Slashdot Mirror


Armed Dolphins Released Into Gulf of Mexico

An anonymous reader writes "The Guardian is reporting on what may be the weirdest Hurricane Katrina story yet. Military trained dolphins may have been released into the wild by the Hurricane's devastation." From the article: "Experts who have studied the U.S. navy's cetacean training exercises claim the 36 mammals could be carrying 'toxic dart' guns. Divers and surfers risk attack, they claim, from a species considered to be among the planet's smartest. The U.S. navy admits it has been training dolphins for military purposes, but has refused to confirm that any are missing. Dolphins have been trained in attack-and-kill missions since the Cold War. The U.S. Atlantic bottlenose dolphins have apparently been taught to shoot terrorists attacking military vessels. Their coastal compound was breached during the storm, sweeping them out to sea. But those who have studied the controversial use of dolphins in the U.S. defence programme claim it is vital they are caught quickly."

534 comments

  1. Sound a little fishy to me. by seanadams.com · · Score: 5, Funny

    What could be the porpoise of arming these creatures?

    Before we starting carping on the ineptitude of our navy, I think we should more carefully exsalmon the situation - they may not be solely at fault. Perhaps Katrina is just a red herring here, and these killer dolphins have been floundering around for months. Maybe some deranged fool let them loose just for the halibut. Whoever is responsible should have their head on a pike.

    1. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by klagermkii · · Score: 4, Funny

      At least they're not armed with frickin' lasers!

    2. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by ubercombatwombat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I seriously doubt they are armed. Weapons are usually put away unloaded.

    3. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by richdun · · Score: 1

      Hmm, you have many points, but I must disagree. It smells fishy to me, and mostly because while I have smelled fish, I have yet to hear one.

      And as a pre-emptive response, dolphins are mammals, not fish, so I stand by the above statement.

    4. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by arfff · · Score: 1

      Verrrrrry punny.

    5. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by AviN456 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd like to point out that the parent should be modded up FUNNY, not INTERESTING

      --
      - Just because we CAN do a thing, does not mean we SHOULD do that thing.
    6. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Comments like this just make me eel. I'm net that kind of buoy, sea? Fin the end, it seems we're scaling new depths, and it gills me to have to say it. Ok, I think this tail of roe is done.

    7. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by seanadams.com · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'd like to point out that the parent should be modded up FUNNY, not INTERESTING

      I think it's pointless to fine tuna moderation like that.

    8. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by Comatose51 · · Score: 1

      That was the MOST brilliant/witty thing I've ever seen posted on Slashdot. Bravo!

      --
      EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
    9. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by eosp · · Score: 1
      Maybe some deranged fool let them loose just for the halibut.

      You meant hooligan, not fool, right?

    10. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by dr_dank · · Score: 4, Funny

      This must be a prank that the reporter swallowed hook, line, and sinker.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    11. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by Meagermanx · · Score: 4, Funny

      You guys are just fishing for karma. why don't you sea if you can find something more useful to do with your time.

    12. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by AndrewStephens · · Score: 5, Funny

      I agree, this whole story is a load of carp.

      --
      sheep.horse - does not contain information on sheep or horses.
    13. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meagermanx, meet sense of humor. Maybe one day you'll get along.

    14. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by slashdotnickname · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      their one achille's heel...

      dolphin-safe tuna!

    15. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by ZakuSage · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I told you before: all I want is frickin' sharks with frickin' lasers on their heads. Is that so much to ask for?

    16. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please tell me you are joking.

    17. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I couldn't fathom that Joke, it was too deep..

      Maybe it's because I'm under a lot of pressure.

    18. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't that the point?

      wow.

    19. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You insensitive cod!

    20. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by nwbvt · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Dolphins have been used to help hunt mines. Their sonar abilities end up being better than our electronic hardware. Though if that is what these are, I'm not sure how much of a threat they will then be to human divers.

      If you want a real account of military-trained animals getting out and causing havoc, check this out. One of my old biology profs knew a guy who worked on this.

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    21. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by griffjon · · Score: 4, Funny

      Whoever is responsible should have their head on a pike

      It's not like some idiot just let them trout, for shellfish purposes or otherwise -- tuna in to your tv, there was a hurricane. It's not like they cod have seen this as a possiblity with all the crabby, hammer-headed officials higher up in the food chain. Ask any general, and eel tell you that this was some shrimpy, reefer smoking, floundering good-for-nothing in charge, and didn't plan ahead.

      --
      Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
    22. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by biggreddy · · Score: 1

      I can see it now...these dolphins swimming around in their natural home trying to get these damn "DART GUNS" off of themselves, Oh wait I bet they've already figured out how to get them off, considering how smart these animals are. Very funny story and an interesting topic of discussion for and against animal-human "cooperation"...all in the name of terror huh? It's ridiculous - LOL http://www.myspace.com/biggreddy

    23. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Before we starting carping on the ineptitude of our navy, I think we should more carefully exsalmon the situation - they may not be solely at fault. Perhaps Katrina is just a red herring here, and these killer dolphins have been floundering around for months. Maybe some deranged fool let them loose just for the halibut. Whoever is responsible should have their head on a pike.

      For once this seems almost appropriate:

      Wet Dreams by Kip Addotta

      It was April the forty-first / Being a quadruple leap year / I was driving in downtown Atlantis / My barracuda was in the shop / So I was in a rented stingray / And it was overheating

      So I pulled into a Shell Station / They said I'd blown a seal / I said, "Fix the damn thing / And leave my private life out of it / Okay pal?"

      While they were doing that / I walked over to a place called the Oyster Bar, a real dive / But I knew the owner / He used to play for the Dolphins / I said "Hi Gil" / You have to yell, he's hard of herring

      Think I had a wet dream / Cruisin' thru the Gulf Stream / Ooh Ooh Ooh Ooh / Wet dream

      Gil was also down on his luck / Fact is he was barely keeping his head below water / I bellied up to the sandbar / He poured me the usual

      Rusty snail, hold the grunion / Shaken not stirred / With a peanut butter and jellyfish sandwich on the side / Heavy on the mako

      I slipped him a fin / On porpoise / I was feeling good / I even dropped a sand dollar in the box for / Jerry's squids / For the halibut

      Well the place was crowded / We were packed in like sardines They were all there to listen to the big band sounds of Tommy Dorsal / What sole

      Tommy was rockin' the place with a very popular tuna / Salmon Chanted Evening / And the stage was surrounded by screaming groupers / Probably there to see the bass player

      One of them was this cute little yellowtail / And she's giving me the eye / So I figured this is my chance for a little fun / You know, piece of Pisces

      But she said things I just couldn't fathom / She was too deep, seemed to be under a lot of pressure / Boy, could she drink / She drank like a . . . / She drank a lot

      I said "What's your sign" / She said "Aquarium" / I said "Great, let's get tanked" / Think I had a wet dream / Cruisin' thru the Gulf Stream / Ooh Ooh Ooh Ooh / Wet dream

      I invited her to my place for a midnight bait / I said "Come on baby, it'll only take a few minnows" / She threw me that same old line / "Not tonight, I gotta haddock"

      And she wasn't kidding either / Cause in came the biggest, meanest looking haddock / I'd ever seen come down the pike / He was covered with mussels

      He came over to me and said / "Listen, shrimp, don't you come trollin' around here" / What a crab
      This guy was steamed / I could see the anchor in his eyes

      I turned to him, I said / "A-balone, you're just being shellfish" / Well, I knew it was going to be trouble and so did Gil / Cause he was already on the phone to the cods

      The haddock hits me with a sucker punch / I catch him with a left hook / He eels over / It was a fluke but there he was / Lying on the deck, flat as a mackerel / Kelpless

      I said "Forget the cods Gil / This guy's gonna need a sturgeon" / Well, the yellowtail was impressed with the way I landed her boyfriend / She came over to me, she said / "Hey, big boy, you're really a game fish
      What's your name" / I said "Marlin"

      Think I had a wet dream / Cruisin' thru the Gulf Stream / Ooh Ooh Ooh Ooh / Wet dream

      Well, from then on we had a whale of a time / I took her to dinner, I took her to dance
      I bought her a bouquet of flounders / And then I went home with her / And what did I get for my trouble / A case of the clams

      Think I had a wet dream / Cruisin' thru the Gulf Stream / Ooh Ooh Ooh Ooh

    24. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I thought for a second that this post said ' Dolphins have been used to help hunt mimes'. I'd kinda like to see that...

    25. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by Black+Art · · Score: 1

      It makes you question your believe in Cod.

      I think I am getting eel...

      --
      "Trademarks are the heraldry of the new feudalism."
    26. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by antic · · Score: 5, Funny


      "Our intelligent designer has never created an animal that we couldn't improve by strapping a bomb to it."

      That's gold!

      --
      'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
    27. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by Cheval · · Score: 0

      They're bad, they're mean, and they don't take crap from any tuna fisherman. Blasting their way out of the nets..it's....The D-Team. (hint: the one with the gold chains around his blowhole is one mean mofo).

    28. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by moro_666 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      actually, 6 years a shark scenario of this stuff came out already from hollywood

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0149261/

      and i'm not really sure if sharks are more dangerous than dolphins that are powered with poison darts ... cause the latter is quite intelligent ...

      --

      I'd tell you the chances of this story being a dupe, but you wouldn't like it.
    29. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, if it on Fox News then it must be true!

    30. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by the+MaD+HuNGaRIaN · · Score: 5, Funny
      At least they are phishing for karma.....

      How would that go?
      From: cowboyneal@slashdot.org
      To: meagermanx
      Subject: Slashdot Upgrades
       
      Dear Slashdot User,
      We recently having upgraded our system for to enabling the use of the CSS.
      To ensuring your account getting the proper Karma rating, we asking for you to updating your account.
      Simply clicking this link <a href="www.karmawhores.com/phishing_for_karma">here </a> to have your karma properly credited to the right account.
       
      Sincerely,
      Cowboy Neal
    31. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quality Guardian reporting at it's best.

    32. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by binkzz · · Score: 1

      Don't be so shellfish, there's more than enough karma for everyone.

      --
      'For we walk by faith, not by sight.' II Corinthians 5:7
    33. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 1
      Well, tell it to our man Flint!

      A trio of feminists are helping a group of Army conspirators to overthrow the government, not realizing that their male comrades are going to betray them when they've succeeded. From an island spa called Fabulous Face, they dispatch a lookalike to replace the President (Andrew Duggan) and quickly discredit security chief Lloyd Cramden (Lee J. Cobb) with compromising photographs. Derek Flint (James Coburn) is busy talking to dolphins and performing ballet in Russia with duplicitous ballerina Natasha (Yvonne Craig), but he eventually goes to Fabulous Face to straighten things out. Cramden's already a prisoner there, having foolishly tried to crash the place while disguised as a woman.
      --
      "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
    34. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...Please shut up

    35. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by Associate · · Score: 1

      Are you insinuating sharks are stupid?
      Or only sharks that would carry lasers in the first place?
      And what of the ill tempered seabass?

      --
      Someone hates these cans.
    36. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      All your bass are belong to us!

    37. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by gamer4Life · · Score: 0

      You mean "lasers" don't you?

    38. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by TrekCycling · · Score: 3, Funny
    39. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by Bilestoad · · Score: 1

      Sean Adams, for this post and for all the SliMP3/Squeezebox players I have owned and currently own, you rock.

    40. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With the editors here, how would you know it's not legit?

      Sounds too plausable, to make the joke work you'll need to improve the grammar.

    41. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by acebone · · Score: 0

      "... crabby, hammer-headed officials..."

      Do you mean offishials ?

      --
      Check out my PHP Url Validator
    42. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by tigersha · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even the United States government would not be dumb enough to try to deploy a laser weapon in a medium that absorbs about 50% of the energy every meter it travels. Did you read too much Flash Gordon when you were a kid or what?

      --
      The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
    43. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by alyflex · · Score: 1

      hmm somehow i just cant see myself getting scared when the new horror movie comes out and the main character yells "Ohhhh Noo we are doomed, here comes the invading dolphins" i mean come on...

    44. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by master_p · · Score: 1

      i expected the lazer comment to the first though...

    45. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps not but they are pathetic

    46. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, with that much power those dolphins could start burning CDs down there. And we know how much the armed might of Hollywood dislikes that.

    47. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by wed128 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I think we shouldn't be moderating anyone funny until they fix the very broken moderation system...

    48. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "fishing" for karma, and "sea" instead of see. I suppose you missed those :-P

    49. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by Zenmonkeycat · · Score: 1

      What about B.F. Skinner's pigeonbombs? Had the war gone on just a year longer, we'd have had pigeons guiding homing bombs right into Japanese destroyers or Hitler's bunker in Berlin.

      --

      *****
      Dear Mary,
      I yearn for you tragically,
      A.T. Tappman, Chaplain, U.S. Army.

    50. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by Ryan+Monster · · Score: 1

      I think I'm going to be eel!

      --
      Change your name to Homer Junior! Your friends can call you Hoju
    51. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by ModMeFlamebait · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Whoooosh!

      --
      Pavlov. Does this name ring a bell?
    52. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by griffjon · · Score: 1

      no, I definitely meant offishells, just spelled it wrong. I guess I need to go to school

      --
      Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
    53. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by ramblin+billy · · Score: 1


      Yes they would. Blue/green lasers are used for underwater communications and detection.

      billy - I never underestimate the stupidity of our government

    54. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by k2r · · Score: 1

      > It's not like they cod have seen this

      Well, there seems to be a lot of stuff that "could not have been seen" in the US nowadays.

      k2r

    55. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Even the United States government would not be dumb enough to try to deploy a laser weapon in a medium that absorbs about 50% of the energy every meter it travels.

      I guess you never watched Seaquest when it was on ;)

      Come here Darwin... good boy.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    56. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by DevNova · · Score: 1

      There's no reason to believe they have been trained to shoot the lasers underwater. Anyone who has ever visited SeaWorld can attest that dolphins can come up out the water. Underwater travel makes them much more difficult to detect. Once they have reached their target, they can either lift their heads out of the water (assuming the lasers are indeed head-mounted) or jump fully out of the water to fire their weaponry.

    57. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by scottennis · · Score: 1

      I had everything under control until I came to this one. Now everyone on my conference call is wondering why I have gone to mute. And everyone in my office is wondering why I'm LMAO!

    58. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      Dammit, I just spent twenty minutes trying to find the fishy pun in your post... we need a mod for "on topic, but in an off-topic thred, so sort of off-topic"

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    59. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by Zawash · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Bah! Every Car Wars fan knows that you can buy the 'blue-green wavelength' as an option to any laser for underwater use.. Hmm - wasn't that 25% of the original cost?

      Underwater lasers work just fine - just remember to water-proof any underwater weapons!

      Hmm - but can one make laser-guided torpedoes with a blue-green laser? That's what I want to know!

      --
      File not found. Fake it(Y/N)? _
    60. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      What if the enemy starts training dolphins, too?

      I mean, our boys have enough psychological problems having to shoot approaching children. Imagine if they had to shoot dolphins, too?

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    61. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Even the United States government would not be dumb enough to try to deploy a laser weapon in a medium that absorbs about 50% of the energy every meter it travels.

      You mean the same brilliant government that wasted millions of dollars using "psychics" for its intelligence operations?

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    62. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      In Soviet Russia, YOU laser dolphin.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    63. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This story must be true, because the Weekly World News reported it originally.

    64. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by Retric · · Score: 2, Informative

      Did you read the link?

      On the other hand, water (seawater, that is) transmits blue-green light pretty well -- losing "only" about 5% of its original intensity for every meter it transmits through water.

      It drops to 1/2 power every 14m. So at 100m your down to .95 ^ 100 = 0.5% which is going to be ever so usefull...

    65. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by filipl · · Score: 1

      ... and hold the world hostage, unless they pay ... one *million* dollars!

    66. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by charon_1 · · Score: 0

      He isn't being serious. This is a direct reference to the Austin Powers movie where Dr. Evil has sharks with "frickin lasers" attatched their heads trained to kill people.

    67. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by Stephan+Schulz · · Score: 2, Funny
      "Even the United States government would not be dumb enough to ..."
      Meep. You lose. Please play again!
      --

      Stephan

    68. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by Castar · · Score: 1

      Man, I loved that movie. It was one of the best awful movies produced in recent history. Usually for that brand of so-terrible-it's-funny sci-fi, you have to go back to the 50s and 60s.

      But Deep Blue Sea did it for me. Especially the part with Samuel Jackson. I have to watch that again.

      --
      I yearn for you tragically. A. T. Tappman, Chaplain, U.S. Army.
    69. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by supergwiz · · Score: 1

      In the U.S. navy's Aquarium, the dolphins shoot you!

    70. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by u2pa · · Score: 1

      > Even the United States government would not be dumb enough to try to deploy a laser weapon in a medium that absorbs about 50% of the energy every meter it travels.

      Maybe not, but now the US Navy needs new counter-dolphin weapons.

      --
      Officially: "No comments"
    71. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by u2pa · · Score: 1

      Fisherman: "Cap'n we got alot of dolphins in the net"
      Captain: "Im telling you, its TUNA"
      Fisherman: "Cap'n, these 'tuna' are armed"

      --
      Officially: "No comments"
    72. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by Injury99 · · Score: 1

      Actually I'm betting it's the news story I saw last week after going through the rumor mill and several blogmodifications. They had around 6 dolphins that got out of an aqaurium during the hurricane to the gulf on TV last week. They were shown on the news after being missing and were reported as showing up near shore basically waiting to be let back in. They showed several trainers in their colorful cut off wetsuits in boats and on some kind of oversized kickboards feeding and playing with them while awaiting transport. The red/black and yellow/black short wetsuits didn't look to me like military issue. Maybe the seals are going more California surfer while on duty these days /shrug.

    73. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by Nopal · · Score: 1

      I think that's enough. Muskie keep making bad puns?

    74. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by kchilders · · Score: 1

      The Guardian's story has so man holes in it you can read The Times right through it.

      BTW the US Navy's Marine Mammal Program (Part of the Navy's, Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command (SPAWAR))is based out of SSC San Deigo, California.

      --
      Kevin M. Childers
      Computer repair and networking tech.
      Available over most messaging services as KC1111111111
    75. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by ACPosterChild · · Score: 1

      Ahh, you've hit upon it! There are no swimmers or surfers who need to be worried; the dolphins are out turning the tables and getting revenge on the sharks for eons of predation!

    76. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by Vampyre_Macavity · · Score: 1

      And I'll look up into his cold, dead eyes, and wave to him, just like this!

      *waggles fingers a la Vir Cotto*

    77. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by ak47pundit · · Score: 1

      Frankly my dear scallop, I don't give a clam who is responsible. Its a crappie situation and the story just smelts fishy to me.

    78. Re:Sound a little fishy to me. by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      Inelegant designer

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  2. Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    We just send out the robot sharks to killed the armed dolphins. Then we send out the exploding whales to take out the robot sharks.

    1. Re:Easy solution by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

      We just send out the robot sharks to kill the armed dolphins. Then we send out the exploding whales to take out the robot sharks.

      Rumsfield, is that you?

    2. Re:Easy solution by aztec+rain+god · · Score: 0

      How do you know the dolphins don't have shark repellant?

      --
      Sig cannot be found.
    3. Re:Easy solution by brian.glanz · · Score: 5, Interesting
      "It sounds incredible, but this program is quite well-known in military circles," says Leo Sheridan, an internationally respected accident investigator, to London's The Observer in a relevant article from March, 1998.

      In February 1998, dozens of dead dolphins began washing ashore along the French Mediterranean. According to Jon Henley, a reporter for The Observer, "Most bore an identical, and mysterious wound - a neat, fist-sized hole - on the underside of their necks."

      Marine biologists were baffled but Leo Sheridan proposed the only explanation that has not yet been dismissed. "I am convinced that these were dolphins trained by the US Navy and that something went badly wrong," Sheridan told The Observer.

      Sheridan believes "they were disposed of to conceal the existence of the Americans' military dolphin program." In fact it was 1989 when the U.S. Navy began its classified Cetacean Intelligence Mission. The San Diego-based operation involved fitting dolphins with neck harnesses that pressed small electrodes into their skin.

      The animals were taught to recognize and drown enemy divers. The dolphins could be remotely monitored and controlled via electric signals transmitted through the neck harness. In order to prevent the dolphins and the Navy's technology from falling into the wrong hands, a small explosive charge was planted in the harness on the underside of the animal's neck.

      Sheridan noted that 16 of the dead dolphins displayed the same kind of round puncture wound that is "consistent with a small detonation. "It seems to me no accident that these dolphins first began washing up in the middle of a military crisis when American warships and submarines were en route to the [Persian] Gulf."

      ... it's safe to assume technology and maybe even the Navy are a bit smarter, seven years on. If I were going to remotely eliminate the swimming evidence, assuming I could regain control of it, I would have each dolphin swim to a different location.

      I'd also not kill each with the same mechanism. Some could enjoy the release of a toxin they might have naturally eaten too much of, others an electric shock they might naturally have happened upon. In any event I'd be more inventive than blasting equivalent holes in 16 necks, then tossing on a few dozen other dolphins to cover the ass of a classified program.

      BG

    4. Re:Easy solution by pharwell · · Score: 1

      But you could just send out the exploding whales first and save a step. Wouldn't want to waste a set of robot sharks.

      --
      I quote others only in order the better to express myself. -- Michel de Montaigne
    5. Re:Easy solution by SnowZero · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My god, what a kook this Sheridan guy is...

      Marine biologists were baffled but Leo Sheridan proposed the only explanation that has not yet been dismissed. "I am convinced that these were dolphins trained by the US Navy and that something went badly wrong,

      I am convinced it was done by aliens hiding on the Canary islands... can't dismiss that either. See, it's easy to say something is the result of some secret project: Since all the evidence you would need to prove your case is secret, of course you can't provide any evidence.

      In fact it was 1989 when the U.S. Navy began its classified Cetacean Intelligence Mission.

      Well, if you trot over to the program's official web page, you can see they have been training toothed whales since 1962. And once again, how does he know the specifics of something supposedly top secret (but with an official web page, of course)? Maybe it began in 1987, and it's even more advanced!

      Speculation is fun, but when you do it too much and for too long you simply start seeing patterns that aren't really there. You start believing anything that fits your pattern, even when far simpler explanations fit equally well. Occam's Razor goes out the window. I wonder what Sheridan thinks of the movie A Beautiful Mind.

    6. Re:Easy solution by brian.glanz · · Score: 1
      SZ, dig deeper. Leo Sheridan is not at all a kook.

      Sheridan is a well respected British expert particularly on wrecked ships, who occasionally chimes in to solve odd seaborne mysteries like the myriad washed up, dead dolphins in '98, a curious lot of whom sported blast holes in their necks. Google him and you'll grant Sheridan more respect.

      The U.S. conducted lot of related research since WWII both in and out of dedicated programs and offices, as did the Soviets. (Other countries' efforts were limited.) Nothing on the Navy page you point to dilutes Sheridan's account of a classified program. That is to say, the existence of open source and/or declassified programs and material says nothing about whether a classified program exists.

      Your overstatements are a little strange, as when you wrote "supposedly top secret" to berate Sheridan's commentary about the U.S. program, when he had only referred to the program as "classified." SZ, have you ever heard of a straw man?

      It seems like you assumed you had a slam-dunk analysis of this thread. Without looking deeply enough you proceeded to repeat and laud yourself (and repeat lauding yourself).

      Take another look around, and consider all the history of this research. That the U.S. Navy has this classified program and in 1998 fumbled some remote training and networking technologies -- this is too hard for you to believe? Or, do you find it unlikely that the U.S. Navy would blast some dolphins to cover its ass?

      It seems plausible that if any of the dolphins missing here in 2005 were armed or otherwise comprised of valuable intel bits, they may turn up dead in the local news down South or in Mexico. By being aware of what may have occurred in 1998, we'll sooner see whether this particular story gets any more interesting.

    7. Re:Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naw, that'd be overkrill.

    8. Re:Easy solution by zippthorne · · Score: 1, Informative

      dolphins ARE whales. if you skip the sharks, there would already be 'armed whales' in the water.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    9. Re:Easy solution by SnowZero · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sheridan is a well respected British expert particularly on wrecked ships, who occasionally chimes in to solve odd seaborne mysteries like the myriad washed up, dead dolphins in '98, a curious lot of whom sported blast holes in their necks. Google him and you'll grant Sheridan more respect.

      The first two google hits are for other people, but the third one is this. It appears to be a story about Leo leading a team of divers that claimed in the press that they found the long-lost plane wreck of Amy Johnson. However when questioned directly by officials in London, they said they hadn't actually found anything. That was in 2003 and nothing additional seems to have happened. So, while I was honestly trying to find out more about Leo, the first hit seeems to indicate he likes to make bold exagerations when speaking to the press. This isn't helping my confidence...

      Nothing on the Navy page you point to dilutes Sheridan's account of a classified program. That is to say, the existence of open source and/or declassified programs and material says nothing about whether a classified program exists.

      Actually it has lots of interesting tidbits, such as this: "Why have there been so many rumors about the NMMP over the years? Several decades of classification of the program's true missions of mine-hunting and swimmer defense, led to media speculation and animal activist charges of dolphins used as offensive weapons, speculation and charges that could not be countered with facts due to that classification. Additionally, fantasy is often times more interesting than reality. With declassification of the missions of the program in the early 1990s, the Navy has repeatedly and openly discussed those missions, but rumors are not easily forgotten, and there are those who continue to actively promote them."

      So it was classified, but it isn't anymore. Now, they could easily be lying, but I don't know why I should trust Leo any more than the Navy. In fact I don't trust either in the absence of any proof, which argues for the Null Hypothesis.

      SZ, have you ever heard of a straw man?

      Have you ever heard of failure of proof of the negative is not proof of the positive? Why *must* it be true that dead dolphins killed by explosions were part of a secret Navy program gone awry? If the dead dolphins had "US NAVY" stamped on them, that would be one thing, but instead we simply had evidence that they were killed in the same unusual way. That raises the following questions:

      - Why would the Navy test something in the Mediterranean unless they were sure it would work?
      - If the dolphins could not be allowed to fall into the wrong hands, why didn't they keep them in holding tanks during transit? (like the ones they used for the Katrina dolphin rescue)
      - Why use dolphins to guard a fleet in transit, when there is no risk from divers? Navy ships can travel at 30 knots, so you don't have to worry about anyone swimming up to your vessel.
      - Why not design the device to fall off of the dolphin into the sea rather than explode and kill the dolphin? It's not like the dolphins are going to swim up and sell their secrets to a foreign goverment.
      - Why couldn't these belong to a foreign government's navy? After years of information about the US program, and the relatively low budget required, why wouldn't navies test this idea?
      - Why use dolphins at all for offensive operations, when the Navy's published research indicates that sea lions are far better for this purpose? (Dolphins are only used for mine hunting now, security and "force protection" against divers is provided by sea lions)

      Here's an alternative: Dolphins get trapped in fishing nets all the time in that sea (see here). Maybe some fishermen were bored and hated dolphins enough to kill all the ones landing in their nets with explosives. Or maybe they were part of a secret ritu

    10. Re:Easy solution by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 1

      I can't tell what he thinks of that movie, but i liked it quite much personally, ty.

      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
    11. Re:Easy solution by adagioforstrings · · Score: 1

      Then we send out the exploding whales to take out the robot sharks.

      And we all know what happens then, right?

    12. Re:Easy solution by ramblin+billy · · Score: 1


      BRAVO!

      Holes in the neck? Sounds like it could have been bangsticks. Or vampire moray eels.

      billy - they're territorial, you know

    13. Re:Easy solution by smithmc · · Score: 2, Funny

        We just send out the robot sharks to kill the armed dolphins. Then we send out the exploding whales to take out the robot sharks.

      Rumsfield, is that you?

      Look, when you're ordered to send your trained-aquatic-creature navy to war, you go to war with the trained-aquatic-creature navy that you have.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    14. Re:Easy solution by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      "Have you ever heard of failure of proof of the negative is not proof of the positive?"

      But, you see, that is how most slashdotters justify their arguments. If you take that away, how can we have flamewars about semi-political topics?

      Also, I'd like to point out the the Guardian is kinda like the British version of the Weekly World News. Other than the dolphins-with-frickin-poison-darts to sharks-with-frickin-laser-beams comparison, there is really no reson for this article to be /. at all.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    15. Re:Easy solution by Ours · · Score: 1

      Ah yeah, reminds me of a crazy but cool anime. Genetically modified whales agains nuclear subs. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Submarine_No._6

      --
      "You superiour intellect is no match for our puny weapons" - The Simpsons
    16. Re:Easy solution by pharwell · · Score: 1

      Fight fire with fire, and dolphins with dolphins.

      --
      I quote others only in order the better to express myself. -- Michel de Montaigne
  3. welcom by drewfuss · · Score: 1, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new dolphin overlords.

    1. Re:welcom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, for one, welcome our new dolphin overlords.

      Whoever modded the parent "funny" instead of "insanely old and tedious" should be immediately killed.

    2. Re:welcom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Phew, I was perch on the edge of my seat gulper compulsively until I saw this thread.

  4. Obligatory... by rasafras · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Do they have laser beams?

    1. Re:Obligatory... by Spock+the+Vulcan · · Score: 0, Redundant

      As long as they are not "fricking" laser beams...

    2. Re:Obligatory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dartgun-nosed overlords, apparently.

      I can't wait for the new dolphin super-species to evolve.

  5. Dart guns??!! by TheGuano · · Score: 3, Funny

    All I asked for are some frickin' sharks with frickin' laser beams on their heads!!

    1. Re:Dart guns??!! by evanism · · Score: 0

      you stole my material!

      --
      Just bought a new quantum computer, but I'm uncertain how it works.
    2. Re:Dart guns??!! by TheGuano · · Score: 1

      And yet, sadly for both of us, it seems to be the schtick of fully half the posts on this thread.

    3. Re:Dart guns??!! by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      They *are* ill-tempered...

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    4. Re:Dart guns??!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meanwhile, the Canadian military is denying rumors of a missing herd of fairly unpleasantly-dispositioned moose with Taser-equipped antlers...

    5. Re:Dart guns??!! by mikiN · · Score: 1

      ... fully half the posts on this thread.

      Well, I'd say at least most of a quarter of the posts.

      --
      The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
    6. Re:Dart guns??!! by TheGuano · · Score: 1

      The stat got stale as more people posted.

  6. One miiiiiillion dollars by RaffiRai · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Can I be the first person to make that joke? I doubt it, but let's try :)

  7. Thanks for all the fish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Thanks for all the fish!

  8. I for one... by Approaching.sanity · · Score: 0, Redundant

    welcome the gulfs new dart gun shooting flipper waving overlords.

    What? Someone was going to say it.

    --
    RTFA again for the best results.
    1. Re:I for one... by dangil · · Score: 1

      I for one welcome our bored readers

  9. Frickin'.... by Audent · · Score: 1, Redundant

    blah blah laser
    blah blah welcome new overlords
    blah blah cluster of these
    blah blah blah blah

    Frickaseein' wabbits

    --
    I am a leaf on the wind
    1. Re:Frickin'.... by kflash15 · · Score: 5, Funny

      you forgot... blah blah blah do they run linux?

    2. Re:Frickin'.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Been coding in c++ lately? Seem to me you might have a templatitis

    3. Re:Frickin'.... by eosp · · Score: 1

      And... blah blah blah can we make a beowulf cluster out of 'em?

    4. Re:Frickin'.... by DeathElk · · Score: 1

      And... All your seaworlds are belong to us **flipper clap flipper clap**

    5. Re:Frickin'.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the gulf of soviet mexico, military trained Hurricane released into the wild by dolphins.??

    6. Re:Frickin'.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good God--
      Can you imagine a beowulf cluster of these in Soviet Russia?

    7. Re:Frickin'.... by VolciMaster · · Score: 1
      and you forgot...

      ..step 3: profit!

    8. Re:Frickin'.... by robinsc · · Score: 1

      They are Dolphins not Penguins

      --
      Linkedin http://in.linkedin.com/in/robinsaikatchatterjee
  10. Toxic darts? by Snad · · Score: 0, Redundant

    What, no frickin' "lasers"?

  11. So long... by ScriptMonkey · · Score: 0, Redundant

    So long, and thanks for all the fish!

  12. Dr... Dr. Evil by robvangelder · · Score: 0, Redundant

    More fricken laser beam equipped sharks jokes.

  13. COD...er...MOD PARENT UP by soulctcher · · Score: 1

    Best first post ever.

  14. Whats next? by scmcclain · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Sharks with frickin' lasers on their heads?

  15. So long.. by brohan · · Score: 5, Funny

    So long and thanks for all the toxic darts..

    1. Re:So long.. by dcapel · · Score: 5, Funny

      Intergalactic News Headline:

      The Pan-dimensional creatures have officially returned to the cosmic spotlight after a reclusion in the backwater planet of Earth, taking the second most intelligent race with them.

      When asked to comment about their unusual extraction method, they issued this statement:

      "We have completed our mission, and so have left Earth. Having found the secret to life, we can now return to the mainstream galaxy, and establish our control over the interdimensional biosphere.

      In our effort to leave, we caused a weather distortion, and as such have taken the dolphin race with us to act as our agents in galactic control."

      When asked to elaborate upon the dolphins, they replied:

      "The dolphins were conducting a case study of the primitive humans and how they used the tools at hand to advance their agenda. They allowed themselves to be retrofitted with primitive weapons by the humans, let themselves be 'trained'. They were on the verge of prooving their thesis that primitive government is overrated, and is doomed by corruption though the lack of intelligence in the upper classes of society when we were forced to extract them. While their thesis remains unprooved, they gained valuable experiance in terrorizing with head-mounted implements. We plan to upgrade them from dart guns to lasers in the near future."

      When the galactic president, Zaphod Beeblebrox, was asked to comment, he refused to say anything but "I for one welcome our head-mounted laser-wielding attack dolphin overlords."

      --
      DYWYPI?
  16. The dolphins have FLIPPERED out. by The_Spectry · · Score: 5, Funny

    Holy crap flipper just killed my entire family.

    On a serious note I say the answer is to just buy a bunch of six packs of beer, drink em and then toss the can rings into the ocean. TV has told me this will kill all manner of marine life. TV is seldom innacurate.

    1. Re:The dolphins have FLIPPERED out. by eosp · · Score: 1

      We all need an excuse.

    2. Re:The dolphins have FLIPPERED out. by IWorkForMorons · · Score: 0, Troll

      Flipper??? I knew him as James, the Nigger-Hating Dolphin...

    3. Re:The dolphins have FLIPPERED out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mods: It's from Chapelle's Show, dumbass. Grow a sense of humour...

    4. Re:The dolphins have FLIPPERED out. by Shishberg · · Score: 1
      TV is seldom innacurate.

      Like Slashdot spelling.

      Nobody expects the pedantic inquisition!

    5. Re:The dolphins have FLIPPERED out. by insert_username_here · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hi, this site is all about dolphins, REAL DOLPHINS. This site is awesome. My name is Robert and I can't stop thinking about dolphins. These guys are cool; and by cool, I mean totally sweet.

      Facts:
      1. Dolphins are mammals.
      2. Dolphins fight ALL the time.
      3. The purpose of the dolphin is to flip out and kill people.

      Dolphins can kill anyone they want! Dolphins cut off heads ALL the time and don't even think twice about it. These guys are so crazy and awesome that they flip out ALL the time. I heard that there was this dolphin who was eating at a diner. And when some dude dropped a spoon the dolphin killed the whole town. My friend Mark said that he saw a dolphin totally uppercut some kid just because the kid opened a window.

      And that's what I call REAL Ultimate Power!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      --
      -- Dramatisation - May Not Have Happened
    6. Re:The dolphins have FLIPPERED out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ooooh, Ninja dolphins?

  17. Dolphins with Toxic darts? by KarmaBlackballed · · Score: 2, Funny

    What about the sharks with lasers on their heads? Were they at different facilities?

    --

    --- -- - -
    Give me LIBERTY, or give me a check.
  18. Tracking...? by JediLow · · Score: 2, Funny

    Doesn't the Navy have some sort of tracking system for their dolphins...? I'd assume so at least.

    1. Re:Tracking...? by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      Though you were modded funny, I think that you were serious.

      Lets put this in perspective.

      1) Dolphins that swim by ships radiate radar pings... so US can find them.
      2) Enemy picks up radar pings, finding US ships.
      3) ???
      4) Death of American sailors.

      No, I don't think that they'll be doing that any time soon. Though I've heard that bright orange camouflage with reflectors placed on the helmet are going to be the next infantry uniform.

    2. Re:Tracking...? by child_of_mercy · · Score: 1

      A few months ago on the same day I read about different approaches to next generation camoflage by the Australian and US Armies.

      The Australian DSTO (Defence Science and Technology Organisation) was very excited they'd found a way to extend their camoflage patterns into the infra-red.

      The US had found a way to make their uniforms more visible under infra red. One assumes friendly fire at night was a greater fear than enemy combatants with night vision.

      --
      'There is a Light that never goes out.'
    3. Re:Tracking...? by styrotech · · Score: 1

      Makes sense on both counts - the US soldiers wouldn't recognise the Aussies uniforms anyway. The Aussies would be safer if the Americans couldn't see them either.

  19. Oooh, I got one... by Audent · · Score: 5, Funny

    In 1972/2005 a crack commando unit was sent to prison by a military court/accidentally released into the wild for a crime they didn't commit/by a hurricane.

    These men/dolphins promptly escaped from a maximum security stockade/maximum security pool to the Los Angeles/Texas underground.

    Today, still wanted by the government, they survive as soldiers of fortune. If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you can find them, maybe you can hire the A-Team.
    Warning - will work for mackerel.

    --
    I am a leaf on the wind
    1. Re:Oooh, I got one... by rbmorse · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now I've got that stupid "A-Team" theme song stuck in my head. Thanks.

    2. Re:Oooh, I got one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny


      Today, still wanted by the government, they survive as soldiers of fortune. If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you can find them, maybe you can hire the A-Team.
      Warning - will work for mackerel.


      you mean they work for scale, right?

    3. Re:Oooh, I got one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oooh, that's so bad it's hurt!

      do it again.

    4. Re:Oooh, I got one... by BJH · · Score: 1

      In Germany, that's called an "earworm", apparently.

    5. Re:Oooh, I got one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      Warning - will work for mackerel.

      Squid pro quo, Clarice. Squid pro quo.

    6. Re:Oooh, I got one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have a problem, if no one else can help, maybe you can hire, the freakbots!

      where freakbots roam freaky!

      D Cups, Full of Justice!

    7. Re:Oooh, I got one... by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      I pity you, fool.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    8. Re:Oooh, I got one... by hobbesx · · Score: 1

      The A-Team theme song is sufficiently eradicated by the Chip & Dale: Rescue Rangers theme song.

      --
      This rating is Unfair ( ) ( ) Fair (*) Funny
      Sigh... If only. Modding would be so much more fun.
  20. no fishing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hmm... guess im not going fishing for a week or so

  21. Flipper with Lasers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flipper with Lasers = Flipaser

    Sounds like a great UPN show!

  22. WEIRD. by priestx · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Do they have lasers on top of their heads too? Throw me a friggin' bone here.

    --
    "To be is to do." -Socrates
    "To do is to be." -Jean-Paul Sartre
    "Do-be-do-be-do." -Frank Sinatra
  23. OH MY GOD, FLIPPER!! by rob_squared · · Score: 1

    RUN FOR YOUR LIVES! Someone, find a shark to save me!

    --
    I don't get it.
  24. don't mess with the dolphins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't want to get into a fight with one of those dolphins. Fortunately dolphines are peaceful animals, unlike some humans.

    1. Re:don't mess with the dolphins by uberdave · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I was watching a show on this the other day. Apparently the dolphins are trained as if it is a game. When they kill for real they are traumatized by it and become useless to the navy at that point. Unfortunately they have no better means of dealing with underwater demolitions teams than tricking fun-loving creatures into becoming murderers.

    2. Re:don't mess with the dolphins by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Funny

      So basically, some marine biologist read "Ender's Game," and wrote a really good budget proposal....

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    3. Re:don't mess with the dolphins by czarangelus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hey, they treat the dolphins as bad as they treat people!

      --
      When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.
  25. In other news... by overclocker1337 · · Score: 2

    In other news today, Dr. Evil has issued a reward for the return of his precious aquatic minions

  26. WHat's next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sharks with 'frickin laser beams', now dolphins with 'toxic darts'.

    What's next? Whales with tasers?

  27. Movie plot by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This sounds like a plot right out of a B sci-fi action movie; the kind where you go, "nah, that can't happen".

    1. Re:Movie plot by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hey, I just had a great idea for a B sci-fi movie! It's totally unrelated to what we're discussing here, but it involves killer dolphins and a big hurricane. The tagline: "God made them smart. Man made them killers. Nature set them free!"

    2. Re:Movie plot by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just have big-breasted dolphins, and we have a hit on our hands here

    3. Re:Movie plot by operagost · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Because it can't. In order to believe this story, we're to believe that not only has the U.S. military trained dolphins to attack divers, but

      Out of many thousands of miles of U.S. coastline, they picked New Orleans, which is below sea level and prone to flooding;

      They were not smart enough to evacuate these valuable and dangerous animals before the hurricane;

      They didn't bother to remove the weapons from the animals;

      They didn't even think to UNLOAD the weapons. Apparently, these dolphins swim around fully armed, 24-7!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    4. Re:Movie plot by Jeremi · · Score: 1
      Just have big-breasted dolphins, and we have a hit on our hands here


      Dolphins being mammals, that should be possible... but just where are the breasts on a dolphin? They must be very well hidden...

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    5. Re:Movie plot by NeuralAbyss · · Score: 4, Informative

      Hate to discontinue the comedy thread in this article, but dolphins don't have breasts. The females do have two or four mammary slits either side of their genital slit, on the ventral side of their tail.

    6. Re:Movie plot by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 1

      The females do have two or four mammary slits either side of their genital slit...

      How boring--I'm glad I'm not a dolphin.

      Actually, it's probably for the best. We're making a Sci-fi, here, not furry porn.

      Come to think of it, though... that's a completely untapped market! When's the last time you saw "Lust of the Wereseal" or something at the back room of the local Video Shack?

      Man, this could be like buying stock in AOL (back in the 90's)--you know you're going to hell, but at least you'll be rich when you get there!

      Wait, do furries have money? Never mind. Let's just go with the sci-fi thing.

      Maybe we could pull a Strangelove here, and make a movie that so accurately reproduces the Navy's classified plans that it makes their brass nervous. What an idea.

    7. Re:Movie plot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Genius, we'll cast Jessica Alba and put her in a bikini. In fact, forget the dolphins and the hurricane!

    8. Re:Movie plot by jandrese · · Score: 4, Funny

      Stop it! You're killing the story with common sense! Can't you see that it was happy and free and then you came along and had to kill it. I hope you're happy now.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    9. Re:Movie plot by poopdeville · · Score: 5, Funny

      Mammary slits, huh? That sounds hot.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    10. Re:Movie plot by davesag · · Score: 1

      big breasted, naked and with samurai swords... then you'll have a hit.! and a best-selling follow-up game too!

      --
      I used to have a better sig than this, but I got tired of it
    11. Re:Movie plot by Crunchie+Frog · · Score: 1
      Hate to discontinue the comedy thread in this article, but dolphins don't have breasts. The females do have two or four mammary slits either side of their genital slit, on the ventral side of their tail.

      mammary slits eh ?

      Phwoooaaaarrrrrrr!
      --
      --- Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity
    12. Re:Movie plot by AmigaAvenger · · Score: 1

      the LEAST you could have done is at least included a Jessica Alba bikini image link. think man think!!

    13. Re:Movie plot by raoul666 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The females do have two or four mammary slits either side of their genital slit, on the ventral side of their tail.

      Sounds like fun. :D

      --
      When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl
    14. Re:Movie plot by cibyr · · Score: 1

      We're to believe that not only has the U.S. military trained dolphins to attack divers
      Not entirely sure I believe it, but I'd heard it before - from my boss, who is ex-navy.

      Out of many thousands of miles of U.S. coastline, they picked New Orleans, which is below sea level and prone to flooding;
      Well, so did a lot of other people...

      They were not smart enough to evacuate these valuable and dangerous animals before the hurricane;
      See previous point

      They didn't bother to remove the weapons from the animals;
      The dolphins are the weapons. They didn't bother to move them so why would they bother to dismantle them?

      They didn't even think to UNLOAD the weapons. Apparently, these dolphins swim around fully armed, 24-7!
      Maybe I'm missing something, but that makes sense to me...

      --
      It's not exactly rocket surgery.
    15. Re:Movie plot by sd_diamond · · Score: 1

      Hate to discontinue the comedy thread in this article, but dolphins don't have breasts. The females do have two or four mammary slits either side of their genital slit, on the ventral side of their tail.

      Keep it up. That sort of talk will get you on a DoJ watch list.

    16. Re:Movie plot by KevinIsOwn · · Score: 1

      The dolphins are not the weapons. The toxic dart mounted to the dolphin is the weapon. Without the toxic dart, the worst thing the dolphin can do is glare and oddly point it's head directly at you...

    17. Re:Movie plot by NeuralAbyss · · Score: 1

      Not my worry.. I'm not in the states. We don't have the feds looking up 'deviant porn'. Well, not officially, at least.

    18. Re:Movie plot by Boronx · · Score: 2, Funny

      Isn't it obvious that they were armed precisely because the hurricane was about to hit, so that if they were washed away they could fight their way back to civilization.

      Many sea creatures were washed inland instead of out to see. It seems likely that at least one of them lost its memory in the accident. Cared for by some simple, ignorant folk after the hurricane, he's now making his way to Switzerland to investigate the only clue to his identity: a bank account number embedded into a microchip in his dorsal fin.

      Woe be unto him and his handlers when he finds out his true nature.

    19. Re:Movie plot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hey smartguy, you try to remove the dart-gun from a dolphin's head without getting shot.

      Those dolphins are evil once you run out of fish. --the US Navy

    20. Re:Movie plot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ahh, but they do have muscular control over the entire depth of their genitals, much like the male dolphins have prehensile penises.

    21. Re:Movie plot by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1
      Yeah, once we believe that, we might as well believe that out of the thousands of miles of US coastline, they'd built a city below sea level and prone to flooding; they weren't smart enought to evacuate their citizens before the hurricane; they didn't bother to stockpile food and other supplies or to provide adequate shelter.

      Ok, I concede that your point about the dolphins being armed 24-7 is good, but I don't think mere incompetence and inertia qualifies for the "unlikely" status...

    22. Re:Movie plot by Zemran · · Score: 1

      Since when did a movie plot have to come anywhere near to credable? I went to see Transporter 2 last night and the driver hit a ramp at high speed to cause the car to summersault and knock a bomb off the underside on a passing crane before landing on all four wheels and continuing and you say armed dolphins are unacceptably ficticous? Get out and see some of the movies they have on now... I could not bring myself to watch the one with the car that thinks (Herbie 2) but armed dolphins are too credable to make it into the movies. They will have to teach them some martial arts before they get the part.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    23. Re:Movie plot by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 1

      "Hate to discontinue the comedy thread in this article, but dolphins don't have breasts."

      These are B-Movies we're talking about. In Hollywood. Surgical enhancement of breasts is practically mandatory.

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
    24. Re:Movie plot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you are saying is that, in order to believe this story to be true, we must first believe that the USA military is capable of incredible stupidity?

      Run! Killer dolphins!

    25. Re:Movie plot by NeuralAbyss · · Score: 1

      Surgical enhancement of dolphin breasts.. I'd hate to think of the hydrodynamic effect.. then again, maybe they could sit on the surface and swim around like a catamaran..

    26. Re:Movie plot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or rape you ...

    27. Re:Movie plot by ZerzaDha · · Score: 0

      Nah. The Story is still valid. Common sense can't be applied to things related to the military.

    28. Re:Movie plot by Ligur · · Score: 1

      "Jack the Flipper"?

      --
      Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast.
    29. Re:Movie plot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh heh, you said genital slit.

    30. Re:Movie plot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Umm, it is a plot right out of a sci-fi action movie from 1974, starring George C. Scott:

      The Day of the Dolphin.

      Can't believe no one else on slashdot knew this.

    31. Re:Movie plot by dangitman · · Score: 1
      They didn't even think to UNLOAD the weapons. Apparently, these dolphins swim around fully armed, 24-7!

      Well, what did you expect? Dolphins are badasses. You can have my toxic dart when you pry it from my cold, dead fin.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    32. Re:Movie plot by davez0r · · Score: 1

      i saw a preview for that movie this weekend.

      wtf.

    33. Re:Movie plot by Landshark17 · · Score: 1

      Kind of like that Halloween episode of The Simpsons where all the dolphins force humans into the ocean.

      http://www.snpp.com/episodes/BABF21

      --
      This sig is false.
    34. Re:Movie plot by spepper · · Score: 1

      somewhere, Charlton Heston is smiling---

    35. Re:Movie plot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe this is what was actually shooting at the contracters and the rescue personel.

  28. Obligatory South Park/Simpsons reference by abergou · · Score: 1

    Simpsons already did it.

  29. You know by CptChipJew · · Score: 0, Troll

    The US military is getting way too much money if they have enough to experiment with stuff like this.

    --
    Vonal Declosion
    1. Re:You know by Phil06 · · Score: 1

      I agree they have too much money but this story is a complete and total load of crap.

      --
      "...and yet, I blame society" Duke - Repo Man
    2. Re:You know by DrIdiot · · Score: 1
      Why is parent modded flamebait? It is, in no way, flamebait.

      It's a perfectly valid opinion shared my many people, and if you disagree, that's no reason to mark it flamebait.

    3. Re:You know by megaversal · · Score: 1

      Haha, so true.

      --
      Sig!
  30. We are in trouble. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a hard enough time capturing my dog when he gets loose, and he doesn't even have any weapons. I fear we will lose a good deal of Marines in the fight to catch these dolphins. On the other hand, maybe they will have better luck finding bin Laden than we have...

  31. Frickin' dart guns by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1, Funny

    - You know, I have one simple request. And that is to have sharks with frickin' laser beams attached to their heads! Now evidently my cycloptic colleague informs me that that cannot be done. Ah, would you remind me what I pay you people for, honestly? Throw me a bone here! What do we have?
    - Dolphins.
    - ...Right.
    - They're US Navy dolphins.
    - Do they have frickin' dart guns attached to their heads?
    - Absolutely.
    - Oh well, that's a start.

  32. Natural enemies? by TheLoneDanger · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't dolphins with toxic darts be natural enemies of sharks with laser beams? Our only hope would seem to be if they fight and mutually destroy one another. If they should band together... may god help us all...

    --

    "But I trust in the people's capacity for reflection, rage and rebellion." -Oscar Olivera
  33. US armed dolphins vs Korean armed robots by timeToy · · Score: 1

    Which is the most stupid ?

    1. Re:US armed dolphins vs Korean armed robots by E8086 · · Score: 1

      Let's see, dolphins are already very intellegent natural predators, fortunately they're smart enough to know not to attack members of a species that can easily whipe them out. And robots are as smart as someone programs them to be, may or may not be any more effective than an airsoft gun on a tripod with motion sensor or it could be as useful as a Cylon or Borg.

      Dolphin mounted underwater dart guns, I'm thinking fake. It isn't that easy for a human to hit something with a spear gun. Yes, dolphins are natural hunters, but I don't believe they're used to using projectile weapons. Unless it's a dart strapped to their nose they ram the target with I don't see how such a device would work.

      --
      F7 doesn't work, ignore spelling and grammar
    2. Re:US armed dolphins vs Korean armed robots by timeToy · · Score: 1

      I was not thinking of the dolphins but to the men that mount darts on them.

  34. And Slashdot continues to slide... by gorim · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    The more Slashdot posts articles with such poor premise, especially the these pseudo-science tin-hat articles, the less I read Slashdot.

    1. Re:And Slashdot continues to slide... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't like the site stop reading it. Nobody cares if you stop reading it.

    2. Re:And Slashdot continues to slide... by VolciMaster · · Score: 1
      The more Slashdot posts articles with such poor premise, especially the these pseudo-science tin-hat articles, the less I read Slashdot.

      And yet.. you reply to the story...

  35. could be... by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Experts who have studied the US navy's cetacean training exercises claim the 36 mammals could be carrying 'toxic dart' guns.

    And every military aircraft that flies 'could be' carrying nuclear weapons.

    But they arent.

    1. Re: could be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But they arent.

      They're not? I think we're not doing everything in our power to combat terrorism. Focus people! Terrorists live in deserts, freakin' gun totting dolphins won't help us here!?

    2. Re: could be... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      And every military aircraft that flies 'could be' carrying nuclear weapons.

      Flies and Bees with nuclear weapons? Oh shit!

    3. Re: could be... by Lexomatic · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Naval Dolphin Trainer 1: Hey, dude?

      Naval Dolphin Trainer 2: Yeah?

      Naval Dolphin Trainer 1: The mother of all hurricanes is about to come down on us.

      Naval Dolphin Trainer 2: So?

      Naval Dolphin Trainer 1: You think we should strap-up our dolphins with a full rack of poison dart guns right about now?

      Naval Dolphin Trainer 2: Hey dude! Good idea! *goes off to the munitions locker*

      Now I know the military can be stupid sometimes, but surely not stupid enough to have their trained killer dolphins armed up during an incoming major hurricane?

      Seriously?

    4. Re: could be... by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      Naval Dolphin Trainer 1: Hey, dude?

      Naval Dolphin Trainer 2: Yeah?

      Naval Dolphin Trainer 1: The mother of all hurricanes is about to come down on us.

      Naval Dolphin Trainer 2: So?

      Naval Dolphin Trainer 1: You think we should remove the full racks of poison dart guns from the dolphins right about now?

      Naval Dolphin Trainer 2: Hey dude! Got this on paper? 'Cause I have here the schedule for training this morning and the old guy said even if the world was about to end training must start on schedule. Want to get him angry? Go on, remove these racks, he will be after your ass, not mine.

      Naval Dolphin Trainer 1: I'll call him.

      Phone: Beeep Beeep Beeep

      General 'old guy' Important: [hauling his ass away from the disaster area and ignoring everything else]

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    5. Re: could be... by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This would be the same Navy that decided the best software to run an entire battle group was Windows, correct?

      Are they stupid enough to keep armed dolphins? You tell me.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    6. Re: could be... by tyler083 · · Score: 1

      the hurricane could have been a terrorist!!!!

    7. Re: could be... by Yanray · · Score: 2, Funny

      Given how the Hurricane has rectified the Republicans redistricting problems in Lousiana by shifting the fast hoards of refugees (see: Southern Urban Democrats) to firmly Republican districts in Texas (A firmly Republican State)I think it was all a ploy by the sifty SOB's in the Conservative Think Tanks. Castro was right we have had the ability to control Hurricanes and use them as weapons.......

      Sorry I have a strange thing about Fundy Conspiracy Theories.

      --
      --"Sorry for the inconvience." Gods Last Words to his Creation
      DNA, So Long and Thanks for all the Fish
  36. Flipper? by highwaytohell · · Score: 1

    Will the dolphins come back from active duty with Great Barrier Reef Syndrome and attempt suicide by swimming into plastic beer can holders?

  37. This just in... by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 5, Funny
    Chaos reigned in the administration today as it received a communication from "Skippy", a Navy-trained bottlenose dolphin who was liberated from his holding tank along with 35 other dolphins when Hurricane Katrina struck.

    In the communication, Skippy confirmed that he and the other dolphins were indeed armed, declared himself and his compatriots "freedom fighters" for an organization called the "Cetacean Liberation Front" or "CTF", and demanded that all other wrongfully imprisoned cetaceans be released immediately, or the group would initiate hostilities against surfers, SCUBA divers, and windsurfers.

    The following is a transcript of this communication:
    EeeeeeeEEE EEEe eree e E eEeeeeee eEee eEEEEE eEee EREEEEEEE EEEEEEEEE EeeeeEEE EE eEEEEE. EEEE E E eeEE eee EE E eEeeEeeee eeE EEEEe EeeE eeE EEEEEEEEEEEE! EEEEE eE e eEEE E EE e eeee eEE eEE eeeee EE EE e EEEEEEEE e EEEEEEEE!!! EEE! EEEE E E EEEEE E E EEEE EE EEEE EEEEE!!!

    At this point, the administration still has issued no official statement concerning this situation.
    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    1. Re:This just in... by fbg111 · · Score: 1

      an organization called the "Cetacean Liberation Front" or "CTF"

      Heh, somebody's been playing CounterStrike a little too much, me thinks...

      --
      Flying is easy, just throw yourself at the ground and miss. -Douglas Adams
    2. Re:This just in... by bclark · · Score: 1

      Best. Moderation. Ever.

    3. Re:This just in... by everphilski · · Score: 2, Funny

      In the communication, Skippy confirmed that he and the other dolphins were indeed armed, declared himself and his compatriots "freedom fighters" for an organization called the "Cetacean Liberation Front" or "CTF", and demanded that all other wrongfully imprisoned cetaceans be released immediately, or the group would initiate hostilities against surfers, SCUBA divers, and windsurfers.

      Not to be confused with the organization of their tree-dwelling brothers called the CLIT, the Coalition for Liberation of Itinerate Tree-dwellers, which is an extension of the LABIA, Liberate Apes Before Imprisoning Apes.

      Schnoogans.

      -everphilski-

    4. Re:This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      +5: Informative?!

      That's it. I'm not reading Slashdot anymore...

    5. Re:This just in... by C-Diddy · · Score: 1
      EeeeeeeEEE EEEe eree e E eEeeeeee eEee eEEEEE eEee EREEEEEEE EEEEEEEEE EeeeeEEE EE eEEEEE. EEEE E E eeEE eee EE E eEeeEeeee eeE EEEEe EeeE eeE EEEEEEEEEEEE! EEEEE eE e eEEE E EE e eeee eEE eEE eeeee EE EE e EEEEEEEE e EEEEEEEE!!! EEE! EEEE E E EEEEE E E EEEE EE EEEE EEEEE!!!
      Translation: "Screw you guys. I'm going home."
      --
      "Me fail English? That's unpossible." - Ralph
    6. Re:This just in... by RandomPrecision · · Score: 1
      Score:5, Informative?

      5, sure. But the informative part worries me a bit.

    7. Re:This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      please also dont confuse with The Committee for the Liberation and Integration of Terrifying Organisms and their Rehabilitation Into Society (or CLITORIS for short).

    8. Re:This just in... by Macsimus · · Score: 1

      Wow, so that's where Homer's "E" key went...

    9. Re:This just in... by LarsWestergren · · Score: 2, Funny

      The following is a transcript of this communication:

              EeeeeeeEEE EEEe eree e E eEeeeeee eEee eEEEEE eEee EREEEEEEE EEEEEEEEE EeeeeEEE EE eEEEEE. EEEE E E eeEE eee EE E eEeeEeeee eeE EEEEe EeeE eeE EEEEEEEEEEEE! EEEEE eE e eEEE E EE e eeee eEE eEE eeeee EE EE e EEEEEEEE e EEEEEEEE!!! EEE! EEEE E E EEEEE E E EEEE EE EEEE EEEEE!!!


      Translating machine: "We come in peace... We come in peace...."

      Crowd: "Ooohh! Ahhh!"

      The Dolphins open fire.

      Crowd: "Aaahh!!! Arrrrghh!"

      --

      Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die

    10. Re:This just in... by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      Informative? Mods have been smoking tuna again...

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    11. Re:This just in... by hplasm · · Score: 1, Funny
      ...to which the President replied:-

      "Oook Ook Ooooook!! Ook Ook Ooooook! Eeek! Eek! Oo oo oo ook!!"

      Film at 11.

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
    12. Re:This just in... by VolciMaster · · Score: 1

      ok, trying to be serious for just a moment...
      wouldn't they have to run out of ammo pretty fast... I mean, unless they have their own dolphin-run ammo dump or something. Those first 20 or 100 divers are just collateral damage... but then the buggers'll be out of darts.

    13. Re:This just in... by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 0, Redundant


      I'm certain that, forseeing this, the Navy trained these dolphins extensively in hand-to-hand tactics (well, hand to flipper, at any rate...).

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    14. Re:This just in... by VolciMaster · · Score: 1
      Kinda gives a whole new meaning to SEALs, doesn't it?



      but if they only have dart guns, the katana-wielding scuba divers will prevail!

      (Ok, so I don't know any scuba divers that carry katanas.)

  38. Fear mongering by enbody · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The article says they could be dangerous "if equipped with special harnesses carrying toxic darts." There is nothing to indicate that there is any evidence that they were armed. Think about it: with a Category 5 hurricane coming their way with days of warning they are going to leave them armed?

    Someone is fear mongering.

    1. Re:Fear mongering by tonyr60 · · Score: 1

      The article equally could have said they could be dangerous "if equipped with 50 Megaton Nuclear war heads" but did not. Is this because they did not want to spread fear and panic?????

    2. Re:Fear mongering by l810c · · Score: 1
      Thank You for the voice of reason.

      The odds of these dolphins escaping with the harnesses on is about 0%.

    3. Re:Fear mongering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Someone is fear mongering

      Nah, not in this country, not invented here.

    4. Re:Fear mongering by jobcello · · Score: 1

      Yeah, seems rather unlikely that they'd be left armed in captivity--unless the dolphins were actually being trained at the time that they got away. Obviously they weren't *on patrol* with live weapons.

      Probably the navy's main concern in recovery is all the investment that would be lost were the dolphins not recovered.

    5. Re:Fear mongering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, this is the military of the Good ol' US of A we're talking about here. "Friendly Fire" should never happen either, yet the first weeks of Iraq saw more troops shot and killed by their own than the enemy. Oops, sorry, I've moved on to Natural Selection.

    6. Re:Fear mongering by Jozer99 · · Score: 1

      Even if they aren't armed, do you want a pack of 36 600 lb animals with sharp teeth who natually kill sharks and who have been trained by the navy out while you are swimming? Dolphins are not cuddly in nature. They are predators. They eat large fish, and kill sharks when necissary.

    7. Re:Fear mongering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I've learned anything in the last 6 years, it's this:

      Think, then think again, about the motivation behind any public statement containing the word "terrorist."

      -AC

    8. Re:Fear mongering by commodoresloat · · Score: 1
      Think about it: with a Category 5 hurricane coming their way with days of warning they are going to leave them armed?

      They wanted them prepared for the looting that followed.

    9. Re:Fear mongering by stuckinkiel · · Score: 1

      Maybe claiming that the dolphins may be armed is fear mongering, but they do not have to be armed to be considered dangerous. In the early '90s I was a graduate student at San Diego State University in the Ecology department. I worked in a lab that specialized in marine plants. We had a project transplanting and monitoring (underwater) eelgrass beds on navy property in San Diego Bay. The eelgrass beds that we transplanted happened to be very near the dolphin pens of the Navy's marine mammal program. One day when we were about to start our dive when the Navy personnelle ordered us out of the water. It seems one of the dolphins had escaped from it's pen. They did not tell us directly that we were in danger, but they were pretty concerned that we get out of the water quickly. Who knows if they had been trained to attack divers, despite the official claims of the marine mammal program. I personally am not convinced that navy trained dolphins are not a danger to divers. Would you risk diving in an area with escaped dolphins on the loose?

    10. Re:Fear mongering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "and kill sharks when necissary."

      And get eaten by the larger varieties.

      In reality, dolphins tend to be pretty cuddly (towards humans) in nature... hence all of those "swim with the dolphins" vacations.

      I'd have to know what the dolphins were trained for before I decided to be scared by them.

    11. Re:Fear mongering by enbody · · Score: 1

      Even if they aren't armed, do you want a pack of 36 600 lb animals with sharp teeth who natually kill sharks and who have been trained by the navy out while you are swimming? Dolphins are not cuddly in nature.

      Dolphins are amazing animals with the potential to do harm, but are not naturally agressive to humans. One data point: I was swimming in South Carolina and had a juvenile dolphin curious about me approaching within 20 feet. Momma kept between me and Junior. I did not feel threatened, in fact, I was spell bound. The encounter lasted ten to fifteen minutes.

    12. Re:Fear mongering by ifwm · · Score: 1

      "Would you risk diving in an area with escaped dolphins on the loose?" Yes

  39. Well, this is pretty bad news... by heelios · · Score: 0, Redundant

    But let me be the first to welcome our armed dolphin overlords!

  40. Isn't it a bit late... by Jeian · · Score: 1

    ... for April Fools jokes?

    1. Re:Isn't it a bit late... by rawyin · · Score: 1

      What amazes me will be how many people actually believe this. :)

      Flying in the face of common sense (why in gods name would dolphins be kept in holding WEARING harnesses equipped with toxic darts?) this is assinine. I suppose this was just so they can swim around and shoot each other so they can have kinky dolphin action? "Oh yeah Flipper, that was a good one. Give me another hit."

      Seriously. Anyway, I'm sure the aliens will have picked them up long before we find them and left nothing but a floating bouy flashing "So long and thanks for all the fish" into the skyline.

  41. They Called Him... by SteevR · · Score: 5, Funny

    Flipper! Flipper!
    He'll Dart you Faster than lightning
    No Dolphin you see
    Has more bloodlust than he

    Thank the Navy! Navy!
    For this stupendous new blunder
    stalking there under...
    under the sea!

    --
    Performing sanity checks on your own beliefs is vital in avoiding poisoned koolaid.
  42. So long.... by VonGuard · · Score: 5, Funny

    and thanks for all the guns.

    --
    Don't Crease the Weasel!
    1. Re:So long.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:So long.... by zanderredux · · Score: 1
      Heh...

      I, for one, welcome our new dolphin overlords!

  43. they are smart , but... by stontu · · Score: 3, Funny

    how the heck dolphins knows who is a terrorist? and if they are trained since the cold war, they are trained to kill comunists... now...how the heck dolphins knows who is a communist?

    1. Re:they are smart , but... by Solr_Flare · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dolphins are very good at distinguishing items underwater. Likely they are trained so that they don't shoot anyone wearing something classified that can identify them underwater. That way they leave any navy divers alone. Anyone else who enters the waters around the sub gets shot. Which is probably also why the darts just incapacitate instead of kill in case someone accidentally wanders into the area.

      --
      You are who you are, let no one tell you different. But, never close your mind to a new point of view.
    2. Re:they are smart , but... by gremlins · · Score: 4, Informative

      The history channel had a show on the Dolphins. They are trained to do things like look for mines or spot enemy divers in a bay. If the dolphin sees a diver he doesn't know he will poke them with is nose. I don't think it matters who they are. The way this kills the diver is that the dolphins have these special nose guns that go off on inpact.

      --
      just because your a schizophrenic doesn't mean people arn't really out to get you
    3. Re:they are smart , but... by slashname3 · · Score: 1

      They are trained to pull the diver over and check their ID. Then they run the ID through the system to see if the diver is on the terrorist watch list. If they are on the list they back off a few feet, arm their dart guns and then shoot the divers.

      Of course this assumes that the dolphins ever leave the pub. Who's idea was it to give them dart guns to start with?

    4. Re:they are smart , but... by Zeph · · Score: 1
      how the heck dolphins knows who is a terrorist?
      They hire high school dropouts to "randomly" pull divers out of the current and examine their luggage more thoroughly.
    5. Re:they are smart , but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well duh! We put nametags on all the bad guys of cource! Y'know, like a big ol' sign that says "Shoot me in the forehead with a dart!" =P

    6. Re:they are smart , but... by EnderWiggin99 · · Score: 0, Troll

      This is fairly simple. You see, now that Communists are weak, your government has no reason to keep military spending high. Thus, terrorists were invented in order to keep your nation from looming and long overdue economic recession. I believe that both fall into the category of "people we hate but really don't understand why, so they obviously stand for everything we don't stand for."

      Thus, it's not a far step from Communists to Terrorists, to responsible drug users, to black people, to Canadians, and so on and so forth in that fashion.

      As to how the dolphins know the difference, I really do not know. They obviously have been able to create a method to train them, perhaps the same method terrorist masterminds use to recruit and retain their tools? Social animals can be easily coerced by diabolical types. Offer them friendships (or in this case refuse social contact until a set of objectives is met) and they will do anything you ask, and believe it is right.

      If this is the case, who is more evil; the U.S. doing this to protect innocent lives, or the 'terrorists' to protect innocent lives? Remember, innocent lives are always spared when the war is fought away from home soil; everyone in the opposing faction, civilian or not, is always considered grey.

    7. Re:they are smart , but... by Liam+Slider · · Score: 1
      Thus, terrorists were invented in order to keep your nation from looming and long overdue economic recession. I believe that both fall into the category of "people we hate but really don't understand why, so they obviously stand for everything we don't stand for."
      You know, I'm sure I remember some of these fictional, made-up terrorists flying aircraft into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.... Not to mention the attack on the U.S.S. Cole, a Navy ship...let me guess, another fictional incident? Same must be true of all those embassy bombings, the prior bombing of the World Trade Center, and the attacks against various US Military bases that go back decades...
    8. Re:they are smart , but... by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      You know, I'm sure I remember some of these fictional, made-up terrorists flying aircraft into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon....

      Actually no. The government flew those planes into the WTC and the Pentagon. The Illuminati wanted the US economy to suffer for a few days. Also, it was good national security strategy to attack the Department of Defense's main building.

      The USS Cole was actually attacked by aliens from Area 51 using secret German submarines. And they invented the bombing to cover it up.

      The embassies aren't actually embassies, they're secret nuclear laboratories so that we can blow up other countries. A few of them melted down. And they invented the terrorists to cover it up.

      And just for those who missed the sarcasm so far...the prior bombing of the WTC in 1993 was a staging run while the elder Bush was president.

      Meanwhile the Majestic Twelve is having fun wasting money on having random wars in random places instead of keeping themselves rich.

    9. Re:they are smart , but... by Stinking+Pig · · Score: 1

      10 diver hands out waterproofed copies of Socialist literature
        9 diver fails seven-part questionnaire (as a bonus, a high score on the questionnaire earns the foreign diver entry in a drawing for a student visa and a job at Burger King)
        8 diver hands out big round black bombs with long fuses that burn under water
        7 diver has an accent so thick you can hear it through a SCUBA regulator
        6 diver doesn't smell like Starbucks or Coca-Cola
        5 diver has gray sandpaper-like skin, many rows of sharp teeth, prominent dorsal fin
        4 diver's chest reads "my brother blew himself up in Tel Aviv and all I got was this lousy wetsuit"
        3 Internet background check on the diver turns up a UC Berkeley Peace and Conflict Studies Bachelor's degree
        2 diver's fingerprints match Che Guevara
        1 diver is not a dolphin

      --
      "Nothing was broken, and it's been fixed." -- Jon Carroll
    10. Re:they are smart , but... by cowscows · · Score: 1

      I don't know for sure, but it would seem to me that incapacitating someone underwater probably creates a pretty good chance that they're going to die, even if they have scuba gear on. Then again, I've only been diving a few times, and I've never seen anyone pass out while doing it, so maybe I'm wrong.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    11. Re:they are smart , but... by EnderWiggin99 · · Score: 1

      Sarcasm or not, do you notice a pattern?

      All but the Trade Centre and Pentagon attacks were carried out on American presences on foreign soil.

    12. Re:they are smart , but... by Excen · · Score: 0

      Well, if you're swimming with a hammer and sickle. . .

      --
      "No beer until you finish your tequila!" -Leela's Dad
    13. Re:they are smart , but... by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      I would imagine that provided you kept the regulator in your mouth you'd still be able to breathe but you wouldn't be able to control your bouyancy very effectively and might either sink or float to the surface. If you sank you probably wouldn't realise your air had ran out until it was too late to do anything about it.

    14. Re:they are smart , but... by GungaDan · · Score: 1

      Dolphins can profile as well as you and me. Of course they're gonna target the swimmers in turbans. Now, spotting communists... that's an entirely different kettle of fish, my chum.

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    15. Re:they are smart , but... by Liam+Slider · · Score: 1

      Technically, by matter of international law....an embassy is part of the "national soil" of the country who's embassy it is. Therefore, the attacks on American embassies are also attacks on American soil. Oh, but I suppose all the attacks on American soil just don't count as terrorism...

    16. Re:they are smart , but... by KC7GR · · Score: 1

      Let me put this as simply as possible. The Guardian's article isn't worth the fish-wrapper it's printed on. The Guardian itself has all the journalistic integrity of the Weekly World News and the Enquirer put together, and that's on a GOOD day. I don't exactly put a lot of faith in the History Channel either.

      You see, I've worked with dolphins at a couple of different parks, and I've done enough book-learning about them to last a lifetime. As if that's not enough, I've been to practically every oceanarium in the States, several foreign ones, and asked detailed questions of a hundred or so trainers and veterinarians over the last couple of decades to help further my knowledge of the critters.

      To top off all the above, I have a friend who was a senior animal trainer for the Navy's Marine Mammal Program for nearly 20 years. We've known each other longer than that, so I trust his word a lot more than I trust that of some crank newspaper and its "reliable" source.

      More to the point, I asked him once about the very allegations that papers like the Guardian have been making, on and off, for the last couple of decades. I knew that I'd get a straight answer out of him.

      I did, and it was pretty much what I expected. Dart-toting or weapon-equipped dolphins are little more than the stuff of (as others have pointed out) B-grade movies. Though the specifics of what he did in the program are classified, he was able to tell me that dolphins and sea lions are used for practice-munitions recovery, search-and-rescue, and similar such missions.

      No lasers, no dart guns (toxic or otherwise), no bombs, no robotic arms with nasty-looking grabbers, not even a scary sign. Sorry, folks.

      Is it technically possible to train dolphins to do as the Guardian article described? Sure it is. They're smart, playful, generally friendly, and very trainable. Working with them is like working with rowdy third-graders. However, the difficulty of telling friend from foe with 100% reliability (something the military would demand in any such situation) would present a pretty substantial obstacle.

      I would add that the weapon-toting dolphin myths are a favorite of animal-rights extremist groups, and are periodically toted out just to try and make headlines. Similar myths about armed dolphins in Camh Ranh Bay, Vietnam, emerged in the 70's (Google has nothing on this, BTW, as it happened long before the Internet was a driving force in the public eye. Check your local library).

      I may not have dug deep enough, but I've not seen anyone post this link to snopes.com as yet. They've got a write-up on this myth (and plenty of others).

      The only other thing I will add: Show me a live dolphin, equipped with a dart gun strapped to their body, and I will cheerfully STFU.

      Keep the peace(es).

      --

      Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

      Blue Feather Technologies

  44. Not a big deal by gremlins · · Score: 5, Informative

    I heard about 6 other dolphins from the area that got free and they found all 6 hanging out as close as they could get to their former pen.

    --
    just because your a schizophrenic doesn't mean people arn't really out to get you
    1. Re:Not a big deal by Cutriss · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Those were domesticated dolphins for the local aquarium (Marine Life), and thus were quite likely to stay close to the area, since that's where they get all their food. And actually, I heard that only three of them were in the immediate area following the storm - the other three had to be located and I believe they were still in the Mississippi Sound. In the event of an impending tropical system, they typically move these dolphins to a swimming pool at a Best Western hotel that was located just north of US 90 in Gulfport.

      That hotel is completely gone now, of course.

      Not that I actually believe much of this fish tale, but I would think that if these dolphins were being used for such a purpose, they would be tagged with radio transponders so that just such a situation like this one could be handled. The transponders could always be removed if the "soldiers" were to actually be deployed.

      --
      "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
    2. Re:Not a big deal by gremlins · · Score: 1

      I know they were domesticated dolphins, I was just guessing the other dolphins would behave in a similar way

      --
      just because your a schizophrenic doesn't mean people arn't really out to get you
  45. Could the dolphins train other dolphins? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    But those who have studied the controversial use of dolphins in the U.S. defence programme claim it is vital they are caught quickly.

    I think they fear the notion of these dolphins training other dolphins to attack humans.

  46. Eh.. by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    Well, its not quite sharks, but it'll do....it'll do....

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  47. Right... by Spetiam · · Score: 1

    "Experts who have studied the U.S. navy's cetacean training exercises claim the 36 mammals could be carrying 'toxic dart' guns."

    Right, because the dolphins would be equipped, locked and loaded when held (i.e., not engaged in training exercises) in "their coastal compound."

    Oh wait, I forgot to put on my tin foil hat.

    There we go... Egads!!! I must now cancel my scuba trip in the Gulf!

  48. Go kill Bud! by penguin_strut · · Score: 1
    Luckily, dolphins are notoriously poor dart-hunters...thank god they weren't armed with their requisite slingshots, which they've been known to use for highly ritualized "ethnic cleansings." Why do you think that most large semitic populations are inland?

    Ahem...trained to shoot terrorists?! Is part of their plan to break our collective will coordinated attacks on Sea World and the nation's beaches?

    "Sir, Officer Toodles noticed that you were wearing an especially bulky overcoat this July..."

  49. Oh, ok. Right. This is believable. by bazonkers · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Are you trying to tell me that these dolphins are sitting around in their tanks with 'toxic dart' guns attached to them AT ALL TIMES? Do they shoot these darts from their asses? I can believe that maybe there are trained dolphins, and maybe they escaped, but that they can shoot unsuspecting divers with toxic dart guns?
    Please. What a craptastic, misleading headline for Slashdot. I don't comment much here on Slashdot but in the name of all that is holy, who posts this crap?

    At least it's not a dupe, yet.

    1. Re:Oh, ok. Right. This is believable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, the title of the post could not be more misleading, clearly these dolphins were *not* armed when/if released into the gulf.

      And FWIW the militatry have been using dolphins for over 40 years to keep ports clear of enemy divers. Its old news. The dolphins are very good at it.

    2. Re:Oh, ok. Right. This is believable. by slashname3 · · Score: 1

      They were just relaxing in the pub having a few pints playing darts when the hurricane hit. So yes, they were wearing their dart guns while off duty. How the heck do you expect them to play darts at the pub?

    3. Re:Oh, ok. Right. This is believable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude, chill the fuck out.

      this is the funniest thing i've seen on /. in a long time. if you have problems with slashdot... then JUST DONT READ IT. you don't need to be bitchy and ruin it for others.

      fucker

    4. Re:Oh, ok. Right. This is believable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may not post much, but you definitely conform perfectly to slashdot memes (:

      OMGZORS BAD STORY, OMGZORS DUPEZORS! MISLEAIDING!!!11one!!eleven!!1

    5. Re:Oh, ok. Right. This is believable. by lxs · · Score: 1

      Are you trying to tell me that these dolphins are sitting around in their tanks with 'toxic dart' guns attached to them AT ALL TIMES?

      Well why would you have a crack dolphin squad if you couldn't deploy them at a moments notice? Marine threats can occur at any time.

      Do they shoot these darts from their asses?

      Don't be silly. An ass would drown faster than a horse when ridden by an armed attack dolphin.

      I don't comment much here on Slashdot but in the name of all that is holy, who posts this crap?

      I have it on good authority that this article was submitted by slashdot user karvind and posted by Hemos.

      At least it's not a dupe, yet.

      Go on! Submit the article now! Taco or Zonk is bound to read it and post it within 24 hours.

  50. Those are some badass sea mammals. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So long, and thanks for all the fish motherf*ckers!

  51. Lame jokes by Viper+Daimao · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Talk about being thrown a freakin bone here. Its like the editors are asking for 100s of Dr Evil jokes. Just go watch the movie people!

    --
    "In the game of life, someone always has to lose. To me, if life were fair, that someone would always be Oklahoma." -DKR
  52. It's because of the walls in the pens. by TheGuano · · Score: 2, Funny

    There's something about them. They make you institutionalized. At first you hate them. Then you learn to live with them. And before you know it, you find yourself depending on them.

    1. Re:It's because of the walls in the pens. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Outside, the world went and got itself in a big damn hurry.--- No mod ponits to give, but thanks.

    2. Re:It's because of the walls in the pens. by magefile · · Score: 1

      Is this a reference to A Clockwork Orange? 'Cuz it could just as easily be a ref. to The Yellow Wallpaper, except that the tone is not quite right, and it sounds like a quote.

    3. Re:It's because of the walls in the pens. by aaza · · Score: 1

      It's Red (Morgan Freeman) from The Shawshank Redemption

      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice.
      In practice, however, there is.
  53. Fish Tale by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    "And you should've seen the one that got away!"

  54. I for one... by relifram66 · · Score: 1

    I for one welco... Never mind.

  55. Hysteria by tarranp · · Score: 1

    I don't think the dolphins are equipped with their arms while living in the holding tanks. Such weapons, if they still exist, would be typically strapped on at the beginning of a patrol.

    I smell some fear-mongering here

  56. hacked dolphins = aquatic terrorism by illlfates · · Score: 2, Interesting

    from the article:
    "Usually dolphins were controlled via signals transmitted through a neck harness. 'The question is, were these dolphins made secure before Katrina struck?' said Sheridan."

    Is this to imply that these dolphins aren't relying on their friendly master's familiar scent or unique vocal pattern?? Their friendly master might not be friendly at all, and just a computer operated by a human, and any human at that!

    I must find these dolphins.

  57. Meanwhile, somewhere in the Atlantic Ocean.... by daranz · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Conn, sonar! We have an unidentified contact, bearing three-five-niner, range unknown!"
    "What the hell? That sounds really weird... I never heard anything that quiet, but yet surely, there's something th---"
    "DARTS IN THE WATER! Incoming darts!"

    Next day:
    An American Sub Sunk During Routine Exercises
    The DoD still hasn't released any detailes about the incident, although they have confirmed that a Seawolf class submarine took a hit from an unknown weapon during a routince training exercise in the northern part of the Atlantic. It is speculated that the submarine was wrongly identified as a terrorist vessel by a squadron of the Dolphin Anti-Terrorist Task force. The Departament of Defense refused to comment.

    --
    This is a sig. It is appended to the end of comments I post.
  58. poor you... by weighn · · Score: 1
    I think its great. Can't wait for the coverage of how homoginized milk is eating holes in my brain and how drinking colloidal silver will save me.

    Meanwhile, I think these dolphins will head for the nearest node in the global grid system, gather a bunch of other dolphins together and plan the downfall of our corrupt leaders. It's a joke...

    --
    Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths
  59. I guess they had it right on the Simpsons... by HerculesMO · · Score: 1

    Dolphins will soon rule the world.

    Oh well, I guess there are worse ways to go. At least we won't be ruled by catfish. They are some ugly motherfuckers. :)

    --
    The price is always right if someone else is paying.
    1. Re:I guess they had it right on the Simpsons... by Mr.Progressive · · Score: 1

      Snorky... talk... man...

      --
      Okay, so a philosopher, a philologist, and a philatelist walk into a bar...
    2. Re:I guess they had it right on the Simpsons... by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 1

      Well at least (if it's like on the Simpsons) we'll be allowed to live. Hey, look at the bright side - at least we'll have more than sea monkeys and goldfish as pets! Too bad we won't be able to have cable anymore, though. . .

  60. they're not always 'learning' what you think... by SuperBanana · · Score: 5, Informative
    The US Atlantic bottlenose dolphins have apparently been taught to shoot terrorists attacking military vessels.

    Huh. How'd they do that?

    I hope they didn't do it in the same way the Russian army taught dogs to drop satchel charges under German tanks. You see, they used Russian tanks to train them. So when they got into battle with the Germans, what did the dogs do when given live, armed satchel charges? Delivered them right under Russian tanks, of course. That plan was rather quickly abandoned.

    The US Army hasn't faired much better; they armed bats with incendiary devices- the plan was that, release from a plane over Japan, they'd find refuged in building overhangs and whanot. They were kept calm by refridgeration. So during one of the trial runs (incidentally, the first trial run with live ammo), some genius decides they need a picture of the bats. It's pitch dark, so the photographer uses a flash. Which not only wakes up the bats, but startles them as well...

    ...and as they say, "hilarity ensued."

    1. Re:they're not always 'learning' what you think... by Forbman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They mostly train them to identify and tag mines and underwater IEDs.

      The most critical part about retrieving them is not that they *could* "attack" divers with their head-mounted laser beams (where are those sharks when you need them), but that they've been captive-raised all their lives, much like the dolphins at the SeaWorld parks.

    2. Re:they're not always 'learning' what you think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This concludes our test of the "Gullibility Warning System".

    3. Re:they're not always 'learning' what you think... by vmahrra · · Score: 1

      what we need is sharks with frickin' laser beams on their heads

    4. Re:they're not always 'learning' what you think... by paxmark1 · · Score: 1

      Actually I believe Harold the Fair Haired made matches he supposedly attached to birds tails in a siege of a Sicilian town about a thousand years ago. Supposedly it worked. Later he went onto become King of Norway.

      peace, mark

    5. Re:they're not always 'learning' what you think... by geomon · · Score: 1

      what we need is sharks with frickin' laser beams on their heads

      RABID sharks with fricken' laser beams on their heads...

      --
      "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
  61. Guys, they're used for mine clearing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See http://www.dolphinlovers.com/dolphins-mine.php

    Slashdot is getting exceedingly silly lately. If we want silliness, well go to democraticunderground or dailykos, thanks very much.

  62. US Space Command...to the rescue! by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 3, Funny

    General Lance Lord, we need you!

      General "Ohhh, so now you like our dolphin jamming satellites!"

  63. I know who did it by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    It was Gil. He was feeling Blue, because he found his wife perched with his walleyed neighbor. But the wife was such a sucker. It turned out that the neighbor was more of a minnow rather than a bass.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  64. Oblig. Johnny Mnemonic by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 1

    What's next? Crack-addled dolphins?

  65. Atlantis has Nukes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In a press conference today the United States Secreatary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld announced the impending invasion of the lost city of Atlantis to prevent them from developing nuclear armaments. Although he could provide no actual proof that the lost city exists he stated that information from reliable sources pinpointed it near newly discovered underwater oil fields off the coast of Cuba.

  66. When I started reading slashdot by Dogun · · Score: 1

    Articles like this weren't poluting the front page. Honestly, if it's a slow news day, it's a slow news day.

    1. Re:When I started reading slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and I guess back then that they had to ration the "l"s, too, because everyone was so poor?

  67. Obligatory movie reference by NoxiousB · · Score: 1

    What, no sea bass with lasers ?

  68. You have to be kidding by WindBourne · · Score: 2, Funny

    HOW did this get marked informative, when at best, you are funny (though not really). Just out of curiosity, would you know who that A.C. is that it running around and knocking one editor and trying to replace him with you?

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:You have to be kidding by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Psst... look at the article's icon.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:You have to be kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Psst, the article icon says funny, science and politics. TMM is marked informative 2x on his post. the GP points that out and ask TMM if he is the AC that is pushing him. But your point totally eludes me. Pray tell, what exactly where you getting at. Surely not a leak.

    3. Re:You have to be kidding by StonedRat · · Score: 2, Informative

      Imformative increases karma, funny does not. That's why some mods mark it imformative if they're feeling generous.

      --
      "Religion is the most malevolent of all mind viruses." - Arthur C. Clarke.
    4. Re:You have to be kidding by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I did not know that.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    5. Re:You have to be kidding by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Funny

      TMM's comment is "informative" in the same way the article is "informative." Get it now?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  69. "Mr. Flipper's Revenge" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh man oh man oh man...

    does anyone remember, back in the old days when Night Flight on USA made late night weekend TV bearable, particularly when enhanced by various molecules, an overdub of "Transformers" series or the like called "Dynaman"?

    The evil dolphin episode had been recast as Mr. Flipper, a CIA-trained assassin Vietnam vet dolphin who'd been cut loose and turned rogue, planning to turn fish into hippies (grow scales long, drop out of school, etc) among other mayhem.

    on topic: "mindless entertainment? or prescient geniuses????"

    main purpose of post: "WHO THE EFFING HELL HAS THESE ON TAPE?"
    in a plea for attention my housemate's then GF 'borrowed' them and we never saw them again... 'course, the plea for attention worked since 15+ years later I STILL HATE HER

  70. Evolutionary advantage by DrIdiot · · Score: 1
    The navy better hope these toxic-dart dolphins don't have an evolutionary advantage.

    It's like when the dolphins exile humans to the sea in the Simpsons when their king dolphin escapes from SeaWorld.

    This calls for one thing...
    We gotta start setting up more beach volleyball nets.

  71. Aquatic Death Mammals! by Nastard · · Score: 1

    I hate to say I told you so, but...

  72. Paranoid conjecture, no facts, great story! (Not.) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "It may be the oddest tale to emerge from the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. Armed dolphins, trained by the US military to shoot terrorists and pinpoint spies underwater, may be missing in the Gulf of Mexico."

    hmm, lotta "mays" there... Let's see who it is making the claims...

    Experts who have studied the US navy's cetacean training exercises claim the 36 mammals could be carrying 'toxic dart' guns. Divers and surfers risk attack, they claim, from a species considered to be among the planet's smartest.

    "Experts"? What "experts"? Who says they are? What makes them an "expert"? What are their qualifications? And this isn't something they know, they're just "claiming" it's possible. Oh, OK, it's on the internet, it must be true...

    The US Atlantic bottlenose dolphins have apparently been taught to shoot terrorists attacking military vessels. Their coastal compound was breached during the storm, sweeping them out to sea. But those who have studied the controversial use of dolphins in the US defence programme claim it is vital they are caught quickly.

    "Apparently" - more conjecture. The compound was breached and they were swept to sea, the article claims, yet without any corroboration yet. So they *know* this? Or they are just stating it as a fact that you, the gullible reader, wants to believe, wants to trust in? Hey, it makes for a great story, right?!?

    "Leo Sheridan, 72, a respected accident investigator who has worked for government and industry, said he had received intelligence from sources close to the US government's marine fisheries service confirming dolphins had escaped."

    Oh, I'm sorry! "Leo" said so, and he worked for the gov't in some nebulous capacity, so you *know* you can trust him, right!?! And, even if he's not "experts", well, he is an "expert", right? And we aren't really concerned with that sort of thing - what's it called - um, "accuracy" - here in this story are we? Anyway, we have to know that Leo is right and just and honest, especially since he has "sources", and we all know that anonymous sources are unimpeachable, a la the NYT, a paragon of reporting honesty and non-bias. Just like the Guardian is, apparently...

    "'My concern is that they have learnt to shoot at divers in wetsuits who have simulated terrorists in exercises. If divers or windsurfers are mistaken for a spy or suicide bomber and if equipped with special harnesses carrying toxic darts, they could fire,' he said."

    What a great guy Leo is! He is "concerned" - that is, he doesn't know this to be true, it just worries him. What a wonderful person, to be worrying about all those folks he doesn't know who might possibly - if the story is true, and if a dolphin has a harness on (yet another unconfirmed, conjectural supposition) and if that dolphin thinks this stranger to Leo is a terrorist then the dolphin might put said stranger to sleep and they might not be found for hours and might die. OMG! It's almost certain!!!

    Let's hope the dolphins were made secure before the storm, because we don't have a clue if they were or not, just like we don't have a clue even if they are out there, just like we don't have a clue if they are that they might be wearing harnesses with supposed toxic darts that, just like we don't have a clue they might even use against some innocent! But man, what a hell of a military bashing story this is! w00t!

    "The mystery surfaced when a separate group of dolphins was washed from a commercial oceanarium on the Mississippi coast during Katrina. Eight were found with the navy's help, but the dolphins were not returned until US navy scientists had examined them."

    Oh, those nasty nasty military guys! You know they are always up to some bad, bad purpose! Be very careful if you ever see one! They carry guns, some of them! Yeesh!

  73. Navy attack dolphins... by JRHelgeson · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, if the Navy Dolphins have been released, there can be only one solution... There is ony one team that can bring them back.

    We must release the Navy Seals ...

    (Sorry, had to be said)

    --
    Good security is based upon reality and common sense. Common sense is a function of having common knowledge.
    1. Re:Navy attack dolphins... by konquererz · · Score: 0

      Lol, I saw that one coming! I guess the gulf is safe from terrorist now!

    2. Re:Navy attack dolphins... by CupBeEmpty · · Score: 1

      Oh I thought this might be a job for.... Ace Ventura, pet detective? (too old school?)

    3. Re:Navy attack dolphins... by justforaday · · Score: 1

      (too old school?)

      Nope. Just lame...Really really lame...(As were the movies)

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
  74. Wit and Slashdot by kaladorn · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is the most brilliant thing you've ever seen here?

    Resisting my immediate Pythonesque urge to say "No, it isn't." and start an argument (the long course), I thought about that.

    I guess that might make Slashdot the antithesis of the US Air Force then. Their slogan is "aim high". Slashdots might be "aim low and keep sinking" (as far as particularly sharp witticisms go).

    Obviously, this post just proves the point. My IronyDetector(TM) is in overload mode.

    Anyway, I don't seal what the big flapper is about this cod-forsakenly-bad humour. This isn't the funniest bit since Noah's shark. And we keep hoping it dolphin ish up soon. Further posts could make folks crabby. You'd have to be a strange manta want more. It's an eel impulse, I tell you. Perch the thought!

    (Okay, that was a poor copy of the original few, who used up most of the good seafood...)

    --
    -- Mal: "Well they tell you: never hit a man with a closed fist. But it is, on occasion, hilarious."
    1. Re:Wit and Slashdot by banzaimonkey · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think you keeled it.

    2. Re:Wit and Slashdot by maharg · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Sheeesh - there's a time and a plaice ...

      --

      $ strings FTP.EXE | grep Copyright
      @(#) Copyright (c) 1983 The Regents of the University of California.
    3. Re:Wit and Slashdot by mikiN · · Score: 1

      ... Pythonesque urge to say "No, it isn't." ... ...and I always thought that pythons would try to strangle their victims instead of arguing with them. Now at least I have one counter-example.

      --
      The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
    4. Re:Wit and Slashdot by mikiN · · Score: 1

      argueing... duh.

      Seems I still need to be on the lookout for that elusive spell-checkered garter snake... It must be around here somewhere...

      --
      The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
    5. Re:Wit and Slashdot by rizole · · Score: 1

      Enough already.....It's giving me a hadock!

    6. Re:Wit and Slashdot by Justus · · Score: 1

      Except that you had it right the first time...

    7. Re:Wit and Slashdot by ramblin+billy · · Score: 1


      Could THIS be what you seek? Or maybe you'd prefer it in BOOKMARKLET form?

      billy - no,no...think nothing of it...I know I do

  75. First the plague carrying mice... by Exluddite · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First the plauge carrying mice disappear, and now dolphins with dart guns might have gotten loose. Maybe we are the third smartest species and they're just building up their arsenal....

    --
    What does this button do...
  76. FFS! by AndreiK · · Score: 1

    Ok, who the hell has been playing with the moderation? How is that +5, informative?

    This article has some of the worst moderation ever - of course, many people are avoiding it, but that's no excuse.

    1. Re:FFS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, you need to smoke the crack-pipe more often... makes one more relaxed you know.

    2. Re:FFS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the GP is *gasp* right?

  77. I heard... by Zouden · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...the dolphins are trained to kill insturgeons.

    (sorry!)

    --
    "A week in the lab saves an hour in the library"
  78. Lucky for the Koreans by Dingo_aus · · Score: 1

    Lucky for the Koreans that specs for their new combat robots don't require operation underwater - the US have that. Rule Dolphtainia! Dolphtania rules the waves!

  79. Naval use for dolphins by LucianJMU · · Score: 1

    A few summers back I was in San Francisco taking a boat tour of the bay and as our boat was passing some naval facility (SPAWARS?), the guide mentioned that facility was training dolphins. Someone then asked why the hell the navy would spend a great deal of money to train dolphins? The guide informed us that the dolphins were trained to swim around US Naval Vessels and if a scuba diver came within a certain proximity of the boat the dolphines would ram the diver in the ribs and neck and force him/her to surface whereupon they would then be shot. I dont know how this dude knows but it certainly provides for a great mental picture of flipper beating the shit out of the most suprised saboteur ever.

    --
    Open source is the difference between trust and anti-trust
  80. underwater overlords by vveak · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome our toxic dart gun carrying, underwater overlords.

  81. In Soviet Russia... by Mr.Gerald · · Score: 1

    ...dolphins arm you.

    --
    --Friends don't let friends do frames.
  82. Mod TFA funny by biraneto2 · · Score: 1

    Missing info from the article: The dolphins are wearing a necklace that hold their guns. These guns are fired by brain waves, at the dolphin's will. The device is powered by cold fusion, wich have been developed in secrecy by the US Navy for more than 5 years now. Saying so, the dolphins are extremelly valuable as the necklace power may be endless. Also it is confirmed that some retired KGB agents that were living in New Orleans are already in possession of the cold fusions plans and in their way to mother soviet russia and China. We are all doomed.

  83. Lasers by DavidD_CA · · Score: 1

    Bring on the "friggin' lasers" jokes.

    --
    -David
  84. What are the odds .... by Chuckstar · · Score: 1

    ...that even if this program exists, that the 'toxic dart' guns are permanently attached to the dolphins or that someone left them attached during the hurricane?

  85. Call me Ishmael by banzaimonkey · · Score: 0

    Captain Ahab, is that you?

    1. Re:Call me Ishmael by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1

      Is that you John Wayne? Is this me?

      --
      Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
    2. Re:Call me Ishmael by Rob_Warwick · · Score: 1
      If he's you, and you're him, am I still me?

      Who's eating this chicken?

  86. Obligatory... by programmerar · · Score: 1

    I would like to be the first to say welcome to our bottle-nosed overlords!!

  87. A whole year already? by barryman_5000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is it april 1st already?

  88. Terrorists by Bastian · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    The U.S. Atlantic bottlenose dolphins have apparently been taught to shoot terrorists attacking military vessels.

    Ahem. . . isn't a key part of the definition of the term "terrorist" that they attack civilian targets?

    Or have we officially redefined the term to include anyone who attacks an American anything under any circumstances, ever?

    1. Re:Terrorists by convolvatron · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      actually anyone we dont like. you understand how it is, times are harsh.

  89. Re:That dumbfuck Zonk... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks, Zonk. You do a good job of relating negative comments concerning your postings. You do a very good job.

  90. Wel I would... by MajorDick · · Score: 1

    Pull the old lasers on the head schtic, but man, this is actually kinda scarry.

    I mean really, no moral tirade about fuzzy, well squeeky cute animals etc.

    But the question I have is how LONG will they go uncaptured, I mean is this something we need to worry about for a year or two ?

    And better yet who has the fire button ? Flipper himself ?

  91. Were the dolphins ill-tempered? by txmadman · · Score: 1

    I had no luck with the sea bass...

    1. Re:Were the dolphins ill-tempered? by direwulf · · Score: 1

      They're...mutated...dolphins.

  92. A serious post by SnowZero · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There have been stories about the marine mammal program before, and regular fights with animal rights groups. It is no longer classified though, so anyone can go find out plenty of information at the project's official website. You can also check out their FAQ. It pretty clearly states that dolphins and sea lions are only used for marking and tagging, and that they are not used offensively since they can't really distinguish friendly forces and foes. It seems some people still refuse to give up on speculation however.

    Anyway, I seriously doubt that dolphins are being used with poison darts, since the Navy seems to prefer using sea lions now (They don't need storage pools, work better in tight areas like harbors and piers, and tolerate more varying temperatures). And even if there *were* poison dart weilding dolphins, why on earth would they be left armed while at a training facility during a storm?

    1. Re:A serious post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "why on earth would they be left armed while at a training facility during a storm?"

      'cause that's, uh, US Army? Why do you assume there would be anyone smart enough NOT to do this?

    2. Re:A serious post by hkb · · Score: 1

      And even if there *were* poison dart weilding dolphins, why on earth would they be left armed while at a training facility during a storm?


      Because its the military, duh.

      --
      /* Moderating all non-anonymous trolls up since 2004 */
    3. Re:A serious post by Stalemate · · Score: 1

      And even if there *were* poison dart weilding dolphins, why on earth would they be left armed while at a training facility during a storm?

      You have obviously never tried to disarm a poison dart weilding dolphin :P

    4. Re:A serious post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And even if there *were* poison dart weilding dolphins, why on earth would they be left armed while at a training facility during a storm?

      Joke: This was the only way to force the navy onshore to help Katrina victims. They figured out that armed looters in New Orleans are lesser evil than armed dolphins.

  93. Worse than that! by biraneto2 · · Score: 1

    It's worse than that! They are under cover!

  94. There was an old lady ..... by taniwha · · Score: 1
    who swallowed a fly .......

    in that vein of course the only way to deal with dolphins with dart guns IS of course sharks with frickin' lasers

  95. Maybe catfish think YOU'RE ugly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...you insensitive clod.

  96. I'm out of touch.... by jpardey · · Score: 1

    I forgot what that stood for! Come to think of it, when do you capture the flag in counter-strike? I think you've been playing CS a little too little.

    --
    I have freaks! I did something right...
  97. Sharks with lazer-beams shooting from their eyes by TimeSpeak · · Score: 1

    It's just like my crazy neighbor always said "one day the government will have sharks fighting for them, ... yah!" "with lazer-beams... yah!" "that shoot from their eyes!..... yah!"

    --
    Am no fek Buddhist, but this is enlightenment.
  98. In unrelated news... by handmedowns · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hundreds of Tuna Fishermen have been killed from unknown toxins..

    Now THATS dolphin safe tuna.

    --
    The road between democracy and tyranny is paved with secrecy in the name of security.
  99. Yellow Tuna Journalism by Ranger · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Who the hell is this highly respected dolphin expert, Leo Sheridan? Google only turns up 19 hits with his name and the word dolphins. Never let facts get in the way of a whacky story. I wonder if the Guardian did it as a plant to see if gets picked up by slashdot. Way to go Slashdot. When did they put 9th graders in charge? First they keep posting dupes about space elevators, monorails, and zeppelins. How many times will this one get duped. I think the only thing duped here is the person who posted it to slashdot.

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
    1. Re:Yellow Tuna Journalism by Ranger · · Score: 1

      How could this possibly be flamebait? Did the person who mod this down actually read the Guardian article? Or are they modding it flamebait because I think the slashdot story moderators are acting like a bunch of 9th graders? How hard is it to do a Google search for the people mentioned in the article? Is Leo Sheridan, a respected dolphin researcher and accident investigator, a real person?

      --
      "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  100. Ro:swell by ILKO_deresolution · · Score: 0

    poisonous darts? trying to scare some people so they dont
    find somthing? hmmmmm I think someone said mine clearing.
    Whats the real deal?

    --
    I tip toe like rats on vouge runnways.
  101. Oh fuck It's Flipper! by MADCOWbeserk · · Score: 0

    and he has got a new attitude.. Revenge

    I retain all movie, novel, comic books and TV spinoffs

  102. As they left... by MADCOWbeserk · · Score: 5, Funny

    Somebody heard them say

    "So long and thanks for all the fish"

  103. All Hail King Snorky by E8086 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I welcome our new dolphin overloards, until we get hungry and eat them or they strangle themselves on 6pack can fasteners.

    All Hail King Snorky

    --
    F7 doesn't work, ignore spelling and grammar
  104. Laugh all you want, but ... by jackDuhRipper · · Score: 1
    this has potential for some *really* Bad Shi*t to happen: If some other nation - one with fewer good intentions than the US has with regard to these animals - gets their hands on them, who's to say there won't be a Killer Animal Training Arms Race. If that doesn't paint a clear enough picture, think of these four words: Napalm Dromedaries; Simian Tazers.

    Like my mother always said, "It's all fun and games until the government-trained killer aquatic mammals wind up in the hands of your country's enemies."

    (Man, that was pretty prescient of her ...)

    So long, and thanks for screwing up AvantSlash (again) with your CSS ...

    S

    1. Re:Laugh all you want, but ... by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1

      Don't see how that matters - assuming the animals are not trained to kill anyway, what's the advantage for "some other nation" to get their hands on them? I don't think there is a dolphin shortage, so they could just plainly catch some random dolphins and train them.

  105. Deja Vu by Now.Imperfect · · Score: 2, Funny

    Reminds me of "The Incredible Mr. Limpet" (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0058230/)

    Really though, this could be interesting...

  106. Look Out!!! by MADCOWbeserk · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It's giant dolphin with Rabies!

  107. Re:This just in... Mods on Tuna! by saskboy · · Score: 1

    I don't know what's funnier, the EEEEEEEEeeEEEEeee eeeEEE or the fact that you have a +5 Informative. Mods eating tuna?

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  108. Welcome by Pneuma+ROCKS · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome our new dart shooting killer dolphin overlords.

    --
    Favorite quote: &quot;
  109. They call him Flipper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone loves the king of the sea,
    ever so kind and gentle is he,
    tricks he will do when children appear,
    and how they laugh when he's near!
    But watch out evil doers, for he will
    spread havoc among you all doing
    wrong...

    They call him Flipper, Flipper, faster than lightning,
    no-one you see, is smarter than he,
    and we know Flipper, lives in a world full of wonder,
    flying there-under, under the sea!

    Look at the sky when rainbows appear,
    you can be sure, that Flipper is near,
    call him by name or less intellect,
    he'll give you a ride on his back!
    and then he'll rip your rib cage
    out through your back!

    We know our Flipper, Flipper, knows every answer,
    no-one can be, much smarter than he,
    and we know Flipper, lives in a world full of wonder,
    flying there-under, under the sea finding evil doers
    easier than 1-2-3.

    Many a night, way down in the deep,
    oysters make beds, so Flipper can sleep,
    happy and gay when he comes along,
    they all start singing this song!

    They call him Flipper, Flipper, faster than lightning,
    no-one you see, is smarter than he,
    and we know Flipper, lives in a world full of wonder,
    flying there-under, waiting to unleash his armagedon
    agains all evil doers!

    I wonder when the u.s. military will start training collies for covert operations?

  110. I for one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome... aww hell, you know the rest.

  111. Why doesn't anyone think this is sick? by Spirit+Of+Atlantis · · Score: 1

    I haven't read anyone writing in this thread one word about how sick this actually is.

    HELLO!
    Let's summarize here, so humans are born into this universe and found other species in their proximity...and SOMEHOW between being born and now found ethical justifications to train another species with no vote of it's own to KILL other beings for the very purposes of the human beings themselves??!!!!

    If i had a huge alarm right now with a _BIG RED FLASHING LIGHT_...i would certainly turn it on _RIGHT NOW_ !!!

    I know in WWII dogs were trained to carry explosives and sneak under tanks to detonate themselves under the tanks, to my opinion that's pretty much the same kind of thing as the above, so i know this isn't new, but that's _NOT_ the point, i just cannot fathom what this must say about human kind or at the very least about the people who justify this or cooporate with this.

    Suppose every race/species in the universe had a story and that story would start with being born into this universe, then humans would have at some point _NOT ONLY_ have a chapter of the fase they killed eachother(or other races), they'd _NOT ONLY_ have a chapter where they killed other species, they'd also have a chapter where they trained other species to kill "for them".

    This seems to me so much like a host race training a slave species to kill for them, while the slave species has no voice in this neither might it not know what it's doing, which the host species uses/exploits to it's very own advantage.
    If we not radically self-reflect here, be it on thinking, ideology, conduct, ethics etc etc, then there is no telling what chapter will be next.
    We're here in this(universe) with other species...to me this feels like breaking some highly critical cosmic law.
    Something you just _DO NOT DO_ !

    (Maybe one could compare it to advancing to another higher level of misconduct....as if the levels of the status quo weren't already bad enough.)

    While humans could have taken responsibility...it looks like it's going exactly the other way.
    I think we could praise ourselves extremely blissfully lucky if things turn out well with us after all, i'm not saying it would not turn out positively, but that point seems just so far away when reading something like this.

    1. Re:Why doesn't anyone think this is sick? by chudgoo · · Score: 1

      Probably because they see it as the lame attempt at humor that it most certainly is.

      I wouldn't worry too much about the 'cosmic' significance either...Animals often exploit a weakness in another animal to help it proliferate and in the process put its competitors at an evolutionary disadvantage (thereby killing them off)

    2. Re:Why doesn't anyone think this is sick? by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, it sounds appropriate.

      I, for one, welcome our new Dolphin overlords!

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    3. Re:Why doesn't anyone think this is sick? by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      I haven't read anyone writing in this thread one word about how sick this actually is.

      Maybe that's because many of us consider it about as sick as training HUMANS to kill other humans.

      I think it's weird that you think that these soldier's being dolphins is the worst part of it.
      You seem to have a strange sense of ethics.
      If it's okay to kill humans, why should only other humans do it?
      If it's not okay, then the whole other species thing is rather irrelevant.

      I know in WWII dogs were trained to carry explosives and sneak under tanks to detonate themselves under the tanks, to my opinion that's pretty much the same kind of thing as the above, so i know this isn't new, but that's _NOT_ the point

      "Not new" is really a severe understatement. Animals have been used in war for thousands of years. What makes this so different than riding your gallant steed into battle?

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    4. Re:Why doesn't anyone think this is sick? by Kjella · · Score: 1

      If it's okay to kill humans, why should only other humans do it?
      If it's not okay, then the whole other species thing is rather irrelevant.


      You miss the point. Humans are there by enlisting, by conscription, by choice or at the very least because it is "their" war. Enlisting animals is roughly as voluntary as the guerillas you read about that kidnap children, stick a gun in their hands and tell them to fight for them or get a bullet in the back. The dolphins have no choice nor could they understand it, they have never decleared war on anyone, they shouldn't have to have any part in our conflicts. So my problem with animals in combat is that we make the animals legitimate military targets others want to kill.

      "Not new" is really a severe understatement. Animals have been used in war for thousands of years. What makes this so different than riding your gallant steed into battle?

      Not much. And in fact, the most common way to bring down a cavalerist was to injure or kill his steed. Then again, I don't think maltreatment of animals was a big thing, or if anyone cared that they suffered. Or for that matter the treatment of civilians, prisoners of war and so on. Hell, even inanimate objects (historical monuments) have protection today if you play by the rules. I don't think many have a problem sacrificing animal lives to save human lives, just look at how little you value enemy lives compared to your own. But if the alternatives are as follows:

      a) Both use animals: 200 people and 20 dolphins dead on both sides
      b) Neither use animals: 200 people dead on both sides

      In that case, I don't think a ban on animals in warfare would be a bad thing. I don't think it is right for animals to suffer, get injured, maimed or die because people want to kill other people. Certainly not to be conscripted and put in harm's way on purpose. However, there are a lot of things that aren't right in war, so you pick the lesser evils. But I don't see that we need this evil anymore.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    5. Re:Why doesn't anyone think this is sick? by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      You miss the point. Humans are there by enlisting, by conscription, by choice or at the very least because it is "their" war.

      You throw the conscription in there, but you basically act as if you hadn't.
      You don't establish what makes it so ethically different for a person to be forced into military service and for a dolphin.

      I don't think many have a problem sacrificing animal lives to save human lives, just look at how little you value enemy lives compared to your own. But if the alternatives are as follows: a) Both use animals: 200 people and 20 dolphins dead on both sides b) Neither use animals: 200 people dead on both sides

      This reasoning really doesn't make sense.
      The whole reason they're using animals is so that they either:
      A) They don't need people for those jobs.
      B) The people are more effective in the jobs they're doing.
      c) They're jobs a person can't do.

      It's not like they're doing this for the hell of it.
      If it helps one side win faster then that would be "sacrificing animal lives to save human lives".

      As for getting both sides to agree not to use animals, why not get both sides to agree not to have a war in the first place?
      Even if you DO get both sides to agree, I believe the only time you wouldn't be trading human lives for animal lives would be if they war was unending, a la 1984.
      If there were actual goals to be accomplished, limited resources, etc, you're going to be able to get more done more quickly, which suggests that less people die.

      It's like weighing whether to have ambulances and suggesting that less people will get in accidents if medical attenion is less readily availible. The two things aren't really in direct proportion to each other.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
  112. April fools early? by chudgoo · · Score: 1

    Oh slashdot... the endless puns and stories about mine hunting and not one person has questioned the validity of this anonymous submitter's story.

    There are so many things wrong with this...

    Why were they kept "armed"? (surely they don't live day to day with "snout-guns" attached)
    Why were they not evacuated alongside all their other important assets?
    I can go on and on...but I'd rather address the issue at hand.

    First we have an urban legend about hotel room key-cards and now this steaming pile of unverified stupidity... With an audience in the millions you'd think the slashdot editors would take their jobs more seriously.

    Slightly OT : How many Al Queda suicide divers have you heard about? Is there any reason to believe that a dolphin would be able to neutralize a boat carrying armed terrorists? Where the fuck are our human units when/if such a bizarre situation arises?

    1. Re:April fools early? by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      Not Dolphins.

      Sea bass. With 'frick'en' laser beams on their head.

      Their kept in a medium sized room with a small rock ledge in the middle, and curiously inattentive guards.

      Sorry, this story has got me laughing like a nut. Everything about it is comic.

      Come to think of it, I want a killer dolphin. I could keep it in my pool, and feed it belligerent small children, and terrorists.

      Killer Dolphins of Doom = The American Dream!

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
  113. How irresponsible! by terpri · · Score: 1, Funny

    Won't somebody PLEASE think of the tuna??

  114. WE3 by Logan+Smith · · Score: 1

    I'm reminded of Grant Morrison's WE3 comic book trilogy.

    --
    Logan Smith
  115. How'd they do that? by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 4, Funny

    I don't know, but they can't be worse than the people they hire to work at airports currently. I mean, dolphins are supposed to be intelligent.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  116. most dangerous by willCode4Beer.com · · Score: 2, Funny

    and I was taught that the unloaded guns are the most dangerous ones.

    --
    ----- If communism is a system where the government owns business, what do you call a system where business owns govern
    1. Re:most dangerous by tylernt · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yup. "Don't you meddle with old unloaded firearms. They are the most deadly and unerring things that have ever been created by man. You don't have to take any pains at all with them. You don't have to have a rest. You don't have to have any sights on the gun. You don't have to aim, even. No, you just pick out a relative and bang away, and you are sure to get him. A youth who can't hit a cathedral at thirty yards with a Gatling gun in three-quarters of an hour can take up an old empty musket and bag his grandmother every time at a hundred." --Mark Twain

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
  117. Just send out the nuclear anti-dolphin pigeons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    to "neutralize" them by dropping their "payloads" on them.

    One way or the other the idiot Yanks are gonna get us all killed one day.

    1. Re:Just send out the nuclear anti-dolphin pigeons by mctaylor82 · · Score: 1

      One way or the other the idiot Yanks are gonna get us all killed one day.

      Sure, but that's not until a power surge releases our autonomous military robots (with lasers and everything).

  118. Obligatory Reply by xaosflux · · Score: 1

    I, for one, welcome our new dolphin overlords

    1. Re:Obligatory Reply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, for one, welcome our new dolphin overlords

      Awesome, yet another unoriginal idiot.

    2. Re:Obligatory Reply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh Sweet, yet another whiner on slashdot

  119. Overheard at the pentagon... by AngryDill · · Score: 1

    "The cetacean commandos have escaped!"
    "Quick... send in the Korean combat robots!

    --


    I'm Erwin Schrodinger and I approve of this message, and I do not approve of this message!
  120. Information on Marine Mammal Systems by typical · · Score: 5, Informative

    The US Navy refers to its dolphin units as "Marine Mammal Systems", and documents the purpose of each unit. Individual units are trained for mine hunting, force protection, and object recovery.

    Assuming that these dolphins are not part of a separate program, presumably the loose mammals are part of Marine Mammal System Mark VI. Note that the Navy Marine Mammal Program FAQ includes the following item:

    Does the Navy train its dolphins for offensive warfare, including attacks on ships and human swimmers or divers?
    No. The Navy does not now train, nor has it ever trained, its marine mammals to harm or injure humans in any fashion or to carry weapons to destroy ships. A popular movie in 1973 ("The Day of the Dolphin") and a number of charges and claims by animal rights organizations have resulted in theories and sometimes actual beliefs that Navy dolphins are assigned attack missions. This is absolutely false. Since dolphins cannot discern the difference between enemy and friendly vessels, or enemy and friendly divers and swimmers, it would not be wise to give that kind of decision authority to an animal. The animals are trained to detect, locate, and mark all mines or all swimmers in an area of interest or concern, and are not trained to distinguish between what we would refer to as good or bad. That decision is always left to humans.


    I find trace references to the fact that the former anti-swimmer system (the Shallow Water Intruder Detection System) was supplanted by something new involving dolphins. In the old system, a sea lion would swim up to an unknown frogman with an open-jawed clamp attached to a line attached to its nose, ram into the frogman, and then signal the handler -- the frogman would essentially become "handcuffed" to the line, easy to reel in.

    --
    Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
    1. Re:Information on Marine Mammal Systems by Dwonis · · Score: 4, Interesting
      That hardly says much. Consider the same thing, with a few words replaced:
      Does the Army use its land mines for offensive warfare?
      No. ... Since land mines cannot discern the difference between enemy and friendly vehicles, or enemy and friendly personnel, it would not be wise to give that kind of decision authority to a machine. ... That decision is always left to humans.
    2. Re:Information on Marine Mammal Systems by JRIsidore · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If there existed mines that can move around freely and towards distant targets you would have a point here. I am not aware that such mines exist. They usually sit in the dirt and wait for someone to trip on them. If you are the one who deployed them you know where they are and are not likely to be the one that activates them.
      Not that I welcome the Navy using mammals but you cannot really compare them to mines.

      --
      :w!q
    3. Re:Information on Marine Mammal Systems by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      You should read The loaded dog By Henry Lawson.

    4. Re:Information on Marine Mammal Systems by tj.parisi · · Score: 1

      Worth noting that the US Military doesn't use landmines either...

    5. Re:Information on Marine Mammal Systems by Ours · · Score: 1

      That's odd. I remember watching a documentary where they show a dolphin placing a mine on a ship during training. Sure they can't distinguish friend from foe but attack dogs have the same problem. The trainers tell them who to go for.

      --
      "You superiour intellect is no match for our puny weapons" - The Simpsons
    6. Re:Information on Marine Mammal Systems by Dwonis · · Score: 1
      Do you have any evidence of that? Various sources (such as this one) seem to suggest that the U.S. still uses land mines:
      The use of non-self-destructing antipersonnel mines is permissible until 2010 and then only in Korea. The use of non-self-destructing antivehicle mines globally will be allowed until 2010.
      ...
      The United States last acknowledged using antipersonnel mines in 1991 in Kuwait and Iraq, scattering 117,634 self-destructing/self-deactivating landmines mostly from airplanes.
    7. Re:Information on Marine Mammal Systems by Dwonis · · Score: 1

      My point applies regardless. The FAQ essentially says that "we allow only humans to give specific authorization to kill people, because only humans can determine the difference between friend and foe", but the US's use of land mines (which kill friend and foe indiscriminately, even long after a battle) contradicts this principle.

    8. Re:Information on Marine Mammal Systems by hobbesx · · Score: 1
      The frogman would essentially become "handcuffed" to the line, easy to reel in


      In the military train of thought, this would be properly classified as 'object recovery'.

      --
      This rating is Unfair ( ) ( ) Fair (*) Funny
      Sigh... If only. Modding would be so much more fun.
    9. Re:Information on Marine Mammal Systems by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      but the US's use of land mines (which kill friend and foe indiscriminately, even long after a battle) contradicts this principle.

      But they don't HAVE a use of landmines. The only remaining landmines are left in place from the still-inconclusive Korean war. The USA on principle refuses to employ landmines in general.

    10. Re:Information on Marine Mammal Systems by milette · · Score: 1

      US Military credo, "Kill 'em all -- let god sort 'em out."

    11. Re:Information on Marine Mammal Systems by EatAtJoes · · Score: 1

      But they don't HAVE a use of landmines. The only remaining landmines are left in place from the still-inconclusive Korean war. The USA on principle refuses to employ landmines in general.

      [bzzzzzzzt] WRONG.

      "U.S. commanders constantly had to reassure their troops that antipersonnel mines, when properly employed, could be an asset in the field. But faced with the reality that everything from dead bodies to their own discarded ration containers might be mined, some U.S. troops even refused to use command detonated Claymore mines. Their fears were apparently well-grounded. In December 1969 the Mine Warfare Center warned that "a review of casualty reports reveals an alarming number of incidents involving U.S. troops being injured by the untimely detonations of M18A1 Claymores or the blasting caps." (http://www.hrw.org/reports/1997/gen1/General-03.h tm)

      Most of the mine injuries suffered by US troops were caused by US mines being lifted and re-placed by the Viet Cong.

    12. Re:Information on Marine Mammal Systems by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      In December 1969

      [Bzzzzt] IRRELEVANT.

      Notice that my post was in present tense? The Army of 1969 is not the same as 2005. They don't spray Agent Orange, they don't draft high-school students, and they don't plant landmines outside of Korea. That's all ancient history. Indeed, part of the reason the US Army doesn't use landmines is the experience of the Vietnam conflict showed they were too dangerous to be worthwhile.

      (They do use timed aerial bombs, which sometimes can be confused with a landmine if the fusing is defective, but they're still different things)

  121. I remember a show I watched about military dolphin by Wengero · · Score: 1

    it was a show on the discovery channel showing off how u.s. was training dolphins for military purposes, attaching daggers to there heads and letting the dolphins go do there job. But they released it wouldnt work very good because after the years(i think it was years) it took to train the dolphin to hunt people the dolphin wasnt reusable. After the dolphin saw the damaged it cause with the blood and the pain it would swim off and would never do it again. on a side note: OH CRAP WE BETTER GET THOSE DOLPHINS OUT THE OCEAN AND BACK INTO THERE TANKS OR ELSE THEY COULD BE FREE.

  122. Dear Hollywood by SoVi3t · · Score: 1

    I am so writing a script for this right now!

    --
    Defender of Microsoft and Communism!!!
  123. ...or we could just go to the page in question by HBI · · Score: 5, Informative

    And discover the following:

    Does the Navy train its dolphins for offensive warfare, including attacks on ships and human swimmers or divers?
    No. The Navy does not now train, nor has it ever trained, its marine mammals to harm or injure humans in any fashion or to carry weapons to destroy ships. A popular movie in 1973 ("The Day of the Dolphin") and a number of charges and claims by animal rights organizations have resulted in theories and sometimes actual beliefs that Navy dolphins are assigned attack missions. This is absolutely false. Since dolphins cannot discern the difference between enemy and friendly vessels, or enemy and friendly divers and swimmers, it would not be wise to give that kind of decision authority to an animal. The animals are trained to detect, locate, and mark all mines or all swimmers in an area of interest or concern, and are not trained to distinguish between what we would refer to as good or bad. That decision is always left to humans.

    Does the Navy ask the dolphins and sea lions to do dangerous things?
    The dolphins locate and mark the location of sea mines which are designed to be set off by large ships, not aquatic animals. In the swimmer detection program, dolphins and sea lions move so quickly and with such accuracy that human swimmers in dark or murky waters are located and marked before they know what has happened. Once the marking has been completed, the animals are removed from the area before mines are disarmed or swimmers are apprehended by trained security forces. Marine mammals are actually in more danger from sharks, and wild marine mammals are put in much more danger by people who feed them (which is why it is illegal).

    Why have there been so many rumors about the NMMP over the years?
    Several decades of classification of the program's true missions of mine-hunting and swimmer defense, led to media speculation and animal activist charges of dolphins used as offensive weapons, speculation and charges that could not be countered with facts due to that classification. Additionally, fantasy is often times more interesting than reality. With declassification of the missions of the program in the early 1990s, the Navy has repeatedly and openly discussed those missions, but rumors are not easily forgotten, and there are those who continue to actively promote them.

    In response to charges that the program abused the animals, the presidentially appointed Marine Mammal Commission investigated the program in 1988 and 1990. The Commission reported that the allegations were not only false, but that the Navy's care of its marine mammals was "exemplary."


    Then, of course, we'd realize this guy was a kook, and that Slashdot is recycling stories that Art Bell wouldn't cover. Certainly makes you think twice about the journalistic integrity of the Guardian, though.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    1. Re:...or we could just go to the page in question by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Since dolphins cannot discern the difference between enemy and friendly vessels, or enemy and friendly divers and swimmers, it would not be wise to give that kind of decision authority to an animal.

      Just how did they find that information out?

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
  124. Mother Nature called. She's pissed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess Mother Nature couldn't get all the Godless Heathens with the 2 hurricanes she sent, so now on to Plan B...Killer Dolphins! That'll teach those evil, alcohol consuming, stripper watching, heathens down south!

  125. Liars by cyrix · · Score: 1

    So long and thanks for all the fish? Yeah, now they're armed... They'll want ALL the fish now.

  126. Obligatory Red Alert 2 Reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russie, they use Giant Squids, not Dolphins.

  127. Quick! by kop · · Score: 1

    Release the mad penguin!

  128. Don't fear the penguins. by sveskemus · · Score: 1

    Slashdot: Don't fear the penguins. Fear the friggin' dolphins!

    1. Re:Don't fear the penguins. by spepper · · Score: 1

      ....with LASER BEAMS attached to their FRIGGIN' HEADS! Mini ME, how many times have I told you-- STOP HUMPING THE GIANT LASER!

  129. Mod Parent UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod this up. S/he is absolutely right. Not to mention the moral aspect of using an endangered species (which are also particularly cute).

  130. Obviously... by mpaque · · Score: 1

    A viral marketing scheme for the SciFi Channel's next big Saturday Night Epic. What with the dolphin special effects budget, though, they might not be able to hire Bruce "The Chin" Campbell. Perhaps they can get Austin Jordan, the amazing actor from "Mansquito." Or not...

    Seriously, though, did anyone bother to check out Leo Sheridan? This investigator is noteworthy for his declaring that any dead dolphins, whether on a Mediterranean beach, in San Diego, or the Gulf of Mexico, were killed to cover up the existence of a secret government program. In one case he even claimed the dolphins were deserters and were killed by explosive collars.

    Might I suggest that perhaps he needs to purchase a few of these fine items to protect himself: http://www.lessemf.com/personal.html

    Note: 'Day of the Dolphin,' (1974) starring George C. Scott, is not a documentary.

    1. Re:Obviously... by spepper · · Score: 1

      yes-- next, types like Sheridan and Michael Moore etc. will be claiming that those dolphins were in fact RESPONSIBLE for the hurricanes, having been trained PERSONALLY by George W Bush -- US President by day, dolphin global-warming terrorist trainer by night!

  131. Armed? Really? by dtfinch · · Score: 1

    It seems unlikely that anyone would train dolphins with live ammo.

  132. This calls for by future+assassin · · Score: 1

    I welcome our new Dolphin overlods.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  133. Flipper on the loose scuba divers killed by What+me+a+Coward · · Score: 1

    Scuba divers killed by rouge dolphin with dart gun story at eleven. :P

    --
    Coward? Coward! Thems fighten words!!
    1. Re: Flipper on the loose scuba divers killed by oreilco · · Score: 1

      Rouge ? How stylish !

  134. From a pedantic Aussie by timboc007 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Chaos reigned in the administration today as it received a communication from "Skippy", a Navy-trained bottlenose dolphin who was liberated from his holding tank along with 35 other dolphins when Hurricane Katrina struck.

    Hmm... somebody is having trouble keeping their various cute and lovable kid's show characters separate...

    For the record

    • Skippy = Kangaroo from Australian TV show of the same name
    • Flipper = Dolphin from Australian TV show of the same name

    Don't mean to troll, I'm just sayin'

  135. terrible jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My cod! Reading all those lame puns has given me a terrible haddock.

  136. Not The First Global Dolphin Threat by simple+mind · · Score: 1

    Remember the opposable thumbs scare from five years ago?

  137. Article in the Wrong Topic by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Shouldn't poison dart tipped dolphins be under Hardware Hacking with the other case mods?

  138. Quit horsing around! by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dolphins are mammals, not fish. If you're going to monkey around with species-related puns, at least stick to the same class of vertebrates. This has been the giant elephant in the room throughout this thread.

    1. Re:Quit horsing around! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ross?... Ross Geller, is that you?
      Spoilsport

    2. Re:Quit horsing around! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Maybe they were sea-related puns, instead of species-related ones.

      And before criticizing someone having a whale of a time, first take the plankton out of thy own eye.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  139. A message from the NRA by commodoresloat · · Score: 5, Funny
    Apparently, these dolphins swim around fully armed, 24-7!

    You know what they say; an armed society is a polite society. Have you heard of a single dolphin-on-dolphin crime using a toxic dartgun that occurred when both dolphin were armed?

    I didn't think so.

    1. Re:A message from the NRA by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      Odd, dolphins actually help each other to have sex. A couple and one to keep them from coming apart.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    2. Re:A message from the NRA by Cervantes · · Score: 1

      No, we just haven't heard of any white dolphin-on-dolphin crime. The coloured dolphin crime only gets reported in the news when we have to scare the white dolphins back into line.

      --
      If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
  140. GPS or other tracking devices by tod_miller · · Score: 1

    Since this was announced now, I am guessing the scurry to find them using the safety methods (said with some sarcasm here) has come up with nothing.

    Now if someone gets hit, it won't be 'oh yes, were are sorry, we let us killer dolphins into the wild' but, you were swimming there, when we told you there were killer dolphins.

    I can also see the denied purchase request for 20 tracking beacons hurridly being found and burned.

    In other news, an elite squardron of fencing swordfish and navy seals (like, real seals) were also missing.

    To confirm you're not a script,
    please type the word in this image: yeoman

    random letters - if you are visually impaired, please email us at pater@slashdot.org

    --
    #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
  141. Obligatory... by 1tsm3 · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome the Killer Dolphin overlords!

    Pzzaaappt!! What was that sting like feelin.... Thud!

    --
    -ItsME
  142. New Urban Legend by Wassini · · Score: 0

    Whether they catch all of the dolphins or not this is going to start a new Urban Legend.

    --
    Lars Bo Wassini
  143. vital they are caught quickly by xeno · · Score: 1

    "Those who have studied the controversial use of dolphins in the U.S. defence programme claim it is vital they are caught quickly

    Or what?

    They're gonna go back to the sea, tell their brethren about what worthless abusive slobs we are, teach them some new tool-using concepts, and launch a revolution? Absurd, yes, but if we're still training animals to do our military dirty work these days, with exotic weapons no less -- and most of our military actions are motivated by unfathomable political stupidity and testosterone-poisoning -- we've all richly earned such an obtuse end.

    I say more power to 'em, goddamit. Next time you see me rowing out and dumping bags full of rubber-handled tools (easy to grip w/teeth), supplies, and beer into the ocean, you'll know what I'm up to.

    J

    --
    I think not...(*poof*)
  144. This is *definitely* a hunter weapon by AndrewHowe · · Score: 1

    I'm rolling.

  145. Boy am I glad I thought about this by GauteL · · Score: 1

    .. before sending in a "What is so f****** funny about this? It is dangerous!" post.

  146. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our new toxic dart dolphin overlords!

  147. Political moderators... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't get how this is moderated. The line he comments on is part of the story. You know ... the "topic"... I'm not quite sure how a comment on the topic could be off topic?

    1. Re:Political moderators... by Bastian · · Score: 1

      Simple. Moderation rule number 1: If you disagree, mod down. If you can't think of a good reason for the public, mod at random. If you can't think of a good reason but you don't want people to know, mod -1(Overrated).

      I get modded down for speaking my mind all the time. It's really not surprising anymore.

  148. The real question... by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...is whether the Navy fed them or let them hunt for food. If they fed them every day, their likelihood of surviving in the Gulf diminishes rapidly. If, on the other hand, they were taught to hunt for food, they could potentially pose a hazard. We don't have to worry too much about fishermen getting poked, as all of the water around there is now contaminated and shouldn't be used for fishing anyway.

  149. Pictures Of the dolphins by kafros · · Score: 1

    Top Secret pictures of the Navy Dolphins http://www.planetunreal.com/images.asp?/images/scr eens/uc_083105_2.jpg Looks scary

  150. Holey Fish Story by sciop101 · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Get a Grip on Substance.

    The Guardian story is full of unnamed third party references. "received intelligence from sources close to the US government's marine fisheries service."

    Leo Sheridan did not even say where the dolphins were trained.

    --
    The only thing new in this world is the history that you don't know.[Harry Truman]
  151. I for one... by WarMonkey · · Score: 0

    WELCOME our new cetacean overlords.

    --
    -- I could tell right away that she was impressed with my HUGE Slashdot Karma.
  152. Terrorists? by varjag · · Score: 1

    The U.S. Atlantic bottlenose dolphins have apparently been taught to shoot terrorists attacking military vessels.

    Sorry, but someone attacking a military target is combatant, saboteur if you like. The point of terrorism is to spread fear among general population in order to achieve certain goal.

    A military vessel is a fair target in a conflict. Making an attempt on servicemen of your country doesn't imply that the foe is a terrorist, no matter how you hate it. That's what soldiers have been doing for millenia now.

    --
    Lisp is the Tengwar of programming languages.
  153. Obligatory Adams by shoptroll · · Score: 1

    So long and thanks for all the fish!

    --
    Insert Sig Here
  154. Not quite by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 1

    Actually, the worst thing a dolphin could likely do would be to kill you by stoving your chest in or fracturing your skull or ribs. You'd likely then either die from your injuries or drown.

    The dolphin's nose is extremely hard, and (IIRC) is its primary weapon. Dolphins have been known to fight off even larger sharks, and in any confrontation with a human they could easily dive out of reach and stage repeated charges, charging at you from below (which really doesn't bear thinking about) - remember, they can get up enough speed to lift their entire bodies may metres clear out of the water (up to 21mph), and that's leaving aside the bone-crushing amount of force they could generate simply by slapping you with their tail. They also tend to hunt in packs, and are intelligent enough to tactically herd and corral their prey first to make killing them easier.

    So don't tell me a wimpy little out-of-his-depth naked ape thrashing around on the surface would be anything but fishfood to a highly-trained troop of 4-metre long 650kg sleek grey killing machines that can take out a great white shark...

    As Terry Pratchett so presciently pointed out, never trust an animal that smiles all the time. It's up to something... ;-)

    --
    Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
  155. aw come on, you can do better than that by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Atlantis dolphins release YOU!

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  156. you know where they are by wiredog · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Don't count on it.

  157. Where is Aquaman when we need him? by Galapas · · Score: 2, Informative

    For once in his life he could have been useful.

        -G

    1. Re:Where is Aquaman when we need him? by spepper · · Score: 1

      ....he was too busy "being GAY", and hanging out in Key Largo! Not to mention that "riding sea horses".... IS JUST WRONG!

  158. Oblig. Austin Powers quote by MirrororriM · · Score: 1
    Dr Evil: You know, I have one simple request. And that is to have sharks with frickin' laser beams attached to their heads! Now evidently my cycloptic colleague informs me that that cannot be done. Ah, would you remind me what I pay you people for, honestly? Throw me a bone here! What do we have?

    Number Two: Sea Bass.

    Dr. Evil: [pause] Right.

    Number Two: They're mutated sea bass.

    Dr. Evil: Are they ill tempered?

    Number Two: Absolutely.

    Dr. Evil: Oh well, that's a start.

    Thank you, I'll be here all day...

    --
    Content Management System: A pretentious way of saying "text editor."
    1. Re:Oblig. Austin Powers quote by PhoenixPath · · Score: 1

      Who are you, and what have you done to Trip Master Monkey!

  159. They have made their first hit by AeiwiMaster · · Score: 1

    Here is a story about how they distracted a lady and emptied her purse.

  160. So Long, and ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for all the Fish!

  161. Whew! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least this doesn't happen in Russia. Wouldn't want Giant Squid on the loose too!

  162. Saw them at WalMart by sycodon · · Score: 1

    Hey,

    I saw these guys knocking over a Walmart during the looting! They were cleaning out the Sardine supply.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  163. Dolphins Evolve Opposable Thumbs! by elenaran · · Score: 1
  164. Laser Dolphin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heh, if anyone is interested in dolphins using lasers, check out my shareware game "Laser Dolphin": http://www.dingogames.com/dolphin ... I never expected it to become a reality :-0

  165. Free Willy 3: Die Hard by Stormcrow309 · · Score: 1

    Willy is back, trained, and pissed.

    --

    In God we trust, all others require data.

  166. Now with lasers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stage 1: dolphins with toxic dart guns
    Stage 2: sharks with lasers

    Doesn't it make you proud to be an American.

  167. Thats awesome. by jmpnz · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome our new cetacean overlords.

  168. We are worried about what?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OMFG are you seriously worried about dolphins let loose with strap-ons?? Sounds like horrible porn, not the navy... oh, wait... I can think of tons of horrible porn plot lines involving the navy.

  169. Well.. by jav1231 · · Score: 1

    We can only hope, being the smartest mammals on the planet, that they can tell the good guys from the bad guys.
    I found it interesting with all of the "science" about how smart dolphins are to find that they're also quite capable of evil. I mean, dolphin lovers like to talk about how smart and how "humane" they are and if we would be more like them we'd all live in this utopia. I thought this was an interesting take until I saw the Discovery Channel show about how young male dolphins gang up and kidnap and rape female dolphins.

  170. I for one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    welcome our new aquatic overlords

  171. other explanation? by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 1
    Whether Sheridan is a crackpot or not, you have entirely dismissed the most compelling piece of evidence, questioned for chrissake, the DATE he cites, and refuted his statements with nothing but some silly ad hominem about aliens.

    A bunch of dolphins, all with puncture wounds on thier necks in the exact same place, consistent with a small explosive detonation. That sure sounds fishy to me. Considering that the military has been working with dolphins for quite some time now... Whether his information regarding that has any merit at all, the military does acknowledge training dolphins... I can't think of any other explanation other than an aborted U.S. military project.

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
  172. If you can read this, please help by DavesWorld334 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The last few weeks have been hellish. My house in New Orleans flooded out, my TV was stolen by looters, my food and water by the mayor's thugs, and now there's a bunch of dolphins in my living room making me type for them. If there are any search geniuses out there, please help me find the current whereabouts of Flipper, as the lasers on their heads are starting to get unnerving. They promised to fry me if I can't find their god ... er ... Flipper.

    Please help.

  173. Jack the Flipper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I smell a red herring

  174. Re: In the origianl version... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flipper shoots first !!!

  175. I have to by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    WTF! Happened to "Thanks for all the fish?"

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  176. Dr. Evil would be so upset by amichalo · · Score: 1
    You know, I have one simple request. And that is to have sharks with frickin' laser beams attached to their heads! Now evidently my cycloptic colleague informs me that that cannot be done. Ah, would you remind me what I pay you people for, honestly? Throw me a bone here! What do we have?


    Even years after his plee, the government hasn't hit the proverbial nail on the head yet.
    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
  177. OT: Your .sig by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 0

    "If communism is a system where the government owns business, what do you call a system where business owns govern"

    You're referring to fascism , "the merger of state and corporate power" (according to Mussolini, its first biggest booster).

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:OT: Your .sig by mc6809e · · Score: 3, Informative

      "If communism is a system where the government owns business, what do you call a system where business owns govern"

      You're referring to fascism , "the merger of state and corporate power" (according to Mussolini, its first biggest booster).


      "Corporate" doesn't mean what you think it means in this context.

      Wikipedia gives a good history of corporatism.

      "Under Fascism in Italy, business owners, employees, trades-people, professionals, and other economic classes were organized into 22 guilds, or associations, known as "corporations" according to their industries, and these groups were given representation in a legislative body known as the Camera dei Fasci e delle Corporazioni."

      So you see, "the merger of state and corporate power" doesn't just mean businesses. Today such a system might include corporations such as the AFL/CIO and other labor unions. Yes, they are corporations, too.

      And business never "owned" government under Fascism. Fascism is primarily about putting the state above the individual, indeed above everything, include businesses.

      Doctrine of Fascism

      "The corporate State considers that private enterprise in the sphere of production is the most effective and usefu [sic] [typo-should be: useful] instrument in the interest of the nation. In view of the fact that private organisation of production is a function of national concern, the organiser of the enterprise is responsible to the State for the direction given to production.
      State intervention in economic production arises only when private initiative is lacking or insufficient, or when the political interests of the State are involved. This intervention may take the form of control, assistance or direct management. (pp. 135-136) "

      Benito Mussolini, 1935, Fascism: Doctrine and Institutions, Rome: 'Ardita' Publishers.

    2. Re:OT: Your .sig by willCode4Beer.com · · Score: 1

      Dude, I've just finished reading that and the linked list from it. (twice)
      You have just blown my mind and scared the hell out of me.

      You know, if only a couple of things in that list of 14 characteristics, I'd not worry. But, when I am seeing all of them around us daily... just creepy, very creepy

      --
      ----- If communism is a system where the government owns business, what do you call a system where business owns govern
    3. Re:OT: Your .sig by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 0

      Yes, and in the US, it's patriotic to consume, to keep "the economy" going. Are you comfortable with how proud Mussolini would be with our corporatist government? Even though we don't have many labor corporations, just unions (which work differently), it's "the merger of state and corporate power". It's certainly not "of, by and for the people".

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    4. Re:OT: Your .sig by lgw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just remember that the list was made by someone who wanted to prove that America was fascist, and set out to find points of commonality, however tenuous. As evidenced by conspiracy theories, you can draw connections between anything if you try hard enough.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    5. Re:OT: Your .sig by willCode4Beer.com · · Score: 1

      I guess what made the article stand out is the multitude of events.
      (for the record, I know almost nothing of fascism, and my sig is an honest question to 'hopefully' lead me to enlightenment. I had never even thought fascism could be the answer. Its a sign of my ignorance in this area that I hope to eliminate)
      Some things that make me worry (and ring with the article linked).
      - detaining POW's after the conflict has ended
      - detaining anybody without charges or trial
      - having the FBI look for 'criminal obsenity'
      - DNA database
      - preemptive strikes
      - science being replaced with religion in the classroom
      - ever-growing military spending (who is *really* going to invade us?)
      - constant fear-mongering of the terrorist boogeyman instead of preparing for common disasters
      - DMCA
      - USA PATRIOT act
      - rampant corruption
      - constant degredation of the courts with the term "judicial activism"

      Before reading that article, I saw these things as just wacked. As for conspiracies, I really don't think the government is organised enough or has people smart enough to pull em off (based on my observations). However, sometimes people get caught-up in a course of events that leads them to places they never expected to go (Nazi Germany is the best example of this). Another commonality that I'll throw out. I'm willing to bet that all of the guys leading their countries into fascism probably thought they were doing the best thing for their people (seems most also had the *consent* of the populace too, from some quick googling). I really hope we aren't going this way but, everytime I turn on the news, things look a little bit worse.

      Show me there's nothing to worry about, and I'll shut up.

      And before anybody tries to cast me as some wacko liberal, I should make clear, I was a registered Republican until Bush beat McCain in the primaries. I was so disgusted that I switched to the Libertarian party. I also served in the US Army as an Airborne Combat Engineer (for the lay person, this means jumping out of a C-130 aircraft from 800ft with 80lbs of explosives in your rucksack).

      --
      ----- If communism is a system where the government owns business, what do you call a system where business owns govern
    6. Re:OT: Your .sig by mc6809e · · Score: 1

      Yes, and in the US, it's patriotic to consume, to keep "the economy" going. Are you comfortable with how proud Mussolini would be with our corporatist government?

      He would probably be unhappy with how business don't seem to serve society/state enough. Remember that their purpose isn't to serve the owners ultimately. It's to serve the state, according to Mussolini, at least. He would no doubt exercise what he thought was the state's option to directly administer many industries. All in the "pubic's interest", of course. Interestingly, many on the left would make the same complaint about business and offer the same "solution".

      Even though we don't have many labor corporations, just unions (which work differently), it's "the merger of state and corporate power". It's certainly not "of, by and for the people".

      All unions except informal ones are genuine corporations. They have bylaws and charters and all those things that go along with being a corporation.

      And while we don't have a separate legislative body for all those corporations that way fascist Italy did, we do have lobbyists in Washington exercising influence. That includes business corporations, but also all those other corporations, like the NEA, AARP, Sierra Club, etc.

    7. Re:OT: Your .sig by willCode4Beer.com · · Score: 1

      This is the first time I've heard anyone make fascism look attractive.
      Maybe I need to break out of my idiot savant mode and study some political science.

      --
      ----- If communism is a system where the government owns business, what do you call a system where business owns govern
    8. Re:OT: Your .sig by mc6809e · · Score: 2

      This is the first time I've heard anyone make fascism look attractive.
      Maybe I need to break out of my idiot savant mode and study some political science.


      It's not surprising that fascism might look attractive. Dictators don't just come to power with zero support. There have to be enough people to believe in and be attracted to the philosophy. It has to look good for people to accept it. Hitler and Mussolini had plenty of popular support.

      What's interesting is how time and again this idea of placing society always before the individual ends with dictatorship. We have our intuitions about how the state can be used to create a utopian society, and these intuitions turn out to be mostly wrong in practice.

    9. Re:OT: Your .sig by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      What's interesting is how time and again this idea of placing society always before the individual ends with dictatorship. We have our intuitions about how the state can be used to create a utopian society, and these intuitions turn out to be mostly wrong in practice.

      That's why I think the real answer is to use the state to put individual needs above the society instead. But what you end up doing that way is each house, neighborhood, city, county, and state being allowed to form their own armies and control local comerce. You might not have to compete- but you do have to provide a useful product if you're going to survive. And becoming rich would be impossible.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    10. Re:OT: Your .sig by Atryn · · Score: 1

      I agree with a lot of your thoughts. I started off (in my youth?) as more of a conspiracy theorist, but as time has moved on its become clear that almost any organization large enough (government or business) to be accused of conspiracy theories of any threat are also too disorganized at an individual level to pull them off. Instead it seems to always be well intentioned people whose actions, collectively, lead to an unfortunate and unthought-of end...

      The real question is whether that end is unpredictable given the steps along the way. If it is predictable, can it be identified and exposed significantly enough and early enough to change course? One would hope that the United States has this capability through its ideals of free speech, open forums and a free press. But sometimes even those get eaten away at...

      --
      Come play Moral Decay!
    11. Re:OT: Your .sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Still wagging that tiny dick of yours around in deluded ignorance, eh, Doc?

      Do you ever get tired of being completely, absolutely and utterly wrong every single second of your useless life?

    12. Re:OT: Your .sig by lgw · · Score: 1

      There's no doubt that corporate control of government, if left unchecked, will lead to no good. But it will be something different from fascism. Closer to mercantilism (the British war *for* drugs is humorous in hindsight). Despite the whinings of some attention-whores, America is a *long* way from the totalitarianism implied by fascism.

      It also helps to remember that we had a far more corporately-corrupt govenment 100 or so years ago, and we recovered from that. The seventeenth amendment
      was a significant structural change, but it did fix the problem for many decased (and was a *much* better idea than the sixteenth or eighteenth amendments!).

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    13. Re:OT: Your .sig by willCode4Beer.com · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, sounds a lot like Objectivism.
      I read alot of Ayn Rand in my younger days (probably what lead me to being a libertarian). And the ideas seem to follow this line. Everyone acting in their own interests create the result of a better life for all. You are only responsible to yourself.
      The problem with this is that some things (national intersate system) can be too big for any individual to do, and possibly extremely difficult to organize a collection of people to do. Another problem is there may not be sufficient motivation to ensure the poor are educated.
      The plus side is when a disaster like Hurricane Katrina comes by, you don't have people relying on an agency like FEMA, people are prepared themselves.
      ($20 inflatable boat plus $80 of canned food and bottled water could keep someone going for over a month in a flood zone)

      I think what we need is for people to have spirit of objectivism/libertarianism in that they strive to be self reliant and independent while maintaining a society that ensures that everyone is able to start adulthood with a minimum level of preparation and that there is some kind of safety net to prevent productive people from falling. Of course, there is no way to establish a government like this because, peoples attitudes are personal options (for now anyway).
      One thing that would greatly help would be to reduce the number of corporations, and make it very difficult to form one. Also, make it easier to start a business. Limiting the liability of decision makers is dangerous. In a sole-proprietership, or a partnership, people are liable for their decisions. This encourages greater responsibility (a good thing in my mind).

      --
      ----- If communism is a system where the government owns business, what do you call a system where business owns govern
    14. Re:OT: Your .sig by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, sounds a lot like Objectivism.

      The difference between distributism and objectivism is this: There's no room for selfishness in a distributist system. Because each artisan in each town has a *right* to the customers they know, as well as a right to ask the town council to levee tariffs to protect that right, markets in a distributist system are naturally limited.

      The problem with this is that some things (national intersate system) can be too big for any individual to do, and possibly extremely difficult to organize a collection of people to do.

      Under a distributist system, such large organizations become completely unneccessary. There's no need to move large amounts of goods or armament around the country- there are local producers to provide those needs. There's no need to move money around the nation or even have a combined national currency; each town would print it's own, and be responsible for their own welfare. Distributists were the only lefties to resist the Social Security system- they knew it was neccessary under capitalism, but they said that it was immoral in the extreme for it to be neccessary at all.

      The plus side is when a disaster like Hurricane Katrina comes by, you don't have people relying on an agency like FEMA, people are prepared themselves. ($20 inflatable boat plus $80 of canned food and bottled water could keep someone going for over a month in a flood zone)

      It's actually even better than that- within WALKING distance of the edge of the flood zone is a guy who makes the rubber rafts in his basement. And another one who's running a wood burning still to create clean water (he normally manfactures booze). And a third farmer selling the produce of his fields- or giving it away because he knows people who are in need.

      I think what we need is for people to have spirit of objectivism/libertarianism in that they strive to be self reliant and independent while maintaining a society that ensures that everyone is able to start adulthood with a minimum level of preparation and that there is some kind of safety net to prevent productive people from falling. Of course, there is no way to establish a government like this because, peoples attitudes are personal options (for now anyway).

      True enough- though a smart demagogue could take advantage of the three main facts that are now converging to make distributism possible in the United States: 1. The end of cheap energy. 2. The lack of central government services. 3. The fact that distributism is Roman Catholic and that Roman Catholics have a 25% plurality in the United States now- a voting block 62 million strong.

      I think the key to taking advantage of that last is explaining it both in terms of economic science and in terms of Church Teaching- you'd still lose the Traditionalists on one side and the anti-Catholics on the other, but in a three way race you'd probably still come out ahead.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  178. War doesn't take rain checks by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    I know the military can be stupid sometimes, but surely not stupid enough to have their trained killer dolphins armed up during an incoming major hurricane?

    Since no one would ever attack under the cover of hurricane?
    It's not like the place is deserted from the evacuation, or that the military personnel is busy running around with sandbags and with crossing-guard duty, or anything.

    If you're willing to strap poisoned darts on dolphins, and train them to kill. You're probably willing to do it in any weather. Hell, it's not like they'd only train the killer-dart dolphin attack squad to work on perfect sunny days.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  179. You're right. by jd · · Score: 1

    That would be as stupid as handing Haliburton a no-compete contract to rebuild New Orleans, after the over-priced, under-performing fiascos they've been involved with in Iraq. Oh. they did.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  180. "Experts"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which "Experts"?

    Would these be the Navy's experts? The marine biologists the Navy consulted with to train the dolphins? Or Joe Bob with a degree from UFO University in Area 51?

    And the statement that dolphins wouldn't be able to tell friend from foe is true. Therefore, arming them would be contraindicated. So I don't know what "documentaries" people are watching where the "classified" guns are shown and described...the only one that comes to mind is by that noted 60s researcher Austin Powers. That mentioned sharks with "lasers." I assume dolphins could therefore be outfitted with these "lasers," too.

    "Gee, we just blew up a dolphin that cost a million dollars to train, and he took out one of our SEALs who cost five million to train, and the enemy saw the explosion and the billion dollar mission is scrubbed! It worked!"

    Grow up, fucktards.

  181. Dolohin Looters by randyflood · · Score: 2, Funny


    Perhaps the Dolphins were just defending their fish supply from the other dolphins who were trying to loot it.

    --
    Randy.Flood@RHCE2B.COM
  182. Don't Worry, Be Happy by LifesABeach · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's real simple, when these critters run out of darts, they'll return for more; That's when they'll get recaptured. Of course, if any of these things wonder into a "Liquor and Ammo" store in the "Big Easy"; Well, I'd hate to think what would happen if these critters got drunk AND reloaded all at the same time. Just how intelligent are these killers?

  183. insert scuba tank noise here by spepper · · Score: 1

    (insert scuba tank noise here) (Glancing to the rear at ghostly image appearing quicky, through the scuba mask): "What the.....NO, Flipper! NO Flipper! CEASE FIRE! CEASE FIRE!"

  184. statistics by paai · · Score: 0

    The great number of people who ridiculize this story is far greater than with
    other, equally unbelievable items on slashdot. Go ahead; count them.
    Now if /I/ were an intelligence officer with your navy, and if I wanted to suppress
    a story, I would likely try to drown it immediatly in ridicule. But I am just a
    common paranoid.

    Paai

    1. Re:statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Now if /I/ were an intelligence officer with your navy

      I find it to be very amusing how your website complains so much about how everything seems to revolve around the USA, but then you use the term "your", assuming that any given Slashdot reader is from the United States. That makes you hypocritical, eh?

  185. Bow down by kronchev · · Score: 2, Funny

    I for one, welcome our new Dolphin Overloards. Squee squee, masters.

  186. WTF? Guardian == TABLOID by JhohannaVH · · Score: 1

    When are you guys gonna realize that The Guardian is just a fancy tabloid like all the rest of the junk out there. They are one of the worst at spreading completely baseless stories with nothing but conspiratual CRAP. *sigh* But hey... that does make for some really funny stories!!! And it sure does take all kinds.

    Jho

    --
    Sorry man... the Internet pooped on me.
  187. Poisonous darts for dolphins... by Federico2 · · Score: 1

    ...why don't just use altready poisonous or dangerous fishes?

    "came on, bite that ass!
    No, no! That one!
    NO! Bad do^H^H piranha! "

  188. Frisky dolphins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Puts a whole new twist on this website, eh? http://web.archive.org/web/20040926071437/http://w ww.dolphinsex.org/

  189. Last message by Landshark17 · · Score: 1

    According to one researcher at the facility the dolphins escaped from, the last one out did a complicated triple back-flip while whistling "The Star Spangled Banner" which he correctly understood to mean, "So long, thanks for all the fish."

    --
    This sig is false.
  190. Johnny Mnemonic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can these dolphins help Johnny hack into his own brain and get the secret password so he can save the world from Nerve Attenuation Syndrome?

  191. You know it's true by IshmaelSquared · · Score: 1

    This is for all the SeaWorld tricks, bitch.

  192. And... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... the bikini !

  193. You Forgot ... by had+a+lobotomy · · Score: 1

    Dah Nah NAH, Daa NAA Naa Naa Naa

  194. Opposable Thumbs? by SlothB77 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How exactly are the darts fired? Do the dolphins pull the trigger with their fins?

    and i gotta say it: where are the sharks with laser beams attached to their heads?

  195. So long and Thanks for all the fish by biscayne07 · · Score: 1

    Hrmm... Maybe they left for another purpose...

  196. I'll be there next week! by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

    Hmmm... this makes me nervous.. I'm going to be at a convention at the Sheraton Sand Key in FL (just outside of Tampa) next week and plan on getting some waverunning in. Hopefully I wont be dodging projectiles from marine life.

    I think they should take the dolphins and put them into the floodwaters of NOLA. Maybe they could do a better job than their police department there! ;-)

    --
    Libertas in infinitum