Slashdot Mirror


Law of Unintended Consequences Strikes Grocers

netbuzz writes "The law of unintended consequences is taking a chomp out of grocery chain profits as more stores transition from human clerks to self-service checkout technology, thus reducing the time shoppers spend in line and under the temptation of impulse items. That's the upshot of research being released tomorrow by IHL Consulting Group in Franklin, Tenn., which provides market analysis to the retail industry and its IT vendors."

697 comments

  1. My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by plover · · Score: 5, Funny
    Now that they mention it, I know I've never made an impulse purchase at the self-checkout lanes at Home Depot (but I have at the regular checkout lines.) That's the only store I regularly shop at that uses self-checkout.

    However, I refuse to use self-checkout if I have to wait behind any customers. The cashier lanes are always faster, even when they have a line. I can't believe how stupid most people become once they enter the self-checkout lanes. It's scan-scan-swipe, people; in-and-out in about 45 seconds or less; how frickin' hard is that to understand?!? I'm not talking about the people who get stalled because their credit card was rejected, I'm talking about the ones who have to stop and read the full screen after scanning every damn packet of washers in their cart; or who don't seem to understand that the barcodes have to be presented to the lasers, and that no matter how long you stare at a barcode, the scanner won't pick it up. Morons.

    Of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong.

    --
    John
    1. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by PresidentEnder · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I work at Home Depot, as a cashier. I can back up all of parent's statements; people lose about fifty IQ points when faced with the self checkout. That's why ours have a cashier supervising them.

      Think about it. When you're in the self-checkout, you're focused on getting things done, scanning your items (or staring at the barcode wondering what's wrong); when you're at a regular cashier, he's the one doing the work. You sit there and... what? Look around, listen to his dumb jokes, and (more importantly) notice the overpriced altoid knock-offs and useless 37-cent clamps.

      That, or it could have something to do with the fact that there usually aren't any impulse items right next to (or in front of) the self check-out registers. Just maybe.

      --
      I used to carry a bottle of whiskey for snake bite. And two snakes. -Nefarious Wheel
    2. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by ejdmoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I always proposed a training and certification program for self-checkout lanes. You have to scan your membership (which works at different stores of course) then you can checkout. That way granny won't be wondering why she can't place her items right back into her cart.

    3. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by plover · · Score: 1
      That, or it could have something to do with the fact that there usually aren't any impulse items right next to (or in front of) the self check-out registers. Just maybe.

      Well, you do have stuff in the end caps. And our local store has a folding table set up in the aisle approaching the self-checkouts with clearance merchandise (things like returned circular saws for $15) that I like to look at. I suppose if I were waiting in line for a self-checkout lane I might browse the goods, but like I said, that isn't going to happen with me. I'm much happier waiting for someone who knows what he or she is doing than to take my chances behind a line full of J. Random Lusers.

      --
      John
    4. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by synaptik · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Both you and the GP forgot to mention: the assinine weight scales on those infernal self-checkout machines. I get so tired of hearing "PLEASE PLACE ITEM IN THE BAGGING AREA!" when I've ALREADY PLACED THE FRICKIN' SCANNED ITEM IN THE FRICKIN' BAGGING AREA! You also hear this one when you've filled up all the space on the weigh-scale, and need to move those filled bags back to the shopping cart, to make room for the rest of the crap you've still needing to scan.

      Nor did you mention its complement, "PLEASE REMOVE ANOMOLOUS ITEM FROM BAGGING AREA!" just because it thinks the last thing I put there weighs too much.

      Damn, those are annoying! It is impossible to get any reasonable throughput on those $#@! self-checkout stands. It routinely takes 2x-3x longer than necessary-- especially if you're buying those little packages of 5 washers-- because of that stupid weight scale. (Yes, I know about the "skip bagging" button, but (a) that's almost just as annoying, and (b) in many retailers, if you hit that button too often, the machine locks up until a human can come make certain you're not trying to steal.

      Seriously... just migrate to RFID already, and be done with this weight-scale nonsense!

      --
      HSJ$$*&#^!#+++ATH0
      NO CARRIER
    5. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by evilviper · · Score: 5, Insightful
      That's why ours have a cashier supervising them.

      Here's an idea...

      CLOSE THE GOD-DAMMED SELF-CHECKOUT MACHINES, AND PUT THAT LADY BEHIND A CASH REGISTER, SOLVING BOTH PROBLEMS FOR FAR LESS MONEY. IT MAKES NO SENSE AT HOME DEPOT, OF ALL PLACES, SITTING THERE FOR 2 FULL MINUTES TELLING YOU TO PUT YOUR (FEATHER-WEIGHT OR GIGANTIC AND MASSIVE) ITEM IN THE BAG ON THE SENSOR, BEFORE LETTING YOU GET THE HELL OUT OF THERE.

      Of course I may just a little bitter. It is, though, almost gratifying to see my local Home Depot's self-checkout lines entirely abandonded, while the lines at the two open (manned) cash registers go winding through the isles. Gratifying to see it once or twice, that is, as the longer lines and moronic self-checkout machines make me shop at Lowes, now, where they have no self-checkout machines, few cashiers (more than two, of course) and yet practically never any waiting lines.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    6. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by CosmeticLobotamy · · Score: 5, Funny

      I refuse to use them because of the above-mentioned need for your single cotton ball to register as exactly .000001 ounces before it'll let you move on, as well as the equally annoying deafening voice telling me to scan my next item every damn time. Girl-that-lives-in-the-machine, I know where the frigging change is dispensed. And if you're so worried I won't see it, move the damn change dispensor, and stop yelling at me!

    7. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Detritus · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I'm not a professional grocery clerk, so don't bitch about my speed. I often have to look at the package to see where the UPC symbol is located, or unwrinkle it so it will scan properly. Sometimes I have to key in the barely readable number below the UPC symbol when it doesn't scan. Then there's the produce. I picked up several onions, and, no, I'm not an expert on onions. The computer wants to know which of eight types of onions I'm buying. Hell if I know, the round ones.

      The store is wasting my time so they can cut their head count. Fuck them.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    8. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Simonetta · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's scan-scan-swipe, people; in-and-out in about 45 seconds or less; how frickin' hard is that to understand?!?

          I'm always the person who messes up in the self-checkout line.

          I'm the one who presses the Spanish language button by mistake instead of the English. No big deal; but I don't know any Spanish. I'm learning grocery line Spanish, though.

          I'm the one who has a jar with 300 pennies that I'm feeding into the coin slot one at a time because I don't want to have to pay a 15% penality at the coin counting machine.

          I'm the one who can't tell the difference between the different types of lettuce, press the wrong type, get overcharged, and insist that the cashier void just that one item.

          I'm the one who buys one six-pack of soda pop and ends up running one can through the scanner six times, get overcharged, and insist that the cashier void just those six items.

          I'm the one who doesn't know the difference between a credit card and a debit card.

          Now, don't you'all just hate me?

    9. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best part about your comment is the replies, wherin we hear from all the smart people. The self-checkout experts. I'm bettin that at least quite a few of them are the retards that frustrate me when I'm in line behind them.

      You know, the everybody else is the problem types. Nothing is perfect. I've memorized every screen of the stupid thing and can hit the buttons faster than the machine can speak the first word of its statement, but you don't see me calling for a redesign of the machine or society to accomodate me. Jesus freakin' Koresh, man. Just buy your stuff and leave. Quit overanalyzing.

    10. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by friedmud · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If you are filling up the bagging area then.... YOU ARE TRYING TO BUY TOO MUCH STUFF USING SELF CHECKOUT!

      Self-checkout should be _strictly_ reserved for people who have about 5 things _max_. When I see people with a cart full of groceries pull up to a self-checkout station I just laugh... it will take them _forever_...

      On the other hand, I am almost always the guy that is standing in line with just _one_ thing to buy... I have it in my left hand and my debit card in my right. It takes me all of 30 seconds to whip through a self checkout line. Everyone else needs to get the _hell_ out of the way! ;-)

      Friedmud

    11. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by ThousandStars · · Score: 1
      I can't believe how stupid most people become once they enter the self-checkout lanes. It's scan-scan-swipe, people; in-and-out in about 45 seconds or less; how frickin' hard is that to understand?!?

      Apparently I'm one of the stupid people, because I've come to avoid these self-checkout lanes at the grocer. It takes a long time of digging through menus to find the proper fruit; the loyalty cards (I use a phone number I found in the phone book, BTW) don't always specify whether they want the leading digit 1 or not, and I've never had a problem at the regular cashiers' stands; when I try to put an item I've just scanned into my bag or backpack, the machine instructs me not to; when I'm ready to pay, it frequently won't accept my cash. Using credit cards -- which I don't do with loyalty cards, BTW -- is also sometimes a pain in the ass if the machine won't accept a swipe or the location of the credit card slot isn't obvoius. At QFC's it isn't.

      For me, the efficiency of these systems is often questionable, particularly because of fruits. So I guess I am one of the people you describe. Personally, I think the designers of the systems are morons -- shouldn't they be making it easier for me, rather than me make it easier for them?

    12. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by adavidw · · Score: 1
      Now, don't you'all just hate me?


      No, not really. All of the things you mention ('cept one) are totally legitimate consequences of poorly designed man-machine interfaces.

      I'm the one who has a jar with 300 pennies that I'm feeding into the coin slot...


      This one, however, just makes you an ass.
    13. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, for I use to work at Home Depot and was a backup cashier (until I reported bait and switch to the companies ethic hotline and got fired because of it). People are dumb. At the self check out, they will have the largest items that they can hardly pick up and try so hard to scan them. It is a sight that is aumsing to watch, and if I felt bad for them I would offer to scan it using a portable gun scanner. Some people refuse the directions that the machine tells them and other people try so hard to find barcodes when they do not exist (like dealing with single bots, washers, etc) and somehow rather just stare at it or the screen instead of asking for help. At the store I worked people ignored the impuse buys that were placed around the self-checkout, unless they are gift cards.

    14. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yea, I am building a vaction home on my spare time, and I am needing to go to the DIY stores at least twice a week. I stopped shopping at Home Depot just for the fact that they only have 1 real cash register open, with 20 people in line. (Ever try to self-check out with a load of 50 different 8' to 16' lumber pieces and a cart full of 90# bags???)

      Lowes has no self checkout things and always has at least 4 people working to check you out. I have averaged at least $500 a week (sometimes a lot more) for the last year to get my stuff. I expect that if I am spending that much money somewhere every week to have some service. Because of this lack of service to save $7/hour, Home Depot has lost my business.

    15. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Silicon+Jedi · · Score: 1

      No, some of us have had the unfortunate experience of being cashiers in previous jobs. I Burn through self-checkout. I have to shoo away the "helpful" attendant who likes to put cleaning supplies in with fruits. That being said, I now use Peapod and I am blissfully removed from groceries

    16. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Y0tsuya · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Our local HD added self-checkout lines about 2 years ago. Lowe's followed suit a few months afterwards. Then it was Albertson's turn. I actually liked the self-checkout lines since they're usually shorter and people are getting the hang of it.

      I think sometimes people just get spaced out and are not looking at the right indicators/icons/whatever. Last week I spaced out at a 4-way stop for a minute "waiting for the light to turn green". Fortunately there were no cars behind me.

    17. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by imdx80 · · Score: 1
      "If you are filling up the bagging area then.... YOU ARE TRYING TO BUY TOO MUCH STUFF USING SELF CHECKOUT!"

      Maybe so, but if the choice is take full basket (20+ items) to self checkout and deal with lack of room in bagging area or stand in one of the 3/4 queues of 5+ people with full trolleys. I'll be the one blocking up a self checkout.

    18. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      wow. way to overblow something.

      At one Albertson's they actually have a 9 item limit at the self-checkout. also in usual configurations they have 4 self-checkout stations and one person manning them.
      Perhaps the places you've been going to have lower iq's, but I've always managed to get out faster than any of the regular checkout lines.

      I also work at and use several libraries that use the self-checkout machines and these help a great deal as we are always overloaded between checking things in, and out.

      Oh and at the Albertson's there are stands with baskets that have loads of overpriced goodies. I've bought chips, candy, and fruit pies oh my!

    19. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by vought · · Score: 5, Insightful

      On the other hand, I am almost always the guy that is standing in line with just _one_ thing to buy... I have it in my left hand and my debit card in my right. It takes me all of 30 seconds to whip through a self checkout line. Everyone else needs to get the _hell_ out of the way! ;-)

      In most places where self-checkout is available (Home Depot, Albertson's, to name two) you'll find that most people are purchasing many more items than self-checkout was designed for, yet there is no sign indicating a suggested item limit for best results...they've always driven me crazy because I try to move too fast for them - so I hear a lot of "Please place item in the bagging area" and "you have removed an item from the bagging area, then it locks up and the cashier has to come over anyway.

      I think it's fine for it's intended purpose, but trained, competent, (dare I say union) checkers are far more efficient and I'm hoping that will deter grocery chains from deploying too many of these self-checkout lanes. A store with only self-checkout? Well, that'd be a store with a lot of fistfights.

    20. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 2, Funny

      How do you know it was just for a minute? Any fresh and unexplained scars on your body? Have you started having headaches? Trouble sleeping at night? Has your car become magnetized? Just before you spaced out, do you remember seeing anything unusual, such as bright flashing lights from above? Lastly, does your butt hurt?

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    21. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1

      Yeah they are all pretty bad but after enough tries I "learned" the system of my grocery store of choice and now I can move pretty quickly through self-checkout. Send me to a different store and I'll probably be lost again...

    22. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by servognome · · Score: 1

      You're an Asshole.

      :)

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    23. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by packeteer · · Score: 4, Funny

      Everyone else needs to get the _hell_ out of the way! ;-)

      Good ol' America!

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    24. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      useless 37-cent clamps.

      You know, those are great nipple clamps...
      Home Depot is a deviant's best friend - I'm sure you know that already. It doesn't take a genius to figue out what a couple is up to when they come up to the counter (giggling sometimes) with 50 feet of cotton rope, a 1/2" wooden rod and assorted short lengths of chain...

    25. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by shreevatsa · · Score: 2, Funny
      the lines at the two open (manned) cash registers go winding through the isles.

      Whoa, those are really long lines! At least here, the lines stay on the mainland. ;)


      *throws 'Hint: aisles' and ducks*
    26. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
      The local grocery store here has self-scan checkouts, and they STILL have cashiers standing at the bag-area in order to prevent you from shoplifting. The store has also used the existence of the self-scan area to actually reduce the number of cashiers on duty, so the regular lines are pretty long.

      Many times I have been standing in line at the cashier, and the 'wandering' cashier will come up to me and say "You can take your stuff to the self-scan". I use the usual reply:

      "Do I get a discount for using the self-scan?"

      Of course, they say there isn't, "Well, then I'll stay right here then".

      As far as I'm concerned, if you want me to do your job for you, I get a discount. Otherwise I'll stay in line and make you run every piece of crap over that scanner. All the self-scan is is an excuse to not pay cashiers. Demand a discount if they don't want to pay people to checkout your stuff.

    27. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by timelorde · · Score: 5, Funny

      A store with only self-checkout? Well, that'd be a store with a lot of fistfights.

      All right, dinner and a show!

    28. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by NihilEst · · Score: 2, Insightful

      OK, Homer. Do me a HUGE favor. Have your hardware geniuses fix those FREAKING SCALES ("bagging area") so they don't vary with barometric pressure or somebody walking by on the floor (no kidding): that's what triggers those "PLEASE PLACE/REMOVE ITEM IN/FROM BAGGING AREA" messages. I know you guys need to stop people from stealing, but please: weighing products to the milligram is just a little extreme. Funny, the conveyor belts at Stop & Shop aren't that sensitive.

      --
      Founding member: He-Man Windoze Hater Club
    29. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by smchris · · Score: 1

      Actually not always scan, scan, swipe. As a one-car urban warrior I mountain biked to the grocery store one weekend while the car was in the shop. I figured self-serve would make sense that once because it would let me balance the bags for the carriers while I scanned. As I discovered, there is a feature (scale?) that halts the process if you take scanned items out of the bag and into another bag. Sort of like, "PUT THAT ITEM BACK WHERE IT BELONGS!" I'm still not sure of the rationale for that function. Maybe I would be tempted to scan it again and charge myself twice? Anyway, it was a disaster and it would have been much smoother to just work with a bag boy.

      Really, aren't IT people in the best position to realize that self-serve is evil? These people losing their jobs aren't going to be retrained as rocket scientists and society isn't better off for their unemployment. And just because we are comfortable interfacing with machines most of the day, that doesn't mean the novelty of interfacing with a cashier occasionally is a bad thing.

    30. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by macwarriorny · · Score: 1

      I shop at Lowe's instead of Home Depot simply because they're point of sale systems are all running KDE on a Linux distro. In fact, all their systems appear to be running KDE.

      --
      Life is such a sweet insanity. The more you learn, the less you know.
    31. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      I won't use self checkout at all until stores start giving me a 2% kickback on my purchases. Why? I'm saving them money by doing the labor that normally would be done by a cashier. I don't work for free.

    32. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by kevinT · · Score: 1

      KDE on a Linux distro. In fact, all their systems appear to be running KDE

      As an IT person having worked on Lowes POS (Point of Sale or Piece of S*&t - either applies), it is written in C running on the AIX in the back office being viewed on an 24x80 character terminal at the point of sale!

      Lowes is getting more and more Self Check out systems (Not in all stores yet because they need to hide failing stores behind all the extra revenue from the new stores they open).

    33. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by indifferent+children · · Score: 4, Informative

      All of the Home Depots that I've seen in Florida have a separate "Contractor Check-Out". If you are buying 50 pieces of lumber, they probably won't ask to see your 1099 to make sure that you are a contractor. Look into it.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    34. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      First off, I'm going to admit this: I'm an idiot. I'm a systems administrator who can design, implement and maintain Windows and Linux networks, script in Perl and VBScript and I turn into a mouth-breathing, tongue-wagging, drooling moron when I get into the self-checkout lane with anything more than a candy bar and bag of potato chips. There are others like me out there in Slashdot-land. You know who you are. You are not alone.
      That said, the design on these things is out of whack, everything's spread out. It's too easy to forget your cash change since where I shop, it's down by my knees. And it's teeeedious to buy fruit and vegetables, scrolling through all those screens trying to find "tomatoes, plum" and wondering if they're all that different from "tomatoes, romano". Press the wrong button and you could be paying more than just a little bit more than should. These things need to be redesigned in a major league way.

      One more point is this, and I think it's the most important point of all, where's the wisdom in designing a checkout area that has all this frustration and anger built into the system? Since when do you get in a self checkout line and feel nice and civil to the guy in front of you who can't tell the difference between the types of apples he has to choose from? If you're the merchant, do you really want your customers feeling rage, impatience, and anger to each other? The more I see these things, the more I think the answer to that last question is "Yes".

    35. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by indifferent+children · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You put yourself through the pain of dealing with an innumerate cashier just to punish the store? Actually, there is a discount for using the self-scan. The store adds their profit margin to the top of their total costs to determine their prices. If people steal shopping carts, the store doesn't just say, "Oh well, no profit this year." If people use the self-checkout lanes, thus reducing the payroll for the store, then the store will likely lower their prices (or more likely, the store will be able to cancel or postpone the next round of price-hikes).

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    36. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by lar3ry · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Here's a suggestion. Scan a dozen items, and then walk away, throwing up your hands in frustration, saying "I can't believe this store wants me to do their job for them!"

      Don't pay, don't try to take your "purchases" with you. If a manager sees you do this, tell them flat out that their "self checkout" sucks, and you will not waste another second in this store that has no concept of "customer service" and that you are taking your business elsewhere.

      You have every right to decide at the last minute that you don't want to make the sale.

      You now have a self-checkout lane that is effectively blocked until a real live human clears out the items from the machine and from the computer tally. That human will probably also have to restock the items, although those items may simply go into a queue area for people whose job is to restock. Either way, it allows you to vent your frustration and make a point. AND... since a real employee has to get involved, it makes the machine slightly less able to become a cost saver.

      Heck, have a group of friends "slam" all the self-checkouts this way as a form of organized protest. Include people from a variety of backgrounds, ages, etc. Do it a few times to a store before the management refuses to let you enter the store, and then go on to the next store. Or... do it to a bunch of stores, round-robin, returning to a store a week and a half later when some other manager is on duty. Lather... rinse... repeat. If possible, tell the local news station what you are doing, and see if you can get other people similarly frustrated to join your cause. (The more people doing this, the better!)

      It's called "customer feedback."

      "This is Carlotta Dryspeckle from WUTM at the local FoodMart, where Ms. Emmageek is staging an unusual protest against the dehumanizing and staff-reducing 'self checkout' system that the FoodMart has recently installed. She and her friends are engaging in what they describe as a harmless demonstration of their dissatisfaction with the system and what the installation of this system says about the FoodMart's view of their customers."

      "Hi, Carlotta. We're staging this protest here, and a few of my friends will be going to the HomeGoods Warehouse to do the same thing there next week."

      "I'm now speaking to Mr. Mertz, the manager on duty here at FoodMart. Tell me, Mr. Mertz, what is your reaction to this groups' protest?"

      "This is a protest? That's incredible. I know we lose a few customers who get frustrated with the machines, but I never figured that anybody might do something like this..."

      (Meanwhile, Ms. Emmageek and her friends are singing _Kumbaya_ or _We Shall Not Be Moved_ in the background...)
      --
      "May I have ten thousand marbles, please?"
    37. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by LoudMusic · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm not a professional grocery clerk, so don't bitch about my speed. I often have to look at the package to see where the UPC symbol is located, or unwrinkle it so it will scan properly. Sometimes I have to key in the barely readable number below the UPC symbol when it doesn't scan. Then there's the produce. I picked up several onions, and, no, I'm not an expert on onions. The computer wants to know which of eight types of onions I'm buying. Hell if I know, the round ones.

      The store is wasting my time so they can cut their head count. Fuck them.


      I completely disagree and find your closing statement to not only be ignorant but assinine.

      If you have items in your basket that you know you will have difficulty with at the self-check line don't use the self-check line. It's not like they're forcing you to. It's there as a convenience to the shopper.

      I for one love the self-check lines. Yes there are people who create bottlenecks, but the longer these devices are in service the more customers who will become accustomed to useing them. And I believe the reason why they often appear abandoned (as someone else mentioned) is not because they're not being used but rather because they are so fast that people spend very little time there. Stand for an hour and watch for yourself during a busy time (perhaps around 6pm on weekdays? I honestly don't know their highwater times) and I'm sure you'll find that a lot of customers breeze through the self-check lines. Someone with more initiative than myself could even check to see the 'rate of items scanned' by the cluster of self-checks monitored by one employee versus an employee-operated checkout line. Our Kroger (grocery store) has four self-checks with one employee - I would imagine during busy hours the throughput of four self-checks is about 50% faster than a single lane employee-operated checkout. In self-check you're dealing with a bunch of smaller quantities, less nimble operators, and a bunch more transactions which take roughly the same amount of time no matter who's operating the machine. But it's all going four at a time.

      --
      No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    38. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by clacke · · Score: 1

      What's the customer advantage of the self-checkout if you still need to scan and bag groceries at the checkout? The Swedish systems let you bag and scan as you go through the store, and the checkout is simply: hand in the scanner, pay the groceries and be merry on your way. Regardless if you bought four bags of stuff or just a pack of razorblades it takes 20 seconds. Never need to stand in line. Excellent.

    39. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by crawling_chaos · · Score: 1

      In all fairness, it isn't that simple at the grocery store, as the fresh produce is rarely bar-coded which means working the menus to find your lettuce, cucumbers, and tomatoes. If I see anyone who's eating healthy in the self-checkout line, I head for the cashiers as well. If all I see is frozen pizza and soda (i.e. 90% of the time), I figure I can help them find the bar codes.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    40. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, I am almost always the guy that is standing in line with just _one_ thing to buy... I have it in my left hand and my debit card in my right.

      Ahhh, so you're the idiot who uses his debit card to buy a 25 cent bag of washers... :-p

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    41. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by AcidLacedPenguiN · · Score: 2, Insightful

      man, would it ever suck to be the minimum wager that the manager makes clean out the self-checkout.
      I bet you could also convince the store's cashiers to quit as a form of protest. Then you could even burn down the building in protest! and piss on the ashes!
      Is overboard a strong enough word for this?

      --
      disclaimer: I've been known to store numbers in my ass for which to dig out when quantities are required.
    42. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by bcattwoo · · Score: 1
      If you are filling up the bagging area then.... YOU ARE TRYING TO BUY TOO MUCH STUFF USING SELF CHECKOUT!

      Self-checkout should be _strictly_ reserved for people who have about 5 things _max_. When I see people with a cart full of groceries pull up to a self-checkout station I just laugh... it will take them _forever_...

      Well, at my home depot it is common for there to be only one (often not even that) regular checkout lane open.

      Recently I was at BJ's and my purchases included several bags of ice. I was leery of scanning the bags of ice since the barcode was a squished up mess, but the two manned checkouts were pretty stacked up. The scanner timed out on me on the first bag but eventually I got through, leaving a nice wet mess for the next customer.

    43. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by ultranova · · Score: 5, Funny

      unzip;strip;touch;finger;mount;fsck;more;yes;unm ount;sleep

      This should be:

      unzip && strip && touch && finger & mount && ( ( fsck && more && yes ) ; umount ) ; sleep

      When the next step depends on the success of the previous step, you must check the return value of that previous step. Otherwise your code will behave erraneously and possibly even make the end user switch providers.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    44. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      At one of our local grocery stores, the self-checkout lines include full-fledged conveyors, and items are validated as they move along the conveyor toward the bagging area. The only time you have to tear yourself away from the excitement of scanning your own items is when your twelve cereal boxes have all fallen over on the conveyor and stacked themselves in a nice lengthwise fashion all the way back to the item validating widget. With this setup I can buy a full complement of groceries with few, if any, problems.

    45. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by uncanny · · Score: 1
      CLOSE THE GOD-DAMMED SELF-CHECKOUT MACHINES, AND PUT THAT LADY BEHIND A CASH REGISTER,
      except a lot of places will use one cashier for multiple self checkout machines, and unless she has 4 sets of arms, eyes, etc, this isn't such a great solution is it mr "I NEED CAPS TO MAKE INVALID POINTS"
    46. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by everett · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I wouldn't try to do this in America. Any group action that tries to make any sort of societal change is likely to be labelled as terrorism. I suppose in some twisted and sick way this is terrorism of a sort against the store. They're afraid of you causing their customers to leave because you're clogging up their machines, so they make changes (preferably it would be to have people like yourself be requried to pay for your purchase or to restock the shelves yourself as most places only have 'stockers' working three days a week.)

      I never understood why people in America feel they have to make someone else's life shittier just to express some point. How about you write a letter, and you get all your friends to write letters, talking about how displeased you are with the service you received. Likely you will be sent some coupons, and maybe exact some changes. However causing me to have to either A) Wait in a regular check-out lane to make my purchase or B) wait for some minimum wage employee to clean up your mess so that I can use the self-check out will likely lead to me becoming very unhappy with your 'cause' and doing my best to see you all arrested for disturbing the peace.

      -Everett, no longer a grocery store employee.

      --
      Sig withheld to protect the innocent.
    47. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Proudrooster · · Score: 1

      I agree... plus the Home Depot self-checkout isn't intuitive, it has slots all over the place, it doesn't scan ROUND items like copper fittings, and it's SLOW because of the voice synth that reads each price. It is a pile o'crap.

      However, I have found that you can take your pile-o-stuff to the lady that monitors the self checkouts and she will scan everything for you with the wireless scanner just like a real checkout. That works great and is much less frustrating.

    48. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Jimmy+King · · Score: 1
      f you are filling up the bagging area then.... YOU ARE TRYING TO BUY TOO MUCH STUFF USING SELF CHECKOUT!

      Maybe I just have a couple really big things? It's happened to me more than once. I still love the self checkout as long as I don't have to wait behind someone, but there are very valid complaints/problems with it.


      Self-checkout should be _strictly_ reserved for people who have about 5 things _max_. When I see people with a cart full of groceries pull up to a self-checkout station I just laugh... it will take them _forever_...

      I've only ever been to walmarts that have them. It's usually marked as 10 or 20 item max. Now someone with half a brain can still usually even go through 20 items pretty damn quick, but it does increase the problem with filling up the bagging area. A couple gallons of milk, a few boxes of cereal, a gallon of OJ and you're already pressed for space. Should the limit be lower? Perhaps, but that's for walmart to deal with, if it's marked as 10 items, then a person with 10 items (not counting for more obvious things, such as a huge tv or something) should have no qualms about using it.
    49. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by jbrannon · · Score: 1
      If you are filling up the bagging area then.... YOU ARE TRYING TO BUY TOO MUCH STUFF USING SELF CHECKOUT!

      Not in my experience.... I've used those things at my local Wal-mart, and it's impossible to put more than 2 gallons of milk or other beverage on those things. 2 gallons of something is too much stuff?
    50. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by RockModeNick · · Score: 1

      Those 37 cent clamps aren't useless, they're the absolute cheapest way to reduce air throughput from you aquarium air pump to your tank if it bubbles to vigrously. A fancy plastic device to do that same thing costs a number of dollers at pet stores.

    51. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by SenatorOrrinHatch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      BS, those machines are designed like crap. Why not just RFID everything and just let us walk out? I used to get paid for scanning groceries, now they won't even give me a sale price unless I have some stupid card in my wallet (along with about 20 others). Those scanners suck and you have to type in codes for half the shit. Plus if there's any problem it takes 15 minutes to get some dipshit manager to override it.

      --
      The Christian in me says it's wrong, but the corrections officer in me says, 'I love to make a grown man piss himself.'
    52. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      I was once driving on a freeway (in Los Angeles, where there are lots of them) and suddenly "woke up" on a different freeway. I'm of course not saying that I was abducted, I was just thinking about other things and spaced out, but I had absolutely no recollection of making the change. It was rather disconcerting. I believe my actual reaction was "How the fuck did I get here?"

    53. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by jahudabudy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I never understood why people in America feel they have to make someone else's life shittier just to express some point. How about you write a letter, and you get all your friends to write letters, talking about how displeased you are with the service you received.

      Mostly, b/c people in America have no faith that rational, reasonable complaint will receive any attention whatsoever. It is an inherent part of the culture that "the squeaky wheel gets the grease". If you don't make people, corporations, government, etc. pay attention to you, they will not. And to be honest, sometimes this is true. The problem is that mouth-breathers dimly grasp this truth, and then go and misapply it in inappropriate situations in inappropriate manners.

      --
      ...sometimes, in order to hurt someone very badly, you have to tell that person terrible lies. - PA
    54. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by CodeArtisan · · Score: 1

      In most places where self-checkout is available (Home Depot, Albertson's, to name two) you'll find that most people are purchasing many more items than self-checkout was designed for, yet there is no sign indicating a suggested item limit for best results...they've always driven me crazy because I try to move too fast for them - so I hear a lot of "Please place item in the bagging area" and "you have removed an item from the bagging area, then it locks up and the cashier has to come over anyway.

      In our local Stop & Shop supermarket, they run self-checkout like regular checkouts i.e. they have a couple of lanes for 12 items or less, and a couple of lanes for 'regular' loads. Seems to wrok pretty well, although I am with the other posters in that if there is *anybody* in front of me I will just go straight to a live person.

    55. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by LainTouko · · Score: 1
      when you're at a regular cashier, he's the one doing the work. You sit there and... what? Look around, listen to his dumb jokes, and (more importantly) notice the overpriced altoid knock-offs and useless 37-cent clamps.

      Well, I don't know about you, but I always pack my own shopping.

    56. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by decsnake · · Score: 1

      I built my own house too and eventually I found a better solution to the Home Depot probem than going to Lowes. Its your local independent lumberyard that caters to the trade. There's two in my area. One offers free delivery on a $300 purchase and the other on $500. They generally can deliver the same day and at the very latest next working day. In addition the quality of their lumber and millwork are better. I'm sure you've wasted plenty of time trying to find 20 (or 200!) straight 2x4s at Lowes. Both of the big box stores millwork is crap and their selection sucks too. My pro store has a 52 page catalog of millwork profiles, and thats only what they _stock_. You can get even more special order. On top of all this their prices are often cheaper than HD on lumber, millwork and hardware.

      As far as I'm concerned the only reason to go to Lowes or HD is if you absolutely have to have something at night or on the weekend. The pro stores are only open pro hours - 6-5 M-F.

    57. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by It's+all+Krista's+Fa · · Score: 1

      I've run into situations where sufficiently late at night, the self-scans are the only checkouts open, being manned by the sole checkout monkey on duty. So, regardless of your number of groceries, you're herded through those horrific pieces of shit.

      --
      It's all Krista's Fault.
    58. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by jandrese · · Score: 1

      That may be true at yours, but my Home Depot raids special ed classes for their cashiers. I did a happy dance when I saw those self checkout lanes because it ment not waiting for the always slow cashiers in their real lines. I swear we have some that take 30 seconds to scan each item, and then another 15 seconds to figure out how to put it in the bag. It used to be that the lines were always halfway across the store too. The best part is, most people are intimidated by those self checkout machines, so there is almost never a line. I'm sure that will change after awhile, but I'm happy for the few months I'll have of nearly instant checkout.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    59. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what's to stop you from scanning just every other item, and walkign out with free stuff??

    60. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by zentinal · · Score: 5, Informative

      Stop & Shop here in New England has exactly that. You have to prove that you could successfully use the system, including having your purchases quickly double checked by a human, before you could use the system unsupervised.

      You scan as you shop. Checkout consists of placing your scanner into the holster. Relatively painless. I wish more stores had it. My local Hannaford's doesn't.

      I do agree, however, that shoppers should get a discount for using the system, because we're saving the store labor costs.
    61. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by geoffspear · · Score: 1
      At the grocery store I use, they have a bunch of those lanes, and for some reason they decided to replace a couple of them with "express" self-checkout lanes featuring the annoying bagging area that can't tell if you've bagged something right.

      Even if I have less than 12 items, I wait in line for the other lanes. It astounds me how they could be smart enough to install the only kind of self-checkout lane I've seen that actually works correctly most of the time, and then decide to switch some of those perfectly good lanes to the other, infinitely more annoying, type of self-checkout.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    62. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by It's+all+Krista's+Fa · · Score: 1

      The best is when you're scanning a hammer. That way, when the machine rejects it for some asinine reason, you get to demo the hammer.

      This also works for sufficiently large wrenches and ratchets.

      --
      It's all Krista's Fault.
    63. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      Try this: I was using a self-service checkout once, when a woman asked me if I could scan her items for her. I pointed out that then I'd have to pay for them, and she said "Oh, I'll give you the money."

      I told her to just do it herself after I had finished, but she wanted me to stay there and do it for her.

      Now, I'm a helpful person usually, but if I'm in the self-service "get the hell out quickly" queue, why would I want to help someone else clog up the queue when I could be gone?

      I should point out that there were about 10 other checkouts staffed by human cashiers open at the time. But then, of course, she would have had to queue. Much better to waste my time rather than hers if she has to queue or learn how to use the self-service checkouts.

    64. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by damiam · · Score: 1

      You know you can just type in the number under the bar code, right?

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    65. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by It's+all+Krista's+Fa · · Score: 1

      It works better when you use perishable items too, like ice cream, seafood (especially), or deli products.

      --
      It's all Krista's Fault.
    66. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by CreatureComfort · · Score: 3, Insightful


      You just got me all hot.

      --
      "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
      Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
    67. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by It's+all+Krista's+Fa · · Score: 1
      "It's not like they're forcing you to. It's there as a convenience to the shopper.

      All too often, they are. Numerous times I've seen all the human lanes closed and the sole person babysitting the automated lanes.

      --
      It's all Krista's Fault.
    68. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      I'd rather use a cashier for most purchases.

      - I'm usually tired from work and would rather have someone else take care of it.
      - Anything over a handful of items is handled much more quickly by most cashiers.
      - That damn little bagging shelf that you have to put your stuff on is too small and if you have anything round in a bag, like apples, they roll in the bag and off the shelf.
      - They fail too often and you have to wait for assistance anyway
      - You have to hunt through a menu for produce (I could type in "mangos" if they let me). My store doesn't give you the option of entering the code off of the fruit label.
      - If you pay in cash you have to feed each bill in vending machine style and deal with the usual "This bill has a folded corner, it is unacceptable!!"
      - I get the nagging feeling that I'm not being provided a convenience but being tricked into doing the store's work for them. I can't wait until they start having us go into the stockroom and move the pallets for them too.

      I bet right now there is a sales consultant telling a grocery exec "What you need to do is put ads or nag screens in the self-checkout lanes. Have them ask customers 'Would you like to buy a Snickers bar today? They're on sale!'." So then you'd lose the speed advantage of the self-checkout.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    69. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      Idiot? Hardly. If you need the washers, you gotta pay for them, and a debit card is often the easiest way to do so. Cash is so pre-21st century...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    70. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The computer wants to know which of eight types of onions I'm buying. Hell if I know, the round ones.

      Actually, the onions you bought are "the cheapest ones". Isn't choice grand?

    71. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by doughrama · · Score: 1

      I don't have any mod points... and I suppose I'm glad I don't since I'll be able to respond.

      I found your post to be one of the most insightfull I have ever read here on Slashdot. Thanks.

    72. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      9 times out of 10 a normal cashier is faster than the self-checkout. The only time I use the self-checkout is if every cashier has a queue of overflowing carts.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    73. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by cttforsale · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm an asshole. I go through self checkout with a full cart of groceries. Mostly chips and pop and hogies. I like to spend 30+ minutes at the checkout having the cute self checkout runner come help with every second item that has a problem. They're way more talkative and friendly as I have found regular cahsiers too focused on their task. Sometimes, I miss the impulse items too, so half way through my cart, I'll walk over to the regular checkouts and browse what they have for me to purchase. I also like striking up the random conversation with the people in line behind me. I met this one lady and I know she likes me. She had a nervous, almost angry complexion to her. Maybe I'll see her next time! We're destined to be! There's nothing self about self checkout!
      I now have a social life.
      Thankyou,
      Signed, Slashdot dork
      Parent's Basement

    74. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Garrett+Fox · · Score: 1

      My father and I, both smart people, had trouble figuring out how to use one of those machines. It took longer than a human cashier would have, first of all. Second, we had to pay with a $100 bill, which required having a human attendant run off and delay us while he got change. We took the food and the money and walked out... only to be stopped in the parking lot and asked if we planned to pay! The clerk had handed us $100 change for our $100 rather than, you know, deducting the price of the goods we'd scanned in, so that we were still expected to feed bills to the machine. Upshot: slow service plus extra hassle, all for the store's convenience. I have no intention of using these machines again. Nor do I plan to get a "frequent shopper card" and have the Giant/NSA complex or whoever analyzing my purchases.

      Oh -- I'm too young to know, but I'm told that when ATMs were introduced, banks said they were a money-saving measure. And then started charging fees to recoup the extra costs of those expensive machines. And then continued charging those fees. How long before you get to pay for the privilege of scanning and bagging your own groceries?

      --
      Revive the Constitution.
    75. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by bigdavesmith · · Score: 1

      Actually, this really bothers me too, but if you act ignorant and ignore it long enough, the cashier overrides all of the errors caused by moving things on the scale, and you can go about your business and just ignore it.

    76. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by nuggetman · · Score: 1

      Yea, I am building a vaction home on my spare time,

      I wish I had your spare time

      --
      ...and that's all there is to it.
    77. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Wanderer2 · · Score: 1
      And what's to stop you from scanning just every other item, and walkign out with free stuff??

      The systems I've seen in the UK request a "rescan" at random intervals. The first time you use the system, the cashier has to rescan all your items to check your scanned items match what's in your bags. This occurs every now and again. If your scans are accurate, the interval between rescans rises. If you keep "forgetting to scan" multiple items, you'll trigger rescans all the time. It won't stop all theft through the system but it generally keeps people honest.

      --
      I say we take-off and slashdot the site from orbit... it's the only way to be sure
    78. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by rk · · Score: 1

      I'm always the guy in line with one thing to buy, too... the one thing in the store that doesn't have its weight in the database and complains when I buy it.

      I hate self-checkout and avoid it if at all possible.

    79. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      This I can attest to. You put your item in the bag and it complains that you put something extra, so you take it out. Put it back in? It complains again. Do it too many times? "Please wait for cashier assitance.". Of course the monitor is always off somewhere else (either helping others with the same problem - there's 1 worker per 4 self-checkouts), or simply not around. The whole time I can see people breezing through the cashier lane.

      I've given up on the self-checkouts now. Of course the absolutely most fricking annoying god damned thing on the planet is when I'm sitting in line in the cashier lane. I may have 2 people in front of me; my wait won't be long. A cashier comes over and motions and says "Over here sir!". I figure I'll go to her register (it's save a little time) . . . . and I walk over and she points to an empty self-checkout. The next time it happens I'm going to beat her down with the loaf of bread I'm carrying.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    80. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by friedmud · · Score: 1

      Idiot?

      What do you suggest I use? Cash? Especially at self-checkouts this is _rediculously_ slow. Check!? NO WAY!

      Debit cards are _by far_ the fastest way to pay if you know what you're doing.

      Friedmud

    81. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by berzerke · · Score: 1

      Self-checkout should be _strictly_ reserved for people who have about 5 things _max_. When I see people with a cart full of groceries pull up to a self-checkout station I just laugh... it will take them _forever_...

      Or some stores, such as Kroger, where after a certain time, they ONLY have self-checkout available. I hate that, and it does limit my shopping there. I wonder if the study figured that out too.

    82. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by OakDragon · · Score: 2, Funny

      You think that's bad? The other day I bought some skin moisturizer. I scanned it, and the machine said "Now it puts the lotion in the basket."

    83. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Joe+U · · Score: 1

      If you are filling up the bagging area then.... YOU ARE TRYING TO BUY TOO MUCH STUFF USING SELF CHECKOUT!

      Then Home Depot should actually have over 3 registers open. I understand trying to save money, but having only 2 ~ 3 staffed registers causes a huge line that winds thru the front of the store.

      I don't want to wait on a line like that and I shouldn't have to. I'm a paying customer, how about some service for a change?

      Here's a tip: When you have 50+ people on line at checkout, open another register or 4.

    84. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

      No, no, no....you're supposed to spend that time in waiting in line checking out the babes....what's become of this nation????

    85. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by SophtwareSlump · · Score: 1
      If you have items in your basket that you know you will have difficulty with at the self-check line don't use the self-check line. It's not like they're forcing you to. It's there as a convenience to the shopper.

      Ha. At the grocery store by my house (Meijer), the pod of 4 self-checkout lanes has replaced the section of 'express lanes'. So let's say you have 6 items. Do you want to get in a normal human lane, behind 3 carts that appear to be buying enough food for a small country, or do you want to get in the self-checkout lane behind an older person who has a whole shopping basket full of produce AND has her checkbook out.

      Here's my 5 things about self-checkout lines that need fixed:
      • 10/12 item limit. Some of the stores (Giant Eagle, Wal-Mart) don't have a posted limit on items.
      • Fix the 'effing scales, or at least give us some slack on items weighing less than X ounces. If I'm going to steal something from a store, it's not going to be green onions or chives. If you're worried about small, expensive items, just make that item be confirmed by a cashier.
      • If you have 'pods' of self-checkout lanes, have one queue for each pod.
      • Have more than 2 'scales' to bag on. Even with 12 items, it's pretty easy to run out of room, and then get stuck in the 'PLEASE TAKE LAST ITEM OUT OF THE BAG' loop.
      • Let the cashier ban people from the self-checkout lanes. Or beat them.
    86. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      IT MAKES NO SENSE AT HOME DEPOT, OF ALL PLACES, SITTING THERE FOR 2 FULL MINUTES TELLING YOU TO PUT YOUR (FEATHER-WEIGHT OR GIGANTIC AND MASSIVE) ITEM IN THE BAG ON THE SENSOR, BEFORE LETTING YOU GET THE HELL OUT OF THERE.

      Somebody needs a nap...

      But I just love that Home Depot's self checkout scanner will let you scan a piece of lumber but then refuse to recognize it when you try to balance it on the weight sensor. If it's not meant to be used for such items, why does it scan them successfully?
    87. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by drsquare · · Score: 0, Troll
      I wouldn't try to do this in America. Any group action that tries to make any sort of societal change is likely to be labelled as terrorism.
      People who deliberately do things like in the grandparent post are just scum, maybe they deserve a trip to Guantanamo, it might teach them to act like civilised people.

      If you don't like self-service checkouts, simply don't use them, go to another shop. If I was a minimum wage worker at a supermarket and someone did that, I'd lay them out.
    88. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Mattintosh · · Score: 1

      You actually use the self-checkouts? Wow.

      I used to be a checkout clerk at a grocery store. My personal policy is: if I use self-checkout, there had better be a paycheck waiting for me at the other end of it. Since every store so far has refused to pay me for doing work for them at a self-checkout, I've refused to use the self-checkout in every store, despite long lines in regular lanes and empty lanes at the self-checkout.

      I work, you pay. No pay? No work. It's really quite simple. Even if they discounted the items I buy, I might use it, since that would be a payback of a sort. 10% sounds about right.

    89. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed with parent poster.

      Another thing that it's quite possible is that you can grab more than one (small) item and just make it so the machine scans only one. I beleive I made that "mistake" and it was more trouble for me to pull the other items out of the bag and rescan them.

    90. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Its worse than that; most people can't even seem to READ the directions right in front of them. They are totally baffeled, yet the answers right there in front of them. Its infuriating.

      The other side of it is that I don't see why I shouldn't get a discount for using the line; after all, I'm saving the store money by not having to pay an employee and the overhead of tracking them and their benefits.

    91. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      You'd be doing the store a favor if you shoplifted instead. They pay $.15 + 1.5% minimum, so those 25 cent washers give more to the cc processor than the store. It'd be nice if there were a better way to handle small transactions.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    92. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by plague3106 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Which makes you an asshat. You probably also write checks in the express line too.

    93. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      At least the store gets something, and their inventory is kept up to date. Shoplifting fails on both counts, there.

      Those kinds of purchases are "loss leaders" for a store like that. They know that those small sales don't make them money, but they get customers coming back to their store later when they need something bigger.

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    94. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      If you value your time at all, try to think of the discount being paid in time. If you save 5 minutes at $50/hour that's a $4.17 discount.

      I bring my own bags to avoid dumpstering them and they give me a nickel each. I'd do it for free, though. I prefer self-checkout actually, even if the line is longer. It usually moves faster (since there are 4 stations moving at half speed) and I don't have to interact with a cashier/bagger.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    95. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by imdx80 · · Score: 1

      the discussion was about 'self-checkout' not 'express line', there is a difference.
      Didn't realise shops take cheques still, how quaint

    96. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      That would be work. There was a restraunt I went to, and for some reason they card reader is NEVER able to read my card (I don't carry cash). Rather than try once or twice, I once waited 10 minutes this fat pig scanned the card over and over again. Finally she got it to work. Everyone else there just punched in the numbers after the first failure.

      The next time I had the misfortune of having her take my payment, I told her just to type in the number. She was pissed (it was harder!) but I got out of there quickly. Ugh.

    97. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Spaceman40 · · Score: 1

      Are you also the one who takes 25 items into the 9-items-or-less line?

      I hate those people. (finally, a chance to use emphasis tags)

      --
      I [may] disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.
    98. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Odd, late at night or early morning, usually all the self checkout lanes are closed, and you have to deal with the mongaloid clerk.

    99. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1


      Here's a better suggestion than your peaceful-resistance, flash-mob, media-celebrity fantasy: if you don't like the self-checkout lanes, use the full-service lanes instead.

    100. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Detritus · · Score: 1
      If you have items in your basket that you know you will have difficulty with at the self-check line don't use the self-check line. It's not like they're forcing you to. It's there as a convenience to the shopper.

      Not at my neighborhood grocery store. They often pull the clerks off their registers to restock shelves and do other work in the store. They are trying to force people to use the self-check lines by making the alternative scarce or nonexistent.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    101. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      You'd also be promptly arrested and fired for opening the store up to a lawsuit.

    102. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by myth24601 · · Score: 1

      Lets not forget that the cashiers do this hundreds of times a day. When somone hits the self check line, they may be doing it the first time ever. I predict that as more and more people use the self checkout more often they will get better at it.

      People finally got to where they can work the ATM machines pretty good so we may get to where self checkout will be a snap too.

      --
      No matter where you go, there you are.
    103. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      I won't use them because they're too sensitive, not because I'm stupid.

      I go to one, I open up a grocery bag to put things I'm buying in - "WOOT WOOT RED ALERT INVALID ITEM IN BAGGING AREA!" I now have to wait for the cashier supervising all the machines to clear me.

      I scan something, I lean over to put it in the bag, my purse falls off my shoulder - "WOOT WOOT RED ALERT INVALID ITEM IN BAGGING AREA!" I now have to wait for the cashier supervising all the machines to clear me.

      I scan something, and a person walks past me to get out of the store - "WOOT WOOT RED ALERT INVALID ITEM IN BAGGING AREA!" Again, I must wait for the cashier supervising all the machines to clear me.

      I have vegetables, they do not have a barcode. I look them up on the handy touch screen. Except, of course, there are 90 different variants of the vegetables I picked out. Did I get "organic greenbeans"? Did I get "certified organic greenbeans"? Did I get "greenbeans"? I don't remember - and, despite the fact that I *could* just pick whichever one is cheaper, I'm an honest person...

      Now, I suppose if I were to practice a sort of rigid discipline when checking out with my groceries - making sure my purse cannot possibly fall into the scanner, making sure I have several bags pre-placed, making sure to write down which of the umpteen variants of each bit of produce I picked I'm buying, snarling "GET BACK!" at anyone who tries to walk behind me to leave the store - well, at that point, maybe it would be a quick operation. But I'm just not willing to learn "grocery fu" and will just go to the checkout lanes with an actual person there because even with the 90 year-old woman in front of me insisting that her hemmorhoid cream coupon should be good for half-and-half cream, it's still going to be less hassle.

      At any place other than my local supermarkets (I've tried several, just to see if the self-checkout is always borked, and it is, universally, at food stores), I've been able to use the self-checkout without problem.

      Just saying - it isn't always user stupidity.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    104. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

      What freeways are you driving? I want to stay away from them. Please tell me it isn't the 101 or the 118!

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    105. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last 2 times I went to Home Depot, there was only 1(one) manned checkout option ( the line was 6 or 7 deep ).
        The 4 self-serve options were all being used, and the poor Clerk for them couldn't keep up with the customer requests for unscanable/wieght problems.

      I waited in the manned spot b/c I had 4 bags of soil and 2 bags of bird seed ammong other things, and knew I'd have to bother someone anyway.

      It was a good 15-20 min wait ( very aggrivating )

    106. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by cluke · · Score: 1

      This is just fantastically insightful. Hats off to you, sir.

    107. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by pcgc1xn · · Score: 1

      The biggest problem I have with them is beer. One of the major food groups (it counts as a grain product). In AZ we were lucky enough to be able to buy beer at the supermarket. First time I see the self checkouts at the supermarket, I think 'how hard can it be?, there is no queue, it should be faster!'
      Scan item 1 - frozen pizza, check
      Scan item 2 - 12 pack of beer, check
      Scan item 3 - 12 pack of beer, check - hey this is pretty easy.
      'Press here to finish', click
      'Please wait for an assistant'... ...waiting... no one around ...waiting... Wonder why I am waiting ...waiting... still no one around ...waiting...
      figure out that I am waiting for a 16 year old kid to check my ID to see if I am old enough to buy beer.
      Decide that it was not worth the effort, leave it all and go to another store.

      When someone gets pissed off enough to leave their beer behind because your system doesn't work, there is a problem with it.

      Nope, I have never used the self checkouts at the grocery again. Home Depot ones get used occasionally, and depending on what I have.

    108. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Bluesman · · Score: 1

      Eh, even given the loss 50 IQ points, most people would still be way ahead of your average Home Depot cashier.

      I had one pull out a calculator to figure out how many feet my 6 pieces of 8 foot long molding came out to, and she came up with 0.

      Another time, I cut pieces of 16 foot molding about in half, and the cashier insisted that she had to measure each one. "No, it's really four 16 foot pieces, cut in half." I waited for ten minutes while she took each one to the meauring tape, coming back to the register with measurements like 7.95 feet, 8.10 feet, typed in each one, and then stared at me blankly when I handed her extra money so that I'd get a five insted of four ones back.

      I swear, if these people aren't paying Home Depot for the priviledge of working there, Home Depot is getting ripped off.

      --
      If moderation could change anything, it would be illegal.
    109. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by nolife · · Score: 1

      I agree, if more then one person is in line I will go to a regular cashier. Some things I've noticed as a frequent user of self checkout at my local Wal-Mart. The scanner at the self-checkout must have some type of delay built in, either that or you have to bag and wait for the weight calculation before you can scan other items. This is a pain if you have many of the same thing and they are light. You will notice a real cashier flying through items. You can NOT do that in self checkout. I specifically recall one item that offered 33% more free but must have had the same UPC as the regular size. It would not be accepted by the bag sensor and I had to wait for a cashier. I had five of them and she had to approve every one of them individually.

      I tried the self checkout at Home Depot once. I only had a few items all had bar codes. I gave up and have not used it there since. Maybe my bad experience with them was isolated.

      I do not consider myself one of the idiots you talk about because 90% of the time I can fly through the line but I feel the self checkout is not quite as good as it could. I guess the stores have to balance convenience and security so the limitations I notice are more then likely by design.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    110. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      At least the store gets something, and their inventory is kept up to date. Shoplifting fails on both counts, there.
      Actually, the processing costs them more than they get, and internal shrinkage and spoilage generally already have the inventory buggered way beyond what a little shoplifting could do. No, it's sad but true, stealing a 25 cent pack of washers would actually be better for them financially.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    111. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by el_gordo101 · · Score: 1

      This is the correct answer. Please, no more replies.

      --
      TODO: Insert witty sig
    112. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by nolife · · Score: 1

      I did not think ATM/Debit cards or transactions with a pin added a cost to the store. I thought only credit cards had the fee based on the log (Visa, MC, AMEX etc..).

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    113. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      The sheer number of bulky items like lumber lawnmowers, appliances, non-tagged items like some lumbers, screws, bolts, nuts, magnetically alarmed items which exist in stores like Home Depot and Lowes make self-checkout a loss-leader. I rarely use self-checkouts even in a grocery store, and never if I have to weigh something, remember to grab an item code sticker or any of the other nonsense. Also, it never fails that I have to sit and hold up traffic while I wait from someone to come and override the price because an item was advertised as on sale for 0.75X and shows up in the sysetm at X. Also, I don't know the proper authorization code to get my 10% contracter discount at Lowes.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    114. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Kroger, where after a certain time, they ONLY have self-checkout available. I hate that, and it does limit my shopping there.

      5 years ago I realized there was no good reason for me to ever buy anything else at Wal-Mart due to their business practices, labor practices, etc.

      But I'm hard pressed to find a single thing that Kroger is any less evil about than Wal-Mart, when it comes to Walmart's grocery-sections-in-a-store.

      Starting pay at Kroger for my kids, would be less than any grocery chain job 30 years ago where I grew up working after school 20 hours a week.

      Two years of part time for a grocery store chain was enough to save up for four years of tuition at any public university in the state.

      And just NOW these chains are complaining about "high" labor costs that are 15 cents an hour above a minimum wage set ten years ago?

    115. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by LunaticTippy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Who do you think pays for processing? Surely not your bank! Do a web search for "debit card processing fee rate" or something and you'll find a vast array of bad deals aimed at small businesses. Debit cards are generally cheaper than credit cards, but you'll always pay a per-transaction and a percentage. Big chain stores negotiate down to a floor around $.15+1.5% and for smaller stores you can easily double that.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    116. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Scottl_h · · Score: 1

      I regularly use self-checkout lanes at both the grocery store and Home Depot. I think the technology doesn't lend itself very well in the Home Depot model. There are too many items that need cashier intervention. One Saturday evening, I went to my local Home Depot and the only registers open were the self checkout. If I recall, one of the four stations was out of order (typical), and the other three were busy with several people in the queue for the next available station. Just about everyone had lumber, pipe, or something else that required a cashier to input or confirm. I thought I'd never get out of there alive, it took so long. Standing there observing other people, it makes you wonder how they deal with ATM machines, microwave ovens, VCR/DVD players, etc., on a daily basis. It's not a complicated process, yet they make it so difficult. This is not a new concept anymore, I recall seeing the first of these self-checkout stations 7 or 8 years ago in my area. How long does it take to get over the learning curve?

      --
      Excessive drinking is fine...in moderation.
    117. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Yes, I know exactly what the discussion is about. What I'm saying is that the same kind of asshole that does that in a self-checkout line ALSO writes checks in the express line.

      Yes, many places still take checks, but I can't for the life of me figure out why. Of course I live in a state in the US where the big news story one night was how the govener was taking part in a cow milking contest...

    118. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by DrLlama · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is one of the reasons I refuse to make use of the self-checkout aisles, and further refuse to do business with stores that are overloading the self-checkout.

      The last time I went into my local Home Depot I had a similar experience, with a sligth twist. I had a handful of items and might have made effective use of self-checkout. The line for the self-checkout was over a dozen people long, as was the line at the one open cashier. When this sort of occurence happens I loudly comment that Lowe's seems to be much more concerned about customers and leave the store to make my purchase elsewhere.

      On occasion I have taken the time to let the store manager know that I find the situation unacceptable and that his store is losing business as a result. In a WalMart world, this probably won't make a lot of difference, but I refuse to waste my time because the store couldn't be bothered to have sufficient staffing.

      --
      Who, me?
    119. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by The-Bus · · Score: 1

      When I worked at a supermarket years ago, putting back items was probably the easiest and best of all the menial jobs I could do. You get to see stuff besides the other cashier's back and you can walk around without having to push a bunch of carts around in the heat/hail/rain/snow. With a full enough cart, you can spend a good 30-45 minutes walking around the store, minding your own business as you keep working.

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    120. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once upon a time in college, my roommate and I went grocery shopping at 2am. For some reason, the store thought that it'd be a good idea to close all of the regular checkout lanes and only have the self-checkout lane open. We had a full cart of groceries, so they had to reset the scales not once, but twice, because we had so many items.

    121. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by rsadelle · · Score: 1
      I'm not a professional grocery clerk
      Me either, and my one experience with self-checkout made me truly appreciate those who are.
    122. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      A store with only self-checkout?
      That would be "my" grocery store. I used to like to shop late at night, but lately when I shop at 2 am or so, there is only one checker on duty and they have her supervising the self-check lanes. If you have a full cart, too bad, you have to check everything yourself. And you can bet it messes the machine up because you have nowhere to put the bags.

      My theory is that it isn't store policy to make it self-check only, but the efforts of the employees on duty to discourage customers in the middle of the night (the store is open 24 hours).

    123. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Eddy_D · · Score: 1
      The problem is that mouth-breathers dimly grasp this truth...

      That kind of demeaning language is simply not appropriate... the correct term is "slack-jawed yokel".

      --
      - I stole your sig.
    124. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by kabocox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think it's fine for it's intended purpose, but trained, competent, (dare I say union) checkers are far more efficient and I'm hoping that will deter grocery chains from deploying too many of these self-checkout lanes. A store with only self-checkout? Well, that'd be a store with a lot of fistfights.

      Wait until Wal-Mart does RFID right. There won't be any checker because you just push the entire cart straight through an RFID reader and swipe your ATM card through it. That's what people what to use self-check out for not for some stupid 10 or less items. We want to use it for a cart load of stuff at a time.

    125. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by rvw14 · · Score: 1

      This is actually quite commom. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Highway_hypnosis

    126. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by kamikasee · · Score: 1

      I see a lot of negative comments about these self check systems, but I have come to enjoy them. Up here in PA, we have a grocery chain called Giant Eagle, and their systems are by far the best that I have ever used. In addition to the self-check stands with the small bagging areas, they have full-size self check stands with a conveyor belt. The only trouble I've ever had was when I tried to ring up a soda that I had already begun drinking (thus changing the weight), I shop there twice a week and always use the self check lanes if I can.

      I prefer self check because then I don't have a surley cashier *throwing* my produce into bags, putting raw meat in with vegetables, setting cans on my bread and chips, etc.

      If you're by yourself, it can be a little slow with lots of groceries because you have to bag everything after you've scanned it all. The baggers will usually come bag for you if they see that you're alone. In contrast to the cashiers, they usually know how to bag properly, and they don't abuse your stuff as much because they don't have to keep up their scan times (this is how cashier's performance is generally "graded").

      When I first found the self-check lanes (at Walmart, 3-4 years ago), they were very buggy as many people describe in the comments. But lately I have used Walmart, Home Depot, Lowes, Giant Eagle, and even Ikea, and found them all to be satisfactory. I think a lot of this is people who had a bad experience a long time ago and now refuse to give self check another chance, even though the technology has improved.

    127. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by bdcrazy · · Score: 1

      A few summers ago i worked at a utility concrete plant that was over an hour drive from my house.
      A couple times near the end of the summer i would "wake up" a few blocks from the plant going, how did i get here? It was scary.

      --
      Tonights forecast: Dark. Continued dark throughout most of the evening, with some widely-scattered light towards morning
    128. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      In retail environments, the VAST majority of "inventory shrinkage" is shoplifting, and the last I recall, washers don't spoil. If the washers are $0.25, and they are charged $0.15 + 1.5% for the debit as an earlier post states, then they are indeed clearing a hair less than $0.10.

      Besides keeping the inventory properly up-to-date, the debit transaction also records the sale, which helps the retailer with their demand statistics. The point about shoplifting being preferable makes for a funny line, but it just doesn't hold up.

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    129. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Monster_Juice · · Score: 1

      The only thing you are going to accomplish is pissing off a cahier or two. Do you really think they report to the CEO everyone that complained about the self-checkout? I personally see where these machine benefit the customer from faster checkout and the business by providing something that never calls in sick, does not want a raise, takes no breaks and does not quit when they find a job offering 25 cents an hour more. Let's face it most people do not want to work at a cash register. Have you ever heard a kid say "When I grow up I want to work at the Walmart as a cashier"? It is a job people do not want and companies have a hard time filling those positions because of that.

      I bet if you try this often enough a cahier is going to start recognizing you and running their own silent protest on your VW bus tires.

      --
      Slashdot +1 funny -4 Insightful +1 informative -2 Redundant
      Karma: Somewhere between SCO and Microsoft
    130. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by naoursla · · Score: 1

      I do this, but not as a form of protest. If I experience difficulty in the self-checkout lane I do the following in order:
      1. Wait around 20 seconds for the cashier to help me. If the problem is cleared then exit error handling.
      2. If there is another self checkout kiosk available then move all of my items, exit error handling and begin the checkout process again. This process repeats until I have either checked out or all of the kiosks are locked.
      3. Estimate the time to go through the cashier line and weigh that against how much I want my potential purchases right now. If the time is short enough then move to the cashier, otherwise leave all of my good where they are and exit the store.

      I do not feel guilty at all about doing this. Self-checkout is used to save money. I find cost savings unacceptable if they simply transfer the cost to me in the form of inconvenience and time. My response to this is to cause these "cost saving measures" to fail so that the store improves them or removes them. I am recreating the jobs the machines inefficiently try to replace and creating an economic incentive to improve the machines. The stores have already made improvements. It used to be that the machines were unmanned. Now they have a single employee staffing a set of four machines. I find myself exiting in step one more often now than I used to, and I am fine with that.

      If you really want to protest the machines on some sort of ethical level, then pay for all of your purchases in pennies. The change repository will be more expensive to empty and the machine doesn't care (unlike a human cashier). And it is completely legal since pennies are legal tender. I don't think it is against the law to be annoying quite yet.

    131. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I'm not a moron I love the self checkouts. In and out in a few seconds flat. An extra lane would be just as backed up.

      Let people that don't want to learn the self checkouts suffer, and let the rest of us get on with our lives. Just because you don't like em doesn't mean they should go away.

    132. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Scoth · · Score: 1

      Both the Wal Mart and the Kroger near me have signs, I think the Wal Mart's is 15 items and the Kroger 10. Much like the X item express lanes, however, I've never actually seen it enforced and I've seen plenty of people doing whole cartloads themselves. I don't recall one at Home Depot and... some other grocery store I was recently.

      Incidentally, Kroger's is great. Minimal delays in the "Please place the item in the bag" portion and rarely gets stuck anywhere. Wal Mart's is usually a huge pain, though they've revamped it lately so it's not so bad. I still avoid them when I can though, or if there's much of a line. Not worth the trouble. I haven't used Home Depot's much since I'm usually the guy with six individual washers with matching nuts and bolts and I don't really feel like messing with those in the self checkout (if you even can?).

      As for the last comment, I don't know that union enters into it. Dunno if it's still the case but Publix used to get slammed all the time for hiring non-union and I've tended to have pleasant shopping experiences there. I think the whole need for self-checkout is due to stores' poor planning and training of checkers as often don't have enough lanes open and/or the ones that are open are manned by slowpokes.

      And, I'll agree with the previous posts: It's extremely frustrating when you're waiting on some idiot who can't figure the system out. I'll usually give people the benefit of the doubt when it comes to slightly technical things, but when there's all of 4 or 5 buttons, the big one being "DEBIT" and they still have to ask the helper-person how to use their debit card it just frustrates me.

    133. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by jafac · · Score: 1

      No shit.

      How the hell am I supposed to put an 8' copper pipe into a 8" plastic bag?

      Somebody wasn't thinking - and/or, somebody scammed somebody into buying these machines, so they could get their bonus and skedaddle.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    134. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by entmike · · Score: 1

      Maybe the cashier was on break and attempting to be helpful.

      Or maybe that cashier was actually a supervisor or a manager.

      Either way, I doubt they give a shit one way or another what you think or how much you spend or what lane you use when you ask such a smartass unoriginal question.

    135. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

      The stores in my area have "express" self-service registers for people with just a few items. The other option is some places will let you check out from the Customer Service booth up front if you only have one or two items.

      I've found that the express lines are just as slow as the regular self-service lines. I regularly go through the "normal" self service lane with a dozen or more items, and I'm normally done about the same time as the guys with four or five items. That's even if I have fruit/veggies in the cart. The biggest problem I've found is the scanners are not kept clean, so they do not reliably read the UPC. But I've noticed there is normally an aux scanner perpendicular to the one built into the table, so I use that one for most items instead.

      The other problem, of course, is the scales on the bagging table as GP said. Even if you have one item, it still makes you put it on the scale. And good luck if it's something like marshmallows! That almost never registers. WTF is the point of the scales? I mean, the only thing it's good for is to keep people from putting it back in their cart and inadvertantly scanning the item again. It does nothing to prevent any kind of fraud.

    136. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by merigold77 · · Score: 1

      I shop late at night at the 24 hour Kroger near me every couple of weeks, buying a whole cart full of items ($120-150). At that time, typically only the self-serve lines are open, 4-6 of them staffed by one cashier. However, rather than deal with half an hour of checking myself out and listening to "please put the item in the bag. Please take the item out of the bag and scan it. Please put the item in the bag," the cashier will almost always open a regular checkout for me and check me out that way. All I do is ask politely.

      --
      Writing is the only socially acceptable form of schizophrenia. (E. L. Doctorow)
    137. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Didn't realise shops take cheques still, how quaint..."

      Sure...actually, most places take checks. Where do you live where they don't take checks anymore?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    138. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by jahudabudy · · Score: 1

      I know what you mean about mod points; its the curse of responsibility. And I would rather have one personalized compliment than 5 anonymous mod points any day. With two compliments, I'm not sure my hat will fit when I leave work today ;-)

      --
      ...sometimes, in order to hurt someone very badly, you have to tell that person terrible lies. - PA
    139. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "It's extremely frustrating when you're waiting on some idiot who can't figure the system out"

      I'm afraid this problem will never go away tho....I mean, look how long we've had ATM's, and you still see people with that deer in the headlights look after they place their card in the slot...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    140. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      That seems unrelated to self-checkout and related to understaffing. There were two people working checkout for a large store during a rush. That's when you pull a couple people off the floor to empty the queues. Self-check lines are great for the person with an item or two. They are not yet intended for the sole means of leaving the store, and a manager staffing based off that assumption is incompetent. It is not a failure of the self-checkout lines.

    141. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by WedgeTalon · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but I can move an entire cartload through the self checkout quicker than it takes the typical WalMart shopper to checkout with 5 items. I have no remorse over this. If I see you come up behind me with a single item and you look vaguely competent (such as, no drool, no blank look in eyes, etc), then I'll let you go first (heck, I do that in regular lanes too). Otherwise, I'll inconvenience you no less really than the average joe in the self checkout.

    142. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by nuzak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > There won't be any checker because you just push the entire cart straight through an RFID reader and swipe your ATM card through it.

      Then the parking lot robot will help you load it into your flying car.

      Seriously, they will never allow batch checkouts like that because it's simply too easy to take the tags off some items and pass it through in a full cart. People also want bags (you can't take the cart home), and unless you shop at Costco, someone else is going to do it. So what'll happen probably is that you'll get a bagger that bags stuff coming off a conveyer belt that you put your items on (and thus pass through a scanner), and that they'll probably have to manually intervene every dozen items or so. My bold prediction is it won't get any more advanced than that for at least 20 years.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    143. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      What I'm saying is that the same kind of asshole that does that in a self-checkout line ALSO writes checks in the express line.

      And why? My grocery store has on set of 4 "15 items or less" self-checkout. It also has one next to it that is self-checkout with no stated limits. So, are the people with full carts in the limitless self-checkout wrong? The express lines often say "cash only" so to pay with a check is annoying and a violation of stated guidelines. But not so with many (most?) self-checkout lines.

      On another note, I don't know why "cash only" is stated. I haven't worked retail in a while, but aren't credit cards as fast as cash, except at places like CompUSA (I pick them because they are a popular one that takes impressions of the card, and other annoying and delaying steps)? Not debit, or transactions with cash back, but to just swipe while the checker is scanning, sign when he is done, and go. No change, no sorting bills. But yet the express lanes still mostly have "cash only" signs.

    144. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1

      My original impression of "self-checkout" was similar to this. However, it has since become pretty obvious to me that it is costing these stores (at least the groceries) more money than it is saving them, and not even including the lack of impulse-buy as mentioned in the OP. They still need staff to monitor the systems and the customers, the systems cost more money and there is the additional expense of training and maintenance. Some clueless exec got the "bright" idea these things could bust the unions and save some checker payroll $$$, but it sure looks to me that they've been paying and paying for this and it has not been a net win.

      It's true that many people can't figure them out and end up getting them locked up-- so they need constant assistance. Also, with too little supervision, sleight-of-hand pilfering could make it past the cameras so you gotta pay at least one person to baby sit them at all times.

      Consequently, the few times I'm in such stores, rather than boycott them I actually make a point to use them, as I figure the longer these stores think people are using them and this thing might actually save them some money, the worse it will ultimately be for them. I figure the greatest act of protest against these things is really, to utilize them and thereby prolong the store's agony. If everyone boycotted them from the get go they'd take them out immediately and not waste any more money on them-- why should they get off so easy after having come up with such a collosally bad idea, and actually implemented it?

    145. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by MrZaius · · Score: 1

      The Evansville Lowes have self checkout. Personally, most of the stuff I buy at hardware stores (florescent light bulbs, hooks, nails, drill bits, etc.) are all easy to run through the self checkout. Beats the hell out waiting in line. However, they also have competent management that adequately staff their regular registers.

      The latter's all that matters.

    146. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
      My local Kroger has two self-check-out areas - one that is labelled 15 Items Or Less, and one for cartfuls of groceries. The non-Express one even has rotating bag holders to make sure you can easily bag everything - they hold up to 8 bags of groceries at a time without having to take anything off. These were clearly made for people to use with regular-sized grocery orders, not one or two items.

      I use them regularly with about $40-50 worth of groceries. It takes me about the same time as going through the regular checkout, because I'm not incompetent and can work the machine. The only time I ever get slowed down is when I have a vegetable that's not listed and doesn't have a number on it, in which case I tell the cashier what it is, they put it in for me, and the whole ordeal adds ten seconds to my checkout time.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    147. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by plover · · Score: 1
      Why not just RFID everything and just let us walk out?
      Despite the IBM commercials, RFID isn't ready for prime-time yet. They're still having issues with agressive readers reading the next customer in line's merchandise. They can't read through certain metals or liquids. And CASPIAN is still all over their big brotherish butts. Not that they're very relevant to the industry, but they've got Consumer Reports telling their subscriber base that "RFID is teh debbil!"

      That, and the tags are still too pricey for items that cost under a dollar.

      --
      John
    148. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      That sounds really cool. Out of curiosity, is it easy to void out items if you change your mind? Often, when I get to the end of a shopping trip and I think I've maybe bought a few too many things that weren't on my original list I'll go through my cart and do a "sanity check" and put back one or two treats that I don't really need...

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    149. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

      I've seen a number of restaurants and gas stations both here and up in (Minneapolis where I used to live) that no longer accept checks, but both cash and credit cards are okay. I suspect it's the result of a lot of check fraud.

      --
      Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
      The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
    150. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

      One night at Kroger (fairly late at night) my wife and I were surprised to find that there was only one checkout person in the building and they were monitoring the self-checkout lanes. There were no manual check-out lanes open and running at all, and we were told we had to check out our cart full of groceries using the self-checkout.

      We haven't been back to that Kroger for a while. My wife was kinda pissed off having to run $120 worth of groceries through the rather tedious machine...

      --
      Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
      The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
    151. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
      I'm the one who presses the Spanish language button by mistake instead of the English.

      To help with learning Spanish, my husband has been purposely using the Spanish version on self checkouts (and ATMs etc) for the past year or so. Apparently this makes him very strange, because at one grocery store in particular every time he chose Spanish an employee would come over to fix it for him. This seemed to be standard practice - picking Spanish made some light go off over at the Customer Service desk so they could come change it to English. Self checkout always took longer at that store, since we had to go through the "No, really, I want it in Spanish" dance with them every time.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    152. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      And why? My grocery store has on set of 4 "15 items or less" self-checkout. It also has one next to it that is self-checkout with no stated limits. So, are the people with full carts in the limitless self-checkout wrong?

      I might be wrong, but most places that have Express lines DON'T have the self-checkout lines. The express lines are still manned by a normal cashier. (This is how it is where I live, anyway). So I my grip is related (because having a cart full in a self checkout line is as bad as writing a check in a standard checkout line, marked Experss (which always limit the number of items).

      On another note, I don't know why "cash only" is stated. I haven't worked retail in a while, but aren't credit cards as fast as cash, except at places like CompUSA (I pick them because they are a popular one that takes impressions of the card, and other annoying and delaying steps)? Not debit, or transactions with cash back, but to just swipe while the checker is scanning, sign when he is done, and go. No change, no sorting bills. But yet the express lanes still mostly have "cash only" signs.

      Usually these are bigger stores; they have cash only express and standard express. The fact is that cash is THE fastest way, although with stores keeping faster connections to the Visa network, things are getting close. But when I worked as a cashier at a fairly large store (enough to justify 24 checkouts total) the cards WOULD slow up the cash only line if someone tried to use them. I could count the money and give change faster than the Visa could process.

    153. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by evilviper · · Score: 1

      You shouldn't feel too concerned about it, unless you're doing lots of driving at night. It's not that you were a zombie the whole time, it's just that your brain didn't have significant stimulation, and it basically wiped the memory of that period of time. It's a very weird phenomena to be sure, but not as serious as it seems at first.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    154. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      What freeways are you driving? I want to stay away from them. Please tell me it isn't the 101 or the 118!

      Nope. You're safe :-)
      I was southbound on the 5, then found myself heading east on the 10.

    155. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by plover · · Score: 1
      I'm not a professional grocery clerk, so don't bitch about my speed.
      And I'm not talking about self-checkout at grocery stores, but specifically the ones at the Home Depot. Onions aren't in their item database. Everything they sell (apart from custom cut products such as wire) gets a barcode, and those custom products get a tag that I've never tried to take through self-checkout. AFAIK they don't even have a place to enter an item number manually -- if it's not a simple scan, it goes through the attendant cashier.

      Besides, this is America. I'll bitch about everyone and anyone, whenever I want and wherever I want. :-)

      --
      John
    156. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      I was more amazed than concerned. I've had it happen other times, but never with such a large gap, and never with making an unplanned turn! (To be fair, it was an exit that I had frequently taken, and my "autopilot" seems to have simply preferred that route, though I had intended to continue on the original freeway.)

    157. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by kackle · · Score: 1

      I concur. I am an embedded software engineer by trade and my first job as a teen was with a large grocery chain where I worked as a cashier for 2-3 years. And yet, *most* of the times I've tried the self-checkouts, a human being had to be called in to "debug" an unexpected situation or the overall poor self-checkout design (price doesn't match shelf's pricing, it won't allow one to buy a gift card, multiple scale mechansim is hopelessly lost). The overall design of these things and their interfaces are terrible...

      And, to top it off, I am insulted that they are making me do their work (as well as the fast food places that hand you an empty cup)! I now go out of my way to avoid stores that have such alleged "cost-saving" mechanisms.

    158. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by saltydogdesign · · Score: 1

      Point of fact: self-checkout systems are some of the worst designed user interfaces on earth. I'm 36, a software developer, and a gadget freak. It's fair to say that I'm very familiar with UI concepts of many sorts. But these things can throw me for a loop. They look like they were designed by Dr. Frankenstein -- bill changer from this machine, card reader from that. What a mess. You put your cash in one place and your change comes out somewhere eight feet away, while your receipt comes out somewhere else. And the worst bit is that you can't take anything off the bagging counter without making the machine go into hysterics.

      I once got $40 cash back from a debit card purchase. My cash came out so far from where the actual business was going on that I forgot all about it until twenty minutes later. Butterfly ballots indeed. This is far worse.

      --
      // This is not a sig.
    159. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Any group action that tries to make any sort of societal change is likely to be labelled as terrorism.

      My tinfoil-hat is off to you, sir. I'm not REMOTELY paranoid enough to even IMAGINE that someone might believe that complaining about a store would get you the testicle-shock treatment.

      I plan to move into a tiny shack in the middle of nowhere, in hopes I can one day attain this level of insane paranoia...

      I never understood why people in America feel they have to make someone else's life shittier just to express some point. How about you write a letter, and you get all your friends to write letters, talking about how displeased you are with the service you received.

      Companies care about $$$, and NOTHING ELSE. If you write a letter, they'll give you the brush-off form response. If you make a big scene, make more work for employees, and yes, make their jobs more miserable, you'll single-handedly cost the company SIGNIFICANT ammounts of money. One strategy is effective, the other is not.

      Of course, I suppose with your level of paranoia, you would believe that the civil rights movement was successful because of the letter-writing campaign, and not the boycotts, sit-ins, protests, and other things which MAKE SOMEONE ELSE'S LIFE SHITTIER JUST TO EXPRESS SOME POINT.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    160. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by saltydogdesign · · Score: 1

      That's the truth. If these places want me to check out my own purchases, they damn well better cut me a paycheck while they're at it.

      --
      // This is not a sig.
    161. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

      BTW, Pete, I figured you got that I was kidding.... But since some people here are humor impaired...

      I've had the same experience myself.

      Now if only it would cool off... 119F for those of us in Woodland Hills is too much.

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    162. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Right on! If you're going to compare to the regular cashiers, have them try to use thos damn self-checkout systems. I've used them perhaps four times total, and I always hate it every time. It's not so much a limitation of technology, rather their target audience. Maybe they have a secret "expert user" mode that lets me scan items as quickly as I can and not require me to place each one individually on the damn scale.

    163. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Miguelito · · Score: 1
      If you are filling up the bagging area then.... YOU ARE TRYING TO BUY TOO MUCH STUFF USING SELF CHECKOUT!


      I bought 2 items at Home Depot using the self-checkout this weekend.. and they overfilled the bagging area. I bought 2 sets of faux-wood blinds. Large and heavy, but 2 simple items. Computer would bitch about not having the things in the bagging area for a sec then realize they were there and move on.

      I personally love using the self-check over the cashiers and always do when I can (Home Depot, Ralphs, Albertsons, etc).. As long as I don't have to wait for anyone, the self-check is ALWAYS faster for me. Of course, I'm not one of those that loses IQ when using the system. Yes, I can operate the self-check at a fast pace, and I don't take more then 20 seconds to get cash from an ATM unlike some people.

      Oh, a couple weeks ago I also had 6 items at Home Depot and they didn't fit in the bagging area.. I bought 6 replacement cushions for my patio chairs. Goes without saying that I bought my items and was done (both times) before the rest of the pople using the self-checkout systems, and they were only buying a couple things as well.

      A tad OT but...
      I still think the grocery clerk strike that happened a couple years ago was the dumbest thing they could've done to themselves. Here's a job where the actual skill required of workers has basically gone down in the last few decades (anyone remember when they had to type in all the sku numbers vs just swipe across a scanner?).. yet they still want more and more money. I don't know about everyone else here, but I regularly have to learn new things and become more and more efficient at my job to stay valuable and to get promotions/raises, but not cashiers. That strike only made me want to hurry up the adoption of more and more self-service systems to take them out of the loop alltogether.
      --
      - My favorite error message: xscreensaver, running on an old Sparc 5 w/ 8bit color: bsod: Couldn't allocate color Blue
    164. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by geek2718 · · Score: 1

      Amen brother. It's exactly like people who argue against carpool/HOV lanes, claiming that they are under-utilized. Actually sit and count, don't complain that they "look empty." Anecdotes are for dopes-give me statistics. Of course they look empty, that's the whole point. Few people are going to use a [self-checkout/carpool] lane if it the line is the same length as a regular lane.

    165. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Zerbs · · Score: 1

      The experience really varies from store chain to store chain. While I haven't used it at Home Depot, I've regularly used it at Giant Eagle grocery stores with rarely a problem. On the other hand, I tried to use self checkout at a Topps grocery store, the process felt awkward and didn't flow the way you'd expect, and the instructions were so confusing it seemed to be telling me the exact opposite of what it really wanted me to do. Fortunately all the Topps stores are shutting down so won't have to worry about that any longer.

      --
      "22 astronauts were born in Ohio. What is it about your state that makes people want to flee the Earth?" Stephen Colbert
    166. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by adpowers · · Score: 1

      Amen. I've used a self checkout thing only once, a few years ago. I was buying lots of items at a Home Depot and decided to try one of those things (they weren't busy, but I thought it'd be interesting). It kept locking up and tell us to put items in the bag. I haven't used a self checkout stand since.

      And if they want us to use self checkout only when we have a few items, they should post a fucking sign.

    167. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by BK425 · · Score: 1

      That's funny "you are trying to buy to much stuff" seems to be a common complaint from businesses.
      Obviously when I show up and they can't even pay a human being wages to take my credit card and ask me if I found everything, I am "trying to buy to much stuff". When (not to NAME home depotor anything...) I have to chase down an employee on the other side of the 70,00 square foot warehouse (with 80,000 units of an item I don't need and no 90 degree copper elbows) so they can radio for someone to find plumbing and point me to the putty, then I am "trying to buy to much stuff".
      It's understandable and maybe even endearing to tune into a tech harbor like /. and find people trying to solve problems with self checkout systems but ulimately there are problems that are simply not technological in nature. bk425

    168. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no point in arguing with people who are too stupid and/or lazy to scan their own items. Granted, you should only use the self checkout if you also fit the limits for the express lane, but any idiot can hit the friggin button that says "Next". It's not hard.

    169. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      BTW, Pete, I figured you got that I was kidding....

      Yeah. The feeling of realization was pretty much the same as waking up and forgetting you're in a hotel room instead of at home. That's always a little weird. One time I forgot what country I was in :-)

      "Oh yeah, I'm in Nicaragua..."

      Nice sig, by the way.

    170. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I could count the money and give change faster than the Visa could process.

      I've never heard of that in a large chain store. As a side deal, I set up merchants with GPRS processors to an IP based service. The time from swipe to an authorization code was under 5 seconds. And this was in the middle of nowhere, as long as they had a cell signal. Those on hard-wired IP I rarely saw authorizations times above a second. I don't care if you can make change instantaniously, you either have to count it out to the customer or they'll flip through to make sure it looks right, neither of which is as fast as the processing (and that's only one pard of the cash transaction). I certainly can't even walk to the gas station attendant in the time it takes to finish my pay-at-the-pump transaction, let alone pay with cash inside. Every time I've seen a credit card transaction, other than those that are modem based, it has been vastly faster than any cash transaction could be (well, as another exception, I must bring up CompUSA again, as they swipe and imprint the card). And the number that are modem based are dwindling fast.

    171. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      It's there as a convenience to the shopper

      Bullshit, it's there so the greedy God damned owners can hire fewer people.

      "Cowboy?" Since when could cowboys read fast?

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    172. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Self-checkout should be _strictly_ reserved for people who have about 5 things _max_.

      Yeah, self-checkout lanes are a necessity for people only buying a few items. They couldn't possibly have come up with SOME OTHER WAY of QUICKLY letting people with "5 items or less" get checked out quickly...

      Next time I go into the grocery store, I'll ask the lady that's walking around, helping people use the "self checkout" machines, if she's got any ideas how they could accomplish this, without having to buy 4 massively expensive machines, requiring continual maintenance...
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    173. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by ivan256 · · Score: 1
      At the home depot near me, those are just two extra checkouts at the other end of the store. There's no requirement that you're a contractor. They just put those there to get the average consumer to think that they're acting like a pro and prevent them from considering finding an alternate retailer. If you're buying a lot of lumber, your local lumber yard is very likely:

      • Much cheaper than Home Depot in quantity
      • Willing to deliver for free in quantity
      • The place where your local contractors shop 90% of the time


      Anybody can use Home Depot's 'Contractor Check-Out'. I use it all the time. It's just a marketing tool.
    174. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Simonetta · · Score: 1

      Thank you for your reply. I, too, will sometimes press the Spanish key in order to see if I can follow the instructions 'spoken' to me well enough to complete the process. I've never had anyone attempt to correct my choice.
          I have noticed that the spoken Spanish is exactly the same as the words displayed on the video screen as the speech synthesizer is creating the sound. I am humbled by the amount of raw brainpower it takes to actually see the exact words being spoken and make the connection between the speech and the text. I have a deep sympathy with the people who are here in the USA and don't speak or understand English very well. Mastering a new language is a major acomplishment and deserves respect regardless of how much money you earn.
          I studied French in school but never any Spanish at all. I sometimes wish that the Spanish language television stations would have optional subtitles in English (and Spanish as well) for both the anglophones who are trying to learn Spanish and the Hispanics in the USA who speak English as a primary language and Spanish poorly (if at all).
          It's surprising that there is no word in English for not being able to speak or understand the commonly used language. It's a common condition in this era of fast and inexpensive travel. I suggest 'illinguate'; a combination of illiterate and linguistics. I just love making up new words.
          Try taking a DVD of a popular Hollywood movie and selecting both Spanish subtitles and Spanish audio soundtrack. With careful listening and concentration you will notice that they are very different. It seems that most films are actually translated twice. Once for the audio spoken translation and once again for the subtitles. They are probably done by different companies. I've never seen the subtitles and foreign language subtitles match in the 50 or so DVDs that I've checked for this.

          Thanks again for your reply.

    175. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by urbanRealist · · Score: 1

      I never understood why people in America feel they have to make someone else's life shittier just to express some point. How about you write a letter....

      I'm going to get a little off-topic here, but are you kidding me? I've been involved in non-violent protest my whole life. I've never hurt anyone. I've tried to express my points not by making other people's lives shittier, but by drawing attention to myself and my cause. This approach as not worked. I have done everything from blocking traffic to writing letters in unison with thousands or hundreds of thousands of others.

      I have protested against the Iraq War and the School Of the Americas. I have protested for democracy. I think the time of letter writing and peaceful protesting is over. I think if you want to encourage anyone to do anything, it should be to at least threaten violence. I think the threat of a potentially destructive force it all we have left to accomplish change in this country.

      Personally, I do not think this particular issue is worth it. I do, however, encourage all Democrats to burn their voter registration cards and overturn their candidate's car at their state's upcoming convention.

      --
      I've seen a lot of things, but I've never been a witness.
    176. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey! Be nice! :D

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    177. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Debit cards are _by far_ the fastest way to pay if you know what you're doing.


      But you'll get 5% back with some credit cards.
    178. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do have an account on here, but out of fear of losing my job, I'm posting anonymously.

      I work at Home Depot too. You know why there's not enough staffing? Ask the CEO - he just bought a $600 million dollar home while HD's stock dropped 16% in the last year. He's too busy pimping himself out to his own special interests rather than actually doing something to improve HD's customer service. Regularly I'm the only one covering four departments in the store (basically half the store) and people yell at me for not running over to them first thing. Let them walk in my shoes for a while.

      Tired of the BS? Shop at Lowe's. Shop anywhere else. When HD starts losing even more millions in sales, maybe ol' Bob will wake the fuck up and realize how he's buttfucked HD into the biggest joke in the retail home improvement business.

      Hell, I don't even shop at HD. I go to Lowe's.

    179. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by rthille · · Score: 3, Funny

      All of a sudden, the data mining that Walmart does turns up this:

      "There sure are a lot of people buying nothing but aluminum foil"

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    180. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by RockModeNick · · Score: 1

      and I must ask why the fruit ISN'T individually barcoded, since every single piece has a sticker on it anyway, just one only grocers know the meaning of.

    181. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by instarx · · Score: 1

      If you are filling up the bagging area then.... YOU ARE TRYING TO BUY TOO MUCH STUFF USING SELF CHECKOUT!

      'SCUSE ME DUDE! See, I can shout, too. But we're talking Home Depot here where you buy BIG STUFF. Its very easy to fill up the bagging area.

    182. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by bobcote · · Score: 1

      I tried a self checkout at a Kmart. The device malfunctioned and required two cashiers and a supervisor to figure out the problem. Kmart (at least the store near me) has since removed the devices.

      As far as Home Depot and other stores, I'll use self checkout when I get a discount for doing so. Otherwise, what's the advantage?

    183. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by instarx · · Score: 1

      Do you really think this is a way to gain change? How naive. All you do is make yourself look like a jackass and no matter how valid your complaint is it will be ignored as a result.

      Ask for a manager and tell him or her, politely, how bad the self-checkout experience was for you. You will seem to be a sane, reasonable person and your opinion immediately gains weight. Sabatoging the checkout just labels you a nutcase who's opinion is worthless.

    184. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by everett · · Score: 1

      Or you (yes you personally urbanrealist, slashdot user #669888) could run for city council, state legislature, US House of Reprsentatives or US Senate.

      I'm not disagreeing with you, I too feel America is suffering from unrepresentative government. The last time I checked I wasn't an old white guy that made millions of dollars a year off my investments. I believe a good portion of our federal government could meet that description.

      My solution, I'm trying to stir up interest at local universities to endorse me as an independent candidate for the 2009 elections. I'm going to attempt my part to make a change. I'm going to tell the people that I don't have any interests of my own to protect, I only care about seeing things made better. Seeing that if you write to me saying "I'd like you to consider voting on this issue in this way" You'll get my personal response as to how I plan to vote, and my reasons why. I'd much rather see a representative that actually engages their constituents in intelligent discussion on issues before jumping off and raving about trucks and tubes.

      However, I doubt that I will get very far because I'm not a very 'safe' candidate. I'm volatile and likely to do what's good for individual citizens and not what's necessarily good for 'America the Homeland' or corporate America.

      Honestly though, what would make me happiest is to see the United States actually end up where we should be, a nation of 'United States' with the emphasis on the state as the soverign body and not on the federal government. Unfortunately that viewpoint is oft related with racism and other unpleasant viewpoints due to the Civil War so I'm pretty much doomed from the get go. But don't let that stop you, if you want to make a difference and you can't get your voice heard by those that matter, then become that person that matters.

      Just a thought, do what you will but please don't harm me.

      --
      Sig withheld to protect the innocent.
    185. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by everett · · Score: 1

      "When I grow up I want to work at the Walmart as a cashier"

      You've never been to Franlin City, VA have you? They just recently (within the past 6 years or so) got a Wal-Mart built there. It's nicer than some malls I've seen. The whole town closed down (I believe schools included) for the grand opening. It was that big of a deal.

      Of course when you consider the other alternatives for work in that area, peanut farming or moving away, I suppose the Wal-Mart fills a niche for those not strong enough for farm work and not smart enough to move away.

      --
      Sig withheld to protect the innocent.
    186. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by everett · · Score: 1

      crap, that's supposed to be 'Franklin City'.

      Preview is not my friend.

      --
      Sig withheld to protect the innocent.
    187. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by synaptik · · Score: 1
      If you are filling up the bagging area then.... YOU ARE TRYING TO BUY TOO MUCH STUFF USING SELF CHECKOUT!

      My local grocery store has 4 self-checkout lanes. There are about 8 manned checkout lanes, but I have never seen them operate more than one or two at a time. In fact they usually have maybe 2 cashiers... one of whom is overseeing the self-checkout lanes. (Albertsons has apparently scaled their front-end labor expenses waayy back in the decade since I last worked there.)

      So, if your end goal is to get throught the checkout process as quickly as possible, quite often you'll come to the conclusion that the self-service lane might be faster, even though your purchase selections are more appropriate for full-service checkout.

      In no case would I ever opt for self-checkout if I had more than 10-ish items... 20 max, just depending on what the items were. I'd also be more inclined to just wait out the full-service line if I thought the odds were high that I'd hold up a lot of people in the self-service line. But if it's clear that I've hit the tail end of a customer crush on the front end, and there's very few people coming in behind me, then I'm a bit more assertive with the use of self-checkout... as much as I hate those infernal, braindead machines.

      --
      HSJ$$*&#^!#+++ATH0
      NO CARRIER
    188. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      A few things; one, as I thought I said, this was 1999 / 2000. Two, it was at a grocery store, one of the largest in Upstate NY (they've since moved into PA and parts of VT I think).

      The system you installed can do transactions in under 5 seconds; there's still a lot out there that can't, and won't be upgraded soon. Hell, I know of a gas station were it takes 30 seconds from swipe to auth. So very good that the system you installed can do that; there are still a signifcate number out there that can't (last time I was at Wegmans they still had their old systems, 2 years ago).

    189. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot the final step: whois

    190. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Myopic · · Score: 1

      Hannafords is the bomb. I wish we had them up here in Alaska. Here all we have is Safeway, and Carrs By Safeway. Well, Fred Meyer sells groceries, too, I guess, though it's weird to buy watermelons across the isle from brassieres.

    191. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      I actually have tried that - the Spanish subtitles + dubbing thing - and noticed the same problem. It's very annoying, because using those together would be a great language-learning tool (one of the hardest things about hearing spoken language is figuring out where the word/sentence breaks are, so seeing it written out at the same time is a huge help).

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    192. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by GlacierDragon · · Score: 1

      It's the desk contractors *have* to go to because sales tax in some areas is already included on the building permit and therefore is not charged on the materials. The permit will be on record somewhere (where depending on the particular lumberyard) and will need to be looked up and associated with the purchase being made.

      --
      http://glacierdragon.smugmug.com - Check out my photos. No need to buy, even though I do need the money!
    193. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      That's an interesting way to do it.

      Around here, the taxes are handled by the state, and the permits are handled by the town (and the deeds and maps are handled by the county, guaranteeing three different trips and three different fees to get anything done). If you want sales taxes waived, you show your tax ID (glorified name for a piece of ink-jet printed cardstock that was rubber stamped) and they take down the number... But I'm pretty sure that building materials for resale via construction projects aren't tax exempt, so you're paying the sales tax regardless.

    194. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by GlacierDragon · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I think everywhere probably has their own little quirks on how this works.

      --
      http://glacierdragon.smugmug.com - Check out my photos. No need to buy, even though I do need the money!
    195. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by andrewman327 · · Score: 1

      That is exactly why my friends who work in retail universally dispise having to work self checkout. It royally sucks to have to run 4 lanes at once instead of just one.

      --
      Information wants a fueled airplane waiting at the hangar and no one gets hurt.
    196. Re:My statistical sampling of "one" matches theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a smartass question. It makes sense.

  2. unpaid labor... by macadamia_harold · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The law of unintended consequences is taking a chomp out of grocery chain profits as more stores transition from human clerks to self-service checkout technology

    They're also taking a chomp out of grocery chain profits since I refuse to shop at a store that forces me to do their work for them. What's next, stores that make you stock their shelves?

    1. Re:unpaid labor... by walnutmon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They are not forcing you to do anything, they are offering you a choice. Wait in line while the vapid clerk checks you out, or BE THE VAPID CLERK.

      I agree that self check outs suck, because they are used to cut back on staff, but I don't see it as a grocery store trying to stick it to you. People want them there, because it's their chance to play god, or checkout person. Same thing, really...

      --
      You take it, I don't want it...
    2. Re:unpaid labor... by Aadain2001 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If they pass the savings on to me, sure. Food ain't free after all.

      --
      Space for rent, inquire within
    3. Re:unpaid labor... by slowbad · · Score: 1
      I refuse to shop at a store that forces me to do their work

      It is forcing customers, at the places with multiple under-20 item checkout lanes that offer ZERO traditional cashier choices. The old fashioned queues would have people lined up five people deep if offered as an alternative.
      The alternative, of course is a professional who processes 40-45 rings per minute instead of the persons fumbling around ten times slower than that. So we've gotta stand in line at least five minutes longer than necessary? No thanks.

    4. Re:unpaid labor... by jlarocco · · Score: 1
      They're also taking a chomp out of grocery chain profits since I refuse to shop at a store that forces me to do their work for them. What's next, stores that make you stock their shelves?

      Hell yeah! I wouldn't mind so much if they gave some kind of discount.

    5. Re:unpaid labor... by nametaken · · Score: 1

      "They're also taking a chomp out of grocery chain profits since I refuse to shop at a store that forces me to do their work for them. What's next, stores that make you stock their shelves?"

      This would be funny if it weren't so damned likely.

    6. Re:unpaid labor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      ...but I like it when people check me out...

    7. Re:unpaid labor... by dagoalieman · · Score: 1

      This is of course, the model of the youth hotels in Europe. Pay less for customer labor. Would it be that bad, if it worked that way you propose?

      Sadly, for me, in corporate USA, I'd have to pay for the privledge to stock the shelves. Some money hungry people miss the point so much they miss the money.

      *sigh*

      --
      We don't need no Net Explorer We don't need no Thought control
    8. Re:unpaid labor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whats next, a store that doesn't have a butler to grab the items on your shopping list, drive them to your house, and put them in your house for you?

      My god, the arrogance of these people!

    9. Re:unpaid labor... by Neuronwelder · · Score: 1

      You are exacly right! What? They want you to to their work?! You have had a long day and now have to play the part of an unpaid cashier.

    10. Re:unpaid labor... by kfg · · Score: 1
    11. Re:unpaid labor... by grrrl · · Score: 1

      Just got back from Europe where they have a supermarket chain called LIDL that simply rips off the tops of the boxes and that is their shelving system. Cuts prices, and works well IMHO.

    12. Re:unpaid labor... by timrichardson · · Score: 1

      Well, you are quite happy to deliver the goods to your house; doing "their work for them" is a matter of definition.

    13. Re:unpaid labor... by Remillard · · Score: 1

      You have to be kidding me. I LOVE the self-checkout. I can get through them faster than it would take me to make eye contact with the human cashier. Beep, Beep, Beep. I do not want to be asked how my day is. I do not want to be asked paper or plastic. I do not want to be asked if I found everything alright. I don't want to watch them sit around waiting for someone to come bag the damn groceries. I don't want to tell them debit or credit. I just want to buy the groceries in as little time as possible and get on with my life. My wife feels the same way. She can checkout a whole cart faster than a regular cashier. The only snag is that the self-checkouts force a few things to go slower and sometimes she goes fast enough to confuse the machine.

      Long live self checkout. Saves me time, headache, and irritating personal contact with labor union cashiers.

    14. Re: unpaid labor... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      > If they pass the savings on to me, sure. Food ain't free after all.

      There area two grocery stores in my neighborhood. The one with the self-checkout charges an average of 50% more per item than the one that doesn't.

      It's also the one that's closing next month due to a lack of profitability.

      This is all about a management mentality of squeezing everything you can out of the system before it goes bankrupt.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    15. Re:unpaid labor... by carterhawk001 · · Score: 1

      The self checkout is there for those of us buying a 12 pack of beer or soda, or a box of cereal, and don't want to wait for Granny McSlow to unload her month supply of cat food. Every time I have used the self checkout it is because I had zereo desire to wait behind anyone to purchase my one or two items. Someone needs to beet you and your supporters with an obvious stick.

    16. Re: unpaid labor... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      > You have to be kidding me. I LOVE the self-checkout.

      I'd love it if it frikkin' worked. About 3/4 of the time I use it, it gets confused and I have to wait for a clerk to come fix it (if I don't just walk out mad, without a sale).

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    17. Re:unpaid labor... by rm999 · · Score: 1

      "I can get through them faster than it would take me to make eye contact with the human cashier"

      Studies have shown that self-checkout actually takes longer for the average person (ever had one of those things start blinking and make you wait for an employee?). The reason why it feels shorter is because you are in control, and hence not bored with small-talk and inane questions about what kind of bag you want.

    18. Re:unpaid labor... by freedom_india · · Score: 1
      I agree wholeheartedly with you.

      In Keene, NH, we have a very good self-checkout machine (brandnew) that works like a charm.

      The only time i got stuck was when i trying to scan a 6-pack of BUD, and the machine insisted a Cashier check my ID for age proof. Of course, that was done in under 3 seconds.

      Problem is most people have dumbed down to so low a level that a new approach to checkout makes them angry to adapt.

      Me? I like the new machines: Quick, Fast and intelligent enough to adapt to changing items.

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    19. Re:unpaid labor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A majority of grocery stores still have regular checkouts, self-express checkouts is optional.
      Even most libraries will give you the option between the two.

      Also consider the life of a cashier/clerk. There are quite a lot of clerks/cashiers at high-volume places that end up hurting themselves over time. I know at one library that at one point 50% of the staff have surgery on their wrists due to work related injuries.

    20. Re:unpaid labor... by dosius · · Score: 1

      When I go to the store that has self-checkout I use it, but only if it's all scannable items. If I can't scan something, I check out the old-fashioned way. And I do not recommend it to anyone else. It's for geeks who can scan fast and like tech. not for Jane Average.

      -uso.

      --
      What you hear in the ear, preach from the rooftop Matthew 10.27b
    21. Re:unpaid labor... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Being a cashier = playing God? How much crunch are you smoking and where can I get some? =)

      People generally use the self-check out in hopes (hopes, mind you) that it will be faster than waiting in line for the regular register and cashier.

      Nobody has directly addressed the fact that the long lines at the regular register is due to the fact that the stores in question haven't hired enough people, however. When was the last time you saw all the registers manned at the supermarket? So the consumer is not really given a choice in the matter, all other things being equal.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    22. Re:unpaid labor... by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1
      of course, because as we all know, corporations are constantly investing in new tech as they strive for greater cost-effectiveness and efficiency. Why do they strive for efficiency? So that they can faithfully and resolutely keep their profit margins FLAT, while constantly lowering the cost to the consumer!!!! Oh, and George Bush is a peacemonger.

      Where I live we have the following grocery chains, not including discount places like Save-A-Lot:

      Albertson's Winn-Dixie Kash-n-Karry Publix Pick-N-Save

      Of these, only one has U-Scan - Albertson's.

      Guess which one has the highest prices... you guessed it - Albertson's. they also have a crappy selection and lousy customer service, their scanners consistently overcharge, and the store is not well cleaned.

      Publix, on the other hand, has more employees on staff at all times, great service, a clean store, and not only do they pay their employees more, but it's employee-owned, so they get stock, etc. Better place for them to work.

      Cleaner store, better, friendlier service, well-paid employees and more people on hand, and lower prices. Imagine that.

      --
      This space available.
    23. Re:unpaid labor... by AGMW · · Score: 1
      ...but I like it when people check me out...

      Oh come on Mods ... in the absence of a "+3 Smile" this must rate a "+1 Funny" ... and I just used my mods on the stupid hydrogen powered toy story! NUTS!

      --
      Eclectic beats from Leeds, UK
      handmadehands.co.uk
    24. Re: unpaid labor... by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the new Walmart world. Because of the tiny amount walmart pays their clerks, it is cheaper to hire human labour than buy one of those machines, with costs spread out over 20 years.

    25. Re:unpaid labor... by mgblst · · Score: 1

      LIDL also stocks one of each product, and about 100 products in the whole store. You get one can of baked beans, one can of tomatoes, one big jar of olives, one small jar of olives. This means one palate of baked beans, next to one palate of canned tomatoes. And most of the stuff is from eastern europe (this is in the UK)

      They also have a unique checkout system, you wait in line before you get to the checkouts, for one to be free. Seems to work well.

      Cheaper than anything tho, and fruit and veg is half price this month...woohoo.

    26. Re:unpaid labor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next time, get a spell checker with your beer.

    27. Re:unpaid labor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Likely? Have you given no thought to the liability concerns of that plan? ...

    28. Re:unpaid labor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have shelves where you shop?

    29. Re: unpaid labor... by shmlco · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That explains why the local Wal Mart has 4 self-checkout lanes.

      Wait...

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    30. Re:unpaid labor... by jacksonj04 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Youth hostels have the right idea though. I don't mind cleaning up after myself, and as a result I get lower prices.

      Perhaps self-checkout should have a 3% price reduction?

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    31. Re:unpaid labor... by WindBourne · · Score: 1
      When was the last time you saw all the registers manned at the supermarket?

      4th of July, Memorial Day, Easter, Christmas, Thanksgiving, and Labor day.

      Nobody has directly addressed the fact that the long lines at the regular register is due to the fact that the stores in question haven't hired enough people, however.

      Actually, they hire plenty of ppl. But depending on which store, they generally do not want their ppl standing around. But they have registers for the busy days. After all, they know that if you stand around too much in a safeway, you will go to king soopers (or worse, walmart).

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    32. Re:unpaid labor... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1
      What's next, stores that make you stock their shelves?
      What do you think warehouse-style stores are? Like Costco, etc.?

      Besides the bulk discount, there is a significant discount because they don't have to stock shelves -- you're purchasing directly from their 'storage' facility.
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    33. Re:unpaid labor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>self-express checkouts "I'm checking out!!!! I'm okay and you're okay!! My feet hurt!!"

    34. Re:unpaid labor... by thbb · · Score: 1

      Actually, in large chains such as Leclerc or Carrefour, they don't need the customer to stock their shelves: they have the producers of the goods sold do it for them. This has its advantages:

      - cuts costs on permanent employees
      - the producer has a keen interest in doing the job well and create an attractive shelf.

      So the store ends up acts as a broker and supervisor between the producers and customers,
      keeping headcount to a minimum: a few supervisors and managers who just have to dispatch and monitor.

    35. Re:unpaid labor... by LoudMusic · · Score: 1

      They're also taking a chomp out of grocery chain profits since I refuse to shop at a store that forces me to do their work for them. What's next, stores that make you stock their shelves?

      They're not forcing you to do anything! Quit looking at the world through communist eyes and realize that the self-checkout is purely for your convenience. If you don't want to use it, don't. The cashier lanes are still there.

      --
      No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    36. Re:unpaid labor... by houghi · · Score: 1

      So you get a 1% reduction on you food. The rest of it will go to the CEO.

      The fact they the people who are layed off can't buy prodcts anymore from the company YOU work for (directly or indirectly) and that you therefore make 1% less, wich is a lot more then the 1% you won in the first place does not realy matter, I suppose.

      That is the reason I refuse to use such lines. As long as there are people who use the lanes where cashiers are working, these people have a job. For me that is more importand then the 1% I might save on my foodbill.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    37. Re:unpaid labor... by AnotherBlackHat · · Score: 1

      Studies have shown that self-checkout actually takes longer for the average person


      Maybe he's above average? I understand about 50% of us are.

      When I use the self check, I'm pressing the touch screen before the "OK" button even appears.
      I've learned that many of the buttons are optional, for example, you don't have to "select a payment type" you can just put your money in the machine at that point, before it even it's done asking.
      I'm probably not typical, but for me the self check is the quickest way out.

      -- Should you believe authority without question?

    38. Re:unpaid labor... by Luscious868 · · Score: 1
      They're also taking a chomp out of grocery chain profits since I refuse to shop at a store that forces me to do their work for them. What's next, stores that make you stock their shelves?

      So I take it you also opt out of doing business at any bank or credit union that offers ATMs then as well? These same tired arguments are trotted out time and time again when technology advances to a point that it allows us to automate processes that used to require some kind of manual labor. The bottom line is that these technological advances make life easier for the vast majority of the people who use them while allowing business to increase productivity which ultimately leads to either lower costs and/or a much better level of service. It's a win, win situation for everyone. I don't hear a lot of people bitching and moaning about all of the buggy whip manufacturing jobs lost due to our switch to the automobile. I don't recall hearing many complaints and demands of discounts from people who now have to dail phone numbers on their own as a result of technology advancing to the point where a third party human operators are no longer required to initiate phone calls.

    39. Re:unpaid labor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Quit looking at the world through communist eyes...


      You must be new here.
    40. Re:unpaid labor... by 14CharUsername · · Score: 1

      There ain't no such thing as a free lunch. The producer has to pay their employees so they raise the price they charge the grocery store and the grocery store passes that cost on to you.

    41. Re:unpaid labor... by 14CharUsername · · Score: 1

      They employ fewer cashiers so the line ups for them are longer. The stupid consumer sees that there is no one at the self-checkout so goes there instead. See how that works? The grocery store manipulates the consumers into using the self checkout and the consumers are so stupid that they thank the grocery store for allowing them to do all the work themselves.

      You didn't fall for it did you? People who use the self-checkout are almost as stupid as those that use the loyalty cards (Oh thank you so much for spying on my purchases mr. grocer). Its funny how many people here fall for these scams, but at the same time laugh at those who get infected with spyware and fooled 419 scams.

    42. Re:unpaid labor... by shayne321 · · Score: 1

      They're also taking a chomp out of grocery chain profits since I refuse to shop at a store that forces me to do their work for them. What's next, stores that make you stock their shelves?

      Have you BEEN to a grocery store lately? Have you SEEN the ass-monkeys they pay $5.25/hr to work the checkout lines? Believe me, I'd much rather do it myself.. I can't tell you how many times I get home and find the wasp spray in the same bag with the produce, ice-cream in the same bag with the rotisserie chicken that's 9000 degrees, etc, etc. Here's a great idea - let's put all of your groceries in the cart, then put the 40lb bag of dog food that was under the cart right damn on top of everything. Morons. 99% of the time the little 14 year old girl behind the counter is too busy flirting with the 15 year old twirp doing the bagging to pay attention to what they're doing. I say good riddance, the days of people well-paid and well-trained to know how to properly greet, check-out, and service the customer are long gone. They should be replaced by technology.

      Personally, I'm waiting for the day of RFID-enabled carts. The cart should keep inventory as I put products in, and when I'm ready to check out, I go to a terminal, wave my credit card, and I'm out the door.

      --
      Today I didn't even have to use my AK; I got to say it was a good day -- Icecube
    43. Re:unpaid labor... by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I know you are being a smart alek, but yes, that once was part of the deal, and we let that one go too. There was probably a fuss, but we didn't have slashdot, so it is hard to tell.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    44. Re:unpaid labor... by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      A majority of grocery stores still have regular checkouts, self-express checkouts is optional. Even most libraries will give you the option between the two.
      But the regular lines are understaffed, so they are taking the choice away from you.
      There are quite a lot of clerks/cashiers at high-volume places that end up hurting themselves over time. I know at one library that at one point 50% of the staff have surgery on their wrists due to work related injuries.
      So instead, I should allow myself to be hurt? I guess we know that those self-checkouts will be disappearing as soon as customers start complaining that the things mmake their wrists hurt, and that they want to talk to their lawyer.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    45. Re:unpaid labor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This sounds good, but these people are total jerks. Parking in multiple spaces, blocking the aisles. They don't care about the customers one bit. All they need to do is get the items stocked.

    46. Re:unpaid labor... by timrichardson · · Score: 1

      Actually, I was not being a smart alec. What is an alec or alek, I wonder? You can still get goods delivered, it is just comparing now with the past, the sunk cost of car ownership means the marginal cost of doing it yourself is cheaper for most people. That is, we always had the time to do it, but now we have also invested a lot of money in personal transport, and there is no refund from the car financer if we don't use our car to bring the shopping home.
      I am sure that a generation or two ago the idea of putting fuel in your car ALL BY YOURSELF was quite a shocking idea. This would seem like a very close analog to self-service checkouts, or cash machines, or ...

    47. Re:unpaid labor... by Zerbs · · Score: 1

      make eye contact with the human cashier

      hey... if the cashier is cute maybe you want to make eye contact with her

      --
      "22 astronauts were born in Ohio. What is it about your state that makes people want to flee the Earth?" Stephen Colbert
    48. Re:unpaid labor... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      What's next, stores that make you stock their shelves?

      Worse yet are the gas stations. They have "pay at the pump." That forces you to swipe your own card, rather than having someone swipe it for you. Think of all the inconvenience it causes me to have to swipe my own card. Instead, they used to come out and take my money (long before gas stations sold sports drinks and ice cream), then they made me go inside to have it rung up, and now they make me ring myself up. It's so inconvenient for me to swipe my own card, as it probably saves me a couple minutes to not have to stand in the endless lines for the one cashier. Please, oh please, take me back to the time when I was forced to walk inside for every purchase.

      Oh wait, the convenience of checking myself out at a gas station, like in a supermarket, saves me lots of time and prevents me from having to deal with minimum wage flunkies that hate their jobs. Not to mention that the gas stations that weren't open 24 hours now are because they can be opened while unmanned. Given the choice of lowering hours or adding more self-checkout, I'll take the self checkout, but then I like to shop at midnight when other people aren't there.

    49. Re:unpaid labor... by SeanMac · · Score: 1

      That'll be great until you have Mr. and Mrs. Fatty McFatterson trying to get 21$ off their 700$ weekly beer-and-taquito run, taking 45 minutes to get through the self-checkout. No thank you.

    50. Re:unpaid labor... by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I am sure that a generation or two ago the idea of putting fuel in your car ALL BY YOURSELF was quite a shocking idea. This would seem like a very close analog to self-service checkouts, or cash machines, or
      Yes, but of course, when we went from full service to self service, the savings was clear to see. The stations had both full and self serve pumps for decades, and the price was significantly cheaper for self serve. If the supermarkets did that with their self-checkout, I am sure that we would sing a different tune.
      Similarly, with ATMS, when they were introduced, my bank started instituing a $4 fee for using the teller for a service that could be performed at an ATM. Then later, they started imposing fees for using the ATM as well. Of course, I left that bank in favor of one where I can go to an ATM OR a teller for free.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    51. Re:unpaid labor... by clinton.greer · · Score: 1

      On many groceries and items from discount retailers, the margin may be less than 3%.

      The great thing about self-checkouts is that you don't have to use them if you don't want to. I agree that the usability problems (possibly design flaws?) can make purchasing some goods through a self-checkout a drag.

      Maybe it's a consumer awareness issue? As other posters have mentioned - maybe consumers just need to be aware that they should really only use self-checkouts for small purchases (5 items or less?) that would normally go through an express cashier/register.

      How many people who are complaining that they are doing the retailer's job by using a self-checkout, believe that they're doing the bank's job every time they use an ATM?

    52. Re:unpaid labor... by dagoalieman · · Score: 1

      I think you more elegantly phrased my thought (and managed to avoid the bitter tongue I take to companies in my country.) Thank you. Good to know someone got it. :)

      --
      We don't need no Net Explorer We don't need no Thought control
    53. Re:unpaid labor... by rm999 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you keeping yourself amused guessing where the buttons are is what makes you think you are getting done faster. That cashier who does nothing but ring people up 8 hours a day doesn't even have to press an "OK" button in advance. He is busy ringing up your stuff by the time you get through all the front screen crap.

    54. Re:unpaid labor... by LoudMusic · · Score: 1

      They employ fewer cashiers so the line ups for them are longer. The stupid consumer sees that there is no one at the self-checkout so goes there instead. See how that works? The grocery store manipulates the consumers into using the self checkout and the consumers are so stupid that they thank the grocery store for allowing them to do all the work themselves.

      You didn't fall for it did you? People who use the self-checkout are almost as stupid as those that use the loyalty cards (Oh thank you so much for spying on my purchases mr. grocer). Its funny how many people here fall for these scams, but at the same time laugh at those who get infected with spyware and fooled 419 scams.


      At my store the number of cashiers hasn't changed more than one or two lines, which is insignificant. And there have always only been one or two cashiers during slow hours. The difference is that they removed about three unused cashier lines to install the four self-check stations and moved one cashier to monitor them. In effect they've increased their checkout throughput. People who can check themselves out (the stupid ones, as you so elequantly put it) have four options for checkout and the smart ones who refuse to evolve can be processed by a paid checker.

      And about the 'loyalty cards', us stupid people fill out the form with false information. Try giving it an age over 65 and a lot of places will give you an additional discount on senior days (Tuesday in my town). And if you're using a credit card they're spying on your purchases anyway. BRILLIANT!

      I question your nerdituide.

      --
      No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    55. Re:unpaid labor... by jkerman · · Score: 1

      im not going to buy gas from a place that wont even make me walk inside and stand in line to take my money! what next, making me pump my own gas?!

  3. Breaking Unions is priceless by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    10 years ago a grocer's cashier had a career, now he's a 'Courtesy Clerk' earning $6 bucks/hr.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Breaking Unions is priceless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you call $17.50 an hour a career, I have news for you.

    2. Re:Breaking Unions is priceless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't cry over it. I would rather destroy cashier as a career in order to maybe *gasp* give that person a reason to learn a real skill. High minimum wage does this too... why do we want to encourage people to never learn real skills?

    3. Re:Breaking Unions is priceless by hab136 · · Score: 0, Troll
      earning $6 bucks/hr.

      Six dollars bucks per hour? Does he deposit that money into his ATM machine using his PIN number?

    4. Re:Breaking Unions is priceless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $17.50 an hour is a career for alot of people in the USA.

    5. Re:Breaking Unions is priceless by IANAAC · · Score: 2, Informative
      Maybe this isn't typical, but I know someone who works at a national grocery chain - and he's pulling in 48K a year, working 34-36 hours a week. Granted, he also does other things, such as stock shelves, inventory, etc. (He's not a manager. His title is "Checker").

      I would say that the Union to which he belongs plays a significant role in what he makes.

    6. Re:Breaking Unions is priceless by Dark_MadMax666 · · Score: 1

      Fuck this "career" . In a black period of my life I worked as a cashier in food store. -Thats most mind numbing ,most unsatisfying job I ever had unpleasure to slave . If being midnless retarded drone is your idea of "career" ... I would prefer working as net admin for $6 than cashier for $17.5

    7. Re:Breaking Unions is priceless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason the one guy you knows is pulling in 48k a year is because he has been working there as a checker or food clerk (food stocker) and has his wages "grandfathered" from the last contract. All the people hired since the last contract was put in place can never hope to make that much as they are on a newer contract that has much less desirably pay scales. For one thing, there is more tiers before the clerk will hit the top pay bracket and 2nd, the top is still lower then what your friend is making.

      In a way it makes me laugh to read everyone being unhappy with self checkouts and how many people get there and are basically clueless as to how to get through it. I am willing to bet at least a couple of these people are the same people that were very pissed off at the people striking a couple of years ago in Southern California to try and negotiate a better contract. I mean, those selfish strikers wanted to keep wages up so someone actually wanted to work at the grocery store and do a good job, hence driving up all the common mans food prices. lol, sucks just as much before and prices aren't any better are they?

      Sorry for the last rant but yeah.

      Brendan

    8. Re:Breaking Unions is priceless by symbolic · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That depends - I have a friend who was introduced to the world of grocery not too long ago, and who filled me in on some of the details. For career cashiers (and yes, they do exist), they can be making 2-3 times that. If you happen to get into a "key" position (which typically aren't cashiers), the starting pay can be anywhere from $9/hr or so, up to around $16/hr. That may vary of course, depending on which part of the country you happen to be in.

    9. Re:Breaking Unions is priceless by loraksus · · Score: 1

      Shit, $17.50 is a good career for a hundred million plus people in the usa.
      There are many, many jobs that pay far, far worse.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    10. Re:Breaking Unions is priceless by mshmgi · · Score: 0

      The same thing has happened w/ bank tellers. In 1999, my company helped launch a regional bank's online banking system. At that time, the average cost to the bank per over the counter teller transaction was close to $1.00. The average cost to the bank for ATM transactions was $0.25. The average cost to the bank of online banking transactions was $0.02.

      I hear bankers are really good at math.

      As a general rule any job that can be done by a machine, eventually will be done by a machine.

    11. Re:Breaking Unions is priceless by radiotalent · · Score: 1
      If you call $17.50 an hour a career, I have news for you.


      Hopefully I took this the wrong way, so I'll hash both sides.

      If you intended to highlight that a career is not the wage you make, then kudos.

      However, if you meant to say that $17.50 an hour didn't make for good wages, I take exception with that. Figuring a 36 hour work week, 52 weeks a year, you get $32,760 a year. That exceeds the median income for households in two states (according to the 2000 census). A second household member working part time 20 hours a week (even at the Federal minimum wage of $5.15 an hour) would increase the household income above the median in 10 states.

      If you're living in an area where housing costs are exceeding the median rental cost of $602 by a factor of two or three, then yes, $33K isn't going to cut it. But in many areas of the United States, there would be no shortage of people clamoring for a job at $17.50 an hour, especially for a semi-skilled job (no offense intended to checkers).
    12. Re:Breaking Unions is priceless by jackbird · · Score: 1
      At that time, the average cost to the bank per over the counter teller transaction was close to $1.00. The average cost to the bank for ATM transactions was $0.25. The average cost to the bank of online banking transactions was $0.02.

      I hear bankers are really good at math.

      Then how come I get charged for using an ATM, while teller service is free?

      Of course, I've never really understood the point of a bank branch at all except as a place to install safe deposit boxes, and haven't lived in the same state as my bank in a long time.

    13. Re:Breaking Unions is priceless by egriebel · · Score: 2, Insightful
      10 years ago a grocer's cashier had a career

      Surely you must be joking, who would consider hitting buttons like a monkey on Jolt watching crap going by on a moving belt a career? Maybe a "job for life" but certainly not a career. How many little boys or girls say to their parents, "When I grow up I want to be a checkout clerk!"

      But, there is a bright side, unlike software development, cashiering cannot be outsourced.

      --
      ACHTUNG! Das computermachine ist nicht fuer gefingerpoken und mittengrabben. Ist nicht fuer gewerken bei das dumpkopfen.
    14. Re:Breaking Unions is priceless by Nimey · · Score: 1

      Have you ever had the pleasure of working in fast food? I've done that and been a grocery store clerk/sacker, and I'll take working in the grocery store every time. It's not hot, you don't go home covered in oil, customers aren't as crabby, you don't get as dirty, you don't have to pick up after those gorram teenage kids so much, and there's more choices in jobs if you want to stick around for a while, instead of just advancing to manglement.

      That said, I'm much happier as a university IT tech. Having to just sit at a register for eight hours a day sucks and it's hard on the back and feet, plus I'm paid more than 3x as much and I actually get stuff accomplished besides making money.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    15. Re:Breaking Unions is priceless by jefu · · Score: 1

      Of course, nobody wants to grow up to be a checkout clerk.

      But kids don't take school seriously (who can blame them, it is a system far from serious) and don't go to college (or do go to college and major in some nonsense major just cuz it looks easy). Some of them teach themselves and succeed, many end up with no skills and not much to do. For someone like this, a good chance of keeping a job for years and working their way up the pay scale is a very good deal indeed.

    16. Re:Breaking Unions is priceless by mshmgi · · Score: 0

      Then how come I get charged for using an ATM, while teller service is free? Sounds like oyu need to change banks. Most banks only charge other banks' customers for using their ATM machines - and weel they should. You wouldn't expect the Chevy dealer to honor your Ford's warranty - so why expect "Bank A" to dole out its money to customers of "Bank B" free of charge? Fees charged to non-customers are what keep most of those tellers employed.

    17. Re:Breaking Unions is priceless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Shit, $17.50 is a good career for a hundred million plus people in the usa. There are many, many jobs that pay far, far worse.

      Such as tech support, PHP web development, etc...

    18. Re:Breaking Unions is priceless by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Because you have an account at a bank, instead of a credit union.

      My CU doesn't charge ANYONE (yes, including non-members) to use their ATMs. That good will is why I openned an account with them.

    19. Re:Breaking Unions is priceless by jackbird · · Score: 1
      Actually, I have both. It's the bank whose ATM I use that charges a fee that's well beyond reasonable.


      I go into a bank where I'm not an account holder, and I can get $20 in quarters from a teller at no extra charge.

      At that same bank, making an ATM withdrawal can cost me as much as $2.50.

    20. Re:Breaking Unions is priceless by Dark_MadMax666 · · Score: 1

      Ok from personal experience thats all balooney . In a big chain food store I worked as cahsier/stocker typical pay for cahiers was $7/h .I worked for $9 and that was only because I did night shifts at start. Stocker get payed 8-9$ , very good stocker with 3 year experience after several "raises" was making $10 .Now "key positions" (such as depart manager, cashier supervisor ) were paid whopping $12-$14 and hour. Heck freaking assitant store manager was making only $16/h .

        That was in North Virginia. ANd I do know that other food stores were paying same scale . Walmart in the area paid less. Non-food stores (kohl's, sears) paid little bit more. But- all of them were around lower ~$10 bracket for starting positions and ~$15 for "key".

    21. Re:Breaking Unions is priceless by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

      My point is that's changing with the event of Self Service grocers. They're breaking the Unions, because the people who watch the self serve lanes are being hired as baggers, not checkers. That's a $6/hr job with small raises instead of a $17/hr job with good raises.

      --
      Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    22. Re:Breaking Unions is priceless by crabpeople · · Score: 1

      Thats funny because one of the CSR's said to me onetime that no little girl ever grows up wanting to work in a call centre. And yet the call centre is full of them. When i was a kid i wanted to be an astronaut. Kids have all sorts of unrealistic dreams. No one dreams of paying the rent or car insurance when they are a kid either.

      Most jobs are nothing more than "pushing buttons". Thats the way the world turns. Many people, all pushing their little buttons. A career just means you get paid more to push your button. Oh and you also get to look down on everyone who pushes a button for less money. Thats the main reason people go to college.

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    23. Re:Breaking Unions is priceless by kabocox · · Score: 1

      10 years ago a grocer's cashier had a career, now he's a 'Courtesy Clerk' earning $6 bucks/hr.

      10 years from now, you won't have courtesy clerk's but loss prevention specialist that supervise 10 of machines and make min. wage for the time.

    24. Re:Breaking Unions is priceless by kchrist · · Score: 2, Insightful
      unlike software development, cashiering cannot be outsourced.

      Wouldn't you consider replacing human cashiers with self-checkout machines a form out outsourcing? The end result is the same.
    25. Re:Breaking Unions is priceless by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      A career is not getting paid more to push the buttons. A career is when you have hope in the future of pushing the same buttons for more money, or fancier buttons for more money, and possibly in your own office, and possibly supervising other button pushers. A career is when you are offered the chance to become more successful personally if your button pushing leads to more profitability for the company.
      Personally, I am pretty well paid. Not as well as I would like to be. But I have no career. None whatsoever. It's a job.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    26. Re:Breaking Unions is priceless by egriebel · · Score: 1
      Wouldn't you consider replacing human cashiers with self-checkout machines a form out outsourcing? The end result is the same.
      Very interesting point! People will say "there's no way we could replace all cashiers! They perform a useful service." Yet, look at how many gas station attendants there are (outside of NJ, of course). Now, you have a Hess station with 16 pumps and a single person behind the counter, who also happens to supervise its quick-e-mart too.
      --
      ACHTUNG! Das computermachine ist nicht fuer gefingerpoken und mittengrabben. Ist nicht fuer gewerken bei das dumpkopfen.
    27. Re:Breaking Unions is priceless by Zerbs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know someone who 3 years ago tried to get a job at a conveniece store as a cashier, they wouldn't take her though because they were in a union, and she had left a grocery store 11 years before that and they said she had to pay 11 years in back dues to the union. What did the union do for her those 11 years? diddly squat!

      --
      "22 astronauts were born in Ohio. What is it about your state that makes people want to flee the Earth?" Stephen Colbert
    28. Re:Breaking Unions is priceless by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      They certainly are. Which is why they charge $2 per foreign transaction. When they've got you by the short hairs, they can charge you whatever they want. Since there's no advantage to them of lowering rates, they all settle around the same fee. $1 vs $2 won't bring enough extra traffic to justify the diference, and could result in higher usage that would drain the ATM more quickly. Nobody likes an empty ATM.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    29. Re:Breaking Unions is priceless by evilviper · · Score: 1
      he's pulling in 48K a year, working 34-36 hours a week. [...] I would say that the Union to which he belongs plays a significant role in what he makes.

      "Nice lil store ya got here. It'd be a shame if somethin' were ta happen ta it."
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    30. Re:Breaking Unions is priceless by MirrororriM · · Score: 1
      10 years ago a grocer's cashier had a career, now he's a 'Courtesy Clerk' earning $6 bucks/hr.

      Well that's more retarded than a Wal-Mart greeter!

      (I apologize to any retards that were offended by this post)

      --
      Content Management System: A pretentious way of saying "text editor."
    31. Re:Breaking Unions is priceless by kraut · · Score: 1

      >You wouldn't expect the Chevy dealer to honor your Ford's warranty - so why expect "Bank A" to dole out its money to customers of "Bank B" free of charge? Fees charged to non-customers are what keep most of those tellers employed.

      This has always struck me as a badly missed opportunity: Of course honouring a car warranty incurs a significant cost; the cost of performing an ATM transaction for another bank's customer is neglibile, particularly since it's effectively netted off against your customers using the other bank's ATMs. What's lacking is targeted marketing: if I'm using Bank X's ATM, they know I'm a bank Y customer - why don't they tell me that my savings could earn an extra .02% in their account? or I could borrow .05% cheaper? Or their account charges are Z less?

      Sounds like a great way of getting free advertising out of your ATM network to me.

      --
      no taxation without representation!
  4. Over-paranoid machines by Majik+Sheff · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The self-checkout lanes at my local grocer have a sensor system that basically demands staff intervention for every customer. If you don't place the item in just the right spot after scanning, the damned thing is automatically convinced that the user is trying to pull a fast one. The self checkout lanes stand empty most of the time because of it.

    --
    Women are like electronics: you don't know how damaged they are until you try to turn them on.
    1. Re:Over-paranoid machines by GoatMonkey2112 · · Score: 1

      That's true. But you know what I do? I slam my oversized too heavy item on the bagging area and pray that the thing breaks.

    2. Re:Over-paranoid machines by NFNNMIDATA · · Score: 1

      I remember at one store the person manning the busy self-checkout lines' "supervisor" station was just standing there talking to another employee and clearing the (frequent) self-scan errors ("please place item","please remove item","please wait for assistance", etc) as they came up without even looking at the screen.

  5. in the case of washers.. by 512k · · Score: 4, Interesting

    self checkout doesn't work well, because the system checks to see if you honest by weighing what's in your bag.
    Washers are so light, that it often doesn't recognize that they're there. So you have to see that it didn't work; read the screen to find out what happened, read the screen to see what to do...rescan, or pick the bag up and put it down on the pad again, read the screen to see if that worked,

    wash rinse repeat

    I don't buy washers from home depot, but I do buy a packet or two of screws, and this happens all the time.

    --
    ------ Work is so much easier when you don't
    1. Re:in the case of washers.. by CMRichar · · Score: 0

      you think washers are bad? go to a local megamart that uses self-scan lanes when they're having a huge special on say, kool-aid.

      *disclaimer*: i work as a cashier at a local megamart. i've run the u-scans. people are only slightly smarter than the ground upon which they stand while using uscan.

      the scale has problems picking up kool-aid, greeting cards, light packets of sauce mixes, anything that weighs 2 oz. and yet, people will try to go through with 30 packets of kool-aid "because it's faster."

      --
      "Good night, good work, sleep well, I'll most likely kill you in the morning." - Dread Pirate Roberts
    2. Re:in the case of washers.. by sgbett · · Score: 0

      Keep putting the washers/screws in the bag until it shuts up. *Then* scan the next item ;)

      After all, the machine is telling you to "place item in bagging area", who are you to argue!

      --
      Invaders must die
    3. Re:in the case of washers.. by kaszeta · · Score: 1
      That's the problem I regularly have. Scan item. Place item in bagging area like it tells me to. It still asks me to place the item in the bagging area. Wait for clerk. Have clerk tell me I'm stupid.

      That routine was old the first time. Seeing that happens about half the time I attempt to use self checkout, I've since written it off as unreliable technology.

    4. Re:in the case of washers.. by iainl · · Score: 1

      Your 'problem' is that you're placing the washers in the bag. I had the same problem, until I realised that it all goes just fine if you throw the small items in with a fair bit of force.

      The trick is to never buy anything that is both light and delicate.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    5. Re:in the case of washers.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've noticed that it doesn't work with washers too. But it does work with dryers. They seem to be heavy enough. I bought my last dryer at Home Depot... self-checkout... put it in a bag... no problems.

    6. Re:in the case of washers.. by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Just grab something a bit heavier - some loose change, for example, and put it on the plate with the washers. Then put the extra item on the bag carousel, but not in your bag. I actually had a problem buying two serrano peppers at a normal terminal one day at Kroger. The answer was to add a penny to the scale so that it could register the minimum weight (a couple hundreths of a pound).

      On the general topic, I find the self checkouts amazingly quick, and was thrilled to find that HD had added them. They're rarely busy, and with the exception that I can scan and bag faster than the machine can register, they're pretty efficient. Still, I'll go to a regular line if I've got a bunch of non-barcoded stuff (produce, etc). It's not worth navigating the several selection layers per item.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  6. Condoms and Twinkies by walnutmon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Put condoms and twinkies right next to the self check counter... Sit back and reap the benefits!

    --
    You take it, I don't want it...
    1. Re:Condoms and Twinkies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand, how do you eat a twinkie when it's in a condom?

    2. Re:Condoms and Twinkies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Is that a "cover all the bases" impule buy? I mean, stereotypically, either you're in great shape and getting some from women you are not married to, meaning you need lots of condoms, or you just don't care and want the twinkies.

    3. Re:Condoms and Twinkies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just want to fuck the Twinkie.

    4. Re:Condoms and Twinkies by kfg · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah, if I could actually impulse buy a twinkie in the supermarket I guess I'd pick up the condoms then too. Only makes sense. You don't know where she's been, but you can imagine.

      I'm afraid we have laws against that around here though.

      KFG

    5. Re:Condoms and Twinkies by initialE · · Score: 1

      Goodness, this is for the slashdot reader all right. Encouraging obesity and blocking procreation at the same time. Pure genius.

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
    6. Re:Condoms and Twinkies by loraksus · · Score: 1

      Perhaps condoms and warm apple pie would go together quite well.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    7. Re:Condoms and Twinkies by cartman94501 · · Score: 1

      Better yet, stick the Twinkies inside the condoms and put that it in the self-checkout area. You're far better off sticking a Twinkie with a condom on it up any bodily orifice than you are sticking an unwrapped Twinkie in your mouth.

    8. Re:Condoms and Twinkies by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      Of course you do. I mean, they don't have three holes for nothing...

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    9. Re:Condoms and Twinkies by glsunder · · Score: 1

      and have kids trying to stuff twinkies into condoms... due to religious right parents telling their kids they're to keep the twinkies fresh.

    10. Re:Condoms and Twinkies by realisticradical · · Score: 1
      I think the rationalle was to have the 'embarrassing' items at the self check out isle. (Though, I figure buying condoms should be something to show off, especially for slashdot readers.)


      Then again if you're embarrassed about buying something the booming voice announcing to the whole world what you just scanned wouldn't help much. I'd rather the cashier be the one person in the world who knows.

  7. Absolutely... by evilviper · · Score: 4, Funny

    I have no time to look at impulse items... I'm too busy slamming my fist against the screen, trying to get the dammed thing to work.

    And I'm still waiting to recieve my paycheck for my part-time job as a bag-boy and cashier...

    It's not a xenophobic thing. It's a "Those fucking things never work right" thing.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:Absolutely... by Jonner · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, it would be xenophia if you didn't like to use a cashier lane staffed by a foreigner. If you were afraid of the machines, it would be technophobia.

    2. Re:Absolutely... by Jussi+K.+Kojootti · · Score: 1

      Xenophobia: fear and hatred of strangers or foreigners or of anything that is strange or foreign.

      (Merriam-Webster)

    3. Re:Absolutely... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      And it would be xenuphobia if he didn't like to use a cashier lane staffed by a scientologist.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    4. Re:Absolutely... by acq3 · · Score: 1

      The machines are made in China? xeno-techno-phobia?

    5. Re:Absolutely... by Jonner · · Score: 1

      "Xenophobia denotes a phobic attitude towards strangers or of the unknown and comes from the Greek words (xenos), meaning "foreigner", "stranger", and (phobos), meaning "fear"."

      From www.reference.com

    6. Re:Absolutely... by db32 · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I have only had a few issues with these things. I have been using these things since they first started hitting stores and very rarely do they give me headache. (Not that they don't ever...kinda like using Windows...never quite sure when its going to blow up, but you can bet your ass its going to be at the worst possible time). My biggest problem is PEOPLE! I have sat in line at Walmart for 40 minutes while the woman in front of me argued with the Cashier about buying 50 freaking towels at 10 cents cheaper each...and then proceded to argue about how Food Lion has some stupid buy 1 get 1 free deal on the chips she was buying, and how they let her only buy one at half price instead of buying two...and then proceded to send her husband back for price checks on a dozen other items in her cart she wanted to pay 10-50 cents less on.

      So even assuming that my time is only worth $6/hr...the 10 minutes it would have taken me to run my FULL cart through a self checkout instead of standing behind that loon would have been $3 worth of time. I make considerably more than $6/hr, so realistically it would have been more than $3.

      These things have their issues...but people have FAR MORE and MORE COMPLEX issues than one of these electronic talking monstrosities could ever have. "Place item in bag...Scan next item...Place item in bag...Scan next item...Place item in bag...Laugh at the fool behind you that can't find bagging area full button....laugh at cashier that can't figure out how to make it stop complaining either...Leave store...Have a nice day."

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    7. Re:Absolutely... by MechaStreisand · · Score: 1

      ". . . attitude towards strangers or of the unknown . . ."

      Sir, you do realize that you just proved yourself wrong, don't you?

      --
      Disclaimer: IANAL. This post is, however, legal advice, and creates an attorney-client relationship.
    8. Re:Absolutely... by Jonner · · Score: 1

      All of the definitions I found emphasize the fear of foreigners, which is what the original Greek literally means. A few definitions add "or of the unknown," as an afterthought, but most don't. Also, what exactly was unknown? The poster seemed pretty familiar with the uselessness of self-checkout systems?

    9. Re:Absolutely... by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      Aside from the bagging area, the ones we have in my local Sainsburies (UK) seem to be fairly logical. It's all touchscreen, the card and cash slots are well placed and the barcode scanner interprets labels held at strange angles. It even makes a logical guess at when the bagging area is full because all the weight suddenly vanished. There's one clerk watching over all four of the units so it's difficult to pocket items, and if it needs age verification the clerk has a single button on their pedestal to verify your age (usually on appearance alone).

      All that said, I can't understand this bagging weight thing. You've scanned and item and are thus paying for it anyway, why should the machine care if you put it in a bag or not?

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    10. Re:Absolutely... by Pollardito · · Score: 1
      I have no time to look at impulse items... I'm too busy slamming my fist against the screen, trying to get the dammed thing to work.
      that's why they need to have "impulse hammers" and "impulse guns" in the self-checkout line, the items that are chosen have to reflect the mood of the person in line
    11. Re:Absolutely... by bitt3n · · Score: 1
      xenophobic? you think these machines are aliens?

      are you sure that slamming a technologically advanced race of alien robots in the face is really a good idea?

    12. Re:Absolutely... by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      Because theoretically, the machine knows how much an item weighs, so you can't scan one cheaper thing, set it on the rack, and drop in something more expensive.

    13. Re:Absolutely... by loic_2003 · · Score: 1

      And I'm still waiting to recieve my paycheck for my part-time job as a bag-boy and cashier...

      My sentiments exactly. It reminds me of the US tipping system. Everyone is expected to tip the pizza delivery guy because they are paid less as management presume the buyer will pay a tip. Therefore the pizza company has lumbered paying their staff directly onto the consumer thus incresing their profits. That $9.99 pizza you ordered actually is ~$15.99 or whatever...

      Not cool.

    14. Re:Absolutely... by Jerf · · Score: 1

      I think I see the problem. You posted the word (and I quote) "xenophia". You thought you were posting "xenophobia". However, your misspelling looks closer to the word "xenophilia", which is actually the exact opposite.

      On first reading, I thought you meant xenophilia as well.

    15. Re:Absolutely... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Good god, how much are you tipping? Even a 20% tip is only $2.

    16. Re:Absolutely... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Actually, it would be xenophia if you didn't like to use a cashier lane staffed by a foreigner.

      New, high-tech checkout methods are new, unkown, foreign (in the non-literal sense), etc.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    17. Re:Absolutely... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      So even assuming that my time is only worth $6/hr...the 10 minutes it would have taken me to run my FULL cart through a self checkout instead of standing behind that loon would have been $3 worth of time. I make considerably more than $6/hr, so realistically it would have been more than $3.

      The disconnect here is that you're not realizing the slow checkout is an ARTIFICAL LIMITATION, created by that store to begin with.

      Just ask yourself how many extra extra cashiers they could afford to have working, if they didn't spend that money on the automatic checkout machines in the first place.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    18. Re:Absolutely... by kthejoker · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with Luddite? Phobia implies a kind of paralyzing fear, Luddism is more like "aggressive opposition."

    19. Re:Absolutely... by db32 · · Score: 1

      Stupid people are not an ARTIFICIAL LIMITATION. Generally I can get through the automatic checkout faster than a normal line anyways, regardless of how many cashiers are there. I generally prefer the autocheckouts because they are typically faster for me. I also tend to believe in the long run they will save more money than paying the workers. (Oh dear, think of the workers...well an unfortunate fact of modern life is that more and more jobs are being replaced by machines...so it would behoove you to actively seek employment skills not likely to be replaced by machines). So in theory (yes companies are evil...I don't trust most, but this is /. so must amplifiy that a bit) I should be getting lower prices due to lower costs. That and I'm not so full of myself that I am somehow offended by scanning and bagging my own groceries. I carry them to the car myself, and unbag them at home myself. It also lets me make sure I bag my stuff the way I want it to make it easier to unbag later. So...the time savings are well in the positive for me on an auto checkout.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    20. Re:Absolutely... by Jonner · · Score: 1

      If you thought the term in question "xenophilia," then why did you quote a definition for "xenophobia?"

  8. A few solutions: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Marginally increase the time between the self checkout's stages, such that customers will spend, on average, a few seconds more while checking out. This has a two-fold benefit: 1) the longer the customer takes, the more potential there is for a line to develop at the self checkout line, forcing some of them to revert to a standard issue checkout, and 2) the customer checking out will have more time to idle, look around, and potentially pick up something else, which leads me to ....

    2. Near the end of the transaction (after swiping his or her credit card), ask the customer if he/she would like to add any last minute items. The customer can press 'NO' and the transaction will just complete. If they press 'YES' (after seeing that oh-so-tasty snickers bar), they'll go back to the scanning screen where they can scan their snickers bar. The checkout button will then be replaced with a 'Complete Transaction' button which will charge the card, print the receipt, and send them off. The store could even go so far as to offer a special 'last minute' discount (like a couple of cents off said snickers bar) to further entice the customer.

    3. Close all self checkouts, return to 1995.

    1. Re:A few solutions: by walnutmon · · Score: 1

      Why don't you just stick the "target" with consumer syrum and start depositing shit they don't want into their cart for them... It would be less annoying than your "prompt for shit you don't want idea", and probably more successful.

      Am I the only person who wants to open fire on school children when I am about to pump gas, I swipe my card at the fuel pump, and then it asks me "Would you like a car wash?"...

      FUCK YOU MARKETING SWINE!

      --
      You take it, I don't want it...
    2. Re:A few solutions: by plover · · Score: 1
      Marginally increase the time between the self checkout's stages, such that customers will spend, on average, a few seconds more while checking out

      Uhh...no. Even with only one cashier per four lanes, it's in the stores best interersts to push people through the lines faster, not slower. First, cashiers have a per-hour cost. Dividing it by four allows a store to be a bit slower, but not much. Besides, "slower checkout" just pisses people off these days, and they're likely to drop their purchase on the floor and walk out if they have to wait too long. Those former-customers are tough to get to come back, too. While it might work fine at a Bose speaker store, intentionally slowing down the checkout process is not a good business practice in a high-volume chain-store.

      --
      John
    3. Re:A few solutions: by kfg · · Score: 1

      1. Marginally increase the time between the self checkout's stages . . .

      They do. Have you noticed why people here say they don't use them?

      KFG

  9. wait a minute... by jimfinity · · Score: 4, Interesting

    are they implying that those self-checkout lanes are faster?

    it seems that every time i go through one of those things i have to get some manager over there to "ok" my purchases. whether it's a "violent adult videogame" (half-life 2) or isopropyl alcohol to keep my car's gas lines freeze free (recreational drinking?).

    they've been such a hassle for me i don't even use them anymore.

    1. Re:wait a minute... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      I think that "suicidal drinking" would be a more apt description if you're imbibing isopropyl alcohol.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    2. Re:wait a minute... by Jonner · · Score: 1

      It's probably not healthy for either your car or body to ingest isopropyl. Ethanol in moderate amounts is unlikely to be harmful to either.

    3. Re:wait a minute... by loraksus · · Score: 1

      I knew (the past tense will soon become quite clear) a guy who did a 10 year stint in a soviet gulag. He used to get ether from the "doctor"'s office, fill a small glass with it and shoot it - the thing (apparantly) with ether is that you can't let the gasses build up, so you have to stop breathing for a while and let the majority of the gasses evaporate. A big belch and he'd enter his happy place for 6 hours.
      Crazy.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    4. Re:wait a minute... by sasdrtx · · Score: 1
      I use self-checkouts at Kroger all the time. They're faster for me, up to a couple of dozen items anyway. And I can avoid idiot stores/cashiers who:
      • Insist on placing no more than 2 or 3 items per plastic bag, making my groceries into a pile of trash.
      • Making me reach over and swing my 12-pack across the scanner because the checkout chick isn't quite 19 yet
      • Require a 2-3 minute wait (at best) to run get cigarettes from somewhere inconvenient
      • Require me to commit to a line behind someone who is sure to cause a ten-minute delay because some can of beans is supposed to be 2/$1 today, not $.59

      --
      Most people don't even think inside the box.
  10. They'll just add more machines to distract/amuse by syousef · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hell a few TV sets with moving content would do it for most of the ADHD cattle out there. Oh look it's my favourite show....oh now it's moved to that screen over there, I think I'll follow...oooohh look a pretty shiny thing. I want to take that home. I'll just add that to my trolley.

    Perhaps I should patent this and make a bundle ;-)

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  11. Solution: Take a Cue from Vegas by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 4, Funny

    The easy solution for this is to follow the lead of Las Vegas casinos. Basically you want to make it as hard as possible to leave the store with money. Hide the registers behind a wall of mirrors. Funnel the customer through a gauntlet of racks of impulse buy goods before the can get to the check out*. Put speed bumps on the floor. Offer free cocktails and a $5.99 prime rib buffet.

    *Fry's Electronics already uses this technique.

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    1. Re:Solution: Take a Cue from Vegas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, I see you've been to Ikea.

    2. Re:Solution: Take a Cue from Vegas by waferhead · · Score: 1

      "...Offer free cocktails and a $5.99 prime rib buffet.

      *Fry's Electronics already uses this technique."...

      You.....Lieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!

      Nobody told me! ARRRRHHGHGHHHHHHHHHHHHH!

      Seriously, The Frys in Plano, Tx at least has a really nice "coffee house" stuck right in the middle.
      It's a dangerous, dangerous place to lose a few (hours) with a book, drinking coffee and munching sandwiches.
      The prices are even not too bad.

    3. Re:Solution: Take a Cue from Vegas by waferhead · · Score: 1

      After taking my meds, I now think the maze-lined-with-goodies is the technique the parent was referring to.
      My bad.

    4. Re:Solution: Take a Cue from Vegas by friedmud · · Score: 1

      Even before I read your footnote I knew you would be referring to Fry's.

      For me, the funny part about Fry's is that it _works_. Every damn time I'm in there to buy an ink cartridge or whatever electronic equipment... I _always_ end up buying candy on the way out. I _know_ what they are doing, and I think about it as I pick up the packet of candy... but I just can't help myself... sigh.

      Also... have you noticed that Best Buy has gone down this same road? BestBuy used to have multiple queues (atlest the one in my hometown did)... but now they have gone to the single queue with the maze through the impulse stuff... for some reason it doesn't work as well as Fry's (on me anyway!).

      Friedmud

    5. Re:Solution: Take a Cue from Vegas by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 3, Funny

      I've decided that Hell must be very much like Ikea on a rainy Saturday afternoon.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    6. Re:Solution: Take a Cue from Vegas by CCFreak2K · · Score: 1

      Fry's and, to a lesser extent, some places like CD shops, but most definitely Fry's.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master."
    7. Re:Solution: Take a Cue from Vegas by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Also Border's Books, although they're slightly less obvious about it. Still, what other section of Border's has candy? That seems to be the tip off.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    8. Re:Solution: Take a Cue from Vegas by DDLKermit007 · · Score: 1

      And I can attest to that living in Las Vegas. Fry's little impulse buy line has it's own unintended consequences on me given it's one of the reasons I stay the hell away from the store (besides the employees annoy the hell out of me) because I have no self control through there. Especially if I'm with someone else. Instead if I need something "now" and can't wait to order it online I goto Best Buy. They are trieing to do the same thing here, but they are nowhere near as good at it.

    9. Re:Solution: Take a Cue from Vegas by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Funnel the customer through a gauntlet of racks of impulse buy goods before the can get to the check out*

      Grocery floorplaning and mechandising is already a highly studied science. They already run you by a ton of impluse buys - as soon as you walk in the store. If you are there for any sort of pedestrian good you always have to walk the entire length of the store to get it. In the process you usually pass all kinds of knicknacks and quickees.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    10. Re:Solution: Take a Cue from Vegas by jrumney · · Score: 1

      If you are there for any sort of pedestrian good you always have to walk the entire length of the store to get it.

      It depends on the item. Supermarkets around here have figured out that customers will chose the lunch-bar down the road rather than walk through the supermarket and wait in a checkout queue for the high-markup ready-to-eat food that people are likely to want for lunch. So they have all that at the front of the store, next to the cigarette counter where people can be in and out quickly. But milk, bread, and other staples are always up the back, as you say.

    11. Re:Solution: Take a Cue from Vegas by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Actually, the "deli" type installations are part of the impulse buy category and are almost always towards the front. It isn't the people go to the market for a meal, but rather that they go to the market to shop and then realize that they are hungry enough to pick up a snack as they walk through the "deli" to get to the pedestrian stuff.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    12. Re:Solution: Take a Cue from Vegas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take a cue from Toys R Us... while in college, I worked there one summer. I noticed that, unlike almost any other grocery or retail store I can think of, there was no way to leave the store without going through a register line, and all register lines had lockable half-doors that were closed when the cashier was away from their station. All right, you *could* step over one of those, but that would have been a bad idea given the paranoid nature of the store (look, a man jumping over the lockable half-door! I bet he's stealing something!). Basically there was no way you were leaving without walking right by a cashier and several shelves of "buy me now" items.

    13. Re:Solution: Take a Cue from Vegas by Schnapple · · Score: 1
      The easy solution for this is to follow the lead of Las Vegas casinos
      On some level, stores already do this. Notice how with the exception of the front of the store there's no windows. If they do then they're tinted. Notice how newer grocery stores only have "windows" in the respect that the doors are made of glass - and they're only on the opposing sides of the store (as opposed to the middle). Also there's never any clocks in the store, ever. The reason? Don't ever let the consumer know what time of day it is - they might realize they're running late and leave quicker.

      Also, notice how in most grocery stores the milk is at the back of the store - if there's one entrance to the store then the milk is as far away from the store as possible - this means you walk past a lot of the store just getting there. Since milk is something you have to buy often (it goes bad quickly and lots of recipes use it, as well as cereal) they know you'll be there semi-frequently just to get it. So make sure the customer sees as much other stuff as possible. The margins at grocery stores are razor thin so one impulse item makes a huge difference.

      As for the buffet - well, they do have free samples of stuff a lot of the time. That lady with the shower cap on and lots of food items with toothpicks in them.
    14. Re:Solution: Take a Cue from Vegas by Gryle · · Score: 1

      Being a cashier myself, Hell is more like having to work on Christmas Eve and the Friday after Thanksgiving. Were Dante's Inferno to be updated, working those days would be at least a third level torment.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
    15. Re:Solution: Take a Cue from Vegas by throbbingbrain.com · · Score: 1
      Basically you want to make it as hard as possible to leave the store with money. Hide the registers behind a wall of mirrors. Funnel the customer through a gauntlet of racks of impulse buy goods before the can get to the check out*. Put speed bumps on the floor. Offer free cocktails and a $5.99 prime rib buffet.
      Why does that remind me of trying to renew a domain at Godaddy.com?

    16. Re:Solution: Take a Cue from Vegas by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      I think the lack of windows and clocks is normal for almost every store. It is just cheaper to build a box without windows, cheaper to heat/cool, and there is one less way for people to break in or thing for vandals to trash. They probably figure everyone has a clock of some sort on them (phone, watch, etc) and they do have clocks in our local supermarket by the customer service area. I don't think it is a conspiracy.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    17. Re:Solution: Take a Cue from Vegas by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 1

      They already do that. That's why the milk is in the back of the store.

      --
      Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

      http://financialpetition.org/
    18. Re:Solution: Take a Cue from Vegas by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Or, you walk in to buy the stuff to make supper, and gee, there's meals to go, and do you really want to go to the effort of preparing, cooking, cleaning?

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    19. Re:Solution: Take a Cue from Vegas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nor is the milk being at the back of the store conspiracy. If you're buying a large quantity of items, you're generally going to start shopping near the entrance and work your way to the back. As a result, you'd rather buy the frozen/cold items last so they won't go without refrigeration for too long. Thus, the milk (and other frozen foods) are at the back, since that's likely the last area you visit before checking out.

  12. They are missing the human touch ... by Empty+Yo · · Score: 5, Funny

    The clerk in my grocery store remembered my name, twice, and flirted with me every time I went in. I took the plunge and asked her out and it turned into quite the summer romance while she was in town. Try that with some self-checkout and you'll be arrested within the minute.

    --
    I'll tolerate anything except intolerance.
    1. Re:They are missing the human touch ... by Arivia · · Score: 1

      John Updike fucking loves you.

      --
      The role of the writer is not to say what we can all say, but what we are unable to say. -Anais Nin
    2. Re:They are missing the human touch ... by mctk · · Score: 5, Funny

      This machine in my grocery never learned my name, but was always checking me out. It was always exceedingly patient; its politeness was automatic. It weighed a bit much but had a good interface. Our interactions were always intuitive and natural; I rarely pushed her buttons.

      One day, while buying an oversized cucumber, I realized it was flirting me the second time asked me to put the item in the bag. I took the plunge and tried to take it out, but the machine remained unmoved. When I inserted my membership card, she had an exception. Apparently I wasn't endowed with enough capital for her as I was denied and discarded.

      --
      Paul Grosfield - the quicker picker upper.
    3. Re:They are missing the human touch ... by oostevo · · Score: 1
      Weird. I was thinking nearly exactly the same thing while I read that post.

      I wonder how many other people will catch the A&P reference.

      --
      In soviet russia, You ask not what country do for you, but what you do for country!
      Oh wait...
    4. Re:They are missing the human touch ... by identity0 · · Score: 1

      Try to install embedded Linux on a clerk, and you'll be arrested before you can graft the ARM chip into her. Or so I've heard.

  13. boycott self check out. by Bobartig · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If I wanted to handle my own cart/checkout, I'd have bought it online. When I go to a grocery store or retail outlet, I always use a checkout clerk because the dozen or so times I used self check out, it didn't save me any time. Also, my grocery shopping consists of about 75% fruits and vegetables, and doing those on your own (numeric touch screen that doesn't always recognize the fruit code) definitely doesn't save you time.

    There was also a 6 month period where I went to Home depot about twice a week, and bought lumber every time (I was building a lot of stuff). Their self checkout system doesn't (or at least didn't) allow for construction materials purchases, so the self checkout was NEVER an option.

    I encourage others not to use self check outs, and spend a few extra minutes in line. That way, the big expensive machine that they replaced two humans with doesn't provide them any utility.

    --
    This is where I get my recommended daily allowance of "Foot in Mouth."
    1. Re:boycott self check out. by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      If you're buying *just* lumber (or at least mostly lumber). Go to the contractor's checkout if it's not busy. Those girls are fast and the doors are conveninent. If that's busy, go to the self-checkout and snag the girl that manages all four checkouts. She'll have to do everything (except process your payment), but you won't have to wait in line, because nobody uses those stupid things.

      Best of both worlds!

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    2. Re:boycott self check out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a little confused. You say you don't use self-checkout because you can't (because of lumber and veggies), but why do you recommend people boycott, if they can use it?

      This is confusing too:

      the dozen or so times I used self check out, it didn't save me any time.

      ..

      I encourage others not to use self check outs, and spend a few extra minutes in line.

      Will we spend a few extra minutes in line, or not? Have you made up your mind yet?

      And then there's this:

      I encourage others not to use self check outs .. . That way, the big expensive machine that they replaced two humans with doesn't provide them any utility.
      Huh?!! Machines replacing humans is a good thing, not a bad thing. I want to live in a Star Trek world where almost nobody has a job, because automation can handle everything and resources are no longer scarce and all the traditional economic models have had their premises violated. Who doesn't want a robot to take over their job? Please, replace us humans. Working as a grocery cashier probably isn't the worst job, but I bet I can think of a hundred more pleasant ones.
    3. Re:boycott self check out. by painQuin · · Score: 1

      the HD near me has begun issuing barcodes for cut lumber just like the deli section at the market. you just scan the piece of paper and you're set.

      --
      A guilty conscience means at least you've got one.
  14. cashiers are better by focitrixilous+P · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I have the unfortunate honor of working in a retail position to support my education. A Target namebadge in plain view from my desk at school serves as a very good reminder to stay focused.

    I never really saw the attraction of the self checkout as a serious shopper. When I went out for food with college buddies we'd all hit the self checkout if there was no line as a competition, too see who could avoid having the machine flip out at you for doing something wrong. Because we went so fast, we had to have an attendant come bail us out a couple times. Without fail, someone who had gone through a normal checkout was standing at the door waiting for us. I could probably do it now with my 1337 retail skills, but really the self checkout is a joke. It's boring conversation, and you have to bag your own stuff, just so some company makes an extra dime that you'll never see.

    Support college students. Go through a normal line.

    --
    SAILING MISHAP
    1. Re:cashiers are better by friedmud · · Score: 1

      Being employed at Target as you are... do you know if they have plans to use self-checkout?

      The Super Target just down the road has lately become my favorite place to shop (both for groceries and everything else)... it's clean and the people are friendly... and reading this just reminded me that I've never seen any Target store with self-checkout... but then I've never really had much of a wait at Target either (well... compared to most other stores) because they always seem to be well staffed... so maybe there's no need.

      Ah... one more thing Target did right is the credit card reading machine... the fact that it takes your card from you to read it is genious... let's me keep all the precious minutes of my life that would have been wasted by grandma _trying_ to swipe her card....

      Friedmud

    2. Re:cashiers are better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked for Target about two years & recently quit.

      Target will probably NEVER have self-checkout. They make too much money thru their credit cards to sacrifice an attempt to get you to sign up for one.

      And those credit card machines. . .half the time people insert them the wrong way, and they also freak out and ask "am I going to get it back?"

    3. Re:cashiers are better by David_W · · Score: 1
      And those credit card machines. . .half the time people insert them the wrong way

      I agree with the GP that those machines do seem superior, but I've always wondered why they couldn't find a way to let it read the stripe no matter which way you turn the card...

    4. Re:cashiers are better by jayloden · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I used to work as a cashier at a grocery store, and I've worked as a cashier in a department store as well. I'd like to think that I was a pretty good one (fast and efficient), too. Unfortunately, I can attest to the fact that this does not imbue one with any inherent speed at the self-checkout lane.

      It's a question of familiarity. When I was a cashier, by the end of the first day or two of training, I was pretty familiar with the setup; I was using it all day. You start scanning as fast as it will go, hitting the buttons, and looking ahead at what you're about to scan so you can be prepared for produce etc. Self-checkout, on the other hand, is a whole different ballgame.

      Every one of those self checkout lanes is a different setup, and I'm just not familiar with it. That means I have to take a few extra seconds to read the screen for each item, fight with the bagging scale, etc. Add that up over your typical checkout and it means it just takes longer than standing in line. *But* - and here's why these things are still successful at all - it's not the length of time it takes to get out of the store. It's the length of time it takes for something to start happening. I guarantee that if you had one person start self checkout immediately and another wait in line, even if the person who waited in line was done first, they'd feel like they were there longer. It's instant gratification, something is happening right away, regardless of whether it's more or less efficient.

    5. Re:cashiers are better by RyoShin · · Score: 1

      I prefer using the checkout lane whenever I have ~5 items. Most regular people are intimidated by doing all that themselves, and so will make longer lines at the regular checkouts, so it's much faster. If you're getting an entire month's supply of food, then you would want to stay away from the self-service lanes. But for a late night gallon of milk or grabbing some paper towels on your way home, self-checkouts are awesome.

    6. Re:cashiers are better by Nimey · · Score: 1

      You probably knew this, but the reason is cost. The cheaper the CC readers can be, the more they save when they buy ten thousand of them.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    7. Re:cashiers are better by sirambrose · · Score: 1

      They were actually made that way so that they can read the embedded chips on the older Target Visa cards and the amex blue card. A machine that could read smart cards inserted in both directions would probably be much more expensive than one that just reads the magnetic strip from both sides.

      I think that attempting to save money by making the readers only work in one direction is foolish because 25% of the people put their cards in backwards. Another 25% of people's cards are not read on the first try. To make matters worse, if you insert your credit card backwards it takes about 15 seconds to come back out as compared to 3 seconds if you put it in correctly. With all the other efforts that Target makes to speed up the check out process(such as allowing the customer to swipe the card and sign before the cashier finishes), this seems to be a silly way to ecconomize. If I didn't know otherwise, I would suggest that IBM doesn't know much about making cash registers.

    8. Re:cashiers are better by sirambrose · · Score: 1

      I doubt they will do it. Target is fairly big into credit cross promotion. While some grocery executives didn't realize that self check lanes would reduce impulse buys, I doubt the executives at Target are dumb enough to believe that a computer will convince many people to open or use a Target credit card. I also don't think that reducing cashiers would have a huge impact on payroll. A significant percentage of employees in the store work on the sales floor, the stock room, and on the overnight trailer unload and stocking team. Assuming they eliminated half of the cashiers, I would guess that store payroll would only be cut by about 10%. There are probably other ways to increase productivity 10% without buying so much expensive equipment. Target sells lots of stuff that would not work well with self check, including clothing, outdoor furniture, grills, and toys. Durring certain seasons we do significant business in these departments. I wouldn't want to be on duty for Black Friday if they ripped out half the registers in exchange for self check stations. In my store we run all 28 main registers on that day. If we could only use 14 on the busiest day of the year, it would be a disaster. In addition, Target believes strongly in limiting the length of lines at checkout. No line at Target is ever supposed to have more than 2 people. They can not fire most of the regular cashiers and force everyone into the self check without violating this standard and alienating their customers. The grocery stores can only do so becuase they have always had long lines at busy periods.

    9. Re:cashiers are better by focitrixilous+P · · Score: 1
      The reason you never wait too long is that people are called away from stocking shelves by the head cashier whenever the lines start to get long. Most people out on the floor will have walkie talkies, and will scurry up to the front to relieve the lines. The automated voice will slowly drive you insane though. Keep an ear out for "Additional Cashiers to the Front Lanes," you'll hear it a lot on busy weekends. That's why it can be hard to find staff to help you when it's busy, because most of the staff is up front as backup.

      As far as I know regular Targets have no plans to go to self checkout. Target shoots for being an "upscale" retail environment and self checkout doesn't really do that.

      I do like the auto credit card thing. Saves me some work of swiping stuff, which works about 95% of the time.

      One other really cool thing we've done lately at my Target is have long pieces of tape with the target logo printed on a strip of paper in the center. It's taped to large packages of toilet paper to avoid the need to use both hands to carry it without wasting a big bag just on that. Instant handle. Lots of people have commented what a good idea it is, even though it's very simple.

      --
      SAILING MISHAP
    10. Re:cashiers are better by friedmud · · Score: 1

      All of these comments from people on the inside of Target are confirming what I alreadys suspected: That I like to shop at Target.

      It just seems that every time I go in there I have a pleasant experience... and now I can see that it's not just happenstance. I'll probably shopping there even more now.

      Thanks!

      Friedmud

  15. Ever been in line when the monitor goes? by gettingbraver · · Score: 1

    The customer using the machine totatlly freaks!

  16. Your BLAME is Misplaced by DumbSwede · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually as a computer programmer I lay most of the blame on the bad design of the scanning systems. The scanner in one location the scale in another, often far flung, location, the credit card swipe in still another location, even down below eyesight. Worse yet as with many ATMs machines there are TOO MANY BUTTONS for what should be only ONE OPTION enter PIN and PAY! Not only are there too many buttons, but the onscreen instructions often are worded differently than the keys you have to press. "PRESS YES" out of the extra 10 buttons only an "OK" seems to map to "YES." It may seem obvious to you that OK is YES, but you have to read each key to eliminate the possibility that YES is an Option, this takes time, not just to read, but to double check you are doing it correctly. I don't know how many stores I have shopped at that put those kindergarten silver or gold stars by the keys, then verbally tell you to ignore the instructions and hit the "GOLD STAR". Often the screen will have option layout that would map to 4 function keys, but the keypad doesn't really have function keys in that location. Add to this that at auto-checkouts there's usually no one there to assist you, you usually have to figure this all out on your own. It is a money transaction, so if you are like me with an unfamiliar interface, you double, triple, quadruple check what you are doing.

    BUT worst of all, instead of one crappy layout system used by all stores, THEY ALL SUCK, BUT DIFFERENTLY. Name me one chain that has these machines well made? In time, someone will come up with a decent layout and everyone will adopt it and it will seem silly we had these problems but we're not there yet.

    HERE's an idea, put stick on scan labels by all the veggies so once bagged they can just be weighed and scanned instead of having to key in the code by HAND -- WTF???. Make the labels big with not just the code but large with print of what the veggie is so people aren't too tempted to cheat the system. A computer voice should also echo the entry (I believe most systems already do this).

    Many systems I have seen seem cobbled together from unrelated discrete components -- THIS WILL NOT DO.

    I WORK IN SQA AND I WOULD NEVER SIGN OFF ON THIS SHIT! Forgive my language, but its us, the IT professionals to blame here -- NOT EVERYDAY FOLK who

    1. Re:Your BLAME is Misplaced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Worse yet as with many ATMs machines...

      The proper phrase you're looking for is: automated ATM teller machines.

    2. Re:Your BLAME is Misplaced by Jonner · · Score: 1
      The proper phrase you're looking for is: automated ATM teller machines.

      The addition of "machine" after the acronym "ATM" is one of my pet peeves. Why does is it so inevitable? If people must add "machine," why not call them "AT machines"?
    3. Re:Your BLAME is Misplaced by vux984 · · Score: 1

      why not call them "AT machines"?

      1) Probably because nobody but you would have a clue what you were talking about.

      2) Also, maybe its just me, but if someone were to talk to me about an AT machine, I'd probably think of the ATs from IBM. (google "IBM AT")

    4. Re:Your BLAME is Misplaced by Jonner · · Score: 1

      Of course people wouldn't know what an "AT machine" is. I just don't understand what people are thinking when they say "ATM machine." Maybe I should start saying "Automated Teller Machine machine" to be extra clear.

    5. Re:Your BLAME is Misplaced by kt0157 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just another example of RAS Syndrome (RAS = Redundant Acronym Syndrome).

      K.

    6. Re:Your BLAME is Misplaced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, maybe its just me, but if someone were to talk to me about an AT machine, I'd probably think of the ATs from IBM. (google "IBM AT")

      Or an Imperial Walker. Oh, wait! Maybe they're the same thing?

    7. Re:Your BLAME is Misplaced by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the stupid ANZ atms that plagues Australia for years. For some stupid reason, the designer decided to add two decimal places to the withdrawal amount - even tho you can only withdraw amount in multiples of $20 notes. So everytime, I had to enter 00 - no, you couldn't just put in the dollars and press enter, that would have been simple - you have to enter in two zeros. If you enter in anything but 2 zeros, it gave an error. Brillant! Thanks a lot.

    8. Re:Your BLAME is Misplaced by Jonner · · Score: 1
      Just another example of RAS Syndrome (RAS = Redundant Acronym Syndrome).

      Laughing out LOL
    9. Re:Your BLAME is Misplaced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Don't forget to enter your Personal Identification Number number.

    10. Re:Your BLAME is Misplaced by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Parent makes a lot of sense here. I mostly see self-checkout at the grocery store, and unlike most of you who live on cheetos and Mountain Dew, I tend to buy at least some produce every time I shop. And the process for self-checking produce just sucks. Personally, I'd rather see more regular checkout lanes. I like to see other people with jobs, even if it costs me a few cents more each time I shop. And it gives me a chance to read the tabloids.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    11. Re:Your BLAME is Misplaced by indifferent+children · · Score: 1

      You're lucky that the machine wasn't capable of dispensing $2, or you would have had a $1.50 service charge, and $2 in your hand.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    12. Re:Your BLAME is Misplaced by polyex · · Score: 1

      Blame the Point of Sale systems too. This is where a real problem lies with Self-Checkout and the POS screen scraping it must do in most cases.

    13. Re:Your BLAME is Misplaced by Mikkeles · · Score: 1

      I don't know about your neck of the woods, but here (Canada) many ATMs will accept payment for bills and allow transfer of funds which are often not integral multiples of dollars. However, a good UI would realise that a withdrawal does not require this amount of discrimination and reset it to 00.

      --
      Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
    14. Re:Your BLAME is Misplaced by Jerf · · Score: 1

      Name me one chain that has these machines well made?

      I've been reasonably pleased with the ones at Meijer. The only thing that seems to really trip people up routinely is the fact that the place where you put the groceries is also a scale, and you need to not put stuff in your cart or let your kid lean up against that area. Most of the problems I see seem to be genuine customer stupidity, and you get that in normal checkout lines too. They've even done some light enforcement of the item limit; they claim that some people were damaging the scales by putting too much weight on it, and while I don't know if that's true, it's believable.

      Most people use them for groceries, which have much better weight characteristics than the Home Depot loads people have been complaining about. (A more even distribution of weight, instead of something massive followed by a single, solitary washer.)

      The second generation is actually a little fruitier, but I'm still hoping it'll be OK.

      Oh, Meijer has a cashier for each set of 4 auto-checkouts. This can't hurt any. And their training seems to actually be pretty good, to my surprise; they seem to know what they are doing.

      I'm not convinced you can have a fully automated checkout line; you need some humans to deal with things like no barcodes, and to explain to people how to handle exceptional cases like produce.

    15. Re:Your BLAME is Misplaced by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      I have a suspicion that the software that runs the displays is built seperately from the company that makes the hardware. So the company that builds the self-checkout system buys the software, then buys the ATM controler, then buys all the other pieces and puts them together. That the pieces clash with each other ("OK" instead of "YES") is probably a result of the system builder not being careful or buying parts based on price only.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    16. Re:Your BLAME is Misplaced by Greatmoose · · Score: 0

      I'll probably get flamed for this, but out of all the stores in my city that have self-checkout, WALMART has the best system, surprisingly enough. They're fast (they stop talking to you after you scan the first item), they're generally reliable, and most importantly, you can actually remove items from the scales after they've been scanned and weighed, and it won't freak out. And in our walamrts, there is one cashier for every 4 self-checkout machines. Just a bit of anecdotal evidence.

      --
      Clearly I forgot to equip my +5 Codpiece of Karma.
    17. Re:Your BLAME is Misplaced by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      I simply recast it in my head to A...T...Mmm mmachine. They just pronounce it funny. Same thing for PIN number. I need to do everything I can to make other people less irritating.

      Too bad the trick never worked for "The La Brea Tar Pits."

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    18. Re:Your BLAME is Misplaced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      ATMs can be more fun in foreign countries. try Finland where if you get a Finnish atm card you can't get English menus. But if you stick in any foreign card, you can get English menus (i.e. the machines speak English, but they're especially told *not* to speak English to card carriers of Finnish banks). Talk to the credit companies and they'll gladly offer to:

      1. Switch your card from Finnish to Swedish
      2. Switch your card from Swedish to Finnish
      3. Switch your card that you switched from Finnish to Swedish back to Finnish

      Yes, I've really called. They're fairly apologetic, but that's all they can do.

      Of course, if you take your card to the rest of Europe, the ATMs there will gladly offer you English (and 3 other languages).

    19. Re:Your BLAME is Misplaced by Politburo · · Score: 1

      HERE's an idea, put stick on scan labels by all the veggies so once bagged they can just be weighed and scanned instead of having to key in the code by HAND

      Some Wegmans stores have this setup. IMO, it's easier the "low tech" way. Working the scale is just as annoying as working the self-checkout line. And if your produce isn't in the list of codes (might be a special or something), forget about it.

    20. Re:Your BLAME is Misplaced by AceyMan · · Score: 1

      Dumbswede wrote..."those kindergarten silver or gold stars"

      I'll have you know, since 2001, at my firm we get those stars in lieu of stock options, you insensitive clod :)

      --
      -- Experience is a wonderful thing. It enables you to recognize a mistake when you make it again.
    21. Re:Your BLAME is Misplaced by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Worse yet as with many ATMs machines

      Goddamn fucking shit those things piss me off. Not the ATMs that spit out money, the "self-swipe" at the checkout. It asks "credit or debit?" and you press credit. THEN THE GOD DAMNED PIECE OF SHIT ASKS FOR A FUCKING PIN NUMBER! wtf???

      If you program these shitty things, I hate your fucking guts! When did they start hiring stupid fucking morons to do engineering, anyway?

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    22. Re:Your BLAME is Misplaced by mjwx · · Score: 0

      "The proper phrase you're looking for is: automated ATM teller machines."

      Ah yes, the "automated Automatic Teller Machine teller machines". Right, your making a lot of sense now.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    23. Re:Your BLAME is Misplaced by Jonner · · Score: 1

      That's a good idea. So you could just ask someone for his "PInumber." if you want to rob him blind.

  17. Offtopic - Gosh Thanks Oregon! by DavidRawling · · Score: 1

    <rant>Hmph - at least you CAN pump gas. I'm on a business trip in Portland, OR (I'm an Australian native) and I was told today that "You can't pump your own gas in Oregon it's illegal". Say WHAT?!

    So instead I have to wait for the SINGLE GUY looking after 8 pumps to get back to me, and having asked first time for a full tank and second time for "fill it up as much as you can" I get about 15 gal in the 18 gal tank. Yeah that will sure make it easier for me. NOT!</rant>

    This is one case where self service is far easier and definitely preferred, (but I agree about the Marketing Dweebs).

  18. The technology needs refinement by Krolley · · Score: 1

    Traditionally we think of computers as things that are meant to make our lives easier and faster, giving us more time to do the things we really want to do (which for most of us is playing with computers!) In this case it appears that computers are benefitting us as consumers to the detriment of the company that has implemented the technology. How long will it be before this new 'technology' is only employed to give the illusion of efficiency, but in reality will keep us hovering around those impulse items for far longer than we should?

    Grab your tinfoil hats, people, here it comes. Shopping habits of consumers could be analysed to determine who is more likely to impulse spend, and these consumers could be held at the checkout longer while the computer 'processes' the items that they wish to purchase. However, I suppose that when that becomes feasible, RFID chips will intercept our thoughts and send them to McDonalds anyway.

    --
    "Dewey, you fool: Your decimal system has played right into my hands!"
    1. Re:The technology needs refinement by DarkDragonVKQ · · Score: 1

      That's already happened..at least I think. If you use a credit card or even debit card you don't think the major companies (Visa, American Express, Discover, etc..) don't know what your buying?

      --
      "I thought what I'd do was I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes" ~ Laughing Man - GITS:SAC
  19. RFID by Ethan+Allison · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Why not use those 5 cent RFID tags? Place your shopping cart in the scanner and hit a button. "But what about produce?" you ask? Well, how about RFID-enabled bags with specific tags for each kind of produce? Sure, it's not perfect, but it could be refined. Plus people could return the tags for store credit, and information embedded in the tags could be used to manage inventory and tell robotic machinery how to bag and/or stock the items. Also, if you steal my idea, I will hunt you down.

    1. Re:RFID by PygmySurfer · · Score: 1

      and information embedded in the tags could be used to manage inventory and tell robotic machinery how to bag and/or stock the items

      and track your purchases and compare them against your tv viewing habits and movie rentals and when they determine you were shopping at Target instead of Wal-mart the checkout machine will have an "accident" and you'll never walk again.

  20. self-checkout is fine by me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    There are a lot of comments "proving" that self-checkout is a waste of time. I have to disagree, at least for me. My method is to cruise by, see if theres a self-checkout already open and hit it. If not, I'll go stand in line (if it's reasonable). I generally fly through the self-checkout with no problems. Then again, I don't buy a ton of produce or anything that requires anything other than the old barcode. I have maybe one problem every 100 checkouts this way. What does this prove? Self-checkout is great for ME. Maybe not for everyone, but definitely for me.

    Plus I prefer buying the 36 pack of condoms (cheaper per condom and avoids me having to buy them as often) at the self-checkout, especially when combined with some other random purchase like peanut butter.

    1. Re:self-checkout is fine by me by friedmud · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm with you... I hardly ever have problems as well.

      Like I said in an earlier post... people just need to realize when and when not to use self-checkout. When buying produce I almost always realize this and stand in line. But, that's the odd occasion, I'm almost always just picking up that _one_ item my wife forgot... and for that self-checkout is a life-saver.

      Also... you are spot on about the condoms. I can remember being a teenager when self-checkout first came to our Wal-Mart (we were one of the first to trial it)... I thought that God himself had answered my prayers with a discrete way to purchase personal items... to this day I still use self-checkout for those purposes (only now I'm usually buying feminine products in _HUGE_ quantities instead ;-)

      I think it's interesting that so many geeks don't like self-checkout. With our leet computer skills you would think that we would be drawn to it like moths to a flame... but that doesn't appear to be the case.

      Friedmud

    2. Re:self-checkout is fine by me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, the "Slashdot Liftime Supply" size, eh?

    3. Re:self-checkout is fine by me by kbielefe · · Score: 1
      a discrete way to purchase personal items
      Ahh... the good old days, when I had to go without shaving and deoderant for a few days so the cashier would believe I was old enough to buy them.
      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    4. Re:self-checkout is fine by me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think it's interesting that so many geeks don't like self-checkout. With our leet computer skills you would think that we would be drawn to it like moths to a flame... but that doesn't appear to be the case.
      That's because self checkout requires physical activity.
    5. Re:self-checkout is fine by me by atomic_toaster · · Score: 1

      I can remember being a teenager when self-checkout first came to our Wal-Mart (we were one of the first to trial it)... I thought that God himself had answered my prayers with a discrete way to purchase personal items...

      Things to put beside/near the self-check aisles:

      - prune juice
      - Anusol
      - adult diapers
      - feminine hygiene products
      - condoms
      - lube
      - etc...

      Actually, wouldn't it make sense for drugstores/pharmacies to have a lot of self-checkout lanes? That's one of the few places that people (especially teens, I'd bet) would actually pay a little more to avoid having to deal with human cashiers. It would help if the only people supervising the self-checkouts were senior, discreet men and women (how many times has the cashier been cute when you were buying something embarrassing?). Of course, they'd have to turn the voices down on the machines, or change what they say. At least a human being has the option not to say "X-brand lube, $X.XX"...

    6. Re:self-checkout is fine by me by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      people just need to realize when and when not to use self-checkout.

      When to use self-checkout: when you're a fucking moron.

      When not to: When you have a 3 digit IQ.

      Easy.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    7. Re:self-checkout is fine by me by friedmud · · Score: 1

      Thank you for the enlightening comment! I appreciate your novel additions to this conversation!

      I actually believe it to be the other way around... smart people can both figure how to use self-checkout efficiently and when to use it (which for me is usually when I only have a couple of things and there is no one else there).

      "Fucking morons," as you put, it would be someone who would stand in line with one thing to buy while the self-checkout sits empty...

      Friedmud

  21. RFID (forgot to go to plaintext before) by Ethan+Allison · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why not use those 5 cent RFID tags?

    Place your shopping cart in the scanner and hit a button.

    "But what about produce?" you ask? Well, how about RFID-enabled bags with specific tags for each kind of produce?

    Sure, it's not perfect, but it could be refined.

    Plus people could return the tags for store credit, and information embedded in the tags could be used to manage inventory and tell robotic machinery how to bag and/or stock the items.

    Also, if you steal my idea, I will hunt you down.

    1. Re:RFID (forgot to go to plaintext before) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our local public library (Brighton, UK - http://www.citylibraries.info/libraries/jubilee.as p) uses the RFID approach with books - to self-checkout, you swipe your library card, put your big pile of books on the desk (all at the once if you like, it doesn't matter). The list of books comes up on the screen and you're done. Returning them is easy - pile your returns on the same desk, the books come up on the screen and you can then drop 'em in the bin next to the desk.

      Self-checkout done the right way, and finally a worthwhile use for RFID tags....

    2. Re:RFID (forgot to go to plaintext before) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Also, if you steal my idea, I will hunt you down.


      Eh, that's not your idea: http://www.google.com/search?q=rfid+checkout
    3. Re:RFID (forgot to go to plaintext before) by ZorbaTHut · · Score: 1

      There's still issues with reliability and accuracy. That said, there's a lot of research going on in this department, and this is getting closer.

      Don't expect it by tomorrow, but it wouldn't surprise me if this is getting increasingly common in a few years.

      --
      Breaking Into the Industry - A development log about starting a game studio.
  22. Up-Sell X80 Autmoted Checking Machine by walnutmon · · Score: 5, Funny

    X80: "Good Day Sir, Please Scan First Item"
    Consumer: (Scans taco mix)
    X80: "Ah, Taco Mix, very nice, I noticed that you seem to have chosen the generic taco mix, are you sure you have thought this through?"
    C: (Selects "yes")
    X80: "Have you given much thought to the consequences involved in buying generic taco mix? What will your children say?"
    C: (Selects "I don't have any children")
    X80: "Ah, I see, single guy, living it up, not too concerned about the quality of your taco mix. Are you in a relationship?"
    C: (Selects "Not really, Girls don't like me very much")
    X80: "I am sorry to hear that sir, it probably makes you feel pretty bad at night, trouble sleeping?"
    C: (Selects "Yeah, some times my mind wanders at night")
    X80: "How about some tylenol PM? Also, I would like to recommend this issue of Maxim, it has some great advice on picking up women in the clubs, and also some great pictures to jack off to, you know, if things are a bit slow to start"
    C: (Selects "OK")
    X80: "Great Sir! I'd say this is probably working out to be one of the better shopping experiences you have had recently. Not going to want to make a mess out of that magazine though.... Tisues?"
    C: (Selects "Absolutely! I want the ones with lotion.") (Then mumbles to himself) "This thing is great, so much less embarrasing than dealing with those pretty young checkout ladies."
    X80: "Your additional Items will be here in one moment"
    Beautiful Checkout Assistant: "Hi... uh... this is your girly mag, and tissues for masturbation sir... and here is the tylenol... so your depressed ass can get to sleep at night... you are a pretty sick person, you know that?"
    C: "..."
    X80: "Women can be pretty damn cruel, don't you think sir? How about a rope?"
    C: (Selects "no thanks, get me out of here")

    --
    You take it, I don't want it...
    1. Re:Up-Sell X80 Autmoted Checking Machine by Suzuran · · Score: 1

      I honestly believe this is the first time ever that I have wished for mod points.

    2. Re:Up-Sell X80 Autmoted Checking Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bwaaaaaaahahahahahaha!!! My stomac!

    3. Re:Up-Sell X80 Autmoted Checking Machine by glsunder · · Score: 1

      (09:34:40) Wife: X80: "Great Sir! I'd say this is probably working out to be one of the better shopping experiences you have had recently. Not going to want to make a mess out of that magazine though.... Tisues?"

      C: (Selects "Absolutely! I want the ones with lotion."
      (09:35:00) Wife: LOL, apparently we are not the only ones to notice that lotion kleenex is better on semen
      (09:35:54) Me: i should post that to /.
      (09:36:09) Wife: that was posted on /.
      (09:36:18) Me: our im conversation
      (09:36:23) Wife: lol

    4. Re:Up-Sell X80 Autmoted Checking Machine by ddddan · · Score: 1

      Is there a +1 tragicomic rating?

    5. Re:Up-Sell X80 Autmoted Checking Machine by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Sadly, behind every joke there is an ounce of truth. I'll pray for you my monkey spanking son.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  23. Are you kidding me? by CtrlPhreak · · Score: 1

    Every time I go to do self checkout I must be behind the idiot who can't check himself/herself out! This means I actually spend my time in line making fun of the products they're trying to get me to impulse buy, especially at walmart (they shove a ton of 'as seen on tv' crap right there). When I have time to consider the pros and cons of a product and research the alternatives in all the various magazines on display there, it's no longer an impulse.

    Plus when there's a human at the scanner all day they know exactly when it gets dirty and clean it right then, keeps people from doing the 'I don't understand why it won't scan through this dried on milk' thing. I used to be a cashier, just taught me how stupid humanity is.

    //how can an old lady lift a box of dried milk into her cart in the store and onto the conveyer, but not lift it off the cashier station when she's bought it?

    --
    WikiAfterDark.com It's a sex wiki, go now!
    1. Re:Are you kidding me? by horseshoe · · Score: 1

      Rarely used muscle group. Hold your arms out at 90 degrees to get over the check signing table, palms down, and see how much you can lift. Then try it when you are 70+ years old.

    2. Re:Are you kidding me? by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      "I actually spend my time in line making fun of the products they're trying to get me to impulse buy"

      Like how every woman's magazine will have one title on the cover on how to lose weight followed by a recipe for "make this incredible chocolate cake!"? They do this EVERY time.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  24. Um... by Rie+Beam · · Score: 1

    Working in a grocery store, I thought of an idea that would possibly drive up little purchases like this: advertisements on the monitors, perhaps with arrows point to the merchandise while advertising the sale price (if any). Perhaps if you spend more than a certain amount, an ad offering a special price comes up before you pay...something like that. I know the last thing some of you want is more advertising in a grocery store, but you're already submerged and bombarded enough as-is inside of them ... a quick flick of the wrist and press of the "No Thanks" button will become automatic.

    1. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is already being done at Zehrs grocery stores all throughout Canada.

  25. And lest I forget... by Simonetta · · Score: 1

    I almost forgot,

        I'm the one who buys the day-old 'red-band' bananas and find that the automatic cashier hasn't been updated with today's 'red-band' price. So I insist that the cashier at the auto checkout stand leave the station, walk back a half-kilometer to the produce section, and verify that the price of the day is two pennies less than the machine says that it is.
        And as soon as the auto-checkout attendent cashier begins their merry journey, your machine has locked up because it is demanding that you show your driver's license to the cashier in order to buy a beer.

        Now ain't that just the worst of them all?

    1. Re:And lest I forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As unnerving that is for other people waiting in line (and for myself when other people do it), I always insist on the correct price. I made the decision to buy the item based on the price that was on display in the store. It is not my fault that they can't keep their checkout system up to date with the correct prices. I don't make $1.99 two dollars "because it's just 1 cent" either. If the store thinks they can trick my price intuition, they will have to pay someone to give me one cent. Oh, and I pay cash.

    2. Re:And lest I forget... by jrumney · · Score: 1

      I usually sort it out at the customer services desk later. That way the queue behind me doesn't get held up through no fault of their own.

    3. Re:And lest I forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That way you have to wait once more and you lose some of the impact. The store is less pressed to change things and other customers are not alerted to the fuzzy checkout practices. Besides, I lied. I don't make a fuss over a couple of cents every time it happens, only when it has happened to me more than once at the same store.

  26. "Item Removed From Bagging Area" by alphasubzero949 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I absolutely detest self-checkout machines for many of the reasons already discussed here, but my biggest pet peeve happens when you run out of room in the bagging area. If you dare remove something the machine will throw a fit until it is put back. If you barely scoot your already scanned items over, the machine will think that something was pulled out and will nag you.

    And how is fighting with these machines like this supposed to save time?

    1. Re:"Item Removed From Bagging Area" by qsqueeq · · Score: 1

      I really wish more dumb people like this would stop using the self checkout. It's not rocket science. I hate waiting for the moron who can't figure out...
      1. Scan Item.
      2. Place Item in bag.
      3. Repeat.

      Man that's hard. Sam

  27. Self checkout = shorter line waits? Not likely by SmokeSerpent · · Score: 1

    Self checkout lines are never any faster than regular checkout lanes.

    Of the 5 times I have tried to use self checkout, I made it through without needing assistance exactly zero times. Items won't scan, the item doesn't come up in the database, the sensor won't recognize that you've put it in the bag, the touch screen is so far out of alignment that the bottom buttons won't work, the money thing won't read a nearly perfect bill. There's so much that can go wrong or not meet the system's expectations that this is possibly the worst application for self-service technology one could imagine.

    Yeah it only takes one checker to manage 4 stations, but in the same time he or she has managed to get one person through each station, he or she could have checked all four through a traditional register setup.

    --
    All kings is mostly rapscallions. -Mark Twain, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
    1. Re:Self checkout = shorter line waits? Not likely by umghhh · · Score: 1

      but the senseros cleaning person is not as expensive as a person that has to handle money. It is then better to waste your time than invest. Unless it hurts profits it will stay.

      The question is however whether it is only impulse that is badly affected. It may be that some customers go some other place because they prefer fast and efficient human service and some other customers (buying one pack of condoms etc) come. Whether the chain will see profits decrease or increase is a bit complicated matter especially as the technology is rather not that advanced yet (to say the least).

      of course the best solution to all the problems surrounding new technology would be if we stopped purchasing items difficult to control in these machines. In time we may move into simple artificailly made foods that have neither real nutritional nor taste value and this problem ceases to exist.
      heck some of us are already there!

  28. Did we lose a war? by bit+trollent · · Score: 4, Funny

    Am I the only one who still wonders to himself, "How the hell did this happen to us?" as I scan and bag my own groceries. I mean, I really feel like someone got the uperhand on me.

    If we ever conquer Iraq, I hope someone puts self checkout lines in their supermarkets. Then they will know what slavery really is.

  29. PLEASE SEE EMPLOYEE FOR ASSITANCE by Ponzicar · · Score: 2, Funny

    I scan an item and put it on the scale; PLEASE REMOVE OBJECT FROM THE COUNTER. I take it off; PLEASE RETURN ITEM TO THE COUNTER. BEEP BEEP BEEP PLEASE REMOVE ITEM FROM THE COUNTER. I then walk to the normal line and get checked out while the machine is still throwing a temper tantrum from my anomalously weighted loaf of bread.

  30. I hate self checkout lines by CTalkobt · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If they'd lower the prices of my groceries I'd go through the lines but since they don't / won't - I won't.

    The more efficiencies that you put in the market the less you cycle the money: IE: Spend $100 paying an individual. That person will then spend $50 of that $100 on something. The 3rd person will then spend $5 of that $50 spending something. Fourth person spending $1 - total money in circulation for spending money is $156.

    In real life the multipliers for money are much higher (8x I think). The more you cut individuals at low-end jobs the more you decrease the overall US economy, or at least drive the profits into the higher income segment.

    Again, lower the price to get me to go through the lines. I shouldn't have to do the grocery store's work for them.

    --
    There's a gorilla from Manilla whose a fella that stinks of vanilla and has salmonella.
    1. Re:I hate self checkout lines by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Spend $100 paying an individual. That person will then spend $50 of that $100 on something. The 3rd person will then spend $5 of that $50 spending something. Fourth person spending $1 - total money in circulation for spending money is $156.

      See? It's things like this that made me get a C in economics. Where the hell do they come up with this stuff?

    2. Re:I hate self checkout lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      *sigh*

      All money inflows and outflows must balance at the end of the fiscal period.
      There is no money flowing into oblivion as your analysis would suggest. Increased efficiency is better for the economy as a whole regardless of initial distribution. In the long run, the decreased costs from increased efficiency will be passed on to the consumer when companies are forced to compete for business. Also, some people may lose their jobs to these machines, but that does not mean suddenly all that money has gone away.
      For the time being, it travels into the company as profits. (See previous note about eventual passing on of savings to consumer.) What is this company going to do with this money you ask?
      • Hire more R&D people to create newer technologies further increasing efficiency
      • Pay out more dividends
      • Open new stores (and thus hire more people again)
      • Expand/Renovate existing stores (employing new labor in form of construction and additional store personnel)
      • Bonuses to big wigs *gasp* *shock* *horror* - Okay... so then they either invest in stocks, deposit in banks, or buy something... all of which put the money back into circulation

      Anyways.. the point is that money never disappears as a result of a transaction. Every person's and every business's balance sheet has to balance at the end of the day. It's just that simple. You can not spend what you do not have. And you can not use the money you made unless you give it to someone else (Note: burning your money doesn't usually provide good results, though you are helping to reduce inflation).
    3. Re:I hate self checkout lines by Sloppy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      By that reasoning, what the economy really needs is more terrorism, war, and natural disasters. What a boon it must be to the economy, for a destructive hurricane to wreck a city and create a bunch of contracting jobs. If only someone would press the big red button and launch all the world's nuclear missiles -- it would circulate so much money that poverty would be virtually eliminated.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    4. Re:I hate self checkout lines by CTalkobt · · Score: 1

      Actually, it was briefly discussed after Katrina but cities after a natural disaster typically tend to rebuild to a much larger economic base than they had 10 years after the event happens.

      However, although the news-folks were discussing the floods et al I'm not sure it would apply for a disaster of that scale when base infrastructure is severly affected.

      However, mass damage that doesn't impact the overall infrastructure can be a good thing as it provides jobs, ability to implement things "right" - you get a fresh start to straighten out Lombard street for example and it provides for an influx of workers and with them an economic boom.

      --
      There's a gorilla from Manilla whose a fella that stinks of vanilla and has salmonella.
    5. Re:I hate self checkout lines by evilquaker · · Score: 2, Insightful
      By that reasoning, what the economy really needs is more terrorism, war, and natural disasters. What a boon it must be to the economy, for a destructive hurricane to wreck a city and create a bunch of contracting jobs.

      I know you're trying to be clever, but your argument is indeed correct. In general, natural disasters are net positive for the economy, as the temporary loss of economic activity is offset by the future rebuilding and enhanced productivity. War (that doesn't happen on your soil) is similar. The largest YoY % changes in US GDP in the 20th century happened in the early 40's, as WWII helped pull the US out of the Great Depression.

      --
      To within half a percent, pi seconds is a nanocentury. -- Tom Duff
    6. Re:I hate self checkout lines by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

      Yes, disasters create a lot of jobs, but you are overlooking the negative causes of all the damage cost in lost property and materials. At the end of the day, you'll have spent a lot of money to get back to where you were before the storm; if not for the storm, you'd have what you starting with and then some. That's what the parable of the broken window is about.

    7. Re:I hate self checkout lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I used to work for the financial industry too. But, unlike how you sound, I found a good street surgeon to have the brain-washing chip removed. In reality that "banks make money" thing is a myth. PEOPLE make money, which the banks harvest. Also, people do not recieve $100 and only spend $50 of it. People either spend 100% of what they get or else put it away for later with the intention of spending 100% of it later. There is no such thing as unspendable money. That's why it's called 'money'.

    8. Re:I hate self checkout lines by Eric+Sharkey · · Score: 2, Informative

      In general, natural disasters are net positive for the economy

      It scares me that people out there actually think like this.

      This line of thinking is discussed in The Parable of the Broken Window and is easily dismissed as bunk in any serious analysis.

    9. Re:I hate self checkout lines by mopslik · · Score: 1
      In general, natural disasters are net positive for the economy, as the temporary loss of economic activity is offset by the future rebuilding and enhanced productivity.

      Isn't this just an example of the broken window fallacy? I mean, sure there are jobs created, but you've lost the value of what needs to be rebuilt.

      Just curious.

    10. Re:I hate self checkout lines by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

      The more efficiencies that you put in the market the less you cycle the money

      Taking that to an ad absurdum point would imply that we'd be best off with everyone being a middleman. Clearly, that's not the case.

      Productivity gains allow for resources to be freed for other purposes. The person saving $50 per month because of efficiencies at the grocery store can now get a massage at their local massotherapist. For the money multiplier to go down when efficiencies become greater would require the assumption that the checkout person can't work another job (which is not necessarily right or wrong--the change from an industrial economy to a service based one has been very ugly for some people.)

    11. Re:I hate self checkout lines by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah, that was sortof my whole point. Destruction is destruction, period. The very idea that inefficiency and destruction are somehow beneficial, is so ludicrous that it amazes me that anyone thinks that way. But they do... wow!

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    12. Re:I hate self checkout lines by kthejoker · · Score: 1

      Uhh, trickle-down economics was shot down in 1986. That's why Reagan had to repeal all his tax cuts and ride the deficit train. Fast forward 20 years, and we're doing the same thing (except we're not repealing the tax cuts, so our deficits are even higher.)

      Look, the real frank truth is that profit margins in America are higher than they've ever been, and CEO pay is higher than it's ever been, and operating expenses above mid-level management are higher than they've ever been. There is more money at the top than ever, and it is not showing up in the local economy. Period. The real problem is that a lack of moral calculus and the lack of a perceived "greed ceiling" (the point at which an individual decides they have made enough money and can afford to make less money) has made it hard for average Americans to get involved in the wealth creation system our founding fathers set up so long ago.

      Benefits, health care, retirement - all used to be corporate guarantees, but no more. Companies offer no loyalty to the employees at the bottom any more. It's a regressive system, and it is being increasingly subsidized by the mysterious money pit that is the American federal deficit. Eventually that bubble will burst, and when it does, it will get very, very brutal here. That "greed ceiling" will come crashing down harder than ever, and everybody will suffer. That's the price of only viewing things in the short run (as your comical "big wig bonuses = increased consumer spending" laissez-faire econ 101 theory espouts.)

    13. Re:I hate self checkout lines by evilquaker · · Score: 1
      This line of thinking is discussed in The Parable of the Broken Window and is easily dismissed as bunk in any serious analysis.

      I suppose if your idea of "serious analysis" is a lot of handwaving about "coulds" and "shoulds" and ridiculous assumptions, then you can easily dismiss it...

      As I see it, the broken window "fallacy" has three serious flaws. First, it assumes that investment is a zero-sum game: that money spent on A will not be spent on B. This is of course not true, as it's possible to borrow money so as to invest in both A and B. Any businessman worth a damn will borrow to fund a worthwhile project before he'd kill it for lack of funding. There is some cost to this borrowing, but it's far less than the opportunity cost of not funding a project.

      Second, it assumes that investment is done optimally and efficiently. Anyone familiar with government will tell you this isn't true. Any decrease in the amount spent on B needs to be measured in terms of its marginal impact; it's not enough to say "I decreased spending on B by $x and increased spending on A by $x and therefore it balances out." For example, take the case of the US workforce during WWII. Since the men were off fighting the war, women had to go to work. The marginal impact of the war on employment back home is far less than the Austrians would admit, because of the inefficiently used workforce. Necessity may be the mother of invention, but she's also the mother of getting stuff done efficiently.

      But the main problem is that the Austrians fail to account for hidden benefits. For example, while many women returned to the home after WWII ended, there is no doubt that the WWII experience helped increase the number of women in the workforce. Thus, WWII directly aided productivity for years to come. Or consider the improvments in window energy efficiency over the last twenty years. The decrease in heating and cooling bills that the shopkeeper would see due to more efficient windows is completely ignored by the Austrians, who think that windows are all the same.

      So I suppose if simpleminded analysis is good enough for you, then go ahead and dismiss it.

      --
      To within half a percent, pi seconds is a nanocentury. -- Tom Duff
    14. Re:I hate self checkout lines by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

      People have to be paid to design, install, and maintain these systems.

      Also, with the increased savings, the retail outlet will have higher margins and thus able to compete better in the marketplace. This means prices will eventually go down costing consumers less.

      --
      Libertas in infinitum
    15. Re:I hate self checkout lines by Myopic · · Score: 1

      I see you, too, have read "1984". In it, Orwell explains that one purpose of continuous warfare was to drive the economy.

  31. They don't mention by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All types of random currency the self-check out machines end up with. Pro-tip: 1 yen coins work as pennies in the wal-mart check out line!

    1. Re:They don't mention by janzen · · Score: 1

      Ok, it's modded Funny, but you do realize that 1 yen is about 1.17 US cents, right? Are you trying to leave the machine a tip?

    2. Re:They don't mention by joe_adk · · Score: 1

      Actually 1 yen is about .85 cents
      So, if you can manage to pay all in 1 yen coins, you can save 15 percent. Numerator, denominator... whats the difference?

    3. Re:They don't mention by janzen · · Score: 1

      Oops, you're right. Clearly my caffeine level is dangerously low today...

    4. Re:They don't mention by bshroyer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Pro-tip: 1 yen coins work as pennies in the wal-mart check out line!

      That's one of the more absurd tips I've ever heard.

      At the current spot exchange rate, 116 yen per USD, I stand to save a MAXIMUM of 14% (1/1.16) by using Yen coins in place of pennies.

      Not to mention the fact that, for purchases larger than, say, a pack of gum, the opportunity cost of time spent on line feeding coins into the slot quickly eats up any gains I may have enjoyed in the transaction.

      Here's a better tip:

      The 1AED coin (United Arab Emirates) is exactly the same size as the US quarter dollar. However, it's worth 10% more than the US quarter, so this trick only works in automated grocers in Dubai. Good luck!

      --
      The cure for cancer is coming: Reovirus
  32. losing money, making money, losing business? by SpectralDesign · · Score: 1

    If the grocer is losing money from impulse purchases (oh boy, $0.10 profit from that pack of gum) they're making it back in reduced labor & overhead... I don't have solid figures, but even a minimum-wager with no benefits has a higher overhead than an autonomous system with a low maintainance requirement.... certainly enough to offset that $0.10 profit per customer....

    But regarding self-checkout: the systems I've used are all a major pain in the arse; the only time I'll use them is if I have very few items to purchase, the self-checkout lines are clear, and the regular checkout lines are overflowing. Why?.... self-checkout systems are uusually crap, with terrible user-interfaes, buggy scales that constantly put you into "wait for assistance" mode because they think you're trying to steal something, staffed by a single "associate" who is busy talking to a co-worker or otherwise unattentive to your self-checkout system being in locak-down mode... I could go on, but basically until they rqadivally improve the efficiency of self-checkout I generally avoid it.

    (and I don't impulse-buy in the regular checkout lines... the only thing I'll grab there are batteries or phone-cards that I actually need.)

    --
    Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind. - Dr. Seuss
    1. Re:losing money, making money, losing business? by Splab · · Score: 1

      That would only hold true if the system worked flawlessly and customers could work it at speed, but looking at other posts here it would seem to be the contrary, in fact some mentions that some of the systems need manager intervention, so in stead of cheap labor at the registers, you now need a manager...

    2. Re:losing money, making money, losing business? by SpectralDesign · · Score: 1

      I don't see how customers "working it at speed" matters -- they store isn't paying them. Also, the associate attending to the self-checkout lines (where I've seen them) is attending to 4, 6, 8, or more systems. On the rare occasion that a manager must intercede -- well, the manager is on duty anyway, and is likely making salary, not wage, so it doesn't really cost the store anything in that case, does it? I've never seen an incident that required manager intervention where I've seen these self-checkout lines. If the systems weren't clunky and unintuitive (and constantly going into "wait for assistance" mode) perhaps some customers could work them "at speed" too.

      --
      Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind. - Dr. Seuss
    3. Re:losing money, making money, losing business? by embracethenerdwithin · · Score: 1

      At the store I worked at we had 4 self checkouts. Each regular register had 1 cashier and 1 bagger making about 6.50 per hour. The self checkout had one person watching it. So right there it's 7 less people you have to employ.

      Which saves about 45.50 an hour. Our self checkouts were open from 7am - 11pm, which is 16 hours a day. 45.50 * 16 = $728 a day. 728 * 363(not open easter or Christmas) = $264,264 a year. Of course you have to take out to cover the service costs and such. Even if a manager was hired to watch them, I doubt he makes that much in a year.

      As to manager intervention, they can't do much of anything the average cashier couldn't do. Our manager's solution was to unplug it and then plug it back in. He didn't even know it had a reset button...

      I will agree that it could still be causing stores to lose money, people steal a lot of stuff through the self checkout. Or ring a cheap item and then send somethign expensive down the belt. Like ring up a pack of gum and send down razor blades. Thats part of the reason they are so annoying, to try to stop people from stealing.

    4. Re:losing money, making money, losing business? by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      It matters when your other customes waiting get fed up and just leave. I've done this several times when waiting in ridiculously long lines.

    5. Re:losing money, making money, losing business? by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Each regular register had 1 cashier and 1 bagger

      I've never understood this. Our grocery stores here (Hannaford) have this as well. It seems MUCH quicker just to have the cashier bag as they scan. This is what was done at Wegmans in Upstate NY. The other advantage is you don't have your customer standing around irritated because they've paid, and are still waiting for the bagger + cashier to catch up..

  33. "Law of Unintended Consequences" origin? by andy17null · · Score: 2, Informative

    Did this phrase originate in The Path Of Daggers, Book 8 of the Wheel of Time series by Robert Jordan? That's the only place I've seen it.

    "She could still hear Siuan going on about what she called the Law of Unintended Consequences, stronger than any written law. Whether or not what you do has the effect you want, it will have three at least you never expected, and one of those usually unpleasant."

    1. Re:"Law of Unintended Consequences" origin? by crull · · Score: 1

      I think not, but WoT are a great series of books.

      --
      this is not my signature.
    2. Re:"Law of Unintended Consequences" origin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could check Wikipedia.

    3. Re:"Law of Unintended Consequences" origin? by Maelwryth · · Score: 1

      "The first and most complete analysis of the concept of unintended consequences was done in 1936 by the American sociologist Robert K. Merton. In an influential article titled "The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action," Merton identified five sources of unanticipated consequences. The first two--and the most pervasive--were ignorance and error."

      Found that here. Might be a place to start.

      --
      I reserve the write to mangle english.
    4. Re:"Law of Unintended Consequences" origin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess we're lucky that using the self-service machines doesn't draw the attention of the Forsaken, then.

    5. Re:"Law of Unintended Consequences" origin? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Meh, that's a matter of opinion. ;) I read up to Path of Daggers and gave up after finally admitting to myself that Jordan had mired himself into an overly convoluted, meandering plot that I suspect he could barely keep track of, let alone me, a mere reader. Heck, I should've kept notes, just to keep track of all the characters, settings, and their relationships with one another... it really got quite ridiculous, IMHO.

    6. Re:"Law of Unintended Consequences" origin? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Looks like Jordan has been modifying and incorporating stuff from Wicca, specifically the three-fold law.

  34. Re:They'll just add more machines to distract/amus by wjsroot · · Score: 1

    Some of the supermarkets near me have started doing something this. They added (often lcd) TVs to the checkout lanes. They play (the same) short 'ad' on each. It is usually a fake cooking show or the like, trying to inspire the shopper to buy this or that. And not only is it video, but they each have a speaker pointed at the checkout line. Talk about in your face marketing!

    --
    Mod others as you would have them mod you.
  35. Cash and Carry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Self checkouts that basically force you to use some type of plastic and further increase the stored information on my fat tin foil covered head? NO THANKS! Cash and carry only for me please. I don't need a record of me owning a hammer or a nail gun once they confiscate everyone's firearms and I especially do not want to be barraged with advertisements for upholstered covers for the new ceramic throne I purchased for my kingdom. Now excuse me while I run off to the grocery store to buy a new roll of material for my personal haberdashery.

    1. Re:Cash and Carry by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 2, Informative

      Every self-checkout I ever used took cash via the same kind of bill acceptor and coin slot found on a vending machine. Even gives you change back...

      --
      Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
    2. Re:Cash and Carry by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      They are even better than vending machines because they accept PENNIES!

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  36. look into a ... by zogger · · Score: 1

    ...food co-op. The usual arrangement is working members at x-hours per month labor (stock, sweep floors, unload trucks-whatever) get their stuff as near to wholesale as possible.

  37. A real skill? by Travoltus · · Score: 1

    What, so they can go into college student loan debt only to find that the industry they're learning a skill for, has gone overseas?

    MBA's, I'm talking to you. Come back in 5 years and see if you aren't next. 5 years. Mark this post.

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    1. Re:A real skill? by gentlemen_loser · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, you are wrong. Remember, these are the assholes (MBAs) that are deciding to outsource skilled professional jobs. They will not outsource themselves. HR and other non-essential to core business types will go next.

    2. Re:A real skill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MBA's can be replaced. By lower cost MBA's overseas. Or, if they fail to do that, then by lower cost companies.

      American widget company: offshore white collars, onshore (expensive) MBA's and onshore (multimillionaire) CEOs

      vs

      Bangalore widget company: offshore white collars, offshore(cheaper) MBA's and offshore (cheaper) CEOs

      Whose product will be cheaper?

  38. Slower, more annoying = progress? by payndz · · Score: 1

    My local Asda just installed four self-checkouts. In the few times I've used them, I've only once gone through without needing the attending cashier to come and authorise something. Since there's only one cashier attending all four machines, if he's handling somebody else's problem you have to stand there and wait while the machine screeches "UNRECOGNISED ITEM IN BAGGING AREA! PLEASE SEEK ASSISTANCE!" over and over again. The only way it speeds things up is if there's no queue, you have at most two items, they don't require weighing, and you're not buying anything that needs an age check (ie, alcohol).

    Also, because of the way they're set out, you end up with a milling clump of people blocking the main aisle, none of whom know whose turn it is next. If they'd put the machines at the *end* of the line of checkouts they would have had the space to set up a single-queueing system like at a bank, but noooo...

    The really annoying thing is that the place used to have five basket-only lanes. Now it only has two. So you have to wait around for longer whichever you use. Yes, that's progress.

    --
    You must think in Russian.
    1. Re:Slower, more annoying = progress? by Builder · · Score: 1

      Uh, you don't live in East London do you? Because that exact situation has just happened at my local ASDA :)

  39. Let's see automated checkouts handle bulk foods... by mark-t · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Okay, the customer goes and gets a few scoops of some stuff, putting it into a baggie. He slaps a UPC code on the bag for the bin he got the product out of, and takes it to the checkout for weighing...

    Except... how, in an automated checkout, does the system know that what the UPC code says is in the bag is really in the bag? What if he made a mistake a grabbed the wrong UPC code for the product, or worse... what if he was deliberately trying to swap codes with another, cheaper product?

    A human teller can identify the mistake right then (and in all fairness, should give the consumer the benefit of the doubt, assuming it was a mistake), but a computer will just blindly allow it.

  40. It's not about saving time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its not about saving the customers time, its about adding $0.27 cents x 10,000,000,000 customer transactions to the CEO's bonus check...

    Thats what its all about.

  41. The one that gets me... by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    The one that gets me is how many stores now require you basically go through the payment system twice. Someone had this nifty idea a while ago that the customer can scan their own card, while the cashier is still ringing things up. Since the cashier rarely checks the card or signiture anyways, this should speed the whole process. The problem is that checking signitures and cards is a cyclical thing. Fraud becomes high, signitures/cards start getting checked. This reduces fraud to to point that signitures/cards are no longer checked, and the cycle begins anew. Now that we are in a check the card phase, or if you do any shopping in a higher risk area, the process goes like this:

    1) swipe card
    2) put card back in wallet
    3) wait for cashier to finish scanning
    4) have cashier ask for card
    5) get out wallet
    6) give card to cashier
    7) get card back
    8) put card away
    9) have cashier as for ID
    10) get ID out of wallet and hand to cashier
    11) get ID back from cashier

    The process should be
    1) give card to cashier
    2) get card back

    I don't include the initial getting out of the first card or putting away because these can be done while the cashier is doing something else. It makes absolutly no sense to slow down the entire process in some strange attempt to push more of the work off of the cashier and on to the customer.

  42. UNEXPECTED FIST IN SELF CHECK0UT MACHINE by britneys+9th+husband · · Score: 1, Interesting

    PLEASE REM0VE FIST FR0M SELF CHECK0UT MACHINE BEF0RE C0NTINUING

    --
    Hear recorded Slashdot headlines on your phone! New service beta testing. Just call (248) 434-5508
  43. My experience by Aramgutang · · Score: 1

    I'd have to say that my experience with self-checkout at my local grocery store (Price Chopper) has been very positive overall. Sure there are idiots who can't get the thing to work, but they comprise a suprisingly low percentage (around 10%, I'd say). The only issue to ever bug me are the seemingly random "please wait for cashier assistance" messages, which the cashier usually makes go away within a few seconds from his station. In general, if there is at least 1 person waiting at a manned checkout line, it's faster to use self-checkout, unless you're buying a bunch of produce you have to enter the codes for. One bonus of the manned stations, however, is that you can scan your credit card while the clerk is scanning the items, shaving off a couple of seconds.

    I also like to think that since there's only one employee watching over 4 self-checkout counters, they may end up passing the savings on to me. Given that they're saving 3*$6*24*365= $157,680 per year, part of that money might just go into 50%-off sales on HotPockets or Mountain Dew.

    On a side note, the self-checkout counters finally satisfied my curiousity about what happens when you scan something that isn't sold at the store (I used a pack of gum which isn't sold in the US). The answer is: the system locks up for 1-2 minutes (I think it tries to access alternate barcode databases or something), and the cashier gets really annoyed with you.

    Another observation I made is that in the first few months after they installed the machines, if you scanned two items of the same kind in a row, the system would tell you to "wait for cashier assistance", probably as a precaution against people accidentally scanning an item twice (which I would always get around by scanning another item in between the two of the same kind). Eventually, they got rid of it, I guess when they realised how often people buy more than one of the same product. However, sometimes I like to imagine that instead of having a pre-made database of the product weights, some sort of learning algorithm was implemented, where the possibility of customers cheating in the first few months was an acceptable risk, and eventually the database was filled with average weights and standard deviations for each item through regular use, though maybe I'm overestimating the competenecy of the coders who write those programs.

    And concering impulse buys near the checkout, I'm proud to say I've never made one.

    1. Re:My experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      part of that money might just go into 50%-off sales on HotPockets or Mountain Dew.

      Too bad none of the sales in a supermarket are ever related to how much money the store is saving. If there is a Buy-One, Get-One sale going on (aka 50%-off sale), the vendor from which the supermarket is getting the product is offering rebates to allow that price. It has nothing to do with how much money they save. And you have to remember, the vast majority of grocery store chains are on the market; if you save them $157,680 dollars, then instead of lowering prices, they're gonna give it to the shareholders to make them happy. Rarely, if ever, will you see cost-cutting come back to reward the consumer.

  44. Check out like Fry's Electronics by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    Has anyone picked up on the idea of how Fry's does checking out? Seriously, it's the best damn system!!! With your standard checkout lines, it runs in parallel. That is to say, each register has its own line. At Fry's Electronics however, it's done in serial. With this method, you have X number of registers in a row. Behind them you one giant line of people. This way goes much much faster because you don't have to worry about individual mini-line backing up at each register. Computer crash, failed credit card, stupid customer...it doesn't matter. You just pick the next available register when it's your turn at the front.

    Oh and there are plenty of impulse buying shelves you walk by as you go through the single waiting line. Pure genius! It's win/win for everyone!

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
    1. Re:Check out like Fry's Electronics by J-1000 · · Score: 1

      I agree. Fry's has the best approach. Not only do you check out faster, but you see far more of the impulse buy shelving on your way out. The irony is that the post office uses this same method, but only out of absolute necessity given the *two* clerks they have working.

    2. Re:Check out like Fry's Electronics by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      They didn't invent this. Border's Bookstores, The Gap, and REI's, for examples, do this also.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    3. Re:Check out like Fry's Electronics by J-1000 · · Score: 1

      Well sure, but Fry's has an especially good implementation of it. Of course that's largely due to the overabundance of clerks at the windows.

  45. Monkey Wrenching Self Checkout Lanes by FractalZone · · Score: 1

    I just don't like self-checkouts... 1) Take the elderly and/or handicapped shopping! Church groups and nursing homes often have vans or buses available for such adventures. Make sure to have the folks spread themselves as evenly as possible across the self-serve checkout lanes. Have a hidden video camera (or three! -- with mics!) handy to record whatever transpires. Wally-World dares not complain when geezers and gimps are clogging up the oh-so-efficient automated checkouts that they can't figure out or have difficulty dealing with for physical reasons. 2) Start a rumor among your favorite gossips and paranoid acquaintences that Wal-Mart is using all of those "spycams" (security cameras) at the self-serve checkout aisles to record people's PINs whenever they use payment cards that require PINs. Don't bother mentioning the fact that all the checkouts and the rest of the store is under Wallly-World surveillance...just focus on the annoying self-serve checkouts with your rumor. 3) Point out to other shoppers at Wally-World that a good cashier in a regular checkout lane can process more customers with purchases faster than an automated setup can, because most people don't practice using automated checkout systems 40 hours a week and don't get as good at "ringing items up" as even a slightly motivated human cashier is after a week or two on the job. Mention this in letters to the editor of your local newspaper and hosts of your favorite radio shows, griping about the awkward, slow automated checkout lanes in some of todays bigger stores.

    --
    "You're young, you're drunk, you're in bed, you have knives; shit happens." -- Angelina Jolie
  46. Rarely by Atario · · Score: 5, Funny
    I'm too busy slamming my fist against the screen, trying to get the dammed thing to work.
    As a technical-type guy, I should add that machines of any kind (indeed, any things of any kind) rarely can be made to operate any better by slamming one's fist against any part thereof.

    You know, just for future reference.
    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    1. Re:Rarely by mgblst · · Score: 1

      As a technical type guy, let me assure you that it feels good, feels damn good. Gotta put those machines in place, every now and again, or you never know what will happen!

    2. Re:Rarely by scolbe · · Score: 1
      As a technical-type guy, I should add that machines of any kind (indeed, any things of any kind) rarely can be made to operate any better by slamming one's fist against any part thereof.


      yer... everyone should know that you kick it.
      --
      Lead me not into temptation... I can find it myself 8+)
    3. Re:Rarely by mike77 · · Score: 1
      As a technical-type guy, I should add that machines of any kind (indeed, any things of any kind) rarely can be made to operate any better by slamming one's fist against any part thereof.

      Bull! As an Engineer, I was taught, and have learned over the years that "Impact Thearpy" is an invaluable tool for getting machines to work.

      --

      --Keeping the flame wars alive, one post at a time

    4. Re:Rarely by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      I dunno. Sometimes those bits get turned sideways and clog up the wires. The only way to fix it is to give the machine a good whack to knock em loose.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    5. Re:Rarely by p0tat03 · · Score: 1

      Works for the Fonz, works for me! :D

    6. Re:Rarely by Paladine97 · · Score: 1

      It seemed to work on the Johnny Cab.

      See you at the party Richter!!!!

    7. Re:Rarely by Generic+Guy · · Score: 1
      As a technical-type guy, I should add that machines of any kind (indeed, any things of any kind) rarely can be made to operate any better by slamming one's fist against any part thereof.

      Au contraire! As a technical-type guy I've found on many occasions that beating on the equipment can improve results. From wiggling the hub on those 3.5-inch diskettes to smacking the side of that flakey monitor. Occasionally (okay... once) I've even gotten a hard drive back into service by beating it against the countertop.

      --
      { - Generic Guy - }
    8. Re:Rarely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh slashdot the place where comments like this get marked as informative

    9. Re:Rarely by KC7JHO · · Score: 1

      Support call from lawyer in my office yesterday: My machine is making a grinding noise. I go to the office and look at the machine in question and sure enough the power supply fan is grinding away. I promptly (with as much flair as possible) punch the power supply and it stops making the noise and starts blowing air just fine. (This is a common symptom of a fan that is on it's last... fin) I stood up and said "Their ya go! Let me know if you have any more trouble outa the thing." then walked back to my office and called for a warranty replacement of the part to be next day aired to me. Yep some times you simply "MUST" slam your fist into it to make it work! Sure is fun to watch the lawyers face when you do something like this.

    10. Re:Rarely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I've always preferred the term "percussive maintenance" :)

    11. Re:Rarely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      As an Engineer, I was taught, and have learned over the years that "Impact Thearpy" is an invaluable tool for getting machines to work.

      aka "Percussive Maintenance"
    12. Re:Rarely by crabpeople · · Score: 1

      Complete rubish. Hitting or kicking something to make it work is a tried and tested tradition in every maintence occupation.

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    13. Re:Rarely by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 1

      I can think of one time it helps - cold solder joints.

      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
    14. Re:Rarely by spookyfluke · · Score: 1

      Ayyyy! Try telling that to him.

      --
      you.bases.each{|base|base.are_belong_to=us}
    15. Re:Rarely by evilviper · · Score: 1
      rarely can be made to operate any better by slamming one's fist against any part thereof.

      Never dealt with an iffy touch-screen?
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    16. Re:Rarely by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      As a technical-type guy, I should add that machines of any kind (indeed, any things of any kind) rarely can be made to operate any better by slamming one's fist against any part thereof.

      Breaking one of the God damned things DOES make it work better! Just slam HARDER! Hell, use a brick!

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    17. Re:Rarely by hicksw · · Score: 1

      As a technical-type guy, I should add that machines of any kind (indeed, any things of any kind) rarely can be made to operate any better by slamming one's fist against any part thereof.

      bashing: probability of success: low
      not bashing, that is, doing nothing: probability of success: zero.
      --
      When in doubt, punch it out - it's the American way.

  47. me too by cyclomedia · · Score: 1

    i was beginning to think that i was the only person around here that

    a) doesnt impulse buy, sure sometimes i come away with chocolate, but usually i've hunted it down, i'm very picky about my bar selections (i cant stand any form of dried fruit for a start...)

    b) LIKES the self service checkout, when all you're doing is stopping in for a 4-pinter of milk* and said chocolate hit and there's not much of a queue you can just bip, bip, dunk in a coupld of coins and you're away. hell, even the veg selection works - though they dont seem to notice when you tell it you're weighing average tomatoes and you're actually buying the twice-as-much organic variety :-)

    do you also have 10 items or less/hand basket only lanes in the US? which is sometimes a good go-between, though often has miles longer queues than the normal ailes, my tip when you've got a trolley full: go to the end of the line of lanes furthest from the exit. they seem mostly emptier for me

    * 4 pints ~= 2 litres, 1/2 gallon, 10 cups, 3 bugles, one hat, etc.

    --
    If you don't risk failure you don't risk success.
    1. Re:me too by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      Yes, we do have "express lanes" here in the US, but in typical American fashion, the guy with 18 items in the "about 10" lane won't let you and your 3 items ahead of him.

  48. Anti-Impulse Buying by Blackbird_Highway · · Score: 1

    For me, standing in line at the checkout is usually anti-impulse buying. If the wait is too long, as it usually is at the Walmart, I start leaving items on the rack next to the line. The longer the wait, the more items I dump. Recently, the line was really long, and I started with about $50 in products, and wound up purchasing only about $5 worth. Still, I don't like the self checkout because they talk too much, and too loudly. I think they are designed to appeal primarily to women, since they constantly tell you how much you are saving. (Women love that!) If they want to make more money from me, just add more cashiers to keep the lines reasonably short.

    --
    By the perception of illusion, we experience reality
  49. in my day by macadamia_harold · · Score: 1

    Sadly, for me, in corporate USA, I'd have to pay for the privledge to stock the shelves.

    Right. In my day, I had to get up in the morning at ten o'clock at night, half an hour before I went to bed, drink a cup of sulphuric acid for breakfast, work twenty-nine hours a day down at the mill, pay the mill owner 2 quid an hour for the permission to come to work, and when we got home, our Dad and our mother would kill us and dance about on our graves singing Hallelujah.

    And you try and tell the young people of today that ..... they won't believe you.

    1. Re:in my day by luckyguesser · · Score: 1

      Luxury!

      --


      The power of Christ compiles you.
      A Random Blog
  50. NO, no, no.... by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 1

    Put condoms and twinkies right next to the self check counter... Sit back and reap the benefits!

    You are a poor capitalist. What you do is you put a kiosk selling sledgehammers and crowbars right next to the shop with the self check counter... Sit back and reap the profits as people frustrated with the self check counters suddenly get in touch with their inner luddite!

    --
    Only to idiots, are orders laws.
    -- Henning von Tresckow
  51. You don't get it by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

    My local Kroger store (King Soopers) installed self-checkout lanes about 5 years ago. The #1 problem with self-checkouts is that people don't know how to use them:

    - Don't use it if you have more than 10 or so items. You won't save any time and you'll just clog up the units for the rest of us.
    - The items you buy MUST be put on the "bagging area" scale. Do not lean on the scale and don't take anything off once you put it on.

    The benefit of the system? 6 self-checkout units replaced 2 "express" lanes in my Kroger - there is rarely a line, even when the other lanes are busy. If you just want to get a couple of 12-packs of Diet Pepsi and a bag of chips, they can be very, very fast - particularly if you don't even have a cart.

    Most of the problems I've seen boil down to the fact that people don't understand how they work.

    The Fujitsu system that Kroger uses is astoundingly better than the NCR system that Wal-Mart/Home Depot uses, although it appears that the NCR system has gotten better.

    1. Re:You don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the problems I've seen boil down to the fact that people don't understand how they work.

      And there's no real directions about how to use them. Why does it keep randomly saying to put items in the bag, or take them out of the bag? If you think about it long enough, you might realize that it's trying to weigh the item, but that's not intuitively obvious. Intuitively, the step of weighing would not even exist. Cashiers scan the items, put them in bags, and set the bags aside. Self check out is a different process. There's no indication of this though, and so most people will follow the same process they see cashiers use.

      You need to know how the machines work, but to explain how they work would require probably a dozen-step process, with branching. That's a horrible process. And even if you do know how they work it still might not work right. "I PUT THE FREAKING ITEM IN THE FREAKING BAG ALREADY!" These machines are total usability nightmares.

    2. Re:You don't get it by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      I completely agree. Maybe King Soopers has smarter customers in general (heh, right)

      In the 5 years since they put them in at my local store I've never used the regular checkout. I can get a full handbasket of about 15 items through in about 2 minutes.

      My store is very busy, so self-checkout always has a line during peak hours. The 5 person line usually takes just a couple of minutes, although there are retards sprinkled through and if they line up wrong you can wait for 5-10. I watch in amazement as some person with 3 items somehow takes 5 minutes or more to checkout. The same thing happens at the post office and many other places. I have always wondered what they're doing. I wouldn't know how to make sending a package take 10 minutes.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
  52. I RTFA, and here's a glitch by alizard · · Score: 1
    selling fewer candy bars isn't likely to upset the whole apple cart.

    45% fewer impulse purchases won't upset the apple cart? This guy is obviously an IT writer, not a retail pro; hardly surprising since this is from Network World. Though I wouldn't have ended the article by shoving my foot into my mouth... despite the fact that I am also an IT writer, I write Linux tutorials for moeny.

    This guy doesn't realize how wafer-thin grocery store profits are. If the problem can't be fixed, self-service checkout will be something grocery and other retail stores *used* to do. Reconfiguring the "impulse" displays will probably work.

    Personally, I'd miss it. I'm one of those people who has very little trouble using self-checkout... though I agree that the UIs usually suck.

    1. Re:I RTFA, and here's a glitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Especially considering that the impulse purchases are usually some of the highest margin items in the store. Lettuce and cabbage may give you a few cents profit (think a couple percent profit), but candy bars and cigarette lighters can be marked up 100%.

  53. Slow down. by Hamster+Lover · · Score: 1

    Half our life is spent trying to find something to do with the time we have rushed through life trying to save.

    -- Will Rogers


    I just finished the book In Praise of Slow and while it wasn't an earth shattering read at first, it dawned on my just how much time I waste speeding through tasks and life that I never really do anything at all, or rather, never really enjoy them at all. All these frustrations in this thread about self serve checkouts, manned checkouts, beeping machines, machines that don't beep, etc. seem to highlight the need to just slow down and realize that maybe thirty seconds of your life dealing with the idiosyncracies of a self checkout machine is just not worth raising your blood pressure over. I am not trying to get all Zen on people here, but learning to savor moments of your life, even frustrating moments, will do a lot more to enrich your life than trying to find ways to add thirty seconds to the end of a day you never enjoyed and won't remember.

    Standing in line at a long checkout? Read one of the magazines, get lost in thought, or, and I know this will scare many a geek, strike up a conversation with one of your linemates. You're not going anywhere for the time being, so enjoy it. Enjoy these little moments to yourself. Since few Slashdotters ever read this far into a comment, I say if it makes you feel any better plan the gangland style murder of the idiot in front of you, the cashier, store management, whomever, in intricate detail and that time will slide by with nary a worrisome thought. Then, head over to the firearms section of the store and supply yourself with a high powered rifle and plenty of ammunition. On your way out of the store, take note of the imbecile's description and make, model and license plate of their vehicle. See? That stress is melting away.

    1. Re:Slow down. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since few Slashdotters ever read this far into a comment

      Well I did, and let me just say I'd like the last 30 seconds of my life back *click-clack*

    2. Re:Slow down. by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      Wow. I like how your post was all hippy-dippy and then you break out the guns and psycho shit. Whiplash!

      I'm sort of the same way. I don't understand people that get all worked up about things. It's most noticable behind the wheel of course, possibly because it's pretty anonymous.

      I do think about things a lot, and am bothered by ineffeciencies a little, but mostly just think of ways to improve them. Sometimes it does involve weeding out retards. I also do my own crazy stuff, like bring a book or my pile of mail everywhere. Any time I'm in a line, I just grab something out of my bag to occupy myself. It's amusing to see the people around me in line seethe, check their watches, make frantic "I'm late this fucking line" phone calls. Oh, and then they get to the front and act all surprised by every progression of the transaction, with bonus points for scrabbling around for an actual checkbook at the end.

      I just happily go through my mail, or read 10 pages of a book, or whatever.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
  54. ATM vs Self Checkout by graystar · · Score: 1

    People have enough trouble using ATMs, I hate when you are in a line to get cash out when you hear the person getting their plastic card returned - beep beep, then you hear it going in again. It is for this reason I never use the self checkouts.

    With the checkout chick it is the joy of interdependence of workers, she is highly skilled at using the reader, knows where the bar codes are on the products, and trains everyday. The average person would do it once a week, won't know where the bar code is and thus spends ages moving the box around till it scans....and that is before we get to the ATM bit.

    --
    -- Cheer, Cheer, The Red and the White.
    1. Re:ATM vs Self Checkout by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      Doesn't take much to figure out where a barcode is... if its not on the bottom its probably on the side with the instructions or nutrition facts.

      But I do believe that education level has something to do with it - my college town has a median income of something like $19,000, and WalMart didnt bother with the self-checkout. My hometown, where the median is about $27k, has them.

    2. Re:ATM vs Self Checkout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and we all know that income determines IQ.

  55. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bahahaha

    Damn, I just finished using all my mod points too.

  56. Re:They'll just add more machines to distract/amus by Tim+C · · Score: 1

    Hell a few TV sets with moving content would do it for most of the ADHD cattle out there.

    Here in the UK, my local Tescos have both put small LCD TVs up in some of the aisles, advertising products available in the aisle in which they're in. The Tesco Metro (small cut-down version, selling the basics) near my office has a couple of large LCD TVs suspended over the checkout lanes, generally playing a news channel, sometimes sport or music videos.

  57. Stick on scan patches.. by pijokela · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was in the US for the first time last summer and I war really surprised to learn that the cashiers weigh the fruit and stuff on the counter. Here is Finland we weigh them on the fruit and veggie department and get a stick on barcode label that they read on the counter.

    And guess what: they trust us to not add stuff after weighing, the cashier doesn't have a scale.

    OTOH, we don't have self checkout lanes and the cashiers do not pack our stuff in to bags as we leave.

    1. Re:Stick on scan patches.. by Secrity · · Score: 1

      Some grocery stores in the US weigh and mark produce in the produce department. In the US, I don't think that it is a matter of trust so much as it is cheaper to have the cashier weigh produce than to have people continuously staff the produce section every day from store open to close. I suspect that the US stores that weigh and price in the produce department have union contracts that require the division of labor. It seems that many US grocery stores are moving away from selling produce by customer selected weight; they are selling more produce items in pre-weighed or pre-measured bags, bunches, or containers -- or by the piece. At the same time that less produce is being sold by weight, more self service salad bars are popping up in supermarkets -- and the salad bar items are sold by weight.

    2. Re:Stick on scan patches.. by Siward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I remember produce scales and a bar tag system in stores here in the States. I think the problem here (as with most of the other complaints in these comments) is that most Americans (and perhaps people in general) aren't observant. What would the cashier do if someone brought this fruit up to the register without a bar code? Call a manager? Wait while the customer goes back to weigh the item again? Neither of those are great solutions. The grocery stores I shop at solve this problem by pre-packaging items that are typically sold by weight (such as grapes) and selling others (such as apples or bananas) as amount per fruit/vegetable, and that suits me just fine.

      I think some of the other problems mentioned in these comments break down into common sense. Do hardware stores really need self-checkout lanes? Did anyone with any training in technical design and usability look this checkout process over? Self-checkout lanes make a lot of sense (to me) in grocery stores where the customer isn't likely to buy extremely light or extremely bulky goods (though both of these exist in grocery stores, I admit), but grocery stores seem prone to placing the change dispenser/receipt printer as far away from the scanner as possible, and in the hardest-to-find places. Sometimes it seems like corporations lack common sense even more than the average person.

    3. Re:Stick on scan patches.. by plover · · Score: 2, Insightful
      we weigh them on the fruit and veggie department and get a stick on barcode label that they read on the counter.
      That used to be commonplace here in the U.S. as well. Believe it or not, it's now cheaper to buy a thousand dollar scanner/scale for each cash register than it is to have several self-weighing stations in the produce aisle. Here's why:
      • Reduced theft. It eliminates a temptation for people who might otherwise try to cheat the scales. Not only is theft expensive, but investigation and prosecution are also expensive, and they engender hard feelings amongst everyone involved -- both the alleged thief and any other store patrons who witness store security having to confront a little old lady trying to shave a dollar off the price of grapes.
      • Reduced operational costs. Those stickers that print out are expensive! Thermal stickers can cost over ten cents each for the blank stock. No stickers are needed if the register weighs the merchandise.
      • Reduced maintenance costs. The scales cost almost as much per year to cover on a maintenance contract as a whole cash register. The scanner/scales at the register only add incrementally to the cost of a register's maintenance contract; it's not nearly as much as maintaining a parts depot for a completely different machine. Don't ask me why the service companies price things the way they do, we just take advantage of it when we can.
      • Increased shelf space. Setting aside 6 square feet for a scanner and small work table removes 6 feet of shelf space that could otherwise be offering merchandise for sale. Stores figure their sales on a square foot basis, and those six feet could theoretically be generating something like a thousand dollars per year or more if they held products instead of a scale.
      It's all economics. Someone did the math, so that's where it ended up.
      --
      John
  58. not for me by Bubba-T · · Score: 1


    The local krogers store put in 6 duplex lanes of self checkout registers in but people refused to use them. They now have a single lane and it gets very little use. I have used it a couple of times, but find the store lines with real huamns checking me out moves fast enough

  59. Amen brother! We need a special lane by NevarMore · · Score: 4, Funny

    I would pay a slight premium for a special checkout lane.

    I tend to go grocery shopping once every other day, sometimes daily. It's a habt I got into last year and living in Germany has only reinforced it. I buy a few fresh items, a drink or two, and some essentials (razors, soap, lube etc.). I very rarely have any more than a shopping basket full, I usually can carry what I bought in my hands.

    When I get to the register I already have my cash or my credit card out. I've been paying for things at stores since I was 5, I don't see how people can act surprised (watch them, they do) when the cashier gets done zapping things and asks for some form of payment.

    Let me through. It isn't a personal ego thing, I'm simply going to zip right through the line and be on my way. Its common courtesy.

    On a related note, Wal-Mart shoppers in Northeast Ohio. If you see a man walking to the register and he is carrying a pack of razorblades, 2 boxes of roundnose .45, and a pack of paper targets with his credit card ready, it is exceedingly rude and possibly unwise for you and your troupe of loud running children to cut him off. I had plans this afternoon, relaxing enjoyable plans, that are now delayed for 15 minutes while you sort out what candy your kids threw in the cart and what candy your fat ass bought.

    1. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by indifferent+children · · Score: 1
      In case it's any consolation: your miserable life will be cut short by a heart attack at a surprisingly* young age.

      * Surprising to anyone who doesn't know how much stress you choose to walk around with.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    2. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by DarkSarin · · Score: 1

      They probably didn't see you there. They should have, but likely did not.

      The only time I avoid the self-checkout is if I have fresh fruits or veggies: I hate dealing with the special codes, the crazy schemes and trying to remember if I am buying Galas or Fujis this time. That's what the cashier gets paid for--to remember those codes.

      Oh, and if I see anyone approach self-checkout with a cart, then I move on: Hand baskets or carried items only, thank you very much.

      --
      "We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
    3. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by PhoenixPath · · Score: 5, Funny

      (razors, soap, lube etc.)

      Odd group of "necessities" there...

      You weren't perhaps an inmate in the German prison system, were you?

    4. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by elrous0 · · Score: 2
      According to the actuary tables, I'm most likely to die either of manual asphyxiation exacerbated by severe electrical shock or from a feces-born parasitic infection. Do you want to know why?

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    5. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      ...and trying to remember if I am buying Galas or Fujis this time.

      Here's a little tip for some of you people out there. There are these little labels stuck on most fruit that say what they are and contain the checkout code for that item (e.g., Fuji Apples 7739).

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    6. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...carrying a pack of razorblades, 2 boxes of roundnose .45, and a pack of paper targets with his credit card ready, it is exceedingly rude and possibly unwise for you..."

      Gun nuts can always dream, can't they?

    7. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by lucky13pjn · · Score: 1

      "Hand baskets or carried items only, thank you very much" I find it a bit difficult to follow this unwritten rule when the store chooses to put 4 cashiers on the floor when there are 18 stations available, making lines obscenely long at both the cashiers and the self-serve. I swear that all the stores around here are guilty of this... p.s. The only store with self serve where I live is a grocery store.

    8. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I tend to go grocery shopping once every other day, sometimes daily."

      Try making fewer trips to the store. You must spend most of your week going back and forth to the market. If you know you go through so much lube a month just buy it ahead of time.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    9. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by dR.fuZZo · · Score: 1

      On a related note, Wal-Mart shoppers in Northeast Ohio...

      I don't know if it's like this everywhere, but of the stores around here, Wal-Mart always takes by far the longest to get through the check-out line. That's one of the reasons I rarely go there. My suggestion would be: if you want to check-out faster, consider frequenting a different store.

      --
      -- dR.fuZZo
    10. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by Greatmoose · · Score: 0

      Ooo! Ooo! I know, I know! Pick me!! Lol...

      --
      Clearly I forgot to equip my +5 Codpiece of Karma.
    11. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by The+Spoonman · · Score: 1

      Try making fewer trips to the store.

      Thanks, I was going to ask about that. If each individual trip takes so long due to idiots in line, why not just not go as often and buy more when you're there?

      --
      Which is more painful? Going to work or gouging your eye out with a spoon? Find out!
      http://www.workorspoon.com
    12. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by Phragmen-Lindelof · · Score: 1

      Go to Wal-Mart at 1AM; the lines are reasonable. If you go on a Sunday afternoon or between 9AM and 6PM on a weekday, well ..... Good Luck.

    13. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      All my guesses are pretty gross. Here's one: You practice electro-autoerotic asphyxiation and enjoy tossing people's salads in 3rd world countries. If it's manual asphyxiation, you're going to need some extra equipment.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    14. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by drsquare · · Score: 1

      If he goes only once a week, most of the things he gets won't be fresh anymore. For instance a loaf of bread only lasts a day before it goes hard, and fruit and vegetables rot very quickly.

    15. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by Chowderbags · · Score: 1

      Fuji apples are 4129. (I bet that if you go to your grocery store, it will be that, regardless of where you are in America. It's always the same.)

      Yes, I've been a cashier, and it sucks, but it's at least useful for checking yourself out a bit faster.

    16. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by juuri · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's a city culture thing. Many people hit the corner market/grocery on the walk or bike road home. You never keep too much in the house because there's no need with such an availability of options. Personally I hit my local market two to four times a week, each trip taking under 15 minutes and since it's on my way home it's just a natural part of my traveling routine.

      --
      --- I do not moderate.
    17. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Bad assumption; I did this too. The store was on the way home, so I was only adding a few minutes to the day.. add them up, and its the same amount of time I'd spend buying everything for the week.

    18. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by _Swank · · Score: 2, Insightful

      where the hell do you get your fresh food that it goes bad within a day of purchasing it? because you've got to start shopping somewhere else.

      additionally, if you're buying a weeks worth of fruit, it's a good idea to buy at varying levels of ripeness. that way you can eat them when they're properly ripe.

    19. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      I pulled that number out of my ass. And actually, now that you mention 4129, it does ring a bell...

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    20. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by Politburo · · Score: 1

      Some of us, *gasp*, live within walking distance of the grocery store.

    21. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by GungaDan · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Always shop on Sunday mornings - the majority of slowtards are getting their jeebus fix at that time.

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    22. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by BVis · · Score: 1

      Way OT, but dunno if anyone would find this useful. We keep bread items (rolls, raisin bread, bagels etc) in our closed microwave when we're not using it. It keeps the bread fresher and it saves space.

      Just a suggestion.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    23. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by operagost · · Score: 1

      I doubt he's walking around with any stress. What do you think the .45 rounds are for?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    24. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by MooUK · · Score: 1

      4129? Hmmm... well, I don't think the shop I worked at (a local Co-op shop in the UK) sold Fuji apples, but I think I remember that code.

      One I definitely remember was bananas, 4011. Is that the same there?

    25. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by operagost · · Score: 1
      You are forming a false coorelation between churchgoers and long checkout lines. Clearly, if you have many Christians* in your community and they are all in church, there simply will be fewer people shopping at that time. It doesn't mean that they are slower at getting through the lines.

      Nice try at shoehorning in your anti-Christian troll.

      * not counting Saturday Sabbatarian types, like 7th Day Adventist.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    26. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On a related note, Wal-Mart shoppers in Northeast Ohio.

      If you live in NE Ohio, you are already in a world of shit. No amount of mutual courtesy will change that. Complicating matters by shopping at Wal-Mart is no way to live a happy, well-adjusted life.

    27. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      2 boxes of roundnose .45, .... I had plans this afternoon, relaxing enjoyable plans, that are now delayed for 15 minutes

      Oh boy. Only in America... "if it moves, shoot'em!" How relaxing and enjoyable is that?. ;-)

      ps. You forgot to include the semi-mandatory six-pack that generally goes along with the purchases you listed (according to my company's scan-o-matic data mining-based product purchase predictor).

    28. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by drsquare · · Score: 1

      OK then buy a fish or some prawns on Sunday and tell me how fresh it is on the following Saturday. Or a loaf of bread.

    29. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "K then buy a fish or some prawns on Sunday and tell me how fresh it is on the following Saturday. Or a loaf of bread."

      Ok..I'm with ya on the fish and shrimp..those can last 1-2 days, but, this is the second post I've seen about bread that I don't get.

      A loaf of bread easily lasts from one to two weeks just fine....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    30. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Oh boy. Only in America..."

      C'mon...we have our own special dept. in govt. for this...the ATF Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms!!

      God I love this land!!

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    31. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by Danse · · Score: 1
      OK then buy a fish or some prawns on Sunday and tell me how fresh it is on the following Saturday. Or a loaf of bread.

      See, that would be six days, basically a week. You said things go bad in a day or so. I usually buy all my veggies and stuff for the week, and they stay just fine in the fridge. If it's something that goes bad really quickly (and I can't think of anything that won't last a week off the top of my head), then make 2 trips that week.
      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    32. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by _Swank · · Score: 1

      i'll grant you the fish and prawns though a freezer can fix that problem (they were generally frozen before they got to the store, so it's not like they'll be much less 'fresh').

      as for the bread, i presume you're talking a loaf of fresh bakery bread (with no preservatives) which is definitely not the normally consumed bread in the US. we'll take our prepackaged loaf with preservatives and the bread will easily last a week or so. but bakery bread can be kept fresher a bit longer using an appropriate bread box or by placing it in a fridge. some people freeze the bread so that it lasts as long as they need it, others don't like the hassle.

      none of these things is an issue such that it would force someone to go to the market every day. if it is, that's a problem with the store.

    33. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by zCyl · · Score: 1

      A loaf of bread easily lasts from one to two weeks just fine....

      Real bakery bread will last in the refrigerator a week or two. Preservative laden toxified bread that no organism in its right mind would eat will last on the counter equally long. The problem comes when people buy real bread and leave it sitting out on a counter. If you don't get this, it is probably because you are eating bread that you should reconsider putting in your mouth, or you are habitually storing your bread in the refrigerator without realizing that some other people don't.

    34. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by kchrist · · Score: 1

      That would be the Berkeley Bowl here in Berkeley. Their produce selection is simply staggering but, for some reason I have yet to figure out, it tends to go bad faster than produce bought anywhere else. I'd chalk it up to being organic, pesticide-free, etc (being in Berkeley, and all), but even the organic produce from Whole Paycheck^WFoods lasts longer (it ought to, it costs four times as much).

      I've got a whole system now about what kinds of produce I buy during the weekly shopping trip and what kind I only buy when I'm ready to use it. Combined with making the produce-heavy meals early in the week, it works out pretty well.

    35. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by boskone · · Score: 1

      that's a great way to live, until there is civil or supply disruption. I'm not saying you should be a mountain man, and fresh food is the best, but make sure you've got some canned stuff stashed in the pantry at all times.

    36. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by cbirkett · · Score: 1

      These are PLU codes, and they're standardized all over the place. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Price_Look-Up_codes

      --
      "My fellow Americans, these are not the droids the nation is looking for."
    37. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      " Real bakery bread will last in the refrigerator a week or two. Preservative laden toxified bread that no organism in its right mind would eat will last on the counter equally long."

      Just was talking about normal, run of the mill, sliced sandwich bread which most everyone buys off the shelves of normal grocery stores. Yes, I'm sure it has preservatives. I wasn't talking about the special french bread or stuff made daily in some grocery stores that have bakeries in them. Most people don't live near a bakery to get special 'fresh' bread like you're talking about.

      doesn't matter much to me...I don't really eat bread...trying to avoid carbs from white flour.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    38. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by nuzak · · Score: 1

      My, aren't we defensive. Guess what, less people means shorter lines. My Jesus can beat up your Jesus. Now run along.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    39. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by Zerbs · · Score: 1

      NE Ohio Wal-Mart lines go alot faster than at Marc's though... you have to admit! (though they don't carry .45 and paper targets) Point being (for non NE Ohio people), the only thing worse than self checkout lanes is trying to checkout at a discount store that insists on using 1970's era cash registers instead of scanning UPCs, and where people regularly try to slip through the express lane with a cartfull of crap.

      --
      "22 astronauts were born in Ohio. What is it about your state that makes people want to flee the Earth?" Stephen Colbert
    40. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by adpowers · · Score: 1

      I also utilize Just-In-Time shopping. If I need something, I'll walk a few blocks, or ride my bike a few miles, and pick it up. I don't need a car to carry 6-8 bags of groceries, and my food is fresh.

      And if you have a stash left over from Y2K, you don't need to worry about stocking up on non-pershibles for bird flu! :)

    41. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by adpowers · · Score: 1

      Freezing is a great way to keep bread fresh. I've had loafs of bread in my freezer for a week and, after allowing ample time for them to defrost, they are almost as fresh as they day I got them.

    42. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by drsquare · · Score: 1

      After even half a day, bread is no longer fresh, it's not as spongy or warm. By the second day it's going dry and stiff.

    43. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by drsquare · · Score: 1
      i'll grant you the fish and prawns though a freezer can fix that problem
      Obviously, prawns out of the freezer taste like they're just out of the sea...

      we'll take our prepackaged loaf with preservatives and the bread will easily last a week or so.
      It might last a week, but it won't be fresh for a week.
    44. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by BVis · · Score: 1

      Dear $deity, this is what it sounds like in Martha Stewart's head.

      *goes off to drink self into a coma*

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    45. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by adpowers · · Score: 1

      Notice I said "got" instead of "bought". I don't think Martha Stewart gets her bread from a dumpster.

    46. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

      "Preservative laden toxified bread that no organism in its right mind would eat will last on the counter equally long."

      Hmmm, there are some blueish-green organisims that seem to LOVE the bread I leave on my counter...

    47. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by runcible · · Score: 1

      >You never keep too much in the house because there's no need

      Availability of options, my ass. My kitchen is the size of an airline lavatory, it'll only hold a day's worth of food at a time.

      Come join me in lovely New York!

      --
      remember the wisdom of Mahatma Gandhi: If enough peasants die horribly, someone will probably notice
    48. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by zCyl · · Score: 1

      Just was talking about normal, run of the mill, sliced sandwich bread which most everyone buys off the shelves of normal grocery stores. Yes, I'm sure it has preservatives.

      "Everyone" eats that bread the same way "everyone" used to smoke. Given the studies that have come out in the last decade or so on the physical and mental health consequences of the preservatives that have started appearing in bread recently, you should not be surprised if this changes substantially within our lifetimes.

    49. Re:Amen brother! We need a special lane by DarkSarin · · Score: 1

      I know about the stickers, but it is still sometimes easier and quicker to take it through the full-service lane. Besides, I don't remember seeing that on my cucumbers. Not all fruits have the stickers, and even then, I don't like the way self-service lanes generally handle the fruit.

      Of course, it's been a long time since I did that, so it might be better now.

      THen there is Bloom. Go to one if they are near you. They rock. They give you a scanner at the door (optional, though), and you scan as you shop, and then pay at checkout and move on. It's an interesting solution, but I suspect that they have somewhat higher than usual shrinkage.

      Oh well.

      Oh, and for those that mentioned the standardization--thanks. I had no idea, but this will help. I can now start memorizing the codes i use the most.

      --
      "We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
  60. When does hydrogen-powered toy story II come out? by TheScienceKid · · Score: 1

    I'm sure this is probably redundant/offtopic or something, but I thought it was funny. Yay me!

    (My "checkout" word was "retracts" - how appropriate!)

  61. shoplift those suckers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's actually pretty simple. Hold two small items in your hand. Scan one item, place TWO items in bag. The machine knows the approximate weight of the items but small discrepancies don't usually trigger the alert. And those scales aren't that precise, anyway. (it helps to put your hand (and the items) ALL the way down into the bag and SET the items on the scale, don't toss 'em)

    I do it all the time, at HD in particular because they don't really seem to care. The machine once puked out on me and the "cashier" came over with her key to reset it, and while she was there she copped and attitude. I said, "Hey, I don't know why I've gotta do your job, anyway, so just reset the thing so I can get out of here." Screw 'em. If they're not gonna hire real people to work as cashiers, then I'm going to trick the machine and steal small items whenever possible.

    1. Re:shoplift those suckers by zimus · · Score: 1
      And those scales aren't that precise, anyway.

      Yet sneezing on the scales always seems to result in the "Please remove anomalous item from bagging area" messages.
      --
      Is your terror cell living in terror? Is your safe-house not so safe? If so, read the New York Times, the jihad journal.
  62. No way by HamiltonFamily · · Score: 1

    I refuse to use self-service checkout because I am not getting paid to work for the store. If the store offered 5% or more off the bill I might consider it.

  63. unpaid complaintsr... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's that. The amusing thing about all these complaints is that these are techno-junkies complaining. You all love technology, but hate the consequences. Technology has made it easier to do your job from India. Technology has made it easier to eliminate cashiers (union or not, they don't get paid that much). Even the public library has self-checkout. Throw in everyone's desire for "low low prices (TM)", and you have the present situation. We all are getting exactly what we deserve.

    1. Re:unpaid complaintsr... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1
      You all love technology, but hate the consequences. Technology has made it easier to do your job from India. Technology has made it easier to eliminate cashiers (union or not, they don't get paid that much). Even the public library has self-checkout. Throw in everyone's desire for "low low prices (TM)", and you have the present situation. We all are getting exactly what we deserve.
      No one likes being forced to adapt. Ideally, if we're freeing up labor from pretty much zero-gain jobs, this would benefit everyone in the long run. That labor could be better utilized doing something else. That's from the perspective that more-production-is-always-good.

      From a moral standpoint, I'd say that those getting these outsourced jobs often are benefited more by the job than those who lost those jobs when they were outsourced. I can't value the humanity of someone more than someone else based solely on where they live.

      It's basically just nimbyism in a different form... sure, the benefits to society are there, but some individuals will be negatively affected. Most people have no problem with this until they are personally one of the ones negatively affected.
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:unpaid complaintsr... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, it's different to Nimbyism. It's Luddism, plain and simple.

    3. Re:unpaid complaintsr... by 14CharUsername · · Score: 1

      the benefits to society are there, but some individuals will be negatively affected. Most people have no problem with this until they are personally one of the ones negatively affected.

      Why are you so sure that it does benefit society? Maybe everyone working 12 hours a day, 7 days a week in a tiny cubicle might do wonders for corporate porfit margins, employee income and GDP, but is such a lifestyle really better? Not everyone is satisfied with being a cog in the machine, working all day on a computer, making all your purchases using machines, and then going home and being entertained by various electronic gizmos. Isn't human interaction worthwhile?

      Frank Herbert once wrote that the problem with machines is that the devices themselves condition their users to employ each other the same as they employ machines. How often do brain dead managers use arbitrary numbers on a spreadsheet to measure employee value? How does that make employees feel?

      Be careful that you don't factor out our humanity in the quest for greater efficiency. Efficiency is not a substitute for happiness.

    4. Re:unpaid complaintsr... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1
      Why are you so sure that it does benefit society? Maybe everyone working 12 hours a day, 7 days a week in a tiny cubicle might do wonders for corporate porfit margins, employee income and GDP, but is such a lifestyle really better?
      Where is that assumption of working conditions coming from? The reason I think it benefits society is because it leads to greater wealth overall -- whether that wealth comes in the form of higher profits for the privileged few, or increased leisure time for the workforce, is not a matter of technology -- that's a matter of social construct.

      Also, please note -- this isn't about more efficient production of a good -- it's about more efficient allocation of labor resources.
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  64. People WANT THEM? by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

    Granted my personal experience is anecdotal, but I do not know one single person who WANTS self checkout. Stores are moving to this model to save labor costs, not because of some public outcry demanind self checkout.

    1. Re:People WANT THEM? by JavaLord · · Score: 1

      Granted my personal experience is anecdotal, but I do not know one single person who WANTS self checkout. Stores are moving to this model to save labor costs, not because of some public outcry demanind self checkout.

      I love self checkout, it means I don't have to deal with the barely human checkout clerks, or stand behind someone with a cartload of things when I just want to buy some break and milk. I'd rather deal with a computer then a person, especially a rude/dumb person. Doesn't most of Slashdot feel that way?

    2. Re:People WANT THEM? by OldeTimeGeek · · Score: 1
      stand behind someone with a cartload of things when I just want to buy some break and milk.

      If I see someone behind me with just a couple of things, I always wave them forward to go in front of me. I'm very seldom in so much of a hurry that I have to get out first.

      I'd rather deal with a computer then a person, especially a rude/dumb person. Doesn't most of Slashdot feel that way?

      No, I'd much rather deal with a person than a computer. Which may or may not make me different from most Slashdotters. Computers won't notice that the milk carton is leaking, won't replace fruit because they noticed that it's bruised nor will they find the one cracked egg that you didn't see in the egg carton. They can't commisserate with you when your favorite team lost again, share a laugh about the weather or do anything that is in any way outside of what they're set up to do.

      You may get annoyed from time to time with a clerk, but you'll never, ever, get a smile from a computer.

    3. Re:People WANT THEM? by lazarusdishwasher · · Score: 1
      They can't commisserate with you when your favorite team lost again, share a laugh about the weather
      How about we learn from the barber who wanted to be a lumberjack and place a recording of a generic conversation that starts when you begin using the machine. http://orangecow.org/pythonet/lumberjack.html
    4. Re:People WANT THEM? by karmatic · · Score: 1

      Well, now you do.

      Call me anti-social if you want, but all things being equal, I'll take the self checkout over a human, even if both lines are empty.

      I don't particularly like to shop, and I prefer to be done with it as quickly as possible. Unless I have so many items that I can't just hit "skip bagging" (I bag in the cart - it's faster), I will be out of there way quicker than with a cashier. Give me the tools to get what I want, pay for it, and get on my way.

      For one thing, I tend not to shop alone. A computer won't interrupt the conversation I'm having with some irrelevant, unwanted conversation related to the weather or some sports team I really don't care about. It's less likely to dispense the wrong change, and I have direct control (in the sense that I can observe and take action) over the entire process. Sure, in the event of a mis-scan or the like, my recourse is limited to getting a human being to fix the problem, but given the likelyhood of such an incident, that is acceptable.

      All in all, I'd much rather put my faiith in a computer than a person. Computers are consistant in behavior, and don't suffer from "bad days", household/marital issues, dyslexia, or the like.

    5. Re:People WANT THEM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Computers won't notice that the milk carton is leaking, won't replace fruit because they noticed that it's bruised nor will they find the one cracked egg that you didn't see in the egg carton.

      Wow. You suck at shopping.

  65. Re: "Which would you rather have?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give me the mind numbing $17.50 every time.

  66. People aren't stupid the machines are horrible by technoextreme · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I work at Home Depot, as a cashier. I can back up all of parent's statements; people lose about fifty IQ points when faced with the self checkout. That's why ours have a cashier supervising them.

    No. You just think that is the reason why the cahsiers are there. The real reason why is those machines fail pretty often. It's a pretty common occurance where the machine thinks that I didn't place an item into the bag but I did. Usually happens where the item's weight is pretty variable from item to item(ie Baked goods, nuts,washers, etc etc). The problem is that the thing relies on weight. The machine locks up and then you need someone to over ride the machine.
    --
    Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
    1. Re:People aren't stupid the machines are horrible by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      Well, you do have a point in that the scale part is the weak point in the whole application. Local grocery store has them right next to the door, so if the door opens on a windy day, all the machines near the door freak out and tell you to put scan the item before putting it in the bag or put the item just scanned in the bag. Fun.

      On the other hand, oh yes, oh yes, the people who use those things are slow as turtles. They plod through their thirty items, then the screen will present payment options, and they'll start at it for 5 minutes, trying to figure out if its a trap, then they'll select "cash" and count out the goddamn cash to the fricking penny!!

      Grrrrrr. I take pleasure in ripping my 10 items through so fast that I pass that idiot in the parking lot. Those things are simple enough that a monkey could use 'em, which only convinces me that there are some inferior monkeys in my town.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    2. Re:People aren't stupid the machines are horrible by Chelloveck · · Score: 2, Insightful
      On the other hand, oh yes, oh yes, the people who use those things are slow as turtles.

      The few times I've had the "pleasure" of using the self-scan machines, it was the machine that was slow as a turtle. I scan one item, put it down, scan the next immediately... "Please place the first item in the bagging area." It's there, you freakin' machine! So I have to pick it up and put it back down, then scan the second item again. If I ever scan one item within a second of putting the previous one down, I get to do the dance all over again. The... machine... forces... me... to... go... slow...

      The only time I'll use those stupid machines is when I have exactly one item and there's no line. Otherwise, I'll wait for a human cashier. The human line may take longer on a busy day, but it saves me a huge amount of frustration.

      Of course, at the stores I usually go to I've also learned which cashier's line never to get in, even if it is the shortest. These must be the people the machines are geared for, 'cause damn they're slow!

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
  67. Re:Let's see automated checkouts handle bulk foods by Somebody+Is+Using+My · · Score: 1

    At least at my local grocer, the system displays a "Please wait for cashier" message after you scan in a bulk item (apples, candy, whatever), at which point the attendant is supposed to come and visually verify that is what is on the scale matches up with the barcode.

    In actuality what happens is that the system beeps "Please wait for the cashier", and the attendant just pushes a button without verifying just to keep the line moving.

    But yeah, the designers did TRY to take things like that into consideration

  68. It's a new technology by SamSim · · Score: 1

    ...and it needs to be treated as such. Everything goes through test phases and everything takes time to figure out. It's a feedback loop - we try to figure out how the machines work, while the supermarkets try to figure out how to make them work. Sure, they aren't perfect at launch, but that's because they made mistakes and also, nobody knows how to use these things at the speed a regular cashier does anymore. Five years from now, I reckon

    1) There will be an extremely obvious and intuitive *standardised* interface at these devices (or maybe two or three)
    2) Everybody who ever does any grocery shopping will know instinctively how to use said interfaces, the same way we can all use ATMs
    3) People will have got over the novelty of self-checkouts, and gone back to using regular cashiers when they have enough items that this is faster.

    Clearly the whole system has advantages and disadvantages, and at least one of those disadvantages - nobody knows how they work - will disappear with time. I, for one, have confidence.

    1. Re:It's a new technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? How often do you use the ATM?

      Maybe I'm just incredibly unlucky, but I always seem to get stuck behind people who don't have a clue what they're doing. They don't follow the instructions (or if they do, they laboriously read everything on the screen very, very slowly), they don't select extra transactions while they're getting cash so the card gets ejected and they have to start again and they always, always have a receipt printed out, even though 99% of them toss them on the ground (or leave them hanging out the machine) without even having read them! And this isn't just the odd one or two people, it's practically every single time I go to get cash.

  69. Endless "remove unexpected item"/"place item" loop by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

    Virtually every time... say, three times out of the last four... I'll get thrown into a loop in which I scan an item, it says "Please place item in bag," I place it in the bag, it says "Unexpected item in bagging area! Please remove item," I remove it, it says "Please place item in bag," lather, rinse, repeat.

    I have never been able to figure out how to deal with this or what I'm supposed to do... other than call for help. If anyone knows the cause and cure, please let me know. Try not to insult me any more than absolutely necessary in the process.

    (The fourth time didn't work either. I was checking out half-a-dozen nutrition bars of different flavors. One of them wouldn't scan. It didn't offer me any sensible options, like keying in the UPC by hand. Eventually... after my wife, initially convinced I was being clumsy or stupid or both, satisfied herself that it wouldn't scan for her either... we settled for purchasing the five, and dropping the unscannable bar onto a random nearby surface).

  70. NEEDED - 'new shopper' lines vs 'experienced' by mgkimsal2 · · Score: 3, Funny

    The self-checkout lanes need 'done this before' aisles and 'new to tech' aisles. Not sure how best to word it, but that's a far better indicator of how quick you're going to get through vs. how many items someone has. I almost feel cheated when I go through self-service lanes (or ATMs) because I never get to take much time. I swear people in front of me at ATMs must sometimes be trading stocks or applying for a mortgage considering how long it takes them to insert the card and get $20 out.

    1. Re:NEEDED - 'new shopper' lines vs 'experienced' by flooey · · Score: 1

      I swear people in front of me at ATMs must sometimes be trading stocks or applying for a mortgage considering how long it takes them to insert the card and get $20 out.

      I was getting tired waiting at the ATM the other day, so I looked over the guy's shoulder, and he was just finishing up Baron Geddon.

    2. Re:NEEDED - 'new shopper' lines vs 'experienced' by instarx · · Score: 1

      The self-checkout lanes need 'done this before' aisles and 'new to tech' aisles. Not sure how best to word it, but that's a far better indicator of how quick you're going to get through vs. how many items someone has. I almost feel cheated when I go through self-service lanes (or ATMs) because I never get to take much time. I swear people in front of me at ATMs must sometimes be trading stocks or applying for a mortgage considering how long it takes them to insert the card and get $20 out.

      The problem isn't "done this before", but all the various error messages that that require some arcane action to be taken. It isn't like I actually do anything wrong, the machine just can't accept anything that is even slightly out of the expected action. I can't go too fast, or too slow, or scan the same item five times when I have five of them, or clear out space in the bag shelf when it gets full, or take an item out of a bag because it looks like it scanned wrong, or even FOR CRYIN OUT LOUD feed bills to the machine before coins! Can't the programmers figure this stuff out? And then if I take too long trying to get everything ready and perfect for the machine, whether it is paying or bagging or scanning, it starts repeating the stinking instructions to me over and over and over again. YES! I KNOW I have to scan the next item, thank you, YES! I KNOW I have to pay now!, YES! I KNOW I have to put the item in the bag now! - just shut up!

      I refuse to use them anymore.

  71. Learn it, Live it, Love it by mjohnsond · · Score: 1

    I live about 3 blocks from a Kroger. I admit that I had trouble with the self checkout machines when they were first introduced. I feared the change. I was worried that I wouldn't be able to operate the machine, and that turned out to be correct, at first. There were, of course, a couple of humorous encounters which the machine definitely won. My first big realization was that the machine was weighing the food after I scanned it. That was huge, as I was being held up having to wait for the supervisor to approve the scan. Things got much better and I was able to use the self scan proficiently for small purchases, but I was still not using the self scan often as I was afraid to use it for anything without a barcode. Once I conquered that then the issue became only how much was in my cart. I use the checkout pro's for large loads, and the self checkout for medium and small loads, and I can do so with speed and accuracy. What it boils down to is practice. Most of the people reading this are younger, technical people who don't have much trouble learning something like this. My mom, who is in her 50's, has a terrible time with the self checkout. She is slow, she doesn't understand it and frankly I don't think she cares.

  72. Faster? Give me a BREAK by macinrack · · Score: 1
    I don't know what someone was smoking when they came up with this horrible idea. I am far from a technophope. I have been taking apart stuff since I was a toddler. I have changed car engines and transmissions. I do almost all of my own automotive repairs. I own and operate two internet hosting companies, and I operate and repair my own unix servers. I am a small plane pilot, and could find my way across the country, if I had the need. I do have a clue. However, these self-checkout lanes are absolutely horrible. I refuse to use them ever again. No two stores are alike, and every single time I have been conned into using it by giddy store personnel, I sorely regretted it. The final time, I watched people stream through the human checkout as store personnel attempted in vain to repair the latest problem with their equipment. Never again.

    This does not even address the issue of SERVICE. These assholes install this lovely equipment, open 6 u-do-it lanes, and leave one human lane open, that doubles as the customer service desk. Imagine, you go to customer service to get a human, and you wait while somebody argues with the employee over a return. Good grief. Thats on top of making you sign up to belong to some club (database soon to be shared) to see the savings that stores used to be happy to offer simply to get you to come through the door. Don't get me started about walking to the far corner of the 50,000 sq ft building for a gallon of milk.

    Fortunately, in my area of New Hampshire, there are Farmers' markets springing up everywhere. Fresh meats, veggies, breads- really, I eat better, and I dont feel like a number, or second class, or ostracized because I cant figure out some blooming idiot's idea of automation.

  73. Progress, Frogs or Sheep? by DeanFox · · Score: 1


    These same arguments were made when ATMs first came out.

    "Am I going to get a discount for not going into the bank and using a teller?"

    Now bank tellers are pretty much non-existent and to add injury to insult not only is there no discount you have to pay a surcharge to get money from the ATM. Self-checkout lanes will grow to become the norm; soon assisted checkout will no longer exist.

    Car insurance companies have already implemented in some states giving discounts to customers if they install black boxes that monitor their driving. Today it's optional. Soon you won't be able to get insurance without one. After they establish that they'll move to the next logical course of action. They wont cover your accident if you were X% over the speed limit.

    This is defined either as progress or that we're are Frogs in ever increasing water temperature.

    Once, drug related property seizure laws affected only the drug lords. On I75 that runs from Florida up to Canada, cars are stopped and if you have what the officer thinks is too much cash he takes it. Doesn't matter if you're with your family and have tickets to Disney Land, that 3,000 in cash becomes property of the police and to get it back have to prove it's not drug money.

    This is defined either as progress or that we're Sheep.

    From ATMs, to self-checkout, drug related property seizure to you name it... This is the direction we're headed. A lot of you won't use self-checkout. But you will. In your lifetime it will become that there will be no other option available.

    1. Re:Progress, Frogs or Sheep? by silverbax · · Score: 1

      Please post the link(s) to any stories proving the family/police theft story.

      I'm not one to ignore the 'police state' imending drum, but linking a corrupt police practice with Orwell's 1984 is a huge stretch, made with a flimsy offhand reference. Police have been corrupt for a long time, and are more regulated now that ever. It used to be that a minority driving though South Carolina could be stopped, pulled out of their car (with their kids watching) and driven to jail until they came up with bail/extortion money. This wasn't in 2006, this happend as recently as the 1980's to my own family members and as far back as the 50's. Today, if this happens, you can sue the pants off any county cop who does that.

      I'm more worried about the corporate veil, and the anonymous power of thos corporations, than I am about the ATM or grocery store checkout line.

    2. Re:Progress, Frogs or Sheep? by DeanFox · · Score: 1

      "Please post the link(s) to any stories proving the family/police theft story. ...huge stretch, made with a flimsy offhand reference." It's not that people make flimsy, offhanded remarks. The problem is you're either too lazy or too stupid to keep up with current events or do your own homework. Stop asking for "proof" when with a little effort you can learn these things yourself. Thank charge of your own education and quit asking to be spoon fed. I'll make a guess who you voted for, LoL. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/snit ch/readings/hidden.html http://www.reconsider.org/tidbits/2000-05-31%20Sur e%20sounds%20like%20stealing%20to%20me_.htm For example, a traffic stop in the Texas Panhandle last week resulted in seizure of more than $32,000 in cash, reported the Amarillo Globe News: Troopers pulled over a Pontiac sedan for speeding about 5:30 p.m. Friday, reports show. The driver consented to a search, and a drug dog found more than $32,800 in the trunk of the car. A drug dog alerting to cash suggests that drugs may have been in contact with the money at some time, according to DPS. The cash was for http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/50450_assets13 .shtml

    3. Re:Progress, Frogs or Sheep? by silverbax · · Score: 1

      I've already seen all of those articles. I'm well aware of the governments' usage of the laws to line their own pockets. There's a big gap between a wrongfully accused pilot and a 'family going to Disneyland'. Also, still no connection to your offhand reference and the impending police state, OR how it links to grocery scanning technology.

    4. Re:Progress, Frogs or Sheep? by DeanFox · · Score: 1


      Wow! You're smart. Boy, you sure got me there, you win. Feel better?

    5. Re:Progress, Frogs or Sheep? by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      An example of abused drug laws?

      http://www.cato.org/raidmap/

      In an early morning drug raid on October 2, 1992, 31 officers from five police agencies break down the door to the multimillion dollar home of Donald Scott.

      Frightened, Scott's wife screams, "Don't shoot me. Don't kill me." Hearing his wife's screams, Scott emerges from his bedroom holding a handgun, still groggy from a recent cataract operation. When Scott raises the gun in the direction of the police intruders, the raiding officers shoot him dead.

      Despite assurances from the L.A. Sheriff's Department that Scott was farming more than 4,000 marijuana plants on his property, thorough search of Scott's property fails to yield any contraband. In fact, Scott's friends would later say he was adamantly opposed to illicit drugs.

      Though Scott's grand Malibu ranch is in Ventura County, California, no Ventura police agency was represented among the five police agencies (the L.A. Sheriff's office, the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Border Patrol, the National Guard and the National Park Service) that conducted the raid. A blistering subsequent investigation by Ventura County district attorney Michael Bradbury suggests why.

      Bradbury found gross misstatements of fact, omissions, and outright falsehoods in the application for a search warrant issued by the L.A. sheriff's department. He found that the department had conducted numerous investigations of the ranch, including flyovers and firsthand visits, which found no evidence of marijuana cultivation. Finally, during a low-level flyover one DEA agent suggested to the sheriff's department that he had spotted some plants beneath tree cover that might be marijuana -- but stipulated that his observation ought not be the basis of a search warrant. On that evidence, the L.A. sheriff's department obtained its warrant.

      Bradbury concluded that, confirming Donald Scott's fears, the L.A. sheriff's department conducted its raid for the purpose of seizing Donald Scott's property through drug asset forfeiture laws. Under federal law, the department would have been able divvy up proceeds from the $2.5 million ranch with the four other agencies joining in the investigation. Bradbury found documents in which the investigating agencies had expressed desire for Scott's land on various "wish lists," and one notation in which sheriff's department officials had taken note of the recent sale value of one parcel of Scott's land.

      According to an L.A. deputy district attorney at the time, two of the agents conducting the raid posed for a triumphant photograph after Scott was shot and killed.

      In January 2000, the L.A. Sheriff's Department settled with Scott's family for $5 million, though the terms of the settlement admitted no wrongdoing. In fact, officers from the department who conducted the raid have insisted from the beginning that both the raid and the shooting of Scott were justified, despite the absence of any illegal substances. L.A. Sheriff's Department Captain Larry Waldie told the Los Angeles Times, "I do not believe it was an illegal raid in any way, shape or form." Five years after the raid, Garry Spencer, the officer who both led the raid and who killed Scott told the same paper, "I don't consider it botched. I wouldn't call it botched because that would say that it was a mistake to have gone there in the first place, and I don't believe that."

      Sources:

      Michael Fessier, Jr., "Trail's End; Deep in a Wild Canyon West of Malibu, a Controversial Law Brought Together a Zealous Sheriff's Deputy and an Eccentric Recluse. A Few Seconds Later, Donald Scott Was Dead," Los Angeles Times Magazine, August 1, 1993, p. 26.

      Michael D. Bradbury, Report on the Death of Donald Scott, Office of the District Attorney, County of Ventura, State of California, March 30, 1993.

      "Fair End in Police Abuse Case," Los Angeles Times, editorial, January 13, 2000, p. B9.

      Daryl Kelley, "Ventura D.A. Says Fatal Raid Was Unjustified," Los Angeles Times, March 30, 1993, p. A1.

      Scott Hadly, "Officer criticized over 1992 raid still wants vindication," Los Angeles Times, December 3, 1997, p. B3.

    6. Re:Progress, Frogs or Sheep? by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      Decongestant, batteries, automotive fluids... all purchase records electronically stored.

      cause enough to seize your home.

  74. Surprised? by PMuse · · Score: 1

    Seriously, are you telling me that they didn't know that slowing down checkout increased impulse buys? Surely the guys selecting items for the checkout aisle had that figured a long time ago.

    --
    "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
  75. Managers can't run them either... by embracethenerdwithin · · Score: 1

    I worked in a Grocery store for 6 years(High school and half of college). I often times ended up watching the 4 self checkout machines at our store. I hated almost every minute of it.

    The machines often don't work propery, no one really knows how to fix them and they crash and need a reboot at least 5 times a day. Our manager had no idea how these magical boxes worked, and often paid a technician 50-100 bucks to come reboot the thing or something like that.

    You see the problem isn't just that customers can't work them it is that managers at grocery stores have no idea how they work. So instead of fixing the problem we would often work around it or ignore it.

    My manager loved the fact that I could fix computers; sometimes I would fix the machines for him. The things actually are running Windows XP or 2000 most of the time. When you boot them up you can actually get to the desktop and work it like a normal computer(touch screen is like the mouse). Ours even had 3D Pinball installed on them!

    The customers do suck at using them. However, when the guy in charge of the store has to look at the instructions everytime he goes to turn it on you know it's not going to work well.

    The other big problem the machines caused our store was theft. I caught a lot of people trying to swindle the machine, but I'm sure lots more got away. You know something is wrong when you hear "Please move your soup to the belt" and you look over and see a steak going down the belt. The things have weight sensors, but as long as the weights are decently close it will accept it. Employees can set the tolerance, ours was pretty forgiving. Also, many people just never scan larger items. They just leav it in the cart and say they "forgot"....

    1. Re:Managers can't run them either... by DarkDragonVKQ · · Score: 1

      I've never worked at one. (all my jobs have been IT related or social science related). But I have to agree. My girlfriend works at this grocery chain (I think they're like a Walmart but only on the west coast). It's called Fred Myers (something like that). And she says the checkout machine glitches to often. So even if she's carrying about 5 items she'll skip the checkout line depending on how its doing that day.

      --
      "I thought what I'd do was I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes" ~ Laughing Man - GITS:SAC
  76. I had the same trouble with dryers by Prototerm · · Score: 1

    Getting them to fit on the scale was a real PIA, y'know?

    --
    "My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right." --Senator Carl Schurz (1872)
  77. Pop ups on their way to the self checkout by Brix+Braxton · · Score: 1

    It should be obvious - the self checkout will start offering different impulse items. Things that people forget about or are a hassle to go out and buy might start coming up as offers in the form of pop-ups - and they will be conveniently located a short distance past the checkout lane. For example "would you like to add charcoal to this order?" or "did you remember to buy laundry detergent? Press 1 to add 1 gallon of Tide" - or "take advantage of our hot summer savings - enjoy a cool Diet Sprite on the way home .89 cents - click HERE!". Because of the preferred savings cards - all kinds of information is stored. They can do all kinds of marketing - and charge .75 cents per "click through" to the co-reg that benefits (like - getting a landscaping quote from a landscaper near you, or a siding quote or whatever).

    It's just a matter of time for someone to figure it out.

    --
    www.wildpad.com
  78. Nah, the farking things just don't work... by maillemaker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    >I work at Home Depot, as a cashier. I can back up all of parent's statements;
    >people lose about fifty IQ points when faced with the self checkout. That's
    >why ours have a cashier supervising them.

    I always thought the reason you have a cashier supervising them was because the FUCKING SELF CHECKOUT MACHINES DON'T FUCKING WORK.

    I've all but given up on "self-check out".

    Self check-out means wagging your purchase over the scanner at 15 different angles waiting for the "beep" of success, and then putting the thing in the bag only to have the computer continue to ask me to put it in the bag. Or randomly being told to "please wait for assistance" so the supervising cashier can come blindly type in some code and overwride the error. And all for the joy of then walking out the door and setting off the shoplifting alarm.

    Further, if I'm going to do the job that used to get done FOR me, I should get some benefit for it, like a discount.

    Steve

    --
    A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.
    1. Re:Nah, the farking things just don't work... by legojenn · · Score: 1

      I've never had a problem with those checkouts at Home Depot or Loblaws (an Ontario/Quebec grocery chain), but when I do cross-border shopping at BJ's, it gets frustrating. It's annoying to see my stuff slide down the conveyor belt and just come back to me. for rescanning. The advantage of it is that I can gt rid of all my US change and one-dollar bills without a surly look from the cashier before I swipe my credit card for the bulk of the purchase.

      --
      I make a reasonable middle-class wage by going to work and not spamming blogs with scams.
    2. Re:Nah, the farking things just don't work... by can'tthinkofagoodnic · · Score: 1

      That's funny--I was just about to comment that while I hate the self-checkouts at Home Depot and Wal-Mart, where you put stuff directly into a bag, I like the self-checkouts at BJs and my local grocery store, where you put it on the conveyor belt. The weighing seems better with the conveyor belt--each item has a second or two to get settled, then it weighs it on the way to your bags.

    3. Re:Nah, the farking things just don't work... by instarx · · Score: 1

      I always thought the reason you have a cashier supervising them was because the FUCKING SELF CHECKOUT MACHINES DON'T FUCKING WORK.

      I've all but given up on "self-check out".


      I agree 100%. I don't use self-checkout because I know I will be talking to myself by the time the experience is over and I will be in a bad mood for hours. The human interaction part of these things is pathetic. The machines should be designed to operate in a way that is logical for humans, not try to force humans into doing things in weird non-intuitive ways to satisfy the machine's logic.

  79. technology? by ClayTapes · · Score: 0

    i dunno, I for one am for this tchnology. I'm a Hollister model and as it is now, i spend hours checking myself out. My time is valuable.

  80. Oh really now. by Captian+Obias · · Score: 1

    So, this implies that the average consumer is faster at checking himself out faster than a somewhat trained cashier. I've been through a few around here and some of the users still dont realize that you are suppose to scan the barcode and just keep sliding the package over the scanner.

  81. Laziness by Sunny7L · · Score: 1

    I rarely use self-checkout. And then only when there's absolutely no line and I have less than 5/6 items. Otherwise, until I get a discount/noticeable savings for doing it myself, a cashier is going to ring up my stuff.

    Plus, often times EVERYBODY is in the self-checkout. Making that line WAY longer than the regular lines.

    But these self-checkouts are sprouting up everywhere. Even my local library has adopted this policy -- I'm definitely waiting for a few lazy a-holes to get laid off. There I admittedly prefer it since I can avoid sh!tty customer service.

  82. Any store managers care to coment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Is their anyone out a store manager or in charge of some area related to service that can comment as to if these things actually save enough money to justify?
     

    I ask because as a consumer who's used them in targets, and grocery stores (some Safeway for instance) they on the surface anyway don't seem to save enough to bother since a human has to be their for any number of reasons-a machine doesn't work as expected, or it's giving misleading feadback or the machine breaks
     


  83. um, clearly not insightful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Insightful? No. Self checkouts ACCEPT cash. Why bother posting about something you know nothing about? (Well, at least you don't know something as simple and obvious as self checkouts being able to accept bills and coins AND give out change.)

  84. It's partially the technology.... by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    At least around here, the systems are really crappy. In order to discourage shoplifting (or soemthing... havent really figured out the real purpose yet since it is so braindead to get around if you wanted to anyway), every item you scan has to be **weighed** by the checkout before you can scan the next item. This results in a horrible sequence of scan, put item in bag on weight sensor, wait 1-2 seconds for it to register, scan next item.

    If you have even just 5-10 items this makes the time going through the checkout take about twice as long as it should.

    Don't even get me started on the abnormally sized items that don't fit on the sensor, where you have to wait for the cashier supervisor to come muck with the machine....

    I really don't know what these systems are trying to prevent. If you wanted to steal something then why would you scan it? If you scanned it then you already paid for it, who gives a f*ck if it's in a bag on the sensor? Are they trying to keep people from sneaking stuff into the bags or some crap? What's to stop you from just grabbing a bag and shoving stuff in there?

    It's really retarded and a huge waste of time IMO.

    1. Re:It's partially the technology.... by plover · · Score: 1
      I really don't know what these systems are trying to prevent. If you wanted to steal something then why would you scan it?
      Yes, the bagging area is a giant scale that's supposed to read bags of concrete with milligram precision.

      The problem is there's no limit to the items that you can take through self-checkout. If you had three tiny $50 carbide tipped router bits in your hand, waved your hand over the scanner and dropped them all in the bag, you'd be stealing $100 worth of stuff, and to the casual observer it looks like you just did a normal thing -- you waved your hands, the scanner beeped, you dropped something in the bag, $50 rang up, everything looks cool. But the scale can detect the overage.

      It also prevents you from peeling the barcode from an $0.89 plumbing fitting and pasting it on a $40.00 gate valve. Again, you scan a plumbing item and a plumbing-like line appears on the display. From a distance, it all looks above-board. But the scale knows the difference between an elbow and a valve.

      You could take a boxed package like a toilet tank, hide all the plumbing fittings inside the box, and scan just the box. But now the box is overweight, and the scale detects it.

      The problem as far as the honest customer is concerned is that same scale that has to detect 50 pound bags of concrete has to also detect when you've dropped a tiny poly bag with three rubber O-rings in it. It's very difficult to build a scale with that kind of precision over that kind of range.

      --
      John
  85. They'll fix it by jmv · · Score: 2, Funny

    more stores transition from human clerks to self-service checkout technology, thus reducing the time shoppers spend in line and under the temptation of impulse items

    Don't worry, soon you'll be waiting forever in line just to go through the self-service checkout

  86. And difficult to use your own bags, too. by dmatos · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's what bugs me the most. I have cloth shopping bags so I don't have to keep throwing out those horrible plastic sacs that always rip on the way home. Is there any reasonable way to bag while you're scanning? No. I have to stack the items on the scale, then when I've paid, pack them into my bags. Can't put the bag on the scale (Please remove unauthorized item), can't place items into bag on the floor (Please place your item in the bag). Most of my shopping is done by bicycle, so I just want to throw everything into my backpack or panniers.

    This is just one of the reasons (that loud, annoying voice is another) that I won't use the self-checkout if I'm buying more than two items. In fact, I also lodge complaints about them with the cashiers and store managers while I'm at it. Not that it makes any difference, I'm sure. *sigh*

    --

    It may look like I'm doing nothing, but I'm actively waiting for my problems to go away.
    --Scott Adams
    1. Re:And difficult to use your own bags, too. by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Those plastic bags are great for using as trash bags in your car (hang it off of the stick shift) or for small trash can liners. I also use them as trash bags while backpacking so I don't end up with a dusting of hot cocoa powder or mac & cheese mix all over the inside of my pack.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    2. Re:And difficult to use your own bags, too. by dmatos · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm not arguing that a couple of them can come in handy, but I don't need a dozen fresh ones each week. Plus, if I'm packing everything into a backpack or cloth bag anyway, having it all in those plastic bags makes it much more awkward to do so. All it needs is a "tare" button that can be pressed before scanning the first item. Or, replace them all with human cashiers again.

      --

      It may look like I'm doing nothing, but I'm actively waiting for my problems to go away.
      --Scott Adams
    3. Re:And difficult to use your own bags, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might work if you put your bags on the scale before you press the "Push here to Start" button on the screen. The scales are zeroed at that point as near as I can tell - at least at my local Kroger.

    4. Re:And difficult to use your own bags, too. by PayPaI · · Score: 1

      I take my own bags all the time, I use them to collect my items before I hit the self checkout. At the self checkout, I just put the items on the scale in front of the plastic bags, and after I pay just pick them up and put them back in my bag. Works great.

  87. Easy fix: by hotani · · Score: 1

    Obviously there just aren't enough ads in the self-checkout screens!

  88. glad to hear it. by sgt+scrub · · Score: 0

    Anyone rude enough to replace people that low on the pay scale deserves to have the self check out machines crammed up their ass and the hole sewn shut. Anyone using the self check out machines deserve all the hassle that comes with it, should be given 10 lashes in the parking lot, and a pay cut.

    --
    Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
  89. Re:They'll just add more machines to distract/amus by Larus · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of the colorful interactive screens at WalMart gas pumps that keep blasting me with the great deals of the day when all I want is to tank up. I have to suppress the urge to graffiti the bright LCD screens, short-circuit the happy shopper music, slam the gas nozzle through the self-help clean-engine additive dispensers, douse the credit card application signs with liquid fire, etc. Nope, I can't do that since I may want to return for the cleap gas, and thus... *sigh*

  90. The time saved is your discount by TonyGreene · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If there are lines at the cashier lines, an available self-checkout, and I have only a few simple items, I'm going with the self-checkout. I count those 5-10 minutes (and the associated aggravation) as part of the price I pay to get things from that store. Okay, so I'm impatient. I don't lash out, I mind my own business, and I make choices about where & when I shop with both my impatience and finances in mind. There have been plenty of times when I spent a little more for convience.

    One thing I'm definitely not going to do is stand in a long line in order to "force" the store into giving discounts for self-checkout. My time is more valuable to me than that.

    --Tony

    1. Re:The time saved is your discount by pkbarbiedoll · · Score: 1

      My time is more valuable than that. I'll opt for the human-powered checkout lanes. Why are we so obsessed with eliminating jobs in this country???

  91. So...who's doing the self-checkout...and Octopus? by fataugie · · Score: 1

    Really, when you have to try and figure out how to operathe the freakin thing, do you really have time to scratch your ass and contemplate buying a snickers bar and the latest "Brittany Spears Screwed An Alien" tabloid?

    No, you're trying to figure out how to negotiate that self serve scanner without setting off the "I'm too fucking stupid to run this thing alone" alarm.

    --

    WTF? Over?

  92. It doesn't scale. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That system works well at stores where you're buying perhaps five items at most, and those items are small, like books or video games. It just doesn't scale up to grocery stores or Wal-Marts, where people have shopping carts and larger items. They'd need far more space to queue all the shoppers, and it would be quite difficult for some shoppers waiting at the single queue near Checkout 1 to see that Checkout 24, over 150 feet away, is free.

  93. Re:So...who's doing the self-checkout...and Octopu by gameboyhippo · · Score: 1

    I was once a Wal-Mart cash associate. Yeah, I hated the thing. I was responsible for making it sure it worked all the time, but Windows would constantly crash on the thing. How do you explain to customers why their self check out machine broke?

  94. Faster self-checkout? Yeah, right! by garylian · · Score: 1

    Seriously, have you ever tried to use the self checkout in a Wal-Mart? There are several problems bound to happen.

    #1, some fat housewife in a housedress just brought 2 grocery carts full of stuff to each self checkout before you got there.

    #2, those that actually observe the "20 items or less" that most self checkouts have, can't dial a telephone, much less figure out how to use a self checkout.

    #3, the store employees that are there to assist those people using the self checkouts are as dumb if not dumber than most of the customers trying to use it.

    #4, there is always some problem with "you failed to place that item in a bag" that keeps cropping up when you buy items that don't weigh very much.

    #5, produce and other items that don't come with barcodes throws customers for a loop.

    Wal-Marts are by and away the worst for this. And it isn't just the retards that have trouble operating it, but they do seem to come out of the woodwork to use the self checkouts. Folks that look like they actually have a few operating brain cells tend to get flumoxed by them. (Can you tell I live in an area that has a lot of folks living under the poverty level????)

    Self checkouts will never replace good cashiers that know how to scan items. I worked at a grocery store for 11 years, and the company I worked for had a goal of 100 scanned items per minute. It sounds hard as hell to beat, but the good cashiers could accomplish that easily if they had someone bagging for them, and many could do it even if they were bagging for themselves. It comes from repetition and the eventual autmoatic knowledge of where the barcode is on each product, and how to move it across the scanner to pick it up. They also know all the codes for produce by memory, so they don't have to look anything up.

    As a customer, I'd rather have a good cashier ring me up than spend the time fighting with those stupid self checkouts. I'm so sick of a bag of potatoe chips and other light weight objects making me press extra buttons to say "ignore bagging" and the like.

    Albertsons has been playing with a "scan the item(s) as you put them in your cart" method, and has hand-held scanners at the front of the store for customers to use. Where I live, nobody ever touches them.

    I don't know about you, but I power-shop when it comes to groceries, and my wife loves to follow that model. I don't want to be spending an eternity waiting to check out. And that's what I see in the self checkout lines.

  95. Re:So...who's doing the self-checkout...and Octopu by fataugie · · Score: 1

    Shit...that's easy.

    "YOU BROKE IT!
    What did you DO?"

    There, problem solved. Balme the customer. 8 out of 10 people will beleive you and feel like it's thier fault. The other 2 will punch you in the mouth. The trick is to pick out the two and just shrug your shoulders and walk away from them.

    Good Luck!

    --

    WTF? Over?

  96. License to Steal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's something most never even thought of. Many of the Self-Checkout systems have no provision for accepting cash and once a store goes completely over to the self checkout setup I can then legally leave with my selected goods due to their refusal to accept Cash, which in the U.S. is legal tender to cancel all debts.

    So if they only accept plastic, then I have legal grounds to walk out of the store with what ever I want as they've refused to accept the U.S. Currency that by law cancels the debt between us and as I don't believe in plastic of any kind (no store membership cards, debit/credit cards) they'll have a problem with me as I'll certainly do my best to increase their costs.

  97. My phobia by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    I have xenotriskadecatechnophobia. The fear of 13 foreign robots.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  98. Re:Breaking Unions is priceless [OT] by vrai · · Score: 1

    Bank owned ATMs in the UK provide free balance/withdrawal services to customers from other banks, and the banks still have human tellers in their branches. Note that no law was passed to force this - it was in response to widespread public outcry over charges. Obviously the stand-alone ATMs (the kind you get in corner shops and pubs) still charge fees to everyone - but then they are provided as a money making scheme, rather than a service to bank customers.

  99. yes but... by Garabito · · Score: 1

    did you have to walk in the snow both ways?

  100. Mystery solved! by LunaticTippy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Here is how it happens:

    They cost less to install.
    Management doesn't use self-checkout.

    --
    Man, you really need that seminar!
  101. cutting error from 20% to 2% by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Given their are five things than have to work correctly for each self-transaction: scannable tag, correct price, correct weight, correct discount, correct clerk intervention- I had early error rates approaching about one per item. After a few years I'm happy if I can get through 10-20 itesm with one or two errors now.

  102. ...this is why I shop at Trader Joe's now!!! by flipmack · · Score: 2, Insightful

    a few years ago here in Southern California, all of the major grocery/supermarket chains had their unions go on strike...which resulted in MONTHS of long lines. the result of the strikes? the unions got to keep their jobs, get more benefits, not fire anyone, AND have the self-checkout counters made available. SO, less work for the union folks but with the same if not more benefits. a LOT of people became angry because of this...so many more people decided to find other non-union grocery chains, i.e., Trader Joe's. The funny thing is that it's actually CHEAPER to shop at Trader Joe's, the people who work there are nice and helpful, and the food is healthier, granted, the selection is limited. Nowadays, *IF* I ever have to step inside a union-staffed grocery store, even if I buy just a pack of gum, I'm going to make a checker scan it for me...and I'll insist that someone bag it. if you're going to strike for months and cause a big uproar, then you're going to check my single item and bag it.

    --
    semper ubi sub ubi
  103. Boo hoo by ukemike · · Score: 1

    Perhaps you would like some cheap Walmart cheese to go with your cheap Walmart whine? If your 5 mintues of time is soooo valuable that you feel you shouldn't have to wait in line like everyone else then perhaps you should try this time saving measure... Go to the grocery store 1 time a week for 45 min instead of 7 times a week for 15 min each.

    --
    -- QED
    1. Re:Boo hoo by tuzzyfoad · · Score: 1

      5 minutes? man, I would love to know what walmart you go to that has only a 5 minute wait time. If I'm *very* lucky I'll spend about 15 minutes standing in the "express" lane at walmart.

  104. Reminds me of a certain vending machine by Moraelin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A long time ago, in a galaxy far aw... err... a few years back, when Germany's currency was still the DM, I remember using a vending machine in a railways station. And getting a Polish 10 Zloti coin instead of a 1 DM as part of the change. The coin was remarkably similar to 1 DM in size and weight.

    The difference between the two was bigger than between the yen and cent, though. A DM was (later) worth half an euro, while the 10 Zloti... well, let's just say that the difference between 1 DM and 10 Zloti was 1 DM :P

    I'm guessing whoever it was did it more than with that one coin, since pretty soon all vending machines in town had been tweaked to the point where they routinely rejected genuine 1 DM coins too. They swallowed any other coinage just fine, but 1 DM required several tries and some of the 1 DM coins just didn't work at all any more.

    Now I don't know what actually happened there, but my favourite wild uninformed guess (or conspiracy theory, if you will) is that it was done so they'd reject the 10 Zloti coins. Unfortunately the difference between them was so small that it also rejected some of the real coins.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  105. Produce, Fred Meyer... by tholomyes · · Score: 1

    * A lot of complaints about these systems, and, yeah, the one time I've used them at Wal-Mart they were kinda fucked up. But I use these regularly at Fred Meyer (a northwest chain) and the machines they have work pretty damn well, other than they need the volume turned down a bit. I'm a big fan of these because I don't often get a large amount of groceries and I'm a fidgety, impatient person that never buys more than 1 or 2 packs of gum on impulse per year anyway. * Produce. A lot of comments about problems keying in produce. I always thought the system was pretty good: there's a sticker right on the produce with a little 4-digit number. Just hit "produce", type in that number, and away you go. What's the hassle?

    --
    When did the future switch from being a promise to a threat? -C. Palahniuk
  106. Wait Wait by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    You made an 11 year career out of RETAIL?

  107. Wow by baalz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm amazed at the vitriol coming out of all the geeks on this one. I guess a lot of people have had really bad experiences, but I would have expected interprising. I tell you what though, I love the self scan lanes BECAUSE of the fact that they are a little clunky and you have to learn how to use them. Why is that? Because 9 out of 10 times there is no line at all - its like having my own reserved lane and I figured out a long time ago how to work it. You just have to be smart enough to know when its the right tool for the job. You don't want to go there with your fully stuffed grocery cart (let the professionals handle that scanning) or stuff you know it has problems with (why in the hell would you try more than once to buy washers on one of these?), but if you're just buying a couple things for dinner, or just stopped by to get that box of nails you needed they make the perfect express lane.

  108. How can you live? by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    Health Insurance is not cheap.

    1. Re:How can you live? by flipmack · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      yes, it's not cheap...and because it's not cheap, maybe checkers and baggers should stop depending on their unions for insurance and start looking at a better job with room for growth and better pay so they can afford the health insurance.

      don't be a dummy and join a union so you can get health insurance. you do realize that the union is just passing the cost of health insurance on to the consumers, right?

      --
      semper ubi sub ubi
    2. Re:How can you live? by v3xt0r · · Score: 1

      I think (err, hope) he was being sarcastic as to the quality of the 'healthy' food at Trader Joe's.

      You do know that all their fish and meats are farm-raised?

      Did you also know that in most fish farms, the fish feed on their own poop?

      I've heard case after case of people (I know) getting food poisoning from their Salmon, and/or Chicken. I even remember a recall of quacolmole due to some bacterial fungus, about 2 years ago.

      I hope you have Health Insurance! =)

      --
      the only permanence in existence, is the impermanence of existence.
    3. Re:How can you live? by feed_me_cereal · · Score: 1

      So... all checkers and baggers should get different jobs? How exactly do we continue to run grocery stores if this happens? Face it: these jobs have to be filled by someone, and everyone deserves some sort of healthcare. Since the government and the employers won't help, all that's left are unions. I don't like it either, which is why I like the idea of public healthcare.

      --
      "Question with boldness even the existence of a god." - Thomas Jefferson
  109. not oblivion... ASIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "There is no money flowing into oblivion as your analysis would suggest. "

    No, it goes to Asia, and into the pockets of overpaid CEOs. They're making billions specifically because more and more workers are making little to nothing at all. There are more billionaires because there is a much smaller middle class and larger poor class in America now. That, and Asia, is where that money is going.

    They hire more R&D people OVERSEAS to create newer technologies further increasing efficiency

    Pay out more dividends to a handful of ultra rich investors and lucky employee stock plan holders

    Open new stores (and thus hire more people again) - using the cheapest (read: immigrant) labor possible

    Expand/Renovate existing stores (employing new labor in form of construction and additional store personnel) - again, hiring the cheapest labor possible

    Bonuses to big wigs *gasp* *shock* *horror* - Okay... so then they either invest in stocks, deposit in banks, or buy something... all of which put the money back into circulation - money which is, for the most part going out of the country. Investing in stocks doesn't mean workers get paid more. Swelling bank accounts don't mean more tellers. Automation can handle all of that.

  110. Economics of self-checkout don't make sense by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    In my experience, every self-checkout setup requires one employee to watch 4 scanners. I find it difficult to beleive that an experienced cashier isn't at least 4 times faster at running a bar code scanner than a rank amatuer... so wouldn't that employee be better utilized running a register? Plus, they now have 4 times as much equipment to perform the same job! The only reason I can think of to implement this system is to start training customers now for the day when all purchases will be rung up via RFID as you attempt to exit the store.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  111. More visits by kooshvt · · Score: 1

    I was never an impulse buyer while waiting in line so they are not losing any money on me using the self checkout. However, I do find myself going to the grocery store more often now. Usually I would just stop by some convenience store on the way home if I needed just one item like a bag of chips or a bottle of soda. Yeah it may have cost a little more but it was worth it not having to deal with the amount of time it would take to get in and out of the grocery store. The cost for convenience was justified in my mind. Now the grocery store has greatly improved the convenience factor since I can be in and out in no time now. They may be selling less impulse items but, at least from me, they are selling more regular items.

  112. Re:They'll just add more machines to distract/amus by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    Uh, Albertson's already has an LCD monitor with video and audio at every checkout register (except for the self-checkout)... it might be a little late to patent that idea!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  113. On the topic of bad ATM design.. by gregmac · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why don't they make the card readers have a magnetic stripe reader in BOTH SIDES? There are so many people (including me) that get it backwards, or even just spend a few seconds looking at it trying to decipher which way the picture is showing to slide the card. Every machine has a different picture, and sometimes the pictures are so bad that it's impossible to tell anyways, or even after you study it, you get it backwards.

    Of course, the other way to solve the problem is to put a magnetic strip on both sides of the debit card.. but I haven't seen that done yet either.

    --
    Speak before you think
    1. Re:On the topic of bad ATM design.. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Of course, the other way to solve the problem is to put a magnetic strip on both sides of the debit card.. but I haven't seen that done yet either

      I'd settle for consistent sinage. They have a picture of the front, or the back, on either side. Just have half white and half black, the black for the back and the white for the front. Or any of a billion ways of doing it that would be better than how it's done now, then have people standardize on it. I can flip a card, but I have to know where the front is and where the back is. The smartcard idea was great. The readers were more likely horizontal, rather than vertical, and you always did it with the face up. That's unscrewupable. At least the swiper/PIN-pads at the stores now are more likely horizontal for the magnetic strip readers. Those are almost all top-in face-up readers. Nice and simple.

  114. those coinstar machines are replacing banks too! by Comsn · · Score: 1

    you should see the coins, bullets (new and spent), jewlery, and all manner of things wind up in there.

    my friend works at a grocery store and its always a race after someone dumps a lifetime collection of coins in there to grab the 'rejected' coins.

    most people just throw out the rejected coins in the trashbasket too...

  115. I appreciate it sometimes by fishbowl · · Score: 1

    Generally, I hate the way the self-checkout systems work. I've seen them from a couple of vendors, and there seems to be one dominant player.

    Anyway, it is really nice to be able to check myself out with certain varieties of items that I would prefer not to share with anyone, store clerk, or other customers.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  116. This comment is useless... by Blaede · · Score: 1

    ....without real details about this magical $16/hour cashier job, and where it's at.

  117. Re:So...who's doing the self-checkout...and Octopu by gameboyhippo · · Score: 1

    Even better. I can ask for $10 as bribe money not to tell management that they broke the expensive all mighty self checkout machine.

  118. Thank you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The line for the self-checkout was over a dozen people long, as was the line at the one open cashier.

    Too bad the mods have left. The folks above didn't mention that Home Depot has ONLY ONE HUMAN CASHIER LANE OPEN at a time - at least during the week!

  119. Another Way to Reduce Human Contact! by iwsnet · · Score: 0

    These self-service lanes are just another way to reduce human contact. Since many people go online now and bank from ATMs, why bother talking to some human cashier?

  120. Just like buying computer eqpt. online, by Percent+Man · · Score: 1

    In time, the tree of touch-screen menus through which one must navigate in order to reach the "Shut up, I'm ready to pay now" button will include such intermediate screens as:

    "Would you like to add a 2lb bag of M&M's to your purchase? YES/NO"
    *no*
    "Would you like to add a tin of TrendyMints to your purchase? YES/NO"
    *no*
    "Special! This week only! See the explosive secret that shocked Hollywood - as celebrities' nightmares come true! Read it now in CelebMag, only [SPECIAL PRICE!]$7.83 with your existing purchase! YES/NO"

    Combine the already-extant technologies of pervasive customer-preference tracking and vending-style dispensing of your impulse buys, and their revenue streams jump right back up, and the only price paid is the infuriation of the customer who just wants to buy his bloody breakfast cereal and leave.

  121. I don't do "self checkout" by kimvette · · Score: 1

    I refuse to use self-checkout "services"

    If you want me to ring up my own order, give me a damn discount for it, otherwise I'll go to a clerk and ensure that at least one American can keep a job for a day.

    Now to answer your question based on my comment above:

    Self-serve pumps for gasoline? Yes, I use those for my car because I don't want some slob scratching up my car but when driving the trucks I don't give a flip about the paint as long as it protects the steel from rusting, so I go full serve then. There is actually a benefit to doing the work yourself when paying someone else for the privilege.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  122. No retail markup is !00% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Retail markup is figured as a percentage of the price at which it is offered. So inherently there is no such thing in retail as 100% markup. If cost is 60 cents and the item sells for $1 the retail markup is 40%. This of course makes the retailer look less greedy when he sells that lighter he gave 10 cents for at $1 making it a 90% markup.

  123. I refuse to use 'em by sm62704 · · Score: 1

    If I'm going to do the checkout clerk's job, then damn it I want his paycheck. At least with gasoline self service was cheaper! This way the clerk loses, the store wins, and you get... what, an extra fifteen seconds?

    WTF are you going to do when ALL the checkouts are self service? You think the wait is bad now!

    I'll tell you what I'LL do - I'll cuss you for using them in the first place.

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  124. Congratulations by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    You've just touched on the second* best reason for the Iraq war. Nothing spurs an economy like wartime. FDR knew that, too - it's not a D/R thing. Sadly, it's growth based on debt, and the US is racking it up quite quickly.

    *The first is, of course, to avenge the stalemate Sr played into with the senior psycopath. If you want to talk terrorism, let's dicuss Afghanistan; if you're into WMD, we should have paid just a wee but more attention to N. Korea.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  125. Please take an econ course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Increasing efficiency _increases_ the output of the economy, as scarce resources (e.g. cashiers) are freed up to perform other work. And self-checkout will increase the efficiency. Assuming that this has a significant cost impact (and nobody would bother if it didn't), prices will fall as competition between retailers drives prices down due to reduced cashier costs.

    The trouble is, you'll never connect the fact that your weekly grocery bill over the next year declines from 98.43 to 97.23 due to the increase effiency of the new system, because the drop will phase in (or more likely, be masked by inflation). You'll only grumble that you are swiping your own groceries instead of staring off into space while poor schlepp has to scan them for you.

  126. Not all suck by ChaosDiscord · · Score: 1
    I think there is hope in this area. I deal with two local stores that have added self-checkout lines. My local grocery store's system is reasonably intelligent and by and large Just Works. It's a little slower than I'd like, but it's responsive enough that I don't get frustrated. Whoever designed it caught a number of the little details: if you start scanning without picking a language, it just picks english as the most likely one; if you insert cash it assumes you've pressed the "I want to pay" and "Pay with cash" options. The machine gets confused maybe 1 visit out of 10, and when it does the cashier tending the four machines is usually prompt is fixing it. When all of the human-run lines are full self-checkout is much faster, especially for small purchases. End result: the machines get reasonably heavy use. During their most busy times I'm pretty sure it's speeding checkout for everyone.

    On the other hand, my local ShopKo's self-checkout system is a pathetic joke. It's painfully slow. It doesn't get any of the little details right. Every single time I used it I hit some problem that requires cashier intervention. End result: they're always empty.

    Good systems are possible and it appears customers have no tolerance for bad systems. Things will eventually improve all round.

  127. RFID washers? by RamblerRandy · · Score: 1

    Imagine hardware parts like those 5 cent washers with RFID chips on them! Or other items where it can be knocked or worn off while packing & shipping to the retailers!

    Costs will go up to make RFID work! Hardware better for manual counting by clerks. Groceries are for RFID!

    --
    I'll think of a really good SIG just before I die.
  128. Re:When does hydrogen-powered toy story II come ou by AGMW · · Score: 1
    ... probably tomorrow or Friday, but on closer inspection you'll see it's just a dupe of HTS-TOS with "II" added in crayon.

    --
    Eclectic beats from Leeds, UK
    handmadehands.co.uk
  129. Re:Here comes Godwin by everett · · Score: 1

    And I'm sure all those Jews sitting around in Auschwitz and Buchenwald that had their lives made shittier suffered so that some great societal change could be made?

    The civil rights movement affected change because BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS were being denied. If I was being told, you have to wait in this really long ass line because your white, and all the people of asian, african and latino descent can use this reallly fast checkout system over here, then maybe we'd agree on something. However this is about checking-out at the grocery store, and people protesting the "dehumanizing" self-checkout machine. Find some other cause to champion hippies, they haven't legalised pot yet. Start there.

    --
    Sig withheld to protect the innocent.
  130. Re:They'll just add more machines to distract/amus by syousef · · Score: 1

    it might be a little late to patent that idea!

    What just because there's that pesky prior art? That never stopped anyone with buff lawyers :-)

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  131. Re:Here comes Godwin by evilviper · · Score: 1
    The civil rights movement affected change because BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS were being denied.

    I was making a point that letter-writing campaigns (your solution) are completely useless at affecting change. No other relevance intended.

    But keep the tin-foil hat nice and shiny...
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant