Slashdot Mirror


Top 20 Geek Novels

Malacca writes "The Guardian's computer editor Jack Schofield has posted a list of the Top 20 Geek Novels in English since 1932. The polling method is unscientific, but it throws up some interesting choices. Definitions of 'Geek Novels' aside, the usual suspects like Neal Stephenson and William Gibson feature, but Terry Pratchett's 'The Colour of Magic' at #9? Neil Gaiman's "American Gods" at #17?" What would you put on that list?

563 comments

  1. The Colour of Magic is a weird choice... by Senjutsu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It should be Small Gods, and it should be higher.

    1. Re:The Colour of Magic is a weird choice... by DoorFrame · · Score: 2

      Small Gods was fantastic.

    2. Re:The Colour of Magic is a weird choice... by heeeraldo · · Score: 2

      I think it's more that it's the first in the series, because stuff that came afterwards (Small Gods, Hogfather, and Men At Arms come to mind) is, IMO, a lot better.

    3. Re:The Colour of Magic is a weird choice... by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Discworld needed to be represented in the list and TCoM was simply the first one in the series. I agree though that it should have been a better Discworld book. I'm not sure which one, but Small Gods is definately in the top 3.

    4. Re:The Colour of Magic is a weird choice... by Senjutsu · · Score: 1

      It's not just you, Pratchett once said his writing only began to mature starting with Sourcery. The early books are pretty amateurish, the latter brilliant.

    5. Re:The Colour of Magic is a weird choice... by Z0mb1eman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Small Gods was indeed amazing... though the night watch books tend to be my favourites.

      I'm not at all surprised to see Terry Pratchett on that list. Part of what make his books so enjoyable for me are all the small geeky touches... a magic manual whose name has the acronym MS-DOS (never actually spelled out for you... only noticed it on my second read)... pretty much anything that has to do with Unseen University - most of it rings oh so true for anyone who's ever been at an engineering or science university... All the references to technology, quantum mechanics, evolution, communications (heck, he's practically got an entire networking book in Going Postal)... Our society's technological history (and not only technological, to be fair) can all be found, in the context of a world where magic exists, and IT ALL MAKES SENSE - in its own twisted Discworld fashion.

      Yeah, you could say I'm a Terry Pratchett fan :p

      And my guess is the Colour of Magic is on the list because it's the first of the Discworld series. You can't really put all of them... they wouldn't fit in a top 20 :p

      Ahh, just noticed that the poll is from the UK... it makes a lot more sense now. Discworld is - for some reason - not quite as popular on this side of the pond. So if you haven't read any of the Discworld books, do yourself a favour and pick one up - yes, it's technically fantasy, but it's the funniest and most intelligent fantasy you're ever likely to read.

      --
      ClutterMe.com - easiest site creation on the Net. Just click and type.
    6. Re:The Colour of Magic is a weird choice... by Mo6eB · · Score: 1

      No, it should be Soul Music and it should be way higher.

    7. Re:The Colour of Magic is a weird choice... by hotzeyboy · · Score: 5, Informative

      While I love all the discworld books, "Going Postal" would definately be the one that I think belongs on this list. It even has a bunch of hackers named the GNU(which is still a recursive acronym), talks about packet space and involves a very low tech spoofing exploit.
      .

    8. Re:The Colour of Magic is a weird choice... by starwed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'll have to agree with one of the other posters: It's true that Small Gods is better. One of my favorite books of all time. But The Color of Magic is way geekier. ^_^

    9. Re:The Colour of Magic is a weird choice... by darklordyoda · · Score: 1

      Hogfather? Seriously? I thought it was terrible.

      Then again, my favorites were "The Truth" and pretty much any Watch book.

    10. Re:The Colour of Magic is a weird choice... by escay · · Score: 1

      i guess its because it was the first of the discworld series...they couldn't choose which was the best so they picked the first one! i love all of them, but 'interesting times' and 'lost continent' are readable ad infinitum sans nauseam!

    11. Re:The Colour of Magic is a weird choice... by heeeraldo · · Score: 1

      It was the first Death book that came to mind. I like the Watch books the most, too - I think my least favorite ones are the Rincewind books.

    12. Re:The Colour of Magic is a weird choice... by bfree · · Score: 3, Funny

      Actually the group is the Smoking GNU and GNU alone is a magic "packet header" for control messages (G) which are not logged (N) and are turned around and sent back at the end of the line (U). Of course that's something any good 14 year old girl of a clacks operator who had studied her manuals would know and if you aren't one of them how the hell did you ever find this truly bizarre corner of L-Space ... is that you Hex, Ponder? Oook?

      --

      Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

    13. Re:The Colour of Magic is a weird choice... by MilenCent · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course it's a matter of opinion....

      I think Colour of Magic was picked was because it was closer in tone to Hitchhiker's, in is extreme inventiveness and randomness. I agree that the later books are probably better (Small Gods, Reaper Man, Men at Arms, Soul Music, Last Hero), but anything with Rincewind as protagonist will always have a place in my heart....

    14. Re:The Colour of Magic is a weird choice... by masklinn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Now if only the first books could be rewritten by the current Terry Pratchett... oh lord...

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    15. Re:The Colour of Magic is a weird choice... by TheoGB · · Score: 1

      I think the Light Fantastic is better but not by much. Personally I think the 1st, 2nd, 4th and 5th Discworlds are the only truly great ones.

      The others have moments of greatness but they're too concerned with having a plot with humourous touches. The early stuff is just plain weird but great with it, much like the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.

    16. Re:The Colour of Magic is a weird choice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of the true geeks who enjoy Pratchett were probably too busy playing Discworld MUD to vote in this poll. I know I was, as I have been for years now.

      Enough of this distraction, this page has too much graphical content for me! Must ... return ... to pure text...

    17. Re:The Colour of Magic is a weird choice... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Informative
      I think my favourite geeky touch was the cryptographical engine whose acronym was E.N.I.G.M.A. (also not spelt out, and also only spotted on the second reading). The geek references have always been there though. In The Colour of Magic (I believe, possible The Light Fantastic) there is a druid talking about people wanting to upgrade to the latest 33 Megalith stone circles - published when a 486 DX 33 was top of the range.

      Another geeky author I can recommend is Jasper Fforde. The Well of Lost Plots, the penultimate book in the series that started with The Well of Lost Plots would appeal to many Slashdot readers (read the earlier ones first though) dealing, as it does, with the topic of DRM. Set in the book world, the world inside fiction, Thusday Next, litterary detective, discovers that the next version of the book OS (an upgrade from the old 8-plot system to a new, improved, 32-plot system with all sorts of extra features) contains a system which prevents a book from being read more than three times. It's full of references to classic literature and more geeky references (a large number of comments about old versions of the book OS, for example, held for old versions of MS DOS). A good read for anyone, and the book to use to explain DRM to your less technically inclined friends.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    18. Re:The Colour of Magic is a weird choice... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      Meh. I have no skill today. Corrected links:

      The Well of Lost Plots

      The Ayre Affair

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    19. Re:The Colour of Magic is a weird choice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, ill concede that its more likely that smoking GNU is more a pun on smoking GUN than on GNU hackers. However, I'd be surprised if Pratchett named a group of Hackers the GNU solely by coincidence. Especially since their attitute and behavious are those of typical geeks.

    20. Re:The Colour of Magic is a weird choice... by dpilot · · Score: 1

      Not Diskworld, but one that picks up both Pratchett and Gaiman, "Good Omens." I guess Gaiman is already on the list with Americal Gods, but Good Omens would kill 2 birds with one stone. Though I guess it is more for people who understood the 70's.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    21. Re:The Colour of Magic is a weird choice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Good omens" is not a good book, is boring all the time. Just Terry Pratchett being Terry Pratchett, Gaiman being Gaiman and resulting 1 + 1 less than 2.

    22. Re:The Colour of Magic is a weird choice... by misterbond · · Score: 1

      Surely it has to be pyramids if only for the impressive geek camels.

    23. Re:The Colour of Magic is a weird choice... by retrosteve · · Score: 1

      Yes. Small Gods is the best of the series, is a geek treasure, and should be higher.

    24. Re:The Colour of Magic is a weird choice... by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 1
      Now if only the first books could be rewritten by the current Terry Pratchett... oh lord...

      YES! Like a ... a ... a "Special Edition" of some sort, were he updates the series with new scenes. Nobody could have a problem with that.

      --

      "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
    25. Re:The Colour of Magic is a weird choice... by Shirlockc · · Score: 1

      I second the recommendation for Jasper Fford, though The Well of Lost Plots is not the first of the series, The Eyre Affair is the first. An extremely well-plotted novel, it evoked the sense of surfing the net, watching a movie, and reading at the same time. His latest series is in a similar universe but has different protagonists -- The Big Over Easy featuring the murder of Humpty Dumpty and the detectives Jack Spratt and Mary Mary from the Nursery Crimes Division. Jasper Fforde's home page is fun too.

    26. Re:The Colour of Magic is a weird choice... by Walsfeo · · Score: 1

      The Rincewind books are my least favorites of all, but it makes perfect sense for them to pick just one to represent the series. (I wish they had done that with the best space movies poll, that way Star Wars in all it's glory and suckatude could have been under one entry.) Also, even Pratchett's weakest stuff is better than most other author's best offering.

    27. Re:The Colour of Magic is a weird choice... by tjds3w · · Score: 1

      Nah. Pratchett knows more about quantum theory, encoding raster images, communications thory and the pure math of human greed and stupidity than nearly anyone in say, Redmond Washington, fr example. Catch some of the later novels in which young post grad Wizard, Ponder Stibbons coaxes HEX, the thinking machine in the new High Energy Magic building of Unseen University to think in partial bit clusters . . . then ponder. An extremely, hilariously funny choice, but wierd? Nah!

    28. Re:The Colour of Magic is a weird choice... by Q-Cat5 · · Score: 1

      For the little "buried" jokes, I have a fond spot in my heart for HEX being labeled with "Anthill Inside". (Things like "Ram Skulls", and the "Beehive long-term storage", having caused fits and snorts of laughter as well.)

      I still detest Rincewind. TCoM was my first Pratchett book, and would have been my last, were it not for friends who provided copies of the Watch series to convince me that the rest of Discworld was worth reading.

      --
      Raoul Mitgong: Unhelpful.
  2. Show some love for Arthur by Newrad · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Where the hell is the Arthur C. Clarke?

    1. Re:Show some love for Arthur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kiddie fiddlers weren't considered.

    2. Re:Show some love for Arthur by Doctor+Sbaitso · · Score: 4, Funny

      Somewhere in Sri Lanka, I presume.

      --

      ---
      Hello, Slashdot user. My name is Dr. Sbaitso. I am here to help you.
    3. Re:Show some love for Arthur by bcrowell · · Score: 1

      Which book do you have in mind? Childhood's End?

    4. Re:Show some love for Arthur by JeremyALogan · · Score: 1

      Oh come on... you can't have everything. It's a loose sampling used to construct a top ten list. I'm just waiting for the what about H. G. Wells, Ray Bradbury, Larry Niven, etc. Can you really complain if you didn't vote?

    5. Re:Show some love for Arthur by altoz · · Score: 1

      Or Orson Scott Card? (of whom many a slashdot post has been dedicated)
      or JRR Tolkien? (same as above)

    6. Re:Show some love for Arthur by nite_warrior · · Score: 1

      Sri Lanka?

    7. Re:Show some love for Arthur by nsmike · · Score: 1

      Imperial Earth all the way. Out of print, but my first Clarke novel, and by far my favorite still.

    8. Re:Show some love for Arthur by PokerAndroid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Rendezvous with Rama

    9. Re:Show some love for Arthur by SpasticWeasel · · Score: 1

      I Have heard rumours that he is a pederast, and moved to Sri Lanka to avoid possible prosecution. Is that true?

      --
      No sooner do I get over one, then you put a better one right next to me. Bastards.
    10. Re:Show some love for Arthur by Newrad · · Score: 1

      It's not out of print. Or atleast I was lucky enough to get one of the last copies ever.

    11. Re:Show some love for Arthur by Moofie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've heard rumors that you're a pederast. Is that true?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    12. Re:Show some love for Arthur by cshark · · Score: 1

      At least one of Gaimen's books made it to the list.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    13. Re:Show some love for Arthur by zaxus · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Rama II: Electric Boogaloo (sorry, couldn't resist). Both Rendezvous with Rama and Rama II were great books. Garden of Rama, however, not so much (IMHO). Never did get around to Rama Revealed.

      --
      /. zen: Imagine a Beowulf cluster of Beowulf clusters...
    14. Re:Show some love for Arthur by icybee · · Score: 1

      Sri Lanka, I think.

    15. Re:Show some love for Arthur by lorelorn · · Score: 1
      Sri Lanka

      probably preparing a video rebuttal as we speak

    16. Re:Show some love for Arthur by IngramJames · · Score: 4, Funny

      Forget Arthur, and forget Pratchett!

      Are they seriously trying to tell me that "The Complete ZX Spectrum ROM Disassembly" doesn't make the list?

      OK, it's not fiction, but the sheer beauty...

      </uber geek>

      --
      'No rational religion claims "supernatural" exists, that's an atheist slander.' - seen on slashdot.
    17. Re:Show some love for Arthur by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Informative
      I Have heard rumours that he is a pederast, and moved to Sri Lanka to avoid possible prosecution. Is that true?

      He is fairly open about being gay. He won a court case against the british newspaper which made the pedophilia allegations against him.

    18. Re:Show some love for Arthur by Grab · · Score: 1

      Huh? Clarke is a great futurist. However, as a writer he's awful. I read RwR, and my main thought was "how the hell could someone turn an expedition to an alien spacecraft into something so BORING?!?!"

      As for 2 and "Garden": no. Just no. I was half-tempted to get "Revealed" just to find out how it ended, but I realised I didn't give a shit, and in fact I'd stopped giving a shit *before* I started reading "Garden".

      Ben Bova, Greg Bear and Kim Stanley Robinson suffer from the same thing. Good ideas, but can't write.

      You want a good writer, go read Tad Williams. Like Neal Stephenson, he's still not worked out how to write endings, but the quality of writing will just blow you away. And if the Otherworld series isn't geeky enough, I don't know what is...

      Grab.

    19. Re:Show some love for Arthur by corbettw · · Score: 1

      Can you really complain if you didn't vote?

      Hell ya, you can! In fact, it's the people who vote who can't complain. You voted, it's your fault. I had nothing to do with it, I'm innocent.

      (With apologies to George Carlin.)

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    20. Re:Show some love for Arthur by Lonnold · · Score: 1

      Hear Hear! You have put into words what I felt about Clarke for a long time...great idea man, so-so writer. Bova and Bear also fall into this category, although they can be slightly more enjoyable at times.

      As for Kim Stanley Robinson, the only thing I have read of his was the Years of Rice and Salt, I kept waiting for something interesting to happen...

  3. First Prime Factorization Post by 2*2*3*75011 · · Score: 3, Funny

    The Guardian's computer editor Jack Schofield has posted a list of the Top 2*2*5 Geek Novels in English since 2*2*3*7*23. The polling method is unscientific, but my factorizations are geeky.

    1. Re:First Prime Factorization Post by julesh · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What's *really* geeky is that your username is a factorization of your uid. The only geekier thing would have been to wait until the next UID was prime. You'd have only had to wait until 900139!

    2. Re:First Prime Factorization Post by CaptnMArk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's more useful if you have a slashdot uid that has 2 prime factors.

    3. Re:First Prime Factorization Post by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1

      I'd like to know how he did that.

      OK, you get a throwaway account, find the next number, and prime factorise it. But what's to prevent someone else popping in there in the meantime?

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    4. Re:First Prime Factorization Post by julesh · · Score: 1

      OK, you get a throwaway account, find the next number, and prime factorise it. But what's to prevent someone else popping in there in the meantime?

      Nothing. But a quick top-of-the-head calculation based on my estimate of when I signed up for my account suggests that the average time between slashdot account creations is about 4 minutes, so as long as you aren't doing it at peak time (which is probably early evening eastern US, at a rough guess) you should be fine.

    5. Re:First Prime Factorization Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point. If you're unlucky and FAIL IT!!!!, I guess you rinse & repeat.

  4. pratchett by thej1nx · · Score: 1
    I can almost see the logic...

    Hmm pratchett... has a fan newsgroup where he regularly interacts. What a geek!

    qualified!!!

    1. Re: Pratchett by EddyPearson · · Score: 1

      :D Got to love the discworld.

      A (actually) less geeky friend of mine spents a good percentage of his time on a discworld MUD (telnet://discworld.atuin.net.

      I can't remember weather it was the Colour of Magic or the Light Fantastic, but in one of the Rincewind books he comes accross a "computer" built out of rocks. Must have been a factor in the decision.

      --
      You feel sleepy. Close your eyes. The opinions stated above are yours. You cannot imagine why you ever felt otherwise.
    2. Re:pratchett by georgewilliamherbert · · Score: 1
      Hmm pratchett... has a fan newsgroup where he regularly interacts. What a geek!
      Yes, but he also comes over to the US regularly for cons and book tours, and recognizes some of his fan base by sight and comes over to say hi.

      Obviously too well socialized to be a /. geek, but he is some sort...

      duck

  5. Just skimming but... by saitoh · · Score: 1

    looks good to me. I agree with #9, Colour of Magic is a fantastic book. I was surprised by American Gods though, I would have thought Good Omens would have made it in its place. Maybe it was selected for a different reason then what I'm thinking for. I think part of the reason is the question was about "geek" novels, not just science-fiction, but also fantasy.

    The top 10 are all novels which (while I havn't read them), I definately think of as geek novels that (such) people highly recomend.

    --
    We don't need an "overrated" so much as we need a "you completely missed the parent's point, dumbass..."
    1. Re:Just skimming but... by masklinn · · Score: 1
      I would have thought Good Omens would have made it in its place

      Seconded

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
  6. Tom Swift Jr. Series by Chr0me · · Score: 0

    Pick any one of them. While not the greatest in literature, from the time my father gave them to me to read as a kid I have always loved tinkering with stuff.

    Also, 13% against Neuromancer? WTF?

    1. Re:Tom Swift Jr. Series by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I still have most of the Tom Swift, Jr. series in a box somewhere. Been almost forty years since I read them, but they had much the same effect on me. The Polar-Ray Dynasphere, Spectromarine Selector, Electronic Retroscope, Repelatron Skyway, Jetmarine, Subocean Geotron, Caves of Nuclear Fire, Sonic Boom Trap, Giant Robot, Deep Sea Hydrodome, Triphibian Atomicar, 3-D Telejector, Atomic Earth Blaster, and so on. Can't believe I remembered all that. Not to mention the other miscellaneous inventions/discoveries like the Swift solar battery, Tomasite, Durastress, Serptilium, the Repelatron and that little nuclear power pack he invented for the Triphibian Atomicar, to name a few. I think first one I got was Tom Swift and his Jetmarine. I was hooked from the first chapter.

      Just incidentally, I discovered this: Tom Swift Lives although I haven't read any of them.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:Tom Swift Jr. Series by BJH · · Score: 1

      There were at least two Tom Swift Jr. series, I think - I recall reading a whole bunch of TSJr books that don't match with some of the lists of TSJr books I see on the web. I had about twenty-odd books - I definitely remember his Flying Lab, Giant Robot and Triphibian Atomicar - (was that the one with the floating highway above the jungle, or was that a separate book?)

    3. Re:Tom Swift Jr. Series by instarx · · Score: 1

      There were at least two Tom Swift Jr. series, I think

      There was the original Tom Swift series (1940's I think) and then in the Tom Swift, Jr. series, 50's and 60's.

  7. Enders Game by Catskul · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Where is "Ender's Game"?

    --

    Im not here now... Im out KILLING pepperoni
    1. Re:Enders Game by Otter · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Tolkien? Jules Verne? (I'm not a devotee, but she has a huge geek following -- Ayn Rand?) That other woman who writes those coma-inducing books the sci-fi buffs drool over, ummm, Ursula LeGuin?

    2. Re:Enders Game by Mutiny32 · · Score: 1

      I highly agree with the list, but I agree, Ender's Game should be on the list. Oh, and nice Ahnold parody quote. :)

    3. Re:Enders Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In hell with all the other favorites of closet pedophiles?

    4. Re:Enders Game by Danborg · · Score: 1

      Hell yeah, I had the same question. "Ender's Game" is my favorite book of all time.

    5. Re:Enders Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Intersting that you think of it that way...
       
      I think I know what Freud would say.

    6. Re:Enders Game by prichardson · · Score: 1

      Ayn Rand is nothing like LeGuin.

      --
      Help I'm a rock.
    7. Re:Enders Game by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      "Ayn Rand is nothing like LeGuin."

      Yes, but I'm genuinely not sure which one of them should take that as a complement (assuming both were still alive).

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    8. Re:Enders Game by ComputerSlicer23 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I'd agree. My only commentary on a possibly reason is that enough people who continued to read the series might have regretted it just as much as I did. "Ender's Game" was absolutely amazing. Unfortunately, someone had told me the surprise ending years earlier, and I remembered it before it was revealed in the story. The second book in the series wasn't too bad. However, the third book in the series made me seriously revise my opion of Orson Scott Card as an author. I had absolutely no idea why I was reading the book, and by the end, it streched well beyond any plausible set of physics, where the first in the books had generally stayed within the bounds of standard physics which I appreciated. There were some samll liberties taken, but even those are "reasonable" by SCI-FI standards. I couldn't bring myself to read the rest of them. I think there are seven in the series. It soured my opinion of OSC and of "Ender's Game".

      Kirby

    9. Re:Enders Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It shouldn't have Ender's Game, it should have Speaker for the Dead, Xenocide, or Children of the Mind, because everyone will read Ender's Game, but only geeks will keep reading after Ender's Game, and everyone else will get bored after they start reading Speaker.

    10. Re:Enders Game by prichardson · · Score: 1

      I'm leaving it open to interpretation, but personally I think LeGuin is better.

      --
      Help I'm a rock.
    11. Re:Enders Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful
      A previous post by Jack Schofield clears up this omission.
      http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/technology/archives/20 05/10/26/what_are_the_top_20_geek_novels_updated.h tml
      I'm in two minds about Ender's Game by Orson Scott Card. It's a brilliant story, no doubt about that. Orson is also geeky enough -- in the 80s, he even worked for a computer magazine to which I contributed. But Ender's Game is a straightforward story with a twist. It doesn't force you to keep rewriting your mental maps, like, say, The Eye in the Pyramid.

      Seems like he defines a great geek novel as one that expands your horizons instead of confirming your expectations and worldview.
      On a related note, here's a list of books that will induce a mindfuck. http://everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1016251
    12. Re:Enders Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, isn't Ender's Game an alegory about Hitler and fascism? A defense of the Holocaust?

    13. Re:Enders Game by Catskul · · Score: 1

      Spot on!

      ...And Noah's Arc is obviously about affirmative action.

      --

      Im not here now... Im out KILLING pepperoni
    14. Re:Enders Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Lathe of Heaven or at least The Left Hand of Darkness should definitely have a spot.

    15. Re:Enders Game by DrEasy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, this is about "Top 20 Geek Novels in English since 1932", so Jules Verne would be a no-go for at least two reasons by that definition...

      --
      "In our tactical decisions, we are operating contrary to our strategic interest."
    16. Re:Enders Game by DeafByBeheading · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately, someone had told me the surprise ending years earlier, and I remembered it before it was revealed in the story.

      Using the word "surprise" loosely... I don't especially want to turn this into a discussion of the merits of "Ender's Game" (you can search Slashdot for that), but I thought I'd throw out a dissenting vote since there's so much gushing over it.

      I was only surprised by the ending because it was so obvious, I honestly couldn't believe that Card chose to take that plot "twist". By the time I was a few dozen pages from the end, I was thinking "He wouldn't...", but he did. Bleh. Add to that that Ender's whole struggle just didn't resonate with me (it takes a lot to really convey that the whole weight of the world is riding on someone's shoulders, and I think Card does a mediocre job at best), and I wasn't impressed.

      I dunno. Maybe I should have read it as an ansgty teen or something.
      --
      Telltale Games: Bone, Sam and Max
    17. Re:Enders Game by Omestes · · Score: 1

      Ayn Rand isn't a geek novelist. It's faux philosophical fiction for people who want to feel good about being greedy. I think most geeks don't like her, but this is /., also known as the totality of the Libertarian party.

      Not a value judgement, some people might like her. Doesn't stop her from being in the top five of my "If I could Go Back in Time and Kill Famous Dead People" list, though.

      LeGuin has written a couple decent short stories, though.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    18. Re:Enders Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yup, Ender's Game is the only Ender book I like also. you should check out the Bean books (5-7) though, they are pretty entertaining.

    19. Re:Enders Game by ComputerSlicer23 · · Score: 1
      You read the book differently when you realize at page 20 you know the "surprise" ending that the basic plot doesn't even discuss the elements of it for 200 pages. The only completely obvious tell I remember was that the "real" battles used lessons learned about techniques he'd done only on the "simulator". I don't believe that was more then 20-30 pages before it was revealed in the book. It might have been a good guess on your part, unless I missed several other more subtle foreshadowings.

      I read the book in my mid-20's, and it was an enjoyable read. Maybe I liked it so much, because I was very clever for a person my age growing up, and that I was a physical misfit all my life. I've been one of the tallest people in my age group nearly all my life. Which is very unusual. So maybe Ender's struggles were something I related to better.

      Personally, I enjoyed Ender's struggles and having to deal with bullies and older children. His having more and more pressure heaped on him until he broke (or didn't). Dealing with greater and greater handicaps and overcoming was fairly compelling to me. His time in school was the best part of the book. The stuff where he was battling the aliens wasn't that great, but I did like it far better then the rest of Card's other books.

      Kirby

    20. Re:Enders Game by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Definately a top geek book and series.. Hyperion is a good series too.

      One that is one of my favorite geek novels that wasn't mentioned was bruce Sterling's Distraction.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    21. Re:Enders Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is "It's faux philosophical fiction for people who want to feel good about being greedy" not a value judgement?

      I don't like her, either, but at least have the balls to stand behind your opinion

    22. Re:Enders Game by n54 · · Score: 1

      It's ok not to like Ayn Rand (I'm not all that familiar with her ideas myself but the little I've read/know doesn't sit too well with me) but talking about killing her is either a really bad joke on your part or makes you look like some kind of a kook. Who are the other famous people on that list of yours? Does it feature persons like Hitler and Stalin? And if so what kind of reasoning would make you lump Ayn Rand in with that sort of people?

      If that list of yours features George W. Bush you need not reply.

      --
      this comment is provided "as is" and without any express or implied legibility or congruity [...]
    23. Re:Enders Game by instarx · · Score: 1

      but this is /., also known as the totality of the Libertarian party.

      What /. are YOU reading? In my estimation most slashdotters are liberal, not ultra-conservative libertarians.

      Ayn Rand isn't a geek novelist. It's faux philosophical fiction for people who want to feel good about being greedy.Not a value judgement, some people might like her. Doesn't stop her from being in the top five of my "If I could Go Back in Time and Kill Famous Dead People" list, though.

      Ayn Rand's philosophy has been hijacked by Libertarians and has been subverted to their cause. As most people have never read her books their ideas about her philosphy come from the Libertarian crackpots out there. Ms Rand really championed the value of the individual, not greed. Her philosophy championed the blacksmith or the street sweeper for their honest labor just as the industrialist for his. Nothing to do with greed there! In fact, most of the Libertarians I hear remind me a lot more of Elsworth Toohey than Howard Rourke.

      You are right though - Ayn Rand did not write geek books.

    24. Re:Enders Game by zerocool^ · · Score: 2, Informative


      To quote my wife, who has read them all (ender's game, speaker for the dead, xenocide, children of the mind, ender's shadow, shadow of the hegemon, shadow puppets, as well as Songmaster, the call of earth, and probably more - she reads alot):

      "Orson Scott Card is an author who can't write a sequel to save his life."

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
    25. Re:Enders Game by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      I have highly enjoyed all of the sequels so far. The trick is that Speaker for the Dead to Children of the Mind is actually a sequel series and should never have been marketed as a direct sequel to Ender's Game.

    26. Re:Enders Game by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 1

      While we're going all "missing options" ala Slashdot-poll on this fella's ass, can I query the possible absence of "Godel Escher Bach" by Douglas Hofstadter? Presumably it fails to be classified as a "novel" even though maybe 50% is fiction containing the same characters throughout...

    27. Re:Enders Game by DarkSarin · · Score: 0

      I don't _think_ you and I see eye to eye as to what makes Libertarianism what it is, or whether or not it is valuable, but I will certainly agree that there seem to be FAR more liberals here than Libertarians. I only wish it were otherwise...

      --
      "We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
    28. Re:Enders Game by rs79 · · Score: 1

      "It's ok not to like Ayn Rand but talking about killing her is either a really bad joke on your part or makes you look like some kind of a kook... ...George W. Bush..."

      Ok, I am a kook.

      How bout a two-fer?

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    29. Re:Enders Game by dada21 · · Score: 1

      GED: EGB formulated my mind as a late teen and caused me to not go to college.

      Hofstadter replied to his university e-mails in hours even 14 years ago. Great book. Motion IS inherently impossible!

    30. Re:Enders Game by malelder · · Score: 1

      Personally, I don't think it's so much a "politics" thing, but an "age" thing, where, while I know we do have our fair share of "old folks", I'm guessing most readers (and repliers) are under 30...maybe an editor can provide numbers for proof.

      This ties in to something my father told me, "If you're under 30 and not a Democrat, you don't have a heart. If you're over 30 and you're not a Republican, you don't have a brain." A little general, but I've always found it a humorous and, most of the time, true statement.

      Back on topic, I'm upset Neuromancer wasn't #1, and Illuminatus at least in the top 5. I've read the trilogy at least 20 times. I own at least 2 copies of that huge beast, and I think 4 Neuromancers...I keep loaning them out, then wanting to read them and buying another, then getting my "original" back again (:

      --


      Yuma, AZ...You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious.
    31. Re:Enders Game by IvanGirderboot · · Score: 1

      I too was dissapointed by the lack of ender's game -- it's such a classic.

      The Enemy Gate is Down.

    32. Re:Enders Game by DarkSarin · · Score: 1

      Actually I was a bit disappointed that the Otherland series didn't even get mentioned (Tad Williams). I haven't read the Neuromancer or Illuminatus (I know--here's my card; can I have it back when I've read them?), but to me Otherland is about as geeky as it gets.

      Tad Williams is also a geek himself--from what I know he does a bit of programming, dabbles in any number of things, and is an interesting guy.

      --
      "We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
    33. Re:Enders Game by Omestes · · Score: 1

      It was mostly a joke, as that I think everyone and history has made a positive impact on the present (even if as a negative example). I guess I should have used the word "bitch-slap" instead of kill, or perhaps "talk common sense into".

      I'm sorry for the badness. Every time I read Ayn Rand, though, it leaves a bad taste in my mouth.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    34. Re:Enders Game by malelder · · Score: 1

      K, I'll keep your card safe...now goto Amazon.com! (;

      I have the Otherland books sitting by my bed, just never got to reading them. Seen them mentioned enough in this discussion that I guess I better check them out. Working on the Quicksilver trilogy (Stephenson) right now, and enjoying them a lot so far. A lot different then the more cyberpunkish books, but a heck of a story (:

      --


      Yuma, AZ...You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious.
    35. Re:Enders Game by Omestes · · Score: 1

      I guess you have a point, I'm just so climatized to liberals where I live (college town, mountain town, all that), that I generally just ignore them now. And the louder liberals here all get moderated down I think, but the louder Libertarians, it seems, get modded up.

      Mind, that I'm not really insulting any of them. I just agree that Aynnie (if I may be so bold) seems to be the libertarian favorite.

      I kind of equate her style of individuality with greed, in that both of them are embracing ones ego to a point that I think is harmful to society. Granted she makes it look good on paper, but Marx made communism look good on paper too. Perhaps, like Marx, it boils down to all things in moderation.

      Its been awhile since I've had the time, or stomach, to read her, perhaps I should try it again for a purely objective reading of her, detatching all the stuff that extreme free market folk, and such, have attached to her.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    36. Re:Enders Game by Canordis · · Score: 1

      Verne and Ayn Rand don't qualify - the list is 1931+ only. RTFA.

      --
      I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: "O Lord, make my enemies ridiculous." And God granted it.
    37. Re:Enders Game by Otter · · Score: 1

      While I stand partially corrected, Ayn Rand's major works were written well after 1931.

    38. Re:Enders Game by instarx · · Score: 1

      Working on the Quicksilver trilogy (Stephenson) right now, and enjoying them a lot so far.

      I know I am going to get slammed for this because Stephenson seems to be a slashdot icon, but how can anyone like Stephenson's writing? I ended throwing away the only Stephenson book I ever bought after he took two entire pages to describe a parking lot - including how many and what kind of cars were in it, the height of the curbs and the thickness of the paint lines! In my opinion Stephenson just substitutes tons of filler and useless data for story-line and calls it a book.

    39. Re:Enders Game by jgrahn · · Score: 1
      I know I am going to get slammed for this because Stephenson seems to be a slashdot icon [...]

      No; the PC thing on Slashdot these days is to make fun of Stephenson's writing. Don't worry; you're conformant.

    40. Re:Enders Game by cwspain · · Score: 1

      Speaker was not originally planned as a sequel to Ender's Game. As the idea was developing, he realized that Ender would fit into the story. In order to make it a sequel without an obnoxious amount of exposition he expanded Ender's Game from a novella into a full-length novel. Speaker for the Dead is the reason that Ender's Game is the novel that it is.

      Xenocide was not even part of Card's original intent. His publisher sold the overseas publishing rights for the Ender trilogy, then asked Card if he would be so kind as to make it a trilogy so they would not have to renegotiate. He decided that he would like the chance to explore the concept of Jane and work out what happened to the hive queen, but what we got is probably very different than what Card would have written if he chose to continue the series without prodding.

      --
      He who reflects on another man`s want of breeding, shows he wants it as much himself --Julius Caesar, per Plutarch
    41. Re:Enders Game by malelder · · Score: 1

      Heh, which book was it? In all fairness to authors, I'd have to say the same thing about Tolkien...I love the books, but its pretty heavy on the description in places (; I'm curious which title you were reading, cuz I can think of at least two of his books where a description like that would be important to the story (;

      Anyway, I just noticed (yeah, i read the article the first time, just not close enough I guess), that this poll was created from 132 responses...definately not even enough responses to be considered valid. Neuromancer should of been #1, and then Gibson probably should of had at least 3 more spots on there (;

      This seemed closer to the "Top 20 Nerd Books", not the "Top 20 Geeky Books".

      --


      Yuma, AZ...You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious.
    42. Re:Enders Game by DarkSarin · · Score: 1

      I'll get to Amazon when I have some cash--grad school can suck at times!

      FWIW, the Otherland series rocks.

      I'll definitely get to the Stephenson stuff sometime soon.

      --
      "We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
    43. Re:Enders Game by NaDrew · · Score: 1
      I ended throwing away the only Stephenson book I ever bought after he took two entire pages to describe a parking lot - including how many and what kind of cars were in it, the height of the curbs and the thickness of the paint lines!
      I have to assume you're talking about the scene in Cryptonomicon where the Waterhouse family is dividing up an estate (was it Grandmother Waterhouse's?). The parking lot is a pretty obvious--stated, even--metaphor for the equitable division of loot.
      --
      Vista:XPSP2::ME:98SE
    44. Re:Enders Game by instarx · · Score: 1

      I have to assume you're talking about the scene in Cryptonomicon where the Waterhouse family is dividing up an estate (was it Grandmother Waterhouse's?). The parking lot is a pretty obvious--stated, even--metaphor for the equitable division of loot.

      I guess I didn't even get to THAT parking lot description, thank God. It *was* Cryptnomicon and the scene involved some Federal agents trying to confiscate a computer, some geeks with an EMP device, and some people standing around, one of whom was eating some fast food. As I recall the stupid McMuffin and the paper it was wrapped in was described in great detail, too! There were no metaphors. In my opinion Stephenson is just one lousy writer.

      Look, I didn't throw the book away just because of one two-page parking lot description - it was just the last straw in a long series of excruciatingly detailed descriptions that had had no purpose other than getting more words in the book so it could have a higher selling price.

    45. Re:Enders Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've got a split personality?

    46. Re:Enders Game by n54 · · Score: 1

      Reading your reply I relax but I just had to speak up about the "kill". Anyway thanks for replying, it's sorted out now :)

      I agree a lot with "everyone and history has made a positive impact on the present (even if as a negative example)" and I can sympathize with getting a bad vibe from reading her stuff (I don't think I'm getting quite as bad a reaction as you but I'm sure I have similar feelings towards other thoughts/philosophies).

      --
      this comment is provided "as is" and without any express or implied legibility or congruity [...]
  8. What?! No J.R.R?!?! by Pastey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comon, a list of the top 20 geek stories and Lord of the Rings isn't on it?! This is a list made about nerds, not BY nerds!

    1. Re:What?! No J.R.R?!?! by Lithgon · · Score: 1

      Tolkien was a professor of the english language and literature at Oxford. Hardly a nerd or a geek.

    2. Re:What?! No J.R.R?!?! by afidel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A guy who writes FIVE seperate languages just for a book is a hardcore geek. I mean he invented Elvish (including Quenya and Sindarin), Dwarvish (Khuzdul), Entish, and Black Speech. He might not have been a technology geek but he was definitly a geek.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    3. Re:What?! No J.R.R?!?! by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      Being a geek doesn't necessarily mean computer geek you know. Tolkien invented the Elvish language, for Bob's sake. I would consider that quite geeky. (in a good way, of course!)

    4. Re:What?! No J.R.R?!?! by General+Wesc · · Score: 1
      Tolkien was a professor of the english language and literature at Oxford. Hardly a nerd or a geek.
      GL.
    5. Re:What?! No J.R.R?!?! by Jeremi · · Score: 1
      Tolkien was a professor of the english language and literature at Oxford. Hardly a nerd or a geek


      I don't see why being a professor would disqualify Tolkien from geek-hood -- more likely it does just the opposite. In any case, it's a list of books for geeks, not books by geeks, so JRR's personal geek level isn't that relevant.


      That said, any author who goes to the trouble of inventing entire languages complete with full grammar and vocabulary, just for the characters in his books to use, is probably a geek ;^)

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    6. Re:What?! No J.R.R?!?! by Chemicalscum · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Not a Geek certainly but Nerd maybe. His novels encourage the nerdish behaviur of descending into a fanasy world for months on end.

      On the other hand his books' medievalist anti-technological bias is enough to make any real geek vomit. Anyway who would want to ba wasting their time on that crap when they coukd be doing something cool on their computer.

    7. Re:What?! No J.R.R?!?! by mike2R · · Score: 2, Informative

      More to the point, he invented five languages as a hobby, and then wrote a book to go with them.

      Definately a geek...

      --
      This sig all sigs devours
    8. Re:What?! No J.R.R?!?! by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A guy who writes FIVE seperate languages just for a book is a hardcore geek. I mean he invented Elvish (including Quenya and Sindarin), Dwarvish (Khuzdul), Entish, and Black Speech. He might not have been a technology geek but he was definitly a geek.

      Yep, a linguist geek. From his biography:

      Even as a young boy, Tolkien loved languages. He invented his own, but his mother viewed them as a waste of his time. "As a child, I was always inventing languages. But that was naughty," Tolkien recalled wryly. "Poor boys must concentrate on getting scholarships. When I was supposed to be studying Latin and Greek, I studied Welsh and English. When I was supposed to be concentrating on English, I took up Finnish."

      Through the door of language Tolkien entered the world of myth. "The seed [of the myth] is linguistic, of course. I'm a linguist and everything is linguistic--that's why I take such pains with names." A language, he believed, could not remain abstract. It must arise within a history and a culture--or, if lacking that, a mythology. Soon he would create for his own languages a most elaborate world indeed.


      How many authors write stories like that? It's almost as if the story was an afterthought created by the linguistics. I.e. the linguistics were so rich that a story grew around them.

      Most authors write like this: Story(as a rough outline) -> Characters(including setting) -> Details(such as language, customs, etc.)

      as opposed to Tolkien who did the opposite:

      Tolkien: Language -> Culture -> Characters -> Story

      Robert E. Howard is the only other fantasy author I can think of who wrote like that, except Howard built his stories (Conan) over a predetermined geography rather than a predermined language. Interestingly, both J.R.R. Tolkein and Robert E. Howard wrote fantasy in the 1930s, and are considered pillars of the genre.

      --
      The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
    9. Re:What?! No J.R.R?!?! by toonworld · · Score: 1
      There's also the fact that The Lord Of The Rings Trilogy is known to be the 2nd most read book in the world... next to The Bible.

      That alone deserves a top 5 spot!

      --
      It's not the destination that matters, but rather the journey.
    10. Re:What?! No J.R.R?!?! by Smuffe · · Score: 1

      I agree completely with your analysis of how Tolkien invented first the world, and then the story.

      Nowdays I get so annoyed that every fantasy author has to invent his own cultures, languages and other drivel when it is obivous they have no real knowledge of it. They just wrote a cool story and then had to fill about 600 extra pages with complete drivel and strange pronounciations. It's like most of them assume that since Tolkien did it, I have to as well otherwise it's not fantasy.

    11. Re:What?! No J.R.R?!?! by Malacca · · Score: 1

      I failed to mention in the submission that the poll was as scientific as a /. one.

      In the ballot, you were limited to a pre-selected list.

  9. Ringworld... by mikael · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I thought the "Ringworld" series by Larry Niven would have been worth a mention.. whatever happened to the movie that was supposed to be in production?

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    1. Re:Ringworld... by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      If they were to include Ringworld (Which was a lacking series and really wasn't that amazing [Though it totally captivated me when I read it] it would push somehting off.

      Books I wish were on the list mainly Enders Game and Macroscope which is a totally amazing book.

    2. Re:Ringworld... by aldeng · · Score: 5, Funny

      They re-did the story and called it Halo.

    3. Re:Ringworld... by Blue+Mushroom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      aldeng -

      Either you haven't read books in the ringworld series or you haven't played halo. Indeed, both the books and the game feature a giant ring-shaped object in space, the inner surfaces of which contain whole ecosystems. That's about where the similarities end, however. The actual story plots and universes have few if any elements in common. Whoever modded you +4 insightful must have just modded something up that sounded intuitively like it was accurate.

      --

      "Humanity lives and dies by its capabilities of communication, or lack thereof."

    4. Re:Ringworld... by khazad · · Score: 1

      Ringworld is a great story with a lot of great ideas, but I was very disappointed to find out that the writing is so terrible. How did it become such a classic?

    5. Re:Ringworld... by AlphaJoe · · Score: 1

      Everyone always brings up Ringworld with Larry Niven, but I have always been more partial towards The Integral Trees and Footfall, although Footfall was a collaboration between Niven and Pournell. Of course, when you put those two together, you get some great stuff, such as The Mote in Gods Eye and Inferno.

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.
    6. Re:Ringworld... by mikael · · Score: 1

      It was probably because of the topological concept of having a single spherical planet replaced by a ring completely encircling a star, thereby making a more efficient use of the energy output of that star, and at the same time preventing any problems of overcrowding. And both the problem of creating night-time and solar flares are solved by having an alternating ring of panels rotating around the star.
      Every problem solved by technology, except for the usual culture clashes caused by different alien species living next to each other.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    7. Re:Ringworld... by idontgno · · Score: 1
      Every problem solved by technology, except for the usual culture clashes caused by different alien species living next to each other.

      And those problems are solved by inter-species sex.

      So, yes, this series is about as geek as it gets. Either technofetish or exotic alien sex.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    8. Re:Ringworld... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like the comment at the bottom of the page

      This science fiction-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.


  10. No Arthur Clarke? by jcr · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Sorry, can't take this seriously at all.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  11. What about Tolkien? by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Where the hell is the Arthur C. Clarke?
    That is a good question, but I myself am wondering about the conspicuous absense of John Ronald Reuel Tolkien. Is the Lord of the Rings not geeky enough?
    1. Re:What about Tolkien? by JeremyALogan · · Score: 5, Funny
      ...I myself am wondering about the conspicuous absense of John Ronald Reuel Tolkien. Is the Lord of the Rings not geeky enough?
      I think that counts as the Geek Bible.


      Shamelessly stolen from Chris in the original thread.
    2. Re:What about Tolkien? by patio11 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      See, after the movies came out Tolkien is now not just a cult hit but genuinely *popular*, and whats the point of listing him if we can't look down our noses at those not in the geek club?

    3. Re:What about Tolkien? by General+Wesc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I consider the Silmarillion that.

    4. Re:What about Tolkien? by Jerry+Coffin · · Score: 1
      I consider the Silmarillion that.

      But hardly a surprising omission -- just too few people have actually read the whole thing. I only barely finished it, and I'm not sure I've met anybody else who did at all. Certainly more Biblical anyway...

      --
      The universe is a figment of its own imagination.

      --
      The universe is a figment of its own imagination.
    5. Re:What about Tolkien? by asb · · Score: 2, Funny

      Is the Lord of the Rings not geeky enough?

      Nope. It's way too nerdy.

      --
      Antti S. Brax - Old school - http://www.iki.fi/asb/
    6. Re:What about Tolkien? by Omestes · · Score: 1

      Actually, I still do.

      The movies were lacking tons of things. Now we just get to compain more. Also, what non-geek really wants to sit through 1000+ pages of backstory, poetry, and languages?

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    7. Re:What about Tolkien? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2
      Well, if the reason why one would expect LotR on the list is the implied (and certainly existing) correlation between geeks and role-players, then I think The Silmarillion should be there even higher. At least from my experience, most serious rp'ers I know like The Silmarillion more. I've personally re-read it 4 times in two different languages, compared to only 2 times for LotR...

      And yes, surprisingly, I have a girlfriend. She had only read it twice, though. ;)

    8. Re:What about Tolkien? by snookums · · Score: 4, Funny
      I've personally re-read it 4 times in two different languages

      It doesn't count unless one of those languages is the original Quenya.


      --
      Be careful. People in masks cannot be trusted.
    9. Re:What about Tolkien? by nizo · · Score: 5, Funny
      You haven't read the Silmarilion until you've read it in the original Elvish.

      Anyone who knows the similiar Star Trek quote this is derived from can safely assume right now that he will die a virgin by the way.

    10. Re:What about Tolkien? by thephotoman · · Score: 1

      Except that according to the story, the Quenta Silmarilion was actually told in Quena (with parts in Sindarin). Shakespeare never even heard of Klingon. And it's a fairly well-known quote--most of my friends, both male and female would get the reference.

      --
      Haec merda tauri est. Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
    11. Re:What about Tolkien? by zaxus · · Score: 1, Funny

      I know precisely where that quote came from (Christopher Lee, Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country), and I am MOST CERTAINLY not a virgin. I even have the wife and kid to prove it! :-)

      I also somehow managed to get through the Silmarilion, although I think I may reread it. I almost liked it better than the LoTR proper.

      --
      /. zen: Imagine a Beowulf cluster of Beowulf clusters...
    12. Re:What about Tolkien? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 0

      Still learning that...

    13. Re:What about Tolkien? by Anubis350 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I even have the wife and kid to prove it!

      Ahhhh.. so you mean you're not getting laid *anymore*?

      Burn karma, burn!

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    14. Re:What about Tolkien? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's not christopher lee, it's christopher plummer. doh no sex for me!

    15. Re:What about Tolkien? by meringuoid · · Score: 4, Funny
      You haven't read the Silmarilion until you've read it in the original Elvish.

      Nobody alive in the world has ever read the Silmarillion in the original Elvish. JRRT read it in the Red Book of Westmarch, where it was included as Bilbo's Translations from the Elvish; this would have been written in Westron, the common language of the countries of northwestern Middle-earth at the end of the Third Age. He translated the Red Book into the English with which we are familiar, and later published Bilbo's diary There and Back Again and Frodo's The Downfall of the Lord of the Rings and the Return of the King as fiction because nobody would take all this elf stuff seriously otherwise. The Translations from the Elvish seemed to have posed more difficulty in translation to English and in editing, though Christopher has done a pretty decent job in cleaning up the conflicting versions to give us the Silmarillion we know today.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    16. Re:What about Tolkien? by CheechBG · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ahem, not quite. It's Christopher Plummer, and the original quote goes something like this...

      "You have not heard Shakespeare until you have read it in the original Klingon!"

      Guess who's coming to dinner...

    17. Re:What about Tolkien? by LocoMan · · Score: 2, Funny

      The real trick would be to read it in old entish... though it would probably take a few months of non stop reading just to finish the first page.. :)

    18. Re:What about Tolkien? by WiFiBro · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Aha, but the film did not answer such questions as: WHAT is Tom Bombadil http://tolkien.slimy.com/essays/Bombadil.html#Summ ary, and WE can feel really smug knowing what REALLY happened to Aragorn.

      -
      Tired he is, thirsty he is, and he guides them and he searches for paths, and they say sneak sneak.

    19. Re:What about Tolkien? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    20. Re:What about Tolkien? by raider_red · · Score: 1

      Are you sure the kid's yours? Unless he's quoting Star Trek and writing Perl scripts, I might have my doubts.

      --
      It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
    21. Re:What about Tolkien? by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Informative
      The real trick would be to read it in old entish...

      Interesting. If I remember correctly, the first words of the book were There was Eru. Now, Fangorn tells us that in Old Entish any name is actually in itself the story of what it names. He himself, as perhaps the oldest living thing in Middle-earth (AFAIK only Bombadil, the Maiar and maybe Cirdan are of the same kind of age) has a truly spectacular name that would take days to read in full.

      Now, given Entish naming conventions, what would the name of Eru Iluvatar be like? It seems to me that the Entish name of Eru would in fact be a complete history of Creation, including the entire Silmarillion, because the whole thing is part of Iluvatar's story. It would, then, certainly take several weeks just to read the first page - but you'd be finished after word number three.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    22. Re:What about Tolkien? by felis_panthera · · Score: 1

      safely assume right now that he will die a virgin by the way

      unless I..... uh, I mean 'he'... finds a geek chick who (despite not being much of a Trekker) still recognized the homage to General Chang...

      --

      The chains are broken
      Loki is free
      Ragnarok is at hand...
    23. Re:What about Tolkien? by Flyboy+Connor · · Score: 1
      Anyone who knows the similiar Star Trek quote this is derived from can safely assume right now that he will die a virgin by the way.

      It's Shakespeare and Klingon, but since I already lost my virginity by the time I first encountered the relevant episode, I assume my experience doesn't really count. I guess I should be happy that I have been spared this wretched fate.

    24. Re:What about Tolkien? by ysegalov · · Score: 1

      There are two different translation of 'Hobbit' to Hebrew. The story goes:
      during the ongoing war between Israel and Egypt in 1970, a group of 10 Israeli pilots were taken as POWs by Egypt. During the few years they were in prison, they got a package from the Red Cross with the books 'Hobbit' and the ring trilogy (in English). In order to keep themselves occupied, they translated 'Hobit' to Hebrew. It took them 4 months to complete the job. After that they did not go to translating the trilogy (although they were in prison for 3 more years!) because they said the translation caused a lot of arguments between them, and disrupted the shared life they tried to create.
      I read their translation and it is a fairly good one.

    25. Re:What about Tolkien? by miller701 · · Score: 1
      You haven't read the Silmarilion until you've read it in the original Elvish.

      Nobody alive in the world has ever read the Silmarillion in the original Elvish.

      You could've stopped right there but,

      JRRT read it in the Red Book of Westmarch, where it was included as Bilbo's Translations from the Elvish; this would have been written in Westron, the common language of the countries of northwestern Middle-earth at the end of the Third Age. He translated the Red Book into the English with which we are familiar, and later published Bilbo's diary There and Back Again and Frodo's The Downfall of the Lord of the Rings and the Return of the King

      Could've stopped here too, but

      as fiction because nobody would take all this elf stuff seriously otherwise. The Translations from the Elvish seemed to have posed more difficulty in translation to English and in editing, though Christopher has done a pretty decent job in cleaning up the conflicting versions to give us the Silmarillion we know today.

      I'm sorry, that's just wrong.

    26. Re:What about Tolkien? by nizo · · Score: 1

      I wonder if that version is printed on paper made from Ents (or perhaps the missing Entwives)?

    27. Re:What about Tolkien? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Anyone who knows the similiar Star Trek quote this is derived from can safely assume right now that he will die a virgin by the way.
      It's from Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country, made by General Chang. He's referring to Hamlet, I think. Something like, "You haven't read Hamlet until you've read it in the original Klingon."

      Die a virgin, I wish! At least I might die a rich man then, instead of a pauper.

      Girlfriend: Defined as a nightmare... sent from Hell... by the Devil.

      I don't know why everyone is so down on virginity. All my life of skirt chasing has left me is a broken and bitter man.

    28. Re:What about Tolkien? by Ruphuz · · Score: 1
      I consider the Silmarillion that.

      The Silmarillion can be reckoned as the Old Testament.

      --
      My other post is a First.
    29. Re:What about Tolkien? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Ahhhh.. so you mean you're not getting laid *anymore*?

      Hah. Wait till the mods are in the same situation in 20 years time, and see how funny they think it is then.

    30. Re:What about Tolkien? by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1
      It doesn't count unless one of those languages is the original Quenya.

      QI'yaH! To truly appreciate Tolkien, you have to read his works in the original Klingon.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    31. Re:What about Tolkien? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You haven't read the Silmarilion until you've read it in the original Elvish.

      Elvish is everwhere.
      Elvish is everything.
      Elvish is everbody.
      Elvish is still the king.

      Thank you. Thank you very much.

    32. Re:What about Tolkien? by Thangodin · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that Joe Micheal Straczynski in Babylon 5 draws heavily on both the Silmarilion and The Lord of the Rings. In my original D&D campaign years ago I called the main city of the ancient empire Minbar-- "first home" in Quenya, and the Wizard's Council the Grey Council. I used a lot of other Quenya and Sindarin derived names as well, and came up with my own dark speech based in part on the Black Speech of Mordor. Straczynski did a lot of the same for the series. Now everyone thinks those are from B5. We just happened to be drawing from the same source. :)

    33. Re:What about Tolkien? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've personally re-read it 4 times in two different languages


      It doesn't count unless one of those languages is the original Quenya.


      JFYI the original Red book was not in Quenya or any other Elvish language. It was in Westron, the lingua franca of Middle-Earth.

    34. Re:What about Tolkien? by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      Elvish is everwhere.
      Elvish is everything.
      Elvish is everbody.
      Elvish is still the king.


      You kill me, J.R.R. Stiller.

      (I wonder how many other people recognize your quote?)

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    35. Re:What about Tolkien? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too late. I am already a grandmother and read it stoned for the first time at 17. I am still a leaf on the wind.

    36. Re:What about Tolkien? by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > I consider the Silmarillion that.

      Really obsessive Tolkien fans generally consider LOTR to be higher in the canon than the Silmarillion. Among other things, there are different drafts and variants of the Silmarillion, and generally for any given point the version that fits best with especially LOTR and secondarily There and Back Again (if one particular reading does fit better) is considered the preferred reading. Failing that, the "published Silmarillion" (the reading selected by Christopher Tolkien) is usually preferred over the others, unless there is a question of internal consistency. In other words, there's no draft of the Silmarillion that can really be considered fully authoritative; whereas, the LOTR as published is considered to be practically verbatim from the Red Book of Westmarch and therefore as authentically reliable as any text can be, regarding the events of its time.

      There are also various other documents -- lost tales, personal letters, and whatnot -- which are considered even less authoritative in the canon than the Silmarillion.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  12. Re:Hitchiker's guide to the galaxy series for sure by Catskul · · Score: 2, Informative

    RTFA... its freeking #1 on the list.

    --

    Im not here now... Im out KILLING pepperoni
  13. SurveyMonkey by daigu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You would have thought The Guardian could have sprung for the $19.95/month to get a thousand responses a month for a few months. Posting anything about 100 responses is weak. Anyone a subscriber to Surveymoney (or similar) and willing to post a more realistic survey?

    1. Re:SurveyMonkey by Jerf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Honestly, with the way online communities band together to stuff the results of polls like this, I'd kind of prefer something small like that. Despite the smaller sample size, it's probably a more fair one than you could get if you just threw it open for extended periods of time.

      Throw it out on the Internet and you're liable to "discover" that the Serenity novelization is the #1 geek book of all time.

      Reality and easy math (like "normal distributions") don't meet up all that often. A smaller, but more random, sample can be much better.

      (We're looking at "small but biased" vs "large but really biased", so I really do mean that "more" as a comparitive statement, not an absolute claim of validity of the original sample, so if you needed this parenthetical note, why not read more carefully? Also note the word "can".... it's not the same as "absolutely will".)

  14. Re:Hitchiker's guide to the galaxy series for sure by ip_fired · · Score: 1

    If you look at the list, it's at the top, in the #1 position :p.

    --
    Don't count your messages before they ACK.
  15. Bruce Sterling by mr.henry · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wah, no Bruce Sterling? But he has a powerbook and writes for Wired! Surely this is enough to be in the pantheon of geek writers! I am shocked and apalled.

    1. Re:Bruce Sterling by ir0b0t · · Score: 1

      That's what I noticed. Schismatrix is one of the best sci fi books ever. And he wrote Hacker Crackdown. Come on.

      Kurt Vonnegut would be on my list and . . . yes, the Baroque Cycle. That trilogy is the new Lord of the Rings but (wait for it . . . ) better.

      Okay, I just meant to say its different. The Baroque Cycle is just different from Lord of the Rings.

      --
      I'm laughing at clouds.
    2. Re:Bruce Sterling by Harry+Coin · · Score: 1

      I love Bruce Sterling's books, but as far as I'm concerned, owning a powerbook and writing for Wired are two really good reasons to exclude him from a geek list.

      Plus, the Illuminatus Trilogy is way too low in that list.

      --
      That's pre 7-11 thinking....
  16. Before there were geeks by Quirk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    E. Abbot's Flatland

    --
    "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
    Cohen
    1. Re:Before there were geeks by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      What he said.

    2. Re:Before there were geeks by julesh · · Score: 1

      I'll see your Abbot and raise you a Stewart. Flatterland.

    3. Re:Before there were geeks by Jivecat · · Score: 2, Informative

      RTFA: since 1932. Hence, no Verne either.

      --
      "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled."--Feynman
    4. Re:Before there were geeks by Digital+Vomit · · Score: 1
      Being a huge fan of Flatland, I bought Flatterland ("like Flatland, only moreso") when it came out in hardcover. It wasn't nearly as charming and as interesting as the original. The material is far heavier and the whole feminist rebellion theme (the main character is, as you might have guessed, female) is pretty played out in the twenty-first century. I had to force myself to finish it.

      If you're a fan of Flatland, I'd recommend checking out Sphereland, instead. It follows more closely to the flavor of the original and is more entertaining to read.

      Apparently there's also a Spaceland book, but I haven't heard much about it.

      I also remember reading a short story in a periodical about ten years back (Scientific American?) that described A. Square's escape from the prison he was placed in that the end of Flatland.

      --
      Modern copyright is theft of culture from everyone and it retards the progress of the useful arts and sciences.
  17. s/Stranger /Moon Is a Harsh Mistress/ by bcrowell · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Heinlein's The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress is a much better book than Stranger in a Strange Land. (Heinlein himself thought so.) He started working on Stranger back in the 40's, and didn't publish it for a long time --- partly because he thought the world wasn't ready for it, and partly because he wasn't sure how to execute it successfully. It's a less mature work that really doesn't show him at the peak of his powers. He succumbs to the temptation to have Jubal Harshaw act as the authorial mouthpiece all the time, and both the minor characters and the major ones are flat and unbelievable.

    The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress is in some ways a recap of the same idea: replace the human raised on Mars who doesn't understand normal humans with a newly sentient computer who doesn't understand normal humans. Although both are satires, Mistress is the more effective one, IMO, because it concentrates on satirizing one thing (republican government) rather than everything all at once. (And don't make the mistake of missing the satire in Mistress, as many people do. Life in the original penal colony as portrayed as a kind of anarchist utopia, whereas the revolution screws everything up by creating the evils of government.)

    1. Re:s/Stranger /Moon Is a Harsh Mistress/ by ickyellf · · Score: 1

      Heinlein was the OG* *Original Geek

      --
      There's no place like ~.
    2. Re:s/Stranger /Moon Is a Harsh Mistress/ by trurl7 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I must respectfully comment on a few of your claims. While I agree with you that Moon is a Harsh Mistress is a wonderful book, I find that your comments about it being "better" than Stranger in a Strange Land, and that Stranger is "a less mature work" to be a little bit...let's say highbrow. First - what are your qualifications in judging one work "less mature" than another? Second, you say Heinlein "succumbs" to the authorial mouthpiece temptation. Whether it is something that one "succumbs" to is, I feel, debatable, but let's consider this from a different angle:

      If Jubal is an "authorial mouthpiece", and this is bad, then please elaborate on the roles of Lazarus Long in Time Enough For Love (and almost any other novel he's in), Lt. Col Dubois in Starship Troopers, Prof. De La Paz in Moon is a Harsh Mistress, The Boss in Friday, the main character's friend (can't remember his name, he eventually becomes a major) in Revolt in 2100. The list goes on. In almost every serious book that Heinlein wrote (and many of the less-serious, pure fun ones), there is an older/mentor type character that is, effectively, the author's voice. Sometimes this function is distributed (consider Number of the Beast - which almost explicitly switches the authorial mouthpiece), it is sometimes absent initially, but then comes out at the end (e.g. Job: A Comedy of Justice, with the Devil being the mouthpiece). If you feel the "authorial mouthpiece" is a failing, I wonder how you regard the rest of Heinlein's work. And I emphasize - Prof. De La Paz is yet another "mouthpiece".

      Finally, I believe your thesis is confused. MIAHM is primarily a political work - it examines the moral and practical questions of political and ruling structures. SIASL is primarily a work on individual morality - one's relationship to oneself, his surroundings, and humanity in general. Likewise, Time Enough For Love examines aspects of morality in love and sexuality, and Starship Troopers examines an individual's responsibility to his country. I feel that they can not be compared in terms of which is a "better" book. I can acknowledge that we can discuss how polished, complete, or "mature" if you will, a work is. And in some sense, I do agree that Stranger is a bit rougher than Moon is a Harsh Mistress. But I hope you will agree that in discussing the works of such a great master, we should exhibit a bit more circumspection in our speech, rather than postulating blithely that A is a "much better book" than B.

    3. Re:s/Stranger /Moon Is a Harsh Mistress/ by kn0tw0rk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There should have been Starship Troopers - ok the movie adaptation was crap, but the book was so much better.

      --
      See my art -> http://herbevore.deviantart.com
    4. Re:s/Stranger /Moon Is a Harsh Mistress/ by BKX · · Score: 1

      No way dude. "Forever War" was so much better than "Starship Troopers". ("Forever War" was a response to "Starship Troopers".) I mean, it had unencumbered gay sex AND it followed the laws of physics. Especially because of the gay sex part.

    5. Re:s/Stranger /Moon Is a Harsh Mistress/ by michael_cain · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Especially since this is "geek novels". SIASL is a geek fantasy -- grow muscles by thinking them, beautiful women falling over themselves to have sex with you -- where TMIAHM's leading character is, well, a grown-up geek. I would be reluctant to lose either of my real arms but there have certainly been times when jobs would have been easier if I could just pop on the old "number three arm". Besides, the ending of SIASL was obvious and no one really dies. Two of the central characters don't make it in TMIAHM, a much more grown-up treatment.

    6. Re:s/Stranger /Moon Is a Harsh Mistress/ by surfdaddy · · Score: 1

      "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress" was the first missing book that came to my mind. I, like other posters, read "Stranger" after "Moon" (and after I had heard so many good things about "Stranger" and thought there was no comparison on the better book - it's "Moon"!

      The Moon is a Harsh Mistress was my favorite SF book of all time until I recently read "Ender's Game". Now those two are a tough choice, but "Ender" takes it.

      Given that it appears it was a web survey, it's not surprising that the results are probably more the result of a popularity contest than anything else.

    7. Re:s/Stranger /Moon Is a Harsh Mistress/ by Omestes · · Score: 1

      Ignoring the gay sex (if that was it I would just tell everyone to go read Poppy Z. Brite), the Forever series were wonderful books, the last one was kind of weak, but still decent.

      I know people are going to hate me, by why is Cryptonomicon on there? It is SO long, and SO boring, its like Stephenson got some Umberto Eco envy, but couldn't pull of Foucault's Pendulum.

      I also think that Illumantis! Trilogy should be on there, to keep the tinfoil hat crowd busy.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    8. Re:s/Stranger /Moon Is a Harsh Mistress/ by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Glory Road. It is less ambitious than either of those, but it's still better than 99.9% of the novels ever written. Damn, I love that book.

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
    9. Re:s/Stranger /Moon Is a Harsh Mistress/ by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      SIASL is primarily a work on individual morality - one's relationship to oneself, his surroundings, and humanity in general.

      These are not "Geeky" topics. I think Friday is a better fit for the Geek categorisation.

      Oh and getting back to your comment: Heinlin never reused the world from Stranger other than to slander his own work in The number of the beast. But the universe of "Moon Is a Harsh Mistress" popped up in The Cat who walks though walls, which for me means that the ideas in that book had more legs overall. I am not making any claims about "betterness" though.

    10. Re:s/Stranger /Moon Is a Harsh Mistress/ by felis_panthera · · Score: 1

      Besides, the ending of SIASL was obvious and no one really dies

      ummmm.... except for the main character, Michael, who gets blown into pieces by a shotgun wielding mob...

      --

      The chains are broken
      Loki is free
      Ragnarok is at hand...
    11. Re:s/Stranger /Moon Is a Harsh Mistress/ by maxume · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Re Jubal, you are pigeon-holeing his argument a bit. He doesn't say that there are no authorial mouthpieces in the other books, he says that Jubal is too loud and that this is to the detriment of the other characters, a point I would have to agree with.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    12. Re:s/Stranger /Moon Is a Harsh Mistress/ by dptalia · · Score: 1

      Thank you for expressing my opinions so clearly. Stranger in a Stange Land was interesting but it's didn't strech the mind in the ways Moon is a Harsh Mistress does.

      --
      Genius is one percent inspiration and 99 percent perspiration, which is why engineers sometimes smell really bad.
    13. Re:s/Stranger /Moon Is a Harsh Mistress/ by Cambo67 · · Score: 1

      > Ah! But they do! You have been remiss, and not read all his later books. IIRC, in Number of the Beast, various characters are 'saved' from their supposed grissly ends.

    14. Re:s/Stranger /Moon Is a Harsh Mistress/ by trurl7 · · Score: 1

      Well....if you want to talk connected universes here.... :-)

      Moon is a Harsh Mistress world becomes inducted (forcibly) into the main "Future History" world via it's connection to The Rolling Stones, where the little red-haired girl from MIAHM is now a grandmother. She then gets rejuvenated when Lazarus Long, using the "world machine" from Number of the Beast pops into that universe, and subsequently, as you point out, appears in The Cat Who Walks Through Walls (which is itself connected with Lazarus Long). Furthermore, I could be wrong, but I believe Jubal appears in The Cat also.

      Actually, using the "world machine", he pretty much ties almost all his major novels together (albeit sometimes tenuously: recall a very brief line in Time Enough For Love when Lazarus says something like "there was once a man whose brain was transplanted into a woman's body. He died, of course - rejection" referring to "I Will Fear No Evil"). Some of the worlds are not explicitly connected to Future History, but their histories are potentially compatible with it, especially considering the "six discoverers of the Moon" hypothesis (I think he explains this in Number of the Beast). Examples of this would be Door Into Summer, Double Star, Red Planet, Podkayne of Mars, etc.. Of the important, major worlds, I believe only Starship Troopers is completely incompatible with Future History. Of the minor stories, some are also not compatible, for instance Sixth Column would contradict the American Ayatollahs/Covenant thread and The Puppet Masters just does not fit in. Finally some of the minors appear totally unrelated, e.g. Glory Road, Tunnel In The Sky. However, a large section of the opus is, or becomes, connected via the Lazarus Long thread.

      And to address your other point, I believe issues of morality are certainly geek issues. For reference, I cite ESR's Jargon File. In "A Portrait of J. Random Hacker", in the section on "other interests" he mentions that some of the non-computer interests of geeks include linguistics, music, mathematics and ... philosophy. I would argue this further. I believe geeks are pretty much the only section of the population in which "being smart" is acceptible. This simply means we acknowledge our intelligence, and want to use it to satisfy our curiosity about the world. This frequently leads us to the hard sciences (math, chem, physics) and the natural modern extention of math is comp. sci. and hacking. (I'm not trying to be too technical here, just connecting trends). We reject dogmatic postulation, e.g. "this version of history is right because I said so", relying instead on logic and reason. Regretfully, modern (American) society seems to find this (i.e. logic, reason, thinking independantly) shocking, annoying and blameworthy, and we can see this in its treatment of "geeks". But really, all we are are just people who like to think and learn. And in this, more general sense, issues like morality, are quite relevant. Further, things like literature, art, music, all become relevant. Being a geek should not be restricted to "sitting 24/7 and hacking". It should be a way of becoming a greater human being. Hakkingu-do - The Way of the Hacker.

      Wow....that went really far afield. Sorry about that. Anyway, be smart, write good code, read good books. :-)

    15. Re:s/Stranger /Moon Is a Harsh Mistress/ by tendays · · Score: 1

      So that gives "Moon Is a Harsh Mistressin a Strange Land", right?
      (Either you are a geek or you are not)
      (Sorry couldn't help being a sed-nazi :-)

    16. Re:s/Stranger /Moon Is a Harsh Mistress/ by bcrowell · · Score: 1

      I believe Haldeman was quoted as saying that although he and Heinlein were both veterans, he thought the difference in attitude between these two well known SF books about war could be attributed to the fact that Haldeman had seen the horror of war at first hand, whereas Heinlein had served in peacetime (1929-34).

  18. True geeks... by John+Biggabooty · · Score: 1

    True geeks will not read these books until they are published online. Print is dead.

    --
    That's Bigboo TAY! TAY!
    1. Re:True geeks... by bersl2 · · Score: 1

      False. It's so much more satisfying to read something on paper. Easier on the eyes, too.

      Machine-readable is better for searching and light reading. Paper is better for heavy reading. The two formats complement each other.

    2. Re:True geeks... by Baddas · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      They need an automated at-home 'perfect binding' system to solve the problem of digital-to-paper, and an automated book scanner with decent OCR to solve the paper-to-digital problem.
      Only then can I be content.

      Ooh, or perhaps another way to solve my problem would be a roboticized bookshelving system. Ask for a book, put a book back in. No organizing needed.

    3. Re:True geeks... by Jeremi · · Score: 1
      False. It's so much more satisfying to read something on paper. Easier on the eyes, too


      Agreed, but I won't be really happy until we have electronic paper. Then I can just buy a single book and download new text into it as necessary, instead of having to buy new, separate, dedicated display hardware every time I want to read a new story. That will save me money, save trees, and make it possible for me to keep my entire book collection with me at all times.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    4. Re:True geeks... by bersl2 · · Score: 1

      And I would like electronic paper for note-taking and scheduling as well. Nothing quite fits the parameters yet. A PDA is too small, a tablet PC is too heavy, a laptop is too unwieldy, and none of them have the required battery life.

    5. Re:True geeks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Satisfying"? What, are the words different that way? While I agree modern displays have room for better performance, not everyone shares your cellulose fetish.

    6. Re:True geeks... by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      Yes, Yes they are.

      Pretty much anything can be improved by not hunching over a screen to do it.

      Being able to read on the couch, in a bus, in an aeroplane, in bed, or just about any environment I choose is far more satisfying that lugging a laptop around, worrying about power outlets and battery life, and squinting at a screen.

      Also, portability aside, there are other aspects that make reading a real book more satisying - there is the ability to flick backward and forward through the book at will - particularly in Fantasy novels where you want to flick to the front to look at the map, or the pronounciation guide, or even to just zone out and stare at the cover for a while....
      Then when you're done, you can put it up on your shelf along with the rest of them - a house full of books is a wonderful thing.
      It's a far better feeling standing and staring a a full bookshelf deciding what to read next, than simply browsing a list on a screen.

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
  19. Summary of Comments by NilObject · · Score: 5, Funny
    Let me save us all a great deal of time and summarize the oncoming flood of comments:

    My literary preferences are better than yours!
    1. Re:Summary of Comments by screwballicus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My literary preferences are better than yours!

      Actually, I'd argue this is the last place on earth (or elsewhere in the universe) you'd expect to find arguments precisely to that effect.

      The thing is, many of the great works in this so-called geek canon aren't chiefly admired for their literary qualities at all. If there's anything that serves as the basis for self-important pretentiousness in geek reading preference, it's a bias favouring substance over form and ideas over aesthetics. The theoretical or philosophical over the literary or poetical, if it has to be one or the other.

      There's many an Asimov fan who while holding up 'hard sci-fi' as the true geek literature, will quite readily admit that Asimov isn't a great fiction writer, considered amongst the elite of great fiction writers in general. He's a great thinker who conceived his ideas in fiction writing, not a great fiction writer who happened upon some interesting observations while he went about the business of crafting masterful narrative and perfecting the storytelling art.

      There is of course in stark contrast to this 'hard sci-fi' preference a large demographic who proudly declare their love for imaginative fantasy written mostly for the sake of telling a story and immersing the reader in an impossible universe of the author's conception. But so far in history, this has been a preference declared in defiance of respectable preference more often than in celebration of it, despite the tremendously widespread popularity of fantasy writing in general.

    2. Re:Summary of Comments by value_added · · Score: 1

      The thing is, many of the great works in this so-called geek canon aren't chiefly admired for their literary qualities at all. If there's anything that serves as the basis for self-important pretentiousness in geek reading preference, it's a bias favouring substance over form and ideas over aesthetics.

      Well said. Something similar, I think, can be said for fiction writers like Grisham, King, Clancy et al whose names regularly appear on bestseller lists and, despite their obvious talent for story telling, offer up remarkably undistinguished fare not unlike the ardent scribblings of a semi-talented student in a high school English class.

      That said, I do believe Douglas Adams deserves special recognition for his contributions to the narrative form. A Trilogy published in five books is undoubtedly a literary first.

    3. Re:Summary of Comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's hard to keep your readers' attention, maybe it would be better used elsewhere. Who decided that better telling of a story and luring readers into interest in a character is more like "literature", while creating a better story to tell and inherently interesting characters is not? Why are mainstream fiction authors admired for techniques that try to solve problems they created for themselves?

    4. Re:Summary of Comments by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      I would argue that Asimov writes at a higher reading level, yet is a better author (as in writes better prose) than the majority of authors.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    5. Re:Summary of Comments by DarkClown · · Score: 1

      Mod -1 post starts with the word 'actually'

    6. Re:Summary of Comments by screwballicus · · Score: 1

      Mod -1 post starts with the word 'actually'

      I wholeheartedly endore such a moderation. That word's horribly overused, and I well deserve to be chastised for having started a post with it.

  20. chronicles of narnia by Odocoileus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Where many young geeks got their start.

    --
    ...
    1. Re:chronicles of narnia by bersl2 · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't call it exclusively or even primarily "geek", but I do agree that it's good. Seven of the eight "independent reading" books required of me in the fourth grade were the Chronicles.

    2. Re:chronicles of narnia by vidarh · · Score: 1

      Too much religion (that is, retelling of the Bible) for my liking..

    3. Re:chronicles of narnia by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      Too much religion (that is, retelling of the Bible) for my liking.

      Are the Chronicles of Narnia religious? Undoubtedly.
      Are they Christian? Well, only if you want to read them that way.

      Reading the stories as a kid at Catholic primary school, the Christian interpretation was extremely obvious. But that's a matter of context. Aslan is undoubtedly God, but is he necessarily Christ? A strong argument could be made that he is Apollo, the Sun-God, the Summer; he rises from the East, and brings warmth and light with him, driving away the Witch's winter. Once he turns up, the place is suddenly full of characters and creatures from Graeco-Roman paganism, including Bacchus himself with his full retinue.

      The traditional Christian world is one in which God created Man in his own image, and exalts him, giving him dominion over the world and all the other animals in it. Could Narnia be any more different? Here God is a Lion, and Man was not even a part of the original Creation; when we first arrive in Narnia, humans are so rare that the Witch is amazed to meet one, and wonders if Edmund might be some overgrown Dwarf who has shaved off his beard.

      To me, the saga feels like the author is trying desperately to Christianise his story, but that he knows deep down that it is pagan, pure and ancient...

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    4. Re:chronicles of narnia by foreverdisillusioned · · Score: 1

      Aslan is tied down and sacrificed for someone else's sins. In The Last Battle, Tash the anti-Aslan is introduced. So yes, I would say that Aslan is definitely Christ.

    5. Re:chronicles of narnia by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      Aslan is tied down and sacrificed for someone else's sins. In The Last Battle, Tash the anti-Aslan is introduced. So yes, I would say that Aslan is definitely Christ.

      The concept of blood sacrifice as atonement for transgressions is far, far older than Christianity - as I understand Christian theology, the whole point of the Passion was that the death of the Son of God was so colossal as to atone for all sins, ending the necessity for further blood sacrifices as appeasement. As for Tash - again, the dualism between incarnations of good and evil predates Christ.

      Certainly the Chronicles can be read as a Christian story. As I understand it, that was also what Lewis intended. But the Christian motifs Lewis used were mostly ones that also existed in older beliefs. Thus it is, as I mentioned above, equally reasonable to identify Aslan with the sun god.

      After all, if Narnia is such a Christian place, just what are Bacchus and the Maenads doing there? Euan, euan, euoi-oi-oi!

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  21. Rant by viksit · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Usual rant about Tolkien and Clarke. But are we seeing only Sci Fi type novels here? I thought a lot of people would've loved stuff like Robert Heinlein, and Philip K. Dick's books. The moon is a harsh mistress, and Riverworld are amazing books.. And who in the world voted AGAINST the king of cyberpunk - Neuromancer?!

    --
    If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...oh, wait a minute - he already does.
    1. Re:Rant by mrbooze · · Score: 1

      Probably people like me who believe that William Gibson is one of the most overrated hacks in the genre.

    2. Re:Rant by StarvingSE · · Score: 1

      I am glad to see Philip K. Dick on the list, although I must admit that I enjoy his short stories more than his novels.

      It is true geek since, whenever I mention him as one of my favorite authors, I get blank stares and a "who?" Then I say Minority Report and they all go "oooooh that was a book?"

      Can't wait until A Scanner Darkly comes out on film!

      --
      I got nothin'
    3. Re:Rant by The+Nine · · Score: 1

      Blasphemy!

    4. Re:Rant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And who in the world voted AGAINST the king of cyberpunk - Neuromancer?!

      I do. It's one of the worst cyberpunk books I've read. Seriously. It's boring, it's fatally flawed when it comes to technology ("Black Ice" ?!) And so forth.

      The book is ruined the minute you know too much about computers. It may be "cool", but it sure as hell isn't anywhere near realistic. If you want good cyberpunk, read "the shockwave rider".

    5. Re:Rant by vidarh · · Score: 1

      Overrated, probably. But I still like his books. More so his "recent" books, like Idoru and All tomorrows parties, actually. He's had far too much to live up to with all the early 90's hype in particular.. I remember reading alt.cyberpunk and actually being put off from reading any Gibson for years because of the fanboy like worship going on... Except for Agrippa - hard to avoid given all the hype around it's release, but of course that was quite "different" from his novels. More performance art than literature, I guess...

    6. Re:Rant by Gulthek · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Because Gibson's writing is crap on a page, his plots are paper thin, his characters are 2d, and his technological ideas are boring. See: hack.

  22. "I, Robot" not a novel by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "I, Robot" was not a novel. It was a collection of short stories.

    1. Re:"I, Robot" not a novel by hobbitofthenorth · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was thinking the same thing. The movie is actually closer to "Caves Of Steel" by Asimov. (i.e. murder, detective, robot etc. etc. etc.)

    2. Re:"I, Robot" not a novel by stox · · Score: 1

      Actually, "I, Robot" was a short story. The name was reused for the anthology.

      --
      "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
    3. Re:"I, Robot" not a novel by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      Yes, I rather liked the use of the storyline... I was rather enjoying it up until the Hollywood ending.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    4. Re:"I, Robot" not a novel by Canordis · · Score: 1

      I, Robot, is the title of the collection of short stories that included the novella "I, Robot" which is long enough to qualify as a novel.

      --
      I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: "O Lord, make my enemies ridiculous." And God granted it.
    5. Re:"I, Robot" not a novel by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 2, Informative
      I, Robot, is the title of the collection of short stories that included the novella "I, Robot" which is long enough to qualify as a novel.

      Actually, there was no story named "I, Robot" in "I, Robot". The stories in "I, Robot" were:

      • Robbie
      • Runaround
      • Reason
      • Catch that Rabbit
      • Liar!
      • Little Lost Robot
      • Escape!
      • Evidence
      • The Evitable Conflict

      There is a story named "I, Robot", but it is not an Asimov story. It was written by Eando Binder and published in 1939.

    6. Re:"I, Robot" not a novel by Cryptnotic · · Score: 1

      Maybe they're referring to the novelization of the movie starring Will Smith.

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    7. Re:"I, Robot" not a novel by icybee · · Score: 1

      Strictly speaking, neither was Foundation. It was also an anthology of short stories that had been previously published in magazines, with a new introduction & a few interlinking bits.

      The best Asimov novel, IMHO, is "The Gods Themselves".

    8. Re:"I, Robot" not a novel by icybee · · Score: 1
      "I, Robot" was a short story, but not one by Asimov.

      From asimovonline.com...

      Asimov did not come up with the title, but rather his publisher "appropriated" the title from a short story by Eando Binder that was published in 1939.
    9. Re:"I, Robot" not a novel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only...

  23. top 20 is a little vague by hobbitofthenorth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wish people would be more specific in asking for the best "geek" novels. Is it really fair to compare early, groundbreaking cyberpunk like SnowCrash with fantasy genre stuff like LOTR? Don't get me wrong, I'm a fan of both, but how can you expect them to end up on the same list?

  24. "books by rating" at iblist by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is not quite the same thing, but iblist maintains a list of top books by rating. Geeks are disproportionally represented in their user base, so this is a not entirely unlike a "favorite geek books" list.

    1. Re:"books by rating" at iblist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh... the iblist users have Robin Hobb's Assassin's Apprentice #17 all time. I don't know whether to laugh or cry. She may be a local author and she may write amusing fantasy, but she's as deep as a puddle.

    2. Re:"books by rating" at iblist by masklinn · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that that frigging Fitz fucking blows.

      The best thing that could've happened to these books would have been for the old man (Fitz' grandfather?) to drop him on the pavement and crush his head flat within 10 pages of the opening cover.

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
  25. V for Vendetta by farker+haiku · · Score: 1

    V for Vendetta, which is apparently coming out as a movie, is a great graphic novel. So while it's not a novel per se, it's hard to beat the geek factor of it being a graphic novel.

    --
    Your sig(k) has been stolen. There is a puff of smoke!
    1. Re:V for Vendetta by farker+haiku · · Score: 1

      oh and V for Vendetta was written by one of the guys who made it onto their list. Alan Moore just kicks ass as a writer.

      --
      Your sig(k) has been stolen. There is a puff of smoke!
  26. Ender's Game? by PipOC · · Score: 1

    ...It's top 10 at the very least.

  27. Another glaring omission by PFritz21 · · Score: 1
  28. Its got to be.... by woja · · Score: 0

    Running Weblogs with Slash. ISBN: 0596001002 You wouldnt be reading my *bullshit* if the origins of that book werent written.. right?

  29. Iain M. Banks by F34nor · · Score: 1

    The culture novels own.

    I am sad to see Vernor Vinge missing from the list. I really liked "A Fire Upon the Deep" pack mind network topography was great.

    1. Re:Iain M. Banks by nogginthenog · · Score: 1

      Couldn't agree more. I only recently discovered Banks. Amazing stuff. Hadn't read such an 'addictive' novel for ages.

    2. Re:Iain M. Banks by PeterBrett · · Score: 1

      I would have voted for Excession rather than Consider Phlebas as a geek-friendly novel, though.

      I strongly recommend The Algebraist, though, if you haven't read it already.

    3. Re:Iain M. Banks by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      I would have preferred to see Feersum Endjin in place of Consider Phlebas because whilst both of them are great books I think Feersum Endjin is an amazingly great book.

    4. Re:Iain M. Banks by F34nor · · Score: 1

      Interesting note. Feersum Endjin is the same as Arthur C. Clark's "The City and the Stars" the story of the jackasses who stayed behind.

  30. Make Room! Make Room! by Yaa+101 · · Score: 1

    aka Soylent Green.

    Make Room! Make Room!

  31. What? No "Iliad"? No "Oddysey"? by ian_mackereth · · Score: 1

    ohh... geek novels... I thought they said Greek novels.

  32. Yeah, seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ender's Game has to be the ultimate geek novel. I've read almost all of the books in TFA's Greatest Hits list, but Ender's Game beats them all.

  33. Dupe by Thieflar · · Score: 1

    It seems like only a few days ago that I saw this on the front page of Slashdot. Boy, I had forgotten that #11 on the list was Snow Crash by Neal Stephenson. Fortunately, Zonk was here to refresh my memory!

  34. No Heinlein? by Animats · · Score: 1, Funny

    No Heinlein. No George O. Smith. Neil Stephenson is overrepresented. "Dune" really isn't that good. Especially since we all now have a much better idea how wars in deserts really go.

  35. where are the old masters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    H.G. Wells, Jules Verne, C.S. Lewis, men who had command of the English language as well as futuristic imaginations. Robert Louis Stevenson's "The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde" also falls in that category.

    More recently, there's J.G. Ballard's "High Rise", which is sadly out of print. But you can buy a used copy through Amazon's seller network for an arm and a leg.

    1. Re:where are the old masters... by Chr0me · · Score: 0

      Mostly writing before 1932.

    2. Re:where are the old masters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My bad... I was never very good at reading instructions.

    3. Re:where are the old masters... by masklinn · · Score: 1
      H.G. Wells, Jules Verne, C.S. Lewis, men who had command of the English language as well as futuristic imaginations.

      Although delighted that so many english speakers know of him, I'm just about sure that he never wrote a single word of english in his lifetime. And the first english translations sucked. Badly. Never before 1965 (he died in 1905) did he actually get english translations worthy of his works.

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
  36. Start Neal Stephenson by Comatose51 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I just started Cryptonomicon recently and was persuaded to do so after reading this Wikipedia article. It's incredible. Bruce Schneier invented a crypto system based on playing cards for the novel. It's this depth that I find so fascinating with Stephenson. It may be fiction but there's a great deal of fact/truth underneath.

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
    1. Re:Start Neal Stephenson by JeremyALogan · · Score: 1

      Recommendation: read everything you can get your hand on by Stephenson... except The Baroque Cycle... I got half way into the second one and wondered why I was still reading. Interesting, but painful.

      I do agree though... Cryptonomicon is one of my all time favorite books.

    2. Re:Start Neal Stephenson by don.g · · Score: 1

      Halfway through the *second* book? I gave up halfway through Quicksilver. But his earlier stuff is good.

      If you like his stuff, chances are you'll like Bruce Sterling too. And William Gibson -- his later stuff's better, though.

      --
      Pretend that something especially witty is here. Thanks.
    3. Re:Start Neal Stephenson by xpatiate · · Score: 1
      It's this depth that I find so fascinating with Stephenson. It may be fiction but there's a great deal of fact/truth underneath.
      Yeah, absolutely. I'm just heading into the home straight of Cryptonomicon right now (can't believe it took me this long to get around to reading it) and pretty much every page has a) made me laugh and b) made me learn something. Which is not to say I was always necessarily thrilled to be learning all this stuff - the several-page digression into Greek mythology was a bit of a struggle - but the healthy applications of dry wit makes it entertaining rather than didactic.
      --
      (music + neurology) * fiction = feedback
    4. Re:Start Neal Stephenson by HardCase · · Score: 1

      I enjoyed Neal Stephenson's early work, but after he discovered the wonders of the thesaurus, I really lost interest.

      "The Big U". Absolutely hilarious.

      -h-

    5. Re:Start Neal Stephenson by The+Nine · · Score: 1

      the several-page digression into Greek mythology was a bit of a struggle

      Yikes, does this guy make a habit of those? Snow Crash is the only Stephenson book I've read so far, and I enjoyed it with the exception of the multiple several-page digressions into bloody Sumerian-or-whatever-it-was mythology. Have been meaning to read Cryptonomicon for a while. A little put off by the prospect of having to battle through more boring mythology. :s

    6. Re:Start Neal Stephenson by Mathinker · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Bruce Schneier invented a crypto system based on playing cards for the novel."

      Ah, yes, Solitaire. Not that I really believe you're going to use it, but FYI, it's broken.

      It's not by chance, either. Paul Crowley, the guy who broke Solitaire, also tried to invent a strong manual encryption algorithm and failed.

      Not that I'm in the league of those guys, but I've been working on the problem myself and it's not easy.

    7. Re:Start Neal Stephenson by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      I plowed about halfway through Cryptonomicon, then put it down and haven't got around to picking it up again. Fascinating stuff indeed, but it was really starting to cry out for a good firm editor. Someday I'll get around to picking it up again, but I'm currently not to excited by the prospect.

      Am I the only one who feels this way about this book?

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    8. Re:Start Neal Stephenson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's exactly the way i felt about Cryptonomicon.
      Half way through the book i lost interest in it.
      Way too much chitchat and what not.

    9. Re:Start Neal Stephenson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sorry but neal stephenson is a terrible writer;
      snow crash is absolute utter garbage, most of his phrasing is utterly nonsensical, and his interpertation of sumerian is plain retarded.

    10. Re:Start Neal Stephenson by RobinH · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm into Cryptonomicon right now, and was laughing quite a bit where he was explaining how Waterhouse (of the 40's) was using a mathematical model to explain his horniness (rho) and the model was becoming very complicated with the introduction of Mary Smith. That's the ultimate geek chapter right there.

      I was going to recommend this book to some friends/family, but I realized that it's definitely only suitable for geeks.

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    11. Re:Start Neal Stephenson by Illissius · · Score: 1

      Tastes vary, indeed.
      I absolutely loved Snow Crash -- and while I didn't dislike Cryptonomicon, I only really enjoyed the parts around that very same - unfortunately short - digression into Greek mythology.

      --
      Work is punishment for failing to procrastinate effectively.
  37. Agreed by everphilski · · Score: 1

    In complete agreement. I read The moon is a harsh Mistress first, and my friends told me to read Stranger in a Strange Land, I was disappointed.

    -everphilski-

  38. Let's make this more interesting... by greginnj · · Score: 1

    Look, we're all discussing Science Fiction, or whatever you want to call it. While it's true that lots of geeks love SF, I would argue that not all great SF novels are "geek novels". (Otherwise let's just make it a list of great SF novels and forget the 'geek' qualifier).

    Ferinstance: Heinlein's characters weren't geeks, and he wasn't a geek himself. Stephenson, on the other hand, fits the bill, and whoever mentioned DFW's Infinite Jest is getting at what I'm getting at. Forget about whether it's great SF, where are the great Geek Characters?

    Now that I've broadened the definition, I give you my nominee:

    Kingsley Amis' Lucky Jim.

    Face it, a few decades later, and Jim would have been a programmer.

    --
    Read the best of all of Slash: seenonslash.com
    1. Re:Let's make this more interesting... by xpatiate · · Score: 1

      I nominate Milo from The Phantom Tollbooth (surely an influential proto-geek novel) for these entirely superficial reasons:
              - he was skinny and wore glasses
              - he had no friends (well, not real ones)
              - he got to play with cool technology like The Great Chromo's wand
              - he bamboozled a Mathemagician

      --
      (music + neurology) * fiction = feedback
  39. HP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How did Harry Potter not make this list?

  40. Vurt by scowling · · Score: 1

    Notably missing from the list is Vurt, by Jeff Noon. It is perhaps the most sociologically aware of the cyberpunk novels if the 80s and 90s.

    --
    www.kitchengeek.com -- Nosh for
    1. Re:Vurt by scotch · · Score: 1

      Seconded - I've read "Vurt" and "Pixel Juice", so far. If you haven't read Vurt or any other Jeff Noon stuff, do your self a favor and give it a try. Definitely some wacky shit. Not for everyone, naturally.

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    2. Re:Vurt by Omestes · · Score: 1

      Yes! The whole series! Vurt, Pollen, Nymphomation (and some of the stories about Hobart in Pixel Juice). I'd also recommend Automated Alice, awesome geekified modern retelling of Alice in Wonderland. Hard to find any of his work Stateside, sadly. I don't think his newest novel is available here yet, and I don't think Amazon.co.uk ships here, sadly.

      I wouldn't call it cyberpunk, I'd call it FEATHERpunk.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    3. Re:Vurt by iainl · · Score: 1

      Everyone who reads Vurt loves it (I simply adore just about everything Noon has done, mind you), but it seems nowhere near enough people have actually done so to achieve a list placing.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  41. What?! A geek list with no Tolkien? by Fractal+Dice · · Score: 2, Funny

    One root to rule them,
    One grep to find them,
    One cron to bring them all,
    And in the subnet bind them.

  42. Brunner's Shockwave Rider by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 2, Informative

    Brunner's Shockwave Rider should be there, as should be the Adolescence of P-1.
    -russ

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    1. Re:Brunner's Shockwave Rider by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      Let me reccomend two "lesser" Brunner novels: 'The Stardroppers', and 'The Stone that Never Came Down'. Both are fairly short, tight works, and both involve an invention that starts off looking like it might be a very bad thing, twists in early mid-book, then twists a few more times to become something much bigger (and maybe better) by the end. Stone also has much the same feeling of ever-prescient (or at least perpetual) commentary on the human condition running along behind the surface plot as 'The Prisoner' TV show or Bradbury's 'Fahrenheit-451'.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    2. Re:Brunner's Shockwave Rider by bensafrickingenius · · Score: 1

      I read The Adolescence of P-1 when I was 12 years old, by accident. It was in this big discount bin, and it was one of the few books I could afford. I had no special interest in computers at the time, I just needed something to read. It changed my life.

      --
      I am not left-handed, either!
    3. Re:Brunner's Shockwave Rider by TRS80NT · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yup, and even more deserving, IMO, "Stand on Zanzibar" and "The Sheep Look Up" even as both come true a little bit each day.
      What are terrorists if not muckers?


      --
      Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.
    4. Re:Brunner's Shockwave Rider by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

      There's a whole theory about how the original Internet Worm of 1988 survived, hid, and is now responsible for the huge growth of the Internet. Ool-cay it-ay.
      -russ

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  43. Roger Zelazny by farker+haiku · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The Amber Chronicles. That is all. If you haven't read it, do so.

    --
    Your sig(k) has been stolen. There is a puff of smoke!
    1. Re:Roger Zelazny by xScruffx · · Score: 1

      While I did greatly enjoy the Chronicles of Amber (even the three new books, aside from the poor editors, weren't bad), I'd suggest Donnerjack over the Amber series in so much as it deals with far geekier subject matter.

    2. Re:Roger Zelazny by lilmouse · · Score: 1

      I've read a little of the Amber novels, and I can't say they appealed to me much. But then, I've never finished any of the series, only finished some short stories. Still and all, the main characters seem pretty obnoxious, even the most likable ones. Maybe I haven't read enuf ;-)

      --LWM

  44. Geek Books? by the+ghetto+jedi · · Score: 1

    I've only read one... 1984 by Orwell. Great book.

  45. No Umberto Eco?? by jedZ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Foccault's pendulum should definitely be in any top 10 list worth the name

    1. Re:No Umberto Eco?? by gcatullus · · Score: 1

      Eco appeals to the word geek more than the standard geek. That being said, all of his writtings, from the light stuff, to the literary, to the essays on linguistics are good reads and should appeal to anyone who loves intelligent thought. I actually made a bit of a pilgrimage to the museum in Paris, some 15 years ago, just to see the "actual" pendulum.

    2. Re:No Umberto Eco?? by lilmouse · · Score: 1

      I don't think he's that widely read. I guess the vote that the Pendulum would've gotten went to the Illuminatus Trilogy. Very very good work, tho - more geeks *should* read him, if they haven't yet.

      --LWM

    3. Re:No Umberto Eco?? by handslikesnakes · · Score: 1

      Look on the bright side, at least it didn't have Dan Brown.

  46. crichton by colton+cummings · · Score: 1

    The Andromeda Strain, or a lot of other books by Michael Crichton.

    --
    XaNk: now I remember why I hated the girls in high school
    XaNk: because none of them would talk to me
    1. Re:crichton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that his books suffer from his own anti-science agenda, and his ignorance of all things scientific.
      For a medical doctor he shows a surprising lack of knowledge of science in general, and the scientific technique. His lack of biochemical knowledge in particular is highly surprising... and embarassing. And yes, I am a biochemist.

  47. Where's Cory Doctorow? by bensafrickingenius · · Score: 1

    OK, ok. I'll give them a couple more years before I insist. But, believe me, he's going to make the list someday soon! Check out his ebooks at www.craphound.com. My favorite is "OwnzOred," which is actually a short story in "A Place so Foreign and 8 more."

    --
    I am not left-handed, either!
  48. Good book overlooked by Geeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A *great* geek book that is often overlooked by Geeks because it is not SciFi is "The Power of One" by Bryce Courtenay. I don't have time to write a full review of it, but perhaps someone else here who has read it could?

  49. Not bad as top 10 lists go... by H0p313ss · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've read 8 of the first 10 but only two of 11 - 20. Since I've been reading S.F. for 25 years I find that a little odd.

    What would I add? Off the top of my head:

    1. Utopia - Thomas More
    2. News From Nowhere - William Morris
    3. Startide Rising - David Brin
    4. A Fire Upon the Deep - Vernor Vinge
    5. Ender's Game - Orson Scott Card
    6. Little Fuzzy - H. Beam Piper
    7. The Dispossessed - Ursula K. Leguin
    8. The Moon is a Harsh Mistress - Robert A. Heinlein
    9. Ringworld - Larry Niven
    10. To Your Scattered Bodies Go - Philip Jose Farmer
    11. Inherit the Stars - James P. Hogan
    And what about Tolkien? Can't have a geek list without a Hobbit or an Elf getting in the way!
    --
    XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    1. Re:Not bad as top 10 lists go... by fLameDogg · · Score: 1

      I'm glad someone mentioned Little Fuzzy and Piper. :O)

      --
      fD
    2. Re:Not bad as top 10 lists go... by BJH · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... of the list, I've read 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, probably 7 (a long time ago), maybe 9, some of 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, some of 15 (thought MiaHM was better and gave up halfway through), 17, 18, and probably 20.
      Of your list, I've read 3, 4, 5, maybe 6?, 8, 9, 10, and maybe 11.
      I tend to lose track of what I read when I was a teenager (too long ago), so my memories of the older books aren't as reliable as those of, say, Neal Stephenson.

      That said, I find that a lot of the books on this list don't succeed as novels so much as illustrations of a particular concept that the author wanted to write about. Also, reading stuff like this has permanently put me off Orson Scott Card.

    3. Re:Not bad as top 10 lists go... by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      Well... my favorite Piper book was Uller Uprising... but don't tell anyone.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    4. Re:Not bad as top 10 lists go... by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      I was a bit surprised to not see Necroscope by Brian Lumley on the list. Harry's only powers are talking with the dead and understanding Mobius Math.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    5. Re:Not bad as top 10 lists go... by Morgalyn · · Score: 1

      Since I agree with your inclusions which I /have/ read, I will use the rest of your list as a reading list for the next year. Is your list ordered? #s 3, 4, and 5 all have happy places on my shelves when I'm not loaning them out... Together I think they make a good assay into science fiction as social commentary.

      --
      You say you got a real solution
      Well, you know
      We'd all love to see the plan
      (The Beatles)
    6. Re:Not bad as top 10 lists go... by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      A fellow Piper fan? Where have you been all my life?

      :-)

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
  50. Where are the hard core geek scifi titles? by captn+ecks · · Score: 1

    What about the hard scifi writers like Greg Egan and Ken MacLeod? These authors present great reads about speculative science, cosmology, futurist ideas, singuarity consequences, social change, what it means to be human, etc. Just try and use this stuff as a casual conversation starter. Perfect geek talk to maintain isolation at a party! Should be on the list.

  51. Uber Geek by stox · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "The Adolescence of P1" by Thomas Ryan

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
  52. How About Best Geek History Books... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Is there list of the best geek history books?

    I'm currently reading "Insanely Great: The Life and Times of Macintosh, the Computer That Changed Everything" by Steven Levy. I recently read "Hackers" by Steven Levy and "The Second Coming of Steve Jobs" by Alan Deutschman. This is more or less in preparation for my first Macworld conference in January.

    You know you're getting old when books you read years ago as teenager are now Penguin Classics with the orange spine. :P

    1. Re:How About Best Geek History Books... by zaren · · Score: 1

      I was going to suggest Levy books, but it's nice to see someone beat me to them :) Elsewise in the history section, I would highly recommend "Where Wizards Stay Up Late" by Katie Hafner. It's a history of the foundation of the Internet - and I'm not talking about the Web and AOL, I'm talking about MIT and BBN and DARPA and 56k *backbones*. Very good read.

      --
      Come to the University of Mars! Classes starting soon!
    2. Re:How About Best Geek History Books... by phillymjs · · Score: 1

      Here are some selections from my shelves:

      Fire in the Valley, by Frieberger & Swaine
      Accidental Empires, by Cringely
      Hard Drive: Bill Gates and the Making of the Microsoft Empire, by Wallace & Erickson
      Dealers of Lightning: Xerox PARC and the Dawn of the Computer Age, by Hiltzik
      Fumbling the Future: How Xerox Invented, Then Ignored, the First Personal Computer, by Smith & Alexander

      ~Philly

    3. Re:How About Best Geek History Books... by Vellmont · · Score: 1

      The best I've read is The Double Helix by James Watson, co-discoverer of the structure of DNA. It's probbably the best account of how actual science is done (the blind alleys, the competitiveness, etc) ever written. The Cukoos Egg by Cliff Stoll is another great book about tracking down Soviet spies (albiet ameturish ones) that hacked into Cliff's computer through arpanet. The Making Of the Atomic Bomb by Richard Rhodes is another great book. It chronicles much of the project. Anyone know any great books on the history of computing?

      --
      AccountKiller
    4. Re:How About Best Geek History Books... by lorelorn · · Score: 1
      When I think of geek history books, I don't think about biographies of people still with us today.

      "A Short History of Nearly Everything" takes us from the development of scientific disciplines in Victorian times through to today.

      "Longitude" talks about how geeks tried solutions both mechanical and astronomical to solve what in their day was seen as an insoluble problem.

      "Quicksliver" is the start of a series that covers the late 17th and early 18th centuries and is kind of an 'origins' story for geeks, and much else.

      These books are by Bill Bryson, Dava Sobel, and Neal Stephenson respectively and I would recommend them all.

    5. Re:How About Best Geek History Books... by Winlin · · Score: 1

      The Hacker Crackdown by Bruce Sterling for a nice look at the underground BBS culture in the late 80s to early 90s, and a healthy dose of pre-Patriot Act law enforcement tactics against 'hackers.'

  53. Am I the only one? by rahultyagi · · Score: 1

    Am I the only geek around who loves Contact? I mean, its not nearly as geeky as H2G2 but I thought it was great nevertheless. One of the better science fiction books around.

    1. Re:Am I the only one? by iamelgringo000 · · Score: 1

      Yes

  54. Where's the love for Asimov? by mortong · · Score: 1

    I, Robot is a good book, but where are some of the other key Asimov books? The Foundation series should definately be up there - I mean, come one, it was his writing that helped make sci fi what it is today.

    1. Re:Where's the love for Asimov? by PresidentEnder · · Score: 1
      8. Foundation -- Isaac Asimov 47% (47)

      Seems to me that Foundation is on the list. I'd put it higher, myself, but it's there.

      --
      I used to carry a bottle of whiskey for snake bite. And two snakes. -Nefarious Wheel
    2. Re:Where's the love for Asimov? by mortong · · Score: 1

      And with that, this blind guy is heading to bed.

    3. Re:Where's the love for Asimov? by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      You see #8? Sure, they don't have the books individually listed, but...

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  55. 1984 and Brave New World are Geek books ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't get me wrong, 1984 and Brave New World are probably MY two books. I read them both several times and they had a profound impact on me. Problem is, I don't view them as geek books. Am I the only one who think that?

  56. Good Omens by ZahrGnosis · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm glad someone mentioned "Good Omens". For anyone who has heard of Neil Gaiman OR Terry Pratchett and hasn't read this book: you're really missing something. It happens that my favorite author for a while was Pratchett, and a good friend of mine was into Gaiman... we recommended the book to each other with serendipitous timing, and it's been a favorite ever since. Highly recommended.

    1. Re:Good Omens by TrentL · · Score: 1

      I'm usually skeptical of novels with 2 authors, but maybe I'll check this one out.

    2. Re:Good Omens by lammi · · Score: 1

      As the good friend who liked Gaiman's work referenced in the parent I most certainly agree that this is a book to check out.

      Talk about a weird Monday morning. I'm innocently reading the slashdot comments when I come across one that matches exactly a conversation a buddy and I had. While I'm thinking "that's weird" I look up at the poster name to see that it is my friend. What a small digital world.

    3. Re:Good Omens by ginbot462 · · Score: 1

      This is one of my all time favorite books. It's got that British sense of humor(humour?) ... and well, I don't want to give away the ending. Damnit just read it!

      --
      Atlas Shrugged : Thematic Story :: Battlefield Earth : Organized Religion
  57. Catcher in the Rye by frankmu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    given this is Slashdot, i am surprised that this wasn't mentioned yet. of course my tin-foil hat is at the cleaners right now. better go now.

    --
    Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
    1. Re:Catcher in the Rye by Omestes · · Score: 1

      Not geeky enough.

      I was hoping for Illuminatus!
      Lem's Memoir Found in a Bathtub.
      Or of course The Crying of Lot 49.

      (I personally was hoping for Vurt, by Jeff Noon, but no one likes him)

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    2. Re:Catcher in the Rye by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      Illuminatus! did make the list, 19th place. I had expected it to score higher. I was also kind of expecting Godel, Escher, Bach, even though this was strictly about novels.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    3. Re:Catcher in the Rye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      of course my tin-foil hat is at the cleaners right now

      If you're trying to hype the conspiracy angle, there's only one book that keeps up with current events: Catch 22.

    4. Re:Catcher in the Rye by Omestes · · Score: 1

      Someone really needs to make a full geek-reading list, with a decent poll size, and a decent amount people replying.

      I'd say we either remove, or put O'Reilly in another catagory. Same thing with other tech manuals. I think my big Unix admin book is essential geek reading, but essential more in the fact that many people work with it, just like "Corn Plucking for Dummies" might be an essential farmer read, while we all know they read Kant for fun.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
  58. yes and no on Small Gods by aendeuryu · · Score: 1

    Small Gods is a fantastic book, but it's so good that it can't be relegated to a strictly defined audience like geeks. It's one of the greatest satirical takes on religion that there is. Every time I hear people say that Dogma was a good satire about religion I shudder, just because I think about Small Gods and how satire is supposed to be.

  59. Should've been Top 8 or Top 16 ... by rewinn · · Score: 1

    ... geeks think in binary, not BCD!

  60. Not all geek books are SF/Fantasy by bmo · · Score: 1

    Pick up a copy of Peter Hoeg's Borderliners

    That book gripped me by my shirt and threw me into a descent into School Hell. To say that it's well written is an understatement.

    Trust me.

    --
    BMO

  61. What about Geek Love? by gubachwa · · Score: 1
    Why isn't Geek Love by Katherine Dunn on the list?

    Oh.. you meant geek as in computer geek. Not geek as in a circus performer that bites the heads off of chickens. Sorry.. my mistake.

  62. Feeble list by snStarter · · Score: 1

    It's such a small sample but missing is:

    The Book of the New Sun
    Stand on Zanzibar
    Ender's Game
    Ring World

  63. What about "The Adolescence of P-1" by P1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Great 70's book on a computer program taking over. Worth a read.

    1. Re:What about "The Adolescence of P-1" by cranq · · Score: 1

      I've got that book. Pretty damn good for the time it was written, and probably worth at read, even today.

      --
      Regards, your friendly neighbourhood cranq
    2. Re:What about "The Adolescence of P-1" by caveat · · Score: 1

      My sophomore Algerbra II teacher gave me a copy of that book - it's surprisngly good. I do think the writing could be a bit better - while not bad at all, it's definitely not the work of a consummate author - the plot was really qute interesting. I wouldn't put it on the top 20, but it's definitely worth a read if you can scrounge up a copy.

      --

      Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
    3. Re:What about "The Adolescence of P-1" by AJ+Mexico · · Score: 1

      The Adolescence of P-1, Thomas J. Ryan 1977.
      I vote for this one! It's extra geeky. This novel shows what an AI could do even with the technology of the '70s. The book is set in the IBM mainframe world of the early '70s, even though the cover shows an early microcomputer and a VDT. I found the technology and terminology believable for the era, once you get past the slip on the first page: "Rich finished loading a pack on a 2314 disk file and ... ". You mounted (or loaded) a disk pack on a disk drive, not a file. Maybe that terminolgy varied at some sites though. Generally, the book captures the feel of an early machine room.
      Here's the Amazon link: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0671559702/103-53 69917-7467851?v=glance&n=283155&n=507846&s=books&v =glance

      --
      Computers obey me.
  64. Cryptic card game... by Urusai · · Score: 1

    ...that would be bridge. The bidding system is clearly some form of secret communication, privy to only those dumb enough to think that bridge is a real game.

  65. Thanks for the tip by oob · · Score: 1

    I'd never heard of Greg Egan until now. As your taste includes the sensational Ken MacLeod, I'll definitely make a point of reading Egan's stuff.

    MacLeod's early work, The Fall Revolution is simply the best Sci Fi I've ever read. Near future (at least in the beginning) dystopian sci-fi that extrapolates current social, technological and geo-political trends in an incisive manner. Want Unix shell commands in the fiction you read? Dreading the breakdown of the social fabric due to the inevitable result of rampant capitalism? Ready to take up arms to resist American hegemony? MacLeod is the author for you.

    1. Re:Thanks for the tip by stiefvater · · Score: 1

      Greg Egan is a damn genius. "Permutation City" is a must read.

  66. No Grey Lensman? by Jerry+Coffin · · Score: 3, Interesting
    With no Grey Lensman, this was obviously compiled by mostly young geeks! :-)

    Also, while Heinlein clearly had non-geeky characters, others pretty clearly were geeks by almost any definition -- Andrew Libby was the most obvious, but when Lazarus Long meets Andrew (in Methusalah's Children) and they start talking about Lazarus' modifications to Andrew's design for a ship's computer ("Integrator" IIRC) it becomes pretty clear that Lazarus is at least a part-time geek as well (then again, live long enough and you'll do almost everything at least part of the time). It is sad that one of the greatest science fiction writers of all time is represented only by one he openly stated was one of his worst (IIRC, in one of his later books, he has one of his characters comment on it saying something like "it's sad how far some authors stoop when they're desparate for money" (anybody remember that, or is my memory playing tricks on me?)

    Then again, any list that has science fiction but no Frederik Pohl, Stanislaw Lem, David Weber, Niven/Pournelle or Theodore Sturgeon clearly has some pretty large holes, to say the least (and that's still far from an exhaustive list...)

    --
    The universe is a figment of its own imagination.

    --
    The universe is a figment of its own imagination.
    1. Re:No Grey Lensman? by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they should have gone with Top 20 best geek Authors?

      Oh, and "Triplanetary" would be a better sugestion than Grey Lensman, being the first book in the series. Although I'm not sure how many people are fans of Space Opera.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    2. Re:No Grey Lensman? by Jerry+Coffin · · Score: 1
      Oh, and "Triplanetary" would be a better sugestion than Grey Lensman, being the first book in the series.

      It'd work, but it starts off slowly enough that I suspect most people who've really read it started out elsewhere.

      I also neglected to mention Edgar Rice Burroughs. Interesting in his own right, as well as being nearly necessary for some of Heinlein's stuff to really make sense.

      --
      The universe is a figment of its own imagination.

      --
      The universe is a figment of its own imagination.
    3. Re:No Grey Lensman? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Off topic, but funny how sigs, rather than a given name or handle, are really what makes you memorable in on-line forums. The moment I saw your sig, comp.lang.c++ and comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.win32 jumped to my mind.

    4. Re:No Grey Lensman? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The moment I saw your sig, comp.lang.c++ and comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.win32 jumped to my mind.

      Strange what sometimes sticks on your mind, isn't it?

      Years ago, on Fidonet somebody had a tagline something like:

      Jerry Coffin changes tagline. World to end soon.

      Hm...come to think of it, that was at least 10 (and probably more like 15) years ago. Maybe I should try to come up with a new tagline sometime...

      --
      The universe is a figment of its own imagination.

    5. Re:No Grey Lensman? by DoctorFrog · · Score: 2, Interesting
      (IIRC, in one of his later books, he has one of his characters comment on it saying something like "it's sad how far some authors stoop when they're desparate for money" (anybody remember that, or is my memory playing tricks on me?)


      Your memory's fine. The scene takes place in _The Number Of The Beast-_, when the four protagonists are comparing their favorite books. Two of the four voted for _Stranger In A Strange Land_, and one of the other two makes the comment about Heinlein only writing it for the money.

    6. Re:No Grey Lensman? by lilmouse · · Score: 1

      Actually, some of the first SF books I read were Lensman books. Those and the Weapon Shops of Isher. Very good. And some Le Guin novels - Left Hand of Darkness. Also "All Flesh is Grass" by...Simak?

      I guess I have my dad to blame for my slow slide down into Geekiness. Or my rapid rapelling.

      --LWM

    7. Re:No Grey Lensman? by dpilot · · Score: 1

      Skylark. Seaton and Crane. Blackie DuQuesne.

      Space Opera, silly writing, but there's a certain innocent joy to it.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    8. Re:No Grey Lensman? by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough, I just finished reading all 4 Skylark books the other day. Yeah, it's fun reading Wild West style books.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    9. Re:No Grey Lensman? by smithmc · · Score: 1

        It is sad that one of the greatest science fiction writers of all time is represented only by one he openly stated was one of his worst (IIRC, in one of his later books, he has one of his characters comment on it saying something like "it's sad how far some authors stoop when they're desparate for money" (anybody remember that, or is my memory playing tricks on me?)

      Ironically, the passage you're referring to is from an even worse Heinlein novel, The Number of the Beast, which really demonstrates how far some authors will stoop when they're desperate for money.

      BTW, I agree - Heinlein should be represented on this list by The Moon is a Harsh Mistress (or maybe Starship Troopers), not Stranger.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  67. Vernor Vinge by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

    "True Names". A short story rather than a novel, but way, way ahead of its time. Seems banal now only because Vinge was so damn in tune where the geek community was going.

    --
    The cake is a pie
    1. Re:Vernor Vinge by cranq · · Score: 1

      Mandatory reading. I enjoyed Every. Goddamned. Word.

      --
      Regards, your friendly neighbourhood cranq
    2. Re:Vernor Vinge by despik · · Score: 1

      Right on! Cyberpunk written before Gibson started thinking about buying a typewriter.

      --
      "I seem to have mastered a certain amount of control over physical reality."
    3. Re:Vernor Vinge by GeekDork · · Score: 1

      Vinge rocks! I can also recommend "Across Realtime" and "A Fire Upon The Deep". Both books cover the topic of extreme technological advance up to the point of transcendence, but they are radically different in scope.

      --

      Fight hunger. Filet a politician and send him to a 3rd world country of your choice.

  68. Re:Tom Swift Jr. Series, wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember reading almost all of this series of books in the early 70's. Some of them had some cool ideas. I always liked the Diving Seacopter.

  69. AD&D? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anyone else notice the glaring omission of AD&D novels? What about Forgotten Realms or DragonLance?

  70. YMMV! by stevesliva · · Score: 1
    I loved the Baroque Cycle. Entertaining, as Stephenson tends to be, along with being insightful about the emergence of capitalism and the scientific method and the debate about whether there's room for God in science (Leibniz and Waterhouse).

    If you're curious as to what the Baroque Cycle is about, the quotes here give a pretty good idea about the novels' setting without really blowing much about the plot: http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Neal_Stephenson

    --
    Who do you get to be an expert to tell you something's not obvious? The least insightful person you can find? -J Roberts
  71. Stephenson's 'The Big U' by Winlin · · Score: 1

    It has cool technology, some geeky ( and other just plain weird ) characters, and lots of abstract philiosophy. What could be better. Listen to the Big Wheel!

    1. Re:Stephenson's 'The Big U' by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      But does it have a readable style, and did it have a stern editor? Books like you've described can easily turn into self-indulgent navel-gazing.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  72. 1984 and H2G2, but no Sirens of Titan? by photon317 · · Score: 3, Informative


    I think they polled a not-so-well read segment of the geek population. Anyone who loved 1984 and H2G2 (which made spots 2 and 1 on the list) should have also read Vonnegut's The Sirens of Titan. It fills the space inbetween those two seemingly disconnected books we love so much; in many ways it is the literary bridge from 1984 to H2G2, and one of the greatest works of modern fiction on its own. A fan of either (or both) would see the connections readily, and appreciate it, and it certainly belongs in that list with them.

    --
    11*43+456^2
    1. Re:1984 and H2G2, but no Sirens of Titan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you, but was thinking more along the lines of "Cat's Cradle". C'mon, it even got a joke in Futurama!

  73. Missing: Egan, Stross, Sterling by Nova+Express · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Two notable absences are Greg Egan's Permutation City (among others) and Charles Stross' The Atrocity Archive and the stories in Accelerando (among others), and Bruce Sterling's Holy Fire and Distraction (among others). All are hardcore Geek works of real brilliance. Permutation City in particular was published about the same time as Snow Crash, and is both a better and more important novel.

    http://home.austin.rr.com/lperson/lame.html

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

    1. Re:Missing: Egan, Stross, Sterling by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      Permutation City in particular was published about the same time as Snow Crash, and is both a better and more important novel.

      Permutation City remains one of my favorite all-time science fiction novels. I would also include Egan's Quarantine and Tony Daniels' Earthling on a list of the best, along with just about anything Fredrick Pohl ever scribbled down (even his grocery list was probably brilliant).

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:Missing: Egan, Stross, Sterling by Malacca · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

      I would also add Vernor Vinge's A Fire Upon the Deep.

      I mentioned in an earlier comment that the poll was about as scientific as a /. one as the survey choices had already been limited to ones suggested by readers of Jack Schofield's blog. Link to actual survey here.

  74. but what about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where's "The Cuckoo's Egg", by Cliff Stoll?

    (available here)

  75. Stranger in a Strange Land by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

    I agree that Robert Heinlein deserves a place, but why select Stranger? This book was an essay about religion, and the result of a debate with Ron Hubbard. At the end of the day RAH remained a writer.

    My pick would be "Friday", which was a pretty good go at cyberpunk, written at the same time as Neuromancer.

  76. Look people... by inphinity · · Score: 1

    This happens every time someone/something posts a list of the "Top xx" in any category... You're bound to disagree with some if not all of the choices on the list, but it's there to foster discussion, not flame wars to decide who's "masterpiece" is the be-all end-all.

  77. Props by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd just like to put in a good word for my favorite obscure young adult scifi novel, Invitation to the Game by Monica Hughes. Behind that cheesy, 80s cover art is a wealth of immersive fiction goodness. (Man, I'd forgotten how ugly that book is. That probably turned off a lot of readers. :/ )

  78. Missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's missing the Cowboy Neal option. Didn't he write a geeky romance novel a few years ago?

  79. What about Stanislaw Lem? by DrJimbo · · Score: 1
    • Solaris
    • The Cyberiad
    • The Futurological Congress
    • Memoirs Found in a Bathtub
    • etc., etc.,

    Sort of a P.K. Dick on drugs ... and that's saying a lot.

    Since he didn't even make an honorable mention, perhaps he is still obscure enough to be true geek fodder.

    --
    We don't see the world as it is, we see it as we are.
    -- Anais Nin
    1. Re:What about Stanislaw Lem? by solarrhino · · Score: 1
      Lem is great... but he didn't write in English. That alone disqualifies him, but even if he didn't, I doubt he's well enough known to win a popularity contest like this one. Too bad, of course - he is unquestionably the greatest sci-fi writer that I've ever read.

      Incidently, I found your comparision to Dick both apt and ironic, given that their interesting history.

      --
      "Lord, grant that I may always be right, for Thou knowest that I am hard to turn" -- A Scots-Irish prayer
    2. Re:What about Stanislaw Lem? by vidarh · · Score: 1

      I'd add Karel Capek as another non-English writer that would deserve to be on the list. Read "The war with the newts". Incidentally he was also the first author to use the word "robot" in his play Rossum's Universal Robots (though the word was apparently invented by his brother - see the linked page for background)

    3. Re:What about Stanislaw Lem? by magicchex · · Score: 1

      I've always been surprised that The War With The Newts hasn't been made into a movie. On the other hand, they'd probably ruin it.

      Anyways, I agree that Lem is a notable omission.

      --
      How many fulltime jobs can one man have?
  80. Baen Free Library by Rank_Tyro · · Score: 1

    For great science fiction novels online, Baen Free Library has a nice selection of stories.

    --
    Today's show is brought to you by the number 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0: 25
  81. Where in the world is by arun_s · · Score: 1

    Carl Sagan's Contact?
    And LOTR?
    and HG Wells' Time Machine?

    --
    I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
  82. Powers and Mieville by loafswell · · Score: 0

    The two authors mentioned in the subject line are worth a look by anyone that likes the kind of books mentioned in the list. I'd vote these books: Perdido Street Station - China Mieville Expiration Date and Earthquake Weather - Tim Powers And maybe also Tad Williams for his Otherland series.

  83. Red dwarf? by Travy.b · · Score: 0


    I'm really surprised a Red Dwarf book wasn't listed. Sure they aren't as popular and well known as many of the others listed but since when have geeks cared about that?

    It's well recieved in the UK and Australia, but I guess some countries out there just haven't caught onto the brilliance of it just yet ;-)

    PS - Just noticed there was only 132 responses. THAT must be the reason.

  84. The lacking list... by thexgodfather · · Score: 0

    It seems to me that this list is lacking horribly! I think that he should have put sub categories so that the more popular books would be seperated from the less... everyone knows Geeks love Sci Fi... but what about fantasy? or non-fiction? I've read 5 of the 20 books up there and I would say Hitcher Hiker's Guid is probably my least favorite. The Foudation being my favorite on the list. Now what about Ender's Game by Orson Scott Card? I really think some fantasy books should be up there. Like Robert Jordan's "Eye of the world" ... or the Dragon Lance Chronicles by Tracy Hickman to name a few... I think I must be the only person to have found JRR Tolkien to be quiet a bore... but the Hobbit was good =)

  85. 1984 is not a geek novel by dzeaiter · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure why 1984 qualifies as a geek novel. It's something we studied at school, and something I believe should be mandatory reading for anyone who lives in a democracy and believes that "that stuff" can never happen to their society.

    It serves as a warning to those who would surrender their liberty for their safety.

    1. Re:1984 is not a geek novel by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 2, Informative

      Apparently you read it in school. Please reread (especially "The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism", which is the author talking directly to us) and learn more than the schools want you to know.

  86. The number 1 can't read the headline award goes to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    it's a top 20 dude!!

  87. Nah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, I thought Small Gods was a bit juvenile. If you're already familiar with the ideas of Shinto and religious satire, there isn't much there to surprise you. Some aspects of it were pretty shallow - for example, great care was taken to describe the way Vorbis thought, but he seemed to have no particular reason or motivation for his beliefs, which leads me to believe that Pratchett was simply attacking a straw man. And of course, half the jokes assume that you've read the other books, which, to be honest, is probably why The Color of Magic is in the list: it's the only Discworld book that actually stands on its own.

    1. Re:Nah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "Vorbis...seemed to have no particular reason or motivation for his beliefs."

      That was part of the satire. Vorbis, the maniacally religious leader of millions of Omnians, didn't actually believe. The only thing he really believed in was...Vorbis. The deeper satire is that Vorbis was also a stand-in for the entire religious edifice. Its inner workings become of great importance and precision, but end up having no particular reason or motivation. It's a social machine that believes only in itself, relies only on its own power, protects only its own power, and ends up existing to serve no purpose for no reason. Not entirely true of all religions all the time, of course, but that is the satirical point nevertheless.

    2. Re:Nah. by emilper · · Score: 1

      Terry Pratchett does not write fantasy, he writes political philosophy put into dialogues ... even the "lightest" of his novels, those revolving around Rincewind, are very political ... I would add "Only You Can Save Mankind" after "Small Gods" and "Men at Arms" ...

  88. Hyperion... by gmuslera · · Score: 4, Interesting

    .. by Dan Simmons. As with Dune, Enders Game (also missing), etc, the rest of the serie could not be as good as the 1st book, but still, is one of the best sci-fi books i had read so far.

    1. Re:Hyperion... by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      For some strange reason, i though so, too (hyperion being the best).
      But looking back, i ended up rereading the endymion books 3 or 4 times while i dont feel like rereading hyperion, so somehow they appeal to me more.
      But all 4 are awesome in the way each is unique.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  89. Frank Herbert.. by JimiSpier · · Score: 0

    All of the Dune books..

    --
    Jimi Spier
    www.jimispier.com - My tunes
  90. The Shockwave Rider. by arcade · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm quite disappointed that so few people have read 'The Shockwave Rider'. It's understandable as the book is a tad difficult to get (at least it was difficult when I got hold of it.. it hadn't been in print for 10-15 years or so).

    It's a great book. It's given us so much terminology.

    Take it as a recommendation.

    --
    "Rune Kristian Viken" - http://www.nwo.no - arca
    1. Re:The Shockwave Rider. by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Seconded. (Shock, Sheep and Stand are Brunner's three must-reads.) And add True Names by Vernor Vinge as another "What were they thinking by leaving this off?!?!" book.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  91. The Lost World by hobrah · · Score: 1

    I enjoyed Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's The Lost World. Also Edgar Rice Burroughs' John Carter of Mars.

    1. Re:The Lost World by whitehatlurker · · Score: 1
      Ahh. Dejah Thoris ...

      Hmmm. You might like this as well then.

      --
      .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
  92. The Lathe of Heaven by Ursula LeGuin by einhverfr · · Score: 1

    Quite frankly I am not a huge fan of the Earthsea Trilogy, but the Lathe of Heaven is a pretty interesting and deep book. It is about a man whose dreams come true and a few people who decide to manipulate this to change the world, literally. The book has a certain amount of discontinuity reminiscent of Slaughterhouse 5 but is far deeper and easier to follow (Slaughterhouse 5 comes across as a set of portraits which are more important than the storyline, while The Lathe of Heaven comes across as a pretty stern warning about messing with reality).

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    1. Re:The Lathe of Heaven by Ursula LeGuin by Shimmer · · Score: 1

      The Lathe of Heaven is probably my favorite book of all time. I come back to it every few years, and it's always a rewarding read. The character of Dr. Haber is fascinating and tragic. The scene where he attempts to distract Heather as most of the world's population "suddenly" dies of plague is stunning.

      --
      The most rabid believers in American Exceptionalism are the exact same people whose policies are destroying it.
    2. Re:The Lathe of Heaven by Ursula LeGuin by gentlemen_loser · · Score: 1

      While we are on Ursula LeGuin - I am a fan of Left Hand of Darkness. Her father is Alfred Kroeber, a prominent cultural anthropologist in his day. Alot of her writing (particularly LHoD) is written with an interesting cultural anthropology slant.

  93. Douglas R. Hofstadter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid

    A veritable bible! How could this be missed?

  94. What's with this "geek" stuff? by humankind · · Score: 1

    Why is all of a sudden the term "geek" being predmoninently used?

    A Geek is generally regarded as someone who is anti-social, yet lacking any complimentary talents or skills.

    WHEREAS, a Nerd is someone who may exhibit anti-social tendencies, but it's usually due to being absorbed in some sort of passionate, technical pursuit.

    Slashdot's motto indicates and understanding of the distinction between "geeks" and "nerds" and it would be nice if they didn't run stories clouding the definition of these terms. A geek is someone who isn't necessarily talented or skillful at ANYTHING. Geeks read comic books. Nerds read novels and tech manuals.

    1. Re:What's with this "geek" stuff? by typical · · Score: 1

      I've heard only "geek" used in a positive light.

      I think that the meaning of the two words has been transposed, in another ripple in the ever-changing river of English.

      --
      Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
    2. Re:What's with this "geek" stuff? by Omestes · · Score: 1

      I disagree with your definitions!

      A nerd is a member of the unwashed, and socially retarded (revolting) feild of intelligence, very smart, very single minded, completely inept. Think of Comic Book Guy.

      A geek is also very intelligent, but has social skills, granted this isn't much, much less than the average person, but much more than the common nerd. They also have more diverse hobbies.

      Nerds seem restricted to just CS, math, and physics. While geeks can be in anything that lets them obsess about things in intricate detail.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    3. Re:What's with this "geek" stuff? by Omestes · · Score: 1

      And, of course, geeks bite the heads of off chickens.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    4. Re:What's with this "geek" stuff? by vidarh · · Score: 1

      I used to agree with that distinction. However then I realised that it's highly location specific. In some areas geek have some positive connotation and nerd only negative, and other places it's the other way around.

    5. Re:What's with this "geek" stuff? by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      Interesting, if nothing else.

      Setting aside the historical meaning of geek, I've almost never come across your definitions of the two, except occasionally on /.. Common use of the terms across most of Canada is precisely the opposite, i.e. geek is a backhanded compliment, nerd is an outright insult. Most people I've talked to across the (english-speaking) world would agree.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    6. Re:What's with this "geek" stuff? by erinacht · · Score: 3, Informative

      Boffin

      "The word appeared during World War II, where it was applied with some affection to the people who invented radar, early digital computers, the atomic bomb, and other technologies that gave the Allies an advantage over the Axis during the war."
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boffin

      I've always prefered and will continue to use Boffin. It's a good word that encapsulates all the good of geek and nerd, is a bit more academic. It also has none of the baggage, except perhaps for absent mindedness.

      --
      Colm

    7. Re:What's with this "geek" stuff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geeks get laid, nerds don't.

    8. Re:What's with this "geek" stuff? by humankind · · Score: 1

      Historically, both "nerd" and "geek" were used as insults.

      However, "nerds" were the technically-talented. Geeks have never been characterized as such in a manner as consistent as "nerds".

      In our popular culture, you can see examples of both in the media and movies:

      Revenge of the Nerds: nerds (obviously)
      Napoleon Dynamite: geek
      Matthrew Broaderick in War Games: nerd
      Anthony Michael Hall in the Breakfast Club: geek
      Ralph Macchio in Crossroads: nerd
      Dumb and Dumber: geeks

      The two terms may be used interchangably, but in our popular culture, you can see differences. Some may say a "geek" may also be technically talented, but "nerds" have always been primarily characterized as those with superlative intelligence, while geeks have not.

  95. 1984 by Tengoo · · Score: 1

    I've always considered 1984 to be less geeky and more required reading for the general public. I also cannot think of many geeky (I'm beginning to cringe when I use that word) friends who haven't mentioned Childhood's End at least once.

  96. Z4CK: A Cyberthriller about a Zaurus Linux PDA by wehe · · Score: 1

    Kevin Milne has published Z4CK: A SciFi Novel about a Zaurus Linux PDA recently. From the LinuxDevices review: "It's 2031, and Microsoft advertises Linux on Edinburgh's largest billboards. Duncan Steele roams a brave new world, besting technoproles and fighting to extricate himself from a bogus murder rap, his trusty Sharp Zaurus by his side. So begins a cyberthriller from Scottish security professional Kevin Milne.
    Milne's novel, entitled "Z4CK," was written entirely on a Sharp Zaurus PDA. "Z4CK was written on the train, whilst on my way to and from work," says Milne. "My Zaurus SL-5500 equipped with Open-Zaurus, and the Pockettop wireless keyboard was used to write the story.""

  97. I'm really enjoying The Baroque Cycle by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 1

    I'm about 100 pages from the end of the final book and I've been enjoying the trip thoroughly.

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
    1. Re:I'm really enjoying The Baroque Cycle by steevc · · Score: 0

      I'm also on the final book and enjoying it. It's been a long trek and hard going at times, but overall I think it's an excellent piece of fiction. I'll be interested to see how he ties up the ending. That's not usually his strong point.

    2. Re:I'm really enjoying The Baroque Cycle by KFW · · Score: 1

      Keep going. It is a long slog, but worth it overall. Since each volume is divided into several books, if it got a bit tedious I'd finish a "book", put it down, read another novel, and then coming back to the next "book." Overall Stephenson wraps it up reasonably well.
      /K

  98. Burroughs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No Naked Lunch? What about the cut-up trilogy? Too obscure even for geeks?

  99. Why Stephenson is great by typical · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Stephenson is great because he writes about technology in a way that doesn't shatter the illusion for anyone who knows anything about technology. Unfortunately, most writers do this, because they don't know beans about technology. Stephenson is an ex-hacker (though since he is now in the business of propagating memes, and he described this in his first book as "neurolinguistic hacking", maybe he still considers himself a hacker).

    --
    Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
    1. Re:Why Stephenson is great by Stephen+Gilbert · · Score: 1

      Stephenson is an ex-hacker[...]

      There's no such thing as an ex-hacker. They just move on to hacking other things.

  100. Speak for yourself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOTR forever, bitch!

  101. Not only is it unscientific... by bob+whoops · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Maybe the list would be better if more than 132 people had voted. Hell, it looks like there are more comments on that page than people who voted.

  102. How about "Down and Out in the Magic Kingdom" by Chemicalscum · · Score: 1
    Yes I agree on Rigworld.

    But I think for me the best Geek novel I have read recently (and the best Geek Novel Of the Century) is Down and Out in the Magic Kingdom by Cory Doctorow.

    Looking forward to the Bichun Revolution :)

  103. Amen by typical · · Score: 1

    The strength of the Chronicles of Amber was enough to make me go out and read a bunch of other Zelazy -- it didn't measure up.

    The Chronicles of Amber, a ten book series (while the books are of good quality throughout, I like the first couple the most), is one of my favorite fantasy series. It mingles the the normal world with a very unique fantasy one -- no trolls or elves here. Unfortunately, few people seem to have read it.

    --
    Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
    1. Re:Amen by chromatic · · Score: 1

      Perhaps Lord of Light would measure up for you. It has a few similar themes, but very different characters and mechanisms (both literary and internal). I highly recommend it as Zelazny at his writing best.

    2. Re:Amen by -kertrats- · · Score: 1

      Are you sure there aren't trolls or elves? I'm certain in one shadow or another (probably nearer Chaos), there are all hosts of different mythical beings.

      If you couldn't tell my opinion already, GP is right; Amber definitely deserves to be there.

      --
      The Braying and Neighing of Barnyard Animals Follows.
    3. Re:Amen by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 1
      The strength of the Chronicles of Amber was enough to make me go out and read a bunch of other Zelazy -- it didn't measure up.

      In keeping with the theme, might I humbly recommend "Doorways in the Sand". The protagonist is a geek, and the opening chapter is one of the very few items I've read that made me actually laugh out loud. The rest of the book is nicely done, each chapter opening in medias res and the rest of the chapter explaining how he got into the predicament and how he gets out of it. Zelazny always did seem to like playing with storytelling forms.

      As others have noted, "Lord of Light" is extremely good. "Creatures of Light and Darkness" is a bit too experimental for my tastes, but when it's good it's very good.

      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
  104. American Gods? Huh?! by sudog · · Score: 1

    Bad choice. That book is terrible!

  105. My additions by millennial · · Score: 1

    Goedel-Escher-Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid (Douglas R. Hofstadter)
    Oryx and Crake (Margaret Atwood)
    Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance (Robert M. Pirsig)
    Ender's Game (Orson Scott Card)
    Illusions: The Adventures of a Reluctant Messiah (Richard Bach)
    The Xanth series (Piers Anthony)
    The Mode series (Piers Anthony)
    The Black Tower series (Stephen King)
    THE FSCKING LORD OF THE RINGS. (J.R.R. MotherFSCKIN' Tolkein.)

    --
    I am scientifically inaccurate.
  106. Microserfs?? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    Yeesh, not in a million years. It was only somewhat readable at the time, and otherwise I've completely forgotten it. (And I own a copy somewhere.)

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  107. Marge Piercy: He, She and It by wehe · · Score: 1

    My favorite is Marge Piercy's He, She and It. From Danny Yee's Book Reviews:"Stand aside William Gibson and Bruce Sterling! Body of Glass (He, She, and It in the United States) is a combination of future history and cyberpunk that is a match for Neuromancer in excitement and breadth of vision, but it is also a far greater novel. Not only is it better written, with a less artificial plot and deeper characterisation, but it also works through the consequences of its ideas in a far more sophisticated fashion. Shira has lost custody of her son to her husband, and has left the Y-S "multi" that employs her to return to her home "free town". One of the town leaders, feeling danger threatening, has built Yod, an illegal cyborg (full artificial intelligence in a human shaped vehicle) to defend them. But Y-S is after Yod... The narrative contains enough political intrigue, biologically enhanced assassins and data piracy to keep the cyberpunk fans happy, but it also has some serious meat in it. It tackles head-on some of the philosophical and ethical dilemmas likely to be involved in the development of artificial intelligence. Interlaced with the main story is a secondary narrative. This is the story (as told to Yod by Shira's mother Malkah) of a Jewish Rabbi in 17th century Prague who creates a clay golem to defend his people from a threatened pogrom."

  108. Overly harsh by GunFodder · · Score: 1

    William Gibson wrote one truly great novel. The problem is that he kept writing it over and over again.

  109. David Zindell: Neverness, Requiem for Homo Sapiens by ynotds · · Score: 1

    While we were getting over our longing for stories short enough to read in one sitting, it seems like Zindell's four sf tomes (Requiem is a trilogy) slid under almost everybody's radar in the rush to get to the new millennium.

    Without a line of mathematics, it is surely a sufficiently geeky approach that FTL travel is achived in Zindell's universe by master pilots proving mathematical theorems on the fly to safely navigate a "thick" space between portals into "near space" at stars.

    A gifted copy of Neverness sat neglected on my bookshelf through the '90s, but having finally decided to give it a try, I soon turned up the trilogy and read them in quick succession.

    Personally I'd rate all of them ahead of half that list and Tbe Broken God on a par with Dune and Neuromancer, the latter of which I just finished rereading.

    --
    -- Our systemic servants do not good masters make.
  110. personal lists by rogueleadzer0 · · Score: 1

    There does seem to be a large amount of dissension over what novels should be on this top 20 lits so i must as what books would you personally put on a top list, mine are over at my blog http://rogueleadzer0.blogspot.com/2005/11/geek-boo ks.html what about the rest of you geeks out there(i know you want to say)

  111. Of *all* time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In that case, Giles Goat-Boy by John Barth should be somewhere on the list.

    But perhaps it's a generation or two too old.

  112. Left Hand of Darkness? by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    The Left Hand of Darkness is coma-inducing? It's under three hundred pages, and moves along pretty briskly.

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  113. Zelazny by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 2, Interesting
    "Creatures Of Light And Darkness" by Roger Zelazny. A science fiction so strange it takes a second reading to realize it even *is* a science fiction.

    I don't know if it rates as a geek novel, but I like it.

    1. Re:Zelazny by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      "Creatures of Light and Darkness" is NOT a science fiction novel (in my arrogant opinion). It's a fantasy novel with lots of SF trimmings. On the other hand, Zelazny's "Lord of Light" (written at just about the same time), which at first glance looks even more like a fantasy novel, is science fiction, albeit barely. What makes it truly interesting is that these two novels are more similar to each other than they are to pretty much anything else in either of the fantasy or science fiction genres. Both deal with wars between the Gods of traditional pantheons. The difference is that while CoLaD (which covers the ancient Egyptian pantheon) is full of space ships and advanced science, it makes no attempt to justify or explain its Gods and their magic. They simply are. Thus, it's fantasy. On the other hand, LoL (which covers the Hindu pantheon), while it is utterly lacking in traditional science fiction elements (the people of its world are on the verge of discovering the flush toilet), it at least pretends to justify the Gods and their magic, by claiming that they are the crew (or descendents of the crew) of the ship that colonized the planet, and they were mutated by cosmic radiation during the interstellar flight to the new planet, while the regular colonists were in cryogenic suspension, and thus remained regular humans. Sure, it's about as credible an explanation as "Spiderman was bitten by a radioactive spider, which gave him the power to jump hundreds of feet and cling to the sides of skyscrapers" but it's the attempt to provide a rational explanation, however farfetched, that provides (IMO) the only real boundaries between the often-blurred genres of science fiction and fantasy.

      What's more, I think Zelazny deliberately made the more overtly science-fictional of these novels be the one that was actually fantasy, and vice versa, in order to challenge preconcieved notions. But I never quite got around to asking him about it, and now, of course, I never will.

      I realize that not everyone will agree with the line I've drawn between fantasy and SF, and that's ok. But in the sixties, at the time these novels were written, a lot of people were asking just where that line should be drawn, and the answer I've provided was a fairly common (though not universally accepted) answer. And I think Zelazny was deliberately trying to challenge this answer, by pushing it as far as he could. Which makes these novels, at least to some extent, pretty darn geeky after all! :)

    2. Re:Zelazny by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1
      No, there's just many different types of SF. There's people who focus the SF label to what used to be called "hard SF", but most fans laugh at those folks and put dirt in their hair. In the middle is "science fantasy" and a dozen other subgenres.

      And in the end, who gives a damn? Read what what you want to read. It really not worth having an "arrogant opinion" about.

  114. Use a series of slashdot polls as a survey? by waferhead · · Score: 1

    A well planned set of slashdot polls might actually make for a valid survey.
    (for the obvious sample population)

    Std poll setup might require some mods, but I think it could work.

    Taco? Anyone?

    1. Re:Use a series of slashdot polls as a survey? by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1

      Pretty certain it's been done. Maybe not specifically in English since a certain date, though.

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
  115. War of the Worlds or ... by freedom_india · · Score: 1, Troll

    KHAAANN ! OK, it is not a book. But still couldn't resist it

    --
    "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
  116. Cat's Cradle by dukerobinson · · Score: 1

    Where the hell is "Cat's Cradle," by Kurt Vonnegut?

  117. I agree, Geeks made JRR big by terminal.dk · · Score: 1

    Around 1980 when I read The Hobbit and LotR for the first time, it was only the geeks who read it. Later when I saw the first LotR movie (the mixed movie/comics thing, that ran out of budget) it was also the geeks that went there. They were the only people to know the book.

    The Hobbit and LotR are both large geek books.

    I also miss Ringworld. Lary Niven is big in science fiction.

    1. Re:I agree, Geeks made JRR big by dpilot · · Score: 1

      I read it around 76 or 77, when it was something you did to impair your Finals. Kind of like swimming with a backpack of bricks. Clearly a geek thing.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  118. Uh, these are geeks we're talking about, so wheres by Proc6 · · Score: 1

    I would have thought "Hustler" by Larry Flynt would have been #1.

    --

    I'm Rick James with mod points biatch!

  119. Trouble with Lichen by pnevin · · Score: 1

    Trouble with Lichen isn't that great a book. I can remember hunting it out and reading it after enjoying Day of the Triffids and The Chrysalids as a youngster, and it was pretty disappointing.

    In other news, I can't believe Slaughterhouse Five didn't make that list.

  120. Yeah, where's the PHB? by lilmouse · · Score: 1

    Or are they not counting the Players HandBook as a novel?

    --LWM

  121. Great SF writer by ironman_one · · Score: 1

    H. G. Wells? # The Time Machine (1895)* # The Island of Dr. Moreau (1896)* # The Invisible Man (1897)* # The War of the Worlds (1898)* # The First Men in the Moon (1901)*

  122. Guess I'm only 60% geek... by payndz · · Score: 1
    ...because I've only read 12 of the 20.

    On the other hand, I, Robot was the first 'real' book I ever read (as opposed to one with pictures in it), at the age of five, so that undoubtedly started me along the path to geekdom. And I was very disappointed to learn that the robots weren't real. It's now over 30 years later and I'm still waiting, damn it!

    --
    You must think in Russian.
  123. English bias? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could the bias be explained by the fact that the paper is a UK publiction, thus the voters (all 132 of them) are probably Brits, or expats....

  124. what about the classics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    anyone who read all of Proust's À la recherche du temps perdu is a geek. and anyone who understood half of Finnegans Wake is much more of a geek.

  125. Neil Gaiman and American Gods by stonedonkey · · Score: 1

    I recognize that Gaiman is quite talented in the graphic novel field, and that American Gods has been widely lauded (winner of the Hugo [i]and[/i] Nebula, nominated for the World Fantasy awards, etc.) but I just don't see the appeal. I think he paints some vivid vignettes, but I think his novel characters are generally quite thin and the plot arcs suddenly halted.

    I still remember with annoyance the constant reminder in American Gods that "a storm is coming." He engendered in the reader a long-simmering anticipation of a thrilling climax, with constant (and IMHO) and heavy-handed foreshadowing. Unfortunately, the narrative fulcrum occurred in the space of perhaps two paragraphs, and I found it incredibly unconvincing (and aggravatingly brief after a leadup of several hundred pages). I think there are much better books to be found in the Hugo- and Nebula award libraries, and it puzzles me how Gaiman managed to nab both nods for I thought was a middling novel, albeit one with an original mythology and those vivid vignettes (like when Shadow showed a sleight-of-hand trick to an unsuspecting boy in the library).

    I wish Gaiman the best in his professional efforts, and I hope to see another novel from him soon; but I just don't get the admiration this novel has acculumated. (And no, I'm not a bitter also-ran :p)

  126. What?!!! No Dianetics? NO DIANETICS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can you call yourself a geek, and not have read Dianetics. Honest question!!

  127. UK "Geek".... by MosesJones · · Score: 1


    One thing you need to realise is that JRR Tolkein is more of a kids book (these days I know it wasn't when released) than a "Geek" book. The second thing you have to realise is that the UK and US definitions and groups of Geeks are very seperate.

    Basically the UK can't hope to compare with the US Geeks in the "never getting laid stakes" and equally the literature is a little less "hard-core", hence things like the superb Terry Pratchett books get a high rating.

    I always thought I was a geek until I went to my first US Developer conference...

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:UK "Geek".... by julesh · · Score: 1

      Basically the UK can't hope to compare with the US Geeks [...] equally the literature is a little less "hard-core", hence things like the superb Terry Pratchett books get a high rating.

      Huh? The UK produces just about all of the geekiest literature, IMO. Look at any book by Ian Stewart & Jack Cohen, for example. Iain M. Banks' novels (or, for that matter, Iain Banks -- they may not be SF, but they're still geeky). Charles Stross. Ken McLeod. Dave Langford. These people produce a large proportion of the best, hardest, geekiest science fiction today.

      What does the US have to compare? Greg Bear? Cory Doctorow? Please. ;)

    2. Re:UK "Geek".... by Dix_sw · · Score: 1

      or, for that matter, Iain Banks -- they may not be SF, but they're still geeky).

      Actually, he's there at #14, with Consider Phlebas, though. I gess, just as with Pratchet's, they chose this one because it's the first of the culture books. I haven't read them all, but it should have been Use of Weapons.

      --
      "So, once you know what the question actually is, you'll know what the answer means."
    3. Re:UK "Geek".... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably my favourite sci-fi book of all time.

      And I've read a few.....

    4. Re:UK "Geek".... by IngramJames · · Score: 1

      or, for that matter, Iain Banks -- they may not be SF, but they're still geeky

      I read in an interview that Iain Banks regretted the use of his initial for his "Sci-Fi" novels, and not using it for his "straight" novels. His "straight" work isn't always so straight, you see... "Walking on Glass", for example, is partially set in another dimension. "The Wasp Factory" is.. well.. simply one of the sickest, twisted, wierdest, most brilliant works I've ever read. The point being that (at least with Banks), it's kind of hard to tell what's Sci-Fi and what isn't, sometimes... So the question perhaps should be: "Is it Sci-Fi? Who cares! Does it challenge and entertain me - and is it well written?"

      Having said that, I do tend to dive straight for the Sci-Fi section of any given bookshop ;-)

      --
      'No rational religion claims "supernatural" exists, that's an atheist slander.' - seen on slashdot.
    5. Re:UK "Geek".... by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Stephen Baxter. Read 'The Raft', very nice bit of work.

    6. Re:UK "Geek".... by RFC959 · · Score: 1

      Really? I liked Use of Weapons, but I'm not sure it was the geekiest of his books. I might have given that laurel to The Player of Games, perhaps? Then again, it's been a while since I read Consider Phlebas, and there's other Banks I haven't read.

    7. Re:UK "Geek".... by X10 · · Score: 0

      I was thinking of the Player of Games too, but now I think The Bridge should be on the list.

      --
      no, I don't have a sig
  128. Jack Vance by ballpoint · · Score: 1

    Each time the scifi topic comes up on /. I mention Jack Vance and all I get in return is the equivalent of a blank stare. And I find it strange that none of his books have - to my knowledge - been turned into a movie.

    Vance is a master at creating bizarre worlds, societies, technology and characters. The books are seriously funny (the "dry British humor" way), have a decently twisted plot and are baroquely decorated with myriad minutiae.

    Granted, some books could be considered more "space fantasy" than scifi, but you will always find more than a dash of unfamiliar science and technology structuring the studied society.

    --
    Flourescent (adj): smelling like ground wheat.
  129. Lovecraft??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, Cthulhu references are widespread among geeks, and so are some of his other novels (mountains of madness, ...).
    I'd love to see him in the top 10 somehow.

  130. Jack Schofield is a plonker by Epeeist · · Score: 1

    Try reading some of Jack Schofield's columns in the Guardian online. The man is an arrogant boor, convinced he is always right and trashing anybody who doesn't agree with him. He is also a devoted microserf and seems to delight in putting down anyone who takes exception to their software or business practices.

  131. It's a British list... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ... and every time some British magazine publishes one of these lists, Americans basically go, "wha...?"

    Try and view this list through, uhm... Britishness, and it makes slightly more sense.

  132. Where the fuck... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... is Stanislaw Lem on that list?

  133. Altered Carbon - Richard Morgan by bloodredsun · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Probably the best book, sci-fi or not, I've read over the last couple of years. It's probably too new to get into many peoples top lists and as the author is British he hasn't had the exposure that he could have across the states.

    Smart, funny, sexy, violent and with one of the greatest heros around, this book deserves to be on that list.

    He's since written 2 more Kovac novels (and another non-Kovac book that I think was an adaptation of an old short story). They are excellent but Altered Carbon stands out as a truely excellent story

    1. Re:Altered Carbon - Richard Morgan by GrpA · · Score: 1

      I'd second that. I've read most of the novels mentioned, and Richard Morgen's "Altered Carbon" leaves most of them behind.

      It's one of the only books I have read where you don't see many of the twists coming despite his rubbing your nose in it.

      I really object to it's omission. I guess I should probably make it personal...

      (heh, not seriously...)

      GrpA

      --
      Enjoy science fiction? "Turing Evolved" - AI, Mecha, Androids and rail-gun battles. What more could you want?
    2. Re:Altered Carbon - Richard Morgan by misterbond · · Score: 1

      I agree certainly one of the best new sci-fi novels that I have read in a while. certainly get the geek vote from me.

    3. Re:Altered Carbon - Richard Morgan by nb+caffeine · · Score: 1

      Probably the best book, sci-fi or not, I've read over the last couple of years.

      I'll second that. I was very suprised at the quality of the book. One of my new favorites.

      --

      "Something's wrong with you...and I hope we never do meet again." - Deftones When Girls Telephone Boys
  134. I disagree by Hecatonchires · · Score: 1

    but you don't appear to own a reb1100 (rocket ebook 1100). Once you do, you'll agree reading a machine is just as easy as reading a page, and easier in bed.

    --

    Yay me!

  135. 20 Geek Books ... ok then by lorelorn · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I'm going to jump right in and put my list down before looking at anyone else's comments - I assume I won't be alone here.

    • 1. Quicksilver by Neal Stephenson (geeks in time! not to be missed)
    • 2. Snow Crash by Neal Stephenson (it's good, and frankly, a samurai sword wielding computer hacker named Hiro Protagonist is what many here aspire to be)
    • 3. Ilium by Dan Simmons (good stuff. Greek gods and that... in space!!! and time)
    • 4. The Demon Haunted World by Carl Sagan (ooo, non-fiction. something like this needs to act as our Bible if we are to seriously combat the pseudo-religious waffle that is stifling science and learning these days
    • 5. Watchmen by Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons (the graphic novel that started it all)
    • 6. The Forever War by Joe Haldeman (probably the best example of welding the science into science fiction and still telling a great story)
    • 7. A Game of Thrones by George RR Martin. (unlike most fantasy novels, this one is actaully good. Better than that, it's great!)
    • 8. Longitude by Dava Sobel (a great read about those geeks of the past who attempted to solve one of the greatest problems of their day - and bitched and fought with one another instead of working together to get the job done)
    • 9. Good Omens by Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman (what if the antichrist were a geek wunderkind?)
    • 10. A Short History of Nearly Everything by Bill Bryson (kind of like a geek primer really. How we got to where we are)
    • 11. Perdido Street Station by China Mieville (what, steampunk pseudo-Victorian sci-fi? Mieville described it as 'the new wierd' but then disowned the title. I like mine better anyway.
    • 12. The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli (when geeks get to tell the people in charge how to behave, it tends to come out a bit like this)
    • 13. Cat's Cradle by Kurt Vonnegut (geeks destroy the world, normal -ie chain-smoking, girl-fucking- guy looks on, nonplussed
    • 14. Y The Last Man by Brian K Vaughan (what if the last man alive were a skinny geek?)
    • 15. Evolution by Stephen Baxter (ok, now this one takes the long view)
    • 16. The Illiad by Homer (because you should)
    • 17. The Lord of the Rings by JRR Tolkien (see notes on 16)
    • 18. American Gods by Neil Gaiman (UK residents may prefer to substitute Neverwhere here, this is perfectly acceptable)
    • 19. Douglas Adams (whichever of his books you want)
    • 20. Slashdot ("hey that's not a book!" - I know but you need to throw the home crowd a bone)
  136. The Forever War by GeekDork · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Forever War by Joe Haldeman is a must-read, IMO. It raises some points about war that hold true even on today's tiny scale (who started it? why is it still going on? what the hell are we fighting for?)

    --

    Fight hunger. Filet a politician and send him to a 3rd world country of your choice.

    1. Re:The Forever War by squarooticus · · Score: 2, Informative

      SPOILERS.

      Most of the book was fine, but the end was ridiculous. I mean, an interstellar war starting due to a "misunderstanding"? Please.

      --
      [ home ]
    2. Re:The Forever War by Fraser · · Score: 1

      An interstellar war wouldn't start on a misunderstanding?

      On the contrary, given the vast cultural differences and shock of the unknown involved, I can't think of a more plausible way for an interstellar war to start.

      It's certainly not going to be over resources, as a planet's resouces would be nothing compared to the cost of such an enterprise.

      Haldeman tells a convincing story, from a very human viewpoint, of how war changes society and the individuals caught up in it. I especially love how the focus of the book is brought inward, from devastating weapons employed thoughout the campaigns to the climactic battle being fought with just sticks and stones.

      Utterly timeless and compelling -- anyone who reads it will be touched by at least one of the ideas it contains.

      F

    3. Re:The Forever War by Forbman · · Score: 1

      Well, us Hatfields (or McCoys) could tell you a few things about "misunderstandings" as well.

  137. Tad WIlliams? Otherland! by weinford · · Score: 1

    This novel changed my life and made me write a doctoral thesis! If Otherland by Tad Williams isn't geek literature at it's best... well maybe it has a too large char[] for many ;)

    --

    This sig is stolen from someone who had a much better idea than I had.
  138. No value by mseeger · · Score: 1
    From the web page:

    So far, 132 people have voted for the best geek novels

    With 132 votes, the result is complete random. Why don't we start a poll on /. ?

    Regards, Martin

  139. If you look at the poll... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The results make a lot more sense if you look at the poll. Basically, this isn't a top 20 geek novels list, but a "which books have been read most often" list, picked from about 40 books chosen based on some random message board comments.
    I mean, I consider Stephenson's books to be far more deserving of being labeled as a geek novel than the foundation, but I'm not going to label the foundation as being bad.

  140. Schofield clearly an Illuminatus by willmorton · · Score: 2, Funny
    (From TFA)

    19. The Illuminatus! Trilogy -- Robert Shea & Robert Anton Wilson 23%
    1. Re:Schofield clearly an Illuminatus by Explodo · · Score: 1

      Nah, it's clearly a way to mislead us into thinking that they exist only in some geek fantasyland. He's really a pawn and there are four others (mis)leading us in different directions. Go ahead, ask Hagbard if you don't believe me.

  141. Where is... by pilsner.urquell · · Score: 1

    Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury

  142. Mod Parent Down by Bazzalisk · · Score: 1

    Halo doesn't resemble ringworld much at all - it's got a lot more in common with the Orbitals of Iain M. Banks' Culture novels.

    --
    James P. Barrett
    1. Re:Mod Parent Down by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      Halo has much more in common with the movie "Aliens" than with any sci-fi novel. The only thing it took from "Ringworld" was the concept of a ringworld (which really played no practical part in the game, merely serving as an interesting visual backdrop).

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  143. Give me a break... by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 0
    no Kurt Vonnegut ?

    Slaughterhouse-Five

    Cat's Cradle

    Besides, where is "The Story of 'O'" ?

    1. Re:Give me a break... by perdu · · Score: 1

      Dont' forget Player Piano! It is starting to look for and more prophetic: that technology has the tendancy to increase the gap between the haves and have-nots

      --
      You only use 2% of your DNA
  144. Rick Cook's Wizard series by ebbe11 · · Score: 1

    Okay, high-brow litterature it isn't but I still enjoy Rick Cook's Wizard series. The main character is a geek that gets transported to a parallel world where magic works and computers don't. He is like a fish on land until he figures out how to program magic. From there the fun begins. Also, the references to programming and computers are mostly correct.

    --

    My opinion? See above.
  145. The Cuckoo's Egg of course! by MatsPalats · · Score: 1

    Just the subtitle should make it qualify for that list... "Tracking a Spy Through the Maze of Computer Espionage"

    Excellent book by Clifford Stoll, he details how he got involved in computer security.
    It's really a quite exciting thriller like story.

    Book Description
    Cliff Stoll was an astronomer turned systems manager at Lawrence Berkeley Lab when a 75-cent accounting error alerted him to the presence of an unauthorized user on his system. The hacker's code name was "Hunter" -- a mystery invader hiding inside a twisting electronic labyrinth, breaking into U.S. computer systems and stealing sensitive military and security information. Stoll began a one-man hunt of his own, spying on the spy -- and plunged into an incredible international probe that finally gained the attention of top U.S. counterintelligence agents. The Cuckoo's Egg is his wild and suspenseful true story -- a year of deception, broken codes, satellites, missile bases, and the ultimate sting operation -- and how one ingenious American trapped a spy ring paid in cash and cocaine,and reporting to the KGB.

    Read more at Amazon

  146. I have a couple by therealplagel · · Score: 1

    Lots of Crichton books are made for geeks I think :D And I'll take this time to shamelessly plug Hyperion and its sequels, which should be SOMEWHERE on some list like this. ok

    --
    Sex - The formula in which one and one makes three.
    1. Re:I have a couple by cornjchob · · Score: 1

      I heard hyperion sux0rs

      - anonymous coward
      "There is no spone" - the matricks

      --
      We now have confirmed reports from an informed Orange County minister that Ethel is still an active communist.
  147. pratchett... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... has the geekiest type of humour since adams. that's why it fits in.

  148. Verne and 1932 by dpilot · · Score: 1

    I read Jules Verne, and it was clearly after 1932.

    Summer of 2nd grade, I went to the bookmobile with my older neighbor. I was on a submarine kick at the time, and picking out submarine books appropriate to a 2nd grader. She was several years older, and chastised me for getting, "those 2-page kids' books." In response, I checked out "20,000 Leagues Under the Sea." It took me several renewals to read, and I really didn't understand it all, but I stuck to it to the end. I was a bit disappointed, because after all of the comic-book intimations of the Nautilus being nuclear-powered, ISTR it turned out to be really good batteries, pardon me, accumulators.

    Perhaps it was THE turning point for me, though on can easily arguably if it hadn't been 20,000 Leagues, there would have been another science fiction book. I've read, and re-read much since then, but I've never gone back to 20,000 Leagues. One of these days I really should.

    On a similar note, when she was in 5th or 6th grade, my daughter read, "The Hot Zone." I had to help her through a rough patch, telling her, "This is as gross as it gets, it won't get any worse." She's now in high school, gets great grades, and is tentatively headed toward a career in medical research.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    1. Re:Verne and 1932 by b100dian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I read Jules Verne, and it was clearly after 1932. He would be _this_ Verne, Jules?
      http://www.kirjasto.sci.fi/verne.htm : It says "1828-1905"

      Clearly the man (JVerne) had the brains to fool somebody that the books are written in the FUTURE.

      --
      gtkaml.org
    2. Re:Verne and 1932 by whitehatlurker · · Score: 1
      I don't think so. Only H G Wells could do that.

      Hmmm. Wells' "Shape of things to come" would fit in, time wise. Is it geeky?

      --
      .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
    3. Re:Verne and 1932 by dpilot · · Score: 1

      You're getting to accurate/subtle/literal. I meant that I first read Verne in 1965, and that date was clearly after 1932. Another way of saying that fine literature is fine literature, regardless of when it was written.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    4. Re:Verne and 1932 by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1
      I meant that I first read Verne in 1965, and that date was clearly after 1932.
      So what? I don't know what the significance of the date is, it came from TFA. But unfortunately for you (as was clear to everyone else) the date in question was the date of writing or publishing. If you think about it, if it meant the date of reading, it would be fairly meaningless wouldn't it? Because while the former happens once per work, the latter is different for every person.

      P.S. lessons on English comprehension are generally more acceptable from people who know the difference between "to" and "too".

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    5. Re:Verne and 1932 by dpilot · · Score: 1

      Date of reading has some significance, especially if it's long after date of publication. Some books fade faster than the paper rots. Others don't. If you're talking about significant books, I would think that staying power would be a plus.

      P.S. Sorry about the missing "o". I'm usually more of a grammar/spelling nazi, though my pet peeve is "loose" vs "lose".

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    6. Re:Verne and 1932 by Malacca · · Score: 1

      I suspect it's a nod to the Times 100 best English language novels from 1923 to the present list that inspired it.

  149. trouble with lichen? by lee+n.+field · · Score: 1

    Isn't that a little obscure? I've read it, many years ago. It didn't strike me at the time as anything significant.

    1. Re:trouble with lichen? by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say it was his best anyway, but I think Wyndham's stuff isn't flash-bang-technobabble enough for some. But then some people think "Independence Day" is a good movie.

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
  150. You people read? Nerrrrrrrrds! by rooster9 · · Score: 0

    You guys/gals read? Nerrrrrrds! Sorry, what?

  151. to be.. or not.. to geek. by joerdie · · Score: 1

    i guess either im no longer a geek (w00t!) or im a bigger geek than i thought. (sigh.) ive only read two or three books on that list and im a "reader."

  152. Female geeks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It has been observed that all the authors are male. A "Geek Girls Canon Challenge" has been set up to rectify this. I don't have the link at the moment but it's not hard to find.

  153. I'm partial to Final Victim by jocknerd · · Score: 1

    Final Victim http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0380728168/104-81 19741-8893512?v=glance&n=283155&n=507846&s=books&v =glance is written by Stephen J. Cannell. Its the typical law enforcement vs. serial murderer novel but with technology thrown in. The reprint was issued in 1997 yet the story details how the serial murderer's use of Linux.

  154. No Pynchon? No Brunner? by georgeha · · Score: 1

    While the author mentioned the lack of Brunner's Shockwave Rider (which has all sorts of cool stuff like an internet, worm, anonymous sites and a distributed attack), no one mentioned Pynchon. Gravity's Rainbow is awesome, what could be better than a paranoid chasing the remnants of the V-2 across 1945 Europe and suspecting World War II was started by a conspiracy. It's the forefather of cyberpunk.

    Also, Gravity's Rainbow was nominagted for a few minor awards, heard of the Hugo and Nebula?

  155. L. Ron Hubbard's "Battlefield Earth" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Best. Unintentional comedy. Ever. ...no, wait, it was just shitty. Nevermind.

  156. Martian Chronicles by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

    Martian Chronicles gets my vote. We had to read in in junior high school, and that book turned my on to the whole SF genre (and doomed me to a life of geekdom)

  157. Re:What?! A geek list with no Tolkien? by Syntax+Heir · · Score: 1
    One root to rule them,

    One grep to find them,

    One cron to bring them all,

    And in the subnet bind them.

    I thought for certain there would be a DNS reference on the last line.

    --
    The greatest hindrance to success is a well-rationalized excuse
  158. LSpace by rjstanford · · Score: 2, Informative

    And if you like pTerry, but you're pretty sure you're not getting all of the jokes (or, better yet, if you actually think you are), you have to check out LSpace (ie: Library Space) and read the annotations. Woefully out of date, they're worth spending a couple of hours on in no uncertain terms.

    --
    You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
  159. Has anyone else even read... by sevenoverzero · · Score: 1

    ...Gravity's Rainbow, by Thomas Pynchon? I don't know if I would call the book necessarily "geeky," but it definitely is the sort that appeals to geek-types. Same with his The Crying of Lot 49.

  160. And then there were none by TractorBarry · · Score: 1

    Well I haven't read the list (come on this is /. after all !) but I bet it doesn't contain my favourite namely "The Great Explosion" (which is actually a fleshed out version of "And Then There Were None") by Eric Frank Russell.

    Absolutely brilliant bit of work and you can even read the shorter version online. Best link I can come up with at the moment is at abelard.org although I did once find a less "garish" (i.e. ad free) version which I now can't seem to track down.

    Ah... if only more people had the sense to live like this :)

    --
    Sky subscribers are morons. They pay to be advertised at !
  161. Yikes, I have 18 of 20 on my shelves! by volts · · Score: 1

    There are many who could be this list, but I don't get Robert Anton Wilson over Bruce Sterling.

  162. The Godless whorde. by rs79 · · Score: 3, Funny

    "is the Lord of the Rings not geeky enough?"

    Fuck no. First, the sheer length of the tome is enough to prevent almost anybody from reading it. Second, it's a *fairy story*, the sort of thing 9 year old girls obsess on. Geek books have science, spies or aliens in them.

    Besides, the correlation between "geek" and "bible" seems to be awfully low from my observations.

    --
    Need Mercedes parts ?
  163. 132 people voted?!?! by paranerd · · Score: 1

    132 people voted?!?! And that's supposed to be indicitive of exactly what?
     
      Now if it was a slashdot poll that sample space would carry some statistacal validity.

  164. Ellison's Missing? by MidWorldOddity · · Score: 1

    Where is Harlan Ellison? Not only did I consider his stories "geeky", but half of them made me question my own existence, and the other half ("I have no mouth but I must scream") about made me wet my pants.

  165. Peter F. Hamilton by blooba · · Score: 1

    How on earth could such a list exist without the name Peter F. Hamilton at or near its top? I am outraged! If you've not read his Reality Dysfunction and Neutronium Alchemist series, drop everything you're doing and read them now.

  166. Thud by DarkClown · · Score: 1

    Speaking of things discworld did anyone think that Thud! is an indication that the discworld series needs to wrap up? It's the first one to come along that I've actually almost stopped reading. Don't get me wrong - I'm a big fan....

    1. Re:Thud by Walsfeo · · Score: 1

      I liked it, mostly. It's sure not one I'd pass off to folks as a first exposure to the setting. While I don't think it's a sign that Diskworld needs to be decommissioned so much as that it may be time to let the Night Watch rest for a bit.

  167. Dhalgren by Winlin · · Score: 1

    Because if you managed to get all the way through it, you were a dedicated SF fan with way too much free time. Now thats a good partial definition of a geek:)

    1. Re:Dhalgren by Concertina · · Score: 1

      I cannot tell you how many times I picked up this book, read three lines, and stopped reading it, only to come back to it weeks later. It took me a great deal of effort to read. Don't regret the final immersion in the least, when I finally just dove in to it.

      Dhalgren is a mind-blowing, surreal experience. Highly recommended.

    2. Re:Dhalgren by Malacca · · Score: 1

      And if you actually managed to get to the end, Hamilton invokes a deus ex machina to get himself out of the corner he managed to paint himself into.

      Don't get me wrong, I liked it well enough, but I wouldn't rate it *that* highly

  168. Hard to take this list seriously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when there's only 132 people voting on it. (as of now, anyway)

  169. Vinge! by Khelder · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I agree that Vinge should be represented, but I'd favor A Deepenss in the Sky over A Fire Upon the Deep. I thought the pacing in Fire was a bit slow at times, but Deepness was better in that respect. I also thought Focus was really interesting and the society around it really well done.

  170. Young...and the definition if questionable by Mycroft+Holmes+IV · · Score: 1

    Are we talking about authors who are geeks, or authors who write about geeks?

    Don't get wrong, I love Neuromancer. But Gibbons isn't a geek. Verne wrote a story (20,000 leagues under the sea) and include LONG (boring?) passages of every known fish as they travelled the world's oceans. Like Heinlein, they both wrote stories based in Mathmatics (Verne calculated escape velocity).

  171. Shockwave rider not counted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What? Shockwave rider, the book that first publicised the idea of a self-replicating, self-distributing computer program, aka a work, not in the list? Even worse, "not cared about"? Bah.

  172. Catcher in the Rye? by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Holden Caufield is the ultimate social cretin. Started the new gendre of the cretin and Salinger's career. Supposedly stimulated several assassins like Mark Chapman.

    1. Re:Catcher in the Rye? by sesshomaru · · Score: 1

      Don't forget, he's also a sort of a role model for The Laughing Man (Class A Super Hacker) in Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex.

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
  173. the Mars Trilogy (Kim Stanley Robinson) by sciuro · · Score: 1

    can't believe there's not something by KSR in there. the Mars Trilogy is (imho) the most geeky, covering any number of sciences. maybe too political, though?

    another great one is "The Years of Rice and Salt", wel worth a read (an alternative history based on Europe being hard hit by the black death, and science as we know it being developed elsewhere... neal stephenson's baroque cycle reminded me of it at times.

    both highly recommended.

    -duncan

    1. Re:the Mars Trilogy (Kim Stanley Robinson) by Concertina · · Score: 1
      another great one is "The Years of Rice and Salt", wel worth a read (an alternative history based on Europe being hard hit by the black death, and science as we know it being developed elsewhere... neal stephenson's baroque cycle reminded me of it at times.


      Funny that you should say that. I read both "Years of Rice and Salt" and the Baroque cycle in very close proximity and had a similar impression. I loved Years of Rice and Salt ... well-written, easy to just pick up and read thanks to the heavily chapterized format, and non-traditional plot structure to keep things interesting.

      -Concertina
  174. Geeks apparently don't like to read novels... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "1984" and "A Brave New World" are required reading in most American High Schools.
    While I think both books are excellent, the fact that both are ranked #2 and #3
    infers that most geeks don't like to read fiction beyond what they're told to.

  175. Nighshade by perdu · · Score: 1

    Not well known, but a great geek read. What's not to like about a novel featuring a vampire on Mars, a somewhat kinky human/android meld, genetically engineered people and animals. And an awesome entertainment industry!

    --
    You only use 2% of your DNA
  176. Should be - Old Geek Top Novels ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those novels are mostly old and read by older geeks.

    For me "Ender's game" and "Harry Potter" are the two most obvious omissions on the list ...

  177. Stanislaw Lem is missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every geek needs to have read the writing of Stanislaw Lem. Given they are old and I do not know if there is a proper english translation, but they are the end of science fiction, as they are the ultimate science fiction and the ultimate parody of science fiction. Nothing similar has ever been there.

  178. What, no "Headcrash"? by danlyke · · Score: 1

    The list itself is pretty good, but I can't believe that 441 comments later nobody's mentioned "Headcrash" by Bruce Bethke. Not necessarily high literature, but a must-read if you've ever tried to recover from sysadminery.

  179. I agree by imsabbel · · Score: 1

    Also, deepness has AWESOME use of large scale steganography, plus the whole concept of "focused" people for intelligence amplification.
    One of my favorite books all time (which should make it a geek book :D)

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  180. Or _When Harlie Was One_ by David Gerrold. by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

    I actually liked that one a bit better than P-1, I think.

    --
    Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
    The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
  181. I.R. Not the Geek? by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1

    Well at least someone in the comments mentioned Ursula le Guin's "The Dispossessed".

    Nothing was listed for Elaine Cunningham http://www.elainecunningham.com/ even though she did both some of the best D&D books of all time and some Star Trek. IMHO The Songs and Swords series should have been there.

    I don't know wtf they were thinking by not including "Red Mars Green Mars Blue Mars", Kim Stanley Robinson. Her novel Icehenge gave me chills.

    --
    Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
  182. What About Robert Sheckley? by saudadelinux · · Score: 1

    Dude was Douglas Adams before Douglas Adams was, in the same sort of way Gahan Wilson was Gary Larson before Gary was.

    --
    I didn't think the house band in Hell would play this badly.
  183. Heinlein, Pohl by Tony · · Score: 1

    Heinlein's best geek was Manny, from his best book, "The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress." He was definitely a geek. And, barring RAH's usual sexism, it is an excellent work.

    And Pohl should have had Gateway on the list.

    Gibson. Feh. I have tried to read Neoromancer probably a dozen times. It sucks, at least it sucks for me.

    --
    Microsoft is to software what Budweiser is to beer.
    1. Re:Heinlein, Pohl by flyinwhitey · · Score: 1

      You know, that's funny, because I liked Neuromancer and I wouldn't wipe my ass with anything by either of the author's you listed.

      Primarily because I'm not a sheep who insists sci-fi authors are good when they aren't, such as the two you listed.

      --
      How pathetic are you that you follow me from topic to topic and waste all your mod points at once modding me down?
  184. Brave New World! by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

    I was both pleasantly surprised and struck by the irony of seeing Brave New World come in at #3 on a "Top 10 Novels read by people of a certain subculture" list. Good to see geeks are getting their Huxleyan philosophy and the important insights into the modern world it brings.

    Now if only people would read Island. That's the one that tells us what we should be doing.

  185. scifi v. fantasy by Shirlockc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Checking the list and it seems almost all the books are more scifi than fantasy. Tolkein, Narnia are fantasies so maybe that's why they didn't make the list.

  186. straining my budget by arabagast · · Score: 1

    man, this story is straining my budget. I'm just filling up my amazon shopping cart with all the great books that have been mentioned in this thread. This is why I love slashdot, you always find so much interesting in the comments (sometimes, that is).

    --
    Doolittle : ...What is your one purpose in life?
    Bomb no.20 : To explode of course.
  187. H Beam Piper by whitehatlurker · · Score: 1
    Yeah, "Uprising" was a great read, but all his stuff is. My favourite Piper story would probably be "Lord Kalvin", but surely "Space Vikings" would be more akin to some of the others listed in the g'g'parent.

    However, in keeping with the theme, I think his geekiest would be "Cosmic Computer".

    I do agree that he should have a place in any serious SF list, but a "geeky" list? Not so much.

    --
    .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
  188. The White Demon by BodhiCat · · Score: 0

    No Elric? Dark fantasy hero who winds up killing and destroying everyone and anything he loves in the pursuit of knowledge. What could be more geeky than that? Can't wait for the movie, if it ever gets filmed.

  189. My nomination... by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 1

    ...is for Daniel Keys Moran's novel, The Long Run. I don't think it's been in print for years, which is probably the only reason it's not on the list. I'd also recommend the other novels of the Continuing Time, including Emerald Eyes, but The Long Run is a good start.

    Sixty-two thousand years before the birth of Yeshua ha Notzri, whom later humans knew as Jesus the Christ, the Time Wars ended, for reasons which no sentient being now knows. With that ending, the Continuing Time began.

  190. Ender's Game by mr100percent · · Score: 1

    What? No Ender's Game? Not even listed in the first page of Comments?

  191. I can't believe nobody mentioned: by Sippan · · Score: 1

    House of Leaves, by Mark Z. Danielewski.
    Just like "Gödel, Escher, Bach" it manages to be an awesome geek book and a bestseller.

    --
    Frog blast the vent core.
  192. Crivens! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ach, ye great gaggle of bletherin' scunners! The Wee Free Men are the greatest, and if ye don't agree I'll bash ye in the foreheed wi me ane skull and steal all yehr 'special sheep liniment'.

    Nae Keng! Nae Quin! We'll no be fooled again!

  193. I second this as well... by cr0sh · · Score: 1
    I am currently reading it - found a used copy at a library book sale (do I get my geek badge of honor now?). I have found it to be very interesting - it is at once both "futuristic" and "contemporary" at the same time. I guess I should say that while at the time it was published, it was meant as science-fiction, the passage of time and norms has made much of it seem like "present-day". Some things were missed, as is to be expected - but on the whole it is a great read. An excellent complement to novels from Sterling or Gibson. I tend to wonder if anyone has actually implemented a software version of the "fencing" game described in the book?

    By the way - if you want to really delve into the question of "where did cyberpunk and transhumanism spring from?", a good place to start is with "Future Shock" by Alvin Toffler (from which Brunner notes he gained inspiration for Shockwave Rider) and "Optimism: One" by FM Esfandiary (arguably one of the first, if not the first, books to define the philosophy and ideas behind transhumanism). Some weird (as well as provocative and prescient) shit came out of the backend of the 1960's and the hippie era; these two authors and books are by no means the only examples...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  194. Be aware that Schofield is a Microsoft shill by nukenerd · · Score: 1
  195. Neil Gaiman? "American Gods"?! by npsimons · · Score: 1
    WTF? I read "American Gods". It was crap. Not the worst thing I've ever read, but pap fiction nonetheless. I had heard rave reviews of it for years and finally decided to pick it up. Unfortunately, I also bought it. I'm convinced now that the rave reviews were all Neil Gaiman comic book fanboys, and if there's one thing I can't stand, it's comic books masquerading as serious fiction.


    Same thing for "Small Gods". I love Pratchett, but "Small Gods" was pretty pathetic. Maybe I just can't relate to any "gods" novels because I'm an atheist, but I loved "Good Omens", and plenty of other Pratchett stuff ("Soul Music" comes to mind).


    Plus, where's Egan's "Diaspora"? Or Stephenson's "Cryptonomicon"? I'll admit I'm not that well read in sci-fi, but Diaspora and Cryptonomicon are both geekier and beat "American Gods" hands down.

    1. Re:Neil Gaiman? "American Gods"?! by npsimons · · Score: 1

      Okay, I feel really stupid - they did have Cryptonomicon on there, I just missed it. I still think Neil Gaiman sucks, though ;)

  196. Aircraft accident account. by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

    'Freefall' by Hoffer is an awesome book which is actually non-fiction but reads like a novel.

    It details the events leading up to, and covering a Canada Air Boeing 767 that ran out of fuel in mid-flight. But it wasn't all drama - he went into GREAT detail about how the internal systems of the plane are tied together. Describing everything from the fuel quantity processors, to the electrical distribution systems, to the metric conversion at the time, to the multitude of human errors that caused the incident.

    A MUST read for ANY and ALL ENGINEERS!!!

    Check it out here:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0312922744/104-36 39831-6353510?v=glance&n=283155&s=books&v=glance

    --
    Libertas in infinitum
  197. Gleaning the Cube by Isaac Asimov by jeromemck · · Score: 1

    Gleaning the Cube by Isaac Asimov, the inventor of satellites, the laws of robots, etc. It interested me intensely at the time. Doctor Who is also good geek literature with its young lady apprentices, Cybermen and a Police Box that was a time and space craft. --- Coder of computers for over two decades. http://dreamfrequency.com/

  198. The stars my destination aka Tiger! Tiger! by otomo_1001 · · Score: 1

    Alfred Bester was a master at his craft. I still to this day love reading this book.

    If only it would get made into a feature film. If any book could ever be easily made into a movie this is it. But it could be so much more. Not sure how one would go about the last part of the book when Gully's senses are reversed. (not much of a spoiler)

    To this day the word jaunt now seems so much crappier because I cannot jaunt in that way.

    Oh well.

  199. diversity is grand by RaymondRuptime · · Score: 1

    There are so many choices, narrowing down to a short list will always be controversial--and a good opportunity for reflection and diversifying your to-read list. I enjoyed thinking about this, and playing with the distinction between "geek novel" and sci-fi. FWIW, here's my (alphabetized) top 10 list:

    Anderson & Beeson, Assemblers of Infinity
    Asimov, Foundation
    Card, Ender's Game
    Clarke, 2001: A Space Odyssey
    Lem, Solaris
    McDevitt, The Engines of God
    Miller, A Canticle for Leibowitz
    Niven, Ringworld
    Reed, Marrow
    Stephenson, Snow Crash

    Anyone want to try "best geek novels translated into English"?

  200. My list [ I bet that's ! original! ] by peetm · · Score: 1

    As well as the 'normal' - The William Gibsons that follow-on or revolve around Neuromancer in some way, e.g., Count Zero, Mona Lisa Overdrive, Johhny Mnemonic (or was that the film?), Burning Chrome. Dan Brown - Digital Fortress Alan Dean Foster - Dark Star Peirs Anthony - Macroscope (I fell in love with Afra!) Counterfiet World - Daniel Galouye Contact - Carl Sagan Tau Zero - Poul Anderson Ring World - Larry Niven The Lure - Bill Napier

    --
    @peetm
  201. What about Michael Crichton? by run2stone · · Score: 1

    Andromeda Strain, Terminal Man, Jurassic Park, Sphere, Timeline, etc. Something of his should be on the list.

  202. boy, talk about right over your head! whoosh! by Xtifr · · Score: 1

    > No, there's just many different types of SF.

    So, say, Tolkien is SF? I don't think you're going to get much buy-in for that theory (although I can, when I'm in the mood, argue in support of that thesis -- see Clarke's law.)

    > There's people who focus the SF label to what used to be called "hard SF"

    Those people reject the notion that EITHER of "Creatures of Light and Darkness" OR "Lord of Light" are SF. I'm propounding a much more moderate (and much more widely, if informally, accepted) definition here. One that many people I know have found pretty easy to accept once they hear it, even if they've never articulated it themselves.

    > most fans laugh at those folks and put dirt in their hair.

    Most people laugh at SF fans in general and put dirt in their hair. So what does that prove?

    > In the middle is "science fantasy" and a dozen other subgenres.

    'SFunny, but in my experience, the ones who insist the hardest about labels like "Science Fantasy" are the ones who insist that only "hard SF" is "real SF", i.e. the people you were just complaining about.

    > Read what what you want to read.

    I do, thank you. I read SF, fantasy, mysteries, mainstream, and other categories, and enjoy them all (or, at least, certain instances of "them all"). Categorization is not rejection (except among the kind of idiots who enjoy rubbing dirt in people's hair).

    > It really not worth having an "arrogant opinion" about.

    ANYTHING worth anything is worth having an arrogant opinion about. If you don't have opinions (or if you're one of those pathetic losers who only has "humble opinions"), you ain't worth squat in my book. If you're going to have opinions, stop being a wuss, and make it an arrogant one! People who think opinions aren't worth being arrogant about are the people whose hair I rub dirt into! :p ;)

  203. Re:Ayn Rand by oblivion95 · · Score: 1

    Joking or not, you missed the irony. Ayn Rand became so stanuchly anti-collectivist because of her experience of the onset of totalitarianism in Russia. Her mother helped her to leave the country when contemporaries, including teachers and classmates, began to disappear in the middle of the night. Rand (then Rosenbaum) was an independent-thinker from a young age, but she was mainly just a lover of romantic cinema until the Bolsheviks ruined her country. Rand honestly believed that the tiniest intrusion of collectivism could lead to the persecution and deaths of people who like to speak their minds. Your "joke" was exactly the reason why she felt the way she did. I recommend the Oscar-nominated documentary titled "A Sense of Life," a biography of Ayn Rand. Ignore her flawed philosophy. (The flaw is the assumption that we are rational beings, when clearly we are animals foremost.) The first third of the film will give you some compassion for her deep fears.

  204. Reading Stephenson by n54 · · Score: 1

    Disclaimer: I haven't read any part of the Quicksilver triology but I've read most of his other stuff (if not all of it). Favourites are Cryptonomicon and The Diamond Age.

    Personally I'm too occupied thinking about the details and consequences of his ideas/concepts to notice the quality of writing. I know this must sound strange when replying to your complaints about filler material :)

    So I guess I more or less unconsciously filter out any filler material (but it doesn't always work so the line has to be drawn somewhere and I'm never again buying anything new written by Peter Hamilton unless it makes shockwaves through nerddom (not likely)).

    --
    this comment is provided "as is" and without any express or implied legibility or congruity [...]
  205. Charles Stross, Accelerando by nittacci · · Score: 1

    I think I may have stumbled upon the ultimate geek book. Charles Stross writes like English is his second language. Assembler is his first. It's been a while since a book has made me feel like I dropped some slightly speedy acid. I highly recommend this book, but be prepared to get a headache if you read it for more than 30 minutes at a time.