Slashdot Mirror


One Step Away from Changing Daylight Savings Time

An anonymous reader writes "Congressional leaders from both parties have signed off on a proposal that will change daylight savings time in the United States as early as this year. All that is left is a signoff by President Bush. If the proposed solution becomes law, DST will be extended two months, from March to November. With many IT applications relying on accurate time information and many having automatic adjustments for DST, how will the IT world handle this change? And with the proposal reportedly taking effect this year, is there enough time to implement change?"

898 comments

  1. Why the IAFC is against the change by waynegoode · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The International Association of Fire Chiefs does not want the change because the new time to switch would not work well with the "check fire alarm batteries when you change your clock" program. That kind of reasoning is ridiculous. Do they really think the US government should set the time for DST changes to suit one group's special program? Talk about special interests.

    The purpose of DST is not to remind you when to check your batteries. If it works for that too, fine; but that is something extra, not the reason for DST. Support or oppose the DST change for REAL reasons.

    From the article:

    For years, the International Association of Fire Chiefs has framed a widespread public information campaign around Daylight Saving Time, reminding people to change the batteries in their smoke and carbon monoxide detectors when they change their clocks. The last weekend in November is too late for the reminder, fire officials say.

    1. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by s20451 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Support or oppose the DST change for REAL reasons.

      Here in Canada, the change is being presented as something the Americans are ramming down our throats. Seriously: here's the Toronto Star coverage.

      What kind of a country is this where you can get a knee-jerk reaction against anything by calling it "American-style"? (I'll tell you: it's the kind of country that, 138 years later, still prints their colonial ruler's face on their money.)

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    2. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by eln · · Score: 5, Funny

      The biggest problem with this change is that Daylight Savings Time will now last much longer than Standard Time. Since it would then be DST most of the time, Daylight Savings Time should be renamed "Standard Time." Of course, that leaves the problem with what to call the old "Standard Time." My suggestions are as follows:

      - Daylight Wasting Time
      - Congress Has Too Much Time on Their Hands Time

    3. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by ZorinLynx · · Score: 2, Informative

      Smoke detector batteries typically last a few years anyway. I change mine once a year, and the battery still has enough juice in it to run something else for quite a while.

      This recommendation should be changed to "Buy a new smoke detector that has long battery life; your old one may not even work properly anymore either. Then change the battery once a year."

      -Z

    4. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Pete+LaGrange · · Score: 1

      The purpose of DST is not to remind you when to check your batteries. If it works for that too, fine; but that is something extra, not the reason for DST. Support or oppose the DST change for REAL reasons.

      The purpose of DST is to give 18th century farmers an extra hour of daylight in the evening during the growing season. It's no longer needed. If we're going to change it, we should do the smart thing and get rid of it.

      --
      loyalty above all, save honor
    5. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by renehollan · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That's what you get for relying on an undocumented feature.

      Phbbbbbbbt!

      --
      You could've hired me.
    6. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by HiddenCamper · · Score: 1

      Do they really think the US government should set the time for DST changes to suit one group's special program? This is the US government, they do it with EVERYTHING else.

    7. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Do they really think the US government should set the time for DST changes to suit one group's special program?

      The purpose of Daylight Savings was to give farmers more time and sunlight to harvest their crops during the summer months. Since we no longer have a farm-based economy, some people been arguing to get rid of Daylight Savings since it no longer serves its original purpose and special interest group. Although I'm sure we got some non-corporate farmers who will raise hell on the issue. ;)

    8. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by srleffler · · Score: 1
      Not to mention that the slight delay in checking the batteries is not a big deal anyway. Most smoke detectors will run for much longer than half a year on a battery, and will warn you by beeping if the battery is running low. I am very safety conscious, but I don't change my smoke detector batteries every time we do the DST change. I just test each of the detectors to make sure that the batteries haven't failed silently and leave it at that.

      The IAFC are a bunch of idiots if they are opposing this change because waiting until November is 'too late'.

    9. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by __aakqkc2748 · · Score: 1

      Keeping people's houses from burning down is a "special program" from "special interests"? Kinda makes you look like a firebug!

    10. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you are joking. Farmers don't care what time a clock says it is. They get up when the sun gets up, DST or no DST.

    11. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by ZeldorBlat · · Score: 2, Informative

      NYT Style:

      Email: ac@slashdot.org
      Pass: password

    12. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by darkonc · · Score: 2, Funny

      Real simple.. We'll have Daylight Savings Time, and Daylight Standard time. That way we don't have to keep changing the abbreviation all the time.. Here on the West coast it'll just be "PST" all year 'round.
      (Patent Pending)

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
    13. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by tricorn · · Score: 1

      No, the original purpose was to save energy during war time. Farmers have no problem getting up at whatever time they need to, they don't need a clock on the wall saying "8 o'clock, time to start farming".

    14. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Dun+Malg · · Score: 4, Informative
      The purpose of Daylight Savings was to give farmers more time and sunlight to harvest their crops during the summer months.

      Nonsense. Farmers are against daylight saving time because they do everything by the sun. They start when the sun rises, and stop when it goes down, regardless of what time it is. A clock that jumps back and forth twice a year is an unnecessary complication that forces them to juggle their schedule when delivering crops to clock-bound businesses. Daylight saving time was instituted regionally in WWI and then made national in WW2 as an energy saving scheme.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    15. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most smoke detectors I've had will chirp annoyingly when they start running low on batteries. This alone gets me to change the battery.

    16. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by SuperBigGulp · · Score: 1

      Why not just make smoke detectors with better batteries?

      Is it seriously the case that the most efficient smoke detector design needs a new 1960s-era battery once a year?

      --
      Someday a Slashdot ID of 177180 will mean something.
    17. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. So why the fuck are they still forcing daylight saving time on us?

      I HATE IT!

    18. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Synn · · Score: 1

      The purpose of Daylight Savings was to give farmers more time and sunlight to harvest their crops during the summer months.

      No, it was put in place during WW1 and WW2 so people could work later in the day without artificial light.

      Farmers work early in the morning, why would they want to shift those morning hours into the evening which is what DST does?

    19. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by someonewhois · · Score: 2, Funny

      I dunno. "What time zone are you in? I'm in GMT." "Oh, I'm in CHTMTOTHT. :)". Sounds kind of akward, eh?

    20. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by stcanard · · Score: 1

      Well, here in Vancouver, that would mean sunset at about 3:30 PM at the end of it, and kids trying to get home in the dark.

      It will be even worse farther north. Can't imagine what Edmonton will do, and there's a lot more north than that.

      So yes, it is being rammed down our throat, because can you imagine the confusion if we didn't follow?

    21. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

      You're not kidding either. Congress does have too much time on their hands. Although their job is to make the laws, they don't have to keep making laws after laws after laws. Their job should be simply, as outlined by the Constitution.

      Either they have year-round Daylight Savings Time, or just keep it the way it is. It will create a new type of Y2K problem so-to-speak.

    22. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by ZorinLynx · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think the issue is, some smoke detectors may fail silently, so it's at least a good idea to have folks mess with them once or twice a year to make sure they still work.

      Personally, every couple of years I ignite some paper in a can and hold it under the detector to make sure it actually detects smoke. A test-button may test the alarm, but what about the smoke detecting part?

      Just be careful not to burn your house down if you do this. }:)

      -Z

    23. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by b!arg · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's a good idea too...I just usually burn something in the oven or on the stovetop. This gives me a weekly check of my smoke detector! No once can say I'm not doing my part for fire prevention!

      --

      Everybody dies frustrated and sad and that is beautiful
    24. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      " The International Association of Fire Chiefs does not want the change because the new time to switch would not work well with the "check fire alarm batteries when you change your clock" program."

      What a bunch of bureaucratic idiots. Do they really think think their program accomplishes anything significant? When daylight savings time starts/stops, do any of you actually think "Wow! It's time to check the batteries in my smoke detector!"?

      You know what makes me check the batteries in our smoke detectors? It's the d*mn beeping that occurs as soon as the voltage level drops slightly. THAT is effective; not some lame-*ss feel good program like theirs.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    25. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Jason+Earl · · Score: 1

      You've never actually met a farmer, have you?

    26. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      DST wasn't implemented nation-wide until 1942 in an effort to save energy during the war. It was repealed in 1945, but then was put back into place in the 1960s, again in an effort to save energy, among other things. It has nothing to do with providing anyone on a farm extra time, because the time they get up (or at least got up) is set by the sun, not by a bunch of people in suits. The farmers were the ones that rebelled against it most strongly when it was first attempted in the early 20th century.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    27. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Phisbut · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Wow... I just love it when people say the stupidest stuff... From the article you pointed :

      While most people -- excepting vampires -- favour more daylight

      ... right... changing the DST will provide you with *more* daylight... it will somehow slow down the earth while the sun is shining, and accelerate it at night...

      What's the point of all this? No matter how you mess around with the DST, you won't get a single minute of daylight that you didn't have before.

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    28. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Inzkeeper · · Score: 1

      I read the article [shock, amazement].
      I see no evidence of anti-american sentiment there.
      It seemed to me to be surprisingly objective at discussing the challenges to Canadians that such a change would bring.

      Perhaps the accusation of a knee-jerk reaction should be pointed in a different direction!

    29. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by sfjoe · · Score: 1

      What kind of a country is this where you can get a knee-jerk reaction against anything by calling it "American-style"?

      In the USA we do the same thing but use France for the predictable knee-jerk response.

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
    30. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Really+Wannabe+Geek · · Score: 1

      "What we need in this country, instead of Daylight Savings Time, which nobody really understands anyway, is a new concept called Weekday Morning Time, whereby at 7 a.m. every weekday we go into a space- launch-style "hold" for two to three hours, during which it just remains 7 a.m. This way we could all wake up via a civilized gradual process of stretching and belching and scratching, and it would still be only 7 a.m. when we were ready to actually emerge from bed."
      --Dave Barry

    31. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Who cares if Canada follows it or not? Arizona doesn't follow DST as it is and while it is confusing, it's not the end of the world. For quite awhile Mexico implemented DST on different dates than the U.S. and the trade between Mexico and the U.S. is the largest in the world.

      Europe doesn't do DST the same time we do either but we seem to get by ok--of course, no-one really cares about Europe.

      So while it would be somewhat confusing, it doesn't really matter. If Canadians feel it's being "rammed down their throat", you guys need to grow a pair and stand up and make sure your voice is heard on such a critical matter of pride for you guys.

    32. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      My family from both sides were farmers. But that was before my time and what's left of the family farms are now paved parking lots. But I have stepped in cow poop -- which I did again when sending off my original message.

    33. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Phisbut · · Score: 1
      Well, here in Vancouver, that would mean sunset at about 3:30 PM at the end of it, and kids trying to get home in the dark.

      Nope, it's the other way around... the "winter time" wouldn't see the sun set any earlier. It's just that "summer time" would last longer. So next december will be no different than last december, while next november would have the sun set (and rise) *later* than last november.

      That way, people will have more natural light and use less artificial light in the evening (and use more of it in the morning... making the whole thing kinda pointless. Good thing we can rely on congress to do pointless stuff...).

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    34. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct me if I am wrong (which I may be) but doesn't daylight savings time move the clock forwards so that you wake up earlier and there is then more light in the evening? If this is the case then sunset would be later (according to the clock), not earlier. So it would not be sunset at 3:30 here in Vancouver.

    35. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by shicaca · · Score: 1

      Just like how everybody laughs at our school systems due to the fact that zero of the American school systems teach any foreign languages until high school while other countries (actually nearly every) teach anywhere from 1 - 3 NEW and NOT FLUENTLY SPOKEN languages to their children right from the get-go (or nearly so). Para el, me gusta español pero yo no sé mucho porque nuestras escuelas no lo tienen. (Loosely translated is, "For me I like Spanish but I don't know much because our schools don't have it.")

    36. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by deathy_epl+ccs · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, but EVERYONE uses France for that predictable knee-jerk response...

    37. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by outsider007 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I would like as an add-on to the bill, a proposal for 13 O'clock to be added to the clock, that way we could all get an extra hour of sleep.

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    38. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1
      What is wrong with the reasoning of the fire chiefs? We live in a society where there are many different groups with many different interests. The whole point of democracy is that everyone says their piece and gets to influence decisions that are made. Making (or not making) changes to DST just because of what the fire chiefs say would be stupid. But it's not stupid for the fire chiefs to say what they want.

      More generally when I say "I want the government to do X" it doesn't mean "I want the government to do X just for me". It means "I want to do the government to do X. Maybe some other people will also say they want X. If enough of us say we want X then I think the government should do X". It's a distinction that many people seem to find too subtle when they make their knee jerk reactions to interest groups.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    39. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Jason+Earl · · Score: 1

      Well, we all know that shit happens :).

    40. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "For me I like Spanish but I don't know much because our schools don't have it."
      so get off your lazy ass and take a class at the j.c.
    41. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by omeomi · · Score: 4, Funny

      Daylight Savings Time should be renamed "Standard Time." Of course, that leaves the problem with what to call the old "Standard Time." My suggestions are as follows:

      We'll just call it "Standard Time Full Speed" and "Standard Time Hi-Speed"...that'll solve the confusion.

    42. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by blibbler · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > I'll tell you: it's the kind of country that, 138 years later, still prints their colonial ruler's face on their money

      That statement is correct except for two minor inacuracies
      1) The image isn't of the Queen of England, but rather the Queen of Canada (so it isn't a colonial ruler)
      2) it isn't the image from 138 years ago, but rather of the current Canadian head of state.

      I am sure that there are some countries who do put images of centuries old rulers on the back of their coins, but it isn't Canada.

    43. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      I suggest "Daylight Savings Time" and "Moonlight Savings Time."

      Don't waste those precious moonlight hours!

    44. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by XO · · Score: 1

      Of course, if you just use a lithium 9V battery, you don't have to worry about it for a decade or more.

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    45. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Eugene · · Score: 1

      the clock won't give farmers *extra* time on sunlight, since farmers work by the sun ANYWAY. and I really not sure why US keep using DST, maybe because special interest?

    46. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where are my mod points when I need them!!

    47. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by mirqry · · Score: 2, Insightful
      What's the point of all this? No matter how you mess around with the DST, you won't get a single minute of daylight that you didn't have before.
      Its not the amount of daylight, Its when you are awake, the percentage of the day that it is light out.

      Lets say you goto sleep at 10PM every night. If it gets dark at 6PM all the lights in your house are on for 4 hours. If it gets dark at 7PM instead, thats an hour less electricy used. On the flip side the sun coming up at 6AM instead of 5AM won't matter because most people are asleep then anyway.
    48. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by cujo_1111 · · Score: 1

      That makes total sense... So either every day becomes an hour out so that eventually 12 AM is midday or you get to sleep for the same length of time, just the time figure changes...

      --
      If I point out that you are incorrect, making me a foe does not make you any more correct.
    49. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, actually they don't.

    50. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by badasscat · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Just like how everybody laughs at our school systems due to the fact that zero of the American school systems teach any foreign languages until high school while other countries (actually nearly every) teach anywhere from 1 - 3 NEW and NOT FLUENTLY SPOKEN languages to their children right from the get-go (or nearly so).

      Well, I went to public school in the US and I learned Spanish and German starting in the 4th grade.

      This is the thing about the United States that people from other (smaller) countries don't seem to grasp... and as you illustrate, even a lot of Americans forget it. It's a huge country, and it's very regional. There are 50 states. There are tens of thousands of school districts within those states. Every district does things differently. Is it fair? No. But you can't generalize like this about the US, about almost anything.

      I'd be willing to put money down that there are more fluent Spanish-speaking Americans than fluent English-speaking Spaniards, even as a percentage of the population.

    51. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by bewebste · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, of course there isn't actually more total daylight. But we humans like to keep the times we use to schedule everything constant from day to day. The goal is to maximize the intersection of the interval of time that people are awake and working with the interval of time where there is daylight. Instead of shifting when we wake up, go to work, and go to sleep, we instead just shift the clock and keep our schedules the same.

    52. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by ErikRed1488 · · Score: 1

      The purpose of Daylight Savings was to give farmers more time and sunlight to harvest their crops during the summer months.
      So, you're saying that somehow the sun is out longer during DST? Did you even think before posting that crap?

      --
      I was not touched there by an angel.
    53. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by zippthorne · · Score: 2, Funny

      There's a queen of canada? Or do you just take the Queen of England and call her the Queen of Canada (kind of like prince charles is Prince of Wales.. shouldn't he be prince of England if his mum is the queen?)

      The only titles of nobility I recognize are Helium, Neon, Argon, Krypton, Xenon and Radon. And I don't count Radon since it's only temporary.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    54. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by cujo_1111 · · Score: 1

      Or hard wire them into your house and have a rechargeable battery backup... seems logical to me. Like this

      --
      If I point out that you are incorrect, making me a foe does not make you any more correct.
    55. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by joshdick · · Score: 1

      Since we no longer have a farm-based economy

      Buzzz! Wrong. Agriculture remains the largest industry in the United States. In addition, as others have pointed out, farmers aren't actually that keen on DST.

      Thanks for playing, though. We have some lovely parting gifts.

    56. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      I just wish people would stop calling me a vampire...so I like the night and my canine teeth sometimes get noticed...jeez.

    57. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Jambon · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Here in Canada, the change is being presented as something the Americans are ramming down our throats

      Well, it is if you think about it. Instead of asking the rest of North America how they would like things to work, the U.S. just decided to go change it on their own. They just assumed, as the most powerful nation in the world, that everyone else would follow suit.

      What kind of a country is this where you can get a knee-jerk reaction against anything by calling it "American-style"?

      Now, as a Canadian who has lived in the U.S., I would agree that the knee jerk reaction gets overdone a lot among Canadians, but this is, in a way, a good example of why America isn't so popular there. It tends to do things without consulting anyone else who might be affected by its decisions.

      What I would like to know, however, is why does there have to be a change in the time, when, as has been said, they could just have employers and schools change their schedules to adapt to the change in daylight? The logic behind changing the meaning of the hours just baffles me.

      I'll tell you: it's the kind of country that, 138 years later, still prints their colonial ruler's face on their money

      What the hell does that have to do with anything? So our money has the Queen on it. We didn't have a bloody revolutionary war. Seems like a decent deal to me.

    58. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, every couple of years I ignite some paper in a can and hold it under the detector to make sure it actually detects smoke. A test-button may test the alarm, but what about the smoke detecting part?

      That's a really (really really) bad way to test it. Don't do this, folks. Really.

    59. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Originally, daylight saving time was not a suggestion to actually change the actual clocks, but just a suggestion to get up earlier. Essentially it would have the same effect, without us having to worry about changing all the clocks, and the confusion with those who don't observe daylight saving time. But then people would have the mental thought to overcome of actually waking up earlier.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    60. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by downundarob · · Score: 1

      The Queen of England is also the Queen of Canada, she is also the Queen of Australia and the Queen of New Zealand, just to name a few more.

    61. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      You do realize that technically, Queen Elizabeth 2 is still our head of state, and hence the reason she appears on our bills. The governor general, who is appointed by the queen, has veto power over Canadian laws being passed.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    62. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Desert+Raven · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Arizona doesn't follow DST as it is and while it is confusing,

      Funny, I don't find it confusing at all. I never have to change my clocks around, somehow pretending it has any kind of meaning. And, I know that no matter what the date, my time is GMT -7.

      Given the increasingly global, and increasingly 24 hour world we live in, it makes much more sense to me to get rid of the anachronism of "daylight savings time" all together.

    63. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Glendale2x · · Score: 1

      Why do we even need DST? The state of Arizona seems to still work just fine.

      --
      this is my sig
    64. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by jaseparlo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What kind of a country is this where you can get a knee-jerk reaction against anything by calling it "American-style"? That would be pretty much every country in the world. Reflexive adoration is just as much a knee jerk reaction as rejecting it automatically. Some people in Australia think America is the centre of the universe, others despise the influence it has on what little is left of our culture. Other countries are the same, with variances one way or another. The only thing you can't do with American-style is ignore it. Unfortunately.

      --
      All available data suggest that regardless of any of this, the sun will still come up tomorrow.
    65. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by hunterx11 · · Score: 2, Funny
      can you imagine the confusion if we didn't follow?

      We Americans are more concerned by the confusion caused by your 20 hour day than a slight adjustment such as daylight savings time.

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    66. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by downundarob · · Score: 1

      Here in Australia the big 'change your smoke alarm battery' day is April 1, no fooling..

    67. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by hunterx11 · · Score: 3, Informative

      It is perhaps nitpicking, but Elizabeth II's title as the sovereign of Canada is seperate from her title as the sovereign of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Nothern Ireland. When she visits Canada, she wears Canadian regalia. In practice, however, it doesn't really matter since the Queen doesn't actually do anything anyway, and I have met Candians unfamiliar with this distinction.

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    68. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Do they really think the US government should
      > set the time for DST changes to suit one
      > group's special program? Talk about special
      > interests.

      More like arogant. Many Fire Chiefs are vested
      with a ridiculous amount of fiat power and can
      be petty tyrants of sorts, if they like. They can
      find a lot of reasons to deny you access to your
      house, business, and property, or shutdown an
      event based on some contrived ordinance, or law.
      After you've been a Fire Chief for a while you
      begin to think the world revolves around you.

    69. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd be willing to put money down that there are more fluent Spanish-speaking Americans than fluent English-speaking Spaniards, even as a percentage of the population.

      Well, that's because the Spaniards aren't swimming across the Channel.

    70. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fah!

      Let's go for the GUSTO (Grand Unified Standard Time Optimization!)

      Mar-Apr and Oct-Nov = DST (1 hour change)
      Apr-Oct = XDST (2 hour change)

      And this, amigos, will keep the programming folks in JOBS for many hours (either DST or XDST, your choice.)

    71. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by shicaca · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I wish that was true in my area. I would have loved to see us learn a new language. The sad thing was at the private school I was in we learned snippets of Spanish and then it was abandoned b/c they didn't have the funds to keep it going (I was in things such as "math plus" and such that allowed me to do these things... While other kids were learning simple addition I was learning multiplication. While they were learning multiplication I was learning how to find the value of a variable. Somehow somewhere I learned how to count to 10 in spanish and french. I, obviously, liked spanish more b/c the spelling was easier. I still do. I took spanish for four years in high school and then two more in college. I changed to Latin part way through and found that this was a big mistake b/c I enjoyed spanish just way too much. I guess I am sort of amazed b/c the town about 20 min away (I live in farm country that doesn't help either) is overwhelmingly populated with Spanish speaking Americans, yet we don't/didn't "learn" spanish til we were in 9th grade. What a crock.

    72. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Atryn · · Score: 2, Funny
      The Queen of England is also the Queen of Canada, she is also the Queen of Australia and the Queen of New Zealand, just to name a few more.
      Mayeb ya'll should consider a revolution? I know, it was so last millenium, but you could get another holiday out of it...
      --
      Come play Moral Decay!
    73. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by bigpat · · Score: 1

      That way, people will have more natural light and use less artificial light in the evening (and use more of it in the morning... making the whole thing kinda pointless. Good thing we can rely on congress to do pointless stuff...).

      Either way I plan on getting up after the sun rises.

    74. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      Support or oppose the DST change for REAL reasons.

      I'm of the notion that time is absolute. If we want to mandate something through the force of law, we should mandate that schools and businesses change their hours of operation.

      Not play around with something that's moving at a constant speed in a single direction!!!1!

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    75. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct! My fiancee teaches at an elementary school in Reston, VA that has a "Spanish immersion" program. Students at every grade level have classes given in Spanish for half of the day.

    76. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by WilliamSChips · · Score: 0

      Except the French.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    77. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by CptNerd · · Score: 1
      Simple:

      DST - New Time

      ST - Time Classic

      Worked for Coca-Cola, didn't it?

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    78. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'd be willing to put money down that there are more fluent Spanish-speaking Americans than fluent English-speaking Spaniards, even as a percentage of the population.


      I doubt that's true even including immigrants. Excluding first generation immigrants, I have a hard time believing that. Excluding second-generation immigrants, I thinks it's a statistic you pulled out of your ass.
    79. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Just like how everybody laughs at our school systems due to the fact that zero of the American school systems teach any foreign languages until high school

      I was taught Spanish in school BEFORE 1st grade. That's right, kindergarten. Dual-language classrooms.

      teach anywhere from 1 - 3 NEW and NOT FLUENTLY SPOKEN languages to their children

      You're making the huge assumption that learning multiple different (useless) languages is somehow a good thing. I'd like to see some comprehensive studies before I even accept your predicate argument here.

      I attended what is probably one of the crappiest school districts in the country, and had the option of two different foreign language classes as of 7th grade
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    80. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Dwonis · · Score: 1
      The governor general, who is appointed by the queen, has veto power over Canadian laws being passed.

      The Governor General is appointed by "the Queen on the advice of the Prime Minister" (i.e. by the Prime Minister), and the veto power is mostly symbolic (i.e. it is not exercised).

    81. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      Maybe a good time to check your fire detectors is right after you've put up your Christmas tree.

    82. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by shicaca · · Score: 1

      Go to Europe or many other places and they don't "learn" the language. They speak it fluently and can comprehend it. I, personally, need to still hear a sentence 10 times sometimes before I can tell what someone's saying b/c the way we're "taught". If you're exposed to it and MADE to use it since in early, early grade school it's proven that you not only understand it easier, but can retain it as long as it's used occasionally. It's b/c of the way the brain works. By far most of the schools, in Ohio at least, are not dual language and by all intensive purposes should be. I, personally, put merit into the reports that say Spanish can and will be the new English in the US. Not that it'll take over completely, but it will definitely be more prevalent in the future. That's all fine and dandy that you were "taught" Spanish in kindergarten, but how much did you "learn"? The numbers 1 - 10, the alphabet (MAYBE), and colors?

    83. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, in the UK we use America

    84. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Like the US? Sacajawea is on the one-dollar coin. Before her, we had Susn B. Anthony on it.

    85. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by vwjeff · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is the thing about the United States that people from other (smaller) countries don't seem to grasp... and as you illustrate, even a lot of Americans forget it. It's a huge country, and it's very regional. There are 50 states.

      I could not have said it better myself. I live in Wisconsin (about the size of Germany) and the changes even within the state are amazing. For example, the opening day of deer hunting season might as well be a holiday. In the North where I am attending college, everyone leaves and hunts with their friends, family, ect. I am from Southern Wisconsin where hunting is not as popular mainly due to the environment. Southern Wisconsin is farmland for the most part. Forests are few and far between.

      It may sound weird but I experienced culture shock my first year at college. I came from a high school that was racially diverse, with a 30% African-American and a 15% Hispanic student body. Spanish, German, Latin, and French were offered. I took Spanish for two years. Most people didn't take a foreign language because chances are they won't live or do business in a foreign country.

      When I arrived at college it was weird because the campus was 96% white. I myself come from a German background but never looked at myself as being white. The weather was also much different. In the winter, the temp. never got above 25 F. It was usually around 0. In Southern Wisconsin, winter temps. rarely went below 20 F. When it went below zero school was usually cancelled. Up North when it went below zero, put on extra clothes. The student parking lots have electrical outlets so you can plug in your engine block heater. As a Freshman I arrived in August when the weather was warm. I wondered what the hell the outlets were for. I realized what they were for when winter arrived. Before leaving for Christmas break I decided to warm up my car. It was -25 F outside. My car wouldn't turn over. I got a jump from someone and amazinly the car started, and ran for 45 seconds before the block cracked.

      So what's my point. Do I have a point? As a matter of fact I do.

      The United States might as well be called the United Countries. Every State has different standards, practices, cultures, ect. Within the States there are hundrends if not thousands of microcosms. It is relatively easy for one to say that European schools are better because they teach more languages at younger ages. The fact is they have to. Look at the geography. In an area roughly the size of the US English, French, Spanish, Italian, and German are spoken. A trip between France and Spain is like a trip for me between Wisconsin and Kansas. Europeans must learn multiple languages to be successful. In the US we only need to teach our children how to work long hours with no overtime. (From personal experience.) Languages other than English are not seen as important however this is starting to change in the Southern US.

    86. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      Care to elaborate?

      I don't see how this is worse than just pressing the button, which doesn't test the smoke detecting at all.

      -Z

    87. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by hmniq · · Score: 0

      I'd be willing to put money down that there are more fluent Spanish-speaking Americans than fluent English-speaking Spaniards, even as a percentage of the population.

      Assuming your claim is true, it would only be noteworthy if Spain shared a border with the US.

    88. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by TykeClone · · Score: 1
      For example, the opening day of deer hunting season might as well be a holiday. In the North where I am attending college, everyone leaves and hunts with their friends, family, ect. I am from Southern Wisconsin where hunting is not as popular mainly due to the environment. Southern Wisconsin is farmland for the most part. Forests are few and far between.

      Corn fed deer are better than those hippy deer that eat twigs and stuff :)

      Don't make the mistake of thinking that just becuase there are no forests, there are no deer.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    89. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In regard to changing ST/DT dates:

      What about the CMOS/Operating System codes that make this work automatically now?

      That would be an interesting update.

    90. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by ChairmanMeow · · Score: 1

      Their job is to make laws. They just happen to be very good at their job. Too good at it, in fact.

      --
    91. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by JoshRosenbaum · · Score: 1

      DISCLAIMER: Hmmm, I have no clue how a smoke detector works, but thought I'd add this. Maybe someone who has more detailed information on this can englighten me.

      In any case, testing a smoke detector by putting actual smoke under it seems to be a bad idea to me, because you are probably reducing its capability to sense smoke. After a while it might get clogged with smoke, and not be able to detect it.

      Thoughts?

    92. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Cracell · · Score: 1

      ya this sort of change scares me...it will screw me thousands up...I have tons of devices with auto-set to change for daylight savings...and tons of software will have to be patched....it'd be one thing is they were getting rid of daylight savings...but to simply alter it is stupid...and a scary trend starting for congress

      --
      Signatures are so 90s
    93. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thoughts?

      Yes, that you're a retard.

      For one, what the fuck would the smoke particles be clogging due to testing? If that were possible then smoke particles, pollen, and other crap in the air would clog the damn thing in no time.

      Secondly, you have the ability to fucking create a slashdot login and make dumb comments, yet can't be bothered to search google or howstuffworks for what are very straightforward questions.

    94. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      everybody laughs at our school systems due to the fact that zero of the American school systems teach any foreign languages until high school while other countries (actually nearly every) teach anywhere from 1 - 3 NEW and NOT FLUENTLY SPOKEN languages to their children right from the get-go

      A lot of countries (especially in Europe ) are so damned small that you NEED to have multiple languages, just to deal with people 100 miles away.

      America is so damned BIG, that you cam drive in a straight line 3000 miles, and speak only one language.

      "In Europe, they think 200 miles is a big distance. In America, they thing 200 years is a long time."

    95. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1


      Doesn't Duracell(TM) sponsor their periodic smoke-detector-battery campaign?

    96. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Atrax · · Score: 1

      > Either way I plan on getting up after the sun rises.

      You're saying the sun *rises*?

      I don't believe you - I've never seen it do that....

      --
      Screw you all! I'm off to the pub
    97. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by mferrare · · Score: 1

      It's not worth it. They'll just replace the Queen's Birthday holiday with some president's or yay-we-chucked-out-the-queen day. Not enough to spark a revolution

      --
      Why would anyone want to use a text editor that is not vi?
    98. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by miyako · · Score: 1

      yeah, and what about the vampires? We have a right to our nighttime too damnit!

      --
      Famous Last Words: "hmm...wikipedia says it's edible"
    99. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by blibbler · · Score: 3, Interesting

      As others have stated, the queen of Canada (and Australia, New Zealand, etc) is not defined as the Queen of England. They just happen to be following the same lineage at the moment.

      If the current, shared royal family dies out, there is no reason Canada would adopt the same royal family as England.

      Another situation where they could diverge is the sovereign of England is also the Head of the Church of England. In theory, if the Queen (or her successor) converted to Islam, or some other religion, then she would cease to be the Queen of England, but she would remain the Queen of Canada.

    100. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by pintomp3 · · Score: 1

      i understand you cannot put everyone (250 million) in the same boat. the grandparent obvious made this mistake. but you are still in the minority. the vast majority of americans never learn to speak another language. they may have taken a couple years of a language in HS or college, but only the bare minimum. i would hardly consider them fluent. btw, i'm not counting ppl who already know another language because they are immigrants or have parents that are. i don't know how many times i've heard the word "quesadilla" pronouced with the "l" sound.

    101. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by pintomp3 · · Score: 1

      don't most smoke detectors beep when they r are low on batteries? i understand that you want to check on the device that can save your life, but it's already got a mechanism to remind you to change batteries. every smoke detector i've had has always made it hard to ignore that the batteries are low. this is a much better reminder than "i get one less/more hour of sleep, gotta change all the clocks (gotta love how everything has a clock on it now) and what was that other thing?"

    102. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Nirvelli · · Score: 1

      ...And 90% of them are in California.

    103. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by MemoryAid · · Score: 1

      Perhaps DST should be extended for six months, instead of just two, if it's so good. That would also solve the problem of remembering which half of the calendar was called standard time, and which was daylight time. I also wouldn't have to change my clocks.

      --
      Language students: Don't try to learn English here. This ain't it.
    104. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about :

      Standard Time: Expanded Time.
      DST: Extended Time.

    105. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by vanko1 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps that Arizona sun has addled your brain. The largest trading partners in the world, by far, are Canada and the US.

    106. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by mykdavies · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The United States might as well be called the United Countries.

      Well, you know, it already is; 'state' is another word for 'country' - in British English we refer to state-funding, the state pension scheme etc. I think the founding fathers really saw their respective territories as potentially independent (nation) states joining together in a mutual defence and commerce pact.

      I was interested to see that the entry here (which I assume to use American English) puts the "United States" use of the word below the "nation state" use.

      I think your story did highlight the diversity of the US very well; many foreigners look at the US as one country, whereas I think it's more interesting (certainly when travelling) to look at it as a union of 50 separate countries which happen to share a common language and currency.

      --
      The world has changed and we all have become metal men.
    107. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by retrosteve · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > In the USA we do the same thing but use France for the predictable knee-jerk response. ...yet another thing the Americans have in common with the British.

      Did you know that English spelling reform was almost undertaken but was shelved because the French were doing it? We've suffered 300 years of crazy English spelling for that one.

    108. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'd be willing to put money down that there are more fluent Spanish-speaking Americans than fluent English-speaking Spaniards, even as a percentage of the population.


      A quick Google search shows about 18% of Spain speaks English as a second language (nevermind the Poms invading the coast) and "nearly 1 in 5" Americans (to use the misnomer) speak Spanish.


      You're about on par.

    109. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Afty0r · · Score: 1
      It is relatively easy for one to say that European schools are better because they teach more languages at younger ages. The fact is they have to. Look at the geography. In an area roughly the size of the US English, French, Spanish, Italian, and German are spoken.
      I agree with much of what you said... just wanted to look at the languages you mentioned.

      Add in Portugese, Basque, Welsh, Gaelic, Swiss German, Swedish, Norwegian, Danish, Dutch, Belgian, Slovenian, Czech, Polish, Croatian, and probably around a dozen more I haven't mentioned. And yes, these are primary languages of regions or countries within a similar geographic area :)
    110. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      You'd have to pronounce it "Cheatem' to the T!"

    111. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by will_die · · Score: 1

      Not sure about that but in some time zone I am pretty sure you just summoned an ancient one.

    112. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What kind of a country is this where you can get a knee-jerk reaction against anything by calling it "American-style"? (I'll tell you: it's the kind of country that, 138 years later, still prints their colonial ruler's face on their money.)"

      The same country that could ass fuck your country into submission in less than a few hours!

    113. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by RupW · · Score: 1

      Personally, every couple of years I ignite some paper in a can and hold it under the detector to make sure it actually detects smoke. A test-button may test the alarm, but what about the smoke detecting part?

      IIRC, it uses beta radiation across a small gap to a radiation detector. Smoke absorbs the beta radiation so the alarm goes off if it stops detecting. So if the beta source fails, the alarm should go off.

      The only ways I can see the smoke detection part failing would be if the detector component somehow gets itself locked on "yes there's radiation" or if the beta source falls across the gap so there's effectively no gap between the source and the detector. I doubt either's very likely.

    114. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by matth · · Score: 1

      How do you figure? My fire alarms routinely last a year or more... changing them every 6 months or so is a rediculous waste of batteries... they beep when the batteries are GOING dead...

    115. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The United States might as well be called the United Countries. Every State has different standards, practices, cultures, ect. Within the States there are hundrends if not thousands of microcosms.

      Unfortunately the red "countries" currently outnumber the blue "countries".

    116. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Maestro4k · · Score: 1

      Just like how everybody laughs at our school systems due to the fact that zero of the American school systems teach any foreign languages until high school On the off chance you're just misinformed and would like to learn, here's some concrete proof that you're very wrong. Here is a listing of all Foreign Language Education programs in the state of Tennessee. I happen to know the professor whose site this comes from, this list is updated regularly as she receives information on changes/additions. From that you can see that we're so backwards here in Tennessee that we even have a few pre-Kindegarten foreign language programs in the state. Some areas have foreign language classes K-12.

    117. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      "check fire alarm batteries when you change your clock"

      Wasn't the mnemonic "change your fire alarm batteries on Flag Day"?

      Me, I change mine the day after the night when they screech at 2am at 100 db and I wake up with a 190 pulse rate.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    118. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by indifferent+children · · Score: 1
      You don't seem to understand that when we say "change our clocks", we don't actually change the clocks. We just change the time to which the clocks are set.

      OTOH if we forced every American to buy new clocks and watches twice a year, that would really stimulate the economy!

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    119. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about "Standard Time Full Usage" instead, so we can abbreviate it STFU?

    120. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by xMilkmanDanx · · Score: 1

      But just look how well that's worked for the French. Did they reform by tacking on a random letter on the end of each word and saying its silent?

      "The new improved spelling system for French, brought to you by the French dictionary manufacturing association!"

      Yeah, english spelling system (such as it is) sucks but seems like we dodged a bullet there!

    121. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by dptalia · · Score: 1

      My damned smoke detectors go off every time I bake something.... It's a much more frequent test!

      --
      Genius is one percent inspiration and 99 percent perspiration, which is why engineers sometimes smell really bad.
    122. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of a country is this where you can get a knee-jerk reaction against anything by calling it "American-style"?

      What kind of country allows its prestige to fall so far that its name can be used (successfully, even) to evoke that kind of reaction?

    123. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

      Right, but in those winter months, most people already get up in the dark. So, now you're using an additional hour of electricity in the morning instead of the evening! And, you might be using more energy for heat as well, since you'll start heating office buildings and homes to "awake" temperatures an hour earlier as well. And guess what? It's usually colder at sunrise than at sunset.

      Really, the reason business pushes for extended DST is to increase business. People are more likely to shop during daylight than dark, so the story goes. And people are more likely to shop after work than before.

      I say just abolish "standard time" and stick to DST all year round. The energy argument's nearly a wash to slightly negative in the winter and may be slightly favorable in the summer. I just want more daylight during the hours I'm most awake.

      --Joe
    124. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Rufus88 · · Score: 1

      What's the point of all this? No matter how you mess around with the DST, you won't get a single minute of daylight that you didn't have before.

      Amen, brother! Trying to "save daylight" by messing with the clocks is like trying to make yourself taller by cutting off your head and standing on it.

    125. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by dutky · · Score: 1
      blibbler wrote
      I am sure that there are some countries who do put images of centuries old rulers on the back of their coins, but it isn't Canada.

      You, sir (or madame) are a teller of tall tails: we don't put images of centuries old rulers on the backs of our coinage (or paper money): we put them on the fonts of the money, where they belong!
    126. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      The United States used to be a federation, but the Democrats and Republicans seemed to have forgotten somewhere along the way. The country is called the "United States of America", and not simply "America", for a reason that probably baffles most voters. "Down with that archaric Electoral College!" they shout.

    127. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no, no! You have it all wrong!

      The real reason farmers are against DST is that the extra hour of daylight is bad for their crops!

    128. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by fredbox · · Score: 0

      You just haven't stayed up late enough.

      --
      His name was Robert Paulsen.
    129. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately the red "countries" currently outnumber the blue "countries".

      Thank God Almighty.

    130. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by m-wielgo · · Score: 1

      ummm, Arizona doesn't do DST for that very reason!

      more daylight during the day = hot as f-ck. today we reached 111F!!!

    131. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by evilviper · · Score: 1

      You still didn't bother to address my second point at all. It's a big jump to say that learning a second language somehow helps you.

      Most people will never need to know a second language, and even if they did, it's hard to say what language that will be when they're only 7 years-old.

      So why should some other classes be cut to teach foreign languages?

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    132. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by vwjeff · · Score: 1

      Corn fed deer are better than those hippy deer that eat twigs and stuff :) Corn fed deer are better eating however hunting without the farmer's permission will get you shot.

    133. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by vwjeff · · Score: 1

      Add in Portugese, Basque, Welsh, Gaelic, Swiss German, Swedish, Norwegian, Danish, Dutch, Belgian, Slovenian, Czech, Polish, Croatian, and probably around a dozen more I haven't mentioned. And yes, these are primary languages of regions or countries within a similar geographic area :) I realize I missed many spoken languages now that you mentioned them. With the formation of the EU, I can envision a time when many of these languages become forgotten. This won't happen in my lifetime but a few centuries from now could be a different story. It is sad when a group of people lose their identity. I'm glad the Brits decided to stay with the Pound instead of moving to the Euro. People need some traditions and customs. I see the European consolidation having positive short term advantages but the long term is for time to tell. My opinion is from my point of view as an American however I did spend a year studying abroad last year in London. My heart goes out to those affected by the bombings. Exactly one year ago I was using the Underground in London. It is an amazing system that is well kept, clean, and orderly. Last year the workers went on strike and it was amazing to see the panic and fear of many people. The Underground was only closed for a day however the entire city came to a halt. I was amazed. I can only imagine how users of the Underground feel now. Mind the Gap :)

    134. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait until they want to save even more on oil consumption and then add more months to DST down the road. Eventually all our time will be on DST and the US would have single handedly fucked up the space time continuum.

    135. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by TykeClone · · Score: 1
      however hunting without the farmer's permission will get you shot.

      That should be self evident - for both people and deer :)

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    136. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by leonardluen · · Score: 1

      When it went below zero school was usually cancelled. Up North when it went below zero, put on extra clothes.

      now you know where all those grandfather type stories of "in our day we had to walk uphill both ways in snow up to our ears and our spit would be frozen before it hit the ground..." come from!

      (i am from WI also)

    137. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by charlieo88 · · Score: 1

      The word state isn't different in American English, but he's from Wisconsin, so allowance have to be made.

    138. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by charlieo88 · · Score: 1

      This is the thing about the United States that people from other (smaller) countries don't seem to grasp... and as you illustrate, even a lot of Americans forget it. It's a huge country, and it's very regional.

      Very true.

      I had a boss from England. While visiting a customer in Michigan, there was a blizzard that closed the airport. I called to let him know that I wouldn't be able to attend his weekly '10am, yell at the troops meeting' the next day. So he tells me to rent a car and drive back to Fort Lauderdale, I should get back in plenty of time. I had to explain that driving without break or allowing for weather conditions would still leave me 10 hours away when the meeting started.

    139. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1

      Ever read the articles of confederation?

    140. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by electr01nik · · Score: 1

      That's why Congress is the opposite of progress...

    141. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Eivind · · Score: 1
      Thank you for demonstrating the point. Fact is, you'll really rarely meet arguments like that from anyone other than a American.

    142. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Fact is, you'll really rarely meet arguments like that from anyone other than a American.

      And, you rarely see (cultural) elitism from anyone other than a European...

      So... It's your observation that only Americans want FACTUAL EVIDENCE to back up arguments?
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    143. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by jadavis · · Score: 1

      The Articles of Confederation did not provide for a common defense.

      --
      Social scientists are inspired by theories; scientists are humbled by facts.
    144. Re:Why the IAFC is against the change by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1

      True, but the basis of it had much more of a stance of 'state power' (in excessive amounts, or so history books tell us) rather than today's mantra of shared power (which, as we all know, means shit).

  2. Billing rates are going up!!!! by lecithin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's Y2K all over again. :)

    Hopefully the consulting companies will be able to sell the scare and raise the billing rates!

    Jobs!!!! Jobs!!!!

    How about we have our 'puters set for GMT?

    Seriously-Many applications have DST deep in the code. I can see the folks that develop things like the Netbackup scheduler (and others) to be freaking. Didn't they just fix bpsched? (again?)

    --
    It could be worse, it could be Monday.
    1. Re:Billing rates are going up!!!! by fiori · · Score: 1

      How about we have our 'puters set for GMT? This is standard practice if you are required to manage devices across time zones. It does wonders for the admin's sanity. You don't need to know "is it tomorrow or today or yesterday?" and "if the server is five time zones away, what time should it be there?" anymore.

    2. Re:Billing rates are going up!!!! by sewagemaster · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's Y2K all over again. :)
      Hopefully the consulting companies will be able to sell the scare and raise the billing rates!
      Jobs!!!! Jobs!!!!


      This is like rediscoving your erection again. In the beginning there were no problems having one. Then it disappeared, seemingly for good. And suddenly it all came back like saussages at a hotdog stand!

    3. Re:Billing rates are going up!!!! by TCM · · Score: 2, Informative

      How about we have our 'puters set for GMT?

      Proper OSes run with the hardware clock set to UTC and /etc/localtime set to the correct timezone. This way, DST changes don't affect the hardware clock at all and happen automatically as encoded in the timezone file.

      --
      Of course it runs NetBSD. BTC: 1NT7QvbetmANwaMzhpVL6
    4. Re:Billing rates are going up!!!! by anonymous22 · · Score: 0

      Only on the Unix systems. And as long as people update their OS, whatever it might be, regularly, nobody should have a problem.

      --
      Anyone who runs is V.C. Anyone who stands still is well-disciplined V.C.
      Door Gunner, Full Metal Jacket
    5. Re:Billing rates are going up!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      How about we have our 'puters set for GMT?
      Another idea is to set your systems time to UTC.

    6. Re:Billing rates are going up!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WHAT?!

    7. Re:Billing rates are going up!!!! by cortana · · Score: 1

      What's the difference? :)

    8. Re:Billing rates are going up!!!! by deathy_epl+ccs · · Score: 1

      I think you overestimate the cost of updating by comparing it to Y2k. Most of the changes to support DST will be made at an OS level, as opposed to an application/database level. I do not think this will have much of an impact, but it will still be a bit of a shuffle to get it done by November.

    9. Re:Billing rates are going up!!!! by aaza · · Score: 1
      What's the difference? :)

      They're spelt differently...

      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice.
      In practice, however, there is.
    10. Re:Billing rates are going up!!!! by Curmudgeonlyoldbloke · · Score: 1

      > Many applications have DST deep in the code.

      Most don't, because the DST start and end dates aren't standard. There are countries outside the US and (gasp!) sometimes they don't do things at the same time as in the US.

      As has already been mentioned, in the US whether DST applies or not can depend on which side of a river you are within a particular state.

    11. Re:Billing rates are going up!!!! by pintomp3 · · Score: 1

      don't know about you. but mine "rears it's ugly head" more than once every 5 years.

    12. Re:Billing rates are going up!!!! by RollingThunder · · Score: 1

      I don't think bpsched ever worked. ;)

      I do love Netbackup, but it's truly a cantankerous beast.

      Disk staging is my current nemesis. I had to write up my own monitoring scripts to tell me the staging volume was approaching capacity, because Netbackup would just run out of space and start failing jobs all over. No warning at all.

  3. Fix by ehaggis · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Will this fix the /. post delay?

    --
    One ring to bind them - should probably have more fiber and less rings in their diet.
    1. Re:Fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      hahaha, whoever the idiot is that marked this redundant should have the dunce cap put on.

  4. Why is this neccesary? by DerekJ212 · · Score: 0

    And this is needed why?

    1. Re:Why is this neccesary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Halliburton has a no-bid contract to fix all the resulting problems?

    2. Re:Why is this neccesary? by randallpowell · · Score: 0

      DST was for farmers so they could harvest their crops. As corporate farms are taking over and USA imports more food than we can grow (not good to import too much food for security reasons), I think it's time to be done with it. Makes it easier not to change the clocks and worry if Linux caught the time change. I say be rid of it.

  5. This is spectacular by A+Dafa+Disciple · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "How will the IT world handle this change?"

    I'll tell you how they'll handle it. They'll handle it the same way they handled Y2K, and that's by offering more jobs for people like me. The increase in demand for employees posessing the special skills needed to fix this problem will subsequently raise the expected salary for software engineers and IT professionals. Under these premises, I'd say this gives us something to toast and look forward to.

    I hope that Bush doesn't screw this up by not signing off.

    --
    I'm not a troll; I'm just a skeptic.

    1. Re:This is spectacular by ottergoose · · Score: 4, Funny

      Next thing you know Bush will make us use a calandar based on how many days it has been since Jesus died. That would be absurd.

    2. Re:This is spectacular by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      It will help a few engineers, at the expense of the rest of the economy. Instead of spending their money on R&D or productsd, they will instead be forced to hire developers to fiddle with old code for no real gain. In addition, these engineers and others will not be able to produce code and features that would help the buisnesses produce goods and services more effectively. The end result will be millions lost to the economy for no tangible gain. Hoping for this change based on those reasons is special interestism at its worst.

      I'd like to see why Congress is even considering making this change. Is there any reason why DST would be altered? What are the gains to doing this? It seems like an utterly useless thing to do.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    3. Re:This is spectacular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll tell you how they'll handle it. They'll handle it the same way they handled Y2K, and that's by offering more jobs for people like me.

      So, you work for an Indian outsourcing company?

    4. Re:This is spectacular by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Creating make-work projects doesn't help the economy.

      If that were the case, the government might as well pay you to jerk off to porn.

      More money moving around doesn't mean value created, when the person paying is artificially forced to pay just to maintain the status quo.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    5. Re:This is spectacular by Fyre2012 · · Score: 1

      Not any more absurd than the number of seconds since 1/1/1970

      --
      This is not the greatest .sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
    6. Re:This is spectacular by Tongo · · Score: 1

      Did you RTFA...on no, of course not, forgot where I was for a second.

      The whole point behind DST in recent years is to save energy by not having to have the lights on so early. The article said that it could save something like 100,000 barrels of oil a day.

    7. Re:This is spectacular by Hawke666 · · Score: 1

      ...or one could just [drum roll please] have the lights on when it's dark, and not when it's light. What a brilliant idea!!

    8. Re:This is spectacular by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1
      ...use a calandar based on how many days it has been since Jesus died. That would be absurd.

      Of course it would be. Everyone knows it should be based on the number of days since the world began.

      --
      That is all.
    9. Re:This is spectacular by ifishfortorque · · Score: 1

      That'd be truly ridiculous. They'd probably call it something like "Anno Domini" to emphasize it. Then you could abbreviate it "A.D." wait a minute . . .

    10. Re:This is spectacular by ATMAvatar · · Score: 1

      Obviously, the solution should be to use a calendar based upon how many days it has been since Jesus was born.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    11. Re:This is spectacular by ThatDamnMurphyGuy · · Score: 1
      The article said that it could save something like 100,000 barrels of oil a day.
      Lies, Damn Lies and Statistics.
    12. Re:This is spectacular by jZnat · · Score: 1

      And after that, we'll be using a calendar based on how many seconds have passed since a purely arbitrary moment in time!

      Oh...

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    13. Re:This is spectacular by l810c · · Score: 4, Funny
      That would set us back decades.

      It would be the 1970's all over again

    14. Re:This is spectacular by HybridST · · Score: 1
      The article said that it could save something like 100,000 barrels of oil a day.
      And how many barrels a day are currently used by the U.S. Military overseas??
      --
      Ever notice that Cobra Commander sounds an awful lot like Star scream?
    15. Re:This is spectacular by HybridST · · Score: 1
      If that were the case, the government might as well pay you to jerk off to porn.

      That's called Welfare I believe...Get paid for wanking, boozing and drugs!
      --
      Ever notice that Cobra Commander sounds an awful lot like Star scream?
    16. Re:This is spectacular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Working for a company that operates >20,000 MW of electric generation, I have had the opportunity to see the electric load profile for both DST and non-DST days. You can tell the difference in electric consumption. Granted, we're not talking quite the volume you get during the business day, however, our scheduling systems definitely have to take DST into consideration because it affects how many plants are on, and even the cost of your electricity (get to use cheaper coal-fired plants rather than expensive gas). When folks get home from work and it's dark out, guess what, they turn on the lights!!! And we have to ramp up our generators. It will save energy, and heck, you might even save on your electric bill.

    17. Re:This is spectacular by NuShrike · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe they could instead, ban energy inefficient lighting, push more aggressively for solar panels on homes, actually raise CAFE standards, and holy hell end up saving more than a drop in a barrel in the long run!

      Then we could actually dig out of the hole instead of delaying it getting bigger.

      But again, this is B-USA-H. We don't look in the long term for the exit strategy.

    18. Re:This is spectacular by Eristone · · Score: 1

      The government has a job that pays you to jerk off to porn - it's called the FCC...

      (okay okay... back to work for me)

    19. Re:This is spectacular by forty7 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just to nitpick a bit :o)

      The calendar actually has exactly nothing to do with when Jesus died. It's all about when he was born ("Anno Domini" means "In the year of the Lord").

      Of course, things are confused a bit by the fact that the monk who figured it out in the first place got it wrong by a few years; Jesus was born somewhere between 8 BC and 4 BC rather than AD 1.

    20. Re:This is spectacular by onrop · · Score: 1
      But that would be a step backwards for polite society. Didn't you get the political-correctness memo?

      The years before and after Christ are no longer B.C. and A.D.! A.D. is now considered C.E., or the Common Era. B.C. is now B.C.E., or Before the Common Era.

      I mean, sheesh, we can't go around offending anyone that isn't Christian by forcing Christian ideals and philosphies and laws on them! Oh wait....

    21. Re:This is spectacular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      And that would give Bush to re-live those glory days in the Guard.

    22. Re:This is spectacular by Transcendent · · Score: 1

      The increase in demand for employees posessing the special skills needed to fix this problem will subsequently raise the expected salary for software engineers and IT professionals. I'd say this gives us something to toast and look forward to.

      I hope you're not looking forward to ::cough:: ...job security.

    23. Re:This is spectacular by Dont_Shoot · · Score: 1

      Yes and after the problem is fixed we'd all be out of a job again. That would be great.

      --
      Never Underestimate the Power of Stupid People in Large Groups.
    24. Re:This is spectacular by pintomp3 · · Score: 1

      woah, i always thought A.D stood for "After Death". ahh, public school.

    25. Re:This is spectacular by tqft · · Score: 1

      At least the music would be good even if the clothes aren't

      --
      The Singularity is closer than you think
      Quant
    26. Re:This is spectacular by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm young enough to have missed them the first time around. As such, I say why not?

      --
      ± 29 dB
  6. Rollback this. by Seumas · · Score: 1, Troll

    WHY?!

    I, for one, like when DST rolls back. I like it to get dark early in the fall. If we're going to have NINE months of daylight savings time, why even have it at all? Just move the clocks ahead forever.

    I'm not one of these people who get all excited because the sun stays up longer when I get out of work. I like it to be dark by 5:00pm or 6:00pm. It has a unique feel to it rather than getting off work and still having four or five hours of daylight. And I like having it get light earlier in the morning, rather than later.

    The entire point of DST is just retarded. Don't change it. GET RID OF IT. It's 2005. We have these nifty fucking things called ELECTRIC LIGHTS now. You can use them to, like, see when it's dark. It's really fucking amazing.

    OH! And I know what else...! Why don't we just stop with the whole seasons thing and make it summer year round! We surely don't need seasons! And let's alter the clocks so that it's actually always some time between 9am and 5pm every hour of the day! Ooh ooh-- and we should get rid of weekends, too. Weekends cut into productivity!

    1. Re:Rollback this. by building_970 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We have these nifty fucking things called ELECTRIC LIGHTS now. You can use them to, like, see when it's dark. It's really fucking amazing.

      We have this nifty concept called "conservativism," or not wasting electricity, money, and natural resources now. That's the point behind DST: using less electricity and benefitting because of it.

      --
      Area IV, here I am
    2. Re:Rollback this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have these nifty fucking things called ELECTRIC LIGHTS now. You can use them to, like, see when it's dark.

      but if you don't have to use them, we save energy and money. However, I don't see how moving it to the end of November is going to help. The days are already getting noticable shorter by that time.
    3. Re:Rollback this. by mikeboone · · Score: 1

      If we're going to have NINE months of daylight savings time, why even have it at all? Just move the clocks ahead forever.

      Well said. I like DST, so I say we just keep it year-round.

    4. Re:Rollback this. by pmazer · · Score: 1

      Someone's bitter...

    5. Re:Rollback this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point of DST is to keep you from turning on those electric lights.

      Now if the energy savings from that will off-set the need for new VCRs etc, well somehow I doubt it.

      Politicians are stupid.

    6. Re:Rollback this. by Seumas · · Score: 1

      I'll tell you what - you stop driving your fucking SUV to pick up the kids at school and I'll start reading in the dark.

    7. Re:Rollback this. by blincoln · · Score: 1

      The entire point of DST is just retarded. Don't change it. GET RID OF IT. It's 2005. We have these nifty fucking things called ELECTRIC LIGHTS now. You can use them to, like, see when it's dark. It's really fucking amazing.

      No kidding. Maybe I've been having an overly stressful week, but the article summary made me want to go out and kill as many people as possible and impale them on pikes.

      We'll see who's springing forward then, won't we? WON'T WE?!?!?!!!!

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    8. Re:Rollback this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We have these nifty fucking things called ELECTRIC LIGHTS now."

      You do realize that is the point of DST? To save power costs resulting from "ELECTRIC LIGHTS"?

    9. Re:Rollback this. by boarder · · Score: 1

      I both agree and disagree with your post.

      I am from Indiana, where not having DST was the ONLY smart thing they've done (until next year when they finally make the switch to DST). I moved to Cali a few years ago and can honestly say that DST is an absolutely retarded idea, both in practice and theory. Changing clocks twice a year just causes confusion and no longer helps with saving energy (the original reason for the idea). Also, I think it sucks to leave work at 5pm when it is dark (I use mass transport and skateboarding to the train in the dark isn't safe). Having kids go home from school in the dark isn't safe, either (they'll probably be going TO school in the dark regardless).

      On the other hand, though, I love having the extra hours in the day after work. I actually go OUTSIDE and play sports. Yes, I know, exercise is a foreign concept to some /.ers. I played beach volleyball till 8pm and then swam in the ocean for 20 minutes last night... if we stayed on standard time year round, then I couldn't have played so long.

      I propose moving everything to summer's time with no time change. Why change for the winter and why change for just 3 months?

      --
      IANAL, but I play one on /.
    10. Re:Rollback this. by joggle · · Score: 1
      I like it to get dark early in the fall.

      Does this give you any practical advantage though? I like doing outdoor activities after work and it really sucks when the day gets an hour shorter. Not everywhere is well lit you know (like open space areas, large city parks, golf courses, etc). Cycling becomes more dangerous after dark as well.

    11. Re:Rollback this. by rainman_bc · · Score: 2, Informative

      We have these nifty fucking things called ELECTRIC LIGHTS now

      Thing is, I think the point of this bill is to conserve energy dude...

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    12. Re:Rollback this. by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Then why roll it back an hour? Why not roll it back two and save twice as much energy? Or three, even?

      And of course, with more daylight, people certainly aren't going to be driving gas guzzling cars around more than they would in the dark while they go find things to do with the extra daylight.

    13. Re:Rollback this. by Ex+Machina · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      We have this nifty concept called "conservativism," or not wasting electricity, money, and natural resources now. That's the point behind DST: using less electricity and benefitting because of it.

      You forgot the part about hating gays and poor people!

    14. Re:Rollback this. by mehgul · · Score: 1

      I fully agree with you, we should get rid of DST alltogether, everywhere. It screws my biological clock continuously and we already live in a world that is all too artificial.
      And I also prefer it when it's dark in the evening, as I'm particularly affected by late exposure to sunlight, which is exacerbated by being a mediterranean living in Scandinavia. That and having so much changes in the exposure time throughout the year.

      However, I also remember why DST has been put into place: to save energy and oil. And given the current price of oil and the depletion in reserves (even if it there's 100 years or more left, it's still soon), I'd say it's not such a bad idea to save on that.
      All in all, I don't really know... Is there a good solution ?

    15. Re:Rollback this. by nizo · · Score: 1

      We should use this as an opportunity to go to metric time. 10 hours in a day/100 minutes in an hour/100 seconds in a minute. The new second would be about 8.6 current seconds long, but I think a second is too short right now anyway. Heck we could even rename it (centon?). Just think of how many jobs would be created after something like this! I am still working on how to handle metric dates; I am thinking that it might require us to speed up the earth's orbit around the sun so that it is a nice round number (say until there are only 300 days in a year).

    16. Re:Rollback this. by The+FooMiester · · Score: 1

      What of us who cycle TO work? I'd rather cycle to work in the light and home in the dark than vice-versa. There are more groggy people shaving on the way to work breaking the speed limit by an order of magnatude than there are on the way home.

      --
      The previous has been a secret message to my comrades.
    17. Re:Rollback this. by mesach · · Score: 1

      Who is energy dude? is he kinda like that Crying Indian? or Smokey the Bear

      --
      moo.
    18. Re:Rollback this. by tricorn · · Score: 1

      No, your new second would be about .86 old seconds long, so even shorter than it is currently. There are 86,000 seconds/day now; with 10 hours/100 minutes/100 seconds, there would be 100,000 seconds.

    19. Re:Rollback this. by Chosen+Reject · · Score: 1
      not wasting electricity

      Not to be nitpicky, but if the electricity is made and you don't use it, you didn't conserve it, you wasted it. It was there and then went bye-bye without use. That's wasting. You can save money by using less electricity, and you can reduce the amount of electricity produced, but electricity isn't conserved like water.

      Just my $0.002.

      --
      Stop Global Warming!
      Just say no to irreversible processes!
    20. Re:Rollback this. by twofidyKidd · · Score: 1

      Does it need to have a practical advantage? What if we just like how it gets dark early in the fall...

      --


      Hades, PoD: Official Advocate
    21. Re:Rollback this. by Craig+Maloney · · Score: 1

      I'm just relishing the thought of all of these devices that I have that are clever enough to figure out when DST is and isn't supposed to happen, and automatically adjust for it. Now I'm going to have to spend more time figuring out which of these devices don't need to be set ahead/behind. I'm just tickled pink.

      Just repeal the damn thing after all. DST was designed by same idiots who don't understand that consistency is something to be cherished.

      I move that we allow our Congressional leaders the opportunity to fix all of the electronic issues this idiocy will cause.

    22. Re:Rollback this. by rpresser · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you have forgotten that the power companies can measure the total load at any given moment, and turn generators on and off (or just run them faster or slower) to match. If the load is light, less electricity is generated, hence fuel is saved.

    23. Re:Rollback this. by codemangler · · Score: 1

      I think the point of this bill is to conserve energy

      DST might save a little electricity because fewer lights are needed, but it also wastes energy because if people stay out later that means they probably drive more.

    24. Re:Rollback this. by Chosen+Reject · · Score: 1
      and you can reduce the amount of electricity produced

      And so what I said still stands. Of course you can conserve fuel. I never said you couldn't. And I did say "you can reduce the amount of electricity produced". But the point remains, you cannot conserve electricity like you can other things.

      --
      Stop Global Warming!
      Just say no to irreversible processes!
    25. Re:Rollback this. by rpresser · · Score: 1

      Upon rereading your comment, I see that you did indeed say if the electricity is made and you don't use it, you didn't conserve it, you wasted it.. I apologize for missing this the first time around.

      But now I will argue that it is in theory possible to conserve unused already-produced electricity. If an energy storing device, such as a battery or flywheel, or even an appropriate inductance/capacitance, is attached to the circuit, and configured to absorb unused energy from the circuit, then it will not be wasted.

      Since I am not an electrical engineer, this idea is pure handwavium, and I welcome comment on its feasibility. (If it really was feasible, I imagine it would already be in use.)

  7. Death to DST by jjhlk · · Score: 1

    Bah, just kill daylight savings instead. I'll just remember that sometimes 7:00 is darker than I might expect at a different time of the year. As it happens, I constantly forget to change my watch.

    1. Re:Death to DST by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      I agree. DST is retarded and has no real benefit.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    2. Re:Death to DST by badmammajamma · · Score: 1

      Clearly, you do not live in the northern part of the country.

      --
      Any man who afflicts the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstood. -- H. L. Mencken
  8. My own preference by ZoneGray · · Score: 5, Funny

    What I'd prefer is that they passed a law making the hours between 9:00 am and 5:00 pm shorter.

    1. Re:My own preference by robertjw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why not just pass a law that makes a standard work day for salaried employees from 10:00 am to 2:00pm (with the standard hour for lunch).

    2. Re:My own preference by snorklewacker · · Score: 4, Funny

      I work nights, you insensitive clod!

      --
      I am no longer wasting my time with slashdot
    3. Re:My own preference by phasm42 · · Score: 1
      99% of people have more than the average number of legs.
      OT, but I love your sig. A perfect example of deceptive statistics.
      --
      "No one likes working in a hamster wheel, and your shop smells of cedar shavings from here." - TaleSpinner
    4. Re:My own preference by Surt · · Score: 1

      Crap, now I have to wake up in time to make it to work by 10?

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    5. Re:My own preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Knowing the gov't, they'd shorten the 12-1pm hour to 10 minutes.

    6. Re:My own preference by thatgun · · Score: 1

      We'd all be working nights if that were to pass.

      As is every companies' mantra, "Work harder for less money..."

    7. Re:My own preference by zx75 · · Score: 1

      Yes well, self-sacrifice is the only true virtue. Those who are able must contribute everything they can for those who are not. That is why you must sacrifice by working longer hours for the greater good of the United States of America!

      (well, thats how it always sounds to those of us who live across the border).

      --
      This is not a sig.
    8. Re:My own preference by Council · · Score: 1

      We don't need more business-hour confusion.

      I remember, while working overnight security in a college dorm, having a conversation with a very confused pizza place manager. I was explaining to him that the time changed at 2:00 AM; the clock jumps from 1:59:59 to 3:00. So I wanted to know whether they were closing at the 'normal' 3:00 AM (that is, 4:00 AM), or the 'actual' 3:00 AM (which seemed like 2:00 AM).

      He angrily insisted that they were going to stay open just as long after midnight as they usually did, and they would close at 3:00 AM. I tried to explain that these two things were mutually impossible, but he was having none of it.

      I talked to him a couple hours later. He sheepishy related that he had recieved an angry call from the main office asking why he was still opened at 3:30 AM.

      --
      xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
  9. DIY by djtripp · · Score: 1

    I know some systems have a ton on clocks, so if it happens, I'm sure someone will figure our how to do it en mass. Ultimately, the responsibility lies with the user.

    --
    "This is you left and that's your left. This is your right and that's your right. You're gonna die!
  10. One word: *groan*. by DuckDuckBOOM! · · Score: 1
    Every server and app I maintain is going to need OS and class library mods. Thanks a lot, guys.

    DDB

    --
    Life is like surrealism: if you have to have it explained to you, you can't afford it.
    1. Re:One word: *groan*. by rwade · · Score: 1

      Sure this sucks for your jobs? And why is it that it sucks?

      You have to manipulate machines to accomodate human's daytime-loving nature. In fact, you should love situations like this: the only reason that you have a job is to make machines accomodate human psychology.

    2. Re:One word: *groan*. by ummit · · Score: 1
      Every server and app I maintain is going to need OS and class library mods.

      They're all that poorly written, that they didn't (a) centralize this functionality via a facility which (b) could be dynamically updated? What braindead software are you running?

    3. Re:One word: *groan*. by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1
      They're all that poorly written, that they didn't (a) centralize this functionality via a facility which (b) could be dynamically updated?

      Or just use localtime() and mktime(), or Windows native equivalents, when possible?

    4. Re:One word: *groan*. by gronofer · · Score: 1
      The zone information needs to be stored somewhere, so you have to update the zoneinfo files or the environment variables or whatever you are using.

      Better: keep everything in UTC. Don't trust time keeping systems controlled by politicians.

  11. Nitpickers take note! by Verminator · · Score: 1
    It's Daylight Saving Time.

    Can't believe I'm posting this.

    --
    "The more corrupt the state, the more it legislates." - Tacitus
  12. They should do away with 24-hour clock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    US should reaffirm its innovation and move out of the old systems, like the metric one. They should break up the day into 100 hours instead of stupid 24. Potential benefits:

    - Easier to calculate amount of hours worked.
    - Working 9 to 5 becomes a breeze.
    - With minimum wage tied up to the hour everyone could be rich and retire early.

    1. Re:They should do away with 24-hour clock by neuroxmurf · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but working from 9/100 to 5/100, and then having 0.04 of a day (57.6 minutes) to rest before I have to go back to work again doesn't sound like a "breeze" to me.

      Actually, it sounds a lot like my current schedule... oh, wait....

    2. Re:They should do away with 24-hour clock by generic-man · · Score: 4, Funny

      They should break up the day into 100 hours instead of stupid 24. Potential benefits:
      - Working 9 to 5 becomes a breeze.


      Are you insane? With a 100 hour day, working "9 to 5" becomes a 96-hour day, equivalent to 23.04 of your Classic American Non-Metric Hours. That's no good.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    3. Re:They should do away with 24-hour clock by rickst13 · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming he meant 9 - 17.

      Heck, should we get rid of AM and PM while we are at it? That seems to just cause confusion as well.

    4. Re:They should do away with 24-hour clock by xferboy · · Score: 1

      Didn't you see "Talking to Americans", Canada has already done this, but it was a 10 hour day mind you.

    5. Re:They should do away with 24-hour clock by kerrbear · · Score: 1

      US should reaffirm its innovation and move out of the old systems, like the metric one. They should break up the day into 100 hours instead of stupid 24. Potential benefits:

      Why don't we all just go to Internet Time? We will just get used to it eventually. The only thing I can't figure out about it is why it does not have decimal points for finer timing.

    6. Re:They should do away with 24-hour clock by jZnat · · Score: 1

      But things would be split into 10-hour periods:
      AM
      BM
      CM
      DM ...

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    7. Re:They should do away with 24-hour clock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did BM today ... but I don't think it had anything to do with time.

    8. Re:They should do away with 24-hour clock by nyekulturniy · · Score: 1

      The French Revolutionary government tried to introduce a 10-hour clock, with noon at 5 p.m. I can get the Revolutionary time fiddling with Excel.

      --
      Nyekulturniy... Proudly confusing readers and editors since 1981!
  13. I can solve this for $200 an hour by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    now all we have to do is hire lots and lots of programmers to go thru all our code and find the bugs - otherwise civilization will end. ... yawn ...

    seriously, anyone ever thought this is all just an elaborate ploy by Sun and Microsoft to force users to upgrade their OS so it will "deal with the DST problem"?

    Because right now, nobody seems to be interested in Longhorn or other "new" OS as they have no "killer app".

    What better application than one provided by the DC elites at their beck and call?

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:I can solve this for $200 an hour by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      No, it's a secret ploy by the folks who manufacture cheap clocks that sync with the WWV atomic clock signal to force us to buy new ones....

      Alternately, it's a plot by idiots who think that it will magically save electricity. It probably won't, at least in the long term. The California study showed that there could be -slight- savings, but when estimating something as complex as the power usage of an entire state, there's a lot of guesswork involved, and more importantly, our power usage is changing. If it made a huge difference in the 70s and a small difference in 2000, it could easily have a -negative- impact in teny or twenty years.

      IMHO, the long term problem is that there's no way this could work in an era where all those people with an extra hour of daylight in the evening will switch from being in an office building with one air conditioner to a hundred houses with a hundred air conditioners. As we become more dependent on air-conditioning and heating, these power conservation "tricks" will become less and less effective, and at a certain level of prevalence of A/C and heat, will likely become detrimental.

      Seriously, why can't we all just switch to UTC/GMT. The whole question of optimizing the time so that 9-to-5 is at a particular time relative to the sun is idiotic. If it's more efficient for the work day to be from 10-to-6, give tax incentives for employers that have a different work day. Besides, isn't giving tax incentives to businesses the Republican way? :-D

      Sheesh.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  14. Software yes, hardware no. by fixer007 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't think it will be a huge deal to patch all of the software out there that relies on this. The main problem will be things like VCRs, TVs, watches and such that change the time for you automatically.

    It's nice to see the American government coming up with a solution like this instead of concentrating on and suggesting alternate energies.

    Really warms the ol' cockles of the heart.

    1. Re:Software yes, hardware no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's nice to see the American government coming up with a solution like this instead of concentrating on and suggesting alternate energies.

      Why is it the role of government? Why doesn't some public/private firm develop this and make bajillions of dollars?!? Because most of these energies require more energy to make than they produce. . .

    2. Re:Software yes, hardware no. by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      "I don't think it will be a huge deal to patch all of the software out there that relies on this. The main problem will be things like VCRs"

      VCRs? Hello, the 21st Century is calling. TiVos and other DVRs won't suffer from this because they access servers that update the times on the units.

      A VCR....pffff. :)

      Here you go.... www.tivo.com

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    3. Re:Software yes, hardware no. by n7ytd · · Score: 1

      My VCR, when I enable the function, sets the time to whatever the local PBS station says, DST included. No problem there.

    4. Re:Software yes, hardware no. by Fjornir · · Score: 1

      Hell, most VCRs sync off the time signal coming down your cable anyways...

      --
      I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
    5. Re:Software yes, hardware no. by eln · · Score: 1

      Because there's no real prospect for profit in the short to medium term by developing alternate fuels. When something needs to be done for the public good that doesn't have immediate profit potential, the only way it will get done is by putting government money into it.

    6. Re:Software yes, hardware no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that why those 30 second commercials seem to get longer and longer?

    7. Re:Software yes, hardware no. by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      "Hell, most VCRs sync off the time signal coming down your cable anyways..."

      And modern TVs (have the ability to) sync the time from over-the-air broadcasts. Generally speaking. Like with computers, there are still plug-and-play issues involved that sometime complicate such matters.

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    8. Re:Software yes, hardware no. by okmijnuhb · · Score: 1

      The subject is conservation of energy, the proposal is quite laughable when one examines America's energy conserving habits, beginning with the passenger trucks we use for daily travel.

    9. Re:Software yes, hardware no. by SoundGuyNoise · · Score: 1
      A lot of newer VCRs are capable of getting a time/date signal via their PBS station.

      But I think that's just a setup feature, not an automatic update. There would still be the issue of the VCR automatically adjusting for DST.

      --
      You never expect irony, do you?
      Want to be a professional wrestler? Visit www.iyfwrestling.com
      @iyfwrestling
  15. enough time? by EraserMouseMan · · Score: 1

    Most large mission critical systems already support this sort of thing. And if your mission critical system doesn't, I suppose you could always temporarily fake being in a different time-zone till a permanent solution is developed.

  16. If we're going to change the system... by AlgebraicRing · · Score: 1

    JESUS CHRIST, just get rid of the damn time change completely. While we're at it, let's switch the whole world to be in the same time-zone. Computers do it, why can't people?

    1. Re:If we're going to change the system... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Because half of the world would be on permanent night shift.

    2. Re:If we're going to change the system... by codemangler · · Score: 1

      While I agree 99% with this, the problem is that using UTC would cause it to switch from Monday to Tuesday in the middle of the day (at least where I live), which could be confusing. To get around this, maybe we could refer to our days coloquially as beginning at dawn, and use utc time and date for anything semi-official. I keep my deskop computer on UTC, which took all of a day or two to get used to.

    3. Re:If we're going to change the system... by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      Already do that in the military. It's called zulu time. Times written as 2300Z are easily understood throughout the world. Then it's lima for local time. so in california (ignoring DST, which REALLY fucks this up), which is GMT -8, it'd be 1500L and 2300Z. Really, really easy. This way there is no confusion when the bombers in GMT+3 and the submarines in GMT-9 are trying to coordinate their attack on disneyland while talking to their leaders on the radio.

      I personally prefer just using both timezones. Use zulu for any sort of coordination outside of the time zone you're in, or to help in travelling. Then just take a look at the local time to figure out when the sun's going to come up and when it's time to go out to bars, etc. That's what I do :)

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
  17. Yay! Changeover means finally more jobs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For indians and russians that is!

  18. Just use GMT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most true "time critical" applications should not be using adjusted time as a rule, and run off GMT, and a 24 hour clock.

  19. Abolish DST by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I used to live in a non-DST state. And you know what? It was great, not having to wake up an hour earlier or go to bed an hour earlier, and not have one or two time-keeping devices with the wrong time a month later. It was a real headache this year because I had to travel, and keeping track of time zones is hard enough without worrying about DST.

    Heck, I'm not a believer in time zones, either. Let's adopt one time standard and adjust schedules accordingly. I don't need to be tricked into waking up in the morning.

    1. Re:Abolish DST by javaxman · · Score: 1
      Please o god o god o yes. DST is evil, stupid, wrong, lame, and there just aren't enough words for how much of a PITA it is for programmers who have enough of a hard time handling an already screwed-up over-complicated and downright inaccurate time/calendar system.

      I don't even want to think about what this means for everyone's VCR/DVD/microwave/coffe pot/etc clocks. Have fun remembering how to set those twice a year, grandma!

      Now that you mention it, the time zones are a tad arbitrary, aren't they? If you're aiming for a universal time that the sun rises at, why not have a new time zone every 10 or 30 minutes ?

    2. Re:Abolish DST by Admiral+Ackbar+8 · · Score: 1

      Imagine trying to drive East or West. I agree that it would be cool to do this, but you would pretty much have no idea what time it was most of the time. I am late everywhere so it doesn't matter to me, but some people might care.

    3. Re:Abolish DST by scheveningen · · Score: 1

      one time zone? That would be fun, having the US switch to GMT. While you're at it, please also switch to the metric system, 240V, PAL and a dozen other "standards". Maybe I'll then switch to english and wear tennis shoes.

    4. Re:Abolish DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We discussed it and respectfully decline.

    5. Re:Abolish DST by rwade · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Those potential sacrifices, waking up an hour later or going to bed an hour earlier are more than made up by the availability of sun later in the day to allow traditional summertime activities.

      So for the slashdot folks: using computers outside; reading about computers outside; watching DVDs outside..etc.

    6. Re:Abolish DST by Dr.+Transparent · · Score: 1

      With you on UTC, Metric, and maybe 240V. PAL sucks no less than NTSC so far as I can figure. Let's just mandate that all broadcasts everywhere have to be 1080p.

    7. Re:Abolish DST by cnettel · · Score: 1

      Unless you've got a really nice screen, less sunlight is an advantage for the /. outdoor activities...

    8. Re:Abolish DST by maglor_83 · · Score: 1

      I say abolish Standard Time instead. I'd much rather it be lighter after work - especially during winter.

    9. Re:Abolish DST by rwade · · Score: 1

      You disregard the most fabulous aspect of being outside: being seen. Surely if everyone were seen slashdotting outside there would be so much more of the ladies.

    10. Re:Abolish DST by Amouth · · Score: 1, Interesting

      i have always agreed with this..

      it is stuipd for every one to have a 9-5 job.. i have to deal with people over seas all the time and it has gotten to the point were i have 5 clocks on my wall - one for each place.. so i don't wake them up.. ijust can't kep track of how many hours ahead are they and what time is it there

      if we all used the same damn time it would make sooooo much more sence.. the fact that you can have a flight and you have to set your watch BACK becuse you landed before you left..

      and when you live near a time zone switch.. dealing with what time stores are open.. it is crazy

      and DST does nothing but make it more confusing.. hell the only time i know it changes is becuse my computer tells me. and honestly from the looks of it.. that might not work right (at least for a while)

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    11. Re:Abolish DST by robertjw · · Score: 1

      Those potential sacrifices, waking up an hour later or going to bed an hour earlier are more than made up by the availability of sun later in the day to allow traditional summertime activities.

      Thing is, where I live the days get significantly longer in the summer anyway, so we naturally get more daylight. The time when I really want afternoon daylight is during the winter when the days are short. I'm for setting the time to DST and leaving it there. If some of the kids are going to school in the dark the schools can change their hours of operation. Around here most people just drive their kids to school anyway, so who cares if they go in the dark?

    12. Re:Abolish DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to live in a sane state (Indiana) until our new illustrious governor Daniels changed us to DST. My props go out to Arizona, the last state with no DST. What exactly is saved anyway? Ignorant.

    13. Re:Abolish DST by Mars2020 · · Score: 1

      For the love of God, we put a man on the Moon and we find it challanging to keep track of daylight savings time??? Get over it, we'll survive.

    14. Re:Abolish DST by scheveningen · · Score: 1

      Actually, I have no strong preference for any particular "standard". It just bugs me that there are so many to choose from.

      PAL sucks a little less than NTSC in terms of resolution; I would happily switch to NTSC if it could become the only format in the world. 1080 would of course be better.

    15. Re:Abolish DST by quantum+bit · · Score: 1

      PAL sucks because in order to air content that was originally 24fps progressive, the audio has to be sped up to keep it in sync and everything is too high pitched.

    16. Re:Abolish DST by ookabooka · · Score: 1

      i have to deal with people over seas all the time and it has gotten to the point were i have 5 clocks on my wall - one for each place.. so i don't wake them up.. ijust can't kep track of how many hours ahead are they and what time is it there

      Actually, it would be more confusing, because now even though everyone is on the same time zone, you would now have the responsibility of remember when sunrise and sunset occurs for each timezone. If it is 10AM in greenwich(sp?), and therefore also "10AM" in the midwest, is it ok to call a business executive in the midwest?

      --
      If you are about to mod me down, keep in mind that this post was most likely sarcastic.
    17. Re:Abolish DST by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 1

      They kinda did hundreds of years ago. Early train timetables in the United Kingdom had to account for the different timezones of towns merely a hundred miles apart. It was the train network which eventually caused a single timezone to be adopted.

    18. Re:Abolish DST by javaxman · · Score: 3, Interesting
      to be sure, I was joking. Really, I was pointing out the stupidity of time zones in general, as the parent post had.

      Just because it ( usually! ) takes a while to cross a time zone now doesn't change the fact that your clock is no longer correct after flying cross-country, even though it has kept correct track of the number of seconds which have past since you left. A clock that just shows GMT is always correct for that locallity, it's the local time elsewhere that's been shifted so that, for whatever reason '8:00 AM" is always morning, even Australia.

      That said, I understand why it's done, but it's a convention, and a completely arbitrary one at that.

      The idea that there are several places where you can drive a half-mile down the road and have to change your clock to support such an arbitrary convention is more than illogical and annoying. It's downright stupid. I can't imagine what folks do who live near a time zone demarcation line do, although I know what large cities in such a position do- they arbitrarily choose one zone or the other, which just shows how dumb the whole thing is.

    19. Re:Abolish DST by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1
      and when you live near a time zone switch.. dealing with what time stores are open.. it is crazy

      And how exactly does this get easier with only one time? Right now, wherever you go, you know the local Best Buy will probably close at ~9 pm on weekdays. If you know roughly what time it is where you are (within an hour at least) you know if the stores will be open or not.

      With one time zone, one place you are at, the stores might close at 8 PM. A thousand miles east of there most places would probably close at 5 pm. Now you have to ask 'what time do the stores close around here' wherever you go. That sounds a hell of a lot more confusing to me.

    20. Re:Abolish DST by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

      I don't think that could work. Because you'd have people in different areas that wouldn't be able to collaborate "during business hours" because business hours wouldn't be undefined. For example, my 9-5 would be someone elses 13-22. There are several other reasons why that's just probably not practical.

      That said, I do like the idea of GMT, or Swatches "internet time idea". Heh.

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    21. Re:Abolish DST by Amouth · · Score: 0

      actualy it would make it easier.. instead of calcing it all out i would say "HI i work 9-5" the would be "Hi i work 4-12" now we know we over lap 4-5 quite simple realy.. but to do it right you need to use 24 hour time none of this am pm crap.. it wouldnt' make sence any more anyways

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    22. Re:Abolish DST by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Those potential sacrifices, waking up an hour later or going to bed an hour earlier are more than made up by the availability of sun later in the day to allow traditional summertime activities.

      Please! I live in Washington State. We have like 7 hours of sunlight, max, during the winter. They can turn the clocks forward, turn them back, turn them upside-down and watch the gears spill out, but I can guarantee that you can't do "summertime" activities during the winter here.

    23. Re:Abolish DST by morganjharvey · · Score: 1

      It was great, not having to wake up an hour earlier or go to bed an hour earlier,

      Not having to leave the bar an hour earlier...

    24. Re:Abolish DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We" did not put a man on the moon; actual freakin' rocket scientists with large budgets did. I don't think you can refer to them in the same context as the average American's affinity for math.

    25. Re:Abolish DST by fontkick · · Score: 1

      By that logic why don't we just abolish different times altogether. From now on, the time is precisely 12:03. AM or PM, take your pick. Much more convenient, no watches neeeded, all deadlines condensed to "is it due before or after 12:03?" While we're at it lets get rid of Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday and Sunday and just deal with the big three - M, F and Sat. There are also too many temperatures to deal with. Can't we just have maybe 5 or 6?

    26. Re:Abolish DST by aussersterne · · Score: 1

      Time zones are not so much for behavioral guidance as they are userful for communication--it's a kind of shorthand, a pre-made set of calculations.

      Without a timezone, you can't say "I go to bed every night about 8:00 pm" on an Internet forum because any listed time is meaningless without also listing your latitude and logitude for everyone else, which most people don't know and fewer people will relate in any meaningful way to real time.

      You could of course say "I got to bed every night about two hours after sundown" but then you'd need not only latitude and logitude but also altitude and other pieces of information.

      But time zones give us a shorthand, pre-computed way for explaining to people across vast distances when things happen during the average day.

      --
      STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    27. Re:Abolish DST by coaxial · · Score: 1

      I used to live in a non-DST state

      Someone's from Indiana, the most backassed timezone system in the country. Either that or Arizona.

      Heck, I'm not a believer in time zones, either. Let's adopt one time standard and adjust schedules accordingly.

      China does that. Everyone is on Beijing time.

      Timezones are a natural phenomena. If you use the traditional definition of noon as when the sun is at the highest point in the sky, then noon does occur at differnent points in the planets rotation every place on the planet. Every 15 degrees, is off by approximately 60 minutes.

      I'm no fan of the current timezone and daylight savings time systems. The TZs should be redrawn according to the planet. Daylight savings, while I personally like the daylight, isn't the how the planet's rotation works. Yet, I know we're stuck with this dumb system.

      I don't need to be tricked into waking up in the morning.

      Well you will be when you have to wake up at 3am, since it's no longer "morning". You don't have be "tricked" now, because your circadian rhythm says "wake up shortly after sunrise."

    28. Re:Abolish DST by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      PAL is only good in that compared to NTSC, it's much closer to the resolutions available on computer monitors. So ripping TV from PAL produces better results than ripping from NTSC... but you're right. Standardising on 1080p or any HDTV standard would be better than using either one.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    29. Re:Abolish DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can guarantee that you can't do "summertime" activities during the winter here.

      Now there's a shocker. You can't do summertime activities during the winter? Oh what a cruel, twisted world we live in!

    30. Re:Abolish DST by mikiN · · Score: 1

      More suggestions for time:

      Always at 4:20
      or
      3 AM Eternally

      --
      The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
    31. Re:Abolish DST by 2Paranoid · · Score: 1

      Yes! Yes! Yes! I have been saying this for years. It brings a tear to my eye just knowing that someone else agrees with me.

    32. Re:Abolish DST by Maestro4k · · Score: 1

      The idea that there are several places where you can drive a half-mile down the road and have to change your clock to support such an arbitrary convention is more than illogical and annoying. It's downright stupid. I live very near the border between Eastern and Central time so I have some experience with this. Amusingly there's a bridge going up the mountain on the old highway where the time changes in the middle of it. It's not a very long bridge so it takes an hour to cross it one way and a negative hour the other. I can't imagine what folks do who live near a time zone demarcation line do Since the change occurs mostly in the mountains near here it's not a big deal. There are areas that are technically Central Time but they go to school or work in the city on the Eastern Time side of the mountain so they just go by Eastern Time. It's not a big hassle, more amusing than anything.

    33. Re:Abolish DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now:
      Timezone 1 guy: "How about 8 am?"
      Timezone 2 guy: "Um, what time is that here, uh.. 2 am I think? No, how about later in the day, like 8 am my time?"
      T1G: "that's about 2 pm here, should be good."
      T2G: "Ok"

      If everyone was on the same time, but worked different hours:
      T1G: "What time is good for you? I work 13-23"
      T2G: "I work 19 - 03, how about 20?"
      T1G: "Ok"

      To me that seems a lot simpler, and you don't have to worry about getting the 'timezone difference + (or -) my time' wrong

    34. Re:Abolish DST by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      and the alternatives being?

      a> everyone keeps the same time the world over - "hey what time is the meeting? At 19:00 UTC. Ok, that's like in the morning, right?"
      b> everyone keeps whatever time they please - "the meeting is @ 8, but in smallvile. So that's like 7:35 our time."
      c> no clocks, no calendars, anarchy! "When is the meeting? What, are you fucking stupid!? I'm going to beat you to death with your own shoe!"

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    35. Re:Abolish DST by Amouth · · Score: 0

      maybe it is jsut in my mind that it would make more sence.. to have everyone use the same time.. instead of using the same numbers but with diffrent meaning.. to me time is a constant not something that needs a layer of confusion added to it to make people feel good..

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    36. Re:Abolish DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Around here most people just drive their kids to school anyway, so who cares if they go in the dark?

      wow, what the fuck is _your_ problem?
      where is "around here"? Hamptons?
      listen dumbass, there are plenty of people that can't chauffeur their kids around to school back and forth
      my kids, and most on our block, take the bus
      it is dumbasses like you who blaze through the neighborhood @ 7am in the dark, or blow past school busses picking up dor dropping off kids
      bet if you hit a kid on your way to work you would find a way to make it her fault and just keep going
      yeah, you! I've seen you in your little shit-box toyota driving around like you are the only one on the planet -- you self-abosrbed little fuck-wit

    37. Re:Abolish DST by javaxman · · Score: 1
      b> everyone keeps whatever time they please - "the meeting is @ 8, but in smallvile. So that's like 7:35 our time."

      Isn't that basically the current system? I mean, it's less extreme, but it's "the meeting is at 8, but in Jersey. So that's like 5 AM our time."... this makes more sense ? Depending on what _county_ you are in, if you live in one state ( I think Ohio? ) you may or may not follow DST , so in a very real way, this is the system.

      Option A "everyone keeps the same time the world over" is of course the one that I and the parent post were talking about, and really, "morning" being 19:00 UTC wouldn't be a confusing concept for someone who stayed in the same place a lot. Actually, you can presumably always convert local time to UTC, so this is in a sense what we do except we have local time _also_. Why have the local time at all, though?

      Clearly, your choice in this area all depends on the extent of your mobility. If you never travel more than a hundred miles, it makes sense in a certain way ( if you like A.M. times in the morning ) to have lots of little time zones, as another poster on this thread actually pointed out really was the case in Great Britan not that long ago. The reason they consolidated those time zones? The introduction of rail travel.

    38. Re:Abolish DST by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      >Isn't that basically the current system?

      What I was getting at was no geographic standardization. Smallville is the next town east, and they keep their clocks 25 minutes faster. Their standard for what is 12:00 is when the sun is highest in the sky. The next town beyond that is 43 minutes, they like it that 7:00 is sunrise, all year round. In between is dorkville, where they happen to decide that they will keep the exact same time as Paris, France -- why? Because the mayor says so -- he was elected on that platform

      I don't disagree that timezones are a pain in the ass, but my point was that there aren't many viable alternatives. One universal standard time for everyone to use is logical, but will probably never happen while humans live on a planet that rotates as it revolves around the sun

      People are not going to easily move to a universal time and adjust their concept of 'local time'. Lots of social inertia there. How many times would the clocktower chime!? When I roll over in the morning to hit the snooze alarm, how am I going to get a sense of what time it is when it says '22:35'?

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    39. Re:Abolish DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about I go to bed at 3:00-5 (pronounced "three minus five"), indicating 3 AM GMT, adjusted locally for EST to five hours prior. It's just as short as (and more descriptive and easier to remember than) 22:00 EST

    40. Re:Abolish DST by javaxman · · Score: 1
      My point is that the current system doesn't exactly have 'geographic standardization' as it is.

      Check out this map of time zones that I found. It's not like they follow any sort of standard pattern, really. People just pick whatever's useful for where they live, regardless of which side of some imaginary line they live on.

      People are not going to easily move to a universal time and adjust their concept of 'local time'. Lots of social inertia there. How many times would the clocktower chime!? When I roll over in the morning to hit the snooze alarm, how am I going to get a sense of what time it is when it says '22:35'?

      I'm not going to disagree with you on that one, but it's just that : social inertia. If everyone was doing a lot of flying around or traveling east-to-west on high-speed trains, I'm guessing we'd be a lot more open to just using UTC and not messing with our 'local' clocks so much. Just a guess, though, people tend to be really, really, stupidly suck in their ways. If it was always 22:35 first thing in the morning, you'd know that meant first thing in the morning- how did you learn that "8:00" meant first thing in the morning? You learned it. You just don't want to learn something different, which is reasonable, really, although it does create this silly "it's a different time here than it is there" situation.

    41. Re:Abolish DST by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      Yes, I agree that timezones are not geograpically uniform. But, people within a geograpically-based timezone can more or less count on 'standardized' timekeeping within the established area.

      If you know where someone is located on the timezone map, you can reasonably expect to know what time they think it is there (except, of course, where they choose to ignore which side of the zone line they are or the complications that arise when they don't observe DST).

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    42. Re:Abolish DST by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      The great thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from!

    43. Re:Abolish DST by potat0man · · Score: 1

      Mainland China is only one timezone.

  20. Hype it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's hype it like Y2K, and we're into another IT boom!

  21. So it's all saved now? by jfengel · · Score: 1

    Now going to have more Daylight Savings Time than non-DST. I find that ironic.

  22. Answers by DanThe1Man · · Score: 5, Funny

    Badly. No.

    Score yourself at home. How did you do?

  23. The Sun Times is biased by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think they have an inherent conflict of interest on this issue and I don't think they're in a position to comment on this either way.

  24. When in doubt ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... run in circles, scream, and shout

  25. I know how I'll handle it... by dasdrewid · · Score: 1

    ...the same way I've always handled it: by forgetting about it and doing nothing until I show up for work an hour late (well, an hour and fifteen minutes late, more precisely...)

    Acutally, that only used to be true. Now that I've got a cell phone that automagically updates it's time from the network, I just set my clocks to it whenever they get a bit or an hour off and forget about the whole damn thing.

    --
    No trespassing. Violators will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
    1. Re:I know how I'll handle it... by F452 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Now if there were only a way to automagically delete all occurrences of the word "automagically." What are you: Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer? Does our world frighten and confuse you? Your cell phone updates from the network because of software. There aren't little demons in there doing it.

    2. Re:I know how I'll handle it... by mikiN · · Score: 1

      Well, there might be little daemons doing it when more cellphones start using Unix-like OSes.

      --
      The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
    3. Re:I know how I'll handle it... by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
      From the Jargon File:

      Automagically: Automatically, but in a way that, for some reason (typically because it is too complicated, or too ugly, or perhaps even too trivial), the speaker doesn't feel like explaining to you.
    4. Re:I know how I'll handle it... by F452 · · Score: 1

      So it's in the jargon file. That doesn't mean it's not an annoying phrase to use. Why not just say *automatically.* If you don't feel like explaining it, don't. You can still use "automatic." "Automagically" is one of those cutesy words that we'd do better without. But that's strictly in my humble opinion, of course.

    5. Re:I know how I'll handle it... by Madoc+Owain · · Score: 1

      Sadly, that won't work if you have a Microsoft-powered cell phone/PDA combo. Apparently, allowing the cell phone network to change your time as you cross timezones will screw up Outlook badly enough (more CPU work required?) they decided against adding that functionality.

      Thanks, Microsoft, for ensuring I never buy a cell phone with your OS in it.

      M.O.
      http://www.madocowain.com/
      http://www.playmaille.com/

  26. usa by sewagemaster · · Score: 1, Funny

    since this is a US thing, will the change affect canada as well? (ok, before BC and Ontario become part of the US while Quebec splits off from the rest of Canada? ;)

    1. Re:usa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn I wish the US could annex BC. I love Vancouver and would freaking love to live there, but I can't stand the thought of emmigrating to Canada. I'd have to make fun of myself way to much.

    2. Re:usa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the US ever annexed BC, I would go insane with rage, as I am sure the rest of BC would. Not everyone wants to have anything to do with your nation.

    3. Re:usa by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      "since this is a US thing, will the change affect canada as well? (ok, before BC and Ontario become part of the US while Quebec splits off from the rest of Canada? ;)"

      Ontario won't join the U.S. until the U.S. pays off the debt owed to the descendants of the Loyalists who had their properties confiscated during the Revolutionary War and sold off to profit the new government. In the Treaty of Paris that formally recognized the independence of the United States from the British Empire guaranteed that those Loyalists would be repaid. Guess what? They still haven't. And that fuels the semi-anti-American sentiment that is held there. Granted, that *anti-Americanism* typically manifests itself no more than off-hand remarks (and since 2000, especially aimed at Bush), which even many Southerners still bent about the Civil War often makes about the Federal Government.

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    4. Re:usa by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      Ontario won't join the U.S. until the U.S. pays off the debt owed to the descendants of the Loyalists who had their properties confiscated during the Revolutionary War and sold off to profit the new government. In the Treaty of Paris that formally recognized the independence of the United States from the British Empire guaranteed that those Loyalists would be repaid. Guess what? They still haven't.

      Considering that the other side of that deal was that you loyalists promised you would return slaves you had captured (or liberated) to their "rightful" "owners," I have to say that I'm pretty happy that particular aspect of the Treaty of Paris isn't being enforced.

    5. Re:usa by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      "Considering that the other side of that deal was that you loyalists promised you would return slaves you had captured (or liberated) to their "rightful" "owners," I have to say that I'm pretty happy that particular aspect of the Treaty of Paris isn't being enforced."

      I'm not claiming to be a Loyalist. I'm a Californian. My ancestors fought on the Revolutionary side. However, since the Loyalists did have their homes stolen from them, they deserve compensation. Especially since it is part of an existing treaty. And even more so because the issue complicates Canadian-American relations and ultimately retards any chance of unification. Not to mention all the debate on Constitutional reform that such an opportunity would bring as well.

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    6. Re:usa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no guarantee in the treaty that the loyalists would be repaid. The treaty says that congress shall earnestly recommend that the states pay restitution. Whether or not they did I don't know.
      Here's the text of article 5 of the treaty:

      It is agreed that Congress shall earnestly recommend it to the legislatures of the respective states to provide for the restitution of all estates, rights, and properties, which have been confiscated belonging to real British subjects; and also of the estates, rights, and properties of persons resident in districts in the possession on his Majesty's arms and who have not borne arms against the said United States. And that persons of any other decription shall have free liberty to go to any part or parts of any of the thirteen United States and therein to remain twelve months unmolested in their endeavors to obtain the restitution of such of their estates, rights, and properties as may have been confiscated; and that Congress shall also earnestly recommend to the several states a reconsideration and revision of all acts or laws regarding the premises, so as to render the said laws or acts perfectly consistent not only with justice and equity but with that spirit of conciliation which on the return of the blessings of peace should universally prevail. And that Congress shall also earnestly recommend to the several states that the estates, rights, and properties, of such last mentioned persons shall be restored to them, they refunding to any persons who may be now in possession the bona fide price (where any has been given) which such persons may have paid on purchasing any of the said lands, rights, or properties since the confiscation.
      And it is agreed that all persons who have any interest in confiscated lands, either by debts, marriage settlements, or otherwise, shall meet with no lawful impediment in the prosecution of their just rights.

    7. Re:usa by skidv · · Score: 1

      since the Loyalists did have their homes stolen from them, they deserve compensation

      Think of it as enforcing the Supreme Court eminent domain ruling 230 years early.

    8. Re:usa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Dangit! Mod points expired yesterday.

      Freakin' hilarious!

  27. What are the consequences? by DaedalusLogic · · Score: 1

    Of just getting rid of it? I'd like to do that. If you aren't going to have it on an equinox, what is the point? Though I understand the latitude bias of the location of our country means that the equinox doesn't really mean we're getting equal sun and darkness at any point in the year.

  28. DST is artifical anyway by nurb432 · · Score: 0

    And isnt needed.

    And before you say 'well we save money by turning out the lights earlier in our office'.. you still have 8 hours with the lights on.. Wont matter the time window...

    Its all a farce. So what it gets dark earler? It also gets light earlier the next morning.. Sheesh.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:DST is artifical anyway by AuMatar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But earlier in the morning I can't enjoy it- I'm at work. By placing it at the end of the day, I can still have some time out in the sunlight after work ends. There's a lot of activities people enjoy that are difficult to do in the dark. For people with seasonal depression, this is especially important. If you were to kill DST, you'd probably see a raise in people taking depression medication and suicides that year.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    2. Re:DST is artifical anyway by pclminion · · Score: 1
      And before you say 'well we save money by turning out the lights earlier in our office'.. you still have 8 hours with the lights on.. Wont matter the time window...

      Except that this moves the time window to include more daylight hours, so you don't need to have your lights on. At least that is the theory.

      Personally, I think the clocks should stay constant, and society should shift its working hours according to the season. As winter approaches, people start going to work earlier, so they can come home in the daylight hours. Of course, that's NEVER going to happen.

    3. Re:DST is artifical anyway by fishbowl · · Score: 1



      "Except that this moves the time window to include more daylight hours, so you don't need to have your lights on. At least that is the theory."

      Even if you're among the few whose offices have windows, you still run the climate control and the lights. Most places I've worked run them 24/7 anyway.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    4. Re:DST is artifical anyway by pla · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Except that this moves the time window to include more daylight hours, so you don't need to have your lights on. At least that is the theory.

      Except that in practice, I have never, ever seen a place of business actually turn off the lights and depend on what comes through the window.

      Quite the opposite, in fact - In rooms with a lot of windows ("Front" offices, for example), in the morning when too much sun comes in at a low angle, people draw the shades and turn on desk lamps in addition to the overhead lighting.



      Personally, I think the clocks should stay constant

      Agreed. If businesses can save a penny by changing when the workdway begins and ends, they most certainly will, without the need for our Nanny-in-DC to shove the idea down our throats.

    5. Re:DST is artifical anyway by winwar · · Score: 1

      "But earlier in the morning I can't enjoy it- I'm at work. By placing it at the end of the day, I can still have some time out in the sunlight after work ends."

      You make one very large and incorrect assumption-that everyone works the same hours during the daylight. They don't. Other people might enjoy the daylight in the morning.

      And I think people survived just fine without DST....

    6. Re:DST is artifical anyway by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      The *vast* majority of people work 8-6 pm. Working other hours is the exception, not the rule.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
  29. Canada? Mexico? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What happens to Canada and Mexico? Surely they will have to follow if this is to be effective.

    1. Re:Canada? Mexico? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:Canada? Mexico? by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      "What happens to Canada and Mexico? Surely they will have to follow if this is to be effective."

      Canada and Mexico both use the Metric System while we do not (with the exception of the scientific community - not counting that one NASA blunder - and the military due to NATO standardization). So, with that in mind, why would Canada and Mexico also have to adopt the time change?

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
  30. 2 things by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 1

    Why do we need DST any more? and This is yet another reason to build applications to run off of GMT/UTC.

  31. y2.005k consultant for hire by Jodka · · Score: 1

    After missing out on the money fest the last time around, I'd be a fool not to market myself as a y2.005k consultant this time around.

    You might say there is nothing to really worry about here, but all the more reason to sell yourself to clients. If there is no real threat, there is no danger that you will fail.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature.
  32. What about embeded? by ResQuad · · Score: 1

    Yea - Computers getting the change is going to suck - but thats a very easy fix. By that I mean its going to require a patch - but patching is common place so thats nothing new.

    What about embeded devices? I have a clock on my wall that automatically adjusts for DST - but if they change when thats going to happen I have to turn off this "feature" and manually adjust my clock. Granted one little clock isnt a big deal - but this is just a small example. Think about all the small devices you have around that tracks time & date (home entertainment?). Most of these items _cant_ be patched.

    Dont get me wrong - I think this is a fine idea (screw the children - its population control) - but they need to decide about it now for maybe next year. That way the consumer electonics area has time to sell us new devices with updated clocks (and I'm sure the retail industry will love that).

    1. Re:What about embeded? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Help the economy, buy a new one.

    2. Re:What about embeded? by JayBat · · Score: 1
      I have a clock on my wall clock that automatically adjusts for DST - but if they change when thats going to happen I have to turn off this "feature" and manually adjust my clock.

      You sure? You might have something different, but every wall clock I've ever seen that does auto-daylight-time switching is a NIST shortwave receiver clock. You know, like this.

      Daylight time switchover is coded in the WWVB signal. Everything will work perfectly, just like it was designed. Don't worry, be happy.

      -Jay-

  33. WAHOOO!!!! by QuasiEvil · · Score: 1, Funny

    Yeah, here goes my karma. Oh well.

    WAAAAHHOOOOO!!!! I'm not a morning person, so I don't give a crap if it gets light earlier. I'd rather have more light after work, when I'm actually awake and productive...

    Non-morning people unite and rejoice!

    1. Re:WAHOOO!!!! by runner_one · · Score: 1

      Me Too, I Love DST Gives me more time in the evening
      I can't wait. In fact I wish we were on Double Daylight Saving Time Year round.
      I'm never up before 8:00 anyway.

  34. OSS vs. Proprietary by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I'd be interested to see how quickly and how well this change gets incorporated in open source vs. closed source software.

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    1. Re:OSS vs. Proprietary by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      " I'd be interested to see how quickly and how well this change gets incorporated in open source vs. closed source software."

      What I'm interested in seeing is 1) the date Microsoft announces that this will join the ever-expanding list of new and innovative functionality in Longhorn; and 2) the date they announce that this "won't be ready for Longhorn, but will still be under development for inclusion in future Microsoft products."

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:OSS vs. Proprietary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a fucking troll, Robbert.

  35. stop fooling with the clocks by wkk2 · · Score: 1

    I wish they would just make DST year round since it doesn't seem to be possible to get rid of DST. Indiana just passed DST. Now I need to move to AZ or HI...

    1. Re:stop fooling with the clocks by xferboy · · Score: 1

      or move north of the 49th to SK... never mind, twice a year there is grumblings about someone wanting DST, and that will be the end of the referances to us in the date setup screens

  36. Don't they have a dick to pull... by Spencerian · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...other than mine, without permission?!

    This is yet one other sign that we need to shoot lobbyists that approach D.C. as if they were a direct Al Queda attack. This is a crackpot idea that not only screws with all the time-sensitive software (right down to our operating systems and their time zone support) but also fucks with the world agreement on such use of DST.

    I'm in Indiana, where we have just approved the use of DST for the majority of the state that never observed it (Arizona and Hawaii are similar holdouts). And NOW some politico-corporate lackey wants to change things just for business...never mind that you aren't saving a damn bit of daylight in November, unless their laws affect the Earth's tilt and orbital position to give us more sun than we're to have at that time.

    There's no reason for this...and the cost for changing everything will make the costs of Y2K seem like a pittance. Problem is, I don't know who would profit from it. Once I do find out, I hope they're shot. A lot.

    --
    Vos teneo officium eram periculosus ut vos recipero is.
    1. Re:Don't they have a dick to pull... by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And NOW some politico-corporate lackey wants to change things just for business

      Seeing as how DST was implemented FOR business to begin with, so what?

      There's no reason for this...and the cost for changing everything will make the costs of Y2K seem like a pittance.

      Nonsense.

      Y2K included all kinds of subtle problems in code. DST is primarily implemented in the OS's time-keeping functions. For systems where the application does the DST calculations, it is going to generally be a well-defined area that can be reasonably easily modified without much worry about surprising side-effects.

    2. Re:Don't they have a dick to pull... by greenreaper · · Score: 1

      What the heck do you mean "world agreement"? Having just written an update to a certain piece of software to give it the ability to use the 30 major time zone rules I could find around the world (not to mention the hundreds of time zones themselves, going up to GMT+14, many of them fractional and/or nonsensical), I assure you that there is no such thing. ;-)

      And yes, the Indiana ruling was a tad annoying, too, given that I'd just figured out the correct rules for each region, based on longitude. At least there's some lead-time for that.

      Also, the Native American population in Arizona does in fact observe it. Crazy stuff.

      Nothing above should be construed as saying that DST is a bad thing. I appreciate its benefits, as does (fortunately) the US government.

    3. Re:Don't they have a dick to pull... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      never mind that you aren't saving a damn bit of daylight in November, unless their laws affect the Earth's tilt

      You have to be an idiot to think that DST actually changes the ammount of daylight. All it does is make sure people are awake earlier in the summer when the sun is up earlier, and make sure people get up later in the winter when the sun is up later.

      There's no reason for this...

      Well that's just blatantly untrue. You may not agree with the reasoning for it. You may not like the hassle of it. However, you can't possibly deny there is a reason for it.

      I don't know who would profit from it. Once I do find out, I hope they're shot. A lot.

      You are the one who profits from it. If the sun is up when you're driving to/from work, and if you get home earlier in the winter, you will be using significantly less oil/electricity for lighting, heating, etc.

      Now then, I'll just be standing here for a while, waiting to see you to shoot yourself. A lot.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  37. Practicality of DST by AutopsyReport · · Score: 1

    For those (like me) who couldn't figure how DST results in significant energy savings, this Wikipedia explanation should answer your questions.

    --

    For he today that sheds his blood with me shall be my brother.

  38. Daylight Saving Time is a Joke... literally by dsands1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Surprisingly enough, daylight-saving time was thought up by Benjamin Franklin, not drunken voters. According to http://webexhibits.org/daylightsaving/, it seems that one day Benjy got bored and wrote a little something called An Economical Project. It was an essay mostly about "himself, his love of thrift, his scientific papers and his passion for playing chess until the wee hours of the morning then sleeping until midday," and it was meant to be a joke.

    However, an Englishman named William Willett (how can you take someone with that name seriously? Come on!) was apparently too dense to realize that Franklin was joking. Therefore, he thought it would be a novel idea to set clocks back for 20 minutes on each Sunday in April, and then turn them back on the Sundays in September. Eventually, daylight-saving time came to be as we now know it."

    Taken from here

    --
    "What is the answer?" (Silence) "In that case, what is the question?" --Gertrude Stein
    1. Re:Daylight Saving Time is a Joke... literally by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      and his passion for playing chess until the wee hours of the morning then sleeping until midday

      With the knowledge that electronic games weren't available back then (though of course Ben had a hand in the long history leading up to them!) I'll say that this is probably the only way in which I'm substantially similar to Ben Franklin.

      Oh, and his love of beer. We have that in common too.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    2. Re:Daylight Saving Time is a Joke... literally by glass_window · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, but notice that attempt was struck down. It wasn't until WWI that they actually enacted it, and that was only for one whole year. This happened again for WWII, all just to conserve energy. Finally in 1966 it was pulled together by the Uniform Time Act because there was no reasoning behind who was observing it and who wasn't, each locality decided for itself whether or not it would observe DST. After that act passed, everybody had to observe it. Basically it wasn't a serious thing until 1966.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daylight_savings_time #History

    3. Re:Daylight Saving Time is a Joke... literally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about a gravity-saving time? We set our scales back ten pounds for the summer and avoid all that unpleasnat dieting and exercise.

  39. This could be a Hallmark event by nizo · · Score: 5, Funny

    This isn't a problem; simply get Hallmark to create yet another holiday. Something catchy like, "Don't burn your house down" day to help people remember to change their batteries (maybe even with a pocket to hold replacement batteries).

    1. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by robertjw · · Score: 4, Funny

      Something catchy like, "Don't burn your house down" day to help people remember to change their batteries

      Good idea, except we will need two holidays, one for spring and one for fall. We should name them something similar so people will never remember which is which (like memorial day and labor day). Maybe "Don't burn your house down" day in the spring and "Save your life" day in the fall.

    2. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by tekiegreg · · Score: 1

      Well, if people are used to setting clocks with the daylight savings time change, fine we only really need one holiday then.

      For example, we'll be putting the new DST change in March, so count off 6 months to september and create a new "don't burn the house down" holiday! Heck make it Labor day instead (It's labor day so get off your butt and labor to check your smoke alarm batteries). Problem solved...

      --
      ...in bed
    3. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      like memorial day and labor day

      You have a problem differentiating a day to remember the dead from a day to 'celebrate' workers? memorial day is always in the spring, labor day always in the fall, it's really easy to rember especially if you play to many resident evil type games.. the dead 'sring' back to life and workers all 'fall' down after a hard day's labor.

    4. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by empaler · · Score: 3, Informative

      In the rest of the world, Labor day is May 1st.

    5. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by Martin+Blank · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's a Commie holiday. We don't support Commie holidays here in the US.

      Commie.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    6. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by jZnat · · Score: 1

      Or like Valentine's Day and Sweetest's Day.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    7. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by PygmySurfer · · Score: 2, Informative

      In the rest of the world, Labor day is May 1st.

      Lies! here in Canada, its in September as well.

    8. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by KylePflug · · Score: 3, Funny

      I have an even better idea. We'll call it "Every six months day". It will happen every six months. You'll know when it's that day again because that's the day you change your fire alarm batteries.

    9. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by mabinogi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In Australia it's March 7, March 14, May 2, or October 3, depending on which state you're in.

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    10. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the rest of the world, Labor day is May 1st.

      In New Zealand it's the 4th Monday in October, and it's spelt Labour Day.

    11. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by robertjw · · Score: 0

      That's a good one. Maybe we could just use the summer and winter solstices - incorporate some ancient druid festival as a battery changing ceremony.

    12. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by andreMA · · Score: 1

      New Years Day and July 4th. Close enough.

    13. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by EggyToast · · Score: 2

      Not to mention that both holidays usually involve some sort of fireworks. Timely AND applicable!

    14. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by doppe1 · · Score: 1
      New Years Day

      Yeah right, lol, like anyone wants to hear a loud alarm on New Years Day.

    15. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by devnull_2 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      That's something a terrarist would say. We lock up terrarists indefinitely without trials here in the US.

      Terrarist.

    16. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by ginotech · · Score: 1

      We also speak english here in the US. You must be a terrorist.

    17. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by nyekulturniy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ironically, May 1 commemorates the Haymarket labor deaths in Chicago.

      --
      Nyekulturniy... Proudly confusing readers and editors since 1981!
    18. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 0
      ...Maybe we could just use the summer and winter solstices - incorporate some ancient druid festival as a battery changing ceremony

      Mana Battery Day! Wouldn't work for pure tanks though...

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    19. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you think that we speak English in the USA, then you obviously have not been here (nor did you capitalize the English). We speak something, but these days, I do not think it is English. Just listen to GWB.

      YOU must be the terrorist leader( or if you are older, then you are a commie pinko ).

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    20. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "nor did you capitalize the English"

      Yo capitalize the english yo. axe me dat holmes.

      You should focus less on other people's english whenever yours is based off of a thesaurus. This is the internet, perfect grammer isn't expected, American English and British English has been in kde for years as well. Aight, y'all have fun now.

    21. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by The+Snowman · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's a Commie holiday. We don't support Commie holidays here in the US.

      No, we "celebrate" Labor Day by forcing our blue collar workers to their jobs to run the retail stores while everyone else enjoys sales, promotions, and extended shopping hours.

      Celebrate Labor Day by working! Amazing!

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
    22. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by aidfarh · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, I've always felt the other way around. I find it ironic that we celebrate Labour Day by having a holiday. I mean, fathers don't celebrate Fathers Day by stopping being fathers, mothers don't celebrate Mothers Day by stopping being mothers, nurses don't celebrate Nurses Day by stopping being nurses, etc., so why are labourers celebrating Labour Day by not doing any labour? In fact, we should celebrate Labour Day by doing more labour, to really celebrate the concept of labouring.

      --
      There is no sig.
    23. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by MemoryAid · · Score: 2, Funny
      Congress would better serve us by providing incentives to battery manufacturers to create batteries that could reliably detect smoke for a whole year.

      Why do we need daylight saving time at all? Because congress is already in bed with those same battery manufacturers, who want us to buy twice as many batteries as we really need. Follow the money... but you already know where it leads, don't you.

      --
      Language students: Don't try to learn English here. This ain't it.
    24. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by surprise_audit · · Score: 1

      Doesn't have to be spring and fall. How about New Year and July 4th?? Near enough 6 months apart, and nobody will forget *those* dates easily...

    25. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by litecode · · Score: 1

      That's a Commie holiday. We don't support Commie holidays here in the US.

      No, we "celebrate" Labor Day by forcing our blue collar workers to their jobs to run the retail stores while everyone else enjoys sales, promotions, and extended shopping hours.

      Celebrate Labor Day by working! Amazing!


      Yeah, exactly.. this is America, say one thing, do another.

    26. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by The+Tyrant · · Score: 1

      Anyone who gets woken up on new years day, even by a loud piercing alarm, has clearly not had enough to drink.

    27. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by empaler · · Score: 1

      *swoosh*

      That was the joke flying over your head...

    28. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by empaler · · Score: 1

      Well, of course you'd have the same Labor Day as America in America Jr.

    29. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by isorox · · Score: 1

      s/commie/terrorists/g

      Get in the 21st century!

    30. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      ... but people will be too wasted...

    31. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by lurch_ss · · Score: 1

      Well, of course you'd have the same Labor Day as America in America Jr.

      Take off, eh. We ain't like those hosers, you nob.

    32. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      Thats what my Dad would always say when I was growing up - it's Labor day, the time of the year to drop what you are doing and get some actual work done (fixing the house, etc.)

    33. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Good enough to sig... :-)

    34. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by xappax · · Score: 2, Informative

      Labor day is not exactly intended to celebrate labor, as in "the act of laboring", but rather the Labor Movement, as in unions and the struggle for fair wages and working conditions.
      As much as some folks resent unions today, they did play an integral role in the worker's rights we now enjoy, and so we made a holiday about it - sort of like MLK.

      It is interesting, however, that the US moved away from May 1st, or "May day", the labor holiday in most of Europe. Many people suspect this was because of the more radical union politics associated with "May Day" i.e. riots, strikes, the IWW etc.

    35. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's labor day in the US cuz them peoplez can't speel.

    36. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not invent two batteries. One that lasts 8 months and one that lasts 4 months. Just think of the marketing potential.

    37. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what the fuck is "terrar"?

    38. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not May 1st in Canada either. I believe the first monday in September here.

      I'd love to do a poll and see how many people actually follow the change your batteries with daylight savings. Heck, I don't think I've changed my batteries in 2 years. I test, but not change. I don't think 2 months is going to make a big difference. With the batteries of today, they should last for years and years before going out.

    39. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by The+Tyrant · · Score: 1

      Aww, thank you *bows*

      Last time someone .sig'd me it was me saying "So, say I was an octopus..." (I never got any further than that, it was going to be a deep insight into the mindset of octopi, but it got derailed by fits of giggles)

    40. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by ginotech · · Score: 1

      No one in the US capitalizes english. You must be canadian.

    41. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by whatteaux · · Score: 1

      And here in Oz, it's in October. "Rest of the world" indeed. Piffle!

    42. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by JLF65 · · Score: 1

      No, all those words where we change them from "our" to "or" are ALL of French origin. Look in your dictionary. Here in the states, we hate them damn Frenchies, so we changed all their words so they were AMERCIAN instead of French. :)

    43. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by Math,+The+Ancient · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's the blue collars that get the day off (steel workers, journeyman, manufacturers, etc). Retail workers are actually considered "white" collars because they provide a service.

      --
      If I really am talking out of my ass...explain it to me with respect so I'll at least pull my ears out to listen.
    44. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what the fuck is "terrar"?

      A poor fucking example of trying to imitate a Texan accent.

    45. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by EternityInterface · · Score: 1

      Terran with an n badly OCR'd > terra > earth > caring about earth > environmentalists > tree-huggers > worship of trees > does not pray to the lord > I think those were filed as terrorists sir.

      --
      the sun is god
    46. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by mat+catastrophe · · Score: 1

      Fireworks and alcohol, which is why you need the smoke detector in the first place. Natch.

      --
      sig not found
    47. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

      I have a better idea: I call it Darwinism. If you're so fucking stupid that you need a National Holiday to remember to change your Fire Alarm battery, you deserve to die in a fire.

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    48. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by shawb · · Score: 1

      Replace the batteries right before midnight New Year's Eve. Everyone then tests as the clock hits midnight. Wow... that somehow seems... wrong.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    49. Re:This could be a Hallmark event by shawb · · Score: 1

      Labor day is actually in celebration of a victory of the unions over corporations, so it actually does make sense that you celebrate by not working.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
  40. Sign me up! by KingSkippus · · Score: 1

    I've been screaming for years and I'll say it again: Daylight Saving Time is a stupid concept that should be done away with as soon as possible.

    I hope whoever came up with the idea of pretending that it's an hour earlier than it really is is burning in hell right now, along with those who codified this weird lunacy into law.

    I could give you a thousand reasons why it should be eliminated, but here's the most important one to me. Noon has historically been the time, more or less, when the sun is high in the sky. Daylight Savings Time completely does away with that rationale. Now, noon is only defined by what we personally find convenient.

    (sigh.)

    1. Re:Sign me up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The trick is, no one reads your blog.

      Because they don't care.

    2. Re:Sign me up! by KingSkippus · · Score: 1

      Oops, I linked to the wrong comment post above, I didn't write that one. I did, however, write one of the replies.

    3. Re:Sign me up! by KingSkippus · · Score: 1
      The trick is, no one reads your blog.
      Because they don't care.

      The real trick is, your opinions ought to hurt my feelings but they don't.

      Because I don't care.

      What are you, six years old? Can't you find any kids to pick on at recess instead, or are you afraid they'll tell your mommy?

      (bigger sigh with eyes rolling.)

    4. Re:Sign me up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what I enjoy? Pompus assbags like you who think you are important enough to contribute something to society through the written word and then sit here when someone disrupts your feeble attempts at being intellectual.

      Culturalist Neil Postman (now dead) has alot of interesting things to say about modern technologies that allow the common person to say anything cheapening the quality of the written word. I associate cheapness with people like you. I know you'll probably reply with some predictable sychophantic diatraibe about maturity and proper behavior.. so I don't really care what you think becuase its meaningless.

      By the way, I didn't pick you explicitly. I harvested all the blogspot blogs off of Slashdot and unleashed my crapflooder against them.

      Lets just say my troll was successful. You wasted energy replying to it and failed at properly analyzing it. You were totally wrong in what the troll was all about.

    5. Re:Sign me up! by KingSkippus · · Score: 1

      No, I won't lecture you on maturity an proper behavior, it would be a waste of time. In fact, maybe you are right about how allowing the common person to say anything cheapens the quality of the written word, Mr. Anonymous Coward.

      Oh by the way, thanks for giving me a topic for my latest blog entry, and I'm glad you enjoy the blog! The way you keep writing to me about it, I can tell that you really do care. I'm really sorry, but I did have to cut off your ability to "crapflood" it, though, since a bunch of other people also read it. I'm not really sure how effective your crapflood was, though, since the five minutes or so it took me to remove the posts haven't yet convinced me to stop writing. I guess you'll have to waste some more of your own energy and try to figure out some other way to vandalize it. Good luck with that, I'll keep an eye on it to see what you come up with.

      Now I've really got to go. I'm sure that the nice folks on Slashdot don't want to read any more diatribes and there are a lot more people I have to scream about Daylight Saving Time about. I'll be happy to continue the discussion with you if you post your e-mail address. And just so you look a little less silly to your next troll target, "sycophant" is spelled "syco-," not "sycho-." Later...

    6. Re:Sign me up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't get it. I don't give a shit about your worthless blog or your intellectually tepid entries. I indiscriminatly crapflooded blogs I found on Slashdot and you replied as if it was some sort of intellectual battle for you to take part in. Again, you predictably replied as I stated, despite your explicit attempt not to. It makes no difference to me if you play the role of victim or valiant crusader against trolls. You're too self-indulged to even have a moderate sense of self-perspective here, so my point is to only demonstrate what a fool you are to everyone else.

      I know your self-esteem is directly tied to how people percieve what you say in your blog, so you use it as an oppritunity to make yourself appear smart and appeal to the values of the group in order to fit in.

      And so that you don't appear as a hypocrite, you may want to fix the spelling on your latest blog entry. I won't do it for you, I'm sure your two brain cells are at least capable of loading your text into a spell checker and pointing out your error. I don't really care about spelling, but you threw the first stone, so eat shit.

    7. Re:Sign me up! by mujahaddin · · Score: 1

      We can tell how little you care by the fact that you felt you had to "crapflood", and continue to defend your infantile behavior. Though, you probably predicted I would say that...

    8. Re:Sign me up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Infants crapflood blogs?

      I don't care about his blog per se, I care about the responses (be it posted to the blog or whatever). They make wonderful entertainment. I disturbed someone's self-aggrandizing soapbox and all hell broke loose. Its like letting a fart off in a crowded room!

      Death to crowdismm and groupthink.

  41. The lawn chair lobby has way too much power. by rjreb · · Score: 1

    Is no one in Washington willing to stick up for the little guy?

    --
    Pork is not a verb
  42. No big deal in *nix by TommydCat · · Score: 4, Interesting
    While doing work for some telecom companies down in Brazil I ran into this because evidently (depending on province) they pass a resolution each year determining when to start DST and when to come off, usually planning around holidays and the whims of people in those positions. They have suggested dates, but they sometimes vary from year to year.

    For most *nix systems, look in /usr/share/lib/zoneinfo for zone definition files. If you're lucky (or have Solaris), there's a src directory in there.

    You'll find a README file with a reference to a place with updated zone files.

    On the other hand you could try to roll your own like I did for Belo Horizonte and edit the rules in one of the source files (I would think "northamerica" for the US ;)

    Do a man zic for more info on compiling and then distributing to other systems.

    --
    This comment does not necessarily represent the views and opinions of the author.
    1. Re:No big deal in *nix by Guy+Harris · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mod parent up "+5 Clueful". Yes, many UN*Xes use either the "Arthur Olson" time zone code or something compatible; this includes, at minimum, Solaris, OS X, most if not all Linux distributions, and all the free-software BSDs. For those systems, the time zone files would be updated, and anything using the OS calls for converting times, or otherwise using the time zone files, will Just Work.

    2. Re:No big deal in *nix by Kiz2 · · Score: 1

      I'm working on a story about the potential change for IDG News -- the Brazil case sounds interesting. I'd like to connect with people who have dealt with a similar change before. if you (or anyone else with similar experience) see this and don't mind chatting, I'm at stacy_cowley@idg.com. thanks!

    3. Re:No big deal in *nix by TommydCat · · Score: 1
      There's no real story here... Many other countries have "fuzzier" rules concerning time zones, DST, etc. Unix-based applications that utilize these libraries which are based on customizable rules have had no issue "over there", so there's no reason to expect a problem "over here".

      In the MS world, so what if the system time is off by an hour two months out of the year? Maybe a sprinkler system will surprise some kids on the way to school?

      On the other hand, it'd be interesting to see what happens with the CDMA cellular networks (Verizon, Sprint) since their system timing is derived via GPS and therefore all the software has to match concepts of time. Some of their vendors have issues with this in the past, but all that I've been aware of were solved within hours.

      --
      This comment does not necessarily represent the views and opinions of the author.
  43. Oh great... by VMaN · · Score: 1

    So now with the US pushing for dominance in space exploration Bush will be in control of space AND TIME ???

  44. Linux will be updated faster. by ThinkingInBinary · · Score: 1

    Probably within a week there will be updates to the timezone definition files (/usr/share/zoneinfo/...). Not a big deal for Linux users. But Windows users will probably have to wait for the next semi-millennial patch cycle.

    1. Re:Linux will be updated faster. by a42 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, the Windows patch should be very small and easy to implement. Time Zone definitions are stored in the registry. Part of that data says when the DST changeover happens.

    2. Re:Linux will be updated faster. by ThinkingInBinary · · Score: 1

      Oh, I wasn't suggesting it would be hard to implement, but that it would get swallowed up in Microsoft's patch process.

      Slightly offtopic, but it's a real PITA when running Windows Update on a very out-of-date computer to have to install .Net 1.0, then upgrade to .Net 1.1, then download a security patch. Can't *Microsoft* slipstream their *own* patches for even *one* component?

  45. The Reason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lobbying from big companies. Procter and Gamble, the owner of brands like Downey fabric softner lobbied hard to get DST extended.

    Why? Because P&G also owns charcoal and outdoor grilling brands, and extended DST is good for grilling.

    I think this kind of lobbying is retarded, and this shows that nothing is outside the reach of corporations in our government.

  46. This is good... by tricaric · · Score: 1

    ...for next April fool's day.

  47. Kill it! by prides_folly · · Score: 1

    For as long as I can remember, people have been forgetting to set their clocks forward and back. It would be pretty funny if DST could be abolished that those people who had their act together would start messing up. Microsoft might be forced to patch Win95.. hehe hmmm.. maybe it's part of their grand plan to get people to upgrade.

  48. It won't be THAT bad for a lot of software. by tgd · · Score: 1

    The libraries that are used to convert times will need vendor patches. If people were doing it themselves, they deserve to have it broken since the rules around where it happens, and when during the year varies around the world.

    Most standard libraries doing timezone conversions already need to know the date since daylight savings time needs to be calculated. Those will just need another rule for the US (pre 2006 and post 2006).

    This isn't Y2K. Its a total non-issue to the end users and developers of most software.

  49. Shouldn't most time critical IT applications ... by roubles · · Score: 1

    ... be using some kind of synchronization protocol like NTP http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1305.html ? All you have to do is update the server, and the clients will follow pick up the changes.

    This is no where as complex as the y2k problem.

  50. move to arizona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the computers will have to move to arizona where there is no DST. And I thought there we lots of people heading here now.

  51. Pedantry by ari_j · · Score: 1

    It's Daylight Saving Time. Not "Savings." See Wikipedia for an explanation.

    1. Re:Pedantry by nsayer · · Score: 1
      Speaking of pedantry, how much harder would it have been to make it a real link?

    2. Re:Pedantry by ari_j · · Score: 1

      I tried to link it. I must have typoed the closing tag or something and got caught by the Slashfilter. Thanks for the follow-up.

  52. It will be fixed just like any other problem... by MindNumbingOblivion · · Score: 1
    ...with a patch.

    Then again, maybe it isn't that simple. I'll be the first to admit that I've never worked an enterprise project that required updating for DST, so maybe I'm missing something.

    I'd figure it would be based on a calendar function, so it shouldn't be that hard to tell your program to adjust at a different time. What I'd be more worried about is projects that aren't US based not updating for new support of the US DST.

    This is why I keep a lot of my applications set to Zulu time and just do conversions. I like doing away with cultural timing practices with regards to technology. My calendar on my blog expresses dates in yyyy.ddd format and only shows time in 24hr cdt because most of my readership is in Alabama. Although the case is definitely there for my still using cultural conventions in my timekeeping practices. Oh well, it's more understandable to most people than seconds since the Unix epoch :-)

    --
    #define CLUE 0
  53. Legacy by APE992 · · Score: 1

    Makes us Legacy users get screwed. Not like DOS ever really had a time function, but it's nice being able to keep track of things. Win95 and 98 can probably just be patched, assuming MS kept the source around. And so help me if they don't.

  54. Congressional morons! by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    When asked how to conserve energy, they passed by increasing the gas taxes, passed by making the CAFE standards apply to all vehicles including SUVs, passed by investing in alternative energy sources, and instead said "I know, let's make Daylight Saving Time apply a few more months out of the year!". I've got a better idea -- instead of fucking with the damn clock, why not encourage employers to let employees work flexible hours, or even change their work schedules in the summer months? That does it, I'm going to use GMT exclusively from now on! It's 20:43 GMT, dammit!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:Congressional morons! by DaveJay · · Score: 1

      >instead of fucking with the damn clock, why not encourage employers to let employees work flexible hours, or even change their work schedules in the summer months?

      Indeed. I set my own hours at my current job, and find myself waking up with the sun now -- which ironically makes me wake up earlier than I used to with an alarm. So I end up going to work the same time I used to during the winter, and earlier than I used to during the summer. Hurray for circadian rhythms!

  55. Oh yeah, this will save energy by lorcha · · Score: 1

    Now, instead of running my lights in the afternoon, I can run my central air conditioner, which uses much less energy than a fricking light bulb.
    </sarcasm>

    --
    "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
  56. I'm not pleased. by mind21_98 · · Score: 1

    So we're going to save 100,000 barrels of oil a day, or ~0.5% of the US daily oil consumption. Considering that 75-90% (depending on source) of our oil use is from transportation, wouldn't it make more sense to mandate a national speed limit or minimum MPG ratings for *all* cars and SUVs? Or at least some other change that would have more of an effect? Quite frankly I'm not pleased with Congress' handling of the issue.

    Keeping on topic though, it shouldn't be too hard to keep track. Modern versions of Windows have NTP built in, so the time should remain correct regardless of what the current status of DST is. On Unix/Linux we can edit the timezone files. *shrug*

  57. An Update Perhaps by WAR-Ink · · Score: 1

    Perhaps some sort of sortware update would be in order.

    Maybe if we had some kind of global network that manufacturers could send updates directly to end users, it would even speed things up. Arizona might be a problem though. They currently maintain their own timezone.

    I could certainly see where changing a 10 to an 11 in Windows code could bring about the downfall of western civilization.

    I personally think the whole DST is crap. Who cares if it is light or dark out? I go home in the dark every day. Sun doesn't get it my eyes while I drive. It's nice. This is just another example of tunnel vision in government. "Let's save 100,000 barrels of oil a day by changing what time it is." The side effect being chaos in the streets as Windows blue screens. The alternative being not using oil any more and waving goodbye to the Alaska pipeline. Of course why would Chevron and Exxon want to start producing hydrogen when they have drilling for oil down to a science.

  58. Original Ben Franklin Essay on DST by dsginter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Daylight Saving

    I always post this when the topic comes up. I'm a fan of Franklin and really enjoy reading this.

    --
    More
    1. Re:Original Ben Franklin Essay on DST by __aakqkc2748 · · Score: 1

      I believe those lines were written by a Canadian trio called RUSH and appeared on an album called "A farewell to kings". Great lines though. Kurt

    2. Re:Original Ben Franklin Essay on DST by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have always hated the switch- They said it was for farmers, but that is ridicerous. (Farmers get up when the cows need to be milked- it doesn't matter what a chronometer says.)
      My solution? "Fall Back" a half hour one year, and just leave it there permanently. Right in the middle....

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    3. Re:Original Ben Franklin Essay on DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm... you really need to learn how to differentiate between a linky and a sig...

    4. Re:Original Ben Franklin Essay on DST by wombert · · Score: 1
      Wow, the site seems to have have taken Franklin seriously. If the government implemented DST because of Franklin's ideas and recommendation, why did they leave out these gems?
      First. Let a tax be laid of a louis per window, on every window that is provided with shutters to keep out the light of the sun.

      Second. Let the same salutary operation of police be made use of, to prevent our burning candles, that inclined us last winter to be more economical in burning wood; that is, let guards be placed in the shops of the wax and tallow chandlers, and no family be permitted to be supplied with more than one pound of candles per week.

      Third. Let guards also be posted to stop all the coaches, &c. that would pass the streets after sunset, except those of physicians, surgeons, and midwives.

      Fourth. Every morning, as soon as the sun rises, let all the bells in every church be set ringing; and if that is not sufficient?, let cannon be fired in every street, to wake the sluggards effectually, and make them open their eyes to see their true interest.
      Franklin was basically saying, "These people need to get off their asses and follow my 'Early to bed, early to rise' philosophy." People who use the essay as a defense for DST are missing the point.
      --
      Did I say overlords? I meant protectors.
    5. Re:Original Ben Franklin Essay on DST by ILikeRed · · Score: 1

      I like everything else I have read from Franklin, and in actuality, I think this may have all been tongue-in-cheek, but that most politicians are to dense to see it as such. I think it is just about as serious as his "Conversation with the Gout", which has not caused me to play less chess. I hate Daylight Savings, it's the one thing I miss about Indiana. Your all sheep I say!

      So, do you seriously feel you fully have Franklin's support on this issue??? Teaching swimming, yes; this I'm not so sure of. If only Franklin had clearly marked his sarcasm as such.

      I do like the other poster's suggestion of 1/2 an hour, although Newfoundland actually is in a time zone like that, so watch those bits of sarcasm.

      Go Boilermakers!

      --
      I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm, and three or more is a congress -J Adams
    6. Re:Original Ben Franklin Essay on DST by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 1

      Ben originally posted this to sci.energy.candle and was subsequently labeled a "kook."

    7. Re:Original Ben Franklin Essay on DST by toddestan · · Score: 1

      People who use the essay as a defense for DST are missing the point.

      The original poster said nothing about using that essay as a defense for DST. He just said it was an enjoyable read, which I have to agree with.

    8. Re:Original Ben Franklin Essay on DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err, actually we'd just leave the time the hell alone once we went back to standard time. Putting it in the middle would be screwy.

      Here in Arizona, we don't have to worry about any of this crap. And I *love* it. I haven't changed a clock in years. DST is an idiotic, outdate convention that should have been abolished ages ago.

      If people really want to enjoy more sun, they can get up an hour earlier instead of changing their clocks to trick themselves into doing that.

    9. Re:Original Ben Franklin Essay on DST by evilviper · · Score: 1
      They said it was for farmers, but that is ridicerous.

      Who the hell is "They"? DST was never for farmers, nor did any intelligent person ever claim it was. Saying "They said" implies some authority figures used this as the rationale, which is patently ridiculous. I have no doubt the representatives who decided on DST understood the complex issue, and "farmers" never entered into it.

      My solution? "Fall Back" a half hour one year, and just leave it there permanently. Right in the middle....

      Proving conclusively that you have NO IDEA AT ALL what DST is for.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    10. Re:Original Ben Franklin Essay on DST by slashflood · · Score: 1


      They said it was for farmers, but that is ridicerous.

      Nope, it has been invented in the industrialization era to save energy costs for the enterprises. More than a hundred years ago it was very expensive to light up a production hall. Thats the reason, nothing else.

    11. Re:Original Ben Franklin Essay on DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I have always hated the switch- They said it was for farmers, but that is ridicerous. (Farmers get up when the cows need to be milked- it doesn't matter what a chronometer says.)
      My solution? "Fall Back" a half hour one year, and just leave it there permanently. Right in the middle....
      It would make more sense if the U.S. finally switched to the metric system.
    12. Re:Original Ben Franklin Essay on DST by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      I always figured that was a satire. I mean the guy's implicit argument is that we'll save on candle wax and other lighting effects by forcing everyone to get up earlier, because we're too lazy to do it ourselves.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    13. Re:Original Ben Franklin Essay on DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can imagine it now. 10 hour days, with the news still being one hour long (144 minutes our time).

      (Metric time, decimal time, same difference I say.)

    14. Re:Original Ben Franklin Essay on DST by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      10 hour days, with the news still being one hour long (144 minutes our time).

      ... and work time still 8 hours, but salary the same :-( The capitalists would love it!

    15. Re:Original Ben Franklin Essay on DST by taffeta · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough, there's at least one group of farmers who aren't so keen on it today. Looks like the Hoosiers keep arguing about adopting daylight savings time, but some "farmers fear their cows will come home at the wrong time." http://www.legalaffairs.org/issues/May-June-2005/s cene_sangor_mayjun05.msp Evidently, there are also some questions of political identity going along with adopting DST: "Others simply dislike Eastern time and all that it represents. 'We're in the Midwest, not in the Mideast,' said Gary Cook, a former state legislator who is now Plymouth's mayor. On the floor of the Indiana House recently when the measure was being debated, similar sentiments were aired: 'In my part of the state, they know we've got more in common with Evansville and Chicago, Illinois,' Representative Dave Crooks declared, 'than we do with Bangor, Maine; Boston, Massachusetts; and New York City.' His fellow legislators burst into cheers."

    16. Re:Original Ben Franklin Essay on DST by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 1

      Sorry to get you so riled up- I didn't mean to. I will clarify: They said it was for farmers, but that is ridicerous. Who the hell is "They"? DST was never for farmers, nor did any intelligent person ever claim it was. Saying "They said" implies some authority figures used this as the rationale, which is patently ridiculous. I have no doubt the representatives who decided on DST understood the complex issue, and "farmers" never entered into it. Actually my friend, much like today, misinformation has always been a part of politics. Those (they) who wanted daylight savings time to save electicity and spend more time on the golf course, spread disonformation that farmers wanted DST. Many people, when polled, still assume that DST was done for the Farmers. My solution? "Fall Back" a half hour one year, and just leave it there permanently. Right in the middle.... Proving conclusively that you have NO IDEA AT ALL what DST is for. Okay Matlock, calm down- How is anything proved conclusively? The only thing proved conclusively is that you are riled. Please don't kick a dog or anything. I suggested the half hour fallback in jest. The best solution, in my mind would be to use Zulu time. No, it will never happen, because no one wants to get all new clocks.

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    17. Re:Original Ben Franklin Essay on DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like, "Sir, you contract states eight hour work days. I don't care if the government changed us to a 10 hour day. If you don't work 8 hours still, I'll sue."

    18. Re:Original Ben Franklin Essay on DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apologies, but Indiana legislators are complete fucktards. What the hell does his statement mean, really? Oh, yeah...Indiana is so different. We are unique little snowflakes.

      hoosier for 26 years and hate DST. I hate local government more.

    19. Re:Original Ben Franklin Essay on DST by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Those (they) who wanted daylight savings time to save electicity and spend more time on the golf course, spread disonformation that farmers wanted DST.

      You make the claim someone was spreading disinformation, yet provide no evidence at all of any of this. You're probably just jumping to the wrong conclusions, and have no evidence to support your little tin-foil-hat theory.

      Many people, when polled, still assume that DST was done for the Farmers.

      "still" should not be in there. You assume this was hold-over from a time when everyone believed it, which really isn't true. The whole "DST is for farmers" thing is a very recent invention. They're called urban legends.

      You can make any insane claim and say "they" did it.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  59. Proof of power savings? by Sappharad · · Score: 1

    Is there any actual proof of the power savings that they claim this would bring? I'm sure someone can come up with a few examples of the opposite.

    1. Re:Proof of power savings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently not.

  60. Typical governmental BS by ottffssent · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What an idiotic idea!

    I understand the theory that by changing people's work habits relative to the solar day, we may be saving some energy. I think the reality of it is rather less impressive than the theory, and certainly doesn't justify the expense and hassle, but it's undoubtedly there.

    Too bad changing DST is the stupidest way to do it. As has been mentioned before, DST impacts way more than just work schedules. It's buried deep in various applications where it doesn't belong. It's hard-coded into embedded systems where it can't be changed. It's stuck on old software installations that will never see an upgrade. Changing DST is bad enough, but a half-assed mix of new-DST machines and old-DST machines is just a recipe for disaster.

    If the government really wants to save energy by changing work habits, there are enormously better ways to do it. Tax credits for corporations that stagger their workers' start times by a significant margin would save way more energy than this DST nonsense, and it wouldn't have the unpleasant ancillary effects that changing the definition of time of day would have. Unimaginably large (you can look for the true numbers as well as I) amounts of gasoline are wasted in rush-hour traffic across the nation. Tax credits for starting 1/3 of employees 2hr earlier than normal and 1/3 2hr later would motivate employers to do it, and reducing the time people spend idling their cars on the freeways, or worse, driving in stop-and-go traffic, would save tons of fuel.

    Tax credits (or some other incentive) makes people happy because the government's not forcing anyone to do anything they don't want to. It would have very few unintended consequences. And it would save many times more energy.

    The reasoning that leads to a change in DST is just tortured. The government wants people going to work at a different time. So rather than ask (bribe, punish/bribe, whatever) businesses to employ people at different hours, they change the meaning of 8am, and screw up the entire country. Where's the logic in that?!

    1. Re:Typical governmental BS by nyrk · · Score: 1

      This may be the first step in achieving that goal. Once there are multiple standards, and clocks always seem to be wrong. People will ask questions of "what time zone" and "which Daylight Savings, old or new?" These breakages will lead to everyone including the UTC times, so everyone will be sure. Then pretty soon, people will use primarily the UTC times, and I would love to see that become the norm. Once time zones are broken. Work start times will be a convention. I rather like the idea of starting work at 4:00 and leaving at 12:00. Then in the winter starting at 5:00 and leaving at 1:00. Who cares what numbers are on the clock when I wake up and when I get to work. We have a lot of social inertia with these arbitrary numbers, it would need something like this to break them in order for us to see how truely arbitrary they are.

    2. Re:Typical governmental BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ottffssent for gov'nor!

    3. Re:Typical governmental BS by ad0gg · · Score: 1

      Your arguement would make sense if all the states followed DST but they don't, Hawaii and Alaska are on standard time.

      --

      Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

    4. Re:Typical governmental BS by hyfe · · Score: 1
      Tax credits and other incentives are also a major reason you end up with a bureaucrazy beyond measure. Those regulations, while well-meant, all add up. More paper pushers have to be hired in order to keep up, and business' good at gaming the system will gain even more advantages.

      The road to hell is paved with good intentions.

      --
      "" How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the stupidity-problem solve itself? """
    5. Re:Typical governmental BS by psst · · Score: 1
      If the government really wants to save energy by changing work habits, there are enormously better ways to do it. Tax credits for corporations that stagger their workers' start times by a significant margin would save way more energy than this DST nonsense, and it wouldn't have the unpleasant ancillary effects that changing the definition of time of day would have. Unimaginably large (you can look for the true numbers as well as I) amounts of gasoline are wasted in rush-hour traffic across the nation. Tax credits for starting 1/3 of employees 2hr earlier than normal and 1/3 2hr later would motivate employers to do it, and reducing the time people spend idling their cars on the freeways, or worse, driving in stop-and-go traffic, would save tons of fuel.
      The main idea behind DST involves aligning the solar day with the average person's active hours to save energy consumed by residential electric lighting. Corporate incentives can't possibly affect as many homes as can appropriate legislation, which means they would save less electricity. That is not to say that your gasoline saving idea won't work =)
    6. Re:Typical governmental BS by ScoLgo · · Score: 1

      Nice post. Totally agree with you, except for...

      I don't believe this is a move to reduce energy consumption. It's more a move to stimulate the economy. Much like Y2K did in the '90s. If you work in the computer industry, think of it as job security.

      --
      "Michael, I did nothing. I did absolutely nothing - and it was everything that I thought it could be."
    7. Re:Typical governmental BS by the+Dragonweaver · · Score: 1

      It sounds good, except that in a lot of industries, your work schedule is dependent upon other people in other jobs being there so you can contact them.

      As an example, my husband works in retail distribution. He has to be there at a certain hour because the warehouse supervisors are there at a certain hour because the shipping companies start at a certain hour. No doubt the shipping companies start at a certain hour because the planes and trucks arrive at a certain hour and the mail centers open at certain hours, and furthermore they all have to deal with the banks being open at certain hours.

      It's the law of unintended consequences. No matter what change you make, things will happen that you didn't even think of.

      --
      Actually I am a lab rat in an elaborate plot to take over the world.
    8. Re:Typical governmental BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Changing DST is bad enough, but a half-assed mix of new-DST machines and old-DST machines is just a recipe for disaster.

      why yes! it will cause bank computers to start emptying bank accounts, water valves to open and flood basements, streetlights to cause fatal accidents, launch nuclear missles, destroy the planet and economy! oh MY!!!

      let me guess, you were one of those scumbags that ran around screaming that the sky was falling for Y2K .... yet nothing happened or was going to happen (we had a testbed of all our apps on a seperate network NOT PATCHED. nothing happened, we didnt even have interest calculated wrong on late billing in the T&B system, only error was obvious overcharges on accounts that were greater than 180 days wouldhave cause 6 hours of work for the accountants... far less than the $95,000.00 they spent on "specalists" that really did nothing.

      This will cause NO problems, just a few people will be whiney when the clock on their cablebox will read wrong for a month.

    9. Re:Typical governmental BS by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Simply have schools start an hour earlier or whatever. If you start work at 6AM, chances are you're going to get to bed earlier. You don't need to call 6AM 7AM to have this effect.

    10. Re:Typical governmental BS by Rich0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Honestly, the impact of Y2K depends on your industry.

      If you're a 3-employee company and you spent $95k on Y2K, your boss was foolish.

      On the other hand, if you're fortune 500 and you have the same accounting glitch, you're talking more than 6 hours of work to fix it.

      If you're able to fix widespread accounting problems easily, then you're not super-dependant on your computers. So, it isn't worth spending extra to make sure they work.

      Part of why nothing happened on Y2K was the fact that people actually took it seriously and tested their code. If you remediate your code and test switching your servers to Jan 2nd, 2000 and it works, why should you be surprised when nothing happens on the dawn of Y2K?

      All the talk of wasted money on Y2K sounds like people complaining because they went on a careful diet to control their cholesterol and lived to the age of 85 and got hit by a car. They didn't ever have a heart attack - so the diet must have been a waste of effort, right?!

    11. Re:Typical governmental BS by winwar · · Score: 1

      "As an example, my husband works in retail distribution. He has to be there at a certain hour because the warehouse supervisors are there at a certain hour because the shipping companies start at a certain hour."

      Well, after working in distribution warehouses, I think you were correct up until the shipping companies part :) I suspect many warehouses do things because "that's the way we always have" and/or "the supervisors don't want to work at X hour" and/or "I dunno, it sounded good". I suspect very few do it for logical reasons. Very few places HAVE to be open the hours they are.

    12. Re:Typical governmental BS by d474 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Arizona. Right now we are in the same timezone as California. Then in the winter we are in the same timezone as Colorado.

      I'm used to it now - but it's completely ridiculous - my company is national and people call me at 8:00am and ask me, "Sorry I did wake you? I forget what time zone you're in..."

      --
      Authority questions you. Return the favor.
    13. Re:Typical governmental BS by Mattwolf7 · · Score: 1

      Or Indiana!

    14. Re:Typical governmental BS by Mspangler · · Score: 1

      "The main idea behind DST involves aligning the solar day with the average person's active hours to save energy consumed by residential electric lighting."

      Work hours in my area are 7:30 to 4, 7:30 to 4:30, 8 to 4:30, or 8 to 5. Having to turn the lights on the first hour of the day will exactly offset the advantage of leaving them off an hour later.

      In November it's already dark when the kids get on the bus at 7 AM. Now, it will be even darker. This is going to make it ever so much easier to get them moving. (\sarcasim)

      Also, residential lighting is not significantly powered by oil in the US.

      It's probably a ploy by business to con people into shopping more.

    15. Re:Typical governmental BS by Mspangler · · Score: 1

      "it's more a move to stimulate the economy." Yup! Especially that part about extending DST until After Thanksgiving weekend. More daylight, more spending. It's a simple theory. Especially if they can keep some of the cheapskates from storming the doors at opening to snap up the loss leaders before the one hours special sales end.

    16. Re:Typical governmental BS by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Having to turn the lights on the first hour of the day will exactly offset the advantage of leaving them off an hour later.

      Which is WHY we have DST. It is rolled-back to regular time in winter, when the sun won't be up in the morning.

      If you're in the far north of the country, in the shadow of a mountain, etc., you won't see the benefit, but most of the country will.

      Also, residential lighting is not significantly powered by oil in the US.

      Well, your car's headlights are, for one thing. Besides, though oil-burning doesn't make up a large chunk of the electric power you recieve, the electricity you recieve right after you get home from work is significantly more likely to come from burning oil than during other times of the day. Oil is commonly used for peak capacity electricity generation, so the odds are much higher that the electricity you are getting during that 1 hour (that DST affects) will be produced by oil.

      It's probably a ploy by business to con people into shopping more.

      I must compliment you... You really put the other tin-foil-hats to shame.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    17. Re:Typical governmental BS by ottffssent · · Score: 1

      Oh, I deliberately shied away from the whole mess that current DST is. Half of Indiana believing in it, half not - what's up with that?

      My ideal solution would be to use UTC. nyrk is right that there's too much inertia about arbitrary numbers on a clock face, and that's just considering this one country. When you start talking about even larger distances, time zones and all the myriad variations thereon just get messier and messier.

      Changing to UTC adds no additional complexity to any calculation involving time zones, and simplifies very many situations indeed.

    18. Re:Typical governmental BS by Mspangler · · Score: 1

      "Well, your car's headlights are, for one thing." Exactly. So now they will be on for the trip into town (at 7 AM), where before, they would be off. They will be off for the trip home (4 PM) either way, unless it's snowing. (We are talking November and March after all.) Result, I burn more gas by extending DST, not less. Natural gas is often used for peak generation, not oil. Around here (Eastern WA) it's mostly hydropower, with one nuclear plant tossed in.

    19. Re:Typical governmental BS by mibus · · Score: 1

      starting 1/3 of employees 2hr earlier than normal and 1/3 2hr later

      I really doubt this will work, at least not yet.

      Right now I work 9-5:30. I get up around 7:30 (after going to bed at maybe 11?), I get home a little after 6PM.

      If I start two hours earlier, I'm home early (yay!) at just after 4PM, but I'll also have to go to bed at 9PM now. I know it sounds ridiculous, but most people* wouldn't like that just because of the number of good TV shows that are 8:30-9:30, and 9:30-10:30.

      * including me, sometimes.

      If I start two hours later, I'm home after dinner (after 8PM - in time for TV, but my wife wouldn't be terribly happy!). I'd also be screwed sleep-wise, since my daughter (gorgeous 8-month-old that she is) thinks that 6:30-7:30 is wake-up time, and no amount of me pointing at my alarm settings is going to change that :-)

    20. Re:Typical governmental BS by evilviper · · Score: 1
      So now they will be on for the trip into town (at 7 AM), where before, they would be off.

      No, that's simply not how it works. I'm getting tired of slamming my head against the wall trying to educate you.

      You want to believe DST hurts you, despite the evidence, despite all the facts available, and nothing is going to convince you otherwise. Not much I can do in that case.

      Natural gas is often used for peak generation, not oil.

      Natural Gas, Coal, Oil, are all regularly used. Saying "not oil" is completely idiotic, as oil is commonly used.

      I don't believe natural gas powerplant make up a significant percentage (anywhere in the USA) outside of CA.

      Around here (Eastern WA) it's mostly hydropower, with one nuclear plant tossed in.

      Neither of which are very useful for supplying peak demand, so no doubt there is some coal, oil, or *cough* natural gas power plants.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    21. Re:Typical governmental BS by egriebel · · Score: 1
      If I start two hours later, I'm home after dinner (after 8PM - in time for TV, but my wife wouldn't be terribly happy!). I'd also be screwed sleep-wise, since my daughter (gorgeous 8-month-old that she is) thinks that 6:30-7:30 is wake-up time, and no amount of me pointing at my alarm settings is going to change that :-)

      I've had that problem too, no matter how much you try to point, explain, and even beg, they don't grasp the logic of the alarm clock. Even when they can talk and understand stuff, they still have a tough time understanding that "it's sleepy-time" early summer mornings when it looks like daylight to them. Come to think of it, they don't really grasp the concept of sleeping in on weekends either until they're older too :-)

      --
      ACHTUNG! Das computermachine ist nicht fuer gefingerpoken und mittengrabben. Ist nicht fuer gewerken bei das dumpkopfen.
    22. Re:Typical governmental BS by egriebel · · Score: 1
      Tax credits for corporations that stagger their workers' start times by a significant margin would save way more energy than this DST nonsense

      There is enough corporate welfare already, where's MY tax credit for the inconvience of getting up way-ass in the morning?

      --
      ACHTUNG! Das computermachine ist nicht fuer gefingerpoken und mittengrabben. Ist nicht fuer gewerken bei das dumpkopfen.
  61. And what of the maritime provinces? by burndive · · Score: 1

    Silly Canada. Thinks it's a country.

    --
    ...because "hacker" sounds way sexier than "code drone."
  62. Expert on NPR says national energy savings is 1-2% by ThatsWhatImThinking · · Score: 1

    You can hear the interesting segment here. The expert is a jerk... it's pretty funny. And then go here if you're bored

  63. States and policy by dacarr · · Score: 1

    Remember that the law for daylight savings time is not necessarily a mandatory one. Arizone, for one, does not participate.

    That said, I suspect there is nothing stating that (say) California is required to participate in this extension of DST, keeping it to their standard of 6-on-6-off.

    --
    This sig no verb.
  64. What!!! by ad0gg · · Score: 1
    The purpose of DST is not to remind you when to check your batteries. If it works for that too, fine; but that is something extra, not the reason for DST. Support or oppose the DST change for REAL reasons.

    I live in Arizona you insensitive clod!

    --

    Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

    1. Re:What!!! by koreaman · · Score: 0

      So do I. Arizonans unite against DST!

    2. Re:What!!! by Guy+LeDouche · · Score: 1

      Indeed. We do just fine without DST in Phoenix, why can't everybody else? It's an outdated and useless mechanism. The people who say that it saves energy costs are off their rockers.

      I for one would be happy if everybody would just use UTC/GMT. It would take a little getting used to, but it would be the best thing for everybody.

    3. Re:What!!! by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      I'll take an extra hour of daylight at the end of my day than at the beginning. I could care less if it's dark when I go to work. But if I get an extra hour to do things outside in the summer with my friends and family after I'm done working, works for me!

      In fact, I'd just assume have DST all year long. In the winter when I get home from work there is absolutely no time for a bike ride before dark.

    4. Re:What!!! by badasscat · · Score: 1

      In fact, I'd just assume have DST all year long.

      I agree. A lot of this depends on where you live; in NYC, during winter it gets dark at around 4:30PM, and the temperature drops accordingly. It's depressing. There is very little daylight as it is during winter, and then to have to leave work at 6PM and it's pitch black and 10 degrees (farenheit) outside... man, give me DST year-round and I will be your friend for life.

      Obviously, someone who lives in Arizona is not going to understand this.

    5. Re:What!!! by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      And I'm in Indiana, where we're finally going back to DST, catching up with the rest of the world. Some people think it's quaint to have different time than most everyone else, but in reality it's a foolish foible...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    6. Re:What!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      To paraphrase the late, great Sam Kinnison:

      You don't want daylight savings time... BECAUSE YOU LIVE IN A FUCKING DESERT! MOVE! MOVE!

      AAHHHGGGG!

    7. Re:What!!! by MemoryAid · · Score: 1
      If only the rest of the world had caught up with Indiana instead, we would be free of this abomination.

      By the way, how widespread is DST outside of the US?

      --
      Language students: Don't try to learn English here. This ain't it.
    8. Re:What!!! by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      They certainly use DST throughout Europe, I know that. I work for a Swedish company, and you'd be amazed how each year around clock-changing time teleconferences will get screwed up because participants from Wisconsin, Virginia, Pennsylvania, Sweden and Denmark all change time, but Indiana doesn't. It's a real problem, and frankly I don't care whether we do DST or not, or whether we go with Central or Eastern time, just that we be consistent with the rest of the world around us...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  65. Re:Use UTC by Soporific · · Score: 1

    But just watch. He's going to call this "Freedom Time" so that it passes through Congress like Taco Bell food.

    That has to be the best line I've seen in a while.

    ~S

  66. Complete solution by mgkimsal2 · · Score: 1

    Adjust the times *once* to be 30 minutes between the two times and be done with it forever... :)

  67. It's DayLIGHT savings time. by cryptochrome · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The purpose of DST is not to control when it gets dark. The purpose is to control when it gets LIGHT. People don't mind doing stuff after dark in the evening (much), but few enjoy getting up in the dark or wasting daylight by sleeping through it.

    To say nothing of the energy necessary to light the dark hours. Why do you think they implemented Daylight Savings in the first place? Have you seen the price of oil lately?

    Personally I think we all should all just use zulu time and let businesses and schools etc. set their own hours. Of course we'd have to stop thinking of 12 as noon and midnight... but then we could learn true times based on longitude instead.

    --

    ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

    1. Re:It's DayLIGHT savings time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but what percentage of energy is used for lighting? It must be tiny.

      The biggest consumer by far is industrial processes, one aluminium electrolysis plant can use 50MW.

      If you consider that the biggest users of electrical lighting (shops and offices), these tend to have lights on all the time, regardless of whether it's sunny or dark outside.

      Not to mention the fact that the price of oil has NOTHING to do with the price of electricity. I don't think there are any oil-based power plants left in the world.

    2. Re:It's DayLIGHT savings time. by cryptochrome · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sorry, but what percentage of energy is used for lighting? It must be tiny.

      If by tiny you mean up to 34%. Most figures I've heard suggest around 20% though, plus another 5% accounting for the need to run cooling systems to counteract the heat of the lighting systems. Of course, it's more significant to talk about this in quantitative rather than relative terms - so out of the 3,858 terawatt-hours consumed in 2003, that would be between 900 to 1300 terawatt-hours per year. And growing.

      Personally, I think thats a rather significant figure.

      Indeed, turning the lights off when you don't need them and using more efficient lighting saves a great deal of energy, particularly in commercial operations. Low surface-to-volume ratio and all. But for home use, daylight counts for a lot.

      As for oil, mining operations for coal or nuclear fuel and virtually all small-scale generators run on it. The cost of oil also has an indirect effect on the cost of other fuels by making them more attractive for certain applications and allowing them to charge a steeper price.

      --

      ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

    3. Re:It's DayLIGHT savings time. by rking · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but what percentage of energy is used for lighting? It must be tiny.

      And most of it is probably in offices where the lights are on all day regardless of sunlight or DST.

    4. Re:It's DayLIGHT savings time. by ILikeRed · · Score: 1

      My office has the lights on whenever anyone is working; actually, I have never seen any office that ran with the lights off, irregardless of the outdoor conditions, other than one small portion of a computer graphics studio, and there the lights were always off in certain areas because the workers did not like the effect of the floresent lights on their monitors. Same goes for stores, hotels, etc. I believe the whole point of DST is to get people to drive to the mall and spend money shopping, which does absolutely nothing to save energy. If you really like DST so much, please use real arguments to defend it.

      --
      I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm, and three or more is a congress -J Adams
    5. Re:It's DayLIGHT savings time. by russotto · · Score: 1

      In home use in many areas, lighting is completely insignificant. HVAC dominates. The refrigerator is a distant second, followed by electric hot water (if used), and the rest is lost in the noise. And when it is hot, it's better from an energy conservation viewpoint to block the outside light (and heat) and use artificial light inside.

    6. Re:It's DayLIGHT savings time. by russotto · · Score: 1

      BTW, the DOE page that your worldwatch page points to indicates that lighting accounts for only about 3.3% of energy use in homes! A far cry from 34%! Maybe someone lost a decimal somewhere.

    7. Re:It's DayLIGHT savings time. by cryptochrome · · Score: 1

      From the site:
      Although lighting accounts for only 3.3% of the energy use in homes, it often accounts for a large fraction of the electricity bill.

      That sentence makes no sense. A small percent of use but a large percent of the bill? How does that work? Are they figuring in the pure heat BTUs from the gas/oil driven appliances? If so it means little, since we've been talking about electricity here.

      --

      ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

  68. let's have Daylight Wasting Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's simply unbelievable that politicians can change time itself. it's less offensive to me if they can have the first night with all virgins.

    don't mess around with time please. change 9-5 to 8-4 if you would. geez.

  69. Zoneinfo by martok · · Score: 2, Informative

    I believe libc/zoneinfo for Linux systems would be able to handle this well enough as there are provisions for changing dst settings without affecting time in the past. pwt (pacific war time) during WWII is a good example of this and zoneinfo handles it correctly.

  70. No Fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will this fix the /. post delay?

    No, but it will allow more dupe posts of the same story, as confusion reigns about when the story came out.

  71. Which is the Standard time, then? by iShaman · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I haven't noticed lately, but (for US west coasters, in this case) does society still refer to Pacific Standard Time (PST) and Pacific Daylight Time (PDT)? And if so, since most of the months are now going to be on the adjusted schedule shouldn't they now be refered to as Standard Time, then?

    Also, something interesting from Wikipedia's entry on DST:
    When the U.S. went on extended DST in 1974 and 1975 in response to the 1973 energy crisis, Department of Transportation studies found that observing DST in March and April saved 10,000 barrels of oil a day, and prevented about 2,000 traffic injuries and 50 fatalities saving about U.S. $28 million in traffic costs.
    References are noted in the entry.
    1. Re:Which is the Standard time, then? by The+FooMiester · · Score: 1

      Because Standard time is REALLY what time it is, whereas Daylight time is what the government is saying the time is, however, they're wrong.

      --
      The previous has been a secret message to my comrades.
  72. your friendly microsoft reminder by Bananatree3 · · Score: 1

    newsman:We would like all of you to remember to turn your clocks backward one hour tonight before you go to bed.

    newsman:Oh yes, and remember to download the very latest Microsoft Critical DST patch for your computer, so tomarrow your Outlook email stamp will be the same time as the rest of the country.

  73. obviously by Madd+Scientist · · Score: 1

    "is there enough time to implement change?" uh... yes. any correct implementation would take 1 line of code changed to adjust.

  74. Broken Window Fallacy by cookie_cutter · · Score: 1
    While this may be good for you, let us not act like that is a good reason for enacting this law, for doing so would just be proclaiming a version of the broken window fallacy.

    The idea is that breaking windows (or in this case, artificially breaking software) is good for the economy because it creates work for the glazzier/software developer, who then has money to buy stuff from the baker, and the store owner, etc.

    It's a fallacy because no new money has actually been created, as the window owner, instead of having the window AND money to put into the economy, now just has a window and less money.

    1. Re:Broken Window Fallacy by A+Dafa+Disciple · · Score: 1

      Nobody said anything about creating "new money" for me and my family. We're just talking about forcing some of the larger companies' money to trickle down to us. ;)

    2. Re:Broken Window Fallacy by telecsan · · Score: 1

      That all depends on how wealthy the window owner is. If the window owner is BillyG, then there is no decrease in spending on the part of the harmed.

      The differential that would need to be examined would be the spending opportunity loss on the part of those requiring expenditures (in this case, mostly larger corporations) vs. the spending opportunity gained by the IT professionals who stand to gain from this.

      If those were equal, the broken window would be a net zero.

      However, it can in reality be unbalanced either direction based on the ones suffering harm vs. the ones gaining. In the end, it's the individual's savings rate that determines the effect on the money supply.

    3. Re:Broken Window Fallacy by mjh · · Score: 1

      Yes, but what you're missing (and the point of the broken window falacy) is that you're not seeing something in the equation. And that is where that money might have trickled down to if it hadn't been forced to be spent on fixing the date. If the date needs to be fixed, those companies have to spend money to fix the date. If they don't have to fix the date, they have both a working date mechanism and the money that they didn't have to spend to fix it. That money might have been spent on something else, but we'll never see it because it was spent reparing something that should have worked. The entire economy is that much poorer because it was forced to fix something that was already working.

      Think of it another way. If breaking things that are already working is beneficial to society, we should all become terrorists. We should destroy as much as we possibly can because it will (in the end) make us richer.

      It's false. In the end, the more that we are required to fix things that had previously been working, the poorer we all are. Some of us (the fixers) may be richer, but that's only at the expense of the rest of us who are poorer.

      --
      Key to financial independence: Spend less than you earn. Save and invest the difference. Do it for a long time.
  75. They should change the names, too. by Robotech_Master · · Score: 3, Funny

    If we're going to be in Daylight Savings Time 9 months out of the year, they should call Daylight Savings Time "Standard" time, instead, and change Standard Time to "Daylight Wasting Time" (DWT).

    --
    Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
  76. You're missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This change is not being made to save daylight. It is being made to save energy. The point to get have people using less lights because it will be brighter outside at a given hour. I'm not sure how effective it will be but that is the reason it is happening.

  77. The Irony of DST by ndansmith · · Score: 1
    The funny thing about Daylight Savings Time is that it doesn't save anything, it simply moves the daylight to a different "time" of day. The system has always cracked me up. We basically get everyone to shift their entire day an hour earlier just so we can utilize more sunlight at the end of the day and save on electricity. From an IT standpoint, I think it would be much easier to keep the clocks the same and just have everyone's schedule move up one hour. It would have the same result, without all the technical hassle.

    Of course, the irony of this idea is that it wouldn't work. People would get all offended that the government is "forcing" them to open and close their shops an hour earlier, when in reality the government is doing just that with DST, but for some reason people accept it when the method is changing the clocks. Governing people is a tricky business.

    1. Re:The Irony of DST by aXis100 · · Score: 1

      What I dont understand is that they "save daylight" during summer, when there's an abundance of extra sun. I dont see the point.

      It would be more practical during winter when it gets dark so early that people cant play outdoor sports etc (assuming its not too cold).

  78. How about just eliminating the change by pyite69 · · Score: 1

    Time changes are ridiculous in the first place.

    1. Re:How about just eliminating the change by smbarbour · · Score: 1

      I second that motion.

  79. Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stupid God damned fat slob Americans. While the rest of the world works towards finding alternative sources of energy, you stupid fat slobs and your fucking SUVs putting around your shit ridden cities thinking up "solutions" like extending DST.

    America is spiraling down the drain. Good riddence.

  80. Re:First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...because you didn't!

  81. sunlight and happiness by slash-CO- · · Score: 1

    Sunlight seems to have an effect on our overall happiness and moods. I notice that when I wake up on bright sunny days that I tend to be happier overall. On dark and rainy days I'm more likely to be depressed. The amount this effects moods may vary from person to person, and I'm not saying that I've never had a great day even though it was raining, but I think there is something to it. Also, darkness outside tends to make us sleepy. It is often harder to wake up in the morning if it is still dark outside. So if this increase in daylight savings time means there's more sunlight when I'm awake and active, then I think that is a good thing, in addition to decreasing the amount of energy we need to use. Of course it is also possible that we would just get used to more sun and its effect would then be unnoticed.

  82. "Extra" daylight by jennis · · Score: 1

    I love these congresspeople who say "We'll have more daylight, so we'll save energy".

    Uh, no we won't. Rays from the sun will strike the earth each day for the same exact amount of time, whether we observe DST or not.

    Here's an idea, why don't they pass a law to make daylight-savings time year round. Then pass another law that requires every single scheduled thing in the United States to be moved back an hour. Then everyone will have all the "extra daylight" they need.

  83. Nitpickers take yet another note! by viva_fourier · · Score: 1

    DST != Deep Space Ten, a new, exciting, reality based Star Trek series that is exactly one order of magnitude in quality above any previous space station-centered plotlines.

    --
    and now back to the fallout shelter...
  84. Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In fact, Canada is currently undecided on the matter.

    Personally, as a Canadian, I hope that whatever decision is reached will be based on the actual merits of the proposal (as opposed to blindly following the lead of our neighbour to the south).

  85. It's "Daylight Saving Time" by heredity · · Score: 1

    Without the 's'

    1. Re:It's "Daylight Saving Time" by DavidinAla · · Score: 1

      I'm glad that SOMEBODY else still knows that. It doesn't even make sense with the plural added.

    2. Re:It's "Daylight Saving Time" by joe_n_bloe · · Score: 1

      Right, that malaprop annoys the living hell out of me too. But, you know, everyone says "K-Mart's" anyway. S's rule.

  86. Breaking laws of reality. by vertinox · · Score: 1

    "The more daylight we have, the less electricity we use,'' said U.S. Rep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.), who co-sponsored the measure with U.S. Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.).

    That sounds logical, until you realize that the amount of daylight is going to be the same regardless of what time it is and what time you wake up or go to sleep.

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  87. No DST worked for me! by Dr.+Transparent · · Score: 3, Funny

    Blessed AZ. Giving the finger to you time switchers the world over.

    I agree no DST is awesome.

    1. Re:No DST worked for me! by m_TheRedHead · · Score: 1

      I agree it is very nice for a lot of things.

      However, if you work with other countries and other time zones it becomes brutal. All of your meetings shift an hour when their time changes while they stay the same in their calendars. 8am meetings are bad enough but when they become 7...ouch

    2. Re:No DST worked for me! by RayMarron · · Score: 1

      Damn straight. Here in AZ, daylight *kills*.

      --
      ON DELETE CASCADE
    3. Re:No DST worked for me! by aCC · · Score: 1

      Lots of fingers in China too...

  88. NPR expert says saves 1-2 percent by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    You can hear the interesting segment here. The expert is a jerk... it's pretty funny.

    Even if it does save 1-2 percent, we could save 20 percent just by getting rid of the tax deduction for low MPG cars bought for businesses, or even more if we got rid of subsidies for imported oil and natural gas.

    Efficiency is all relative. Even Saudi Arabia is switching to wind power.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  89. problem? by xbmodder · · Score: 1

    A coupla things. At my company we use a server that's company has gone out of business for about 3 years now. If it changed we would have to either hack it to death which would be violating the EULA or by some new software. This might help the economy though. Maybe someone is smart enough to prod bush to create some huge problem so we have to hire more people to fix it. *fingers crossed* I don't want to have to reverse engineer that app. Its code is ugly and the time libraries are not disassembling nicely. (problems like wierd pointers?!?!) /me is gunna need alotta cofee.

    1. Re:problem? by RoboRay · · Score: 1

      If the company has gone out of the business, why are you worried about the EULA?

    2. Re:problem? by xbmodder · · Score: 1

      Cause they were bought by another company and they did contact me when I used two extra liscenses.

  90. How about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about just taking politics out of it. Let's have none of these stupid time changes at all. If people want to go to work earlier or later at one time of year, fine. But what does it matter what you call that time, as long as you keep it consistant, and keep the Feds out of it? Do they really think that farmer Brown is going to get out of bed at a different hour just because they call it 5 instead of 4? No. The cows need milking when the cows need milking.

    These assholes in Congress ought to be busy repealing laws rather than writing new ones.

  91. No, it works too well. by lheal · · Score: 1

    Obviously, since the savings from increasing DST will be so great, why not just extend it to the whole year? Maximize the savings!

    Makes sense to me.

    --
    Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
    1. Re:No, it works too well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One yeart go back an hour, the next year go foward an hour

    2. Re:No, it works too well. by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Sure, if you want your kids going to school in the dark (well, people in northern lattitudes are used to this, but still).

      Every time this issue comes up the suggestion to go to DST only comes up, but in the end the kids-in-the-dark argument ends up trumping all other arguments time and time again.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
  92. Shouldn't be a big deal under *nix by linuxwrangler · · Score: 1

    All the necessary info is in zoneinfo or tz files. Look in /usr/share/zoneinfo on Linux for the compiled timezone files. Your local zone is just the appropriate file copied or linked to /etc/localtime.

    Substituting new zoneinfo files should be all that is needed for apps that rely on the system timezone stuff.

    I'm sure that the change will be in a monthly update from M$ so Windoze should also be OK as long as people update ('course the update requirement goes for *nix as well...)

    Just Google "zoneinfo" and hit "I'm feeling lucky" for plenty more info.

    For programs with hardwired code all bets are off.

    --

    ~~~~~~~
    "You are not remembered for doing what is expected of you." - Atul Chitnis
    1. Re:Shouldn't be a big deal under *nix by Anonymous+Crowbar · · Score: 3, Informative

      Tzedit.exe from Microsoft will allow you to create your custom designed time zone registry entries. One thing is they MUST be within 12 hours of the system's GMT (UNC) value or they will not load.

  93. More than IT by ytwang · · Score: 1

    This also threatens trade and travel because the time will be out of sync with Europe and Canada.

    The Toronto Star has a more in depth look at the issues.

  94. Should be Easy for Developers... by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

    Well, we all know that after the whole year 2000 thingy, developers paid more attention to avoiding hard-coded numbers in their apps, drivers and network protocol implementations. So really this should be something read in from a text file (.ini) or maybe synchronised to the operating system.

    Isn't that what happened?

  95. Re:Death to DST and Time Zones by schleyfox · · Score: 1

    I hate DST and timezones. We should all use GMT. People, the numbers are arbitrary! Converting between timezones is pain and really unnescesary. As it is times aren't standard due to culture (even with time zones), compare the eating times of someone in spain to someone in America for example. The whole system in antiquated and unnescesary. Yes I realise it won't ever change but heck, this is slashdot.

  96. Obligatory Simpsons reference... by Robber+Baron · · Score: 1

    First time I've ever been early for work! ...except for all those daylight savings days...lousy farmers!

    --

    You're using her as bait, Master!

  97. Federal Gov = Programmer Full Employment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a programmer in the public health arena I've always called the Federal Government the Programmer Full Employment Agency.

    If they stopped changing rules and regulations, we'd have finished programming a long time ago.

  98. leaders don't pass laws by klossner · · Score: 1
    OP is wrong. That the leaders have signed off just means they've agreed to move it forward. There's still the little matter of getting majority votes in both houses before the bill goes to the president.

    Daylight Saving Time is a carefully-balanced compromise between the needs of southern and northern latitudes. If this silly law passes, it upsets the balance for us northerners. My kids in Portland Oregon will have to bike to school before sunrise in March and November -- that's a safety nightmare. We'll be using more electricity in the morning, not less in the evening.

  99. The big question is why? by sporri · · Score: 1

    Ok, I live i Iceland were we stopped this nonsense years ago but the question remains. Why on earth should we meddle with the clock? There is no value in this, if you want to earn an extra hour in the sunshine deal with your boss, wake up an hour earlier and please leave yours and mine timing device alone.

    Could anyone please explain to me with simple arguments why anyone wants to change the time. And please not this earn an extra hour +!*##, we can do that without changing the time if we feel like it.

  100. The Week Of Confusion will now be extended to 2mn by hta · · Score: 1

    Being a frequent participant in transatlantic phone conferences, I've always dreaded the Week Of Confusion in March where the US has changed its clock and Europe hasn't (or was it the other way around?). Half the participants late (or early) by one hour, almost every time.
    Now I understand that's going to be 2 months of confusion a year.
    THANK YOU, Mr. Bush!

  101. Energy Independence by confundido · · Score: 1

    We want to save oil. Let's take this further. why are we paying mere lip service to investing in alternative energy sources? Imagine the work that could have been created in 2001 if after Sept 11th, our government would have invested the billions we have spent bombing and rebuilding other nations when we could have made ourselves stronger and more self-reliant at home? We could have also made the stipulation that US tax payer dollars be used to hire only americans and legal residents for the research and development--that way, US firms could not off-shore it.

    I mean great, there will be more jobs for IT workers as they rush to change code, but this too can be off-shored.

    --
    Wenn Fliegen hinter Fliegen fliegen, fliegen Fliegen Fliegen nach.
    1. Re:Energy Independence by magadass · · Score: 0

      You need mental help, seriously!

      --
      "If I was smarter I could rule the world!"
  102. Tax dollars hard at work by C3ntaur · · Score: 1

    It's shit like this that keeps me thinking that the Libertarians are on to something. I mean really, why the hell do we do DST in the first place? More to the point, why do we pay our congresscritters to *legislate* it??? This is not an area where the government needs to be involved, period.

    --
    Loading...
    1. Re:Tax dollars hard at work by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1
      ...the Libertarians are on to something. I mean really, why the hell do we do DST in the first place?

      Yeah! And really, why do people in different towns need to stay on the same timebase? We have enough computers to know if the town five miles over is two hours behind or fifteen minutes ahead of us! In fact, why don't we let each person have his or her own timekeeping system! We're all adult enough to handle our own synchronization! What could be the harm? Damn government! Always interfering...

      --
      That is all.
  103. I wish it were so... But... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    But unless you are a consultant that has the ability to change an OS, or the system clock in the hardware your out of luck. Most applications get the Time from the OS. The rare few that don't will (Which I haven't seen any, because it takes more programming and processing power, handling a separate thread just to get the time, seems overboard to me) will still run with correct data unlike they y2k bug which made the year next year smaller then the previous. The only thing would be the computer will be off by an hour. If you go crazy and raise your rates you will probably loose business because you are too expensive.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:I wish it were so... But... by Anonymous+Crowbar · · Score: 1

      Time Machine from Solution-Soft can provide an application with any timezone you want regardless of the systems core time. Citrix has this as well. But then you have to be running terminal server as well. Using tzedit.exe from microsoft you can create any timezone registry variable you want and then use that to test with. Any problems will appear in multi-national applications, for example server in Paris talking to server in NYC where the application was writen to take care of the hour offsets based on previously known values. Things like that. I think there's going to be a bit of extra testing across IT America.

  104. Come on by -p5ych0- · · Score: 1

    If the time was now 5 hours back or forward would you be doing something different right now? You would still be at the same point in the day, but the clock shows a different number. Changing an entire nation's time just to get people up an hour earlier is a waste. Just go to bed an hour before you usually do if you want the extra sunlight.

  105. DST built into hardware not just software by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

    Seriously-Many applications have DST deep in the code.

    Daylight savings is built into hardware not just software, some clock/calendar chips expect the days to be particular Sundays in particular months.

    1. Re:DST built into hardware not just software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can you site any specific examples?

      Given the fact that different countries and or states can adopt different time zones at will (whic may or may not use DST) applications should use timezone libraries to determine the time, not hard code it in hardware.

      Vendors that hard code library logic in hardware are eventually going to get what they deserve. :)

    2. Re:DST built into hardware not just software by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

      can you site any specific examples?

      I don't recall the part numbers. I just remember seeing the functionality in the docs for some parts we were using in embedded telco stuff in the 90s. Most of our parts (PIC, PIT, UART, etc) were fairly similar to what you find in a PC/AT. The functionality was optional and I believe we configured the clock/calendar to disable automatic time adjustments.

  106. Get rid of time zones AND DST! by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1

    We should just redefine local time "0000" the moment when dawn breaks at any given location.

  107. It's not about farmers by srleffler · · Score: 1
    Actually, that's a myth. Look it up on Google. Farmers have generally been opposed to DST. It doesn't help them harvest their crops in the summer because they work from sunrise to sunset regardless. It does cause them inconvenience however because they have to adjust their schedule for milking cows, feeding livestock, etc. The animals don't do DST.

    DST has always been much more about the needs of urban people who work 9 to 5.

    1. Re:It's not about farmers by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      Daylight savings is still messed up. The peak sunlight hours is noon to about 5pm.

      It should shift 3 hrs back, so that the peak sunlight hours are 3pm to 8pm. More people can use sunlight late in the day, including farmers.

  108. um. No. by alhaz · · Score: 1

    This is guaranteed not to conserve energy.

    There is mountains of data that shows that if it's light out, more people are driving.

    Extending DST so that there are more daylight hours in the evening is guaranteed to increase the number of cars on the road during those hours.

    --
    This is just like television, only you can see much further.
  109. I'll be performing a check on systems by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    that could be affected. One sec. Ok done.

    In Arizona we don't do DST. I always liked not having it since it made little sense to change the clocks around to me, and it means a consistent UTC offset (UTC -7). Now there's another reason to like it.

    I'm sure there are problably some good arguments for DST, but it just seems silly to me. If you want to alter your summer schedule and change when you get up, go ahead and do it. You don't need to change your clock for that.

    Perhaps this BS will encourage more states to choose to not observe DST.

  110. Arizona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Arizona does just fine without DST. Just get rid of it.

  111. As a Canadian by CokeJunky · · Score: 1

    Well, our government has been talking about that we would likely follow the change up here, for business reasons.

    I for one will be really unhappy if this is the case. The further north you go, the less sense DST makes (plus for those Saskatchewanners out there that don't change at all -- farmers work by the sun, not the clock, and they make up the largest part of their population.)

    By november here, (in Edmonton, AB) there are less than 6 hours of daylight and even without DST they all occur during regular business hours. I leave home in the dark, don't see the sun all day in my internal office, and go home in the dark... So all that the change does is cause annoyance by changing something that is already annoying.

    Now during the summer here, with DST, the sun rises around 5:30 and sets close to 10 or 11. There is so little dark during the day, that again, it doesn't matter if you use DST or not, it won't affect energy use or productivity. Since most of the states is closer to the equator than most of canada, I can see that in some areas (Like Texas) DST may have a much more signifigant effect, but I hope that Canada doensn't follow in that change because I don't want to change my ways!

    --
    More Caffeine. NOW
  112. Tax Law by JanneM · · Score: 1

    Every year, in every country, laws change. New laws are added, old ones revoked. A lot of changes affect businesses in various ways. And those changes more often than not need to be reflected in the IT systems of said businesses. That's not only about tax rates or VAT application, but also things like what data you need to save, what kind of reporting you need to support, what info to make available (or not) to what employees.

    IT systems need to change to reflect this changing environment every year (90% of all software development is 'in house' or client specific; this kind of thing accounts for a lot of it). Changing the start and end date of daylight savings is one pretty minor one among all the others.

    Of course, it's more fun to hyperventilate about an issue than think it through :)

    --
    Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    1. Re:Tax Law by fishbowl · · Score: 1


      >Every year, in every country, laws change.

      Not all laws require doublethink.
      DST does.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  113. Special Note for Arizona and East Indiana by Propaganda13 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Deal with it, suckers!

  114. Re:Expert on NPR says national energy savings is 1 by rwade · · Score: 1

    If you're not interested in this expert's opion, the radio personalities of NPR's Cartalk have ideas of their own.

  115. Cant. . . .What about traveling by ookabooka · · Score: 1

    If we all ran on GMT or some other common time zone, our watches and everything, then traveling would be VERY confusing. Imagine getting up at 07:00 hours, eating at 12:00 hours, going to sleep at 23:00 hours, etc. Now travel to europe, suddenly the sun won't come up at 07:00 hours, but instead 12:00 hours, those 12:00 lunch appointments? over here they are at 17:00. Just after you set your watch to wake you up in the morning, you have to travel to the west coast, wake up at 04:00. . . .

    Savings time is only in existance to make sunrise and sunset coincide with our daily lives. In Michigan's upper peninsula, sunset can be anywhere from about 5:00pm to 10:00 pm. Personally, I think we can survive without DST, but ditching timezones would be pandemonium.

    --
    If you are about to mod me down, keep in mind that this post was most likely sarcastic.
    1. Re:Cant. . . .What about traveling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If everyone was on the same time, you could just ask someone what time lunch is. If the appointment is at 17:00, then they'll say "17:00", not "12:00". Yes, it's weird, but you'd get used to it, just like you've gotten used to changing your watch everytime you go more than a few hundred miles east or west.

  116. Effects on Pay by dakirw · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, we'd probably see our paychecks shrivel by the same ratio as the newly truncated workday.

    1. Re:Effects on Pay by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      Big deal. More and more workers are preferring more time off versus a 5k raise. Not that this is a valid linear relationship. It turns out that there's certain fixed costs that an employer needs to recover, and when the French passed a law restricting people to working less than 35 hours in an effort to fight unemployment, things continued to worsen. Irony at its finest, or are the French simply lazy?

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

  117. This was tried before! by 0star · · Score: 2, Informative

    In the early 1970's, the USA tried to make daylight saving times go year round to save energy. I was a kid then, and remember waiting for the school bus in the dark. An outcry from parents about safety (deservedly so, in my opinion) caused them to quickly rescind it. History repeats itself, and this attempt may be the "farce" part if parents speak up again. Hopefully some kids won't die in the dark and make it the "tragedy" part.

  118. this is stupid by psycobrat · · Score: 0

    we should be getting rid of the time change all to gether.

    there is no reason to keep it.

  119. Sweden did this a few years ago by TorKlingberg · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sweden changed the DST period few years ago. As far as I remember there were no big problems.

    Microsoft changed it through some Windows patch, and *nix people tend to fix things themself :-)

    1. Re:Sweden did this a few years ago by Derling+Whirvish · · Score: 4, Informative
      Sweden changed the DST period few years ago. As far as I remember there were no big problems.

      Sweden is a poor choice for an example as they seem to be able to do these things better than most countries. Heck, they switched from driving on the left to driving on the right in 1967 and there were no big problems!

    2. Re:Sweden did this a few years ago by zCyl · · Score: 1

      Heck, they switched from driving on the left to driving on the right in 1967 and there were no big problems!

      So they just blew a loud whistle at midnight and everyone quick swerved to the other side?

    3. Re:Sweden did this a few years ago by RoboRay · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it really sucked for the people driving on divided highways at the moment. Only a few with 4-wheel-drive made it.

    4. Re:Sweden did this a few years ago by Derling+Whirvish · · Score: 3, Informative
    5. Re:Sweden did this a few years ago by StarsAreAlsoFire · · Score: 1

      ...well... almost everyone.

    6. Re:Sweden did this a few years ago by swiftstream · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough, the old way of driving on the left leaves a significant legacy. Trains, subways, etc. still ride on the left track rather than the right, which can be momentarily confusing to a newcomer to the country.

      --
      Be a PATRIOT--because the only thing we have to fear is the lack thereof.
    7. Re:Sweden did this a few years ago by egriebel · · Score: 1
      Sweden changed the DST period few years ago.

      So, you mean to tell me I missed that hot date with the Swedish Bikini Team just because our watches were set differently?!? And all these years I thought they just stood me up, damn that Bill Gates!
      --
      ACHTUNG! Das computermachine ist nicht fuer gefingerpoken und mittengrabben. Ist nicht fuer gewerken bei das dumpkopfen.
    8. Re:Sweden did this a few years ago by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      Wow! How often do you drive a train while on vacation?

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    9. Re:Sweden did this a few years ago by swiftstream · · Score: 1

      Heh ;-)

      Actually, I've lived in Sweden the past year, and took the train and subway to and from school every day. Believe it or not, seeing the train coming up on the left side of the tracks was significantly disorienting the first few times I rode it.

      --
      Be a PATRIOT--because the only thing we have to fear is the lack thereof.
  120. Consumption of power... by javabandit · · Score: 1

    I actually thought that the reason daylight savings time existed was to conserve power during World War I.

    With the extension of daylight by one hour, it means that it saves one hour worth of time where people will not be turning on all the lights in their house. When added up over hundreds of thousands of homes, this is a huge power savings. You want people to be going to bed as close to sunset as possible to save the most amount of "after work - at home" energy.

  121. Software yes, Atomic hardware no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about those "Atomic Clocks" sold at Radio Shack and Wal-mart?

  122. Just get rid of it altogether.. by sillybilly · · Score: 1

    I personally am too lazy to change my wrist watches and alarm clocks around, so during the winter I just mentally subtract an hour. What are you actually saving here? Daylight hours, so rush hour traffic doesn't drive in the dark at 7am? It doesn't bother me that the clock says 5pm when it's still 4pm.

    I usually just procrastinate until January or February, then I don't have to procrastinate anymore, because the reasoning, that, - if I waited this long, I might as well wait that other month rather than bother - starts sounding good. It just doesn't bother me enough that the clock says 8am, when it's really only 7am still, it's so easy to mentally deduct 1 hour each time I look, rather that work up the effort to walk to the clock and dick with the buttons. Maybe when the clock gets a remote control.

    One good reason for this move by Bush, could be the adoption of Windows Longhorn, because now your past OS's won't automatically know and adjust to the correct dailight savings time, and instead bug you in middle of september! You gotta give the guy credit for trying to boost the economy by any means necessary, but how about adopting the metric system once and for all, for Pete's sake.

  123. i get it now.... by mike_quinlivan · · Score: 1

    so thats what our country has been doing

  124. fishy energy policy by fermion · · Score: 1
    This really sounds like the congress is trying to pretend that it has an energy conservation policy, but really does not. It is like mandating fuel effeciency for cars, but subsidizing the purchase of Hummers for personal at 40% or more.

    So, lets look at reality. They say it will save 100,000 barrels of oil, and we use like 20 million. Now is that 100,000 for only those sixty days, i.e. 6 millon? This would mean that the savings for the year would be around 0.08%. Or are those sixty days going to save 600,000 barrels, or 3% each for each new day. If there is a fairy that would magically decrease oil usage by 3%, why haven't we brought it out before.

    The other issue is that the longest day is in the summer, and the shortest day in the winter, while the equinoxes are in late march and september. This means the day and night are the same leangth in late March, but the day shorter in early March. DST should take advantage of the longer days. That is we can set out clock forward because it will still be light later. However, until near the end of march the day is still recovering from the winter short days. So for instance in chicago, the day is only 11 hours long. In november the issue is even worse, some places getting less than 10 hours of sun. Whatever you gain in the evening, you lose in the morning. Everyone, especially in the fall, will get to work in the dark, and work for an hour, and then can use sunlit. I will put a snide remark here about the peopell in washington not knowing this because they work 10 to 3.

    This is like the oil reserves in Alaska. If they get built, in many years, they may provide a tenth of a percent more output to the world oil supply, providing almost no releif for prices, but it is still a more reasonable thing to do than tell people to turn off the damn TV when they go to sleep.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  125. Farm based economy here we come! by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    1. Re:Farm based economy here we come! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why has no one responded to or even acknowledged that excerpt on rollingstone.com? It's too bad the immediately following posts were jokes about stepping in cow shit. At least when the big fat American oil world ends they'll have their sense of humor.

    2. Re:Farm based economy here we come! by srleffler · · Score: 1

      Hmmm. I think he's right that oil production is going to begin to decline relatively soon and that that will have a huge impact on world (and especially U.S.) economy and culture. I think he has way overestimated the impact, though, largely because he overestimates how quickly oil will become scarce. I'm no expert, but I suspect things will evolve more slowly than that. If we're lucky, increasing energy prices will push people to make different lifestyle choices (hybrid cars, no SUVs, living closer to work, building nuclear plants, etc.) quickly enough to prevent the complete devastation he predicts. It's still going to be a painful transition, though. Oil is still going to be available for a long time. It's just going to be much more expensive than we are used to. Countries that are less suburbanized and more nuclearized will be impacted less and will have an advantage in the new worldwide economy.

  126. Windows and UTC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone know if Longhorn will finally store
    the system time as UTC, like any sane OS obviously
    must do, or will continue the questionable
    tradition of all the other Windows to store the
    system time as local time, with all the
    unfortunate consequences that has?

  127. One word: Microsoft by overshoot · · Score: 1
    For all those pointing out that zoneinfo files will make this easy on *nix, do please keep in mind that MS systems (that is, the great majority) don't use zoneinfo.

    In fact, they use the hardware clock -- most of which do DST at hardware-preset dates last time I looked. If not, it's still hardcoded in the OS.

    The difference is that one will take years to get straightened out and the other will take even longer.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
    1. Re:One word: Microsoft by ummit · · Score: 1

      According to this post, Microsoft uses an essentially zoneonfo-like mechanism embedded in the Registry. So it sounds like it's no harder to patch Windows than *nix.

    2. Re:One word: Microsoft by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      Microsoft's system is not like zoneinfo, it is more like the oldfashioned TZ environment variable.
      They can store only a single DST definition per timezone, they don't have the capability of setting a different DST definition per range of years that zoneinfo offers.

    3. Re:One word: Microsoft by ummit · · Score: 1

      Oh, dear. I see. Thanks for the correction.

  128. Problems in Canada by sabot99 · · Score: 1
    This may cause a lot of problems in Canada.

    Right now, Canada's DST matches the U.S. (except for Saskatchewan). But if the U.S. extends DST and Canada follows suit, Canadians are going to spending a lot more time communting in the dark because of their higher latitude.

    However, NOT changing may cause even more problems. An example from the CBC:

    The last time the United States and Canada observed different winter time systems was during the 1974-75 oil crisis. The U.S. did not turn its clocks back at all that fall in an attempt to conserve energy.

    As a result, airline schedules involving flights from south of the border were occasionally one hour off, television schedules were mixed up and business associates regularly missed each other's phone calls.

  129. Why can't those Congressmorons by KwKSilver · · Score: 1

    Set it one way, or the other and then ... LEAVE IT ALONE!?" My astronomy professor had it right: daylight Savings time is like cutting a foot off of the bottom of your blanket and sewing it back on the top to make it longer. If anything lots of time is "lost" or wasted at each transition. Only a Congressmoron could fail to see that.

    --
    If you want your life to be different, live it differently.
  130. I'm more worried by bahwi · · Score: 1

    About a second after 2038-01-19T03:14:07Z!

  131. Abolish STANDARD time by poptones · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I HATE non-DST time. The winter days are already too short, working standard time in an office means you go to work when it's dark AND you leave work when it's almost dark. No time to go to the park, race RC cars, nothing. It's like living in perpeptual night and I hate it.

    1. Re:Abolish STANDARD time by floodo1 · · Score: 0

      first up props for rc racing.

      now to the point....the clock has nothing to do with winter days being too short. you already said that you goto work before its daylight, and you get home a little before daylight ends.

      this leaves few solutions.....
      work less time, so you can either goto or leave work during daylight
      goto work later/earlier, sacrifice.....goto work when its REALLy dark to get off when daylight is left over....or goto work when its daylight and work into the night.

      either way clock really doesnt have anything to do with total available daylight

      --
      I KUT J00 M4NG!!!
    2. Re:Abolish STANDARD time by paulbiz · · Score: 0

      If you have such a busy schedule (that can't be fulfilled on the weekends, apparently), perhaps you should get a night job.

    3. Re:Abolish STANDARD time by elemental23 · · Score: 1

      Have you considered moving south (assuming you're in the northern hemisphere) or finding work that gives you a more flexible schedule? Either of those seem like a more reasonable solution than mucking with the time zones yet again. I'm all for doing away with daylight savings time altogether.

      --
      I like my women like my coffee... pale and bitter.
    4. Re:Abolish STANDARD time by babyrat · · Score: 1

      Never thought of that - perhaps they should open the parks and allow RC racing early in the morning, like before you have to go to work. Maybe THAT is what the government should be legislating instead! I personally fully believe in the right to race RC cars before 6am.

    5. Re:Abolish STANDARD time by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1
      You do realise that winter time is real time, right? Winter days are shorter than summer days, no matter what (well, except on the equator). If you don't like short winter days, move to a lower lattitude.

      DST makes one get up earlier in the summer; it has no effect on winter.

    6. Re:Abolish STANDARD time by thoth · · Score: 1

      This is the problem... instead of time zones that generally follow longitutde, we need time zones that also account for latitude. Now your time will vary by longitutde and latitude... because that is SO MUCH easier than having the lazy boneheads of the world get up earlier, get to work earlier and leave work earlier to enjoy afternoon sunshine.

      If the winter days are short, that means the summer days are long. ENJOY IT or move the hell to the equator where the days are about the same length year round.

  132. Government would not solve the problem today by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

    Because there's no real prospect for profit in the short to medium term by developing alternate fuels. When something needs to be done for the public good that doesn't have immediate profit potential, the only way it will get done is by putting government money into it.

    Keep in mind that today's short-term outlook may be very different from next year's short-term outlook or the short-term outlook five years from now. By then the cost of traditional fuels may be high enough that alternative fuels will become cost effective and industry will jump on it. We may be very near such a tipping point. Government intervention may not be required. Also, government investment may not be very quick or cost effective. If you throw a lot of money at it today the money will most likely disappear into various pork barrel projects that produce nothing worthwhile. Why, for the same reason that industry is doing nothing. There is no perceived crisis or need. We are not going to get large scale alternative fuels from industry or government until there is a perceived need.

  133. That link needs registration-here's the story text by Joey+Patterson · · Score: 1, Informative

    Jul. 20, 2005. 04:39 PM

    U.S. puts Canada in time crunch
    American move will extend daylight time
    Businesses fear being out of sync will cause chaos
    TONY WONG AND SUSAN DELACOURT
    STAFF REPORTERS

    Canadian business leaders fear major economic disruption if this country does not get in step with an American move to extend daylight saving time.

    Yesterday, the U.S. Congress quietly adopted a provision to extend daylight hours by two months after proponents argued the scheme would help curb energy use by cutting back on the need for artificial light in the evening. Under the legislation, part of a sweeping energy package, daylight saving time across most of the United States will now start on the first weekend in March and run through the last weekend in November. Daylight time now runs from April through October in Canada and the U.S.

    "There is potential for huge confusion here, and we need to be vigilant, to look at the range of implications," said Len Crispino, president and CEO of the Ontario Chamber of Commerce.

    The change, expected to take effect this fall, would mean clocks in Canada and the United States would be out of sync in March and November, causing scheduling headaches for travellers and TV viewers.

    And should Canada decide to follow the American lead, farmers and rural schoolchildren, who already get up in the dark, would face even gloomier mornings.

    But as things now stand, the implications for business are serious because the economies of the two countries are so integrated, said Crispino.

    Businesses such as airlines, transportation and even Ontario's auto sector could be affected, since many automotive manufacturers use "just in time" delivery systems to get car parts to plants, Crispino said. And the Toronto Stock Exchange, for instance, would open and close one hour after New York's markets.

    While business is waking up to the risk, the issue seems to have sneaked under the political radar in Canada. "This has not been an issue that Canadians have debated at any length," Prime Minister Paul Martin's spokesperson Scott Reid said yesterday.

    "We'll monitor how the issue unfolds in the Congress with an eye to implications for Canadians and our industry. While most people -- excepting vampires -- favour more daylight there are serious issues of concern to the aviation and other industries."

    (The Canadian Press reported this afternoon that Premier Dalton McGuinty says the province doesn't want difficulties with its main trading partner, but there are business, environment and social issues to consider before the province follows suit.

    ( "What are the environmental ups and downs of this? What are the business pros and cons? And then what about life for families? Does it make it more or less difficult?" McGuinty said.

    ( "We're going to have to take a look at it obviously. We're not anxious to have a disconnect between us and our chief trading partner.")

    The Prime Minister's Office was still trying to figure out yesterday which department or minister would be most concerned about the time discrepancy.

    In fact, though many Canadians may think we're overgoverned, the potentially significant matter of who goes along with daylight time -- moving the clock ahead an hour in the spring and back an hour in the fall -- is largely left up to individual provinces, even to local municipalities, mostly on a voluntary basis. Saskatchewan, for instance, has always been a daylight time holdout, as have several communities in British Columbia and northern Quebec.

    While Crispino agrees the move to extend daylight hours could lead to energy savings, his bigger concern is the additional costs for business.

    Gillian Bentley, spokesperson for Calgary-based WestJet airlines, said the time change could be problematic for the carrier, especially for passengers on connecting flights, or if the airline flies into airports with night curfews.

    "Obviously we would have to adjust our sch

  134. grandma's time by rctay · · Score: 1

    I had a grandmother that lived to 96. She refused to set her clocks to DST. She kept, "Gods time". You had to always convert the time in your head when dealing with her. What really worried me is I got a quarter of her genes.

  135. Sydney olympics in 2000 by paylett · · Score: 2, Interesting
    We had a once-off change to daylight savings for the Sydney Olympics in 2000.

    Everyone complained a lot about how inconveniect it was going to be, but everything went smoothly.

    For my part, I was mainly working with Windows boxes. There was a hot-fix from Microsoft that came out some time before to let Windows know what was going on - and not much else needed to be done.

    --

    Believing something doesn't make it true. Not believing something doesn't make it false.

    1. Re:Sydney olympics in 2000 by mjtg · · Score: 1

      And several states in Australia are doing it all again when Melbourne hosts the Commonwealth Games in April 2006.

      Here where I work, I realised the impact that the Sydney 2000 change would have about 3 days before it came into effect. It took four people a total of a couple of hours to patch 50 Windows and Solaris servers. Its no big deal guys.

    2. Re:Sydney olympics in 2000 by Kiz2 · · Score: 1

      if you don't mind chatting about it for an article, I'm curious about how painless it was and whether there were any obstacles (any hardware issues?). I'm working on a story for IDG News. I'm reachable at stacy_cowley@idg.com. thanks!

  136. All that is left? by asoap · · Score: 1
    All that is left is a signoff by President Bush.
    Oh no. I can just hear the lobbies trying to convince the president now.

    "Mr. President, sign this reform for all of the hard working farmers of this great nation. That extra hour a day for two months will surely help them out with growing all of those plants!"

    Then Bush will give a speech about how he's added an extra hour a day of sunlight to the country to help out all of those farmers.

    It's gonna work! Mark my words!

    --
    Treat me like a marketing stat, and I'll treat your movie like a series of ones and zeros
  137. Why don't we just by abaynes · · Score: 1

    set the clock back half an hour--and leave it.

    --
    - A R T
  138. Not a big deal by kieronb · · Score: 1

    In Australia, New South Wales extended daylight savings time for a couple of months in 2000 to accommodate the Sydney Olympics.

    It basically involved a patch to the timezome files of your machine.

    Politicians like to change these things occasionally, and most developers that have to deal with time will have included a configurable setup, because the rules are different from place to place to start with.

  139. how will IT handle the change? by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 1

    the same way IT handled Y2K problem.

    (i) Hire consultants
    (ii) Consultants produce a report essentially saying the whole company will go to pieces unless they hire more consultants to write more reports how to avoid Y2K problem.
    (iii) ...
    (iv) Profits (that is, to Y2K consultants).

  140. This Time Law... by Thunderstruck · · Score: 1

    Can anyone tell me under what Federal authority such a law is passed and enforced by Congress? It seems to me this thing is overbroad and really not within any of Congress's powers. It has no spending clause, it does not limit itself to commerce, and has nothing to do with civil rights...

    Then again, my research lasted about 10 minutes.

    Can anyone help with this?

    --
    Trying to use sarcasm in text-based forums does not work.
    1. Re:This Time Law... by zavyman · · Score: 1

      Weights and measures?

      Clause 5: To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;

      Necessary and proper, and all that.

    2. Re:This Time Law... by Thunderstruck · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's pretty solid ... bummer.

      --
      Trying to use sarcasm in text-based forums does not work.
  141. What corporate interest is benefitting from this? by chihowa · · Score: 1
    So the question becomes:

    Who becomes richer because of this?

    I know I'm cynical, but the fact that this always works out kinda bumms me out...

    --
    If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
  142. Work 8 to 4. by msauve · · Score: 0

    Really, DST is ridiculous, and will be more so if it's made to be in effect the majority of the year. It's a zero sum game - it has no effect on available day/night, and certainly doesn't "save daylight." Businesses should change their hours if they are affected by changing sunrise/sunset times.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  143. Why not have scoool later by Yohahn · · Score: 1


    The PTA worries about kids walking to school in the dark. Small hint: if it's dark when kids are going to school, YOU'RE STARTING IT TOO EARLY.

    I'm tried of the world being run by morning people

  144. Good Christ by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 5, Informative
    ... right... changing the DST will provide you with *more* daylight... it will somehow slow down the earth while the sun is shining, and accelerate it at night... What's the point of all this? No matter how you mess around with the DST, you won't get a single minute of daylight that you didn't have before.

    Wow, it's pedant day on slashdot! The point, Captain Obvious, is to provide the most daylight during waking hours for the average diurnal person.

    1. Re:Good Christ by perelgut · · Score: 1
      Wow, it's pedant day on slashdot! The point, Captain Obvious, is to provide the most daylight during waking hours for the average diurnal person.

      I think that Mr. Underbridge has found a way to create more daylight hours - if he can continue such shining, bright commentary - a new sun is born.

      What difference does my battery-operated clock make for a diurnal person? Wouldn't they continue to wake and sleep at the same time?

      By the way, today was the first that I heard about this move. Did Congress just wake up and go, "let's jerk around the rest of the world and prove we're the biggest bully around?" Shouldn't something like this be discussed and synchronized with trading partners or something?

    2. Re:Good Christ by Dashing+Leech · · Score: 1
      "The point, Captain Obvious, is to provide the most daylight during waking hours for the average diurnal person."

      Hmm. The sun rises here between 6:40 AM and 7:20 AM in November, meaning I don't turn on any lights when I get up in the morning. If DST is extended the sun will now rise between 7:40 AM and 8:20 AM so I will have lights on in the morning. True, in the evening I'll use them less, but these cancel each other out. In the end, no net gain.

      However, this doesn't apply to everyone so it will probably end up saving some energy. But the point is it only works if you take sunlight out of the time people are asleep, which applies less an less in winter months, so there's dimminishing returns as it is pushed further. I wonder if the energy savings is worth the coordination headaches it'll cause.

    3. Re:Good Christ by ILikeRed · · Score: 1

      So you kind of admit the argument is flawed, and then proceed to attack the person pointing that out?

      --
      I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm, and three or more is a congress -J Adams
    4. Re:Good Christ by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
      What difference does my battery-operated clock make for a diurnal person? Wouldn't they continue to wake and sleep at the same time?

      No. They wouldn't. They would get up an hour earlier to go to that job they presumably have. See, if I was on standard time, and it switched to daylight, and I got up at the same time, I'd get to work late. Gifted.

      By the way, today was the first that I heard about this move. Did Congress just wake up and go, "let's jerk around the rest of the world and prove we're the biggest bully around?" Shouldn't something like this be discussed and synchronized with trading partners or something?

      Um, no. US isn't setting policy for the rest of the world. What we do is our business.

    5. Re:Good Christ by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
      However, this doesn't apply to everyone so it will probably end up saving some energy. But the point is it only works if you take sunlight out of the time people are asleep, which applies less an less in winter months, so there's dimminishing returns as it is pushed further. I wonder if the energy savings is worth the coordination headaches it'll cause.

      Oh, yeah, pushing it to Nov is freaking stupid. I was mainly calling the guy on his pedantry of brilliantly pointing out that DST doesn't, technically, save time.

      I think they should start DST in April and end it in March.

    6. Re:Good Christ by CptNerd · · Score: 1
      By the way, today was the first that I heard about this move. Did Congress just wake up and go, "let's jerk around the rest of the world and prove we're the biggest bully around?" Shouldn't something like this be discussed and synchronized with trading partners or something?

      Um, no. US isn't setting policy for the rest of the world. What we do is our business.
      Actually,it will affect securities and futures traders, because the market will open an hour earlier and close an hour earlier than before, for an extra two months a year. International traders will have to make adjustments that they weren't prepared for, and software will have to be modified that wasn't scheduled for (or budgeted for) change.
      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    7. Re:Good Christ by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
      Actually,it will affect securities and futures traders, because the market will open an hour earlier and close an hour earlier than before, for an extra two months a year. International traders will have to make adjustments that they weren't prepared for, and software will have to be modified that wasn't scheduled for (or budgeted for) change.

      I imagine they can deal with it. Personally I think this Nov thing is generally stupid, but I don't see software breakage as a particularly compelling reason to not pursue policy in the US's best interest (assuming it were).

      If the US had to consider every possible ramification of every single policy change, we'd never get anything done. At the end of the day, it is our country - and we have to do what's right for us.

    8. Re:Good Christ by one2go · · Score: 1
      Wow, it's pedant day on slashdot! The point, Captain Obvious, is to provide the most daylight during waking hours for the average diurnal person.

      Isn't every day pedant day?

    9. Re:Good Christ by aberic · · Score: 1

      We already have six timezones in this country, guy.

    10. Re:Good Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Securities and futures traders contribute absolutely nothing worthwhile to society, so it hardly matters if this inconveniences them a little.

    11. Re:Good Christ by Schmelvic · · Score: 1
      Securities and futures traders contribute absolutely nothing worthwhile to society, so it hardly matters if this inconveniences them a little.
      Ask a farmer if a future trader contributes nothing to society. Selling futures for them can stabilize their business plans considerably.
    12. Re:Good Christ by Murasaki+Skies · · Score: 1

      Appedantly.

      --
      Waiiii!!!!!! I have bad karma!
    13. Re:Good Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, this is /. Every day is pedant day.

    14. Re:Good Christ by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      If everyone was using NTP, this wouldn't be a problem.

    15. Re:Good Christ by indifferent+children · · Score: 1
      Isn't every day pedant day?

      Can't be. We change our smoke alarm batteries on Pedant Day, and who can afford that many batteries?

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    16. Re:Good Christ by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

      Who says you put new batteries in each time? You just need to exchange them with another working pair.

    17. Re:Good Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I'm nocturnal, you insensitive clod!

    18. Re:Good Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need more hints from Captain Obvious. DST doesn't provide you with this extra daylight. Waking up earlier does.

  145. Hey, I live in Mexico, you insensitive clod! :( by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And here DST is all screwed up. We'd need a DST from May to September or something. Currently DST forces us to wake up when the sky's all black.

    Why did we do it, you ask? Pressures from the US.
    I doubt Mexicans would want to accept a schedule that only makes things only worse. But as usual... we have to obey the all-powerful US otherwise we suffer the consequences.

    If Bush wants to sign this to save some bills, why doesn't he stop wasting money in IRAQ. Sheesh.

  146. Horrible from a Jewish perspective by thegameiam · · Score: 5, Interesting

    DST is already bad enough from an Orthodox Jewish perspective, because we our holidays and sabbaths start at nightfall, and this makes "night" exceedingly late for much of the year.

    The specific case which shows the problem is the Passover Seder, which has to begin after nightfall, and there's about 2 hours of stuff before eating. Right now, about half the time, Passover falls during ST, and starts at a reasonable hour. With this change, it'll be much harder to keep children up to participate. :(

    -David Barak

    --
    Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise!
    1. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by thegameiam · · Score: 1

      You might find that being polite is a more effective communication approach than being rude.

      Further, may I recommend rechecking your definitions? Neither "brainwash" nor "cult" were the words you were looking for. "Superstition" is loaded and insulting, but not not complete malapropisms like the other two. You'll find that you'll be taken more seriously if you use words correctly.

      Finally, DST is a worthless idea, propped up with erroneous pseudoscience. I wouldn't necessarily care about its inherent worthlessness, however, were it not to impinge upon my ability to pursue happiness.

      --
      Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise!
    2. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by lamasquerade · · Score: 1

      cult
      n. 1.a. A religion or religious sect generally considered to be extremist or false, with its followers often living in an unconventional manner under the guidance of an authoritarian, charismatic leader.

      That's the first definition I get from dictionary.com and it fits - I consider all religions to be completely and obviously false, therefore all religions are cults. Although the secondary part of the definition is optional, a mythical god suffices for the authoritarian, charismatic leader (even if it hasn't shown itself for a few millennia), or a particular rabbi/imam/priest/guru etc. who is leading a particular sect of your chosen cult would fit the bill even moreso.

      So that does it for cult. Yeah it has negative connotations, but rightly so - followers aren't known for their perspicacity.

      Next we come to brainwash. Well what else do you call putting a child through regular rituals when they are too young to understand or argue the basis of those rituals. I don't know if your particular rituals involve the chanting and devoted kneeling, bowing of heads etc. of the Roman Catholic rituals to which I was subjected as a child, but I'm sure they involve similarly baseless affirmations of various beliefs necessary to nurture a future cult member.

      Now I have rechecked my definitions as you have asked and found them sound. I think I used them well within normal usage but that you are more used to other, more revering words being used such as 'religion' and 'ceremony' rather than 'cult' and 'brainwashing ritual' - but then I try to use precise words that reflect the reality of the situation.

      --

      // It had been Fat's delusion for years that he could help people. --Philip K. Dick, Valis

    3. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by pentalive · · Score: 1

      Perhaps if the kids had a nap earlier in the day??

    4. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by thegameiam · · Score: 1

      Well, that's the solution people are stuck with. :/

      If DST was actually worth something scientifically, that would be one thing - but it's been shown that the energy offset you save in the afternoon is paid for by increased numbers of auto accidents in the morning darkness. sigh.

      --
      Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise!
    5. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by thegameiam · · Score: 5, Informative

      The definition says "generally considered"

      you wrote "I consider all religions to be completely and obviously false, therefore all religions are cults."

      The flaw in your reasoning is readily apparent: just because you can't or won't understand something doesn't mean that it's false.

      Point two is the charismatic religious leader: while many Christian and Islamic denominations have charismatic leaders, very few Rabbis are described as charismatic. Further, Rabbi = "teacher" i.e. someone who has studied a lot about Jewish law, ritual, and philosophy. Not an intercessor before God, not someone who is especially holy, or anything of the sort.

      Let's return to the dictionary, shall we?

      charisma 1. A rare personal quality attributed to leaders who arouse fervent popular devotion and enthusiasm.
      2. Personal magnetism or charm: a television news program famed for the charisma of its anchors.
      3. (Christianity). An extraordinary power, such as the ability to perform miracles, granted by the Holy Spirit.

      Clearly, the word "charismatic" is not meant to apply to God.

      Now, "brainwashing"... sheesh... what exactly would you consider the difference between "brainwashing" and "educating"? Whether the subject of the education is one of which you approve, I presume. Feel free to correct me if you have a more precise definition, although it sounds like you're using malapropisms merely to attempt to offend.

      Please, if you're going to play the part of the angry Athiest (doesn't that get old after a while?), there are arguments against various and sundry religious beliefs which don't require torturing the English language. Feel free to try them. I'll assume you've read Russell's Why I am not a Christian? His arguments, while easily refuted, are civil and the model of appropriate use of language and rhetoric.

      Otherwise it's just trolling...

      I find it interesting that your signature is from PKD's Valis - are you at all familiar with his theology?

      --
      Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise!
    6. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by evilviper · · Score: 1
      With this change, it'll be much harder to keep children up to participate. :(

      It's a change of ONE HOUR. I fail to see how that qualifies as "much harder". The kids will be getting up just one single hour earlier.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    7. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by noldrin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I figured it would be appreciated by the Orthodox Jews who don't drive on the sabbath as it would make it easier for them to drive home on friday evenings before nightfall hits.

    8. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DST is already bad enough from an Orthodox Jewish perspective, because we our holidays and sabbaths start at nightfall, and this makes "night" exceedingly late for much of the year

      Well, let me be the first to say, "Who gives a shit".

      Please, feel free to add this to the whole list of complaints that the Jews have against the rest of the planet for not being Jews. Is there anything that isn't "Horrible from a Jewish perspective"? Shock of all shocks, a Jew complaining.

      There is somewhere you can go where your beliefs and customs are accomodated in the fullest. Feel free to exercise your "Right of return", perhaps tomorrow?

      The specific case which shows the problem is the Passover Seder, which has to begin after nightfall

      Hmm, sounds like a side effect of having a system of beliefs that have not evolved since the invention of the clock to me. Boo Hoo.

      With this change, it'll be much harder to keep children up to participate.

      Oh, come on. You can tell your kids how the whole planet has been fucking you over for the past 3000 years, and that is why us stinkin "Gents" still owe you.

      If you want to start a whinefest, try to not start with a set of customs that you participate in of your own free will. You may have noticed that the VAST majority of the planet has never participated in your ancient traditions, yet we don't seem to be getting struck dead.

      Then again, maybe this is YOUR cross to bear for being "God's chosen people".

      Suck it up, biatch.

    9. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by thegameiam · · Score: 1

      It's funny - it would be nice to have the extra hour in the dead of winter (when nightfall is around 4:30), but once we're into spring, it's not as valuable, and it gets less valuable the further we go into the year.

      Oh well - I suspect we can't fight city hall on this one. :(

      --
      Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise!
    10. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by thegameiam · · Score: 1

      Passover in 2002 started at 7:14 (ST) on April 3rd.
      Passover in 2003 started at 8:28 (DST) on April 17th.

      It's about 2 hours from the start of the holiday to the eating part, so it's the difference between eating dinner in the 9 o'clock hour, and eating dinner in the 10 o'clock hour.

      --
      Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise!
    11. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by stinkykitten · · Score: 0
      ...Passover Seder, which has to begin after nightfall,...

      So does this mean that anyone who lives in the many places where day, or night, can last for days and even months cannot be a Jew?

      Religions are so much fun when they have requirements that are or can be technically impossible. But if you don't follow "The word of God" then you're evil and will go to Hell.

    12. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

      Your religion is your own issue, and that's all well and good.

      But to call daylight saving time a "worthless idea"?

      I don't care about the pseudoscience or bizarre ideas of how it will fade the carpets or cause havoc for the cows.

      I care because when I work all day, I get to spend some time in sunlight in the evenings. That's when it's most valuable to me (I'm not a morning person). For that alone, daylight saving is a brilliant idea in my view.

    13. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by Kohath · · Score: 1

      So you're eating, and the clock says a different time.... I guess I don't understand the horror.

    14. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by lamasquerade · · Score: 1
      The definition says "generally considered"

      you wrote "I consider all religions to be completely and obviously false, therefore all religions are cults."

      The flaw in your reasoning is readily apparent: just because you can't or won't understand something doesn't mean that it's false.

      You have a point in that the definition says 'generally considered', although this of course depends on the opinions of the society in which you live. Yes, by this definition, the big religions are not cults as they are not generally considered false in my or your society.

      However the alleged flaw that you point out in my reasoning has nothing to do with whether or not religions are cults. As I have just conceeded, the 'generally considered' element of the definition was my flaw. But you say: I call religions false and hence cults. I come to the conclusion that religions are false because I can't or won't understand religions/your religion, which is bad reasoning, hence my conclusion is invalid and so religions are not cults.

      Now it is obvious here that you have no idea why I have come to the conclusion that religions are false and you are presuming that I don't understand religion because you think that yours is true. Which looks to me like circular reasoning. Suffice to say, this particular point didn't say much, but gave you the opportunity to make a jibe about me criticizing that which I don't understand - I had always thought the religious had a patent on that process (beware, another jibe.)

      Now to the charismatic leader. (Although of course I have conceeded the point about cults, I feel the need to debate this point anyway.) You say that a) most rabbis are not described as charismatic and b) rabbi means teacher. So a rabbi is not the sort to be an authoritarian cult leader.

      As to weather rabbis are frequently described as charismatic, or whether there are some who exert a controlling influence over the thoughts of their congregation I can not say. I'm pretty sure there are more than a few extremist Jewish sects (extremist in the opinions of the majority of Jews I suppose) led by their own extreme rabbis and these could probably fit the bill as far as a cult is concerned.

      Then there is the issue of whether a God can be called charismatic. I think that the first definition you gave there fits the bill entirely: leaders who arouse fervent popular devotion and enthusiasm.

      What is a judeo-christian-islamic god if not this? Yes it does say 'personal quality', but I think that has more to do with syntax than semantics. Whether or not the god is actively appearing to people doesn't matter if it's purported words are being read every day by millions and used as the basis for their lives.

      Then of course after all of this is the second definition for cult: A system or community of religious worship and ritual. (again from dictionary.com) I think that one is pretty hard to argue with.

      Onto brainwaishing - the crux of the matter for me is whether active questioning of the subject matter is encouraged. That is, whether the subject is being taught dogmatically or not. I've never attended a religious class or church where anything is questioned. Indeed questioning is actively discouraged from my experience. You can't call that education and you certainly can call it brainwashing, especially if the subject matter relates to ethics and ideology. When those subjects are being taught (i.e. education) everything is questioned, every idea examined. In a religious setting the very opposite is the norm: ideas and beliefs are presented as facts, to question them - blasphemy. That, to me, is brainwashing.

      Your next point, if I may call it that, is mainly composed of varios jibes. You call me an angry atheist - I assure you I'm not angry and I don't see how anything I have said has implied that I am. To be sure I am an atheist, and I despise religion as I despise any unreasonably held belief. That doesn't make me angry thoug

      --

      // It had been Fat's delusion for years that he could help people. --Philip K. Dick, Valis

    15. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by RSevrinsky · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And that's in the US, where Orthodox Jewish concerns don't really get taken into consideration.

      Here in Israel, the compromise deal reached (finally!) this year on DST was to start on the Friday on or preceding April 1, which nearly always precedes the Seder. Bear in mind that well over 70% of Israeli Jews, regardless of affiliation, have a Seder of some sort. At least the other side of the compromise was reasonable -- we go back to Standard Time on the Saturday night following Rosh HaShana, thereby making Yom Kippur *seem* to end earlier.

      Of course, it's all psychological in the first place...

    16. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by mark-t · · Score: 3, Insightful
      You say questioning is actively discouraged in _YOUR_ experience.

      That's the problem, you see... your experience might just be a bit too limited.

      The authoritative sources of many of the recognized religions in this world that are not considered cults (including Judaism and Christianity, just to name a couple) practically mandate that people think for themselves, to always think clearly and rationally and not act on mere impulse or emotion, and indeed even be prepared to question whether or not something that claims to be from a higher power actually is divinely inspired by rationally and objectively comparing the claims to already known truths. This doesn't seem like brainwashing to me, but if you still think so, that's your right to have a differing opinion.

      Most religions don't claim to make its followers into perfect and infallible people in this life, and I would put it to you that your experience with these religions may not coincide with what I have described above is a result of normal human failings rather than a failure in the actual philosophies that they teach.

    17. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      you wrote "I consider all religions to be completely and obviously false, therefore all religions are cults."

      The flaw in your reasoning is readily apparent: just because you can't or won't understand something doesn't mean that it's false.


      Most religions educate their followers that their own religion is the only true religion and that all the others are false. They have different ways to express how these believers in other gods should be treated, but generally those are not very positive.

      Assuming that those statements are all true, there are only two ways out:

      - all religions are false
      - all religions but one are false.

      As we don't want to discriminate against large groups of inhabitants of the world, the safest bet is that all religions are false.
      Q.E.D.

    18. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by pe1chl · · Score: 2, Interesting

      DST is already bad enough from an Orthodox Jewish perspective, because we our holidays and sabbaths start at nightfall

      High latitudes must be bad from an Orthodox Jewish perspective as well!
      Nightfall in the summer (depending on how you define it) routinely occurs as late as 10PM here. Go further north and night does not fall at all.

    19. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by lamasquerade · · Score: 1
      But no matter how enlightened or progressive the religion or practitioner, if someone is religious then by definition they must believe in a supernatural power.

      Of course I can only speak from my experience - and I am always open to the idea of an argument I haven't heard which may prove me wrong - but as far as I can tell it is impossible to prove the existence of such a supernatural power. Any religious person I have ever spoken to on the matter has ended claiming that 'you have to have faith', which is simply code for: 'I have no reason to believe but I want to so I will.'

      So a summary of my line of reasoning is:
      All religions claim a supernatural power exists (by definition, therefore some forms of buddhism e.g. are not religions by this definition)
      It is impossible to prove the existence of such a supernatural being.
      Any adherent of any religion (by definition again) must believe in the existence of this supernatural being.
      Therefore any adherent of any religion must not have seriously examined that particular and intrinsic tenet of their religion.

      That is of course a short summary but you can see the essence of it. I really can't see how a religion can foster anything but dogmatism, and from all the religious people I have met, the effects of religion in politcs, opinion pieces written by religious people in the paper, statements by church leaders or imams or rabbis or gurus - from all of this that I have experienced nothing has even hinted that religion might be a force for reason or rationalism.

      Yes there are people who claim to be religious and who are intelligent and nobel prize winners and all the rest. But equally there are catholics who use birth control. What I mean by this is that just because someone says he/she is a religious practitioner doesn't mean they actually know half the tenets of their religion - usually it's just because they were born into it and are afraid of examining it.

      But in my mind, there can be no doubt that a religious person has rejected reason.

      --

      // It had been Fat's delusion for years that he could help people. --Philip K. Dick, Valis

    20. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      As to weather rabbis are frequently described as charismatic, or whether there are some who exert a controlling influence over the thoughts of their congregation I can not say. I'm pretty sure there are more than a few extremist Jewish sects...

      Onto brainwaishing - the crux of the matter for me is whether active questioning of the subject matter is encouraged. That is, whether the subject is being taught dogmatically or not. I've never attended a religious class or church where anything is questioned. Indeed questioning is actively discouraged from my experience.


      And you're upset that you were accused of being unable or unwilling to understand something?

      Many important scientific discoveries have been made by men who were seeking to better understand God's creation.

      "I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use." - Galileo Galilei

      "Gravity explains the motions of the planets, but it cannot explain who set the planets in motion. God governs all things and knows all that is or can be done." - Sir Isaac Newton

      "No one can read the Gospels without feeling the actual presence of Jesus. His personality pulsates in every word. No myth is filled with such life." - Albert Einstein

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    21. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Remind me again why anyone should give a fuck what any religious person thinks?

      Because "anyone" includes religious people.

      If it makes you feel better, I don't respect your beliefs either. :-)

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    22. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, these are people who think that if there was a god, he would care what meat they ate. Catholics seem to still believe in intercession by saints. So, this omnipotent God needs to be reminded to help people? And don't get me started on 'holy' bread - at what point in the digestive system does it stop being holy? The stomach? The rectum? If it never does, that's a lot of holy shit you have to look after.

      It scares me that people stupid enough to be able to blind themselves to the inconsistencies and idiocy of religion just because it makes them feel better have any influence at all on government policy.

    23. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by Geek+Yid · · Score: 1

      You are absolutely correct. Moving both Passover and Sukkot into 100% without exception DST would be incredibly detrimental to religious Jews.

      Children would still have to wake up and go to school as per normal, so would just be up longer. Have the kids take a nap, you say? Riiiiight. Lets just add putting kids to bed during bright daylight and then waking them back up to the things parents have to do while running around like chickens with their heads cut off making last-minute preparations for an incoming Yom Tov (holiday for you non-Yid Slashdotters).

      Worse -- especially at Passover -- would be the splitting of families we now see whenever Passover comes during DST. Every less observant member of the family wants to start before Halacha (Jewish Law) allows, since -- as many of my own family have expressed -- 'It's late enough already, and I/we want to get done and go home.' This creates fractures within Jewish families.

      Hey, wait a minute! Someone tell George that this whole thing is against family values! Yeah, like that'll actually work!

    24. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      All Buddhism defines a supernatural power, the big difference is that the supernatural power is everything, including us.

      And...wow. You've got some issues, your series of posts are the most religious that I've ever seen on /.. Since you obviously have no conclusive proof that no supernatural power exists, then you take it on faith that no supernatural power does exist. But yet you vehemently deny your religious nature.

      Just because you believe something contrary to what you call "religion" doesn't mean that you don't believe.

      Your four part line of reasoning assumes that people can only believe what they can prove. You fail to take into account that in many cases it is necessary or desireable to believe in something that hasn't been proven (or may not ever be proved), e.g. dark matter.

      I believe the sun will come up tomorrow, that Yosemite won't finally blow up (again) and cover the breadbasket of the world in meters of ash, that there is a reason to act today as if tomorrow will happen. I have absolutely no proof that tomorrow will happen and, indeed, it is impossible to prove that it will; yet my day to day actions are wholly governed by that irrational belief. Do you think that the actions I take that are caused by my belief (earning money instead of goofing off all day, not eating fifty candy bars, and generally living nicely) are sad devotions?

      Yes, I do have a reasonable expectation that the sun will come up tomorrow because, after all, it came up today and for every single day before that in which I have lived. Yet a more religious person than I would argue that "the supernatural force" (actually all the religious people I know would just say God) has been active in our creation, i.e. we were created, and it is reasonable to believe that "the supernatural force" could be active again or is active now, unknown to us mere mortals.

      Personally, I believe that we exist in a Universe that is carefully designed to support life because we exist in a Universe that was carefully designed to support life. That design may not have been intelligently guided, and may be the product of billions of iterations before, after, and during all unknown to us; but it's a delicate and intricate design nonetheless.

    25. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by thegameiam · · Score: 1
      Most religions educate their followers that their own religion is the only true religion and that all the others are false. They have different ways to express how these believers in other gods should be treated, but generally those are not very positive.


      Study some more religion. The plurality of the world's religious people are either Hindu or Buddhist, and neither of those belief systems make any claim toward exclusivity.

      Judaism, which was of course the subject of this thread, likewise makes no claim on being the only true religion. It does make the claim of being the only true and correct religion for Jews, but that's a horse of a different colour, and thus does not fit into your argument.

      Continuing onward, after Vatican II, the Catholic Church, representing the plurality (if not outright majority) of the world's Christians) declared that (paraphrased) non-Christians who are decent people have a place in heaven - thus their beliefs are not entirely false.

      Assuming that those statements are all true, there are only two ways out:

      - all religions are false
      - all religions but one are false.

      As we don't want to discriminate against large groups of inhabitants of the world, the safest bet is that all religions are false.
      Q.E.D.


      Well, the premeses weren't so solid, so I can forgive the mistaken conclusions. However, even if your premeses had been correct, your conclusion would not have been: you haven't differentiated between the concept of having a religion and the particular theology of the religion.

      Yehudah Ha-Levi used something similar to your argument in his seminal work Kuzari, where a king listed to Jewish, Christian, and Muslim scholars, and concluded by what amounted to set theory that only Judaism could be true.

      The argument you made could be restated thus:

      Most people believe the value of pi to be between 3 and 4, and believe that there is only one value of pi, and that all other values are wrong.
      Because they cannot agree on the value of pi, there must not be a value.

      "QED" is a bit overstated for a non-proof: what exactly was demonstrandum here?

      -David
      --
      Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise!
    26. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by thegameiam · · Score: 1

      That's actually an interesting problem: in short, the solution ends up as "use the calculations from the nearest place which has nightfall." If one is in orbit or something like that, the answer ends up being "use Jerusalem time"

      The only time of year when the problem is acutely felt is Passover, due to the particular structure of the Seder. For the rest of the year, people's internal clocks are reasonably well-set and used to it.

      --
      Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise!
    27. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by thegameiam · · Score: 1

      Even if we went to DST year-round (if it's good for these months, it should be good for those, right?), that would be better than the back-and-forth we have now. At least that way, people's internal clocks would match what the one on the wall said...

      --
      Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise!
    28. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by thegameiam · · Score: 1

      Why not just go in to work earlier if you want daylight after work?

      I called it worthless because much garbage science is used to justify it. The biggest reason not to use DST is the increase in auto accidents in the morning.

      --
      Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise!
    29. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by mikaelhg · · Score: 1

      "No one can read the Gospels without feeling the actual presence of Jesus. His personality pulsates in every word. No myth is filled with such life."

      "It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it." [Albert Einstein, 1954, from Albert Einstein: The Human Side, edited by Helen Dukas and Banesh Hoffman, Princeton University Press]

    30. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by kenp2002 · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked wasn't night-time more or less the time after sunset? Why would the wall-clock time even factor into this? The only problem I would see with this (Here in MN) for Jews would be that sunset can be as late as 9:30pm and many kids might already be in bed before there is an opportunity to feed the lil runts. I say ignore the wall clock and use the sun-rise, sun-set clock.

      --
      -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
    31. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by thegameiam · · Score: 1

      As to weather [sic] rabbis are frequently described as charismatic, or whether there are some who exert a controlling influence over the thoughts of their congregation I can not say. I'm pretty sure there are more than a few extremist Jewish sects (extremist in the opinions of the majority of Jews I suppose) led by their own extreme rabbis and these could probably fit the bill as far as a cult is concerned.

      So you admit to speculating with no actual knowledge of the situation? You're "pretty sure"? "probably"? That's a pretty low proof standard for libeling the belief system of a large number of people, no?

      What is a judeo-christian-islamic god if not this? Yes it does say 'personal quality', but I think that has more to do with syntax than semantics. Whether or not the god is actively appearing to people doesn't matter if it's purported words are being read every day by millions and used as the basis for their lives.

      You are mistaken: the "personal quality" is not just syntax. There is a reason that "charismatic" is not used to describe the Abrahamic God. "Charisma" is a human attribute, and while many use antropomorhpisms when discussing God, those are at most considered metaphorical, and thus don't fit the bill for the requirement of "cult."

      Come on - if you actually want to discuss your lack of belief, that's fine. We can disagree all we want, but there's no reason not to be civil.

      Onto brainwaishing - the crux of the matter for me is whether active questioning of the subject matter is encouraged. That is, whether the subject is being taught dogmatically or not. I've never attended a religious class or church where anything is questioned. Indeed questioning is actively discouraged from my experience. You can't call that education and you certainly can call it brainwashing, especially if the subject matter relates to ethics and ideology. When those subjects are being taught (i.e. education) everything is questioned, every idea examined. In a religious setting the very opposite is the norm: ideas and beliefs are presented as facts, to question them - blasphemy. That, to me, is brainwashing.

      So exactly which seminary did you attend? I can tell you conclusively that no Jewish seminary or instructional method forbids questions. In fact, at the Seder which started this conversation, there is even a section called "the Four Questions" which was included to forstall the unlikely possibility that there not be any questions asked over the course of the night.

      The entire Talmud, which is the crux of Jewish Law, is recordings of the great Rabbis of a 400 year period arguing with each other, and questioning all of the prior legal and Biblical texts.

      Your statement shows a tremendous ignorance of what you speak. In the words of Hillel the Elder, "Go and learn."

      My response to that is that I neither try to offend nor shirk from it. I say precisely what I think and use the words which reflect it.

      I assume by this that you are young. As you age, you'll learn the value of tact, which is the art of choosing words carefully. As an example of tact, try this on for size:

      Here's your original comment:

      What a shame you'll find it harder to brainwash your youngsters. If you choose to base your life on a bunch of ancient superstitious rituals then you can hardly complain about the modern world not working around them as it progresses.

      Here's a tactfully redacted version:

      I don't have much sympathy for religious views with regard to public policy. If you choose to be religious, you can hardly complain about the modern world not accomodating you as it progresses

      Now, both of those express pretty much the same actual content. One is

      --
      Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise!
    32. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by thegameiam · · Score: 1

      Well, right. :)

      The problem is that the rest of the world uses the wall clock, and one has to go to work, school, etc on that schedule. So the adjustment from the rest-of-the-world clock to the sunrise-sunset clock is exceedingly jarring by DST.

      -David

      --
      Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise!
    33. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by repvik · · Score: 1

      I'm a bit south of the polar circle, and nightfall here in the middle of the summer is around 2am, with the sun rising again less than two hours later. We don't have much night around here in the summer ;-)

    34. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by mark-t · · Score: 1
      Consider for a moment of the possibility of a supernatural power... in particular an omnipotent one, much like the Judaochristian god. Indeed, Einstein himself once said that the beginning of understanding something new does not begin with just the facts, since that would not permit us to make any new discoveries, but with our imagination. So let us suspend our disbelief for a moment to better comprehend the nature of God.

      This being is not constrained by the parameters of reality as known to exist, indeed, this being would have actually authored reality itself. In essence, this God is not "real", per se, but "superreal". Absolutely nothing that could ever begin to operate within the confines of reality could begin to effectively describe this God as he happens to actually be. Indeed, any "proof" that such a God doesn't exist which actually doesn't contain any known logical fallacies could very likely actually be true, in spite of the existence of such a being -- that is to say, that the proof would have inherently made assumptions about the nature of God that doesn't necessarily apply to the supereal being whose "nature" would inevitably defy all attempts at rational comprehension within the confines of reality. Conversely, any "proof" of the existence of such a being would similarly be inherently flawed, since the whole of the cosmos across all of time does not contain enough information to describe such a proof.

      So all of the phenomenon which could very well be miracles would of course naturally have a physical explanation that fits within known physical laws because the physical laws are nothing else but our own interpretation of the operation of the universe, which supposedly this omnipotent god created in the first place. It's not even that God chooses to operate within the limitations of physical laws so much as the premise that the physical laws as we understand them are nothing more than the manifestation of the supreme being's will. The fact that they do not change over time may be nothing more than the result of a decision that he may have made to not change his mind about things. Indeed, such a characteristic is actually directly attributed to God in Jewish scripture, where God claims to be unchanging, for all time.

      In this light, it's actually completely rational to believe in God (in spite of the absence of proof), and in fact to a person that does believe in God, it is the people that do not believe in God that appear to have rejected reason. So I guess that makes us equal.

      I confess I would actually be suprised if you don't respond to this in what will ultimately only show itself to be a vain attempt to rationalize your view.

    35. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Hmm, interesting. Alright, bad example; try this one:

      "The atmosphere in which we live swarms with the germs of those microscopic creatures, which are always ready to multiply in dead matter wherever it presents itself, and thus to fulfill the mission of destruction which is correlative to their life. And if God had not so arranged things that, under normal conditions of life and health, the laws governing the changes in tissues and fluids of animal's bodies did not impede the proliferation of these microscopic creatures, we should always be vulnerable to their inroads." - Louis Pasteur

      Reference cited for this quote is:
      Cuny, H. Louis Pasteur, The Man and His Theories. New York: Paul S. Eriksson, Inc., 1966.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    36. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by lamasquerade · · Score: 1
      If you don't believe in a supernatural force of some sort you are not religious - that can not be disputed. Trying to label me religious because I am vehemently atheist is a contradiction. You can say, if you wish, that my atheism is analagous to the reasoning behind religion, which seems to be what you are saying, but no god = no religion, at least in the most widely accepted form of the definiton. You can broaden religion to include me if you wish, but then politics, sport and just about anything else can become religion as well.

      As for your actual point: I simply try to be as rational as I can. I look at a belief I have and if it has no basis I should throw it away. Yes I do not think any god exists, because there has been no evidence for it that I have seen. That's it - a very simple bit of logic. True, it is impossible to prove the absence of something, but if you then believe that everything that can not be disproven exists then you have Santa Clause and the Tooth Fairy as well. Again that's very simple logic - you can not disprove the existence of Santa Clause in exactly the same way you can not disprove the existence of a god - at least any of the gods in which the major religions believe, as they yield no testable hypotheses.

      That is the essence of what I'm saying - if your theory yields nothing to test then sure, it can't be disproven. But equally it can not be proven. So it yields nothing to a person intent on using reason to shape his/her views. The sun rising tomorrow, inductive logic yields the hypothesis, you can test it tomorrow! It's a great hypothesis, readily testable and based on some good induction. The same with your volcano, you test the hypothesis that it won't explode again every day. If it ever does, theory is proven false, find a new one. That's the scientific method.

      Dark matter is a different matter (ha ha). I am no physicist (IANAP) but from what I understand it is a theory developed from observation. That is, a theory of the existence of something which would cause certain observed phenomena. Sounds a lot like religion eh? But the crucial difference: the scientific theory of dark matter yields some testable predictions - if it did not, as religion does not, then it would be a pointless excersise.

      So there it is - give me a religion which yields testable predictions, test them, and if they come out correct then hallelujah I'm a believer. The fact is no major religion yields such predictions. So anyone who believes does so for one reason and one only, because they want to. I find that pointless, I don't want to believe something just because it makes me feel better, or less afraid or part of something or any of the myriad other reasons people believe it gods. I want my beliefs to be founded on solid reasoning and evidence.

      --

      // It had been Fat's delusion for years that he could help people. --Philip K. Dick, Valis

    37. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by lamasquerade · · Score: 1
      Okay, I capitulate on all matters except your post script. Yes, I don't know much about the Jewish faith and how it is taught. If it is as you say then it sounds better that I had concieved. I don't know how such enlightened teaching can yield the ultra-orthadox that we see on the TV so often these days, but perhaps the reverence for learning and questioning is not equally shared by all sects.

      As for your rephasing of my origonal post, yes it reads much better, I'll try to be more tactful in the future.

      Finally the post script: I am aware that absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. However, and I have just discussed this more lengthily on two previous posts on this thread, if a theory yields no testable predictions then it yields nothing. If one requires no evidence to accept something then one accepts everything. You were told that your particular god exists and all the lore that goes with it because you were born to people who had those beliefs. My parents had others. Some other guy has Muslim parents and another has Hindu. The point being that each of us is presented with a theory (of religion) with equal amounts of evidence (none) and if we accept these theories we all come to different conclusions on the same matter. This is not a rigorous way of thinking that comes to four different conclusions on the same matter not based on different evidence, but based on different untested theories.

      So yes, I do not believe a god exists as I have not been presented a credible theory that says one does. I don't believe in the Tooth Fairy for the same reason (but don't get into such debates on this matter for some reason). I don't believe that the Earth will explode tomorrow - same again. There are infinite things that I don't believe because I havent been offered a credible theory. There are finite things I do believe because I have been offered one. You can phrase any of the infinite things I don't believe in as a theory of its own and call it a belief (e.g. you believe god doesn't exist - no, I do not believe god does exist) but that doesn't make it religious.

      --

      // It had been Fat's delusion for years that he could help people. --Philip K. Dick, Valis

    38. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by tootlemonde · · Score: 1

      The biggest reason not to use DST is the increase in auto accidents in the morning.

      The balance of evidence appears to be that DST results in a decrease in auto accidents and pedestrian fatalities and a reduction in violent crime.

      This testimony from the U.S. Department of Transport before the U.S. House Science Committee says:

      With respect to traffic fatalities, we were able to identify a 0.7 percent reduction due to daylight saving time in March and April 1974 compared to the comparable months in 1973 when we were under standard time. At the time, DOT analysts believed that these estimates were conservative and that their calculations understated the real reduction due to daylight saving time, which they judged to be on the order of 1.5 percent to 2 percent.

      With respect to the incidence of crime, study of daylight saving time impacts on the incidence of crime revealed reductions in violent crimes of 10 to 13 percent in Washington, D.C. throughout a 3-year period.

      This study from Rutgers University argues that

      Results show that a switch to full year daylight saving time would reduce pedestrian fatalities by 343 over the 1998-1999 period, or by 13 percent of all pedestrian fatalities in the 5 AM to 10 AM and in the 4 PM to 9 PM time periods examined in this research. Motor vehicle occupant fatalities would be reduced by 390, or 3 percent during the same time periods. In metropolitan areas, full year daylight saving time would reduce pedestrian fatalities by 255 in the 1998-1999 period, or by 12 percent, and would reduce pedestrian fatalities in non-metropolitan areas by 81 or 17 percent.

      The reasoning is that the extra daylight in the working day increases visibility and thereby reduces accidents. Fewer people are also out after dark when they are more likely to be a victim of crime.

      There are studies that show some increase in motor accidents during certain periods but this increase is more than balanced out by the decrease in other periods.

      Trying to correlate accidents with daylight savings time is a complicated statistical exercise but, at best, the evidence for both sides of the question is inconclusive. The result is that, contrary to your statement, there is no strong case against DST out of concern for traffic fatalities.

    39. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by mark-t · · Score: 1
      I don't want to believe something just because it makes me feel better...
      And yet, ironically, you do exactly that:

      I want my beliefs to be founded on solid reasoning and evidence.
      After all, solid reasoning and evidence make you feel better about believing something, don't they?
    40. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by 5pp000 · · Score: 1
      I consider all religions to be completely and obviously false, therefore all religions are cults.

      Yes. But the same goes for atheism :)

      --
      Your god may be dead, but mine aren't!
    41. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, outlawing religion would allow mankind to make a Great Leap Forward. In its place, our leaders should propose a series of Five Year Plans to further benefit the social order.

    42. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by Maow · · Score: 0
      ...bad enough from ... Jewish perspective, because we our holidays and sabbaths start at nightfall, and this makes "night" exceedingly late for much of the year.

      The specific case which shows the problem is the Passover Seder, which has to begin after nightfall, and there's about 2 hours of stuff before eating.

      Worst. Excuse. Ever.

    43. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by moz25 · · Score: 1

      You make an interesting argument because you're taking the "if you cannot disprove it, it must be true" fallacy to a new height by turning it into "even if you can disprove it, it's still true". You are glancing over two problem issues: one is that you argue that it can be reasonable to believe in any number of entities or claims, as long as you can trace it to something that exists outside of our reality.

      Second, the existence or non-existence of a supernatural entity (or entities) is often closely coupled to the validity of religion. True, if the religion is valid, then the deity exists. However, the converse is not true: if a supernatural creating force exists, it is still perfectly valid to reject all religions as bogus.

      Thus, the people who believe in "God" actually believe in their religious doctrine, which conveniently uses forces outside the scope of reality or logic to base its authority on. In fact, I hypothesize that organized religion depends on their deity not existing and not interfering with their business.

    44. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by mark-t · · Score: 1
      You make an interesting argument because you're taking the "if you cannot disprove it, it must be true" fallacy to a new height by turning it into "even if you can disprove it, it's still true".
      Actually, I'm not saying that if you can disprove it's still true, I'm saying that even if you can disprove it, it still _MAY_ be true, but that's not because the proof itself is flawed. In fact, if God is in fact superreal, then no smaller and humanly disprovable God actually exists. So the proof is correct in that the God it is describing doesn't actually exist anywhere in the universe.
      if a supernatural creating force exists, it is still perfectly valid to reject all religions as bogus.
      Only if one believes that no religion actually worships the actually existing supernatural being.

      While my description of said being makes it utterly impossible to comprehend that beings nature, it does not preclude the ability for that being to have a rapport with human beings by that being's choosing. If that is possible, then it is reasonable to conclude that a religion which advocates the premise that an individual can have a relationship with this supreme being is most likely a correct one, or at least as close to correct as may be accomplishable by human beings. Again, however, this is assuming that the being transcends reality in the first place. Presumably, what is as close to being correct as is humanly accomlishable will be acceptable to said supreme being. If not, then it becomes both valid _and_ true to assert that all existing (organized) religions are bogus.

    45. Re:Horrible from a Jewish perspective by moz25 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm not saying that if you can disprove it's still true, I'm saying that even if you can disprove it, it still _MAY_ be true, ...

      Correct, but in your argumentation, the jump from "may be true" to "is most likely true" is a very small one. I find that many people overlook this gap too easily. My argument is that a whole range of other things may then be true as well and on that basis deserve equal attention. Yet in the whole realm of possibilities, certain ones are picked and others discarded... but without mention or reason.

      Only if one believes that no religion actually worships the actually existing supernatural being.

      Well, my phrasing was a little off. My point was (is) that even if we can accept that one or more sentient supernatural beings exist, then that in itself is not enough proof that a particular religion or religious interpretation is the correct one. The number of different interpretations is an indication that such beings do not favor giving much-needed feedback to their followers.

      One interesting assumption is that this being actually desires worship. It is equally reasonable (maybe more reasonable) that such a hypothetical being does not care about our opinions and thus does not require worship. Religions make strong claims about their deity's intentions, yet we can reasonably assume to know almost nothing about the way it thinks or operates. Thus strong claims carry the strong risk of being false. I find it reasonable to question the reasoning of people who do claim to know with certainty what this being wants from us.

      In my view, worship satisfies a need in humans, not in any supernatural entity... and thus a religion can be entirely succesful and even helpful even in the absence of its deity. Would there be a point in worshipping a deity that does not consider us the most special beings alive? People require from this deity that we are special and central to divine plans. If not, the deity can just bugger off apparently.

      that a religion which advocates the premise that an individual can have a relationship with this supreme being is most likely a correct one, ...

      Even so, that still doesn't help much because you can base the entire spectrum of opinions and interpretation on religions that advocate such a premise. Also, truth by association is rather weak and you'd most likely not accept the invalidation an entire religion on the basis of being able to disprove a few of its assertions.

      In that light, the religion that is most likely correct is the Raelian religion (www.rael.org) as it claims that humans were created by aliens. That fits quite nicely with the many UFO sightings, some by high-ranking and trusted military officials. In fact, they show how the bible supports their points because it speaks of Elohim, which - in its original language - can be both singular and plural. Thus, since the Realian religion advocates alien involvement, UFO sightings must be taken as proof for the truth of that religion.

  147. Blame Bill by darkonc · · Score: 1
    (This is slashdot, after all). With the millions of people who haven't updated from the (now unsupported) Windwos 95 and 98, this is just going to be one more source of confuseion, Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt.. First we'll have to change our clocks, on the 'wrong' dates, then we'll have to re-adjust on the 'old' dates -- either that, or update to a version of Windows that still has support and will, thus, get the appropriate updates to their timezone tables.

    All of this just to keep Microsoft happy.

    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  148. Get rid of it completely! by slashname3 · · Score: 1

    Don't just change it, get rid of it! If it is beneficial for people to start work an hour earlier or later then change the start time to 7 or 9am, don't change the clocks. Who said people have to start work at 8am?

    Seriously, DST is of no use anymore.

  149. DST by sydsavage · · Score: 1

    I live in Arizona, you insensitive clod!

    1. Re:DST by zettabyte · · Score: 1
      [snip]It's much easier than setting all my watches and clocks all the time.[/snip]

      Yeah, it's murder changing my clocks twice a year. :-)

      Seriously, though. I'm guessing you're in Europe as L.A. is 10 hours back for you. Which probably means you're only an hour or two off of UTC (a guess). I honestly believe it'd be easier for me to change my clocks twice a year versus having to subtract 6 or 7 hours from the apparent time with each look at the clock. I'm sure there's a brain-guru out there who could calculate the amount a brain power for both approaches. My uneducated guess would be that my way is easier. And I'm all about saving the clock cycles.

  150. Re:Shouldn't most time critical IT applications .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless your system is completely braindead, it's already running UTC or similar internally, and it just _displays_ the local time courtesy of the rules in /etc/localtime.

    In other words, if the rules change, then that file has to be updated everywhere. I see lots of pain on the horizon for sysadmins across the country.

  151. Not a special interest by droopycom · · Score: 1

    I agree this is kind of ridiculous but so is you calling this a special interest.

    This is about public safety (a rather public interest I dare say), not about the special interest of Firemen. They're not saying that it will cost them more money, but that it will cost more lives.

    But this is ridiculous because I never heard of this campaign anyway...

  152. why not 12 months DST? by houghi · · Score: 1

    Why not have the DST the whole year around if it is such a great idea? You can then adjust workinghours accordingly.

    In Belgium a lot of people working for city or state will work different hours (early in the morning till about 14:00) so they do not have to work in the hotest part of the day. This saves on airco and gives the people almost half a day to enjoy the sun.

    I am sure that such a thing can be done with a lot of jobs. Coding is just one of them. I am sure that a programmer could be more interested in working different hours so he does not have to go through rushhour and even could use public transport easier, because he can sit.

    When such a thing is much more widespread, the moment when it is midday and time for lunch will be different from person to person.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  153. I think Canada should follow Saskatchewan's lead by WebCowboy · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...and abolish DST altogehter. For much of Canada DST makes no sense anyways--except perhaps in the most souther parts of the country like Windsor. Why do Canadians have to "save daylight" in the summer? WE HAVE SO DAMN MUCH OF IT ALREADY!

    I don't live all that far north--maybe around 300km north of the 49th parallel. Even after you set your clock ahead the sun rises before 7AM--right now it rises here before 6AM. In Saskatoon (they do not change their clocks) it'll get light at 5AM...in either case I'll still be asleep for another 30-90 minutes so I'm not going to care.

    Where DST REALLY peeves me off is at bedtime. I have to rise by 7AM so I like to be in bed by 11PM...but it's DAYLIGHT SAVINGS TIME so its still F'in light outside! Let it get dark before 11PM please--thanks but I don't need any more day--it is long enough. A lot of people in fairly norhtern cities like Edmonton will thank you--and people in Whitehorse and Yellowknife won't even notice the difference since the sun won't set again for another few weeks anyways.

    So here is what I think Canada should do: Instead of all the expense and confusion around changing DST, or the similar confusion around keeping it the way we have it when the US will be different, we should just go to standard time and STAY there at the point when the US changed their DST. Sure we will still be different from the US, but it'll be the least painful solution because:

    * Even though we'll be out of sync with the US we won't have people getting confused when the US TV programmes remind people to change the clock at a different time than Canadians would have to.

    * There is data suggesting that the loss of sleep on the first Sunday of April due to DST is responsible for increasing the number of injury and fatality accidents on the following Monday. Abolishing DST would eliminate that risk.

    * Since there are already parts of the world that do not do DST all current electronics and computers support NOT adjusting the clocks. Changing DST would be expensive because all those systems would need to change too.

    * It'll finally be dark enough to fall asleep at night in the summer!

    I've always thought that DST was backwards anyways--if we moved ahead for the winter then it wouldn't be pitch black by dinner time--it would be totally dark at 7PM instead of 6. I dunno...the whole concept of DST doesn't seem worth it at all to me anyways.

  154. do some work by dark+grep · · Score: 1

    "With many IT applications relying on accurate time information and many having automatic adjustments for DST, how will the IT world handle this change?" I guess slack arse programmers and sysadmins will just have to do some work for a change.

  155. Re:Typical governmental by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

    You ask where the logic is in that. It's Congress, they don't need logic for anything they do, as long as they get re-elected again.

  156. Easily by cortana · · Score: 1
    "... how will the IT world handle this change?"
    export TZ="EST+5EDT+1,M4.1.0/2,M11.5.0/2

    (Adjust for CST, PST, whatever). Next, please!
    1. Re:Easily by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      That is only for archaic systems.

      Systems that had their timezone handling updated in the past decade use files in a zoneinfo directory, where the change can be made ahead of time and the old convention will be remembered. So, filedates that are valid now will remain valid after the change.

    2. Re:Easily by cortana · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I know this. But the zoneinfo files aren't going to magically change themselves, are they? ;)

      I wonder how this works on Windows...

    3. Re:Easily by Corydon76 · · Score: 1
      No, but the zoneinfo files are remarkably simple. I could probably change all timezones that are affected by the US change in DST in an afternoon (the majority of which will simply be coding a dump and undump script for the zoneinfo files). Then it's just a matter of copying the files around to all the deployed machines we maintain.

      See tzfile(5) for the format. It's really dead-simple.

  157. it's called UTC now by Wolfier · · Score: 1

    Not that it's any different from GMT...

    1. Re:it's called UTC now by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Funny, this web site still defines it as GMT (which is the same thing as Zulu, UT, UTC, or WET). Of course, that is probably a British site... bloody Brits with their antiquated way of doing things!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  158. Indiana by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A few years ago my family moved from the East Coast to Northern Indiana. One of the changes we had to get used to was the removal of DST. We found that change quite refreshing. In Indiana, instead of having to change their clocks the only thing everybody had to do was change their schedules. You either went to school or work a half-hour earlier or later. No problems with a time change. No problems losing an hour.

    Another cool thing about the no-time change in that area was the tv reception. The variety of major news channels (CBS, NBC, ABC, etc.) came from two areas. Some stations we got out of Indianapolis (Eastern Standard Time) while others out of Chicago (Central Standard Time). If you had two shows you wanted to watch that came on at the same time on different networks all you had to do was watch one show and then flip to the other show. It was also nice watching Letterman at 10pm.

    Now, I'm out of Indiana and have to readjust to the timezone change. Hearing about this proposal makes me glad I didn't vote for Bush.

    1. Re:Indiana by wombert · · Score: 1

      Whaaa? I didn't see anything in the article that indicated this was Bush's idea, or even that he was planning to sign off on it.

      You may have read too much into the /. summary...

      --
      Did I say overlords? I meant protectors.
    2. Re:Indiana by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry about that. I think that's a problem a lot of us these days. You see/hear 15 seconds of a story or somebody's opinion on the story and think you have it all figured out.

    3. Re:Indiana by Elf-friend · · Score: 1
      We are shifting our schedule so that we have more daylight during the majority of people's waking hours.
      Living in Vermont (which has DST), I can say that the problem is that this really only works from May-July. In April, and from August to October, "daylight savings" just means it's now dark when you get up instead of in the evening. You still use those same resources, you just use them in the morning instead of at night.

      This will only be aggrivated by extending DST. In November, it won't be light until well after people are at work, so the resources we aren't using in the evening, will just be being used by business instead. In adition, some of the worst consumers of power are things like street lighting that are totally unaffected by DST, as they are on whenever it's dark. Plus, around here, March and November are so grey and rainy/snowy that it might as well be dark all day half the time, as far as lighting use is concerned. As it is, we dread the start of DST, and are really itching for it to be over with by late August.

      Also, as the article noted, this means children will be walking to school in the dark, a major problem in the northeast (and, I imagine, the midwest and northern plains as well), where the winters are so harsh. It can be awfully cold here before the sun comes up, not to mention the danger from cars and snowplows. This will likely require commiting more resources to make sure they reach the school in safety (such as bus use even in village areas, or more children being driven to work).

      Lastly, the whole system is discriminatory towards people who work nights and towards "morning people." A lot of people have their morale and work ethic deeply affected by having get up and go to work in the dark. I would love to see a study that examines just how much better people perfom when they don't have to get up well before the sun.

      On the whole, having seen it in use my whole life, I see extending DST as having little, if any, real world net benefit (and am sceptical about any gross benefit). In fact, I am very concerned about the negative impact it will have in many spheres (not just in computing, which I can deal with).

      PS: For the record, I am an economic moderate-conseravtive (less ultra- than I once was), and and strong social conservative (yet rather libertarian about it). No sissy liberal here. ;-)

  159. This is not hard to do by glowworm · · Score: 1

    During the Sydney Olympics daylight savings time was brought forward quite a few months. Microsoft came out with a special time-zone patch, Novell was easy to change and I just created a special time-zone string for Linux.

    The changes were minor and didn't impact on anything serious (my watch didn't auto-change, so I did it manually)

    I wish they had have left the change in place, the extra months of daylight were great.

    --
    Orationem pulchram non habens, scribo ista linea in lingua Latina
  160. Australia already did this... by AngryElmo · · Score: 2, Informative

    In 2000 for the Sydney Olympics. Start of DST was moved forward about a month. No big deal computer wise - just a few registry tweaks (windows) and manual editing on Netware and Unix. Repeat - no-one reported any major issues - the world still turned.

    1. Re:Australia already did this... by PigIronBob · · Score: 1

      Except for us Queenslanders, we won't have our curtains fading because of you, you, you..., don't you worry about that.... "and his ghost can be heard as you past down by that...., brown paper bag?"

      --
      You never catch me alive
    2. Re:Australia already did this... by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      Europe changed DST handling in 1996. About the only OS giving problems was Windows 95. It does not understand about different DST conventions in different years, and worst: M$ did not know about that change and coded the old convention in Windows 95, released the august before. At that time the change was already widely publicized.

      Linux distributions with modern Posix timezone handling made the change without manual intervention, as their tables were already updated before it actually happened.

  161. Dr. Gene Ray says that DST singularity stupid by brsmith4 · · Score: 1

    DST and the 24 hour time system, taught by singularity stupid academic bastards. There are four simultaneous days in 24 hours. Keep thinking in your 1 cubic singularity stupid cubeless ways. Dr. Ray tought me this as he demonstrated his uncanny ability to "Square the Circle". Even your broken math cannot mask the truth of Cubic Existence.

    Make your silly time, fuck DST, and all your clocks are belong to us!

    1. Re:Dr. Gene Ray says that DST singularity stupid by porkchop_d_clown · · Score: 1

      How smart can he be if he doesn't know the difference between being unique (singularly) and being a black hole (singularity)?

    2. Re:Dr. Gene Ray says that DST singularity stupid by brsmith4 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I actually think, in some twisted, strange way that the idiot meant singularity.

  162. Winter Time by HishamMuhammad · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In Brazil, we call DST "Summer Time" (Horário de Verão). Sometimes we jokingly refer to the Standard Time as "Winter Time" (especially during the weeks before/after the switch).

    Since in this proposal the non-DST time would last only three months (Dec-Feb), you might as well call that "Winter Time". :)

  163. real men use UT by spasm · · Score: 1

    "how will the IT world handle this change?"

    change? you mean your hardware clock isn't set to UT?

  164. Y2K wasn't bad---This would be! by joshjoneswas · · Score: 1

    Talk about old programs that people didn't realize are not going to work. This could get ugly. But still, I like the pros of it also.

  165. damn the auto industry by Wolfier · · Score: 1

    Lobbyists.

    The reason they rejected increasing the mileage requirements of pickups, SUV and Minivans is "fear for instability in the auto industry".

    I call BS. I always believe that the biggest polluter should be the ones most responsible for lowering the pollutants.

    Fucking with DST is basically a "let everyone share MY cost!" scam.

  166. check out this book... by constantnormal · · Score: 1
    ... documenting the history behind the concept of "Daylight Savings Time": Spring Forward: The Annual Madness of Daylight Saving Time, which documents the use of DST as a bogus issue used by newspapers and politicians over the past hundred years whenever they feel a need to wind up the public and boost circulation or, to wind up the public and divert attention from political issues of significance.

    Suddenly those Turkish sheep that followed each other over the cliff don't seem so stoopid after all...

    Then you can really appreciate the following logic --

    If having DST 7 months out of 12 is good, and 9 months out of 12 is better,
    then BEST OF ALL WOULD BE... DST ALL YEAR ROUND!!!

    We would be saving that extra hour of daylight all year long!
    The benefits are incalculable -- the savings from decreasing our dependence on imported oil alone are incredible!

    Now rush right out and contact your legislators with this fantastic concept.

    DO IT NOW.

  167. Stupid programmers are the problem. by stienman · · Score: 1

    With many IT applications relying on accurate time information and many having automatic adjustments for DST, how will the IT world handle this change?

    I'll handle it the way I always handle it. I ignore it.

    The applications should be running on some standard time clock, such as UTC, and getting its time zone information (of which DST is a part) from a central time server that knows about it. The central time server, for me (use GPS or NIST), tells me when DST is.

    Programs that have to run on "human" time, which are subject to DST need some careful consideration. One needs to understand the difference between running on human time versus presenting information in human time. Only those that have to run on human time need to pay careful attention to the "DST change this week" signal, and take appropiate measures before, during, and after the extra or missing hour. Those that only need to present information in human time still have some work to so - if they store times in UTC they need to know when DST changed so reports viewed after the switch accurately reflect data from before the switch in adjusted human time.

    In our connected world there is little reason not to pay attention to NIST, GPS, and other accurate DST resources. We shouldn't be programming DST switches according to a fixed calculation - it can always go away or be changed. Further, it's different in every country, and many change it every year. All programs should take this from a central resource, or at worst allow for some user configuration of DST.

    -Adam

    1. Re:Stupid programmers are the problem. by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      How is GPS providing you with DST info? I would like to know if you have invented some way to do that!

      GPS already has a hard time providing you with UTC time. GPS time is different from UTC, and the exact difference is often quite difficult to obtain from the receiver (depends on manufacturer and firmware version).
      Times reported by GPS receivers are sometimes UTC, sometimes GPS time, and sometimes it is not even clear what they are.

      Converting the GPS-calculated position to a timezone is very difficult (it at least requires a detailed description of the timezone borders, and those are not even constant). Providing DST information is even more difficult, as this article explains.

      So please explain me (as the clever programmer you undoubtedly are, putting down your fellow programmers as stupid) how you are going to solve this with a GPS receiver.

    2. Re:Stupid programmers are the problem. by stienman · · Score: 1

      The GPS sentence of interest is $GPZDA. I don't use this sentence - but I do rely on the reported UTC in other sentences. Some GPS receivers do not provide this sentence, and I don't want to make the assumption in my program that all do.

      Times reported by GPS receivers are sometimes UTC, sometimes GPS time, and sometimes it is not even clear what they are.

      I haven't expereinced the problems you are describing.

      Converting the GPS-calculated position to a timezone is very difficult (it at least requires a detailed description of the timezone borders, and those are not even constant). Providing DST information is even more difficult, as this article explains.

      Yes, this is difficult. The main point is that one should rely on the computer system to provide accurate UTC and local time, and the computer should be synchronized to some reliable source which provides correct DST information. This may be a main time server that the computer listens to which does all the 'hard work', or it may be the system that the program is running on. Either way the program itself should not be changed - it should trust the computer time.

      The main time server should be synchronized to a correct UTC time source (such as GPS) and either another source of DST information or keep DST information locally such that it is easy to adjust DST parameters. Thus only one program on one system needs to be adjusted instead of auditing all the programs and systems in the organization.

      So please explain me (as the clever programmer you undoubtedly are, putting down your fellow programmers as stupid) how you are going to solve this with a GPS receiver.

      I'm sorry to have insulted those programmers who choose to make poor assumptions, and cause me (and others) problems down the road. However, I stand by my opinion that they are making poor, shortsighted decisions. Perhaps some are not in a position to choose the ideal path and it is not their fault.

      -Adam

  168. Hallmark? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean the *government* - on which they'll all get the day off. Hell, won't be long before there are more government holidays than there are work days.

    Government employees - can't get them to work, can't fire them. Totally useless.

  169. Sorry, but No! this will be a none issue. by runner_one · · Score: 1

    I've NEVER seen a motherboard with DST in the BIOS, The OS handles it. It will take Microsoft about 10 minutes to code a patch that will update the DST dates in Windows (Heck you can even disable DST with a single check box in all recent versions of windows,) and as others have pointed out *nix folks will take care of it easy also.
    This is a none issue as fare as PC's are concerned.
    The only ones screaming about this causing all sorts of problems are people that don't like DST anyway.

  170. Stupid anyway... by ivan256 · · Score: 1

    The batteries typically last the full year, yet the current scheme has them changed every six months "just in case." An extra two months won't make a difference, and most of us will continue to change the batteries when the damned things start beeping instead of when the clocks change anyway. To top it off, new construction has the detectors wired in to house current and uses detectors with rechargeable batteries anyway.

    Of course really people should just realize that the sun is up for the same number of hours a day regardless of what the clocks say and we should get rid of DST completely.

  171. DST == Mental Illness by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

    Dear Sweet Jesus, please make it stop -- I can't tell you how much I hate (hate, hate, Fucking Hate) Daylight Slavings Time ....

    -kgj

    --
    -kgj
  172. This is nothing by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

    Click and Clack is currently advocating Double Dog Daily Savings Time.

    --
    There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
  173. Dear Slashdot Turds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's Daylight Saving Time, NOT Daylight Savings Time. Morons.

  174. daylight savings obsolete by klept · · Score: 1

    If they are going to make time changes, why not put the whole world on UTC . Seriously, back in the 1800s every locality, town, villiage, had it's own time. This wrecked havoc with coordinating train schedules, and a Canadian named Fleming proposed standard time, which became GMT, which the world still follows today. Well technology has advanced, and with all the communications world wide over the internet and phone, it is becoming very cumbersome to know what time you are suppose to call or meet someone on the phone or net. I know it is for me. UTC will give the whole world one time. If I tell someone in Paris I am calling them at 3 and I live in LA, we will both be talking the same time with UTC. It will be 3 in LA and 3 in Paris.

  175. Woot! I'm In Arizona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Luckily I live in AZ, where I do not have to follow this!

  176. A feeling I had by rbarreira · · Score: 1

    I was reading TFA, and saw this sentence:

    Congressional leaders of both parties have signed off on a proposal, being considered in Washington this week, blah blah blah

    Geez, it sometimes feels so strange for someone who doesn't live in the US to see something like "both parties have signed"... Here we would see something like "all parties..."

    --

    The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
  177. Simpler Solution by vrimj · · Score: 1

    Change the hours of the typical workday instead. You can't do it for everyone, but you can do it for govermental agencies and courts.

  178. Goddamnit!!! WHY? by RussR42 · · Score: 0

    I'm sick of DST. Just get up earlier if you want more daylight. Easy. In fact, time zones in general piss me off. I pick up the phone and call halfway around the world, for all intents and purposes it's the same time everywhere. Why isn't it called the same time? Life would be easy. Who gives a damn it the sun rises at 4:00PM? What difference does it make? You still have to consult a lookup table to figure out what time it is there now, why not just label it the same and know that the sun will be in the middle of the sky at a different time.

    I knew it! I'm surrounded by assholes!

    Sorry for the rant, couldn't help it on this topic.

  179. Better to extend it 12 months by gxw · · Score: 1

    In other words, get rid of Daylight Savings Time. Its absurd. Businesses still change their hours at different times of the year (summer hours, holiday hours, etc), with or without Daylight Savings Time. As we become more of an International 24/7 community, Daylight Savings time simply makes no sense.

    Changing it (other than eliminating it) makes even less sense, considering the cost!

    1. Re:Better to extend it 12 months by RoboRay · · Score: 1

      I lived in Hawaii for 8 years and NOT having DST was one of the best parts of my stay there.

    2. Re:Better to extend it 12 months by aXis100 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I agree.

      Here in Australia many of the states have DST, making it light until 9:00 - 9:30pm at night during summer! What is the need for this?

      Im in Western Australia and we thankfully dont have DST. It works fine.

      If you need a special clock to tell you when you can stay outside longer, then you've got bigger problems than "saving daylight" - you'd better start looking after your few remaining braincells.

    3. Re:Better to extend it 12 months by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      making it light until 9:00 - 9:30pm at night during summer!

      I live in northern europe, and even up here it's worse. I need to be in bed by 10:30 PM, but due to DST, it's not dark until 11:30, and I can't fall asleep until then. I still need to get up at 7 AM though, so I lose an hour of sleep per day.

      Five hours of lost sleep per week is more than I can recover in the weekend, so I'm constantly tired, and don't get much done at work.

      Saving energy? Sure not getting anything done does save energy, but I don't think that's how it was intended.

  180. How about conservation incentives? by Halvard · · Score: 1
    ""The more daylight we have, the less electricity we use,'' said U.S. Rep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.), who co-sponsored the measure with U.S. Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.)."

    Well, yea, it's true.

    That's why it went into effect in the first place even though I did like it. It's why conservation is a good idea. Things like increased incentives for installing solar or wind power on businesses and homes would do wonders for the environment as well as help alleviate the need for new power plants.

    Just a few years ago, Cheney dismissively stated "conservation is a virtue" but not a national priority. Replacing grid transmission cable with fiber optics would do wonders too.

    Take a few billion US$ that America pumps into energy subsidies for big oil, big power, etc. and pump it into something that would provide for reduced consumption of oil and gas and increase available power with local renewable power generation, etc. That would provide huge benefits.

  181. On Indiana by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Owing to the forced relocation of some southern
    soldiers after the US Civil War, parts of
    Indiana still have a stone age mentality.
    (E.g., it's the birthplace of the KKK,
    even though you'd like 'bama or SC would be a
    more likely place.) So, parts of Indiana
    will not use daylights savings time, old
    or revised. (The 'tude: "It's a damn federal
    conspiracy, I tell ya.")

    Imagine that. Something from Lincoln's era is
    still affecting infotech works in Indiana to
    this very day!

  182. Take a non-US perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Other countries around the world regularly cope with DST boundaries moving best on political and religious decisions. Australia even moved DST forward for the 2000 Olympics.

    Does the world stop when this happens? Do computers really screw up where it matters when DST changes?

    Take a non-US perspective to fully understand the implications of what is being proposed.

  183. To put things in perspective by lbschenkel · · Score: 2, Informative

    You Americans are in fact lucky. To put things in perspective: in Brazil the Congress changes the DST rules *every year*.

  184. Canada & US Mexico & US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "and the trade between Mexico and the U.S. is the largest in the world."

    Umm, no.

    2002 Canada-US trade = $430 billion
    2002 Mexico-US trade = $232 billion

  185. how to handle it? oughta be easy. by ummit · · Score: 1
    With many IT applications... having automatic adjustments for DST, how will the IT world handle this change? And with the proposal reportedly taking effect this year, is there enough time to implement change?

    If the answers are not "trivially" and "yes", respectively, then someone has been incompetent.

    Everyone knows that DST rules are subject to change at politicians' whim -- the historical record amply demonstrates this. Moreover, handling those changes is a solved problem: have a central, easily-updatable repository of the DST rulesets, such that the "upgrade" to handle any new rules requires no patch at all, unless you call updating the repository to be a "patch". But you certainly shouldn't have N separate applications to patch.

    Most systems implement this sort of scheme already.

    DST may be a stupid idea, and there are fine reasons to oppose it, but if someone says that the reason we shouldn't tinker with the rules is because of potential IT costs or problems, that's an embarrasment: said someone has just shouted for all the world to hear that IT doesn't have its house in order.

  186. Is this provision actually in the passed law? by ahertz · · Score: 1

    Do a search in Thomas for HR 6, which is the bill in question. The section changing the daylight saving time date is Sec. 111. But... as far as I can tell, that section isn't in the final version passed by the senate (referred to as "H.R.6.EAS"). It also isn't in the "Public Print" of the bill (which you can find here.

    I'm not an expert of legislative technicalities, but it could very well be that we're all getting worked up about nothing. I guess we'll have to wait until Thomas posts the final version of the bill.

    --
    Information doesn't want to be anthropomorphized. -AC
  187. Re:Death to DST and Time Zones by MisterAvery · · Score: 1
    I share your sentiments, brave warrior!

    I used to be the DST/Time Zone Messiah for a large software company. Meaning that I was responsible for making sure that certain time APIs worked. It was supposed to be simple. All you have to do is lookup the delta and then apply it to GMT right? It wasn't. All because of DST and Time Zones and the history associated with them.

    Everyone wanted their documents to reflect the exact time that they were created. They also wanted to be able to calculate the exact time when something occurred in the past. I had headaches dealing with leap days, time zones, DST. I'd get all these bugs from people saying: "My files changed creation dates!"or "The calculation for [some lame historical event] isn't right!" The worst part was when I got some bug for a mail server client that was working on legacy hardware but needed to interface with our new stuff. Sigh.

    I think I'm done complaining. Sometimes I miss working there. But when I see topics like these, I feel wonderful!

  188. Just another chapter... by dodongo · · Score: 1

    ... in the great Indiana Daylight Saving Time saga! Just this past year, our state legislature voted to turn the entire state to Daylight Saving Time. As it stands now, 77 counties in Indiana do not, with the other 15 scattered amongst northwest, southeast, and southwest Indiana, which, due to their proximity to large metropolitan areas in other time zones, already observe DST (the states in the southern part of the state on ET, in the north on CT).

    Now, that's confusing, right? Add in, though, that the legislature never would've gotten the bill passed had it specified a time zone proper for the 77 central counties.

    Now, since the legislature just voted to enact DST without specifiying what happens to the 77 other counties, we don't know what time zone we're in! The Feds have refused to order the change as a whole, wanting instead to have hearings on a county-by-county basis! And until such time as either A) hearings can take place to officially move Indiana to Central time (except for the counties in the south which would remain on ET), or B) next summer comes and we're on ET de facto, we're sort of stuck in a netherworld. As the law is written by default, we'd start observing full ET, DST and all come next April, but the jury is strongly divided as to whether or not we should move to central.

    And you think changing a couple damn lines of code is a problem?!

  189. Get up an hour earlier by j_w_d · · Score: 4, Insightful

    DST is a stupid, utterly assinine idea and is Ben Franklin's major evidence of being human and prone to occasional, stunning attacks of stupid. Why set the frigging clock ahead or back when all you have to do is designate earlier times: "our summer business hours are 7am to 4pm" would accomplish the same thing without having solar noon arrive at 1:00pm by the clock. Arizona has the right idea.

    --
    ------ The only greater hazard to your liberty than n politicians is n+1 politicians.
  190. right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um, I like how you can twist ANY story into a slashdot story by simply inserting a line like this: "How will this affect the IT industry? How will they adjust to this change?"

    Please, can we get some REAL news for nerds?

  191. DST by mirful · · Score: 0

    Here in Arizona, we are not yet modern enough to use Daylight Savings Time. And we do not care about DST. Not for a second. Or for an hour forward or back.

  192. My Proposal. by AvitarX · · Score: 1

    I propose that we eliminate "bad" daylight savings day (spring) and increase the frequency of "good" daylight savings time to be weekly (every Sunday after the bars close).

    then once a month after the time becomes 4 or 5 hours off we can adjust things by turning the first Monday of every month into a Holiday and making it either 19 or 20 hours to reset things.

    --
    Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  193. I hate DST! by jocknerd · · Score: 1

    It might have been useful 100 years ago when we were an agricultural society, but I just don't see the benefit now.

    If you want daylight, get up earlier.

  194. Got Fooled Again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I read the headline I thought the Government
    was going to actually do something sensible like
    eliminate DST altogether. Should have known better
    than to expect the Gov. to be sensible!!!
    Darn...

    Yours Truly,
    Eternal Optimist

  195. new day light savings standard by ShortBeard · · Score: 0

    I suggest that we adjust the time to our clocks daily.

    Trust me on this, I'm with the chimps and monkeys (and we are just hairless apes) on this subject.

    I mean, doesn't the Earth revolve about the Sun? So every day the sunrise is a little later or a little earlier.
    I think having clocks/watches that would minutely adjust for this would be great! The morning would always look about at the same state every morning.

    No more would you go to work in the dark and come home in the dark.
    If you are into agriculture (where your schedule follows that of your crops) this would help as everyone else would be keeping the same time as you.

    If you are able to wake up to sunlight (most natural) then you could fire your alarm clock or maybe keep it as back-up. I think this would be beneficial to people who work 2nd and 3rd shifts as well.

    Think about it. No more losing an hour or having to adjust those clocks that don't adjust themselves.

    I know businesses and banks wouldn't like this but screw them! If we all hang together they would have no choice.

    Join me my brethren in ushering in a New Age of Reason! One where We push Time around! Never again to painfully re-adjust to a new time! Let's keep the time of our farthest fore-fathers.

  196. the airlines will love it... by youta · · Score: 1

    Just think of flight schedules for international travel, many people buy tickets well in advance for the holidays or the high season. Since the rest of the world isn't shifting, the airlines will have to notify customers of different departure times.

  197. Markey and Upton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The more daylight we have, the less electricity we use,'' said U.S. Rep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.), who co-sponsored the measure with U.S. Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.). Hello, Representative Dumbass. i'd like to point out that we can't make more daylight. You can shift it from morning to afternoon, but we don't have more of it. Tool.

    Thank you, that is all.

  198. Re:Death to DST and Time Zones by jjhlk · · Score: 1

    I was going to include some of that sentiment, but I thought I'd start small. With the internet age, it at least wouldn't hurt for netizens to use GMT instead of hassle with timezones (How many clan meets have I missed). But I'm all for GMT all-the-way.

  199. Some Elementary Astronomy by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

    ""The more daylight we have, the less electricity we use,'' said U.S. Rep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.)"

    The amount of sunlight depends on the rotation and tilt of the earth, not an arbitrary setting on a time marking device. Nothing, including this law, can change that. You can't legislate nature.

    Institute flex time nationwide and you solve most of this problem, and others. More people take the early bias on flex time rather than the late. It also helps solve traffic congestion. Less congestion means less petrol burned less efficiently, reducing emissions.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
    1. Re:Some Elementary Astronomy by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1
      ""The more daylight we have, the less electricity we use,'' said U.S. Rep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.)"

      The amount of sunlight depends on the rotation and tilt of the earth, not an arbitrary setting on a time marking device. Nothing, including this law, can change that. You can't legislate nature.


      That is true, but he really means "the more daylight we have when we are at home".

      Of course, it simply replaces night-time lighting with daytime air-conditioning/furnace usage.
  200. Atlantic zone by yack0 · · Score: 1

    This follows on the heels of the Maine's legislature voting to move to the Atlantic time zone. Of course, Maine was planning to just move to Atlantic zone but not use daylight time anymore. The suggestion to increase daylight time for the rest of the US make the impact of Maine decision another two months smaller. Kind of makes it pointless, IMHO.

    One article on Maine's time zone thing

    --
    -- There is no sig line, only Zuul.
  201. Farmers *hate* DST by billstewart · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Dairy Farmers have traditionally hated DST. Not only do the cows need milking in the morning (which is much easier after sunrise than in the dark), but lots of *real* farmers also have day jobs, either in factories or stores, so if the day job starts an hour earlier during DST, they've got to get up earlier to deal with the cows. Farmers without cows don't care as much.

    DST is there to make factory workers get up an hour earlier, without the government having to admit that it's telling everybody to get up earlier in the morning. Rather than messing with the clocks, they *could* just tell the TV stations to run earlier schedules, and most Americans would obey....

    There's no reason to set the clock to some other time - during Standard Time, the sun is at its highest at 12 Noon in the middle of the timezone area, and you could just as well leave it there.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  202. another reason .... by ankhank · · Score: 1

    http://www.taemag.com/issues/articleID.18581/artic le_detail.asp
    Daylight Savings!
    By Kelly Jane Torrance ... Michael Downing .... has recently published Spring Forward: The Annual Madness of Daylight Saving Time (Shoemaker & Hoard), a charming light history of time in America. ... one can conclude from Spring Forward that we should blame the twice-yearly time change on capitalists. Downing explains that "without Daylight Saving, the commodities, stock, and bond traders on Wall Street could expect no opportunity at all for arbitrage--buying securities on one market for immediate resale in another market at an advantageous price and profiting by the price discrepancy." The time change gave traders one hour in which the London Stock Exchange and the New York Stock Exchange were both open. .... Federal legislators often justified their bills by arguing that the change would save fuel costs. But Downing argues that a real case for this was never made.....

  203. Dumb! by hugg · · Score: 1

    This is dumb. DST has been in effect for about 40 years. It precedes the software industry as we know it. The cost of patching all the devices, hardware + software, is likely to run into the billions. Maybe these congressmen think our IT industry needs a quick jolt? Great, but what about the expense to the industries using the technology.

    How about initiatives for smart energy policies instead of quick hacks? Almost every household in the U.S. could save 1% on their energy bill if they just had a little education/incentive.

    I say we have a national referendum on DST, and settle this once and for all. My bet is it would be sent packing, by a landslide.

  204. Global perspective by fulldecent · · Score: 1

    What other countries have DST? Do they indent to change as well?

    --

    -- I was raised on the command line, bitch

    1. Re:Global perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would they? Did the US change when Australia changed (they're different DST boundaries anyhow)? No.

      Sounds like you (and many others here) really don't understand why DST is actually needed and where it is needed.

      The fact is simply considering longitude in a time calculation isn't enough. The closer you are to the pole, the shorter your days are in winter, and the longer they are in summer. Therefore, latitude also plays a part; it is also the reason why you don't see many regions and countries located near the equator using DST.

      Overlaid over the above lat/long considerations though are political and religious ones.

      Do you now see why there isn't an impact?

  205. Thank you Arizona! by RobertBasil · · Score: 1

    Thank God I live in Arizona and don't have to put up with the "change your clocks forward and backwards" crap.

  206. Move New England to Atlantic Time by kcurtis · · Score: 1

    It is absolutely absurd that Boston - nevermind West Quoddy Head, Maine - is in the same timezone as Detroit, MI.

    Legislators here in MA have suggested moving to the Atlantic Time zone, getting the benefits of "Daylight Savings" year-round.

    Unfortunately, it is just a pipe dream.

  207. But how is the Queen of Canada decided? by manonthemoon · · Score: 1

    In Australia at least, its whomever, you guessed it, the Queen/King of England is... kind of circular reasoning to me...

  208. Year-round DST by Sharkeys-Day · · Score: 1

    Yes, just make DST *the* time year-round, like pretending you live in the next time zone over.

    Nobody has to change their clocks, and everybody gets to sleep in an extra hour.

    Actually, by the timezone map, Alaska has already done that (but their daylight hours are messed up from being so far north). Hawaii straddles the hour line, so they are basically on half saving time all the time, depending on which island they are on.

    It can't be that bad. The people in western china have to deal with the official time being 2-3 hours off sun time.

  209. Mohahaha by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

    Real sysadmins use Z on their equipment. And if you don't, your network isn't big enough to deserve any sympathy to have to patch for this kind of change.

    --
    Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
  210. Changes to the system by Tekoneiric · · Score: 1

    The whole IT aspect to this issue is really part of a larger issue. Computers and various time keeping devices are too dependent on our method of date and time keeping. Any changes in our calendar system or a shift in time keeping as in the DST will cause disruption and large amounts of work for IT departments. Imagine what would happen if the political winds changed and something like the International Fixed Calendar were to be adopted.

    --
    *It's not what you can do for the Dark Side but what the Dark Side can do for you!*
  211. Queen of Canada? by Odd+John · · Score: 1

    I thought Celine Dion is the Queen of Canada!

    Or maybe it's William Shatner.

    No. Wait. He's the Drama Queen of Canada.

  212. Russia by clockmaker · · Score: 1

    I remember once reading that Russia did this - daylight savings during winter and double daylight savings during winter. And this is a country that knows time zones. And dark winter days.

  213. IT'S THE END OF THE WORLD! by Gamingboy · · Score: 1

    ...MY COMPUTER WILL SET ITSELF TO NON-DAYLIGHT SAVINGS TIME 2 MONTHS TOO EARLY! ....Uhhh, hello, has anyone thought that maybe, you could, well, O, TURN IT BACK MANUALLY!

  214. Baaaahhhhhh by Ravenseye · · Score: 1

    Why isn't anyone more than a little upset that the government is mandating that we pretend it's a different time every so often. I like the poster that said if you want more daylight, get up earlier. I just don't get how it's OK that one day, you wake up, and BY LAW, you lose an hour. Give up on DST. What a stupid idea. We're turning into a nation of sheep. At least sheep don't have to figure out this time shifting thing that we do....

  215. Think of the children! by WalksOnDirt · · Score: 1

    You know, we tried extending daylight savings time before, back in the energy crises of the 1970s (or there abouts). It was shortened back to its present form to keep kids from being run over going to school in the dark (at one end), and allowing them to celebrate a traditional Halloween without staying up too late (at the other end).

    Going back to try this again sounds inordinately stupid to me.

    --
    a,e,i,o,u and sometimes w and y (at be if of up cwm by)
  216. Oh please for the love of god DO IT! by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    I get really depressed in the Winter when it gets dark at 4 in the afternoon... even though I go into work at 5am to have just those couple of hours to do things outside, it would be nice to not have to get up so goddamn early just to not feel miserable all the time...

    1. Re:Oh please for the love of god DO IT! by pclminion · · Score: 1
      I get really depressed in the Winter when it gets dark at 4 in the afternoon...

      Guess what, it's STILL going to get dark at 4 in the afternoon. The winter soltice occurs near December 21st, which is outside of the adjusted window. This won't make any difference in the deep of winter.

  217. DST is backwards. Literally. by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    During winter in Sydney, I get home in the dark even though it's only 6pm. This means that it's practically impossible to do any work which involves being outside (short of installing new lights... rental house, and all that) and that the only time I can get any home productivity is on the weekends.

    Meanwhile during summer, they add an extra hour of daylight to the day.

    If you ask me, they have it the wrong way around. If you're going to have daylight "savings" time, let's move the daylight hours to where they will actually help... winter.

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  218. Indiana by Wicked187 · · Score: 1

    Being in the Hoosier state which is on EST all year round, rather than switching EDT, we have a unique perspective. Our legislation finally passed DST for us this year. We have heard all of the crazy rambles against it. These are same rambles that everyone is arguing about extending DST.

    Here is something ridiculous. People do NOT actually think that we are affecting the Earth's rotation, so stop telling everyone that they are idiots for thinking so (obviously, there most likely are a few out there, but not the general populus). We are shifting our schedule so that we have more daylight during the majority of people's waking hours. Since we consume more resources when we are awake, being able to use sunlight for longer, rather than artificial lighting, we WILL be saving resources. The crazy thing is... I see mostly tree hugging liberals complaining about DST (that and the hillbilly portion of the conservative group). This is actually a move for better treatment of the environment. Now, let me qualify that statement by saying this is what I found in the debate in Indiana. Perhaps the national debate will not have tree hugging liberals being hypocritical, it is still young... we have been fighting for DST in Indiana for decades with the hillbillies being the resistance for twenty years, and the tree huggers doing if for the past ten when the hillbillies IQ, on average, seemed to jump about 10-15 points higher. Why were the tree huggers in Indiana against it? Because it was proposed by our recently gotten Republican majority in the House and Senate in our state government, and the end of a 16 year governorship by Democrats. The DST issue was brought up by Republicans, and they want them to fail... plain and simple.

    So let's all agree. We do not actually think we are changing the Earth's rotation. We know that the actually number of daylight hours will remain the same. We also know that there will be some difficult adjustments. However, ten years from now, it will be a distant memory, and we will be consuming less resources because we have more naturally produced resources during the time when we will be using them.

    Do not let this become silly partisan BS like it did in Indiana... we all know this is really the right thing to do, so let's do it. Liberals, for the most part, because we are being a more green society, and conservatives, for the most part, because it will be more economical.

    I myself, being an ultra-conservative, economically, and a moderate, to slightly right, social conservative who rather side on the grounds of common sense... I like it from all angles. Save money, use less resources, which reduces foreign reliance on oil, increases security, and makes for cleaner air and water for us all to live with.

    --
    Politics, Life, and More on my Aspiring for the Future
  219. Parent is Flamebait or Troll by Dire+Bonobo · · Score: 1, Interesting
    > What kind of a country is this where you can get a knee-jerk reaction
    > against anything by calling it "American-style"? (I'll tell you: it's
    > the kind of country that, 138 years later, still prints their colonial
    > ruler's face on their money.)

    Why is this modded as "Insightful" rather than "Flamebait" or "Troll"?

    Aside from the fact that the poster appears to be seeing "knee-jerk reaction" in the article that few others are seeing---most everyone else seems to consider it quite coolly and reasonably written---posting a newspaper article for the express purpose of insulting its country of origin is difficult to call anything other than trolling for a flamewar.


    As for the secondary point of the poster, well, there are plenty of good reasons why Canada wouldn't be quite so interested in extending DST as the US. The most obvious one is that the US is further south, and hence doesn't have nearly as many worries about icy roads---making everyone drive to work an hour earlier in November mornings is going to put a whole lot more people at risk from black ice on the roads.

  220. Proposal by earthbound+kid · · Score: 1

    1. Abolish Daylight Savings Time.
    2. Announce that all government offices, schools, etc. will open and close 1 hour earlier in the period from March to November.
    3. Encourage other business to do likewise.

    Done!

    1. Re:Proposal by Elf-friend · · Score: 1

      One problem with that: It makes too damn much sense.

  221. Legislators now unsure by GaryOlson · · Score: 1

    Appears Congresscritters are feeling the "heat"

    --
    Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
  222. Instant mountain, just add molehill. by porkchop_d_clown · · Score: 1

    I honestly can't believe this is such a big deal. Every country has their own DST rules already, any software that needs to work in the global environment needs to know these rules and, best of all, modern operating systems already handle these rules so that individual apps are blissfully unaware of what timezone they are in.

    So...

    Who cares if someone adds a new ruleset?

  223. I don't understand daylights time meddling by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The point, Captain Obvious, is to provide the most daylight during waking hours for the average diurnal person.

    And having different work schedules depending on season is somehow inconcievable, and changing the actual time for the entire country is, somehow, a better approach.

    I mean, change the 9to5 for 8to4? WHAT? NEVER! Lets have all clocks in the country changed instead, duh!

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:I don't understand daylights time meddling by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
      And having different work schedules depending on season is somehow inconcievable

      Yes. It is. Unless you own your own business, please tell me how it goes when you try to switch your company over to a work schedule based on the almanac.

      I mean, change the 9to5 for 8to4? WHAT? NEVER! Lets have all clocks in the country changed instead, duh!

      It's easier to change one beauracracy - even an enormous one - than an infinity of smaller ones. I mean, if Congress' goal is maximizing the overlap between waking hours and sunlight, what the hell are they supposed to do, legislate the time each business opens? Yes, it's easier to change the clocks.

    2. Re:I don't understand daylights time meddling by surprise_audit · · Score: 1

      I wonder if I'll still be working 10:30pm to 7am when this takes effect??

    3. Re:I don't understand daylights time meddling by JLF65 · · Score: 1

      It's even easier to not change the clocks OR the business hours. I like fact that here in Arizona, it's the same time all the time. You other folk are just plain weird. So it saves less than 1% on electricity... big whoop. I'll pay the extra 25 cents a month on my power bill, thank you very much. Just another example of the government minding the pennies, while blowing the big bucks.

  224. Mod Parent Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That was too funny. I just wish I had some mod points.

  225. Saving Oil? by ozTravman · · Score: 1

    Daylight savings originated in Germany during World War One as a way to save oil used to burn lamps at night. This quickly spread to the US and the UK. It was removed after WW1 ended but reinstated in 1942 for WW2. Is this extra 2 months of daylight savings a desperate attempt to save oil for the "War on Terror"?

  226. Dupe? by Insightfill · · Score: 1
    Even the Federal gov't is into them, it seems:

    three months ago...

  227. What will they do? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

    "how will the IT world handle this change?"

    They'll handle it by learning to get it right the first time. When is DST? When the signal put out by WWV and WWVB says it is. End of problem.

    Or you can just ignore it, much like Unix has ignored several decades worth of leap seconds (a far more thorny problem, in my opinion, than periodically being off by an integer hour).

  228. Cow Time by Bigos · · Score: 0

    I was brought up on a farm. On the kitchen wall there was a clock that was always set to Standard time and never changed. We used to call it cow clock, so the cattle was fed and milked at righ time.

  229. I don't care by Bohemoth2 · · Score: 1

    Sun come up, sun go down, makes no difference to me.

    they should eliminate dst altogether IMHO.

  230. Another fine political solution we do not need by virtualthinker · · Score: 1

    Daylight Wasting Time has got to be one of the most stupid solutions ever devised to a completely non-existant problem... Truthfully I could live with it from May to September, but why do we need everyone rushing off to work before daylight four months of the year? Why do we need school children out waiting for the school bus in the dark four months of the year? How can moving the AM rush hour into darkness save energy? How can moving the PM rush hour into the heat of the day save energy? The problem is our politicans are so busy fighting about stupid stuff, the only thing they can agree on, is this sort of non solution to a non problem. It would make more sense to eliminate all underware except thongs, saving fabric, energy, and the raw materials... More daylight wasting time is something we can certainly live without...

  231. Let's not forget Ramadan by mbius · · Score: 1

    Is there a reason the children can't take a nap? Or, for that matter, sleep in that morning?

    Assuming you're legally entitled to take religious holidays off work, school, etc., you can restructure your day around the daylight and not business hours.

    --
    you can have my violent video games when you pry them from my cold, dead hands.
    Prime UID Club
  232. The major issue by schnitzi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm now in Australia (where they also have DST), working on a project that involves entering important patient information, which can occur around the clock.

    In the course of writing the handler for DST, we came to realise that any standard UI widget that only lets you enter a date and a time is fundamentally flawed for dealing with critically important dates and DST. This is because every possible time that occurs between 1am and 2am on the "fall back" night (in the current system) actually occurs twice that night, an hour apart from each other, and there's no way to disambiguate which one it is given only the date and the time.

    I suspect this is not accounted for at all in a LOT of systems. We haven't come across any kind of standard way for the user to indicate whether they mean 1:30am before the "fall back" (for instance) or 1:30am after.

    --



    I object to that article, and to the next reply.
    1. Re:The major issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      There are 3 things to consider:

      - how a time is input;
      - how a time is output; and
      - how a time is stored.

      Dealing with the last first, always store your times in UTC (GMT) form. That way, any comparisons with any other time do not have to consider time zones. Everything is normalised to UTC and life becomes simple.

      When time is input you can either: (i) input the time in its UTC form; or (ii) input it in its local time. If the local time is ambiguious (as you cited) then the widget will normally assume the earlier time. If it is critical that there is no ambiguity then disallow local time input: force the entry of UTC time. Note however, that you're probably only going to get ambiguity for a very small percentage of data entry (between 1am and 2am in the case of Oz). Whether this is acceptable or not depends on your application (you could even trap the ambiguity and ask the user to resolve it).

      When time is output it will be possible to again have ambiguity but, technically, the output is still correct. If you need to make a comparison of the time in the output then use the UTC form (as in the way the time is stored).

  233. DST - source of confusion and chaos by Max_W · · Score: 1

    It just adds to chaos, which we try to overcome.

  234. Timezones are evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    DST calculations doubly so. Everywhere on the planet should be GMT. I get up at 5pm, people in London get up at 7am. No pesky timezones to figure out. If we have a meeting at 3am, the meeting is at 3am everywhere.

    No more Indian timezones off by 30 minutes, or the zone in Nepal that's off by 15 minutes.

  235. Being Different is OK... by algf2004 · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    I wish my (Canadian) government would step up and make their own damn decisions, rather than follow every silly thing the U.S. government comes up with. Now it's DST; next it'll be DMCA, then bye-bye public health care.

    If the U.S. wants to change their DST, fine. Canada doesn't need to. Everything works fine here. It's not broke, so it doesn't need to be fixed.

    So Long U.S.A, and Thanks for All the Fish.

    1. Re:Being Different is OK... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The nearer you are to the north/south pole, the more beneficial DST is.

      Thus what the US might do should benefit Canada more than the US technically. :-)

  236. Re:I think Canada should follow Saskatchewan's lea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to live much further north and I since moving I really miss the days when it would be 10pm and still completely light out. Closer to the border it is very obscure that the sun comes up around 5am and it's completely bright out but around 9pm it starts getting dark.

    I highly agree with the winter though. It is an utter waste of sunlight when it's not sunny until 9am and it's gone by 4pm.

    Perhaps what would benefit Canada is if more regions followed the Peace region of BC and use a different setup than the southern portions. In the Peace region, during the winter they use the same time as Alberta and during the summer they use the same time as BC. In other words, they use Mountain time with no daylight savings.

  237. corporate work scheme by slazar · · Score: 1

    I think this is a scheme to get more work out of us. Generally people don't like to be at work when the sun goes down.

    A better switch would be to the metric system.

    1. Re:corporate work scheme by bach37 · · Score: 1

      I agree. Something is fishy here if Bush is wanting to sign this. Sounds like this is to help out the corporate world's stocks go up 0.5% so a CEO can make more money off of the poor work force. Extra light at the end of the day will probably result in longer work days, indirectly.

  238. DST by slashflood · · Score: 2, Insightful


    I'd be so happy if "they" would give up the daylight saving time. All my clocks are running UTC and I'm just calculating the local time on the fly since years. It's much easier than setting all my watches and clocks all the time. In the broadcasting business nobody cares about any time offsets anyway. It's all about UTC.

    The funny thing is, that the switchover is not happening at the same date worldwide. That makes the whole problem more difficult.

    It's confusing enough for me, that for example LA is nine (or ten!) hours "back".

  239. but... by StarsAreAlsoFire · · Score: 1

    ... 10am to 2pm is my standard lunch hour......

  240. You know your government is out of control.... by demachina · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You know your government is out of control... when it institutes daylight savings time in the first place, and you know its really out of control when it starts randomly changing when the arbitrary change occurs.

    Time and time zones are kind of a creation of governments, especially the British empire, which is why GMT is where it is. Time zones are OK things, especially versus the chaos that they imposed order on.

    But daylight savings time is a complete abomination. If the time when kids go to school or you go to work doesn't jive well with the Sun, then change the time you go to school or work and don't F**K with time itself. Politicians who sieze control of time are just engaging in the ultimate power grab, ita a ... we are so powerful we can change time and if you ants don't like it you can stick it kind of attitude.

    --
    @de_machina
    1. Re:You know your government is out of control.... by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 2, Informative
      ...which is why GMT is where it is.

      Not really. The location of GMT was chosen so that the meridian opposite to it would go through the least inhabited region (namely the pacific ocean). Indeed, that meridian is the so-called dateline, and you don't really want to have a situation where in one village it's Wednesday, but in the neighboring village it's still Tuesday. So you put the dateline into the middle of the ocean, and you end up with Prime Meridian going through Britain.

    2. Re:You know your government is out of control.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The pacific is pretty big, and the dateline isn't exactly straight as it is.

      I doubt the fact that it goes through GB is a cooincidence.

  241. Silliness: Politicians at work! by tcgroat · · Score: 1
    This is politics at its comic best. They want to extend DST until just a month before the winter solstice? In November there's not enough daylight to save! The lights that are off for an hour in the afternoon will be on an extra hour in the morning, because most people must rise before dawn to get to work and school on time. Furnaces with a set-back thermostat will be turned up for an extra pre-dawn hour, at the coldest point in the diurnal cycle. Meanwhile, late March and early April have more than twelve hours of available daylight per day--but no DST!

    If they want to fix DST, it would be more sensible to move both the starting date and the end date according to the available hours of daylight (think "equinox"). DST makes more sense in late March than it does in October, let alone November.

  242. Spaniards... by Bodrius · · Score: 1

    You keep using that word, I don't think you know what it means...

    --
    Freedom is the freedom to say 2+2=4, everything else follows...
  243. When I was in Spain by lorcha · · Score: 1
    The Spaniards spoke Spanish. That's it. No English. No French. No German. Just Spanish.

    People make fun of Americans for speaking only one language. Well, these people have never met a Spaniard.

    --
    "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
    1. Re:When I was in Spain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Qué dices?? Los españoles podemos hablar un montón de idiomas, lo que pasa es que no queremos.

      España es diferente (Spain is different)

  244. Daily tests by Nurgled · · Score: 1

    I test my smoke detector daily by cooking dinner. As of yesterday, it's still working.

  245. Whats the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If there is only going to be about four months (nov-mar)of "standard time", then whats the point of changing at all? If daylight savings time is so good lets just stick with it year around.

  246. Queue the DST contractors... by C0d1ngM0nk3y · · Score: 0

    Remember the year 2000 gold rush for contractors? Well prepare for another.

    The sad thing about this problem is that it's being created deliberately by a bunch of idiotic beurocrats with too much time on their hands, rather than because of the need to save two bytes of data.

    And all to be done at short notice... ha ha... let the over-charging commence! /Rubs paws together.

  247. patch my sundial? by nilbog · · Score: 1

    I know it won't be officially supported, but do you think someone could write a hack for my sundial so it will comply with this?

    --
    or else!
  248. DST is a lifesaver to those with SAD by Starrider · · Score: 1

    As someone who has Seasonal Affective Disorder, switching back to Standard Time can be hell. This fall I will have to sit in front of a special lamp so my body thinks it's still daylight outside. At least I live in the South, and we have longer days in the winter than people in the northern states.

    Businesses like keeping the same hours regardless of season, and it's a lot easier to program in daylight savings time than to have to change your hours every season.

    Which is easier, changing the clocks or asking the whole world to adjust every few months and "get up an hour earlier"?

    Never overestimate the power of the psychological.

    1. Re:DST is a lifesaver to those with SAD by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

      I kind of get a mild case of that too. I haven't had to resort to the lamps, though. Actually 2 years ago I got new car with a sunroof. (first car I've ever had that had a sunroof). I found that the extra sunlight I'm getting on my commute has made a big difference, especially in the winter (I live in Canada). ...Just something to consider.

    2. Re:DST is a lifesaver to those with SAD by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1

      Standard Time is real time. If you really have SAD, you'd be unhappy with or without DST--although you'd probably be happier without it, since the change in day length would be gradual.

    3. Re:DST is a lifesaver to those with SAD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it should be the switch to DST that should be difficult for you, since if the sun rises at, say, 7:30 a.m. for you at the end of DST it would rise at 6:30 a.m. when you switch to standard, and since it's the amount of daylight you get *early* in the day that can mitigate SAD.

      -- Mild SAD sufferer in northern Vermont

  249. Let's switch to a metric time system by 5plicer · · Score: 1

    100 "centidays" per day I say :p

    --
    The bits on the bus go on and off... on and off... on and off...
  250. save energy? by tsioc · · Score: 1

    the more daylight we have the less energy we use? WTF? changing our clocks WILL NOT change the amount of time the sun is up. why do we even have daylight savings? cant we just pick one time zone and stick with it?

  251. Re:Software yes, Atomic hardware no. by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1
    How about those "Atomic Clocks" sold at Radio Shack and Wal-mart?

    If the one sold at Radio Shack is this Atomic Digital Travel Clock, then it receives a signal from WWVB, and their digital signal includes a daylight savings time indication, so assuming they do the right thing the "atomic clock" will Just Work.

    Really, people, this is probably a lot less complicated than you might think. Many UN*Xes can just deal with it with zoneinfo file updates, and several people have indicated that it's a registry change in Windows. Perhaps some applications have their own time zone rule files, and perhaps OS/360^H^H^H^H^H^HMVS and z/OS aren't as easy to fix, but a lot of machines and applications will require only a small file/registry tweak.

  252. Sweden reverting back by Harald+Paulsen · · Score: 1

    Actually, after a 40 year trial with RHD a few elderly people still can't cope so they're reverting to LHD in 2007!

    (..or so goes an old joke about swedes)

    --
    Harald
  253. Have been tried in EU... does NOT work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We in the north (of EU) are using more power than before the change and the saving in the south does not compensate for it.
    DST has been "reinvented" during the oil crisis in the '70ties to save on the oil reserves... it is optimiezed for minimizing fuel consumption (and are good for the environment as a side effect) if it is changed the fuel consumption goes up in the north and down in the south (North and south are on the northern hemisfere).
    A more efficient DST must to be in steps, just like the timezones.

  254. Get rid of BST/DST by TheoGB · · Score: 1

    I agree with others about daylight savings time. British Summer Time sucks balls and is pointless and should be got rid of. I'm guessing that the U.S. finds it similarly lacking in reason any more. It's supposedly for farmers, isn't it? But I've never seen the point - they aren't in an office so they can just get up with the sunrise, surely?

    1. Re:Get rid of BST/DST by MattParkins · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree more (I'm from UK too). Apparently its because of farmers and schoolkids going to school in the dark in the far North reaches of Scotland & the shetlands, etc. Excuse me but why does the WHOLE of the UK need to change its clocks because the a local council in Scotland can't be bothered to ask the local schools/businesses to start an hour later !? Talk about using a sledgehammer to crack a nut.

  255. The whole world? by putaro · · Score: 1

    Guess what - many (most?) other countries don't play daylight savings games. I'm living in Japan right now (I'm an American) and I truly do not miss it at all. Japan had DST during the occupation and the first thing they did after MacArthur left was chuck it.

  256. Re:Old Joke about that by Captain_Cozmic · · Score: 1

    An old joke about this is to tell your boss: I need to have shorter working hours; sixty minutes is just too darn long.

  257. Working with the US will get harder... by corneliusagain · · Score: 1

    It's already a pain when there's one week a year where Europe and the US are not the normal number of hours. This will make it worse, especially at the time when the west coast is 9-10 hours apart from Europe instead of 8-9. Obviously for other people it will get easier at times, but surely global effects count in favour of keeping this stuff as simple and strandard as possible.

  258. Date Prime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Time Zones and DST is too similar in thinking as Time Cube, as in a "Stupid educated learn DST" kinda way.

    Support universal digital time, via Triangular Earth Calender. For time and calendar, it's simply the most logical.

  259. Legislature by rrgg · · Score: 1

    "All that is left is a signoff by President Bush." False. The House and Senate must both vote on the bill.

  260. Energy savings? by Art_Vandelai · · Score: 1
    Presumably, if it's lighter outside when we get home from work, we'll use less energy.

    Never mind increasing automobile mileage standards, let's change the time to make us feel better about using twice as much energy as anyone else on the planet.

  261. Time is overrated by Sol_Web_Dude · · Score: 1

    Here in Indiana, we just saw our great "Never have to change time" lives taken away by the "paid for by business" politicians. I now have the choice to move to AZ or just ignore clocks.

    "Clocks! We don't need no stink'n clocks!"

    Now I just get there when I get there and leave when I want.

    Peachy!

  262. Re:I think Canada should follow Saskatchewan's lea by frostfreek · · Score: 1

    Hear, hear!
    As someone who has been involved with DST related programming, this couldn't happen soon enough for me.
    Now, what can we do about this, to make it happen?
    Well, for one, we could write a virus, err, I mean a self-replicating utility, that forces everyone's computer to stay off DST! Ha! That alone could do the trick!

    PS., I am rather surprised to see someone complain about too much of that 'DAMN' sunlight!

  263. daylight "saving" time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    anyone point out that you can't actually "saves" time? you can save time, though.

  264. Re:Use UTC by pjaromin · · Score: 1

    WTF? How is this "Bush's" plan... from the article: "The more daylight we have, the less electricity we use,'' said U.S. Rep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.), who co-sponsored the measure with U.S. Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.). I guess the truth doesn't matter...as long as there's another excuse to bash Bush.

  265. Re:Thank GOD I use Windows.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone here know what that jerk is talking about ??

  266. question by AxemRed · · Score: 1

    If they want to set DST for 9 months out of the year, why don't they just set DST for 12 months and eliminate the need to change the clocks at all?

  267. I hate DST by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

    I hate DST with a passion fueled by the very fires of hell. My question is why mess with the actual wall clock time, when instituting national 'summer hours' would be easier? After all, what you're trying to do is modify human behavior.

    On whatever date, all stores/gov't offices switch to summer hours - open an hour earlier in the summer. The clocks are left alone, there's no double 2am problem, TV schedules stay the same, life goes on as before without the need to futz with clocks.

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    1. Re:I hate DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or we could just tax the shit of energy use. That seems to modify peoples behavior really quickly. :)

  268. Re:I think Canada should follow Saskatchewan's lea by PhraudulentOne · · Score: 1

    I agree, I really don't get why we even have time zones - they really aren't necessary. In Canada, we could go to work at 10:00am in the winter and 8:00am in the summer - we don't need to change the clocks, we just get up and do things at different times.

    I definitely would rather have more hours in the winter though. I really hate getting up in the morning (dark), working all day (gets light out later in the morning... I've already been at work for several hours in the dark). Then I get to watch the sun go down while I'm still at work, and drive home when its completely dark. It gets depressing quickly.. not seeing the sun for more than a few minutes per day.

    --
    You create your own reality - Leave mine to me.
  269. This is not all... by Uncertain+Bohr · · Score: 1

    A related bill is being discussed in Congress to also change the start and end dates of seasons. While most law makers Global Warming is still believed to be an unproven theory, they propose to change move the beginning of Summer to March 1st and the End of Summer to October 31st, which making the other 3 seasons correspondly smaller.
    This proposal aims at lessening the number of complains received from people complaining about how unreasonably hot the weather has become in the Spring and Fall seasons.

  270. New time system based on Sunrise by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

    It's time for a new time system. One that would always maximize the hours of daylight. Now that we have computers in our toasters and microwave ovens, we have the technology.
    Daytime and schedules will now be measured in hours/minutes/seconds since sunrise. There would still be time zones of 1 hour, so that everyone in the same timezone would be in sync. Most people would get up around sunrise. Most businesses would open 1 or 2 hours after sunrise.

    --
    All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    1. Re:New time system based on Sunrise by praxis · · Score: 1

      Man, that would suck for me, today where I live is not the shortest day of the year, and here's our sunrise and sunset times:

      Sunrise: 5:33
      Sunset: 20:57

      That's over fifteen hours of daylight. I hope my employer won't expect me to work longer in the summers.

    2. Re:New time system based on Sunrise by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

      Your work time would depend on you individual situation, but for most people would be the regular 8 hours. School children would be in school for the same amount of time, but wouldn't have to go to school in the dark.
      In your case, you'd have the last 7 hours of the day to yourself.

      --
      All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
  271. Alternate energies? by DoorFrame · · Score: 1

    It's nice to see the American government coming up with a solution like this instead of concentrating on and suggesting alternate energies.

    Uh, why can't it do both? What's the down side to attempting to decrease energy usage through a means that won't really affect many of us in a meaningful way?

  272. Canada? Try Indiana by ICLKennyG · · Score: 0

    Last time I checked Canada was about as high up on the lists of priorities as the IAFC. Not to sound like a bad neighbor... but really... If Canadiens don't like early daylight savings time, don't observe it. If you do like early daylight savings time, then observe it.
    Try moving to Indiana - then you will realize WTF daylight savings time is all about. Durring the last vote, the major reason was that the farmers said it would mess up the cows... Think about this for a second.... 'mess up the cows.' Whiskey-Tango-Foxtrot-OVER. Last time I checked the Cow's didn't wear watches. Pigs do; but they don't like the cows, so they won't tell them what's up. Additionally Wisconsin has about 50x as many cows as Indiana and they still observe DST.
    Everyone here is about down the middle - 50/50 (and most are very adiment about their opinion). I personally set my clocks ahead anyway. But I just know that people close an hour earlier than they say they will. I also respond with the added bonus 'your time' when someone asks me the time - that makes it fun when I tell them I am from the same place as them, but I choose to observe daylight savings time.

    read this article - 2 paragraphs - starting about the second one down. DST - WTF All I have to say is that the reason companies don't come here is not because companies are confused by times, it's because it's f@#k'n Indiana and there is jack squat else here... (Indianapolis is OK)

  273. Re:I think Canada should follow Saskatchewan's lea by Techguy666 · · Score: 1

    I think you've hit on several important points, DST is bad for several reasons. ...But what I'd be interested in seeing is if Canada opts not to follow suite with the US in implementing DST - and what it would mean to the economy... With stock markets in the States opening earlier than in Canada and closing earlier as well, investors would have a highly reliable crystal ball with which to make decisions... If the economy down south is showing a downward trend, Canadian investors will have an hour's warning time to respond. The chaos would eventually level off but it could create some pretty spectacular short-term profits...

  274. That's not true and you know it. by lorcha · · Score: 1
    I found the Spanish people to be particularly friendly and social. It's a friendly and laid-back country, and I really enjoyed it there. But why would Spanish people approach me, only to refuse to speak anything other than Spanish out of spite? That makes no sense.

    Spaniards will speak with you in any language you want--as long as it's Spanish.

    --
    "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
  275. DST is all backwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone pushes for DST for 'energy savings'. Consider this: DST pushes in the past have all been on the premise that this would save energy because people would use fewer lights.

    With the increase in central air, though, the primary power draw isn't light, but air. If the sun set earlier in the day, people would have less time at home where their air is fighting hot daytime temperatures.

    The right way to combat energy usage in the modern time is to END DST, keep year-round standard time, OR, go to reverse-DST, to add more daylight at the end of the day in the winter, to get passive solar help.

  276. DST all the time by Luyseyal · · Score: 1

    I hate switching between the two times. I'd prefer DST all the time or not at all.
    -l

    --
    Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
  277. Why have DST in the first place? by highlander76 · · Score: 1

    I never really liked having DST in the first place. Why not just adjust the time ahead 1/2 hour all the time and be done with it?

  278. Re:Use UTC by Soporific · · Score: 1

    The line was funny dude, not all humor has to follow the stringent truth guidelines of Fox News or Bush. Relax.

    ~S

  279. DST is nonsense by ab · · Score: 1

    Indiana, one of the few holdouts of DST has decided to start using it. They claim it's an energy saving issue and a business issue, and I'm not buying it.

    I'm sitting in a building full of offices. It is fantastically sunny today, but with few exceptions (myself being one), the are lit by electric lights. (Flourescents give me a headache, so I work by natural light as much as possible.)

    It matters not what time it is, or even if these people work a night shift instead of a day shift, the lights will be on when they're there, and, maybe, off when they're not.

    Observation tells me the same is true of most any business in an urban environment. Stores and restaurants are lighted based on occupancy, not time of day.

    Same thing's mostly true in homes. More electrical stuff is on when people are home and awake than when they aren't and time of day or amount of sunlight has little or nothing to do with it.

    In any case, changing from not using DST to using it can only (theoretically) make a difference in energy consumption for the part of the year that's different from current practice. If we switch to match Eastern time, that'd make us different in the summer, if we go Central (the preferred choice, I hear), we'd be different in the winter.

    If the winter part of DST is made shorter (and we go Central, as they're suggesting), we will save less energy than the amount we're supposed to be saving by switching to DST. Therefore, if energy savings is the reason, it's a bad idea.

    Not that I believe in the energy argument anyway, but less of however much is still less.

    The main reason some people want to get Indiana on DST is the "problem" of explaining what time it is here to businesses in other states. Guess what? Some of them are going to be in different timezones no matter what you do. If you really want to sync with people somewhere else, change your work hours.

    No one I talk to elsewhere really cares what time it is here, they just want to know when we're available for communication. They're going to put it on their calendars in their local time anyway.

    The other argument for DST is not one the lawmakers have been pushing (because they only want to talk about theoretically saving money) is the social one. That is, that people want to do things outdoors, outside of work, when the sun is up.

    That would make sense except that it doesn't. Civil twilight starts tonight (July 21) at 8:44 pm. It would be the same if we were on CDT. It would be 9:44 pm(!) if we were on EDT. So it's OK now, right?

    OK, so how about winter? On Christmas day, civil twilight starts at 5:57 pm (current time or EST). If we switch to CST, it'll be 4:57 pm(!). Is that better? Really?

    I used civil twilight rather than sunset because we're talking about people being outdoors. Sunset is about 30 minutes earlier.

  280. Re:Canada? Try Indiana by s20451 · · Score: 1

    I spent a year in South Bend. The best thing I can say for the place is that it's a short drive from Chicago.

    --
    Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
  281. Use seconds for everything! by LPetrazickis · · Score: 1

    Seconds are the standard SI unit of time. We should forget about crap like minutes, hours, and the likes and switch to a pure seconds-based system.

    There are 86.4 kiloseconds in a day. However, we are not farmers. Day and night don't matter. We should make 100 kiloseconds the standard length of a sleep-wakefulness cycle. My body always wants to stay up for an extra three hours and I pay for it in the morning. With an extra 3.8 standard hours in a "day", we'd be able to stay up longer and sleep in every time.

    Certain shorthands will disappear when we switch to seconds, kiloseconds, and megaseconds, but others will arise to take their place. Long-term durations and short-term durations will become much easier to relate to each other.

    So...

    - Replace days with periods of 100 kiloseconds for an extra 3.8 hours of fun and rest
    - Replace weeks with periods of 10 megaseconds. A weekend can last 300 kiloseconds (or more). w00t!
    - Have New Years-style parties every 100 megaseconds. Sweeeeeeet.:)
    - Forget the damn astrological bs of days, months, and years. What has the moon ever done for you? Nothing! Then why should you give a damn about it? It's easier to just do everything in seconds.:)

    --
    Is this a sigs-optional kind of place? 'Cause I am totally down with that if you know what I mean.
  282. What Canadians can do about the DST issue by WebCowboy · · Score: 1

    DST policy is the domain of provincial governments, and in some cases municpalities can even go their own route (such as those like Lloyminster which straddles the AB/SK border, or the Pace region of BC). Your best bet is to write your MLA/MPP/MNA or petition your provincial legislature.

    There was an article about this in the newspaper and it seems Canadians were caught very off-guard about the idea--there was no consultation with Canada OR Mexico on this decision even though it would affect us very much. To do this change would be very expensive and in some cases dangerous due to the complexity and confusion in coordinating this kind of change--and IMO the benefits are small to nonexistent--especially for residents in more northern locales.

    If we stay with DST as it is now regardless of what the US does, it would be the cheapest solution in the short-term, but the ongoing confusion due to being one hour off in some direction two months of the year in addition to the annoyance of still changing the clocks twice a year would be costly in the long run.

    Therefore I think if the US goes ahead with this silly scheme it would be the perfect opportunity for Canada to abolish DST entirely. We would no longer have to make sure all our clocks have been changed, and since automated systems already support disabling DST the cost of the change would be minimal. Long term, it would simplify business (payroll and other time-sensitive systems won't have to use the added complexity). If the US does indeed go forward with this change I urge all Canadians to petition their governments to abolish DST.

  283. Why not more? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

    I'd propose to add three months instead of two. This would save another month of daylight. And while at it, just add two months at the beginning as well. Also, to simplify remembering the day, set the start of DST to the first day of the month, and the end of DST to the last (so a month is either completely DST, or not at all). Doing all those, DST will start at Jan 1, and end at Dec 31. Now just let it start at the beginning of Jan 1, and end at the end of Dec 31. This will simplify DST, as you have only to remember one time, where you set the clock back, and immediatly undo that operation. Of course you could also simply note that this combination is a no-op anyway and skip it completely. :-)

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  284. You don't imagine well by WebCowboy · · Score: 1

    I imagine they can deal with it.

    For traders in Vancouver BC, the situation is barley tolerable as it is--they start work when the market opens--in TORONTO AND NEW YORK. So while all those people in the east have until 9AM to get going, those poor Vancouverites have to be up, at work and ready to go at SIX IN THE MORNING. If the US changes DST and Candad doesn't do so immediately, that means their day starts at FIVE in the morning for a month every spring. Furthermore, many traders typically have to do some kind of business until the close of business--on the WEST coast. Vancouverites are so close to Washington state that they'd probably have to work an hour LATER for a month in the fall until the US changes back to standard time.

    I'm thinking now that if the proponents of DST think that the longer DST is the more energy it saves and the better it is for everyone, why should we bother having "standard" time at all--just make DST the standard and leave our clocks alone from now on? Personally, I'd appreciate that the most--in Decemnber it is pitch black by the time I leave the office--if there was not clock switching and DST was year 'round at least I'd be able to see the sun go down form HOME for more of the year.

  285. Smokey Bear by cpeterso · · Score: 1


    His name is Smokey Bear, not Smokey the Bear. "Smokey the Bear" is a popular song written in 1952 by Steve Nelson and Jack Rollins. The subject is Smokey Bear. According to the Forest Service's Smokey Bear website, a "the" was added to keep the song's rhythm.

  286. Re:Sweden did this a few years ago... by CoCoshuq · · Score: 1

    ...as did several other EU nations. Even though -as a Swede- I appreciate the (mostly unwarranted) praise, I fail to see the impact your nationality would have on applying OS patches. The patches that worked for us should for for the US, unless your weird and mysterious software laws perform their usual voodoo, of course.

  287. Use siderial time by suitti · · Score: 1
    In the 1800's, the train schedules were printed using the siderial time at each stop. Since siderial time is differant for each location, you couldn't subtract two times to find out how long it took to get from one station to the next.

    But now we have electronics to perform arithmetic. Further, we have GPS, which can tell you where you are to high precision. Combining these allows you to have a sideral time watch that keeps up with the time zone continuously. The whole computation problem goes away (is taken care of) and siderial time just works.

    Alternative, cheaper technology for a wristwatch is the FlintStones style sun dial. Hard to get the microsecond accuracy available from GPS, but probably good enough for those on a budget.

    --
    -- Stephen.
  288. Re: sunny bono daylight extension act by arbitraryaardvark · · Score: 1

    Perhaps, mr skeptic, I can interest you in the Sono Bono Daylight Savings extension act (SBDSea.)
    The act will extend daylight savings time year round.

  289. Re:That link needs registration-here's the story t by leonardluen · · Score: 1

    "Upton estimates the move will save the country $360 million (U.S.) for the extra 60 days that daylight time will be in effect"

    my god, they are seriously doing this for a mere $360million in energy? seriously, that is pocket change! to put it in perspective it will be saving each american about $1 per year...

  290. Microsoft library file - MSVCRT.DLL by RetiredFed · · Score: 1
    If the new daylight law is enacted, it seems that that the only thing in Windows that needs to be changed is the Visual C++ library file, MSVCRT.DLL. This doesn't mean that everyone would upload the patch though.

    This was the file at center of the April 01 2001 daylight savings time snafu. See the links below:

    http://www.langa.com/newsletters/1999/jan-18-99.ht m

    Microsoft's Unintentional April's Fool's Bug

    http://www.cknow.com/articles/62/1/Computer-Knowle dge-Newsletter-Archive---1999/print/62

    http://www.rescomp.upenn.edu/docs/hype/old/aprilon e.html

  291. Not really by lorcha · · Score: 1

    Daylight Saving Time is in the summer when there is plenty of daylight to make it home in time already.

    --
    "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
  292. You obviously by lorcha · · Score: 1

    have no children.

    --
    "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
  293. Uhh... dude... by lorcha · · Score: 1

    How many extra IT workers does it take to update zone files which are automatically updated?

    --
    "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
  294. Score... by Deitheres · · Score: 1

    Score yourself at home

    This is slashdot... I'm sure many people reading this frequently "score" {with} themselves at home.

    --
    Just like driving a car:
    (D) to go forward
    (R) to go backward

  295. You realize that it ain't so in many part of the w by aepervius · · Score: 1

    For example France : "Le denier du cult" relate to the money give as alm during church (if I recall correctly). Furthermore in many part of the world, the main difference between a cult and a church by legal definition is the NUMBER of follower.

    As for "mandate that people think for themselves, to always think clearly and rationally and not act on mere impulse or emotion" well I would like to know where you pull that out. I would think of a certain party of the body. Usually for christianism the precept are given hammer-like without questionning, and a single authoritative figure (ex: the pope) can questionesly decide something which then will more or less be valid to any fervent catholic (example : putting the preservative at the "index"). Faith is NOT to be questionned. This is heresy. Remmember the inquisition ? Posing the wrong question could lead you to be burned alive. Even today it can lead you to be stoned in certain part of the world, and it certainly can lead you to be shuned or worst in the western part of the world. Typically if you want to avoid question you just say "God made me do it" or "God told me".


    Please do not make any religion as an entertaining educating experience where people can ask a lot of wonderful question. This is an untruth historically, and even now on so many level that it is difficult to know where to begin with... Religion in general force a certain type of locked "answer/precept" and does not allow any questionning aside what lead to those answer. You are comfunding with science or moral or philosophy.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org