Slashdot Mirror


It's Just the 'internet' Now?

This morning Wired News announced that 'web', 'net', and 'internet' will no longer be capitalized in their stories. Is this the next logical step after ditching 'e-mail' in favor of 'email' , or should the global computer network still be treated with a proper name? For more discussion, see Wikipedia, The Chicago Manual, and an article profiling Joseph Turow's de-capitalization efforts.

710 comments

  1. Next move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny


    ... we should decapitalize "Google".

    1. Re:Next move... by abb3w · · Score: 4, Funny
      No, that only happens if the SEC get antsy enough about the Playboy interview during the IPO quiet period.

      --
      //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
    2. Re:Next move... by GuyMannDude · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Google is a brand name. It should always be capitalized, just like Kleenex and Xerox. The fact that common usage has adapted these trademarked names as generic nouns doesn't change the fact that proper English dictates that they should be capitalized.

      The internet was never a brand name, thus, there was no need to capitalize it.

      GMD

    3. Re:Next move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once again, Apple is years ahead of the competition...

    4. Re:Next move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      you don't laugh much, do you?

    5. Re:Next move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do you open Windows or windows in your house ?

    6. Re:Next move... by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 2, Funny

      The internet was never a brand name .... .... .... /runs to the trademark office. ...
      was being the operative word ;)

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    7. Re:Next move... by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 5, Funny
      The internet was never a brand name, thus, there was no need to capitalize it.

      ...hwah? Ever heard of proper nouns? Is "Thomas MacKenzie Darby" a brand name? If so, where do you most frequently buy me?

      Next, you're gonna tell us that you can verb a noun so long as it's a registered trademark.

      Which would be seriously McDonald's'ed up.

      --

      Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    8. Re:Next move... by wamatt · · Score: 3, Funny

      So who writes pron with a '0' now anymore??

    9. Re:Next move... by slamb · · Score: 4, Informative
      The internet was never a brand name, thus, there was no need to capitalize it.

      Wow, you've been thoroughly commercialized. Brand names aren't the only things capitalized in English.

      Proper nouns (also called proper names) are names and denote unique entities. [...] Proper nouns are capitalized in English and most or all other languages that use the Latin alphabet; this is one easy way to recognize them.

      (from Wikipedia)

      We refer to it as the Internet. Corporations have intranets. The capitalization conveys meaning. Wired's usage is wrong.

    10. Re:Next move... by iksowrak · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Internet was never a brand name but the capital I Internet is used to differentiate between the global Internet and other internetworks or internets. There's more than one internet but only one Internet.

    11. Re:Next move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      teh google should loose it's 'G'

    12. Re:Next move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That would be if wired decided to spell it iNternet.

    13. Re:Next move... by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 5, Funny
      How about decapitalizing 'God' ?

      *gets struck by lightning*

    14. Re:Next move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same people that purposely spell "teh". 'Cuz being an idiot rocks!

    15. Re:Next move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking something like i|\|t3I2n3t would be more like it.

    16. Re:Next move... by ongeboren · · Score: 0

      Lets just follow "Die Wired Nachrichten" and make a "Die Google Suchemaschine"

      --
      First I wanted to be a chef. Then I wanted to be Napoleon. My ambitions have continued to grow ever since.
    17. Re:Next move... by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 4, Funny
      It worked for "digital". But then again, they couldn't afford the capital letter.

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    18. Re:Next move... by wfberg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Google is a brand name. It should always be capitalized, just like Kleenex and Xerox.

      No. Plenty of brands aren't capitalized, or not on the first letter (e.g. easyJet). Some are all-caps (SPAM); in fact the USPTO only lists brands in all-caps (because capitalization doesn't matter), except for logo's submitted by the owner. If you use your brand with no leading captital letter, that's all up to you; it doesn't bestow any more "brandiness" to a word to capitalize it.

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    19. Re:Next move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's only one Internet, therefore it gets capitalised, I rest my case.

    20. Re:Next move... by UserGoogol · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sarcasm is t3h awesome.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
    21. Re:Next move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Is "Thomas MacKenzie Darby" a brand name? If so, where do you most frequently buy me?

      At the jerk store, but they were all out of you last time I checked.

    22. Re:Next move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suchmaschine ohne "e", du Dummbatz.

    23. Re:Next move... by KilobyteKnight · · Score: 4, Funny

      i'm running low on thomas mackenzie darby. i couldn't find any at the dollar store. i checked everything's a dollar. radio shack was also out. wolf camera said they'd never heard of it. i may have to order some Online on the Web and have it fedexed.

      --
      When will Windows be ready for the desktop?
    24. Re:Next move... by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 0, Troll

      We refer to it as the Internet. Corporations have intranets. The capitalization conveys meaning. Wired's usage is wrong.

      Um... reread what you wrote. I don't necessarily agree with Wired's decision, but in that particular case, capitalization does not convey meaning. Spelling does. Internet vs intranet. So does the article: "the" vs "an". WTF are you talking about?

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    25. Re:Next move... by CommieOverlord · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The parent was wrong. So are you.

      Internet is no more a proper noun than is car, refrigerator, restaurant.

      You don't say "The Refrigerator is broken and the Food is bad, so let's jump in the Car and go to the Restaurant" do you?

    26. Re:Next move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of google, has anyone else noticed that the image on their site today has a guy who looks like he's sporting morning wood?

    27. Re:Next move... by whoever57 · · Score: 1
      Maybe we should just call the author "tony long". After all, he can't be the only "tony long" in the world, can he? Or particularly important?

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    28. Re:Next move... by JabberWokky · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Thus the fairly interesting tracking of usage. For instance, some works refer to the south (as in the American south), while others refer to the South, which gives it a stronger identity. The same thing can occasionally be seen for the west/the West. It certainly gives the voice of the author or publication a stance on how they view the region.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    29. Re:Next move... by jpmkm · · Score: 1

      What does it matter? You're their all-time best seller.

    30. Re:Next move... by u-235-sentinel · · Score: 1, Funny

      How about decapitalizing 'God' ?

      *gets struck by lightning*


      Now look at what you've done. You made Uncle Bill mad again. ;-)

      --
      Has Comcast disconnected your Internet account? Same here. You can read about it at http://comcastissue.blogspot.com
    31. Re:Next move... by TechnoPops · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is exactly right. Because, really, if someone says "internet," is there going to be any other one that you're going to confuse it with?

      --
      "Each time you smile, it'll only last awhile. Life may be scary, but it's only temporary."
    32. Re:Next move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Well, someone's going to make the joke about buying your mother, so I might as well...

    33. Re:Next move... by Demonspawn · · Score: 1

      Yes, but we do say The President.

      --Demonspawn

    34. Re:Next move... by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ironically enough, the Midwest is not even close to being the middle of the west -- the origins date to colonial times, so the Midwest is actually in the northeastern part of the United States.

    35. Re:Next move... by essreenim · · Score: 1

      and 'Anonymous Coward' ; )

    36. Re:Next move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You must relearn thy lessons"
      -you feel foolish

    37. Re:Next move... by Black+Perl · · Score: 4, Funny

      Next, you're gonna tell us that you can verb a noun so long as it's a registered trademark.

      Well, you just verbed the noun "verb."

      --
      bp
    38. Re:Next move... by 1u3hr · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Yes, but we do say The President.

      Who's "we"? Americans who think there is only one president in the world? Actually, there's well over 100 nations with presidents. And secondly, what's with capitalising "The"?

    39. Re:Next move... by nick_davison · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now look at what you've done. You made Uncle Bill mad again. ;-)

      That's uncle bill now.

    40. Re:Next move... by kantai · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you are referring to the West as a place, it is always capitalized. But if you are referring to it as a cardinal direction, it is never capitalized.

    41. Re:Next move... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1, Informative
      We refer to it as the Internet. Corporations have intranets. The capitalization conveys meaning. Wired's usage is wrong.

      There are scores of unique things which don't have their names capitalized. The earth. The sun. The internet is now one of those things. Initially, it was named the Internet because it wasn't unique. "Internet" was only capitalized in order to differentiate it from other large internetworks of computers back in the early days. Due to the fact that "the internet" itself has become the de facto wide scale global network, relegating the other networks to obscurity or supplanting them entirely, capitalization is unnecessary. The vast size of the internet has essentially given it "ownership" of the word. It is the internet now.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    42. Re:Next move... by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      That's also because texas isn't generally considered part of the Midwest or part of the South, so it pushes it up into the northern areas.

      --
      Evan "This message left to piss off texans"

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    43. Re:Next move... by trentblase · · Score: 1

      Internet 2.0!

    44. Re:Next move... by trentblase · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, the proper title is Friggin' Moron.

    45. Re:Next move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nope. Names in the bible should be capitalized, just as in any other work of fiction.

    46. Re:Next move... by Hobbex · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "The Internet" is the NAME of a single computer network. There are other networks with names, like Fidonet, Bitnet, Arpanet, etc, but most of them are not around anymore. Saying that it is no more a proper noun than car, refrigerator, or restaurant is simply wrong.

      If you had named your fridge "Old Whiny", your car "Betty", and your restaurant was named "The E-Coli Farm" it WOULD be correct to say:

      "Old Whiny is broken and the food is bad, so let's jump in Betty and go to The E-Coli Farm." (I skipped the food because few people name individual items of food.)

      That the The Internet happens to be a name in definite form does not make it any less of a name, just like The Netherlands is still the name of a country, and The Rocky Mountains is still the name of a mountain chain. (Note that "a rocky mountain" is something entirely different - just like "an internet.")

    47. Re:Next move... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      Obviously, "wired" magazine. There never was any reason to capitalise it....

    48. Re:Next move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If so, where do you most frequently buy me?

      I'd guess Paris, most likely along Champs-Elysees, given your McBashing. Soooo... how much do you go for?

    49. Re:Next move... by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      The West as a place is not always capitalized. Some style guides list American regions as being lowercase. I agree that it should be capitalized (along with others such as the South), but it is not always done.

      Of course when you are inside the region, it is much more commonly capitalized.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    50. Re:Next move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. That's witty. Do you write your own material?

      Or are you suggesting that proper names in non-fiction shouldn't be capitalized?

    51. Re:Next move... by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      You made Uncle Bill mad again.

      Uncle Bill is tolerant of your childish respelling.

      Unless, that is, you start to use lower case names to refer for things like

      1. windows
      2. "word"
      3. "explorer"
      in any computer related discussions.

      In your conversations always use approved vocabulary and context, eg:

      "The other day I was launching Microsoft Word ® , the ideal solution for today's fast-paced small businesses competing in a global information economy that provides their passion to my workplace, when the damn open-sores GPL-communist terrorist fscktard application reformatted my whole damn document!"
      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    52. Re:Next move... by cubicledrone · · Score: 1

      Ding. We have a winner.

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    53. Re:Next move... by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      I would say the Internet is a unique entity. While a vast entity - as far as I know there is only one Internet :)

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    54. Re:Next move... by Angostura · · Score: 4, Informative

      An internet is any connected series of networks. The Internet is the globally connnected system that we are currently using.

    55. Re:Next move... by optikSmoke · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ahhh, I'm glad at least one other person in this world has reasoning abilities. Slashdot needs a +50 Right, No More Replies Necessary moderation.

    56. Re:Next move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technically it is decapitalized. "God" referrs to an entity by name just like Athena or Zeus - except that God is sometimes referred to as the god with no name, so God is capitalized in place of His name. (Personally I think the capitalizations of all pronounce referring to God is a bit strange) Referring to 'gods' or 'a god' is not capitalized.

    57. Re:Next move... by sdo1 · · Score: 1
      It worked for "digital". But then again, they couldn't afford the capital letter.

      Kinda. They couldn't afford a "D" so they changed the name to "digicompaqard".

      I hear things are going well for the 4 ex-deccies still left in the company.

      -S

      --
      --- What parts of "shall make no law", "shall not be infringed", and "shall not be violated" don't you understand?
    58. Re:Next move... by Animekiksazz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No that's just Bush's title.

    59. Re:Next move... by donnyspi · · Score: 2, Informative
      You don't say "The Refrigerator is broken and the Food is bad, so let's jump in the Car and go to the Restaurant" do you?

      You do in German :-)

    60. Re:Next move... by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Look, if you want to call it "the internet," that's fine - as long as I can call it "the bible," "the white album," "Plymouth rock," etc. There are certain objects that we refer to by a descriptor which, while not formally a "proper noun," is in effect a proper noun. "The Bible" is the classic example; "The White Album" is another (as that is not the title of the album). I say "Internet" is also one of those. It's all in the Chicago Manual (not the Q&A, but the actual manual) discussing the word "Bible."

    61. Re:Next move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a cogent and valid argument, although there are other equally cogent arguments that contradict it. There are a number of unique entities whose names we don't capitalize. Take the sky, for instance. (I think the general rule is that names [i.e. descriptive epithets for a specific, unique thing] are capitalized; words [i.e. representations of concepts] are not.) Wired's argument seems to be that the term has become a part of the English language and is thus now a concept instead of a named entity. Or something. My head hurts.

    62. Re:Next move... by trentfoley · · Score: 5, Interesting

      An interesting point that I have considered many times.

      Those that want to keep "God" in the U.S. pledge, etc., claim that "God" is a generic term for a spiritual, not religious concept; and, therefore, does not endorse any specific religion. Bill O'Reilly holds this belief, as do many conservatives.

      Those that want to remove "God" from the U.S. pledge, etc., claim that "God" is the proper name for the Judeo-Christian supreme being and represents an endorsement by the U.S. government of a specific religion. Which is, of course, unconstitutional.

      My suggestion to mend this dilema has always been to uncapitalize "God" thereby removing the association with the Judeo-Christian supreme being. Hell, I'd even be for making it plural... One nation, under gods, indivisible...

      My unrealistic suggestion is to change "God" to "the laws of physics".

    63. Re:Next move... by adamh526 · · Score: 1

      "Internet" and "internet" were both defined around the same time. The "Internet" is a group of TCP/IP connected "internets." To me, that makes the "Internet" more of a brand name than you think. It depends on whether you're talking about THE "Internet" or AN "internet". Actually, I guess it doesn't anymore :P

    64. Re:Next move... by GuyWithLag · · Score: 1

      Damn, I read that as 'we should decapitate "Google" '...

    65. Re:Next move... by norle · · Score: 1

      We refer to the birth control pill as "the pill", but that's not capitlized.

    66. Re:Next move... by Fascist+Christ · · Score: 1

      There's more than one internet but only one Internet.

      This is true, yet it ignores one important detail. The laws of language are not permenant. If they were, we would be speaking some ancient language. However, language is dynamic, constantly changing as widespread use changes.

      This goes for grammar, definitions, pronunciation, etc. The only factor that matters is that other people understand what you are saying. If the general population gets into the habit of decapitalizing the "i" without confusing the meaning of the word, then that usage will prevail.

      For example, there is a document from the 1700's that reads: "We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union..."

      --
      TodayTM BillyJoelTM GoogleTMd for StitchTMes due to WindowsTM while RollerbladeTMing with an AppleTM and a PopsicleTM
    67. Re:Next move... by jbarr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nope. I beg to differ. There is a big difference between "an internet" and "the Internet"--the former being a general term describing inter-networked computers; the latter describimg the entity that evolved out of Darpa's network which we all currently use to exchange email, surf the web, etc. There are countless "internets" around the world, but there is only one "Internet".

      It's similar to the German "autobahn" which translates to "motorway" but the "Autobahn" is a specific network of roadways.

      And who made Wired magazine the technical grammar police? Just becaus they think it's cool doesn't make it correct.

      --
      My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    68. Re:Next move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I personally feel that the whole separation of church and state was that the President is also not the religious leader and vice versa. Government does not dictate your morality, just like religion doesn't dictate what is lawful. You can't really separate the two though. As a professor of American History told me once, anyone who thinks religion and government are separate in America is blind as you suggest the constitution mandates. (not saying you are blind, I assume you recognize this fact as well) Granted a minister could be elected to a civil post, but its not an automagic thing just cause he is the minister. It makes for an effective way to allow religious freedom so that every four years everyone didn't have to convert to the flavor of the week.

      Believe what you will, but the people who started the country believed in God, and that it was his providence that helped them succeed in becoming their own country. I personally believe that God and science are mutually exclusive. Sure if you look at the people on TV preaching for filthy lucre, etc. I don't exactly know how everything works together, but then it isn't really that important as to the point of this life being to live, have experiences, grow spiritually (hopefully) and return to live with God again.

    69. Re:Next move... by w128jad · · Score: 1

      the Internet is an internet. Maybe they found another one?

      --
      w2^7me out.
    70. Re:Next move... by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      While I think I understand what you're saying, I don't understand how your comment relates to my post.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    71. Re:Next move... by untaken_name · · Score: 1

      Why would not including us in the Midwest or the South piss us off? Have you ever been here? We don't consider ourselves part of either, either.

    72. Re:Next move... by UberPfloyd · · Score: 1

      To me this is a logical step. It reminds me of that great article a while back about Telephone Etiquite http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/07/09/214 221&tid=133. All over the handbook is Telephone capitalized. Who would capitalize it now?

    73. Re:Next move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wired is nowhere near as important as it thinks it is. Ignore them. This was a moronic idea.

      Internet and internet reference two different things. Pretend you don't have a cable modem, dsl, Tx, or any other such thing. You do have a couple of computers wired up through a switch. You also have a wireless access point that connects to a couple of different neighbor's homes in ad-hoc mode, where they have more or less the same setup (although you can also substitute a router and string cable if you'd like to). You don't have Internet access, but you do have internet access.

      See the difference? While internet referrs to any collection of LANs that are tied together to form a larger segmented network, Internet referrs to the largest such network.

    74. Re:Next move... by sharkdba · · Score: 1

      ...The Rocky Mountains is still the name of a mountain chain. (Note that "a rocky mountain" is something entirely different - just like "an internet.")

      Very good analogy. "Rocky Mountains" implies a specific place, while "rocky mountains" simply describes mountains currently discussed (not to mention that Rocky Mountains actually are rocky, so it's perfectly OK to say: "The Rocky Mountains are really rocky.").

      --
      The purpose of life is to find the purpose of life.
    75. Re:Next move... by 503 · · Score: 1

      According the the Canadian Press and most style books I've read, you capitalize specific regions.

      "The South lost to the North."
      "I went to the South Pacific last Christmas."

      Directions and positions are lowercased.

      "Head south for two kilometres."
      "The southern states have a distinctive accent."

    76. Re:Next move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Internet is the globally connnected system that we are currently using.

      And how do you know I'm not using another internet, such as Internet2? Ah, because it is not connected.

      Wired seems to have forgotten that there are multiple internets.

      There are many suns, but the Sun refers to the name of one particular one. Same thing. The Internet is the name of the most popular internet.

    77. Re:Next move... by MobyTurbo · · Score: 1
      An internet is any connected series of networks. The Internet is the globally connnected system that we are currently using.
      That's exactly what people said on Usenet (or is it USENET?) in the early 90s before the Web took off. You know what though? People were, even then, not capitalizing or non-capitalizing "Internet" properly.
    78. Re:Next move... by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 2, Informative
      There is no such thing as an "internet." There's this really big network of networks, which someone happened to name Internet. They could have named it Fred or Barney, but they chose Internet. It's not capitalized because there's only one, but because Internet is its name.

      If you think that's wrong, if you agree with Wired (excuse me, wired) magazine, consider this:

      "ship" is a generic term, therefore we should not capitalize the names of ships. Call it the u.s.s. enterprise, then.

      "planet" is a generic term. Call this place earth.

      "country" and "nation" and "city" are generic terms. Call them the athens olympics.

      Hell (i mean, hell), let's just eliminate uppercase altogether.

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    79. Re:Next move... by thrash242 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How many refrigerators, cars, and restaurants are there in the world? None stand out enough to have a proper name. The Internet does. There's only one global internet and it certainly stands out amongst other networks. Thus the Internet.

    80. Re:Next move... by Aumaden · · Score: 1

      You're for sale? Wow, I didn't know any politicians read /.!

    81. Re:Next move... by EvilAlien · · Score: 1
      You would if you were German, and English is derived in part from German roots. Thats not important, I'm merely being pedantic.

      What is important is understanding if [iI]nternet is a proper noun or not. If "The Internet" is the name given to one particularly large collection of interconnected networks, rather than that collection merely being "an internet".

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    82. Re:Next move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "My unrealistic suggestion is to change 'God' to 'the laws of physics'."

      Don't you foist your silly beliefs on me!

    83. Re:Next move... by legojenn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So, I guess when the aide to our (then) Prime Minister called Mr Bush a moron, she was just addressing him by his title....

      --
      I make a reasonable middle-class wage by going to work and not spamming blogs with scams.
    84. Re:Next move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Question regarding your sig: how is the arrest of Bobby Fisher, who is being deported from Japan due to an invalid passport and is wanted for breaking sanctions against Yugoslavia in 1992, related in any way to the War on Terror? You may want to fix that.

    85. Re:Next move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > My unrealistic suggestion is to change "God" to
      > "the laws of physics".
      >
      It doesn't quite cut it. When you say that your nation is under "God" what you're really saying is that morality and ethics are important to the nation. While some people subscribe to the notion that ethics are relative, the truth of the matter is that there is a common denominator that all major religions and humanistic philosphies subscribe to. (e.g. It's wrong to steal and kill. Some version of 'the Golden Rule' and mercy.)

      Physics and natural laws are both amoral and nonethical. Things like "the weak should be at the mercy of the strong" and "cheating is okay if it gets you ahead" are two obvious consequences of ignoring morality and ethics.

      If you're going to get rid of "one nation under God", I'd prefer replace it with "one nation bound by good ethical standards".

    86. Re:Next move... by jrockway · · Score: 1

      Most people in a google search for "the Pill" seem to think you should capitalize it. Just because you're doing it wrong doesn't mean it's wrong :-)

      --
      My other car is first.
    87. Re:Next move... by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      I was referring to the fact that I capitalized the regions and did not capitalize the word "texas". It was actually a typo I left in place for the tagline.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    88. Re:Next move... by westlake · · Score: 1
      There are other networks with names, like Fidonet, Bitnet, Arpanet, etc, but most of them are not around anymore.

      ...and that is the problem.
      The "networks with names" are slipping irretrievably into the past.

    89. Re:Next move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about decapitalizing 'God' ?

      You can, but then it doesn't mean the same thing.

      It's 'God' if you're referring to the god God.

      It's 'god' if you're just referring to any old god. In particular, "In god we trust." is gramatically incorrect. (unless you're referring to "god" as a substance, which would be odd) It would have to be "a god", "some god", "the god", "$god", etc.

      The tricky bit comes because there are so many different Christian Gods. Supposedly they are all the same god and at most one exists, but they are not all identical. So you can have "your god" and "your God" and both are logically correct, although the second carries additional information. (ie, your god is God, or at least one of him)

    90. Re:Next move... by B747SP · · Score: 2, Insightful
      We refer to it as the Internet. Corporations have intranets. The capitalization conveys meaning. Wired's usage is wrong.

      Technically, there's no such thing as an 'intranet' in my book. The 'intranet' word is a non word dreamed up by some tosser in marketing. (I got a telephone call from the new 'Web Manager' (another common type of tosser) the other day. Introduced himself, "Hi, I'm new here". Wanted to know my email address (everyone where I work has an email address of the form firstname.lastname@domain.tld!), said he couldn't find my details on the 'intranet'. I wrote him off as a tosser right there - he'll be the first against the wall when the revolution comes!)

      You get two types of networks. a 'Local Area Network' - a bunch of hosts wired together with switches and hubs, all in the same collision domain. When you join a bunch of LANs together with routers, you get an 'internetwork', commonly abbreviated to 'internet'.

      The biggest and best known 'internet' is the 'Internet'.

      We agree, Wired's usage is wrong - lower case 'internet' means the office WAN, nothing more.

      --
      I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
    91. Re:Next move... by B747SP · · Score: 1
      This is exactly right. Because, really, if someone says "internet," is there going to be any other one that you're going to confuse it with?

      Yup, *millions* of them. Any network with more than one collision domain is, by definition, an 'internetwork' - commonly abbrev. to 'internet'. Now in english you can usually extrapolate the subject of a sentence by looking at context, but it's not foolproof. Wired's usage is wrong.

      --
      I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
    92. Re:Next move... by vistic · · Score: 1
      "Those that want to keep "God" in the U.S. pledge, etc., claim that "God" is a generic term for a spiritual, not religious concept; and, therefore, does not endorse any specific religion."


      I still think that's unfair as it endorses spirituality... atheism may be a "non-religion" but for fairness issues like this I think it needs to be treated as a religion so that it gets equal consideration.

      I'm reminded of when there was the big debate about the pledge of allegience, and a coworker and I were arguing about God being on money. She suggested that to be fair, we leave "In God We Trust" on half the money, and on the other half we put nothing. I told her that doesn't cut it, and that to be fair we would need to put in "God We Trust" on half and "There is no god" on the other half. Or maybe give a third to each of those and another third leave blank. She didn't like the idea.
    93. Re:Next move... by Omestes · · Score: 1

      There are many suns in the universe, but our Earth revolves around the Sun. Many planets have earth, but there is only one Earth.

      Just because the United States' culture is becoming global, and supplanting all other cultures, it has become unnecessary to capitalise the united states. Even if the Internet is huge, does not grant it common noun status, being that there are still other internets out there (Internet2, MILnet, etc...)

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    94. Re:Next move... by libcoder · · Score: 1

      Harry Shearer: "That's what the military does, it verbs up the nouns." I love Harry Shearer.

      --
      RIAA and the MPAA, putting the "F U" in "fair use".
    95. Re:Next move... by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Point is, the OP used the term 'intranet' instead of 'internet'. :-)

    96. Re:Next move... by untaken_name · · Score: 1

      Ahh. Yes, there are those who would be offended by that. Also, there are people who are offended by even stupider shit everywhere these days. Hopefully you'll catch some. Carry on, good sir. Pardon the interruption. :)

    97. Re:Next move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...claim that "God" is the proper name for the Judeo-Christian supreme being...

      WTF?!?!? If God is the proper name then the Christian French, Italians, Germans and Lebanese would also use the name "God." But they don't, the French say "Dieu" the Italians, "Deus" etc.

      That has to be the most self-centered piece of rubbish I've ever seen come out of the USA. Bunch of barbarians!

    98. Re:Next move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The subject was the Constitution of the United States of America. I believe that English is the proper language to use in this instance.

      Also, you apparently do not understand what a "proper name" is. In English, proper names are capitalized. Proper, in this respect, does not mean appropriate and correct.

      Read all about it at wikipedia and educate yourself so that you appear more than the oaf that you are. Barbarians, indeed.

    99. Re:Next move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a fucktard.

    100. Re:Next move... by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      "Verb" can be verbed when talking about verbing; it makes it clearer.

    101. Re:Next move... by perlchild · · Score: 1

      The Internet(capital) was a specific instance of internet(no capital) a group of interconnected networks. Now the Internet(capital) has been so successful, it's replaced, all the other "internets" and no, we shouldn't not use the capital. We should just never use the lowercase.

      It's the exact opposite of what happened to Kleenex, the paper tissues being replaced by a single brand, because it was so superior.

    102. Re:Next move... by thgreatoz · · Score: 2, Funny

      In the words of Robin Williams:
      "One nation, under Canada, above Mexico."

      --
      When their numbers dwindled from 50 to 8, the dwarves began to suspect Hungry.
    103. Re:Next move... by Jo+Owen · · Score: 1

      Did he say that _all_ brandnames should be capitalised?

      No. He said that the brandnames of Google, Kleenex and Xerox all have capitals, and so should always be capitalised.

    104. Re:Next move... by prockcore · · Score: 1

      We refer to it as the Internet.

      That doesn't matter. We refer to it as the world, and the universe. We don't capitalize those either.

    105. Re:Next move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > In the words of Robin Williams:
      > "One nation, under Canada

      Canadians are Gods! ;-)

    106. Re:Next move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) he was giving an example of a similar word where you hardly ever see the capitalization. anyone with a modicum of intelligence would instantly see the connection and start considering how Internet and internet are different as well.

      2) maybe it was a typo, again it's easy to see the point

      3) do you always work so hard to misunderstand people? I'm tempted to mod you a troll.

    107. Re:Next move... by wkitchen · · Score: 1
      "The Internet" is the NAME of a single computer network. There are other networks with names, like Fidonet, Bitnet, Arpanet, etc, but most of them are not around anymore. Saying that it is no more a proper noun than car, refrigerator, or restaurant is simply wrong.
      Fido is still active, believe it or not.
      That the The Internet happens to be a name in definite form does not make it any less of a name, just like The Netherlands is still the name of a country, and The Rocky Mountains is still the name of a mountain chain. (Note that "a rocky mountain" is something entirely different - just like "an internet.")
      As another example, I once had a dog named Quadruped.
    108. Re:Next move... by phillymacmike · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's DARPA's, not Darpa's--since this whole discussion is pathetically pedantic.

      And Wired has it wrong, but they wrote one of the earliest and best authoritative style manuals for the Internet, so it makes sense to hear them out.

      --
      _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _>8
      Too many errors in one post (make fewer).
    109. Re:Next move... by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      But my post indicated two differences: the article distinguishes in both cases. Even if the inter-intra distinction was a typo. The only thing that capitalization indicates is whether the word is a proper noun.

      I waren't trolling, whether or not I'm right.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    110. Re:Next move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, we do. The Universe.

    111. Re:Next move... by achurch · · Score: 1

      So who writes pron with a '0' now anymore??

      Everybody! That's a lower-case zero, you dolt!

      (-:

    112. Re:Next move... by La_Maudite · · Score: 1
      One nation, under gods, indivisible...


      What about those believe that there is no "God" or "god" or "gods"?
    113. Re:Next move... by dominhus · · Score: 1

      "The Internet" is the NAME of a single computer network. There are other networks with names, like Fidonet, Bitnet, Arpanet, etc, but most of them are not around anymore. Saying that it is no more a proper noun than car, refrigerator, or restaurant is simply wrong.

      Siprnet is another name of a computer network and it's still in use (although not so widely). I'm against the decapitalizing of "Internet."

    114. Re:Next move... by xsbellx · · Score: 1

      Technically, there's no such thing as an 'intranet' in my book. The 'intranet' word is a non word dreamed up by some tosser in marketing.

      While I would agree that technically there is no such thing as an intranet, practically, there is.

      Fortunately, language allows for change. The world of technology advances first, then language catches up with new terms or new definitions for existing terms. The debate over internet/intranet should not be purely technical. Intranet conveys the concept of internal/members only access to resources (applications/data/printers - whatever). This is simply the addition of a well used/well know prefix to a word with new meaning.

      I know this is /. so the following may be new to many so please bear with me. Many of us remember grade school and high school. Both of these fine institutions offered, at least in my day, both INTRAMURAL and INTERMURAL athletics. Intermural athletics involved competition with the "enemy" (other schools). On the hand, intramural athletics involved competition between groups within the school.

      It really should not be a leap-of-faith to see how those terms migrated into the lexicon of computers and networks.

      --
      If VISTA is the answer, you didn't understand the question
    115. Re:Next move... by Mad+Marlin · · Score: 2, Funny
      You do in German :-)

      The English Language and the German Language haven't been the same since the Eleventh Century, when a bunch of Germans from France got tired of living that close to the French, and therefore decided to go conquer England instead. They kept the French Language because it is pretty.

    116. Re:Next move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is exactly right. Because, really, if someone says "internet," is there going to be any other one that you're going to confuse it with?

      AOL?

    117. Re:Next move... by Hobbex · · Score: 1

      Networks with names that are still around: The Usenet, Janet, Freenet, Sunet, Milnet, The World Wide Web, Internet2. I could go on. Most these are either a part of, or run on top of, The Internet, but they are still networks with names.

      Just because The United Nations has overtaken all other global unions of countries, doesn't suddenly make it the united nations.

    118. Re:Next move... by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 1

      Autobahn is a bad example, I'm afraid. It translates to "motorway," as you said, but does not refer to a specific network of roadways, just as "freeway" is not capitalized when used by itself. Autobahn is *always* capitalized in German, because that's how German treats all nouns.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    119. Re:Next move... by wfberg · · Score: 1

      Unless I'm contractually bound to do so, no. Just like you can spell Easyjet like so if you feel you should because it's a proper noun (remember, there is no Law Of English); or spam in lowercase because all-caps just looks silly, or if you're using it as a verb for sending unsollicited mail.

      Trademark owners only own their trademark for their exclusive use as a mark in trade. It let's them stamp their branding on their product, and prohibits competitors (or their resalers) from using the same name or logo.

      That doesn't mean they get to control the use of the word. If I feel like saying kleenex or xerox, even referring to a competitor, that's just fine and dandy as long as I'm not in the business of selling paper towels or copying machines.

      If capitalization was an issue, you could brand your cheap imitation product "rolex" instead of "Rolex" and get away with it.

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    120. Re:Next move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the Earth, the Mars, the Sun. It's not 'the World', because there are many worlds - 'world' is not the name of our planet.

    121. Re:Next move... by Stuart+Gibson · · Score: 1

      Although it is worrying when a press outlet is suddenly charged with dictating our language rules. Just because wired has decided to do this does not mean the rest of the world, especially The Geeks who understand why it should be capitalised in the first place, should also adopt such sloppy practises.

      As an aside, although new terms do enter the langauge on a yearly basis (mostly to describe things not previously extant) the actual rules of language seem to be settling down and not changing, most likely due to the archiving of the rule (so we now have them "written in stone" as it were) and also the existence of mass education where people are taught the rules and any variation is "wrong".

      Stuart

      --
      It's all fun and games until a 200' robot dinosaur shows up and trashes Neo-Tokyo... Again
    122. Re:Next move... by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      My suggestion to mend this dilema has always been to uncapitalize "God" thereby removing the association with the Judeo-Christian supreme being. Hell, I'd even be for making it plural... One nation, under gods, indivisible...

      Suppose it said 'one nation, watching football'. Some guys who don't watch football and think the game's pretty silly really argue that this should be taken off, since it violates the separation of sport and state.

      Now suppose it is argued that football does not necessarily mean gridiron: it's a generic term, which could equally well mean soccer or rugby or Aussie rules or Gaelic football... It's very inclusive, referring to a generic ball game and not any particular form of football that a particular group might adhere to. Great.

      But what if you prefer cricket? Sucks to be you, I suppose... And as for those nerds who don't follow any sports at all, well, I don't know that they should be considered as citizens, nor should they be considered patriots. This is one nation watching football.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    123. Re:Next move... by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

      Mod this guy up and keep modding. He's nailed it.

      There should be no grammar discussion here today, just a discussion re Wired's perennial pretentiousness. A magazine -- a serious, well-respected magazine, let alone Wired -- cannot simply just make capitalization changes like some fairy tale king proclaiming his birthday a national holiday. Now, truth be told, ten years ago, when Wired was the "It" thing for IT, it influenced the emerging "e-culture" merely by virtue of its coolness. It's calculated attempt to re-assert that influence here in the 21st century is like National Geographic proclaiming that bell-bottoms are back in style.

      If Wired really, really wanted to do some good for the English language, they would reach out to the high schoolers, college kids, and bubble-dwelling "cyber-pundits" in their readership and try to convince them to stop using the word "meme" all the time. Too much to ask for? Probably...

    124. Re:Next move... by SkiifGeek · · Score: 1

      Probably too late for mod points, but to answer your humorous suggestion with a serious answer -

      God implies a god that is addressed as God as one of his / her titles.

      god implies a supernatural being with the smiting and the wailing and the gnashing of teeth.

      AFAIK it is only really the Christian, Muslim and Jewish faith that calls their god God (amongst other names).

      It is similar to the Aboriginal people in Australia (although there are many tribes). In common usage, an aborigine / aboriginal person is a native of a country / region, but an Aborigine / Aboriginal is a native of Australia.

    125. Re:Next move... by MacGod · · Score: 1
      We refer to it as the Internet. Corporations have intranets. The capitalization conveys meaning. Wired's usage is wrong.

      So, you you capitalise the Moon? When you take your car the the Highway to the Movies, and get outraged at the Price of the Tickets, do you yell at the Teller?

      Yes, proper nouns are capitalised in the English language, but you have provided no evidence that internet, web or net are proper nouns. Not everything your preface with the is a proper noun. The word internet does not denote a name, place, or anything else which would indicate a proper noun. It is just a regular noun, and lowercase is therefore appropriate.

      Proper nouns are unique entities, yes, but not all unique entities are proper nouns. The sun, the moon, the solar system, the universe are all uncapitalised words.

      --
      "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one " -Albert Einstein
    126. Re:Next move... by Mr_Dyqik · · Score: 1

      I use GNU/OpenWallHoles in my walls

    127. Re:Next move... by TFGeditor · · Score: 1

      > We refer to it as the Internet. Corporations have intranets. The capitalization conveys meaning. Wired's usage is wrong. We refer to it as the ocean, the "world wide interconnected waterway." Wired is correct to de-cap internet.

      --
      Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.
    128. Re:Next move... by kunudo · · Score: 1

      When I went to an american school (me=foreigner), I found that pledge to be rather silly (well, all the other students did too, except for the hick who wore the yellow ribbon (is it still in use?) and an army jacket). I mean, very very silly. What other country would do something like that every day? (North Korea? China?)

      And a friend of mine said schools that dropped the not-so-optional-then pledge would recieve less public funds, is that true?

      -1 flamebait

    129. Re:Next move... by PMuse · · Score: 1

      Wired's usage is wrong.

      You would think, of all people, that wired would recognize the importance of differentiating proper nouns from ordinary ones.

      --
      "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
    130. Re:Next move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As another example, I once had a dog named Quadruped.

      Does he have the heart of a champion

    131. Re:Next move... by NaDrew · · Score: 1
      While a vast entity - as far as I know there is only one Internet
      I would say it is more half-vast, myself.
      --
      Vista:XPSP2::ME:98SE
  2. finally... really... by ack154 · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Wired also answers the big question:
    Why? The simple answer is because there is no earthly reason to capitalize any of these words. Actually, there never was.
    Finally... at least someone will admit it.

    So will the "title" for the Slashdot topic icons be changed to reflect this? Or would that be considered a "principal word"?
    1. Re:finally... really... by Nos. · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've been really annoyed by things like MS-Word that would always automatically capitalize the "i" in "internet". I never found a reason to capitalize works like internet, web, etc. unless grammar demanded it (like starting a sentence). The question now is, how long is it going to take the rest of the world to catch on.

    2. Re:finally... really... by grub · · Score: 1


      The only reason was marketting. Remember that cruddy "Internet in a Box"? If you don't capitalize it, you don't have a named brand.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    3. Re:finally... really... by Curtman · · Score: 1

      Or pre-pending E to things. Email I can deal with, but whenever people say things like e-commerce, or e-business I just want to punch them.

    4. Re:finally... really... by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think the constant use of the definite article "The" hooked most people into the capital "I". It's The Internet. There are not multiple internets (secure military and financial nets notwithstanding), there is only The Internet. There is no internet but THE Internet and Wired magazine is probably not its prophet, though I'm sure they like to think they are.

      Probably has a lot to do with non-tech people not understanding the difference between a WAN and a LAN, and just referring to everything as an "internet".

      Think I need to cut back on my coffee consumption.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    5. Re:finally... really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Sigh... Another example of annoying brokenness in MS-Word. The non-capitalized "internet" referns to a network of networks. The "Internet" (capital) is a particular (global) instance of such a network.

    6. Re:finally... really... by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Well it really matters on how you use it. Like you can say my internet connection is slow today. Or WOW the internet is cool.

      But other times I might say.

      My local network was just bridged to connect me to The Internet!

      Damn that sounds weird, you know I was in all agreement that Internet should be capitolized untill I starting writing this comment :)

      But I definatly do not think any points should be take away for use of the term Internet.

    7. Re:finally... really... by Theatetus · · Score: 2, Informative

      I thought the point was that my 192.168.1.0/24 behind my linksys access point is "an internet". The 66.35.250.0/24 slashdot is on is "an internet" (unlike mine, a publicly routeable one). An internet is any network that uses, surprise surprise, the "internet protocol".

      The largest internet, the one consisiting of all publicly routeable internets, was (until today at least) called "the Internet". Like most proper nounse, it is (was) capitalized.

      --
      All's true that is mistrusted
    8. Re:finally... really... by Skidge · · Score: 1

      A couple of years ago, my company issued the developers a style guide that told us how we were suppose to spell, punctuate, and capitalize certain things. Not only was it full of "e-" things, but they all were followed by capitalized words. I.e.,

      e-Mail
      e-Business
      e-Commerce

      Ugh. Not only was it ugly, but it was a pain to type and maintain consistency, since all of us were used to "e-mail", etc.

      I think they've since dropped the capitalization weirdness, thankfully.

    9. Re:finally... really... by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      Exactly what I was thinking. If you use the definite article, you need to capitalize it. In that formation, its a proper noun. The term itself refers to the interconnection of several, distinct networks. If all military networks were connected together, but had no connection to any other network, they'd become a seperate internet of their own, as would something similar for banking. This isn't done simply because the ammount of infrastructure needed for support would be prohibitively expensive. There's also too many advantages to being connected for anybody to seriously consider building a parallel network. I suspect that over the long run, The Internet will be like The Highlander: There can be only one!

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    10. Re:finally... really... by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 1

      And you should. Same for the "i-" and "cyber-" prefixes.

      And anyone who markets an "extreme" product should simply be taken out and shot.

    11. Re:finally... really... by fitten · · Score: 1

      Spoken like someone who (at most) taught themselves networking.

      See other posts as to the difference between The Internet and an internet. Or... take a few networking classes.

    12. Re:finally... really... by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

      More important than anything else, why does this actually matter one way or the other ?

    13. Re:finally... really... by ack154 · · Score: 1

      I didn't say there wasn't a difference or that I didn't know what it was. I just think it's a stupid thing to capitalize (proper name or not).

      And I've had plenty of education, thank you.

    14. Re:finally... really... by chriscrick · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, there are such creatures, exactly as you suggest. The American and allied military and intelligence agencies run a SECRET-level internet called SIPRNET (Secret Internet Protocol Router NETwork) and a TOP SECRET-level one called JDISS (Joint Deployable Intelligence Support System). They're completely separate from the Internet (the publicly accessible one), but they're sprawling, worldwide internets connecting tens of thousands of machines.

      Chris

    15. Re:finally... really... by Curtman · · Score: 1

      Someone please tap Big Blue on the shoulder, and tell them how stupid it really is. And quit sending me that damn e-newsletter, or you won't be getting my e-business.

    16. Re:finally... really... by phoenix321 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think it was a rather logical reason: if there is only one instance of this thing and another one is impossible or unlikely to exist now or in the near future, it should be written capitalized.

      So as long as logic prohibits the simultaneos existence of maybe two "internets", it will be written with a capital "I". Same thing goes for God - only one instance, never will be a second one beside it/Him or whatever. Applies to trademarks, as they denote a certain brand that is "unique" in some way. Even if there could be two "Fords" or three "Cadillacs", it's not possible to have a "Ford" that doesn't come from "Ford", whatever good or bad the connotation may be that comes with that name. Tautology aside, I bet that even goes for "I", because there's only one "I" for me. "You" is often not capitalized like it was in the past, but in formal letters it still is.

      Strange thing I as a German has to tell you, because in German, all nouns are always written capitalized. (Hmm, all countries and languages are also written with capital letters in English. Same property: they are unique, too).

    17. Re:finally... really... by wo1verin3 · · Score: 1

      >>The only reason was marketting. Remember that
      >>cruddy "Internet in a Box"? If you don't
      >>capitalize it, you don't have a named brand

      First, let us be glad this debate isn't about spelling.

      Second, what does that have to do with anything? 'Internet in a Box' was a product name. If you market 'Shit in a Box' the S in 'Shit' is still is in capital because it is part of the product name but outside of that context that rule doesn't apply. (Off topic, Internet in a Box SHOULD have been named....)

    18. Re:finally... really... by bhima · · Score: 1
      I was going to point this (about Nouns) out and then I thought...

      Wait! this is Slashdot!

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    19. Re:finally... really... by Efreet · · Score: 1

      There is no internet but The Internet, and Google is its prophet.

      I think thats the start of a new religion. After all, is there anything that google does not know? You may try to post a counterexample, but then it will be on the web and lo, Google will now know it.

      --
      This sig wasn't worth reading, was it.
    20. Re:finally... really... by dead+sun · · Score: 1
      Unless you're networked to a bunch of other networks you aren't part of an internet. Since you can reach slashdot it's apparent you are, but your internal subnet is not an internet on its own by any means. You have what is refered to as a network. An internet is a network of networks.

      Most networks have no reason to be internetworked to another network, excepting through "the Internet" so they can reach other publicly internetworked networks and their publically available services, e.g. HTTP or SMTP. However, there's even further semantic distinction at a network of networks level.

      For instance several large companies have branches all over with multiple servers and multiple seperate networks. These tend to be termed intranets since they're internal to a single entity and are networks of networks. I believe this is just a subclassification of internet though, since it clearly fits the definition of an internet as well.

      If for some reason a bunch of banks got together and privately networked their networks they would have another internet, but still not "the Internet". They have a network of networks. Both private intranets and internets seem to be disappearing as companies find they can send their data over "the Internet" in some secure form for much less money than by holding private lines.

      "the Internet" as it seems to be used is a term for the internetworking of networks that any network can be a part of. Given that it is the largest and by far most globally important internet, I think that the capitalization isn't a bad thing.

      --
      If not now, when?
    21. Re:finally... really... by trentblase · · Score: 1
      Or pre-pending E to things. Email I can deal with, but whenever people say things like e-commerce, or e-business I just want to punch them.

      Back in the day, I hated it when people used email as a noun. When you e-mail something, you send an e-letter. Or, put another way, in real life you don't "send somebody a mail". To me, saying "send an email" sounded just as bad as "send a mail". I preferred to say "I'll email you" to get around this until common usage kicked in and the phrase no longer bothered me.

    22. Re:finally... really... by trentblase · · Score: 1
      If you use the definite article, you need to capitalize it.

      You're right... this comment is the Shit.

    23. Re:finally... really... by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "An internet is any network that uses, surprise surprise, the "internet protocol"."

      And I suppose "england" is any area of the world where they speak english.

    24. Re:finally... really... by burns210 · · Score: 1

      If you are refering to THE Internet or THE Web, then they are proper nouns and SHOULD be capitalized. If you are refering to a corporation's private internet(intranet) then you do not capitalize it, because there are many of those networks, there is only one Internet.

  3. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    And this is News? err sorry. news

  4. in other developments by ackthpt · · Score: 1, Funny
    it's now 'slashdot' please drop the capital 'S'

    "it's all ordinary now"

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:in other developments by Smidge204 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I suppose people using "/." have been doing this all along, else it would be "?."

      =Smidge=

    2. Re:in other developments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's now 'slashdot' please drop the capital 'S'

      There's no 's' in /.

    3. Re:in other developments by Echnin · · Score: 1

      Merkin... On my Norwegian keyboard, "/" is typed by holding shift and pressing "7".

      --
      Lalala
    4. Re:in other developments by mrph · · Score: 1

      it would be "/:", you insensitive clod!

  5. What about website? by Zygote-IC- · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Can we please make that one word, like most of those who actually build them do?

    1. Re:What about website? by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Can we please make that one word, like most of those who actually build them do?

      Can we PLEASE drop the 'www' in everything?

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:What about website? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, because they're sites on the web.

    3. Re:What about website? by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      Can we PLEASE drop the 'www' in everything?

      What would you use instead? web.slashdot.org? Putting DNS A records on the domain name like slashdot.org does just seems sloppy to me. I know most people do it these days, but there's a reason DNS is hierarchical. hostname.domain.tld or hostname.subdomain.domain.tld is logical.

    4. Re:What about website? by barzok · · Score: 4, Insightful

      and stop calling them "sights" unless they're tourist attractions to be looked at and photographed.

    5. Re:What about website? by cortana · · Score: 1

      Should I mail you at akinghtcowboy@mail.slashdot.org? :)

      This dilemma is resolved by the SRV DNS RR type. "Give me the endpoint for the 'web' service of 'domain.example':

      _web._tcp.domain.example. IN SRV 5 0 80 webserver.domain.example

      SRV is like a more generalised form of MX; in fact you could declare that MX was deprecated in favour of _mail._tcp.domain.example. Everyone seems to be happy to contiue using A records for web sites, however.

    6. Re:What about website? by saider · · Score: 1


      Go ahead, you'll find that either your browser will find it by prepending the www or the target network will know to route port 80 connects to their webserver, port 21 to their ftp server, etc.

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    7. Re:What about website? by paintballluvr · · Score: 1

      stop calling them "sights" unless they're tourist attractions to be looked at and photographed

      As opposed to pages to be turned in a book?

    8. Re:What about website? by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      No, I want to go the other way. I want to have stupidly long DNS names.

      web.fred.cs.fnord.mit.ed.ma.us

      Fred's webserver on the CS department <fnord/> of MIT, an educational institution in Massachusetts, a state of the United States.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
    9. Re:What about website? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I read that at first "terrorist attractions", my ass. I think George Osama Bush has won.

    10. Re:What about website? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hehe. I have a bad habit of using "site" when I mean "sight". IRC rots the typing skills, I swear.

    11. Re:What about website? by burns210 · · Score: 1

      if a domain's primary/sole purpose is a single service, it makes sense to default to that. If I host a wesbite, and my domain is used soley for that website(no email, ftp, etc...) then why add the extra layer of www to signify World-Wide Web? It is redundant.

  6. im of the opinion that by GillBates0 · · Score: 3, Funny
    should the global computer network still be treated with a proper name?

    the intarweb should still be treated with teh proper name

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
  7. Proper Noun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I don't think it's possible to refer to the Internet without providing a 'the' in the front... is it? Otherwise, there are many possible interconnected networks you'd practically require a proper noun to differentiate...

  8. The internet by nooch · · Score: 1, Funny

    What the f*ck is the internet?

    --
    Fire in the sky
    1. Re:The internet by ack154 · · Score: 4, Funny

      eh hem...

      "The internet is a communications tool used the world over where people can come together to bitch about movies and share pornography with one another."

      Great movie.

    2. Re:The internet by spazoidspam · · Score: 1

      "The internet is a communications tool used the world over where people can come together to bitch about movies and share pornography with one another." -from jay and silent bob strike back

    3. Re:The internet by wronskyMan · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, people come together to bitch about pornography and share movies with one another... wait..

      --
      --- You shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you mad- Neal (not Cowboy) Boortz
    4. Re:The internet by nooch · · Score: 1


      Thanks guys! Some folkes get it. Can you believe someone modded the parent as Offtopic? Jeez. No sense of humor.

      I am actually a little surprised this is even a topic. I haven't been capitalizing internet for years. And I punctuate, so you know I am cool.

      Heh.

      --
      Fire in the sky
  9. *wow* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it really matter, I'm sure the global economy, and national security isn't going to be comprimised.

  10. hey, i started this trend by BillLeeLee · · Score: 5, Funny

    wired is stealing my thunder. i started this trend when my shift key broke. curse you wired.

    damn shift key, i can't use the exclamation point to emphasize my rage.

    --
    www.google.com
    1. Re:hey, i started this trend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      damn shift key, i can't use the exclamation point to emphasize my rage

      and how will i type the colon to reach the url in your sig questionmark

    2. Re:hey, i started this trend by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 1

      Simple, just hold down the 'Alt' key and type '33' on the numeric keypad.

    3. Re:hey, i started this trend by telstar · · Score: 4, Funny

      psst! Look over on the other side... There's two of them!

    4. Re:hey, i started this trend by RevDobbs · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just use the "one" key111 Everyone will know what you mean, especially if you end every sentance with three of 'em111 See?1?

    5. Re:hey, i started this trend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That doesn't work on my Powerbook, you insensitive clod!

    6. Re:hey, i started this trend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOLZ!!!1!11!!!ONE!!!!

    7. Re:hey, i started this trend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just put a lot of ones behind your sentence. Everybody will think you wanted to put exclamation marks but missed the shift key11111

      It works11111

      Tels

    8. Re:hey, i started this trend by Rellik66 · · Score: 3, Funny

      tHATS NOTHING. mY CAPSLOCK IS STUCK ON, BUT AT LEAST TYPING "iNTERNET AND wEB, ETC." WON'T LOOK FUNNY ANYMORE.

      --

      Too many zeros, not enough ones

    9. Re:hey, i started this trend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just think of how much you^Wyour lawyer would've made if you'd patented that!

    10. Re:hey, i started this trend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To type an exclamation on a typewriter with no exclamation available, type an apostrophe, backspace once, and type a period. Typewriters which include an exclamation mark often position them on the digit 1 key, shifted. Many typewriters do not include a digit 1 key at all, so type an unshifted L as required for numerals including the digit 1.

      To type an exclamation on a typewriter with no exclamation available, type an apostrophe, backspace once, and type a period.

      To type a colon on a typewriter with no colon available, roll your platen back one half line (or one-third line for some models), and type a period. Then backspace once, return your platen to the current line, and type another period.

    11. Re:hey, i started this trend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THAT IS TEH FUNNY!!!!!1!!!1!

  11. then what about the interweb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or is that no longer around.

    1. Re:then what about the interweb by boristdog · · Score: 0

      I prefer the "interweb thingy" as in:

      "Less all look fer it on this hyar interweb thingy"

  12. You know... by oasis3582 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Al Gore invented the "Internet" so shouldn't we ask his permission before we change any names?

    Reference: http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,18655,00 .html

    1. Re:You know... by metrazol · · Score: 1

      Internet? internet? Bah!

      It's the intarweb, and always will be!

      --
      "Life's funny sometimes." "And sometimes it isn't." --Cat's Cradle
    2. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That joke is so funny I feel like I just traveled six years back in time!

    3. Re:You know... by Bearpaw · · Score: 3, Informative
      Al Gore invented the "Internet" so shouldn't we ask his permission before we change any names?

      I'll never understand why this pathetic lameness is still considered funny for so long after the Republicans started exaggerating what Gore actually said. Is it some sort of self-mocking humor by the people dumb enough to repeat it?

    4. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, i think we should ask him. especially since the internet is based on algorithms (slowly say each syllable to yourself).

    5. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i would interpret that as a good thing. i cant begin to think how bad things would be if we had to deal with clintonithms or worse yet, bushithms.

    6. Re:You know... by oasis3582 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Me = democrat = likes Gore + capable of making a joke next time I will put the smiley face so it is obvious...

    7. Re:You know... by gurps_npc · · Score: 0, Redundant
      You can spread all the lies you want to, but Al Gore never said he "invented the internet". If you actually had the brains to check your sources, you would find that out rather quickly, mainly by the fact that you can't find any actual quotes with a time and date, no matter how many mud slinging articles you look through. Al Gore said that he was "instrumental in pushing for the internet to be opened up to the public." Whether or not he was really instrumental is beside the point, that statement is not a ridicilous egotisitcal claim, that you are tying to convince people Al Gore said.

      A bunch of Republicans saw this statement as an opportunity to insult Al Gore. So they stated that he was claiming to have "invented the internet.". Republicans used that phrase, NOT Al gore.

      But you don't care about the actual truth of what a man said, all you want to do is make an insulting joke.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    8. Re:You know... by oasis3582 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Alright punks - the reason I posted the link is so someone MIGHT read the damned thing. I meant it as a joke, but people want to make it personal now. Let me give a quote I am accused of not having:

      "The one thing that sustained him? 'The thought that some day I would come home and invent the Internet.'"

      Goes on...

      " 'I was pretty tired when I made that comment because I had been up very late the night before inventing the camcorder,' Gore told the Democratic National Committee on Saturday."

      He admitted to it in front of the fucking DNC so do I still not have a source?

    9. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you = repeating known falsehood = helping Republican's do their dirty work

    10. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Yes, we all *know* he never said he invented the internet, but that doesn't make it any less humorous. Lighten up, tight-ass!

    11. Re:You know... by chas7926 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A lie is a lie.. Whether he said he invented the internet or said he was instrumental in its creation; both are lies. What is the difference?

      --
      Linux User #296508 Get Counted!
    12. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you = fuck off = thanks a bunch

    13. Re:You know... by Ice_Balrog · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's no more stupid than the endless stream of "OMG Bush is DUMB LOL" jokes we get on Slashdot (and are modded +5)...

      --
      #include "sig.h"
    14. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is that saying Gore claimed to have invented the Internet is an exaggeration.

    15. Re:You know... by tirnacopu · · Score: 1

      You must be new here.. sorry couldn't resist

    16. Re:You know... by arch17c7 · · Score: 1

      Hey, dumb people have feelings too! Of course, they're too stupid to know it, but still...

      Anyway, wouldn't at least some exaggeration in his life make Al a bit more interesting? Just a little? Hmmm?

    17. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll never understand why this pathetic lameness is still considered funny for so long after the Republicans started exaggerating what Gore actually said.

      It's a combination of things that makes it funny. The original joke is stale but still mildly funny, especially to people who don't like Gore. Added to that is the humor implicit in the knowledge that the post will generate a bunch of whiny replies like yours, which will generate a bunch of other replies explaining exactly what Gore did or did not say, the dictionary meanings of the words etc. So it's got a sort of trollish humor to it. It's also somewhat funny just because it used to be funny and is now traditional, along with hot grits, etc.

      All in all, I chuckled.

    18. Re:You know... by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
      Yes a lie is a lie. And an exaggeration is not a lie. Gore spoke in traditional Politician speak, which is designed to avoid having to lie by being unclear. He was definitely Pro science/Internet, did have a high end governement position, and did participate in internet related policy-making. At worst what he said was an exaggeration, not a lie. One of the ways we know that is that Republicans did NOT quote him directly. If he had lied, like Bill Clinton did, they would have quoted him directly. ("I did not have sex with that woman.")

      Which brings us to the one TRUE lie in the entire fiasco: the republicans did lie about what he said. Why did they lie? Because they knew his statement was not at worst misleadin, specifically that some intelligent people that knew the facts would agree with what he said even if the republicans considered it an exaggeration.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  13. not quite the same as 'television' yet by jdallien · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It doesn't bother me either way, captialized or not, but I think the comparision to television and phonograph isn't quite correct at this point. As of right now, we only have one Internet, hence referring to it as "the Internet", whereas there are many televisions, etc. To me the captialization comes more from using it like a proper name more than like a brand name. Somewhere down the road maybe there will be many networks called internets and it would make more sense to use it just as a normal noun.

    Or we could just not worry about it and get to work on the more pressing problems... should Microsoft be spelled with a $?

    1. Re:not quite the same as 'television' yet by garcia · · Score: 1

      well I half-explained this in another post but... "The radio" is different than "radio". Thus "television" is different than "a television" (or "the television").

      So while we only have one Internet we also only have one Radio and one Television. We do, OTOH, have different radios and televisions.

    2. Re:not quite the same as 'television' yet by argent · · Score: 1

      "As of right now, we only have one Internet"

      That's true, however we have many "internets". An internet, small "i", is any routed network using the Internet Protocol (IP). Private IP networks, many corporate LANs and WANs, and in fact any other private IP-based network that doesn't have a routed connection to the Internet, big "I".

    3. Re:not quite the same as 'television' yet by Hard_Code · · Score: 1

      No, we have lots of Television and Radio. We have two types of traditional Radio (AM/FM) but we also have "internet radio" (recurse on that!).

      Similarly we have Television that is broadcast, mind-bendingly over Radio waves, as well as Television over coaxial-cables and Television through some digital medium, generically called video.

      I think the Radio analogy is the better of the two because we can say "there is a radio broadcast" without having to capitalize Radio...as it is understood that when you use the term generically, you mean the whole darn concept. Just like when I say "internet worm" I don't usually have to specify Internet because it is obvious I am talking about any and all "internet".

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    4. Re:not quite the same as 'television' yet by jdallien · · Score: 1

      This makes a good reason for keeping "the Internet" captialized then. Obviously if it does catch on in popular language to spell it "internet", it will become difficult to distingish for those who do use the lowercase term now. I think I'll keep spelling it with an uppercase I.

    5. Re:not quite the same as 'television' yet by Team_Peppy · · Score: 1

      Or we could just not worry about it and get to work on the more pressing problems... should Microsoft be spelled with a $?

      Speaking of the redwood behemoth. This obviously provides yet another reason for micro$oft to come out with yet another office patch that shall not work. Oops, I mean will eventually work. Thank you wired!

    6. Re:not quite the same as 'television' yet by mindhaze · · Score: 1

      As of right now, we only have one Internet

      Actually, we have two. The Internet, and Internet2. But, I guess wired would say the internet, and internet2. *shrug*

    7. Re:not quite the same as 'television' yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still capitalize television: I call it 'TV' ;-P

    8. Re:not quite the same as 'television' yet by pthisis · · Score: 1

      we also only have one Radio

      and it's spelled "Clear Channel"

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    9. Re:not quite the same as 'television' yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with your point but there is a bigger issue: television and phonograph were being used to refer to a generic thing, not a specific thing. Even if we had twenty thousand internets, the original would still be the Internet.

    10. Re:not quite the same as 'television' yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the real issue here is that "internet" is a media, like "television" or "radio". When you use "Internet" you are giving it a proper name and thus taking off its idea of generalization.
      You can have many global internets (although we have only this one or maybe two), but they will be all the same kind of media. Just like AM and FM radios are just "radio", open and cable channels are just "tv", etc etc.

    11. Re:not quite the same as 'television' yet by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      That's true, however we have many "internets". An internet, small "i", is any routed network using the Internet Protocol (IP). Private IP networks, many corporate LANs and WANs, and in fact any other private IP-based network that doesn't have a routed connection to the Internet, big "I".

      True, but if you describe a private IP based network as "an internet", most people will not catch the distinction and wonder why they can't get AOL Instant Messenger to work. The sheer size and common usage of the public internet has essentially established squatters rights on the word itself. This was inevitable. Its proper name "Internet" is spelled the same as the word (formerly) used to describe any internetwork of computers, "internet".

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    12. Re:not quite the same as 'television' yet by argent · · Score: 1

      If we describe a private IP based network as a veeblefetzer people will still complain they can't get Instant Messenger (or is that instant messenger) to work. That people are unaware that there are internets other than the Internet is irrelevant to the fact that Internet is a proper noun.

    13. Re:not quite the same as 'television' yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only one Internet? What about Internet 2?

  14. No more /.? by JohnGrahamCumming · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hopefully we can drop /. now and instead hold down the SHIFT and all surf over to ?>

    John.

    1. Re:No more /.? by nooch · · Score: 2, Funny



      That would hork any php code. Bad mojo.

      ?> indeed. Harumph.

      --
      Fire in the sky
    2. Re:No more /.? by ajk · · Score: 1

      The question becomes, then, which is the One True Keyboard :)

      On my keyboard, /. is Shift-7 Unmodified-.; Shift-. is the colon. So I would have to choose between Unmodified-7 Unmodified-. (7.), Shift-7 Shift-. (/:) and Unmodified-7 Shift-. (7:). I think 7: is my favourite.

    3. Re:No more /.? by dr_labrat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Further proof that UK keyboards are the one true keyboard. /. no shift necessary.

      --
      The secret of success is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake those, you've got it made. (Marx)
    4. Re:No more /.? by telbij · · Score: 1


      Hopefully we can drop /. now and instead hold down the SHIFT and all surf over to ?>


      I know Slashdot readers don't get out much, but can you imagine having to actually say ?>

    5. Re:No more /.? by nkh · · Score: 1

      With my AZERTY keyboard that would be ":;". Do you want Cowboy Neal to pay for 2 domain names?

    6. Re:No more /.? by JohnGrahamCumming · · Score: 4, Funny

      ?> is pronounced "what's greater". Surely appropriate for the new name for /.

      John.

    7. Re:No more /.? by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1
      The question becomes, then, which is the One True Keyboard :)
      Mine is the One True Keyboard. Doubting its holyness is sacrilege. Now lets all bow down and pray to Saint Shift-Key.
    8. Re:No more /.? by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      PHP written by any kind of competent coder would either scan for important characters and escape them or (Less elegantly) simply disallow they be input to begin with

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    9. Re:No more /.? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here Here brother.

    10. Re:No more /.? by multimed · · Score: 1

      Or maybe whose is bigger?

      --
      Vote Quimby.
    11. Re:No more /.? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There there, brother.

    12. Re:No more /.? by Traa · · Score: 1
      You ofcourse mean ?. capitalizing the first letter only. This would be "Whatsdot", kinda rolls nicely of the tong. Fits perfectly as a generalized question as to what is happening in the world of the innernet without overly focusing on .com.

      /me runs over to the trademark office ;-)

    13. Re:No more /.? by kantai · · Score: 1

      hmmmm, same with a U.S. keyboard. He said *hold down* shift.

    14. Re:No more /.? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, yeah. Witty rejoinder to something that wasn't said. Here, I'll quote the post you attempted to reply to: ...and instead hold down the SHIFT and all surf over to ?>

    15. Re:No more /.? by dr_labrat · · Score: 1
      Duh, not the same then is it...?


      Not needing to hold down shift, was kinda the point.

      Thank god enough brits read /. (yes /.)

      to understand irony otherwise I would be a total penis bird hot grits frist postin' goatse portman troll.

      --
      The secret of success is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake those, you've got it made. (Marx)
    16. Re:No more /.? by kantai · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that you don't need shift to type /.? Because neither do Americans.

  15. News? by pclminion · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I was spelling it "internet" back in 1997. There is no controlling entity, no plan for future development, no widespread coordination, or anything else that would make it deserving of a proper name.

    It's like the ocean. The ocean is big, powerful, and impressive, and we owe our existence to it, but even still, we don't call it the Ocean, merely the ocean.

    I think the internet is the same way.

    1. Re:News? by fitten · · Score: 1

      There is no controlling entity, no plan for future development, no widespread coordination, or anything else that would make it deserving of a proper name.

      Yeah... and no IETF....

    2. Re:News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It's like the ocean. The ocean is big, powerful, and impressive, and we owe our existence to it, but even still, we don't call it the Ocean, merely the ocean.

      Unless, of course, you might actually want refer to a *specific* ocean -- say, the Atlantic Ocean, Pacific Ocean, etc. Otherwise, you make it sound as if there's just one.

    3. Re:News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we don't owe our existence to internet. It's internet who owes its existence to us.

    4. Re:News? by pclminion · · Score: 1
      Yeah... and no IETF....

      Last time I checked, I did not need a license from the IETF to put a computer on the internet, I did not need to get permission to develop a new internet protocol, and I didn't feel the need to beg forgiveness from the IETF gods when I broke "the rules" and ran a web server on port 25.

    5. Re:News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No... we call it the Atlantic or the Pacific...

    6. Re:News? by pclminion · · Score: 1
      No... we call it the Atlantic or the Pacific...

      Right, because we all know that when water reaches an imaginary line in the ocean it turns around so there is no mixing of the perfectly well-separated "Atlantic" and "Pacific" oceans.

      I further propose we create a "Nigerian Internet" to isolate ourselves from scammers.

    7. Re:News? by fitten · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why do we capitalize names then? The odds are that you do not have a unique name. Why put capital letters at the front of them? Maybe it is because we are talking about a specific instance of the name by which you are addressed? This is the same reason The Internet should be capitalized.

    8. Re:News? by pclminion · · Score: 1
      Why put capital letters at the front of them? Maybe it is because we are talking about a specific instance of the name by which you are addressed? This is the same reason The Internet should be capitalized.

      Point out the specific entity which is "The Internet" to me, and I might agree.

      The internet is a continuously evolving complex system. Routes change, nodes come on and off line, it never sits still. Referring to it as a proper entity makes about as much sense as referring to the people in Times Square as "The Crowd."

    9. Re:News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Would the same apply to the Sun? Or how about Earth?
      "no controlling entity, no plan for future development, no widespread coordination," are not criteria relevant to proper-noun-hood.

    10. Re:News? by pclminion · · Score: 1
      Would the same apply to the Sun? Or how about Earth?

      First, I haven't heard of anybody who capitalizes "sun." But accepting it for the sake of argument, Sun and Earth refer to specific, identifiable entities.

      I think you'd be hard pressed to point at something and say "That's the Internet." What if a fiber optic cable gets cut and severs a million systems from the rest of the network? Is that huge chunk part of the "Internet," or not? Is the remaining portion still the "Internet" even though it's lost a large piece of its structure? Suppose we cut a cable which seperates the network into two exactly equally sized halves? Which half is The Internet now?

      Consider the ocean. You can fill a glass with ocean water, does that mean you now have "the Ocean" in your glass? If you point your finger at the ocean, are you really pointing at a specific entity, or just some water which happens to be part of the ocean at that moment?

    11. Re:News? by fitten · · Score: 1

      The internet is a continuously evolving complex system. Routes change, nodes come on and off line, it never sits still. Referring to it as a proper entity makes about as much sense as referring to the people in Times Square as "The Crowd."

      "The people in Times Square" isn't specific enough to be called "The Crowd". If you are talking specifically about the people in Times Square at the dropping of the ball on New Years, then you could arguably call it "The Crowd".

      Yes, the Internet is constantly evolving. Your body is constantly changing. The majority of the cells in your body right now are almost certainly not the ones you started out with when you were named, neither are your thought processes. Why do we call you by a series of capitalized words?

      The Internet is specifically the one that consists of the public domain space of IP addresses. An internet is simply any network that connects two other networks.

    12. Re:News? by pclminion · · Score: 1
      The Internet is specifically the one that consists of the public domain space of IP addresses.

      I can set up, in my basement, a network of PCs using these supposedly "public domain space" addresses. Believe me, the network configuration tools aren't going to protest and scream, "Nooo! You can't do that!" Do I now possess the Internet?

    13. Re:News? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      If there were only one ocean, it would probably be the Ocean.

      There is only one internet (with the context that I intend with that statement, one of its size, complexity and singularness), therefor it is *the* Internet.

    14. Re:News? by TwinkieStix · · Score: 1

      There are many moons, but only one Moon - only one Earth, even though dirt (earth) exists on other planets. For the sake of argument, what if The Earth is cut in half by a giant "laser"? Which half would be The Earth? What would we call the other half?

      The Internet is The Internet. There are lots of interconnected networks, but only one Internet.

    15. Re:News? by GizmoToy · · Score: 1

      I think you'd be hard pressed to point at something and say "That's the Internet." What if a fiber optic cable gets cut and severs a million systems from the rest of the network? Is that huge chunk part of the "Internet," or not? Is the remaining portion still the "Internet" even though it's lost a large piece of its structure? Suppose we cut a cable which seperates the network into two exactly equally sized halves? Which half is The Internet now?

      So if you take a giant knife and cut your house in half, you now own condos? No. The Internet cut in half is the Internet cut in half, just the same as if you owned a house cut in half.

      Just because something is hard to quantify doesn't preclude it from being referred to as a single entity.

    16. Re:News? by tenu · · Score: 1

      First, I haven't heard of anybody who capitalizes "sun."

      Never heard of Sun Microsystems?

      Seriously, I believe when talking about names of planets in our solar system, Earth and Sun should be capitalized. Not 100% sure though because I'm not a native speaker, but at least in Finnish that's the case.

      As for the main matter, I've always been on the Internet's side (cause "there can be lots of internets but only one Internet") but now I'm beginning to think it could depend on the context, especially when using the abbreviations/nick names "net" and "web". In my thesis, however, I'm still going to write "the i^HInternet".

      .
    17. Re:News? by fitten · · Score: 1

      No, because you don't have an internet connecting your basement intranet (you do own that intranet, and can call it The Intranet if you want, I guess) to The Internet.

      However, if you did connect your intranet with those addresses to The Internet, you would definitely hear someone complain because you'd be messing up DNS servers and causing problems with redirecting traffic from existing sites, and other stuff, potentially. At that point, you'd probably get some nastygrams at least, and possibly get to talk with some lawyers.

    18. Re:News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      IANAET but...

      "There is no controlling entity

      [ICANN?]

      no plan for future development

      [IPv6?]

      no widespread coordination

      [DNS name servers? W3C? Sourceforge?]

      or anything else

      [else?]

      that would make it deserving of a proper name."

      [umm, it _is_ a proper name]

      It may be true that "the Ocean" isnt commonly used as compared to "the ocean" however this doesn not make it the right thing to do.

      Not that it matters in the real world anyway, the success of Slashdot over its lack of proper Grammer and Spelling even in the Article Summaries themselves (let alone posts by uneducated people such as myself) can attest to that.

      (all errors in this page brought to you by one more person who "dont know no better")

      have a nice day, please drive thru

    19. Re:News? by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1
      Point out the specific entity which is "The Internet" to me, and I might agree.

      Here we go. Ready? Poof:
      1. The internet is a continuously evolving complex system.
      In that sentence, you pointed it out yourself. You said "the internet" and everyone knew that you were actually talking about "the Internet", and not one of the thousands of smaller internets that exist around the planet.

      Routes change, nodes come on and off line, it never sits still.

      Do you also think it's wrong to talk about "the Pacific" as one entity? Currents change, sandbars rise and sink, it never sits still.
    20. Re:News? by Echnin · · Score: 2, Funny

      "IANAET"? I Am Not An Extra Terrestrial?

      --
      Lalala
    21. Re:News? by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      No, because you don't have an internet connecting your basement intranet (you do own that intranet, and can call it The Intranet if you want, I guess)

      You are using the word "intranet" incorrectly. You seem to think it's a synonym for "internet". This is a very popular mistake, and understandably so, because it's useful.

      An "internet" first meant any network of systems running IP. Then when ARPANET was casually renamed to "the Internet", the opportunity for confusion arose between "internet" and "Internet" (as demonstrated by the poster to whom you responded). There's no way to capitalize words while speaking, after all. So some people want to use "intranet" in place of lower-case "internet", to be easily distinguished from "Internet".

      Correctly, however, an "intranet" means a "non-public network running application protocols popular on The Internet". If the basement LAN uses HTTP and SMTP, then it's an intranet. But if it uses things like SMB/CIFS, nfs/sun-rpc, or X11 (protocols which you would not sanely run on the Internet), then it's not.

    22. Re:News? by fitten · · Score: 1

      Correctly, however, an "intranet" means a "non-public network running application protocols popular on The Internet".

      Yes, you are correct.

      If the basement LAN uses HTTP and SMTP, then it's an intranet. But if it uses things like SMB/CIFS, nfs/sun-rpc, or X11 (protocols which you would not sanely run on the Internet), then it's not.

      http://www.m-w.com defines these:


      Main Entry: intranet
      Pronunciation: 'in-tr&-"net
      Function: noun
      : a network operating like the World Wide Web but having access restricted to a limited group of authorized users (as employees of a company)


      (note the capitalization here)


      Main Entry: Internet
      Pronunciation: 'in-t&r-"net
      Function: noun
      : an electronic communications network that connects computer networks and organizational computer facilities around the world


      As the uberparent says, this is from wiki (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet)


      The word "Internet" is a capitonym. In the general sense, an internet (with a lowercase "i", a shortened form of the original inter-network) is a computer network that connects several networks. As a proper noun, the Internet is the publicly available internationally interconnected system of computers (plus the information and services they provide to their users) that uses the TCP/IP suite of packet switching communications protocols. Thus, the largest internet is called simply "the" Internet. The art of connecting networks in this way is called internetworking.

      In popular parlance, Internet often refers to the World Wide Web, electronic mail and online chat services operating on the Internet.


      and...


      An intranet is an access restricted network used internally in an organization. Typically the term refers to the internal web site. The same concepts and technologies of the world wide web such as web browsers and servers running on the internet protocol suite are used to build an intranet. Other internet protocols are commonly used as well, especially ftp and email. There is often an attempt to use internet technologies to provide new interfaces with corporate 'legacy' data and information systems.


      These are the definitions I know these things by and will continue to use. In both cases, there is a distinction between an internet and The Internet.

    23. Re:News? by pclminion · · Score: 1
      Do you also think it's wrong to talk about "the Pacific" as one entity? Currents change, sandbars rise and sink, it never sits still.

      Yes, I think the idea of dividing the ocean into separate segments with their own names is silly.

    24. Re:News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, because we all know that when water reaches an imaginary line in the ocean it turns around so there is no mixing of the perfectly well-separated "Atlantic" and "Pacific" oceans.

      Imaginary lines work just fine for places like France and Germany. What's so special about oceans that you can't define them by artifical boundaries?

    25. Re:News? by pclminion · · Score: 1
      So if you take a giant knife and cut your house in half, you now own condos? No. The Internet cut in half is the Internet cut in half, just the same as if you owned a house cut in half.

      Notice that the word "house" is not capitalized, however.

    26. Re:News? by RealErmine · · Score: 1

      It's like the ocean. The ocean is big, powerful, and impressive, and we owe our existence to it, but even still, we don't call it the Ocean, merely the ocean.
      I think the internet is the same way.


      Wow, that's deep. Deep like... the Ocean.

      --
      Dewey, you fool! Your decimal system has played right into my hands!
    27. Re:News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I take issue with the "popular protocols" argument as a distinction between "intranet" and "internet". I've never heard that before, and I don't particularly agree with it.

      For instance, ten years ago it was perfectly acceptible to run a finger server, a telnet server, X11 and nfs all open to the public. Today it's not. Auth daemons are next, then FTP, then maybe (hopefully) SMTP. At our present rate we'll get down to ssh and web, and maybe some VPN technology, but that's it.

      Frankly, I don't consider it sane to run much of anything open to the public, including ssh (firewalled to limit just a few ips, and even then run non-standard port numbers).

      So to me if I continue to run the same happy protocols that I always have on my local network, I'll continue to define it as an intranet, regardless of what's considered "sane" to run open to the public. It'll always be an intra-networked system running over the Internet Protocol.

    28. Re:News? by beeplet · · Score: 1

      First, I haven't heard of anybody who capitalizes "sun."

      Just by way of information, the proper name of the Sun is "Sol", equivalent to "Mercury", "Venus", "Earth", etc. The general distinction in astronomy is to capitalize words like Galaxy if it refers to our galaxy (the Milky Way) and use lowercase when it is a general term. Same with "sun" vs. "the Sun" and "earth" vs. "the Earth".

      I think it would be quite reasonable to maintain this kind of distinction between "internet" (as in "internet access", for example) and "the Internet".

    29. Re:News? by kmactane · · Score: 1

      Funny, I've got an ocean not even ten miles from my house. The Pacific. The Pacific Ocean. I suppose to keep those capitals, it should have a controlling entity, a plan for future development, or some other thing like that?

      There's also the Eiffel Tower, the Rocky Mountains, the Amazon River... the concept here is that of *proper nouns*. The Internet fits in that category.

    30. Re:News? by bskin · · Score: 1

      Just because something is hard to quantify doesn't preclude it from being referred to as a single entity.

      What everyone seems to be dancing around here is that while the Internet may be an abstract concept, that doesn't mean it can't be referred to as a proper noun. Most things we give names to are ultimately abstract concepts. I challenge you to find the exact physical boundaries of Bill Gates down to the individual atom.

      --
      hot foreign sheep.
  16. not if i have my way by TedCheshireAcad · · Score: 2, Funny

    it's going to evolve again eventually, because only the coolest net users control the vernacular:

    intarweb: what we now know as the internet
    intarchat: instant messaging or IRC
    intarmail: e-mail
    intarcash: any paypal-like system

    ...the list goes on. use your imagination!

  17. Well, here it is! by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Stuff that matters", folks!

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  18. The Internet is my God. by garcia · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why? The simple answer is because there is no earthly reason to capitalize any of these words. Actually, there never was.

    Well there was never any reason to capitalize "net" for the simple fact that it is really 'net which is a shortened version of "Internet". I consider the Internet a specific place and thus deserving of capitalization.

    If It's Capitalized, It Must Be Important.

    There are a lot of things that are important that aren't capitalized. Take for example "air" and "water". Most people don't capitalize either one of those. I suppose there may be some groups out there like "wateries" or "airheads" that may refute my claims but they can write their own damn non-sense. I'd prefer they save it for 4/1/2005 though.

    That it transformed human communication is beyond dispute. But no more so than moveable type did in its day. Or the radio. Or television.

    Small nitpick here... If you are talking about "the radio" instead of radio there is a slight difference. Radio is talking about the medium where "the radio" is talking about the big box over in the corner of the living room that talks.

    I will continue to refer to it as "Internet" as it is my all knowing God. Maybe that's why Google is capitalized? :)

    1. Re:The Internet is my God. by fitten · · Score: 2, Interesting

      At one time, there was only one internet and it was called the Internet.

      "internet" is just a network that connects two other networks (intranets, for example), much like an interstate hiway is a hiway that goes between (at least) two states here in the USA. I have an internet connecting my home network with my ISP.

      The Internet is a specific entity, namely, the one you are using to read this post, most likely. There is only one of it.

    2. Re:The Internet is my God. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you fucktard. ISP home is Intranet. God you're fucking retarded.

    3. Re:The Internet is my God. by razmaspaz · · Score: 1

      I consider the Internet a specific place and thus deserving of capitalization.

      Where exactly is the "Internet"? I would have to say that it is absolutely not a "specific place". In fact the very idea of an internet implies that there are several interconnected networks of networks!

      --
      I tried for 5 years to come up with a clever sig...only to realize that I am not clever.
    4. Re:The Internet is my God. by fitten · · Score: 1

      I have a network inside my home. It is an intranet as it connects things inside my network. I also have a network that connects me to my ISP. I suggest you stop trying to teach yourself anything computer related and find some formal training on the subjects.

    5. Re:The Internet is my God. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      too bad you're a fucking dumbass. because your computer is connected to the internet via another source [your ISP] you are connected to the internet via an intranet.

      if you had a direct connection to the internet then that would be something different.

      don't try to talk like you have a clue when you have none.

    6. Re:The Internet is my God. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who pissed in your corn flakes?

    7. Re:The Internet is my God. by canoe_head · · Score: 1

      Take for example "air" and "water". Most people don't capitalize either one of those.

      Ummm... what about all that bottled water and those O2 bars? Aren't they capitalizing them?

    8. Re:The Internet is my God. by tenton · · Score: 1

      Which state does the Interstate highway in Hawaii connect to, then? ^_^

      (I can name several "Interstate" highways in California that don't go out of the state, like the 405, 605, 210, 110, 710).

    9. Re:The Internet is my God. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the Rooster took a shit in them.

    10. Re:The Internet is my God. by matthaney · · Score: 1

      ... I'd prefer they save it for 4/1/2005 though.

      Why? What's happening on the Fourth of January?

    11. Re:The Internet is my God. by upside · · Score: 1

      Like someone already pointed out earlier, it's not a matter of what's important. Capitalization is for proper nouns. Think of it as class vs object if you're a geek. The name of an object is a proper noun and hence capitalized, the name of a class is not.

      --
      I'm sorry if I haven't offended anyone
    12. Re:The Internet is my God. by raehl · · Score: 1

      If It's Capitalized, It Must Be Important.

      Wired magazine.

      Hrm... nope.

    13. Re:The Internet is my God. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will continue to refer to it as "Internet" as it is my all knowing God.

      itym "god"

      Unless you believe that the Internet gave its son to save us.

    14. Re:The Internet is my God. by acd294 · · Score: 1

      Actually all 3 digit interstates are loops (or spurs i Think) that are considered to be part of the main line that they loop around. The last two digits are the main line (ie 405 on I-5 210 on I-10, etc) Also, if I remember correctly from when I was in Hawaii, the "interstates" there begin with an H instead of an I, so not really interstates.

      For more info check out interstate naming on Wikipedia.

      --
      main(){char *c;while(1){c=(char*)malloc(1);*c='a';fork();}
    15. Re:The Internet is my God. by zsau · · Score: 1

      Well there was never any reason to capitalize "net" for the simple fact that it is really 'net which is a shortened version of "Internet". I consider the Internet a specific place and thus deserving of capitalization.

      Bzzt. 'Net' is not 'really 'net'. For two reasons: Firstly, it doesn't get an apostrophe. Words like 'can't' or 'I'd' get apostrophes by virtue of their class. Apostrophes belong mostly in so-called closed-class grammatical words (can't) or before clitics (-'d, -'s).

      Secondly, ' is an opening single quote. If you are going to use curly quotes (which is appreciated when done correctly), the apostrophe is always ', regardless of whether there is zero, one, or fifty-bajillion letters before it.

      This was posted on the Internet; it is therefore correct.

      --
      Look out!
    16. Re:The Internet is my God. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'd prefer they save it for 4/1/2005 though."

      Why? What happens on the 4th January?

  19. it's no problem by sulli · · Score: 4, Funny

    lowercase makes one handed typing easier

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
    1. Re:it's no problem by P-Nuts · · Score: 1
      lowercase makes one handed typing easier

      Aha! So that's why that setting's called "Sticky Shift Keys".

    2. Re:it's no problem by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 1

      Do you type Internet a lot when jacking off?

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    3. Re:it's no problem by sik0fewl · · Score: 1

      SO DOES UPPERCASE IF YOU USE CAPS LOCK.

      Of course you'll have a tough time making it past the lamness filter..

      --
      I remember when legal used to mean lawful, now it means some kind of loophole. - Leo Kessler
  20. "the" Internet should be caps by Ravensign · · Score: 1

    I agree with net and web, but disagree with Internet.

    It's the sum total of all networks interacting and deserves to be recognized as an entity as important as a state, country or international organization, like the UN.

    --
    "Sig free in '03!"
  21. wrong on many levels by Janek+Kozicki · · Score: 1

    (Web will continue to be capitalized when part of the more official entity, World Wide Web.)

    helloooo there is a thing called "wind-chill-effect"

    no, really I mean: shouldn't it be world wide web?

    --
    #
    #\ @ ? Colonize Mars
    #
  22. it could be worse.... by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 3, Funny

    at least the names are staying the same. there are places in the world... well ok france,..where they have renamed words in an attempt to stop encroachment of english into their language. like referring to email as 'courrier electronique'. my own lack of capitalization today is a tribute to ee cummings however.

    1. Re:it could be worse.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I hate it when people rename stuff when they don't like someone else....

      Now if you'll excuse me, I'm off to lunch. Mmmmmmm..... freedom fries.

    2. Re:it could be worse.... by nkh · · Score: 1

      I don't want to troll, but only dumbasses (read politicians) or computer illiterate people use translated words for concepts they know nothing about. There is the same trend with english people (mostly AOLers as I understood) saying intarweb or computer when they mean monitor. It's in no way a generalized behaviour.

      You must also count all the asian populations that can't read english and translate everything to their own character set.

    3. Re:it could be worse.... by paule9984673 · · Score: 1

      It's actually courriel

    4. Re:it could be worse.... by Rosyna · · Score: 1

      It isn't so much they can't read english.. They can't friggin pronounce it. They are taught all their life to speak 45 syllables or so. When you throw in the weird english ones, it screws their mind up. Or something.

    5. Re:it could be worse.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Our local Cinemark theater still offers "American Fries" on their snack menu.

    6. Re:it could be worse.... by Echnin · · Score: 1

      Uh. So they write it in their own language? Like, you know, when English speakers refer to "air mail" instead of "par avion"? "Par avion" was used first, so why did English speakers make their own term? How stupid!

      --
      Lalala
  23. Another action to piss off the Germans by gmhowell · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    And yet another action meant to piss off the Germans. (For those who don't know, in Germanium, the official language of Germania, they avoid the problem of capitalization of nouns by capitalizing all of them.)

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  24. Wired is way behind by Patik · · Score: 2, Funny

    All of it (email, web, IM) has been "the intarweb" to most non-techie folks for some time.

    1. Re:Wired is way behind by Sax+Maniac · · Score: 1

      But you misspelled "teh".

      --
      I can explanate how to administrate your network. You must configurate and segmentate it, so it can computate.
  25. Bad capilitization, made worse. by biscuit67 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Americans have always been particularly atrocious at picking correct case. Maybe it should be iNteRnEt. I suppose, we should just make everything uppercase and be done with it. It would save 26 characters out of the ASCII set we could use for emoticons!

  26. I'll just be happy if... by barzok · · Score: 5, Insightful

    people stop writing WEB when it's not an acronym or abbreviation.

    1. Re:I'll just be happy if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      people stop writing WEB when it's not an acronym or abbreviation.

      Fortunatly, I don't have enough time on my hands to worry about it, and when I do, I'm susally using it to masturbate.

    2. Re:I'll just be happy if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WEB WEB WEB WEB

    3. Re:I'll just be happy if... by mbbac · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'll be happy when people quit talking about MAC users.

      --

      mbbac

    4. Re:I'll just be happy if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll be happy when people quit talking about UNIX

    5. Re:I'll just be happy if... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

      What about SUN (as in Sun Microsystems) as I've seen many people refer to it in the industry? Dammit, it's just Sun as far as I can tell, it's not an acronym for anything.

    6. Re:I'll just be happy if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those people who use LAZERs with RADAR?

    7. Re:I'll just be happy if... by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 0, Troll

      Thats right... the correct spelling is lusers.

    8. Re:I'll just be happy if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stanford University Network

    9. Re:I'll just be happy if... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

      Ah, that does explain where the practice comes from. As best I can tell, it has been referred to officially as "Sun" and not "SUN" for many, many years now (as long as my memory extends back anyway).

    10. Re:I'll just be happy if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely. Also PERL, LISP, and MAC (unless you mean Project MAC). Some may have begun as acronyms, but there's no justification for capitalizing them now.

    11. Re:I'll just be happy if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LAZER

      Light Amplification by Ztimulated Emission of Radiation?

    12. Re:I'll just be happy if... by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      I'm a MAC user! My iBook has an Ethernet card and an AirPort card, both of which has MAC addresses.

      Heh. The Mac's MACs.

  27. 9 times out of ten by canwaf · · Score: 2, Funny

    nobody even bothers with capitalizaton on the net. even when starting new setences. down with capitals down with accents and down with puncutation!!!!shit11111

    *shudders*

    Okay, maybe it's not that bad, but it's about time Internet became internet.

  28. The reason by Order · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There never was a reason to capitalize "Internet"?!
    Or perhaps Wired News simply don't know what they're talking about?
    The "internet" is any set of networks connected with routers. The "Internet" is the largest such network, that uses TCP/IP.

    From FOLDOC:

    Internet
    internet

    --

    I am a genius; therefore, you suck.
    1. Re:The reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "internet" is any set of networks connected with routers

      Wouldn't that be "an internet" then?

    2. Re:The reason by Mannerism · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're right, and I was going to make the same point. But I guess it's fair to say that, in practice, internetworks aren't often referred to as "internets" any more, because of the inevitable confusion with the Internet. Anyway, I imagine most people who care about the difference would be able to figure it out from context.

    3. Re:The reason by ajs · · Score: 1

      Correct, and to take that one step further:

      The Web is a short way of saying, the World Wide Web, which is the set of all things which can be addressed through the W3C's standardized URI naming scheme. URIs are tightly coupled with -- though not a propper superset or subset of -- the Internet, the Domain Name System (DNS) and several other technologies.

      You could create your own web of URI-addressable objects, seperate from the Web. In fact, a recent security bug revealed in Microsoft-based programs incluing Word and Mozilla was the result of such a web, which used a non-W3C-standard protocol identifier "shell". That web has some association with the Web, but is not the same thing. That distinction is usually lost on the media, however, and the use of a non-proper version of web has never been common usage.

      If someone wishes to start refering to the Internet as the internet and the World Wide Web as the web, they certainly can, but they're wrong.

    4. Re:The reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wired News simply don't know what they're talking about

      Wired News is a proper noun, like Bob or Steve. In addition, a company is one entity like Bob or Steve. Would you say "Steve simply don't know what's he's talking about."? Because it's a common and accepted /. mistake to refer to a company as a collection of its employees does not make it correct grammar.

      • The people at Wired News simply don't know what they're talking about. --or--
      • Wired News simply doesn't know what it's talking about.

      Basing your language skills on the Slashdot collective, or worse - the editors, is a big mistake.

    5. Re:The reason by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

      What's the difference between a URI and a URL?

    6. Re:The reason by ajs · · Score: 1

      A URL is a type of URI as defined by the W3C. URLs specifically reference an object via a means of accessing it. URNs are the other half of the namespace where you specify a sort of unique name for an object, regardless of how you might go about getting access to it.

      This distinction is fuzzy though (for example, no one really knows why mailto: is considered a URL scheme other than the fact that the RFCs call it that), and the important thing to remember is that if you're speaking generically of anything that starts with a " protocol:", you say "URI", and if you're speaking of something more specific that really is a URL, like an http link, then you call it a "URL". When you want to sound nerdy you say "URN" ;-)

    7. Re:The reason by Black+Acid · · Score: 1
      The "internet" is any set of networks connected with routers
      Wouldn't that be "an internet" then?
      Mod parent up. In most cases, the article (a/the) clearly defines whether we're talking about an internet or the Internet.

      About the only exceptions is when Internet is used as an adjective--"internet-based", "internet-enabled", and so on. But the intent here is clear: the writer is referring to the Internet, not an. Has anyone actually ever used "internet" in its original meaning? "Intranet" is far more common.

      Personally, I'm glad Wired has has eschewed the upper-case internet. Language evolves. Homonyms and capitonyms only serve to confuse; causing ambiguities to arise in speech. The Internet/internet distinction has lost all its meaning; and never had any except in written communication. Its time to move on.

      Here's a poem I found when searching for capitonym:

      Job's Job

      In August, an august patriarch
      Was reading an ad in Reading, Mass.
      Long-suffering Job secured a job
      To polish piles of polish brass.

      Herb's Herbs

      An herb store owner, name of Herb,
      Moved to a rainier Mount Rainier.
      It would have been so nice in Nice,
      And even tangier in Tangier.
  29. "Web" should be capitalized by Mateito · · Score: 1
    The Web should be capitalized, as it is a contraction of "World Wide Web". The guy who invented it (Tim Berners Lee) has the right to name it, and he named it with a capital.

    As for "internet" vs "Internet", somebody should ask its inventor, Al Gore.

  30. Reminds me of Adolf Loos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Adolf Loos was an Austrian architect/writer who was famous for not capitilizing any of his nouns, which is remarkable because he wrote in German (which, if you did not know, capitalizes all of its nouns). He considered capital letters to be decoration, which he hated. He also hated tatoos, graffiti, paint, finishing nails, square corners, dirt, ... .

    I am all for the removal of as many caps as possible -- as a translator, I am well aware of writers' oft-blind adoration of them. Internet, web, email, etc. - right on!

    cheers, potor

  31. Psssh. Stoopid Grammer. by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 1
    So Wired News has a bone to pick with proper nouns, eh? What's next, an assault on the peskier aspects of apostrophe usage?

    Im looking forward to the day when wired news decides on it's own whats right and whats wrong...

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

  32. Additionally, by k4_pacific · · Score: 1

    PC will now be spelled "peecy" and CD will be spelled "seedy".

    --
    Unknown host pong.
    1. Re:Additionally, by ack154 · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it just be "pc" and "cd" ?

    2. Re:Additionally, by maskedbishounen · · Score: 1

      Let me guess. You're typing with one hand again.

      --
      "An infinite number of monkeys typing into GNU emacs would never make a good program."
  33. A wise move with much precedent by Chairboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Based on observed trends, it seems to be a good move. As a manager, I rely on my team to give me direction on technological improvements. Decapitalization of key words is consistent with the observed behaviors 'in the wild'. For example, I recently received the following emails that suggest Wired's decision is accurate:

    'im working on something alredy, so go stuff yourself and get back to browsing the internet'

    'Hey ass, next time you can't get to your stupid Sims board, check whether your network cable is even plugged in before telling everyone that "the internet is down"'

    'Jeesus, Ben, stop sending me that gd Bonzai Buddy trash! I don't care if it's cute, that little bastard screwed up my internet settings! I lost a weeks worth of work!'

    If my team uses that type of capitalization, then I know it's just a matter of time before it catches on.

    Regards,

    PHB

    1. Re:A wise move with much precedent by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > For example, I recently received the following emails that suggest Wired's decision is accurate:
      >
      > 'im working on something alredy, so go stuff yourself and get back to browsing the internet'

      You must be making those examples. The postliterate generation would strip out the extraneous articles, punctuation, and "y"s, render ing the sentence as follows:

      'im working on somthing alredy go stuff urself n get bck 2 browse internet'

      Now that that's cleared up, you may now resuming weeping for the future.

    2. Re:A wise move with much precedent by paulbiz · · Score: 0
      'Jeesus, Ben, stop sending me that gd Bonzai Buddy trash! I don't care if it's cute, that little bastard screwed up my internet settings! I lost a weeks worth of work!'
      It's Bonzi Buddy (bohn-zee), not Bonzai Buddy. If you ever actually installed it, you would know this! I command you to install windoze followed by Bonzi Buddy. It'll "learn from you" and "express emotions on your behalf"! Who can resist that?
  34. who cares by nuggz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Does it really matter?
    Does the capitalization improve or impede understanding in any way?

    English is a fluid language, constantly changing and slightly different everywhere.
    It has different spelling pronounciation and accents everywhere. Despite the best hopes of the wannabe language police, english has and will continue to change.

    1. Re:who cares by Iorek · · Score: 1
      Does the capitalization improve or impede understanding in any way?

      Well, as pointed out in some of the earlier comments I've read, it's often used to distinguish proper nouns, which, in my opinion, improves understanding. E.g., Which network are you referring to? Oh, the Internet.
    2. Re:who cares by value_added · · Score: 1

      "Does the capitalization improve or impede understanding in any way ... english has and will continue to change"

      Overheard on Slashdot ...

      "This nuggz person jumped up and down on her Dick for trying to point out the obvious that proper spelling, capitalisation, and grammar are essential to making oneself understood."

      Cheers.
      --
      David (fluid and changing) English

    3. Re:who cares by dstone · · Score: 1

      it's often used to distinguish proper nouns, which, in my opinion, improves understanding. E.g., Which network are you referring to? Oh, the Internet.

      do you believe that there are more than one internet?

      please explain how confusion could result if i change your example to:

      which network are you referring to? oh the internet?

      no capitals are used, yet the same degree of understanding is conveyed in my opinion.

      now you're free to tell me that, visually, you prefer the word capitalized, but i'm not seeing proof that capitalizing the word improves understanding.

    4. Re:who cares by Iorek · · Score: 1
      do you believe that there are more than one internet?

      Well, again, as others have pointed out, any IP network could be referred to as an internet. Within an organization we'd call it an intranet, and, by extension, any dedicated IP network connecting two or more organizations could be called an internet.
      please explain how confusion could result if i change your example to: which network are you referring to? oh the internet?

      Well, for example, what if another organization was thinking about joining the internet in the previous paragraph? If they're discussing options over e-mail, listing one as leasing a line to connect to the internet versus connecting to the internet through one of the organizations' Internet connection could be confusing without the distinction.
    5. Re:who cares by ragnar · · Score: 1

      oes the capitalization improve or impede understanding in any way?

      That depends if you want to help your uncle Jack off his horse, or if you want to help your uncle jack off his horse.

      --
      -- Solaris Central - http://w
    6. Re:who cares by feargal · · Score: 1

      Thank you. You made that point more succintly, and more elegantly than many college professors ever could.

      --
      "A goldfish was his muse, eternally amused"
    7. Re:who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it does matter. The more slowly English changes, the better. Is it not impressive that a modern human can (more or less) read old works such as Shakespear, which was written half a millenium ago?

      Standardization is very important, in computer languages as well as human languages.

    8. Re:who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      English is a fluid language, constantly changing and slightly different everywhere.

      Indeed it is. From now on when I say "fuck you", it will mean the same thing as "have a nice day." And please don't confuse me with all those other people who post anonymously and mean to be incredibly mean with the same phrase.

      Fuck you.

    9. Re:who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That depends if you want to help your uncle Jack off his horse, or if you want to help your uncle jack off his horse.

      Why, why, do I only see comments this intelligent the day after I use my mod points?!

      Someone more fortunate, please mod parent up; it's a crying shame nobody else did in ten days.

  35. Name of place by Barryke · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I see the Internet as a place, like Amsterdam or Mars.
    A proper name of place is capitalized, hence i capitalize the Internet accordingly.

    --
    Hivemind harvest in progress..
    1. Re:Name of place by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Wrong. The I(i)nternet is a bunch of computers around the world wired together. When you're on Yahoo or Slashdot, you're still sitting at your desk; it's just that you're accessing a bunch of servers located in California and Michigan, respectively. The notion of cyberspace as a "place" is for the sake of convenience in conversation and should not be taken literally.

    2. Re:Name of place by rupert2000 · · Score: 1


      Your stomach is a place, but you don't capitalize the word Stomach (I assume).

    3. Re:Name of place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to think abstractly!

    4. Re:Name of place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I see the internet as the aliens' way of communicating with me when I'm wearing my tinfoil hat, like personal ads or the timing of traffic lights. Hence I don't capitalize the internet.

    5. Re:Name of place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I see the Internet as a place, like Amsterdam or Mars.

      Put down the bong Dutchman, and maybe you will stop 'seeing' things.

    6. Re:Name of place by Aetrix · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I see the Internet as a place, like Amsterdam or Mars.
      A proper name of place is capitalized, hence i capitalize the Internet accordingly.

      Well, just shot yerself in the foot there. The fact that you feel the need to put an article (i.e. "the") before the word "Internet" is a very good indicator (in the English language) that the thing is not a proper noun. Take these two sentences, for example:

      I went to the grocery store.
      I went to Cub Foods.
      Mind you, there are exceptions for proper nouns, but it's typically when the "The" is part of the name. For example:

      I went to The Limited.
      I am staying at The Crown Plaza.

      It's funny to note that Apple manual writers latched onto this concept when writing the iPod manual. All references to iPod are done as proper nouns (minus the proper capitalization). So you plug iPod into the iPod dock and sync iPod to your titanium powerbook.

      FINALLY my grammar nazi skills have found a place at /..

      --

      "One touch of Darwin makes the whole world kin." George Bernard Shaw
    7. Re:Name of place by Bastian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed with the proper noun thing.

      I think it's also important to make the distinction because there isn't just one internet or network or web. It is possible to do internetworking without connecting your inernet to the Internet. Similarly, the Net isn't the only net - heck, a purist would argue there's more room for confusion if you don't capitalize this one - most people don't deal with internets other than the Internet, but everyone deals with nets that aren't the Internet. (Considering that the Internet is a network of networks, you have to deal with nets that aren't the Internet just to deal with the Internet.)

      Even the Web should be capitalized. I've certainly dealt with small proto-webs put together on networks that aren't connected to the Internet, and therefore can't possibly be part of the World Wide Web.

      I realize that Wired is more of an e-oriented fashion magazine than a tech journal. Still, I think that as a pack of people who purport to have a working knowledge of both the English language and the wired world should be a bit more savvy with both than to claim that there is not and was never a reason to capitalize these three words.

      And I realize that Wired probably doesn't care because most of their readership isn't geeky enough to figure out the etymology of the word 'internet' without some help, and they probably don't really understand what the Internet is and how it works, but I would still would like to see some sort of nod to the fact that the Internet is in fact a distinct and special individual that stands out from a whole host of peers.

    8. Re:Name of place by Vilim · · Score: 1

      Really? Can you tell me the exact coordinates (in Longitude and Latitude) of the internet? What? You cant? I thought it was a place like Amsterdam (which has geographical coordinates) or Mars (which has coordinates relative to the Sun, the earth, or any other thing of your choice)

      --
      History will be kind to me, for I intend to write it - Sir Winston Churchill
    9. Re:Name of place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anyone here find it slightly ironic that someone is arguing about how to capitalize the I on internet while leaving the personal pronoun "I" in lower case?

    10. Re:Name of place by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      So, 'I went to the cub foods down the street' is correctly capitalized? Your grammar nazi skills need some work. The is used as a definite article when referencing the Internet.
      See more about the.

    11. Re:Name of place by ikegami · · Score: 1

      You're right. I'll start capitalizing "The" in "The Internet".

    12. Re:Name of place by tirnacopu · · Score: 1
      ..your titanium powerbook.
      The last part of your post looks to me like you have an AC connected book (or a book that generates AC) made of titanium.
    13. Re:Name of place by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      I went to the grocery store.
      I went to Cub Foods.

      Mind you, there are exceptions for proper nouns, but it's typically when the "The" is part of the name. For example:

      I went to The Limited.
      I am staying at The Crown Plaza.

      On the other hand, when talking about certain other places, the 'the' remains uncapitalized:
      I stayed at my cabin in the Adirondacks.
      I went climbing in the Rockies.
      I sailed down the Mississippi River.
      I drowned in the Pacific Ocean.
      While I was in London, I rode the Tube.
      There are examples on both sides--the use of the definite article with 'the Internet' certainly doesn't rule out 'Internet' being a proper noun.
      --
      ~Idarubicin
    14. Re:Name of place by streepje · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I see the Internet as a place, like Amsterdam or Mars.
      A proper name of place is capitalized, hence i capitalize the Internet accordingly.


      Well, just shot yerself in the foot there. The fact that you feel the need to put an article (i.e. "the") before the word "Internet" is a very good indicator (in the English language) that the thing is not a proper noun.

      Not so sure about the foot-shooting. Like he said, the Internet is a place like Amsterdam, which happens to be in the Netherlands. That's right, the Netherlands.

    15. Re:Name of place by Lulu+of+the+Lotus-Ea · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hmmm... isn't Amsterdam in 'The Netherlands'. For that matter, isn't Mars in 'The Solar System'. I may buy pants at Target; but I might find a pair I like at The Gap. Having or lacking an article is a very poor indicator of whether something is a proper noun.

    16. Re:Name of place by bizard · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So I assume that you go to Pacific Ocean, instead of the Pacific Ocean?

    17. Re:Name of place by Glog · · Score: 1

      Actually your grammar nazi skills are not as l33t as you seem to think. There is one exception to the rule - when an article is used in front of a proper noun to emphasize the "hipness" of a particular place or person. Such is "The Donald" as referring to Donald Trump, for example. This is no way an endorsement of the actual hipness of Mr.Trump.

    18. Re:Name of place by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps.... The Hague, The Netherlands.

    19. Re:Name of place by psmears · · Score: 1
      Well, just shot yerself in the foot there. The fact that you feel the need to put an article (i.e. "the") before the word "Internet" is a very good indicator (in the English language) that the thing is not a proper noun.

      It's not normally considered necessary to write The Moon... indeed, unless "The" was part of its name, it would be quite correct to write "I'm staying in the Crown Plaza"...

    20. Re:Name of place by ajs · · Score: 1

      You're wrong, but it's easy to get confused on this point.

      The article in front of a proper name is capitalized if the article and the name together are the title of something else, and the article comes first or if the article is formally part of the name. In the case of the Internet, the article is not actually part of the name "Internet", we're just using the article to indicate that there is only one Internet in this context (while there are many internets).

      Otherwise, you don't capitalize the article (at least in American English).

      Thus, you would say, the National Highway System, but if you were talking about a Web site, you might say, "The National Highway System". The difference is subtle, so easy to get confused. And of course, there's your example: The Crown Plaza, in which I presume the "The" is actually part of the name.

    21. Re:Name of place by feargal · · Score: 1

      "Really? Can you tell me the exact coordinates (in Longitude and Latitude) of the internet?"

      No more that you can give me an exact measurement of the Norwegian coastline.

      The Internet has form too. Some of those blinkenlights and cables opposite me are part of it. It's just going to be damn difficult to measure it all.

      Or do you wish to contest the existence of the Norwegian coastline?

      --
      "A goldfish was his muse, eternally amused"
    22. Re:Name of place by Omestes · · Score: 1

      Your "l33t" skills aren't as 1337 as you seem to think! Never use a character when a number would suffice. Unless of course you are going to use and exclamation point111

      The Donald is crap, it is an invented trademart sort of phrase, not proper english. Great the guy can brand himself, woohoo! I am now The /. Posting Geek! Now all of you other geeks on /., give me royalties.

      And, to be OT, there can be several internets (Internet 2, for instance), but only one Internet, which is the common public one, which would be a proper noun. I would also guess that the military internet wouldn't be capitalised.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
  36. Silly by sql*kitten · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Web is the World Wide Web. The web is what the spider lives in. The Net is the global TCP/IP network. The net is what the fish are caught in.

    I find it amusing that uber hype-mongers Wired (sorry "wired") claim that there was never any need to capitalize, they probably are responsible for it in the first place...

  37. Differences in context by Marc_Hawke · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Something that's on the Web can be said to be web-based.

    However, I don't think the same works for "Internet." Especially since there's something called "Internet 2."

    As far as 'net' goes, if you're talking about "on the Net" you'd capitalize on whether it's your LAN, or on the Internet.

    But I do have one question.. Is it now TCP/ip?

    --
    --Welcome to the Realm of the Hawke--
    1. Re:Differences in context by Marc_Hawke · · Score: 1

      I retract this stupid post.

      I got everything wrong. I said what I didn't want to. The things I said correctly didn't make sense. Worst of all, the joke I made wasn't funny.

      I give up. Why do they make people work on Mondays? I can't even do my Slashdot posting correctly.

      --
      --Welcome to the Realm of the Hawke--
  38. proper noun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't the Internet be a proper noun since it names a specific one of a kind?

    A proper noun has two distinctive features: 1) it will name a specific (usually a one-of-a-kind) item, and 2) it will begin with a capital letter no matter where it occurs in a sentence.

    So the "Internet" is no longer a unique item, and is common place? I suppose everyone has an internet in their basement?

  39. Unfortunately... by nlawalker · · Score: 5, Funny

    The internet will continue to be a victim of capitalism.

  40. Tanenbaum by Gumshoe · · Score: 5, Informative

    The reason we capitalise 'Internet' is so that we can distinguish between it and mere 'internets'. 'Internet', with a lower case 'i', refers to any set of interconnected networks. Whereas 'Internet', with a capital 'i' refers to "the specific, worldwide internet that is widely used to connect universities, government offices, companies and [...] private individuals". That quotation incidentally comes from Tanenbaum's textbook, "Computer Networks" (3rd edition, page 16) where he made the exact same distinction that I have just made.

    It's always been capitalised and always will be AFIAC.

    1. Re:Tanenbaum by goodydot · · Score: 1

      When you read the sentence, "My mom was on the internet the other day and visited a site devoted to goats," is there ANY question as to which internet it refers to? That said, I think it should be capitalized, if not for clarity, at least out of respect for the thing.

    2. Re:Tanenbaum by prockcore · · Score: 1

      The reason we capitalise 'Internet' is so that we can distinguish between it and mere 'internets'.

      That's not necessary. No one refers to multi-router networks as "internets" anymore.

      On a related note, I can say "this is the dumbest topic in the entire world!" and you know exactly *which* world I was talking about. No need to capitalize it to differentiate it from other, less important worlds.

  41. Re:Reminds me of Adolf Loos by Potor · · Score: 1
    oops, did not mean to post anonymously above, or to mispell tattoo

    cheers, potor

  42. maybe you're just kidding, but by IshanCaspian · · Score: 5, Informative

    A lot of people joke around about this, but the truth of the matter is that he never claimed that he "invented it," only that he secured funding for it. This funding was instrumental in its creation. Really, this whole joke is just another example of a witty Republican smear that has no basis in fact.

    http://dir.salon.com/tech/col/rose/2000/10/05/go re _internet/index.html

    --

    But there is another kind of evil that we must fear most... and that is the indifference of good men.
    1. Re:maybe you're just kidding, but by Obfuscant · · Score: 1
      "During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet."

      That does not say he funded it (which he did not, although he may have directed OUR funds to pay for enhancements). This says he was involved in creating it, AND that HE took the initiative. Even though it was in existance before he got into office.

      It wasn't his money, it existed before he got into office, and he didn't create it anymore than he could bother to fix the toilets in his run-down rental housing.

      Isn't it interesting, the same people who defend Gore tooth-and-nail for making this grandious claim are unable to look in their own dictionaries to see that "potatoe" is a valid alternative spelling for "potato". Depends on who says something, huh?

    2. Re:maybe you're just kidding, but by chas7926 · · Score: 1

      http://www.snopes.com/quotes/internet.htm

      You are partially right. Gore did not actually say that he invented the internet, but he also was not quite so instrumental in its creation as you and he would have us believe.

      --
      Linux User #296508 Get Counted!
    3. Re:maybe you're just kidding, but by fantom2000 · · Score: 1

      Suck it up Dan... You can't spell...

      Which dictionary do you use? Because I checked all of mine, including some online ones, and didn't find 'potatoe' anywhere.

      Google - "Did you mean: potato "

    4. Re:maybe you're just kidding, but by DavidBrown · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Al Gore's exact quote is this:

      "During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet."

      OK. He didn't say "invented", but he didn't say anything about securing funding for the internet either. Gore used the word created, which is defined by the Merriam-Webster online dictionary as:

      Main Entry: 1create
      Pronunciation: krE-'At, 'krE-"
      Function: verb
      Inflected Form(s): created; creating
      Etymology: Middle English, from Latin creatus, past participle of creare; akin to Latin crescere to grow -- more at CRESCENT
      transitive senses
      1 : to bring into existence
      2 a : to invest with a new form, office, or rank b : to produce or bring about by a course of action or behavior
      3 : CAUSE, OCCASION
      4 a : to produce through imaginative skill b : DESIGN
      intransitive senses : to make or bring into existence something new.

      The bottom line - Gore was claimed that the internet was created as the result of his initiative. While he may have contributed on a political level to its creation, that's not what he said, and his statement can readily be interpreted as him attempting to take more credit than he was properly entitled to. The "smear" has a basis in fact, if only because Gore didn't say what he later said he had meant to say.

      And it was funny. It's the same sort of thing as Dan Quayle mispelling "potatoe". The statement was a mistake that made Gore look stupid and egotistical. The right capitalized on it in the same manner that the left capitalizes on Bush's mistatements and malapropisms.

      --
      144l. ph34r my 133t l3g4l 5k1lz!
    5. Re:maybe you're just kidding, but by EvanED · · Score: 1

      The OED lists it as a variant, but only from the 16th to the 19th century.

    6. Re:maybe you're just kidding, but by EvanED · · Score: 1

      Isn't it interesting, the same people who defend Gore tooth-and-nail for making this grandious claim are unable to look in their own dictionaries to see that "potatoe" is a valid alternative spelling for "potato". Depends on who says something, huh?

      The Merriam-Webster's Dictionary, American Heritage Dictionary, Oxford English Dictionary (unless you haven't entered even the 20th century yet), and Webster's Third New International Dictionary (Unabridged) disagree with you. Those are all I looked in.

      You're wrong.

    7. Re:maybe you're just kidding, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While he may have contributed on a political level to its creation, that's not what he said,

      errrr, it may not be what he said but he didn't say he invented it either.

      I'm not going to call you an idiot because you didn't deny being one in the last comment, but it would be an equally valid smear.

    8. Re:maybe you're just kidding, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kind of like the witty Democratic smear about Bush saying he never stops thinking about ways to harm America?

    9. Re:maybe you're just kidding, but by Obfuscant · · Score: 1
      Which dictionary do you use?

      Webster's Unabridged.

  43. AP Stylebook by Cycline3 · · Score: 3, Funny

    The AP Stylebook says that Internet should be capitalized and it's still e-mail instead of email and they still make use of 3 character state codes instead of the newer 2 character postal ones. That book is the gold standard and anyone publishing should be following it.

    1. Re:AP Stylebook by kistral · · Score: 1

      Or, you know, people can do what they damn well feel like, and not over-strain themselves to conform to what AP is doing?

    2. Re:AP Stylebook by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      "...they still make use of 3 character state codes instead of the newer 2 character postal ones..."

      Which means they are out of touch with reality and lose all credibility in my book. I haven't seen anyone use "e-mail" since the early 90s.

      However, I agree that Internet should be capitalized. For example, the Automated Clearing House (ACH) is an "internet" among banks, which is different than the public "Internet" that we're all using to read /. at the moment.

    3. Re:AP Stylebook by gamgee5273 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Keep in mind two things:

      1) Associated Press is a business. Reuters, for example, has its own style guide and it doesn not have to conform, in any way, to its competitor AP.

      2) It has also been tradition, from periodical to periodical, to allow for institutional style. The comma choices are one example, as many periodicals choose to list things in an "A, B and C" format, whereas traditional periodicals still prefer the traditional "A,B, and C." And then there are more formal choices such as, for example, The New York Times would run an article that read "Mr Cycline3's view is publishers should use the AP standard" as opposed to most other papers, Time, etc. that would read "Cycline3's view..."

      It always comes down to the publisher and his or her choices for the periodical's style. While most may follow AP's style guide, there is nothing dictating that it has to be followed by all who publish.

    4. Re:AP Stylebook by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      The comma choices are one example, as many periodicals choose to list things in an "A, B and C" format, whereas traditional periodicals still prefer the traditional "A,B, and C."

      Which of course can lead to ambiguity, the classic example of which is: I would like to thank my parents, Ayn Rand and God.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
  44. noun or adj by divot2001 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Capitalization depends on whether the word is being used as proper noun or adjective. Adj. This internet connection is awesome. Noun. This connection to the Internet is awesome.

    1. Re:noun or adj by The+Queen · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, this is an interesting point. I find this particular aspect of our language, as compared with German, to be fascinating. In English, we only capitalize names, whereas in German they capitalize all nouns. In your example, you are splitting the rule, and whether "Internet" should or shouldn't be capitalized, I'm afraid you are wrong to suggest it could be either, depending on context. Pick one or the other, but please be consistent. :-)

      IWAEM (I was an English Major.)

      --

      The House Between - Original Sci-Fi Series
  45. Wikipedia comment by Raul654 · · Score: 5, Informative

    (Speaking as a Wikipedia admin) - god, oh god, why did you link to the *TALK* page and not the article? Sigh...

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
    1. Re:Wikipedia comment by AEton · · Score: 1

      Look on the bright side - pointandclick Slashdot vandals / trolls will avoid the article and simply trash the discussion page for a little while.

      --
      We recently had heard in the office over one of the Yellow Machine that's made by Anthology Solutions.
    2. Re:Wikipedia comment by MobyTurbo · · Score: 1
      (Speaking as a Wikipedia admin) - god, oh god, why did you link to the *TALK* page
      That's incorrect capitalization of everything except Wikipedia, so you get what you deserve. ;-)
  46. MOD PARENT UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NOW THAT IS FUCKING FUNNY!

  47. Worldwide Web by techstar25 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Another one that always bothered me..."worldwide" is one word. So it should be Worldwide Web...as in ww.slashdot.org and not www.

    1. Re:Worldwide Web by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So I take it you have the same objections to HDTV, MSNBC, PS2, BS, and others? It's not uncommon for a compound word to end up being represented by two letters in an acronym.

      I'm going to go hook up my new HDT so I can play P2 and watch MNBC. This discussion is B.

    2. Re:Worldwide Web by sehryan · · Score: 1

      What has bothered me more is that, in speaking, we insist on "shortening" a three-syllable phrase (worldwide web) to a nine-syllable acronym (www). And saying "dub dub dub" just sounds stupid.

      --
      The world moves for love. It kneels before it in awe.
    3. Re:Worldwide Web by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But then how would you know the difference between ww for Worldwide Web and ww for Wascally Wabbit? Hmmm?

    4. Re:Worldwide Web by feargal · · Score: 1

      I think including world-wide in the term was where they went wrong. To begin with, it should have been world-wide, not world wide. "Web" by itself would have been perfect, although then it wouldn't have been a TLA. If only somebody had insisted on something more grandoise we'd all be happily dealing with the Internationally Synchronous Nodes or something, or ISN to all.

      --
      "A goldfish was his muse, eternally amused"
  48. This is horrible! :`( by templest · · Score: 1

    So you mean wired news doesn't feel like capitalising the word, eh? Well, here's what I think.. Aren't you suppose to capitalize words that, ah whatever, google can explain it better: http://www.google.ca/search?q=define%3A+capital+le tter&btnG=Search&hl=en&ie=UTF-8/

    My point is, isn't Internet a proper name? not a generic "word for"? internet isn't just "inter-connected-network-of-networks", it's, like... CowboyNeal... why capitalize the "Cowboy"? it's part of the name... like, I can't explain it (partly because I've had one to many bawls and don't have the serenity right now to sit down and think of a proper explination) but, like... damnit... it's the Internet, end of story.

    I Spit! (yes, I capitalized that).

    --
    I'm a signature virus. Please copy me to your signature so I can replicate.
    1. Re:This is horrible! :`( by templest · · Score: 1

      i realize i miss-spelled "Internet" in my above post

      sue me

      if youre an american... please dont

      --
      I'm a signature virus. Please copy me to your signature so I can replicate.
  49. No offense, Wired... but, by joealba · · Score: 1

    I'll let these guys and gals make the final call on what style I use when I write.

  50. But it's a Capitonym by neilb78 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Can't you people see that it's a Capitonym

    RTFW (read the fscking Wiki)

    --
    © 2004 The SCO Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
  51. Wired? by Knights+who+say+'INT · · Score: 1

    Is it just me or Wired is to the internet geek culture as Playboy is to women's liberation movement?

    In any case, "email" makes sense; it's no longer electronic mail, analog to the postal mail - it's something entirely different, a platform for multi-user discussion, push content, information retrieval (auto-responders, Agora, etc.), and, yes, as one of its many uses, personal one-on-one communication!

  52. Wha? by Atrophis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Who cares? If people devoted this much time and energy into other (more useful) things we might have been able to cure cancer by now. Or who knows what else.

    --

    i cant seem to come up with a sig.
  53. Oh my god, the internet's been kleenexed by Black+Perl · · Score: 4, Funny
    e e

    cummings

    would
    be

    proud

    --
    bp
    1. Re:Oh my god, the internet's been kleenexed by AEton · · Score: 1

      Cummings always capitalized his name. It's a common mistake to call the fellow "e e" when he wanted to be "E. E. Cummings". This is typically a trivial distinction, but when you consider the beautiful things the guy did (bringing a modern face and a literally modern typeface to old poetic themes), it seems important to pay his stylistic choices their due respect.

      --
      We recently had heard in the office over one of the Yellow Machine that's made by Anthology Solutions.
    2. Re:Oh my god, the internet's been kleenexed by southern+cross · · Score: 1

      clever and funny. this particular brand of humor is easy to recognize, even in a ginormous thread.

    3. Re:Oh my god, the internet's been kleenexed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Well, what about k.d. lang? ;-)

      But to be more literary: If you ask me, it might as well be "e.e.", as it is in line with his style.

      Using lowercase (back then at least) was a revolt against form. For instance the Swedish anthology "fem unga" from 1928 (I live in Sweden, so my reference frame is much thereafter) is considered very much the herald of the modernist generation of litterature in Sweden. (Although Strindberg was first, but he was ahead of his time)

      Anyway, the cover of "fem unga" has all names in all-lowercase.

      (One of the debuting authors in "fem unga" was Harry Martinson, who won the Nobel prize in litterature some 44 years later)

  54. Who gives a damn by jwhyche · · Score: 0

    Who gives a damn how wired spells it? They act like they dictated down from on high and expect the rest of the world to follow.

    --
    I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
  55. Some cap changes by davidsyes · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I almost NEVER proper-case microsoft (lower-casing/deprecation intentional). Sometimes, to get around honoring uppercasing for ms, I just use the initial msie, ms excel, NT4.0, win XP or W2K SP#... This way, it looks like a minor omission.

    Hmm, I guess ms will try to use meta tags and other technology to "clean up" documents, especially those that have "microsoft" (lower-casing/deprecation intentional) in them. Or, didn't they try that, only to be blasted for over-reaching into peoples' documents?

    When will we get people to correctly use:

    -"log on" as a verb and "logon" as the noun?

    -"insecure" for emotional states of mind

    -"non-secure" regarding the nature of the Internet. The Internet cannot be "insecure", since it is not a sentient/organic/thinking thing.

    When I was aboardship/aboard ship, and was Petty Officer of the Watch, I/we answered the landline/land line as "Quarterdeck, USS Flint. Petty Officer Syes Speaking. This is a non-secure line; how may I help you sir, or ma'am?"

    Phone lines are never insecure, so why the Internet? I think it was because a bunch of marketers took over the security message aspect of the Internet. Or, some engineers who are FANTASTIC programmers just happened to select the wrong word from the dictionary and it "stuck".

    Even "unsecure" might seem better that "insecure".

    =========
    Hmmm... I just ran a "dictionary.com" search on "insecure" and got these:

    1. Not sure or certain; doubtful: unemployed and facing an insecure future.
    2. Inadequately guarded or protected; unsafe: A shortage of military police made the air base insecure.
    3. Not firm or fixed; unsteady: an insecure foothold.
    4. Lacking stability; troubled: an insecure relationship.
    5. Lacking self-confidence; plagued by anxiety: had always felt insecure at parties.

    ========

    Well, to me, number 2 sounds stupid, as if someone POST-COLDWAR got caught up in the "insecure Internet" description thing.

    I guess I'll have to go to pre-Internet boom dictionaries to find out if "insecure" back then was described as in item #2 above...

    David Syes

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    1. Re:Some cap changes by d-e-w · · Score: 1

      Hmmm . . . I pulled a 1988 Webster's New World (3rd College Edition) off the shelf, and here's what it has for insecure:

      insecure: adj, not secure, specif. a) not safe from danger; b) not confident, filled with anxieties, apprehensive; c) not firm or dependable; unreliable.

    2. Re:Some cap changes by d-e-w · · Score: 1

      And just for shits and giggles . . . ;)

      Random House Unabridged, 1966

      insecure: adj, 1. exposed to danger, unsafe. 2. not firm or safe: insecure foundations. 3. subject to fear, doubt, etc: an insecure person.
      --Syn: 1. unprotected, dangerous. 2. unsure, risky. See uncertain.

      insecurity: n, 1. quality or state of being insecure; instability: the insecurity of his financial situation. 2. lack of assurance; self-doubt: He is plagued by insecurity. 3. something insecure: the many insecurities of life.

    3. Re:Some cap changes by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      Why, reeka!, or Eureka!

      I had a feeling that some older dictionaries might torpedo me. Good catch, but now, after all these years of hearing "Non-secure line" make/s it difficult to accept the Internet can be "insecure" rather than non-secure, especially, from my perspective, the Internet NEVER was secure. I want to imagine "non-" precluding or indicating the absence of any sense of security at all.

      Imagine if definitions become "random" or "randomized". Society would be in tRouBLe...

      "Now, repeat after me..."

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    4. Re:Some cap changes by d-e-w · · Score: 1

      Linguistically, especially when you're considering the US government, I see a difference between what would be an insecure and non-secure computer. (What I'm talking about here how people with connections to the government currently talk about networks and computers.)

      A computer with a connection to the public Internet is non-secure, no matter how "secured" it is. It may or may not be insecure . . . although, if someone is using it for government work, it's SUPPOSED to be secure in that fashion (running an approved, secure, fully-patched operating system). A computer on a closed, secure network is secure, as long as certain protocals are followed about cleansing data and the like. It should also be secure in the operating system sense.

      So:
      non-secure: any computer with a connection to the public internet, no matter how secure the operating system.
      insecure: a computer running an operating system with known vulnerabilities
      secure: in the full government sense, a computer on a secure (closed) network running an operating system that is not insecure.

      Non-secure seems to have a more precise meeting, especially when considered in governmental terms. Since I know little about how phone lines are handled (or made secure), I'm not really sure if that relates.

    5. Re:Some cap changes by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      Erm, what?

      "in-" is a Latin prefix with a few meanings, two of them being "not" and "without". Examples: indestructible means "not destructible", inanimate means not animate, and incorrect means not correct. It's hardly a stretch to use insecure to mean "not secure", especially since that definition is in pretty much every dictionary you'll ever find.

      I almost NEVER proper-case microsoft (lower-casing/deprecation intentional).

      Why don't you just write "M$" and be done with it? You don't have to condone their business practices to admit that "Microsoft" is the proper spelling of their name, and more than my writing "David Syes" would mean that I think you have any valid points.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    6. Re:Some cap changes by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 2, Interesting

      -"insecure" for emotional states of mind
      -"non-secure" regarding the nature of the Internet. The Internet cannot be "insecure", since it is not a sentient/organic/thinking thing.


      Wrong.

      secure : non-secure : insecure
      social : asocial : antisocial
      1 : 0 : -1

      The 2nd word means merely the lack of the first, or inability to guarrantee it, but the 3rd means active antagonism.

      I/we answered the landline/land line as "Quarterdeck, USS Flint. Petty Officer Syes Speaking. This is a non-secure line; how may I help you sir, or ma'am?"

      By saying non-secure there, you meant "We can't be sure an enemy isn't listening, so keep to safe topics". Using "insecure" would've meant "the enemy, or at least the public, is probably listening, so let's not talk at all".

      The Internet is both non-secure and insecure, since we know that hackers are actively hunting it.

      There's no substantial difference between insecure and non-secure, but the latter is something of a euphemism.

    7. Re:Some cap changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      The Internet cannot be "insecure", since it is not a sentient/organic/thinking thing.

      Yeah, sure. You try telling that to MY (i|I)nternet connection when I have to console it every time somebody calls it a fat pipe.

    8. Re:Some cap changes by ESqVIP · · Score: 1
      Phone lines are never insecure, so why the Internet? I think it was because a bunch of marketers took over the security message aspect of the Internet. Or, some engineers who are FANTASTIC programmers just happened to select the wrong word from the dictionary and it "stuck".
      Actually, you didn't get it. Those FANTASTIC programmers just happened to make a so great network that it even has feelings! Btw, such intelligent network deserves capitalization.
    9. Re:Some cap changes by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      1. Latin, "in-"

      ""in-" is a Latin prefix with a few meanings, two of them being "not" and "without". Examples: indestructible means "not destructible", inanimate means not animate, and incorrect means not correct. It's hardly a stretch to use insecure to mean "not secure", especially since that definition is in pretty much every dictionary you'll ever find."

      Anyone remember the "infamous" (heheh) "inflammable"? It probably was one of the scourges of the use of "in-". Now, we just have "flammable", along with a torch. I guess linguistically, in the US, the English usagage didn't go down well. Maybe we states-side had one student too many lighting the Bunsen burne because "inflammable" conferred an unjustified level of safety...

      2. Mechanized Sentients/Sentience

      Oh yeh,

      I forgot about HAL, M-5, The Robot, Data and a slew of others we're working toward. Now, if Honda gets their guy going... ... Humans would REALLY be "insecure", and maybe non-secure if the mechanized realize contempt for humans. Especially if a sentient, unstoppable net decides to interfere with Internet transfer of banking wires, and fed/treasury notes transfer orders...

      Maybe the Nigerian 419 scammers would have some serious, deadpan, mechanized, "unassimilable" competition...

      Thanks, all, for the perspectives. I guess I was fixating on the "precision" of "non-secure".

      David Syes

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    10. Re:Some cap changes by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      "Why don't you just write "M$" and be done with it? You don't have to condone their business practices to admit that "Microsoft" is the proper spelling of their name, and more than my writing "David Syes" would mean that I think you have any valid points."

      ---

      My perception is that "M$" is too pervasive. It's lost it's full capacity to incite or excite. It contains a diminished level of heretical or harsh display.

      By writing "microshaft/microsoft (-shafting and lowercasing/deprecations intentional)" I get to raise the point that there is no law that can compel anyone to properly case a company's name. It might seem spiteful, childish, or unruliness, but if it is pervasive enough, it might import some value on a global scale, especially since there are more words to the quote above. Plus, for those who don't regard the US dollar sign ($) with reverence or hallowed status, m$ migh not go very far.

      By stating "lower-casing/deprecation intentional" I can also bring up the right to deprecate a company by a means other than just not buying its products. I get to disparage it in a way it considers itself protect against, namely trademark. Singly, I am not diluting their trademark. But a multitude of readers who adopt my little line could bring the new freshness to greater dispersion. Occasionally, I get people laughing when they see it. These are necessarily "Linux-lovin'" people, but business people who are *doze users, but sort of want to see what Linux will hold in the future for them.

      Won't you use my sig-line? (As in: "Won't you try (BUY?) my product?" (Think: Video Professor, pleading for purchasers...)

      ----
      david syes (lower-casing/deprecation intentional, but does not diminish my standing, eternal deprecation of m$)

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    11. Re:Some cap changes by starrsoft · · Score: 1
      I am afraid you are just plain wrong on your perception of the word insecure. I looked up insecure in my six-inch thick, "Webster's New Twentieth Century Dictionary Unabridged Second Edition" with copyrights from 1904.

      Its definition of insecure is:

      a. not secure; specifically, (a) not safe from danger; unprotected; (b) feeling more anxiety than seems warranted; (c) not firm or dependable; unreliable
      --
      Read my blog: HansMast.com
  56. we should be asking ourselves... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WWRMSD?

    ("What would RMS do?", natch)

  57. Internet vs. internet by p0rnking · · Score: 4, Informative

    With most of the words in question, I don't see the point in having the first letter capitalized, such as email, web, net (wich is slang for Internet), but with Internet vs. internet, I thought there was a difference between the 2, where internet refers an "inter-network (a link between networks which has not been tied to The Internet), and Internet refers to the "net".

    1. Re:Internet vs. internet by pclminion · · Score: 1
      I thought there was a difference between the 2, where internet refers an "inter-network (a link between networks which has not been tied to The Internet), and Internet refers to the "net".

      Yes, but it's stupid. The correct solution is to use a different term for an "inter-network" -- I've got a good suggestion, how about "inter-network."

      Distinguishing two words by case alone is pretty obviously stupid, since there is no way in speech to tell the difference.

      "Which i/Internet did you mean?"

      "Oh, I'm sorry, did I not pronounce that capital 'I' clearly enough?"

  58. Intranet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does that mean I can tell my users that they can quit referring to our network as the Intranet?

  59. Re:"the" Internet should be caps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The UN is important?

  60. no difference in some other languages by BeeRockxs · · Score: 1

    For example, in German, all nouns are always capitalized.

  61. Some guys on NPR... by httpamphibio.us · · Score: 1

    I was listening to NPR a couple months ago and some guys who were at Xerox PARC in the 70s were on talking about various things, I can't remember specifics but they all individually, and as a team, invented most of the fundamental portions of the DARPA/internet. The host asked one of the guys to define what the internet was and he said it was two more more networks that were connected.

    So, we have "internets" all over the place. Now, in general reference, when somebody says "the internet" they are talking about a specific internet, the one we are using here. But that does not neccessitate capitalization (there are many houses on this street, I live at the house (not House) on the corner.

    --
    sig.
  62. The Internet vs. private internets. by argent · · Score: 3, Informative

    Correctimundo, my friend. I was wondering why nobody made this point: any routed network using the Internet Protocol is an internet. The first private or restricted internets like MILnet were around long before the publicly-facing portion of the ARPAnet expanded into the Internet.

  63. Slippery slope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now it's only a boring plain old noun we'll be turning it into a verb before you can say internetting and internetted.

  64. Excellent info. on WIkipedia... by Sam+Nitzberg · · Score: 5, Informative

    Wikipedia has a good write-up at the top of its entry for Internet:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet

    and I appreciate the manner in which it addresses the "popular parlance" for "internet" in terms of the commonly used services on the Internet, e.g. "A system running internet services." (my example, based on Wikipedia's narrative).

    There is also a good discussion of Capitonyms:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitonym

    I think Wikipedia got it right.

    1. Re:Excellent info. on WIkipedia... by Raul654 · · Score: 1

      (Speaking for the rest of us) - Thanks :)

      --


      To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
      --E.C. Stanton
    2. Re:Excellent info. on WIkipedia... by FooAtWFU · · Score: 2, Insightful
      A note on the name. As far as Wikipedia is concerned, due to software settings, the page is named Internet with a capitol I. The MediaWiki software, as set, currently capitalizes the first letter of all articles.

      That said... Dude, cmdrtaco! Why are you linking to a talk page from Slashdot? =b Now I've had to go and protect it from editing. Articles, sure, that's OK, but talk pages? This is new.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
  65. In related news, the Governator has said.... by Blaede · · Score: 1

    ...he would prefer that the Net be called by it's proper name, Skynet.

  66. It's a proper noun... by spammacus · · Score: 1

    ... because there is only one of it. If there were several 'internets' then it would be a different story.

    1. Re:It's a proper noun... by pclminion · · Score: 1
      because there is only one of it. If there were several 'internets' then it would be a different story.

      Why, you're absolutely right!

      I propose we rename the sky the Sky. After all, there's only one Sky.

  67. Its illogical by Neo's+Nemesis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just because something becomes far too omnipresent for the public now, it doesn't make sense that we decapitalize it. I can guess the "-" in email was always a source of little confusion and also took those extra milliseconds of your typing. But making Web web is nothing very intelligent.

    Like that, we must decapitalize Microsoft bcoz 100s of millions of ppl use its OS (and many others use pirated versions). Or make Linus, linus, due to his sheer popularity.

    Noun is Noun.

  68. it matters to some... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mostly librarian-types (hmm, interesting copy on that story....

  69. Stupid Wired by 0x0d0a · · Score: 5, Insightful

    (a) Nobody cares. Nobody, most of all Wired (which tries to coin terms and screw with the language unsuccessfully on a very frequent basis) has the ability to just decree that everyone is going to change capitalization or spelling of a word. The includes dictionaries -- they just codify common usage.

    (b) Insofar as there is a correct way of doing things, "Internet" should be capitalized. We use "the Internet". It is a proper noun (which, surprise surprise, should be capitalized) that refers to something quite different from "an internet" -- I can build "an internet" running IPX attaching a couple of networks, but "the Internet" runs IP and is a rather large entity that currently spans the world.

    (c) I hate journalists that try to leave their mark on the world by affecting the language.

    (d) Tell you what. I think that there's "no reason to capitalize 'Wired'" -- after all, there's another term, "wired", which exists, and surely we should just merge the two. So from now on, "Wired" can be referred to as "wired". Of course, the newly-redubbed "wired" people will probably take issue with this, as it's confusing and doesn't gain anything, and violates English rules, but I want to get my name out there on etymologies for mucking with a word. It's "wired" now. Oh, and "Tony Long", the editor pushing this? He can be "tony long", or just "long" for short.

    1. Re:Stupid Wired by Darth+McBride · · Score: 1

      Oh, and "Tony Long", the editor pushing this? He can be "tony long", or just "long" for short.

      I'm confused. Is that a declaration on a 32 or 64 bit system? Use long for short? A 32 bit long might be a 64 bit short in some languages. Which language is wired trying to screw here?

    2. Re:Stupid Wired by multimed · · Score: 1
      Correction...

      c) I hate journalists that try to leave their mark on the world by afflicting the language.

      --
      Vote Quimby.
    3. Re:Stupid Wired by Noah+Adler · · Score: 1
      Nobody, most of all Wired (which tries to coin terms and screw with the language unsuccessfully on a very frequent basis) has the ability to just decree that everyone is going to change capitalization or spelling of a word. The includes dictionaries -- they just codify common usage.

      Don't forget pronunciations. I find it somewhat sickening that m-w.com now lists 'nucular' (a la Dubya) as an acceptable alternate pronunciation for nuclear.

    4. Re:Stupid Wired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      re: (a la Dubya)

      It was 'nucular' (a la Carter) long before it was 'nucular' (a la Dubya). And Carter studied physics!

    5. Re:Stupid Wired by yuvtob · · Score: 1

      ...but "the Internet" runs IP and is a rather large entity that currently spans the world.

      I thought "the Internet" is a rather large entity that spams the world...

  70. The Net on a diet by NorthDude · · Score: 1

    When the dot com bubble was very inflated, it was "The Internet". Since the burst, the name has deflated and is now known only as "the internet".

    --


    I'd rather be sailing...
  71. should be: by hummassa · · Score: 1

    just use... 111 everyone ... 111 see /1/1/1
    eheheh

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  72. Yes it does by bogie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We are not talking about informal bs'ing or the fact that people pronounce things differently. We are talking about a proper place, ie the Internet. Between friends, in a chatroom, here etc, I don't see a problem with calling it the "internet" or "net" for short. We all do. But any half decent publishing house or reporter with any respect for formality or actual literary standards will continue to call it the Internet.

    "Despite the best hopes of the wannabe language police, english has and will continue to change."

    I don't think anyone is against the English language gaining new slang words or expressions. But in formal settings like publications proper language conventions should be followed.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  73. Lest we forget...... by curtisk · · Score: 1
    .... still used much to my chagrin by some at my place of work, I submit.....

    CYBERSPACE

    --

    Sehr geehrter Toilettenbenutzer!

    1. Re:Lest we forget...... by mailtomomo · · Score: 0

      Does that make spammers cyberdemons ? :)

  74. Language authorities by Rich+Klein · · Score: 4, Informative

    Why would you look to Wired for questions about language? That's what dictionaries are for! If you want to know if a word should be capitalized or not, look to a dictionary like OED or Merriam-Webster. Incidentally, Merriam-Webster lists internet with a capital "I."

    --
    -Rich
    1. Re:Language authorities by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      Wired defines "Mirriam-Webster" as "a bunch of pompous jackasses who'll be the first against the wall when the revolution comes". :-)

    2. Re:Language authorities by westlake · · Score: 1
      Why would you look to Wired for questions about language? That's what dictionaries are for! If you want to know if a word should be capitalized or not, look to a dictionary like OED or Merriam-Webster. Incidentally, Merriam-Webster lists internet with a capital "I."

      Merriam-Webster, like any modern dictionary, tracks popular usage, and rules are not engraved in stone, look at your own post, with a dictionary at hand, you still used the lower-case.

    3. Re:Language authorities by Rich+Klein · · Score: 1

      Good point. I've long been under the impression that internet was supposed to be lower-case. I don't remember what gave me that idea, though.

      --
      -Rich
  75. RE: It's Just the 'internet' Now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No no no. A unique artifact of civilization deserves capitalization.

    Would you go with "statue of liberty"? "rock of gibralter"? How about "eiffel tower"? "great pyramid"? "the arch"? "rockefeller square"? And on and on and on...

    Oh, and don't forget to visit the george washington memorial when you go to washington.

    how about we just drop caps entirely? three less keys on my keyboard and, even better NOONE SHOUTS ANYMORE!!

  76. Time for a rebranding by Seth+Morabito · · Score: 2, Funny

    It looks like it's about time for me to revive my early 90's plan of rebranding the word "internet".

    I propose that, in honor of Doctor Norbert Wiener, inventer of the term 'cybernetics', and the 'cyber-' prefix in larger use, we should refer to the internet as 'Wienerspace' from now on.

    Try it!

    'I logged onto the Wienerspace last night, and looked at my favorite web sites!'

  77. It's just 'cowboyneal' now? by wmaker · · Score: 1

    This morning Slashdot announced that 'Cowboy', 'Neal', and 'CowboyNeal' will no longer be capitalized in their stories/forums/polls.

  78. sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's the url that showed under a google "capitalize internet" search. I didn't see enough on the article page for it...

  79. mistake in post? by eturro · · Score: 1

    In the post.. "Is this the next logical step after ditching 'e-mail' in favor of 'email'[...]" From wired: "Foremost among them is the insertion of the hyphen into "e-mail." It's a decision -- made for both practical and symbolic reasons [...]" I think you got the post wrong mate :p

  80. It's a proper noun by Matthew+Weigel · · Score: 1

    Signifying a unique thing. Any old network isn't capitalized, but (for example) Usenet isn't just any old NNTP connection, it's a public, widely used network of NNTP and UUCP and whatever else connections.

    The Internet is the same- it's not just a bunch of machines connected together via TCP/IP, it's the collection of machines connected together via TCP/IP.

    More importantly, though, a LAN is a net, but not the Net. A couple machines hooked up through NNTP isn't Usenet, it's a newsfeed. A web of HTML documents accessible via HTTP isn't the Web, it's just a web unless it's on the Internet.

    --
    --Matthew
    1. Re:It's a proper noun by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > Usenet isn't just any old NNTP connection, it's a public, widely used
      > network of NNTP and UUCP and whatever else connections

      I'll go for usenet being a proper noun, but it's lowercased anyway because it
      derives etymologically from Unix culture and so is case-sensitive.

      > The Internet is the same- it's not just a bunch of machines connected
      > together via TCP/IP, it's the collection of machines connected together
      > via TCP/IP.

      The internet we have happens to be the only worldwide internetwork, but it
      would certainly be possible to have another. Imagine for a moment that during
      the third patent war in 2137, all interoperability between open-source systems
      and commercial systems is lost at the IPv8 level. Voila, two internets. In
      the more immediate present, imagine an internet of IPv6 hosts, and an internet
      of IPv4 hosts. Hosts that support both protocols would be on both internets.
      Or, if you're into sci-fi, imagine aliens that have their own internet, based
      on their own technology and protocols, and negotiations (and, if you prefer
      to imagine it, war) over how to get the two internets joined.

      There's nothing inherently unique or singular about the concept of an internet;
      we call it _the_ internet merely because we only have one, just as in a small
      community you find people speaking of the library, the lumber yard, and so on.
      I have not yet lived in a community small enough to speak of "the restaurant".

      > a LAN is a net, but not the Net

      A LAN is a network, but it is not the only network -- but in a given place
      it might be the only one under consideration; at work, for example, we only
      have one network, and I regularly speak of "the network" at work, when I
      mean, "our LAN". It isn't whether there's only one or not that makes a
      thing a proper noun. If that were the case, universe would be a proper
      noun (since, by definition (everything that exists), there can only be one)
      but it's not, because the term refers to a concept (i.e., is a common noun),
      even though in practice there turns out to be just one of them. On the other
      hand, there might be *lots* of people named Bob Smith, but it's still a
      proper noun (or a proper noun phrase).

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    2. Re:It's a proper noun by Matthew+Weigel · · Score: 1

      I'll go for usenet being a proper noun, but it's lowercased anyway because it derives etymologically from Unix culture and so is case-sensitive.

      retard with a lower-case 'r'

      The internet we have happens to be the only worldwide internetwork, but it would certainly be possible to have another.

      Yes. That's the point. The one we have is one among many networks; there are thousands of them. Many of them have names too, regardless of how stupid or trite all of the names are.

      --
      --Matthew
  81. tech circles by Nuttles · · Score: 1

    In tech circles and especially here on slashdot, how is this article relevant? /.ers as a whole rarely proofread what they write or ever spell check it. So again, this article may be irrelevant to a vast majority of /.ers.

    Except, of course, me, who has perfect grammar and spelling...NOT

    Nuttles
    Saved by grace

    Saved by grace

    1. Re:tech circles by christowang · · Score: 1

      Just as soon as '/.ers' gets added to the dictionary.

      I can just see it in a third grade spelling bee of the future...

      "Spell Slashdotters"
      "Back Slash.. NO"
      "I'm sorry, that's forward slash, dot, e, r, s"

  82. Seriously, why should we follow it? What made it the gold standard? Why is it better than the Chicago Style? It sounds as if they are attempting to impose their own standards on a rapidly changing field, and are out of touch with the popular practice. Three character state codes? Please.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    1. Re:Why? by gamgee5273 · · Score: 1
      His argument (which, I agree, is lacking) wasn't stating that AP is better than Chicago because you are dealing with two different types of periodicals there.

      Chicago, like MLA (Modern Lanaguage Association) and APA (American Psychological Association), would be used in academic journals whereas AP would be used in newspapers, etc.

  83. Who's he? by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

    Since when has a professor of Communication been more than a reporter? Me, I'll capitalize it without his permission, like I always have. The Internet is a name, much like Earth. It may be capitalized or not at the discretion of the user.

    Let him sit back and teach his students what the rest of the world does when it communicates.

    Not a brand name, yeesh.

  84. Old news in Finland by ajk · · Score: 1

    The leading newspaper in Finland, Helsingin Sanomat made a similar decision several years ago. Although that decision was about the Finnish language, it is relevant here since the relevant bits of capitalization customs are essentially the same in Finnish and English. Of course, not all Finns follow the lead of Helsingin Sanomat :)

    As I recall, the newspaper's argument was that the Internet is a phenomenon and therefore should be treated as a general noun. I don't really buy that, though.

    In the regular flamewars in Finnish newsgroups on this topic, it has been pointed out that nobody actually uses "internet" in the supposed alternate meaning (an Internet Protocol based network of networks that is not necessarily the Internet) in actual text. A message discussing this difference is naturally disqualified.

  85. um. by laserbeak · · Score: 0

    Who Gives A Shit ? No, Seriously?

  86. Re:Psssh. Stoopid Grammer. by jo42 · · Score: 1

    Sorry, that is now wired news - no need to capitalize anymore. We're getting dumber and stoopider and lazier so we shouldn't even have to use punctuation or proper spleelings anyways

  87. Revisionists tick me off! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much longer do we refer to the Earth before we stop capitalizing it? ...or the Eiffel Tower? ...or the Olympics?

  88. Now by doombob · · Score: 1

    Who is going to tell all the word processors of the world the new spellings?

  89. It's called "Internet", not "The Internet", fools! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    None other than Vint Cerf told me that 2 years ago when I met him in Toronto, ON. I don't doubt that there are some smart folks kicking around /., but when it comes to what this big network thing should be called, I'll stick with the advice of one of its founders. As for the capitalization thing, who cares.

  90. internet by 5m477m4n · · Score: 2, Funny

    Okay, so now that 'internet' is not capitalized, can we work on educating people to stop asking 'what version of the internet are you using?'

    --

    ---
    Those who can, do
    Those who can't, teach
    Those who don't know how, supervise
    1. Re:Internet by argent · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your conclusion is valid but your reasoning is backwards.

      The Internet is a proper noun referring to the worldwide public internet managed by the IETF. It is to distinguish this specific internet named the Internet from the private and restricted access internets that it should remain capitalised.

    2. Re:Internet by anser · · Score: 1

      Finally, someone who got it right!

      Regardless of what Wikipedia (itself a public wikipedia, come to think of it) says, "Internet" was intended to refer to the specific internet of publicly accessible computers in the US and beyond, while "internet" refers to any routed/addressible collection of IP based networks. Wired will now be wrong.

  91. yes the internet sucks now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to search and surf for hours on end but now I primarily use it for Instant Messaging and visit no more than 10 sites per day, such as news, hobbies or credit cards/finances.. Frankly there just isnt anything that interesting out there.

  92. thinking to myself by GerbilSocks · · Score: 0

    When I'm camping, I'll go through a period of intense withdrawal. I'll be thinking to myself, "I need to get on the internet", I'm thinking "internet" in lowercase letters.
    It's become ubicquitus.

  93. I suppose they'll also change... by theendlessnow · · Score: 1
    "Windows" to "windows" and start using it as some kind of everyday term.

    e.g.
    Please close your windows.
    Clean up your windows.
    Broken windows.
    Replace your windows.

  94. Pacific Ocean or "pacific ocean"? by 0x0d0a · · Score: 4, Informative

    The internet was never a brand name, thus, there was no need to capitalize it.

    Capitalization is determined by whether or not something is a proper noun, not by whether it is a brand name. The Internet is a proper noun, as opposed to "the internet", which would refer to, say, one's private corporate internet.

    If you'd like other examples: nobody owns the "Pacific Ocean", but because there is only one "Pacific Ocean" (despite being many oceans that could be called pacific) we capitalize it. There are many moons, but only one Moon. There are many presidents, but President as a title is capitalized, because it is used as a proper noun.

    The proper way to refer to Google is "Google" when using the term as a noun -- it is a proper noun that refers to a company. The *verb* "google", meaning "to search for on Google", is not capitalized.

    1. Re:Pacific Ocean or "pacific ocean"? by pauljlucas · · Score: 1
      There are many moons, but only one Moon.
      The proper name for the Earth's moon is Luna.
      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    2. Re:Pacific Ocean or "pacific ocean"? by 1u3hr · · Score: 0, Troll
      There are many presidents, but President as a title is capitalized, because it is used as a proper noun.

      No.

      Guardian Unlimited | Style guide:
      president lc except in title: President Bush, but George Bush, the US president.

    3. Re:Pacific Ocean or "pacific ocean"? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      No.

      Hmm, maybe I was too quick there. If by "President as a title is capitalized" you mean only when used as "President XXX", retract my "no", we're in agreement.

    4. Re:Pacific Ocean or "pacific ocean"? by 0x0d0a · · Score: 0

      We're violently agreeing.

    5. Re:Pacific Ocean or "pacific ocean"? by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2, Informative

      In astronomical parlance, you are correct. Or if you are Roman. However "Moon" is, in common English, the correct proper noun to refer to the single moon that circles Earth.

    6. Re:Pacific Ocean or "pacific ocean"? by Denshuu · · Score: 1

      That is exactly what he said. Reread it.

    7. Re:Pacific Ocean or "pacific ocean"? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      That is exactly what he said. Reread it.

      Read my post of 8 minutes ago.

    8. Re:Pacific Ocean or "pacific ocean"? by pauljlucas · · Score: 1
      ... the correct proper noun ...
      Sigh... Again, nobody heeds my sig. I never said "proper noun"; I said "proper name."
      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    9. Re:Pacific Ocean or "pacific ocean"? by BrynM · · Score: 2, Informative
      The proper name for the Earth's moon is Luna.
      And the proper name of our sun is Sol... But it's undecided whether or not that's an acronym (Outa Luck) ;)
      --
      US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
    10. Re:Pacific Ocean or "pacific ocean"? by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      I never said "proper noun"; I said "proper name."

      I'm aware of that.

    11. Re:Pacific Ocean or "pacific ocean"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you should have replied to the actual post, which said there is only one Moon, it didn't say anything about its proper name.

    12. Re:Pacific Ocean or "pacific ocean"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some would say that the Earth is *our* moon. But that would belittle the name of our Moon, which is the Moon.

    13. Re:Pacific Ocean or "pacific ocean"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't capitalize 'moon' even when referring to Luna. "Americans might be walking on the moon again within 15 years, or 20 at the outside". -- From an MSNBC article.

  95. Did he pass English class? by JediGrover · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It seems to me that all this de-capitalization business is a bit silly. It should be a moot point. Words in the English language are capitalized when: (a) they are used to start a sentence. (b) they are used as a "proper noun." The term "internet" without the capital 'I' is an "improper noun", i.e., normal noun. Traditionally, the improper noun form has been used to mean "a network of networks." However, when one is talking about *the* (commonly known) worldwide network of networks, overseen by some authorities with a documentable history; a proper noun "Internet" is not only possible, but proper! If you want to de-capitalize something, how about newspapers quit printing "West Texas" and do it right: "west Texas," as Texas is not seperated into two states the way, say, Virginia and West Virginia are. "Texas" is the only proper noun in the phrase "west Texas" ("west" isn't even a noun, it's an adjective in this case!) Why do I bother? Ppl r goeeeng 2 rite lke ths N teh footure newayzzz--'coz nobdy karzzz. Or worst, it'll be L33T.

    1. Re:Did he pass English class? by JediGrover · · Score: 1

      I'm sure many didn't catch the fact that I puposely used "worst" incorrectly here. "worst" = "worse" as is the mode today...sort of like everyone seems to spell the word "lose" (as in "Did you lose your file?") as "loose."

  96. More importantly... by cafebabe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Can we now ban apostrophes in "CPU's", "MP3's", etc.? It just kills me that even The New York Times (which is normally a stickler for grammar) has adopted that bastardized punctuation as their standard.

    --
    When violence rules the world outside / And the headlines make me want to cry / It's not the time to just keep quiet
    1. Re:More importantly... by chary · · Score: 1

      In my new world order, anyone found misusing apostrophes will have one inserted in an even more inconvenient place...

    2. Re:More importantly... by chary · · Score: 1

      (Hyphens can take care of themselves...)

    3. Re:More importantly... by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Rather have them say "Central Processing Unit's" or "MPEG, Layer 3's"? Oh, I know, "Moving Picture Expert Group, Audio Compression Level 3 files"! ATM's? Are they also bad? The acronym is treated as a word because many people only know it as such. It's a sign of the times, a compression of information into a comprehensible unit.

    4. Re:More importantly... by Rorschach1 · · Score: 1

      Proper apostrophe use is a lost cause. There's this place in the local mall call Sportscard Fantasy's. I've always wanted to go rip that damned apostrophe off their sign, but Fantasys isn't the proper plural either. In fact, it sounds more like the merger of a fruit juice company and computer consulting firm.

    5. Re:More importantly... by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      Rather have them say "Central Processing Unit's" or "MPEG, Layer 3's"? Oh, I know, "Moving Picture Expert Group, Audio Compression Level 3 files"!

      Dude...you totally missed the point...

      ATM's? Are they also bad?

      Yes. Horrifying.

      The acronym is treated as a word because many people only know it as such.

      The problem is not with treating the abbreviation as a word. The problem is with forming the plural by adding an apostrophe before the 's'. There should be only an 's' to form a plural. Writing "I have two CPU's" to indicate a plural is just as wrong as writing "I have two cat's". (It leaves the reader wondering, "You have two cat's...what? Two cat's ears?")

      If the intent is to form the possessive adjective, there's nothing wrong with "CPU's". For example, "This CPU's heatsink is loose" is a perfectly valid usage.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    6. Re:More importantly... by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Ahhh. My apologies. I concur wholeheartedly with the rally against misuse of apostrophes. I was under the mistaken notion that you were an anti-acronym luddite ;)

  97. Internet by nullhero · · Score: 1

    How many Internet's are there. If the Internet was one of many different (meaning US internet, Mexico internet, UK internet, etc) nets than I would agree. But it is just one thing and therefore should be capitalized.

    My boss of my last job asked be to capitalize the word intranet but I told him that there are different's intranets. There was ours, the vendors with worked with, are customers, etc...everyone has their own intranet but there is only one Internet and it should be capitalized.

    me

    --
    Save Pangaea!! Stop Continental Drift!!
  98. Capitals... by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's funny that in the development of the roman alphabet, originally there were only capitals. Lowercase letters were developed to make text more legible. So what do we actually still use capitals for? I mean, capitalizing names or words in a title or nouns etc. is just a convention. Just like spelling. In Europe, languages occasionally undergo a spelling change. What bugs me is why they never change the spelling to be consistent, let alone phonetic (e.g. corresponding 1 to 1 with the sound).

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    1. Re:Capitals... by ShieldWolf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Certain languages ARE phonetic, see Turkish: every letter has a unique sound that doesn't change with the context. It makes teaching and learning the language very easy since you know how to pronounce a work just by reading it. There are also no grammatical exceptions, making it basically a perfect language. ;)

      Also some words in English DO become phonetic over time:
      e.g. draught vs. draft

      --
      just = (My)Opinion.toCents();
    2. Re:Capitals... by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      ``Certain languages ARE phonetic, see Turkish: every letter has a unique sound that doesn't change with the context.''

      And also the other way around? It's fairly common that one can deduce the pronunciation from the spelling, but the other way around is usually much harder. And what about stress? Is that also deducable just from the rules, or are there exceptions there?

      I have been to Turkey, and it seems that the spelling is indeed phonetic, but I don't recall enough turkish to be sure about the stress.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    3. Re:Capitals... by bonkeroo+buzzeye · · Score: 1
      A Plan for the Improvement of English Spelling
      by Mark Twain

      For example, in Year 1 that useless letter "c" would be dropped
      to be replased either by "k" or "s", and likewise "x" would no longer
      be part of the alphabet. The only kase in which "c" would be retained
      would be the "ch" formation, which will be dealt with later. Year 2
      might reform "w" spelling, so that "which" and "one" would take the
      same konsonant, wile Year 3 might well abolish "y" replasing it with
      "i" and Iear 4 might fiks the "g/j" anomali wonse and for all.
      Jenerally, then, the improvement would kontinue iear bai iear
      with Iear 5 doing awai with useless double konsonants, and Iears 6-12
      or so modifaiing vowlz and the rimeining voist and unvoist konsonants.
      Bai Iear 15 or sou, it wud fainali bi posibl tu meik ius ov thi
      ridandant letez "c", "y" and "x" -- bai now jast a memori in the maindz
      ov ould doderez -- tu riplais "ch", "sh", and "th" rispektivli.
      Fainali, xen, aafte sam 20 iers ov orxogrefkl riform, wi wud
      hev a lojikl, kohirnt speling in ius xrewawt xe Ingliy-spiking werld.
      Gotta love fortune. And tangents.
    4. Re:Capitals... by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      Phonetic based on whose pronounciation?

      Shall we spell things as they're pronounced in Northern England, Southern England, Australia or Northern America?

      English works best with abstracted spelling....though that doesn't mean that there's not room for improvement, but any changes towards more phonetic spelling are likely to be very gradual...

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    5. Re:Capitals... by taycalmac · · Score: 1

      Yeah. It is called, "dumbing down".

      --
      A clean chord is a happy chord...
  99. We should go back to calling it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We should go back to calling it the "Information Superhighway". I love it when my coworkers call it that.

    1. Re:We should go back to calling it... by hendersj · · Score: 1

      Seems appropriate - it's loaded with collisions.

      --
      Insanity is a gradual process; don't rush it.
  100. word processors should change also by tutwabee · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've never capitalized 'internet' but my word processors always want me to. Hopefully this is changed soon also.

  101. USB thingies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just wish this mysterious cabal we think of as the Common Usage Council (i.e., "They") could settle on one term for the USB drive.

    I've heard / seen them called: Thumb Drives, Flash Drives, Pen Drives, Stick Drives, USB Drives, Key Drives, Keychain Drives, USB Key Drives, etc, etc, ad naseum.

    I guess my personal favorite, "Weenus Drive", is completely out of the question. (Sort of puts a new spin on the write-protect toggle, tho.)

  102. Republicans? by rd_syringe · · Score: 1

    Yours is the second post whining and blaming Republicans. Why don't you pin the blame on the late night morons like Leno who repeat it every time Gore gets in the news?

    Oh, I forgot, everything is a vast, right-wing conspiracy. Democrats never smear their opponents or say a negative word about them. You know, like having divorce records released to the public forcing the candidate to resign, or filming entire "documentaries" that stretch the truth to bash someone. It's all flowers and innocence over on the left.

  103. s/capitalization/capitalisation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    At least get your spelling right, sheesh

  104. New front for Microsoft? by DeathAndTaxes · · Score: 1

    If MS keeps capitalizing 'Internet' and Wired stops capitalizing 'internet', will we have a new war...Perhaps this is the E/etiquette wars?

  105. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You were rated "+4 Insightful" though you just stated your preference for lowercase without supporting or explaining it. Why bother with capitals at all? You capitalized your login, the letters "MS", "Word", "I", and the first letter in each sentence. To use your flippant words: grammar does demand it. You follow some of the rules... why not follow the rest. The rest of the world has caught on; check the front page of Slashdot: it's chocked full of grammatical errors.

  106. In related news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Apple is now required to capitalize the first letter of iPod, iMac, and iBook.

  107. Re: email vs e-mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Has noone RTFA? The submitter had the email thing backwards, wired is now using e-mail, precisely because the 'e' is a contraction for electronic, and thus a hyphen is needed to show that letter were omitted.

  108. and while we're at it... by siskbc · · Score: 1
    and stop calling them "sights" unless they're tourist attractions to be looked at and photographed.

    And how about "cites," unless they're going in your bibliography (and even that's grammatically incorrect).

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

  109. Rest of the world? by spisska · · Score: 1

    Umm. Most of the rest of the world already does spell internet without the capitalization.

    I used to work at an English-language newspaper in central Europe and we made the editorial decision to stop capitalizing in late 2002. Yes, yes we all knew about the 'an internet (network of networks) vs. the Internet' argument, but in the end, we dropped the capital to keep better consistency with the rules of English grammar -- i.e. that it's more akin to 'the sun' than to 'the Queen'.

    I've wondered more than once why the capital letter was thought neccessary in the first place.

    1. Re:Rest of the world? by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      I used to work at an English-language newspaper in central Europe and we made the editorial decision to stop capitalizing in late 2002. Yes, yes we all knew about the 'an internet (network of networks) vs. the Internet' argument, but in the end, we dropped the capital to keep better consistency with the rules of English grammar -- i.e. that it's more akin to 'the sun' than to 'the Queen'.

      The Sun is often capitalized, and it is certainly at least as correct as "sun" when referring to that star about which we are orbiting.

      Of course, for techies, using the term "Sun" capitalized poses a risk of confusion with a large technology company...

    2. Re:Rest of the world? by Toresica · · Score: 1

      Of course, for techies, using the term "Sun" capitalized poses a risk of confusion with a large technology company...

      Or with a newspaper, for those of us who have a local Sun newspaper. Although that's not confined to techies.

  110. Oh my goodness, next it will be God by limbo1686 · · Score: 1

    Wonder if wired is bold enough to mess with God.

  111. It's a proper name by Dracolytch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We still capitalize the Earth, Atlantic Ocean, and McDonalds. Just because something's world-known and basically ubiquitous doesn't keep it from being a proper noun.

    ~D

    --
    This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    1. Re:It's a proper name by kenp2002 · · Score: 1

      Dude wtf, how did they not brain wash you! It's Gaia, The Liquid Desert of the East, and Mc Satanmakesyoufatcuztheyputdrugzinthefoodtomakeyoua ddictedlikecigarettesandherioneevildrugdealersbadb adbad.

      --
      -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
  112. 'I've got internet!' by FridayBob · · Score: 1

    Even worse: here in the Netherlands they don't refer to it as the Internet, but simply as 'internet'. So, now it's 'I found it on internet', just as it's 'I saw it on TV'. It seems to me that the Dutch technical crowd still refers to it as 'the Internet', but the popular press is just hopeless.

    1. Re:'I've got internet!' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I had the good fortune of meeting and speaking with Dr. Vinton Cerf, widely regarded as the co-founder of '[I|i]nternet'. He makes a point of NEVER calling it 'the Internet' (in speech anyways...I haven't read many of his papers), but instead indicates that it should be called 'Internet'. Pardon me while I take the side of one of the network's founders.

    2. Re:'I've got internet!' by FridayBob · · Score: 1

      Hmm... I always thought 'the Internet' sounded logical, if only because of its clearly defined address space. Did the good Doctor explain himself? Perhaps he compares the Internet to the global phone network.

    3. Re:'I've got internet!' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm... I always thought 'the Internet' sounded logical, if only because of its clearly defined address space. Did the good Doctor explain himself? Perhaps he compares the Internet to the global phone network.

      He never did explain himself, no. Nor did I think to ask him about it in detail unfortunately. In retrospect, I'd be interested to hear his response.

  113. The connected Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can a publication that called itself Wired be so disconnected?

  114. cool. by ZipR · · Score: 1

    Now if only someone could convince the NY Times (and many others) to stop using CD's as the plural of CD, I'll be very very happy.

    1. Re:cool. by hendersj · · Score: 1

      Considering that CD's is an accepted plural form, I wouldn't look for that happening any time soon.

      According to the American Heritage Book of English Usage:

      "Usage with regard to forming the plurals of letters, numbers, and abbreviations varies somewhat. In some cases you have a choice between adding -s or -'s, although the trend is increasingly to add -s alone: three As or three A's; the ABCs or the ABC's; the 1900s or the 1900's; PhDs or PhD's; several IOUs or several IOU's. With lowercase letters, symbols, abbreviations with periods, and in cases where confusion might arise without an apostrophe, use -'s to form the plural: p's and q's; +'s; -'s; M.A.'s; A's and I's; 2's. Mainly your goal is to be as clear as possible and avoid confusion."

      --
      Insanity is a gradual process; don't rush it.
  115. It's more like email was ditched for e-mail by LionMage · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Is this the next logical step after ditching 'e-mail' in favor of 'email'

    Actually, if you follow the link in this particular line of the slashdot article, you'll find Wired News's article on why they abandoned 'email' for 'e-mail' -- because 'e-mail' is grammatically correct, and 'email' is not, at least according to their reasoning. (It's actually a pretty good article, and one I read years ago.) Wired News did this ostensibly because the medium has "grown up" and the stylistic rules for the publication should reflect this. Or something.

    Were one to read the slashdot article without following the link, you'd think that Wired dumped the hyphen from 'e-mail,' when in fact they didn't dump the hyphen at all -- rather, they started using it. This usage agrees with Webster and the OED and various other style guides in the industry. The previous use of 'email' without the hyphen was what they got rid of.

    Personally, I don't care if people capitalize 'internet' or not. I prefer to capitalize it in most of my writing, because the Internet is a thing, a unique entity unto itself, and deserves to be considered a proper noun. It's not quite the same thing as television, which is a more nebulous and abstract concept (the word could describe the technology in general, the broadcast standard, the hardware used to display the broadcasts, or the programming that is being broadcast).
  116. I like to call it George by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...(n/t)

  117. Don't stop there, Wired! by argent · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There's lots of capitalised proper nouns that are "obviously" unique and don't need to be capitalised. Wired should drop the uppercase letter for "god", "united nations", and "president of the united states". That'd generate lots more juicy controversy as well, which is after all the point of the excersize.

    1. Re:Don't stop there, Wired! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      There is no controversy. This guy is not qualified to be an editor if he thinks he can just randonly decide not to capitalize proper nouns because he thinks his personal opinions on technology trends should get the English usage rules for everyone else.
      Without DNS and ICANN there would be no Internet. The Internet refers to a very specific body of technology with a very specific history and operation. There is no way in hell you can say that this is not a proper noun just because it is commonly used.

  118. Wired and their "next moves" by 0x0d0a · · Score: 5, Funny

    Actually, if you're just trying to be Wired (which means being relentlessly hip to try to avoid losing their self-assumed position as authority on Internet culture), there's a fair number of predictable "next moves":

    Internet becomes "iNet". This is to fit with Apple's product naming scheme, which is cool, and therefore something that Wired is terribly concerned about associating itself with.

    "I see" becomes "i c". Wired constantly promotes the claim that the Internet (oops, sorry -- "internet") is going to completely drive our lives and our culture, and currently most authorship is done via chat. What better way to argue their point than to let themselves be completely swayed by typos and shortcuts from chat?

    Micropayments are "hip", so Wired stops selling "subscriptions" and starts selling "micropayments in twelve chunk block minimums".

    "Internet time", or "beats" (a desperate attempt by Swatch, who has put every useful gadget and more onto a watch, to produce new required features to drive watch sales) will be adopted by Wired. I'm not sure that "beats" are hip or not, but they're certainly stupid and Internet culture-oriented, so Wired should love them. They can say "It took me @45 to write this article".

    Wired will no longer refer to themselves as a "magazine". "Magazines" are pre-Internet culture, and "'zine" is only marginally more "hip". No, tablet computers are "hip", and so Wired will sell "paper tablets".

    Speaking of "'zine", almost any word can be made more hip by chopping some prefix off and replacing the prefix with an apostrophe. We know this because a couple of sci fi authors have done this. Therefore, I won't "Download and read Wired on the Internet by 4:00 PM". Instead, I'll "'nload 'n rez wired on the internet by @3452". Where would we be without Wired for entertainment?

    1. Re:Wired and their "next moves" by aardwolf204 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but if we didnt subscribe to wired our magazine rack wouldnt be full of colorful squares from the side.

      Personally I thought the articles in the Yellow / Black issue were really good, but they need to bring back the Jap School Girl Watch thing from Green / White - Red / Silver...

      PS: Where did all the silver go?

      --
      Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
    2. Re:Wired and their "next moves" by billsf · · Score: 1

      Right :-)

      # ifconfig fxp0 inet 192.168.101.100 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
      Oh,
      # route add default 192.168.101.1
      # vi /etc/resolv.conf .....

      Seriously i (decapitalised) don't see them ever resolving anything. Wired is tired. Yes, they ship all those ads overseas too. It costs a bundle.

      Finally remember they ripped off Mondo (Reality Hackers and even something else before that) for the whole concept.

      R.I.P.

    3. Re:Wired and their "next moves" by postgrep · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Part of this problem can be blamed on the rising population of "tweens" , "pre-teens" and "teeny-boppers". While I'm not blaming them for it, they are a large chunk of it. Everytime you see a movie, tv show or similar with one of these types in it, they drop their "special catch phrases". e.g: "Oh, lets go surf the web and check our email!" or "Lets go read a zine on the net yo!" To me, these people are damn annoying, and should be shot. And theres also the people who try to jump on the bandwagon, and make somethings disgracefull. i.e: jocks making zines, saying stupid things AND STILL calling nerds nerds because they use a computer. The world is in a decline.

    4. Re:Wired and their "next moves" by Guppy06 · · Score: 3, Informative

      "(a desperate attempt by Swatch, who has put every useful gadget and more onto a watch, to produce new required features to drive watch sales)"

      I swear, the whole .beat system has got to be the stupidest thing I have ever come across (and Sega was even stupider for implementing it in PSO!).

      We already have a very nice time standard for the internet. It's called "Coordinated Universal Time" or UTC for short (because the acronym UTC confuses speakers of all languages equally). The internet even has its own protocol for distributing UTC to various machines. The only problem one might have with UTC is the possibility of leap seconds cropping up every now and then, but all you need to do is poll your favorite NTP server and your clock will be back on track.

      But Swatch has to go and break things for the sole purpose of trying to be "cool."

      First off, they're stupid enough to use the length of a mean solar day as their standard, which means they inherit the problems of UTC. They could have tried some different standard, something that made their "beat" system an actual alternative to UTC instead of simply dressing it up in a new set of clothes, but that might have resembled innovation too much. The only difference now is that we talk about leap beats instead of leap seconds.

      Then they go off and break the Prime Meridian. Ever since Harrison started to build his little trinkets (now he could build a watch!) over two centuries ago just about everybody has been using the line of longitude passing through Greenwich, England. But no, God forbid they conform to anything vaguely resembling a standard, they have to pick their own meridian. Continuing with their theme of "just dress up UTC," they don't actually pick the meridian going through Swatch headquarters, they pick the nearest multiple of 15 degrees from the Greenwich Meridian.

      But the real flaw in the system, the one that drives the final nail in the coffin of this God-awful idea that can serve as a symbol of the dot-com bubble all too well, was the idea of dividing the day into an even 1000 "beats." Yay. 1000. A nice round number. It's just like SI. Except we already have SI!!!. And the SI unit of time is not the mean solar day, it is the second! Everything is seconds! 60 seconds in a minute! 3600 seconds in an hour! 86,400 seconds in an SI day! And now we have 86.4 seconds in a beat? Yay! We now have the first man-made unit of time that isn't an integer number of seconds! At a time when people such as myself catch hell from self-styled "metric" zealots for measuring things in units of 0.3048 m and 0.45359237 kg, Swatch has now developed a system of measuring time that everybody can agree is fucked up!

      Swatch could have done something neat. They could have been constructively different instead of just being different in an effort to be "cool" (which they apparently also failed miserably at). How about a system of time that does nothing but count off integer seconds? No minutes, hours, days or years, just seconds. They pick some arbitrary time to start counting from (say, 2000 January 1 00:00:00 UTC or 1999 December 31 12:00:00 UTC, since "Y2K" was so freakin' trendy at the time) and have a watch that tells you how many hectoseconds it's been since then (they could even call them "beats" instead). It'd be simple, it'd be different, and it'd have absolutely nothing to do with "time in the real world" (since so few people are able to divide any given integer by 864 in their heads). And it'd have an advantage over all the other time standards widely used today in that it is purely SI (UTC has that leap-second fudge factor to add into TAI, and even the TAI put out by BIPM ticks off an MJD every 86,400 s). The only problem I'd have with it then is the fact that the WWVB signal doesn't carry information on the current offset between UTC and TAI (and NTP does even less), which would mean having to put the TAI offset into my radio-controlled watch by hand, but I'd put up with it for the niftiness factor alone.

      Does Swatch even offer a radio-controlled watch, or is keeping accurate time not important enough a feature to put into one of their watches?

    5. Re:Wired and their "next moves" by Flunitrazepam · · Score: 1

      i disagree!

      --
      1) Your analysis is based on bad assumptions so your result is way off. 2) You're a sick bastard for fucking a horse.
    6. Re:Wired and their "next moves" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      @3452 isn't possible since there are only 1000 .beats in a day.

      FWIW, 4:00 PM PST would be @916.

  119. Wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The end of php?

    I certainly hope not, I use php a lot still.

    Let's go /. ?> so that we still get our <?php

  120. URL - url? by otisg · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Are we also going to start lower-casing acronyms?
    It seems that everything that requires a bit more thinking or complexity, even if it's trivial, gets simplified. That is why we no longer have beautiful architecture, furniture, et cetera with ornaments, but rather super-simple, utilitarian everything.
    Lame.

    --
    Simpy
  121. It's been "email" for years by McD · · Score: 1

    I'm with Knuth on this one. See the bottom of the page.

    --
    "Given the pace of technology, I propose we leave math to the machines and go play outside." -- Calvin
  122. or... by jav1231 · · Score: 1

    Maybe they're just "Vive La Loafing" as here.

  123. what!?! by tuanjim_2001 · · Score: 1
    Looks like someone, cough taco cough, lifted something directly from another news site/aggragator. lisnews.

    At least give a reference when you steal something word for word!

    --
    "If a quarter is two bits, then a dollar's a byte." -R Deric Miller
    1. Re:what!?! by gerardrj · · Score: 1

      Time stamp from the /. article: Posted by CmdrTaco on 08-16-04 10:30 AM
      Time stamp from the LiS arcicle: posted by John on Monday August 16, @10:44AM

      Now.. neither tells me the time zone offset but the /. article appears to have been published 14 minutes in advance of the LISnews article.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    2. Re:what!?! by tuanjim_2001 · · Score: 1
      That's odd. Mine had it posted a full 3.5 hours before. I think someone has been fooling around with everyones clocks. Lets see what lisnews says.

      --
      "If a quarter is two bits, then a dollar's a byte." -R Deric Miller
  124. Wired's just being "hep"... and inconsistent by ianscot · · Score: 1

    "A site on the Web is a Web site... Website, capped or uncapped, is jibberish--it means the same thing as 'zhoxting.'"
    -- from "Lapsing into a Comma, A Curmudgeon's Guide to the Many Things That Can Go Wrong in Print -- and How to Avoid Them" by Bill Walsh, Copy Desk Chief, Business Desk, the Washington Post

    There's an argument here about whether this is truly a proper noun, but Wired doesn't state it clearly, and they're backing it up with some silliness. People don't capitalize "Bush" because the man's important, they capitalize it because it's a proper name. We don't take the caps down when we just use someone's last name, or when we refer to Microsoft without saying "Corporation." Wired is saying "World Wide Web" is a proper noun, but that "Web" isn't part of that proper name -- it's "facial tissue," a generic term. They need to work that out a little better to satisfy me.

    Internet is the name of a specific thing, not a type of thing. I'm not sure I'm with them as far as "net," either. That's a nickname based on a contraction, isn't it? Do you call Richard Nixon "tricky dick" in print?

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  125. "internet" and Ebonics by 0x0d0a · · Score: 0

    I never found a reason to capitalize works like internet, web, etc. unless grammar demanded it (like starting a sentence). The question now is, how long is it going to take the rest of the world to catch on.

    Cruel world, isn't it? I'm sure the Ebonics people sympathize with your plight.

  126. Can't we just... by Skedoozy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Make Mac users create their own net and then they can call it the iNternet? Then we can still have the Internet to ourselves.

  127. Snoop Dog already has the right name.... by FerretFrottage · · Score: 0

    Izzlefooshizllenet

    --
    "Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change."
  128. Film at eleven by Minwee · · Score: 1
    In other news, the name of the magazine "Tired" will no longer be spelled with a W.

    "There's no reason to spell it that way now. In fact, there never was one."

  129. While we're complaining... by EvanED · · Score: 4, Informative

    The abbreviation 'i.e.' does NOT mean 'for example.' If you want 'for example', use 'e.g.'

    The former is an abbreviation for the latin 'id est', which means 'that is'. It's a rephrasing of what came before.

    Your use is probably not strictly wrong, as reading it with 'that is' works, just 'e.g.' ('exempli grati') would work better.

    1. Re:While we're complaining... by Skidge · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I realized that upon rereading my post, but, alas, there's no edit function here. The preview button is your friend, I guess.

    2. Re:While we're complaining... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      grati as in beer. ;)

    3. Re:While we're complaining... by dtungsten · · Score: 1
      The abbreviation 'i.e.' does NOT mean 'for example.' If you want 'for example', use 'e.g.'
      I always thought it was the other way around - that 'i.e.' stood for something like 'in exampli' and people just used 'e.g.' incorrectly because it looked/sounded like 'example' or 'eggzample' (not intended as a pun, just that people don't know how to spell).

      According to Dictionary.com, you are right. So I was mistaken. Thanks for the help!
    4. Re:While we're complaining... by EvanED · · Score: 1

      I always thought it was the other way around - that 'i.e.' stood for something like 'in exampli'

      For the longest time, I did to... ;-)

      Thought both were for example, one from the English "in example", one from the latin.

  130. In other news.. by dacarr · · Score: 2, Funny

    frigidaire xeroxes kleenex. kodak at eleven.

    --
    This sig no verb.
  131. A related issue with another magazine by Zarhan · · Score: 1

    A certain finnish computing magazine has a policy that there will be no capitalization of ANY term. That's right, all acronyms (GPRS, VoIP, LAN, ATM) will be in lower case (gprs, voip, lan). If it's a product that has some weird-ass capitalization (iTunes, iMac) they just do it all-lowercase. (How would you use iTunes in beginning of a sentence, anyway? ITunes?). However, names are not in lower case, ever. IBM is still IBM. Actually, if you check out the page now, you can see in the left pane a blurb about Gmail (in uppercase) and video at VGA resolution (in lower case).

    I gather that they originally came to this decision because lots of writers started to ask the questions that how are they going to write all those L33TAcRoNyMs that everything that is nice about language, and they made a blanket decision. (Again, how do you use iTunes in beginning of a sentence...).

    This sometimes pisses the more technical engineering crowd off because they prefer the original form, but they have stuck to their line. (Oh, and I'm not a subscriber :))

    However, even they have not touched names. Internet, The. There are also intranets, extranets and internets.

  132. thanks for the fish. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome! To Planet earth!

  133. That Wikipedia entry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That entry in Wikipedia is pretty unusual, in that it heatedly expresses an unorthodox personal opinion at variance with common usage.

    Most of the Wikipedia steers well clear of personal opinion and controversy. It's a pity that this key entry is so awful.

    1. Re:That Wikipedia entry by Raul654 · · Score: 1

      You missed the point. On Wikipedia, every article has an associated discussion page, where people can talk about the article (so they can discuss differences, ask questions, etc). Rather than linking to the "Internet" article, they linked to the *talk* page for the internet article.

      --


      To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
      --E.C. Stanton
  134. To misquote Bill Hicks... by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

    I'll get over the capital I when you get over Jesus.

    --
    By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
  135. dictionary.com by .com+b4+.storm · · Score: 1

    internet
    <networking> (Note: capital "I"). The Internet is the largest internet (with a small "i") in the world.

    Source: The Free On-line Dictionary of Computing, © 1993-2004 Denis Howe

    (courtesy of dictionary.com)

    --
    "Wow, you're like some kind of superhero able to ward off happiness and success at every turn."
    -- Ryan Stiles
  136. Must be a slow news day. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aren't there more important things for folks to worry about? Such as making the Internet/internet more secure instead of worrying about how to spell it?

  137. Learn your Latin roots! by Valdrax · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I thought the point was that my 192.168.1.0/24 behind my linksys access point is "an internet". The 66.35.250.0/24 slashdot is on is "an internet" (unlike mine, a publicly routeable one). An internet is any network that uses, surprise surprise, the "internet protocol".

    What you are talking about is an intranet, not an internet. The Internet is the connection of multiple networks to each other. It is a network of networks, thus it sits between other networks and earns the inter- prefix. Intra- means within one's own logical grouping. A corporate network, Slashdot's server farms, and your person home network are intranets because they are a network of machines within one logical organization.

    This is why there can be only one Internet unless you make a completely separate other network between networks that doesn't talk to the first one at all. That's very unlikely to happen until we start building colonies on other worlds, and we'll probably have slow, laggy connections between them even then. I see no reason to decapitalize the Internet since there can be only one. (No Highlander jokes, please.)

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:Learn your Latin roots! by Theatetus · · Score: 1
      What you are talking about is an intranet, not an internet.

      "Intranet" is a buzzword that was made up for suits and somehow managed to catch on. All intranets are internets.

      This is why there can be only one Internet unless you make a completely separate other network between networks that doesn't talk to the first one at all.

      Nope, if I route 192.168.0.0/24 and 10.0.0.0/8 in my house, that's an internet. Since I route 192.168.0.0/24 to 0.0.0.0/0, that's also an internet.

      --
      All's true that is mistrusted
    2. Re:Learn your Latin roots! by technothrasher · · Score: 1
      What you are talking about is an intranet, not an internet.


      Ah, but intranet is more of a marketing term than a networking one. You've been fooled into thinking that stupid marketing terms actually make sense! An intranet is actually a grouping of websites and applications not accessable to people outside an organization. What you describe as an intranet really *is* an internet- a collection of separate networks connected via routers/gateways. What the parent poster described is a LAN.

    3. Re:Learn your Latin roots! by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I thought the point was that my 192.168.1.0/24 behind my linksys access point is "an internet". The 66.35.250.0/24 slashdot is on is "an internet" (unlike mine, a publicly routeable one). An internet is any network that uses, surprise surprise, the "internet protocol".
      What you are talking about is an intranet, not an internet. The Internet is the connection of multiple networks to each other. It is a network of networks, thus it sits between other networks and earns the inter- prefix. Intra- means within one's own logical grouping. A corporate network, Slashdot's server farms, and your person home network are intranets because they are a network of machines within one logical organization.

      A collection of machines that can talk directly to each other over a common link layer (like ethernet) is a network. A network may use IP for convenience, but if everyone's using the same subnet, its just a simple network. (Calling it an intranet may be correct, but it's not very informative (unless you're talking about administrative domains), since an intranet could be a network or an internetwork.)

      A collection of interconnected networks that communicate using a common link-layer independant internetworking protocol (like IP) is an internet (regardless of whether it is connected to the Internet).

      The Internet is the largest connected internet.

      -jim

    4. Re:Learn your Latin roots! by timeOday · · Score: 1
      internet = a network that connects other networks.

      In the beginning, when time was young, a school district might have a network in each school, plus an internet to connect them together. But of course there was no connection between various disticts' internets. A company might have a lan in each building, and an internet to connect their buildings around town, but different companies weren't connected to each other.

      Then came the Internet to end all internets, and today it's (virtually) the only one, so we don't think of it as a particular "internet" any more.

    5. Re:Learn your Latin roots! by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It is a network of networks, thus it sits between other networks and earns the inter- prefix. Intra- means within one's own logical grouping.

      You are attempting to pick words apart to prove what they actually mean. It'd be nice if languages were logical and that approach actually worked, but it doesn't.

      "Anti-semitic", for example, doesn't mean "against semites", but "hating Jews", since that's what it was first coined for. "Homophobia" is not "fear of similarity" but of "homosexuals".

      First there were networks. Then there was "internet protocol", which could be used to connect networks. Then there was "internet", any set of 2 or more hosts using internet protocol. Only 15 years later was "intranet" coined, to mean a LAN using application protocols popularized on the Internet.

    6. Re:Learn your Latin roots! by MrMonty · · Score: 1
      I see no reason to decapitalize the Internet since there can be only one. (No Highlander jokes, please.)

      Internet2?
  138. Other things with too many names by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

    WiFi/802.11b/Wireless Ethernet

    flat panel LCD/LCD/flat panel

    TiVO/PVR

    Red Hat/RedHat/Redhat

  139. Grammar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Internet is a proper noun (in this case, a name). It is the Internet. There is only one, and it has a name. Of course it should be capitalised.

    Same with "the Web", although I think saying "Web" is silly anyway, as it's a "net", not a "web". Unless there are some historical issues I am unaware of.

    Now, "Net", on the other hand, was wrong from the beginning. To denote the fact that we left out the "Inter" bit, we need to add an apostrophe, thus making the abbreviation "'Net". That's how I've always written it.

    The IHT article mentions how "Phonograph" used to be capitalised. Well whoop-te-do. There were hundreds of phonographs going around, so of course they should not be capitalised. It's not a brand name, there are many of them. The 'Net, on the other hand, is singular. There is only one, there always will be only one. Even if similar systems are created in the future, they will be called something different from "the Internet". Perhaps they will be called "internets", but there will always be only one, unique Internet.

    1. Re:Grammar... by Eric+Smith · · Score: 1
      It is the Internet.
      True.
      There is only one
      False. There are many small internets. (Generally very small by comparison to the Internet.)

      The fact that there exist internets distinct from the Internet, or even that it this is possible, makes it all the more important to carefully distinguish them.

      it has a name. Of course it should be capitalised.
      Definitely!
      Even if similar systems are created in the future, they will be called something different from "the Internet".
      Doubtful. For instance, if someone invented a new communication system tomorrow using third order quantum negative flux gradients (or whatever Star Trek technobabble you prefer), and it was useful for networking, it would be used by the Internet. It wouldn't be some entirely separate new network.

      Or, if the people owning the patents were stupid, they might deliberately keep it completely separate, in which case it would not be commercially successful.

  140. Fuque Wired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fuque wired and the horse they rode in on

  141. it's about time! by DulcetTone · · Score: 1

    People who capitalize "internet" are the same grandmas who call it "the world wide web" and "the information super-highway". And those who use 'net look like persnickety wankers right off.

    --
    tone
  142. I say drop the "the" by Captain+Rotundo · · Score: 1

    That way we can use "Internet" and it has the feeling of a concrete proper noun, rather than "the Internet" / "the internet" inviting confussion.

  143. geeks shall inhibit the Earth by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    There is only one internet. I'd move on, if I could find that damn "any" key to continue

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  144. Semantics by xihr · · Score: 1

    What a completely boring game of semantics. Who cares whether it's capitalized or not? Why in the world is it news when they choose not to capitalize it any longer? What self-absorbed nonsense!

  145. we should switch to sevencube and... by pdamoc · · Score: 1

    ... avoid such stories about capitalisation. :o)
    sevencube blog

  146. Actually, the NYT has a point. by panurge · · Score: 3, Informative
    One use of apostrophes between a noun and the plural s has been to indicate that the noun is not a normal English word. (There is more about this in Eats, shoots and leaves by Lynne Truss.)
    MP3s is a good example. "MP3" is not a word. It is not even an acronym, since it has no discernible vowels and the "3" is clearly not a pronounceable letter. Furthermore, it does not have a meaningful plural form: MP3s would presumably be pronounced "em pee three ess", but the actual pronunciation "em pee threes" seems to suggest that there are a set of threes of the MP variety.

    A really stuffy way of indicating what is intended would be to write "MP3"s, to indicate that the thing in quotes is actually a quotation of informal speech. So it is quite reasonable to put a less ostentatious punctuation mark to say "Hey, this is a complete bastardisation of English, but this is what people are using."

    Personally, I think that "MP3 files" is clearer and less offensive to us grammar Nazis, but newspapers have to reflect real world usage.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
    1. Re:Actually, the NYT has a point. by argent · · Score: 1

      It is not even an acronym, since it has no discernible vowels and the "3" is clearly not a pronounceable letter

      Not all acronyms are pronouncable acronyms (eg TLD, TCP, PSTN, etc), and the use of a lowercase s to indicate pluralization of an acronym is common usage. "MP3S" might be pronounced "Em Pee Three Ess", but "MP3s" is "Empy-threes".

    2. Re:Actually, the NYT has a point. by cafebabe · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info. I guess my resistance to it comes from the fact that it looks very similar to an improper use of a posessive. "MP3's" and "SUV's" might be correct but it looks too much like the grammatically incorrect "Fresh Fish's For Sale" sign at my grocer or the "Clean Lint Out Of Dryer's After Use" sign at my laundry.

      --
      When violence rules the world outside / And the headlines make me want to cry / It's not the time to just keep quiet
    3. Re:Actually, the NYT has a point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mind your p's and q's.

      This has always been an accepted orthography.

  147. Tony Snow Job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Tony Long is Wired News' copy chief. His previous atrocity against the cult of technology was inserting a hyphen in "e-mail."

    Who the fsck does this guy think he is? He writes an article in October, 2000 declaring that e-mail is now officially (by him) designated 'e-mail'? Everyone I know of has always referred to electronic mail as 'e-mail'.

    Also, the OP here claims that Tony Snow eliminated the hyphen in e-mail. In fact, it's just the opposite. He claims that he added it.

    "Sharp-eyed readers of our service, particularly those who have been with us for awhile, will notice some stylistic changes beginning with today's post.

    Foremost among them is the insertion of the hyphen into "e-mail."

  148. alt by jago25_98 · · Score: 1

    interwob
    pornpipe
    world wide time sink
    lazy library

  149. Re:Those are i(I?)ntranets........genius.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    "Intranet" is meaningless marketspeak which usually applies to a Web site.

    The technical term "internet" applies to a collection of "networked networks".

    Genius.

  150. Official American Regions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The regions are the East, the Midwest, the West, the South, and Texas.

    1. Re:Official American Regions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot Canada.

  151. WRONG! Link to CNN transcript where Gore said it! by Luscious868 · · Score: 1
    A lot of people joke around about this, but the truth of the matter is that he never claimed that he "invented it," only that he secured funding for it. This funding was instrumental in its creation. Really, this whole joke is just another example of a witty Republican smear that has no basis in fact.

    So, it's all just part of some right wing smear campaingn huh? Wrong! Al Gore appeared on CNN's Late Edition with Wolf Blitzer on March 9, 1999 and had the following exchange with Wolf Blitzer:

    BLITZER: I want to get to some of the substance of domestic and international issues in a minute, but let's just wrap up a little bit of the politics right now.

    Why should Democrats, looking at the Democratic nomination process, support you instead of Bill Bradley, a friend of yours, a former colleague in the Senate? What do you have to bring to this that he doesn't necessarily bring to this process?

    GORE: Well, I will be offering -- I'll be offering my vision when my campaign begins. And it will be comprehensive and sweeping. And I hope that it will be compelling enough to draw people toward it. I feel that it will be.

    But it will emerge from my dialogue with the American people. I've traveled to every part of this country during the last six years. During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet. I took the initiative in moving forward a whole range of initiatives that have proven to be important to our country's economic growth and environmental protection, improvements in our educational system.

    If you don't believe me, here's a link to the transcript so you can read it for yourself.

  152. Okay then! by gotr00t · · Score: 1
    Change your bookmarks to ww.slashdot.org and guess what? IT STILL WORKS!

    It looks like the ppl over at /. took your suggestion, just a few minutes after it was posted!

    1. Re:Okay then! by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      It appears that anything.slashdot.org will work. If the hostname part preceding slashdot.org coincides with a Slashdot section (science, apple, etc.) then the page is given a certain colour scheme, but the contents will not depend on it. In fact, I just tried fucking.retarted.slashdot.org and it gave me the usual front page, as logic dictates.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    2. Re:Okay then! by gotr00t · · Score: 1
      Heh, yes I realized that when I tried slashdot with the 2w subdomain. I meant it with sarcasm in my reply to the grandparent, as I knew that slashdot could not have possibly put a new subdomain just for the sake of one post.

      Thanks for pointing that out though.

  153. Not Just TCP/IP by Inhibit · · Score: 1

    Actually, I'd say that it handles many protocols. Any of them can be routed over the shared backbone that is the "Internet".

    I agree it should be cap'd though. As we're reffering to a single entity in the specific rather than a type of something in the generic. Tom rather than human and all that.

    They're probably having trouble just because it's a dual purpose name. Ex: the guy in Batman is called "The Joker". He is also "a joker", as in the character from the card.

    --
    You're reading Slashdot. Of course you like Linux and pc hardware
    1. Re:Not Just TCP/IP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IP, Internet Protocol is what you're looking for. TCP/IP = Transmission Control Protocol over Internet Protocol. Of course there are other "internet protocols" but the Internet obviously uses Internet Protocol. There are (or were?) other internets. I remember one called Fido net, but this may be a poor example.

  154. Some old suggestions from Reg readers by Rescate · · Score: 1
    From The Register, 9/21/2000, WWWhere there's a wonk there's a way
    • "vey vey vey" - said in Austrian accent
    • "triple-dub dot"
    • "w-cube"
    • "wubble-u"
    • "web dot"
    • "dub dub dub dot"
    • "wubba dot"
    • "wibble"
    • "trip-dub"
    • "dubya"
    • "we-three"
    • "wawawa"
    • "sextuple u" or just "sex u"
    • "wah wah wah"
    • "wuhwuhwuhdot"
    • "wubba wubba wubba"
    I also remember seeing "triple-dub" in an old Wired magazine in the Jargon Watch section. ...here it is from July 1995. It is very sad that I actually remembered that.
    1. Re:Some old suggestions from Reg readers by feargal · · Score: 1

      My favourite is wibbly wobbly wonder.

      --
      "A goldfish was his muse, eternally amused"
  155. Proper Nouns and such (was Re:Next move...) by Proteus · · Score: 4, Insightful
    There are scores of unique things which don't have their names capitalized. The earth. The sun. The internet is now one of those things. Initially, it was named the Internet because it wasn't unique. "Internet" was only capitalized in order to differentiate it from other large internetworks of computers back in the early days.
    Your very argument is flawed. The Earth should be capitalized, but "earth" may not be. Likewise with the Sun. If you refer to it as the name of the specific object (I live on Earth), it gets capitalized. Otherwise, (I enjoy having fresh earth between my fingers) it may not be.

    Capitalization of proper nouns exists to increase comprehension. The Internet was named that way because it was unique. There were, agreed, many inter-networks, but the Internet was the "mother of all internets" as it aimed to connect them all into one global inter-network.

    Corporations have intranets, but they may also have inter-networks with various vendors and customers -- these may not always be part of the Internet. So, as long as it is possible to have an internet that is not the Internet, the proper version should be capitalized.

    Wired is merely hoping to be ahead of the curve in suggesting that it won't be long before all internets are part of the Internet -- and then it won't matter if the term is capitalized at all.
    --
    We may not imagine how our lives could be more frustrating and complex—but Congress can. – Cullen Hightower
    1. Re:Proper Nouns and such (was Re:Next move...) by EvanED · · Score: 4, Funny

      Otherwise, (I enjoy having fresh earth between my fingers) it may not be

      Unless you're Atlas, and are actually holding Earth between your fingers.

      Um, you insensitive clod.

    2. Re:Proper Nouns and such (was Re:Next move...) by TechnoPops · · Score: 1

      Yes, key word there being "should." It's sort of like how you should really say "isn't" instead of "ain't," but people still say "ain't" anyway.

      --
      "Each time you smile, it'll only last awhile. Life may be scary, but it's only temporary."
    3. Re:Proper Nouns and such (was Re:Next move...) by gregmac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Corporations have intranets, but they may also have inter-networks with various vendors and customers -- these may not always be part of the Internet. So, as long as it is possible to have an internet that is not the Internet, the proper version should be capitalized.

      I believe the proper 90's buzzword for these inter-networks is "extranet". So really, you can have an extranet that is not part of the internet, but there is only one internet, and the internet is really an extranet.

      Now if you can excuse me, I need to go think outside the box and shift some paradigms to enhance my time utilization.

      --
      Speak before you think
    4. Re:Proper Nouns and such (was Re:Next move...) by parksie · · Score: 1

      Um, you insensitive clod.

      Perfect considering the context!

  156. RONG RONG RONG!!!!!11!!! by cgreuter · · Score: 1

    At least, their decapitalizaton of Internet is. I can see the word "web" making sense as a lowercase word, but not Internet.

    An internet (lower-case "i") is any computer network which connects several networks together. I.e., an "inter network". For example, if I disconnected the DSL line at home and then ran an Ethernet cable from my router to the neighbours', I'd have my own internet.

    The Internet that we all know and love and use to download pr0n is the name of one such specific internet. Thus, we need the capitalization to distinguish between an internet and The Internet.

    I think Wired just heard the old saw about the capitalists being the first against the wall and got confused.

  157. Happened in Denmark already by Frodo420024 · · Score: 1

    I'm working for a Danish computer magazine (Komputer for alle), and am somewhat annoyed by this having happened already. But it's official, it's internet, not Internet etc.

    --
    I'm in a Unix state of mind.
  158. terminilogy error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    Not all acronyms are pronouncable
    Yes, they are, by definition.

    eg TLD, TCP, PSTN, etc
    Those are not acronyms. They are initialisms.

  159. In Sweden... by tewmten · · Score: 0

    .. we call it teh Interweb!!!

  160. But... by swordfish666 · · Score: 1

    ...Porn will still be capitalized....

    --
    I like-a do-the cha-cha.
  161. Always by faqmaster · · Score: 1

    It has always been just the "internet."

    The internet is to the 90's what rock-n-roll was to the 60's. Both were co-opted by money and power and left a bunch of kids bitter.

    No, the internet didn't bring down tyrannies and usher in a wave of democracy and human rights over the world; your acid-fueled all-night air-guitar jam session at the Grateful Dead show didn't free Tibet either. Go figure. One thing Chairman Mao was right about is that political power comes from the barrel of a gun. You'll have to get off your ass and do something that involves substantial personal risk to you and your loved-ones in order to change things substantially.

    --
    Are you...Are you some kind of genius?
    No, ma'am, I'm just a regular Slashdot reader.
  162. How uninteresting by joerg · · Score: 0, Troll

    Someone posted a story on Slashdot about some magazine's decicion to spell a few words a little bit different in the future. Anyone interested?

  163. How's that for by oO+Peeping+Tom+Oo · · Score: 3, Funny

    Capital Punishment?

  164. It'll always be Caps for me by Celt · · Score: 1

    It'll always be
    Internet, Net, Web & E-Mail
    for me, just don't look right when you type email

    --
    "WebTV: bringing the Internet into the shallow end of the gene pool since 1995" - Martin Bishop
  165. Bah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are just making an excuse so that ink can be saved in printing. 'i' vs 'I' less ink.

  166. Wired staff should be ashamed by MrDiablerie · · Score: 1

    I think we should all send them feedback about that story.
    Do they honestly think they can create new rules for the English language? I'm supposed to called the Web the "web" now? What's to differentiate that from a spider web? Idiotic.

    1. Re:Wired staff should be ashamed by angrykeyboarder · · Score: 1

      Who says they are creating new rules? The internet is not a product, business or person. Therefore, why should internet be capitalized? I've never been one to capitalize it and am often "corrected" by software spell-checkers. I'm glad to know I've been vindicated! :-)

      --
      Scott

      ©20014 angrykeyboarder & Elmer Fudd. All Wights Wesewved
  167. Re:WRONG! Link to CNN transcript where Gore said i by Shadowin · · Score: 1

    Reading what you posted puts into context what Gore said, and proves that the Right exaggerated and even lied.

    The last time I looked, it is unethical to take quotes out of context or to replace a persons words.

  168. e.g., i.e. by chefmonkey · · Score: 2, Funny
    Ray "Bones" Barboni: Let me explain something to you. Momo is dead. Which means everything he had now belongs to Jimmy Cap, including you. Which also means, when I speak, I speak for Jimmy. E.g., from now on, you start showing me the proper fuckin' respect.

    Chili Palmer: "E.g." means "for example". What I think you want to use is "i.e.".

    Ray "Bones" Barboni: Bullshit! That's short for "ergo".

    Chili Palmer: Ask your man.

    Bodyguard: To the best of my knowledge, "e.g." means "for example".

    Ray "Bones" Barboni: E.g., i.e., fuck you! The point is this: When I say "jump", you say "OK", okay?

  169. Oh For Jebus Sakes!!! by kenp2002 · · Score: 1

    Next thing you know they'll start using words lik emails. WTF people do you go to your mail box and get your mails? You've got mail, not "You've Got Mails" Has the entire world gone retarded!?!? How many people even remember how to spell OK? Hmm?

    OKAY!

    Not that I am some grammar master myself and I still catch myself using emails from time to time but for god sakes why not just use Dumbonics in all the articles. Better yet leet speak the whole damn thing. Try this:

    |3!77 Gh8$ 4|\||) $3|\|4t0r |33ry \/\/!77 |)3p}{34t t3}{ t3rr0r!$ts |3y |34|!n' |)3|\/| P!3z!!!!

    --
    -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
  170. BTW by kenp2002 · · Score: 1

    For the youngsters that didn't spend there lives at one end of a Renegade or Wildcat BBS across a 9600 modem that would be:

    "Bill Gates and Senator Kelly will defeat the terrorists by bakin' dem pies"

    --
    -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
  171. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is teh orginial funneh!!!1!11~1~eleventy-million

    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP by trentblase · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Mr. Bush, is that you??

  172. Re:Those are i(I?)ntranets........genius.. by cheese_wallet · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Intranet" is meaningless marketspeak which usually applies to a Web site.

    The technical term "internet" applies to a collection of "networked networks".

    Genius.


    Apparently you haven't made it into the real world yet. Intra means within. Inter means between. You have interstate roads (crossing boundaries) and intrastate roads (stay within the state). A corporations network that is not open to the public is an intranet. It is used only within (intra) the company.

    intranet is most certainly not meaningless marketspeak.

  173. And the written word takes another one to the chin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just another example of how people only pay attention to the rules of language when it suits them. The "Internet" refers to the global network of unique interconnected IP networks. With the lower-case "internet," the meaning shifts to any network of unique interconnected IP networks. What happens the next time Wired has to have an article explaining how some multinational's internet connects to the Internet? With the global "Internet" not capitalized, the sentence loses all meaning.

    As for "e-mail," it is quite simple. There is no contention that it is not a compound word made up of "electronic" and "mail." And as with any compound word, it needs a hyphen to separate them. Thus "e-mail."

    People often complain how inconsistent the English language is in spelling and pronounciation. Most of the exceptions that drive people crazy are the result of decisions just like the one Wired made. While, unlike the French, there is no central voice of authority on what is and is not proper English, the accepted rules of the language are broken at our own peril.

  174. What about Ethernet? by VTdude · · Score: 1

    Can we start using ethernet? We've done more lowercasing to laser and radar.

  175. Liar by FreeUser · · Score: 1



    A lie is a lie, and you just told one.

    Gore led the charge on getting the Internet funded. This seed capital was instrumental in its creation, and he rightly took credit for his significant role in its creation. He never claimed to have invented it, and claims to the contrary (originating from Declan McCullagh, the same guy who smeared the LiViD - "Linux DVD" project - and painted them out to be a bunch of DVD pirates, which got the MPAA interested and forced several developers to drop the project or face litigious reprisals) have been thoroughly debunked by a number of folks who did in fact take part in inventing the Internet, and have in fact spoken up on Al Gore's behalf.

    It is Republican smear pure and simple, and has about as much basis in fact as Baby Bush's Weapons of Mass Destruction excuse for invading Iraq in a misguided effort to undue Daddy's defeat, ie none whatsoever.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  176. ARPANET.. by Sophrosyne · · Score: 1

    I officially declare that ARPANET shall only be referred to as aRPAnET... bow down before the mystical powers of WIRED magazine!!!

  177. what gives them the right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shouldn't it be Al Gore's choice?

    It must be a slow news day, so they had to invent their own news.

  178. in other news. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /. will now be referred to as ?> from this point on

  179. Denmark has already switched by olau · · Score: 1

    In Denmark, "internet" is supposed to be spelled with a small "i" and has been so for some time now (since 1999, I think). The proof is here.

    Lots of people I meet in the Department of Computer Science don't know this so I've been miscorrected on several occasions. Even once at an exam where the external examiner gave us a knee-jerk reaction like the ones found in most comments here. Of course, I then pointed out that his reaction was outdated and did not correspond to the official Danish spelling. Luckily, it didn't seem to have any influence on the grades. :-)

    There are lots of redundant, silly posts here. The Danish authorities had good reasons for not capitalising the internet - as opposed to most people here, they are actually language expert (natural language, that is) who have studied these issues for years at a university. I think the primary reason was that the internet is becoming much like the telephone network or the road network, which you don't capitalise either. Yes, I know about Tanenbaum's explanation, but Tanenbaum is a computer scientist, not a linguist.

    1. Re:Denmark has already switched by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Riiiiiiiight. I don't speak freaky-deaky Dutch...

  180. Already happened by janaagaard · · Score: 1

    Next move...
    ... we should decapitalize "Google".


    The post was moderated as funny, but I find it quite insightful. And in a way that has already happened, since google is spelled with a lower case g, when it is used as a verb.

  181. Yes, by sad_ · · Score: 1

    because 'God' also starts with a capital. and i don't even believe in any god, the Internet is more like a religion to me :P

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  182. Proper nouns are capitalized. by SKorvus · · Score: 1

    There is the Pacific Ocean, Atlantic Ocean, Indian Ocean... there are several oceans, which are proper names and thus capitalized when referred to.

    There is one Earth, but many earthquakes.

    There is one Internet; it is the "network of networks". One doesn't have "an internet", "some internets", but "the Internet". One might, however, have "an internet appliance", or "my internet training".

    Proper nouns are capitalized. Taj Mahal. America. Roman Empire. Common Era.

    --
    Live simply, that others may simply live. -Gandhi
    1. Re:Proper nouns are capitalized. by pclminion · · Score: 1
      Proper nouns are capitalized. Taj Mahal. America. Roman Empire. Common Era.

      Yes yes, and all TPS reports must have coversheets.

    2. Re:Proper nouns are capitalized. by feargal · · Score: 1

      Ah, just watched that a few weeks ago, it's amazing how many references of it I've noticed since. Has it been re-released in the US or something?

      --
      "A goldfish was his muse, eternally amused"
  183. Re:WRONG! Link to CNN transcript where Gore said i by IshanCaspian · · Score: 1

    From the DHS web site:

    "President Bush created the USA Freedom Corps in an effort to capture those opportunities and foster an American culture of service, citizenship and responsibility."

    http://www.dhs.gov/dhspublic/display?theme=63&co nt ent=233

    So by your interpretation, the Dems can claim that George Bush actually created these people in some kind of laboratory?

    Of course not. So why does everyone try to imply that Al Gore was taking credit for inventing the underlying technology that runs the web?

    --

    But there is another kind of evil that we must fear most... and that is the indifference of good men.
  184. There is one Internet by billsf · · Score: 1

    There is also "one phone", over time the novelty of even the biggest, most complex machine (the thrust to develop Unix) ever built by mankind becomes commonplace and loses it proper name.

    Allot of people have and carry a 'phone'. I can just see the day when people refer to their $250 terminal as an 'internet'. What next, a 'unix'?

  185. The Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Internet happens to be the collectively agreed on proper name of the worlds largest internet. A type of network. This is a bit like naming a collective bargaining agreement The Collective Bargaining Agreement.

    Or perhaps more like calling the caucasian race "The Race" it's not the only race, even though it's name would imply so. I myself us an alternate race every day.... and an alternate internet every once an while too.

  186. Clearly... by Catullus · · Score: 1

    ...that place is just owned by someone whose parents were very cruel to them :)

  187. Wrong to capitalize. by Ace905 · · Score: 1

    I haven't been over my grammatical rules since Grade 1 (1986) -- but don't you capitalize all Noun's in a sentence. Person, Place, or Thing.

    Is this a Canadian specific rule?

    Not that the "Internet" should be capitalized, but -- the article explains, "Why? The simple answer is because there is no earthly reason to capitalize any of these words. Actually, there never was."

    I'm confused.

    --

    Ace
  188. I design network cards by Phleg · · Score: 1

    ...so I use MACs all the time. What are you talking about?

    --
    No comment.
  189. I don't understand why we should... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't understand why we should focus on the proper capitalization of the word "internet" when we could be spending our time trying to help get Dick Cheney some more money. Cheney is running low and he needs our support. Please send a check for as much money as you can made out to "Halliburton Inc". Think technology, people, think technology.

  190. Give it proper repect by jacoby · · Score: 1

    I've always preferred to call it shub-internet. I sacrifice my bits to it daily.

  191. C?c alorie by neotuli · · Score: 1

    This article brings to mind a sort of question that has been bugging me for quite a while. My biology teacher explained that, in the US, Calorie (capital C) is actually a kilo-calorie, while a calorie (little c) is just one calorie. Now what happens if I want to use calorie (reffering to just one..not 1000) at the beginning of a sentence?
    Do I capitalize it?..no..that would make it 1000 calories.
    Do I leave it uncapitalized? No..that would break grammar rules..

    It just doesnt make any sense!

  192. response to Wired by Morthaur · · Score: 1

    The following is the response that I have submitted to the Wired author in question (Tony Long).

    Dear Sir,

    I have no idea from whence you derive the rationale for your decision; the argument seems specious and illogical. The last time I checked, proper nouns such as the names of persons or companies were capitalised in English, and not just auf Deutsch.

    The word 'Web' is an abbreviation of 'World Wide Web', which is just as much a proper noun as 'The New York Times' or Wired News'. It is also represented by an actual administrative body, the World Wide Web Consortium.

    'Internet' is likewise a proper noun, and as 'Net' is simply an abbreviated rendering, it deserves the retention of the capital. Were it not for the existence of such regulatory bodies as the Internet Engineering Task Force, your argument might have some validity.

    Further, your contention that the Internet is simply a new means of communication ignores the fact that it is regulated by a handful global organisations, unlike your other examples (radio, television, etceteras). Further, you may note that in cases where other media are addressed properly, capitals are, in fact, used; e.g., the spelling of Radio 1 (the BBC station).

    To use another argument, examine the name of your own organisation. The term 'wired' has entered the English language as a verb indicating an electrical or digital connexion. It is frequently used in reference to the Internet. Should, then, the name of your own company be referred to as 'wired news' since the word has such a generalised connotation within the context in which you operate?

    In a similar vein, the orthographical and etymological spellings for the following words should be retained: 'e-mail', 'on-line', and 'log-in'/'log-on'. Arguments based upon the ubiquity of incorrect spelling have no legitimacy as far as I am concerned. Would you have us all adopting the spellings 'thru', 'nite', and 'donut'?

    Regards,
    #########

    --

    +++++++
    "Look, dear, it's a crazy hairy scary man!"
  193. Bringing in the Grammatical Fourth Reich by SubliminalLove · · Score: 1

    "You have two cat's...what? Two cat's ears?")

    I hate to be a stickler, but there's nothing you could put after "two cat's" that would make sense. Posessive plural gets the apostrophe after the "s".

    So you have two cats'... pajamas, perhaps?

    Benjamin

    1. Re:Bringing in the Grammatical Fourth Reich by Zcipher · · Score: 1

      I hate to be a stickler, but there's nothing you could put after "two cat's" that would make sense. Posessive plural gets the apostrophe after the "s".

      So you have two cats'... pajamas, perhaps?

      Hmm . . . IANAGN, but that would read to me like "I have the ears of two cats" rather than "I have two ears of a cat." It reads as though the number of animals is plural rather than the number of ears, which I assume to have been the original intent.

      In retrospect, I suppose IAAGN.

  194. Correction, maybe too late. by mledford · · Score: 1

    "Foremost among them is the insertion of the hyphen into "e-mail." It's a decision -- made for both practical and symbolic reasons -- that has ruffled some feathers around here, and will no doubt ruffle a few out there. But more on that later. First, let's consider the justification for upsetting the ritual tranquility of your morning latté."

    Correction for the poster. Unless Wired reversed their decision... they decided to INSERT the hyphen not take it away. Second, Internet should always be capitalized when referencing the Internet. Since it is a proper noun. But then again I'm horrible at English grammer...

    What do I know anyway?

  195. 'Insecure' in the OED by sdowney · · Score: 1

    The OED lists insecure in the sense of 'Unsafe, exposed to danger' with references going back to 1654.

  196. wired news please read by nwbvt · · Score: 1

    Exactly. If they had just checked the dictionary before trying to redefine words on their own they would know that the words internet and Internet are not the same.

    --
    Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
  197. YOU ARE AN IGNORAMUS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  198. This change is moronic! by cmacb · · Score: 1

    Please write them and complain... I did:

    I'll agree with most Slashdot posters on this. Your thinking is muddled:

    "(Web will continue to be capitalized when part of the more official entity, World Wide Web.)"

    followed by:

    "But in the case of internet, web and net, a change in our house style was necessary to put into perspective what the internet is: another medium for delivering and receiving information. That it transformed human communication is beyond dispute. But no more so than moveable type did in its day. Or the radio. Or television."

    If "World Wide Web" deserves capitalization, then it is almost a tautology that "The Internet" does, since in fact the former is nothing more than a colloquialism of the later. It would have been much more correct for you to say you are never going to use the term "World Wide Web" at all, and instead standardize on "The Internet" (or just "Internet") as do people who know what they are talking about.

    Note the distinction between "Internet", that single network based on TCP/IP and related protocols allowing everyone in the world to be connected, and "intranet", or "internet" meaning any network set up using those protocols that allow one or more computers to communicate. The difference is significant.

    Your examples show your ignorance. "television" or "radio" can refer to many things. A device, and entertainment industry, a form of broadcast spectrum, or a cable signal. Those words would be more comparable to "network", "networking" which I agree should not be capitalized.

    Your move, carried to its logical conclusion would mean that the name of your publication should be changed to just "wired" since that word means "connected up with a wire". See the difference now?

  199. The internet is no longer the Internet by crashnbur · · Score: 1

    The internet is no longer the Internet, but a few million networks that were once based on what would require the proper name. The Internet was created 10-15 years ago. The internet is what we have today.

  200. This is stupid. by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 1

    Until there is more than one, and you can have a group of internets (weird to even say), there will be only one Internet. I don't give a damn how ubiquitous it is. There's only one White House, but using this same logic, we should now call it simply the white house.

    Morons.

    1. Re:This is stupid. by jlanthripp · · Score: 1
      Until there is more than one, and you can have a group of internets (weird to even say), there will be only one Internet
      Actually, there are many internets. The Internet, however, is the largest of them, and indeed consists mainly of smaller, connected internets.
      There's only one White House, but using this same logic, we should now call it simply the white house.
      But...but...there's a white house right across the street from me! And another just down the road! There's definitely more than one. Agreed, however; we shouldn't be calling the one currently occupied by the former governor of Texas "the white house" any more than we should be calling the global, public internet "the internet"
      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, & Firearms" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
  201. "The" InterNet by metalligoth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    On a similar vein, do you remember when these networks weren't referred to as "the" first?

    FidoNet was FidoNet, ARPANET was ARPANET, and InterNet was InterNet, and not "The Internet".

    I was aghast the first time I heard Dan Rather on the news describing "The Internet" in 1994. I was thinking, "News corespondent! Improper English!! Ahhhh!!!".

    Does anyone else notice that Martin Sergeant from TechTV still calls it by it's proper name, "InterNet", and not "The Internet"?

  202. Basic rules of grammar by nwbvt · · Score: 1
    http://webster.commnet.edu/grammar/capitals.htm/
    "Capitalize this....
    -Proper nouns
    --* Specific persons and things: George W. Bush, the White House, General Motors Corporation..."

    The Internet (as opposed to an internet, which refers to any interconnected group of networks) is a specific internet, thus it is a proper noun, thus it must be capitalized.

    Wired isn't considered an authority on grammar for a a reason. But they are just furthering a stereotype that geeks cannot use the English language properly.

    --
    Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
  203. If wired says so, Internet it is... by feargal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Most of the time, I try to be exacting about spelling and grammar. I fully spell words in text messages, and I punctuate where appropriate.

    At the same time, I am quite accepting about the way other people use the language and don't point out errors if the author's intent is still clear.

    I do have some pet hates when it comes to grammar, such as incorrect usage of "begs the question", or overusage of the word "get". Until now, the "internet" has not been on that list.

    However, if Wired has succumbed to the commercial world to the extent that it believes only trademarks and brandnames are truly deserving the consideration of the shift key, then let the battle lines be drawn!

    "True believers are fond of capitalizing words, whether they be marketers or political junkies or, in this case, techies. If It's Capitalized, It Must Be Important."

    This is the basis of their argument? Some idiots who misuse capital letters also inadvertently spell Internet correctly: therefore we should intentionally misspell it ourselves in order to disassociate ourselves from them.

    What complete and utter bollocks. Bollix, if you prefer. While I can understand Wired wanting to distance themselves from marketing and political people, they have no need to do so with techies - their articles do that all by themselves.

    Are the editors in Wired really that contemptuous?

    That they claim there was never any reason to capitalise it in the first place reflects their disregard for the heritage of the Internet. That they view it as "just another medium for delivering and receiving information" overlooks the armies of network engineers, and the tonnes of switches, routers, and cabling required to keep the Internet alive. If we unplugged all the routers, there would be no Internet. I'm pretty sure there would still be an internet or two though.

    Perhaps because you cannot catch a bus to the Internet you hesitate to use the shift key. I, however, have definately stubbed my toe on a portion of it before, and that for me is reason enough to capitalise it.

    Slightly unrelated, I usually write "Thank god", except when I want to remind the Christians that there may be more than one.

    Hmm. Theology meets regexp(3)... think its time for a new sig... (God)?|(god)*|(god)+

    --
    "A goldfish was his muse, eternally amused"
  204. Some story, sheesh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sci-fi writers have been doing this for years. Wired was behind the times.

  205. Dummies and the mods who love them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's like the ocean. The ocean is big, powerful, and impressive, and we owe our existence to it, but even still, we don't call it the Ocean, merely the ocean.

    What "the ocean" are you talking about? You mean the disparate bodies of water which taken together are not considered an ocean but oceans? Oh, I see, you really meant the Pacific Ocean. Or was that the Indian Ocean, or the Atlantic Ocean . . . .

  206. Maritz Travel Corp. by fishbowl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Around 1989, I noticed the Maritz Travel rep at my office had all kinds of literature with "Internet (R)(TM)" printed on it. They were doing a huge marketing campaign for their network.

    Well I, being the geek, confronted the travel rep about this, asking how they can possibly claim a trademark for their network, when "internet" already was common usage for a public network.

    Stupid travel rep didn't have a clue what I was talking about, and letters to managers in that company went unanswered.

    I think there is a potential problem here. Maritz Travel could conceivably prevail in a trademark dispute over the word "Internet" applied to a computer network.

    Nobody cared in 1989, and I doubt anyone cares today. They won't care until someone wins a lawsuit over it, I suppose.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  207. WTF. by thewiz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Must be nice to have the time to worry about whether it should be the "I"nternet or the "i"nternet, "e-"mail or "e"mail. Don't people have "B"etter things to do with their lives?

    I "G"uess not.....

    --
    If "disco" means "I learn" in Latin, does "discothèque" mean "I learn technology"?
  208. Re:WRONG! Link to CNN transcript where Gore said i by Seanasy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Vinton Cerf (generally acknowledged as the father of the Internet):

    I am taking the liberty of sending to you both a brief summary of Al Gore's Internet involvement, prepared by Bob Kahn and me. As you know, there have been a seemingly unending series of jokes chiding the vice president for his assertion that he "took the initiative in creating the Internet."

    Bob and I believe that the vice president deserves significant credit for his early recognition of the importance of what has become the Internet.

    More here: http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue5_10/wiggins /
  209. Text was donated to /. by lisnews author (me) by tiltowait · · Score: 1
  210. They just missed a little detail...... by Ernesto+Alvarez · · Score: 2, Informative
    From the article

    Why? The simple answer is because there is no earthly reason to capitalize any of these words. Actually, there never was.

    Now, in Andrew Tanembaum's "Computer Networks, Third Edition" is an interesting part in chapter one that says:

    (...) A collection of interconnected networks is called an internetwork or just internet.

    (Here goes a paragraph explainin what a WAN is, snipped for brevity)

    To avoid confusion, please note that the word "internet" will always be used in this book in a generic sense. In contrastm the Internet (note uppercase I) means a specific worldwide internet that is widely used to connect universities, government offices (....)

    So there IS a reason to capitalize "Internet". Namely to indicate it is the internet we all know, instead of a minor internet somewhere else.

    These two terms are also defined in RFC-1983 (Internet users' glossary), as defined in Tanembaum's book, with that distinction especially indicated. Sure, RFC-1983 is marked as "Informational", but it's still a RFC, and it shows a valid reason for the capitalization.

    Clearly someone at Wired did not do the necesary research.
  211. Other uncapitalized proper nouns by Aidtopia · · Score: 1

    Mercury, Venus, earth, Mars... Uh oh.

    The moon and the sun are also (usually) rendered with lowercase letters. That always struck me as odd. Is Earth the name of the planet or not? Can a Mars probe dig into the earth of the red planet?

    Do sci-fi writers end up using names like Sol, Terra, and Luna just so they capitalize them consistently along with the names of the rest of the celestial bodies?

  212. here's what i do by louden+obscure · · Score: 1

    i rarely capitalize anything cept fer may be acronymns and the official two letter initials the post office uses for the fifty states. not even the first letter of the first word of a sentence get's capitalized by me. hardly defining living on the edge, but then i really don't care.

    --
    Serenity now, insanity later.
    1. Re:here's what i do by drdink · · Score: 1

      We call this being illiterate. Good work!

      --
      Beware, Nugget is watching... See?
  213. Now, I have another reason to hate editors. by j+h+woodyatt · · Score: 1

    I remember when I could use the plural form of the word and nobody would look at me funny.

    I have a presence on several internets, and it has always been convenient to be able to refer to the current internet I am working with as "the internet" and distinguish that from the public internet by using the traditional form of capitalizing the 'I' when we are talking about the public, global internet.

    If WIRED is successful in propagating this new convention, then I will have to start calling it The Globally Public Internet to distinguish it from all the other internets I use.

    I hate editors. They are a lot less useful most times than they are supposed to be.

    --
    jhw
  214. Not wrong at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Your problem is that you think people mean it in a generic sense. If I invented the refrigerator and built a huge one called the Regrigerator then it would be a proper noun. Yes, other people could build refrigerators but if you want to speak about the big one you say the Refrigerator. It's a name... that's the name they gave it more than twenty years ago. It just also happens to be a generic term for the kind of thing it is. Kind of like windows vs. Windows, john vs. John apple vs. Apple. They mean different things -- the capital letter is there for a reason.

  215. Re:Next move...one word by baerm · · Score: 1

    One word...


    The internet was never a brand name, thus, there was no need to capitalize it.


    English

  216. microsoft by kaleco · · Score: 4, Funny

    They were going to decapitalise 'Microsoft', but in the end capitalism was just too much a part of their image.

    --
    Prosperity is only an instrument to be used, not a deity to be worshipped. Calvin Coolidge
  217. Finally! by jonadab · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What next, will they also stop capitalizing "usenet" and "web browser" and
    "service provider" and "post office" and "bank" and "grep" and "sort"?

    If internet were a proper noun, there would be other worldwide communications
    networks with other names. (No, don't say the phone network; phones and
    web browsers transmit their data over the *same* network, they just do it
    rather differently.) TCP/IP over avian carriers never really caught on,
    for some strange reason, so we only have one internet. But if we had did
    have two distinct internetworks, they'd both be internets.

    usenet is an edge case -- it really probably ought to be a proper noun, but
    it comes out of Unix culture, so it's lowercase as a matter of case-sensitive
    spelling, even at the beginning of a sentence, like grep and sort (when sort
    is used as a proper noun -- when sort is used as a verb or a common noun it's
    from standard English and is capitalized according to the normal rules).

    And yes, this is consistent with the normal rules of English, in the sense
    that the normal rules of English allow for exceptions based on sepcial rules
    pertaining to a given etymological source. There are also many English
    words that are CamelCased -- and I don't just mean computer words, either --
    because of their etymology or the particulars of the field they come from.
    Similarly, words derived from foreign languages often form their plurals
    specially or are pronounced specially according to the rules of the source
    language or field, e.g., pianos and filet, respectively. case-sensitive
    spellings from Unix culture are consistent with this.

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  218. Obligatory Simpson's Quote by I'm+on+lunch · · Score: 1

    "I'm really enjoying this so-called...iced cream"
    -- Mr. Burns

    1. Re:Obligatory Simpson's Quote by Jeff85 · · Score: 1

      Looks like in the beginning they didn't capitalize the internet, either. From SNPP.com: Carl: Hey, you know what I'm looking forward to? The future. Have you heard about this internet thing? Lenny: Internet? Carl: Yeah, it's the internetting they invented to line swim trunks. [holds up a pair of trunks caresses his face lining] It provides a comforting snugness. [a whistle sounds in the distance]

      --
      Fetch Text URL - Firefox Extension
  219. The internet is more than the Internet by danila · · Score: 1

    The Internet is a network we all love, but the internet is the network, plus the culture, plus the companies, plus the traditions, plus the lifestyle, etc., etc.

    So when talking about the network, we should capitalize: "DNS system is the cornerstone of the Internet". When talking about everything else, we shouldn't: "Kids on the internet have lousy spelling."

    --
    Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  220. Fresh Fish's For Sale by Nurgled · · Score: 1

    Maybe your grocer means "Fresh Fish is For Sale"! ;)

  221. MODS: RD_SYRINGE IS BONCH/OVERLY CRITICAL GUY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  222. wired Internet by coyotedata · · Score: 0

    Is that wired's great story of 2004???

  223. offtopic, sorta by JamesTRexx · · Score: 1

    You don't say "The Refrigerator is broken and the Food is bad, so let's jump in the Car and go to the Restaurant" do you?

    I do, after throwing all the spoiled stuff out and phoning the insurance company.

    --
    home
  224. Let's shoot people instead by Secret+Chimp · · Score: 1

    How about we introduce a shotgun to the next doofus that uses the phrase "information superhighway"? Nah, bad idea... we'd run out of politicians way too fast.

  225. Insecure vs. Non-secure by Sinner · · Score: 1

    It was the US Navy that got it wrong. Non-secure isn't a word. If a line is not protected from evesdropping, the correct term would be "unsecured".

    --
    fish and pipes
    1. Re:Insecure vs. Non-secure by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      Or, did the US Navy commence a new word usage/useage? I am guessing if it intentionally started from the DOD or CNO (Chief of Naval Operations) or even the TYCOM (Type Commander) or anywere heavy in the chain of command it was probably to differentiate the normal usage so that greater importance (or fear) would be conferred.

      If it began because some captain's yeoman had a poor or below-standard grasp of english/English usage/useage, then a bunch of officers on one ship or a shore station thus failed to catch it, and more tellingly, like a virus, the use propagated until it was just part of the culture (sic/pun?).

      I think I'll revisit the Dictionary of Naval Terms
      and reminisce...

      David Syes

      ======
      "Linux and Open Source form a healthy part of your computing and personal rights diet -- it includes openness, freedom, flexibility, access, rights to source code, cost reductions, code accountability, code security, nation-building, playing-field-leveling (allowing developing nations to QUICKLY catch up to so-called "super powers (aka SUPER-IP-HOOVERS)), secrecy-breaking, and is not beholden to any one corrupt, deviant, pecuniary, or malfeasant corporation, such as the likes of one (infamous) IP omnivore located in the upper west North American continent, south of a nation named Canada, in a political boundary state named Washington, reportedly named after a "liberating general" who at the time British did/could/would have labeled a terrorist--by today's standards..." (hmmm, too much STTNG "The High Ground

      http://sttng.epguides.info/?ID=234
      )"

      =======

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  226. Don Knuth on "email" vs. "e-mail" by AllTheGoodNamesWereT · · Score: 1
    Here's what Don Knuth had to say on the subject a number of years ago:
    A note on email versus e-mail

    Newly coined nonce words of English are often spelled with a hyphen, but the hyphen disappears when the words become widely used. For example, people used to write ``non-zero'' and ``soft-ware'' instead of ``nonzero'' and ``software''; the same trend has occurred for hundreds of other words. Thus it's high time for everybody to stop using the archaic spelling ``e-mail''. Think of how many keystrokes you will save in your lifetime if you stop now! The form ``email'' has been well established in England for several years, so I am amazed to see Americans being overly conservative in this regard. (Of course, ``email'' has been a familiar word in France, Germany, and the Netherlands much longer than in England --- but for an entirely different reason.)
  227. Standford University Network by Riktov · · Score: 1

    (this post intentionally left blank)

  228. An internet, the Internet by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

    According to Tanenbaum's book 'Computer Networks' the Internet is an example of an internet. An internet is a network linking together two smaller networks.

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  229. Do people actually believe this claptrap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While he may have contributed on a political level to its creation, that's not what he said

    Oh, but that was what he said! You quoted him yourself!

    During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet.

    He is clearly talking about his contributions in the capacity of a US senator, not as a network engineer. Anyone who intentionally misreads this statement to mean that Al Gore is claiming to have had a night job working on Internet infrastructure is being intellectually dishonest.

  230. What? by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 1

    Next, you're gonna tell us that you can verb a noun so long as it's a registered trademark.

    Well, you just verbed the noun "verb."

    So verb is a noun? Who would have noun...

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."