Slashdot Mirror


Spyware Becoming Worst Tech Support Problem

teknurd writes "Wired has an article about the growing problem of computer users having to call tech support to get help removing all of the spyware on their computers. 'The fast-growing phenomenon is already responsible for more than 12 percent of all technical support calls in Dell's consumer hardware division, the biggest category of complaints this year, company representatives said.' Personally, I have had to remove this plague from the computers of several friends and family members."

814 comments

  1. Just run Spybot by baggachipz · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.spybot.info . That's all it takes. Have it run on people's windows startup and they're set.

    1. Re:Just run Spybot by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Insightful

      http://www.spybot.info . That's all it takes.

      When you're Joe Blow at home, that's fine. But when you administer dozens, hundreds, thousands of Win boxes and you can't automate installing/configuring/running Spybot, things are a bit different.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:Just run Spybot by sulli · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Just run Mozilla, and none of that stoopid-ass ActiveX will try to hijack your PC.

      (Come on, didn't people see this coming when Microsoft came up with ActiveX back in the day?)

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
    3. Re:Just run Spybot by hattig · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That, and AdAware.

      So that they catch what the other one missed.

      If I was an OEM, I'd get a license from one of the companies to include AdAware/Spybot on the shipped systems and set it to run once a week. That's gotta be worth it to remove 12% of support calls!

    4. Re:Just run Spybot by radixvir · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I used to think that only computer novices got spyware. But just this past week i got several all at one time. i have no idea how it happened ( i dont even use internet explorer) but it was bad. after i run ad-aware and mcaffee to clean them off, one of them deleted some important files under my system folder, or at least thats what i assume because my tcp/ip wouldnt start. i ended up having to totally reinstall windows. ive since decided im going to try and use windows as little as possible, only when i need to work in photoshop or office (i have the newest versions, ie no crossover office). but beware even advanced windows users can still get these things.

    5. Re:Just run Spybot by cscx · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'm going to make the assumption that XPI can be abused in the same way -- but why abuse 5% of the browser population (and the 14 users of Netscape Navigator) when you can abuse 95% of your browsing audience?

    6. Re:Just run Spybot by AndroidonPPC · · Score: 5, Informative

      \\(machine name)\c$\documents and settings\all users\startmenu\programs\startup\ is good place to start

      or just make a registry file to add info into hkey_local_machine\software\microsoft\windows\curr ent version\run key. (hint: this works on any windoze box when done as administrator)

      with remote administration and a script, you could have those puppys running mighty quick.

      -Andy in Chi

    7. Re:Just run Spybot by richy+freeway · · Score: 1, Funny

      Clearly they did. ;)

    8. Re:Just run Spybot by Gunja · · Score: 2, Insightful

      thanks capt obvious not like the people that read ./ dont know how to clear spyware off their machines. The point is my company is paying me money to clean off advertisements from our computers. Its a waste of time, resources and money. And just like virus software ad/spyware removers and blockers 1) dont always work 2) have to be constantly updated.

    9. Re:Just run Spybot by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Informative
      Lavasoft Ad-Aware still detects things that spybot doesn't - and vice versa. Entirely (?) removing CoolWWWSearch actually required running both programs.

      There's nothing you can do to prevent spyware aside from completely locking down systems so users have nearly no permissions to the registry or anything else. This of course means that no programs not explicitly allowed on your network will operate. If you can deal with this tradeoff, more power to you.

      Spybot Search & Destroy is a fabulous piece of software but it doesn't do the whole job.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Just run Spybot by garcia · · Score: 1

      It takes both SpyBot and AdAware... SpyBot gets things that AdAware misses and vice versa (for example I ran it yesterday (along with AVG) and cleared out a bunch of stuff that had accumulated over a three day time period and SpyBot missed 11 things that AdAware picked up).

      They are free and "free", respectively, why not use them both?

    11. Re:Just run Spybot by bwalling · · Score: 1

      http://www.spybot.info . That's all it takes. Have it run on people's windows startup and they're set.

      Never used it. Never had a problem. I don't use Internet Explorer, and I don't use Outlook/Outlook Express.

      I know this looks like the standard bash MS response. It's not. FireFox is a great browser and really is good enough to replace IE. You won't get all the junk spyware crap running FireFox. Samething goes for Thunderbird. Get your family and friends running it and they'll stop calling you about spyware.

    12. Re:Just run Spybot by chosen_my_foot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You forget that the user can still download and install WeatherBug, Precision Date Time Manager, and many other helpful products. Using an alternative browser does not prevent this action.

      For some reason a lot of people seem to believe that using Mozilla/Firefox/Opera makes their box invincible. It's a good start, but should only be one layer of your security.

    13. Re:Just run Spybot by michelg · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I can attest to the fact that some sites that are using those horrible ActiveX install popups are now also including XPI popups as well, at least for firefox in win32.

    14. Re:Just run Spybot by rixstep · · Score: 1

      ... which only works until the next calamity hits.

      Instead, try this...

      Or this...

      And then you can turn off that snooze control.

    15. Re:Just run Spybot by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Different in that you won't be calling tech support?

      I agree.

      Incidentally, i don't see why you can't automate installing spybot for a thousand boxes. I did it for fifteen, and I'm not even in IT.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    16. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you're an educated user, shoring up your home network is extremely simple:

      1) Install a hardware firewall.
      2) Install a software firewall.
      3) Install a quality antivirus program.
      4) Install Ad-Aware - preferably the Pro version with Ad-Watch.
      5) Install Spybot.

      The problem is that if you have family or friends that don't know anything about computers and don't seem to care to learn, doing the above will help you out temporarily... and then cause you a huge amount of problems on Windows.

      For example, every time the software firewall asks them to approve a connection, they'll either always deny them (screwing up their software) or approve them (screwing up their security). They'll be upset when they can't use a program because it needs ports opened on the firewall. If you show them how to open ports up, they'll eventually just open ALL ports, thinking "now I won't have to worry about doing it every time a new program wants new ports available". The other option is not to tell them how to do this and just do it for them. You are now their bitch.

      The other problem is that they'll want to install applications. In Windows, you can set several user levels. You can set a very restricted one that doesn't let users install software or access/modify any documents but their own. Then there's a level that will let them install software and use all documents. Then there's the full power user, backup user and admin user levels.

      For security purposes, you would of course want to set their account to a level that will not allow them to install software. Otherwise they're going to be installing every stupid spyware riddled, adware plagued, malicious, wasteful, resource-eating piece of shit they come across. So, now every time they want to install a program, they're going to come to you. You're their bitch.

      So the only way to achieve true security is to prevent them from doing anything they really want to do and now you're going to be bothered by every person that you've set up every time one of them wants to install a program or open up some ports. Every time they want to install a game, application, office software, utility, etc.

      It's a hassle just dealing with this for one person. Now imagine if your grandmother, an uncle, your mom, two siblings, a neighbor, a girlfriend and two family friends all have you on the hook like this? It never ends. And then people wonder why techies are becoming more and more reluctant to help and more abrasive. Look, it's like being a car mechanic. As a car mechanic, I would not expect my friends to repair their own engine block or diagnose and fix other complex problems - but I certainly expect them to fill their own gas tank, change their own oil, refill their wiper fluid, check and refill their power steering, check and fill their tires, replace signal lights, screw on their license plates, adjust their rear-view mirors and side mirrors and adjust their seats into position.

      However, for people who aren't willing (or maybe can't in the case of some elderly people who just can't fathom the concepts) to learn the basics, you'll find that if you don't help them they will end up with myriad of crap on their machines. Dozens of viruses, spyware, programs running in the background to steal resources and processing time, adware programs that pop-up crap all the time, hijacked browsers, three p2p networks starting at launch time and running in the background (eating up memory, cpu, storage, bandwidth), p2p utilities that go with them, "weatherbug" software, msn, yahoo, aim and others, and countless other things. I've seen people with so much fucking shit on their machines like the above mentioned that their machines would start-up and then die, crash or reboot before finishing displaying the desktop. Just too much crap running.

      It isn't my job to baby people, teach them every little thing and care for them. They can buy books, play around and learn on their own just like the rest of us had to. If you can't appr

    17. Re:Just run Spybot by sulli · · Score: 1

      Well, that's true - not being stupid is also a prerequisite. (You'd think that people would pay attention to what is in the crap they download. But this is asking a lot.)

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
    18. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think not running IE and OE is saving you from spyware I think you'd be in for a shock if you ever ran Spybot...

    19. Re:Just run Spybot by dnoyeb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Are we computer specialist really any better than the Anti-Virus camp? We make money on both sides of this equation. Were becoming like lawyers.

    20. Re:Just run Spybot by swordboy · · Score: 1

      Is there a solution that will update itself and run automatically? I've been using Ad Aware and it works fine if people would bother to run the update and scan. It can't be configured to do this so most people call me up and then I have to walk them through the clicking.

      If people knew how to click on a few things (or not click, as the case would be), this wouldn't be a problem. We need something that will update and run itself when the screensaver comes on. It should NOT prompt the user for a damn thing. Perhaps we could even have a spyware-like installation so that users don't even know that they've got it.

      It is only a matter of time before someone starts harvesting keystrokes with spyware (some of it already does, just no maliciously) for bank accounts and other important stuff.

      --

      Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    21. Re:Just run Spybot by kerrbear · · Score: 1

      http://www.spybot.info . That's all it takes. Have it run on people's windows startup and they're set.

      Well I got Spybot and ran it on a friend's XP machine that was really messed up (ads popping up during idle time, ran slow, etc.). I ran it on his wife's account and it found a bunch of stuff, which I eliminated. Then I ran it on his account, and it found a bunch more stuff- what the heck? Do you have to run it on every account!? Anyway the machine still ran slow.

      Then, I updated Spybot with its own mechanism. I ran it and it hung halfway thru the process. Then I rebooted, ran it again, and it hung again.

      I'm no dummy but I'm new at this spyware removal thing and I cannot seem to get it right. This seems a very serious problem for the entire planet right now. Thank God I use Macs at home.

    22. Re:Just run Spybot by garcia · · Score: 1

      Last night I ran AVG and almost fucking shit... *I* had a virus. Java/Bytever. I am VERY careful to run AdAware and SpyBot (including SpyBlaster) along with AVG all on a daily basis.

      I don't install programs from untrusted sources and I usually pay close attention to weird things going on.

      Yet there it was. Three infected files.

      I guess I wasn't paranoid enough. Sad as that may be.

    23. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *3 day time period*

      I ran AdAware yesterday for the first time in 3 months, and all it picked up was 4 tracking cookies.

      I suppose you just can't stop people downloading "kewl" stuff online?

    24. Re:Just run Spybot by chosen_my_foot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you're assuming the user isn't stupid then perhaps you haven't worked very long in IT ;)

      I liken our users to toddlers. If there is any way, no matter how ridiculous, for a toddler to injure himself with a toy, he will do it. After only 6 months in IT, I see the user as a toddler and computers as their toys.

      I tell them time and again that their Windows XP computers synchronize their time with our servers, but they still install Gator's time manager because the banner says "OH NO YOUR COMPUTER CLOCK COULD BE WRONG!!! IF YOU DON'T INSTALL OUR SOFTWARE YOU SUPPORT TERRORISM!!!" As many posters in this thread have stated, you tell them time and again that MyComet cursor and all those goodies are what makes their computer run slow, but by the week's end you will return because they have installed it again and now their box is hosed.

      It's even worse when the computers on the production line turn up with these things. The cost of a stopped line per minute is quite a good bit more than my annual salary. Whoever wrote Sasser owes me a lunch break, because I had to skip it to deal with infected machines on the line. (Yeah yeah, "You should have patched sooner". No one mentions the issues that were reported with early patchers, such as frozen computers, 100% CPU usage, and inability to log in to Windows. We chose to wait until the issues were settled, and it bit us. What good is an uninstall, Mr. Anderson, if you can't boot your box?)_

    25. Re:Just run Spybot by ld_hrothgar · · Score: 1

      We (I'm in IT at KSU) use Spybot all the time because it is freeware. AdAware would be lovely to add in to catch the crap that Spybot doesn't (and I do that on my home machines) but AdAware is not FREE for University use. We'd have to buy it, and the admins won't let us. (Now I have to contact AdAware to find out how much they would want... maybe I can convince the powers that be) At this point if I find AdAware installed on a computer I have to remove it! (Nothing stops the user from putting it back on though)

    26. Re:Just run Spybot by petecarlson · · Score: 4, Informative

      Unless you were using an older version of Ad-aware, LSP-FIX would have fixed your tcp/ip stack. I used it on one of my friends computers and it worked perfectly. Of course I installed Mozilla while I was there and he asked me about it. I tried to explain that it was an opensource web browser but he just gave me a blank stare so I explained that it was an improved version of IE with a built in popup blocker and tabbed browsing.

    27. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -run AdAware
      -run SpyBot
      -run Firefox and Thunderbird (web and email)

      Do these things and the only time you will have to expose yourself to the horrors of Internet Exploder will be when you run Windows Update. You MUST use IE to access Windows Update (unless of course you want to figure out for yourself what patches to download manually)

      I manage a OS X 10.3 network, so I fart in your general direction.

    28. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm going to make the assumption that XPI can be abused in the same way -- but why abuse 5% of the browser population (and the 14 users of Netscape Navigator) when you can abuse 95% of your browsing audience?

      It's not very common, but it does happen. Check out this thread if you don't believe me.

    29. Re:Just run Spybot by DRue · · Score: 1

      after i run ad-aware and mcaffee to clean them off, one of them deleted some important files under my system folder, or at least thats what i assume because my tcp/ip wouldnt start.

      I had this happen to my mom's computer - but it wasn't tcp/ip - it was dhcp. I couldn't get her computer to grab an ip, but when i set it to a static it worked fine . /me hates spyware.. gotta go over to the girl friend's parents this weekend to spybot/adaware (i do both in safe mode).

    30. Re:Just run Spybot by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

      except for you can just turn off all activeX and XPI in both browsers. Just a thought.

    31. Re:Just run Spybot by GPLDAN · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't know if you've seen on the website, but Spybot has been under a concerted DDOS attack, off and on, for awhile. I think the fact the software is so damn effective, and the guy does just a frankly superb job of keeping signatures up, that's it's really put a thorn into the side of spybot creators everywhere.

      If you can afford it, consider donating to the guy. That's a helluva bit of software to be giving away. Either that, or nominate him for the Nobel Prize, if your on the committee that is.

    32. Re:Just run Spybot by Cylix · · Score: 1

      Oh, you haven't seen the new XPI installer plugin adware thinga-ma-joos.

      I happened across a few sites this week which used mozilla's own installer to load up some juicy spyware/adware (just like how momma used to make).

      I had accidently clicked yes.... I normally click no... actually I ALWAYS click no. In any event, I watched in horror as I realized what I had done. Then I spent 30 or so minutes with spybot, adware, and manual deletion.

      I suppose I'll just have to write my own browser to be safe.

      Of course, then I'll probably happen across a zero day exploit for Cylix's Browser.

      Just can't win...

      Though honestly, they really need to refine the laws or perhaps someone should roll their own Antivirus + Malware suite. If you can't see the signs... this is the next big thing. Symantec could easily push a few kabillion units with something like this.

      Just my 1/10th of a cent.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    33. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That Java/Bytever thing enters your computer through Mozilla/Firefox. I don't know how that thing actually gets into the computer, but it has something to do with browsing certain porn sites (Thats when the AVG warning always came up for me). I'm used to it now and just ignore it... I've gotten it so many times.

    34. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why are your users allowed to install software? The evidence supports locking down user machines to doing tasks for work only, because they have abused the previous system.

      And why are critical systems running an insecure OS with a long colourful history of security vulnerabilities? In fact any machine that doesn't need to be connected to a network shouldn't be.

    35. Re:Just run Spybot by jhagler · · Score: 1

      I'm in the same boat as you. I'm very careful about what I download, I don't have the preview pane in Outlook open, my system is behind a hardware firewall, etc. etc., and yet I came in this morning and AVG reported that it had found a virus last night.

      I guess the biggest difference between us and normal users is that a) this is the first virus I have had in a couple of years, and b) our machines had probably been cleaned of the infected files within 24 hours of their showing up thus limiting the damage.

      Just goes to show you that sometimes being careful just isn't enough.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of human stupidity -RAH
    36. Re:Just run Spybot by throwaway18 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >after i run ad-aware and mcaffee to clean them off, one of them
      >deleted some important files under my system folder, or at
      >least thats what i assume because my tcp/ip wouldnt start.

      There is at least one adware program that replaces one of the windows internet-related DLL's with it's own version. Adaware didn't handle removing it very well when I came across it months ago, I was hoping they had fixed that. It usually isn't necessasary to reinstall the machine. Removing TCP/IP from the list of installed network protocols, rebooting and reinstalling it (windows CD or setup files required) usually works.

    37. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It always amazes me how people deny doing anything and these things just magically appear. Well how come they never happen to me? I spend 50% of my day on computers during the week and I have never gotten any of this crap. When I run adAware it shows cookies and that is it. What am I doing differently? My housemate uses my computer ONE day and all of a sudden I have some stupid toolbar in IE. But she didn't install it. It just magically appeared.

    38. Re:Just run Spybot by GTRacer · · Score: 1
      Entirely (?) removing CoolWWWSearch actually required running both programs.

      In your troubleshooting, did you do any searches for info on Cool WWW Search itself? There's a purpose-built remover called CWShredder available at the bottom of that page, and lots of interesting info on the insidious nature of CWS.

      A friend of mine had the "porno favorites" version and used the CWShredder successfully. I *DID* tell her about AdAware and SpyBot though, to guard against future infestations.

      GTRacer
      - Certified 100% Spyware-free

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    39. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your an idiot. Just like half the over-reacting slashdot viewers on that previous article. Dell doesn't ship it with them. They just stopped giving tech-support on it.

      The only thing worse than a stupid person, is a vocal stupid person.

    40. Re:Just run Spybot by zrail · · Score: 1

      If I were you, I would put a *really* hard firewall between the line machines and the outside world. The cost of a generic pc and OpenBSD far outweighs the cost of lost production time.

    41. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, Spybot and AdAware are not enough.

      I was plagued with problems for over a month (more like two). I ran both of these programs continuously and was never able to remove the problem completely. I would remove everything that was found by Spybot and AdAware, and it would seem clean--until I rebooted that is. The damn crap would reinstall itself when I would reboot.

      I was pulling my hair out with this sh!t coming back constantly and thinking that I would have to do a complete reinstall.

      What eventually worked: Bazooka

      It tells you how to remove things manually (not for the layman, but no problem for the /.er) and is in-f*cking-credible. After about 8 weeks of hell, I found this and was able to remove all of the problem software within minutes. Plus, the software is free.
      In case you were wondering, the app killing me the worst was WinPup . Grrrrr.

    42. Re:Just run Spybot by NatasRevol · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because the CEO/CFO/president of the company said so.

      End of story. Set it up that way or get fired. Job security (lots of it) or none. Your choice.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    43. Re:Just run Spybot by SomeGuyFromCA · · Score: 1

      > I happened across a few sites this week which used mozilla's own installer to load up some juicy spyware/adware[...] I [...] clicked yes

      So go to about:config and turn off XPI. If there's something you need to install, explicitly turn it on, install, then turn it off.

      Yes, it's a pain, but it's better than "[spending] 30 or so minutes with spybot, adware, and manual deletion."

      --
      if the answer isn't violence, neither is your silence / freedom of expression doesn't make it alright
    44. Re:Just run Spybot by Cylix · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, I know how to turn off xpi installs.

      I'm just mentioning the new tailored for mozilla malware goodness.

      I was rather impressed someone took the time for mozilla. Our little browser has all grown up!

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    45. Re:Just run Spybot by mgpeter · · Score: 5, Informative
      just make a registry file to add info into hkey_local_machine\software\microsoft\windows\curr ent version\run key. (hint: this works on any windoze box when done as administrator)

      Instead of messing with the registry, download the Excellent Startup Control Panel from Mike Lin's Home Page. This little Utility is an excellent way to control what does and does not execute on Windows startup. Using this utility you will be amazed at what processes are automatically started, some programs, like roxio's crap, will start 3-5 processes at Windows Startup.

      It is also an excellent way to very quickly see if any Adware/Spyware is installed without running Adaware or Spybot.

    46. Re:Just run Spybot by Cylix · · Score: 1

      Um, if you pay for it, doesn't adaware have adwatch?

      My understanding is it does just that.

      Dunno about auto-updates, but if there are any command switches to run in update mode you could cron it with scheduler.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    47. Re:Just run Spybot by Seekerofknowledge · · Score: 1

      I know the spyware that you got. I believe it was New.net, and some other crap related to it. It happened to my aunt's computer, and I went over to remove it. I figured, no big deal, Ad-aware fixed it no problem. Well, her computer was broken after that. The problem was same one you had.

      The problem was in the way that Ad-aware removed the spyware. It simply deleted the files and registry settings that it needed to. Well, except for one. The spyware had installed its own hook into the Windows Tcp/ip stack. The tcp/ip stack supports hooks, in sort of a chain-link fashion. Each hook gets a turn, down the line, on working with whatever is happening. Well, since Ad-aware deleted the file, the whole system broke down. Why Windows can't recover from this and just skip over the damn hook, I don't know.

      Reinstalling was not an option, so I did some research and eventually found a fix. It will restore the registry settings for the whole tcp/ip stack. I think somebody already mentioned it. I was LSPFix.

      Anyways, just in case anyone ever sees a computer for the New.net garbage, be prepared to fix the tcp/ip stack also. I know I was caught unexpected. It took my a few days to fix, because I had to find and download the fix from my house, as her computer couldn't access the internet properly.

    48. Re:Just run Spybot by kevlar · · Score: 1

      I have had WeatherBug installed on my machine for a couple years now and AdAware has never even remotely complained about it. As far as I know, WeatherBug is (or was) not spyware...

    49. Re:Just run Spybot by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Macs seem cheaper all the time, eh? TCO really means TOTAL, not just cheap box with cheap OS. Firewalls, AV, ASW, constant updates mean MUCH more cost in the long run. Especially if you lose your data, your CCN gets passed around, etc.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    50. Re:Just run Spybot by WCMI92 · · Score: 1

      "If I was an OEM, I'd get a license from one of the companies to include AdAware/Spybot on the shipped systems and set it to run once a week. That's gotta be worth it to remove 12% of support calls!"

      A lot of the spyware comes FROM the dealers...

      Take a brand new HP Pavillion or Compaq PreSorrio that has never been connected to the internet and run Spybot/AdAware.

      It finds shit.

      --
      Corporatism != Free Market
    51. Re:Just run Spybot by Alien54 · · Score: 1
      Read this article at Spywareinfo.com. It gives a couple of good tools to immunize a home system from spyware.

      Including things to do if you *need* to run MSIE

      Useful article

      --
      "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    52. Re:Just run Spybot by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Heh. Thanks.

      I have Post Anonymously set by default since I stopped posting much a couple years ago. I post AC out of habit now. Also, it's harder to claim the elite "I don't even bother with Slashdot anymore" around all your friends when they can just finger you on Slashdot and see that you've been posting recently. ;)

    53. Re:Just run Spybot by wud · · Score: 1

      If I was an OEM, I'd get a license from one of the companies to include AdAware/Spybot on the shipped systems and set it to run once a week. That's gotta be worth it to remove 12% of support calls!

      They'll never do that because OEM computers come with software that spybot and ad-aware remove.

      --
      wud
    54. Re:Just run Spybot by gstoddart · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've come to the conclusion that between web vulnerabilities (like ActiveX controls) and the myriad of trivial pieces of software people install (funky cursors, search bars, whatever) a Windows machine is always going to be infected if you're not careful.

      My office machine I only use Mozilla except for sites that absolutely require IE, and I sure as hell don't click on or download anything that I don't explicitly want.

      My home XP box sits behind a hardware firewall, and except for *very* occasionally, I don't install much software on it -- and truthfully most of that is stuff like Mozilla and cygwin anyway.

      In both environments my e-mail gets delivered to a UNIX machine.

      To date, I've had decent luck with both machines -- only once has anything hit and that was the Windows RPC vulnerability. I suspect the usage pattern of most people is to embrace a lot of the new and shiny stuff that comes their way.

      I guess I've been using UNIX long enough that eye candy bugs me so much I don't get exposed to it. Which might be part of why i don't have problems.

      We used to have an office admin that downloaded every screen saver, animated cursor, or cutesy little flash game that was sent her way.

      I must say, Windows has improved a lot over the years. I still don't trust it to not stumble if left on its own.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    55. Re:Just run Spybot by AndroidonPPC · · Score: 1

      hmmm... worth checking out

      oh, one more trick- everybody's favorite adware/spyware removal tool:
      format c: /q

    56. Re:Just run Spybot by xangsta · · Score: 0

      i used to tell customers about these two, but half of them think i'm lying and the other half dont know how to navigate the web...good ol RTV

    57. Re:Just run Spybot by edunbar93 · · Score: 4, Insightful


      1) Install a hardware firewall.
      2) Install a software firewall.
      3) Install a quality antivirus program.
      4) Install Ad-Aware - preferably the Pro version with Ad-Watch.
      5) Install Spybot.


      Besides the 4+ hours of work that this entails, the specialized knowledge and cash required, a five item list like this is hardly what I would term "extremely easy."

      In fact, it's more like saying "Any educated person can boost the performance of his car in 5 easy steps! Just install a turbocharger..."

      And it's also worth noting that installing two firewalls like that is paranoid and stupid. Especially if the first one isn't even forwarding ports, something some 90% of computer users don't even need to do. And if you are forwarding ports, then what are you going to do on the client machine? Block those ports? What was the point of forwarding them again?

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    58. Re:Just run Spybot by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      I tell them time and again that their Windows XP computers synchronize their time with our servers, but they still install Gator's time manager

      Do you SHOW them where it does it, and tell them that Gator's ad can't differentiate between Windows 2000 and Windows XP?

      . Whoever wrote Sasser owes me a lunch break, because I had to skip it to deal with infected machines on the line

      !

      Why the HELL were production-line computers on the internet? If a box "absolutely has to be online", then it should, at most, be plugged into a LAN that has no outside connection. If your workers really need internet access, spend $20,000 and setup a seperate network for them. (For 20 Gs, I'd go with wireless and 802.11 handhelds.)

    59. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is a line machine on a a network connected to the outside anyway?

    60. Re:Just run Spybot by masoncooper · · Score: 2, Informative

      The easiest way to prevent corporate computers from becoming infected with spyware is to not run your users as local admins. I can't begin to tell you how many times I've seen companies whine and complain because it's too much work, and that it's easier to just let them install what they want.

      We have almost 200 machines and in the past 8 months have had only ONE exploited. Not only that, but a restart fixed it, because all they were able to do was change the startup page in IE.
      I'll admit it, we spent lots of research time adjusting permissions so that certain apps would run (Freakin ADP) but once it's set up, you can rest easier knowing that the users, and transitively any software running as the user) cannot write to system folders.
      Obviously, this isn't our only level of security, we run SAV CE and regularly push a set of kill bits for malicious activex components. Oh, and our last line of protection is a driver-level program called Fortres that denies any writes to certain files (EXE's, executables, others we choose). They can't even copy/rename files to and from EXE.
      We've covered most of our bases and are continually watching for holes but I'd say the most important thing an admin can do to control the desktops is to run users as users!

    61. Re:Just run Spybot by oiarbovnb · · Score: 1

      1) Install a hardware firewall. Agreed - not needed. 2) Install a software firewall. Zone Alarm is free. 3) Install a quality antivirus program. AVG Free is free. 4) Install Ad-Aware - preferably the Pro version with Ad-Watch. Ad-Aware is free. You don't really need the pro version. 5) Install Spybot. Spybot is free.

    62. Re:Just run Spybot by MandoSKippy · · Score: 1

      Yes it works, the problem is it won't stop calls. Spyboy may still corrupt the winsock by deleting the applications and not reseting the chain. (The name of this chain eludes me right now.) I ran across an example of this. Someone had run SpyBot on a friends computer and deleted all the spyware. Great. Now her internet didn't work. I could connected, but I had no DNS resoulution. (Actually, anything with TCP/UDP didn't work) I coudl Ping etc just not TCP. After a lot of research, I found that some spyware installed itself into the "chain" that winsock uses. (Please fill in the holes here, I can't find the reference page I used earlier) Basically, the way I read it was that this spyware recieved the packets BERFORE the OS, then it forwared them on to the OS. Wonderful. When the spyware was deleted, then that chain was broken and the packets wouldn't get to the OS. I had reinstall Winsock to get it working. It was a PAIN. And the actual PROBLEM was caused when the spyware was deleted. Lovely.

    63. Re:Just run Spybot by Dman33 · · Score: 1

      That is funny, we have never had a Spyware problem on our LAN in the last 8 months (since I got to this site) until just last week. I think it was Wednesday. Anyway, it takes one event on the PC which in turn installs about 14 pieces of spyware such as Bargain Buddy, Lycos SideSearch, Purity, ClockSync etc etc... ALL AT ONCE! Now, I have had 5 machines out of about 150 show up with it. NAV does not detect anthing but a generic Backdoor.Trojan in the temp internet files for the user and it quarantines it however that does not stop the problem. I have used HijackThis, CWShredder, and Spybot to clear the machines but it still involves about 20 minutes of manual removal files to clean the machine completely. I wonder if this is something new?

      Oh, and for what it is worth, these issues exposed a problem in our SUS update service so the affected machines were not patched for about a month which explains the ability to 'infect'. I guess I am glad that it is just some messy Spamware that I can re-image a few machines instead of a beastly worm that gets the entire site in 5 minutes!

    64. Re:Just run Spybot by Dr.+Smeegee · · Score: 1

      I guess I am stoopit. I see no controls for activeX under firefox.

    65. Re:Just run Spybot by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Try running PestPatrol. It'll show you what you've been missing that the ad companies haven't...

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    66. Re:Just run Spybot by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 5, Informative
      The problem is that if you have family or friends that don't know anything about computers and don't seem to care to learn, doing the above will help you out temporarily... and then cause you a huge amount of problems on Windows.

      I have one (1) stock response to all non-business tech support requests. Say this verbatim, and without sounding condescending:

      I work on computers all day, but they're the big ones like banks use, and I don't know much about the smaller ones that people have at their desks.

      I know that Apple makes a nice little Macintosh computer that doesn't cost much more than a good one like the Windows kind you've been looking at, but they're a lot easier to use by people who aren't one of us computer geeks. My own wife has one and she loves it. If you get one of those, I could probably help you with it, but like I said, I really don't know much about Windows. Sorry I can't be of more help.

      It gives them a useful solution to the problem they're having, is honest (I really don't know a whole lot about Windows versions more recent than Win98), and has one of two outcomes:

      1. They buy a Mac, love it, and think I'm a hero.
      2. They stick with their PC, but finally believe me that "has a degree in computers" doesn't mean "can fix every computer made", and find someone else to pester.

      PS: You and I know that "big computer" means "FreeBSD web server over in the machine closet", but who wants to get hung up on details?

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    67. Re:Just run Spybot by scumdamn · · Score: 3, Informative

      The best fix for Winsock corruption in XP is to delete the Winsock and Winsock2 keys from the registry, reboot, and install TCP/IP over itself (you have to browse to c:\windows\inf to get it to show up in the list) but it works nearly every time. I've been having techs do it for about a month now and it's been very successful.

    68. Re:Just run Spybot by daviddennis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I really don't think people should have to treat their computers like a fortress by installing millions of lines of complex and potentially unreliable code on their computers, just to guard against outside attacks. It's like being forced to run an armor plated car, and accepting the huge performance and fuel economy hit.

      So I run Macs, which solves all those problems and more.

      Macs are a little more expensive, yes, but the amount of time and aggravation saved is worth every penny.

      I run all Macs at home and I never get virii, never get spyware, and they keep on running at good speeds virtually forever.

      Frankly, I'm not a paranoid enough person to run Windows, and in all honesty I don't want to become one.

      I don't understand why Apple's market share hasn't soared thanks to this and other similar advantages.

      I know that one day there will be a Mac virus or two, but the economic motive just isn't there for spyware, thanks to Apple's low market share. I think it would have to double or triple, which it isn't doing any time soon, to justify spyware development.

      So my answer is: Get a Mac. You'll be happier. It's prettier than Windows. It's slicker, too. And you won't get these pesky problems. Are they slower? In some cases, but armor-plating your PC is going to make it run a lot worse than the Mac, if the complaints in my company about our AV software are any indication.

      D

    69. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    70. Re:Just run Spybot by ionpro · · Score: 1

      Unforunately, Spybot S&D doesn't remove everything. If I were to choose one program to run, I'd choose Ad-aware. Not only does it typically catch more stuff, it also has an easier interface if the lUser ever has to use it.

      My qualifications? I deal with around 25 spyware-related calls per week at a teir 1 helpdesk for a top 20 university. That's of a total of 35-40 calls, so you can tell that it is far more than 12% of my workload...

    71. Re:Just run Spybot by Naffer · · Score: 1

      More then likely the Java/Bytever was a javascript virus sitting in your temporary internet files that IE had decided not to run. I see them on my machine's scans occasionally, but they never do more then sit idleing in the Temp internet files. I've never seen one running.

    72. Re:Just run Spybot by zerocool^ · · Score: 4, Insightful


      I think it needs to be reiterated: It's a good start.

      It's a huge first step. I now run firefox, it's the default browser on my windows box. If you've read my comments in the past, I've always been a fan of I.E., and I still am, to be honest with you. I think I.E. is faster, and renders things better than Firefox, firefox (even though it's no where near moz's bloat) still uses more memory, plus there's this annoying javascript transparent thing that Firefox doesn't deal with well, and it just has several little annoying things I don't like.

      BUT.

      After casual surfing the web (with google toolbar installed to block popups) on I.E. a couple of months ago, I proceeded to get spyware left and right that I didn't even know about! The damn javascript buffer overflow that installs cool web search got me. I had no idea I got it until I ran adaware. Then I got some freaking spyware bug that deleted windows media player and replaced it with a spyware app or a virus or something.

      This is just from CASUAL web surfing. I didn't download anything, I didn't run anything, I never clicked "ok" on any of the "you are about to download and install 'CLICK HERE TO ACCEPT OUR AGREEMENT'" things. This was all exploits that hijacked my browser and installed spyware.

      Fuck. That.

      Firefox only has two advantages over IE+google toolbar: Tabbed Browsing (which i'm starting to like), and security. Until recently, they weren't reason enough to switch. Now, they are.

      So, it needs to be pointed out: Yes, there are still ways to get spyware even when running firefox. It's true. BUT, firefox is a HUGE first step. I don't have anything worse than a few tracking cookies now.

      AND it needs to be said: It does not mean you're a n00b l00ser if you run I.E. and you get spyware. It's nothing you did wrong. Even powerusers, whatever that means, still get spyware in I.E. You don't have to click to install anymore. It used to be enough to know that you shouldn't download and run stuff that you didn't know what it did. It's not anymore.

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
    73. Re:Just run Spybot by FictionPimp · · Score: 1
      sorry, i guess I didn't clarify, you can turn off activeX in IE and in firefox you can turn off xpi.

      But, if you want activeX for firefox (god only knows why) try this

    74. Re:Just run Spybot by pilgrim23 · · Score: 1

      And if the consumer buys a Dell, HP, Compaq, Gateway...all the friendly Free With Your Purchase software preinstalled on the box...includes a wealth of adware and spyware.

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    75. Re:Just run Spybot by Seumas · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That really isn't four hours worth of work. If it's your first time, it might be - but I'm not talking about how extremely easy it is for grandma. I'm talking about how easy it is, in the grand scheme of things. Certainly, to do the above you would need to have some rudimentary education about the machine in front of you to perform those five steps - but in my experience, only those who have that education (beyond how to login, surf and manipulate the max/min/close window buttons) are even aware of the problem and the steps needed to handle it.

      It isn't as difficult as you seem to suggest, though. A hardware firewall is common sense and even your ISP will instruct you to install one when you pick up your cable or DSL modem (or when they come out to install it). Not knowing you need a hardware firewall is like not knowing you need to buy a modem to use the internet. And they aren't that expensive. A high quality new one is about $80. A decent one can be had for $50. Basic installation is simple. Plug it in, change the admin password. Done.

      Installing an antivirus program is also simple and has been drilled into every user. Most computers come with one, even if it's only a trial subscription. You can get decent ones for free (Grisoft's AVG, for example). They're easy to configure and usually have adequate walk-throughs.

      Ad-Aware is easy to install and free. Same with Spybot. You might need to read a little before making full use of them, but just having them installed offers more security than not having them at all.

      As for having both a hardware firewall and a software firewall - sure it's paranoid. The thing is that software firewalls are inadequate and ineffective. If you allow what you think is a legitimate program to have acces to the net (a windows service or MSIE for example), you may also be unwittingly allowing a sub-component to piggy-back with it.

      I don't expect a software firewall to protect me or the family/friends I install them for. I like having one installed so I can see what applications are trying to get out. If something strange is trying to get out and it hasn't been caught by Ad-Aware, SpyBot or AVG/Kaspersky - I want to know about it. I could watch a netstat all day long - or I could just watch for pop-up notification sin the system tray.

      In fact, it's more like saying "Any educated person can boost the performance of his car in 5 easy steps! Just install a turbocharger..."

      But it isn't. This isn't about boosting your performance. This is about knowing to lock your car's doors, not locking your keys in the car, not leaving your keys in the ignition or the car running while you stop at 7-11, changing your oil regularly, checking the tire pressure occasionally, keeping your tags up to date and possibly having a car-alarm installed.

      Any educated person should know not to drive their Lexus through the worst part of town, stop in front of a 7-11 with a bunch of crackheads standing outside by the pay-phones and leaving their keys in the car and the engine running while they go into the store and buy a coke and nachos.

    76. Re:Just run Spybot by anti-trojan · · Score: 1

      SpyBot.info, which redirects to safer-networking.org has been under a DDos attack. Try www.safer-networking.net instead:

      "After at least three days of standing up against the attacks that have already hit some other anti-spyware sites (including our support forum at Net-Integration), safer-networking.org was temporarily down last night as well, while our provider was tightening the systems to make them proof against any further attacks. We apologize for the outtime."

    77. Re:Just run Spybot by Alan · · Score: 1

      I don't know about spyware in particular, but only once have I bought a computer system from the store, and that's it. My GF and I got a computer for her grandmother, and me being the computer guy got to get it all set up and ready for use. I figured that it'd be easier than assembling one from scratch, she'd be able to call the store if she had problems, etc etc.

      Three versions of AOL, countless icons on the desktop for free this, unlimited that... Oh, lets not forget the 28 critical updates required just to get the system in a state that I'd feel semi-comfortable letting someone connect it to the internet with.

      Never again.

    78. Re:Just run Spybot by Eggplant62 · · Score: 1
      http://www.spybot.info . That's all it takes. Have it run on people's windows startup and they're set.


      Don't forget to grab copies of AdAware and Spywareblaster while you're at it. AdAware often times catches stuff that Spybot misses. Spywareblaster will create null registry entries and faux empty files that will make spyware installation proggies think that they're already installed. Then, make certain you've hit "Immunize" from the Spybot S&D menu. It will catch items that Spywareblaster won't.
    79. Re:Just run Spybot by DougMelvin · · Score: 1
      Spywareblaster : http://www.javacoolsoftware.com/spywareblaster.htm l

      Uses a little-known registry feature called the "kill bit" to prevent various spyware from even getting installed.. currently holds almost 3000 items in it's database.

      BTW: nice job of slashdotting Spybot's website. :-)
      I hope the spywareblaster site can handle it.

      A decent alternative to Spybot is Adaware: http://www.lavasoftusa.com/software/adaware/

      and as always.. HAVE AN ACTIVE VIRUS SCANNER!!!! (AVG free edition: http://www.grisoft.com/us/us_dwnl_free.php)
      This virus solution is full featured:
      • Automatic updates
      • Integrated Email protection (incomming AND outgoing)
      • Scheduled scans
      • realtime (on-access) protection
      • Oh and, IT'S FREE FOR HOME USE


      I have been using AVG for a couple of years now, I have noticed NO performance hit, even while playing eve-online.. :-)
      --
      Reality is in the mind of the beholder - me 1996
    80. Re:Just run Spybot by Naffer · · Score: 1

      You have safety in obscurity. I guarantee you that as soon as the spyware companies see a market worth exploiting in the MAC community, they're going to write malware for Mac. Do macs not get viruses because of their ultra sleek look and superior OS? Nope, they don't get em because virus writers prefer to write for the more popular OS.

    81. Re:Just run Spybot by Pandora's+Vox · · Score: 1

      BEST SIG EVAR

      *grins*

      -Leigh

    82. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of my family thinks:

      1. A port is a place where a ship docks.

      2. A firewall separates brick row houses.

      3. Windows Update is when you put away the screens in October and put them back on in April.

    83. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Install a hardware firewall. Agreed - not needed.

      What?! Please tell me you don't trust a Windows machine with nothing more than a software firewall between itself and the internet?

      Software firewalls offer less security than people attribute to them. Not to mention, I've seen cases where a firewall was somehow disabled or crashed while the user was away for a few days. That's a lot of time to leave your machine connected to the internet without any protection.

      http://tooleaky.zensoft.com/

      Also, products like ZoneAlarm often have bugs and holes that leave your system vulnerable until they are fixed and you get around to upgrading them. And don't forget that there are applications like the terrible Black Ice Defender...

      I would say the software firewall is not necessary. The hardware firewall is.

    84. Re:Just run Spybot by wackysootroom · · Score: 2, Informative

      We've had the same problem on our network until we banned people from downloading microsoft executable and certain types of archive files using our network alltogther.

      Our company firewall redirects all http traffic through a transparent squid, where we have a bunch of ACLs that allow and disallow certain things. All of the non standard HTTP(s) ports are blocked at the firewall.

      We are a smallish shop of only ~50 users, and this all works out fine. No more spyware/crapware/malware headaches.

    85. Re:Just run Spybot by Alan+Hicks · · Score: 1

      Whoa! Some one needs to learn HTML. Those things you're missing are
      .

      --
      Slackware, what else when it must be secure, stable, and easy?
    86. Re:Just run Spybot by LqqkOut · · Score: 1
      After running spybot and ad-aware, also be sure to reset the IE security settings!!

      I just about railed on one of my users the 3rd time I had to uninstall spyware from her machine, then I realized that "run activex controls marked unsafe" and a whole host of other insecurity settings were set to enable.

      Have any of you had good long-term luck with spybot's Immunize feature?

      --

      -- In Soviet Russia, radio listens to YOU!

    87. Re:Just run Spybot by rogabean · · Score: 1

      thats all and good..for the people who spyware hasnt already broken their net access...

      being an ISP technical support monkey... its alot harder then that to help most these people, or to explain why I cant help them =\

      --
      "why don't you just slip into something more comfortable...like a coma!"
    88. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You definitely need more than just one program. This toolkit works for me:

      1) Spybot - http://www.safer-networking.org/

      2) Spyware Blaster - http://www.javacoolsoftware.com/spywareblaster.htm l

      3) Adaware - http://www.lavasoftusa.com/

      4) Bazooka Adware and Spyware scanner - http://www.kephyr.com/spywarescanner/index.html

    89. Re:Just run Spybot by oiarbovnb · · Score: 1
      yeah yeah...but you need to learn how to finish sentences! what were you even trying to say?

      Those things you're missing are

    90. Re:Just run Spybot by megarich · · Score: 1

      I somewhat feel your pain man. Were mostly a unix shop except for secretaries and high execs but even those small amount of windows machines gives me such a headache. I don't patch machines unless asked to because quite frankly I don't have the time to always mess around with that shit(there's only 2 of us to maintain a 100+ machines). Not to mention if you take over someone's machine for a large amount of time they start having a hissy fit.

    91. Re:Just run Spybot by Seumas · · Score: 1

      It would be nice if this were a world where you could just put everyone on a Mac or Linux and leave it be. Unfortunately, most people are major cheapskates. That's why they're trying to get you (friend or family member that you are) to fix things for them. They don't want to pay a few hundred bucks for their computer, much less the cost for a Mac. I've let my family play with my TiBook and everyone always loves it, but the sticker price puts them off.

      Money wasn't an issue for me when I spent $3,200 on my TiBook, $2,200 on my 23" Cinedisplay, $500 on my iPod and $250 on my Airport. One day during a lunchbreak. There's not much call for a Mac in my line of work though as I deal mostly with NT and Solaris. But it's sure nice to have the flexibility of an Apple laptop when you need to move around from network to network and not spend half the day reconfiguring everything. :)

      As for Linux, well... As much as I'd like to migrate them to it, that's not going to happen. It's nice to fantasize about masking the desktop to look like it's really just Windows, but people notice the difference. And people who have used their favorite browser, email client or other app for any length of time notice immediately that you are giving them something different. Besides, most people want to be able to play some videogames on their machines. Hell, that's the entire reason *I* even have a Windows machine in my home at all.

    92. Re:Just run Spybot by anti-trojan · · Score: 1

      Firefox is actually faster than IE in many occasions. I think you will begin to feel it once you get more used to it.

    93. Re:Just run Spybot by Spoing · · Score: 1
      1. Set it up that way or get fired. Job security (lots of it) or none. Your choice.

      Quantify why this edict is a Bad Idea. Don't harp on it, though make sure that they are aware that this is an ongoing problem with costs that can be solved with a policy change.

      (Yes, I realize that doesn't work often and I understand why. Worth a shot!)

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    94. Re:Just run Spybot by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      See, the problem is if you run IE. Even if you get an xpi popup in Mozilla, you still need to click something to get the spyware installed.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    95. Re:Just run Spybot by Seumas · · Score: 1

      AMEN.

      I hate when people ask me random Windows questions or expect me to know what is wrong with their computer when they describe some strange Windows behavior and they get upset when I shrug and tell them I have no clue. They seem to act like I must be stupid if I have a career in technology, but can't tell them how to fix their particular glitch. I don't care to deal with Windows beyond securing it and then installing and playing my videogames. I save my Mac, Linux and Solaris boxes for real work. It would be nice if people could comprehend that just because you can write code and support enterprise networks doesn't mean you know every obscure thing in the world.

      And when I think of "big computer", I actually think of... say... an E15K and up. ;)

    96. Re:Just run Spybot by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Run Firefox, on Linux (custom secure install, which has security patches installed daily), on a read-only filesystem. Pretty darn secure. I'd be impressed by anyone that could infect it. ;)

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    97. Re:Just run Spybot by notanatheist · · Score: 1

      Screw that. Hide Internet F***ing Exploiter and ONLY USE MOZILLA and OPERA.

    98. Re:Just run Spybot by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      When you can't access the internet because New Dot Net or something equally as sinister has screwed up your TCP/IP stack nearly beyond repair, that is NOT all it takes.

      And by the way, where I work (outsourcer for Compaq / HP tech support), the 12% estimate is probably very very low, unless they're counting the recent Sasser worm calls. I'd say, normally, it's a little more like 50%.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    99. Re:Just run Spybot by Spoing · · Score: 1

      A firewall won't solve this problem.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    100. Re:Just run Spybot by Red+Alastor · · Score: 1

      You still use Outlook, don't be surprised that you get viruses.

      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
    101. Re:Just run Spybot by TheLink · · Score: 1

      I've tried it recently and it doesn't seem to fix stuff cleanly - I had to manually delete stuff from registry before all the spyware got deactivated.

      Anyway that misses the point. I don't see why the FBI etc are busy throwing silly kids into jail but letting this spyware people get away with their crap.

      If the spyware people can do what they do just because of some stupid "agreement" then the worm makers could do the same thing. Sheesh.

      One day I'm going to start putting an EULA on my stuff, if you click on it, you agree to give me all rights to you, your property, your family, friends, relatives, their property etc. Doh.

      And you also agree to quack like a duck everytime you hear the words/names "Microsoft", "RIAA", "MPAA".

      --
    102. Re:Just run Spybot by Technician · · Score: 1

      If you're an educated user, shoring up your home network is extremely simple:

      It's very simple and secure.. Remove the floppy and CD drives, Then remove the cable modem, or dial up modem, or DSL modem. ;-)

      Part of my home network is this way so I am sure to have a running machine to use to scan the other machines when things go wrong.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    103. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you noticed that you're constantly getting new spyware, that your machine has slowed to a crawl and you often crash out of any web applications and that you often get spam even though you never posted your email anywhere? That's because you run WeatherBug. YES it is spyware. YES it is known to cause system instabilities. YES it does crash webapps. YES it does hijack DNS. YES it does download and install mal/spyware, kind of like a crackwhore who breaks into your house while you're out and invites all thier other crackhead friends to have a party.
      Have you tried using another protection tool? You might also notice that sleazebags like Gator et al have an SCO-like attitude towards anyone who correctly classifies thier buggy virus-like crap as spyware.
      If you didn't know, then you must be living with blinders on. Or you're shilling.

    104. Re:Just run Spybot by Allen+Zadr · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I fully agree with you here. I make between $70 and $140 every time one of my co-workers' teenagers decides that their 'internet connection is not optimized'.

      I try to teach them how to take care of it themselves, and they have no interest in learning.
      Most lawyer tasks are the same, easy to do yourself, but there's a whole bunch of info to learn before you can get it right. I have no interest in learning law-craft.

      --
      Kinetic stupidity has a new brand leader: Allen Zadr.
    105. Re:Just run Spybot by maximilln · · Score: 1

      -----
      Anyway that misses the point. I don't see why the FBI etc are busy throwing silly kids into jail but letting this spyware people get away with their crap
      -----
      I agree. It's not about enforcing the spirit of the law. It's about manipulating the letter of the law to keep the moneybags happy.

      -----
      If the spyware people can do what they do just because of some stupid "agreement" then the worm makers could do the same thing
      -----
      The precedent was set by MS in '95 when they released a beta edition of Windows to the general public. Their EULA was the umbrella which allowed them to escape any liability. The US has been building unethical businesses on top of a flawed foundation ever since.

      If MS could've gotten tanked over the Win95 debacle we never would've seen the .com boom. We also never would've seen the .com bust. We also would have preserved at least a measure of internet integrity.

      If it doesn't make sense then you're thinking in a progressive, logical fashion. Switch to a thought pattern of "follow the money" and everything will make perfect sense.

      --
      +++ATHZ 99:5:80
    106. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Sigh*. Yeah, and there's a lot more exploits of Apache than NT...right?

      No, Macs aren't less afflicted by this crap because of their sleek look; but maybe their superior OS, which was designed with security in mind, has something to do with it.

      Look into it.

    107. Re:Just run Spybot by SomeGuyFromCA · · Score: 1

      > And it's also worth noting that installing two firewalls like that is paranoid and stupid.

      Ahem. Many hardware SOHO firewalls don't inspect outgoing traffic - mainly for end-user ease of use reasons - and to block X or Y program off the net completely, you need a software suite living on the same machine.

      Before you call someone paranoid or stupid, make sure you're not just ignorant.

      --
      if the answer isn't violence, neither is your silence / freedom of expression doesn't make it alright
    108. Re:Just run Spybot by kevlar · · Score: 1

      No, I haven't had _any_ problems. Gator is also not installed. I more than likely have a really old version that was pre-spyware. It doesn't automatically start up in my system tray. When I do run it though, it opens pop-ups, which is why I don't really use it anymore.

      Very weird.

    109. Re:Just run Spybot by SomeGuyFromCA · · Score: 1

      > 1) - 5) [snipped]

      6) Install Firebird/Fox or Moz or Opera or whatever. NOT Avant, because that's still IE. Install Pegasus or Thunderbird or Eudora or whatever and dump Outlook.

      > If someone runs out of gas on the freeway or blows something becuase they never knew they had to change oil in a car - we think they're idiots. But if you are equally as daft about technology (especially computers), you're forgiven.

      Remember, it's considered manly and macho to be a car expert. Computer experts are widely seen as pasty, overweight, greasy-haired, acne-marked antisocialites.

      --
      if the answer isn't violence, neither is your silence / freedom of expression doesn't make it alright
    110. Re:Just run Spybot by Hatta · · Score: 1

      It's a hassle just dealing with this for one person. Now imagine if your grandmother, an uncle, your mom, two siblings, a neighbor, a girlfriend and two family friends all have you on the hook like this? It never ends. And then people wonder why techies are becoming more and more reluctant to help and more abrasive.

      Explain to them that when you install closed source software, there's no telling what you're getting. When you install open source software, everything in the program is available for inspection, so people can't hide nasty things in it. A trojan horse analogy helps. STD analogys are also useful.

      Offer to help them convert, give them a nice flashy distro like mandrake or suse and they'll never bother you about spyware again. This is a great opportunity to raise awareness about the importance of OSS.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    111. Re:Just run Spybot by kevlar · · Score: 1
    112. Re:Just run Spybot by michrech · · Score: 1

      That may be, but a proxy filter will. If they can't access the sites that have the crap, there will be no crap.

      --
      bork bork bork!
    113. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I accidently installed some software. Right away it wanted to call home and got nasty when it couldn't. I tried running Spybot and Adaware but none of them could get rid of that damned Win XP.

    114. Re:Just run Spybot by kevlar · · Score: 1

      Yes, did you? Did you read those links carefully?

    115. Re:Just run Spybot by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      They seem to act like I must be stupid if I have a career in technology, but can't tell them how to fix their particular glitch.

      Ugh. I used to get that one all the time: "I don't understand. Don't you have a degree in Computer Science?"

      It would be nice if people could comprehend that just because you can write code and support enterprise networks doesn't mean you know every obscure thing in the world.

      An analogy that Joe Sixpack can understand without knowing a thing about computers: it's like the difference between a bulldozer and a Chevy. Even if you fix big hydraulic systems all day long, you may not be able to fix the cruise-control on a Cavalier. Unfortunately, I bet that mechanics get the same sorts of questions from their friends, so that may not be the best example.

      And when I think of "big computer", I actually think of... say... an E15K and up. ;)

      I do to, but if you can figure out a way to explain "Xeon" and "SCSI" to my mom when she asks what I do all day, then feel free to share. For now, "I work on big computers on the Internet" is the most accurate description of my job that most people will accept without getting glazed eyes. :)

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    116. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My company has approved Spybot for use, and our internal software "store" has it available for installation. It will probably be included in the standard disk image eventually.

    117. Re:Just run Spybot by KodaK · · Score: 1

      No, Macs aren't less afflicted by this crap because of their sleek look; but maybe their superior OS, which was designed with security in mind, has something to do with it.

      You know that noise people make when they're trying to be clever and sneeze and say "bullshit" at the same time? I hate that, so I'll just say it outright:

      Bullshit.

      I've got nothing against OSX, and as a matter of fact, I'm seriously considering buying a Mac for my project studio, but to say it was designed with security in mind -- well, that's a load and you don't know what the hell you're talking about. I suspect you know this and I'm feeding a troll, but I really hate to see complete misinformation being spouted like this.

      There are (sadly) very, very few operating systems that are designed with security in mind, and OSX isn't one of them. Unix isn't one of them. Security is just as much slap-it-on-when-we're-forced-too in the Mac world as it is in the Windows world, and to a (slightly) lesser degree the larger *nix world.

      Look into it.

      Yeah, you too.

      --
      --J(K) DOS is like Unix in exactly the same way that a pinto is like an aircraft carrier.
    118. Re:Just run Spybot by twoshortplanks · · Score: 2, Informative
      You do get pesky Mac problems though. Like the hardware falling to bits *all* the time. Seriously, I've sent my mac back to apple twice. The person across the desk from me sent his new mac back as soon as he got it (fried mainboard) - and he's sent his old one back several times. The other person opposite me sent his better half's back three times. My flatmate had to send his TiBook back as soon as it arrived. And it seems everyone else I know (and I'm not exagerating here) has sent theirs back too. It's like one of the things you just have to accept - the hardware *will* fall to bits.

      This isn't to say that your points are invalid. This isn't to say that I don't still keep buying apple hardware. But the build quality sucks! I'm not sure if I recommended one to a friend how I'd feel saying "Oh yeah, that needs to go back to the shop. They all do that".

      --
      -- Sorry, I can't think of anything funny to say here.
    119. Re:Just run Spybot by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Speak for yourself, I mostly draft & build GIS (mostly), but nearly everyone I know would consider me a computer specialist.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    120. Re:Just run Spybot by mwood · · Score: 1

      Or just whip up a little VBscript/Jscript to trawl the process list, installed software, etc. via WMI. The Scripting Guys at MS probably published most of the required code already. You can even walk ADS containers or whole (sub)trees and scan each host remotely from the comfort of your office, or have the script mail you a report and let Task Manager run it for you.

      Or package Spybot as a .MSI and push it out with a policy.

      Really, many Windoze sysadmin.s are working way too hard.

    121. Re:Just run Spybot by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      I dunno, what's all that 666 and FU in the file name? (Just kidding. I've used it before with no problems, although I don't like to keep an active scanner going all the time on my own machine. The idea is to block the paths a virus could enter, not hope that the scanner catches it.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    122. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I have one (1) stock response to all non-business tech support requests. Say this verbatim, and without sounding condescending:

      That'll be pretty difficult, considering...

      I know that Apple makes a nice little Macintosh computer

      ...is a condescending phrase no matter how you intone it. The keyword is "little." Most Macs aren't smaller than typical PCs, even the iMacs. Compare the G5 with your typical geekbox and chances are the G5's larger. Sure, the 12" iBooks are pretty small, but the 17" PowerBooks sure aren't, and you didn't say iBook.

      The use of little, given that it doesn't correspond with size, implies that the Mac is inherently "less" than any other PC -- something that's been argued ad infinitum for sure, but I think most people here would agree that the Mac eclipses Windows and Linux in many ways. In this specific context, the use of the word "little" seems to only be used to state that the user isn't good enough for Windows or Linux.

      That's pretty condescending.

      that doesn't cost much more than a good one like the Windows kind you've been looking at

      Priced them recently? Oh yes they do. Most people would call a difference of a few hundred dollars for comparable hardware "much more." Maybe you make more than my friends. Some of us, myself included, think the software's worth it -- but it's still "much more."

      but they're a lot easier to use by people who aren't one of us computer geeks.

      That was true when you compared Mac OS 7.5.1 with Windows 3.1. Today? Is killing a stuck Classic mode session run by another user by dropping to the terminal, doing a ps xa, and sudoing to kill the process really easier than doing the three-fingered salute to get the task manager and clicking "end task"? These days, most tasks in Windows are comparatively as easy as tasks in Mac OS X. Except, admittedly, on the system stability and spyware removal front. Why not just be upfront and say that a Mac's more stable rather than "easy to use"? There's a big difference between the two.

      My own wife has one and she loves it.

      Do you tell this to men you're recommending a computer to? Or are Macs only good for women? Since we already know from your earlier statement that Macs aren't as good as PCs, what does that say about your view of women? Why not just say that *you* have a Mac at home, and that you and your wife love it?

      Next time, try: "Have you looked at a Macintosh? They may be more expensive, but they're as easy to use and tend to be more stable (or harder to break) than Windows boxes. We've got one at home, and the whole family loves it."

    123. Re:Just run Spybot by nolife · · Score: 1

      Why cant you? Almost any software can be script installed, pushed or pulled including SB. SB also includes a local update package to get updates from your own network similar to Norton LUAU and MS update for local networks.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    124. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It does not mean you're a n00b l00ser if you run I.E. and you get spyware.

      yes it does. anyone who followed the whole activex thing back in 1997 or so could have predicted this. anyone.

    125. Re:Just run Spybot by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      AVG is FREE

      and you get what you pay for.

      I had some random virus that corrupted Nero just enough enough to make it think it was altered in a bad way. I had no virus scanner. I was referred to AVG.

      in the process of fixing it, AVG wouldn't repair any of my executables, just "quarantine" them. Bloody useless I thought, then I went to "unquarantine." The "unquarantine button" was next to the "toast all quarantined files" button.

      Guess which one I clicked?

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    126. Re:Just run Spybot by Gid1 · · Score: 1
      1) Install a hardware firewall. Agreed - not needed.

      Apart from the fact that Zone Alarm and all the other software firewalls for Joe Q. Public run on Windows. Anyone who relies on any security package running on Windows is really asking for it. You can't build good security on a wobbly foundation.

      Regardless of the typical anti-Microsoft nonsense, I don't think anyone can really believe that Microsoft has a good or even acceptable track record for security or reliability, compared to either embedded systems or *nix boxes.

      Hardware firewalls just seem prudent to me. Not because they're hardware, but because they're dedicated, non-Microsoft and usually not messed about with.

      As for me, I just use Macs instead. A while ago I decided that the premium price of Apple kit was easily overwhelmed by the years of wasted time spent trying to get Microsoft products to work properly, reliably and securely.

    127. Re:Just run Spybot by oiarbovnb · · Score: 1
      blah blah blah...

      How come I hear about situations like this, but it never happens to me? Maybe I'm not moronic enough to install every free application that comes my way, or maybe I'm just lucky.

      I use AVG Free, ZoneAlarm, and regularly install the latest updates from the windowsupdate site. I never get viruses, I never get worms, I never have spyware on my machine. The most Ad-Aware and Spybot find when I run them on my machine are cookies...

      I don't know what everyone else does to get their machines infected all the time...maybe everyone else is just unlucky...

    128. Re:Just run Spybot by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      ...is a condescending phrase no matter how you intone it. The keyword is "little." Most Macs aren't smaller than typical PCs, even the iMacs.

      Don't be an ass. An LCD iMac is a little machine.

      Compare the G5 with your typical geekbox and chances are the G5's larger.

      The typical geekbox owner won't be pestering me for tech support every time we meet, so your (albeit true) statement is essentially never applicable to my real life conversations.

      The use of little, given that it doesn't correspond with size,

      Since we ruled out the first part, we can safely reject the second.

      Priced them recently? Oh yes they do. Most people would call a difference of a few hundred dollars for comparable hardware "much more."

      People bring up this imaginary argument every single time. Spec a PC with a DVD burner, Firewire, a 17" LCD screen, Ethernet, and all of the other niceties that come stock on an iMac, then discard all of the beige-box machines that weren't engineered so much as assembled from parts on the shelf, then add in the software costs. That Mac isn't quite so expensive now. Rejected.

      Is killing a stuck Classic mode session run by another user by dropping to the terminal, doing a ps xa, and sudoing to kill the process really easier than doing the three-fingered salute to get the task manager and clicking "end task"?

      First, we own no programs that run in Classic mode, and neither will 99% of users who are buying their first Mac these days. Two, ever hear of the "Force quit" menu/keystroke that brings up an application manager and lets you choose the task to kill? Rejected.

      Do you tell this to men you're recommending a computer to? Or are Macs only good for women?

      Are you always a sexist ass, or just on Slashdot? If it's good enough for my wife, it's good enough for my neighbor.

      Why not just say that *you* have a Mac at home, and that you and your wife love it?

      Mainly becuase I don't have a Mac; my wife does. It's hers, it's on her desk, and I don't remember if I even have a login on it.

      Next time, try: "Have you looked at a Macintosh? They may be more expensive, but they're as easy to use and tend to be more stable (or harder to break) than Windows boxes. We've got one at home, and the whole family loves it."

      Since each of those details is completely wrong, I think I'll stick to my own wording, thanks.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    129. Re:Just run Spybot by nolife · · Score: 1

      I suggest pstools, specifically pslist. These handy apps and a little scripting can do wonders on a Windows network. Of course spyware is the least of your problems if you are responsible for a large network of workstations (linux or MS) and you do not already have some type of package management and reporting solution in use.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    130. Re:Just run Spybot by oiarbovnb · · Score: 1

      I'm the usual Joe Q who uses my windows machine at home for email, games (Urban Terror Mod), and surfing the net...I don't need to have the best security in the world. Besides, no matter what I do, someone, somewhere could hack into my computer in a matter of minutes. I know that. But because I'm nobody with nothing special on my machine, I don't see a need to get all paranoid about it. I think running a free software firewall, a free anti-virus program, and keeping windows up to date is about all you need to do if you are an average user...

    131. Re:Just run Spybot by oiarbovnb · · Score: 1
      I tell you that I do trust my windows machine with nothing more than a software firewall between itself and the internet.

      Oh - I forgot, and this is going to really get you pissed. I also have a wireless router with wireless enabled, and no WEP (like WEP is actually equivalent anyways).

      Yup. I rock. I have no security on my network at my house and I don't give a shit. As soon as I get hacked, or my identity stolen, I'll let you all know.

    132. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Whoever wrote Sasser owes me a lunch break, because I had to skip it to deal with infected machines on the line.


      You are a sysadmin and you actually get a lunch break! Wow! Are you guys accepting resumes?

    133. Re:Just run Spybot by whats_a_zip · · Score: 1

      If you like IE try slimbrowser - www.flashpeak.com - I run it at work, and at home. Work is on Win2kpro, at home, XPpro. Runs well on both, has tabbed browsing, and built in pop up blocker. And it's really compact, I think it uses some of IE's underpinnings, but I haven't gotten much, other than the run of the mill spyware you get from daily surfing. Oh, and keep the OS patched, a pain, but a must.

    134. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      When you're Joe Blow at home, that's fine. But when you administer dozens, hundreds, thousands of Win boxes and you can't automate installing/configuring/running Spybot, things are a bit different.

      Not much of an administrator, are you. You can easily automate installing/configuring/running Spybot.

    135. Re:Just run Spybot by mwood · · Score: 1

      [Spybot seems to clean only one user at a time]

      Probably it only works over Registry hives that happen to be loaded when it runs. So when you're logged on as A, B's USER.dat is not loaded and isn't cleaned. Tsk tsk, sloppy, it should walk the profile list and load 'em all under a temporary key.

    136. Re:Just run Spybot by The+Spoonman · · Score: 1

      But when you administer dozens, hundreds, thousands of Win boxes and you can't automate installing/configuring/running Spybot, things are a bit different.

      Yes, it should be easier. If the machines are locked down like they're supposed to be, spyware is not an issue because the users can't install software, activex is disabled, etc, etc, etc. If they're not locked down, then the problem is with the admin, not the software.

      --
      Which is more painful? Going to work or gouging your eye out with a spoon? Find out!
      http://www.workorspoon.com
    137. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CWShredder doesn't always do the trick. I picked up a variant of CWS a while back. I was running AdAware, Spybot, SpywareGuard, SpywareBlaster, HijackThis, and a couple others (can't remember the names anymore), in addition to CWShredder, and a variation of CWShredder that targets a more sophisticated newer version of CWS. Still no luck. The only thing that finally eliminated it once and for all was formatting/reinstalling the OS.

    138. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I did all five of those things. Add to that the fact that I'm actually fairly knowledgable about computers in general, and know quite a bit about the things that one should and should not do, particularly online, in order to avoid spyware.

      Still, I managed to pick up CoolWWWSearch somehow. Nothing I did would get rid of it, until I finally formatted/reinstalled the OS.

    139. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You still use Outlook, don't be surprised that you get viruses

      Do you realize how predictable that comment was. When I finished reading the parent post I was totally expecting a follow-up post just like yours and lo and behold there it is.

      Stupid anti-M$ comments like that are so predictable that you could create a simple script that posts them. Create a simple little bot that just reads post and when it sees a post that reads something like "...use Outlook..." it automatically replies with a comment saying something like: "You still use Outlook, don't be surprised that you get viruses." I guess that is why they call posters like you slashbots.

    140. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Complacency kills!

      I gave a user a machine (after cleaning from malware and spyware), with Firefox, Thunderbird, AVG and Zone Alarm installed and configured. They ran for a long time without incident.

      They called just this morning, machine was down. Something hijacked NIC card and installed a PPP adapter with address 0.0.0.0 as main connection ( also installed into Zone Alarm as trusted zone )

      The setup was initially good, but never is it always secure. While Active-X is a no-no, it is not the only vector of infection. Users rank number 1.

    141. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it was an improved version of IE with a built in popup blocker and tabbed browsing.

      Good Answer - I'll use that!

    142. Re:Just run Spybot by jhagler · · Score: 2, Informative

      I know that running Outlook is a risk, however it really doesn't take that much to remove 99% of the risks. Like I say, don't keep the preview pane open and I view mail as plain text, that should remove the dangers from anything embedded in the HTML, I know better than to open annakornukova.vbs/exe/pif, and I use AVG's antivirus plug-in to catch anything else I may have missed. At this point I think most of the threat is gone. Like I said, this is my first virus in several years.

      I have the feeling it came in on a P2P file. AVG is supposed to scan them too, but I've never really trusted that completely. But those are the risks you take connection to the Internet nowadays. And as long as I can catch it and remove it within 24 hours, I am willing to take the risk.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of human stupidity -RAH
    143. Re:Just run Spybot by maddskillz · · Score: 1

      > Computer experts are widely seen as pasty, overweight, greasy-haired, acne-marked antisocialites

      There is a reason for this stereotype

    144. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      blacklisting known/common spyware sites on your proxy server can work wonders also! there's a million premade lists available for download

    145. Re:Just run Spybot by maddskillz · · Score: 1

      How does this realate to open source? Many of these programs have eula's that the users blindly click through. Even if the source is availble to them, it won't help at all

    146. Re:Just run Spybot by slashdevnull · · Score: 1

      It is possible through Active Directory policy settings to restrict files from being able to execute on Windows PCs within a domain. You can define these "do not run" programs by several means such as file path or even hash rules. This way, even if you're required (by company policy, or whatever) to give users administrative access to their PCs, you can still keep spyware-infected PCs on your domain from running installed spyware code.

      That said, does anyone maintain a public list of install paths and/or hashes for known spyware/malware? I realize that Ad-Aware, Spybot S&D, etc. need to maintain this info internally, but does anyone provide it in an easy-to-import-to-policy format? Even one big, fat text file, or a spreadsheet would be handy.

    147. Re:Just run Spybot by WoodstockJeff · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The evidence supports locking down user machines to doing tasks for work only

      Sometimes, that's impossible. Try to syncronize a Palm Pilot or compatible with Outlook when you're not running as a system adminstrator under XP. It won't work.

      The unfortunate thing is that those people who have PP's are often the ones paying your salary, and they would not be happy with the idea that they might be blocked from updating them.

      Trying to argue security with them is (usually) pointless - they've already made several bad security decisions (Windows servers, Exchange running on those servers, Outlook running on the local machine), so your piddly little concerns with security are unimportant!

    148. Re:Just run Spybot by Chewie · · Score: 1

      Rejected.

      We also would have accepted:

      DELETED!!

      --
      49 20 68 61 76 65 20 74 6F 6F 20 6D 75 63 68 20 66 72 65 65 20 74 69 6D 65 2E
    149. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rejected.

      We also would have accepted:

      DELETED!!


      i thought the correct response was: BAREETED!

    150. Re:Just run Spybot by bizard · · Score: 1
      And it's also worth noting that installing two firewalls like that is paranoid and stupid. Especially if the first one isn't even forwarding ports, something some 90% of computer users don't even need to do.

      Although that is true if you only have one machine, businesses and people with small home networks would be well advised to use both. E-mail worms which infect a single machine and then set up a mail server might then be stopped before infecting the rest of the machines on the network. The days of perimeter only security are gone.

    151. Re:Just run Spybot by festers · · Score: 2, Informative

      Firefox has another great advantage that I see frequently overlooked: AdBlock

      That little extension has made my web browsing pure joy. It blocks every ad I've come across, including flash ads, and it supports wildcards so I can right-click and block entire "ad" directories from servers without losing other content. It's beautiful.

      --


      -------
      "Every artist is a cannibal, every poet is a thief."
    152. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it's also worth noting that installing two firewalls like that is paranoid and stupid.

      When you consider that one of the most popular software firewalls for Windows recently had a major buffer-overflow, I would say the redundancy is more crucial now than ever before.

      A hardware firewall is your best bet for what you put right on the Internet. A software firewall is a good bet for those times when a friend plugs a laptop into your network, or you throw a LAN party. Or, if your hardware firewall has a bug that results in it's pwnge.

      Also, the hardware firewall is the only part of the equation that doesn't cost $0 + your_time. And cleaning your system and/or reformatting after a destructive worm has had its way with you & your network shares is generally worth more than that.

    153. Re:Just run Spybot by rsborg · · Score: 1
      You do get pesky Mac problems though. Like the hardware falling to bits *all* the time.

      Most of your evidence is anecdotal, and could be applied to any manufacturer. For example, I will never buy another Compaq product again.

      I doubt that apple's failure rates are significantly higher than other manufacturers, in fact, according to this thread, Consumer Reports feels they're better than other manufacturers.

      The one point I'll agree with you on is that they are the only hardware shop in town if you want to use their OS and Mac software.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    154. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      JustSomeGuy,

      On parent: I call troll.
      Or, could be he's just an ass :-)
      But I think he's trolling.

      Anyway, very nice post (your original one).

    155. Re:Just run Spybot by Chewie · · Score: 1
      --
      49 20 68 61 76 65 20 74 6F 6F 20 6D 75 63 68 20 66 72 65 65 20 74 69 6D 65 2E
    156. Re:Just run Spybot by zinno · · Score: 1

      i'm doing a fresh install of a win98, for a friend of mine. I wanted to dl s&d, but thanks to u i can't *@#{@ .. CGI slashdotted :/ thx allot pal!

    157. Re:Just run Spybot by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      I think you're probably right, but Lord knows I've heard dumber things from sincere people in the past. :-)

      Thanks for the compliment.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    158. Re:Just run Spybot by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1

      I've found that I usually have to run all 3 (that I know of) spyware removers to be reasonably confident I've got all the latest bugs off: Spybot, Ad-aware & Spysweeper.

      Plus, there's a few damn pieces of malware (irritatingly named variations of "*.BetterInternet") which uses a few tricks to make themselves unremoveable even after booting into safe mode - you have to use a boot disk to get rid of the randomly-named DLL files which keep it on the system (the sweeper programs can usually tell you what those random names are). Even more obnoxiously, the BetterInternet variants keep downloading & installing OTHER spy/adware packages, so until you get rid of it, you'll always have a system riddled with malware.

      Let's just say that if I were a detective responsible for finding out who murdered the developers of that damn package, the case would probably never get solved.

    159. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And when I think of "big computer", I actually think of... say... an E15K and up. ;) I think you mean an F15K, there were only E10K's, once Sun went to the 15000, they started using F15K.

    160. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure it would. Set up your DHCP server to force those machines to go through the firewall to reach any other machine on the network and filter unwanted traffic (possibly all traffic if there is no need for the workstations to talk to each other). We probably aren't talking about a lot of machines here so the network wouldn't be brought to its knees by this action, either.

    161. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The hardware firewall protects your computers from the outside and if the software firewall is disabled or circumvented. The software firewall protects your computers from the outside and to a lesser degree your internal computers.

    162. Re:Just run Spybot by nlindstrom · · Score: 1
      http://www.spybot.info. That's all it takes.
      And Ad-Aware (http://download.com.com/3000-8022-10214379.html). Neither program will catch 100% of spyware, but by using both, you can be reasonably certain that you've caught most of the spyware.
    163. Re:Just run Spybot by gumbo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It would be nice if people could comprehend that just because you can write code and support enterprise networks doesn't mean you know every obscure thing in the world.

      The funniest bit is all the people that you do wind up helping. At least with me, they always ask me stuff I have no idea about. "How do I do this in Excel?" or "why does it keep doing that?" So I click around for a bit and fix it for them, and they assume it's something that all geeks learned how to do in geek school. Like, day 41 of geek school is how to change the header options in Word. But really, they're just too scared to go clicking on new and weird menus that they've never clicked on before, so they don't even try.

    164. Re:Just run Spybot by ranchdudes · · Score: 1

      He meant you are missing carriage returns. That's why the period in his sentence is on the next line. What you are missing is in between the word "are" and the period. Doh!

    165. Re:Just run Spybot by Spoing · · Score: 1
      1. Sure it would. Set up your DHCP server to force those machines to go through the firewall to reach any other machine on the network and filter unwanted traffic (possibly all traffic if there is no need for the workstations to talk to each other). We probably aren't talking about a lot of machines here so the network wouldn't be brought to its knees by this action, either.

      Would help. Would not solve the problem. Any spyware that 'looks' like normal traffic will get through the proxy fine. If you have a black list of bad sites, you have to keep that list up to date. This tactic doesn't work for spam very well, so I'd expect the same results.

      Block it at the true source; prevent the software from running and being installed in the first place and it can't call home or do anything.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    166. Re:Just run Spybot by Spoing · · Score: 1
      1. That may be, but a proxy filter will. If they can't access the sites that have the crap, there will be no crap.

      Proxy server, and a firewall, can help. They aren't solutions though.

      In each case, you're fighting each and every spyware program out there that wants to call home. The list of places can be substantial and constantly changing. It's like another anti-spam war *unless* you can prevent the spyware from running in the first place. That means preventing easy installation of software. That means locking down the machines.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    167. Re:Just run Spybot by oiarbovnb · · Score: 1

      ahhh...very good, very good...didn't see the "." before...

    168. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All that crap.. doesn't solve the problem you face when one person has "manually" configured your "windoze" box and it pukes or asks for user input when installing spybot... Or when five hundred of them puke because somebody added something else.. which in turn got removed by spybot which in turn breaks IE which in turn stops the Nurse from getting to the intranet which in turn stops her from ordering this or that.. which means I get yelled at. ;)

    169. Re:Just run Spybot by Seumas · · Score: 1

      I gave up on everyone in my family always asking me "what do you do again?" - especially when they are talking to friends and distant family members about me.

      Occasionally, I just invent something out of thin air. They never know the difference. Tell them you write software for communications systems for NASA that they use in the space shuttles. Whatever amuses you.

    170. Re:Just run Spybot by Seumas · · Score: 1

      "I can't find this one option I used before in Outlook one time.. You know, with that little button that looks like this one thing and blah blah blah.. Can you tell me what that was?" ...uh... No. Sorry - I haven't ever used Outlook. I don't know what to tell you. Did you try F1? Did you try reading the documentation? Did you google it? Did you ask this question on some online tech help sites?

      Actually, that is a good solution, too. Find some decent online forums for newbies where they will be treated well and they can ask for help there. That should reduce the load on their favorite real-life techie a bit.

      Some people have the impression that techies are lazy. They think this because they mention a computer problem to us, expecting us to jump up and immediately come over and fix it for them. But we deal with tech stuff for a living, as our hobby often, and for everyone we know. We get burned out and sometimes would rather just not deal with it. Hence, your simple request to "see why my computer is so slow" goes weeks or months before we get around to checking it out for you.

      It isn't so much that we don't care as it is that... well, we're tired.

    171. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Evidentally, you haven't thought of telling your PHBs that they need to switch to linux for at least your mission critical boxes...you're depending on windows boxes and you are complaining about the lines going down?! Migrate to linux TODAY and your PHBs will be amazed by the sudden reliability of their systems. Demand a pay raise both before and after you do the migration. :-)

    172. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point of a hardware firewall AND a software firewall is this: a hardware firewall protects you from what's coming in (uninvited) from the outside, while the software firewall prevents applications (spyware) from "phoning home."

    173. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Opera is by far the best, smallest, and fastest browser. The quick settings for pop-ip and cookies rule. The Mouse Gestures rule and add to the one handed browsing goodness. Best of all its fricken TINY!

    174. Re:Just run Spybot by aardwolf204 · · Score: 1

      When chicks I meet at parties or clubs/bars ask me what I do I tell them I'm a network administrator and basicly it means i goof off at home and get paid a lot of money. then i say its really boring stuff and im way more interested in hearing about you. 1. "network administrator" sounds 'hi-tech', and 2. they just wanted to know if you made good money or not. now go buy them a drink.

      --
      Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
    175. Re:Just run Spybot by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      This seems to be amazingly variable. I own a TiBook bought in December of 2002 and it's been remarkably trouble-free. The only hardware problem I had was a latch that sometimes doesn't catch. I could have sent it back under warranty, but in all honesty I didn't want to take the time, so I've lived with it and all is fine. It seems to have actually fixed itself. In software problems, I had to reload the OS once, but all my data survived the misadventure just fine.

      I also have a G5/2ghz dual processor, which replaced a dual G4/450, and both systems have performed flawlessly over the years.

      Guess it all depends on some combination of how you treat your machines and random luck. I bought all of my machines shortly after their introduction, so that isn't even a factor.

      D

    176. Re:Just run Spybot by atta1 · · Score: 1

      Well, that works real well unless your friends/neighbors happen to know that you work for a relatively well known company that happens to sell those Windows boxes that people have in their houses. Then they tend to be a little less believing when you say you can't fix them, and they look at you funny if you tell them to buy a Mac.

      --
      "The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote" -- Kosh
    177. Re:Just run Spybot by Dog135 · · Score: 1

      At work, if I'm not browsing my usual sites, I startup with Knoppix with only one FAT partition mounted. Hack me all you want! They'll never touch my system!

      --
      "That's so plausible, I can't believe it!" - Leela
    178. Re:Just run Spybot by michrech · · Score: 1

      That's why you create a white list of sites they are allowed to visit, instead of blocking what they can't.

      I know this won't work in every situation, but there have been multiple examples posted in this thread alone where this is a perfect idea.

      --
      bork bork bork!
    179. Re:Just run Spybot by efflux · · Score: 1
      The use of little, given that it doesn't correspond with size, implies that the Mac is inherently "less" than any other PC -- something that's been argued ad infinitum for sure, but I think most people here would agree that the Mac eclipses Windows and Linux in many ways. In this specific context, the use of the word "little" seems to only be used to state that the user isn't good enough for Windows or Linux.

      That's pretty condescending.

      Ok, I'll bite.

      I agree that the phrase is condescending, but for different reasons. I do not think the phrase: "nice little Macintosh computer" is not being used to say that the computer is in any way actually "little" or "less". 'Little' as used here is a diminuitive, as in: "my little darling". The problem is, is that 'little' is a charged word, and without proper context the listener might not understand the sense it is being used in--they may find it to be ironic. Thus the phrase may come off as demeaning to the listener, as in, "hey, how do you not know about this computer?" For example:
      A: "Where do I file my taxes?"
      B: "There is this *little* department called the IRS. You should check it out."
      Here the usage of the word "little" is feigned humility. It is meant to draw ironic contrast to the ubiquity of the entity in question. This is how I beleive that phrase would likely be interpreted.

      Though I imagine someone could take your slant as well.

      --
      Do I contradict myself? Very well, then I contradict myself, I am large, I contain multitudes. -- Walt Whitman
    180. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. You're an idiot.

    181. Re:Just run Spybot by Syrrh · · Score: 1

      Opera was nice, but after version 7 it just seemed to lose the attraction, mostly because they STILL couldn't get java working right.

      I use Avant, and it behaves very nicely. Pages are rendered by IE, but has good anti-popup/java/flash/activex/etc controls, and its tabbing is right on par with Opera (BOOO, Mozilla!). Has gestures too, but I don't use them so I don't know how good they are.

    182. Re:Just run Spybot by Spoing · · Score: 1
      That'll work in two situations; your kids at home and if your boss says it's OK at work. A white list that is used for a little while and then disabled because of complaints puts you right back making the same decision;

      Constantly update a black list of forbidden sites.

      Make a one-time change and disable the ability for the software to be installed on the client.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    183. Re:Just run Spybot by rackman · · Score: 1

      I work for a company running over 50,000 desktops worldwide. Spyware is becoming a problem but we seem to be getting it under control with Spybot. We are working on a plan to automate running it with SMS once a week. From what the lab is telling field support technicians the automation testing is looking pretty good with spybot

    184. Re:Just run Spybot by twoshortplanks · · Score: 1
      It certainly seems more than chance. It seems that everyone I know has problems with them. Of course, the way probability works we could just be that one statistical blip. Someone has to be.

      Of course, the IBM I had before my Mac failed three times (two screen faults, one dead hdd.) So it's fair to say that other manufacturers have problems too. But the number of macs I've seen shipped to people that were broken on arrival scares me - it's not just that I mistreat the machines.

      Bah. My advice: Buy apple, but accept it's quite likely to fail, and put up the cash for Applecare if you know what's good for you.

      --
      -- Sorry, I can't think of anything funny to say here.
    185. Re:Just run Spybot by rackman · · Score: 1

      I do agree that some spyware will not install unless you have administrative rights. Others however give a damn less about who you are or what you account you are logged on with. We have our users locked down with GPO's and some have local policies on the machine on top of that. They still seem to catch one every now and then. One of my favorites would happen to be hijack this browser. I cannot tell you how many admins(READ: Secretaries) with no right to even install a printer locally have this program magically appear. Stolen SIG: Slashdot V. Google C'mon you geeks! Take off those pocket protectors and put on the gloves! Google's callin' you out!

    186. Re:Just run Spybot by paj1234 · · Score: 1

      Children's toys have to pass rigorous safety tests before they are allowed to be sold. For examples, see:

      http://www.bsi-global.com/Education/Education+Pu bl ications/ChildcareleafletIssue3.pdf

      Giving your 'toddlers' Microsoft Windows to play with is like giving them lead-painted toys with easily found sharp bits inside.

    187. Re:Just run Spybot by j3ll0 · · Score: 0

      Where I work, a stopped line is worth AU$2M a day.

      The way we got around this is simply to isolate that VLAN at the router. The line machines only need to talk to the SQL DB and the AS/400. Only allow the machines to talk to those two IPs.

      If you really want to have some fun with this, you can block it at the port level as well

      MS have some really good webcasts on this subject at MS

    188. Re:Just run Spybot by HermanZA · · Score: 1

      Well, yes, absolutely, you don't have to do *anything* to get spyware with IE. MS is so nice as to include Alexa with it for free. The result is that everybloody time I update IE, I have to run Adaware to remove Alexa - thanks Microsoft!

    189. Re:Just run Spybot by AndyChrist · · Score: 1

      Running Mozilla makes *MY* box (just about) invincible...at least in this regard. Doesn't do jack for boxes that other people use.

      PEBCAK.

    190. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I.E. is faster, and renders things better than Firefox

      Obviously you never do webdesign. IE's css support is crap. (well ok, it's better than ns4, but that's dead.) The only reason it renders things better is that it's got a 90+% marketshare, so everybody makes sure that stuff renders well in IE.

    191. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two, ever hear of the "Force quit" menu/keystroke that brings up an application manager and lets you choose the task to kill? Rejected.

      Heard of multiple users and fast user switching? Or don't you use Panther? Situation:

      User1 uses any Classic app, walks away, machine falls asleep. User2 walks up to the machine, enters password (machine is set to lock on sleep), switches to their account, tries to run different Classic app. App won't run because Classic environment process is owned by User1 and MacOS doesn't support multiple instances of Classic. User2 goes into Apple -> System Prefs -> Classic, but since User2 isn't running Classic, User2 can't shut down Classic! User2 also tries Apple -> Force Quit, but again, User2 cannot see User1's applications, including Classic. User1 has left the building while logged in, and User2 urgently needs to use a Classic app. User2 goes into terminal, does ps xa, finds Classic environment process, sudo kill -9's Classic environment, runs app.

      Rejected. Dumbass. Condescending prick. (Hell yeah, I'm stooping.)

      I'd go through the rest, but I don't have enough time. Yeah, an iMac is technically smaller than the average PC, I'll give you that, bad phrasing on my part. Still not "little."

    192. Re:Just run Spybot by dustmite · · Score: 1

      Well I suppose YMMV as they say, but sheesh, in my experience, no way in hell is IE faster than Mozilla/Firefox. For at least several years and IE versions now I can say for sure that IE is noticably much slower than Firefox (to load, and to autocomplete URLs, and to open new windows, and to open new tabs, and to load pages, and to render and display the pages). IE also has annoying problems that make you make much longer to view the page like waiting for an entire table to download before showing any of the table.

      It's true though that Moz/Firefox seem to use more RAM than IE to display the same page. That usually doesn't bother me except when viewing large documents like the PHP manual.

    193. Re:Just run Spybot by berzerke · · Score: 1

      ...If they're not locked down, then the problem is with the admin, not the software...

      In a perfect world, maybe. But, politics can make lockdowns rather difficult without hitting the unemployment line. Management doesn't always listen. Then think about when the lockdowns break some "critical" (probably poorly written) piece of software...

    194. Re:Just run Spybot by BuckaBooBob · · Score: 1

      Well youshould be running your own caching DNS server anyway.. Just start to add in black holes for sites that push Spyware/Adware.. That helps soo much in the long run... and if you keep your eyes on what your doing there is near 0 impact on net access.. and if you do your list right and include alot of banner sites you will drop your over all bandwidth useage/cost if your metered.

      --
      Who needs WiFi when we can have Packet Over Sheep! http://datacomm.org/PoS-InternetDraft.txt
    195. Re:Just run Spybot by BuckaBooBob · · Score: 1

      Boxen like those... Should be opn thier own network with restricted access.. Heavily restricted access.. Earn your money the easy way.. Put your foot down and say NO.. That will just cause problems... and when it does and your on lunch.. Tell em.. I told you so... I'll get up from my lunch to fix it... But Its gonna get fixed properly or I am gonna finish eating my lunch and get to it later. :)

      --
      Who needs WiFi when we can have Packet Over Sheep! http://datacomm.org/PoS-InternetDraft.txt
    196. Re:Just run Spybot by chainsaw1 · · Score: 1

      I agree, AdBlock is a godsend. Someone has come up with flash ads that don't popup the AdBlock tab, but I can still find them when I do the 'list all blockable elements'. I also love that it'll take out iFrames buried in other iFrames.

      Mozilla AdBlock may also be found at adblock.mozdev.org

      --
      - Sig
    197. Re:Just run Spybot by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      I know I'm being trolled again, but...

      User1 uses any Classic app, walks away, machine falls asleep.

      Let's try the variation as I already explained it:

      User1 doesn't use any Classic app because no such animal is installed on the machine at hand. End of situation.

      You can contrive any horrible scenario you want ("User1 sets the machine on fire, but the key to the fire extinguisher is in his Apple Keyring and he's locked it."), but that only proves that you can contrive horrible scenarios.

      Yeah, an iMac is technically smaller than the average PC

      I'm beginning to thing that you've never seen one, because noone who has can possibly say it's only "technically smaller" but not "little".

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    198. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I guess that's probably a pretty effective filter, if you're interested primarily in chicks who want a guy who thinks his work is boring, and believes they only want to know if he makes good money.

      I guess it takes all kinds.

    199. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A Production line machine doesn't need to be on a network? How on earth does it get its data? A production line machine shouldn't be using windows? So how do you get the manufacturer's application to run in linux when it is connected through a custom hardware interface?

      Some of these things are headless PCs pretending to be embedded hardware.

    200. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Money IS all women care about.

    201. Re:Just run Spybot by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Oh - by the way.

      I recently took the liberty of building my own 'SecurityCD' that I distribute to friends and family. It has an html file in it with detailed instructions and screenshots for installing every application I provide on the CD. I've only given it to two people, but I found that they appreciated the CD and it allowed them to do most of what I would normally be doing for them with minimal trouble.

      On the CD, I put AdAware, Spybot, Thunderbird, Firefox and ZoneAlarm. Then I couple it with a copy of OpenCD 1.2 (going to start giving out OpenCD 1.4 now). It took a lot of time to write the documentation for them, but in the two cases I've dealt with so far, my involvement was very brief; nothing more than "Here, use this first CD to secure your system. Follow the instructions in the README.html" and then "When you're done, check out that other CD. It contains open source, free applications to replace almost all of your expensive Microsoft garbage".

      They're surprised that they can get so much for free - from the firewall and adaware program to openoffice, 7zip, filezilla...

      I think more geeks need to take the time to develop something like this. It takes a lot of time at first, but you will reap the full returns the first time or two you are able to respond to a call for help by whipping out two CDs for them while you go back to playing Unreal Tournament 2004. :)

    202. Re:Just run Spybot by ashayh · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering what ACL you've setup.. At my Univ, the cumputers are totally locked down. I cant install usefull stuff like Winrar, 7zip, Java SDk.. Hell, you cant access display preperties, see the printers installed.
      But you wont believe the amount of spyware and viruses our network has.
      Their solution is to quickly reinstall from custom image CD's. Which also means all your settings are gone for that PC.
      Thankfully, they've been having Firefox on their reinstall images for the past few months.

    203. Re:Just run Spybot by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      Just tell people that using IE means funding terrorists and being un patriotic.

      Please someone out there, make a worm that downloads FIREFOX and installs it over iexplore.exe

      It would be most funny and the 'good guys' would just ignore it and not patch against it :)

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    204. Re:Just run Spybot by xandroid · · Score: 1

      Even better -- AdBlock understands regular expressions. I have only nine entries, and I rarely see any ads.

      --
      $ echo "ceci n'est pas une pipe" | sed -Ee 's/(eci n|pas )//g'
    205. Re:Just run Spybot by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      it just goes to show you that a billion dollars and 70 product managers and a team of marketing and QA drones cant OUT DO one guy working in his bedroom with dedication.

      Does MS care? no. Does MS have a clue? No

      Lets hope theres some class action suit when a hospital goes down and 7 kids die bacuse of IE bugs and spy ware stuffing up medical orders and patients dosage/history info.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    206. Re:Just run Spybot by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      My point was that AVG isn't all that it's cracked up to be. I hope in future versions that they've implemented a small confirmation dialog before you could potentially hose your entire machine.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    207. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello? hardware and software firewalls is not paranoid or stupid - its common sense. Software firewalls are not great - here's a clue why: Windows brings up the TCP/IP stack BEFORE servies or applications - in other words (if u are on a LAN or always up link) you are vulnerable until a few seconds after *log on* has completed.

    208. Re:Just run Spybot by masoncooper · · Score: 1

      I guess you could say we have our systems pretty locked down, but we try and give the users everything they could ever need so they don't have to be trusted with making the right decision of which program to download. Additionally, if there IS some program we need to install, we can push the app in the background so most of the time, there's no need for them to even log out.
      I know this is quite a bit of hand holding, but our business function doesn't require very many custom configurations and we've managed to reduce the majority of our service calls to application support, where we just have to show them how to do things.

      We watch our systems through close auditing which runs once a day on the first login of that machine. We receive notification if a new executable or activex component shows up. We have yet to see any unauthorized changes but don't plan on letting our guard down anytime soon.

    209. Re:Just run Spybot by ratsnapple+tea · · Score: 1

      Agreed... and let me just add, I think another factor is that people have really high expectations of Apple, so they're more inclined to ask for repairs when tiny things go wrong with their Macs.

      My friend never gave a crap that her old Toshiba had a wobbly CD drive and speakers that didn't work, but now that she has an iBook, she laments the loss of one of the small rubber feet (which I think she can get replaced free of charge at an Apple store, by the way) and complains about how the shiny cover's getting all scratched up from being in her bag. Actually, she jokes about how ridiculous it is that she cares so much about the condition of her iBook. I'm pretty sure her old Toshiba inspired nothing but loathing, by contrast.

      I guess my point is that Apple users demand more from their machines, so they make more noise about minor things going wrong.

      Or maybe I've been inhaling too much secondhand crack. Who knows.

    210. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      http://www.spybot.info . That's all it takes.

      Hardly.

      Spybot hasn't been updated in signatures since the beginning of MARCH. Would you trust anti-virus software that hadn't been updated in two months?

    211. Re:Just run Spybot by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      And why are critical systems running an insecure OS with a long colourful history of security vulnerabilities?

      Because it only has a "long colourful history" in places it's been adminned by incompetents.

      In fact any machine that doesn't need to be connected to a network shouldn't be.

      That's a pretty short list these days.

    212. Re:Just run Spybot by denverradiosucks · · Score: 1

      From working at a local computer store here in Denver, I have learned one thing over the hundreds of computers I have worked on; whatever you do don't install a software firewall, especially Zone Alarm! First of all, its a resource HOG! Secondly, ZA has problems with buffer overflows which we know hackers exploit all the time, an major issue with software firewalls (Duh, it's software based! Google "Zone Alarm" buffer overflow and you'll see what I am talking about). A software firewall combined with a hardware firewall is overkill! Who wants to configure grandma's ports on her home network? Also, who wants those retarded messages saying something is intruding? They are as annoying as popups! 99% of computer users freak out because they don't know what the heck TCP/UDP ports are and how they work. So they call us expecting us to explain in 5 minutes what I spent months learning about in school. It's utter crap. Besides, a firewall DOES NOT PREVENT SPYWARE! When I used windows, I would just use mozilla or firefox and I would never have problems with spyware. I would scan once a month and get a few cookies, that's it!

      Lastly, Ad aware or spybot does not get rid of hijacked web browsers. hijack this works like a dream. It's great because I can use it on a windows 2k box and remove startup stuff without copying an msconfig.exe from an XP box into it, and customers who tinker around with their computers won't accidentally re-enable those stupid programs again.

    213. Re:Just run Spybot by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, yeah, IMO, it should have similar sandbox restrictions as Java has/had running on remote websites... to counter this, ActiveX is *VERY* usefull for intranet/extranet development, and IE can/could be configured to only allow this on "approved"/trusted sites.. but it wasn't that way by default, and there are a lot of holes... hdd access being one of them... plus the installers can do nasty stuff, if the user clicks "yes" ...

      it is and was a usefull technology for *many* things, unfortunately, it wasn't secure enough at the start.. and the "local" security restriction for email in OE was a joke to begin with... I use windows scripting for a lot, and it is very usefull, but in *EMAIL*?!?!?! wtf were they thinking.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    214. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think I.E. is faster, and renders things better than Firefox,
      Presumably Firefox doesn't render PNGs at all, then?
    215. Re:Just run Spybot by DougMelvin · · Score: 1

      That's easy.. to block the path the virus's use to enter you rcomputer just follow these 4 easy steps:
      1) unplug your computer from the internet
      2) remove and discard your network card (or modem)
      3) remove and discard your floppy drive
      4) remove and discard your CD rom

      And presto: your computer is now immune to viral infection

      --
      Reality is in the mind of the beholder - me 1996
    216. Re:Just run Spybot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those of us sat above our big computers, who don't want people to think we mean "FreeBSD server over in the machine closet" when we say big computer?

  2. ad-aware by frizz · · Score: 4, Informative

    Is there anything better than ad-aware for solving this problem?

    1. Re:ad-aware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Linux :-)

    2. Re:ad-aware by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 4, Informative

      Is there anything better than ad-aware for solving this problem?

      Why, yes, as it happens! ;)

      I've read some suggestions to run both Adaware and Spybot - I've found either to be more than capable on their own, but then I tend to practice "safe-browsing": use Firefox, use Linux where possible, etc.

      --
      This is where the serious fun begins.
    3. Re:ad-aware by UconnGuy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Spybot is just as good. I find running them both is a better solution, each find things the other doesn't.

    4. Re:ad-aware by cemaco · · Score: 1

      Ad-aware is a good tool but not infallible. My wife's system had about 6 different Trojans and mallware on it. Ad-aware only detected 1. I knew there must be others because the firewall kept detecting something trying to call out. It took 4 different antivirus and spy-ware detection tools to find them all and I still worry about something being missed.

    5. Re:ad-aware by saudadelinux · · Score: 1

      I was battling ad/spyware by hand the other week, then downloaded a demo copy here at work, on recommendation from a buddy.

      I was amazed at how much crap (about 6 - 8 processes and about 5 -8 objects, a few Registry keys and dozens of other files)had gotten onto my system (128 MB RAM 700 Mhz PIII XP box - I'm a Fed). The machine seemed to run about 30% faster after Ad-aware full-cavity searched out the schmutz.

      I'd heartily recommend Ad-aware to anyone. If Spybot's better, that's gotta be a heckuva product.

      --
      I didn't think the house band in Hell would play this badly.
    6. Re:ad-aware by NatasRevol · · Score: 2, Funny

      wife...mall-ware...

      Joke in there somewhere!

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    7. Re:ad-aware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah? Firefox? That's still too risky. Use lynx!

    8. Re:ad-aware by satterth · · Score: 1
      I question Ad-Aware now. And here is why.

      Ad-aware 6.0 with reference file dated 03.05.2004 has detected Internet Explorer with a BLANK home page setting as a possible browser hijack attempt.

      I'm not impressed anymore.

      --
      Being called a dork on Slashdot must be like being called the retard in special ed.
    9. Re:ad-aware by Alyred · · Score: 1
      Uhmm, why would this absolutely NOT be a hijack attempt?

      All Ad-Aware sees is something strange in the homepage field. So it's alerting you that something is odd about it, it's not blowing up or claiming false shit on your system.

      If you set it that way, ignore that message. If you DIDN'T.... well, then maybe there's a problem, right?

  3. No Suprise by two_stripe · · Score: 2, Redundant

    Spyware can be a real prick to remove, people just cant do it themselves, even competent computer users.

    1. Re:No Suprise by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

      Spyware can be a real prick to remove, people just cant do it themselves, even competent computer users.

      Sure you can: FORMAT C: /X

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:No Suprise by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 1

      Spyware can be a real prick to remove, people just cant do it themselves, even competent computer users.

      Often you have to pull off special tricks, like creating a dummy file to prevent reinstallation by conspirator spyware programs. Man I hate those programs.

      --

      Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
  4. i know.... by zarniwhoop · · Score: 0, Insightful

    how about NOT installing shit on your systems duh?

    1. Re:i know.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Except for the fact that the average user leaves their IE at default settings. Even savvy users can be fooled - for example - my wife's computer was recently infected with the sysupd.exe/TSCash dialer spyware - it installed itself, without my wife's knowledge or consent, even though I set her IE settings as secure as possible. In order to remove this - I had to boot into safe mode, delete the sysupd.exe file, and then remove two registry settings. Of course - the question remains - the bits of info telling the OS to write those registry entries and run that exe are *still* floating around the hard drive somewhere, even though inactive.

      You can't blame every dumb user for spyware that installs itself via malicious Java or VB code - most of the time, the user will be completely unaware and unable to do anything about it until after the fact.

    2. Re:i know.... by supergiovane · · Score: 1
      how about NOT installing shit on your systems duh?

      I tried to do it, but I need it for my games. When Linux will support Colin McRae 4 and Need 4 Speed maybe ... uh ...now I notice ... were you talking about ... uhm ... spyware? Oh, nevermind. I need some sleep.

      --
      Signatures are for stupids.
    3. Re:i know.... by JavaLord · · Score: 2, Insightful

      how about NOT installing shit on your systems duh?

      The new trend I've noticed is if you end up on a website with one of those stupid pop ups that gives you "Do you want to install junkWebBar" you click no, and it still tries to install (my firewall catches this). It still manages to install itself though, my firewall ends up catching it when it tries to get out for the first time.

      You can try running mozilla but then you run into websites that just break in it because they aren't coded for web standards.

      Now this stuff happens to me, I have a degree in computer science, work as a programmer, and run 2 firewalls at home. How are everyday users going to protect themselves? Just not "installing shit" doesnt' save someone from getting browser jacked which used to be limited to porn sites, but I see it everywhere nowadays.

      This is going to be an issue, that if it gets worse might drive people to linux or some other OS/internet browser.

    4. Re:i know.... by wheany · · Score: 2, Informative

      Use Mozilla until you run into a page that doesn't work. Then copy the address, open IE and use it while on that page. That's what I do with Opera. And really, there aren't that many pages that simply refuse to work with anything but IE.

    5. Re:i know.... by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      You can't blame every dumb user for spyware that installs itself via malicious Java or VB code - most of the time, the user will be completely unaware and unable to do anything about it until after the fact.

      The blame goes to whoever decided to install an OS that allows this.

      Live & learn...until you get the second part, your life will be hell.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    6. Re:i know.... by JavaLord · · Score: 1

      Use Mozilla until you run into a page that doesn't work. Then copy the address, open IE and use it while on that page. That's what I do with Opera. And really, there aren't that many pages that simply refuse to work with anything but IE.

      that is exactly what I do. I do run into a lot of webpages that don't display correctly in mozilla (about 15% if I had to guess) and certain ones flat out break (probably about 3%). But how broken is your OS/platform if you have to switch between two different browsers to surf the internet safely? Lets face it, aside from office, the internet is the "killer app" for the everyday user.

    7. Re:i know.... by mwood · · Score: 1

      I usually figure that if some site can't be bothered to write actual HTML then they probably don't have anything worth reading anyway. Byebye, I'll shop somewhere else.

    8. Re:i know.... by wheany · · Score: 1

      I guess we surf different parts of the web then, since I haven't had to use IE for weeks.

    9. Re:i know.... by wheany · · Score: 1

      My procedure if the site doesn't work is this:
      1) Put referrer logging on
      test
      2) Disable Privoxy
      test
      3) Tell Opera to fake its user-agent string as IE (and emulate some IE-specific javascript functionality).
      test

      If nothing works, I try IE.

  5. my experience... by Ummagumma · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Im the IT manager for a 100+ person software compandy (actually, the ONLY IT person...)

    Over the last 6 months, I've had to spend more and more time cleaning this crap off peoples machines. I've got it down to a science, though - I keep a disk around with a whole lot of useful tools on it such as:

    Spybot search and destroy
    stinger
    all windows XP / 2000 patches since the latest SP
    spywareblaster
    and others

    Takes me about 15 minutes to clean a machine now. Of course, that is 15 minutes that I could be doing something USEFUL...

    --
    "The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:my experience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not much of a manger not knowing about SMS and not having someone else doing the work or firing the people for wasting production time playing with software instead of doing their intended task.

    2. Re:my experience... by GypC · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yet you still use Windows...

      You probably don't have much of a choice, but I would encourage you to look into a Linux migration.

    3. Re:my experience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im the IT manager for a 100+ person software compandy (actually, the ONLY IT person...)

      100 person SOFTWARE company and you're the only IT guy?

      Isn't software IT? So there are 99 managers and sales guys?

    4. Re:my experience... by GypC · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh yeah... and why do your users have the security privileges to install software?

    5. Re:my experience... by grub · · Score: 5, Interesting


      I'm [network/unix/Mac/Novell/some windows] support for a ~200 user research place. Every Friday our Director of Research sends out a "what's up" email talking about various projects, etc. A couple of years ago I was asked to do a weekly thing called "Computer Corner". What I do is have a paragraph with a link to an internal webserver I run with more info.

      I did a spyware article a while back and on the server had some tools for installation complete with how-to's, screenshots, etc. Naturally some people aren't geeks and are a bit leery of anything remotely technical so we always offer to come do the work if needed. That happened only a handful of times.

      If you have a lot of users that approach may be helpful.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    6. Re:my experience... by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yet you still use Windows...

      You probably don't have much of a choice, but I would encourage you to look into a Linux migration.


      You forget Dealing With Your Boss 101: If Windows causes your pains and trouble, bitch and whine about Microsoft to your boss, he'll "understand" but won't even question your IT choices for the company. If you chose Linux, any little problem, however insignificant, will be Linux' fault, i.e. your fault.

      Choosing Windows is a job security choice. Sad but very true...

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    7. Re:my experience... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2, Funny
      Takes me about 15 minutes to clean a machine now. Of course, that is 15 minutes that I could be doing something USEFUL...
      Two words, buddy: JOB SECURITY.
    8. Re:my experience... by jamonterrell · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's interesting. I usually stick with ad-aware, but decided to evaluate some other products for use at work. Within 2 minutes of installation (The first time I ran IE afterwards), I had a popup from gator come straight up. I'm not saying without a doubt that spywareblaster contains gator from the original source, but the copy I got my hands on snuck gator in. Anyone else seen this? Did you download your copy direct or from a download mirror? (Also interesting to note is that spywareblaster, as of the last version I saw, did not detect gator as spyware.)

      --
      I can count to 1023 on my hands. Ask me about #132.
    9. Re:my experience... by SilentChris · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Permissions are your friend. We have a similar situation but we knew long ago that limited permissions was best for most users. They can download all the crap they want -- they just can't install it. Same goes for viruses. We haven't had a single virus or spyware problem since we instituted the policy.

    10. Re:my experience... by Mr.+McGibby · · Score: 1

      Probably because they're a software company. Probably lots of developers (who should know better, but...) who need to have admin rights to their machines.

      --
      Mad Software: Rantings on Developing So
    11. Re:my experience... by syn3rg · · Score: 1

      He is "IT manager for a 100+ person" software company network. SMS server w/ 100 lic = $6022 not counting the hardware (another $4000). The beancounters will never approve the purchase when he can just go around and install the software -- this ain't the late '90s when every software company was wallowing in VC. That $10K is probably half his annual IT budget.

      --
      The contents of this message have been doubly encrypted by ROT13
    12. Re:my experience... by RollingThunder · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Probably because so many piss-poor programmers assume they'll have that ability, and the apps your users need won't work if they don't have that priviledge?

    13. Re:my experience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      >Takes me about 15 minutes to clean a machine now. Of course, that is 15 minutes that I could be doing something USEFUL...


      like posting on /. ? :P

      isn't it part of your job to keep those machines clean if you are the only IT person?

    14. Re:my experience... by azzy · · Score: 1

      Maybe he works for SCO?

    15. Re:my experience... by Ummagumma · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I do use windows, and have zero choice in the matter. Our software is written primarily for Windows Server, and .NET development doesn't generally work very well on a Linux box.

      If I had my choice, Id have Linux deployed alot more in the backend, but I don't have that luxury. The company is WAY to tied into Exchange and MSCRM to go with a Linux solution.

      I AM however, putting SpamAssassin on a Linux box to do mail filtering. :)

      --
      "The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." - Thomas Jefferson
    16. Re:my experience... by Ummagumma · · Score: 1

      Very good idea - I'll definately try this one ASAP. Just have to find the time to shoehorn it in :)

      --
      "The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." - Thomas Jefferson
    17. Re:my experience... by hattig · · Score: 5, Informative

      A lot of "Spyware Removal" software is actually Spyware that removes competing spyware.

      The only two to trust are AdAware and Spybot.

      Unfortunately the Spybot download doesn't work at the moment, I think it's slashdotted.

    18. Re:my experience... by gordonb · · Score: 1

      You know, this is so friggin' true. One of my pet peeves at work is that many programs can't be installed on w2k by the user and require either admin login or that damned "Run As" security hole. You just know that these programs can then screw with system at a higher permission level with (often) time-consuming results. Locking down the registry and system files is harder than it looks.

    19. Re:my experience... by Ummagumma · · Score: 1

      I use spyware blaster as an addition to Spybot - I install it afterwards. I haven't noticed the Gator issue, but I'll definately take a look at that ASAP.

      I'll be PISSED if Gator ships with it...

      --
      "The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." - Thomas Jefferson
    20. Re:my experience... by grub · · Score: 2, Funny


      Yeah, do it. You'll have way more time to read slashdot! ;)

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    21. Re:my experience... by jamonterrell · · Score: 1

      Post back with what you find. My guess is that I got it from a source that had hacked up the exe to install gator, but you never know. At the very least I'd recommend that people only download it directly from their website at www.javacoolsoftware.com.

      --
      I can count to 1023 on my hands. Ask me about #132.
    22. Re:my experience... by TykeClone · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I AM however, putting SpamAssassin on a Linux box to do mail filtering. :)

      We do this. The only other things I would recommend would be to tie them in with MimeDefang and ClamAV. Doing that lets you bounce e-mail bourne viruses before they make it into the internal network.

      One day last month 1/3 of all of our inbound e-mail traffic was e-mail attempting to deliver viruses. They never got to the user's desk, so they never became a security problem.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    23. Re:my experience... by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      Each time I clean up someone's machine (after hours for $), I give out a 5 page script with screenshots on how to run AdAware, check for windows updates, and check to make sure Norton is working properly. I hand them that, and then the bill, and tell them that following these steps weekly will save them another call.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    24. Re:my experience... by Rayder · · Score: 1

      I administer, for one of my customers, a small 10 computer office with lots of malware in his computers, and my solution for him has been to install Linux, Win4Lin over Linux with win98, that remounts itself from clean state every times the user logs in the xdm session manager, and when a virus, spyware, whateverware thing happens, the user just must restart his windows session to get a new, clean and working copy of his setup. It's a dommage that win4lin can only run win 9x/Me, but if you can live with it, your life becomes easier.

    25. Re:my experience... by Ummagumma · · Score: 1

      Bingo!

      --
      "The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." - Thomas Jefferson
    26. Re:my experience... by haut · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I work in support for a ~400 user system of mostly Windows users. All that are on 2000/XP have limited rights and can't install anything. We don't get spyware on those computers, but occassionaly we have to respond to a call from a 98 user who just installed Gator. If our users need anything we just go and install it for them, keeps us safe because we only install things we're licensed for as well as spyware-free.

    27. Re:my experience... by Ummagumma · · Score: 1

      Interesting, Ive never heard of Mimedefang and ClamAV. I'll have to check into them.

      --
      "The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." - Thomas Jefferson
    28. Re:my experience... by MirthScout · · Score: 1

      Yup!

      Any why are so many Windows programs written so poorly in this reguard? Microsoft.

      Yes the default security policies of a Microsoft Windows systems allow, even encourage, a regular user to install software. Heck, the default first user for Windows XP is essentially the administrator. If Microsoft changed the default policies of Windows so that no user had administrative rights unless explicitly added and then changed all thier other software packages such as Office to allow them to be installed by the administrator for use by every user or by a user for use only by that user the system would be much more secure. It would take a while for other 3rd party software makers to fall in line though. Microsoft could simply deny them the use of the Microsoft logo unless thier software complies.

      A regular user should not have administrative priveledges and should not be able to install, change, add or remove anything that would affect another user of the system.

      The current Windows OS design is capable of being pretty secure in theory but until this is addressed by Microsoft it never will be secure in practice.

    29. Re:my experience... by TCaptain · · Score: 1

      Nah...SCO has no IT guys...just lawyers :)

      --
      "I'm not a procrastinator, I'm temporally challenged"
    30. Re:my experience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah...support & development are the same thing...dumbass.

    31. Re:my experience... by mnmn · · Score: 1

      Damn straight. I was supporting 3 Windows2000 public machines getting infected all the time. I denied permissions to EVERYTHING to everyone, added admin allow to everything, and users only had desktop and Documents and Settings directory write allowed. So each user would get infected only on the desktop. Administrator remains clean, even after a year.

      Try it on vulnerable computers where users dont need registry write access. Windows can be very secure but its not by default.

      --
      "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
    32. Re:my experience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Run As is a security hole? I take it you don't use su.

    33. Re:my experience... by TykeClone · · Score: 1
      Spamassassin and ClamAV (actually other antivirus products as well) plug into mimedefang, and can give it a yes or no on whether or not do deliver an e-mail

      Our spam is mainly limited to the info account, so I do deliver it on, but it is tagged as spam and users can easily delete it by a simple outlook rule.

      Viruses are bounced - no sense in having to explain to someone why they have 20 messages with content telling them that the content was deleted. Anymore, most of the virus-ridden e-mail is generated by viruses anyway and don't contain any actual user-user messages.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    34. Re:my experience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you mean "dropped on the floor" for viruses, not "bounced"

    35. Re:my experience... by defore · · Score: 0

      I have a disk too with a useful tool on it. Its called "Ghost".

      I get really tired of trying to explain to these people that these are not their personal computers, and that they should not install this crap (i.e. Date/Time manager Weatherbug etc....)on these machines. I have handed out about 300 Internet Usage policies, Most of them got multiple copies.

      Spybot is a great piece of software, but like its been said before, it cannot do everything.

    36. Re:my experience... by skifreak87 · · Score: 1

      What about for home users? I for one will not put up w/ having to stop everything i'm doing to log off and log onto another username whenever i want to install something (and I know a lot of less tech-savvy people wont want to deal w/ that either/wont deal w/ not being allowed to install their own stuff on their own computer). I'm not arguing that permissions is a bad thing, it's just that without the *nix ability to just login as root in another tty and not close every other program your running/stop what you're doing, i'm going to be that jackass who's main account has admin privledges, and i see that as the better option despite the security risk.

    37. Re:my experience... by furasato · · Score: 1

      Takes me about 15 minutes to clean a machine now. Of course, that is 15 minutes that I could be doing something USEFUL... Like, I dunno, something useful such as supporting your users? I guess if you didn't have to support your users, you wouldnt be needed, right? And, in that case, your employer would fire you and outsource IT to a company like mine. Where do you work again? What is your employers contact information?

    38. Re:my experience... by Viceice · · Score: 1

      Not if the net admin is a moron. In college, the admins setup the XP boxed with restrictions on installing software.

      The shit of the issue is that they way they did it, all the spyware and "toolbars" still manage to auto install, but if somebody pissed at the situation tried to install AdAware or Spybot S&D to fix eth mess themselves, they get blocked.

      --
      Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
    39. Re:my experience... by Ummagumma · · Score: 1

      Ok, I'll bite, troll.

      I have a ton of more useful things to be doing here, than cleaning up machines because users want to browse non-work related sites at work:

      anti-apam software installation
      upgrade of old NT4 machine to 2000
      evaluate and recommend new servers and hardware
      maintain network resources
      install WI-FI network
      document enviornment
      redesigne previous it guys poor backups
      deploy Listserver
      fix and update FTP server and policies
      install new finance project management server
      tons, tons, tons more stuff to do

      You see, the previous IT administration really screwed the pooch, and Im paying for it now. Being the only IT guy supporting 50+ servers, and over 400 desktop and laptops stretches me REAL THIN.

      But hey, Im only an expert at this.

      --
      "The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." - Thomas Jefferson
    40. Re:my experience... by Macgruder · · Score: 1

      SpywareBlaster does NOT detect ot REMOVE spyware, that's not its job.

      It's an immunization tool, to keep known spyware from being installed.

      A lot of programs have similar names, so the program to which you're referring, and the actual program called SpywareBlaster from Javacool may not be the same program

      --
      I'm not crazy,I'm actively irresponsible.
    41. Re:my experience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SpywareBlaster (JavaCool/Wilder) doesn't remove, it only blocks, mostly ActiveX and cookies.

      It is actually recommended as giving "much more control on ActiveX protection" *by* the Spybot guy right in the Spybot UI under "immunize".

      SpywareBlaster is a condom - Spybot S&D and Adaware are penicillin.

      Doesn't Gator/Gain come in as a rider on regular installs of mal-utility stuff, rather than an ActiveX driveby or popup? I don't know, but if so, wouldn't that vector fail to show up in the SpywareBlaster block list?

    42. Re:my experience... by dheltzel · · Score: 1
      I AM however, putting SpamAssassin on a Linux box to do mail filtering. :)

      Your situation sounds very much like mine. I got approval to use Linux for a Spam filter and it is working great. In a recent training class, I showed stats to the users that indicate we throw away 3 Spam emails for every good one they get. They had no idea the problem was that bad.

      BTW, we do use Sendmail and SpamAssassin, but we are using Can-It from Roaring Penguin Software to make is really easy to admin and provide the "paid support contract" that makes the director have a warm, fuzzy feeling. The price was a tiny fraction of the cost of a proprietary package and worth every penny since it's web interface is accessible to non-Linux savvy IT staff. This was the "foot in the door" to get Linux part of our data center. Last Monday we launched our intranet portal (Plone on Linux) and a few weeks back, the Director expressed an interest in finding out what other Windows server apps could be replaced by Linux.

    43. Re:my experience... by Mad_Rain · · Score: 1

      About your sig: I half expected you to link to MCI at the end of it (goddammit, they ruined that song for a fucking phone commercial!).

      just had to vent a moment.

      --
      "What do you think?" "I think 'What, do you think?!'"
    44. Re:my experience... by -cman- · · Score: 1

      That is my biggest headache. I work in a health care facility where HIPPA security is mandantory. Yet half of the "HIPPA compliant" or ancillary applications that people use require Admin privs to run properly.

      I could lock this stuff down in a NY Minute if I didn't have lazy programmers and shit MS security to deal with.

      --
      "Being Irish, he possessed an abiding sense of tragedy which sustained him through brief episodes of joy." -W. B.
    45. Re:my experience... by Alyred · · Score: 1
      I've seen Gator/whatever they've changed their name to now as both malware attached to stuff and a "security window" popup that actually ASKS you if you want to install this software from Gator corporation.

      Nowhere in that page, of course, do they tell you that it's malware. :)

    46. Re:my experience... by SilentChris · · Score: 1

      "it's just that without the *nix ability to just login as root in"

      Uh, you do have that. Right-click any executable and choose Run As. Enter the Administrators password. Don't see Run As? Hold down the shift key when you're right-clicking.

      Want to do it on the command line? Type runas /? for instructions. And don't give me this crap about "The average home user wouldn't..." The average home user wouldn't know about other tty sessions either.

    47. Re:my experience... by Alyred · · Score: 1
      Windows XP/2k have an option that allows you to right-click on a program file and go to "run as" to change your running user permissions for that program.

      The problem is, that it's not ALWAYS available on every link/program/etc. Getting Control Panel and the likes to run under administrator is a bitch when you aren't logged on as admin - You have to create a shortcut to it, then enable that feature under the shortcut settings.

      I can't see why MS didn't enable this feature for EVERYTHING by default. Otherwise, it works really slick.

    48. Re:my experience... by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      The only two to trust are AdAware and Spybot.

      AdAware seems to be updated a lot more often than Spybot. I'm not sure if this is a good thing or not.

    49. Re:my experience... by furasato · · Score: 1

      Ok, I'll bite, troll Gotcha!! hook, line and sinker!! But really, have those users keep you busy. The to-do list you have above are just quick, almost easy projects. And once the servers are in place, they are almost easy to maintain, providing they are running stable software. Once those users are locked down, pray that you don't work yourself out of a job. I have. And once you are out on the streets, finding another good net admin job is quite tough, unless you know someone. So, in a way, pray that those users keep you busy, as a source of job security.

    50. Re:my experience... by skifreak87 · · Score: 1

      I was never aware of this and no one I've ever given that same "rant" to has been aware of it. You're right, the average hom user doesn't know about tty sessions. But they do know, they don't want to have to stop everything and re-login to run/install something. Perhaps if right-clicking revealed run as, instead of shift+right-click (which I never knew was a feature that did anything) it would be more publicized.

    51. Re:my experience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      create MSI packages for each app, digitally sign them, and create a software restriction policy to only run signed MSI's. Then let MSI have admin privileges via policy, all problems solved.

    52. Re:my experience... by flibuste · · Score: 1

      What size is your disk to contain ALL windows XP/200 0 patches ?
      Is that a DVD-RW?

    53. Re:my experience... by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1
      Nowhere in that page, of course, do they tell you that it's malware. :)

      But you know that if it did mention that somewhere in the page, plenty of people would still install it.
      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
    54. Re:my experience... by Ummagumma · · Score: 1

      Not ALL the patches, just the most recent ones since the last time I installed the latest SP, or 'patch frenzy'. There are about 10 pathces on the disc.

      --
      "The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." - Thomas Jefferson
    55. Re:my experience... by omicronish · · Score: 1

      Permissions are your friend. We have a similar situation but we knew long ago that limited permissions was best for most users. They can download all the crap they want -- they just can't install it. Same goes for viruses. We haven't had a single virus or spyware problem since we instituted the policy.

      This might not be feasible if the user has to run poorly-written programs that demand write-access to places that should be read-only. This includes Program Files, the entire HKLM registry tree, and the Windows directory. Note that Power Users gives users permissions to write to these directories, so try not to place users in the Power Users group.

      However, if no such programs are used, this is a great way to prevent crap like this from spreading. It saved my ass recently when a piece of spyware tried to install via an IE exploit (for which no patch existed at the time, which is the reason why I use Firefox now). The program tried to copy files to Windows\System32, but it was read-only to me. I was running as a regular Users account.

      About the poorly-written programs bit, I have yet to encounter a program like that without a clone that is as poorly written. In particular, Microsoft software is good at adhering to those guidelines (duh, since they were written by MS).

    56. Re:my experience... by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      Unless you are a developer for windows or need windows only specific crap, USE A MAC!!!!

      If you really must use a windows ONLY APP, then get Citrix for windows server, and you can run a remote APP inside a browser VNC style login on the main server.

      99% of business as it seams CAN LIVE without windows, they should really eveluate about what they are really using.

      Apple should also advertise/promote more as an alternative,and their machines are prettier, but no IT dude is going to recomend macs since they will be soon out of a job when nothing goes wrong.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    57. Re:my experience... by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      Perhaps if right-clicking revealed run as, instead of shift+right-click (which I never knew was a feature that did anything) it would be more publicized.

      In XP - the first NT-based version of Windows that was targeted at home users - it *does*.

    58. Re:my experience... by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      Apple should also advertise/promote more as an alternative,and their machines are prettier, but no IT dude is going to recomend macs since they will be soon out of a job when nothing goes wrong.

      They'll probably be out of a job long before that - like when the first hardware bills that are 50% higher than they were start rolling in.

    59. Re:my experience... by KJKHyperion · · Score: 1

      Try out the Windows Application Compatibility Toolkit, in particular the Application Verifier, which helps you diagnose problems in badly written programs, and the Compatibility Administrator, which fixes said problems when the vendor is unresponsive and/or you aren't in the position of fixing the application yourself (you have to see to believe). Windows already comes with a large database of known probems and runtime patches ("shims"), and Microsoft has to accept suggestions for additions to the database (didn't try myself) as many applications are added in each Service Pack. Unfortunately, however, the API for shim DLLs has not been published yet, so if you can't find the right fix in the database you're on your own.

      Random technical note: the shim engine is started by user32.dll, so you can't patch programs that don't import it. Of Win32 applications, only pure ANSI C programs compiled with Visual C++ fit this profile, AFAIK, and I haven't seen many (example: the bzip2 port for Windows). On the other hand, I think it could be made possible by applying the "propagate shim engine" patch to Winlogon.exe

      --

      Make a difference - use Windows! (open source clone of Windows NT)

    60. Re:my experience... by k12linux · · Score: 1

      And MS is just as guilty itself. Office-2k runs with restricted rights, however, in order to get the "organizational chart" objects to work, students needed WRITE rights to the freakin C:\WINNT directory!

      That's just rediculous.

  6. Good tools. by grub · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Spybot Search & Destroy [Best spyware cleaner IMHO, also immunizes against re-installation]
    Javacool's Spyware Blaster [works well in conjunction with Spybot]

    I used to use Lavasoft's AdAware but after it wasn't updated for a while someone recommended Spybot which I've stuck with.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Good tools. by WebGangsta · · Score: 2, Informative
      I used to use Lavasoft's AdAware but after it wasn't updated for a while someone recommended Spybot which I've stuck with.

      Ad Aware was updated a few weeks ago to version 6.181 (?) and does a better job of getting rid of stuff (including CWS) than the current version of Spybot. Normally, I would run Ad Aware then Spybot to finish cleaning stuff that Ad Aware left behind, but now I've found that I have to run Spybot first followed by Ad Aware. This may be temporary, but still...

      I think it has to do with some of these spyware/virus programs deactivating these sweeper programs or munging the hosts file so they can't get the updates. At least with a download of Ad Aware (without the latest update), you can get the bulk of things cleaned up enough to be able to access the update sites afterwards for a second pass with your favorite spy-removal tool.

    2. Re:Good tools. by Mitchell+Mebane · · Score: 1

      I also highly recommend WebRoot SpySweeper. It is a bit expensive, but in my experience works even better than SpyBot - high praise indeed. Too bad the GUI sucks.

      --

      The roots of education are bitter, but the fruit is sweet.
      --Aristotle
  7. i heard that... by psychalgia · · Score: 3, Interesting

    with the company i work for id love to make suggestions to help people rid themselves of this, but were not allowed because its all third party stuff. i dont work for an ISP, but an internet banking group, and time after time people are blaming their bank for redirect hijackers and popups...all i can say is that your computer is messed up and you should try to call your ISP for assistance. not like theyd be in a much better sitch than me. too bad we can convince people to stop clicking on every bloody thing that pops onto their screen.

    --

    ________________________________________________

    1. Re:i heard that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      JERK. tell them to call a computer technician, coz thats all that their ISP is going to tell them.

    2. Re:i heard that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong answer. The ISP can not possibly deal with all the shit a customer installs on their computer and will most likely tell them that they need to have a technician examine it.

      It's better to tell the luser this yourself and save them the time. If they don't know any technicians send them to the yellow pages where they're sure to find a store front that will be happy to collect $60/hour to unfuck their box.

  8. Removal Tools by tsheriffk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    between spy-bot and hijack this, i have been able to remove any spyware i have encountered. The trick with spybot, is that people need to know what they are doing, so they dont screw up their computer. Adaware is dummy proof, but only does gets a portion of the stuff.

    1. Re:Removal Tools by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      I found hijack this while cleaning up a sasser infected machine and have started using it - seems to work well and does make it fairly easy to get rid of some of those startup programs that hassle you.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
  9. Always a winner... by theirishman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Personaly I find foramt C: the best for getting rid of crap like that!

    1. Re:Always a winner... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHA omgomgomg ROFL yuo are teh funneee~~~!!!!!!!!11111oneonetwo!!three (and learn to spell, retard)

    2. Re:Always a winner... by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 1

      yuo are teh funneee

      (and learn to spell, retard)

      Indeed, sir, "yuo are teh funneee". I congratulate you on your "funneee".

      --
      This is where the serious fun begins.
    3. Re:Always a winner... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bad spelling is the post is the point of it. The grandparent made a lame joke that showed little to no intelligence - just trying to show his fast technological knowledge of formatting a drive. Thus, the point of the parent is that the "yuo are teh funneee" line shows how childish and immature the grandparent is. I'm surprised you can't figure this out. Oh, your UID is very high. Are you new here?

    4. Re:Always a winner... by happyfrogcow · · Score: 4, Funny

      i prefer

      Fermat C:

      it not only formats the C drive but fills it with results of x^n + y^n = z^n for various values

    5. Re:Always a winner... by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 1

      The bad spelling is the post is the point of it.

      You do surprise me...

      The AC replying to the grandparent made a lame joke in response to a common, typical /. joke. Badly. I'm surprised you can't...oh never mind.

      Are you new here?

      Well, you could always check my user page and see how many postings I've made, how many submissions I've had accepted/rejected?

      --
      This is where the serious fun begins.
    6. Re:Always a winner... by Craig+Ringer · · Score: 1

      I rather like:

      dd if=/mirror/win2k_snap/2004-04-01.img of=/dev/hda1

      myself :-)

      Windows misbehaving? Re-image from a recent snapshot. If, like me, you only use it for occasional gaming that's a fuss-free solution.

    7. Re:Always a winner... by Maple+Syrup · · Score: 1
      foramt C:
      'foramt' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
      operable program or batch file.
    8. Re:Always a winner... by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 2, Funny

      > Fermat C:
      >
      > it not only formats the C drive but fills it with results of x^n + y^n = z^n for various values

      I have discovered a truly remarkable spyware removal method which this text entry box is too small to contain.

    9. Re:Always a winner... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All good things start with an FDISK.

    10. Re:Always a winner... by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1

      ha! that's funny stuff.

    11. Re:Always a winner... by gwayne · · Score: 1

      I prefer

      ferment c:

      which fills your drive with beer.

  10. Uhhgg..... by davecrist · · Score: 1

    yeah... this is easily the most common thing that I fix during customer service calls. I'd guess about 9 out of ten calls. I try to tell customers what to do and not do but they just have no idea how common spyware is. dave ps... FP? Me? Sweet.

  11. Spyware ? by Sch0pehauer · · Score: 1

    Spyware ? ... no spyware, it is called online support for your software :-)

  12. Easy as Dell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The fast-growing phenomenon is already responsible for more than 12 percent of all technical support calls in Dell's consumer hardware division"

    Am I the only one who noticed something funny with that statement?

    1. Re:Easy as Dell by Paul+d'Aoust · · Score: 1

      I think so. It doesn't look odd to me.

      --
      Standing at the very edge of my imagination, I peered into the inky void and realised -- I couldn't think up a new sig.
    2. Re:Easy as Dell by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

      I did. Shouldn't that be Software division and not Hardware division?

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    3. Re:Easy as Dell by socode · · Score: 1

      No, since Dell is a hardware company that happens to bundle its hardware with software that makes their hardware useful.

    4. Re:Easy as Dell by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

      hmmm...

      OK, point made.

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
  13. Bonzi Buddy by AtariAmarok · · Score: 5, Funny

    I always ask Bonzi Buddy to help solve my spyware problems. He is always so helpful!

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Bonzi Buddy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? I thought nothing is more helpful than Clippy.

      Clippy: It seems you are running a spyware. Would you like me to help gathering all personal info to be sent out?

    2. Re:Bonzi Buddy by omicronish · · Score: 1

      I always ask Bonzi Buddy to help solve my spyware problems. He is always so helpful!

      The scary part is one of my uncles actually considered Bonzi Buddy helpful, and proceeded to install it on computers on my network. He finished one and was about to install on another when I intervened and warned him.

      That purple monkey still scares me to this day. Seriously. I'd be filled with a mixture of anger and fear if I ever saw it pop up on my screen.

  14. Spyware is eeeevil by JosKarith · · Score: 1

    In the past 2 weeks I've had to remove Master-Search's little pressie from our works server, and Cool Web Search from my housemate's computer. I swear, I spend more time protecting these damn things than using them

    --
    'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
  15. What a Crock by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If I remember correctly from a previous article (3-6 months ago), Dell prohibits its tech support from helping customers remove certain programs that could be considered spyware. They are unable to do so because Dell, and some other suppliers have partnerships with the makers of the borderline spyware.

    What a crock!

    --

    Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
    1. Re:What a Crock by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 5, Informative
      --

      Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
    2. Re:What a Crock by turbosk · · Score: 1

      It's amazing what you can find when you look....

      The Average PC is Infested with Spyware
      Posted by michael on Fri Apr 16, '04 05:36 PM
      from the gaaaaaaah dept.
      WoodenRobot writes "This article claims that Earthlink have discovered that the average user's PC has 28 spyware programs on it.

      Spyware More Common in Popular Software?
      Posted by Cliff on Mon Apr 12, '04 12:45 PM
      from the watch-what-you-install dept.
      Keith Young asks: "Over the past month, we have seen a 1500% increase of spyware denials on our firewall primarily due to WildTangent 'spyware' installed with AOL IM 5.5 and adware installed with Weatherbug.

      Spyware on One in Twenty Computers?
      Posted by michael on Fri Mar 05, '04 06:17 PM
      from the PEBKAC dept.
      SpaceDonkey writes "New Scientist reports that researchers at the University of Washington carried out a scan of the campus network for signs of spyware. They found spyware lurking on more than one in 20 machines

      Dell To Techs: Don't Help Customers Remove Spyware
      Posted by timothy on Tue Dec 02, '03 11:35 PM
      from the thanks-mike-thanks-a-bunch dept.
      Alien54 writes "Well, more exactly, be advised that if you are giving a Dell for Xmas, not only will it probably come preloaded with spyware, but their tech support lines will refuse to tell users how to remove it, and will not give people advice on where to find some good tools to remove it. As seen in the latest newsletter from SpyWareInfo, Dell sent an internal memo to its tech support minions which says in part: 'NOTICE: Use of spyware removal software may conflict with user license agreements of other applications installed on your system. Please consult your user license agreements for further information. Dell does not endorse the use of spyware removal software and cannot provide support on these products.' This means we do not take callers to download.com or doxdesk.com, nor do we recommend spyware removal programs, nor do we advise callers on the use of spyware removal programs. This includes using phrases "We don't support the removal of spyware, but I use..."'"

    3. Re:What a Crock by DR+SoB · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Adaware is great, except i've found they've missed many brutal spyware programs before, especially programs that deeply imbed themselves in other programs (such as Windows Media Player, very common). SpyBot seems to miss a few as well, although normally not as many as Adaware. After running Adaware and Spybot on a few heavily effected computers, I think installed the new Norton Antivirus 2004 + Internet Security, and it found 9-15 OTHER missed spyware programs.. Of course, to fix them all I would have to boot on the disk and run it seperately..blah!

      I've found installing NetScape also helps greatly, as it blocks many malicious pop-up ads. Normally when I'm asked to configure a computer for someone, the last step is to delete shortcuts to IE and install Netscape as the default, people are wierded out at first (I've never seen this browser before! "It's great!"), but after a while they swear by it too.

      My brother recently brought a computer I gave him just maybe 5 months ago, home from University for me to inspect, because of "poor performance' (P4 @ 2.6 w/ 1 gig ram, GeForce 4, poor performance? What the hell is he running), well I booted it and opened the task manager, running at 100% NON-STOP, Memory almost maxed, and at least 30 Un-identified programs running. Forget spybot or anything, it's FDISK time! But it gave me some insight into the average user, because he told me he noticed it was running slow, so he uninstalled as many valid programs as possible (of course to no effect), the average user has NO IDEA what's wrong, they just know the thing runs slower then the old Apple II's!

      --
      Mod +5 Drunk
    4. Re:What a Crock by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1
      If I remember correctly from a previous article (3-6 months ago), Dell prohibits its tech support from helping customers remove certain programs that could be considered spyware. They are unable to do so because Dell, and some other suppliers have partnerships with the makers of the borderline spyware.

      Not quite. The reason that Dell support prohibits its tech support from doing so is that some programs have a EULA that require you to install and run the spyware. Therefore by helping them uninstall it, Dell's support is encouraging users to break the EULA which could put them into legal trouble.

      If you install and run Spybot S&D you'll see a warning message telling you that if you remove the spyware on some applications you may be violating the EULA.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    5. Re:What a Crock by khankell · · Score: 1

      Well, in my case, I used to work for one of Dell's competitors (the one that looks like a cow and runs like a pig), and we weren't allowed to remove spyware from a user's computer on the main support line either.
      It wasn't because we had any agreements with them (to my knowledge), but because the company wanted the poor users to call the "tutorial" support line and pay $1.95 a minute to remove things like Xupiter that really do break the functionality of Windows.

      Depending on how I felt that day, I'd sometimes save them the money and wipe out the hard drive. Better the devil you know...

      --
      "Luck is what others call skill when they have none." --Phelan Kell
    6. Re:What a Crock by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 1

      Somehow I don't think Dell is afraid of the mighty Claria(Gator) legal department. Properly supporting users' systems would be more important to Dell than fending off a couple of nuisance lawsuits from fly by night spyware companies. For this reason, I think Dell probably does have some sort of behind the scenes agreement with some spyware producers.

    7. Re:What a Crock by Trifthen · · Score: 2, Informative

      Careful just saying adaware. The software is named Ad-aware, a start contrast to Ada-Ware which is itself a spyware program masquerading as a removal tool. Note that both of these are "adaware" when all punctuation and capitalization are removed. Scary, huh?

      --
      Read: Rabbit Rue - Free serial nove
    8. Re:What a Crock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can see Dell's point. Removing some spyware will actually toast your system.

      So Granny calls Dell to ask for help with a badly running system, they suggest SpyBot, she runs it, and cannot get back the socket stolen by some damn pr0n dialer, IE won't run because it's stolen search window is gone, and she has no clue what to do. Gee, now she thinks Dell is liable for repairing or replacing her computer.

      SpyWare is not Dell's problem.

  16. Some solutions to spyware by mausmalone · · Score: 4, Informative

    AdAware is a great program, I swear by it. Also, working at a help desk, I often tell people to go into IE advanced settings and disable 3rd party browser extensions. They seem to think that if it's a toolbar for IE, it's automatically a great idea to download it.

    --
    -=-=-=-=-=
    I'd rather be flamed than ignored.
    1. Re:Some solutions to spyware by iamcadaver · · Score: 1

      Anyone care to post a .reg to automate this.

      Please!

      --
      Before I part with'em: two pennies weigh ~4.996+/-0.014g, have a zinc core, and the face of Lincoln. You can keep 'em.
  17. Should be integrated into AV software by Goodl · · Score: 4, Insightful

    get on it Symantec etc. this getting to be as big if not a bigger problem than viruses. All the computers of family and friends are rife with this stuff, and they won't stump for Ad-aware pro as well as AV sw

    --
    I've got some photographs, I'd like to show them to you. Though you don't know the girls You'll recognise the view..
    1. Re:Should be integrated into AV software by DesignShark · · Score: 0

      Mcaffee has started to integrate spyware searches into its antivirus software. However an enterprise solution is really needed. I am really suprised that large corporations are missing this simple cash cow.

    2. Re:Should be integrated into AV software by abrinton · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Funny, it is integrated into McAfee. I use it in my 100 person company and it works pretty well. The feature is called "Find Unwanted Programs" or something. It's all set up with EPO so I know every desktop has it, and nobody can turn it off. Catches most spyware, and McAfee is good about updating.

      There is one major drawback. McAfee decides what is an "unwanted program" and you can't change it. It stops some tools that I would rather it didn't. However, I've found this trade off to be well worth it as I spend exactly *nill* time cleaning spyware.

      I get calls all the time about the "virus" someone or other just got though.

    3. Re:Should be integrated into AV software by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

      The newest trend-micro anti-virus also has spyware protection.

    4. Re:Should be integrated into AV software by blunte · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I spent an hour with our Symantec account rep last year imploring him to communicate how badly we need spyware protection integrated with virus protection.

      In the US corporate world, Symantec is probably the leader. If they would just buy Spybot or something, build in a spyware signature download system (as they have with virus), my job would be so much easier. I'd even happily pay them another 5k$ for that feature on our machine.

      But this sales guy didn't even know what spyware was.

      Symantec really missed out on a big feature that would have set them apart from McAfee.

      --
      .sigs are for post^Hers.
    5. Re:Should be integrated into AV software by youngec · · Score: 1

      Symantec was REALLY bullheaded about adding expanded threat detection to their Corporate products like SAV. "Go buy Symantec Client Security", they said. BS. Now look what they did under pressure (prob cuz McAfee VS Enterprise one-up'd them for over a year): SAV 9.0 can detect "expanded threats" just like their HOME product (NAV 2004) has been able to do for over 7 months. Too bad it doesn't detect expanded threats realtime (only via full/scheduled scans).

  18. No Doubt by PhraudulentOne · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I support this kind of thing every day at work with the odd internet customer/staff member. Spybot has really helped out a lot - its free, small, and works great. I can believe the 12% figure, but here at the ISP I work for, its more like 60% of calls, only the customer doesn't know they are calling for this particular problem. For them, the internet and their computer has just bogged right down so they think something is wrong with the internet.

    --
    You create your own reality - Leave mine to me.
  19. Programs by Coda+A27 · · Score: 1

    Spyboy and Adaware are the two programs I always install when I reformat my computer. I'm a little paranoid since I shop online a lot - amazon, newegg, ebay. I want to teach my parents the value of running them both once a week as well since they often visit foreign, non-english sites to watch TV and videos and I don't have a clue what they could be getting.

  20. Reading this article on a Linux box... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Funny


    ...priceless.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:Reading this article on a Linux box... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pointless....

      This is an article about generic users. Superb for you that you run linux but, they don't. Thank you for not contributing something constructive to the conversation.

    2. Re:Reading this article on a Linux box... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got to agree on that. I have no spyware, no viruses, no worms, no BSOD, no regular reformat and reload from original media. It's so painless to keep Debian fully patched that I do it nearly every time I log in.

      Unfortunately, MS is attempting to become the de facto regulatory body for the Internet, and only a small minority of us see it, much less the dangers that it entails. Imagine a police force that doesn't protect you from anything and occasionally comes around and replaces everyone's locks with a newer model that has no actual bolt.

      Assuming that the spyware is not calling home to a hard-coded IP address, you can also make use of this approach. It can even make annoying banner ads go away. It's stunning how much faster some pages load when you aren't downloading ads from slow servers.

    3. Re:Reading this article on a Linux box... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Security through obscurity works, right? Wait till the year of the Linux desktop finally arrives. Oh, then you'll migrate to a less popular platform because you believe that the OS you use dictates how elite and/or smart you are, right?

      You're a fucking idiot. I've got Linux running just like you but I don't have the blatant desire to be a pedantic douchebag. Say, have you stopped molesting small children yet?

      Sorry about the "security through obscurity" catchphrase - I'm sure you're too stupid to know what it means, even though it's as simple as opening a box of cereal.

    4. Re:Reading this article on a Linux box... by Glowing+Fish · · Score: 1

      I might have to log in as root to play fceu-svga, but hey, I don't have to worry about weird crap going on.

      --
      Hopefully I didn't put any [] around my words.
    5. Re:Reading this article on a Linux box... by thomasdelbert · · Score: 1


      If linux were as pervasive as windows, it would have spyware on it too - do you think the inherant security of the machine make any difference when the software is easily installed on your machine through social engineering techniques? YOu may be smarter than that, but 95% of computer users aren't.

      - Thomas;

      --
      ___ This sig is in boldface to emphasize its importance!
    6. Re:Reading this article on a Linux box... by cgreuter · · Score: 1

      If linux were as pervasive as windows, it would have spyware on it too

      That's a common argument (also used for viruses) but I don't think it's correct. There are several things about Linux that makes it more secure:

      1. Windows has a culture of running everything as a privileged user (or has no concept of non-privileged users at all), so a downloaded program usually has the run of the system. Linux (and other Unixes), on the other hand, are designed around the assumption that some of the users will be hostile k1dd13z. For spyware to work under Linux, it'll need to be deliberately installed by root.
      2. Windows installers (e.g. Install Shield) tend to be in the package itself, while Linux package installers are part of the core OS (e.g. rpm). That means that under Linux, you can always uninstall and always check for files not in the package database when you're looking for tricklers.
      3. Linux is extremely diverse. Each distribution will do a lot of things differently and it'd be a real nightmare to write spyware that's compatitible with all of them. Not impossible, granted, especially if one vendor gets a majority of the market share, but still.
      4. Internet Explorer and Outlook Express both have some pretty serious security problems. I'm not just talking about bugs, here--there's a concious decision to prefer usability over security. OE is so helpful and friendly that it'll automatically run executable attachments and IE routinely links to downloaded DLLs (i.e. ActiveX components). And almost every Windows user in the world routinely uses these programs. Meanwhile, the Unix community figured out that automatically running untrusted code is a bad thing some twenty years ago.
      5. Speaking of IE and OE, those are pretty much the standard web browser and mailer under Windows. Linux has no such thing and Linux spyware will need to be compatible with a whole lot of different programs to hit any kind of market segment.
      6. Through COM, IE is scriptable. Some Linux web browsers have similar interfaces, but not all and those that do don't do it the same way. So making popups appear when you browse the web is going to be a lot harder if not impossible.
      7. Then, there's the whole open-source/closed-source security debate, which has already been hashed-over to death here.

      So there are some fundamental things that would make Linux spyware difficult. Whether it's difficult enough that to make spyware not worth the bother is another question.

  21. Microsoft is just jealous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft claims half of all computer crashes reported by its customers are caused by spyware and its equivalents.

    If it crashes, Microsoft wants it to be their crash. They're not going to roll over and let just anyone compete in the crash business. They want it all for themselves.

  22. my tech support friend by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    tells me he still gets a great deal of PEBKAC calls...

    1. Re:my tech support friend by donnyspi · · Score: 1

      sometimes PEBKAC and spyware calls are one in the same

  23. Omission by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1

    There's a little bit of an omission in the article: Spyware is becoming the number one tech support problem for Windows users. Macs and Linux are, as usual, unaffected.

    --
    I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    1. Re:Omission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet another reason to dump Windows :)

    2. Re:Omission by gordonb · · Score: 2, Interesting
      If you define spyware as programs from third party sources, you may be right. I'm not sure that there is a total lack spyware out there. I haven't seen any yet, though.

      However, OS X appears to phone home on boot. Check out some of the ip traffic (you can't use kismet or such as the OS X box is still booting, but you can look at the log from your router/firewall). This may not be spyware, technically, but Apple does see which systems are connected, if you let them. If you block this traffic or boot without an internet connection, the system still works fine, of course. I don't have an XP box to play with, but my buddy Amit says the same thing occurs. Any comments?

    3. Re:Omission by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      Just an idea: might it perhaps be the Software Update and the Network Time Service that call home? (for OS X, and XP has similar services). I'm not saying that there isn't anything that calls home with malicious intent, but those two would be a valid explanation for "calling home".

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    4. Re:Omission by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1

      I think it's network time phoning home. If you notice, the servers in the network time connection are something.apple.com. But I don't think it's Apple somehow stealing your information. And besides, it's better then something downloading and installing itself under false pretenses or without your knowledge.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
  24. Re-image the machines. by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 1

    Simple. Takes half an hour on a decent network.

    Eh, you do store all your data on servers and build your client systems from standard images, don't you?

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
    1. Re:Re-image the machines. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that would be great if my company could afford the infrastructure for that.

      Unfortunately, I have to deal with locally stored email and documents. All of our designs and such are stored on a server though. So that's nice. The problem is that email is almost as important these days.

    2. Re:Re-image the machines. by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I guess you'll have to deal with the cost of not thinking ahead then and we won't.

      --
      Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  25. i wouldn't mind by irokie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "the developers get paid, in theory, by companies that want to harness the spare computing cycles on thousands of computers to solve some complex computing problem."

    i wouldn't actually mind giving a fwe of my spare cycles to someone if they needed them for something legitimate.
    everyone i know ran the SETI@home screensaver... not only were you contributing to something, but it looked way cool too!

    --
    and if you see me strut, remind me of what left this outlaw torn...
  26. Not an issue for OS X users by XavierItzmann · · Score: 1

    There has not been a single documented virus, worm, trojan, or spyware instance for OS X.

    We are talking about a 3-year old OS installed in over 10 million machines.

    (Yes, I know someone did a proof of concept for a trojan. No, this prototype has not infected anyone.)

    Tell me again why do techies insist on spec'ing 2000/XP at the office?

    --
    The next pasture is always greener
    1. Re:Not an issue for OS X users by djsmiley · · Score: 1

      Because people who take courses to learn word processing / excel skills learn to use WINDOWS and ONLY windows.

      Btw, mac also cost through the roof, and was there ever any virus's for that weird O/S, whats it called again? Oh yeh LINUX!

      --
      - http://www.milkme.co.uk
    2. Re:Not an issue for OS X users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because we're forced to by the clueless upper management who freak out without Clippy there to guide them.

    3. Re:Not an issue for OS X users by compro01 · · Score: 0, Troll

      yeah, that would only be as apple keep its security holes secret and unpatched. that does do a good gob of keeping out the script kiddies but any one who is persistent will get through. the price of fixxing a hole is that everyone know that the whole is there and will exploit it in the time between when the patch is released and when everyone has it.

      macs don't get virii fo the same eason Linux doesn't. its not really common enough as a desktop OS to be worth it. but if macs ever become more popular than windows, we'll have the same thing over again.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    4. Re:Not an issue for OS X users by Fearless+Freep · · Score: 1

      >macs don't get virii fo the same eason Linux doesn't. its not really common enough as a desktop OS to be worth it. but if macs ever become more popular than windows, we'll have the same thing over again.

      This seems to be said so often that's it's taken as a truism but I do't buy it

      Linux and Windows have completely different histories and and came from completely different design philosophies in terms of security, multiple users, networking, etc.. *perhaps* if there is a concentrated effort to exploit OSX and Linux things will be as bad, but until that actually happens, I'm not so sure it can be taken for granted that this would actually happen. It could also be that hte reason windows is exploited more often is simply that it's more easily exploited?

    5. Re:Not an issue for OS X users by yabos · · Score: 1

      There's Limewire, which has spyware in it. I don't think it installs a bunch of crap that runs in the background collecting info though.

    6. Re:Not an issue for OS X users by OwnedByTwoCats · · Score: 1

      Not at all true. MacOS X and Linux systems don't have the virus and spyware problems that Windows machines do because MacOS X and Linux were designed with security in mind. On MacOS X, user processes pop up a dialog box asking for an administration password when installing new software. Windows happily complies with the request coming from the browser.

    7. Re:Not an issue for OS X users by INeededALogin · · Score: 0

      macs don't get virii fo the same eason Linux doesn't. its not really common enough as a desktop OS to be worth it. but if macs ever become more popular than windows, we'll have the same thing over again.

      Linux doesn't get virii? What about this one, or this one, this, this, this...
      and that is just the first page of Norton Virus Query.

      Mac's first page summary is 1 hoax, 1 proof-of concept, 1 Applescript to Microsoft virus and an old school Classic virus. Ironic that the only virus on that first page relates to Microsoft technology?

    8. Re:Not an issue for OS X users by Fearless+Freep · · Score: 1

      > Ironic that the only virus on that first page relates to Microsoft technology?

      I've wondered about OSX security with MS Office apps running on it... I've also wondered about the future of Linux security with so many groups bending over backwards to get Linux to act like Windows for it's users

    9. Re:Not an issue for OS X users by SomeGuyFromCA · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > On MacOS X, user processes pop up a dialog box asking for an administration password when installing new software.

      And users react in one of two ways, if not both:

      a) they routinely put in the password for everything
      b) they bitch about "this is stupid, why can't it be like windows where I never have to enter a password" and if they're really troublesome, they'll find a program that will enter their password FOR them

      This is the same reason I roll my eyes at "Linux has user accounts and only one root so it is perfectly secure" posts. Most people would then run, day-to-day, as root. People would still install every trojan horsed piece of shit that comes along.

      It doesn't matter how many locks you have if you hate unlocking them, so you leave them open.

      --
      if the answer isn't violence, neither is your silence / freedom of expression doesn't make it alright
    10. Re:Not an issue for OS X users by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      The smart thing to do would be to automatically log installations if they request admin privileges. Perhaps this could be built into the authentication framework.

    11. Re:Not an issue for OS X users by Lurker · · Score: 1
      Because people who take courses to learn word processing / excel skills learn to use WINDOWS and ONLY windows.

      Microsoft Office, in case you hadn't heard, is available for MacOS X. It isn't that hard to learn your way around MacOS X if you've been trained on Windows (or visa versa, for that matter.)

      Btw, mac also cost through the roof, and was there ever any virus's for that weird O/S, whats it called again? Oh yeh LINUX!

      You can get an eMac for $800. If you can get education pricing, you can get a CDROMless eMac for $600.

    12. Re:Not an issue for OS X users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent not "Insightful", but "Ignorant".

      He just pulled this out of his hat. Sounds good, as long as you don't know anything about it. This guy's clearly never used a Mac or observed someone using one, or he'd know (b) especially is ridiculous.

      Users *would* react thusly:

      a) Hey, I wasn't installing anything! What's that about? Cancel. (Okay, maybe not every user, but at least they'd have the option.)

      b) Never gonna happen. RrrrrrIght, an OS X user bitching "why can't this be like windows".....!

      Now if a user *is* deliberately installing stuff with, unbeknowst to him, spyware, that will be a problem of course. Nothing you're ever gonna do about that.

      But anyone smart enough to "find a program to enter passwords for them", is smart enough to avoid deliberately installing spyware, which is the only real scenario for the introduction of this crap. Unlike IE under Windows where it gets intsalled without your help, among other built in security holes.

      By the way, there is such a program, it's built-in, it's called the Keychain; but you *still* can't install without entering a password.

    13. Re:Not an issue for OS X users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so that OS upgrade costs $800
      plus another $200 to get rid of the machine you currently had.

      wow what a deal

    14. Re:Not an issue for OS X users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, the voice of a jaded Windows loser.

    15. Re:Not an issue for OS X users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a) Hey, I wasn't installing anything! What's that about? Cancel.

      Yeah, this is part of the idea in making the password pop-up for every install that alters something important. It works too, for things that install themselves out of nowhere.

      The only problem is that a lot of this spyware comes along for the ride with an installation of a package that the user determines to be legitemate.

      As in: some user wants to install software that tells him what the weather is like outside, when they have an office with a window, and could look outside and know for sure what the weather is like. But when he installs it, he gets several other "malware" programs with it.

      So, he enters the password to get the program he wants, and it also installs the program he doesn't.

  27. I know how it is by MoSiAc · · Score: 1

    I've been working for the college I attends IT department and we get more calls dealing with people thinking they have spyware or are sure they have spy ware and having to deal with them is painful at best, but many people don't know that the software they install is doing things like this to their computer.

  28. I don't get it by Fearless+Freep · · Score: 1

    I keep reading articles about how much trouble spyware, adware and virii are and yet these are predominantly delieverd through a combiantion of MS Outlook, MS Explorer and indeed MS Windows.

    Surely the transition to Mozilla, Firefoxx, Linux, etc...has got to be cheaper than continuing to service these kinds of problems?

    I think the problem is that some people simply don't know any other way so take these problems as 'evil necessities' when they really don' thave to be.

    1. Re:I don't get it by compro01 · · Score: 1

      yeah but wholesale switch over means that the virii writers and spy/adware makers will make use of those and run from windows like everyone else. macs and linux are only safe for nw from this as they're not popular enough to be worth it and on average Linux users are more aware of what is normal and what doesn't belong on a system

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    2. Re:I don't get it by Fearless+Freep · · Score: 1

      > macs and linux are only safe for nw from this as they're not popular enough to be worth it

      As I said in another post, I'm not sure I agree with this.

      Windows and linux have such different histories and design philosophies in terms of security, multiple users, and networking that I don't think it can be said that the two are just as inherently exploitable as each other and the only difference in actual numbers of exploits is simply attention due to numbers

  29. Been there...all too recently by nicktripp · · Score: 1

    I spent three hours last Sunday at the house of a friend of my in-laws removing spy/ad/malware. He just couldn't grasp how his brand new $2800 Windows MCE PC could be so useless in just a month. He was averaging about 60% processor usage from all of that junk. I still couldn't get it completely clean before I had to leave, but I at least got Ad-Aware, Spybot S&D, updated Virus definitions and a firewall installed.

  30. A few tips i give to friends by insomaniac · · Score: 2, Informative

    1. Run a good anti spy ware tool like spybot or ad aware.

    2. Don't use IE or Outlook

    3. Don't use Kazaa or most other p2p clients

    4. Don't run any and every program you come across

    This helped my friends a lot, my father was really offended by spyware and who can blame him, he's a firefox fan till the end now... :)

    --
    The way to corrupt a youth is to teach him to hold in higher value them who think alike than those who think differently
    1. Re:A few tips i give to friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A few tips I give to acquaintances.
      1. Learn to use the shift key
      2. Don't teach your grandma to suck eggs - you're out of your class here.

  31. People by Schezar · · Score: 4, Funny

    Every time I remove this crud, I explain exactly why they had it to begin with. I tell them Comet Cursor , Gator, Bonzai Buddy, and the like are VIRUSES. Absolute VIRUSES. I tell them not to download them, and the problems will never come back. I set their IE security settings to not allow Active X as well.

    Within days, they're all back. "But I LIKE my Comet Cursor! I didn't think it would happen this time."

    The problem here is that many people today lack basic problem solving skills. They see a problem with their VCR, they fix it. (Clock's off, let's say). They see a similar problem with their computer, and they freeze up and assume they can't fix it even though, in the case of the clock for example, it's the SAME PROBLEM with nearly the SAME SOLUTION.

    People don't seem to apply their own basic intelligence to computers. Nor do they seem to learn from their mistakes. "Why did you install Spambar again?"

    "I wanted the -feature-. How was I supposed to know it was bad?"

    "Because it caused this SAME PROBLEM THE LAST THREE TIMES YOU INSTALLED IT! I HATE YOU! DIEDIEDIE!" /works for tech support

    --
    GeekNights!
    Late Night Radio for Geeks!
    1. Re:People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "People don't seem to apply their own basic intelligence to computers."

      unfortunatly for society, I think they are. Too bad you can't post a policy on your door that says you "WILL NOT fix the following problems more than once per person:" then list all the stupid things people do. Then they will have to live in their own shit and have some motivation to learn.

    2. Re:People by JaffaKREE · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sometimes it's just about hopeless. I threw together a computer for my girlfriend, who has a Comcast Cable connection. Fully patched, with AVG, Zonealarm, and ad-aware. There are 6 other people who use the computer.

      If I don't maintain it to the point of once-a-week troubleshooting, the next time I stop by, there is more garbage/spyware/viruses/popup junk than I can possibly understand. Comet Cursor, Weatherbug, Bonzi, that "set your clock" thing, backdoors, and a deluge of popups that will make your head spin when IE is loaded ( I installed Opera. They don't like it. ). You're probably thinking, if I had correctly installed all the stuff I said I did, this wouldn't happen, right ?

      If only it were that easy.

      Zonealarm ? Well, they were having problems with their internet one day, and decided it might be that firewall thing, so off it went. Despite my insistence, this happens fairly often - because they don't actually see the negative effects of it.
      Viruses ? AVG just disappears. Someone must be uninstalling it, because it's usually gone when I go looking for it.
      The spyware ? I don't really know where it actually comes from. There's usually a bunch of other junk apps and game demos, I assume that's how they find their way on to the computer.

      So yeah. PEBKAC. at least one of the problems.

    3. Re:People by eth1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      "People don't seem to apply their own basic intelligence to computers"

      That's because computers all have a Common Sense Exclusion Field generator. Anyone coming into that field turns into a dribbling idiot. However technical type people's brainwave patterns generat electromagnetic field around them that nullifies this field. It also knocks quirky hardware and software back into order, which is why it mysteriously starts working once you show up to fix the problem.

    4. Re:People by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

      maybe we need someone to write non-spyware versions of spyware? Could make a good sourceforge project.

    5. Re:People by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

      The problem here is that many people today lack basic problem solving skills.

      Frankly I wouldn't work for a business that didn't have an approved software policy for company PCs. That is, a company machine can only have software X,Y,Z,AA etc installed. If you d/l and install some J.random.software you have violated company policy and will be delt with by HR or whatever. If you just HAVE to have weatherbug, screensaver X, cursor or whatever, you may apply to the IT dept to research and maybe get it on the approved list. At my last job I absolutely refused to play that game, and the company managers agreed. People who installed software and broke their PC or exposed others on the inside of the firewall to risks were not allowed to get away with it easily. At *best* they would not have a pc to use until I 'get around to it', and THEY were held responsible for lost productivity. But expecting me to rush over to fix THEIR problems for violating rules spelled out in the company handbook was quickly discouraged. It's not a matter of IT being unreasonable or difficult, it's a matter of establishing reasonable policies and sticking by them. 'Playing' on company PCs is no more acceptable than checking out a business vehicle and joyriding around town. Anybody that wants to do that type of thing can use their pc at home and pay someone else to clean it up.

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    6. Re:People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should installed 2000/XP on there, and make sure no one but you gets admin (or power user) access?

    7. Re:People by wilfire · · Score: 1

      Someone very board at uni should try and do a study in to this effect because it is so true. If they can find out a way of generating this though they will have to be killed because it will put every tech support guy/girl out of a job.

      --
      Anti gravity, but don't positives and negatives attract, humm a flaw me thinks.
    8. Re:People by Kjella · · Score: 1

      "People don't seem to apply their own basic intelligence to computers"

      That's because computers all have a Common Sense Exclusion Field generator. Anyone coming into that field turns into a dribbling idiot. However technical type people's brainwave patterns generat electromagnetic field around them that nullifies this field.


      Aye, I even hear there are ancient Masters of this Force that can command it at will to create Reality Distortion fields. It is said that the power of Master Jobs are so great, even tech minds can be swayed. Mmmm Mac...

      Kjella

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    9. Re:People by Greyfox · · Score: 1
      Are you charging those people? Maybe you should consider doing so.

      "I'm sorry, Grandma, It's going to cost you $60 an hour for me to fix your system now. If you want to pay me another $60 next week, download all that shit you downloaded before."

      If it's in an IT department, take their computer back to your "lab" for at least a day for a complete format/install, and bill their department for every hour you had the machine. We did that with one of our biggest problem users once after the third time he let the guy down the hall screw up his system. The next month his manager called us and said "Why is your department billing our department 20 grand this month?" and we told him "Oh yeah, (user) down there seems to screw up his machine with an day or two of us fixing it and he's been calling us a lot." To which the manager replied "Oh. Well from now on he'll have to call me before he can call you." We never heard from the guy again.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    10. Re:People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know you're joking, but that's the most reasonable explanation I've ever heard. How else can you explain people being so certain they can't understand computers that they don't even try? There's no logical reason for them to assume they can't understand it! Why? Why do you people turn into morons? A CSEF makes about as much sense as anything...

    11. Re:People by Lemmeoutada+Collecti · · Score: 1

      I agree, simplest explanation and all. But I think the keyboards emit a low intensity SEP (Somebody Else's Problem) field as well, causing non technical users to attempt to blame anyone and everything other than themselves when sitting at the keyboard. As an observation of this, I have placed users in front af a keyboard connected to a non functional machine and observed the same reaction. It is possible that the mouse amplifies this field on contact, that will require further resarch.

      This series of effects has been observed on some other electronics, as well. For quite some time, it was highly noticable on VCR clocks, until the VCR's learned to set themselves as a defense mechanism against Clueless Lossy Usage of Buttoning (CLUBing).

      --

      You can have it fast, accurate, or pretty. Pick any 2.
    12. Re:People by SamSim · · Score: 1

      Personally, I think that if you get rid of all the malware for them, and they go and install all over again, then that's just natural selection. Technological Darwinism.

    13. Re:People by Quazion · · Score: 1

      Good point...

      Its that people like there smilies in the email, so they keep installing stuff like that, unless you can give them a good alternative they will keep doing it.

      I remove spy/malware daily for a living nearly, like 25% or such. Some people are glad the computer is fast and smooth again, but still miss the software.

      Or even worse some paid for spywareremoval software which includes even more shit with it.

      I always tell people that spyware is what pays for the free software they download and install, the sun doesnt come up for nothing.

    14. Re:People by xandroid · · Score: 1

      "It also knocks quirky hardware and software back into order, which is why it mysteriously starts working once you show up to fix the problem."

      My mother hates that effect. "Argh. Argh. ARGH! The Internet's not working!" Then either I or my nerd dad will peek over her shoulder at the monitor, say "do it again", and it'll work. I'm sure she'd happily destroy all the computers in the house if she didn't feel compelled to check her email every five minutes...

      --
      $ echo "ceci n'est pas une pipe" | sed -Ee 's/(eci n|pas )//g'
    15. Re:People by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      Just charge em 2 bottles of good scotch each time to fix it, im sure the will get the hint sooner or later or you will enjoy 2 bottles a week for ever :)

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    16. Re:People by druxton · · Score: 1

      Comet Cursor, Weatherbug, Bonzi, that "set your clock" thing, backdoors, and a deluge of popups that will make your head spin when IE is loaded ( I installed Opera. They don't like it. ).

      You could try blocking sites in the hosts file and installing the Google toolbar with popup blocker.

  32. Nah... by Red+Warrior · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Nothing will ever top the good old keyboard interface error.

    --
    "If, therefore, any be unhappy, let him remember that he is unhappy by reason of himself alone."
    ~Epictetus
  33. Major Slowdown by walterwalter · · Score: 1, Funny

    The most amazing thing to me is how slow some people will allow their computers to become, mostly due solely to spyware. My aunt asked me why it took her computer like 7 minutes to start up. I said it could be the bonzai buddy, three IE search bars and gator, but I couldn't be sure... Hopefully XP SP2 will have some effect in helping to keep people from runing so much of the crap.

  34. Switch? by thesolo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Personally, I have had to remove this plague from the computers of several friends and family members.

    Not to sound snide, but this is exactly why all my family & close friends run Macs now. It's easier on them, and it's a hell of a lot easier on me, since now I don't have to stop over, run Adaware, and clean their systems for them.

    1. Re:Switch? by zulux · · Score: 1



      For all my frinds, I will fix their Windows machine *once* for free.

      After that, I charge my normal hourly rate.

      If they migrate to Mac or FreeBSD - I'll set them up for free and suport them for free.

      Windows is the Chevy Nova of the PC world - cheap, lots of them, and utter crap.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    2. Re:Switch? by jfmiller · · Score: 1

      Just for kicks, (and because I'd like to do this too) How did you git aroung the lack of games, esp. on-line RPG's like FFXI that my youngest brother is addicted to?

      John

      --
      Strive to make your client happy, not necessarly give them what they ask for
    3. Re:Switch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes- aren't Macs wonderful? They way they take up about a billionth of a % of the PC market makes them such and attractive target. Lets all use Macs... oh wait - now we all have a Mac and the spyware is all targetted to them.... Brilliant. This is like saying trying to argue that herion is safer than alcohol - because more people die from alcohol related deaths each year than heroin. But lets make heroin the drug of choice and see how long that situation lasts..

      Seriously people... Use macs - then i can enjoy my windows in peace and quite

  35. Good examples of source of problem by holy_smoke · · Score: 1, Funny

    My wife at work: "Honey, you should install this comet cursor program. Its cool. Also, a friend sent me this cool wallpaper program. You should try it too"

    *looks up wallpaper program - sees it has gator and some other crap wrapped in it*

    Me: "Honey Both of those programs are laden with spyware. You should uninstall them and clean your system"

    My wife: "oh I don't care, I like the cursors and the wallpapers."

    *sigh* okee dokee...but NOT on our home PC.

    --
    Is the juice worth the sqeeze?
    1. Re:Good examples of source of problem by wishlish · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My wife's a librarian, and she's one of the few people I know who I'd let use the computer without my supervision.

      Just tell your wife that she could get fired by installing that crap. It's like letting someone into the building to spraypaint the walls. Company computers aren't yours, and installing crap is akin to damaging company property.

      I mean, you wouldn't take a sledgehammer to a company printer or fax machine, would you? (insert obligatory Office Space joke here)

  36. Joe Sixpack and TCO by mrneutron · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Last night I spent 3 hours at a neighbor's house on spyware patrol. He's a fireman who plows my driveway for free (he is Joe Sixpack personified), and I'm his volunteer tech monkey. I cleaned them all out 2 months ago, and now they were in worse shape.

    All 3 of computers were unable to surf the web. Teenage daughters had downloaded Kazaa, weatherbug, morpheus and others. I explained the dangers of spyware (and getting sued by the RIAA, hoping the scare them into ending the spyware party) to them last time, with predictable results. I also advised Dad to lay down the law (I'm not holding my breath).

    The 98SE box (yeah, I know) was completely hosed. Booted up, auto-launched about 8 different programs, auto popups, and would actually blue screen before I could launch a single app. I blew that one away, reinstalled from scratch, and ran Windows update (requiring 5 reboots) for close to 2 hours (ever run windows update after a clean install of 4-year old media? Not fun).

    And he has a hardware firewall and fast cable modem connection: this would have been impossible on dialup (and the clean install would have been compromised within 10 minutes without the firewall).

    After all of this, I had all 3 computers working fine, with up-to-date patches, virus protection, and an Ad Aware icon on the desktop. Also a lecture on the evils of spyware to the assembled daughters.

    I'll be back there in a month or 2, guaranteed. Let's hope for lots of snow next winter.

    1. Re:Joe Sixpack and TCO by hattig · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It seems that people install these things again and again because there is a slight feature in it that they like.

      So maybe a good solution is to find something legitimate that does that same task and install it for them.

      For example, there must be a legitimate application out there that does what Comet Cursor does without the spyware. Install Bittorrent and add shortcuts to various bittorrent sites - if they are going to download music, at least make it download music safely and usefully for other users. And so on.

      And as for corporate users ... anyone who manages a network that gets these problems should be sacked. Those machines are the company's, they should only be able to run approved applications. Yeah, give some leeway, allow IM, web and e-mail of course, allow reasonable customisation and personalisation, but don't allow local installation of software or plug-ins. If someone needs some software, let them ask IT with a valid reason for it.

    2. Re:Joe Sixpack and TCO by shrubya · · Score: 1

      All 3 of computers were unable to surf the web.
      [...]
      The 98SE box (yeah, I know) was completely hosed.


      Your obvious path to freedom is reformat 1 of the 3 (e.g. the 98) with Linux instead. If it's 99% for browsing and light office, they'll hardly notice the difference (except that it works better). The next year, switch the next one...

    3. Re:Joe Sixpack and TCO by flying_monkies · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you know you're going to be back, and you know how much it sucks to have to re-patch the box, maybe investing in an extra drive and something like Ghost for the machine would be worthwhile? You get the call, go over, throw your drive in, load the OS on the proper drive, patch it then ghost the sucker to the second drive, power down and pull the drive. Next time they call, you throw your drive back in, boot off a recovery disk and bring the system up to the point of the last clean install... Be sure to kick them out before you do it, stay locked in the room for 3 hours and scream profanitys profusely so they think you're really doing something.

      --
      I disagree with what you say, but I'll defend your right to say it to the death - Voltaire
    4. Re:Joe Sixpack and TCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's hope for lots of snow next winter. Why, so you can demonstrate the evils of pr0n and IRC to Joe Sixpack's assembled daughters while he's out clearing roads?

    5. Re:Joe Sixpack and TCO by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      Let's hope for lots of snow next winter.


      Or that his daughters are hot. Lack of snow requires a renegotiated deal.

      --
      -Styopa
    6. Re:Joe Sixpack and TCO by blahlemon · · Score: 2, Insightful
      What you need to do is add a hidden partition and ghost their computers to it. At least your re-builds would be less labourous.

      Unless you like hanging out with Joe Sixpack's teenage daughter.

      --
      It take more faith to believe in evolution than it takes to believe in God
    7. Re:Joe Sixpack and TCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they can't download their pirated music and retarded cursors.

  37. Quick question..... by Scrab · · Score: 1

    Is Spyware a problem that's limited to Windows OSes, or does Linux also suffer from it? I only ask because the adaware site doesnt appear to have any mention of it being supported in *nix, and I was wondering if that was a lack of support, or a lack of a market. Cheers

    --
    RoseColor red={0, 0xffff, 0x0000, 0x0000};VioletColour blue={0, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0xffff};find / -name *mybase*|chown you
  38. Microsoft Jab at Open Source Software by SuperficialRhyme · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I love how the Microsoft representative draws no line between open source software and free-closed source software with his comment "If something's free, there's often a catch." Furthermore the Microsoft and Dell reps both say that the best protection is to keep MSIE up to date. Too bad neither of them mentions mozilla or mozilla firefox. I wouldn't expect the microsoft rep to but I can't believe the article's author doesn't mention it.

    Then again - don't use mozilla - according to microsoft - if something's free, there's probably a catch. I bet its full of spyware right now. Just like those microsoft "Smart Tags" we read about yesterday.

  39. Is there a real solution? by manavendra · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Spybot removal software is one thing, but is there a real solution to this problem?

    User's will continue installing software they think is cool, or hear about from their friends/colleagues - be it bonzi buddy, kazaa or anything else. Pretty soon they'll start facing problems - the computer would begin to be unresponsive since kazaa is eating all the cpu, searches in google fail because IE is redirected to SearchScout, or whatever else you have/

    Cure is one thing, what's the prevention for all this? And I ask this, not for informed, knowledgeable users, but naive home users who don't know any better?

    No M$ bashing please. I have heard of several tools that keep track of what's installed and the changes to registry, but haven't come across anything will a simple interface and a "knowledge" of most common spyware (possibly updated frequently from a public server). Such a tool would at least make the customer support job easier!

    --
    http://efil.blogspot.com/
    1. Re:Is there a real solution? by david.given · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Cure is one thing, what's the prevention for all this? And I ask this, not for informed, knowledgeable users, but naive home users who don't know any better?

      There isn't one. I'm afraid it's that simple.

      The real villain is the computing model used. Windows (and Unix, and OS X) has a pretty simple security model: programs are either trusted, where they can run and use local resources, or they're not, in which case they can't.

      This means that in order for the user to execute ThisMayBeAGame that it's downloaded from some random web site, the user has to tell the OS to trust ThisMayBeAGame. At which point the user is screwed, because it's got no way of determining what ThisMayBeAGame is actually doing.

      ...and before you jump on me: yes, I know that all the operating systems I'm talking about support fine-grained access control. Unfortunately, it's only in some areas. Linux only supports it in the filesystem. You can restrict a process to be able to touch some files only, but you can't restrict it to being able to open sockets to certain addresses only or to use no more than X mips of CPU time. Window is even worse because most people (myself included) disable file system access control entirely because it's just too inconvenient; the default user can do anything. I don't know about OS X but since it's based on BSD I assume it's like Linux.

      ...and yes, I know that you can get high-security patches for some operating systems that do provide this sort of control, but they're not used.

      What's needed is a radically different computing model. Instead of a brittle system where all running software is trusted and you have prophylactic systems in place to distinguish between trusted software and untrusted software, you need a failsafe system where it simply doesn't matter if you run malicious code because it can't do any harm.

      Managed systems like .NET and Java are a step in the right direction but things need to go much further. Imagine a computing system where your desktop computer simply provides computing resources to a whole ecosystem of interacting software agents. Some of these you put there; some of them arrived as part of other people's documents; some just wandered in off the local network. Some of them may be helpful, some may be malicious. They're all managed by a high-level system that doles out system resources depending on what the user's doing. An agent that's attached to the screen gets more CPU time and real memory than one that's not. An agent that's resident on the machine's local storage gets storage space, an agent that's arrived from the network doesn't. A transient agent can only make network connections to a host if it can present proof that it actually has something to do with that host... and so on.

      Such a system would be far more resilient than the current ones. It would also work rather differently, but that's no bad thing. A lot of security issues would simply go away. Of course, there would be other problems that you wouldn't get with one of today's system --- notably, your software ecosystem would waste lots of resources --- but I think that's eminently affordable.

      Now, I suppose, all I have to do is to go away and write it...

    2. Re:Is there a real solution? by Redchrome · · Score: 1

      Only thing I can think of would be the ever-touted-but-never-perfected 'appliance' computer. Run the OS out of ROM, with *no* hooks for updates/patches or anything like that.

      If you want to patch it; you get a new chunk of ROM which upgrades the whole OS. (Put it in a PCMCIA-type package?)

      Allow the user to modify their own configuration via dotfiles in their home directory, Unix-style. This way:
      a. they only screw their own config up
      b. resetting the config to usable defaults is as simple as blowing away the .whatever file/directory.

      I think this will require a few more years of stabilization in the computing world, before code requires few enough updates (you still have to patch your browser occasionally...) that it's reasonable.

      Still, it's an attractive-enough goal that eventually someone will get the format & marketing right; and build a sustainable base of users. The ThinkNIC mostly just demonstrated that the user base isn't there yet.

    3. Re:Is there a real solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly I don't know of a free solution. Last I checked tho, AdAware's pay version had a spyware blocker that ran in the background and blocked spyware/adware from getting into your computer.

      Also replacing the hosts file with the one from http://everythingisnt.com/hosts.html will block many of the sites that spew this stuff out.

    4. Re:Is there a real solution? by Spoing · · Score: 1
      1. I have heard of several tools that keep track of what's installed and the changes to registry, but haven't come across anything will a simple interface and a "knowledge" of most common spyware (possibly updated frequently from a public server). Such a tool would at least make the customer support job easier!

      'Process not products.' If you are looking for a tool to solve the problem, you'll always be looking for another tool to solve yet another problem. Limit what dammage can be done using proper permissions and have a "white list" mentality; deny and/or remove everything unless it is actually needed and enable it with only the rights that are necessary.

      Target the needs not the program. If someone loads on a program that syncs the PC clock to an atomic clock -- and it also loads on spyware -- correct the 'clock problem' while removing the spyware. There will be less of an impulse to load the spyware the next time since the clock will be correct!

      This is something *nix folks have learned years ago.

      Windows users -- and admins -- must take the same attitude or they will be cleaning up this crap for years to come. No product will do this work for you without breaking something that is practical and useful (not spyware).

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    5. Re:Is there a real solution? by Spoing · · Score: 1
      One note: The OS has to support these limitations. It's much harder to "secure" Windows 98/ME/... since it doesn't have a non-administrator level.

      That said, removing and doing a 'wipe and reinstall' of some directories on boot might solve these problems even under the old-style Windows.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    6. Re:Is there a real solution? by jimand · · Score: 1

      Spybot S&D seems to know most of the spy stuff out there, and you can also lock your IE preferences (like your home page) and changes to your host file (to prevent the hijacking). Works for me, anyway.

    7. Re:Is there a real solution? by pjt33 · · Score: 1
      You can restrict a process to be able to touch some files only, but you can't restrict it to being able to open sockets to certain addresses only or to use no more than X mips of CPU time
      I don't know how to hard-limit the CPU usage, but nice/renice will keep a process from hogging the CPU.
    8. Re:Is there a real solution? by GlassUser · · Score: 1

      Yep. And I keep telling people, but they keep saying "well it doesn't do [security hole-"feature" here]". They simply don't want to learn how a computer is supposed to work. Basically, don't log on as administrator unless you have to do administrative stuff. But they like being able to install random trojans all day. Here's the rules I give to people though. Very very easy:

      1, don't log on as local administrator
      2, don't install anything unless it's an MSI file
      3, fix IE's default security permissions

      1. This is how computers are supposed to work. You should NEVER use a web browser in an administrative context. Windows even has a secondary logon service, so you don't have to even log on to the console to change things.
      2. You have no idea what setup.exe will do to your system. Most setup.exe files I see (and open source software/linux ports are the BIGGEST offenders here) are totally clueless about multiuser systems, and will put shortcuts in the current user's profile. Even worse, lots the programs themselves will expect full access to every file on the computer. Linux may work this way, but windows is a tad more secure.
      3. The default IE permissions are garbage. There's no reason to prompt users to download random executables from any web page that wants them to. Fix that. Toolbar integration is a nice tool, but nobody really uses it. Disable. ActiveX is easy to deal with. Just tell it not to download any activex controls. You can block potentially malicious ones from being run on web pages, but leave them available to the rest of the system.

      I have a script that will fix all of these in about two seconds. Most people don't like to use it though. I think the problem is that people like to feel important. They like to play the game, finding the right combination of obscure software to fix various problems (that they create themselves), the right incantations to utter, and the right voodoo to work.

    9. Re:Is there a real solution? by kasin · · Score: 1

      Process rights management. See Solaris 10. Basically you can give processes some root (or other) privs, without giving them full root privs. No more "this process runs as root so it can do , so if it gets compromised crackers have the permission to change root's password." Pretty cool.

    10. Re:Is there a real solution? by JCOTTON · · Score: 1

      Open up the Task Manager, and take a look at the 40 or 50 processes that are running in the background. Which ones do I want and need, and which ones are spyware or other viruses? I dont have a clue. What I need is a book or website that lists all of the Microsoft operating system Processes, what they do, and what I can delete. I am able to edit my registry and delete the bad guys, if I only knew who they are!

    11. Re:Is there a real solution? by coachvince · · Score: 0


      I'm the "computer guy" at a small private school. Other than a state grant each year, for items specifically for student use only, tech budget is on an as needed basis; as in "Do we absolutely need this to keep the lab open?"

      Parents, being consumers and usually unknowledgeable, want the PERCEIVED BEST for their children. They KNOW all decent PCs come with Windows, IE, and MS Office (although I have had some ask why we use Office, not Works like they have at home), so that's what they want us to have.

      Since our PCs are usually whatever our state-approved vendor sells at the lowest price with Windows (that's what our clients, the parents who pay to send their kids here, want), they don't always have the same version of Windows 2 years in a row. I have some minimal VB knowledge, and can make our own alternatives for some things (2 typing programs, a HOSTS file updater for banned sites, etc.). I work to find as much educational freeware/shareware as possible (BlockCad, CursorDance, Visual Pinball, West Point Bridge Designer, etc.), but I still have to address the basics.

      That means IE is on every desktop (though I don't do installs of Outlook/Express; Many parents don't understand why we don't give kids their own e-mail addresses at the schoool...); I would use another browser as well, but the educational/educational game sites our staff will actually use usually require an IE specific feature/Flash/Shockwave/etc.

      I've learned from my time here though- I use AdAware, Spybot, and a 803 Kb HOSTS file. I use Ghost, and make a standard image for each series of new machines. Then, during the summer, I refine 1 system from each of the groups to make it into the next year's Ghost image, and "restore" that to each machine in it's group.

      This has already saved me time. I back up student folders from each machine (many home-brewed freeware apps and cheap consumer level apps don't seem to support network folders readily), and restore to the new PC if the box dies.
      I know I accepted a lot putting myself at the mercy of a small budget, and consumers who are nearly all powerful, but it's worth it for the freedom of a fairly flexible lesson plan (just because Linux isn't the desktop OS on the PCs, doesn't mean the kids don't get to use LiveCds now and then). My students build their own personal websites in DreamWeaver MX(4th-8th), have played AdvanceMAME games, have used Macs (okay, my Quadra 800 just died; but it showed a bunch of kids how easy a PC can be to use), and a lot more. I like to think there can be a decent trade-off.

      Getting to the point (finally), my solution to user-installed spyware, etc is simple: anyone I catch clicking "YES" etc, using a floppy without virus-checking it, changing home pages, etc. has to use the Win98SE box in the back of the room. It doesn't have AdAware, SpyBot, etc. It has Bonzi Buddy, WeatherBug, and about a dozen others. That is the PC they use at the start of the next class, and must try to open up IE, run some apps, etc; most kids realize how much of a pain this stuff gets to be. If you let people see the difference side by side (or better yet, if they ask why your PC runs so much better than theirs when yours hasn't been replaced in the last 3 funding cycles), they sometimes will understand that all of this adds up very quickly.


      A+ Certified & potty-trained; equally proud of both

      --
    12. Re:Is there a real solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's one solution. Create a database of cryptographically-secure checksums of executables, DLLs, and other files that can contain runnable code (including interpreted code). Now have the operating system only run things that are marked as "OK" in that database. Put the database on the network, but with locally cached copies on every machine so that machines can run when the network is down.

      Now, whenever some new software comes out (like the newest version of Office for example), you scan the CD for checksums and add them to the database. Likewise for spyware, viruses, etc., except that you enter them into the database marked as a bad executable. Presto, the administrator has the ability to regulate what can and can't be run on various machines. If a program is discovered to have a serious security flaw, change its status to "bad" in the database. Unknown executables can be either allowed or disallowed; but if they are allowed, then when the user runs them, it will automatically notify the administrator so he can review them.

      This would not necessarily prevent every problem in every case, but it would allow the administrator to ensure that any given problem happens only once. In an organization with thousands of people, this should cut down the problems significantly.

    13. Re:Is there a real solution? by Dr.+Smeegee · · Score: 1

      Can you post an example of said script? It sounds pretty handy- and even if it doesn't fit everyone's needs, the "schooling" may help.

    14. Re:Is there a real solution? by GlassUser · · Score: 1

      http://www.jordanmills.com/prunev3.vbs will do number 3. The others aren't handy (they're part of my standard install).

      Needs a little more commenting, but if you're at all familiar with base apps and the registry, the effects are pretty obvious. I update it periodically.

      For point 1, it's a batch file. A couple of commands:
      net user user /add
      And then just log on as "user" instead.

      For point 2, I get in the registry, under clsid, msifile (or whatever is linked from the .msi type), and change the name of the "open" key to "runas". This triggers the secondary logon service to allow you to log on and run the MSI under alternate credentials. Basically, so someone just has to "run the msi and verify that you want to install it with the password"

    15. Re:Is there a real solution? by firew0lfz · · Score: 1

      Forgive my ignorance, but isn't that what Trusted Computing was supposed to be all about?

      http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=U TF -8&q=trusted+computing&btnG=Google+Search

      (No, I didn't look on the links, but I've heard bits and peices about it here and there; busy at the moment.)

      Mainly, TC would be about securing systems; though from the point of the Industry and not the Admins and Users, as far as I understand.

      --
      Try not to let life get in the way of living.
  40. You must be confused by The_reformant · · Score: 1

    You must be confused... Its VALUEware not spyware

    --
    I have discovered a truly remarkable sig which this post is too small to contain.
  41. Windows Live CD + favorite spyware prog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Dell should just provide users with a Windows Live CD that contains and anti-virus program and a spyware removal program.
    Pop it in, computer boots up, runs the anti-virus and spyware removal, shuts down.

    Then there is no hassle for the customer about them going to an internet site and installing a program, and then figuring out how to run it.

    1. Re:Windows Live CD + favorite spyware prog by Stevyn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or make it run off of linux. "The Live Linux to fix Windows CD"

    2. Re:Windows Live CD + favorite spyware prog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called the "system restore CD." =]

    3. Re:Windows Live CD + favorite spyware prog by Blahbbs · · Score: 1

      There is something like this. It's called Bart's PE. Putting Spybot on the CD is an option.

  42. People Are Stupid by Zapateria · · Score: 1

    A family friend was having trouble with their computer crashing and displaying pop-ups, so I went round and ran Ad-Aware for them. It found over 400 items of spyware! Turns out the idiot son had bought a CD off of Ebay that promised to give him access to "Exclusive Cheap WholeSale SiTeS!!!!11 BUY BUY BUY". They said their problems started about the same time as he installed it. I suggested they may have begun with his conception.

    1. Re:People Are Stupid by TykeClone · · Score: 1
      Don't brag until you remove more than 1000 times on the first run of AdAware. :)

      As near as I can tell, having teenagers in a house is directly proportional to the amount of spyware on a machine.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
  43. Spyware Overwhelms the Average User by SirChive · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In the last couple of months I've seen four or five computers that were rendered completely useless by spyware. The owners literally could not open their browser and get on the web.

    Many of the newer programs should not really be called "spyware". They are really a form of hijack-ware. They seize control of a users browser and send up an endless stream of ads.

    And no, the average user will never be able to cope with this. Most people just want to buy a computer and use it. They are no more interested in learning how to maintain a computer than they are in learning auto maintenance. It's up to the computer industry to deliver usable products to the end user.

    1. Re:Spyware Overwhelms the Average User by Fearless+Freep · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > They are no more interested in learning how to maintain a computer than they are in learning auto maintenance.

      Most drivers also have driver training, a driver's license, insurance, and know at least that the car needs gas and occasional maintenance

    2. Re:Spyware Overwhelms the Average User by avisdream · · Score: 1
      The other day, I caught my brother trying to use his computer by being bombarded by uncloseable pop-ups (well, "uncloseable" because there's no way he knows how to use ALT+F4). There was no way he could have possibly been able to visit websites. I've run Adaware and Spybot before, so he knew that I could fix it. He just didn't bother to ask.

      I guess he figured he'd only be able to use AIM and download mp3s from then on.

      You're right that the average user has no idea what's going on. I was a dorm computer assistant in college, and even a year ago, that was by far the biggest problem on campus.

      I've probably deleted hundreds of instances of spyware on my brother's computer and he STILL "doesn't know" how it got there. Short of educating everyone, MS has to release an "anti-Bonzi Buddy" patch or something, because it's gotten ridiculous.

    3. Re:Spyware Overwhelms the Average User by Fearless+Freep · · Score: 1

      > (well, "uncloseable" because there's no way he knows how to use ALT+F4).

      I use Windows at work and Linux at home...I manage at least once a day to hit "Alt-F4" and get a start as my screen blanks before I realize I just went to an "unused" desktop rather than closing an application

    4. Re:Spyware Overwhelms the Average User by thelexx · · Score: 1

      A computer is not as simple of a thing as a car, and never will be without being so severely crippled as to not actually be a general purpose machine anymore. That analogy is so old, tired and just plain wrong it's not even funny anymore. If a computer were any sort of vehicle it would be amphibious, have rockets, wings, a tractor-trailer hookup, a crane, a forklift, a bulldozer scoop and a complete sound stage and broadcast station in the back. Anyone attempting to operate one without any clue as to what the thing is capable of and how it works would rightly be considered a fool. The industry has oversold, overhyped and flat out lied about how easy and friendly computers are for much too long.

      --
      "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world." - Alan Greenspan, 1999
    5. Re:Spyware Overwhelms the Average User by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Loved your post... great mental image... until I got to the end!

      It's so sad, you seem to be recommending that all that power and ability ought to be restricted to the illuminati.

      No, you don't need to be a genius to use a computer. You just need a (bunch of) geniuses to DESIGN your computer.

      I guess it must be totally annoying to keep hearing this but, it's true: Mac OS X lives up to that promise.

      Cheers

    6. Re:Spyware Overwhelms the Average User by zerocool^ · · Score: 1


      I'm going to whine here.

      Is anyone else with me on this: Somehow, somewhere, they have taken our precious internet and completely screwed it up for the rest of us. Somewhere deep down inside, it actually hurts.

      It used to be so simple, so pure - a system based on trust, decentralized so that no one company or person could take it over, unregulated - free.

      It's just in about the past year that the internet , writ large, has become almost worthless. Yes, norton antivirus is good, so is ad aware, so is spybot, so is hijack this. But, there shouldn't be a need for those programs!

      staff@netmar.com has always gotten lots of spam (when you have your address on your website for ~10 years, and in newsgroups, too, it's going to get spam), but just in the past 8 months or so, the deluge has become almost intolerable. We've even installed spam assassin and mime defang, and it rejects about 1/2 the mail we get, and we're *still* getting more spam than ever.

      And I consider myself a power-user. I mean, I take precautions, I don't install comet cursor and all that crap. And I STILL get hit w/ spyware and crap.

      God, it sucks. It's almost enough to make me want to give up. I pretty much hate the internet now.

      Frustrated.

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
    7. Re:Spyware Overwhelms the Average User by R2.0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "And no, the average user will never be able to cope with this. Most people just want to buy a computer and use it. They are no more interested in learning how to maintain a computer than they are in learning auto maintenance. It's up to the computer industry to deliver usable products to the end user."

      Your analogy is close, but not quite. Regarding auto maintenance, you are right in that people don't want to learn how to do auto maintenance, bu most of them know that their cars NEED maintenance. So do computers, but the average computer users haven't realized this yet.

      A better way to use the analogy between cars and computers would be to ask users the following question: "Would you open the hood of your car and add or replace parts that you found out on the street for free? And if you did, and your car started running crappy, would you get pissed off at the dealer or the mechanic?"

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    8. Re:Spyware Overwhelms the Average User by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      Hogwash.

      1)The average computer system consists of about a dozen parts that are effectively unrepairable, i.e. replacement is the only feasible option: MB, processor, memory, cards, HD, CD/DVD, case, power supply, cooling fan, monitor, printer.

      A car has THOUSANDS of the equivalent level of parts. From the user standpoint, a processor is no different than a set of brake pads, no matter the level of complexity. Part fails, replace it or pay someone to do so.

      2) There are the multitude of things one can do with computers, but it's the same for cars; my car in high school was a transportation machine to an infinite variety of places, race car, vehicle for seduction (not a very good one), emergency bed/hotel room, ambulance, moving van, etc. All of which worked to some degree, with some level of problems. Sounds a lot like software.

      Here's the major difference - cars have had over 100 years to develop, and people have had the same amount of time to learn their use. Personal Computers - couple of decades, tops. Were doing the equivalent of driving Model T's and A's now. I don't think Henry Ford warned everyone about the multitude of ways cars could be a pain, and I'm glad he didn't.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  44. Don't run anything by nuggz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't understand the problem.

    My wife is relatively computer literate. But it comes down to a simple rule.

    Don't download anything, don't install anything. Ignore all those taskbars and toolbars and toys.

    we've had no trouble.

    1. Re:Don't run anything by NaugaHunter · · Score: 1

      Don't download anything, don't install anything. Ignore all those taskbars and toolbars and toys.

      Then why be online? Do you not use email or browse the web? Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face. Why not just set your machine up so it will catch problems? It's not like everything announces it will install something.

      I'm not saying those taskbars and whatnot make the world go round, but do you visit any sites at all? Do you think it's impossible for them to be redirected/infected?

      --
      R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
    2. Re:Don't run anything by Bogue · · Score: 1

      I don't understand the problem. My wife is relatively computer literate. But it comes down to a simple rule. Don't download anything, don't install anything. Ignore all those taskbars and toolbars and toys. we've had no trouble

      Does your wife sit in front of a computer 8-10 hours a day? Well people at my company do and 50-70 percent of the time they aren't doing any work. They are spending most of the time finding the end of the Internet. That's one thing about the web and work; if you want to slack you can because you're at your computer looking like you're working, but you're really surfing. Now if your wife can surf the web 20-30 hours a week 351 days a year without finding any spyware, well then she's not relatively computer literate.

    3. Re:Don't run anything by sootman · · Score: 1

      "Don't download anything, don't install anything. Ignore all those taskbars and toolbars and toys."

      Not being a dick, but seriously: what do you tell her when a system error pops up? Click OK? Close? C-A-D, kill process? Can she tell a real popup from a legitimate error message? How 'bout the "Update to QuickTime Pro" nag? Looks like a popup, behaves like a popup, comes up on your first visit to apple.com/trailers.

      That's my biggest problem--*I* know a real message from a fake, which warnings you click "OK" to and which really matter, which free software is good (google toolbar) and which isn't (most others) but sooooo many people don't, and you nearly need to spend all of your time to keep up on these things--fine if you're a geek, not fine if you aren't.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  45. Microsoft: Free Software = Spyware by xend · · Score: 1

    from the article: Finally, Friedberg cautions Internet users to pay extra attention to offers of free software. "Be suspicious," he said. "When something's free, there's likely a catch." I especially like the "When something's free, there's likely a catch". Ahh, the subleties of FUD.

    --
    "Sigs mentioning ducks were considered particularly funny."
  46. Look who's talking... by aixguru1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "A separate study by Internet service provider EarthLink found more than 29 million spyware-related files on the 1 million computers the company tested."

    Earthlink uses those types of data mineing files in their total access software. When I run spybot and Ad-ware, it constantly finds the files tied in with earthlink for advertising.

    Not to mention AIM now has pop up advertising and things. I am glad that I don't have to use my windows machine for anything more than audio processing for the most part. I couldn't imagine what it would be like if I used it to browse the web regularly...

    --
    root 10956 5164 0 Oct 22 - 0:23 sendmail: rejecting connections: load average: 70 (isn't sendmail just too kind)
  47. the best solution that takes atmost 1 hour by KrisCowboy · · Score: 1

    One word - Linux. Been using it for 2 years now. No spyware, no virus/worms/trojans, no shit!!! If you use your computer just to browse net and/or for porn, switch to linux today. Sure it take a couple of hours to know your way around it, but believe me,once you get the damn thing running, there is no looking back. Forget windows, it's for kids and lamers.

    1. Re:the best solution that takes atmost 1 hour by KrisCowboy · · Score: 1

      Why? Just because you are unable to install Linux and make it run? Because you are a poor sod stuck with windows and suffering from spyware, unwanted pop-ups, free viruses, gift trojans and applications that crash your box 3 times an hours? Wake up dude. It's the best cost-effective solution. I'd rather spend a couple of hours installing linux than spending both time and money to install 'patches'.

  48. Re:You can update AdAware! by bach37 · · Score: 1

    You can update adaware inside the program to dl a list the most recent nasties.

  49. Best line from the article by bavander · · Score: 1

    "When something's free, there's likely a catch."

    Yea, like my linux laptop not having one piece of spyware in 3 years.

  50. Dell's lucky by spidergoat2 · · Score: 1

    I upgraded all the computers in my company to new Dell PC's 6 months ago. Virtually all of the software and hardware problems I used to have are gone. Now, 30-40 percent of problem calls I get are related to spyware. Is there someone I can send a bill to?

  51. legalese by acceber · · Score: 1
    Although Kazaa's licensing agreement is clear about the existence and intent of each of these programs, critics say consumers rarely take the time to pore over the legalese in licensing agreements before installing new software. Attaching all sorts of extra programs to a piece of unrelated software abuses the consumer's trust, the critics charge.
    This would probably be the number one reason why spyware is so easily transmitted onto computers. When downloading or installing a program, chances are the consumers are in a rush to do their work and want the "paperwork" quickly dealt with, so it's only skimmed. Therefore, they miss the spyware information hidden in the the legalese.

    Of course this is the fault of the consumers but over time its become a deceptive trade practice as those responsible for the programs know that legal jargon only succeeds in confusing the average user. Many would probably regard it as an abuse of the system.

  52. $py ware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recently met a guy that wrote some spyware that he has been improving and so on for many years for windows platforms.

    He uses the information gathered to write big reports and sell them to large companies. I was interested in what sort of information the guy was gathering. He gave me a brief description of web pages viewed, banks used, ages, general usage, and the spyware he wrote even logs when the systems not online for those dialup users. The information is then sold to companies so that they can identify what thier market is better.

    He claims its 100% legal because they agree when installing "icons" or something like that..

    sly...and not something i would admit to in certain crowds..

  53. Re:You can update AdAware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A long while back AdAware wasn't being updated at all. They've resumed work on it ages ago.

  54. MS Subtle shot at the Free Software Movement? by jonasmit · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Finally, Friedberg [from Microsoft] cautions Internet users to pay extra attention to offers of free software. "Be suspicious," he said. "When something's free, there's likely a catch."

    I worry that ordinary users will associate the free software work done in the Linux/BSD community with spyware - or more likely that MS will turn up the rhetoric against the Linux/BSD community when the competition gets hot in the desktop space.

    1. Re:MS Subtle shot at the Free Software Movement? by markan18 · · Score: 1

      Typical MS bullshit. Windows itself is a spyware. Various windows components send loads of info back to home. Just think of internet explorer, windows media player and windows update.

      Its easy to see when data is transmitted, just install ethereal or any other packet sniffer. You may see what is transmitted but sometimes it is encrypted.

      Many commercial software also phones home like adobe acrobat, winamp and any software that uses compulsory registration. Even my deskjet 610 drivers contains registration nagware that transmit data back to HP, i had to manually edit the registry to get rid of it.

      I soon realized that the only two ways i could live without being spied upon is using only open source software or disconnect from the internet. I use OpenBSD's ssh authenticating gateway to prevent my windows computer from reaching the internet. Windows does not provide any ssh client so it cannot try to bruteforce my password

    2. Re:MS Subtle shot at the Free Software Movement? by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      Windows does not provide any ssh client so it cannot try to bruteforce my password

      Oh, come on. You mean with the level of paranoia you display here, you haven't considered the possibility Windows *does* have an SSH client trying to brute force your password, it's just buried in a DLL somewhere ?

  55. Look2Me is the worst one by vasqzr · · Score: 1


    Search Bars, Bonzi Buddy...those aren't a big deal to remove. The browser hijackers are the worst.

    I support about 60 users in two offices, and about 20 users in remote offices, and my biggest problems are Spyware, viruses, and Trojans. Anti-virus software (on the PC's I manage in the office) takes care of almost all viruses, but spyware and shit is harder to stop.

    The best thing you can do is have your users setup as 'users' instead of 'power users' (if you can). I'd have everyone on Mozilla but 2 of our ASP's -require- IE.

    Look2Me is the worst one, walking someone through that removal over the phone isn't my idea of fun.

  56. It will never topple the #1 tech support problem by artemis67 · · Score: 1

    ...clueless users.

  57. And even better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is reading this on a Windows box that has never had any spyware.

    Or Viruses for that matter.

  58. Do what I do .... by phoxix · · Score: 0

    Tell people they need to buy a Mac.

    When they ask why "why?" ... I tell them it has all the good apps, etc, and it doesn't have spyware. Everything else I tell them doesn't matter, just the spyware part really gets to them.

    Sunny Dubey

  59. Odd... money to be made isnt being made? by Serapth · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There is one thing I cant figure out here. Spyware is the next big thing after virii... why havent the big anti virus companies gotten in on the action? I mean, how much more work would it take a McAffe or Symantec to add spyware detection tools and removal software to their current products? If you think about it, the only big thing that distinguishes one AV company from another is there response times to a new virus. Wouldnt this be a very sellable feature?

    On the bright side, the big kids staying out of it, allows little guys the like LavaSoft ( ad-aware ), to carve a niche for themselves. However, in a lavasoft type company gets smart and offers virus removal in their tool aswell... why would you not get the do it all tool, instead of two pieces of software?

    Its always funny watching big commerical companies miss the boat on stuff like this though :)

    Also, I may be wrong, their may be an AntiVirus product out there that deals with SpyWare. If there is, please let me know!

    1. Re:Odd... money to be made isnt being made? by Have+Blue · · Score: 4, Informative

      Possibly because encouraging companies to uninstall each other's software is a dangerous precedent. Who's in charge of deciding what's spyware? And it would be easy to slippery-slope one's way into a situation where Windows or BIOSes would only run code signed by a central authority.

    2. Re:Odd... money to be made isnt being made? by miffo.swe · · Score: 1

      Sophos had this feature before and i loved it tremendously. Strangely they have removed it, go figure? Maybe some spyware company threated to sue in the US and they backed off instead of go through stiff legal battles?

      How i love the US legal system, not!

      --
      HTTP/1.1 400
    3. Re:Odd... money to be made isnt being made? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do people draw a distinction between the two. Spyware IS a trojan virus. Your virus scanner should be stopping this before it even gets a chance to install.

    4. Re:Odd... money to be made isnt being made? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was just thinking about what you said, but then it occurred to me:

      Isn't there a legal difference between uninstalling software with a user's consent, and uninstalling software without consent?

      I would think that allowing software to uninstall other software with the user's consent wouldn't set a precident to allow software to uninstall software without consent.

    5. Re:Odd... money to be made isnt being made? by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I also thought about that many times.

      In the past 12 months I've never got close to having my Windows system infected (didn't open weird email attachments and I get few MS Office documents which get scanned before being open anyway) but I've been having constant problems with spyware.

      I have Search and Destroy, AdAware and usually a commercial spyware program on a 30 day trial. I set S & D to protect my system files and control programs that start automatically and I run a system scan using each of the three packages at least once a week.

      Goddamn spyware scum. I wish it was possible to attack, not only to defend myself.

    6. Re:Odd... money to be made isnt being made? by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      uhh McAfee does.

      http://us.mcafee.com/root/package.asp?pkgid=182& ci d=9904

      It's supposed to detect it, but I don't know anyone using it yet.

    7. Re:Odd... money to be made isnt being made? by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 1

      I may be wrong, their may be an AntiVirus product out there that deals with SpyWare. If there is, please let me know!

      Norton AV 2004 has integrated spyware detection. Works pretty well, it detects spyware inside archives which Spybot S&D doesn't. It is bloatware though, and of course you have to pay for a license and the subscription for updated definitions.

    8. Re:Odd... money to be made isnt being made? by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      The easy answer is that if it doesn't uninstall easily, or if it just comes back upon reboot, it's either spyware or a virus - either way it should be killed.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    9. Re:Odd... money to be made isnt being made? by chooks · · Score: 1

      The easy answer is that if it doesn't uninstall easily, or if it just comes back upon reboot, it's either spyware or a virus - either way it should be killed

      Conversely, if it doesn't install easy and causes your machine to reboot, it's Windows (and should still be killed).

      --
      -- The Genesis project? What's that?
    10. Re:Odd... money to be made isnt being made? by shaitand · · Score: 1

      "And it would be easy to slippery-slope one's way into a situation where Windows or BIOSes would only run code signed by a central authority"

      yeah because that's not where we are going as is after all.

    11. Re:Odd... money to be made isnt being made? by Trifthen · · Score: 1

      So, if a legit company makes an actual bona-fide virus that benefits them in some obscure way, no virus removal program can touch it?

      Oh, I get it now:

      Joe random hacker makes virus == bad.
      Company makes virus == good.

      I see the difference now! Never mind.

      --
      Read: Rabbit Rue - Free serial nove
    12. Re:Odd... money to be made isnt being made? by Hippocrates · · Score: 1

      Norton Antivirus already DOES detect Adware, most all of it. In fact, it gives you steps to remove it if it does detect it.

    13. Re:Odd... money to be made isnt being made? by The+Taco+Prophet · · Score: 1
      Maybe they're wising up to it. A friend of mine was having a hell of a time with a lovely piece of spyware her husband had installed. Ad-Aware and Spybot wouldn't touch it. I found instructions for getting rid of it by hand on symantec's site. Fortunately, she's fairly geeky herself and more than capable of performing the regedits necessary without hosing her machine :)

      Would be nice if ol' Norton would start picking these things up as part of the normally scheduled virus scan...

    14. Re:Odd... money to be made isnt being made? by youngec · · Score: 1

      McAfee (for over a year) and Symantec (last month) ARE detecting spyware/adware in their Corporate products. Where have you been? Still running software from more than a year ago? Now THAT is the fault of too many people. Too many people have the "Ain't broke, don't fix it" mentality, and then they get hit by these kinds of things (security vulnerabilities, spyware/adware, etc).

  60. It's a nightmare by Electric+Eye · · Score: 1

    I had a client of mine at a medical office two weeks ago who was having problems with an onslaught of uncontrollable pop-ups. I downloaded two popular spyware removal programs and I just could not believe the amount of SHIT that has been secretly installed on these PCs. Man, I'm so happy I own Macs.
    It took me a couple of hours just to clear out all of the spyware programs and files fromboth computers. One of them had nearly 200 files/programs that had been installed, not by the user.

    To all you fuckers who create this malware, I hope you all die horrible, slow deaths. Really. You are scum.

  61. Centrally managed network enabled spyware removal? by D4MO · · Score: 1

    The problem with AdAware, Spybot etc is that they are clients that must be installed on individual windows machines. Does anyone know of a tool, like Symantac AV Corp, that has a central admin console, quarantine and auto updates clients etc? Even better, a tool that doesn't require a client and can remote scan, through administrative shares or something?

    --

    Rocket science is easy. Neurosurgery, now *that's* difficult.
  62. STOP RUNNING AS ADMIN! by dioscaido · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'd say 75% of spyware issues come from users running as part of the Administrator group. All day-to-day use windows accounts should be a regular user, with the least priviledges as possible. Without being part of the Admin group, the spyware would not be able to write to HKLM registry, C:\ or C:\WINDOWS. Some spyware could still infect the user's directory, but at least a simple re-log on to Administrator could be done to clean up the machine.

    1. Re:STOP RUNNING AS ADMIN! by jonasmit · · Score: 1, Informative

      Agreed.
      It seems to me thought that MS and many software vendors haven't figured out the multi-user idea though. There is no superuser concept to get rights to install something without logging out. Some software doesn't run happily on the standard limited user privs so people take the lazy route.

    2. Re:STOP RUNNING AS ADMIN! by dioscaido · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Windows has the "Run As..." capability (right click any app, select Run As... and enter the administrator account), so that somewhat simulates doing a 'su' in linux.

      But I totally agree that many application developers don't understand the concept of running at the least priviledge necessary. So many apps write their config to C:\Program File\APP\ and HKLM, which requires elevated access, instead of writing to C:\Documents and Settings\user\Local Settings and HKLU. Hopefully more people will read 'Writing Secure Code' (from MS, ironically), and windows apps will improve.

    3. Re:STOP RUNNING AS ADMIN! by b0bby · · Score: 1

      That's a great idea. Unhappily, some places are stuck with a major piece of software which requires that the user have admin rights (oh, and for good measure, that Word macro protection is turned off). Our business runs on this software, there are no reasonable alternatives, and so we all run as admin. The user's group tries to pressure the vendor into doing the right thing, but they'd rather add bells & whistles than improve the core functionality.

    4. Re:STOP RUNNING AS ADMIN! by moexu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I tried that when I upgraded from 98 to 2000 at home. I set up a regular account that had as few priviledges as possible for day to day work and an administrator account for everything else. I lasted about a day and a half before I changed my account to have administrative access.

      Nothing worked properly. I would get all sorts of weird access denied errors for things that shouldn't have required administrative access to begin with (like changing default settings in Word). I had to log off the machine and log back on as administrator to install games. When I tried to play them under my user account it would prompt for the administrator password.

      I don't think that users running as administrators is the fundamental problem. The fault lies with software developers who don't write software under the theory of least priviledge and with Microsoft for designing their OS so that gaining superuser access for administrative tasks is so awkward.

      --
      "Seek first to understand." - Socrates
    5. Re:STOP RUNNING AS ADMIN! by Tin+Foil+Hat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While that is a good suggestion, it's also very annoying. If I run as a regular user and want to install something, I have to actually log out, log back in as Administrator, install the software, log out, and then log back in under the normal account.

      Why can't Windows just prompt for the Administator password when I want to install something? Not offering that practically ensures that almost nobody will use the normal user settings. It simply makes it too difficult to install software.

      Talk about stupidity....

      YARTHMS.
      (Yet Another Reason to Hate Microsoft)

      --
      No matter how many of my rights are taken away, somehow I still don't feel safe. -Frigid Monkey
    6. Re:STOP RUNNING AS ADMIN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about people start writing Windows apps that don't require admin. No real reason that apps like quicken and turboTax require admin priv to just run. I spent a lot of time tracking quicken down to tweak file perms, mostly works as a user now, but once you update stock prices it deletes one of its files and recreates it. But it can't because it is in the windows directory. Try to talk to tech support about it. What a waste of time.

    7. Re:STOP RUNNING AS ADMIN! by kabocox · · Score: 1

      Yes, but then 75% of Win98 and WinXP games will not run as a regular user. They demand admin access. Does regular user care. Nope, he wants to play his game. Why should he be restricted from his own machine? I know the reasons myself. Try convincing him of that though.

    8. Re:STOP RUNNING AS ADMIN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really have to echo this. NO ONE, and this means *YOU*, should regularly run as administrator or power user. It's like running as root all the time in 'nix. Crazy. Any computer I administer (personal, family, ~100 work) all have the users running as restricted users with few exceptions. That coupled with moz, hardware firewall, regular patch scheduling, and strigent email filtering, has made for virtually no problems (and we don't generally run av software either).

    9. Re:STOP RUNNING AS ADMIN! by Wedge1212 · · Score: 1

      it would be nice and all. But there are some programs out there that will just not run under a user account. Hell they wont even run under power-user. As a network admin it really pisses me off. For example. the most recent version of Quickbooks requires a user level of admin or power-user to run the program. So I have to setup each user who works with Quickbooks as an Admin on their local machine. I went with admin because a few legacy programs we run just simply will not operate under anything less than a admin account. Of course this opens the door for a pile of spyware. I have installed Ad-aware on every single computer in my office and taught everyone how to use it. Have they? No! The simple solution is to call me and click three buttons and tell them to take a coffee break while thier computer is scanned. aaaaaahhhh!!!!

      --
      See Sig! See Sig Zig! Zig Sig Zig!!!!!
    10. Re:STOP RUNNING AS ADMIN! by rasqual · · Score: 1

      You don't need to set up users as admins. Quickbooks needs the Intuit keys opened in the registry; that's well known. For such software, the first thing you should do is open the Intuit folders and keys for security groups whose members will be using the application. In fact, this is the whole point of access control. One could argue that Intuit's approach is *good* security. I've been irritated enough by this myself, though, that I won't be the one to make the argument. ;-)

    11. Re:STOP RUNNING AS ADMIN! by sybarite · · Score: 1

      I can tell you from experience that I have seen spyware install itself into HKLM when the users are not local administrators. The spyware software in this case must have been exploiting a flaw or buffer overflow to get itself installed.

    12. Re:STOP RUNNING AS ADMIN! by Wedge1212 · · Score: 1

      Interesting...you learn something new every day. Didnt really think of it that way.

      --
      See Sig! See Sig Zig! Zig Sig Zig!!!!!
    13. Re:STOP RUNNING AS ADMIN! by jonasmit · · Score: 1

      This would be a great improvement but without MAC (Mandatory Access Control) these spyware/trojans would still be a problem. As soon as admin rights are exercised (run as or whatever) you've got a spyware/trojan that runs as an administrator now and can still re-install or hide itself as it wishes. right? So you still need App firewalls and vigilant monitoring... BTW. I'm no Windows programmer ;)

    14. Re:STOP RUNNING AS ADMIN! by omicronish · · Score: 1

      Windows has the "Run As..." capability (right click any app, select Run As... and enter the administrator account), so that somewhat simulates doing a 'su' in linux.

      This can also be accomplished via 'runas' at the command-line. Example: runas /user:Administrator cmd.exe

      But I totally agree that many application developers don't understand the concept of running at the least priviledge necessary. So many apps write their config to C:\Program File\APP\ and HKLM, which requires elevated access, instead of writing to C:\Documents and Settings\user\Local Settings and HKLU

      I think I remember reading somewhere that Longhorn will transparently provide separate Program Files directories for such bad applications.

  63. No all it takes is a mac by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    naw just buy a mac. not that they are immune in any sense but for some reason they dont seem infested either. put that in your TCO and smoke it.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  64. Definatly the biggest growing problem... by Ignatius_VI · · Score: 1

    I work on a campus, and spyware is the cause of 90% of the calls. The problem is the average user simply does not know what spyware is, or how to get rid of it. They click yes to every yes/no installer popup, and eventually there's so much crap the computer is so slow it's unusable.

    What it comes down to is the average user does not know what they're doing. If they knew installing all kinds of stuff would cause problems, they most likely wouldn't do it.

    It usually just takes running SpyBot, but beyond that, it takes some education since even "legit" "products" from companies seem to be worse than viruses when installed in mass amounts...

  65. I agree! by Phidoux · · Score: 1

    These damn "My Search" people are a curse! If you try to uninstall their stuff on a Windows machine, all it does is remove the uninstall entry in the registry but actually leaves the software running. It took me hours a few nights ago to get their junk off my PC. My Search is a front-end to Google and a number of other search engines. I've no idea why Google (and the other's) allow My Search to do the things they do.

  66. Just stop using IE, and perhaps even Windows by pyite69 · · Score: 1

    What will it take for people to use an alternative
    like Mozilla, which cuts back on the spying; or to
    give up on Windows altogether?

  67. MOD PARENT UP!! by holy_smoke · · Score: 0

    Excellent analogy.

    --
    Is the juice worth the sqeeze?
  68. Who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because Windows is spyware itself. The media player and various other programs are notorious homephoners.

  69. There is a rather simple fix by SilentChris · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Permissions are you friend. We had a spyware/virus situation in our office until we instituted a new policy: no one has install permissions. You want to install stuff, come to us. You can download all the crap you want, you just can't install it. Complaints will get filed in the circular bin.

    We coupled XP permissions, SUS (godsend, that thing) and NAV Corporate. NAV updates everyone's definitions as soon as they come out. SUS sends out updates nightly (usually a few days pass after they're issued by MS so we can test and approve them). Firewall keeps dump RPC requests out.

    Since then: no viruses, no spyware. Time taken to set up all of the pieces: a few days. Money spent: XP licenses came with new machines, NAV cost a couple grand, SUS was free. Time and frustration saved: priceless.

    1. Re:There is a rather simple fix by sesaetaen · · Score: 2, Informative

      Time spent installing each and every application for your lusers: ???

      Constricting your average user's permissions that way is what makes people try to circumvent security, which in the end can be even more troublesome than cleaning out spyware.
      (I know I would)

    2. Re:There is a rather simple fix by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Which is where the termination policy comes into play.

      When I was first hired at Sony they explained their policy on this. They calmly explained that they KNOW there are people in this group who could get around their security, and they explained that doing so will result in immediate termination, even it's for something as simple as a screensaver (they blocked screensaver installation because an employee had made a scrolling "I QUIT!!!" marquee).

    3. Re:There is a rather simple fix by LqqkOut · · Score: 1

      Instead of replying to this and saying "damn, it must take forever to install software for users" I'd like to ask: Once you determined a base set of applications for each set of users, were there many special cases? and how much time did it take to address those cases?

      --

      -- In Soviet Russia, radio listens to YOU!

    4. Re:There is a rather simple fix by SilentChris · · Score: 1

      Time spent was a one-time deal: set up the apps they need on the source machine and push it out through Ghost. If another app needs to be installed company-wide, use Group Policy (or any other number of methods).

      All the users really want is to access the internet anyway. If they want to install stuff like AIM, too bad.

    5. Re:There is a rather simple fix by SilentChris · · Score: 1

      No, it doesn't take long, because you carefully craft a source image that has the company apps and push it out once. A new app need to be installed (or an old app upgraded)? Group Policy, or any number of methods.

    6. Re:There is a rather simple fix by Dog135 · · Score: 1

      Until you run into someone like me that runs Knoppix more often then not.

      But then again, you can't exactly infect Knoppix, now can you?

      --
      "That's so plausible, I can't believe it!" - Leela
    7. Re:There is a rather simple fix by SilentChris · · Score: 1

      What the hell are you talking about? Since when is spyware considered an "infection"? Since when does Knoppix have enough marketshare to merit spyware. Please don't talk if you have no clue what you're talking about.

    8. Re:There is a rather simple fix by Dog135 · · Score: 1

      Did you even read the parent of my post? He was talking about locking down the system at his work by installing XP. I was referring to getting around the security at work by running off of Knoppix to get full access to the HD.

      And yes, the second point of my post was that even though I can get around his security, I'm not a security danger since viruses, which he mentions in his post, can't infect Knoppix.

      If you're going to reply to a post, make sure you read it in context first. Otherwise, it just makes you look like an idiot.

      --
      "That's so plausible, I can't believe it!" - Leela
  70. Hotbar hotblows! by thebra · · Score: 1

    I have had the most problems with removing Hotbar. It tries to install every time Outlook is run. It pretends to uninstall from add/remove programs, but is back next time you try to load Outlook. I hate it! I want to sue the people who make that crap software.

    1. Re:Hotbar hotblows! by jenns · · Score: 1
      They do make Hotbar removal tools that will help you with this...

      We have it run automatically on users' machines if it locates certain files.

      --
      Whatever women do they must do twice as well as men to be thought half as good. Luckily this is not difficult. -Whitton
  71. Difference between MalWare and Virus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been wondering why companies like Symantec and McAffee don't step up to the plate on these things. It's getting to the point where the distinction between spyware/malwhere and a virus is pretty minor. I've seen spyware that copies files and registry entries to your computer, and then damages the permissions and such so that you can't remove them (even AdAware and Spybot can't because the system won't let you remove the files/entries AT ALL). But still they're "spyware" and not a "virus".

    It seems like someone really needs to offer an enterprise level solution with centralized pushed updates and such, and I get the feeling that if current antivirus software providers don't get moving, they may find the anti-spyware people have incorporated antivirus software, and pushed them out.

  72. We should be promoting real-time spyware blocking by will0957 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I work at an ISP and we get a fair amount of calls pertaining to spyware/adware. "As soon as I connect to your service I have all these ads coming up on my screen!" "I keep changing my home page but then it goes back to this porn site!" All that we are supposed to support is getting people connected to the internet and setting up their e-mail.. so they always get upset. I personally prefer SpyBot, but management tells us to recommend Ad-Aware. The best is when they call up because Ad-Aware didn't fix the problem. "Now what?!". CWShredder can be pretty useful in these situations.. For your own personal machine I recommend SpyBlocker. It isn't free anymore, but it's worth the money to buy it. It's a real-time ad/spyware/bug/cookie filter. It works quite well.

  73. Spamware removal sites by Krafty+Koder · · Score: 2, Funny


    i happened to come across these fantastic spyware removal sites. if you download their software you are guaranteed 100 per cent no more spyware
    Debian
    Mandrake
    Linspire
    Fedora
    Mepis
    Xandros
    Suse
    Slackware
    Gentoo

  74. Windows at Work, OS X at Home by xirtam_work · · Score: 1
    I had to clean this crap of all the computers at work all the time. Now I ahve told everyone not to install *anything* without consulting with me, even the CEO & Chairman.

    However, the CEO & Chairman keep bringing their laptops and home computers in because they, or their kids keep putting crap on them. It's pretty impossible for me to refuse to clean them. No other employees seem to have this problem at work any more.

    I use OS X at home and keep telling them that I don't worry about viruses and have never had any spyware. Funny thing is, they're willing to switch, but are worried about the cost! I keep telling them how much they're paying me to sort out the stuff constantly, but the message isn't getting through... Oh well.

  75. Let's just call Spyware what it is. by hal2814 · · Score: 1

    Q: What do you call a program that you do not want installed that runs anyways, is hard to remove, and notably degrades the performance of you machine?

    A: They're frickin viruses. I guess technically they might be considered trojans, worms, etc, but they should be the in the realm of virus and they should be treated as such both socially and legally.

    I can see the argument that some software requires such spyware to run and therefore that spyware is not a virus, but if that is the case then the spyware should be uninstalled with the offending program. If not, the company producing said spyware should be handled legally the same way as a person introducing a computer virus, trojan, worm, etc into the wild.

  76. Simple Answer for the Wife's computer by Displaced+Cajun · · Score: 2, Interesting

    She's running windows 2000, and logs in as a USER.

    I've got Admin rights to her computer. When she needs a game installed, I install it. But limiting her to user rights, she doesn't have to proper access to install ANYTHING.

    This works for me.

    --
    Executive ability is deciding quickly and getting someone else to do the work. --John G. Pollard
    1. Re:Simple Answer for the Wife's computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      This probably helps hide your own tracks browsing those midget snuffpr0n sites as well. Crafty dog...

    2. Re:Simple Answer for the Wife's computer by Derkec · · Score: 1

      My wife resents those sorts of harsh rules they have on her box at work. I'd rather do some tech support at home every now and again and have her happy that I give her free reign to control her own computer. Heck, I let her do pretty much whatever she wants to our laptop as well even though I occassionally use it for business. Since its mostly used to surf the internet from the living room, I don't really care. I just pay attention for when I'll be travelling and quietly make the laptop dissapear for a day or two before my trip so that I won't have any surprises.

      It's just not that hard.

  77. Presentation by Perdurabo26 · · Score: 1

    Don't mean to tout my own horn here, but i just finished a presentation about spyware to the Clawson Rotary club a couple of days ago. You can find the doc at http://www.exiant.net/doc/spyware.pdf . If anyone ever has to give a presentation about it, you can find some good info on there, free for all.
    Enjoy.
    --

    --
    I will endure to the end.
  78. CWshredder by jrwillis · · Score: 3, Informative

    CWshredder does tend to work REALLY well on that hard to get adware/malware. It's like I was complaining to a co-worker the other day, I don't feel like a Network Tech as much as a bloody computer janitor now.

    --
    Keep Austin Weird!
  79. I tried "foramt C:"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and nothing happened.

  80. Biggest problem is IE plugin structure by StandardCell · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The default settings in Internet Explorer are one of the biggest causes of spyware insertion. The problem is that spyware on a page causes IE to come up with a message window that says "Would you like to install FREE toolbar from foo.bar?" and then at the bottom it says something about a security certificate.

    Well, as you all know, anyone can go to Verisign and buy a certificate for authentication purposes, but most people take certificates to mean that it's certified safe software. For the uninformed user, there's little difference between this and the latest Macromedia Flash plug-in.

    Even worse, there are a lot of sites that cause Internet Explorer to go into a loop with the plug-in. By that I mean:

    1. Plugin for "FREE SphyWhere Inc. ToolBar Search!" presents itself to user.
    2. User presses "No" button or the close window button to avoid installation.
    3. IE comes back with a dialog that says "You MUST install free toolbar to gain access!" and then has to click the "Ok" button or the close window button on THAT dialog.
    4. Process repeats itself at Step 1 and continues in perpetuity unless the user is fast enough to be able to close the actual browser window before the plugin pops up, or until the user consents, or unless the user shuts down Internet Explorer.

    This occurs primarily on porn sites, but it will occur many times on legitimate sites (e.g. VG-Network, formerly Dave's Video Game Classics for classic games and one of the music lyric sites (can't remember which off the top of my head).

    The root of the problem here is that - surprise - Microsoft has continued to let websites exploit this peculiarity in its browser. The end result is that users get frustrated and either inadvertently or out of frustration simply allow the spyware to be installed. Even worse, if the user is dumb enough to have "Low" set on their security settings due to their own inability or unwillingness to learn about basic browser functionality, all this spyware will get installed automatically. Some users I believe continually complain about their computer being slow to the point where they're prompted to upgrade unnecessarily because of spyware they don't know that they have.

    So...on every fresh Windows install I do, I do it behind a NAT router to begin with, install all service packs and security updates and drivers, then put a software firewall on the computer, then an antivirus app with Trojan detection, and finally a spyware removal app. Then I instruct people to go to Windows Update every day, their virus update every day, and Spyware check every week.

    Isn't spyware fun?

    1. Re:Biggest problem is IE plugin structure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "...Process repeats itself at Step 1 and continues in perpetuity unless the user is fast enough to be able to close the actual browser window before the plugin pops up, or until the user consents, or unless the user shuts down Internet Explorer."
      It appears that Microsoft is addressing this problem. [Hat tip to "jgraham" posting on this thread.
    2. Re:Biggest problem is IE plugin structure by lucas+teh+geek · · Score: 0

      Then I instruct people to go to Windows Update every day, their virus update every day, and Spyware check every week.
      90% of lusers would keep that up for about 3 days, then forget about it. you need to make all of that automated. Automatic windows update, automatic virus def updates and scheduled spyware scans.

      --
      TIAEAE!
  81. Serious Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This is a serious problem where I work. Users have been set as Administrators on their own boxes to ease the burden on Tech Support when the user needs work related software installed. The user can then install that software themselves. Users have also grown accustomed to the freedom they have on their PCs to install their favorite chat client, media player, or screen savers.

    The problem is that this has left non-technical users wide open to the unethical practices of crappy programmers who create spyware and/or allow it to be bundled with legitimate applications. Then the users complain that we in the Development group made a horribly slow program and we need to fix it. We then run Ad-aware on their box and remove Hotbar, Weather Bug, etc from their box. As if by magic the applications are fast again (shocking!). We're currently working with our Tech Support staff to image the user community's computers as Restricted Users. The stuff is going to hit the fan when they discover they cannot install anything without IS approval.

  82. Nip it in the bud by WebGangsta · · Score: 3, Insightful
    As others have said, the biggest issue that we have to deal with isn't the spyware itself, but the end-users who "just have to have" whatever the associated programs are. And these programs don't just slow their computers down, it also affects the network by adding unnecessary traffic to the pipe.

    What are the worst offenders? Those programs offering either "cute" or "informative". Desktop wallpaper, custom cursors, so many toolbars and geegaws to make your browser look like CNN's Headline News. A time updater. A date updater. A weather notifier. Hate to tell you, but I have a watch, a calendar, a radio, and a window. Between these four things, I think I'll know what the day/time is and what weather is coming.

    What would these same users do if they drove up to a street corner and there was somebody waiting to plaster their car with a flashy bumper sticker in exchange for their friends' email addresses? I would hope that these folks would just drive away. So why does it work on a computer screen?

    Hell, half the problems business have could be solved if companies just banned access to all the websites that produce these programs. Can't download Weatherbug or Webshots if you can't get to the websites in the first place. No need to visit each individual computer if you can use the firewall to do your job for you. Anyone have a list of those evil IP addresses they'd like to share? (and by "evil" I mean, well, "evil")

    1. Re:Nip it in the bud by Finuvir · · Score: 1

      A time updater. A date updater. A weather notifier. Hate to tell you, but I have a watch, a calendar, a radio, and a window. Between these four things, I think I'll know what the day/time is and what weather is coming.

      You shouldn't use Windows! Oh, that kind of window. Well I guess that's safe enough, just ... keep it up to date.

      --
      Why is anything anything?
    2. Re:Nip it in the bud by DChristensen · · Score: 2, Funny

      Be sure to include:

      66.35.250.150

      That kills more of my time than I know what to do with.

      --

      --
      Mac OS X--Unix without the assholes^Whassles.

    3. Re:Nip it in the bud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a totally random idea, which I haven't tried. It's probably doomed to failure for whatever reason, but it might be fun to think about.

      The idea is, go track down a weather notifier, and a fancy clock (that makes it clear that it's "synchronized within 0.15 seconds of the True Time" or some stupid thing like that), and some helpful toolbars for the IE web browser (like the Google one). Ones that are useful and not spyware. Then install these by default on everybody's machines.

      Then maybe you will at least reduce the desire to go in and dress up the system. Plus maybe if you're lucky, you can choose programs that won't drag down your Internet connection. Of course, it's always possible that instead you'll just get people excited about frills and encourage them to look for other cool stuff...

  83. Mac tech support by deadkarma · · Score: 0

    I've been working as a Macintosh help desk tech for about 7 months, and not once have I heard of someone calling about spyware.
    Although, I've had a few calls where people *thought* they had a virus because of some strange email in their inbox, but that's about it.

    1. Re:Mac tech support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most Mac support calls would be about errant gerbil insertions I'm sure.

  84. CrossOver Results by Democritus2 · · Score: 0
    Lets see I just installed spybot with CrossOver Office

    Install was smooth.

    Nope no spyware on this gentoo machine

    kidding aside more and more programs written for windows look decent with wine of your choice. Of course I would rather see native linux binaries (come on developers its not THAT hard to do it right the first time!!)

    --

    no god is good

  85. All jokes aside.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The thing that comes to mind is the old saying, "people should need a liscense to breed" or some variant. People should honestly need a "liscense" to own and run a computer.

    It is the uneducated that are wasting the internet away with installing this "cool" software that is chalked full of spyware, dragging the internet to its knees. Education is the key to a solution.

    Require a class, shit even offer a class for new computer buyers at retail stores. That would make a tremendous difference.

    1. Re:All jokes aside.. by mrbcs · · Score: 1
      Thank you windows.. This is all I do now. Remove Virii and spyware.. I'm not long for this puter gig.

      Used to be able to make a few bucks on puters, then help out my users. Now I just bang my head against the wall.

      Last year was all kazaa.. hehe as in Kazaa.. your machine is now toast! Now it's ridiculous. No money in the gig, tons of headaches, stooooopid users... not much fun anymore.

      Tip for anybody wanting to get into this: Find the nearest wall and bang head here for about an hour.... same result.. maybe less headaches

      --
      I'm not anti-social, I'm anti-idiot.
    2. Re:All jokes aside.. by Ded+Mike · · Score: 1

      Why no money?

      I charge users/friends--hell, even my mother--my normal bench fee of $70 in shop and double that in-home and present the bill as I am walking out. Turn them in for collections after 30 days. I love having them bring the computer in, thinking they are "saving money," because there are plain signs and a notice on the receipts and claims tickets that all in-shop repairs are COD--IOW, I effectively hold their PCs hostage until they fork over the dough for the full repair. Additionally, I am thinking of either implememnting a minimum charge or a minimum # of hours chargesd or a premium for purely software issues.

      I also give out Knoppix disks and hold Installfests, and resell AVG, Outpost and PestPatrol as well as Mandrake and SuSE and Knoppix at my store.

      I don't understand why you aren't happy this is happening, since it allows you to sell more and help educate your customers the only way they understand: causing them pain in their wallets!

      --
      Remember guys, this is Amerika. Just because you have the most votes, doesn't mean you get to win.--Fox Mulder
    3. Re:All jokes aside.. by mrbcs · · Score: 1

      Great. Glad somebody can make some money. I'm in canada and everybody's too cheap here now. I like the premium for software issues thing, since that's about all there is to do anymore. I'm just tired of the users. Man, you know how dumb some people can be.. I've personally spent about 30 minutes on the phone with one of my customers (who I do web stuff for) trying to explain how to save an internet shortcut to his desktop. I also spent 15 minutes explaining to his wife how to save a graphic from their website. Windows IMHO has just made everybody dumb. I gotta do somethin else ;-)

      --
      I'm not anti-social, I'm anti-idiot.
  86. I love Spyware! by lordmoose · · Score: 1

    I work on computers AND my child needs a new pair of shoes!!!

  87. its not lazy so much as training by holy_smoke · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Folks have been trained since the DOS days that they just turn on their computer and use it. Programs have been written for that environment with this assumption in mind (no user-admin privilage distinction).

    So the "Problem" is more Microsoft's failure than it is the users failure. Users use, and are taught how to use. Microsoft perpetrated the "run as admin always" problem, and they directly trained (through the use of their software) vast armies of average users and software developers to embrace this road as the norm and the expected software "reality". Unfortunately it is was a disasterous mistake in many regards (virii, worms, spyware, blah blah)

    They need to fix this basic architecture problem, and this will hurt users (learning curve, potential invalidation of older software) and the software industry (re-tooling their software code).

    Garbage in, Garbage out?

    --
    Is the juice worth the sqeeze?
    1. Re:its not lazy so much as training by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      You're right. Every home should have an IT monkey.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    2. Re:its not lazy so much as training by zerocool^ · · Score: 1

      So the "Problem" is more Microsoft's failure than it is the users failure. [...]They need to fix this basic architecture problem,

      Dude, you're a douche.

      Have you ever seen this:

      ./configure
      make
      su
      make install

      This is standard no matter what OS you're talking about. In order to get a lot of programs or whatever installed, you need to be able to access system files, and that means being root, or being admin, or whatever. Try installing courrier-imap without root privs. Or any of a hundred other programs. Try installing and playing Diablo II without admin privs on windows.

      You're a complete windows bashing fuckwit. Here's a clue I found in my pants for you: In order for programs to be able to run, many of them need to access the system. In order to access the system, on most OSs, windows included, you need to be admin/root. Ergo, spyware problems and stuff are using the same principle that unreal tournament 2004 is using: "This user needs to be able to access the system files in order to function. Therefore, we can access them too".

      Disallow access to system files? Computer not usable. Or at least, you can't ever install anything, or run complex programs.

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
    3. Re:its not lazy so much as training by maximilln · · Score: 1

      I think the larger part of the problem is the power given to the Windows registry.

      Say I purposely install Spyware on my Debian system. I look at the process list and see "gTkSpYwArE", so I kill the app, find out where it started, and I'm done. The app isn't coming back.

      Say I purposely install Spyware on my Windows system. I look at the process list and see "WinSpyware", so I kill the app, find out where it was started from, and I'm done. Except that the WinSpyware has polluted the Windows registry with a million different ways to have itself started has added a billion new registry keys which cause other programs to take on different behavior and may even cause them to become vectors for new spyware.

      We may be Windows-bashers but, all in all, MS created a large portion of the problem by legally buying the right for an EULA to expunge the software maker of any liability for a quality product. MS also created a large portion of the problem by including so much power in the registry.

      When Gnome and KDE begin to assume more control of the Linux world and they start their integration apps and desktop apps and registry apps... then Linux will have the same problem. Happily I don't depend on a desktop environment to spoonfeed me. Spyware is bugs on the spoon.

      --
      +++ATHZ 99:5:80
    4. Re:its not lazy so much as training by shaitand · · Score: 1

      "./configure
      make
      su
      make install"

      DUDE, your example kind of makes his point don't you think? It gives the strong implication you weren't running as root to begin with. Yes spyware could still piggyback on software (although it would be easy to find and remove on a linux system) but almost all spyware comes from ACTIVE X nonsense on the web.

      On linux you have to be root to install, but not to run software (unless it's administrative software and even then careful users and permissions planning will allow you to run as a non-root user for what you need).

      On windows the same theory applies, but in reality you have to be admin to RUN software. Yes root is needed to INSTALL but should never be needed to USE software. Software does not need to modify system files to run!

      "complex programs"

      Define complex, it's not as if a program can't read from dll's without admin privs. Aside from the actual install I can't think of any reason for non-administrative software (software which has the PURPOSE of modifying system files) to actually modify a system file.

      Updates? regular users shouldn't be installing those anyway. Each user should have their own private preferences and storage for files the software needs to modify, individual users don't need to modify global settings.

      Hell the only valid reason I can think of for storing information in the registry is that you have to during install in order for the app to show in add/remove otherwise there are these little things called files, they work pretty well. Text files work especially well for most things.

    5. Re:its not lazy so much as training by holy_smoke · · Score: 1

      actually that accusation (douche) applies to you instead, because you did not understand my point at all.

      My point is that root and user privelages should have always existed in Windows, but Microsoft chose to make root the default and only profile to run in for the longest time.

      Be nicer - it will get you more respect. Oh - and put some thought into understanding the post that you are replying too before embarrassing yourself next time.

      --
      Is the juice worth the sqeeze?
    6. Re:its not lazy so much as training by zerocool^ · · Score: 1

      Say I purposely install Spyware on my Debian system. I look at the process list and see "gTkSpYwArE", so I kill the app, find out where it started, and I'm done. The app isn't coming back.

      You've obviously never had a system rooted, have you?

      Most root kits overwrite ps and pstree and a bunch of stuff in order to hide what's running.

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
    7. Re:its not lazy so much as training by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting, this is in some ways a flaw in the Unix model (or at least in the make install paradigm) if applications are required to be installed in /bin or /usr/bin or somewhere with root permissions. Most applications really do not need to be installed this way. Personally, Unix systems should have a non-root owned common directory for applications where users can install shared applications that are not required to run set uid 0.

    8. Re:its not lazy so much as training by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      If you are only installing executables (not libraries), you could do the install in a subdirectory of $HOME, at least if the makefile allows the user to make that change.

  88. Obvious question... by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

    ..so forgive me for asking ( and no, this is not meant to be a "troll" ), but how do your users install this stuff on their machines?

    I run a 100-node network ( ~80 employees ), and I only have to deal with this stuff on my poweruser's computer. Everyone else is a limited user ( win2k ), and the machines are updated nightly ( if needed, via SUS for win2k server ).

    Am I missing something here?

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:Obvious question... by jenns · · Score: 1
      I don't know about most verticals, but in the legal vertical, there are often programs that insist that users are power users or (worse) local admins.

      We have one that insists on the latter. We use interactive user to keep their hard drives relatively private, but we're completely hosed when it comes to trying to lock them down. We do run SUS, which helps some, but we're going to have to invest in web security software next budget year for our own sanity--we hate to be nazis about it, but I don't have the budget and staff to deal with this crap.

      --
      Whatever women do they must do twice as well as men to be thought half as good. Luckily this is not difficult. -Whitton
    2. Re:Obvious question... by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      Which reminds me of the other thing I do: I run squid, with some extra stuff, and I have been known to be fairly vicious with the blacklist button.

      Basically, I shoot first and don't worry about the questions later. If someone needs access to a page, they can file a request.

      I do have a few apps that like to be annoying with the user security, but so far I've been able to find what the programs need access to, and give it to them. The hardest one required me to go digging though /c/program files/common file to find the right files to give my users access to, but I did it and it works.

      This does take more setup time initially, but I don't deal with spyware either, so I think it's a worthy trade off.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  89. Spybot on start-up works fine. by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 4, Informative
    But when you administer dozens, hundreds, thousands of Win boxes and you can't automate installing/configuring/running Spybot

    Gee, that's strange. We have 300 Win boxes in my building and about 1000 company wide, not a lot really, but more than a few... Spybot runs just fine from the start-up script. Actually, though, since our machines (all of them) stay on 24/7, we run it and other stuff at night too (but those are scheduled tasks, of course). Need my LAN admin's number?

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    1. Re:Spybot on start-up works fine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Need my LAN admin's number?

      Sure. While you're at it, why don't you give him the complete list of the applications you guys use so he can make a comparison for potential conflicts, and provide ticket frequency reports from his ticketing system before and after the implementation.

      Or, you could stop being a trolling tard and realize that there is more to system/network adminstration than knowing your LAN admin's number.

    2. Re:Spybot on start-up works fine. by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

      Pull your head out of your ass. The original post says it is not feasable to run SpyBot from the log-in script. He *does not* say there are software conflicts. I am simply saying that is *is* feasable to run SpyBot from the log-in script, we do it. By the way Anonymous Coward, who is the "troll"? Chances are, the "Anonymous Coward".

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    3. Re:Spybot on start-up works fine. by pbranes · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yeah, but are you going around manually installing spybot on every single machine? The time to manage that kind of setup is exponential to the number of machines you have. If you have a way to deploy spybot, push updates, & schedule scans remotely, I would love for you to post that method.

      I don't understand why antivirus companies don't include spyware removal in the virus tables. It wouldn't require any additional programs - they just have to get a signature for each type of spyware and put it in the table. It seems like such a logical, easy step, that you have to wonder what would motivate the antivirus companies to not clean off spyware. Are they just big, slow, stupid corporations who can't see **THE NEXT BIG THING**? Are they afraid of a lawsuit from spyware companies like Claria (Gator)? Do they have an unwritten agreement with spyware companies to stay out of their territory?

    4. Re:Spybot on start-up works fine. by trentblase · · Score: 1
      time to manage that kind of setup is exponential to the number of machines you have

      If by exponential, you mean linear then yes. I think the comparison you are going for here is linear vs. constant (almost)

    5. Re:Spybot on start-up works fine. by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1
      Yeah, but are you going around manually installing spybot on every single machine?

      All the "standard" software is part of the image that each new machine gets. Of course the older machines don't always have it, but when we go around and do upgrades / tweeks / regular maint, we add it.

      Really, I don't know what wild hair the above poster has up his ass about this, all I did was point out that it is perfictly possible to run SpyBot from the log-in script. No big deal.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    6. Re:Spybot on start-up works fine. by Verteiron · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you'll check the Spybot S&D forums, you'll find that, yes, there is a way to get push SpybotSD out to machines on a domain, and update it, and run it, silently, with no user interaction.

      http://forums.net-integration.net/index.php?c=7

      --
      End of lesson. You may press the button.
    7. Re:Spybot on start-up works fine. by Samhaine · · Score: 1

      It's called Network Management software. In this particular situation, I'd fire up my build VM, install and configure SpyBot the way I like, and build out a new package from the change file. Once that's done, it's a simple matter to set up the push to clients.

      Any company with multiple hundreds of machines should have some kind of network client management software, even if it's just published MSIs using Active Directory.

    8. Re:Spybot on start-up works fine. by Cigamit · · Score: 1

      Actually, I believe McAfee picks up most spyware (but not nearly all of it) as "Potentially Unwanted Programs", or at least I get a McAfee report every week from our networks' sys admin detailing what computer has spyware (which I then have to remove)

      You shouldn't have to physically Install it on every PC. Spybot should run without the initial registry settings (which you could also push to each machine in a script if you want to), you just need the files to be on the PC or a mapped drive and set it to run at startup via the logon script.

    9. Re:Spybot on start-up works fine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I know you're trying to be sarcastic, but I also manage about 120 computers in an office where this isn't possible. Each of the computers are on the same network, and use the same bandwidth, and share some of the same files, but each computer owner is an independent contractor and we can't put anything on their computers without permission first. They don't leave their computers on all the time, we have no startup script options, it's a mess.

      I remove spyware from 5 to 10 computers a week in my city. They drop them off with me, I remove spyware, I go to their office and remove spyware, I see spyware in my dreams, I eat spyware for breadfast, and as they said in the movie Stripes...

      I eat sleep walk talk shoot sh*! spyware!

    10. Re:Spybot on start-up works fine. by Hagakure · · Score: 1

      Deploy software: Tivoli or other software distribution tool of choice.

      Push updates: Tivoli & possibly some packaging suite (Tivoli Autopack would probably work fine)

      Schedule scans: AT should work well for this. Plenty of other utilities can be used if the gui requires clicks instead of command line params. AutoIt comes instantly to mind.

      if you aren't using managed distribution of software to your PCs in the first place you've got some issues. i mention Tivoli cuz its IBM and can work with Windows as well as Unix/Linux servers and workstations.

      --


      If this is Heaven I'm bailin out! I cant tolerate this ol tin-tub, so fulla trash and rats...
    11. Re:Spybot on start-up works fine. by amuro98 · · Score: 1

      Isn't it obvious? The software industry isn't about "the next big thing" - it's about how finding the minimal number of new features required by the market such that you can make them buy a whole new version each year.

      I'm really surprised there isn't a program that will allow an admin to scan every Windows PC under his control looking for unauthorized software - this would include viruses, worms, spyware, malware, and other applications defined by the admin (eg. AOL messenger) Admins could determine action policies for the scanner to take - such as automatically removing viruses/spy/malware, or notifiying the admin that Bob in Accounting is running an unrecognized, unauthorized application and needs to be reminded of the company's IT policy.

      In fact, it could go a step further and check that certain applications are installed and running, like the company's choice of anti-virus client.

      The software companies have failed to realize thus far that these 3 tasks as are actually part of the same job of keeping a network secure and stable. Why make admins use multiple and incompatible tools when realistically, the functions should be combined into a single solution.

    12. Re:Spybot on start-up works fine. by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

      Except that Bob in accounting is also Mr Robert Bigchotte CFO and golf buddy to CEO. Then all of a sudden his IM and custom excel add-ons are perfectly fine. Oh, and let's not forget his online poker...

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

  90. This is what we call a BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY by bludstone · · Score: 1

    BING!

    Problems with your COMPUTER?!
    Is your computer slower then when you bought it?
    Getting frustrated with dozens of advertising popups?

    Call us today! 1-800-WeDemolishSpyware and we will send out one of our geeks to examine your pc and fix it. Just make the FREE call, answer 3 simple questions, and we will dispatch a tech to your home... for a fee.

    Get your internet back!

    Call NOW!

    BING!

    --

    no .sig
    1. Re:This is what we call a BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Not an original thought, actually. One of the most popular ways to persuade a user to install spyware these days is to promise that spyware they want him to install--will stop spyware!

      Chris Mattern

  91. But I run Win98SE you insensitive clod! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Thanks for your insightful and informed post. (but doesn't help much for us win 9x users [the ME users were beyond help anyway])

    This suggestion won't much help the Joe Smoe user who doesn't know 'Administrator' from a garbage heap, and just wants to be able to surf the web and check his email, and install the occaisional piece of software without trouble.

  92. is spyware run on Linux as well? by yopie · · Score: 1

    Just wondering, is this run on MS Windows only? Or it can run on any OS like Mac OS and Linux?

    1. Re:is spyware run on Linux as well? by Democritus2 · · Score: 0
      Right now you dont need to

      Eventually I suppose you will.

      --

      no god is good

  93. How to stop Spyware long term by parp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I manage an office of about 70 Windows PCs. When I first started many of the PCs had spyware on them. Every other day someone would complain and I would clean it off. When the same people kept asking for spyware removal it became clear that to solve the problem you have to prevent the average user from installing software on their PC.

    Want to stop spyware? Do not log in with Administrative rights! 99% of spyware requires administrative rights to install. In the corporate environment this is simple: don't give out the local administrator password to anyone Ever! And don't put regular users in the Administrators group. For home users, create two accounts - one for installing software with admin rights, and one for everyday use without admin rights.

    UNIX admins figured this out years ago. You only use root when you must, why don't most Windows users do the same thing? My suspicion is most home users don't like the concept of windows login's and passwords. To solve this I wish XP home had a simple switch for a user to enable or disable software installation.

    1. Re:How to stop Spyware long term by silverbax · · Score: 1

      I agree in concept, except when 70 users becomes 20,000 users.

      UNIX, Novell, Microsoft all have tools to give the rights access rights to the people who should have them, but large corporations rarely invest in that kind of detail. Too often I've found developers who cannot administer their own machines or customer service reps who can install whatever spyware they like.

  94. My solution by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 1

    The developers at my company are very tech-savvy and have no problem taking care of and their workstations, it's the execs I have to worry about.
    I showed them my Powerbook G4 and jeaslousy set in. Now we're standardizing on iBook G4s for traveling execs. No more worrying about them coming back from a trip w/ a virus, no spyware either.

  95. Avoid free software by Lurker+McLurker · · Score: 1
    Finally, Friedberg cautions Internet users to pay extra attention to offers of free software. "Be suspicious," he said. "When something's free, there's likely a catch."
    Hmm, the Microsoft guy had to get that one in. Now we'll have people afraid to download Mozilla because they have read free software (if they don't know the difference between software that is free to download and Free Software) usually has a catch.

    Surely better advice would be to read the licence agreement.

    --
    Mod parent up!
    1. Re:Avoid free software by Dr.+Molf · · Score: 1

      I was wondering if anyone else caught that jibe in at the EVIL FREE SOFTWARE. Remember, unless you pay for it -- it's bound to be malicious! With the collary (of course) being "Software you pay for is only good for your system. It will not break and damage your computer. It is designed _perfectly_." * SIGH *

      Back to my Apple //e without the Adware.

      --
      indeed..
  96. "legal" viruses by esoterus · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is absolutely the biggest problem tech support-wise that I have to deal with these days with my clients. It surprises me that they aren't yet seen in the same light as viruses are. They can be just as crippling, just as tricky to remove (even with ad-aware and spybot), and just as sneaky getting in to your system...

    I've told people when they've asked me how their infestation happened that they're basically viruses they actively allowed to be installed, though in some cases I'm not even sure you as user have to "ok" to let in there. I advise users to click "x" on the installer windows now - I don't even trust "no" anymore.

    --
    Not only does God definitely play dice, but He sometimes confuses us by throwing them where they can't be seen. -Hawking
    1. Re:"legal" viruses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's worse than that even. Usually the FIRST program is one you actively allow to install, but you get one on your system, and they start installing others.

      I'm not even sure of the legality of these things. There are limits to what you can agree to, you know. You can sign a piece of paper saying "I allow you to rape me." and, according to law, no still means no.

      I think courts are going to need to look at what is legally allowed and legally binding in EULAs, because I don't see how a simple clicking "OK" on a EULA that no one reads can legally allow companies to steal every bit of information on your computer and trash your computer with (what are essentially) viruses.

    2. Re:"legal" viruses by esoterus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I agree... funny because the digital age is about the ever-increasing speed of information but then someone will throw this huge EULA in your face amidst your light-speed web surfing and your average user will click first and ask questions later...

      It's like throwing a speed bump in the middle of a freeway, you're gonna get a lot of folks that'll, rather than slam on the breaks, will just hit it at their current speed and destroy their car in the process.

      --
      Not only does God definitely play dice, but He sometimes confuses us by throwing them where they can't be seen. -Hawking
  97. New category LMAO by rixstep · · Score: 1

    You gotta love this quote from Wired's ace reporter:

    the proliferation of a NEW category of deceptive software

    How long have Lavasoft been out there?

    Registrar: domaininfo.com
    Domain Name: lavasoftusa.com
    Record created: 21 May 2001
    Record last changed: 27 May 2002
    Record expires: 21 May 2006


    Prolly is a Usenet pest who never reads the FAQs...

  98. You need to add more to your tools by nlinecomputers · · Score: 1

    Put Spywareblaster and Spywareguard on their systems maybe even a host file. Still not a perfect solution but will most likely keep them out of trouble.

    --
    Slashdot, home of supporters of free software, free music, and free speech.Except for Moderators that disagree with you.
  99. Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm making 600-800 a week part time in the evenings doing consulting by removing this crap from client systems. For me, fixing the problem is a bad thing....

  100. Free == Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Did anyone else notice the bit at the end about free (presumably as in beer) software?
    Finally, Friedberg cautions Internet users to pay extra attention to offers of free software. "Be suspicious," he said. "When something's free, there's likely a catch."

    Watch out, free software usually has a catch! Don't be pulled in by the trickery of Sharman Networks' or those crazy Linux distributors!
  101. You can look under the hood yourself by zeno_lee · · Score: 5, Informative

    In addition to using the various anti-spyware software recommended above, like AdAware and SpyBot, I've made it a regular habit to look at these registry keys:

    Run regedit:
    Start->Run-> "regedit"

    Look in:
    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE
    SOFTWARE
    Microsoft
    Windows
    CurrentVersion
    Run
    RunOnce
    RunOnceEx

    The Run is an especially attractive haven for spyware companies. That's how spyware programs run their programs after users reboot their computers. If you suspect there are weird entries in these registry keys, download spyware removal software and run it. If you don't know what you're doing don't mess with the keys.

    I also check TaskManager regularly for weird processes. It's a bit technical, but after a while you can see which processes belong and which ones don't.

    1. Re:You can look under the hood yourself by og_sh0x · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Also look under the HKEY_CURRENT_USER branch, under the same registry keys. Some programs will hide some startups in there, knowing most people who know about HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE still don't know to look in HKEY_CURRENT_USER. Also take a look at your BHOs (Browser Helper Objects). This program should help you sort them out without having to dissect your registry: BHODemon

    2. Re:You can look under the hood yourself by jonathanclark · · Score: 1

      There are actually 6 places you should to look:

      HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\microsoft\windows\cu rr entversion\run
      HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\micros oft\windows\curr entversion\runonce
      HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\mic rosoft\windows\curre ntversion\run
      HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\microsof t\windows\curre ntversion\runonce
      C:\Documents and Settings\MYUSERNAME\Start Menu\Programs\Startup
      C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Start Menu\Programs\Startup

      Each of these places allows you to add a program that will run everytime your computer boots or you login as a specific user.

    3. Re:You can look under the hood yourself by rsadelle · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, figuring out what the things in Task Manager are isn't as technical as it looks. I happen to like Answers That Work's list. It's a little heavy on "use our tool to turn this off," but if you know enough to be looking at your Task Manager, you probably also know enough to be able to turn off the services yourself. (Control Panel > Administrative > Services)

    4. Re:You can look under the hood yourself by sootman · · Score: 1

      Safer method: start -> run -> 'command' or 'cmd', then 'regedit' at the prompt. that way, you don't leave 'regedit' in the 'run' box's command history--one less thing for curious users to run accidentally or say "hmm, what's this?"

      and lest you think no one but geeks uses the run box, pick up any game--the installation instructions probably say "start -> run -> X:\setup.exe (where X is the letter of your CD drive)".

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    5. Re:You can look under the hood yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah.
      The worst offender is LSASS.EXE.
      To get rid of this NUISANCE is do CTRL-SHIFT-ESC, open the Task Manager, and kill that process.
      This program has been reported to monitor user activity, and send regular reports (undetected) to a central authority, which then sells the information to marketing agents.

  102. Old Hat by doodleboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Like a lot of the /. crowd, I do tech support for an extended group of family and friends. Most of these folks have no idea that leaving an unfirewalled unpatched win98 machine sitting on a broadband connection is a bad thing. All they know is it doesn't work anymore and can I fix it?

    If they're on a broadband connection I get them a hardware firewall. I don't even ask, I just buy it and hand them the bill. I also enable automatic updates. I generally use free tools like ad-aware and spybot, tiny firewall, a free av scanner if they're too cheap, etc.

    In what has to be the most painful bit for them, I give the Inevitable Security Lecture. Their attention span being what it is, I only hit the high points. I point to the Windows Update icon, explain what critical updates are, explain what spyware is (and how to use ad-aware & spybot), etc. It's probably a waste of time, but you never know.

    There you have it. I've been through it over and over. Like I said, old hat.

    1. Re:Old Hat by msim · · Score: 1

      I'll do tech support for the girlfriend, dad and mum, and one particular friend. Then there is one particular other friend who knows a bit about computers and when wants something done sends me a sms along the lines of "i have a job for you to network" at stupid hours of the night.

      My usual reply is "you know how to do it, do it your frickin self". For this person i refuse to help him through problems that he inherently causes himself by simply not leaving well enough alone.

      --

      Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know when your gonna get food poisoning.
  103. Does Mike's Ad blocking hosts file cover this? by British · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If a bunch of spyware sites are set to a certain # of hosts, can we just make them resolve to 127.0.0.1 with a nice custom hosts file?

    I know mike's ad blocking hosts file does it for pop-ups, but what about stuff like bonzi buddy?

    If so I'd like to put it on my dad's computer. Problem is, a lot of little rinky-dink apps he downloads have spyware just piggybacking on it. Then again there's a few utilities that take care of that.

    Ahh i can see in a few years we'll have a nice internet that will blindfold themselves to such malicious sites.

    1. Re:Does Mike's Ad blocking hosts file cover this? by Enrico+Pulatzo · · Score: 1

      I was thinking along similar lines. For a corporate solution, wouldn't DNS be the place to start?

    2. Re:Does Mike's Ad blocking hosts file cover this? by British · · Score: 1

      I was thinking Internet backbones would be a good start. Let's deny spyware to an entire nation. :)

    3. Re:Does Mike's Ad blocking hosts file cover this? by The+Taco+Prophet · · Score: 1
      I block their sites at my router at home. No traffic comes in our out for those sites.

      At work, where I have less control over the network, I do exactly as you suggest. My hosts file is getting huge :)

    4. Re:Does Mike's Ad blocking hosts file cover this? by sootman · · Score: 1

      Don't know about Mike's, but this one blocks lotsa spyware, dialers, etc.:

      http://www.mvps.org/winhelp2002/hosts.htm

      The blocking of ccbill occasiaonally hampers my ability to get to TGP sites, but it's worth it. And I have a custom 404 on localhost that says "Another blocked ad!" that brings a smile to my face every time I see it in an inline frame. :-)

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  104. Re:Centrally managed network enabled spyware remov by gregarican · · Score: 1

    If you are talking about a corporate setup with some sort of software standardization you could check the HKLM or HKCU Software-->Microsoft-->Windows-->CurrentVersion--> Run key for values present. That's where a lot of malware/adware/spyware hides. I do this through using KixTart as part of the network logon script.

  105. What spyware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Spyware? On Linux? Are you utterly mad, sir?

    Oh, but the gall, the gall!

    Lord of the Spies

  106. [X] marks the spot by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is what I told my dad after removing another 20 porn auto-dialers from his system ("Yeah sure dad, you have no idea how those got there"); Whenever you encounter a popup which you don't fully understand, click the [X] button top-right, do not click the "Yes", "No", "Cancel" or any other buttons. If no [X] button exists, hit the Alt+F4 keys. This basically got rid of practically everything problems since he doesn't install software himself (wouldn't know how if he wanted to).

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  107. Re:Just run Spybot: A Word From The Trenches by devphaeton · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Or adaware or hijack this, yadda yadda...

    Problem is, we're talking about computers owned by the unwashed masses (at least in my tech support job). These are people that call up with a chip on their shoulder demanding that their ISP fix what has happened to their computer. Wonderful ads lik "Earthlink with a free Pop-Up blocker" etc. have now in the perception shifted the responsibility of parasite problems onto the ISP.

    A lot of these people don't understand the basic directory structure or how to find something that's been downloaded onto their computer, and walking them through a download of a parasite removal tool, updating it, running it, and then guiding them through what to do with what it has found can EASILY turn into a 2-hour procedure. Most of us have more important shit to do than that. Double that amount of time if they don't have two phone lines and/or cannot be connected to the internet. Any coincidental problems are blamed on your removal tool.

    Also, the latest trend i'm seeing, is people calling up to complain about all these popup ads and homepage hijackings/search pages thrown in. You start pointing to all the free games they've downloaded, bonzai buddy, Desktop Calendar, Weatherbug, etc, and you are met with "but i LIKE having my weather updates, i LIKE having my Calendar there" etc.

    THEY WILL REFUSE TO LET YOU HELP THEM

    Doesn't stop them from still calling you up "i'm still having a problem with all these popups..."

    Most machines i've cleaned up (like HUNDREDS of parasites), i'll hand it back to them and tell them what not to do again, and they are in the exact same state in a week's time. They simply go and install all the same crap they had before.

    I was warned by many that doing Tech Support for a living was a burnout job, and borderline emotional abuse. But the last couple years of parasites have made it pure insanity. Tech Support is at a whole new low...

    "i need to find a new job" is an understatement.

    --


    do() || do_not(); // try();
  108. Someone should offer a reward by Doooh_head · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Someone should offer a reward to anyone who can come up with a completely successful way of:
    1 - Blocking spyware from being downloaded and installed EVER (aside from simply saying "Use Linux"), and
    2 - Completely cleaning already infected machines/browsers/etc, and
    3 - Hunting down the developers of all of this crap and them.

    It pisses me off knowing there are many hard-core intelligent software developers out there creating this crap!

    They all should suffer!
    The community should find them, like they do for child-molesters, and berate them and publically thrash them.

    --

    doooh
    1. Re:Someone should offer a reward by shaitand · · Score: 1

      "1 - Blocking spyware from being downloaded and installed EVER (aside from simply saying "Use Linux"), and"

      I fail to see what's wrong with saying "Use Linux", it's a simple honest straightforward answer that is effective. Just because you don't like the solution doesn't invalidate it. And perhaps you should consider what that is the correct solution so often...

      "It pisses me off knowing there are many hard-core intelligent software developers out there creating this crap!"

      Intelligent hard-core developers? Surely you jest, the main reason this crap is such a problem is that it's so poorly written and buggy. Believe it or not they don't MEAN for the spyware to disable and render your pc damn near useless, kill your browser, etc. They actually want things functioning correctly with some extra pop-up's so that you view their advertising.

    2. Re:Someone should offer a reward by Doooh_head · · Score: 1

      "I fail to see what's wrong with saying "Use Linux", it's a simple honest straightforward answer that is effective. Just because you don't like the solution doesn't invalidate it. And perhaps you should consider what that is the correct solution so often..."
      The whole issue of spyware/adware really has nothing to do with Linux does it? NO! So to tell someone who knows absolutely nothing about Linux, to switch from what they do know (Windows) to it, really isn't helping.
      "...Believe it or not they don't MEAN for the spyware to disable and render your pc damn near useless, kill your browser, etc..."
      How do you know? Are you one of "them"? I can appreciate whats involved in creating some of this crap and in most cases its not trivial (sorry I'm not the "uber-geek" like yourself). There is a certain amount of knowledge that is required. Alot of typical developers don't necessarily know or have that knowledge.

      --

      doooh
    3. Re:Someone should offer a reward by shaitand · · Score: 1

      "The whole issue of spyware/adware really has nothing to do with Linux does it? NO! So to tell someone who knows absolutely nothing about Linux, to switch from what they do know (Windows) to it, really isn't helping."

      It does in the sense that it has EVERYTHING to do with windows and Internet Explorer. Telling someone to use linux means getting away from the two things which bring on the spyware. It's not as if there is any troublesome spyware for linux. Switching to linux will in fact eradicate your spyware problem.

      It will also alleviate your virus problem in the same stroke... despite what people say concerning usage numbers and that as linux gets more popular there will be more problems the opposite has been true. As time has gone on and linux has grown in popularity we've STOPPED seeing linux viruses (not that there were many to begin with and those exploited vulnerabilities in standard technology and affected other platforms as well).

      "How do you know? Are you one of "them"? I can appreciate whats involved in creating some of this crap and in most cases its not trivial (sorry I'm not the "uber-geek" like yourself). There is a certain amount of knowledge that is required. Alot of typical developers don't necessarily know or have that knowledge."

      I know due to this thing called common sense, spyware makers are commercial entities out to sell you their crap, they may not care if their spyware crashes your machine, but their goal is to get you see their ads, if your machine is tanked you can't.

      As for the technical level, I don't think I've seen anything that would be impressive to a computer technician let alone a typical developer. Perhaps you mean a typical uninformed coder?

      They write values to the registry, this is trivial, what they accomplish with this and the hooks they use to start apps is more about understanding the registry than programming.

      They copy dlls into the system folder and register them, there aren't many programs that don't?

      And they phone home, transmit data and initiate popups. None of this IE interaction is hard to find information on. The active X exploits that most use to install are well documented on the web, the best place to find infromation on it is MSDN where they show you how to perform this great feat. The socket programming of course is VERY well documented.

      Armed with the correct information, the actual programming involved is trivial (compared to your average windows application). That it's written with so many bugs and problems show that those developing it are either unskilled, don't care, or both.

    4. Re:Someone should offer a reward by shish · · Score: 1
      1 - Blocking spyware from being downloaded and installed EVER (aside from simply saying "Use Linux")

      Use FireFox.

      --
      I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
  109. USE FIREFOX!! by Concrete+Nomad · · Score: 0, Redundant

    www.mozilla.org Download FireFox. There is no foolproof software to prevent people from downloading Bonzi Buddy and Gator. Ad-Aware and a good virus program should take care of the rest.

  110. Compatibility Mode by wodelltech · · Score: 1

    I use Windows (XP) at home primarily because I'm not prepared to make the ($) switch to a Mac yet. Our current software investment includes a lot of educational games passed down from child to child. Most of my childrens' games require XP compatability mode - which only works for Admin users.

    --
    Your monitor is staring at you.
  111. pkt filter by nelsonal · · Score: 1

    Can anyone point me in the direction of a tutorial on writing a rules file for pkt filter. It looks like a good GPL firewall but the default rules are dissallow everything. I've seen a couple of case studies, but would rather learn from others before I just start making assumptions about how to write good firewall rule settings.

    --
    Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
  112. wuamgrd.exe, point312.xe by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 1

    I've tried various virus/worm/adware programs and neither managed to remove these...

    Nasty little critter wuamgrd.exe - hid itself up in \windows\system32 with System/Hidden/Read-only attributes. Fortunately, a quick 'attrib -h -s -r' removed its sticky coating, and a quick 'del' sent it into oblivion, and a regedit to make sure no remnants was in the registry. I'm not sure about point312.exe - it may be just a printer driver, but it's one listening port I'd prefer not to have.

    Isn't it ironic that the purpose of the registry was to prevent malware from damaging the system configuration, and now it's the first place to check for such things.

  113. I wish I could STOP RUNNING AS ADMIN! by milgr · · Score: 1

    At home I sometimes run W2K. Whenever I get software, I check that it supports W2K. Unfortunately, supporting W2K is really only supporting running as admin in W2K.

    I expect to install software as Admin (just like su root under Linux). But, frequently there are permission errors if I want to run the installed software as a normal user. If I am lucky, I just need to modify the permissions of the save directories.

    This year TurboTax required me to run as Admin. It did a check at startup, and would not go any further if I didn't have admin privs.

    I wish that they would distinguish between being able to run under W2K, and being able to run as a normal user once installed on a secure W2K box.

    --
    Where law ends, tyranny begins -- William Pitt
    1. Re:I wish I could STOP RUNNING AS ADMIN! by Stephen+Chadfield · · Score: 1

      I have bought games targeted at under fives that claim to be Windows XP compatible but require Administrator privileges to run. My young daughter may be sensible for her age but I am not giving her Administrator privileges on a Windows box connected 24/7 to the Internet.

  114. bazooka, not just a hilarous chewing gum. by cabazorro · · Score: 2, Informative

    try bazooka spyware removing tool.
    Unlike some other tools that jack with your
    register, bazooka just detects and advices you
    on how to remove it.
    slashdotter remark:
    #of spyware on my linux box...el zippo.

    --
    - these are not the droids you are looking for -
  115. point of interest by RMH101 · · Score: 2, Informative

    you can't remove/readd TCP/IP in XP. you have to fix the stack. annoying, but there you go.

  116. Does Spybot S&D Immunize really work? by kcurtis · · Score: 0

    Like everyone, I've had plenty of these problems, and I run adaware and spybot. Lately I've been enabling the spybot immunization - but haven't had the time to test it.

    Has anyone seen whether this really works?

    1. Re:Does Spybot S&D Immunize really work? by sheddd · · Score: 3, Informative

      After rolling out ~35 new PC's at work (with user rights to the registry and c:\windows so our most used app will work) I was freaking amazed at how good some of our clueless users are at finding viri/spyware. If I put my mind to it I couldn't screw up a pc worse. Every time IE started (with the new xxx toolbar) around 30 popup windows with all sorts've educational pics came up.

      In 24 hours, one machine had over 60 viri quaranteened and several pages of crap that spybot picked up.

      After enabling immunize, their infection rate went to almost 0.

      It's not perfect, but it is a great help, IMO.

    2. Re:Does Spybot S&D Immunize really work? by taffeylewis · · Score: 1

      Ever thought about Mozilla? Or even FireFox? I don't get any spyware. You may also notice that the Spybot's immunize only works for IE. That's because it doesn't need to work for anything else.

      Don't get me wrong, I'm not having a go at Spybot. It's the mutts nuts. It's ActiveX, that's the real culprit.

      IMHO, any website that doesn't work properly with Mozilla/Opera etc... doesn't use proper JAVA anyway.

      --
      I drink, therefor I am... drunk.
  117. The worst problem by caffeineboy · · Score: 1

    The worst of these are the really nasty ones like coolwebsearch. These are not installed piggybacked onto Kazaa or something, but are installed through security holes in the system. For people that have only a 56K connection to the interweb, installing that latest 32MB service pack that fixes the problem is often a very undesirable option. So stuff like this gets in.

    I have uninstalled this several times, and found cases where the software decided, for whatever reason, to delete critical system files like run32.dll or parts of winsock.dll. I have no clue what this does for the jerks that write this stuff, but it breaks the hell out of these machines.

    --
    +++ ATH0 +++
  118. Disk Images Rock! by Mockura · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you have disk imaging software (Drive Image, etc.), after updating everything make an image and burn to CD. The next time you have to redo his system (and it sounds innevitable) just blast back to the base image.

    --
    Drink blood - 50 trillion mosquitoes can't be wrong.
  119. Re:Centrally managed network enabled spyware remov by D4MO · · Score: 1

    yeah, doing something similar already. just doesn't cut it with all those toolbar 'helpers', removing classid's, cookie, keeping upto date etc. I see on another thread that there is consensus that nobody is doing it yet.

    --

    Rocket science is easy. Neurosurgery, now *that's* difficult.
  120. Why did *you* post AC? by magefile · · Score: 1

    Now he can't find/email you! Even if he did announce himself, how would you friend him without an account?

    What was it about the pot and the kettle?

    1. Re:Why did *you* post AC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Now he can't find/email you!

      Because I didn't want to get modslapped OFFTOPIC.

      > Even if he did announce himself, how would you friend him without an account?

      He did and I have.

  121. Xupiter by The+Conductor · · Score: 1

    ...is of that type. It's eeeeeeeeeeeeevil.

  122. Education is the key! by myusername · · Score: 1
    I find that with the whole virus/worm/spyware thing, the best solution on our end is education about what these things are and what you can do on your part to avoid getting them.

    Is there any website out there where there is maybe a pdf that you can print out for people who are just starting out with computers and explains what viruses, worms, trojan horses, and spyware is and how to avoid them. I have searched google but haven't found anything that is good for a beginner.

    I would like to find something that you can give to a parent or friend and have them read it and keep it by their computer as a reference as to what they should and shouldn't do when it comes to email attachments and avoiding spyware.

    --
    Here a Sig There a Sig Everywhere a Sig Sig...
  123. Re:Just run Spybot: A Word From The Trenches by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

    Nah, just switch to using Macs. Life is much more...serene. Users are still stupid, but there isn't a huge spyware or virus problem there either.

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  124. Are you on Win2K? by not_a_product_id · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you are you can run most things as Administrator WITHOUT having log out. Just hold down shift and right-click on the EXE. The pop-up menu will have a "Run-As" option. Just put in your administrator details and away you go. It's not perfect but it's a damn sight easier than having to log out.

    --

    ---
    We spoke for about a half an hour. I don't recall a thing we said. - Colorblind James Experience

    1. Re:Are you on Win2K? by Tin+Foil+Hat · · Score: 1

      Nice tip. It works in XP too!

      Somebody mod that guy up! He managed to teach me a basic operation that I hadn't know about in my eight years of using MS products. Admitedly, I've been concentrating on Linux for he past three years so that's probably why I missed that particular feature.

      --
      No matter how many of my rights are taken away, somehow I still don't feel safe. -Frigid Monkey
    2. Re:Are you on Win2K? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      How did hell did you not know about it? Not only has it been discussed every time the "Windows doesn't have SU! Whine!" comes up on Slashdot, but, in Windows XP, it's not even a hidden feature... it shows right up in the contextual menu if you right-click an executable or a shortcut to an executable!

      Criminy, I don't get how anyone who uses the computer could possibly NOT know about it.

    3. Re:Are you on Win2K? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably the same people who aren't aware of the Windows pseudo 'su' deal are the same ones who think that the Hotbar e-mail emoticons are worth the price of unknown processes running rampant on their PC's.

    4. Re:Are you on Win2K? by Tin+Foil+Hat · · Score: 1

      Heh, I only use windows when absolutely forced to do so. I normally run some flavor of Linux. I'll be the first to admit that there are many things in Windows that I don't know about.

      --
      No matter how many of my rights are taken away, somehow I still don't feel safe. -Frigid Monkey
  125. Not entirely. by zonix · · Score: 2

    Entirely (?) removing CoolWWWSearch actually required running both programs.

    I believe some of the CWS spyware variants actually replace some of your executables (like Windows Media Player) with a trojan that downloads new versions of these wonderful pets. This is bad because no anti-spyware can help you when this kind of damage is done. You're gonna have to reinstall applications.

    I've always tried to explain to people that anti-spyware tools should be your last line of defense. You have to be aware of the dangers to avoid them, and adjust your behaviour on the internet accordingly (look up info on known spyware, inspect browser cookies before storing, etc.). Letting spyware in and having, say, Ad-aware deal with it after the damage is done just won't cut it (at least not anymore)! It's not like you do this with a virus?

    z
    --
    What would an EWOULDBLOCK block, if an EWOULDBLOCK could block would? -- me
    1. Re:Not entirely. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the one that my user got replaced WiMP and I had to uninstall and reinstall it as part of this process as well. Amazingly this user actually gave me useful information along those lines (and the WiMP Shortcut icon was replaced, what plebian thought up that particular trojan?) so I knew even before I got there that I'd have to do the reinstall shuffle.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  126. Your move, I will follow... by NIN1385 · · Score: 0

    I am waiting for someone else to go to court with spyware companies on destroying private property and win. Then my company will follow, we have been waiting for someone to start a lawsuit against them and win so we can do the same. My employers would more than likely jump at an opportunity to get back valuable time and money we have wasted on this problem. If just one lawsuit is won, then there will probably be many more to follow. They are advertising on people's private property and should not be allowed to continue. The american people get raped again...

    --

    If carrots got you drunk, rabbits would be fucked up. - Comedian Mitch Hedberg R.I.P. 03/30/68-2/24/05
  127. Re:Just run Spybot: A Word From The Trenches by devphaeton · · Score: 1

    Nah, just switch to using Macs. Life is much more...serene. Users are still stupid, but there isn't a huge spyware or virus problem there either.

    I assume that you are a Mac User. I think you'd know just as well as anyone what kind of feat that is trying to explain to someone why their next computer should be a Mac.

    For the record, the ISP i work at is very Mac-Centric, and I (myself) haven't used or owned a Windows machine since 1997

    --


    do() || do_not(); // try();
  128. On top of that by andih8u · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Most companies that provide tech support will not let you remove / delete anything from a user's computer...liability issues if removing spyware ends up borking the whole thing. Then it was tech support that killed the computer and the company is responsible for fixing it.

    --


    slashdot, news for crazed liberal socialist zealots
  129. Spybot's last update was March 4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use both Spybot and Ad-Aware with good results, and I remember when Ad-Aware 5 didn't get updated for awhile.

    However, Spybot's last update was March 4, so they're two months behind. I still use it, but I'm starting to lose confidence. They were updating every month or so, but it's nowhere near Ad-Aware's update cycle of every day or two.

    I've come across some pop-up ad-program at work that neither of these will remove, and it's not in the normal places (registry, startup, ini files, etc.) Had to re-image the system to get rid of it. Never did figure out what it was.

  130. TROLL ALERT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, this dude is a known troll.

    1. Re:TROLL ALERT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah, this dude is a known troll.

      An AC calling the kettle balck! Oops...

  131. Re:Just run Spybot: A Word From The Trenches by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

    Simple explanation:

    I have to wipe your hard drive clean and you lose all your email, word files, quicken records, tax records, business files.

    Or switch to a Mac and never have to worry about it again.

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  132. That's all I ever do... by tvh2k · · Score: 1

    Haha, thats all my friends/family ever asks me to do nowadays. Forget the days of setting up modem init strings, configuring IRQs, etc. No, now that everyone's on broadband, its spyware and "porn popups" for which my services are most frequently requested. Thanks adware makers, you keep me employed :-D

  133. easy by ajs318 · · Score: 1

    It is actually staggeringly easy to avoid installing spyware on your computer. Once you have downloaded a piece of software, just comment out anything in the source code that looks like it might be spyware, before you compile it. Then generate a difference file against the source you downloaded, and post it on your own web site as a patch so everyone can share and enjoy it.

    If you think that's hard, seek out your local guru and get their advice ..... they probably have already created their own patch anyway, if it's a package worth using.

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  134. Online experience by nuggz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I visit lots of sites. I get lots of email

    The problem is that people install random crap that they don't need, and it causes trouble.

    You only need a few plugins or helper apps.
    Flash is nice, Acrobat is a must, I grab mozilla too.

    I don't find my online experience lacking, I get my emails, I find phone numbers, and get information on other stuff I need. Ebay and online banking work just fine.

    1. Re:Online experience by NaugaHunter · · Score: 1

      Do you think it's impossible for them to be redirected/infected?

      Ebay and online banking work just fine.

      I'm not trying to say people need to do a lot for online to be useful, I was just trying to make the point that some of this stuff is done invisibly. Simply saying 'don't download toolbars' won't work if you don't take other steps. It sounds like you do, which is good but should be stated with your rule.

      --
      R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
  135. Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows IS spyware you fucking, wussy win-losing idiots. Admit it, you are suckers. And I might add, you deserve all the trouble you get.

  136. Maybe by llywrch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My primary workstation at home runs Linux. However, to keep peace in the familiy, I got my wife a laptop running Windows (98SE to be precise; don't laugh, it does everything she needs, & I installed Eudora so to avoid Outlook & all of its problems, a step that prevented her from virus infections countless times).

    So last week while playing one of the online games at Yahoo, she is bombarded by countless pop-up ads. While she is a competent user, she knows this is beyond her & asked for my help. So I sat down & started digging thru the guts of Windows.

    Now keep in mind that for the last several years, I have dealt almost exclusively with Linux, Solaris & other flavors of UNIX; I was drawing from my memory of Window 3.1 (& a hazy idea of the Windows Registry) for what to look for. And after 2 hours of hunting, I killed a couple of the easier bits of malware, but it wasn't until a colleague told me about Ad aware & Spybot that we truly started to make a difference.

    The moral of my story? Unless you're willing to live in a Windows-free world, its defects will still make your life miserable; & ignorance of Windows is not strength.

    Geoff

    --
    I think I see a trend here. Maybe for them it really would be easier to muzzle the entire internet than to produce p
    1. Re:Maybe by Ieshan · · Score: 1

      VMware.

      Seriously.

      Allow write access to the document folders, save-state only when *you* install something.

      Spyware and everything else is gone once you restart the computer.

  137. Damn depressing by mongolian · · Score: 1

    At school we have a techmaster organization where to go and fix people's computers when they have problems. I'd say about 80% or so of the texh requests are directly related to spyware. What's worse is that none of them will listen to what we tell them. Even with Spybot on their systems, they never run it or update it. Also, they stick with IE and always out of curiosity run that .exe email attachment that we warned them of so many times. It's damn depressing.

  138. Dell's support calls... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "...all technical support calls in Dell's consumer hardware division..."

    And I also heard that a whopping 23% of the calls were for "Curry in a Hurry" restaurant deliveries.

  139. how to fix this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MS should make windows xp like windows 2k3, where it asks you if you want to run an executable everytime you download. there should also be a message at the top, if "unsure click no" and have no as the default option. problem solved

  140. Re:Just run Spybot: A Word From The Trenches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Problem is, we're talking about computers owned by the unwashed masses (at least in my tech support job).
    Hey! stop talking about Slashdot people that way!
  141. WTF OMG LOL ROLLOFFLE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are now their bitch.
    Hahaha. It's funny because it's true. I am my family's "computer guy". *hangs self*

  142. Re:Just run Spybot: A Word From The Trenches by dheltzel · · Score: 1
    I was warned by many that doing Tech Support for a living was a burnout job, and borderline emotional abuse. But the last couple years of parasites have made it pure insanity. Tech Support is at a whole new low...

    "i need to find a new job" is an understatement.

    Now you can understand why so much of this is being outsourced to foreign countries. The stress levels are too high for minimum wage, but paying a real techie $40/hour to sit on the phone with a clueless customer for 2 hours is too expensive. Until the revenue model changes to actually charge the end user for the hours used, this will continue.

    from the if-you-can't-beat'em-join'em-dept.
    Have you considered acquiring a foreign accent to make it harder for people to understand you? When they give up and just live with all the slowness and annoyances, then your job is done!

  143. I need some spyware for Linux... by BrentRJones · · Score: 1

    ...what do I do? Oh and if you have a virus or worm could you let me know too?

    [Caution this is a semi-joke; I'm pretty sure Linux is still pretty virginal. But I'm looking for that one final reason to change from Windows to Linux.]

    --..

    --
    Help end the use of Sigs. Tomorrow
  144. Re:Just run Spybot: A Word From The Trenches by devphaeton · · Score: 1

    Yes -I- know this...

    but convincing someone else this....

    --


    do() || do_not(); // try();
  145. Block 66.35.250.150 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    66.35.250.150 is the IP address to block.

  146. Could I make $ doing spyware removal? by BrentRJones · · Score: 1

    Would people pay $25 per hour for me to do this for them? I'm a high school chemistry teacher wouldn't not mind the extra income. I would not feel guilty charging the same for family and friends.

    --..

    --
    Help end the use of Sigs. Tomorrow
    1. Re:Could I make $ doing spyware removal? by HermanZA · · Score: 1

      No, most people like having all that crap on their PCs. They only call for help once the PCs are completely FUBAR and fixing it then is no mean feat. Usually, I have to remove the disk drive and read their data with Linux, then write it to CDROMs and finally re-install the whole bloody PC and put he data back - about 8 hours of work. So, no, you can't make money only from removing spyware.

  147. New.net by Tantrum420 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I too had this problem. Let AdAware take out New.net and Blammo! No network connectivity. Did the research and found the fix just like you did.

    "And Class.... What did we learn?"

    I learned to cruise through add/remove programs and remove any of the obvious spyware first. Sure, they don't usually "completely" remove themselves but then spybot/adaware get the remnants and I haven't had any problems with partial uninstalls on anything since.

    Just a tip.
    T

  148. Re:Just run Spybot: A Word From The Trenches by Greyfox · · Score: 1
    That's why tech support people who actually know something about computers either quit within six months or become increasingly psychotic as time goes on. Eventually you end up enjoying telling users they have to completely wipe their machines and reinstall from the original installation media.

    Tech support people who don't know anything about computers (these are by far the majority) can go years without any ill effects. For those people, their job is to answer the phone and read a script.

    It helps if your company has a process in place for various issues. When I worked tech support, there were actually times when we could say "Sorry! That's your problem! We're not going to help you! We're not responsible for you fucking up your computer!"

    Personally I think Internet access should be licensed, just like Ham Radio is. And tech support people should be able to revoke that license at any time for any reason. "You installed WHAT?! I'm sorry sir, I'm afraid I'm going to have to revoke your Interent license."

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  149. So true by panic911 · · Score: 1

    It's amazing how bad spyware and adware are getting, and even more amazing is how most non-savvy people have no idea what it is! They all know about virus's and stuff, but this epidemic seems to be becoming worse than virus's.

    I work in the MIS Department of my company and people are always asking me what they can do to speed up their personal computers at home. The first thing I always tell them is to go download ad-aware (http://www.lavasoftusa.com) and they almost always come back the next day saying that their machine is running 10 times faster than it did before.

  150. Spyware Component Records? by vonsneerderhooten · · Score: 1

    Whats the most spyware components that any of you have found and removed from a computer? Mine's around 3000. That's right. We have a thing around here where running Ad- Aware and the like is more of a game. People bring in their computers, and immediately run Ad- Aware and spybot on them. I hold the current record in the store.

    1. Re:Spyware Component Records? by gregarican · · Score: 1

      Reading this makes it obvious why folks with newer PC's constantly complain about their systems running slowly. With dozens of active threads running in the background it's no wonder. I read somewhere the average home user has 20+ active adware/spyware/malware instances on their PC. Amazing.

  151. Benefactors by blunte · · Score: 1

    It would be interesting to see the money trail involved in common spyware.

    I'd like to see the endpoint companies who are advertising, wittingly or unwittingly, via spyware. Perhaps the way to go about ridding spyware is to shun companies into policing their advertising partners to ensure they don't ever use spyware as their method.

    --
    .sigs are for post^Hers.
    1. Re:Benefactors by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 1

      Making it illegal to advertise via companies that use scummy business practices like this is, in my opinion, the only way to get rid of spyware. Not that this would guarantee that all spyware disappears overnight, but it would substantially cut down on the profits when only the scummiest companies advertise via spyware.

  152. Spybot + Adware + NAV + ZoneAlarm + SP by master_p · · Score: 1

    That's the best solution. And these programs must be run often in order to maintain a secure machine.

    Someone mentioned LSPFIX (for fixing winsock settings). If only I had it four hours ago!!! I just spent 4 hours of my life re-installing Windows and all the little apps that are needed for good operation...

  153. Why don't AV progs include spyware protection? by Retired+Replicant · · Score: 1

    Why is it that spyware removal remains a separate category of software. There should be a feature added to AV programs to prevent spyware from ever being installed in the first place.

  154. I LOVE Spyware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I've developed a small, word-of-mouth, cash-only business removing spyware and adware from friends and friends-of-friends' various Windoze machines. I use free tools like AdAware and Spybot. I tell them about Popup-Stopper and Kazaa lite.

    I don't tell them about Firefox, Mac OS X, or Linux anymore. I also don't tell them to not use regular Kazaa anymore. After the first twenty or so times I tried, I got nothing in reply except blank looks, shrugs, and scorn, derision, and vitriol about any other operating system other than Windoze.

    Now I don't tell them because in a month or two, like clockwork, they call me again and I repeat the procedure, and pocket another $50 CASH that they happily fork over. I've even been called a "lifesaver" many times.

  155. How to remove Spyware by slonkak · · Score: 2, Informative

    1. Kill all suspicious processes
    2. Clear Internet history, cookies, and cache.
    3. Delete any crap from the Startup group
    4. Install Ad-Aware (this might have to be done from cd or removable media since some spyware causes internet breakage)
    5. Update Ad-Aware
    6. Run Ad-Aware
    7. Delete anything Ad-Aware quarantined
    8. Run msconfig and remove from the Startup group anything you don't know what it is
    9. Reboot
    10. Repeat steps 6 and 7
    11. Reboot

    You should be good to go. I've had to do this on just about everyone's computer in the dorm at school and many family and friend's computers... It's never failed once.

    Some people might not like this suggestion, but trust me, it works. Install Firefox and remove any shortcuts to IE (just make it unusable by the average person, since you still need it for Windows Updates). Teach whoever how to use Firefox. I've done this with my parents (who are NOT computer literate). I set all the settings correctly, installed all the plugins, etc. They don't miss IE at all. Plus, Firefox blocks popups and doesn't run ANYTHING without asking you first, thus, no more unwanted spyware from bad websites...

  156. WHAT ABOUT PROXIES!!!!! by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 1

    Did we forget how to set exclusive proxies?

    --
    How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
  157. My Two Cents, Korean Spyware... The Horror! by Chordonblue · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'd have to agree, with the small provisio that I think that anti-virus firms need to do a better job defining what a virus IS.. As the admin of a small school I've decided that next year I'm locking down the labs - big time. I didn't do it up until now because of program incompatabilities but I have to say that if this remains an issue, it won't matter - we'll get different programs.

    It wasn't so bad before this year. Yeah, there was some spyware out there, but it wasn't like f*cking 'n-case' which replicates itself to random filenames all over your drive and then inserts startup stuff in 'startup', the local and machine registry, and even the freakin' win.ini!!!

    I called Sophos on this after spending some two hours cleaning it up. I basically said, "You folks need to take some responsibility here."

    The time has come to draw the line in the sand. n-case and others like it, are VIRAL. It can't be removed easily by the user - NO agreement of this nature can be legally binding.

    Now for what frightened me the most: Ever have spyware that couldn't be cleaned by Spybot and/or Ad-Aware - even with the latest patches? No? Then you probably don't live in Korea. A few of our students do, and this is where this particular piece of crap came from. It defended itself by making a program that runs at startup that runs a program that insures that another program is there and running THAT, reprograms your home page to a site that ActiveX 'drivebys' your computer to load the program!!! :O

    That was a bitch to clean up (although nothing compared to n-case!). You probably haven't seen this yet because it's a Korean app - but it managed to get on a few American machines here when the Koreans visited a site that installed some 'happy fun cursor' program.

    I'm ranting.. But the truth is: Admins have to do their part, but the anti-virus people have got to do a better job also. They need to stop turning a blind eye to this issue.

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
  158. Any tips for NT4/2k domain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a workstudy at a local college. The domain is NT4 server with 2k workstations. Our net admin is worthless, so I'm trying to figure out a way to limit the amount of spy/adware we have on our systems, which is alot.

    I'd also like to limit installations that don't quite qualify as adware, like Yahoo Messanger and Google toolbar(questionable). I've limited access to the Program Files dir, no write access. But what I'm wondering is there a built in feature for NT4 to limit installs of any kind to users? If so please respond with any tips that may be useful!
    Email will probably work best if you're really generous

    spite_fowl@yahoo.com

    Thanks!

    PS: OT problem also, I've been trying to lock down the roaming profile, so that they download the profile from the server, but no changes are made and the local profile is wiped out on logoff, This has become a tiresome delimna, I can lock down the profile on the server, but the local profile remains and causes some problems. Any tips from MS admins would be helpful!

  159. Why dont they lock down Run and Runonce? by Matey-O · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It seems like MOST of these beasties throw themselves into the Run and/or Runonce registry keys. Why can't those keys be locked down?

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    1. Re:Why dont they lock down Run and Runonce? by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because Winders has a fundamentally flawed security implementation. No, I won't defend that statment. Res loquitur ipsa.

      --
      Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
    2. Re:Why dont they lock down Run and Runonce? by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1

      I won't claim expert-hood, but each registry key has a permissions dialog much like NTFS. Looks to me like they can indeed be locked down, no?

  160. So I'm just wondering... by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    Does MacOS have a magic spyware prevention AI, or is this simply a temporary fix theorugh obsucrity. Remember, spyware has nothing to do with the security of lack of in an OS since the user actually isntalls the spyware, either alone or with another program.

    Now being that Macs are at least reasonably popular and that spyware is just on the rise, the day will come when spyware makers start targeting Macs. There will never be as much of it, of course, since they are as popular as Windows, but then again the majority of the spyware you see in Windows as the same few programs over and over.

    So what happens then? Do you move your family to a different OS like Linux? If that gets targeted do you go to something REALLY obscure like VMS or QNX?

    I'm not saying there aren't good reasons to use MacOS, there are plenty, but "because there's no spyware" isn't one of them. That is running away from a problem that will eventually catch you. Unless you are ready to again hop to a new platform when it happens, it's a bad reason.

    1. Re:So I'm just wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spyware exists mostly because of APIs that exist to allow them. Generally, you must design software in a way that allows spyware, rather than designing it in a way that prevents spyware. If the services spyware use do not exist, the spyware cannot exist.

      However, I'm not sure if OS X provides these services or not. I'm guessing it doesn't, although if these spyware scum are really dedicated, they can write the kernel modules they need.

    2. Re:So I'm just wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm curious. Have always been either a Unix, Linux, or Mac user. Seriously, I've never spent more than an hour on a Windows machine since pre-Windows95 (am dating myself, okay).

      So can someone explain to me, where are the users downloading these malwares from typically? Just random ads on websites, or what? Surely not from sites like tucows or versiontracker?

      Just the ones that are downloaded deliberately, not those that install through IE holes and such...

      Many thanks.

    3. Re:So I'm just wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Macs (OS X) have a different permissions structure than PCs, and it is inherently more secure. Namely, you don't run as root all the time. There is no equivalent to ActiveX controls that can install stuff without your knowledge or at least without your typing an admin password. Of course, there are all the various unix style exploits and what not, but these are usually fixed through patches. This is why there will never be the same sort of spyware or even virus problem on Macs as there is on Windows. It can't happen.

    4. Re:So I'm just wondering... by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      Two main places:

      1) With software like Kazaa. Spyware companies pay people to bundle the spyware with the app. Kazaa is the worst, containing like 6 apps all by itself, but it is not the only one.

      2) By itself. Seriously. People actually LIKE the stupid shit the spyware does (like Comet Cursor that give you you a different looking mouse cursor) and install it, despite it's ill effects. This is WAAAAY more common than you'd think.

      Hence why an alternate OS is no defense. All that has to happen is spyware writers need to decide to target that OS and write their spyware for it.

      Spyware actually doesn't break in via holes, it's worms that do that. See spyware, by it's nature, is tied back to a company. Make it exploit, and you'll go to prison. So they piggy back it on other software or attempt to make it look legit to get people to install it. While shady it is, unfortunately, legal.

  161. The best? by Allen+Zadr · · Score: 1

    "format c: /q"
    That's the best way? I always thought it was:
    % mkfs.ext3 /dev/hda1
    After that, the spyware won't come back, either.

    --
    Kinetic stupidity has a new brand leader: Allen Zadr.
  162. Please don't tell them to call their ISP.... by Kazimira · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I saw in a couple of comments that folks referred users off to their ISP for help removing these items.
    DON'T! Please!
    A comparison I had to use yesterday with a customer because they were getting angry that we(ISP) would not help them was:
    If you have a car, don't maintain it, ignore the recall notices, drive without your seatbelt and slam it into park while still moving, you're going to have an accident or break the damn thing.
    Do not call the DOT/highway department because of it. We can't and are not going to help you.

    An ISP's job it to provided a customer an internet connection. Not to be their free tech bitches for any and every issue that comes along. We view virii and spyware as OS issues and not the ISP's connectivity issue.
    Our qualifying test is.....if your computer was in perfect working order, can you get on the internet. If it's not.....call us back when it is and we'll help you with the internet.
    That may sound a little customer unfriendly but when queue hold times are over 30 minutes and every customer is pissed off, you have to draw the line somewhere.

    If we fail to hold computer users responsible for their own actions, we are enablers of the behaviors we are complaining about.

  163. Unfortunately you can't always do that by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    I'm at a university, not a corporation, but there are coprporations with similar problems. Thing is at many places the buck does NOT stop with the IT people. The policies are made higher up. So you can argue to the people that make the policies that it should be policy that no one has admin and all installs must go through IT, but the don't necessiarly listen.

    That's where we are. We TRY to keep people at user level access, but if they demand admin access we basically aren't allowed to say no.

  164. Please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The other reason why Macs don't get a whole lot of virii is because they're lacking the application market. You're much more likely to get a virus/spyware from some shitty program you've snagged from FlyByNight Shitware than anyone that's bothered to take the time to port their app over to the Mac.

    With this in mind, it's equally easy to run virus/spyware free with Windows, just by being careful.

    - Think Snow Crash. Treat unknown software like a hypodermic needle picked up off the street. You gonna run that? Run software from reputable sources you trust. Don't do warez.

    - Know the software you install. Don't install what you don't need. Strip down your installation, if necessary.

    - Know the difference between programs and data files (if yer a newb). Know which data files contain scripting/macroshit. Disable the scripting functions of every program that views those data files, or use data viewers that don't run those scripting functions.

    - Be up to date on your security patches.

    This basically eliminates your exposure to 90% of virii, simply by not being fucking stupid. You'd get the same results by using a Mac, mostly because Macs don't have a massive shitpile of software to infect yourself from. You're basically practicing these steps anyway.

    The other 10% are either going to fuck you up the ass regardless of what you do, or maybe will be caught by AV software.

  165. Re:Have daughter - SSDD by AetherBurner · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I warned my daughter about the Same Stuff on Different Days. Even had to reinstall Windoze on her system because it was so trashed. I read her the riot act about adding "the goodies" and tied in the third degree with it on top. The next week all of the garbage was back. So, I cleaned the drive again and pulled the network drivers. She has no email, internet, NOTHING. Yes I get the occasional whine and sob about not talking to her friends but I told her, you mess up - you pay. Best fix possible - pull the plug. It also works at the office. Install spyware after a cleaning and warning, your computer loses internet access. It is just ToughNetworkLove.

  166. Spyware and tech support by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 2, Informative
    Most OEM Helpdesks refuse to help the customer uninstall Spyware and Adware. They do not want to get sued by Spyware and Adware makers.

    I found that Spysweeper works better than SpyBot or others. It scans memory and can prevent Spyware and Adware from installing and schedules a regular scan in case they do install.

    If you run an X86 PC system with Windows, There is a solution to the malware problem if you are not too chicken to use it. Buy Crossover Office if you really want to run MS-Office and other MS-Junk. Yes you heard me right, leave that POS called Windows for an OS that does not suffer from such bad malware and security prolems.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  167. We Don't Support That by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Props to the SONY desk ~ML

  168. Training issue / policy by smatt-man · · Score: 1

    My experience as a technician in the business world is that spy war should be more of a training issue than a support issue. The users at my office know they are going to get chewed a new one if I find bonzi buddy and the like on their computer. Our company has a very strick policy about installing software on their computers. Our firewalls and proxies block most everything, plus we don't give users administrative rights to their computers. I rarely find spyware any more, except on the occasional old win98 pc. Companies need to let IT departments get tough on users, instead of bending over backwards for them. I guess that's why I like working where I do.

    --

    ---
    Lousy rotten karmic retribution.
  169. Dam spyware!!! by Celt · · Score: 1

    Have to deal with this every bloody day with customers who phone me, its a pain in the bloody arse!

    #

    --
    "WebTV: bringing the Internet into the shallow end of the gene pool since 1995" - Martin Bishop
  170. Pay Up by Greyfox · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Require an internet license to connect to the Internet, similar to the ham radio license. That would involve users actually having to know a thing or two about their systems.

    The problem here isn't spyware developers. The problem here isn't the Nigerian spammers. The problem here isn't DDOSing skript kiddies taking over thousands of machines on the Internet. The problem here is users who expect to be able to be allowed to be completely ignorant of their extremely complex system while at the same time being protected against the hazards that they will encounter on the Internet.

    The solution is quite simple; force those users to learn the fundamental basics they'll need to protect themselves from all the above hazards, and require them to take a test to determine that they're at least minimally able to protect themselves. Additionally make it easy for a person working in a technical capacity to revoke that license ("I'm revoking your license. If you want it back you'll have to take the class and the test again.")

    Elitist? Is requiring a driver's license so that idiots won't go out and kill people on the road elitist? Is requiring a ham radio license so that people won't go out and interfere with legitimate services elitist? The potential exists to do as much or more damage with the Internet. We can no longer allow users to be blissfully clueless. A license is a public affirmation that they are aware of the responsiblity they take when connecting their computers to the Internet.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Pay Up by Doooh_head · · Score: 1

      Ya and maybe in your world people will be required to have a license to walk down the street, otherwise some shit-head with a sniper rifle might pick you off just for fun!! Elitist?? Hell ya!

      --

      doooh
    2. Re:Pay Up by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      Yeah, just like licensing ham radio has completely shut down amateur experimentation with radio broadcasting and how driving licenses have completely shut down any amateur auto work. It doesn't have to be about the software you're running, any more than your driver's license is about what car you're running.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    3. Re:Pay Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen brother! =D

  171. Re:Centrally managed network enabled spyware remov by markan18 · · Score: 1

    Easy, try nessus. Nessus scans networks for security vulnerabilities and spyware as well. To scan for spyware, it needs remote registry access so give it an account with sufficient priviledges. Just look at the plugins page to see which spyware it can detects.

  172. Want to really nip spyware in the bud? by wturky · · Score: 1

    Just turn off your computer and go out and watch a soccer match or something. GUARANTEED not to get any spyware on your computer that way! O:)

  173. Dell can't remove spyware... by WebCowboy · · Score: 1

    ...not so much because it "has partnerships" with spyware developers, it is because the EULAs of a lot of software like that form Gator, Bonzi Buddy and Kazza Lite grant you use of the software only in conjunction with the spyware and adware components it installs.

    So on essence, Dell could have their asses sued off for assisting its customers in software piracy, DMCA violations and so on. So it's probably on advice of their lawyers to cover their butts by not getting involved in spyware support calls.

  174. Education at the early stage by Ra5pu7in · · Score: 1

    Younger users growing up with computers are much more willing to learn. It may take 15-20 years to work, but educating children who will be the future workforce is more likely to solve the problem eventually than trying to teach the current workforce of people who don't want to learn.

    In the meantime, "Joe, this is the same problem you have reported twice before. I have been helping you as a favor. However, I have explained how to avoid the problem. I will explain it again right now. If you need help with this again, it will cost you an extra US$150 (some outrageous amount they won't want to pay or that you'd be happy to earn to do this repeatedly)." or some similar response that affects their wallet directly may force a few brain cells into action.

    --
    I was taking one day at a time, but then several days got together and ambushed me. (from a Rhymes with Orange comic)
  175. Correction: windows is the #1 support cost/problem by NotZed · · Score: 1

    Get it right guys.

    --
    _ // `Thinking is an exercise to which all too few brains
    \\/ are accustomed' - First Lensman
  176. For dial up 98 users use SP 1.5 by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    Look here for a nice custom patch. I just had to reinstall Windows for someone (not spyware, but just as dumb, they tried to install Win2k over Win98 with the disk scratched all to hell). I start with that, install the the free AVG and then Zone Alarm, Adaware, and spybot. I figure (hope) that'll keep the computer from comming right back to me.

    Still, I wonder how long until Microsoft notices (and sues) this guy (whether what he's doing is legal or not won't matter to good 'ol MS).

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  177. Re:Just run Spybot --- No excuses for Sasser by Phiu-x · · Score: 0
    Whoever wrote Sasser owes me a lunch break, because I had to skip it to deal with infected machines on the line. (Yeah yeah, "You should have patched sooner.)


    Thats what test boxes are used for. You install the patch on the test box and see what happens...

    About the Sasser worm:

    You really should have patched sooner. Eh, if I remember correctly the vulnerability reports appeared on the 13th of April and the exploit came out on the 30th. You had around 15 days to patch your computers and did not do it. Who's fault it is? In that manner, better to get used to skipping lunchtime... What kind of sysadmin are you?

    Regarding Sasser, we where lucky that we had so much time in between the vulnerability reports and the appearance of the worm (the exploit). In many cases it has been much shorter than that. You really have no excuses not to have patched sooner. A good firewall may help too... (it actually prevent the worm to spread itself directly via tcp)

    But since you're relatively new to the field, you (hopefully) WILL learn from these experiences.
    --
    This is a stolen sig.
  178. Its VIRUSES not virii!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get it right.

  179. I only wish it were that simple... by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    users _never_ have their data backed up, they almost never are willing to lose it to a disk image. That's why OEMs love recovery CDs so much; they can easily blow the customer off by saying all they can do is run the restore, but hey, you could call Microsoft and they'll fix it.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I only wish it were that simple... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about:

      1. Partition the disk to seperate the system image from user data.

      2. Clean install, updated to current.

      3. Add Spybot and AdAware. And any AV you prefer, etc.

      4. Back up the system image, Ghost, whatever.

      5. When the time comes to clean up the system again, restore the system partition from backup, and run all the cleaner programs.

      Workable?

  180. Re:Just run Spybot: A Word From The Trenches by EvilSporkMan · · Score: 1

    Personally I think Internet access should be licensed, just like Ham Radio is. And tech support people should be able to revoke that license at any time for any reason. "You installed WHAT?! I'm sorry sir, I'm afraid I'm going to have to revoke your Interent license."
    I know (think, hope?) you're joking, but I just have to point out how bad an idea this is. Licensing will invariably end up in the hands of a corporation or a government entity that listens to corporations, upon which "You installed WHAT?!" will refer to the random piece of OSS the tech support people don't know about or even the stuff they're paid to suppress.

    --
    -insert a witty something-
  181. Takes a little bit more than just that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I took some precautions with my computer to prevent spyware but my roommate managed to mess it up pretty good, since then I have taken the correct steps to ensure protection. This is what I recommend if you want to keep a Windows computer safe from everything without paying for anything.

    Whenever possible enable Automatic Updates for all applications (including Windows itself), if that's not an option update manually on a weekly basis.

    System Protection:

    Only use admin account when necessary.

    Virus/Worm Protection/Removal:

    Install AVG
    Don't use Outlook Express use Thunderbird

    Hacker/Worm Protection:

    Enable XP Firewall (easiest) or Zonealarm or Kerio (my favorite)

    Adware/Spyware/Pop-up Protection:

    Don't use Internet Explorer use **** Frefox ****
    If you have to use IE install the Google Toolbar
    Run Spyware Blaster to give IE &/or Firefox more protection.
    Install Spyware Guard and place in all users startup group to give real-time protection.

    Adware/Spyware Removal:

    Run SpyBot & Ad-Aware
    In my experience each product alone doesn't get rid of everything, using both is the best way to go.

    OR

    Just take the Absolute Cheapest & Most Effective route and install Linux.

    ********
    If you install Firefox you will want the following plugins, use Firefox to download the plugins.

    Shockwave
    Flash
    Java

  182. Re:SELinux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SELinux is the solution. With that you can set all kinds of permissions, such as ability to access the internet (full, limited, or none), file/directory/filetype permissions beyond the standard per user ones, and so on. For example, an mp3 player can be given read only access to mp3 files, read write access only to its own configuration files, write only access to the audio device such as /dev/dsp,, no other file access, no network access, and no other device access. I am hoping that there will be a distro for desktop use based on SELinux or other mandatory access control systems out once 2.6.x stabilizes.

  183. Re:Just run Spybot - Or try Adaware Professional by Rignes · · Score: 1

    I've never used Adaware Professional, only the free Adaware. But, according to the info at http://www.lavasoftusa.com the Pro version support network control of Spyware/Adware. I can't say how easy it is to deploy and manage though.

  184. Re:Correction: windows is the #1 support cost/prob by gregarican · · Score: 1

    Just because it's the #1 OS for mostly-clueless home users. There are security safeguards that *could* prevent spyware from being installed. User-level security has been in place for the NT/2000/XP branch of Windows since Windows NT 3.1 up through Windows XP Professional. This should be equivalent to not running regular Linux sessions logged in as root/superuser. If Windows sessions started out logged on as non-administrator users then spyware couldn't install itself. That plain, that simple.

  185. Mini poll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't mean to troll, but I am very curious about this trend. Many /.-ers here claim to hate spywares and yet, many earn their living dealing with spywares. So, would you recommend or have you recommended Windows PC over linux/Mac OS X/BSD strictly because of the support cost you can make? (Such and such softwares exist only on Windows or you only have Windows skills does not count)

    Be honest! Post anonymously if you have to, and no, I am not interested in lengthy discussions. Just a simple no or yes, I would/I have.

  186. Do people actually follow the Advertisements? by Hippocrates · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Spyware has always baffeled me. I don't see why anyone would ever follow any link that pops up on their desktop. It's annoying, and I just want to close it instead of buying anything from a pop-up company. Is it even a good marketing scheme? ...

  187. Re:Just run Spybot: A Word From The Trenches by mutewinter · · Score: 1

    I have friends who call me up on the phone asking for help. I finally got tired of it, so I put up a website tutorial on removing spyware. I've even made step by step instructions for using Ad-aware and Spybot Search & Destroy. These pages still need alot of work (I actually made them last week), but I think they are a good start. I'm hoping to get some tutorials on other things such as firewalls sooner or later too.

  188. I think so: EULA reform by rhizome · · Score: 1

    Much of the problem with spyware is that EULA's are so arcane and overlooked that it makes it easy for things to be slipped in under the user's nose. Why do EULAs need to be so long? Why are they always in a tiny box that discourages reading it? Is there anything in the legal landscape to simplify all of this? I realize some of the problems are interface/GUI programming issues and some are legalistic maneuvers, but if EULAs weren't so lame and complicated we may have had a safer-computing populace right now.

    --
    When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
  189. auto-update can be considered as mal-ware by zijus · · Score: 1

    My experience was in an environment where we had to maintain many UNIX's and NT's platform in order to certify product on all.

    When one have an "old" NT box for example, all auto-update functionnality can be considered as somehow viruses : without warning it will change your environment. I faced several time our source code control system beeing screwed by those auto-updates, because some common stuff is changed in an incompatible way. The culprit was the... antivirus system. Result : production stoped, manual inevestigation... When you have all you prod automated from compile to package including tests, that's kind of pretty bad effect caused by something pretending to protect you.

    When we look at the end of the day: the ressource is hijacked for non essential activities, not even in reaction to a real problem. That is why I eventually consider many "protections" as mal-ware. Could spybot auto-update be considered like that ?

    I am pretty reluctant in anything changing a machine "automaticaly", even more users installing rubbish on a box.

    I prefer to see myself what is there with www.windowsstartup.com. Hum sure : this does not work if you have to maintain 10s of boxes.

    Probably the best solution is do not use an OS so subject to downgrades, just do not even have the possibility of a problem.

    Ciao ciao.

    The easiest pollution to clean is the one not generated.

  190. Sysedit by T-Kir · · Score: 1

    Also, try running the program 'sysedit.exe' and it'll popup with the older style text config files (config.sys, autoexec.bat, win.ini & system.ini)... look in these for any suspicious proggies. I've seen some viruses/spyware add themselves into here so they can respread if you've just taken them out of the registry/startup folder.

    --
    Are you local? There's nothing for you here!
  191. Pick Your Poison: Ad-Aware or Spybot by crashnbur · · Score: 1

    Ad-Aware with Ad-Watch is my personal choice, which requires either the "Plus" ($26.95) or "Professional" ($39.95) edition. You'll have to go through the "Tweak" options to set Ad-Watch to run win Windows starts and start in blocking mode, but once its up -- you don't have to worry about ad/spy-ware much anymore. Just run a comprehensive Ad-Aware scan every week or two, and check the results list to make sure nothing useful is being flagged as spyware! Oh, and Ad-Aware's free version (that does not come with Ad-Watch) is a very effective scanner/cleaner, but it will not stop ad/spy-ware from infiltrating your system -- it can only remove it after the fact, which often requires several minutes (or even hours?) of tweaking after their removal.

    Spybot Search & Destroy is my second choice, and except for its tendency to treat files quarantined by Ad-Aware as spyware (well, they are, but they're quarantined!) and to miss a few items that Ad-Aware finds, Spybot is very capable of keeping your PC (mostly) clean. But here's the catch: Spybot is freeware, so it is much more cost-effective than Ad-Aware, but remember the old addage: "You get what you pay for."

    I've used both Ad-Aware (more extensively) and Spybot (somewhat extensively) for several months, and here's my suggestion: use Spybot or Ad-Aware's free version at home if your files aren't "top secret" or otherwise crucial to anyone's survival; use Ad-Aware Plus or Professional on business computers (where the company will pay for the license) or if you want to protect your computer from gathering ad/spy-ware in the first place.

    There are other options out there, and remember that nothing is perfect... Some legitimate things will be deleted if you're not careful, and some illegitimate things will sneak through no matter how careful you are. The ad/spy-ware-war only marks our attempts to stay ahead of the game.

    1. Re:Pick Your Poison: Ad-Aware or Spybot by crashnbur · · Score: 1

      Note to self: use the "Preview" option.

  192. Re:Just run Spybot: A Word From The Trenches by superflippy · · Score: 1

    Sounds to me like someone needs to build freeware or shareware spyware-free clone of Weatherbug, Comet Cursor, etc.

    --
    Your fantasies contain the seeds of important concepts.
  193. DELL TECH SUPPORT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    would someone tell the dell execs to quit f'in telling their customers to call their ISP and say its their problem? then again, they do that for *ANYTHING*

  194. Pick Your Poison: Ad-Aware or Spybot by crashnbur · · Score: 2, Informative

    Repost of this comment, with fixed links. (Mod the other one down!)

    * * *

    Ad-Aware with Ad-Watch is my personal choice, which requires either the "Plus" ($26.95) or "Professional" ($39.95) edition. You'll have to go through the "Tweak" options to set Ad-Watch to run win Windows starts and start in blocking mode, but once its up -- you don't have to worry about ad/spy-ware much anymore. Just run a comprehensive Ad-Aware scan every week or two, and check the results list to make sure nothing useful is being flagged as spyware! Oh, and Ad-Aware's free version (that does not come with Ad-Watch) is a very effective scanner/cleaner, but it will not stop ad/spy-ware from infiltrating your system -- it can only remove it after the fact, which often requires several minutes (or even hours?) of tweaking after their removal.

    Spybot Search & Destroy is my second choice, and except for its tendency to treat files quarantined by Ad-Aware as spyware (well, they are, but they're quarantined!) and to miss a few items that Ad-Aware finds, Spybot is very capable of keeping your PC (mostly) clean. But here's the catch: Spybot is freeware, so it is much more cost-effective than Ad-Aware, but remember the old addage: "You get what you pay for."

    I've used both Ad-Aware (more extensively) and Spybot (somewhat extensively) for several months, and here's my suggestion: use Spybot or Ad-Aware's free version at home if your files aren't "top secret" or otherwise crucial to anyone's survival; use Ad-Aware Plus or Professional on business computers (where the company will pay for the license) or if you want to protect your computer from gathering ad/spy-ware in the first place.

    There are other options out there, and remember that nothing is perfect... Some legitimate things will be deleted if you're not careful, and some illegitimate things will sneak through no matter how careful you are. The ad/spy-ware-war only marks our attempts to stay ahead of the game.

  195. Just Run Linix! by VonMarschall · · Score: 1

    Hey, go to http://www.linspire.com. Purchase Linspire. It is the best and easiest distribution of Linux out there! Then say goodbye to spyware. :-)

    1. Re:Just Run Linix! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should I take advice from someone that doesn't even know how to spell "Linux".

  196. Is linux to blame? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

    >I don't understand why Apple's market share hasn't soared thanks to this and other similar advantages.

    I'm betting a lot of potential Mac buyers are first introduced to linux as the "other OS," and thankfully re-install XP after the 80th time they've typed su or edited a 20 page config file written by CS majors for CS majors.

    Linux advocates really need to realize that they're acting like a third-party spoiler when someone wants something simple to use. I don't see how installing what is essentially a server OS is a "MS killer" especially when Apple makes a product designed for people sick of windows.

    Ideally, Linux advocates should be advocating Macs for non-techies. Instead, I see way too much mindless Apple bashing here and we wonder why MS is so dominant. For these reasons, when someone says they're a mac owner its the equivalant system shock of hearing "I'm a scientologist!"

    Lets put the rhetoric and idealism to rest and push Apple products to those who need them.

  197. Maybe.... by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    That might work if you can keep you're users from saving stuff to C:. I guess you could move system folders like User's Profile folder to another device. What I really want is an honest to God /home dir, complete with no write access for other directories on the system. Users shouldn't even have the option to throw their files all over the drive. If this could be done though, I'd think Dell/Gateway/etc would be doing it. The problem probably goes back to the fact that you need admin rights under Windows to do most anything beyond Office apps/Web apps. Still, maybe it can be done, and Dell/Gateway/me are all just too lazy.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  198. Or... by ThousandStars · · Score: 1
    The ultimate spyware removal tool may cost some extra amount of cash, but I recommend it to my family members: Apple.

    I run Win XP Pro because I need Lotus Word Pro and Access, neither of which run native on Apple; but I don't help others support Windows. It takes too much time.

  199. Re:on a read-only filesystem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Run Firefox, on Linux (custom secure install, which has security patches installed daily), on a read-only filesystem. Pretty darn secure. I'd be impressed by anyone that could infect it. ;)

    Wouldn't be very useful in the real world though. You'd have little more than a bulky, expensive WebTV box.

  200. CWWWSearch by Buzz_Litebeer · · Score: 1

    I also got a "bad" version of CW, here is how to get rid of it. STart ad-aware start spybot start cw shredder (do not execute their cleaning) hit ctrl + shift + esc, this will bring up task manager. Browse Processes and turn of all instances of internet explorer and "explorer.exe" Now run ad-aware, run spybot, then run cwshredder. explore the windows directory and delete the random folders created by cool www search, i think they all have random naems with a common "msiesh.dll" file./ After that is finished, restart the computer, and it should be gone. This was what finally got rid of it on my worst case scenario.

    --
    If you don't vote, you don't matter, so don't waste your time telling me your opinion
  201. ObSwan by AkkarAnadyr · · Score: 1


    I t'ink he ... he looka lika man.

    --

    I bought this house and you know I'm boss
    Ain't no h'aint gonna run me off

  202. Here's a tip for your ISP. by Gldm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I was working in phone support for a major ISP one of the biggest problems we had was people wouldn't call in about spyware problems until their machines were SO hosed they couldn't even GET to the sites to download removal tools. So eventually I started bugging my supervisor and various higher ups until we put spybot in a small public ftp that we all memorized the IP adress of. That way when the users called in, what we'd do is have them open a command prompt, and walk them through an ftp on the command line to get the file. Sure it'd take 5 minutes to explain all the crap to type in, but it's way better than the usual "Wait I can't see the link anymore, there's a popup. Let me close it. Ok there's 3 popups, I'll close them. Ok wait I'll just reboot" etc that'd take half an hour. Command line ftp doesn't trigger all the resident hijack crap because it doesn't use the browser.

    --

    Introducing the new Occam Fusion! Now with sqrt(-1) fewer blades!

    1. Re:Here's a tip for your ISP. by devphaeton · · Score: 1

      When I was working in phone support for a major ISP one of the biggest problems we had was people wouldn't call in about spyware problems until their machines were SO hosed they couldn't even GET to the sites to download removal tools. So eventually I started bugging my supervisor and various higher ups until we put spybot in a small public ftp that we all memorized the IP adress of. That way when the users called in, what we'd do is have them open a command prompt, and walk them through an ftp on the command line to get the file. Sure it'd take 5 minutes to explain all the crap to type in...

      Egads that is so true- they won't call until the machine is borked. I've got one behind me i've been working on for 3 days because something has completely jacked the socket and TCP/IP stacks.. You get about 7 minutes to work with it before all the memory leaks of all the programs (i counted 37 in the Add/Remove Programs) use up the available mem and crash the machine. This one's probably just going to get re-imaged (which is a whole nuther bucket of snakes), as the bossman has negotiated to repair this machine for free. It's so jacked that i can't FTP anything with it either, and it doesn't have a floppy drive, and i don't have a CD burner on my workstation, sooo....

      Thanks for the suggestion (about FTP dir) but i've already got that going ;)

      I actually need to talk to my bossman because i'm using *my* FTP directory for this. I don't have a disk quota (it's a perk) but i've still got almost 200MB of MS service packs, virus removal tools, adware removal products, Mozilla and Firebird (gotta update that) browsers, Thunderbird mail client, etc etc.... all the crap that people *really* should be able to figure out how to find and download on their own but either can't or won't.

      We're one of the few ISPs that actually give a shit and *try* to help people but it's getting harder and harder. These days i don't blame some of the other ISPs that won't spend any time on people, much less the ones that are a stone in your shoe every other week.

      Another interesting thing i'm discovering, is that there is a small segment of ppl that get all sorts of crap on their computer (and spam), and *don't* call, they just jump ship to a different provider, thinking that will help. I'd say that in the last 50 customers i've set up, probably 35 of them had Blaster, or huge amounts of fuckware on their machine, or both. And *usually*, these are the people who don't say "thank you" after you've spent 3 hours cleaning up their machine for them.

      They seem to just expect it to be done for $20.95/month.

      --


      do() || do_not(); // try();
    2. Re:Here's a tip for your ISP. by Gldm · · Score: 1

      Hmm, sounds like that one you're working on might have a winsock error, I'd see them every now and then. There's a registry fix over on MS's site but it's a pain in the ass, usually better to just reimage it.

      My latest problem is actually on my own system. It absolutely will not let me go to windows update. It just keeps giving me an "Administrator's Only" page saying I'm not logged in as an admin. But I am. Even when I log in as administrator as in the official account. There was some fix instructions from MS for this bug, but after doing them it didn't work. So now I just have to try and remember what patches I'm supposed to download and go find them manually, which is a bitch.

      --

      Introducing the new Occam Fusion! Now with sqrt(-1) fewer blades!

  203. Re:Just run Spybot: A Word From The Trenches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody really cares about outsourcing tech support jobs. It's that companies are outsourcing stuff that requires more knowledge/creativity/expertise that is bad. And most companies have to learn the hard way that outsourcing that stuff is a huge and costly mistake. I wish that our helpdesk would be outsourced. They are simply incompetent.

  204. Symantec Corp Ed v9 by bizitch · · Score: 1

    Symantec Corp Ed v9 (when released) is supposed to begin treating spyware/malware etc as a Virus - complete with signature updates and centrallized policy management ...

    I know I'm cranked about it ..

    --
    ---- "Logoff! That cookie shit makes me nervous!" - A. Soprano
    1. Re:Symantec Corp Ed v9 by ballsmccoy · · Score: 0

      Has been out for some time and we are running it here, I have yet to come across this functionality.

      So don't jerk off just yet

    2. Re:Symantec Corp Ed v9 by bizitch · · Score: 1

      ru sure - v9?

      Symantec told me it was just released - and it may be renamed to groupware something something

      Check out this link

      http://enterprisesecurity.symantec.com/products/ pr oducts.cfm?ProductID=64

      --
      ---- "Logoff! That cookie shit makes me nervous!" - A. Soprano
    3. Re:Symantec Corp Ed v9 by ballsmccoy · · Score: 0

      Yes, migrated to it last Sunday. Oh well, maybe next time.

    4. Re:Symantec Corp Ed v9 by ballsmccoy · · Score: 0

      Well shit, it looks like I can configure it to do that, doesn't look as thurough as ad-aware but at least its something.

      Fuck yeah! (William Zabka yell - mean kid from Karate Kid, Rad, Just one of the guys - the premere asshole from the 80's)

    5. Re:Symantec Corp Ed v9 by youngec · · Score: 1

      YES SAV 9.0 was released April 12 and I know several customers have it already. It's already available on Warez sites.

      It took Symantec long enuf! It still sucks because it doesn't detect "expanded threats" unless you do a full/scheduled scan (i.e. realtime on-access scanner will not detect them).

      McAfee VirusScan Enterprise has been able to detect spyware/adware and other "unwanted programs" for over a year.

      Furthermore, WTF!! Why didn't Symantec's CORPORATE product have the ability to detect this stuff before or at the same time as their HOME product? NAV2004 has had "expanded threat" detection since its release in Sept 2003.

  205. I think it's odd too by swb · · Score: 1

    ...it's a huge growth opportunity for them, and in many ways is such a natural for their scanning engines that they would have to do very little to even begin supporting it other than adding spyware definitions.

    That they haven't makes me speculate that they might fear repercussions from other industry partners that like the spyware concept, albeit slightly less malevolently, and don't want to see it totally mooted by AV companies, or if perhaps they've felt pressure from larger clients who are involved in spyware either directly or indirectly.

    It's probably conspiratorial to speculate on that, but there aren't a lot of logical reasons why they *wouldn't* want to do spyware removal, especially in a premium product.

  206. Re:Just run Spybot: A Word From The Trenches by pla · · Score: 1

    THEY WILL REFUSE TO LET YOU HELP THEM
    Doesn't stop them from still calling you up


    ...For which, I have a fairly standard response:
    "Run both SpyBot and AdAware. Let them delete everything they flag as suspicious. If this includes a program you use, you have two choices. Either find an alternative that SpyBot and AdAware don't detect, or stop asking me for help - If you actually want spyware, I can't help you anyway".

    That about covers it. Some people may not like that attitude, but TFB. I consider my time a lot more valuable than their ability to know the current weather without a quick visit to weather.com, and will tell people as much.

    In my experience, if a person's machine has started behaving poorly enough to prompt a call to me, they will welcome and thank me for cleaning their machines, even if I do end up killing a program or two that they actually use. I have yet to hear someone complain that their machine feels about 10x faster at the expense of their pretty cursors.


    Now, the more negotiable grey area, IMO, involves what loads at startup. I personally tend to disable everything that I can manually load when I need to actually use something. That includes most printer and display "control panels", Palm's hotsync manager (or similar app for other handhelds), most multimedia apps' quick-start features (Netscape, QuickTime, Real, etc). If a person really does use that functionality very frequently, fine, they can keep it. Otherwise, they waste memory, meaning they don't really speed up loading, they slow down everything. Not a net gain, IMO.

  207. Tabbed browsing "in" I.E. by jhurani · · Score: 1

    Firefox only has two advantages over IE+google toolbar: Tabbed Browsing (which i'm starting to like), and security. Until recently, they weren't reason enough to switch. Now, they are.

    This is a bit off-topic, but if you have this exe - C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\Help\dexplore.exe (Microsoft Document Explorer) - on your machine (I guess it comes with MSDN?), then you can use it to browse. It will use the IE rendering, and will have tabs, and you can even customize the hotkeys. Somehow I find it faster than IE ;).

  208. No good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have to remember that most of this spyware installs itself via social engineering. All you have to do is write some stupid game that downloads ads while getting the high score list, and you can compromise millions of machines.

    As with all social engineering attacks, there is no technological solution. The only way to stop them is to do what works in meatspace -- prosecute the perpetrators for fraud/larceny/whatever. That way, any software that doesn't explicitly spell out all of its "features" is liable for fraud and whatever else the user "agreed" to.

    aQazaQa

  209. Re:Just run Spybot: A Word From The Trenches by PitaBred · · Score: 1

    I've found that it works better having another job and doing tech support as a side thing. That way I can be the emotionally abusive one and it won't affect my bottom line terribly.

  210. No good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All it takes is for the spyware to call itself WINLOGON.EXE, and you won't know it's bad. In fact, Task Manager will refuse to kill it if its name is services.exe, smss.exe, winlogon.exe, or csrss.exe.

    aQazaQa

  211. wmplayer.exe - me too. Here's how to kill it by Weaselmancer · · Score: 4, Informative

    I had no idea I got it until I ran adaware. Then I got some freaking spyware bug that deleted windows media player and replaced it with a spyware app or a virus or something.

    I just fought that one off last night. Took forever to nail it down. Here's what finally worked.

    Delete the wmplayer.exe in Program Files/Windows Media Player. Run ad-aware 6 with the latest definitions. That'll zap the crap that it installs, which for me was windows/a.exe and windows/system32/bridge.dll, along with a host of other reg keys and crap.

    Because it's windows, reboot and run the scanner again. If it finds anything, repeat.

    If you're lucky, you'll still have a working copy of wmplayer.exe in windows/system32/dllcache. You'll know it's the good copy if it's larger than around 6k or so.

    Hope this helps, because this one was a total pain in the ass to track down. Good thing my machine is dual boot Linux. And my main windows browser is now Firefox, too.

    Oh yeah, on a side note... Whoever wrote the scumware that overwrites Windows Media Player needs to be hung by a pair of thumb screws and roasted over a coal fire. It's one thing to sneak your apps onto a system, but another thing entirely to overwrite existing apps.

    Here's hoping their crap gets noticed on some FBI computer somewhere.

    Weaselmancer

    PS: Just in case there's a friendly FBI guy reading this, take the scumware wmplayer.exe into a Linux install and run "strings" on it. You'll see the URL of the fine folks who brought you this plague. They encrypt their strings by inserting 4 garbage characters over 0x80 every so often, so ignore those.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  212. Free doesn't mean inferior... by aksansai · · Score: 1
    Spybot Search & Destroy is my second choice, and except for its tendency to treat files quarantined by Ad-Aware as spyware (well, they are, but they're quarantined!) and to miss a few items that Ad-Aware finds, Spybot is very capable of keeping your PC (mostly) clean. But here's the catch: Spybot is freeware, so it is much more cost-effective than Ad-Aware, but remember the old addage: "You get what you pay for."
    Remember when Ad-Aware stopped putting out updates? Spybot, a project done by a person who wanted to weed out their system of treacherous spyware, continued to produce updates. Spybot S&D is an extremely effective application that is free, continually updated, and very powerful in the tasks that it does. It also contains some nice "advanced" options to eliminate the need to go into the registry to clear out some unnecessary things that slow your computer down.

    Ad-Aware is a viable product, now. I am not claiming that Spybot is superior to Ad-Aware. I'm merely saying that Spybot gets the job done very well, at a price that cannot be beat.
    --
    Ayup
    1. Re:Free doesn't mean inferior... by crashnbur · · Score: 1

      Ad-Aware has a free version.

      And no, I do not remember when they stopped putting out updates. I didn't start using it extensively until version 6.0.162. Before that, I just toyed with it here and there without taking it seriously.

  213. But... by SirTreveyan · · Score: 1

    its a hell of a lot of work to keep the Windows updates up-to-date, not to mention the anti-virus sigs, the ad-aware, spy bot and the Spyware blaster all updated too.

    I have one machine at home that I must keep Windows on due to work requirements, and I spend more time administering that box in a week than I do on my other four Linux boxes in a year combined. Its a bitch when work requires you to have certain software then says its up to you to support it. Damn...I guess its time to find me a new employer.

    --

    SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0

    0 rows returned

  214. Move away from IE browser. by zanthas · · Score: 0

    If you switch to Opera, firefox, Mozilla,etc many of the spyware problems disappear (and a large number of virus problems as well). I know it sucks to have to train the staff and hide the IE web browser. But as someone already said "Why infect the small 5%?"

  215. Finding vs Installing by nuggz · · Score: 1

    Finding it is easy.
    Simply not installing it is also easy.

  216. Proxy! by big+daddy+kane · · Score: 1

    this calls for a well configured proxy to block all sites deemed unworthy, im not for internet censorship, but in the case of security its essential. just make sure you blacklist the corresponding ip's of sites you really want to keep users out of, beucase just accessing a site that way will bypass the restrictions.

  217. Common Sense Exclusion Field generator by SysKoll · · Score: 1
    Eth1, I second that. Want further proof? Look at this Wired article about spyware. To quote:

    "I was annoyed by these pop-ups," [Portal of Evil's webmaster] Faliszek said. He started digging, but ran into a wall of shadows, denials and false trails. He thinks the problem of sneaky programs like VX2 is growing, and something needs to be done. "Self-policing isn't working," he said. "I hate to say we need government intervention, but something needs to be done."

    So let me get this straight: This guy is quoted by a sympathetic journalist and clamors for new regulations, laws, an army of civil servants to enforce them, and the matching tax levying, all of that for his God-given right to use IE under Windows instead of, Heaven forbid, using Mozilla or a non-Windows machine.

    At this degree of cluelessness, the words "dribbling idiots" are pitifully unadequate. May I suggest "drooling fuzzbrain"?

    --

    --
    Mad science! Robots! Underwear! Cute girls! Full comic online! http://www.girlgeniusonline.com/

  218. Clippy by eudas · · Score: 1

    "Sure thing, Skipper!"

    Heh. Ubersoft.net rocks. =)

    eudas

    --
    Blessed is he who expects the worst, for he shall not be disappointed.
  219. Slightly OT: Spyware developers as Install Gurus? by rdmiller3 · · Score: 1
    It just occurred to me recently that the people who code the installers for spyware have an extremely valuable skill. Their success depends upon making their install so utterly automatic and unobtrusive that the user oftentimes doesn't even realize that anything has been installed at all.

    Don't you wish the software you want could install so easily?

  220. Spywareinfo.com by Tuxedo+Jack · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You think spyware's bad? Take a look at the "cool web search and other malware removal" forum on SWI.

    http://www.spywareinfo.com/forums

    Hell, just because of that crap that people push out, I keep a USB pindrive (yes, it's the "devil duck" one from ThinkGeek) filled with utilities:

    - Spybot (can be run without installing!)
    - Ad-Aware 6 installer and new reference file
    - Stinger
    - CWShredder
    - AVG installer and license code
    - ZoneAlarm installer
    - TheKillBox (can delete _ANY_ file - even ones in use)
    - PV (used to detect new versions of CWS that tie themselves to winlogon.exe as well as explorer.exe and can't be removed without DOS or the Recovery Console)
    - Firefox and K-Meleon installers

    Suffice it to say, my life is rather busy thanks to those bastards who make this.

    If I had my way, I'd take them out into the street, then let each and every person who was inconvenienced by their software throw one ball at them.

    I.E. shotputs.

    --

    Striking fear in the authors of godawful fanfiction, I am here, appearing in darkness, Tuxedo Jack!
  221. One Removal Tool to Rule Them All by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sysinternals Freeware AUTORUNS Applet.

    Allows manual removal of anything and everything you don't want.


    Without question, worth the $0 it costs to download.
    http://www.sysinternals.com/ntw2k/freeware/autorun s.shtml

  222. Command line tool? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, I may be silly even posting this, when no one is probably reading this thread anymore, but are there any spyware removal software packages that run silently from a command line?

  223. 'Autoruns' shows you what is started at boot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use 'autoruns' from http://www.sysinternals.com/ntw2k/freeware/autorun s.shtml. It finds everything that starts automatically.

  224. when you administer dozens, hundreds, thousands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Must Consult Someone Else
    Must Consult Someone Experienced
    Either will do in this situation. I have 30+K boxen to take care of and I don't have this problem. On the other hand I didn't get my job by having a lovely collection of MS placemats.

    sorry about the flamage it is just that admins who do not know what they are doing bother me. Patching, updating VSCAN, pushing uot apps, etc, all of this can be automated.

    I depend on the powers of AC to prevent karma damage.

  225. Spyware *Prevention* by superyooser · · Score: 1
  226. Cheap Help to remove spyware. by Darthmalt · · Score: 1

    I'm just wondering instead of waisting trained and experienced IT personnel removing spyware. Why don't companies hire tech savvy college students to remove it? It'd be cheap and free up IT for other things. After all how much know how des it take to run spybot and adaware from Win XP and 98?

  227. Don't Use IE, Don't download crap! by simetra · · Score: 1

    Really... Using IE and downloading and installing all sorts of crap is how spyware gets on a computer. These jackass users need to realize that they're not the victim, they're a willing participant. And they should be slapped too.

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
  228. HiJackThis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really like HijackThis. In addition to listing all the startup processes, it also lists all BHO, DPFs and Windows/IE settings used to hijack your browser... It's an awesome tool. I use it along with Spybot S&D and that seems to solve 99.99% of spyware issues.

  229. Run as Power User by superyooser · · Score: 1
    Make a Power User account.
    1. Go to Control Panel, Administrative Tools, Computer Management.
    2. In the left pane, see System Tools -> Local Users and Groups -> Users, Groups.
    Make a user account a member of the Power Users group. This gives you a predefined set of user rights between the Users and Administrators groups.

    If you know exactly what restriction is getting in your way, you can enable that right for your account type.

    1. Go to Control Panel, Administrative Tools, Local Security Settings.
    2. In the left pane, see Local Policies -> User Rights Assignment.
    To do this more quickly, if you find what changes are being made in the registry, you could make two .reg files: one to turn it on and the other to turn it off. But you have to run them as an administrator. So, right-click on the .reg file, and Run As... Administrator (or other account with administrative privileges).
  230. Sorry, but no shit by youngec · · Score: 1

    We realized this over a year ago. It's about time AV vendors stepped up to the plate to help eliminate this junk. It's embarrassing that some products such as Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition could do -nothing- about these new threats until their recent 9.0 release. In contrast, McAfee's VirusScan Enterprise has been able to detect "unwanted programs" since their 7.0 release over 1 year ago (April 2003). I think Symantec's stance was something like: "it's not anti-threat, it's anti-virus! Go buy Symantec Client Security". Total BS. Their consumer Norton Antivirus 2004 product was better than their corporate product!

  231. Re:Just run Spybot: A Word From The Trenches by CrashPoint · · Score: 1

    The smothering of OSS is a small price to pay if I can arbitrarily deny someone the ability to access the Internet forever, even if only once.

  232. Taskmanager by AsmordeanX · · Score: 1

    You really need to use a thridparty task manager. A lot of newer spyware programs and keyloggers can hide from the MS version but fail to recognize a thridparty viewer like Codestuff Starter (which also happens to show you all the Run keys in the same app)

  233. Sounds like 'Trusted Computing' on steroids... by Abraxis · · Score: 1

    ... and you better believe that if this sort of thing ever gets implemented by Micrsoft or the like that it would sound like this:

    "Media player agent only allowed to operate if the media it is trying to play is approved by Record Company Cartel..."

    A good concept in theory... I just fear what corporate interests would do to such a design (and then force down greater public's throat through monopolistic practices).

  234. Hardly by Kris_J · · Score: 1
    Whacking malware is a fun diversion from the sometimes tedious coding that I spend much of my time doing. It gets me up from my desk and it keeps me at someone elses just long enough to have a conversation, but not so long that they feel the need to go and do something else. A quick AdAware scan, a dive into the registry, a check of the add/remove programs list and finally a reboot and we're all good again.

    The worst, as in most annoying when it happens, tech support problem is viruses. I don't think I have a worst as in most common problem.

  235. FFR! by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

    This is easily solved by the standard tech support answer!

    fdisk
    format
    re-install
    (doo-dah, doo-dah)

    Seriously, I don't see how this problem really affects hell desk employees since they're not allowed to support anything but the software the machine was shipped with.

  236. Wrong by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    All spyware does is execute as normal software. Nothing special about it. By the very fact that OS-X can execute software, it can execute spyware. Spyware is just an app that runs in the background (OS-X supports this) that watches what you do (OS-X supports this) and then uses the network to report it (OS-X supports this). It's not like a virus that breaks in through a hole, users willingly install it. Sometimes as part of an app they want (Kazaa) or sometimes by itself because they like something it does (Bonzi Buddy).

    Thus there is no prevention for it, under current OS design models. If users can install software, they can install spyware.

  237. Yes it can by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    Spyware does NOT come in via exploits, it comes right in the front door. The users downloads and installs a program which, as part of the install process, installs spyware. Most even TELL you they are doing this. Kazaa is the best example. It installs about 6 peices of spyware, and notifies you it is doing so. If you remove any of them, it stops working.

    OS-X cannot provide any defense against this since this is a USER INITATED install. The user WANTS to install the software. If it requires root, no problem, it'll ask when it installs. They'll say yes since they want to install the app.

    Spyware isn't a virus, it doesn't prey on exploits, it preys on users. They either don't know or don't care about it's ill effects and so install it anyhow. Some even markets itself. Comet Cursor is software that is spyware, but people actively seek out and install since they like the dorky cursors it gives them.

  238. Family members who own PCs by CrazyJim0 · · Score: 1

    First it was problems setting up software or getting the printer to work.

    When my mom asks me about her spyware problem, I can't answer. I just say that she almost shouldn't be on the internet anymore.

  239. IF IT AIN'T BROKE, DON'T FIX IT !!! by youngec · · Score: 1

    If you are using this mentality, then YES, Spyware/Adware is probably kicking your ass right now. Stupidest mentality EVER. Can't believe techs still use it.

  240. Bart's PE is a great Windows Boot CD by WoTG · · Score: 2, Informative

    Too bad my mod points expired...

    I'll vouch for Bart's PE as a great tool. It does take a while to assemble and build your boot CD - for licensing issues, you can't just "download an ISO". But, if you're looking for a way to easily get your friends and family off your back... this is a good way to go.

    There are extra benefits to using a boot CD versus a regular software install of anti-spyware. Since you're not booting from the hard drive, there's no chance for spyware launch "watcher" processes to prevent anti-spyware programs from installing or launching. While you're at it, you might as well pop a virus scanner on the CD, for similar reasons.

    As an aside, even though Bart's PE should have perfect NTFS abilities, when it comes to recovering data from damaged filesystems, Knoppix often works better - probably because it mounts read-only or something.

  241. It is a nightmare in the corporate environment too by gone.fishing · · Score: 1

    I provide support in a corporate environment where a percentage of our users have local administrator rights on their Win2K boxes. They have these rights for legitamate, valid business reasons and most of them are computer savy people. Yet they get infected with spyware on a regular basis. Often enough they tell me that it just happens. I have to believe in a certain percentage of cases, this is true. Other times, they are fooled in to installing it.

    It interfers with some of their business software and God only knows what information this adware is pulling and using. I hate the stuff. I also hate to re-image the computers but have started to form the opinion that this may actually be the best course of action to take. Why do I feel this way? Because when I re-image the computer, it stayes spyware free a bit longer. I'm pretty sure that this is partly a social factor. When I tell the user that I had to tear it down and start over again, I think they are more careful.

  242. Re:Just run Spybot: A Word From The Trenches by c0bw3b · · Score: 1

    "i need to find a new job" is an understatement.

    I'm right there with you, brother. I work for *gasp* Comcast. The rash of anti-Comcast articles here aren't helping me feel good about my job.

    --
    ||:|::
  243. c'mon, share by obtuse · · Score: 1

    What are the others? Yeah, I could make a bunch up, but I'm really interested in what other people find useful.

    I'm working in a school, so my best tools are Bart's Network disk with ghost on it, (all NICs except the ones with no DOS drivers, for that I'm working on ghost32) and chntpw.

    The aggressive firewalling, censorware and AV ensure that most of the problems are intentional mischief.

    Remarkable how destructive bored adolescents can be. I guess that's one reason the military loves 'em.

    --
    Assembly is the reverse of disassembly.
    1. Re:c'mon, share by Ummagumma · · Score: 1

      Here is a list of all the software I keep on the CD:

      Spybot
      Adaware
      SpywareGuard (javacoolsoft.com)
      SpywareBlaster (javacoolsoft.com)
      Stinger Antivirus scanner (mcafee.com)
      ie-spyad (http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~ehowes/resource.htm)
      hijackthis (http://www.spychecker.com/program/hijackthis.html )
      zonealarm (for personal machines, not corporate ones)
      CWShredder (http://www.spywareinfo.com/~merijn/cwschronicles. html#cwshredder)

      I find the combo of all this software takes care of 99.99% of the spyware/adware/viruses currently making the rounds.

      Anything you find particularly useful you'd like to share?

      Thanks!

      --
      "The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." - Thomas Jefferson
  244. Word From a Technician's Mouth by Compu+Tech · · Score: 1

    Spyware and adware is 80% of the clientel we getv at our computer repair shop. As for removing it we use a bootable windows cd With SpyBot S$D and Adaware on it.

  245. ! ! ! NEWS FLASH ! ! ! by serutan · · Score: 1

    Most of the world's problems are caused by the behavior of assholes.

    I think people convicted of crimes should be indentured afterwards to pay the social cost. For example, burglars should pay part of their income into a fund to provide everybody with locks and burglar alarms. Spammers should pay for part of my bandwidth, and spyware makers should pay for free tech support. It's not about an eye for an eye, it's about behaving like a grownup and cleaning up your own mess.

  246. Dell, HP, are the solution by poofyhairguy82 · · Score: 1

    I've seen a lot of people in this thread ask why anitvirus companies don't go after spyware. What I wonder is why don't computer makers go after spyware. Tech support at Dell and HP must have tons of problems with spyware, but since they don't want to tell them to download another company's product like Spybot it is impossible for them to solve their customer's problems. They should ship PCs with their own spyware removing software just so that their tech support doesn't have to look worthless.

  247. my utilities by obtuse · · Score: 1

    Thanks! Here's my list. The stuff I carry is usually for cases where I can't access the network or hardware. If the machine sees the network, I've got it made.

    I mentioned these two, but here are details.

    chntpw, reset NT/2k/XP passwords with the full bootable floppy version.

    Bart's network boot disk built into a 2.88 meg image allows a huge load of network drivers, and with a copy of ghost I don't ever have to mess with building boot floppies for ghost again. I also included basic DOS utilities for manipulating the HDD and testing.

    Bootable CDs with floppy images can be useful, and Bart provides a handy utility for building them. Put a disk image of chntpw on a bootable CD with other goodies per instructions at Bart's site.

    I also carry Knoppix or perhaps a nice Bootable Business Card with lots of network drivers. With read-only NTFS access and networking, I've stripped data off of drives I couldn't even access for a fresh NT/2k install. Pour it across the network, and you're a hero. Also good for a slow clone with dd, or an emergency Remote Desktop Client. If you pick a livecd with a nice recent version of kparted, you can resize live NTFS partitions (I used SystemRescueCD). I've needed to do this more often than I'd have expected. Knoppix's NTFS tools were less useful at the time.



    I'm looking forward to using the Captive NTFS drivers, but that seems less neccessary with one more set of tools from Bart's site, the bootable XP/2000 pre-execution environment in BartPE. These allow full access to NTFS, as well as providing an environment you can run Adaware and other Windows tools from. One of these made my day last week. It's dog slow to boot, but running Adaware or other utils (chkdsk, AV, undelete), from NOT the boot drive is great.

    --
    Assembly is the reverse of disassembly.
  248. How to keep Ad-aware up to date offline by Quizo69 · · Score: 1

    To install Ad-aware and have it be up to date from the start, have a version of it on a known good machine, update that, then copy the reflist.ref file from your Lavasoft Ad-aware directory to your installer program location on CD or wherever.

    After installing Ad-aware, copy the updated reflist.ref over to the install directory (make sure it is not set to Read Only if copying from CD), overwrite the old version and then run Ad-aware itself. It will have the latest reflist ready to go for you without needing to get online.

  249. Ack! QtParted not KPartEd. by obtuse · · Score: 1

    Not KParted, QtParted. My apologies to the developers of QtParted, you've got a great tool.

    QtParted is great for resizing live NTFS partitions.

    Aaargh!

    --
    Assembly is the reverse of disassembly.
  250. Re:Just Run Linux! by VonMarschall · · Score: 1

    It was an accident DUMB ASS!

  251. Hmmmm by rofthorax · · Score: 1

    That's to get the creditors off their backs for the other 87% which probably have to do with the $440 for a P4-2.66Mhz machine.. Hey they are making them in China anyhow.. Could this be how the spyware is getting in?

    --
    Just say no to license servers!!
  252. Spyware is telemarketing of the 21st century by Phazz666 · · Score: 0

    Don't you just hate when you get calls from telemarketers at the most inappropriate times (any time in fact). They are a pain. Well it looks like the pain is now chronic. Spyware is the new age telemarketing without your knowledge. Big Brother is watching and really is more like a Big Bother. Its programs such as Kazaa that ruin your computer. Along with the fact your running windows but thats another story. Its like when did surfing the internet turn into an invasion of privacy.

  253. Alternative solution by NineWives · · Score: 1
    My company is addressing this problem by monitoring the vulnerable points in the file system and registry, logging attempts to change them, and optionally undoing the changes. It seems to me that this is the best way to address the issue because it confronts the more general problem without requiring a database of known spyware that needs constant updating.

    This solution is really intended for competent IT managers, since you have to coordinate it with actual updates (like service pack installs), but it's pretty easy to use. I have been using it to manage my wife's system and several neighbors. Before I started, the systems were the usual spyware-fest. Now it's just amusing to get a notification every time someone tries to install something they shouldn't.

    Allan Miller

    handsfreenetworks.com