Slashdot Mirror


Sodium + Private Lake = Fun

travisbean writes "This should be enough to pique your interest. Add to the story that the guy has his own pond and I think we can all see where this is going... 'The first step was the procurement, through eBay, of three and half pounds of solid sodium metal for about a hundred dollars. This is a decent price for a small quantity like this. Small being a relative term: It's used by the ton in industry, but anything more than a few grams is a dangerous quantity if found in your home. Three and a half pounds is enough, for example, to blow your home to bits under the right conditions.'"

614 comments

  1. Awesome by SexyKellyOsbourne · · Score: 5, Funny

    Too bad he couldn't afford Cesium or Francium!

    1. Re:Awesome by evilrunner · · Score: 5, Funny

      Too bad Francium has a half life that is something on the order of a few milliseconds. Cesium on the other hand could explode if it was exposed to humid air. Sounds like Darwin at work to me.

      --
      "I've figured out what's wrong with life: It's other people." -Dilbert
    2. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Francium is a liqud at room temp and radioactive. You would need to get a little more serious to handle it.

    3. Re:Awesome by wandernotlost · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ah yes. Reminds me of when I used to read alt.cesium, back in the day. Wonderful stories of Cesium and swimming pools and other bodies of water. The conjecture of all the great possibile combinations of Cesium and everyday products (like condoms - for explosive sex!).

      Such fond memories.

    4. Re:Awesome by Megane · · Score: 5, Interesting
      He does have some Cesium. It's sealed in a glass vial which he keeps in a locked compartment in the Periodic Table Table, along with two gold coins (because it was easier than putting a lock in Au as well. He thinks that if the glass were to break, there would be one hell of an explosion.

      It's a good thing I read the PTT site a few days ago linked from the IgNoble Awards, because it's slashdotted all to hell now. If it weren't for that, I'd provide you with a link to the Cesium page.

      As for Francium, I think I got to read the page for every element he had, and I don't seem to recall him having any. Some of the cool stuff he did have was some Lite Salt (NaCl/KCl mixture) which was measurably radioactive (!) because of a certain amount of natural Potassium is radioactive, and a Fiestaware bowl (which used Uranium as a dye) which was significantly radioactive and for which he made a cast lead bowl in which to store it.

      A little bit of trivia: more than a few of the Wolfram Research folks have purchased samples of Tungsten. Why? Tungsten's symbol is W, representing its name in German: Wolfram.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    5. Re:Awesome by Galahad2 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, if he had some Francium, he probably doesn't have it anymore. The most common type has a half life of only 21.8 months (that's 223Fr, 221 and 212 have halflives of 4.8 months and 20 minutes, respectively). Not to mention that he would probably be able to knock "cancer" up a few notches on the ol' "What's probably going to kill me" list, and rule out any prospect of having children. Well, children that don't glow in the dark and are less than 60 feet tall, anyway.

    6. Re:Awesome by p3d0 · · Score: 1

      "Samples of tungsten"? Why not just buy a light bulb?

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    7. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      He probably does not have a pure sample of Francium, even though it can be found in nature, because it is short lived. Its longest lived isotope is Fr-223, with a half-life of about 22 minutes.

      Francium naturally occurs because Uranium-235 has a long half life (7*10^8 years), and it can decay per: U-235 => Th-231 => Pa-231 => Ac-227 => Fr-223 => Ra-223 => etc.

      That is the only significant source of Francium in nature.

      On the other hand, although the only Plutonium and Technetium on Earth are manmade, he could in principle have samples of these elements, since they have isotopes with reasonably long half lives.

    8. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The most common type has a half life of only 21.8 months (that's 223Fr,

      Heh-heh-heh-heh-heh. Surely you mean "21.8 minutes," Galahad2. :-)

      Seriously, it's an understandable mistake. But it is most unusual for a scientist to measure time in months, because different months have different lengths!

    9. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More trivia: the name tungsten derives from the Swedish name "tungsten" meaning "heavy stone". However, the name actually used in Sweden is the German name - "wolfram" (no capital letters in Swedish). Why?! Who knows? I don't know.

    10. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      break open a light bulb some time and grab the filament. Tungsten filaments are extremely thin. you'll probably break it in your fingers.

    11. Re:Awesome by packeteer · · Score: 5, Informative

      Sodium wont explode in humid air but it will burn... it makes it hard to put out too when adding water makes it EXPLODE.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    12. Re:Awesome by Gordonjcp · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ah-ha. And what does Francium throw off when it decays? Hm, let me check. Looks like it throws off alpha particles. It's unlikely that they would get out of the glass phial containing the Francium, and even more unlikely that they'd get through the fabric of his trousers. Thin tissue paper stops alpha particles.

    13. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Tungsten story is pretty funny... "tung sten" is Swedish for "heavy rock". In Sweden on the other hand it is called Wolfram. (BTW, there's a reason for naming the periodic element W, English people! ;-)

    14. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Californium - $68,000 per milligram!!! Hard as you have to have a lot of plutonium and uranium to make it given that it doesnt exist in nature

    15. Re:Awesome by sowellfan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You can get tungsten rings here.

      http://www.r8w.com/trewtungstenwo.html

      I almost got one for my wedding ring, but ended up buying a titanium ring. The one with the 22 karat gold looks especially nice,
      I think.

    16. Re:Awesome by dattaway · · Score: 2

      Or just go to your local welding supply or hardware store and buy a few pounds of TIG welding rods. Be sure to get the ones that aren't the tungsten/thorium alloy. They often add radioactive thorium to the tungsten to increase its longevity.

      Pretty cool to see a radioactive warning on items at the hardware store...

    17. Re:Awesome by Some+Guy · · Score: 2, Funny

      This made me chuckle when I looked at the FAQ:

      What if a Trew Tungsten ring gets stuck on your finger, can it be safely removed if necessary?

      ...
      If pulling doesn't work, TrewTungsten rings are engineered to be safely and easily removed in case of emergency. Click here to view the recommended removal procedure as written by Dr. Stanley Hajduk and published by the Annals of Emergency Medicine in June of 2001. Note: You may be eligible for a full replacement if you submit the ring parts (including the serial number) and proof of removal by an emergency professional along with your warranty.

    18. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is this world coming to when normal citizens can acquire such dangerous materials as these kinds of elements. Isn't access to such material regulated heavily by the government? The consequences of having everyday people having access to this stuff is too high. Normal citizens shouldn't be allowed to access anything higher than say.. Aluminum or Iron on the periodic table for their own good.

    19. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "because of a certain amount of natural Potassium is radioactive"

      I'm naturally* radioactive...
      You are too!

    20. Re:Awesome by jeblucas · · Score: 4, Informative
      Thin tissue paper stops alpha particles.
      Actually, your skin is thick enough to stop alpha particles. Barring ingestion, inhalation, or puncture wounds, pure alpha particle radiation poses almost no risk to your health. That said, if you do inhale some, it is far more damaging than beta or gamma.

      The lab I used to work in used Fiestaware (the orange U-238 containing type) to test our detectors. Fiestaware is relatively safe, the only worry being if you scratched the surface with your fork or knife and ingested some of the slivers.

      If you just want nuclide information and decay chains, I have to recommend this site.

      --
      blarg.
    21. Re:Awesome by gorilla · · Score: 3, Interesting

      One isotope of Francium (223Fr) has a half life of 22 minutes. It's still the most unstable of the first 103 elements though.

    22. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As the story goes...

      When our high school moved to the new building, one of the teachers was cleaning out the science lab (over 100 years old) and he found a sealed container labelled CS with a liquid inside.

      Needless to say, they evacuated everyone in the school and the bomb squad came in and disposed of it.

      It was probably some prank which lasted years, but no one is really sure except for, I guess, the bomb squad.

    23. Re:Awesome by operagost · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you have to use a Type 4 fire extingusher - not a standard piece of equipment.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    24. Re:Awesome by rabidcow · · Score: 3, Informative

      Where did you check?

      "Francium's most stable isotope, francium-223, has a half-life of about 22 minutes. It decays into radium-223 through beta decay or into astatine-219 through alpha decay." source

      In all three of the most stable isotopes, alpha decay is less likely than beta decay for the first step, and if you look at the decay trees here, you'll see that you are pretty much guaranteed to get some beta decay someplace along the line.

    25. Re:Awesome by actifed · · Score: 0

      Sodium Water ?????? Profit!!!

    26. Re:Awesome by ebh · · Score: 2

      OK, before everyone runs off to Macy's to buy some uranium to eat your Crunch Berries out of...

      Fiestaware containing uranium hasn't been produced since the 1950's. The stuff you get today will provoke less of a reaction from your geiger counter than the dust bunnies under your bed (which pick up radon from your basement).

    27. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A little bit of trivia: more than a few of the Wolfram Research folks have purchased samples of Tungsten. Why? Tungsten's symbol is W, representing its name in German: Wolfram.

      Now what is real interesting about that, is that "Tungsten" is a Norwegian word (they have it in Danish and Swedish too), meaning Heavy Rock, but still we Norwegian say Wolfram, not Tungsten.

      Do not ask me why.

    28. Re:Awesome by jeblucas · · Score: 1
      The stuff you get today will provoke less of a reaction from your geiger counter than the dust bunnies under your bed
      Huh? The half-life of U-238 is 4.5 billion years. If the plate was "hot" in the 50's, it is "hot" today.

      If it's not setting off your Geiger counter it's because Geiger counters are poor alpha detectors. Unless the sensor has an extremely thin sleeve, the alphas will never make it to the avalanche plates.

      Fiestaware is an extremely popular collectible. The color you want is burnt orange. Happy hunting.

      --
      blarg.
    29. Re:Awesome by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2

      Fair enough, that does look like beta emission is a bit more likely. However, it doesn't take much to shield against beta particles either. A 2mm aluminium plate will stop beta, iirc.

    30. Re:Awesome by quarterbooty · · Score: 1

      There is no tungsten in a "TIG" rod. TIG (Tungsten Inert Gas) welding or more properly known as Gas Tungsten Arc Welding (GTAW), refers to the tungsten tip in the welding torch. The rod itself will be of a filler metal dependant on the base metals you are joining.

    31. Re:Awesome by creative_name · · Score: 1

      You could also use Mineral oil. That's what a lot of Sodium is stored in.
      Well that and shakers..of course, that's only when its with Chlorine ;)

      --
      Posting as directed.
    32. Re:Awesome by Mikeytsi · · Score: 1

      Uh, I think he was referring to stuff you could buy in the store, made in present day, hence the "Macy's" remark.

      --
      I've been called a "Fucking Dick" by better people than you.
    33. Re:Awesome by SEE · · Score: 2

      Actually, there's a place in Gabon where plutonium was created naturally and on Earth two billion years ago -- the .

    34. Re:Awesome by SEE · · Score: 2

      Er, that is, the Oklo natural reactor.

    35. Re:Awesome by masterkool · · Score: 1

      Cigarette smoke produces alpha particles. Tests of aplha detectors were nearly of the scales when put to a cigarette. Here is another link to a site about radioactive cigarettes.

      I dont know if this has allready been stated, but Alpha particles are just helium nuclei with the electrons stripped off. They travel in particle form and get stopped by most objects. I think tissue paper was even mentioned in this post. Its beta particles (free electrons) that are the risk. They travel in wave form and penetrate through the object leaving damage. If you do get some alpha's on you, they can easily be washed away, thusly averting the damage.

      --
      I once shot a man who posted too many, "Imagine a beowulf cluster of these"
    36. Re:Awesome by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      The wrong shielding (heavy) on beta radiation gives off X-rays due to bremsstrahlung.

    37. Re:Awesome by Galahad2 · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, you're correct. All of my measurements are in fact minutes. I don't know why I said two were months and one was minutes, since all the measurements from my book had the letter "m" next to them. Weird.

    38. Re:Awesome by packeteer · · Score: 2

      Because i only know a little abotu sodium can you explain what a Type 4 fire extingusher is? I assume it uses some type of oil to suppress fire but where COULD you get one of these?

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    39. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd heard about natural reactors, but I didn't realize that plutonium can still be found there. According to the article you indicate, there really is a detectable amount there.

      Surely none of it is Pu-239 (which can be made from U-238 via neutron capture) since about 70,000 of its half lives have passed after this reactor stopped operating about 1.7 billion years ago.

      For Pu-244, 21 half lives have passed since then, so one out of 2 million atoms would still be around. I don't know enough nuclear physics to judge how easily Pu-244 could be produced, but it is seems that it could be possible.

  2. Nothing like fun with Sodium... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...in a freshwater pond. Hope there weren't any fish living there ;)

    1. Re:Nothing like fun with Sodium... by matto14 · · Score: 0

      I think you meant WERE any fish in there

      --
      SCREW FLANDERS
    2. Re:Nothing like fun with Sodium... by AntiNorm · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hope there weren't any fish living there ;)

      Give a man a fish, you feed him for a day. Give a man a block of sodium he can fish with, you feed him for life.

      --

      I pledge allegiance to the flag...
      of the Corporate States of America...
    3. Re:Nothing like fun with Sodium... by ameoba · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hrmm... a larg enough block of Na tossed into a lake would essentially make a large pool of lye.

      Na + H20 = Lye + stuff
      Explosion + fish = dead fish
      dead fish + lye = lutefisk

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    4. Re:Nothing like fun with Sodium... by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      Give a man a fish, you feed him for a day. Give a man a block of sodium he can fish with, you feed him for life.

      Not a very impressive trick, considering his life span will be measured in hours at that point....

    5. Re:Nothing like fun with Sodium... by spinwards · · Score: 2, Funny

      I like this one myself:

      Light a fire for a man and keep him warm for an hour
      Light a man on fire, and keep him warm for the rest of his life.

    6. Re:Nothing like fun with Sodium... by manofherb · · Score: 1

      unless he drops it from a plane or helicopter....shit this is how we could get saddam, find some ho's looking for a sugar daddy, make them take him swimming, and then drop the shit in his pool while the ladies go to the bathroom.

    7. Re:Nothing like fun with Sodium... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Feed him for life? Certainly. Throwing three and a half pounds of sodium metal into a lake should give you a life expectancy of a few seconds, maybe minutes, so you won't actually need any fish. Will the prepetrator kindly arrange for the video of his demise to be forwarded to the Darwin Awards for posting on the net?

    8. Re:Nothing like fun with Sodium... by ScottKin · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      What planet are you from? Practically every set of laws and morals tha we have on this lump of rock we call Earth is derived from laws received from Deity(God) thousands of years ago from 10 laws carved into two slabs of stone - they're call the 10 Commandments, my friend.

      Killing is wrong ("Thou Shall Not Kill")

      Taking what is not yours is wrong ("Thou Shall Not Kill", "Thou Shall Not Covet", "Thou Shall Not Commit Adultery").

      Most of the laws that we have are based on the desire to protect life, liberty, freedom and property - every law that isn't directly related to those two concepts is eventually related to them in some fashion or another.

      The old and tired "Harm No One" that all of the wiccan/new-agers want to hang on to is way to simplistic for a modern society. For example, does "harm" deonte pain - and if it is, is a painless death or murder ok if you didn't "Harm" the person?

      Ignoring Deity(God) or not believing in the existenct of God does not mean that God does not exist.

      Two people were discussing this very topic, and one said to the other: "I don't believe in God because I don't see any hard evidence of his existence". The other person spoke to the first and said "Do you see this fine watch I'm wearing? Do you see the watchmaker when you see it?" The first person said "No...", to whit the second person sait "Then how do you know the watchmaker exists, without seeing him or having proof of his actual existence?" The first person then said "Well, I know that someone must have made this watch, because watches don't just automagically come into existence". The second person then said: "So, you're trusting information given you about the making of watches, but you're not willing to trust information given to you about the Creating of Worlds and who or what caused this World to be created - how odd!!!"

      Your supposed model of a "true moral system" is pure fantasy, because people are not all the same, they have different desires and motivations, and some of them are are, for the most part, going to do things that will break what ever "moral code" you create in this "utopia" that you eluded to.

      You sound like a passe` Marxist.

      Enjoy the Ride!

      ScottKin

      --
      I don't give a rat's behind about "karma" here or anywhere else. Don't like what I have to say here? Deal with it!
    9. Re:Nothing like fun with Sodium... by BluBrick · · Score: 5, Funny

      Lutefisk? Is that something like this?

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
    10. Re:Nothing like fun with Sodium... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Equally, believing in God does not mean that he does exist. The only intellectually defensible position in this argument is that of the agnostic.

      The evidence to support a fairly conclusive theory of watchmaking is somewhat easier to acquire first hand than that for a theory of the creation of the universe.

    11. Re:Nothing like fun with Sodium... by Gorm+the+DBA · · Score: 1
      The correct response to that conjecture is "Yes, because I see evidence of Watchmaking before my eyes, and if I take the instructions given in the Watchmaking manual and follow them correctly, I will end up with a watch. Your so-called-God has not left any reproducible evidence of his existence or that his methodologies for creating a World work...therefore alternative theories have credence as well"

      You are correct, however, in that there is no inherent "moral system" in Man. There is, however, an inherent desire (in most people) to exist in Societies, and societies tend to exist on the basis of "don't harm me, and I won't harm you", which provides the basis for rules forbidding murder, theft, and a whole raft of other things.

      Self-Interest works really, really well...religion...well...not so well.

    12. Re:Nothing like fun with Sodium... by Pinky · · Score: 5, Funny

      Give a man a fish, you feed him for a day.

      Feed a man for life and he'll go out throw a big block of Sodium in the lake and kill all the fish just to watch is go fiiizzzzzzzzz.......

      Moral: Men like things that go fizzzzzz more than fish.

    13. Re:Nothing like fun with Sodium... by cheeseSource · · Score: 1

      The above comment is obviouse flamebait but enticing nonetheless. The watchmaker analogy is dead in the water especially when you consider evolution, or the fact that "God" would have been making pretty crappy "watches". So much for not planning ahead. What's most interesting though is that you pick a particular "God" when there are plenty of others out there that precede aforementiond deity with rule sets and all. In a nut shell it's just a matter of people creating something, giving it whatever attributes they like, and then turning around and saying that that something gave all those attributes to the people. It's a sad sort of neurological disorder really.

      --
      (Sponsored by cheeseSource for President 2012)
    14. Re:Nothing like fun with Sodium... by thomas.galvin · · Score: 3, Funny

      1. Nothing
      2. ???
      3. CREATION!!!

    15. Re:Nothing like fun with Sodium... by thomas.galvin · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      The correct response to that conjecture is "Yes, because I see evidence of Watchmaking before my eyes, and if I take the instructions given in the Watchmaking manual and follow them correctly, I will end up with a watch. Your so-called-God has not left any reproducible evidence of his existence or that his methodologies for creating a World work...therefore alternative theories have credence as well"

      I cannot get a bunch of sand and make my own computer chips. Since these so-called chip-manufacturers have not left any reproducible evidence of their methodologies, I must assume that computer chips are the result of random reactions in nature.

      Take a look around, friend. Everything you see is evidence that there is a God. Once, there was nothing, and now, there is everything. Physical laws cannot explain this, but the bible can. And no, He didn't leave a "Creating Worlds for Dummies" book laying around; he's God, which means there are things He is capable of that we are not, and that He understands things that we do not.

      As for alternative theories, it basically ammounts to this. There is a God, or we got really, really lucky. The strength of the atomic forces, or gravity, the distance of the earth to the sun, and a whole host of other values are tuned for the existance of life. Some of these values, if altered by a thousandth of a percent, would have gaurenteed that the universe would have imploded into a fireball, or drifted away into nothingness. But here we are.

      Self-Interest works really, really well...religion...well...not so well.

      When people lost religion, they lost morality, pure and simlple. You are correct, however, that when religion became state-sponsored, trouble followed closely.

      Self interest gives us Enron. State-sponsored religion gives us the Inquisition. God, on the other hand, gives us such hard-to-swallow concepts as "don't go around killing each other" and "feed the poor."

    16. Re:Nothing like fun with Sodium... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When people lost religion, they lost morality, pure and simlple.

      The majority of people have not got the integrity or the energy to devise their own morality; their own values for actions and things do not exist ab initio.

      Good luck with your communal neurosis....

    17. Re:Nothing like fun with Sodium... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? but... Why? but...

    18. Re:Nothing like fun with Sodium... by monkeydo · · Score: 1

      You mean:

      Light a man a fire and keep him warm for an hour.
      Light a man afire, and keep him warm for the rest of his life.

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum
      The only thing more annoying than a Libertarian is an (un|mis)informed Libertarian
    19. Re:Nothing like fun with Sodium... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Self-Interest works really, really well...religion...well...not so well.


      What a silly, silly statement.

      Self-Interest, when applied in a way that looks at long range consequences has been demonstrated to work well.

      Self-Interest, when applied in a way that only takes immediate gratification into account has been demonstrated to make a real mess of things.

      Religion has been demonstrated at different times to be benificial or detrimental (depending on how it is practiced)

      If you only count "good" Self-Interest (self interest that has good results) as "real" Self-Interest then yes, Self-Interest has good results. I could play the same word game with "real" Religion to the same end. It proves nothing.

      +

    20. Re:Nothing like fun with Sodium... by cerberusti · · Score: 1

      Actually, there is a Darwin Award given because of some Cesium (same effect as Sodium but more so).

      --
      I'm a signature virus. Please copy me to your signature so I can replicate.
    21. Re:Nothing like fun with Sodium... by Dirtside · · Score: 2
      I know this is a troll, but I just can't resist. It's like having someone drop a jar of Jelly Bellies in your lap.
      Take a look around, friend. Everything you see is evidence that there is a God.
      Please explain exactly why "everything" is evidence of God. I see stuff here, but there are natural processes which explain it all rather well, so why postulate a sentient, all-knowing, all-powerful, undetectable deity?

      Also, if you are correct, then God is responsible for *everything* -- including the Ebola Zaire virus, Stalin's murder of twenty million of his own citizens, babies who die of genetic diseases, and "Survivor: Thailand."

      he's God, which means there are things He is capable of that we are not, and that He understands things that we do not.
      You keep saying that. Can you prove that God even exists?
      As for alternative theories, it basically ammounts to this. There is a God, or we got really, really lucky. The strength of the atomic forces, or gravity, the distance of the earth to the sun, and a whole host of other values are tuned for the existance of life. Some of these values, if altered by a thousandth of a percent, would have gaurenteed that the universe would have imploded into a fireball, or drifted away into nothingness. But here we are.
      For all you know, there are infinite alternate universes, each of which has a random set of fundamental values. The universes which happen to be able to support life, due to their combinations of values, are the universes in which life arose, and in which we are here to think about it. That explanation is at least as plausible as God (read: equally unprovable).
      When people lost religion, they lost morality, pure and simlple.
      Since you define "morality" as "having religion," your statement is basically tautological. You may as well have said, "When people lost religion, they lost religion." However, since I consider what I have to be morality, and since I also have no religion, your statement is false. Isn't language a wonderful thing?
      Self interest gives us Enron. State-sponsored religion gives us the Inquisition. God, on the other hand, gives us such hard-to-swallow concepts as "don't go around killing each other" and "feed the poor."
      Actually, men gave us those concepts. They just claimed it was a God, so that people would listen to them.
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    22. Re:Nothing like fun with Sodium... by Floody · · Score: 1

      I cannot get a bunch of sand and make my own computer chips. Since these so-called chip-manufacturers have not left any reproducible evidence of their methodologies, I must assume that computer chips are the result of random reactions in nature.

      Flawed logic. Given the correct elements (some of which may or may not come from sand), procedures and equipment, one can in fact manufacture computer chips. The reason this is so is that reproducible evidence, which you claim does not exist, actually does.

      I'm attacking your belief system, only your logic.

    23. Re:Nothing like fun with Sodium... by Sunda666 · · Score: 1

      actually, believing in some god is what makes it exist... if noone believes, there is no such god.

      (makes sense? i dunno)

      Cheers.

      --


      ``If a program can't rewrite its own code, what good is it?'' - Mel
    24. Re:Nothing like fun with Sodium... by thomas.galvin · · Score: 2

      Flawed logic. Given the correct elements (some of which may or may not come from sand), procedures and equipment, one can in fact manufacture computer chips. The reason this is so is that reproducible evidence, which you claim does not exist, actually does.

      I'm attacking your belief system, only your logic.


      Quite all right. The grandparent poster said I that a watch was evidence of a watchmaker because he could follow a watchmaker's instructions and produce a watch, but since he could not follow God's instructions and make a world, creation was not evidence of God. I was merely pointing out that you don't have to be able to reproduce something for it to be true...chip makers can make chips, but I cannot. God can make worlds, but I cannot. Both are simply out of my power, but both have been done.

    25. Re:Nothing like fun with Sodium... by thomas.galvin · · Score: 2

      Please explain exactly why "everything" is evidence of God. I see stuff here, but there are natural processes which explain it all rather well, so why postulate a sentient, all-knowing, all-powerful, undetectable deity?

      Simply, there is no "natural processes which explain it all rather well." we can go back only so far, and then all of our theories and physical laws go out the window. Scientists believe that the universe, at one time, did not exist. Now, it, and everything in it, does exist, despite the fact that this "coming into existance" defies one of the fundamental theories of thermodynamics. There was once no matter, no energy. Now there is. Scientists have been trying to explain it for ages. Theologians explained it millenia ago.

      For all you know, there are infinite alternate universes, each of which has a random set of fundamental values. The universes which happen to be able to support life, due to their combinations of values, are the universes in which life arose, and in which we are here to think about it. That explanation is at least as plausible as God (read: equally unprovable).

      Fair enough. I agree that the "fundamental values" in our physical laws are not enough to prove God exists; but it is one more piece of evidence that helps build my case. It also ties in with the watchmaker example from a higher post.

      When people lost religion, they lost morality, pure and simlple.
      Since you define "morality" as "having religion," your statement is basically tautological. You may as well have said, "When people lost religion, they lost religion." However, since I consider what I have to be morality, and since I also have no religion, your statement is false. Isn't language a wonderful thing?


      I overgeneralized. I have known some people who were, by human standards, good people, and also happened to be atheists. Society as a whole, however, has become increasingly less moral as it has become increasingly less theistic.

      Self interest gives us Enron. State-sponsored religion gives us the Inquisition. God, on the other hand, gives us such hard-to-swallow concepts as "don't go around killing each other" and "feed the poor."
      Actually, men gave us those concepts. They just claimed it was a God, so that people would listen to them.


      Actually, God gave us those concepts. Men just claimed it was their idea because they don't want to admit there is a higher standard than themselves.

    26. Re:Nothing like fun with Sodium... by Gorm+the+DBA · · Score: 1
      And actually you missed my point.

      Given the materials necessary to create a watch, as listed in an instruction manual for watch creation, and the manual dexterity necessary to follow the instructions, a watch can be created.

      According to the Bible, the materials necessary to create the Universe are...nothing.

      The process isn't documented or reproducible...sorry, but God doesn't even qualify for SEI level 1...which explains rather a lot.

    27. Re:Nothing like fun with Sodium... by thomas.galvin · · Score: 2

      According to the Bible, the materials necessary to create the Universe are...nothing.

      Actually, according to the Bible, the materials necessary to produce a Universe are...God. Science has yet to come up with anything better.

    28. Re:Nothing like fun with Sodium... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not so much if it is a solid cube. The water will only react with the exposed surface area of the sodium. You want a really big bang, you'll need a porous block of sodium which exposes the most amount of surface area simultaneously to the water.

      Bonus points for whomever comes up with the optimal swiss-cheese pattern for a block of sodium to produce the best explosion. Or would it be better to press it into one large sheet? It doesn't seem like a shower of sodium dust would produce one big explosion.

    29. Re:Nothing like fun with Sodium... by Dirtside · · Score: 2
      Simply, there is no "natural processes which explain it all rather well."
      They're called "the laws of physics." And they explain it better than your explanation, which is, "We don't know, therefore God did it." That's known as intellectual laziness. Isn't sloth a deadly sin?
      we can go back only so far, and then all of our theories and physical laws go out the window. Scientists believe that the universe, at one time, did not exist.
      "Scientists," eh? Which scientists, exactly? There's quite a lot of them out there, and there is nothing even remotely close to a consensus about the origins of the universe, if indeed it has any (that's another hypothesis).
      Now, it, and everything in it, does exist, despite the fact that this "coming into existance" defies one of the fundamental theories of thermodynamics.
      So you're attacking a particular claim, which is that the universe sprung into being from nothingness? Such a claim is far from uniform in the scientific community, and I personally don't have any opinion about the origins of the universe. Why? Because it doesn't matter.
      There was once no matter, no energy. Now there is. Scientists have been trying to explain it for ages. Theologians explained it millenia ago.
      Theologians came up with an explanation, but no proof or evidence for it. It's called the "god of the gaps" argument -- basically, we don't know what did it, so it must be God! I can come up with an equally valid explanation: It was not God, but rather giant sentient purple flamingos that created the universe. I can't prove myself right, but then again, you can't prove me wrong, just as you can't prove yourself right about God, and neither can I prove you wrong.
      Fair enough. I agree that the "fundamental values" in our physical laws are not enough to prove God exists; but it is one more piece of evidence that helps build my case.
      It doesn't support your argument, and it doesn't support my argument either. In fact, it's an entirely moot point. The very nature of reality may be such that the values cannot be other than they are; or, as I suggested, there might be infinite (or at least highly numerous) universes in which the values are different; or it might be that any set of values works; etc. However none of this can ever be proven, since we cannot run experiments to find out. We're limited to this universe, so anything either of us can say on the topic is entirely conjectural.
      It also ties in with the watchmaker example from a higher post.
      The watchmaker example is absurd. If you find a watch on the beach, you assume someone made it. However you don't assume that it is the first watch ever created. You assume that there were earlier versions of the watch that did not work so well, and earlier versions still, until you get all the way back to the sundial, or earlier. Ironically, the watchmaker argument ends up supporting evolution!
      I overgeneralized. I have known some people who were, by human standards, good people, and also happened to be atheists. Society as a whole, however, has become increasingly less moral as it has become increasingly less theistic.
      So now that we've abolished slavery, given women the right to vote, desegregated our schools, mostly given up on corporal and capital punishment, and realized that illness is not caused by demons but rather by germs (most of which are results of becoming less theistic), we're less moral? (And did it ever occur to you that the phrase "increasingly less" is kind of silly?)

      And even if your contention about the relationship between theism and morality is true, whether or not believing in God makes you a nicer person has absolutely nothing to do with whether God exists! There have been people who believed in non-Christian Gods, and who were nice people as a result, but that doesn't mean their God therefore exists. In fact, this entire thread is spurious. Whether God exists is unaffected by what people believe, or how good they are as a result of what they believe.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    30. Re:Nothing like fun with Sodium... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh sure, I open the source to the Universe and suddenly I'd have a whole bunch of script-mortals finding all the wormholes, exploiting matter overruns, violating causality, and rooting the Universe!

      Don't make Me have to apply the Service Pack with its new Terms of Subservience!

    31. Re:Nothing like fun with Sodium... by Rone · · Score: 2
      a larg enough block of Na tossed into a lake would essentially make a large pool of lye

      My great uncle claims to have done this once, but no one in the family believes him.

      Every time he brings it up, the rest of us call him a lye-er.

    32. Re:Nothing like fun with Sodium... by spike+hay · · Score: 2

      dead fish + lye = lutefisk

      Finally!!! I will have lutefisk supplies unlimited by my meager finances!!

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
    33. Re:Nothing like fun with Sodium... by BlueFashoo · · Score: 1

      There is a God, or we got really, really lucky.

      Really, really lucky is about odds. Given a large enough universe and enough time, say, 14 billion years, just about anything could happen, even life. As for the values bit, any universe where these values, if altered by a thousandth of a percent,, would not have us to wonder why the universe, or world, fits us so well. Similar to how a puddle would wonder, if puddles could wonder, how the depression it rests in fits it so well.

      --
      Nice Marmot
    34. Re:Nothing like fun with Sodium... by jimbolaya · · Score: 2

      I don't mean to carp on the man, but I think the whole idea was lutefisk! An interviewed asked him why he did it, and he replied, "Just for the halibat!"

      --

      There ain't no rules here; we're trying to accomplish something.

    35. Re:Nothing like fun with Sodium... by lazarius · · Score: 1

      When people lost religion, they lost morality, pure and simlple.

      The majority of people have not got the integrity or the energy to devise their own morality; their own values for actions and things do not exist ab initio.

      Personally, I like paraphrasing Jesus for this kind of thinking ...
      Jesus was asked one time (by I think one of the priests, but I could be wrong) whether the Samaritans, who did not have the Law if they could get into Heaven.
      Guess what Jesus said? He said that the Samaritan who has lived as a good person (by definition of the Jewish Laws) has a better chance of getting into Heaven than a Jew who has not followed the Laws.
      Why did he say that? Because if you can be a person without being told, it doesn't matter if you know how to live your life or not. Moral: be a good person. That's it. There's no more to do.

      MIKE

      --
      Beware the JabberOrk.
    36. Re:Nothing like fun with Sodium... by Lectrik · · Score: 1
      blockquothe the post-it:
      Society as a whole, however, has become increasingly less moral as it has become increasingly less theistic.


      unfortunately Society has, as a whole, also become less capable of riding horses
      and less supersticious
      and less skilled at using a slide rule
      and less capable of looking up and correctly guessing what tommorows weather will be like
      and much less able-to-shoot-beams-of-heat-from-their-eyes.

      Correlation != cause & effect

      So come join us, here in the lovely hills of florida where men are men, women are women, and small blue hairballs from alpha centauri are small blue hairballs from alpha centauri.
      --
      --- As to make my comment seem, by comparison, more intelegent... doodie doodie doodie poop poop poop!
  3. Now that's why we have eBay. by perfessor+multigeek · · Score: 2, Funny

    Mmm. Now I'll have to get my own stockpile. Heh, heh, heh.

    --
    Data is the lever, rigor the fulcrum, brains the force that drives it all.
  4. Imagine... by nizo · · Score: 4, Funny

    duct taping this sodium to people who post "imagine a beowulf cluster of these" posts, and throwing them in a lake.

    1. Re:Imagine... by davidstrauss · · Score: 4, Funny

      Image a beowulf clu.....

      **Boom**

      No Carrier

    2. Re:Imagine... by gooberguy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Imagine duct taping this sodium to people who post "imagine a beowulf cluster of these" posts, and throwing them in a lake.

      Now imagine a beowulf cluster of THOSE!

      D/\ Gooberguy

      --


      Karma: Meh (Mostly from meh.)
    3. Re:Imagine... by davidstrauss · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      It's permanently burned into my memory from my days on AOL.

    4. Re:Imagine... by Ignominious+Cow+Herd · · Score: 1

      Why would you want to connect a bunch of Dead, Wet, Duct-tapped people together with Ethernet?

      Boggles the mind.

      --
      Lump lingered last in line for brains, and the ones she got were sorta rotten and insane.
    5. Re:Imagine... by UTPinky · · Score: 1

      But can you get it to run linux?!?

      --
      I'm only paranoid because everyone is against me...
    6. Re:Imagine... by acceleriter · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      ATS11=35 S13=35
      OK

      ATDT 5551212
      BUSY

      A/
      BUSY

      A/
      CONNECT 1200

      Those were the days.

      --

      CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

    7. Re:Imagine... by Idarubicin · · Score: 2

      Save some for the people who mention 3. Profit!!!

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    8. Re:Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3) Profit!!!

    9. Re:Imagine... by radiashun · · Score: 1

      ahh yes... trying to get my modem to work with linux back in the day was really fun :-/

      at one point it seemed like i knew more about my damn modem than the engineers who designed it.

    10. Re:Imagine... by Dr.+Nonsense · · Score: 1

      One word: Matrix.

      Okay, so that needed live people, but close enough. :P

    11. Re:Imagine... by jshare · · Score: 1

      S11 was the "pause between tones", right?

      But what was S13?

      *google google google*

      http://www.acl.co.uk/modem.htm
      http://www.fesb.hr/~zblaz/AT_commands.htm

      Nope, seems to be reserved. Perhaps it was specific to your modem?

      The coolest thing involving Hayes AT commands was the "+++ATH0 ping exploit". That thing is freaking hilarious.

      Jordan

    12. Re:Imagine... by Bush+Pig · · Score: 0

      In a few decades _lots_ of stuff will be gone from my memory - a combination of alcohol and senility.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    13. Re:Imagine... by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      Hell yeah, as is:

      POKE 53280,0
      POKE 53281,0
      POKE 646,1
      PRINT "GOING BYE BYE"
      SYS 64738

    14. Re:Imagine... by Archfeld · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I don't even have a modem in a machine anymore. I've got an old external in the closet in case both of my broadband connects go belly up at the same time, hardly likely. My nephew has never used a computer with a modem in it period.

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    15. Re:Imagine... by richie2000 · · Score: 2
      CARRIER LOST WITH ALL HANDS STOP

      I had that one as logout message on my BBS back in the old days.

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    16. Re:Imagine... by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 0

      Wouldnt that be a Beowolf ClusterBomb?

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    17. Re:Imagine... by ninthwave · · Score: 1

      Ouch that hurt,
      haven't had to poke or peek in a while.

      I miss the 6502 and 6510.

      --
      I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said: "I drank what?" - Chris Knight (Val Kilmer)- Real Genius
    18. Re:Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What was 646?

    19. Re:Imagine... by adolf · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Naah, these were the days:

      Me, a sysop in Ohio, trying to dial in to a friend's BBS in Florida, and finding it busy. Since I had S11 cranked down to 11 or 12ms (or whatever the fastest speed the phone company was capable of processing that week was), I was redialing like mad (God bless Supra for mailing me, -free-, firmware which supported such insane speeds), and with the busy detection also cranked down to just-barely-reliable periods, I was redialling like mad.

      After a minute or two, instead of the usual touble-tap busy signal, half-second silence, and a rapid-fire redial, I heard prolonged silence and then a slight click.

      Strange, I thought. I let the machine continue to redial.

      After a few more minutes, the same thing happened again: no busy signal, no ringback, just dead silence.

      I quickly exited to a terminal, picked up a phone, typed ATX3D, and hung the phone back up. I heard the modems negotiate and connect.

      The guy in Florida, who thought he was calling a local BBS, was instead connected (at my expense) to my Telemate session..

      We talked for a bit in Telemate's split-screen chat. He was obviously quite surprised to find me typing to him from Ohio when he thought he was calling a BBS across town. I told him how to fire up his WWIV BBS using the existing connection, without dropping carrier, and we talked for a bit more using WWIV's superior (and still un-matched) split-screen chat before I checked for new files and logged off.

      Those were the days.

    20. Re:Imagine... by adolf · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      scratch that. ATX3D should read ATA. Indeed, how AT commands fade from memory...

      Now I feel like a senile old man, instead of just clever grown-up kid. :-/

    21. Re:Imagine... by frog51 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Or my all time favourite - the 6809. I remember when I used to write so much assembly code for the 6809 I ended up thinking and writing my apps directly in Hex. The only bugger being the calculation of offsets for branch instructions:-)

      I wonder if that filled my brain up? I need some excuse for being as thick as mince now.

    22. Re:Imagine... by Doug+Neal · · Score: 1

      Why not?

      Might while away an otherwise dull Wednesday afternoon.

    23. Re:Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you don't sound like a senile old man or a clever grown-up kid. You sound like a dork.

    24. Re:Imagine... by Sn4xx0r · · Score: 1

      Carrier Lost: a naval aviators worst nightmare. (unknown)

      --
      Got brain?
    25. Re:Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      speak for yourself - BBS, AT commands, and 9-cent-per-minute long distance was the poop.

    26. Re:Imagine... by Pinky · · Score: 1

      Wow... I have had the same sort of experience...

      Someone calls.. no one at the other end... type ata. and bingo, some guy with a modem who got the wrong number. It happened quite often for some reason. I expect my number was one off from a local BBS.

    27. Re:Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It could be that my memory is fading, but I thought S11 was the duration of the tones, and S13 the time between tones on my particular modem. I can't find documentation to substantiate that, though.

    28. Re:Imagine... by tzanger · · Score: 1

      In an earlier life I was 2:282/601.4

      1:221/[somethingIcan'tremember].77

    29. Re:Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why change the border color, background color and font color if you're just going to reboot anyhow?

    30. Re:Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      646 was text color, 1 is white.
      poke 646,1 = text color white

    31. Re:Imagine... by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      Hell yeah, as is:

      Hmm...

      ]POKE 53280,0

      ]POKE 53281,0

      ]POKE 646,1

      ]PRINT "GOING BYE BYE"
      GOING BYE BYE

      ]SYS 64738
      ?SYNTAX ERROR

      ]

      POKEing stuff into ROM or into the keyboard-input buffer tends to not do much...

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    32. Re:Imagine... by Capt.+DrunkenBum · · Score: 1

      1. connect a bunch of Dead, Wet, Duct-tapped people together with Ethernet?
      2. ???
      3. Profit!!!!

      --

      Not everyone deserves a 320i

    33. Re:Imagine... by qqtortqq · · Score: 1

      It was EASY to get modems working with linux back then... No winmodem idiocy to deal with, just real modems with real chips.

    34. Re:Imagine... by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      Wrong system - this is meant for the Commodore 64.

      53280 - border colour
      53281 - center screen colour
      646 - text colour
      64738 - soft-reset the system

      And no, I didn't look it up. Heh. :)

    35. Re:Imagine... by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      _Somebody_ was paying attention! ;)

      Mod this dude up...

      Damn I miss the C64. Thank goodness for emulators for when my system finally kicks.

    36. Re:Imagine... by Swaffs · · Score: 2

      Well, you asked for it...

      --

      --
      "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." - Homer Simpson [1F10]

    37. Re:Imagine... by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      Wrong system - this is meant for the Commodore 64.

      Figured it might've been a Commodore of some sort, but since I never had one, I couldn't have confirmed it...my mid-80s computer upgrade was from a TI-99/4A to an Apple IIe, and the schools (where I was, anyway) were stocked with Atari computers of various sorts. I knew a few people (including my grandfather) who had CoCos, and I ran across a few other machines here and there, but for as common as they supposedly were, I knew nobody who had a Commodore.

      (Now watch this thread turn into a "my computer's better than yours" flamewar...:-) )

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  5. I've always wanted to do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've always wanted to do this. I have a lake behind my home and well, lots of free time. I was trying to find a way to extract the sodium from tablesalt but couldn't think of anything (anybody know?). I guess I should have checked eBay first :)

    1. Re:I've always wanted to do this by Catskul · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you melt salt then apply a voltage to the liquified sodium it will split into sodium and chlorine.

      --

      Im not here now... Im out KILLING pepperoni
    2. Re:I've always wanted to do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You could dissolve table salt into a solution, then using electrolysis, have the sodium ions goto the negative terminal, and the chlorine ions toward the positive.

    3. Re:I've always wanted to do this by bmwm3nut · · Score: 2, Informative

      this is no good for the lake...when the sodium reacts with water it makes hydrogen (where the explosion comes from) and sodium hydroxide. so you're basically polluting the lake with a strong base (think draino). i wouldn't want to be a fish or a plant in that lake.

    4. Re:I've always wanted to do this by Praeluceo · · Score: 4, Informative

      1) Take your table salt, about 100 lbs of it.
      2) Break the ionic bonding between the Cl and the Na (heat of formation being 395.5 kJ/mol) by heating it (2650907.2831789 moles) with 10.48E8 kJ.
      3) You then end up with Na+ + Cl- (ish), and can use electolysis to combine them back together.

      In conclussion, buy it off eBay, extracting sodium from salt is not a DIY project.

    5. Re:I've always wanted to do this by kryptkpr · · Score: 1

      I'm not chemist (but I am taking some chem classes), but would that not make Chlorine GAS?

      2Na(s) + Cl 2(g) -> 2NaCl(s)

      I assume you want to do that reaction backwards, are you so sure that's a good idea? Chlorine gas is nasty stuff.. it's why Blech has so many warnings on it (it decomposes, giving off Cl 2).

      --
      DJ kRYPT's Free MP3s!
    6. Re:I've always wanted to do this by gordyf · · Score: 1

      No. Doing this will only cause the water to split, since water is much easier to electrolyze than salt is. You'd have to melt the salt (not dissolve, but melt with very high temperature) in order to electrolyze it.

    7. Re:I've always wanted to do this by Praeluceo · · Score: 1

      Sorry for replying to my own post, but I forgot #4:

      4) Your theoretical yield would be 254 lbs, which means I probably did one of my above calculations wrong, which means someone will post to correct me.

      Upon reading my post, lets try moving the decimal point over one, so you get 125090.728 moles of NaCl, which would yield (theoretically) 25.4 lbs.

      Yeah, that looks about right.

      (using an molecular weight of NaCl of 58.5 mol/g, and atomic weight of Na of 35 mol/g.)

      Ah well, I've always been bad at math, it still isn't a DIY though, it takes a -lot- of heat to do that. And Chlorine gas is erm, rather toxic, and something you don't want to be producing several pounds of.

      (;

    8. Re:I've always wanted to do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might accidentally discover acid

    9. Re:I've always wanted to do this by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      Would that not create harmfull chlorine gas?

    10. Re:I've always wanted to do this by sparrow_hawk · · Score: 1

      Actually, it should (in theory) create both chlorine gas *and* sodium, though the sodium may react with stuff in the air (water vapor, oxygen, etc.) before you get a large enough quantity to do anything with.

      I hereby disclaim any responsibility for craters caused as a result of my post...

    11. Re:I've always wanted to do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Link is broken for me. Suspect it might be humourous.

    12. Re:I've always wanted to do this by Gerry+Gleason · · Score: 2
      Aside from what someone else pointed out (that it's kind of like pouring drano in the lake), how would you do this without hurting yourself. Make a little boat and float it out there, then turn over or sink the boat? Once you got it 30-40 feet away, you could hit it with a hose to get thing started. I don't think the 'boat' would last long after that.

      Anyone know how if it would burn or explode in in these conditions (i.e. dumped in a lot of water, but not confined)? Would a chunk that large split up from the primary reaction? If it holds together I would expect a bubbling (and hot) reaction, and a hydrogen flame where the bubbles are coming up.

    13. Re:I've always wanted to do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      yes, it creates harmful Cl2 gas.

    14. Re:I've always wanted to do this by Mr.+No+Skills · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've only seen this with a few grams.

      If thrown on top of water it shoots around -- think of a rocket with no control. It may have melted a bit and broke apart (its a soft metal and melts at relatively low temperature), but it was inside a beaker and hard to tell. It happened fast and made a lot of smoke, smell, and noise.

      If you dump the water on top (sodium in a dry beaker, then pour the water on top) the compression of the water on top of the rapid reation causes enough pressure to break the beaker (or to break a normal Pyrex beaker, anyway). You want to wear eye protection, as the broken glass explodes with pretty good force, enough to break the skin of the students sitting in the front row. Then, the chemistry teacher gets fired.

      I think it would take a pretty small lake and a pretty big pile of sodium to substantially alter the pH of the lake. Guess it depends on how deep the lake is.

      --
      Sleep is for the Weak
    15. Re:I've always wanted to do this by xmldude · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sure it's a DIY. I did this in high school:

      1. get a few cups of table salt from mom
      2. borrow two propane torches from dad
      3. rig the torches to point at the top of the pile of salt
      4. cut off the end of an extension cord
      5. blast the salt for 5 minutes or so until you have a small clear pool of liqued salt
      6. plug extenstion cord in and stick leads into pool of salt
      7. start all over again because there is now liqued copper in the salt
      8. then remembering from high school chemistry that CL gas is probably not something you want to inhale, set up a fan
      9. whoohoo! after two tanks of propane you now have ~2 grams of sodium
      10. verify by thowing it in the garage sink
      11. explain to dad why the driveway has heat blisters

      easy :)

    16. Re:I've always wanted to do this by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 5, Informative

      For the curious, the melting point of NaCl is 804 degrees centigrade. Here's a link describing the process of procuring sodium from table salt.

      --
      The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
    17. Re:I've always wanted to do this by spectatorion · · Score: 0

      incorrect. the explosion comes from the oxidation of sodium alone. no hydrogen is necessary, it just happens to be present.

    18. Re:I've always wanted to do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, electrolyzing salt water gives you sodium hydroxide and chlorine gas.

    19. Re:I've always wanted to do this by bmwm3nut · · Score: 1

      nope....the oxidation of sodium is exothermic, and without the hydrogen it would just get hot. you need to have something to burn to get the explosion.

      Na + H2O -> NaOH + H2 + Heat

      H2 + Heat -> Explosion.

    20. Re:I've always wanted to do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, one way that its produced industrially is the electrolysis of molten sodium chloride. Not exactly the easiest thing to do safely on a small scale as a do-it-yourselfer.

    21. Re:I've always wanted to do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't see how that would work, because your home power supply will be AC. You would generate sodium at an electrode for 1/60th of a second, only to have it recombine with the chlorine you generate in the next 1/60th of a second...

    22. Re:I've always wanted to do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YOU'RE ALL MISSING THE POINT. Its bad for the fucking lake jerk offs, who cares what the chemical reaction breakdown is. rofl.

    23. Re:I've always wanted to do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      12. ???
      13. PROFIT!!!!

    24. Re:I've always wanted to do this by perfessor+multigeek · · Score: 2, Informative

      Back when I was a wee lad (well, a pyromaniacal wee lad) we kept sodium under a layer of oil. In other words, sodium metal can be stored and moved pretty effectively in a bottle of mineral oil. I seem to remember that the bottles were always the light-reducing brown ones but I remember not why.
      Sooooo....... you mostly fill a large-mouthed container (let's say an empty food-service multi-gallon can) with oil and drop your bottle of sodium into that. Dip the end of your tools into the oil and leave them for a while so that they are free of bubbles and then use tools to open the bottle and release the sodium into the open but big can. Drop the can (carefully) into the lake, where the oil will rise, the sodium will drop and KERBLOOEY!


      --
      Data is the lever, rigor the fulcrum, brains the force that drives it all.
    25. Re:I've always wanted to do this by SpryGuy · · Score: 1

      ...we have sodium gnomes??

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    26. Re:I've always wanted to do this by perfessor+multigeek · · Score: 1

      The spinning and jumping is called the Leidenfrost (sp?) effect and will happen any time you've got little bits of something sitting on a plane of something else with a big enough temperature range between them to cause one to create a vapor barrier. It's pretty much the same thing you see with water on a hot skillet.
      In high school I used to work in a bio lab (at NYU, not at our high school) where the staff was mostly very young and we had lots of toys. So we used to cool our tea by pouring in little bits of liquid nitrogen. If you did it right the stuff twisted around in a very satisfactory way as both were liquids with a significant skin (i.e. decent surface tension) and each would deform the other. Much fun.
      As for our local crazed science teacher he did his best demos with thermite. Wow. Only time I've ever seen something burn through asbestos. Also much fun.
      All of this talk is making me want to start cooking up happy juice and join the purple finger brigade
      Rustin

      --
      Data is the lever, rigor the fulcrum, brains the force that drives it all.
    27. Re:I've always wanted to do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make a little boat and float it out there, then turn over or sink the boat?

      Don't be silly. Just hurl it into the lake with your trebuchet. If the quantity of sodium is too small to hurl by itself, stick it to a brick, an old toilet, a pumpkin, or whatever else you happen to have on hand that's got some weight to it.

    28. Re:I've always wanted to do this by JesseL · · Score: 2

      You'll want to replace that extension cord with, hmm, maybe a car battery and jumper cables? AC from an extension cord won't get your electrolysis very far.

      --
      "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
    29. Re:I've always wanted to do this by GMontag451 · · Score: 2
      H2 + Heat -> Explosion.

      Technically, its H2 + O2 + Heat -> Explosion, but thats just nitpicking.

    30. Re:I've always wanted to do this by GMontag451 · · Score: 2
      You know, I thought about this in high school and decided that it would be a lot easier to get sodium out of lye than out of salt.

      Just do the reaction in reverse, 4(NaOH) + heat -> 2(Na2) + 2(H2O) + O2.

      I know that isn't exactly the reaction in reverse, but I couldn't think of any practical way to get the H2 back in, so I was hoping that reaction would work. Any actual chemists know if it will or not? You'd have to have some way of separating the water and sodium though.

    31. Re:I've always wanted to do this by lingqi · · Score: 2
      and there is a good reason why you can't. i mean, besides the 800 degrees (celcius) thing:

      Modern Downs cells operate at 25 to 40 kA and at potentials of 7 to 8 volts.

      good grief!! that's 300kW of power dissipated *IN THE DOWN CELL!* remember, this does not count the line loss (on the lines, of course) and power-supply's internal resistance...

      all in all, that's a lot of fscking current... granted, it's not on the order of 70-100kA like certain dangerous hobbies people keep -- but this is continuous current.

      _sigh_... I am huffing and puffing all over the place trying to get across how utterly impossible (at home) / amazing this is... but I think you really have to be an electrical engineer to appreciate its enormity.

      --

      My life in the land of the rising sun.

    32. Re:I've always wanted to do this by Alioth · · Score: 2

      It *IS* a DIY project - we did it in our chemistry lab. A bunsen burner, a crucible and suitable electrodes (that won't melt) are what's needed. You won't get a lot of sodium though.

      An easier (less heat required) way of doing it is to use salt solution, and a mercury cathode (you get sodium amalgam - the sodium is dissolved in the mercury).

    33. Re:I've always wanted to do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should have borrowed dad's dictionary instead, dumbass. One error per line, better than Taco!

    34. Re:I've always wanted to do this by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
      An easier way is to use calcuim carbide.

      I actually had to do a chemistry lab experiment one time that was specified in the course outline where we used calcium carbide chips and water (just mix them) to create acetylene and then find the best acetylene/air mixture to create the cleanest combustion.

      In other words, we had to create a bunch of acetylene gas and figure out the best way to make an impressive explosion.

      We called it the rain of death lab because with air-deficient mixtures you'd get a lot of partial and incompelte combustion and it would rain soot. The actual 'rain of death' was if you got one of the big-ass 5 L graduated cylinders, a while whackload of CaC2 chips and basically blew up as much acetylene as possible. BLAM!

      See also: Acetylene safety data

    35. Re:I've always wanted to do this by GlassUser · · Score: 2
      You want to wear eye protection, as the broken glass explodes with pretty good force, enough to break the skin of the students sitting in the front row. Then, the chemistry teacher gets fired.

      But we're not bitter at all!
    36. Re:I've always wanted to do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh the lake becoming a little bit more alkaline isn't going to hurt anything, in fact they add calcium hydroxide to some lakes to counteract acid rain.

    37. Re:I've always wanted to do this by nixterino · · Score: 1

      Yes, and I think the sodium hydroxide takes the gold off the fixtures when you do this in your Mom's new bathroom sink when you're a bored geek in high school! Or maybe I was doing a little reverse elctroplating...

    38. Re:I've always wanted to do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, since the chlorine will just float away as a gas, it won't matter that AC is used. Chlorine will float away from both leads, and sodium will be left.

    39. Re:I've always wanted to do this by fenix+down · · Score: 2, Funny

      My high school chem teacher tossed some sodium in the resivoir in my town. Now THAT'S pollution.

      Since it's a cool story, it was his last year before he was gonna retire, so he took 2 paper towel tubes, filled them up about 1/3 of the way with Na and stapled the ends shut, making something like one of those WWII grenades with the handles. Then he piled the class into his station wagon and this other kid's van, cruised down to the water, and hurled 'em in. The first one sank a little before the reaction really set in, so you basically got a huge steam/hydrogen bubble coming up, looking (and sounding) like a depth-charge. The second one wasn't as big, but it came apart as it hit, making lots of dancing fire, and little chunks of Na bouncing around on the surface.

      Most impressive of all, he managed to get us all back without anybody noticing. He rationalized screwing up the pH balance by saying he was just readjusting it to compensate for the acidity of drunken teenagers pissing in it.
      Oh, and this was 2 years ago, not the 50's throw uranium at your siblings era. He probably only got away with it by getting out of the state by the time the story got spread around.

    40. Re:I've always wanted to do this by rew · · Score: 2

      Just do the reaction in reverse, 4(NaOH) + heat -> 2(Na2) + 2(H2O) + O2.

      Nope. You get:

      NaOH (aq) + heat + H2O (l) -> NaOH (s) + H2O (g)

      i.e. you get a salt-like substance left over once you boil away the water.

      Roger.

    41. Re:I've always wanted to do this by GMontag451 · · Score: 2

      What happens if you boil NaOH (s)?

    42. Re:I've always wanted to do this by rew · · Score: 2

      What happens if you boil NaOH (s)?

      It melts around 319 degrees centigrade, and starts to boil around 1387. I think it's just going to boil and give you gaseous NaOH. (My table doesn't have an entry for boiling point if the salt desintegrates before boiling).

      But where were you going to put it in while it boils?....

      Roger.

    43. Re:I've always wanted to do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wasn't aware of a healthy Clorine gas.

    44. Re:I've always wanted to do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do HAVE to ask since you are. Is anal retentive hyphenated?

    45. Re:I've always wanted to do this by gordyf · · Score: 1

      Ahh, you're right.

      Oh well.

  6. And we wonder by TheOste · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why many of the fun toys are banned for sale on EBay... Quit making this stuf so public :D

    1. Re:And we wonder by Nuclear+Fr0g · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Well no one gets to see it cuz the site won't work, so it looks like you don't have to worry.

  7. He's a shoo-in by Zspdude · · Score: 5, Funny

    I bet the Darwin awards have already written up his exploits and are now just waiting....

    --
    What's in a Sig?
    1. Re:He's a shoo-in by TeknoDragon · · Score: 1

      didn't you know? the darwins are nearly all fabricated...

      a guy with weather baloons in a lawnchair? nope, I don't think so.

    2. Re:He's a shoo-in by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      he shouldn't have won, he should have died but he didn't, you should only win one if you moronically (and humorously) kill or sterilize yourself

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    3. Re:He's a shoo-in by Nykkel · · Score: 4, Interesting

      a guy with weather baloons in a lawnchair? nope, I don't think so.

      Snopes.com (an Urban Legends site) respectfully disagrees with you.
      Up, Up, and Away!

    4. Re:He's a shoo-in by TeknoDragon · · Score: 2

      crazy, there are however a few account placed in Seattle that my firends and I have never been able to find a published account of.

    5. Re:He's a shoo-in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      w00t, that was my 200th comment~Cyno01

    6. Re:He's a shoo-in by l810c · · Score: 1
      a guy with weather baloons in a lawnchair? nope, I don't think so

      Can't speak for the rest of them, but this happened. I've seen a bit on a tv show that talked about it once(tv, must be true ;)) that interviewed both the guy and an airline pilot that saw him and reported it.

    7. Re:He's a shoo-in by G-funk · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sorry mate, most of them are not fabricated, and many have links (usually meatspace newspapers and such, not URIs) for your verification pleasures.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    8. Re:He's a shoo-in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He probably won't get a Darwin, but now we all know the REAL reason he won the chem IgNobel.

    9. Re:He's a shoo-in by ShadowBlasko · · Score: 1

      Actually, I read recently that he (the balloon+lawnchair= WHY DID I DO THIS?? guy) did finally do himself in. The old fashioned way. (gun to the head or something like that, I do not recall the details). So, in a nitpicky sort of way, he is now eligible for the darwin award he so richly deserved.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order- Ed Howdershelt Via Tass
    10. Re:He's a shoo-in by Cplus · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually he just won an Ig-Nobel Prize last week for his periodic table table.

      --
      "Share your knowledge. It's a way to achieve immortality." -- Dalai Lama
    11. Re:He's a shoo-in by Sloppy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, we should ignore those blasphemous lies and have creationist awards instead.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    12. Re:He's a shoo-in by sg_oneill · · Score: 2

      He shot himself in the heart , the poor guy. It's a tragic end to a guy who really did do an amazing thing.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    13. Re:He's a shoo-in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      even weaker, I get "overrated" for having a default +1? spawning a thread of 20 posts?

      mod: are you trying to drive people away from slashdot or what?

  8. Their server by jsse · · Score: 5, Funny

    explode in the similar fashion within 3 minutes featuring by /.

  9. Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sodium Party
    Periodic Table home

    I'd read about, and heard stories about, throwing sodium into water. It's a classic thing chemistry students do in college, and based on the reports I have been able to find on the internet, they are often drunk at the time.

    While anecdotal evidence would suggest that many people have thrown sodium into the lakes and streams of the world, they have been reprehensibly lax in documenting the results. I could find no reliable, and I stress the word reliable, reports on what actually happens. What reports I did find were contradictory: As you will see, I now know why. The only videos I could find were of pathetic thumbnail-sized bits skidding about in a bowl. (Click here to see my version of this: It's really boring, trust me.)

    (A note on videos: All the videos on this page are in QuickTime format, and most of them require QuickTime V5 or better. You can download the latest version of QuickTime for Macintosh or Windows from http://www.apple.com/quicktime/download.)

    To do better than that, I decided I should produce a comprehensive online reference on sodium dropping, with documentation on the size and shape of the chunks, how thrown, and most importantly with videos of the resulting explosions. To do this, I held a Sodium Party. People brought chips and soda and we had a cookout.

    The first step was the procurement, through eBay, of three and half pounds of solid sodium metal for about a hundred dollars. This is a decent price for a small quantity like this. Small being a relative term: It's used by the ton in industry, but anything more than a few grams is a dangerous quantity if found in your home. Three and a half pounds is enough, for example, to blow your home to bits under the right conditions.

    Next I constructed a patented Sodium Release-o-tron:

    It was designed to be constructed in less than an hour using only things I already had lying around the shop, be very unlikely to go off by accident, and be unable to fail when activated. So far so good.

    Here's a picture of the first lump I loaded into it, in a preliminary experiment about a month before the party:

    Click here for a video showing how this lump was cut off of the main block: A wood chisel and some pushing is all it takes, because this stuff is very, very soft.

    And here's a picture of what happened when we pulled the string:

    Click here to see a video of this first explosion. (But only if you've got a fast connection, because it's not the best video by far: See below for much better ones if loading these takes time for you.)

    This chunk, about 50 grams, gave a surprisingly strong bang, especially considering that there was no containment and no intentional pre-mixing of reactive chemicals, at least one of which is normally a prerequisite for a sharp report.

    My theory is that it's a fuel-air explosion caused by mixing of the hydrogen gas with air, ignited a second or two later (as you can see in the video) by the heat that builds up in the sodium. The heating of the sodium acts as the time fuse needed to make any fuel air bomb work. This theory would imply that only a minimal shock wave should be transmitted into the water, since the explosion would be happening well above the surface, as the picture seems to show. Unfortunately that theory is not supported by the fact that the metal bucket was split at the seams, even though less than an inch of rim extended over the level of the water.

    Which brings me to a safety warning: Sodium is really rather dangerous. If we had been anywhere within 15 feet of this explosion, it would have sprayed us with molten sodium and sodium hydroxide. Even a tiny amount in the eyes would have been a serious medical emergency. That's why I built a device that let me release it in a very controlled way from a great distance: If you want to do anything even remotely like this, you should take similar precautions. While it's safe to drop a tiny piece, maybe a few millimeters on edge, into a bowl of water, if you are wearing safety glasses, the force of the explosion goes up non-linearly with size. A lot of people have hurt themselves by going to bigger and bigger pieces thinking it's just going to do more of the same. It doesn't: At some point it turns from a fizzle and flame into a real explosion, like a shotgun.

    There's also the issue of smoke, of which a lot is produced. I'm not sure what the smoke is, but I suspect it's powdered soda lye (caustic soda, otherwise known as sodium hydroxide), which means you really, really don't want to get in the way of it. Or it could be powdered sodium oxide, which might react over time with carbon dioxide in the air to form sodium carbonate or bicarbonate. I really don't know. But if it is powdered soda lye it would severely burn your eyes, lungs, and skin, and no safety glasses would protect you. Be sure you are upwind.

    We had wet down about a 15 foot radius all around, and true to expectations, there were a series of secondary explosions as balls of sodium ejected by the main explosion hit the ground. Unfortunately I was taken aback by the explosion and jerked the camera, so you can't see them. That's one reason the later videos came out better: I used a tripod.

    I had planned to hose down and maybe neutralize the driveway the next morning, but in a fascinating display of nature, the driveway was full of little yellow butterflies the next morning.

    I've read that male butterflies collect sodium as a present for their mates, and they sure seemed to like mine, so I decided to leave it. I'm surprised they liked what must be a fairly basic solution, but then maybe it's just neutralized decades of road acid.

    According to the popular radio entomologist May Berenbaum from the University of Illinois, I was right about the butterflies. She writes:
    "They're called sulfur butterflies (in the family Pieridae) and the general consensus is that they are indeed after sodium, which is transferred to females in the spermatophore or sperm package.
    Here are some references about the phenomenon:
    Adler, P. and D. Pearson, 1982. Why do male butterflies visit mud puddles? Can. J. Zool. 60: 322-325.
    Arms, K., P. Feeny and R.C. Lederhouse, 1974. Sodium: stimulus for puddling behavior by tiger swallowtail butterflies, Papilio glaucus. Science 185: 372-374.
    Smedley, S. R. and T. Eisner 1996. Sodium--a male moth's gift to its offspring. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 93:809-13.

    There's something intensely sad about this. These tiny creatures have nothing to give but a little package of sodium, but this they give with all their heart. It is their life, their hope, their future, and they give it, asking nothing in return, that their children might have a better start in life. I suppose it should be uplifting, but somehow it just seems terribly sad to me.

    Moving on, I still needed to work out the details of my Sodium Party. The classic thing to do with sodium is to throw it in a lake. I own a lake. It's obvious what to do, right? Actually, it's not that simple. For one thing, I care a great deal about the fish and frogs in my lake, and don't wish to poison or shock them. Sodium certainly isn't poisonous, but it could raise the pH measurably, even in my acre and a half lake (I did the math). More of a problem would be intense shock waves. After all, fishing with dynamite is a redneck tradition, and I don't allow fishing in my lake, even by me.

    There was also that phone call from the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, which somehow got wind of my idea. They believe that sodium is a caustic waste material which may not be dumped into the waters of the state in any quantity. I question that on two grounds, first I question that there is no lower reporting limit on sodium, and second I question that my lake is a water of the state. Having worked as a volunteer for an environmental water quality watchdog organization, and having spoken with several people there about this, I think I'm almost certainly right in believing that I have the legal right to dump a few ounces of sodium into my private lake if I so choose. The representative of the IEPA, however, disagreed with me on that conclusion.

    Fortunately, no constitutional crisis developed out of this impasse, because by the time he put is foot down, I had already decided that I really didn't want to place my fish in harms way anyway.

    The day before the party a few intrepid souls came out to test my ingenious workaround. I cleared a small floating deck, put a tarp over it with edges so I could flood the whole thing with about an inch of water, and put a small kids swimming pool full of water in the middle. Then I anchored the whole thing out in the middle of the lake with the sodium release-o-tron on it.

    I loaded the machine with a 109.5 gram solid lump of sodium (about twice as big as the piece in my first experiment on land), rowed away, and started the cameras rolling.

    The idea was that the sodium would explode in the pool, and at most a trivial amount would escape to the surrounding lake, where it would be instantly vaporized. I could then neutralize the pool water with a touch of hydrochloric acid ("Muriatic acid" at any hardware store), leaving only slightly salty water in the pool. (Sodium goes to hydrogen gas plus sodium and hydroxide ions in the water. Hydrochloric acid is chlorine and hydrogen ions: The hydrogen ions combine with the hydroxide ions to form water and neutralize the pH, while the sodium and chlorine ions are what is more commonly known as dissolved table salt. Not even the IEPA, I believe, has a regulation against dumping slightly salty water.)

    But that's not quite how it worked out. There was an initial large explosion:

    Then there were a series of secondary explosions obviously caused by a single fairly large chunk that was literally hopping across the lake. It was thrown high up into the air, came down to hit the water at a high rate of speed, and was then thrown back up into the air by the resulting explosion. This happened at least three, maybe four times, so far as I can tell from the video.

    This is quite alarming: The longest time between impacts, timed on the videotape, was 3.12 seconds. If you do the math, this means the chunk was thrown almost 40 feet high. Fortunately it was going reasonably close to straight up and down, and we were quite far away (about 200 feet). But this skipping behavior, which so far as I know is documented here for the first time on the internet, clearly gives the whole thing far greater potential reach. It's easy to imagine a chunk skipping hundreds of feet.

    I think this skipping behavior is one reason reports on what happens to sodium when you throw it in water are so varied and contradictory. As you will see in the videos below, it varies tremendously depending on the size of the chunk, how hard it hits the water, how deep the water is, and probably on the temperature of the air and water.

    Very small pieces skid around and may or may not burn, but don't generally explode. Larger pieces explode and disintegrate themselves. Still larger pieces explode but stay intact, ejecting a solid chunk high into the air. Of course when the chunk comes back down, it's anyone's guess what happens next.

    If someone were to throw a chunk like this (about three ounces) by hand into a lake, it could very easy come back and hit them. This video tape clearly demonstrates that sodium can throw itself farther than you can. And more ominously, you can clearly see on at least one of the jumps that it tends to come back at the direction it was thrown from. My theory is that when it hits the water it forms a cavity as it plunges down. This cavity acts like a cannon barrel to direct the chunk back in the direction it came from, when the steam and evolved hydrogen explode.

    For this reason, I think a repeat of this method of deployment would be ill advised. It simply isn't predictable enough to be safe. When the pool is surrounded by wet driveway, there's no obvious way for chunks to skip long distances, and that's the way I decided to do it for the main party.

    On the day of the party I set up the Release-O-Tron at one end of our parking lot, and laid out a pair of hoses connected to the well pump in the lake (which provides an endless supply of water). I ran the hoses for about an hour to get the whole gravel area wet down, and they were left running most of the time, to keep a good puddle about 40-50ft in diameter around the swimming pool.

    Starting around 5:30 we set off a bunch of explosions, using a variety of different sizes and configurations of sodium, during daylight and night time. Some were solid chunks, others were cut up into sugar-cube sized bits:Sodium Party
    Periodic Table home

    I'd read about, and heard stories about, throwing sodium into water. It's a classic thing chemistry students do in college, and based on the reports I have been able to find on the internet, they are often drunk at the time.

    While anecdotal evidence would suggest that many people have thrown sodium into the lakes and streams of the world, they have been reprehensibly lax in documenting the results. I could find no reliable, and I stress the word reliable, reports on what actually happens. What reports I did find were contradictory: As you will see, I now know why. The only videos I could find were of pathetic thumbnail-sized bits skidding about in a bowl. (Click here to see my version of this: It's really boring, trust me.)

    (A note on videos: All the videos on this page are in QuickTime format, and most of them require QuickTime V5 or better. You can download the latest version of QuickTime for Macintosh or Windows from http://www.apple.com/quicktime/download.)

    To do better than that, I decided I should produce a comprehensive online reference on sodium dropping, with documentation on the size and shape of the chunks, how thrown, and most importantly with videos of the resulting explosions. To do this, I held a Sodium Party. People brought chips and soda and we had a cookout.

    The first step was the procurement, through eBay, of three and half pounds of solid sodium metal for about a hundred dollars. This is a decent price for a small quantity like this. Small being a relative term: It's used by the ton in industry, but anything more than a few grams is a dangerous quantity if found in your home. Three and a half pounds is enough, for example, to blow your home to bits under the right conditions.

    Next I constructed a patented Sodium Release-o-tron:

    It was designed to be constructed in less than an hour using only things I already had lying around the shop, be very unlikely to go off by accident, and be unable to fail when activated. So far so good.

    Here's a picture of the first lump I loaded into it, in a preliminary experiment about a month before the party:

    Click here for a video showing how this lump was cut off of the main block: A wood chisel and some pushing is all it takes, because this stuff is very, very soft.

    And here's a picture of what happened when we pulled the string:

    Click here to see a video of this first explosion. (But only if you've got a fast connection, because it's not the best video by far: See below for much better ones if loading these takes time for you.)

    This chunk, about 50 grams, gave a surprisingly strong bang, especially considering that there was no containment and no intentional pre-mixing of reactive chemicals, at least one of which is normally a prerequisite for a sharp report.

    My theory is that it's a fuel-air explosion caused by mixing of the hydrogen gas with air, ignited a second or two later (as you can see in the video) by the heat that builds up in the sodium. The heating of the sodium acts as the time fuse needed to make any fuel air bomb work. This theory would imply that only a minimal shock wave should be transmitted into the water, since the explosion would be happening well above the surface, as the picture seems to show. Unfortunately that theory is not supported by the fact that the metal bucket was split at the seams, even though less than an inch of rim extended over the level of the water.

    Which brings me to a safety warning: Sodium is really rather dangerous. If we had been anywhere within 15 feet of this explosion, it would have sprayed us with molten sodium and sodium hydroxide. Even a tiny amount in the eyes would have been a serious medical emergency. That's why I built a device that let me release it in a very controlled way from a great distance: If you want to do anything even remotely like this, you should take similar precautions. While it's safe to drop a tiny piece, maybe a few millimeters on edge, into a bowl of water, if you are wearing safety glasses, the force of the explosion goes up non-linearly with size. A lot of people have hurt themselves by going to bigger and bigger pieces thinking it's just going to do more of the same. It doesn't: At some point it turns from a fizzle and flame into a real explosion, like a shotgun.

    There's also the issue of smoke, of which a lot is produced. I'm not sure what the smoke is, but I suspect it's powdered soda lye (caustic soda, otherwise known as sodium hydroxide), which means you really, really don't want to get in the way of it. Or it could be powdered sodium oxide, which might react over time with carbon dioxide in the air to form sodium carbonate or bicarbonate. I really don't know. But if it is powdered soda lye it would severely burn your eyes, lungs, and skin, and no safety glasses would protect you. Be sure you are upwind.

    We had wet down about a 15 foot radius all around, and true to expectations, there were a series of secondary explosions as balls of sodium ejected by the main explosion hit the ground. Unfortunately I was taken aback by the explosion and jerked the camera, so you can't see them. That's one reason the later videos came out better: I used a tripod.

    I had planned to hose down and maybe neutralize the driveway the next morning, but in a fascinating display of nature, the driveway was full of little yellow butterflies the next morning.

    I've read that male butterflies collect sodium as a present for their mates, and they sure seemed to like mine, so I decided to leave it. I'm surprised they liked what must be a fairly basic solution, but then maybe it's just neutralized decades of road acid.

    According to the popular radio entomologist May Berenbaum from the University of Illinois, I was right about the butterflies. She writes:
    "They're called sulfur butterflies (in the family Pieridae) and the general consensus is that they are indeed after sodium, which is transferred to females in the spermatophore or sperm package.
    Here are some references about the phenomenon:
    Adler, P. and D. Pearson, 1982. Why do male butterflies visit mud puddles? Can. J. Zool. 60: 322-325.
    Arms, K., P. Feeny and R.C. Lederhouse, 1974. Sodium: stimulus for puddling behavior by tiger swallowtail butterflies, Papilio glaucus. Science 185: 372-374.
    Smedley, S. R. and T. Eisner 1996. Sodium--a male moth's gift to its offspring. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 93:809-13.

    There's something intensely sad about this. These tiny creatures have nothing to give but a little package of sodium, but this they give with all their heart. It is their life, their hope, their future, and they give it, asking nothing in return, that their children might have a better start in life. I suppose it should be uplifting, but somehow it just seems terribly sad to me.

    Moving on, I still needed to work out the details of my Sodium Party. The classic thing to do with sodium is to throw it in a lake. I own a lake. It's obvious what to do, right? Actually, it's not that simple. For one thing, I care a great deal about the fish and frogs in my lake, and don't wish to poison or shock them. Sodium certainly isn't poisonous, but it could raise the pH measurably, even in my acre and a half lake (I did the math). More of a problem would be intense shock waves. After all, fishing with dynamite is a redneck tradition, and I don't allow fishing in my lake, even by me.

    There was also that phone call from the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, which somehow got wind of my idea. They believe that sodium is a caustic waste material which may not be dumped into the waters of the state in any quantity. I question that on two grounds, first I question that there is no lower reporting limit on sodium, and second I question that my lake is a water of the state. Having worked as a volunteer for an environmental water quality watchdog organization, and having spoken with several people there about this, I think I'm almost certainly right in believing that I have the legal right to dump a few ounces of sodium into my private lake if I so choose. The representative of the IEPA, however, disagreed with me on that conclusion.

    Fortunately, no constitutional crisis developed out of this impasse, because by the time he put is foot down, I had already decided that I really didn't want to place my fish in harms way anyway.

    The day before the party a few intrepid souls came out to test my ingenious workaround. I cleared a small floating deck, put a tarp over it with edges so I could flood the whole thing with about an inch of water, and put a small kids swimming pool full of water in the middle. Then I anchored the whole thing out in the middle of the lake with the sodium release-o-tron on it.

    I loaded the machine with a 109.5 gram solid lump of sodium (about twice as big as the piece in my first experiment on land), rowed away, and started the cameras rolling.

    The idea was that the sodium would explode in the pool, and at most a trivial amount would escape to the surrounding lake, where it would be instantly vaporized. I could then neutralize the pool water with a touch of hydrochloric acid ("Muriatic acid" at any hardware store), leaving only slightly salty water in the pool. (Sodium goes to hydrogen gas plus sodium and hydroxide ions in the water. Hydrochloric acid is chlorine and hydrogen ions: The hydrogen ions combine with the hydroxide ions to form water and neutralize the pH, while the sodium and chlorine ions are what is more commonly known as dissolved table salt. Not even the IEPA, I believe, has a regulation against dumping slightly salty water.)

    But that's not quite how it worked out. There was an initial large explosion:

    Then there were a series of secondary explosions obviously caused by a single fairly large chunk that was literally hopping across the lake. It was thrown high up into the air, came down to hit the water at a high rate of speed, and was then thrown back up into the air by the resulting explosion. This happened at least three, maybe four times, so far as I can tell from the video.

    This is quite alarming: The longest time between impacts, timed on the videotape, was 3.12 seconds. If you do the math, this means the chunk was thrown almost 40 feet high. Fortunately it was going reasonably close to straight up and down, and we were quite far away (about 200 feet). But this skipping behavior, which so far as I know is documented here for the first time on the internet, clearly gives the whole thing far greater potential reach. It's easy to imagine a chunk skipping hundreds of feet.

    I think this skipping behavior is one reason reports on what happens to sodium when you throw it in water are so varied and contradictory. As you will see in the videos below, it varies tremendously depending on the size of the chunk, how hard it hits the water, how deep the water is, and probably on the temperature of the air and water.

    Very small pieces skid around and may or may not burn, but don't generally explode. Larger pieces explode and disintegrate themselves. Still larger pieces explode but stay intact, ejecting a solid chunk high into the air. Of course when the chunk comes back down, it's anyone's guess what happens next.

    If someone were to throw a chunk like this (about three ounces) by hand into a lake, it could very easy come back and hit them. This video tape clearly demonstrates that sodium can throw itself farther than you can. And more ominously, you can clearly see on at least one of the jumps that it tends to come back at the direction it was thrown from. My theory is that when it hits the water it forms a cavity as it plunges down. This cavity acts like a cannon barrel to direct the chunk back in the direction it came from, when the steam and evolved hydrogen explode.

    For this reason, I think a repeat of this method of deployment would be ill advised. It simply isn't predictable enough to be safe. When the pool is surrounded by wet driveway, there's no obvious way for chunks to skip long distances, and that's the way I decided to do it for the main party.

    On the day of the party I set up the Release-O-Tron at one end of our parking lot, and laid out a pair of hoses connected to the well pump in the lake (which provides an endless supply of water). I ran the hoses for about an hour to get the whole gravel area wet down, Sodium Party
    Periodic Table home

    I'd read about, and heard stories about, throwing sodium into water. It's a classic thing chemistry students do in college, and based on the reports I have been able to find on the internet, they are often drunk at the time.

    While anecdotal evidence would suggest that many people have thrown sodium into the lakes and streams of the world, they have been reprehensibly lax in documenting the results. I could find no reliable, and I stress the word reliable, reports on what actually happens. What reports I did find were contradictory: As you will see, I now know why. The only videos I could find were of pathetic thumbnail-sized bits skidding about in a bowl. (Click here to see my version of this: It's really boring, trust me.)

    (A note on videos: All the videos on this page are in QuickTime format, and most of them require QuickTime V5 or better. You can download the latest version of QuickTime for Macintosh or Windows from http://www.apple.com/quicktime/download.)

    To do better than that, I decided I should produce a comprehensive online reference on sodium dropping, with documentation on the size and shape of the chunks, how thrown, and most importantly with videos of the resulting explosions. To do this, I held a Sodium Party. People brought chips and soda and we had a cookout.

    The first step was the procurement, through eBay, of three and half pounds of solid sodium metal for about a hundred dollars. This is a decent price for a small quantity like this. Small being a relative term: It's used by the ton in industry, but anything more than a few grams is a dangerous quantity if found in your home. Three and a half pounds is enough, for example, to blow your home to bits under the right conditions.

    Next I constructed a patented Sodium Release-o-tron:

    It was designed to be constructed in less than an hour using only things I already had lying around the shop, be very unlikely to go off by accident, and be unable to fail when activated. So far so good.

    Here's a picture of the first lump I loaded into it, in a preliminary experiment about a month before the party:

    Click here for a video showing how this lump was cut off of the main block: A wood chisel and some pushing is all it takes, because this stuff is very, very soft.

    And here's a picture of what happened when we pulled the string:

    Click here to see a video of this first explosion. (But only if you've got a fast connection, because it's not the best video by far: See below for much better ones if loading these takes time for you.)

    This chunk, about 50 grams, gave a surprisingly strong bang, especially considering that there was no containment and no intentional pre-mixing of reactive chemicals, at least one of which is normally a prerequisite for a sharp report.

    My theory is that it's a fuel-air explosion caused by mixing of the hydrogen gas with air, ignited a second or two later (as you can see in the video) by the heat that builds up in the sodium. The heating of the sodium acts as the time fuse needed to make any fuel air bomb work. This theory would imply that only a minimal shock wave should be transmitted into the water, since the explosion would be happening well above the surface, as the picture seems to show. Unfortunately that theory is not supported by the fact that the metal bucket was split at the seams, even though less than an inch of rim extended over the level of the water.

    Which brings me to a safety warning: Sodium is really rather dangerous. If we had been anywhere within 15 feet of this explosion, it would have sprayed us with molten sodium and sodium hydroxide. Even a tiny amount in the eyes would have been a serious medical emergency. That's why I built a device that let me release it in a very controlled way from a great distance: If you want to do anything even remotely like this, you should take similar precautions. While it's safe to drop a tiny piece, maybe a few millimeters on edge, into a bowl of water, if you are wearing safety glasses, the force of the explosion goes up non-linearly with size. A lot of people have hurt themselves by going to bigger and bigger pieces thinking it's just going to do more of the same. It doesn't: At some point it turns from a fizzle and flame into a real explosion, like a shotgun.

    There's also the issue of smoke, of which a lot is produced. I'm not sure what the smoke is, but I suspect it's powdered soda lye (caustic soda, otherwise known as sodium hydroxide), which means you really, really don't want to get in the way of it. Or it could be powdered sodium oxide, which might react over time with carbon dioxide in the air to form sodium carbonate or bicarbonate. I really don't know. But if it is powdered soda lye it would severely burn your eyes, lungs, and skin, and no safety glasses would protect you. Be sure you are upwind.

    We had wet down about a 15 foot radius all around, and true to expectations, there were a series of secondary explosions as balls of sodium ejected by the main explosion hit the ground. Unfortunately I was taken aback by the explosion and jerked the camera, so you can't see them. That's one reason the later videos came out better: I used a tripod.

    I had planned to hose down and maybe neutralize the driveway the next morning, but in a fascinating display of nature, the driveway was full of little yellow butterflies the next morning.

    I've read that male butterflies collect sodium as a present for their mates, and they sure seemed to like mine, so I decided to leave it. I'm surprised they liked what must be a fairly basic solution, but then maybe it's just neutralized decades of road acid.

    According to the popular radio entomologist May Berenbaum from the University of Illinois, I was right about the butterflies. She writes:
    "They're called sulfur butterflies (in the family Pieridae) and the general consensus is that they are indeed after sodium, which is transferred to females in the spermatophore or sperm package.
    Here are some references about the phenomenon:
    Adler, P. and D. Pearson, 1982. Why do male butterflies visit mud puddles? Can. J. Zool. 60: 322-325.
    Arms, K., P. Feeny and R.C. Lederhouse, 1974. Sodium: stimulus for puddling behavior by tiger swallowtail butterflies, Papilio glaucus. Science 185: 372-374.
    Smedley, S. R. and T. Eisner 1996. Sodium--a male moth's gift to its offspring. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 93:809-13.

    There's something intensely sad about this. These tiny creatures have nothing to give but a little package of sodium, but this they give with all their heart. It is their life, their hope, their future, and they give it, asking nothing in return, that their children might have a better start in life. I suppose it should be uplifting, but somehow it just seems terribly sad to me.

    Moving on, I still needed to work out the details of my Sodium Party. The classic thing to do with sodium is to throw it in a lake. I own a lake. It's obvious what to do, right? Actually, it's not that simple. For one thing, I care a great deal about the fish and frogs in my lake, and don't wish to poison or shock them. Sodium certainly isn't poisonous, but it could raise the pH measurably, even in my acre and a half lake (I did the math). More of a problem would be intense shock waves. After all, fishing with dynamite is a redneck tradition, and I don't allow fishing in my lake, even by me.

    There was also that phone call from the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, which somehow got wind of my idea. They believe that sodium is a caustic waste material which may not be dumped into the waters of the state in any quantity. I question that on two grounds, first I question that there is no lower reporting limit on sodium, and second I question that my lake is a water of the state. Having worked as a volunteer for an environmental water quality watchdog organization, and having spoken with several people there about this, I think I'm almost certainly right in believing that I have the legal right to dump a few ounces of sodium into my private lake if I so choose. The representative of the IEPA, however, disagreed with me on that conclusion.

    Fortunately, no constitutional crisis developed out of this impasse, because by the time he put is foot down, I had already decided that I really didn't want to place my fish in harms way anyway.

    The day before the party a few intrepid souls came out to test my ingenious workaround. I cleared a small floating deck, put a tarp over it with edges so I could flood the whole thing with about an inch of water, and put a small kids swimming pool full of water in the middle. Then I anchored the whole thing out in the middle of the lake with the sodium release-o-tron on it.

    I loaded the machine with a 109.5 gram solid lump of sodium (about twice as big as the piece in my first experiment on land), rowed away, and started the cameras rolling.

    The idea was that the sodium would explode in the pool, and at most a trivial amount would escape to the surrounding lake, where it would be instantly vaporized. I could then neutralize the pool water with a touch of hydrochloric acid ("Muriatic acid" at any hardware store), leaving only slightly salty water in the pool. (Sodium goes to hydrogen gas plus sodium and hydroxide ions in the water. Hydrochloric acid is chlorine and hydrogen ions: The hydrogen ions combine with the hydroxide ions to form water and neutralize the pH, while the sodium and chlorine ions are what is more commonly known as dissolved table salt. Not even the IEPA, I believe, has a regulation against dumping slightly salty water.)

    But that's not quite how it worked out. There was an initial large explosion:

    Then there were a series of secondary explosions obviously caused by a single fairly large chunk that was literally hopping across the lake. It was thrown high up into the air, came down to hit the water at a high rate of speed, and was then thrown back up into the air by the resulting explosion. This happened at least three, maybe four times, so far as I can tell from the video.

    This is quite alarming: The longest time between impacts, timed on the videotape, was 3.12 seconds. If you do the math, this means the chunk was thrown almost 40 feet high. Fortunately it was going reasonably close to straight up and down, and we were quite far away (about 200 feet). But this skipping behavior, which so far as I know is documented here for the first time on the internet, clearly gives the whole thing far greater potential reach. It's easy to imagine a chunk skipping hundreds of feet.

    I think this skipping behavior is one reason reports on what happens to sodium when you throw it in water are so varied and contradictory. As you will see in the videos below, it varies tremendously depending on the size of the chunk, how hard it hits the water, how deep the water is, and probably on the temperature of the air and water.

    Very small pieces skid around and may or may not burn, but don't generally explode. Larger pieces explode and disintegrate themselves. Still larger pieces explode but stay intact, ejecting a solid chunk high into the air. Of course when the chunk comes back down, it's anyone's guess what happens next.

    If someone were to throw a chunk like this (about three ounces) by hand into a lake, it could very easy come back and hit them. This video tape clearly demonstrates that sodium can throw itself farther than you can. And more ominously, you can clearly see on at least one of the jumps that it tends to come back at the direction it was thrown from. My theory is that when it hits the water it forms a cavity as it plunges down. This cavity acts like a cannon barrel to direct the chunk back in the direction it came from, when the steam and evolved hydrogen explode.

    For this reason, I think a repeat of this method of deployment would be ill advised. It simply isn't predictable enough to be safe. When the pool is surrounded by wet driveway, there's no obvious way for chunks to skip long distances, and that's the way I decided to do it for the main party.

    On the day of the party I set up the Release-O-Tron at one end of our parking lot, and laid out a pair of hoses connected to the well pump in the lake (which provides an endless supply of water). I ran the hoses for about an hour to get the whole gravel area wet down, and they were left running most of the time, to keep a good puddle about 40-50ft in diameter around the swimming pool.

    Starting around 5:30 we set off a bunch of explosions, using a variety of different sizes and configurations of sodium, during daylight and night time. Some were solid chunks, others were cut up into sugar-cube sized bits:and they were left running most of the time, to keep a good puddle about 40-50ft in diameter around the swimming pool.

    Starting around 5:30 we set off a bunch of explosions, using a variety of different sizes and configurations of sodium, during daylight and night time. Some were solid chunks, others were cut up into sugar-cube sized bits:

    1. Re:Article Text by delta407 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm starting an image mirror here:
      http://www.visi.com/~rwglynn/mirror/

    2. Re:Article Text by Archon-X · · Score: 3, Funny

      "I've read that male butterflies collect sodium as a present for their mates"

      Strange, I thought collecting explosive stuff was the plight of the 13year before metamorphisis.

    3. Re:Article Text by delta407 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Formatted text and all images are now live on the mirror.

      No movies, though. ;-)

    4. Re:Article Text by cetan · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not that I think visi is going to get /.'ed but I've put a mirror up here as well (using your mirror).

      --
      In Soviet Russia...michael would be rotting in Siberia!
    5. Re:Article Text by surprise_audit · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Reminds me of a senior-year student back when I was in school (20+ years ago). This guy, normally fairly bright, decided that it would be possible to collect hydrogen over water by filling a gas jar with water, inverting it in a water bath, then introducing a pellet of sodium under the gas jar.

      Everything went as planned for a few seconds, then the burning molten sodium caused the same kind of fuel/air explosion as described in the 'Sodium Party' article. The resultant shockwave took the bottom out of the glass(!!) water bath, releasing about 5 gallons of water onto the workbench, along with little bits of fizzing sodium. The gas jar (probably about 1 pound in weight) cleared the adjacent bench, landing maybe 10 feet away.

    6. Re:Article Text by hughbar · · Score: 1

      Happily I had a science master in the UK in the 60's who used to LOVE to do this..he had also devised a drop mechanism and used a dustbin in the middle of a rugby (like American football, but better) pitch.

      Eventually it was banned from the pitch because of the scorch marks but everyone, masters, pupils from both science and arts enjoyed it and remembers it even now..plus ça change etc.

      --
      On y va, qui mal y pense!
    7. Re:Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's something intensely sad about this. These tiny creatures have nothing to give but a little package of sodium, but this they give with all their heart. It is their life, their hope, their future, and they give it, asking nothing in return, that their children might have a better start in life. I suppose it should be uplifting, but somehow it just seems terribly sad to me.

      What a FAG!!!

    8. Re:Article Text by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 3, Informative

      Everything including the movies is being mirroed here. Should have everything in a little bit.

      --
      Help us build a better map!
    9. Re:Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and for those too lazy or poor to get Sodium, a satisfying explosion can be had using a related reaction. Get a quantity of aluminium foil, and place in a glass jar. Add a couple of spoon fulls of sodium hydroxide. Add boiling water, to half fill the jar. Screw the lid on quickly, and retreat to a safe distance. The reaction is exothermic, producing hydrogen gas. Because it is exothermic, it goes faster and faster and faster, until the pressure exceeds the ability of the glass jar to cope. When the glass jar ruptures, hot hydrogen and air mix, causing a very satisfying bang.

    10. Re:Article Text by charnov · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just on the outskirts of the small Indiana town I grew up in (go Trojans), there is a pond in the woods that is easy to spot by the lack of trees within about an eigth of a mile.

      The story goes (as told to us by my high school chem teacher a few years later), two "former" students of the high school stole a large quantity of sodium from the chemistry store room (several pounds...it had been there since the 50's stored in a big glass jar filled with, I think, kerosene). They took the jar to the pond, got in a rowboat, and dropped the sodium out in the middle. Apparantley it took some time for the reaction to start, because they had enough time to get to the shore and pop open some beers.

      The explosion leveled trees over a wide area, shattered windows for miles, and knocked a house off it's foundation a few hundred yards away. This happened in the early eighties and the local authorities though we had been nuked.

      They found some of the boys about a mile away. The good news was that they probably died from inhalation of the gases before the explosion.

      Oh, my home town has also had someone die from a beer keg explosion (he put it in the freezer. They found his head down the street), and a gas main explosion that was visible from the shuttle (I got a call from my mom to look east. You could see the glow from over a hundred miles away).

      And my family wonders why I moved.

      --
      [RIAA] says its concern is artists. That's true, in just the sense that a cattle rancher is concerned about its cattle.
    11. Re:Article Text by Fnagaton · · Score: 1

      LOL Thanks. I was just going to ask what it would be like to deeply submerge a quantity of sodium rather than having it skip around on the surface of a lake. :) I'm also thinking that one of my housemates reads this site and he must be having dangerous ideas right about now.

      --
      Martin Piper
      Owner - ReplicaNet and RNLobby
    12. Re:Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many thanks, but could someone please convert them to something more universally usable than Sorenson QuickTime?

    13. Re:Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that should of course have been in reply to the video mirror posts by Baloo Ursidae and the cedarville.edu AC.

    14. Re:Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmm, yes, I see the point:

      "He says the truth, but I don't like it. The message must be a troll!"

      Hey moderator, look at the grandparent message. The article was repeated for no reason for three times. That is a crapflood.

    15. Re:Article Text by corey_lawson · · Score: 1

      ...I seem to remember when we lived in San Diego that someone was doing this with soda bottles, aluminum and muriatic acid (HCl). PETE soda bottles can withstand some pretty good pressures, so I imagine one of these going off has got to be...eye-opening.

    16. Re:Article Text by psych031337 · · Score: 2

      I am not planning to stomp the credibility of the poster, but to me this sounds like male cow-excrement...

      a) With a reaction so volatile, how can it be delayed long enough to row back to the shore before it goes off?
      b) How can they die from the inhalation of gases (which?) PRIOR to the explosion? Was it in their beer cans?

      I do belive that a certain amount of sodium can damage the landscape like this, but I think this case has some flaws... can someone elaborate why I am wrong?

      --
      +++ath0
    17. Re:Article Text by DancingSword · · Score: 1

      Sodium et al is packed in oil. If one removes an oil-packed, oil-soaked hunk of sodium from a jar/bottle, and drops it onto a lake, the oil won't acquire Spontaneous Disappearance just because you did so, eh?

      If it is packed in a light oil it'll get compromised quickly, if packed in a heavier one, then slower, right?

      I don't consider the story about dumping oil-coated sodium on a lake and having time to get to shore before - BAM - to be < ahem > "male cow" excrement.
      --
      Messages to/for me ( in me journal )
  10. Re:Argh by matthewn · · Score: 1

    Yep. Instant slashdottage. Damn. Something's gotta be done about this silly Web we've saddled ourselves with. It's full of fun stuff, but the moment said fun stuff is "discovered," a modest server buckles under the load, or some poor bastard gets a bandwidth bill from his hosting service that's enough to make him spew root beer all over his monitor. This is not a sane system! What can be done?

  11. How long by geek · · Score: 3, Funny

    How long before John Ashcroft has him arrested for creating bomb materials and prosecuting him as an Al-Qaeda terrorist?

    1. Re:How long by program21 · · Score: 1

      Right after the /.'ing is done and they can see for sure...wait, no, they've probably already done it.

      --
      This has been a test. Had this been a real emergency, we would have fled in terror and you would not have been informed.
    2. Re:How long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4 ... 3 ... 2 ... 1

      that oughta do it . . .

    3. Re:How long by setzman · · Score: 1

      Faster than /. can melt a underpowered server, which is about the time the 5th comment is posted.

      --
      C:\>
    4. Re:How long by gailwynand · · Score: 1


      More like how long before the Greenpeace hippies get on his ass for poisoning ponds and butterflies.

      --
      A pilot, in those days, was the only unfettered and entirely independent human being that lived in the earth.-Mark Twain
    5. Re:How long by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 2

      Well, yes, but the butterflies WANT the sodium.

      Just like our government to deny the butterflies their right to good wholesome chunks of sodium.

      I'm wondering how the heck butterflies get sodium in nature. Surely any sodium in the wild would have surely reacted and become part of some compound. Do the butterflies have some natural method of extracting it from other materials?

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    6. Re:How long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considefing that nobody can get to this site, then either:
      1) He is slashdoted.
      2) He is long gone, headed for gutanimo bay. Welcome to the brave new world.

    7. Re:How long by Loki_1929 · · Score: 5, Funny

      CNN Headline tomorrow...

      Breaking News!!!

      Attouney General John Ashcroft has made a major announcement on the breakup of a suspected Al Qaeda terrorist cell in the US. Read more below.

      -
      "Earlier today, we stopped an unfolding terrorist plot here in the United States. A group of individuals believed to be cells for Al Qaeda were arrested after several hundred anonymous TIPS. These cells seemed to have once again used the evil internet, source of all evil and the backbone of the "Axis of Evil(r)"; specifically a website going by the name 'slashdot' to come together and plan the destruction of my... I mean our great nation. About 250,000 "enemy combatants" were taken into custody and are currently being housed in an undisclosed location. All appear to be Muslim; extremest; terrorist; evil; doubleplus ungood. Do not let these terrorists win, you must go about your lives as usual, and... just please forget we have these people in custody. Thank you."
      -

      In an unrelated story, the tech industry in the US came to a grinding halt today, as most of America's computer-elites were no-shows at work. No further information is available at this time, and we've been told by unnamed sources to "shut the hell up and quit asking questions" on the topic. We don't expect to bring you more on this topic later in the day... or... ever.

      --
      -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
    8. Re:How long by azizlumiere · · Score: 1

      They order it on eBay.

      --
      -Linux is SO fast it does an infinite loop in 5 seconds.
    9. Re:How long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /.'d I worked with the guy, he's an upstanding fellow. Author of the Mathematica graphical front end.

    10. Re:How long by pyite · · Score: 1

      And considering how backwards we've been lately, water will probably be outlawed as it can be used to create explosions. Gasp!

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

  12. Re:Whyyy by CoolCash · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sodium + water = BOOM! http://bifrost.unl.edu/ehs/ChemicalInfo/h2oreact.h tml

  13. Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by InterruptDescriptorT · · Score: 5, Funny

    When I was in university, my Chem professor (who attended the University of Kentucky) regaled us with the story of when she and four of her friends went down to Stores and checked out one kilogram of sodium. It was stored in a jar filled with some sort of oil (so it wouldn't react).

    The kids headed out under deep cover of night to a local place called 'High Bridge', so called because it was, essentially, a very high bridge over a river, parked their car, and carefully removed the sodium from the jar. On the count of three, they tossed the chunk of sodium off the bridge, letting it fall to the river below.

    She ended the story by saying, 'We sped away as fast as we could, but strangely didn't hear or really see anything unusual. We had resigned ourselves to the fact that our 'experiment' had failed until one of my friends turned back to look at the bridge and said 'Oh... my... God...'. The mushroom cloud and resulting explosion had lit the sky bright red in a remote area of Kentucky at 2am in the morning.

    There was a report in the paper the next day but no explanation as to what had happened.

    And that's why my bad-assed Chem professor will always have my utmost respect. :-)

    --
    Karma: Excellent Birds (mostly as a result of listening to Laurie Anderson)
    1. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't this reaction also produce
      ultraviolet radiation. I thought there
      was a story of a highschool chem
      instructor using a large amount of this
      and damaging the whole classes eyes.
      Could be a bullshit anecdote for all
      i know.

    2. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by sbaker · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I recall a story from high school (although it may be apochryphal) that a chemistry teacher at my school had been demonstrating the reactivity of various metals and had a number of small chunks of said metals arrayed along his bench in various jars.

      As usual the sodium was kept in mineral oil - and in the story I heard, one of the other (presumably less reactive) metals was kept under water.

      When the most trusted kid in the class was left to clean up at the end, they claimed that he'd inadvertantly placed the lump of sodium back into the jar containing water - but that it had not exploded because it was still coated with oil.

      The story goes that some hours later, the oil was finally displaced by the water in the jar and the small chunk of sodium then exploded - shattering the entire row of glass jars and spreading exotic and highly reactive metal chunks all over the room resulting in hundreds of small explosions and fires.

      I kinda suspect that this may not be a true story though because I can't find a reasonable candidate for the metal that would have to have been kept under water in order for this to be true. However, there was some kind of an explosion/fire in the lab because I remember chemistry classes being cancelled for about three weeks afterwards.

      Chemistry classes back in the mid-1960's were much more dangerous than kids are exposed to these days. I clearly recall being given small amounts of metallic mercury to *play* with!! These days, if you so much as crack a mercury thermometer they evacuate the city for three blocks in every direction. :-)

      It's a shame, mercury is incredibly good fun to play with - until the vapours poison your brain of course! It's hard to come to terms with something so heavy that's "just" a liquid - and it's amazing how the droplets 'shatter' when you hit them with the end of a ruler.

      --
      www.sjbaker.org
    3. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by rjamestaylor · · Score: 2, Informative
      • It was stored in a jar filled with some sort of oil (so it wouldn't react).
      Kerosene
      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    4. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by cybercomm · · Score: 3, Informative

      As far as i remember phosphorous (or at least the pure kind) is highly reactive with air, so it is kept in water...perhaps the story could be true after all....

      --
      Live for the present, learn from the past, and dream of the future!
    5. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by mino · · Score: 5, Funny

      Similar (first-hand, confirmable) story told to us by our high school chemistry teacher. Slicing off a thin piece of sodium off the larger chunk with a razor blade, or whatever the hell it is he used, he then proceeded to (accidentally -- he wasn't that much of a moron) drop the sliver he had cut off back into the jar, and throw the remainder of the chunk into the bowl of water. Cue enormous explosion (well, moderately enormous.. it's not like the original piece was THAT big), and an awful lot of terrified thirteen-year-olds.

      Oh, and how do I know the story's true? Well, the fire brigade turned up, the rest of the chem classes were cancelled for the day, and when we had our next class (the next morning), there was an enormous water (+ whatever other crud) stain on the roof right above where the bowl was.

      Apparently (my dad worked at the school) he was chewed out in a big way and only kept his job on the strength of the various teaching awards he'd won for making science fun (and how!)

    6. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by BagOBones · · Score: 1

      Corret... It is most often stored in Kerosene or just in a air tight container.. My chem teacher in high school would often do a demo of it at the begining of the year.. One year they got the dry sealed container without the Kerosene.. My teacher nearly blew his face off because of how much faster it reacted than the stuff coated in Kerosene..

      --
      EA David Gardner -"... but the consumers have proven that actually what they want is fun."
    7. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by afidel · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The teacher who oversaw my senior year independant study in chem had a similar story, though not quite as dangerous. The best part was she had video! Shortly after taking over as head of the chem department she had started to clean out the supply closet of dangerous things that were no longer used (or allowed to be used in many cases) for classes. During this work she found a 2.5lb block of solid sodium in a large oil filled container. Since this was enough to cause a serious explosion she immediately removed it from the school, and after making sure that the container wouldn't leak took it out to the lake behind the adjacent elementary school. She found a .22 rifle and a video camera and made a very educational film, she set the can afloat and rowed about a hundred feet away. There she placed the camera at the bow of the boat and shot the can. About 5 seconds after the can was hit and began to sink there was a massive explosion, so violent that the boat was rocked hard enough to knock the camera back into the bottom of the boat =)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    8. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This kind of happened at my high school (it shall remain nameless for the sake of fellow alumni) in Missouri City, Texas. A science teacher "inadvertently" dropped a chunk of potassium or sodium into a beaker of water (is potasium as reactive? I wouldn't know). It exploded, the fire alarm went off and the school was evacuated until the firemen cleared us to go back in

    9. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by Reece400 · · Score: 1

      We did small version of this in grade 9 science, along with burning magnesium, etc. and one example exploded in a student's face,, and he managed to singe the ceiling with another... My Gr. 10 teacher explained in detail how to build large pipe bombs,, somehow, i really don't think they care about our softer anyways,,

      Reece,

      PS. most of the above were performed without the teachers giving us protctive goggles also,,,

    10. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by simetra · · Score: 5, Funny

      We played with mercury... I was playing with a pipette, sucking mercury into it. Then I felt the heavy little droplet hit the back of my throat! I swallowed it! Should I be concerned? This was many, many years ago.

      --

      "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    11. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by nels_tomlinson · · Score: 5, Funny
      This sounds a lot like a thermax demonstration I witnessed. Liquid iron spattered the front several rows of the lecture hall. Then the people in the front rows spattered all over the rest of us as they tried to get away. No-one was hurt, though it took a little while to be sure, and there were a lot of holes in clothing. Fortunately, there weren't any smoke detectors in the building, and the sprinklers didn't go off.

      I didn't sit near the front of a class until grad school.

    12. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by countach · · Score: 2

      Mercury in pure form tends to go straight through your system with little harm. Anyway, too late now right?

    13. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by vicious_sloth · · Score: 1

      as you go down the first column of the peridoic table, the elements get more reactive, so yes potassium is more reactive then sodium

      --
      Sun is Warm, Grass is Green
    14. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by Kunta+Kinte · · Score: 2
      It was stored in a jar filled with some sort of oil (so it wouldn't react).

      the oil, at least in our case was 'parafin oil' (sp.?)

      this story brings back memories :) 20+ high schoolers sneaking out of the lab anything we thought would be explosively reactive.

      Eventually we figured that we needed metals lower down in the group, never got any potassium though. Today I thank god for that.

      --
      Based on upvotes, Ageism is the only "-ism" Slashdotters care about and think isn't SJW
    15. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by kasparov · · Score: 1

      That's OK, we had a guy try to steal some sodium from my high school...he put it in his pants pocket. Ouch!

      --
      There's no place I can be, since I found Serenity.
    16. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by jgkastra · · Score: 1
      The dangerous form of mercury is an organometallic form (methylmercury) that is converted by bacteria deep in rivers. You shouldn't be worried about playing with mercury unless you swallowed a mouthful of river mud and have a culture of said strain in your system, but even then it's a matter of waiting to see what will happen.

      I still wouldn't advise playing with it (again), but no harm done it seems.

    17. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by Phil+Karn · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes. Phosphorus, more specifically *white* phosphorus (P4) is the most likely candidate for being kept under water. This keeps it from slowly oxidizing on its own in air. When it does this, it glows in the dark; hence its name. It can also ignite spontaneously from the generated heat. Then it oxidizes real fast.

      The other allotropes of elemental phosphorus are red (polymerized white phosphorus) and black. They are not nearly as reactive or as poisonous as white phosphorus.

    18. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure if you are serious, but in case you are: according to my high school chemistry teacher, you will probably suffer no noticeable ill effects.

      There are people in the world who used to routinely swallow fairly *large* amounts of metallic mercury just for the fun of feeling it slosh around in their stomachs. They did not become poisoned or have huge rates of cancer (yet) or anything.

      That said, mercury vapor and nonmetallic mercury are quite toxic. And while metallic mercury will probably not cause you a problem, I wouldn't exactly call it safe either. In the future you should consume as little of it as possible!

    19. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by cookd · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, ever notice how people call you "crazy" a lot? They aren't just kidding.

      (Ever wonder why the Mad Hatter was mad? Because mercury was used in making hats.)

      --
      Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
    20. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by zenyu · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yo I'm not a doctor, you should ask her.

      but have a look at this
      http://www.gemgrp.com/Contaminants/18.pdf

      Basically, it should have all left your system within a few months of the exposure. If it happened today and you might become pregnant it would be a worry. Your doctor might even give you some painful drugs to try to speed it out of your body. Organic mercury is a much larger concern because your body can't get rid of it very well.

      Since you probably have a slightly higher than normal mercury level you can advise your fellow passengers in an airplane crash not to eat you first.

    21. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 1

      Lead, not mercury.

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    22. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      the mercury now sits in your appendix. it can be used as a thermometer, though it always reads 98.6.

      - a.c.

    23. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lead makes you stupid, mercury makes you crazy. Look it up or Google it.

    24. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by jamesh · · Score: 1

      no. mercury.
      it was used to cure the felt in felt hats.

      or at least that's what i read somewhere...

    25. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

      I remember one of my physics teachers talking about sticking his hands into mercury as he made a barometer. From what I recall, he said that the trick was that mercury itself isn't all that toxic, just all the compounds that it can easily become a part of.

    26. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by saskboy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Mine reads 37 degrees. Must be because I'm in Canada?

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    27. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by Robotech_Master · · Score: 3, Funny
      Little Willie from his mirror
      Licked the mercury right off,
      Thinking in his childish error,
      It would cure the whooping cough.
      At the funeral his mother
      Sadly said to Mrs. Browne:
      "Twas a chilly day for Willie
      When the mercury went down."
      --from Ruthless Rhymes for Heartless Homes, pseudonymous author given as "Col. D. Streamer" (actually Harry Graham)
      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    28. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Mercury in pure form tends to go straight through your system with little harm.

      This is actually pretty true I think. I remember a kid in high school who drank mercury to make "Terminator Poo". They video taped it.

    29. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A very reactive non-metal that would be stored under water is white phosphorous. It is explosive on contact with air. P is kept in some high school chemistry labs...
      http://www.webelements.com/webelements/elements/te xt/P/key.html

    30. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by luciensims · · Score: 1

      In 11th grade chemistry (1994/5), my teacher let us play with mercury in our hands if we wanted to.

      He used to tell us all the time that the bureaucrats were just trying to sissy up the rules because they were afraid of lawsuits. So we got to play in the lab like it was 1950, and nobody's parents had lawyers.

      As I recall, the school had stopped giving him mercury, so we used to just break a whole bunch of the old thermometers, collect it all in a jar, and pass it around the class.

      It was great fun, and mercury feels nifty. But don't drop it, or terminator 2 pieces go everywhere, and it's hard to get it all back together.

      He was a funny old man. Somehow he collected Bentleys on a teacher's salary, and used to pontificate to nobody in particular about the standard of vehicle engineering these days, and god knows what else.

      Ah, chemistry. That was a fun class. :)

    31. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by Skord · · Score: 1

      and the tape is where?

    32. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by CokeBear · · Score: 3, Funny

      We'll all miss little Willie
      We'll not see him anymore
      For what he thought was H2O
      Was H2SO4

      --
      Reality has a liberal bias
    33. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by oval_pants · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of a scene from "Tommy Boy".

      David Spade: "Did you eat a lot of paint chips when you were born?"
      Chris Farley: (grinning) "Yeahhh! Why?"

    34. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My father is a high school biology teacher. He acquired a big chunk of sodium many years ago. This chunk is as bigger than an avarage adults hand. He kept it in a glass jar with some sort of oil. I can ask him what he would keep it in. He would show the kids experiments with sodium. One of which was taking a large thick plastic bottle, filling it with water and then dropping sodium in it and quickly corking the bottle. The result was the cork being shot extremely high in the air. Pretty cool stuff. I am writing him an email right now to see if he still has it.

    35. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by ManitobaMoose · · Score: 0

      back in 7th grade our chem teacher, which actually was a demoted biology teacher wanted to show us an exothermic reaction by dipping a SMALL quantity of sodium into water. she had a 0.5 liter berzelius(sp) glass and tried to cut off a small quantity of sodium from a chunk of about 100-150g (estimate). she held that chunk with some sort of pliers. anyhow she didn't hold it firmly enough so the whole chunk fell into the glass causing a prety loud bang. the glass broke into thousends of pieces. i'm still surprised nobody got hurt.

    36. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by caldaan · · Score: 1

      Hehe, yeah they did this in our lecture too, though the lecture hall had a 30 foot ceiling( which was needed) They had the aluminum oxide adn iron oxide in two clay plant pots, the smallish kind. This created a 20 foot shower of sparks and then a decent chunk of molten iron poured out of the bottom hole of the clay pot. Personally much more impressive then sodium water and water. In my chemistry class in college instead of sodium and water they put sodium into a big jar of chlorine. The flame was so bright i saw spots for a long time.

    37. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by tomzyk · · Score: 1

      Chemistry classes back in the mid-1960's were much more dangerous than kids are exposed to these days.
      No doubt. Even when I was in highschool (early 1990's) we were allowed to play with some dangerous stuff. One year we had to do some sort of "end of the year chem project".

      A friend and I wanted to do fireworks, but the prof/teacher said it was too dangerous. So he still gave us full access to basically every chemical in the lab so we could do a presentation on sparklers instead. Basically, we made mini-fireworks: made our own shells out of papertowels doused in shelac (sp?), we had to mix and grind our own powders (containing different elements for different colors: copper, magnesium, sodium...), packed them in, added fuses (again, papertowels but this time coated in superglue I think)... when the fuses actually worked they lit up fairly well. Got some good videotape of them. I just can believe that they'd give kids nowadays access to that kind of stuff. (especially after hearing about kids shooting down their own classmates...)

      --
      Karma: NaN
    38. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by Maradine · · Score: 0

      Ahhhh, mercury. Sweetest of the transition metals.

      --

      trustedworlds.net - gaming, security, and the gunk that lives in between

    39. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by captaincucumber · · Score: 2, Funny

      High Bridge is just outside Wilmore, KY (also known as Bumfuck, Nowhere), I used to live there. High Bridge is a train bridge, and it used to be the highest in the country - when it was dedicated, the president at the time attended (Reagan? I dunno, before my time). It's a popular place to engage in miscellaneous redneck behaviours, I myself once launched a toy car off High Bridge, after fitting it with a model rocket engine. It's also a popular place to get drunk and jump, or get drunk and take a piss, whatever the local rednecks can think of.

      Golly.

    40. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

      Pelts, not felts. They used mercury in curing beaver pelts for hats.

      --
      0 1 - just my two bits
    41. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by bloth · · Score: 1

      Back in 1980-82, when I was around 12, my neighbor had a small jar of mercury. We played with the mercury many times ... pouring a small quantity out onto the concrete floor of his basement, pushing it around with playing cards and bringing a heavy wooden block down onto shiney pools and watching with great joy as the droplets scattered in every direction. I often think now about what the conditions are now like in that basement.

    42. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by bandit450 · · Score: 1

      No, felts, not pelts.
      The mercury was used to make top hats shiny.

      --
      -- Bandit450...If-Else-Do-*TWITCH*!
    43. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by operagost · · Score: 2

      And since you're an undead zombie, you take the temperature of your surroundings ...

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    44. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a) This happened in my school while I was there ('94-'98) Teacher kept his job fine.
      b) (to the parent) we were given blobs of mercury to race around on our desks then. Now, of course, we are all mad as hatters.

    45. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by ksheff · · Score: 1

      Both of you are on the same track. The fur from the animal pelts is used to make felt cloth, which is then made into hats, pool table coverings, etc. This is a good explaination of it.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    46. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't be too worried. It's a very small dose, and mercury used to be used as a cure for constipation. (Got a plug? Ram it out with liquid metal!)

    47. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by operagost · · Score: 1

      Guns don't kill people... but the explosive chemical reaction sure as hell does!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    48. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trust you? Who the hell are YOU? Reveal yourself, troll!

    49. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by wayward_son · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of what my freshman Chemistry professor did. When he threw the Sodium in water, it had a nasty habit of flying out of the bowl and landing on the lab table and burning. Well, to prevent this, the professor decided to put a watch glass over the beaker of water right after he dropped the sodium in. Unfortunately, the professor forgot what happens when hydrogen gas ignites in a closed space. Big explosion, glass flying everywhere. Fortunately, no one was hurt. But I never sat in the front row again.

    50. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Metallic Mercury (liquid form) is about 100% non toxic. Back in the good ol' days it was even intentionally ingested by people due to its laxative effect. If you swallowed liquid mercury, odds are you have nothing to worry about...

      In large quantities, it could prove to be toxic, but large quantities of liquid water, table salt and chewable vitamins are also toxic, I don't think you have anything to worry about for swallowing a droplet of mercury.

      The term "Mercury Poisoning" actually refers to people who were poisoned by Mercury Oxide. Mercury is often used in the process of working with and creating felt (at least it used to be). People who made hats from felt often ingested Mercury Oxide by working with the felt. The oxide becomes a dusty powder that can be inhaled. The term "Mad as a Hatter" refers to the dementia that is often exhibited by victims of Mercury Oxide Poisoning.

      Mercury spread over large surface areas, (e.g. Felt hats, or wooden workroom floors or benches) has a good chance to oxidize, and cannot be easily cleaned up. Often these places are shutdown and cleaned. Mercury in the human body is unlikely to form an oxide and is largely harmless. Likewise, organic mercury isn't likely to appear in your body.

      So, while you can probably safely consume mercury, it still isn't a good idea. Your bodily waste will end up in the water chain, where the mercury will also end up. Once there, it will have opportunity to oxidize and be assimilated into an organic form. In the end it isn't good for nature, but it won't directly harm you. At least not immediately.

    51. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lead was in paint, not mercury. Mercury paint probably wouldn't stick to walls very well.

    52. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by phcrack · · Score: 1

      White phosphorus is kept under water since it reacts with air.

      We had a chem teacher in high school that was doing a phosphorus demonstration and accidently knocked the demonstration tray off the desk and on to the floor. Good thing it had happened before and he had copper chloride on hand to put it out. I'm pretty sure he's still teaching too.

    53. Re:Funny story from Chemistry lecture... by hplasm · · Score: 1

      Strangely, mine reads 98.4. But I am Old Skool.

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
  14. And here I was led to believe he had the right... by hackwrench · · Score: 2, Funny

    conditions... but it appears his house is *still there*. What a let down.... The butterflies are cool though.

  15. Sodium Hydroxide by dead+sun · · Score: 3, Funny

    Don't go jumping in the pond immediately after doing this, at least not in the spot where you toss in the sodium. You'd have a pretty basic spot full of sodium hydroxide for a while until it spreads out at least. I don't think a pond of any decent size is going to be too affected by a mere 3.5 pounds though. But I could be wrong on that...

    --
    If not now, when?
    1. Re:Sodium Hydroxide by altairmaine · · Score: 5, Informative

      Easy enough to calculate the approximate pH change, at least assuming the lake isn't buffered (probably a poor assumption).

      3.5 lbs = 1.6 kg Na

      Assuming the reaction occurs completely:

      2Na + 2H2O --> 2Na(+) + H2 + 2OH(-)

      Each molecule of Na should generate one hydroxide molecule. So 1600 g Na * (1 mol / 40 g) = 40 mols Na and 40 mols OH(-) generated.

      Now we look at the pond: 1 acre = 4000 m^2 (approx). Figure a shallow pond, average depth 3 m. Then volume = 12000 m^3 or 12 million liters. Concentration OH(-): 40 mol/12 million L.

      [OH-] = 3.3 x 10^-6
      pH = -log ((10^-14)/[OH-]) = 8.5

      High school chem is your friend. Moderate pH change, nothing huge, but maybe bad for the fish. In reality, the number is probably considerably less - I'd imagine that organic buffers would soak up all those extra hydroxide ions.

    2. Re:Sodium Hydroxide by Bald+Wookie · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think you're overstating the danger by quite a bit. I've had strong (12+ Molar) NaOH solutions on my fingers a few times without much effect. We're talking concentrated solutions here, not kid's stuff. It's so strong it's syrupy. I was always quick about washing it off, but I don't remember ever being burned.

      On the other hand strong nitric or sulfuric acid is nasty. I actually had a little mishap with the nitric. Some nitric acid got sucked into a pipette bulb by another student. When it was my turn, I didn't notice the bulb was wet until it started burning. Didn't take long at all. Wound up with a nasty burn on a couple fingers and a bizzare yellow callous that took a month to go away.

      Back to bases...

      Let's work out the problem and see how nasty this really is. Take one kilo of Na. How many moles is that? A thousand grams divided by twenty three grams per mole. Lets round up and call it 44 moles.

      How many moles of hydroxide will that produce? With a one to one ratio in the balanced chemical equation, I get 44 moles of hydroxide. For someone used to working with a few grams, that sounds like a hell of a lot of hydroxide. But is it?

      To find out, I need to know much water I'm jumping into. I'm well over six feet tall. Call it 2 meters even. My "wingspan" is also about two meters. Let's make it easy. I get a cube of water, two meters on an edge, to dive into. I'll jump in with my arms outstreched, hit bottom, pivot 90 degrees and touch both sides of our 'lake'. Degree of difficulty in international competition would only be about a 1.6, but we've already bribed the French judge.

      No really, how much water is that in liters? A liter of water is a 1 decimeter cube. Therefore, an eight meter cube (two meters on a side, remember) holds 20*20*20 cubic decimeters. Wow, that's 8000 liters of water.

      OK, so we've got 44 moles in 8000 liters. I'm feeling generous now. Lets say you dumped a 80 mole chunk into our little cubic lake. That would be about four full pounds of sodium. Eighty moles in 8000 liters is a .01 molar hydroxide concentration. That gives us a pretty respectable pH of 12.

      What else has a pH of 12? We're still in the range of common household cleaners. Wet concrete is in this range, maybe a bit higher. You can get chemical burns from wet concrete, but it takes awhile. Honestly, it's a bit higher than I'd have guessed when I started. I'd give it a shot for Angles tickets anyway.

      Remember, in the real scenario we're talking about a much larger pond. Between the sodium skipping around with it's bastardized leidenfrost action and 100 kilos of Wookie jumping in, you'd see some rapid dilution.

    3. Re:Sodium Hydroxide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Each molecule of Na should generate one hydroxide molecule. So 1600 g Na * (1 mol / 40 g) = 40 mols Na and 40 mols OH(-) generated.

      1 mole of sodium = 23 g, not 40 g.
      Also, it should be discribed as "One mole Na should generate one mole of hydroxide." as there is not such a thing as hydroxide molecule. It is hydroxide ion, but you can't call an ion as molecule...

    4. Re:Sodium Hydroxide by ninewands · · Score: 2

      Considering that most static bodies of fresh water have a pH in the vicinity of 6 due to accumulated organic acids, the 3.5 pounds of sodium will only take the water a wee bit past neutral.

      The sudden change may cause fish and other critters to go into shock, but I imagine the shock wave from the explosion(s) would be more harmful than the chemical change.

    5. Re:Sodium Hydroxide by goodhell · · Score: 1

      The pH change isn't that drastic. Most natural water systems have a pH range of 6 - 9. This is also where most bacteria thrive. The pH change shouldn't be that big a deal, although it is a fast change. For public health, a higher pH in the water might make it unpalatable but in this case no big deal.

      What would affect the fish would be the concussion waves caused by the explosion. That would kill the fish more thoroughly than the pH change would.

      The organic buffers wouldn't be that big a deal. Usually you are looking for inorganic buffering systems, limestone and the like for sources of buffering. Just look at places like Bear Lake (Idaho/Utah) and Lake Baikal (Russia). They have high amounts of limestone in them and have a very high buffering capacity.

      just my 2 kopeks

    6. Re:Sodium Hydroxide by TheodoreGray · · Score: 2, Informative

      Very good estimates! The actual volume of the lake is 4.5M gallons, approximately, and I got about the same figure when I did the pH calculation, which is one reason I dropped it first into a floating pool, which I could neutralize before dumping into the lake.
      In point of fact, however, the carbon dioxide in the water would buffer it, as would any phosphorous, so the actual pH effect would probably have been completely insignificant. And there was no fish kill.

    7. Re:Sodium Hydroxide by Spyder · · Score: 1

      My AP chem teacher showed us a video of a collage class throwing sodium into a lake. They were doing it for the express purpose of increasing the pH to counteract some industrial pollution. Incidentally, if you put some phenol phalyne (sp?.. its been a long tims) in the water and use a small amount of sodium it'll sputter around in the vessal with this pink trail. Kind of a cool demo to do with an overhead projector and a pitri dish.

      --
      Spyder
  16. Re:Argh by cetan · · Score: 1

    I am more than happy to host a mirror of this if someone has a copy of it in their cache.

    --
    In Soviet Russia...michael would be rotting in Siberia!
  17. Re:Great by bsharitt · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well he probably spent all his money on the Sodium.

  18. Better than vinegar and baking soda! by phorm · · Score: 2

    Does this work more-or-less along the lines of the same idea, except that instead of mass fizzing you get a big boom? Making a chambered container what combined sodium and water upon remote would be fun to play with. Much more interesting than those lameass science volcanos made in class.
    *Note:I foresee at at least 1 or 2 references to "weapons" and terrorism. Don't be lame, people have been fascinated by big booms since long ago.

    Why do I have the feeling sodium is going to become very valuable on ebay soon - phorm

    1. Re:Better than vinegar and baking soda! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the biggest of almost all chemical "booms". My chemistry teacher once threw a pebble-sized peice of it into a mudpuddle and blew a hole into the paved parking lot 3 inches deep and about a foot around. Wanna play with it now? hope your palms aren't too sweaty while you're handling it ;-)

    2. Re:Better than vinegar and baking soda! by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2
      Try muratic acid and baking soda. ITs about %20 hdyrocloric and available in any pool store. I use to have a pool in my backyard when I was a kid and had tons of it. It was rumoured that the muratic acid mixed with pool shock would create mustard gas. I was tempted to try it but didn't cosidering I would get myself killed in the process if it was true. I highly do not recommend anyone try this because it sounds very dangerous.

      I do not know if this was true or not but the guy at my local pool store told me this. Oh shit that makes me a terrorist. Ohh call the FBI!

      Anyway with a very strong acid and base you can expect alot of heat as well as a violent chemical reaction. I tried to create some weird salts and hydrogen gas from mixing the acid and baking soda together. THe result is that the ballon melted because the container got so hot.

    3. Re:Better than vinegar and baking soda! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, muratic acid (HCL) and pool shock (sodium or calcium hypochlorite) can't make mustard gas 1,1-thiobis(2-chloroethane)

      However, pool shock can be used to make turpentine bombs and their ilk with significantly greater entertainment value* than the sodium-in-water thing and with significant cost savings.

      *(ghastly burns combined with dismemberment)

    4. Re:Better than vinegar and baking soda! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HCl + NaHCO3 = NaCl + CO2 + H20

      Salty water and a fizz is all you get.

    5. Re:Better than vinegar and baking soda! by back_pages · · Score: 2
      I can one up ya here.

      I used to work in pool construction, and we had access to 99% chlorine granules and 100% cyanuric acid powder (HCN, I believe). I had a slim understanding of high school chemistry, and thought it would be neat to mix these. Normally they are used to chlorinate a swimming pool and to stabilize the chlorine against depletion by sunlight, but that's after a pound or two is diluted in 25,000+ gallons of water.

      So we mixed about half a pound of each in a plastic chemical bottle. It got very hot and melted some of the bottle. We got bored, so we tossed it into the dumpster and walked away. A few minutes later, the dumpster (mostly filled with cardboard) was on fire. Thankfully, we had a swimming pool nearby, and put the fire out with a bucket.

      This trick was repeated later, though, with smaller quantities of chemicals. They will actually explode under the right conditions. It made a cool party trick.. We would put a small tube of the stuff in the room and walk out. After a few minutes, it would sound like gun fire and a produced a cloud of what I assume was straight CN.

      I also got a vinegar and baking soda bomb to work as a kid. I poured the soda into a loose plastic bag, rolled it up, and slipped it into a 2L bottle with about 250mL of vinegar. Shook it up and watched the pressure build. It took awhile, but it eventually split the bottle.

      And if you're getting 20% muratic acid, you can do much better than that with the right supplier. I believe we were buying 100% HCl for use in acid washing plaster pools. The stuff is so miserable that the cloud vapor it produces will condense in your sweat and burn you. We had to keep a garden hose running at all times to deal with the inevitable splashes and burns we would get.

    6. Re:Better than vinegar and baking soda! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even better than that is pool shock and brake fluid. It'll blillow HUGE clouds of smoke for about 45 seconds (chlorine gas) then burn for 3-5 minuites. If you put it in something to direct the flames(like a pringles can) you can shoot the flames 15-20 feet in the air. Lots of fun.

    7. Re:Better than vinegar and baking soda! by BlueFashoo · · Score: 1

      Fuming HCl, at the least the stuff I use at work, is about 35% IIRC.

      --
      Nice Marmot
  19. Chem teacher + Sodium = fun by Niahak · · Score: 1

    After we had had some fun with some sodium and potassium in small quantities (less than 1g) my Chem teacher decided there wasn't any left and dumped the small amount left (Stored in hexane!) into the sink. The sink had a small amount of water in it. Small explosion occurred, and the hexane floating on the water caught fire. Thus, the sink appeared to be on fire. Completely unintentionally. This during his evaluation... Naturally, that was the most fun chem lab we ever did.

    1. Re:Chem teacher + Sodium = fun by MtViewGuy · · Score: 2

      I've played with sodium metal and potassium metal in my high school Chemistry class.

      I dropped a very small amount of sodium metal in a 250 ml beaker of water and there was a very loud fizzing sound as the sodium dissolved quickly in water. But dropping the same amount of potassium metal into water has MUCH more violent effects--I heard a loud "pop" and you saw a flame above the potassium metal sliver as it dissolved in water.

  20. Lye, drain cleaner... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't go jumping in the pond immediately after doing this

    No shit... it'll dissolve yer freakin' skin and hair off.

    1. Re:Lye, drain cleaner... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that your scientific opinion?

  21. Warning! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You might not want to buy any property from this guy! Who knows what the hell is in his soil/house/lake.

    And for goodness sake, take cover if he moves into your neighborhood! This is like the story's my Dad told me about his "stupid friend who flunked out of his chemistry program". The one that grossly underestimated his own stupidity and blew his house off of his foundation.

  22. Re:Argh by cetan · · Score: 1

    I should say, it can't be larger than 60MB in total filesize...but I doubt that it is.

    --
    In Soviet Russia...michael would be rotting in Siberia!
  23. Links to video clips by jsse · · Score: 2

    for i in `seq -w 1 12`; do wget -b -t 0 http://www.theodoregray.com/PeriodicTable/Stories/ 011.2/Videos/SodiumResearch$i.MOV; done

    Yes, I must admit, I do that solely out of jealous of his private lake.

  24. Cool by Hi_2k · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of the old film "The Periodic Table" or something like that that I had to watch 3 times in chemistry. The one with the guy with the funny british accent and the odd elements with legs. They had a cool demonstration, reacting the diff metals like it one by one. Neat how it skipped. another great part, the diamond being disolved. especialy once you realized the background music was the theme to bonds "Diamonds are forever".

    --
    When life gives you crap, Make Crapade.
    Sluggy Freelance.
    1. Re:Cool by ShadowBlasko · · Score: 1

      Ahhh .. Professor Julias Sumner Milner. Gods I used to love to watch that show. He screwed up more times than he got it right (although, looking back now, I suppose he did it intentionally)

      Loved the one where he splashed the liquid nitrogen on his rubber gloves. oopsies! kids, don't try this at home, now where did I leave that hammer?

      He is still (IMHO) the perfect "nutty professor/not exactly evil, but scary to leave alone" ... I always picture him when I read "He's a nice guy, I just would not want to see him working with sub-atomic particles"

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order- Ed Howdershelt Via Tass
    2. Re:Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      al-u-min-i-um? Was this the same film that also showed him placing alkaline metals in a ceramic toilet bowl full of water?

    3. Re:Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wasn't that on one of those giant video disc things? (laserdisc i mean)

    4. Re:Cool by Hi_2k · · Score: 1

      Exactly, i always laughed at that bit. My science prof always warned of the accent, he said "Its in a foreign language, English"

      --
      When life gives you crap, Make Crapade.
      Sluggy Freelance.
  25. $100 for 3.5 pounds? I've got a bridge to sell. by Nonesuch · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Wow, did they ever overpay!

    Bulk metallic sodium runs under a buck per pound (15 cents to a dollar), when you are buying a 300# drum. Prices in smaller lots and higher purity are slightly higher, ranging up to around $35/pound for analytical grade.

    The higher purity metal makes little or no difference when you are tossing it into a highly impure natural lake.

    1. Re:$100 for 3.5 pounds? I've got a bridge to sell. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya but see when joe blow buys 300 pounds of metallic sodium the FBI general harrasses the shit out of him...and should he happen to be muslim most likely detain him with out trail for the rest of his life.

      Man i'm so glad i live in america where the government can't just snatch you up and lock you away for life just becuase of your religion...

      oh..wait...

    2. Re:$100 for 3.5 pounds? I've got a bridge to sell. by Zillatron · · Score: 3, Informative
      Prices in smaller lots and higher purity are slightly higher, ranging up to around $35/pound for analytical grade.

      What am I missing here? $35 X 3.5 = $122.50

      Um... tell me more about that bridge of yours...

    3. Re:$100 for 3.5 pounds? I've got a bridge to sell. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So? Islam is the religion of evil ragheads and their American nigger cattle.

      We're already invaded and occupied by them, with our governments' consent, over here on the eastern side of the pond. Don't let it happen to you too.

    4. Re:$100 for 3.5 pounds? I've got a bridge to sell. by Monkeyman334 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Prices in smaller lots and higher purity are slightly higher, ranging up to around $35/pound for analytical grade.

      The $35 price he gave there was for analytical grade, that could maybe be used in a chemistry experiment or something where percent error becomes important. That quality of course doesn't matter if you're tossing it into a lake is his point.

    5. Re:$100 for 3.5 pounds? I've got a bridge to sell. by sql*kitten · · Score: 3, Informative

      What am I missing here?

      You don't need analytically pure sodium if all you want to do is blow stuff up, only if you're doing chemistry research. For the purposes of mayhem, much poorer quality sodium is quite sufficient.

    6. Re:$100 for 3.5 pounds? I've got a bridge to sell. by Stoutlimb · · Score: 2

      In all likelyhood, the industrial quality sodium is probably sold by the tonne, with a minimum one-tonne purchase order.

    7. Re:$100 for 3.5 pounds? I've got a bridge to sell. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm... A couple thousand pounds of sodium + Lake Michigan =

      Oh the possibilities. :)

  26. Lithium is more fun. by rrowv · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My dad worked for the space program on fuel cells for several years. They often had pounds and pounds of lithium to play with in the lake behind the company. They seemed to enjoy making little boats, packing them with as much lithium as they could hold, shiping them out, and throwing rocks at them until it exploded when the boat capsized. They had sodium too, but lithium made a much bigger and louder explosion.

    1. Re:Lithium is more fun. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      Your dad is the reason why we'll never make it to Mars. Thanks a lot, rrowv's dad.

    2. Re:Lithium is more fun. by jonnythan · · Score: 2

      Give me a break. I deal with calcium carbide and acetylene all the time. A bird would have some mad belching to do, but it wouldn't explode. You're totally full of shit.

    3. Re:Lithium is more fun. by lithiumcloud · · Score: 1

      Damn straight!

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    4. Re:Lithium is more fun. by Phil+Karn · · Score: 2

      Are you sure? Acetylene is pretty explosive when compressed, even when not mixed with oxygen. There's a lot of energy in that triple C-C bond.

      That's why acetylene tanks do not contain compressed gas, but rather acetylene dissolved in acetone.

    5. Re:Lithium is more fun. by Archon-X · · Score: 1

      Birds actually can't burp or fart. Feed your canary some softdrink, and watch it go feet up.

      My dad possibly exaggerated in a typical father-son style story, but hey, I'm always open for abuse.

    6. Re:Lithium is more fun. by themassiah · · Score: 1

      Just for the record, most birds can't belch. That's why when you feed a seagull alka-seltzer, it "pops".

      --
      - Sometimes you're the pidgeon, sometimes you're the statue.
    7. Re:Lithium is more fun. by tonekids · · Score: 1

      This was moderated to funny?

      A sickening act of cruelty is funny?

      Damn...I never thought that this would be my first Slashdot post.

      -Paul

    8. Re:Lithium is more fun. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Glad to see our tax dollars at work. Wasting money by doing senseless, dangerous, and just plain stupid things. If I was your father's boss, I would have told him the next time he sneezes wrong he's out the door. That's stealing and stealing government property I might add. No doubt his son is a complete dipshit too.

    9. Re:Lithium is more fun. by yellowcat · · Score: 1

      Lithium? The people at the space program needed massive quantities of Lithium?

      Why am I not surprised by this?



      --
      yellowcat ^_^ ??
    10. Re:Lithium is more fun. by cdrudge · · Score: 2

      He should have been more clear. Many species of birds can not release excess pressure by "burping". The bird explodes from the buildup of pressure, not from the gasses exploding. The same thing can be done with Alka-Seltzer.

    11. Re:Lithium is more fun. by Red+Rocket · · Score: 1


      My dad possibly exaggerated in a typical father-son style story, but hey, I'm always open for abuse.

      ...evidently. Especially if you had a father who enjoyed torturing animals.

      --
      - Hail to our fearless misleader! Fool speed ahead!
    12. Re:Lithium is more fun. by ninewands · · Score: 2

      I remember working as a lab assistant for Freshman Chem lab back in the late '60's. We would pack a baby food jar full of calcium carbide, pour it full of water then screw the lid on and toss it out the window of the lab (tehere was a fenced vacant lot behind the science building).

      About three minutes later, there would be a relatively large explosion as the acetylene decided it was too overpressured for its taste. Nevr broke anything but the baby food jars, but it sure rattled some windows.

    13. Re:Lithium is more fun. by Archon-X · · Score: 1

      ..just teling the story. It's a youth thing. You know, like catching insects. Maybe.

    14. Re:Lithium is more fun. by Tower · · Score: 1

      Must be for all of those ups and downs....

      --
      "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
  27. Oh dear, by Trogre · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I feel another Darwin Award coming on.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  28. Chemistry Stories... by Cyno01 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I remember sophmore year my chemistry teacher told us a story about sodium and why we couldn't use it. Apparently some years ago a student stole a whole log/rod of pure sodium and took it home with him, long story short he ended up in ICU for several weeks after shards of his toilet severd a few major arteries. He then proceded to tell us after a school board ruling all the sodium from all the schools was rounded up by the fire department to be disposed of. The fire department didn't know what to do with it. They went out to a small lake somewhere and tossed it out, the chunks of soduim skittered around the lake for quite a while and caused several thousand dollars of property damage to docks and docked boats. I'm not sure if this is true, he was a little off, but its plausible.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:Chemistry Stories... by Reece400 · · Score: 1

      We still use sodium at Canadian highschools,, i'm not sure if the teachers are supposed to, but they definatly do at my school...

      Reece,

    2. Re:Chemistry Stories... by brianerst · · Score: 0
      Oh yes, the joys of sodium...

      When I was in seventh grade, the eighth grade science teacher performed the standard "throw a chunk of sodium in the water bucket" experiment for one of his classes. This time, he was distracted by some goofus in the class and whacked off a piece that was a little TOO large. BIG boom...

      End result was the school was evacutated, the ceiling tiles were torched, and he singed off his eyebrows. (He looked rather ridiculous for some few weeks.)

      Amazingly, he not only kept his job, but the next year, when I was in his class, out came the water bucket and the jar of sodium... The chunk was small enough not to blow up the classroom, but it still made quite the pop and shot a quick burst of flame at least 3 feet into the air.

      I still remember hearing (for the first time) a teacher swear out loud in front of me. He felt his his face and said "At least this time, I've still got my god damn eyebrows..."

  29. I've seen this.... by Soko · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is the same guy that did the Periodic Table Table - see this story for how I got there.

    Anyway, the video of the sodium lump dancing around the lake in a chaotic and totally uncontrolled manner was fair enough warning for me. I'd hate for pure Na to hit something made of flesh. *shudder*

    So, our final reaction is:

    Curiosity(++Chemistry) + 100(Bucks) + EBay - GreyMatter => hazard 2(health) + fireworks(neato)

    Soko

    --
    "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    1. Re:I've seen this.... by Timmeh · · Score: 2
      Link for the Periodic Table Table: http://www.mathpuzzle.com/Periodic.htm

      I want to be just like this guy when I grow up. :D

    2. Re:I've seen this.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so the kid learns a very valuable lesson when he opens the Au (Gold) one. An even more valuable lesson when he opens the radioactive materials.

    3. Re:I've seen this.... by BluBrick · · Score: 2

      I don't want to grow up at all.

      So I can be just like this guy!

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
  30. But he does bring the butterflies... by Proquar · · Score: 1

    Ooooooooohhhhhh... pweedi budde'fwies!

    --
    ---- *dog sitting next to a computer, with his beady eyes shifting left to right*
  31. Not new by csnydermvpsoft · · Score: 1

    I remember watching a video with a guy doing this in my high school freshman physical science class four years ago. Not exactly new. Still very cool though. /me makes a note to himself to check current sodium prices on ebay.

    1. Re:Not new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no shit this isn't new. do you think that this dude, or the person who posted the story, or anybody reading the story thinks that the explosive reaction between sodium and water is new. things get put on /. because they are cool, not just because they are new.

      suck me, i've had a bad day.

  32. Darwin Awards by Devil's+BSD · · Score: 1

    Seriously though, it reminds me of Darwin Award where the guy had cesium...

    --
    I'm the Devil the Windows users warned you about.
  33. personal experience by orcaaa · · Score: 5, Funny

    From personal experienced, i have discovered that "Nobody messes with Sodium". I was once i chem lab, holding a jar containing Sodium with oil(cant remember why), and managed to drop the jar spilling the sodium all over the floor and some very small amount on my legs. Now i am left with a very bad scars on both my legs. So if anyone asks me to handle sodium again, i go Na !

    --
    -- Reality is just an extended dream.
  34. Re:Sad news ... Stephen King dead at 55 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While I appreciate the addition of the 'popcorn products' line, I have to admit that I just don't get it. A little help?

  35. I have a better teacher than you..... by landrocker · · Score: 1

    From reading all these replies from people using, 'less than one gram' of sodium in Chem I have to feel sympathy. My chem teacher did an experiment with us using a big hunk of the stuff in a container full of water with an upturned bucket over it. The bucket blasted off about 5 metres into the air, although me, being in the front row, was showered with little bits of sodium.

    1. Re:I have a better teacher than you..... by Jacer · · Score: 2

      My advanced chem and physics class had 3 students, me and two of my friends. Class was 50% screw off, and 50% work, fairly easy too, well, the last week of class, our teacher gave us a fist sized chunk of potassium(!) we only had to promise three things, not to get caught, not to do any *real* damage, and to video tape it.....well, we killed all sorts of fish....if that's real damage i don't know

      --
      --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
  36. Needs Strong Acids now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that his lake is basic. (Assuming that the lake is small (like a pond), and he had enough sodium to make it notably basic (like PH 9 or 10+), I am not sure how much sodium that would take. (IANAC, amazingly)

    Then, it would be wild to see him pour a strong acid into the lake... :-) Maybe, put it in a container that will be slowly eaten away by the base of the lake. :-) Then, there should be a really exciting reaction (or nothing... not really sure actually. :-))

    Personally, Sodium (and sometimes potassium) are fun when you can get your hands on it. Chief recommendation though... use it in small amounts, and if done properly it makes a nice "lake candle". Also, don't use potassium unless you have a very high speed vehicle, and a way to launch it far from where you are (Potassium explodes more then Sodium does.

    Also, while that much sodium can "take out a house" under the right conditions. Those exact conditions are not likely to happen.

  37. Stored Under Oil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sodium is stored under oil ( sometimes Hexane ) to stop it from coming into contact with air, and oxidising.

    -- C.

    1. Re:Stored Under Oil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He can't remember why he was holding it, not why it was stored under oil.

  38. And another by phorm · · Score: 3, Funny

    We had fun experiments in High School with small bits of sodium (I'm fairly sure it was sodium) on a container of water, under he fume hood. The prof mentioned that at one time apparently one student tried to snitch some of the material to take home (and, presumably, apply with water). About partway through class he started getting paranoid and had the feeling that his pockets were getting hot (from his sweat?). He took a bathroom break and flushed the evidence.

    There wasn't a whole lot of sodium, but apparently it blew up a certain amount of piping... I'd image that he spent a lot of time in detention after that.

  39. Mmmmm.. salt and vinegar chips by Proquar · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Why are people getting so grumpy with this guy?

    Isn't what he did funny, at worst? He didn't ruin anyone else's land... and maybe his next trick will be with sulfur or chlorine, or so... and then the lake won't be so basic.

    Long live idiotic experiments! It's the unethical and moronic that make the best breakthroughs in science.. (not that I'm calling this experiment a 'breakthrough'.. I'm just saying, moronic is good when it comes to new 'experiments' or data gathering.)

    --
    ---- *dog sitting next to a computer, with his beady eyes shifting left to right*
  40. Seen something like that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last year, our Chemistry AP teacher showed us a video of some guy dumping a couple pounds of sodium into a polluted, acidic (basic? I don't remember any chem now) lake, also exhibiting the "cannon" effect. Quite cool.

  41. rowed away by 5alligator · · Score: 1

    *really* bad time to tip the boat!

  42. Why is this cool? by postman · · Score: 0

    I like fire and explosion as much as the next guy, but this is out and out criminal. If W.R. Grace was found dumping metallic sodium into a pond Slashdot readers would whip themselves into a rabid frenzy.
    Ask this super genius to post some photos of the pond three months from now, esprecially those plants we see in the background.

    1. Re:Why is this cool? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RFTA idiot

    2. Re:Why is this cool? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its not illegal,

      you can blow stuff up if you live out in the middle of no where, no danger to others, no laws broken in OBTAINING explosives.

    3. Re:Why is this cool? by Latent+IT · · Score: 5, Informative

      I like fire and explosion as much as the next guy, but this is out and out criminal. If W.R. Grace was found dumping metallic sodium into a pond Slashdot readers would whip themselves into a rabid frenzy. Ask this super genius to post some photos of the pond three months from now, esprecially those plants we see in the background.

      Sigh.

      First of all, thanks for being the one millionth customer with the same post. Yes, yes... three pounds of sodium. Indeed, a worldwide ecological disaster. I only hope people like you can save us.

      Do you have the slightest idea what the effects of 3 pounds of sodium would be? Actually, lemme be more clear. Do you have the slightest idea what the effects of 3 pounds of sodium would be on 23,550 cubic feet of water would be? (I'm assuming 100 foot diameter lake, 3 feet deep. It's probably bigger.)

      Hint: A cubic foot of water weighs 62.4 lbs.

      3 pounds.

      1469520 pounds.

      Why, for the record, you'd have a 2 ppm solution of sodium. Assuming the lake was distilled water. Very likely it wasn't. Change in PH?

      0.

      NADA! NONE! ZEEEEERRRRROOOOO.

      And that 0 change assumes that the lake is somehow a sealed system, and this sodium would somehow stay there forever. Where do you think the sodium came from, anyway? We imported it from Mars to cause danger to our planet?

      It's all over the place! Honestly, he could have caused more damage to the long term health of that lake with three pounds of milk. Or even dead fish.

      Frigging super genius.

    4. Re:Why is this cool? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idiot.

      And who the fuck is W.R. Grace?

      Ass.

    5. Re:Why is this cool? by dstone · · Score: 4, Funny

      RFTA idiot

      RFTA? Really Fucked The Acronym?!

    6. Re:Why is this cool? by dumbunny · · Score: 1

      2 ppm sodium in distilled water raises the pH from 7 to 8.3, doesn't it? That's a very noticeable change in pH. It's about the same, but opposite, pH effect as putting 3 pounds of chlorine in a swimming pool. No change in pH? There is empirical evidence to the contrary.

    7. Re:Why is this cool? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you his neighbor ?
      Perhaps its your land abutting his ?
      Im sure when he sells he will be sure to document what he has done to the new owners ?
      Plus i doubt what he does next is less, always has to be bigger and better.

    8. Re:Why is this cool? by noackjr · · Score: 1

      Considering pH = -log(H+ concentration), a change of 2 ppm (2e-6) is *very* significant. This works out to a change in pH of over 1.3 to ~5.67 (assuming a start at 7), definitely enough to kill amphibians and most fish. However, the pond is most likely buffered by organic processes that would lessen the impact.

    9. Re:Why is this cool? by jlseagull · · Score: 3, Informative

      Change in PH?

      0.

      NADA! NONE! ZEEEEERRRRROOOOO.


      Do you really believe this, or are you trolling? There is a noticeable effect on the pH. Assuming you're serious, one can calculate it.

      Consider a 30m diameter lake 1m deep on average. That's 707m^3 of water, weighing 707e6 grams. Water is 10g/mol, so 707e5 mol of water.

      Sodium ionizes into Na+, freeing an electron. So one mole of electrons are freed for each mole of sodium. 3lb=1364g=124mol OH-.

      That's a ratio of 1.75e-6 OH-/H2O. Normal water has a concentration of 1e-7 OH-/H20, so add the two to get the total concentration C, and -log C = pOH = 5.73, so pH = 14-pOH = 8.26.

      The ideal range for aquatic life tilts toward the basic: 6.5 to 8.5, so he should be OK. Ten pounds would probably have some undesirable effects, however. He is right about the stupidity of no lower limit on reportable releases of sodium - hell, salting the roads in winter is a release of hundreds of tons (though excess salinity has its bad effects as well).

      look here for more information.

      --
      'Be always mindful, even when ditch-digging.' --D. T. Suzuki
    10. Re:Why is this cool? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the text said that the pond has a surface area of 1.5 acres. One acre is 43,560 square feet. 1.5 acres is 65,340 square feet. Let's assume an average depth of 5 feet for this pond.

      65,340 x 5 = 326,700 cubic feet of water

      326,700 x 62.4 pounds = 20,386,080 pounds of water.

      20 million pounds of water to 3 pounds of impure sodium.

      Yes, it will raise the pH. How much depends on a lot of variables. It probably won't be much.

      The only thing that might happen is that an abrupt pH change might do is confuse the fish and start them breeding during an improper season.

      BTW, it is common practice, especially in small lakes in the northeast U.S., to lime the lakes to offset acid runoff from soil. They've been doing it for over 100 years. It has nothing to do with acid rain, but tannic acid from fallen leaves (mostly Oak).

      C14 H10 O9 -

    11. Re:Why is this cool? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Water is 10g/mol
      No, it's not. It's 18 g/mol (O=16, H=1,
      atomic numbers and weights aren't the same, you know)

      3lb=1364g=124mol.
      Again, you're confusing atomic weights and numbers.
      For sodium, the weight is 23 u.
      That should be 1364/23 = 59 moles.

      The /. crowd needs to brush up on their chem skillz.

    12. Re:Why is this cool? by Inda · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Do you have the slightest idea what the effects of 3 pounds of sodium would be on 23,550 cubic feet of water would be?

      To be totally honest with you: I have no idea. I don't even have the slightest idea. Guess that makes me stupid too.

      Hint: A cubic foot of water weighs 62.4 lbs.

      Nope. Still no idea, although I expect this is a very good hint.

      What a strange set of numbers. How on earth do you remember that? How on earth can you possibly get your head around the calculations?

      It's times like this I'm glad I'm stupid and use the metric system.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    13. Re:Why is this cool? by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 2

      God, if it's not one fuck-up it's another.

      If you're adding Sodium, the water's going to head toward alkalinity - so your number there should be "~8.33" not "~5.67."

      --
      ± 29 dB
    14. Re:Why is this cool? by haggar · · Score: 1

      Actually, neither RTFA or RFTA are acronyms. They are just initialisms. An acronym is an abbreviation that is "pronounced as a word". For example: SPICE, ARM, SCSI, RAM are acronyms. CIA, RTFM, USA are initialisms but not acronyms.

      --
      Sigged!
    15. Re:Why is this cool? by wilper · · Score: 1

      I like fire and explosion as much as the next guy, but this is out and out criminal. If W.R. Grace was found dumping metallic sodium into a pond Slashdot readers would whip themselves into a rabid frenzy. Ask this super genius to post some photos of the pond three months from now, esprecially those plants we see in the background.


      Won't it be winter by then, and the plants are dead/sleeping anyway?

    16. Re:Why is this cool? by Latent+IT · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Since your calculations were pretty much the best (though an AC did correct your final molar results), I'll reply to yours, rather than one of the other 8 people yelling at me. ;p

      The thing is, you're assuming distilled water. I admit to saying distilled water, but I wasn't really assuming his lake was distilled (for obvious reasons) but I meant that if you combined x sodium with y distilled water, you would end up with a z ppm solution.

      A real lake, however, ain't.

      I really do believe with the concentration of tannic acid, decaying organic material, and soil interaction of any normal lake, a PH measurement of a lake before throwing in a nice sodium rock and another PH measurement the day after would show a change of 0. It's amazingly hard to change the PH of organic rich water. I don't really have math to back this up, but I do have extensive fishkeeping experience. PH up and PH down are pretty much bunk as products, unless used *very* regularly, as the PH will find its way back to where it started really, really fast. And that's only in 30-100 gallons of water.

      And yeesh, as far as excess salinity... I have to dump 7 pounds of salt into 25 gallons of water to recreate the ocean. That's a little bit more than 2 ppm. (though someone with the actual dimensions of his lake worked out .13 ppm.) So yeah, even less. I can't think of a single freshwater fish that can't acclimate (easily) to a teaspoon of salt per gallon.

      Do you really believe a PH of 8.26 would result? Because... that's just wacky.

    17. Re:Why is this cool? by dumbunny · · Score: 1

      Most of us aren't disputing the conclusion that the lake's pH won't change noticeably. My source of irritation is that you used faulty analysis to support your conclusion ... and then your posting got moderated up to 5(!) I mean, his is "News for Nerds" -- you can't get away with using faulty analysis here. Right?

    18. Re:Why is this cool? by Latent+IT · · Score: 2

      My source of irritation is that you used faulty analysis to support your conclusion ...

      This from the dumbunny who compared it to 3 pounds of chlorine in a swimming pool? At least I compared actual numbers of the actual things involved, illustrating that the ammount of water was more than five hundred thousand times greater than the ammount of sodium being introduced. What's faulty about that? How was it incorrect?

      jlseagull: That's a ratio of 1.75e-6 OH-/H2O. Normal water has a concentration of 1e-7 OH-/H20, so add the two to get the total concentration C, and -log C = pOH = 5.73, so pH = 14-pOH = 8.26.

      postman: Ask this super genius to post some photos of the pond three months from now, esprecially those plants we see in the background.

      Anonymous Coward: Yes, it will raise the pH.

      noackjr: Considering pH = -log(H+ concentration), a change of 2 ppm (2e-6) is *very* significant. This works out to a change in pH of over 1.3 to ~5.67 (assuming a start at 7)...

      SmittyTheBold: If you're adding Sodium, the water's going to head toward alkalinity - so your number there should be "~8.33" not "~5.67."

      And then...

      dumbunny: Most of us aren't disputing the conclusion that the lake's pH won't change noticeably.

      Lets see if you can find *my* source of irritation.

      And by the way, clearly it's my fault for how my post got modded. Right?

    19. Re:Why is this cool? by Latent+IT · · Score: 2

      It appears that W.R. Grace is a fairly large chemical company.

      What the poster neglects to realize is that as a large chemical company, if they were dumping sodium, they'd probably have an actual *statistically significant* ammount of sodium, and dump it in a non-private river, like the Mississippi.

      Some people just really enjoy wearing blinders, I guess.

    20. Re:Why is this cool? by postman · · Score: 1

      OK, Mr Equilibrium thermodynamics, now that you're done showing us what an intellect you are, let's see how good you are at the following calculation.
      How long will it take the NaOH generated here to dilute uniformly through the lake? Because between the time the metal hits the water and the infinite dilution, there will be a plume of concentrated NaOH. This, by the way, is why chemists use stir bars, but I didn't see one used in this experiment. Go ahead and pull out your Brownian diffusion coefficients to impress us. Next, come up with some sort of model regarding the shape and concentration distribution of the hydroxide with respect to time.
      With your impeccable reasoning, I conclude that the dispersal of any amount of any pollutant matters because the volume of the earth is enormous.

    21. Re:Why is this cool? by Latent+IT · · Score: 2

      Yes, yes. Of course you're right. And if I walk behind a car, I'll just drop down dead from the carbon monoxide concentrations, right?

      A) Fish swim. If they approach an area of water that makes them uncomfortable, they will turn around.

      B) The sodium *explodes*. That may help in stirring, somewhat.

      C) Oh please. Don't try to save yourself. You're the rocket scientist that wants to see pictures of this lake in three months. Now you're concerned about the short term more? Boy, you dropped your origional position like a hot potato and picked this one up pretty quick. I'm sure you've given it just as much thought as your first. Why don't you try a little excercise - reason it out, try to figure out what will happen, and why, and *then* join in the conversation, not before.

      Mr Equilibrium thermodynamics indeed. Get that high school diploma, okay?

    22. Re:Why is this cool? by dumbunny · · Score: 1

      LatentIT, this is what you wrote:

      Why, for the record, you'd have a 2 ppm solution of sodium. Assuming the lake was distilled water. Very likely it wasn't. Change in PH?

      0.

      NADA! NONE! ZEEEEERRRRROOOOO.


      You were stating that the change in pH is zero of a 2 ppm sodium solution of distilled water. There is no other reason for you to use the sentence fragment, "Assuming the lake was distilled water," in that paragraph. Without that sentence fragment in there, nobody would have responded.

      Did you really mean to say that because the solution is lake water (and, hence, buffered), the pH change is close to zero? If this is what you meant, you should have been more clear. Honestly, you made it sound like you didn't understand the pH scale at all.

    23. Re:Why is this cool? by Latent+IT · · Score: 2

      There is no other reason for you to use the sentence fragment, "Assuming the lake was distilled water," in that paragraph.

      Well, there is. I used it because that would be the only way it would be a perfect 2 ppm solution of dissolved sodium in water. I thought that was taken care of by the very next sentence, which as you pointed out is: Very likely it wasn't.

      For the record, it was supposed to be sarcasm. You know, yes indeed, a lake filled with distilled water. Okay there, buddy.

      Contrary to what you and I know to be true, I *guarantee* you that many of these other people really expect dead acid-eaten fish. (I'm sure the explosion got one unlucky bugger though.) Postman, the bright boy that he is, keeps pushing the issue.

      Summary? You're right. I'm right. We're right all around, just not talking to each other about the same thing. Let's just hug and make up, so I can get back to poking fun at environmental reactionaries, okay? =p

    24. Re:Why is this cool? by postman · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why it's so important to you to attack other people, but I'm always happy to help my fellow man. Especially someone that apparently has got their high school diploma, unlike me.
      I never said anything about fish or the long term. I never called metallic sodium a carcinogen or a long term environmental pollutant. I asked for a photo of the plants in the background which in 3 months will all be dead from the hydroxide, along with anything on the bottom of the lake in the vicinity of the blast.
      We both know how useful that explosion will be in mixing the entire lake volume so let's drop that one
      I have tried an exercise, namely I have added concentrated solutions of NaOH to solutions of organic molecules (e.g. proteins, DNA) and seen _local_ denaturation/hydrolysis arising from amounts of hydroxide that negligibly alter the overall pH. So again, thanks for calculating the final pH of the solution. Your original ppm thing was nice too, as it showed that you're not a chemist, so I could count on you running from the challenge that I posed today, namely estimating the plume that would result from this explosion.
      The walk behind the car thing is just bizarre, I have no idea what you're talking about.
      And I haven't dropped my original position. I still don't see why this is cool. the flash and bang are nifty but they cause real environmental damage.

    25. Re:Why is this cool? by Psion · · Score: 2

      Um...let's put this into perspective, shall we? In three months, it will be winter in the northern hemisphere (I'm making an assumption that this is where this fellow's pond is, since the article itself seems to be slashdotted), and there'd be no point to taking a photo since the plants will be dead/dormant. Come back in roughly one year and take your picture.

    26. Re:Why is this cool? by Latent+IT · · Score: 2

      Don't worry, this is the last of my time I'm willing to waste on you. Enjoy it whie you can, and don't expect any more followups to your amazingly illogical arguements. ;p

      I never said anything about fish or the long term.

      Yes, you did. You think that all the plants will be dead from hydroxide in three months. That's long term. It's amazingly wrong, but it's certainly long term.

      We both know how useful that explosion will be in mixing the entire lake volume so let's drop that one.

      Yes, we do. I also know that in very little time (so much less than three months, it's not even funny) it will have mixed completely. One day with even mild wind will drum up the motion of a while lot of stir bars. Your thinking indicates that you think this lake is in a jar on your desk somewhere.

      So again, thanks for calculating the final pH of the solution.

      Funny. I don't remember doing that. Did I do that? Hell, I didn't do that.

      I have tried an exercise, namely I have added concentrated solutions of NaOH to solutions of organic molecules (e.g. proteins, DNA) and seen _local_ denaturation/hydrolysis arising from amounts of hydroxide that negligibly alter the overall pH.

      Okay, here's your experiment, if you're actually misguided, and not just being an idiot. Take 10,000,000 drops of water. Keep careful count! Then take one drop of NaOH. Give it a good shake, and water a tree with the results. If it's an apple tree, send me some apples, and I'll happily eat them. Don't hold your breath waiting for the tree to die, either.

      I could count on you running from the challenge that I posed today, namely estimating the plume that would result from this explosion.

      Gosh! Did I leave your childish demands off my to do list today? How strange. If you're really serious, send me a GPS map of his lake and the surrounding area, soundings of the lake as a one foot grid, as well as wind, humidity, heat, and every other conceivable condition for this day you'd like me to simulate. Also include a $500 in small bills for my time, and I'll cook some numbers for you for a day that will be nothing more than a rapidly dispersing cloud dropping to undetectable levels of NaOH after hours, if that long.

      In the meantime, just beacuse I don't do your science homework for you doesn't mean I'm 'running from your challenge', eh?

      The walk behind the car thing is just bizarre, I have no idea what you're talking about.

      I think you do, but I'll explain anyway. You think things need some kind of magic miracle to dilute/disperse. They really don't. By your logic, standing 10 feet behind a car at the right angle is just as dangerous as having your lips to the exhaust pipe. It's not.

      the flash and bang are nifty but they cause real environmental damage.

      Not any more than say, walking across a field, trampling those poor defenseless blades of grass. And that's the whole point.

    27. Re:Why is this cool? by noackjr · · Score: 1

      Yep, I'm a dumbass. Thanks for the polite way of pointing that out ;-).

    28. Re:Why is this cool? by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      I was feeling somewhat cranky. I'm not normally such a bastard, honest. ;)

      --
      ± 29 dB
  43. Salt pool by Catskul · · Score: 2

    If your liquified salt pool is deep enough the sodium should be able to collect without being exposed to air prematurely. Since sodium is a metal and thus conductive, it shouldnt cause problems when it collects on the negative probe in the pool.

    --

    Im not here now... Im out KILLING pepperoni
    1. Re:Salt pool by uisqebaugh · · Score: 1

      Actually, molten salt is the standard way of producing sodium metal. But the usual method of production involves mercury for the electrodes. It's not difficult; it just requires hot salt and good seals to prevent leaks of gas or water.

  44. we do this shit every year at MIT by pioneer · · Score: 1

    big deal. we drop twice that into the charles river for the naive freshmen each year at MIT... i'm sure you can find information about it on google site:mit.edu

    1. Re:we do this shit every year at MIT by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 1

      Damn, now I need to get into MIT even more. Put in a good word for me or something, will ya?

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    2. Re:we do this shit every year at MIT by Kaz+Riprock · · Score: 1

      Well, that explains the condition of the Charles...

      --
      Mordor...a magical, mythical land where women are more rare than dragons--but where every man would rather find a dragon
    3. Re:we do this shit every year at MIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, Dan, you guys are too cool

      -AssMan

  45. The OSS used sodium metal & potassium tabs in by rhodesbe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I remember reading in an OSS history book about crude time bombs that were made using wine bottles filled with water and gelatin coated tablets of Na metal and/or Potassium. The method was simple: Pop a couple of tabs in the bottle, roll it under a truck or other igniteable item, and you have a half-hour to get away before the water dissolves the tablet casing. The USAAF dropped cases to the French resistance, who used them to little or no effectiveness- not entirely unexpected French-like bevaior.

  46. My Chem teacher did that by freakyfreak2 · · Score: 3, Funny

    My HS chem teacher does that for the 4th of July at his cabin. He was the kind of teacher that did any experiment that made something blow up. Now he is in college again to become a pharmacist. I am very afraid for the world now.

  47. Fun With Alkali Metals by genomicon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sodium is the second lightest of the alkali earth metals. Interestingly, it is the cheapest metal money can buy. Light enough it would float on the water, if it weren't for the aforementioned explosiveness of such contact. Interestingly, the spontaneous reactivity of the alkali metals increases as a function of their weight ... cesium and francium are much more dangerous (or fun, depending on your PoV.)

    1. Re:Fun With Alkali Metals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interestingly, it is the cheapest metal money can buy

      Then why is Iron (steel) needing tarrif protection?

    2. Re:Fun With Alkali Metals by rhodesbe · · Score: 1

      Because you don't use Na metals to build cars, machine tools or skyscrapers.

    3. Re:Fun With Alkali Metals by Student_Tech · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why not? Could you imaging a car made out of Na running into a river? You wouldn't have to worry about drowning in it. On the other hand there might not be anything left in said car to recover....

    4. Re:Fun With Alkali Metals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A function of its weight is a little misleading. It is more appropriately a function of the distance of the outer electron from the nucleus and shielding and a bunch of other factors.

    5. Re:Fun With Alkali Metals by DosGusanos · · Score: 1

      Raw sodium blocks will float... if packed in mineral oil. That's how my uncle's buddy used to get it from work. They would float, fizzle as the oil wore off, then explode. I have fond memories of chemistry lessons watching those two throw the sodium into a local lake. They also had a trick where they mixed (I believe - open to correction) red phosphorous and trisodium phosphate, put this mix into vitamin capsules, and threw those at solid objects. Think "party snappers" x 100.

  48. ummmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so, how is this new or used for data gathering? Your opinion is a sham, me thinks.

    Here's one that may prove useful, however.

    Stick your head in the toilet and I'll run right over to pull it out...see how long you can last without breathing before I get there. Fun, no? Moronic, yes? Good, eh? Idiotic...of course!

    1. Re:ummmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate Anonymous Cowards!

  49. Only an honorable mention by Gerry+Gleason · · Score: 2
    Since he didn't die, but this one is for real. I've seen the video, and why (how?) would you fake something like that.

    I'm pretty sure they try to filter out the urban legends, but they do slip in. I had thought the one about strapping a JATO onto a car was true, but I understand that one was an urban legend. Or it maybe that the attribution of that story to the Darwin Awards was made up.

    1. Re:Only an honorable mention by cicatrix1 · · Score: 2

      They are all labled as to what the basis of the information is. There are basically 4 types: "Confirmed", "Unconfirmed", "Personal Account", and "Urban Legend".

      --

      I know more than you drink.
    2. Re:Only an honorable mention by tupps · · Score: 2

      The JATO story is semi urban legend. The guy who actually did this posted a story on the net correcting a number of facts about the story. Basically it is mostly correct except they were a little more controlled, it was done on train lines and the car ran into a block mine shaft that collapsed on the car. Some parts of the story are very accurate (eg car type and color) and other bits (smashing high up on a cliff) are not. Search for google on it, you should find the 'real' story.

      --
      Go out and get sailing!
    3. Re:Only an honorable mention by cookd · · Score: 1

      I saw a site "dedicated to telling the real story" behind that. I have no way to verify his "real story," but it sounds plausible enough to be true, and a lot more likely than the story on Darwin.

      Nobody died.

      Disappointing, yes, but at least it wasn't a tribute to man's stupidity. This kid's dad owned a junkyard/scrap shop. Somehow he got some JATO bottles (in trade for something else). The kid decided to make a vehicle that used the JATO. To make a long story less long, he got some decent advice from a brainy friend and ended up avoiding the whole suicide thing (just barely).

      It ran on an old mine shaft's railroad track. The first (and last) "flight" was unmanned. The vehicle (an old car fitted with railroad-style wheels) ended up stuck into the mineshaft, and the curve of the nearby road made it look like it had flown straight off the road into the mine shaft.

      --
      Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
    4. Re:Only an honorable mention by bobv-pillars-net · · Score: 1

      I read that story; it's very well done but obviously entirely fictitious. It's got holes you could drive that legendary car through.

      --
      The Web is like Usenet, but
      the elephants are untrained.
    5. Re:Only an honorable mention by CyPlasm · · Score: 1

      This is where you can find the "real" story.

    6. Re:Only an honorable mention by Gerry+Gleason · · Score: 2
      Yeah, I found the story. Way too long, skimmed some, but also very funny. I'm up way too late just reading it.

      Excellent piece of fiction if it isn't true, either way great story. Don't you want to ask the guy about the exact location and maybe send a 'team' to investigate. Nice touch about the skidmarks when they were hightailing it out of there making it look like the car left the road.

      I think they would deserve honorable mention for considering doing a manned flight.

  50. sodium fun by avandesande · · Score: 1

    When I worked in the chemical industry, we had to cut up the 12 pound ingots into little peices in the 'sodium room'. It was hard work and it was hair rasing when a drop of sweat fell on the ingot and sizzled. There is nothing quite like sodium dissolved in liquid ammonia....

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
    1. Re:Sodium Fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sodium is a DOT class 4.3 "Dangerous When Wet" "hazardous" flammable solid and so is prohibited from the USPS. This means that you'd have to jump through a couple of hoops to sell it on Ebay, such as posting "a clear notice of the hazardous nature of the material, and a description of the planned method of shipping that complies with the law".

    2. Re:Sodium Fun by mino · · Score: 1
      Anyone else curious as to how this guy managed to find an auction for sodium on eBay, the site that has a list of banned items longer than the entire list of auctions for "Star Wars" displayed on one page?

      Hot damn, you're right. ebay's banned item list is like a telephone directory (namely, a telephone directory for people who only make fun things). But I did find the following, under 'fireworks', which are classified as 'Prohibited' under ebay rules:

      Under California law, fireworks include "any device containing chemical elements and chemical compounds capable of burning independently of the oxygen of the atmosphere and producing audible, visual, mechanical or thermal effects which are useful as pyrotechnic devices or for entertainment."

      I mean... 'useful for entertainment' seems pretty accurate to me. Maybe not god's intended purpose for sodium, perhaps, but if he didn't want it to be used for entertainment, why did he make it so damn explosive? Why? Why? WHYYYYYY?

    3. Re:Sodium Fun by Wes+Janson · · Score: 1

      Someone was bored... ;) Similar to watching a bunch of teenagers playing with Black Cats.

    4. Re:Sodium Fun by terbor · · Score: 1
      Anyone else curious as to how this guy managed to find an auction for sodium on eBay, the site that has a list of banned items longer than the entire list of auctions for "Star Wars" displayed on one page? Hot damn, you're right. ebay's banned item list is like a telephone directory (namely, a telephone directory for people who only make fun things). But I did find the following, under 'fireworks', which are classified as 'Prohibited' under ebay rules:
      Under California law, fireworks include "any device containing chemical elements and chemical compounds capable of burning independently of the oxygen of the atmosphere and producing audible, visual, mechanical or thermal effects which are useful as pyrotechnic devices or for entertainment."
      To be truthful, a chunk of sodium as hardly a "device"
    5. Re:Sodium Fun by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 2
      Under California law, fireworks include "any device containing chemical elements and chemical compounds capable of burning independently of the oxygen of the atmosphere ....

      Sodium in mineral oil doesn't fit this description... Unless you ship it with water (a really bad idea). It's still a hazardous chemical, but it's not a firework because it won't burn as shipped.

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  51. Very tame.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    compared to the barrels of magnesium that I saw during a TLC/Discovery special on fires... This company had barrels filled with magnesium in oil, and something else caught fire. So the firemen, unaware of the Mg in barrels, start spraying water everywhere. Suddenly there's this TREMENDOUS white flash and defeaning boom, I mean we're talking lightning strike in daylight. See here for just a small amount of magnesium being sprayed with water.

    1. Re:Very tame.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      magnesium doesn't spontaneously combust in water unless it is already _really_ hot (i.e hot enough to reduce the water). By that stage, there isn't much that could stop it burning.

      I recall a news report during the Falklands war of the aluminium superstructure of a battleship burning after being hit by a missile. _That_ would have been very hot.

    2. Re:Very tame.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's it... It was hot... The warehouse was already on fire due to something else, and the firemen just continued pouring water on it because they couldn't let the rest of the stuff burn. So as the fire progresses, there's these immense flashes of white light with huge spark showers that shot like 40 feet in the air. Quite amusing. Usually people don't believe me when I tell this story because TLC only plays this special once a year, as opposed to their stupid baby/wedding shows which pollute that channel 4 hours a day.
      Another story no one believes is the freak in California who stole a TANK and takes a stroll downtown with it.

    3. Re:Very tame.. by alien-alien · · Score: 1

      Wow...The guy pouring water over the fire was completely vaporized!!

    4. Re:Very tame.. by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 2
      Another story no one believes is the freak in California who stole a TANK and takes a stroll downtown with it.

      I know that this occurred in Germany. The kid that did it, ended up overturning the tank into a water-filled ditch. I 'm not sure if he ended up drowning, but I do remember that there was some worry about his safety when he turned the tank over..

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    5. Re:Very tame.. by shaldannon · · Score: 2

      The California story is true. If you watch enough TLC "Bad Driver" or "Police" specials, you'll see it at least once. I've personally see the same show airing twice, and a variant running, in the last 6 months.

      Basically an ex-national guard guy with a beef with the local hospital sneaks onto the armory grounds and steals an M1A1 out from under their collective noses (can we say "curt-martial" boys and girls? good...I knew we could...)

      anyhow, he cut loose rampaging down city streets. they've gote some lovely helicopter footage of him taking out cars, vans, a full-size motor home, even a street light. he tried to take out a pedestrian bridge, and eventually ended up on the freeway, headed towards said hospital.

      The legions of following squad cars are something to see...rather like the 3+ hour hostage situation that recently occurred between Raleigh and Richmond on I-85...but I digress...

      At any rate, fearing that the police were going to catch him on one side of the freeway (mind, they were more nervous about the main gun pointing rearward at the squad cars), he tries to drive the tank over the center divider, high centering the beast in the process.

      A couple officers climbed up on the tank, and one who had guard experience opened the hatch. They ordered the guy to stop, but he just looked at them and laughed. Fearing for public safety (not to mention their own), one of the officers ended it with a lethal gunshot.

      I guess the moral of the story is don't steal an Abrams tank....

      --


      What is your Slash Rating?
  52. Re:Better than vinegar and baking soda!-Thermite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh I don't know. Magnesium and aluminium when mixed as a powder is fun. How many people have done the cryogenically frozen bannana as a hammer trick? Selenium melting like butter?

  53. Re:Great by jx100 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Or he used it all up a little too close to the comp.

  54. slashdot does it again. by mar1no · · Score: 0

    damnit, i really want to see this video. why must slashdot spoil everything. =(

    --
    "you sonofabitch i didn't know!"
  55. Lithium? by Erpo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Lithium was more reactive than sodium? It's the other way around. The reactivity of group 1A elements increases with period. Lithium is in period 2, sodium is in period 3. Cesium is the most electropositive element (i.e. the most entertaining/life-threatening when thrown into a lake) and occupies period 6. Francium (group 1A, period 7) would be more impressive, but it's so radioactive that even if you could scrape together a chunk of it, it would have decomposed into other elements before you got a chance to get it wet.

    Here's a fun site with a periodic table and details on all the elements.

    1. Re:Lithium? by rrowv · · Score: 1

      meh...I know about that, I suppose I should clarify a bit. The Litium was pure with nothing to keep it from reacting prematurely to water vapor in the air (like say mineral oil). The sodium on the other hand was usually stored with chemicals that stablized it and kept it from reacting to the outside air. The sodium probably gave out more energy, but since the lithium had nothing protecting it, it had a much quicker explosion.

  56. This helps people! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess the guy from this story has found a better way to blind cameras!

  57. Re:Argh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's called load balancing...it needs mirrors. Do you want to offer him some bandwidth?...if not, don't complain!...just be patient

  58. Enough w/ the pH crap by cthulhu2112 · · Score: 4, Informative

    3.5 pounds of sodium metal would not have that drastic of a long term effect on a pond. If the pond was 1000 liters in volume and had a pH of 7 (unlikely) the pH would rise to approximately 12 (1000 liters ~= 275 gallons.) A larger pond lets say 10000 (again not a very large pond/lake) gallons, with an initial pH of 7, would experience a rise in the pH of approximately 4 units. Now lets consider the fact that the water in the pond is probably buffered to some degree, the result of the sodium metal reaction would have even less effect. If the water has any metal in it to speak of, like something uncommon like calcium, or iron, or magnesium, the hydroxide ions produced by the sodium metal reaction would precipitate the metals in the water and the pH would be even less effected.

    1. Re:Enough w/ the pH crap by p3d0 · · Score: 1

      10,000 litres is a puddle. That's only 10 cubic metres of water.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    2. Re:Enough w/ the pH crap by cheezus_es_lard · · Score: 2, Interesting

      pH changes are incredibly dangerous for local wildlife and animal life (including fish, reptiles, AND mammals) who use the water as a drinking source.

      -- Taken from Acid Rain and North America:

      Scientists determine whether rain or lake water is acidic by measuring its pH (the measure of acidity or alkalinity of a solution on a scale of 0 to 4). A value of 7 is considered neutral, whereas values less than 7 are acidic and values over 7 are alkaline or basic. A change of one unit on the pH scale represents a factor of ten in acidity; for example, a solution with a pH of five is ten times as acid as one with a pH of six (Somerville, 1996, p.174).

      -- End Quote

      So for every point of pH increase, it's a factor of 10 increase in the effect.

      -- Same Source

      As lakes and streams become more acidic, the amount of fish, aquatic plants and animals that live in these waters decrease. Although some plants and animals can survive acidic waters, others are acid-sensitive and will die as the pH declines. Plants and animals living within an ecosystem are highly interdependent. If acid rain causes the loss of acid-sensitive plants and animals, organisms at all trophic levels within the food chain may be affected which then causes a disruption to the entire ecosystem.

      -- End Quote

      The same effects occur when the pH of a body of water becomes too basic. Acid-dependant creatures suffer and die. (hint: the human body requires a certain pH to exist. Raise or lower that pH to your peril!)

      -- Lifted from Wellness Garden:

      Nothing does well in an overly acidic or alkaline pH medium, least of all the human body! Just as acid rain can destroy a forest and alkaline wastes can pollute a lake, an imbalanced pH continuously corrodes all body tissue, slowly eating into the 60,000 miles of our veins and arteries like corrosives eating into marble. If left unchecked, an imbalanced pH will interrupt all cellular activities and functions, from the beating of your heart to the neural firing of your brain... An imbalanced pH interferes with all life itself!

      Although it may generally go unnoticed and undetected for years, an imbalanced pH (either consistently too acid or alkaline) leads to the progression of most, if not all, Degenerative diseases including Cardiovascular Disease (the #1 killer in the U.S.), Cancer (the #2 Killer in the U.S.), and Diabetes, as well as the never ending frustration of excessive systemic weight gain.

      -- End Quote

      -- cheezus_es_lard

    3. Re:Enough w/ the pH crap by guacamolefoo · · Score: 1

      If the pond was 1000 liters in volume and had a pH of 7 (unlikely) the pH would rise to approximately 12 (1000 liters ~= 275 gallons.)

      To hell with liters. This is a job for acre-feet!

    4. Re:Enough w/ the pH crap by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 2
      To hell with liters. This is a job for acre-feet!

      $ units acre-feet litres

      • * 1233486.8
      In other words, 1 acre at 10 feet deep would give you about 12million litres of water.
      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  59. Damns the /. effect... by Ecko_viLAn · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ...for I cannot look at the site and story!...
    nuff said.

    --
    If we don't end war, War will end us. - H.G. Wells
  60. Re:The OSS used sodium metal & potassium tabs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me guess, the germans didn't wait for half an hour after seeing a bottle being thrown under their trucks...

  61. Re:The OSS used sodium metal & potassium tabs by rhodesbe · · Score: 0, Troll

    actually, the French probably got so lit from drinking the wine to empty bottle that they lost all desire to win the war and just went back to surrendering.

  62. Sodium Fun by Wes+Janson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I shudder to think of the danger of my middle school science teacher leaving a jar of sodium in oil around the room for the better part of the year. It just sat there, and we didn't really know anything about it until she put some in a tray filled with water then put that on an overhead projector. Anyone else curious as to how this guy managed to find an auction for sodium on eBay, the site that has a list of banned items longer than the entire list of auctions for "Star Wars" displayed on one page?

  63. Say... by teslatug · · Score: 4, Funny

    What are the odds this guy makes it into Bush's axis of evil? :)

    1. Re:Say... by Sabalon · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sodium - Saddam ... they sound kinda close when you say them :)

    2. Re:Say... by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1

      Does he control any oil or other national resources that Bush wants?

  64. mindless thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sink a 5 gallon bucket of sodium to the bottom of the pond. Devise a way to rupture the buck when it reaches the bottom...I'd pay premium to see that on pay-per-view.

    1. Re:mindless thought... by sql*kitten · · Score: 2, Funny

      Devise a way to rupture the buck when it reaches the bottom

      How about some C4? Oh, wait...

    2. Re:mindless thought... by swillden · · Score: 2

      Sink a 5 gallon bucket of sodium to the bottom of the pond. Devise a way to rupture the buck when it reaches the bottom...

      Very easy, in fact you really don't have to do anything. Just use a large enough bucket so you can leave a significant air space around your sodium, make sure the bucket is sealed tight, and attach enough weight to sink it (you'll need about 8.5 lbs per gallon of enclosed air, roughly, including the weight of the bucket and sodium). I'd suggest using a float to support it while you get away, and puncturing the float with, e.g., a rifle.

      As the bucket drops through the water, external pressure will mount rapdly. As long as your bucket was really a bucket and not designed as a pressure vessel, it's unlikely to sink very far before rupturing. Ideally, use a bucket with a bottom that is a separate piece. If that bottom is 12" in diameter, by the time the bucket gets to 35 feet below the surface there will be 1700 pounds of pressure on it, and not much is going to take that.

      Just make sure your pond is deep enough or that your bucket is weak enough (or has any seam or crack that is weak enough), and you'll get a little water inside. Once a little water hits that sodium the rest of the bucket will come apart in a hurry :-) To make really sure the water gets in, maybe drill a hole in it and seal it up with something that is waterproof and will take a little pressure but not a lot.

      BTW, don't anybody really do this. It's fun to think about but it would really screw up the lake or pond, and might hurt you as well.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  65. True Sodium Story by unsinged+int · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm sure we're gonna get a lot of creative stories about sodium that aren't true, but this one is...

    First year of college, we had an explosion rock the entire dorm I was in. No one had any idea what the hell happened until someone ran through the hallway telling everyone they had to come upstairs.

    Well, I went up and saw an entire restroom covered in a fine white powder with even more powder floating in the air. There was an empty stall -- no toilet. Just a pipe (which amazingly enough was not pouring water everywhere...still can't figure that one out). There were no large chunks of ceramic (or whatever toilets are made of) or anything to be found anywhere.

    As far as I know, they never caught the guys who did it, but what happened was they flushed a good bit of sodium down the toilet. It was unbelievable to just see the pipe sitting there with no toilet attached. Even funnier was seeing the guys on the floor get rounded up and all of them saying they didn't know what happened. Somehow "I dunno, it just, like, blew up." didn't quite cut it.

    1. Re:True Sodium Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Just a pipe (which amazingly enough was not pouring water everywhere...still can't figure that one out)."

      You'd better hope that water wasn't pouring out. The "big pipe" is where the poo goes. Generally, it only goes down. (it is mostly filled with air when not being flushed.) If 'water was coming out', it would have been carrying the excrement of, perhaps, the entire dormitory. Bad.

    2. Re:True Sodium Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a pipe (which amazingly enough was not pouring water everywhere...still can't figure that one out).

      If your dorm was anything like mine, it wouldn't be quit so surprising. I'd be much more amazed at having a working toilet with no problems then having one explode.

    3. Re:True Sodium Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it was a urinal. But that was 31 years ago so you are forgiven. Go Huskies.

    4. Re:True Sodium Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "As far as I know, they never caught the guys who did it, ......... Even funnier was seeing the guys on the floor get rounded up and all of them saying they didn't know what happened. Somehow "I dunno, it just, like, blew up." didn't quite cut it."

      So which one was it...? Did they never get caught, or were they rounded up with all of them saying they didn't know what happened, an excuse which didn't quite cut it? Way to tell a true story!

    5. Re:True Sodium Story by KjetilK · · Score: 2
      Well, there is a lot of fun you can have with Sodium.

      Back in school, there was a big mark in the roof, after a guy that just came out from college was teaching a class, and got a little bit too eager with the Sodium. My teacher only took a small piece (looked cool), but this guy had apparently taken a major chunck...

      My father worked in a lab, and one night, the cleaning personell had thrown two small pieces of gray rock into the water they used for cleaning... They were quite surprised when it blew up, and it was probably the last time they'd touch anything in a chemistry lab...

      Finally, one of the kids in my class said that he once stole some Sodium at school, threw in a can of water and put the lid on. To his disappointment, nothing happened. So he went over to the can, and shook it. Then, something happened. Last time I met him, he still had both hands, though...

      --
      Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
    6. Re:True Sodium Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did not post the original article but I think I can answer the question.

      My old college roomate did it. He placed a chunk of sodium in the dorm toilet and flushed it. A few seconds later there was a soft thud and the wall mounted toilet simply dropped to the floor.

      Someone walked into the restroom per chance. His explanation to him was something like "I don't know how it happened. All I did was flush." The same explanation was given later to the janitor who seemed to believe him. I don't think the police were ever called. My roomate was never implicated in the crime.

      It was actually a relatively harmless prank. Another roomate had a chance encounter with a running chainsaw in the shower. Luckily the chain had been removed. Those were the days.

  66. Priceless!!! by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 3, Funny
    • 3 pounds of sodium: $125.22
    • Plot of land with pond in the Ozarks: $35,330.12
    • The face of the volunteer fire chief: priceless
  67. Regarding the state and the water supply. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I have no idea of the actual legal standing.. but I believe the state should have a right to determine what you can put in your own lake, as that water eventually ends up in other lakes in the country, and is ultimately part of the water supply.

    1. Re:Regarding the state and the water supply. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what a twit response... typical idiot liberal knee jerk, wot?

  68. Highschool by Drath · · Score: 2

    Isn't this incredibly old? I remember watching a movie of this in highschool.
    The server's slashdotted so I can't take a look, but if I remember the guy threw the brick of sodium in the lake and it blew itself up in the air since it was a solid object only the exposed portions of sodium reacted and continued "jumping" until all the brick was used up.

  69. Yet another still... by Cybrex · · Score: 1

    I had to take chemistry during summer school one year (Yeah, I'm a geek who failed high school chemistry. Sue me. I married a chemist to make up for it. :) ) and ended up with one of the most interesting teachers I ever had.

    Mr. B (I'll refrain from using his full name, but so that he recogizes himself if he's reading this he was an ex-cop who'd become a teacher after getting shot in the back. He taught summer school in Tampa in `87.) made otherwise boring subject matter interesting by peppering his lectures with personal anecdotes about how he'd utilized the chemistry we were being taught to raise hell in one form or another. They'd faked a gas leak in a chem lab and had the whole class pretend to be passed out (the teacher threw a chair through a window to try to ventilate the room faster), used miniature hot air balloons to drop m-80s into neighborhoods a few blocks down at 2am, and once wrapped a chunk of sodium in vaseline and flushed it down the school toilet, blowing out a good bit of the building's plumbing.

    I don't know how many of his stories were true or not (they sure seemed convincing at the time), but the class was a riot.

    -Cybrex

    --
    Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
  70. Mercury by Kyrn · · Score: 1

    See, they gave us mercury to play with, we were just told we'd have to spend a week cleaning it out of every crack in the floor if we spilled it.

  71. Depends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    If you are green peace, then the answer is :
    My god, you are dieing. You are heavily contaminaed and need to be buried in a lead container. Give me money.

    If you are a democrat, then the answer is :
    You poor person. We will look for the answer right away. We will create 100 new jobs to find the answer right away. 10 of those will be with janitors in my district.

    If you a republican, the answer is:
    If you are rich, then we will create 100 new jobs to find out why you are dieing. We will have to divert 70 researchers from SIDS, but we will find the answer.
    If you are from texas, wyoming, missouri, or utah, then we can divert money from elsewhere and hire another 100 just in these states.
    If you are poor, well, then .... FUCK OFF and go tell it somebody who cares.

    If you are a libertarian, then :
    You have insurance, they will pay for it. If not, then it is your fault.

    If you are just a normal US person, well, you are simply fucked and no better off than what you were prior to reading this (or any number of other posts here).

    enjoy the next elections.

  72. Re:The OSS used sodium metal & potassium tabs by GooberToo · · Score: 2

    Actually, I saw something about this not long ago on the History Channel. IIRC, they actually used condoms and dropped it into the fuel tank. Since the fuel will disolve the condom over time (some number of minutes), they had time to get away.

    Later, the US started dropping something else like a condom but provided for more reliable means and timing mechanisms. I just don't recall what it was that we started suppling exactly. Nonetheless, I am sure it was dropped into the fuel tank.

  73. In Other news..... by ep32g79 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Prices for "Sodium metal" on e-bay sky rocket!

  74. You're giving the rest of us evil ideas... by Kyrn · · Score: 1

    I live by the Mississipi. Now I'm thinking up plans. Would it be safe enough if you just threw it from the bridge? (or probably away from it too) The bank on one side of the river is rather steep... Blowing up the university might not be a horrible idea.

  75. No Carrier by Anonymous+Cowrad · · Score: 1

    ifconfig on a FreeBSD box with a dead ethernet link will give you status: no carrier

    Your mileage will undoubtedly vary on another os.

    --

    --
    pants ahoy
    1. Re:No Carrier by pyite · · Score: 1

      Makes sense as Ethernet uses Carrier Sense Multiple Access / Collision Detect.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

  76. Another fun story by dead+sun · · Score: 3
    My AP Chem teacher from a few years ago told this to me. I have no way of saying it's true, but it's almost one of those you'd have to try really hard to make up.

    Anyway, he was the chem head at a little high school at the time the story took place. I think it was in Kentucky but that hardly matters. They were doing the little bits of sodium in water thing and all the kids were greatly amused. One so much that he decided to lift a small stick of sodium, maybe half a pencil sized, from the oil filled jar. Apparently this story was used to get locks on the chemical cabinets at this school afterwards, and without locks the kid had fairly easy access.

    So the kid, not sure what to do with his treasure, puts the oil logged piece of sodium in a paper towel and puts it in his pocket. He wanders to the library as such to study hall. He's getting nervous because he just stole it and starts to sweat a little, and notices his pocket getting a little warm. After a while his pocket is getting really hot and he pulls out the sodium and tosses it on the floor, apparently allowing it to react a little with muggy air. It starts to flame and flare a bit and the kid, brilliantly, steps on it to try and put it out, like one might a small bit of campfire that fell out of the fire pit. So, you guessed it, his shoe now has putty-like sodium metal molded to it and he's kicking bits of it around the library, trying to get it off as it flares a little here and there. Another student sees the small fire flickering on his shoes, calmly goes to janitor's closet and gets the mop water. He then pours it on the sodium and sets it off really well, displaying why kids shouldn't have ready access to things like sodium.

    The bit I'm not sure about is why it started sputtering flame when he removed it from his pocket. Enough of the oil may have been absorbed into the poor fellow's pants and his sweat may have started it a bit, but I'm not sure if dry sodium metal would sputter in humid air. Nor have I had the chance to find out. The way he told the story though was quite funny, and none of us questioned it, so who knows.

    --
    If not now, when?
  77. Or, for that matter. . . by kfg · · Score: 1

    legs. Which are, by the way, always exuding water. . . containing small amounts of sodium chloride.

  78. Re:Argh by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 2

    This is not a sane system! What can be done?


    P2P...but it's gonna be one hell of a paradigm quake.

    --
    The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
  79. If you wanted to know what toilets are made of. . by kfg · · Score: 1

    you could have just anylized that white powder. You certainly had a few "chemists" available to you to do the work.

    KFG

  80. There was one foolish chap by pyman · · Score: 1
    who tried to sneak out some sodium from the science lab during class.

    Poor guy (not too bright) put the stuff in his trouser pockets... a few minutes later his pants were on fire!

    --
    a ^= b; b ^= a; a ^= b;
  81. Re:Whyyy by packeteer · · Score: 4, Informative

    I saw a science teacher at the middle school do this when i went there. He was also fond of displaying how any powder if ground fine enough will burn or explode. Like blowing a cloud of fine dust into a flame and having it explode.

    Back to the sodium. Sodium reacts with water very easily. Its a silver metal but just by the water in the air it turns a purplish color. This is the metal rusitng before your eyes.

    This sciene teacher put a chunk about as big as a shugar cube in water
    it kind of reacts and looks likeit boiling untill he threw a rock in the bucket. It make a huge "BOOM" and threw water around. He had us get very far away first.

    The funny thing baout sodium is because reaction with almost anything makes it burn its hard to store. Oddly enough karasin will not react with it so this teacher had a chunk as big as a small loaf of bread in a karasin filled jar.

    --
    unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
  82. Re:I've seen this....BOOM!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I want to be just like this guy when I grow up. :D "

    Don't you mean "Blow Up"?

  83. oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    jesus, give slashdoters high school level chemsitry topics and they suddenly become grande chemists and physicists.

  84. Touchpowder by blitz77 · · Score: 1

    How about touchpowder? Touchpowder is nitrogen triiodide. You can make it using NH3 and I2. Make sure you make it in a solution, as the water prevents it from exploding. When the water dries, merely touching the powder gives it enough energy to explode. Neat stuff. Make sure you make only a little of the stuff however. Really dangerous (and loud!) stuff.

    1. Re:Touchpowder by alouts · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Actually, I made this in my high school chem lab 10 years ago. I had a 3rd year biology class that was basically independent study with three of my friends and the once-a-week supervision of an assistant prof from the local college (we were doing simple gene splicing on bacteria to learn about hands-on genetics).

      Since they didn't have any space to set up lab equipment for us in a regular classroom, we ended up having our "classroom" in the chemical stockroom that adjoined two of the science classrooms. One of my friends got a hold of the anarchist cookbook, and we tried making all kinds of stuff from it, not realizing that a lot of the recipes in there were inaccurate. We made everything from simple gunpowder to nitroglycerine. At one point we had a little mishap where one of the bowls of gunpowder ingnited while both classrooms had students in them. Since we were all honor students, we got a slap on the wrist and continued on as if we never got caught.

      Eventually, we progressed to reading old chemistry teaching manuals and looking for experiments that were discontinued. Many were discontinued because the components were carcinogenic, but some were because they were deemed too dangerous. Thermite was one of them, Triiodide was another. If I remember right, NI3 is amazingly simple to make, I think you just mix Potassium Nitrate with crystallized iodine in a water (or was it alcohol?) solution, then filter out the precitpitate. As you mention, it's incredibly sensitive when dry, but if I remember correctly, is a fairly low power explosive. It doesn't put off the huge vapor ratios of your more common bomb ingredients, so aside from the surprise of setting it off, it's mostly harmless in small quantities. It is fun when it pops though, as it gives off a little *crack* sound and a little cloud of purple smoke from the iodine (probably semi-poisonous iodine gas, but unless you're deliberately sniffing it, it dilutes itself quickly enough to not be a real problem).

      Anyway, one day after playing around with it a couple times, we made a batch of this stuff after school had let out and while it was still wet smeared it in little patches all over the floor and chairs of the chem classroom that we had for our first period. The next day as people walked in the room, the were random cracks and pops as these tiny puffs of purple kept showing up on all around the classroom. Everyone was quite amused, but aside from the four of us, nobody knew what it was or where it came from. Eventually, at the end of the year right after we graduated we came back and told our chem teacher about all the crap we had done and explained the triiodide on the floors. He gave us a knowing little smirk and surprisingly didn't chastise us at all. 'Course he then proceeded to regale us with all his stories of college chemistry adventures...

      All in all, it was a pretty unique confluence of circumstances and provided far more consequence-free fun than I ever would have expected a bio class could.

    2. Re:Touchpowder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mixing wet NI3 and sugar to form a paste-like substance deposited in bottlecaps to dry leads to a suprisingly amusing way to rid a lab of pesky fruit flies from the bio building next door... ;-)

    3. Re:Touchpowder by Kazymyr · · Score: 1

      When I was in highschool, someone - who, me? nooooo... :) - made some NI3 and left little chunks of it, still wet, on the edges of several toilet bowls. That was good fun.

      --
      I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
  85. well, by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1, Troll

    he is stupid.

  86. Woah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He owns his own lake!

  87. Sodium Server... by Erik+K.+Veland · · Score: 1, Funny

    Looks like he dropped some in his watercooled server as well...

    --
    "I tend to think of OS X as Linux with QA and Taste", James Gosling, creator of Java
  88. MIRROR!!! with some 3 videos by KaosConMan · · Score: 3, Informative

    MIRROR HERE Its got graphics and video! Give it a second to load. If any one else has videos I can host.

    Send to s1394119(AT)cedarville.edu and I'll gladly post them.

  89. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  90. Sodium and toilets by Raindeer · · Score: 3, Funny

    When I was 11 my teacher in primary school told us about some of the stunts he and his friends had pulled in high school. One day they were shown the experiment with a sliver of sodium and some water. Not content with the small sliver and the small effect that it caused, they stole some of it from the classroom. The needed a place to do the experiment and figured a toilet bowl was a great place to try out. The effect was as many of us expected: explosion, toilet bowl wrecked, water bursting out of all the adjacent toilets. Unfortunately on the other side of the wall there were the teachers toilets. Ofcourse a teacher was sitting on the bowl when the explosion happened. :-) You can imagine what happened. They apparantly didn't get caught.

    1. Re:Sodium and toilets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, wasnt that a Simpsons episode?

    2. Re:Sodium and toilets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only where freedom is, can crime exist.

      Just needed to reply. This is wrong.

      After all, the Taliban was an opressive regime, and handled many crimes with capital punishment. Still, not only did they commit crimes themselves as corrupt "keepers of order," but they also didn't stop the occurance of all crime in their jurisdiction. Even though the populace knew of swift punishment, criminal acts were still perpetrated by a few.

      "Only where humanity inhabits, can crime exist."

      That should be the quote.

    3. Re:Sodium and toilets by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2


      SIMPSONS DID IT

    4. Re:Sodium and toilets by operagost · · Score: 1

      File under: how to turn public toilets into bidets.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    5. Re:Sodium and toilets by Rhonwyn · · Score: 1

      I'm fairly certain that one is an urban legend. I have heard the same story twice but with m80s and not sodium.

  91. Chem classess are still fun by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And you still get to play with things you shouldn't, if you have the right teacher. I've got a couple good stories from AP Chem at my high school, in 1996 and 1997.

    A favourite activity of kids in that class was filling balloons with oxygen, hydrogen and something else flamable, methane I think but I can't remember for sure. At any rate in 1996, year before I took it, the kids were doing this I believe as a prep for the magic show we put on for the elementry kids (we did it in 1997 too). Well they happened to set it up right under a sprinkler and it set it off, drenching them and setting off the fire alarm. The video of it (they were taping) was quite amusing.

    So in 1997 when I was there we did a few different things. One related to this whole sodium discussion. Allt he metals from that group were placed, in a very small quantity, in water to show the increase in reactivity. All were stored as small chunks in oil. Lithium just fizzed a little, sodium kind of half burned and exploded and so on up. However the Cesium was rather more reactive than the teacher expected, or perhaps she just grabbed too big a lump. IT ended up blowing the whole 2 litre beaker apart and scaring the shit out of everyone, her espically.

    She also told us that her son managed to make himself nice and sick to his stomach by drinking some fairly concentrated (like 6 molar) hydrochloric acid. See she used the little plastic chem bottles for water bottles in her house. For some reason, she had some HCl there one day, in the same bottle (storing acid was a common use for them in the lab). He didn't look at the lable and took a nice swig. Now HCl won't burn you like some, it's stomach acid, but that concentrated will cause a fair amount of dsicomfort.

    1. Re:Chem classess are still fun by Wavicle · · Score: 2

      She also told us that her son managed to make himself nice and sick to his stomach by drinking some fairly concentrated (like 6 molar) hydrochloric acid. See she used the little plastic chem bottles for water bottles in her house. For some reason, she had some HCl there one day, in the same bottle (storing acid was a common use for them in the lab). He didn't look at the lable and took a nice swig. Now HCl won't burn you like some, it's stomach acid, but that concentrated will cause a fair amount of dsicomfort.

      I get the impression your teacher was just spinning a fanciful yarn. The pH of your stomach is usually not less than 1, and your stomach has enzymes that protect it from being melted away by the acid that is in there. 6M is something like 60 times the concentration of acid in your stomach - you think throwing up burned the back of your throat? This will be excrutiating! A swig of fairly concentrated HCl would probably taste disgustingly sour. A person would realize immediately that something seriously wrong had occurred (and more appropriately would probably have spat it out before swallowing).

      Hopefully she administered copious amounts of water with a little baking soda in it by mouth until his stomach hurt from being so full.

      --
      Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
      Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
    2. Re:Chem classess are still fun by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

      I could have the concentration, but she's not the kind of person to lie about things like this. That, and I was friends with the guy (he is about 3 years younger than me). I might have the acid concentration wrong, but I'm almost 100% sure the story is true.

    3. Re:Chem classess are still fun by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      She also told us that her son managed to make himself nice and sick to his stomach by drinking some fairly concentrated (like 6 molar) hydrochloric acid.

      That has to be one of the most irresponsible cases of bad parenting I've ever seen. A jury could probably get a conviction on it being intentional if they wanted to. She knew her son drank out of those bottles, yet she leaves dangerous chemicals lying around in them?

      I bet she tried to sue the bottle manufacturers on the grounds that the label wasn't big enough! Ahh, parents. It's never their fault...

  92. OT: Hayes register S13 by i_am_nitrogen · · Score: 1

    http://members.tripod.com/~oldboard/assembly/hayes _modem_info.html


    |7|6|5|4|3|2|1|0| S13 power up async data format
    | | | | | | | `---- unused
    | | | | | | `----- result code, 0=basic, 1=extended
    | | | | | `------ parity, 0=disabled, 1=enabled
    | | | | `------- parity, 0=odd ,1=even
    | | | `-------- data bits, 0=7 bits, 1=8 bits
    | | `--------- undefined
    | `---------- buffer ovfw flag, 0=disabled,1=enabled
    `----------- 8th bit, 0=space,1=mark (8 bit only)


    Mileage may vary with non Hayes 1200 baud modems.

  93. Effect on lake pH by panurge · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Rainwater is slightly acid, from nitrogen oxides, and pond water often contains acidic organics as well as bicarbonate ion. The net effect of all that sodium hydroxide is likely to be very small indeed. In fact, if you are producing what the local water company calls "trade effluent", they like the pH to be slightly alkaline and don't care whether it is sodium or calcium ion.

    Having said that, the shock waves and removal of oxygen can kill or traumatise a lot of fish and any birds near the surface. Which makes this a somewhat redneck experiment: I have no problem with people letting off big bangs, but not when they carelessly kill things in the neighborhood.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  94. Iraqi stockpiles? by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny


    Has anybody accused Iraq of mass-producing Sodium yet?

    After all, don't they call that mad leader "Sodium Hussein" or something like it?

  95. So.... by trotski · · Score: 0, Redundant
    1. Purchase lakeside property.
    2. Aquire a sizable amount of sodium metal.
    3. Build a suitable platform for lowering sodium into lake.
    4. Lower sodium into the lake.
    5. ???
    6. Profit.
    --

    "Entropy is the bad-guy, and he is everywhere"
    1. Re:So.... by AceCaseOR · · Score: 0

      5. Film it and put it on pay-per-view.

      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
  96. Sodium accident at school by joerg · · Score: 1, Informative

    I know a guy, who once when he was a boy, stole some sodium at school. At recess he threw it into a puddle of water. Eventually a teacher approached, and the boy covered the puddle with a piece of paer to hide the stolen sodium. Under the paper the rection went on and the concentration of hydrogen gas increased until the level of detonating gas was reched. The burning sodium made it explode, and the poor boy got his face burned by squirting Caustic soda solution. he got seriously injured and almost left one eye.

  97. metal by IAR80 · · Score: 1

    Sodium is not a metal.

    --
    http://ebgp.net/ccc/
    1. Re:metal by BrainInAJar · · Score: 1

      Yes it is.

      It loses electrons, and bonds ionically with non-metals, therefore it's a metal by definition.

    2. Re:metal by mudshark · · Score: 1

      Wrongo. Not only is sodium a metal, but it is one of the most metallic of all the elements. Iron, on the other hand, is barely a metal in the chemical sense. And aluminum? We won't even go there.

      Go study basic chemistry, and come back to us when you get a clue.

      --
      In other news, astrophysicists have announced that they now know what all that dark matter is: it's stupidity.
  98. Read the article by Quila · · Score: 2

    His lake is an acre and a half -- over 6,000 square meters, if two meters deep on average, that's over 12,000 cubic meters of water
    = 12,000,000 liters
    = 12,000,000 kilograms

    The guy had 1.6 kilos of Na, giving us .13ppm if I did my math right.

  99. Re:MIRROR!!! with some 3 videos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make that 11 videos (3 more on the way), and all but 1 picture and 1 graphic.

  100. Why the pond blew up by jpsst34 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I can't get to the link. Their cervix ^H^H^H^H^H^H^H server must have been near the lake when it exploded. As such, I'll explain why the lake blew up. You see, Sodium is a noble gas, making it highly reactive. Get it near water, midgets, or antique furniture and Bang-Woo! Just like eatin' beans!

    --
    How are you going to keep them down on the farm once they've seen Karl Hungus?
  101. Theory for why the bucket burst by mrflip · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Quoth the author:
    This theory would imply that only a minimal shock wave should be transmitted into the water, since the explosion would be happening well above the surface, as the picture seems to show. Unfortunately that theory is not supported by the fact that the metal bucket was split at the seams, even though less than an inch of rim extended over the level of the water.

    Water is (nigh) incompressible -- so a small shock wave goes a long way. Since air has such a small bulk modulus (large compressibility) lots of energy can be stored in compressing the air and in adiabatically heating it. Since the water has a huge bulk modulus, there is no opportunity for the downward portion of the shock wave to dissipate -- that is, until it reaches the seams of the bucket and causes it to bust (dissipating energy as plastic deformation of the metal).

    This is also why lighting and flushing a cherry bomb is so enjoyable for non-janitors: the shock wave goes into plumes of water and wrecking the sewer system, not harmlessly into the air.

    flip

  102. Do it to control Acid Rain! by dido · · Score: 2

    Gee, that's an explosive way to counteract the effects of acid rain! You'd get sodium sulfate in the water, but I imagine it's not nearly as bad as sulfuric acid.

    --
    Qu'on me donne six lignes écrites de la main du plus honnête homme, j'y trouverai de quoi le faire pendre.
  103. Sodium+Lake+Beer Belly = Soap! by MickLinux · · Score: 1

    I noticed that comment about those who do this being drunk at the time, and couldn't help but remember this.

    Of course, if you want to prepare it in the more traditional manner, the way I have heard it is:

    burn wood --> ashes
    ashes+water---heat--->dilute NaOH (boil down to desired concentration, I have no idea what.)
    NaOH+lard --> good yellow soap.

    Needless to say, you want to be careful that the lard you use is not your own. I know some people say you can't be too clean in the lab, but I think that in this case we could agree that one would be overdoing the cleanliness.

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
  104. JATO story was in WIRED a few years ago by GMontag · · Score: 2

    The JATO story was in WIRED magazine about two years ago as an interview/narrative by the alleged creator of the vehicle. Check WIRED.com in the archives. Was in print and in web edition too. I really do not buy this version either, but to each their own.

    BTW, I did submit the story to /., as I am sure zillions of others did, but I never saw a refrence to the WIRED story here :(

  105. Science Teach did somting simmilar by VEGETA_GT · · Score: 1, Funny

    Back home whe I was in grade 4 (i can actualy rember that far back) we where rushed out of school to a fire alarm in the afternoon. What did we see but the science teacher walking back from a small pond behind the school looking loke he had taken a dip in.

    It turned out earler that day he was cleaning out the chemistary lab (this school went from 1 to 12, big place) and found a semi rustey can leaking oil in the back. Now most chemestry teachers would realize things like Sodium and other things are stored in oil to prevent them from exploding if they come in contact with water. Wel this teacher not having a chemestery background thought nothing of it. Later that day he took this can of oil back to the pond and tossed it in. He started to walk away when the can did a mini depth charge scean you see in a WW2 movie, compleatealy soking him and cassing people int he school to beleave it happened in the school and pull the alarm. I don't rember all the details like exactaly what chemical was but I rember he was not there for grade 5

    1. Re:Science Teach did somting simmilar by B747SP · · Score: 1
      I don't rember all the details like exactaly what chemical was but I rember he was not there for grade 5

      Given the quality (or lack thereof) of your writing, I'm inclined to think that you weren't there for Grade 5 either.

      --
      I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
  106. They should have used that by jo.cool · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    to kill the snakeheads in that Maryland pond.

  107. Sodium and High School by kenf · · Score: 3, Funny

    When I was in high school, many decades ago, a friend of mine aquired a large quantity of sodium in a rather ilicit way. He cut it up into several gram lumps, and sold them to our fellow students, who would then get the restroom pass, and throw the lump into the toilet, with predictable results.

    One fool bought several lumps, and managed to destroy a toilet!

    By the way, this was one of our nation's leading science high schools, again proving that smart does not insure common sense.

    1. Re:Sodium and High School by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      Actually there are stupid people everywhere, and the more educated they are, the more dangerous.

  108. Sodium in toilets. Great fun. by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

    Some guys in my high school class stole a substantial quantity of sodium from the school labs. They decanted this, oil and all, into several freezer bags. Leaving the bags unsealed, just wrapping the open end very tightly around the sodium, they then proceeded to flush all these down the toilet - and to run.

    These guys were hoping to spark off the methane in the cesspit. I think they got a bit more than they bargained for!

    What a mess. Put it this way: One, if you must do this, use someone else's toilet. Two, for heaven's sake make sure the other stalls are empty!!!

  109. My chemistry teacher was a loser by informagicien · · Score: 2, Funny

    I read some chemistry teacher stories in this thread, and most do not show the teacher from a bad angle.
    Mine decided to demonstrate that sodium reaction in a glass aquarium filled with water. After one guy recalled from the year before that there would be a reaction, we decided to get some distance from the teacher as he grabbed a piece that seemed just "too big" to not do anything stupid.
    He told us to approach to see better, and we got away and prepared to duck for cover.
    He then decided it was maybe unsafe and put a glass cover on top of the aquarium.
    And that's when the aquarium exploded shattering glass across the whole classroom and doing quite some damage to him.
    But then again, it's the same teacher who told us one morning he blew up his garage door with his car because he forgot to open it.
    He also told us one liquid was very dangerous for the eyes only after one smart kid threw it with a pipette in the face of a girl who ended up evacuated at the hospital.

    --
    -- x
  110. In High School... by Fished · · Score: 2

    I took about a gram of sodium from the chemistry lab, dropped it in the toilet, and turned it into a fountain.

    Ah... The good old days. Sometimes I'm amazed that I lived through High School.

    --
    "He who would learn astronomy, and other recondite arts, let him go elsewhere. " -- John Calvin, commenting on Genesis 1
  111. A great book to read... by jeaster · · Score: 1

    Reading this story and these posts remind me of a book I read a few months ago:
    Uncle Tungsten.
    Excellent autobiography of a chemist, and an in depth introduction to chemistry. I do not have more than a passing knowledge of chemistry, but this was just a fun, and interesting book. It basically deals with every piece of the periodic table, and the chemists and elements that built it and helped fill it in. Go to your library and take a look!

    1. Re:A great book to read... by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 2

      He had a Wired Article about him a few issues back. Very good read.

  112. Song: Three and a half pounds by AppyPappy · · Score: 3, Funny

    To the tune of "Sixteen tons":

    You buy three and half pounds
    And what do you get
    A little bit poorer
    And blown to shit

    --

    If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem

  113. Re:The OSS used sodium metal & potassium tabs by kiwimate · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The USAAF dropped cases to the French resistance, who used them to little or no effectiveness- not entirely unexpected French-like bevaior.

    Enough already!

    Everyone knows the French are cowards, yada yada yada. Did you read that bit in the newspaper a few days ago where the French rescued all the Westerners (including several Americans) from the Ivory Coast? (And, by the way, the article fails to point out that the French had been there for several days before the American forces turned up.) Would it surprise you to learn that the French, prior to WWII, had one of the proudest and most effective resistance records in the world? Drop it, for crying out loud.

    And no, I have no affinity to France. For what it's worth, I'm from one of the few countries which has felt the effects of official state-sponsored French terrorism in the past few decades. (The bombing of the ship "Rainbow Warrior" in Auckland, New Zealand, 7 July 1985, ordered by the French Secret Service to dissuade Greenpeace from protesting continued nuclear bomb testing at Mururoa Atoll.)

    But enough with the xenophobic hatred. Considering the real wars and battles currently being fought by more than half the nations in the world, don't you think that leaving off these snide and childish insults might be rather a good idea?

  114. A new sport by jpsst34 · · Score: 0

    Some people fish with a hook, line, and cut bait. Others use a net. Others still shock the water with electroded and wait for the stunned fish to float to the surface. And there's the minority who throw sodium into the water. I don't fish in any of these ways. I do a different kind of fishing - fishing for the common moronfish. It's known in some regions as /. readers more l33t than joo. But sometimes I catch a slightly different breed, the king moronfish, also known as the /. moderator. See, I post a comment where the first sentence is redundant, but the rest is new. The new part is completely inaccurate, acting as bait to catch the smart /. readers, so that they'll attack me for being dumb, or they'll be quick to point out my spelling errors, as that is, afterall, the ultamate way to judge one's intelligince. But by sheer luck, I catch a king moronfish who mods my commend down as redundant, because it was too lazy to read beyond the first punctuation mark.

    --
    How are you going to keep them down on the farm once they've seen Karl Hungus?
  115. Videos Mirrored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Videos are mirrored:
    videos

  116. Another High School story by docbrown42 · · Score: 1

    When I was in high school (back in the 80s), our chemistry teacher and biology teacher decided to clean out the back store room (which hadn't been cleaned in at least a decade at that point). They ended up finding a bunch of sticks of Lithium, and several unmarked jars.

    On jar in particular looked dangerous. Basicly, it was a small (~1/2 gallon) jar filled with an unknown liquid. Unfortunately, It had been sitting on top of another, larger jar (partly filled with something else). The lid of the larger jar had given way, dropping the smaller jar inside. The labels of both jars had long since fallen off, so no one had any idea what was in there.

    So, these 2 teachers get the bright idea of disposing of the Lithium and the large jar over a long weekend, and decide to video tape themselves doing so (we got to watch the tape later). They tried throwing the lithium in a large puddle out in the courty somewhere, but their aim was so bad, the lithium fell onto wet patches of ground and just sizzled.

    The funniest bit of the tape was when they decided to do something about the jar. Neither one of them owned a gun, but they wanted to shoot the jar and see what happened (I think they were hoping for an explosion). So, the biology teacher got his bow and started shooting arrows at the jar, hoping to puncture it, but couldn;t hit the damned thing.

    By this point, most of the kids watching the tape were laughing because of the inneptness of the teachers. Eventually, the teacher did hit tha jar....and nothing happend. To this day, no one knows what was in that jar, but it wasn't explosive.

    --
    Ed Wedig
    Graphic design services
    docbrown.net
  117. Heh by cjsnell · · Score: 3, Funny


    11. explain to dad why the driveway has heat blisters

    That reminds me of the time a friend and I made napalm and lit a large glob of it on dad's driveway. It burned for like three hours and we ended up having to put it out with the hose before he got home. I have no idea how long it would have kept burning.

    Here's the funny thing: we did this back in 1989 or so (9th grade) and there's still a large, black, un-removable circle of charred napalm permanently affixed to dad's driveway. I think he's still pissed at us.

    1. Re:Heh by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 2

      That's got to be a real fun one if you were, say, sitting on the seat and "something" made a backsplash that gave enough water to get the reaction going. That would be a fun trip to the ER.

      Anyone besides me remember the MacGuyver episode where he used Sodium & water to explode himself out of a locked room. I forget what his trigger was.

  118. Sodium in your pocket by Ratbert42 · · Score: 2

    When I was in high school, the (possibly urban legend) story told by our chemistry teacher was that a former student had stolen a small chunk of sodium from chem lab. He stuck it in his pocket, probably figuring he'd blow the toilet right out of his double-wide after school. Anyways, he goes to P.E. later in the day. Next period, he's sitting in history class or shop or whatever and he starts sweating in his jeans. Next thing he knows, he's on fire.

  119. Cool teachers by tomzyk · · Score: 1

    Wow. A lot of cool stories on here from highschool chem classes. :)

    Although, one of my my highschool chemistry teachers never did anything crazy with cesium, but he played around with liquid methane for a week. (Submerging methane in a testtube into a liquid nitrogen bath, he'd get some liquid methane.) He would douse his hand with it (the methane, not the nitrogen) and light it on fire... He'd dump it on the floor of the classroom and ignite it so we could watch little balls of fire rolling around under everyone's desk. Cool guy. :) He definitely made chemistry fun. (although, ended up panicing a few students in the process... hehehehe)

    --
    Karma: NaN
  120. Re:Programming in Hex by Abreu · · Score: 2

    Mel??? is that you?

    --
    No sig for the moment.
  121. Reminds me of High School Chemistry Class by SScorpio · · Score: 1

    My high school chemistry professor had a video of this other professor doing the exact same thing.

    The professor in the video had a friend how was in chemical industry who gave him a free barrel/crate/how ever it's shipped or Sodium.

    The professor would goto this lake every year and throw several large cylindar shapped pieces into the lake. Sadly the tape was the professor's last year of doing this because he went though his whole stock of sodium. He tried getting more but it was too expensive and the company accidently sent him a stick of potasium. That thing made a nice explosion.

    1. Re:Reminds me of High School Chemistry Class by Frobnicator · · Score: 1
      You only had a MOVIE of it?

      Our teacher was into fun, and showed us a chunk of sodium cut off of a block, a chunk of potasium cut from a block, and the joys of white phosphorus. [For those who don't know, white phosphorus is stored in some liquid, I think karosene, and after it drys off and is exposed to air, bursts into flame.] He said that one year a not-so-brite student liked his demonstration and stole a bit of white phosphorus. The student stuffed it in his pants pocket. Before the class was over, he had a seriously burned leg and had to go to the hospital.

      Our physics teacher, Mr. Jackson, demonstrated all physics principles with explosions. He had two canisters at the front of the room -- O2 and H2. He would fill up balloons with about the right mix of the two gasses, and have darts thrown at them. The darts had cotton swabs attached, doused in alcohol and lit on fire. We would have 'games of skill' where a few people in the class would put up a buck, and he would put up 1, 5, or 10 (based on his attitude) and the people whose experiments resulted in the closest values to the physics models would collect the pot. That's the joys of having an independatnly rich HS teacher. (Mr. Jackson invented the glass Bottle Strecher, and teaches at Viewmont High)

      Well, I gotta get back to work.

      frob.

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
  122. We were mad in high school. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in Highschool I had a chemistry teacher, who was pretty much obsessed with making sodium explode. And our class always thought it was fun (we, the pupils were mad too, it was a class with guys only).

    I remember one day we had an extra class scheduled (inofficially of course), just for the purpose of making sodium explode. The teacher (who shall remain unnamed, thank you very much) had set up a little glass jar with water on his desk. He started out with really small pieces. They sparked, hissed and even flamed up a little. It was nice. Almost cosey. Then he proceeded to take a piece that was a little bigger.

    *KABOOM*

    The whole bazaar exploded. The moment afterwards, everyone just sat there absolutely still. A little shocked. The teacher, standing right at the glass jar that now had splittered all across the room, stood there absolutely still, in the same position he had when he dropped the piece into the jar. It was as if nobody actuelly couldn't belive that just had happend. Luckily, nobody got hurt from the glass pieces that were moving in a high velocity. We decided that was enough for the day. Oh goodness how we laughed about that. It was a fun story to tell to people from other classes.

    You'd think it would be over now, would you? WRONG! Like I said, we were all mad, so a few weeks before graduation, we convinced him into scheduling an extra lecture outdoors, by the river near the school. The purpose of this was of course to blow up some more sodium, this time in the river.

    We threw some pretty large chunks in there (by hand of course, despite the earlier incident, we were no wussies...). And boy was it fun. It was almost in the middle of town, so people must have been terrified (wonder the bloody police didn't show up).

    Reading all this I'm starting to wonder if we actually are really lucky that we're still alive...

  123. Crappy cut and paste of article by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1

    (DISCLAIMER: I saw no copyright notice on the article, and I think the guy just wants people to know about his hobby and be in awe of him (which this page accomplished for me), so think this cut n' paste will only help his cause. If you can't reach his site, read below; but BE SURE to go back to his site at a lower traffic time to check out the presumably sweet videos (which I have yet to check out:-)). And now, so more geeks can understand just how cool this chemistry is:)
    ____________________________
    Sodium Party
    Periodic Table home

    I'd read about, and heard stories about, throwing sodium into water. It's a classic thing chemistry students do in college, and based on the reports I have been able to find on the internet, they are often drunk at the time.

    While anecdotal evidence would suggest that many people have thrown sodium into the lakes and streams of the world, they have been reprehensibly lax in documenting the results. I could find no reliable, and I stress the word reliable, reports on what actually happens. What reports I did find were contradictory: As you will see, I now know why. The only videos I could find were of pathetic thumbnail-sized bits skidding about in a bowl. (Click here to see my version of this: It's really boring, trust me.)

    (A note on videos: All the videos on this page are in QuickTime format, and most of them require QuickTime V5 or better. You can download the latest version of QuickTime for Macintosh or Windows from http://www.apple.com/quicktime/download.)

    To do better than that, I decided I should produce a comprehensive online reference on sodium dropping, with documentation on the size and shape of the chunks, how thrown, and most importantly with videos of the resulting explosions. To do this, I held a Sodium Party. People brought chips and soda and we had a cookout.

    The first step was the procurement, through eBay, of three and half pounds of solid sodium metal for about a hundred dollars. This is a decent price for a small quantity like this. Small being a relative term: It's used by the ton in industry, but anything more than a few grams is a dangerous quantity if found in your home. Three and a half pounds is enough, for example, to blow your home to bits under the right conditions.

    Next I constructed a patented Sodium Release-o-tron:

    It was designed to be constructed in less than an hour using only things I already had lying around the shop, be very unlikely to go off by accident, and be unable to fail when activated. So far so good.

    Here's a picture of the first lump I loaded into it, in a preliminary experiment about a month before the party:

    Click here for a video showing how this lump was cut off of the main block: A wood chisel and some pushing is all it takes, because this stuff is very, very soft.

    And here's a picture of what happened when we pulled the string:

    Click here to see a video of this first explosion. (But only if you've got a fast connection, because it's not the best video by far: See below for much better ones if loading these takes time for you.)

    This chunk, about 50 grams, gave a surprisingly strong bang, especially considering that there was no containment and no intentional pre-mixing of reactive chemicals, at least one of which is normally a prerequisite for a sharp report.

    My theory is that it's a fuel-air explosion caused by mixing of the hydrogen gas with air, ignited a second or two later (as you can see in the video) by the heat that builds up in the sodium. The heating of the sodium acts as the time fuse needed to make any fuel air bomb work. This theory would imply that only a minimal shock wave should be transmitted into the water, since the explosion would be happening well above the surface, as the picture seems to show. Unfortunately that theory is not supported by the fact that the metal bucket was split at the seams, even though less than an inch of rim extended over the level of the water.

    Which brings me to a safety warning: Sodium is really rather dangerous. If we had been anywhere within 15 feet of this explosion, it would have sprayed us with molten sodium and sodium hydroxide. Even a tiny amount in the eyes would have been a serious medical emergency. That's why I built a device that let me release it in a very controlled way from a great distance: If you want to do anything even remotely like this, you should take similar precautions. While it's safe to drop a tiny piece, maybe a few millimeters on edge, into a bowl of water, if you are wearing safety glasses, the force of the explosion goes up non-linearly with size. A lot of people have hurt themselves by going to bigger and bigger pieces thinking it's just going to do more of the same. It doesn't: At some point it turns from a fizzle and flame into a real explosion, like a shotgun.

    There's also the issue of smoke, of which a lot is produced. I'm not sure what the smoke is, but I suspect it's powdered soda lye (caustic soda, otherwise known as sodium hydroxide), which means you really, really don't want to get in the way of it. Or it could be powdered sodium oxide, which might react over time with carbon dioxide in the air to form sodium carbonate or bicarbonate. I really don't know. But if it is powdered soda lye it would severely burn your eyes, lungs, and skin, and no safety glasses would protect you. Be sure you are upwind.

    We had wet down about a 15 foot radius all around, and true to expectations, there were a series of secondary explosions as balls of sodium ejected by the main explosion hit the ground. Unfortunately I was taken aback by the explosion and jerked the camera, so you can't see them. That's one reason the later videos came out better: I used a tripod.

    I had planned to hose down and maybe neutralize the driveway the next morning, but in a fascinating display of nature, the driveway was full of little yellow butterflies the next morning.

    I've read that male butterflies collect sodium as a present for their mates, and they sure seemed to like mine, so I decided to leave it. I'm surprised they liked what must be a fairly basic solution, but then maybe it's just neutralized decades of road acid.

    According to the popular radio entomologist May Berenbaum from the University of Illinois, I was right about the butterflies. She writes:
    "They're called sulfur butterflies (in the family Pieridae) and the general consensus is that they are indeed after sodium, which is transferred to females in the spermatophore or sperm package.
    Here are some references about the phenomenon:
    Adler, P. and D. Pearson, 1982. Why do male butterflies visit mud puddles? Can. J. Zool. 60: 322-325.
    Arms, K., P. Feeny and R.C. Lederhouse, 1974. Sodium: stimulus for puddling behavior by tiger swallowtail butterflies, Papilio glaucus. Science 185: 372-374.
    Smedley, S. R. and T. Eisner 1996. Sodium--a male moth's gift to its offspring. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 93:809-13.

    There's something intensely sad about this. These tiny creatures have nothing to give but a little package of sodium, but this they give with all their heart. It is their life, their hope, their future, and they give it, asking nothing in return, that their children might have a better start in life. I suppose it should be uplifting, but somehow it just seems terribly sad to me.

    Moving on, I still needed to work out the details of my Sodium Party. The classic thing to do with sodium is to throw it in a lake. I own a lake. It's obvious what to do, right? Actually, it's not that simple. For one thing, I care a great deal about the fish and frogs in my lake, and don't wish to poison or shock them. Sodium certainly isn't poisonous, but it could raise the pH measurably, even in my acre and a half lake (I did the math). More of a problem would be intense shock waves. After all, fishing with dynamite is a redneck tradition, and I don't allow fishing in my lake, even by me.

    There was also that phone call from the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, which somehow got wind of my idea. They believe that sodium is a caustic waste material which may not be dumped into the waters of the state in any quantity. I question that on two grounds, first I question that there is no lower reporting limit on sodium, and second I question that my lake is a water of the state. Having worked as a volunteer for an environmental water quality watchdog organization, and having spoken with several people there about this, I think I'm almost certainly right in believing that I have the legal right to dump a few ounces of sodium into my private lake if I so choose. The representative of the IEPA, however, disagreed with me on that conclusion.

    Fortunately, no constitutional crisis developed out of this impasse, because by the time he put is foot down, I had already decided that I really didn't want to place my fish in harms way anyway.

    The day before the party a few intrepid souls came out to test my ingenious workaround. I cleared a small floating deck, put a tarp over it with edges so I could flood the whole thing with about an inch of water, and put a small kids swimming pool full of water in the middle. Then I anchored the whole thing out in the middle of the lake with the sodium release-o-tron on it.

    I loaded the machine with a 109.5 gram solid lump of sodium (about twice as big as the piece in my first experiment on land), rowed away, and started the cameras rolling.

    The idea was that the sodium would explode in the pool, and at most a trivial amount would escape to the surrounding lake, where it would be instantly vaporized. I could then neutralize the pool water with a touch of hydrochloric acid ("Muriatic acid" at any hardware store), leaving only slightly salty water in the pool. (Sodium goes to hydrogen gas plus sodium and hydroxide ions in the water. Hydrochloric acid is chlorine and hydrogen ions: The hydrogen ions combine with the hydroxide ions to form water and neutralize the pH, while the sodium and chlorine ions are what is more commonly known as dissolved table salt. Not even the IEPA, I believe, has a regulation against dumping slightly salty water.)

    But that's not quite how it worked out. There was an initial large explosion:

    Then there were a series of secondary explosions obviously caused by a single fairly large chunk that was literally hopping across the lake. It was thrown high up into the air, came down to hit the water at a high rate of speed, and was then thrown back up into the air by the resulting explosion. This happened at least three, maybe four times, so far as I can tell from the video.

    This is quite alarming: The longest time between impacts, timed on the videotape, was 3.12 seconds. If you do the math, this means the chunk was thrown almost 40 feet high. Fortunately it was going reasonably close to straight up and down, and we were quite far away (about 200 feet). But this skipping behavior, which so far as I know is documented here for the first time on the internet, clearly gives the whole thing far greater potential reach. It's easy to imagine a chunk skipping hundreds of feet.

    I think this skipping behavior is one reason reports on what happens to sodium when you throw it in water are so varied and contradictory. As you will see in the videos below, it varies tremendously depending on the size of the chunk, how hard it hits the water, how deep the water is, and probably on the temperature of the air and water.

    Very small pieces skid around and may or may not burn, but don't generally explode. Larger pieces explode and disintegrate themselves. Still larger pieces explode but stay intact, ejecting a solid chunk high into the air. Of course when the chunk comes back down, it's anyone's guess what happens next.

    If someone were to throw a chunk like this (about three ounces) by hand into a lake, it could very easy come back and hit them. This video tape clearly demonstrates that sodium can throw itself farther than you can. And more ominously, you can clearly see on at least one of the jumps that it tends to come back at the direction it was thrown from. My theory is that when it hits the water it forms a cavity as it plunges down. This cavity acts like a cannon barrel to direct the chunk back in the direction it came from, when the steam and evolved hydrogen explode.

    For this reason, I think a repeat of this method of deployment would be ill advised. It simply isn't predictable enough to be safe. When the pool is surrounded by wet driveway, there's no obvious way for chunks to skip long distances, and that's the way I decided to do it for the main party.

    On the day of the party I set up the Release-O-Tron at one end of our parking lot, and laid out a pair of hoses connected to the well pump in the lake (which provides an endless supply of water). I ran the hoses for about an hour to get the whole gravel area wet down, and they were left running most of the time, to keep a good puddle about 40-50ft in diameter around the swimming pool.

    Starting around 5:30 we set off a bunch of explosions, using a variety of different sizes and configurations of sodium, during daylight and night time. Some were solid chunks, others were cut up into sugar-cube sized bits:

    Here are all the videos together in one place, in chronological order. Click on the picture to see the corresponding movie.

    Sample Image Movie Size Description
    452KB About one gram chip in a bowl. Boring. This is the experiment that makes a lot of people try bigger pieces, thinking that they will get more of the same. Instead they get an explosion they weren't expecting. Unless, of course, they've visited this web page.
    4.6MB How to cut up sodium with a chisel. Wear gloves and safety glasses.
    2.5MB Our first explosion, about 50 grams in one piece. I jerked the camera. Very Blair Witch.
    4.7MB Our second explosion, in a tub floated on the lake. 109.5 gram single piece.
    3.7MB First explosion of the party, done during daylight because some people had to leave early. A small 18.5 gram solid piece.
    3.9MB In this explosion we cut up 59.0 grams into sugar-cube-sized chunks to see if it made a difference. I think this configuration gives the most pleasing explosions.
    10.4MB 151.5 grams cut into cubes. This is one of the best videos.
    1.2MB 70.8 grams in one piece. This video is included for documentary completeness only: It's out of focus and not really worth watching.
    1.8MB 83.5 grams in one piece. This video is included for documentary completeness only: It's out of focus and not really worth watching.
    7.5MB 145.0 grams cut into cubes. This is probably the best video of the lot.
    2.2MB 119.5 grams in one piece. This video is somewhat out of focus, but it's a huge explosion to somewhat worthwhile to watch.
    21.4MB In this video we used a propane torch to light about 10 grams of it in a bowl, to see how it would burn. It burns sort of like magnesium, but easier to light. Sodium burning in air is very gentle, slow, controlled. Try to put it out with water and you're in big trouble.
    13.8MB More burning in air, about 50 grams this time. We used a stick to stir it, and the stick started burning like a fuse, probably because of moisture in it.
    2.3MB 87.5 grams in one piece.
    1.0MB Our biggest chunk ever: 175.0 grams in one piece, dropped in a bucket in the pool. It shot up like a rocket and landed on the driveway largely intact.
    12.7MB This video shows us tracking down and detonating the stray chunk from the last explosion. Ed and I sprayed it from a distance with water hoses. The video starts slow, but gets more interesting as it goes on.

    ______________________

    (Sorry if this pissed you off...if the author asks /. to remove this post, I completely agree with his request.)

  124. That's my kind of woman. by BoomerSooner · · Score: 2, Funny

    Being from Oklahoma I wish she were my age!

    Guns, Women, Lake, Explosion, Priceless...

    .22 Cal Rifle
    Scientific knowledge
    Female
    Explosive experiment
    Delicious!

    Damn, where have all the good ladies gone. My wife is afraid of my 9mm (glad I didn't get a .45 instead).

  125. Here's what happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Posting as AC for obvious reason.
    I have been to many parties where we throw sodium in the lake. It's pretty. We generally use a surgical-tubing sling, a large one held by two people and run by a 3rd. Always wear gloves.
    We chop the stuff up into blocks from sugar cube to maybe 1.5" squares, depending on our mood. Launch 50 to 100 feet out into the water. You get something between a POP and a BLAM! and a white explosion of sparks flying up. NOT a "BOOOM!" I do NOT believe it would kill a fish; it's not that heavy of an explosion. If you threw out a much larger piece at once maybe, but the thing is that the water can't really get to it all at once to make a huge explosion. What happens when you throw in big pieces is that you get a bang as the piece breaks up, then lots of little secondary pops.

    The stuff we were using was somewhat oxidized, or something, on the surface (in storage a long time). The reaction was better after cutting so a fresh surface was exposed.

    Oh, BTW, neither liquid oxygen nor hydrogen are nearly as dangerous as the general population thinks they are, either. All of these things must be treated with respect, but once you figure out the parameters they're all fun.

  126. Re:The OSS used sodium metal & potassium tabs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even Mussolini didn't sell out the Jews. The French did, willingly. In the Algerian war of 1954, they killed hundreds of thousands of rebels and displaced millions of civilians. The French, currently selling nuclear tech to Iraq and aiding and abetting other known terrorist states, are threatening to veto any UN resolutions unless we ensure that they will get lucrative oil contracts with the new regime. They are a craven and pathetic people, beneath contempt.

  127. Re:The OSS used sodium metal & potassium tabs by tdye · · Score: 2

    Not to mention that the French special forces are some unbelievably bad-ass motherfuckers.

  128. Re:Whyyy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    This is the metal rusitng before your eyes ... This sciene teacher ... a shugar cube ... looks likeit boiling ... It make a huge "BOOM" ... funny thing baout sodium ... karasin will not react ...

    I saw a science teacher at the middle school do this when i went there.


    I'm guessing that you shouldn't have dropped out then. Please go back, it's not too late.

  129. I cannot believe this! by jopet · · Score: 3, Informative

    You said these were the chemistry & biology teachers and not, say, the janitor? It should not have been hard for the chemistry teacher to find out in a few minutes what is in the jar. Most things you can imagine in a school lab can be analysed by a few simple reactions. But to simply throw away this stuff like that - it could have been a hazard to the environment or the health - is entirely pathetic and would have been illegal at least in my country.

    1. Re:I cannot believe this! by docbrown42 · · Score: 1

      Agreed, but that's what happened. And, yes, throwing stuff like that away is probably illegal now, but may not have been back then.

      --
      Ed Wedig
      Graphic design services
      docbrown.net
  130. Yes, but why? by Interrobang · · Score: 2
    I mean, it's amusing as hell in a sick sort of way, but why would someone really want to blow up their own private pond?

    The only reasons I can think of are:

    because he's bored and can't think of something, anything better to do (watching paint dry springs immediately to mind)

    because he stocked the pond and doesn't have the patience to fish for real (throw the sodium into the water, wait, then cruise out in your dory with a net and scoop the fish off the remaining water), or

    because he can, which doesn't really answer the "why" question.

    What is it with most geeks and things that go kaboom anyway? Do you guys all want to be Marvin the Martian or something?

    1. Re:Yes, but why? by Baikala · · Score: 1

      SO.. you're not a geek
      What are you doing here in the first place?

      --
      16,777,216 comments ought to be enough for any forum!
    2. Re:Yes, but why? by Interrobang · · Score: 2

      No, I am a geek. I just don't like to blow things up. The last time I tried that, I singed my hair (long, then). Now that I'm older and wiser, I stay away from dangerous things, mostly out of a vested interest in keeping my hide intact. Wondering why you all wouldn't do the same. Immortality complexes?

    3. Re:Yes, but why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Immortality complexes?"

      Or maybe you just have a mortality complex and we're all completely normal. :?

  131. H2 + O2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Waaay more fun!!

    50 Gallon Garbage bags, 3 100 yard extention cords, paper clips, H2 and O2 (make your own from water or use the torch tanks)

  132. Re:Programming in Hex by frog51 · · Score: 2

    No, Mel is very very clever. I just had a lot of time on my hands.

  133. better than the by winse · · Score: 1

    One pound of sodium that my dad and I threw into
    a 5 gallon bucket of water in the back yard.
    I wish that I had video of that to show you all.
    the bucket blew into hundreds of pieces and the grass was flattened....
    then we heard a thud in the garden nearby.
    What was left of the bar was sitting there burning
    and melting in the wet garden. It was quite an experience.

    --
    this sig is deprecated
  134. Re:The OSS used sodium metal & potassium tabs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, while we are waaaay of topic, you might want to note that they sent mostly foreign legion troops. Which, apart from the officers, don't accept any French citizens.
    But, having been in the German army, I cross trained with French troops and the longer serving soldiers and NCOs in their elite forces were really good. Pity they treated their conscripts so badly.

  135. In a previous life... by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 5, Informative

    Before moving on to my current career, I worked for about 6 months at a secondary lead refinery, where we recycled car batteries back into lead.

    The batteries were brought into what was called the breaker room, where they were smashed, the plastic case pieces would float to the top of the mix and removed for recycling, the liquid was drained off and sold, and then what was left was run through a drying kiln and then into a reverbatory furnace with molten lead coming out the other end.

    The lead was then treated with a variety of processes to either soften or harden it. This was the part that was a pyromaniac's wet dream. Imagine a refinery floor with 4 kettles of 250-300,000 pounds of molten lead each, set into the floor so that the top of the kettle is just above waist high. Then imagine that the processing of these kettles full of molten lead uses powdered sulfur, red phosphorous, a calcium-aluminum-magnesium alloy and SODIUM. That's right, they paid union steel workers to stand there and throw paper lunch sacks full of powdered red phosphorous into a swirling kettle of molten lead. Oh yeah...

    I was a Q.C. technician, so it was my job to sample the lead, test it's content and then write orders for the union guys to follow as to how much of each material to add.

    Now, back to the sodium story... remember the breaker room where they smashed the batteries? That room was as big as a medium-sized airplane hanger, all metal construction with a cement floor. The floor was usually covered by up to an inch of a weak sulfuric acid solution that leaked from the battery crushing equipment. Less than a hundred yards away was a storage room containing 25 gallon drums of large chunks of metallic sodium. One day one of the guys called me over, pulled out a large knife and sliced off a chunk of sodium about the size of a baseball, and I then followed him to the entrance of the battery crusher room. He wiggled his eyebrows, which was about all the expression you can display behind a respirator, safety glasses and a face shield, and then threw that chunk of sodium into the middle of the room.

    KABLOOIE!

    Sodium reacts when it contacts water, because it disassociates a Hydrogen and an Oxygen atom from the water molecule leaving one free Hydrogen atom which then ignites from the heat generated by the reaction. Now, imagine if instead of water (H2O) you instead used a mixture of H2O and H2S04. More hydrogen! More oxygen! Bigger boom! Heck, you can throw just about any metal into Sulfuric Acid and start liberating small amounts of Hydrogen, so something like Sodium is just overkill.

    Luckily we were wearing those big ear-muff style hearing protectors, or we would have been deafened. The explosion was unbelievable and nearly knocked us over from 20+ feet away, and we weren't even in the same room where it happened.

    The most amazing part of the story is that no one even noticed. There were so many loud noises and other distractions that a deafeningly loud bang was no reason for people to even look up.

    If it hadn't been for the fact that the company was an environmental disgrace (the president and several managers were indicted a year or so after I left for dumping water with lead dust in it into the local sewer system) and a safety nightmare (I've never seen a place with so many 'first aid incidents' before, and I hope to never again), it was a great job for $21,000 a year... of course that was 1998, so $21,000 seemed like a lot of money at the time...

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    1. Re:In a previous life... by nxs212 · · Score: 1

      Doesn't lead from car batteries contain arsenic and mercury? While inorganic arsenic is bad enough, mercury is far more toxic, especially in its vapor form.

    2. Re:In a previous life... by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 2

      Car battery lead contains arsenic and mercury, but it's in such small quantities (parts per billion) that it's practically negligable. Car batteries contain two kinds of lead, a hard lead and a soft lead. The battery posts/terminals are hard lead, an almost pure form of lead with minimal trace elements. The grid inside the battery, where most of the lead is, is soft lead, which is alloyed with Calcium and Aluminum and minor amounts of Magnesium to make it flexible and more reactive. Right before I left that job, someone stole a bottle of mercury from the QC lab (not on my shift) and dumped it into someone's boots. Luckily that person knocked their boot over before putting them on, or he would have been in for a very nasty surprise...

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
  136. Sodium, schmodium by Gefiltefish11 · · Score: 1

    You want to see a major reaction from placing an object into a body of water? Forget sodium or more unstable elements. Here's what you do:
    1. 1. Purchase 1 package Twix (known for better floatage)

    2. 2. Locate a crowded public pool
      3. Covertly drop one Twix bar into the pool
      4. Observe the CATASTROPHIC reaction!


    ...one of the greatest movies of all time
  137. Pictures Anyone??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    SODIUM DROP -- Huge chunks of solid sodium thrown off the Longfellow Bridge explode in the Charles River.

    http://www-tech.mit.edu/V117/N39/

  138. Another reference by Dominic+Shrimp · · Score: 1

    Oliver Sack's recent memoir "Uncle Tungsten", goes into great detail about his and his friends experients with various metals and gasses. Apparently dangerous chemicals were easy to come by for a boy in 1950's England.

  139. Re:Programming in Hex by Abreu · · Score: 2



    Sorry, the obfuscated perl in your sig made me think that maybe Mel had finally given in and exchanged Hex for perl's "expressiveness"

    </tounge>

    --
    No sig for the moment.
  140. Heh by Jo_6_Pac · · Score: 1

    My High school chemistry teacher once told us in class that his freinds and himself used to steal pieces of sodium from the labs at college for pratical jokes. They would take a piece of paper and some tape and make a small pocket on the underside of a toilet seat lid where they would insert piece of sodium. They would then close the lid. When some poor sap came along to "take care of business" he would get an unpleasant surprise upon lifting the lid. Boom! Once the sodium accidently fell into the toilet while my teacher was rigging the joke and the joke blew up in his face...literally

  141. Nair! (Re:Sodium Hydroxide) by Rick_T · · Score: 2

    > What else has a pH of 12? We're still in
    > the range of common household cleaners.

    Nair. So if you fancy jumping into a vat of Nair, ...

    (No, I'm not making this up. I have some of my students measure the pH of various shampoos and skin care products. Nair weighs in in the 10-12 range, usually.)

    --
    -- Rick
  142. Math by vlad_petric · · Score: 2

    1000 liters is just a cubic meter. I wouldn't call it a "pond"
    <p>
    The Raven

    --

    The Raven

  143. Re:The OSS used sodium metal & potassium tabs by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
    The French, currently selling nuclear tech to Iraq and aiding and abetting other known terrorist states, are threatening to veto any UN resolutions unless we ensure that they will get lucrative oil contracts with the new regime.

    I'm guessing you're from the USA. Ever taken a look at the history of your own country over the past 50 years...? Guilty on all charges.

    They are a craven and pathetic people, beneath contempt.

    That may apply to their government, but not the people. Same with the USA.

    I'm thinking you were joking, or completely obvious to history that isn't taught in your schools or made into movies.

  144. Re:And here I was led to believe he had the right. by sysadmn · · Score: 2

    Now we know why he never gets invited to Bill Gates' lake parties...

    --
    Envy my 5 digit Slashdot User ID!
  145. Re:If you wanted to know what toilets are made of. by dangermouse · · Score: 1

    I'll save you the trouble.

    It was porcelain.

  146. stolen Na ends up in toilet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was in highschool, we had a cool chemistry teacher who did that demonstration of the burning sodium in water. One of the kids thought that it was way too cool and stole a bar of it from the oil-filled jug whereinwhich it was kept, putting the bar of sodium in his back pocket. Very shortly thereafter, the sodium began to reach with moisture from the air and got very hot in his back pocket, so he pulled it out and, in a frenzy and a panic, ran into the bathroom and threw it into the toilet. Needless to say, the bathroom looked like something out of the gulf war (which was going on at the time) and the kid was lucky to not have dispersed himself throughout the school. At least he wasn't near the swimming pool at the time.

  147. right of passage is to order sodium in college by mcguyver · · Score: 1

    Friends in my dorms tried to order sodium from the chem lab on campus. A few minutes later the cops showed up to the class wondering who was trying to get ahold of sodium. That plan fell through but we did manage to get jars of 14 molar nitric acid - which works much better than liquid plummer.

  148. Dammit! Everyone is having fun with this! by Solokron · · Score: 1

    Where is the mirror?! I want to read!

    --
    30% off web hosting. Coupon code "SLASHDOT".
  149. Mirrors by Door-opening+Fascist · · Score: 2

    I've got mirrors up at Earlham College and UW-Madison. No movies, but pictures are in.

  150. Physics demonstration gone bad... by SethJohnson · · Score: 2


    At my highschool we had this great physics teacher named Mr. O'Leary. He did all kinds of active demonstrations. One went terribly bad, though.

    He was attempting to demonstrate how a large mass will absorb the energy of a hammer and protect the underlying structure (a hand in this case). So he sets this brick on his own hand on the stage in the auditorium (this was a big lecture which had ALL the different physics sections there) and asked the biggest brown-noser in his class (Mark Marking) who was sitting in the front to come up and smash the brick with this hammer. Mark resists by saying he doesn't want to, but O'Leary urged him to do it. Mark swung the hammer OVERHEAD and came right down on O'Leary's thumb, which was protruding from the side of the brick. His thumb was literally pulverized. He is so hardcore, though, that he went to the bathroom, got some paper towels, wrapped it up, and finished teaching the class before he went to the hospital. For a year he had to keep the thing elevated above his heart to give the tissue a chance to recover. Here's a picture of him nowadays (he's the older guy on the side.) That's the thumb as well. This all happened in the mid-80s, BTW, at a school in Tokyo, Japan.
    1. Re:Physics demonstration gone bad... by 1010011010 · · Score: 2


      He was my teacher! I wish I'd known about the thumb -- I would have asked about it. We would on occasion freeze his bag lunch in the vat of liquid nitrogen. Hehe. Fun class.

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
  151. Article Text, given ONCE only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sodium Party
    Periodic Table home

    I'd read about, and heard stories about, throwing sodium into water. It's a classic thing chemistry students do in college, and based on the reports I have been able to find on the internet, they are often drunk at the time.

    While anecdotal evidence would suggest that many people have thrown sodium into the lakes and streams of the world, they have been reprehensibly lax in documenting the results. I could find no reliable, and I stress the word reliable, reports on what actually happens. What reports I did find were contradictory: As you will see, I now know why. The only videos I could find were of pathetic thumbnail-sized bits skidding about in a bowl. (Click here to see my version of this: It's really boring, trust me.)

    (A note on videos: All the videos on this page are in QuickTime format, and most of them require QuickTime V5 or better. You can download the latest version of QuickTime for Macintosh or Windows from http://www.apple.com/quicktime/download.)

    To do better than that, I decided I should produce a comprehensive online reference on sodium dropping, with documentation on the size and shape of the chunks, how thrown, and most importantly with videos of the resulting explosions. To do this, I held a Sodium Party. People brought chips and soda and we had a cookout.

    The first step was the procurement, through eBay, of three and half pounds of solid sodium metal for about a hundred dollars. This is a decent price for a small quantity like this. Small being a relative term: It's used by the ton in industry, but anything more than a few grams is a dangerous quantity if found in your home. Three and a half pounds is enough, for example, to blow your home to bits under the right conditions.

    Next I constructed a patented Sodium Release-o-tron:

    It was designed to be constructed in less than an hour using only things I already had lying around the shop, be very unlikely to go off by accident, and be unable to fail when activated. So far so good.

    Here's a picture of the first lump I loaded into it, in a preliminary experiment about a month before the party:

    Click here for a video showing how this lump was cut off of the main block: A wood chisel and some pushing is all it takes, because this stuff is very, very soft.

    And here's a picture of what happened when we pulled the string:

    Click here to see a video of this first explosion. (But only if you've got a fast connection, because it's not the best video by far: See below for much better ones if loading these takes time for you.)

    This chunk, about 50 grams, gave a surprisingly strong bang, especially considering that there was no containment and no intentional pre-mixing of reactive chemicals, at least one of which is normally a prerequisite for a sharp report.

    My theory is that it's a fuel-air explosion caused by mixing of the hydrogen gas with air, ignited a second or two later (as you can see in the video) by the heat that builds up in the sodium. The heating of the sodium acts as the time fuse needed to make any fuel air bomb work. This theory would imply that only a minimal shock wave should be transmitted into the water, since the explosion would be happening well above the surface, as the picture seems to show. Unfortunately that theory is not supported by the fact that the metal bucket was split at the seams, even though less than an inch of rim extended over the level of the water.

    Which brings me to a safety warning: Sodium is really rather dangerous. If we had been anywhere within 15 feet of this explosion, it would have sprayed us with molten sodium and sodium hydroxide. Even a tiny amount in the eyes would have been a serious medical emergency. That's why I built a device that let me release it in a very controlled way from a great distance: If you want to do anything even remotely like this, you should take similar precautions. While it's safe to drop a tiny piece, maybe a few millimeters on edge, into a bowl of water, if you are wearing safety glasses, the force of the explosion goes up non-linearly with size. A lot of people have hurt themselves by going to bigger and bigger pieces thinking it's just going to do more of the same. It doesn't: At some point it turns from a fizzle and flame into a real explosion, like a shotgun.

    There's also the issue of smoke, of which a lot is produced. I'm not sure what the smoke is, but I suspect it's powdered soda lye (caustic soda, otherwise known as sodium hydroxide), which means you really, really don't want to get in the way of it. Or it could be powdered sodium oxide, which might react over time with carbon dioxide in the air to form sodium carbonate or bicarbonate. I really don't know. But if it is powdered soda lye it would severely burn your eyes, lungs, and skin, and no safety glasses would protect you. Be sure you are upwind.

    We had wet down about a 15 foot radius all around, and true to expectations, there were a series of secondary explosions as balls of sodium ejected by the main explosion hit the ground. Unfortunately I was taken aback by the explosion and jerked the camera, so you can't see them. That's one reason the later videos came out better: I used a tripod.

    I had planned to hose down and maybe neutralize the driveway the next morning, but in a fascinating display of nature, the driveway was full of little yellow butterflies the next morning.

    I've read that male butterflies collect sodium as a present for their mates, and they sure seemed to like mine, so I decided to leave it. I'm surprised they liked what must be a fairly basic solution, but then maybe it's just neutralized decades of road acid.

    According to the popular radio entomologist May Berenbaum from the University of Illinois, I was right about the butterflies. She writes:
    "They're called sulfur butterflies (in the family Pieridae) and the general consensus is that they are indeed after sodium, which is transferred to females in the spermatophore or sperm package.
    Here are some references about the phenomenon:
    Adler, P. and D. Pearson, 1982. Why do male butterflies visit mud puddles? Can. J. Zool. 60: 322-325.
    Arms, K., P. Feeny and R.C. Lederhouse, 1974. Sodium: stimulus for puddling behavior by tiger swallowtail butterflies, Papilio glaucus. Science 185: 372-374.
    Smedley, S. R. and T. Eisner 1996. Sodium--a male moth's gift to its offspring. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 93:809-13.

    There's something intensely sad about this. These tiny creatures have nothing to give but a little package of sodium, but this they give with all their heart. It is their life, their hope, their future, and they give it, asking nothing in return, that their children might have a better start in life. I suppose it should be uplifting, but somehow it just seems terribly sad to me.

    Moving on, I still needed to work out the details of my Sodium Party. The classic thing to do with sodium is to throw it in a lake. I own a lake. It's obvious what to do, right? Actually, it's not that simple. For one thing, I care a great deal about the fish and frogs in my lake, and don't wish to poison or shock them. Sodium certainly isn't poisonous, but it could raise the pH measurably, even in my acre and a half lake (I did the math). More of a problem would be intense shock waves. After all, fishing with dynamite is a redneck tradition, and I don't allow fishing in my lake, even by me.

    There was also that phone call from the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, which somehow got wind of my idea. They believe that sodium is a caustic waste material which may not be dumped into the waters of the state in any quantity. I question that on two grounds, first I question that there is no lower reporting limit on sodium, and second I question that my lake is a water of the state. Having worked as a volunteer for an environmental water quality watchdog organization, and having spoken with several people there about this, I think I'm almost certainly right in believing that I have the legal right to dump a few ounces of sodium into my private lake if I so choose. The representative of the IEPA, however, disagreed with me on that conclusion.

    Fortunately, no constitutional crisis developed out of this impasse, because by the time he put is foot down, I had already decided that I really didn't want to place my fish in harms way anyway.

    The day before the party a few intrepid souls came out to test my ingenious workaround. I cleared a small floating deck, put a tarp over it with edges so I could flood the whole thing with about an inch of water, and put a small kids swimming pool full of water in the middle. Then I anchored the whole thing out in the middle of the lake with the sodium release-o-tron on it.

    I loaded the machine with a 109.5 gram solid lump of sodium (about twice as big as the piece in my first experiment on land), rowed away, and started the cameras rolling.

    The idea was that the sodium would explode in the pool, and at most a trivial amount would escape to the surrounding lake, where it would be instantly vaporized. I could then neutralize the pool water with a touch of hydrochloric acid ("Muriatic acid" at any hardware store), leaving only slightly salty water in the pool. (Sodium goes to hydrogen gas plus sodium and hydroxide ions in the water. Hydrochloric acid is chlorine and hydrogen ions: The hydrogen ions combine with the hydroxide ions to form water and neutralize the pH, while the sodium and chlorine ions are what is more commonly known as dissolved table salt. Not even the IEPA, I believe, has a regulation against dumping slightly salty water.)

    But that's not quite how it worked out. There was an initial large explosion:

    Then there were a series of secondary explosions obviously caused by a single fairly large chunk that was literally hopping across the lake. It was thrown high up into the air, came down to hit the water at a high rate of speed, and was then thrown back up into the air by the resulting explosion. This happened at least three, maybe four times, so far as I can tell from the video.

    This is quite alarming: The longest time between impacts, timed on the videotape, was 3.12 seconds. If you do the math, this means the chunk was thrown almost 40 feet high. Fortunately it was going reasonably close to straight up and down, and we were quite far away (about 200 feet). But this skipping behavior, which so far as I know is documented here for the first time on the internet, clearly gives the whole thing far greater potential reach. It's easy to imagine a chunk skipping hundreds of feet.

    I think this skipping behavior is one reason reports on what happens to sodium when you throw it in water are so varied and contradictory. As you will see in the videos below, it varies tremendously depending on the size of the chunk, how hard it hits the water, how deep the water is, and probably on the temperature of the air and water.

    Very small pieces skid around and may or may not burn, but don't generally explode. Larger pieces explode and disintegrate themselves. Still larger pieces explode but stay intact, ejecting a solid chunk high into the air. Of course when the chunk comes back down, it's anyone's guess what happens next.

    If someone were to throw a chunk like this (about three ounces) by hand into a lake, it could very easy come back and hit them. This video tape clearly demonstrates that sodium can throw itself farther than you can. And more ominously, you can clearly see on at least one of the jumps that it tends to come back at the direction it was thrown from. My theory is that when it hits the water it forms a cavity as it plunges down. This cavity acts like a cannon barrel to direct the chunk back in the direction it came from, when the steam and evolved hydrogen explode.

    For this reason, I think a repeat of this method of deployment would be ill advised. It simply isn't predictable enough to be safe. When the pool is surrounded by wet driveway, there's no obvious way for chunks to skip long distances, and that's the way I decided to do it for the main party.

    On the day of the party I set up the Release-O-Tron at one end of our parking lot, and laid out a pair of hoses connected to the well pump in the lake (which provides an endless supply of water). I ran the hoses for about an hour to get the whole gravel area wet down, and they were left running most of the time, to keep a good puddle about 40-50ft in diameter around the swimming pool.

    Starting around 5:30 we set off a bunch of explosions, using a variety of different sizes and configurations of sodium, during daylight and night time. Some were solid chunks, others were cut up into sugar-cube sized bits:

  152. Re:The OSS used sodium metal & potassium tabs by Phaid · · Score: 2

    the French, prior to WWII, had one of the proudest and most effective resistance records in the world?

    That's not really saying great things about their military, though, is it?

  153. Urban legend? by taniwha · · Score: 2

    that story's getting close to an urban legend (doesn't mean it didn't happen) - I was told a varient in high schoiol in New Zealand 30 years ago

  154. Sodium Speedboats by gabe · · Score: 1

    I can vouch for the skittering effect.

    In high school my chem teacher placed a bowl of water on his desk at the front of the room. He then proceded to place a large plexiglass/plastic shield (about 3.5 or 4 feet high, three feet wide and curved) in front of the bowl to separate the fragile students from the harmless water.

    Well, then he takes out a small container with oil and a chunk of something (yes, sodium) in it. Opens it up, cuts off a chunk, tosses it in the bowl and joins the class on the proper side of the shield.

    What happened was that the chunk of sodium turned into a small, burning speedboat that sped around the surface of the water on the bowl. It shot of a whole lot of sparks and balls of fire. One of those balls of fire hit the sheild and started burning a hole in it. Another made the leap over the shield and onto a student's desk, who then just kinda stared at it in amazement and then backed his chair away.

    I think he left the classroom with a little less trust for our teacher that day. At least it didn't land in his lap, or on his head.

    But, my point is, I've often wondered if that kind of behavior could be duplicated on a grander scale with a large chunk of sodium and a nice calm lake.

    If only there were video footage of it...

    --
    Gabriel Ricard
  155. the Fire Department hates us... by omarKhayyam · · Score: 1

    On a related note, the Evanston Fire department isn't not a big fan of the Northwestern University's Engineering department. Reason? In the chem labs we have stored the largest concentration (of any university in the US) of substances that are flammable upon contact with water . Oh yea, and the building that the chem labs are in happens to be the third largest low rise office building in the world (behind the pentagon and the KGB headquarters). Seven miles of hallways :).

    1. Re:the Fire Department hates us... by esthanya · · Score: 1

      I can remember the first time I used Tech to get from Sargent to Annenburg...I got so lost I watched a freshmen chem class and their fun first day experiments...lots of boom

  156. your own private meteor shower by kyoorius · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Back in college, a ChemE friend of mine called me down to his dorm room to show me the sodium trick. His setup consisted of a ceramic bowl filled with water into which he dropped small pellet-sticks of sodium (removed from a separate oil filled jar).
    The reaction was someone impressive but not nearly as some of the other explosives ..err... "experiments" we had conducted before. So I offered my suggestion to pour some magnesium granules into the water and see what happens.. and so he did.

    To our surprise, what followed involved more physics than chemistry...

    He dropped in the sodium, which fizzed around for a few seconds, burst into bright flames.. igniting the magnesium granules .. which in turn vaporized the water .. ejecting 1000 DEGREE BALLS OF FIRE upward and in every direction. These meteors bounced off the walls, ceiling, and floor leaving holes + scorch marks in everything... the stereo, mattress, monitor, and his roomate's rare collectible $5 bill from 1891.
    Luckily my body was protected by the door and my face with a plastic report cover.. heh heh heh.

    Kids don't try this at home.

  157. Phosphorous maybe? by geethree · · Score: 1

    Red or white phosphorous is stored under water because they burn when they dry out and come into contact with air. If the story is correct, that may be what the substance was.

  158. RTFM -is- an acronym by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, neither RTFA or RFTA are acronyms. ... An acronym is an abbreviation that is "pronounced as a word".

    No, they're both acronyms. I've always pronounced RTFM as "rutfum" (approximately), and so have many colleagues I know. So there's no reason why RFTA or RTFA can't be "pronounced as a word" also.

    Don't tell me what I can and can't pronounce! ;-) You use SCSI as an example as prnouncable, and that's no more pronouncable than RTFA in my opinion. (ie, they both have too many consonants in a row, so we shove invisible vowels between them to pronounce them.)

    As an aside, I had a discussion once about RTFM being pronounced (someone said it was stupid). I explained that the point of RTFM in the first place is to make it short and convenient instead of saying "read the fscking manual". They agreed. I asked them to say it their way. It took them 4 syllables ("are-tee-eff-em") and slightly more time than it takes me to say "rut-fum" in 2 syllables. Think about it.

  159. Proof of God everywhere by totallygeek · · Score: 2
    Take a look around, friend. Everything you see is evidence that there is a God.


    The same could be proof that Greek mythology is the correct stance on "creation". Everything proves that Zeus and Hera and Mercury and Athena exist. No, wait, everything proves that Hindus have the right answer. Wait a minute, it was the Apache Indians that had it all right. Or, was that the Egyptians? "Everything" proves the Bible right no more than it proves any other religion's creation story.

    1. Re:Proof of God everywhere by thomas.galvin · · Score: 2

      Read what you quoted: "Everything you see is evidence that there is a God." I'll prove the Bible right some other time.

    2. Re:Proof of God everywhere by totallygeek · · Score: 2
      Funny that some people look at the world and say that it proves the existence of God because how else could something come into being. My problem is that if there needs to be a god for creation, then there must also need to be something to create the god of that creation, which would recurse forever god ontop of god. It is a logic circle you cannot escape.

    3. Re:Proof of God everywhere by thomas.galvin · · Score: 2

      Theologically, one of the defining characteistics of God is his self-existance; he requiers nothing else to exist, He simply is.

    4. Re:Proof of God everywhere by Dirtside · · Score: 2

      So you *define* God as "just being," and then use this to prove that he exists? That's called "circular logic" and it doesn't wash here. Try again.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    5. Re:Proof of God everywhere by thomas.galvin · · Score: 2

      No, this has nothing to do with proving His existance; it's a theological explanation of one of His cahracteristics.

    6. Re:Proof of God everywhere by Dirtside · · Score: 2

      You claimed that God is described as self-existing, i.e. requiring nothing else to exist. The obvious corollary to this claim is that God exists. You're trying to say that God exists, and that he's defined as self-existing.

      So where's your actual proof that God exists?

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    7. Re:Proof of God everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok so what's the event that sets off the creation of the universe *without* God?

  160. Why stop at sodium? by physman · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why not use Potassium, it is readily avaibale from electrolysing aquaous potassium permangante. Potassum forms at the negative eletode (CATHODE). Great Fun Physman

    --
    Murphy's Law of Research: Enough research will tend to support your theory.
  161. Most ions are molecules....troll by GMOL · · Score: 1

    An ion is simply a charged atom OR molecule, thus just about every ion is a molecules.
    Here are some other molecules that are ions is solution:

    DNA
    Protien
    Acetate

  162. Re: Funny story or how I learned about amalgams by Pr3d4t0r · · Score: 1

    Real non-funny story from high school chemistry (okay, so maybe it's funny now):

    I had detention in chemistry class and was asked to clean up. Part of the clean up was some spilled mercury a portion of which I appropriated for later "study" at home.

    During this "study" I discovered that the mercury would stick to my gold crucifix that I wore on a gold chain. Intrigued I removed the chain and drug the crucifix through the tiny puddle of mercury.... and then I tried to remove the blobs of mercury from the crucifx and chain when I discovered the mercury would only smear and not detach. What was worse the gold seemed to be absorbing the mercury! Frantic I intended to boil the chain and crucifix when it began to crumble...

    ...and that is how I (and my parents) learned the word amalgam.

  163. Re:The OSS used sodium metal & potassium tabs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever taken a look at the history of your own country over the past 50 years...? Guilty on all charges.

    Too bad you can't actually defend France, instead you have to try to imply that the USA is "just as bad". You didn't bother quoting the *fact* that the French willingly sacrificed the Jews to Hitler. (And they've been burning synagouges again, how charming!) The USA never did anything on the scale of Algeria that wasn't in self defense. We, led by Ronald Reagan, defeated the Communists through a sane policy of containment when the Eurotrash wanted "arms-control" and the insane "Mutually Assured Destruction." France, on the other hand, was the birth place of that ideology, one which killed 100 billion people, an ideology they still worship.

    That may apply to their government, but not the people. Same with the USA.

    Nope. The French culture glorifies laziness, hedonism, sexism, apathy and pseudo-intellectual fads. All it has left is an effete obsolete language that they cling to. Moreover, we can be proud of our government. Our culture elects fair and just leaders. Neither our culture nor our government are perfect, but they are a beacon of freedom and democracy even today.

    All cultures like the French care about is the fact that history has left them on the wayside. A pity, they make such nice pastries.

  164. Re:3.5lb? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, dude, that would be stuff that matters!

  165. Computer Cases by seigel · · Score: 1

    Don't let Mr. Jobs get a hold of this story. He might try and make some computer cases out of the stuff!

    "Explosive computing power, now even more explosive than the magnesium NExT!"

  166. Re:Business.. by harborpirate · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not sure why this keeps getting modded up in every single thread..

    Moderators, I think its time we declared this the new All Your Base/Hot Grits/Natalie Portman/etc "Slashdot catch phrase" (TM). It should be modded down as such. After all, its only funny the first couple hundred times.

    Please check the following link for information on how Slashdot catch phrases (TM) and other Memes work: http://totl.net/Cool/

    You may now continue your regularly scheduled productivity draining activity.

    --
    // harborpirate
    // Slashbots off the starboard bow!
  167. Re:The OSS used sodium metal & potassium tabs by dfj225 · · Score: 1

    Ever since the French killed all the intelligent people in their revolution, their society has just gone down hill.

    --
    SIGFAULT
  168. Mercury Spaghetti by Freshman · · Score: 1

    A couple years back I was just finishing up a batch of spaghetti -- I dumped the cooked spaghetti + boiling water into a strainer in the sink, served it up and proceeded to eat it.

    About halfway through the meal, as the fork was on its way to my mouth, I noticed a metallic looking blob slide down a noodle. Naturally I'm like WTF ... I look into my pasta and see lots of these tiny blobs throughout my dinner. It turns out that someone put a thermometer on a shelf above the sink, and it somehow fell and shattered into it -- right underneath where I put the strainer.

    I have no idea how much I ate.

    --

    ----------
    "They misunderestimated me." --George W Bush, Nov. 6, 2000
    1. Re:Mercury Spaghetti by ethereal · · Score: 1

      I'd be more worried about the broken glass you ate, myself. Although if that was going to get you, it probably already would have.

      I wonder if they make thermometers with safety glass, so that it doesn't shatter into sharp-edged little pieces?

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

  169. Moderate: -1 Stupid by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 2
    None of the other moderations make sense. It's not a troll, it's not redundant. It's not quite funny (until you understand it as stupid).
    It's just stupid

    If you haven't figured it out yet, the stuff that was made in the 50s' is still so radioactive that One is being stored in it's own cast-lead bowl.

    On the other hand stuff made since they realized that they were killing their customers is no longer radioactive -- because they stopped using radioactive elements in the creation!

    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  170. Re:Whyyy by packeteer · · Score: 2

    Actually in still in high school so chill out man.

    --
    unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
  171. Shades of Oliver Sacks by shellbeach · · Score: 1
    This exact proceedure (and many other amusing anecdotes) is described in "Uncle Tungsten: Memories of a Chemical Boyhood" by Oliver Sacks. (London, Picador, 2001). Sacks bought "a good-sized lump of it - about three pounds" and chucked it into Highgate Ponds in Hampstead Heath, London. He relates:

    "It took fire instantly and sped around and around on the surface like a demented meteor, with a huge sheet of yellow flame about it. We all exulted - this was chemistry with a vengeance!" (p.123)

    Sacks also played around with throwing all of the alkali metals (up to Cesium) into water:

    " ... cesium, I found, exploded when it hit the water, shattering its glass container. One never forgot the properties of the alkali metals after this." (ibid)

  172. The infamous baggie bomb! by The_Dougster · · Score: 1

    1. Get a welding torch and fill up a baggie with oxygen and acetylene. Tie it shut.

    2. Make a trail of gasoline out to the middle of the parking lot with nothing around.

    3. Set the baggie there. Go to the other end and light the gas trail.

    Great for lots of laughs, but this is a pretty serious prank and is very likely to bring police, fire trucks, and lots of unwanted attention. It creates a humongous explosion which is ridiculously loud. I've only heard about this one, never seen it in real life.

    --
    Clickety Click ...
    1. Re:The infamous baggie bomb! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've done something kind of like that one, except w/ propane, oxygen and helium.
      1-Fill one 20 gallon garbage bag with propane and oxygen.
      2-Fill 2 more bags with helium.
      3-attach ~30 seconds of the fuse of your choice
      4-light and release.
      5-massive BOOM and a huge fireball about 200' up in the air. Wheeee!

    2. Re:The infamous baggie bomb! by starman97 · · Score: 2

      The really fun part is when the bag blows up as you carry it out to the parking lot due to a static discharge inside it. O2 and acetylene are very dry,
      and opening a trash bag creates a lot of static charge in the inner surface. BOOM!

      --
      Starman97@Gmail.com (bring it on spammers)
  173. The Universe just is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is therefore no reason to ascend to the concept of god(s) in this explanation.

    The Universe is self-existant, it requires nothing else to exist.
    The Universe simply *is*.

  174. you'll live but don't let it happen again by js7a · · Score: 2
    I was playing with a pipette, sucking mercury into it. Then I felt the heavy little droplet hit the back of my throat! I swallowed it! Should I be concerned?

    Pure metalic mercury is not very bioabsorbable in mamillian digestive tracts, unless it had been significantly oxidized. Most of it probably went right through you, and apparently what you did absorb wasn't enough to damage your nervous system enough to keep you from posting to Slashdot. Although mercury accumulates, it is also slowly flushed by the kidneys and liver, so if it was more than a couple years ago you're probably clean, too.

  175. Penny Arcade by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    Tycho: Did you eat a lot of paint as a child?
    Gabe: You mean wall candy?

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  176. Prior art... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a tradition at MIT known as the sodium drop. If it's safe enough for them... :)

  177. The French are cowards by sgtron · · Score: 1

    that's why they hire people from other countries to fight their battles for them. French Foreign
    Legion

    --
    No todo lo que es oro brilla
  178. Feeding the troll by HuguesT · · Score: 1

    OK, the French in question that sold the Jews were the Vichy regime, an extreme right, fascist government put together after France's defeat in 1940. That governement was never elected. De Gaulle's governement in exile in London can't be accused of what the Vichy people did, most of whom fell on hard time after 1945.

    > And they've been burning synagouges again, how
    > charming!

    You are talking about the exact same people: extreme right minority facists who unfortunately still exist in Europe. Go watch American History X or read about the KKK to find out that the US are not immune from these kind of people either.

    > The USA never did anything on the scale of
    > Algeria that wasn't in self defense.

    Let's see: Korea?, Vietnam? the others are too small to count: El Salvador? Nicaragua? With all due respect you are full of **it.

    > We, led by Ronald Reagan, defeated the
    > Communists through a sane policy of containment
    > when the Eurotrash wanted "arms-control" and
    > the insane "Mutually Assured Destruction."

    Reagan, the Hero of the Right, is the one who restarted the arms race with star wars I, and gave
    nice Mr Hussein his weapons of mass destruction, in particular the chemicals and the delivery means (helicopters) with which Hussein took out the Kurds in 1988. In 1989 it took a special vote of Congress to stop the arms sales to Hussein, over Reagan's opinion!

    > France, on the other hand, was the birth place
    > of that ideology, one which killed 100 billion
    > people, an ideology they still worship.

    First MAD has killed exactly 0 people, if it had you would not be here to talk about it by definition, second if any policy has killed 100 BILLION people I wonder where you found them (sure it's not ants?) and third the US is the originator of the idea, being the one who came up with WMD in the first place and are the only country which actually has used them in anger: Hiroshima? Nagasaki?

    > The French culture glorifies laziness, hedonism, > sexism, apathy and pseudo-intellectual fads.

    Really? I thought the Greek were supposed to be lazy, the Italian hedonists, the Arabs of all description sexists, and the Spaniards somnolent.

    For pseudo-intellectual fads you can't beat the Americans: tree hugging Californians? new age aromatherapy? anybody?

    > Our culture elects fair and just leaders.
    > Neither our culture nor our government are
    > perfect, but they are a beacon of freedom and
    > democracy even today.

    Your very own Noam Chomsky writes that if every US president were to be judged against the criteria of the Nuremberg Trial (where the Nazis were judged in 1945) every single one of them would have been hanged. Freedom and democracy for yourself, who cares about everybody else! can you remember Chile? Indonesia? The US governement is a bunch of control freaks who don't give a damn about either their own people (they are selling off their liberties as we speak) or anybody outside the border of their own beloved country.

    In case you don't know, most of the world except possibly a minority of Israeli don't think much of the US, at the moment.

    > A pity, they make such nice pastries.

    Most French pastries are actually Austrian (at least the croissant).

    This last bit proves beyond a single doubt that you don't know what you are talking about.

    Good day to you.

    1. Re:Feeding the troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Actually I was with you until you started in the Chomsky. Chomsky is no more an American than Mao or Stalin. (Actually, that's a pretty good set there [in the mathematical sense].)

  179. Heard of more done.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My high school chemistry teacher worked for a big chemical company in texas before he retired into teaching. They had weekly contests where the winner got to take a 55 gallon drum full of sodium, throw it out into the river attached to some bouyant material, go back to shore, and shoot it with a rifle. of course, this was back before the EPA.

  180. Sodium Cannon (TM) by zootski · · Score: 1

    My brother ( confirmed Physics / Music geek ) sent me this: This is a subject which I am very familiar with, having procured a couple of pounds of sodium from the lab in Argonne IL. As some of the discussions point out, the main thing that happens when you throw sodium into water is that it skips around on the surface, spewing out little fireballs. I decided to overcome this in two ways. The first, which you may have witnessed when we were in high school, was to put a small nugget of sodium into a puddle and then step on it, forcing it to mingle with the water, whereupon it would explode with a bang, spraying blobs of burning molten sodium everywhere (which luckily tended to go away from you as your foot was between you and the sodium).

    I took this further and further until I was going out with my heavy old style hiking boots (as the blast was hurting the soles of my feet) and then holding my leg out in front of me and gingerly lowering my foot onto the sodium, in preparation for the blast, which would blow my foot upwards. Then in Argonne I developed the sodium cannon(tm), where I stuck a blob of sodium onto the bottom of a c-cell battery, and dropped that into a steel tube which had water in the bottom. The stupid thing is, I wasn't thinking about building a cannon, I just wanted the battery to force the sodium to mingle with the water and create a bang. What happened is that the sodium went off with a bang and launched the battery into low earth orbit! I swear the battery was up in the air for something like 8 to 10 seconds before it came down again, looking all weird and shrunken from being imploded by the pressure inside the tube as it was launched. Buwahaha!!!