Slashdot Mirror


National Do Not Call List Opens for Registrations

prockcore writes "The National Do Not Call Registry is up and running. Sign up so most telemarketers cannot call you starting October 1st. There are exemptions though, like for charities and political organizations." Note that many of the states which have opened their own registries will be sharing that data with the national list, so you may not have to re-register - check and see what your state is doing.

599 comments

  1. Needs email address to register... by sdo1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm not particularly pleased that the US government now has a growing database tying email addresses to phone numbers.

    (for those that didn't bother to read it, they require a valid email address to register your phone number online)

    I guess I'll be creating a throw-away yahoo or hotmail address for this...

    -S

    --
    --- What parts of "shall make no law", "shall not be infringed", and "shall not be violated" don't you understand?
    1. Re:Needs email address to register... by slide-rule · · Score: 4, Insightful


      They are supposed to be releasing a phone number to call in after a week (or few). I plan to make use of that myself, as the CT do not call list has served me and my wife quite well. (We only get called once a year from a local sheriff's office asking for money.) The online version no doubt alleviates a flood of call volume from people who aren't so worried about the e-mail address thing, so more power to them.

    2. Re:Needs email address to register... by notque · · Score: 4, Funny

      they require a valid email address to register your phone number online

      They said valid, but they didn't say mine!

      bgates@microsoft.com

      --
      http://use.perl.org
    3. Re:Needs email address to register... by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

      I'm not particularly pleased that the US government now has a growing database tying email addresses to phone numbers.

      Have you heard of hotmail ?

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    4. Re:Needs email address to register... by Talking+Goat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And as such, that's the exact reason I won't be registering with it at all.
      Simply put, it's yet another database being compiled by the government, and to be for such a frivilous matter as telemarketers, I don't see the need.

      Do like I do: when I telemarketer calls, put them on hold... and forget about them. Or goof on them, al la Ed Norton in Boiler Room.

      --

      + G to tha Izzo, A to tha Tizee, Talking Giz-oat, Ya'll Bettah Feel Me... +
    5. Re:Needs email address to register... by rusty0101 · · Score: 1

      Sure set up an e-mail address in the hands of the ISP with one of the worst records for stopping Spam, in an effort to cut down on telemarketing calls.

      Anyone else see the irony here?

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
    6. Re:Needs email address to register... by dki · · Score: 5, Informative

      You can register by phone as well, without giving out an email address. Info on how to register by phone is here.

    7. Re:Needs email address to register... by squarefish · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think you're a little paranoid about the wrong things. What will the email do for them that the other info they obtain by your phone # doesn't? Chances are that by just supplying your phone # and prior to that they already know where you live, work, eat and sleep. Do you really think they haven't already tied your internet use to your phone/ip/address if they really wanted too?

      even though we generally don't have any privacy and our civil liberties are slowly being axed by the current administration- at least we can have sex any way we want now

      not for the super rightwingers: this is good for everyone.

      --
      Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.
    8. Re:Needs email address to register... by dave-tx · · Score: 1

      I'm shocked that any slashdot reader would find this objectionable, on the grounds that everyone saavy enough to be here SHOULD have a spam-sinkhole-hotmailish account that is never read, but used for just this sort of thing (as well as purchases from your favorite online bookstore).

      --

      >> "What would the robut do? Frame someone!"

    9. Re:Needs email address to register... by jhines0042 · · Score: 1

      They use an email address so that someone else cannot request to un-block your phone number.

      How useless would this be if any telemarketer could just log in, drop your phone numbers out of the DB, then call you.

      Besides, if the government wanted to get your phone number and email address together, I'm sure they could.

      --
      42 - So long and thanks for all the fish.
    10. Re:Needs email address to register... by sdo1 · · Score: 1
      Allow me to point you to the last line in my message... which wasn't particularly long.

      I guess I'll be creating a throw-away yahoo or hotmail address for this...

      So yes, as I'd already pointed out, I have "heard of hotmail".

      -S

      --
      --- What parts of "shall make no law", "shall not be infringed", and "shall not be violated" don't you understand?
    11. Re:Needs email address to register... by sc00p18 · · Score: 1

      Isn't there a valid email address that we're supposed to use in these situations? I remember reading about it once. Anybody else know?

    12. Re:Needs email address to register... by Talking+Goat · · Score: 0

      Ha ha ha, holy crap. I totally spaced that one.

      Totally offtopic, but that is very odd I confused the two. My bad yo, off the hizzey.

      --

      + G to tha Izzo, A to tha Tizee, Talking Giz-oat, Ya'll Bettah Feel Me... +
    13. Re:Needs email address to register... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      anything@example.com is fine, and garuneteed not to be in use (example.com, example.org, example.net etc. are all reserved for, well, use in examples).

    14. Re:Needs email address to register... by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1
      Well, don't be pleased then. You also don't have to give out an email address. Stop being paranoid.

      From CNN
      Telephone registration using a toll-free number -- 1-888-382-1222 -- is available in states west of the Mississippi River, including Minnesota and Louisiana. Nationwide registration should be available about 10 days later. Consumers must call from the home or cell phone they want to register.

      No email address needed. Geez, they just want to make sure folks know they were registerd. Now please go back to your hobbie of looking for the black helicoptors.

    15. Re:Needs email address to register... by BurKaZoiD · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't get called at all. I had my phone turned off. I swear to Gawd, I used to get at least five phone calls a night from solicitors. Now, I get none!

    16. Re:Needs email address to register... by Gorm+the+DBA · · Score: 4, Informative
      Except that what they are doing is sending a confirmation message to that e-mail address and requiring you to click on a link contained in the e-mail, so you need to be able to retreive the e-mail. Supposedly, unless you confirm within 72 hours, the registration is not valid.

      So, unless you call up Bill and have him forward it to you, that strategy wouldn't work anyhow.

      On the other hand, I'm still waiting for my confirmation e-mail, so I don't know for sure exactly how this is working, it all came from their instructions.

    17. Re:Needs email address to register... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I generally use poo@poo.poo but theres always eat@out.ass and kiss@my.ass

    18. Re:Needs email address to register... by fubar1971 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Here's a good idea. How about if the Fed takes your supplied email address and creates a "Do not SPAM list."

    19. Re:Needs email address to register... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's been brought up on Slashdot before, but I generally like to use "abuse@", "sales@", or "webmaster@" followed by the domain of the site you are viewing. For example, if you are trying to download the Real Player, I might use sales@real.com.

      Give them back some of their own spam. Even if it filters it out, it's worth a shot :)

    20. Re:Needs email address to register... by simetra · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, Chester, your tin-foil hat will protect you.

      Really, if the government wanted to get you, they could, EVEN WITHOUT knowing your phone number and email address.

      --

      "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    21. Re:Needs email address to register... by Placido · · Score: 1

      We haven't actually got his ip address yet... uh... wait. Forget I said anything.

      --

      Pinky: "What are we going to do tomorrow night Brain?"
      Brain: "I would tell you Pinky but this 120 char limi
    22. Re:Needs email address to register... by erpbridge · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you are in CT (as I am), the state says they'll be merging their registry into the federal one automatically. You don't need to re-register.

    23. Re:Needs email address to register... by saden1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      All my phoning is done through my cell phone. I see no benefit of having a lan line. No unsolicited calls. Of course if you go over you minutes the cell phone company will take you to the bank. I found out that the hard way but since then I've never gone over my minutes.

      --

      -----
      One is born into aristocracy, but mediocrity can only be achieved through hard work.
    24. Re:Needs email address to register... by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Funny
      They are supposed to be releasing a phone number to call in after a week (or few)

      And it'll probably require you to call in from that number, so Bob Effbeeaye will know exactly where you are at that moment!

      Our only hope is if they turn it over to private industry, like Comcast, which is apparently run by such a lot of bureaucrats that nobody knows where anyone is, what their status is and nothing gets done without a bunch of phone calls which eventually get you to some guy named Fred who works out of a broomcloset in Cincinatti and is the only one in the whole company who can actually get anything done (and he's not an employee, but a social engineer who got bored of highschool and decided to pretend he has a job.)

      If the FBI, CIA and other assorted snoops can't unravel something like Enron, you know it's because bureaucracies don't interface well.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    25. Re:Needs email address to register... by bief · · Score: 5, Informative

      "If you live in a state west of the Mississippi River (including Minnesota or Louisiana), you can call toll-free, 1-888-382-1222 (TTY 1-866-290-4236), from the number you wish to register." -- From the FTC's web site

    26. Re:Needs email address to register... by macaddict · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I think you're a little paranoid about the wrong things. What will the email do for them that the other info they obtain by your phone # doesn't?

      And didn't Microsoft just prove the reliability of using something as impermanent as domain/e-mail to identify someone? Phone numbers are just as reliable. Seven months after getting a new phone number, we still get calls for the previous user--at least a quarter of the telemarketing calls are directed at them.

      The government (from city up to federal) already knows things like a person's SSN and address. A home address is a bit more useful for aiming the mind control satellite than a Yahoo account! ;-)

    27. Re:Needs email address to register... by brakk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wouldn't it be easy to setup a script to register EVERY phone number by giving it an email of phone#@whatever.com, then auto reply to the incoming messages?

      Just leave out a few people you don't like (billg) so they will be getting flooded because they are the only ones left.

    28. Re:Needs email address to register... by tricky+Ric · · Score: 0

      Champ, if you RTFA you would know that the service does not take effect until activated by a link sent via the confirmation email.

    29. Re:Needs email address to register... by simetra · · Score: 1

      Actually, I believe the email they send contains a link which you much click to activate it. You could still automate it, but it would be a little harder than an auto-reply.

      --

      "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    30. Re:Needs email address to register... by BigBir3d · · Score: 1, Redundant
      For CT, if you are on the state list, you do not need to do anything (I had to check for myself already). You will be on the national list by default.

      Connecticut will adopt the National Do Not Call Registry in place of its existing state do not call list and share the numbers on its state list with the national registry. Connecticut consumers who already signed up for the state list do not need to re-register to have the protections of both federal and state law.
    31. Re:Needs email address to register... by tricky+Ric · · Score: 0

      STEP THREE: RECEIVE AN EMAIL You have submitted your phone number(s) for registration in the National Do Not Call Registry. You should receive X emails from Register@donotcall.gov within a few minutes. Open each email and click on the link provided to complete your registration. Important: If you do not click on the link in each email within 72 hours, your phone number will not be registered.

    32. Re:Needs email address to register... by Cloud+9 · · Score: 1
      he would have done a better job than Giovanni Ribisi, and isn't nealy as greasebally.

      Greasebally was kind of the point. It's hard to make Norton look like an 18 year old weaselly punk, with Giovanni Ribisi, it comes naturally.

      --
      Karma: Dyn-o-mite!(mostly affected by Jimmy Walker reading your comments)
    33. Re:Needs email address to register... by Anonymous+Cow+herd · · Score: 1

      Our only hope is if they turn it over to private industry

      Er... turning over our phone numbers to private industry is what got us into this freakin' mess in the first place!

      --
      Ita erat quando hic adveni.
    34. Re:Needs email address to register... by eah · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's working. My confirmation email took quite a while to arrive.

    35. Re:Needs email address to register... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe your email address goes into a national do not spam database ;~)

      Seriously, though, with a National Do Not Call list, does this mean all these telemarketing companies will be firing their staff and moving off shore? Seems like it could have a detremental affect on the economy in the short term and accomplish little in the long term. Anybody have more insight?

    36. Re:Needs email address to register... by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 0

      even though we generally don't have any privacy and our civil liberties are slowly being axed by the current administration

      Boy everyone likes to poke fun at the republicans.....well, they may not have had to do that if Clinton would have been taking care of Osama instead of playing with his cigars and Monica Lewinsky. Then again, if his daddy would have taken care of Saddam, we would not had to do it this time.

      --

      Gorkman

    37. Re:Needs email address to register... by derch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And what good will a db linking email to phone numbers be?

      The gov't already knows how much you make, where you live, your employment record, and who you're related to. They have easy access to your school records and most likely know how intelligent you are. They know what car you drive, what charities you give to, and your run-ins with the law. And if they've ever suspected you of anything, then they know your cohorts, political beliefs, your keystrokes, and what you say on the phone. If they were ever worried about who belongs to a particular address, they already had tools to easily find out.

      It's one more bit of information which is a little disturbing, but accounting for the breadth of knowledge they already have, an email address is insignificant. Especially when creating an anonymous, legal, throw-away address circumvents any linking.

      I'm not really directing this at you, it's directed to the idiot moderators who thought your comment deserved modding up.

    38. Re:Needs email address to register... by abischof · · Score: 1

      I've been thinking about cutting off my land line. But, I'm also considering signing up for DirecTV (or at least I'd like to leave that option open). Doesn't DirecTV require a land line for its initial setup or otherwise? Or, maybe that's not correct?

      Supposing that a land line is required for DirectTV, could I use a broadband-based phone service (like Vonage) for that? Then again, even if that did work, Vonage is still no cheaper than my land line (both are around $25).

      --

      Alex Bischoff
      HTML/CSS coder for hire

    39. Re:Needs email address to register... by slide-rule · · Score: 1

      which eventually get you to some guy named Fred

      Hey, BTW, do you have Fred's direct dial number? ;-)

    40. Re:Needs email address to register... by The_K4 · · Score: 1

      However most pizza places wnat a landline number (won't deliver to a cell number), FedEx and UPS require a landline number to do pickups (at least they did the last time i used that, it's been ~10 months so this might be different. Haveing a landline is a good thing, turning off the ringer is an even better thing. :)

    41. Re:Needs email address to register... by Andorion · · Score: 1

      There's a *big* difference between data that's minable, and data that's in a handy relational table.

      ~Berj

    42. Re:Needs email address to register... by milkman_matt · · Score: 1
      They are supposed to be releasing a phone number to call in after a week (or few).

      Already done! 888.382.1222.

      -matt

    43. Re:Needs email address to register... by derch · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Boy everyone likes to poke fun at the republicans.....well, they may not have had to do that if Clinton would have been taking care of Osama instead of playing with his cigars and Monica Lewinsky. Then again, if his daddy would have taken care of Saddam, we would not had to do it this time.

      Then again if the Clinton administration hadn't been hampered by impeachment hearings over blowjobs, maybe they would've dealt with Osama bin Laden. Then again if Reagan hadn't increased covert operations in Afghanistan, the Taliban may not have come to power. Then again if whoever hadn't supported the Shah, then Islamism (NOT Islam) may not have gained such a foothold. Then again if WWI and WWII hadn't happened, then the US wouldn't be such a world power and Sept 11 wouldn't have happened. Then again if the Ottoman empire had truly embraced Westernization, perhaps Europe and by extension the US would be Islamic. Etc, etc, etc... 20/20 hindsight and shoulda-woulda-coulda count for diddly squat.

      The truth still stands that the current administration has eroded our civil rights.

    44. Re:Needs email address to register... by rodney+dill · · Score: 5, Funny

      I fooled them I registered with a false name, false phone number, AND a false email address.

      Now if I could just get my phone to stop ringing.

      --

      Use your head, can't you, use your head,
      You're on earth, there's no cure for that
      - S. Beckett
    45. Re:Needs email address to register... by wo1verin3 · · Score: 1

      >> I'm not particularly pleased that the US
      >>government now has a growing database tying
      >>email addresses to phone numbers.

      I'm not particularly pleases we're creating a database of e-mail addresses that could be harvested for use outside of US jurisdiction.

    46. Re:Needs email address to register... by saskwach · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Don't bother calling, CT is in the list of states that will be transferring their current list to the national one. (Actually they're adopting the national one and adding what they have to it.)

    47. Re:Needs email address to register... by milkman_matt · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Of course if you go over you minutes the cell phone company will take you to the bank. I found out that the hard way but since then I've never gone over my minutes.

      Boy do I feel your pain.. I figured I didn't make that many calls so I canceled my land line and went cellular... 1 month later I owed them upwards of $300, but I hadn't gotten 1 solicitor since then!! ... I'm not sure if it was worth it. :)

      -matt

    48. Re:Needs email address to register... by milkman_matt · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Doesn't DirecTV require a land line for its initial setup or otherwise?

      DTV requires a phone for the INITIAL setup, but nothing after that.. maybe you can just get a long phone cable and plug it in at a neighbor's? IF You have the DTV TiVo, though, it wants to call out nightly, so you'll need a phone line. According to DTV, if TiVo doesn't call them once a month, they cancel your service entirely...

      -matt

    49. Re:Needs email address to register... by stieglmant · · Score: 1

      Better than creating a throw-away yahoo or hotmail address, go check out spamgourmet.com, and create a self-destructing disposable email address that will forward a limited (set by you) number of messages to your regular address. So far I have found that this works for everyone who needs a valid e-mail address, for any reason. Although I haven't tried it yet on this do not call list yet....the site is running reeeaaallllyyyy slooowwwww......

      --
      - The problem with the world is that everyone is a few drinks behind. -- Humphrey Bogart
    50. Re:Needs email address to register... by yasth · · Score: 1

      Packet8 has a low priced plan(5.95). Don't know if it would work fo rthat though. I remember for Vonage there was talk of a special command for TiVo taht would make it work (slowed down the speed I think).

      --
      I'd do something interesting, but my server can't handle a slashdotting.
    51. Re:Needs email address to register... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Er... turning over our phone numbers to private industry is what got us into this freakin' mess in the first place!


      Well, I can see W. can't count on a check from you.

    52. Re:Needs email address to register... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um, obviously you don't know anyone who has worked for MS. it's billg@microsoft.com, not that i'd expect he checks it himself...

    53. Re:Needs email address to register... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even during the thick of the scandal in 1998, Clinton was ordering missile attacks on terrorist training sites in Afghanistan. Bush, on the other hand, shelved Clinton's anti-terror programs for "policy review" as soon as he took office and didn't re-instate them until after 9/11. If cigars and interns help inspire presidents to work on *preventing* major attacks, instead of waiting until one happens before mobilizing against terrorists, I'm all for them.

    54. Re:Needs email address to register... by umrgregg · · Score: 1

      I wish there was a mod point for idiocy.

      --
      NMG
    55. Re:Needs email address to register... by Crockerboy · · Score: 1

      DirectTV also dials out to tell DirectTV what Pay Per View channels you watched...I believe the service agreement requires you to keep a phone line attached to the unit even after initial setup.

    56. Re:Needs email address to register... by milkman_matt · · Score: 1
      DirectTV also dials out to tell DirectTV what Pay Per View channels you watched...

      What the installer told us was DTV dials out to ORDER Pay Per View stuff, never said anything about telling them what you've ordered, doesn't mean it doesn't do that too, though. In any case, my roomie doesn't order PPV stuff and has had his system unplugged since it's been set up, the installer just told him to plug it in if he's going to order PPV. Not sure what it says in the contract. I leave mine plugged in anyways since I have TiVo, they don't give me a choice :(

      -matt

    57. Re:Needs email address to register... by jridley · · Score: 1

      Dish Network has a phone line hookup, but ours has never been plugged in. You only need to hook it up if you're going to order PPV stuff. Dish doesn't even require it for initial hookup.

    58. Re:Needs email address to register... by ohboy-sleep · · Score: 1

      Tell them "I'm sorry, I'd love to take your call, but I don't have a phone."

    59. Re:Needs email address to register... by schlyne · · Score: 1

      I've never had that problem with a pizza place. I've been using a cell phone exclusively for over 6 months now. I've never had a problem.

      I have gotten one solicated phone call though. Apparently the university were calling students and alumni wanting more money (excuse me, donations). Bah.

      --
      I love deadlines. I like the "whoosh" sound they make as they fly by. -- Douglas Adams
    60. Re:Needs email address to register... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a microsoft employee told me..bill's regular email is billg@microsoft.com

    61. Re:Needs email address to register... by sig+cop · · Score: 0

      I like excel@your.job and exclamation.point@pound.sign r@.atat.tat and i.s@.in.some.poo.how.about.you?

    62. Re:Needs email address to register... by km790816 · · Score: 1

      Visit one site:

      sneakemail.com


      Completely valid email addresses. Totally anonymous.

    63. Re:Needs email address to register... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The truth still stands that the PREVIOUS administration has eroded our civil rights.

      and the one before that, and before that, etc.

      democrats erode civil rights too, and regardless of what they say, they do not care about you.

      and no i did not imply the republicans do either, they both do a poor job.

    64. Re:Needs email address to register... by Aadain2001 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You'd be scared shitless if you truely knew just how much information the government has/can get on you. Tieing your phone number(s) to an email address is nothing.

      Here is a great example: we have NO idea what the NSA does because there are no checks or balances in place for them. Through some nifty loopholes, the group was founded with almost complete autonomy and no oversight. The only real tie they have is through funding, and even that is classified! Some estimates by people in the know say that half of the world's computing power is actually in the direct control of the NSA. They have the ability to record and analize EVERY phone conversation in the world in real time and are rumored to be able to break PGP (hence why they stopped blocking it from being legally exported).

      Now, after knowing the power that they have, do you really think that you linking an email address to a phone number is really something to worry about?

      P.S. I am not a lunitic (I just play on on /.), I got this from many reputable news sources. I'd post exactly which ones, but I don't have the list handy. Email me if you really want the list.

      --
      Space for rent, inquire within
    65. Re:Needs email address to register... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, you guys seem to have slashdotted donotcall.gov anyways, so you can't give them that email address!

    66. Re:Needs email address to register... by derch · · Score: 1

      Did I say the Dems smell like roses? No, I never said Democrats were holy and perfect. It wasn't the point of my post. The point is that it's a valid criticism to make of the current administration - being Republican or Democrat has nothing to do with it.

    67. Re:Needs email address to register... by chef_raekwon · · Score: 1

      here's the solution:

      1 - get Direct TV
      2 - cancel phone.

      problem solved.

      --
      We're like rats, in some experiment! -- George Costanza
    68. Re:Needs email address to register... by stealthv · · Score: 1

      Actually, I believe what happens is when you order something you are given access to it right away. The reciever then stores what you have ordered on the card and makes a call at some later time to tell DirecTV what to bill you for.
      So you could order things without the phone line but I think the card has a limit of how many items you can order without it calling out.

    69. Re:Needs email address to register... by milovoo · · Score: 1

      I have direcTV and I have never had a phone line (cell phone for everything).
      I don't claim to understand how that is possible, but it does seem to work OK.

      -milo

    70. Re:Needs email address to register... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. I'm pretty sure you're the first person out of the ten or so I know with DirecTV who is actually PAYING for it.

    71. Re:Needs email address to register... by mjh · · Score: 2, Informative

      Man, I love TMDA. I'll just generate an expiring address. The one that I'm giving them will only work for 7 days.

      --
      Key to financial independence: Spend less than you earn. Save and invest the difference. Do it for a long time.
    72. Re:Needs email address to register... by michrech · · Score: 1

      Get Dish Network instead. It has more channels capable of Dolby Digital than DTV does, has more HDTV channels (if your into that), and just has a larger selection of channels (not that it means they have anything more interesting on). The receivers do *not* require a phone line for *anything* what-so-ever. If you want PPV, you can just use your cell phone and dial the 800 number or use their web page.

      The *only* thing Dish is missing is that stupid-assed Sunday Ticket (or whatever it's called).. Has something to do with sports so I ignore it all-together.

      Oh well.. I'm rambling now.. The above is just my two cents.. =]

      --
      bork bork bork!
    73. Re:Needs email address to register... by neitzsche · · Score: 2, Informative

      I use spamgourmet. http://www.spamgourmet.com

      --
      "God is dead." - Frederik Nietzsche
    74. Re:Needs email address to register... by pla · · Score: 1

      I guess I'll be creating a throw-away yahoo or hotmail address for this.

      No good. Yahoo currently blocks the confirmation email (see http://tinyurl.com/fg3f) from the FTC as spam (how ironic... or deliberate?).

      Just wait a week (assuming you don't live on the "favored" half of the continent, west of the Mississippi) and use their direct call-in registration. No compromise in privacy there, since they need to know your phone number to block it anyway.

    75. Re:Needs email address to register... by Misch · · Score: 1

      You could live on the outskirts of a small city and get nearly no reception on a cell phone. That would be enough to convince you to get a land line.

      *ring* *ring*
      Me: "Hey mom!"
      Mom: "Hello?"
      Me: "Hi!"
      Mom: "Hello?"
      Me: "Can you hear me?"
      Mom: *click*

      --

      --You will rephrase your request for me to go to hell. Goto statements are not acceptable programming constructs
    76. Re:Needs email address to register... by abischof · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Dish does sound enticing, for all the reasons you mentioned (especially the HDTV channels). However, I give DirecTV the edge for its integrated TiVo service -- I already have a regular TiVo and I just couldn't live without it :).

      --

      Alex Bischoff
      HTML/CSS coder for hire

    77. Re:Needs email address to register... by abischof · · Score: 1

      I know that regular TiVos support USB WiFi adapters (and I have my TiVo setup that way at the moment). But, do DirecTiVos have that functionality, or do you know if there're any plans to add that in?

      --

      Alex Bischoff
      HTML/CSS coder for hire

    78. Re:Needs email address to register... by geekee · · Score: 1

      "I'm not particularly pleased that the US government now has a growing database tying email addresses to phone numbers."

      Yes, also I heard there was this large book that is circulated in every community that links a persons NAME to a PHYSICAL ADDRESS and a PHONE NUMBER. Not only the govt., but the police and ordinary citizens have access to this info. The seem to call the thing a phone book.

      --
      Vote for Pedro
    79. Re:Needs email address to register... by jordandeamattson · · Score: 1

      While I can see this requirement as providing fodder for many dark conspiracy theories, I don't see it as a big burden. As someone said, get the throwaway email to register for the list.

      I am sure that this was one of the compromises required to get the DMA (Direct Marketing Association) to not put up a fit. They probably didn't want some person going in a start at A in the phone book and entering everyone into the list (would have been fun to automate) and then have everyone in the country off-limits.

      So, we have to provide some "proof" that we are who we say we are, and we can register. It is cheap, it is easy, and it is not unduly burdensome. I send kudos to the person at the FCC who thought of this as a way to do it.

    80. Re:Needs email address to register... by TalMaximus · · Score: 1

      Not that the government couldn't get any info they wanted on us right now as it is.

    81. Re:Needs email address to register... by The_K4 · · Score: 1

      I have run into the problem as recently as last winter. They asked for a phone number, i gave them my cell and they said since that was a cell and they therefor couldn't verify the address that deleviry was unavaliable. I guess that some areas are more "tech friendly" then others. Good to know that there is progress being made.

    82. Re:Needs email address to register... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no you wont...yahoo is blocking the response messages

      CBS Marketwatch has the story

      http://cbs.marketwatch.com/

    83. Re:Needs email address to register... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      read this as yahoo is blocking the confirmation emails:

      http://cbs.marketwatch.com/news/story.asp?guid=% 7B EA0D3D28%2D499C%2D433E%2DAC18%2D24EC8BD8B929%7D&si teid=mktw

    84. Re:Needs email address to register... by stanmann · · Score: 1

      try switching from sprint to Tmobile or AT&T, I have found 3 places(ever) that I couldn't get reception with AT&T, and only one of them was open air, and that was on 10 between San Antonio and Houston.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    85. Re:Needs email address to register... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I'm terribly sorry. I didn't mean to slip that peyote into your tea. I don't care what amount of computing power they have, but there is absofuckinglutely no way hell or on god's green earth that they can record and analyze every phone conversation in the world in real time.

    86. Re:Needs email address to register... by k4w0ru · · Score: 1

      It's not really 100% gauranteed; I only use a cell phone for my phone needs, but I have recieved a few unsolcited calls before. Not too many, but I still got some.

    87. Re:Needs email address to register... by a9db0 · · Score: 1

      ...I'm an over forty victim of fate...

      Glad to know I'm not the only parrothead around here.

      --
      -- "Never underestimate the power of human stupidity." - R.A.H.
    88. Re:Needs email address to register... by Lux · · Score: 1

      So if we need to be able to check the mail box then I guess we'll have to settle for bgates@hotmail.com.

      Or is passport bug-free now? :)

    89. Re:Needs email address to register... by sirsex · · Score: 1

      Dish Network has a DVR that you can get for $200. And it uses Dish's menu guide, so you doen't pay extra to Tivo.

    90. Re:Needs email address to register... by MntlChaos · · Score: 1

      not today (go through step 2 in registration process... "We're sorry. The site is unavailable at the moment. Please try again later.") confirmed mega /. effect in progress 8 hours later.

    91. Re:Needs email address to register... by cscx · · Score: 1

      That won't help since most SPAM comes from Asia and other places around the world.

    92. Re:Needs email address to register... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder how telemarketers deal with people who use TTY phones.

    93. Re:Needs email address to register... by unger · · Score: 1

      nope, from the website:

      Q: I have more than three personal telephone numbers. How can I register all of those numbers?

      A: You may register up to three telephone numbers at one time on the National Do Not Call Registry Web site. If you have more than three personal telephone numbers, you will have to go through the registration process more than once to register all of your numbers. There is a limit on the number of phone numbers you can register in this manner.

      You can only register one phone number each time you call the National Do Not Call Registry at 1-888-382-1222; for TTY, call 1-866-290-4236. You must call from the phone number you wish to register.

    94. Re:Needs email address to register... by scottott · · Score: 1
  2. already slashdotted by mt2mb4me · · Score: 2, Funny

    already slashdooted and no posts, i love the gov'

    1. Re:already slashdotted by ldspartan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It was down before the "there will be a story here" tag went up on /., so there's no blaming this site for it.

    2. Re:already slashdotted by notque · · Score: 1, Funny

      It was down before the "there will be a story here" tag went up on /.

      So what you're saying is, we slashdotted the site from just moderators checking to see if it would be a decent story to use?

      Soon the entire internet will fall by the mere concept of Slashdot linking it.

      --
      http://use.perl.org
    3. Re:already slashdotted by chundo · · Score: 1

      Slashot is on donotcall.gov's "Do Not Call" list...

      -j

    4. Re:already slashdotted by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      heh, it's their first day and every news outlet is carrying the story. This wasn't slashdotted, it CNN-Fox-MSNBC-dotted long before the story went up on /.

      Seriously, they had to know they were going to get major traffic. I saw it on CNN as I was eating my cornflakes. I heard it on the radio as I was driving in. I had email from 4 people telling me about it when I walked in. 2 others have mentioned it in conversations. Everyone seems to know about it.

      There must be pandemonium somewhere as they scramble to get back online.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    5. Re:already slashdotted by ldspartan · · Score: 1

      Heh, more like the load from other places killed it before /. had a chance :)

    6. Re:already slashdotted by Brett+Johnson · · Score: 1

      I saw it on CNN before I saw it on /.

    7. Re:already slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Curse you Slashdot! You killed the Do Not Call List!

    8. Re:already slashdotted by mink · · Score: 1

      It was on the front page of the WSJ (in really small letters).

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
    9. Re:already slashdotted by ant1832 · · Score: 1

      Yes you are correct. I saw this earlier on CNN before it got posted here. I was already having a heck of a time getting the page to come up. I suppose the post on /. didn't help the situation though. I wonder how long it will take for me to ge the e-mail?

    10. Re:already slashdotted by darien · · Score: 1

      The headquarters of the Order of the Phoenix may be found at number 12 Grimwald Place, London.

      O/T, I know but... did they change this for the American market? In my (British) copy it's spelt Grimmauld.

    11. Re:already slashdotted by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      oops, no

      I spelled it wrong!

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

  3. Fastest Slashdotting ever? by frieked · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow, slashdotted before the article was even posted to non-subscribers...
    I think this is a new record: Slashdotted in negative 37 seconds

    But seriously, I like screwing with telemarketers heads too much to put my number on this list anyway.

    --

    I have often regretted my speech, never my silence.
    -Xenocrates
    1. Re:Fastest Slashdotting ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, how is this gov site implemented? Anyone know? J2EE, .Net, PHP? Whose server hardware did they use?

    2. Re:Fastest Slashdotting ever? by drdink · · Score: 1

      Looks like ASP.Net

      --
      Beware, Nugget is watching... See?
    3. Re:Fastest Slashdotting ever? by Fishstick · · Score: 2, Interesting
      No, it was slow right after CNN gave out the URL this morning @ 8:30.

      Somehow I think that had a little more to do with it (being broadcast to millions nationwide) than being posted on /.

      I noticed that the pages are .aspx -- kind of surprised me a little.

      according to netcraft:
      OS, Web Server and Hosting History for donotcall.gov

      unknown Microsoft-IIS/5.0 27-Jun-2003 206.16.196.198 CERFnet
      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    4. Re:Fastest Slashdotting ever? by the+uNF+cola · · Score: 1

      'cause it was fark'd first. www.fark.com had it before slashdot did.

      --

      --
      "I'm not bright. Big words confuse me. But Wanda loves me and that should be enough for you." - Cosmo

    5. Re:Fastest Slashdotting ever? by Verteiron · · Score: 1

      Oh, and here I was wondering why it was down just a few hours after its launch. Guess that explains it...

      --
      End of lesson. You may press the button.
    6. Re:Fastest Slashdotting ever? by SanLouBlues · · Score: 2, Funny

      They just didn't anticipate the load. Who would have thought it would be such a popular website?

      OR

      It's a scheme. If the site is always down, the telemarketers can't possibly check it to know who not to call! That's why they hosted it on a 386 with the a Paradox database.

    7. Re:Fastest Slashdotting ever? by BamaSlam · · Score: 1

      Hosted on IIS? With it's current security track record, I wouldn't feel safe giving it my email address or my home phone number.

    8. Re:Fastest Slashdotting ever? by opti6600 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Here's my best one yet...

      "Hello sir, may I please speak to whoever is in charge of the major decisions for this household?"

      "SATAN MAKES THE MAJOR DECISIONS IN MY HOUSEHOLD!"

      "Uhh...have a nice day!" *click*

      or then there's the classic "turnaround"

      "Good afternoon sir, I'm calling from..."

      "Hi there, would you like to contribute to the Pinecrest Police annual funding drive? We'll even throw in a sticker showing your generous contribution if you act now! You can donate as little as $20, it's that simple!"

      "Er..." - this is where they try to figure out why they, the telemarketer, have just been given a sales pitch

      "If you're not sure about $20, we could lower the minimum contribution just for you to $15, and we'll even throw in a license plate badge!"

      "No thanks" *click* - now they know how you feel

      Ahh, screwing with telemarketers...

      Best regards,
      Jordan

    9. Re:Fastest Slashdotting ever? by artemis67 · · Score: 1

      It was Slashdotted long before Slashdot posted the story. I heard about the site from at least 3 different news sources this morning before I got to work.

      They are expecting 60 million people to register. Apparently, all 60 million are trying to register at the same time.

    10. Re:Fastest Slashdotting ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the site was hit by something bigger than a Slashdotting. If one were to make the analogy to weather patterns, a Slashdotting is something like a class 4 or class 5 hurricane. Whatever this is should be analogized to the storm that occurs once in a millenium, and only when the planets are property aligned.

    11. Re:Fastest Slashdotting ever? by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      I see now that it is back up and they have switched to a text-only version.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    12. Re:Fastest Slashdotting ever? by maiden_taiwan · · Score: 1

      How appropriate: they hosted the "do not call" list using a "do not hit" web site.

    13. Re:Fastest Slashdotting ever? by globalar · · Score: 1

      Considering that there are millions of consumers who are going sign up for this on their lunch break and throughout the day, /. may just be a drop in the bucket.

    14. Re:Fastest Slashdotting ever? by ninti · · Score: 1
      'cause it was fark'd first. www.fark.com had it before slashdot did.

      Actually, based on the comment timestamps, Slahsdot appears to have beaten Fark by about half an hour. But I think we can safely say that both helped.

      Fark and Slashdot are both dangerous enough on their own, together they are a tag team match of server death and destruction.

    15. Re:Fastest Slashdotting ever? by Wilk4 · · Score: 1
    16. Re:Fastest Slashdotting ever? by ndogg · · Score: 1

      Quick, someone post a mirror or the text of the article here!

      Err, oh, nevermind...

      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    17. Re:Fastest Slashdotting ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The headquarters of the Order of the Phoenix may be found at number 12 Grimwald Place, London.



      Thanks!

      -Voldemort

    18. Re:Fastest Slashdotting ever? by athakur999 · · Score: 1

      it's also being CNNed, local news'ed, Reutered (that doesn't sound pleasant), AP'ed, etc.

      We're not talking the latest "turn a coffee can into a model of the Death Star" article, a national do not call list is something nearly everyone is interested in.

      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
    19. Re:Fastest Slashdotting ever? by johnbeat · · Score: 1

      A junk call from the California Narcotics Officers Association (or something like that). We made small talk first, you know, "how are you doing," "Fine, how are you?", "Fine, thanks for asking." Then he got down to asking me for money (I assume, as we didn't get that far.) He told me how we're winning the war on drugs, and the most important thing in winning the war on drugs is stopping "the dope" from coming in over the border (I live in San Diego), and also putting the dealers in jail.

      That's the exact phrase he used. "The dope." I thought I was receiving a telephone call straight out of the fifties.

      "You support that, don't you?" he asked.

      I responded, "No, I support 'the dope' wholeheartedly."

      "Oh, well, we're mainly concerned with the cocaine and heroin."

      "Well, I support those, too."

      "Okay, sir, well, you have a nice day."

      "You have a nice day, too. Thanks for calling."

      (No one's broken my door down yet.)

      Jerry

  4. If you find the site slow ... by jmays · · Score: 3, Informative

    The site has been heavy hit all day ... even before the coming slashdotting!

    --
    KARMA TAG! You're it.
    1. Re:If you find the site slow ... by Torqued · · Score: 1

      I'm glad I signed up earlier this morning! :)

    2. Re:If you find the site slow ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't help that this site is run by .NET server (.aspx files)

    3. Re:If you find the site slow ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      slashdotters should stop crowing about how they
      'brought down an asp site'. This service was featured
      on all the major news morning programs, seen by
      millions of viewers, and has been linked off the
      major news outlet pages.

    4. Re:If you find the site slow ... by vistas · · Score: 1

      oh? and do you have stats that show that aspx with C# would be any worse than any other solution under these conditions?

      do you know precisely that that is the problem, instead of maybe a hardware problem.

      do you just assume they wrote the database access for SQL Server instead of Oracle or MySQL (last I heard, .NET data providers are available for both).

      Why not just assume that maybe they just had a misinformed architect?

  5. Yes... by mgcsinc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All I can say is Thank God! More than a simple annoyance in our home lives, the telemarketing industry is a severe drain on the resources of this country. Much like the bureaucracies of Europe (not to mention Canada) which are so widely criticized, the US telemarking industry provides a means of artificial employment for innumerable workers in this country, with people attempting to sell unwanted products in vain, going from job to job as telemarketing franchises are born and die, contributing nothing to the actual economic output of the country. Goodbye telemarketing, and good riddance...

    1. Re:Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Its an annoyance, most people would agree, but a drain on resources? No.

      If people decide to invest in these telemarketing companies, thats their perrogative. If people bought nothing from them they would fail on their own.

      The problem is the few people who DO buy their crap. Those workers still got paid and kept the economy moving, even if what they were doing isn't popular.

      I dont need the no-call, because i generally screen my calls on an answering machine(home) and look at the number before answering(cell).

    2. Re:Yes... by nhaze · · Score: 1
      ...contributing nothing to the actual economic output of the country
      While I despise the practices of telemarketing it would be hard to say they don't contribute anything to the economoy. Last figure i saw in 2002, telemarketing was a $600+ billion dollar industry.
    3. Re:Yes... by gregoryb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > with people attempting to sell unwanted products in vain

      I'm not sure it's all in vain. Somebody has to buy the crap, otherwise you'd think it wouldn't be so widespread and companies would quit using it as a method of advertising.

      Unfortunately, I'm sad to say that my age 80+ grandparents have bought way too much of the junk sold by telemarketers, and I'm sure there are others like them out there.

    4. Re:Yes... by dave-tx · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm hoping this will work better than the do-not-call list in Texas. Maybe other Texans have had better luck, but I'm still swamped with calls that fall under the "legal" umbrella (such as shady real estate dealings that somehow claim they fall under the non-profit clause). Hey, at least the national list doesn't make you fork out a couple bucks to sign up, unlike the Texas list.

      --

      >> "What would the robut do? Frame someone!"

    5. Re:Yes... by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 1
      I would agree with you, except that companies woudln't employ telemarketers if it wasn't economically viable. In other words, they do contribute to the economy of this country, by selling us products we wouldn't other wise get, which keeps the flow of money going, which is essential in a capatalist economy.

      Also, I woudln't mind having a bureaucracy like Europe and Canada if I got the services that they get. Free Healthcare, for starters. Instead, all we have is more guns than anyone else. Go USA!

    6. Re:Yes... by NudeZiggy · · Score: 1

      hmm, interesting, I've been on the list since they started it and haven't gotten a single call, except for some automated dealy that keeps telling me to hold for an important non-solicitation message and then tells me to call some other number....every other day. anyone have any idea what that one's about?

    7. Re:Yes... by fname · · Score: 1

      Don't take this the wrong way, but if you believe that $600 billion number, you're a dope. Basically, if 1 division of MS uses telemarketing, they include ALL of MS' revenue as part of the "Telemarketing industry." At $50K/ employee, for that number to be true, they would have to have12 million employees!

      Sometimes you have to be a bit skeptical and exercise your math skills. Don't believe everything you read.

    8. Re:Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but have you tried calling the number it gives out and telling them to fuck off and stop calling ?

    9. Re:Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they do have 12 million employees. That's about how many telemarketing calls I get in a week.

    10. Re:Yes... by nhaze · · Score: 1
      ... Basically, if 1 division of MS uses telemarketing, they include ALL of MS' revenue as part of the "Telemarketing industry."
      It sounds like you are refering to a specific study/reference. I don't know where you grabbed your 50k figure, but across the industry the amount of revenue generated by a single employee is going to be much higher than that, considering operational overhead that must be accounted for. Maybe that is a reasonable figure for the creeps that try to sell cheap trinkets and what not. A significant portion of the industry also targets big businesses, which can include _very_ large products. Granted I have not scoured over each telemarketing company's ledger,I do not think the figure is so unreasonable. While you may have exercised your math skills, try to get the proper figures to compute from... Perhaps you can file a complaint with the FTC that you have uncovered some industry-wide fraud.
    11. Re:Yes... by fname · · Score: 1

      Put another way, at $600 billion, that works out to about $3000 for every adult in the country. Our GNP is about $10 trillion, so if the telemarketing number is correct, telemarketers account for 6% of our GNP.

      Honestly, I made up the $50K number; the industry itslef claims employment of about 6 million people. Do you believe that 5% of our workers are telemarketers? Do you have any.

      Essentially, this number so obviousy fails the smell test that it's pathetic. It's sad that the media breathlessly report this number without considering its meaning for even a minute. Go find the industry study that details where the $600 billion number came from and read it, because the news outlets that you rely on obviously didn't.

      They also claim 180 million sales transactions, which is probably correct. That means the average transaction is more than $3000! Do you know anyone who bought $3000 worth of stuff from a telemarketer?

      Story

      I doubt telemarketing is responsible for anywhere close to 6% of our total economic output. Believe what you will, but I don't buy the industry BS.

    12. Re:Yes... by nhaze · · Score: 1
      Okay, you are correct in thinking that the $600b does not jive with GNP. That's because the $600b reflects the industry revenue. The $600b amount includes the entire sale price of the products/services they are selling, not just their profit off the sale.
      In the end, I would suspect a majority of the revenue is piped back to their clients who hired them in the first place. That's still a pretty effective sales channel if your product is marketable to dolts.
      They also claim 180 million sales transactions, which is probably correct. That means the average transaction is more than $3000! Do you know anyone who bought $3000 worth of stuff from a telemarketer?
      Assuming those figures are correct, It is likely not a unimodal distribution of sales. Like I said above, you have the lower-tier t'marketers with the affordable price-point, mid-tier, and then the corporate sales that often carry a pretty hefty pricetag. Taking the average of a (at least) trimodal distribution and attributing it to a single target population is of course going to sound ridiculous.
      I hope this clears things up...
    13. Re:Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      the US telemarking industry provides a means of artificial employment for innumerable workers in this country, with people attempting to sell unwanted products in vain, going from job to job as telemarketing franchises are born and die, contributing nothing to the actual economic output of the country
      Uh, maybe you ought to think before posting. If telemarketing didn't make money, why do you receive so many calls? If you say telemarketing doesn't contribute to the "actual economic output of the country", you're dead wrong and ignorant. Service industries do contribute to GDP, and whether you understand it or not, they're a contributing part of the economy. Just because they don't make physical goods doesn't mean they're useless.
    14. Re:Yes... by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      heh, free healthcare? You really think it's free? :p

      Not to mention, it's not the GOVERNMENT buying guns (well, they DO buy guns, but I don't hink you're commenting on the military)

    15. Re:Yes... by switcha · · Score: 1
      the telemarketing industry is a severe drain on the resources of this country

      This has been more my beef with the whole industry, even more than just the annoyance to myself. I am thrilled with the do not call list, as my own personal campaign wasn't bringing the industry to it's knees.

      I had a friend tell me that if enough people said "Sure, he's home let me get him for you!" and then set down the phone until the person gave up and hung up, it would destroy profit margins for telemarketers. They have to get so many calls in per hour to turn a profit, and by wasting their time like that you could destroy that ability. I have been doing that for 2 years, and it hasn't seemed to make much of an impact. ;)

      --
      You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
    16. Re:Yes... by Penguin2212 · · Score: 1

      I'd have to also disagree, advertising and marketing techniques are around as long as they are selling. Can you recall the last time you saw the Taco Bell dog on TV? He was only on as long as people were buying tacos, then they moved on. Now, do you remember the last time you saw an ad for IBM Business solutions? Probablly, within the last few days. Advertizing techniques are only around as long as they sell.

      However, I do agree that telemarketers have a shitty job, usually they're high-pressure positions with high quotas and a high turnover rates.

    17. Re:Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A $600 billion industry is not the same as $600b in sales.

      It just means that because of this job, $600b changes hands, weather it is product, personel, office space, electricity, equiptment, etc. It doesnt even matter if its profit or loss.

      Think of it this way, the switchboard for a call center is highly specialized. The cost of the engineer that makes the transitors in the power supply of the switchboard is part of this figure.

    18. Re:Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I hope this clears things up..."
      It didnt.
      The numbers dont seem to jive for me as well.

    19. Re:Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On FoxNews a few minutes ago, a spokesman for the telemarketers said that it would cost about 2 million jobs in the U.S.

      Well, whoop-d-shit! It couldn't happen to a bunch of nicer people. Now they can go on to bigger and better jobs, like WalMart greeters.

    20. Re:Yes... by defaultXIX · · Score: 1

      I am a telemarketer you insensitive clod, but really, the way we get around that is calling you from another state. If you live in massachusetts right now, I probably called you today. Would you like the buy the boston globe?

      I hate my job though. but the numbers are interesting. we started with 200,000 phone nmumbers. We got through to 60,000 people. We sold less than 300 subscriptions.

      a subscription costs 50 dollars so they made 15,000 dollars. We had 15 people calling 40 hours a week for 2 weeks. at 7 dollars and hour.
      thats 4200 dollars. that doesnt count management, but wow we bugged the shit outta MA, all for less then 10,000 dollars. great. instead of calling about the globe, maybe I'll see if anyone is hiring....

  6. Call me daft if you wish... by jaiteend · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But, signing up now seems a bit absurd. It would be like giving the telemarketters three months time to use my number until then. I think that I might just wait until, oh say, October 1st.

    --
    and the Irishman took the fly in his hands and yelled, "spit it out!"
    1. Re:Call me daft if you wish... by samael · · Score: 2, Informative

      They have three months to put all new entries into their systems. No matter when you sign up there's a three month window until it takes effect...

    2. Re:Call me daft if you wish... by frieked · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why don't you read the site before saying anything:
      All consumers whose numbers are on the registry by August 31, 2003 will notice a downturn in telemarketing calls starting October 1, 2003. Consumers who register after September 1, 2003 will notice a drop in telemarketing calls within three months of the date they register.

      --

      I have often regretted my speech, never my silence.
      -Xenocrates
    3. Re:Call me daft if you wish... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you read the page at all? If you wait until October 1st, Telemarketers have 3 months to call you before they are prohobited. Instead, to minimize your time on the list while you're still callable, sign up August 26th/27th, and then you'll still be uncallable Oct. 1st.

    4. Re:Call me daft if you wish... by mbourgon · · Score: 1

      This should be 5: funny, not Insightful. If you register now, do they pass the number around to telemarketers? I somehow doubt it.

      Although, with the slashdotting right now, it might BE October 1st before I get to register.

      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    5. Re:Call me daft if you wish... by garcia · · Score: 1

      it doesn't matter, it will take three months after you sign up for it to go into effect.

      The State of MN's DNC list has saved me quite a few calls. I still get a couple recordings on my answering machine though without phone #s to call back and yell at.

      I am hoping that using this will stop ALL attempts at using my answering machine as a billboard.

      I prefer when it says 0.

    6. Re:Call me daft if you wish... by phantomlord · · Score: 1
      From the FTC FAQ:

      "The law requires telemarketers to search the registry every three months and synchronize their call lists with the phone numbers that are on the registry."

      If you want to be on the list for October 1st, you need to register by August 31. If you register on October 1st, you won't be on all the telemarketers DNC list until February 1st

      --
      Don't leave your mind so open that your brain falls out. Don't close it so much that you cut off the blood.
    7. Re:Call me daft if you wish... by _mythdraug_ · · Score: 1

      Daft boy... If you wait until then to sign up, it will be three more months before they are required to not call you. If, however, you sign up Aug 30. You will be on the list for October enforcement.

    8. Re:Call me daft if you wish... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you obviously didn't read the article nor did the people who mod'd you up to +5

    9. Re:Call me daft if you wish... by Oloryn · · Score: 1
      But, signing up now seems a bit absurd. It would be like giving the telemarketters three months time to use my number until then. I think that I might just wait until, oh say, October 1st.

      Given that it's 3 months from when you sign up until your number goes on the list no matter when you sign up, how exactly is waiting until Oct 1st going to gain you anything?

    10. Re:Call me daft if you wish... by Q2Serpent · · Score: 1, Funny

      My answering machine always says '0' too, but I wish it didn't. Of course, here I am, replying to a slashdot post, so I don't think that's going to change in the near future.

    11. Re:Call me daft if you wish... by Gopher · · Score: 1

      Telemarketers still have 3 months from the time you sign up to remove your number from their lists, so your wait may be futile...

    12. Re:Call me daft if you wish... by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that they do not recieve the list of blocked numbers, but that they must check their numbers against the list.

      Now the method of doing this has not been publisised to my knowlege. But I am guessing that they do not need to download the list, only check numbers against it in some manner.

      Of course they could check every number, and use the hits. but without a name associated, the usefullness of that list is marginal to them.

    13. Re:Call me daft if you wish... by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      Why do I see a flood of Tele-Marketers in business for 2 months and 30 days?

      1. Start Business
      2. continuing annoying calls for 2 months 30 days
      3. Close down company selling list to 'new' company coincidentally with same owner.
      4. Repeat

      How does this list prevent this from happening? All of the do not call, do not spam ideas involve prosecuting offenders, but not tracking down the people who aren't going to obey the rules anyway. THAT's what we really need. I know there are marginally better laws in place to stop phone bandits but it's a royal pain tracking them down.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    14. Re:Call me daft if you wish... by sehryan · · Score: 1

      No, they mean it will tkae three months for your number to get distributed once you sign up, not than a new business doesn't have to worry about it for three months. If you sign up now, and a new company starts up five months later, your number will not be added to their call lists.

      --
      The world moves for love. It kneels before it in awe.
    15. Re:Call me daft if you wish... by John+Harrison · · Score: 1
      Why do I see a flood of Tele-Marketers in business for 2 months and 30 days?

      Perhaps you see this flood because you didn't understand the post you responded to. Nobody said that telemarketers don't have to use the list for 3 months. What was said was that it takes three months to get your name on the list once you enter it into the system. The two things are not the same at all.

    16. Re:Call me daft if you wish... by sevensharpnine · · Score: 1

      Quick, does anyone know how many months it takes for my entry in the do-not-call list to go in effect? Two months? Four?

      --
      "God is a comedian playing to an audience too afraid to laugh." -Voltaire
    17. Re:Call me daft if you wish... by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. I just don't see anything that requires a 'new' business to start their list with this do not call list. It says they need to check every three months. So if the check is forced on business start up fine, but it doesn't say that. So I, cynically speaking, see that as a three month free calling window.

      Anyone have info to allay said cynicism?

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
  7. Never woulda thunk it by notque · · Score: 1

    There are exemptions though, like for charities and political organizations.

    Political organizations are exempt?

    Shocking!

    --
    http://use.perl.org
    1. Re:Never woulda thunk it by FearUncertaintyDoubt · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Political organizations are exempt?

      Shocking!

      This is probably a good thing from a certain point of view. If they had tried to restrict political calls, then the whole regulation might have been tossed out on 1st Amendment grounds. It certainly would have clouded the issue, and would have very like have been challenged.

    2. Re:Never woulda thunk it by notque · · Score: 1

      This is probably a good thing from a certain point of view. If they had tried to restrict political calls, then the whole regulation might have been tossed out on 1st Amendment grounds. It certainly would have clouded the issue, and would have very like have been challenged.

      I hadn't thought of that.

      My Sarcasm and general negativity is revoked.

      Thank you kind sir!

      --
      http://use.perl.org
    3. Re:Never woulda thunk it by merky1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      For some reason I don't think the freedom of speech should include the ability to irritate. If it is a "right" to use telemarketing, then it should also be a right to stand in the lobby of some mega-corporation touting a "free willy" sign. Both are invasions of property.

      --
      --WooooHoooo--
    4. Re:Never woulda thunk it by saskwach · · Score: 1

      Pure speculation: 1st Amendment has nothing to do with it; laws don't get passed if they don't have votes and there's no way the US government would pass a law saying that its members' advocates can't call you as you're about to sit down to dinner so they can tell you about the wonders Candidate X will bring to America.

    5. Re:Never woulda thunk it by hobbesmaster · · Score: 1

      So, do you advocate getting rid of gallop polls then?

    6. Re:Never woulda thunk it by Buzz_Litebeer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Acually, he has a point. When you use someones phone, or use there e-mail, you are invading their property with your e-mail/phone call. They pay for the service, and it is up to them how it should be used. You should not have to allow "anyone" to send you anything into your home BECAUSE you pay for a service. You SHOULD have the right, the liberty, to define what does and does not enter your home. When you watch television you are allowing whatever those people want to come into your home, and it is up to you to decide whether you want to turn it off or not.

      When you have a phone you are not requesting the information that people send to you, you are using it as a communications device.

      When a company starts sending unsolicited material, in volume, that might be construed as an invasion of property, a denial of service against your phone so to speak.

      YOU PAY FOR THE PHONE, you should have the RIGHT to say "i dont want MY phone to be used this way"

      because it is YOUR phone, YOUR service.

      if someone signed up for a "i dont want to be part of a gallop poll" list then yes by god that person shouldnt have the gallop poll ringing their house.

      it is not freedom of speech to FORCE someone to listen to, or receive content. It is freedom of speech to ALLOW someone to say there peice, but it is NOT freedom of speech to make someone listen to it.

      That is a captive audience, and thats what telemarkters, TV, and Spammers, all want.

      IT IS NOT THE RIGHT of SPAMMERS, TV, TELEMARKTERS to have a captive audience, or even a "partially captive audience" (ie forcing you to at least allow them to try to talk to you). They can send there message as much as they wwant, but they should not necessarilly be allowed to do it using private infrastructure (the phone to your house).

      The problem is, TV, spammers, etc, are all trying to get into the mode where it is required you listen to someone elses "free speech" or "corporate speech" so that they can try to sell you products. But it is stupid because once you receive the information you paid for, you should be able to block, stop, or edit it for how YOU want to view it.

      but that is becoming illegal, alreayd is illegal in some venues.

      This is really a great victory for privacy advocates because it says people can stop others from using their property, and their infrastructure to annoy them without the ability to stop them.

      --
      If you don't vote, you don't matter, so don't waste your time telling me your opinion
    7. Re:Never woulda thunk it by geekee · · Score: 1

      The phone system isn't really your property however. It's a service you use. It's really the property of AT&T, or whomever, and they should have the right to stipulate in contracts how the phone system is used. As a user, you have the right to accept or refuse the conditions of the service. That's how things would work in a libertarian society anyway. Luckily in this society, there would be multiple phone carriers and you could probably find one that banned phone spam, although it might cost a little more.

      --
      Vote for Pedro
    8. Re:Never woulda thunk it by cmkrcs1 · · Score: 1

      hmmm...

      Government's thinking about itself, not the people. Time for another American Revolution?


      --
      If Windows is running and there's no one there to use it, does it still crash?

      cmkrcs1 was here.
    9. Re:Never woulda thunk it by merky1 · · Score: 1

      I would agree with you if telemarketers help to subsidize the phone systems, which they either don't, or the phone companies are keeping the monies as "profit". Either way, I buy a service from "baby bell" to recieve phone calls. Telemarketers buy a service from "baby bell" to place calls. At no point does the phone company control the calls, or thier content. If they do control the calls, then there are lot more things than just telemarketers that the phone company would need to worry about.

      Since the phone company cannot really dictate how the phone is used, other than by billing for additional services, they cannot dictate the use of the service for marketing purposes. I think this is along the same reasoning that keeps service providers from being responsible for content on thier networks.

      Personally, other than employing under skilled workers, I see no real benefit to telemarketing. I know the only thing I do with calls is string the folks along for about 2 mins in an attempt to drive thier phone bills up (yeah, like 10c is gonna matter to these folks, but it's the principle of the matter).

      --
      --WooooHoooo--
  8. Re:DUDE by wadewilson · · Score: 1
    Sweeeeeeet-ah!

    Well not anything. Didn't they expect a barrel full of monkeys to hit this site the day it rolled out? It's not like the media has been talking about it for months now. Oy. Yea gov t! You rock... I hope the same committe that planned this one out wasn't a part of the budget or we're all be screwed and soon like.

  9. National Call List? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is there a national call list? I am lonely and would like to get more phone calls please.

    1. Re:National Call List? by bytes256 · · Score: 0

      What's your number, Suga ;)

      --

      Slashdot, the site where everything's made up and the points don't matter
    2. Re:National Call List? by KillerHamster · · Score: 1

      Post your number on Slashdot and watch your phone line burn up within minutes!

    3. Re:National Call List? by wren337 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just wait till everyone else signs up for Do Not Call; tens of thousands of telemarketers in their death throes will be calling the remaining 30% of phone numbers. Your phone will be off the hook!

  10. Re:Call registry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    America-centric? Slashdot? Nah.

    Read the fucking FAQ? You? Nah.

  11. Too bad... by nhaze · · Score: 4, Interesting

    this doesn't affect market researchers calling you. Don't get me wrong i'm not complaining, but it would be great if we could somehow get them under the umbrella.

    1. Re:Too bad... by notque · · Score: 2, Insightful

      this doesn't affect market researchers calling you. Don't get me wrong i'm not complaining, but it would be great if we could somehow get them under the umbrella.

      Could we also add ex-girlfriend's to the list?

      --
      http://use.perl.org
    2. Re:Too bad... by yintercept · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I recall that there are exemptions for certain types of research. For example, the BLS has phone surveys on employment research.

      However, a blanket exclusion of "market research" would pretty much nullify the entire program since marketers would just make every call a "research call."

      "Have you every wanted to make a million dollars with no effort?"

      "Have you ever heard the magic three letters 'MLM'?"

    3. Re:Too bad... by chundo · · Score: 1

      Actually, I wish more market researchers would call me. It strikes me that most of the people who take the time to answer their questions are usually the people who just have nothing better to do. It would be nice to get more normal, active people to take part in polls, so we can start seeing a realistic representation of this country's opinions.

      OK OK, I'm not normal or active, but still...

      Fine. I just want more phone calls, alright??

      -j

    4. Re:Too bad... by nhaze · · Score: 1

      As long as they are not selling anything it's not telemarketing. From political polls to what "toilet paper do you wipe your ass with", they can still call you.

    5. Re:Too bad... by mark_lybarger · · Score: 1

      where is the defined? telemarketing isn't always about sales. the marketingdroids would have you think that it includes advertising and brand recognition, etc, etc.

    6. Re:Too bad... by nhaze · · Score: 1

      Telemarketing is defined in:
      US Code, Title 18, Part I, Chapter 113A, Sec. 2325
      http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/2325.html
      (1)means a plan, program, promotion, or campaign that is conducted to induce -
      (A)purchases of goods or services;
      (B)participation in a contest or sweepstakes; or
      (C)a charitable contribution, donation, or gift of money or any other thing of value,by use of 1 or more interstate telephone calls initiated either by a person who is conducting the plan, program, promotion, or campaign or by a prospective purchaser or contest or sweepstakes participant or charitable contributor, or donor; but ...

    7. Re:Too bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Could we also add ex-girlfriend's to the list?


      Could I add my mother to this list? Although if she can't call me she may just send me more stupid chainletters and inspirational greeting cards...

    8. Re:Too bad... by mark_lybarger · · Score: 2, Insightful
      those legal schmucks always paint themselves into a wall with thier wording. this leave phone calls available for any reason outside of what's explicitly defnied above?
      good evening Mr <i>name here</i>,

      i'm conducting a telephone awareness campaign to merely to make people in your neighborhood aware of a really really big sale that Mr. Bob's Ford company is having this weekend.
      that or it will be illegal for church members to call and invite visitors to come back and visit with them again to their church as they are clearly inducing a charitable contribution.
    9. Re:Too bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please have some consideration for other people. It's the few people that participate in the marketing research surveys that make it worthwhile for them to interrupt the rest of us in the middle of dinner.

      They're not trying to help you. They're trying to extract information from you (without paying for it) to help them figure out ways to remove money from your pocket.

  12. Choose the lesser evil. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, as they request your email address when registering your phone number, this sure looks like the spammer's attempt to gather another round of fresh addresses!

  13. more information here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    You can't register here, but much more info at: http://www.ftc.gov/donotcall/

  14. Like their domain name... by zubernerd · · Score: 0, Funny

    donotcall.gov ... does that imply I should not call on the government for anything, or does it mean I should not call the government on the stupid stuff it does. Either way, both are probably true...

    --
    Accentuate the positive, don't waste your mod points on the negative.
    1. Re:Like their domain name... by splattertrousers · · Score: 1, Funny

      ObHomer: Mmmm... donots....

    2. Re:Like their domain name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For all you moderators who WASTED you mod points saying this comment was overrated, I know why you did it... to hide the fact that your dicks and brains are too small to know what else to do with your life.

  15. Automated??? by SuperDuG · · Score: 4, Funny
    I say we start a campaign. Take a phone book and add every number in that phone book to the do not call list.

    Here's my next question, where the hell is my http://donotemail.gov ???

    Scum of the earth, scum of the earth.

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
    1. Re:Automated??? by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

      Take a phone book and add every number in that phone book to the do not call list.

      Man, we're in 2003. I suggest you make a script that queries www.whitepages.com and leave it run overnight instead of typing the entire phone book manually.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:Automated??? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Why not just submit every number from 000-0000 to 999-9999?

    3. Re:Automated??? by LordKaT · · Score: 1
      where the hell is my http://donotemail.gov ???

      Spammers are slightly more evil than Telemarkets. They won't cooperate with a national "do not e-mail" list. In fact, they would probably use it just to spam.

      --LordKaT

    4. Re:Automated??? by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      except it generates an email that you have to then click a link within 72 hrs to verify. I suppose that could be scripted as well, but that would mean a _hell_ of a lot of email.

      Nice idea, though.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    5. Re:Automated??? by FoxIVX · · Score: 1

      I think you mean 000-000-0000 to 999-999-9999. And since the script will have to create a new email account on some local server for every 10 addresses, poll those accounts at least every 72 hours, and then GET the "confirmation" links in them, that's a lot of work and overhead.

      Not to say it couldn't be done, though.

    6. Re:Automated??? by SuperDuG · · Score: 1

      Area Codes ...

      --
      Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
    7. Re:Automated??? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Well, someone in other areas can damn well set up their own script.

    8. Re:Automated??? by kbrunsting · · Score: 1

      Actually in Michigan they are trying to pass a law to start a Do Not Email list. It just made it through the senate this week.

      http://news.com.com/2100-1028_3-1021169.html?tag =f d_top

    9. Re:Automated??? by Eccles · · Score: 1

      Here's my next question, where the hell is my http://donotemail.gov ???

      You should try its equivalent, http://mygoodemailaddressforeveryonenotintheustosp am.gov

      Telemarketers, even if the actual callers are out of the country, generally at least have a U.S. presence and thus can be affected by U.S. law. Spammers have no such problem.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    10. Re:Automated??? by seanmeister · · Score: 1

      Hehehe... I work for a telephone directory publisher. Just a sql SELECT and a Python script away from putting half of my state on the list :-D

    11. Re:Automated??? by Abalamahalamatandra · · Score: 1

      Imagine a Beowulf cluster....

    12. Re:Automated??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's my next question, where the hell is my http://donotemail.gov ???

      There will never exist such a beast since spammers would simply relocate to a country that is not bound by US law. Most spam ccurrently comes from foreign email relays anyway. The only reason that we don't get junk international telespam is due to the cost of the call involved. On that note, it is only a matter of time before the phone system and the internet morph into one and the cost of making an international tele-spam call becomes negligable and tele-spamming resumes. This new registry will only help that technology along.

      Here's an idea:

      -Telespammer relocates to foreign country
      -Telespammer sets up broadband net->VoIP access points in the US
      -Telespammer resumes calling people without worry of US laws since calls originate in foreign country and go through the 'net into the phone system through local VoIP relays

      This would cut the cost of an international call while eliminating the problem with this law.

    13. Re:Automated??? by the-matt-mobile · · Score: 1

      I know you were moderated as "Funny", so I hope people take what you suggested as a joke (you were joking right?)! The only way that this do-not-call list will work is if it is not abused. Otherwise, telemarketers can easily claim that the entire list is bogus, which could potentially lose us the one victory we've had in decades over them!

      The goal here, I think, should be to let telemarketers call those people who don't sign themselves up. If Susie-No-Friends needs calls during dinner so that she has someone to talk to over her Mac-and-Cheese, why should she be deprived of that? If they aren't calling me, that's all that counts. Others can sign themselves up if they want to. Automating a way to add other people's phone numbers to this list gains no further victory. We've already won this battle. Put down your swords and go home.

    14. Re:Automated??? by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Just start at 000-000-0000 and work your way upwards. Have an email server which accepts any email address and forwards it to a bot. So you'd get an email for 000-000-0000@stop-phoning-me.org with the link which you'd then request via an http call. Easy peasy!

      Of course, if they implement a "type in the number in the graphic" stuff, that would be more difficult.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    15. Re:Automated??? by egburr · · Score: 1
      It could easily be scripted. One script in a loop generate a random address on your own mail server and submit the form with the address and phone number. Another script to process the email that comes in response and submit the URL from it.

      If the admins of that site ever get it working right, the email volume from that might even approach the spam volume you already get. Since when does "a couple minutes" mean "in an hour or two"?

      --

      Edward Burr
      Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.
    16. Re:Automated??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RosCo! Them Duke boys been hackin the foan book! Git em!

    17. Re:Automated??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -Boss Hogg

    18. Re:Automated??? by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      >Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.

      more like

      Having a no smoking section in a restaurant is like having a no peeing section in a swimming pool. :-)

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

  16. West of the Big Muddy by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 4, Informative

    you can also call 888.382.1222, east of the Mississippi can call the same number after 7/7/03. Don't forget to ask if they want to switch to AT&T.

  17. In Other News.... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 2, Funny
    Many employees from telemarketing companies were 'laid off' today and mysteriously were seeking jobs working for the National DNC registry. Oddly enough, when asked what position they were looking for, they all answered "anything that works directly with the database of names and their numbers, preferably on a computer with a CD-Burner."

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  18. LOOK AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE by oldwarrior · · Score: 0

    http://www.donotcall.gov/Register/Reg.aspx

    It is running microsoft's ASP.NET

    Probably to an SQL Server backend.

    Think it will keep up / stay up?

    --
    If it were done when 'tis done, then t'were well it were done quickly... MacBeth
    1. Re:LOOK AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE by pavera · · Score: 1

      not unless they've got a cluster of about 100 2 way 3.06ghz xeon boxes running it...

    2. Re:LOOK AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE by oldwarrior · · Score: 1, Funny

      but if this were done in J2EE the design team would still be arguing about which open source middleware to use.

      --
      If it were done when 'tis done, then t'were well it were done quickly... MacBeth
    3. Re:LOOK AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE by pavera · · Score: 1

      That site could have been designed by 1 person in about 2 days... so unless the "design team" has some serious multiple personality disorder, I wouldn't see how there would be much arguing...

    4. Re:LOOK AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Sounds like they need Zeus web server. Runs all of eBay's traffic just fine, better than Apache ever could.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    5. Re:LOOK AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE by cscx · · Score: 1

      The site cgi.ebay.com is running Microsoft-IIS/4.0 on NT4/Windows 98.
      The site www.ebay.com is running Microsoft-IIS/4.0 on NT4/Windows 98.
      The site search.ebay.com is running Zeus/3.3 on Solaris 8.
      The site search-cache.ebay.com is running Apache/1.3.6 (Unix) on Solaris 8.
      The site bibo.ebay.com is running Microsoft-IIS/5.0 on Windows 2000.

  19. fantastic by magwm · · Score: 1

    when is this going to be applied in euroland?

    1. Re:fantastic by Shimbo · · Score: 1

      when is this going to be applied in euroland?

      In the UK, about 4 years ago. Until I'm convinced there is a cross-border cold calling problem to fix, I think it is best solved at the national level.

    2. Re:fantastic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TPS has been around way longer than 4 years. I used to take signup calls for TPS in fact, and that was nearly 7 years ago now. Its been going to decades, and it works.

      Don't forget the TPS can also apply to junk faxes, too.

    3. Re:fantastic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to reply to myself (So soon, too), but here we go

      The Telephone Preference Service, set up by the Direct Marketing Association (UK) Limited (DMA), was originally formed in 1995 as a voluntary self-regulatory mechanism to enable consumers to opt-out of receiving unsolicited sales and marketing calls.

      It became The Law in May 1999.

  20. Phone Number by Atryn · · Score: 1

    According to C|NET the phone number will be 1-888-382-1222. My initial call to the number from my home line generated a "this will soon be available..." message and referred me to the website (which is not responding). :)

    But I'm sure this won't be a popular service or anything....

    --
    Come play Moral Decay!
  21. Why should I sign up... by Howard+Beale · · Score: 1

    when I can sue the bastards???

  22. Yes there is a national call list by benthar · · Score: 4, Funny

    Simply sign up for an AOL account. Or put a valid phone number in your Yahoo E-mail Account. Or you could even go so far as to fill out all of those "Enter to win a car" contests at the local Mall.

  23. Happy the time has come by jaredmauch · · Score: 1
    I'm glad that the time has come for this registry to come online. Now all we need is some similar regulation and compulsory checking for E-Mail addresses against such a registry.

    For those of you that are upset you have to submit your email address, I suggest either using a throwaway free account (hotmail, etc..) or generate some ftc only account on your mail server/system/host for this. I'm a bit upset that i've not received the e-mail confimation yet from their system, and I did have some concern about the "what ifs" of the registry were to become compromised. It would open up some interesting litigation on the telemarketers part against the FTC if they can't "trust the data". I wonder how long until someone can write an email bot that will confirm the registrations and submit every possible phone number to the do-not-call list. I suspect it wouldn't be too hard to do.

    1. Re:Happy the time has come by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1
      Actually, for those idiots who are upset about needing to submit your email address, you don't.

      Read up on the friggin thing.

      If you wait 10 days (or you can already do it now, for those west of the Mississippi) you can just call 1-888-382-1222 from the phone you want on the list, and you'll be put on the list. No email required.

      Stop being so freaking paranoid, they only want the email address so they can let you know that you were put on the list. If they get a call from the actual phone, they'll assume it's by the owner of the phone.

  24. hm... by ed.han · · Score: 1

    couldn't it also being adversely affected by overall I/O issues related to that worm sobig?

    ed

  25. yeah right by sare · · Score: 0

    This is all well and fine until the gov't decides it was not a good idea anymore or decides to stop enforcing it and now there is a very convent list for all telemarketers to use!!!!!!!!! After all they all get a copy to cross check with their list...

    1. Re:yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They already have the list - phone books and compromised phone co servers.

      Hell, like they don't just wardial from 111-111-1111 on through 999-999-9999, modulo the local exchanges.

  26. If charities are exempt by pulse2600 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I can't wait to see companies buying time on charity organization's phone calls. Imagine this:

    1) Company makes donation to charity
    2) Charity promises to advertise company during charity's fund raising calls
    3) Company claims donation on their taxes
    4) ????
    5) Profit!!! (or in the case of the charity: Non-Profit!!!!!)

    1. Re:If charities are exempt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, there is a "non-profit" credit counselling organization out there that has been trying to weasle in under this rule, which calls itself the "Debt Service Center" and has the number 800-880-3767, with an address of "The Awards Center", at 3744 East Chapman, Orange CA 92859.

      This appears to be a mega-boiler room, as they don't know what number you call in on, so you have to give them the special keyword (like "DEBT 4") so they know which one of their scumbag customers' scripts to read.

    2. Re:If charities are exempt by ratamacue · · Score: 1

      The notion of exempting certain agencies is bullshit, and demonstrates the hypocricy of government once again -- and the willingness to invoke the force of government to promote those in power. Both government and charities are trying to sell me on a product or service -- just as every other telemarker is trying to sell me on a product or service.

      Our so-called leaders need to practice what they preach. Make them compete on the same grounds as everyone else in the market, or I don't want anything to do with this law.

    3. Re:If charities are exempt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basically, NPR does exactly this with pledge drives. I wouldn't mind so much except a lot of the challenge grants are really pitiful, on the order of $500 from a fortune 500 company.

      Most other outfits being neither media outlets nor whores to their contributors, will tell a contributor that their donation gets them the standard advert slots in their newsletters and drives, and nothing more.

    4. Re:If charities are exempt by Belgand · · Score: 1

      Charities and political groups should be punished more if anything. I find them far more annoying since they're not just trying to sell me a piece of shit, but just begging. The political calls are the worst. I get them all hours of the day and night and because of exemptions they use pre-recorded messages exclusively.

      I considered trying to actually let this sway my voting and kept a list of every candidate that called my house, but sadly, that was every single candidate in most local elections. What ever happened to the idea of politicians holding themselves to a higher standard or simply not trying to piss off the electorate?

  27. Not a good idea by HowlinMad · · Score: 1

    If you had READ the information on the very FIRST page od the Donotcall.gov site, then you would know that after you sign up, they have up to 3 months to stop calling you. You if you sign up on Oct 1. They can continue to legally call you until Jan 1.

    But I should have known you didn't do any reading, this is Slashdot of course.

  28. Feel the Impotent Power of IIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    You didn't actually expect them to set it up using anything more complicated than an MS-Access database on IIS did you?

    Can you say: Server not responding?

    1. Re:Feel the Impotent Power of IIS by oldwarrior · · Score: 0

      not just iis - aspx Asp.Net in C#!

      --
      If it were done when 'tis done, then t'were well it were done quickly... MacBeth
    2. Re:Feel the Impotent Power of IIS by Schnapple · · Score: 1
      Right, because Apache running on Linux using PHP and MySQL Server never goes down under a good Slashdotting, does it?

      Oh wait that's right - it goes down all the time, too. Not even eating the same dogfood as Slashdot can save it.

      And what evidence is there that it's running on Access?

      Fact is, this is bigger than Slashdot - everyone in the country is hitting this thing.

  29. slashdotting by geekfiend · · Score: 1

    Does slashdotting a US government server constitute terrorism?

    *grins*

    -Joe

  30. Great! by meringuoid · · Score: 1
    So, a national do-not-call list, and maybe a national do-not-email list... I think we'd all be happy not to be deluged with attempted connections from spammers and telemarketers, wouldn't we?

    Now, how about a national do-not-link list? For people who value their bandwidth, and don't particularly want to be linked to from high-traffic news sites?

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    1. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's sort of missing the point. If you set up a web server, and accept public connections, then you're saying you offer a public service. To say "I want someone else to manage who I serve" doesn't make any sense. If you don't want to accept links from a particular site you need to handle that as you're the one deciding to offer something publically.

  31. Spam Gourmet - Disposable addresses by Flamesplash · · Score: 5, Informative

    You should check out Spam Gourmet instead of creating whole yahoo or hotmail accounts. It has worked really well for me.

    --
    "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
    1. Re:Spam Gourmet - Disposable addresses by killmenow · · Score: 4, Informative

      I use spam gourmet with much success as well. I also use privacy.net which works pretty well, too.

    2. Re:Spam Gourmet - Disposable addresses by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 1

      Leave it to a bunch of nerds to slashdot every useful link in this article.
      I'll checkout these whence the slashdot effect has subsided.

      --
      for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
    3. Re:Spam Gourmet - Disposable addresses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for that link. Spam Gourmet looks like a winner.

    4. Re:Spam Gourmet - Disposable addresses by Inda · · Score: 1

      Yes, so confident am I with Spam Gourmet that I even use it on Usenet...

      ...and on here.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    5. Re:Spam Gourmet - Disposable addresses by Lord+Dimwit+Flathead · · Score: 1

      Just make sure to go into advanced mode and setup a watchword or two. Otherwise, someone familiar with the service can easily continue to spam you by generating random new addresses with your username (e.g. aaaaaaaaaa.10.you@spamgourmet.com, aaaaaaaaab.10.you@spamgourmet.com, etc.).

    6. Re:Spam Gourmet - Disposable addresses by Flamesplash · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that was the only concern I had with thee service, though I don't use it for much other than registrations on various sites, not for public stuff. watchword seems like a good idea.

      --
      "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
    7. Re:Spam Gourmet - Disposable addresses by Speed+Racer · · Score: 1

      I found that I needed more spam for SpamBayes to train on so I just started using my actual e-mail address on Usenet and here. It worked like a charm. Now I have over 5000 spam examples and SpamBayes runs like a champ.

      --
      Free Mac Mini. Yes, I'm
    8. Re:Spam Gourmet - Disposable addresses by jqh1 · · Score: 1

      Have no fear -- I'm moving the service over to a beefier host this weekend. The service provider had already required me to move a couple of days ago due to a DOS attack eating up CPU. I reconfigured to ignore the attack, and CPU usage went down. I was telling them everything was going to be OK, and then this morning... boom! :) Anwyay, try again next week...

      --
      who's moderating the meta-moderators?
  32. I wonder how this works? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone know how the list will work? Is a raw list of numbers supplied to the telemarketers, or do they just submit numbers for approval and the committee says ok or no, it's on the list?

    I suspect they'll just be getting a list of raw numbers. I fear this will quickly turn into a handy pre-made "call" list. There are too many exemptions to this national Do Not Call List. Anyone with "prior business" with you, surveys, political announcements, and most importantly the Insurance Industry! It's regulated by a different body and not subject to these rules.

    Don't know about you, but every telemarketing call I get I ask "What are you selling?" They proceed to insist that they're not selling anything, this is just a survey. A few sentences later it becomes apparent what they really are selling.

  33. /. ed? by verrol · · Score: 1

    seems like it has been slashdotted already. I tried to register, but couldn't register.

    1. Re:/. ed? by oldwarrior · · Score: 0

      worked okey dokey for me, including the email verify.

      --
      If it were done when 'tis done, then t'were well it were done quickly... MacBeth
  34. e-mail address by MonkeyDluffy · · Score: 1

    I saw the announcement on news.com this morning, so I registered then - at 6am, there was no problem. You have to give them a valid e-mail address because you have to confirm your request by going to the URL in the e-mail that you are sent within 72 hours.

    -MDL

    --
    Happy meals fund terrorism
    1. Re:e-mail address by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Heh, I suppose it takes a government to need 72 hours to send a confirmation email...I mean, three days?

      Lourens

    2. Re:e-mail address by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Or you could read the post and discover that you have 3 days to click the link. Nice if you give an address you don't check often, or ...

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    3. Re:e-mail address by MonkeyDluffy · · Score: 1

      No, you have 72 hours to confirm your registration. I guess this i their attempt to keep people from abusing the list.
      -MDL

      --
      Happy meals fund terrorism
  35. Re:HEY! I posted this 2 hours ago and was rejected by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Submit it again in a few days, you still have your chances for the dupe.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  36. Okay, you're daft. by greenhide · · Score: 1

    From the website:

    If you register: June 27 - August 31, 2003
    Most telemarketers must stop calling and you may file a complaint: After October 1, 2003
    If you register: September 1, 2003 or after
    Most telemarketers must stop calling and you may file a complaint: Three months after you register

    So it looks like the best time to register would be in late August. After that, you're always going to have a three month period they can bug you.

    --
    Karma: Chevy Kavalierma.
  37. best part of moving by AssFace · · Score: 1

    I always avoid the phone, I hate it.
    even moreso, I hate having to answer the phone and then it isn't even anyone I know and they want me to listen to them.
    and it is always obvious that they don't like what they are doing.

    ugh - everything about it is awful.

    but since I have moved, for whatever reason, there is no telemarketing here at all. probably b/c there is either a law against it, there is not enough return on investment, or the place is so small (about 65K people) that people would start to recognize the people on the phone ("Carl?! Is that you? Why you callin' me?!")

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
    1. Re:best part of moving by notque · · Score: 1

      I always avoid the phone, I hate it.

      Hell yeah!

      even moreso, I hate having to answer the phone and then it isn't even anyone I know and they want me to listen to them.

      Sing it from the roof tops!

      and it is always obvious that they don't like what they are doing

      And it's always obvious I don't like what they are doing either!

      ugh - everything about it is awful.

      Amen!

      but since I have moved, for whatever reason, there is no telemarketing here at all. probably b/c there is either a law against it, there is not enough return on investment, or the place is so small (about 65K people) that people would start to recognize the people on the phone

      Where ya live? I'm a movin there!

      --
      http://use.perl.org
    2. Re:best part of moving by AssFace · · Score: 1

      I've moved to Bermuda with my fiancee.

      No telemarketers, but my DSL costs $250 a month, but there are no taxes, but everything costs more, but the weather is great, but there are tourists, but you can play golf, but I suck at golf.... it goes on and on, but in the end, this place rules.

      --

      There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
    3. Re:best part of moving by mink · · Score: 1

      Do your frozen yogurt toppings contain potassium benzoate?

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
    4. Re:best part of moving by AssFace · · Score: 1

      damn cursed monkey paw

      --

      There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
  38. Re:Wrong by notque · · Score: 1

    That's not his email address. sorry. ;)

    bgates@hotmail.com?

    --
    http://use.perl.org
  39. Blah. by nege · · Score: 3, Informative

    No. Placing your number on the National Do Not Call Registry will stop most, but not all, telemarketing calls. Some businesses are exempt from the national registry and still can call you even if you place your number on it. Exempt businesses include:

    * long-distance phone companies
    * airlines
    * banks and credit unions; and
    * the business of insurance, to the extent that it is regulated by state law.

    Uhm...yea the exempt list manages to get exempt just about 80% of all my telemarketing calls. woohoo! Not to mention the local paper (Times Dispatch) that calls every week, but manages to also tie in your subscription to a charity. I guess I'll go get a fake email addy and sign up anyway.

    1. Re:Blah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The FCC decided yesterday to apply the same rules to companies under its jurisdisction, including phone companies.

    2. Re:Blah. by segfault7375 · · Score: 5, Informative

      From a CNN article:

      The FCC voted 5-0 Thursday to add its authority to the do-not-call list and to plug holes in its protections. The registry will now also block telemarketers from industries whose calls the FCC regulates, including airlines, banks and telephone companies.

      Nice!

    3. Re:Blah. by MImeKillEr · · Score: 1

      Just use SpamGourmet and set up an address that expires.

      Usage: [keyword.number.username@spamgourmet.org]

      Like: donotcall.6.nege@spamgourmet.org

      After 6 emails (or whatever number you specify) the address is deleted. This way, if they actually need to send you anything (confirmation, etc) then they'll get through until the address expires.

      I use it whenever I order pizza online from the local places.

      --
      Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
    4. Re:Blah. by bluetea · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're wrong about that.

      The FCC (as opposed to the FTC) regulates calls made by the industries you list. The FCC recently voted to support the registry, so that loophole has been closed.


      This CNN article mentions it.

    5. Re:Blah. by Surak · · Score: 1

      Funny thing is 80% of *my* telemarketing calls are from long-distance phone companies trying to get me to switch my service and people trying to sell me [auto, home, health, life] insurances. So I suppose there isn't any point for me to sign up is there? :)

    6. Re:Blah. by AmishSlayer · · Score: 1

      I got rid of my land line several years ago and I have had only one call from my cabel company... I told them it was a cell phone and they never called back. Thats right only one solicitation in 3 years!! j00t!

      I understnad this won't work for a family or people living out in the boones, but sooner or later cell phones will be cheap enough and the service will be ubiquitous enough to accomodate everyone.... but if that happens then I am sure interest groups will thow enough money around to change the current cell phone lwas

    7. Re:Blah. by YaRness · · Score: 1

      if this is true (which other comments seem to indicate it may no longer be), most telemarketing calls are done by out-sourced call centers. THEY will not be allowed to call you, and it may be a long time before a company decides they want to go back to doing in-house telemarketing.

      (i stole this idea blatantly from a post in the discussion on this on arstechnica)

    8. Re:Blah. by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      --No. Placing your number on the National Do Not Call Registry will stop most, but not all, telemarketing calls. Some businesses are exempt from the national registry and still can call you even if you place your number on it. Exempt businesses include:

      * long-distance phone companies--

      Damn! That's the worst one. MCI calls me every day trying to get me to switch. I thought MCI went under.

    9. Re:Blah. by Atlantix · · Score: 1

      You're right that those businesses are exempt according to the FTC but that is because the FTC has no authority over those businesses. The FCC does and check out this quote from the CNN article at http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/06/27/do.not.c all.ap/index.html

      "The FCC voted 5-0 Thursday to add its authority to the do-not-call list and to plug holes in its protections. The registry will now also block telemarketers from industries whose calls the FCC regulates, including airlines, banks and telephone companies."

      So sign up, it will be worth it.

      --Atlantix

    10. Re:Blah. by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1

      Doesn't your phone company have a privacy manager feature? SBC/Ameritech does although it's about $4/month. I don't get telemarketing calls anymore because 99% of them would show up on caller ID as out of area or private caller, etc. and get booted to privacy manager where they have to announce themselves and I can choose to pick it up or not. Frankly, this has eliminated all of the automated cold calls I used to get. Well worth the money.

    11. Re:Blah. by chundo · · Score: 1

      So, basically everyone is exempt except the industries who forgot to pay their lobbyists this year...

      -j

    12. Re:Blah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Your .sig: Howard Dean for America

      I prefer Howard the Duck. He's more intellegent.

    13. Re:Blah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Privacy manager is a fucking protection racket and SBC/Ameritech can go sit and rotate.
      Caller ID blocking should be completely illegal. Want privacy use a frigging payphone for your illegal phone calls like all the drug dealers.

    14. Re:Blah. by Geekenstein · · Score: 1

      Except for one detail. The FCC voted yesterday to share the list with the FTC, making most of those calls illegal too. One more step.

    15. Re:Blah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slick, knock someone's intelligence when you yourself are unable to cut-and-paste a four-word signature correctly...

    16. Re:Blah. by ajs · · Score: 1

      Worse, you have to ask yourself: will putting your phone number on a list of people who consider their phone important increase or decrease the number of calls you get? If I can claim to be one of the exempt groups, I would start by whipping out a copy of that list, and calling everyone on it!

    17. Re:Blah. by goodhell · · Score: 1

      I sent this email out to my family not too long ago.

      Here's some info on the Do Not Call list. I know some of you have already received this, but here's a reminder. The registry opens in July. And if you are sick of telemarketers then get on the list.

      Websites:
      http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/edcams /donotcall/
      http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/a lerts/dncalrt .htm

      For those of you in Idaho:
      https://www2.state.id.us/ag/consumer/nocal llist.ht m

      Junk mail:
      http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/alerts/ optouta lrt.htm

      Some important things to remember (taken from the FAQ from the second hyperlink):

      6. Because so many kinds of companies are exempt from the TSR, won't this new national "do not call" registry have a lot of holes?
      No. All professional telemarketing companies must comply with the TSR, even if they are making sales calls on behalf of a company that is not covered. Failing to comply may subject the telemarketing company to a fine of $11,000 for each call that is not in compliance with the Rule.

      So when you hear "This is so-and-so calling on behalf of ...." the telemarketing company may not be in compliance with the law. Notice that a lot of the phone companies and banks will do this, and although they are exempt from the do-not-call list, the telemarketing company may not be in compliance!

      10. I get lots of calls soliciting money for political organizations or for charities - will the national "do not call" registry stop those types of calls?
      Political solicitations are not covered by the TSR. Telemarketers calling to solicit charitable contributions are not required to drop registered numbers from their call lists, but if you make a request to a specific organization that they not call you, they are required to honor your request. If they subsequently call you again, they may be subject to a fine of $11,000.

      21. I've noticed that when telemarketers call, my caller ID says "number not available" or something like that. Are you doing anything about that?
      When the amended TSR goes into effect, telemarketers will be required to transmit their telephone number, and if possible, their name , to your Caller ID service. While it is technologically possible to transmit callers' numbers nearly everywhere now, transmission of callers' names may not be available everywhere yet. Transmission of callers' ID information will enable you to know who is calling. This provision will take effect one year after the release of the Rule.

      22. I've noticed that when telemarketers call, there's often a long pause before anyone comes on the line. This annoys me. Can't you do anything about that?
      The amended TSR will greatly reduce the number of "dead air" or hang-up calls you receive from telemarketers. "Dead air" or hang-ups result from telemarketers' use of automatic dialing equipment that sometimes calls too many numbers for the number of sales representatives the telemarketer has available to handle the calls. When this happens, you rush to answer the phone, only to find no one there. The TSR has new provisions that will greatly decrease this practice. In the few instances when the telemarketer does not have an operator ready, it must play a recorded message letting you know who they are and their telephone number - but a sales pitch is prohibited by law . Also, to give you time to answer the phone, the telemarketer must let the your phone ring for at least 15 seconds or four rings before hanging up.

      23. What other protections are there against unwanted telemarketing calls?
      The TSR protects you from unwanted late-night telemarketing calls - calling times are restricted to the hours between 8 a.m. and 9 p.m . In addition the TSR requires telemarketers who call you to promptly tell you the identi

  40. Nice *cough* Design *cough* by BlueTooth · · Score: 1

    The funtionality seems fine, and that's all I _really_ care about, but why does it seem like this site was designed by a three year old?

    But seriously, it seems somewhat counterproductive that the Fed do this _after_ so many states have set up local services. I meen this makes those registries useless.

    --
    SPAM
  41. hungry? try donutcall.gov by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tasty fresh donuts shipped fresh from Washington, DC overnight to your doorstep! (subsidized thanks to the new tax cut)

    Don't forget to ask about our new "G Holes"!!!

  42. What about. . . by LordGibson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My concern regarding this list is how it may be used by the exempt entities. All of these political and non-profit organizations are free to interrupt my dinnertime at will. What's to keep them from harvesting this uber-list to augment their dialing pool? I may just wind up with more telemarketing calls after I jump on this registry than I ever did before. Granted they'll be "for a good cause" but I prefer to choose my own causes, thank you very much!

    1. Re:What about. . . by protoshoggoth · · Score: 1

      In regard to the phone numbers--they're not e-mail addresses. It's not as if a list of valid, mainly listed phone numbers is particularly valuable in and of itself. The phone company provides such lists to anyone who asks. I'd imagine that a list of phone numbers of people who have gone out of their way to say that they don't want to receive unsolicited calls is even less valuable.

  43. Great way to get numbers. by SphynxSR · · Score: 1

    This is a great way for charities and such to get numbers. As well as when the goovernment is sued by the telemarketing firms. They will have a better list than before.

    --

    I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
  44. Site is FUBAR... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forget /.'d, they are completely FUBAR'd... And to think that the Telemarketers thought that no one would sign up! That said, I think they're talking out the side of their mouths as I have received more telemarketing calls in the past two days than I've received in months - mostly those automated calls (that are actually illegal)... Even on my cell phone!

    Maybe the FTC should have called Taco to ask for tips on building a site that could have actually handled the load?

    I can't wait to sign up every phone # I'm associated with at home and work.... Hope those jerks have to go out and get real jobs...

  45. This is a new thing? by LinuxGeek · · Score: 4, Funny

    I have had several ladies tell me that I was on their don't call list. How can one get this entry cleared?

    --

    Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see. - Mark Twain
    1. Re:This is a new thing? by brakk · · Score: 1

      Shower?

    2. Re:This is a new thing? by LinuxGeek · · Score: 1
      Shower?

      I took care of that already this morning, so that isn't the problem. Well, back to my "Howard Stern's tips to get hot chicks" guide.
      --

      Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see. - Mark Twain
  46. The ramifications by hoover10001 · · Score: 1
    Great, now all I'll get are "personal" phone calls from every politician's voice system.
    Hi, this is [candidate name]. Please vote for me for [candidate position]. This message was sponsored by Rick's Roofing.
    1. Re:The ramifications by DirkDaring · · Score: 1

      And that would be an $11,000 fine.

      Dirk

  47. Microsoft Bush by berkeleyjunk · · Score: 1

    "Hi. I am calling for Microsoft for Bush. Would you like to buy a copy of XP cookies for the Bush repurchase oops re-election campaign?"

  48. /.ed'em did we... by Sfing_ter · · Score: 1

    As of 7am Fri. Jun 27, 2003, the reg page is unavailable...

    Didn't know EVERYONE on /. was going to go at once...

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. Emo Philips
  49. either that or... by mblase · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...the telemarketers DoS'ed the site first. Bastards!

  50. National do call list by tazan · · Score: 1

    So if charities, surveys, and political groups are exempt have we now created a national database of valid phone numbers for them to call? I new a guy that was an encyclopedia salesman. He always looked for houses with no solicitor signs. He said that their husbands put the signs up because she'd buy anything.

  51. WTF? and FYI by travdaddy · · Score: 1

    Exemptions also include long-distance phone companies and credit card companies. How did they get through?

    Also, since the site is now slashdotted, I looked on cnn.com and noticed that registration using 1-888-382-1222 is available in states west of the Mississippi River, including Minnesota and Louisiana.

    --
    Adidas To Bring Back Sneakernet
    1. Re:WTF? and FYI by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      The FTC doesn't regulate either type of business call. However, the FCC, who does, have voted to have these businesses bound by the list too. Additionally, companies who call on behalf of either type of business are not exempt.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  52. i did this two hours ago by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Interesting

    i filled out their online form 2 hours before this slashdot story was posted, and i haven't gotten an email from them yet

    is this in line with everyone else's experiences?

    i'm not actually surprised, their site is hammered, i'm just wondering if i am the rule or the exception ;-)

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:i did this two hours ago by elsegundo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, me too.

      Apparently AT&T is running this show. I would think online registry for this would be wildly popular, so it would be prudent to set up a robust web presence. One would think that AT&T is capable of this.

      begin mandatory ./ MS-bash...

      They're probably using MS crap, anyway... :)

      end mandatory ./ MS-bash

      --


      The revolution will be televised. Blackout restrictions apply.
    2. Re:i did this two hours ago by mcwop · · Score: 1

      Me too, no return email yet.

      --

      "I don't think it's selfish, to eat defenseless shellfish." -NOFX

    3. Re:i did this two hours ago by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      poops ;-(

      we hammered them

      it's a national "do not slashdot" website now ;-(

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    4. Re:i did this two hours ago by Hallow · · Score: 1

      It seems I'm experiencing the same thing. I think their pipe is a little too small (or their servers).

    5. Re:i did this two hours ago by macemoneta · · Score: 1

      I registered three numbers, and got back three emails. However, there's a bug in their code; two of the confirmations were for the same number, so the third number never got registered. Now I have to go through that two hour long process again. Great.

      --

      Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

    6. Re:i did this two hours ago by MonkeyDluffy · · Score: 1

      I did it at 6am EST, and I had the e-mail within a few seconds. So they are *overloaded*.
      -MDL

      --
      Happy meals fund terrorism
    7. Re:i did this two hours ago by prockcore · · Score: 1

      I got my email confirmation immediately. This was at 1am MST friday morning.

      That brings up a good point, however, you have to click on a link in the email within 72 hours, but what happens if their servers are down and they don't send the email within 72 hours?

    8. Re:i did this two hours ago by WeirdKid · · Score: 1
      Did it last night (early in the morning). Got my email, but the web site is experiencing difficulties:

      We're sorry. The National Do Not Call Registry is currently experiencing technical difficulties. To register, call 888-382-1222; for TTY, the number is 866-290-4236; or return to this web site later. (6/27/2003 2:17:53 PM/21)

    9. Re:i did this two hours ago by WeirdKid · · Score: 1
      Damn. Spoke too soon. Tried three more times and I got this:

      REGISTRATION COMPLETE You have registered the following telephone number in the National Do Not Call Registry: 248-xxx-xxxx This registration will be effective until 6/28/2008. Please print a copy of this page for your records.

  53. My brother is a part time telemarketer... by Kadagan+AU · · Score: 4, Informative

    He hates his job, but it pays him... They get around the do not call list because they're not "technically" telemarketing. They give away something for free. Free demonstrations. ;-) All that they do over the phone is try and get people to accept a free demonstration of some product. The sales people who go do the demo are the ones trying to sell stuff. I wonder if many other companies will be using techniques like this now?

    --
    This space for rent, inquire within.
    1. Re:My brother is a part time telemarketer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The term should be changed to "teleharassment" then.

    2. Re:My brother is a part time telemarketer... by stanmann · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think you will find that the FTC will determine that like someone "giving a survey" about buying a product with a sales pitch at the end, that the phone call is initiating a sale, and therefore prohibited, but I could be wrong. I couldn't find a place to submit this question, but this

      Q: Who is covered by the National Do Not Call Registry?

      A: The National Do Not Call Registry applies to any plan, program or campaign to sell goods or services through interstate phone calls. This includes telemarketers who solicit consumers, often on behalf of third party sellers. It also includes sellers who provide, offer to provide, or arrange to provide goods or services to consumers in exchange for payment.

      would suggest that you are engaged in a "program or campaign" to "arrange to provide goods or services to consumers"

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    3. Re:My brother is a part time telemarketer... by kiolbasa · · Score: 1

      A common rule about spammers is that they all define spam as that which they do not do. The same goes for phone spammers, telemarketers. They define telemarketing in a way that excludes their particular pitch method.

      I would say that this two-stage sales method is a violation, since they are generating the initial lead through the cold call. They are free to try such a scheme with people on the do not call list. If they call me after October 1, when enforcement begins, I will report them to the FTC for violating the telemarketing rule just the same. Then we will see just how effective the new rule is.

      And does anyone else just love the Google ads that come up on this story? Right now, I'm looking at one for the TeleZapper, and three for telemarketing scumbags selling lists.

      --

      Beer wants to be free
    4. Re:My brother is a part time telemarketer... by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1
      "All that they do over the phone is try and get people to accept a free demonstration of some product. "

      Well, we'll find out in October, because any attempt to get me into talking distance of a sales rep is going to be reported as a violation of the law. "Free demos", "appointment setting", and "buy this and we'll give a penny to charity" are all sales spiels.

    5. Re:My brother is a part time telemarketer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go ahead, make my day. I bet that when I sue someone's ass off in order to collect my easy money, the judge will be unamused by this "defense." Yes, tell your brother to please call me after I'm on this list and and give me a Free Demonstration in How to Make Money Fa$t from Telemarketer Stupidity.

    6. Re:My brother is a part time telemarketer... by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

      Now they will, you dolt. Nice job letting out the secret. :)

    7. Re:My brother is a part time telemarketer... by Kadagan+AU · · Score: 1

      very nice point, but where it says "arrange to provide goods or services to consumers" it does mention "in exchange for payment". they give the service (demonstration) for free. Just trying to promote a discussion on this, you could be quite right ;)

      --
      This space for rent, inquire within.
    8. Re:My brother is a part time telemarketer... by stanmann · · Score: 1

      And the demonstration doesn't include a sales pitch?? they demo and leave?? I'm just curious about how this might work. I would guess that if they move the sale to a customer initiated phone call after the demo, then Perhaps they might get off with the whole bit, as in
      Would you like a demo guy to come by.
      Demo guy comes by, leaves business card
      Guy calls Demo guy and buys item.
      I couldn't find anywhere on the FTC site to send questions or call with further questions... So this is just theoretical discussion anyhow.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    9. Re:My brother is a part time telemarketer... by Kadagan+AU · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that might work out well. If I had more info on how they actually conduct business I'd gladly share it, but as I said, it's my brother's job. I'm a sys admin ;). He's started to explain this stuff to me a few times before, but he stopped when my snoring interrupted him.

      --
      This space for rent, inquire within.
  54. Next - National Do-Not-Email list by chief-dot · · Score: 1

    A list of email addresses to make available to spammers so that they can do the right thing.

    Sounds like a great idea...but something makes me feel there could be a fundamental problem with giving a list like that to spammers...hmmm....

  55. Isn't this wrong? by SeanTobin · · Score: 1, Funny

    Isn't there something inherently wrong about slashdotting a anti-telemarketing site? I'm all for it (well, against it depending on your pov) and I'm sure the news headlines will include "Federal do not call list swamped with over 3 million users in first 12 hours." Unfortunately its looking like about 4 of those 3 million users will actually be able to sign up.

    Also, what's with the e-mail address requirement? Is that so people don't sign thier neighbors up to not get calls at dinnertime or something?

    --
    Karma: SELECT `karma` FROM `users` WHERE `userid`=138474;
    1. Re:Isn't this wrong? by mrpuffypants · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that'd really piss me off if my friends submitted me so that I wasn't ever bothered again.

      I'd really have to yell at 'em!

  56. concerned about email? register by phone. by twiggy · · Score: 2, Informative

    For all of you complaining that they require a valid email address - If you're that concerned, you can just wait until July 7th when you can register by phone, rather than using the 'net...

    Of course.. you'll have to speak to an actual human being.. but hey, you can't win 'em all ;-)

    --
    http://www.babysmasher.com
    http://www.openingbands.com
  57. I knew it!!! by idleprocess · · Score: 1

    So I hear about the donotcall.gov registry site and go there to register...

    Wait, wait, wait...

    Man, must be alot of folks registering...

    Or....

    Damn you slashdot!!!

    ;)

    --
    :wq!
  58. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    billg@microsoft.com

  59. morons declare almost all of US infected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with whoreabully violeNT greed/fear based MiSlesions.

    that's you too robbIE. lookout bullow. many of US are weigh past pairannoyed buy now.

    consult with yOUR creator. that's the spirit.

    the daze of the evile wons is passing.

  60. Re:Wrong by byolinux · · Score: 1, Informative

    Nah, it's billg@microsoft.com - you might even get a form letter if you're lucky.

  61. Remember - FCC Rules and TCPA are STILL in effect! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The new Federal Trade Commission regulations and the national do-not-call list is all fine and dandy, but the FCC still has its rules that telemarketers may try to get away with violating.

    Telemarketing calls to mobile phones have been illegal for a long time, and consumers shouldn't have to worry about waiting until October 1st for scumbags to comply with existing law.

    See FCC Complaint Page for information on how to file an FCC Form 475 online. I've done it several times, and it's satisfying to know how many fines I've precipitated. (There's a sidebar on that page that permits you to download a PDF version of their quarterly reports).

  62. This is a scam - read the fine print! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, check this excerpt from the business FAQ:

    "Some businesses are exempt from the National Do Not Call Registry, including:

    * long-distance phone companies
    * airlines
    * banks and credit unions; and
    * the business of insurance, to the extent that it is regulated by state law."

    OK, so the biggest offender is exempt! Political parties, charities, religions are also exempt as are INTRAstate calls. So, essentially, everyone.

    Also note that there is a 3 month lag from when you register until when your entry must take effect ... OK, so we've just created a new opt-in phonespam list. Nice.

    Maybe if we didn't have a coin-operated CONgress, we wouldn't have this crap.

    AC

  63. 108 per second by Aging_Newbie · · Score: 2, Informative

    According to radio news the site this morning (before Slashdot) was registering 108 people per second, not a bad rate.

    1. Re:108 per second by nytes · · Score: 1

      I wonder how many hits are from outside the U.S.

      --
      -- I have monkeys in my pants.
  64. UK Version by barcodez · · Score: 1

    We have had an opt out system in the UK for a few years now and it does work. Snail Mail Spam http://www.mpsonline.org.uk/mpsr/html/default.asp Telephone Spam http://www.tpsonline.org.uk/tpsr/html/default.asp

    --

    ----
  65. EVERYONE knows it's billg@microsoft.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right? It's not some big secret or anything.

  66. This will not stop telemarketers by thinkliberty · · Score: 1

    All call centers will become charities. "1% of your total purchase will go toward a worthy cause."

    Only Now they have a list of phone numbers and email addresses to contact.

    1. Re:This will not stop telemarketers by TheShadow · · Score: 1

      Actually:

      "31. There appear to be many exemptions to the National Do Not Call Registry. Will the number
      of telemarketing calls I get really be reduced?

      Yes. All professional telemarketing companies must comply with the Telemarketing Sales Rule, even if they are making sales calls on behalf of a company that is not covered. Failing to comply may subject the telemarketing company to a fine of up to $11,000 for each call that is not in compliance."

      That is from a PDF on the FTC website (http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/alerts/dncalr t.pdf).

      This tells me that if XYZ Telemarketing is contracted by ABC Charity to do marketing calls, the Do Not Call list is still in effect. But if ABC Charity were to do the calls directly, it wouldn't.

      I think that is a pretty fair compromise. I don't mind a little old lady from the church down the street calling me. But I do mind a snotty brat in a call center giving me crap because I say that I'm not interested.

      --

      --
      "What do you want me to do? Whack a guy? Off a guy? Whack off a guy? Cause I'm married."
  67. Exemption Explanation by unfortunateson · · Score: 4, Informative

    Someone above quoted the FAQ that lists the exempt industries. (He also left off the second part: "You may still receive calls from political organizations, charities, telephone surveyors or companies with which you have an existing business relationship.")

    I think it sucks too, but there's a reason for it: The Federal Trade commission is the one creating this list, and only those industries regulated by them are controllable by this list. For instance, phone companies are regulated by the FCC.

    *&$% Congress should have plugged this hole by unifying a do-not-call across the various regulatory agencies.

    You can bet that congressional campaigns were probably specifically exempted by the bill, though.

    --
    Design for Use, not Construction!
    1. Re:Exemption Explanation by kiolbasa · · Score: 1

      You're right that telephone companies and other common carriers are not subject to the FTC rule, neither are banks. But they are still bound to the TCPA. They still have to maintain their own do-not-call lists, they just get one free shot at you. This makes it easier for you to keep track of which companies you have asked not to call you anymore. Just banks and common carriers, rather than every single company in America with some crap to sell.

      It's still not perfect, but better than before. If calls increase from those exempt industries, I hope that government will come up with something better, like a do-not-call amendment to the TCPA. They did finally get this much passed, but I wouldn't hold my breath.

      I'm pretty sure I'm on every major long-distance carrier's do-not-call lists, since I haven't gotten a call from one of them in more than a year. But most of my telemarketing calls come from banks, as in credit card offers. And there are alot more banks to keep track of than long-distance carriers.

      And the last political campaign that called me got chewed out. It would be in politician's best interest to not call people who don't want to be called, so as not to lose voters.

      --

      Beer wants to be free
  68. There's one disadvantage to this list by Theovon · · Score: 0

    The only drawback here is that the list will improve business for phone companies. Since land lines will become less of an annoyance to people, they'll start using them again (I switched to cellular a long time ago). I hate all phone companies. Monopolies are evil.

    1. Re:There's one disadvantage to this list by cookiepus · · Score: 1

      Since land lines will become less of an annoyance to people, they'll start using them again (I switched to cellular a long time ago). I hate all phone companies. Monopolies are evil.

      You mean "cellular" service isn't offered by "phone companies" ?

    2. Re:There's one disadvantage to this list by Theovon · · Score: 1

      The competition in the "cellular" realm is better because you can choose your provider. With land-lines, you are stuck with whoever owns your area.

    3. Re:There's one disadvantage to this list by cookiepus · · Score: 1

      Nonsense, the post said "we don't want to help phone companies." Most players in the cell field are phone companies: at&t, sprint, xingular, verizon. By advocating cellular, one generally advicates putting more money in the pockets of those companies.

      Personally, I don't care - I am just happy getting the service. But if one "hates phone companies" (whatever the hell that means) then one should be a little more elaborate in one's plans to deprive them of profit.

  69. Good start... by yngv · · Score: 1

    Now where's the f**king DO NOT SPAM list for my email?

  70. not-for-profit calls by missing000 · · Score: 1

    Most of the time, not-for-profit calls, polls (except those that try to sell things), and electorial calls are not covered by no-call lists.

    1. Re:not-for-profit calls by Teese · · Score: 1
      According to the fed's Do not call FAQ there are whole industries that are exempt for some stupid reason that more than likely involves money. Those industries are: long-distance phone companies, airlines, banks and credit unions, and the business of insurance

      It really upsets me that these business are exempt (even though they can't use a professional telemarketing firm, according the posted faq), There is no reason that I would want to get calls from these business as opposed to others.

      I really like my state's (Wisconsin) no-call list (except for the 2 year limit opposed to the federal 5 year limit). The only exemptions make some sense (previous business relationship, non-profits, politicians, surveys), and they require that all telemarketers not block Caller ID, that's great thinking if you ask me.

      --
      "I'm a Genius!"*


      *Not an actual Genius
    2. Re:not-for-profit calls by mlyle · · Score: 1

      The reason is regulatory oversight. The FTC is not the primary regulator for airlines (the FAA is), phone companies (FCC), banks/credit unions (DOT), or insurance (states). As the FTC is not empowered by charter to regulate commerce by those organizations, the do not call list currently does not apply to them (as this is an FTC initiative).

      The FCC is looking into rulemaking that would apply the FTC's DNC list to phone companies.

    3. Re:not-for-profit calls by Radical+Rad · · Score: 1
      I'm not convinced that 'previous business relationship' and 'surveys' are good exemptions. On the surface they would seem to make sense but I think places you have to do business with like grocery stores and department stores and banks will start selling memberships to become their "associate". Then, purveyors of non-Scottish crap will call you on the pretense that you did business with the "association" rather than the one exclusive vendor.

      And I probably don't even have to point out how easy it is to make a cold call purporting to be a survey. Instead of a recorded message saying "Hi! I'm Sandra. I'm calling to tell you that you are pre-approved for the smAcme Debt Consolidation Program with low, low rates...", instead it will be "Hi! I'm Sandra. Please express your views in our survey. Press One or wait on the line for yes, or two for no. Question one: Have you heard about the smAcme Debt Consolidation Program with its low, low rates? Two, did you know that you have already been approved? ..."

    4. Re:not-for-profit calls by Alan+Holman · · Score: 0

      Airlines, banks, phone companies, and insurance companies, usually hire market research firms to do their calling, however. Market Research, which covers such non-sales calls as telephone surveys and recruitment calls for focus groups, does not follow Do Not Call lists, because research, even market research, is recognised by North American goverments as being important. For more information about Market Research, read the Itracks web-site.

  71. 9:45 GMT-5 and slashdotted already by dkh2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I guess we're going to have to wait a few hours on this.

    BTW, The e-mail address is so they can verify. You MUST respond to their e-mail within 72 hours or the registration is cancelled.

    Next step, a national Do Not Email registry.

    --
    My office has been taken over by iPod people.
    1. Re:9:45 GMT-5 and slashdotted already by gurps_npc · · Score: 1

      The only problem is that for the Do Not Email registry, they will ask that you give a phone number that they will all and verify. And of course, they will not be able to call you because you have alread put in a Do not call. list. And t

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  72. It's actually an automated call... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If your west of the Mississippi River, you can call 1-888-382-1222 today. The rest of the nation is open to it after 7/7

  73. Forgot one by missing000 · · Score: 1

    Also, sales calls from parties with "established business relationships" are usually exempt.

    1. Re:Forgot one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prior business relationships afford them *one* phone call. You can then tell them "no more" and they're done. One-and-done isn't so bad unless they repurpose the information. "Oh, hi, this is...." "Yes, you had division take you off their list but this is division and we were spun off as another company."

  74. Read their privacy policy... by aksansai · · Score: 2, Informative

    I personally do not care that they have my email address. To not be interrupted four times while sitting at my table for dinner is priceless. Besides - what makes you guys think that the government has no clue what your email address is??

    Their Privacy Policy states: "If you contact us via the Internet, we also collect your email address to confirm your registration request. We will store your email address in a secure manner, separate from your telephone number. We will not share your email address with telemarketers." That's good enough for me.

    --
    Ayup
    1. Re:Read their privacy policy... by BDew · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ah, yes, but this only shows your lack of sophistication. Believing the government, how quaint. This would be a much better response, guaranteed to get you boatloads of positive moderation:

      "The DoNotCall registry has a privacy policy which states that the e-mail address is only used for confirmation and will be stored separately from the phone numbers. Fortunately, I am too wise to fall for this dastardly scheme thought up by the evil genius of Dick Cheney and Karl Rove. Because of my vaunted sophistication, I know for certain that this is a fig leaf to cover the insertion of this data into the TIA database run by the war criminals Don Rumsfeld and John Poindexter. Further, thanks to my superior intellectual ability, I am sure that the oil barons who control GWB will use the e-mail addresses for spamming in an effort to make even more money. The only way for us to be safe is to hope that Howard Dean is elected this year. And, of course, to make sure that the Supreme Court doesn't get a chance to rig the election again. Until that happens, I will be much too smart to include myself on this purported "DoNotCall" List, which I think will be sold by the Republican Party to the highest bidder."

      See, that wasn't so hard! Now you too can comment on political issues here at Slashdot and reap the ever increasing karma rewards!

      --
      "Fifty million Americans can't be wrong," said Rep. Billy Tauzin. Gore - 50,999,897 Bush - 50,456,002
    2. Re:Read their privacy policy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This is from the privacy policy of CA:
      Because of the nature of the Do Not Call program, the telephone number you furnish will be disseminated to telemarketers for the express purpose of not being called. The information may not be sold or used for any other purpose.
      Why is that? What happened to one-way encryption?
  75. It sucks by giminy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Exemptions:

    - Charities
    - Companies you have "done business with" (ie you bought something from them)
    - Long Distance companies
    - Insurance companies
    - Banks (including credit card companies)
    - Airlines
    - Political fundraisers
    - Overseas telemarketers


    It's all Right here. In my opinion it's hardly worth registering. "Professional" telemarketing companies could become phone number resellers. Professional telemarketers would get the list from the do not call registry, then sell the list to private companies' in-house telemarketers. Since it's legal for most private companies to call you still, and they now have a list with your correct phone number, your calls may increase, not decrease.

    --
    The Right Reverend K. Reid Wightman,
    1. Re:It sucks by Torqued · · Score: 1

      But those people that go and actually sign up for the Do Not Call list are also likely to be more aware that they can come back to donotcall.gov and file a complaint and that the offending companies can be fined up to US$11,000 per violation.

      Also, if you'll read the FAQ once their servers recover, they are hoping to close some of the "loopholes" that you mention above.

    2. Re:It sucks by MImeKillEr · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are ways around this as well :

      1) Telling them to remove you from their list. Get the name and phone number of a supervisor. Record the date & time. Ask to speak to the supervisor. Inform the supervisor you're telling them to remove you from their list. Failure to do so is punishable by a $500 fine. I had to go this route to get a long-distance company to stop calling me. I've not received a call from them in more than a year. You can also record inbound calls (depending on your state) without letting them know you're doing so. You can use this as evidence that you informed them not to call you again.

      I may have to go this route with another company and actually sue in small claims court to get the $ if they call again.

      2) Privacy manager. We've got this package from our carrier (AT&T?) that blocks calls from phonebanks that don't publish their number to callerid. They get a VRU-type prompt that asks for their passcode or for them to state their name. Enter a passcode & my phone rings. Say your name & the system calls me. I have the option of letting you talk to me, dumping you to callnotes or hanging up on you.

      3) Anonymous call blocker. 'Nuff said.

      --
      Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
    3. Re:It sucks by technomom · · Score: 1

      >>Companies you have "done business with" (ie you bought something from them)

      This is the one I see as a huge loophole. You will soon see this coming to your snailmail or email inbox...

      "Get a cellphone/PDA/Gameboy/other shiny toy for only 1 cent!"

      Thank you very much, you're now on our call list!

      JoAnn

    4. Re:It sucks by Atlantix · · Score: 4, Informative

      The original exemptions are due to the FTC not having control over airlines, banks, and phone companies. Those industries are regulated by the FCC. If you read this article at CNN: http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/06/27/do.not.c all.ap/index.html, you'll find the following quote:

      "The FCC voted 5-0 Thursday to add its authority to the do-not-call list and to plug holes in its protections. The registry will now also block telemarketers from industries whose calls the FCC regulates, including airlines, banks and telephone companies."

      So by the time it goes active (october 1) this thing WILL be useful.

      --Atlantix

    5. Re:It sucks by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      However, let's not forget that is a list of numbers whose owners have expressed a desire not to receive calls. It would be somewhat stupid for a telemarketer to use it as a base list of call numbers. Something like taking your local LUG's directory as a base to visit offering Windows licenses.

    6. Re:It sucks by giminy · · Score: 1

      As for point 1, I thought that was contrary to the point of the do no call list? The reason this whole thing exists is because it's a pain in the arse to tell people off, write down names and file them so you can find them later. Maybe I'm just lazy and hate dealing with people.

      Interesting though, does the callee get the $500 fine or does the state? Seems less worth it if the state gets it. I'd always entertained the idea of doing this, but the rewards hardly seem worth the trouble of going to court.

      The Privacy Manager thing sounds pretty cool, though. I'll have to see if Verizon does that (anybody know?). Can you set the prompt? One thing I've noticed about annoying telemarketers is that their phone bank doesn't connect with a real person until a certain amount of noise comes from the receiving end. Try it sometime...just answer your phone with "hello" and sit and wait. Usually telemarketing machines disconnect after a few seconds (you usually have to say "hello.....hello? Anybody there" before they pick up). Setting the prompt to something really short would be a funny way to deal with it too.

      Ohwell, good ideas. Thanks for the tips.

      --
      The Right Reverend K. Reid Wightman,
    7. Re:It sucks by MImeKillEr · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the point is to do away with option 1. However, the $500 is paid to you by them. I'm not sure of the law, I believe its federal. I'd google for it, but I'm in the middle of writing some Rational Robot scripts..

      Not sure about setting the prompt. I belive all it says is something like along the lines of your not publishing your number and that in order to speak to the party you've dialed enter your passcode or wait and say your name. It's picked up part of autodialers going through their scripts (last half of 'please wait while we connect you' and then someone saying 'hello? hello?') & disconnects from the announcement recording & then calls us. Once we hear the script, we hit 2 (I believe) to disconnect. The dialer sees that the number was answered, but no one ever gets through.

      You set up passcodes (10 digit) in order for them to get through. The passcode shows on caller ID & says 'Passcode' where the name would be. So, as long as you know the passcode you can figure out who it is.

      And its not AT&T, its SWBell : https://www05.sbc.com/privacy-manager-facts.html

      --
      Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
    8. Re:It sucks by ilsie · · Score: 1

      Overseas Telemarketers are covered under this law.

      Q: Are telemarketing calls from overseas covered?

      A: Yes. Any telemarketers calling U.S. consumers are covered, regardless of where they are calling from. If a company within the U.S. solicits sales through an overseas professional telemarketer, that U.S. company is liable for any violations by the telemarketer. The FTC can initiate enforcement actions against such companies.

    9. Re:It sucks by Laika · · Score: 1

      They way I understand this gap betwixt sign-up/enforcement is that there is always a 3 month processing/vetting period for ALL registrations. If you look futher down, it says that if you register Oct 1. or later, expect to see a 3 month delay. So... there's always the three month wait whilst they decode your communique. It looks as though most everyone signing up thinks they are in queue for a free lottery ticket :) Also, CID is not always available to the consumer, but ANI is ALWAYS available via the Telco as evidence in criminal investigations.

  76. Another industry oursourced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This will pretty much guarantee that the US telemarketing industry will be outsourced overseas. Damn, now I have to compete with those lizards for fry cook positions at McDonalds, the only jobs left in the US.

    1. Re:Another industry oursourced by danny256 · · Score: 1

      This will pretty much guarantee that the US telemarketing industry will be outsourced overseas.

      I think that the fact that long distance calls cost a lot of money would prevent this from happening.

  77. Yes... by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

    ..but we have telemarketing too :'(.

  78. 90 DAYS.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh yeah, i'll just add the 50th post to mention that theres a 3 month latency to getting your number blocked. I may repost this info again just for the sake of staying consistent with this thread.

  79. I have a feeling... by flacco · · Score: 1

    ...that server is going to vaporize into plasma cloud before the day is out.

    --
    pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    1. Re:I have a feeling... by hether · · Score: 1

      It already has. I'm getting host not available errors. I guess that's what you get when you advertise something like this across the country and then post a link on slashdot. This really shows just how many people are tired of being called.

      --

      Most people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do.
  80. Figgers... by sofar · · Score: 1, Funny

    www.netcraft.com:

    The site donotcall.gov is running Microsoft-IIS/5.0 on unknown.

    nuff sed!

    1. Re:Figgers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The site donotcall.gov is running Microsoft-IIS/5.0 on unknown.
      Damn, that WINE is slow...
  81. What disadvantage? by aksansai · · Score: 1

    What exactly is the disadvantage that land-lines (which I would guess that 95% of the populace has ready-access to) would become less polluted with unsolicited phone calls? You mean that I will actually not be bothered every single time my cordless phone rings at me? You mean that when phone service becomes more popular thus stifling the rate-hikes necessary to sustain a telephone network causing prices to stabilize or gasp! drop a wee bit is a disadvantage?

    Sheesh! I feel I need a reality check!

    I can see that caller-ID would lose its shine for many customers. Of all the phone calls I receive (currently) about 7 out of 10 are unwanted calls. Out of those seven, they are either "out of area" calls or 1-800 numbers. I'll answer about three of those just to ask them to remove my number from their list.

    --
    Ayup
    1. Re:What disadvantage? by Theovon · · Score: 1
      You completely miss my point.

      All of the things you mention are advantages to the consumer. The disadvantage is that the do-not-call list will help the PHONE COMPANIES. (By making consumers avoid them less)

      I do not want to help phone companies!

  82. Equivalent service in the UK by floydigus · · Score: 2, Informative

    The equivalent in the UK is the telephone preference service.
    You can sign up here. Use links from this page to set yourself up on the mailing preference service (door spam) the faxing preference service (fax spam) and email preference service (spam spam spam spam, spam spam spam spam).

    --

    All things in moderation; including moderation

    1. Re:Equivalent service in the UK by dreamquick · · Score: 1

      The actual sites are...

      http://www.tpsonline.org.uk/
      http://www.fpsonli ne.org.uk/
      http://www.mpsonline.org.uk/
      http://w ww.emps.org/

      FWIW fax spam to consumers is already illegal under the same legislation which created these opt-out lists in 1995.

      In all honesty the eMPS isn't worth a damn since most junk emails come from people who don't have to/wont follow best practice.

      - Tony

    2. Re:Equivalent service in the UK by floydigus · · Score: 1

      Agreed on the eMPS. The tps, however r0xx0rs.

      --

      All things in moderation; including moderation

  83. already on it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All half-decent looking women already have me on their do-not-call-back list.

  84. How long until telemarketing shops go overseas? by DerProfi · · Score: 0

    2 of the last 3 tech support calls I've placed (ReplayTV and Dell) have been routed overseas to India, which makes me wonder... Is there any good reason why telemarketing shops wouldn't begin setting themselves up the same way? IANAL, but as long as they actually called internationally rather than routing through a U.S. phone number, it sounds like an easy way to skirt these new U.S. regulations.

    --

    3000+ comments meta-modded. 0 mod points awarded.
    Lesson for other meta-suckers: Don't believe the hype!
  85. Telemarketing will never die. by $criptah · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The do-not-call list is a nice idea, but it is going to be worthless due to some exceptions. For example, any company that can affiliate itself with a political or a charity organization is automatically allowed to contact you. That brings me to a question: why does the law allow for political and charity organizations to do telemarketing on the first place? If I want to donate money to a charity, I will do so without them telling me. If I want to support a politician and/or a party, I will do so upon my free will. Also, telemarketing companies will not give up their business easily; I suspect that we are going to face more spam in our inboxes and flyers in our mail. Moreover, by registering our numbers with the government we provide it with a list of valid phone numbers: expect more political soliciting. Unless there is a way to stop all unwated phone calls related to telemarketing/charity/politics people will not win.

  86. I'm going to miss them when they're gone... by Angerson · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's kind of sad that they'll be going away, really. Oh how I'll miss that ever-present 10 second pause before they say hello. Or how they talk to my answering machine for a few minutes before they realize no one is there (with the general interest in telemarketing I could understand the confusion). And of course who can overlook the sheer amount of interesting stories they can provide a person.

    For example like the time I answered the phone only to find a telemarketer in the midst of conversation with her "girlfrient" Brandy in the next cubicle. This one didn't even bother to say hello, just kept on talking. At least she was kind enough to eventually tell me to, "Hold on minute, will you?" Or perhaps the one time I kindly the told the telemarketer that I wasn't interested in their offer and he promptly told me to screw off in his own expletive-ridden way. My favorite, however, was the time I told one I was actually interested in their product just for kicks.

    Sales Drone: "Excuse me, sir? Did you say you were interested?"

    Me: "Yeah, that's right."

    Sales Drone: "No one is ever interested, sir. I'm not even sure how to make a sale."

    (Sets phone down and yells to his associates)

    Sales Drone: "Anyone here ever make a sale before!?"

    (Short pause)

    Sales Drone: "I'm going to have to get you a manager. Can we call you back?"

    Seriously, will anyone miss these people?

  87. 800 number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    888-382-1222. Not sure if anyone has posted this below. I knew the number a couple days ago. Anyone else find it a little ironic that a telemarketing company is hosting the number?

  88. Slashdotted - Check out FAQ here: by LookSharp · · Score: 4, Informative

    I snagged a copy and emailed it on before it got posted to Slashdot:

    Tell Me More About the National Do Not Call Registry

    Q: Why would I register my phone number with the National Do Not Call Registry?

    A: The National Do Not Call Registry gives you an opportunity to limit the telemarketing calls you receive. On October 1, 2003, when the National Do Not Call Registry will be enforced, most telemarketers will be required to remove the numbers on the registry from their call lists.

    Q: Who manages the National Do Not Call Registry?

    A: The National Do Not Call Registry is managed by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the nation's consumer protection agency.

    Q: Why was the National Do Not Call Registry created?

    A: The registry was created to offer consumers a choice regarding telemarketing calls. The FTC's decision to create the National Do Not Call Registry was the culmination of a comprehensive, three year review of the Telemarketing Sales Rule, as well as the Commission's extensive experience enforcing the Rule over seven years. The FTC held numerous workshops, meetings and briefings to solicit feedback from interested parties and considered over 64,000 public comments, most of which favored creating the registry. You can review the entire record of the Rule review at www.ftc.gov/bcp/rulemaking/tsr/tsrrulemaking/index .htm.

    How Does Registration Work?

    Q: How soon after I register will I notice a reduction in calls?

    A: If you register by August 31, 2003, you will start receiving fewer telemarketing calls by October 1, 2003. If you register after September 1, 2003, telemarketers covered by the National Do Not Call Registry will have up to three months from the date you register to stop calling you.

    Q: I've already registered on my state's do not call list. Do I need to register on the National Do Not Call Registry?

    A: The answer depends on where you live. Most of the 26 states will that currently have active do not call lists will transfer numbers from their lists to the National Do Not Call Registry. A few will not. You can find out which states are transferring their do not call lists to the National Do Not Call Registry at www.ftc.gov/donotcall. If you live in a state that is transferring its do not call list to the national registry, you do not need to re-register. On the other hand, if you live in a state that has its own do not call list, but the state is not transferring numbers to the National Registry, then you need to register your own number on the National Registry. If you are uncertain whether you are on a state do not call list and wish to limit your telemarketing contacts, you can register with the National Do Not Call Registry.

    Q: When I register my phone number, how long until it shows up on the National Do Not Call Registry?

    A: After you register, your phone number will be available for telemarketers to remove it from their call lists by the next day. Telemarketers will have up to three months to get your phone number and remove it from their call lists.

    Q: How long does it take after I delete my phone number for it to be deleted from the National Do Not Call Registry?

    A: After you delete your phone number, it will be removed from the National Do Not Call Registry by the next day. But telemarketers have up to three months to access information about your deletion and add your number back to their call lists, if they choose to.

    Q: If I registered by phone, will I receive a confirmation?

    A: No, but you can verify that your number is on the registry online or by calling the registry's toll-free number, 1-888-382-1222; for TTY, call 1-866-290-4236.

    Q: I received a phone call from someone offering to put my name on the National Do Not Call Registry. Should I let them?

    A: No. The FTC will not allow private companies or other such third parties to "pre-register" consumers for the National Do Not Call Registry. Web sites

    1. Re:Slashdotted - Check out FAQ here: by EmailCurmudgeon · · Score: 1

      There is a PDF with other more informative FAQs : here

  89. Re:Messing with the telemarketers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My favourite technique I copied from Seinfeld...

    Me: Hello

    Them: Hi, I'm calling from annoyingSalesCompanyLtd and we're doing a survey in your blah blah...

    Me: Oh I'm sorry I'm busy right now. Give me your number and I'll give you a call back when it's more convenient

    Them: ar.. um we can't do that I'm afraid.

    Me: Oh, I guess you don't want people calling you up every hour of the night and day do you

    Them:__

    Me: Well neither do I. Goodbye.

    It's a classic and it works. Even if they do give you a number the onus is now on you to call them back and if they call you again (this has never happened) you can tell them in no uncertain terms that YOU were going to call THEM and they're very rude for ringing to hurry you along.

    I used to 1471 (UK ringback no) them (US *69 I believe) but they're mostly unlisted numbers now. But when I could get their number, I'd take note of it and give them a ring whenever I had something I wanted to sell.

    Any other techniques I could use. The more amusing the better.

  90. Re:Messing with the telemarketers by opti6600 · · Score: 1

    Leave it to us Americans to turn 69 into something that you can't joke about, jeez...

  91. Available by RabidChipmunk · · Score: 1


    Given that they are collecting this list purely for the sake of giving it out to telemarketers....

    --
    This is not a political statement. This is not legal advice. It's a frick'n Slasdot post. However: I'm Running For
  92. State Lists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our state has fewer exemptions than the federal list and our state AG has assured us that if we remain listed on the state list and don't use the federal list, we should continue to receive a smaller number of calls. Has anyone else heard of this?

  93. Dumb Question by JSkills · · Score: 1
    Why don't we all just START OUT on the Do-Not-Call-List to begin with?

    BTW: I recently moved and opted to get an unlisted phone number. It's great - no calls from solicitor's (yet).

    1. Re:Dumb Question by mgs1000 · · Score: 1

      A better idea: Let's have a Do-Call-List, and telemarketers can only call you if you opted-in.

    2. Re:Dumb Question by JDBrechtel · · Score: 1

      Heh, that's what he was implying.

    3. Re:Dumb Question by shams42 · · Score: 1

      I know that's been tried before, but lobbyists from the DMA and other organizations lobbied like hell, because this would have essentially killed their industry.

      Not that this would be a bad thing though.

  94. Big deal... by Iamthefallen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You do realize that any product you buy will now have a clause stating that by buying or registering the product you also sign up to receive special offers from them, their affiliates and whomever else they sell your information to? Explicit permission can be given in many ways, but few of them are actually explicit.

    --
    Wax-Museum Fire Results In Hundreds Of New Danny DeVito Statues
  95. government site slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmm. Won't they be angry?

  96. Re:National? by syntap · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be easier for your to filter in whatever country you are interested in?

  97. Damn you Slashdot! by indros13 · · Score: 2, Funny
    I had just finished reading the story in my local paper online and was proceeding to go to the site so I could get on the list...

    ...That's funny, the site isn't working, just like when Slashdo...

    ...of course! It's the top story on Slashdot. I guess I'll just have to sign up lat...*ring*

    Damn!

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  98. move to canada ... by eyefloater · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... won't the telemarketing companies simply be able to move across the border and set up shop there? toronto's already a hotbed for telemarketing boiler rooms calling across canada and the states, this just might make things worse here.

    1. Re:move to canada ... by tordia · · Score: 1
      Yep. I've already had a telemarketing call from a 905 area code, which is apparently for the Greater Toronto area.

      I got that call on the 23rd, and I knew immediately why they were calling from Canada.

      --

      Frogs are primitive animals - so the occasional extra toe is not that unusual. But this is very unusual.

    2. Re:move to canada ... by DirkDaring · · Score: 1

      Q: Are telemarketing calls from overseas covered?

      A: Yes. Any telemarketers calling U.S. consumers are covered, regardless of where they are calling from. If a company within the U.S. solicits sales through an overseas professional telemarketer, that U.S. company is liable for any violations by the telemarketer. The FTC can initiate enforcement actions against such companies.

    3. Re:move to canada ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus, of course, we could just invade if it gets to be too much of a problem.

  99. Re:Call registry by ozbon · · Score: 1

    Yup, I read it. It's a thing called Irony. I read slahdot a lot, and it's fine with me.

    --
    I say we take off and nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...
  100. What benefit does it have over state NC list? by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If I'm already on the Missouri list and it's been nearly 100% successful, why would I need to be on the national list? Missouri isn't sharing it's data according to the site and I'm kind of glad because that would probably lead to "charities" from out of state calling me.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  101. National "The Document Contains no Data" list by siskbc · · Score: 3, Funny
    They are supposed to be releasing a phone number to call in after a week (or few).

    Yeah, but that's even worse! Then they'll have a *phone number* to link to my ph....oh. Nevermind.

    Hey, is it just me or did we manage to /. the registration site? Their server seems to be curled up fetal on the bottom of the rack right now. Good job guys.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    1. Re:National "The Document Contains no Data" list by mink · · Score: 2, Informative

      Bush was on the radio saying over 100 people per second are registering.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
    2. Re:National "The Document Contains no Data" list by blair1q · · Score: 2, Informative

      This time it wasn't just /. it was also the AP.

      So yes, the registry is massively hosed right now.

      They are supposed to send out a pair of emails "within a few minutes" to be used to confirm the registration, but I haven't seen any.

      This is why they should have had an "opt-in" registry instead. The user volume would have been 30 per day instead of 30 million.

    3. Re:National "The Document Contains no Data" list by __aaklbk2114 · · Score: 1

      The registration site is running ASP.Net...

      Maybe that's why :)

  102. More Spam! by cyphergirl · · Score: 1

    I caught this on Good Morning America this morning. They interviewed the heads of some telemarketing companies about the registry. One guy actually said that they would have no problems selling stuff, because they would just start sending more email.

    DOH!

    --
    --Insert catchy .sig line here--
    1. Re:More Spam! by DirkDaring · · Score: 1

      What is he going to do when the Do Not Email registry begins?

    2. Re:More Spam! by cyphergirl · · Score: 1

      Dunno... buy LOTS of stamps? :)

      --
      --Insert catchy .sig line here--
  103. Resist temptation to flood the list, please by unfortunateson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I just had another thought.

    Some enterprising young /.er is probably thinking right now that it's less than ten billion total phone numbers (by the time you screen out non-US area codes, toll-free and service numbers it's probably on the order of 6 or 7 billion), a bunch of random domains and e-mails can be created to add EVERY SINGLE phone number to the list, and even automate the e-mail reply with a procmail line. (Actually, since business phone numbers aren't covered by the DNC list, it's probably less than 3 billion possible numbers.)

    Don't.

    No, really.

    If the registry is a complete set of the US phone system, some telemarketer will sue claiming that there's false data in there, and that the majority of the people on the list never opted out.

    They'll have to scrap the whole thing, and start over again with an even-more-invasive registration procedure.

    --
    Design for Use, not Construction!
    1. Re:Resist temptation to flood the list, please by alexjohns · · Score: 1
      Actually, since business phone numbers aren't covered by the DNC list, it's probably less than 3 billion possible numbers
      Interesting that you thought about this problem from the viewpoint of possible phone numbers. If you'd thought about it from the other angle, i.e. how many probable phone numbers, you might have come closer to the actual number.

      There's a little less than 300 million people in the US. This works out to a little more than 100 million households. Let's assume each of those households has a phone. (Actual number I've seen is about 97% penetration.) That's about 100 million phone numbers. Plus a fudge factor, which includes second lines (not business lines, that's separate) such as a separate phone for the kid(s) and cell phones. That fudge factor is (I would guess) anywhere from 0.01 to 1.0.

      Before cell phones I would have put it at 0.1. Nowadays, I would venture to guess it's about 0.3 or 0.4 (and climbing, I'm sure). So maybe 135 million personal phone numbers in use. I'm sure it's not dead on, but I wouldn't think it's too far off.

      Do I get the job, Mr. Microsoft tough-questions-guy?

    2. Re:Resist temptation to flood the list, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sooooo, how do you tell the difference between a business number and personal number and an unused number? You can't tell by looking at it, which makes automating this a less than trivial task I would think...

    3. Re:Resist temptation to flood the list, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sorry, I meant it's NOT a trivial task.... time to go home now.

    4. Re:Resist temptation to flood the list, please by demigod · · Score: 1

      Now why wouldn't the telemarketer just remove all the numbers they wanted to call, then request a copy of the list and call them? Then they can say "see these weren't on the list you gave us".

      --
      "The last thing I want to do is deal with a bunch of people who want something."
      Major Major
  104. Monkeys! by Marc2k · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sweet, I was wondering what to do with my 1 Billion monkeys and computers. They really haven't produced anything of worth lately, "Blurst of times"? what the shit is that.

    --
    --- What
    1. Re:Monkeys! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, my billion monkeys and computers are pretty useless too. They keep churning out Shakespear manuscripts. What am I supposed to do with those?

  105. How long it will take before the loopholes get big by technomom · · Score: 1

    The loopholes are just too huge here.

    Most of the phone spam I get is from my long distance phone company anyway bugging me to subscribe to their local service. I subscribe to their long distance services, thus rendering them exempt. Kind of the ultimate catch-22 isn't it?

    I also hate that charities and politicians are exempt. The local blood bank has to be our second biggest abuser. Again, the law doesn't help here.

    I'll stick with the tried and true practice of letting the answering machine pick up any phone call that comes up "Out of Area" on my caller id.

    JoAnn

  106. Would you like to switch long distance... by cybercuzco · · Score: 1

    Apparantly the FTC has hired AT&T to run the call center that takes all the national do not call list phone calls. Talk about the fox gaurding the henhouse, are they going to ask if i want to swtich from MCI when I call to ask my number be removed from the list? (Hint: the answer is no, I dont want to switch)

    --

  107. Is the Do-Not-Call list privy to abuse? by Ride-My-Rocket · · Score: 1

    My greatest concern here is that, if I submit my number to the Do-Not-Call list, a telemarketer who might otherwise not know my phone number will be able to harvest my phone number. This this fear unfounded, or is it addressed by the Do-Not-Call list policy?

    1. Re:Is the Do-Not-Call list privy to abuse? by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1
      Unfounded.

      The phone company sells lists of phone numbers! The telespammers can guess your number, and usually use "war dialer" machines that start at one end of 555-0000 and work through to 555-9999 then do 556-0000 .... etc. I can sometimes hear them working their way thourgh the office, extension by extension.

  108. Encouragement by mobileskimo · · Score: 1, Interesting

    As many have pointed out, telemarketing works. The problem isn't that people buy this crap. Humanity is what it is. We can not abandon the the small tail of the bell curve for the sake of those that fit under 2 deviations. As much as I would love to identify stupid people and exile them to a remote island. We all become elitist going in that direction. It's that we push this crap and encourage it in our "culture". Well... let's be honest. It is our culture. And therein lies our problem and thus the justification for forces to discourage telemarketing.

    Telemarketers prey on the lowest common denominator of human behavior. Encouraging its widespread use acclimates larger percentages of our population as well as impressionable people.

    Ex: I couldn't care less about them and their personal purchasing habits and what stupid things they choose to spend their money on (this also goes for personalities that gravitate toward telemarketing practices and what they sell). Only problem is I have to live next door to these idiots. Had I children, so would they. I fear the idea that my kids would would even be in the same country as their kids and start learning their habits just from even a casual observance (its far more than that with television. *sigh*). Obviously only a small example of the impacts. But you get the picture. To put it more simply...

    There's overflow and trickle down from anything that's this prevalent in our society as telemarketing. And all the things your mind conjures up when you think of the word.

    Isn't that scarey? You still want to continue saying that it's not your problem as long as you don't have to deal with it because you have practices and behaviors that limit your exposure? I get NO junk mail. My email address is a small mom/pop shop ISP unknown to any spammers. I have no land-line. My cell phone is older than the practice of telemarketing, doesn't even have block CallerID or Unlisted. I don't get bothered. But this problem and the direction it is taking in general still concerns me.

    --
    "Last one in is a rotten goblin!" - Kepp
  109. Re:Wrong by bluethundr · · Score: 2, Funny

    bgates@microsoft.com

    That's not his email address. sorry. ;)


    That's okay. I just used steve@apple.com instead!

    --
    Quod scripsi, scripsi.
  110. September Rush by RabidChipmunk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Everyone is talking about the exemptions. No-one is talking about the delay.

    If you sign up before August 1st, telemarketers have to stop calling you in October. This suggests that telemarketers should/will use the list as a "call now" list during September. Similarly, if you sign up after Aug 1, they have three months to call you as many times as posible.

    Yes there has to be some delay, but three months?

    I'm not saying they will all do this, but I bet some will.

    --
    This is not a political statement. This is not legal advice. It's a frick'n Slasdot post. However: I'm Running For
    1. Re:September Rush by DirkDaring · · Score: 1

      "This suggests that telemarketers should/will use the list as a "call now" list during September."

      They can't, read the rules.

    2. Re:September Rush by RabidChipmunk · · Score: 1
      They can't, read the rules.


      Okay; I give up. I don't see where it says that they can't do that.

      The rules for consumers say they have to stop after three months.

      http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/tmarkg/donot ca ll.htm

      The rules for business say they have to scrub at least every 90 days, but not which numbers. If they poll the database more often they get a period of time in which to call. If they poll everyday, they know exactly what day is the last day they can call you.

      http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/buspubs/call in g.htm

      Now, I'm not suggesting they aren't violeting the intent of the rule, but they would not be violating the rules as described on the website.
      --
      This is not a political statement. This is not legal advice. It's a frick'n Slasdot post. However: I'm Running For
  111. A National DO NOT /. list by adzoox · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I bet there are some websites that wish there was such a thing as a national do not /. list. I have seen some people post really nasty messages after a site was linked by /. staff. Such as this one. For about a week this website had a "F*** You /." message on it.

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
  112. You're GIVING your number to exempt orgs. by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Think about this for a second, folks. You're helping the government compile a list that anyone but 'protected telemarketers' can call. The regular telemarketers have to grab the list, and weed the numbers out of their databases.

    Now think about this. The government is supplying a list of telephone numbers. There exists 'protected telemarketers'. If you were a protected telemarketer, what would you do?

    You got it. Download the list, and you've got yourself a database of active telephone nubmers to start calling. All for free. "Thanks for giving us your number, chump. Now me and my buddies can call all we want."

    1. Re:You're GIVING your number to exempt orgs. by Oswald · · Score: 1
      Uh, yeah, that's gonna hurt--up until now they've had a lot of trouble finding me.

      Just think of every call from a politician or non-profit as an opportunity to score an $11,000 hit if they ignore your request and call again. In fact, I think I'll buy a little log book for each phone so I can keep track of who I've told to piss off.

      Of course, I'm showing my naivete here--as if this shit is ever going to be enforced. Oh, well.

    2. Re:You're GIVING your number to exempt orgs. by FurryFeet · · Score: 2, Funny

      They already have your number. This is not like email harvesting.
      And they'd have to be particularly dense to use that strategy. "Let's see, here is a list of people who have specifically and in no uncertain terms stated that they do not like to be called by telemarketers. Let me call them and try to sell them something".
      Really, like selling Windows licenses at a Linuxfest. Good luck.

    3. Re:You're GIVING your number to exempt orgs. by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 1

      > Uh, yeah, that's gonna hurt--up until now
      > they've had a lot of trouble finding me.

      That's the case I'm in. I've got an unlisted number, and I guard who I give it to... especially companies. If I put my telephone number on a do-not-call registry, I'm publishing it out and making it ripe for harvest. If I don't put it on the registry, I'm still safe, for a time.

      Kind of a sucky catch-22. In order to not be telemarketed to, I can't put myself on the no-telemarketing list.

    4. Re:You're GIVING your number to exempt orgs. by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 1

      You've got to think like a telemarketer.

      "Oh, these people said they didn't want to be bothered with commercial telemarketing. I completely understand. Wow! I bet they'd love to hear about our non-profit organization and help us. They didn't say anything about not wanting calls from us, and I bet they'll actually thank us for raising the awareness of our organization!"

    5. Re:You're GIVING your number to exempt orgs. by sgt_getraer · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's a little more complex than that. What I found curious is that in the FAQ, even though a company may be exempt (like a long distance company), they cannot contract out the work. So if AT&T is calling you direct it's a-ok, but if they outsource it to Joe's Sweat Shop Call Center that can be dinged for the fine.

      From my experience working for a satanic market research firm, almost no-one does their own calling. Looks like it has the potential to wipe out quite a few calls and force telemarketing to be more expensive to the exempt companies. These are both good things.

    6. Re:You're GIVING your number to exempt orgs. by phriedom · · Score: 2, Informative

      Okay, Mr. Paranoid, here's a data point then: I am on a state no call list, and have been for 5 or 6 years now. I get called 3 or 4 times a year by two charities who pick up donations curbside because I have told them "You can call me next time you have a truck in the neighborhood." I get maybe one charity cold-call per year, and they don't call back when I tell them I'm not interested. Charities don't get a high-enough success rate on cold-calling to make it pay, so they just don't do it much. I get probably one survey call per month, or less. My wife gets several automated phone messages from politicians in the 3 or 4 days before each election, so a couple calls per night for about one week worth out of 104. I'm registered Green, so I don't get political party phone calls.

      Bottom Line: IT WORKS and it is cheaper than commercial solutions. You're not giving them any information they don't already have. There is no downside.

      --
      Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
    7. Re:You're GIVING your number to exempt orgs. by gillbates · · Score: 1
      You're GIVING your number to exempt orgs.

      And this is somehow different from the phone company selling them my phone number?

      Or perhaps using an autodailer to call me anyway?

      It's not like telemarketers need a list of numbers to start calling - just about any 7 digit number will connect to someone (or someone's modem).

      Granted, some sleazy telemarketers may use this list - but they wouldn't do it for long, because quite frankly, their call/sales ratio wouldn't be too high calling folks on a DNC list.

      --
      The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
    8. Re:You're GIVING your number to exempt orgs. by |/|/||| · · Score: 1

      I don't know that they would want to do that.

      First of all, they're going to have a list of the people who are the least likely to respond to telemarketing calls, which means every call is very likely to be a waste of money for the caller.

      Secondly, most people who proactively sign up for the "do not call list" are going to be extremely pissed at *anyone* who calls them with a telephone solicitation. Exemptions be damned. Don't ever call me again - no, I don't care what kind of loophole you have. I'll never, ever do business with/make a contribution to your business/organization. Ever. You are now on *my* list.

      [ranting]
      You want what? You want me to donate to your program/institution that should be funded by my government? You want me to take up the slack because schools/fire departments/whatever aren't getting enough funding? Yeah, like I'm going to perpetuate the problem.
      [/ranting]

      Er, sorry about the ranting.

      --
      [javac] 100 errors
    9. Re:You're GIVING your number to exempt orgs. by nettdata · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it's not like it's hard for them to figure out your phone number... they know the exchanges for a particular region, and they start at xxx-0001, xxx-0002, etc.

      They don't care that it's unlisted, and they have no desire (generally) to link the number to you as an individual.

      Sure, some telemarketing scum like to try to personalize the "hello" message by asking for a particular person, but they're the exception rather than the rule, and they only do that if the information is there.

      The call is still made, regardless.

      --



      $0.02 (CDN)
    10. Re:You're GIVING your number to exempt orgs. by prockcore · · Score: 1

      You're helping the government compile a list that anyone but 'protected telemarketers' can call.

      And who are they going to ask for when I answer the phone? They don't know my name.

    11. Re:You're GIVING your number to exempt orgs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually...It looks like you are giving it to anyone who wants to sniff the network...because the registration page is not using SSL...So your phone number and email address are going out in plain text.

      Nice!

    12. Re:You're GIVING your number to exempt orgs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really. Charitable/political organizations, unlike sales-driven organizations, are generally less intrusive. They're asking for hand-outs, after all. Why would they waste their limited resources calling people who very clearly don't want to be bothered?

    13. Re:You're GIVING your number to exempt orgs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe my memory is going (well it is, but...), but I didn't think the telemarketers got the list of phone numbers. I thought they had to provide a list of #s to the gov, and the gov cuts the do-not-call out. So they never get an actual copy of do-not-call.

      Not that it matters all that much, as other people here have observed. Laingsburg, MI is 517-651-xxxx with maybe 3000 numbers in use out of 10,000. I'm sure they just call them all...

    14. Re:You're GIVING your number to exempt orgs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell that to the local Sheriff's office that calls. It almost seems threatening.

    15. Re:You're GIVING your number to exempt orgs. by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Charities that cold-call do make it pay, by sticking to the federally mandated minimum of 5% effective delivery of the funds collected to the putative recipients.

      I'll say that again: 5%.

      The other 95% is gravy for the "charity's" employees.

  113. There's a solution to this... by artemis67 · · Score: 0

    It's called HOTMAIL.

  114. Slashdot'ed or Designed to Fail by DPL · · Score: 1

    A little conspiracy theory if I may. My understanding is AT&T got the contract to build the site. According to NetCraft (http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph/?host=donotca ll.gov), it runs IIS. One of the largest telemarketers and the inventors of Unix chose IIS? I smell a setup!

    Tune in later for more conspiracies.

  115. OK, who ISN'T going to register? by zrk · · Score: 1

    Aside from those people who are concerned with the issue of the not-for-profit orgs getting your number?

    1. Re:OK, who ISN'T going to register? by night_flyer · · Score: 1

      Im not, my answering machine works just fine...

      --


      Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
      Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
  116. Outsourcing to circumvent the database? by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 1

    So, I'm wondering. If a company outsources to a non-domestic telemarketing firm, do they have to follow the American no-call database?

  117. How many people will submit themselves? by chia_monkey · · Score: 1

    I wonder how many people will actually DO THIS. Some people actually ENJOY getting "good deals" and such. Maybe it's the lonely housewives that enjoy the calls too. Who knows.

    Then you've also got the people who don't even know about it. I've been tracking the "Do Not Call" list (and the related "Do Not Spam" list they've been talking about) for quite a while. In my experience, it's only been a small percentage of the population that actually knows about this. And then you have to actually CALL someone (or go to the site). Let's face it...people are lazy and they won't "have time" to do it. And there's my social commentary for the day.

    --

    "He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lampposts...for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang
  118. Does not start until October 1! by artemis67 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Until October 1, telemarketers are free to call without checking the "do not call" list.

    You know that these marketing companies are going to be pressuring their clients to jump on their service before the deadline, to get the most bang. Expect a deluge of sales calls in September.

  119. Since the site is down.. by nolife · · Score: 1

    Since the FTC site is down, The Direct Marketing Association is offering a service that will take down your name, number, social security number, address, number of people living in your household, your annual income, and email address and will forward it on to the FTC database for you. They are offering this service for a limited time only for the low low price of $19.99 or two easy payments of $15.99.

    --
    Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  120. .NET can't handle slashdot effect by estoll · · Score: 1, Troll

    If you notice, their web site is running on Microsoft.NET, which cannot handle the slashdot effect very well... Of course, most servers can't but I thought I would make note of it.

    --
    http://www.askthevoid.com
    1. Re:.NET can't handle slashdot effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great note genius, but this isn't the slashdot effect. Can you spread any more FUD?

      This site has been on almost every major news and local news show last night and this morning. Slashdot doesn't even come close when you look at the traffic that those deliver.

    2. Re:.NET can't handle slashdot effect by xTMFWahoo · · Score: 1

      There is actually a link on the MSN homepage- I'd go ahead and guess that MSN get's more hits than /.

      --
      "Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it." Mark Twain.
  121. Or they already have it... by aksansai · · Score: 1

    What makes you think exempt organizations do not have my phone number already? The moment you sign up for your phone service, open a bank account, or anything that requires a phone number for contact - your phone number has been given out.

    It's like ... well ... the Klez virus :) once your phone hits a list, it gets incorporated into the hive list. It's replicates and replicates until just about anyone who wants your phone number can have it.

    I get plenty of phone calls from telemarketers and charity organizations. I cannot assume that the number of calls from charity organizations (not-for-profit) is going to go up drastically considering the already astounding number of calls I get right now.

    I will however, enjoy cutting out the calls from companies trying to help me get out of debt, put vinyl siding on my brick house, or the other annoyances that the list will theoretically help to reduce.

    --
    Ayup
  122. So what's to stop by earthforce_1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Offshore telemarketers and spammers from mining the do not call database? These people are scum anyways, and as long as they are not operating within the US, it seems to me that the US government has just handed them a bonafide list of valid phone and email addresses.

    --
    My rights don't need management.
    1. Re:So what's to stop by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1

      The email addresses are junked as soon as you confirm. Thye ALREADY have the numbers.

    2. Re:So what's to stop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      SCO sued me, and all I got was this lousy T-Shirt

      Shouldn't it read "SCO sued me, and all THEY got was this lousy T-Shirt?"

      -moitz-

    3. Re:So what's to stop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but just think how much more fun saying "Can you hold on for a minute", then putting the phone down and walking away will be when the caller is paying long distance fees!

  123. ARTIFICIAL employment? by Andorion · · Score: 1

    If the telemarketers keep calling, obviously they're making money with the tactic - why is employing someone to make money for your company "artificial" if they're a telemarketer? Don't assume everyone reacts the same way to a telemarketer call... I've seen people stop and chat with those crazy religious folks on street corners.

    ~Berj

  124. A script that is theoretically possible ;-) by eludom · · Score: 2, Informative

    Theoretically, one could write a script that:

    foreach $phonenumber (range of numbers)
    create email alias for $phone number
    sign up $phonenumber with donotcall.gov
    reply to confirmation email via HTTP
    end

    then fire it off for your favorite range of
    phone numbers (your local prefix, a random
    prefix). You could vary the timings, maybe
    add calls to reverse white pages to get the
    names right...randomize where you
    sign up the email addresses, etc.

    Note that I'm just pointing out what is
    *theoretically* possible...not advocating
    that anyone actualy commit fraud to reduce
    junk calls.

    ---eludom

    1. Re:A script that is theoretically possible ;-) by eludom · · Score: 1

      And as a further exercise, one could monitor
      the reciept of spam at the single-use email
      addresses given to donotcall.gov to see how
      long until that list finds it's way into
      the hands of spammers (it *will* happen).

      ---eludom

  125. Flip Side of this by OptimoosePrime · · Score: 1

    Somehow there has to be a way I can get the telemarketers to pay me to not be on this list....think Optimoose, think!

    --
    796F75617265616E65726400
  126. Next: National Do Not /. Registry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Next: National Do Not /. Registry

    Their site is feeling the /. effect.

  127. Sort of... by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

    Except that NOBODY wants telemarketers. There are some people that want Windows.

    Obviously that doesn't matter any more than it doesn't matter that nobody wants spammers. They still do their thing because if they can just find ONE sucker in a million that will buy from them, they've hit the jackpot.

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    1. Re:Sort of... by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      All I'm saying is that getting this list is less efficient for telemarketers than using their current strategy. Therefore, it is not logical to assume they would do it.
      Back to the analogy. You are the Windows salesman, and you have the LUG directory. You also have the white pages. Which would you use?

  128. Access to the list? by TCQuad · · Score: 1

    So, basically, they've created this huge database of verified phone numbers which they're distributing to non-exempt businesses (which, considering the number of exemptions, means 'both of them').

    Is this list readily accessible to anyone (say, politicians) who want to phone-spam their constituents? What about corporations that have exempt and non-exempt segments? Couldn't they apply for the list for their non-exempt businesses and give it to their exempt one? Will this really eliminate telemarketers, or increase the number exponentially?

  129. Dam it where is Canada's list by VEGETA_GT · · Score: 1

    Well like normal, Canada well be the last place to get a list of this type. Knowing our luck, all the telemarketers well move here formthe states. And instead of 2 calls at dinner, I well get 5.

  130. seems kinda slow.. by calethix · · Score: 1

    maybe they should start a National Do Not Slashdot Registry

  131. MOD PARENT UP by giminy · · Score: 1

    Wow! That's f'ing awesome news! Thanks for the post.

    --
    The Right Reverend K. Reid Wightman,
  132. It only took, what, 100 years to get this far? by Ewann · · Score: 1
    It just dawned on me that we've had telephone service for something like 100 years now, right?

    How long until they get around to doing this for email? Another 80-90 years?

  133. Weak registry by Pionar · · Score: 2, Informative

    I would recommend that anyone in Indiana just keep their number on the state's registry. Not only is that the recommendation of AG Steve Carter, but also of everyone I've talked to that is familiar with the federal legislation.

    A state lawmaker friend of mine has told me that while Indiana's registry exempts only charities, newspapers, insurance agents, and realtors (and even he is suspicious about the last three - strong lobby?), the federal list exempts many groups, including long-distance phone companies, airlines, and insurance agencies.

    In other words, the FTC did what it does best, appear to help consumers while pandering to corporate pressure.

  134. More bothersome than that by nocomment · · Score: 1

    It's using asp scripts *ack*...how secure is this thing? It's running IIS 5 according to netcraft. I'm leary of submitting private info to a windows box... :-/

    --
    /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
    /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
    1. Re:More bothersome than that by cscx · · Score: 1

      You've been listening to bigots too much. 76% of machines rooted in May were Linux boxes, while 15% Windows. I'd be more leary if they were running PHP....

  135. Is this News? by gooddope · · Score: 1

    There are two things that are going to happen from a DNC list. 1) The telemarketers are going to find some ingenious way to get around it, and the industry in general will remain status quo. 2) It will work and we will be blasted by some other annoying type of retail propoganda. We cannot win unless, as a whole, we stop allowing telemarketers to win. It is our fault that this is such a problem. Stop buying things from companies that use telemarketing as marketing. If the phone company calls you, tell them you want to be removed from their service. If your credit card company back solicits you, cancel the card ON THAT PHONE CALL. Telemarketing is a problem because it works.

  136. Popular by orfeo · · Score: 1

    Apparently word gets out quickly. Either Fox News or CNN (just channel flipping, wasn't sure which it was) is reporting that the registry is receiving 108 entries per second.

  137. Why are there ANY exempt businesses??? by openbear · · Score: 1
    This list (to me) seems useless. Did anyone notice the list of exempt businesses?

    The exempt business list includes:
    • long-distance phone companies
    • airlines
    • banks and credit unions
    • the business of insurance
    • political organizations
    • charities
    • telephone surveyors
    These are the EXACT people that I want to STOP CALLING ME with sales pitches!!!
    Again I ask the question, "Why are there ANY exempt businesses on this list???"

    What I really want is a law that forbids ALL telemarkerters from calling before noon on the weekends! When someone wakes me up at 8AM on a Saturday my chances of buying anything from them is ZERO!
    1. Re:Why are there ANY exempt businesses??? by DirkDaring · · Score: 1

      "The FCC voted 5-0 Thursday to add its authority to the do-not-call list and to plug holes in its protections. The registry will now also block telemarketers from industries whose calls the FCC regulates, including airlines, banks and telephone companies."

  138. Online Government by cacheMan · · Score: 1

    I have enjoyed all aspects of online government. Paying property taxes online, renewing registrations, and handling many aspects of multiple moves. Judging by the slow Do Not Call site, other people are taking advantage of this today.

    I wonder what voting turnout would be like if it were this easy. What other ways can I interact with my government online?

  139. Re:Yes...what a moron.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Telemarketing is a vital part of our economy, and generates billions and billions of dollars per year in real revenues which feed families.

    You are severely misinformed.

  140. Re:Needs email address to register... Hmm so what? by leeet · · Score: 1

    Do you really think they have *NO* way to find out that information?

    --
    -- Leeeter than leet
  141. Won't work... by raehl · · Score: 1

    If they make a donation and receive advertising time, the donation is no longer exempt. Donations have to be donations to be tax deductible - meaning you can't get anything (other than an item of token value, say, $8 or less) in return.

    1. Re:Won't work... by pulse2600 · · Score: 1

      meaning you can't get anything (other than an item of token value, say, $8 or less) in return.

      Thank you for reminding me of that - you are partially right...the rule is anything over the stated value of the item is tax deductible. So if you pay $1,000 for something that is valued at $500, the remaining $500 is tax deductible.

      Even if they can't claim it on their taxes, the concept of paying charities for advertising time on their phone calls still works.

  142. Will there be a flood of calls just before 10/1? by ewolfr · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else see the possibility of getting a ton of calls from telemarketers just before the cutoff date? I'm thinking of just unplugging my phone during the month of September just to be safe.

  143. kill the ringer by jhagler · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There has been much discussion about whether it's worth it to shut off your land line and go totally cellular or to just put up with the telemarketers. I think there's a relatively simple solution most people are overlooking...turn off your ringers.

    Giving up my land line wouldn't really be an option for me, my cablebox uses it, my home burglar/fire alarm uses it, TiVO uses it, and ADSL uses it so giving it up really isn't an option. A couple other posts mentioned services, pizza guys and UPS, who specifically require a land line for confirmation. So, I kept my phone line and only turn on the ringer when I are specifically expecting a call on that line, the rest of the time the ringer is off and anyone who wants to reach us uses our cell numbers.

    This way I have the best of both worlds, all my equipment that needs a phone line has one, we can talk to our family and friends whenever we want, and telemarketers get endless ringing that we never hear.

    --
    Never underestimate the power of human stupidity -RAH
  144. list is better by phriedom · · Score: 1

    My state list was $6 per year, rather than $4 per month, and it works. The Federal list is free.

    The bummer I have experience with the caller-ID system like the one you are using is that the digital phone system here at work does dot provide caller-ID data on outgoing calls, so my Mom, who uses caller-ID, doesn't answer the phone when I call her from work, since I look like a telemarketer.

    If the federal list works, you won't have to check caller-ID, you can just answer the phone.

    --
    Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
    1. Re:list is better by Mark+Bainter · · Score: 1

      That's not how it works. With the system he was talking about if you don't have a valid caller-id setting a machine at the phone company answers and asks for your name/etc kinda like a collect call. The phone company then calls you (which shows up under privacy manager or whatever) and replays whatever was said and you decide if you want to connect the call or hang up. It's a truly great service, because if they don't say anything or hang up before the initial part completes you don't get a call at all. Which happens quite frequently. However, those people you /want/ to talk to can still get through.

      --
      "No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare."
      --James Madison
  145. ...And it doesn't display in Mozilla by mengel · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The pages are all made by MicroSoft Visual Studio 7.0:


    <html>
    <head>
    <title>National Do Not Call Registry</title>
    <meta content="Microsoft Visual Studio 7.0" name="GENERATOR">
    <meta name="keywords" content="National Do Not Call Registry, telemarketers, FTC, Mobile Phone, Home Phone, Registration, Do Not Call" />
    <meta content="C#" name="CODE_LANGUAGE">
    <meta content="JavaScript" name="vs_defaultClientScript">
    <meta content="http://schemas.microsoft.com/intellisense /ie5" name="vs_targetSchema">

    <link rel='stylesheet' type='text/css' href="css/style.css">
    <script src="WebTrendScript.js" language="Javascript1.1"></script>

    </head>

    Which currently doesn't show up in Mozilla *at all*.

    Now does Microsoft intentionally make their Visual Studio stuff (not to mention the latest PowerPoint, etc.) generate almost-HTML that don't display in Mozilla? You be the judge...

    --
    - "History shows again and again how nature points out the folly of men" -- Blue Oyster Cult, 'Godzilla'
    1. Re:...And it doesn't display in Mozilla by CompWerks · · Score: 1

      Doesn't look like there is anything that would keep it from displaying in Mozilla with the exception of some body tags and who knows what evil lurks in the web trends javascript. =) Prob worth a download and look-see.

      --
      If you can read this sig - the bitch fell off.
    2. Re:...And it doesn't display in Mozilla by el_gordo101 · · Score: 1

      No, they don't. Poor developers write poor HTML code that does not display well in Mozilla. Thank you for playing, come again!

      --
      TODO: Insert witty sig
  146. Re:Spam Gourmet - Thank you!! by lscotte · · Score: 2, Informative

    Thank you! I hadn't heard of this particular one previously. I've been creating domains in dhs.org or dyndns.org, and then creating aliases on my mail server. This lets me disconnect mail addresses (and domains should it need to get drastic), but I generally like the Spam Gourmet concept better, and it doesn't require any mail server setup.

    I guess the only comment I have is to use watch words, so some spammer doesn't register "haha.99.you@spamgourmet.com" or whatever. Sure, you can manually delete it, but they could keep creating new ones. Having a watchword (or prefix) that you change every once in a while solves this.

    Good stuff. Thanks!

    --
    This post is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.
  147. In a related story... by taped2thedesk · · Score: 0

    Telemarketing companies plan to move to Canada on Sept. 30th.

  148. Ha by phriedom · · Score: 1

    That is okay, I buy things with cash so they don't get my phone number.

    If it really is something that I want to register and give a phone number on, then they only get one call out of it, because they are still required by law to not call you if you request it. So you just remove their permission the first time they call.

    They will be shooting themselves in the foot if they give you an incentive NOT to register the product.

    --
    Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
  149. Telemarketers unite! by Celandro · · Score: 1

    Attention other telemarketing companies. Due to this nice individual, we have a certain way to challenge this business damaging law. We simply have to sign everyone up for the DNC list in case no evil hacker does it!

    We've got 2 options here:
    Black hat: Release a virus in to the wild that sets up a network, similar to a DDOS network. Then send a list of targets to one machine and have it split the list and send the majority of it to other servant machines it has infected, who split the list, etc. Then each machine registers its section of the phone list using free email accounts and spoofed ips.

    White hat: Same as black hat except the client is downloaded by everyone who wants to support the telemarketing industry. The client would work like the seti@home client, getting lists of phone numbers in chunks to register.

    Black hat is definitely the way to go since the whole idea is to not be traced so we can get the whole list thrown out in court!

    So lets work together to develop this virus and sign everyone up for the do not call list! Thanks unfortunateson for the wonderful idea, we shall all call you to thank you and offer you wonderful free vacations to time shares and send emails about how to enlarge your penis.

    Anonymous Telemarketer

    1. Re:Telemarketers unite! by unfortunateson · · Score: 1

      I only have one thing to say about this --

      Aaarrgghhh!

      --
      Design for Use, not Construction!
  150. M$ Munchkins... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...have modded you down.

  151. Worried about providing them an email? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    Be more worried about providing them your name.

    I don't want to give away what I used, but when my state came out with its list about two or three years ago, I used a generic term that conveyed what I wanted to convey.

    The telemarketers don't call anymore. The only annoyance now is the rare charity that makes the mistake of calling, or the business that requires a face to face meeting to sign the contract to complete the sale, who is exempt from the law. They call once, and generally don't call again.

    There's only a couple of companies calling now, one that uses an automated dialer telling me that I've won a radio contest, and includes a sales pitch, and another with a sales pitch that if you say "yes" connects you to a carpet cleaning company, or carpet installing company, or something like that. About once a year. I haven't nailed them yet, but I will eventually if they keep calling.

    The last ones I'm going to nail are the non-profit org that keeps calling about fixing my credit. They call my cell phone, and leave a long computer generated message on the voicemail. Their mistake is that they supply an 800 number. Haven't abused it yet, but that's on the list next time they call.

    Think about it, and you can get your phone number on that list without actually giving them your name, and without it getting thrown out for its blatency.

    How about starting a slashdot article on spam messages that include 800 numbers? I have some 800 numbers from spammers that I'd love to list.

  152. Is it just me.... by n8j · · Score: 1

    or is anyone else a little paranoid about putting their phone number on a list available to all the telemarketers? I wonder how well this will be enforced.

  153. Basic question... by StressGuy · · Score: 1

    I've not gone on the website yet (/.'d) so maybe they have the answer. All the same, maybe someone here knows the answer.

    If the vast overwhelming majority of telemarketers block their phone number, how do I report violations?

    Right now, the FCC requires all businesses to identify themselves on request, but it's kind of hard to enforce when all they got to do is hang up the phone and you don't know where the call came from.

    Perhaps it would be a good idea to require businesses to not block thier caller ID and make private call rejection a free service.

    just my thoughts....

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
    1. Re:Basic question... by sik+puppy · · Score: 1

      I wish i had my telephone * cheat sheet handy. My provider has a *# that logs the call as a harrassing phone call and logs it for further review and follow up by the provider and law enforcement.

      --
      The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers. Shakespeare, Henry VI, Part 2, Act 4, Scene 2
  154. National = US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I take it that this service is for the USA, although the Slashdot article doesn't say so. The UK has had a similar system in operation for a while, and it works. (Gets rid of double-glazing salespeople anyway.)

    It would be nice if Slashdot and its contributors recognized that the readership is global. It pisses me off when posts talk about "the government" or "the army" or "the constitution" or "the industry" as if no other country than the USA has these things, or could possible be of interest.

    1. Re:National = US? by cookiepus · · Score: 1

      Pal, I don't know what you're reading, but in my browser /. is either .org or .com. Those are American top level domains, if I am not mistaken. If it was .org.uk or whatever, then it'd be reasonable to assume that "national" refers to "british" etc.

  155. Run and hide... by Eosha · · Score: 1

    Are we allowed to slashdot a government server? Does the fact that I'm a slashdot user make me a cyberterrorist? Should I go hide in my bunker yet?

    *whimper*

    --
    I have a girlfriend whose name doesn't end in .JPG
  156. when all else fails, have fun with telemarketers by Cnik70 · · Score: 2, Funny

    If a non-profit organization calls you, remember that the people they hire to do this crap read from scripts and are under orders to not hang up untill they try every angle on you. Take this opportunity to ask them what they are wearing. Tell them how much telemarketers turn you on. And above all feel free to scream wild orgasmic yulps as every offer they make gets you hotter and hotter....

    --
    -Cnik
  157. Better Idea by penguin_dance · · Score: 1

    Get an unlisted number. Don't give it out to companies, use your business line if you have to. Since most home telemarketers call at night they won't catch you (unless you work the night shift.) ;-) And I've never had them leaving messages. If I write a check and the clerk asks for a phone number, I either give them my work number or make one up. Usually the latter--I know the check is good so they DON'T need that information. Goes without saying--never have them print it on the check!

    We very rarely get calls, we used to get calls for the previous owner of the number--mostly those geared for Hispanics as was the case. Since we don't speak Spanish they weren't interested in trying to hook us, apparently.

    Being as I don't want to, by virtue of signing up, become fresh meat for every charity (legitimate or not) and political fundraiser (how nice of politicians to leave THAT loophole in), I'll pass, thanks.

    --
    If you've never been modded as "flamebait" or "troll," you've never tried to argue a minority viewpoint here!
  158. so slow thanks to Microsoft.... by JThaddeus · · Score: 1, Troll

    Is anyone else finding this site ungodly slow. No suprise! A check with Netcraft shows it to be running IIS 5.0. Lord! Folks here have been trying all day to get in--only two of us have made it and we've both been stuck on the submission page for 30+ minutes. Probably running Moose-and-Squirrel SQLServer, too... Compared to how Apache handled the Starr Report, this is a great banner for Microsoft and it reads not ready for enterprise play.

    --
    "Love is a familiar; Love is a devil: there is no evil angel but Love." --William Shakespeare ('Love's Labors Lost')
    1. Re:so slow thanks to Microsoft.... by nacturation · · Score: 1

      What a dickhead. Okay, you go and stick your single Apache server and then have CNN broadcast the website URL. What?!? Your server can't handle that traffic load either?? Better check your assumptions, pal. Apache isn't the greatest either. Why not go out and get yourself a Zeus web server instead?

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  159. No email since 2:00 AM EDT by wayne · · Score: 1
    Well, I signed up only two hours after it was open, and I still haven't gotten my confirmation emails.

    Apparently, there are also problems if you try to use email addresses with "funny" characters, like +, % or &. (All of these are perfectly valid and useful characters, but they are rejected anyway.)

    --
    SPF support for most open source mail servers can be found at libspf2.
  160. no wonder the site is soo slow by NetMagi · · Score: 1

    "The site www.donotcall.gov is running Microsoft-IIS/5.0 on unknown."


    they're prolly storing the phone numbers in an MS access database too :P

  161. The telemarketing firms should be happy about this by kbrunsting · · Score: 1

    Now instead of wasting their time and money calling people who will never buy something from a telemarketer, they can focus their calls on the few thousand people who actually do buy something from them.

  162. slashdotted by mboedick · · Score: 1

    Maybe this brutal slashdotting will cure telemarketers of their delusion that most people like being called at home and informed about their great products and services.

  163. Slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's slashdotted, is anyone running a mirror?

  164. How they get their numbers. by Sanction · · Score: 1

    If it is like the way other groups try to twist their importance with lobbying, they include everything from the place that does their employees dry cleaning to the 7-11 where they might get a hot dog in their "economic impact". If all economists were layed head to feet in a line around the world...it would be a good thing :)

    --
    Well I'm the doctor and I say you're dead, so shut up and take it like a man!
  165. Reasons why nobody's getting email... by ONU+CS+Geek · · Score: 1

    To save you all some hassles when you're trying to figure out *why* you haven't gotten your emails...

    Donotcall.gov has no MX records. No reverse DNS on any of their outbound mail boxes. And they obviously are not processing bounces/complaints/etc. since nothing on that netblock has port 25 open.

    It's really sad because one of the guys from AT&T Government services posted in NANOG this week looking for advice on getting his emails through.

    --

    I disable sigs...do you?
    1. Re:Reasons why nobody's getting email... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that for real, lol

    2. Re:Reasons why nobody's getting email... by ONU+CS+Geek · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Seriously...it's for Real.

      --

      I disable sigs...do you?
  166. How it's done in Switzerland by Doctor+Hu · · Score: 1
    Looking at this from across the Atlantic, it looks a rather complex and baroque solution. Here in Switzerland, you just ask for your phone directory entry to be flagged as 'advertising not desired' (it shows up as an asterisk by your number(s) in the directory services - printed, online, whatever). Given costs of local calls telemarketing here isn't at plague levels, but it does make a difference, and if you do get an unsolicited call regardless, telling the caller that your directory entry is flagged tends to discourage persistence on the part of the caller.

    The other nice point is that your address isn't in the files that the directory compilers sell to the snailmail marketers - which also helps, after a year or so.

  167. WARNING! by Aetrix · · Score: 1

    Telemarketers realize now that they have a limited time before October 1 to call you. The National Do-Not-Call list (DNCL) is released to the telemarketers before Oct 1, and they can, completely legally, call you up to 13 times a day between the day the receive the DNCL and Oct 1. (13 times a day = once an hour from 8a -9p in your local timezone) I saw this in Wisconsin and in Massachusetts. The two weeks before the DNCL was enforced in Wisconsin, I received over 20 telemarketer calls a day, from 8am to 9 pm.

    If you do not already receive a high volume of telemarketer calls, and you are intending on joining the national DNCL as a preventative measure, I recommend waiting until after the Oct 1 promulgation date to sign up.

    --

    "One touch of Darwin makes the whole world kin." George Bernard Shaw
  168. MOD THIS WHORE DOWN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Post it anonymously, you jackass!

    1. Re:MOD THIS WHORE DOWN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Post it anonymously, you jackass!

      Sorry that I forgot to click the box.

      I'll remember next... er, THIS time.

  169. Feds sue Slashdot by ToadMan8 · · Score: 1

    I'll bet somehow the slashdot cannon could be considered a DoS attack. Thus slashdot just launched a DoS on the govt. I can't seem to recall taking down a federal machine before ;)

    --
    I haven't posted in so long, my sig is out of date.
  170. Re:Slashdotted by RedWolves2 · · Score: 1

    God I hope not. I am sure you don't want to fill out your phone number and e-mail address on a server you don't know.

  171. You're GIVING the telemarketers your phone number! by Mysterious · · Score: 1

    The list doesn't take effect until October - those of you signing up now are giving the telemarketers a 'live one', to do with as they will for the next three months.

    The marketers can get access to the list, with a FOIA request if no other way. Eventually they'll be required to posess this info.

    The time to register is just before the August 31st deadline, and even then the telemarketers can use your number freely for a month thereafter.

  172. Re:hungry? try donutcall.gov by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some knob from the house or senate was explaining the seniors perscription drug bill using a donut as an analogy...

  173. Re:Messing with the telemarketers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I actually got a call from one that displayed the name and number on the caller ID.

    It's Dish Satellite at 205-856-2417

    When they call it's just a recorded sales pitch.

  174. Some callers have exemptions, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it's a charity calling - I WILL NOT DONATE $$

    If it's a politician - I WILL NOT VOTE FOR "IT"

    If it's a pollster - I WILL LIE, LIE, LIE

    If it's CowboyNeal, well, that's different.

  175. Re:You're GIVING the telemarketers your phone numb by DirkDaring · · Score: 1

    And this makes it any different than them *already having my number* exactly how again?

  176. Re:Sneakemail - Disposable addresses by woods · · Score: 1

    sneakemail.com works well too. Have been using it for years.

  177. DDoS attacks against a Federal server! by lorenlal · · Score: 2, Funny

    AP - Redmond, WA
    The national "Do Not Call List" website opened for business today promising the citizens of America freedom from dinnertime solicitations. Unfortunately, the server has come under massive attack from what can only be assumed to be terrorist telemarketing OSDN subordinates. The cell, identified by a cryptic symbol of a forward slash followed by a period have admitted responsibility for their actions, and continue to hammer the server.
    A local anonymous CFO admitted that he himself has had trouble with this organization before, then excused himself to read his email from support@yahoo.com.

  178. Re:Dam it where is Canada's list by Jens_UK · · Score: 1
    And instead of 2 calls at dinner, I well get 5.

    That's just because of the exchange rate. ;-)

  179. Use a Sneakemail address by David+Ishee · · Score: 1

    http://sneakemail.com/

    --
    Your password has expired, please login to change it.
  180. Say what you will, it struck a nerve by jordandeamattson · · Score: 1

    Complain and talk about how it isn't sufficient, but this definitely struck a nerve with folks thruoghout the country. As off 8:00 AM PST today - listening to NPR on the way to work - they were getting 100 registrations a second. for myself, I filed my DNC registration at 6:10 AM PST today.

  181. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have confirmed Steve Ballmer's email to use is:

    SteveBallmer@ceo.microsoft.com

    I would guess slick willie's is billgates@ceo.microsoft.com.

    -init0

  182. This year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Howard Dean won't be elected until next year.

  183. Has anyone registered yet? by unfortunateson · · Score: 1

    I've fed it four phone numbers, and haven't gotten the confirmation e-mail yet, about four hours later.

    Could Hotmail be eating them as junk mail?

    --
    Design for Use, not Construction!
  184. Encorcement... by rufey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In order for the FCC/FTC to enforce the do-not-call list, they are going to have to get complaints from us the consumer. When filing a complaint, the consumer must be able to report either the company name or telephone number that belongs to the telemarketer. Even though its the law that telemarketers need to provide this information up-front, often they don't. If the consumer doesn't know who to complain about, then how is the FCC/FTC going to impose fines on any telemarketer?

    1. Re:Encorcement... by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1
      Caller ID: telemarketers are going to have to use equipment that identifies the calling number, even across state lines.

      *67 (or whatever) ... the phone company's way to save a number that called you.

      What would be cool would be a *something number that notified the phone company, so they could record the number and the time and send you a postcard to sinhg to start the complaint process.

    2. Re:Encorcement... by rufey · · Score: 1
      Caller ID: telemarketers are going to have to use equipment that identifies the calling number, even across state lines.

      I haven't read anywhere that caller-id is part of the law. Even if it is, I'm waiting to see how well it will be enforced.

      If I get a telemarketing call with a bogus or no caller-ID, I don't know how to tell the FCC/FTC about the caller-ID violation when I don't even get that information from the telemarketer.

      Sure I could complain that some unknown telemarketer called me, but then what? Does the phone company have the resources to track down every instance of this so that the violation can be reported?

      Maybe caller-ID should be revamped so that it is manditory, and make it so that the caller-id info that is sent can't be set by the caller (at least if your business does telemarketing). Make the phone company solely responsible for the caller-ID info that gets sent.

    3. Re:Encorcement... by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1
      The caller ID thing is a separate regulation, not part of the do-not-call thing.

      "Does the phone company have the resources to track down every instance of this so that the violation can be reported?"
      Certainly: thye have to make the conneciton in their computers to route the call, so it's just like tracing spam: get the logs.

  185. First gov site to be slashdotted? by Rooked_One · · Score: 1

    For some reason I doubt it... GO NERD POWER! =)

  186. answer to our problems by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    http://www.marketwatch.com/news/yhoo/story.asp?gui d={EA0D3D28-499C-433E-AC18-24EC8BD8B929}&siteid=my yahoo&dist=myyahoo

    answer to our problems: yahoo is BLOCKING THE EMAILS AS SPAM

    i used a yahoo email address

    is the irony not entirely painful?

    good gad ;-(

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  187. Its Obvious by Ender77 · · Score: 1

    The reason that they want your email is to send you political spam. How much do you want to bet that when election time comes everybody is going to get an email from President Bush asking for his reelection? Remember that the Do Not Call list is exempt political calls like the one EVERYBODY got during election season from Bush asking you to elect Republicans. So, it isn't that far of a stretch to guess that we will get called AND spammed next.

  188. US Motives by yintercept · · Score: 1

    Until the UN is the supreme ruler of the earth and adjoining planets, I guess all laws will be national.

    As for US motives, with lower long distance rates, there has been an increase in companies outsourcing cold calling telemarketing to India, etc.. These companies, of course, have been draining the tax base used to support the US industrial military complex.

    I think it is pretty much safe to assume that the reason behind the database is US protectionism...not concern for the consumer.

  189. Stop getting calls...we'll spam you instead by mmuskratt · · Score: 1

    Wonder what they're going to do with that information connecting your email account to your phone number, and subsequently your address? The Ministry of Information has begun its culling...

    --
    man rtfm
  190. Re:Will there be a flood of calls just before 10/1 by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1

    Yes ... I think there will be some "call now before it's too late" campaigns by the telemarketers to drum up business.

  191. Fox Again Wins Henhouse Contract by cpeterso · · Score: 1



    I'm surprised that no one has mentioned another sucky (and suspicious) thing about the do-not-call list. The list will be maintained by AT&T, who had the lowest bid for the FTC project. This is the same AT&T who has been #1 on the FCC's list of telemarketer complaints for 2001, 2002, and 2003 YTD. Maybe the FCC and FTC should have spoke with one another before the FTC gave AT&T the $3.5 million contract.

    The FCC's data show that 5,714 consumer complaints were lodged against AT&T's telemarketing activities in 2001, 2002 and the first three months of 2003. That's 22 percent more than the number of complaints about MCI, AT&T's perennial Number 2.

    "AT&T Will Run Do-Not-Call List: Fox Again Wins Henhouse Contract"

  192. Unless you use it for business... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I get a few telemarketing calls a month on my business cel. Damned D&B database will sell you to anyone.

  193. Is it *really* slashdotted? by dacarr · · Score: 1

    Considering that it wasn't slashdot that caused this site to be brought down, does this count as a slashdotting?

    --
    This sig no verb.
  194. The FTC is pretty clueless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    As an example, I once wrote them a fairly detailed letter about spyware and adware, detailing what each were, how they are installed (shady EULA's), how they are deceptive, how they degrade internet performance, etc. I wasn't really expecting a response. Well, I got one. They wrote back, saying (and I paraphrase):

    Thank you for contacting us regarding Unsolicited Commercial Email (henceforth referred to as UCE). We at the FTC are taking a hard look at UCE and expect to act on this issue very soon.... blah blah.

    You know, I expected at the most I would get a form letter, but I hoped at least to get a form letter that had some remote relationship to what I wrote them about. Idiots.

  195. call the 888 number, then. by rebelcool · · Score: 1
    I just did, and the only thing you enter is your 10 digit phone number. Have to call it from that number though.

    Like others mentioned, telephone numbers are easily verified as valid through public information. E-Mail addresses are more difficult. Therefore, if you do not want to give out your e-mail address, don't use the web form and call the 888 number instead.

    --

    -

  196. Re:HEY! I posted this 2 hours ago and was rejected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RosCo! Them Duke boys been submittin dupes aginn! Git em!

  197. Please explain this to me... by MightyJB · · Score: 1

    Everybody and their brother complains about unsolicited calls right? Well, if everyone "hates" them, how do they stay in business? Soundly like we have some "closet" shoppers here. BTW I live in Indiana and we have a state do not call list... IT ROCKS!!! I haven't recieved a call in like 2 years.

  198. Sending data in the clear ?? by lerekr · · Score: 1
    Is it just me, or is the webpage set up to send all the phone numbers and e-mail addr combos in the clear ??

    Checking my IE browser cache reveals a http URL with the numbers and e-mail stuck in. Seems like anyone with a network sniffer could be building a database as we speak !!

    So much for the FTC's privacy policy which states :

    Here's what you should know about the security of the information you provide to us: We use secure socket layer (SSL) encryption to protect the transmission of the information you submit to us when you use our secure online forms. The information you provide to us is stored securely.

    Not trusting my own eyes, I called my local paper (washington post) and even tried those enlightened folks at Wired News, but I have not heard back if I am correct in my thinking that this data is indeed being sent in the clear...

  199. donotcall.gov already crashed by SysKoll · · Score: 1

    I had a good experience with my state's Do Not Call list, so I decided to try the FTC site, donotcall.gov.

    According to netcraft, this is a Microsoft IIS5 site. I was a tad skeptical about its ability to widthstand the volume.

    Well, guess what? It's already down as of Friday night.

    I'm sooo surprised.

    --

    --
    Mad science! Robots! Underwear! Cute girls! Full comic online! http://www.girlgeniusonline.com/

    1. Re:donotcall.gov already crashed by cookiepus · · Score: 1

      I had a good experience with my state's Do Not Call list, so I decided to try the FTC site, donotcall.gov.

      For what purpose? Your state's list already protects you in the sense that anyone who wants to telemarket to people in your state needs to obtain their do not call list first. There should be no benefit to you of being registered twice.

    2. Re:donotcall.gov already crashed by SysKoll · · Score: 1

      Good observation. First reason: curiosity. When you hear about a pro-consumer nationwide measure, you want to check it out. The DMA has been running the show for so long that you wonder if you're not going to see a flying pig migration next.

      Second reason: my state protection has to be renewed yearly. I forgot to do it last month and I am now swamped with calls. The renewal will take effect in August. I figured that a 5-year protection will be less of a hassle.

      --

      --
      Mad science! Robots! Underwear! Cute girls! Full comic online! http://www.girlgeniusonline.com/

    3. Re:donotcall.gov already crashed by cookiepus · · Score: 1

      Makes good sense. Pretty odd that your state requires you to renew (and judging from your last sentence it sounds as if the fed. directory has a 5-year duration?) It'd make more sense that your registration roll over until such time as you decide to cancel your registry. I guess one reason for this is to make sure that if you move and change your phone number, the person who inherited your old number isn't stuch with the choice you made. I think in NY state you register for life, so I didn't think that there could be such nuance. Thanks for the reply, Sys.

  200. Bulk mail filters by sik+puppy · · Score: 1

    YES!

    due to the sheer volume, many major isp's have accidently flagged the confirmation mails as spam. Check your junk mail folders. More details are available at msnbc.com among places.

    --
    The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers. Shakespeare, Henry VI, Part 2, Act 4, Scene 2
  201. Lobbying doesn't always work by geekee · · Score: 1

    There are a lot of people on /. who complain that corporations run the govt. with lobby money. The don't call list is a clear counterexample to this principle. In this case, millions of voters hate telemarketers, and therefore, all the lobby money in the world isn't going to keep the don't call list from appearing. In the end, all the money in the world won't win an election if voters hate your policies. Lobby money only works on issues most voters don't care about, like DRM, DMCA, copyright extensions, etc. If you want laws changed, don't complain that you can't compete against corporate money. Instead, try to get a large number of people outraged at the law.

    --
    Vote for Pedro
  202. Telezapper by spun · · Score: 1

    I just got a new phone that has a 'Telezapper' feature. It plays the 'doo-dah-dee' tone that means 'this number has been disconnected or is no longer in service' every time you answer the phone.

    Telemarketers almost never use direct dial systems, they have predictive dialers which automatically call large numbers of numbers, knowing that a lot of them will be answering machines, disconnected numbers, and non-answers. They only patch the call through to a salesperson when there's a live one on the other end. If the machine hears the 'doo-dah-dee' tone, they hang up and remove the number from the list.

    For the first two weeks I had it, we still got the same amount of calls, but there would be no one there when we picked up. We've had it for about a month now, and our telemarkter call-volume has dropped 90 percent.

    You don't even need a special product to do it, just record the tones onto the beginning of your answering machine message and let it screen your calls.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  203. Possible for SPAM? by olafo · · Score: 1

    How about a similar registry for those who don't want to receive SPAM?

  204. Why do we have to register?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps it would be easier if the people wanting to receive those calls would have to register, NOT the vast majority of the US population!

  205. Is it just me by Lord+Fren · · Score: 1

    Or is this going to be the largest, easiest to access list of phone numbers and names?

    It specifically states that you have to get the solicitors name and phone number to file a complaint. It's difficult to talk to a real supervisor at a telemarketing center, much less get someone who knows their name and the phone # they are using. So basically, if I put my name on the list I will get a net increase in calls, since currently noone has my cell # to try to sell me stuff on. And there will basically be nothing I can do about it, unless I get a name and phone #. I'll just wait and see how this pans out...

    1. Re:Is it just me by cookiepus · · Score: 1

      Your logic is flawed to the extreme.

      0. Anecdotal Evidence: my phone number has been on New York State's 'Do Not Call' for as long as that's been around (feels like years) and no one calls. I take it nearly for granted, and it surprises the hell out of me when I am at my dad's or my gf's house and two out of the three phone calls are telemarketing.

      1. It takes a lot more to launch a telemarketing operation than it does to launch a spam compaign. A telemarketer needs to hire and train people, set up an office, etc. Once an operation has a size like that, they have to worry about legal concerns and implications of violating laws (very costly, in this case)

      3. When a telemarketer tries to sell you something, they usually... umm... tell you what it is that they are trying to sell. Most of the calls I happened to pick up while at other people's homes are either from long distance phone companies, newspapers/magazines, etc. They tell you upfront who they are, and I don't think getting their manager's phone number is a big deal.

      4. Why the hell would you put your cell number on the list if no one is calling you on it. Your cell number is not in the phone book and not on anyone's list, so why bother? It's like saying 'I don't see the need for anyone to use firewall software because my computer is not connected to the net!' Obviously! The 'Do Not Call' lists are designed to help those who get a ton of these phonecalls. If you have a number that doesn't, why bother?

      5. Companies in the U.S. generally are not intrested in outright breaking the law. If they can lobby to change laws, or employ legal loopholes to circumvent them, of course they will. But to operate outside of legality is not safe or comfortable, so it seems natural that businesses will try to comply with this regulation rather than face the consequences.

  206. Great! Now where's the DO NOT SPAM list? by Gldm · · Score: 1

    Will I have to give a phone number so they can call me and confirm it's really my email when I sign up on that one?

    --

    Introducing the new Occam Fusion! Now with sqrt(-1) fewer blades!

  207. limbo by linux2000 · · Score: 1
    My state's status on the registry included this:
    [Consumers who register by] August 31, 2003 will notice a downturn in telemarketing calls starting October 1, 2003. Consumers who register after September 1, 2003 will notice a drop in telemarketing calls within three months of the date they register.
    So I'm gonna register exactly on Sept 1, just to see if my entry goes into limbo.
  208. Its not ASP, its false spam alerts by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

    Actually what's going on is the mass emailing is setting off spam heuristics left and right. Yahoo is already blocking these emails globally. Oh the irony.

  209. telemarketing will be moving to India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's no rule that telemarketing can not be called from overseas or from Canada or Mexico

    Congratulation to all the suckers that registered

  210. I take it all back! by mengel · · Score: 1

    It looks like I simply didn't wait the 3 decades for the webpage stuff to finish downloading -- either that or they've fixed something since. As of today, it works just fine.

    --
    - "History shows again and again how nature points out the folly of men" -- Blue Oyster Cult, 'Godzilla'