Slashdot Mirror


H2G2 Cast Finalized, Starts Shooting in April

akahige writes "According to The Hollywood Reporter, Martin Freeman (The Office, Love Actually), Mos Def (Showtime, The Italian Job), and Zooey Deschanel (Big Trouble, Elf) have signed on to play Arthur, Ford, and Trillian, respectively. Stephen Moore is once again doing the voice of Marvin. No word on who's playing Zaphod (but wouldn't Eddie Izzard be great?). It worries me when they say things like, "Adams adapted his own novel for the screen. After his death, Karey Kirkpatrick came aboard for a rewrite." But it's Disney, so what do you expect? Shooting begins in April."

541 comments

  1. What to expect.. by grub · · Score: 5, Funny

    But it's Disney, so what do you expect?

    Probably not what you expect..

    Multiple Hitchiker toys at (McDonalds|Burger King) so people have to make several visits to buy them all.

    Perhaps a Hitchiker Ride at Disney World if the movie proves very successful.

    A DVD release followed soon after by a "collectors edition" release.

    A re-release of the books all spiffied up for the new consumers.

    A movie where quality will be second to the marketting of junk collectibles.

    bah.. /. needs a "+1, Cynical Bastard" mod.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:What to expect.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, I love Douglas Adams and I like that he's popular, without becoming too non-geeky. You can tell a lot about a person if they know anything about Douglas Adams' books. Now every four year old is going to have seen a movie about it, robbing them even of the chance to experience the wonderful world of Douglas Adams *first hand*. I can not imagine what it would be like if I hadn't read the books first and based everything off a movie...

      This would be one of the worst things that could happen to a kid, literarily. Douglas Adams was a memorable portion of my adolescence escape.

    2. Re:What to expect.. by millahtime · · Score: 1

      "A movie where quality will be second to the marketting of junk collectibles."

      Yeah, but the collectables might be worth something in like 2000 years. I want to save them in the origional package.

    3. Re:What to expect.. by grahams · · Score: 3, Funny
      Perhaps a Hitchiker Ride at Disney World if the movie proves very successful.
      Yeah, and then 20 years from now they will make a movie based on the ride.
    4. Re:What to expect.. by petabyte · · Score: 5, Funny

      bah.. /. needs a "+1, Cynical Bastard" mod.

      I believe its called "insightful" :)

    5. Re:What to expect.. by shystershep · · Score: 1

      Lord of the Rings. 'Nuff said.

      --
      The bigotry of the nonbeliever is for me nearly as funny as the bigotry of the believer. - Albert Einstein
    6. Re:What to expect.. by grub · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Now every four year old is going to have seen a movie about it, robbing them even of the chance to experience the wonderful world of Douglas Adams *first hand*.

      So true. I'd love to know the stats of the people which paid to see the LotR trilogy multiple times, bought the various DVD editions, plastic cups from some fast-food dive but haven't read the books and have no intention of doing so.
      I'm not knocking Jackson or the movies, I think he did as good a job as could have been done, but no amount of CGI can beat the infinite movie screen of the imagination when fueled by a good book.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    7. Re:What to expect.. by thegoofy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, I can see the advertising blitz now...

      "Towels in the kids meals - Yes, Kids! You can hide from your parents simply by placing this over your head!"

      "This weeks special, the so long and thanks for all the McFish"

    8. Re:What to expect.. by adler187 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That would be McDonalds. I used to work at BK so I would know. BK only has the crappy Nickelodeon toys and other Non-Disney animation toys. And they wonder why BK sales are worse than MDonalds.

      I once had a lady ask me if the most important part of her kid's Kids Meal was in there as I handed her food out the Drive-Thru window. I asked her what the most important part was, and she said, "The Toy of course!" Kids dont care about the food, its all about the toy. Just my $.2

    9. Re:What to expect.. by bigjnsa500 · · Score: 1

      You forgot.........

      and

      * Profit!

      --
      This is a test. This is a test of the emergency sig system. This has been only a test.
    10. Re:What to expect.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heheh! I suddenly feel better about myself :) Thanks..

    11. Re:What to expect.. by Analogy+Man · · Score: 1
      Multiple Hitchiker toys at (McDonalds|Burger King) so people have to make several visits to buy them all.

      *Peril sensitive glasses (do not wear while driving)

      *A little plastic fish you cram in your ear

      *An action figure of the triple breasted whore of erotica 6...

      That Dan Akroyd character from '70's vintage SNL hawking the plastic bag space helmet and a dr's toy kit with pieces of medical waste would have a field day.

      --
      When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.
    12. Re:What to expect.. by Frymaster · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      A movie where quality will be second to the marketting of junk collectibles

      ah disney. they took victor hugo's classic "the hunchback of notre dame" and gave us...

      the lunchbox of notre dame.

    13. Re:What to expect.. by Golias · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I'd love to know the stats of the people which paid to see the LotR trilogy multiple times, bought the various DVD editions, plastic cups from some fast-food dive but haven't read the books and have no intention of doing so.

      Here's your stats:

      Total: 0.
      Margin of error: Not enough to worry about.

      People who have not read the books tend to see them each once at the theater, and come out saying "a pretty good action flick, but kinda slow at times."

      The psycho-fans who are buying little Gollum statues and set pieces off eBay are people who read The Silmarillion twice (but claim to have read it three times.)

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    14. Re:What to expect.. by grub · · Score: 2, Informative


      ..and she said, "The Toy of course!" Kids dont care about the food, its all about the toy.

      I highly recommend you read Fast Food Nation. The author goes into some detail about marketting to children. Some parts are a bit alarmist but overall it's a thought-provoking read.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    15. Re:What to expect.. by netringer · · Score: 2, Informative
      I can not imagine what it would be like if I hadn't read the books first and based everything off a movie...
      I may be wrong, but as I remember HHGG was a BBC radio serial script first. Then it was a BBC TV mini-series. THEN it was a book. The book might have come before the TV show. All the versions were slightly different.

      Maybe the radio listeners thought the visual versions ruined it for THEM!

      --
      Ever dream you could fly? Get up from the Flight Sim. I Fly
    16. Re:What to expect.. by pyros · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My first exposure to Adams was as a child, seeing it on television in England. I didn't read the books until the past 5 years, and I think they were more enjoyable, because I had seen some of the TV stuff already. Anyone who wants to read the books still can. Anyone who wouldn't have read them anyways won't be missing out if they see the movie instead. Take a deep breath and relax.

    17. Re:What to expect.. by pyros · · Score: 1

      I've never read the LotR books. I saw the cartoon movie of the first two books and was utterly confused by the ending. I never read the books because I always found the Hobbit to be a slow read. I thought the PJ's movies kicked some major ass. I intend to get the special edition DVDs, but I don't have any intention of reading the books, nor did I before seeing the movies. They are just too many scenes that I think would be ultra-slow to read through, and I don't like that. ;)

    18. Re:What to expect.. by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      > You can tell a lot about a person if they know anything about Douglas Adams' books.

      Hmmm, does this come off as 'geek snobbiness' to anyone else?

      > This would be one of the worst things that could happen to a kid, literarily

      You've lived a sheltered life, literarily.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    19. Re:What to expect.. by PedanticSpellingTrol · · Score: 0

      hey, don't forget the pocket fluff and life-size microscopic space fleet!

    20. Re:What to expect.. by Mononoke · · Score: 3, Funny
      You can tell a lot about a person if they know anything about Douglas Adams' books.
      Yeah, just ask them if they can figure out how the couch got stuck in the stairwell. If the don't know, then pass 'em by.

      --
      NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
    21. Re:What to expect.. by Iffy+Bonzoolie · · Score: 5, Informative

      cross-posting this from IMDB boards (yay, a quote of a quote of a quote):

      by The Duke of Dunstable:

      For those of you who are worried about the Disney involvement of the movie, here's what Douglas said about it in December, 1998.

      "First of all, I have not tried to 'downplay' Disney's role in this. Disney is the studio which is making this movie, which is financing it, which will be distributing it. It couldn't really be much more central to the project.

      What I have tried to explain is that people's ideas of who or what Disney is is a little out of date. Yes, it made Bambi and Snow White and Flubber, but it also made Pulp Fiction, The Rock, etc., etc. It is a huge entertainment corporation, one part of which still makes what it originally made, i.e. family entertainment. So to talk about 'Disney-fying' Hitchhiker makes as much sense as saying 'Columbia-fying' it or 'Universal-fying' it. Yes, each studio has its strengths and weaknesses at any moment, depending on who's running what, but generalisations based on Bambi no longer apply. The important issues as far as I'm concerned is - who are the individual people I'm working with? The director, the producer, the studio executive etc. As things stand at the moment, I'm feeling very happy, confident and well looked after. But we have a huge task and huge challenges. Let's see how it goes."

      --
      Run a pencil-and-paper RPG campaign with your far-off friends: Gametable!
    22. Re:What to expect.. by Popageorgio · · Score: 1

      And a towel.

    23. Re:What to expect.. by entrigant · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Whoa obession... think maybe over dramatizing a bit?

    24. Re:What to expect.. by YOU+LIKEWISE+FAIL+IT · · Score: 3, Funny
      Multiple Hitchiker toys at (McDonalds|Burger King) so people have to make several visits to buy them all.

      I will gleefully whore out my favourite childhood novel if I can get a plastic Vogon figure with my Bugblatter Burger of Traal.

      YLFI
      --
      One god, one market, one truth, one consumer.
    25. Re:What to expect.. by tenchima · · Score: 1

      IIRC, it was a radio series, a book and then a TV series. What's more, they also released it on audio CD, and THAT was different to the radio series....

      --
      If at first you don't succeed, so much for skydiving.
    26. Re:What to expect.. by cetan · · Score: 1

      DNA talks a lot in "Salmon of Doubt" about his numerous problems with Disney and Hollywood in general and getting an acceptable script for the movie.

      Having someone do a re-write of the script after his death is Disney's way of raping the corpse.

      --
      In Soviet Russia...michael would be rotting in Siberia!
    27. Re:What to expect.. by DrLZRDMN · · Score: 1

      twenty cents well I see someone has a strong opinion...

    28. Re:What to expect.. by TedTschopp · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I love J.R.R. Tolkien and I like that he's popular, without becoming too non-geeky. You can tell a lot about a person if they know anything about Tolkiens' books. Now every four year old is going to have seen a movie about it, robbing them even of the chance to experience the wonderful world of Middle-earth *first hand*. I can not imagine what it would be like if I hadn't read the books first and based everything off a movie...

      This would be one of the worst things that could happen to a kid, literarily. Tolkien was a memorable portion of my adolescence escape.

      --
      Fantasy remains a human right; we make in our measure and in our derivative mode... -- JRR Tolkien
    29. Re:What to expect.. by MemoryAid · · Score: 1
      Share and enjoy!

      Charge into life with a plastic boy. Put him down by your side, let your head be your guide...

      I forget the rest.

      --
      Language students: Don't try to learn English here. This ain't it.
    30. Re:What to expect.. by Schnapple · · Score: 3, Informative

      Don't forget the computer game, which followed the plot of the book to a certian point, then took a hard right.

    31. Re:What to expect.. by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Kids dont care about the food, its all about the toy. Just my $.2

      Ironically, $.2 is about what fast food toys are worth. Kids are dumb.

    32. Re:What to expect.. by TexVex · · Score: 4, Informative
      People who have not read the books tend to see them each once at the theater, and come out saying "a pretty good action flick, but kinda slow at times."


      The movie Starship Troopers actually spurred sales of the original novel Starship Troopers. Despite the movie being a horrible rendition of the book (emphasis on the "rend"). I may be mistaken but I think the movie actually launched the book back into the bestseller lists (the first time would be when it was first published and won a Hugo award).
      --
      Fun with Anagarams! LADS HOST, SHALT DOS. HAS DOLTS. AD SLOTHS, HATS SOLD. ASS HO, LTD.
    33. Re:What to expect.. by TheFlamingoKing · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I would say the worst thing that could happen to a kid literarily would be to not learn how to read.

    34. Re:What to expect.. by TomV · · Score: 1

      [quote]Parents of younf organic lifeforms are warned that towels can be harmful if swallowed in large quantities.[/quote]

      The Book's closing comment at the end of Fit The Tenth (In which our heroes have some close encounters with others and themselves. ARTHUR: "It's not a question of whose habitat it is, it's a question of how hard you hit it")

      Douglas already had all the best jokes in 1981.

    35. Re:What to expect.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The audio CD were taken from the Radio show recordings.

    36. Re:What to expect.. by gamgee5273 · · Score: 1
      HEY! Those cups aren't plastic - they're actually glass.

      And I didn't buy them, my wife did. :p

      Plus I've read LOTR four or five times in my life, so I really don't fit your mold...

      But don't knock the cheesy glasses!

    37. Re:What to expect.. by pyros · · Score: 1
      How about the power to kill a yak from 200 yards away? With MIND BULLETS!

      That's telekinesis!

    38. Re:What to expect.. by Golias · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Makes sense. Starship Troopers was a largely forgotten novel as far as most people were concerned until the movie came out and provoked teaming throngs of nerds to loudly complain that they were pissing on a classic work, prompting people to want to see what all the fuss was about. The backlash against the movie probably created more hype than the book ever enjoyed.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    39. Re:What to expect.. by TomV · · Score: 5, Funny

      * Counter staff with Genuine People Personalities (tm)

      * A cup of something which tastes almost (but not entirely) unlike tea.

      * Shoes that not only do not fit, but which are actually joined at the heels.

      DNA was always a bit close to the bone.

    40. Re:What to expect.. by sadomikeyism · · Score: 1
      Now every four year old is going to have seen a movie about it, robbing them even of the chance to experience the wonderful world of Douglas Adams *first hand*.

      Do you mean that Doug Adams read the books to you personally? WOW. I had to read his books by myself, i.e. second hand.

      I wonder who got the product placement on the towels...

      --
      "Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves
    41. Re:What to expect.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CD? Damned youth of the world... try AUDIO CASSETTE !!!

      I still enjoy listening to the Doug Adams reading of all 5 books in the increasingly inaccurately named 'HitchHikers Trilogy'

    42. Re:What to expect.. by jafac · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't forget the lawyers putting the kibosh on the Babelfish and Learning to Fly, due to potential liability lawsuits ("My son Bobby put a Trout in his ear, and now he's deaf. I want 25 million dollars!" or "My daughter Suzie jumped off the roof trying to miss the ground, and broke her neck, and I want 50 million dollars!")

      So, the Babelfish will need to be wrapped in a towel and placed on the head,
      and Flying? well, with Disney, we're talking about at faerie dust, right?

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    43. Re:What to expect.. by Evil+Pete · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was very disappointed in the books because I thought the radio series was sooo amazing. It just didn't seem to capture the atmosphere even though the words were the same ... like the wry voice of the book which said a lot by the way it was said. I read the books but it just wasn't the same, and the tv series was another couple of notches further down the scale.

      --
      Bitter and proud of it.
    44. Re:What to expect.. by ManoMarks · · Score: 1

      This will probably be modded down, but I have to say whenever Starship Troopers comes on cable, I watch at least part of it. I actually liked it, stilted acting and all. I thought it wasn't a good rendition of the original, but a good update. Kind of like Clueless was for...I want to say "Emma". The universe that was created was far more compelling than the characters, of course, but that was true of the original as well. And the subtext on propaganda was great.

      --

      That's gotta fit into your schema somewhere

    45. Re:What to expect.. by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      No, they weren't, not entirely at any rate. Some of the music used in the audio series was copyright and they couldn't get permissions to re-use it, so they had to re-record those bits.

    46. Re:What to expect.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps a Hitchiker Ride at Disney World if the movie proves very successful.

      Is it just me or does this seem like one of the more poorly titled rides?

      "Okay kids, time to go on the 'Hitchhiker Ride'. Bye!" Vrrroooommm... (as the parents drive off). Or perhaps something "Natural Born Killers"-esque.

      If it happens, I think Disney will give that ride a different name.

    47. Re:What to expect.. by katarac · · Score: 1
      but no amount of CGI can beat the infinite movie screen of the imagination when fueled by a good book.
      Thanks, Geordi. Almost expected you to follow with, "But you don't have to take my word for it!"
    48. Re:What to expect.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      while you're point is on track "...one of the worst things that could happen..., literally"...um no

      don't be an overly pretentious ass and try to enjoy the movie.

    49. Re:What to expect.. by JivanMukti · · Score: 1

      same here, I will gleefully toss out the crap (food?) from McD's if I can get a plastic figure of Eccentrica Gallumbits!

    50. Re:What to expect.. by PhotoBoy · · Score: 1

      The full jingle was this IIRC: Share and enjoy, share and enjoy, Go through life with a plastic boy, Or girl by your side, Let your pal be your guide, [fanfare] Go stick your head in a pig.

    51. Re:What to expect.. by Neop2Lemus · · Score: 1
      I disagree.

      LotRs has opened up entire new venues of conversation with people who normally wouldn't be interested in that sort of thing. What kind of venues? Women.

      --
      Needle Nardle Noo
    52. Re:What to expect.. by ifreakshow · · Score: 1

      ...Just my $.2...
      This inflation is getting out of control. Damn you GW!

    53. Re:What to expect.. by MROD · · Score: 1

      Of course, the Pan_Galactic Gargle Blaster will be an incipid alco-pop with a an alcohol content of about 0.1% proof.

      Drinking it will be like having your skull bashed in with a slice of lemon, without the large gold brick. ie. messy and totally pointless with no effect whatsoever.

      --

      Agrajag: "Oh no, not again!"
    54. Re:What to expect.. by Mantorp · · Score: 1
      Regarding Starship Troopers, I didn't like the book nor the movie. I went to the library to get the book when the movie came out then hoping the movie was better than the book waited till it came on cable to see it.
      Feel guilty for not contributing to the Hollywood economy more. I thought Battlefield Earth was an even worse book so I won't watch the movie at all.

      My vote for worst book/movie combo goes to Sliver.

    55. Re:What to expect.. by janeil · · Score: 1
      Well, you know, the radio show came before the books, so maybe the only true experience of the guide was to happen upon it one looooonnnngggg night back in the 70's on some public radio station, and get hooked. The books were never as good, I thought.

      I can not imagine what it would be like if I hadn't heard the radio show first and based everything off the books...

      But hey, maybe it's a GOOD THING to appreciate quality works of art, however one is led to them, perhaps? Maybe elitism is kind of tiresome? I thought it was great that (the late great) Douglas Adams made a career out of hitchhiker, what a hoot. And I get a kick out of all the fans he picked up along the way, and don't think they missed out all that much, and I did love the books, too.

      I think most interested people will pursue the source of these types of movies, and come to realize the original format was usually a more powerful work of art.

      Of course I'm referring to the original radio show.

    56. Re:What to expect.. by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Perhaps a Hitchiker Ride at Disney World if the movie proves very successful.

      Yes, they give you this plastic thing called a 'thumb' you press a button, vanish, land in the hold of a ship filled with hulking yellow rubbery guys, and the earth is destroyed and you spend a while listening to horrible poetry.

      The only real problem with the ride is you can only do it once.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    57. Re:What to expect.. by iantri · · Score: 1
      Bah. They'll be cheap and give the kids a Microscopic space fleet (left side of picture).

      If you don't get it, read the packaging section of this site.

    58. Re:What to expect.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Disney ride will be a three mile long line, and instructions to stick your thumb out.

    59. Re:What to expect.. by zedenne · · Score: 1

      i agree.

      i cam at it all rather obtusely, reading the restaurant at the end of the universe first, then life the universe etc., then hitchhikers.

      then i heard the radio show on tape and thought that was way better, especially all that bbc radiophonics workshop stuff.

      then i saw the tv show and that was a bit terrible.

      then so long and thanks for all the fish came out. that was ok but a little tired.

      then mostly harmless, which i liked because it was familiar, but it really stretched the characters / plot / pseudo science stuff a bit too far.

      dirk gently rocks though, and last chance to see is great!

      anyway after all this rambling the reality of this news just dawned on me.

      this movie will be terrible. i mean truly awful. its disney!

      lotr is bad enough (no mum, i don't want a 'the one ring' (30$ gold plated special edition one ring to rule them all!!! (tm)), but this will be unconscionable.

      hhgg is rife with tongue in cheek sinicism that will be diluted to hell to make it 'marketable'.

      rant over.

      i'm off to bed to cry into my zaphod b. pillowcases.

    60. Re:What to expect.. by skzbass · · Score: 0

      Your 20cents? Wow i feel really special now!
      --I did see the bitish TV version and even if disney does a horrible job i dont think that they can beat the brits. boy was it bad. But in other book to movie news, I hear they're planning a remake of the Narnia movies. The orginal ones by PBS weren't bad, but this is a real imagination crusher. I think that the Narnia books beat out HHGG for the special place in my heart.

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    61. Re:What to expect.. by blamanj · · Score: 1

      What I have tried to explain is that people's ideas of who or what Disney is is a little out of date. Yes, it made Bambi and Snow White and Flubber, but it also made Pulp Fiction, The Rock, etc., etc.

      While that statement is factually correct, it doesn't really convey how things work. Pulp Fiction was released under the Miramax name, and there are no mouse ears visible anywhere. Unless you know the ins and out of corporate ownership, you don't associated Disney with Pulp Fiction.

      So, a lot will depend on which label THHG is released under.

    62. Re:What to expect.. by DarthTaco · · Score: 1

      I've only just recently read hitchhiker, and I liked it. Probably not my favorite book, but it had some moments that just made me crack up. I have to say that I really didn't like zaphod though, and only because of his appearance. For me it detracted from the story. I kept having to remind myself that he had two heads, and I was never quite sure which one was speaking at any given moment.

      But it probably says something favorable that the appearance (as in how he looked, not an introduction) of a character in a book was described so well that it invoked an emotional repsonse. And by this I don't mean edgar allen poe or stephen king verbal diarrhea descriptions, but just that the author was able to convey a discription so well.

      You can tell a lot about a person if they know anything about Douglas Adams' books.

      so what does that tell you about me then?

    63. Re:What to expect.. by Darren+Winsper · · Score: 1

      What is it with lawyers? It's just evolution. Survival of the fittest, death to the dumbest, it's all the same thing.

    64. Re:What to expect.. by Slurm-V · · Score: 3, Informative

      From memory: (at work - but it's lunchtime) Share and Enjoy, Share and Enjoy Journey through life with a plastic boy Or Girl by your side, let your pal be your guide And when it breaks down or starts to annoy Or grinds when it moves and gives you no joy Cos it eats up your hat or has sex with your cat Bled oil on your floor or ripped off your door And you get to the point you can't stand any more Bring it to us, we won't give a fig We'll tell you, 'Go stick your head in a pig Thank you, ladies and gentlement. I'll be here all week. Try the veal, it's rumptastic.

      --
      Of course it's going off the rails. How else is it ever going to fly?
    65. Re:What to expect.. by Angostura · · Score: 1

      Books? Pah! Reading the HHGTHG robs a person of the chance to experience the wonderful world of Douglas Adams *first hand* - in the fabulous radio series.

    66. Re:What to expect.. by rocjoe71 · · Score: 1

      Interesting, but book sales does not mean the same as books read!

      --
      Height: 38U, Weight: 0 Newtons, Eyes: #0000FF, OS: Gray Matter 1.0 (Alpha)
    67. Re:What to expect.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geordi? As in Laforge?

    68. Re:What to expect.. by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1

      I had my doubts before. But Disney involvement, that's the kiss of death. The Disney market pimps will drive this to be full of special effects and dumbed down content for the American teen market. I suppose the DVD will have 15 minutes of commercials for Disney's The Black Hole. My original suspicions over a music video director doing this are not relieved. The only good part of this is the screenwriter, who did Chicken Run and The Little Vampire. But a good screenplay can be munged easily under pressure from above.

    69. Re:What to expect.. by TexVex · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ok, I'm straying totally off topic now. Mod me down, whatever.

      You might be surprised. The book was written and first published in "younger" and more "innocent" times, and it caused quite a controversy. Not quite so much as Stranger in a Strange Land, but Starship Troopers wasn't an easily ignored thing. It portrayed women in combat roles as pilots of spaceships. It portrayed non-white and/or non-American characters in most (if not all) of the key roles. It portrayed a society in which the right to vote or hold office was gained only through military service. It contained public flogging and public hanging. It described "police action" that closely parallelled U.S. activities in Korea and later Vietnam -- some of these were acts we would consider terrorism today!

      Aside from being controversial, the novel was also hugely inventive. The MI piloted what amounts to Robotech battle mechs.

      Now go look up the first publish date and realize that all that was written probably before you were born.

      --
      Fun with Anagarams! LADS HOST, SHALT DOS. HAS DOLTS. AD SLOTHS, HATS SOLD. ASS HO, LTD.
    70. Re:What to expect.. by Rallion · · Score: 1

      This is true. Douglas Adams is meant to be read. I don't know if you ever saw the BBC series, but much of it is taken straight out of the book -- literally. Pages-long quotes from the guide. And that's really far, far better if you've read it before, you know? Otherwise, it just comes at you all too fast, you get confused more than entertained. A good example of how a scene can be funnier if you've read the book is the poetry scene. The repeated, "Arthur lolled," Is far, far funnier than actually seeing a person loll. Of course, with my previous experience, I laughed, because I knew the hilarity the show was attempting to capture.

      I'm torn, really. I want to see a high-quality movie version, for myself. But I'll be damned if I let anybody I know see it before they read it. It's really not fair to them, since the movie is meaningless, except that it rabs a future first reading of most of the humor. And I can't save everybody from that!

    71. Re:What to expect.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the question is, how did they get it THROUGH the stairwell.

    72. Re:What to expect.. by Progman3K · · Score: 1

      >But it's Disney, so what do you expect?
      > ...

      You forgot one thing about Disney:

      In a few years, they'll claim to be the creators and owners of H2G2.

      Just like they did with Sleeping Beauty, Winnie the Pooh, Beauty and the Beast, etc...

      --
      I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
    73. Re:What to expect.. by Disavian · · Score: 1

      I don't know how they would fit any measure of the irony, the satire, the wonderful humor on which I feel the book is based, into a ride. Sure, you can take kids, throw them onto a metal box, and shoot that box around in a circle-- but that is nothing compared to what I think of H2G2 as, a literary masterpiece.

      A good secondary rendition of something that I can recall is the French release of Notre Dame De Paris in an opera-- excellent singing, the songs are so addictive, and so well sung.

      Twenty? Try ten, max. Don't want people forgetting about the movie...

    74. Re:What to expect.. by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      H2G2 2: Honey, I blew up Earth.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    75. Re:What to expect.. by RackinFrackin · · Score: 2, Informative

      Reading the HHGTHG robs a person of the chance to experience the wonderful world of Douglas Adams *first hand*

      No it doesn't. The books weren't the original version of the story, but since they were written by DNA himself, they do give DNA's first-hand account of the story.

    76. Re:What to expect.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then, they'd have to make a ride based on the ride-based movie, and this would trigger a chain reaction that would take disney beyond the Self-Referencing Ride Event Horizon to a point where the company can do nothing more than manufacture H2G2 related items -- and hopefully forget to have Congress renew their copyrights.

    77. Re:What to expect.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reading Rainbow.

    78. Re:What to expect.. by BiggyP · · Score: 1

      i'm afraid i listened to the Radio4 series prior to reading the books, but i don't think that damaged my enjoyment of them in any way shape or form, now, on the other hand, if i'd seen that god awful television series first, that would've completely robbed me of the experience delivered by books or radio.

      i guess we'll just have to wait and see how badly disney screws it up...

    79. Re:What to expect.. by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Starship Troopers was great, and it made me read Starship Troopers, wich was awsome too.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    80. Re:What to expect.. by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 1
      Newbie :-)

      I remember hearing the very first broadcast radio play- and it was much better than the book (although the books rock in their own way). The sound effects and the music was missing in the book, strangely enough :-), and yet evoked things that the TV program was unable.

      I personally don't think that even Peter Jackson could turn this into a movie, but we'll see; oh ok, perhaps he could, but nobody else could.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    81. Re:What to expect.. by Radius9 · · Score: 1

      That was done intentionally. Douglas Adams co-wrote the text for the Infocom game, and it was all done under his watch. He himself stated that he liked the different variations, which is why the BBC radio play is different from the book which is different from the game.

    82. Re:What to expect.. by iNetRunner · · Score: 1

      Wonder how well looked after he is now.. :/ Not much resisting changes at least.

      --
      Store with salt
    83. Re:What to expect.. by y0bhgu0d · · Score: 1

      o/~ reading rainboooooooow o/~

      thanks for bringing up memories that i never wanted to relive.

    84. Re:What to expect.. by mbourgon · · Score: 1

      no amount of CGI can beat the infinite movie screen of the imagination when fueled by a good book

      Fortunately for us, they made a movie based off the Lord of the Rings books instead. You're right, but LOTR were not good books. They were written to showcase the languages. I read the first one, and didn't bother to read the other two. Groundbreaking fantasy, created the genre, yadda yadda. I found the book dull, boring, and not nearly as good as the movie.

      Flame away.

      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    85. Re:What to expect.. by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Yes. It started as a radio series, then veered into *radically different* territory for the second series. It was about the man controlling the universe. It was also written as it was shot, due to be aired later that night, thanks to Adam's terrible lateness. I strongly recommend picking up a copy of the radio scripts.

      The books came next. Then the aborted TV series.

    86. Re:What to expect.. by AmicoToni · · Score: 1

      I agree with your comment. The great characteristic of HG2G is that you can picture the situation in your mind as you wish, since it's all so absurd. When everything is fixed in a movie, you no longer have that ability.

      The same, I am sure, happened to everyone who watched the Mary Poppins movie before reading the books. I am always surprised by all those who do not realize that Mary Poppins, before being an edulcorated Disney movie, is a series of (five?) books whose poetry and magic are wonderful, great to stimulate the imagination of a child.

      It saddens me to think that one day people could say "Oh, the Guide? The Disney movie?"

    87. Re:What to expect.. by cujo_1111 · · Score: 1

      Way offtopic reference... Rainbows! I hate those things.

      --
      If I point out that you are incorrect, making me a foe does not make you any more correct.
    88. Re:What to expect.. by Golias · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Now go look up the first publish date and realize that all that was written probably before you were born.

      1984 was written in 1948.

      Brave New World was written in 1931.

      Heinlein was far from the first to use sci-fi as a cautionary tale about the dangers of modern political trends. (The first popular example I can think of is H.G. Wells, with "The Time Machine" in 1895.)

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    89. Re:What to expect.. by webfiend · · Score: 1

      "A cup of something which tastes almost (but not entirely) unlike tea."

      I thought they already served that. But the upgrade to Genuine People Personalities(tm) for the staff will be a nice switch.

    90. Re:What to expect.. by Fat+Cow · · Score: 1

      such a dull book

      make camp...
      blah blah blah
      make camp...
      blah blah blah
      make camp...
      chapters of boring poetry...
      make camp...
      blah blah blah
      etc

      --
      stay frosty and alert
    91. Re:What to expect.. by Gleng · · Score: 1

      Why don't they just stick fucking Jar Jar Binks in it and be done with it. The movie's going to blow goats as it is, why not go all out and *completely* ruin it.

      "Mesa turning into a penguin! Mesa betta stop it! wooooAAAAAAH!!" Followed by 10 minutes of him running around knocking things over. Bastard.

      Seriously, Adams wrote what was probably a perfectly good screenplay, and Disney are going to collectively destroy what was possably the last thing he ever wrote.

      Oh well, I couldn't expect anything more than the shameless milking of the Hitchhiker name from Disney.

      --
      "Proudly Posting Without Reading The Article"
    92. Re:What to expect.. by vxvxvxvx · · Score: 1

      Isn't Douglas Adams the same guy who couldn't come to an agreement with Disney on choosing actors, the movie script, etc and actually broke off the deal? If he was still alive, would this movie be getting made?

    93. Re:What to expect.. by arcum42 · · Score: 1

      Marvin humming Pink Floyd, for example...

    94. Re:What to expect.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Over his dead body ... (posting anonymously out of respect for the dead)

    95. Re:What to expect.. by mo^ · · Score: 1

      US and UK versions of the book were different too. AS well as the slightly modified compedium of the entire "trilogy" (before the 5th one was released)

      "Most gratuitous use of the word FUCKin a serious scrren play" anyone?

      --
      bah!*@%!
    96. Re:What to expect.. by mo^ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Please try to read some stuff about douglas. (even the "salmon of doubt" should give you enough back ground..

      He considered himself a script writer and was happier writing mostly for radio and televison (doctor who anyone?)

      Saying he was meant to be read is just silly. The guiy loved technology and media in all its forms (the web, games, books, radio, tv), i think douglas just _was_

      --
      bah!*@%!
    97. Re:What to expect.. by condensate · · Score: 1

      Perhaps earth now finally gets to taste a REAL Gynnantonic...

      --
      Black holes were created when god tried to divide by zero
    98. Re:What to expect.. by mrw28 · · Score: 1

      Hands up if you listened to it on the radio before reading the books?

      Okay, not me - but I have since and you should give it a go. I've got a big old tape box set of the original radio series' and it's a joy. Was going to upgrade to CD but I think it's been discontinued. Bah!

    99. Re:What to expect.. by MartinB · · Score: 1
      Multiple Hitchiker toys at (McDonalds|Burger King) so people have to make several visits to buy them all.

      Sure. And you just know that they're going to have Genuine People Personalities and sold as Your Plastic Pal Who's Fun To Be With.

      --

      The only thing you can accurately describe as "Scotch" is a sticky tape made by 3M. And it's

    100. Re:What to expect.. by Rallion · · Score: 1

      Okay. "Meant to be read" was terrible phrasing. I still say it's BEST read, though -- at least the stuff he put in regular old books. It's just that pretty much every sentence is full of wit and intelligence, and it's not ossible to capture it all without simply reading it out loud. I think the description of Arthur's work as Sandwich Maker is a great example of that, and it doesn't lend too well to narration, either. That's not to say, of course, that any adaptations of any of his works are a bad thing, it's just that he could write in a way that was better than can be captured in other mediums (Including a simple book-on-tape, in my opinion...there are some things you need to go back and read again.)

    101. Re:What to expect.. by Ultra64 · · Score: 1

      I hate 'em too! You know, you'll just be sitting there, minding your own business, and they'll come marching in and crawling up your leg and start biting the inside of your ass, and you'll be all like "Ay! Get out of my ass, you stupid rainbows!"

    102. Re:What to expect.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the LOTR series was recently voted as 'greatest book' by the UK public in a massive BBC series. Although the show host and several celebrity guests did suggest that they weren't sure that all the voters had actually read it...

      It was probably helped by some heavy fan voting, which also put H2G2 in 4th place. (Pride & Prejudice at #2, His Dark Materials trilogy at #3 and Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire at #5).

    103. Re:What to expect.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are there any spoilers?

      I never managed to get out of the Heart of Gold.

    104. Re:What to expect.. by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 1

      I can't wait for the triple breasted whore action figure tho....

      --
      And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
    105. Re:What to expect.. by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 1

      ... But it couldn't be the original "a really hot cup of tea" though could it.... some dumbass would spill it on their lap and sue.....

      --
      And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
    106. Re:What to expect.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recently found my HHGTTG tapes (First series) behind the CD rack. I knew I had them, I knew they were there, but I didn't know one of the tapes was out of the case and cacked in dust. Gargh!

      I'll have to set myself up & record the tapes to FLAC or transfer them to CD..

    107. Re:What to expect.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the parent it right and you need an expensive CAD modelling package.

    108. Re:What to expect.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shoes that not only do not fit, but which are actually joined at the heels.

      We need more shoe shops.

    109. Re:What to expect.. by bobbuck · · Score: 1

      I don't have any Vogon action figures, but I do have some high quality Vogon poetry audio tapes to trade for a good towel...

    110. Re:What to expect.. by Y2KDragon · · Score: 1
      "This weeks special, the so long and thanks for all the McFish"
      No fair making me splort my coffee. You owe me a new monitor.
    111. Re:What to expect.. by mewsik · · Score: 1

      I actually expect to see '42' Hitchiker toys at McDonalds.

    112. Re:What to expect.. by MsRee · · Score: 1

      No spoilers that I'm aware of, just some great lines. If you play again and want to avoid getting stuck, you might check out the unofficial Infocom homepage -- they have online InvisiClues to help you out.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, TV watches you!
    113. Re:What to expect.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The books were a spin-off after the success of the radio show which was the best thing since the goons. When I first heard it, it blew me away, and there hasn't been anything like it since. What we need is the 4 years olds crowded round listening to the radiogram like their dad used to.

    114. Re:What to expect.. by wpanderson · · Score: 1

      There is past precedent here for the parent entity to be associated with sibling companies hiccups - Dogma had it's distribution sold on from Miramax to Bob and Harvey Weinstein personally, then onto Lion's Gate, all due to some Christian types screaming bloody murder for Disney's decision to distribute a steaming pile of blasphemy. When Lion's Gate picked up Dogma, the Christian protesty types declared that they had "won", while the movie still got to play in theatres (as related by Kevin Smith in his Audience With ... DVD, cf JamMovies)

      IMO, DNA had it spot on - who actually cares if Disney, Sony, Fox, whoever were making this movie?

      Note that Yahoo! Movies has HHGTTG listed as being distributed by Touchstone, so it's likely the central Disney brand won't be used for it.

      --
      neuro at well dot com (when I post, it's my opinions, no-one elses)
    115. Re:What to expect.. by wpanderson · · Score: 1

      Lawyers? To the 'B' Ark with them all!!

      --
      neuro at well dot com (when I post, it's my opinions, no-one elses)
  2. Disney by funny-jack · · Score: 5, Funny

    But it's Disney, so what do you expect?

    Umm... a happy ending?

    --
    You probably shouldn't click this.
    1. Re:Disney by ispepalocacoc · · Score: 1

      Or a dead mother....mothers are often already dead or die in disney movies.

      --
      I Love Alberta Beef
    2. Re:Disney by KingKire64 · · Score: 1

      Along the same lines...
      disney could screw up a wet dream.

      --
      "All I can tell the "lesser of two evils" folks is that if they keep voting for evil, they'll keep getting evil."-Lp.org
    3. Re:Disney by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 0

      Or kill em both, like in The Lion King ;)

    4. Re:Disney by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      I guess that's not too hard. The Guide mostly does end on a happy note, even if it's a happy-but-stranded-on-earth-in-the-prehistoric-pas t note. Assuming they end it in the same spot, which would make sense since the first series of the original radio play feels about the same sort of length as a movie, albeit a long movie.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    5. Re:Disney by Draknor · · Score: 1

      You mean, Disney hired goatse.cx guy????

      Won't somebody please think of THE CHILDREN???? :-)

  3. Zombies on the board by phoenix321 · · Score: 4, Funny

    After his death, Karey Kirkpatrick came aboard for a rewrite.

    Written in hell. No doubt...

    1. Re:Zombies on the board by H8X55 · · Score: 1

      No, Adams' death.

    2. Re:Zombies on the board by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I know. But that stylistic mistake was begging to be pointed at. Really ;)

    3. Re:Zombies on the board by Draknor · · Score: 1

      I always suspected Disney had some "secret connections"....

      The real question, is who's gonna win the fight to be Lucifer's right-hand demon? Personally, I think Darl could take both Eisner & Gates :)

  4. LOTR by somethinghollow · · Score: 1

    With all the Lord of the Rings ads, I was a little confused about what I was looking at. Usually pictures about the story accompany the story...

  5. H2G2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't H2G2 "The Restaurant at the End of the Universe"?

    Or did the author mean H2G?

    Or not...? If not.. what the fuck is the H2G2 part for?

    1. Re:H2G2? by tabacco · · Score: 5, Informative

      Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.

    2. Re:H2G2? by funny-jack · · Score: 1

      H2G2 = The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

      --
      You probably shouldn't click this.
    3. Re:H2G2? by strictnein · · Score: 1

      Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy.

      2 H's
      2 G's

      H2G2

    4. Re:H2G2? by vapspwi · · Score: 1

      _H_itch_H_iker's _G_uide to the _G_alaxy. See, two Hs and two Gs. Clever.

      JRjr

    5. Re:H2G2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I prefer:

      H1i1t1c1h1h1i1k1e1r1s1space1G1u1i1d1e1space1t1o1 sp ace1t1h1e1space1G1a1l1a1x1y1

    6. Re:H2G2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clever.

      Not really.

    7. Re:H2G2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the two G's are seperated by two T's....

      Shouldn't it be H2G2tt or H2Gt2G?

    8. Re:H2G2? by pleasetryanotherchoi · · Score: 1

      oh, dammit.

      "h1t(hh1k3r5 Gu1d3 2 t3h g414xy"

      Sorry, I couldn't help myself, and it's half-past ritalin, anyway.

    9. Re:H2G2? by hendersj · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, because it's HitchHiker's Guide to the Galaxy, or HHGG, which "reduces" to H2G2.

      See The BBC Website for a reference.

      --
      Insanity is a gradual process; don't rush it.
    10. Re:H2G2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's way gay...

    11. Re:H2G2? by markh100 · · Score: 1

      I agree that hg2g would be a better acronym. There is, however, a Hitchhiker's website (http://www.h2g2.com) that has been around for a few years.

  6. I think I'm going to have to read the book again by leadfoot · · Score: 1

    It's been close to 20 years since I read the book. I'll need to refresh my memory.

    --
    "We're gonna need a bigger boat"
  7. Eddie Izzard - Both Male and Female? by Filmwatcher888 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Would he have one head with makeup, and the other without? - Cake or Death, Little Red Cookbook!

    1. Re:Eddie Izzard - Both Male and Female? by pyros · · Score: 1

      He could finally add Presidential Transvestite to his list, already claiming Action and Executive. But, having two heads might also lump in the fucking wierdo transvestite category too.

    2. Re:Eddie Izzard - Both Male and Female? by Alkaiser · · Score: 1

      Let's just he doesn't trip while he's wearing high heels...otherwise he'd have to fucking kill himself.

      --
      Netjak.com independent reviews of domestic & import video ga
  8. I still think... by James+A.+E.+Joyce · · Score: 1

    ...it would've been better if they'd just kept the cast of the BBC television series we limeys made of it.

    --

    FloodMT: crapflood Movab
    1. Re:I still think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would have to agree.... having seen The BBC version, it was exactly as I pictured in my head when reading the books. I don't think I can see these folks in the roles.

    2. Re:I still think... by Sporkinum · · Score: 1

      I remember watching it with my fiance' in 1981. Been married to her since 1982.

      We enjoy our DVD of it. We also have a copy of the Radio play that I converted from cassette tape to MP3 format. Perfect for those long car trips.

      Only problem is the cast is all 24 years older now. A bit too old for the parts now. All except for Marvin and the Vogon captain I expect. Nothing like those cheesy BBC special effects, like Zaphod's extra head.

      --
      "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    3. Re:I still think... by TonyMillion · · Score: 1

      Thats because most of them did the voices to the radio show. which is where the books came from I believe.

  9. Elf by Dreadlord · · Score: 2, Funny

    Zooey Deschanel (Big Trouble, Elf)

    Wow, I didn't know that the elves started to do movies for Hollywood ;)

    --
    The IT section color scheme sucks.
  10. But it's Disney, so what do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A pan-dimensional Mickey?

  11. H2G2 by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 4, Informative

    For those who don't know ...

    HitchHikers Guide to the Galaxy

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/h2g2/guide/

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    1. Re:H2G2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the heads up

    2. Re:H2G2 by iminplaya · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thank god...I thought it was one of those new elements that some mad scientist invented.

      --
      What?
    3. Re:H2G2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had no clue what it was till I read the comments

    4. Re:H2G2 by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      I felt the need since I

      1) haven't read the book
      2) Had to think for a second about it
      3) Figure there would be less clueful people who couldn't figure it out on their own

      I also considered Posting AC, but thought, "I don't read AC comments (except yours, hmmm), a lot of others don't either", and risked it just to be a tad helpful.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    5. Re:H2G2 by CGP314 · · Score: 1

      If you don't know that, I'm note sure you should be on slashdot : )

      --
      In London? Need a Physics Tutor?

      American Weblog in London

    6. Re:H2G2 by MROD · · Score: 1

      Hmm.. this is a relatively recent abbreviation for the title. I've known it by the terms "HHGTTG" or just "The Guide" since the early 80's.

      I think it was coined as a useful abbreviation purely for the web site Douglas Adams set up with the help of Aunty Beeb.

      --

      Agrajag: "Oh no, not again!"
    7. Re:H2G2 by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      If you don't know that, I'm note sure you should be on slashdot : )

      Well sir, you certainly belong here.

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    8. Re:H2G2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thank you, I wasnt sure what it ment, everyone else seemed to pick up on it instantly

  12. On the studios... by brucmack · · Score: 5, Interesting

    But it's Disney, so what do you expect?

    Adams on this subject in The Salmon of Doubt:

    "The Hollywood process is like trying to grill a steak by having a succession of people coming into the room and breathing on it."

    1. Re:On the studios... by PhxBlue · · Score: 1

      "The Hollywood process is like trying to grill a steak by having a succession of people coming into the room and breathing on it."

      Right, but there's enough hot air in Hollywood that this technique actually works every now and again. :)

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
    2. Re:On the studios... by kfg · · Score: 1

      My favorite example of this is "To Have and Have Not." Simply stunning film often unjustly derided as a Casablanca knockoff when it's, in fact, superiour ( my opinion, yadda, yadda and that other word that I forget).

      Howard Hawks, Ernest Hemingway, William Faulkner.

      I helps if the number of breathers is a)small b)stick to their balliwick c) all know how to frickin' breath.

      KFG

  13. Someone explain to the non-Hitchhiker educated... by AvantLegion · · Score: 2, Interesting
    ... what the appeal behind Hitchhiker's Guide is, and where one should start if it sounds good to them (books? radio? Infocom games?)

    What was it that drew everyone to Hitchhiker's? Or did some people gain interest just from all of the different forms?

  14. Disney? Might be good .... by Xolotl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Disney did The Pirates of the Caribbean". If they do HHG with the same degree of style (and don't screw with it too much) it might be quite good.

    1. Re:Disney? Might be good .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pirates of the Carribean was terrible. The costumes, scenery, acting, etc was all fairly decent - but the plot was fucking ridiculous. A two year old with a shitty diaper could have written a better plot than that. Was anyone ever surprised or intrigued or entertained by any "plot twist" along the way?

      It was a BORING movie.

    2. Re:Disney? Might be good .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot.

    3. Re:Disney? Might be good .... by c.emmertfoster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The only reason that film was good was Johnny Depp.

      --
      We can neither love nor pity nor forgive. If you make a slip in handling us you die!
    4. Re:Disney? Might be good .... by tr0p · · Score: 1
      Was anyone ever surprised or intrigued or entertained by any "plot twist" along the way?

      Crapped my pants when the the captain's head turned into bacon at night

      --

      My only regret... is that I have... bonitis..

    5. Re:Disney? Might be good .... by evanbd · · Score: 1

      And? A good lead or lack thereof *frequently* makes or breaks a film. If Disney does as well as they did with Pirates, and the actors do as well, and the director, and things generally go right, it could be a very good movie.

    6. Re:Disney? Might be good .... by TheSync · · Score: 1

      Hey, Johnny Depp could be Zaphod!

      Ozzy Osbourne should play the "old, tired" Zaphod in a sequel.

    7. Re:Disney? Might be good .... by 74nova · · Score: 1

      i agree with grandparent, if they do it like they did pirates, it could be great. sounds like the cast is wacky enough to pull it off. im just not sure i can work as a movie. some things only work in a setting that can only be created in a book

      the more off-topic part:
      indeed. im a married, decidedly straight male and i think johnny depp is awesome. he and brad pitt(if only i could speak with the accent he had in snatch) have totally ruined my hatred of them that i developed in high school. see, all the girls loved them, so i had to hate them. then i saw some great movies they were in and had to love them too. how am i supposed to hate them when they are so cool? dang.

      --
      use your turn signal! you people act like it's divulging information to the enemy
    8. Re:Disney? Might be good .... by fenix+down · · Score: 1

      Isn't Johnny playing Lex Luthor in the Superman they're making? It feels like they have him making like 6 movies a year these days.

      Incidentally, I can't find where it was I saw that, but searching for "johnny depp lex luthor" gets you just about the funniest article I've ever seen. Apparently Superman, Johnny Depp, Alec Baldwin, and Larry Flynt are all communists now.

    9. Re:Disney? Might be good .... by ignoramous · · Score: 1

      Actually, the entire cast was good. And they wouldn't have picked that cast if they had wanted to make a typical Disney movie.

      --


      I had a dream that I was dreaming about recursion.
    10. Re:Disney? Might be good .... by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      On the plus side, H2G2 has a plot already. So excellent pliot + fairly decent acting, scenery and costumes = good possibility of a good movie?

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    11. Re:Disney? Might be good .... by jred · · Score: 1

      Thanks, saved me from having to post and point out there's already a plot to H2G2. Well, crap. Now I've posted anyway :)

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
    12. Re:Disney? Might be good .... by prozac79 · · Score: 1
      The only reason that film was good was Johnny Depp.

      Yeah, I know I hate it when a movie is good because an actor plays his role really well. Movies should be good because they have a lot of explosions, and crashes, and people saying naughty words. But at least we both agree that the movie was good.

      --
      "Oh dear, she's stuck in an infinite loop and he's an idiot" -Prof. Farnsworth (Futurama)
    13. Re:Disney? Might be good .... by Alpha+State · · Score: 1

      Except that H2G2 is not action, it's a subtle comedic satire, and the chances of movie-makers understanding it, let alone wanting to make such a movie is pretty slim. I can't think of any recent american-made comedy movie which isn't based on slapstick and obscenity (not that there's anything wrong with slapstick and obscenity).

    14. Re:Disney? Might be good .... by dilweed · · Score: 1

      Of course, because it's Disney we know we'll get 3 sequels, all direct-to-video.

    15. Re:Disney? Might be good .... by fermion · · Score: 1
      I have not seen this movie yet, but have heard it is very good. However, I think this movie is an exception not a rule. To begin with, Depp is phenomenal. His presence and skill can turn any movie into a wonderful experience.

      That said, I do not see this movie as comparable to H2G2. The later has traditionally been, in all mediums, about words, emotions, and relationships. I believe the former was an action film with much CG. Too much action of CG will ruin H2G2. It would be like assumed Lucas could make a good period film.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    16. Re:Disney? Might be good .... by Nebrie · · Score: 1

      And this is why studios will often shell out $10 million for one actor then stick us with the bill. They're often worth it.

    17. Re:Disney? Might be good .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even funnier; the sponsered links on the right include links too..shops where you can buy a Che T-Shirt.

    18. Re:Disney? Might be good .... by Rich+Klein · · Score: 1

      Well then, quit worrying; this film will have Mos Def!

      --
      -Rich
  15. H2G2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For those of us challenged by hip acronyms, someone care to expand on what "HT2G2" is?

  16. H2G2 a common abbreviation? by Dimensio · · Score: 2, Funny

    I admit that I'm not a fanatic like some, but I have never heard that particular string used as a short way to refer to the Hitchiker's Guide series. I've seen HHGttG once or twice, but usually I just see the whole thing written out.

    It took me a moment to figure out the meaning of the headline. I had to actually read some of the additional commentary. If I had to actually read some of the commentary before posting on all articles, how could I shoot off an ill-informed comment that so blatantly exposes my ignorance?

    1. Re:H2G2 a common abbreviation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Shoudn't it be H2GT2G?
      Or white not just write (since it's an article and not just random conversation) Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy - so people can see the article on slashdot and know wtf it's about immediately?

      Oh, wait.. it's only geeky if you do shit like "LOTR:ROTK" and shit...

    2. Re:H2G2 a common abbreviation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up please, I had trouble figuring out what the title meant too.

    3. Re:H2G2 a common abbreviation? by danboy · · Score: 3, Informative

      H2G2 is the name Adams used for the Hitchikers website (h2g2.com) now owned by the BBC. That was the first I heard of it, but I think it's pretty common now.

    4. Re:H2G2 a common abbreviation? by nathanh · · Score: 1
      I admit that I'm not a fanatic like some, but I have never heard that particular string used as a short way to refer to the Hitchiker's Guide series. I've seen HHGttG once or twice, but usually I just see the whole thing written out.

      So I'm guessing you've never been to h2g2.com.

      It's about as official as it gets.

    5. Re:H2G2 a common abbreviation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how could I shoot off an ill-informed comment that so blatantly exposes my ignorance?

      I assure you, your comment makes that clear enough already.

    6. Re:H2G2 a common abbreviation? by Filmwatcher888 · · Score: 0
      The real-world, online guide has always been referenced as H2G2. And, since most online geeks refer to it this way, it would be an appropriate for /.

      Zero-Peril Sunglasses, anyone?

    7. Re:H2G2 a common abbreviation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent down please, poster had trouble figuring out how to use Google and/or a browser.

    8. Re:H2G2 a common abbreviation? by KFK+-+Wildcat · · Score: 2, Informative

      The BBC (who sponsored the first radio versions) use it on their website.
      It's HHGG (HitchHiker's Guide to the Galaxy), only written like a condensed chemical formula.
      I admit it's not exactly an obvious acronym... I read the 2 as "to" myself the first time I saw it.

    9. Re:H2G2 a common abbreviation? by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      It's so common that the guy who wrote the thing used it for a certain related web site.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    10. Re:H2G2 a common abbreviation? by bad_fx · · Score: 1
    11. Re:H2G2 a common abbreviation? by Jonboy+X · · Score: 1

      Ooh, that brings up another question: Who the fsck is this "Lotter Rotke" guy, and why does anyone care when he's coming out? Shouldn't that be his own personal choice?

      For that matter, why the fsck does everyone on here misspell "fuck" as "fsck"? Did we all fail Vulgar English class in 3rd grade? I only spell it that way to fit in here...

      --

      "In a 32-bit world, you're a 2-bit user. You've got your own newsgroup, alt.total.loser." -Weird Al
    12. Re:H2G2 a common abbreviation? by mph · · Score: 1
      For that matter, why the fsck does everyone on here misspell "fuck" as "fsck"?
      Because it used to be funny. Perhaps as recently as 1987.
    13. Re:H2G2 a common abbreviation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      For that matter, why the fsck does everyone on here misspell "fuck" as "fsck"? Did we all fail Vulgar English class in 3rd grade? I only spell it that way to fit in here.


      It's the Linux program for checking and fixing up your hard disk after a crash. Sort of like fdisk on the PC.

    14. Re:H2G2 a common abbreviation? by BeerCat · · Score: 0

      It's probably more a British thing from a particular generation. For Example, the satirical show "That was the wee, that was", was commonly known as TW3. Whereas when I was at school when the radio series / books / TV series actually came out, everyone abbreviated it as "HHGttG". The h2g2 website came later, but I think that Adams was doing the same kind of compression abbreviation used by TW3. Oh, 6 x 9 = 42, if you use base 13. Douglas Adams was quite impressed when one of my friends (also called Douglas, which also made DNA laugh on the book signing - "to Douglas from Douglas") pointed this out to him. I think that that reference was subsequently mentioned in the complete radio scripts book.

      --
      "She's furniture with a pulse"
    15. Re:H2G2 a common abbreviation? by Deraj+DeZine · · Score: 1

      fsck is the filesystem checker under UNIX. So if you fsck your hard drive, you need to fsck your file system.

      --
      True story.
    16. Re:H2G2 a common abbreviation? by Dimensio · · Score: 1

      So if you fsck your hard drive, you need to fsck your file system.

      True. Otherwise your data might get fscked.

      There, now the joke is beyond stale.

    17. Re:H2G2 a common abbreviation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the Linux program for checking and fixing up your hard disk after a crash. Sort of like fdisk on the PC.

      Erm... I think you mean chkdsk or scandisk. fdisk in DOS is a partition manager, just like fdisk in Linux.

    18. Re:H2G2 a common abbreviation? by Jonboy+X · · Score: 1

      Okay, just for the record, I am typing this post from a Linux box, and am fully aware what fsck is. Geez, apparently some of us also failed "Into to Humor and Sarcasm" in 6th grade...

      --

      "In a 32-bit world, you're a 2-bit user. You've got your own newsgroup, alt.total.loser." -Weird Al
    19. Re:H2G2 a common abbreviation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe that's how he fixes his hard disk :o)

  17. they forgot the most important part!! by xao+gypsie · · Score: 5, Funny

    ....what company will be supplying the towel???

    --


    xao
    http://TheHillforum.hopto.org
    1. Re:they forgot the most important part!! by mog007 · · Score: 0

      You seem tense... so please...

      DON'T PANIC!

    2. Re:they forgot the most important part!! by Mark+Hood · · Score: 1

      Marks and Spencers.

      I forget where exactly in the book(s) it is mentioned, but certainly Ford's towel came from the Oxford Street branch.

      And of course, there really was a promotional towel tie-in.... once. Oddly it's not on eBay :)

      Mark

      --
      Liked this comment? Why not buy me something nice
  18. HitchHiker's Guide to the Galaxy by James+A.+E.+Joyce · · Score: 1

    H2G2 == HHGG == HitchHiker's Guide to the Galaxy.

    HTH.

    --

    FloodMT: crapflood Movab
  19. What? by spectasaurus · · Score: 1

    Should I take H2G2 to translate to Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy? If so, say so. Not all of us are fluent in gibberishspeak.

    1. Re:What? by fuctape · · Score: 1

      The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy --> HitchHiker's Guide Galaxy --> HHGG --> H2G2

    2. Re:What? by Attilla_The_Pun · · Score: 1

      THANK YOU! Gawd, I get so tired of having to decipher the acronyms abut here tis assumed that everyone knows.

      --
      ...Somewhere, there is a chile you cannot eat." --Daniel Pinkwater in A Hot Time in Na
  20. you know... by musikit · · Score: 1

    having never read H2G2 i got to say now i whole lot more OSS and freeware product names make sense. until i read comments and what H2G2 ment i was truely baffled about what hollywood had to do with my favorite chat client.

    1. Re:you know... by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1

      having never read H2G2 i got to say now i whole lot more OSS and freeware product names make sense.

      oh my god. what? come again?

    2. Re:you know... by Swarfega · · Score: 1
  21. This doesn't match at all! by synth7 · · Score: 2, Funny

    When I read the story, Arthur was black and Ford was chinese. How dare they change the characters all around!

    (And what's with them removing the Dutch accent that all the Orcs had in LotR? Everyone knows that's how they talked!)

  22. I've got low hopes by KrispyKringle · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Somehow, things that were anti-establishment, outlandish, and unique seem to lose that anti-establishment fun when they're reproduced by a major motion picture studio.

    It always seems like they spend less time poking fun at things like how major motion picture studios do product placement and regurgitate the same old shit and spend more time doing product placement and regurgitating the same old shit.

    But I don't know. Maybe I'm just being cynical. After all, it's Disney! The people who brought us Brother Bear and, uh...yeah, Brother Bear!

    1. Re:I've got low hopes by synth7 · · Score: 1

      Well, in addition to Brother Bear they brought us Country Bears .

      Methinks there's a Disney VP that has a thing for furries or something.

    2. Re:I've got low hopes by evilned · · Score: 1

      Man the ads really pissed me off from that movie. Mainly at Dave Thomas and RIck Moranis for bastardizing their great McKenzie Brothers act for a low rate disney cartoon.

      --

      "My head hurts, My feet stink, and I dont love Jesus." -Jimmy Buffett

  23. Re:sounds good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This sounds good


    We need an ultimate movie that sounds good... Let's see, "What's yellow and dangerous?" HHGtTG. Nahhhh.

  24. Original Radio Series by tljohnsn · · Score: 0

    For me the radio plays will always be the highlight, though, with the books in second place. The animations on the TV series were *wonderful* but everything else looked wrong. Trillian is a sight classier than that, for a start (she's an astrophysicist ffs, not an airhead Essex blonde). Ford and Arthur looked nothing like they did in my head. And Zaphod... spare us. And as someone else said, Marvin doesn't really look like *that* does he?!

    1. Re:Original Radio Series by grolaw · · Score: 1

      Dead on. Therre is no better H2G2 than the original BBC radio production. I like my kind of casting and my kind of character imagery and then somebody comes around and makes a mess of my kind of overdraft...

      I went from my tapes (recorded off of NPR) to the CD's to my ripped copy on my iPod and pBook.

      Slarty Bartfast and the fjords are a perfect answer to "let me jack into your iPod" requests!

  25. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe I'm reading it wrong but did this slashdot article say Mos Def is playing Ford?

    Maybe I'm retarded but isn't Ford white? I'm not racist but i cant see a black person playing ford.. am i just confused?

    Did I read the book wrong and hes actually black?

    1. Re:Huh? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Whoa. The book doesn't say what colour he is, but he's from another goddamn galaxy. Be glad the actor isn't teal or something, or with a second head sewn onto his shoulder like the LAST H2G2...

      I for one am PUMPED to see what the mighty Mos Def can do for this film. He's an incredibly talented rhymer with a very distinct vocal style. His flow will match well with Davis' dialog. I'm already imagining him dropping great lines like "Muscle relaxant. You'll need it for hyperspace, it's unpleasantly like being drunk." "What's wrong with being drunk" "Ask a glass of water."

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    2. Re:Huh? by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Can you quote from the book where he's described as a white british man?

      Hes an alien from space.

      Besides, do you see a theme here? They cast a bunch of B-List nobodies.

      Know why?

      Noone cares if they cast Mayor McCheese in some stupid nerd movie that wont make a plug nickel since noone but a handful of geeks are interested in seeing it.

      And thats simply the truth of it.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:Huh? by SirSlud · · Score: 1

      I'm a HUGE Mos Def guy, and to be fair, he did start in theatre and move to music, now making his way back again .. but .. to me he lacks that perpetual 'inside wink' look on his face that Dent had from the BBC miniseries.

      And I know that talking about the TV miniserious is a good way to start a religious war, but damnit, I LIKED the casting from it. Everybody looked the roles (cept MAYBE Trillian) .. and these something about Douglas Adams' tone that makes it not only suitable in low budget effects, but even at home in low budget effects.

      I think Disney will fuck it up. They have a lousy track record of adapting franchises, and Douglas Adams' style and tone is horrendously easy to misconvey.

      Movies like this, which is a wet dream for set designers and effects guys, often end up being more about how well they captured a seamless, high polished look (Cat in the Hat) than how well they captured the message and tone of the source material .. (uh .. Cat in the Hat.)

      No wonder Disney only seems to get around to these things after the original author dies. Adams was horribly fussy about how his projects were realized, as was Dr. Zuess; it takes an opportunistic holder of their estate and properties to ignore Disney's track record and pimp out hallowed originals.

      PS. Mos Def, Gift to Gab, and J-Live are the most talented and erudite MCs in the business right now IMHO. I think Louis Logic, despite a lack of cerebral material, is looking more and more like the next great punchline rapper tho, and his flow is just effortless beyond description.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    4. Re:Huh? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Mos Def, Gift to Gab, and J-Live are the most talented and erudite MCs in the business right now

      You get no complaints here, but I think I'd add Aesop Rock, Slug (from Atmosphere), Mr. Lif and MF Doom to your list. They're all really pushing the boundaries of MCing while keeping true to the roots. Actually, these guys all put out records last year, and along with J-Live's last EP, they form my top 5 new records of 2003. I wasn't even into hip-hop...but last year was SHIT for rock. It's good to see somebody inventing and creating when bands like Jet are just spitting up reiterations of their influences...

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    5. Re:Huh? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Whoa. The book doesn't say what colour he is, but he's from another goddamn galaxy.

      He's from somewhere in the vicinity on Betlegeuse...not sure if that's in our galaxy.

      I don't remember the exact description, don't have the books handy, but he looked like someone who could expect to blend in in england. Hence, he looks british: White, goofy looking.

      He is also shown in the TV series, so basing it all on the books is absurd since there already was an accurate representation of the character that was established while the author was alive and in control.

      The reason why he's cast black is because its a movie made in the US, the land of tokenism. In the US, you NEED a black guy in your movie, or else you're racist. Its lame, its stupid, its counter productive, but that's how it is. Lando was cast black because people were up in arms about how racist Star Wars was because there were no blak people innit...etc.

      Personally, the post-mortem rewrite scares me, the black guy I don't care about. I've never seen him in anything, all I know is that there is no way he'll be as good a Ford as the actor that played him in the TV series. He might be close, but he won't be better.

      I'll go see the movie, and I'll try to lower my expectations as low as possible so that I can only be pleasantly surprised. Here's hoping.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    6. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Betelgeuse is in our galaxy. If only that were the most ignorant part of your posting. BTW, have you ever been to England? They have black people there too, you know.

    7. Re:Huh? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Quite a few black people, actually. Indians, Europeans, Asians, and people of the Middle East as well. England has a fair trade in immigrants -- you didn't think they only came here, did you?

      http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?id=2 99

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    8. Re:Huh? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      England has a fair trade in immigrants -- you didn't think they only came here, did you?


      His description would have included elements of notes such as these. If his race was unmentioned it was because if was not something you would notice about him, ie: its the same as everyone else, hence mention it would be redundant.

      And it does have lots of immigrants...some of them even come from as far as the vicinity of Betlegeuse!

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    9. Re:Huh? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      BTW, have you ever been to England? They have black people there too, you know.


      No, and I know you pompous jerk.

      Have you seen the HHGG tv show? How many black guys did you see hanging around Arthur's house? In the pub? In the street while the Vogon fleet was hovering the way bricks don't? How about in the diner where a woman has an epiphany right before the destructor fleet goes in acion?

      Are you saying that DNA was such an incompetant hack writer that he would omit to include in a character's description something as insconpicuous as that?

      Look, I don't care what colour Ford is, its not what's important about him, his personality is. But I do care about faithfullness to the book being adapted by a movie, and abut idiots implying incompetance from Adams.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    10. Re:Huh? by lowe0 · · Score: 1

      Hey, it worked in Blazing Saddles...

      Actually, in the Illustrated H2G2, Ford is white (though I believe Zaphod was black.)

    11. Re:Huh? by bonch · · Score: 1

      The book doesn't say what colour he is

      But in the radio series and BBC TV series, he was played by a white English guy.

      I can't help thinking it's a PC thing.

    12. Re:Huh? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1
      So because in the past he was played by a white guy, there's no way he can be played by a black guy now?

      Three years ago, Marvel began retelling the story of some of their superheroes in a more modern fashion. They made Nick Fury, the eye patched, cigar smoking leader of SHIELD, into a Samuel Jackson lookalike. And it was awesome...it has given the character an intriguing direction that he never had as a white bread GI Joe type.

      Tokenism is tokenism when the character is preeminantly racial and mostly tacked on. Making a character who's integral to the story a black guy, when there's no mention of his race, that's just a casting decision.

      I think fans are going to love Mos Def as Ford Prefect, and above all else I think Douglas Adams would himself have liked the casting choice. Putting an actor who's not strictly comedic nor overtly dramatic in the role of the cool straight man of the series (Zaphod being the insane, egomaniacal Kramer type and Arthur Dent being the insecure Neurotic type) is a brilliant casting decision. Choosing an actor who has the vocal ability to pull off complex, flowing British dialog and make it understandable is even better. The fact that he's a black guy is, well, not irrelevant, but not as important as the man's other credentials.

      I'll be more worried if they start putting them in latex jumpsuits and stalking Vogons in Frog Star Fighters across the galaxy in a sexy aluminum Heart of Gold...
      Ford: Hey poetry boy. Don't panic! [the Vogon fleet explodes. One of those dumb circular explosion rings expands towards the camera...]
      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
  26. So Long, and Thanks... by ferralis · · Score: 1

    I just hope they don't continue through all the sequels, no matter how well received the movie is. I mrean, really... How long 'till Pratchet gets the same treatment? I honestly hope they don't get around to him posthumously.

    --
    Any generalization is a stupid one.
  27. Um ... ok. by Ra5pu7in · · Score: 1

    I think I preferred the casting for LOTR. Martin Freeman looks like a good pick for Arthur, but the actors chosen for Ford and Trillian just do not fit my mental image.

    --
    I was taking one day at a time, but then several days got together and ambushed me. (from a Rhymes with Orange comic)
    1. Re:Um ... ok. by Jooly+Rodney · · Score: 1

      Have you seen the actors for the BBC miniseries? Have you seen BBC Zaphod / his second head? The BBC Vogons? This casting will definitely be an improvement.

      Man, they were all straight out of the Big Book of British Character Actors...

    2. Re:Um ... ok. by johnjay · · Score: 1

      I think Zooey's a great pick for Trillian. I've only seen her in small roles, but she's been really subversively funny in them (e.g. her part as a cashier in The Good Girl). Trillian's a bit part in the books, so it doesn't matter a whole lot who plays her, but Zooey is an excellent pick. Pretty enough to make poor Arthur Dent to fall for her hook line and sinker, too.

      Haven't seen, or don't remember seeing, Mos Def so I can't say anything about him.

    3. Re:Um ... ok. by dilweed · · Score: 1

      Zooey Deschanel is great. I *loved* her in "The New Guy".

      Mos Def was in "The Italian Job" and hosts HBO's "Def Poetry".

    4. Re:Um ... ok. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mos Def was in "The Italian Job"

      He was? Man, he looks a hell of a lot younger than he is! Michael Caine has aged badly compared to this guy, and as for Benny Hill..well, poor bastard.

      Oh you mean the shitty remake that tanked at the cinemas? Fuck that shit.

  28. Keaton as Zaphod? by Wraithlyn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Once upon a time I read that Micahel Keaton was their choice for Zaphod. I think he'd be great. :) This was years and years ago though.

    --
    "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    1. Re:Keaton as Zaphod? by makohund · · Score: 1

      That would be a cool choice. The last time this came up on Slashdot someone made a pretty good case for Bruce Campbell... and had me convinced it was a good idea. :)

    2. Re:Keaton as Zaphod? by EvilBuu · · Score: 1

      Perhaps years ago, I think he's a little past his prime to pull of a really hoopy frood like Zaphod. Taco's suggestion of Eddie Izzard is great, though it's likely another in a long line of false rumors/ruined hopes that he would play everything from Dr. Who to the next Bond (in heels!).

      --

      Green-voting, republican-registered, socialist-libertarian.
    3. Re:Keaton as Zaphod? by Wraithlyn · · Score: 1

      Well apparently Keaton was the late Mr. Adams' first choice. And really, he's going to have a second head, so they could probbaly make him look any age they want. ;)

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    4. Re:Keaton as Zaphod? by Stinking+Pig · · Score: 1

      yeah, he could be really good too. I suggested Tim Curry elsewhere, and I still think he'd be great.

      --
      "Nothing was broken, and it's been fixed." -- Jon Carroll
    5. Re:Keaton as Zaphod? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beeblebrox, Beeblebrox, Beeblebrox!

    6. Re:Keaton as Zaphod? by Wraithlyn · · Score: 1

      I also read a rumour that Disney wants Jim Carrey for Zaphod. I like Carrey, but don't think he'd be right for the role... he's certainly zany enough, but also a bit too wholesome. Zaphod is a devious, underhanded, slick-ass son of a bitch. :)

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    7. Re:Keaton as Zaphod? by Wraithlyn · · Score: 1

      Actually, now that you mention him, Tim Curry has my vote for the Vogon captain, under a few pounds of prosthetics of course. :D

      "Oh freddled gruntbuggly thy micturations are to me
      As plurdled gabbleblotchits on a lurgid bee."


      - Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    8. Re:Keaton as Zaphod? by pyros · · Score: 1

      I think a younger Campbell would have kicked ass. There were some video clips on the extras of the Fistfull of Boomstick game and he looked a lot older than would have every pictured him. That game rocked, wouldn't have been as good if it wasn't him doing the voice-overs though.

    9. Re:Keaton as Zaphod? by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      Richard Coyle! why not?

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    10. Re:Keaton as Zaphod? by McCarrum · · Score: 1

      OH YES!

      I'm sure Curry would just camp it out to the max, and eat up the role. Who do I call to make this happen ?!?!

      Seriously, I can see the image in my head right now, and I'm twitching ..

  29. This must be Thursday. by wildsurf · · Score: 5, Funny

    I never could get the hang of Thursdays.

    --
    Weeks of coding saves hours of planning.
    1. Re:This must be Thursday. by Darren+Winsper · · Score: 1

      Pure Genious :)

  30. Re:Someone explain to the non-Hitchhiker educated. by homb · · Score: 1

    Go get the book. The games and other media can wait.

  31. OMG SCO IS TEH SuXX0R LOLOLOLOL HAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny



    Darl is dumbo HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

  32. But it's Disney by frovingslosh · · Score: 1, Interesting
    But it's Disney, so what do you expect?

    Nothing. Loved the books. Enjoyed the BBC video, enjoyed the BBC radio play. Will not have it ruined by Disney and their idea of a rewrite. I'm so opposed to seeing this that I wouldn't even download it from the web.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:But it's Disney by bfree · · Score: 1

      I am extremely curious why the parent is deemed a troll! The article itself asks the very question, and the parent answers by saying that while they love all the previous h2g2 stuff, they are so appalled by the concept of Disney producing this that the won't watch it! I think my own opinions are pretty similar! I suspect this will be another one of those films I wont see until 3am in a friends house (the one who seems to have every film ever made) in 10 years time when they decide to put it on and I don't fall asleep (or leave).

      More serious and directly related to the article as a whole (and the presumably contentious issue of the parent), most people would not regard Disney as the best people to adapt a book to film, unless they are under 8 years old. Who here who has actually read the full trilogy (in five parts) actually thinks that anything which bears any resemblence to it will end up on screen? Disney's H2G2 could never have the dynamic of the books, it just wouldn't stack up to a bunch of marketeers! H2G2 has nothing which would appeal to a Disney audience without a complete rewrite. I expect it to be nothing more than a space adventure where an earth guy saves the world with a little help from their friends, all extraneous plot removed (the books are all random wandering, anything which seems like a plot is retrofitted in by the readers mind to make them think they have a clue whats going on) and lots of cute creatures (ah look at the mice, don't they have pretty singing voices).

      Let's face it, the odds on a Disney H2G2 actually being "the film" of H2G2 (as Peter Jacksons is now "the film" of LOTR) are at least 42:1! I'm sure we'll see another attempt further down the road, I just hope we don't have to wait until Disneys IP rights expire for this to happen because current trends would suggest that we would then never ever see anyone else get their hands on this material. I don't know what sort of a deal Disney has on this though so perhaps their is hope for a decent H2G2 maybe another decade or two down the road.

      Now if Terry Gilliam or someone was Directing then ... but imdb suggests the writer/director is Garth Jennings whose only credit is Title Designer on the Ali G TV show!

      --

      Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

    2. Re:But it's Disney by NotZed · · Score: 1
      Yeah its a real pity about Disney doing it. Well, Americans in general will have to screw it up, they always 'dumb down' anything they don't grok, so the quirky Englishman-edness of it all will end up being watered away to something barely recognisable, no doubt.

      Just see how they butchered Doctor Who for a perfect example of exactly the same issue.

      I was really disssapointed with the dubbing of Spirited Away too, Disney had to Americanise all that 'hard to understand foreign stuff' going on in it - but at least you could watch it with the subtitltes, which had much better dialogue.

      A pity, the story is so cool, but on the other hand it might be an example of a story that will never translate to film properly because of the imagination involved (not that anyone would recognise that anymore).

      --
      _ // `Thinking is an exercise to which all too few brains
      \\/ are accustomed' - First Lensman
    3. Re:But it's Disney by bonch · · Score: 1

      Even though Douglas Adams himself dismissed any criticism over the fact that Disney is involved? Did you read his posted quotes earlier in the threads? What rewrite--Douglas Adams was working the scripts up to his death.

      Ooh, but you're anti-establishment and "wouldn't download it from the web." You sure showed Disney and Douglas Adams.

  33. Mos Def by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mos Def's one of the most gifted lyricists out there, checkout his album Black on Both Sides.

    1. Re:Mos Def by Shant3030 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, he's tremendous

      --
      100% Insightful
  34. Obvious response by elsilver · · Score: 5, Funny
    It worries me when they say things like,...

    Don't Panic.

    E.

  35. Head going to explode! by onyxruby · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think my head shall explode. Have loved the books for longer than I can remember. I even adapted part of one book for a play in college - went over well. Have also been boycotting Disney for longer than I can remember. Refuse to give them any money since long before their whole DRM, MPAA etc behavior. Head going to explode! Have I been sent to hell, with this as my punishment?

    1. Re:Head going to explode! by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      Easy . . . sneak in.

      If you can't outwit the theater employees go and get a vesectomy.

      -Peter

    2. Re:Head going to explode! by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      No you haven't been sent to hell. You are just being reminded that mature people understand that in a complex world very few things or people are all evil or all good and thus blanket boycotts do very little good in the long run other than inconvienence yourself.

      Remember when the Southern Baptists said they were going to boycott disney? Disney didn't suffer any financial penalties because not enough people stuck with the boycott.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    3. Re:Head going to explode! by Rysc · · Score: 1

      This is what evil, illegal, soul-destroying online movie piracy is for.

      Just download it and be both guilt free and able to rewatch without the trouble of a return to the theater.

      Unless you feel squeamish about movie piracy or something silly like that.

      --
      I want my Cowboyneal
  36. explain your article words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It worries me when they say things like, "Adams adapted his own novel for the screen. After his death, Karey Kirkpatrick came aboard for a rewrite." But it's Disney, so what do you expect? Shooting begins in April."

    Why does it worry you when people say things like "Adams adapted his own novel for the screen. After his death, Karey Kirkpatrick came aboard for a rewrite."? This is a really confusing paragraph, d00d.

  37. Re:Someone explain to the non-Hitchhiker educated. by justforaday · · Score: 1

    simple answer:

    1) read the trilogy in order [starting with #1 and ending with #5]
    2) move on to tv shows, radio drama, infocom game, etc only after step 1 has been completed

    enjoy!

    --
    I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
  38. A black, American Ford? by EverStoned · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's gonna be a tough one to pull off..

    1. Re:A black, American Ford? by NaugaHunter · · Score: 5, Funny

      They'll probably change him from Ford Prefect to Ford Taurus, or even Ford F-150.

      --
      R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
    2. Re:A black, American Ford? by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      Martin Freeman is a black American? imdb says he was born in the UK. and I'll bet he's a whitey. or were you thinking of Morgan Freeman?

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    3. Re:A black, American Ford? by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      Crap, never mind, I can't line up names and roles.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    4. Re:A black, American Ford? by Xolotl · · Score: 1

      Very few people get that joke (that Ford Prefect was named after a car) - well done! Mod that up!

    5. Re:A black, American Ford? by redbaron7 · · Score: 1

      Any color as long as it is black!

    6. Re:A black, American Ford? by mcmonkey · · Score: 1
      And me with no mod points.

      Folks on the left side of the pond will think this is funny, but won't know why.

      Anyway, I think Mos Def is a great choice for Ford.

      I liked Zooey in Elf and Almost Famous, but she isn't an especially adventerous choice--kinda like they watched the tv series and said, let's get a Trillian like that

      Zaphod is a tough call. Eddie Izzard would be horrible. Half the time I cannot understand what he is saying. What I do understand, I don't find very entertaining.

      Queen Latifa is a better Zaphod than she is a Trillian. Jack Black could pull off a good Zaphod, maybe cgi in Kyle Gass as head #2.

      Though I don't see why they don't animate the whole thing and cast the simpsons...Homer as Arthur, Marge as Trillian, Bart and Lisa as Zaphod, Maggie as a mouse, Linguo as Marvin, Selma and Patty as Vogons, Prof Flick as Slartibartfast...I can see the burger king tie-ins now.

    7. Re:A black, American Ford? by rtv · · Score: 1

      Yeah it won't really be a surprise when he turns out to be not from Guilford, after all.

    8. Re:A black, American Ford? by MROD · · Score: 1

      Surely it depends upon who buys the product placement rights?

      "Ford Prefect" could become "Mercedes SLK" or "Jeep Grand Cheroke."

      --

      Agrajag: "Oh no, not again!"
    9. Re:A black, American Ford? by the-build-chicken · · Score: 1

      And doesn't the first description of Ford say ginger hair? Not to be racist, but you don't see many black people with naturally ginger hair. Well done on the casting there, way to do exactly not a good job.

    10. Re:A black, American Ford? by The+Night+Watchman · · Score: 1

      And doesn't the first description of Ford say ginger hair? Not to be racist, but you don't see many black people with naturally ginger hair. Well done on the casting there, way to do exactly not a good job.

      Well, I imagine you have to take certain acceptable liberties when casting and all. I'll gladly accept a black, non-ginger-haired Ford Prefect if they can actually get Trillian right this time. That was one of my biggest gripes about the BBC series. Not only did they get Trillian's look completely wrong, which is somewhat forgivable, they also completely rewrote her character to turn her into a mindless bimbo who repeated the computer.

      Besides, who says Mos Def can't simply dye his hair to match the character description? According to the story, he's masquerading as an out-of-work actor, and the resulting look would certainly be appropriate for such a person.

      I'm already afraid of what the movie is going to do overall to wreck my image of the book. I suppose we'll have to just sit back and wait.

      ---

      --
      "Every jumbled pile of person has a thinking part that wonders what the part that isn't thinking isn't thinking of"-TMBG
    11. Re:A black, American Ford? by adrianbaugh · · Score: 1

      That was my first impression (largely because of the Ford reader in the radio series, which still largely informs my perception of the characters)[0]. But given, in the book, he's done such a bad job of researching the ideal character for comfortable white, middle-class England that he's called himself after a motorcar, it's actually not that weird that he should be black, or American (especially given who puts out most EM broadcasting...)

      [0] A part I definitely thought was better done in the radio version of LoTR than in the movie was Bilbo - John le Mesurier had exactly the right vocal characteristics for Bilbo. It's a pity they won't be able to get him to play the Wise Old Bird in HHG either...

      --
      "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
      - JRR Tolkien.
    12. Re:A black, American Ford? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who grew up actually being able to quote the first book verbatim, and thinks that the original radio series is one of the cornerstones of Western culture, Mos Def looks a little odd to me too.

      However...

      One of the main comedic driving forces of the book always seemed, to me at least, to be the clash of American (perceived) brashness with British feelings of embarassment and propriety. Arthur is British (English), and is confused and baffled by the Universe he finds himself in when he leaves home. He is in his pajamas, no-one knows or cares who he is or where the hell he comes from, and he has no idea what is going on around him. He is, effectively an Englishman in New York.

      If the outside Universe is America, and Ford is an alien, it makes sense for him to be played by an American.

      Ford being an American thus makes quite a lot of sense. Him being black is neither here nor there to the character, even if he is asked to put on an English accent: being a black Briton is not unusual. Jokes about trying to fit into middle England and getting accent and skin colour wrong because of poor research are probably offensive, and I don't see it happening, somehow.

      Ford is Arthur's guide, he knows what the hell is going on. Arthur doesn't, and just wants a decent cup of tea.

      Don't we all.

      Chuck

    13. Re:A black, American Ford? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've not been to Guildford have you?

      Personally I'd have thought an Asian actor for the roll of Ford would have been a good fit. After all, he's supposed to be English..

    14. Re:A black, American Ford? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but with black skin and gingerish hair he would not look inconspicuous and be overlooked easily, which was his aim

  39. OT,but someone needs to make the [NO CARRIER] joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me just turn on my infinite probab}=20 ]} } } }&..}=3Dr}'}"}[NO CARRIER]

  40. Re:Someone explain to the non-Hitchhiker educated. by KrispyKringle · · Score: 1
    I'm only familiar with the books. But they're really good. Start with the first one (aptly titled The Hitchhiker's Guide to The Galaxy). Then read the second, third, fourth, and fifth books in the ``increasingly innacurately named Hitchhiker's Trilogy''. Assuming you enjoy the first one. Which you will.

    The reason the books are popular is because they are outlandish and enjoyable satire. Very comedic, very fun, very radical. A good read.

  41. Strange castng decisions? by tweder · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does the casting for Ford Prefect seem odd to anyone else? At least when I read the books, I NEVER pictured Ford Prefect to look like this.

    1. Re:Strange castng decisions? by Xolotl · · Score: 1

      Neither did I, but the idea has been growing on me since I heard of it. Ford is about his zany character amd style than looks. This might just work ...

    2. Re:Strange castng decisions? by mihalis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I thought that too, however since Ford is not even human (or at least not from Earth), insisting he be white and speak with a Britishaccent is a little limiting. After all, Ford grew up with Zaphod, right? Zaphod grew a third arm and second head on a whim, right?

    3. Re:Strange castng decisions? by CaseyB · · Score: 1

      In a strange convergence of sci-fi lookalikes, they chose an actor that is a dead ringer for The Cat from Red Dwarf. Not the same guy though.

    4. Re:Strange castng decisions? by Artichoke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      For me, given that it was a radio series first, I'll go with your first but not your second point.

      To expand a little. Yes Ford can be what ever colour you like, NAP. But Douglas Adams was a _very_ English writer, and if he wrote Ford with an English accent (witness accents on original BBC Radio4 series: mostly, but not entirely, English accents), I'd prefer it to stay that way.

      That said, without DNA to keep the director/movie corp in line, I'm re-jigging my expectations for the film.

      Disney doing subtle mixed with off-beat English humour <shudder>.

      --
      __
      Arse
    5. Re:Strange castng decisions? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Zaphod grew a third arm and second head on a whim, right?

      That's like getting a tatoo and a piercing for the galactics, no biggie.

      As for the black Ford, I don't like the change, but I don't really care, Ford's skin colour wasn't an important feature of the character. Since I'm sure Arthur Dent will now be a US citizen, Ford can be black. If nationalities are fickle, so can races.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    6. Re:Strange castng decisions? by wildsurf · · Score: 1

      After all, Ford grew up with Zaphod, right?

      Zaphod: Ford, this is Trillian. Hi. Trillian, this is my semi-cousin Ford who shares three of the same mothers as me. Hi. Trillian, is this sort of thing going to happen every time we use the Infinite Improbability Drive?
      Trillian: Very Probably, I'm afraid.
      Zaphod:Zaphod Beeblebrox, this is a very large drink. Hi.

      --
      Weeks of coding saves hours of planning.
    7. Re:Strange castng decisions? by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      Ha! I was thinking the same thing! And, now that I think about it, the cat would have made a decent Ford Prefect... hopefully this guy will too...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    8. Re:Strange castng decisions? by jmichaelg · · Score: 1
      Umm, about the only preconception that's warranted is the actors have British accents and that's a bit iffy. There are plenty of blacks in Britian so skin color shouldn't factor in casting the part.

      Whomever they cast for Zaphod, I just hope he's a good comedians and the screenplay is first rate. It'd be a shame to screw up Hitchhikers.

    9. Re:Strange castng decisions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should get Colin Salmon-Rule Britannia!!!

      Mike-an Englishman trapped in a Black American body

    10. Re:Strange castng decisions? by PollyJean · · Score: 1

      Does the casting for Ford Prefect seem odd to anyone else? At least when I read the books, I NEVER pictured Ford Prefect to look like this

      As a black woman who spent a large part of her childhood in England, who once had a English accent, and who grew up with the HHG books, I feel the need to say, DON'T PANIC! ;-)

      There are plenty of black English people (we exist in more places than just North America and Africa), so even though Ford isn't necessarily English, either way, the casting's not odd at all. Ford could very much look like Mos Def.

      --
      Think like a person of action, act like a person of thought. --H. Bergson
    11. Re:Strange castng decisions? by sandbenders · · Score: 1

      Mos Def has a style and presentation that is smooth, but a little out there- I think he'll be much better than most people expect. No, I wouldn't have pictured him for the role, but the more I think about it, the more I like it.

      --
      Eagles may fly, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.
    12. Re:Strange castng decisions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't think there are black people who speak the King's English -- you've never heard a British boxer talk. =)

    13. Re:Strange castng decisions? by bonch · · Score: 1

      Not only does the tone and speech of the books obviously suggest he's white, but the fact a white English guy played him in the radio and TV series should also give you a clue.

      It's just Disney changing things to appeal to Americans. "He's black AND American! That'll get suburbanites in the theater seats."

    14. Re:Strange castng decisions? by mooman · · Score: 1

      I'm not quite sure where the mental images came from, but for whatever reason, I have, from day one (about 20 years ago), pictured Ford Prefect looking like John Cleese and Arthur Dent looking like Terry Jones. Therefore I am completely unable to cope with their current casting choices... I think I shall go have (another) cup of tea.

      --
      In the Portland, Ore area and like card games? Check out: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/portlandgames/
    15. Re:Strange castng decisions? by Artichoke · · Score: 1

      It's currently the Queen's English (and idomatically usually referred to as such).

      Accents are colour blind. Most of our boxers, of whatever hue, definitely do not use the Monarch's English. Hey, most of 'em have enough trouble stringing any words togther of any description :)

      And I have you note that it's the accent I care about. Ford could be whatever variety of English you care to mention, we are a mongrel nation after all - pre-Celts (whoever they were), Celts, Romans (from many parts of that empire), Anglo-Saxon (et al. - whoever he was), Vikings, French, assorted slaves, Commonwealth immigrants and assorted others.

      But DNA wrote what he wrote in his inimitable style. I guess I'll have to live with ingenuity of casting, but I'd prefer integrity.

      --
      __
      Arse
  42. Re:Someone explain to the non-Hitchhiker educated. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Start with the books.

    While the radio episodes will probably get a good vote on /., the books are what most people are probably familiar with and generate the most discussion. Chock full of humour and insightful "observations".

  43. Re:Someone explain to the non-Hitchhiker educated. by Wraithlyn · · Score: 1

    You should start with that wholly remarkable book, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy". And get yourself a towel.

    --
    "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
  44. Re:Someone explain to the non-Hitchhiker educated. by IthnkImParanoid · · Score: 1

    My uncle bought me "The more than complete Hitchiker's Guide", which contained all four books and that fifth one no one really likes to talk about. The books are easily the funniest thing I've ever read.

    The Infocom game, IMO, is just about the most frustrating thing known to mankind, even for someone who's read the books many times.

    --
    It's nothing but crumpled porno and Ayn Rand.
  45. H2G2? by llZENll · · Score: 1

    oh ok Hitchhikers guide blah blah, ok taco, not everyone is as big a geek as you, spell this shit out please

  46. zaphod actor by Stinking+Pig · · Score: 3, Insightful

    really, really ought to be Tim Curry.

    --
    "Nothing was broken, and it's been fixed." -- Jon Carroll
    1. Re:zaphod actor by Lerxst+Pratt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think Tim Curry would make a better Ford Prefect. Imagine Time Curry's smile for a moment, then read this text from H2G2 that describes Ford:

      "Perhaps it was that he smiled slightly too broadly and gave people the unnerving impression that he was about to go for their neck."

      Well?!?

    2. Re:zaphod actor by LowTolerance · · Score: 1

      That would be perfect...plus he's got a wicked British accent. Mos Def is from Brooklyn. And I think the actor who plays Mr. Bean would be an awesome Arthur.

    3. Re:zaphod actor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rowan Atkinson; and you're right but for the wrong reason. Mr. Bean = piddly little farter. Black Adder on the other hand is a must-see for anything evolved beyond plankton.

    4. Re:zaphod actor by MROD · · Score: 1

      Actually, more in keeping with the original, an over egotistical, over the top American radio DJ would fit the bill.

      --

      Agrajag: "Oh no, not again!"
    5. Re:zaphod actor by Requiem · · Score: 1

      I agree, but only because I've seen him play a more hopeless Englishman in the Black Adder series. Take a look at it sometime. It's very good, and way, way funnier than Mr. Bean.

    6. Re:zaphod actor by LowTolerance · · Score: 1

      Ah yes...I couldn't remember his name, is all. I did not mean to imply that I wanted Mr. Bean to be reincarnated as Arthur Dent. I just meant that his physical comedy seems well suited for the role.

    7. Re:zaphod actor by sxe_p06 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, I always pictured Ozzy Osborne as Zaphod. I mean, come on... THIS is Zaphod. He's got the glasses, the personality, and the accent.

      --
      -- p06 "On religious wars: They're essentially wars over whoo's imaginary friend is better"
    8. Re:zaphod actor by crywolf · · Score: 1

      Howard Stern?

      --
      CAUTION: Product may be hot after heating
    9. Re:zaphod actor by Gleng · · Score: 1

      Good lord!

      I've been wondering who would make a good Zaphod for ages. Ozzy would be absolutely spot on!

      --
      "Proudly Posting Without Reading The Article"
    10. Re:zaphod actor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i agree. And richard e. grant would make a great zaphod. Ever seen Withnail & I or How to Get Ahead in Advertising? He'd play the part excellently.

    11. Re:zaphod actor by ThaReetLad · · Score: 1

      Howard Stern as Zaphod!!!! Yes!!!

      --
      You can't win Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    12. Re:zaphod actor by EctoErgoEgo · · Score: 1

      I have to agree with crywolf. The first time I saw Howard Stern, I knew that I was looking at the true incarnation of Zaphod. Of course, he only had the two arms and the one head and called himself "Howard"...

  47. Re:Someone explain to the non-Hitchhiker educated. by fireduck · · Score: 1

    Start with the books. i was first introduced to it/them through the Infocom game sometime in elementary school. I didn't quite understand the jokes or what was going on (why do i have to put the towel over my head again?) until I had read the book. Which I think I read concurrently with the game after I couldn't get past the introduction of the game. Haven't ever listened to the radio play...

    One can play the game online here.

  48. Wry look at "Life, The Universe, and Everything" by Ra5pu7in · · Score: 1

    What drew me to the Hitchhikers Guide series?

    Humor would have to be number one.
    Unpredictability would be second.

    Adams takes the reader on many twists and turns to wind up where we least expect.

    My favorite aspect of the books is how a single event in one book can be later explained in another book from a wildly different perspective (e.g. a bowl of petunias thinking "not again" in one book is not explained until a later book).

    --
    I was taking one day at a time, but then several days got together and ambushed me. (from a Rhymes with Orange comic)
  49. At Least there's no Will Smith. by Dolemite_the_Wiz · · Score: 3, Funny

    The last thing Hollywood needs is another crappy adaptation of cool Sci-Fi media by Will Smith. Wild, Wild, Wild West and MIB were enough.

    Dolemite
    _________________________

    --
    Save the World! Use a Quote!
    1. Re:At Least there's no Will Smith. by PHoRD42 · · Score: 2, Funny
    2. Re:At Least there's no Will Smith. by macMaestro · · Score: 1

      He's too busy trashing Asimov: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0343818/

    3. Re:At Least there's no Will Smith. by the+gnat · · Score: 1

      I liked MIB, but what makes it fun is the interplay between Smith and Jones. The plot as a whole is pretty dorky, and so is Smith, but he works very well when played off against the straight man. (And I'll watch Tommy Lee almost anywhere.)

      It's too bad Wild, Wild West did not work despite a similar pairing. (And I think Kevin Kline is a better actor than Jones.)

    4. Re:At Least there's no Will Smith. by Bobulusman · · Score: 1

      Ah, crud.

      There's no way they'll get that right. It looks like an amalgamation of the various stories of "I, Robot", with some "Caves of Steel" thrown in for good measure.

      Still, Asimov's technique of having genuinely HELPFUL robots, as opposed to the thousands of crappy stories about killer robots will probably be lost.

      Other than the story about the robot with a partial first-law removal (Couldn't kill, but could, through inaction, allow humans to BE killed), which I suppose will play a key part in the movie.

      --
      Cogito ergo sum in Slashdot.
    5. Re:At Least there's no Will Smith. by samdu · · Score: 1

      Stay tuned for the Will Smith vehicle I, Robot. No joke.

  50. Disney is involved? by FFFish · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...that can't be good.

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  51. H2G2: It changes every time!!! by TheMonkeyDepartment · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Throughout the history of H2G2, Douglas Adams adapted and re-adapted his works to multiple media. Starting with a radio show, moving to books and TV, even a computer game -- with every adaptation, he fearlessly changed it around as he saw fit, to embrace the strengths of the medium. The computer game is not the same material as the book, which is totally different from the radio series, etc. etc.

    In other words, The Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy series is all about change. If the movie is 100% faithful to the books, I'll be very disappointed. I want them to switch it around a little bit, give us some of the stuff we love, but also some new stuff too.

    I want to see the wonderful spirit of H2G2 and the sense of humor of Douglas Adams accurately reflected in these movies. If that's done, I don't care if Ford is black, if Arthur Dent is Latino, if Trillian is played by Queen Latifah or if Fenchurch is played by Harvey Fierstein.

    1. Re:H2G2: It changes every time!!! by robbkidd · · Score: 1
      I don't care if [...] Fenchurch is played by Harvey Fierstein.

      *boggle*

    2. Re:H2G2: It changes every time!!! by UrgleHoth · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but Douglas Adams is dead, so Disney probably won't be able to get much useful feedback from him.
      And I question the quality of H2G2 after going through the Disneyfication(tm) process.

      --

      Dogma - "let's just say we'd like to avoid any empirical entanglements."
    3. Re:H2G2: It changes every time!!! by jellisky · · Score: 1

      Gotta agree with you there... ... but the statement "... Fenchurch is played by Harvey Fierstein." really got me. Out, out damned visions! Now you've given me my nightmares for the next couple years! ;)

      -Jellisky

    4. Re:H2G2: It changes every time!!! by TheMonkeyDepartment · · Score: 1

      Heh, the Harvey Fierstein thing was obviously a bit of hyperbole, but you seem to understand my drift. We've already seen H2G2 over and over again, in various permutations. I'm willing to give them extremely wide latitude to shake things up, as long as they are faithful to the original spirit and sense of humor.

    5. Re:H2G2: It changes every time!!! by ahem · · Score: 1
      or if Fenchurch is played by Harvey Fierstein

      oh please. you have to draw the line somewhere!

      --
      Not A Sig
    6. Re:H2G2: It changes every time!!! by jellisky · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh, I definitely understand your drift... it's just that now, every time I hit upon Fenchurch in the books, I will get the mental picture of Harvey Fierstein in my head. Eeeee... *laughs.*

      -Jellisky

    7. Re:H2G2: It changes every time!!! by MROD · · Score: 1

      I blame it on someone working out what the question to the ultimate answer is...

      --

      Agrajag: "Oh no, not again!"
    8. Re:H2G2: It changes every time!!! by fermion · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It does change every time, but the essence is the same. The aggressive word play. The constant irreverence to the world and the norms. Jesus being refereed to as a guy nailed to a pole(or the like). Mice and dolphins ruling the world. The human character being the least important person in the galaxy. The earth is destroyed and no one cares.

      This kind of self depreciation is not American, and certainly not hollywood. If Arthur suddenly becomes a noble person, or there is grief over the loss of the planet, or, god forbid, it becomes Arthur's duty to redeem Ford and Zaphod, or even worse he gets Trillian, then the whole things falls apart.

      If this was mirimax, I might be more hopeful. But it is disney. Disney is all about the conventional status quo. It is why they have to have Pixar do their animation, even though Disney was once the greatest animation studio in the world. It is why they might lose Pixar, unless Eisner crawls to Jobs on his hand and knees.

      I hope is does change. I have mentioned some changes I would like. But I don't want to see this movie as another example where the studio bought the rights only to use the familiar name to sell tickets, while ignoring the fundamentals of the story.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  52. "Hollywood" Re-Write of H2G2 Scares Me... by ausoleil · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So after the Lord of the Rings, comes another well-regarded piece of literature in the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. Hollywood did well by LOTR, let's hope "they" learned their lesson and will let a piece of classic writing stand on it's own and not try to stuff the story into a 2-hour formula.

    My great fear of this is that the wit, sarcasm and anti-religious rage will be written out and instead, we'll get...Spy Kids in Space. The anti-religious part will be the first to go, otherwise Pat Robertson will be ranting and railing on Fox News about a horrible, blasephemous film coming from that esteemed home of children's entertainment, Disney. But it's a part of 'The Guide' and should stay in. Otherwise, it becomes...something else.

    On the other hand, I suppose Disney should be given a little benefit of the doubt, after all, Pirates of the Caribbean was a highly entertaining film.

    It will interesting to see what happens with this. I was hoping secretly Peter Jackson would handle the director's chair, given the respect he gave LOTR as literature. To me, Hitchhiker's Guide is a classic and should not be "messed with."

    1. Re:"Hollywood" Re-Write of H2G2 Scares Me... by CaseyB · · Score: 1
      Hollywood did well by LOTR

      The flaw in your reasoning is the attempt to stuff Wingnut (Peter Jackson's production company) and Disney into the same category, as if they share anything at all in common.

      Disney will fuck up Hitchhiker's. It's not even a question.

    2. Re:"Hollywood" Re-Write of H2G2 Scares Me... by eunos94 · · Score: 1
      Spy Kids In Space! Brilliant! The idea's all mine!

      /me whiping out typewriter to write screenplay

    3. Re:"Hollywood" Re-Write of H2G2 Scares Me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The anti-religious part will be the first to go . . . But it's a part of 'The Guide' and should stay in.

      Anti-religious part?

      It's been too long since I read the books, but I don't remember anything particularly anti-religious in them. The impression I always get of DA is that he regarded religion as rather silly, and enjoyed poking fun at it, not that he hated it.

      Can you provide references to the parts you have in mind? I'd be interested to see what it is you've noticed that is causing your concept of the book to be so different from mine.

    4. Re:"Hollywood" Re-Write of H2G2 Scares Me... by BCoates · · Score: 1

      I don't remember any anti-religious rage, but Pat Robertson (and most of his ilk) don't like Disney at all, calling for boycotts of their products and what-not.

    5. Re:"Hollywood" Re-Write of H2G2 Scares Me... by nikster · · Score: 1

      Pirates was Johnny Depp being allowed to do whatever he wanted to (==simply brilliant). Cut him out and you get a piece-of-crap typical-disney BS "family" movie. Johnny Depp alone made this film good.

      As for H2G2 - do not expect anything. In fact, a good preparation would be to watch all recent Disney films (sans Pixar). Expect Free Willy 2 in space. The problem with Disney is at the very top and as long as that doesn't change, the outcome won't change.

    6. Re:"Hollywood" Re-Write of H2G2 Scares Me... by Xenothaulus · · Score: 1

      "I was hoping secretly Peter Jackson would handle the director's chair, given the respect he gave LOTR as literature."

      Respect? Maybe in FotR, but he completely butchered the rest. Faramir? The "army of the dead?" NO SCOURGE? What the nuts.
  53. Not that strange... by toupsie · · Score: 1

    It's not strange, just imagine Chicken George in Roots being played by Jim Carrey. It makes perfect sense. You are just being racist with you anglo-centric mind.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    1. Re:Not that strange... by tweder · · Score: 1

      I take offense to your remark. I'm not the least bit racist. Let's face it, the way Douglas Adams wrote that character, I pictured a white english guy.

      Mebbe the old BBC version where Zaphod has a paper mache head can be to blame for this.

    2. Re:Not that strange... by the+gnat · · Score: 3, Informative

      Let's face it, the way Douglas Adams wrote that character, I pictured a white english guy.

      I didn't. I pictured Arthur as a white English guy, and Ford as a really irritating Southern California hipster, race unimportant. Like some obnoxious American tourist who barges into an English pub thinking he's the shit and talking too loud. (I'm an American, by the way.) I think body language and style are far more important here than race.

    3. Re:Not that strange... by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Ford as a really irritating Southern California hipster, race unimportant. Like some obnoxious American tourist

      Oh man! I had never even thought of that! His character makes so much sense as a tourist! Damn! Thanks dude! : )

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    4. Re:Not that strange... by toupsie · · Score: 1
      I take offense to your remark. I'm not the least bit racist.

      Except when it comes to having an Black man playing the role of Ford Prefect. Jeez, can't Blacks come from outer space like white folk? I thought we got past this with Uhura in TOS.

      --
      Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    5. Re:Not that strange... by metamatic · · Score: 1

      Plus Ford is vaguely sleazy and a bit of a scam artist; witness his getting drunk on That Ol' Janx Spirit.

      I think Steve Buscemi would make a perfect Ford Prefect, myself.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    6. Re:Not that strange... by bonch · · Score: 1

      Everyone else pictured a white English guy, since that's who played Ford in both the radio and TV series.

      This is just Disney being weird. "He's black, AND American!! That'll appeal to the dumb American demographic."

  54. Wow didn't know _he_ was Mos Def! by Serveert · · Score: 1

    Offtopic but, I really like Mos Def's music, I watched the Italian Job and had no idea that was him. Wow he is extremely talented, should be a good film.

    --
    2 years and no mod points. Join reddit. Because openness is good.
    1. Re:Wow didn't know _he_ was Mos Def! by Slack0ff · · Score: 1

      The music in the itailan job was very mild-techno sounding in many places and it did a great job of making the movie better without interfearing. It is one of the first movies I have seen where the score was setup so well i noticed it. Lets hope it carries over to hg.

      --
      Everyday You see me is the worst day of my life -Office Space
    2. Re:Wow didn't know _he_ was Mos Def! by Shant3030 · · Score: 1

      Mos Def is actually one of the few rappers who has a brain. His lyrics are intelligent and he delivers them with great flow.

      Check out the Blackstar album with Talib Kweli and his solo album Black on Both Sides.

      --
      100% Insightful
    3. Re:Wow didn't know _he_ was Mos Def! by Cap'nCrunk · · Score: 1

      Actually, Mos Def had a career in acting before he began making records. He just "fell into" hip hop at some point.

    4. Re:Wow didn't know _he_ was Mos Def! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well...that has nothing to do with anything. Ooookay.

  55. Re:Someone explain to the non-Hitchhiker educated. by MagicM · · Score: 1

    What was it that drew everyone to Hitchhiker's?

    I just wanted to be "in" on all the jokes about towels, fish, digital watches and, ofcourse, 42. Then I found out that the books are just ingeniously funny.

    Borrow the book from a library or a friend. Read the first chapter. If you chuckle at least once, you need to own it.

  56. Re:Someone explain to the non-Hitchhiker educated. by ukmountie · · Score: 1
    Growing up in Canada I found the television series most accessable as a lead in. It was a regular on PBS, and I'm sure it still must be.

    One I was hooked I read the books which I loved, followed by the radio play. Thing is I think they're all good for different reasons.

    The only worry I have, is having lived in England now for four years I still find bits I didn't get the first time around. So how is that going to translate to the typical Disney audience?

  57. But did they license... by DrewBeavis · · Score: 1

    Bable Fish from Altavista? Or are they gonna sue?

  58. Can someone explain please? by fuqqer · · Score: 1

    Why do they refer to it as H2G2 (Hitchhikers to Guide to)? I would think it should be written HG2G (Hitchhikers Guide To the Galaxy...

    I'm not taking a stab at Douglas Adams work or anything, but I am curious.

    (this sig intentionally left intentional)

    1. Re:Can someone explain please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The logic, of course, is:

      HitchHikers Guide to the Galaxy

      = H*2 + G*2
      = H2G2

      H2G2 is a lot snappier than HGTG and avoids placing emphasis on the word "to" which is relatively unimportant compared to the other words in the title.

    2. Re:Can someone explain please? by MrBlackBand · · Score: 1
      Actually, it should be H^2G^2 (H squared, G squared) because you have two 'H's and two 'G's ([H]itch[H]ikers [G]uide to the [G]alaxy).

      This next bit is not directed at you fuqqer:

      What's with all the people complaining that they don't know what it stands for? Were you upset that you couldn't find a spelling error in the submission and just had to nitpick about something? If you don't know what H2G2 stands for then perhaps you shouldn't be on a site that is "news for nerds".

      --
      "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it."
    3. Re:Can someone explain please? by KFK+-+Wildcat · · Score: 1

      HitchHiker's Guide to the Galaxy.
      HHGG.
      Ever taken chemistry?
      I agree it's not the standard Internet way of abbreviating, but it's original...

    4. Re:Can someone explain please? by ZapoAM · · Score: 4, Informative

      H2G2 is just a different way of saying HHGG, which in turn is an abbreviation of HHGttG. The 2s are used to state the amounts of the different letters, not in place of 'to'.

      You know you're lazy when an acronym is too much effort to type.

    5. Re:Can someone explain please? by SoSueMe · · Score: 1

      Think of H2O
      Hydrogen, Hydrogen, Oxygen.

    6. Re:Can someone explain please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The original Infocom adventure game was abbreviated as hitchhik, based on the executable: hitchhik.exe.

      What a game. It took me three years to finish. And this was is in the years before gamefaqs.com.

  59. Dear submitter... by jkmiecik · · Score: 1

    Not everyone knows what you mean by H2G2. I didn't and had to sift comments about homosexual African-Americans to find out. Let's try and not do that next time, okay?

    Joe Six-Pack

  60. Disney? by CausticWindow · · Score: 1

    That's just sad. Too bad he didn't sell the rights to a UK based production company.

    I'm expecting jokes explained to death and lots of 'Belgium' crap.

    --
    How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
  61. Wrong. by 2names · · Score: 1
    "no amount of CGI can beat the infinite movie screen of the imagination when fueled by a good book."

    I don't think so. Many people who are unable to visualize things in detail in their minds or have trouble following intricate writing such as Tolkein's can get a great deal of enjoyment from other media, e.g., movies.

    --
    "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
    1. Re:Wrong. by Lord+of+Ironhand · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Many people who are unable to visualize things in detail in their minds or have trouble following intricate writing such as Tolkein's can get a great deal of enjoyment from other media, e.g., movies.

      It makes me wonder though:
      - Do movies that leave little room for imagination affect the watcher's ability to visualise? (movies can leave room for imagination)
      - If so, should we actually worry about this, since it could simply be regarded as a form of evolution?

    2. Re:Wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The movie is just too damn short though. It could be good on film if it wasn't like 12 hours total. 60+ hours is really not unrealistic. How many hours has the sopranos got so far? Which is a better story?

  62. Start with the books by StringBlade · · Score: 2, Informative
    Unless you're attention span is so limited or work better audibly. The books have more detail than even the books on tape (sometimes) and you can read at your own pace.

    Additionally, the first three books are the best (Hithchiker's Guide to the Galaxy; Resturant at the end of the Universe; and Life, the Universe, and Everything -- I may have mixed up the order of the last two). So Long and Thanks For All the Fish and Mostly Harmless are ok, but get worse and worse. The trilogy probably would have been best if it had remained thus.

    The draw, at least to me, is the sci fi humor and use of language that Adams used, "Huge yellow spaceships that hung in the air exactly the way bricks don't," and "'Hyperspace travel is rather unpleasantly like being drunk,' said Ford. 'What's wrong with being drunk?' asked Arthur. 'Ask a glass of water,' responded Ford."

    --
    ...and that's the way the cookie crumbles.
    1. Re:Start with the books by Colonel+Panijk · · Score: 1

      So Long and Thanks For All the Fish and Mostly Harmless are [OK], but get worse and worse.

      So Long is my favorite of the "trilogy" -- a love story that's funny and touching. I really fell for Fenchurch. On the other hand, you could tell that Adams was pissed off about "having" to write Mostly Harmless to shut up fans clamoring for another HHGG book. You could tell he was relieved at putting an end to things.

  63. Obligatory Disney Joke by 2names · · Score: 5, Funny
    Mickey Mouse is in court and the Judge says, "I'm sorry, Mickey, but I can't grant you a divorce simply because you think your wife is a bit odd."

    Mickey says, "I didn't say she was odd, I said she was FUCKING GOOFY."

    --
    "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
  64. Re:Someone explain to the non-Hitchhiker educated. by rleibman · · Score: 2, Informative
    My Method,
    1. Read the first three books a few times over.
    2. Play the infocom game
    3. Read the first three books again
    4. Buy "The more than complete hitchhiker's guide", read it
    5. Read the radio scripts
    6. Read the whole series over again (repeat yearly)
    7. Read So Long and thanks for all the fish
    8. Yup, the whole series again
    9. Download from napster the radio show and listen to it
    10. Read Mostly Harmless
    11. Watch some chapters of the TV show
    12. Series
    13. Salmon of doubt
    Somewhere in there you should read The meaning of liff, the expanded meaning of liff, and of course the Dirk Gently books.
  65. So I guess by iminplaya · · Score: 5, Funny

    we're not going to boycott disney anytime soon, eh?

    --
    What?
  66. Re:I think I'm going to have to read the book agai by zoney_ie · · Score: 1

    It's been a while since I read the "trilogy", from the family library at home.

    I'll have to get my own copy of the books before they bring out edited, yukky cover, over-priced film merchandise versions of the books.

    --
    -- *~()____) This message will self-destruct in 5 seconds...
  67. HOLY PROMOTIONAL TIE-INs! by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 1

    LOL. Made by some foreign Dentrassi slave-wage laborer, no doubt.

    1. Re:HOLY PROMOTIONAL TIE-INs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slave-wage labourers? That suburb's really gone down since they all graduated from Dentrassi Junior High...

  68. Re:Someone explain to the non-Hitchhiker educated. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Infocom game where I first learned of H2G2... about twenty years ago.

  69. Oh, look, they're up in arms again. by Caiwyn · · Score: 1

    But it's Disney, so what do you expect?

    I expect to see a bunch of disestablishmentarian Slashdotters bitch and moan because they hear the word Disney and make unfounded assumptions. Come on, the company that made Lilo & Stitch can't be all that bad.

    Seriously, this is hardly bad news. Karey Kirkpatrick doesn't exactly have a horrible track record if you check IMDB. He scripted Tim Burton's "James and the Giant Peach," as well as "Chicken Run," both of which were required that he adapt an already-existing story from someone else's ideas into a screenplay. It can be reasonably safe to assume that he won't screw with Adams's vision.

    As for the casting, it might not be top-notch, but there's something to be said about the fact that these are all relatively-unknown actors and actresses who have proven themselves in low-profile but respectable venues. You might remember Zooey Deschanel from Almost Famous, and MosDef from The Italian Job. The guy playing Arthur is pretty much unknown in the states but has experience in England, and Stephen Moore is even reprising his role. How is any of this bad?

    I swear, for all the slavering fanboy rhetoric, nobody here seems to have learned anything from the book. The first rule is DON'T PANIC.

    Myself, I'll wait until I hear something concrete about the production before I decide to write it off.

  70. Disney. Gack. by chaoticset · · Score: 1
    Wonderful. I can now expect one of my childhood memories slaughtered for the Relentless Mouse Machine.


    If those with a serious interest in literary comedies had no reason to kill themselves before, they certainly do now.


    On the bright side, however, I hear there's going to be a Zaphod-themed drink at McD's, with a dual cup, one side shake, one side soda...!

    --

    -----------------------
    You are what you think.
  71. A Black Arthur Dent?! by thelizman · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...why not, it worked in blazing saddles...

    1. Re:A Black Arthur Dent?! by zoobot · · Score: 4, Funny

      There was a Black Arthur Dent in Blazing Saddles?

    2. Re:A Black Arthur Dent?! by Gothic_Walrus · · Score: 1

      Just to clarify...Ford is the one who will be black. It doesn't really matter what race the actor is as long as he can pull off the character. Let's hope he's able to...

      --
      Goo goo g'joob.
    3. Re:A Black Arthur Dent?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Bruce Willis as Zaphod, Eddie Griffin as Ford, Juillanne Moore as Trillian, and Alan Rickman as Arthur! ...and no, it's not "Die Hard in the Restuarant at the End of the Universe"!

      Mike

    4. Re:A Black Arthur Dent?! by thelizman · · Score: 1
      It doesn't really matter what race the actor is as long as he can pull off the character.


      Are you really that clueless?
  72. Re:Someone explain to the non-Hitchhiker educated. by haystor · · Score: 1

    Science Fiction version of Lewis Carroll's work, in space written for adults.

    It has the feel of the author telling the reading a fantastic story.

    Read the first 5 pages in a book store. It starts fast enough you should be able to tell by then.

    --
    t
  73. I don't see Hollywood succeeding in this... by 3flp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sorry, but they don't have the mentality to capture the subtle hilarity of the Hitchikers guide. It's like a industrial drill operator trying to do a brain microsurgery...

    I'd like to be surprised though.

    --

    "Argue with idiots, and you become an idiot." -- Paul Graham

  74. Why there's no Zaphod announced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much do you want to bet that it's because he's going to be a completely CGI character?

  75. Infinitely improbable... by Kaishaku255 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...that Tux will make an appearance as Ford Prefect turns into a penguin (the first movie) since he didn't even make the slashdot poll for favorite mascot!

    --

    Seppuku: Your solution to my problems!

  76. Dirk Gently! by jellisky · · Score: 1

    Read those too! Those are totally different, but, IMHO, better than the H2G2 trilogy in many ways. I re-read the Gently books more than the H2G2. They're just THAT good. The humor is just as witty in those, and the first chapter in "Long, Dark Tea-Time of the Soul" about the airport is, easily, one of the most perfectly written chapters Mr. Adams ever wrote.

    -Jellisky

  77. but then again... by Doktor+Memory · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Come on, the company that made Lilo & Stitch can't be all that bad.

    Yes, but the company that made Lilo & Stitch and then proceeded to fire everyone who'd worked on it just might be that bad.

    --

    News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters? Like hell.

    1. Re:but then again... by Caiwyn · · Score: 1

      Hm, good point. I can't deny their lack of business ethics, and their track record is less than stellar as of late, but they do put out good products on occasion. Remember, they're the ones doing U.S. distribution for most of Miyazaki's stuff these days.

      BTW, Doc, your sig rules.

  78. This news almost... by Gamoid · · Score: 0

    ...makes me want to reread the books so I can be a more informed troll and naysayer when it comes out. Then I remember that I HAVE reread the books. Bimonthly. For the past five years.

  79. Silly Hollywood Lawyers by JasonUCF · · Score: 1
    attorney Jason Sloane of Hansen, Jacobson, Teller, Hoberman, Newman, Warren, Sloane and Richman
    Oh come ON... 8 guys, none of whom can stand being second fiddle. Geeez..
  80. Re:Keaton as Zaphod? How about Mos Def as Ford??? by anactofgod · · Score: 1

    I'm still trying to wrap my brain around that one.

    Thinking back to "The Italian Job" remix, it could be interesting...

    ---anactofgod---

    --

    ---anactofgod---

    "Equal opportunity swindling - *that* is the true test of a sustainable democracy."
  81. ekoJ OCS diputS by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Funny

    "No word on who's playing Zaphod (but wouldn't Eddie Izzard be great?"

    I nominate Darl McBride, he's already two-faced!

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:ekoJ OCS diputS by iNetRunner · · Score: 1

      Frigging.. Not a guy I'd want to be the president of the galaxy.. *Shudder..*

      --
      Store with salt
  82. On the subject of a Hollywood rewrite.. by MROD · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, by-passes are out.. the American 13-18 male demographic don't know what they are.

    You can't have drinking to excess (even if it is with peanuts to help offset matter transfer and hyperspace) in a teenager film, so that's out.. It'll have to be Coca-Cola/Pepsi and Doritos instead.

    The mid-western 13-18 male demographic wont understand probability, so the infinite improbability drive is out. It must be the particle of the month, just like Star Trek.

    Satire isn't funny enough. Eddie the ship board computer will have to be smutty and/or throw custard pies. Marvin will be the cheery, slapstic C3PO look-alike.

    I'll just go and drink a Pan-Galactic Gargle Blaster (tm) (c)Zaphod Beeblebrox, (available at a seedy space ranger's bar near you) and drown my sorrows. (Oh, and that'll be canned as well!)

    --

    Agrajag: "Oh no, not again!"
    1. Re:On the subject of a Hollywood rewrite.. by trouser · · Score: 1

      I recall Douglas Adams joking that he'd decided against Ivan Reichman as director on a previous attempt to develop the film when Reichman complained that he had a problem with the answer to the ultimate question of life, the universe and everything. Apparently he felt '42' lacked a certain panache or something.

      Anyway, I'm curious to see how those turns out but I fear it will be a total disaster.

      --
      Now wash your hands.
    2. Re:On the subject of a Hollywood rewrite.. by bonch · · Score: 1

      Did you see the adaptation of LOTR?

      God, you people are acting like morons. When did this place suddenly become the Ain't-It-Cool-News talkbacks? I guarantee you'll go see the film, probably like it, and pretend you never even posted that. Does it even occur to you that it was Douglas Adams trying to get this project off the ground up until his death?

    3. Re:On the subject of a Hollywood rewrite.. by gorimp · · Score: 1

      I fear that with the absence of Douglas Adams, the results of the rewrites will be far more significant then the lack of 6 pints of bitter in the first 15 minutes of the movie.

      Adams has been floating the script around Hollywood for a very long time; The preface in the '93 Hardback (A Trilogy in Four Parts) has him suggesting that he started work on a screenplay shortly after finishing Life, The Universe And Everything (3rd book, '82), suggesting the 4th book (along with Mostly Harmless) could be a sequel (or give a clue where the movie will end in the book series -- the original TV series ended with the 3rd book after 2 hours). In '98 he commented "Disney is the studio which is making this movie, which is financing it, which will be distributing it. [...] The important issues as far as I'm concerned is - who are the individual people I'm working with? The director, the producer, the studio executive etc."

      Screenwriting credits go to Kary Kirkpatrick who's previous work includes Chicken Run and The Little Vampire. Directing credit go to Garth Jennings, an unknown who's stepping up from the music video scene (who's also listed as a screenwriter by IMDB). Art Direction comes from Frank Walsh (Tomb Raider: Cradle of Life). Spyglass Entertainment (The Sixth Sense; Shanghai Noon) is Disney's controller in this endevour.

      It seems to me that Disney is handing production over to a group which will create something which is pretty much guaranteed to at least break-even in the long run, even if it does lousy on innitial release. If the story is strong enough to survive the first movie they can hand sequels over to the trendy film makers to bleed the story dry.

      It would be unfortunate to see the move adaptation turned into a PG-13 practice vehicle for Hollywoods search for new production talent.

  83. Speaking of "Salmon of Doubt" by Jaycatt · · Score: 1

    I'd just like to mention that it's a very underrated book. I bought it (like most people, I suspect) for the Dirk Gently story chapters. I found, however, that the parts I most enjoyed were his essays and interviews. Douglas Adams is a great speaker and essayist, and has a lot of fascinating viewpoints of different areas of life (especially religion). It kind of reminded me of when I saw "An Evening With Kevin Smith". Smith's movies are pretty good (Clerks especially), but his public speaking and storytelling were just outstanding. I had a friend over watching it, and he had never seen a Smith movie (imagine that) but still enjoyed the talks immensely.

    --
    "Shared pain is lessened; shared joy is increased. Thus we refute entropy" - Spider Robinson
  84. Re:Someone explain to the non-Hitchhiker educated. by Jonas+the+Bold · · Score: 1

    RTFB

    --
    Everything seemed to be going so nice
    'till the end of all beings punched right through the ice
  85. That's just the problem, HE did. by Kjella · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Throughout the history of H2G2, Douglas Adams adapted and re-adapted his works to multiple media.

    And you can beat your ass that no matter what anyone else does, it'll be shot down in flames. Just look at all the things they had to change in LotR - if JRR Tolkien had been there and said "We need to do this to make it work on the screen" noone would have complained. But even the things that were absolutely necessary got flamed from here to the moon.

    Besides, I'd love to see a good movie version of it as it is, I have the TV series. I just hope they can keep it just as British as the original, not hollywoodify it (as seems to happen to so many movies, whether they were made there or not). And at the same time give me some dazzling CG graphics, a proper 2nd head and third arm on Zaphod (real ones, just CGI attached).

    I really hope they can do it. Like that scene where they approach Magrathea, and the book steps in to tell the audience that noone will get hurt in the impending rocket attack. It's as un-hollywoodish as can be. And I love them for it.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re:That's just the problem, HE did. by dwillden · · Score: 2, Informative
      I really hope they can do it. Like that scene where they approach Magrathea, and the book steps in to tell the audience that noone will get hurt in the impending rocket attack. It's as un-hollywoodish as can be. And I love them for it.
      Like you I really hope they can do it, but will they really be able to show, or even attempt to show the short life of an ICBW(Intercontinental Ballistic Whale). I can hear the complaints from PETA already.

      Regardless I'll be in the theater with my towel in hand.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
  86. H2G2? by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    shouldn't that be hg2g?

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  87. A small sample... by Goonie · · Score: 1
    The beginning of The Restaurant at the End of the Universe, the second book in the five-volume trilogy, is as follows:

    The Story so far:

    In the beginning the Universe was created.

    This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.

    Many races believe that it was created by some sort of god, though the Jatravartid people of Viltvodle VI believe that the entire Universe was in fact sneezed out of the nose of a being called the Great Green Arkleseizeure.

    The Jatravartids, who live in perpetual fear of the time they call The Coming of The Great White Handkerchief, are small blue creatures with more than fifty arms each, who are therefore unique in being the only race in history to have invented the aerosol deodorant before the wheel....

    It goes on in this vein, but even funnier, over the five volumes (well, Mostly Harmless was probably more depressing than funny, but anyway)...

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
    1. Re:A small sample... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hrm...I just reserved my copy at the library...but to be honest that doesn't sound very funny. A bit too obvious.

  88. Zaphod by RainbowSix · · Score: 1

    "No word on who's playing Zaphod"

    Am I the only one who sees Zaphod as being played by Stephen Root in NewsRadio? (with an extra head and arm of course)

    --
    --------
    It's OK to be social, just don't tell anyone about it.
  89. They're BOOKS?!!! by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    I'm still trying to get that goddamned babelfish!!!!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:They're BOOKS?!!! by BeerCat · · Score: 0

      I'm still trying to get that goddamned babelfish!!!!

      You need to remember the junk mail on your doorstep. Hang your dressing gown on the hook, cover the drain with your towel, cover the panel with ford's satchel and put the junk mail on the satchel. Then press the Babel fish dispenser button. that should do it.

      --
      "She's furniture with a pulse"
  90. Re:Someone explain to the non-Hitchhiker educated. by tomcrick · · Score: 1

    "...and that fifth one no one really likes to talk about."

    I know what you mean. When I first read the trilogy, it was only in four parts, but when I finally purchased my own copy, there was the fifth part!

    I wasn't too sure about 'Mostly Harmless' the first time I read it, but after numerous readings it certainly grows on you. However, it was definitely written in a different style and you felt that Arthur had changed quite a bit. Nevertheless, it's still an amazing book and I am addicted to Adam's style of writing and his superb range of analogies e.g.

    "The ships hung in the sky in much the same way that bricks don't. ".

    As previously mentioned, I'm so glad that I have had the pleasure of reading the Hitchhiker books before the film. I'm also used to the voices of Ford and Arthur from the original BBC Radio tapes, so this will be very strange.

    However, after the comparisons with LOTR, I hadn't previously read the books (apart from a few attempts whilst at school) and after seeing the film, I can't wait to read the books...

  91. Eddie Izzard is overrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flame away, but it's true and I feel obligated to say so. I have seen Eddie Izzard live and he is not funny.

  92. It started as a radio series... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    do yourself a favour and start there...

    the characters evolve from there, and it makes more sense to go Radio -> Books -> TV Series than any other order...

    cheers
    Sara
    a macgrrl in an NT world

  93. Re:Wry look at "Life, The Universe, and Everything by Schnapple · · Score: 2, Interesting
    What drew me to the Hitchhikers Guide series?
    For me, I was in middle school and the Book Fair came into the library, offering to sell us all books. I remember seeing 12" LP's for this "Hitchhiker's Guide" thing and wondering what it was all about - and one of the books for sale was H2G2, so I bought it (amusingly, it reccomended "mature audiences"). Been hooked ever since.

    For the uninitiated, go into any bookstore in America and look for the "Ultimate Hitchhiker's Guide" - one volume, five+ books, $15. Cheap!

  94. Is that the one... by StringBlade · · Score: 1
    ...with the Life of Young Zaphod as one of the books?

    There was a single book that combined the first four H2G2 books plus this Life of Young Zaphod or something like that, which I gathered was an all around bad read.

    Just curious. My friend had that book and I loaned him Mostly Harmless so he could get the full 5-book triology. Most of the books are out of print now, though I'm they're available at the library and for sale privately on Amazon.com or Ebay.com.

    --
    ...and that's the way the cookie crumbles.
    1. Re:Is that the one... by IthnkImParanoid · · Score: 1

      The fifth book is "Young Zaphod Plays It Safe" IIRC.

      --
      It's nothing but crumpled porno and Ayn Rand.
    2. Re:Is that the one... by StringBlade · · Score: 1

      Ah, ok. Thanks. The fifth H2G2 book is actually Mostly Harmless and Young Zaphod Plays It Safe was never (to my knowledge) part of the 5 book triology of Hitchhiker's Guide. Though for some reason the publishers felt it was a good idea to put the first four books together with this book about young Zaphod instead of the real fifth book. Perhaps the fifth book wasn't written yet and they wanted filler? As I gather, the young Zaphod book is from Salmon of a Doubt and not the H2G2 series.

      --
      ...and that's the way the cookie crumbles.
  95. Re:Someone explain to the non-Hitchhiker educated. by TomV · · Score: 1

    What was it that drew everyone to Hitchhiker's?

    A friend simply wouldn't stop raving about this utterly bizarre new comedy on Radio 4, so I tuned in to Fit The Second and was instantly hooked. Then I went to a Stage version at the Theatr Clwyd in north Wales, then the first and second LP's on Megadodo Records. Then book and TV series though I can't remember which I met first. Each medium brought some new embellishments, and all bear re-listening, re-reading, re-viewing.

  96. LOL by Dolemite_the_Wiz · · Score: 1

    Oh, well. Let's just hope in the very least he doesn't do another theme song for this movie.

    (waiting for another post refering to an "I robot" theme song)

    hee hee

    Dolemite
    ________________

    --
    Save the World! Use a Quote!
  97. Re:Someone explain to the non-Hitchhiker educated. by GrahamCox · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Everyone seems to be saying read the book first. I disagree - get the radio series (a very nice CD box set came out last year). This is the start of the whole thing - the books were written afterwards. The radio series is where all the original ideas were born. Sometimes they didn't quite work, and the book sorted out some of that and a few inconsistencies... but that's part of the radio series' charm. In addition the sound effects are wonderful (even ground-breaking, for their time), and only enhance the imaginative experience. In other words, the radio series is the "one true source", and everything else is basically a rehash (not that it means they're bad, just best read/seen in the oredr in which they were published).

  98. Re:Keaton as Zaphod? How about Mos Def as Ford??? by the+gnat · · Score: 1

    I'm still trying to wrap my brain around that one.

    Thinking back to "The Italian Job" remix, it could be interesting...


    I liked him in that movie, but that doesn't count for much - however, he's been well reviewed in other stuff as well. He was in a play on Broadway at one point, and the NY Times liked him a lot.

    If I remember the books properly, Ford is basically uber-cool, slick, a total bad motherfucker but kind of loopy and obnoxious at the same time. I can definitely see Mos Def in that part. He's pretty close to my previous mental image (I never thought of Ford as being any particular race; he's Betelgeusean, anyway). Other actors I can see doing this might be Vince Vaughan, or in an ideal world maybe Nicholas Cage.

  99. I don't see what all the fuss is about... by iapetus · · Score: 4, Funny

    I thought everyone knew that Fords could be any colour you like, as long as they're black...

    --
    ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
    Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
    1. Re:I don't see what all the fuss is about... by Gothic_Walrus · · Score: 1
      Obscure Model T reference, eh?

      If I had mod points, you'd get some.

      --
      Goo goo g'joob.
  100. Should really be H^2*G^2... by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

    i.e. HHGG treated as a mathematical formula. This was very popular in the 80s, for example European Silicon Systems used to shorten their name to ES2 (with the 2 as a superscript). Thankfully the practice seems to have fallen into disuse in these more enlightened times.

    1. Re:Should really be H^2*G^2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Thankfully the practice seems to have fallen into disuse in these more enlightened times.


      Until Silent Storm (S^2)

  101. Sometimes, the movie is better by NickFusion · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes, everyone says that your own imagination is better than anything you'll see at the movies.

    Bah.

    Look at the credits for LotR. We're talking about 100s of professional dreamers, all channeling their combined skills into one magnificent creative act.

    They beat me. Their world was more brilliantly imagined, more consistently detailed than my lone brain could come up with reading those books as a kid.

    I think this is lazy-speak for another phenomemon. When you read a book, you are triggering fundamentally different feelings than you get watching a movie. There is a pleasure in reading that you don't get from film (and, I think, the converse is true).

    But, yes, I admit it. the combined talents of all the creative folk on LotR bested my imagination.

    Kudos to them. And good luck to the H2G2 crew, they have a big job ahead of them.

    --
    What were you expecting?
    1. Re:Sometimes, the movie is better by ignoramous · · Score: 1, Troll

      Look at the credits for LotR. We're talking about 100s of professional dreamers, all channeling their combined skills into one magnificent creative act.

      And coming up with the gayest, cheesiest jumping-on-bed scene I've ever been witness to. Nothing in the books was nearly that retarded when I was imagining it.

      The books were still better. Sorry.

      --


      I had a dream that I was dreaming about recursion.
    2. Re:Sometimes, the movie is better by ChuyMatt · · Score: 1
      The difference is the overall expectation of the chosen audience. You CAN be detailed and lush with a book, in a movie it looks like being slow and overbearing.

      Really, can you truly judge these people for their vision of what was in the book? If you talked to two LOTR fans before the movies you would have heard several explanations of what they thought a single scene looked like.

      also, the foolish jumping on the bed scene is about as corny as some of the lines in the book. Things on the page sound less stupid than said. Same with some scenes. (good god, how much crying can you get in 15 minutes?!). ANYway. rant on...

    3. Re:Sometimes, the movie is better by ignoramous · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree with you on the WoMD, though it's off topic. Also, I think that those whose vision more or less agreed with what was shown in the movie probably liked it better than those who were envisioning something completely different.

      Things on the page sound less stupid than said
      I know. Once I started actually 'listening' to Robert Jordan books (envisioning what the dialog would actually sound like, etc) I immediately stopped reading them. Actually I had other, bigger problems with them and it was just the last straw. I still read Gibson and consider him a great author, even though his dialog routinely sucks.
      However, that is part of my point in a way. When you're reading the books, your own mind can put a sort of filter on the language. Even though a sentence is corny, by the time you're 200 pages into a book you're no longer reading actual individual sentences, you're just sort of seeing stuff happening in the minds eye. That makes it easier to ignore the occasional cheesyness. Then you get a single scene which may be quite ridiculous, but because the rest of the book is good it somehow turns out OK, after it's run past a few mental filters. With a movie you're always at the mercy of the director, the script writer, and the actors. Personally, I value the experience of reading a good book over the experience of watching a movie based on a good book every single time. But then again that's just me, and this is WAY OFF TOPIC.

      By the way, who said I'm judging anybody? I've put out some pretty mediocre stuff, if you look at the sum total of everything I have ever done, but I don't consider myself worthless. I love Peter Jackson, and I watched all three Lord of the Rings flicks. All I was really saying was that the jumping scene was cornier - though I apologize for the non-PC language if it offends anybody - than anything in my minds eye when I was reading the book.

      --


      I had a dream that I was dreaming about recursion.
    4. Re:Sometimes, the movie is better by MilenCent · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They did not best my own personal imagination. Some (but by no means all) of the reasons:

      1. A movie has to be everything to all people, and this necessitates many trade-offs. My hypothetical best story is different from yours, and there are more people out there who would be happy with some lasers and rocket engines than would be happy Adams' superlative wit, just like there were more people who thought the Scouring of the Shire was an unnecessary add-on to the story than thought, like the author did, that it was an essential closing. With Lord of the Rings, this means that a whole bunch of people now consider these actors to be the definitive visual representations of these actors, and despite the fact that I generally liked the movies, I think that's a great shame.

      2. The modifier "professional" implies that someone can dream authoritatively. They cannot. In fact, I have a pretty low opinion of these people, for missing forests due to trees, looking at fine details while missing points. The people in the industry who most often connect words like "dream" with words like "profit" are Disney themselves, and despite a number of animated features, these days they tend to get it wrong more often than right.

      3. A movie is the work of hundreds of people, but some people are more important than others. Peter Jackson was much more important to the production than all the costume designers put together. If Jackson messes up, no one can make up for that deficiency.

      And a special case for this production:

      We're talking about DOUGLAS NOEL FREAKING ADAMS, for heaven's sake, a man I have always imagined as wit personified. These are not ordinary stories. I have never read anything else that zany and inventive, and I have no idea how the people making it can believe they can do it justice. Is Disney going to leave in Oolon Colluphid's philosophy books? Eccentricia Gallumbits? "Oh no, not again?"

      On a lesser, but related, note, I've always been more taken with the awesome, chest-bursting humor of Hitchhiker's than the story itself, which meanders from place to place, not always with a good reason. I think this fits the story nicely, very nicely indeed in fact, but I can't help but think that Disney will try to "improve" it. Doing so may well damage the humor.

      Anyway, sorry to disagree, sometimes the movie *is* better than the novel but I think this time it's impossible.

    5. Re:Sometimes, the movie is better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that the movies force you into one viewpoint. No matter how creative their set designers are, it robs you of being able to come up with your own ideas. Plus, according ot the nickpickers guide to LOTR, the set designers were very close to book in their designs.

    6. Re:Sometimes, the movie is better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zany?
      You motherfucker.

    7. Re:Sometimes, the movie is better by NickFusion · · Score: 1

      Beg to differ on the "professional" point.

      You may read it as authorative, but here I excerpt two definitions (www.dictionary.com)

      2. Engaging in a given activity as a source of livelihood or as a career: a professional writer.

      4. Having or showing great skill; expert: a professional repair job.

      The creative talents on LotR are professional dreamers (or if,you prefer, professional imaginers).

      Sorry. Being creative is a skill like any other skill. You become better at it with practice, and some people go into it professionally.

      Granted, this does not automatically make them better at it than enthusiasts, but that's how the smart money bets.

      --
      What were you expecting?
    8. Re:Sometimes, the movie is better by MilenCent · · Score: 1

      Heh, you may not believe this, but I thought for a few seconds before using the word "zany," which is particularly devalued in our culture, having been used to describe plenty of things which are purported to be funny but aren't. I decided to use it anyway because I rather like it, even if it tends to bring to mind thousands of half-wit prop comics.

    9. Re:Sometimes, the movie is better by MilenCent · · Score: 1

      Well, look at it this way. Who is the more imaginative, the various prop department stiffs who create models, armor, costumes, etc., or the author who created the work upon which they elaborate?

      I still take issue with the word professional, as it has been applied to "dreaming." It smacks, to me, of Disney-speak. (I've also never been able to trust the word "imagineering." It rummaged through my wallet, ran off with my girlfriend, poured sugar in my gas tank.)

      And I would say being creative is intrinsically not just like any other skill. Although you can get better at it, unlike, say, producing a craft, cooking a meal, etc., you can never be reasonably certain of success in it, no matter how good you get. It is intrinsically chaotic, there is an inescapable random component in creativity. This is why many authors, even exceedingly talented ones, continually feel insecure about their work, because you're only ever as good as your next book, and just because your last twelve were great doesn't mean number thirteen will likewise be so.

      Indeed, I'd say it's rather easy for a prolific creator to run out of ideas unless you put effort into maintaining your creative ecology. In other words, you can get worse at creating with practice.

  102. Spy Glass Entertainment not Disney by cens0r · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Just remember that this is actually being developed by Spy Glass Entertainment which is a subsidiary of Disney. Saying that the movie will suck because of Disney's involvement is like saying that ABC and ESPN are horrible because Disney is involved. Spyglass is the arm of disney responsible for The Insider, Seabiscut, The Sixth Sense, and Unbreakable among others. Now you may or may not like those movies, but I don't think they were especially Disneyfied. Saying that this is a Disney picture is like saying Kill Bill is a Disney picture simply because disney owns Miramax.

    --
    Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    1. Re:Spy Glass Entertainment not Disney by osu-neko · · Score: 1
      Okay then, you explain why ABC and ESPN are horrible...

      Good point, however. A lot of really, really good movies have been made by subsidiaries of Disney. You just need to watch out for the ones they actually brand as Disney movies rather than Touchstone/Miramax/Spyglass/etc. Those ones usually suck... usually...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    2. Re:Spy Glass Entertainment not Disney by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      In fact, Douglas Adams himself was quoted as saying, "Disney made Bambi, but they also made Pulp Fiction." I hope he turns out to be right. A nice, stylised, in-spirit HHGTTG film will be the best film ever.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  103. douglas adam brilliant, but disney will cutesify by richard_za · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I believe the hitchhikers radio plays and books from douglas adams are amongst the most creative and funniest work ever. It's interesting to note that jrr tolkien was adamant that Disney would never make a move over his body of work, especially after what they did to the work of the grimm brothers.

  104. Mickey Mice made Earth? by allrong · · Score: 4, Funny

    Surely the mice won't all look like Mickey will they? So long and thanks for all the Nemo?

    --
    What is the inverse of the Matrix?
  105. Spyglass, not really Disney by utahjazz · · Score: 1

    Disney is involved with several companies. e.g, they own Miramax which made "Pulp Fiction". That didn't suck.

    Spyglass, for exapmle, made "The Sixth Sense", which also did not suck.

    Don't look for this to be like "The Lion King" or something.

  106. Re:I think I'm going to have to read the book agai by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    Be careful which version you get. I finally read all of the "Complete" HHGTTG hardcover (missing Mostly Harmless) that I bought for Young Zaphod Plays It Safe, and the text is the Americanized version -- which can be jarring if you're used to the original version.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  107. Listen to the ORIGINAL incarnation of HHGTTG by tklancer · · Score: 3, Informative
    For those of you that are interested, KCRW has the original BBC Hitchhiker's Guide radio series up, accessible via RealWhatever.

    The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, by Douglas Adams

    Now, please refrain from slashdotting it until I've gone home for the day. I'm trying to listen to Fit the Third.

  108. Re:Someone explain to the non-Hitchhiker educated. by kalidasa · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Read the first three books first, in order (*Hitchiker's Guide*, *Restaurant at the End of the Universe*, and *Life the Universe, and Everything*). Then listen to the radio shows (it is vitally important that you listen to the radio shows and read the books BEFORE you watch the BBC television series). I'd suggest the books first because they are the highest quality, even if the radio series is the fons et origo. Note that there are important differences in the organization of the books and the radio series: but you'll be able to see how DNA reworked the material for the books, and will hear the actors rather than seeing them.

    After that, watch the BBC series. The BBC cast used mostly the folks from the radio cast. Thing is, they're radio actors, and they act like radio actors - their movement, blocking, etc. are all a little stiff, even if their voices are superb. Also, the budget was very tight, and the production quality (special effects, sets, wardrobe, and especially the prosthetic head) leaves much to be desired.

    Next, read two stories that appear in *The Salmon of Doubt*. The first is "Young Zaphod Plays it Safe* - the version in *Salmon of Doubt* is uncensored in the US, while the on in the *Ultimate Hitchiker's Guide* and the other omnibus editions are censored in the US so that the ending leaves you a little confused (the last line is dropped). The second (though probably the oldest story of all, though I never checked on it) is "The Private Life of Ghenghis Khan".

    After you've read those, it's time to read *So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish*. Enjoy. This one is a little more surreal than anything else, but it's still pretty damned funny (the biscuit story, which is absolutely realistic, is funny as hell).

    Now, wait until some time when you're in such a good mood that nothing, not enough universal apocalypse, will make you sad. Get your favorite blanky out of the attic, and call up your significant other and ask him/her/shim/sher to remain on standby for a call. You are now prepared to read the last book, *Mostly Harmless*. The whole book is very, very dark, even though it is still quite funny. A lot of people hated it because the ending is rather depressing, and there's some retroactive continuity that's stretched a bit thin, but if you're over 30 you'll get it right away (if not, I've got terrible news for you: this is what life is like).

    Then go out and get yourself a nice glass of orange juice and a breakfast sandwich. It will cheer you up.

  109. Yay for informative titles and descriptions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF IS H2G2. I shouldn't have to read the fucking comments to figure it out. sheesh.

  110. Re:Someone explain to the non-Hitchhiker educated. by osu-neko · · Score: 2, Interesting
    ...the biscuit story, which is absolutely realistic, is funny as hell...

    Not only is it realistic, it happens to be a true story -- it actually happened to Douglas Adams, who then just had to stick it into his next book.

    --
    "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
  111. Stephen Root as Zaphod by ddkilzer · · Score: 1

    Between his work in Office Space and O Brother, Where Art Thou? (among many others), I think Stephen Root would make a perfect Zaphod.

  112. I once asked Douglas Adams... by Dr.+Zowie · · Score: 5, Interesting
    ... where his towel was. It was in a large auditorium at the University of California (San Diego). He was talking about his new book, "So Long, and Thanks for All The Fish". It turned out that he didn't know where it was. But about half of the audience happened to have brought theirs, and started waving them about... :-)

    The towel story, he said, came from being on an extended vacation in Greece and never having a towel with him when his buddies wanted to go to the beach. The cooler folks always seemed to have theirs along.

    1. Re:I once asked Douglas Adams... by trans_err · · Score: 1

      I saw you then on a rebroadcast of that interview on some obscure Dish Network channel... Small world, eh? I was personally in stitches when you asked the inevitable.

    2. Re:I once asked Douglas Adams... by Dr.+Zowie · · Score: 1

      Heh. Small world. On the other hand, I can't be the only person ever to ask him that...

  113. Go stick your head in a pig by tttonyyy · · Score: 0
    If Disney include the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation robot choir singing:

    Share and Enjoy
    Share and Enjoy
    Journey through life
    With a plastic boy
    Or Girl by your side
    Let your pal be your guide
    And when it breaks down
    Or starts to annoy
    Or grinds when it moves
    And gives you no joy
    Cos it's eaten your hat
    Or had sex with your cat
    Bled oil on your floor
    Or ripped off your door
    You get to the point
    You can't stand any more
    Bring it to us, we won't give a fig
    We'll tell you, 'Go stick your head in a pig'.

    ...then I'll eat my Brockian Ultra-Cricket bat, and see if I don't.

    --
    biopowered.co.uk - catalytically cracking triglycerides for home automotive use since 2008. Just say no to big oil!
  114. Ali G!! by Commykilla · · Score: 1

    Martin Freeman was Ricky C from Ali G Indahouse! Resssspect!

    --
    Communism was just a red herring.
    1. Re:Ali G!! by Cackmobile · · Score: 1

      R E S T E C P !!!!

      --
      -- Karma Karma Karma Karma, Karma Chameleon - Boy George
  115. Get It Quick by JCMoney · · Score: 1

    Before it goes into the vault forever. And I do mean forever.

  116. Tim Burton Could Do A great job by wiremind · · Score: 1

    I think If they could get tim burton to help with the creation of the movie it could turn out almost as good as the book was....

    almost as good because no movie does its book justice, cuz reading the book always invokes the humans personal imagination.
    For example the ideas behind the book/movie 'sphere', when person reads the book, their imagination helps the feel afraid by imagining to THEM what would be scary out there, whereas the movie its forced to generalize that fear to a specific object. but i am going on a total tangent now, so i will stop.

    Kyle

  117. Somebody mod this funny right fucking now. by fenix+down · · Score: 1

    Jesus fucking God, you are a genius. That's the funniest thing I've seen on the internet in forever. Fuck, I think I fractured my fucking sternum I'm laughing so damn hard. Bacon, Jesus. Christ, I'm still laughing.

  118. Adams' thoughts on TV and Hollywood... by Dr.+Zowie · · Score: 3, Funny
    I heard Adams speak, in 1984, about the television series and, in particular, the HHG sequences within the series. Those sequences were all hand-animated (since computer graphics were actually expensive then!). He talked about how he saw the initial draft animations, and figured that that they were too complex for an American audience (in keeping with conventional Hollywood wisdom). Then he happened to be in the U.S. (maybe to cut a deal for the series, I forget why) and spotted some teenagers playing video games. That was the time when Xevious, Defender, and Sinistar were all the rage. Adams went back to the studio, he told us, and insisted that they redo the animations to make them more complicated.


    Here's hoping the creative/adaptive tam here has the same spirit of humorous overload!

  119. Karey Kirkpatrick info by decapentaplegic · · Score: 2, Informative

    Looks like Karey Kirkpatrick might be a pretty good choice for this projct since Adams is, well, unavailable. IMDB shows that Kirkpatrick has writing credits on some good films:

    The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy (2005)
    Laws of Attraction (2004) (post-production)
    The Little Vampire (2000)
    Chicken Run (2000)
    Honey, We Shrunk Ourselves (1997)
    James and the Giant Peach (1996)
    Rescuers Down Under, The (1990)

    Especially notable is James and the Giant Peach, a great film which did a great job of capturing the intent of Rohl Dahl, an author with a lot of similarities to Douglas Adams. As for Honey, We Shrunk Ourselves, well everybody has to pay the bills.

    Plus (you've got to love IMDB), his brother wrote the theme song to the TV series "America's Dumbest Criminals".

  120. Mattress? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm curious as heck to see if they're going to be able to portray the things "only a mattress" can do...

  121. Can't we have ONE fucking movie without a rapper?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just make (for lack of a better word) music, you assholes! Leave the acting to REAL actors! Especially when the movie in question is a screen adaptation of a beloved novel-- did they try to slip Ja Rule or another one of those generic, mush-mouth fucktards into LotR? NO!

    How else is shit-ass Disney going to ruin this movie? Only time will tell. We should install a seismograph over DMA's grave, so we can pinpoint the exact second he starts spinning.

  122. Please god, no, no by OriginalArlen · · Score: 2, Funny
    Mercy... save us all from this incipient horror... I speak as someone who's been listening to the Guide since 1979, can probably recite every line of the radio show in the saddest fanboy manner imaginable so yes, I'm never going to be happy but...

    Imagine this was LotR. Imagine they'd announced Tim from the Office as Frodo, Mos Def - who IS a great rapper, I only got into him after listening to Scritti Politti's wonder 'Anomie and Bonhomie' alubm but that's a tangent for another time - as Gareth, and that the film was going to be made by Disney.

    Ladies and Gentlemen... Disney presents: The Lord of the Rings!

    Ah well, what better reason to break out a bottle of Ol' Janx Spirit could you ask for? I may sing a little, it's just been - well, you know how it is.

    --

    Everything I needed to know about life, I learnt from Blake's Seven
  123. h2g2 or HG2G by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hitchhikers to guide to....

    Shouldn't that witty time saving acronym be;

    HG2G = Hitch Hikers Guide to the Galaxy?

    Where are all the geeky editor types?

  124. Re:Can't we have ONE fucking movie without a rappe by cens0r · · Score: 2, Informative

    Mos Def actually came from the theater community before he was a rapper.

    --
    Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
  125. I don't watch ESPN nor ABC by tepples · · Score: 1

    Disney is involved with several companies. e.g, they own Miramax

    So? Miramax's earnings, like any Disney earnings, still go straight back into lobbying for anti-consumer legislation such as a possible sequel to the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act and several proposed sequels to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.

    If you don't want to fund your enemy, here's what to avoid.

    1. Re:I don't watch ESPN nor ABC by Jason+Earl · · Score: 1

      Yes, Disney, along with the rest of Hollywood, is evil. That doesn't mean that they don't make some good movies. Personally I am glad that Disney is making this flick. I personally think that of all the movie houses Disney has the most class.

    2. Re:I don't watch ESPN nor ABC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Sure Musolini might be a Fascist, but that doesn't mean he can't make the trains run on time!"

      I believe that Godwinates this thread.

  126. It happened to The Italian Job... by holizz · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    And now another British classic is getting the Hollywood bastardisation, sorry, the Hollywood treatment whereby a film is destroyed and the basic plot is taken and Americanised and popularised. Hmm, if the Americans complain about our good humour all the time they're going to burn the cinema down after H2G2. I wonder if they could be made to burn America (USA) down.

    1. Re:It happened to The Italian Job... by Mongo222 · · Score: 1

      What world are you from? British humour is some of the most popular entertainment there is over here in the states. I grew up watching Monty Python, Dr. Who, Faulty Towers, Rippin Yawns, Red Drawf, ect. Hell, I even watched some East Enders, and more recent offerings. I just don't get it. Americans embrace your culture and laud your work and you hate us for it. Nice chip on the shoulder there.

    2. Re:It happened to The Italian Job... by Rallion · · Score: 1

      Hell, I'm reading a damn funny British book at the moment...It's in my hands, I'm holding my page. I like British humo(u)r above all. Bridget Jones' Diary was immensely popular in the states (I mean the book, by the way) and I doubt I know a person who can't describe scnes from at least three Monty Python films. British jokes are funnier than ours. We know it. It's wittier. It's funny and not just obscene. And in nearly every case, it's performed better, too.

  127. That's one cool frood... by xixax · · Score: 1

    ...and a bunch of l33t kidd3z who think I sound like Austin Powers.

    Xix.

    --
    "Everything is adjustable, provided you have the right tools"
  128. Black ford prefect? by femmefatale27 · · Score: 1

    Im not racist but what the hell?? I thought the whole character was based on an english school boy? Is this another American plot to add in a token black (american) guy, but alas he wont get killed in this? As a proud and English Douglas Adams fan I think he would be turning in his grave. Hey dare I say it but even Hugh Grant would have been a much better choice or they could have chosen a talented English actor. What next will they try to avoid upsetting muslims in the Restaurant at the end of the universe scene and use George Bush instead of a pig?

    1. Re:Black ford prefect? by Borg453b · · Score: 1

      It's a cow, in the book. Even though the thing in the tv series resembles a pig. It says something along the lines of:

      'A very wise choice, I'll just nip off and shoot myself. Don't worry, I'll be very humane./

      Sorry sweetie. Wanted to be the first to comment on your post, and I didnt know what else to write :D.. but yes, give us a white Ford Prefect.

      --

      - Mad, ingenous - they've both left you puzzled -
    2. Re:Black ford prefect? by femmefatale27 · · Score: 1

      Contradicted by my own man! Well I thought I better respond before this becomes a 'lets correct the non informed' post. There is a cow in it too and yeah as it does offer itself, it's the animal that everyone remembers so suppose they will have to change that too, as to not offend the Hindis! In the original film there was also a pig that sat on the table though, which is what I was refering too.

    3. Re:Black ford prefect? by Borg453b · · Score: 1

      Well, I thought I'd better easy you into slashdot. Corrections and geek-squabbles run rampant here and I thought I'd soften the first blow by uhm.. using my own hand (does that even make sense?) :P

      *kiss*

      --

      - Mad, ingenous - they've both left you puzzled -
  129. A Ford in any color, as long as it's black by Belgand · · Score: 1

    Is it just me or is it highly weird to have a black Ford Prefect? I mean, nothing against the guy, I'm sure he'll probably turn out to be an excellent actor, but it just doesn't quite seem right for the part.

  130. Join me by tepples · · Score: 1

    For those who would rather maintain principles than succumb to cravings for adaptations of DNA's work, there's Losing Nemo.

  131. Arthur was a perpetually confused British man, by hmccabe · · Score: 1

    so I just always assumed that Hugh Grant would play arthur.

    Oh well, I just hope it's good.

  132. British comedy in Hollywood by xixax · · Score: 1

    Can anyone think of any British comedies that have been remade in Hollywood and worked? I recall that Roseanne was going to do a US version of Ab Fab, but it was canned. Then there was the 1992 US version of Red Dwarf (try google for it and you mostly get ring tones).

    Xix.

    --
    "Everything is adjustable, provided you have the right tools"
    1. Re:British comedy in Hollywood by praksys · · Score: 1

      If by "worked" you mean "was popular" then there is always "Man About the House" and "Three's Company".

  133. Sirius Cybernetics Casting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Almost, but not quite, entirely unlike Ford.

  134. Mos Def by BiggsTheCat · · Score: 1

    A black Ford Prefect??? Are we ready for this?

    --

    Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so. --Ford Prefect

  135. Yeah, and like Disney is going to do social satire by Latent+Heat · · Score: 1
    I suppose Hitchhiker could be read and understood at a number of different levels, but I thought it worked best at the level of social satire. I mean really, that Earth was colonized by the passengers of the B-Ark, the hair dressers and telephone sanitizers of some planet, only there was no A-Ark or C-Ark for the leadership and working classes because the whole thing was just a ruse to rid society of the B-Ark people, only the whole planet died out from a plague virus spread on telephone receivers.

    Now how are the suits at Disney (B-Ark people, at best) supposed to understand any of this to convey it in the movie. It is just going to be one grand adventure like their take on Inspector Gadget and all of the satire will be lost in translation.

  136. Re:sig by dragonfly_blue · · Score: 1

    I like my women like I like my coffee - tied in a sack and thrown over the back of a donkey.

    --
    Free music from Jack Merlot.
  137. Ford's race and ethnicity by Latent+Heat · · Score: 1
    Not knowing the actor and how the actor will approach the character, are they going with black as in African American, or are they going with black as in West Indian British (after Red Dwarf)? I think that West Indian British would really work well -- Arthur is definitely a Brit and Ford seems like his alter ego.

    Zaphod, on the other hand, has to be an American. I always thought that Zaphod was a British take on American assertiveness.

  138. ... except it only applies to the web site by yoz · · Score: 3, Informative

    Heavy sigh...

    h2g2 (note the lower-casing) is the name of the online guide inspired by The Hitch Hiker's Guide To The Galaxy. It's considered "official" because it was created by The Digital Village Ltd., the new media company that had Douglas Adams amongst its directors, and he assisted in its creation. It is not the name of the book, the radio series, the game, or anything else. Just the online, fact-based guide.

    If you want to reference the fictional story or Guide with an abbreviation, I'd recommend HHGTTG. Or HHGG. Or HHG.

    -- Yoz, who was one of the four original developers of h2g2.com, and is also horrifically pedantic

    1. Re:... except it only applies to the web site by Tango42 · · Score: 1

      Hi Yoz!

      Someone should also point out that the url is now http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/ the url given before is extremely out of date.

      Tango
      (U32077 - don't mention me to any italics if you want a quiet life ;-))

    2. Re:... except it only applies to the web site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disney's Lawyer: I have a court order here ordering you to surrender the domain name h2g2.com as it's infringing our copyright.

      h2g2.com : But h2g2.com is a website inspired by The Hitch Hiker's Guide To The Galaxy and was assisted by Douglas Adams, the author of the book, when setting it up.

      Disney's Lawyer: Come on, everyone knows that the book was inspired by the film and that the name, Douglas Adams, was chosen using our Finite Improbability Generator (Patent Pending) as a pseudonym for the ghost writer we hired to turn the screenplay into a novel. Now hand it over!

      By a strange twist of fate a reel of the film was transported back in time to before the birth of Douglas Adams. Thus causing him to be sued by Disney for basing a story on a film for which they held copyright.

      Thereby, destroying the man who originally inspired the film and causing the said film to promptly disappear in a puff of logic.

      - with apologies to Douglas Adams and Directors Of The Sirius Cybernetics Corporation

    3. Re:... except it only applies to the web site by ThaReetLad · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up!!! Please!!! I know it's an ac but it's FUNNY gaddamnit

      --
      You can't win Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    4. Re:... except it only applies to the web site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we can get the Disney lawyers to prove Black is White then we can just wait for them to get killed o n the next zebra crossing.

  139. High-C of Meter Versus Yard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I'm breakin' crazy rhymes,
    The suckers can't stand it
    I put out the guide
    and it says "Don't Panic"

    - Meter Versus Yard - "Stars in my pocket like grains of sand"

    I suggest you look into the Canadian hip-hop scene as well. Governor Bolts, Buck 65, Sixtoo, etc.

    http://museeks.com/artists/1/meter_versus_yard.s ht ml

    indie hip-hop for the bespectacled bookwork nerd in each and every one of us! mangled beats and dictionary rhymes even your grandmother would approve of!

  140. My .02 by presearch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wish that Terry Gilliam would have been chosen as director.
    This movie treatment deserves to be something special/spectacular.

    also

    DNA narrated all of his books for Dove audio, and added (again) something special.
    It would be lovely if they would his voiceover for narration or for the guide itself.

  141. The only acceptable Zaphod by eVillager · · Score: 1
    --
    eVillager
    1. Re:The only acceptable Zaphod by Gleng · · Score: 1

      Ah, but Bruce Campbell should be in everything. I can't think of a single movie that couldn't be improved by some Campbell style zingers.

      --
      "Proudly Posting Without Reading The Article"
  142. A brunette Trillian! by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    Call Disney what you want, but their casting is doing a lot better than the TV series' ever did.

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    1. Re:A brunette Trillian! by Toutatis · · Score: 1

      You've seen her photo at IMDb. But look a bit further and you'll see that she is brunette, sometimes.

  143. Mos Def? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why the hell do they always have to make the cast politically correct? Oh, we need a black guy as one of the main characters. I'm sick of this crap. How the hell do they know that Ford's home planet has "African Americans"?

  144. Re:I think I'm going to have to read the book agai by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    Yeah, if you find the Americanised version you will be screaming "Belgium!" once you realise you bought it.

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  145. Re:Someone explain to the non-Hitchhiker educated. by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    See I think starting with the radio play would be advised, so you know what the story was like before it was refined/moved around a little to become the book. Some bits of the radio series are absolutely priceless and I can't believe they didn't carry over.

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  146. Re:Someone explain to the non-Hitchhiker educated. by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    For the love of all which is mighty, I will be taking a towel into that goddamned cinema even if I have to soak it in barbeque sauce and various other condiments as a preparation.

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  147. Read the names again. by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    Martin Freeman is playing Arthur...

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  148. Zaphod... by Big+Sean+O · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As a victory lap for his Oscar-nominated performance in Pirates of the Carribean, I nominate Johnny Depp.

    --
    My father is a blogger.
    1. Re:Zaphod... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Johnny Depp could be one head while Bruce Campbell plays the other.

      There, that's settled.

  149. Re:douglas adam brilliant, but disney will cutesif by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cutesy? Here's the Marvin proposal from over at Aintitcool.com

    http://www.aintitcool.com/image/hgttg-marvin.jpg

  150. Re:Someone explain to the non-Hitchhiker educated. by vfs · · Score: 1

    How the hell could you know about the Infocom games and yet claim to be "non-Hitchhiker educated"?

    Those games are probably 20 years old - I say "those games" because at the end of the first game they tell you to buy the soon-to-be released sequel. I guess that never made it...

  151. Mos Def (again) by st0rmshadow · · Score: 1

    Mos Def has given me a whole new reason to want to see this. I was estactic when I read that he'd be playing Ford, although I never even thought about Ford being black. In addition to easily being my favorite rapper, he's also a pretty good actor. Should be cool. Let's hope he has a big say in the soundtrack, too.

  152. Poor Poor Douglas by thunderpeel · · Score: 1

    I hope this movie isn't hacked up as much as I feel it will be. Honestly, I don't know where they will end the movie. Personally, for me my early teen years went, books, radio play, then BBC series, and I think THAT is the way it should be experienced. How many people are afraid that this will be a stake in poor Douglas Adams grave? I love the man .. liff and "last chance to see" are amazing as well, Dirk Gently is a god. Anyhow .. who is deeply afraid of Disney?

    --
    I really do know KungFu .. ..
  153. Not fair by teklob · · Score: 1

    damnit
    I was just about to go and read the books and then they announce the movie and rob me of the unfounded feeling of eliteness I'd have afterwards

  154. disney did Pirates by 1eyedhive · · Score: 1

    it should be noted tha disney produced Pirates of the Caribbean, which in my humble opinion is a kick-ass film, not at all disneyfied.

    I've read the first three of the pentilogy, can't wait to see this movie. I'll drag my friend (more likly, he'll be draggin me), who can quote every exerpt from The Guide in those books verbatim.

    --
    Logistical Chaos Officer http://www.slagg.org - LAN Gaming in Sarasota FL,USA
    1. Re:disney did Pirates by Rallion · · Score: 1

      Kill Bill is also ultimately a Disney movie...you know they own half the world, right?

  155. BBC Radiophonic Workshop by presidentnixon · · Score: 1

    Hasn't anyone else discovered Adams' alternate storyline? I'm saddened that Peter Jones is dead, he would have brought some credibility to the cast. Most of the actors slated for the current project are less than inspired choices.

  156. Re:Can't we have ONE fucking movie without a rappe by AvantLegion · · Score: 1
    Mos Def actually came from the theater community before he was a rapper.

    Yeah. As we see, he was on TV long before he ever released an album.

    To quote an article, "He attended a performing-arts high school in New York, where he worshipped at the altar of playwrights Edward Albee and Harold Pinter and Public Enemy and De La Soul."

    I agree that the "stick a rapper in every movie" trend is getting old - imagine if that were popular during the '80s hair metal days. But Mos Def doesn't qualify. No punishing him just because his music career fared better than Nimoy's.

  157. Why all this bruhaha over a black arthur? by dancingmad · · Score: 1

    In the Illustrated Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, an edition of the first book with photo illustrations, Zaphod was black and it worked really well.

    Ford isn't a color, he's an attitude and I think Mos Def can pull that off.

    --
    "There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter," Jeeves, (Jeeves and the Impending Doom)
  158. Tasmanian Zaphod? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They'd save on special FX

  159. Umm... by arothmanmusic · · Score: 1

    The only reason? Surely you're not forgetting the everpresent hotness of Keira Knightley?

  160. Missing In Action - Subplots by atcurtis · · Score: 1


    I simply hope is isn't like "Contact" where everyone wished that Carl Sagan was still alive so that whole subplots weren't ripped out of the film to make space for too-long special-effects shots. That they rewrote the screenplay after Douglas Adams' death does give ample grounds for concern...

    Makes me wish that Hollywood and the BBC resolved their licencing spat right from the start - we wouldn't have this long wait.

    But I am going to prepare to be disappointed.

    Not mentioned is who will be the voice of the Book - the starring role. They need a good no-nonsence clear-speaking narrator. Also - I hope they don't try to "sex-up" the Book's "computer" graphics... It was part of it's charm was it's green-screen simplicity (but I'll let them get away with real computer graphics with a bit more colour instead of the original hand-drawn ones)

    I think film producers love to wait for the death of an author before they make the film... It allows them to completely screw up without the author saying "I told you so!"

    Knowing Hollywood, they would use location shots on expensive bugets what the original acheived with a model, a cheap lightbulb and some bedsheets...

    --
    -- The universe began. Life started on a billion worlds...
    -- Except on one where stupidity was there first.
    1. Re:Missing In Action - Subplots by Doppleganger · · Score: 1

      I simply hope is isn't like "Contact" where everyone wished that Carl Sagan was still alive so that whole subplots weren't ripped out of the film to make space for too-long special-effects shots.

      That's interesting... according to the special features on the DVD, He collaborated very heavily on the screenplay, and his main focus was on keeping things scientifically accurate.

      [Zemeckis, director of the movie] "At one point, we actually debated for two hours on a line that two characters repeat. It ended up staying in the script."

      They also got approval for the idea of the much-compressed reception of the message from Sagan before using it.

      Decent point, but bad example to back it up.

  161. Bugblatter by atcurtis · · Score: 1

    Already have a Ravenous Bugblatter beast - got a cat who blatts and eats bugs all day!

    --
    -- The universe began. Life started on a billion worlds...
    -- Except on one where stupidity was there first.
  162. Douglas Adams had a huge role in the game by neffstar · · Score: 0

    He was a huge fan of interactive fiction (as it was known). I think he hoped that it would become much more mainstream than it did.

    Its sad to think that computers became too fast too quickly for this rather cool medium to take off. There really is nothing to compare these kinda games with. A lot of the games were really well written, and very funny. A graphic adventure game is a very different kettle of fish, so its almost like comparing a book to a movie.

    Anyone who hasn't played the text adventure of HHGTTG should definately do it (its free now).

    Getting off topic (even more), its unfortunate that the second coming of low powered computers (like PDAs, mobile phones and the like) didn't help revive the genre.

    *wipes tear* :P

    1. Re:Douglas Adams had a huge role in the game by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      And, for those who do decide to try out the text adventure version of HHGTTG, be aware that it contains what is, hands down, one of the most bizarre puzzles I have ever come across (and anyone who's played the came will know what I'm talking about :). Just a hint, it involves a Babelfish... :)

  163. Wait a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aren't ALL blacks from outer space?

    1. Re:Wait a minute by toupsie · · Score: 1

      According to certain Slashdot posters, only the ones that live an alternative lifestyle.

      --
      Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
  164. New meaning of the word Finalized. by NiteHaqr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The subject says casting is finalized.

    Yet the Article says that Zaphod is still to be cast!!!!

    Hmmmmmmm

  165. Disney. Heinlein. (was Re:What to expect..) by kulakovich · · Score: 1

    The author and creator of Mobile Suit Gundam, Yoshiyuki Tomino, published his first book in 1979. He later credits Heinlein's Starship Troopers as his inspiration. Ergo (laugh when you read that, pls), Heinlein started the so-called "Japanese Giant Robot Craze". I believe Mr. Tomino's remarks are in Grumbles From The Grave. Incidentally, Starship Troopers, was first published in 1959.

    To be a bit more on topic - don't forget that if Disney gets in over it's head with a movie (i.e. getting too PG rating oriented) they will just release it through Touchstone Pictures and leave it be. It has happened before - I think it even happened to The Nightmare Before Christmas.

    Kulakovich

  166. Red Dwarf? by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 1

    Well, for some reason my impression of Ford will always resemble the mad, bumbling version on the BBC TV series. I know the BBC series gets a lot of flak for handling the storyline so terribly, but the casting of Ford, Arthur, the Book and Marvin were as good as I thought they'd ever get.

    Now, the casting of Arthur and Marvin in this I accepted quickly (can't remember who's doing the Book, if anyone), but the choice of a black Ford works for me for a couple of reasons.

    First, the only real requirements for Ford are that he be reasonably inconspicuous and a bit crazed. There are a lot of people that could fill those shoes. Plus, England is just generally more colorblind then we are (our histories are surely to blame) and provided it makes sense (for instance, a black Ford living in Wales is probably less likely than a black Ford living in Manchester) there's no reason why he couldn't, or wouldn't be black.

    I know the one thing that's going to suffer from this translation is that, since this is the first real American production of the book, the English-ness will be massacred a-la Harry Potter. Having Mos Def as Ford allows his character to remain fundementally unchanged (still a crazy guy), plus give American audiences something they'll instantly recognize ("Look! A young black male in the supporting lead role! He must be the comic sidekick, like that Chris Tucker guy").

    Plus, you know companies like Disney love to play up their multiculturalism.

  167. Writing by chefbb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The main issue I see with the film is that one of the main appeal of Adams' writing is just that, his writing. There's no way in a film to portray "the ships hung in the sky in exactly the same way bricks don't" (hopefully i got that close enough)

    That said, i'm looking forward to seeing the movie provided the producers put their imaginations into it.

  168. Mos Def? by bonch · · Score: 1

    Is anyone else completely put off by the casting of Mos Def as Ford Prefect? Are there going to be grooving bass lines whenever he appears (he's also an underground hip-hop artist)?

  169. Re:Disney. Gack. by bonch · · Score: 1

    Douglas Adams himself would have disagreed with you. To paraphrase--Disney also put out The Rock, Pulp Fiction, and so on. They're one big entertainment company with a family division, just like Columbia and other studios.

    In other words, you look like another disestablishment moron. "It's Disney--well, it's gonna suck." I guarantee you'll see the movie anyway and probably like it and forget you even said that.

  170. Believe it or not by bonch · · Score: 1

    I think he's busy after being signed on to the upcoming Superman movie--playing Lex Luthor.

    The Superman fiasco over at Warner Bros. is a whole other article. Beyonce Knowles is signed on to play Lois Lane!

  171. Re:Disney. Gack. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Funny -- I liked Monsters Inc., because Billy Crystal and John Goodman are funny.


    Disney sucks. Their movies, sometimes, very rarely, are good. Miramax, the poor bastards, make good films.


    I don't have a problem with Miramax. I have a problem with the epitome of sugar-coated BS, constructed in careful accordance with marketing plans for millions of crappy toys. That would be...Disney. Disney didn't buy Miramax to be a "more balanced entertainment empire" or some such schlock -- they bought them because they like the numbers on their balance statement to have as many zeros after them as possible.


    Disney owns Miramax. They are really not even close to the same thing.


    I am disestablishment...and if people who defend Disney don't like me or what I'm saying, then I'm probably doing something right. Thanks. :)

  172. Lots of people are saying "how", but by PotatoHead · · Score: 1

    here is my "why":

    I read the books first, then heard the radio series.

    For me, the appeal is in the wit. Adams can poke fun at the way things work, or could work, like no other.

    Like the idea that we are decendants from all the ancillary people another race decided they didn't want. These folks sent all of their useless, unproductive people, receptionists, phone polishers and such and sent them on an automated one way journey to someplace else. When they arrived, their presense killed off the real humans who happened to just be getting started learning the basics of grunting.

    The idea that our past could be something like this is unusually hard to imagine. Expressing it is highly creative. Most of the story is like that. It is just not something you see every day. In fact, it is not something we should have seen at all really.

    The fact that we did is a gift, plain and simple.

    The goofy names and phrases played off of the sound of things too.

    Pan-Galactic Gargle Blaster, hoopy, Zaphod Beeblebrox... --Vogons. BTW, have you ever read of a fictional race starting with a V that people liked? Vogons just sound bad, and of course they are in the book. Adams had a sense for that that flows throughout the story. Ever read books that had good stories, but the names and places were just "off"?

    Nobody wants to like the Vogons. Why? Because they are Vogons dammit! Don't you know anything? Most people would like a dinner at Milliways. Why? Because it sounds good. What else would you call the Resturant at the End of the Universe?

    Seriously, I am not trying to pretend to be funny, but am really trying to make a point. The play on words often found in these stories makes immediate sense while poking fun at our preconcieved notions of things. (Spelling czars relax --it's late.)

    I get the distinct feeling Adams had a feel for the written word that most of us really don't grok well enough to create like he does. Reading the books makes immediate sense, but the mindset that would produce such a work is hard to imagine.

    Totally out of the box would likely be a better way of saying this.

    The scale of things:

    Man, the book covers immense stretches of time and distance like they are nothing. {Which they are really, but that is not my point.} You get a twisted tongue 'n cheek look at the history of mankind, a trip to the end of the universe and all of the places in between.

    My little comment in brackets is typical of things you will read as well. One moment you are in the story, another you are being told something subtle that should be obvious, but really isn't until you read it. The result is often funny and thought provoking at the same time. (Not that my example is anything like that, but I had to try.)

    Crazy ideas like rock concerts with entire planets used for sound... Or Peril Sensitive Sunglasses. (They turn black at the first sign of danger!)

    I have never read anything like it since. Probably the only way I can express this is to say that every other story I have read can be compared to other stories. You just can't do that with the Hitchhikers Guide. It is really different. Nobody has ever said Douglas Adams stories are like _______.

    Now, having written this, I feel like a total lamer. I suppose that is what I get for trying to say "why", but what the hell, you asked.

    Just read the books. Take it slowly at first and let your mind wander. You will be surprised at where it might go. In a twisted sort of way, you will be better for the experience.