Slashdot Mirror


BBC Writer Tries PC Repair, Finds Poor Software

twitter writes "BBC author Paul Rubens tried out amateur computer repair and wrote about it. All of the software was for Windows, and he finds what most of us do: "Most of the problems I've been called to look at have been caused by viruses and spyware, some by strange software [conflicts], and only one by faulty hardware." He then flames the whole world of computer repairmen as 'a bunch of unqualified amateurs.'"

703 comments

  1. Close Call by fembots · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Luckily he wasn't trying out the amateur software development.

    If we went by his definition of unqualified amateurs, most OSS developers would have been in the same category, but look what these "unqualified amateurs" have done to OSS?

    1. Re:Close Call by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Seriously though, what can you expect from an article written by PeeWee Herman?

    2. Re:Close Call by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yeah, look what they've done: Created a nasty conglomerated mess of spaghetti dependancies, incompatibilities, and forking that would make even parallel universes envious.

    3. Re:Close Call by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      A little more than the average comment from an Anonymous Coward

      (this included ;)

    4. Re:Close Call by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is a result of short sightedness, not incompetence.

      Of course, these two things are not mutually exclusive.

    5. Re:Close Call by rpozz · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think there was an article quite a while ago where some asshole was claiming that OSS developers are "unqualified amateurs". Guess what? Many of the people who managed to write operating systems in assembler in a few K in the 80s were also "unqualified amateurs".

    6. Re:Close Call by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 1

      My grandfather became incompatible with his pants because of a forking spaghetti dependency. He forked himself right into a 45 waist until we got him to start watching his diet.

      Thank you, Dr. Atkins!

    7. Re:Close Call by fitten · · Score: 2, Insightful

      True... but I would argue that the quality of "unqualified amateurs" back then was much greater than "unqualified amateurs" of today. I mean, really, *anyone* can go out and buy a computer today. Back then, having a computer wasn't the norm. Only the *real* geeks had computers back then, not just every Tom, Dick, and Harry like today. Many/most of them were practically engineers (even if self-taught).

    8. Re:Close Call by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ooooh, I just loved it when software was "a few K"
      back when I started programming. I remember long
      angonizing over whether I wanted to economize on
      "cyles" or size. I really respected the art back
      in ~1980. Now I don't. I found my Intro Pascal
      book last week. It's 1/4" thick. I see suffering
      kids with a book about a foot thick on the bus and
      I point and laugh. I see software that doesn't
      tell you what it's for, and is so much bigger than
      what you TIHNK it's for, that I assume it's mostly
      for some evil secret agenda.

      The only consumer thing I've bought in the last
      couple of years is a "thumb drive", since I had
      special access to geek drinking buddies who could
      advise me on what works. The industry has not yet
      attempted to market to folks like the little old
      lady in Pasedena.

      Nils K. Hammer

    9. Re:Close Call by geekee · · Score: 1

      "If we went by his definition of unqualified amateurs, most OSS developers would have been in the same category, but look what these "unqualified amateurs" have done to OSS?"

      First, many OSS developers are paid, and even the ones that are not paid are not amateurs.

      --
      Vote for Pedro
    10. Re:Close Call by bonch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, most of them were people who studied/taught at universities or worked at places like HP, AT&T, etc. At the least, they had formal, academic training.

    11. Re:Close Call by khrtt · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've had to fix about 30 computers last year, and about 10 of them had problems caused by faulty power supplies and failing drives, both hard and optical. Power supplies are particularly nasty when they fail, since they often take other components with them. If you build your own box, rip out the supply that comes with your $40 case, and buy a good one.

      One box was stepped on, resulting in some connectors ripped out of the motherboard, and was partially fixed by soldering them back on.

      The rest of the machines were crippled by malware, which in 70% cases could not be removed automatically and had to be hunted down and exterminated by hand, leaving behind dead pieces of it n many cases. Only one machine had to be reinstalled (I'm sooo good!).

      On all those machines I hid IE from the menus and installed firefox, and explained to the users why they should use it. I've only had two repeat calls so far. Both users were web designers who had to have IE available for work, and also had random relatives and friends using their computers for mail, web and itunes. Can't help there:-).

    12. Re:Close Call by General+Fault · · Score: 1

      Duh... That is why the term "unqualified amateurs" is in quotes. Besides, who said that they were not paid?

      --
      No man is an island... But I wouldn't mind having a bigger moat.
    13. Re:Close Call by General+Fault · · Score: 1

      Hmmm. Looking at your Karma points, one would think that you and Amiga Trombone (592952) were up to something. Tell me if I'm wrong.... +1 for EVERY post. Seems a little unlikely.

      --
      No man is an island... But I wouldn't mind having a bigger moat.
    14. Re:Close Call by General+Fault · · Score: 1

      Oy, sorry. Scratch that. I just re-read the Karma FAQ. DOh!

      --
      No man is an island... But I wouldn't mind having a bigger moat.
    15. Re:Close Call by eraserewind · · Score: 1

      I disagree. "Home computers" were as, or more popular then than gaming consoles are today. Plenty of non-geeks had them. The only difference being you could program a home computer, and most people did, even if it was just something like:

      10 print "hello"
      20 goto 10

    16. Re:Close Call by iowannaski · · Score: 1
      rip out the supply that comes with your $40 case, and buy a good one.

      Do you have any reason to believe that the power supply that comes with a $40 case is more likely to fail than a more expensive one?

      If more expensive power supplies do fail less often, do you have any reason to believe the extra cost is justified by the failure rate difference?

      Your statement reads like, "Automobile accidents are the leading cause of death among 18-24 year olds, so buy an expensive car.

      --
      i forget
    17. Re:Close Call by SomeGuyFromCA · · Score: 1

      no, his statement reads like, "having a tire blowout at 85 on the freeway can kill you, so don't buy cheap tires."

      --
      if the answer isn't violence, neither is your silence / freedom of expression doesn't make it alright
    18. Re:Close Call by FLEB · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm not the OP, but...

      Do you have any reason to believe that the power supply that comes with a $40 case is more likely to fail than a more expensive one?

      Generally speaking, and in the reference of the author, the power supply coming with the $40 case is of a lower quality than a more expensive aftermarket model. Since the market for aftermarket power supplies consists mostly of technically-minded people, and there is little "glamour" or "brand" effect in the power-supply world, a more reliable power supply will tend to cost more, mostly on that basis.

      If more expensive power supplies do fail less often, do you have any reason to believe the extra cost is justified by the failure rate difference?

      Not to everyone, of course, just as "one size" rarely "fits all" in these arguments. But, for a person who values their data and hardware, the greater risk a catastrophic failure of an inadequate power supply would be disasterous (or at least inconvenient) enough to justify the greater initial investment.

      Your statement reads like, "Automobile accidents are the leading cause of death among 18-24 year olds, so buy an expensive car.

      I see it more as, "This car is cheap, but the engine starts on fire, totaling the car, if you work it too hard. Pay more for something more reliable."

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    19. Re:Close Call by FLEB · · Score: 1

      Come on... At least poke 53280 around some.

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    20. Re:Close Call by iowannaski · · Score: 1
      But, for a person who values their data and hardware, the greater risk a catastrophic failure of an inadequate power supply would be disasterous (or at least inconvenient) enough to justify the greater initial investment.

      That's one way to look at it. However, for those of us on a tight budget, the real question is, "Is this the most effective use of my $50?"

      a more reliable power supply will tend to cost more, mostly on that basis.

      While I accept that this is probably true, it's not what I asked. A more reliable power supply may cost more, but is a more expensive power supply necesarily more reliable?

      --
      i forget
    21. Re:Close Call by khrtt · · Score: 5, Informative

      Do you have any reason to believe that the power supply that comes with a $40 case is more likely to fail than a more expensive one?

      Yes. My sample included 10 computers with hardware failures, about a half of them with cheapo PSUs. 3 of the failures were due to a PSU blowing up, all 3 being of the the cheapo variety.

      One of the PSUs took the motherboard with it, and another took a hard drive full of data, and, by some strange fluke, a DIMM socket and a DIMM (the rest of the motherboard still works). This is not real statistics, mind you, but it gives you an idea.

      ==

      A typical failure mechanism is like this. Cheap PSUs can't make it through a brown-out. The H-bridge transistors have to pass higher current to compensate for the lower input voltage, and start to overheat. A good PSU would use heftier transistors, and the controller would shut it down if the voltage dips too low.

      In a lousy cheap PSU one of the FETs reaches the point where the silicon starts to melt, and it becomes permanently conductive. Then, the controller switches the bridge, causing a through current that melts the other FET in the same side of the bridge. One of the FETs then vapourizes with a loud bang, leaving a visible crack in the plastic case of the FET. During all this the current through the transformer gets switched chaotically, causing spikes in the secondary windings, and killing the cheap underrated regulators in the secondary circuits, which then pass the spikes to your expensive components. Something like that.

      Another problem with poorly built PSUs is that the irregularities in the input sometimes make it to the output, causing crashes and hang-ups. If you want to build a stable system, start with a high quality PSU. It doesn't have to be expensive. Just pick one from a company whose name you (or your friends) recognize.

    22. Re:Close Call by ChatHuant · · Score: 1

      Guess what? Many of the people who managed to write operating systems in assembler in a few K in the 80s were also "unqualified amateurs".

      Yes, that's what many of them were. Don't let yourself be unnecessarily impressed: an OS that fits in a few kb is really not such a big deal - and FWIW, I was one of those guys, having built my own Z80 computer and written the software for it (including keyboard, video, casette and floppy drivers, a nice monitor with a few debug capabilities and a small assembler). Being a professional programmer requires more than enthusiasm.

    23. Re:Close Call by Guido+von+Guido · · Score: 1

      How can you check for a cheap power supply?

    24. Re:Close Call by khrtt · · Score: 3, Informative

      How can you check for a cheap power supply?

      I can think of a few ways, but they all would be too involved unless you were about to order a 1000 PSUs for a production run.

      Cracking it open and looking at the quality of the PCB fabrication (lack of hand soldering) would be my #1. Hand-soldering usually means cold solder joints in some of the units.

      A DESTRUCTIVE test for brown-out response would be quite easy - just load the supply to the rated max, then lower the input voltage. The thing should shut down, and not blow up. Of course, this test would only be destructive to a supply that wasn't worth its name in the first place. Vary the speed with which you lower the voltage.

      Another test you could do would be to hook up a scope to the output, and look at how it responds to spikes/dips in the input. If there are any spikes at all, especially in the UP direction, it's no good.

      Now, IANA-electrical-engineer. Not all electrical engineers can properly design and test PSUs either, even though the PSU design is usually consireded a low-grade job that's given to an out-of-school junior EE as a "training" excercise. The truth is that you never get hailed a hero for designing a good PDU, yet designing one is quite involved.

    25. Re:Close Call by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Cheap power supplies are a gamble. Some of them are just fine - I've seen $20 specials go years with zero problems. I have also seen them cause all kinds of strange stability issues and fry components costing even more money. To me, it's just not worth the time or hassle to save as little as $50, it's cheaper and easier (in the long run) to buy a good power supply and be done with it. I guess it's a matter of how much your time is worth to you.

      Not to say that all expensive power supplies are good - but I haven't had any problems with the well known, big names out there like Antec.

      And your car analogy is flawed. Would you think an 18-24 year old is just as safe in a $500 clunker from the 80's than they would be in a newer, undoubtably more expensive car with airbags and ABS?

    26. Re:Close Call by kjots · · Score: 1

      The answer is "probably".

      Once you remove the name brands, price is a generally good indicator of quality in the I.T. industry.

    27. Re:Close Call by hazem · · Score: 1

      Almost...

      I agree with the first part of your analogy: "having a tire blowout at 85 on the freeway can kill you", the a better follow up (according to his advice) is, "so when you buy a new car, go out and replace the tires with expensive ones."

    28. Re:Close Call by SomeGuyFromCA · · Score: 1

      well, Car Analogies Don't Map Well To Computers. no one will sell you a car with crappy tires.

      otoh, people sell computers with crappy psus all the time (because hey, psus don't make big impressive 3.6 gHz for $300 price tags).

      --
      if the answer isn't violence, neither is your silence / freedom of expression doesn't make it alright
    29. Re:Close Call by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely 100% correct. The cheap power-supplies are the biggest cause of failure that I see as a network technician. Next, after that, comes hard drives. It's funny to see people buying PCs put together with high-end video cards, and these people are trying to save money, so they skimp on the power-supplies. It's better to skimp and buy a cheap mother-board than a cheap power-supply, IMO.

    30. Re:Close Call by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      noob

    31. Re:Close Call by masklinn · · Score: 1
      Do you have any reason to believe that the power supply that comes with a $40 case is more likely to fail than a more expensive one?
      Not that much, but there are some much more important things: high quality PSUs have a much better tension stability (you know, like your core CPU voltage staying where you set it, not yoyoing between 1.2V and 1.5V all the time), leading to a longer computer-components lifetime (the stabler [sp?] your tensions are, the less your components suffer, not even talking about overclocking here), are much more efficient (~$100 PSUs can get over 80% efficiency, or even 90% [check the recent Hiper PSUs], LQ ones are much much less efficient > eat more electricity to waste it as a heater), are often quieter and have better peak power (even if the power they're sold to fit is the same).

      Cheap PSUs are the bane of computers.
      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    32. Re:Close Call by rjshields · · Score: 1

      You must be new around here :)

      --
      In this world nothing is certain but death, taxes and flawed car analogies.
    33. Re:Close Call by FrankNFurter · · Score: 1

      Having had to replace several cheap power supplies which came with a 40 case (including my own...) I have to agree with him. El-Cheapo power supplies are very prone to fail after, for example, a power surge.

      --
      "Slashdot - the one place on the internet where guys brag about how small it is." - that IT girl
    34. Re:Close Call by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Based on what you say, does it mean that a cheapo PSU run from a UPS will be safe, as the UPS should regulate all the power into the PSU?

    35. Re:Close Call by khrtt · · Score: 1

      A good UPS, yes. There is the kind of UPS that always stabilizes the output, they are usually quite expensive. The more common kind of UPS only kicks in if the input fails. Depending on how fast it kicks in it could be useful in protecting your equipment, or not.

    36. Re:Close Call by fitten · · Score: 1

      The only difference being you could program a home computer, and most people did, even if it was just something like:

      Exactly. A little knowledge is a bad thing. These days, everyone with a console thinks they know all about computer architecture and computer programming when, at most, the most technical thing they've done is take the case off their XBox to mod it.

      For example, every day I see tons of people talking about how 1337 it is to overclock when they have no clue as to what really goes on inside the CPU. They think that the clock generator is just a gas pedal or something. These are the same people who complain that whatever OS is so unstable that it crashes on them 10 times a day. Also, these are the people that think that going to 64-bit will speed up everything they do by 2X because 64 = 2 * 32.

    37. Re:Close Call by rjune · · Score: 1

      Thank you. Your comment was moderated as informative and indeed it was. The secretary at my church called yesterday and told me she heard a loud pop and the computer was dead. This confirmed everything that I observed. Also, the computer has been out of warranty for about a month.

    38. Re:Close Call by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You made my day! :)

      Knowing those pokes and peeks -- for stuff that had easy commands in other home computers -- really made one feel quite 31337 back then...

    39. Re:Close Call by General+Fault · · Score: 1

      No, just forgetfull... and running on little sleep.

      --
      No man is an island... But I wouldn't mind having a bigger moat.
    40. Re:Close Call by Reziac · · Score: 1

      A couple years ago someone ran a whole bunch of quality tests on various PSUs, and found that there was a direct correlation between the physical weight of the PSU, and how good it was: heavier was better, across the board.

      This goes along with my own observation -- good PSUs are heavy, and they have *lots* of connectors with heavy-gauge wires. I've never seen one of that type die. However, I've seen plenty of wimpy-built models that died young (they just plain quit powering on, some after only a few days use), all light in weight, and with few and skinny-wired connectors.

      As to other bad effects, I've read that poor PSUs generate microspikes that cause mini-headcrashes, hence random bad spots on otherwise-healthy HDs; also that they can cause memory errors thus instability.

      Good PSUs are worth what you pay for 'em. Frex, the one in this box, quite expensive in its day, will be 11 years old in May, having served 24/7/365 most of those years, and it hasn't even been power-cycled in over 3 years. And nothing in this machine (now in its 3rd major incarnation) has ever failed, except for a 486 mainboard that was fried by a keyboard short, and a 5 yr old HD that died of a physical misadventure.

      However... not all good PSUs are expensive. Some PSUs in certain cheap generic cases (RaidMax, and one no-name that I liked from the AT era) are actually quite good, but in those examples, the rest of the chassis is nice too (heavy gauge metal with rolled edges, lots of drive bays) -- IOW their manufacturer does not indulge in corner-cutting.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    41. Re:Close Call by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I used to lose transformers (like for the ans.machine) regularly, to power spikes. I put them all on surge units, and haven't lost one since. Figuring that even a consumer-grade UPS gives as much protection as a decent surge unit, it's got to be better than nothing!!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    42. Re:Close Call by I.M.O.G. · · Score: 1

      Or you could not overcomplicate things and make a rule of thumb judgement by the weight of the unit... Heavier units feature larger heatsinks, more windings, and all components are just generally heavier as a result of their beefier nature. If you have been exposed to a good number of PSU's, weight is readily discernable, and it is a FAIR indicator of quality.

      This can be done without opening the PSU. A cheap PSU will undeniably be lighter than a fortran, antec, or PCP&C.

  2. Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by garcia · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But because computers are so complex, it's inevitable, and usually not very long, before they stop working as they should.

    This is your first mistake. Computers are not inherently complex (even Windows). People have a habbit of making computers more complex than they need to be (i.e. installing whatever whenever and expecting it to remain on there and stable forever). If people would just take the time to understand that they do not need 10000 things in their tray and took the 10 minutes to read exactly what each of those things they installed did they would quickly learn what the Uninstall Program feature is for.

    When a domestic appliance goes wrong, you can ring a repair man. When your car breaks down you can call the garage. But when your computer system goes wrong, who do you call?

    Google or a manual. Just like I did for my burned out tail-light on my car, the squeaking dryer, and the rattling my engine made when it spun a rod. Now, in the case of the spun rod there was nothing *I* could do without taking it to the dealer to repair but at least I had an idea of what to expect when they told me what was wrong with it.

    The simple truth is that although computer systems are sold as consumer goods like fridges or washing machines, there's no computer equivalent of a qualified service engineer who you can get to come around and fix things.

    You bought software or your hardware from somewhere I would guess (if you built this stuff on your own you have enough knowledge to fix it on your own). Take it to them. Dell, Gateway, Apple, whoever. If you're talking about software issues, call the company of the software you installed, oooh, it's Spyware problems. You only have yourself to blame for not researching carefully what you put on your computer. Just because you can modify your computer more easily than most pieces of hardware you own does not mean you should be absolved of all responsibility when it breaks. I wish that more people would understand that.

    It seems incredible, but millions of families and thousands of businesses have no-one to turn to but a bunch of unqualified amateurs to fix the most complicated pieces of equipment that have probably ever existed. It's a scary thought.

    What do you suggest? A school where they teach spyware removal? Or do you propose they learn about securing their networks (wireless and wired), their computers w/firewalls, spyware and virus protection (and frequent scans/updates), and keeping abreast of new news about OS updates and protections to the latest and greatest things out there? Why not spend the 20 minutes reading one of my posts or the 10000000 other posts out there that tell you exactly what you need to know:

    1. Get a software firewall (ZoneAlarm) that tells you when an internal software package is calling home.
    2. Get AdAware, SpyBot, and SpywareBlaster. Keep them up to date and scan frequently.
    3. Install all the latest updates for your OS and keep them up to date.
    4. Don't install something that you don't understand. Check with Google first. It's not hard to spend the 5 minutes with a Google search on the name of the program you want to install to find out if it phones home (and if you don't at least you have ZoneAlarm to give you a heads up).
    5. Get some sort of virus protection (i.e. NAV or AVG)
    6. Realize that regular maintenance is required for ANY piece of hardware (cars, HVAC, etc). Do you not change your oil every ~3000 miles? Do you not check your air filters in your home every month or two? Do you not add water softener salt every month?

    I just gave five pieces of software that are free, easily found on reputable/major distribution sites, and that have probably been repeated elsewhere thousands of times. It amazes me that someone who claims that he can fix other people's problems didn't find this software and then had the audacity to claim that the software out there sucks.

    If only more people were w

    1. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by gotr00t · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Realize that regular maintenance is required for ANY piece of hardware

      I know what you mean, but I have seen old computers that use the Intel 8086. They have been running pretty much non-stop for decades and their cases have never been opened once.

    2. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by prof_tc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, but I'm one of those computer students...
      If people started fixing their own computers, I'd be out a lot of my spending money.

    3. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by garcia · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know what you mean, but I have seen old computers that use the Intel 8086. They have been running pretty much non-stop for decades and their cases have never been opened once.

      Exactly, and who put them into place when they originally put them online? People who spent the time learning how to properly operate a computer. In this day and age we have a limitless resource of information easily accessed with two clicks.

      If people are unwilling to spend the time necessary to learn even the most basic skills necessary for the general upkeep of their machines then how can they seriously expect them to work flawlessly?

    4. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by skammie · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but if they took a more active role in their maintaining their computers, how would I get free six packs and/or dinners?

      --
      "Fortunately, I'm adhering to a very strict drug regimen to keep my mind limber..."
    5. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by slughead · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The simple truth is that although computer systems are sold as consumer goods like fridges or washing machines, there's no computer equivalent of a qualified service engineer who you can get to come around and fix things.

      The difference between auto mechanics and computer repairmen is that the mechanics have a union which forces licensing on its members to boost the price of labor.

    6. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      1. Zonealarm was good a couple of years ago. Now it's all bloated, very slow to load, and crashes a lot (last time I checked at least). Try Syngate free version instead.


      2. Use only one anti-spyware software. remember, we don't want conflicts do we? it'd be worst these days because most anti-spywares offer "real-time" stuff...potential conflicts.

      One neat trick is to use a Process Viewer (not windows one). Most spywares work by loading transparent exe or attaching dlls to explorer.exe or iexplorer.exe. If your pc is acting up, just open the process viewer, see if there are any suspcious exe, see if there are some suspcious dlls loaded as "modules" for explorer.exe or iexplorer.exe.

      If its a transparent exe, just kill/delete it. If its a explorer.exe dll module (or iexporer), kill explorer from Task Manager, then run cmd to delete that dll from dos mode.

      This trick can work must better; it doesn't even need you to restart the PC...something most spywares ask you to do nowadays.

    7. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Apreche · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Thank you for saying everything for me. The one thing I would like to add is a comment about the unqualified amateurs line. There are indeed people you can call to fix your stuff. But just like carpenters and plumbers and the rest, there ARE some jobs that are too small. And all those people are off making much more money at a real company doing big jobs on computers more important than grandmas.

      The real problem here is that unlike your washers and dryers and televisions there is a constant swarm of people trying to break your computer. And due to the design of the computer it is extremely easy for people to break their own computer. It's just the old tool/device argument. And the inherent problem is that the more you want to push for device to solve the user end issues the more you cause performance and security issues. It's a fundamental rule.

      The only solution is user education. It will be solved in 80 years when all the people who haven't had computers for their entire lives are dead.

      --
      The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    8. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by saskboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You bought software or your hardware from somewhere I would guess (if you built this stuff on your own you have enough knowledge to fix it on your own). Take it to them. Dell, Gateway, Apple, whoever. If you're talking about software issues, call the company of the software you installed, oooh, it's Spyware problems.

      The difference between a computer repair and a car repair, is that the computer repair center can claim your computer broke from a software issue that isn't their doing, whereas a car mechanic isn't going to say, "take this car back to the station you got gas from, they gave you bad gas".

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    9. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by garcia · · Score: 1, Informative

      1. Zonealarm was good a couple of years ago. Now it's all bloated, very slow to load, and crashes a lot (last time I checked at least). Try Syngate free version instead.

      Check again. I've been using it w/o issue since I started running Windows again in 2002. It's at the latest free version and my Windows XP machine has a better uptime than my Linux box.

      2. Use only one anti-spyware software. remember, we don't want conflicts do we? it'd be worst these days because most anti-spywares offer "real-time" stuff...potential conflicts.

      An obvious troll. Just to clarify... SpyBot and AdAware catch stuff that the other one doesn't. It is necessary to run them both at the same time. SpywareBlaster has no effect on AdAware as it doesn't do the same thing but SpyBot does recommend it now.

      If its a explorer.exe dll module (or iexporer), kill explorer from Task Manager, then run cmd to delete that dll from dos mode.

      It's people like you that make the computing world "scary" and "difficult".

    10. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by tehshen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People could learn how to drive a computer, but for most of the time they use one, learning its intricacies is not necessary. Computers can work fine for two to three years before becoming overloaded with Spyware and 'breaking'. When that happens, it is replaced with a new computer, or someone comes along to fix it. This is why the majority of people would not want to learn how to fix a computer, or even need to - nearly all the time, the knowledge is not needed.

      It is equivalent (sort of) to learning a new language for a month, all its ins and outs and irregular verbs and so on, so you can speak fluently in a foreign country for a week. Yes, there is a chance you could visit again, but you probably won't. And from then on you'd know a language you would not need to use at all.

      --
      Guy asked me for a quarter for a cup of coffee. So I bit him.
    11. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Thunderstruck · · Score: 1

      The difference between auto mechanics and computer repairmen is that the mechanics have a union which forces licensing on its members to boost the price of labor.

      Where? (Mechanics do not generally have a special union here in the Dakotas. They tend to be independent contractors.)

      --
      Trying to use sarcasm in text-based forums does not work.
    12. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I know what you mean, but I have seen old computers that use the Intel 8086. They have been running pretty much non-stop for decades and their cases have never been opened once.

      I was playing Jupiter Lander on my 22-year-old VIC-20 on the weekend. Still works fine, though I have to wonder why the game developers thought that Jupiter has a rocky surface...

    13. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here, I've corrected your post a bit =)

      1. Get a software firewall (ZoneAlarm) that tells you when an internal software package is calling home. This isn't necessary. The XP firewall included w/ SP2 does this, and should be more than enough for most users.
      2. Get AdAware, SpyBot, and Microsoft Antispyware. Keep them up to date and scan frequently. MS Antispyware will update itself, is free to Windows users, and is by far the best at detecting and removing spyware. The advanced tools of Spybot are quite nice though.
      3. Install all the latest updates for your OS and keep them up to date.
      4. Don't install something that you don't understand. Check with Google first. It's not hard to spend the 5 minutes with a Google search on the name of the program you want to install to find out if it phones home (and if you don't at least you have ZoneAlarm to give you a heads up).
      5. Get some sort of virus protection (i.e. NAV or AVG) and KEEP IT UPDATED. McAfee Stinger can also be useful sometimes w/ this.
      6. Realize that regular maintenance is required for ANY piece of hardware (cars, HVAC, etc). Do you not change your oil every ~3000 miles? Do you not check your air filters in your home every month or two? Do you not add water softener salt every month?

      Also, one of the most important points is to turn off System Restore in XP. Wouldn't it be great if you restored to a point where you were infested w/ viruses hehe?

      Anyway, no offense, but just offering some other suggestions. Also, you'd be suprised how often chkdsk /r C: can save seemingly hosed Windows installations.

    14. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why wait 80 years? Let's kill them NOW!

    15. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by LordPhantom · · Score: 1

      Sweet holy cupcakes, what did you DO to your linux box that it has less uptime than your windows box?

    16. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mechanics where I live don't have that . . . and I've only found one mechanic in five years of looking that hasn't ripped me off.

    17. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by ChaosCube · · Score: 1

      Good points. However, I don't do any type of water softening. Now, if you mean stool softening...

      --
      BDR Gear
      Outdoor gear, MREs, and more!
    18. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by sh00z · · Score: 1
      The difference between auto mechanics and computer repairmen is that the mechanics have a union which forces licensing on its members to boost the price of labor.
      ...and this is different from MCP how, exactly?
    19. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someday people will get over the fallacy that Windows is less stable than Linux. They are equally as stable if you treat them correctly.

    20. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by TykeClone · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The difference between auto mechanics and computer repairmen is that the mechanics have a union which forces licensing on its members to boost the price of labor.

      The difference is in what is being diagnosed and repaired. Mechanical problems are easier to find and diagnose than electrical or software problems. If you have a puddle of antifreeze in the garage - it's a good sign that there is a problem in the cooling system. If you have a system fan in a computer that makes a god-awful sound when you start the machine in the morning, you may have a fan going out.

      Electrical or software problems are more difficult - for both auto mechanics and computer repairmen. If you go to the shop and tell them that the windshield wipers activate when turning on the radio it will take some time to find that the left rear brakelight was improperly grounded. Software problems can be that sneaky - application "a" worked until application "d" was installed - but the real problem happens when application "c" is running at the same time.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    21. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by jhains · · Score: 1

      Rubens is basically blaming hardware and software makers for buiding machines and distributing code he considers too complex, and then not going out and ensuring that every PC repairman knows how to both solder a burned out CPU back to working condition as well as reverse-engineer and patch source code for every program ever written.

      All of this probably because he forgot to use a virus scanner on an email attachment with the subject line: Big Hot Tits!

      Loser.

      If you can't figure out how to take care of something you own, don't keep it around. Don't try to pass the buck back to the manufacturers simply because you're too lazy to read the manual.

      --
      sig sig sputnik?
    22. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by L.Bob.Rife · · Score: 1

      This is your first mistake. Computers are not inherently complex (even Windows)

      How many other devices in your home have millions of transistors?

      Does your fridge have millions of lines of code like your computer?

    23. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Illserve · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Would you get over yourself already?

      The means to properly operate a computer is as far beyond the reach of the average person as is the ability to tune their car and replace the fan belt. It's not that their stupid,it's that the concepts are completely alien to them. What seems trivial to you is a goddamned nightmare to most adults who grew up without touching a computer.

      And there's also a selection bias, many people who are otherwise smart, just aren't good at dealing with computer-type systems. Those people have avoided computers until they couldn't any longer. Again, not that they're stupid (well not all of them), but everyone is good at some things, and bad at others.

      Computers have gotten much harder to use successfully as they have gotten more powerful. It is not that the people who put together that 8086 did it "properly", it's that there were far fewer ways to screw it up.

    24. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by ibpooks · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, but he will charge you for his time to drain your tank and lines and replace your fuel filter and whatever else may have been damaged by the bad gas. Then he will tell you never to get that gas again. Same goes for spyware.

    25. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by dscottj · · Score: 1

      Arg! My eyes!

      You spin a bearing, you throw a rod. I guess it's the mistake that proves the point.

      Yeah, I know, "mod -1, obnoxious nitpicker", puts me in good company around here, that's for sure. Don't mean it to sound nasty, but I guess it's a little like someone calling their monitor "the computer".

      Bah. I know what happens next. Sixty corrections about hot rod terms in 3... 2... 1...

      --
      AMCGLTD.COM. Where cats, science fictio
    26. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Just like I did for my burned out tail-light on my car, the squeaking dryer, and the rattling my engine made when it spun a rod.

      Did you spine a bearing or throw a rod? Never heard of a spun rod.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    27. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by nmos · · Score: 4, Funny

      In my experience when people try to fix their own computers my billable hours go UP!

    28. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by OhPlz · · Score: 2, Insightful
      How many other devices in your home have millions of transistors?

      For all I know, wood might have a complex cellular structure. It wouldn't matter much to a carpenter. The number of transistors doesn't matter to a computer user either. The number of problems caused by a transistor error are probably quite small.

    29. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by nmos · · Score: 1

      The difference between auto mechanics and computer repairmen is that the mechanics have a union which forces licensing on its members to boost the price of labor

      No, the difference is that it's actually HARDER to find a qualified and honest mechanic.

    30. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      I got so sick of my friends and relatives and now my girlfriends friends and relatives coming to me for computer advice that I no longer do it for free.

      To make it worth my while I charge a $40-$50 to check out a machine. That gets them AVG, Ad Aware SE and Spybot S&S installed and up to date. I'll clean out all known spyware/viruses and defrag the system.

      The software is all free, I'm charging them to make the irritation worth my while.

      If only more people were willing to take an active role in everything they do (kids, computers, etc). Things would work a whole lot better. Then again, we live in a society where we expect everyone else to be responsible for everything we do. Time to own up and face the facts.

      Some people should not own computers. Some people should not have children. If you're not willing to take a little time and educate yourself about something, you have no business getting involved.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    31. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Also, the worst thing an incompetant PC tech can do is reduce your computer to a state that requires a format and re-install to fix. The only things that could possibly be damaged permanently are your data files, and even they can almost always be recovered simply by putting your HD into another, working computer.

      Auto mechanics, on the other hand, actually have to do work on a real, physical machine. They can't undo their mistakes just by sticking in a recovery disc. Plus, cars cost a hell of a lot more money than home PCs do, and, in some situations, can put your life and the lives of others in danger when things go wrong.

      Fixing cars and fixing computers are completely different things, and should be treated differently.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    32. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by friedmud · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I wholeheartedly agree with all you wrote... but let me throw some more fat on the fire...

      I think people are too afraid of their computers. Let me explain... I was just last night helping my wife (over the phone) fix her parents computer. It had erotic popups all over the place and the computer had ground to a halt (only took about 5 minutes for the computer to stop responding after a reboot). This was a particularly nasty situation.

      I had given her a CD with SpyBot and Adaware and Firefox on it to take with her (she was going to visit for easter)... the problem was whenever she would try to run either SpyBot or Adaware the computer would restart (maybe some adware was detecting it? I seriously don't know).

      So what's the solution? I had her get all the documents they wanted to keep off the computer and onto a CD (luckily the computer would work long enough to get this done)... and then I walked her through resetting the (Dell) computer back to factory defaults.

      In working with her over the phone (she is in NO way computer savvy... just a good user) I noticed that she was always reluctant to do ANYTHING without me telling her EXACTLY what to do. Occasionally (not familiar with their computer) I didn't know EXACTLY how to get passed a certain screen and I would just tell her take a look at what she was seeing and make a choice. Finally after doing this several times I told her "You CANT break it! We're wiping the computer clean! Just choose something and if it doesn't work we can start over!"

      She is not alone. I find often that people are reluctant to explore their computers. If you've got all your documents backed up what is the worst that could happen? There is NO way to (physically) hurt the computer with software. As long as you have reinstallation CDs JUST GO FOR IT!

      Ok - long story... I apologize...

      Friedmud

    33. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by DA-MAN · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Someday people will get over the fallacy that Windows is less stable than Linux. They are equally as stable if you treat them correctly.

      Stability != Uptime

      Fact of the matter is that if you install your updates on Windows you almost always have to reboot, which is not the case on Linux. If you keep your Windows and Linux box up to date your uptime in Linux will be higher than your uptime in Windows plain and simple.

      As far as overall stability Linux is more stable than Windows because Windows getting screwed up is an accepted part of using Windows because spyware/crapware/worms spread like fire and the default permissions on the filesystem allow all users access to everything!

      True any system can be secured with a competent administrator, however most people aren't administrators (and most administrators aren't competent).

      --
      Can I get an eye poke?
      Dog House Forum
    34. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know what you mean, but I have seen old computers that use the Intel 8086. They have been running pretty much non-stop for decades and their cases have never been opened once.

      Because of course whomever opened that case would be consumed by the King Of All DustBunnies.

    35. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      1. Computers are not inherently complex (even Windows).

      While parts of computers are not complex, the way they are used makes them exceedingly complex.

      After reading your comments, I put you in category 3. Maybe a high 3, but not a 4. Here's the scale I use;

      1. Total novice. Knows they know nothing and is entirely willing to ask dumb questions.
      2. Moderately experienced. Willing to do dangerous things but are still a bit gun shy. A bit shy about looking like #1 above.
      3. Experienced enough to think they know it all. Usually focuses on a specific specaialty such as a single OS and/or hardware platform. Brash and certian, preachy.
      4. Humbled. Admits they can't know it all. Tends to go into too many details when asked for advice.
      5. Guru. Admits they can't know it all. Knows how long it would take to learn what they don't know. Gives short answers or does not answer.

      Your over emphasis on using specific tools is enough for me to stand by my categorizing you as a #3, even if you don't have all the typical characteristics. I don't put myself in #5, btw; I'm a 3.5 with moments of 4. The 1s think I'm a 5, the 2s and 3s ask my advice and promptly ignore it. A few times the 2s and 3s come back for advice. 4s and 5s ask me questions though the 5s tend to ask some real good ones (not necessarily difficult).

    36. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by pjbgravely · · Score: 1

      It looks like your talking about a system running Microsoft Windows. You forgot regular temp file cleaning ,Defraging, and getting and using a browser alternate rather than IE, and an email alternate rather than OE.
      Better yet have them install a Linux distro. I am sending all my old clients Xandros, as I do not have the patience to deal with MS Windows anymore. Then their maintenance consists of backups and udates only. I will also include Mplayer so they can watch any vidio that comes there way.

      --
      Star Trek, there maybe hope.
    37. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Spoing · · Score: 2, Funny
      1. The difference between auto mechanics and computer repairmen is that ...

      Wait! Wait! I know this!

      (AHEM!) 'The difference between auto mechanics and computer repairmen is that the auto mechanic knows when they are lying.'

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    38. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It will be solved in 80 years when all the people who haven't had computers for their entire lives are dead.

      Like most geeks, I have helped friends with computers. All of these people have grown up in the digital age, and have been surrounded by computing devices for their entire lives. Many of them are university educated, often with more than one degree. And yet a significant minority of these people simply have a severe mental block when it comes to doing anything complicated with computers.

      Why is this? Dealing intelligently with computers requires you to see problems sequentially, and to break them down into individual steps of action. I have taught computer programming at both the university and technical college levels -- and after seeing some people struggle terribly to grasp the most basic elements (people who were by no means stupid), I am forced to conclude that there is at least some natural aptitude that goes along with computer use. It is the sort of natural aptitude that correlates highly with ability in math and logical reasoning.

      In my opinion, there is currently a serious deficiency in user interface design. User interfaces are designed by people who are good at computers, and as a result they are best used by people with similar minds. The attitude taken by many designers, repeated several times in this thread, that the end user should just "learn", is arrogant at best and dangerous at worst. It is this attitude that has led us to where we are today, where most systems and devices marketed to the mass public ship with security features turned off -- because otherwise the end user could never figure out how to use them!

      Surely there is a better way.

    39. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by rpdillon · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think computers *are* inherently complex. Ever taken a computer architecture course? I loved the course when I took it, even though it was a boatload of worl, but I have to admit, my initial reflections on the clas were "Wow, it a friggin' miracle those computer things work at all!"

    40. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Roryking · · Score: 1

      Might I also reccomend Microsoft Antispyware? I wrote a review and I think it's wonderful. I was pretty shocked to find something with "Microsoft" on it that also seemed to work, but in my honest opinion (note: I'm something of an amature) it seems to work quite nicely. It caught things that Spybot, Ad-aware and McAfee didn't catch. And removed them in such a manner that they didn't "regenerate" (as MS-AS put it) as most spyware does. Seriously a nice piece of software.

    41. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm. You must not have seen WarGames. Computers can put your life on the line too.

    42. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you managed to "spin a rod," you'd end up with some pretty interesting bits and pieces left over in the oil pan :)

    43. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by ZosX · · Score: 2, Informative


      The difference between a computer repair and a car repair, is that the computer repair center can claim your computer broke from a software issue that isn't their doing, whereas a car mechanic isn't going to say, "take this car back to the station you got gas from, they gave you bad gas".


      I've heard car mechanics tell people this. You would be amazed at how much bad gasoline is out there. Case in point, one lady I worked with was having lots of hesitancy problems with her engine, after a few trips to the mechanic, he eventually deduced that nothing was wrong with the car and that she was merely getting bad gas. He didn't charge her a great deal and told her to try filling up at another station in the future. Voila! The car magically started running fine. Its all too possible that older gas stations and such may have issues with their tanks getting moisture in them and such, even in the new age of federally mandated double walled tanks. Never rule out bad gas is my point.

    44. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Eggplant62 · · Score: 1

      I've spent a good portion of my career opening these very machines to find them so clogged with dust that it was a wonder that they were able to operate at all, and it was usually a PSU failure that promped my intervention. If the owner had the foresight to open the machine every six months and blow it out with commonly available canned air, he would have never needed my services.

      Coincidence? I think not.

    45. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

      Somehow I get the feeling that the people admining WOPR weren't about to call some guy whose ad they saw on a postcard in a newsagent's window when things go wrong.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    46. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am sending all my old clients Xandros, as I do not have the patience to deal with MS Windows anymore. Then their maintenance consists of backups and udates only. I will also include Mplayer so they can watch any vidio that comes there way.

      Wow. What an ingenious way to make your old clients realize how useless you were.

    47. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Eggplant62 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This guy's never been on the receiving end of a service call generated by an ID-10-T error or what we commonly refer to in the service business as "loose nut behind the keyboard." He's also never tried to figure out a problem when all the user can tell you is, "It won't work, I don't know what happened," and has no recollection of what error messages he may have seen when his machine failed, or has not documented the series of events that caused his error.

    48. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by tehcrazybob · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The only solution is user education. It will be solved in 80 years when all the people who haven't had computers for their entire lives are dead.

      Hardly. I'm a college student, so the people around me are young enough that they have been surrounded by computers from the day they were born. And yet, many of them are clueless. Just a few weeks ago we had an email virus running amok on campus. I remember when I got the first virus email, my roommate and I laughed as we predicted how many more of those messages we would see in the next week or so. Needless to say, we were not disappointed.

      Some of the people in my classes have no idea what to do with their computers. I mean, most are fully capable of using the computer successfully - complexity isn't an issue. But security is. I overhear people talking about their computers, and it's all I can do to stop myself from laughing at them. I've also had a few friends switch from Mac to Windows. Using a Mac, they had never had to deal with anything but the most basic security before, and I think they were a bit overwhelmed when they realized how much attention they needed to pay while using Windows.

      The problem is caused by people of any age who treat computers as simple tools. Many people just aren't interested enough in computers to learn what they need to know. User education is key, but we have to find a way to get average people interested in education. A computer isn't just a tool. When was the last time you had to do maintenance on your screwdriver?

      --
      Computers need to explode more often.
    49. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by bogaboga · · Score: 1

      You should also have asked him to install/use some form of Linux. Linspire 5.0 looks good at the moment.

    50. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by deathazre · · Score: 1

      spun a rod bearing, I'd hope...

      --
      Karma: Negative (Mostly affected by dorm trolling)
    51. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by flynns · · Score: 1

      Also, the worst thing an incompetant PC tech can do is reduce your computer to a state that requires a format and re-install to fix.

      -cough- Bullshit. I wish.

      I was working for a tech firm here in Northwest Florida (Netdata Consulting Services; I am no longer employed there, but not because of this).

      Simple task: Switch out a processor. It was one of the old Socket 7 chips, before they had the good sense to put a little screwdriver-place on the bracket that holds the heatsink to the motherboard.

      Flathead screwdriver slipped, and punched down on the board. Severed five of the data lines going into the socket. Needless to say, the computer didn't start; needed a new board - which was difficult, because Socket 7 boards hadn't been in production for about 4 years at the time. Ebay. Yippee.

      Ah, if only "reformat and reinstall" cured everything.

      As a side note, my computer and my Chevy S-10 would go for about the same price retail, although I suspect this says more about my truck than my computer...

      --
      'If you're flammable and have legs, you are never blocking a fire exit.'
    52. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Mancat · · Score: 1

      About the only time you will get bad gas from a station is if you fill up just after they've had their tanks refilled. When the tanks are refilled, sediment from the bottom of the tank is disturbed. The sediment is usually fine enough to pass through the fuel filter, and is more than enough to affect the quality of the fuel. So, if you see the truck leaving the station, go to a different one.

      --
      hello dear sirs my name is jamesh i are india (bihar) can u guide me install red had linux 9?
    53. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by cynyr · · Score: 1

      having played with both old and new hardware...i would say the old stuff is higher quality, might be that all my "old" is server grade, and all the new stuff is consumer grade. i have 350MB scsi drives that work beutifuly. just my $0.02......

      --
      All of the above was encrypted with a Quad ROT-13 method. Unauthorized decryption is in violation of the DMCA.
    54. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by jdgeorge · · Score: 1

      I think the parent's point was that the mechanic won't send you back to the gas station (or restaurant, as may be the case) where you got the bad gas to get the bad gas fixed.

    55. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Schreckgestalt · · Score: 1, Insightful
      The difference between auto mechanics and computer repairmen is that the mechanics have a union which forces licensing on its members to boost the price of labor.

      Another difference is that an auto mechanic knows exactly what can happen to a car. He knows exactly what to do when the engine is broken or whatever.

      Computer repairmen, however, are confronted with an unlimited amount of different issues, and that is also the reason why I stopped offering my help to people who know nothing of computers. When I see a popup that says "Click me NOW!!!11", I don't click it, because I don't know what that's going to do to my computer. Neither do they, but these idiots just click (probably thinking "Hey, if I break something, I'll just call good old Schreckgestalt and ask him to fix it"). And then I am there, sitting at their computer, and have no idea what these people did and they expect me to have a solution (a solution that doesn't include "wipe the disk and reinstall windows and never, ever use Internet Explorer again").

    56. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by TykeClone · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Even sitting the computer on a small stand an inch or so off of the carpet does wonders for keeping dust out of a machine.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    57. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

      Processor installations are somewhat beyond the scope of what amateur computer techs are typically called to do. TFA specifically stated that the author only had to handle a hardware issue once.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    58. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Brandybuck · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Imagine you buy a new base model Honda Civic. You then go to twenty different third party after-market vendors for stuff like air conditioning, cruise control, etc. You replace your standard fuel filters, brake pads, etc., with stuff ordered online. You get a series of spams about putting magnets in your gas tank and taping crystals to your spark plugs, so you do it. You never change your oil or rotate your tires because it's too difficult to remember to do it. Whenever something goes wrong you have a twelve year old neighbor kid look at it first.

      What is your legitimate auto dealer going to say when you bring your car in for service? He's going to laugh in your face!

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    59. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Enigma2175 · · Score: 1
      You bought software or your hardware from somewhere I would guess (if you built this stuff on your own you have enough knowledge to fix it on your own). Take it to them. Dell, Gateway, Apple, whoever. If you're talking about software issues, call the company of the software you installed, oooh, it's Spyware problems.

      The difference between a computer repair and a car repair, is that the computer repair center can claim your computer broke from a software issue that isn't their doing, whereas a car mechanic isn't going to say, "take this car back to the station you got gas from, they gave you bad gas".


      I think that is a bad analogy. An automotive analogy to spyware is taking your car to the mechanic after you installed a 'SUPER BOOSTING FUEL PUMP!!!!!111!!!11' that actually diverts half your fuel to the company that gave it to you. Did I mention that 'ITS TOTALLY FREE!!!!'?
      --

      Enigma

    60. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by 615 · · Score: 1

      The problem with ZoneAlarm (these days) is TrueVector. It effectively puts a limit on the number of simultaneous connections you can have by SUCKIN UP ALL THE CPU. I'm still not 100% sure how to run, say, BearShare, AND browse the Web at the same time. Reducing [any connection-heavy app's] max connections thus far has not helped.

    61. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      The "B" Ark?

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    62. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by marco0009 · · Score: 1

      Man, I would hate to see all the dust gunked up in that computer's fan.

      --
      Physics makes the world go 'round.
    63. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they will charge you horrendous amounts of money, replace 3/4 of your engine, and your problem still will not be fixed.

    64. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by nottsp1 · · Score: 1
      But when your computer system goes wrong, who do you call?

      Google or a manual. Just like I did...

      Not if you're Sidney round the corner who's internet's frigged.

    65. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by ettlz · · Score: 1
      There is NO way to (physically) hurt the computer with software.

      Not the kind of stuff on a restore CD, no. But, just to be pedantic, something that can switch off fans or tweak CPU voltages could make pain.

    66. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Gogogoch · · Score: 1
      If people would just take the time to understand that they do not need 10000 things in their tray and took the 10 minutes to read exactly what each of those things

      Let's see, that would be 100,000 minutes or about a man-year of work. Hmmm, no, computer aren't complicated.

      Seriously though, computer systems become very complicated very quickly, and I bet most of the experts here on Slashdot would agree. The five things you mention are beyond most people.

    67. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by saskboy · · Score: 1

      The analogy is still sound, but your point is good. You don't have to modify your computer very much, or any at all, for a sales depot to tell you to find service elsewhere. It's definitely a different repair market than the auto industry has.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    68. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by cowscows · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Total agreement on your point. You learn a whole lot by just trying stuff, and seeing what happens. Sure, sometimes you break stuff, but that's part of the game. Now, I know not everyone has the time to do that every time something breaks, but you can at least try clicking on a few dialog boxes before looking for help.

      My mom calls me with computer problems from time to time. I currently live about a thousand miles from her, so it's not that easy for me to diagnose and fix her problems, so I don't particularly enjoy it. Occasionally she'll call me while I'm busy at work, and so I can't even try to help her. A few times when that's happened, she's called me back later to tell me that she spent some time experimenting, and she figured out whatever it was that was giving her problems. So I know she can figure out some of it. She's no geek, but she's smart and when she actually tries, she makes progress on her problems. And even if she can't figure it out completely, when I do get around to helping her, she knows more about the problem, and we make progress faster.

      I just wish she'd accept that, and not call me as quickly in the future.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    69. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by saskboy · · Score: 1

      "the mechanic won't send you back to the gas station (or restaurant, as may be the case) where you got the bad gas to get the bad gas fixed."

      That's correct. If someone takes their computer back to Walmart in Canada, odds are they will be waiting weeks for it to be shipped off to a service center. That's scary, because these people will not likely have backups of their digital photo collection, I mean who in the right mind would trust Walmart with all of their photos... oh wait :-\.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    70. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by MayorDefacto · · Score: 1
      Imagine you buy a new base model Honda Civic. You then go to twenty different third party after-market vendors for stuff...

      Sounds like a rice-boy to me...

    71. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "mechanics have a union"

      This would be news to the mechanics where I live. They are all independent or regular hourly "hire at will" workers.

    72. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by ettlz · · Score: 1
      Does your fridge have millions of lines of code like your computer?

      I read somewhere that someone put a laptop in a fridge to get it through a big compile job; does that count?

    73. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by AltaMannen · · Score: 1

      "What is your legitimate auto dealer going to say when you bring your car in for service? He's going to laugh in your face!"

      You don't think he'll try to reinstall Windows 95 on the sucker?

      I haven't got a windshield wiper pamphlet about spark plug crystals, am I parking in the wrong lot or could you forward me a phone number or something about it because I could see my car going faster with some of those...

    74. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by nolife · · Score: 1

      Those are "professional associations" used for testing and certification of some skill meets some level. The place of employment normally forces the certifications (not licences) as it looks good to have plaques on the wall. Not that I fully agree with either but that is a huge difference from what functions a union provides.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    75. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      > There is NO way to (physically) hurt the computer with software.

      Well, no, that's not really true. You can permanently damage a monitor by trying to drive it to scan frequencies it's not capable of. (Some of the flyback transformer's failure modes can be pretty darn spectacular, too) Irremediably corrupting your BIOS may not be physical damage, but it might as well be. It is very difficult to hurt the computer physically with software; that I'll give you.

      Chris Mattern

    76. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's ID-10-T User error. Get the term right.

    77. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      > the worst thing an incompetant PC tech can do is reduce your computer to a state that
      > requires a format and re-install to fix.

      Unless you were fool enough to let him open the box.

      Chris Mattern

    78. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      and the rattling my engine made when it spun a rod. Now, in the case of the spun rod there was nothing *I* could do without taking it to the dealer to repair but at least I had an idea of what to expect when they told me what was wrong with it.

      Tee hee...your car still uses pushrods.

    79. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by coronaride · · Score: 1

      I agree with you on all of your points; there's just one problem - the people who need to take this advice probably don't read slashdot. That's just a guess...and I suppose that's the crux of the issue. Your average Joe wants all the benefits of using a computer (e.g. staying up to date on late breaking Hollywood gossip, checking e-mail, downloading programs to keep his/her system clock on time, watching play-by-play sportscasts via java applets) without really letting the computer rule their lives. Most people I know wouldn't consider themselves a "computer person" and, furthermore, they wouldn't want to. They don't want to have to keep up to date on the newest malware and how to prevent it, but they still want to be able to install the Jessica Simpson screensaver that came in through their e-mail account. It's quite a dichotomy when you think about it. Screw it - let's throw it all away and go back to hunting and gathering. :)

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, go into business for themselves.
    80. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by garcia · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I never worked in a call center for tech support with and endless stream of callers that say my "Internet is broken" when they really mean that home.excite.com changed to www.attbi.com.

      I never dealt with family members that said that WinME is the best Windows OS to ever be created and AdAware isn't a valid piece of software and proceeded to remove it and the firewall installed.

      You're 100% right... Oh wait, no you're not. Perhaps you should read through some of my history. Just b/c people out there aren't educated does not mean they shouldn't take the time to be.

      Thanks for trolling.

    81. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      The difference between auto mechanics and computer repairmen is that the mechanics have a union which forces licensing on its members to boost the price of labor.

      No, the difference is that if your auto mechanic screws up you can be dead. Tire blowouts, brake or other control failure, car fires, an airbag that deploys at the wrong time...events that put not just the driver but other people on the road (heck, people who live near the road) at risk.

      An automobile crash can be a much more serious event than a personal computer crash. It is entirely appropriate for the state to license and regulate automobile mechanics.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    82. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by bkruiser · · Score: 1

      So my mother-in-law should only purchase a computer if she is willing to become an administrator for it, checking daily for ad-ware and viruses as well as defraging and other odd jobs? Your idea of a consumable is twisted! Gameboys are a consumable... you turn it on, and use it. PS2 and Xbox... those are consumables. PC's have been improperly marketed and expectations raised to the point where this consumable requires more maintenance than use by the average consumer. We have millions of users who have become unwitting and unwilling admins. Please tell me why Windows Update, LiveUpdate, AutoDefrag and a miriad of others try (poorly) to address that fact? Can you alter your dishwasher accidently removing the heater core? Would you ever be told to flash your stereo's radio station bios so that the new stations work? Get Serious!

    83. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by garcia · · Score: 1

      3. Experienced enough to think they know it all. Usually focuses on a specific specaialty such as a single OS and/or hardware platform. Brash and certian, preachy.
      4. Humbled. Admits they can't know it all. Tends to go into too many details when asked for advice.
      5. Guru. Admits they can't know it all. Knows how long it would take to learn what they don't know. Gives short answers or does not answer.


      And oh how wrong you are... I don't know anything and I don't pretend to know anything. I know a small part of the possible world and I consistently preach that I only know that small piece.

      You, OTOH, I place into what I call the asshole realm. The one where you try to diagnose the status in the world for others. The one where you think you can decipher the meaning and direction of another person's life with what they post to Slashdot on a given day.

      Considering that I use various OSs daily including Windows, Linux, and MacOS I would have to say that I have no specialty. I especially know very little about Windows (and I have publically stated that Windows makes it very difficult TO KNOW what is going on w/your machine).

      I like to believe I know what's going on w/Linux as it lets me know the intricate details of the booting, configuration, and general operation of itself and many other programs through detailed logs.

      I know I know nothing about the Mac. I don't need to. It kinda just works for now. I also don't try to push it too much though. Maybe I'll sit down and tinker with it when I have some time.

      Now, for you, I suggest you do some real research into me. Possible google for my posts and read over them (including my thoughts on Windows and how it doesn't let you know anything, my thoughts on how Linux is not ready for the desktop, etc). Maybe then you will better be able to classify me.

      Until then I suggest you sit back, sign up for an account, and post under that so that I can research your inadqueate posts and troll on them.

    84. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by houghi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In working with her over the phone (she is in NO way computer savvy... just a good user) I noticed that she was always reluctant to do ANYTHING without me telling her EXACTLY what to do. Occasionally (not familiar with their computer) I didn't know EXACTLY how to get passed a certain screen and I would just tell her take a look at what she was seeing and make a choice.

      You just described 95% of any helpdesk call.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    85. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Wavicle · · Score: 1

      You are committing a lot of equivocation. Primarily you are linking "computers" with "the environment I run on my computer."

      Computers are quite complex. Why can't software be produced that has the same rate of failure as the typical bridge, skyscraper or HVAC unit? Because the complexity of software running on a computer is substantially higher. You do realize the reason you know of so many engineering failures is because they stand out against a pattern of very high success, right? The number one reason an update to software is released: new problems found with the previous version.

      --
      Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
      Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
    86. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Illserve · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You are being unrealistic because you assume it takes them the same amount of time to learn as you.

      My parents have been working at this hard, for months now. But even the simplest aspects of using a computer have escaped them until recently. These people, god bless them, don't understand that a document, a batch file and a program are the same type of thing on the hard drive. It's just a question of the contents and whether the computer tries to run it or not.

      Ditto with so many little things that you and I take for granted.

      So what, for you, seems to be a trivial amount of courtesy time, is for them the equivalent of learning to speak a foreign language in terms of time investment. And it's not even as much fun.

    87. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by dresgarcia · · Score: 1

      Regardless of the numbers of transistors and lines of code computers are inherently simple. . .and if you disagree give me something better than flamebait to go on. . .
      But im not sure thats the point, the overall operation of a computer is quite simple, it gets complex when you get into more complex software(which is most software I guess these days), and more complex hardware (which most of the people he mentions would not tend to have).
      People are scared of their computers, they never took the time to understand what a hard drive is or how it works (I could give you a basic explanation by word of mouth in under then minutes that would tell you how a hard drive works and why you should not be scared to click around in folders or remove certain files). I mean come on my mom is afraid to click on something if she doesn't know EXACTLY what it does. I even have a superior at my tech company who wont do things in linux because it intimidates her and using a command line makes her think she will cause the computer to explode.
      When you start driving and buy a car you learn basic upkeep, when you have a freezer you have to clean the ice out every couple of years, you empty the bag in your vaccuum (and get it service regularly if you want it to keep pulling that hair out of the carpet), well. . . COMPUTERS HAVE BASIC UPKEEP TOO. Just no one practices it, how many average users do you know that have set their windows update to automatically download critical updates and either automatically install them or prompt you for install, or have a properly configured firewall with up to date virus software. . .
      I set my parents up with Norton, configured the firewall on the router and change the basic login info, I set the computer to alert for updates, automatically update NAV and gave them firefox and configured it to be a bit more ssecure. They have not called me in a good 8 months for help with that computer. It used to be every 3-4 months.
      I also educated both my parents on the basics of what I was doing to their computer and what they had to do to keep it in that condition. . .sure they call to ask about things here and there but I have not had to service the PC at all.
      This is a good example of how properly practicing upkeep on your computer keeps it running, my parents now perform most of the upkeep it needs. They can do this because they now understand.

      users need to be educated or educate themselves and sadly neither is being done. Even more sad is the fact that the latter is extremely easy to do. . . google is the easiest way to get help on a problem. Often faster than going through a manufacturer or retailer.

      Understanding is the key to successful operation.

    88. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      about 6 months ago i got a call from my grandma. she said "my next door neighbours computer is broke, will you come and have a look at it. he'll pay you". So i went round (only round the corner) and had a look. The Microsoft Javascript Debugger was on screen. I said "whats your problem" thinking he was debugging JS and it had really fucked up. he said "whats this? i was on the internet and this came up" i suppressed my laughter, closed it and disabled it (about 6 clicks in all).

      He was a nice guy and he didn't take more than 10 minutes of my time, plus he's my grandma/grandads friend/neighbour so i just said "its fixed and it wont bother you again. I'll be off"

      He practically forced me to take £20 (probably about 30USD) for my 6 clicks.

    89. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by ebyrob · · Score: 2, Insightful
      This guy

      Which guy?

      He's also never tried to figure out a problem when all the user can tell you is, "It won't work, I don't know what happened,"

      At least the user is being honest. Learn to ask the question: "*what* isn't working.", and learn to be nice about it. (Go ahead and strangle the luser in your head if you need to... But even the BOFH doesn't generally resort to impoliteness.)

      ...and has no recollection of what error messages he may have seen when his machine failed...

      So, if the computer knows what the problem is well enough to output an error message, is it too much to expect it to log this information somewhere that an appropriately knowledgeable party can find it later on? Designing systems without this kind of diagnostic facility (and so many other flaws in the modern wintel architecture) seems like an even bigger problem than user ignorance.

    90. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well this follows the "...they dont build them like they used" illusion. It always seems that way when you see the one building,appliance,car...etc that is still working. You neglect the hundreds of other contemporaries that are broken and trashed. The still functioning one is the exception rather than the rule.

    91. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by sammy+baby · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I notice that you conveniently fail to address the lines of code argument. The number of computer problems caused by an errant line of code are probably fairly signifigant.

    92. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We both know that is just beeing pedantic and totally beyond the scope of telling noobs to just try to play with settings.

      You cant go into windows and select some physically damaging scan frequency. You cant go 'file-flash bios with bogus data'.

    93. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


      I don't know where to start...

      Yes, computers ARE complex - both individually and in the aggregate as an industry. With hundreds of different components, hundreds of different manufacturers who just LOVE to "differentiate" themselves by "making the computer easier to use" by making custom motherboards and tweaking the BIOS, and scores of thousands of software written by people all over the map in competence, there is no fucking way you can say computers are not complex. Especially for the non-tech end user. That's just stupid.

      Second, how does the naive end user Google for a PC problem when they don't have a clue what words to use?

      Manuals? HAH! Since when has any recent manufacturer included a manual - especially a manual that ACTUALLY tells you how to troubleshoot a problem - when half the techs in the industry - either on their OWN HELP DESK or outside - can't fix the problem in less than four hours of head-scratching?

      Another stupid remark.

      Take it back to the manufacturer? I can tell you own a locally purchased clone. Dell and the rest have help desks widely recognized as a joke. And software? Right - ask Microsoft to fix something. Fork over $275 first, please. When the average user has a monthly disposable income of $100? Are you nuts?

      And finally, you suggest that adding a firewall and an AV and Ad-aware will solve all their problems. Yes, it will help with THOSE SPECIFIC problems (spyware, viruses, etc.) which are the bulk of tech support calls these days - thanks to Microsoft's fucking incompetence.

      But it does NOTHING for the million other problems that regularly crop up in PCs.

      You're an elitist idiot. You have no clue how fucked up the IT industry is. Get a clue, please.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    94. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > What is your legitimate auto dealer going to say when you bring your car in for service? He's going to laugh in your face!

      BZZZZT! Wrong. He will laugh, but it will be behind your back. He will also charge you an arm and a leg to 'fix' all these problems.

    95. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by decepty · · Score: 1

      Here in California (as I just recently found out), anyone who fixes home/home business computers for a fee *MUST* be licensed by the Bureau or Electronics and Appliance Repair.

      It's the same license needed for fixing Radios and Televisions. No test, no nothing, just $165 a year... And that serves a purpose (other than filling gov't coffers) how?

      --
      Be careful! Bears shouldn't consume large furry dogs.
    96. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by computational+super · · Score: 1

      The VIC-20 was powered by the Motorola 6502 chip, which didn't have a "gaseous material" instruction, just a "rock" instruction. Intel-based chips have been packaged with the "gaseous material" instruction since the 386, and newer MMX-based chips also include the "liquid metallic hydrogen" instruction as well, so Jupter Lander 2000 provides a much better simulation experience.

      --
      Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
    97. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is your legitimate auto dealer going to say when you bring your car in for service? He's going to laugh in your face!

      I've come close and pretty much lost it last week in front of a disingenuous idiot. As the senior network engineer for a broadband company (CCIP, CISSP, CISA and Linux geek since Linus put the very first kernel out), I get lots of the difficult customer escalations. Overall, I have one or two a year maximum that have something to do with something we did - e.g. a DDoS UDP port blocking response in a certain market due to serious activity knocking down someone's undocumented port range service.

      In all other cases, it's CPE (customer prem equipment). Personal firewall lockups are the new rage - Norton apparently likes to get all hosed up and locks up everything but ping and telnet on a PC. Even removing, reinstalling, etc. doesn't resolve. Then there's the bad cable, bad power, bad cheap firewall, home wifi problems, etc. On-site support is $45 for the trip charge, plus $75/hour - a steal since area plumbers and electricians cost just as much or more. Certified technians with trucks filled with tools, current laptops, backed with training.

      Yet nearly 80% of the customers fight back on paying a dime. They insist that as long as their problem causes the Internet not to work, it's an Internet provider problem. Subsequently, we'll give a "once per contract" courtesy call which allows us to educate the customer as we fix their problem, demonstrating our peoples expertise. A second demand usually results in a call from me advising them they're welcome to contact another technician or change service (they're financially not worth the effort and one is wise to fire your bottom 10% of customers from a financial performance perspective). I get a good laugh over "customer is always right" rants too - it puts me in a great Catbert mood.

      Last week, I had one in particular that was on the second demand for free repairs. The line that always amuses me is "this thing has *never* worked" (our system logs show otherwise). That usually elicits a good laugh out of me! As if the Windows ME, thirty malware infections, indoor ethernet wiring run across the lawn soaking up water and snow, daisy-chained outlet plugs loading up a 15 amp service (usually complete with a space heater or two jacked in to the same strip), etc. don't have any effect.

    98. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Trepalium · · Score: 1

      The only thing that bothers me is asking someone what the last thing they did on their compuer prior to it failing was, and getting the stock answer, "I didn't do anything -- it just stopped working by itself". This, of course, forces you to go through an entire long troubleshooting process of figuring out what happened. When you almost inevitably do find out it's user error, you're left with the troubleshooting time, which could've been avoided completely, if the user had only been honest with you.

      --
      I used up all my sick days, so I'm calling in dead.
    99. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by decepty · · Score: 1

      In CA (as I just found out) all persons who engage in home/home business PC repair *MUST* be licensed by the state Bureau of Electronics and Appliance Repair at $165/year... no test.

      --
      Be careful! Bears shouldn't consume large furry dogs.
    100. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by selfdiscipline · · Score: 1

      I agree that using multiple anti-spyware programs at once is a good idea. However, there have been instances of one program detecting another's malware library and classifying it as real spyware. If I was a less-knowlegeable user, I'd be likely to think that somehow adaware/spybot/whatever had been hijacked, and delete it, or maybe go so far as to never trust it again.
      Also, I don't see how running zonealarm would increase your "uptime".

      It's people like you that make the computing world "scary" and "difficult".

      Computing is either or both for many people. I don't think you're very good at relating to those less knowlegeable than you. It sounds like you'd be more likely to treat them with contempt.

      --


      -------
      Incite and flee.
    101. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      The hardware was more expensive and more robust back then. There was less of a disposable computer attitude. The OS was also easily hand-cleaned or hand-installed file by file, line by line.

      Any one of those old machines which have been powered on and off have a problem with chip creep, any one operated in a dusty area probably experienced PS fan failure then PS failure, and any one exposed to humidity probably died from various corrosion problems years ago.

      Yeah, the manuals were better, and you had to read them to be able to do anything. The tech support was also better. A good Microsoft tech would give you a three hour tutorial about the merits and faults of DOS just by calling them up and asking.

      The systems today are more complex. The documentation is poor and mixed with sales hype. The technical support is high price and has a time limit. The technical support technicians are less highschool computer nerds and more crash-course temp placements reading scripts written by highschool computer nerds. Maybe it is information overload.

      I agree that people should be doing more preventative maintinance on their computers, but the real problem is sales people selling "easy to use computers" for people who can't be bothered to learn such techniques. If sales people were honest, they would recognise a need to offer more robust systems...

      But then again we can't forget that the sales people are the people who didn't qualify to work the telephone support.

    102. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      one is wise to fire your bottom 10% of customers from a financial performance perspective

      Until you run out of customers...
    103. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Bloater · · Score: 1

      I think I'm a 4 but with satisfying moments of 5. But you missed one out:

      0. Scared Shitless:

      Guru: What do you see on the screen?
      Scared Shitless: Nothing at all! (Guru translates as "Same blue desktop, task bar, start menu, normal icons, whatever windows SS already had open...")

      G: Hold the Alt key down while you breifly but firmly tap the key marked "F4", then let go of the Alt key.
      SS: Oh no! something's gone wrong, I don't know what's happened.
      G: Did you accidently tap the wrong key, or hit another key as well, or what?
      SS: I don't know what I pressed, I don't pay attention to the effect I have on the world around me.

      SS: It isn't going in.
      G: What isn't going in, and into where?
      SS: When I click, it doesn't go in to the window.
      G: What doesn't go into the window?
      SS: The screen.
      G: How the fuck am I supposed to help with entirely non descriptive references to the things your eyes are seeing?
      SS: I don't know computers.
      G: What colour is the sky?
      SS: Blue.
      G: What colour is predominantly being shown on the TV screen part.
      SS: I don't don't know, what's a colour?
      G: same as normal.
      SS: what is it normally?
      G: Jim has a ball. The ball is Red. Red is a colour.

    104. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry to post as Anon, but I've already modded this thread. I'd be interested to know your reasons why this would be the case. Thank you for any reply you might give.

      jra2004@blueyonder.co.uk

    105. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by r_jensen11 · · Score: 0

      So what, for you, seems to be a trivial amount of courtesy time, is for them the equivalent of learning to speak a foreign language in terms of time investment. And it's not even as much fun. Yeah, talking about computers is way less fun than learning German, Italian, or French

    106. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I've done a lot of in-home tutoring the last few years and the most difficult and most challenging part of it is some way to put across the basics in terms they are familiar with - one has to get to know them, a little. Without some basics, like your example with files, they will always be hopelessly lost.

      But one still can't just expect them to understand the deeper concepts automatically - it's kind of like expecting them to pass a couple college level physics classes and be able to discourse knowledgably about quantum physics. YPMV, of course :)

      I find that it's getting harder to avoid talking over people's heads, especially regarding the internet. fixing hardware hasn't changed too much, it's like taking a car to the garage, you can show them the part, and say "this is broken". At least with bad drivers or bad installs you can just fix it. But Internet problems? Here we go...

      Trying to explain to them how to protect themselves against the huge proliferation of exploits of one sort or another is getting to be lecture rather than just quick pointers ;-)

      (there are very few fields that don't suffer from this sort of problem to one extent or another, but computer technology is undoubtedly one of the worst, especially in the last couple years)

      Disclaimer: A virus has invaded my head, so I may or may not be rambling ;-D

      *Achooo!!*

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    107. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by rawg · · Score: 0, Troll

      [rant on]
      If you can't change the oil in your car or fix a tail light, then it's because your lazy and not because the "concepts are completely alien to them."

      It's the same thing about programming a VCR or even turning on the TV. It's not that it's hard, it's that they are too lazy to either learn or remember.

      Heck, my wife can hang sheet rock, texture it, and paint it, and she learned it in a day by herself. She can repair hole in walls and build window frames. Why, because she is not lazy.

      I'm a computer programmer, yet when I had engine problems in my car, I was able to switch out the entire engine in a day with never doing it before.

      I really look down on people that need to call a service person to change a light bulb.
      [rant off]

      --
      The above is not worth reading.
    108. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by rapidweather · · Score: 1
      This part got my attention:
      Surprise surprise, my phone has hardly stopped ringing.

      Lots of jobs, there.

      It has been my observation that it takes a lot of time, and a certain knack, to work with computers, and the hardware. (I certainly don't know nearly enough, but I keep at it).

      I started out with an ADAM computer, and although I did upgrade it some, I mostly wrote software to run on it. I added the disk drive, and that was a great time-saver.

      According to the ADAM website linked above, it did not have an 8086 processor, but note the speed, of nearly 4 MHZ.

      I remember writing a program that would figure out how long it would take a bank to compound an account to a million dollars, it they started out with one hours pay at the then minimum wage, and deposited the money in a simple saving account.

      ADAM figured out it would take around 1000 years, and I used the "step" smartbasic item, to have the progress of the calculation displayed on the screen.

      How long did ADAM take to do the calculation? Less than 10 minutes. Remember, we are blazing along at nearly 4 MHZ cpu clock speed.

      So, with no internet to look at yet, that's what we did with computers. There was a modem available to connect to bulletin boards, but I didn't get into that then.

      On your post, garcia, I agree with the part, especially, about spending the time necessary to learn. (or not spending the time to learn). Today we have Windows machines with hidden source code, not giving the owners of the PC's a chance to figure it out. And so many PC's shipping with Windows, too.

      If the owners wanted to, where would they start?

    109. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      No, people call the monitor the "tv".

    110. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of software is there so that people only really need to learn the essentials. Them knowing how to block off a number of vulnerabilities isn't needed beceause of the firewall etc...

      The general perception as the parent ( a few up) said is that computers are FAR too complex for the average person, all it takes it someone to learn some of the basics and they are well on their way.

      Thanks to everyone who was trolling. Gee you people are soo predicatable.

    111. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      Me: So, what it'd say on the screen after it went all blue?

      C: Something about a dee-el-el. Do I have a dee-el-el in my computer?

      Me: Yes, you do, and we're going to have to remove it. Think of it as surgery, we biopsied the cancer, and now we're going to remove it.

      C: *doubtful look* Ok. So my norton won't report any more trojans, then, right? I really have a lot of email to read.

      Me: *Sighs, grabs coffee.* Well you see....

      ---

      Heh. Two or three times a week I have to explain to someone at work that the popups on the winXP machines there is not serious, it's just a junk ad. (those bastards are getting really clever in their wording, aren't they? :) We've managed to keep them off the actual register terminals, but the lounge computer (gateway) is a running battle, probably because it gets a lot of net use.

      I still haven't figured out how to teach them how to tell the difference between an advertising popup and a system popup. Oddly enough, it's the younger ones that learn the quickest ;-)

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    112. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and so the industry drives on. Your not sure that the PC fear thing is more through marketing hype? It sure sells loads of PC's were a cheaper one with linux could do the same.

    113. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Delta+Vel · · Score: 1

      It's good that you have a head for systems. Unfortunately, most people don't. There are things you don't understand and won't even if you take the time to try and learn them--people, maybe?--and other people have the same problem with things you understand instinctively.

      A friend of mine works in the administration at my school, and is constantly frustrated by people assuming she knows what they know. She doesn't have time to figure out details of computer systems that you and I take for granted. A professor sent her a link in an email to a computer on the network, and left a link in network places, assuming she'd know where to look. It took her 7 months to find it--she would open her email and scroll through tons of messages to find that one, because she didn't understand the system enough to guess at where the link would be. Finally she found it on the network while looking for something else.

      She has spent hours trying to figure out how to put together documents in different formats or how to move data around in Excel. The first time I really did anything in Excel it took me about three hours to import the data, organize the calculations, and plot the results--she has spent hours at a time with that program alone and still doesn't know how to do things she needs to. It's not for lack of trying, it's just that she's not built for this kind of thing.

      She understands people. She does not understand computers. From your post I'm guessing there could be quite a bit about people that *you* don't understand, or are too "lazy" to figure out.

      --
      It's all fun and games until somebody loses an eye. Then it's fun and games without depth perception.
    114. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Aldric · · Score: 1

      Well, I recently built a new computer. The CD that came with the gigabyte motherboard includes a program called @BIOS that can update the BIOS firmware. The hairs rose on the back of my neck - you can do that from within an operating system? Worse, the program doesn't give the correct binaries for download by default! I'd hate to see the average user using something like that.

    115. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by computational+super · · Score: 1
      People have a habbit of making computers

      You mispelled Hobbit, but yes, people who have a Hobbit of making computers generally find that their computers are very orderly, expecting to find everything in it's place, surrounded by a well ordered and well farmed countryside - stout, good-mooded and enjoying their pipes.

      --
      Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
    116. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by UlfGabe · · Score: 1

      if the neighborhood kid knew alot about cars, he would take off all the stickers and widgets. look in the manuals

      repeat after me age!=exprience, that is exactly the situation here. many older(and younger folks to be honest) dont understand cars.errr computers.

      they get someone who can help them, someone who is knowledgeable. if you don't peddle yourself as an expert and tell them that you might not be able to fix the problem there should be no problem. As i understand it also, the car repair man makes no garuntees about your vehicle.

      in addition, most people, (me included) only bill a minimal charge if it takes a minimal amount of time, (lets say 3 clicks on ad-aware, or some other program)

      and that legitimate car dealer will not care if you asked a kid to do his work, it might be his son for all you know.

      --
      Check journal for info on Anti-TextBook, an idea by me.
    117. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by DogDude · · Score: 1

      It looks like your talking about a system running Microsoft Windows. You forgot regular temp file cleaning ,Defraging, and getting and using a browser alternate rather than IE, and an email alternate rather than OE. Better yet have them install a Linux distro. I am sending all my old clients Xandros, as I do not have the patience to deal with MS Windows anymore. Then their maintenance consists of backups and udates only. I will also include Mplayer so they can watch any vidio that comes there way.

      I tried to install Ubuntu for kicks on a machine I had just installed Windows 2000 on a day ago. The GUI part failed, and I ended up at a command prompt. Now what?

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    118. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by smacktits · · Score: 1

      He's never been on the receiving end of a father-in-law either. This is a real conversation between my friend (he's a network engineer) and his father in law:

      father-in-law: hi
      father-in-law: how can i get my internet back on my desktop???
      friend: your internet?
      father-in-law: the E
      father-in-law: its gone
      friend: you use opera. it's the big red O
      father-in-law: dont like it, i want the E back
      friend: make a shortcut to it from the programs menu
      father-in-law: ??????????????? what????
      friend: in your program menu
      father-in-law: its not there
      friend: trust me, it is
      father-in-law: ok connect to vnc and you do it
      friend: no, i'm busy
      father-in-law: dont fuck me around i need the internet back NOW

      And then people wonder why nobody wants to help them when they fuck shit up.

    119. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by TykeClone · · Score: 1
      Just what I've seen working on machines. At work I've got some people who had a little 1 inch high shelf upon which the PC can sit. The machines sitting on those seem to be much cleaner on the insides than those that sit directly on the floor.

      I'm sure that it has something to do with getting the machine even a little bit away from the source of the dust.

      I always tell people that a PC is the best aircleaner that they can get!

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    120. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by menace3society · · Score: 1
      Hardly. I'm a college student, so the people around me are young enough that they have been surrounded by computers from the day they were born. And yet, many of them are clueless.

      Incidentally, these are also the people who have been surrounded from birth by members of the opposite sex. Really, which would you prefer?

    121. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by eraserewind · · Score: 2

      Lazy, or consider your time more valuable than your money.

    122. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by NuclearDog · · Score: 1

      "A professor sent her a link in an email to a computer on the network, and left a link in network places, assuming she'd know where to look. It took her 7 months to find it"

      Well then, she falls under the stupid catagory. Lazy or not.

      It would probably have taken 10 minutes to ask this professor how to do this or to find someone around the school who knows enough about computers to show her what to do.

      If she is not willing to ask questions, she is never going to learn anything.

      ND

      --
      This statement is forty-five characters long.
    123. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Finuvir · · Score: 1

      And all those people are off making much more money at a real company doing big jobs on computers more important than grandmas.

      I assume you mean "more important than grandma's" (or "grandmas' "). Otherwise you're being very callous.

      --
      Why is anything anything?
    124. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Moofie · · Score: 1

      If you think people who don't have the same sort of intellect that you do are "stupid", then I think you're pretty stupid.

      It would have probably taken 10 minutes to ask, if she had somebody who (unlike you) wouldn't assume that she's stupid because she doesn't know how to work Excel. If she had enough baseline knowledge to even put together a coherent question (I find that, with people and with computers, that is most often the most difficult task).

      There are lots of people in the world. I'm smarter than a lot of them. However, I wouldn't be a very successful person if I went around calling them "stupid" because they don't know the things I know.

      I think you've got a lot to learn, but (just at a guess) I think you're too "stupid" to figure out how to start asking the right questions about how to deal with other people.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    125. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Darthmalt · · Score: 1

      I dont know how many computer parts I've fried in my lifetime. (i'm 21) I started with an old 386 and win 3.1 that was out of date even at that time. After a year or so of constant tinkering, breaking and repair I finally got another computer. By that time my relatives knew I liked computers so they kept giving me old ones to play with. Anytime something broke, which was often, I'd figure out how to fix it, look online, or ask someone to tell me how to do it. Now I can fix most of the common hardware and software problems.

      Just this year I gave my 10 year old brother a pentium 1 that I had overclocked. It runs fire fox, msn and some games so he's happy. And when he breaks it by playing around with the hardware I'll show him how to fix it.

    126. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by andymadigan · · Score: 1

      Not true, my 62 year-old grandfather (Win ME) and my ~85 year-old great-grandmother (Win XP) both use computers that I set up for them every day, they have gotten neither spyware nor viruses, and I make a housecall every month or two to make sure nothing is wrong, and nothing ever is.

      The fact is that computers are not beyond people's understanding, it's that people who use computers are lulled into this idea of "listen to the computer geek and windows, it's smarter than you." Computer users must realise that YOU ARE SMARTER THAN YOUR COMPUTER and IT DOES WHAT YOU TELL IT TO DO, if it doesn't, you have a problem. If you get a pop-up promising to remove all the spyware from your computer, don't trust it. Anyone can put anything on the internet, it's that simple. If you trust the people who make a site, you can probably trust the site, but not it's ads.

      Finally, parents need to lay down the law when it domes to kids on the computer. My advice is to put them on a restricted account with no install rights (get help from your local geek on this), the kids can use AIM Express and you'll save yourself from having to call Dell once a month to remove whatever $%#! the kids managed to put on the computer.

      --
      The right to protest the State is more sacred than the State.
    127. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by toddestan · · Score: 1

      That's exactly the reason I uninstalled Zonealarm. If you use any software like WinMX, Bittorrent, or any other P2P app - expect lock ups. If you don't run programs like that, you're probably OK. Kerio has a simular issue - lots of connections means high CPU usage (though I really like Kerio otherwise), and atleast Kerio doesn't take the system down with it. Sygate is the only free firewall that I have tried that seems to be able to handle high demands, and it's the firewall I currently have installed. Ditto on Windows firewall (never used it myself, but I have enabled it on other people's computers and it seems to do just fine).

    128. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by pjbgravely · · Score: 1

      I started using Ubuntu becouse I felt I was being spoiled by SUSE and wanted something that was hard to use. If you are a beginner try Xandros, SUSE or Mandrake first. I am giving users Xandros becouse it is simple to use and can even look like Windows.
      It sounds like you install had a problem with the X config, you can try startx after logging in but it is probably an unsupported video card. So far I have found that SUSE will install on anything. There is a free version available.

      --
      Star Trek, there maybe hope.
    129. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are on the right track to becoming a /. editor.

    130. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Seq · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I'm in college as well. In a computer programming program. We're all software gurus now, right?

      We (un)fortunately use laptops for everything. I'd say most of the class runs with no firewall and connect directly to the internet at home. The network chatter is incredible (I even had code red in my apache logs one day last year). When they installed windows, they never set an administrator password so spontanious remote shutdowns happen sometimes. The RPC DCOM worm that went around last year was very "fun". The college mandated that all computers connecting to their network have firewall and antivirus. Which was nice for the single day when the college did an audit (Most removed them because "it shows shit down")

      These are people who are training to be professional software developers, but the sad thing is they only see what is laid out infront of them.

      As for users exploring their systems, this is the first exposure many of these people have had to any operating system aside from Windows (We use Linux for our C/C++ based classes) and most people were toughing their way through vim because "its what the instructor uses". Very few people looked for another editor (gedit is right in the menu!).

      I think this is an example of "shocked by complexity". Sure, computers are complex, but I think as soon as most people start seeing something they don't understand immediately, they glaze over and perceive the problem as too hard to solve.

      --
      -- Seq
    131. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My parents have been working at this hard, for months now. But even the simplest aspects of using a computer have escaped them until recently. These people, god bless them, don't understand that a document, a batch file and a program are the same type of thing on the hard drive. It's just a question of the contents and whether the computer tries to run it or not.

      Not to mention the fact that they're all Von Neuman architectures, and the software isn't any different from the data. In abstract terms, the data are just big functions in lambda calculus. In the end, we're all just a collection of subatomic particles, or perhaps just a tiny section of an immense warped spacetime.

      The ability to separate pieces of a whole into recognizable entities is somewhat useful for dealing with the world at this point in our development. Computers are just still too raw with chaos to present a clean, orthogonal, and logical interface.

    132. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Mechcozmo · · Score: 1

      Funny, my Mac running OS 8.6 hasn't needed any of these things and the most work I've ever done on my OS X based Mac is repair permissions....

    133. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You guys are all so Win2K. They're called displays now.

    134. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by L.Bob.Rife · · Score: 1

      Using the car metaphor...

      A Car is simple to operate, you turn the car, put it in drive, and push the pedal.

      That doesn't mean its simple to fix. A car is a complex piece of machinery. Computers are simple to operate, but they are not always simple to fix.

      I agree that most people don't take the time to learn the basics, like learning how to keep their AV software updated, just like my girlfriend didn't realize thats cars actually need regular oil changes until one day her engine totally died.

      Stating that computers are inherently simple devices, is absolutely wrong. There have been millions upon millions of man-hours put into making them (barely) usable by average people, but that doesn't make them simple devices.

    135. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In reading all the posts below I failed to see one I could really relate to.... yes I agree with a lot of them.....but...... Here's the problem I'm plenty computer savvy but I'm an architect by profession and after spending 8-12 hours in the close proximity of computer problems and unfortunately investing far too much time in solving these bullshit issues I get home from work and the absolute LAST thing I want to think about is 'what I need to update, DL, install, patch, and reinstall'
      Btw. I do all the basics and I truly think you should publish your post to be distributed with all new pc purchases.
      Anyway what I can't stand is all the holes and conflicts that 'just come up' we all know someone caused them and the refuses to admit to it but no matter what I end up feeling like I'm back at work for a few more hours before I go to sleep. I truly think about Mac's as an option but then it more thinking to differentiate between work and home. I don't mind running a cluster of ad/spy/virus programs every day or so but when something gets in under the radar it turns into 2-3 hours of my life I'll never get back. Baby sitting is something that should be reserved for willing family members when the wife and I would like a 'night out' it should not be something I need to write into my daily plan for my computer! Any tips for a techie that has a life outside of pc maintenance? thanks y'all

    136. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      Why would a computer that old need active cooling?

    137. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by mjm1231 · · Score: 1

      For many users (actually most, in my experience), Item 1 is contradicted by item 4. I've seen many instances of Zone Alarm giving alerts that even a power user would have trouble deciding whether to allow the application to send/recieve/whatever the case is. Especially Windows components (automatic updates, messenger, netbios broadcasts, etc., etc.) themselves.

      --
      Ideology: A tool used primarily to avoid the bother of thinking.
    138. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Computers are not inherently complex (even Windows).

      I would have said that you sound too intelligent to have said that deliberately but I notice in other posts that you have made a point of standing by that statement. If computers are so simple, please explain (short answers only)

      Which is faster: A P3 Celeron 2.6 , a P4 2.8, or an AMD 64 2.0 and why?
      What is the difference between paging and swapping?
      Name 3 advantages of 10bT over 10b2.
      What is the maximum theoretical speed of a non-concurrent sort.
      How many registers does an Athlon have?
      What does FPGA stand for and where might you use it?
      How does a transistor work?
      What process is the single greatest source of heat inside a CPU?
      How does die size affect yield.
      What is a fourier transform and what impact does it have on pornography?
      Name three factors that affect the optimal number of controls to display at one time in a GUI.
      How many individual controls are present in a vanilla Windows installation?

      Computers are INCREDIBLY, UNBELIEVABLY complex. The fact is that thousands of people each have a particular discipline that they know. Some are experts at squeezing every last bit of energy out of an electron, others are whizzes at human factors engineering.

      I have designed and built simple computers from the ground up. I have thousands of hours of Unix kernel programming experience. I'm really good at what I do. So what I want to know is...

      WHEN DID SUPPORTING MICROSOFT'S SOFTWARE BECOME MY FUCKING PROBLEM?

    139. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try out kerio personal firewall. I'm not associated with them (did buy the product) but it's a helluva lot less bloated and cheesy looking than ZA.

    140. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      Most of the time, the PSU failures I've seen are unrelated to dust (although fan failure in any part of the computer is usually due to dust, cat hair and other particulates). The majority of the time, it's a junky, no-name PSU that has blown at least one capacitor. It's always easy to spot. Crack it open, look for the cap with the brown goo spewed out of the top, with a millimeter of dust glued to that.

    141. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      I learned about one of these with Windows XP sp2 recently. Evidently, the NX bit on athlon64 chips allow for hardware DEP (data execution prevention). You have to implicitly allow and disallow some programs from running. Sometimes Windows prompts you for permission, sometimes it doesn't. I didn't figure out why Battlefield Vietnam was crashing on a client's machine randomly until I came across a page mentioning this 'feature'. After implicitly allowing BFV to execute whatever, the crashing stopped.

    142. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Shaklee39 · · Score: 1

      their stupid

      of course not.

    143. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by mutewinter · · Score: 1

      Sometimes I wonder how growing up with computers affects the brain. There is a very abstract element to it all. I've been interacting with computers for hours a day since about 3rd grade. It would be a completely different experience to have your first computer interaction at 50, let alone try to become an expert.

    144. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Technician · · Score: 1

      This is your first mistake. Computers are not inherently complex (even Windows). People have a habbit of making computers more complex than they need to be (i.e. installing whatever whenever and expecting it to remain on there and stable forever). If people would just take the time to understand that they do not need 10000 things in their tray and took the 10 minutes to read exactly what each of those things they installed did they would quickly learn what the Uninstall Program feature is for.

      Where have you been? Too many programs don't simply uninstall. Too many programs break installed things when run and don't fix the problems when removed.

      Case in point. My wife bought a Dell. It has a bunch of pre-installed programs that ammount to a bunch of demoware. I needed to edit a photo. I fired up the photo editor. It wanted me to register it and buy it on the spot. I simply declined.

      This action took over the scanner. Now my fax and copy machine programs are both broken. Trying to run the photocopy application fires up the photo program and asks where do I want to save the photo. The photocopy program can't find a TWAIN device. Uninstall didn't work. I pulled it out manually. The photocopier still doesn't work. The photoprogram dialog box still comes up but with the error that it can't find the photo editing program. Please re-install it. The photocopier still can't find a TWAIN device. Removing and reinstalling both the flatbed scanner and the FAX and Photocopy programs did not fix the TWAIN hijack.

      Fine call me an amature. There is no professional manuals provided with the computer or offending software. It isn't worth the time to become a professional to fix everything that can go wrong with a Windows machine. There are just too many screwed up apps out there and it does not require an internet connection to hose your machine. The manufacture's pre-installed nag ware is enough to hose it up from what you set up. I guess the manufacture didn't count on my installing photocopy software and FAX software, so the photo editor wasn't expected to mess up these applications.

      If only more people were willing to take an active role in everything they do (kids, computers, etc).

      I can't blame this one on the kids or malware from the internet. I blame it on bad software provided by the manufacture. My third party applications ran fine until I needed to edit a photo. I should have used my photo editing program that came with my camera instead of the one provided by Dell. At least my other machine isn't hosed. It is still functional. I can scan, edit, copy, and fax, but not on the Dell.

      Next time I re-install Windows, I'll uninstall the photo editor instead of trying to run it.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    145. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by kyouteki · · Score: 1

      I assume it's a Gateway brand, not a computer acting as a gateway? If it's running any NT or XP OS, why not lock it down to just the essentials...including Firefox? Or better yet, just Linux it?

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    146. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Technician · · Score: 1

      The means to properly operate a computer is as far beyond the reach of the average person as is the ability to tune their car and replace the fan belt. It's not that their stupid,it's that the concepts are completely alien to them. What seems trivial to you is a goddamned nightmare to most adults who grew up without touching a computer.

      Looked under the hood of a newer car. Try to get past the Check Engine light?

      Much software is built the same way. No documentation. Documentation that amounts to does it have gas and oil. If the thing is running rough, the documentation dies long before a solution is reached. Ever use Windows Help for example. Do you have any idea how often I've reached the end of the Windows Help, but not resolved the problem?

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    147. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by llefler · · Score: 2, Informative

      There shouldn't be a whole lot of sediment in their tanks. If there was, it would be 'disturbed' on a regular basis. A high volume station will fill it's tanks several times a week. And the stations have filters in the pumps that are much better than the ones in your car. If they are getting sediment in the fuel from their supplier, the station is going to be annoyed because their pumps would need a lot more maintenance.

      It's not uncommon for a station, particularly an older station, to have water in their tanks. Maybe an inch in the bottom. It won't normally be pumped out because the supply tube for the pumps sits several inches from the bottom. (Stations don't want to pump their tanks completely dry, a little rain could cause them to float if they were empty) The water would be disturbed when the tank is filled, but in comparison with the amount of fresh fuel being added, it would be minimal and not likely to affect your car. And if it has an ethanol mix, there won't be any water in the tank at all.

      Personally, the only bad gas I have run across in the last 15 years has been in vehicles that have been parked for long periods of time. (or my %^&# motorcycle that I didn't get a chance to ride last year, and didn't re-winterize)

      If you're worried about fuel quality, pick a station with high volume. BTW, in many parts of the country, gas is supplied by pipeline. Distributors all pull from the same pipeline, so there is little, if any, difference in the quality of the fuel being sent to stations.

      --
      It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit. -- Harry Truman
    148. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by kbs · · Score: 1

      I tried to get my mother to try experimenting, while I was watching her. Her response was "I don't want to try things, because I'm too old for this..."

      A computer is something she wants to spend as little time on as possible.

      --
      yours,
      kbs
    149. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two beautifull words for you, System Restore
      Thanks to that i have been able to tinker and install and play about to my hearts content i even intentionaly unplugged the internet installed as many pieces of spyware i could get ahold of and went about tracking down and removing them manualy.
      That will be usefull one day i'm sure of it.
      Small note i did have to use the restore point that time there was one piece that no matter what i could not find the source, my trusty AdAware caught it though.

      Seriously if you have no clue what you are doing the system restore is your best friend. Think of it as a save point or respawn no matter what happens you can return to a safer time.

    150. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by mpe · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I never worked in a call center for tech support with and endless stream of callers that say my "Internet is broken" when they really mean that home.excite.com changed to www.attbi.com.

      It gets worst with those who think they know things. Thus comming up with thinks like "the hard drive is broken" when they actually mean "Windows comes up with a new message when it starts up". Or paraphrase and mutate error messages.

    151. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by goober1473 · · Score: 1

      Hey don't worry one of our admins where I work wouldn't let me boot knoppix on his PC to run "while true do..." to hit his CPU (over heating problems) to stress his cpu and test the new cooler as he was scared it would break it.

    152. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by LogicAli · · Score: 1

      I know that in all likely hood no one will read this as I am posting too late, but WHAT!!!

      The problem with computes is not one of education. Why should an average computer user spend time learning the intricacies of a computer. The problem with computers is that they are too complex. We should be concentrating on making computers as easy to use for the end user, not telling them that they should learn how to use them.

      >Google or a manual.

      When your computer does not work? That is the kind of comment I have heard from ISPs when you phone up becuase your internet connection is broken.

      As for your list of things users should do:

      1. Get a software firewall (ZoneAlarm) that tells you when an internal software package is calling home.
        As an end user I should not have to do this. A good firewall should come free as standard on computers. By the time I have downloaded ZoneAlarm my computer may already have been hacked. This is not a suggestion for users, but should be one for PC vendors.
      2. Get AdAware, SpyBot, and SpywareBlaster. Keep them up to date and scan frequently.
        Most end users do not even know what spyware is, let alone know about these tools. Also whenever I have used these products they have not presented results in an end user friendly way. As before this support should come as standard an end user should never need to worry. Any spyware should be seen and shot down automatically.
      3. Install all the latest updates for your OS and keep them up to date.
        Should be automatic, thank you Microsoft for seeing the light with XP SP2.
      4. Don't install something that you don't understand. Check with Google first. It's not hard to spend the 5 minutes with a Google search on the name of the program you want to install to find out if it phones home (and if you don't at least you have ZoneAlarm to give you a heads up).
        Erm, not much to say here, it is a good general point, but if we got people to only install signed software then perhaps this would be an easier way to eliviate the problem.
      5. Get some sort of virus protection (i.e. NAV or AVG)
        Which works fine until the subscription expires and you forget to extend it.
      6. Realize that regular maintenance is required for ANY piece of hardware (cars, HVAC, etc). Do you not change your oil every ~3000 miles? Do you not check your air filters in your home every month or two? Do you not add water softener salt every month?
        I am guessing for most of these no one. Certainly I leave my oil change to a service. I am not even sure I know how to drain the oil sump. Can't comment on the others as I do not have anything at home that requires them.

      I think the point I am trying to make is that we should be concentrating on helping users with these problems not by saying they need to learn more, or that they cannot learn more or whatever, but we should help them by working to make computers easier to use and harder to mess up. We should recognise that people are afraid of their computers, do not have the time and do not want to spend the time learning how to get round these problems. Great innovation comes when we put our mind to solving problems of usability.

      Well my 2 cents worth.

    153. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by jcr · · Score: 1

      Do you know how to series-wind an induction motor?

      I do, so I declare you unworthy of using a vacuum cleaner.

      Do you know how to change your piston rings?

      I do, so I declare you unworthy to drive a car.

      Blaming the users is absurd. When computer systems are vulnerable to a virus attack, the fault lies squarely with the authors of the vulnerable code. Sure, the script kiddies play with matches, but it's the software developers who keep building houses out of balsa wood and kerosene-soaked flash paper.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    154. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

      No, the difference is that it's actually HARDER to find a qualified and honest mechanic.

      Heh. Whereas computer techs are so socially inept that they are honest to a fault. ;)

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    155. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      "But when your computer system goes wrong, who do you call?

      Google or a manual."

      Not everybody has multiple computers. How are they going to use Google if their computer is broken? And I've seen a few troubleshooting sections of computer manuals. They are rarely of any help.
    156. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds to me like they are both equally obnoxious.

    157. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by hairykrishna · · Score: 1
      "You CANT break it! We're wiping the computer clean! Just choose something and if it doesn't work we can start over!"

      I think this is the most important idea to get across to people. My dad was hopeless with PC's until I explained to him that, no matter what, he wasn't going to 'damage' the PC by messing around with windows settings. That was it- he just started playing with stuff. He's had to re-install a couple of times (who hasn't?) but now he's seriously computer savvy.

      --
      "Physics is to math as sex is to masturbation." -R. Feynman
    158. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by cgaylord · · Score: 1

      And yet, you still don't know the difference between a bearing and a rod? I guess google can only do so much good.

    159. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by TheWormThatFlies · · Score: 1

      Yup, I totally agree with you. Some people, even when they're not terrified that if they click the wrong thing their computer will explode, are afraid of learning how to do new things and lack confidence that they can follow a set of instructions without stuffing up.

      A couple of days ago I was helping my mom to get Firefox to work with the latest version of java installed on OS X. This is a relatively simple process - you download an extra plugin, move two files to the OS X internet plugins directory, and touch them on the command line (or at least those are the vague instructions I found; I never saw the actual readme file). But my parents have dialup, and I had to leave before the file finished downloading, so I had to explain to my mom what to do once it had been downloaded.

      Now, my mom is an intelligent person. She has a university degree. She has been using a computer for at least fifteen years. Nevertheless, I had to explain it several times, and write it down, and open all the necessary windows - because she just seemed to assume that this process was too complicated for her to do, and she would mess something up. She is used to having stuff on the computer not work the way she wants it to, and just giving up because it's probably too hard to fix it (my dad is usually not particularly keen on fixing stuff unless it's bothering him).

      Still, she sent me an SMS later to say that it worked, so that's good. And I recently finally got my parents to ditch the ancient Netscape Navigator they were really attached to and try Firefox in the first place. ("OMG, it's so much faster!")

    160. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by doubledoh · · Score: 1

      I have the same EXACT problem with my dad. He is always calling me on the phone (usually earlier than he should), and I end up snapping after 10 minutes because his 15+ years of using a computer seem to vanish everytime he talks to me.

      Me: "Ok, now go to the file menu--"
      Dad: "Where's that?"
      Me: "Jesus Christ dad, you KNOW where the file menu is!"

      I'm not joking. This is a guy that opens files in Word all day long, but when he talks to me, the "file" menu doesn't exist. I get quite angry because it's not like he doesn't know how to use a computer...he's been using one for longer than I have. It becomes really irritating I suppose because we have taken to time to actually go through all the menus, all the options, the documents, and god forbid, the freaking help file. We have taken the time to google for answers, to browse through forums, and to keep our knowledge up to date and relevant. I guess my point is: if people want to use a computer, then they should LEARN how to use it! You can't drive a car without crashing unless you LEARN how to drive safely. You don't have to know how to take a tight corner at 90 miles an hour, but you should know where the freaking brake pedal and accelerator are before you leave the driveway.

      And now, with the massive amount of spyware/adware/malware etc out there, it seems increasingly important that computer users become more responsible before our networks become overly conjested with cyber sewage. If only we could have a public broadcast everyday urging people to secure their computers by seeking professional help (or simply by reading and adhering to a security website). The idea that there are not professionals out there is absurd. Open the phonebook, look under "Computer Services" etc...and the list is several pages long. People are either lazy, tightfisted, or stupid. The same people that let their computers become breeding grounds for viruses and spyware are probably the same people that don't get oil changed regularly and then wonder why the mechanic hands them a bill for 2 grand.

      I have tried to persuade my dad to spend a weekend really trying to understand his computer, or at least the programs he wants to use. I often wonder if his comprehension goes anywhere beyond the "save file" and "open file" functions. He might as well use notepad. But seriously, most people just aren't interested. They really do just want to "check their email" and browse the occasional website...and that's it. Most people couldn't care less how the thing works, so long as it works when they want it to. That would be fine, if they didn't look so shocked when I present them with a bill.

      --
      I think, therefore I doh.
    161. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Ciaran_H · · Score: 1

      Whether or not you can physically harm it doesn't matter to your average user. The problem is that most people are scared to death of potentially having their computer in a state where it's impossible to do anything with it.

      Wiping a computer clean is not something that the average user will take lightly, because they've never done it and they don't know whether or not they can recover from it. You could liken it to bungee jumping or something similar.

    162. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      The means to properly operate a computer is as far beyond the reach of the average person as is the ability to tune their car and replace the fan belt. It's not that their stupid,it's that the concepts are completely alien to them.

      So when their (windows) computer breaks they can take it down to PC World and pay to get it fixed. What's the big deal?

      Maybe what's needed is recommended service intervals - i.e. the manual recommends you to take your computer to a "service centre" every 12 months and pay for it's annual spyware cleanup, security updates, whatever. This would be exactly the same as a car - if you're knowledgable enough you can service it yourself and you don't _have_ to get it serviced, but if you refuse to get it serviced and it goes tits up you really can't complain.

      Infact this would be better than the arrangement that cars have since most modern cars need specialist equipment to service them whereas the tools you need to "service" your computer are (mostly) freely available for anyone with enough knowledge to use.

      I'm sorry, but I just don't get how people can buy a computer with no knowledge about how to use it and then complain that they have to pay someone with the knowledge to fix it. I'm afraid this is the way the Real World works - if you need something doing and you don't have the knowledge to do it yourself then you pay someone else to do it.

    163. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by cowscows · · Score: 1

      Well, if that's her attitude, then so be it. My mom, however, spends eight hours per day at home in front of her computer for work. She's always emailing me all that stupid stuff from her friends, sending me dumb webcards for holidays, Instant messenger-ing me when I'm trying to spend time with my gf, etc. So she's got no inherent problem with the computer. She just panics when things go wrong.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    164. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Bastian227 · · Score: 1

      The other 5% is when the opposite happens. The user doesn't understand that you need to know EXACTLY what s/he is seeing. Having exact phrases of the error messages gives the tech something to search for on knowledgebases.

      User: An error just popped up.
      Tech: What does it say?
      User: Something about a file not found.
      Tech: What does it say exactly?
      User: [paraphrases error]
      Tech: What does it say EXACTLY?

    165. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always look at it this way.

      All the poorly manufactured hardware died out soon after it was built so only the well-made stuff is remaining today, hence the findings that older stuff is more reliable.

    166. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure what you've been smoking/snorting/injecting, but I'm pretty sure ZoneAlarm doesn't put a limit on the maximum number of connections...

      I've run BT (tons of connections for upload/downloads), FF, LimeWire, and other misc. programs without a problem...

    167. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, this friend forced Opera on the guy, without a word of explanation? Sounds like mighty arrogant to me...

      When I replace Explorers with Firefoxes (which I do a fair amount among friends and family), I always leave a Wordpad note on the desktop explaining briefly and in very layman terms why I did the switch, and I tend to get email back (from completely computer illiterates) saying "Thanks, this one is much better". And that's it.

      They won't miss "the E" if you get down from your high horse to tell them why you kicked it.

      Also, don't leave the Firefox/Opera icon named "Mozilla Firefox" ("WTF? Anime?") or "Opera" ("Some music app?"); bite the bullet and rename it "Internet". It's not an accident that Microsoft's browser is named " Internet Explorer".

      (The matter is simply that a PC desktop is very far from intuitive and self-explanatory; even those things that (start to) feel natural and easy must have been learned beforehand... difficulty using it doesn't imply any kind of stupidity or laziness, just a lack of familiarity with the required conventions. Of which there are a lot.)

    168. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I have in my possession a computer that was killed by an incompetent tech (who has a fulltime shop, so can't be called an amateur).

      The machine kept locking up after only a few minutes. The tech kept screwing with the system, and charged the owner plenty each time (I couldn't convince her that she was being ripped off, either), but the problem continued, and eventually the poor thing got to where it wouldn't boot at all.

      In terminal frustration, she packed up the machine and mailed it to me. I cracked the case, and the problem was instantly obvious: the heatsink and CPU fan were one solid clot of cigarette residue, and the fan had been cooked to the point that its blades crumbled at a touch. The CPU had been so hot that the slot was warped (I had to use Vise-Grips to extract the CPU, I shit you not), the motherboard had scorch marks, and the smoke had gotten out of the adjacent onboard video circuitry. The wonder wasn't that it didn't work, but that it hadn't caught fire!!

      Despite this abuse, the CPU (P3-500) came back to life, was used to upgrade one of my machines, and has been running 24/7 for over 3 years now, 100% reliably.

      But the rest of the system was dumpster material.

      All because some idiot either didn't know what he was doing, or was stringing along a sucker, or most likely, both.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    169. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by sjames · · Score: 1

      The hairs rose on the back of my neck - you can do that from within an operating system?

      It's really fairly easy to do. There's generally a register on the southbridge where a bit can be set to enable write cycles to the chip. Sometimes, another register needs a bit set to turn on the write line to the flash.

      The flash itself is erased and programmed by writing control values to special addresses on it and then readying a byte (register) back to poll for ready.

      In the age of nasty viruses and such, it might be best if the R/W pin to the flash had a physical jumper (off by default), or if there was a second flash enabled by a rescue jumper (so you could at least recover easily), but I have yet to see a MB designed that way (though I've seen a few blades that are).

      The designers just assUme that by refusing to document which GPIO lines to turn on that nobody can figure it out by guessing (a few hours will often be enough to write a simple program to find out by brute force). The natural result is that they make things a pain for those with a legitimate reason to flash and at the same time fail to address the problem for everyone else.

      I've seen several cases where the chipset provided a nice clean recovery method but the pin controling it is left unconnected (must have saved a whole penny on a fairly expensive server board).

    170. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Before the engine got rebuilt, my '78 Ford pickup was very sensitive to fuel quality; I could tell if there was water in the gas, or if the octane wasn't as-advertised (a common problem in SoCal) within a block of leaving the gas station. After the rebuild it lost sensitivity to water, but I can still tell when octane is higher or lower than the sign says.

      I could also tell immediately if the gas being sold was actually of the brand on the sign. Used to be some brands were decidedly better than others, regardless of where I was in the western US. But in the mid-80s, this stopped, and after that it was more a matter of the individual station and who their supplier was (or how much they diluted their premium gas -- yes, some did that). And for the past decade, it's all been pretty much the same everywhere.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    171. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by NuclearDog · · Score: 1

      I suppose I should clarify.

      I was not calling her stupid because she did not know how to use Excel, I called her stupid because she did not ask for help with it and instead left it for 7 months.

      It's perfectly understandable to not know something, but there is no real reason to not ask someone for help with it.

      (Not knowing enough to put together a coherent question is not an excuse in this case. As long as she knew who she had gotten the e-mail from, she could have asked them, or she could have asked anyone else technically competent to look at it and explain what it is.)

      ND

      --
      This statement is forty-five characters long.
    172. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Moofie · · Score: 1

      I find that in the workplace, people are not encouraged to admit they don't know stuff. I am confident enough in myself and my abilities that I have no issues asking for help when I need it, but I don't hold everybody to that standard.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    173. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by NuclearDog · · Score: 1

      Fair enough.

      --
      This statement is forty-five characters long.
    174. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by rawg · · Score: 1

      I guess you'd rather spend $60 on something that would take you 10 minutes to fix. Being middle class, I don't have that kind of money to spend every time I have a problem. I spend the 10 minutes to figure it out and get it done.

      So, no, my time is not more valuable then my money, you inconsiderate rich bastard. ;-)

      --
      The above is not worth reading.
    175. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by Delta+Vel · · Score: 1

      I should also clarify. She didn't look for the link on the network because the prof did not tell her there was one, and she doesn't understand computers enough to think there might be one. She found it by accident. If she'd known there would be a link somewhere else, she would have emailed him back and asked him.

      Sorry, I should have been more clear.

      --
      It's all fun and games until somebody loses an eye. Then it's fun and games without depth perception.
    176. Re:Yeah, wishful thinking, I know. by slasar · · Score: 1

      I agree, it can sometimes be useful to configure the computers hard disk with several partitions, where the active partition is isolated from other areas of the disk that holds the user material. When the machine encounters anomalous complexity the user can simply reinstall the OS. Having said this, the user will need to reconfigure their software-working environment, but if you can work from default with only a few tweaks, things shouldn't get too hairy.

  3. Pee Wee Herman? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember, Pee Wee pulls for Apple :)

    1. Re:Pee Wee Herman? by ettlz · · Score: 1

      Eww!

  4. Um... by rnturn · · Score: 2, Funny

    Pee Wee fixes computers? (Heh, heh!)

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    1. Re:Um... by Donkey5555 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Computer!? You said the secret word!!! AAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!

    2. Re:Um... by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Of course! With all that Internet porn out there just WAITING to be viewed, he doesn't have time to have the thing professionally repaired.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    3. Re:Um... by UnixRawks · · Score: 0

      Sure, ever since he heard about Flash RAM

      --
      I
  5. The reason computer techs are unqualified amateurs by Flounder · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If they knew what they were doing, they wouldn't be wasting their time cleaning spyware off grandma's machine for $12/hr.

    --

    No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

  6. Whoa ... he's got my number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He then flames the whole world of computer repairmen as 'a bunch of unqualified amateurs.'

    I would say he's pretty much on the mark there.

  7. Nope, not buyin' it... by gg3po · · Score: 1, Funny

    Any story by Paul Ruebens has to be met with a certain level of healthy skepticism on my part. :-)


    To the mods: Post is meant to be funny.

    --
    ---
    1. Re:Nope, not buyin' it... by YU+Nicks+NE+Way · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but think about the patina it'll add to his work?

    2. Re:Nope, not buyin' it... by sharkey · · Score: 1

      It'll make his work sticky?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    3. Re:Nope, not buyin' it... by Anonymous+Meoward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Then I applied the Service Pack.... AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH, the Secret Word!

      [insert lots of sirens and noisy things here]

      --
      --- The American Way of Life is not a birthright. Hell, it's not even sustainable.
  8. I for one... by what_the_frell · · Score: 0, Troll

    Welcome our new amateur computer repairman overlords.

  9. No surprise.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I freelance on the side. 95% of the calls I get are in regards to virus, spyware, winsock errors, et al.. usually caused by unpatched IE, or attachments..

    Mr. BBC writer.. how bout a Gentoo or Debian install? Problem solved..

    1. Re:No surprise.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, you are going to install Gentoo at grandmas pc ?

      have you ever installed gentoo? do you know how much time and effort it takes?

      one thing you should know by now, things can and will go wrong and if its hard to grandma to do something or find something, more likely is that grandma is going to skrew the OS and if you dont want to loose much time finding what grandma did wrong to correct it you are going to install OS that you can reinstall in no time and thats WINDOWS

      dont take me wrong i love linux but at this time it is _not_ for the average joe to use at home

      remember just three things:

      home pcs are _not_ in a controled environment
      home users are root, you have to give them the root pwd
      home users _will_ run as root even if you teld them they shouldnt

    2. Re:No surprise.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume that was a troll. Seriously though, SUSE is probably the best replacement for Windows if someone you know is getting sick of it.

      I run Gentoo, and there's no way in hell it's suited to a 'normal' user.

    3. Re:No surprise.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow.. i don't even know where to begin on disproving your fabricated theory..

      first of all.. i have installed, in my life time, FreeBSD, Debian, Gentoo, Redhat, Slackware, SuSE and Slowlaris.. time and effort for that is not an issue for me.. i can have it on your PC at MOST 2 hours.. configured, ready to use for the basic PC user..

      secondly.. i'll let "grandma" use vanilla, KDE or any other wm that will be easy for her to catch on.. why in gods name would i throw her into the console? (i don't even think she'd know how to get into a console, or know what one is to begin with)

      thirdly.. ok, home users won't run as root.. i'll set up an account with certain priveleges.. that's how I make my business? (not to be an asshole, but when you run a service.. grandma will be needing you often)

      and she won't know how to run root.. i'll be shocked if she knows what root is

      your theory, obviously, is flawed.. Linux IS NOT hard.. even for the "average joe".. in case you haven't heard, KDE has been making life easy for a lot of amateurs..

      -p

    4. Re:No surprise.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      idiot..

      read my reply to the other moron who thought i was "trolling"..

      fin

    5. Re:No surprise.. by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


      Another idiot that hasn't installed Linux in the last five years...

      Most Linux distros blow on the machine in less time than Windows and FAR fewer questions asked.

      AND you end up with a limited user account, NOT running as Administrator by default.

      Moron.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  10. get what you pay for by the+arbiter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "a bunch of unqualified amateurs"

    Perhaps if they were paid more than your typical McDonalds employee they'd be a bit better than said fast-food dispensers.

    --
    Boycott everything - they're all trying to fuck you one way or another
    1. Re:get what you pay for by garcia · · Score: 4, Informative

      Perhaps if they were paid more than your typical McDonalds employee they'd be a bit better than said fast-food dispensers.

      I had a discussion with a friend about people in the IT world (I'm not one of them). One works for a large corporation's IT department. He was unaware of SSH, VNC, but was concerned that the wireless router they use in their house doesn't use MAC filtering or WEP. He also has a piece of software phoning home to Toshiba constantly, uses an unencrypted IM client, and gives you a blank stare when you talk about SSH tunnels to a squid proxy.

      In this case the unpaid amateur knows 100x what the well paid IT professional does.

      As long as the market continues to allow that sort of crap to go on the computing world will continue to suffer as a whole.

    2. Re:get what you pay for by Trigun · · Score: 1

      And I once had a front caliper lock up solid twenty miles after getting my brakes checked. You run into incompetence even in a regulated industry.

    3. Re:get what you pay for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a similar case, I was working with another company's IT department on moving some financial data from their company to ours. I was going over our security policies and explaining how our firewall worked with one of the employees there who must have been lowest-tier tech support or something. He didn't understand most of what I was talking about, couldn't come up with anything approaching a VPN on his own, and was amazed at the existance of scp ("Oh, I knew about ssh but I never knew it could send files!").

      When it was all over, I had to wonder what this company was doing with all the financial data before I came along and trained their IT staff for them.

    4. Re:get what you pay for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      if you're so much smarter than him, why isn't he on slashdot posting about how great your job is?

      just because he's ignorant of two relatively niche applications doesn't mean you know 100 times more than him.

    5. Re:get what you pay for by garcia · · Score: 2, Informative

      just because he's ignorant of two relatively niche applications doesn't mean you know 100 times more than him.

      If you're so concerned about WEP and MAC filtering why wouldn't you be using encrypted IM clients, encrypted tunnels for POP auth, and stopping programs you are using from phoning home?

      He's using industry buzz in general conversation but fails to understand how to even minimally protect himself. That's how I know.

    6. Re:get what you pay for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      In this case the unpaid amateur knows 100x what the well paid IT professional does.

      You neglect to mention what he does. Maybe he's an Oracle developer or even a full time *nix Admin. He doesn't know those things you mention because of specialization. He spends 50 hours a week doing his job well, and has done so for 10 years, he lets the Data Security department worry about squid proxies. That is the nature of specialization.

    7. Re:get what you pay for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because ability has nothing to do with employment or position in employment. I can only assume you haven't left full time education yet to realise this.

    8. Re:get what you pay for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on the source of the lockup. Like anything else, internal mechanical failures can happen due to failure that just isn't detectable by a visual inspection.

      Now if your calipers were rusted, shoot the idiot.

    9. Re:get what you pay for by guru+zim · · Score: 1

      Maybe he's not doing anything secure with his IM client and just doesn't care? Perhaps he just doesn't want people leeching his bandwidth on the wireless? Maybe his POP mail is mail home to Mom and has no significance? Maybe he *gasp* wants the Toshiba to phone home. I'm sorry - I'll VPN in to work if I need to do something that actually matters. If I'm sending my mom a cookie recipe, I'm not going to bother with an encrypted tunnel. Also, if I'm asking my friend Pete if he wants to grab a beer, I'll use AIM because that's what he is on. I'll make a note to not send him my Social Security Number via AIM, though. Thanks for that.

    10. Re:get what you pay for by electroniceric · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hear hear! Frankly, if this guy wants guaranteed-quality computer repair, perhaps he ought to look for it first, and see what it costs.

      I do think there's an interesting conundrum for companies in here. In the IT industry, and numerous other engineering industries "repair tech" or any kind of frontline support is basically an entry-level job. Try calling the phone guys to repair your line - inevitably, up shows some guy doing his best to sport some peach fuzz. Not infrequently the guy doesn't know what he's doing and hence makes a huge mess. Worse yet, when he does start to know what he's doing, and up and away he goes, to be replaced by another entry level drone.

      The problem is that this is an important part of the customer's interactions with the company, particularly with long-term contracts. So unless they can figure out how to invert that hierarchy, they're be dealing with pissed off customers forever.

    11. Re:get what you pay for by frishack · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but your post makes no sense. An individual can be very concerned about having people getting access to his local LAN via unsecured wireless. The end result of which can mean having warez/porn servers traceable to his IP(s), and not give a damn if someone intercepts his unimportant messages. I don't send anything confidential or important via email or IM. And having some obscure apps that you have loaded on your machine talk back to their server is a miniscule security risk. You are comparing apples to oranges.

    12. Re:get what you pay for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You truly are an idiot.

    13. Re:get what you pay for by frishack · · Score: 1

      You (obviously the parent poster) are Publicly burnt and are now posting anonymously

    14. Re:get what you pay for by garcia · · Score: 1

      Well, it wasn't, but I'll respond to you here instead:

      This is not a case of apples to oranges. He is obviously concerned about people sniffing on the network (the wireless network is not his). If he was so concerned about his privacy he would be taking steps to stop privacy intrusions which would include encrypted tunnels for everything.

      He doesn't do any of that thus he doesn't understand anything past WEP/MAC filtering (even if he fully understands that). If he was so concerned about his privacy he would turn off the ping/pong from Toshiba. He would likely run a software firewall and stop all incoming and outgoing crap.

      He doesn't care about privacy. He cares about talking in general IT buzzspeak.

    15. Re:get what you pay for by frishack · · Score: 1

      >If he was so concerned about his privacy

      As I stated in the previous message, it's not just a matter of privacy.

      >If he was so concerned about his privacy he would turn off the ping/pong from Toshiba.

      Kindly explain how this is a privacy concern. Dammit, now some toshiba server knows my IP address, my privacy is doomed forever.

    16. Re:get what you pay for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I stated in the previous message, it's not just a matter of privacy.

      You're just trolling now.

      Kindly explain how this is a privacy concern. Dammit, now some toshiba server knows my IP address, my privacy is doomed forever.

      It is when you are so very concerned that someone might catch you sending that information off to Toshiba or watching your IM client conversation. WEP is easily cracked and MACs are easily sniffed. That's not the end all of protection.

    17. Re:get what you pay for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an aside, if you're familiar with how a caliper works, you'd realize how this could happen.

      The rot on the sleeve doesn't necessarily show on the outside, and if your "brake check" didn't include tearing off the caliper and inspecting the slide/guide (which most won't - they just eyeball it) then that's why it failed. Brake check or not.

    18. Re:get what you pay for by DaNasty · · Score: 1

      It's not all about the pay, last week my gramps called me to tell me about a grinding noise he keeps hearing, I told him to take it over to the shop to find out if it's a fan or the hard drive dying. The shop holds it for 4 days, calls gramps back telling him they need to reformat the hard drive for $130 because windows had become corrupted and was making the hard drive squeal. I called them up asking what the SMART status was, and they didn't know what that meant.

      I've run into this many times, it's as bad as the car repair scams you see on 60 minutes.

      --
      Wanna get nasty? - DaNasty
    19. Re:get what you pay for by eldorel · · Score: 1

      Doesn't change the fact that someone who is concerned with mac filtering and wep should at least know what ssh tunneling is. Whether he uses it or not, there are some things that a "IT professional" should be aware of. I've had several situations while working as an onsite repair tech (making less at the job than i did working fast food) where i was called in to repair stuff that a $50,000/ per year (US) Network admin had screwed up. Different companies, different people, same situation, some guy goes to a "computer school" and pays $5,000 for his MCSE, then gets hired over someone with more knowledge, and more experience, but less expendable income. Have even had a call where the company had just passed over me for the job, hired an MCSE, but here I was 2 weeks later being sent out by the company I worked for to recover the exchange server he toasted, and clean up the mess he'd made of the domain server.

    20. Re:get what you pay for by crabpeople · · Score: 1

      " why wouldn't you be using encrypted IM clients,"

      I guess im sort of unskilled amature, but i have never heard of a high encryption version of any instant messenging client.
      im going to go google that now.
      hmm looks like a company does carry this magical product you speak of. oh wait? whats that from their FAQ

      Send instant messages to any other X-IM user

      oh so now ill just convince all my friends to use X-IM. Thanks jerry!!

      or perhaps you meant pssst

      hmm that actually looks pretty nice, works with ICQ and everything.

      I guess ill just roll that ou.. OH WAIT me instant messenging some 45 year old man pretending to be a 18 year old co-ed doesnt really NEED any sort of encryption. MAYBE just MAYBE people should have some secuirty instead of NO security as you seem to advocate with your all or nothing approach.

      This guy, albiet stupid a stupid newbie, knew about mac filtering and WEP on a wireless connection, wich, IMHO is more than yo mama knows about it. So in conclusion: stop ripping on ppl with that tired elitiest low user ID attitude and maybe tonight you will get laid.

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    21. Re:get what you pay for by norkakn · · Score: 1

      Where I am is probably a special case, but I use MAC filtering, but unencrypted IM. (i ssh in and out and email is encrypted) We like our wireless network to be open to whomever, but i ban anyone who is being a pest (causing IP address conflicts.. mainly some people with some crappy no name korean router)

    22. Re:get what you pay for by ticktockticktock · · Score: 1

      Tried out Gaim encryption for Gaim ?

    23. Re:get what you pay for by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Uh where is this company?

      I am an out of work former techie working for 6/hr at an amusuement park while I am going back to school.

      I may not be super experienced but I at least know and have used SSH, VNC, and setup WEP over my WAP.

      I would happy to work for $10/hr until I gain experience because I am desperate and I am A+ certified.

  11. no really poorly written software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wow you come to tell me that poorly written software and spyware is the reason for problems...really i didnt; know that, for years i had come to beleive i just had the bad luck of quarks hitting my computer harddrive crashing it, gamma rays for striking the pentium proc. causing weird things to happen in word...really it was software all this time go figure.

  12. Unqualified amateurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He then flames the whole world of computer repairmen as 'a bunch of unqualified amateurs.'

    Aren't they? Are you suggesting that those drones at Best Buy undergo training?

  13. And yes... by rnturn · · Score: 1

    ... I know this isn't the same guy (or even the same spelling of the last name) but once the mental picture of Pee Wee getting all flustered over spyware had been formed, I just couldn't resist.

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  14. Unqualified ameteurs by tehshen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It seems incredible, but millions of families and thousands of businesses have no-one to turn to but a bunch of unqualified amateurs to fix the most complicated pieces of equipment that have probably ever existed. It's a scary thought.

    Sure it seems scary at a glance (I hire a professional builder to fix my home, I hire some kid down the street to fix my computer) but after a while it does not seem so outrageous. If you're silly enough to download enough viruses or spyware to make Windows not load or your Internet connection stop working, you'd be silly enough to hire an 'unqualified amateur' to fix it.

    --
    Guy asked me for a quarter for a cup of coffee. So I bit him.
    1. Re:Unqualified ameteurs by rmarll · · Score: 1

      Or, if all it takes to fix most computer problems is running a virus scan and purging spy/mal ware why should these people be "qualified".
      When you consider most "service" people will tell you to just re-install your os. Not because it fixes the problem, but "qualified" service can cost as much as the pc.

      Or to put it another way. Fixing your PC is easy. Preserving your data is expensive.

      His gripe about business unable to get "qualified" help is BS. Qualified help is really easy to get, and it's going to cost as much as any other educated employee.

    2. Re:Unqualified ameteurs by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      I think the difference is this.

      People want licensed professional home builders to fix their houses because the homes are worth alot of money.

      Pc's are worth jack. If the value of a pc is $400 why would you want to pay someone 1/4th the value of that pc to fix it? If you call the tech who charges $100/hr twice a year, you could just have bought half a new pc.

      Farther down the discussions here was someone who mentioned who charged $200 and his silly clients pay him $5000-$7000 a year for looking after several pc;s.

      I kindly told him that the customer is an idiot since he could just throw away all his pc's in the trash for the price and frequency of this top tech.

      That is the problem.

      Also its value. A car is essential and so is a roof over your head. Unless run a business a home based pc has little value if its used just to watch porn and browse the web.

  15. At least... by Valiss · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...he didn't try to become a pilot!

    --

    -Valiss
    1. Re:At least... by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 1

      ...he didn't try to become a pilot!
      If at first you don't succeed, maybe you shouldn't be a pilot

      --
      P4HT notebook? And all I've gotta do is get a BankOfAmerica VISA? Wow.

    2. Re:At least... by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

      Or a skydiver. :-)

      --
      Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
      The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
    3. Re:At least... by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      Skydiving and bungee jumping are also not recommended, or anything involving sharp objects. Knife throwing is right out.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  16. I certainly hope by Tebriel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    that we stop getting shoddy articles from amatuer journalists. They have no business offering their opinions or articles. /sarcasm.

    --
    The Blaster Master Fighting for Truth, Justice, and Evil Pie since 1979
  17. Re:The reason computer techs are unqualified amate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    If they knew what they were doing, they wouldn't be wasting their time cleaning spyware off grandma's machine for $12/hr.
    You're right, I charge $40/hr

  18. Who wants to pat for a professional? by qwertphobia · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Folks don't mind paying $50+ per hour for their vehicle repairs, but nobody wants to pay that sort of money to get their operating system de-loused.

    I think that's a major part of the problem. It's hard to make money as a retail computer repair technician, and it's not a fun career. I would guess that the good ones aspire to move away from retail as soon as they are able.

    --
    Never ask for directions from a two-headed tourist! -Big Bird
    1. Re:Who wants to pat for a professional? by tazan · · Score: 1

      That's exactly the problem. The company I worked for gladly payed $60,000 a year for people to work on their trucks and spent money on continueing education. But the guys that work on the computers get half that. The sad thing is nothing much happens if they can't fix one of the trucks. If one of the servers can't get fixed they have a real problem.

    2. Re:Who wants to pat for a professional? by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      I agree with you. People are simply not willing to pay computer repairmen what they currently pay automobile repairmen. It sort of makes sense. Most (l)users can live without a computer. Most people could not easily live without a car.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    3. Re:Who wants to pat for a professional? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      People pay 50+ for the simplest computer services. Doctors, lawyers and regular housewives. When you attempt to explain what seems even the simpelest procedures all but a few remain dumbfounded. People with little money are often the fastest to learn, but most want to be ignorant and pay out the ass. What seems simple to geek types is very complicated for most. People pay 50+/hr to install their wireless and run some spyware, anitvirus every stinking day at least here in Philly.

    4. Re:Who wants to pat for a professional? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's hard to make money as a retail computer repair technician

      The reason it's hard is that if you know what you're doing and are worth $50/hr, you're going to get undercut by the kid down the street who charges $15/hr and doesn't know WHAT the hell he's doing.

      As long as consumers lack the abilities to distinguish between competent and incompetent computer technicians, this problem will always exist.

    5. Re:Who wants to pat for a professional? by John+Napkintosh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Folks don't mind paying $50+ per hour for their vehicle repairs, but nobody wants to pay that sort of money to get their operating system de-loused.

      If only one could reformat/reinstall their car troubles away...

      --

      Long signatures suck.
    6. Re:Who wants to pat for a professional? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is absolutely 100% correct.

    7. Re:Who wants to pat for a professional? by stretch0611 · · Score: 1

      Folks don't mind paying $50+ per hour for their vehicle repairs, but nobody wants to pay that sort of money to get their operating system de-loused.

      If they did pay that much I would do it. The only computers I fix are mine and my mechanics. (My mechanic fixes my car in exchange for my services.) I know what software is on my computer and I tell my mechanic not to install anything and to use firefox (to avoid a lot of spyware problems.) If he started installing a lot of unknown software I would stop our arrangement.

      I agree with the article, when people start installing every program under the sun all problems break out. You need to know what you did to the computer right before it starts running wacky so that you can undo the problem. You need to use common sense to avoid viruses and not to install programs from sites that say, "WIN $10,000 just install this program!!!" Most people do not know what they are doing and the best way to fix their problems is usually re-installing the OS and teaching them how to use a computer.

      --
      Looking for a job?
      Want your resume written professionally?
      DON'T USE TUNAREZ!!!
    8. Re:Who wants to pat for a professional? by 10Brett-T · · Score: 2, Funny
      ...if you know what you're doing and are worth $50/hr, you're going to get undercut by the kid down the street who charges $15/hr...

      Is that how I get people to stop asking me to fix their spyware-laden computers; just tell them I charge way more than the PFY down the street?
      --
      10Brett-T
      Oh, bother.
    9. Re:Who wants to pat for a professional? by Schnapple · · Score: 1
      The other thing is this - it's actually quite rare to know someone who can fix cars. Sure, you probably know of at least one other person who's an amateur mechanic but you probably don't know many more.

      The average person however probably knows half a dozen people who are "good at computers" and they like to pick these peoples' brains at dinner or something. So the odds of knowing someone who would be able to un-spyware your system is much greater. So why pay $50 an hour to someone when your nephew Timmy can do the same thing for cookies?

    10. Re:Who wants to pat for a professional? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm totally with you on that one. Retail computing is really kind of the bottom of the barrel. Almost like first tier support. The less you actually have to DEAL with people, the more you get paid.

    11. Re:Who wants to pat for a professional? by salesgeek · · Score: 1

      Folks don't mind paying $50+ per hour for their vehicle repairs, but nobody wants to pay that sort of money to get their operating system de-loused.

      It's not the $50 per hour - it's the fact I paid $25K for my car and $500 for my PC that is the issue here.

      PCs are at a disposable price point. The only thing fueling PC repair is the value of the data stored on a computer.

      --
      -- $G
  19. computer repairmen? by ack154 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't think he's calling the repairmen amateurs... but the people that joe user ends up turning to. Maybe the kid down the street, or the guy next door who hooked up his own router. Most people don't call someone for PC repair, they just find "someone who knows something" ... no shit that person is an amateur.

    1. Re:computer repairmen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I felt offended by this article.

      I did 3 hours work yesterday for a grand total of £15 - not a princely sum for working on a sunday. After tax and NI, I'll lose about 27% of that. I do my job because I love it, and I think people deserve to get proper service. I don't appreciate it when some 'amateur' makes broad generalisations about an entire industry sector based on his own minimal observations.

      I am a computer technician, but I don't think I can be called an unqualified amateur... I have a BSc(hons) in computer science, 5 years practical experience, two years teaching and MBCS accreditation (soon to be CITE. I'm going in for a PhD this fall, and I'm the founder of project splinescan (www.splinescan.co.uk).

    2. Re:computer repairmen? by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1
      ...Maybe the kid down the street, or the guy next door who hooked up his own router.

      It seems that many people have the expectation that you should do this for free, possibly because so many times they can find somebody who will do it for free, because he's just a nice guy.

      Nobody (not many at least) have this expectation from people who are auto mechanics. Nobody would think to have you come over on a Saturday to tune up his ride, or replace his brake pads.

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  20. Oh come on ... by hal9000(jr) · · Score: 2, Funny
    You mena the local dork that sends his teen age employees out to the sidewalk in chicken suits waving a sign that says "Honk if you hate pop-ups" isn't a profesional outfit?

    My family and friends don't bug me that much about computer problems, but when they do, they know that:

    1. I will treat them with respect
    2. I will fix their problem (usually)
    3. I will give them advise to avoid the problem next time


    And I outside of the occasional meal, I am free. :)
  21. Pee Wee Herman? by Look+KG486 · · Score: 4, Funny
    "Most of the problems I've been called to look at have been caused by viruses and spyware, some by strange software [conflicts], and only one by faulty hardware."

    Fortunately, the hardware problem ended up being a temporary issue.

    --

    "Play is the only way the highest intelligence of humankind can unfold." -- Joseph Chilton Pearce

  22. Amateurs? Maybe, but certainly qualified by saskboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I know people, and am someone who learned back in the mid 1990s how to fix computers, and managed to keep up with current hardware trends to offer service superior or at least as good as a place like Staples, or a box-store repair center could provide.

    In the world of computer repair though, you often get what you pay for. If you're outsourcing your computer repair to the kid down the street, you might get lucky if they're smart and read slashdot, or you could get someone who thinks you upgrade RAM by adding a hard drive.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    1. Re:Amateurs? Maybe, but certainly qualified by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "smart and read slashdot"

      uh . . . you must be new here??

      Or maybe, "I for one welcome our smart, slashdot-reading overlords." I think we've been waiting for more of them for long enough . . . .

    2. Re:Amateurs? Maybe, but certainly qualified by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that would add more RAM though. you can randomly access sectors on a hard drive, and it is memory :-P

    3. Re:Amateurs? Maybe, but certainly qualified by saskboy · · Score: 1

      Touche.

      And are you someone who thinks that upgrading the CPU means changing the case fans, because after all, they are part of the Unit Central to Processing ;-P

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  23. confirms what I've heard by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It seems incredible, but millions of families and thousands of businesses have no-one to turn to but a bunch of unqualified amateurs to fix the most complicated pieces of equipment that have probably ever existed.

    I've always heard that the UK is culturally very hostile to IT. I guess now I know for sure.

  24. People treat their Refrigerators better then PCs by hydroxy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If people went around treating their refrigerators as bad as they did their PCs, then we would have the same problem. Put the fridge in the middle of the street, let people take food, put food in, plug it into a DC power source etc. That thing would break in a heartbeat. However all we do is open/close the fridge and occasionally defrost/clean it. Have someone use their PC to goto ONE website ONLY (ie microsoft.com) with a direct pipe to the site - that computer will be bug free for a while. Maybe even 10-15 years just like my last fridge.

  25. Post-career opportunity by 14erCleaner · · Score: 1
    I found this kind of interesting, even if it just suggests a way to pay for my lift tickets after my next layoff.

    I've occasionally taken a look at some non-technical friend's computer, and I can usually do enough good that they're very grateful afterward (even if it's just reinstalling some DLL so their spellchecker starts working again). Picking up $100/week or so for this kind of weeks sounds like a reasonable hobby for an unemployed techie.

    --
    Have you read my blog lately?
    1. Re:Post-career opportunity by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      I did it in high school.

      It's OK. Not great. The key is to set up a voice-mail only telephone number that is not attached to any land line. The telco can set this up with some runaround, not every person you talk to at the telco knows how to do it. It costs about $20 a month or so.

      If you don't do this, prepare to be constantly bugged by people expecting free phone support.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:Post-career opportunity by boodaman · · Score: 1

      eFax numbers are free, provided you don't mind one outside your local area code, and provide voicemail services. I'm not sure how they work for international numbers, though. I've been using my free eFax number for years as my primary "side job" number.

    3. Re:Post-career opportunity by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      "eFax numbers are free, provided you don't mind one outside your local area code, and provide voicemail services. "

      Care to elaborate? I've used the free efax fax # for a few years but wasn't aware they offered voicemail as well. A cursory look around their website turned up nothing about voicemail services.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    4. Re:Post-career opportunity by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      Nevermind. Just found the answer to my own question.

      Looks like eVoice is the free voice mail service.
      Both efax and evoice are owned by the same company (j2 global communications)

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
  26. Computer Repair(men) by commo1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We really are a bunch of unqualified amateurs. That is, except for a top-level 3% or so (I could be wrong..... I could also be wrong about putting myself in this category). What matters is persistence and continuing research & education (self-taught properly niched persons, not that tech school stuff that is one of the greatest rip-offs and causes of problems in IT today)

    What it comes down to is a very specialized people with a knack for dealing with themundane problems encountered on the desktop today. Server maintenance, network design and upkeep is simple in comparison to the myriad of problems encountered by a low-level desktop tech today, in retail or in a SMB environment.

    The author does bring up some interesting points, however, regarding the difference between car/washing machine repairmen and computer techs..... there is very little one can do to ensure they are being serviced properly in todays marketplace that, at this time, can have no place for certification and the like.... "A+ Certified and Toilet Trained: Equally proud of both." to quote.

    1. Re:Computer Repair(men) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are three categories:

      The two percent of the people that *actually* know what they are doing
      The rest are split into 49 percent that *say* they know what they're doing
      -and-
      the 49 percent that *believe* the other 49 percent.

    2. Re:Computer Repair(men) by C10H14N2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What amazes me is how everyone in IT knows that even some of the most expensive certification programs are bullshiat -- I've taken my share through some of the big guns, like SUN for godssake, and can you say crrrrap? -- but still everyone demands the damned certs.

      There have been a couple occassions where I've been in a slump and just need to pick up some work and would have been more than happy to do basic hardware work. I've been building PCs since I was in Jr. High over twenty years ago, but oh hell no, you don't have an A+ certification... oooh no, can't let you swap out that DIMM, buddy, you're an unqualified amateur. You've got to be fscking kidding me.

      That said, corporate IT departments survive because they can enforce a known configuration where they can just re-image a troubled machine. Consumers, with their infinite and arbitrary configurations insist first on having support cost less than the machine, but also insist on never returning to a known-state. With a vehicle, your mechanic can simply return it to factory specs, generally with no complaints. Everytime a computer tech suggests that, oh hell no, you obviously don't know what you're doing. No, it's just that I have know way of knowing what YOU have already DONE without a point of reference.

      With cheap computers, however, simply replacing them outright is the most logical solution to almost any problem for those who need support. Google, from what I understand, does ZERO diagnostics on malfunctioning nodes. They just pull out the pizza box and toss it in the trash. It's just not cost effective to even bother figuring out what went wrong when just replacing the entire machine is cheaper and that applies to most consumer computers, like it or not.

      But, like with cars, they scream conspiracy. The industry wants me to keep replacing these things!! Well, if you knew how to maintain and rebuild either yourself, you wouldn't have to pay $75/hour to replace a $2 component and, voila, it might be more cost effective to fix rather than replace.

    3. Re:Computer Repair(men) by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      "there is very little one can do to ensure they are being serviced properly in todays marketplace that,"

      Sure you can, and it's where I see a tremendous logic gap in the article's primary contention. You can best assess the skills of a potential service person/organization by word of mouth, and the capitalist effect of doing a job well. I don't care if you have a wall covered with honours, if everyone says you do crap work then no thanks. Alternately maybe you're self-taught from "Computers for Dummy's", but everyone is raving. Come on in.

      If you want someone to do something for you, talk to friends, neighbours, associates and see if they have braved the system, and who they had good luck with and who they didn't. Ultimately this is vastly superior to any paper credentials.

      This technique works both at the individual level, and the organizational level - A firm like Nerds On Site has a serious motivation to ensure that top notch work is done under their banner, and they ensure that they have the right people, with the right knowledge networks, to make that so. They do followup surveys to ensure that customers are satisfied, and to deal with any disatisfaction/training issues. This is the beauty of the capitalist system, and customers have the power of internet communication to make their experiences known.

    4. Re:Computer Repair(men) by saskboy · · Score: 1

      I consider myself a professional-amatuer computer repairman. Sure I've got a degree in computer science, but the field I'm working in isn't programming, and what I do on the job I learned 85% of at home before college even.

      The other week a user had an Outlook Express printing problem. The body and page numbers of the emails were cut off on the left and right margins. It took me a few minutes to track down on google that Internet Explorer's page setup for margins were what was affecting the margins in Outlook Express, and after that had been changed back to .5 from the .2 it was set at then, everything was fine again.

      Would it have been worth me taking a course in Outlook Express and Internet Explorer to have known this rather than look it up? Perhaps... maybe not.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    5. Re:Computer Repair(men) by writermike · · Score: 1

      You bring up some very good points, but I suggest that it's difficult to answer this simple-looking question:

      What's a good tech?

      Your definition -- that of someone who is specialized and continues to self-educate -- I think fits the bill.

      But that's NOT what the market defines as a good tech.

      A good tech, according to the market, is one that can repair a PC's particular problem right now. It doesn't matter whatever if the tech is specialized or highly educated or has certifications. If the customer's problem is an incorrect MTU and five other techs didn't figure that out, then YOU are the good tech for having solved it. The other five are, well, unqualified amateurs -- according to the market.

      A tech can lose a very old customer because the tech tried and tried and tried but, THIS TIME, couldn't solve the problem.

      And, for what it's worth, the market does this everywhere. You buy six Kenmore ranges and the sixth one is bad. Kenmore makes crap.

      You shower a mechanic with accolades, until he can't figure out why your car misses when idle. Then it's off to another repair shop and if they repair it, you bring your car there again and again.

      I do feel, in general, that good techs are, by-and-large, ones that are exposed to a lot of systems over several years, have seen low and high-level stuff, and have come up through the operating systems. This allows that tech to troubleshoot, not necessarily just Google-And-Solve.

      But this is largely lost on the market. To them the computer is a THING and if you know it, you know ALL of it and if you know it you can solve anything. Right?

      --
      If Nalgene water bottles are outlawed, only outlaws will have Nalgene water bottles.
    6. Re:Computer Repair(men) by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


      Now here's an example of brain-dead stupidity - on the part of MS, not you.

      IE's margins affected Outlook?

      Jesus Baron Von Christ!

      THIS is why nobody can get anything to work on PCs!

      Fucking STUPID designers!

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    7. Re:Computer Repair(men) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would it have been worth me taking a course in Outlook Express and Internet Explorer to have known this rather than look it up? Perhaps... maybe not.

      HELL NO! Who would you rather hire to represent your business, some guy who has all the crap memorized from an MSCE course, or some guy who doesn't pretend to be a walking library of knowledge, but knows how to find answers to problems he hasn't encountered before? The later is the mark of a truely valuable technician/engineer. The only times the certs and training are worth anything are when they are done by people who can also do the later.

      And I know that corps look at certs, I'm asking the question as if you, the reader(not targeting the OP), were starting a business and wanted to provide EXCELLENT service? I know what I choose every time. I have an RHCE and I still pass on most "deep" RH work to a true guru friend of mine, who has no certs at all. He's just plain better than me, and since I sub-contract him, we both win and my company ends up looking good because of him(he gets the lion share, he deserves it).

  27. Computers can only add ones and zeros by tburt11 · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Computers are dumb.

    Computers cannot subtract, they cannot multiply and they cannot spell check a document.

    Computers can add binary numbers, and that is all.

    Computer software exploits this ability with some clever logical gymnastics to give us the "Computer Appliance" that we enjoy today.

    This fellow appears to have some difficulty discerning what is a computer, what is computer software, and what is a Rogue Windows exploit.

    There is only one entity to blame here. Microsoft, for producing a weak Operating System.

    1. Re:Computers can only add ones and zeros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Computers can add binary numbers, and that is all.

      I have a Mr. Turing on line one for you. He wants to discuss this Universal Machine thing he's invented.

    2. Re:Computers can only add ones and zeros by tburt11 · · Score: 1
      Odd, I don't see any reference to a Turing Machine in the original article.

      Turing machines are not physical objects but mathematical ones.

      Please mod the AC posts as flamebait!

    3. Re:Computers can only add ones and zeros by spac3manspiff · · Score: 1

      Computers can add ones and ones too fooool!
      Some one carry this guy out of here.

    4. Re:Computers can only add ones and zeros by rewt66 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Insightful? When he doesn't know that CPUs do in fact have multiply instructions, with hardware (for example, funnel shifters) and microcode to implement them? Isn't that CPU hardware and microcode "the computer"?

    5. Re:Computers can only add ones and zeros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adding numbers in binary is exactly the same as adding numbers in octal or decimal or base pi. It's just a different way of representing the same underlying thing.

      And you have obviously never actually looked at low level processor architecture and design if you think that all computers are doing is adding binary numbers and nothing else.

      Of course then again, you could take a reductionist approach like that with anything and say that humans don't have brains, just giant vats of atoms on top of their necks. But it wouldn't prove anything, and neither does this "argument".

    6. Re:Computers can only add ones and zeros by Jck_Strw · · Score: 1

      My understanding was that computers can only do three things:

      -Add numbers
      -Subtract numbers
      -Compare two numbers

    7. Re:Computers can only add ones and zeros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_complete

      Turing completeness is often loosely attributed to physical machines or programming languages that would be universal if they had indefinitely enlargeable storage and were absolutely reliable.

      Every general purpose CPU I know of implements a turing complete ISA within this loose definition. A machine that can only add ones and zeros cannot do this, you need control flow at least. Moreover, most CPUs do a lot more than add ones and zeros, and if you break it down to the most basic level they aren't even adding ones and zeros. Though I suppose you might be able to build a computer out of adders if you were a masochist.

    8. Re:Computers can only add ones and zeros by tburt11 · · Score: 1
      Computers can only add.

      Subtraction is done by ADDING the ones compliment.

      Comparison is done by ADDING the ones compliment and testing for zero.

      Can somebody confirm this?

    9. Re:Computers can only add ones and zeros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to break a computer down to such a small scale it is better to say that computers can do 3 things, take the NAND of two true/falses values, take the NOR of two true falses, or invert one true/false value. All of the other operations are built from that, and several, such as multipliers are built out of adders. For example a wallace tree, the stereotypical multiplier, typically conditionally performs a bunch of additions in parallel. But that conditional logic isn't built out of adders. A wide variety of other bitwise operations are available: shifts, and bitwise logical operations. These don't involve anything you mentioned. And there will often be a lot of other things available. (Branching, though I figured you just forgot it)

      This is all in RISC processors, you should see some of the things CISC processors used to do.

    10. Re:Computers can only add ones and zeros by tburt11 · · Score: 1
      As I recall...

      A cpu chip is a layered silicon sandwich consisting of transistors, resistors and capacitors.

      Two or three transistors are combined to create a nand gate http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electro nic/nand.html#c2 which can be paired to form a nand gate latch or flip-flop http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electro nic/nand.html#c1

      The flip-flop is the basic component of the discreet electronic computational device. It represents either a one, or a zero.

      Three flip-flops, representing the A register, the B register and the Accumulator are wired so that the A and the B register are compared, the results are placed in the accumulator.

      The results of a 0 + 0 = 0
      The results of a 1 + 0 = 1
      The results of a 0 + 1 = 1
      The results of a 1 + 1 = 0 (and the carry bit is set)

      This is addition in its simplest form.

      Repeating this operation over multiple bits, allows an integer of fixed length to be summed.

      Subtraction is handled by a handy trick that is available only to binary. The trick is that if you invert a bit and add, the result is subtraction. This is called the ones complement.

      Computers do subtraction by ADDING the ones complement.

      Multiplication is handled by repetition of the ADD operation.

      Division is done by Repeated Subtraction http://courses.cs.vt.edu/~cs1104/BuildingBlocks/di vide.020.html

      Upon this foundation we build microcode. Upon the microcode we can build an Assembler Language, and from Assembler, we build Perl.

      And yes, in Perl, you can add, subtract, multiply and divide numbers in any base you want.

      Perhaps I should have been more clear in my original post... Computers are dumb. At their heart, they can only add ones and zeros.

  28. this is so timely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a high school student looking for a summer job, I was thinking, "why not repair peoples' computers for slightly less than Best Buy or CompUSA?" $40 dollars to reformat someone's pc or remove some spyware is a lot better than $6 per hour. This article only confirms my belief that most computer problems for people are trivial for someone with an inkling of knowledge. If that doesn't work, just reformat!

  29. Damned Peewee... by dauthur · · Score: 0, Troll

    Well, Paul should stop touching little boys. I've tried working in the world of ametuer pædophiles, and they're all a bunch of unqualified ametuers. They can't do anything right.

    The thing about repair computers, on whatever level it is, it pays the fscking bills. That's really all that matters.

  30. And they also read.... by ericdano · · Score: 1

    And they also read Slashdot. Go figure........

    --
    It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
    I moderate therefore I rule!
    --
  31. Quote from the article ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The phone has hardly stopped ringing ever since and I've had calls from people of all ages, and all walks of life. A few examples: [...]
    • And Helen, a housewife, contacted me because adverts for porn sites kept popping up on her computer screen when her kids where doing their homework.
    Porn pop-ups mysteriously "appeared" when her kids used the computer for "homework"? How strange!
  32. Amateurs? by illumina+us · · Score: 5, Insightful
    It seems incredible, but millions of families and thousands of businesses have no-one to turn to but a bunch of unqualified amateurs to fix the most complicated pieces of equipment that have probably ever existed. It's a scary thought.

    And it's about time that vet starts repaying me for all the hours I've put in fixing his computer. So far the pooch hasn't been ill, but then he only has about 500 parts. But when he does get sick, at least I know I'll be taking him to a fully qualified canine service engineer to be mended, not a local amateur.
    Because the people who take their computers apart, use them daily, and usually teach the tech support weanies are really the amateurs. See to be really qualified you obviously need a piece of paper like the CompTIA A+ certification (most geeks, /.ers, and CS students can take that in their sleep). Yep... unqualified amateurs alright.

    We built our systems, tuned them, made them perform better than they should, kept them virus free, and done it for less than going with a retail box just so we can be called amateurs. Sorry, but only pros can do things like that.

    What's really sad though, is that all you need to do to use a computer and have almost no problems is well... RTFM. =/
    --
    -illumina+us "I put on my robe and wizard hat..."
    1. Re:Amateurs? by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      >What's really sad though, is that all you need to do to use a computer and have almost no problems is well... RTFM. =/

      Requisition The Fine Macintosh?

    2. Re:Amateurs? by iCEBaLM · · Score: 1

      The difference between professional and amature is that professionals do it for money. There seems to be this sense in the world that if you get paid to do something you're automatically better than someone who doesn't and that's just plain fallacy.

      I am a professional myself however I was an amature for a lot longer and truthfully I felt like I knew more as an amature than as a professional because now I am specialised.

    3. Re:Amateurs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Amature"? What's an amature? Let me check my dictionary. Oh, I see. You must have meant "armature."
      A piece of soft iron used to connect the two poles of a magnet, or electro-magnet, in order to complete the circuit, or to receive and apply the magnetic force. In the ordinary horseshoe magnet, it serves to prevent the dissipation of the magnetic force.
      And you're doing that professionally, now? Wow!

    4. Re:Amateurs? by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      Any professional who isn't still an amateur at heart has stopped learning.

      - Unknown, from my random sig files

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    5. Re:Amateurs? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      In the world of PC Repair and IT, there is no such thing as a professional or an amature. You ONLY get labled AFTER the job.

      If you solve the clients PC issues, then your a professional.

      If you fuck up the PC even worse, your an amature.

      And yes, you can be both in one day given you have at least have two clients to sell your services to.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    6. Re:Amateurs? by iCEBaLM · · Score: 1

      They may label you that way, however that is incorrect useage of the words. In both cases since you are being paid you are still a professional.

  33. Cost/value by mgkimsal2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A car is something that gets you to your job, and you invest thousands in (tens of thousands for most people). $50/hour for a few hours isn't all that much.

    $50/hour for 3-4 hours ($150-$200) is often 20-40% of the original computer cost. When Dell is offering $549 packages deals with a flat screen, most people's knee-jerk reaction is that $50/hour is 'too high'. And it is too high, for most people and what they do. If it's related to their work, they can expense it. If it's just an email/gaming machine, they can buy a new one that's faster anyway.

    1. Re:Cost/value by katsiris · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      I'm not one to do this, but...

      Mod parent up!

    2. Re:Cost/value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What about other appliances? I recently had to pay $500 to get my furnace fixed, when the whole thing was probably only worth a few grand.

      Maybe it's not so much the percentage of the original cost as it is the time between repairs (furnace = once every 5-10 years, computer = once every 6-12 months) as well as the lifespan of the appliance.

    3. Re:Cost/value by GoofyBoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > I recently had to pay $500 to get my furnace fixed, when the whole thing was probably only worth a few grand.

      A furnance is pretty important during the cold season. And, depending on what type, you have to do it right or else it becomes a health hazzard. A computer, to most people, isn't that important.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    4. Re:Cost/value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just get a few P4s and you can replace your furnace.

    5. Re:Cost/value by einhverfr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well..... I disagree. And I am in the business. My business offers a wide range of customer services, from PC repair (promotional rate of $40/hr, will go up to $50/hr in September), line of buisness systems, etc. at a higher rate.

      My business is growing pretty rapidly. People will pay for support if they have the option of getting quality assistance.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    6. Re:Cost/value by dlZ · · Score: 1

      I am also in the business, and charge $39 an hour. And my business is growing so rapidly it makes my head spin. Why? It's not because it costs so much to have the machine repaired, it's because people want THAT computer with THAT data and THAT setup (horrible backgrounds intact, etc.) And if worse comes to worse, that want someone that is able to get a complete backup of their docs before doing a wipe of the system. The average home user can't do that, and buying a new system may make them lose a ton of pictures and docs. And I also educate on how to not have your machine come back into my shop. The people that listen, sure, maybe I don't see their machine every 3 weeks, BUT they also tend to come back to my shop when they need new hardware.

      --
      rm -rf ./evidence @ punkcomp
    7. Re:Cost/value by delus10n0 · · Score: 1

      I have no problem charging $50/hr for on-site computer repair services. They're paying me for my knowledge, my presence (coming onto the site), my travel (driving 20+ miles usually) and my experience (10+ years.) If they have a problem with that, I'm sure they can find some underqualified 15 year old to deal with their problem, only to make it much worse.

      90% of the people I've done computer repair work for have no problem with $50/hr, and only a few times have I heard comments on my charges. One old couple said that $50 is almost how much they paid for their machine. Another couple told me they wouldn't have had me work on their computer, had they known it would take three hours (I had even told them before hand it would probably be at least an hour or two to fix their problem..)

      It's also funny to have them get nervous when you show them the legal forms to sign, clearing you of any wrong doing should something happen. I'm not liable for your data loss, your cat dying, your house burning down, etc..

      --
      Not All Who Wander Are Lost
    8. Re:Cost/value by cavemanf16 · · Score: 1

      >> I recently had to pay $500 to get my furnace fixed, when the whole thing was probably only worth a few grand.

      > A furnance is pretty important during the cold season. And, depending on what type, you have to do it right or else it becomes a health hazzard. A computer, to most people, isn't that important.

      Oh really? Tell that to my wife when the home network is "down", she gets a virus that keeps programs from functioning properly, or my all-time favorite: when her HDD started clacking and ultimately died right before I could get all of the 3 yrs worth of Law School documents that she had backed up. Trust me, I may not be getting paid for it, but I've DEFINITELY put in over $1000 worth of work to minimize her worries... and if she had never married me she would've paid for it I think.

    9. Re:Cost/value by BroadwayBlue · · Score: 2, Interesting
      This is ignores the value of all the data that is strewn about the computer. I know many people who can only find files that reside on the "favorites" or "recent" list. And most products are not consistent with where files are placed; the software that came with my digital camera has an insane storage scheme that totally defies logic. Buy a new computer and you throw all that data out. Some people wouldn't notice that it's gone, but others would. There is also the value of time spent reinstalling everything that doesn't come with a new computer, recreating all your personalized settings, etc.

      You should add these hidden costs to the dollar amount you put on the hardware, then compare $50/hr to the final value.

    10. Re:Cost/value by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Yep you got that right. At $549 you are in the same price range as a TV or Stereo. People think it should work like those devices. It should just work for years and when it dies you get another. When was the last time you had a TV repaired? How old was it?

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    11. Re:Cost/value by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1
      If it's just an email/gaming machine, they can buy a new one that's faster anyway.

      Wait. That's a business oportunity! Just like a linen or knife service. I'll come in and swap out your old, malware-infested machines with new, clean ones! Once a week. Every few months, we'll roll upgraded hardware in to the cycle.

      Wait. What do you mean you got important data on those things?
    12. Re:Cost/value by twigstamc420 · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree more.

      It happened as I was leaving work today.

      The receptionist at the front desk began explaining her "slow" computer and problems getting her DSL hooked up to me.

      I told her it would be cheaper to buy a new PC from Dell than to pay me to come out and fix all the problems she has accumlated with Win ME and install a NIC.

    13. Re:Cost/value by adiposity · · Score: 1

      I once charged over $400 to fix someone's machine and rid it of spyware, viruses, etc. (it was unuseable when they gave it to me). This took me quite a while and I charge a fair amount per hour. When they got the bill they pointed out that they could have nearly bought a new computer for that price. I said, "If you wanted a new computer, I could have installed a clean copy of the OS in 45 minutes." Then they remembered that they were paying me to get their (business) *life* back, not a computer with no spyware. The cost of regenerating all that data or migrating it to a new machine would have far exceeded what I charged. And for all his complaining, the guy came back to me when he had another problem.

      -Dan

    14. Re:Cost/value by MatthewNewberg · · Score: 1

      I have had people tell me they have done this atleast twice. It is becoming more of a reality everyday.

    15. Re:Cost/value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep you got that right. At $549 you are in the same price range as a TV or Stereo. People think it should work like those devices. It should just work for years and when it dies you get another. When was the last time you had a TV repaired? How old was it?

      I don't know if you checked out how much TV repair costs, but I couldn't find anyone cheaper than 50/hr, and that guy was shady. I had a less than 2 year old Sony Wega 34" HDTV go out, and it needed a new control board. I paid about 1800 brand new for the machine, and had to pay 450 bucks to get it fixed.

      I sell services for small business and I'm constantly asked by home users if I'll work on their systems. I did for a while, but it's no longer worth my time or energy. Home users bitch and complain about having to pay 50/hr when I drive out to their homes, spending my 2.50/gal on gas, and use my 15 years experience. They constantly call for hand holding(especially the ones who complain loudest about the price) and will often try to make up reasons why they are do a refund in part.

      This guy ruben and anyone else who wants to deal with those people please be my guest. People want to pay me 20/hr to drop everything I'm doing and come out to their homes? YEAH FUCKING RIGHT.

      I know this is slashdot, so there probably aren't any of these types of people in the audience, but just in case: Buy yourself a god damned macintosh next time moron and don't call me anymore. You can shove that 20 bucks up your dogs ass for all I care. Sorry for the flame, but I had to get this off my chest. There is no gold mine in serving home users. If you're lucky, after you get done dealing with the bitching, whining, and the haggling games, you'll make 20/hr and have your Excedrin paid for. That doesn't include your taxes either. Screw those ingrates, let them higher the amateurs who don't know what they're doing. YOU GET WHAT YOU PAY FOR.

    16. Re:Cost/value by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      Actually, that might work if you set it up to have my documents mirrored to a central server on the net, or onto a flash or external hard drive.

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    17. Re:Cost/value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forgot to mention on the TV repair part, I had to bring it to him too. No onsite service available.

      I think part of the problem is the trade disparity. Those guys in China are putting that stuff together for peanuts an hour and then people here think they should be able to get people here to work for peanuts. American labor is expensive. If my cost of living was the same price as the guys in China, I could charge peanuts. But it isn't. I gotta deal with skyrocketing real estate, skyrocketing gas prices, skyrockething. And then people think we charge too much?

      They do this math in their heads... 50/hr = 100k/yr! They're gouging us! But in reality, it's a very rare weak when I even got 20 hours of home user requests per week, let alone 40, and most of the time it was in the 8-12 hours a week range. That's 600 bucks a week tops, = 2400/month. Given that I have to do my own taxes, keep my own bills, pay for the power used in troubleshooting, etc... that isn't worth at all. I've seen jobs at costco that pay more and I don't have to drive all over Gods green earth racking up miles on my car to do it.

      Gold mine nothing.

    18. Re:Cost/value by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      Here is a great example of paying for quality.

      A customer of mine is quite good at doing the amateur tech support thing free of charge for seniors. But she sometimes gets stuck and referrs customers to me. In one case, a computer would crash shortly after startup (Dell Dimension). She tried everyhting she could think of, and called Dell. After spending an hour on the phone with someone in India and being no closer to a solution she called me.

      I arrived and within 5 minutes had identified the problem: The heat sink retention assembly had broken in two places and the chip was overheating. I ordered another part, got it installed, and my new customer offered to buy another hour of my time just to have he help discuss technical matters with them. In the end, they got answered to many questions and have a better idea of things. Yes my new customer is quite technically inclined (a retired telecom switch techician), but I am not alone. I have many customers I get on referrals :-)

      With support, you get what you pay for. If you pay $15/hr you get one thing. If you pay $50/hr you get someone ideally who knows the systems backward and forward and doesn't waste your time.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    19. Re:Cost/value by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      Heh. Actually - that came to mind. But that just means the fresh machines get immediately re-infected by the malware written to the fileserver / attached media. :)

    20. Re:Cost/value by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      ALso you and your family will freeze if the furnace is not fixed. That of course brings up demand.

      A pc used to browse the web is not that essential so the demand is lower.

      Most IT workers always start out as techs. For the parent who said retail work sucks, my job working at an amusuement park is worse. If any tech companies were hiring in my area I would sign up in a second. I have too many colleges here so its hard to find work but anything beats directing traffic for $6/hr.

  34. About his ad by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

    Notice that his ad makes good use of white space, lacks grammatical errors and is generally well composed?

    He should take up journalism or something!

    1. Re:About his ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Helen, a housewife, contacted me because adverts for porn sites kept popping up on her computer screen when her kids where doing their homework.

  35. re: amateurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only amateur is this journalist. What he should really be saying is "Wow! Repairing a computer, removing spyware is complicated"

    He is somewhat right though, pc repair people could be more qualified. Perhaps he'd be willing to pay the costs to have a more qualified person to fix the computer, or maybe those better trained people don't work as computer techs.

  36. Techs ARE unqualified amateurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But slightly less unqualified than users.

    Hence the huge market. This guy seems to be the last to know about all this. Despite the fact that I recommend procedures and fully document everything I do so, customers still want us to do all this stuff, or simply find it too complicated. I find doctors and lawyers to be similarly clueless despite all their training.

  37. The reason by 2names · · Score: 5, Insightful
    most people go to "unqualified amateurs" is this:

    PRICE.

    No one wants to pay $50 - $100 an hour for a qualified person to come to their house and tell them that their computer would run fine if they would stop visiting so many porn sites.

    I have worked on at least 100 home PCs in my lifetime and have not found a single one that was free of pornography. Don't get me wrong, if someone wants to look at porn, that is their business, not mine. But don't get all pissed off when fat-young-heiffers.com loads your machine with digital nastiness that you didn't ask for.

    --
    "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
    1. Re:The reason by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      No one wants to pay $50 - $100 an hour for a qualified person to come to their house and tell them that their computer would run fine if they would stop visiting so many porn sites.

      Really?

      I charge a promotional rate of $40/hr and my rates will be going up in September to $50/hr. I am getting *many* referrals from other customers. Indeed my main problem is that when I fix computers, they stay fixed for the most part, so I only get occasional calls back....

      My customer base is continuing to grow by leaps and bounds both among consumers and businesses.

      No, it is not the case that these rates are too high. You just have to justify the rates by providing great value. When you compare my services with others in my area, one other person charges $40/hr but takes at least two hours to fix anything, and the other charges $60/hr. In both cases, I usually am able to save my cusotmers money. When businesses are involved, the savings are more dramatic.

      Note that the above rates are for consumer-level support. Servers, etc. are charged at higher rate. People like my services, and I continue to get more business all the time. I still have my first 5 customers, and every month, I get at least 3-4 new customers.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    2. Re:The reason by chadjg · · Score: 1

      I've fixed a few machines as favors to personal friends and friends of the family. One old couple has an old 300mhz Celeron that would be working great except for the masses of spyware, adware, and various unholiness.

      This particular couple likes to stand over my shoulder while I work and complain about how the world and the net has gone to hel, about all the horrible porn, and how they are thinking of just disconnecting. The lady does most of the complaining, unsurprisingly. Sometimes it is difficult to keep a straight face.

      This old couple, and most of the other old folks I've helped seem absolutely incapable of understanding the need to keep their definitions up to date. Written checklists, repeated suggestions, and even telling them to leave the computer on every Saturday night so the automated updates can work just don't penetrate their minds.That single move would keep the fat-young-heiffers junk under control, and the old guys out of trouble.

      It won't happen though.

      --
      Why do I have this? I don't smoke.
    3. Re:The reason by rob_squared · · Score: 1

      You can't even trust qualified professionals either. I once went to CompUSA when my PC refused to boot. I built it and wasn't as experience as I am now, so I didn't know how to troubleshoot it well. I paid $100 and they kept the device for 6 months, without doing *ANYTHING* to it. So I said "fuck it" and bought a new CPU/Mobo combo for less than $100.

      --
      I don't get it.
    4. Re:The reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But don't get all pissed off when fat-young-heiffers.com loads your machine with digital nastiness that you didn't ask for.

      Why not? I should be able to purchase pron from fat-young-heiffers.com with the reasonable expectation that the transaction is as described, money in exchange for fat-young-heiffers. Why is it that you fault the consumer here? If Amazon placed nasty ad-ware on your machine after purchasing a book from them how would you feel?

    5. Re:The reason by wcrowe · · Score: 3, Funny

      I haven't done too many home computers, because the owners are just too uninformed about the things, and once I touch it, they figure anything that goes wrong with it after that is somehow my fault.

      One home user I went to had something like 26 viruses and over 100 malware/spyware-related objects on the machine. After spending three hours fixing everything, I looked at they guy's history, and there were hundreds of porn and gambling sites. This guy's wife is extremely religious, and supposedly he is too, so I kept my mouth shut so as not to embarrass him, but I wanted to say, "If you'd stay off the ****ing porn and gambling sites, you'd have no problems.

      That was five months ago. Last week he called me back with the same problems. Same viruses; same malware; same history list.

      Good grief!

      --
      Proverbs 21:19
    6. Re:The reason by 2names · · Score: 1

      Touche.

      --
      "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
    7. Re:The reason by michaelhood · · Score: 1

      In my line of work I'm on every corner of the web each day. I've been using this same XP install since 2002, and only recently (last 5-6 months) have I even installed AVG. I've never had spyware, or a virus on this system.

      What did I do?

      #1. Don't open e-mail attachments that could contain executable code. (Sadly, since MSOffice sucks, this is what caused me to need AVG. Accepting documents from clients)

      #2. Adjust the security settings in your browser-of-choice to prompt on plugins, et al.

      #3. Don't download software from less-than-reputable sites.

      #4. If anyone else uses my workstation (God forbid), I put them on a Guest user, with no administrative rights.

      #5. Oh. I'm behind a $30 D-Link wifi router. Not exactly a PIX, but again, I'm winning.

    8. Re:The reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I have to say, porn sites are not the problem here. For one thing, you can get the same crap from any unscrupulous site, and it's possible to end up at such a site unintentionally. Second, if you are somehow letting this junk in then the real problem is on your end, be it bad software or user ignorance/apathy.

      "Be careful where you surf" may be good general advice, but it is not adequate as a security policy.

    9. Re:The reason by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


      Uuh. the old guy wouldn't be visiting porn sites, would he?

      (Actually that's a joke - I visit porn sites regularly and you know what? Very few of them dump spyware on your system. They don't have to. They know what you want to see.)

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    10. Re:The reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... fat-young-heiffers.com loads your machine with digital nastiness that you didn't ask for.

      your link doesnt work =/

    11. Re:The reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does this:
      I once went to CompUSA when my PC refused to boot

      have to do with this:
      You can't even trust qualified professionals either.

      ????

      I worked at a CompUSA years and years back and let me tell you what experience I had when they hired me. I built 3 computers. Yes, that's right, I was a "qualified professional" by building 3 computers.

      I'm not knocking EVERYONE who works for CompUSA, but they pay crap and many of those guys when I worked there were, like I did the first several months, learning many things on the job.

    12. Re:The reason by Technician · · Score: 1

      I have worked on at least 100 home PCs in my lifetime and have not found a single one that was free of pornography.

      Those professionals fix their own machines. They are too busy to spend looking at other distractions.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    13. Re:The reason by xpyr · · Score: 1

      No one wants to pay $50 - $100 an hour for a qualified person to come to their house and tell them that their computer would run fine if they would stop visiting so many porn sites.

      Yes this is why their are so many "unqualified amateur computer repair people" out their. People realize that for most of them, compared to someone thats qualified, the basics is what most of them know already before they went to college/university.

      That is also why most computer repair places don't guarantee that your data will be saved and to back it up before you bring your computer in to be fixed.

      So your reason for choosing a computer repair person that is not qualified is that compared to a qualified computer repair person, they know all the same basic knowledge. The difference being price.

  38. Of course they're unqualified. by EarwigTC · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nobody with skills wants a market (consumer computer service) with whiny, cash-strapped cutomers who don't think they should have to pay the time and cost it takes, when a better market (business computer service) exists.

    Computers are like other service industries, except that they require a lot more knowledge and care to prevent the problems from happening in the first place. People don't realize that difference, and expect solving computer problems to be like plumbing, with easy estimates of time and cause.

    --
    Promote civility: mod down any post starting with 'ummm'.
    1. Re:Of course they're unqualified. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Why go to university for four years, study your brains out learning cryptography, combinatorics, linear algebra and calculus (for 3D graphics programming), operating system design, compiler design, database design (not just the data structure, but the database management system itself, ie: the product ORACLE), only to have some whiney customer talk down to you like you are an idiot, complain that 'it's still broken' when the next 20 problems they have are (stupid) operator error, have them complain about your skills when it breaks again (they didn't pay attention to you when you talked about clicking on spyware), and have them try to 'get off cheap' because they can get a new system for less, and have them (literally) tell you that you aren't worth the price you are charging... ...and there is surprise the industry is full of kids at $12/hour? Really? Imagine that! I have never ever seen an industry where expectations are as rocket high, and renumeration is so pitiful! It's shameful and disgusting!

    2. Re:Of course they're unqualified. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've done a bunch of repairs for people in my area and I'm A+ certified, and what I've encountered is a bunch of people that tell me "wow it's great that you can do these kinds of things you really should be charging $50 per hour!" and then they give me $10. I don't mind not getting much money because I find fixing things interesting but when I get that, it is kind of annoying. I actually feel guilty taking larger sums of money from people because after a few visits with the money they insist on giving me they could have bought a new computer. Thats only happened once though, usually I just end up with dead laser printers and cd rom drives.

    3. Re:Of course they're unqualified. by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

      Earwig made the most insightful comment, tracking down computer problems is infinitely more complex then most other repair industries, period. Unless you want to reformat, it takes way more time then people are able to pay to fix a lot of computer problems because computer and software complexity are much more complex to repair then any car or house, or plumbing problem. People don't get that computers aren't simple appliances, they require people with insane levels of information akin to "doctors" to track down really complex problems. Computers in closer to human beings in diagnosing the cause of problems because of their complexity.

  39. People's don't like paying for the repairs by behemot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I find that most people are very stingy when it comes to getting qualified or unqualified help in getting their computer fixed. They'll drop a thousand dollars to pimp out their car but won't buy a hundred dollar external drive for backup until all of their business records are wiped out. And its next to impossible to convince people that their Windows systems need regular upkeep, which will come out cheaper than feverishly fixing the systems after they failed.

    I also had a gig providing free tech support for a small non-profit, and when I had to quit it, I looked for a paid support option for them. I have found highly qualified company that would support the network for about $120 per hour on a regular contract. But before them, I have talked to multiple organizations touting only slightly cheaper support options ($75-100) who were utterly incompetent.

  40. Bad economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the last thirtyish years I have seen many people try to start business servicing computers. They almost always fail. I'm not sure why but I can name you at least a dozen around here (city of about 100k).

    What does seem to work is a computer dealership with a service technician. Those do seem to have some staying power.

  41. Paul Rubens? by keiferb · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Pee wee himself?

    In other news, today's secret word is "motherboard".

  42. Re:So True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    For a small fee, I can tell you how to close an HTML tag. This may prove helpful to you in your chosen career as a website designer.

  43. Who you gonna call? by isecore · · Score: 1

    When a domestic appliance goes wrong, you can ring a repair man. When your car breaks down you can call the garage. But when your computer system goes wrong, who do you call?

    People in my city would tell you to call me, since I make a pretty decent living off of going to peoples houses and cleaning up their computers.

    This is essentially a hobby, but people appreciate it and sometimes pays me quite large sums of money (even though I don't really require more than maybe some food or a cold beverage in return).

    --
    I enjoy large posteriors and I cannot prevaricate.
    1. Re:Who you gonna call? by isecore · · Score: 1

      I'm a total moron replying to myself, but I forgot to mention that IMHO I'm not an amateur. I'm NCNE and Mickey Mouse (MCSE) as well as working on my Solaris-cert. If the possibility to get Linux-certified in my area pops up then I'll go that way as well.

      --
      I enjoy large posteriors and I cannot prevaricate.
  44. It's not a fun job. by The+Evil+Twin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sure, there are schools to get certified in Computer repair. But people who get this certification usually end up being the "Amateurs".
    I did computer service work for 4 years while going to school. It was for a consulting firm. I'd be farmed out to different businesses all over the GTA.
    I wasn't great at it. But I knew loads more than anybody and these businesses. After the first service call, all computer related problems were automatically our fault. You constantly had to deal with irate people. No wonder I only made a fraction of what the company I worked for was charging for my time.

    The thing is. I learned this stuff on my own. Taking apart my first computer, perpetually upgrading it, writing my own software, etc. I had an interest. Most people don't. They just want it to work. They want this website to show their video clip, or that file to play this sound clip or whatever. They have no interest in knowing what you should and shouldn't do and how it all works.

    The people who KNOW how it all works usually don't want to do it. I sure don't. After working in computer repair service for four years, I hardly want to help out my best friends let along do it for "someone somebody knows with a problem". And there is the catch. People who know, who are good at it, and who can do a good job, don't want to. It's the Janitorial job of the IT world.

    --
    --- tracer.ca
    1. Re:It's not a fun job. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The people who give the certification are usually clueless as well.

    2. Re:It's not a fun job. by Tripster · · Score: 1

      I'm with you there, I used to troubleshoot Windows for friends and family, not more except for immediate family members and even then they are now quite trained at remaining virus free after the first couple infections.

      On my business side of things I do not offer Windows support outside of very basic stuff because it is just too much of a pain, like you say, after the first visit you are suddenly responsible for anything that goes wrong apparently, even when you've never even looked at the PC with issues, must have been something you did over the network.

      Since I focus more on Linux and run Linux at home I do have local clients who require some Linux admin stuff once in a while, but even those clients still call up with questions about Windows workstation problems, I generally tell them I cannot help them as I don't use Windows at my home office, etc.

      My wife once come home asking about removing viruses, etc. for a friend of hers, I told her at least $100 which resulted in them looking elsewhere, a local shop did it for $25, all the power to them I say since I value my time more than that I guess.

      That local shop though, now they too charge in the $100 range for that type of work, I guess they figured it out after they realized each PC could take 2 or 3 hours to fix at times. At $25 a shot you have the same morons coming back weekly basically.

    3. Re:It's not a fun job. by KC7GR · · Score: 1

      No, it's not. Not by any stretch of the imagination!

      I used to think so, and then got so burned out on dealing with clueless end-(L)users during the day, and keeping my own systems running by night, that I finally said "Screw It!" and went back into electronics.

      Want to know the scary part? Many of those end-users I was supporting were engineers. ME's and Aerospace people, sure, but you'd think that someone who had enough smarts to go all the way to a four-year degree would at least have SOME common sense about their computer.

      In all fairness, some did. But they were in the minority, frighteningly enough.

      I like my work to be fun and challenging. IT, after the first four or so years, was neither.

      Keep the peace(es).

      --

      Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

      Blue Feather Technologies

  45. "Unqualified Amateurs?" by rpozz · · Score: 2, Informative

    Seriously, maybe he should try going to PC World (in the UK), and getting the "Qualified" "Professional" staff there to help him? Many "professionals" are random people with no experience who have been put on some useless training course.

  46. Re:The reason computer techs are unqualified amate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I run 70-85 depending on the client, up your ante 40/hr!

  47. Re:The reason computer techs are unqualified amate by Wizy · · Score: 1

    You're cheap then. The company I work for has 51 of us repairing computers at peoples homes. We charge $88/hr. And we have to much work, we need to hire another few techs.

  48. Re:The reason computer techs are unqualified amate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had over 25 years in the computer industry, and spent a fair part of that time having to do tech support for home and business customers. ("How do I turn it off; it was already on when I started working here.")

    These days, dealing with random members of the public and their constant problems would be the last way I would choose to spend my time; it's bad enough just keeping an eye on family and friends' computers, and most of them at least know a bit about their systems!

    So yep, if they know what they are doing, you'd not find them advertising in the local shops! As we said at work: A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. It was the systems "fixed" by amateurs that gave us the most problems!

  49. Flame? by smcavoy · · Score: 1

    come on, there are TONS of "computer guys" out there that don't know and an IP address from a subnet mask. Or an IRQ from a port address. But they do know how to do a series of things that might make it work, a reboot, a re-install or a call to someone else.
    Of course this has been my experience in dealing with numerous computer guys, mainly outside of big cities.

  50. Has to be said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    damn n00bs. :)

  51. amateurs by Jeff+Hornby · · Score: 1

    So this guy, who is a writer for the BBC by day and who has no formal training puts up an advert in his local news shop as a computer repairman. And he complains about these repairmen being amateurs? Was he looking in a mirror when he said that?

    --
    Why doesn't Slashdot ever get slashdotted?
    1. Re:amateurs by Anita+Coney · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think he was. His point is that we have professionals to take care of our legal, automotive, medical, veterinarian etc problems, but we don't have an analogous professional to take care of our computer problems.

      However, his theory is wrong because such profesionals exist. The problem is that users are not willing to pay them.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    2. Re:amateurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah and while we are at it, let's ask:

      How many of us can put together English sentences just as well as this BBC writer. Half of us? And that being just based on our highschool English background or less?

      Mere amateurs, all of us. Welcome to the real world.

      Professionals are people who are too busy to upgrade their skills.

  52. True That... by jaylee7877 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So this weekend (yep, my holiday weekend) a close friend of my parents needed serious help. Her external drive (where she unfortunately saved all her data without backups) had stopped working. This was her entire business (stupid mistake, but common among end users). She had already spoken to one "IT Pro" who had taken a look, said the drive was completely dead and told her to send the drive to one of those low level recovery services which cost $3000. I took the drive, plugged it in to USB, and copied her files right off. Turns out the firewire connection on the drive had died. This "IT Pro" didn't even have the brains to try a different connection type! When someone tells me they've got a friend or brother or son in IT I assume only that that person is an idiot. Often I'm correct. If you don't know what your talking about, shut your mouth. Don't try to oversimplify or make something up. It makes all of us look bad.

    1. Re:True That... by RainbearNJ · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A few months back, I was at a CompU$A looking at hard drives (they were having a sale on Seagate 160gb at the time), and this poor lady was there with her Maxtor firewire drive and her Powerbook.

      Apple Tech: Sorry, but since you never activated your AppleCare account, I can't even touch your laptop. Sorry.
      Lady: But..? I need my files--My composition is due next week!
      Apple Tech: Sorry.
      Me: May I?
      Apple Tech: Um...
      Lady: Sure!
      Me: *poke*look* Ok--it looks like the firewire port on your laptop is broken (physically). *checks drive* Damn, this thing only does firewire. Do you mind spending $50 bux?
      Lady: Um--no!
      Me: Follow me. *walk 10 feet away to where they have external drive enclosures, grab a USB2.0 enclosure* Here you go. Are you handy with a screwdriver?
      Lady: Yup!
      Me: Ok--use a non-magnetic one, open this case (holding up her old drive), gently remove the drive, and put it into this case (holding up new USB2.0 enclosure).
      Lady: But isn't that the same thing?
      Me: Ahhah! This is USB2.0, which your powerbook does support, and you won't know the difference. It just uses a different cable and it will plug into *points* this port here.
      Lady: You're a lifesaver!
      Me: No sweat. If you have any questions, here's my card.
      Lady: Thank you so much! *HUG*
      Me: You're welcome!

      As we walk up to the front of the store, Apple Tech is still looking all red faced and pissed. Apparently I cost him a sale or someshit. Granted, she should have been smarter, and activated her AppleCare before it was lost (that's an expensive loss too :-/), but he could have at least *looked* at the freaking box to see if it was anything obvious like physically broken hardware. It's called "fostering customer relationships" which these guys have No Clue about, it seems.

      --
      Lucky for me I always have Emergency Pants!
    2. Re:True That... by WinterSolstice · · Score: 1

      I can do you one better... Apple Rep for a certain computer megastore (that has the word 'Comp' in the name) actually tried to talk a friend of mine *out* of buying an Apple.

      She went across the street to the Apple Store, and bought her G5 there, instead. She's delighted with it.

      Always seems to have less to do with "amateur", more to do with "idiot"
      -WS

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    3. Re:True That... by zeet · · Score: 1

      I'm curious if that's entirely legal. The Magnusun-Moss Warranty Act prohibits registration cards for the activation of warranties. Does AppleCare fall under that same sort of provision?

      And yeah, that was bad customer service.

    4. Re:True That... by sammy+baby · · Score: 1

      I don't believe that it does, although IANAL. AppleCare is an extended service contract that goes beyond the base warranty on the device, and can be purchased independently.

      On the other hand, if the PowerBook were less than a year old (and since it had a USB 2 port, it almost certainly is), it should be covered under the base warranty anyway. AppleCare goes to three years for PowerBooks.

    5. Re:True That... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's computer tech shit, not an IT Pro's area of expertise at all. IT Pros underlings to take care of that stuff. I'm a horrible, horrible tech and I know it. I do alright in IT.

      That said, I probably would have caught that one.

    6. Re:True That... by Xugumad · · Score: 1

      Had something similar myself once; someone at work's harddrive stopped working. IT service said it was dead, nothing they could do, so I picked it up and plugged it into a spare computer. It worked okay, turned out what had happened was the partition table had been fried. Which Knoppix fix, yay Knoppix :)

    7. Re:True That... by oolon · · Score: 1

      While he might look pissed because he didn't solve the problem and looked like an ass (quite rightly). He should thank you because he did make a sale of the encloser you used it. It was not like you stole the customer right out the store, you even asked permission however i expect they did lose future business from her.

      James

    8. Re:True That... by RainbearNJ · · Score: 1

      Another fine tool is found up at http://www.ubcd4win.com/ (Ultimate Boot CD 4 Windows). I have a lovely WinXPSP2 bootable CD with tons of tools, including my registered copies of GetDataBack/DriveExplorer from Runtime Software (Yeah it's not cheap, but it's cheaper than most similar software, and in my case, seems to work in 90% of the situations I've found myself in. Couple that with a decent-sized HD in a USB enclosure, and you can restore most people's data in a few hours.

      (Actually I'm booted off that CD right now, running K-Meleon and reading /. and my email waiting to copy some stuff from one drive to another.. :) )

      --
      Lucky for me I always have Emergency Pants!
    9. Re:True That... by RainbearNJ · · Score: 1

      AppleCare is a package you buy to extend your warranty. You have something like 90 days after purchase to activate it, or it's assumed to be lost/stolen/whatever, and then you're S.O.L.

      --
      Lucky for me I always have Emergency Pants!
    10. Re:True That... by SirCyn · · Score: 1

      The two things that always get me:

      1. People who are afraid to say "I don't know". I tell people this all the time, because I really don't know. I get someone asking about XYZ software that I've never used, I'm not going to lie and make something up. People will respect you much more for simply telling the truth.

      The wisest IT or IS person knows when they do or do not know. When you know, step up. If not, shut your pie hole!

      2. If you can't do all of these: Assemble a computer, install OS and software, troubleshoot said software, write a program, debug said program; then you are not "into computers".

      I know far too many people who have children who are "into computers". No, they like to play games, and tinker. This does not qualify them as a reference.

      Just look at the finishing rate of college CS, CIS, and other computer degrees. I started one class with 40 people, by the end we were down to 3 (including me). Those 3 were "into computers", the other 37 had delusions of computer systems being simple, easy, or something...

      Speaking of IT and IS, there is a difference and I'm sick of hearing people claim to be in IT but don't work with the hardware. If you work with the computer system then you're in Information Systems (IS); if you work with hardware than your in Information Technology (IT). Don't get them confused!

  53. Nobody wants to help the stupid by LibertineR · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Anyone who has gone through the grief of setting up their computers/networks to run reliably and consistantly is not about to waste time helping someone not inclined to learn, to maintain a computer.

    Who wants to get roped into answering the phone at all hours from someone who cant figure out how to avoid a virus or worm? I wont answer that call from anyone. Get WebTV and shut the fuck up.

    You cant pay me enough to swing by in the middle of my day to remove porn-popups, if you are gonna keep using IE, and not reign in your 13yr boy with a perpetual woody.

    I dont care if you have a pair of 44Ds in your blouse, I aint fixing your machine unless you are prepared to sit on my lap while I load my "Spybot".

    1. Re:Nobody wants to help the stupid by Schreckgestalt · · Score: 1
      I dont care if you have a pair of 44Ds in your blouse

      Funny. Last saturday, I had my 'first date' with a new girl. She's so cute. And I told her about all the annoying people who call me to fix their computer problems... Then she said "So, you're not going to help me on my problem, then"?

      D'Oh!

    2. Re:Nobody wants to help the stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit, have you ever even SEEN a real live female breast you didn't pay for? I don't want anything with a 44D chest sitting on me. I draw the line at about 40, and that's for a naturally big girl. 44 is just....ugh.

    3. Re:Nobody wants to help the stupid by LibertineR · · Score: 1
      You need to re-eval, bud.

      If a gal is tall and broad like a swimmer, 44Ds are not that far out of the mainstream. Not that I prefer a lot of back meat, (TMI, I know)but 44Ds aint THAT big. Now, when you get into the EE and F range, now THAT is big.

    4. Re:Nobody wants to help the stupid by LibertineR · · Score: 1

      Dont help ANY woman with her computing issues until you know whether or not she can cook. Anything else can be taught, but if a woman can fuck up a meal, she will never improve.

  54. BBC writer tries by infiniphonic · · Score: 1

    "The simple truth is that although computer systems are sold as consumer goods like fridges or washing machines, there's no computer equivalent of a qualified service engineer who you can get to come around and fix things" I thought that was what A+ certification was all about.

    --
    Crisis is the rule, not the exception.
    1. Re:BBC writer tries by Col.+Blackwolf · · Score: 1

      Then you've obviously never seen what you need to know to get an A+ cert. I used to fix the computers that the A+ students broke when I worked at the lab in school. Believe me, A+ by itself doesn't mean much. My computer savy nine year old cousin could get certified.

    2. Re:BBC writer tries by infiniphonic · · Score: 1

      Mabey it is time to introduce some new standard of training for base level repairmen or women that do, or want to break into doing this kind of work?

      --
      Crisis is the rule, not the exception.
  55. Well put. by kaos.geo · · Score: 1

    He is speaking out of frustration....
    I really can't blame him....After 5 years as tech support I know where the frustration comes from, :P

    (I hope there is no way to mod this as "Pathetic"!!)

  56. Cowards where I live... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My local computershop repaired my computer, which I bought used from them, twice. The first time because of a burnt motherboard... The second time because of a burnt motherboard... The second time they also said that the cpu was "damaged".

    The weird thing was: When I gave them the computers they smelled but worked. When they had examined them they didn't function at all. Amateurs? I really think soo... They broke my beloved computer!

    1. Re:Cowards where I live... by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


      What's that George Bush line?

      "Fool me once...shame on me...Fool me twice...won't get fooled again?"

      Or whatever...

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  57. you only need one tool to fix computers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And it's called knoppix. memtest to test ram, badblocks to test the physical disk. When spyware destroys your windows, you boot up, move your files to your friendly local linux-admin neighbor's ftp server, wipe the whole thing with fdisk, and then boot up with your Windows CD (only to repeat the process 2 months later when you are once again overrun with spyware).

    Or you can just install Debian, learn what you're doing, vacuum all the dust out of your box occasionally, and stop worrying.

    1. Re:you only need one tool to fix computers... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      I heard you need two tools: A Phillips screwdriver and the ability to read the fucking manual.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    2. Re:you only need one tool to fix computers... by Reignking · · Score: 0

      And the reset button! Rebooting the computer fixes everything!

      --
      One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
    3. Re:you only need one tool to fix computers... by turnus · · Score: 1

      That's just not realistic. If you even get a manual with a retail store computer these days it tells you nothing about repair -- other than dial the toll-free number. The goal should not be to make everyone experts on their computers, VCRs, cable boxes, washing machines, etc. The goal should be for computers, appliances, and software to be simple and robust enough that you DON'T need to RTFM. The problem is in the design and interface, not with the end users.

    4. Re:you only need one tool to fix computers... by infiniter · · Score: 1

      Amen! That's all I ever carry for basic maintenence. One Phillips-head screwdriver and the realization that no matter what the customer says, the problem is spyware.

    5. Re:you only need one tool to fix computers... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      There is this human concept called "humor." I think you should look into it.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    6. Re:you only need one tool to fix computers... by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


      Now THAT'S what you REALLY need to fix PCs! Humor!

      And I'm real bad at that - I get pissed instantly when dealing with stupid technology (which is just about everything in computers.)

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    7. Re:you only need one tool to fix computers... by turnus · · Score: 1

      Or, perhaps you should work on your delivery.

  58. Re:The reason computer techs are unqualified amate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If that was some kind of sexual innuendo, you're a sick bastard.

    Cheap, too

  59. PCs by their definition require amateur support by defile · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When I sit down in front of a Linux server I can whip out super professional tools like strace and ltrace and lsof and dig through /proc, whip out gdb, etc. and follow everything step by step through the source code. Everything's usually simple enough that I can fit the entire system in my head and see where the broken piece is (except for PAM). The system invites me to do this. I can diagnose problems scientifically, professionally, and quickly.

    When I sit in front of a Windows box, with some exceptions, all I can do is push the same set of buttons that the user has been pushing, and see if I can find a combination that works.

    PCs force me to become an amateur. Reason: bad tools available.

    1. Re:PCs by their definition require amateur support by jimicus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Reminds me of a thought I had some years ago.

      They say "a bad workman blames his tools".

      I say "a good workman doesn't use poor tools in the first place".

    2. Re:PCs by their definition require amateur support by benjamindees · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ding. I declare you the winner for this story. Congratulations. For the rest of you: keep hitting refresh and maybe you'll win the next one.

      Seriously, though, this is why I charge more for Windows support than for Linux. It's degrading to spend a couple of hours clicking buttons almost at random and when you've discovered the problem, get told "That was easy!" or "I could have done that!"

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    3. Re:PCs by their definition require amateur support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, even the fact that Windows doesn't give you a lot to work with wouldn't be so bad if the Windows system logging didn' suck so bad. Even if I don't know how to fix a problem on Linux, I can usually look up the error on Google and find the fix.

  60. unqualified amateurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He knows what he's talking about.

  61. He's right on the last note by Nijika · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Just like anything else, you've got a dozen guys who fell out of some 3 day course who are advertising themselves as the new Turing, and you've got maybe one out of that dozen who actually cares enough to be competent. They can all come from the same course, and know the same stuff, but the difference is in what is delivered and how.

    The problem isn't completely with technical incompetence, the problem can just as easily and will more probably be with care and respect for the customer.

    It's a service issue, not a knowledge issue most times when you run into a computer tech who seems to be bumbling something up. Did they check to see what the problem actually was? Do they care enough if they're only making $7-10 an hour from their employer to save your enterprise business plan or presentation? Probably not.

    Actually the whole thing is a lot like having a car. You can go through a bunch of different mechaniacs who are either dishonest or lazy, but once and a while you find that one shop where they're commited to service. I don't know about you, but I end up holding on to that shop's business card like it's solid gold. And that's an industry where there are standards to meet. I pay more for better, and I'm always happy with the result.

    So WE as computer techies are to blame for this attitude in non computer techies in two ways; way #1, we undervalue ourselves and in turn make the work we do less valuable. #2 we don't do the work properly because we don't respect it ourselves.

    Actually come to think of it, as a freelancer, I'm not competing with these low-balling stained-shirt wearing Linksys cablemodem router admins anymore, I'm going to set my rates accordingly. //more of a rant than I wanted that to be.

    --
    Luck favors the prepared, darling.
    1. Re:He's right on the last note by cavemanf16 · · Score: 1

      So true. In fact, before I started leasing cars I had a used Eagle Talon Tsi. (turbo AWD - so lots of moving parts and problems while I had it) I took it back to the dealership twice for some extended warranty repairs - they always sucked and had HORRIBLE service. Took it one time to the shop I will always go back to for car repairs now:

      The car kept killing batteries. After two batteries and two strandings at friend's houses due to dead batteries I knew it wasn't the alternator or battery problems. Took it to this car shop and told them all about how it still wasn't holding a charge for more than a few months at a time. (They had already tried to fix the problem in the past) One of their technicians after checking every electrical connection noticed that the dome light was acting funny when he opened and closed the door. (I had never even noticed it) Turned out that there was a short in the dome light, which after fixing it caused my car to be cured of that problem! (Did I mention the shop only charged me for the parts since they didn't fix the real problem the first time - THAT is service!)

      MCSE's and ITT Tech. "technicians" will always be the car dealership repair shops and uncle freddie's car fixit shops - unless they're only getting the certification to impress some higher-up idiot. The true "IT Repair People" will continue to be those of us who have a passion for knowing all we can about a tool - and how to fix it when it gets broken.

    2. Re:He's right on the last note by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      "(Did I mention the shop only charged me for the parts since they didn't fix the real problem the first time - THAT is service!)"

      That's really excellent service.

      I have a business client who likes me because I spent four hours trying to determine why his SCSI scanner wasn't working before concluding that either the SCSI board or the internal electronics were dead. I didn't charge him for those four hours because my policy is "no fix - no charge" - and I couldn't PROVE the machine was dead. If I'd had some utility which could tell me the SCSI board was dead or the scanner was dead, I could have charged him. My problem, though, not his.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  62. Well... by Robotron23 · · Score: 1

    This journalist appears to have set a blurry line as what constitutes a "repair... as we all know the most common reason computers tend to break is because they are either deluged with adware/spyware or if they've become infested with a virus.

    Instead of emphasizing these facts, the guy just natters on about his advertisement, the intensely complex nature of computers (backing it up with little evidence, typical journo) and the huge amount of consumer demand there is (oddly, he backs this up quite extensively). If anything this article is more inclined to the business itself than the "cowboys" who profit from it,

    By the end of the article, hes become pedantic and I daresay sardonic, if anything such an article encourages the "cowboys", indeed, even this guys very point is inane.

    I mean, so what is computer repair is a lowly skilled job which doesn't happen to require a degree in computer science? If the job is done well, and the "cowboy" gives you some advice about preventing your computer breaking further, then what computer owner in the right mind would give a flying feck about his qualifications?

  63. Amateurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a bunch of unqualified amateurs

    No kidding. There's a reason so much of the world runs a crap operating system and crap applications.

  64. "when her kids where doing their homework" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It looks like the BBC writer didn't do his own homework in English class.

  65. Fair price? by LordNimon · · Score: 1
    They need someone to come round promptly to fix things so they can get on with their business, and they're prepared to pay a fair price for the service.

    Is $50/hour a fair price?

    --
    And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
    To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    1. Re:Fair price? by Charcharodon · · Score: 1
      This is why I stopped working on computers, because most of the time people expect it for free or near free. The look at you crazy after you spend half the day get them up and running again (I freakin hate Dell's) it's like you are trying to rob them. Even working on PC I've built for others.

      Please stay off the porn sites, back up your files and your pictures, write down your passwords and login info, flash games & software is not free don't install any claiming to be so, do not download any desktop themes, don't click on pop ups, update your virus checker and resubscribe when it expires, clean out the dust once in a while, and for God's sake leave the damn firewall on and don't turn the auto updates off.

      6 months - year later they've done everything just the opposite and are looking for me to save all the files they can't live without.

      My mom is on her 3rd computer and finally does the above religiously. I guess after lossing 2 years worth of grandchildren's pictures finally made her see the light. (I had them backed up but I made her sweat it out for a while before I gave them back to her.) A properly set up computer will work just fine for years, it's typically the keyboard & mouse actuator system that is faulty.

    2. Re:Fair price? by FuzzyDustBall · · Score: 1

      No 100 - 150 dollars an hour is a fair price... I was a professional computer tech for 2-3 years. The company I worked for charged 100 dollars an hour for standard non networked computers to be fixed, and 130 an hour to fix network problems. I have since moved into programing but I do work on the side sometimes, I charge 100 an hour any less would not be worth it to me (I might as well do it for free which I do for friends/family). Those few clients I have worked for call me back when they get in real trouble and are always happy with my work. Thats how I like it.

    3. Re:Fair price? by clickster · · Score: 1

      Yes. I charge $75 for the first hour and $50 for each additonal hour (in 1/2 hour increments). If I call a plumber or HVAC guy, that's about what I pay. A licensed electrician is far more. A mechanic is more. I pretty much try to put my prices just below that of most other "come to my house and fix my stuff" kinds of jobs. If I know the person and they drop it off at my house for me to work on over the course of a couple of nights, I will of course drop the price because I'm working at my convenience while I watch TV, etc. (or work on 2-3 peoples' PCs at once). Sure there are people who will do it for less. But I'm good at what I do (not trying to be arrogant, I just get the job done) and I stand behind my work. I don't think $75/$50 is that much to ask.

      P.S. I live in Oklahoma where the cost of living is pretty low compared to the rest of the US.

      --
      If you mod me down, I shall become less powerful than you could possibly imagine.
  66. did anyone even read the article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because if you did, you would have noticed this is from:

    "Dot.life - where technology meets life, every week
    By Paul Rubens"

    what the hell is dot.life and why is it on slashdot? who the hell cares if some guy thinks he's the first one to do side work because people don't even want to attempt to learn how to use their computers?

    this article should not be on slashdot, it's basically this guys frickin blog, it's NOT ABOUT ANYTHING@(#)

    FOR SHAME TIMOTHY

    1. Re:did anyone even read the article? by smithtodda · · Score: 1

      You're new here, aren't you?

      --
      Why Vegan? No other food choice has a farther-reaching and more profoundly positive impact on all of life on Earth.
  67. Re:Yikes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably because Paul Reubens' is paria in the U.S. after the pedophilia case against him...

  68. Jupiter is the name of the lander... by Behrooz · · Score: 1, Funny

    Jupiter is the name of the lander... ...the actual landing site is in my backyard, and I assure you, it is indeed rocky. Noisy and tough on the garden, too.

    --
    "We have to go forth and crush every world view that doesn't believe in tolerance and free speech." - David Brin
  69. Qualifications are overrated by eno2001 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've met plenty of people with qualifications (computer science degrees, various certifications, etc..) who couldn't fix the simplest problems or don't even have an understanding of the most basic aspects of the systems. On the other hand, I've met other people who are more than capable and don't even have a college degree or a certification. The bottom line is this: If a person can fix the problem and provide you with an exact description of what caused the problem, and they can reproduce their results, they have the only qualification they need. (ie. they know what they're doing)

    The biggest mistake that a lot of people make is thinking that computers are a business. They aren't. They are a technology and therefore you need technologically savvy people to work with them. I have no formal training at all, but most people I know always come to me for help because they know I can figure out and solve any software or hardware issue on a PC. I think it helps that I have a non-formal background in electronics first. I, generally, know how the circuitry works at the hardware level. So it's very easy for me to rule out hardware problems before I explore the software itself. Many times, I find that the culprit is too many apps that are stomping over each other.

    When I was a Windows guy, it didn't take me long to discover that most of the instability in my system was caused by all the extras I loaded on for convenience. This was an alien experience to me as it wasn't that way in the Atari ST world I migrated from. I didn't like it, but I wound up finding that the best way to run Windows was to keep it lean and pretty plain vanilla. If I wanted extra apps, I always went for Microsoft products because they usually worked the best with Windows. Norton stuff was very cool, but resulted in a lot of instability (this was Windows 3.1). Then I got sick of having only one place to go shopping and moved to Linux. All problems solved...

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    1. Re:Qualifications are overrated by NevarMore · · Score: 1

      "I've met plenty of people with qualifications (computer science degrees, various certifications, etc..) who couldn't fix the simplest problems or don't even have an understanding of the most basic aspects of the systems."

      Of course you'll find computer science people who can't fix PCs because computer science is NOT about PC repair. The day-to-day maintentance, design, and setup of end-user hardware, servers, and networks is an IT/IS issue.

      A computer science major should be able to outline the concepts of the design and implementation of the software on a computer, know a little bit about the hardware architecture, how the OS handles events, understand the structural differences of programming languages, etc.

      CS and IT/IS overlap in many areas, but the two fields are very different and serve different purposes. The difference is as simple as looking which colleges offer degrees, CS is usually part of an Arts&Sciences while IT/IS are part of Buisness. Both are very important and useful, but they are no more alike than a lumberjack and a carpenter.

    2. Re:Qualifications are overrated by eno2001 · · Score: 1

      IT/IS should be part of engineering. It has no business being in a business college. Most of the business folks haven't a clue about how to manage PCs. If anything, the person working on a PC should have an engineering background. When I was in college and considered going into IT/IS, I was shocked at how business centric it was. There was more concentration on the basics of using the OS and the applications than there was on circuit design and electronics. Knowing how to point and click is not something that should be taught to people who are going to be working on your computer. They should almost instinctually know that. But that is what is being taught in many IT/IS courses. Knowing how to edit the Windows registry and various config files, filesystem structure and layout, and the way all electronic components of your system operate are what should be taught. None of these things are taught in business colleges. That's why support folks suck so bad.

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    3. Re:Qualifications are overrated by Seft · · Score: 1

      Norton stuff still results in instability :)

    4. Re:Qualifications are overrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you want a surgeon who didn't have a "college degree" or "certification", but claimed to be "more than capable" ?

    5. Re:Qualifications are overrated by eno2001 · · Score: 1

      No. But home computers and most office computers aren't a matter of life and death. If they are, then I damn sure don't want them running Windows. When my wife was going in for ultrasounds during her pregnancy I noticed that the ultrasound machines don't run Windows. They were done by GE and appeared to be running a black box OS, which is fine by me because it means that GE is taking full accountability for the use of their equipment. I wouldn't be surprised to find that their OS might be based off of Unix though... Most mission critical systems are. So... stop trolling.

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    6. Re:Qualifications are overrated by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      Look for people who got their IT/CIS/IS degree from a college in applied science + technology. Especially ones like RIT or Buffalo State(similar degrees, way different schools, but to show it doesn't have to be a private school).

      They both (and RPI etc...) have classes in programming concepts, Linux/Windows networking and administration, Project Management + Systems Anaylsis, OS design, Networking concepts from the signal on the wire + using a Fluke to packet constructon to Router config.

      People who can pull out Etherial or netstat or the like to troubleshoot network problems are better than those who don't know packets exist. People who know about crimping cables might check the "home made" cable before messing with the firewall.

      Of course, YMMV.

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    7. Re:Qualifications are overrated by toddestan · · Score: 1

      The thing with computer science majors is that I would expect them to be in computer science because they have an interest in computers. Thus, they have played around with them some, and know a thing or to, despite the major actually being a bunch of abstract theory. This was mostly true until a few years ago.

      But many of the current crop seemed to have chosen computer science just for the money, and don't know squat about computers. For example, I have had to help computer science majors in my school reinstall Windows. This wasn't something like tracking down some obscure driver conflict. I'm talking people who don't even know where to start.

    8. Re:Qualifications are overrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > They are a technology and therefore you need technologically savvy people to work with them

      Car is a technology. Refrigerator is a technology. But we don't normally go to a savvy amateur for repair. This argument is flawed.

      The basic tenet of the problem is that the PC software was never designed properly to be maintainable in a consistent manner. New software with inconsistent GUI, new bugs, etc. only make matters worse since only those who experienced and solved that particular or related problem can fix them, but no one can become an expert in overall maintenance, since every problem is ad-hoc due to irregularly complex problematic design of the softwares, not to mention dealing with every different versions of each software, especially when they tend to have very inconsistent interface between versions.

      At least in other technologies, the manufacturers design things that are consistent across versions, use components that can be replaceable, etc. so that they can create certification for a person to learn and train themselves without spending too much time on too many things or replacing old knowledge too fast.

      Once computers, especially software (hardware is actually becoming very componentized and easily replaceable) becomes well designed like other technologies, we will have certified software technicians who can learn and train themselves to help repair software problems within a reasonable amount of time without becoming obsolete too fast.

      > I've met plenty of people with qualifications (computer science degrees, various certifications, etc..) who couldn't fix the simplest problems

      This is precisely what I mean. Some problems look simple to someone only because that person encountered and fixed the problem, and understood the underlying principle in the process. That doesn't mean someone else who had credentials weren't capable. That person may not have encountered the problem earlier to see through the principles, and may actually find better fix for not just that problem but other related problems, with better knowledge than the former person given the time and the problem, but probably didn't bother to think about the problem too deeply.

      > the best way to run Windows was to keep it lean and pretty plain vanilla

      This is exactly the testament that shows how the software was designed. If you look at other well-designed software, no matter how many softwares are loaded as complicated interconnected processes, they still behave very reliably, even to the point of replacing processes on the fly without affecting overall system activity.

      When computers become very fast, so that software can be componentized with fault-tolerance in each component without losing performance, with standard interfaces for easy replacement, we will begin to see computers becoming similar to the type of robust technology as cars.

      But so far, we don't have that (or at least companies don't want that, just like in the old days when a few car companies had all the market for themselves.)

    9. Re:Qualifications are overrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But so far, we don't have that

      I beg to differ. We've had that for nearly 20 years in the Unix OS. And it's far better today than it was when Windows was starting. Look deeper and you'll see that the developments that matter today are happening in the Unix world.

    10. Re:Qualifications are overrated by NevarMore · · Score: 1

      I understand where you're coming from, but I still disagree somewhat.

      IT majors may have an interest in computer science, many can write good scripts and utility programs, but they are certainly not (or should not) be expected to know how to design and implement a large program. The inverse is true for CS majors, they should know how to handle large programming projects, but designing networks and PCs is not what they really do or were taught.

      My father is a good example, he's currently the top MIS manager for a fairly large company and is approaching retirement. He has been designing and writing code for mainframe systems (mostly AS400's) his entire career. He can talk to me about code design and the nuances of various languages. He can design and implement massive programs, but he stil has to call my brother (a comptuer geek who went on to get an IT degree when it was a new field) or I when his home PC borks up. The PC on his desk at work is a tool to do his job, and it is as far removed from the focus of his task as the guys upstairs in HR and accounting.

  70. A bit of reality- by DaFrogg · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I have been in professional pc repair for 14 years, and I can honestly say he's missed a big point. While most problems are fixable by the user, most don't seem concerned enough to learn the basics and try it. While I wouldn't expect every home user to know all about their machines, I have dealt with businesses that are staggeringly, and proudly, computer illiterate. Then when you do that thing (found on page 12 of the manual) that fixes it, they give the same classic line : "I could have done that! Why should I pay you?" They'd rather call someone else to deal with it. This same principle keeps all those oil change places running! But, hey, as long as guys like this are around, I will always have the next house payment!

  71. Anybody can fix computers... by solios · · Score: 2, Informative

    ... all you have to do is say "I CAN FIX THAT!" and have more of a clue than the person with the broke gear.

    Considering the number of retards and windows installs in the world, this is fairly easy to do.

    Computer "repair" is a lot like plumbing... the difference is that you don't see everyone who's plunged a toilet calling themselves a plumber and billing out 50$ an hour. Real plumbers know their shit and get paid accordingly- likewise, a real pc tech who actually knows their shit is earning their paycheck without breaking much of a sweat.

    The problem is finding competent people. It's reasonably easy to tell if your plumber doesn't know shit, but if you're not some degree of geek, you'll get totally snowed by "computer repair"- though if you're some degree of geek, you don't need one. :P

    1. Re:Anybody can fix computers... by spongman · · Score: 1
      Real plumbers know their shit
      You'd hope so, after dealing with other people's all day...
    2. Re:Anybody can fix computers... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Computer "repair" is a lot like plumbing... the difference is that you don't see everyone who's plunged a toilet calling themselves a plumber and billing out 50$ an hour. Real plumbers know their shit and get paid accordingly- likewise, a real pc tech who actually knows their shit is earning their paycheck without breaking much of a sweat.

      That's because when most peoples' computers fill up with shit, they don't even try to fix it.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  72. Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in the USA we have a boat load of shade tree windoze mechanix, hardware partz swapperz, and even a few shade tree unix repaimen.

    So, it's not as big a problem finding someone. Rather, the problem arises when 'good practice' fails and some thought has to be applied.

    Strangely it seems that it is easier to find a shade tree mechanic who can handle the thinking end of things, if one is willing to hunt up the dood with the good reputation. He'll usually charge the rate of 'professionals' but take much less time because one does not have to pay to work through the ranks.

    I fix all my own stuff. Computer, house, electrical, plumbing, furnace, TV, HiFi, automobile, ... and am pretty pleased that all of is pretty much half working ;-)

  73. Re:The reason computer techs are unqualified amate by XMyth · · Score: 1

    I'm curious...how much of that do the techs get, on average?

  74. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    incompetent hacks throw up complete rubbish on their blogs and people over react because they feel that one idiot's voice is important.

    1. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up! Mod parent up! +1 Insightful! +1 Insightful!

  75. Unqualified amateur journalists... by CarrionBird · · Score: 1
    Scary thought, geting our info from random unqualified people, that would suck.

    Oh, wait, it does!

    --
    Free Mac Mini Yeah, it's
  76. Does he own a phone book??? by destiny71 · · Score: 1

    When a domestic appliance goes wrong, you can ring a repair man. When your car breaks down you can call the garage. But when your computer system goes wrong, who do you call?

    ...there's no computer equivalent of a qualified service engineer who you can get to come around and fix things.


    A quick look in the yellow pages under Computers, Repair will show a list of what are supposed to be qualified computer repair shops in town.

    If you are smart enough to find the Appliances, Repair section, why can't you find the computer repair? I know for a fact that there's a computer repair shop in my town that can fix most anything that can go wrong with your PC. I was a tech there for about 5 years.

    Now I run into the problem that when they have a problem with their PC, they call their ISP, because they have FREE tech support (for help with the internet connection only, but that doesn't stop them) I know this, because I now work for my local ISP and helpdesk.

    But the fact still remains, this guy is an idiot when he makes this claim of no one to repair your PC.

  77. Just after hitting the button... by Illserve · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I realized the perfect example to shut your gob.

    My parents have been computer users since 1984. We had an Apple II+ (followed by a IIGS ugh), and then they some variety of PC's at work.

    They are very organized and successful people, and they used those early computers with no problem. Word processing, spreadsheets, it was enormously useful and rarely gave us problems. As the years have gone by, the problems they have had with computers have increased exponentially.

    This same story is being repeated in every computer owning household in the world.

    But if it makes you feel better to stand on your soapbox spewing gibberish about stupid everyone is and if they just follow your 6 simple steps (each of which has 10 implicit substeps that would require hours of training to get through) then everything would be rosy... well keep doing it I guess.

  78. Customer confusion... by Eskimore_ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm an 'in house' computer tech. It's my sole occupation. I don't work on a helpdesk, not that there's anything wrong with that, I actually bring the machine to my desk and repair it.

    For a while I tried to work independantly. I paid for some advertising and got a little work. Do you know what I found out. People (consumers, not businesses) don't want to spend money on computer repairs. And when they do they usually hire the wrong people.

    I don't mind saying that I'm very good at what I do. And working for myself I had the freedom to do whatever I had to do to please the customer. That stands in contrast to what most 'store techs' have the freedom to do for the customer. They can only do what the customer is paying for... in other words, no extras, no 'going the extra mile'.

    The end result was things like this kindly old lady (my first customer) paying $90/hour for some jerk to format and reinstall her pc. And he didn't update windows or tell her about doing so. WTF is that? 3 Months later she needed more work done....

    So when I formatted her machine I made sure to instruct her on how to get updates. I made sure to give her a quick tutorial on security in general. I also told her she could ask me questions in the future via email if she forgot anything. And I did all of that *for free* because I care about the service I provide.

    I think that a lot of 'rent a tech' types don't really give a damn about what the customer is going through because they're only getting paid $8/hour. (In Canada thats crappy pay).

    But do you know what the funny part is? I worked for about half to a third of what my competitors charged. But they were from the big computer stores so I could charge less and make more... but that's irrelevent to the customer. But I found that most people didn't want to pay me, they would wait until it was so bad they couldn't do anything and then they'd take it to a 'store tech' and get crappy service.

    So ya, no wonder people think the 'average' tech is a dumbass. It's because the tech is from Big O'l Retail Store and doesn't really give a damn.

    You want good computer work, then find someone that does it exclusively. Ask for references. Shop around. But whatever you do don't pay $90/hour for an $8/hour tech to give you $8/hour-quality service.

  79. Re:I'd also say this... by symbolic · · Score: 1


    I'm not sure how he comes up with this conclusion, unless the people he services actually told him that they'd used these "unqualified amateurs". It doesn't take a rocket scientist to reinstall windows, or insert an anti-virus CD and run it. Duh.

  80. Re:What's a good HARDWARE diagnostic for PCs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Send it to me, postage paid. I'll repair it and send it back.

    Honest. ;-)

  81. Well... by karn096 · · Score: 0, Troll

    He should have called GeekSquad!

  82. The guy's full of sh1t by smoker2 · · Score: 1

    Firstly, he "had a hunch" that people might need help fixing their computers.
    Well, the rest of us knew that a looong time ago. I used to offer the same service myself, but I guess I was ahead of my time. This was around 1998, and while I did get calls, not as many people owned pcs then. Then after a while, I got lots of competition from people who were prepared to basically work for nothing, or so it would seem from their rates.

    Of course, as I soon realised, these competitors were using these tactics to get a foot in the door, then convince the customer that something really expensive needed doing, whereas a simple job like adding a RAM stick would only really cost the price of the RAM and 1/2 hours labour.
    Being basically honest, I decided against being associated with that business.

    I did however make enough of an impression to still get calls from old customers to this day.

    Another point worth making is on the unqualified amateur subject. Considering that most relevant qualifications available are worthless anyway, except to line the pockets of unscrupulous teaching organisations, then I would expect to be more knowledgable by not having taken any "courses". Add to this the fact that no course you may take is going to be up to speed on the latest problems in the real world and you can discount this argument entirely. I mean do you really need CompSci to change over a hard drive or disinfect a Windows system. You don't even need to have ever held a soldering iron in anger. Its almost like companies asking for candidates with 10 years flash experience + 7 years VB6 + java + 4 years C# (would be good).

    Maybe I should get back in the game as an "Instructor" LOL.

    Finally, I notice he described himself as an "expert" on his advert. Maybe trades descriptions would like to hear about this....

  83. Qualified professionals by TheMCP · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My father is a veteran systems administrator with 35 years of experience in the industry. His and his girlfriends' home PCs keep getting virii, spyware, and adware.

    It's not that dad's an old coot, he actually keeps his skills up to date. It's that Windows is so unbelievably insecure he just can't keep up with it. He uses antivirus software, he tries to keep it up to date, he has multiple spyware scanners/removers which he updates regularly, and he just can't keep the systems clean. Every year or two it gets too unbearable and he just has to wipe the machine and reinstall from scratch, or replace it.

    If my father can't do it, then no normal mortal computer owner should be expected to do it.

    I think I've got Dad just about convinced to buy a Macintosh. When he hears that I have absolutely no problems with malware and I don't even have to have special software to prevent it, he gets very interested.

    1. Re:Qualified professionals by Knara · · Score: 2, Informative
      Windows XP + Free AdAware + Free Spybot S&D + Free AVG Antivirus + Firefox

      Ya put those on a machine, have them updated regularly, and it's really hard to get a messed up Windows install.

      The only thing that really gets me is that while Spybot S&D has an awesome TeaTimer resident proggie, it still requires users to answer whether or not they want to add/remove esoteric sounding registry keys. The average user (not me) has no idea what those keys will or will not do. It's the only gap in the above stated armor that could be problematic.

    2. Re:Qualified professionals by delus10n0 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft's AntiSpyware makes those registry messages "nicer", and filters out the less-infected ones.

      As a standard practice, I'll install AVG, Spybot and FireFox on someone's machine, and teach them how they all work, and what they do. 70% of the time the users write down what I'm saying, and actually seem interested. The other 30% of the time, they don't really care, and just want their computer working.

      Alas, that attitude is what got them there in the first place..

      --
      Not All Who Wander Are Lost
    3. Re:Qualified professionals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your dad has 10 more years industry experience than I have years alive, and yet I (and many others) can manage to keep a Windows install secure. Hell, I don't even run AV.

      Sorry, but it's your dad. Not Windows.

    4. Re:Qualified professionals by netringer · · Score: 3, Interesting
      My father is a veteran systems administrator with 35 years of experience in the industry. His and his girlfriends' home PCs keep getting virii, spyware, and adware.

      It's not that dad's an old coot, he actually keeps his skills up to date. It's that Windows is so unbelievably insecure he just can't keep up with it. He uses antivirus software, he tries to keep it up to date, he has multiple spyware scanners/removers which he updates regularly, and he just can't keep the systems clean. Every year or two it gets too unbearable and he just has to wipe the machine and reinstall from scratch, or replace it.

      If my father can't do it, then no normal mortal computer owner should be expected to do it.
      I'm a veteran system administrator with 33 years experience. None of my 5 personally run Windows systems are infected with anything.

      Staying clean is a matter of reading up on what's going on on the crapware front, not OK-ing crapware installs and #1 not using Internet Explorer. I also run and update and anti-virus, Spybot S&D and AdAware to make sure I don't miss anything. The only hits I get are for cookies.

      If you know you DON'T NEED any more browser plug ins....guess what else you don't need?

      I agree that mere civilians don't have chance. I talked by phone late into the night last night helping one of the smartest guys I know, a doctor 200 miles away who has had to spend way too much time trying to get PCs in his office working. Now his has something making it crawl we couldn't figure out over the phone. I got him working running Firefox on a another PC he brought in from home when IE on that one still refuses to work.

      I'm telling him to get an iMac on the LAN just so he and I have something that WILL connect and runs VNC so that I can get in and help the next time.

      We agreed that the guy's time is worth over $200 an hour. Last night Windows on Intel stole another $1200 from him. He figures it has cost him $5000 to $7000 each year.
      --
      Ever dream you could fly? Get up from the Flight Sim. I Fly
    5. Re:Qualified professionals by Mesaeus · · Score: 1

      I *always* insist on them writing it down while I demonstrate, just like I *always* demonstrate how to use their security programs. However, people seem to fall into these categories :

      1) Promises to update the antispyware and scan regularly, but doesn't do anything
      2) Promises the same and actually scans but can't seem to grasp the idea of getting new updates or the scan will be useless.
      3) Promises the same and actually updates and scans like I told him

      Percentages for these three seem to be 50-40-10. Really. After all the trouble I take to explain something for the hundredth time, I'm actually surprised when eventually one of them does exactly what I tell him.

    6. Re:Qualified professionals by Harassed · · Score: 2
      Your fathers Windows PC is, I am assuming, running XP (if not, upgrade to XP or scrap windows and run Linux or something). If so, it will happily auto-update itself for security fixes including SP2 with the in-built firewall. This is enough to stop any unauthorised inbound traffic with _no_ additional software. Antivirus can be covered off with one of several FREE AV products (personally, I use Grisofts AVG) - these also AUTOMATICALLY update themselves! To eliminate spyware, install AdAware, Spybot or MSAS. Finally, install Firefox.


      If he still can't keep the system clean then I'd be inclined to suggest he stop downloading dodgy crap from porn sites.


      Of course, there is the alternative theory which goes something like this:


      You are talking out of your ass.


    7. Re:Qualified professionals by Knara · · Score: 1
      Microsoft's AntiSpyware makes those registry messages "nicer", and filters out the less-infected ones.

      Haven't tried it out yet. That might make me actually consider it.

    8. Re:Qualified professionals by Seft · · Score: 1

      Yep, this guy must be the worst sysadmin ever...


      Actually, I've seen worse.

    9. Re:Qualified professionals by Bri3D · · Score: 1

      Not really. I have friends who have MS antispyware, AdAware, Spybot, Firefox, and Norton AV, and still get quite a bit of spyware. The fact is the antispyware people are always one step behind by the very nature of spyware, and once you've got even one infection it spawns enough more that one always gets past and completely breaks the system to the point where anti-spyware apps often don't even run right. And even the objects that anti-spyware apps detect often don't get removed totally and show up on the next boot(yes, even if you run the anti-spyware apps in safe mode and on the next boot).

    10. Re:Qualified professionals by Kneo24 · · Score: 1

      Your father is a nub. I don't buy that he has 35 years of experience with computers and can't keep his system cleaner longer than a year or two. The only time I ever have to do that is when I'm messing with settings I probably shouldn't be touching, and I forget to make a backup before I do it.

      Do I get malware, spyware, and virus problems? Yes I do! However I've done my research and I know how to make these potentially huge problems very minimal.

    11. Re:Qualified professionals by Harassed · · Score: 1

      What? You've met the parent poster too?

    12. Re:Qualified professionals by Knara · · Score: 1

      It depends a lot on the habits of your friends, I think. I've admin'd and supported (more than) my share of windows desktops for friends and businesses, and the only people I really have noticed with spyware problems are heavy P2P downloaders or warez kiddies (or, obviously, people with no/unmaintained protection programs). Obviously, they are not only in the minority, but a significantly higher risk factor for infection.

    13. Re:Qualified professionals by Digital+Avatar · · Score: 1

      Your daddy must be a qualified idiot. Windows is a serious pain in the ass, but virii, spyware, and adware are NO PROBLEM on Windows if you follow a few simple rules:

      1. If you're going to use Windoze, use XP. Anything earlier is woefully insecure and has no hope of ever being remotely secure.
      2. Turn on the built-in 'firewall' (if you want to call it that).
      3. Stop using IE and use Netscape or Opera or (your favorite alternative here) and, for god's sake, *DISABLE JAVA*. You don't fucking need it. Turn it on for those few sites that do, and disable it the rest of the time.
      4. Don't use Outlook Express for email, and whatever you do use, make sure that there's no way attachments can automatically execute in any way, shape, or form - and for god's sake, DONT EXECUTE ANY ATTACHMENTS.
      5. Stop downloading so much CRAP. Windows is horribly insecure on your end, so that next program you install could be the one that happily transforms your system into a member of a botnet. So just don't do it. If you have to download something, at least go to a trusted source of some kind to somewhat minimize your risk.

      Just follow those few simple rules and - OMG! - you'll find your system will be free of malware, adware, spyware, virii, etc. Remember: Security is not a product, it's not a feature, ITS A PROCESS.

      (This message brought to you by the Clueless Fucks Educational Foundation - serving the clue-by-four to your skull for over 25 years)

    14. Re:Qualified professionals by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      Sorry, your dad must not be doing something right. He might be fine with mainframes or whatever, but if he can't manage setting up antivirus software and anti-malware software, a simple firewall and disabling unnecessary services on his PC and avoiding the evil blue E on his desktop, then his skills are, if not up to date, something other than modern desktop system administration. He might be right at home on a Mac though, especially if he's UNIX savvy.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    15. Re:Qualified professionals by Nurgled · · Score: 1

      Also, have all of the inexperienced users (and ideally all of the experienced users too) set as limited user accounts. Even if someone needs to be able to install something, it's easy enough to run an installer as another user account.

      Now that I've left home my family's computer doesn't get the regular maintenence attention that it once did, so I've set everyone as a limited user account and created an "Admin" account which is used for software installation and other such tasks. I popped home over Easter and took the opportunity to check up and make sure nothing had slipped through, and sure enough everything was fine. What I did find, though, was lots of malware and worm installers in my brother's Internet Explorer cache, which would have been installed and running if he had access to write to the Windows directory.

      One of these days worm and spyware authors might wise up and install their software in the user's own file area and run from the current user startup list, but at least then a user on a shared machine is only screwing himself. If it comes to it, you can just back up the documents and nuke the user account.

    16. Re:Qualified professionals by ticktockticktock · · Score: 1

      That would work great...if all windows software could run in a limited account in Windows. Some programs you wouldn't think of like old versions of Quickbooks (2002 I think) require admin privileges in Windows XP to run and without admin privileges they might crash or pop up a cryptic error message when loaded.

    17. Re:Qualified professionals by jonasj · · Score: 1

      If you know you DON'T NEED any more browser plug ins

      I tried following the link in your sig. My Firefox said: "Additional plugins are required to display all the media on this page."

      :-)

      --
      You know, Microsoft's street address also says a lot about their mentality.
    18. Re:Qualified professionals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe someday your dad will get around to teaching you that the word is viruses and that there's no such word as "virii" except in the minds of pseudo-intellectual nerds.

    19. Re:Qualified professionals by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      For that price the guy could just throw his pc away in the trash and buy several every year.

      I can see where a professional might want $200 an hour but the value of pc's are falling. Why pay someone half the value of what a computer is worth?

    20. Re:Qualified professionals by Torne · · Score: 1

      I run Windows XP SP2, I download huge amounts of P2P media and warez, have no antivirus or antispyware running permanently, and have no application-level firewall (i.e. all outgoing connections are allowed), though I am behind a Linux firewall (non-NAT, my Windows box has a public IP, but the Linux box filters incoming connections to be to known services only). I occasionally run the latest version of whatever antivirus/spyware tool people seem to be talking about this week, and they don't find anything. There aren't any processes, services, tray icons or toolbars running that I don't specifically recognise, and I've never had to remove anything because it turned out to be malicious.

      Don't blame the warez; widely distributed warez is widely distributed because it *works*. A torrent with a high rating on a reg-required torrent site is unlikely to be laden with spyware; files grabbed from the original groups via IRC and compared to published checksums aren't trojanned, because the group would be found out in no time and would lose kudos (and get DoS'ed, probably, but hey).

      My parents' machine stopped getting any kind of infection the second I switched them to Firefox and Thunderbird. They've not had a single problem since, even though they use P2P networks to get music, video and software.

      Obviously not everyone has this experience, but every computer I've ever used has IE and OE as their sole infection vector of any note. ;)

    21. Re:Qualified professionals by loyukfai · · Score: 1

      Actually, IMO, IE isn't THAT bad, but if you're going to click every link in those chain mails you received, have luck keeping your PC clean.

      It's about knowing what you're actually doing (e.g. clicking links, installing software...) and making decisions on whether the risk worths it. But, it seems most users really don't know much about that.

      BTW, I'm kind of amused by the grandparent's author proclamation of his father's "veteran status", knowing that he can't keep his computer and complains about Windows.

      No disrespect, but I've met people who have used computers for many years but don't know how to handle and/or use Windows properly and divert the blame to Bill Gates.

    22. Re:Qualified professionals by netringer · · Score: 1
      For that price the guy could just throw his pc away in the trash and buy several every year. I can see where a professional might want $200 an hour but the value of pc's are falling. Why pay someone half the value of what a computer is worth?
      LOL! That's EXACTLY what he does after he wastes hours trying to get the PC in front of him to work. If he can't reach me, and sometimes even after I've tried to help over the phone for an another hour or two, he smashes it, throws it into to trash, and heads to Best Buy or calls Dell to get a new one.

      It kills me when he does that. I pointed out to him that it only gives more money to the ones that are causing him the trouble.

      He has tried getting local support. It's hopeless. Just like in this article, the "professionals" in his town aren't professional.

      Last night he called me from Best Buy as he was about to buy a new DSL router. We decided that wouldn't fix things and for once he went home empty handed. I'll guide him to ordering decent stuff online.

      I've talked him into getting a Mac to see how well it works for him. He'll likely get the new iMac or a Mac Mini in the meantime. We might try using the new (Microsoft!) Virtual PC for the Mac to run the Windows specific stuff.
      --
      Ever dream you could fly? Get up from the Flight Sim. I Fly
    23. Re:Qualified professionals by Nurgled · · Score: 1

      In most cases, playing around with the permissions on the install directory or installing it somewhere that the user has write access allows it to work. If it needs to write to the Windows directory to run, though, it's time to get a better application.

  84. Re:People treat their Refrigerators better then PC by Snommis · · Score: 1

    Actually, I think they treat PC much like refrigerators. An appliance. They do little or no maintenance. They don't see the symptoms of an impending failure until it's WAY too late. Usually pretty dirty, with some old, leftover stuff they'll never use, but won't throw out.
    Here's the real similarity - They are complex WAY above their heads, so they won't crack it open and try to fix it (usually), and the repair man is certainly out to screw them raw, and go back to their geek buddies to yuk it up about how they replaced a fictional part and charged the customer $175.
    Of course, if they would have spent a few more dollars for a unit with better features and quality parts, some of this could be avoided, but they want the cheapest, "bestest" one they can get (under $500).

    --
    Face it, do something enough times, and it can cause problems.
  85. Re:What's a good HARDWARE diagnostic for PCs? by MrP-(at+work) · · Score: 1

    have you checked for bulging/blown capacitors?

    --
    [an error occurred while processing this directive]
  86. Oh no! by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

    Anonymous coward tries BBC writing, finds grammatical errors.

  87. "IT" covers a wide array of skillsets... by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One can be unfamiliar with LAN or common Linux/Unix issues (or PC-related issues at all) and be quite competent in their area(s) of IT expertise.

    A lack of knowledge doesn't always imply incompetence. Sometimes it's simply a lack of knowledge.

    --
    Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
    The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
  88. Then don't buy one by destiny71 · · Score: 1

    These companies can't afford expensive support contracts with computer service organisations - and they haven't got the time to pack up the computer and take it to a shop, and then wait a week or so for it to be fixed.

    This is what I hate most about people that HAVE to have a PC. Do these companies think twice when they go to their local lube shop, and agree to monthly servicing of their fleet? Do they have montly phone plans that they have to pay for?

    The list goes on and on regarding regular bills that have to be paid to maintain and operate a business. If you want computers, you had better plan on one more. Don't want that bill? Buy a lot of pens and paper. Enough said.

  89. People don't want to read by amirl · · Score: 1

    Softwares are too complex for most of the people. They don't want to read the f* manual, and you won't change their mind, whatever you'll tell them. They too scared, hell knows from what but that's people.

    They don't read their TV's manual, car's manual or whatever manual there is. They don't want any message boxes with questions or information. The first thing they'll do is to push the closest button they think fit.

    In my opinion, OSs should be smart enough to answer most of the questions asked by other softwares installed. The default should be to show only the minimum required information. Microsoft has done a step forward but it would take years before operating a computer would be close to operating a television.

    --
    You can't get there from here.
  90. I take offense by scronline · · Score: 0

    I'm a qualified technician. I can vouche for the fact that there are quite a few out there that AREN'T qualified. But blanketing the entire industry like that. I'm quite insulted by being grouped with the majority of the "techs" out there. People go elsewhere because "it's cheaper" but then they bitch about the quality of service they get. It's something I've been complaining about for a long time. I'm good, I know what I'm doing and if you want quality work, you're going to pay for it. But don't group me with the guys that are nothing more than hacks that were home geeks and thought they could turn a hobby into a living and screw people in the process.

  91. This is called division of labour by MSBob · · Score: 1
    This is the nature of society my friends. People are not supposed to know how to fix everything they own.

    They say I'm a pretty smart guy overall and quite handy with power tools. But when it came to refinishing hardwood floors in my house I chose to pay someone to come and do it. I sure could have rented the tools taken some practice in less visible areas and breathed dust for a week and maybe saved a few hundred bucks. Instead I was more than happy to pay a guy $2K to do all the messy work for me leaving me with brand new looking floors after my vacation.

    That's called division of labour and it's a good thing. What seems like a trivial computer issue to me is probably dumbfounding to my floor repairman. But he knows everything there is to know about wood floors and I'm sure he's not any less smart than me. It is all about what we choose to specialize in.

    --
    Your pizza just the way you ought to have it.
  92. Re:The reason computer techs are unqualified amate by dlZ · · Score: 1

    Yep, I charge $39 an hour, but that's only at my shop. House calls are extra, depending on mileage and the kind of job.

    --
    rm -rf ./evidence @ punkcomp
  93. Computer Repairman 1.0 by kyoko21 · · Score: 1

    Perhaps he should be a chinaman and learn how to repair an abacaus before he try his hand on a real computer that plugs into the wall. :-)

    Ok ok... I'm going to modded down... :-/

    1. Re:Computer Repairman 1.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The chinaman is not the issue!! Also, Dude, the preferred nomenclature is Asian-American.

    2. Re:Computer Repairman 1.0 by kyoko21 · · Score: 1

      I like china-man. Because I am one.

  94. Re:What's a good HARDWARE diagnostic for PCs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you hadn't mentioned your memtest86's, I would've sworn it was bad RAM. Memory testers aren't perfect; you might want to try swapping out the memory anyway, even though memtest says it's OK.

  95. simple solution by idlake · · Score: 1

    Most of these problems can be solved fairly simply: give them a copy of Knoppix or Ubuntu/Live and just have them use that. Data goes on USB sticks. There is little to screw up that way and it fulfills all the basic functions that people need: web, office, mail, graphics, etc.

  96. oh my by Brian+doog · · Score: 1

    I went to school to be a programmer but turned to telecom for my first job, went on to be a voice administrator and am now just a repairman... I love this job and I learn as much as I want or have time for, I decide how much time I'll need to fix a system. It's not hard to do my job but any good repairman has a few years of expirience to deal swiftly and correct to any problem. Only problem is that people generaly think my clicking the mouse 5 mins or updating firmware is something the guy at the newsstand could have told them. But as that guys number wasn't available, they called you and expect to pay just enough to buy a beer. Do you really expect from the first repairman you call to be a modern Homo universalis?

  97. We can only hope... by IdJit · · Score: 1

    that his toilet explodes and he calls a plumber who just happens to be a /. reader!

  98. In alot of cases it's the customer's fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even if the person they have helping them is competent, some times the end user will still blunder into trouble no matter how often their computer is serviced and they are advised to keep their security software updated and run regularly.

    Using the dishwasher analogy: If you take one home and try to do a load of gravel while banging on it with a sledgehammer, is Maytag to blame?

  99. Author obviously skewed by vectorian798 · · Score: 1

    This article was written to be a filler...he probably had nothing else to write about and so pulled this out his ass...

    ...most people who have computer trouble have at least one techie friend who is not an "amateur", and can fix the problem for them.

    And the thing about something bound to go wrong in some time is stupid...there are machines that obviously go without even reboots for a few years. If computers had a degree of randomness or failure after some time, it would come pretty quick since there are billions of instructions being processed all the time - what excactly is this time-to-failure? Well, you could make an argument that a hard disk is rated for 100,000 hours or something but I think the author is speaking of software.

    And furthermore, most people DO KNOW to go into google and search but are scared of the consequences of perhaps doing something wrong - just like most people who use Windows are probably scared to go edit some random-ass file in Linux to get something to work.

    In short, this article is stupid and actually is not slashdot-worthy really...it's just something we tear to pieces anyways.

  100. Good enough by Crashmaster007 · · Score: 1

    In my family and among neighbors I'm normally the one who is called to do tech support. 95% of the time the complaint is "Computer is slow" or "Pop-ups all over the place". So I wander on over to their house, do some scans, stop some processes from starting and they are fixed. Normally I will also install Firefox. Then I write them up a nice little schedule of PC maintenance with instructions for each step. Normally they stick to that for about a week or two. But it's a week or two where I don't have to help them. In the end it is up to the end user to get informed and protect themselves. Most do not do this, so they have us. Which is normally good enough.

    --
    I reject your reality and substitute my own.
  101. Economics hampers repair process by wcrowe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There are two reasons why so many amateurs are the only ones doing this kind of work.

    The first reason is that computers often cost more to fix than what was paid for them in the first place.

    It can take a few hours sometimes to fix some of the more persistent viruses and malware out there. As a consequence, only businesses seem to be able to afford my services.

    The second reason is that home users have unreasonable expectations. Many seem to think that once I've touched their computer, I own it, and anything that goes wrong after that is my fault, not theirs.

    I've only made a couple of home user calls. My first call was on a PC that had 26 viruses and over 100 malware and spyware-related issues.

    In another case I had to tell a lady that she could buy a new PC for about $200 less than what it would cost me to rid her aging computer of demons.

    Surprisingly, I have noticed that I charge $20/hr less than Geek Squad out of the local Best Buy. However, the home computer market is a touchy one.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
    1. Re:Economics hampers repair process by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You and I have slightly different approaches towards this, I actually prefer doing it for the home user over the business user, I tend not to charge as much for repairing a personal computer than a business computer but the average home user takes what I tell them for faact rather than questioning everything I tell them, if I tell them that they should back up important data or if I tell them that I cannot retrieve something for some reason they accept that, most of the time with businesses (granted they're usually small businesses) if I tell them they need to back up their records they say "good idea" and never do anything about it, and when I tell them that something is gone forever they won't accept that answer (one place I did some work for had a string of hard drive failures, and I mean BAD hard drive failures, for some reason four of their computers ended up with HDI and they waited until the hard drives were completely dead before calling me rather than right when they first started experiencing issues)

    2. Re:Economics hampers repair process by wcrowe · · Score: 1

      Your experiences have been better than mine, though I too have the irritating problem of businesses not doing what I suggest, especially when it comes to making backups.

      Business users seem to be more understanding when it comes to the bill, though.

      --
      Proverbs 21:19
    3. Re:Economics hampers repair process by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1
      It can take a few hours sometimes to fix some of the more persistent viruses and malware out there. As a consequence, only businesses seem to be able to afford my services.

      Darn, your rates must be a slice higher than mine. But then, I suppose that colors it somewhat. If everyone charged $500/hr. to fix them (hypothetical, of course) then PCs would seem dirt cheap in comparison.

      The first reason is that computers often cost more to fix than what was paid for them in the first place.

      Well, that depends on a few things.

      1) Spyware. 9/10 problems I see these days are spyware, and a lot of spyware infections are fixable. I know, I've battled some ugly ones that took two attempts and a bit of luck. But I killed 'em. Even if not, a reformat/reinstall cleanses all if the hardware is sound. Not many people are willing to junk a PC just because "BonziBuddy hacked me!". Like burning the house down because a robber stole the TV.

      1b) Digression: For the people who would rather buy a new PC, I've wondered if you could make a dime off buying relatively-new spyware-choked PCs for a quarter market price, then cleaning them and reselling at 3/4s market price, for a near 200% profit on investment. Some deft case changing and you could get someone with more money than brains to buy their own machine on a semiregular basis.:)

      2) Ownership. It's "my computer" like it's "my car" and a new one wouldn't 'feel right', so they don't get a new one until the Magic Smoke's made a break for it. Even newbies with no idea how to hack on the registry or TweakUI will have their icons just so.

      2b) Ownership 2.0: We all have our quirks. Our PCs are no different, particularly after we've installed a ton of stuff. One guy asked me if he'd be better off reformatting or even buying a new PC due to a massive spyware infection. I asked him if he still had the install CD for his scanner, his photo editing software, his genealogy stuff, etc. (All devoted to his hobby of building a massive family tree.) Ten minutes of hunting turned up one CD of the five he deemed "critical". He decided to let me have a go at fixing it. As it was, it cost him $125 to get his computer going good as new. Telling a user the hidden costs of buying a new box (not scare tactics, just the truth) makes them much more receptive to the idea of a repairman.

      3) Prevention and education. Not all newbies are morons. The good ones not only want the problem fixed, they want to keep it from happening again, and are willing to learn what they're doing wrong and change their behavior. Buying a new computer won't stop spyware or overheating, if the root cause (bad browsing habits, PC next to stove) isn't addressed.

      4) How highly you value your data. In my experience, a lot of people want their computer fixed (though I've almost never gone over 6 hours on one machine) because their buddy list/e-mails/family photos/MP3s are on it. Data transfer isn't always feasible. And since the PC repair guy is likely also the data transfer guy, the hourly rates are the same either way.

      The second reason is that home users have unreasonable expectations. Many seem to think that once I've touched their computer, I own it, and anything that goes wrong after that is my fault, not theirs.

      I call them bad customers. When I started working on PCs, I was a teenage geek and a lot of people I worked for were adults and I got walked on. But after getting screwed over a few times I grew a spine. You set them straight, and if they're still jerky, you drop them as customers - there's no law that says you have to continue a losing business relationship. Getting people to sign an official-looking contract-type document stating what the problem was and that it was fixed also scares them off. Sure, you have to explain what you did in fine detail and wait around while they test the machine, but if it makes them willing to sign a CYA paper, why not?

      One annoying harpy's kid had taken to sending me e-mails about all

    4. Re:Economics hampers repair process by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

      "Newbie.:) Let me know when you see 10 viruses, two trojans, a dialer, and over 2000 other files devoted to 25 types of malware."

      That's it?

      I give home users a choice of services. I can pick it up, get the crap off of it (viruses, trojans, backdoors, malware, etc...), and bring it back for a flat 110 and tax (I'm rigged up to do several machines at once this way). Or if they want me to sit at their house working on it it's $55/hr and tax. Phone is $15 for the first five minutes, a dollar a minute after that (harder to collect, but eventually I'll have cc processing).

      Some people you just have to 'fire'. Had one lady that kept complaining that her mouse didn't work right (entirely new user), it doesn't do what she wants (which I told her that it won't do what she wants, but exactly what she makes it do), and after a couple hours on site I thought she had the hang of it. So she calls back with the same complaint.... serveral times... sometimes as late as 9pm (which is rude) so I told her to never call me back. Eventually she's going to piss off all the techs in town.

      I also have everyone sign a stock work order that lists the specific prolems they are having, and absolves me of any damage from testing, repair, transport, etc... I also list everything done to fix the problem(s), then have them sign off when the work is complete and demonstrated to be fixed. Makes life a whole lot easier. The three biggest letters a tech will ever know is CYA (Cover Your Ass for the newbs).

    5. Re:Economics hampers repair process by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1
      "Newbie.:) Let me know when you see 10 viruses, two trojans, a dialer, and over 2000 other files devoted to 25 types of malware."

      That's it?

      Uh-oh. Oh, well. My fault for starting the Freudian measuring contest.:)

      I give home users a choice of services. (Snip.)

      Sounds like you've got it all together pretty neatly, including the dealing-with-clients end. Impressive.

      The three biggest letters a tech will ever know is CYA (Cover Your Ass for the newbs).

      Indeed. If I forget it, something pops up to remind me.:\

      --
      "Lithuania is tin-plated and the user's manual is arbitrary." - Fnorder.

    6. Re:Economics hampers repair process by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

      "Uh-oh. Oh, well. My fault for starting the Freudian measuring contest.:)"

      Heh, call it what you want, but untill you've walked to your first service call uphill both ways through a snowstorm during a heatwave while being tracked by a pack of hungry shrews you really don't know the service industry. ;)

  102. A good analogy by SamMichaels · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I do this for a living. Thank you to all the crappy software vendors, virus creators and spyware companies.

    But seriously...I use this analogy for my customers: You change the oil in your car every 3000 miles, you read the owners manual, you took a driver's test. A PC is a machine just like a car and it needs attention. You need to read up on it and look after it just like any other appliance or machine.

    When you're on the highway, you're sharing the road with other drivers...much like when you're on the internet you're sharing it with other people. You have insurance incase someone hits your car...but you don't have virus protection or spyware protection incase someone from the net hits your PC.

    Same story, different day.

    1. Re:A good analogy by doppleganger871 · · Score: 0

      Government requires licenses to use all sorts of tools (whether it be vehicles, firearms, or other items), but turns a blind eye to people who use destructive computers that end up spamming, DDoS'ing, or causing other types of damage. Nobody has been killed by a virus or DDoS attack... yet. It'll happen sooner or later.

      I suppose that's why I take such an interest in the maintainenance of my property. I do 90% of the work on all my vehicles, I do 100% of the work on all my computers, and 100% of any repairs that may need to be done on any other home electronics or other items that the landlord isn't responsible for. I hate not knowing how something works.

    2. Re:A good analogy by Theaetetus · · Score: 2, Insightful
      When you're on the highway, you're sharing the road with other drivers...much like when you're on the internet you're sharing it with other people. You have insurance incase someone hits your car...but you don't have virus protection or spyware protection incase someone from the net hits your PC.

      [shrug] I use a Mac - it cost a little bit more at the dealer, but it will have higher resale value when I get rid of it. My highway gets me to where I want to go quickly and easily, and I've got a shield around my vehicle that other drivers bounce off of without my knowledge. I can close my eyes (no firewall, no anti-virus) and drive safely and confidently.

      I pick up a little extra money on the side ($55/hr, $75/hr if I don't like the person) fixing computers (both hardware and software), but it's side income. Everyone I know, I recommend to use a Mac. Sure, that'll eventually put me out of business, but it's not my real job anyways, and I'd rather have happy productive friends than unhappy unproductive acquantances.

      -T

    3. Re:A good analogy by moontumbohotmail.com · · Score: 1

      Not that I don't agree with the premise, but there is a slight difference. With a car, you don't have to pay a good portion of the car's purchase price every time it needs a tune-up. As has been pointed out several times in this discussion, if we charge 45 bucks an hour which is the going rate where I live, they could buy a new Dell for the price of a couple of tune-ups.

    4. Re:A good analogy by SamMichaels · · Score: 1

      When you don't take care of your car and the engine freezes or when you get into a car accident, it's a significant portion of the purchase price. That's comparable to a severe virus/spyware infection since it cripples the machine.

  103. Re:The reason computer techs are unqualified amate by FusionDragon2099 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Heh. Lightweight. I break their computer and then they have to pay me to get an all-new one. And if they're too cheap to get one, problem solved.

  104. When (NOT) to use a bigger hammer..... by northwind · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is the classical example of somebody not understanding how to use a computer.
    If a laptop fails:
    First backup your things (which you should have done in the first place).
    Next reload the system software. Windows will eventually screw itself up anyway.
    Finally you contemplate other options.
    The attitude of "somebody should have created an easy downloadable solution to fix my world" is increasingly being deployed instead of brains.
    We are 4 people in my hopusehold. 12 computers of which 5 are running Windows, the rest running Linux. Even my kids have no problems with windows other than windows itself. They all know the drill: Keep your stuff in a directory structure called "My World". In case of malfunction or our linux firewall screaming bloody virus warning: Time to find the Knoppix disk and delete the windows system directory. Then you reload windows and the world is at peace once more.
    How in the world do you think I could otherwise keep this menagerie runing?

  105. Re:The reason computer techs are unqualified amate by dtfinch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As little as humanly possible, unless the employer's a commie.

  106. Absolutely by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 1

    You want to get paid well, get some professional qualifications and sorry... MCSE doesn't exactly cut the mustard.

    You want someone who knows what they're doing? Get someone with professional qualifications.

    It is however a solved problem, lawyers, accountants, doctors etc all have to belong to professional bodies in order to practice. You want to be taken seriously in IT? The BCS in the UK, IEEE Computer Society and/or ACM in the US (and internationally), the ACS in Australia.

    You want someone who takes what they do seriously? Or maybe a fly by night cowboy will do.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
    1. Re:Absolutely by binner1 · · Score: 1

      Not that I think belonging to the ACM is bad, but I fail to see how it makes you automatically 'qualified.' Unless things have changed since I was last a member, you had to do nothing else but PAY THE DUES to be an ACM member. While an ACM membership does provide many great benefits, 'qualified professional' status isn't one of them imho.

      Someone correct me if I'm wrong here...

      -Ben

    2. Re:Absolutely by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 1

      ACM:

      "You must satisfy one of the qualifications below:
      Bachelor's Degree (in any subject area); or
      Equivalent Level of Education; or
      Two years full-time employment in the IT field."

      Not massively stringent, I agree, but better than nothing and it at least shows an inclination towards a professional approach to IT. The IEEE Computer Society is closer to what I'd consider a professional IT body in the US.

      IEEE:

      Qualifications for IEEE Membership
      (one of the following):

      * Electrical engineer or computer scientist graduated from a recognized educational degree program.
      * A related degree plus three years applicable professional experience.
      * Six year applicable professional experience.
      * Interest in the technical fields of the IEEE (Associate Member level, no voting rights)

      --
      Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  107. Dentists too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The BBC also needs to do a special on the lack of Dental and orthodontics professionals in the common wealth! (sorry low blow but good for a cheap laugh.)

  108. Re:What's a good HARDWARE diagnostic for PCs? by Tjoppen · · Score: 1

    This sounds a lot like my old Athlon machine:

    memory would occacionally fail
    HDDs would bog down the system
    spontaneous reboots
    gfx failure
    didn't like non-integer clock multipliers
    sometimes the FSB would set to 100 instead of 133
    two PSUs exploded

    I believe I've replaced every part(or tested in other machines) except the motherboard. Which I guess is my/your machine's problem.

  109. People problem by Skiron · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can't remember who said it, but "You put a supposedly intelligent person in front of a computer and they become an incompetent idiot".

    At work I deal with some front line helpdesk stuff, and honestly sometimes you wonder what on earth these people do at home (I keep getting an error message! What does it say? I don't know... I don't understand computers) - like if a light bulb goes, do they sit in the dark until an electrician comes out to replace it?

  110. Excuse me, this article is just a rant/flamebait? by RedLaggedTeut · · Score: 1

    Excuse me, this article by Paul Rubens is just a rant/flamebait, isn't it?

    After all, why should someone offering "computer repair" be restricted to offering a physical repair, and why not checking for spyware, etc. as well?

    I'm also missing interesting details in the article that would help me to mend my evil ways should I venture to become an "amateur computer repairman" !

    Also, you get what you pay for - if you want repairs as cheap as possible, you end up with people with a limited repertoire, not with a costly team of experts.

    --
    I'm still trying to figure out what people mean by 'social skills' here.
  111. Amateurs? Well... by doppleganger871 · · Score: 0

    ...I suppose then the average computer user is the equivalent of a drooling, babbling idiot.

    My whole theory still holds true. There is only X amount of computer knowledge in the world. If Y amount of people are using computers, then the knowledge per person is X/Y. So, as the amount of users, Y, increase, the share of knowedge, X, per user continues to decrease. If you think about it, it's more on target than Moore's law.

  112. It's the GUI stupid by deeLo57 · · Score: 0

    You ever to PC work for the average home user?
    if you open a command line, the over 40 crowd thinks your a computer god, the 24 and under crowd thinks your some kind of uber hacker.

    you can buy a car without being a mechanic but you still need a license to prove you won't kill the cat backing out of the driveway, nothing like that exists for computers.. because you'll only harm yourself and you'll have to call one of 5 companies to help you

    AOL, Microsoft and others have spent millions of engineering hours to make sure anyone can get online and stark clicking everywhere they see something flashing, it reminds me of the senior citizen zombies in front of the slot machines at the casinos
    they have zero knowledge of what it takes to win...and believe in luck, just "max bet" and hit the 3 buttons....try again

    There is absolutley no need anymore for anyone to understand anything regarding operating systems, file structure, syntax, controls, etc
    br? I have a 512 usb flash drive with Mozzila/-plugins galore ad-aware/spy-bot etc. a couple of dos bat and vbs files. It takes about 20 minutes to get the average pc back into good health. You barter a good homecooked dinner or a bottle of something you like... show them the glory of tabbed browsing and not clicking anything that warns them that thier computer may be infected and to 'click here' to scan. You spend 15 minutes explaining how to use spy bot etc. Put a post it note with Dell/MS/Verizon/Comcast/ whatever tech support line. PS.... show them the help button

  113. The OS isn't designed well enough by c0d3h4x0r · · Score: 1

    The root cause of all of these problems is poor OS design. A properly-designed consumer OS needs to do two things to avoid these kinds of problems:

    • Provide the user with complete control over every detail of their own system, but...
    • ...make it impossible for the user to fuck themselves over with that power

    Windows XP does a half-assed job on both counts, and that's the fundamental problem. Longhorn will take some steps to address these issues, although I'm betting it will still only be about 2/3-assed.

    For instance, normal users will no longer run as administrators by default, and new security infrastructure will safely allow qualified code to carry out administrative operations when it needs to on behalf of the user. But this will probably only work for new software written to take advantage of it. It will be years before all the existing WinXP-generation software gets phased out and replaced by equivalent Longhorn versions that utilize this approach, so in the meanwhile, people will still probably set themselves to run as Administrators so all their existing software will work.

    Another instance: Device Manager is the right idea for managing devices and drivers, but it's not nearly bulletproof enough. Device management in WinXP has a variety of buggy behaviors that I won't go into here, but they would all need to be fixed, and the user should never have to boot into "safe mode" to deal with some device or driver issue.

    A third instance: it's simply poor design that a program can launch at Windows start or user login in a hidden way or without the user having specifically chosen for that to happen by placing an icon into their Startup folder in the start menu. All these various hidden ways (Run and RunOnce regkeys, etc) for programs to launch themselves at startup need to be eliminated from the design of the OS, to put that control exclusively in the hands of the user. This alone would go a LONG way toward ridding the world of spyware/malware.

    --
    Moderator hint: a comment is neither "Flamebait" nor "Troll" if it is true.
    1. Re:The OS isn't designed well enough by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 1

      The only problem is that you've given two mutually exclusive conditions. The design of the OS is irrelevant, you can't give the user complete control over the system and at the same time keep them from using that control to hurt themselves. Trying is like trying to give someone the ability to drive as fast as they like in a car while still protecting them from driving too fast into that turn, losing it and splattering themselves all over the landscape. The only way to protect them is to prevent them from driving faster than is safe, and that directly conflicts with letting them drive as fast as they want.

      I think a better solution is to start dividing users into categories. Let's face it, when it comes to cars we don't expect Aunt May who's never gone over 25mph in her life to be able to drive the same kinds of cars a Formula One driver could. Similarly, why should a secretary who needs only to answer e-mail, write letters and deal with a few spreadsheets, and a software developer who needs to compile new programs and dig around at the lowest levels of the system to debug software that didn't even exist last week, be expected to be using the exact same kinds of systems with the exact same capabilities?

    2. Re:The OS isn't designed well enough by c0d3h4x0r · · Score: 1

      The only problem is that you've given two mutually exclusive conditions.

      No I haven't. You don't have to sacrifice one to get the other. You're just conditioned to think that way because of all the poorly designed OSes that currently exist.

      Regardless of the user's level of expertise, and regardless of the purpose the PC will serve (desktop/server/etc), every user and every purpose will benefit from having certain common core tasks work in a bulletproof, consistent way.

      Of course you wouldn't turn a home user loose with a server OS and admin privileges and expect them to not configure something stupidly or insecurely. For instance, they could format the drive the system resides on, or remove critical system files. I'm not suggesting anyone attempt to idiot-proof such scenarios. This is exactly why consumer desktop users should not be running as Administrator/root.

      What I am suggesting is that certain common core tasks, like adding/removing programs, adding/removing devices/drivers, and choosing which programs launch at start/login should not be considered privileged or administrative chores. OSes have traditionally been architected around the idea that these tasks are major administrative things that won't be done frequently, but in reality these are things that ordinary users need to be able to do on a pretty regular basis. The base OS should be architected so as to provide a bulletproof, user-friendly implementation of these that is available to all types of users and which cannot possibly foobar the state of your system or other installed programs. Having such a bulletproof architecture not only benefits desktop users, but it makes the lives of ubergeek system administrators easier as well.

      --
      Moderator hint: a comment is neither "Flamebait" nor "Troll" if it is true.
    3. Re:The OS isn't designed well enough by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 1

      Let me rephrase your comment: "Ordinary users shouldn't be allowed to hot-rod their cars, but installing a turbocharger and nitrous system and upgrading the brakes and installing a sports suspension shouldn't be considered hot-rodding.". You can't mess around with the basic building blocks of the system (drivers, system-wide installed programs, etc.) without exactly the risks that you don't want users to have to take.

      You can create a bullet-proof (from the user's POV) OS, but to do it you have to prevent the user from installing drivers, arbitrary software, etc.. That isn't an OS-design issue, it's a fundamental principle: you can't give someone power without giving them power. Failure to grasp this simple concept, applicable to every aspect of human society, is why Windows is such a mess right now.

    4. Re:The OS isn't designed well enough by c0d3h4x0r · · Score: 1

      Well, you're completely wrong, but obviously you aren't going to be persuaded away from your flawed opinion regardless of any amount of idealism on my part. So, EOA (end of argument).

      --
      Moderator hint: a comment is neither "Flamebait" nor "Troll" if it is true.
  114. The Road Ahead ...to Insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a T-shirt at ThinkGeek.com that says, "No, I will not repair your computer". As one of his fellow "amateurs", I think that this man has let himself in for more than he could imagine.

    I have one non-technical friend whom I support and help with computer issues, and he's the good kind --- this individual actually listens to what I tell him, and learns and understands. He appreciates things like "limited" accounts under XP. He's never asked the same question twice. The problems he's experienced have not been of his own [direct] making, but I can often sort them in fifteen minutes (and I learn stuff in the process). Hence, I enjoy supporting this guy because my wisdom is being passed on and put to good use.

    Oh, if only they were all like that. When it comes to some I've seen, I can only say that if they drove a car like they use a computer, they'd be bloody dangerous. Just like:

    Helen, a housewife [who contacted Rubens] because adverts for porn sites kept popping up on her computer screen when her kids where [sic; standards are slipping at the BBC] doing their homework.

    "Helen" (or should that be "Lynette"?) the Housewife really should take more care! Why would anyone visit the kinds of sites that can spread that kind of adware when children use the same machine? When people take this blatantly cavalier attitude (yes, I am a snob and a disciplinarian), is it any surprise when bad things happen? If my years of computer use have taught me anything, it's that the digital domain has its own kind of karma --- and your sins will find you.

    Which is all very well. Except that (a) sinners never learn; and (b) the sinners always come and find me.

    It's got to the point where I've told my family not to mention that I'm good with computers. "I'm crap with them." I don't like the stress, and I don't want the responsibility of administering yet another person's PC and having to give them a crash course on Security and Maintenance, and how the World Wide Web is not The Internet. I'm not a one-man IT support department, and I can think of better ways to spend my precious time. Doing what Rubens does (paid or not) would drive me potty.

    Let's see how long he lasts.

  115. Mainstream media catches up to 16 year old boys by Fox_1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I imagine like many a young geek I was not alone in repairing PC's for access to food, money and girls. I didn't have qualifications other then being born into a household where computers were modded on a regular basis.(my appleIIc dual booted between an ibm board and the apple board) Of course what was important to me as a young geek isn't as important now. Fixing someones PC is a pain in the ass. Inevitably there is going to be something you didn't expect - like very few people keep motherboard manuals, and how do you look up jumper info when the only machine around is the one your repairing. When I was 16-20 it provided pocket money and access to girls and food (pasta for powerpoint anyone?) but as an adult I long ago realized that my time is more valuable - if I was doing it for a company I would expect min $50 an hour, I spent the years accumulating the experience and refining the skills. The average home user isn't willing to pay the 50$ an hour so they get 16-19 year old kids(unqualified amaturs)fixing their pc's. I have nothing against these kids, and I imagine many of them are more capable then me with some of these technologies. As long as the home user refuses to pay professional rates for PC service then that market place will stay the domain of young geeks, and provide them a place to use their skills for food, girls and money. Let em have it - if you are worth professional rates work in the professional market - don't work in the home market and crowd out the kids.

    --
    The rock, the vulture, and the chain
    1. Re:Mainstream media catches up to 16 year old boys by Kotukunui · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Fixing PCs these days is now the equivalent of mowing lawns when I was a kid. Earning money doing something that the adults didn't want to be bothered with.

    2. Re:Mainstream media catches up to 16 year old boys by BarakMich · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I did the exact same thing, and it was good -- I could get the pocket money I needed to keep going a little longer, be it gas money, movie money, coffee money, etc.

      I expect home computer repair to join the ranks of babysitting, dog walking, and lemonade stands -- ie, under-the-table jobs for younger-to-mid teens.

      Hell, if you would trust someone with your *KIDS* for a few hours, trusting a geek to figure things out on a computer has gotta be less stressful. And the pay should be roughly the same, as both free you up to either go out or be more productive.

      Plus, you'd be surprised what some of the geekier kids around can do.

      When I was 15 or so, I once got $50 for doing what a so-called "professional" could not -- a printer that was purchased wasn't working properly. The professional, I'm told, took all day, deemed it unfixable, and charged for the 8 hours of time. I walk in, check the BIOS (hey -- what's *this* setting), reinstall the driver and voila. 1 hour total, and I'm done. Plus, while things are rebooting/installing I answered all the guy's questions about software/hardware purchases to the best of my knowledge.

      Being in college, and the resident geek on the floor, I've done more minor tune ups -- and I've gotten things like plates of cookies out of the deal.

      Bottom line -- just like if you have a teaching credential you don't keep on babysitting (comments about the school system (esp. high school) merely being babysitting aside), if you have a real computer degree, you don't keep repairing computers. Details are for people who are paid by the hour :)

    3. Re:Mainstream media catches up to 16 year old boys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree totally. I am a 17 year old geek who fixes computers of whoever gets in contact with me for a fairly nominal fee ( $15/hour canadian or cheaper depending on problem, I used to charge less but some people are really nice). These people could take the computer back to the local big box store and have it sit there for days before a tech even takes a look at it and get charged $50+ an hour. The fact that amateurs will do housecalls for 1/8th what pro's cost (I did a work experience at a comp store, they charged $90/hour for house calls) will keep people coming to us. Considering the other ways i've acquired money over the years its one of the easiest.

      1)Refereeing hockey, great money but people yell at you no matter what
      2)Paperboy, the money blows so hard its not even funny.
      3)Working at local purified water store, well I was in good shape for a few months though the money sucked for what I was doing and I was bored out of my skull. Also worked 6 days a week but only 2hr shifts, that has gotta be illegal somehow.

      Now doing computers I get good money, kick back most of the time on people's old computers while x (spyware, antivirus etc check runs) and drink juice. This to me is the evolution of part time job for students. Its great for me because I don't have to work very much, and work on my own schedule.

      I don't even know if there is a market for professionals here. They would be competing with kids, who are way cheaper, and big box stores who have big advertising dollars. I'm not sure what the author's angle is, perhaps he would like everyone working on a cs degree to be flipping burgers for him not doing something which they have an aptitude in. For me I believe this is just someway for kids who spend way to much time on the computer to get compensated for that knowledge.

      In the end it does not take a microsoft certification to know how to run AVG, spybot S&D or use msconfig. Which is what nearly every house call I have ever done has come down to.

  116. You're missing something. by MrAnnoyanceToYou · · Score: 1

    When my family says, "Dylan is in computers," they don't know anything about what I do. I'm not an IT guy, so when my friends call with problems, they get a boilerplate attempt at fixing it, and a subsequent blow off if it didn't work. My family gets 5 hours, after which I throw up my hands and leave.... Making that assumption is good form, but it's not exactly the best way to do things. Sometimes the problem is something you can't quite see, can't look at in the right way, and if you're a programmer normally hardware might mystify you. Not me, but I've met those who are that way.

  117. Re:The reason computer techs are unqualified amate by Eggplant62 · · Score: 1

    $40 for residential customers, $60-$100/hour for commercial depending on the difficulty of the problems, and *I* decide on how difficult.

  118. Hi! I'm Pee Wee and here's your Knoppix CD! by wsanders · · Score: 1

    I think I have a franchise opportunity here. Please send enquiries to /dev/null.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  119. stop porn scaremongering! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I have gigs of porn, and have never had a problem with malware. The one time I did get something was when I downloaded a crack that included a trojan. Downloading warezed software is inherently risky, but porn seems to be safe - no executables. The only way you could get in trouble is via browser vulnerabilities (and I don't use IE so I'm safe-ish) or something else like buffer overflows in jpeg libraries. Which isn't exactly porn-specific anyway.

    1. Re:stop porn scaremongering! by danila · · Score: 1

      A user can get into problems anywhere. There are definitely shady porn sites, shady crack sites, there are bogus files on P2P, you can catch a virus/troyan anywhere (in addition to those that get onto the PC using exploits).

      But when a user realises that running exe files that are downloaded automatically is a bad idea, when he realises that downloading any "clients" from porn sites is a bad idea, etc., then he is relatively safe (especially with safer browsers such as Opera or Moz).

      Even warez is 99% safe if you have some net experience. It is usually obvious when someone is trying to cheat you into installing some malware. But most of the time getting cracks from asta is safe, as well as getting software from P2P (if you check comments, filenames, etc.).

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    2. Re:stop porn scaremongering! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But most of the time getting cracks from asta is safe

      I got spywarified for the first time in my life from an astalavista crack. Fake Windows XP keygen. I executed the program, noticed my hard disk start to grind and a new icon appear for a split second in my taskbar. I immediately started to swear.

      I'd say instead that getting cracks for relatively obscure software is safe. The likes of Windows and Photoshop cracks are dangerous.

    3. Re:stop porn scaremongering! by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


      You're absolutely correct.

      I visit porn sites regularly to build up my collection of hot babe pictures (cheap hobby), and I have rarely gotten any spyware or trojans or viruses from them.

      They don't need to do that. They know what you want to see. Spyware comes from commercial sites that want to sell you to somebody else - and most porn sites only want you to keep coming to them, not somebody else.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    4. Re:stop porn scaremongering! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sites with the cracks by themselves are somewhat risky. The safest route I have found is to go to a large bittorrent site, and get a poular torrent. When you run a crack that came with a 700MB ISO that is seeded by 25 people and over 4000 people have downloaded, usually it's pretty safe.

  120. Having done freelance computer service... by infiniter · · Score: 1

    ...as well as my current job as a help desk technician, I have had a lot of experience with 'puternoobs.

    I did some work this summer for $35 an hour on my own, which is great when you can get it, and absolutely silly when you consider the utter simplicity of the tasks (install spyware killers, run them, drink Mountain Dew.)

    I, for one, hope people don't figure out how easy computers can be if you just try. I learned most of what I know by trial and error. If everyone knew that, I'd be out of a job.

  121. The only way... by Phaedrus420 · · Score: 1

    ...to get to Seasoned Professional is through Unqualified Amateur.

    --
    And what is good, Phaedrus, And what is not good... Need we ask anyone to tell us these things?
  122. It all depends by ZosX · · Score: 1

    If the computers he is working on are Dells and Gateways with stock configurations, chances are he isn't going to run into a great deal of issues on the hardware side. If he is like me, however, and is constantly piecing computers together from spare used parts, mismatched RAM pairs in every box for example, he is inviting hardware issues. I think we can safely say that we have gotten beyond the days of Win9x and its poor device driver model that openly invited a BSOD whenever a particular piece of hardware acted up. Granted, I know that Win2K and XP will BSOD in the event of hardware failure (and many other things), but for that matter so will Linux and just about every other OS out there. Nothing is bullet proof. What I am trying to get at is that hardware repair guys have indeed become nearly useless trade as most issues are software related (as this guy points out as well), but in light of that, there will always be a need for people that can diagnose and repair hardware situations. Out of the many home computers I've looked at, most needed RAM upgrades and what not (in addition to complete OS reinstalls), thus involving some level of knowledge of computer hardware. What stick of RAM would you use for an older gateway P2-400? PC100 would work right? Sure if it is low density. If you just told someone to buy a stick they'd have no idea what the hell to look for. The board won't even recognize most modern RAM you could just buy at best buy. I have a Dell P166 here I use as a file server. It won't take more than 64 megs of RAM because the wonderful intel chipset is hard limited at 64 megs. Great design feature eh? The board takes SDRAM too. If you stick 128 in it, it just recognizes the first 64. Yeah, a BIOS update never fixed the cap as it was hardcoded into the chipset. Guess dell never thought anyone would need to give a P200MMX more than 64 megs of RAM. Genius! The hardware has gotten somewhat simpler to deal with (automatic IRQ assigning comes to mind), but knowing what the hell is wrong when something goes wrong is a skill that will never go away unless hardware designs start becoming radically more simple, disposable, all on one PCB solutions. Video game consoles come to mind. The guys that do the hardware repair should hopefully be offering anti-spyware cleanups by now as I'm sure that they are well aware of how much their market has shifted within the last few years.

    1. Re:It all depends by Mesaeus · · Score: 1

      Are you talking about a TX chipset ? That one was limited to caching only the first 64 Mb of ram. Or are you talking about older chipsets like the VX, which won't accept chip densities higher than 16 Mbit ? In that case, you CAN use 128 Mb, you just need double height (32x16 Mbit chips) sdram dimms. Sure, they're hard to find, but they do exist and will work even in the earliest dimm sockets.

    2. Re:It all depends by ZosX · · Score: 1

      Are you talking about a TX chipset ? That one was limited to caching only the first 64 Mb of ram. Or are you talking about older chipsets like the VX, which won't accept chip densities higher than 16 Mbit ? In that case, you CAN use 128 Mb, you just need double height (32x16 Mbit chips) sdram dimms. Sure, they're hard to find, but they do exist and will work even in the earliest dimm sockets.

      Hang on. I'll look. :)

      thanatos:/var/log# lspci
      0000:00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 430VX - 82437VX TVX [Triton VX] (rev 02)

      Yeah, it is most defintely a density issue. According to Dell's own docs on the machine they claim that the chipset won't recognize more than 64 megs.

      I have tried 128 megs of low density and it wouldn't see past 64 megs, but I think these chips were even single height) so perhaps dell or intel placed such a limit to avoid compatability problems in the future or what I don't know. The double height chips are indeed hard to come across.

      Its too bad because it is a pretty nice board, more than adequate for a lot of tasks, but the lack of decent RAM is really an issue. I compiled Gentoo on an identical box just to see how long it would take. The base alone took roughly 4 or 5 days, but I can't remember. I gave up on even thinking about compiling X and its related libraries.

  123. Typical Computer (ab)user by MajorK0ng · · Score: 1

    When your A/C goes on the fritz do you fix it or call a "Qualified" tech? When your TV goes on the fritz do you fix it or call a "Qualified" tech? Whe your frige goes on the fritz do you fix it or call a "Qualified" tech? Call a "Qualified" tech if you can't fix your bloody computer yourself. Why does it sit in the shop use long? There seems to be more abusers than there Qualified" techs to work on them. Please get the kid down the street to work on your computer, it simply means you will be paying me even more money doing to repair your system. I would not even concieve of working on my car's engine these days. I will troubleshoot the problem but nothing more. Surf the net blindly and stupidly. Install every piece of software free or purchased you can put on your computer (even if you never use it; Because it is so cool!) Go ahead and give little Johnny and Susie full admin rights on your XP machine or better yet let everyone use the same profile! And don't forget letting the nieghbors use your computer, its not their system so why should they care what happens to it. Why because it means more money in my pockets. How about this as an amazing concept............ simply learn a few basic concepts about computers. It is my experience the people who have biggest and most problems with and on their PCs are the same people with the mindset of "Manual?...Instructions?......I don' need no stinkin' manual or instructions! To sum this rant up when all else fails RFTM (read this as aka the instructions, for those in California I realise computer don't come with manuals anymore, but there are a lot of good basic use books out in world for computer 101 and 102. Until then folks keep up the good work on fragging your systems it keeps me off the streets and occupies my evil little mind and I can use the cash.

  124. Golly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "a bunch of unqualified amateurs"

    I know you are, but what am I!

  125. Could be a winner for Firefox? by mu-sly · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hmm... perhaps you're onto something there! If we could advertise Firefox as "the best browser for viewing porn sites without screwing your PC", I wonder if even more people would want to install it?

    But then, I guess that might put you out of business, so probably isn't worth the hassle for you to install for people!

    1. Re:Could be a winner for Firefox? by wcrowe · · Score: 1

      The hell of it is, I will install Firefox (or Mozilla), talk to them about it, recommend they use it, and they'll still keep using IE.

      I heard one guy claim that he changed the Firefox icon to the IE icon, and solved the problem. ;-)

      --
      Proverbs 21:19
    2. Re:Could be a winner for Firefox? by anethema · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah totally. Think of some catchy slogan or something.

      "Firefox: Lets you fuck yourself without fucking with your computer."

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    3. Re:Could be a winner for Firefox? by mu-sly · · Score: 1

      LOL!! That's a winner right there! :-D

    4. Re:Could be a winner for Firefox? by mu-sly · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's the exact approach I used on my girlfriend's parents (my willing guinea pigs), and on my mum too.

      It worked pretty well, although I did tell them what I'd done, and that it was to help stop bad stuff happening to their computers.

      Hide the IE icon, replace it everywhere with a shortcut to Firefox (using the IE icon), set Firefox as the default web browser, and as a final touch, deny Internet Explorer the right to connect to the 'net using Zone Alarm, so it can't be used by "accident".

      As long as you remember to import their bookmarks, set up Flash and so on, it's pretty easy to make people switch. Once they've used Firefox a week or so, start showing them the cool extra features like tabbed browsing, adblocking and so on - it's a winning combination.

      My mum complained a bit at first "what's this Firefox thing that keeps coming up?" but she soon got used to it. I also switched her over to Thunderbird without too much trouble - it really is getting easy to help average people switch to more secure internet tools.

    5. Re:Could be a winner for Firefox? by daeley · · Score: 1

      "Firefox: Lets you fuck yourself without fucking with your computer."

      "Use Firefox or get screwed."

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    6. Re:Could be a winner for Firefox? by anethema · · Score: 1

      Or.

      "Use firefox and go fuck yourself!"

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    7. Re:Could be a winner for Firefox? by Adam9 · · Score: 1

      deny Internet Explorer the right to connect to the 'net using Zone Alarm

      Assuming Automatic Windows Updates will never fail..

    8. Re:Could be a winner for Firefox? by mu-sly · · Score: 1

      Assuming nothing, but knowing that I'm the only person admining that machine anyway, and would be there to step in in the event of that happening.

      I guess I could get hit by a bus or something... that would screw my plans! ;-)

  126. Coincidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just finished reading this and got called into my sister's room and asked to fix her computer, as it had just "decided to turn itself off". I'm no expert but I have to say this was well within my abilities... the plug had come out of the socket.

  127. I'm an unqualified amateur? by Zerbey · · Score: 1

    Wow! Thanks for the compliment! Isn't that the definition of a geek? Someone who takes stuff apart to learn how it works?

    Did you know that the Wright Brothers where amateurs? How about Thomas Edison? Yep, him too. Look what they accomplished.

    I spent 2 years at University, I dropped out for stupid reasons but to be honest, I know more than most of the people there who graduated. Unfortunately, that silly piece of paper is all most employers care about.

    1. Re:I'm an unqualified amateur? by dcam · · Score: 1

      I spent 2 years at University, I dropped out for stupid reasons but to be honest, I know more than most of the people there who graduated. Unfortunately, that silly piece of paper is all most employers care about.

      It is only silly because you don't have one...

      --
      meh
  128. Little money in this business (I've done it) by DonWallace · · Score: 2, Informative

    When I had a hiatus in my normal flow of software development projects last year, I attempted to build a sideline business in this kind of service. I was "convinced" by the older blog article posted here a couple of summers ago "Technical Self Employment is a Fat Paycheck Waiting to be Pocketed" as well as the Joshua Feinberg "Computer Consultants 101" course which I bought (my word on the latter: don't get it. I found it a cheap and quick "high" but very unhelpful in the longer run.)

    Short version: this is a REALLY crappy business. This "story" of low end tech support being a viable career option seems to have been floating around for quite awhile. The pundits claiming that it is a good refuge for a underemployed techie are full of crap. You're much better off temping at Home Depot if you need quick money, and continuing to interview for a normal professional IT or engineering job.

    The basic problems:

    Customers expect a quick, easy spend; the potential liabilities are huge; there is extremely little pricing or maneuvering room even for due diligence.

    What I found:

    The market is absolutely glutted with freelance computer techs. I have absolutely no idea how this writer got off the ground so easily. My chamber has about 30 out of a 800 business member base. All quoting the "we are your virtual IT department" line.

    As far as marketing: I had joined the chamber, I told every blessed professional and in-business person I knew, I gave talks, I advertised, I sent out a mass mailing of postcards. NOTHING. Or, very little business. I gave it a year.

    The clients suck. You really need a signed agreement with every business you deal with, in order to limit your liabilities, but many won't sign one. The same people who will blithely sign away their rights at the Quick-Lube station that fills their crankcase with moldy Kayro syrup will act like you're trying to scam them if you ask their signature on an agreement to begin work.

    Payment is a challenge. I let just one local business, an "ESTEEMED CHAMBER MEMBER", go without collecting on the date I was there. The jerk didn't pay me (a lousy $190) until he called me needing more work, several weeks later. Another business, a health club, stiffed me out of over 1/2 the billings for an onsite service call. And so on and so forth.

    Respect? You're treated like the janitor by most clients.

    More on due diligence: when a user has a really trashed out (virus/adware laden) PC, AND does not have any of the system recovery disks, AND wants their precious data recovered first... the amount of time it can take is essentially bottomless. You just can't tell them that it may be 3 hours to 15 hours. They will simply not accept that. And you just, absolutely do not know even the order of magnitude until you get into it.

    EVERY job I got involved some hideously unpredictable ball of mud.

    So you wind up looking like an asshole all the time because you can't predict within the $50 what the client may spend to bring their PC "back", so you wind up working like a dog to "keep it low".

    The reason nobody in the retail area wants this business is for the reasons I've listed. It's just too bloody hard to undo the damage that end users do by unsafe computing practices. That's why most stores' service departments just format and reinstall. Their attitude is "screw you and your data, tough luck" for a reason. They know that few will pay to have it "done right". And you can't run a business that is so marginal.

    1. Re:Little money in this business (I've done it) by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


      So far in my own low-end tech support business, I've seen some of what you have experienced.

      Nobody has stiffed me on a bill yet, but that's because I take cash and checks right there. Once I get a contracted business, I expect the month's money up front. Only way to go. Nobody can be trusted.

      You're right about the glut of techs, too. Craigslist in San Francisco has about 100 or more ads in their "Computer Services" area every day. However, most of the ads are really poorly done - which doesn't necessarily mean the tech is incompetent, but DOES mean they don't know how to market.

      I don't think joining the Chamber is really going to help your business (depending on the size of your town, I suppose - it would be a complete waste of time to do that in San Francisco for a low-end tech support business like mine.)

      And of course you need a signed agreement - for business AND home users. I copied the one that one of those national PC support franchise outfits use. I figure if it was good enough for their attornies, it's good enough for me. So far no one has refused to sign, and if they ever do, they get no service. Period. I always make it a joke - I tell them this agreement gives me the right to destroy their home in order to fix their PC, as well as establishing what my rate is. So far most people have taken it well.

      It's true that the problem with home users is that they expect miracles in one hour - because they can't afford more than that. I have cut my bill down or done an extra hour or so for free - but only for co-workers or other people I know. Everybody else pays full rate. You have to be hard-nosed, even though it's a pain to have to tell people that it's going to take four hours to clear their machine of 1500 pieces of spyware - not one hour. And I hate leaving somebody with a spyware-cleaning job only half done. You just have to be upfront about how difficult it is to get rid of some of this crap. (And no, Ad-Aware and SpyBot AND MS's new cleaner are NOT enough to get rid of everything.)

      You're right, it's a marginal business - especially at the rates I charge. I'm just hoping to get by financially until I get something better going.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  129. The Solution by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

    Computer manufacturers can solve all these problems in three easy steps::

    1) Replace the harddrives with read-only media.

    2) Mount temporary and swap files/partition in RAM.

    3) Weld case shut.

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  130. Not so sure by HangingChad · · Score: 1

    I upgraded the token Windows machine on my home network to XP Pro this weekend. My first experience installing XP. It's not bad. The product activation is annoying and with oddball hardware you have to hunt for drivers, a rock that NBM'ers throw at Linux. Overall I thought it was pretty nice. Better if I didn't have to spend so much time fiddling with it to keep it running right. Can't imagine how people not in the tech industry get by.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  131. Professionalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That's professionalism for you. That's what it is--a con game. Just sound like you know what you are talking about. If you express any reasonable, knowledgeable level of uncertainty, people will accuse you of snowing them or not knowing whats what.

    Confidence trumps competence.

  132. Buy a Mac... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and all your problems will be solved.

    1. Re:Buy a Mac... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only...

      They will only be begining!

      Now you have a system that is just as complex and prone to breaking, but only 1/50th the number of people that know how to fix it!

  133. In other news... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

    Researchers today reported that the sky is blue.

    Chris Mattern

  134. Re:What's a good HARDWARE diagnostic for PCs? by jimicus · · Score: 1

    Replace parts until it works.

    Seriously.

    It's not possible for a broken system to reliably report which parts are broken (think about it... if the system is broken, then it follows that the logic used to check it all works may also be broken).

  135. Article is sef-contradictory by Enigma2175 · · Score: 1

    From the article:
    There seem to be plenty of retailers only too willing to flog PCs to companies, but no-one around to help when the e-mail stops working or an essential spreadsheet refuses to open.

    These companies can't afford expensive support contracts with computer service organisations - and they haven't got the time to pack up the computer and take it to a shop, and then wait a week or so for it to be fixed.


    These 2 paragraphs directly contradict each other. Contrary to the first paragraph, there is somebody around to help when the essential spreadsheet fails to open. You are dealing with what the author claims are the most complex machines that a consumer is likely to own, yet he demands that the service be cheap as well. Cars are comparatively simple but shops charge an arm and a leg for a mechanic, why should computer mechanics be giving their service away? The author says the companies "can't afford expensive support contracts" and "haven't got the time" to take it to a shop. Maybe these people shouldn't be using these massively complex machines if they can't afford to run them. A factory manager doesn't expect his factory to run without maintenance. The fact is, computers ARE complex and take some skill to maintain. If you are not willing to pay for a qualified technician then you will get what you pay for.

    The reason there aren't more people doing home/small business support is because these types of customers always want something for nothing. If you fix a home user's machine, every time something goes wrong in the future YOU are they one they blame and the one that they call. Since they don't know how computers work anything that goes wrong with the machine is associated with your earlier repair. Dealing with established businesses is much easier because they accept IT as a cost of doing business are they are willing to pay for it.

    --

    Enigma

  136. Sned this to the Beeb by The+Angry+Mick · · Score: 1

    You send this in to the BBC as an editorial to the article. It's stuff like this that is too often left out of the mainstream press. Hopefully, the general public might take a bit of insight from your responses instead of relying on this poor sod's delusional assumption that computers should work like his toaster, and that tech support is a one question, one solution affair.

    --

    I'm not tense. I'm just terribly, terribly, alert.

  137. Re:What's a good HARDWARE diagnostic for PCs? by Mancat · · Score: 1

    Also, keep in mind that there is an 80K portion of memory that memtest stays resident in, and cannot be tested. I suppose it could be a freak occurance that there is bad memory within that 80K window.

    --
    hello dear sirs my name is jamesh i are india (bihar) can u guide me install red had linux 9?
  138. Re:The reason computer techs are unqualified amate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah. So you're a transplant from the auto mechanic industry?

  139. In-store repairs by delus10n0 · · Score: 1

    I've found most "in-store" repair places to actually be more incompetant than "amateurs" who come to your house. The in-store people have little/no training, and usually just take stabs at what might be wrong. I remember waiting in a mom&pop store the other day to purchase something, and listening to the repair tech. telling the customer what was wrong with their PC.. "yeah, you had spyware, so we installed Spyware Xterminator, it's a $40 product, so that's on your bill. I don't know why your CD drive was no longer recognized by the system, so we just installed a new one. That'll be $200." Sheesh.

    --
    Not All Who Wander Are Lost
  140. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  141. +1 Absolutely True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Succinct and true.

    1. Re:+1 Absolutely True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I totally agree after reading his post. Unfortunately, this is slashdot, and he used the word capitalist a bit too much.

      parent poster hit the nail on the head. My business thrives by recommendations of my service by satisfied customers. Only problem is it takes time to build clientele that way, but all good things take time.

  142. Antibiotics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One of the biggest problems with PC repair and support is that the majority of technicians treat all problems like some poorly-trained doctor, prescribing antibiotics by the handful rather than doing in-depth tests.

    When's the last time you saw a PC technician try to debug the problem at a low level? It's always just reinstall, reinstall, reinstall.

    1. Re:Antibiotics by Detritus · · Score: 1
      Who is going to pay for it? You?

      I was trained to do electronics repair in the old days, when you diagnosed the problems down at the component level and replaced the bad components. It required substantial amounts of training, a shop with a lot of expensive test equipment, complete technical manuals for everything that the shop repaired, and a substantial inventory of spare parts.

      Time is money. It is much cheaper to nuke the problem by attacking it at the highest level. That means that major assemblies get swapped out if they are defective, often the entire unit. For software problems, reformat and reinstall. If you didn't backup your data, tough shit.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    2. Re:Antibiotics by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

      Well I tried my hand at offering repair services, the mess people get Windows into means you rarely have much choice if the customer wants their machine fixing in a hurry.

      If they are willing to pay for the hours of work, then someone will be willing to spend hours patching up a messed up Windows install.

      If Windows wasn't so horribly complex (registry and a gazillion class definitions etc) it might be a bit easier to patch up.

      With Linux and Unix systems you can preserve the home partition and /etc, reinstall the system and software, restore /etc/, mount /home and you don't lose much.

      Yep, you can backup Windows but Microsoft is in a tricky position that it can't offer a really good backup system that is integrated into Windows for fear of being accused of monopolistic practises.

  143. It's not entirely the consumer's fault by Max+Nugget · · Score: 1

    The author of TFA makes some good points, even if he does insult the vast majority of us in the process.

    When Mom buys a new PC for her 12-year old son, or for herself, in their minds they are buying a consumer product. They have certain *expectations* of what it will allow them to do, and they have certain *expectations* that they can treat it the same as they would any other product they buy from The Big Retail Store.

    It's certainly true that consumers are generally irresponsible with how they use and maintain their PCs. But the blame for that belongs more with the companies that are so heavily marketing the computers to them, selling them that new HP Pavillion the same way they'd sell them a new TV.

    Consumers, and also, I'd say, many small businesses, have no understanding of the total cost of ownership for their computers. As someone else pointed out, a computer illiterate person or business that breaks enough things in their Windows installation will quickly find the cost of "repair" exceeding the price of the original computer.

    This, too, isn't so much the consumer or business' fault as it is the people selling these machines.

    Many posters have commented that consumers know to factor in costs of maintenance/repair when buying a car, dishwasher, etc, "so why don't they do it with computers?" The answer is, they do! The PROBLEM is, when Joe Consumer asks Joe Salesmen "what do I do if I need support," the answer they get is that Dell/HP/Compaq/Emachines provide unlimited, free technical support.

    They never mention that technical support will likely be of little or no help. But Joe Consumer *was* smart enough to consider the question of support, it's just that they were misled into thinking they had nothing to worry about.

    There is, of course, the separate problem of the "unqualified amateurs." But the problem is this: if YOU YOURSELF are not computer savvy, you're most definitely not in a position to determine if Kid Down The Street or Joe Consultant or Joe Job Applicant is computer savvy. So, yeah, you have no idea whether the person you're paying to fix your computer is "qualified" or not, and there's really not much way to determine this short of having them talk with a "trusted" computer person.

    This especially applies to pre-Generation X'ers. How many times have you heard some kid's mom rave about how their son is so good with computers or how she's encouraging them to major in computer science, etc, etc, simply because she sees him playing computer games all the time and this looks like such a complicated and foreign world to her?

  144. unqualified sure, but amatuer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I might be unqualified, but I'm only an amatuer until you pay me. After that, I'm an unqualified _Professional_. In my experience with car and appliance repairmen, god knows I'm not the only one of those around.

  145. Big deal by Leon_Trotsky · · Score: 1

    Why so much attention to a very badly written article? Here is a summary of Mr. Rubens masterwork: -Computers are very complex. -No one wants to fix them. -Mr. Rubens will fix them. -Lots of people fix them. -People who support them are unqualified amateurs. Ergo: Mr. Rubens is an unqualified amateur (Computer technician & author). -P

    --
    Ohhh! Pay Dirt! A pair of half-eaten choco-pants!
  146. Larry Save US! by bkruiser · · Score: 1

    Where the heck is Larry Ellision when you need him! Get the stupid PC out of the houses people. If I could just surf, or just do work instead of maintain my pc I would pay a monthly fee. If I didn't have to upgrade hardware and was just served a picture... that would be fine with my wife. When did the PC start to make sense? I have never understood why we would push a tool on users, instead of a product. A dishwasher cleans stuff, a fridge cools stuff, a monitor displays stuff... A computer is a tool for computation! We got away from computers when they became cool. Every person has to have one... a computer on every desktop has to improve productivity right? As for the guy who says porn is on every computer... That stuff is on computers because computers are designed to contain and diseminate not display! How much Porn is left on TV? Not much when you turn it off.

  147. "Get a Mac. Period." by BlueDjinn · · Score: 1

    I'm a website developer, but I also get called upon to do general computer tech support from my website clients on occasion.

    9 times out of 10*, when they ask my advice for preventing the same issues from coming back in the future (usually spyware/virus/etc issues), I give the same response: "Well, you *could* do X, Y and Z (NAV, AdAware, yadda yadda yadda) and pray for the best, *or* you could get a Mac."

    They almost never listen. Usually they think I'm joking, occasionally they at least pretend to take me seriously, but they almost never actually follow my advice.

    *(even as a die-hard Mac advocate, I recognize that there are certain realities in some cases--a professional accounting firm, for example, simply can't switch over to Macs since so much accounting software is Windows-exclusive. They could, however, at least *add* one Mac to their network, at the very least for emergency email/web browsing/etc when the rest of the network gets taken down by a virus/etc...)

  148. We need powerfull, well engineered comp + softwr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What we need is for microsoft and Intel to firstly, get out of the computer buisness alltogether. Then we need companies like apple to produce better machines, but what we really need, is well desinged open source hardware that is stable and not controlled by greedy companies like MS and Intel who's sole purpose for existing is to sell you hastily designed products that are desinged in such a fashion as to become obsolete rapidly and not be engineered to interoperat with older porducts and also to be very hard to keep functioning. The reason for the overcomplexity and non-interoperability and the phenominon of "buy our latest mag/book on windowz secrets" is because the product has been badly designed and designed in such a way as to break down after a given amount of normal operation. The fact is, is that we have the technology to make reliable hardware and software that can maintane itself without use intervention and to fail without crashing really bad. Our hard drive are massive now, we will soon have cheap multiple cpu motherboards, there is no excuse for a system to get corrupted and have no real easy way of fixing it. Open source software and hardware can solve these problems, or at least make things a lot smoother, these propriatairy companies are not good for the long-term growth and usefullness of the computer world. Economics states that companies that establish feilds, first set the standards and reap the rewards of doing so, it's just that both MS and Intel have done so and found out that giving us half-finished/buggy products and than re-invnenting the computer every five years, they could theoretically keep us on the purpetual upgrade/re-invent band wagon forever!!

  149. This guy is a typical "end-loser" by i41Overlord · · Score: 1

    1. Be an cluless end-user
    2. Hose your machine
    3. Try to fix it yourself and REALLY hose your machine
    4. Complain about those who actually do know how to fix the problem
    6. Write a story about it
    5. ...
    6. Profit

  150. A perfect summer job? by Great+Briton · · Score: 1

    When I finish my GCSEs (end of secondary school exams) in June, I'll have two months free before moving onto further education. I am now seriously considering doing a bit of this to get me a bit of money. I have great experience with computers, and feel confident that I could help a lot with peoples problems. But would people trust a 15-year-old with just experience to fix their PC, and even if they did, how much should I charge?

    1. Re:A perfect summer job? by ripbruger · · Score: 1

      I did this stuff over the summer, but I went to work for somebody. After that job was done, I still did quite a bit of it on the side, but mainly because I did so much before that people knew me, and I had a good reputation for getting things fixed. Not a bad job for a teenager, and it's good money. But if you've got a shop to work in, you can at least work with some experienced people who can help you along the way (provided you're willing to learn).

      --
      I can't spell ripburger
  151. He's actually not that far from the truth by NachoDaddy · · Score: 1

    Anytime someone writes something with abosultes, like saying everyone, all, etc., they're asking for trouble. However this guy is fairly close to accurate with the 'unqualified amatuers' comment.
    First, understand that there is no required certification to call yourself a computer repair technician. You just print up some Avery inkjet business cards and get a magnetic sign for your car, and you're in business.
    In order to get a job in IT or call yourself a tech for some larger outfits, maybe they will require an A+ cert of an MSCE.
    You can take a high school drop out and get them an A+ in under 6 weeks, no experience necessary.
    With another 3 months you can have an MSCE, and even then you know one OS, albeit the most common one. And you're still not schooled in the art of spyware removal.
    Compare this to the path to call yourself a licensed electrician or plumber (years as an apprentice, then state level testing). And also consider that the body of knowledge to become and electrician or plumber is much smaller.
    Or perhaps see how long it takes you and how much money it costs to become I-Car certified for the automotive world.
    And these are just the blue collar trades of the world, not something that requires 2 to 4 years of actual college.
    So even with what the computer repair industry considers 'qualified', I consider to be minimum knowledge to 'open the hood' and poke around.
    If PC repair was similar to the auto industry, a PC tech would have various certifications like ATA-66, ATA-100, ATA-133, SCSI, SATA, and the old grey haired guys in the shop would still have their patches for MFM and RLL. A hard drive swapout would pay a book time of 1.5 hours at $55/hr.
    But in reality the PC repair biz is learn on the fly by way of making mistakes, and charge by the hour.

  152. I Wouldn't Be Too Concerned by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 2, Informative


    about his "overqualified amateur" rant, since it was off the cuff.

    And his point was that appliance repair people get training in fixing a specific item, whereas computers have such varied configurations that it is nearly impossible to be an expert in fixing EVERYTHING.

    Or at least, I hope he understands that.

    I happen to be one of those "unqualified amateurs" doing home and small business tech support for low rates. I have twenty years in the IT field, so I know the basic facts about IT: nothing works and nobody cares. I have only been messing with current PC systems for the last three years, but I learn fast and usually have some idea where to look to solve a problem. But there's no doubt that the bewildering variety of screwups in both hardware and software make it very hard to do a quick, efficient fix.

    As an example from my own machine, a couple weeks ago I moved some partitions on the 160GB hard drive to make more room for my Windows 2000 and Windows XP root partitions (thankfully my Linux is on the other drive). Once I started accessing the partition that ended up on the other side of the 137GB barrier, both Windows crashed totally.

    I reinstalled and reconfigured, making sure I had SP4 on 2000 and SP2 on XP (which I had before the crash). After accessing that partition again, I discovered that neither OS could see files put in that partition by the other OS.

    To make a long story short, after nearly a week of wrestling with this, and being amazed at some of the bizarre behavior (all of which clearly indicated that at least one of the OS's simply was not seeing that partition in the "right" place on the drive), I discovered an MS Knowledgebase article that helpfully stated that Windows 2000 with Service Pack 3 cannot read the partition table correctly for "some" hard drives! (God forbid that MS tell us WHICH drives, WHEN, and WHY! Now I know! Big drives!) And I had installed 2000 with SP3 and THEN applied SP4 - too late, homes!

    Now, I spent a HELL of a lot of time on Google looking for ANYONE who had similar symptoms or a similar problem. Nothing - on the Web or in Google groups. I should have checked MS first, but even there it was not easy to find this particular KB article.

    Apparently, only under the specific conditions I had - a particular drive, installing 2000 SP3 first, then applying SP4, and possibly dual-booting with XP - did this problem arise.

    Multiply this by the tons of proprietary motherboards, manufacturer-tweaked BIOSes, "custom" hardware, scores of thousands of software apps, and add in a pinch of spyware - and how the hell can ANY tech ever hope to figure out what is wrong in less than two to four hours?

    Which, at the rate techs charge, is a hell of a lot of money for some home user who has, on a national average, maybe $100 disposable income for the month. It's no less of a problem for a business user if a critical server is out of action for that time.

    Another tech told me about trying to get a wireless LAN working for a small business down in Palo Alto. The frequency saturation in the 2.4GHz band was so bad there that the users kept getting kicked off or re-associating with the wrong access points. He tried everything - other brands of wireless, bigger, more directional antennas - nothing worked. Finally he had them buy a Cisco access point that was seven times more expensive than the ones they had been trying, which put out 100mw instead of 20. That worked - so far.

    For the last week, my AV has been turning off its email scanner for no apparent reason. No indication why, no good explanations on the company's forum. Since turning off the outbound SMTP scanner, it seems to have stopped doing it - so far.

    PCs are a nightmare today, no question about it.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    1. Re:I Wouldn't Be Too Concerned by Voxus · · Score: 1

      Your friend probably *should* have recommended devices running 802.11a, which uses the 5GHz spectrum. It's an older (and thus mature) protocol which is less commonly used, and thus much less crowded. Many 802.11a cards/access points are sold as Wireless A+B or A+G, meaning dual-use if you really have to have your 2.4GHz access.

    2. Re:I Wouldn't Be Too Concerned by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


      I can't remember if he said anything about that, but I suspect there was a reason not to. He's fully aware of all the wireless standards -he's teaching the course in them at City College!

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    3. Re:I Wouldn't Be Too Concerned by Voxus · · Score: 1

      Ah. It might be that the company didn't want to buy harder-to-find (and sometimes more expensive) .11a devices for every device on their network; budget can be an issue with them.

  153. WARNING!!! Anacronim Alert!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > The difference between auto mechanics and computer repairmen is that the mechanics have a union which forces licensing on its members to boost the price of labor.

    Then WTF is a MSCE?

    1. Re:WARNING!!! Anacronim Alert!!! by VendettaMF · · Score: 1

      Then WTF is a MSCE?

      Proof that the bearer was unable to actually learn about computers in any real or meaningful way, and may just about be safe to allow choose between "Obtain an IP address automatically" and "Use the following IP address" as long as there's and actual computer literate person around to correct it later.

      --
      kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
    2. Re:WARNING!!! Anacronim Alert!!! by Grommet+-+Space+Cade · · Score: 0

      MCP = 2 courses....
      MCSE = 5 courses....2 electives.....
      CCE = 1 course
      A++ = 1 course
      CNA = 1 course
      CNE = 1 course

      um thats my qualifications......still doesn't mean im qualified in software development, Linux, Degaussing, Hardisk recovery, Spyware, Spam, Web Design, Implementation and rollout of Ghosts etc etc etc.....

      Cars all work similarly....all have real world designs and specs....

      ever seen the design spec for windows?, what about Quicken, we find out what we know through RESEARCHING....this means google, Monitoring Tools Trial and error.....there is no qualification....

      I also fix DVD Players, Playstations, Xboxes, Fridges Printers Photocopiers etc.....why because i know how they work... most people beleive the labels that say "no user servicable parts"

      --
      WTF - Speak in acronyms already, i can't figure out what you mean otherwise boss
    3. Re:WARNING!!! Anacronim Alert!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Proof that the bearer paid certkiller.com $49.95 for the answers to the test.
      Certifications are a joke that only proves the bearer has the ability to memorize a bank of 300 questions and retain it for as long as the test takes.

  154. Impending doom from spyware by jfoust2 · · Score: 1

    Last summer I expanded my consulting business. Previously, I'd only handled small businesses. Then I advertised to fix home computers. The same afternoon that Yellow Pages advert hit my doorstep, I started getting calls and it hasn't stopped. 95% of it is spyware screwing up the Internet connection and slowing down the system.
    If there's someone under 25 in the house, it's nearly a certainty the computer is hosed-up with spyware. And no, porn is not always involved. There is nothing I can do to solve the spyware problem for many of these people. I can't pin-point how they got it. Sometimes you get a time and date but that's just a footprint.
    I can clean their system for $80-$100 but that only gets them back to square one and they will cheerfully run to step two, three and four. Microsoft AntiSpyware isn't sufficient. To clean many systems, it requires expert use of Hijack This, and I'll run AdAware and Spybot just to be sure. If I didn't run them all, I can't tell you how many times I've had to repeat the cleaning. Some of it is quite good at regeneration, and when they're starting-up in the registry with vague names that purposefully resemble Windows components or printer drivers, it's a hassle to Google them all.
    I can look the teen in the eye and tell them not to run KaZaA and Morpheus and to stop installing software, but they keep doing it, especially if Mom doesn't make them pay the repair bill. No one wants to run as non-admin. Even if they buy some $30 anti-spyware tool, it still pops-up and asks them to block or not. They are not often capable of answering correctly. And heaven forbid they try to fix it themselves - damn these system restore checkpoints to hell! All they do is screw up the system. If Microsoft can't adequately tell me what it's doing, I don't want it in the operating system.
    And what about the customers who are unhappy with your work because they're rapidly re-infected? Customers aren't logical and adept at computers. That's why they are customers and not computer experts.
    If it weren't for customer data being spread all over the computer, and the inane time-consuming complexity of reinstalling all their apps and drivers, I'd recommend a reformat in a heartbeat. But these days, many systems like Compaq don't even come with restore CDs - you have to take the time to burn five or six yourself sometime after you buy the system and before your HD dies.

    --
    Curator of the Jefferson Computer Museum http://www.threedee.com/jcm
  155. I already DO this for a living, and.... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    I can tell you, often times, the problem is largely a lack of knowledge by the computer user about the options they have available to them.

    Sometimes, yes, you get the people with the attitude of "I don't WANT to know how to fix this thing. I just want to pay someone to come out here when it breaks, and make it right again! I just want to USE it!" But just as often, I see problems like spyware/virii preventing the system from running well enough to get a product like Ad-Aware or Spybot installed successfully.

    Usually, you can get around that by booting into "Safe Mode" in Windows - but does Windows make it clear to people that holding down F8 at bootup will do that for them? Heck no! It's pretty much a "hidden feature", because Microsoft decided most people shouldn't see that option, lest it confuse them. So even the people who did their research ahead of time, and tried to install Ad-Aware, Spybot, etc. etc. can't always get that far.

    Many times, a customer calls me out to fix/clean up a system, only to say "Wow... You didn't really do anything I couldn't have just done myself. This stuff isn't so hard, is it?" They're right, of course - but what they really paid me for is my knowledge of which buttons to press, and which tools to install to fix things.

    This also brings up another point... It's insanity NOT to charge a somewhat steep price for this type of work, because more often than not, the customer gets an education from your repair work - and doesn't need to call you back ever again for a similar issue. If you don't get decent money up front, you're often just giving them an education in virus/spyware repair for well below the "going rate" for computer training - and teaching them how to do your job.

    1. Re:I already DO this for a living, and.... by SlightlyOldGuy · · Score: 1

      "Many times, a customer calls me out to fix/clean up a system, only to say "Wow... You didn't really do anything I couldn't have just done myself. This stuff isn't so hard.."
      Maybe you should obfuscate it a little bit: Bring up a command prompt early in the process, and type in something arcane like "netstat -an | more", and say "ah, aha" while scrolling through the resulting mess of numbers. It surprising how many UNIX commands also work in out-of-the-box Windows setups. :-)

  156. The truth - replacement cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one will pay the cost of fixing a trashed machine given that the human cost to fix it is $100 or more when that is 1/3 the cost of the machine.

    I always ask three things:

    1. Did you back up the data and when did you back it up?

    2. How many hours of work have you invested in getting all of your email, personal documents, pictures into the computer?

    3. Are you prepared to lose that data?

  157. If you're unwilling to learn ... by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 1

    Computers work best for people who are willing to learn how to use them. If you're not willing to learn because you're too lazy or busy, or if you just can't retain information very well, you'll probably have to call someone to help you.

    And no, there's no grand unified certification system for those people who can help you. Nor should there be: "computers" is too broad a term to be encompassed by a certification. The author is right - it's not like hiring an auto mechanic. In fact, despite the frequency with which computers are compared to cars, the analogy is terrible. Auto mechanics don't have to deal with spyware infecting cars, and don't have to perrform security patches. Computers are a much wider discipline; imagine if a car you bought three years ago were now doing entirely different things than were possible when you bought it. Different fuel, different controls, different color, different vulnerabilities. This would be the only way to make a car analogous to a computer. Computers are multi-function, and new functions arise all the time. There is simply no way to be "certified" for all of the problems you're likely to encounter on someone's home computer. You just have to stay informed, and be smart about how you use your system. If you fail, or just throw up your hands in defeat, you have to hire someone like me to be smart for you. Or stop using computers.

    Another interesting auto-mechanic-analogy observation: yes, computer techs may not be certified, but you also don't have to have a computer user's license. And you can "drive" a computer at any age. (The analogy keeps getting worse.)

  158. Finally! by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    "He then flames the whole world of computer repairmen as 'a bunch of unqualified amateurs.'"

    I've known this for 25 years..
    I've been repairing computers since waaaaay back, back before the IBM PC.
    In the early 80's, we were GODS... We were the elite few, we were the "healers"...

    We had to isolate a single flaky 64k ram chip on an AST (384k) 6-pack, or the 256k motherboard and replace it. That was nothing. I could read the POST error messages and know the exact chip out of the 90 possible chips. We had to isolate and repair defective capacitors in CRT's or replace printheads in dot matrix and keep continuous duty band printers running.

    A soldering iron was always on in our shop, we REPAIRED things. We didn't play swaptronics like these kids nowdays do. We had to hunt down and repair problems..

    I remember one dufus at a drafting company had decided to hop up his compaq deskpro 386 Autocad station all on his own without permission. It was company property but he wanted to be the unauthorized office superhero so he ordered a $900 80387 from Compaq then tried to install it himself. True brilliance, he installed it 90deg off and it cooked. It melted the legs into the socket and the mobo was dead. In a total panic he brought the machine to me and I told him that there was not much chance of repairing it but I would try. I found a replacement 80387 socket so I fired up my desoldering station and after many tedious hours, I removed and replaced the cooked socket and the mobo was back in biz.

    It cost him $900 for the first 80387, then $400 for me to repair the mobo, then another $900 for another 80387. The next one, he let me install it for him, I only charged him $20 to install the chip. The chips, he ordered those on his employers dime so he had to choke up $900 out of his on pocket to replace the chip he trashed.

    This was back about 1986, when $900 was a healthy chunk of change and a 20mhz 80386 system was still a few grand.

    Now, no one fixes anything, they swap some suspect crap around and chunk the suspect.
    Hell, I even did hard drive salvage, back in the days of 10mb to 20mb drives. It was nothing unusual for me to open a drive up with siezed bearings and move the platters into another drive to get the data off. It was a one shot deal but I did it on numerous occasions. I had no fear of taking on ANY level of repair.

    Now, you have numbnuts like these "Geek Squad" morons at Best Buy who can't find their own asses without both hands and a flashlight. Most of them have never once held a soldering iron, they don't know crap. They might be able to diagnose a dead PSU or a dead HDD or an unplugged display but they are really just junior grade virus cleaners.
    As the story tells, most problems are caused by windows. MOST computer "repair" now involves cleaning up windows problems..

    These kids these days, they are NOT technicians... I was REPAIRING computers before most of these "techs" were even born...
    Nothing offends me more than to go into best buy and some kid starts trying to chat me up with his buzz words, trying to impress me to make me think he's some sort of guru. I'll shoot him down in flames in 30 seconds or less. Last time I went in best buy I came close to punching the little asshole, I ended up going to the manager and filing a complaint, the kid followed me around the store harassing me about windows, I had asked if a particular part was Linux compatible and he went psycho on me..

    Really, Windows itself is what keeps these places going, there really is very, very little actual "repair" going on anymore..

    1. Re:Finally! by member57 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wow, I guess you had to walk uphill both ways to school in 7ft snow and didn't even get weekends off.... Give me a break, we would still be fixing computers old-school if parts were not so cheap. Why pay $400 on labor to fix a $150.00 monitor? Why pay $900 to fix a MB when a replacement is $50.00? I myself remember diagnosing & repairing, but to hell with that I would rather stick in a new video card or whatever, charge $30.00 and move on with my day. I'm glad those days are gone. Why in the heck would you go into Best Buy if you know there are Windidiots there anyways? I give them a gruff look and tell them I don't need help, thank you. Avoids lots of hassle. I buy 99% of my stuff online anyways, get what I want, without hassle. I for one applaud M$, I love Windows, keeps my family fed.

      --
      If Kerry was the answer, it must have been a stupid question.
      The UN - The largest "political" cause of death.
    2. Re:Finally! by tofucubes · · Score: 1
      • My opinion of Best Buy
      you have to understand the people, bestbuy caters to...suckers...
      the bestbuy people are JUST salesmen...they are a bunch of liars, if it wasn't for real pc people...these idoits would be making up words.
      1. How bad are they?
      no one and i mean no one from bestbuy knows what they're doing...after talking to those idoits, I EVEN feel confident. never expect rebates and pricematch; those concepts are theoretical, it's kind of like I can win the lottery, but will I? maybe but most likely not
      • unethical practices

      Best Buy wants to take away freedom of speech and they don't respect thier customers at all article

      and best buy for being so racist article "Earlier this year, Mr. Anderson apologized in writing to students at a Washington, D.C., school after employees at one store barred a group of black students while admitting a group of white students."

      • why i manage with my pc
      for windows problems
      I normally don't have problems with my pc simply because I love playing with apps and I have downloaded literally thousands of apps...so I can find a fixes for lots of windows problems or I can just go to some forum and ask at slashdot. but if things go really bad I can be brainless and but a knoppix cd in my cd drive. It gives me a sense of satisfaction to get the most out of my aging pc. I actually am very through looking for good software, so my pc has ran smoothly for years

      for hardware problems
      I know many hardware and vendor review sites so I can always snag something that won't fail me

      --
      Some people believe 1-1=3 and for the sake of being politically correct, we should respect their differences
    3. Re:Finally! by djh101010 · · Score: 1

      This isn't flamebait, mods, this is insightful, informative, and interesting. The guy is right on.

      Now, no one fixes anything, they swap some suspect crap around and chunk the suspect.

      If you think he's being offensive, apparently you're the board-swapping monkey type that he's talking about.

  159. Lots of Business but only if you like tedium... by BookRead · · Score: 1
    There's lots of business out there for those who want to do it, but it's rather boring as a regular thing. And arguing with folks who don't want to pay reasonably is a pain.

    I tried starting a computer support/repair business during my last stretch of unemployment. It can be done but the upside profit potential is pretty low unless you figure out how to exploit kids to do the work cheap or charge more than most people want to pay. And fixing problems yourself day after day gets pretty tedious, especially when you've been hired because the clients were too cheap to get real support.

    I'm sure one can make a living at it but once I got a "real" job I dropped trying to do it as a business without a second thought.

  160. Getting much worse lately by Nik13 · · Score: 1

    Fixing PCs used to be not so bad. You'd go over, have a look, fix things, explain (people would listen), and wouldn't mind paying (as PCs were more expensive back then and most ppl didn't know as much about PCs).

    Nowadays, they'd want you to do it for free (or just about), argue with you over stuff they don't understand at all (some people are really confused yet think they know everything better than you). Reinstalling windows is a pain (reinstall XP home and reactivate fore them? or backup activation? this thing only gets in the way of elgit customers). People don't ask anymore when a little something isn't working, they wait till it won't even boot without crashing to ask, so you have to fix a unusable PC instead of some bugs. And most of the time you gotta work with this new XP teletubbies look and crappy new start menu (I so hate these things), options taken away from you (like the new user manager that really sucks). People don't seem to understand anymore formatting means everything on their PC will be gone, and no, I don't want to reinstall their warez either. Spyware and viruses are a real pain adding to all this lately. And when you can't fix it anymore (too often as they wait far too long), then you gotta manually find and backup all their files for each user profile (including outlook info, IM logs, photos, mp3s... gigs worth of crap). It's become WAY more trouble than it's worth (unless you really charge money, but nobody wants to pay that anymore). And even if you spend 4h of your time for 20$, they'll still be ungrateful. And then when they get home they'll just hit some porn site with IE again...

    I only do it for a handfull of people now (family/close friends), and only if they don't mind changing a few things (like ditching IE). In some cases (like my mom who knows NOTHING about PCs) I've set them up with DeepFreeze so they can't mess them up anymore (and I keep a ghost image as well). Other people? The answer is no, find somebody else, not worth wasting my time.

    Nobody wants to do the job anymore but some amateurs... It's no surprise to anyone who's ever been into this before.

    --
    ///<sig />
  161. Pro/Amateur by fathed · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The only difference between a professional and an amateur is the fact that one of them gets paid.

    A certification or a degreee doesn't mean you know more than anyone else, it just means you sat in detention longer.

    --
    Intelligence is a matter of opinion.
  162. No the difference is by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    People are willing to pay, and pay quite a lot, for car repair. They seem to think computer repair should be free, or at most really cheap. Well, as with all things in in life, you get what you pay for. You aren't going to find highly trained professionals willing to work for $5/hour fixing your computer. You'll be lucky to even find amatures who'll do it for that.

    As an example: My air conditioner on my condo broke receantly. It blew air, but the air didn't get cold. Got it looked at and turned out it had worn out a part that caused the freon to leak out. When all was said and done, cost me like $400 ($150 for the freon, and labour at $75/hour). This seemed like quite a reasonable price to anyone I talked to.

    Now last week, one of the secrataries brought in her mom's laptop because it was screwed up with spyware. That's not in our pervue (we support departmental sytems only) but it was a slow day and she offered to pay. So I did all the normal things, tracked down the process that kept killing virus scanners and task manager, installed and run AVG, Spybot, etc, updated to service pack 2. I had it for a day and a half, but probably spent 2 hours of actual work on the system (most of them time was just letting it do things unattended). For that I wanted $50, which I got but she thought was kind of expensive.

    So wait, my time is worth less than 1/3 of an A/C repair guy's? We are both trained tech's right? Actually, I'm more trained than he is, but hey.

    Well the difference, of course, the cost of the device. The A/C is probably $6000-7000 to replace, more for a nice one. The laptop I imagine you could replace for under $2000, and it would be better than what you have now. The A/C will last 10-20 more years, barring unforseen problems. The laptop will by luck to make it 4 more, and if it does it'll be unbearably slow by then.

    Thus it's easy to see why someone is willing to pay so much for the repair of an expensive mechanical device like a car or appilance, but not for something like a computer. Given that many people (espically those that aren't proficient) have comptuers that themselves are less than $500, there's just no way they are goign to pay much for repair.

  163. Not all home users are cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I live in a resort town, which means there are a lot of folks who have their second (or fifth) home here. They have computers, they have computer problems, they're used to paying $50/hr to have someone walk their dogs back in Manhattan. They'll gladly pay that for computer service and tell all their friends if you do a good job, even if it costs them $200-$300 for a basic virus/spyware cleanup and antivir/spyware install.

    In the same town I've dealt with friends who've asked me to check out their computer, but then decided a $20 memory upgrade was too much money to make their machine work properly. Just make sure your prospective customers know you're going to charge $50/hr (or whatever) and you'll get the right clients. It's a strange but true phenomenon that people who pay more for your services will be less demanding and more satisfied, whereas those who are getting a great bottom-dollar deal always whine and think they are somehow getting cheated.

  164. Computer Repairmen by Atroxodisse · · Score: 1

    The problem with the vast majority of computer repair people is the complete lack of training. I have been using computers since I was 12 for the last 15 years. I admit I don't know everything but I have made it pretty much the focus of my academic efforts so I know a lot. I took computer science in university and in college so I not only know how to fix a computer, I know what, why, where etc about it. Having worked in the field I have met people who were good at it, as intuitive as I am when there is a problem to solve, and I have also worked with imbecils. I remember one guy who I asked one time how many kilobytes were in a megabyte to test him. I think his answer was something like four or something equally retarded. When I asked him how he could be a computer repair person and not know that he replied that he didn't need to know. Needless to say I got all the systems that were hard to repair and fixed them in half the time it took him to figure out one simple problem. He wasn't incompetent by far, he'd just worked on an assembly line before and never had to deal with troubleshooting. He threw the parts together and voila, next system. Anyone can throw a system together, it takes actual knowledge of how it works to repair. Which brings me to my point. A+ cert can get you a job as a repair person, but the test is juvenile, so I never bothered to take it. Plus, jobs repairing computers don't pay well as far as I know, since in most cases its cheaper to buy a new system than pay someone to troubleshoot and fix one when they charge $50 or $60 an hour at a store.

    --
    Read my short stories - You won't regret it.
    1. Re:Computer Repairmen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "or something equally retarded"

      As equally retarded as your spelling and grammar, you mean?

  165. I got your amateur... by member57 · · Score: 1

    I guess I'm an amateur with 20 years of experience... I guess those "professional" certifications that cost more per year than "professional" nurses, Firefighter, Police, EMT's, some doctors, Vets, CPA's, etc. don't mean jack? The average IT "Amateur" (or his/her company) spends upwards of $4K a year maintaining certs, exactly what does a "professional" journalist spend per year on certs?

    --
    If Kerry was the answer, it must have been a stupid question.
    The UN - The largest "political" cause of death.
  166. The IT Pro was probably covering his ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From a post earlier in this story:
    Economics hampers repair process
    ...
    The second reason is that home users have unreasonable expectations. Many seem to think that once I've touched their computer, I own it, and anything that goes wrong after that is my fault, not theirs.
    ...

  167. So, break out the soldering iron and FIX it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A few severed traces on a PCB can be repaired with soldering tools, a bit of wire, and a steady hand.

    Before everybody turned into "certified board-swappers", a technician was often called on to actually REPAIR things, rather than REPLACING them...

    1. Re:So, break out the soldering iron and FIX it.... by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      Unless you punch into an internal layer on a multi-layer board (usually this requires the board to be a 6 layer or greater board, as internals on 4 layer boards are usually power/ground planes) and sever something there. Then you're fucked.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
  168. Congratulations! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    You sir, are obviously an arrogant ass who lives in his own little world of superiority. Congratulations and good for you!

  169. A computer SHOULD be just a tool. by DogDude · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When was the last time you had to do maintenance on your screwdriver?

    And the fact that you have to do maintenance on a computer just means that the industry is still very, very immature. It SHOULD be just a tool. You shouldn't have to learn the intracacies of it just to use it. Case in point: cars. When was the last time you changed a distributor caps, or re-did the points on your engine or had service on your carbureator? Oh yeah. You haven't. Most people your age never have because cars are much more mature than are computers in terms of life-cycle, which is why it's easier to run a car (which is more complex than modern computers). It's getting better (Windows 2000 was a big breakthrough), and it's going to continue to get easier, and easier to use a computer, as it should.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  170. That was the whole reason I got out of consulting by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    For a little bit in unviersity, I decided I'd try and do computer consulting on the side. Not for big business, I knew I couldn't provide the level of support they needed. However I figured I could take on small contracts for individuals or little businesses. I actually was certified with basic low-level CompTIA certs (not a bad ideato get, since clueless managers know and like them even if they don't mean much). Figured I'd do web design, systems support, and basic networking since that's what I knew.

    Didn't have much trouble finding work, there were plenty of people and businesses that needed things done but weren't willing to pay what professional consulting companies charge. Seemed ideal..... Except they basically weren't willing to pay for anything. They thought they should get nearly everything for free.

    For example I got hired to do a company's website. Just a little local place. Cool, they provided me their logo they'd had designed, pictured of all their merchandise and so on. It took some effort on my part to explain that they also had to provide text, I couldn't write about products I didn't understand, but I got that in the end too. I in turn found a host, made a site, setup an online shop and so on. This I did for one flat fee, as we agreed upon in advance.

    Ok but the problem was, they seemed to assume that fee meant that I should then do any and all comptuer related work for free. I got a call because a computer wasn't working, so I came in and looked at it. Reason was it's powersupply was fried. I explained it needed to be replaced and they argued with me. Seemed to think I should be able to "fix it". Went back and forth and finally they said fine, leave it, we don't really need that computer. No idea why $50 for a PSU would have been such a problem.

    Ok, then I tried to bill them and they didn't want to pay. First argument was that my web design fee covered it. I explained no, as we agreed, that was for the design of the website, nothing more. Then they said ok, fine, but you didn't FIX anything, we won't pay if you don't do anything. I told them doesn't matter, my time costs money. You had me come in and look at it, etc. I think I finally got a little money in teh end, but not what I wanted and they were all pissy about it. This happened like once more before I just stopped taking their calls.

    It was the same story for the couple other gigs I did. The people wanted to nickle and dime every little thing and basically thought that I should work for free. Gee, well you know, as much fun as it is to work and not get paid for it, that's really not why I'm here. I eventually just gave up, and decided consulting was not my thing, at least until I was at a leve where I could charge some real money for it and work with people who are serious.

  171. Re:The reason computer techs are unqualified amate by Bourbonium · · Score: 1

    I started out my consulting business in 1999 by charging $40/hr. Then I obtained my certificationn and decided I could charge $60/hr. I stayed at that rate for 2 years, and then decided to test the market to see if my current clients would accept an increase to $75/hr. None of them objected and new clients feel that rate is quite competitive. As long as I prove my worth to them (and paying me as a consultant is cheaper than hiring someone full-time), they don't have any problem with that fee.

  172. Of COURSE they're unqualified! by Dagmar+d'Surreal · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not to state the painfully obvious, but the way most retailers work, it's no great suprise their employees say unintelligent things like "it's the gold contact that let you know it's a USB 2.0 cable because electricity travels faster through gold." (That is a direct quote, by the way!)

    The big chain stores charge customers $50 an hour (for in-house repair) to upwards of $100 an hour (for on-site work) and then turn around and give these hard-working individuals a whopping $10 to $12 per hour to survive on. The word "geeksploitation" comes to mind in a big way. It's this reason that most computer repairmen who tolerate this onerous situation (you can make $10 an hour doing data entry if you can just *type* fast) and hire on at these places are literally the bottom bidders in the system. That is just barely enough money to keep a geek in new hardware so they can learn the intimate details of troubleshooting it (which is cheaper than regular training classes, and includes employee discounts on the hardware). The majority of these poor, damned souls either stagnate, or tolerate the situation only long enough to get jobs at better places as either system administrators or network engineers, who are typically only marginally less underpaid.

    Your best bet to finding really skilled geeks is still word-of-mouth to find an independent contractor or small group of geeks acting in concert.

    Stop the geeksploitation!

  173. Re:What's a good HARDWARE diagnostic for PCs? by henni16 · · Score: 1

    Also, keep in mind that there is an 80K portion of memory that memtest stays resident in, and cannot be tested

    From the fun-things-to-do-with-all-that-video-ram-nowadays- department:
    A couple of years ago, someone at the German c't magazine wrote a little more-or-less-stable memory test program
    that used the memory of the graphics card to run from.

    I think it is this tool and needs to be unpacked to a bootable floppy disc.

  174. The corporate solution by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 1

    Works well.

    If someone's fucked up the software on their machine, zap it all and install from scratch. It literally isn't worth the extra time reqruired to try to diagnose and sort out the crap that gets installed. Course MS license bollocks can make this slightly more complex.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  175. Most of us ARE unqualified by spywhere · · Score: 1

    Before I 'retired' and struck out on my own, I earned my stripes as a Desktop Engineer, designing-- and supporting-- images to be deployed on thousands of desktops. I've repaired (no, that doesn't mean "re-imaged") more desktops than most of my peers in the business, and there are 10,000+ computers running my XP images as I type this.
    Most of the folks in the home PC repair business washed out of jobs like mine, either because of the recession or because they just couldn't hack it even in good times. Their skill sets vary widely, and are mostly quite limited. (As soon as someone goes after spyware with software, I consider them "quite limited").
    From what I've seen, the ones who are home-based and have low overhead tend to scrape along on what they can bill semi-honestly (if not competently). Those who f***ed up and opened storefronts are forced by their monthly nut to gouge everyone who comes through the door.

    For what it's worth, I charge $60 per hour with a one-hour minimum and a "can't fix it, it's no charge" policy. I don't haggle: anyone who balks at the price can call someone else.
    My previous employer is struggling to get me back, throwing money at me (and I've been saying no, so far).

    1. Re:Most of us ARE unqualified by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uhm, why would you not remove spyware with software.. going through the registry and scanning the hard drive for files and looking up crap on the internet.. uhm thats time consuming.
      I can run AVG and a spam scanner. and then get up and do something else. or use hyjack this if it is still giving me problems.. that will take seconds compared to at least a few minutes digging out spyware. Just because you can do something the hard way doesn't mean you should

    2. Re:Most of us ARE unqualified by spywhere · · Score: 1

      Just because you can do something the hard way doesn't mean you should
      I have NEVER found a 100% reliable, up-to-date spware remover. Many of the newest applets load before login and repair themselves in real time... these can only be cleaned up by booting to Windows PE or slaving the drive.
      I open IE, bring up the System Information applet, and look at Startup Programs and Loaded Modules. I sort the modules by manufacturer to find the suspicious ones. Then, I do what I must to disable the buggers. It ain't rocket science, it's not too time consuming, and it's much more educational than running an application could ever be.
      I use CWShredder to make sure that nightmare isn't hiding on the system, and AdAware to clean up after my manual removal.

  176. Simple answer. by azav · · Score: 0, Troll

    Get a mac.

    Call me a troll if you want but mere mortals can not deal with all of the crap that windows exposes them to.

    If they want to listen to music, email, surf, and write the occasional document, the mac IS the most painless way to go.

    If they want to game, or watch the latest in WMV, then they'll need to deal with the pc world.

    I work on win 2000 all day but take my Ti with me most everwhere I go. No spyware, popups, or viruses and with PithHelmet, almost no ads on web pages either.

    Use your money and time wisely.

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
  177. Its not just a tool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's like complaining that a book is too hard to use because you have to spend all this time learning how to read. Some things have a certain amount of complexity and people need to learn. The car analogy is great, except that you aren't expected to repair your car or computer. You do have to learn how to drive a car, and you should have to learn to use a computer. Learning simple things like "read messages that appear on your screen instead of immediately clicking the ok button", and "do not install random shit that you don't need" would solve 99% of people's problems. The fact that people don't treat computers with the same respect they do cars is the problem. People don't tend to shove random fluids in random holes under their hood and expect their car to work, but they do the equivelent to their computers all the time.

    1. Re:Its not just a tool. by jrc · · Score: 1

      Respect their cars? Check your local paper's blotter file for DUI arrests. Do a quick sampling of friends and families for how often they've rotated their tires compared to the recommended rotation schedule. How is it you can still find people stranded and walking to the nearest service station for a gas can because they gambled with the fuel gauge reading? Ever see some vehicle billowing smoke from the exhaust and wish you could ask them when they last had an oil change? Yeah, plenty of people respect their cars, but their is still a great number that just see it as a tool that gets them from point A to point B. Same for computers, just something that lets them email family or friends, write a letter or resume, play some games. Any recommended maintenance is in one ear and out the other.

  178. what's wrong with a amatuer? it's not rocket sci by iamhassi · · Score: 1
    what exactly is so complicated about PCs? It's not like he's programming them or anything, he's just installing software. Need a new power supply? Unscrew & unplug original, put new one in, wow that was hard. There's no soldering or replacing ICs anymore, you just replace bad components which, at most, requires removing a few tiny screws.

    from article:
    "Computer software is very, very complex. Stick a load of it together on a computer - itself a pretty complex beast - and you've got yourself a system which is more complex than anything else you are ever likely to own."

    so? that's not saying much, what's he comparing it to, the toaster oven? I'd say a car is a much more complicated beastie, you're getting poor mpg (equivalent to ur computer eating resources) and what do u do? Sorry no Task Manager to see what's eating resources, no MSCONFIG to disable startup processes. And most of us would be fine with your buddy down the street messing with car to see why it's not running right wouldn't you?

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  179. Re:hurrah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are an unqualified amateur, sir!

  180. A+ Certification a Joke by ServerIrv · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you want to check on a local business, you can check the local BBB. You know that a doctor with a degree from somewhere besides University of Phoenix has a reasonably good chance of being competent, but there is no way to prove to the average consumer that you are not an amateurish hack. I've been working with computers for the past 15 years (competent for last 10) and normally know what's going on, or when I don't know what's going on, where to turn to so that I don't crap up the situation even more.

    A few years back I took the A+ Certification test to prove myself. The only thing that I proved was that the A+ Certification was a joke. I passed the test with flying colors without studying, or opening one single "10 easy steps to A+ Certification Glory". Not only did I not have to study, but I found a few questions that had no/incorrect solutions. One question had a picture of the connection riser of a legacy motherboard, and it asked to identify the USB port, except there was no USB port in the picture.

    I find traveling or visiting friends to be a hassle because I seem to be the roaming tech support man. In the past 10 years of working on other's computers, I have only had to work on three Macs, and I don't have enough fingers/toes/hairs to count the number of Windows machines from which I've removed spyware and general crap, or changed settings that the user had no idea about.

    Whenever I encounter a Windows machine connected directly to the internet, I refuse to work on it unless they make the small investment of a hardware router. I know that a router is not the end-all solution, and doesn't block things from phoning home, but it shows them that there are associated costs with computer security. Also, a few minutes explaining a few specific security functions can go a long way.

  181. Who to call by yuri+benjamin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From the article:
    When a domestic appliance goes wrong, you can ring a repair man. When your car breaks down you can call the garage. But when your computer system goes wrong, who do you call?

    In my experience, most people call their ISP, even for problems that are not internet related. How do I know? I work for an ISP. And they expect their ISP to fix it. They see their ISP subscription as a service contract. When, after some questioning, the ISP helpdesk operator ascertains that the problem is not internet related, or not covered by the support policy, then begins the hard part of convincing the customer. It's often easier to tell the customer to reboot.

    --
    You make the mistake of thinking you can educate the fundamental stupidity out of people. You can't.
  182. $499 computer + spyware = overloaded computer by ServerIrv · · Score: 1

    In the auto industry you can usually tell from the outside when a car is severly underpowered, but that is not the case with computers. You will be hard pressed to find anyone that would take a cool looking Cavalier with a body kit over a Porsche, but you will find people at "insert local retail shop" that buy something completely underpowered at an overpowered price.

    I personally believe that a lot of the blame rests on the retail shops that promise everything except a back massage from their bargain bin computers. If you take a computer that is barely over the minimum requirements to boot the operating system without creating a massive swap file, then add a bunch of bundled programs that load on startup, then spice things up with a piece of adware/spyware/trojan, what else can you expect besides angry users.

  183. Amateurs??? by Khyber · · Score: 1

    "there's no computer equivalent of a qualified service engineer who you can get to come around and fix things." BS. It's called A+, N+, MSCE. LOADS of certifications to prove the qualifications. This guy must be a rank amateur himself to not know what certifications exist out there. And computers aren't inherently complex? What another load. YOU figure out how to arrange 50+ million transistors on on tiny circuit so that they work. This guy's the equivalent of Al Gore.. "I invented the Internet"

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re:Amateurs??? by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

      I generally find 'A+', and 'MCSE' to be 'anti-certifications'. Eg, someone who thought they could use a paper certification they get for $20 and taking a test that they memorized the answers to in place of actually knowing wtf they are doing. Plus most of them are usually MS-weiners anyway. The solution to all Windows problems is to *remove* Windows. The solution to all Windows virus problems is to *remove* the virus (which is Windows itself).

      But other than that, yes this guy is something of an idiot.

    2. Re:Amateurs??? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Actually, Windows isn't that bad. The big problem is M$ tries to integrate everything and give you stuff that you do not need, all bundled with the OS. This leads to too many potential security holes. Were Winblows more basic, like core operating files and the DX API, and a basic GUI, and then let everyone else make programs for it, open source or no, it would most likely be a good-working OS, and secure. Check out all those updates, most of them are related to software that comes bundled with Windows as opposed to core files and so on.

      And in reality, The A+ certification is more useful than most people realize. It's good for the absolute basics of computers, which happens to control every single complex function the computer can perform. A+ is the pure hardware level, which most average people can't fathom to begin with. MCSE is a big joke, you're right, but at least people who take it can solve Windows problems, since apparently, the MCSE certified people do much better workarounds or patches than Microsoft themselves does. Pretty sad, isn't it?

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  184. not comparable to other industries by smash · · Score: 1
    Fixing computers isn't quite the same as fixing a car.

    When you fix a car, you typically get a warranty on the parts, and they fail in a limited number of ways. Software is different.

    You don't get, for example, replacement brake pads that mysteriously decide to cause your engine to spontaneously explode.

    Now, given that, the vast number of un-related problem causes, and speed of software development (compare cars we drove in 1980 to today. now compare software/pc hardware) - means that

    1. no matter how much you are trained, a large amount of knowledge becomes useless by the time you're trained in it
    2. as a result, troubleshooting is more a matter of "common sense" and a process of elimination than training
    This is why pc techs are "unqualified"... :)

    smash.

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  185. Solution for nearly every problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    start -> run -> msconfig

    Turn off all services you don't need or understand.
    Turn off all programs loaded at startup that you don't need or understand.
    Install ZoneAlarm
    Defragment at least monthly.

    Windows will be running lean and mean
    (XP home uses less than 86MB RAM used on a 512MB laptop)

    For the tech savvy - get a cheap (PII+) 2nd box with 2 nics and install SmoothWall
    That OS serves as a firewall + DHCP server and does wonders for the home network - no router necessary, just buy a switch for the local network.

  186. Old chinese proverb... by kjots · · Score: 2, Funny

    Man who annoy computer fixer often have broken computer.

  187. Software CAN hurt computers by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 1

    There are viruses that can write junk to your BIOS' flash ROM. DoS attacks can cause systems to overheat. The malicious packets are made with software. GPU's and CPU's can be overclocked with software. And while I've never heard of it happening, emulators like MAME could theoretically damage your hardware. The disclaimer for MAME says that the author isn't responsible for hardware damage due to usage. I don't think it's likely, but apparently, it's possible.

    1. Re:Software CAN hurt computers by friedmud · · Score: 1

      Sigh....

      I knew when I wrote that sentence that anal slashdotters everywhere were going to have a field day ;-)

      I'm talking about 99.9999% of the software out there will do absolutely nothing to your hardware.

      All these posts are actually part of the problem! All users hear about is "DONT RUN ANYTHING CAUSE IT _COULD_ FUCK UP YOUR WORLD!" and then they're scared to do ANYTHING themselves... which actually contributes to the problem because doing things yourself includes things like installing anti-spyware programs, firewalls and alternate browsers.

      I know you were just trying to give some extra info... and you are correct that there is a TINY slice of software out there that (besides viruses) no normal house-mom is going to ever come into contact with... that COULD do some damage under odd circumstances with a full moon in the sixth quadrant.

      The point is that all of that junk is overplayed and users need to relax and explore... while keeping good backups ;-)

      Friedmud

    2. Re:Software CAN hurt computers by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I do tend to go overboard sometimes. I should have mentioned that such software pertains to very rare or extreme circumstance.
      You have to admit though, it would be pretty funny to see granny overclocking her water-cooled system with software.

  188. OF COURSE HIS PHONE WONT STOP RINGING by gorehog · · Score: 1

    He's not charging a call out fee. See, this guy will go listen look at anyone's computer. Please note, he also did not quote his rate for repair work, he did not try to make a living off of his work. He also has not mentioned how many folks actually took him up on his offer once they spoke to him. I've tried this. Most people realize that for the price of parts and labor they can buy a new computer. OR they dont want to pay for three hours of work while I go to their homes, install a piece of software, scan, repeat.

  189. Mark my words! by ajbaudio · · Score: 1

    Fifty years from now, desktop support will be a skilled trade, just like mechanics, plumbers, carpenters, and electricians. IT training will model the apprenticeship programs found in the traditional trades, and states will require licensure to practice computer support. Thousands (or millions) of help-desk workers will be represented by unions seeking to end unfair labor practices at major corporations or government institutions. The rest will become part of major contractors doing only computer work.

    Fifty years from now, all the voodoo and black magic that allude and confuse "end-users" will continue to do so. But no one will consider doing their own IT (just like no one tries to build their own house). They'll just call someone else...just like they call a mechanic, plumber, carpenter, or electrician.

    1. Re:Mark my words! by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

      Unless you are entirely inept, rolling in the dough, completely lazy, or some combination of all of the above, calling a 'mechanic, plumber, carpenter, or electrician' isnt always either desirable or feasible. Lots of people 'do their own' work in all of those areas. In fact lots of people *do* in fact build their own houses (some contract out large work such as excavation or pouring a foundation, but some do that on their own too).

  190. Domestic Computer service is simple. by chris_sawtell · · Score: 0
    I just say: "To get rid of your computer problems get rid of Windows"
    Some people just look at me as if I'm quite mad, & end the conversation. That's fine. I don't have to bother with them any more.
    Some say: "What do you suggest"?
    I say: "Linux, would you like to have a demo?"
    So I pop a Knoppix LiveCD in the slot and let them have a play.
    For people who only need a bit of Web and Email and a typewriter simulation that's the answer in 5 minutes. If their modem is not supported by Knoppix sell them one that is. An external modem is far cheaper than having someone skilled at the IT support craft footle around for hours trying to rid a Windows hard drive of every item of malware spew.

    If the customer is interested in going further I explain that they will have to expend either time or money to install and set up a custom Linux distribution.

    All this nonsense simply because flippin Microsoft make every user an administrator by default. The're irresposible nutters who should either be thrown in the slammer, or commited to an asylum. Don't consort with them, or you'll get corrupted.

  191. They can do a lot more damage than that! by FlyByPC · · Score: 1

    Not only can untrained techs cause obvious damage due to a slipped screwdriver etc, but if unaware of ESD damage, a tech can cause random failures of components that can be maddeningly difficult to diagnose. I've seen systems pass intensive memory tests with flying colors half the time, and lock up the other half. No apparent pattern, until I would check the prior work orders and see that Joe Schmo was the last tech to work on the box, last week. (Joe's name has been changed to protect the clue-challenged, of course.)

    --
    Paleotechnologist and connoisseur of pretty shiny things.
  192. complexity can be tackled if designed right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not all complex objects are hard to maintain or repair. It's the way the complexity is put in the design, that is the problem.

    One of the problems with the popular OS and many of its application software is that it wasn't designed from a clean slate, with modular structure to manage complexity. It was created with compatibility and marketing in mind.

    Hardware design is more stringent in quality and maintenance compared to software. That is why even complex CPUs don't fail as often as simple application software.

    So, it is not the software itself that is hard to maintain by nature, it is how people designed them.

    The more monolithic softwares are, the more difficult they are to manage. They should have been designed with replaceable components with fault-tolerance, with standard interfaces between components, just like replacing parts in a car when they are faulty. You don't replace the whole car just because one part is not working. But in software, you have to upgrade the whole piece, rather than a small part of the software.

  193. i should do this... by mike518 · · Score: 1

    i should definately do this... i may not be a master programmer, but i can definately figure out how to run ad aware and how to hard reset a crashed machine. Im amazed that people still havent figured this simple stuff out yet... not even to mention installing ram and cards. come on people! :-)

    --
    Mike
    I heart the RIAA & MPAA, im sure its mutual...
  194. Re: People are lazy and do not persist. by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

    Prior poster said:"You are being unrealistic because you assume it takes them the same amount of time to learn as you.

    My parents have been working at this hard, for months now. But even the simplest aspects of using a computer have escaped them until recently. These people, god bless them, don't understand that a document, a batch file and a program are the same type of thing on the hard drive. It's just a question of the contents and whether the computer tries to run it or not."

    Let's face it many adults are stupid and many people don't want to learn how to use computers, I was entirely self-taught and as a non-programmer (before I learned programming) I knew how to use dos like the back of my hand because I persisted and spent the time necessary to learn the foundational concepts of how file systems and programs worked. All it takes is effort and a decent memory, to learn the conventions of the system. Dir / p or dir /s, or dir *.exe (find all files with a .exe extension).

    The problem is computers cannot be made simpler to use until processing power increase. Right now we are at the manual use phase, we can't really talk to them or get them to understand our thoughts or conventions.

    The people that are smart enough to use programs made for computers, and fix them are not in anyway dumb they are just more persistent and have better memories then other people.

    Personally I think it's sheer lazyness, people should learn DOS/command line systems and filesystems first in school, then go to windows because without that basic dos background you don't really "get" how windows works because it's based on the basic filesystem concepts most people learned from the Dos and windows 3.1 days.

  195. Computers are not a right, but rather a privilege by Gleem · · Score: 1

    In what the writer writes in his article in some ways is an unjustified view of a computer technician. Though I agree that anyone can claim I can fix this, there are those who really do know what they are doing. In my personal experience as being a computer technician, I have trouble-shooted over a 1,000 pc problems and have come to the conclusion that their are three factors that most often are the primary reason why their pc is not functioning. 1) The computer user is under the assumption that they can get something for nothing and will use P2P programs or go to web sites to obtain such items not realizing the true harm of this approach for a free lunch. 2) Computer Users simply are unaware or do not comprehend how important it is to be user aware in understanding how applications work / hardware. (For example: most people will install 2 to 3 anti-virus programs on their pc think it will make it more secure but fail to understand that these anti-virus program will just battle each other hence a zero-sum game). 3) Sometimes the problem is caused not through user error but rather through hardware problems. Though this 3rd reason takes the blame off the user, I must add that how computer take care of their pcs dictate whether or not computer hardware will fail. (For example, if you never clean your case and you allow dust, dog hair, cigarette smoke clog your CPU fans and Power supply, then well your just asking for it. At the place where I work, my co-works and I always joke around about the classic ID-10-T error that most clients experience in their computer problem, but in most cases it is made clear that they simply just don't understand nor do they care to understand. For example, a client came in to the store and told me her computer was constipated but when I tried to help her with the correct terminology she did not understand to help identify what her problem was. In looking over the years in the technology that has come out in which is supposed to fix simple problems such as "plug-in play" or "system restore", I have found that these same tools are what cause the majority of the user problems. Too many people rely on these tools in which they do not understand the logic behind what they do and because of it are ready to pull their hair out when all their data is gone. Though the simple solution is backing up your data as you go about your week, computer users do not see a need in doing so because they think the big red panic button is going to make things right. I guess all in all, what I find humorous and clearly do not understand is that when my technical staff fixes the computer problem, and in most cases we have to remove those programs that got them in there in the first place, clients will complain about it because we prevented them from doing what they want to do which is get something for nothing. Though I try to explain to them what these programs do, they don't want to hear it and call you incompetent.

  196. I fix computers for beer! by felixdzerzhinsky · · Score: 1

    I fix my friends computers and get paid beer and dinner. My usual repair methodology is to back-up their important word, photos and music and remove the malware infecting the computer. Once Windows is removed I install the Linux of their choice, run the Bastille script and give them a quick tutorial on the basics of the file structure usually setting up a download, documents, music and photos folders for them. I show them where Firefox, OpenOffice.org, gaim and how their multi-media works. Then how to keep it patched. I have done this for everybody from an 80 year old neighbour to a Philipino family who just been introduced to computers. Once the system is up and running I rarely get called. I suppose if I was a good businessman I would reinstall windows and get more beer. But they are my friends after all!

    --
    "Flags are bits of colored cloth that governments use first to shrink-wrap people's brains..."
  197. Re:The reason computer techs are unqualified amate by iainl · · Score: 1

    88 Dollars an Hour? Do the users end up in 1955 a lot?

    --
    "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  198. Typical BBC.. by duncangough · · Score: 1

    So afraid to make a judgement either way ;-)

    "He then flames the whole world of computer repairmen as 'a bunch of unqualified amateurs"

    imho that's a great TV show right there, not setting up dodgy builders and plumbers and exposing them as fraudulent money-grabbers, setup your average IT worker who earns 20k point-and-droooling their way through Windows Updates all year long.

  199. Nonsense. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Computers and software have got away for far too long with shoddy design practices. "iti is good enough" has been the mantra of this industry for far too long.

    I have got a life. I don't have time to download and inztall the firewall, the antivirus, a new browser, a new email program (you don't use Outlook I hope).

    I bought a computer. it is suppossed to be fit for its purposes. Why it is not?

    When a certain item was new it was OK to demand more involvement of the final users since the technology was not fully understood.

    Now the computing industry is a mature industry, the end user should not need to be policing his machine, the manufacturers should provide the necessary tools to ensure the machine is safe to use.

    That is why I like Linux. Install and ready to go, firewall configured, viruses unlikely.

    What you are requesting is that people continue their masochist relationship with their tool. Sorry, but I don't buy it.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  200. The simple fact of the matter is... by Biomechanical · · Score: 1

    When you own a device - regardless of it's complexity or sophistication - you owe it to yourself to learn, at the very least, basic maintenance for that device, and it's not just computers or cars.

    Go back two hundred years. Any man that owned an axe would either know how to look after it, lest the handle split, the head fly off, the edge became dull, or some other issue.

    That axe was important, as any tool is in a society where DIY isn't just a hobby, and people knew how to look after their tools.

    Today we still have axes and hammers and other manual tools - and good crafts/tradesmen still look after their tools - and we also have more sophisticated devices like VCR's, Televisions, Computers, Cars, etc...

    And today, perhaps even more so than yesterday, it still pays to learn the basics of maintaining your PC, car, or VCR, if not in time then in money.

    How much does it cost to take a computer to repair shop near where you live, or have someone come and fix it? What if you knew the problem was as simple as defragmenting the hard drive?

    I am still amazed by people's apathy towards the devices they use in everyday life, and even more incredible, their general lack of a plan in case something fails.

    When the photocopier "breaks", and no-one knows what to do or who to call, the amateur who knows the answer is the hero to the ignorant.

    --
    His name is Robert Paulsen...
  201. Re:The reason computer techs are unqualified amate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You all are way too low. Last time I was for-hire, it was $360 per hour, two hour minimum. Parts extra. Time and a half for service outside of 8-5. That kept most of the pesky relatives and neighbors off my back unless there was a thesis paper on the line. Of course, by my standards, 4G of ram and 8 processors is a cute little box.

  202. Compare the ratios though. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The number of people who treat a car that way is WAY smaller than the number of people who treat computers this way. And if they really thought it was just a tool to let them email, write a resume and play some games, they wouldn't install comet cursors and desktop strippers and all the other retarded shit they install that has nothing to do with email, resumes or games.

  203. "Equivalents" of Paul Rubens' Work by http101 · · Score: 1

    The little bitch is lucky no one has strung him up by the balls and beaten him like a piñata at a 7-year-old's birthday party. If he wants to spit on our careers, I'd like to reciprocate and call his journalism at least one of the following:

    1) "birdcage liner"
    2) a submission for a "glorified essay contest"
    3) a misplaced "back page column"
    4) "shredder food"
    5) a "desperate plea for attention"
    6) something I would read in the bathroom just before realizing I'm out of toilet paper. (think about this one...)
    7) "waste of ink"
    8) "confetti fodder"
    9) "blurb"
    10) something slightly more vivid and exciting than high school biology notes.

    --
    -- Game Developers: Stop porting badly-textured games from crappy console systems!
  204. Fucking idiot by hesiod · · Score: 1

    He talks about sending your car to a professional garage, your washer to the "Maytag man" or whatever, but then when it comes to computers, he gets mad that it's not something your average idiot can fix? What a double standard.

    This article is worthless, and the writer has no skill in logic.

  205. Re:The reason computer techs are unqualified amate by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    Wow

    I should get back into the computer field. After the .com crash I could not find anywork. I only have 2 years of experience and I am both A+ and MCSE( shudder) certified.

    I now work 6/hr and live off food stamps while I go back to school.

    I wonder if the demand is back?

  206. Re:The reason computer techs are unqualified amate by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    HEll compared to what I am making now I would happily accept 10/hr!

    It beats minimium wage anyday.

    I am wondering if the IT industry has any demand for us again after I got laid off in 2001.

    People here are whining about 40/hr. Its unreal. I know people who make under $10,000 a year and support a family where I work. Really 12/hr is a ton of money and is luxury compared to what the rest of America makes.

  207. Re:Last Call. by The+Bungi · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    You submitted the article because it lets you waddle in your pointless "M$" bashing yet again. This is a non-story. The guy is an idiot. The "editors" accepted it because they were running low on their borg quota for the day, I'm sure.

    BTW, nice to see you're posting at -1 now. I guess what goes around comes around.

  208. Stupidity finds a way by phorm · · Score: 1

    I'll take for example, my grandparents' computer. They needed a new CPU fan, so I sent them up to the local shop with a written description of the type of motherboard/CPU. Of course, the shop-monkey, instead of giving them a small heatsink+fan combo at $12.99 for their P233MMX, gives them a nice big one meant for a P3/P4. And of course, rather than waiting for me to install it like I told them to, they try themselves.

    End result: "We tried to fix the computer and now it doesn't work."

    It seems they removed the "flat grey thing" because the new heatsink wouldn't fit /w it on (flat grey thing being the CPU), and the oversized heatsink bent/scraped several caps near the CPU. Luckily none were destroyed completely, so I was able to repair the outer sheathing, get a proper heatsink/fan, and have the thing working again.


    Yes, it's harder to put a cord in upside down, but I'd not underestimate the many ways somebody can screw up a computer. Remember, these same people can't even program their VCR's

  209. Re: People are lazy and do not persist. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was entirely self-taught and as a non-programmer (before I learned programming) I knew how to use dos like the back of my hand because I persisted and spent the time necessary to learn the foundational concepts of how file systems and programs worked.

    Um, do you understand that you really, really *wanted* to do all this? That it was a hobby for you, something you were interested in? Because that's really how it looks like (from my arm-chair).

    And then you call people lazy when they don't share your passions. Hey. Not everybody is a born slashdotter. (Thank several gods.)

    There is nothing natural or intuitive about DOS or other CLI systems. There is no reason why people should crawl through those hoops. People should have systems that are easy to use for all kinds of creative (productive or just fun) stuff, while easy to keep secure and running well. Oh wait, Apple sells those.

    You have a rather deep-reaching concept of "learning to use computers"... and perhaps you were a lot more of an enthusiast (thus, a rare type of person) back then than you make out to have been... no offense, I hope :)

  210. No fair! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RTFA Dork!

    He's calling the people with the cards in the newsagent windows unqualified amateurs, not people with MCSE's :-)

  211. Re:The reason computer techs are unqualified amate by Bourbonium · · Score: 1

    The demand never went away, Billly. You just have to market yourself and your sk1llz. As long as small businesses have Windows servers and Windows workstations, they're always going to need someone to take care of them. And those two certifications are gold (provided the customers understand what they mean and how hard you had to work to earn them).

    Most of my clients' biggest headaches involve the integrity of their backup systems, preventing viruses and cleaning up spyware. I can automate a lot of this stuff, so I only have to go into the clients' offices once or twice a month, but it is always good to keep an eye on things. If you set up remote management on your clients' systems, and you monitor what's going on, you can see a problem before they call you in a panic.

    There is plenty of business out there, but you need to network within user groups and small business organizations to build up a client base. Chambers of Commerce and local business associations (such as Rotary Clubs, Kiwanis clubs, etc.) are great opportunities for this. What often happens is one business will refer their partners to you, since they all face more or less the same IT problems. When a circle of small business owners get to know you by reputation, you will find you are in great demand and you may even have to turn down clients because there aren't enough hours in the day to service them all.

  212. Re:That was the whole reason I got out of consulti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hear ya brother... I think alot of us hear ya. Let them hire the little geniuses who think running neon tubes in their cases makes them a l337 dude or whatever. Seriously, I had one of those boneheads tell a client(back when I still did individual user contracts) that I was ripping them off, that he could do it cheaper. After several phone calls where the person was talking to me with heavily guarded anger, the person finally called back and said his nephew really didn't know what he was talking about.

    that's just one of many BS stories. Let the little home users and small businesses who won't sign contracts deal with the rice boys. They'll do it for 20 bucks an hour all cuz it makes them feel l337.

    One bit of advice going forward(though you're probably past this point), there are few businesses I will do business with on a handshake anymore, precisely because of the experience you described. Put a contract together and make them sign it. Also take retainers if they want a price quote up front for a big project. I had one customer take my spec for an application(I do DETAILED specs that even a ricer could follow), to someone else. There way of saving money I guess.

    No more of that. To quote from goodfellas "fuck you, pay me." This may not sound like a customer service attitude, but honestly, until they pay you, they aren't customers. And if you do work and they won't pay, they're thieves and don't deserve a customer service attitude. That's the way it is. I don't care if they talk like bleeding heart liberals or staunch conservatives spouting platitudes about principles. Don't trust anyone until you get a feel for them. Honestly, so far, doing business with former bikers are the only guys who handshakes I trust. Not a biker AT ALL here. Just so far in my experience, they know what their word is worth.