Slashdot Mirror


Forward This Article And Get Paid $203.15

Iphtashu Fitz writes "We've all seen it. The e-mail forwarded to us from a friend who got it from a coworker whose sister's cousin's roommate's great aunt knows somebody at Microsoft. The one from Bill Gates himself offering you cash to forward the e-mail to others in order to test out their new e-mail tracking system. If you haven't received that one you've undoubtedly gotten other e-mail hoaxes offering anything from gift certificates to free computers to free airline tickets. How do these sorts of hoaxes start and who starts them? Well Jonathon Keats at Wired Magazine decided to track down the origin of the Bill Gates e-mail tracking hoax. After a few dead ends he finally located then-student Bryan Mack, who created the hoax on November 18, 1997 while at the University of Houston. In Mack's own words: 'It was just a joke between a couple friends' that eventually got out of hand. One of his buddies had gotten a make-money-fast spam and Mack said 'I can come up with something better than that.' Three minutes later, Bill Gates' email-tracing program was born. At first he just sent it to a few friends, but those friends sent it to other friends (and so on), and it didn't take long for the e-mail to transform from a joke to a full-fledged hoax."

531 comments

  1. *sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why do I even subscribe to Wired anymore, I can get the whole magazine in 2 weeks worth of articles on Slashdot, with full discussions...

    Oh wait I know why, the pretty colors of the magazine!!!

    1. Re:*sigh* by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Why do I even subscribe to Wired anymore, I can get the whole magazine in 2 weeks worth of articles on Slashdot, with full discussions..."

      Bathroom reading, man.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:*sigh* by Solar+Limb · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Wired's a kickass rag, even if the content is nearly all online. It looks good on the Ikea coffee table, and it advertises to all guests that you are, in fact, smarter than them, what with their piffy pedestrian Newsweek and People subscriptions. Pshaw!

    3. Re:*sigh* by nosphalot · · Score: 5, Funny
      Bathroom reading, man.

      When did Wired get a swimsuit issue?

    4. Re:*sigh* by phlyingpenguin · · Score: 2, Funny

      ummmmm hello wifi?

    5. Re:*sigh* by mrjackson2000 · · Score: 1

      i use then for mousepads

    6. Re:*sigh* by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

      "ummmmm hello wifi?"

      Heh my girlfriend gave me a strange look when I logged on to IRC from the bathroom. For some reason, reading in the bathroom is okay, but chatting on-line is the equivalent of announcing the desire for somebody to invent 7-day underwear.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    7. Re:*sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear your pain.

      We've got a rule at my house. What goes in the bathroom, stays in the bathroom. Other than people, of course.

      I found out about this rule when trying to show my wife an interesting article I was reading. She looked like I was handing her a plate of feces.

    8. Re:*sigh* by Blimey85 · · Score: 1

      "Bathroom reading, man." That's what laptops with wireless are for!

      --
      How is it that one careless match can start a forest fire, but it takes a whole box to start a campfire?
    9. Re:*sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why do I even subscribe to Wired anymore, I can get the whole magazine in 2 weeks worth of articles on Slashdot, with full discussions...

      I thought it was for ads...

    10. Re:*sigh* by RevAaron · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not sure about you, but taking a dump with a laptop on your lap is weird. To each his own, sure, but it's not for me.

      What does work wonderfully is a PDA. I just have books/articles pre-downloaded to the PDA, often before I leave the house in the morning, but you can just as easily get a wireless card for most PDAs sold today if you'd prefer.

      Having a PDA with reading material is nice in a lot of ways, actually. Since I first got a PDA, a bunch of years ago, I've started reading a lot. That is, when my reading material is always waiting in my pocket and conveniently brought out and quickly put away, I will read for a single page in times that otherwise I'd just have to stand there trying to achieve zen blankness of mind. Hell, I even read when I'm taking a piss- a page here, a page there. It's a great way to get leisure reading done when you're so busy between working full-time and taking a full-time load of college credits that you can't afford to actually sit down for an hour and read a novel.

      Also, there's more you can do on your PDA than just read on the toilet. I've written at least a few hundred lines of code as well, mostly in Squeak Smalltalk, but also in Lisp and NewtonScript.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    11. Re:*sigh* by NuclearDog · · Score: 0

      Sadly, I must admit to having gone overboard and also placed an ethernet port in my bathroom too... You haven't lived until you've taken over a friends server while sitting on the can...

      ND

      --
      This statement is forty-five characters long.
    12. Re:*sigh* by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Why do I even subscribe to Wired anymore

      So your neighbors will think you're as cool as we do...

    13. Re:*sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn swimsuit editions. Every time I put one of those in my swimsuit, it disintegrates. You'd think that they'd take immersion into account when choosing what to print them on.

    14. Re:*sigh* by Zorkerman · · Score: 0

      I find that my crappy t61 (that was sent to me as a replacement for a conveniently broken t68i) has a game deep abyss, that strangely suits my bathroom time killing pursuits quite well.

    15. Re:*sigh* by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Having a PDA with reading material is nice in a lot of ways, actually. Since I first got a PDA, a bunch of years ago, I've started reading a lot. That is, when my reading material is always waiting in my pocket and conveniently brought out and quickly put away, I will read for a single page in times that otherwise I'd just have to stand there trying to achieve zen blankness of mind."

      AvantGo is one of the most beneficial services I've ever recieved in a bathroom.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    16. Re:*sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I found out about this rule when trying to show my wife an interesting article I was reading. She looked like I was handing her a plate of feces.

      She was in the bathroom at the same time?

    17. Re:*sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Not sure about you, but taking a dump with a laptop on your lap is weird."

      Sounds like your the pot calling the kettle black, if you know what I mean. I think it's the same damn thing whether you have a laptop or a little laptop (PDA). Just do your business on the john and write your lines of code when there is no residue crap on your ass.

    18. Re:*sigh* by The+Grassy+Knoll · · Score: 1

      >That is, when my reading material is always waiting in my pocket and conveniently brought out and quickly put away

      In other news: BOOKS INVENTED. More at 11.

      --
      They will never know the simple pleasure of a monkey knife fight
    19. Re:*sigh* by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      Bathroom reading, man.

      Pervert!

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    20. Re:*sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please let slashdotters know what your ebay screenname is incase you decide to sell your PDA on there

    21. Re:*sigh* by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      Nope, but books aren't quite the same. See, in a lot of situations in today's world, it's socially fine for me to pull out my PDA and start reading. It was fine for me to have it with me all the time to begin with. A book, on the other hand, is something different. For me to bring a book with me all the time can be seen as rude- after all, some folks may think that I do it in preperation of being bored. Which may be true, but offensive regardless. A PDA, though... that is something that attains part of its usefulness by being available all the time. For most folks it may not be about being able to read at any time or place, rather about having information readily available. Same thing in the end though, no?

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    22. Re:*sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The other day I was in a stall and the guy next to me started talking. Thinking his side might be out of toilet paper or something, I replied.

      "Do you mind?' he said, "I'm on the phone!"

      I made sure to flush several times on both sides of him on the way out!

    23. Re:*sigh* by harkabeeparolyn · · Score: 1
      AvantGo is one of the most beneficial services I've ever recieved in a bathroom.

      Your lovers need to be much more creative.

  2. Ah... good old hoaxes... by jawtheshark · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Yes, I got this one too, like probably everyone else here. Along with many others like the ones where Nokia gives away free cellphones. As an IT person I immediately see that they are just jokes, but I'm pretty sure my mom would think this could really happen.

    On the other hand: back in the day we got email hoaxes stating there was a new virus that could be triggered by just opening the email. Back then we laughed with those pranks because we knew it was impossible. I kept laughing, until the day it really happened. Of course it didn't concern me because I read my email with pine, but I wasn't all too happy of that evolution... What I thought to be impossible had suddenly become a reality.

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  3. Awesome... by badfrog · · Score: 4, Funny

    I finally know the name of the man I've wanted to kill for the past 7 years.

    1. Re:Awesome... by kisrael · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's a little funny, but I haven't seen the mail since the 90s and even then it was pretty small potatoes...people were getting to be a little net-saavy by then, or rather there weren't as many idiots, or if there were they had smarter friends pointing out the error of their ways.

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    2. re: awesome... by ed.han · · Score: 1

      why, is he the guy that keeps throwing those messages in empty beer bottles? :>

      ed

    3. Re:Awesome... by zerocool^ · · Score: 4, Funny


      Your name isn't... Inigo Montoya... is it..??

      --
      sig?
    4. Re:Awesome... by WinterSolstice · · Score: 1

      Offtopic, sorry:
      Zero cool? Is that a reference to "Hackers", by any chance?

      -WS

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    5. Re:Awesome... by perdu · · Score: 1
      I finally know the name of the man I've wanted to kill for the past 7 years
      Now, where's that LocatePlus Database so we's can track him down?

      --
      You only use 2% of your DNA
    6. Re:Awesome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's an old email for you:

      brymack@iastate.edu

      and his website:

      http://www.fleetmack.com/

    7. Re:Awesome... by AndroidCat · · Score: 5, Funny

      It must be a hell of an accent if it changes the spelling too! Zowie!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    8. Re:Awesome... by mikey_boy · · Score: 1

      no his name was Inigo ... I've got the book right in front of me that says so ...

    9. Re:Awesome... by lythotype · · Score: 1

      Incontheivable!

      Are you sure it's Indigo? Imdb has the character titled "Inigo Montoya" played by Mandy Patinkin. You can check it out here

    10. Re:Awesome... by LehiNephi · · Score: 1

      It's a reference to The Princess Bride (book and movie). I have yet to watch a movie with more quotable one-liners.

      --
      Help find a cure for cancer. Join the [H]orde
    11. Re:Awesome... by Issue9mm · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Wrong.

    12. Re:Awesome... by The+Other+White+Boy · · Score: 1
    13. re: awesome... by ed.han · · Score: 1

      uh, he's asking about the poster's handle.

      ed

    14. Re:Awesome... by Solar+Limb · · Score: 1
      Incontheivable!

      You keep saying that word. I do not think you know what it means.

    15. Re:Awesome... by identity0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't kill him yet, I still need to collect $23,000 from him.

    16. Re:Awesome... by Zigg · · Score: 1

      When, exactly, did the University of Houston end up in Iowa?

    17. Re:Awesome... by WinterSolstice · · Score: 1

      You have killed my father... prepare to die!

      -WS

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    18. Re:Awesome... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't think it's spelled the way you think it's spelled.

    19. Re:Awesome... by kippa · · Score: 1

      I do not think it means what you think it means.

    20. Re:Awesome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aye

      Can someone dad a bottle of broon ale off his melon in the student union bar and tell him not to be a daft lad in future.

      Sheeesh

    21. Re:Awesome... by Howlett · · Score: 1

      Anybody want a peanut?

    22. Re:Awesome... by zoloto · · Score: 1

      LehiNephi^ isn't that a reference to something in the Book of Mormon?

    23. Re:Awesome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      idntimwytim

    24. Re:Awesome... by zangdesign · · Score: 2, Funny

      You can get that much for his kidneys on the black market. All you need is a whole bunch of ice and a bathtub.

      --
      To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
    25. Re:Awesome... by dracken · · Score: 1

      RE: FWD: FWD: RE: RE: FWD: fwd: re: RE: FWD:FWD: fwd: re: RE: FWD: FWD: fwd: re: RE: FWD: FWD:

      > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > > > > > >
      > > > > > > But his mails are so good to look at :^)

    26. Re:Awesome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the book of bullshit, Lehi is Nephi's father and they, along with other family members, travel the ocean to set up the third populace group in America (first, Garden of Eden times - Missouri; second some "Jaredites" from the tower of babel time) based in Jewish-Egyptian tradition.
      Anyhow, it's a bunch of crap.

    27. Re:Awesome... by drxenos · · Score: 1

      What do you mean? That is how it is spelled. It's not "Indigo" if that is what you are thinking. Read the book.

      --


      Anonymous Cowards suck.
    28. Re:Awesome... by drxenos · · Score: 1

      No, it is spelled Inigo. Read the book. His accent doesn't make him mispronounce his own name. The English speaker are the ones who mispronounce it.

      --


      Anonymous Cowards suck.
    29. Re:Awesome... by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      Actually... the name is Iñigo Montoya. Iñigo is an actual (somewhat common in fact) spanish name. The pronunciation is somewhere near Inyigo.

    30. Re:Awesome... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Which one? The original book by S. Morgenstern, or the one abridged by William Goldman?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    31. Re:Awesome... by screwballicus · · Score: 1

      Your name isn't... Inigo Montoya... is it..??

      That...depends.

      I do not mean to pry, but you don't by any chance happen to have six fingers on your right hand?

    32. Re:Awesome... by zerocool^ · · Score: 1

      Yeah, back in 1999 when I signed up for my slashdot account, I thought it would be funny to take the same name as the guy in the movie hackers. Which, to me, is still funny. And, screw everyone else, I like that movie, even for all its faults.

      Unfortunately, I've kind of locked myself into a corner here - people see zerocool and don't take me seriously, however, the UID is so low, i'm not willing to give it up.

      Whatever, people are people.

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
    33. Re:Awesome... by zerocool^ · · Score: 1

      Just to let you know... I got your joke. It didn't go un-noticed.

      And if you didn't mean it as a joke, yeah, um, I hate to be the one to tell you, but there's no S. Morgenstern.

      ~Wx

      --
      sig?
    34. Re:Awesome... by Tokerat · · Score: 1


      If you killed him completely and sold all his organs off you'd be even richer.

      If we raise the money from this, I have a friend who's uncle used to hold a large Nicaraguan fortune which we needs the legal fees to release to us, and he has promised us in return a very large sum of money! He is writing to me in his complete trust.

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    35. Re:Awesome... by MikeyVB · · Score: 1
      I finally know the name of the man I've wanted to kill for the past 7 years.

      A number of years ago (when ICQ was still considered new) and the "Good Times Virus" was making it's rounds, I ran into someone who felt the same as you. I couldn't find the original post he made on the ICQ web site, but here is a copy I found. It is funny as hell.

      http://www.computerbits.com/archive/1999/0300/viru s.html
    36. Re:Awesome... by lilchris · · Score: 1

      Hackers is an excellent movie! Sure all of the technical stuff is wrong, but at least it's all OBVIOUSLY wrong. It's a movie, it's not meant to be accurate, just to be entertaining. (which it is!)

      Maybe I should have signed up with the name Phantom Phreak or something..

    37. Re:Awesome... by drxenos · · Score: 1

      Um, yes there was. The "Princess Bride" was a very long, very dry satire that is now out of print. William Goldman's father use to read it to him and he loved it. Later, when he had his own son, he tracked down an English version in an out-of-print bookstore. He took it home, and his son didn't like it. Stunned, William Goldman purused the book and discovered that his father had only ever read the "good parts." So, he wrote an abridged version and spend many years, on and off, trying to make a movie out of it.

      --


      Anonymous Cowards suck.
    38. Re:Awesome... by drxenos · · Score: 1

      Both, actually.

      --


      Anonymous Cowards suck.
    39. Re:Awesome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Wikipedia entry disagrees, I'm afraid.

    40. Re:Awesome... by drxenos · · Score: 1

      I don't care what they say. I have an edition of Goldman's book where *he* explains the origins of it in the foreword. It's his book, he would know more then they about it.

      --


      Anonymous Cowards suck.
    41. Re:Awesome... by papercut2a · · Score: 1

      the CIAC site has a copy as well, along with another version that someone wrote.

  4. yeah by NetNinja · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It's all fun and games until?

  5. Can Wired Survive? by gevmage · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Can this wired magazine article survive a slashdotting? Tune in next week!

    --
    Craig Steffen
    http://www.craigsteffen.net
    1. Re:Can Wired Survive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can this wired magazine article survive a slashdotting? Tune in next week!
      Craig Steffen
      http://www.craigsteffen.net

      I think the real question is, "Can craigsteffen.net survive a slashdotting?"

    2. Re:Can Wired Survive? by Solar+Limb · · Score: 1
      Probably not. A hearty /.ing would make Wired tired, and we all know how much Wired hates things that are tired.

      Well, at least I do.

  6. Hoax?!? by ari_j · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You mean it doesn't work!?!? I've been forwarding those dang things for 7 years now trying to make an honest buck, and you tell me now!

    Seriously, do the people who fall for this even think to consider the ramifications of their e-mail being tracked by Microsoft in the first place? That was a rhetorical question, of course - anyone stupid enough to go for this crap isn't smart enough to know he has civil rights, much less care about whether it's the government or a big corporation taking them away.

    1. Re:Hoax?!? by tm2b · · Score: 5, Interesting
      anyone stupid enough to go for this crap isn't smart enough to know he has civil rights,
      I had a lot of my nontechnical friends and family ask me about this when it first went around. They were concerned about the privacy issues. The money issue aside, your snide inside is really unfair, for two reasons:
      • A lot of smart people don't know anything about the underlying technology. They don't know that an email message is usually just a bunch of alphanumerics. On the other hand, that ignores attachments and other content that can be made active by the MUA. Which brings us to:

      • Don't you think that if Microsoft could make a serious buck off of it, they would implement something that allowed them to track certain bits of mail? Some bit of ActiveX that, when signed by Microsoft, would always be run by Microsoft MUAs?
      Sure, the money hook is obviously absurd. But the technology end isn't as absurd now as is seemed in 1997. Back then, executing content that any stranger sent you was obviously something that any reasonable company would take steps to prevent. This is definitely a way in which Microsoft has "innovated."
      --
      "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
    2. Re:Hoax?!? by Aslan72 · · Score: 4, Funny
      It worked for me! :)

      Now I'm sitting in the Nigera with my friends from several banking institutions wondering how we can get the money out of the country. Perhaps we could have your help?

      --pete

    3. Re:Hoax?!? by ari_j · · Score: 1

      You read me a little bit wrong, possibly due to the incorrect moderation of my comment. How people got in the Insightful bandwagon on that one, I don't know. I post a lot of insightful comments, but this one was 90% Funny.

      That said, I can't tell you how many times I replied to friends who sent this to me 6 years ago to indicate that it was a hoax and clear up why it was so. Yeah, if Microsoft could make a buck on tracking your e-mail, they would; and, if they started, I'd help everyone I know get set up to use completely non-Microsoft e-mail software.

      I think an analogy I would have used to dispel this was along the lines of it being equivalent to Wal-Mart tracking your snail mail and giving you a check for $200 every time you send a copy of their letter to someone. It's so entirely absurd, but exactly equivalent: without Wal-Mart having some tracking device on your mail box, it's not really possible. The same goes for Microsoft tracking your e-mail.

      On another side note, this article is poorly written. I've never seen anyone overuse the word "windfall" until today and, as others have pointed out here, the author shouldn't be writing for a technology periodical if he was for more than a tenth of a second convinced by this hoax in 2004.

    4. Re:Hoax?!? by mattOzan · · Score: 1

      Not having your email-forwarding transactions recorded is a civil right? Boy, they thought of everything back in 1964!

    5. Re:Hoax?!? by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

      I would but I'm too busy getting my money from a very nice Swiss banker.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    6. Re:Hoax?!? by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Seriously, do the people who fall for this even think to consider the ramifications of their e-mail being tracked by Microsoft in the first place?"

      No. What they do consider is that with minimal effort, there's a small chance they'll make $50. If it never arrives, they have little to lose. This is hardly a useful IQ test.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    7. Re:Hoax?!? by ari_j · · Score: 1

      I never said anything about e-mail privacy being a civil right. (It is, but not one explicitly protected by the US Constitution. You may want to check up on the 9th Amendment for more on whether not being explicitly protected implies a denial of that right.) I merely inferred that anyone not aware of the privacy concerns of Microsoft tracking their e-mail is likely unaware of the civil rights they do have, and wouldn't mind terribly if it was the US government or someone else taking them away.

    8. Re:Hoax?!? by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Did you read the next sentence? The quoted was a rhetorical question. Yeah, it's definitely an unfair IQ test in the terms you present, but it does say something about how little most people care for their privacy.

    9. Re:Hoax?!? by freeduke · · Score: 1
      You mean it doesn't work!?!? I've been forwarding those dang things for 7 years now trying to make an honest buck, and you tell me now!

      OK, let's get something more rewarding than those Hoaxes: everyone who moderates this post +1 will get 203.16$ !

      What is really funny in this digital world is that the global comportment follows the human way of thinking...

    10. Re:Hoax?!? by NanoGator · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "Did you read the next sentence? The quoted was a rhetorical question."

      That doesn't prohibit me from answering. Your basic premise is severely flawed by the lack of data.

      " but it does say something about how little most people care for their privacy."

      No, it doesn't. The only thing it says is "people sent out emails." The rest is pure speculation with no data to back up any of it. Even somebody who was uppity about privacy
      wouldn't necessarily behave consistently here.

      My point? This is one of those generalizatiosn that just plain isn't insightful.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    11. Re:Hoax?!? by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

      well, you if you got all the history in the email, you got a sucker list of friends to scam. you could always send them a link to your web page to enter in the bank account/visa for bill gates to deposit the check into...

      I was tempted to do that, with the husbands consent first, just to see how gulible my friend was.

    12. Re:Hoax?!? by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

      yet you probably advocate that linux is so easy your (or my) grandmother could use it. who do you think falls for this stuff? certainly not the typical slashdotter...

    13. Re:Hoax?!? by Tuffsnake · · Score: 1

      yeah but think about back to 1997, as little as the average person may/may not know now, they knew magnitudes less back then. I mean, your typical email user back then probably had the following thought process when using email:

      Step 1) Press button on computer that lights up
      Step 2)
      Step 3) Email


      I have noticed significantly less of these hoax emails lately and I would say that that shows an increase in the average persons computer IQ and I would hazard to guess in the future these hoaxes will eventually give way completely to other things such as super helpful emails about debt consolidation and P***s enlagement :P

    14. Re:Hoax?!? by ari_j · · Score: 1

      How does accepting that Microsoft wants to and possibly can track all your e-mail activity not imply not caring particularly much about your privacy in e-mail? This is a logical statement. You're the one attacking me with no data to back yourself up.

    15. Re:Hoax?!? by morcheeba · · Score: 1

      No, that's not the way it's done. Try:
      ----

      It woorked for me! :)

      Now I'm residing in the Nigera with my dead deposed father dictator (see coverage on nbc and other tv) and several esteemed banking institutions in my country wondering how we can transfer the monies (TWO HUNDREND AND THIRTY THOUSAND AMERICAN DOLLARS) out of the country. Perhaps we could have your assistance, for I know for sure you are a good person?

      --Pete Avignia, honorable civil servant at your service.

      p.s. Discretion is of the utmost importance in this matter. Please send your banking account number as a sign of good faith.

    16. Re:Hoax?!? by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Actually, neither Linux nor Windows is easy enough that my grandmother can use it. I don't suspect she'd notice if I swapped it out on her. ;)

    17. Re:Hoax?!? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "How does accepting that Microsoft wants to..."

      Who accepted what? You don't even know if the people forwarding those messages took them seriously.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    18. Re:Hoax?!? by GuyinVA · · Score: 1

      Actually it does work. After all the people I sent it to, I was averaging ~$385 a person i sent it to. How do you think I can afford all those video cards that come out every month?

    19. Re:Hoax?!? by ari_j · · Score: 1

      I know for a fact that many of the people forwarding them 5 or more years ago did take them seriously, implying acceptance that Microsoft was at that time able to track at least that one e-mail and tag it at least 2 generations later to their e-mail address.

    20. Re:Hoax?!? by forevermore · · Score: 1
      Some bit of ActiveX that, when signed by Microsoft, would always be run by Microsoft MUAs?

      Or better yet, an embedded <img> tag (or something similar) that is just like what the spammers use for tracking valid email addresses. There are several companies that offer this technology to consumers. Problem is, it doesn't work if you use a mail client capable of blocking "remote" images (which is a feature even webmail providers are starting to offer.

      --
      Do you really need reason for beer? Wingman Brewers
    21. Re:Hoax?!? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      " implying acceptance that Microsoft was at that time able to track at least that one e-mail and tag it at least 2 generations later to their e-mail address."

      All it really implies is that they wanted to earn $50.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    22. Re:Hoax?!? by greenegg77 · · Score: 1

      A gal in an office I used to support would forward *every* copy of *every* hoax to *everybody* in her address book. Every freakin' time. She should be rich by now.

      --
      --- This .sig for sale - $500 OBO.
    23. Re:Hoax?!? by ari_j · · Score: 1

      If you got a letter saying that Wal Mart was testing out their tracking of your postal mail and would give you $50 if you send a letter to each of five friends to that end, wouldn't you wonder for even a split second how and why Wal Mart wants to track your mail?

    24. Re:Hoax?!? by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Oops, reparent this to be an offspring of its sibling.

    25. Re:Hoax?!? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "If you got a letter saying that Wal Mart was testing out their tracking of your postal mail and would give you $50 if you send a letter to each of five friends to that end, wouldn't you wonder for even a split second how and why Wal Mart wants to track your mail?"

      Yep. Harldy relevent to this discussion, though.

      A.) Considerably more work to mail those letters.

      B.) Considerably more personal than sending emails. (knowing your email address doesn't mean knowing how to find you.)

      In this situation, you're no longer at 'knee-jerk-do-it-just-for-fun'. It's more like saying 'yes' to an offer of a blowjob from an attractive woman before asking if she's a prostitute.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    26. Re:Hoax?!? by ari_j · · Score: 2, Informative

      The only chain letter I ever forwarded on was the one wherein you send your wife or girlfriend to the first name on the list and, later, receive some insane number of women. Not because I am a womanizer, but because I like sending people through the mail. ;)

    27. Re:Hoax?!? by eco2geek · · Score: 1
      Don't you think that if Microsoft could make a serious buck off of it, they would implement something that allowed them to track certain bits of mail?

      The point is, every incarnation of this I ever saw (and it's been a while, thankfully) was in plain text, not HTML, with no attachments. Why would anyone think there'd be any way for Microsoft to "track" it?

      Are people that clueless about how email works?

    28. Re:Hoax?!? by wmspringer · · Score: 1

      Apparently, yes.

    29. Re:Hoax?!? by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      I had a lot of my nontechnical friends and family ask me about this when it first went around. They were concerned about the privacy issues. The money issue aside, your snide inside is really unfair, for two reasons:

      No, I don't think so.
      The old maxim really is true:
      If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.

      You don't need to know shit about telephones to know that a random phone call offering to give you thousands of dollars might be a scam. Same for snail mail, or email.
      It's freakin common sense people!

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    30. Re:Hoax?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I bet that by now, your penis is 10 feet long

    31. Re:Hoax?!? by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

      mine uses her Dell laptop with XP Home (her first computer) with no big problems. she can't do much with it... but she can check her golfing stuff online, weather reports and send or receive email. as a side note, her husband (my grandfather) doesn't even know how to turn it on. he is the average anti-change type retired person.

  7. Riiiight... by ray+sedai · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    So I should expect my check in the mail soon?

    --
    This color ends in 'urple.'
  8. Re:Stupid article. by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Jon Katz isn't very sneaky. What an obvious pseudonym!"

    "Also, the author of that Wired article is an idiot."

    (-1, Redundant)

  9. Nice by Mz6 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Would anyone agree with me that this was probably one of the first pieces of hoax (or even spam) mail in general? Perhaps the first was the pyramid scheme... Send $5 to the 5 names on this list, then put your name at the top, remove that last entry, and send it to 5 of your friends.

    This is actually a very well written Wired article. It's interesting to note that it only took him a little bit of research (or so it seems by the article) to find this guy. All he had to do was find the original hoax email, and the guys name was the first on the list! This is what started it all, and every single revision one could think of. It went from Email, to Instant Messaging, people have even started recieving them on their SMS-enabled phones as well. It's amazing to think that there are actually people who still believe this stuff... and it still continues on...amazing.. well atleast amusing to say the least.

    --
    Hmmm.
    1. Re:Nice by StateOfTheUnion · · Score: 1

      I got the Niemen Marcus cookie recipe thing before I ever saw this one . . . not really a hoax per say, but still one of those "send it to everyone you know" emails . . .

    2. Re:Nice by mrneutron · · Score: 2, Informative

      I disagree. Many, many internet hoxes were born before 1997. 'David Rhodes' & MAKE.MONEY.FAST dates to the 80's, many others date from the early 90s. Here's the David Rhodes hoax from Usenet in 1989

    3. Re:Nice by Phoex · · Score: 1

      Maybe one of the earliest incidences of hoax e-mails, but stuff like this has been around for a very long time. I've heard reports of similar chain letters being around before the Revolutionary War. All it really takes is someone speaking authoritatively to get someone somewhere to believe it.

      --
      00110100 00110010
    4. Re:Nice by Otter · · Score: 1
      The Neiman-Marcus cookie recipe was a snail mail and fax chain letter well before widespread email. (And existed in other forms for decades before that.) Probably a lot of similar hoaxes also had a pre-email stage.

      But, yeah, that was the first one I got, also.

    5. Re:Nice by aussie_a · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How do you know the reporter found the correct person? He found SOMEONE who sent A version and CLAIMED to have started it when asked.

    6. Re:Nice by Technician · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's amazing to think that there are actually people who still believe this stuff... and it still continues on...amazing.. well atleast amusing to say the least.


      A lot of people were skeptical. However since it cost nothing to try it.... Better to have tried it becasue if in the remote chance it was true, you wouldn't want to be the one who missed the easy money. That's why it was forwarded so much. If they truly believed it, there would have been many more people lined up in Redmond to collect.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  10. Well that's just great by filtur · · Score: 0, Redundant

    If Bill isn't going to be sending me any money, I guess I'll have to send all my friends emails that they won't get any money either. But I do know this Nigerian General..... Maybe they'd be interested in that.

  11. I hate when people forward me this stuff. by Gldm · · Score: 1

    I usually tell whoever forwarded this to me (as it's usually someone who knows me) that if they keep doing it I'll be forced to block all mail from them. Then they get pissed off. It's like hello, you're being rude! Have some freaking manners already. If people want to forward this stuff to idiots, then fine, but I find it insulting when people who know me think I'd either fall for this lame crap, or actually WANT any of it.

    --

    Introducing the new Occam Fusion! Now with sqrt(-1) fewer blades!

  12. A hoax? by Heghta' · · Score: 0, Redundant

    What? Are you telling me I won't get any money from Bill Gates!
    All those thousands of mails I forwarded for nothing?
    This can not be true!

    --

    Ash nazg durbatulûk, ash nazg gimbatul
    ash nazg thrakatulûk, agh burzum-ishi krimpatul.

  13. Sure it starts out as a joke by Cyberhwk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    These things start off as a joke but they quickly seem to get out of hand. Just today I got a message from someone who I thought was intelligent. She sent the "yahoo will close your account if you don't forward this lengthy message" IM. This seriously gets under my skin as I continually try to convince people that it is a hoax. :'( My friends don't believe me and I need a hug cause I think I'm having a nervous breakdown.

    1. Re:Sure it starts out as a joke by shrewmy · · Score: 0

      A hug?! Sounds like what you need is the new Dashboard Confessional cd and a LiveJournal :)

    2. Re:Sure it starts out as a joke by Cyberhwk · · Score: 3, Funny

      Actually I really need my whomping shovel. Thing is, security seems to get upset when I bring that to work I don't understand why I'm just trying to help people improve themselves. I only use a whomping shovel because some people need more help than others and I can't get my hands on an ICBM or a NIKE missle.

    3. Re:Sure it starts out as a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These things start off as a joke but they quickly seem to get out of hand. Just today I got a message from someone who I thought was intelligent. She sent the "yahoo will close your account if you don't forward this lengthy message" IM. This seriously gets under my skin as I continually try to convince people that it is a hoax. :'( My friends don't believe me and I need a hug cause I think I'm having a nervous breakdown.

      Here's what you need to do.. Engineer a joke e-mail which convinces your friends that they must give you a blow job and forward the e-mail, otherwise something terrible will happen. Next thing you know, you'll be getting 100 blow jobs a day, then in a few months 1000's.. You'll be getting sucked off so often that you won't have enough semen for them all.

    4. Re:Sure it starts out as a joke by stinkyfingers · · Score: 1
      Just today I got a message from someone who I thought was intelligent.

      Just readjust your idea of intelligent. That's what I did, and fewer things annoy me now.

    5. Re:Sure it starts out as a joke by DrEldarion · · Score: 4, Informative

      Snopes usually comes in handy when people are being difficult about believing hoaxes.

      They have a few articles which may help you.

    6. Re:Sure it starts out as a joke by okmnji · · Score: 1
      My friends don't believe me and I need a hug cause I think I'm having a nervous breakdown.

      Naw, you just need a nice handle of vokda.

      And apologies in advance, but:
      In Soviet Russia, vodka drinks you!

    7. Re:Sure it starts out as a joke by Cyberhwk · · Score: 1
      Just readjust your idea of intelligent. That's what I did, and fewer things annoy me now.
      Everyone has been telling me that lately. I've also been told to expect less from people and become more tolerent towards ignorance, stupidity, selfishness, arrogance, ect. Really I don't want to lower my expectations I had so much hope for humanity when I was younger. Now all I can hope for is that they realize its time to run before I can get my whomping shovel out. I consider it a five second head start and I think its fair.
    8. Re:Sure it starts out as a joke by Cyberhwk · · Score: 1
      Naw, you just need a nice handle of vokda
      What is a handle of vodka? How much is a handle? Personally I prefer Coconut rum on ice or in coke served cold but I'm still green on the whole being able to get alcohol legally scene. Until recently I had to try to brew my own. I'm glad I didn't go blind drinking it cause it tasted like swill.
    9. Re:Sure it starts out as a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bukkakemail?

    10. Re:Sure it starts out as a joke by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Wow, you don't get much respect from your friends! Pretty much everyone I know would believe anything I tell them in regards to computers and the internet without even questioning it.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    11. Re:Sure it starts out as a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, way back when snopes was something else (no idea what it was) they had an awesome article that discussed the psychological basis for people forwarding these hoaxes the way they do. I've been trying to find it for some time now, but no luck.

      Anyone?

    12. Re:Sure it starts out as a joke by llywrch · · Score: 1

      > Here's what you need to do.. Engineer a joke e-mail which convinces your friends that they must give you a blow job and
      > forward the e-mail, otherwise something terrible will happen.

      No one would fall for that trick! If there was the slightest possibility that could work, thousands of lonely & desperate guys would be forwarding thousands of copies to friends, strangers, names picked randomly from usenet & web pages, & it would end up becoming over half of all of the email traffic . . .

      Wait a sec. I just described spam as we know it, didn't I?

      Geoff

      --
      I think I see a trend here. Maybe for them it really would be easier to muzzle the entire internet than to produce p
    13. Re:Sure it starts out as a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Really I don't want to lower my expectations I had so much hope for humanity when I was younger."

      So did I. Give yourself time, you'll be researching water hemlock and Socrates too.

  14. In other breaking news... by revery · · Score: 4, Funny

    Respond to this post and get cash (in the form of a Slashdot Subscription)!

    CmdrTaco and Hemos want to test out the latest revision of Slashcode and they need your help. For a limited time only (today) and on a limited number of threads (this post) Slashdot is implementing a post tracking system whereby each person who replies will receive a cash payment (converted into a Slashdot subscription! Hurray!) based on the number of replies posted to your comment. The goal is to stress test how deeply nested responses can be made.

    What are you waiting for? Reply now.

    This post is not associated in anyway with Slashdot. It is merely a poor representation of sarcasm, or irony, or a metaphor about how a beatiful woman is like a fine piece of jade... or something... You won't actually get a subscription to Slashdot and I might lose mine.

    --

    Was it the sheep climbing onto the altar, or the cattle lowing to be slain,
    or the Son of God hanging dead and bloodied on a cross that told me this was a world condemned, but loved and bought with blood.

    1. Re:In other breaking news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha... I have tears... Soo funny... Thank you.

    2. Re:In other breaking news... by aismail3 · · Score: 1

      This makes two levels of nesting :)

    3. Re:In other breaking news... by Zardus · · Score: 1

      Oooh!!! Me! Pay me!

      --
      You can mod your friends, you can mod your nose, but you can't mod your friend's nose.
    4. Re:In other breaking news... by theCat · · Score: 1

      nesting is the key! I am nested deeper! I have the prize!

      --
      =^..^= all your rodent are belong to us
    5. Re:In other breaking news... by evanbd · · Score: 1
      You sad bastard.

      hmm, it went away ;)

      Anyway, it's been done, and yes it broke the site.

    6. Re:In other breaking news... by paul248 · · Score: 1

      Look, it's Level 3 Communications!

    7. Re:In other breaking news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ME ME ME!

    8. Re:In other breaking news... by CSG_SurferDude · · Score: 1

      Nope, you lose!

      With this post, now I'm nested deeper!

      hehehehe

    9. Re:In other breaking news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pop

    10. Re:In other breaking news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I win, I win!!
      free slashdot subscription.
      make it out to anonymous coward

    11. Re:In other breaking news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First!

    12. Re:In other breaking news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just can't help myself. All your AC are belong to us.

    13. Re:In other breaking news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nesting Away!

    14. Re:In other breaking news... by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Thank you for this wonderful opportunity, and a big shoutout to the editors for all their hard work! Now give me my money, dammit!

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    15. Re:In other breaking news... by gr8_phk · · Score: 1

      F*ck it I'm in...

    16. Re:In other breaking news... by nutbarpsycho · · Score: 1

      Sweet! I'm a get me a slashdot subscription! ....what do you mean I won't actually get one? But this post said.......

    17. Re:In other breaking news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Respond to this post and get cash (in the form of a Slashdot Subscription)!

      CmdrTaco and Hemos want to test out the latest revision of Slashcode and they need your help. For a limited time only (today) and on a limited number of threads (this post) Slashdot is implementing a post tracking system whereby each person who replies will receive a cash payment (converted into a Slashdot subscription! Hurray!) based on the number of replies posted to your comment. The goal is to stress test how deeply nested responses can be made.

      What are you waiting for? Reply now.

      This post is not associated in anyway with Slashdot. It is merely a poor representation of sarcasm, or irony, or a metaphor about how a beatiful woman is like a fine piece of jade... or something... You won't actually get a subscription to Slashdot and I might lose mine.

    18. Re:In other breaking news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      poast

    19. Re:In other breaking news... by moondo · · Score: 0

      Hi, ummm, just replying to the post. How much cash is involved in this if I reply? Do I get moded down for this?

    20. Re:In other breaking news... by identity0 · · Score: 1

      If any post deserves a goatse reply, that was it.

      CLICK THIS LINK AND RECIEVE FREE MONEY!!

      The Republic of Slashdonia needs your help! They have a surplus of stupid people, and must get rid of the excess supply before their database crashes from sheer stupidity! Click the above link to take yourself out of the Slashdonian system and learn how to make money on the street off of random strangers! Do it now! The Taco commands you!

      (yes, the above is a joke...)

    21. Re:In other breaking news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Must...nest...deeper.

    22. Re:In other breaking news... by nandhp · · Score: 5, Funny

      While supplies last. Anonymous Coward not eligible. not available in all areas. Subject to credit approval. Internet and communication surcharges may apply in certain areas, including in Alaska. New subscribers only. See store, slashdot.org or printed advertising for details. All names are trademarks or service marks of their respective holders. Copyright (c) 2004 Slashdot, part of the Open Source Development Network (OSDN). All rights reserved. Legal Disclaimer: Done.

    23. Re:In other breaking news... by Mex · · Score: 1

      Wohoo! Free subscription baby!

    24. Re:In other breaking news... by normal_guy · · Score: 1

      I'm deepest!

      --

      Linux: Free if your time is worthless.
    25. Re:In other breaking news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no you're not!

    26. Re:In other breaking news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YOUR A TROLL!

    27. Re:In other breaking news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somebody had to do this.

    28. Re:In other breaking news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      damn myself

    29. Re:In other breaking news... by drkich · · Score: 1

      What if you already have a subscription?

    30. Re:In other breaking news... by Doctor+Crumb · · Score: 1

      First^H^H^H^H^H Deepest Post!

    31. Re:In other breaking news... by sik0fewl · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hmm.. this sounds an awful like a hoax I read about on Wired today, it was linked from slashdot.

      Well, okay, I didn't actually read the article, but I did read the news post about the article.

      Well, okay, I never read all of that either, but I did read enough to to feel I am fully capable of making a decent reply. Anyway, here's the link to the article: http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.07/hoax.html

      --
      I remember when legal used to mean lawful, now it means some kind of loophole. - Leo Kessler
    32. Re:In other breaking news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Deeper! Deeper! Hooray, I cant wait to get cash enough from this post to pay my trip to Nigeria, where Ill finally finish some business and get rich!

    33. Re:In other breaking news... by Java+Ape · · Score: 1

      Ooh! Ooh! Pick me! Pick Me! ;-)

    34. Re:In other breaking news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I don't even have an id :-(

    35. Re:In other breaking news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but money doesn't buy happiness.

    36. Re:In other breaking news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but poverty doesn't buy happiness either. On the other hand, I can always keep a sharp eye out for happiness from the comfort of my new mansion.

    37. Re:In other breaking news... by sharkey · · Score: 1
      a metaphor about how a beatiful woman is like a fine piece of jade... or something...

      No, a woman is like........a refrigerator. They're about six feet tall, 300 pounds.... They make ice and, umm...... No, wait a minute! Actually, a woman is more like a beer. They smell good, they look good, you'd step over your own mother just to get one!

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    38. Re:In other breaking news... by ewanrg · · Score: 1

      Per another posting...

      Yeah, this probably isn't true. But for the price it costs me, why not post just in case? I mean, a Slashdot subscription, that's got to be worth something, right? :-)

    39. Re:In other breaking news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      paaaaay meeee

    40. Re:In other breaking news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is sounding similiar to the porno story all of a sudden.....

    41. Re:In other breaking news... by insensitive_clod · · Score: 1

      just some text so it'll let me post...

    42. Re:In other breaking news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, this is weak... I'm notorious for not reading /. posts for several hours after the story is out (a first post contender, I am not) and this is all the deeper it is!

      Come on people, this is /., home of extremism. I want to see the tabbing on this thread crash IE!

      Okay, fine... I'll show my tits to the poster who posts the 1069 level deep response! :)

    43. Re:In other breaking news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Going deeper underground...

    44. Re:In other breaking news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the parent forgot to mention is, the money mentioned will be forwarded down the chain of postings. Since we all trust each other, I'll take my money in advance from you, and you can get yours from the one on top of you.

    45. Re:In other breaking news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      W00t!

    46. Re:In other breaking news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um, you're a girl right?

    47. Re:In other breaking news... by hools1234 · · Score: 1

      Is my subscribtion transferrable?

      --
      iSnack 2.0 - Download it now to your iToast 9.0
    48. Re:In other breaking news... by Zorak+Man · · Score: 1

      ...how deep can these threads go?

      --

      404 .sig not found
    49. Re:In other breaking news... by mt-biker · · Score: 1

      enquiring minds need to know

    50. Re:In other breaking news... by bad+toast · · Score: 1

      This didn't go nearly as deep as I thought it would...

    51. Re:In other breaking news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can we get it off the edge 1024x768?

    52. Re:In other breaking news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG I'm gonna get like 6 slashdot subscriptions now! LOLOLOL

  15. Mac.. by freaksta · · Score: 5, Funny

    Not to mention that being on a Mac does not disqualify him from recieving the reward money for forwarding his messages. Bill told me so in his last email.

    --


    Hrrm... I usually just sign my name.
  16. Nigeria? by T-Keith · · Score: 5, Funny

    E-mail scams! Wait till my friend from Nigeria hears about this!

    1. Re:Nigeria? by bizpile · · Score: 1

      Hey! Maybe we know the same guy! What a small world.

  17. 1st ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1st person to not received it since 97...

    am i already late or still on time?

  18. Interesting, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do we know *he* was the one to start it?

    1. Re:Interesting, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hardly believe this hoax email is true... never saw it.

      Im starting to feeling that the aproach nowadays is more about foobar and inventing hoax scams to write about...

      "A bottle of SPAM for table 4!"
      " ahhhh the drink of champions!"

  19. some hoaxes are nefarious by WormholeFiend · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I never received much spam until that one day, someone I had emailed ONCE and LONG AGO, who obviously put me in her list of contacts (automatically or not), decided to forward a fake AMBER alert to the hundreds of people in her list, me being one.

    I still rue the day I emailed her.

    1. Re:some hoaxes are nefarious by caswelmo · · Score: 1

      That's what revenge is for. She'll learn. Or not.

    2. Re:some hoaxes are nefarious by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      I think I'll write a cautionary tale about a spammer who sent out so much email to so many people that one day he emailed a flipped out serial killer for whom this email was the final straw. The killer tracked him down and [insert gory death here].

      And then I'll email it to a bunch of people to warn them. And sign it Cowboyneal.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:some hoaxes are nefarious by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      What's even un-funnier, is that I later received CC's from other recipients of the AMBER alert hoax pointing to the Snopes debunk page for that specific case.

      It was like an ever sub-dividing domino-effect from Hell. Chain-email really is the tool of the devil.

    4. Re:some hoaxes are nefarious by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      For one mail? Speaking of intollerance.

    5. Re:some hoaxes are nefarious by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      Yea, she was the contact person at a big corporation, where I sent some customer feedback on a product I used to buy.

    6. Re:some hoaxes are nefarious by JaxWeb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      when someone randomly forwards something to you, without doing a Blind Carbon Copy, your e-mail address can go far-and-wide.

      In Access (To practice for school work, not because I wanted to), I wrote a script which would look through text and find the e-mail address. When given a small sample of e-mails, I found 25,354 e-mail addresses.

      Check it out at http://www.sylviawebster.f2s.com/office/ if you like.

      --
      - Jax
    7. Re:some hoaxes are nefarious by sdo1 · · Score: 1
      decided to forward a fake AMBER alert to the hundreds of people in her list, me being one

      There is exactly one thing to do in this situation, and it's something I just love to do. Just reply/all with a link to an appropriate snopes.com page and explain to EVERYONE they sent it to that it's a hoax and that they should research such things before forwarding them on.

      The result is typicaly a huge amount of embarassment for the sender.

      Of course I did this to my sister and she was none too pleased with me (in fact I'd say that she was downright pissed off that I'd embarassed her in front of all of her friends and family). It worked though. She doesn't send them anymore without checking first.

      -S

      --
      --- What parts of "shall make no law", "shall not be infringed", and "shall not be violated" don't you understand?
  20. Possibility of Spam by artlu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Hoaxes are not just powerful at getting a message across, but they can be amazingly powerful for spammers. Imagine spammers creating hoaxes that go out to 1,000,000 email addresses. Assuming 1% goes through and that each one of those people forwards to another 20 people will allow spammers to distribute a link to some product for free after the first 1,000,000. Also, this will take the legal strain off of the spammers themselves?

    Are any companies currently doing this?

    GroupShares Inc. - A Free and Interactive Stock Market Community

    --
    -------
    artlu.net
    1. Re:Possibility of Spam by mdvolm · · Score: 1

      That's a great idea and all, but don't encourage them!

    2. Re:Possibility of Spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...You mean just like that gawd awful GroupShares spam link you have on your post...?

      Christ, are YOU a spammer?

    3. Re:Possibility of Spam by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      So how is your site, which can be used as a front for pump and dump stock hoaxes, doing?

    4. Re:Possibility of Spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but my Father is considering it as a way to reach all you Slashdot heathens, since you probably won't get His message any other way.

      Get to your local church and tithe now!

      -- J.C.

    5. Re:Possibility of Spam by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      No, but plenty of MLM companies are doing far worse: they're getting millions of people to PAY THEM to advertise their product.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    6. Re:Possibility of Spam by doshell · · Score: 1

      This could be avoided if people were sensible enough to use the Bcc field when sending out an e-mail to multiple, unrelated recipients. Like I do.

      --
      Score: i, Imaginary
  21. Slashdotted and Farked by Apocalypse111 · · Score: 5, Funny

    This site has been both Slashdotted and Farked. I think we need to go inform the IT people at Wired that we offer them our condolences on the loss of their servers. Then again, they probably already know all about the problems, what with that burning smell...

    Maybe they could sell the blackened chunks of silicon that used to be their servers on eBay, make back some of the loss.

    --
    There is no mod option "-1: Disagree" for a reason. "Overrated" is not an acceptable substitute. Post something instead.
    1. Re:Slashdotted and Farked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I though you were going to say you were going to offer them a "protection package" where you could guarantee them no more slashdotting for a friendly stipend dropped off at a certain non-discrept location of your choosing. (Racketeering?)

    2. Re:Slashdotted and Farked by jeffy210 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "...that we offer them our condolences on the loss of their servers."

      Yeah you're right... do you have a link for it?

      --
      ------
      "And may your days be long upon the earth."
  22. My CEO fell for this... by eamacnaghten · · Score: 5, Interesting
    We got this in the Software company I was working with at the time. The laughable thing is that my CEO fell for this, and because he did a VP, the head of Implementation and Training did too then our head of support did to - all forwarding the Email to our customers!

    As you can imagine it did our credibility no good whatsoever.

    It is not just ignorant housewives and naive schoolkids who fall for these hoaxes...

    --

    Web Sig: Eddy Currents

    1. Re:My CEO fell for this... by pilkul · · Score: 1
      That boggles the mind. Didn't any of these people know enough to think that no reports are magically sent to Microsoft when you e-mail someone? (... imagine the privacy implications!) Or have enough elementary business sense to realize that Microsoft won't just send people money for nothing?

      Did the company go down in flames?

    2. Re:My CEO fell for this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wait, how do you know? do you have the source code to Outlook? for all we know it could be sending shit back to MS. (I mean, everyone with a traffic alalyzer knows it doesn't, but still...) Of course, we all know from the Simpsons that Bill doesn't give money out, much less actually BUY the competition out.

    3. Re:My CEO fell for this... by nija · · Score: 1

      It is not just ignorant housewives and naive schoolkids who fall for these hoaxes...

      Ignorant Managment? WTH?!

      /dilbert

    4. Re:My CEO fell for this... by eamacnaghten · · Score: 2, Informative
      That boggles the mind.

      Agreed!

      Didn't any of these people know enough to think that no reports are magically sent to Microsoft when you e-mail someone?

      The CEO of the company was(is) not technical. From memory, what he said was that there was no cost to forwarding the email and a potential (no matter how small) financial gain so why not? - There ended up being a credibility cost of course but that was not high as it turned out.

      The others I think followed in his footsteps to "suck up" to him. Company politics and all

      Did the company go down in flames?

      No - It had (has) a good software product and now I believe no. 1 in it's market! All goes to show....

      --

      Web Sig: Eddy Currents

    5. Re:My CEO fell for this... by kabocox · · Score: 1

      Did the company go down in flames?

      No - It had (has) a good software product and now I believe no. 1 in it's market! All goes to show....


      Oh, no that's even worse, a forward this MS Hoax E-mail and your software will be no. 1 in your niche by mysterious MS means email. It'll take decades to die.

    6. Re:My CEO fell for this... by nortcele · · Score: 2, Funny
      We got this in the Software company I was working with at the time. The laughable thing is that my CEO fell for this...
      Let me guess. You were working for Microsoft?
    7. Re:My CEO fell for this... by stephanruby · · Score: 1
      In my company, an IT support guy fell for it and sent out the email to all our eleven thousand employees. It was about the Jamaican area code hoax.

      I did reply back with a url saying it was a hoax, but i never got a reply back. I suppose he was probably busy for a few days deleting all the replies telling him this was a hoax.

    8. Re:My CEO fell for this... by khallow · · Score: 1
      Oh, no that's even worse, a forward this MS Hoax E-mail and your software will be no. 1 in your niche by mysterious MS means email. It'll take decades to die.

      You mean it's a hoax? But it sounded so sincere!

  23. rule of thumb by mabu · · Score: 5, Informative

    I tell everyone, before they forward any of that crap, or virtually anything they deem worthy of sharing, they should first check it against the Urban Legends Reference Pages.

    1. Re:rule of thumb by JayJay.br · · Score: 1

      I've got another one, maybe just as useful.

      I tell everybody "If you didn't write it, I don't need to read it". Works for social email. Which is from where all that crap comes from anyway.

    2. Re:rule of thumb by amembleton · · Score: 1

      I just copy and paste a sentance from it into Google and see what it spits out. That always works.

    3. Re:rule of thumb by Dog+and+Pony · · Score: 1

      I smell a great Thunderbird extension... ;-)

    4. Re:rule of thumb by mt-biker · · Score: 1

      I send the following, reply-to-all:

      --

      WARNING, CAUTION, DANGER, AND BEWARE!
      Gullibility Virus Spreading over the Internet!

      WASHINGTON, D.C.--The Institute for the Investigation of Irregular Internet Phenomena announced today that many Internet users are becoming infected by a new virus that causes them to believe without question every groundless story, legend, and dire warning that shows up in their inbox or on their browser. The Gullibility Virus, as it is called, apparently makes people believe and forward copies of silly hoaxes relating to cookie recipes, email viruses, taxes on modems, and get-rich-quick schemes.

      "These are not just readers of tabloids or people who buy lottery tickets based on fortune cookie numbers," a spokesman said. "Most are otherwise normal people, who would laugh at the same stories if told to them by a stranger on a streetcorner." However, once these same people become infected with the Gullibility Virus, they believe anything they read on the Internet.

      "My immunity to tall tales and bizarre claims is all gone," reported one weeping victim. "I believe every warning message and sick child story my friends forward to me, even though most of the messages are anonymous."

      Another victim, now in remission, added, "When I first heard about "the sulfnbk.exe virus" and Good Times, I just accepted it without question. After all, there were dozens of other recipients on the mail header, so I thought the virus must be true." It was a long time, the victim said, before she could stand up at a Hoaxees Anonymous meeting and state, "My name is Jane, and I've been hoaxed." Now, however, she is spreading the word. "Challenge and check whatever you read," she says.

      Internet users are urged to examine themselves for symptoms of the virus, which include the following:

      The willingness to believe improbable stories without thinking the urge to forward multiple copies of such stories to others a lack of desire to take three minutes to check to see if a story is true T. C. is an example of someone recently infected. He told one reporter, "I read on the Net that the major ingredient in almost all shampoos makes your hair fall out, so I've stopped using shampoo." When told about the Gullibility Virus, T. C. said he would stop reading email, so that he would not become infected.

      Anyone with symptoms like these is urged to seek help immediately. Experts recommend that at the first feelings of gullibility, Internet users rush to their favorite search engine and look up the item tempting them to thoughtless credence. Most hoaxes, legends, and tall tales have been widely discussed and exposed by the Internet community. Courses in critical thinking are also widely available, and there is online help from many sources, including:

      Department of Energy Computer Incident Advisory Capability at
      http://www.ciac.org/ciac/

      Symantec/Anti Virus Research Center at
      http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/index.html

      McAfee Associates Virus Hoax List
      http://vil.nai.com/VIL/hoaxes.asp

      The Urban Legends Web Site
      http://www.urbanlegends.com/ulz/

      Urban Legends Reference Pages
      http://www.snopes.com

      Datafellows Hoax Warnings
      http://www.f-secure.com/virus-info/hoax/

      Those people who are still symptom free can help inoculate themselves against the Gullibility Virus by reading some good material on sources, such as:

      Evaluating Internet Research Sources
      http://www.virtualsalt.com/evalu8it.htm

      Evaluation of Information Sources
      http://www.vuw.ac.nz/~agsmith/evaln/evaln .htm

      Lastly, as a public service, Internet users can help stamp out the Gullibility Virus by sending copies of this message to anyone who forwards them a hoax.

      This message is so important, we're sending it anonymously! Forward it to all your friends right away! Don't think about it! This is not a chain letter! This story is true! Don't check it out!

  24. free wired subscription to prevent /.ing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    free wired subscription (as seen on slickdeals.net).

  25. Re:Stupid article. by gmuslera · · Score: 0

    Yes, like the Jim Caveziel pseudonym of Jesus Christ , i wonder how such intelligent people choose so obvious aliases :)

  26. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by Troed · · Score: 5, Informative

    Of course it didn't concern me because I read my email with pine

    Pine Message/External-Body Type Attribute Buffer Overflow Vulnerability [Sep 10, 2003]

    Pine From: Field Buffer Overflow Vulnerability [Sep 23, 2000]

    Pine 4.x Remote Command Execution Vulnerability [Jun 28, 1999]

  27. I got one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hate those hoax warnings, but this one is important! Send this
    > > warning to everyone on your e-mail list!
    > >
    > > If someone comes to your front door saying they are conducting a survey
    > > and asks you to take your clothes off, do not do it! This is a scam;
    > > they only want to see you naked.
    > >
    > > I wish I'd gotten this yesterday. I feel so stupid and cheap now....

    1. Re:I got one by Barumpus · · Score: 1

      Ahh yes, but I feel real good about it. One piece of advice though. Thry some sit ups, they could help with those handles you have.

  28. Now we know who is responsible by Timesprout · · Score: 1

    Someone take him outside and give him a kicking for the irritation he caused.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  29. What a crappy joke! by theJerk242 · · Score: 0

    'It was just a joke between a couple friends''
    Because of that travesty of a joke, the everyone in the world is getting this stuff their e-mail (along with the other huge amounts of spam). Bryan Mack ought to give an appology to the world. And NOT in the form of an e-mail! After all, just look at what happened to his "joke".

    --
    Red Bull gave me wings and I flew into the ceiling fan.
  30. I think they got the wrong guy by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I can remember recieving this on Usenet! Long before 1997. Circa 1992 or so. I think they got the wrong guy. He may have started one, but the incarnation of this joke was FAR earlier.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    1. Re:I think they got the wrong guy by T'hain+Esh+Kelch · · Score: 1, Funny

      Im not sure Bill Gates was as widely known back then... So I think your memory has gotten /.'ed!

    2. Re:I think they got the wrong guy by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Oh, he was well known- after all, he sold his first program, Altair Basic, in 1973. Microsoft itself was quite the large corporation already by 1980, when it launched MS-Dos, the hardware-independant version of PC-Dos. Heck, the first version of Windows was released in the late 1980s (note I didn't say the first USEFULL version, which wouldn't come until 1993, or the first USEABLE version, which we're still waiting for).

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    3. Re:I think they got the wrong guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't remember what evil empire was implicated, but I remember taking end user ISP calls on this variety of hoax in mid 1996.

    4. Re:I think they got the wrong guy by IntlHarvester · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'll back you up -- I recall getting versions of this email back in 1991-2, and seeing it frequently on corporate mail systems 1993-96.

      There was also a Disney version, and Nordstroms or someone. Even if the guy did write the email, it wasn't a very new idea by 1997.

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    5. Re:I think they got the wrong guy by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Thank you. It may be that I've misremembered and Gates himself wasn't implicated before 97- but the whole "forward this e-mail for money" chain letter hoax had been around for quite some time.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  31. Legal danger? by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    As with spam and scams and mail virus, this guy is not in some sort of danger for starting a mail hoax? If not, er... should be?

    1. Re:Legal danger? by reidbold · · Score: 1
      Brilliant. Absolutely fucking brilliant. Let's start charging people criminally for sending email to their friends.
      At first he just sent it to a few friends, but those friends sent it to other friends

      --
      -Reid
    2. Re:Legal danger? by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      In danger? for what? Geek justice?

    3. Re:Legal danger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's his version of the story. Someone somewhere deliberately sent it to someone who wouldn't get the joke.

  32. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by jawtheshark · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I stand corrected. Well since it was the University server I was using to read my email, I just have to assume that they knew what they were doing.

    Has anyone ever used these exploits to write a (Unix) virus?

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  33. Posted as AC to avoid humiliation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Raise your hand if you felt a glimmer of hope upon reading the headline... [sigh]

    1. Re:Posted as AC to avoid humiliation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because if it's posted on Slashdot, it can't be a hoax.

  34. Re:I hate when people forward me this stuff. by sindarin2001 · · Score: 1

    Not to mention the fact that most people don't understand that when you forward to a bunch of people (unless you use bcc), your email, along with everybody elses gets attached to that email. That email is then forwarded from person to person, collecting addresses...when finally it ends up at a spammer. Hm...wonder what they'd do with 1500 email addresses??

  35. Not as bad... by scoser · · Score: 1

    ...as the virus hoax forwards that have ignorant people deleting semi-vital Windows files that they are told are "steeling you're CREEDIT CARD NUMBERS!!!!!!!"

  36. Ahm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want my subscription, please reply to my post.

    1. Re:Ahm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there yo go

      balls

  37. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by Sfing_ter · · Score: 5, Funny

    really, I mean jdbmgr.exe anyone? Look for the bear!!!

    And who would be stupid enough to believe a software company would make executables launch from within the email, or for that matter the header? What kind of buffoon software would ever do that...??? :)

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. Emo Philips
  38. $5 for jail by enforcer999 · · Score: 1

    I ended up prosecuting a guy who kept sending out the $5 pyramid scheme emails. He pissed too many people off with his spam. Needless to say, he has quit this profession. BTW, he did not make very much money off of it. Yeah I know, DUMB CROOK. Those are the only ones we catch.

  39. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by techno-vampire · · Score: 1
    What I thought to be impossible had suddenly become a reality.

    Welcome to the future. Back in the '40s, Heinlein wrote Space Cadet. On the first page, a phone rings while hanging from the hero's belt. As he answers the call, he's watching a monorail arrive. Futuristic then, commonplace today. We have seen the future, and it is now!

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
  40. If I really had a system to track e-mails by Colonel+Cholling · · Score: 1

    I'd use it to hunt down and kill all the people who forward me this crap.

    --

    I am Sartre of the Borg. Existence is futile.
  41. textfile.vbs by underpar · · Score: 1

    Can someone track down the dude that sends me viruses via e-mail with cute names like txt.exe? It's really adorable.

    1. Re:textfile.vbs by Mz6 · · Score: 1
      "Can someone track down the dude that sends me viruses via e-mail with cute names like txt.exe? It's really adorable."

      Sure, but I'll need your email address first :)

      --
      Hmmm.
    2. Re:textfile.vbs by NIK282000 · · Score: 1

      I think its the same guy who sends me "IMPORTANT.bat" and "YourDocument.exe". I think if you open any of those you should become steril so you will not spoil the gene pool further.

      --
      Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
  42. Simpson's quote by bcattwoo · · Score: 1
    Getting that email reminded me of the scene where Bill Gates "buys out" Homer's internet company.

    "I didn't get this rich by writing a lot of checks"

  43. A simple rule by Dracolytch · · Score: 1

    A simple rule I teach all my friends/family/users:

    If an e-mail asks you to forward it to anyone: Don't.

    They're like human-propigated computer virii, written by social engineers who don't know how to program.

    --
    This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
  44. Ah, the memories by grunt107 · · Score: 1

    I have gotten the Gates email dozens of times - mainly each time my friends/family join the 'Net gen. I even have a canned reply email (from the 2nd time I got one) for these newbies explaining why these companies would not do this. What I have noticed in the last couple years is the proliferation of the 'echain', where I must send 1 to at least 10. I do forward some of these if they are a nice message or would hurt the original sender if I did not send them back (I know - WUSS), but I refuse to clog the wires with the "Fwd to at least 10 people or you'll DIE" letters.

    1. Re:Ah, the memories by cuzality · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of a canned reply I used years ago on those mailing lists idiots always sending their "unsub" requests to the list address instead of the admin address:

      "First, ask your Internet Provider to mail you an Unsubscribing Kit. Then follow the directions.

      The kit will most likely be the standard no-fault type. Depending on requirements, System A and/or System B can be used. When operating System A, depress lever and a plastic dalkron unsubscriber will be dispensed through the slot immediately underneath. When you have fastened the adhesive lip, attach connection marked by the large 'X' outlet hose. Twist the silver-colored ring one inch below the connection point until you feel it lock.

      The kit is now ready for use.

      The Cin-Eliminator is activated by the small switch on the lip. When securing, twist the ring back to its initial condition, so that the two orange lines meet. Disconnect. Place the dalkron unsubscriber in the vacuum receptacle to the rear. Activate by pressing the blue button. The controls for System B are located on the opposite side. The red release switch places the Cin-Eliminator into position; it can be adjusted manually up or down by pressing the blue manual release button. The opening is self-adjusting. To secure after use, press the green button, which simultaneously activates the evaporator and returns the Cin-Eliminator to its storage position.

      You may log off if the green exit light is on over the evaporator. If the red light is illuminated, one of the Cin-Eliminator requirements has not been properly implemented. Press the "List Guy" call button on the right of the evaporator . He will secure all facilities from his control panel.

      To use the Auto-Unsub, first undress and place all your clothes in the clothes rack. Put on the velcro slippers located in the cabinet immediately below. Enter the shower, taking the entire kit with you. On the control panel to your upper right upon entering you will see a "Shower seal" button. Press to activate. A green light will then be illuminated immediately below. On the intensity knob, select the desired setting. Now depress the Auto-Unsub activation lever. Bathe normally. The Auto-Unsub will automatically go off after three minutes unless you activate the "Manual off" override switch by flipping it up. When you are ready to leave, press the blue "Shower seal" release button. The door will open and you may leave. Please remove the velcro slippers and place them in their container.

      If you prefer the ultrasonic log-off mode, press the indicated blue button. When the twin panels open, pull forward by rings A & B. The knob to the left, just below the blue light, has three settings, low, medium or high. For normal use, the medium setting is suggested. After these settings have been made, you can activate the device by switching to the "ON" position the clearly marked red switch. If during the unsubscribing operation, you wish to change the settings, place the "manual off" override switch in the "OFF" position. You may now make the change and repeat the cycle. When the green exit light goes on, you may log off and have lunch. Please close the door behind you."

  45. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by AndroidCat · · Score: 5, Funny

    When they can r00t my QVT-102 terminal, I'll be impressed! (Especially since it's in the box in the basement right now.)

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  46. Re:I hate when people forward me this stuff. by npistentis · · Score: 1

    admittedly, I temporarily filtered all email from my mother for this very reason. Once she promised to stop sending me crap, I removed the filter, and all was well.

    --
    Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room!
  47. Re:Stupid article. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you are an idiot, or have 0 sense of humor, or a complete snob. pick your favourite!

  48. From the dept. of or not... by FirstNoel · · Score: 1



    Or not..

    --
    "Hmm. I am to metaphor cheese as metaphor cheese is to transitive verb crackers!"
  49. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 4, Funny
    I don't have that file. I got an email that told me to delete it, so I did. So far so .~ ^.8 . ++++[carrier lost]

    --
    "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
  50. Excuse Me by 4of12 · · Score: 1

    It was just a joke between a couple friends' that eventually got out of hand.

    That's what you think.

    All of your supposedly rational analysis cannot sway my faith in the sacred writ. "And it will come to pass that Gates shall recognize his pre-ordained duty to greatness and cut checks to the faithful forwarders."

    There's even a prophetic passage in the original email alluding to a naysayer arising and ultimately meeting an untimely demise on a skateboard passing through a flock of pigeons.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  51. When I get this email... by Gribflex · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When this guy got the email, he sent an email to everyone previous asking if they had received any money.

    When I used to get this email, I'd send an email to everyone previous asking them to not send stupid emails to every person in their address book. Usually I accompany it with:

    - a brief explanation as to why it's stupid (the AOL/Intel/MS merger being unlikely)

    - why there's no way they will get any money (MS is a business, not a charity)

    - some basic math (do the financial return through three iterations - you, the guy who sent it to you, and the guy who sent it to him - assuming that you each sent it to precisely 20 people, then the guy who sent it to the guy who sent it to you will gain over $2-million)

    - a request that they don't jam up the internet with more spam. The more people who send stupid emails, the more stupid emails in people's inbox, and the more traffic travelling through the mailservers.

    - a caution about mass forwarding other people's email addresses ( if you hit forward, then everyone you forward it to gets my email address, unless you were smart enough to BCC it - that's likely hundreds or thousands of people that now have my email address... where before the number was less than a hundred)

    Usually, I am able to send this 'educational' email to more than a hundred people at a time (due to everyone forwarding without using bcc).

    I try to keep the tone stern, but not insulting. The idea is to make people feel stupid for being a part of the chain letter, not to insult them.

    The end result: I don't get this email anymore.

    In fact, I get less junk mail in general, and so do the people one iteration before me. By making the people who send me junk mail feel stupid for sending it, I've made them stop sending it.

    1. Re:When I get this email... by DrJonesAC2 · · Score: 1

      I would like a copy of the email you send out so that I can do the same. I would write one myself but it seems you have had some time to put together an informative and well written email and there is no sense in reinventing the wheel.

    2. Re:When I get this email... by lrucker · · Score: 1
      Lucky you. I did the same - Mom forwarded me something her friend had sent (one of those "police alert" hoaxes). I sent Mom and her friend a pointer to the Snopes page on links. Friend thanked me, saying she'd be sure to check that out before she mailed anything else - then added me to her wide-open cc list for the next hoax she fell for!

      I bounced her mail to get off her list (she obviously being too clueless for a simple "don't mail me!" to work) but the damage was done - my guess is she or one of the other people on the list caught a virus which added my address to a spammer's list, because my formerly spam-free account (which has never been posted online or used for any registration) started getting spam.

    3. Re:When I get this email... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You don't have many friends, do you? I'm sure your former friends really appreciate the fact that you only want to make them feel stupid, not insult them.

    4. Re:When I get this email... by Gribflex · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but the last time I sent out "that email" was several years ago. I checked my email history, but I don't seem to have a copy. If you do write one of your own, please post it here so we call can benefit.

      Perhaps you can take this fellows suggestion as well and link to some common myth busting websites.

      I often do this with virus scams (reply to the person that sent me the false information with a link to Norton's website, and instructions on how to look up a hoax), and I find that it works really well. Most people are appreciative of knowing how to find out this info for themselves.

    5. Re:When I get this email... by szilagyi · · Score: 1

      You guys are too nice. I had to mail-bomb my sister mercilessly to get the message across.

      Your computer-illiterate friends and relatives don't know how to delete hundreds of emails at once, even if they're all identical. (Well, this was true a few years ago.) A one-line cron job can immobilize them for an hour or more while using less total space and bandwidth than the smallest Microsoft Office document.

      I suppose a well placed goatse.cx link would do the trick, too.

  52. What about Jessica? by LukePieStalker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What about Jessica Mydek and her dying wish to clog as many email servers as she could before cancer takes her? Won't you help? (P.S. Try saying her name three times fast.)

  53. Mail exploits led to the Morris worm by tepples · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Has anyone ever used these exploits to write a (Unix) virus?

    I'm not sure about Pine, but Yes, mailer exploits did lead to a UNIX worm.

    1. Re:Mail exploits led to the Morris worm by jawtheshark · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I indeed know about the Morris worm (who doesn't? ;-)) I meant more exploits in the style that are common with mail readers. I've never heard of any that was possible on a Unix machine. I'm not saying that they don't exist. I'm crossing my fingers.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    2. Re:Mail exploits led to the Morris worm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe anyone who knows how to do it is wisely keeping their mouth shut about it ;)

    3. Re:Mail exploits led to the Morris worm by Felinoid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't think that was e-mail.

      Just going from memory that infected a system as soon as the packet hit the system. It used a flaw in the BSD kernel not in an e-mail client.

      This way when the worm hit firewalls it would infect same and keep going. It's more like blaster in that all it takes to be reinfected is to plug the box back into the Internet. So searching for a bugfix was futile.
      But it was VERY effective. If you cleanned a blaster infected machine you might be able to download the patch before getting infected again. The Morris worm however would hit you right away giving you no hope of getting help leaving you to fend for yourself as best you can.

      Also the Windows blaster could be thwarted by turnning off Decom services in BSD there wasn't an eqivlent service to shut off. Your just screwed.

      The only thing you can really say about this that sounds positive twords Unix is that even with being cut off everyone was able to get down and fix it themselfs where as with Blaster nobody actually had to do that.

      That and there was never a Morris 2.

      --
      I don't actually exist.
    4. Re:Mail exploits led to the Morris worm by Dick+Faze · · Score: 1
      From one of the first hits at the above link: "The program took advantage of a hole in the debug mode of the Unix sendmail program

      Not that I don't appreciate a BSD is sick/broken/dead Troll as much as the next guy.....

    5. Re:Mail exploits led to the Morris worm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      sendmail isn't a mail client. It's a mail transport agent. That's quite a big difference.

  54. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by waterford0069 · · Score: 1
    back in the day we got email hoaxes stating there was a new virus that could be triggered by just opening the email. Back then we laughed with those pranks because we knew it was impossible. I kept laughing, until the day it really happened.

    Which one would that be? As far as I know, all the email viruses required the user to actually open the attachment.

  55. I even remember by Pope+Raymond+Lama · · Score: 1

    A site with a javascript automathic hoax - text generator.

    I rememeber putting together the most absurd hoax I could, translate it back and forth from English to other languages in babelfish, prefixing each line with a random number of "> > >" pasting it on my e-mail program, and sending it to a jokes list.

    It got the "joke of the week" mention on the list quite easily.

    --
    -><- no .sig is good sig.
  56. Err...wrong university by thephotoman · · Score: 1

    The article states that Brian Mack, the creator of the hoax, was a student at Iowa State University, not the University of Houston. It was a UH student that was the first reciepient. Mind, there's a big difference between the two schools. Having gone from Houston to points farther north than Ames on I-35 (stopping there for lunch, as that's normally the time I get to Ames), I should know. However, my parents would be amused, as am I. They graduated from ISU in 1976, and I am currently an undergrad at UH.

    --
    Haec merda tauri est. Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
  57. Nesting instinct.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nesting away..

    1. Re:Nesting instinct.. by lpp · · Score: 1

      Indeed, but I believe I'm more of a sad bastard than you all.

    2. Re:Nesting instinct.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do I get my free subscription?

  58. Star War Episode VI - Return of the Hoaxer by rufu · · Score: 2, Funny

    Only now at the end, young Hoaxer, do you fully comprehend the POWER of the dark-side/Internet.

    1. Re:Star War Episode VI - Return of the Hoaxer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better Yet ... Star Trek .. the returns of Hoshi aka : Hoaxie ...

  59. You sad bastard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, does slashcode break too?

  60. finally.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I view this as no different than spamming. Regardless of its intent, joke or not - some responsibility must be taken by the initial sender. If I was to create a 'gag' virus for me and my friends .. that got "outta controll" .. would I be responsibile? You bet i would.

    Granted, this does not spread on its own .. However, it might as well, as it replicates itself by preying on an obvious ignorence of the recipient.

    Lost man hours explaining 'its a hoax', extra cycles to toss mail, extra disk space, more packet traffic .. all very minimal on their own. But over a 7 year period this adds up.

    Make the mother f-cker pay.

  61. Gates Liable. by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1

    On May 12, 2003, the honorable Beauford T. Justice found William Gates and Microsoft Corporation jointly liable for $49,035.29, inclusive of pre-judgment interest, for breach of contract. Whereas Gates, acting on behalf of Microsoft employed the plaintiffs to test Microsoft's new e-mail tracking program.

    1. Re:Gates Liable. by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Someone really ought to impeach the Honorable Beauford T. Justice. I disagree with almost every decision he makes, and I'm convinced he has an alias of Donald Thompson. ;)

  62. Here's hoping. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    **posting again bwahahaha**

    1. Re:Here's hoping. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More nesting googness

    2. Re:Here's hoping. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blahblahblah

    3. Re:Here's hoping. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How deep the rabit hole goes....

    4. Re:Here's hoping. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (in the worst William shatner voice)
      must...
      resist...
      urge...
      to...
      jump.. .
      on...
      bandwagon...

    5. Re:Here's hoping. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Deeper and Deeper

    6. Re:Here's hoping. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yarr!

    7. Re:Here's hoping. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bent my wookie

    8. Re:Here's hoping. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And deeper?

    9. Re:Here's hoping. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, deeper...

    10. Re:Here's hoping. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and den?

    11. Re:Here's hoping. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yes yes yes baby DEEPER!

    12. Re:Here's hoping. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      time to quack this code open

    13. Re:Here's hoping. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that what she said?

    14. Re:Here's hoping. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello.

    15. Re:Here's hoping. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and again..

    16. Re:Here's hoping. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't believe I am contributing

    17. Re:Here's hoping. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me neither

    18. Re:Here's hoping. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My cat's breath smells like catfood.

    19. Re:Here's hoping. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is Slashdot finally going to get Slashdotted?

    20. Re:Here's hoping. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have we reached the bottom?

    21. Re:Here's hoping. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt it.

    22. Re:Here's hoping. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't know Howard Dean reads /.!

    23. Re:Here's hoping. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you?

    24. Re:Here's hoping. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does Magic 8 ball say? "Outlook not so good" Damn - it really does tell the truth!

  63. I fell for it too.... by suman28 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I sent it to the president & CEO of IBM (where I was working at the time), and my VP and a whole lot of other executives and co-workers. I was only fortunate that the guy that had the authority to fire me was on vacation at the time. oh. the stupidity

    1. Re:I fell for it too.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its understandable -- you're retarded.

  64. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    Does Seattle still have the monorail that came with the Space Needle? Besides, Dick Tracy had wrist phones in the 1930's. Heinlein being Heinlein, I'm surprised that he didn't predict ring-tones, but perhaps this was a later future where they were no longer a big deal.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  65. Reading Comprehension by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's some help for our friend "Iphtashu Fitz": Mack went to Iowa State.

    1. Re:Reading Comprehension by radishthegreat · · Score: 1
      That's only fitting. After all, Iowa State is where the first digital electronic computer was invented!

      ISU also holds the world record for the largest Rice Krispie Treat.

  66. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by MikeXpop · · Score: 1

    My mom got hit with the jdbmgr.exe one. I thought it was pretty clever, but really harmless. Anyone who would use that app (it has something to do with programing java) would be smart enough to not be affected by it.

    Now my mom checks snopes.com for everything.

    --
    Etiquette is etiquette. He kills his mother but he can't wear grey trousers.
  67. His own words? by magarity · · Score: 1

    In Mack's own words: 'It was just a joke ... and Mack said...

    Magarity doesn't like it when people talk about themselfs in the third person. It really annoys magarity.

  68. hmmm. I know that company. by Libertarian_Geek · · Score: 3, Funny

    Oddly enough, it's Microsoft

    --

    www.facebook.com/DareDefendOurRights

    www.fairtax.org
  69. Re:I hate when people forward me this stuff. by pilkul · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Nah, I think it's better to just live with them. It won't accomplish anything to dash off angry messages to your acquaintances --- it's just more rudeness on your part. I think it's better to be a bit forgiving of these things. They aren't as tech-savvy as you and usually mean well. How hard is it really for you to delete a nonsense chain-letter now and then from an acquaintance?

  70. Gullibility Virus Warning by starphish · · Score: 3, Funny
    My favorite...

    WASHINGTON, D.C.--The Institute for the Investigation of Irregular Internet Phenomena announced today that many Internet users are becoming infected by a new virus that causes them to believe without question every groundless story, legend, and dire warning that shows up in their inbox or on their browser. The Gullibility Virus, as it is called, apparently makes people believe and forward copies of silly hoaxes relating to cookie recipes, email viruses, taxes on modems, and get-rich-quick schemes.

    "These are not just readers of tabloids or people who buy lottery tickets based on fortune cookie numbers," a spokesman said. "Most are otherwise normal people, who would laugh at the same stories if told to them by a stranger on a street corner." However, once these same people become infected with the Gullibility Virus, they believe anything they read on the Internet.

    "My immunity to tall tales and bizarre claims is all gone," reported one weeping victim. "I believe every warning message and sick child story my friends forward to me, even though most of the messages are anonymous."

    Another victim, now in remission, added, "When I first heard about Good Times, I just accepted it without question. After all, there were dozens of other recipients on the mail header, so I thought the virus must be true." It was a long time, the victim said, before she could stand up at a Hoaxees Anonymous meeting and state, "My name is Jane, and I've been hoaxed." Now, however, she is spreading the word. "Challenge and check whatever you read," she says.

    Internet users are urged to examine themselves for symptoms of the virus, which include the following:

    the willingness to believe improbable stories without thinking the urge to forward multiple copies of such stories to others a lack of desire to take three minutes to check to see if a story is true T. C. is an example of someone recently infected. He told one reporter, "I read on the Net that the major ingredient in almost all shampoos makes your hair fall out, so I've stopped using shampoo." When told about the Gullibility Virus, T. C. said he would stop reading email, so that he would not become infected. Anyone with symptoms like these is urged to seek help immediately. Experts recommend that at the first feelings of gullibility, Internet users rush to their favorite search engine and look up the item tempting them to thoughtless credence. Most hoaxes, legends, and tall tales have been widely discussed and exposed by the Internet community.

    --
    Yeah, yeah, yeah. The story is a dupe, the topic is boring, the facts weren't checked. WE GET IT!!
    1. Re:Gullibility Virus Warning by vinit79 · · Score: 1

      You forgot the : Please share this email with all your friends and you could save a life.

  71. Revenge anyone? by Gudlyf · · Score: 1
    More information on the subject here.

    No doubt his email addresses no longer work, but there they are.

    --
    Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
  72. Use this for good, not evil. by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

    I wonder if there's any way to get a chain letter like this which would persuade people to write a letter to congress protesting the DMCA... ... it'd be more believable if you ask folks to BCC the letter to some junk yahoo e-mail box for 'tracking purposes.'

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    1. Re:Use this for good, not evil. by dk.r*nger · · Score: 1

      I hope you're kidding, however:

      Not good: Bad.

      This would be bad for the anti-DMCA community, in excatly the same way MyDoom was bad for the Linux community.

  73. daria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forward this email to 10 people you know and trust. If you follow these instructions, within 7 days you will have 10 fewer friends.

  74. Hey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where in the hell is my money damn it!!

  75. fascinating by Surt · · Score: 1

    I remember when I first received a copy of this email from my friend back in 96. I thought it was hilarious. I always wondered who came up with it.
    It's pretty neat they were able to back track it after all this time.

    --
    "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    1. Re:fascinating by pe1chl · · Score: 2, Informative

      Even neater after you read that it was created on November 18, 1997!

    2. Re:fascinating by Surt · · Score: 1

      You got me, I left out the ;-)

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  76. It's not this guy... by AssProphet · · Score: 0

    Seriously who else could it be but Al Gore.
    Everyone knows he's the ultimate internet pioneer!

  77. Me too. by irokitt · · Score: 1

    Ditto. I've blocked friends-of-friends who have gotten my address somehow-they go right into the spam folder. Usually, being polite helps-I kindly tell people that I've probably seen everything they think is "funny", that I probably saw it for the first time in 1994 when they didn't even know the Internet existed, and that I didn't mind them sending me stuff as long as it was truly original, new, or funny. And I still get the odd funny e-mail I haven't seen, but most of my friends just learned to leave me alone.

    One interesting way to get the goat of someone who's sending obnoxious e-mails is to calmly send them an e-mail containing their IP address, their e-mail client, the list of servers their e-mail passed through, and their operating system type. For some reason, that usually scares them away;)

    --
    If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
  78. Re:Bryan's e-mail address by Glowing+Fish · · Score: 2, Interesting

    He started it as a joke.

    And he didn't mean anything malicious by it.

    He isn't anymore guilty than millions of other people who passed it on.

    If he didn't do it, someone else would have.

    --
    Hopefully I didn't put any [] around my words.
  79. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    Outlook and OE, which would run VB script automatically in the preview window or when the email was opened.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  80. Meanwhile, down the hall... by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Some genius was inventing indentation by use of the > symbol. Little did he know that we'd all be surfing greater-than "waves" for the next millenium and a half.
    >
    > >
    > > >
    > > > >
    > > > > >surf's up!
    > > > >
    > > >
    > >
    >

    --
    stuff |
    1. Re:Meanwhile, down the hall... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Actually, if you're going to surf a wave, you catch it like this:

      >
      >>
      >>>
      >>>>
      >>>>>
      >>>>
      >>>
      >>
      > surf's up!

      And make sure you're paddling like hell.

  81. Let's try it by scaaven · · Score: 1

    Reply to this post and you'll receive good luck and $1000!!!

    --
    I know I'm going to be modded up on this
    1. Re:Let's try it by vinit79 · · Score: 1

      Really !! its true . I am a lawyer and you can sue slashdot if u are not lucky after replying to the post. Also the $1000 is taxabale so you need to pay $104.30 in federal taxes. Just be careful that you are not indicted for tax evasion. Anyway I am buying a new Ferrari with all the money I got for replying to this post.

    2. Re:Let's try it by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I'm ready for my $1000! Even though you're a total stranger, I trust you completely. If you want me to, I'll give you my bank account #, SSN, Mom's maiden name, and a notarized power of attorney so you can deposit the money in my account!

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  82. $203.15 by relluf · · Score: 0

    Sorry, how do I claim my $203.15? Thanks!

  83. Lucky him. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When the revolution comes, this guy will be first against the wall.

  84. I got my friend back by Washizu · · Score: 3, Funny

    I got the Bill Gates email from a friend around Thanksgiving of 1997. We made fun of my him for sending it around, but he reasoned "it's probably not true, but it's worth the 2 seconds to send it in case it is."

    So when I got back to school after Thanksgiving break I forged the headers in my email to write a message "from" Bill Gates to my friend. The message thanked him for participating in the study and gave him instructions for collecting his $1000. All he had to do was send a self addressed stamped envelope to Microsoft with a letter containing his name and a confirmation number.

    Over a year passed by and I never brought it up to my friend. I think it was around Christmas of '98 when we were all home again from college and hanging out when someone brought up the Bill Gates email hoax.

    My friend said, "Did I ever tell you guys what happened with that? I got an email saying I won the money, so I followed the instructions and sent back a self addressed stamped envelope, but Microsoft just sent the envelope back to me. I guess it wasn't real, but it was worth the 37 cents just in case it was real."

    I finally told him what happened after I laughed for about ten minutes.

    --
    OddManIn: A Game of guns and game theory.
    1. Re:I got my friend back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is obviously a hoax.

      Postage didn't cost 37 cents in 1998.

    2. Re:I got my friend back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Postage was 32 cents back then until January 10th 1999. Your friend certainly sent the letter with extra postage. Or perhaps you made the story up?

      http://www.nonprofitmailers.org/tools/ratecomp.h tm

    3. Re:I got my friend back by WordUpCousin · · Score: 1

      Your friend should have saved 5 cents and paid for a 32 cent stamp!

    4. Re:I got my friend back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not that i don't think it is a made up storry, but who remembers what the postage rates were in 1998?

      also wouldn't it have cost double the rate also? unless i am missing something it should have taken 2 stamps. one on the self addressed envolope, and another on whatever you used to send the self addressed envolope.

      so adjusting for postage at the time it should have cost 64 cents not just 32

    5. Re:I got my friend back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny as hell. But think about it this way, your mate is one of those risk takers who has the right attitude but stupid basic observations. One day he's gonna drive along your street in some posh new motor
      dripping in gold bling and say "I won bigtime, some guy gave me a tip and it was worth it just in case it was real".
      When that happens don;t forget to remind him about the Bill Gates letter again to shut him up.

    6. Re:I got my friend back by Washizu · · Score: 1

      My response to all the hoax accusations...

      Yeah, the postage was different. I didn't feel like looking up what the rates were in 97.

      The quotes from me and my friend are very close, but obviously I can't remember the exact wording of our conversations.

      Other than that the story is 100% freakin' true. In fact, he just got married on Saturday and I was the best man in his wedding.

      --
      OddManIn: A Game of guns and game theory.
    7. Re:I got my friend back by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1

      You should've requested a $19.95 "processing fee". When he didn't get that back, it would have made the lesson stick.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
  85. There are methods of resistance. by cog_nate · · Score: 1

    I used to delete these things, which were invariably forwarded to me by well-meaning but unfortunately rather dumb acquaintances. Now I subvert them: Darwin 2.0. Funny; I don't get nearly as many as I used to.

  86. Clicky clicky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You forgot the link.

  87. IRISH VIRUS!!! by hovis · · Score: 3, Funny
    See http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc /data/irish.virus.hoax.html for details, but my favorite hoax is as follows...
    It's too bad that more hoax "victims" don't get this one...

    > Greetings, You have just received the "IRISH VIRUS".
    > As we don't have any programming experience, this Virus
    > works on the honour system. Please delete all the files
    > on your hard drive manually and forward this Virus to
    > everyone on your mailing list. Thank you for your cooperation.

    --
    Confidence is the feeling you have before you understand the situation.
  88. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by michael.creasy · · Score: 1

    Yes, we still have a monorail, but there was a fire so it's not running for the summer. They're going to build a big shiny new one that goes somewhere else as well.

  89. Gigabyte of email by 404notfound · · Score: 1

    "When I got back to school, my account was locked up. There was like a gigabyte of mail, thousands upon thousands of messages."

    Sounds like he could've used Gmail.

  90. Chain Letters? by bobobobo · · Score: 1
    This kind of thing has been around long before email. Anyone remember getting chain letters in the mail, that started out in Norway 10 years ago and will make it into the Guinness Book of World Records assuming you don't mess it up?

    And all you have to do is mail some postcards to five people on the top of the list, add your name, etc etc, you should receive 1,000 postcards in a few weeks time. Same basic premise just different medium.

  91. Let's be nice now... by underpar · · Score: 1

    These e-mails can be a very good thing. How else would I know that aspartame kills diabetics and my kidney is in danger of being stolen after a night of drinking?

  92. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by Issue9mm · · Score: 1

    If you delete the file, it gets recreated instantly.

    -9mm-

  93. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

    There was another vulnerability involving the midi mime-type. Outlook just executed anything that declared itself to be midi and thus if it was an executable, it would run it without asking.

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  94. Urban legend by YouHaveSnail · · Score: 1

    One of his buddies had gotten a make-money-fast spam and Mack said 'I can come up with something better than that.'

    I dunno about that. It sounds an awful lot like an urban legend to me. I mean, how reasonable is it that a couple of college kids sitting around just invented this hoax? It sounds outrageous, but then when you think about it, it's pretty reasonable. A little too reasonable. Kinda like the one where some guy gets seduced by a hot woman only to wake up in a tub of ice one kidney lighter. Could totally happen, right? So, I'm skeptical.

    Even stranger, I'm pretty sure I saw this hoax (if that's really what it is) before 1997. It's more like a 1987 kinda thing... by 1997, the general population had at least some clue about e-mail.

    Plus, it's not like Slashdot is famous for its fact-checking department. I'm sure CmdrTaco is a big fan of MythBusters, but that's not really the same thing. In its heyday, WIRED had a pretty good reputation in that department, but who knows what it's like over there these days with all the lightweight fluff those guys run? How do we know that this Bryan Mack really wrote this e-mail? (And does 'Bryan Mack' even sound like a real name?) Who's to say he's not just taking credit for someone else's work, work that the author was kind enough to place in the public domain, just to gain a few minutes of fame?

  95. Re:Bryan's e-mail address by vorpal22 · · Score: 1

    Perhaps it was a joke, but underestimating the lack of knowledge regarding technology of the average person is no laughing matter. I don't think it's hard to predict how such a "joke" could get out of hand fairly quickly.

    Besides, I'm not lobbying people to write to him. I just thought I'd present them with the opportunity if they choose to do so.

    On his website, he even discusses his real estate involvement with something akin to a pyramid scheme, if you check it out.

  96. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by Keebler71 · · Score: 5, Funny
    After a few dead ends he finally located then-student Bryan Mack, who created the hoax on November 18, 1997 while at the University of Houston.

    What is Bryan's email address?

    --
    "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
  97. I will offer $203.16... by bugmenot · · Score: 5, Funny

    To the moderator who mods me up as insightful...

    --
    This account has been seized by the GNAA. That is all.
    1. Re:I will offer $203.16... by The_dev0 · · Score: 1

      There you go, I just modded you up. Feel free to... d'oh!

      --
      Never fight naked, unless you're in prison...
  98. Not unlikely by coolsva · · Score: 1
    I have seen it being reported many times as a UL, but it is not really that unlikely.

    We all know, spammers are the first to use a practical technology to uniquely identify where the mail goes to (thanks in a large part to HTML/Rich text mails) with the use of either micro images or real images. The server just needs to keep track of your IP (easily retrieved from the HTTP header when your email program tries to get that image) to know who are receiveing it and reading it.

    I would not be surprised if reputable companies start using these to find who are their target audience for a promotion and target them directly with ads through google or advertising.com etc.
    Remember, the above statement constitutes prior art and hence this idea cannot be patented

  99. Re:Bryan's e-mail address by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, if you did deeper, he's got this note on the site:

    My new email address as of 06-02-2004 is mack at fleetmack.com - click the above link to send me an email, or type mack at fleetmack.com - I won't post it on this site as an address anymore to avoid spam. My old email addy of bryan@ fleetmack.com does not work anymore and will be bounced effective 06-05-2004

  100. Reading Comprehension by blunte · · Score: 2, Informative
    Submitter states that Bryan Mack created the hoax while at University of Houston. According to the article, Bryan Mack went to Iowa State.

    *BZZZZZZT* wrong.

    Article says

    I found the same text preserved by an amateur Internet archivist named Martin Miller, a University of Houston student who'd saved every copy of the hoax he received over a seven-year period and posted the collection on his Web site (where he was also selling calendars for Lent). He informed me this version was sent to him in late 1997 and that he believes it's the first. When it got to him, there were just 10 names on the recipient list. The first was Bryan Mack at Iowa State.

    Bryan Mack was no longer a student by the time I came calling. He'd graduated in 2001 and had taken a job programming databases at the Colorado School of Mines. He's a regular guy. He answers his own phone. "I wasn't trying to trick people," he told me. "It was just a joke between a couple friends." Then he described how the joke got a little out of hand.


    It's not a big deal, but if you're going to go to the trouble of pumping up your submission with a lovely URL to a school, get the right one.
    --
    .sigs are for post^Hers.
  101. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by jawtheshark · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It does? I remember a friend of mine that deleted it in Windows 98 and it wasn't recreated. You're probably talking about Windows that has this auto-restore feature (which can be a pain in the ass), but then I have no XP machine so I don't even know if that particular file still exists.

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  102. Re:Stupid article. by 56 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I think he might have been being trying to appeal to those Wired readers out there who don't have your obviously extensive level of technical skill and brilliance. He very neatly explains the content of the hoax e-mail within his story and does it in a funny way.

    You're the idiot, Annonymous Coward.

  103. Paper Virus. by Deathlizard · · Score: 1

    I call these things paper viruses, primarily because they spread like one and are just as bad sometimes.

    I'm going to go off the deep end if I ever have to again fix the mess a certain someone in admissions caused because one of her friend's sent her the "Remove the jdbgmgr virus from your machine, and send this to all your friends so they think your brilliant and..." message and forwards it to half the campus. You know she did it when the phone basicially explodes off my desk with calls concerning it.

    Telling her why not to send it to her entire contact list it like talking to this wall here. If she was listening, she wouldn't have done it three times now.

  104. Stewie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For each time i find that crap in my inbox i shall kill you!

  105. Re:Bryan's e-mail address by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very jerky thing to do. OTOH, it does IMO prove that Mack started the thing. Look at his web site, note his style of humor, and his make-money-now link....yeah, sounds like the guy

  106. the author might not know, but by PhiberOptix · · Score: 1

    his hoax ended up in my mail box in PORTUGUESE. yes, someone actually translated the hoax, and im guessing that his message was probably translated in as many languages as the bible...pretty good for a quick hoax, huh?

  107. Mod Me Up And Win $$$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod me up and win $203.15!

  108. Re:I hate when people forward me this stuff. by Aeiri · · Score: 1

    I usually just block the people without telling them. I filter out BOTH of my parent's email addresses, and they still haven't found out (they NEVER send any worthwhile emails, even though they spend 30 minutes to an hour every day using it).

  109. the ultimate hoax solution - google by timts · · Score: 1

    just use google to find what that story is about, how it was create, whether it's hoax or not, easily.

  110. seems to be right by CoughDropAddict · · Score: 3, Informative

    My quick search of Google Groups seems to support the idea that it showed up in November of 1997. Search for "Bill Gates $1000" before Nov. 1997 and the hoax doesn't show up. Then do the same search before Dec. 1997 and a bunch of things start popping up, such as this thread where someone asks if the hoax has been seen prior to 25 Nov 97 and gets no reply showing a previous occurrence. Here is another message indicating that it was defnitely hot in Dec 1997 (the poster complains about repeatedly getting it).

    Not proof, but likeliness of the story's truth.

    1. Re:seems to be right by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      The hole in this could be the amount of payout- whereas the $1000 payout could easily be this guy from Houston, the first payout I saw for this was a mere $30.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  111. Re:Stupid article. by twofidyKidd · · Score: 1

    What part of, "It's Funny, Laugh" did you fail to understand?

    --


    Hades, PoD: Official Advocate
  112. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by GundyRage · · Score: 1
    I read my email with pine, but I wasn't all too happy of that evolution..

    You should really give Evo 1.4 a try. It has come a long way since then...

    ;)
  113. ahHA by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Now I know who to sue for the money they owe me!

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  114. Address harvesting by gr8_phk · · Score: 1

    And when the spammers get the message forwarded back to their email address they can harvest all the other email addresses from it. I could harvest thousands (millions?) of peoples addresses this way. The more stupid friends they have, the wider this net is.

  115. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

    The old one used to be shiny and new too, you know. I swear, you people just can't be trusted with anything nice!

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  116. He claims to be dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He apparently classifies himself with "the most uneducated people alive."

    "There's not a soul on Earth who enjoys the stuff and the people who send this have to be the most uneducated people alive."--Bryan Mack on SPAM

    This is straight from his website.

  117. Re:Stupid article. by toggles · · Score: 1

    I thought Wired was just a little bit higher caliber than this.

    These days Wired is advertising that you pay for.

  118. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

    "Better look at me boss, I've got troubles."

    "Better look at me boss, I've got troubles."

    "Better look at me boss, I've got troubles."

    (Bonus points to whoever gets the reference.)

  119. Data Mining by Kenny+Austin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I had a friend in highschool who registered (something to the effect of) billgates@hotmail.com and sent an email to every address that could be found in the headers. He claimed he was actually Bill Gates and need a name, address, and telephone number to send the checks to.
    A large number of the recipients actually replied with the requested information. Even worse was the number of people that replied believing they were really giving this information in order to receive a check.. but couldn't be bother to write their areacode, zipcode, state, or city with their reply.

    Joe Doe
    112 4th Street

    Thanks, now Billy can get that new lung!
    - John

  120. Re:Stupid article. by hackstraw · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you're a writer for a technical magazine, shouldn't you at least have the intelligence to spot a scam/hoax email like that within about two seconds?

    I've seen worse. I met a guy that was head of some kind of security division at Symantec. It was previously a standalone company that was acquired by Symantec.

    Anyway, he told me that he had to get someone in his office from his staff to verify an email that came from "Admin" telling him to open some kind of spam malware.

    But hey, he drives a Porsche...

  121. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

    Turns out there's a virus for the GroupWise client that doesn't even require a preview pane. Haven't bothered to look it up, but it showed up at work.

  122. Are those people on tranquilizers? by Neo's+Nemesis · · Score: 1

    Any1 who believed in this has got to be an idiot. Pure idiot.

    You expect Bill Gates, teh richest person in world, who himself owns resources to populate even gmail's 1gb with MS crap, to ask you for a help???? And if ever, a pro believed in this, he deserves to drown in a glass of water. "Mail forwarding automatically detected" - how can you fall for that.

    Damn it. See, its this easy to make bucks. And we all aspire to become the next human compiler etc......

  123. Did they? by cyberzephyr · · Score: 1

    make the check payable to Myron Tereshchuk.

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/06/27/1343 22 1&mode=thread&tid=133&tid=186

    --
    I'm here for the experience, not the Hyperbole.
  124. Re:Stupid article. by jpellino · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Jonathon Keats seems to be a published author with a book on Amazon and everything... who knows if he's also Jon Katz.

    He's being facetious - it's mock-seriousness in the bulk of the article.

    The article wasn't simply pointing out that this letter was a hoax, but got to the bottom of it and found the origin of something the rest of us were sure was lost in the mists of email forwarding.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  125. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    I'll take a stab at Methuselah's Children, but it was a pretty standard technology in a lot of his stories. Of course, it was combined with RSS newsfeeds too.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  126. AC subscription! by althalus · · Score: 1

    Sweet, Anon will now be subscribed. Why pay for one, just login as AC and.... oh.

  127. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by GTRacer · · Score: 1
    Beyond This Horizon?

    What do I get now?

    GTRacer
    - God Bless Google Groups

    --
    Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
  128. Re:I hate when people forward me this stuff. by Gldm · · Score: 1

    With this approach the problem will never be solved or even reduced. Even if I only educate one person that this is a load of bull, that's one less person forwarding this crap around to everyone they know.

    --

    Introducing the new Occam Fusion! Now with sqrt(-1) fewer blades!

  129. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by dmomo · · Score: 1

    What I thought to be impossible had suddenly become a reality.

    Great news, then! If all this spam and chain mail comes true, maybe Bill Gates really WILL send me $200, and I'll have a large enough "one of those" to "THR0W IT T0 H3R FRom Accros5 the Ro0m. xldiendas cqwqsd". That, I will learn "The Secret Of Become Truly Loaded In Just Several Many Weeks".

  130. See? by raehl · · Score: 1

    That's what you get for talking to girls.

  131. Why the sexism/ageism? by PhysicsGenius · · Score: 0
    I'm pretty sure my mom would think this could really happen.

    I think most people are aware that TANSTAAFL and Gates is not going to be sending them money. Just because the email is forwarded by someone doesn't mean they fell for it. This "laughing" that you and your colleagues did--did any of it involve sending it on to someone else so they could laugh or possibly gulled?

    1. Re:Why the sexism/ageism? by jawtheshark · · Score: 1
      The reason I picked my mom is because she started to use email about a year ago. I have protected her toroughly from anything she wouldn't understand (read: too technical). I couldn't pick my dad or my siblings because they are all computer literate. My mom is the only one that is a newbie.

      I could have used the generic "Aunt Sally" or "Uncle John", but I picked my mom. Nothing against my mom: she's a great woman and intelligent on top of that, but computers are the equivalent of magic to her.

      That said, I could replace "mom" with "my girlfriend" who is equally computer illiterate, but saying that you've got a girlfriend lessens your cedibility on slashdot ;-)

      did any of it involve sending it on to someone else so they could laugh or possibly gulled?

      I don't think I forward this particular hoax/joke. I did forward the BadTimes virus, because that one was insanely funny. Well, I only sent it to IT people that could get the joke. I wouldn't send this kind of stuff to people where I'd have the slightest doubt that they wouldn't get it.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    2. Re:Why the sexism/ageism? by IsaacW · · Score: 1
      "my girlfriend" ... is equally computer illiterate
      How come on /. everyone's girlfriend is computer illiterate?

      Because that gives the rest of us the explanation of why we never run into these supposed girlfriends!

      Har har har!
    3. Re:Why the sexism/ageism? by jawtheshark · · Score: 1
      No, you got it all wrong. Those computer illiterate girlfriends have other advantages. I mean, some activities are much more enjoyable that trolling together with your girlfriend on slashdot ;-)

      That said: my previous girlfriend has an account on slashdot. She doesn't log in anymore, which is a good thing.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    4. Re:Why the sexism/ageism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TANSTAAFL? WTF?

      TMAMAPITR.

      KTHXBY.

      Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.

    5. Re:Why the sexism/ageism? by QuaZar666 · · Score: 1

      I have always found that its easier to date someone who doesn't care about technology, etc. They just want to use the computer for what they want to do and thats it. Rhey don't want to fix it, etc. The times that i have dated people that are into technology, and everything have ended in us getting in an arguement over fixing a persons computer and the correct way to do, or us arguing over test questions on exams, etc and how the answer here is "correct" according to the techer but in reality it is completly wrong.

      - Qua

  132. Sending fake emails by Thieron · · Score: 1

    Back in 95 or so I recall that Penn State's VM system would let someone send emails where all the information could be set at the command line. I would get emails from bgates@microsoft.com and such all the time from my friend who discovered this.

    I'm sure I could've traced the email back to the VMS that originated it, but I don't know if the system would have tracked his connection and sending of the email. I was not like he could log in and create the email and set the reply to, etc. He had to connect on the correct port and send commands as if he were an email client.

  133. Nokia's giving away CELL PHONES?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    where to I sign!!!?

    (or to whom to I email my SSN and credit card number?)

  134. Instant Messenger Services by lhpineapple · · Score: 1

    Well e-mail is one thing, but let's not forget that instant messenger services are also susceptible to hoaxes and viruses. They've gained so much popularity in the recent years that a well executed attack on say AOL Instant Messenger could do a lot of damage to personal computers. Especially since so many non-tech savvy people use it.

  135. 7-day underwear by pizza_milkshake · · Score: 1
    ...reading in the bathroom is okay, but chatting on-line is the equivalent of announcing the desire for somebody to invent 7-day underwear.

    i'm wearing some right now

    1. Re:7-day underwear by emilng · · Score: 1

      it should only be 4 day underwear:

      1 day forward
      1 day backwards
      1 day inside out and forward
      1 day inside out and backwards

      8 days if it's 2 days per side

    2. Re:7-day underwear by It'sYerMam · · Score: 1
      That depends on:

      Thick enough underwear so nothing soaks through
      Nothing happening on both side ;-)

      --
      im in ur .sig, writin ur memes.
    3. Re:7-day underwear by egreB · · Score: 1

      Have you never been on a longer trip into the mountains? Ten days in the same underwear is quite adequate, in fact. I usually bring two sets of underwear; one for reserve. No kidding. But then again, 70 kilometres away from people, nobody really cares.

    4. Re:7-day underwear by chriso11 · · Score: 1

      Actually, this(scroll down to brief updates) is the real interesting one!!! It's always fascinated me as a solution to a problem that shouldn't exist.

      --
      No, I don't trust in god. He'll have to pay up front, like everybody else.
    5. Re:7-day underwear by adpowers · · Score: 1

      Or just do what I do and wear pants with inside liners (like a bathing suit). It is good because it lets air flow get to your parts, doesn't get that dirty, and since it is quick drying synthetic, you can wash it off real easy in streams or lakes (not with soap, just rinse).

    6. Re:7-day underwear by prescot6 · · Score: 1

      Or just do what I do and wear pants with inside liners (like a bathing suit).

      Where does one get a good pair of pants with liners?

    7. Re:7-day underwear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should get out of your mom basement more often.

    8. Re:7-day underwear by adpowers · · Score: 1

      I got my nylon pants from REI. It is a brand named Ex Officio. I like them because they are lightweight, comfortable, and they are convertible (meaning you can unzip them into shorts). They come in handy on camping trips, I never need to change :). They don't protect you from the cold much, though, so they are better in warmer climates (although, when you are hiking, even on colder days, it is still nice having lightweight pants).

      My brother just got a pair of shorts with liners from Sports Authority. I don't know the brand name or the material, but they feel heavier (thicker) than mine.

      I highly recommend the pair I bought, though. Good luck with your search.

      Andrew

  136. Electronic Traces [Re: In other breaking news...] by j.leidner · · Score: 1

    Using ./ is not the best way to implement such a scheme, since you can't attach the usual 1-pixel transparent GIF that creates a log entry in your Apache log when recipients view it; after all, you want to record where your message travels to...

  137. Re:Stupid article. by Watts+Martin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Jon Katz is not writing technical articles anymore, AFAIK. He's writing books about dogs. While there are probably innumerable jokes that people could make playing off this, unlike his Slashdot writing or some of his quasi-philosophy books written in the dotcom era, his dog books seem to be pretty well-received by their target audience, and they've been generally well-reviewed. I think you're also being a little too harsh on the person who actually wrote this article. You need a lead-in for a story, this was a fine enough lead-in, and if Wired occasionally writes somewhat whimsical articles like this, so what? Wired was always about features, not news, and somewhat silly features are hardly new to them. And it's a kind of amusing story. Don't be such a sourpuss.

  138. Free iPods - think this is a hoax too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This site has free ipods if you sign up and get 5 friends to sign up for a partner site (e.g. Ancestry.com free trial, which can be cancelled the next day). At least some people have received theirs, according to this discussion forum. I wonder what the signup/ipod giveaway ratio is?

  139. Those were the days... by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

    I remmember getting that email early fall 97 I believe it was before november. Maybe my memmory is wrong. In any case, I must have recieved it very soon after it was created. A lot of people were new to email and the internet and didn't know what was possible. I recieved something like 7 free cd's that year from various web coupons and promotions as companies like cdnow and cd universe and amazon were giving all kinds of crazy discounts just to attract visitors. So its not that much farther of a logical leep to be paid for forwarding email.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  140. That combined with penis enlargement ... by arhar · · Score: 3, Funny

    Send $5 to the 5 names on this list, then put your name at the top, remove that last entry, and send it to 5 of your friends.
    I forgot where I read that (maybe even here), but here goes anyway:

    Imagine that combined with penis enlargment spam. Cut your penis into 5 parts, send each part to top 5 names on the list.. receive more penis in the mail! Guaranteed to add inches and inches to your penis!

  141. "Real" McDonalds Job App & Shit Nickels Fast by gbulmash · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I'm all too familiar with how things like this can cycle. You can find my job application joke (with various alterations and claims that it's a real job application) on over 1,000 sites, regularly circulating in e-mail, and it even has its own Snopes.com page.

    I wrote it over 7 years ago for my web site, posted it to a couple of humor newsgroups to get some promo. Someone stripped my intro, sent it to a couple of humor lists with the claim it was real, and it exploded.

    Sadly, my Shit Nickels Fast chain letter parody did not do as well.

    - Greg

  142. *HUG* ~ from an anonymous freak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mmmmmmmm.....

  143. Why didn't he come up with something truly funny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like when I sent an email like this as joke to one of my fellow college students (who wasn't exactly the sharpest knives in the drawer) that ran - "You recieved this email as a special invitation tho help out with a beta test of a very special medical survey & tracking program for Trojan. If you help them out beta test this by clicking the following link and placing your Penis on your scanner now, Trojan will send you a free personalized pack of condoms in the mail! Please feel free to forward this message and invite all of your friends to help out."

    Well, I'd expected to have him come around and comment to me about it or something. Maybe even stupidly routing it around to the entire dorm. But I heard nothing for a few weeks. I then later heard a story from a female co-worker at the CS helpdesk that *some pervert* had called sometime back wanting to know how they could get pubic hairs out of their fax scanner! I simply ROTFLMAO... (And so did she after I explained what I thought had happened.)

  144. DUDE! by asdfasdfasdfasdf · · Score: 1

    Can you imagine how much simoniker is gonna rake in from Gates by getting so many people to read the email.. Lucky bastard. Wish I would have thought to post it on Slashdot.

  145. Bzzz! by zx-6e · · Score: 1
    Bryan Mack was at Iowa State, not Univ of Houston (from the article):
    The first was Bryan Mack at Iowa State
  146. funny flash movie (on topic) by PeeweeJD · · Score: 1

    this flash movie is funny (if you have flash player)... it is a spoof of these chain letter emails... oldie but goodie...

    http://gw6help.uvsc.edu/gw6help/soapbox.swf

  147. Slander! by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

    The guy who wrote the story is just sore that he didn't forward the mail and so didn't receive any money. Why, I just received my check for $4340.24 from Bill Gates only yesterday.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  148. Losers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're all losers.

    Not Me.

  149. Re:Stupid article. by RussR42 · · Score: 1

    Because it was about finding the source...

  150. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by at_kernel_99 · · Score: 1

    Why is this not +5 funny?

  151. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by jawtheshark · · Score: 1
    Hehe, I was talking about my student times... back in 1994, when we got our first shell access and email on the uni server.

    Today I'm one of those bastards that use Mail.App. The day I have got more time, I'll try installing Linux again (read: I have this nice desktop waiting for me to play with it, but I've some other priorities right now)

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  152. 5 years later by Matheus+Villela · · Score: 1

    And now Microsoft can take the apropriate action:

    Microsoft letter to press about the hoax:

    Message to Customers on "Email Tracking Program" Hoax

    REDMOND, Wash., May 12, 1999 - Recently an email has been circulating on the Internet about a new "email tracking system" from Microsoft.

    As you may have suspected, this is a hoax and did not originate from Microsoft.

    Microsoft does try to investigate the source of these hoaxes and take appropriate action. However, many times the hoaxers take elaborate steps to shield their true identities and we cannot identify them. Privacy and security are very important to us here at Microsoft, and we work every day to build great software for the Internet that keeps information safe, secure and private.

    We regret any inconvenience this may have caused you.

    Sincerely,
    Microsoft Corporation

  153. Speaking of hoaxes... by shokk · · Score: 1

    Someone played a hoax on Slashdot the other day with this link.

    --
    "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  154. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by Keeper · · Score: 1

    Not to my knowledge. Though, if you think about it, any such worm would be rather unsuccessful -- how many people do you know that use pine, and know people that use pine as well? Any worm which tries to take advantage of the vulnerability is going to need to attack more than just Pine.

  155. Pick your target by Atario · · Score: 1

    I think you really mean to kill the dummy who took the joke seriously and forwarded it everywhere.

    I, on the other hand, want to kill the tiny part of each person's brain that makes them not think about shit like this before sending it to their entire address book (all visible to one another in the To: line, of course). Unfortunately, the treatment would have to be applied to about 95% of the human race. Maybe it would be more efficient with a retrovirus doing the work. Now that would be ironic.

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  156. My chain mail by Dulimano · · Score: 1

    I built my own chain mail some time ago. It was written in Hungarian, and this is a poor and partial translation, but here it is:

    This mail is forwarded to you as part of a sociology experiment / game. The name of the game is: "Who is the lamest?" If you would like to participate, all you have to do is to

    forward this letter to your three lamest acquaintances.

    (This is how you got this letter.) We leave it to your own judgement to decide what makes someone lame. But please participate only if you play by the spirit of the game. Please try to pick people much lamer than you. Of course, if you are very lame yourself, you can make some compromises.

    Thank you for your participation.

  157. Aren't things ripe to repeat this same message... by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 3, Funny
    ...except with "GOOGLE" instead of Microsoft?

    Google's new email offering, gmail, is what everyone's talking about! And people are confused about Google's "tracking" of the messages you send and putting ads on it.

    So a letter that explains that Google's testing a new email system (true!) and that they're using their search technology to track emails would be beleived by enough people to make a new round of this chain letter spread even faster than it ever had!

    C'mon /. folks! Here's a challenge! Write a letter and sent it to a dozen of your most gullible friends!

  158. MOD PARENT UP and get $25.00 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    Slashdot is conducting a test of its new metamoderation system.

    Everyone who mods the parent of this article isightful will get $25!

    In addition, everyone who metamoderates the moderators will get $50!

    Please help the folks at /. refine their technology by participating in this important test.

  159. Snopes by meehawl · · Score: 2, Informative

    The idea is to make people feel stupid for being a part of the chain letter, not to insult them.

    This works for me as well. I usually refer them to the following hoax busting sites:

    Snopes
    Urban Legends
    Symantec Hoax Warnings ("$800 from Microsoft" is listed first on this page!
    Hoaxbusters
    VMyths

    If more gullible journalists and people would think a little and do some simple, quick research before hitting the SEND button then we'd all be a lot better off.

    --

    Da Blog
  160. Hey guys! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How's it going?

  161. And all the /. subscribers chanted... by Dissenter · · Score: 1

    Crucify Him!
    Crucify Him!
    Crucify Him!

    --

    Dissenter
    "There is no knowledge that is not power."

  162. University of Iowa by husker_man · · Score: 1


    Minor correction: Bryan Mack attended the University of Iowa (from the article). Martin Miller, formerly of the University of Houston, was the person who had archived the thousands of emails that traced back to Bryan Mack.

    1. Re:University of Iowa by Lucretian · · Score: 2, Informative

      Minor correction to your correction: Bryan Mack attended Iowa State University(from the article), which is much different than University of Iowa.

  163. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by nuggetman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A funny story about that..

    As soon as I heard about it I sent an email to a girl I know who has a horrible tendancy to believe these things explaining that it was a hoax. The following conversation ensued.

    First, the important back end to the punchline: Her comptuer at the time was an old Compaq Presario, 200mhz, 32 megs of RAM, and Windows95
    Her: I deleted that file
    Me: I told you it was a hoax
    Her: Yeah but I had the file on my computer!
    (I decide to take this and run with it)
    Me: I told you it was a hoax for a reason, now if you shut your computer down you aren't going to be able to start it back up again.
    (she signs off and isn't seen online again for about a week)
    Her: Colin am I ever going to be able to turn off my computer?

    She BELIEVED me and actually left her dinosaur Win95 box running for a week straight. I was surprised after running that long she was able to get on to AOL 6.0 and IM me without the system falling to its knees in a spectacular stream of 30 BSODs.

    Stupid is as stupid does I guess

    --
    ...and that's all there is to it.
  164. The dangerous beauty of marketing by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

    Didn't any of these people know enough to think that no reports are magically sent to Microsoft when you e-mail someone?

    Microsoft produces a major e-mail server (Exchange) and the dominant email clients (Outlook/Outlook Express). I agree that this email is stupid; that being said, if anyone could orchestrate a system where a special header passing through a system triggered a message being sent to Microsoft, it would be Microsoft.

    (... imagine the privacy implications!)

    Microsoft advocates *Passport* as a global authentication system, which lets them obtain your personal information and monitor who you are authenticating yourself to anytime, anywhere. You think they'd be concerned about the privacy issues involved with passing on an email?

    Or have enough elementary business sense to realize that Microsoft won't just send people money for nothing?

    Microsoft hands out a web browser and an email client "for nothing". A lot of companies are willing to take a short-term loss for some kind of gain. If there was some huge marketing advantage to knowing something about how email or ideas propagate, I could see this being worthwhile (though perhaps not in the sums that Microsoft is using). Knowing which people know which people can be terribly valuable information when designing marketing campaigns, and this would provide a neat graph. Microsoft *did* in fact do something similar to this when it purchased Hotmail, which allows it to harvest email addresses and derive social graphs that determine who knows and interacts with whom, and how quickly ideas and memes flow. The marketing information inherent in aggregate data derived from Hotmail's contents is incredibly valuable. Suppose "Spiderman 2" marketing goes out, and a bunch of derived data from emails containing "Spiderman 2" in one of the world's largest email systems was made commercially available? How much would you, as the Marketing Director involved, pay to know what people in Phoenix, Arizona were privately saying about your film and your ads? Would it be worth a million dollars to avoid mis-targeting your next multi-million-dollar marketing campaign element?

  165. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by RealErmine · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't have that file. I got an email that told me to delete it, so I did. So far so .~ ^.8 . ++++[carrier lost]

    Where do I get one of these modems that writes [carrier lost] into web forum posts before it disconnects? It seems like everyone has one but me... or maybe it's done at the ISP level!?.

    --
    Dewey, you fool! Your decimal system has played right into my hands!
  166. Re:Stupid article. by Phurd+Phlegm · · Score: 1
    If you're a writer for a technical magazine, shouldn't you at least have the intelligence to spot a scam/hoax email like that within about two seconds? Who ever saw an email even remotely like that and took it seriously for even one fucking moment?
    Insightful?

    If you're an Anonymous Coward on slashdot and you don't have the intelligence to spot a rhetorical device used by an author who . . . oh . . . never mind. Don't know what I was thinking . . . .

  167. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by Matey-O · · Score: 3, Funny

    Excuse me, I'm an engineer with QUME, can you plug your terminal in to a phone line for a sec? We've had some reports of leaky capacitors detabilizing the electron gun on your CRT that could cause sterility, it's something we can fix and patch remotely.

    What's your number again?

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
  168. Forward This Article And Get Paid $203.15 by Mixel · · Score: 1

    Posted by simoniker on Tuesday June 29, @06:18PM from the or-not dept.

    Iphtashu Fitz writes "We've all seen it. The e-mail forwarded to us from a friend who got it from a coworker whose sister's cousin's roommate's great aunt knows somebody at Microsoft. The one from Bill Gates himself offering you cash to forward the e-mail to others in order to test out their new e-mail tracking system. If you haven't received that one you've undoubtedly gotten other e-mail hoaxes offering anything from gift certificates to free computers to free airline tickets. How do these sorts of hoaxes start and who starts them? Well Jonathon Keats at Wired Magazine decided to track down the origin of the Bill Gates e-mail tracking hoax. After a few dead ends he finally located then-student Bryan Mack, who created the hoax on November 18, 1997 while at the University of Houston. In Mack's own words: 'It was just a joke between a couple friends' that eventually got out of hand. One of his buddies had gotten a make-money-fast spam and Mack said 'I can come up with something better than that.' Three minutes later, Bill Gates' email-tracing program was born. At first he just sent it to a few friends, but those friends sent it to other friends (and so on), and it didn't take long for the e-mail to transform from a joke to a full-fledged hoax."

    Can I have my money now?

  169. just trolling, ignore. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    quoth the parent:

    Was it the sheep climbing onto the altar, or the cattle lowing to be slain,
    or the Son of God hanging dead and bloodied on a cross that told me this was a world condemned, but loved and bought with blood.


    I must point out that:

    1) an all knowing being always knows the long-term consequences of his actions.
    2) an all powerful being can take whatever actions he desires.

    therefore:

    3) an all-knowing all-powerful being (God) will always have his creations turn out exactly as he wants them to be.

    If this world is "condemned" it is because God wanted it to be that way, from the very beginning, as a matter of logical necessity.

    (Just because I know you are thinking it...."Free will" cannot be the culprit since an all knowing being will STILL know what a free being will freely choose to do. Perhaps your God isn't REALLY all knowing, and is only mostly-knowing?)

    --AC

    1. Re:just trolling, ignore. by revery · · Score: 1

      1) an all knowing being always knows the long-term consequences of his actions.
      Correct.

      2) an all powerful being can take whatever actions he desires.
      Correct

      3) an all-knowing all-powerful being (God) will always have his creations turn out exactly as he wants them to be.
      Correct.

      I'd add another one:
      4) an all-knowing all-powerful being (God) defines everything. He is not bound by the definitions that a man, or a church, or a slashdot poster places on words or concepts.

      --

      Was it the sheep climbing onto the altar, or the cattle lowing to be slain,
      or the Son of God hanging dead and bloodied on a cross that told me this was a world condemned, but loved and bought with blood.

  170. Already Being Done by fdiskne1 · · Score: 1

    By Flowgo and company. Some of their other domains are send4fun.com, cutestuff.com and too many others. I already blocked them from being visited from inside the network I manage. They saw how many people forwarded "cute" emails so they started putting together cute messages that also contain web bugs and advertising links so the recipients would forward them to their friends. As much as it frightens me, it works. I see these bouncing around directly from Flowgo and being forwarded by others. Here's a sample:

    Subject: Yankee Doodle Baby

    1.) Yankee Doodle Baby
    <link to "cute" website>

    2.) Beauty of Freedom *new*
    <link to "cute" website>

    3.) Bad Bad Puppy Poop Doggy Dawg!
    <link to "cute" website>

    Memories are made at summer camp. Research the perfect camp for your child here!
    <link to advertising website>

    4.) A Morning Prayer
    <link to "cute" website>

    Tired of paying higher and higher prices for gasoline?
    Fight back! You can get $100 of FREE gasoline!
    Just click on the link below or copy it into your browser bar:
    <link to advertising website>

    5.) Call It Kitty Love
    <link to "cute" website>

    There is a lot more than that, but I don't want to be accused of spamming for them.

    --
    But why is the rum gone?
  171. Re:Aren't things ripe to repeat this same message. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a great idea! I don't have the balls to start it myself, but I sure hope *somebody* does!

  172. I get no respect by Cyberhwk · · Score: 1
    Wow, you don't get much respect from your friends
    Well Actually I do get respect from my friends. But honestly I think it is not a problem with respect and more a problem with my friends being stubburn and still think they are l33t cause they can download "free songs and pr0n" off kazaa. *shrugs* they are nice people its just they give me brain damage. Its only a matter of time before my brain hemorages. Then where will I be? Oh I also get the friend who thinks its funny to send this stuff on. I like to think of subtle ways of torturing these people.
  173. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Funny

    Especially since it's in the box in the basement right now

    Come on. We all know "security through obscurity" doesn't work.

    --
    Hey freaks: now you're ju
  174. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by Issue9mm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I just tried it on 3 machines, and it did. One was XP, 2 were 2000. I have no recollection of what it did on 9x boxes, but I seem to recall it not impacting anything. I could be grossly mistaken.

    -9mm-

  175. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by coolsva · · Score: 1
    I have seen it being reported many times as a UL, but it is not really that unlikely.
    We all know, spammers are the first to use a practical technology to uniquely identify where the mail goes to (thanks in a large part to HTML/Rich text mails) with the use of either micro images or real images. The server just needs to keep track of your IP (easily retrieved from the HTTP header when your email program tries to get that image) to know who are receiveing it and reading it.
    I would not be surprised if reputable companies start using these to find who are their target audience for a promotion and target them directly with ads through google or advertising.com etc.

    Remember, the above statement constitutes prior art and hence this idea cannot be patented

  176. Yep, here's one from 1994 by cliveholloway · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
    1. Re:Yep, here's one from 1994 by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not quite the same- this one is a multi-level marketing scheme for open source development, at least a year before I had ever heard of Open Source....neat idea if you believe, like most outsourcing CIOs do, that you don't need any knowledge of the project to actually program for it.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  177. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by Blackice912 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Back when I worked at a computer repair shop, our front counter girl got that hoax e-mail about the bear file. What did she do? Deleted the file off of every display system we had for sale.

    The boss chewed her a new one.

  178. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by jawtheshark · · Score: 1
    I can assure you it doesn't restore it in the 9x series. Both 2000 and XP come with some autorecovery functionality (if you've ever installed UltraEdit as a drop in replacement for Notepad, you have to turn that feature off for a while)

    The bear thing is not important at all. There was a similar hoax that was related to long filenames in Win9x, which was sometimes a bit more troublesome.

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  179. No wonder!! by Sonus · · Score: 1

    I got this blasted email so many times it's not funny. Now I know its because I was at UH until 1998!

  180. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want to know how the modem manages to click the 'submit' button before dropping carrier...

  181. Mack, Bryan contact info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mack, Bryan
    Institutional Advancement
    Office: AN 230
    Work Telephone: (303) 273-3132
    Business Email: bmack@mines.edu
    Classification: Directory Entry
    Computing User ID: 1941

  182. This is not a hoax warning! by eman1961 · · Score: 2, Funny
    I hate hoax warnings, but this one is IMPORTANT!

    Please send this to everyone in your address book, NOW.

    If a man (or woman) comes to your front door and says he (or she) is conducting a survey and asks you to show them your ass, DO NOT do this.

    This is a SCAM!!!!!!!! He (or she) just wants to see your ass.

    I wish I'd gotten this yesterday.

  183. 7.91 * 10111 ? by playswithfood · · Score: 1

    From the article: "On truthminers.com, mathematician Simon Nance calculated that in a mere three months of propagation, the email had put Microsoft, AOL, and Intel, individually or in combination, on the hook to owe 7.91 x 10111 dollars." So, the grand sum for three months is under $80,000? That's pretty dumb. It doesn't take a mathematician to figure out this article is total crap. The actual figure from truthminers.com is "close to $226 Billion times 3.5 googol". Now that's exponential growth.

    1. Re:7.91 * 10111 ? by Sique · · Score: 1

      It probably was 7.91 to the power of 10111 in the beginning ;)

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    2. Re:7.91 * 10111 ? by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      Should have read 7.91 * ( 10 raised to the 111th power).. which is 7.91 * 10^11 Googles... ;p

  184. seriously by NumbThumb · · Score: 1

    just today, i asked someone to test a website on a PDA. He Told me "sure, my PDA has WLAN, I always use it to surf while i'm on the toilet". Somehow, i found it a little disturbing that he was going to test my software while taking a shit...

    --
    I have discovered a truly remarkable sig which this 120 chars is too small to contain.
  185. Re:I hate when people forward me this stuff. by shayne321 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I usually tell whoever forwarded this to me (as it's usually someone who knows me) that if they keep doing it I'll be forced to block all mail from them.

    I do the same. One thing I've found that helps before you block _all_ mail from them is block any thing that comes from their email address where the subject starts with "fw". This will catch "Fwd: make money fast!", "Fw: some joke", "Fw: Re: Fwd: Re: Fw: funny!". Most microsoft MUAs and common webmail systems I've seen handle forwards this way (prepending Fw: or Fwd:). Usually if it's just a FoaF I never get legit forwards from them anyway, and if they want to actually type me an email the chance of the subject starting with Fw is small.

    Sometimes I find they remove the freaking subject altogether before forwarding it on.. If that happens I just block everything from them. Works for me so far.

    --
    Today I didn't even have to use my AK; I got to say it was a good day -- Icecube
  186. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by KjetilK · · Score: 1

    Back then we laughed with those pranks because we knew it was impossible. I kept laughing, until the day it really happened.

    I must admit that I still couldn't believe it long after it happened. Still told friends "don't worry, it's hoax". I still find it very hard to understand why anybody could be so careless as to make it possible after having the warnings of hundreds of some very high-profile hoaxes. I think I even flamed a mainstream-media journalist once for being "careless" to spread a hoax, when it actually was a real trojan....

    --
    Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
  187. Testing /. bulleting board by vmaxxxed · · Score: 1


    Hello, this is a test of the ./ board.

    We will pay $100 to every one who replies to this and help testing.
    Also, we will pay $10 for each person who replies below your posting.

    Thanks!


  188. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by M.+Silver · · Score: 4, Informative

    Back in the olden days, modems would indeed send NO CARRIER, and many BBSi would cheerfully record it.

    Many people didn't set their modems with appropriate timeout space before and after +++, so you could do goofy things like drop the server's modem into command mode (because it faithfully echoed your keystrokes) by doing that. As I recall, some modems even acknowledged the +++ when it was received from remote, so you could have even more fun by embedding +++ATH0 or worse commands into your messages.

    There were all sorts of fun things to do with Hayes-compat modems, Back In The Day.

    --

    Slashdot's token middle-aged housewife
  189. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by M.+Silver · · Score: 1

    She BELIEVED me and actually left her dinosaur Win95 box running for a week straight. I was surprised after running that long she was able to get on to AOL 6.0 and IM me without the system falling to its knees in a spectacular stream of 30 BSODs.

    Erm, I have my even-more-dinosaurish-these-days Win95 box running 24/7. I reboot on occasion, but probably not weekly, and generally not because of BSODs (inexplicable lockups are more common, but still not weekly).

    Of course, I'm not running AOL. And I suppose it's a case of survival of the fittest; crash-prone installs probably led to upgrades sooner than this.

    --

    Slashdot's token middle-aged housewife
  190. I just hope you don't pay for it... by sYn+pHrEAk · · Score: 1
  191. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by RevAaron · · Score: 1

    I thought it was interesting that all the vunerable systems listed were Linux.

    Of course, it doesn't concern me because I read my email with pine running on the university's solaris boxes.

    --

    Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  192. POSTER ERROR - MOD PARENT UP by MasterC · · Score: 1

    Yeah, the originator was from Iowa State not U of Houston.

    Us cyclone fans do crazy things like that! :)

    --
    :wq
  193. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1
    Considering a good Hayes 1200 would run you $400-500 back in the day, that was pretty sad.

    Sigh. I remember having Hayes envy with my cheap-ass Radio Shack 300 bauder, with the oh-so-70s DPDT switch on the front to connect...

    --
    Yeah, right.
  194. More importantly by commodoresloat · · Score: 1
    And who would be stupid enough to believe a software company would make executables launch from within the email, or for that matter the header?

    More importantly, what kind of moron would believe that a company like Microsoft will give you a penny for forwarding email?

    Far too many such morons exist, considering the number of times I've been forwarded this email. This thing is 7 years old and I still receive it!!

  195. wierd? by edsonmedina · · Score: 1

    Not sure about you, but taking a dump with a laptop on your lap is weird.

    That's what stools are made for.

    Do you rest your magazine on your lap while reading it?

    1. Re:wierd? by DissidentHere · · Score: 1

      At first I thought this was a poop joke....

      Then I was very disappointed.

      --
      "None of us are as dumb as all of us." - meeting mantra
    2. Re:wierd? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes I eat my lunch while taking a dump. Try it, it's fun.

  196. Google G-Mail Technology by Dysson · · Score: 1

    Actually, I have an idea that could possibly decrease the amount of hoax e-mails being sent by novice users. Google could use their new ad placement technology to scan the email before it is sent and then report to the user that it is a hoax. Of course, Google would have to maintain a hoax database in order for this to work optimally. I dunno, it sounds like it would be a nice added feature to G-Mail. Arrr!!

  197. Re:"Real" McDonalds Job App & Shit Nickels Fas by gmhowell · · Score: 1

    Holy crap, I remember that. I subscribed to your lists. Sad day when you stopped publishing.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  198. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's more complicated. Hayes owned a patent which requried that the +++ have certain timing characteristics. It could not be too fast or too slow -- roughly what it would take someone to type in.

    By patenting this Hayes was able to prevent other modem manufacturers that made Hayes-compatable command sets from copying the timing characteristics.

    Thus a +++ in data sent to the user would not affect Hayes modems but could create havoc on non-Hayes modems.

    A.C.

  199. Re:I hate when people forward me this stuff. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice trick. I find that most people who spam me with silly jokes generally don't ever send me anything worthwhile, but then again I'm reluctant to block them completely, on the off chance that they might send me a real message. Yours is a pretty good compromise: I think I'll apply it on some of my most annoying correspondents right away.

  200. friendsTHE TIME HAS COME by OneIsNotPrime · · Score: 1

    YES IT WORKED FOR ME TOO AND HERE I;m now telljing you all about our new programs included 17% bONUS RANGE FOR QUALIFICATION STUDENTS!!!!!!!!! yes I say "Hello to you once good sir" and here I'min to tell you all about these fine points:: 1)YOUTOO Can make good money forwarding Bill Gates emali AS HAS MY FATHER 1) much avidence has THANKS YOU. Forward to allfriends for cash prize. swimmer ballrom underwater plastic discernment

    --

    ---

    WARNING:Slashdot karma not redeemable in the afterlife.

  201. Re:Aren't things ripe to repeat this same message. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try this letter! (remember--it's a JOKE! Don't really forward it to anyone. I don't want to get into trouble.)

    Dear Friend:

    As you know, GOOGLE is testing a new email system called GMAIL, and they need your help! We all know that GOOGLE is run by smart wiz-kids who think out-of-the-box, not like stodgy old Microsoft or IBM!

    Since GOOGLE is about to go public, they want a "new economy" way of issuing their hot new stock offering. Something that moves at "internet time" instead of the old Brick and Mortar way!

    GOOGLE want to test a new email tracking system for use with GMAIL. If you forward this message, for every 10 people that receive it (don't worry...Google's powerful search technology can detect it!) you will get ONE SHARE of pre-IPO stock. If the people you send this mail forward it again, then you will receive a share for every HUNDRED they forward, and so on. There is a maximum of 1000 pre-IPO shares per participant in this experiment.

    Simply FORWARD THIS MESSAGE IN ITS ENTIRITY to your friends. Be sure to include the following line so Google's powerful "mail sense" technology can find it:

    --_BEGIN TRACKING CODE_--
    PLOUGH PLOVER XYZZY SNOPES
    --_END TRACKING CODE_--

    Thank you for helping to participate in this exciting new eMail technology. With your help, Google can devise and perfect the next generation of spam-free email technology! All you have to do is forward this email to at least 10 of your friends.

  202. Re:I hate when people forward me this stuff. by Jay+L · · Score: 1

    One thing I've found that helps before you block _all_ mail from them is block any thing that comes from their email address where the subject starts with "fw".

    I actually tried that from the server side. Forwarding, on AOL, is an actual message construct, with metadata and everything. After a long battle, I finally convinced TPTB at AOL to let us prevent all e-mail forwarding chains longer than, say, 50 forwards from being sent. If you tried, it popped up a warning that chain letters were against the Terms of Service.. this was a personal fixation of mine, since "jay@aol.com" got not only chain letters intended for me but chain letters intended for ANYONE named Jay.

    It didn't make even the tiniest dent. People just started replying w/quoting instead of forwarding once they hit the limit. Sigh.

    Jay Levitt
    ex-AOL Mail Guy

  203. Re:"Real" McDonalds Job App & Shit Nickels Fas by jeduthun · · Score: 1

    I've seen that several times and it's always brought a chuckle or two. I'm honored to meet the author. *shakes your hand* Good work, sir!

  204. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by stud9920 · · Score: 1

    Ah Ah Ah ! You have caught the Blonde Virus. This virus is honor based. 1)Forward this email to all people in your adress book 2)Erase your hard drive

  205. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by multipartmixed · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It has nothing to do with commands being accepted from remote, and everything with characters typed at the remote end being echoed back. It's not a modem problem, it's a *software* problem.

    As for embedding problematic code in messages, that's either a software problem or a brain-dead operator problem. Hayes SmartModems (and every other modem since, AFAIK) by default require 1 second of silence before the escape sequence (+++). And once the remote modem has dropped back to command mode, it takes a *local* (to it) command to make it do anything.

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  206. Re:"Real" McDonalds Job App & Shit Nickels Fas by gbulmash · · Score: 1
    Holy crap, I remember that. I subscribed to your lists. Sad day when you stopped publishing.

    Holy crap! A former subscriber??? Guess the robots from the future haven't found and killed all of you yet.

    - Greg

  207. Re:Aren't things ripe to repeat this same message. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a good start!

  208. Here's a good reason why by _newwave_ · · Score: 1


    Because it's free.

  209. Oh yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Here's one to all the slashdotters who thought this was true, and Gates was really tracking email!

    Hail Eris!!! Look out for the Illuminati!!!!! Wear a tinfoil hat!!!11!!one

  210. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by brunokummel · · Score: 1

    worse than receiving a spam is receiving a translated spam!! I already received this microsoft spam in three different languages. I only hope that when they decide do pay me, they do it with american dollars!

    --
    What is best in life? To crush your enemies, to see them driven before you and to hear the lamentations of their women.
  211. I love the ones with .DOC or .XLS attachments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I got one last week, it was an excel spreadsheet that you fill in a few cells, and it tells you to get back to work.

    Looking at the Properties of the document, I could track it back to the author, who probably built it at work (qwest)! Poor sucker is probably going to get fired!

  212. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually, this still works quite often. The vast majority of users still use dialup. Many modems (especially the cheaper ones) will hang up if you can get the user to send +++ATH0 at all. This means that if you send +++ATH0 as the payload of an ICMP echo request, and they echo it back, you can force a hangup.

    Most modems support initialization strings that allow you to disable this feature, or enable the delay to stop attacks like this, but it is often on by default.

    The last modem I tried this on was a USR Sportster 56K, and it worked just fine. You can do it with nix's ping command, or with specially crafted ICMP packets from Windows (you can't pass a payload directly to Windows' ping).

  213. that reminds me by againstdemons · · Score: 1

    I remember a back in the day scheme. A friend and I decided to go through each and every stupid fwd that we received and collect the names. We saved em up for a couple months and ended up with some 30,000 names or so. Then I created a message that had something to do with donating money to help animals. The keenest thing I did was add a "re:" to the beginning of the subject. That way I could deny being the originator. Man did that cause some havoc. I know we got a bunch of email addresses banned. A good time was had by all. Well, maybe just us.

  214. It's older than that! by jonadab · · Score: 1

    > Bryan Mack, who created the hoax on November 18, 1997

    I'm stone cold certain that I first had this hoax (or something *very*
    similar; it definitely involved Bill Gates' being able to track how many
    people forwarded the message and donating money if enough people did it)
    forwarded to me when I was in college. I graduated in May of 1997. That
    puts it well before November of 1997. Frankly I'm pretty sure it was
    before any part of 1997.

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  215. hint by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

    The nesting continues.. At a certain momnet they dont get indented further but wen you view that message, the sibblings are indented ok.. (for the next few levels). or you can check it with 'parent'.

    --
    "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
  216. 26 levels deep! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and counting (can anyone recount?)

    **** Increace level number in subject when you reply! ****

    1. Re:26 levels deep! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no

    2. Re:26 levels deep! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I won't do that either.

  217. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by M.+Silver · · Score: 2, Informative

    It has nothing to do with commands being accepted from remote, and everything with characters typed at the remote end being echoed back. It's not a modem problem, it's a *software* problem.

    Um... no. Some modems recognized the characters from remote *with no echo*. Most sysops fixed it on the BBS computer in a hurry, but in a few cases you could hang up on a *user's* computer because their modem defaulted to accepting commands from remote. I wrote code into the Phoenyx to escape the +++ sequence, so as not to allow that problem.

    I don't think a real SmartModem had that problem (unless you set it that way on purpose) but not all "Hayes-compat" modems were fully Hayes compatible, and most of us couldn't afford a Hayes. I can't remember what brand my first 1200 was (my 300 was the manually-operated TRS-80 Modem I another poster mentioned... I've still got it) but it didn't support everything a Hayes did, and did support some things Hayes didn't (which wasn't always good).

    And of course once that got fixed, it was always fun to social-engineer people into doing it (or similar things) to their own modem...

    (I'm sure the bits have all rotted away, or I'd pull out the old diskettes (and an Amiga disk-reader program, I suppose) and dig up old Phoenyx messages on the subject...)

    --

    Slashdot's token middle-aged housewife
  218. Boy scount stincks by KrunZ · · Score: 1

    It not just a popular saying, it's now the TRUTH.

  219. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by Technician · · Score: 1

    Many people didn't set their modems with appropriate timeout space before and after +++,

    In some BBS programs, you could change the escape charactor and change it in the modem by an S register. Changing the +++ to ^V^V^V (control V in place of +) disabled a lot of remote pranks. I got the idea from the Motorola Alphamate paging protocol my text paging terminal software used. In this case security via obscurity worked for me. Users of the BBS just knew that a remote +++ did nothing.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  220. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

    I used to have loads of fun with this.
    ping host -d 2b2b2b..

    I forget the rest - but basically +++ATH0 in hex. Used to remember it off by heart.. oh well.

  221. Re:I hate when people forward me this stuff. by ProfFalcon · · Score: 1

    So then, the only issue you have is that your email is added to a list of 20 other people, all of which forward it on leaving your email address in the header. Lather, rinse, repeat.

    Ralsky loves when that happens.

    --
    Simply stating [Citation Needed] does not automatically make you insightful or brilliant.
  222. Terminal in the bathroom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IRC and ./ from the pooper

  223. that is nothing by sad_ · · Score: 1

    compared to all those 'you have been hugged' or 'you have a friend' mails that instruct you to forward it to x friends or else something bad will happen to you! *phear*
    the worst thing is ofcourse that people keep forwarding this #!$#@%$$#%^!@&^@# crap!

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  224. Deeper and deeper... by Articuno · · Score: 1

    When will we reach MAXINT ? ^_^

    --
    So Long and Thanks for All the Fish!
  225. Re:Testing /. bulleting board by anaphora · · Score: 1

    Done. Payable in slashdot subscriptions.

  226. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    "She BELIEVED me and actually left her dinosaur Win95 box running for a week straight. I was surprised after running that long she was able to get on to AOL 6.0 and IM me without the system falling to its knees in a spectacular stream of 30 BSODs. "

    I'm more suprised that she was able to get the Win95 box to run for that full week straight.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  227. Re:Ah... good old hoaxes... by maximilln · · Score: 1

    I think you're on crack.

    Modems would not send NO CARRIER out to the remote end. Rather, the NO CARRIER that a BBS would record would be the report from it's own local modem indicating that it no longer had a signal from the remote end. Proof? Many of my friends and I ran BBSs and we all set our modems to V0--numeric error messages. Not once did our logs ever show "NO CARRIER". It was always 0 (OK), 2 (RING), or 3 (NO CARRIER). In the earliest days dropped carrier was a big problem because many modems were not equipped to detect a loss of carrier and would happily continue talking with an end which had hung up.

    The same goes for the escape sequence. You could send your own modem into command mode but you cannot send a remote modem into command mode.

    If you really feel strongly about your hoax then please point to some real citations. My friends and I have been using my style of .sig for many, many years and have yet to be contacted by any sysadmin, user, or other friend that it causes any problems.

    --
    +++ATHZ 99:5:80