Slashdot Mirror


Good, Affordable PC Diagnostic Software?

RebornData asks: "I do freelance computer support for small businesses, and after running into a string of hairy hardware problems, decided to buy some generic PC diagnostic software. My searches turned up numerous vendors but very few independent or reputable reviews and comparisons, so I embarked on an evaluation of my own. What I found was an industry filled with con artists, bitter feuds, and outdated products. I'm now out $400 and am wondering whether my hope of finding useful diagnostic software was a naive dream. Has anyone found something that works for you?"

"The premise of PC diagnostics software is simple: provide an easy way to test for PC hardware problems, independent of software configuration. Some hardware vendors (like Dell) provide diagnostics with their systems, but they are usually model-specific and not even all major vendors provide them. Of course there are free utilities like the well-known memtest86, but I was wanted something more comprehensive.

So I started my research, and found a variety of packages, including PC Doctor, PC Check, Microscope, PC Certify, Tufftest Pro, among many others, ranging in price from $500 to $35. Some come with associated hardware, such as loopback connectors for parallel, serial, network or USB ports, or ISA / PCI cards that will show low-level POST codes for machines that appear completely dead.

Some of the vendors provided demos, but most were severely crippled. The cheaper software tended to be outdated and incomplete, lacking support for newer hardware features. Almost all practiced high-pressure sales tactics over the phone, and I discovered that one company was actually a spinoff of another by a disgruntled former employee, resulting in a bitter, lawsuit-ridden feud.

Microscope, by Micro 2000, seemed to have the most online feedback, mostly positive, but they didn't provide a demo. After contacting their sales, they suggested that if I bought a full copy for my evaluation, I could return it in 30 days if it didn't meet my needs. Well, it turned out to be buggy and missing important features found in other, cheaper products. When I called to return the product, the salesman disclaimed all knowledge of the promise they made, and they've refused to take it back. Some further digging found that I'm not the first person to be taken in by these tactics.

I still would like to find worthwhile PC diagnostics software, but the (a) lack of independent reviews, (b) shady industry sales tactics and (c) poor performance of a 'well regarded' package leave me wondering... am I a sucker for buying into the whole concept in the first place? Can anyone point me towards a reputable vendor, or an alternative set of independent tools that will do the same job?"

512 comments

  1. Sandra by mekkab · · Score: 5, Informative

    SiSoft's Sandra is good for some basic hardware info on the machine.
    It was nice finding out that the RAM I bought from Coast-to-Coast memory that I got a "deal" on was actually a step down in terms of speed (which they were selling for the "sale" price...so it all worked out).

    They have diagnosit tests, but I've only used the free version. But its a nice first-line strategy for sizing up machines.

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    1. Re:Sandra by cs02rm0 · · Score: 2, Redundant

      I can't stand sisoft sandra, for a variety of reasons. It reminds me of norton software with that bloaty feel.

      I prefer AIDA32.

    2. Re:Sandra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Uhhhh, the OP did.

      But, I'd have to agree with the comment about Sandra. Bloated, Slow, not very much fun to work with in terms of speed, though it is actually a pretty good product. At least the free version is.

    3. Re:Sandra by Nintendork · · Score: 5, Informative
      I've ordered a good amount of memory from Coast to Coast. I've saved a lot of money for my friends/family/clients, especially when it comes to SODIMMs (Laptop memory) and router memory. I don't buy their memory because it's the best. I buy from them because I've only had one compatibility issue (Which was promptly resolved) and the price/performance ratio is tremendously in their favor. The relative running Windows XP on 128MB of RAM is in heaven when they get an additional stick thrown in, regardless of how fast it is. Before the upgrade they were running 1000 times slower on the pagefile!

      Going back on topic, let me share what I've learned about troubleshooting hardware issues. First, let me stress that it's usually not a hardware issue. Drivers, resource conflicts, and buggy BIOS/Firmware code is usually the issue. When it comes to "diagnostic" software for real hardware problems, there's little you can do. For memory, there's MemTest-86. This program hasn't failed to spot bad memory for me yet. For hard drives, go to the manufacturer's web site to get a bootable diagnostic floppy. Usually the quick tests are all that's needed, but it could pay off to do the extended test if the quick one says everything's OK. Even if the extended test comes back fine, don't rule out the drive. The problem could be intermittent. For the rest of the hardware, simply swap components around until you narrow it down. Take out that video card and toss in a spare one that you've had for several years and know works. For the CPU, toss in any other CPU that matches the original's architecture (Just a different speed rating is OK). I think you get the idea on the (Swapping out) method. Also, never underestimate the crap a poor power supply unit (PSU) can throw at you! Stability issues could be coming from an unreliable current. Of course, temperature problems could also cause these same stability issues, but that's much easier to monitor. When you get to a point where you're truly stumped, some manufacturers have forums that you can go to for help. This is especially true in the homebuilt market with Abit, VIA, AMD, etc.

      Good luck and happy hunting!

      -Lucas

    4. Re:Sandra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not surprised you got shafted by Coast the Coast. I had a very miserable experience with them. I recommend folks avoid them like the plague.

    5. Re:Sandra by aminorex · · Score: 1

      I enjoyed and appreciated your comments, but
      I must take exception to the phrase "bootable
      floppy" which has been an oxymoron in my house
      since 1998. I haven't found an actual use for
      the dusty floppy disks or drives in my closet,
      but perhaps "bootable" images can (I confess my
      ignorance) be burned onto a CD somehow, in
      order to boot them?

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    6. Re:Sandra by Nintendork · · Score: 3, Informative
      Good point! MemTest-86 also comes on bootable CD. I should also mention that it's licensed under the GPL (FREE!!!!). :)

      Also, you can always make a bootable CD from a bootable floppy using most CD burning programs assuming you have one floppy drive somewhere that you could use for the transformation. Here's a good article I found on doing this.

      -Lucas

    7. Re:Sandra by Nintendork · · Score: 1
      "Also, you can always make a bootable CD from a bootable floppy using most CD burning programs assuming you have one floppy drive somewhere that you could use for the transformation."

      I'm a dork. You don't even need a floppy drive to do this. *grin*

      -Lucas

    8. Re:Sandra by dreamt · · Score: 4, Informative
      As far as boot floppies, memtestx86, hard drive diagnostics, etc, I would send you to Bart's Boot Disk Creation site (the one mentioned the other day here for their Windows boot disk) and look into their "corporate boot disk" routine, especially the boot CD part of it. I heavily modified this (to allow the network and CD-rom to co-exist) and added things like hard drive diag tools from all of the major vendors (some were easier than others, some insisted on creating ISO images, so I need to mount that ISO, then extract their utils, etc). It already includes support for memtestx86, and I also added the off-line NT password editor (you can select multiple boot images, so just needed to add the linux one mentioned on other part of the site.

      It also uses some cygwin tools (dd, etc) to make it so that you can create a bootable CD by emulating the creation of a boot floppy via DD, so you can create one w/o the need for an actual floppy (I would recommend hacking it to create 2.88MB floppies rather than 1.44 MB floppies (need to search its config files to handle this)

    9. Re:Sandra by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      Of course, manufacturer's diagnostics don't necessarily work either.

      I have a Dell 2400 (bought for the kids). The on-board ethernet (Broadcom 440) was giving me a problem. The Win32 based Broadcom-specific diagnostic suite told me the ethernet memory buffer wa s failing. Dell needed a diagnostic code from their standard diagnostics. However, all their ResourceCD diagnostic tested was the EEPROM, which tested out fine. I'm still fighting with them over the RMA.

      Oh, and by dropping in a $15 Realtek card, I demonstrated (to my satisfaction, at least) that all the network problems I was seeing were due to the failure of the onboard ethernet.

      Upshot: even the vaunted manufacturer provided diags aren't that hot (though the Broadcom BACS worked nicely).

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    10. Re:Sandra by returnoftheyeti · · Score: 2, Informative

      Norton makes it easy to create a bootable CD form a bootable Floopy. Just insert the floppy, a blank CD in the burner. Then when Nero starts up choose "Bootable CD". Click the check box next to emulate Floppy and you are good to go.

    11. Re:Sandra by Cramer · · Score: 4, Informative

      [memtest86] Let me send you my IProc PC-100 SDRAM DIMM... the idiots put the wrong timing values in it's SPD. I've only found one machine, ever, to work properly with that damn thing. Tyan MB's tend to lock as soon as the POST is complete. Memtest86 ran for 7 days and could not find a problem with the DIMM.

      [hard drive diag floppy] I just returned two Maxtor drives that passed multiple "extended" tests with their diag utils. BOTH have entire tracks that aren't readable -- sector mark not found... they aren't there anymore.

      Just because it passed a limited set of tests doesn't mean it's not broken.

    12. Re:Sandra by Nintendork · · Score: 1
      "Tyan MB's tend to lock as soon as the POST is complete. Memtest86 ran for 7 days and could not find a problem with the DIMM."

      Bullshit. If it locks as soon as POST is complete, memtest-86 wouldn't even start since the computer would be locked. If you really want to send me the memory, email me at lucasz@hotmail.com.

      I just returned two Maxtor drives that passed multiple "extended" tests with their diag utils. BOTH have entire tracks that aren't readable -- sector mark not found... they aren't there anymore.

      That's how hard drives work. When parts of the disk are bad, it marks them as such and doesn't use them. Besides, didn't I say that you can't trust a disk 100% just because it passes the extended test? You were right in returning them since they were new. Drives should only develop bad sectors after lots of use.

      -Lucas

    13. Re:Sandra by Nintendork · · Score: 1
      lol, Interesting mixup you got there. Norton sucks, Nero rox0rs.

      -Lucas

    14. Re:Sandra by BiggyP · · Score: 1

      Sandra's ok for basic stuff, and isn't it also "free" in it's standard edition form?, but is there anything like the Central point tools and Checkit of old.

    15. Re:Sandra by Nintendork · · Score: 1
      The network chipset is Broadcom, the vendor is dell. You were right to use the Broadcom diagnostic utility to determine that it crapped out. The Dell rep you spoke with is forced to only use the Dell utilities which aren't as thorough as the manufacturer provided utilities. Just call in and make a huge fuss explaining in layman's terms what you did to determine that it's the onboard NIC that's causing issues. Make a huge squeak and you'll get your greasing.

      -Lucas

    16. Re:Sandra by Cramer · · Score: 1

      I said "tends to lock"... DOS, oddly enough, usually would boot.

      It's hard to mark a sector bad when it isn't there. In fact, the entire track was gone -- magnetically detroyed from a write-during-power-failure (firmware buglet.) That stuff is stored on the media, ya' know. The diags intentionally disable remapping before initiating a surface scan. SMART counted the errors, but the application failed to report them and proceeded to declare the drive "A OK". They were 2 years old -- 3 year warrantee. Maxtor replaced them without question even without a coveted diag result code.

    17. Re:Sandra by berzerke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I too have seen memtest fail to find bad memory, but only once so far. (I switched out memory and since then, no problems.) Also keep in mind, that due to the way it works, memtest errors could be power supply, motherboard, or CPU related in addition to memory related.

      I've also seen the hd tests fail to spot a hard drive that was bad too. I spent over a week on one of them trying to figure out why it kept having problems. Since it was in my possession, I didn't have to worry out the cleaning crew causing the problem (see this story under neat idea..)

      I've come to the conclusion that there is NO test that can say if the hardware is good, only tests that can say its bad. Between memtest and knoppix (and the hd tests), I can USUALLY spot faulty hardware quickly, but every so often..GRRRR

      BTW, I haven't seen it mentioned yet, but the ultimate boot CD (free!) contains lots of useful tools all on one CD. These include memtest, and the various hd manufacturer's tests.

    18. Re:Sandra by rizzo420 · · Score: 1

      while this method would be fine for one system, it's a time consuming method. from what i could tell by reading the original question is that he wants something that he could easily do several computers relatively quickly (at least more quickly than swapping out all the hardware with stuff you know "works". you know... as far as i know, everything in my machine works just fine, if i were to take it out, and replace it with something, i would still assume it works find if i put it back in, but over time, it could get to the point where it doesn't work anymore. and while it's nice to just go to the manufacturers website for the diagnostic tools, you have a whole bunch of different hardware, and god only knows what is in each machine that you work on. might be easier to have a nice program that checks all this stuff.

      but i do agree that your method is graet if it's just your own personal computer.

      --
      please me, have no regrets.
    19. Re:Sandra by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2, Insightful
      For memory, there's MemTest-86 [memtest86.com]. This program hasn't failed to spot bad memory for me yet.

      How would you know?
      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    20. Re:Sandra by mousehorne · · Score: 1

      A good tool that we use is called PC Sentry Plus (http://www.trinitech.biz). It cost about $300 I think but it is great for diagnosing computers that have an error during the startup BIOS process. The card plugs into a PCI or ISA slot and displays a HEX code of what the BIOS is doing in real time and when it hangs you can see what the HEX code is and look it up in the book that comes with it and see what is causing the problem. Saves a lot of time in swapping out cables and hardware when trying to find the culprit. They also sell a boot disk with some memory and hard drive testing utilities but I don't know how good they are.

    21. Re:Sandra by i621148 · · Score: 1

      devcon download
      this is the microsoft devcon package
      type devcon driverfiles >> driverfiles.txt
      to get a good list of information

      type DEVCON Help for other goodies you can do

    22. Re:Sandra by i621148 · · Score: 1

      sorry forgot to preview the link.
      devcon download

    23. Re:Sandra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      As a struggling computer scientist student I know that it is ALWAYS a hardware problem.

    24. Re:Sandra by Woody · · Score: 2, Funny

      Because EVERY piece of memory he's EVER TESTED has come back BAD.

      Call me Zippy. I couldn't resist.

    25. Re:Sandra by WayneConrad · · Score: 3, Informative

      At least as it's packaged in Debian, memtest86 has a binary image you can just add to your lilo.conf so you can pick it when you boot. Neither a floppy nor a CD is needed.

    26. Re:Sandra by returnoftheyeti · · Score: 1

      wow, I am a dumbass. How did he get modded up to a 2 and I am stuck at a 1.

      MODS help me.

    27. Re:Sandra by Nintendork · · Score: 1
      Good point. I guess I know because all the people I've built computers for are in touch with me and all of them have extremely stable systems. Not a whole lot of people, but there's at least three dozen systems out there. Add onto that two or three routers, a couple RAID cards, two servers that require unusual memory modules, and another dozen or two workstations that got memory upgrades.

      Some branded memory I purchased through CDW failed memtest. I replaced it with another brand and was fine. An IBM server had two different designs not designated in the model number. At first, I got the wrong type of memory and it failed. Also, I've mixed all sorts of crap memory in my home systems and found out which combinations worked using memtest.

      I guess I can say that I'm highly confident that memtest hasn't failed me yet.

      -Lucas

    28. Re:Sandra by Nintendork · · Score: 1
      I should warn that the following applies to the Windows world since that's where my work and the majority of my experience is. I would say that the Macintosh could be added to the section where the NT family is mentioned (Replace "services" and "drivers" with Macintosh "INIT"s) and I don't know enough about the various *NIX flavors to provide much insight.

      "from what i could tell by reading the original question is that he wants something that he could easily do several computers relatively quickly (at least more quickly than swapping out all the hardware with stuff you know 'works'...might be easier to have a nice program that checks all this stuff."

      I guess I didn't provide a direct answer to the question. My stance is this: How can you trust that any one software package is going to be able to reproduce every event for every combination and feature of every piece of hardware out there? Maintaining such a program is close to impossible. Compare that to the medical industry and you can see many parallels. Some treatments work for some patients, but not others and the ones it works on happen at different degrees of effectiveness. We're all unique just like how there's got to be a few billion possible triggers for a hardware malfunction.

      _Most_ of the time, a real hardware failure is obvious and easy to pinpoint with an educated guess using a little past experience. You can then confirm that theory by swapping parts. Again, I say most of the time because there are exceptions. But in most (Maybe 95%) cases when troubleshooting a flakey computer, it's a software problem. Windows 9x/ME are a lost cause because they are the worst pieces of crap for an OS ever created. If it's the NT family, it's usually a driver, service, or resource conflict (From a crappy PCI device) causing issues. In these cases, an all in one diagnostic utility issn't going to help since it's not a hardware problem to begin with.

      -Lucas

    29. Re:Sandra by sshore · · Score: 1
      [hard drive diag floppy] I just returned two Maxtor drives that passed multiple "extended" tests with their diag utils. BOTH have entire tracks that aren't readable -- sector mark not found... they aren't there anymore.

      It's because of automatic sector relocation. All modern drives do it. When a bad sector is identified, it is marked as such, and the next write to that sector is mapped into a certain number of reserved sectors.

      Ideally this process happens when the sector is weak, not bad, and the correct data can be copied over into the new sector without waiting for a write. But when the drive is going south quickly, the weak sectors may not be identified until they're actually bad.

      The diagnostic program often has a feature to wipe the desk, or something like that. This triggers the automatic sector relocation, and subsequent scans will show the disk as clean.

      As far as i can tell, grc.com's SpinRite takes advantage of this feature with the "Disk Exercizer" option, which reads and rewrites each of the sectors. Too bad it only works with dos or windows-formatted partitions.

    30. Re:Sandra by Cramer · · Score: 1

      Maxtor's diag tools disable read reallocation (and write reallocation) as step one. No drive will remap a read if the read actually FAILED. If it can read the sector, but with problems (it had to retry, ECC was called for, etc.) THEN it can reallocate the sector. Otherwise, data would be randomly corrupted WITHOUT NOTICE.

      I wasn't performing write tests or a "low-level format" (which isn't a low-level format, btw. -- takes special tools to make an IDE drive do that.)

    31. Re:Sandra by rizzo420 · · Score: 1

      what i would think of as an all-in-one diagnostic utility is somethig that checks for bad drivers or resource conflicts. if it just tells you the hardware works fine, that's great, but it doesn't tell you the problem and then it can become a guessing game.

      video cards are generally an easy thing since (at lesat older PC's) computers won't boot without a video card (might be different now, that was my experience with my machine, still use that machine all the time). the other stuff is a little more tricky. i realize you can't always have all the stuff there (whcih is what patches are for and the patches would also remove support for some more ancient hardware).

      --
      please me, have no regrets.
    32. Re:Sandra by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      Maybe you were unclear or I missed a clue in there, but !! $300 !!, I've got a post code card and it didn't cost me $30. (and it comes with a cabe and spare display). unless yours is single stepping/traceing the bios or some such?

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    33. Re:Sandra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      try pc mechanic by iolo. www.iolo.com

    34. Re:Sandra by sirsnork · · Score: 1

      Actually these days you'll want to use memtest86+ since it's current and is regularly updated

      --

      Normal people worry me!
    35. Re:Sandra by Xabraxas · · Score: 1

      That's pretty cool. Gentoo's LiveCD has memtest as one of its boot options and I can't tell you how many times that LiveCD has come in handy.

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    36. Re:Sandra by zeno_2 · · Score: 1

      Im a fan of Sisoft Sandra, I used to do tech support over the phone kinda deal, and in the crazier problems we would use it. It may feel bloaty (ive never thought that) but it gives you *a lot* of good information that you can use to troubleshoot the problem. I haven't had that job for the past couple years so there may be better ones out there, but it would be the first thing I downloaded if I needed somethin like that.

    37. Re:Sandra by jangell · · Score: 1

      I am an in-store repair tech for Best Buy (store 14 rochester, mn) . We used a software package called PC Certify. I've had a lot of experiance with it and as far as locating hardware problems it is quite sucessful.

      In all the time that I've ran it, Only once did it not detect a hardware problem when the ram was faulty. Every other time It's been great at locating ram, motherboard, processor, and hard drive issues.

      I would highly reccomend it to anyone who is dealing with diagonsing computers. It's great for the hardware side of things.

      As far as the price of it, I wouldn't know.

    38. Re:Sandra by FreakWent · · Score: 1

      Hardware Dual PCI/ISA card with diagnostics LED display.

      It works even when the PC won't POST and just bleeps. Or not even!

      $40 Australian at the local computer markets, v. useful for recycling old crap people threw out 'coz they got the jumpers all jumbled up.

    39. Re:Sandra by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > Going back on topic, let me share what I've learned about troubleshooting
      > hardware issues. First, let me stress that it's usually not a hardware issue.

      Ah, I see that you use Windows.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    40. Re:Sandra by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 1

      When parts of the disk are found to be bad at the factory, they are marked as such. You're talking about dynamic defect management, which is not what the page you linked to describes. Magneto-optical drives and the new Mount Rainier CD/DVD re-writers do this, but I've not heard of it being implemented in hard drives.

  2. Low Cost by derphilipp · · Score: 5, Informative

    A low-cost alternative is a bootable copy of Knoppix, escpecially usefull if equipped with a virus scanner - like
    http://www.linuxforum.com/linux_wallpapers_full/ 93.php>Knopicillin - sorry no ISO Image found - it was once in the C'T magazine...

    --
    Spelling mistakes: My is english spoken not tongue of mother.
    1. Re:Low Cost by etnoy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I totally agree. And the Gentoo LiveCDs all contain the excellent mentest86 program (type memtest on the boot command line) And also, the ISO is a lot smaller than the knoppix one (if you choose the bare-scraped one you'll just need 60 megs of downloading)

      --
      Quantum hacker.
    2. Re:Low Cost by betelgeuse-4 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I know that Knoppix has excellent hardware detection (for a Linux distro at least), but how good is it diagnosing problems with hardware?

    3. Re:Low Cost by mausmaki · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      That's nice. So you have 60MB on a 650MB cd instead of 650MB.

    4. Re:Low Cost by B'Trey · · Score: 2

      If you have skinny pipes, it will take you a couple of hours rather than a couple of days to download.

      --

      "The legitimate powers of government extend only to such acts as are injurious to others." Thomas Jefferson.

    5. Re:Low Cost by thelasttemptation · · Score: 1

      cdrws...

    6. Re:Low Cost by sdaug · · Score: 3, Funny

      LiveCDs all contain the excellent mentest86 program

      mentest? I'm sure there's lots of good uses for that one...

    7. Re:Low Cost by Chep · · Score: 3, Informative

      Uhhh... no.

      CDRW's don't boot in every CD-ROM player in existence. If you know you will be restricted to modern enough CD-ROM drives, fine, but if you want the broadest support, you have to burn on CD-R (even if you have to consider them as disposable items)

    8. Re:Low Cost by hackstraw · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If it can't get the hardware to work correctly, there must be a problem. In my experience, its difficult to tell the difference between a software and hardware problem on a windows machine because there are just strange app crashes. Whereas if there is _any_ problem with a linux machine, I assume its hardware. Also, the drivers in linux are much more verbose when they have a problem.

    9. Re:Low Cost by dJCL · · Score: 1, Informative

      I used knoppix and it's variants to recover about 180Gig of data just in the last week.

      Another one I've found is the BartPE that was here the other day. I build one from a Win2k3 server install disk and tested it, it works reasonable well considering it's a hack ontop of a hack...

      The true utility of BartPE is the 3rd party(non-ms and non-bartpe) utils that can be added to it for recovery, AV and cleanup purposes.

      Of course, I was rather amazed that it found my network card... but oh well.

      Try BartPE if you have to troubleshoot windows systems, you might like it.

      http://www.nu2.nu/pebuilder/

      --
      On Arrakis: early worm gets the bird. Magister mundi sum!
    10. Re:Low Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      CDRW's don't boot in every CD-ROM player in existence. If you know you will be restricted to modern enough CD-ROM drives, fine, but if you want the broadest support, you have to burn on CD-R (even if you have to consider them as disposable items)

      People still use CDRW's? CD-R's are so cheap now I just consider it a throwaway item. If I want to burn 20 megs or 600 megs I'll just throw it on a CD-R. They're only a few cents each and I've got spools of hundreds of them accumulated throughout the years.

    11. Re:Low Cost by moonbender · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, if download speed is any issue, the bootable memtest86 cd image is 62,5 kilobytes compressed - a bit too large for manual transcription, but anything above that should be fine. So if you only want memtest86, by all means don't get a full-scale Linux Live CD.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    12. Re:Low Cost by The+Original+Yama · · Score: 1

      There are many tools which come with today's GNU/Linux distributions that can be used to test hardware. Knoppix and LiveCD distros are useful for their portability. Full-blown distros can be even more useful due to the sheer breadth of tools that they contain. GNU/Linux drivers and tools can usually be made to output large volumes of information on what they're doing and what they've found. Being open source, they can be more fully understood. Tools can be combined to perform all sorts of tasks and tests.

      I have used The Linux Hardware Stability Guide at IBM DeveloperWorks (Part 1 | Part 2) to test and tweak a number of systems. I have found the best stress testers to be a looped kernel compilation, cpuburn and Memtest86. Mprime is good as well.

    13. Re:Low Cost by shadow303 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That is of course assuming that there is a compatible linux driver for the hardware in question. If it's not supported, it won't work whether it is broken or not. It is also possible for there to be intermittent problems that won't be detected by such a cursory test.

      --
      I've got a mind like a steel trap - it's got an animal's foot stuck in it.
    14. Re:Low Cost by monique · · Score: 1

      Considering how cheap CD-Rs are and how prevalent reusable storage devices are (usb keychain drives, for example), why would you ever use CD-RWs?

      Not trying to criticize; I guess I just don't get it.

      --
      -monique
    15. Re:Low Cost by umeboshi · · Score: 1

      --- Considering how cheap CD-Rs are and how prevalent reusable storage devices are (usb keychain drives, for example), why would you ever use CD-RWs?

      testing remastered live-cd's, I have a small stack
      of unbootable cd-r's

    16. Re:Low Cost by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      "Also, the drivers in linux are much more verbose when they have a problem."

      As in you actually *get* diagnostics and log messages.

      M$ Windows truly sucks in this regard.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    17. Re:Low Cost by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --The 185MB - 210MB 3-inch mini CDR's are good for smaller burns. That way you don't have to "waste" the rest of the space on the CDR.

      --I've even seen mini-DVD-R media, but it's kinda expensive ATM.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    18. Re:Low Cost by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --cdrw's are good to have around when you're testing something that you haven't done before and isn't considered "finalized" yet. That way you don't waste WORM CDR's - the bad burns get re-used.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    19. Re:Low Cost by Chep · · Score: 1

      Well; most USB devices are still not bootable; a CD (R or RW) is (to the extent I explained above: a CD-R is more broadly bootable than a CD-RW, though depending on the vintage of the PCs you typically encounter, this can be only of marginal relevance).

      There is a point to use CD-RWs, if you want to always have a fresh bootable LiveCD system, and keep updating it every other day. In that case, hell yeah a CD-RW makes sense. I, for one, burn a new LiveCD CD-R when I just can't find the previous one, or when it's really hopelessy too old. Burned about 5 or 8 in 2 years [counting Debian "netinst" disks as poor man's LiveCD, pre-Knoppix].

    20. Re:Low Cost by Technonotice_Dom · · Score: 1
      As in you actually *get* diagnostics and log messages.
      M$ Windows truly sucks in this regard.
      Sure does... I've got a dual monitor system using a GeForce 4 and a salvaged ATI Rage II card. X probed them fine and set it up no problems - I tweaked the XF86Config file to suit my setup (one CRT, one TFT) and all was well.

      XP on the other hand... just bleats that the "Device would not start" on the ATI card and gives in ;-)

      Geez...!
    21. Re:Low Cost by monique · · Score: 1

      Yeah. My usage is pretty similar to what you describe, so using CD-RWs doesn't make a ton of sense to me.

      Actually, I recently ran into a boot issue (lilo.conf pointing to the wrong location for the kernel file; doh!), and for some reason the latest Knoppix gave me permissions guff when I tried to use lilo. My trusty ol' Debian netinst CD, on the other hand, worked like a charm.

      --
      -monique
    22. Re:Low Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. I have successfully run Knoppix previously on pc's that crash with XP. It great to rule out hardware faults in these cases.

    23. Re:Low Cost by sheapshearer · · Score: 3, Funny

      I used knoppix and it's variants to recover about 180Gig of data just in the last week.

      That's a lot of pr0n!

    24. Re:Low Cost by dJCL · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Nah, less then a Gig of pron, I either don't keep it around or put it on CD more reliably then the other stuff.

      About 80Gig of *** files, 10Gig was all of *** *****, 15Gig was all of ***** ******, 20Gig was a lot of ****** ***, 10Gig was some of *******, add in some ***** and some ******, maybe a few gigs of *-***** and you have my collection of random stuff...(sorry, gotta watch out for people out to get me, the *'s are not replacing any version of the idea of porn...)

      And then the oil fired water heater decides to have a fit, throws a lot of soot in to the air, gums up an already meta-stable system and bang... 3 hard drive are in varied states of disrepair...

      I really think now that the "-S" switch to mkfs.ext3 should be labeled the "last chance before you give up, so you might as well use it" option, it worked where fsck, tune2fs and debugfs could not...

      Anyway...

      --
      On Arrakis: early worm gets the bird. Magister mundi sum!
  3. Since you mentioned Dell by watzinaneihm · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you like dell diagnostics, then you should probably buy PCdoctor. Atleast some of the diagnostics in the earlier versions of Dell servers were sublicensed from PCdoctor. Just go into the installation folder and liik at the DLL names, or read a config file.

    --
    .ACMD setaloiv siht gnidaeR
    1. Re:Since you mentioned Dell by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      Dell's diags don't really work that well.

      If you can use the device manufacturer's diags, that's better.

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    2. Re:Since you mentioned Dell by FireBird615 · · Score: 1

      Dell Engineering is set to release much more accurate diagnostics sometime in 2004, probably late Summer, early Fall.

      These diagnostics will do a much better job of detecting specific hardware failures, especially with RAM.

    3. Re:Since you mentioned Dell by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I just fixed a Dell, that while it was stable - it was painfully slow. Turned out it was the hard drive causing the slowness - I mirrored the original drive to a spare I had laying around, swapped the drives, and the computer is now atleast 5 times faster. And the diagnostics said the original drive is fine. Go figure.

  4. Excellent Software by r0wan · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Troubleshooter by SmartCertify direct. It comes as a bootable floppy, with a couple of dongles and a CD-ROM to test ports while in diagnostic mode. This has worked excellently for us...we were able to diagnose some odd, random computer issues as being caused by bad video RAM

    --
    If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention.
    1. Re:Excellent Software by Evanrude · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I've used The Troubleshooter on numberous occasions and can attest to its ability to pinpoint most hardware related problems. It's a great program for anyone that does a lot of hardware maintenance.

      --

      ~.Evanrude
    2. Re:Excellent Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I used troubleshooter for a couple years at a local hardware shop and we finally quit renewing our product license. There were just too many false-positives and missed errors. I don't know if that makes this one worse than the others, but we went back to simple by-hand replacement testing which worked quite a bit better. Of course we still used memtest86 and harddrive manufacturers' testers, those are invaluable.

      Also of note, troubleshooter comes on one floppy disk and one backup floppy disk; it cannot be duplicated by any means I could discover, even for backups. "Not that there's anything wrong with that!"

    3. Re:Excellent Software by Hel+Toupee · · Score: 3, Redundant

      I worked at a small repair shop in the back of a store that sold used computers and the like. The latest version of TS(troubleshooter) that we used was 6.54. We only really used it to "test" machines that customers brought in to sell to us, and only so we had some paperwork to show the owner

      The consensus in the store was that we just replace components when something wasn't working. We had a stock of "known good" parts, and swapped out till we discovered who wasn't playing nice. We also had a test machine that was "known good" to test components it. 99 times out of 100 (at least in home/home office grade hardware) replacing a defective (or even just flaky) component was the way to go. Then, if the faulty component is under warranty, we use the vendor-supplied diagnostics (mostly for hard drives) to prove the part was bad, and get it covered under warranty.

      Excuse the rambling. I think the tools you use are going to depend on what the final outcome needs to be. (do you just replace the mobo if you know 2 of the PCI slots are bad, or do you need to try to fix them). Nothing beats good-old-fashioned-know-how. Get a good POST code card (I've heard a bit about a product called "PC Geiger" which contains a diagnostic PCI card and a readout panel). In my experience, most software based tools (with exception of a few, please don't flame me) are crap and just tell you what you already know. Just last week I had a SiSoft Sandra burn-in run just fine on a faulty Athlon XP 1700+.

      As always, your milage may vary

      --
      PERL:
      All of the power of Voodoo with most of the understandibility!
    4. Re:Excellent Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It can be quite easily duplicated for backup purposes using dd on any Unix-like system. Works beautifully, and I have a whole stack of floppies to use ... and an image file just in case.

    5. Re:Excellent Software by phoenix_rizzen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is a great little util. I really like the burn-in tests, and the fact that it can test the different RAM slots independently (on most mobos). Trying to figure out which stick of RAM is bad in a 4 GB system using memtest86 takes too long, and involves too many stops to replace the RAM chip. This way, I just let it run overnight and remove the faulty chip when it's done.

      The other tests are nice, and useful as well. And having it all on a bootable floppy is nice, as you don't have to worry about having a working OS on the system.

    6. Re:Excellent Software by MisterJones · · Score: 1

      I have also used Troubleshooter, and it is quite useful. I used to work for a school district, and we took surplus government systems (486's mostly) and fixed them to supply systems for the classrooms. Troubleshooter worked great at determining which parts of the hardware were working and which weren't. I think after we used Troubleshooter, we used Eurosoft PC Check. Back then, (2000-2001 timeframe) it supported all of the available hardware. (besides the 486's, we also used it on systems up to P2, I think...) It presents a simple DOS-like menu with a number of options for showing data about the hardware in the system, along with a large suite of different test programs for hardware. It was quite complete, for a 3.5" floppy disk! We didn't use anything but that, I'm not sure what all comes in the package. I would reccommend either of those packages. However, since I never purchased either (both were provided to me) I can't speak for the companies, prices, return polices, etc.

    7. Re:Excellent Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Add another thumbs-up for TroubleShooter.

      Our sysadmin uses it at work, so I've no idea how much it costs. I've had it find bad RAM three times now, on three different boxes.

    8. Re:Excellent Software by Alan+Hicks · · Score: 1
      troubleshooter comes on one floppy disk and one backup floppy disk; it cannot be duplicated by any means I could discover, even for backups.

      What did you try exactly? Assuming this is a standard floppy disk making a dd of the disk should work.

      # dd if=/dev/fd0 of =/tmp/trblshtr.img
      # dd if=/tmp/trblshtr.imp of=/dev/fd0

      That should almost certainly work as it copies the entire file system on the floppy disk.

      --
      Slackware, what else when it must be secure, stable, and easy?
  5. They are all basically useless... by pw700z · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nothing beats experience and a supply of 'known good' replacement parts. I have been out of the repair and troubleshooting business for years, but I always remember being frustrated at useless memory and system testing software that could not find anything wrong with memory chips, etcs, that were obviously bad. Even most hardware units (like ram testers) were almost useless. If the POST testing didn't find anything wrong, it seemed almost nothing else would either, most of the time. If you think the part is bad, swap it out with an equivalent and see if the problem goes away.

    1. Re:They are all basically useless... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what sucks in when you get a bad part in your known good supply.

      i had a pc that wouldn't run freebsd, but it ran linux and windows. (and windows was more unstable the usual)

      freebsd would load, but it was slow. the benchmark tool that freebsd has (forgot what it was called) ranked it as a 386 (it was a p2)

      we replaced everything but the actual case, keyboard and mouse and it didn't fix it.
      (new powersupply, new ram, new cpu, new motherboard, new cdrom, new hard drive, new video card, new nic)

    2. Re:They are all basically useless... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      My daddy called this "Frankenstein-ing." Nothing, absolutely nothing, beats it as a method for localizing hardware problems. (Of course you must have a least a few neurons firing to determine if it is the swapped component itself or an interaction between that and the rest of the system.)

      It's funny because "real" engineers will look upon this with disdain. "Why, we're REAL engineers, WE come up with theories and test them. Swapping out parts means you're merely GUESSING what is wrong." Er, isn't that what a THEORY IS?

      I currently have a client who is having a problem with a piece of PC based test equipment they build from scratch. It's basically a custom single board computer laptop with some additional test interfaces built in. There's a problem with the PC functionality. Multiple engineers and managers are running quite involved test programs to "prove" that the problem is one or another of their pet peeves. No one (except your Annonymous Coward hizzelf) would think of swapping a few components, making sure known good ones work in the unit and known bad ones from the unit do not work on a good PC. Oh well, when they've spent themselves and the damn thing still doesn't work, I'll have to go in and locate the problem in a half an hour. Don't worry, I'll do it off site and bill for two days of work.

    3. Re:They are all basically useless... by Lord+Dimwit+Flathead · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't disagree, but I can't help but think of the Jargon File entry for field circus:

      Q: How can you recognize a field circus engineer with a flat tire?
      A: He's changing one tire at a time to see which one is flat.

      Q: How can you recognize a field circus engineer who is out of gas?
      A: He's changing one tire at a time to see which one is flat.

      Q: How can you tell it's your field circus engineer?
      A: The spare is flat, too.

    4. Re:They are all basically useless... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I have to agree with this. I have been doing hardware repairs for 6 years straight now for several companies, including my own on both Macs and PCs. When I started this game, we used to fix computers, parts were expensive enough and labor for solving a problem could often be less than labor of reloading a system or replacing a part. Those days are over. Now its all about "known good" parts and "field replacement units" (aka new parts). I like the Troubleshooter (someone else already mentioned it) but the main thing I use it for is stress testing a system over night or low leveling a hard drive when its really messed up. If you care enough about ram to say for sure its good or bad, nothing beats a ram tester machine. problem is that they are expensive and each type of memory needs a new one (or at least a new module). The real exception to the rules is apple. they provide CDs for each machine, a customer version and a tech version, and then a diag per line and one per OS. when you add in the OS'es this means that you carry about 100 CDs with you all the time, but they are accurate tools.

      I have trained about 2 dozen techs working under me (mostly at CompUSA) and can say that there are rules and processes which must be learned and memorized, but almost never do we need a tool other than a bootable CD (such as win PE), a bootable floppy (win98), a few known good parts (modem, ram, CD-RW, power supply, NIC, sound card, cheap speakers, cheap monitor, cables) and a good screwdriver.

      I have used *all* of the tools mentioned both in the article and in the comments which I read. we would all like to believe that there is a way to ask for the problem and have the system tell us, but it simply doesn't work that way.

    5. Re:They are all basically useless... by Xabraxas · · Score: 1

      I'm glad somebody has some common sense. Testing is such a waste of time if you can just swap in a good part, especially with PC's. There are so many different configurations that there is no utility that could check for everything. I've had a lot of issues with PC's in the past year and I've run test after test only to find out that the test didn't find anything. It's hit or miss with the tests as much as it is hit or miss with swapping parts, if not more so. I can usually localize the problem depending on behaviour anyway so why not just take the 5 minutes to swap a part instead of running tests for hours only to find out that it was what I guessed it was all along. If that doesn't work then I will resort to testing.

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    6. Re:They are all basically useless... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      Yep, this is 100% truth!

      PC parts have gotten so inexpensive, you can purchase a spare of all the "likely to fail" parts for not much more money than a software license or two for these "diagnostic" packages.

      I've noticed that lately (in the last year or so), most PC problems people have are spyware or virus related. (System runs slowly, freezes up/blue-screens randomly,etc.) Next most common problem is a failing hard drive. A few years ago, bad RAM would often give you intermittent crashes/freezes, but I think the overall quality of memory has gone up from the junk that was being dumped on the market a while back. I just don't see all the RAM related issues I used to see.

      There's also a lot of complaining about poor quality power supplies causing instability and crashes, but I rarely see that. More often, an inferior power supply results in a machine that doesn't always power on, or it just dies completely. I've bought quite a few of those $15 AT style power supplies on Pricewatch too - and have yet to see one cause me any random, difficult-to-trace issues. Maybe I'm just lucky though?

      Diagnostic software always seemed a bit silly to me. If you have a system that's acting glitchy only on occasion, it's as likely as not it'll just freeze up/hang running the diag. software, so you won't get any useful results back from it!

  6. Right on! by Reverant · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can get so much information from a knoppix CD, it's just not worth looking anywhere else.

    1. Re:Right on! by xutopia · · Score: 1

      Care to tell us what we get on a Knoppix CD for this specific scenario? I get all confused with all the Ks all over the place.

    2. Re:Right on! by jim_deane · · Score: 1

      You can get so much information from a knoppix CD, it's just not worth looking anywhere else.

      Yes, but only if the computer can run Knoppix. Knoppix has suprisingly high basic requirements -- it runs a lot of processor and memory intensive eye candy.

      It won't even try to boot on my 350 mhz laptop with 96 megs of ram.

      Jim

    3. Re:Right on! by Elbows · · Score: 1

      Just the other day I ran knoppix on a PII 266 laptop wi/ 64 megs. I used a swapfile on the windows partition and booted into the XFCE desktop in KDE. It took a while to start up, but other than that ran fine.

    4. Re:Right on! by jim_deane · · Score: 1

      Just the other day I ran knoppix on a PII 266 laptop wi/ 64 megs. I used a swapfile on the windows partition and booted into the XFCE desktop in KDE. It took a while to start up, but other than that ran fine.

      Aha, swapfile. Knoppix is most useful (imho) because it can load and run from the CD without needing to use the HDD. This allows me to pop in and take a look at the HDD if things are awry.

      Of course, on a computer that is in good working order anyway, you can use the swapfile and just delete it later. That isn't a very useful way to do things if the HDD or OS is having problems.

      Jim

  7. Not many PC maintenance people use any diagnostics by HeX86 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And that's why... Most technicians do it by instinct and years of experience. If this peticular thing is happening, you know it could be one of x, y, or z.

    That's always worked better for me than anything else. Although it would be nice to have something tell me what's wrong :)

  8. Sandra by stratjakt · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sandra is a good info/benchmark util.

    For windows machines, I found a little app called RegSupreme which actually does a good job of cleaning/fixing keys in the registry.

    Best "tool" for tech support is a good working knowledge of the PC. If you're looking for a piece of software to do support for you, then I'm sure the rest of the self proclaimed "IT Guru's" here at slashdot will warm a spot for you in the unemployment line.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  9. I use make buildworld by gtrubetskoy · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is slightly OT, but I've found one of the best ways to test (as opposed diagnose) hardware is to install FreeBSD then run "make buildworld" on it... If it completes with no problems, it's a pretty good indication that the hardware is in good condition.

    1. Re:I use make buildworld by Tagren · · Score: 1

      Why not download a *.source.tar.gz at compile it under your current OS. Kinda long way for the same thing :) ?
      ---

    2. Re:I use make buildworld by 4b696e67 · · Score: 1

      That could take a while on older hardware. I sure the poster doesn't want the diagnosis to take hours. (Just got done with updating FreeBSD on my 3 year old thinkpad. That took 4 hours.) But, you are correct. A buildworld does stress the hardware fairly well.

    3. Re:I use make buildworld by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      This is slightly OT, but I've found one of the best ways to test (as opposed diagnose) hardware is to install FreeBSD then run "make buildworld" on it...

      If you're worried about system stability or processor-cooling effectiveness, a couple of good stress tests are Prime95 (it has a "torture-test" mode) and cpuburn. Somebody complained that the Shuttle SFF boxes tend to overheat and flake out. I built one (with three hard drives...it was for a DVR setup), set it up outside in Las Vegas' summer heat, and fired up cpuburn. It ran without so much as a hiccup.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    4. Re:I use make buildworld by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      So, basically you're saying that you check to see if a computer is good by making sure that FreeBSD is not dying... strange way to look at things.

    5. Re:I use make buildworld by yuri+benjamin · · Score: 1

      If it completes with no problems, it's a pretty good indication that the hardware is in good condition.

      and if it doesn't complete with no problems - does it tell you what the problem is?

      --
      You make the mistake of thinking you can educate the fundamental stupidity out of people. You can't.
  10. Just Swap parts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I say screw the software. You spend more time running the diagnostics that actually fixing the problem. Not that hard to carry some spare AGP cards, memory sticks, and power supplies. Quicker to start swapping in new stuff and seeing if you can get past post. I do run memtest on memory from time to time, but that's about the only software I use.

  11. Re:to start you off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Of course there are free utilities like the well-known memtest86, but I was wanted something more comprehensive"

    Read the post.

  12. Please to excuse me by Srividya · · Score: 1, Funny

    But Knoppix does not check parallel or serial loopback, and cannot suffice for the story, no?

    1. Re:Please to excuse me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you dont know how to test rs232 and parallel from knoppix then you need to get the hell out of the computer field.

      What, are you a Compusa technician? because you act like one.... clue-less.

    2. Re:Please to excuse me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cool a new e-mail address to bomb.

    3. Re:Please to excuse me by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > if you dont know how to test rs232 and parallel from knoppix then you need to get the hell out of the computer field.

      Yes, because obviously, if you don't know every useless little detail from an OS no one uses (knoppix, not Linux) then you are an idiot. Idiot. Are you a politician? Because you act like one... wit-less.

    4. Re:Please to excuse me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, the hatred that goes on here. First off, Knoppix IS Linux and works the same and plenty of people do use Knoppix. Second, the other guy has no business telling people that if you don't know linux, then get the hell out. That is just rude and ignorant. Good luck in life if that is how you act.

  13. Another vote for SiSoft Sandra by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 3, Informative
    Rather irritatingly, the free version has lots of menu icons that don't work, a bit like blanked-off switches in base model automobiles. However, it's a good tool for basic performance measurements and reassures you that your RAM/CPU etc are working at their rated speed.

    A tip: run it as Administrator or you'll get limited information out of the BIOS. And if you're using *nix, you'll have to look elsewhere.

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    1. Re:Another vote for SiSoft Sandra by Tassach · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Any diagnostic / troubleshooting software that requires that the computer boot into the operating system first is largely useless. It does nothing to help you fix a problem which is preventing the OS from booting.

      Generic tools like memtestX86 are a good start, but there is a limit to what you can do with generic tools. Ultimately, you need hardware-specific tests. Hardware manufactures need to do a better job of providing diagnostic tools for the things they sell. Yeah, you can test the gross functionality of any sound card by playing music, but to do a complete test you need something designed for that specific card.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  14. I've found these useful. by djatari2600 · · Score: 1

    Norton Utilities is still the best choice if you want to teach the user to manage his or her own diagnostics after time. I've found SiSoft's Sandra to be useful when identifying problems.

    --
    "It is the mark of an educated man to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." - Aristotle
    1. Re:I've found these useful. by Idealius · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Uh, yeah.. No, about half our customers' problems at our Support firm are over Norton Utilities or SystemWorks, or some other Symantec product breaking and screwing up the OS. Happens daily. They don't learn anything, but how to manually uninstall a Norton Product.

    2. Re:I've found these useful. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HERE HERE!!

      I completely agree. Their products cause soooo many problems.

    3. Re:I've found these useful. by MuParadigm · · Score: 1


      Like the peer post, I've seen Norton Systemworks, Crashguard in particular, really screw up clients systems. I used to recommend Norton Utilities in the old days, but no longer. It causes more problems than it resolves for most people.

    4. Re:I've found these useful. by robogop · · Score: 1

      Total agreement with that here - I have found that NU or SW are great products if you are advanced enough to know what they are doing and when you should/shouldn't use them. Of course, if you are at that level do you really need these specific tools?

      The problem comes from the slightly more knowledgeable users who say - "I have a problem. These tools are supposed to be good, so let's give them a try." And end up causing no end of trouble. Most of the time, the people who these tools are marketed to are the very ones who shouldn't be using them.

      --

      I'm a great believer in luck. The harder I work the more I have of it. - Thomas Jefferson
    5. Re:I've found these useful. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always thought it was "Hear, Hear!"..

    6. Re:I've found these useful. by Barny · · Score: 0

      Yup, i get the same thing, 1-2 machines a day worth of nortons problems, most customers get the talk...
      "well, as the problem was, we could have recovered your data, but you installed norton xxxx and its now near impossible."

      As to the original topic, post codes are your friend, learn em, get a card to read em and have a good range of "known good" hardware for swapping in/out.

      In the odd occasion where you can boot windows the problem is much more likely to either be minor hardware or software (i would love one of the thinkgeek Ts, "don't ask me, its a software problem").

      GL with the hardware problems, and remember to post the good ones to http://techtales.com/tftechs

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    7. Re:I've found these useful. by dilbert627 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Norton Antivirus 2004 especially. We've had SO many people come in our shop who have installed it and it screwed up their systems. STAY AWAY!

  15. Linux by BuildMonkey · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Once I bought a PC (yes, I bought it.) and it kept crashing after running NT for 30-60 minutes. I couldn't convince the vendor that there was a problem until I tried to boot linux and it would kernel trap during boot complaining about bad memory.

    After demonstrating the (reproducible) problem the vendor replaced the second SIMM and all was well.

  16. yahoo articel today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    there was an article over at yahoo (most popular)
    about free programs an editor at yahoo recommends.
    i think there was a free "pc testing software"
    mentioned too.

  17. I am looking at my sagging bookshelves that are by i)ave · · Score: 5, Insightful

    stressing under the weight of years worth of hardware & software Bibles. If there is such a miracle as a good diagnostic program that can keep up with the daily onslaught of new hardware, protocols and standards, then I have wasted a lot of my time but wish you the best of luck on your quest.

    --
    -- I'd give my right arm to be ambidextrous
    1. Re:I am looking at my sagging bookshelves that are by Idealius · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree with i)ave. I am a technician for a Tech Support firm with a diagnosis program and just like other diagnosis programs, ours does not delve deep into hardware specific queries -- it goes by what Windows sees. There are several valid reasons for this. To catalog all of the custom driver interfaces that are needed when testing out the different types of hardware out there would be an immense undertaking. Another reason being Window's device interface is more than suitable to go by. Don't recode the wheel!

    2. Re:I am looking at my sagging bookshelves that are by Flounder · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Another reason being Window's device interface is more than suitable to go by.

      However, what if the problem you are trying to diagnose is that the user can't boot into Windows? Kind of hard to access the Windows device interface when you can't get Windows running.

      --

      No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

    3. Re:I am looking at my sagging bookshelves that are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well then you have a bigger problem, it's unlikely that a boot cd diagnostics is going to do much good since it relys on the same hardware as windows to actually run software. what a stupid question.

  18. mod parent up by mekkab · · Score: 2

    True, in a world where a faulty SCSI terminator can cause intermittent behavior (Thanks a lot, SUN!) There's nothing like spare parts to swap in and out.

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  19. Re:to start you off by mkettler · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Memtest is a great tool, however it is specificaly mentioned in the article itself.

    If you read the article, RebornData is looking for something more comprehensive than memtest offers. (ie: more than just a memory test. I assume to include disk, bios, video, cpu information, and a variety of other system tests and checks.)

    I myself question the need for much more than a disk-surface-scan tool and a copy of memtest, but it's what RebornData is looking for.

    --
    -Matt
  20. Built in by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 1

    Event Viewer in Administrative Tools in Control Panel.

  21. memtest86 by DrMindWarp · · Score: 5, Informative
    The most common problems I encounter with PCs are memory related.

    The best tools for checking memory are memtest86 and the follow-up memtest86+.

    Both of these are free to download and use. I usually leave them running for roughly 24hrs for a reasonable level of confidence. You should also burn-in the other major components too but memory is the best place to start.

  22. #1-TuffTEST Pro, cheap, bootable by og_sh0x · · Score: 5, Informative

    #1 TuffTEST pro is a cheap, bootable, hardware-only diagnostic. It supports all current x86 processors. It does not work on top of DOS or Windows or anything, so it's convenient for eliminating the hardware as a problem. Works great, I use it all the time. As a side note, if you use it on Dell machines, Dell seems to have an internal loopback on the serial and parallel ports. It will report the ports are OK even if they're not. http://www.tufftest.com/

    1. Re:#1-TuffTEST Pro, cheap, bootable by Leareth · · Score: 1

      I second Tufftest. We bought copy for my group here and the few time it's been used it's worked great.

      Mind you 90% of our problem have been user error so far.

      --
      *A)bort, R)etry, I)nfluence with large hammer.*
    2. Re:#1-TuffTEST Pro, cheap, bootable by Trixter · · Score: 1

      My personal experience with TuffTEST Pro (yes, I purchased it legitimately) was that it was completely unable to find known bad PC800 RAM on a dual P4 Xeon motherboard.

      Mind you, it's fantastic for troubleshooting my older vintage computers, but I wouldn't use it for modern use.

  23. ultimatebootcd by ggeezz · · Score: 5, Informative

    I use the ulitmatebootcd. It consolidates several good boot floppy images onto one cd, including many free hardware diagnosis programs.

    1. Re:ultimatebootcd by Mitchell+Mebane · · Score: 1

      Along the same lines, but using (obviously illegally) commercial software, is Hiren's BootCD. An excellent tool, if you can get a hold of it. eMule is a good bet.

      --

      The roots of education are bitter, but the fruit is sweet.
      --Aristotle
    2. Re:ultimatebootcd by J3M · · Score: 1

      Anyone have another mirror for this Ultimate Boot CD? All of the mirrors listed on the main site seem to be slashdotted or taken down because of the load. I'd like to take a look at it.

      --
      Aych tea tea pea colon slash slash slash dot dot org slash
    3. Re:ultimatebootcd by J3M · · Score: 1

      Hate responding to myself, but nevermind. Found a Freshmeat link that actually has a newer version than what the link above lists (v2.1). Here's the link for anyone who might be interested. Looks like it might be very useful CD to have around ...

      --
      Aych tea tea pea colon slash slash slash dot dot org slash
    4. Re:ultimatebootcd by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 1

      No, the link above (ultimatebootcd.com) also has 2.1. Unfortunately, many of the linked mirrors don't. Most disappointingly, the bittorrent isn't working, either (can't connect to tracker). But I worked my way down the list of mirrors (only the ones showing "Ver 2.1") until I found a good one -- #10 in my case.

      It looks like the site hasn't been updated since Jan. 19th, when he talked about releasing 2.2 in "late Jan or early Feb". Normally I wouldn't think much of that, but when combined with the decayed mirrors and broken bittorrent, it seems something is amiss. I hope the author is OK.

      --
      Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  24. YHBT YHL FOAD HAND by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    see subject

  25. Forget expensive software by CodeRx · · Score: 5, Informative

    It is not possible to diagnose hardware by running software on it. At best you can determine if there is a hardware failure, but no software will be able to nail it down to a specific component all of the time.

    Consider a motherboard failure for instance - a failing motherboard can in effect emulate any other hardware failure - ide controller bad? Your software may blame the hard drive. Bus problems can cause memory checks to fail.

    I recommend you carry a simple bootable cdrom that loads the entire system (disk i/o, memory i/o and cpu load) and checks for errors. When a system fails these checks all it tells you is the problem is definately hardware and not a buggy driver or other software issue.

    See BartPE for a good free solution.

  26. The state of PCs by Threni · · Score: 5, Insightful

    PC hardware is shit. Made as cheaply as possible, knocked out by the million. Nothing gets repaired - nothing is repairable. If it's broken, buy a new one.

    PC software is shit. Software is still in the dark ages. No qualifications to show who has the first clue about quality, security, extensibility etc.

    If you get any problem you can't fix in 30 mins, best to make sure you've backed up everything important (naturally you never need to ask anyone whether this is the case, because everybody always backs up their important data on a daily basis, right?), then just format or ghost the fucking disk. End of problem, and no tedious troubleshooting what happens when you try and get a LameSoft2000 graphics card working with a ShysterTronics printer.

    1. Re:The state of PCs by sleeperservice · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The parent may be modded as "Funny", but speaking as a veteran of the support wars, it's actually about as "Insightful" as you can get.

    2. Re:The state of PCs by fruey · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is modded funny, but there's many a true word spoken in jest. Half the time, having a good backup of valuable files means precisely not losing hours to recover your machine. I've lost countless hours bringing my machine back purely because my backup set was too old and I wanted files back.

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    3. Re:The state of PCs by NewStarRising · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Except that the origianl post was inquiring about HARDWARE problems. No amount of re-installing will cuse a faulty peice of hardware.

      --
      b3 4phr41d 0f my 4bov3-4v3r4g3 c0mpu73r kn0wI3dg3!
      MadDwarf
    4. Re:The state of PCs by ImpTech · · Score: 1

      Why? Just put the harddrive in a known-good machine, mount it, grab your stuff, and be done with it. For that matter load Knoppix and copy to a fileshare somewhere. Unless your computer is the only one within several miles of you, there's no reason to waste time recovering a software install just for some datafiles. The only reasons you need backups are hard disk failure and random data corruption, neither of which are recoverable.

    5. Re:The state of PCs by Threni · · Score: 1

      > No amount of re-installing will cuse a faulty peice of hardware.

      Incorrect. I had a power failure on my Windows 2000 box at home. Ever since my machine has been making clunking noises as it booted up. It passed scandisk tests ok, but was taking between 0 and 200 odd seconds extra to get into windows. I did a full reinstall of windows 2000, including the format, and it works fine now.

      I mean, I guess I could have downloaded tools, put the drive in another machine, used the other ide channel, fiddled with the dip switches, searched the net/usenet for similar problems etc etc but who can be bothered with all that? Life's too short for PC problems. I guess if I were being paid by the minute...

    6. Re:The state of PCs by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      Data corruption is recoverable, but it's a bit of a pain.

      For a techie, mounting a drive and ripping off the data is no problem, but that's really a couple hours of work and for a user who doesn't know what a file is much less where they are stored, trying to find where they've saved their precious documents is hell. They'll also try to hold you responsible should you miss anything.

      My general pattern was... and still is should I need to do it again some day...

      Figure out what apps are on the machine, figure out where the apps store their files, back up all the data from those directories into a reasonably sorted directory structure.

      Then.... grab every non-program file modified in the past three months and throw it into one big ugly directory. Pay attention to locations should some other program directory become evident.

      Why anyone wouldn't shell out for a new HDD at that point is beyond me. I think I'll make it manditory if I offer anyone any help in the future.

      Finally, explain briefly to them what a file is, what a directory is, give them a quick 1-page document describing it...

      ... afterwards, Microsoft's screwed up C:, D:, /My Computer, /Desktop, .../My Documents heirarchy can completely confuse them. It's really hard to explain how that works to somebody who's struggling with the concept of a file.

      Unix-ish /home is so nice.

    7. Re:The state of PCs by Alzheimers · · Score: 1

      Just out of experience, it sounds like the crash may have corrupted the partition table, causing the drive to look outside the physical drive geometry for data. This would cause the read heads to try to force themselves off-platter (odd clunking noises), as well as delay the OS until the hardware reports an error.

      Reformatting the disk is a good fix, but sometimes it may be too late if the hardware gets damaged. If you experience *any* further issues with the drive, I'd be ready to replace it at a moment's notice.

      I've had too many machines come back to me a few days later with identical problems after reformatting, and RMA'ing a replacement was the only sure-fire way of making sure it didn't recur.

    8. Re:The state of PCs by Analysis+Paralysis · · Score: 1
      That clunking noise may be a due to a head crash or a drive mechanism failure - in either case reformatting may only provide a temporary solution. It would be safer to consider your disk as being on borrowed time and plan to replace it.

      Depending on the make of disk, try running the manufacturer's diagnostic utilities - they may give a better idea of any problems.

      IBM http://www.storage.ibm.com/hdd/support/download.ht m
      Fujitsu http://www.fujitsu.com/au/support/hdd/warranty/
      Maxtor http://www.maxtor.com/en/support/downloads/index.h tm
      Seagate http://www.seagate.com/support/disc/index.html
      Western Digital http://support.wdc.com/download/index.asp
      Samsung http://www.samsung.com/Support/ProductSupport/inde x.htm

    9. Re:The state of PCs by Threni · · Score: 1

      Thanks to both of your for the replies. I might check out some of those links, and I might try filling my disk with stuff then verifying it. It's a newish 120gig seagate drive. My windows event log was full of `data controller errors` on one of the ide ports. The format I did (actually I did two) took ages - it didn't report any errors, but I guess that goes back to my original `shoddy hardware/software` post.

    10. Re:The state of PCs by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I don't get why people always reformat the hard drives whenever they want to redo a borked Windows install. Usually, I just nuke C:\Windows\, and C:\Program Files\. Then I'll rename C:\Documents and Settings\. Once I have Windows installed I'll copy the important stuff from there into the new C:\Documents and Settings\ and nuke the old directory. The only time I messed up by doing this is when I nuked C:\Windows\ on a '95 box, then remembered that all the files on the desktop resides in C:\Windows\Desktop\. D'oh!

      Also, for easier fixing of Windows installs, I recommend making a 5-15GB C:\ partition that's FAT32, then a NTFS data partition. The reason for FAT32 is that Linux utilities have no problems with it, while writing to NTFS is still very sketchy.

    11. Re:The state of PCs by JoshWurzel · · Score: 1

      I realize you meant to say "CURE a faulty piece of hardware", but when I first read it I thought you said "CAUSE a faulty piece of hardware".

      To which I thought, "well that's silly, because some piece of hardware stops working every time I install windows!" ;)

    12. Re:The state of PCs by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1
      Try to get some util for interrogating the SMART data of the disk. Disks that aren't hopelessly obsolete usually support SMART, and keep records about things like recoverable and unrecoverable read errors, seek errors, and many more.

      The Ultimate Bood CD mentioned earlier here has such utility on it. Smartmontools for Linux/unix is another tool to achieve that.

  27. F.I.R.E. by mahdi13 · · Score: 5, Informative
    Forensic and Incident Responce Environment
    FIRE is a portable bootable cdrom based distribution with the goal of providing an immediate environment to perform forensic analysis, incident response, data recovery, virus scanning and vulnerability assessment.

    Also provides necessary tools for live forensics/analysis on win32, sparc solaris and x86 linux hosts just by mounting the cdrom and using trusted static binaries available in /statbins.
    --
    "Some things have to be believed to be seen." - Ralph Hodgson
    1. Re:F.I.R.E. by mahdi13 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Of course it's been idle for a while, so Knoppix is a great substitute considering a lot of the same tools are on there

      --
      "Some things have to be believed to be seen." - Ralph Hodgson
    2. Re:F.I.R.E. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      F.I.R.E. is good for a security investigation.
      But I don't see it being very useful for troubleshooting hardware.

      The best way to use F.I.R.E on Windows is to learn to "shovel shell" to another machine with netcat and then run fred-nc.bat. You get a great forensic report without writing to the hard drive of the machine you are investigating.

    3. Re:F.I.R.E. by jazzbo54 · · Score: 1

      1)i dont see FIRE being sold on CD like knoppix
      2) how is this done?

      >>>best way to use F.I.R.E on Windows is to learn to "shovel shell" to another machine with netcat and then run fred-nc.bat. You get a great forensic report without writing to the hard drive of the machine you are investigating.

  28. Go to the OEM's by futuresheep · · Score: 1
    Many of the OEMs' have diagnostic software specific to their PC's available for download. Example from Dell: Software.

    The error codes generated by these disks will save you a ton of time on the phone, since they'll tell the tech on the other line what needs to be replaced. I'd also recommend getting hardware certs from any of the OEM's you'll may deal with.

    1. Re:Go to the OEM's by wampus · · Score: 1

      As the OEM for most of the machines I support, I don't have time to write a custom diagnostics suite.

  29. a vacuum cleaner! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    invest in a vacuum cleaner.
    solves 95% of all "hardware
    problem" cases.

    damn i've seen dust that would rival
    the lunar/martian surface around
    CPU fans and grafic cards.

    oh, and if your customers/employees
    get sick alot, maybe also check out
    the ventilation system (DUST!).

    i'm sure the SARS virus is still
    looming in the ventilation system
    of some high class singaporen,
    hongkong hotel ...

  30. diag software by Steevee · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...the best software i've ever encountered was inside my skull....

    --
    if electricity is created by electrons, is morality created by morons?
    1. Re:diag software by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      My Skull? Never heard of that P2P program.

    2. Re:diag software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, looks like you can get a job working for this guy then!

    3. Re:diag software by xyllix · · Score: 1

      Cool! Where can I download a copy?

    4. Re:diag software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      on edonkey??

  31. Barking up the wrong tree... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have yet to find diagnostic software that is more reliable than my own expereince/instincts. I haven't really done an exhaustive search, but the handful that I have used tend not to work well (and take...too...long...).

    Most OEM's are fairly accomodating if you describe problems in a decent amount of detail (and the machine is under warranty).

    If these are white boxes, you're probably better off keeping a pile of spare parts around. A quick swap can get a machine up and running quickly.

    Good Luck!

  32. Hardware Specific by Col.+Panic · · Score: 2, Informative

    I will resort to diagnostics only when other troubleshooting is unrevealing, but the diagnostics for whichever hardware you have are usually provided by the manufacturer. For example, each hard drive manufacturer will have its own diagnositcs and if you expect warranty returns, you will have to run their program and tell them what fails.

  33. Re:memtest86 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > The best tools for checking memory are memtest86 and the follow-up memtest86+.

    Can't you read the article before you post? He knows about memtest86, even gives the link himself.

  34. Aida32 by lawpoop · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Aida32 is a great windows-based system information application. It's wonderfully complete --- I've used it countless times to find drivers for those 'unknown devices' (modems, sound cards, network cards) that windows can't recognize, and that I didn't want to take out of the machine. However, it doesn't really do diagnostics, such as checking memory or serial ports.

    Free for personal use, businesses must register. Well worth it.

    --
    Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
    -- Pablo Picasso
    1. Re:Aida32 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      awesome, and there was me using `lspci` and `lsusb`, when i could have had a full blown graphical application. Boy do i feel stupid.

    2. Re:Aida32 by lawpoop · · Score: 1
      You were using those commands on a win32 environment? Running cygwin, or what?

      Do those commands have Aida's 28000 component library so you know what the thing actually is, or do they just tell you the chips on the bus? Do they show you the event log and software installations?

      So, yes, you should fell a little stupid, esp. after you try it. ;)

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
  35. Re:Not many PC maintenance people use any diagnost by Teddy+Caddy · · Score: 1

    I agree. If a program could do all that, you would not have a job. You are the diagnostics. You are the one who provides fixes. I find posting to discussion forums helpful for problems that I cannot figure out alone.

  36. Diagnostic software not worth the trouble by realmolo · · Score: 1

    Hardware of ALL kinds is so cheap these days, that your time is more expensive.

    If you think something is broken, replace it. You should have a stock of "standard" parts, like hard drives and RAM.

    If replacing a few parts doesn't work, replace the whole damn PC. You don't want your customers stuck with a PC that has already had severe hardware problems.

  37. Refund? We don't need no stinking refund! by zulux · · Score: 1



    If the jerks won't take back their shoddy merchandise, document the steps to took and the letters you wrote - then get your credit-card company to 'chargeback' the purchase price.

    More info from the AG of California here

    --

    Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

  38. aida32 by jhoude · · Score: 2, Informative

    aida32 is a very good tool to get information about your hardware and software... (similar to sandra)
    And it is free.
    http://www.aida32.hu/aida32.php

  39. Can't beat working hardware by scythian · · Score: 1

    Certainly you can pinpoint with some accuracy what's wrong. Pull it, smash it, and replace it. Nothing beats good hardware, or quality hardware ... or just replacing stuff. Everything is so cheap nowadays, that you could buy the network card for $5, the video card for $20 ...
    Parrallel loopback cable? Scrap it, move to USB.
    And, please, don't buy eMachines --- my monitor caught fire, the NIC stopped working, and the video card stopped working. Monitor on their dime, others on my $5.

    Good luck, and not to credit windows for much, but I've found that, in XP, the system will detect or analyze hardware problems reasonably correctly.

    -Rob

    --
    terpmotors.com
  40. Most Linux distroes have good diagnostics by rqqrtnb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Most all the modern distros have comprehensive tools for checking the filesystems and analysis of the machine's hardware (including cool stuff like tweaking the hard drives/etc).

    Random case studies WRT normal Linux operations vs. normal MS-Windows operations in the case of 'marginal' hardware situations:

    Case 1: Gateways' shiped with the 'dreaded' Quantum SCSI disk drives:

    We bought a couple of Gateway workstations that Gateway shipped with Quantum 9gig W/F SCSI disk drives (avoid these like the plague). With one machine, we tossed the pre-installed MS-Windows (95?) and installed RedHat Linux (5.2 or maybe 6.1). The other machine got MS-Windows NT 4.0 installed. After about 1 month, the machine with Linux installed reported disk I/O errors (and crashes). The machine would recover (fsck after hard reset in a couple of cases) -- the disk had not totally farmed, just started to lose it. We got a replacement disk (IBM) from Gateway and did a disk-to-disk transfer (dump | restore, partition by partition) and used a boot floppy to re-boot and install lilo. This was some years ago. The 'NT box reported no problems until after about 6-7 months of use. Then crashed and refused to reboot. Disk was close to complete death. We suspect that the disk in the 'NT box was probably starting to go at the same time as the disk in the Linux box, but MS-Windows NT failed to notice *minor* disk I/O errors.

    Case 2: Token MS-Windows box goes off line and gets converted to a take-home Linux machine:

    We had a Gateway G6-200 (PPro 200mhz) machine that was the lab's 'token' MS-Windows box (NT 4.0). For various reasons (including lack of serious use), we took it off line. Later we needed a take-home box, so we *tried* to install Linux on it. The install kept crashing. No apparent reason way. Finally, we swapped out the RAM SIMMs, and presto, Linux installed properly. I guess the RAM had developed some bad bits, and MS-Windows NT failed to notice...

    *Maybe* 'NT is notorious about not noticing hardware failures. Maybe Linux is really very sensitive to "minor" hardware problems (slowly developing failures).

    1. Re:Most Linux distroes have good diagnostics by thoth · · Score: 1

      I also had this experience. Several years ago (probably 1994) I had a Dell notebook. It served me well, and I ran both Win 3.1 and Slackware Linux on it.

      After a while, the Win 3.1 install was giving me serious problems. It was acting up, not working consistently. I reboot into slackware, and watched the driver messages go by, until I saw a repeated message, something like "can't talk to drive - ide controller timeout?"

      The error message on linux was so much more informative. There was no error message on Win 3.1, just random behavior.

      Granted, this was 10 years ago, perhaps a current Windows gives better error messages or diagnostic info.

    2. Re:Most Linux distroes have good diagnostics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, this is third-hand and completely non-technical, but somewhere I read that Linux uses memory "bottom up" and NT uses memory "top down". Thus, it's quite common that 1 OS will see memory errors and the other won't.

      As for the disk issue, NTFS is far more robust that ext2 (not flamebait, fact -- it's also why NTFS is slower) Quite frequently a manual CHKDSK can point out tons of problems that are not otherwise apparent. You also sometimes see event lot messages full of disk errors for systems that are "working fine".

  41. Answer: Sucker by duffbeer703 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    If diagnostics software actually worked... you wouldn't have a business, and PC manufacturers wouldn't operate call centers.

    Learn to troubleshoot the hardware that you are fixing rather than learning to divine meaningful answers from some stupid piece of software.

    BTW the magic diagnostic software is probaly just dumping tables from WMI (Windows Management Interface) anyway. you can do the same with a SQL client and driver available from Microsoft.

    --
    Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
  42. SpinRite and Memtest by resonance · · Score: 5, Informative

    The only effective hardware tests I've used in the ten years I've been supporting all kinds of hardware and software have been SpinRite and Memtest86. Between these two, I can check for the most insidious and hard-to-detect hardware problems; i.e. flakey hard drives and RAM. A cheap $20 POST card is highly useful for dead machines. You don't need all the extra features the Microscope card gives you unless you are designing motherboards or doing some other such serious work. No software will replace your own experience and ability to know where a problem is forming based on the specific failure of the machine. All the rest of the so-called diagnostic software is more or less useless from a practical perspective, aside from testing serial ports with loopback plugs and printing cute certification reports for anal customers. This is detective work. You have to suss out the exact problem based on clues left by the failure of the system. Learn how the hardware works, and it's easier than you think.

    --
    Learn how a CPU works before you learn to program. Seriously.
    1. Re:SpinRite and Memtest by Trixter · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sadly, SpinRite is currently useless because it only supports FAT12/16/32 filesystems. If it supported NTFS, it would be infinitely more useful, but Steve hasn't updated it in 6+ years.

  43. Biatchux by gato_mato · · Score: 1

    Try Fire - http://sourceforge.net/projects/biatchux

  44. DisplayMate by jtilak · · Score: 2, Informative

    for tweaking your display. An absolute must have.

    1. Re:DisplayMate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can't see that your display isn't perfect beyond a certain degree, what does it matter?

  45. So what should the author look for? by netglen · · Score: 1

    So what about testing of the Com, Parallel, USB, Firewire, PS/2 and network ports? Is there some package out there where you can attach a loopback device to each port to test them? It's disgusting seeing so much snakeoil being sold today.

  46. Flawed Concept. by Sentosus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have tried to find this, but the problem with getting flawed hardware to run software to detect it is flawed is just that in concept.

    First of all, if it is an issue with hardware, the machine may not boot at all. If it is a ram issue, the diagnostic software may generate errors.

    Second, even if it highlights an error in a configuration, it could be generated with the analysis software.

    Third is that failed hardware often will not register as failed unless it is operating. Such as, a failed modem will not become noticable until it is used and then it may lock the computer up which could stop the software diagnosing the issue.

    Your best bet is to use a cause and effect analysis. Then trial and error. The machine won't boot, find every possible cause of it not booting and eliminate each one as a possible cause. Continue on this until the issue is completely solved. Make a checklist for yourself so you don't forget anything.

    It is how I do freelance repairs and it has proven bulletproof compared to the Voodoo Computer Repair Experts that try random things in the hope that it fixes the issue. (Install drivers, reinstall OS, Check CPU)

    1. Re:Flawed Concept. by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 2

      Getting a sick PC to diagnose itself is a ridiculous and hopeless concept. * If it's sick, how can you expect a diagnostic program to run? * PC's are infinitely variable, and poorly documented. How can you expect ANY program to do what a human-mind can't do-- i.e. figure out that undocumented register PLSTHRHS on the AGP video card works okay in all modes, except if the CPU just made a 32-bit unaligned request while there's an interrupt pending and the PCI bus has requested a ECC cycle, asyncronous with a memory-refresh escapade during a protect-mode REP OUTSB instruction which was trapped by the DPMI monitor and reflected to both real and protect mode handers, the latter of which got a page-fault? (Repeat the above for 999,999 other registers, times 9E99 other unlikely combinations) (Just keep some old obsolescent but known good coponents: video card, network card, hard disk, power supply, motherboard, and some RAM. For under $200 you'll have a complete set of spares)

    2. Re:Flawed Concept. by crazyaxemaniac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wouldn't discount the usefulness of hardware diagnostic software too much. I work in a computer repair shop. More often than not the issues that come through our shop are software related.

      Guess what? After we fixed the software issues the systems seem fine. We obviously can't test the systems all day. Diagnostic software has been useful for spotting bad chips on memory modules and bad sectors on HDDs.

      I can't say how many times I've cleared up a spyware/virus issue on a machine only to discover it also had a bad HDD. That kind of problems only gets worse so I'm doing a service for my customers by alerting them to the problem and giving them the option to replace it.

  47. pc diags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    yeah, nothing beats experience. But techies at BestBuy use Pc Certify. I still trust my instincts, but to double check myself I still burn it in w/ Sandra or MemTestx86. Knoppix works good too, but some new hardware is not recignized properly and it hates my Gigabyte 8sq800 sis655fx board, but so do many other distros.

  48. Memtest86 by Kenja · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Its free and will tell you if your memory sucks.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  49. Hard Drive Diagnostics by Botchka · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've heard and read great things about Spinrite from Steve Gibson, for hard drive diagnostics and I have friends that swear by it. The only drawback to his current version is that it won't do a thing for NTFS partitions. That being said, he is working on Spinrite 6.0 that WILL read NTFS partitions. This new edition is due out any time now. If you buy Spinrite 5 you get a free upgrade to 6 when it becomes available. As far as a general software based, pc diagnostic tool, I've yet to see any that actually work with any degree of certainty. SiSoft Sandra, as others have mentioned, is pretty good at letting you know what hardware is in the box. That along with some available "known good parts" is what I do to diagnose issues. I have also found the book Upgrading and Repairing PC's to be particularly valuable and a must have in my collection.

    --
    Money not found! A)bort, R)etry, D)eclare Bankruptcy
  50. Ultimate Boot CD by ronmon · · Score: 1

    I'm not going to link this because I don't want the poor guy to get slashdotted. But those that are truly interested can search Google or Freshmeat and find it.

    It's completely free and contains almost 50 bootable utilities ranging from hardware diagnostics to offline NT password/registry editor to linux recovery distros.

  51. Some products by wfberg · · Score: 4, Informative

    As others mentions, memtest86 and knoppix are invaluable tools.

    Other tools you might be interested in;
    Aida32 basically lists all of your devices, drivers, wmi software entries, pci devices, etc. for windows - needs an install, though.

    OnTrack sell Easy Recovery Professional; the "file repair" options are pretty crappy, but for serious, near-forensic recovery on fscked up filesystems, ERP is a fine tool. Some of OnTrack's software (i.e. SMART tests, usually) may be licensed by the manufacturer of your harddrive, so check those pages out.

    SiSoft Sandra is recommended a lot, but I don't find it offers a lot of diagnostics, though it is prone to crashing.

    On windows, you might want to check out the Event Viewer, hidden in the Computer Management section of the (classic) Control Panel -- it will list all sorts of errors and notifications, kind of like /var/log/messages ;-)

    --
    SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    1. Re:Some products by netglen · · Score: 1

      >> Ontrack

      So far I like their file recovery software. I've seen it recover entire contents of floppy discs where as Norton and similar products wouldn't even detect a floppy in the drive. It's well worth the cost of buying Ontrack if you come across tons of problematic media.

    2. Re:Some products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      download ontrack at http://fosisoft.home.ro

    3. Re:Some products by Dalcius · · Score: 1

      Speaking of file recovery, I've found testdisk to be a godsend. It'll run in Linux/DOS and can locate filesystem headers on a disk. It'll even let you browse certain filesystems without mounting them.

      I've found 6+ month old partitions on my disk (complete with a few directory listings) with this thing.

      http://www.cgsecurity.org/index.html?testdisk.html

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
    4. Re:Some products by wap911 · · Score: 1

      Aida32 does not need to installed after the first install. just copy the folder to a cd and run the exe. helped many times MemTest86 -- never be without it. PowerSupply tester unless you have a Fluke77 Bootable *nix cd or Barts PEBuilder http://www.nu2.nu/pebuilder/ if you just have to have DOS/Win

    5. Re:Some products by Nerd4News · · Score: 1

      I just used Ontrack EZ Recovery Pro to recover files off a 160 gig HD that was so hosed that nothing else would recognize it. Took a couple of hours to index it then I recovered to a mapped drive over the network. I've even used it to recover files off a HD that had been repartitioned and formatted. Great software available Here

      The old Ontrack SystemSuite is the answer to those that hate Norton (as I do.) Full set of system utilities including hardware diags. It's now sold by VCOM

  52. OT, but I have a tough hardware problem... by Onan+The+Librarian · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've taken an ailing HP Omnibook 4150 laptop to my local computer repair place where I was told (in this order) :

    1. I needed a new power supply.
    2. I needed a new motherboard.
    3. They didn't really know what was wrong with it.

    It suffers from intermittent power failure, otherwise it runs fine. I wish I knew how to locate the trouble or if I'm just wasting my time thinking this machine can be fixed. I'm loathe to take it to another repairman, I'm already out some $$ that got me no closer to a real solution. I hope this is an appropriate question to ask, 'cause I like that machine and would rather not junk it. Any civil advice will be vastly appreciated (including suggested URLs for diagnostic tools such as those mentioned in the original article). TIA!

    Btw, the repair house told me that their "diagnostics" consisted of letting the machine run for a day or two. I paid them their bench fee and swore I'd never take another machine there again.

    1. Re:OT, but I have a tough hardware problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HP laptops have cooling issues, don't they?

    2. Re:OT, but I have a tough hardware problem... by SysKoll · · Score: 1

      I suggest booting your laptop from a Knoppix Linux CD (won't install anything on the HD). Then you'll have a list of what's been detected by Knoppix. Any dead hardware would be missing. Some Windows-only hardware might not show, though. That would be my first attempt at determining your problem.

      --

      --
      Mad science! Robots! Underwear! Cute girls! Full comic online! http://www.girlgeniusonline.com/

    3. Re:OT, but I have a tough hardware problem... by matthewg42 · · Score: 1

      A place I used to work used a whole load of HP Vectra Desktops. We had a batch of 'em with a dodgy power regulation board (swappable board not much bigger than a DIMM). Your symptoms sound similar, but I doubt the omnibook is so modular and it could be difficult to source the part.

    4. Re:OT, but I have a tough hardware problem... by grgyle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      With itermittent failures, diagnosing is often really a shot in the dark, it doesn't matter if it's a laptop, an automobile, a television, whatever. The techies you went to might not be entirely to blame for their inability to solve the problem.

      The first step to diagnosing a problem is being able to reproduce and analyze the problem. It's the classic case of bring your car in, complaining about "the noise under the hood", and the mechanic can't get the car to make that noise when he's test driving. Letting your machine run for awhile doesn't sound like that bad of an idea, if an immediate cause wasn't evident. Twitchy power failures could have many causes, although the shop you went to should have at least been honest enough to admit from the beginning that they were really just guessing at solutions, and let you slide on charging you for the benchwork.

      I went through a similar nightmare once when I bought a system from a custom build place. About once every two or three weeks, my machine would have a power failure, usually taking critical system files with it, forcing me to spend hours of reinstallation/formatting/etc. I took my machine back (under warranty luckily) about 6 times, and they never solved the problem. I eventually just ditched it, figured I'd drawn the lemon lottery, as it wasn't worth the hassle anymore. I never did figure out what was wrong with it.

      --
      ----- And all that the Lorax left here in this mess was a small pile of rocks, with one word...UNLESS.
    5. Re:OT, but I have a tough hardware problem... by Somegeek · · Score: 1

      Intermittent hardware errors are a bastard to try and find. Its not even a simple 'swap things out to see if that fixes the problem' like you can do when something is outright dead. You have to swap out a suspected component and the wait to see if the problem crops up, and if it doesn't, does that mean that you have fixed it, or does it mean that it just hasn't reared its intermittant head yet?

      Also, not unknown is the prospect that more than one component is damaged and is contributing to the problem, where you get into a situation where you can swap out all of the components one at a time, and nothing ever fixes it.

      The shop was being honest when the said it could be the power supply or the motherboard and they were just guessing. Thats all anyone can do in that case.

      The cost for troubleshooting this will very quickly surpass the value of the machine. Its what, 3 or 4 years old or something? Consider yourself lucky that you didn't lose your data, and move on to a new machine while you can still copy your data over.

      --
      And as you tread the halls of sanity, You feel so glad to be, Unable to go beyond. I have a message, From another time..
    6. Re:OT, but I have a tough hardware problem... by Hel+Toupee · · Score: 1

      I had a desktop unit that would randomly reboot when printing, or scanning (both USB). Or just whenever (loading webpage). Thing would also not reset (soft reboot, power not cut to the machine). After you reset it, it would just hang during POST. could be anything. Turns out the CPU (Athlon XP 1700+) was flaking out. We got a new mobo (originally thought it was this) and the chip seems to run OK on that with a 100MHz FSB and a multiplier of 10 (supposed to run at 133x11). if this is your problem, I've heard they're doing amazing things in new laptops these days. Maybe it's time for an *ahem* upgrade...

      --
      PERL:
      All of the power of Voodoo with most of the understandibility!
    7. Re:OT, but I have a tough hardware problem... by aminorex · · Score: 1

      buy another one on ebay for $200.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    8. Re:OT, but I have a tough hardware problem... by starflt · · Score: 1
      Just a thought, but if you happen to be running winnt/2k/xp, check the event logs and see if it's rebooting due to a bugcheck.

      Especially if the error condition survives multiple component replacements.

      Look here for expanded list of codes.

  53. free memory tester by intertwingled · · Score: 0, Redundant

    free memory tester here

    --
    -- SKYKING, SKYKING, DO NOT ANSWER.
    1. Re:free memory tester by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for posting the same thing that nine other people already did! I salute you!

  54. Try Belarc by RawCode · · Score: 1

    Belarc offers a free PC audit tool that I have found VERY useful in trying to discover exactly what h/w and s/w a user has installed. And it free.

  55. AIDA & PC-Config & NSSI by fudgefactor7 · · Score: 3, Informative

    A great, free, Windows program is AIDA32. It gives lots of valuable info. It's not perfect, but it's constantly in development and improvement. Up until about a week ago there was a DOS/16-bit version available, but due to lack of demand it was discontinued (sadly). Another ok program is PC-Config, which is no longer being worked on, but it's pretty good. And NSSI is really pretty nice as well.

    Check those out.

  56. My advice by dasunt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Knoppix - verify the part under another OS.

    Tomsrtbt - I forget if Knoppix has badblocks or not. If it doesn't, Tomsrtbt does.

    memtest86 - Memory tester.

    Spare HDD - good for having a clean install of windows to check things on.

    Spare low-density memory.

    Spare older computer for testing daughtercards.

    That's about it.

    Of course, sooner or later you *will* get the machine from hell with an intermediate fault that ends up locking windows for no damn good reason every so often. Then life will suck. But that's why they call it work.

  57. Always pay with a credit card by Lehk228 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you pay with a credit card and the vendor tries to screw you over you can contest the billing and return the unsatisfactory product, In fact I am in the process of cancelling an order i placed for Serif's Photoplus 7 because the site selling it never mentioned that it was old and shitty, but they were perfectly happy to tell me how bad it was when they called me asking if i wanted to pay $50-$90 to upgrade to version 8 or 9... obviously contesting the charge is a last resort but overall I feel much more confident buying software online because i know that i am not out the money untill i actually pay the credit card bill (for internet purchases there is no signature)

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    1. Re:Always pay with a credit card by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      the site selling it never mentioned that it was old and shitty

      Where was your due diligence? Did you honestly expect the site selling the software to tell you "Hey! This is old and shitty, don't buy it!"

      Caveat emptor, dude. I have trouble believing that you couldn't have discovered some known issues with the product before you bought it.

    2. Re:Always pay with a credit card by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      but then they had the nerve to call me up and basically say "the software we sold you is shit, would you like to pay 3 times as much for better software?"

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    3. Re:Always pay with a credit card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but then they had the nerve to call me up and basically say "the software we sold you is shit, would you like to pay 3 times as much for better software?"

      They sold you what you asked for. They're not in the business of protecting you from yourself. Some people want to buy older software.

      I still like Coreldraw 4. It's a good program, and does everything I need to do to create diagrams. (I'm a scientist, not a graphic artist). I don't need or want Coreldraw 10 or 11. I don't need the features & bloat. Some people do though.

      I bought a computer recently. It was hard to find a vendor that would sell it with windows 2000 installed. I told them if they can't install and support windows 2000, no sale, even though XP is newer.

      You are abusing the credit card system.

    4. Re:Always pay with a credit card by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      I am not abusing anything, i sent them an email canceling the order (the shipment has not come to me yet, the order page had a download section for the main program (not the manuals or the resouce CD) and when i got it the program was ok (not great, but not worth the bother to cancel the $20 order... it was the marketing call where thier own salesman basically said that version 7 was a POS and that I should pay another $30-$50 to upgrade to their newer versions (8 and 9), so today i sent out an email telling them that i wish to cancel the order (I do not expect to have to contest the charge.... small companies don't survive through 9 versions of their software by pissing people off deliberately) and i DO use old software, corel Draw 7, powerpoint 95, and Publisher 97

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  58. All those tools suck by foo+fighter · · Score: 4, Informative

    I was a PC repairman for many years. I say from experience that all those software diagnostics suck.

    Microscope from Micro2000 is actually the best of the bunch, but that's not saying much. If your computer won't even post, non of these tools will do you any good. (They do have some good training materials for those wanting an A+ or N+ COMPTIA cert.)

    The PCI cards that display diagnostic codes are better than the software in those cases. They still aren't very helpful though. Basically they will tell you there is a problem with the memory, or the parallel port, etc., but they won't tell you exactly what's wrong so they aren't of much use either.

    Here's my advice:
    1. Get the power supply tester from PC Power & Cooling. It's $20, and in my experience most of the time the reason a computer won't even post is because the cheapass power supply that came with the case died.
    2. Carry a bunch of known good parts: an AGP and a PCI video card you know work, a PCI network card and PCI modem, some known good RAM (PC 100 and DDR), and a good hard drive. Ideally, these are all in a fully working computer you've brought to the site so you can swap between the working computer and the not-working computer and narrow down the problem. Resist the temptation to fix the system with your known good parts; make them buy new, name-brand components with a warranty.
    3. Bring a USB keyboard and mouse. I've seen lots of 3+ year old computers have their PS/2 connections short out or stop working but their USB ports are just fine. They can solve input problems.
    4. Have a Knoppix CD in your kit. The linux forensic toolkit can be of great use recovering files and finding problems.

    --
    obviously no deficiencies vs. no obvious deficiencies
    1. Re:All those tools suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I almost completely agree that SW diags are not useful. Except for some memory and disk problems in an otherwise working machine, they have never detected marginal hardware.

      Over the past ten years I've accumulated lots and lots of computer hardware. I've noticed that some things fail more often than others. In rough order of the failures:

      1) Disk drives. Most of them were older than 4 years. The most recent additions are a bunch of Maxtor 40G drives. The failure rates on these things are atrocious.

      2) CDROM drives. They just quit working.

      3) Power supplies. The recent SuperPower ones seem to do OK. Some no-name ones I picked up at computer shows have failed.

      4) RAM

      5) Mother boards. I stay away from MSI and BioStar now since they make up the bulk of my failed boards. I'll admit that I fried one when I accidentally connected a 12V directly to the wrong jumper. "Dammit, why won't this thing fit?"

      6) Mice. Most just quit being detected. I have at least a dozen broken mice now.

      7) PCI NICs. Most are Netgears with a couple Linksys thrown in. I have a 3COM 3c509 that I suspect is bad.

      The other parts are a bunch of video cards, SCSI adapters, some tape units, etc.. So mechanical parts definitely go first and are what I keep on hand for quick swaps.

    2. Re:All those tools suck by jazmataz23 · · Score: 1

      Um, Why do you keep broken hardware? Is there some other nefarious use for a dead NIC? Explain, please, preferably with diagrams and purple prose.

      --
      Death to Argument by Slogan!! (This post twice-encrypted with ROT-13. Replies not using same will be ignored)
    3. Re:All those tools suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because I put them on a board in my garage and add pieces as I please. It's a memorial to the electron gods and a conversation piece for visiting friends. But you wouldn't know anything about that...

  59. It has been my experience by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 5, Informative

    That the free stuff is just as good (if not better) than high-priced diag software.

    Allow me to give you some background:

    I have done IT work for 4.5 years. I work with Novell, RedHat, all (disgusting) flavours of Windows, BeOS, Sun, SGI, Apple (Mac) and QNX. I support everyone from Joe Grandma to major Universities and Medical Colleges.

    I have several CDs worth of useful tools at my disposal, all of them free:

    Ad-Aware: I consider this to be my single best resource in the fight against Windows NT (and up) flakery.

    www.trendmicro.com does an on-line virus scan. Not perfect, but usually finds the major ones.

    Demos of Anti-Trojan. Again, good enough for the closing of trojan ports left open.

    AVG Anti-Virus software. Good, free AV software, if Norton isn't available.

    Winzip: Obviously a good thing, many many drivers come zipped.

    A CD full of the most common NIC drivers from the biggest vendors.

    nVidia and ATI drivers.
    Via drivers

    All the latest browsers on another CD.

    MemTestx86 (as you have found): Allow me one point further int he favor of it, major memory makers will accept their RAM bad, no questions asked (in my experience) if you tell them it was checked and found bad, via MemTextx86.

    SiSoft Sandra, if for nothing else than the CPU-Burn wizard. If the CPU is bad, Sandra will find out.

    Emergency Boot disks and cd-rom access disks (sadly, the Win98 boot disk is pretty handy)

    A live Linux and live BeOS CD (very handy for recovering data of hosed systems)

    And last, but not least, a good Google search. Another thing that has saved my skin time and again is to input exact error messages and see what Google turns up.

    This whole cd-wallet has set me back perhaps $20, and does far more than "professional" diag tools can hope to accomplish.

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
  60. Simple combination of Tools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For most uses, a very simple combination of tools works:
    If a specific device does not work, you can usually identify the problem by replacing it with a known good one (Harddrive, CD writer, whatever).
    If it is an intermittent problem, I usually check the RAM first (memtest).
    If the problem still hasn't been identified, I remove all components the system doesn't require and run some appropriate stress tests on it (24 hour burn in, or some network test, whatever is appropriate to the problem).
    If it works, I start adding in the other components one by one - and find the problem this way. If it doesn't work, the problem still has been narrowed down quite a bit: Then I rip the system apart, and mark the individual parts as suspect. So if I use them later on in non-critical systems and an error occurs, I toss them, no questions asked.
    All these steps are fairly simple, and don't involve hunting for obscure problems, yet I guess I throw very few working parts away.

  61. slightly off topic by dcocos · · Score: 1

    If you bought the product that doesn't work with your credit card and you have tried to resolve the issue with your vendor call your credit card company and explain the situation to them they will most likely help you out

  62. go build a computer by dre23 · · Score: 1
    build a computer out of parts. hell - build the power supply. then you'll learn what is broken or not. you might need a multi-meter.

    if you can install freebsd, openbsd, netbsd, fedora, gentoo, and debian on the machine, all within 24 hours - then you can count on the hardware working for awhile.

    the only device(s) i've replaced on my primary machine in 10 years is the drive(s) (none of the older drives died, but i felt i had to replace them due to their smaller size). this one time i had an obvious hardware problem, so i put in a bunch of output into a google browser and found out that I probably had to clean all the dust out of my machine and cpu-fan. good thing i didn't have to replace anything.

    that machine was made of high quality parts that i spent a few short weeks researching on what to buy and where to buy it. i used all scsi and a non-intel processor/motherboard (scsi and non-intel were more important 10 years ago than today probably).

    No software can replace the need for hardware knowledge. You are going to need to know hardware cold to run continous IT/Operations, whether Apple, Intel, or AMD/Sun.

    --
    IPv4 allocations for hobbyists? join the ipalloc-l mailing-list! www.operations.net/mailman/listinfo/ipalloc-l
  63. Diagnostic software doesn't work by edxwelch · · Score: 1

    I had a problem with a faulty SIMM. I was getting flakey video errors when running Windows. I downloaded a diagnostic (DOS) program and it tested the memory for hours without finding a single problem. Yet when I changed the SIMM the
    problems when away. I remember similar results with motherboard errors. The only diagnostic program that I have found that actually do anything useful are the disk checking programs (i.e. scandisk).

    1. Re:Diagnostic software doesn't work by sphealey · · Score: 2, Funny
      I downloaded a diagnostic (DOS) program and it tested the memory for hours without finding a single problem. Yet when I changed the SIMM the
      problems when away. I remember similar results with motherboard errors. The only diagnostic program that I have found that actually do anything useful are the disk checking programs
      I had a piece of process control equipment where the vendor kept telling me to "run the diagnostics. run the diagnostics". I actually had the diagnostics up and telling me that everything was "running great" when the flames started coming out of the air vents. Yeah, that was good for a laugh, after I found the CO2 extinguisher.

      sPh

  64. What I've found useful... by mansa · · Score: 2, Informative

    I manage a second level support group at a fairly large company. We've found that On-Track's
    Easy Recovery Professional is AWESOME. It fixes 200-some file extensions. All office suite files, zips, etc. We used it a lot on enormous PST files that would blow up at 2gb~. It fixes them in half the time of M$'s ScanPST tool.

    Further, this product will do all sorts of HDD checks, and can does great file recovery. It's saved our asses a bunch of times. Just take a read.

    It might seem kind-of expensive to someone on their own, but not to a mid-sized company. It's worth it's weight to me. They do have different licensing options and offer different/lighter versions of the product for less $$$.

    The sucky thing about it's licensing scheme is that it's based on how many drives you run it on.

    I've also heard that wininternals has an great product but if I remember correctly it was really expensive.

  65. memtest86 by mslinux · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Can't beat memtest86 for those hard to find memeory problems... it's free too.

    http://memtest86.com/

  66. Just for the record by bmac · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've had a few questions I'd love to pose to the /. community but I knew were unworthy.

    Where would you suggest such questions be posed?

    Peace & Blessings,
    bmac
    www.mihr.com

    1. Re:Just for the record by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I suggest the usenet group alt.config. Or any alt group. Those guys know everything!

  67. Re:memtest86 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, really!?

    How visionary of you to suggest it!

  68. Ultimate Boot CD by tommy_traceroute · · Score: 1

    I've found this this to be both useful and FREE. May not have all of the tools you're looking for, but it's an excellent place to start.

    --
    o 1 Sig beneath your current threshold
  69. Magic Smoke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    PC diagnostics are really two-part work. Part one is to fix the PC, and part two is to convince the luser that the machine is actually fixed. That's where the diagnostic software comes in handy. Run the software, show the luser the "problem", fix the PC, and show the luser that the problem is "fixed". I've found that a piece of paper in a luser's hand is worth hours and hours of post-fix re-diagnostics because "something" has changed.

    1. Re:Magic Smoke by iamhassi · · Score: 1
      " Part one is to fix the PC, and part two is to convince the luser that the machine is actually fixed. That's where the diagnostic software comes in handy."

      so... really all you need is some fake demo saying eveything's fine?

      Honestly I don't see where diagnostic software would be any good, if the CPU, motherboard, power supply, video card, ram and CD-ROM work well enough to boot and run the diagnostic software than what's the problem?

      You want to really diagnose any PC problem? Have working backup parts. Have a extra motherboard, video card, stick of ram, hard drive, etc all handy and just swap parts. And before I hear complaints about "but that costs $$$$$!" I didn't say it had to be expensive parts. A 6.4gig hard drive is fine to check to see if that IDE cable is still working. Pop in a old TNT AGP video card to see if the card's bad or the slot/motherboard's bad. Pop in.... well you get the idea. And once you've swapped parts in a few PCs you'll know what's wrong immediately so you won't spend hours swapping parts anymore... it's call experience.

      Software is worthless, if you need a "check PC" idiot light to tell you exactly what's wrong then you don't know what you're doing in the first place, and if your customers can't tell the PC's working by the time you leave without a piece of paper that says it's working then you didn't do a very good job.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  70. OEM Software is HANDY by karmaflux · · Score: 1

    Keep a copy of the Dell Diagnostics. This is the prime tool that their techs use to find hardware problems. Other companies have simialr products.

    --

    REM Old programmers don't die. They just GOSUB without RETURN.

  71. Best hardware diagnostic by jandrese · · Score: 4, Informative

    In my experiance, the best hardware for diagnosing PC hardware problems is another PC that you know works. Quite frankly, the built in diagnostic capabilities of PC hardware is extremely poor, the only reliable way to discover if a part if bad is to replace it with a known good part and see if that fixes the problem. Don't blindly trust new or especially refurbished parts either, they need to be tested and known good. With experiance you will know what parts to try first, but it is still important to verify that replacing the failed component with a new part fixes the problem.

    I remember back at school where the tech support guys were ripping their hair out because a lot of the school issued PCs were coming back with random crashing problems. (I had a roommate who's machine would crash everytime the screensaver kicked in). They were replacing parts left and right and it never seemed to fix the problem. My roommate had everything replaced except the case at one part, and it still crashed on a vanilla Win3.1 install. It took them awhile to realize that most of the machines had bad memory, and the vendor supplied replacement memory for the systems was usually bad as well. I eventually loaned my roommate my memory sticks, and when his system didn't crash he went back to the PC guys and told them exactly what the problem was and made them continue swapping in RAM sticks until they finally found one that worked (apparently the RAM was OK in their hardware RAM tester, but failed once it was actually put in PCs. They suspected the same thing was happening at the vendors end. They would get bad memory, test it and not discover a problem, then ship it right back to the school.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  72. Not really "affordable", but damn good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.uxd.com/phdpci.shtml

  73. Mac version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    echo "the presence of this routine has doubled the number of diagnostic programs available for the mac"

    1. Re:Mac version by newandyh-r · · Score: 1

      Funny you should say that - I was just about to ask about similar diagnostic programs for Macs. Is this cynical answer correct? or is there anything worth looking-at? Andy

  74. 911 rescue CD by Aarondeep · · Score: 2, Informative

    I would check out the 911 rescue CD if you cannot figure out how to use a knoppix CD.

    http://www.911cd.net

    You will have to download all the tools required seperately and have your own windows CDs to create the boot images on a single disk.

    Check it out it's a freeware project.

  75. sysinternals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    http://www.sysinternals.com/

  76. Get your money back by tbase · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I presume you ordered the software over the phone - mail order products are covered by a 30 day money back guarantee by law - unless they changed the laws. Call your credit card company or bank if you charged in on a credit or debit card, and dispute the charges. Although that might not be required if you call them and let them know you'll be disputing the charges if they don't issue a refund.

    --

    666-607: 6th floor apartment of the beast
    1. Re:Get your money back by RebornData · · Score: 1

      Actually, this is exactly what I'm doing. Unfortunately, opened software is exempt from a lot of return policies... we'll see what happens.

      -R

    2. Re:Get your money back by tbase · · Score: 1

      Guess their crappy software is the reason they don't have a demo. Good luck!

      --

      666-607: 6th floor apartment of the beast
    3. Re:Get your money back by cmpalmer · · Score: 1

      As the message below indicates, return policies for opened software are a bit more stringent thanks to anti-piracy paranoia.

      However, threatening to dispute the charges with your credit card company will often force businesses to reconsider their position. As I understand it, too many contested charges and the business can lose their ability to process credit card transactions -- something that would sink most mail-order businesses (and many retail ones as well).

      --
      -- stream of did I lock the front door consciousness
  77. Re:memtest86 by DrMindWarp · · Score: 2, Informative
    I thought were weren't supposed to RTFA. This is Slashdot - a write mostly medium.

    Anyway, certainly he *mentions* memtest86 but he didn't say that he used it - wanting 'something more comprehensive'. I am suggesting that he shouldn't be so dismissive given that experience suggests testing the memory properly is a good place to start.

    Why he wants a costly, all-in-one package rather than a comprehensive set of free tools seems peculiar to me (and to other posters).

    He didn't mention memtest86+ either.

  78. microscope by SHaFT7 · · Score: 2, Informative

    i use microscope. my business bought it, and its a $600 buy in a believe. comes with a POST card (very handy for troubleshooting non-POSTing mobo's and a bootable diskette that does all kinds of good testing. we also got it on cd for an extra $10. i use it all the time. for testing harddrives, i use seatools from seagate on bootable cd.

  79. IBM'S PC Doctor by Stubby · · Score: 3, Informative

    We are an IBM shop (By state mandate) so I am a bit biased. You said manufacturer versions are model specific, but I doubt IBM's is, because they use the same PC doctor program for the last 10 years worth of laptops, workstations and x86 based Servers. It comes on a bootable floopy (or on servers a bootable partition just for it). It does full HD, floppy, CD, and memory scans. It will test the standard AT external ports (Parallel, Serial, PS/2) It runs VGA mode scans, and will test some features of the AGP port. Admittably it won't test stuff like sound cards, or many built-ins, but I doubt any Paid program would either.

    To find it go to IBM support pages and start looking for Diagnostics, you will eventually find it.

  80. QuickTech Pro from Ultra-X by starwindsurfer · · Score: 1

    We (me personale and the shop i work in) have been using Quick Tech Pro from Ultra-X. Its a british company, and their stuff is not cheap. They have full blown hardware diagnostic boards, but all i use is the software. It accuratly identifes problems on all PCs ive run it on. Our copy is from when AMD K5 was the fastest processor out there, and it is shtill very relevat and helpull, it preforms a litany of tests and provides very detailed information.

    http://www.uxd.com/

    --
    If you resist reading what you disagree with, how will you ever acquire deeper insights into your own beliefs?
    1. Re:QuickTech Pro from Ultra-X by bdoga · · Score: 2, Informative

      I work for a mid sized county in Utah, and we are also using Qukck Tech Pro. it was a little on the pricy side, it was about $900 for the diag. software and a hardware pci post/test card, I believe that you can get the software alone for about $400, the test card rocks, it has all of their diagnostics software built on to the board, and a svga video connector so you can plug it in and power up your machine, with only the motherboard,cpu, and the diag card in the machine, (Yes it also has ram onboard) Very useful for finding crazy bugs on your hardware. Ultra-x also claims that they are used by Intel,AMD,.....etc in their test labratories.

    2. Re:QuickTech Pro from Ultra-X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a freelance consultant/everything else, I purchased just the Quicktech Pro software (all I have to do is keep 1 floppy with me for everything) and have had really good luck using it over the past few years, I was on a tight budget too.

  81. I suggest best buy by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

    When I'm troubleshooting problems for my family. I like to just head on over to best buy and buy whatever I think is bad, then I can install it, and test it, if it really is bad, then I can ask them if they want me to order the part cheaper and wait, or use the overpriced crap. If its not bad, then I just take it back to best buy and say it doesn't perform to my expectations, and get a full refund.

  82. Troubleshooting tips by NinjaPablo · · Score: 1

    For testing hard drives, use the install disk you can get from the manufacturer's web site. For memory, Memtest86. Cards and ram, you should have extras to swap out and test. If the system isn't POSTing, get a POST card. No software needed.

    --
    SmashTech - No smashing of tech involved
  83. If you paid Micro 2000 by credit card, and online. by hsoft · · Score: 1

    You can issue a chargeback. Before you do that, e-mail Micro 2000 and tell them that if they don't refund you, you will chargeback. If they still don't refund, take your credit card invoice, go to your bank, and tell them you never authorized this transaction. Since it is an online transaction, you never signed anything, so they don't have any proof of your authorization. It works. I'm a RegNow vendor, and they regulary get chargebacks (and they have no choice but to refund. They even get a penalty for having issued a false transaction).Micro 2000 fucked with you, so fuck with them.

    Note that I'm not promoting false chargebacks, but if a company says it has a 30 days guarantee and doesn't honor it... well they deserve that.

    --
    perception is reality
  84. Re:feh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    meh, boxen, virii, [insert any word here] anyone?

    OK, you can kick my ass now.

  85. OSS Tools by MeBadMagic · · Score: 1

    I recently was looking around for backup solutions. The folks over at ltsp (ltsp) recomended mondo/mindi for a backup solution. Mindi is a linux system duplicator, however they seemed to have made a bootable Mindi CD with memtest86 allong with a few other utilities that seem quite comprehensive. Check it out here. ( mindi.iso) )

    --
    A friend will come and bail you out of jail, a true friend will be sitting next to you saying, "damn that was fun!"
  86. Not useful by NineNine · · Score: 0, Troll

    That's assuming that Knoppix even has support for the hardware being tested. That's a big "if". That's a pretty poor way to test hardware, if you ask me.

    1. Re:Not useful by Zeriel · · Score: 1

      Do you do anything but troll? Seriously.

      Anyway, of course a Knoppix (or ANY OTHER HARDWARE TEST DISC) is going to be limited to the hardware it supports. It's just common sense--before you choose a hardware test methodology, make sure that methodology supports all the hardware on your machine.

      Knoppix does pretty well in that regard, since it has never failed to detect a piece of hardware for me personally--ymmv, of course. It's also a bit weak for graphics diagnostics, as it can't really exercise the 3d functions of newer cards IIRC.

      --
      "America has done some terrible things. But I know that Americans don't cheer when innocents die." -Dave Barry
  87. software by bendsley · · Score: 1

    I work at Best Buy part time as a Service Technician. We have been using PC Certify until recently we just quit, as a store. It sucks. Anything over 256 ram it misreports, doesn't notice anything higher than a P3 or lower mhz thunderbird. We use Knoppix, and three other cd's we ordered off of the internet to do any troubleshooting now found out within a few minutes. If you would like copies of the three other cd's we use, I am more than happy to accomodate. Email me at my profile email account.

    --
    Alcohol & calculus don't mix. Never drink & derive.
    1. Re:software by llzackll · · Score: 1

      I also work there as a service technician. The version of PC Certify we are "supposed" to use is about 5 years old! (Just a warning to anyone that takes their computer there for repair). If I remember correctly, it also will not recognize the full capacity of larger hard drives. I've found that diagnostic software is almost useless when it comes to diagnosing hardware problems. With the exceptions being memtest86, spinrite, and hard drive manufacturer's own diagnostic utilities. I use aida32 for identifying drivers for unknown hardware, and PE builder a lot for using chkdsk to fix "unmountable boot volume" blue screens on 2000/XP machines.

      What are those 3 cd's you use? I couldn't find your email address.

  88. Alternative medicine by amightywind · · Score: 5, Funny
    Has anyone found something that works for you?

    I have found variations of the Hopi rain dance to be effective in solving many PC hardware problems. Tibetan chanting also work well.

    --
    an ill wind that blows no good
    1. Re:Alternative medicine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's the chant I use:

      Ima Hopi
      Ima Hopi
      To fix this PC
      So I dont look Dopey

      lather rinse repeat...

    2. Re:Alternative medicine by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      I've found that software problems are best solved with the sacrifice of a chicken.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    3. Re:Alternative medicine by liquidsin · · Score: 4, Funny

      A friend's (now ex) girlfriend had an issue with her computer a few years back. She'd had somebody try to fix some problem, which he fixed, but in the process managed to make the cd-rom and soundcard unuseable. So he and I set about trying to make everything work. A few hours in, we decided our brains needed a break, so we went swimming. Laying in the sun made us thirsty and lazy, so we started doing shots of tequila. Hours later, we drunkenly went back to work and decided wicca was the only solution. When we sobered up we had ashtrays full of burnt down incense sticks, candles melted into puddles in a circle around us, and a computer with a fully functional cd-rom and soundcard - and no fucking clue how it got that way.

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    4. Re:Alternative medicine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Outstanding ! And so holistic !
      A little more harsh perhaps, but I have performed several "miracle cures" by shaking my smaller toolbox in front of the machine so that the contents jingle ... the Inquisition used to call this " the showing of the instruments".

    5. Re:Alternative medicine by Woy · · Score: 1
      There's always power-cord bungee for when you need scare those viruses away.

      --
      "If God created us in his own image we have more than reciprocated." - Voltaire
    6. Re:Alternative medicine by yuri+benjamin · · Score: 1

      When I start swearing at the computer my wife quietly taps me on the shoulder and suggests praying. She prays. I pray. Then I get back to fixing it and it works.

      --
      You make the mistake of thinking you can educate the fundamental stupidity out of people. You can't.
  89. Re:Not many PC maintenance people use any diagnost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To be honest I'm not surprised that the guys that sell this software/hardware are con artists. What they sell is Snake Oil, to people who want a magic bullet. If the CPU's BIST (Built-In Self Test) and HIMEM/MEMTEST can't find a problem, some third part app isn't going to find it.

    The only way to do this is to systematically change things until you isolate the failing part. The longer you've done it, the better your instincts will be as to where to start.

    Isolating the effect is not the same as determining the cause.

  90. Try AIDA by ziad · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hi, I recommend AIDA as a Sysinfo tool. Free and powerful, can even run in batch mode.
    http://www.aida32.hu/aida32.php

    Ziad

  91. Quite true...and another truth... by cnelzie · · Score: 2, Informative

    I definately agree that diagnosing computer problems is something can take years of experience and can become quite instinctual, part of that is having a good long-term memory and being able to put into memory the results of previous diagnostic work.

    The other truth I wish to share is that you MUST under ALL circumstances get things a Salesperson says to you in WRITING before agreeing to purchase ANYTHING. I work as a Purchasing Agent primarily and I tell you what... Salespeople are often far worse then mythical Genies, they will twist everything you say and turn your own purchase orders against you if you don't have them worded just right and don't cover all the bases as well...

    --
    If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
  92. Don't pay for software! by Vincman · · Score: 1

    At least not at first. Most respectable programs will have a trial version out. And there are plenty of freeware/open source alternatives.
    Good programs, I've encountered have been RegSupreme, Norton SystemWorks, AdAware, SpyBot, and numerous others.

  93. Experience is Key by hop_dat_buddy · · Score: 1

    The reason you can't find software to do it is because there is enough people out there who know how to fix these buggers a lot quicker. Having replacement parts on hand helps but after you seen a few hundred computers not boot(amoung other problems) you start to get the feel for it and software (espiecially in this context) will never be as good as experience. It helps to get this experience on your own machines. I've been fixing computers for close to seven years now and I've never even looked for this kind of software.

    1. Re:Experience is Key by gothzilla · · Score: 1

      I have to agree with buddy here. Do a little math. Locally, pc repair runs $60/hr. The little local computer store sells a new pc (box only) minus hard drive and O/S for $350. Thats 6 hours of labor. Based on these numbers, I give myself 1 hour to find a problem. If I can't find it then its not cost effective to repair it, since repair will take at least 1 hour as well. The 3rd time a computer breaks, we replace it. Reinstalling windows and all applications can take more than 6 hours so whats the point? Might as well spend that time reinstalling on a new box that won't break. PC repair is not cost effective at all for any serious problems, which is why so many small computer repair stores are folding up. My advice, dont spend ANY money on diagnostics (except for spinrite for hard drives), get a free ram tester (even microsoft has one out), and start teaching people that you don't repair something thats cheaper to replace.

  94. Ontrack by Trollificus · · Score: 1

    I recently used Ontrack Easy Recovery Pro to recover data from a hard disk in which the file system inforation was completely destroyed by corruption. Booting the disk as a slave in Windows gave me nothing more than a hardware ID in device manager. The disk wouldn't populate or even assign a drive letter. I had to do a raw bit-by-bit recovery which took over 12 hours, but I got every last piece of data off that disk(of course, I couldn't get directory info or original file names, but the data itself was intact).

    --

    "People should be allowed to keep midgets as pets."
    - Gov. Jesse Ventura

  95. Older hardware. by Associate · · Score: 1

    Um, the machine I use at work can't boot to CD. What am I to do now?

    --
    Someone hates these cans.
  96. Nothing beats personal judgement. by krunk7 · · Score: 1
    I know you balked at basic programs like memtest86, but in my experience a copy of memtest86 for memory, prime95 for CPU, a copy of knoppix (or any livecd with lspci), maybe a graphic intensive program for video and a decent POST card are all you need. Oh and PSU tester as well. I can't count how many times problems have been traced back to a PSU that was going bad.

    The more complicated the test the more likely that what's causing the errors is the test and not the hardware.

    1. Re:Nothing beats personal judgement. by topsoil · · Score: 1

      In Windows, to find simular information to what lspci provides, open up regedit and visit

      (Win9x): hkey_local_machine\enum\pci

      and you will see all the PCI devices listed there, like such:

      VEN_0000&DEV_1111&SUBSYS_22222222&REV_ 33

      You can type the vendor ID (0000) into http://www.pcidatabase.com to find out who manufactures the card/chip, and then do a 'find' on the resulting page for the device id (1111) to see which specific card/chip is being used.

      (I've always used 0x0000 for vendor, I'm not sure if just 0000 will work.)

      Also, if you expand those keys, you will be able to see the device description by looking at the keys below.

      This applies to WinNT/XP/2k/etc as well, however I believe the registry key is different.

  97. Simple solution by Treacle+Treatment · · Score: 1

    I have had several bootable Linux CDs that truly give a wealth of information on the status, identity, and health of PCs. They are cheap and can often point you in the right direction when you are having some hardware issues. If I was doing this for a living I would always carry one around with me.

    --
    TT
  98. Ultimate Boot CD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    www.ultimatebootcd.com

    Free and includes loads of software. .::Dread

  99. Good reasons for other software. by Astrogen · · Score: 1

    Some of you have wondered what do you need with more than a memory tester, and a disk surface scan?

    Have you never encountered PC's that have perfectly working hard drives, and memory, but the machine keeps crashing?

    I've had a few, among the culprits a microfracture on the motherboard, a PCI slot that was sending the wrong data, corrupt video memory, a corrupt bios etc.

    If I could put a disk into the machine and find out a few hours later exactly what the problem is that would be great.

    I've been doing this for a while and I have my instincts, 99% of the time they are right, but when it's I figure out its not problem A like I figured it would be, I know its b, c, d, or e; that doesn't save me the 2 days of troubleshooting.

    Anywho - finding a good diagnostic tool, software or hardware that could help deduce this stuff without my constant attention would be great.

  100. Re:Not many PC maintenance people use any diagnost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    To be honest I'm not surprised that the guys that sell this software/hardware are con artists. What they sell is Snake Oil, to people who want a magic bullet. If the CPU's BIST (Built-In Self Test) and HIMEM/MEMTEST can't find a problem, some third part app isn't going to find it.

    Wrong. These tests are designed to be *fast*, not *comprehensive*. A true memory tester takes a lot longer to run than the POST test, because it's a more thorough check. The POST test in particular is useless for finding most memory errors.

    If you're relying on POST to diagnose memory problems then you're nothing more than an ignorant hack.

  101. Re:Not many PC maintenance people use any diagnost by RebornData · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I was hoping for something that would save me time, but suspected this was the case. I've had the dell diags save my bacon a few times when there was strange damage to parallel ports and the like, and was hoping to find a general-case tool. I do all on-site work so I'm on the clock in front of the customer, which means that there's huge time pressure and even a quick way to comprehensively discriminate between driver and hardware issues (especially with video hardware in laptops) would be a boon.

    -R

  102. Knoppix Live CD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I prefer this, it is easy to carry, gives me full access and has a full suite of tools and applications.

    Oh, and its free.

  103. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why all these software suggestions to a hardware problem? You want my advice? Make a dummy load, get a meter and a cheap scope, and look at the power supply alone first.

  104. Isn't that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...what the rubber chicken was invented for?

  105. For exhaustive memory testing, Suntory Memtest86 by schmaltz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    memtest86 gives you a bootable floppy that will scan *all* RAM in a system, and turns up the most obscure memory errors. Some errors are not consistent, they only appear in transitions from one bit pattern to another, for example. Or adjacent bit cells may bias the bit in question.

    That's all it does, but it's good. And it's free. One other point, systems with mismatched parts (designed for different bus speeds or timings), and overclocked systems, may generate memory errors. Since I started using memtest86, I've stopped overclocking, as every single overclocked system I've checked has shown errors under memtest86!

    --
    Big Daddy, Johnny, Burp, Aunt Zelda, Scott, Slurp, Big Momma ... where's Siggy?
  106. Re:memtest86 by ceeam · · Score: 2, Informative

    I use memtest86 quite a lot (well, sometimes we are all asked to "look at a computer", you know...). I think it's one _great_ piece of diag software. But I knew nothing about memtest86+! (I thought memtest86 got frozen). Quite informative for me - gonna try that home tonight.

  107. QuickTech, OnTrack ESR and SpinRite by dlur · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm lead tech at a smallish computer shop. Over the years we've used just about everything to aid us in diagnosing hardware issues. The ones we use most are:

    QuickTech Pro - This is great for testing memory, serial ports, video RAM, and just about every other problem that you can experience. In the past we've had so many problems with recieving bad RAM from our vendors that we now run the quick memory test from QuickTech on every PC before it leaves our shop.

    OnTrack is simply the best when it comes to data recovery. They aren't cheap, but for a small-medium business their software is well worth the price. We've also purchased some of the MS Office add-ins to help us recover corrupted Word/Excel documents better. This program really works, and if it can't recover something off a failing drive (or something that a user deleted by accident) then Ontrack will almost certainly be able to recover the data at their facilities (for a steep price of course).

    I'm not a huge fan of the guy that wrote SpinRite, but if you've got a FAT(16/32) partitioned drive that seems to be failing, this tool is great. It will recover bad sectors off most drives (not seagate), especially the ones that happen when Win9x doesn't get shut down properly due to a power surge or the like. This software is free and takes a very long time to run at its highest level.

    Other than these 3 programs and a few other niche utilities we generally diagnose all other problems by having known good hardware and swapping out to see if the problem still exists. It is still, without a doubt, the best way to diagnose a hardware problem other than Technician's intiuition.

    --
    Duris MUD - The best pkill MUD. Ever.
  108. Post their software by orange · · Score: 1

    Hey,

    If they refused to take their software back after agreeing to, I'd simply make an ISO image (or some other easily distributable form) and post it, so that others can see their crud before they get bitten by the same scum tactics.

    you might want to drown your lawyer before using this as anything like advice.

  109. My favorite PC repair tool? by Spencerian · · Score: 3, Funny

    These wonderful utilities are versatile, come in many sizes, and assure me that my @!$%@&! PC never, ever gives me an error message again!

    --
    Vos teneo officium eram periculosus ut vos recipero is.
    1. Re:My favorite PC repair tool? by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 1

      Ahh yes, the old non-volatile reprogramming tool... They can do wonders for a flakey hard drive. A few good whacks and suddenly you get a warrenty replacement!

      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
    2. Re:My favorite PC repair tool? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      These wonderful utilities are versatile, come in many sizes, and assure me that my @!$%@&! PC never, ever gives me an error message again!

      Letmeguess, this what you tell your relatives when they ask you to fix up their machines...

      -cmh

    3. Re:My favorite PC repair tool? by john82 · · Score: 1

      Ahh yes, a Mk.1 series RF tuner. This tool is indispensible for precise analog tuning of recalcitrant feed horns on such classics as the AN/TPS-43E Height Finder Radar. If the Mk.1 is not a correct fit, I suggets the slightly larger Mk.2 (25 lbs) with the ball peen attachment.

      I understand from the security folks that the Mk.2 is also an excellent reformatter for EOL'd hard drives.

  110. Cost too much monety to pay a REAL IT consultant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Real IT consultants do not troubleshoot hardware. They buy either dell or compaq hardware and use that. Most IT consultants charge between $120 - $170 hour. To pay that for three hours to find out the harddrive is bad is crazy. It is just cheaper to buy a new comptuer. Playing PC tech as an IT consultant is basicly ripping off the customers time and your time. First off they should not be buying white boxes. Second off you should not be selling them white boxes. That means they are buying dell or compaq or hp under a 3 year parts warranty. Just get on the phone tell them they need to ship them another computer. Do not mess around with listening to what ever they have to say. Explain it to them clearly, ship me a new one and i will ship you this one back.

  111. Memtest86 by 0x1337 · · Score: 1

    MemTest86 - a VERY GOOD memory tester. Does not need an OS to work. Boots with LILO (and GRUB). Nice and graphical (ncursy-like). Can work without a graphics card, using the serial port as an interface to a terminal. http://www.memtest86.com/

  112. One word: by wampus · · Score: 1

    magic.

    Seriously. I've tried Knoppix, but I fail to see why everyone is creaming their jeans over it. It was a slow KDE desktop, and I binned it as soon as I realized it had no drivers for my NIC.

  113. odors by maxbang · · Score: 1

    I like to smell the the computer first to make sure nothing's blown or burnt out. This is moot if I've seen the part blow up, like the IBM monitor from 1985. Both methods are free and efficient. I also use a laser to diagnose light bulbs that have burned filaments.

    --
    I also reply below your current threshold.
    1. Re:odors by llzackll · · Score: 1

      This might work sometimes. But if you've seen my customer's computers. 50% of them are littered with cigarette smoke-dust. This pretty much masks any other smell.

  114. AMIDiag by GRW · · Score: 1

    AMIDiag from American Megatrends has been around for a long time. It has Windows and DOS versions. The DOS version will run on DRDOS. I used to use it when I was building servers for a former employer.

  115. Benchmarking Tools... by ave19 · · Score: 1

    In adition to the other good advice here, I'd bring up that a benchmarking program like PCMark2002 can sometimes point you in the direction of a problem. (http://www.futuremark.com/)

    If your computer's memory score just tanked when compared to your baseline benchmark, you might wanna test the ram first. :)

    -ave

    --
    ...or maybe not.
  116. It's supposed to be hardware by brucmack · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That whole string of stuff you listed is almost completely software-based, while the posting asks about hardware. Besides Sandra and memtest86, you've got nothing there that would be of any use... Software problems are generally easier to solve since you can always format the disk and start over anyway.

    Besides, is it legal to have a Win98 boot disk without having purchased Win98? I wouldn't think so, and this makes your $20 price tag inaccurate, especially since you're implying that you have other Windows boot disks as well.

    1. Re:It's supposed to be hardware by Asterisk · · Score: 1

      Actually, the title of this article is "Good, Affordable PC Diagnostic Software?"

    2. Re:It's supposed to be hardware by Asterisk · · Score: 1

      And of course it's legal to have win98 boot disks. Any Win98 system can create as many boot floppies as you want it to buy doing a "format /s" or by selecting "make MS-DOS boot disk" in the GUI format dialog. Neiter option makes you accept a EULA or anything similar.

    3. Re:It's supposed to be hardware by shepd · · Score: 1

      >I wouldn't think so, and this makes your $20 price tag inaccurate, especially since you're implying that you have other Windows boot disks as well.

      Good point. I know we've had to pay people to take away boat anchors from where I previously worked (with Win98 installed, of course).

      So, yeah, the price is probably less than $20. :-)

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    4. Re:It's supposed to be hardware by brucmack · · Score: 1

      The premise of PC diagnostics software is simple: provide an easy way to test for PC hardware problems, independent of software configuration.

      Did you read the posting?

    5. Re:It's supposed to be hardware by brucmack · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but each one of those floppies contains a stripped down hybrid of DOS/Win98. I can make as many copies of my Windows XP CD as I want, but it doesn't make that legal either. And I don't have to accept an EULA to run my burning software either.

  117. OT: Get it in writing by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Anytime you accept something with the option of returning it, get it in WRITING..

    swerving back on topic: perhaps its time for a set of OSS tools for diagnostics.. some parts exist now, such as memtest86.....

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  118. Re:Memtest86 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow! What's the name of this program?

    How did you learn of it? It's so obscure!

    You're a dummy lol

  119. CheckIt Diagnostics by Smith Micro Software by zitsky · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm surprised that no one has mentioned CheckIt Diagnostics from Smith Micro Software (http://www.smithmicro.com). You will find it on their website listed under the Utilities section. CheckIt Diagnostics only costs $70. I bought my copy at a local computer store a few years ago.

    What I like about it is that in the same box you get both a version that boots and runs from a single DOS boot floppy, as well as a Windows version on a CD ROM. I almost never use the Windows version because the DOS version is very comprehensive. The only complaint I have is that I can't find a way in the DOS version to make the diagnostics run "n" number of times. Their memory test is very thorough, but I'd like to leave the whole thing running for a few days. Maybe they've corrected that in newer versions?

    They don't have an eval version on their web site, but maybe you can contact their sales department about getting one. Please note that they now have a product called CheckIt86 which has nothing to do with the DOS version (e.g. 8086) but is an ad-blocker.

    1. Re:CheckIt Diagnostics by Smith Micro Software by egoots · · Score: 1

      I concur.

      I have used various versions of this one over the years. Primarily for memory testing and for com port testing.

      Most windows-based (Win2K/XP) memory-testing diagnostics have to boot into DOS to do their tests anyways, as the OS makes it near impossible (as it should) to read and write some physical memory locations for these kind of tests

  120. Someone else please recommend memtest86! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    God knows nobody else has!

  121. Last time I used something like this... by werdy · · Score: 1

    ...was...well...a long time ago. But at the time AMI Diag was pretty good. It is still available, but I'm not sure how good the current version is.

    --
    The heights of genius are only measurable by the depths of stupidity
  122. Dell Diagnostics by ajorge · · Score: 1

    The Dell Diagnostics are free to download and (last I checked) work on non-Dell PCs as well. They test just about everything you could think of and with a little work you can burn it all onto a bootable CD.

    An IBM service tech told me that's they use.

  123. Biggest cause of failure in old PC: Bad contacts by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 4, Insightful


    Agreed: Try known good parts.

    To prove to yourself that it really is fixed, use a memory tester, the hard disk manufacturer's disk diagnostics, and either a program that reboots an OS 20 seconds after it is loaded (on Windows XP, Wizmo from GRC.com and Sleep.exe from the resource kit) or, even better, some Linux or BSD build process that takes several hours.

    The biggest cause of failure in an old PC: Bad contacts. Just move every card and connector 2 millimeters out and in again. The rubbing of metal to metal creates fresh contact surfaces. Renewing the contacts should be the first step in fixing any PC.

    The biggest cause of real failure in a new PC: Infant failure. Components are more than 100 times more likely to fail in the first week than they are in the 100 weeks after that.

  124. Good Diag Software by ThurstonMoore · · Score: 2, Informative

    I use a combination of Memtest and Maxtor's Powerdiag software. Maxtor's software will work on any brand hard drive and has fixed quite a few non bootable hard drives long enough to get them Ghosted over to new drives. As for Micro2000, just last week I had a defective IDE controller that passed Micro2000's diagnostic tests just fine, but killed 2 hard drives. Micro2000's memory tests also miss a lot of errors that Memtest finds.

  125. S/w-based h/w diagnostics is an oxymoron by sunaj · · Score: 2, Informative

    The reason I'vd found for this is quite simply that a piece of software can't possibly report correctly on a hardware problem, especially an intermittant one ( a klingon!). It's self defeating to expect software to find a problem with hardware. That's NOT to say that software testers don't have their place; they are great for burn-ins and torture tests.

    I will most often have found and fixed a problem long before a diagnostic is ready to report. And if it is an extremely hard or intermittant problem, the diagnostics are not going to help anyway! I've found even harware-based diagnostics (you know those units that plug in to an ISA/EISA/PCI/whatever slot), to be ineffective as well; they work great when the hardware is fine, but fall over without a useful result when it's not. Think about it. As some others have said here, nothing beats the old noggin' as the best diagnostic software available (I guess we'd have to call it "wetware" though!).

  126. Free Microsoft Windows Memory Diag by bubblegoose · · Score: 2, Informative

    Microsoft offers a freebie memory tester

    Supposedly pretty good, it boots off a floppy or CD so it looks like it will run under Linux. I haven't had a chance to try it myself yet.

    --
    I hope that someday we will be able to put away our fears and prejudices and just laugh at people. - Jack Handey
    1. Re:Free Microsoft Windows Memory Diag by daina · · Score: 1
      Microsoft also makes a great for-pay memory tester: Microsoft Office.

      Many, many times over the years when I have suspected bad memory but the usual tools (I own Micro Scope and a few others) don't indicate a problem, MS Office has boldly crashed where no other software dared to go.

      Swap out the memory for known good, and it runs fine. Mostly, my customers were complaining about one MS product or another crashing, anyway, so this was a "real-world" test.

      Strangely, it doesn't seem to matter much which application, though for improved reliability I usually start up Word, Excel and Access at the same time. It usually isn't necessary even to do anything with them. Sometimes it is helpful to turn off cache.

      Even better, the user often owns a copy of the "diagnostic software".

      Actually, I haven't used MS Office for any other purpose for a long time.

  127. No kidding by rs79 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I used to write diagnostic software for computer companies in the early 80s. If the computer was together enough to run my software there was not that much that could be wrong with it and very little I could find.

    Keep in mind typical diagnostic sofware back then would test for things like memory not really being there (bad address or data line problem) or interrupts stuck on or not happening when they should or can't talk to the disk drive.

    None of this crap really helps is you have a bad scsi cable (ouch, that was a long drawn out pig) or a bad cable or the wrong cache controller chip (ouch) or a bad power supply or wrong speed RAM any of which will cause a system to beheva erratically and in a - and this is the bad part - non repeatable way.

    Back then almost every part was $8000, these days the answer to "how do I fix a flakey computer" is "buy a new one".

    --
    Need Mercedes parts ?
  128. Re:memtest86 by gimpboy · · Score: 2, Informative

    MemTestx86 (as you have found): Allow me one point further int he favor of it, major memory makers will accept their RAM bad, no questions asked (in my experience) if you tell them it was checked and found bad, via MemTextx86.

    i'd like to second this. i had some crucial ram giving me trouble so i called their tech support folks, told them memtest86 failed, and they were quite satisfied. it turns out that our motherboard came with two different chipsets. the chipset we had was incompatable with the memory they sent and they crossshiped the replacement.

    --
    -- john
  129. Auto backup? by evilty · · Score: 1

    Anyone know of a good auto backup program? One that would say, let me pick which folders get backed-up, pick where they get backed up to, and how often this backup happens? One that runs in Windows possibly?

    1. Re:Auto backup? by Threni · · Score: 1

      I don't know of a product offhand, but that process is generally called replication, so maybe use that in a Google search.

  130. Unless you can't: Re:...all basically useless... by D3 · · Score: 1

    I agree as well. I used to do support for the USDA-FSIS. It is much more time and cost effective for a large support shop (>3000 end users to support when I was ther) to have a few spares lying around to just do a quick swap. Why run diagnostics for hours/days when you can put a new modem or NIC in there in 5 minutes and be done?

    Now, if you are trying to run a small PC repair place and can't have the overhead of equivalent parts lying around the software MIGHT be useful. Even then, there are other diagnostics you can do with the proper knowledge and background. However, this still takes lots of time. With hardware so cheap, if you burn up 4-8 hours of time at $50/hour the customer should be pissed.

    --
    Do really dense people warp space more than others?
  131. What About Diagnostic Software for Macs? by Walrus99 · · Score: 1

    Any thoughts on diagnostic software for Mac OSX?

    McAffe? DiskWarrior? Norton?

    1. Re:What About Diagnostic Software for Macs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Macs ship with a hardware test cd-rom.

      Diskwarrior for everything else.

  132. $500 for diagnostic software? by RayBender · · Score: 1
    Why not just go to Fry's and buy a new macine? ;)

    --
    Human genome = 3 billion base pairs = 6 GBit. Windows + Office = 20 Gbit. Which is more impressive?
  133. Re:Sandra - NO GOOD by freeze128 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sandra has some uses, but it, like a lot of other "hardware diagnostics" software, has a HUGE disadvantage.... It expects your operating system to be in good working order. It also expects that you have current (and appropriate) drivers installed for all your hardware. Any good technician already knows the tenet "Divide and conquer". When troubleshooting, you want to know if the problem is caused by the hardware or the software. If your software is screwed up, how can you trust the diagnostics to properly report that the HARDWARE is good?
    Likewise, anyone can write a driver bad enough to make the video tests fail, but that doesn't mean the video card is actually defective.

    Years ago, I worked at a PC manufacturer and we used QAPLUS FE. It was small enough to fit on a floppy disk, and had modules for all the independant subsystems: CPU, RAM, VIDEO, IO Ports, Timer channels, interrupts, Hard disk... You could select all the tests and let it run all night. If it failed on something, it actually gave you an idea on what might be the problem.
    I would recommend QAPLUS if they had an up-to-date version that booted from a CD and had it's own KNOWN GOOD drivers for hardware. A Plus would be some sort of modular technology that would allow you to add drivers for more hardware in the future.

  134. Thanks ! by Onan+The+Librarian · · Score: 1

    Well, I'll try doing what I can, but I agree with the summary re: intermittent problems. I can buy a used 4150 for less than quoted repair costs, but I don't have the moolah either way. I'll check for a power regulator, and I'll do the Knoppix check too. It's been a handy machine, I'll try to keep it working. Thanks for the suggestions and comments !

    1. Re:Thanks ! by Jordan+Block · · Score: 1

      HP notebooks also have built in diagonstic software. Iirc it's F10 at the boot screen (or maybe F6 - its been a while)

  135. load test your power supply by muckdog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I it was Antec that recently put out a power supply tester. It basically an LED and a few resistors with a harness for like $15 or $25 (I forget). You still need a multimeter to test it but if you get you +/-12V and +/-5V while underload you should have a good power supply. I haven't personally used it yet but I plan to pick one up at some point.

  136. WHat?! by Orien · · Score: 5, Informative
    I sure hope you are trying to troll, because I just don't get that at all.

    If you come to a computer that needs work and you boot into a Knoppix CD you get...a desktop. On the other hand if you boot on to something like the ultimate boot cd you get a nice menu broken down by category of things like "File system utilities", "Memory Tests", and "Hard drive cloning". I just don't see how Knoppix can compare to that. I'm willing to listen though, if you care to explain what makes it so great for this.

    1. Re:WHat?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like...linux!!!1
      Linux=pwnage!!!!!!!1

      BTW m$ windoz=teh suck!!1 loolooolooolo

  137. PCI testing card for hardware troubleshooting by tweakr · · Score: 1

    I was a tech support person for years, and had the same trouble trying to find a diag. product that was really useful. One thing that I ran across (but never had a chance to test) that may be worth it for you if you do this full time was a product that was a PCI card that would test the various bits of hardware, and report a 2-digit code that would tell what the problem was, and where.

    Unfortunately, it was a few years ago, and I couldn't afford it personally (it was like $500 US at the time?), so I don't know how well it really works - but the theory is sound. I think it was something along the lines of this product:

    http://www.ultra-x.co.uk/phdpci.htm
    --
    Worrying works!! 99% of all the stuff I worry about never happens :)
  138. MOM by whackco · · Score: 1

    I know this doesn't fit with your situation exactly, but I would like to take this opportunity to say that Microsoft Operations Manager is actually a VERY kewl product. I ran it up in a test environment in my house to test its abilities, and found it to be the most comprehensive event tracking, databasing, solving, and tag collector for large and small industry alike. So if you ever need these diagnositic abilities outside of small/individual PC work, then try MOM out.

  139. Quick tech pro by mt2mb4me · · Score: 1

    This is very nice software, we use it at work, runs off of a floppy which you can burn to iso, it will test every component piece by piece, it has found bad hard drives, ram, and video cards many times. Also from the same company you can get a POST card, great for when you can't tell what part of the motherboard failed. oh their url is http://www.uxd.com/qtpro.shtml

  140. lspci by dmaxwell · · Score: 1

    press ctrl-alt-F1 after booting to Knoppix and type lspci. It will give a list of everything sitting on the pci bus whether Knoppix configured it or not. /proc also has a wealth of information especially if you look at the files in /proc/bus. For instance:

    cat /proc/bus/usb/devices will spit out a handy list of everything on the pci bus.

    1. Re:lspci by SysKoll · · Score: 1

      Good point. Thanks for supplying this info. Onan, make a note of this.

      --

      --
      Mad science! Robots! Underwear! Cute girls! Full comic online! http://www.girlgeniusonline.com/

  141. Obvious, but helpful: Manufacturers' HDD Diags. by MrWood · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hey folks,

    It may seem too obvious to mention, but for ANY had drive issues, one of the first thigs I do is just use a bootable floppy with the manufacturer's diagnostic tools. Fujitsu, WD, Maxtor, they all have them and they have helped before. If the drive is failing, but still holding on, any bootable linux CD then goes in (Knoppix or Cool-Linux, ususally) and I copy the contents of the dying drive to a fresh one. Then the old one can continue its innevitable tranformation in to a paper weight.

    Mr_Wood

  142. Re:Not many PC maintenance people use any diagnost by Spoing · · Score: 2, Informative
    I agree, somewhat.

    If the diagnostic tool takes a few minutes to run, it generally is not as effective as my eyeball diagnostics of banging on the keyboard and testing out normal programs.

    If the diagnostic tool is focused on specific tasks -- say memory or hard drive -- and it performs an exhaustive test, it will catch things I can't.

    Case in point: I've found that 1/2 of my computers have had RAM defects; some right out of the box, and some toward the end of life.

    Sometimes, I suspect that a specific problem exists and the tool verifies it. Other times, I test just to make sure the systems are OK, and get a surprise.

    In either case, the tests should take hours. In one situation, I ran a burn-in test for over a day before any problems were detected.

    --
    A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
  143. IANAL but... by GrnArmadillo · · Score: 1

    There was a discussion on this topic over on the Games page a week or two ago RE: recurring charges for an X-Box Live subscription. The consensus seemed to be that Chargebacks should only be granted in cases where the merchandise wasn't delivered in the first place (amongst other criteria). Whether some over-worked/under-interested customer service person will give you one anyway (and whether the company then disputes your chargeback) is a separate question.

    I think that small claims court is probably the most likely to provide relief for this type of problem. I *believe* that you can sue mail-order companies in your jurisdiction and they'll lose by default if they don't show to contest - quite possibly not worth their time. What exactly the court usually does in a case like this where the company has carefully not kept any record of their promise of a refund (i.e. it's a strictly he said/they said) if it goes to trial, I'm not sure. :(

    1. Re:IANAL but... by CowboyBob500 · · Score: 1

      I used to work for an online sports-betting company, and we eventually had to restrict the use of credit cards for the bets (usually only allowed debit cards unless you became a regular player) because of the number of people who would request a charge-back if they lost a bet. The credit card companies would always grant the charge-back request...no questions asked... In my experience they seemed to require no proof whatsoever.

      Bob

  144. Re:Alternative medicine -- Network Problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IMO, network problems (thick, thin, 10T, and 100T ethernet, GigE, Hyperchannel, token ring, 802.11a/b/g, ...) are best diagnosed with the aid of a rubber chicken.

    YRSMV. (Your Ritual Sacrifices May Vary.)

  145. Prime95 and MBM by Psoleko · · Score: 1

    Prime95 is an invaluable tool for stressing the CPU and Memory of a system. I have found that a system may pass Memtest86, but will crash under Prime. Specifically the new version lets you stress the CPU, RAM, or a mix of both. Alongside that I also find Motherboard Monitor a great asset to any PC diagnostic kit. The ability to monitor temperatures and voltage levels is extrememly important. A weak +12v rail on a newer P4, Athlon XP system is indicative of system instability and most likely the cause of many problems. Also keep in mind heat is electronics worse enemy. I cannot tell you how many times I have found dust caked in the CPU heatsink and fan causing overheating, leading to system crashes or a dead Proc. Not the end all be all of diagnostic software, but a good start. I find the free alternatives better than any packaged software you can buy.

  146. A combo... by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

    Try TuffTest Pro (I think it can be found for $20 with a quick google) with the $20 plug set, and get a POST Probe from cwlinux.com, and codes from bioscentral.com. Voila, all you need for MUCH cheaper than MicroScope WITH their POST probe, and works better.

  147. Hardware Diagnostic Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey i recently had took look for just such a software. What I found is that no software company makes an all encompassing program to diagnose hardware. I think you may have to buy seperate software for different jobs. I have been trying out many different software companies and I had the most luck with Ontrack and R-Studio. Both are used for hardware diagnostics only though. So I think you may have to find a seperate piece of software to diagnose each piece of hardware, if you want it done correctly. Good Luck

  148. LNX-BBC or Knoppix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    using memtest and other nifty linux based utils on a bootable CDROM distributions like Knoppix and LNX-BBC has saved me many hours of torment and toil.

    Strongly suggested.

  149. Ask for the right part... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Up to 5 pounds it's a "hammer."
    Between 5 and 8 pounds it's a "maul."
    Anything bigger is a "sledge."

    Of course, this is the Information Age, and the young probably don't get exposed to the correct vocabulary for many physical objects. Perhaps not even to manual labor.

    sincerely,

    Old Coot

  150. Diagnostics are a waste of money by swb · · Score: 1

    Did PC diagnostics ever do anything worthwhile? I've been around PCs and Macs on a support/troubleshooting/technical basis for 15 years and I've never found a diagnostics program other than MEMTEST86 find a damn thing wrong with a PC or indicate if there was a problem. I'm excluding FDISK/fsck from this as corrupted disks are more of a database/software problem than a hardware problem.

    Nobody uses them because they don't do anything. Whining only slightly louder than the ventilation system will get you a motherboard swap from most vendors at the IT dept. level, at the consumer level you're stuck with at least one "vendor default image".

    It's too easy and cheap to swap out systems entirely, wipe your hands and walk away in 30 minutes than it is to BS around with diagnostics which might tell me that a nonreplacable surface mount component is bad.

    There are no good diagnostics because nobody cares about $75 motherboards and $100 CPUs.

  151. The human mind is a great tool. by xaoslaad · · Score: 1

    Seriously, most of the time you can diagnose a problem with simple methodical logical thinking. Somethings not working? What are the possible causes. Isolate and eliminate.

    Now you said diagnostic tools, so I wont tell you adaware/spybot, av, a knoppix disc and so on. Besides you have enough people listing enough good ideas.

    The simple truth is, if you replace the memory and the system starts booting, why do you need to know what's wrong with the memory? It's no working and you can not fix it. If you/the customer is lucky you can send it back on a warranty and get it replaced.

    Nope screw the diag software. The best thing you can do is buy and or acucmulate lots of spare parts like some people have suggested. Think it might be this? Replace it or put that in another system and (try to) prove it conclusively one way or another.

    I know in rare cases you get really F'ed up behaviour and just CANNOT figure out what it is even after replacing everything (two recent events in my experience come to mind...); but I seriously doubt any piece of software is going to tell me what was causing those problems. If they did it would be a first and I would definately recommend them...

  152. Is it me, or... by pruneau · · Score: 1
    Nobody mentionned the good ol' linux kernel compilation.

    If you get a signal 11, start diasgnosing at lower level !

    --
    [Pruneau /\o^O/\ warranty void if this .sig is removed]
  153. Re:AC totally misunderstood! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    #1 HIMEM and MEMTEST are not part of the POST. If either fail you've already isolated a symtom.

    #2 BIST should determine fatal flaws in the processor, much anything else is looking for corner conditions, that might prove very difficult to replicate. See also processor errata and validation. Processors a full of subtle flaws, they have departments working on finding them. I doubt a guy in his garage can slap together a solution that is close to a holy grail. Someone who sells Snake Oil will always find a mark.

    #3 Testing using synthentic tools, will likely completely miss anything but gross and fatal flaws. If they do pinpoint a flaw that's great. If applications are failing, and the memory /cpu/etc is the proven cause, why would you need more validation, you've either diagnosed the problem or you haven't? Creating a test case that accurately tests one specific failure mode, will like miss an infinite number of other subtle problems which are next to impossible to replicate or simulate, especially if you take them out of there operating environment. Far cheaper I suspect to throw away a bad memory stick, whether its a bad memory cell, or capacitive loading or reflection issue that's unique to your board. See also transmission line theory.

    The primary point is that a good technician can resolve a problem if the symptoms are present, without recourse to hand holding tools, which basically extend their billable hours and cost structure. I suspect most customers would be far happier paying for the 30 minute fix, than pay to have someone dick around for 4 hours.

  154. Is one tool at a time OK? by mrjb · · Score: 2, Informative

    Google for memtest86.

    --
    Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
  155. Diagnostic Software...try your brain! by mr.+mulder · · Score: 1

    In my experience, diagnostic software has never been better than my intuition and experience.

    Don't waste your money on software packages - spend the money you save on bettering your education and experience through training and reading. It'll pay you back, where as the software is liek throwing your money away.

  156. robust, reputable, and Free by rneches · · Score: 4, Informative
    Have you tried using the Linux Test Project? I administer a cluster of Linux machines, and use LTP as a pretty comprehensive test framework. Many of the tests are software related, but you can shut those off if they're not useful to you.

    I suggest you make a Knoppix CD with LTP installed. With a little configuration, that will take care of all of all your tests for the memory, disk, IO, and CPU. You might want to install America's Army or something to test the video subsystem.

    If you put a little effort into it, you'll have a test suite as good as, and likely better than, anything you could pay money for. If you want to buy something, you can make a donation to the LTP and Knoppix projects.

    There are also simpler tools, like Memtest86. I find this tool to be invaluable when I try to salvage old hardwar. I can't begin to tell you how much time it's saved me that I would have spent aimlessly swapping components around.

    --
    In spite of the suggestions and all the tests that I have made, I have not cavato a spider from the hole.
  157. AMIDIAG by Combuchan · · Score: 1

    If you can still find it, AMIDIAG (from American Megatrends) was my favorite from back in the day. It booted off a single floppy, and ran an intensive gamut of memory and other sorts of tests. It might be a bit dated by today's standards, but as far as the nitty gritty I think giving it a shot might indeed prove worthwhile.

    --
    "[T]he single essential element on which all discoveries will be dependent is human freedom." -- Barry Goldwater
  158. Duplication... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it cannot be duplicated by any means I could discover, even for backups. "Not that there's anything wrong with that!

    You should try dd under linux.

    Something like dd if=/dev/fd0 of=~/image (sorry I don't have the manual handy, but it's something like this)

    1. Re:Duplication... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From what I can tell it uses a combination of bad sectors and non-track data (outside of the standard 80 sectors). Though, true, I didn't try linux dd. Thanks for the tip.

  159. Re:AC totally misunderstood! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BIST? How 'come BIST has never found any of the L1/L2 flaws that I *know* are on some of the motherboards I've tossed? Turn off the cache, everything works.

    HIMEM? You mean that POS memory test that MS included as a part of DOS? You actually trust that thing?

    "Synthetic tools"? WTF?

    "Replace stuff until it works". LOL! You'd make a good automobile mechanic. I'd love to see you explain to a customer why you replaced the battery, battery cable, solenoid, ignition key, etc. because a headlight went out.

  160. Cerberus by dan_bethe · · Score: 2, Informative
    Go get Cerberus. It's the burnin and diagnostic suite for Linux (even if you don't intend to keep Linux). It's been a de facto for VA Linux and for the Linux kernel developers. Just install a complete development environment, including a compilable kernel in /usr/src/linux (make a symlink to linux-2.4), type './newburn', and walk away for about a week ideally. At least 8 hours. The longer the better.

    Just... listen...... to the screams......

  161. Take a different approach by codefungus · · Score: 2, Informative

    You are looking for 1 package to diagnose a giant set of hardware components. That seems like quite a challange. Maybe you should look at it from the standpoint of components such as a memory test, hard drive test, mainboard test, proc test, etc.
    This will obviously require you to lug someones hard-drive home to your "test" machine, but it may be easier looking for those kinds of software packages.

    Good luck

    --
    -- A cat is no trade for integrity!
  162. Easy and cheap. by acidrain69 · · Score: 1

    To test the video, just run soem 3D game demo. It's free, and it will flex the GPU muscles on the card. My girlfriend's fan died on her Geforce 256 and that is how I realized it was the video card locking up the whole computer. The fan was still working, but it was running at a low enough RPM that it wasn't clearing the heat out, so it would eventualy overheat enough.

    For testing USB, nothing beats a cheap little USB flash drive. Works in most OSes with no drivers, with the exception of win98.

    For Serial testing, just plug in an old serial modem. Doesn't matter what speed as long as it is tested good. I bought a 14.4 external at a thrift store for a few bucks. Works fine in a pinch.

    For parallel, who knows. There isn't much you can put in a parallel port that won't require drivers. A zip drive can be found for cheap.

    I dont' have one, but a POST card will check dead machines that don't come up.

    Always keep a spare ISA, PCI and AGP video card around. I bought a P2 motherboard for $7 once, and the AGP was fried. Everything else worked fine.

    Sound. Got headphones?

    You don't need expensive dongles and software packages to test all this stuff. Knoppix and with a boot floppy for older PC's is all you need.

    --
    -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
  163. swapping out as a diagnosis technique by geoswan · · Score: 3, Interesting
    swapping out can really suck as a diagnostic technique. More precisely, it can really suck if not done very thoroughly. Horror story follows.

    There was this little mom and pop computer shop, where I bought some stuff, and my buddy bought a whole computer, circa 1993-94. My buddy paid $800 for 16 megs of RAM. And he paid $250 for a honking big tower case, with wheels, and hinged panels, and almost a dozen external bays.

    That honking big case was a honking big mistake. He never populated those bays, and it was too bulky to carry on public transit. Well, I had a car, and he didn't. So, when he had hardware problems he would beg me for a lift.

    I can't remember how many trips we made to this store. A bunch of them concerned his flaky hard drives. The fellow replaced the drive, at least once.

    Well, one time my buddy asked me to take his computer to this store for him. And this time I watched the owner's diagnostic technique. The first thing he did was take the drive out of the big honking case, and put it in his test rig. He also confessed to me that he wasn't replacing the drives any more, he would just test it, and if it was okay he was telling my buddy he had replaced it.

    When I got the computer back to my buddy's place, I opened it up myself. I found that one of the pins on one of the power connectors had come loose. So it was only making intermittent connection. And this was causing intermittent problems.

    Diagnosis through swapping out components failed here.

    1. Re:swapping out as a diagnosis technique by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sounds more like they failed to swap components, not that the swapping of components failed.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  164. Sounds like AIDA is on its last legs by mccrew · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The future of AIDA does not sound all that bright. From their website:
    Due to the constantly decreasing interest about our 16-bit DOS system information tool AIDA16, as of February 16, 2004 we have decided to discontinue the product and to remove all AIDA16 related contents from our website aida32.hu. ... Please do NOT ask for source code of AIDA16, it is confidential and will not go public.
    and
    So as of February 16, 2004 we do NOT provide any official support for AIDA32. ... We preserve the right to ignore all messages about installation, configuration and application problems, however we will still be active on both the international and the Hungarian discussion forums.
    --
    Hey, Windows users, there is no such thing as "forward" slash, there is only slash and backslash.
    1. Re:Sounds like AIDA is on its last legs by dipipanone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Your interpretation is very different from mine. I read from this that they are no longer going to update AIDA16, but that they will continue to develop AIDA32, they just won't be providing free support for their free product -- other than on the discussion forums.

      That doesn't sound anything like being on it's last legs. It sounds like a sensible response for dealing with support for a free product.

    2. Re:Sounds like AIDA is on its last legs by sjwt · · Score: 1

      Oh dear..
      have to resort to Peer-2-Peer
      to get AIDA16..

      I hate it when i find out about a usefull
      product only to find it discontined..

      Jee, good thing Peer-2-Peer and newsgroups
      arnt beign outlawed.

      --
      You have 5 Moderator Points!
      Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
    3. Re:Sounds like AIDA is on its last legs by siddiqui · · Score: 1

      Any body got Aida16 would appreciate if somebody could mail me link or even better the file to intech@interlink.or.jp Thanks

  165. PC Doctor by marktech · · Score: 1

    If you want to try it IBM uses a limited version as it's diagnostic software. You can download the diags from IBM and run them on an IBM computer. The only difference I saw when I compared the IBM download to a normal PC Doctor was that the IBM version checked to see if it was an IBM computer.

  166. The SMOKE test by Slick_Snake · · Score: 2, Funny

    Turn it on and see if it SMOKES. If it does its a hardware problem.

  167. BCM Diags by Sheik+Yerbouti · · Score: 1

    BCM Diags is a Windows 95/98 diagnostics program that you can download for free (freeware). Of course who runs Windows 95/98? However once installed you will find a subdirectory in it's program directory called DOSdiags. Format a floppy with format a: /s and copy the contents on the DOSdiags subfolder onto the floppy and voila bootable DOS hardware diag disk for free. And it works as well or better than the ones that cost bucks. Check it out for yourself at the url below. I keep one around for basic hardware tests. I also got suckered into buying tufftest pro (which is at least affordable) but BCM diags works better in my expereince and it is gratis. Thank you very much to whomever wrote the thing and decided to give it away.

    http://www.5star-shareware.com/Utilities/Diagnos ti cs/bcm-diagnostics.html

  168. I hate to say it but by Alzheimers · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...Uniformity of hardware is key to maintaining a sane corporate IT infrastructure. If every department has their own standard, it's impossible to troubleshoot Gateways, IBMs, Dells, HPs, and frankenbeasts in an 8-hour day. x86 legacy aside, there are too many variations in quality and configuration even across "compatible" systems to reliably troubleshoot issues on a daily basis.

    I especially like Dell and IBM's basic troubleshooting kits. They seem to be pretty decent at working on a variety of their own machines, so one disk will support the Dimensions, Optiplexes, and Latitudes I see on a daily basis.

    For more in-depth toubleshooting, a good DOS boot disk with Partition Magic is a good first step. For Win2k machines, the System Rescue CD is vital. Especially when you need to bood from a CD (no floppy workstations), mount the NTFS partition, try to fix it, and if you fail you can mount a samba drive and backup your data all without multiple reboots.

  169. Re:MemTest86 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, read the post.

  170. System audit by jknopf · · Score: 1

    There's a great free service at belarc.com which is not diagnostic but it gives a complete listing of the PC's hardware and software in a handy and readable HTML format. It includes M$ hotfixes and updates as well as software licenses where applicable. Very useful if problems necessitate reconstruction of the system.

    John

  171. Best utility is detective work by phasm42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've worked as a technician for about five years, both on-site and in-house, and I really haven't found any good all-around utilities. Most of the diganostic programs mentioned here tend to test things that hardly ever test bad in reality, such as serial and parallel ports, timer chips, address lines, etc. The best thing to have around in case of a rather obvious failure (failure to power on, blank screen, beeping) is a collection of known good parts that can be swapped in to isolate the problem. They can also be useful in cases involving more subtle or intermittent problems, such as a CD burner that fails half the time or a computer that locks up after a few hours. Heat problems can be subtle -- I remember a friend telling me that the computer he shop didn't have heat for a while during the winter because of a bad relay, so there was a case where a computer with a slow fan worked at the shop, but didn't work when the customer took it back to their warm home. Sometimes a USB device a customer installed won't work because they plugged it in before installing drivers, and now it needs to be removed from the registry and installed again. In Windows, sometimes certain programs don't play well together, and experience will tell you what programs to avoid, and which processes in your task list don't belong. The point is, certain utilities may have their place, but no utility can replace the ability to diagnose a problem through experience and process of elimination. A memory test utility may show that you have bad memory, but experience may tell you that it's bad anyway, even when the program says it's okay. The good news is that I believe quality is improving again, after hitting a low in the K6-2 era, when cheap motherboard production proliferated, and the problem was compounded by the large increase in cooling needed for those chips (I'll never forget PC100 mainboards (yes, that was the company name, not the memory speed)). It's also pretty cheap nowadays to have spare parts on hand for quick checks.

    --
    "No one likes working in a hamster wheel, and your shop smells of cedar shavings from here." - TaleSpinner
  172. It's easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ok> setenv diag-switch true
    ok> reset

    Oh, you're talking about a Wintel box, not a SPARC;
    Well, you get what you pay for. :-(

  173. Hard Drive diagnostics. by mAineAc · · Score: 1

    Found this site with diagnostic tools for a bunch of different hard drive mnufacturers.

  174. Knowledge is power... by pUNX.h · · Score: 1

    When i was in high school i took a GOOD PC (A+)repair class... I learned what IRQ, DMA, Mpu and all that good stuff was really about... not just ok... place this card here... or make sure the IRQ is free.... Most importantly we learned about the OS...

    Computers are not like they used to be... your best bet is to know your OS... hardware is easy to replace... easy to trouble shoot...

    You really need to understand the OS... and then you will see that you don't need that expensive software... save your money... and take a good class...

  175. beware of Microscope by bl8n8r · · Score: 1

    Several years ago, I bought this package because it said it would detect bad ram. Well, it didn't. After contacting the company, they did not want to refund my money. I ended up calling the credit card company I was using and explained the situation. They told me to box it up, send it back, and they refunded my money.

    --
    boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
  176. Amen, brother. by oerlikon · · Score: 1

    Check the power supply first. Don't put your "known good" parts in a machine until you verify that the power supply is working correctly. Power supplies fail often, sometimes subtly. Applying 12VDC where 5VDC goes can kill your "known good" cards. Ask me how I know.

  177. Good Diagnostic util for Asus A7A266? by kevlar · · Score: 1

    Anyone know of a good diagnostic tool for an Asus A7A266? Asus' website blows and I have never been able to find _ANYTHING_ along the lines of a diagnostic utlitiy from them. :(

  178. SOLUTION by not_hylas(+) · · Score: 1

    My shop is Xserves and Macintoshes, so I've grown lazy and most nothing breaks (no flames please). I learned at school (where even the teacher-a master-couldn't control the beast which is MS Server) on Windows and if it weren't for these guys nothing would have got done. WARNING: these tools work and cost money. Pay the man. http://www.winternals.com/products/repairandrecove ry/index.asp http://www.sysinternals.com/

    --
    ~hylas
  179. Re:memtest86 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't agree more.

    If you have a gentoo install/livecd, an undocumented feature is to type memtest (or was it memtest86) at the boot: prompt and boom you're in.

    Alternatively you can stick it on a floppy.

    I have never found bad ram with it, though I know others who have.

  180. How to tshoot most PC's in 15 minutes or less by colenski · · Score: 4, Informative
    This will work 90% of the time:

    Prerequisites:

    (1) GHOST'ed hard drive with Windows 2000 installed, and the Sysprep utility enabled on it

    (4) Processors: a Socket 7, a Slot A, a Socket A, and a Socket 478

    (4*2) RAM modules: a couple of 72 pin SIMM's, a couple of PC-66 SDRAM's, a couple of PC-133's, and a couple of DDR's

    (3) Power supplies, an AT, an ATX, and one of those new ATX'es

    (2) Motherboards, 1 AT, 1 ATX

    (2) video cards, 1 PCI and 1 AGP

    Step 1:

    Replace user's HD with your SYSprep'd one. Boot. If you can boot, Win2K will do it's hardware detection routine. If it finishes, and boots to a 2K desktop, your problem is probably software and you have to narrow down from there. If it's using Windows, boot with user's hard drive in safe mode. If problem does not occur, disable taskbar lint under HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE/Software/Microsoft/Windows/Curr entVersion/Run and from user's Startup folder. Reboot. If the problem re-occurs, probably virus'd / spyware'd or corrupt Windows install. Re install Windows. Fixed. If it isn't fixed, follow step 2

    Step 2:

    If the user's machine did not go past the Win2K hardware detection routine, then the problem is hardware. Go into the PC's CMOS and reset to Setup Defaults. If that doesn't work, CMOS is OK, it's a hardware component. The list of problematic components in a typical PC, listed in desending order of probability is:
    • RAM
    • CPU
    • Power supply (yes, power supply)
    • Motherboard
    • Add on cards, including video


    Go into the CMOS, disable L2 cache on the motherboard (common problem and you don't have to swap out anything). Try Win2K detection routine. If it works, motherboard L2 cache is the problem. If it doesn't, swap the ram. If it works, it's RAM. If it doesn't, swap the processor. If it works, it's chip. If it doesn't, swap the PSU. If it works, it's PSU. If it doesn't, take out all add-on cards and swap the video cards. If it works, swap back each add-on card one by one until the problem re-occurs. When it re-occurs, the last card you swapped back in was the problem. Replace it, and you are good to go.

    Using this technique, I can troubleshoot 90% of PC's in 15 minutes or less, 90% of the time. HTH.
    1. Re:How to tshoot most PC's in 15 minutes or less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      disable L2 cache on the motherboard (common problem and you don't have to swap out anything). [...] If it works, motherboard L2 cache is the problem.

      L2 cache has been on-chip since the Pentium II on Intel chips and since the Slot A Athlon on AMD chips.
    2. Re:How to tshoot most PC's in 15 minutes or less by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1

      That, and a lack of Slot-1 and Socket 370 processors in his kit. Even if you dislike Intel, there are still a lot of Pentium IIs, Celerons, and Pentium IIIs out there.

      --
      Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
      The purpose of that site was not known.
    3. Re:How to tshoot most PC's in 15 minutes or less by toddestan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Interesting. First of all, why are CPU's so high on the list? I have found bad CPU's to be very rare, and the few that I have seen are the completely toast, computer will not even POST kind.

      Also, what's with the Windows 2000? It would probably take atleast 15 minutes for Windows 2000 to get done installing all the drivers and rebooting several times before you'd get to a desktop. And that's assuming Windows 2000 even has all the drivers for whatever hardware you are going to run accross.

      Here's what I do -
      General Windows flakyness/slowness:
      Run adaware/antivirus, disable all the crap in the taskbar. See if it gets better. Try safe mode.
      If not, reboot into Knoppix. If Knoppix detects and runs fine, it's probably a borked Windows install. But I'll try a few more steps before reinstalling Windows:
      Like, try the CMOS. Put it on failsafe mode. Flash the Bios if it's really outdated.
      If not that, open the computer and see what I got.
      First, dust it out, and see if it's overheating or the fan(s) aren't working. Make sure all the connectors are snug. Jiggle stuff around. Inspect the ribbon cables.
      If I have more than one stick of ram, try pulling all but one and swapping around. Try to yank out unnessecary expansion cards (usually all but video can go). Disconnect the CD drives, floppies, secondary hard drives.
      Disable onboard sound/lan/USB/anything that isn't needed.
      If not, get the parts bin. Try another stick of ram if I couldn't swap them out above. Try another power supply. Try another video card. Swap out the HDD ribbon cables.
      If that doesn't work, try another motherboard. Swap out various random parts from here.

    4. Re:How to tshoot most PC's in 15 minutes or less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He claimed 90% not 99.99999999%

    5. Re:How to tshoot most PC's in 15 minutes or less by colenski · · Score: 1

      Win2K's hdw detection routines are thourough, but also forgiving. If it doesn't have a driver, it will skip it and flag the hdw as unknown.

      When you SYSprep a win2k install, there's no reboot(s) involved. Ask the user for some info, detect hardware, and done. I find most modern PC's will get this done in less than 5 min.

      Oh, yeah I also meant "L2 cache" in general, not "L2 cache on motherboard" - my bad.

    6. Re:How to tshoot most PC's in 15 minutes or less by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but without including Slot-1 and Socket-370, it isn't 90%, it's more like 60%.

      --
      Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
      The purpose of that site was not known.
  181. Re:Biggest cause of failure in old PC: Bad contact by MieRoels · · Score: 1

    From the times of the Atari ST I still have the '10 cm test' in my repertoire.
    The Atari had lots of socketed chips inside, and whenever the PC acted a bit weird, I used to lift the thing 10 cm and just let it drop. That was ususally enough to settle the chips a bit better in their sockets and have it work some better afterwards.

  182. OT: Fighting Dell by red+floyd · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I know.... It's just dealing with people who can't go off script that's annoying.

    Thanks for the encouragement.

    -- red floyd

    --
    The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    1. Re:OT: Fighting Dell by FireBird615 · · Score: 1

      I _AM_ a Dell Phone Technician working in the US... I can safely say that it's only our "Partners" (*cough* overseas *cough*) that are using scripts. Had you talked to one of the techs in our call center, they would've replaced the NIC (or DMC would've replaced the MOBO). See one of my other comments about the Dell Diags...

    2. Re:OT: Fighting Dell by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      It was a nice Indian gentleman to whom I spoke.

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    3. Re:OT: Fighting Dell by FireBird615 · · Score: 1

      I figured as much.

      Our "Partners" overseas don't necessarily have actual computers infront of them - and thus no access to our diagnostic database, Knowledge Base, etc.

      I hear about it everyday and spend all my time cleaning up messes at work *sigh*

    4. Re:OT: Fighting Dell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've spoken to plenty of Dell Techs. in the good ol' US of A who would not budge from their flowchart (not necessarily a script). Yes it's plugged in. Yes it's on. Yes the monitor is cabled and on. Quit insulting me, and replace the damn part. And Omni sucks.

  183. My experience. by cwsulliv · · Score: 1

    When it comes to detailed hardware diagnostics:

    Third-party diagnostic software is usually insufficient because many hardware details are kept proprietary by the manufacturer.

    Manufacturers' diagnostic software is always suspect. When there is a somewhat obscure design bug, manufacturers have been known to remove a test which points out the bug. (Then they can point the finger at the user's software as the culprit rather than their hardware).

  184. Re:Biggest cause of failure in old PC: Bad contact by BobPaul · · Score: 1

    I wonder if that would help my laptop stop crashing... ;)

  185. Greatest diagnostics... by The+Spoonman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Right between your ears. Seriously, in the last 20+ years in this industry, there's one thing I've learned: if a diag detects a problem, you've got a problem, if it doesn't, you still might. Reason being, most hardware problems are intermittent. If the hardware doesn't work at all, then you know what the problem is and diags aren't going to tell you anything new (except for some arcane proprietary result code you need to tell the tech on the line when trying to get a replacement). If it's intermittent, it's tough to narrow it down, and diags might not catch it. If it's flaky, then the moment you run the diags is the time it doesn't act flaky.

    The best thing you can do is stop relying on useless diags. As you've learned, most are. Bone up on your troubleshooting skills, learn more about the hardware...

    Do you know BIOS beep codes by heart? Do you know what they are? I've met very few people over the last few years who do. You don't need a POST card if you learn 'em. :)

    Do you know how to write scripts? Batch files? A simple batch file that formats a drive, and fills it with data, over and over again will more often give you a good indicator as to its health than some diag.

    These things are all based on "the basics" that every tech should know. Buy a copy of "Upgrading and Repairing PCs" and memorize it. There's a TON of good information on how these boxen work. If you fill your head with skills, you can always be sure to have the diags and information you need. If you need to rely too heavily on tools and such, you might not be in the right field.

    --
    Which is more painful? Going to work or gouging your eye out with a spoon? Find out!
    http://www.workorspoon.com
    1. Re:Greatest diagnostics... by demon · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, as far as POST beep codes go, systems with an Award BIOS are pretty much useless. They basically have one "something's wrong" beep, which is one long beep. At least AMI and, afaik, Phoenix BIOSes still employ them.

      --

      Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
      Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
  186. QuickTech from UXD by ozzy_cow · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://www.uxd.com/qtpro.shtml

    Our company swears by it... every machine before it goes on the bench and after it leaves goes through fully automated and comprehensive "Burn-In" process. I'm not sure how much it costs, but its definitely up there around $400 maybe? and comes with bunch of loopback interfaces.

    it's pretty up to date too, last version we have has serial ATA, athlon 64 etc support

    I can't even count how much time we saved when after initial burn-in we realized that the memory was set to CAS 2.5 instead of 3 causing timer problems and subsequent weird application crashes.

    A tool like this is very important if you have many crap machines coming from the street and you dont know who worked on them before (Joe Sixpack thought that lower CAS will make his computer go faster, but his el cheapo memory modules just wont take it)

  187. GRRRR! This toipic hurts right now by smchris · · Score: 1


    I've just built a machine for my wife and it was hell. Could not get it stable.

    Testing from the start.

    Starting right down with a PS tester. All green, no regulator problems? Check.

    MB and RAM in. Six passes of the 3 256s with memtest-86 in a CD boot. Zero errors. (And on and on for other parts and swaps.)

    Called the motherboard tech support.

    THEM: Try it with only DIMM slot 0

    ME: But I got zero errors with six passes of memtest-86!

    THEM: Try it with only DIMM slot 0

    Tried it with only DIMM slot 0. Stable. Took that stick out. Put the other two in. Still stable.

    Moral? Like the guy who puts out memtest-86 writes: Buy RAM one speed grade above spec for Athlons and you will save yourself a lot of trouble. Quality is important from the start.

    Moral Two: Testing doesn't replace experience.

  188. AMIdiag from AMI by mikefocke · · Score: 1

    I build several hundred servers a year and use AMIdiag to burn them in and test them. I actually ship a legal copy of the product with every server I ship.

    As others have said, there are 2 versions, one runs under Windows. One under DOS. I use the floppy or CD loading version. It does a fairly comprehensive test of the hardware and devices.

  189. Re:Biggest cause of failure in old PC: Bad contact by Dravik · · Score: 1

    I have found Burn In Test to do a pretty good job of testing new components for hardware failure. It doesn't have a lot of diagnostics, but if your testing new hardware then all the need to know is a problem exists. After that your just an RMA away from a working component.

    --
    The purpose of language is communication, If the idea is clear the grammar ain't important
  190. Not enough money by $nyper · · Score: 1

    Sorry but it will cost more than 10s of billions to wire every house in the United Stated with fiber. That is just an unheard of and extremely expensive prospet.

    --
    "Help me Obi-/.-Kenobi,your my only hope!" -$
  191. Slackware LiveCD by ajs318 · · Score: 1

    This is more "lightweight" than Knoppix, and will run fine on less powerful hardware. Only thing is, the version I had is kind of allergic to some Intel P4 motherboards. You have about 60 seconds to type # rmmod i810-tco before it resets itself. Of course, some people would say that an Intel processor is a fault .....

    For testing RAM, a kernel compile is about the best you can do. Unfortunately, you might have trouble fitting the necessary stuff {full GCC inc. dependencies and kernel sources} on a CD. You could swap out the RAM into a board with a big HDD though .....

    You can check out serial and parallel ports with a voltmeter, a portable oscilloscope, or some homemade gadget with LEDs and resistors. In the dot-matrix days {when printers took ASCII codes} it was easy to tell which bits weren't working by seeing which characters printed wrongly.

    I have to agree with the other posters though, that there is no substitute for experience - and a set of known good parts you can swap. There really is no single tool that will do the job. If PC repairs were simple, they wouldn't need a human being to do them!

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  192. One thing sandra can't test is power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    One of the most commonly overlooked points of failure in modern PCs is the power supply. Many people underestimate how much power is needed by their monster P4 and two 160 gig hds and DVD burner, and countless fans. Power supply failure can cause numerous strange side effects, not limited to random freezing and random rebooting. It's one of the most insidious problems, because it's very hard to trace. It's also REALLY difficult to find good quality power supplies in range of a normal person's budget.

    A word of advice for do-it-yourself-ers: You get what you pay for. If you want a stable system, shell out the cash for a good quality power supply (Antec makes some nice upper-end quality power supplies in the range of a budget, check out tomshardware.com).

    1. Re:One thing sandra can't test is power by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      This so right. I know me to posts can be annoying, but this one deserves emphasis. I've had two machines give me issues due to power suply problems, (well one was made back when the bad caps were being used, but I saw no swelling or other indicator).
      Some really anoying flaky behaviour out of both winme (I know I know, but I play games too) and Mandrake, so I decided to check my setting in the bios to see if anything was off and saw that the +5v was running 4.3V and the +12 was jumping around from +10.8 to +12.4! Replaced it with a 430w from antec (was a 350w whitebox) and the numbers stay solid and so doese the system (well winme still had to be re-done every few months till I got xp a month ago).

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
  193. Re:memtest86 by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

    "The most common problems I encounter with PCs are memory related."

    Hah. The most common problems *I* encounter with PCs are user related.

    And if its a sysadmin user, its almost always a typo.

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  194. excellent (free) windows utility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    http://www.zhangduo.com/udi.html

    unknown device identifier, it will give you the PnP info on your hardware, so youll know what sound card is in there *without* having to pop the case.

    & its only 800k, so you can send it to someone & have them run it

    1. Re:excellent (free) windows utility by bearave · · Score: 1

      But be wary, this has a trojan in it that is released if you try to hack it. McAfee Virus scan will report the presence of the virus. Maybe you deserve it, if u are a hacker. But u probably don't deserve the alarm of a virus scan reporting if as nasty.

      --
      plurality should not be posited without necessity. - William of Occam
  195. Norton by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I have Norton Utilities, the only program on the cd worth using is WinDoc. I find that it fixes most Windows issues. Especially erronious registry entries. The program does seem to solve 80% of my Windows problems, the other 20% I am usually able to muddle through without help.

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  196. SDRAM Speed Ratings... by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    [memtest86] Let me send you my IProc PC-100 SDRAM DIMM... the idiots put the wrong timing values in it's SPD. I've only found one machine, ever, to work properly with that damn thing. Tyan MB's tend to lock as soon as the POST is complete. Memtest86 ran for 7 days and could not find a problem with the DIMM.

    Heheh... I've had similar problems with RAM speeds. A couple of years ago, a bunch of SiS shared video/system memory motherboards on FIDS (flight information display systems) that I was administering would cease to work when the displays were pushed to any resolution greater than 640x480.

    The symptoms were random garbage and slow refresh of the screen - ie, close a window and artifacts remain. Kick to a shell and they all disappear as the resolution is cut to 640x480.

    Took a look at the RAM itself. "PC100" stickers all over the place and 10ns speed ratings on the ICs. "Okay, f = 1/t and t=10ns, so this is 100 MHz rated RAM..."

    Tried swapping in another DIMM. Same problem. Tried swapping in another DIMM of another brand - no more problem.

    Did a little research when I noticed that the good DIMM had 7ns labels on all the ICs...

    Turned out that the PC100 specification requires all the RAM chips to have 7ns or better response speeds... and apparently, the DIMMs which didn't work came from some third-world country where the definition of a nanosecond is somewhat different than ours. (Almost like how a "watt" in computer speakers and car stereos has absolutely nothing to do with the scientific definition. Rule of thumb: amplifiers rated in real watts will tend to weigh 1/4lb per watt. Haven't yet found a similar rule for memory speeds.)

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    1. Re:SDRAM Speed Ratings... by Nintendork · · Score: 1
      I did a google search to confirm the required ns speed for PC100 defined by standards. There's nothing like that, but the speed rating does need to be fast enough to support the BUS speed for reliability reasons. Check out this page on The PC Guide. Thanks for the blurb on Watts. Very interesting!

      -Lucas

  197. Google is your friend. by EdlinUser · · Score: 1

    >>
    And last, but not least, a good Google search. Another thing that has saved my skin time and again is to input exact error messages and see what Google turns up.
    >>

    A friend's computer refused to boot and displayed: error 1506
    Google search: Your ps/2 mouse and ps/2 keyboard plugs are reversed.

  198. Excellent set off tools for any tech, by the80y · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I work as a the production mananger for a midsized PC manaufacturer who also does a fair amount of refurbishing of other manufacturers sytems (30k plus units shipped in 2003) We have a need to inexpesively test hundreds of parts and units on a regular basis. The following are tools I can have any of my tech without.

    The First is EBCD Emergency Boot CD

    http://www.ebcd.i-am.ru/
    Mirror of download http://www.simtel.net/product.php?id=61113&sekid=0 &SiteID=simtel.net

    This is a program that builds an ISO out of FD images and XML based build program so you can add all your floppy based boot tools to it or use the multitude of built in tools including Memtest HD fitness utility and AIDA 16

    Another excellent choice is to use Ultimate Boot Cd available at http://www.ultimatebootcd.com/ all make use of freeware and shareware.

    also as mentioned yesterday a WinPE disk made using Bart's PE builder is excellent for windows testing.

  199. while sleep 1; do make clean;make -j zImage; done by ajlitt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No, seriously, the best non-synthetic test of a system's datapath IMHO is to build the Linux kernel repeatedly. GCC is quite RAM and disk intensive, and so stresses the most flakiness-prone parts of a machine. Plus it gets the CPU pretty hot. This, in my experience, will make a machine with marginal memory, clock settings, or even heat dissipation fall over.

  200. No diagnostics program beats your brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Most of these programs are little help in diagnosing problems with a motherboard these days. I am an A+ professional with over 3 years experience and I have yet to extensively use or see another PC Tech rely on these expensive diagnostic programs with the exception of free, downloadable tools that test your hard drive or RAM. Check out Hitachi's Drive Fitness Test, a free download, works on most brands of IDE hard drives. (www.hitachi.com) For RAM, memtestX86 ver. 3.0 is good, as well as the Windows Memory Tester (note: does not run in Windows!), which is provided by Microsoft I believe.
    Beyond that, many hardware problems are simply not catchable by the programs you mentioned.
    If you are having problems posting a motherboard, a PCI POST error card can be handy, as it will tell you the codes that are being written to port 80h.
    Also, I'd say that most motherboard problems fall into the category of no POST or stability issues, both of which diagnostic programs will not help much. (Can't run software on a no-POST!!)
    As far as Windows based "doctor" prgrams that try to find problems in Windows, they are pretty much useless. Anything that screws with the registry is dangerous as well, could possibly render your programs or Windows inoperable!

  201. try this instead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LinuxDefender

    http://www.bitdefender.com/bd/site/presscenter.p hp ?menu_id=25&n_id=58

    ftp://ftp.bitdefender.com/pub/linux/free/LinuxDe fe nder/

    ftp://ftp.bitdefender.ro/pub/produse/release/lin ux /free/LinuxDefender/

  202. Hygiene is key by sharkey · · Score: 1
    running into a string of hairy hardware problems

    Maybe your clients need to shave? Or at least wear long pants and shirtsleeves.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  203. Save your money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Seriously... you dont realy need the software, all you need is some troubleshooting skills.

    The only software packages that i use when on site are ones such as partition magic, or R-studio (a verry good data recovery tool). If it looks like a hardware problem i just use the process of elimination, and can usualy find the cause in a few minutes. Invest your money in some known good hardware ( i.e. extra ram, video cards, hard disks, NIC's, and cables) and the process goes pretty fast. having the replacement hardware with you generaly impresses you clients as well becasue they get there issue resolved on your first trip out, and they tend not to mind if you charge a little extra for it.

    just my .02

  204. PC Diagnostics - computerrepair.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you tried ToolhouseUSA.com? Also look into computerrepair.com. They have forums that techs specifically discuss these issues.

  205. Re:feh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was moded as Insightful and is now Flamebait! cat /proc is going to tell you everything you need to know and more. Oh, wait, there is no proc on your win95

  206. Re:Microscope rules! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it stucks a bit that the microscope guys didn't really get a chance to defend themselves in this article.

  207. Just replace it by g0hare · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's why I don't support end-users anymore. $349 gets you a brand new Dell. Fixing PC's is becoming pointless. I haven't fixed anything except a dead hard drive in years. SO have them spend $349 and charge them $75 to add their old HD as a slave and reinstall their software and recustomize. You'll make more money with less work. I promise.

    --
    Vote Quimby!
    1. Re:Just replace it by Reteo+Varala · · Score: 1

      Some people don't want to replace a computer, because transferring the information from their old computer to their new one would be a daunting task.

      Don't forget, while computers are an end to themselves to us, to others, they're only a means to an end, and they don't want to have to risk losing what they've done so far.

  208. Ultimate Boot CD by platypus · · Score: 1

    Try Ultimate Boot CD.

    Really, a great tool, includes a _load_ of hardware testing tools (like vendor tools for harddisks, memtest, etc.).

  209. Free-standing Hardware Diagnostic Program by Tired+and+Emotional · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have had success with Checkit Utilities from Smith Micro. Note that I just use it when I have problems with my own machines so I cannot claim to be a power user and so cannot speak for how complete the testing suite is. They will boot from a floppy, which is essential for doing hardware diagnostics - you cannot do that from inside Windows.

    --
    Squirrel!
  210. Brute Force Troubleshooting by Pooua · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I have been in the PC service and repair field for over 15 years. I've worked with PC technicians for several companies in several states, in a wide variety of industries (some of the companies provide PC technical support to customers, but others were in-house).

    It is a shame that most PC technicians don't actually diagnose problems. Instead, they guess and swap, until the system happens to work, again. They don't really know what was wrong (though they probably will claim otherwise), and they certainly don't know if they fixed the problem.

    I've met several technicians who claim that modern microchips are less-sensitive to electrostatic discharge than obsolete microchips were, but the microchip industry says exactly the opposite. Most PC technicians take very little, if any, precaution against electrostatic discharge. They assume that if the component works, it isn't damaged, and they lack the skills and tools to find any real damage. Instead, they simply swap out parts if something stops working.

    I can't entirely fault the PC troubleshooting industry, though. Electronics are too cheap, most of the time, for technicians to spend very much time troubleshooting them. Speed is the most important asset in the PC industry. It is better to be fast than correct, whether troubleshooting systems or writing software code or technical manuals.

    That might be reasonable for PC technicians, but one could find the same attitude in other troubleshooting industries. I just took my car in for repairs, because I often had to push-start it. This after a week of repairs for various problems. In that week, the mechanics never found anything wrong with my car starting, and this last trip dedicated to that problem was no different... until the mechanics got ready to return my vehicle to me. When they tried to drive back to the parking lot, my vehicle would not start. A new starter appears to have taken care of that problem.

    Doctors are the same way. It costs far too much to find the real problem, I suppose, so doctors rely on rules-of-thumb and shotgun approaches. Many diagnosis are through the process of elimination; one treatment didn't work, so they try another. Doctors probably never know exactly what is wrong with the patient, but they often get close enough for the body to heal itself, to some degree.

    --
    Taking stuff apart since 1969 (TM)
    1. Re:Brute Force Troubleshooting by Nintendork · · Score: 1
      The geek in me agrees with you. It's nice to know exactly what went wrong with the defective device. What if the PSU was frying components and you were replacing the components without realizing that the PSU needs to be replaced? Fortunately, typical PC parts are inexpensive. Swapping out parts to make the problem go away is quite practical and efficient with computers, especially when experience helps you pinpoint the correct part to replace within one or two educated guesses. Luckily, most parts have warranties of at least a year (Three years on some of the more expensive parts) and if a part dies after that, a replacement could be cheaply obtained on ebay or through pricewatch since the part has gotten older by a generation or two. The only exception is OEM parts that come with a warranty of just a month or three, but that's the chance you take when you build using OEM parts to save a few bucks or buy a system from a vendor without obtaining a warranty through them.

      -Lucas

    2. Re:Brute Force Troubleshooting by Pooua · · Score: 2, Funny
      I could point out that I have worked in the logistics department of a PC troubleshooting company. It really annoyed me when the same technician on the same service call created a dozen orders, eventually re-building the entire device being "repaired."

      I know of at least one computer OEM that charges extra if the user makes multiple parts orders under warranty without going through the OEM's technical support help desk. Want to guess why they do that?

      --
      Taking stuff apart since 1969 (TM)
    3. Re:Brute Force Troubleshooting by Nintendork · · Score: 1
      Both of your comments come from experiences where the bad part wasn't found within the first guess or two. An experienced technician can figure out which part needs to be replaced with the first educated guess 95% of the time. He won't order a replacement part until he confirms that it's bad with a spare working part. The people that take a wild, idiotic guess as to what needs to be replaced and then proceed to file an RMA are not the people I'd like to refer to as talented computer technicians.

      -Lucas

    4. Re:Brute Force Troubleshooting by Pooua · · Score: 1
      Both of your comments come from experiences where the bad part wasn't found within the first guess or two.

      That's what I am saying, yes. I could even say the bad part (if such existed) was not found within the first 3 or 4 guesses.

      An experienced technician can figure out which part needs to be replaced with the first educated guess 95% of the time.

      The technicians at one of my employers each serviced a half-dozen calls a day. We had a few hundred technicians. I personally worked dozens of orders every week. At a 95% accuracy rate, that leaves a lot of bad calls every week!

      If you want to troubleshoot by rule-of-thumb, you could just restrict yourself to adjusting cables. More than half the time, home and small business user problems can be resolved simply by making sure that all electrical connections are securely seated (especially cables!). I can say from experience that loose cable connections are the main reason that certain fast food venders have down register systems.

      He won't order a replacement part until he confirms that it's bad with a spare working part.

      There is another problem. The technician has to service a wide variety of customers over an area of hundreds of square miles. We have a dozen types of printers, alone! How many spare parts do you think the technician can get in his vehicle?

      The people that take a wild, idiotic guess as to what needs to be replaced and then proceed to file an RMA are not the people I'd like to refer to as talented computer technicians.

      I can't argue with that, except to say that "talented computer technician" is a kluge, as long as the tech has to swap out parts to find a combination that works. Is it the tech's fault? Not always. But, we need a better way of finding and solving problems than brute force. We should have a more elegant solution.

      --
      Taking stuff apart since 1969 (TM)
  211. Floppies Still Needed by Pooua · · Score: 1
    I installed Windows XP Home on my first Serial ATA hard drive last month. In order to do that, I had to copy the SATA drivers onto the root of a floppy. The Windows installation (from the bootable Windows CD, BTW) did not give me the option of chosing the drive or directory from which to load the drivers. I had to have the SATA drivers in the root of a floppy disk.

    BTW, I also installed SuSE Linux 9 to the same SATA hard drive (again, from a bootable Linux CD). Linux 9 found the SATA drive without the need for externally-supplied drivers. V Communication's Partition Commander also did not need external drivers to find the SATA drive.

    --
    Taking stuff apart since 1969 (TM)
    1. Re:Floppies Still Needed by Xabraxas · · Score: 1

      I also installed Windows XP and Suse on a SATA drive last month. It was pretty lame that I had to dig out an old floppy drive just to install drivers and that wasn't even the worst problem. The real problem was that XP wouldn't boot off the CD with my GeForce 5700 Ultra. It would tell me it was booting then the screen would go blank. I had to install a different Graphcics card just to get it to work. Suse had a hard time getting the right configuration (I ended up having to edit XF86Config by hand) but at least I could boot into a console and fix it from there. Without that alternate graphics card I would have been screwed with XP.

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    2. Re:Floppies Still Needed by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 1

      This kind of installation process may be acceptable for the tech-savvy user but how is Aunt Tilly supposed to deal with this? The average user would never be able to install Windows with the current installer. Windows will never be successful in the marketplace until it gets an easy-to-use installer.

      No, hang on, that's not right is it?

  212. He Wasn't Modded by Pooua · · Score: 1
    How did he get modded up to a 2 and I am stuck at a 1.

    He wasn't modded. Some of us on Slashdot post at Karma: 2. I am one of those. I don't remember exactly how, but it had to do with the default settings ("Post at") level in my profile.

    --
    Taking stuff apart since 1969 (TM)
  213. Re:Not many PC maintenance people use any diagnost by Moofie · · Score: 1

    Yeah, anybody who uses tools to do their job is incompetent.

    I need to remember not to let you try to fix anything I own, ever.

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  214. Simmtester by Glug · · Score: 1

    www.simmtester.com has a program called Doc Memory that creates a bootable floppy disk with a memory testing utility on it that turned up a very intermittant bit error.

    I started having some very strange problems with a PC that gradually increased in frequency over several months. At its highest rate, I'd get some bizarre lockup maybe once every couple days. The big clue finally came when I copied a large file from one drive to another and the MD5 hashes didn't match (I thought I had a virus or a poltergeist or something at that point) and a file compare revealed a single bit difference. I tried several RAM testing utilities, and the simmtester one was the only one I found that could duplicate the bit error in one of my simms. I had to convince myself by moving the simm (256M PC133) to another machine and testing again, and sure enough, that was it.

    It was tough to make the bad bit misbehave: required zeroing the bad bit, then writing 1s into totally different but very specific locations elsewhere in the simm before the 0 would flip to 1.

    Six months of very intermittant single bit flipping in ram being used to cache disk reads or writes super-mega sucks the big one, by the way. I have this simm in a container with a biohazard symbol on it.

  215. I made a boo boo by dmaxwell · · Score: 1

    cat /proc/bus/usb/devices will spit out a handy list of everything on the pci bus.

    That command will actually spit out a handy list of everything on the USB bus. Ooops......

  216. ultimateboot cd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.ultimatebootcd.com

    all free, I make my feild techs bring it to ALL jobs

    enjoy

  217. Me too with Microscope/Micro 2000 by k12linux · · Score: 1
    I was told the exact same thing.. We don't have a demo, but if you buy you can return within 30 days, no questions asked.

    I would send them the software along with a letter requesting your money back. Send it certified so you have proof they got it. The last thing you want to do is let them stall you until the 30 days is up.

    If you have to take it to court, you can probably file in your local small claims and show proof that you returned it. Of course, it would be even nicer if you could use a different e-mail address and get them to send you an e-mail promissing the refund.

    -IANAL, but I play one on /. Take my advice at your own risk.

  218. Re:while sleep 1; do make clean;make -j zImage; do by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

    Nothing like two instances of gmake -j5 to give your memory and CPU a nice workout. :)

  219. Micro2000 by Eddiela · · Score: 1

    Wow, that is a name I have not heard in a long time. I unfortunately dealt with these rats about 13 years ago. When I dealt with them, their sales vermin acted just as bad as you described. I really thought that a company with practices this bad would have been long gone by now. Well, I guess like the saying goes, after a nuclear war all that will be left is cockroaches and the sales swine from Micro2000.

    1. Re:Micro2000 by computernerd90031 · · Score: 1

      I have their product and have been treated very professionally with no problems. As a matter of fact I had a bad diskette and they replaced it free of charge with no questions. Their sale rep was not even pushie which is what I liked.

  220. Microsoft On-Line Crash Analysis by liquidzero4 · · Score: 1

    MS Has a bunch of free tools. Here's a link to mem tester, other tools are also on line. http://oca.microsoft.com/en/windiag.asp

  221. What about... MSD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm surprised that no one mentioned this little gem. Well, okay - it's usefulness was somewhat limited... :^)

    http://www.computerhope.com/jargon/m/micrdiag.ht m

    Plus, I'm sure you can pickup MSDOS 5 or 6 floppies these days for pretty much free...

  222. Just run knoppix by twitter · · Score: 1
    Of course, sooner or later you *will* get the machine from hell with an intermediate fault that ends up locking windows for no damn good reason every so often.

    There's always a good reason and your job is to find it.

    If you run your #1 tool, Knoppix, and it does not experience those indeterminant faults, the fault is clearly software related. Just boot it and leave it running some silly task, like computing random numbers. When you get back, use uptime to see if the machine failed while you were gone.

    The only problem Knoppix has is the inability to recognize worthless hardware like winmodems. Ripping junk like that out fixes lots of problems, even in the windoze world.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Just run knoppix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Moderators: Please note that "twitter" is a known fanatical psycophant whose obnoxious offtopic rants are legend here on Slashdot. It doesn't matter what the topic is, he'll find a way to scrape in some pointless Microsoft bashing. While nobody expects us to love Microsoft in any way, his particularly tepid style of calling anyone he replies to "troll" or "liar" because he happens to disagree with whatever they're saying is well documented and should not be rewarded. If anything, twitter is the type of person that should not be part of the open source/free software community. He is an anathema to all that is good about free software.

      I'm posting this so that you (the moderator) have some context to consider twitter and not mod him up whenever he posts his filler preformatted rants about installing Knoppix or whatever that unfortunately get him karma every single time and allow him to continue posting his trademark toxic crap (read on) day in and day out. You may consider this a troll - I consider it community service. And I ain't kidding.

      If you're a /. subscriber, I invite you to look through some of his posting history. I guarantee that you'll be hard pressed to find someone that is more "out there" than twitter. You'll also probably notice he's got quite an AC following. Don't just read his posts, make sure you go through the replies.

      For example, in this recent post twitter not only calls the OP a troll but attempts to "tell it like it is" while making some vague argument about "GNU". Yes, if you're confused, you're not alone. The reply (modded +4) proceeds to simply destroy his bogus argument. You will notice he did not reply. This is what some people call "drive-by advocacy". A sort of I'll just leave you with my thoughts here and move on to the next flamebait kind of deal. In fact, he almost never replies because he knows that his fanatical arguments simply do not hold up to any sort of discussion. It's not that he's chosen the wrong cause - he's just going at it in a completely wrong way.

      More? Just read though this post and the subsequent replies. I guess this stands on its own.

      More? Bad spelling in astounding conspiracy theories, more offtopic FUD and uninformed "I'm right, look at me" rants, promptly proven wrong. Worse even, twitter wants to be RMS, apparently (that first one is a winner). I mean, really. You think?

      FUD, FUD, FUD, FUD, offtopic FUD, and more FUD. This guy is like the Monty Python SPAM skit, but with FUD and more FUD instead of canned meat. Amazed

  223. Re:Biggest cause of failure in old PC: Bad contact by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 1

    Google on "Apple III drop fix". This was an officially recommended procedure at one time.

    --
    Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  224. memtest86 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    check it out.

  225. 99% of the PC diagnostics... by Maljin+Jolt · · Score: 1

    ...can be made by booting Linux and looking at kernel messages. You can spare your bucks of course.

    This way, I already detected a memory chip failure which brought my friend's Windows to knees after 30 minutes of running.

    "If it can't boot linux, it's broken." is may favorite saying.

    --
    There you are, staring at me again.
  226. Future guessing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Most technicians do it by instinct and years of experience. "

    No need for years of, or some "guessmatic instinct"

    Rules of thumb

    Follow these and a lot of problems will fall by the wayside.

  227. Tools by cpuenvy · · Score: 1

    I have been in this business for years, and I have seen many tools come and go. Most of them go, or should. Honestly, they best tool is your brain. With experience comes the ability to quickly (99.9% of the time) diagnose and solve problems.

    For pesky Windows problems, I use WinDoctor on the Norton Utilities CD. You dont even have to install it, this app runs right from the cd, and it really does a good job. You can even delete a program directory and uninstall it with WinDoctor, although I do not recommend this on your customers machines!

    For partitioning, I use Ranish, which seems to be much quicker than fdisk.

    Hope this helps.

    --
    DISCLAIMER:

    I don't believe what I write, and neither should you.

    1. Re:Tools by Byteguy · · Score: 1

      I like your answer. I guess in the end, it's my experience that wins out over diagnostic software. I have never bought a POST card--too spendy and I can swap out a lot of parts for the cost of one of those puppies! After a while, you can pretty much tell what the problem might be. When I mentioned QuickTech, I think I talked about using it for burn-in. That is where it does good. It can point you toward problems with memory, etc, too.

      --
      "Those who dream by day are cognizant of many things that escape those who dream only at night." ...Ed
  228. SpinRite and Memtest-Uphill both ways... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " Learn how the hardware works, and it's easier than you think."

    In the age of schematics and hardware-level documentation, this was possible. No longer except in the most high-level way. This is true not only of computers but other hardware as well i.e. cars, etc.

  229. Re:Low Cost - OBLIGATORY mention of Gentoo by garbagedisposal · · Score: 1

    "And the Gentoo LiveCDs all ..."

    Gentoo zealots seem to have enrolled in a worldwide campaign to hype this distro in every possible forum on the planet.

    Any body who has one through the pain of a Gentoo install / compile will know how bogus the claims of SPEED!! really are.

  230. QuickTech, OnTrack ESR and SpinRite-trends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slight brainstorm.

    Is there a diagnostic Linux kernel that detects "trends" that are a precursor to failure?

  231. logic and messiahs by MegaFur · · Score: 1

    Isn't it likely that Maxtor's very own drive testing tool would bypass or disable that particular feature (auto sector relocation) during drive testing? Wouldn't it be a really stupid test if it couldn't?

    The original poster has already posted in reply to your post confirming my theory.

    Oh, and, messianically speaking, Steve Gibson ain't all he's cracked up to be.
    Don't get me wrong--his programs are cool, and he's a smart guy--I'm just sayin' his I've-gotta-save-the-world-by-telling-them-they're- doomed! attitude is a little over the top.

    --
    Furry cows moo and decompress.
    1. Re:logic and messiahs by sshore · · Score: 1

      Why would Maxtor's drive testing tool disable auto sector relocation? The test is to ensure that the drive is useable, not to ensure that there are no bad sectors on the underlying media. In fact, the underlying media usually has bad sectors from the factory.

      The original poster says that the Maxtor tester disables the feature when testing. It's possible that he's right, but it isn't the norm. More than once, I've had a drive with bad sectors that was miraculously "cured" by zeroing it out (dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda), to the satisfaction of the manufacturer's diagnostic test. (To my chagrin, on the one drive, the bad sectors came back with reinforcements months later. I guess there's only so many spare sectors to map.)

      I'll agree that Steve Gibson is a nut. SpinRite has some good ideas in it, though, but it hasn't been updated in years and is more useful for older drives. It was a good piece of software in its time, and it's probably the reason that he gets as much attention as he does today.

  232. Biggest cause of failure in old women Bad contacts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The biggest cause of failure in an old PC: Bad contacts. Just move every card and connector 2 millimeters out and in again. The rubbing of metal to metal creates fresh contact surfaces. Renewing the contacts should be the first step in fixing any PC. "

    The biggest cause of failure in an old marriage: Bad contacts. Just move your "connector" 2 millimeters out and in again. The rubbing of flesh to flesh creates "happy" contact surfaces. Renewing the "contacts" should be the first step to fixing any old marriage.

  233. Re:If you paid Micro 2000 by credit card, and onli by computernerd90031 · · Score: 1

    You are just a real common fucken criminal. A big fucken thief aren't you!!!! It is people like you that make these companies the way they are. No wonder all the prices are high on their tools!!!! Fucker!!!!

  234. cpuburn by antdude · · Score: 1

    I am surprised no one mentioned this one, cpuburn. It is a good CPU stress tester in Windows and Linux. Be sure to reading the warning because it can damage if your system doesn't have proper cooling.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  235. Another OSS CDR -- FIRE by rwa2 · · Score: 1

    Try FIRE. I've only used it once, but it seems to have a lot of interesting stuff (though it has a bit of a different, more security oriented focus). A look at the "Tools Available" list is educational all by itself.

  236. Your world is too small then by kentsin · · Score: 0

    Can you count how many parts of the machine not being tested by your method?

  237. Re:while sleep 1; do make clean;make -j zImage; do by Night+Goat · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but it doesn't do any diagnosis, which is what the poster was wondering about. Sure, we can all break computers, but the OP wanted to fix them!

  238. Diagnostic Software for PC's by Byteguy · · Score: 1

    I, too, have tried a bunch. The latest one I have uses is QuickTech Pro from Ultra-X. Seems to work reasonably well for burning in systems, but it can be spendy to keep up to date. You can test individual components or run a batch running a "burn-in." It's time to renew it, but I don't know if I want to put out the bucks. I'd rate it reasonably good, but as in other programs, the explanation of the error messages leaves something to be desired.

    --
    "Those who dream by day are cognizant of many things that escape those who dream only at night." ...Ed
  239. Are they still necessary? by Forge · · Score: 1

    IAAEITA (I Am An Expert In This Area) -- Credentials available on request.

    Modern desktop systems have so few physical components that you can solve problems by
    swapping out parts in less time than any diagnostic software will take.

    With experience you can pick up the more obvious hardware problems without doing that.

    On Servers with lots of complex subsystems the diagnostic software is shipped with the system
    or available for download. I.e. On a Dell PowerEdge 2650 You need to run the 32 bit diags to
    discover which fan is misbehaving if one is performing below spec.

    PS: Don't buy complex server hardware without accompanying diagnostics, online and phone
    support accompanied by a solid and reliable warranty.

    --
    --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
    1. Re:Are they still necessary? by thetaikung · · Score: 1

      Bingo! As a member of the IT support staff for a research division of a major university, I completely agree.

      --
      P226 .40cal
  240. "Swap and See" invalidates your Windows XP license by jeko · · Score: 1
    Just had a box in the office go down. Turns out the power supply went and took the motherboard with it. A couple months before I'd added a wifi card to the box because the boss didn't like the way the network cable looked.

    Boom. Windows product activation came up. I had to get on the phone and fight for a new license number.

    Anyone else worry about what Windows product activation will do to the "swap it and see" technician?

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
  241. POST debugger by jockeys · · Score: 1

    While I have yet to find *any* device that can test everything, this spiffy little gizmo from Elston Systems has saved my bacon once or twice when I thought I had a dead motherboard. It doesn't catch all the stuff all the time, but I've found it to be pretty useful. Plus, *grins* as a geek it's fun to leave it in my case and have the hex display shining mysterious stuff through my window.

    --

    In Soviet Russia jokes are formulaic and decidedly non-humorous.
  242. Google, and a brain. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously.

    A real techinician doesn't need generic "diagnostic software".

    Leave Norton Utilities for the USERS (idiots)

  243. PS / RAM by Mindcry · · Score: 1

    this is a me too on the power supply causing MANY headaches, and a lot of techs tend to miss it cause its not really expected (as long as the machine boots)...

    and ram tends to suck in general, lots and lots of bad sticks... i've had the best luck with kingston and crucial as far as fail rates...

    these are definately the two most common hardwire problems i've run into, with the 3rd being hard drive problems (magnets, people dropping them etc).

  244. QuickTech Pro Rocks by robertjw · · Score: 1

    I purchased Quick Tech Pro from Ultra-X two years ago after a situation where memtest86 wasn't adequate to diagnose a memory problem.

    memtest86 is a great utility, but Quick Tech Pro's has a better interface, more tests and more comprehensive test. I'm a complete Open Source supporter, but this is one instance where a $300 commercial product is worth investing in.

  245. Re:Coast to Coast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    criminals , had the cheapest price on some ram on pricewatch but will not sell you the memory they list. Just trying to get you to call to charge you more. criminal bastards!

  246. I'll weigh in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Electronics tech 30 years. PC tech for the last 15 or so. There is no software worth the effort anymore and that's presuming there ever was at anytime past. I used to use Checkit from Touchstone for burn-in mostly but that has fallen by the wayside as well. Nothing is more time and money efficient than subbing in known good parts. Even at that though, you quickly run up against the cost/time/value problem. If you spend two hours troubleshooting down to a mainboard, once replaced and all hours accounted for, the bill will be near the cost of a new box. On the other hand the cost of a new box once all data, programs and the general setup is transferred over is not exactly the advertised price either so there is still value to be had in the doing, but the edge has become quite a bit finer and the age of a system plays into the equation substantially (and earlier than most people expect).

    There have been times when I wished for a good memory tester but those aren't cheap, not as cheap as keeping a supply of known good memory around which fills the same purpose for less money and at the end of the life cycle you can push the used memory out the door.

    A POST card. Would like to have one of those too but would be helpful infrequently and really only good for telling the customer what the problem is with greater precision. Instead of a general fault on the mainboard you might be able to say the problem is in the interrupt controller. Mainboard shot either way but you have additional assurance on your diagnosis.

    On the upside most problems I see are software related and not hardware. On the hardware side most of those can be diagnosed accurately within minutes with simple tests, visual inspection, substitution and smell. You can smell burnt. Follow your nose. Like you can see a swollen capacitor, hear a bad fan and feel an overtemp processor or other hot component.

    To make money you cannot piss around and that cannot be overstated.Luckily the number of hardware problems that will eat your lunch are comparatively few and can be written off for the exercise in futility that they are.

    Of greater concern however, is the coming issue of premature component failure due to an inferior materials change in the manufacture of some semiconductors which could far outshadow the bad capacitor problem recently endured. A rash of these problems on mainboards could be troublesome at the repair center/shop for the amount of diag time involved and the inability to absorb the loss of productivity economically. If you fix computers for a living this is a bottom line.

    To wrap this up, I have not found any good software for explicitly detecting hardware problems accurately. There is no magic bullet. As mentioned in previous posts, there is software that is very helpful. I keep a copy of Knoppix around for example of repurposing software into a diagnostic aid. I once uncovered a timing problem in a North bridge using PKZip on a large file that would fail on verify in discovery of the root cause of intermittent blue screens being hardware. Sometimes you just have to know what your looking at.

  247. once upon a time by FreakWent · · Score: 1

    debug
    > g=c800:5

    anyone else remember that?

    1. Re:once upon a time by erc · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'll give away my age, too.. ;)

      --
      -- Ed Carp, N7EKG erc@pobox.com PGP KeyID: 0x0BD32C9B What I'm up to: http://intuitives.mine.nu
  248. F.Y.I. -- SpinRite 6.0 with NTFS support... by Fish+(David+B.+Trout · · Score: 1

    ...is already on it's way (and has been for several months now[1]).

    Look for it in the [VERY] near future.

    --
    "Fish" (David B. Trout)

    [1] Ref: news.grc.com, group: grc.spinrite.dev.

    --
    "Fish" (David B. Trout)
    Fight Spam! Join CAUCE!
    http://www.c
  249. No test is perfect. by quinkin · · Score: 1
    Ok so what the original poster wants is software that you can run on faulty hardware and ALWAYS diagnose the fault correctly.

    Sounds like using the internet to download the modem drivers you need to connect to the internet...

    Memtest will indeed fail to detect some failures on some memory chips as it requires a high degree of knowledge regarding the bit/cell alignments within the silicon. ie. write to a bit, write to a adjacent(sic) bits and then check the original bit has not been corrupted by the adjacent writes. To do this memtest has to guess (or try a range of algorithms?) that will hopefully find MOST flaws.

    Q.

    --
    Insert Signature Here
  250. "intermittent" fault, but yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >with an intermediate fault
    http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book= Diction ary&va=intermittent&x=0&y=0

  251. Three words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Capitalization.
    2. Punctuation.
    3. Grammar.

  252. Micro 2000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out Micro 2000:
    http://www.micro2000.com/

  253. POST by korinthian · · Score: 1

    Where did you get your POST code card? I haven't been able to find an inexpensive one

    1. Re:POST by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      Well this is the slightly embarrising part, I got it at CompUsa. still it was under $50 (can't remember if it was 49.99 or 29.99, one of the two prices) but it shows port80 on two 8 seg led's and has about a 16" cable to another display so you don't have to stare into the case at an awkward angle.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
  254. Micro 2000 Official Reply To Article by Micro2000 · · Score: 1

    This is in response to Reborn Data. Although MicroScope has probably the highest customer satisfaction rate in the industry among professional technicians, we admit that it's not possible to please everyone. However, in this case we believe something else is going on.

    By his own admission 'Reborn' was getting free demos of every diagnostic he could, and when we didn't offer one he bought the package anyway with the apparent intention of returning it when his evaluation was over. In doing so he chose to ignore both our license agreement printed on the software envelope and the seal he had to break to open the package. Unfortunately no reputable diagnostic provider can give an unconditional 30-day trial of the type he claims he was offered, because too many dishonest people will order the product just to fix their problem of the day and then ask for a refund. We do however bend over backwards to solve any technical problems a customer may encounter, and in the rare case where that fails we will usually give a refund anyway. In fact, Reborn's first contact with our technical support staff only two weeks ago was to request a refund, and only when that was denied did he come up with some technical issues with which to justify his request. Most of these are resolvable with a little guidance, but for two instances where Micro-Scope may have fallen short, our engineering department has created a patch. We have been unable to contact Reborn for the last several days, but the patch is in the mail to him and is also being posted on our website in case anyone else encounters these same problems.

  255. Re:Low Cost - OBLIGATORY mention of Gentoo by Oo.et.oO · · Score: 1

    i wish i could mod your ignorance spewing post down.

    the install is not the most friendly in the world, nor speedy. but the performance increase i see when i do it right is very real.

    and that's not all that is good about gentoo.
    use whatever distro you want and keep your ignorance away from mine. more for me. ;-p

  256. Re:Low Cost - OBLIGATORY mention of Gentoo by garbagedisposal · · Score: 0

    I have not had that experience.

    The Install is non existant - unless you count Linux From Scratch as an 'install'.

    The endless compiling is tiresome.

    The package management is just another package manager & is buggy anyway.

    The claimed speed increase is something like when you sit & hit your thumb with a hammer for hours & then stop...it feels good.

    Gentoo is only one of many Source Based Distro's, it's not unique and it does not live up to the hype.

  257. The 3 R's by SigmoidCurve · · Score: 1

    Reformat, reinstall, and if that fails...replace!

    It's just too hard to find software that can diagnose hardware - given the variety of the sources to hardware faults and the many many interaction effects of different chipsets, cpus, RAM modules, power supplies, etc. Not to mention the os.

    --
    Dictionaries are for loosers.
  258. re software by Pisnaz · · Score: 1

    Personally I'd look at these sites Barts PE CD and 911CD They asist you in creating a recovery/util cd for win based systems, dos based utils and even small linux distro (Tomsrtbt). For just finding a good prog for testing hardware sisoft and aida are nice but search tucows nonags etc and you will find freeware progs that have tons of functionality and are not as bloated/intrusive as large name companies software (i.e Norton). Pisnaz

  259. AMIDiag hardware diagnostic by chrisgh3 · · Score: 1

    I work for a computer motherboard manufacturer and have been using AMIDiag 6.20(http://amidiag.com/) for about 6 years now. The software does a good job in finding hardware problems. Draw backs to the software is that it runs in DOS mode (FAT16 or FAT32). It requires about 2M of harddrive space. The DOS version comes with the Suite 2.0 Windows version CD. The Windows version is poor. I have found countless number of errors with the DOS version. Even the memory test proved to be better than a dedicated memory module test equipment. Obviously this will not fix any Windows operating system compatability problems. The only error from AMIDiag that seems to be not correct is an occasional NVRAM failure run in batch mode. For NTFS systems, it would not be too hard to set this software up to run from a CDROM. Just can't log.