Slashdot Mirror


Newest Star Wars Reviews Suprisingly Positive

Patchw0rk F0g writes "CBC is reporting on the suprising results of pre-screenings of Lucas' latest (and final) installment of his sci-fi epic. From TFA, "The advance reviews of Revenge of the Sith, the sixth - and final - Star Wars film, have been mostly positive - and in some cases outright effusive." Go figure... maybe Georgie got it right finally."

677 comments

  1. Trust in the force.... by m93 · · Score: 3, Funny

    and all will work out in the end

    1. Re:Trust in the force.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So did the bean burrito I had for lunch last week.

    2. Re:Trust in the force.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      CORUSCANT -- Presiding over a memorial service commemorating the victims of the attack on the Death Star, the Emperor declared that while recent victories over the Rebel Alliance were "encouraging, the War on Terror is not over yet."

      "We will continue to fight these terrorists, and the rogue governments who harbor them, until the universe is safe, once and for all, and the security of the Neo-New Cosmik Order ensured."

      It was one year ago today that the Death Star, perhaps the greatest symbol of the Empire's might, was destroyed in an attack by fanatic Rebels, who used small, single-person crafts to infiltrate seemingly impenetrable defenses. Thousands of mourners were on hand to remember and pay tribute to the victims and their families.

      "We lost our innocence that day," reflected one mourner. "I guess we thought we were immune from the kind of violence that happens in other galaxies. We were wrong."

      "I lost hundreds of buddies that day," said one teary-eyed Stormtrooper. "Guys whose only crime was trying make the Universe a safer place."

      Although the day was colored by sadness, the mourners found some relief in the news of a decisive victory over the Rebels.

      In an attack led by Darth Vader, Empire forces were able to rout hundreds of Rebels from a network of caves underneath the surface of the planet Hoth. "We're not sure we got them all," says a Vader spokesman. "There are a lot of places to hide in those caves. But we've delivered powerful blow to the terrorist's infrastructure, that's for sure. Today, the Empire has struck back."

      Initial reports are unclear as to the fate of Luke Skywalker, a hero among the Rebels, who is rumored to have delivered the fatal blow to the Death Star. Skywalker, a former desert-dweller from the planet Tattooine, became a part of the Rebellion after family members were killed. Skywalker was trained by a militant wing of the Rebels, known as "Jedi Knights." Fanatical in their religious beliefs, the Jedi Knights claim to derive their power from the mystical "Force."

      It's believed that Skywalker was specifically trained by infamous terrorist O bin Wankanobi. Wankanobi, occasionally called "Ben" and easily recognized by his bearded visage and long, flowing robes, achieved near-martyr status among the Rebels after his death last year during a spy mission. His more fervent followers believe that Wankanobi lives on within them today, some even claiming to hear his voice during times of duress.

      The attack on the Death Star came shortly after the Empire's destruction of Alderstaan, a planet whose government was known to harbor terrorists. Responding to criticism over the total annihilation of the planet, Vader stated, "There is no middle ground in the War on Terror. Those who harbor terrorists are terrorists themselves. Alderaan was issued ample warning. The fight for continuing Freedom is often burdened by terrible cost."

      The cost of this war can still be seen today in the continuing efforts to build a coalition government on Tattooine. Longstanding animosities among the planets various ethnic groups, including the Jawas, Tusken Raiders and scattered human settlers, have been an impediment to the peace process. The Empire continues to maintain a small peace keeping force until a provisional government is finally in place.

      Much of the difficulty in fighting the Rebel forces stems from their lack of a central organizing structure. "They don't play by the traditional rules of war," complained one spokesman. "They come in all shapes and sizes, united only by their single-minded desire to destroy the Empire before it destroys them."

      The Emperor closed his comments today by stating that "the cowardly attack on the Death Star left a deep scar on the Empire. However, we will not stop fighting until every last evildoer has been brought to justice." He paused for several moments, wiping away a tear and then added with determination, "We will never forget."

      "I wish we could all just get along," said one of the mourners. "But it's hard to offer an olive branch to a cult of religious fanatics whose main tool is violence and who insist on calling us the Dark Side."

    3. Re:Trust in the force.... by shreevatsa · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the wonderful piece, but it is a dupe!

    4. Re:Trust in the force.... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      and all will work out in the end

      If by that you mean "you will be repeatedly bent over and raped by Lucas", then yes, I agree.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  2. I see by hotbutteredhtml · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Nothing for you to see here. Please move along."

    True in so many ways.

    --
    how 'bout I give you the finger....and you give me my phone call.
    1. Re:I see by nametaken · · Score: 1

      That's funny. The first thing I thought when I saw a headline indicating postive reviews? "Nerds everywhere are still going to say it sucks."

      Either way, I have never trusted a movie review from anyone but a close friend who I know is reliable. I have yet to find a movie critic whos opinions are consistant with my tastes.

    2. Re:I see by vida · · Score: 1

      check out http://rottentomatoes.com/ it's a reviews aggregator. you'll get a zillion reviews, from sources like the NYT to iamanewmoviecriticandsuck.com, and an average score, between other things.

    3. Re:I see by martyn+s · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, rottentomatoes is not an average score, but a percentage of the total that are positive. In other words, if EVERYONE gives a movie the exact same score, 60%, then the movie will get 100% on RT since they were ALL positive. Metacritic actually gives an average score.

    4. Re:I see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either way, I have never trusted a movie review from anyone but a close friend who I know is reliable.

      Yes, but porn reviews from "Mr. Winky" are always enthusiastically positive, aren't they?

    5. Re:I see by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      I generally agree with the Filthy Critic, you may want to visit his site sometime. Once you get past the rambling yet comical preludes, you get to the meat of an actual, vitriolic or praising movie review.

    6. Re:I see by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 1

      MY god that film was awful. I went with my (then) girlfriend and her kids and tried the old "go to sleep, wake up when it's finished" trick, but it was so bloody insanely loud and irritating that I couldn't sleep and had to suffer the whole lot... *shudder*. Although, I think I fancied the mum in it. She was sorta cute...

      During Brother Bear however, i got THE BEST sleep.

      Awesome.

    7. Re:I see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you look on the home page of rottentomatoes you'll see the information below which shows the average rating of all reviews posted.

      TOMATOMETER 93 % | Fresh
      AVERAGE RATING 8.1/10
      NO. OF REVIEWS 28

  3. Tuesday Morning Taco Dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice work!

  4. final? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    the sixth - and final - Star Wars film

    final? aren't there supposed to be nine when they are all done?

    1. Re:Final? by Avyakata · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe it depends on how well this one goes over...

    2. Re:final? by Skye16 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Lucas said flat out in some magazine-or-other that he was not doing the final 3, and since he, himself wasn't doing the final 3, he wasn't going to allow them to be made, either.

      Things may have changed since then, but that's the last I heard of it.

    3. Re:Final? by kniLnamiJ-neB · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While I'd like to see 7,8, and 9, I'm not sure how feasible that would be. Have you seen recent photos of Mark Hamill and Carrie Fisher? Time hasn't been too good to them (to put it mildly!). I guess he'd have to recast at least 7. I don't remember how far into the future the movies go, so I guess if we were following the story of Han and Leia's grandchildren, it would be about right... but IIRC #7 is like 5 years after RotJ. So I guess the question is, who should be the next Luke Skywalker? (Or, more importantly for the /. crowd, who's the next Leia?)

      --
      Windows isn't the answer... it's the question. NO is the answer!
    4. Re:Final? by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      It's just wishful thinking.

    5. Re:final? by AndroidCat · · Score: 5, Funny

      Later he might go back and re-edit those comments with enhanced digital effects...

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    6. Re:final? by Golias · · Score: 5, Funny

      tHere wAs always supposed to be oNly Six... He said "nine" back in the eighties, because the technOlogy To make only six Films dId not Really exiSt at The time.

      now the series is completed the way he originally intended.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    7. Re:final? by rob_squared · · Score: 1

      They're already made, in book form, by Timothy Zahn.

      --
      I don't get it.
    8. Re:final? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      He did not merely say "nine." He said that the original trilogy was the middle one of three trilogies.

    9. Re:final? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't fix your keyboard / OS issue or whatever it is soon, you won't be taken very seriously. :-)

    10. Re:final? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you look closer at the caps, you just might notice a hidden message.

    11. Re:final? by flosofl · · Score: 2, Funny

      Pull out the old decoder ring and look at the post again.

      --
      "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
    12. Re:Final? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no reason that a third trilogy would follow the story line in the many Star Wars books. In fact, the books are so lame that there is plenty of reason NOT to follow them.

      IMO the best would be to have a far future (generations later) with Skywalkers, and Solos being legendary heros, or maybe an 800-year-old Luke fulfilling the prediction of Luke not aging as well as Yoda.

    13. Re:final? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THANK YOU CAPTAIN OBVIOUS!

    14. Re:final? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wow. Your hidden message wasn't nearly as subtle as the great-grandparent post. :)

    15. Re:final? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Troll? Idiot moderators are too used to rotten typing to consider it might have been intentional.

    16. Re:final? by AviLazar · · Score: 0, Troll

      In part 3 of 3 of triolgy 3.... "Duke heavy breathing I am heavy breathing Your heavy breathing Grandfather cue evil doomsday vicotry music"

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    17. Re:final? by learn+fast · · Score: 1

      I think he's changed his mind three or four times on this one.

      If he's finally remembered how to make a good movie, he could start by re-writing and re-shooting the first two. Then he can digitally remove all that crap he added to the originals.

      Then maybe we can start talking about making whole new movies.

    18. Re:final? by Golias · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Troll? Idiot moderators...

      No need to fret for my sake, AC. If I got a chuckle out of a couple people I'm happy. I've got Karma to burn.

      This reply, for example, is way Off Topic. :)

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    19. Re:final? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      aStuTe observation my Friend. lUcas LOveS his story and hE just wants to tell it to us appRopriately.

    20. Re:final? by dorward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Didn't he also say, flat out, that there would be no DVD release of Episodes 4-6 until after the Prequal Trilogy was finished?

    21. Re:final? by Metatron · · Score: 2, Funny
    22. Re:final? by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      tHere wAs always supposed to be oNly Six... He said "nine" back in the eighties, because the technOlogy To make only six Films dId not Really exiSt at The time.

      Been there, done that, gotta get the T-shirt.

    23. Re:Final? by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      "I don't remember how far into the future the movies go"

      Actually, it doesn't go into the future

      *SPOILER WARNING*

      In the beginning of the movie, they will show some text starting with "A long long time ago..."

      See :D

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    24. Re:final? by badasscat · · Score: 3, Informative

      He did not merely say "nine." He said that the original trilogy was the middle one of three trilogies.

      He had originally "planned" nine films - and I put "planned" in quotes because I don't believe he ever actually thought he'd get to make all nine. Then sometime during the filming of the original trilogy, he said "screw it" and condensed the plot of the last four films in the saga into Return of the Jedi. There is no story after Return of the Jedi as Lucas originally envisioned it. (Sure, there are some obvious story continuations you can make, and I'm not a Star Wars geek so I'm just guessing books have been written post-Jedi, but Lucas' original story only extends to the end of that film.)

      Of course, the Modern Humorist has a good take on all this.

    25. Re:final? by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      Ja, er hat "nein" gesagt.
      Aber, für übergenug geld...

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    26. Re:final? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You paid $16 for a t-shirt with three words on it?

      Assuming you own an injet printer, a $5 Haines shirt and a $0.50 sheet of transfer paper gets you there a lot cheaper, you know.

    27. Re:final? by Class+Act+Dynamo · · Score: 1

      With the changes he made in digitzing the first three, some might argue that those are three new movies counting as the seventh, eighth, and ninth.

      --
      My other computer is a Jacquard loom.
    28. Re:Final? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      With todays pc tech i don't see a problem.After all,If they can put dead guys in acting roles i don't see why they couldn't give luke,han,and leia facelifts.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    29. Re:Final? by Icehouseman · · Score: 0
      Have you seen recent photos of Mark Hamill and Carrie Fisher? Time hasn't been too good to them (to put it mildly!).

      Suppose 15 years from now George decides to make 7, 8 and 9, George could simply have his ILM guys edit out all the ugliness and fatness. Hell at that point, he would just hire them as voice actors and not worry about all the problems with stages and acting and filming and all that. He could make all three movies at ILM.

    30. Re:Final? by cens0r · · Score: 1

      There is no 3rd trilogy. Originally the third trilogy was about Luke's sister (who wasn't leia) and how she had to come and redeem both him and Vader (Luke kills the emperor and joins Vader in episode 6). However, lucas decided near the end of ESB that leia would be luke's sister and he would have luke be the final hero. Hence there is no final trilogy.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    31. Re:final? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lucas said flat out in some magazine-or-other that he was not doing the final 3, and since he, himself wasn't doing the final 3, he wasn't going to allow them to be made, either.

      this is the reason why some reviews are positive...

      it's the last friggin one... first star trek, now star wars, wooot! now nerds and geeks everywhere can get on with their lives.

    32. Re:Final? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, that's how the song "American Pie" starts.

      The Star Wars intro tag only says "long" once.

    33. Re:final? by bobba22 · · Score: 0

      Han shot first? What does it mean?

    34. Re:final? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I seem to recall Lucas said in an interview (WAY BACK) that there were nine episodes... I keep hearing "final" in the media... and I keep remembering Lucas saying nine... so there are three more...

      At the time, his was even asked about some of the originals coming back in the last three episodes to play the same roles... that lots of plot lines and clues to finish up in the FINAL THREE episodes...

    35. Re:final? by Treebeard+the+Ent · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, in some commentary that was on the beginning of the OT VHS re-release in the early/mid 90's (the LAST OT re-release before the special edition), Lucas said that the OT was the middle part of 3 trilogies. This was well after ROTJ was released obviously, so why would he say what he did if he truly did not foresee any further story after ROTJ?

      --
      Never argue with an idiot. They will just bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.
    36. Re:final? by JediTrainer · · Score: 1

      Riiiiight. And he ALSO said flat out some time ago that Star Wars will never be released on DVD. So do you really believe anything he says?

      --

      You can accomplish anything you set your mind to. The impossible just takes a little longer.
    37. Re:final? by cparisi · · Score: 1

      There is an interview with Lucas here:
      http://www.freep.com/news/latestnews/pm3907_200504 26.htm
      in which he describes the story behind the story.

      Originally, it ("Star Wars") was meant to be one movie. I wanted to start in the middle. It was meant to be a Saturday matinee serial. You never saw the first three episodes and you never saw what happened afterwards, I wrote the back story. I wrote what happened in Episode I, II, III and then I did Episode IV and it grew. It got so big that I chopped it up and made it into three movies. And then when I finished those three with "Return of Jedi," I didn't think I would go back and do the other ones.

    38. Re:final? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a feeling that if Episode 3 makes more money than Titanic, he will say that he has the story written for episodes 7 through 9, and he will either produce them or give them over to someone to produce. "Rick Berman perhaps? ;D"

    39. Re:final? by DarKnyht · · Score: 1

      If you look in the original version of the Star Wars: The Adventures of Luke Skywalker novel (written by George Lucas), he made it sound like there was more than one saga planned. These six movies only make up one saga: the rise, fall, and redemption of Anakin Skywalker.

      But then, originally Luke Skywalker was Luke Starkiller, Han Solo was a green alien, and everyone and their brother carried around lightsabers.

      --
      Voting them all out of office, now that's change I can believe in.
    40. Re:final? by Reziac · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In fact, Lucas swore up and down that the first three films would NEVER EVER be released on videotape.

      [eyeing my set of original VHS tapes] I guess I'm seeing things again.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    41. Re:final? by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      By the first two, I hope you meant Episodes 1 & 2, not Episodes 4 & 5, which are the real "first two" for most of us!

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    42. Re:final? by ChewbaccaD · · Score: 1

      Always in motion is the future...

    43. Re:final? by kill+-9+$$ · · Score: 3, Informative

      And last I checked, none of the original trilogy were released on DVD. So techinically, he is correct.

      --

      -- A computer without COBOL and Fortran is like a piece of chocolate cake without ketchup and mustard
    44. Re:final? by krelian · · Score: 1

      Just wait, in a couple of years he is going to say that he was understood upside down.

    45. Re:final? by utexaspunk · · Score: 4, Funny

      HANS HOT FIRST? I don't get it -Is that german gay porn?

      (for the humor impaired, yes, I DO get it...)

    46. Re:Final? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Word around is that there are 3 more in the works and that they involve Mara Jade, which means they'll be cribbed from some of the aftermarket novels.

      Timothy Zahn's "Thrawn" trilogy would probably work best, of the ones I've read. It has an interesting new bad guy and for the most part, tolerable plotting that follows reasonably from the existing SW universe.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    47. Re:Final? by JVert · · Score: 1

      So episode 7 might start off

      "Just last week..."

    48. Re:final? by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

      What about his supposed comment about Zahn's trilogy? "Yeah, that's pretty close to how I was going to have things go after Episode Six. Kudos to him" or some shit like that?

      Fucking CHRIST he pisses me off.

      --

      +++ATH0
    49. Re:final? by th3space · · Score: 1

      Any relation to Bendak Starkiller, the most feared death-duelist in all the land?

      Seriously though, I got a good chuckle out of Bendak's last name when I played through KotOR the first time.

      --
      "How like you to drag your keyboard to a gun fight." - Aaron Bedard (BANE)
    50. Re:final? by kibbylow · · Score: 1

      In fact at one point, Lucas even said there would be no VHS. Now we have several iterations of VHS and we'll likely have similar iterations of DVDs.

      VHS, VHS Gold, VHS THX, VHS THX Gold Edition, VHS Digitally Remastered THX and now DVD. In the near future we'll also have DVD Remastered Gold VHS.

      But as a collector, I'm still looking for the rare Beta THX Wookie Edition (with subtitles in Wookinese)

      Surprisingly, each iteration of release coincides with a new extension to the Skywalker ranch...

    51. Re:final? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      -Is that german gay porn?

      (for the humor impaired, yes, I DO get it...)


      You get german gay porn?

    52. Re:final? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      In the first Star Wars movie (Episode IV, "The New Hope") there's the bar scene where Luke and Han first meet. Han is sitting at a table and having an argument with some other smuggler. Han shoots him.

      When Lucas released the "digitally enhanced" version... now it's the smuggler who shoots first. Funny.

    53. Re:final? by aric4ever · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You Sir, are a genius. In ruby:
      "tHere wAs always supposed to be oNly Six... He said \"nine\" back in the eighties, because the technOlogy To make only six Films dId not Really exiSt at The time".split('').collect {|x| x if x =~ /[A-Z]/;}.join('')
      spoiler-> "HANSHOTFIRST"
      --
      The intelligence of any discussion diminishes with the square of the number of participants.-- Adam Walinsky
    54. Re:final? by kabocox · · Score: 1

      tHere wAs always supposed to be oNly Six... He said "nine" back in the eighties, because the technOlogy To make only six Films dId not Really exiSt at The time.

      now the series is completed the way he originally intended.


      Wait. I'm sure he, his family, or his estate is just started. I'm sure that he can get 12-15 movies out of these series easy. I'm sure that we'll be see a trilogy of the adventures of Han Solo and another trilogy of the rebillion troops. He could also random stick filler movies in there Star Wars 1.5 (What Made the lead character a jerk for Star Wars 2). And that doesn't even include remakes, expanded editions, VHS, DVDs, the BlueRay set which is slightly different from the HDVD set and then the format after them 2. I'll predict that we won't ever really see the end of Star Wars. Have we seen the end of Star Trek yet? Nope.

      Actually, I think I'd rather have a Star Wars TV series similiar to B5 than more Star Wars movies.

    55. Re:final? by Golias · · Score: 1

      Star Wars 1.5 (What Made the lead character a jerk for Star Wars 2).

      The Young Anakin Skywalker Chronicles?

      Terrific. Now, where the hell did I leave my noose? It might come in handy soon.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    56. Re:final? by kurzweilfreak · · Score: 1

      For some, their lives are probably coming to an end...

      --

      kurzweil_freak

      5th Kyu Genbukan Ninpo/KJJR student

      Be the darkness that allows the light to shine.

    57. Re:final? by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      Han Shot first my ass! It's clearly on the DVD that Greedo shot first! :)

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    58. Re:final? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It actually should've been the 6th and final release, not the 6th film. C'mon. This is the 3rd film, but the 6th release. The 4th film was the first release.

    59. Re:final? by BiggerBoat · · Score: 1

      I thought he said the "original films" would not be released on VHS, and to my knowledge, those originals haven't. In fact, isn't the only place you can get the original, wide screen, theatrical release of the first three films on Laser Disc?

    60. Re:final? by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      I dont know - I remember reading some script treatments for eps. 7-9 that I thought were from Lucas. I know hes sworn to never make those movies, but I beleive the stories (Beyond Jedi) exist.

    61. Re:final? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wish I could dig up the refrence to it right now, but actualy, back in 77/78, Lucas said then in one of the offical fan newsletters for Star Wars that the movie was actualy "Part one in the twelve part Adventures of Luke Skywalker". That's why all the earliest Star Wars novels that came out had that tagline on it.

    62. Re:final? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your keyboard appears to have a short in one of your shift keys.

      or perhaps your brain has a short in the don't-act-like-an-idiot lobe

    63. Re:final? by cybpunks3 · · Score: 1

      You can't have a Star Wars thread without someone spelling prequel "prequal".

    64. Re:final? by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 1

      Zahn's trilogy would be the effin' bomb if properly adapted for the screen. He captured the spirit of the films better than any of the other post-Jedi writers, and Lucas would be nuts to consider any other source.

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
    65. Re:final? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      true, mostly

      they did do the pre-special edition release, which is arguably better than the original theatre cut. thx remastered and all that jazz. widescreen, even.

      honestly, that's my favorite bunch of Star Wars movies. even special edition was.. not what was needed.

      i'm going to go now, before i go off into one of my well-trained anti-special edition rants.

    66. Re:final? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Nope, I have both standard and widescreen versions on VHS -- still sealed, so I can't swear to what's on them, tho they seriously predate modern CGI, so I expect are largely untwiddled. However I do know (firsthand, I asked the official SW archivist) that the Ep.4 original soundtrack had already been lost as of 1978 and all subsequent editions are remixed.

      The widescreen VHS came in a boxed set with a "making of" tape included, and was issued a couple years after the initial VHS.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    67. Re:final? by polysylabic+psudonym · · Score: 1

      You can get them on pirated DVD in south-east asia. (can you picture those evil DVD pirates, with eye-patches and parrots? Perhaps I should have said "DVDs produced without the written permission of the holder of american-never-ending-copyright"

      Is this "flamebait" or "informative"? I guess I shouldn't post while drunk.

    68. Re:final? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correction: His argument was with a bounty hunter working for Jabba the Hutt, not a rival smuggler.

      Han shot Greedo under the table, the classic bad guy move from the old "Oater" westerns of the 1930s. It established Han as a bit of a rogue and anti-hero, which is also why he had no interest in rescuing the princess until there was money in it, and initially seemed uninterested in helping with the raid on the Death Star. His coming around to do the right thing in the end of the movie was supposed to surprise you.

      But then Han turned out to be the favorite character of audiences everywhere. Harrison Ford became a star, and the character went on to be the romantic lead in "Empire" and a swashbuckling hero in "Jedi", so when Lucas was revisiting the films for the Special Edition, he obviously had a desire to make Han a little more heroic out of the gate.

      Re-inserting the deleted Jabba scene emphasized the pressures Han was facing due to his debts, and making Greedo take the first shot made Han seem slightly more trustworthy. It also had the unfortunate side-effect of making the formerly cool Greedo become the worst marksman in the universe, unable to hit a seated person with a carefully aimed shot from two feet away.

      While "Attack of the Clones" was a disasterously bad movie, many people feel that redefining Han's character in Star Wars was a far bigger mistake.

  5. Surprising? by shreevatsa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What's so surprising? After all, A New Hope was the best one in the original trilogy, IMHO. Lucas is a great director. Just because he did something different the last two times from what you were expecting doesn't mean you'll always hate his work. So why get surprised?

    1. Re:Surprising? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Funny

      So why get surprised?

      Because this is Lucas.
      The man who changes his mind about his grand vision more often than a typical person (not a slashdotter) changes their underwear.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:Surprising? by elasticwings · · Score: 1

      Empire will always be my fav from the original trilogy. I could do the Clerks quote, but I won't.

    3. Re:Surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the original 3 were great and these new ones are absolute garbage, an hour long pod racing scene? give me a freakin break.

    4. Re:Surprising? by fons · · Score: 0

      I can't remember the quote!

      please, refresh my memory.

    5. Re:Surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The reason is because, unlike the last two movies, this time Lucas hired a professional acting coach. When you really get down to it, the wooden acting is the worst part about these movies. The story and dialogue, while vapid, is of the same caliber of the originals, imo. The difference is that normally good actors (ever seen Portman in a non-SW movie?) come across as being terrible.

      The changelog for Episode 3 should read: "resolved issue with bad direct^H^H^H^H^H^Hacting"

    6. Re:Surprising? by glenrm · · Score: 1

      Dude Empire Strikes Back was the best of the original Trilogy. Now who directed that again?

    7. Re:Surprising? by TychoCelchuuu · · Score: 3, Funny

      OH NO!!! WHAT ARE YOU DOING?!?!?!?!?

      This is Slashdot man! Quick, take it all back! We have to bash Lucas somehow! Uhh, how about you say that he ruined your childhood and I make a joke about how he uses $100 bills for silly things like paper airplanes! If we hurry we can save your karma!

      Maybe if Episode III is good we can get rid of one of the seminal sources of Slashdotter rage. :D

      --
      Against stupidity the Gods themselves contend in vain.
    8. Re:Surprising? by Tassach · · Score: 5, Informative
      Empire Strikes Back was the best of the original Trilogy. Now who directed that again?
      Irvin Kershner
      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    9. Re:Surprising? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dude Empire Strikes Back was the best of the original Trilogy. Now who directed that again?

      Irvin Kershner What's your point?

    10. Re:Surprising? by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      His very obvious point is that the best SW movie was not directed by Lucas

    11. Re:Surprising? by PriceIke · · Score: 1

      I agree the acting has sucked the past two movies, but that partly had to do with sucky writing. "Are you an angel?" "Just being around her again is intoxicating." "I'm haunted by the kiss you never should have given me. My heart is beating, hoping that kiss will not become a scar."

      Lucas is directing and writing these three movies. That's what's wrong with them.

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
    12. Re:Surprising? by mankey+wanker · · Score: 1

      Right. And let's not forget the probable rewriting of Lucas' drivel into something tasty as accomplished by Leigh Brackett. You might have heard of her, she's quite famous really - certainly in her time.

      Lucas is going to be remembered most for what he brought to the areas of special effects and theater sound installations (his THX thingy).

      A great director he is not. A great screen writer he is not. Get it straight.

    13. Re:Surprising? by Metatron · · Score: 3, Funny

      Okay ... I'll bite ...

      Randal Graves: Which did you like better? Jedi or The Empire Strikes Back?

      Dante Hicks: Empire.

      Randal Graves: Blasphemy!

      Dante Hicks: Empire had the better ending. I mean, Luke gets his hand cut off, finds out Vader's his father, Han gets frozen and taken away by Boba Fett. It ends on such a down note. I mean, that's what life is, a series of down endings. All Jedi had was a bunch of Muppets.

    14. Re:Surprising? by Lurks · · Score: 1
      ... Lucas is a great director.

      Heh, no he really is not. If you don't get that point then there's really not a whole lot for you to understand in the entire debate.

    15. Re:Surprising? by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      That the best Star Wars movie wasn't directed (or scripted) by Lucas. He laid out the story, others did the details. Best thing for him really.

    16. Re:Surprising? by pertinax18 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Randal Graves: Which did you like better? "Jedi" or "The Empire Strikes Back"?

      Dante Hicks: "Empire".

      Randal Graves: Blasphemy!

      Dante Hicks: "Empire" had the better ending. I mean, Luke gets his hand cut off, finds out Vader's his father, Han gets frozen and taken away by Boba Fett. It ends on such a down note. I mean, that's what life is, a series of down endings. All "Jedi" had was a bunch of Muppets.

    17. Re:Surprising? by whats_a_zip · · Score: 2, Funny

      I saw a sneak peek. It was good, really good. Can't wait for the fourth episode!

    18. Re:Surprising? by cparisi · · Score: 1

      I just watched Phantom Menace with my 2 young kids and we had a blast. It is a fun movie to watch with kids.
      I am not going to let my 4 year old watch the others yet, but Phantom is a great introduction to the saga (which is what it is supposed to be, after all)

    19. Re:Surprising? by tdemark · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean:

      Not a great director is he. Not a great screen writer is he. Straight get it.

    20. Re:Surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The man who changes his mind about his grand vision more often than a typical person (not a slashdotter) changes their underwear.

      And yet we form our opinions of his work based on the ravings of the stinky basement-dwellers who post here.

    21. Re:Surprising? by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      Clerks director Kevin Smith said on his official website that the movie "is, quite simply, f----ing awesome."

      this is high praise, indeed

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    22. Re:Surprising? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      The wooden dialogue and the stoic nature of the characters really did hurt those movies. I'm not sure why they went this route, perhaps to say "Look how sophisticated people in the old Republic were!" There's a difference between sophistication and a complete lack of human expression, wit, etc.

      I guess Randall Curtis, err Lucas took the Bart's and Lisa's advice.

      "To the video store!"

    23. Re:Surprising? by mulhall · · Score: 1

      And his other movies were useless, I mean Robocop II? The Return of a Man Named Horse?

      I think this example detracts from the postulation on the Director.

    24. Re:Surprising? by mortis2600 · · Score: 1

      Wait, great director?

      You havent bothered watching Episode I and II have you? The acting was horrid. The camera work was shotty at best. Finally the casting was atrocious. The overall films were sub-standard.

      Lucas is a great producer. He can get out a great idea and really do a good job producing it into the final product. But working with the Cameras and Actors directly? Nope.

    25. Re:Surprising? by garett_spencley · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Lucas isn't that bad of a writer. At least not as bad as he is a director. He does write some pretty flaky dialogue, but good direction and acting can overcome that (ie: allowing the characters to improvise or reword so it sounds more natural and believable).

      The problem is that a script is supposed to be a just a guideline. A script by itself is nothing.. it takes a lot to bring it to life .. and a good chunk of that is the direction. Lucas' "vision" has always been stunning visual effects .. and not much else... and he writes for that.

      Don't forget that he also wrote Empire, Jedi and the Indiana Jones trilogy. As long as someone else directs his movies are usually a success.

      In fact, the only movie that he directed that was a huge success on it's own merit* was A New Hope.. and even Lucas himself admitted it was a near disaster.. and that he had brought in some brilliant editors (Paul Hirsch and Richard Chew) that saved the movie.

      * You can consider the prequels a financial success ... but IMO that's mostly due to them being part of the franchise. Had they been standalone movies I think they would have flopped (or at least I HOPE they would have flopped .. lol).

    26. Re:Surprising? by williamhb · · Score: 2, Funny

      The man who changes his mind about his grand vision more often than a typical person (not a slashdotter) changes their underwear.


      You mean non-slashdotters only change their undies a dozen times in twenty years? Gosh, and there was me thinking slashdotters were unhygienic!
    27. Re:Surprising? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      I do agree that Empire was the best, but being a huge Star Wars fan, one of the movies at least once every couple of weeks I have found that Empire doesn't have the replayability of EpII EpIV and EpVI. EpI is the only one that I find not wanting to watch repeatedly moreso than EpV.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    28. Re:Surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget that he also wrote Empire, Jedi and the Indiana Jones trilogy.

      You misspelled "co-wrote."

    29. Re:Surprising? by phong3d · · Score: 3, Informative

      Lucas is credited with the story for Empire, but the script was written by Leigh Brackett and Lawrence Kasdan: IMDB. Jedi was officially written by Lucas and Kasdan: IMDB, and Lucas, Kasdan and Lawrence Kaufman are credited with Raiders: IMDB, while the other two (now three) Indiana Jones movies have Lucas credited for story, characters and as a producer.

    30. Re:Surprising? by saltydogdesign · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Just because he did something different the last two times from what you were expecting doesn't mean you'll always hate his work.

      If, by "different," you mean, "crappy," then no, that's exactly what I expected from him.

      If you ask me, and I realize you haven't, Lucas is a good director in the same sense that Charlie Babbit (Rainman) is a good mathematician. Lucas can do a lot of things extraordinarily well, not least of which is putting together a special effects shot. He is, however, a terrible writer of dialog, he has a huge blind spot when it comes to casting, and he is utterly incapable of working with actors.

      Of course there are other people with some responsibilities for those tasks, but in the end, Lucas has to approve decisions made on those fronts, and he has never failed to fail. The cumulative effect is that his movies lack emotional depth. That's not to say they aren't passionate, but it's the passion of a bunch of adolescents (probably the reason so many SW fans latched on when they were 13). The series only ever showed any real gravitas when they hired a good writer or two to punch it up (e.g. TESB vis-a-vis Leigh Brackett and Lawrence Kasdan).

      Think I'm full of it? Ask Harrison Ford, who famously told Lucas, "You can write this shit, George, but you can't say it."

      --
      // This is not a sig.
    31. Re:Surprising? by mizhi · · Score: 1
      Maybe if Episode III is good we can get rid of one of the seminal sources of Slashdotter rage.


      Yeah, a fewer nuts with lightsaber envy on slashdot would be a good thing.
      --
      Humorless sig goes here.
    32. Re:Surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do not blame the student, blame the teacher ...
      in other words, an otherwise good actor acting badly is THE DIRECTOR'S FAULT

    33. Re:Surprising? by Walrus99 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Lucas is a great film editor. I just rewatched the first Star Wars movie and was impressed by the tension and excitement built by the editing in the attack on the Death Star. However, he is not the greatest director when it comes to acting. Compare the first movie with the second and third (in order of release). The second and third were not directed by Lucas and the acting of Mark Hamil, Carrie Fisher, etc. was much better.

      Now look at the the fourth and fifth movies. They were directed by Lucas again and the acting was terrible. I thought it was just Portman and Christensen, but then I noticed that Samuel Jackson's acting was also wooden. This is the guy who gave the "path of the riteous man" speach in Pulp Fiction and he is reading lines like an indian in a 50's western. Hopefully the presence of an acting coach will impove the performances in the sixth release.

    34. Re:Surprising? by PriceIke · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And Lawrence Kasdan is one of the best writers in the industry. If it weren't for his inclusion in the Star Wars franchise early on, those movies would probably have been disasters too. It's too bad he couldn't have helped write/written Eps I, II and III, because if he had, even with Lucas' highly questionable directing, the movies would have been MUCH better.

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
    35. Re:Surprising? by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Lucas is an extremely talented and creative writer in general. He's just a mediocre scriptwriter, unfortunately.

    36. Re:Surprising? by sneakers563 · · Score: 2, Informative

      "In fact, the only movie that he directed that was a huge success on it's own merit* was A New Hope." American Graffiti was a huge commercial success.

    37. Re:Surprising? by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      For a short period before 1977 a muse alighted on Lucas's shoulders. Then she left. I hate to see Lucas getting all the credit.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    38. Re:Surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kershner is an admitted B-Movie hack -- Westerns and serials in the old days. Which is exactly why he was perfect for neo-pulp like Star Wars.

    39. Re:Surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4 year old kid will watch anything with flashing lights, zoom noises, and goofy characters in it. Hardly a real defense of the movie.

    40. Re:Surprising? by Mant · · Score: 1

      I was excpeting something good, that apart from effects and fights had interesting (if not very deep) characters and enough good action to keep me entertained.

      He certainly did something different from that.

    41. Re:Surprising? by dejavudeux · · Score: 0

      It looks like you just lost the race condition... To make things worth, pretty soon you'll be modded redundant.

    42. Re:Surprising? by sveskemus · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't get it. Are you implying that Slashdotters change their underwear?

    43. Re:Surprising? by good+soldier+svejk · · Score: 2, Informative
      In fact, the only movie that he directed that was a huge success on it's own merit* was A New Hope.. and even Lucas himself admitted it was a near disaster.. and that he had brought in some brilliant editors (Paul Hirsch and Richard Chew) that saved the movie.
      You are forgetting about American Graffiti. That said, this perspective is interesting because I once heard Spielberg say that Lucas was a genius editor (a position arguably supported by THX1138) and that in fact he had helped Spielberg out a lot in his early years. I guess he was good enough to see when his own efforts weren't working out. He gave Hirsch and Chew editor credits, but not himself. The IMDB lists him as an uncredited editor.
      --
      It is cowardly, and a betrayal of whatever it means to be a Jew, to act as a white man

      -James Baldwin
    44. Re:Surprising? by sleepingsquirrel · · Score: 0, Redundant
      We might not want to break out the champagne quite yet. There's at least one person who isn't impressed...
      It opens next week. I saw it, and here's the thing: It's unbelievably bad. Oh I'm telling you this because movie critics won't. So far all the early reviews -- all of them, from Variety to the Hollywood Reporter to Time magazine -- have been favorable. Why? Because while the movie critics of my long-ago youth were middlebrow snobs suspicious of populist entertainment, today's critics have turned into toadies. They are afraid of being on an audience's bad side, afraid that a movie they will pan might really strike a chord. Since it's a foregone conclusion that the final Star Wars is going to make a jillion dollars, the safe thing for critics to do is say nice things about it. The only nice thing I can think to say about it is that it's not quite as mindspinningly wretched as its predecessor, Attack of the Clones, but it's plenty awful anyway. Even Yoda gives a rotten performance. Go see it if you must when it opens next week, but at least you got one fair warning here.
    45. Re:Surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd kill for a bunch of muppets now.

    46. Re:Surprising? by Feanturi · · Score: 1

      Yeah I heard Anakin gets tempted by the dark side or something. I hope it works out okay for him, he was such a nice boy in the first one.

    47. Re:Surprising? by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      The original Star Wars script is available on-line. It's completely different from what you ended up seeing on the screen.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    48. Re:Surprising? by cparisi · · Score: 1

      My 5 year old would not sit through episode VI or V. But they both enjoyed Episode I. The OT has more depth than a child can absorb, and they get bored.
      My point is: watching it with a child makes it much more enjoyable.

      As I see it:
      Lucas has created movies for different age groups, (perhaps to widen the fan base) but Episode I has its fans.

    49. Re:Surprising? by SpryGuy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Paul Hirsch and Richard Chew edited Star Wars. The film was a near disaster, and Lucas brought them in to re-edit and 'fix' it. And they did an awesome job. But don't give Lucas the credit for being a great film editor. His first cuts sucked.

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    50. Re:Surprising? by jakel2k · · Score: 1

      What? You've seen it? Where's the torrent?

    51. Re:Surprising? by Clock+Nova · · Score: 1

      And this is why he didn't like it:

      "Adults will understand it a little more specifically, of course. A hurt Obi-Wan speaks for a widespread modern faithlessness in leadership when he blurts to Anakin, "You were the chosen one!" Lucas refuses to be coy this time: Bush-bashing shares screen-time with the usual cautionary Leni Riefenstahl quotes (in 5.1 digital surround sound, droid stormtroopers jackboot their way from good to bad). When Anakin tells Obi-Wan, "If you're not with me, you're my enemy," and Obi-Wan replies, "Only a Sith deals in absolutes," Lucas deals out poetic justice to America's "Chosen One" du jour, heir to an Empire that believed "Star Wars" were not fantasy but a natural outgrowth of our manifest destiny of military expenditure."

      I think the rest of us can go on anticipating it.

      --
      There they were, sitting in the van with all those dials, and the cat was dead. -V. Marchetti, CIA
    52. Re:Surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd kill for a bunch of muppets now.

      Or at least one particular muppet.

      Anakin? Is that you?

    53. Re:Surprising? by soft_guy · · Score: 4, Funny

      His ex-wife did the editing on it, though. (And the first three StarWars movies.) She had some talent, and she kept it in the divorce.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    54. Re:Surprising? by DavesWorld334 · · Score: 1

      Wow, the dialog coach is what Lucas has frickin' needed all along. I don't object to (hardly any) of his visual or plot decisions as a director, only his complete inability to direct actors and write.

      God bless Chris Neil!

    55. Re:Surprising? by cmad_x · · Score: 1

      Yes, the old trilogy rocked. And I don't think Lucas was the one who directed the old movies. It's in the end credits somewhere. I'm quite sure it wasn't Lucas.

    56. Re:Surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every geek loves ESB because its dark... but it has one big problem. It never ended. There was no closure. Don't get me wrong. I like the movie, but it would have been better had Luke died :)

    57. Re:Surprising? by mutterc · · Score: 1
      LIAM NEESON: Well, he is the chosen one. He will bring balance to the force. I'm training him.

      SAMUEL L. JACKSON: Yoda told you no, muthafucka. What the fuck is wrong with yo, bitchass? I'll fuckin' kill you! I'm gonna be a fuckin bad ass in the next two fuckin movies, you know. My toy has a fuckin lightsaber.

      (from http://www.netfunny.com/rhf/jokes/99/Jun/menace.ht ml )

    58. Re:Surprising? by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      Jeesh can we leave the politics out of this?? The movie has enough all on it's own then to draw parallels between Anakin and the President.

      --

      Gorkman

    59. Re:Surprising? by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      The problem is that a script is supposed to be a just a guideline.

      Says who? While perhaps every film or stage play would differ slightly from its original script, the scripts are usually written to be dramatized exactly. Films are very expensive to make, and a great deal of required improvisation can easily impact the already tight schedules far more than what it would cost to hire a good dialogue writer.

    60. Re:Surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The man who changes his mind about his grand vision more often than a typical person (not a slashdotter) changes their underwear.


      Doesn't that imply that slashdotters change their underwear more often than average people?
    61. Re:Surprising? by spood · · Score: 0

      This thread is great! Two sets of identical posts in a row, all modded up! Wake up mods!

      --
      ---- Just another spud server.
    62. Re:Surprising? by GebsBeard · · Score: 1

      Its a well known rumor (fact) that during the shooting of the original Star Wars trilogy Harrison Ford told Lucas to his face, "George you can write this shit but I sure as hell can't say it." Further confirmation if you need it that George Lucas' writing and character development talents have never been his strong suit. The guy ain't David Mamet.

    63. Re:Surprising? by grammar+fascist · · Score: 1

      She had some talent, and she kept it in the divorce.

      He should have pushed for some when drawing up the settlement.

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
    64. Re:Surprising? by AVIDJockey · · Score: 1

      Lucas is going to be remembered most for what he brought to the areas of special effects and theater sound installations (his THX thingy).

      And of course, THX can be credited to Tom Holman (the OTHER reason why the "TH" is in "THX", as in "Tom Holman's eXperiment")

    65. Re:Surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lucas is a great director.

      You just lost any respect you could possibly have had.

    66. Re:Surprising? by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      Lucas isn't that bad of a writer.

      Yeah, not at all. I mean being able to come up with gems like this:

      "I don't like sand. It's coarse and rough and irritating, and it gets everywhere. Not like here. Here everything's soft... and smooth..."

      The main problem is that he's not writing comedy.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    67. Re:Surprising? by ajs · · Score: 1

      I disagree. The acting in I and II wasn't oscar-winning, but it was no worse than IV and V. Go back and watch luke deliver his lines. Sure you had Harrison Ford and Alec Guiness, but here you have Liam Neeson and Ewan McGregor who did wonderful jobs with what they were given. I think Portman is at least as good as Fisher. Oz does as well as always, of course. So what's the beef?

      I don't blame the dialog per se. No single line is all that bad (and the ones that are off are not that memorable). The real chronic problem in those movies was the pacing. Lucas needs an editor who is willing to stand up to him and tell him to cut out 20 minutes of his precious baby.

      There are scenes between Amidala and Anakin in II that would have been touching and memorable... except for the fact that they either dragged on intollerably or were abrubtly introduced on top of a very different feeling from another scene.

      I want to see a re-edit of I and II after III comes out that collapses them down into a single movie and removes a lot of the sweeping pans over CG landscapes and re-orders some of the scenes and shots.

    68. Re:Surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Marcia Lucas was also the supervising editor for 'Taxi Driver' and worked in editoral positions on 'THX 1138' and 'American Grafitti'. Not many Hollywood people have a resume with that many successful films on it.

    69. Re:Surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, surprising.

      Maybe Lucas has enough money so that he doesn't have to fill his work full of shameful cute, kiddie rubbish like Ewoks, Jar-Jar, etc. whose sole purpose is the toy futures market.

    70. Re:Surprising? by deuist · · Score: 1
      Don't forget that he also wrote Empire

      No, he didn't.

      According to this month's Wired as well as Wikipedia, Lucas neither wrote nor directed The Empire Strikes Back

    71. Re:Surprising? by KlausBreuer · · Score: 1

      >ever seen Portman in a non-SW movie?

      Yes: Léon. Excellent movie, and she plays very well indeed. Aged 12, though...

      --
      Free PC version of ChipWits at http://www.breueronline.de/klaus/chipwits/
    72. Re:Surprising? by Azathfeld · · Score: 1

      The camera work was shotty at best.

      Isn't all camera work shotty?

  6. Finally? by md81544 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Got it right finally? I'd say he did pretty well on his first attempt...

    1. Re:Finally? by Fallus+Shempus · · Score: 1

      You mean THX1138?

    2. Re:Finally? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As much as THX1138 is inarguably science fiction, it is very difficult to find a way to justify it as a first attempt at a Star Wars movie.

  7. interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    this must mean they removed jar jar binks

    1. Re:interesting... by bigwayne · · Score: 1

      No, just his voice =D

      --
      400 Person LAN for Charity: Zion LAN 2005
    2. Re:interesting... by xenoterracide · · Score: 1

      no just killed him. everyone else dies, why not him? yay.

    3. Re:interesting... by Robotron23 · · Score: 0

      Removed his head you say?

      THIS WE GOTTA SEE.

  8. Final? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does everyone keep saying 'final'? Hasn't he made several statements indicating that he intends to do the third trilogy?

  9. Generally Speaking by mattmentecky · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is there anyone out there, that say, saw 5 out of the 6 Star Wars movies and are not going to see the last one because of a review or vice versa, see the last movie because of a positive review? In general movie reviews are relatively useless unless you know a reviewer well enough to be sure that his/her personal tastes line up with yours.

    1. Re:Generally Speaking by mcsporran · · Score: 3, Funny

      They were not the films you were looking for....

      --
      This is NOT a signature.
    2. Re:Generally Speaking by damian · · Score: 1

      Well, I did see 4 out of 6 and didn't bother with fifth. The reason was the quality of the the fourth and the reviews of the fifth.

      I still might watch it if there is nothing else to rent.

    3. Re:Generally Speaking by yotto · · Score: 1

      I have seriously considered not seeing Ep3 in the theater. I almost didn't see Ep2 in the theater, but checked it out after it was out a couple weeks. I wish I hadn't. I told myself, this time, I'd listen to the bad reveiws and not go. Figures it's getting /good/ reviews instead!

    4. Re:Generally Speaking by powerlord · · Score: 1

      Ditto.

      I skipped the fifth in the theaters and finally saw it a week or saw ago on DVD (borrowed from an avid fan).

      If the reviews were as lousy as the second film, then I would have passed and worked instead on getting my wife to see Kung Fu Hustle, which has gotten rather good reviews (including from the head of my M.A. School :) ) and looks to be incredibly enjoyable, poking fun at all the classic martial arts story cliches.

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    5. Re:Generally Speaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > you know a reviewer well enough to be sure that his/her personal tastes line up with yours.

      Or, don't 'line up with yours.'

    6. Re:Generally Speaking by TheHonestTruth · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Not exactly responsive: I saw both Matrix movies in the theater (Reloaded at Grauman's), but because of the reviews, and what friends said, I, to this day, have not seen Revolutions. I'd rather just pretend that the Matrix was a one-shot movie and try to forget that I saw the sequel.

      -truth

      --

      I had a steady B+ in my AI class until I failed the Turing test...

    7. Re:Generally Speaking by stienman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In general movie reviews are relatively useless unless you know a reviewer well

      Movie reviews, like political commentary, are aimed at the fence sitters and those who haven't heard of the movie yet.

      A review won't easily change one's mind if they've already decided whether to watch a movie or not. Often they'll convince those who haven't made up their mind even if the reader doesn't know the reviewer well.

      The number of fence sitters and those who haven't heard of the movie or haven't decided often outnumber those that know before release whether they'll watch the movie or not. Reviews play a critical role in the movie ecosystem.

      -Adam

    8. Re:Generally Speaking by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      Is there anyone out there, that say, saw 5 out of the 6 Star Wars movies and are not going to see the last one because of a review or vice versa, see the last movie because of a positive review?

      Hmmm... I may see the movie regardless of the reviews, but I'm *definitely* not buying any Star Wars action figure value meals at Taco Bell unless most of the reviews are positive.

    9. Re:Generally Speaking by Threni · · Score: 1

      > Movie reviews, like political commentary, are aimed at the fence sitters and
      > those who haven't heard of the movie yet.

      Political commentary purely exists to allow the paper/programme to describe its views, so that people can identify with it, feel part of it, and buy/watch it.

    10. Re:Generally Speaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Darth rolls?

    11. Re:Generally Speaking by Deacon+Jones · · Score: 1
      Perhaps, but if I'm actually interested in seeing a movie these days, I won't read the reviews until after I've seen the movie. These days, reviews share something in common with my beef on trailers--giving away too much. Maybe not in the Star Wars case where we all have a pretty good idea of what's going to happen, but how many times have you seen trailers that give away the funniest line, or show the best action sequence, e.t.c.?

      Reviews are doing the same thing these days, and some include major spoilers, although many contain minor ones. If I'm going to give a film a chance, I'd prefer not to know the wittiest line ahead of time, or the neatest view, or whatever.

      What I will do is go to Rotten Tomatoes and scan both the freshness ratings and the synopsis. That way I get a general feel for what reviewers think without having to worry about spoilers.

      --
      I pulled a jack move to cop this sig
    12. Re:Generally Speaking by gambino21 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I saw the other 5, and I am not planning to see this one. I loved the first 3, but hated Episode 1. I was planning to not see episode 2, but then all the reviews came out saying how the second episode would bring everthing together and make up for the first one. It wasn't until after the movie was released that the bad reviews started to come out.
      Now I am hearing the same garbage about how this movie will make up for the two previous movies. This time I'm not falling for it. I did read the script posted here. And it looks to me like the third prequel has the same problems as the first two. The first 30 minutes of the movie appear to have about 28 minutes of rediculous light saber action and about 2 minutes of plot development.
      Anyway, I refuse to give any more money to Lucas' empire. Even though the reviews look good at this point, just wait until after the release, and I have a feeling you will be seeing a lot more negative reviews.

    13. Re:Generally Speaking by mattmentecky · · Score: 1

      Exactly. A review did not sway your intentions of not-seeing the last movie (The point of my post).

    14. Re:Generally Speaking by ThisIsFred · · Score: 1

      I saw the last 5 movies, but after Ep. I, I will not go to see them in a theater. Too bad, because as it turns out, the hype was somewhat right about Ep. II - it was better than the first one, but still not great overall.

      I doubt I'll go see Ep. III in the theater either, unless Lucas adds in a scene where Jar Jar is shot by Han Solo (first), gets a lightsaber amputation from Kenobi, and then gets beat to a bloody pulp by wookies with baseball bats for 5 minutes straight. Yeah, that'd bring me into the theater.

      --
      Fred

      "A fool and his freedom are soon parted"
      -RMS
    15. Re:Generally Speaking by Danse · · Score: 1

      Not exactly responsive: I saw both Matrix movies in the theater (Reloaded at Grauman's), but because of the reviews, and what friends said, I, to this day, have not seen Revolutions. I'd rather just pretend that the Matrix was a one-shot movie and try to forget that I saw the sequel.

      Same here. I own the original on DVD, but after seeing the second one, I don't know how anyone could bring themselves to watch the third. So, after quite a bit of therapy, I've managed to block out my memories of the second movie and I'm now content with simply watching the first and drawing my own conclusions as to where the story went from there. I could hardly do any worse than the tards that wrote the others.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    16. Re:Generally Speaking by TigerPlish · · Score: 1

      Like son, like father... Luke was also a whiny little bitch. "But I wanted to go to Tochi station and pick up some power converterrrrrrrs!" *pout*

      --
      The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
    17. Re:Generally Speaking by Minute+Work · · Score: 1

      "unless you know a reviewer well enough to be sure that his/her personal tastes line up with yours."

      This is EXACTLY what I've been looking for, for a long long long long time.

      I would like RottenTomatoes.com or some other site to come up with a small application that will give you a liked it/didn't like it quizz. Where the quizz randomly selects 25 movies and asks you whether you liked it or didn't like it, and then it searches the archive of reviews and it -matches- your opinions with critics who have smiliar tastes and opinions. That way you can read reviews of a critic that you tend to agree with.

      If something like this already exists, PLEASE point me in the right direction. I'd even write the application myself, I just don't have access to the data archive needed to support it.

    18. Re:Generally Speaking by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I only saw the third Matrix movie, and it traumatized me for life. Please, please stick to your resolution not to see it!!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    19. Re:Generally Speaking by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      My fiance and I actually fell asleep during Reloaded....

      I recal waking up to Donald Sutherland in some stupid god role, and went back to sleep again.

      I think I didn't enjoy it because it had been too long from seeing The Matrix...

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    20. Re:Generally Speaking by rho · · Score: 1

      Righto, same here. Matrix was a good movie, complete in itself. It didn't need sequels.

      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
    21. Re:Generally Speaking by Foosinho · · Score: 2, Funny

      Donald Sutherland? You really were asleep, weren't you?

    22. Re:Generally Speaking by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Not exactly responsive: I saw both Matrix movies in the theater (Reloaded at Grauman's), but because of the reviews, and what friends said, I, to this day, have not seen Revolutions. I'd rather just pretend that the Matrix was a one-shot movie and try to forget that I saw the sequel.

      There's this crazy lady who claims that the Wachowski brothers stole her script for the Matrix. She sounds like a total nutcase, but after seeing the fumbling hack job they did on Reloaded and Revolutions, I'm inclined to believe her. If nothing else, I firmly believe the Wachowski's got the original Matrix script from someone else, because there's no way that someone who wrote the first would come up with the juvenile drivel that made up the other two. Good directors they may be, but writers they are not.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    23. Re:Generally Speaking by ed · · Score: 1

      Yup me.

      Not just for "Attack of the Clones" but for him refusing to release a version of the original films the way they were originally screened in the cinemas.

      They may be his films but they are my childhood and nostalgia, being what it is, I want to watch the originals now and again

    24. Re:Generally Speaking by sjaskow · · Score: 1

      Maybe or it could they simply wrote a good movie and had the sketchiest of ideas for 2 and 3. When 1 blew through the roof, the movie studio offered them ton o' cash to flesh out the other two and it shows.

    25. Re:Generally Speaking by hal2814 · · Score: 1

      So by "originally screened in the cinemas" what do you mean? There were several different "original" theatrical versions of New Hope and Empire. (IMBD doesn't have any alternate versions listed for ROTJ's theartrical versions but there are probably some alternate shots, different takes on dialog, etc that have espaced IMBD's attention.) I do realize that Lucas changed a whole lot when he put out the special editions, but it's not like he hasn't been changing things all along. In fact, it is very common for movies in general to change bits here and there both while they are in theaters and when they are realeased on video. It is very unlikely that even if an "original" version of the trilogy were released, it would be the same versions you saw as a child. However, it would be nice if someone actually used the abilities of the DVD format to put out a definitive version where you could branch off scenes depending on what version you would like to see.

    26. Re:Generally Speaking by 0311 · · Score: 1

      "Reviews play a critical role in the movie ecosystem." Nice pun. - Your Eldest Brother

    27. Re:Generally Speaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Truly, truly, a good plan. I saw Revolutions on rental DVD. That it was cheaper than a theatre was a small consolation. You are better off.

    28. Re:Generally Speaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm fairly sure she won her case already.

    29. Re:Generally Speaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...because of the reviews, and what friends said, I, to this day, have not seen Revolutions...

      Aah, Slashdot groupthink at its best: our friends tell us what to think so we don't have to waste a couple hours making up our own minds.

    30. Re:Generally Speaking by lobsterGun · · Score: 1

      I saw 1, 4, 5, and 6. I did not see 2 based on reviews that compared it to 1 (I was disappointed in 1).

      Based on the early reviews, I plan on seeing 3.

    31. Re:Generally Speaking by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      I'm going to see it as soon as I download it...

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    32. Re:Generally Speaking by LurkerXXX · · Score: 4, Funny
      If anyone suggests you see any sequels to the original Higlander movie, please do the same.

      "It all began 500 years ago on the planet Zeist..."

      NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

    33. Re:Generally Speaking by solios · · Score: 1

      Reloaded is the first time I've ever gotten bored and started looking at the clock during a fight scene. Unfortunately, this has since extended itself (Appleseed 2004, Revolutions).

      And the Dragonball Z shit at the end of Revolutions? Man. Gods.

      I'm glad I saw that shit in the theater, really. I didn't pay for it and it means none of my personal hardware will ever be profaned by the DVD or divx.

    34. Re:Generally Speaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. So in your effort to be socially acceptable you just let your friends tell you what to do. You are a weak-minded simpleton, not a champion against evil big bad Hollywood moviemaking.

    35. Re:Generally Speaking by PhilipMckrack · · Score: 1

      I wasted my time and money and came to the same conclusion as everyone else. I wish someone could have convinced me what to think and not waste my time.

    36. Re:Generally Speaking by TheHonestTruth · · Score: 1
      I love ACs. So spineless that they won't even use a login. Good show.

      In retort, I wasn't trying to be "socially acceptable," I was trying to avoid wasting $10 and 2 hours of my life. My friends did not "tell me what to do." They said "it's terrible," the reviews said "it's terrible," and after watching the crapfest that was Matrix Reloaded, I said "it's probably terrible."

      But really, thank you for weighing in with your worthless opinion. You really showed me. No really, you did. You showed me like I showed Hollywood. I mean seriously. Thank you. I've reformed. I'm going to change my life now. Your comment was so insightful, it was like looking into the eyes of God and seeing His soul, while at the same time, achieving Enlightenment while at the same time enjoying the feeling of squeezing out a 2-pound turd. Really, you should take that on the road. I mean, there are people in America that *gasp* think differently than you and you should let them know how wrong they are. It would be a service to mankind. I bet you could get Nike to sponsor you. Like, "Just tell it" or something. It would sort of be like Forrrest Gump running around America. Eveyone would just follow you to hear what you have to say, you know because it's so insightful. I mean, Dr. Phil has nothing on you. You should take his show. And Oprah's too. You wouldn't need to give out cars, because you could give out comments and you would be like "you get a useless comment and you get a useless comment and you get a useless comment" and everyone would be jumping up and down crying because OMFG they never had a useless comment given to them and their families all knew how badly the people needed useless comments. And then you could go on the Daily Show and tell John Stewart some useless comments and he'd say "You're a dick." But then you could go go to the White House and advise President Bush in foreign policy because, really, what could your comments hurt at this point? And President Bush would, seriously, think you were a genius. Then Maddox would be pissed because you stole his thunder for being the biggest dick in America and he'd write up some scathing article about you. Steve Jobs, so impressed wioth your witticisms would come out with the ACPod which just plays useless crap all day long and everyone would buy by the millions (the 6GB and 30GB models). And Bill Gate would rename Longhorn to AC because he could only hope that the next release of Windows would be as userfriendly and beneficial to the human race as you have been. It would be "teh pwn." Thanks.

      -truth

      --

      I had a steady B+ in my AI class until I failed the Turing test...

    37. Re:Generally Speaking by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      LOL since that travesty came out, it has been number one on my list of worst movies of all time.

    38. Re:Generally Speaking by hmccabe · · Score: 1

      This isn't off topic because you mentioned it :)

      The Matrix could have worked as a single film or a trilogy, as the original film worked well as a story or a first act. After seeing Revolutions, my friend and I decided someone needs to put out an alternate sequel, call it Matrix : Remixed or something. Since fans can't afford the special effects budget, animation seems to be the natural medium.

      The problem with revolutions is it was hardy a matrix movie, the vast majority of it took place outside the matrix. Isn't that why we loved the original so much? Most great sci-fi is based o traditional mythology archtypes (read Joseph Campbell for an interesting perspective on this), I would like to see Neo cope with his role and powers the way Jesus did, preferably by learning to make the matrix into something better, but realizing he can't do it all. He could learn to let his anger go, and since this is a matrix movie it would come across as cool aikido-style fighting in the "inevitable" final showdown with Agent Smith. Also, Morpheus could do something other than look worried in the passenger seat of a spaceship. And while we're at it, an ending might be a nice this to add to the whole affair.

      But hey, I'm no screenwriter. I'm a musician, call me when you need a soundtrack. Later.

      -H

    39. Re:Generally Speaking by geschild · · Score: 1

      I'm with ya.

      All the way.

      --
      Karma? What's that again?
    40. Re:Generally Speaking by initialE · · Score: 1

      Why is this funny? I believe he's absolutely right in what he says. Highlander 2++ were created in the days where nobody had conceived of the idea of a prequel to a movie ("I mean come on, you already know how the story ends...") and really did spoil the experience of watching the original movie.

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
    41. Re:Generally Speaking by dcam · · Score: 1

      I always thought there was room for prequels after the first Matrix, but there was no room for sequels. Think about it, you have the story of the first person to leave the Matrix, and the building of Zion. Failing that you have the stories of the stories of morpheus and trinity. You would however not be able to use Keanu (which is no bad thing IMO).

      --
      meh
    42. Re:Generally Speaking by The+OPTiCIAN · · Score: 1

      I was flying from Sydney to London at the times both the second and the third were released. :) I've skipped both star wars films at the cinema, but the reviews for this new one are good so I'll check it out.

      --


      Believe with me, my saplings.
    43. Re:Generally Speaking by The+OPTiCIAN · · Score: 1

      Bit strange to be posting on a thred this old, but here I go.

      One thing that was neat about the first matrix film was that it had a twist that had solid philosophical underpinnings. The rest of the series effectively abandoned this. It changed from being a believable logic story into a story about magic.

      I completely expected the second and third film to explore the possibility of there being different levels at play - for example - the machines and humans would be trapped inside another simulated world and The One's power would have been to find another breakout of that. But ... it just got bogged down in martial arts and a less-than-compelling man vs machines plot. Or perhaps this plot would have had to have ended with the rational decision most of us make - although we could be stuck within the powers of an evil scientist probing our brains, we have no evidence of this and so - rather than getting carried away worrying about it, we're better off just getting on with our lives.

      An alternative plot line would have been if Neo could have brought awakening to humans stuck in the machine such that they could reach a consensus with the machines. If they could have all become aware, they would have been able to demand concessions from the machines in exchange from continuing to function in the matrix.

      I like this idea of taking the broken bits of series and letting fans fill in the gaps. Anyway, if you find any of this interesting and would prefer to reply by email, I'm craig @ my domain name.

      --


      Believe with me, my saplings.
  10. Maybe he got it right... by aendeuryu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Or maybe George is cashing in a few favours from friends in the media. Frankly, while it's possible that everyone's expectations were so low from Ep 1 & 2 that anything looks good in comparison, this is also the media which blindly and stupidly supports anything these days. These companies are absolutely desperate to be the one who gets on the bandwagon first.

    1. Re:Maybe he got it right... by TychoCelchuuu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How many friends do you think George Lucas has in the media? He formed his own movie company because he HATED the studio system; he never appears on talk shows or gives interviews; Lucasfilm isn't even a publicly traded company. He has as much sway over what movie reviewers say as you do.

      --
      Against stupidity the Gods themselves contend in vain.
    2. Re:Maybe he got it right... by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      So I gather you've seen the preview yourself?
      Maybe, just maybe, this film IS actually not so bad.

      (IMHO, EP 1 & 2 were still pretty good compared to 90% of the other movies out there, just not as good as the old trilogy).

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    3. Re:Maybe he got it right... by ajs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are some reviews of Sith that are coming from people who a) are filing their last review b) publicly hated 1 and 2 and c) don't entirely gush (but come close) over Sith.

      It looks like the movie manages to touch on whatever it was that made people stand up and take notice of 4 and 5. It has relatively simple characters (just like all of the rest) and some really cliche moments (just like all of the rest), but gets back into the spirit of what SW had lost.

      My personal take on this is the same as the review that I linked to above: Lucas had a LOT ends to tie up and had to cut the story down brutally until it fit. He essentially became his own editor, and what 6, 1 and 2 needed more than anything else was an editor. All of that "so-and-so was an awful actor" that you heard from 1 and 2 was really more a factor of script and the pacing that the movies ground the audience through. If the actors had all been well-established like Ewan McGregor, you would have been able to easily pick out the difference between bad acting and horrid pacing.

      I love the landing gear metaphor for 1 and 2. It's very apt. and really captures the problem with those movies. LK helped get the pacing right in 5, and I think AG had a lot to do with the pacing in 4. Finally, GL has found the strength to build decent pacing in 3, so let's hope that he learns from this. I look forward to another 20 years of great story-telling WITH good pacing from this master tale spinner.

      One other factor that you might consider: as this movie tries to tie 2 and 4 together, it must act as a transition back to the story that we grew up loving. In that sense, perhaps 3 also directly draws some of that feel back from the 70s....

    4. Re:Maybe he got it right... by TheHonestTruth · · Score: 1
      IMHO, EP 1 & 2 were still pretty good compared to 90% of the other movies out there, just not as good as the old trilogy

      I am always amazed at how well blind people can utilize the visually-oriented web. Welcome to /., my sight-challeneged friend!

      -truth

      --

      I had a steady B+ in my AI class until I failed the Turing test...

    5. Re:Maybe he got it right... by Ubergrendle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed -- all Slashdotters should have their anti-marketing shields up at maximum power. Lucas realises this is his last kick at the can, and his host of Lucas media companies will milk this for all they're worth.

      Call in a favour from your friend Spielberg, give Kevin Smith (who has made only one good movie) a free preview, give umpteenth number of 'exclusive' interviews, release $50 press kits to whoever asks...

      This movie ~might~ be good, it ~might~ be better than the first two of the prequel trilogy. However, we heard all this twice before and most of us were burned. Don't be a sucker and go for the three-peat...lay low and wait for popular opinion, read legitimate film critics (rotten tomato) and gauge their aggregate response.

      of course, if you have a 1978 Battle Star Galatica lunchbox in shrinkwrap, you can ignore my comments.

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    6. Re:Maybe he got it right... by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      Way to go commenting only on the part in paranthesis!

      p.s. IMHO means "in my humble OPINION". Judging by how well the movies did, I'm guessing a lot of my sight-challenged fellow humans agree. But you're free to prefer any of the other brilliant movies out there *cough*.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    7. Re:Maybe he got it right... by TheHonestTruth · · Score: 1
      a) it's a joke, lighten up.
      b) The EP1 did well because "OMFG a new star wars movie *drool*" I know, I was one of them. EP2 did well because "Holy crap the first one sucked. But hey, at least this one can't be as bad. I hear there's less Jar-Jar and they got this kid from Australia who's supposed to be pretty good." I know, I was one of them.

      It was said in good fun. I'm sure you think Joe vs. the Volcano, which I unabashedly admit to thinking is great, is a terrible movie and not worth the disc it's printed on. But hey, we're all different and that's what makes poking fun at each other fun.

      -truth

      --

      I had a steady B+ in my AI class until I failed the Turing test...

    8. Re:Maybe he got it right... by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      Wow, way to get excessive. I guess by your .sig you'd be a man. :-)

    9. Re:Maybe he got it right... by Schwarzchild · · Score: 1

      "he never appears on talk shows or gives interviews"
      Wrong. He's been on 60 minutes at least twice.
      --

      "sweet dreams are made of this..."

    10. Re:Maybe he got it right... by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      He has as much sway over what movie reviewers say as you do.

      Uh, anybody who can control who gets to see the film before it is released has far more sway over reviewers than I do. You do understand that reviewers rely on this early access to do their jobs?

    11. Re:Maybe he got it right... by TychoCelchuuu · · Score: 1

      If you're truly convinced that George Lucas has witheld early previews to reviewers until they agree to give him a good review, then that's your opinion. I just don't see why he's more likely to do it than any other moviemaker on Earth. George Lucas has a lot less riding on this movie than others have on their movies; he's rich and he really doesn't care what critics think (I recall him saying he doesn't read reviews). He is in no way more likely to be a bastard and fix the reviews of his film than any other person.

      --
      Against stupidity the Gods themselves contend in vain.
    12. Re:Maybe he got it right... by TychoCelchuuu · · Score: 1

      60 Minutes twice isn't Mr. Media. If you ever make a few of the highest grossing films of all time, found Pixar, ILM, and THX, and you only give 2 interviews on 60 Minutes, it's likely you're a bit out of the limelight compared to what others would be.

      --
      Against stupidity the Gods themselves contend in vain.
    13. Re:Maybe he got it right... by CaptainAvatar · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but "twice" isn't "never" either.

      --
      The real Captain Avatar is a fictional character, so I suppose he doesn't mind if I impersonate him.
  11. Star Wars reviews by totallygeek · · Score: 4, Funny
    Everything should be positive about this last film. The film got a bump on the MPAA ratings for violence, which means there will be plenty of action. It shows Natalie Portman preggers, which has been a male fantasy for some time (but men wouldn't watch her in that Wal-Mart movie). And, Jar Jar has very little screen time.

    1. Re:Star Wars reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It shows Natalie Portman preggers, which has been a male fantasy for some time

      Actually, GETTING her that way would probably be more of a fantasy for this crowd...

    2. Re:Star Wars reviews by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 1

      What does "pregnant" have to do with "petrified and covered in hot grits?"

    3. Re:Star Wars reviews by thrillseeker · · Score: 4, Funny
      What does "pregnant" have to do with "petrified and covered in hot grits?"

      Around here, one frequently leads to the other.

    4. Re:Star Wars reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm because um for her to be pregnant means, uh, you know, that she must have huh-huh done it, you know, done IT, and knowing that she did it, makes it more exciting for us geeks who imaging she did it with US, you know, while we are wacking off with one hand holding our Natalie Portman action figure.

    5. Re:Star Wars reviews by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      > wacking off with ... Natalie Portman action figure

      Classy.

      (Looks with curiosity at Leia chained to Jabba figures... nah... )

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    6. Re:Star Wars reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She's giving birth to a cockatrice tater?

    7. Re:Star Wars reviews by dgb2n · · Score: 1

      Somehow the comment about Natalie Portman being pregnant only confirms all of my stereotypes of slashdotters.

      Have any of you actually lived with a pregnant woman???

      Trust me. Its no fantasy.

      I'm not even sure its worth the 2 minute of bliss (be honest folks) that you'd probably last with Natalie ;-)

  12. and... by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1, Troll

    And isn't that just the same as alot of other movies that sucked?

    We live in an era where you can buy anything, including a good review. Then enough people will just go "wow that looks good!" and go see it based on said review so they will make a fortune by paying out a little money.

    I saw a documentry on the series the other day.. and Lucas didn't even start WRITING the story untill most of the sets were at least 75% done.. what kind of director makes hundreds of sets before he even has a story? We all know it'll be the same as the other films. Light sabers every where, Darth spawns, Obi wan and Yoda head for the hills and we'll either see a few Jedi die or it'll just state they died.

    Star wars is star wars... and Lucas is well Lucas..

    --
    I like muppets.
    1. Re:and... by TychoCelchuuu · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I know, what's even worse are those first few movies. Just a few spaceships, Luke discovers the force, shoots a bunch of stormtroopers and blows up a Death Star or two. And Darth's his father. I mean seriosuly, what do people see in these things?

      If you oversimplify to the degree that you did Episode III, you can make anything look stupid. Romea and Juliet is just two lovey-dovey people with a fatal misunderstanding. Indiana Jones is just some archaeologist who beats up Nazis. Episode III is just some saber fights. I mean come on; you know it's more than that.

      --
      Against stupidity the Gods themselves contend in vain.
    2. Re:and... by ajs · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think you're confusing writing the STORY with writing the SCREENPLAY. The story was written in part in the 70s. There are some scenes in this film which were published in magazines in the early 80s (there is one particular major bit with Anakin that I've heard quoted ever since, and it's a major set for ep3). And of course, Lucas almost certainly planned out much of the detail in this film when arcing out 1 and 2 and their tie to 4.

      I would not be shocked to find out that some sets / CG for this film were built before 2 was even done post-production.

      The screenplay for this film is crucial, but don't assume that it was or even should have been the starting point.

    3. Re:and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We live in an era where you can buy anything, including a good review.

      Yes, however it's more than one. Well, we'll see on IMDb soon enough. Although there's a lot of SW fanboys voting there, the score dropped enough for ep 1 & 2 to see something was wrong.

      what kind of director makes hundreds of sets before he even has a story?

      He made the sets to suit his story?
      (it doesn't have to be in paper form to exist)

    4. Re:and... by paranode · · Score: 1
      Romea and Juliet...

      Is that the new politically correct version for the 21st century?

    5. Re:and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Romea and Juliet

      Is that the lesbian porn version of the Shakespear play? :o)

    6. Re:and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Indiana Jones is just some archaeologist who beats up Nazis.
      I see your point on the other ones, but your oversimplification of Indy is still a movie I'd want to see.
    7. Re:and... by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, just what was stupid about episodes 1 and 2, you ask? I invite others to add to the list, or dispute my inclusion of the following:

      1) Anakin grew up on the planet his son later hides on, yeh. So, maybe those Storm Troopers are retards and kill the people raising his son, but even turned to the dark side he feels so little that he doesn't shred the troopers who killed them into hamburger? They're his own relatives, for crying out loud. All GL had to do, was put this on another planet, it's a big universe.

      2) Darth knows the droids, from his childhood? Yeh right. What does this add to the story? All the big story's in humanity's history have room for literally thousands of important people, important players. If they needed some droids (and yeh, they probably did), why not invent some new ones?

      3) Yoda bounces around like a $10 toy from the bratstore? Yoda was supposed to be literally *awesome* if you did piss him off. Not comical. Yoda should have opened his robes, and anywhere from 6-20 lightsabers just levitate outward from him and activate. The bad guy (Darth Brooks? I forget his name) would have to do everything he can to not be mowed down by the cloud of spinning lightsabers biting at him from every side, even the distractions he might throw at Yoda would be smacked away. Let him escape, sure. But make it look like the guy beat the 100,000 to 1 odds in doing so.

      4) Absolutely clueless intrigue. Even the bad guys in both shows would be amateurs when put up against the likes of my local city council. The good guys wouldn't stand a chance against the maternity ward at a hospital. The Jedi have magical powers, dammit, and you're telling me they never even notice a Sith Lord on the same planet as their headquarters? That once they know about him, it's all up to Ewan McGregor to find out what's going on? Aren't there dozens of Jedi, even hundreds (if not thousands). With influence at the highest levels of government?

      5) The big Jedi battle against whatever those things were. They have to be rescued by storm troopers? Mace Windex runs around like a fat man, out of breath, sloppily hacking at things like one of the three stooges would swat at a bee. Some of these Jedi get nailed without ever even seeing it coming. It was so lame. If they can't squash an army that has less than 50 attackers per Jedi, then it's just plain dumb. You get the impression in the first 3 that if the Death Star coughs, Vader will go down to the surface and destroy the damn planet himself. With one arm tied around his back. He might be one of the most powerful ever, but the other Jedis should be with in a few orders of magnitude of that.

    8. Re:and... by WinterSolstice · · Score: 1

      I have to agree with the Yoda/Jedi points; I suspect the idea was that the Jedi had gotten fat, dumb, and lazy. The part that I found worst was that Darth Maul was just about the dumbest villian seen outside of a cereal commercial.

      I liked the whole first part of Ep 1, and some of the stuff from Ep 2. I will see Ep 3 on video, just like Ep 2. However, I think that the rest were totally awesome. Even the new versions. The only "remastering" bits that really bugged were the stupid "bouncing Han" bit with Jabba, and the fact that a civilization capable of holograms and sentient robots had HUDs that came straight from BattleZone.

      -WS

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    9. Re:and... by aglerickson · · Score: 1

      It reminds me of the now classic saw: Yoda: Hard to see, the Dark Side is. Movie watcher: Why? Because it's dark?

    10. Re:and... by gimlix2 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Darth Brooks? I forget his name

      Hey... isn't that the country singer that went to the dark side?

    11. Re:and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Anakin grew up on the planet his son later hides on, yeh. So, maybe those Storm Troopers are retards and kill the people raising his son, but even turned to the dark side he feels so little that he doesn't shred the troopers who killed them into hamburger? They're his own relatives, for crying out loud. All GL had to do, was put this on another planet, it's a big universe.

      Was Owen Anakin's relative? I know he ended up buying Anakin's mom from the Hutt later on... but I don't believe they were related. I believe Owen is only referred to as 'uncle' by Luke, who never really knew is parents and had come to regard Owen and Meru as family.

      2) Darth knows the droids, from his childhood? Yeh right. What does this add to the story? All the big story's in humanity's history have room for literally thousands of important people, important players. If they needed some droids (and yeh, they probably did), why not invent some new ones?,

      If they had invented new droids, and had darth created them, then he should have immediately noticed them in the later trilogy. Having the same appearance as countless other droids provides them some anonyminity. Perhaps the third movie is shot is such a manner than Anakin believes the droids were destroyed... Perhaps the same 'accident' results in the droids memories getting erased... Perhaps Amadalah (sp) keeps the droids to remember Anakin... and perhaps Leia inherits them in her childhood.

      It's too early to say the droids aren't adequately explained. Further, in the 6 movies, the droids are the only constant. They're the background against which Anakin/Vader/Luke thing plays out.

      3) Yoda bounces around like a $10 toy from the bratstore? Yoda was supposed to be literally *awesome* if you did piss him off. Not comical. Yoda should have opened his robes, and anywhere from 6-20 lightsabers just levitate outward from him and activate. The bad guy (Darth Brooks? I forget his name) would have to do everything he can to not be mowed down by the cloud of spinning lightsabers biting at him from every side, even the distractions he might throw at Yoda would be smacked away. Let him escape, sure. But make it look like the guy beat the 100,000 to 1 odds in doing so.

      Yoda can't be so powerful that he can foresee the threat the Emperor poses. Similarly, he can't be so powerful that he can defeat Anakin/Vader in combat in the third movie. Make Yoda as powerful as you'd like him to be, and you'd have to explain while a god-like episode 3 vader is so much less so in the last 3 movies.

      4) Absolutely clueless intrigue. Even the bad guys in both shows would be amateurs when put up against the likes of my local city council. The good guys wouldn't stand a chance against the maternity ward at a hospital. The Jedi have magical powers, dammit, and you're telling me they never even notice a Sith Lord on the same planet as their headquarters? That once they know about him, it's all up to Ewan McGregor to find out what's going on? Aren't there dozens of Jedi, even hundreds (if not thousands). With influence at the highest levels of government?

      Well... you don't have anything like the 'I am your father' line in the first three. The lack of intrigue is largely a product for the first of Lucas' two great weaknesses: a complete inability to write dialog worth the paper it's written on. That aside, the actual idea of how Palpatine takes over isn't too poorly executed. Keep in mind, the people who go to see Star Wars movies aren't going to see a political thriller...

      Is it so difficult to imagine that the one Sith Lord remaining after years of war with the Jedi would be particularly adapt at hiding his presence from them?

      5) The big Jedi battle against whatever those things were. They have to be rescued by storm troopers? Mace Windex runs around like a fa

    12. Re:and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      I've heard endless debate about what's wrong with the prequels, but I think all of those things could easily be overlooked if it had one simple ingredient: at least one cool character.

      Think about this: who was your favourite character in the original Trilogy? Most of you, like me, will say "Han Solo". There may be some other answers, but the key is that you will have an answer.

      Now, who's your favourite character in the new Trilogy? Most of you, like me, will say "um.... uh.... er..." There is not one single "cool" character in the prequel Trilogy. Darth Maul is pretty cool, but relatively meaningless and, of course, only exists in one of the movies. The "heroes" are all Jedi, which is kind of cool, but all Jedi seem to be, by definition, stiff, pretentious, and completely devoid of character. Obi Wan is the exception, but he only barely manages to show the slightest hint of personality.

      The history that Lucas created for the prequels is bad. There's no doubt about that. I still think that Annakin should not have been an immaculately-conceived slave, but rather he should have grown up with Obi Wan, the two being close friends. He should have been a bit of a badass right from the start (maybe he could have been the cool "Han Solo" character of the prequels), and he and Obi Wan should have drifted apart over time. I still like the old idea of Owen being Obi Wan's brother, and I think Beru should have been Annakin's sister (why the hell did she say with such fondness "there's too much of his father in him" in Episode IV, if she never knew Annakin as anything other than the weird angry dude who showed up one day to slaughter Tusken Raiders?).

      But even with the weak back-story that Lucas created, the movies could still have been saved if there had just been one single character that I could actually give a shit about.

    13. Re:and... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      I suspect the idea was that the Jedi had gotten fat, dumb, and lazy.

      Ah, by George I think you've got it - Lucas is using the Prequel Trilogy as an allegory for what happened to the Jedi - assuming the traits the befell the Jedi for himself.

      Now, that's clever and pretty damn selfless.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    14. Re:and... by Lovesquid · · Score: 1

      Was Owen Anakin's relative? I know he ended up buying Anakin's mom from the Hutt later on... but I don't believe they were related. I believe Owen is only referred to as 'uncle' by Luke, who never really knew is parents and had come to regard Owen and Meru as family

      It was explained in "Attack of the Clones" that Owen's dad bought and later freed and married Anakin's mom somewhere between Episode I and Episode II -- hence, Owen is Anakin's step-brother. Thus, Owen is in fact Luke's uncle, if only by marriage.

    15. Re:and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I would not be shocked to find out that some sets / CG for this film were built before 2 was even done post-production

      On the AOTC DVD there are several mini-documentaries about the making of the film. In one of them, Lucas is speaking on the Tunsian desert set for AOTC and mentions that he shot a brief scene for ROTS because he didn't want to go all the way back there just to shot this one particular scene.

    16. Re:and... by evilviper · · Score: 1

      The one that bugged me (and many of my friends) was the inconsistent use of the force. From the very beginning, the two jedi get into a big fight...

      First they spend 10 minutes spinning their light-sabers around, jumping like crazy, all sorts of acrobatics, etc., to finally kill off one droid that was attacking them... *Whew*!!! Then they look at the dozen other droids standing right around them, wave their hands, and they're all destoryed. Really obviously convenient. The force works when it furthers the story line, and doesn't work when that furthers the story. Great...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  13. I'll be watching by s_wardman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, I'll be watching it whether the critics love it or hate it. I like to form my own opinions.

    --
    A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that works.â"John Gaule
    1. Re:I'll be watching by Spacejock · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've seen the original trilogy umpteen times, but I could only watch episodes I and II once each - despite having them both on DVD. I will certainly catch episide III, if only to round out the experience, but it's going to have to be something really special to make me watch it multiple times.

      George Lucas will get my cash so he's not going to be overly bothered. I'll probably wait for the DVD, though.

    2. Re:I'll be watching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like to form my own opinions. ... and George Lucas likes your money.

    3. Re:I'll be watching by Eagle5596 · · Score: 1

      I see you are posting to slashdot now George Lucas... as if "s_wardman" fooled us. It's obvious: s_wardman -> swardman -> sword man -> sabre man -> light sabre man -> jedi Next you'll be telling us that Han Shot First...

  14. Torrent? by Saxton · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, where's the torrent?

    --
    My name is Aaron Landry, and I approve this message.
    1. Re:Torrent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Well, where's the torrent?

      Come now my children, revel in the dark side of the force!

      http://isohunt.com/torrents.php?ihq=star+wars+III& ext=&op=and

      - Darth Emperor AC

    2. Re:Torrent? by arduous · · Score: 3, Funny

      Obi-wan: *waves hand* "You don't want to download the torrent"

      Saxton: "I don't want to download the torrent"

      Obi-wan: *waves hand* "You want to go home and re-think your life"

      Saxton: "I want to go home and re-think me life"

      --
      "It's the smell! If there is such a thing." Agent Smith - The Matrix
    3. Re:Torrent? by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 3, Funny

      * You will give me all your money and then jump into this pit *

      * I will give you all my money and then jump into this pit *

      * Yes, let's jump in the pit, we'll be down faster *

      Kinda pathetic when even a crappy computer game is funnier than the movies it's based on :/

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    4. Re:Torrent? by sallgeud · · Score: 2

      Only the game can be downloaded... many people waiting anxiously for someone to put the movie up.

    5. Re:Torrent? by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

      There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering torrent!

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
  15. Am I the only one that liked the first two? by Enigma_Man · · Score: 1

    I enjoyed them quite a bit. I went to the theaters opening day/night, and the audience cheered and got really into it. It was fun, and enjoyed by all. Even some people in my small town were dressed up as characters.

    -Jesse

    --
    Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    1. Re:Am I the only one that liked the first two? by Jarlsberg · · Score: 1
      I think you'll find that there's a very loud group of people who really hated the movies and who wants to communicate that and take pot shots at George Lucas any time they can.

      Personally, I enjoyed both movies, though there are few scenes in both movies that makes me cringe every time (Jar-Jar, obviously, and any scene with Jar-Jar and his people).

    2. Re:Am I the only one that liked the first two? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Am I the only one that liked the first two?

      Yes.

    3. Re:Am I the only one that liked the first two? by goldspider · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Bravo for standing up and saying what (I'm sure) so many here are thinking, but won't say because it's now chic to bash George Lucas.

      The first two weren't THAT bad! Yes, Jar-Jar got on a lot of peoples' nerves, and the puppy-love scenes in EP2 might have been a little overdone. But overall, I thought they were generally very enjoyable!

      But let's face it; most people here weren't old enough to be movie critics when the original trilogy came out, so they don't really have much perspective. Now that it's fashionable to be jaded, they just can't bring themselves to admit that they actually liked TPM and AotC.

      I for one look forward to seeing RotS, and won't be here sounding off about how George Lucas robbed my life of several hours.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    4. Re:Am I the only one that liked the first two? by shawn443 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree. 7 year olds dig ewoks. One day I got to thinking how come I wanted an ewok so bad 3rd grade was a complete wash with daydreaming, but yet I friggin hate Jar-Jar. Oh, it must be becuase I'm 30 now. I re-watched I & II with the mindset that I was a kid again and you know what, Star Wars rules again.

    5. Re:Am I the only one that liked the first two? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some one might agree with what you say. For the record I don't (and I, the ac, represent the spirit of a lot people out [t]here).

      1 & 2 simply lack all feeling - yes, nice to look here and there but nothing in substance for the viewer!

      4 was simply the strongest stand alone movie. 5 & 6 did actually quite well to continue with the spirit of 4. The actors had a lot to do with this.

      Lucas really flopped with 1 & 2 not simply because of the childish features but also because of the lack of spirit the actors are investing, like Lucas was directing puppets instead of real strong willed actors - with more feeling and spirit from the actors and no jarjar etc. the movies would propably have been adequate to give something extra to the original sw movie trilogy (4,5&6).

      -AC

    6. Re:Am I the only one that liked the first two? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      No, You're not. Despite the bad directing of Episodes 1 & 2, I thought they were much better than 90% of the rest of the crap that came out the same years and will usually rewatch them whenever they're on cable.

      Everybody here just likes to beat up on George because it's the cool, "i'm a 1337 h4x0r penguinista" thing to do.

      In reality they spend 99% of their time locked in their parent's basement drooling over Carrie Fisher in a gold bikini on infinite loop, stroking their lightsaber, and wishing they could have half as much success as Lucas.

    7. Re:Am I the only one that liked the first two? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But they weren't shit. The directing was shit, some (maybe 5-10%) of the dialogue was shit, every other aspect of these movies was the great.

      I think you're deluding yourself if you actually believe a large portion of the the negative remarks towards Episodes I & II aren't just hopping on the Lucas-hating bandwagon.

    8. Re:Am I the only one that liked the first two? by hahiss · · Score: 1

      > Am I the only one that liked the first two?

      No, actuallly you didn't like them either. You're thinking of some other films.

      --
      "Every decent man is ashamed of the government he lives under." - H.L. Mencken
    9. Re:Am I the only one that liked the first two? by hkmwbz · · Score: 1
      "1 & 2 simply lack all feeling - yes, nice to look here and there but nothing in substance for the viewer!"
      Odd. I foud myself loving the way 1 and 2 were foreshadowing things, and they explained things like the Clone Wars, and so on.

      1 and 2 are nice kids flicks on their own. But if you watch them in the context of episode 4-6, you may appreciate them and see beyond the lame acting at times, and other annoyances.

      Oh, and you got to see Natalie Portman's hard nipples.

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    10. Re:Am I the only one that liked the first two? by 93,000 · · Score: 1
      This kind of statement is so pathetic. Just trying to make yourself sound so above it all. Fucking lame.

      With all due indifference to the grandparent post, what's lame is posting AC with such piss and vinegar. Have some balls if you're going to try and talk big.

    11. Re:Am I the only one that liked the first two? by davidwhitney · · Score: 0

      Nah, I thought the first was reasonable and loved the second one.

    12. Re:Am I the only one that liked the first two? by stereoroid · · Score: 1

      I saw Ep 1 again recently (on TV), and quite enjoyed it. Mentally screening out JarJar helped a lot!

      The "wolf in sheep's clothing" nature of the Naboo was interesting - the way the "queen" with the horrible accent was just putting on a show, until the stuff hit the fan and the blasters came out (on the one hand) and Palpatine started taking over (on the other).

      --
      (this is not a .sig)
    13. Re:Am I the only one that liked the first two? by famebait · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The first two weren't THAT bad!

      The second wasn't that bad. The acting was terrible, and a few other things could have been better, but basically it was still a proper Star Wars movie.

      The first was a huge, embarrassing, computer-animated steaming turd from beginning to end (although that last expression is a bit misleading, as it might be construed to imply there was some sense of direction in it), and anyone who doesn't see that is just... just..., well just plain wrong. So there. Glad we cleared that up.

      --
      sudo ergo sum
    14. Re:Am I the only one that liked the first two? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on... Only little girls dig ewoks.....

    15. Re:Am I the only one that liked the first two? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1
      But let's face it; most people here weren't old enough to be movie critics when the original trilogy came out, so they don't really have much perspective. Now that it's fashionable to be jaded, they just can't bring themselves to admit that they actually liked TPM and AotC.

      Ahhh yes - the same old nostalgia excuse Lucas is so fond of. It's not that the new movies suck - it's that people grew up.

      Bull.

      I'm prone to nostalgia too. But I'm not blinded by it. Awhile ago, I started catching eposiodes of favorite shows from my childhood. One of those was the A-Team. My father couldn't understand why I enjoyed the show so much when I was a kid. Now I can not only understand his point of view, but I tend to agree. I enjoy the show for nostalgia's sake. But I do it now with different perspective.

      I also watched the first 3 Star Wars films again. I'm not a rabid Star Wars fanboi. I go for years without watching the trilogy. But when I do catch them - I really do enjoy the movies. Maybe I catch flaws that I didn't see in childhood... but the overall work survives adulthood better than so many of my old childhood favorites.

      And so I watched the newest Star Wars films a couple times. They're disappointing. They lack the spirit of the origional trilogy. I'm not entirely sure why... and I honestly haven't spent the time agonizing over it, myself. But none the less, the new films are simply flat.

      It's fine if you enjoy the the new films; more power to you. But just because you find favor with them, doesn't mean others do.
    16. Re:Am I the only one that liked the first two? by Syphtor · · Score: 1

      Got to agree with you on episode 1, but I do have to point out that I watched Episode 2 twice and I fell asleep both times!

      I thought the first time I watched it I was just very tired, but obviously not. I am looking forward to Episode 4 though, from reading some of the reviews GL has actually listened to some of those nay-sayers and taken on board the constructive criticism. :-)

      Good for him if that's what he's done!

      --
      It's in that place where I put that thing that time
    17. Re:Am I the only one that liked the first two? by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > Am I the only one that liked the first two?

      No. But the other people who liked them don't comment vocally about it in every relevant slashdot thread.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    18. Re:Am I the only one that liked the first two? by nigham · · Score: 1

      Nope. I liked them too. And not just for the improved saber fights and effects. I really admire the way the whole plot has been consistent to the theme of the prequels - the transformation of Anakin Skywalker to Darth Vader. Its a story to chill the heart, and if you know the story of Revenge of the Sith (i.e. if you've read the book) you'll know what a poignant combo the three prequels make.

      In the first movie, you're shown this boy who just "doesn't want to be a problem" being recognized as the chosen one by this enigmatic Jedi who believes more in the living Force than the Jedi Council's directions. We see how strong the Force is with him, and we see the truth of the prophecy.

      In the second movie (which, incidentally, I just finished watching), we are shown the anger and chaos that reigns within Anakin Skywalker, as well as the source of that chaos - love. Love for his mother that he could not fulfil because of duty that ends up making him feel guilty, angry, helpless, suffering and frustrated beyond words. Love for Padme, a love which he is forced to hide in order to continue being a Jedi. We are shown how paradoxically, a possessive love and an inability to let people go can transform into an anger that leads to the brink of the dark side.

      The originial trilogy is still my favourite but you must understand that it is a movie of a hero and a villian - a completely classic plot, extremely well made. The prequels are an attempt to show how the tiniest bit of chaos in an essentially good human being can lead to the making of a monster. And that is far, far harder thing to do than make a movie about a hero who springs out of nowhere and destroys evil. And while the team (why do people only talk about Lucas) has stumbled a bit, overall they've done a wonderful job.

      --
      I don't want to read /. I want to go home and re-think my life.
    19. Re:Am I the only one that liked the first two? by YukonTech · · Score: 0

      I personally did not like the phantom menace, but I did like the http://dir.salon.com/ent/movies/feature/2001/11/05 /phantom_edit/index.htmlphantom edit 1.1. (Which I'm sure there are still live torrents of)

      I found the phantom edit a lot more fluid and less annoying than the phantom menace. Deffinetly worth checking out for anyone who was dissapointed in Ep 1

    20. Re:Am I the only one that liked the first two? by CUGWMUI · · Score: 1
      Ditto here. As someone who enjoyed EP1 and EP2 to quite an extent, it pains me to see Slashdotters (and some others) to criticize the two movies to such an extent.

      Perhaps its the fact that the Slashdot crowd doesn't like the multitude of VHS/DVD/LaserDisc releases of EP4-6 that causes them to hate EP1 and EP2 ? Or is it vice-versa?

      EP2 had a bit too much romance for my taste, and the screenplay did leave me a little confused during the first few minutes.. but at the end of it.. both were enjoyable movies, with plenty of action, CG and fast paced drama.

      One cannot compare them to the sequels, simply because masterpieces are rarely repeated.

      And what is it with people hating Jar Jar Binks so much? I thought he was out of place, but he provided the little element of humour that is absolutely necessary in today's movies.

      My two ${INSERT_CURRENCY_DENOMINATION}

    21. Re:Am I the only one that liked the first two? by Asklepius+M.D. · · Score: 1

      Agreed, the first was horrible because Lucas was busy playing with his CGI toys rather than developing storyline and character depth. Episode II was slightly better, mostly because it had more references to the original trilogy which almost made it feel like it had a plot. Other than that, it was loaded with action gimmicks and emotionless characters. The prequels were supposed to answer all of our questions about how the empire came to power, how Luke and Leia wound up on different worlds (and how Leia got the palace while Luke got a sandbox!) and most of all... What made Anakin into Vader. Episode 1 told us nothing, and was a huge disappointment. Episode 11 gave us a few hints, and filled in the gaps on other stock characters like Boba and Yoda. Episode 111 has potential because Lucas seems to have finally put away his toys and got around to showing us what we've wanted all along........the story behind the saga!

      --
      He who would be a man, must be a nonconformist. -- Emerson
    22. Re:Am I the only one that liked the first two? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that it's fashionable to be jaded, they just can't bring themselves to admit that they actually liked TPM and AotC.

      What astonishing bullshit. Let's see, I can do that too: people who claim to like these films can't bring themselves to admit that they are nothing more than emotionally retarded fan-boys. Most of them look forward to seeing the Next Episode on opening day, and will be here sounding off about how great It was.

    23. Re:Am I the only one that liked the first two? by danila · · Score: 1

      But let's face it; most people here weren't old enough to be movie critics when the original trilogy came out, so they don't really have much perspective.

      Exactly. Being a kid does wonders to your ability to enjoy a film. I mean, I really liked Police Academy. I thought it was brilliant comedy and I even, gasp!... enjoyed Mission to Moscow! Kids just don't have good taste, it's acquired.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    24. Re:Am I the only one that liked the first two? by shawn443 · · Score: 1

      Screw that, if you didn't wan't Wicket. W. Warrick to come bouncing into your tree fort you must have been one of the those naughty children who loved to go genocidal on ants while pretending to be at the helm of the death star.

    25. Re:Am I the only one that liked the first two? by Daetrin · · Score: 1
      The first was a huge, embarrassing, computer-animated steaming turd from beginning to end

      I just watched episode 1 & 2 again over the weekend and i disagree.

      Episode I took a whole ten minutes before it turned into crap. Right up until the point where they ran into JarJar it wasn't bad at all.

      I agree with you on the second one though. It had its problems, but it was certainly watchable. Of course watching it right after Episode I made it seem like a work of art in comparison :)

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    26. Re:Am I the only one that liked the first two? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Now that it's fashionable to be jaded, they just can't bring themselves to admit that they actually liked TPM and AotC.

      No, you're just defensive about the fact that you liked the oh-so-crappy first two episodes, and try to play it as if it's the rest of the world that are crazy.

      30 years is the blink of an eye. What movies are at the top of all the all-time-best lists? Movies that are older than most of the rewievers! Your claims are ridiculous, and you're just looking for any excuse to criticize the rest of the world for not also enjoying the dumbed-down movies you do.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  16. AVOID THOSE TRAILERS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just remember folks, seeing all those trailers just detracts from the movie, so avoid them if you can and the movie will be the better for it.

    The second movie was quite decent for those that did, but I'll bet the humungoid trailers ruined it for most of you.

    1. Re:AVOID THOSE TRAILERS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Actually, in my case it was the reverse. I enjoyed the trailers, which were subsequently ruined by the movie.

  17. Yeah, It's a real shocker... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Harry Knowles gave it a good review... that means it MUST be AMAZING!

    1. Re:Yeah, It's a real shocker... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Insanely great!

      Oops, wrong thread

    2. Re:Yeah, It's a real shocker... by BigBadBus · · Score: 1
      Come off it. Thats the guy who had orgasms watching The Phantom Menace TRAILER!

    3. Re:Yeah, It's a real shocker... by Zutfen · · Score: 1

      'nough said.

      --
      I'm too lazy to enter a sig. Hey wait a second! You tricked me!
  18. Listen by hedge_death_shootout · · Score: 1

    We all know it's going to be shite, but we'll go and see it anyway.

    What's that? Good reviews??! Meesa need a lie down.

  19. Alexandra Dupont by artemis67 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've been reading the reviews, too, with a bit a skepticism... but I liked this one most of all. She's an occasional columnist for AICN, and definitely one of their better and more trustworthy writers. She trashed the last two movies, but this one, well...

    To quote:
    Q. Give us a four-word review.
    A. Bloody hell! It's good!

  20. "Suprisingly Positive" by cobrajs · · Score: 1

    "Suprisingly Positive?" I don't think that Episodes 1 and 2 really crashed and burned did they? I mean, they were on the highest grossing movies list! Who doesn't like Star Wars anyway?

    1. Re:"Suprisingly Positive" by oneiron · · Score: 1

      Episodes 1 and 2 were panned pretty badly by most critics. They definitely weren't great movies... Watchable unless you're a star wars geek having your childhood memories defiled, but not much more than that....

    2. Re:"Suprisingly Positive" by nagora · · Score: 1
      Episodes 1 and 2 were panned pretty badly by most critics. They definitely weren't great movies...

      But then Titanic and LotR were praised to the roof by critics and they were both terrible. Critics? Who cares what they think?

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    3. Re:"Suprisingly Positive" by v01d · · Score: 1

      Critics? Who cares what they think?

      Insecure people in desperate need of external validation?

    4. Re:"Suprisingly Positive" by nagora · · Score: 1
      Insecure people in desperate need of external validation?

      Oh, right. I forgot about them.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    5. Re:"Suprisingly Positive" by oneiron · · Score: 1

      Generally, I don't put much faith in a critic's opinion. I do check out http://www.rottentomatoes.com/ for most movies that I end up seeing, but I typically use the content of the reviews to determine if a movie is to my tastes...ignoring the actual positive/negative result.

      In this context, however, critics happen to be the main topic of conversation according to the story that was submitted. So, naturally, I made a reference to critics in my response.

  21. This is going to be a long, pointless discussion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go on talk about what someone said that others said.

  22. lucas lost his chance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the original three were great. I saw episode I and I was thoroughly disappointed. Because of it, I haven't seen #2, and I don't plan on seeing #3. Lucas lost his chance to make many of us fans again.

    1. Re:lucas lost his chance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      im sure george lucas feels the pain of your rejection..

    2. Re:lucas lost his chance by TychoCelchuuu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      He has to make you fans again? What, just because he stops making movies for a while means you revert to your Pre-Star Wars stage and aren't a fan anymore? That's silly. If anything, you would be a fan from the first three he made, revert to normal person once hating Episode I, then see Episode II to see if he wins you back. Episode I shouldn't be his attempt to win you back, since there was nothing to disenchant you with the magic of Star Wars before that. Unless you didn't like the Special Editions or something but you don't need to bother seeing those.

      --
      Against stupidity the Gods themselves contend in vain.
    3. Re:lucas lost his chance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well you could argue howard the duck could have turned us off of lucas

    4. Re:lucas lost his chance by strikethree · · Score: 1

      Actually, RoTJ was nowhere near as enchanting as the first two. it was Star Wars though, so I enjoyed it, but Epsidode I should have been an attempt to win me back.

      strike

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    5. Re:lucas lost his chance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      revert to normal person once hating Episode I

      This is where you err. George Lucre sunk into the negatives here, so there is no "revert to normal". He has a lot of work to do to get me back to "normal", where I'd accept a new movie from him at face value.

    6. Re:lucas lost his chance by Potor · · Score: 1

      i was gonna write a post about how perhaps jedi let the side down, but in hindsight, i think you are right. there was no reason to not like lucas until episode I. but what a reason!

  23. Are we sure that.... by millahtime · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Are we sure that there wasn't a ghost writer on this one? ESB is that best and wasn't written by Lucas. Or, maybe he just learn to write this time around. Either way, I have read that it's damn good and can't wait to see it the minute it opens.

    1. Re:Are we sure that.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as the books go, the Star Wars is the best. (the book was titled Star Wars, I don't know what it's called now)

      Alan Dean Foster wrote it, but George Lucas is on the cover as the author.
      The other books that are good are Splinter of the Mind's Eye, also by Foster, and the three Han Solo novels by Brian Daley.
      All the other Star Wars books that I've read (probably 10 or 15) are pretty much mass produced junk. So I quit reading them.

    2. Re:Are we sure that.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Either way, I have read that it's damn good and can't wait to see it the minute it opens.

      Another victim falls to the market forces.

      Ha ha. Pathetic.

    3. Re:Are we sure that.... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      I saw Lucas about 3 weeks ago at CIII. He elaberated on his problems with EpI and EpII as being the character development portion of a story. Something he never liked to do and wasn't very good at it. Unfortainatly it was his baby and he didn't want to give it up. Now that the development is out of the way he can go back into the putting these people into situations and playing it out. The parts he was good at.

      If you check EpIV-VI there realy isn't any character introduction. They are dropped right into situations, and develop. The introductions are left to reading between the lines.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    4. Re:Are we sure that.... by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      "Are we sure that there wasn't a ghost writer on this one? ESB is that best and wasn't written by Lucas. Or, maybe he just learn to write this time around. Either way, I have read that it's damn good and can't wait to see it the minute it opens."

      You can get the e-book of the official script already (on amazon) and if you take a look it's clear by the dialogue that it's old george at the helm, or that he's been replaced by a medicore fan fiction author, I can never quite tell.

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    5. Re:Are we sure that.... by djSpinMonkey · · Score: 2, Informative
      Are we sure that there wasn't a ghost writer on this one?

      Quite the contrary, we're sure that there is. The fact that Lucas had the sense to get one of the best dialogue writers of the last fifty years to write his movie for him is the main reason I have any hope for it.

    6. Re:Are we sure that.... by Clock+Nova · · Score: 1

      Except that most of the reviewers, even the ones who praised it glowingly, acknowledge that the dialogue is pretty damn bad in some places, particularly any scene involving love.

      --
      There they were, sitting in the van with all those dials, and the cat was dead. -V. Marchetti, CIA
    7. Re:Are we sure that.... by ninjagin · · Score: 1
      Yunno, it didn't occur to me until you said it, but the character development of Anakin was exactly what I found so irritating. The Anakin backstory in EpI was just so kidsy, and the subsequent adolescense of Anakin in EpII was so racked with stereotypical teen angst -- it was just more maudlin than I could take.

      That said, it was still quite interesting to see the evolution of obi-wan and get a better feel for who the jedi were, generally, in both EpI and EpII.

      --
      .. pa-ra-bo-la, pa-ra-bo-la, 2 pi R, 2 pi R, where's your latus rectum, where's your latus rectum, 2 pi R
  24. The whole story. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Do you want to know what the whole story, the whole character arc, of Anakin Skywalker is? Here it is, in a nutshell:

    JESUS GROWS UP TO BE HITLER.

    Search your feelings, you know it to be true.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:The whole story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He makes the trains run on time?

    2. Re:The whole story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you really want to use an analogy like this, I think that

      Jesus to Himmler

      would be more appropriate for his Holocaust role, or even

      Jesus to Rommel

      for the overall competency and redemption / assassination attempt part. Check 'em out on wikipedia. I think we can safely choose Palps as the head guy.

    3. Re:The whole story. by badfish99 · · Score: 1

      That was Mussolini.

    4. Re:The whole story. by mr_snarf · · Score: 1

      Gee thanks for ruining it for me :(

      --
      printf("Goodbye cruel world!\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b");
    5. Re:The whole story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it isn't even true. The trains were at least as late in Italy when Mussolini was in power.

    6. Re:The whole story. by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Ok.. Just because the Council misunderstood the prophecy and failed to realize that they were unbalancing the force. and that the dark forces/sith lords must ascend before the balance can be restored.. doesn't make Vader a completely bad guy.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
  25. Translation: by Doktor+Memory · · Score: 1

    "This time, Lucas decided to spend some of the budget on review plants and astroturf."

    --

    News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters? Like hell.

    1. Re:Translation: by goldspider · · Score: 1

      Grow up.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
  26. Something to complain about by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Informative

    Bai Ling (Senator Bana Breemuwas cut from SW3 because she did a Playboy Spread [NSFW]

    1. Re:Something to complain about by CrusadeR · · Score: 1

      That scene was cut over a year ago - it was mentioned in the Making of ROTS book published in March; moreover, Lucas' daughter was in the same scene and it was still cut:

      http://theforce.net/latestnews/story/Lucas_Respond s_To_Bai_Lings_Claim_92024.asp

      --
      :wq
    2. Re:Something to complain about by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      Well if we complain loud enough, maybe she'll be put back in a future Special Edition!

    3. Re:Something to complain about by TychoCelchuuu · · Score: 1

      Is that the reason? She wasn't cut for any of the zillions of billions of other reasons why things get cut from movies? Did they reshoot her scence without her?

      I'd like to see where you learned why she was cut; it's possible she's just looking for reasons to blame people or something.

      --
      Against stupidity the Gods themselves contend in vain.
    4. Re:Something to complain about by TheHonestTruth · · Score: 1
      Congratulations on the most clicked-through slasdot post ever.

      -truth

      --

      I had a steady B+ in my AI class until I failed the Turing test...

    5. Re:Something to complain about by sydb · · Score: 1

      Goodness me, Playboy is better than I remember it. Just for a second, those pics made me want to go and work out. Then the feeling passed. Mmmm food.

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
  27. Watched it on sunday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Firstly I hated the episode one, episode two was alright. So I wasnt expecting much. This one was great, I enjoyed every bit, theres a constant dark undertone to the whole film which is whats been missing from the first two. Go and see it.

    I wont tell you how it ends...

    1. Re:Watched it on sunday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I wont tell you how it ends...

      Darn!

      The anticipation will kill me! I will just have to make up my own ending...

      Lessee... Anakin is nearly killed by Obi Wan, but miraculously rescued and turns into a cyborg known as Dart Vader. Bunch of Jedi knights are killed and darkness comes over the galaxy. Yoda flees to a remote swamp planet and Obi Wan hides Anakin's son to a desert planet with a couple of bots. Oh, and OW dies at the end. Yeah.

      I hope I won't be awfully disappointed when I see the movie. It would suck so hard.

    2. Re:Watched it on sunday by crimson30 · · Score: 1

      episode two was alright

      Well, there goes your credibility.

  28. How the begining of the Saga Ending begins: by slapout · · Score: 5, Funny

    ---Spoiler Warning---

    Obi-Wan walks into a room full of toys and video games. Anakin is playing Super Mario Brothers.

    Obi: "Where did you get all this stuff!"

    Ana: "I've been using the force like you taught me."

    Obi: "You stole all this stuff?!"

    Ana: "Of course not."

    Obi: "Then what did you do?"

    Ana: "I used the force to see into the future..."

    Obi: "And....?"

    Ana: (Looking down at the floor. Knowing he's in trouble) "...and....and...I used it to find the winning numbers in the Naboo Lottery...."

    Obi: "Anakin!"

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
    1. Re:How the begining of the Saga Ending begins: by Gerad · · Score: 1

      How the beginning begins? Is this yet another fine piece of work from the Department of Redundancy Department? ;)

      On a more serious work, I love the little skit. I can completely see it, too.

      --
      Be the Ultimate Ninja! Play Billy Vs. SNAKEMAN today!
  29. "Faster, more intense!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lucas is a great director.

    HA! Mod parent funny!

  30. *raises hand* by Moraelin · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Well, I wasn't planning to see Episode 3, and gave Episode 2 a skip too. Admittedly, it wasn't because of reviews, but (A) because of Episode 1, (B) because I'm not a big SW fan anyway, and (C) because they released the Episode 3 video game before the movie. Which neatly gives away the whole story. Gotta wonder what were they smoking there.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:*raises hand* by CPUGuy · · Score: 1

      Guess what, the book, oddly enough, gives away the entire story as well...
      WTF were they thinking?

    2. Re:*raises hand* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're new here, aren't you?

      ANYONE who's ever been interested in Star Wars knew the story. Anakin falls to the dark side, Obi-wan knocks him into lava so he gets the suit, Luke and Leia are born, Obi-wan and Yoda disappear to distant planets. The rest is really just details. This isn't exciting because no one knows what's going to happen, it's exciting because we DO know what, but we want to see *HOW*.

    3. Re:*raises hand* by Moraelin · · Score: 4, Informative

      "ANYONE who's ever been interested in Star Wars knew the story. Anakin falls to the dark side, Obi-wan knocks him into lava so he gets the suit, Luke and Leia are born, Obi-wan and Yoda disappear to distant planets. The rest is really just details. This isn't exciting because no one knows what's going to happen, it's exciting because we DO know what, but we want to see *HOW*."

      Bingo. That's the whole thing.

      I knew that Anakin was gonna turn to the dark side ever since the original trilogy. I didn't know how or why.

      After playing the video game, I know exactly how and why. And, while trying not to go into any explicit spoilers, let's say it was a bit... not what I expected, and it puts Episodes 4 to 6 in a very different light too.

      So trust me, when I say the video game gives away the story, I don't mean just "it tells you that Anakin falls to the dark side, falls in the lava and gets a cool black suit." It gives away a helluva lot more.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    4. Re:*raises hand* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      (C) because they released the Episode 3 video game before the movie. Which neatly gives away the whole story. Gotta wonder what were they smoking there.

      Uh... you do realize the story has been known for decades, don't you?!

      That's like complaining about not seeing The Return of the King cause somebody already wrote a book about it and it was released before the movie.

      Gotta wonder what were they [sic] smoking there.

    5. Re:*raises hand* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be quite young.

      I've found that it's the 'little bitch' types that later wield their empires around, stomping on whoever they can. All in retribution for being stuffed in a locker too many times when they were young.

    6. Re:*raises hand* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmmm... good point I suppose. I guess I'll have to wait and see if he makes a good transition to badass or not.

  31. Akbar by ajakk · · Score: 0

    It's a trap!

    1. Re:Akbar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha

  32. Hopefully with a small thermonuclear device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Failing that, maybe Jar Jar dies an excruciatingly painful death.

    1. Re:Hopefully with a small thermonuclear device by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      At the last minute, he kills Palpatine, gets a nose job and takes over as Emperor. It's a secret plot twist for everyone who thought they knew what was going to happen.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  33. Will Lucas remake eps 4, 5 and 6? by 91degrees · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The lightsaber combat in eps 4, 5 and 6 especially seem a little lacklustre compared with the excitement of the big fight in episode 1. And the whole look of the series just jars a little when you have part 4 made 20 years before part 1 and really looking 20 years older even with the lick of paint for the special edition.

    Add to that the fact that Lucas clearly changed his mind a few times about where the story was going, with Leia suddenly becoming Luke's sister (and I'm not even convinced that Obi wan's lie about Darth Vader killing Luke's father was originally meant to be a lie), it would make some sort of sense.

    And then the guy can stop fiddling with the original trilogy, and "tell the story he originally wanted to tell".

    1. Re:Will Lucas remake eps 4, 5 and 6? by CrazyTalk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not sure how tongue in cheek your comment was, but I actually agree with it - Lucas should have left well enough alone with the much-beloved original trilogy, and just done a complete remake of eps 4-6 if he wasnt happy with them. After all, its nearly 30 years since the original Star Wars, and we are already seeing other remakes from the same era like "The Longest Yard" and "Amityville Horror"

    2. Re:Will Lucas remake eps 4, 5 and 6? by xtracto · · Score: 1

      hehe, this is something I was thinking about all this new trend to make prequels of movies from the past... It seems that in some way the people from the movies, their technology and overall infraestructure became worse over time, after you see Batman Forever (which thime is before the original batman) custome, you wonder what happened to him after... also with Starwars, you see the first (or last 3...) movies and then you see Episode 1, and 2 and the technology is sooo darn cool! (robots, etc) and you ask, what happened??.

      I think this sucks, and it is caused by the urge of film houses to get the last pennie possible from a franchise... people had run out of ideas, so just get an old idea and exploit it again...

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    3. Re:Will Lucas remake eps 4, 5 and 6? by stupidfoo · · Score: 1

      Return of Jedi was on tv (TNT I think) a couple days ago. Man those speeder bike scenes really suck now. Back in the day you really had the strong belief that they really were going through the trees at a high rate of speed. Now it just looks like a really bad green screen.

    4. Re:Will Lucas remake eps 4, 5 and 6? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " (and I'm not even convinced that Obi wan's lie about Darth Vader killing Luke's father was originally meant to be a lie)"

      I think it was pretty much planned that Vader was his father - vader is very close to "Vater" which is german for father.

    5. Re:Will Lucas remake eps 4, 5 and 6? by Slider451 · · Score: 1

      If you don't pay so much attention to the bikes you can get the feeling that you are going through the trees at a high rate of speed. If you can suspend disbelief enough to believe in space dogfights, complete with sounds and divebombing, you should forgive the cartoony speeder bikes.

      The bike chase scene is an example of why Star Wars is great. It took many familiar elements (big trees, motorcycles, cocky bike cops, gravity) and created a (mostly) believable, thrilling SF action scene.

      --
      Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
    6. Re:Will Lucas remake eps 4, 5 and 6? by Peldor · · Score: 1

      If we're lucky he'll remake Eps 1 & 2. Maybe with even better effects and less suck.

    7. Re:Will Lucas remake eps 4, 5 and 6? by Slider451 · · Score: 1

      I remember watching a making-of special on ESB in 1980 where Lucas pretty much says the decision was made after ANH.

      --
      Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
    8. Re:Will Lucas remake eps 4, 5 and 6? by ThisIsFred · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I spotted the problem right away when I first saw the film in '83: There's no air movement when the bikes go by. Other than that, I thought they did a pretty believable job. Most green screen work is easy to pick out because of the edges around the actor, or differences in lighting.

      --
      Fred

      "A fool and his freedom are soon parted"
      -RMS
    9. Re:Will Lucas remake eps 4, 5 and 6? by XSforMe · · Score: 1

      just done a complete remake of eps 4-6 if he wasnt happy with them

      OMG... I hope you are kidding about this. At this point we have purist complaining who shoots first, added scenes and edited dialogs. Had George chosen to do deeper surgery on the original trilogy, I can imagine him receiving death threats and at least one suicidal bombing in his general proximity.


      --
      My other OS is the MCP!
    10. Re:Will Lucas remake eps 4, 5 and 6? by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      you didnt read (or grok) the whole comment. My point was that he could have left the originals ALONE, and done all of his experimenting, added scenes, etc. on a ground-up remake.

    11. Re:Will Lucas remake eps 4, 5 and 6? by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      The lightsaber combat in eps 4, 5 and 6 especially seem a little lacklustre compared with the excitement of the big fight in episode 1

      There is actually a good reason for that. In episodes I-III the Jedi are well trained, at the height of their power. In the later episodes, the only Jedi left are an old man, a cripple, and a half-trained youth.

    12. Re:Will Lucas remake eps 4, 5 and 6? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Not tongue in cheek. Also I'm not totally sure it's a good idea, but I did think it was worth suggesting.

    13. Re:Will Lucas remake eps 4, 5 and 6? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't be like that though. Have you seen the remake of Psycho? Most people haven't because it was so poor a remake that people only remember the original. Oceans 11 was good enough that people see the remake as the definitive version.

      A special edition involves fooling around with something we know and love. Unless it's really improved people are going to feel it's a desecration. A remake will live or die on its own merits. The creator can do whatever they like, but the fans will know they can always go back to the original.

    14. Re:Will Lucas remake eps 4, 5 and 6? by gaspyy · · Score: 1

      I saw the original trilogy a weeks ago to refresh my memory.

      Yes, the first lightsaber combat (in ep.IV) is definitely poorly choreographed. While Obi-Wan may have been old and rusty, there's no excuse for Vader.

      I'm pretty sure that the whole father & sister stuff was added in ESB. In ANH there's no hint that Vader feels anything when he confronts Leia, he's clearly trying to kill Luke, and so on.

      Lucas thought about a trilogy only after the success of Star Wars. Now he's trying to make all the pieces of the puzzle fit together and it ain't easy...

    15. Re:Will Lucas remake eps 4, 5 and 6? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      The lightsaber combat in eps 4, 5 and 6 especially seem a little lacklustre compared with the excitement of the big fight in episode 1.

      Well, yeah, they would. In the prequels, there were armies of Jedi and Sith warriors who had trained in lightsaber combat since they were children. The skill levels would have been expectedly high.

      By the time we get to the "classic" trilogy, the Jedi are all but extinct. Who we're left with is an old man who's spent 20 years hiding from Empire death squads, a sullen neophyte who didn't begin training until adulthood, and a cyborg who lost much of the organic body he originally honed his skills with. It makes sense that they wouldn't be quite as skillful as their predecessors.

      (Oh yeah... SPOILER ALERT)

    16. Re:Will Lucas remake eps 4, 5 and 6? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Yeah.. it makes sense... But it's not as cool!

    17. Re:Will Lucas remake eps 4, 5 and 6? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      It works as an explanation, but still... There's no reason this had to be the case. After all, as far as I can see, the real reason was that 1970's audiences hadn't really experienced the fast paced combat sequences we're used to these days.

    18. Re:Will Lucas remake eps 4, 5 and 6? by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Yes, the first lightsaber combat (in ep.IV) is definitely poorly choreographed. While Obi-Wan may have been old and rusty, there's no excuse for Vader.

      The REAL reason is that the lightsaber prop would have broken if they fought any more vigorously.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
  34. Previews by BigNumber · · Score: 4, Funny

    The previews for this movie look very good. Unfortunately, they'll probably let Hayden Christiansen actually speak and that will ruin the movie. The action was fine in both of the prequels so far, it was the god-awful script and acting that made me want to repeatedly stab my brain with an ice-pick.

    1. Re:Previews by rpillala · · Score: 1

      Dude you're thinking of Basic Instinct.

      --
      When the axe came to the forest, the trees said, "Look out - the handle was once one of us."
  35. Amazing what happens ... by Devlin-du-GEnie · · Score: 1

    ... when you hire someone who can write.

    Rumor has it that Lucas hired a ghost screenwriter for this one. I'll bet that's a huge part of the difference.

    That said, I'm not paying to see Episode III. Episode I was an insult and I hold a grudge.

  36. You're just weak-minded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And fell for the Jedi mind trick.

  37. Nothing but content by afchacke · · Score: 3, Informative

    There is a version of the article with just the content, no snazzy graphics.

    Content is king.

  38. ok so its cool to like it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thanks, just checking.

  39. Director by solarlux · · Score: 1

    I'm confused... did Lucas hire someone else to direct Episode III???

  40. Directors... by shoptroll · · Score: 1

    If my limited knowledge of the original trilogy is correct, didn't Lucas only direct the first move (A New Hope)?

    I don't see how people expected the new trilogy to match the highs of the original trilogy, notably The Empire Strikes Back.

    --
    Insert Sig Here
  41. Jar Jar No-sa In It. by bbzzdd · · Score: 1

    I read the book and have been following the insider info. Jar Jar is only in one brief scene with zero dialog.

    1. Re:Jar Jar No-sa In It. by gjbivin · · Score: 1

      Does the scene involve explosive decompression?

  42. Pfft. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    That was Il Duce. Can't you even get your mid-20th century dictators straight?

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  43. What is the intended order? by nearlygod · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Once you have all 6 movies on DVD will you watch them in the order that they are released on in the order that they are numbered? I contend that the 4-6 should always come before 1-3 because I don't want to know that Darth Vader is Luke's father, etc. I think that they should still be viewed in the released order or else the mystery will be lost, however most of my friends disagree with this notion. It would be like watching half of The Godfather II and then watching original Godfather beofre going back to the rest of II.

    --
    The Tools Of Ignorance wanna be a tool?
    1. Re:What is the intended order? by Monkey-Man2000 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It would be like watching half of The Godfather II and then watching original Godfather beofre going back to the rest of II.

      Which is not uncommon.

      --
      This post was generated by a Cadre of Uber Monkeys for Monkey-Man2000 (603495).
    2. Re:What is the intended order? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I think it's best to do the same as works well with some authors, notably Bujold's Vorkosigan series:

      First time, read/watch in the order they were *made*.

      Second time, read/watch in chronological order.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    3. Re:What is the intended order? by Goo.cc · · Score: 1

      Don'y worry, it will still be a mystery to Luke.

  44. BBC by rune.w · · Score: 3, Informative
  45. it was going ok,.... by joper90 · · Score: 1

    the review was going ok.. until i read:

    "My life partner saw some footage from The Duel and said it looked like the Burning of Atlanta from "Gone with the Wind," only with lightsabers, and that sounds about right."

    I hate that word.. life partner.

    1. Re:it was going ok,.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so do i.

      however, when gays cant get married legally in most regions of the united states, you can't fault someone for wanting to validate the seriousness of the relationship. especially, when they can't refer to their life partner as their husband or wife.

      and yea, im gay, but i call my boyfriend, my boyfriend. hopefully later on in life, my husband.

    2. Re:it was going ok,.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A homosexual man can get legally married in any jurisdiction in the United States, if he can find a woman that's willing to marry him.

    3. Re:it was going ok,.... by NaruVonWilkins · · Score: 1

      You can't, given by the fact that you're here. Why not open up the other half of the field? You might have a better chance.

    4. Re:it was going ok,.... by AussieVamp2 · · Score: 0

      hate life?

      that Dark Side sure is seductive, ain't it....

  46. It's all about the Vader by jtpalinmajere · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I actually liked the first two movies... the dialogue wasn't exactly mind blowing... even dull at times... but they were still very entertaining by and large. However, I have a feeling that, story aside, if Darth Vader had been in the first two movies I think they would have gotten a much bigger reception. All of the original trilogy had Vader in it in all his 3V1L L337 coolness, and all three of them were very good... the third only dropping off mildly from the first two.

    Now that Vader is finally coming back onto the screen he has everybody fawning again. I have a sinking suspicion that the dialogue and acting is going to be similar to that of these last two movies (essentially what makes them 'horrible' in many people's eyes), but its got Lord Vader... so it's AAAAALLLLLL good. My $0.02.

    1. Re:It's all about the Vader by aelbric · · Score: 1

      Amen brother!

      The last two were passable, but this one.... My heart is going to skip a beat when the villain of all villains finally takes the screen again. If this has echoes of ESB, it should be all good.

      My only criticism is that I wish it had been called "Rise of the Empire". Just my preference.

      --
      nos laetus epulor qui would domito nos
    2. Re:It's all about the Vader by kongstad · · Score: 1

      I have a sinking suspicion that the dialogue and acting is going to be similar to that of these last two movies (essentially what makes them 'horrible' in many people's eyes)

      Well yes - a movie with bad dialogue and acting - wouldn't that in itself suggest that it perhaps is not so great?

      IMHO it wasn't only the dialogue and acting, but the plot, the filming, and the direction that was bad.

      But besides that they were fine ;) /Soren

    3. Re:It's all about the Vader by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      Nice title. He feels the need to be so damn formulaic. He wants to subtitle ep4? Big deal, it wasn't even a bad one. But Attack of the Clones? So, so lame.

      What would you have called ep5, if it had been your call? (And assuming you weren't so embarrassed that you wouldn't have anything to do with it)

    4. Re:It's all about the Vader by Goo.cc · · Score: 1

      To me, Lucas messed up the first two movies in 3 key ways:

      1. Jar Jar's role should have been limited to Naboo, as Jar Jar contributes nothing to the story when off Naboo. (Personally, I think Lucas put Jar Jar in solely to showcase what ILM can do.)

      2. Anakin should have been older, fourteen ot sixteen, in EP1. Old enough to have the hots for Amidala, and maybe even fall in love with her. This would have reduced the demands to create a relationship from whole cloth in EP2.

      3. Midiclorins

    5. Re:It's all about the Vader by dcam · · Score: 1

      I always said that title was one word away from a B grade sci fi movie: "Attack of the killer clones".

      --
      meh
  47. No, I liked them as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I liked the first two.

    The were as good as the rest which is to say, decent action, space opera movies.

    Watch out though, you may get modded down unless you insult Lucas soon.

  48. Fool me once, shame on you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fool me thrice, shame on me.

    meh

    Anyway, I'm really looking forward to Xmen 3. The first two were absolutely outstanding. The first one has it's own special flavor; what got me was the, "I've heard these arguments, before." Ouch! Ouch!

    The second one, with that hot naked model chick (Mystique) taking over the entire dam, and injecting iron (yeah I know, iron toxicity, but it was still a good plot device) into the guard, allowing Magneto to escape.

    Whoever in the fuck's been doing the Xmen series is the new George Lucas. Maybe one day he'll redo these Star Wars films into something halfway decent. At least we have the "story" to guide another try. It's not a bad story, really. It's a good idea, and it could have worked.

    Just...uh...not the way it's been done...

    1. Re:Fool me once, shame on you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The screenplays were written by David Hayter, who is also the voice of Solid Snake in the Metal Gear Solid series. No, seriously.

  49. Final TRILOGY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You guys are so silly. Isn't he going to make the third trilogy? I mean, come on, every 14 year old around here knows that! And if you read it on the internet it MUST be true.

  50. Cough, but I beg to differ... by Stonewolf57 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    To the author of this article:
    Finally got it right? So it somehow seems that George messed up some critical point in the original three? I think an obssessed legion of fanatical Lucas zealots and Star Wars freaks would beg to differ with that statement. Aside from that, yeah the Phantom Menace wasn't so great. Jar Jar Binks was incredibly annoying (can they please, PLEASE KILL HIM this movie? I'd love to see Jar Jar's fricking head get lopped off with a lightsaber; hell I'd pay money just to see that one scene by itself) and was far to prominent in the movie, but Attack of the Clones was pretty good. Particularly the end battle scene in the arena, and Yoda stepping up to the plate againest Count Dooku were particularly good. Personal opinion: take your opinion and shove it pal. With the exception of Phantom Menace I've liked all the movies, and I don't doubt Revenge of the Sith will be great as well.

    1. Re:Cough, but I beg to differ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't say Yoda vs Dooku was good. I actually thought it wasn't bad, until Yoda started bouncing around like a hairy green rubber ball.

    2. Re:Cough, but I beg to differ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Attack of the Clones was pretty good. Particularly the end battle scene in the arena,

      You are an idiot...AoC was horrendous, it only managed to be slightly better than PM b/c it didn't have as much Jar Jar. The "you break my heart everytime you leave the room" dialogue, the obviously fake looking legions of CGI bots, and the ridiculous arena scene you mention where they are about to be eaten by giant kitty cats in some spaced out rip of Gladiator.

      take your opinion and shove it pal

      I would advise you to do the same, but you might wind up hitting yourself in the eye, as its clear where your head is stuck.

    3. Re:Cough, but I beg to differ... by Stonewolf57 · · Score: 1

      Gee, I notice I'm not the one lacking the balls post with my actual name. Yes, the dialog was corny in places, but who the hell is looking at the cgi characters in the background. Watch the fucking movie and quit whing. I swear some people are never happy with anything. Quit whining jerkoff.

    4. Re:Cough, but I beg to differ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Stonewolf is your name? Wow, that does make you brave. It would be difficult to go through life like that. Corny in places? No, corny all over. The movie fucking sucked, and the CGI was all over the place, dipshit. Foreground, background, e.t.c.

      You brave jedi, you.

    5. Re:Cough, but I beg to differ... by Stonewolf57 · · Score: 1

      Wow, you've proved yourself one of the stoopid l773. You can't argue any better than that? Fucking pathetic what are our grade schools are turning out these days. Go work for Microsoft when you grow up. You'll fit in perfectly.

    6. Re:Cough, but I beg to differ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      work for m$? wow, cool, I'll be rich. The "stoopid" one is the little junior pissant with no reasoning skills, who loves a piece of crap movie with some of the worst dialogues and plot lines ever. keep trying fanboy(fangirl?), when you grow up you'll maybe develop the ability to fire off more than one synapse at once and when that day comes, then just maybe, you'll realize how outclassed you are by everyone around you. that is, everyone who posses the mental capacity beyond your average paramecium. yes indeedy, you are a pathetic loser.

  51. Jedi is a official religion in the UK by MxReb0 · · Score: 1

    " Go figure... maybe Georgie got it right finally."

    I highly highly doubt it, even if Anakin does kill Jar-Jar in an extremely violent way. I will never allow my children to see Eps. 1 & 2. They really ruined something I used to hole sacrosanct. I do not accept them anymore than I accept Data's retarded brother, B4. I'll see the new movie and hope it's good, but don't get my hopes up. I sure hope they don't mention metaclorians.

    --

    MAKE YOUR TIME
    1. Re:Jedi is a official religion in the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, yet another fuckwad that bases his life on fucking Star Wars. If I hear another geek claim that the new movies have ruined their childhood memories I will fucking hurt someone.

      PS. The first 3 movies all sucked too, save for Harrison Ford's acting.

    2. Re:Jedi is a official religion in the UK by Rinzai · · Score: 1

      Hole sacrosanct?

      HOLE?

      And it's...midichlorians.

      While you're not taking your children to see Episodes 1 & 2, maybe you could spend some time...

      ...wait for it...

      PROOFREADING?

  52. 3 good Star Wars movies by SamSeaborn · · Score: 1
    Hopefully that means there will be 3 good Star Wars movies:

    Eps 3, 4, 5

    The rest were stinkers.

    Sam

  53. It's Called... by wickedj · · Score: 1

    Lowered Expectations... You make three interesting movies, with one being exceptional (Empire). Then a few decades later say it was incomplete and release a crappy prequel. Then follow it up with another crappy prequel, getting your fans all desensitized and wanting something remotely good. Expectations get lowered enough that the next prequel you put out is supercalifragilisticexpialidocious.

  54. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  55. Probably not by paranode · · Score: 5, Funny
    But there will be a lot of Slashdotters who will get on the soap box and get modded up telling you how they boycotted Episodes I and II yet at the same time those movies raped their childhood. Oh and they won't see Episode III out of principle, even though they have tickets to the midnight showing and plan to see it again the next day.

    Also they cry themselves to sleep at night holding their pillows moaning "Han shoots first!"

    1. Re:Probably not by jonsequeira · · Score: 2, Funny

      Episode III may be disappointing but I hear the next one, "A New Hope", is going to be great!

    2. Re:Probably not by NaruVonWilkins · · Score: 1

      I saw episode one, didn't bother with two, and I may go see three if the reviews are good enough. I think I'm representative of non-obsessive adult geeks.

    3. Re:Probably not by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1
      Raining shrimp
      On April 28, it apparently rained shrimp onto the tennis courts at the Summit residential development in La Jolla, California. According to Scripps Institution of Oceanography curator Bob Burhans, the shrimp were likely sucked up by the wind and dropped over land. (More background on the Fortean phenomena of weird rains here.) From the San Diego Union-Tribune:
      "There were warnings of potential sea spouts a couple of hours before that storm came in," says Burhans, adding that a sea spout can travel a mile or two, or even farther.
      Link
      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    4. Re:Probably not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One slight change:

      Most of them cry themselves to sleep at night holding their pillows and moaning "Han's Hot First"

      It's a subtle difference from "Han Shot First" but important. While "Han Shot First" refers to Han Solo firing at Greedo, "Han's Hot First" is a well known gay pornographic movie produced about Star Wars starring Harrison Ford and The Gimp from Pulp Fiction.

      Taco: "Han's Hot First! Han's Hot First!"
      Bride of Taco: "At least he is rich..."

    5. Re:Probably not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention - if you consider all of the budding Slashdot directors/writers/actors and actresses out there - who, when it comes to Star Wars, respond as if they've just had pigshit rammed up their nostrils - sure seem to enjoy talking about it..

      Go figure.

  56. Re:and... that makes no sense. by webslacker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If Lucas could easily buy good reviews, he would've bought good reviews for the last two prequels too.

  57. Optimistic Crackpot Theory by Apreche · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have an optimistic crackpot theory. I'll write it in PHP because that's what I'm using mostly as of late.

    if( in_array( 'Darth Vader', $movie ) ){
    return awesome;
    }else{
    return poop;
    }

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    1. Re:Optimistic Crackpot Theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if( in_array( 'Darth Vader', $movie ) ){
      return awesome;
      }else{
      return poop;
      }


      if( in_array( 'code', $post ) ){
      return '+1, funny';
      }else{
      return '-1, offtopic';
      }

    2. Re:Optimistic Crackpot Theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should uppercase your constants!

    3. Re:Optimistic Crackpot Theory by eatmywake · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dude, i think you might have a bug there. You should be more vigilent with your error checking - I would suggest adding the following to prevent injection of tainted variables;

      if ( in_array ( 'JarJar', $movie )) {
      if ( implode ( $movie ) ){
      unset ( $movie );
      return destroyed;
      }
      die();
      }

    4. Re:Optimistic Crackpot Theory by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Your code compiles perfectly in every language I tried it with!! ;)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    5. Re:Optimistic Crackpot Theory by Snap+E+Tom · · Score: 1

      You shouldn't be using PHP to write optimistic crackpot theories of this size. It doesn't scale and it's slow. Ruby or Python are much better for these kinds of theories because of blah blah blah blah blah.

    6. Re:Optimistic Crackpot Theory by lostchicken · · Score: 1

      Must not have tried very many...

      luna:~/Workspace twb$ javac vader.java
      vader.java:1: 'class' or 'interface' expected
      if( in_array( 'Darth Vader', $movie ) ){
      ^
      vader.java:1: unclosed character literal
      if( in_array( 'Darth Vader', $movie ) ){
      ^
      vader.java:1: unclosed character literal
      if( in_array( 'Darth Vader', $movie ) ){
      ^
      3 errors

      luna:~/Workspace twb$ cc vader.c
      vader.c:1: error: parse error before "if"
      vader.c:1:15: warning: character constant too long for its type

      luna:~/Workspace twb$ perl vader.pl
      Undefined subroutine &main::in_array called at vader.pl line 1.

      luna:~/Workspace twb$ ruby vader.ruby
      vader.ruby:1: syntax error
      vader.ruby:3: syntax error
      }else{
      ^

      --
      -twb
    7. Re:Optimistic Crackpot Theory by cstacy · · Score: 1

      (defmethod good-movie-p ((movie star-wars))
      (member 'vader (characters movie)))

    8. Re:Optimistic Crackpot Theory by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Hmmph. You must need to update your compilers. ;)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    9. Re:Optimistic Crackpot Theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate lisp's usage of '

      throws me off every time..

  58. Again?!! by pbaumgar · · Score: 1

    It's only been 4 days since this topic was posted last.. C'mon Slashdot....

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/05/06/144321 7&tid=101&tid=97&tid=1

  59. What we know by notany · · Score: 1
    What we know from other sources:
    1. Mace Windu goes down with style (like black dudes usually do).
    2. Lucas fears that SWII flops (fear of losing money can make you more conservative)
    3. This is not for kids.
    4. Episode II was better than episode I.
    5. Plot: One of the coolest evil overlords is born. How can it be better.
    Add to that some quotes from the article:

    "Entertaining from start to finish and even enthralling at times."

    "The technical achievement here is on such a high level that one is lulled into taking it for granted,"

    "the robot R2-D2 (Kenny Baker) delivers brilliant comic action. This holds true throughout the new film as writer-director Lucas does a much better job of interweaving comedy with the dramatic and even tragic."

    What can we see deduce from all above? It seems that Lucas is back in the basics again. Better effects, our hero R2-D2 does funny parts, Darth Vader, Yoda, awesome space battles. No new major characters. That means storyline can be more dense. You can fit all the fight scenes plus drama into the movie without destroying it.

    --
    Dyslexics have more fnu.
    1. Re:What we know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Mace Windu goes down with style (like black dudes usually do).

      I heard that Jar Jar accidentally blows Windu's head off in the openning scene with a blaster. "Meesa didn't know it were loaded!"

      Yoda, Obi Wan, and Anakin then slice and dice Jar Jar like a trio of chefs from a Japanese Steakhouse.

    2. Re:What we know by Rallion · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When one considers that the inside of R2 had porn plastered all over the inside to ease Baker's discomfort (I'm not making this up) one wonders what kind of comedy is involved.

  60. Not surprising by aussie_a · · Score: 1
  61. For those not so good in English. by hthb · · Score: 1, Informative

    Definition of "effusive":

    3. overly demonstrative; expressing emotion in an
    unrestrained manner; exhibiting unrestrained enthusiasm;
    -- of people and human actions; as, effusive thanks; an effusive letter of recommendation. Contrasted with reserved. [WordNet sense 1+2]

    --
    Visit www.doc2pdf.net for a free, no need to register, .doc to .pdf file conversion.
  62. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  63. Foregone conclusion by Durzel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    To be honest though Lucas didn't have an awful lot to do for this film - he already knew how it had to end. I'm no writer but I'd wager it is a lot easier to formulate a screenplay when you already know exactly what it has to achieve to be considered a success.

    Contrast that with Episodes I and II, where Lucas had very little in terms of pre-ordained plot development - the result was obvious, Jar Jar Binks et al.

    Not to mention of course that since Episodes I and II were poorly received (62% and 65% respectively), reviews of this film were (and are already) bound to draw comparisons and as such favour it accordingly anyway.

    For me one of the worst things about the previous two films in the franchise is that because they were continuations (albeit prequels) of what had already become legendary - no one had to try very hard. As a result the acting is wooden, the dialogue stunted and insincere, etc. Reminds me of the cringeworthy Matrix sequels.

    Anyway, I personally believe that if the film didn't happen to include the words "Star Wars" in the title, that we would be seeing completely different reviews. And I consider myself to be an avid Star Wars fan to boot.

    1. Re:Foregone conclusion by Evro · · Score: 1

      Everybody knew how Titanic ended and it made a boatload of money. Just because you know the "ending" doesn't mean there isn't a lot of work to do to get the story from point A to point B.

      And yes that pun made me cringe as I typed it.

      --
      rooooar
    2. Re:Foregone conclusion by angle_slam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The scale goes from 0 to 100. 62 and 65 aren't bad. In fact, rottentomatoes considers 60 and above to be "recommended".

    3. Re:Foregone conclusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For me one of the worst things about the previous two films in the franchise is that because they were continuations (albeit prequels) of what had already become legendary - no one had to try very hard.

      Well duh! There is no try.

      The thing I dislike most are the fanboys. Not the ultra-geeks who lap up everything to do with Star Wars, but the people on the rung below them. The ones that will buy the same films over and over, simply because it came in a boxed set, or had the words "super-duper edition" on the front. The ones that will go see a film, tell everyone it's crappy, go see the sequel(!), tell everyone it's crappy, and then go and see the third one as well!

      It's everything that's wrong with the film industry. Given any crappy film, there should be plenty of warning that it's crappy, but people get impressed by a thirty second trailer and pay to see it anyway.

      There's no feedback loop promoting quality. All the film companies have to do is get a popular lead, a snappy title, and make a flashy trailer. If you want extra money, tie it into a franchise or make a sequel to a popular film. Where is the "actually make a good film" in the requirement to make money? It's not there! People, being the mindless drones that they are, will go and see it anyway, so why go to the extra expense of making a quality film?

    4. Re:Foregone conclusion by Durzel · · Score: 1

      Granted, but you have to wonder how impartial Rotten Tomatoes (or rather the reviewers upon which it bases its overall rating) are. My guess is that ~60% when taken in the context of being a Star Wars movie (which to many can do no wrong) is not that great a review.

      As far as Star Wars movies go, the scale probably starts at around 50% :)

    5. Re:Foregone conclusion by sl70 · · Score: 1

      Rottentomatoes has an ``Episode III Tomatometer Watch'' going on on its home page http://www.rottentomatoes.com/. It's at 92% now, with 24 reviews in. Not too shabby.

      --
      Thank God I'm an atheist!
    6. Re:Foregone conclusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could he have possibly made the first two episodes of less quality to make the third seem that much better?

    7. Re:Foregone conclusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd argue the Matrix Reloaded wasn't so bad - it had ups (Neo vs. Merovingian minions fight, freeway, Architect) as well as downs (Zion dance scene that lasted forever, trainman nonsense). Revolutions was what really totaled it for me. Auuuuuugh.

    8. Re:Foregone conclusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...I'd wager it is a lot easier to formulate a screenplay when you already know exactly what it has to achieve to be considered a success."

      Not at all, quite the opposite. The writer would be swinging from boredom, which becomes a sloppy film, to abject fear of predictability, which can crush the love of the creative process and make characters and dialogue wooden.

      IMHO, as a professional Screenwriter, I think the path to an excellent trilogy would be completion of all three scripts prior to seeking greenlight on any of them. This way, all three are a labor of love and free of the media/fan expectation trap. Sadly, time is money and one can never be certain of a greenlight. Financing therefore requires a first completion with mere outlines for the potential trilogy screenplays.

      This is why so many writers and directors avoid sequels like the plague. "It's a trap!"

  64. You just have to realize... by paranode · · Score: 5, Funny
    The naysayers are always the most vocal. The Lucas-haters never really understand the sad irony of their situation, because while they thrash the new movies as a betrayal of their lovely childhood memories they forget themselves in an inconspicuous and pitiful devotion to concerning themselves with every move Lucas makes.

    Their sad devotion to that ancient trilogy has not helped them conjure up DVDs of the original films, or given them clairvoyance enough to find something better to do with their time.

    1. Re:You just have to realize... by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1

      I find your lack of faith disturbing...

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
    2. Re:You just have to realize... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Don't try to frighten us with your producer's ways, George Lucas. Your sad devotion to that ancient trilogy has not helped you conjure
      up our stolen childhood memories, or given you clairvoyance enough to find the hidden originals...

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    3. Re:You just have to realize... by wmelnick · · Score: 1

      Their sad devotion to that ancient trilogy has not helped them conjure up DVDs of the original films

      You obviously have not visited the torrent sites lately...

    4. Re:You just have to realize... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Downloading compressed versions of VHS or laserdisc rips and burning them to a DVD is hardly the same thing, buddy.

  65. "George got it right finally" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think he deliberately made the first 2 films suck, so that we will get blown away totally by the third one.

    And all the critics burrow back into their caves, like Obiwan in the desert.

  66. is a review going to stop anyone here from movie? by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Talking about reviews are pretty silly. I doubt even a bad review would stop any slashdotter from seeing this Star Wars finalee.

  67. Re:It's all about the Vader (SPOILER ALERT!) by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

    Except, Vader isnt supposed to appear until the last 5 minutes of the movie or so, so you will still need to sit through 2 and a half hours of a Vaderless Star Wars. That said, after reading some early reviews I'm looking forward to seeing this movie - especially to see how they "dovetail" it to Ep. 4. I'm sure we will all be reading about the inconsistencies, etc. on slashdot in the weeks and months to come!

  68. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  69. No matter what ... by houghi · · Score: 1

    I am not going to see it. I saw 4, 5 and 6 about half a year before 1 came out and really liked them. I then went on to see 1 and was disgusted. I had not seen the others in my youth, so I was not influenced and had not waited anxiously for so many years.

    It just sucked. 4, 5 and 6 were a bit dated, but good. 1 was bad. Therefore I had NO interest in seeing 2 and have no interest in seeing 3. That would be as you would watch only RotK and not the other two.

    4, 5 and 6 can stand on their own without the help of a shitty 1 and 2 and perhaps good 3.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  70. Just seen a preview by Bazzargh · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... and boy was that intriguing! can't wait to see whats coming in Episode 4!

  71. The problem with #1 was by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    there was no character conflict.

    if you look at the movie, the high point of character conflict was gui-qon getting annoyed at jar-jar at dinner.

    Darth fought them and didn't say -anything- for like 15 minutes. He didn't say how strong the dark side was or how pathetic they were or diddly.

    Unlike star wars: new hope, where just about everyone was arguing and disagreeing about something, everyone in the first movie just kinda agreed with each other and went through the motions.

    Star wars 2 improved on it a little but was weak on the acting and instead of seeming conflicted, anakin just seemed whiny.

    I hope this new movie is decent, that will make 3& 1/2 good star wars films.

    Star Wars 3, 4, 5, and the first half of 6.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    1. Re:The problem with #1 was by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      anakin just seemed whiny.

      Agreed, but maybe Lucas was just trying establish Anakin was Luke's father. I mean, by now we know we can't take anything Obi-wan says at face value.

  72. I'll make them instead, bitches by geekpuppySEA · · Score: 1

    Well, he may not ALLOW them to be made - but I'm going to continue with the tradition of suck-ass filmmaking, and with my handheld camera, abandoned child's doll and scummy toilet tank, I'll film the first three and affectionately re-title them "FATHER, MIRROR, FATHER, MIRROR."

    --
    Intelligent Design: because MATH is HARD.
  73. Nothing would be good enough by davidmcw · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Lets be frank here and I'm not trolling.

    Nothing will be good enough for the Slashdot crowd. He could film it in super douper total emersion 3D-o-vision with the best script & acting on the planet and there will still be compaints from many of the Slashdot crowd. He could choose to be totally divorced from the bloody thing and people will still hark back to how it isn't quite as good as the one they saw while in their nappy 25 years ago, and George has spoiled.

    Hindsight is invariably 20-20 and rose tinted. People seem to forget that the originals had their very dodgy moments too. What people remember is not just the movie, it is the whole experience that they had when sitting there many moons ago, before the got old and embittered by age and by supporting Windows boxes (coz supporting Unix doesn't embitter one as much does it). It was going with their parents, getting popcorn, sitting surrounded in awe by peers, with their parents or older siblings. Playing with X Wing fighters for weeks afterward. It was getting all the mags & figures & watching the cheesy kids shows jump on the bandwagon. It was the fact that this was totally new, nothing else came close.

    I watched the rest, I await the next as does everyone else here, even those that refuse to admit it.

    Oh and just to piss off the remaining readers I haven't offended yet, I love my TiVo.

    --
    Just because your paranoid doesn't really mean they aren't out to get you
    1. Re:Nothing would be good enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. You obviously haven't seen Episodes 1 and 2. I could go to the Matrix sequels and enjoy them. I could even go to Aliens 4 and enjoy it. Episodes 1 and 2, however, is pure crap.

    2. Re:Nothing would be good enough by kindbud · · Score: 0

      Why have you invested so much emotional energy into wanting everyone to love Star Wars? The fact of the matter is that the last two movies hurled green snot globules, and I ain't paying to see the third. Everyone raved about how much better the 2nd one was than the 1st, but I waited until it came out on cable TV and wasn't disappointed that I had waited. What a steaming pile of bird turds. The Yoda/Doodoo fight was ridiculous, yet this is what all the fanboys raved about.

      I saw Star Wars the original when I was 14. My parents didn't take me to see it, I rode my bike down to the movies and saw it with my friends. It was $1 matinee. We didn't play with X-Wing fighter toys, that was for 3rd graders.

      I await the next as does everyone else here, even those that refuse to admit it.

      Ah, blow me.

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
    3. Re:Nothing would be good enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well you're pretty much wrong at least as to how I relate to the star wars films, I saw the first film when it first came out and didn't much care for it, I watched it again nearly a decade later in conjunction with my first exposure to Empire Strikes Back and liked it. My liking for the original three has nothing to do with some sort of nostalgia for the way they made me feel, I liked them, but not so much that I would stand in line or collect toys or do anything other than have them to play when I feel like it which is maybe once every few years.

    4. Re:Nothing would be good enough by davidmcw · · Score: 1

      I saw 1 & 2 and thought that they were acceptable movies, sure they had their crap bits and just pure excuses for CGI, but they also had a lot going for them.

      Now the Matrix, one was stunning. Two was pointless, bought it one DVD, watched about 70% of it once, I guess the disk will never see the light of day again, I guess. Never saw three, not even remotely interested, heard a bit, nothing that would encourage me to go.

      I saw Star Wars when I was about 12, I think. I now see the new ones with my kids, they like 'em, they like the old ones too, I like that they like them all. I don't get too high & mighty about it, coz' they're only movies.

      --
      Just because your paranoid doesn't really mean they aren't out to get you
    5. Re:Nothing would be good enough by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      The originals had character conflict and personality.

      Since they had a personality, you could care about them.

      The two newer movies were devoid of these- the character with the most personality was computer generated.

      If you don't care about the characters, all the special effects in the world are not going to save the film.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    6. Re:Nothing would be good enough by davidmcw · · Score: 1

      I don't think I've really invested any emotional energy into it, I'm being a realist, it's a bloody movie. In a world of motgages, deadlines, bosses and families, it comes kinda far down my list of must-do's. I'm stating that the feelings that people have for the movies are more than just colours on celluloid, it is the whole package, everyelse that was going on in their lives at the time.

      You know what, I don't really care who goes and sees it, I don't care who likes, I know many will and the day it is released Slashdot will be a bitch-fest, even if critics the world over praise it. There is nothing George Lucas could do that will get him praise on that first day.

      So you were using the 'stick-that-is-my-light-sabre' toy then.

      No thanks, busy and not really motivated to.

      --
      Just because your paranoid doesn't really mean they aren't out to get you
    7. Re:Nothing would be good enough by frenchgates · · Score: 1

      There's an extremely high correlation between old school Star Wars fans who now have kids and those who actually like the new episodes. Generally those without kids don't have those little undiscriminating eyes to see it through and so aren't blind to the stupidity. Jar Jar Binks isn't some "crap bit", he's a huge and epochally terrible ruinous part of Episode I and nothing can change that.

      The problem with the "you just aren't twelve anymore or you'd see the new ones the same way you saw the old ones" is twofold:

      1. I was still a kid when I saw RotJ and could sense it was largely crap.

      2. You can't rate a movie highly becuause kids like it. They are known for their terrible taste. Enduring appeal rather then "that was cool!" as they leave the theater is a better measure.

      --
      Syntax error: loose != lose, affect != effect, then!=than
    8. Re:Nothing would be good enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you're saying is ... when he re-releases Episode III on DVD in 20 years, it'll be even worse?

      ("Anakin shoots first!")

    9. Re:Nothing would be good enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mythtv 4evar!!!!!!111oneone

    10. Re:Nothing would be good enough by ameline · · Score: 1

      I know what would be good enough for the Slashdot crowd -- it's simple if you think for even a moment;

      Full (and extended) frontal nudity for Natalie Portman.

      That's all it would take.

      (Ducking quickly :-)

      --
      Ian Ameline
    11. Re:Nothing would be good enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hindsight is invariably 20-20 and rose tinted.

      By which you mean what? That it's simultaneously very accurate (which is what 20-20 would imply) but very distorted (which is what rose-tinted would imply)?

    12. Re:Nothing would be good enough by Trogre · · Score: 1

      I think the GP meant 50/50, commonly used to refer to dodgy vision.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    13. Re:Nothing would be good enough by Pinback · · Score: 1

      Star Wars was a bad movie. But it was a very good bad movie.

      Doesn't mean that people don't have strong feelings for it anyway.

    14. Re:Nothing would be good enough by evilviper · · Score: 1
      People seem to forget that the originals had their very dodgy moments too.

      A few "dodgy moments" perhaps, but each of the movies was still very good, by any standard.

      It was the fact that this was totally new, nothing else came close.

      Your whole arguement is that people where young when they saw the originals, and are now old seeing the prequals. This doesn't hold up for perhaps the majority of /.ers (including myself) who didn't even see them in the theatre, and may have only seen them a few years ago for the first time. I know a few adults who have never seen the originals (scary, I know), but when to see EP1 and said how incredibly crappy it was...

      I watched the rest, I await the next as does everyone else here, even those that refuse to admit it.

      No, I honestly don't await the next one. I saw the first two (and the second only in fast-forward), and that was far too many. I can't imagine anyone possibly making the first two, making anything decent at all, ever. It's not worth the risk, IMHO, that it will be horrendous, and just make things much worse.

      A good example would be Terminator 3. Not only was it an incredibly horrible movie, but it was the follow-up to two very good movies. T3 was so bad that I really can't enjoy the first two, like I used-to. It's like any movie that seems pretty good throughout, yet ending weak, and taking the entire film down with it... T3 took the Terminator story down several notches, as did the Star Wars prequals. The final prequal is very likely to make things worse, not better, and the last thing I want is to hate Star Wars more, and be unable to get the prequals out of my head when watching the originals.

      To George Lucas: Fool me once, shame on you, fool me 3 times for no good reason... you deserve to be shot.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  74. Dude, You Change Your Underwear? by jac1962 · · Score: 1

    What for?

    --
    "I worked hard for it. I deserve it. And I have it," Campbell said. "It's all mine."
  75. Re:and... that makes no sense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Maybe he just learned his lesson this time...

    GL: Damn, I suck as a director/screenwriter... shit people are not going to fall for this for the third time -- I better do something!

  76. Bless The Enthusiasm! by CheeseburgerBlue · · Score: 1

    This is the *last* time we ever get to be this excited about Star Wars again -- amazingly -- we may not feel SICK about it the next day!

    Imagine that!

    It's like I'm back in May of 1999 again -- innocent and as yet untainted by Jar Jar.

    Also, the swell of enthusiasm has meant great things for those of us who happen to journal the daily life of certain dark lords of the Sith.

  77. Please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    turn in your Slashdot ID and your geek badge. You are no longer welcome around here.

  78. "Spielberg weeps at Star Wars screening" by peter303 · · Score: 2, Funny

    At first when I saw this headline on Matt Drudge, perhaps Speilberg was sad because the yet this was yet another cheesey episode in a long melodramatic series. However, the article says Steve was genuinely moved by the film.

    1. Re:"Spielberg weeps at Star Wars screening" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spielberg gave rave reviews about episode 1 too. I can't quite believe everything he says about Star Wars movies.

  79. been there, seen that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    By amazing luck I've seen it at a preview :-)

    No spoilers, but it has much the same feel as Attack Of the Clones. As someone else mentioned, it does have a Gone With The Wind feel, especially as Padme looks out across a burning cityscape - she could be seeing Atlanta burn.

    Amazing CGI battles/action in the first half, but more characters riding CGI animals, which *never* works (Anakin in AOTC for instance). And in the end too many light sabre duels, a bit too much tying up loose ends (even explaining how Obi turns up as a ghost in the next/first three!).

    The 'creation' of Darth is very gruesome, this plus a bit of infanticide makes it surprisingly dark in places.

    Well worth the multiplex fare, though I think as with the first/next three, the middle film will prove to be the best.

  80. We shall overcome by jfengel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm a member of an oppressed minority group who believes that New Hope was better than Empire.

    I dunno why that is. Maybe we didn't care for some of the darkness in ESB, and New Hope was more fun. Maybe the open-ended conclusion was less thrilling than the destruction of the Death Star. Maybe it's the "freshman effect" that made Clerks better than Mallrats. (Not that ESB is anything like Mallrats. ESB is a great movie. Just less fun than New Hope.)

    It's not important why. I just wanted to state out loud that although it's accepted wisdom that Empire was better than New Hope, it's not entirely universal.

    But that's why I've said before on Slashdot that I thought that Sith had a good chance to be the best of the prequels: it ties in to what I feel is the best of the originals.

    1. Re:We shall overcome by Brown+Eggs · · Score: 2

      I think what you are feeling towards New Hope is similar to what is often felt about the matrix series. The first movie left you with a very open ended conclusion, and a lot of unexplained things. And that is probably why so many people liked it, and really didn't get that crazy about the rest. In some ways, that open ending is better - it leaves the rest of the universe up to your imagination. Somehow, when someone tries to go and explain it all via more movies, it just seems wrong :) That being said, I think purely from an artistic angle, Empire edges out a New Hope .

    2. Re:We shall overcome by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      Uh, Empire has a more open ended conclusion than New Hope. New Hope could have stood alone as a single movie. Whee, the death star blowed up real good and the heroes save the day and get medals.
      Parent poster stated:

      "Maybe the open-ended conclusion was less thrilling than the destruction of the Death Star."

      Implying that he didn't care for the open ending of Empire. By your logic he would prefer Matrix Revolutions to the original.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    3. Re:We shall overcome by Teddy+Beartuzzi · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Preach on, brotha.

      The "Empire is the best of the three" is a relatively recent phenomena. In 1980, almost no one felt this way. All my friends and I came out of the theatre saying "Geezus, what a downer. No where near as good as the first one!" It was hard to find anyone who felt the opposite. And the box office totals showed that most of the general public felt the same, the magic wasn't as strong, fewer people were doing the "I've got to see this 12 times" thing, etc.

      In 1983, much of the opinion going into Jedi was "I hope it's better than Empire!" Turns out it wasn't, of course.

      Once the trilogy was complete, and on video etc, that's when the tide started to turn towards Empire. As a part of the whole, fans grew to appreciate it more. But as a standalone film? Can't touch Star Wars.

  81. Re:and... that makes no sense. by chromium · · Score: 0

    Sadly, I don't think even he had enough money for that.

  82. You'll enjoy this then.. by musakko · · Score: 1
  83. MODERATORS by CoffeeJedi · · Score: 1

    mod parent up
    mod grandparent down

    grandparent confused dialouge with plot and is somehow mod'd insightful, parent straightened it out

    --
    May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage. RAmen.
  84. Then.. by paranode · · Score: 2, Funny
    Palpatine goes back in time and uses the numbers for himself and becomes the rich emperor of an evil empire. Lest you think he got away with it, Palpatine broke off a part of his cane while he was in the force chamber so Obi-Wan knew that he had to go back in time to prevent Palpatine from controlling Anakin and using the money to take over the galaxy. So while Obi-Wan is driving the DeLorean and...

    Wait I'm confused.

    1. Re:Then.. by slapout · · Score: 1

      Obi-Wan is driving the DeLorean and...

      ...a stray blaster shot damages the flux capacitor and he ends up going back too far in time. He uses parts from his light saber to fix the capacitor, but the DeLorean's Mr. Fusion is broken and he needs a way to power the car. Unfortunately he is stuck in a primitive time. Then he hears about a powerful force and sets out on a long, perilous journey to find the "one ring to rule them all"....

      --
      Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  85. I have a bad feeling about this.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    But who knows....

  86. How much is due to relief that its finally over? by crovira · · Score: 1

    No more possibilities of sequels or prequels or what ever you call the discontinuous style of blathering on.

    AND NO MORE CHARACTERS AND PROPS FROM KIDDIE'S IMAGINATIONS!!!

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  87. The final episode? by fmayhar · · Score: 2, Funny

    So whatever happened to episodes 7, 8 and 9? (If anyone else can remember that far back, when Lucas was talking about his nine-episode epic.)

  88. Isn't that how you do character development? by khasim · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I mean, other than having a movie about a guy talking about himself ...

    The characters are dropped into situations and they react. Like when Han shot a bounty hunter sitting across from him.

    Lucas' problem isn't character development. His problem is back-story. Vader had more character development in ep 4 & 5 than any other bad guy has had in ep 1-3.

    Lucas just doesn't know how to write a story that will result in the character he has already developed. Which is why he falls back on fan-boy tricks of re-introducing the previously created characters and such (the droids, Boba's daddy, Tatoonie, etc).

    Vader has character.

    Annie is just put through some badly written situations and dialog so we can get to the Vader suit.

    1. Re:Isn't that how you do character development? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod up!

      This can be summed up by saying: Lucas made three prequels when he only should have made one.

      Bottom line is that Ep 3 wiil be considered "good" because it's based entirely on the backstory introduced in the original Star Wars (4), and despite it's pointless predecessors.

    2. Re:Isn't that how you do character development? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      sorry s/development/introduction/g of my original post.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    3. Re:Isn't that how you do character development? by th3space · · Score: 1

      Annie is just put through some badly written situations and dialog so we can get to the Vader suit.

      For a second there, I was desperately afraid you were going to bring up the Annie Hall debacle...

      --
      "How like you to drag your keyboard to a gun fight." - Aaron Bedard (BANE)
    4. Re:Isn't that how you do character development? by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1
      Lucas just doesn't know how to write a story that will result in the character he has already developed. Which is why he falls back on fan-boy tricks of re-introducing the previously created characters and such (the droids, Boba's daddy, Tatoonie, etc).

      AFAIK, Lucas said that the droids would be the only characters which would appear through all 9 movies (which was before he decided to make only 6 movies).

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    5. Re:Isn't that how you do character development? by angle_slam · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Vader had more character development in ep 4 & 5 than any other bad guy has had in ep 1-3.

      Vader grew between 4 & 5. But it seemed that it was because Lucas decided to change the course of the picture. I think some say that Lucas had the entire 9 movie series planned out before starting ep. 4. I don't believe it. Vader was the leader in ep. 5, second only to the Emperor. That's not true in ep. 4, where Tarkin seemed to be the leader.

      That is why there seems to be growth in Vader between 4 & 5--the whole Vader is Luke's father, turned by the Emperor storyline wasn't in existence at the time.

    6. Re:Isn't that how you do character development? by bnitsua · · Score: 1

      part of what made the originals great was Lucas' admiration/consulting with Joseph Campbell. after reading Joseph Campbell's work, he made a reedit of the scripts and applied Campbell's theory to them. and that's what made the difference.

    7. Re:Isn't that how you do character development? by Bamafan77 · · Score: 1
      I agree with this assessment and I've always wondered about this. If you watch Episodes 5 and 6 before Episode 4, there's no way you'd think the Vader would ever take of orders from anyone except for the Emporer. There's lots of other stuff in Star Wars that are inconsistent with the "Grand Vision" Lucas supposedly had years ago. After reading some of his interviews (don't get me started on the Joseph Campbell "myth" arc tripe), I've come to the conclusion that if enough people call someone a genius enough time at an early age, they start to believe it...even if it's not really true.

      That said, I love these movies to death anyway. All of this other stuff somewhat exists outside the scope of this great work.

    8. Re:Isn't that how you do character development? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just because Tarkin requested for Vader to release someone doesn't mean he was barking orders. Vader was still #2 in ANH. Tarkin was asking Vader to release him in a demanding manor. Sort of a you're being rediculous, release him. No diffrent than how you may tell your boss he is wrong when he is doing something stupid. Especially if he was doing it for personal enjoyment.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    9. Re:Isn't that how you do character development? by nbehary · · Score: 1

      Well, that is true, and I've always seen that scene that way, but..... There still is an impression throught ANH that Vader isn't quite what he is in ESB/ROTJ. It's hard for me to imagine AHN without the context the other 2 provide (I was 2 mo old in May 1977), but when I try I do see that disparity. I honestly don't think Lucas ever expected to get past 1 movie. I think realizing he could changed his vision. I'm not so sure he originally intended the Emporer to be Vader's "Master" at all. I think maybe he intended to seperate the Sith vs Jedi bits from the Alliance vs Empire parts a bit more.

      But that's just me.

    10. Re:Isn't that how you do character development? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      That could also be because ANH was still building the empire. The senate had just been disbanded. The Emporor was really only recently exersizing his supream power. etc...

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    11. Re:Isn't that how you do character development? by angle_slam · · Score: 1
      Just because Tarkin requested for Vader to release someone doesn't mean he was barking orders.

      Can you imagine one of the Generals in TESB "requesting" Vader to stop choking the other Admiral? Of course not, they were terrified of him. They weren't terrified of him in ANH (as seen by the guy (who Vader was choking) challenging Vader in the first place).

  89. From TFA? by cbreaker · · Score: 1

    Why did you use "From TFA, " instead of just "From the article" or "From TA" or something?

    You do know the F stands for Fuck?

    You started out okay, but then you said "From The Fucking Article, " is that really necessary?

    Ya'll should think about what your acronyms stand for before using them everywhere.

    --
    - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    1. Re:From TFA? by MrP-(at+work) · · Score: 1

      GF Yourself

      --
      [an error occurred while processing this directive]
    2. Re:From TFA? by grunherz · · Score: 1


      Pretty empty criticism coming from someone who mentions hating an entire demographic in his/her sig.

      --
      Four weeks, Twenty papers, that's two dollars ... plus tip.
    3. Re:From TFA? by smithmc · · Score: 1

      You started out okay, but then you said "From The Fucking Article, " is that really necessary?... Ya'll should think about what your acronyms stand for before using them everywhere.

      Y'all should become more familiar with /. mores before pontificating like this. It is virtually de rigeur on /. to write "TFA" when referring to an article in this fashion.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    4. Re:From TFA? by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      Sure, when you say "You moron, you didn't even read TFA!!"

      But I wouldn't say to my mom "ohh hey did you read the fucking article in the times today about that guy?"

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    5. Re:From TFA? by smithmc · · Score: 1

      But I wouldn't say to my mom "ohh hey did you read the fucking article in the times today about that guy?"

      Uh, huh - and does your mother post on /. much?

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  90. too late... Joss is my new master now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  91. why would they be jamming our transmission... ? by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

    it's a trap!

    e.

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  92. Re:Tell you what I'm doing -- Netflix by ianscot · · Score: 1
    By Episode II I'd decided these didn't rate paying for tickets any more. Mostly it was the reviews, even though they weren't that bad. They sounded a little like this set: "He's returning to the form of ESB," they say.

    I watched Episode II while ironing, at home on a Netflix rental. It was so, so bad. (Somebody please explain how the whole "Jedi rescue mission" capper to the movie wasn't utterly stupid and pointless. "We don't fight wars... let's go fight a whole army in a big pitched battle, though." Or please, describe how sneaky Obi Wan was to park his ship right outside the enemy hideout's entrance and then to stand outside it and send his spy message back to the council. Oh, the lameness!)

    I wouldn't pay for this unless my various friends came back with unbelievable word of mouth to go with these reviews. The hype machine is so polished right now that, as it comes up for release, any big summer film has this sort of "It's better than expectations" spin on it. I'll trust my friends more.

    So it'll go on my Netflix queue. Even then, it won't be that high on the list. Unless real people tell me it's really worth it.

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  93. Full Text (site slashdotted) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Error: 500
    Location:
    /story/cbc/arts.jsp
    Internal Servlet Error:

    javax.servlet.ServletException: Included servlet threw exception
    at org.apache.tomcat.facade.RequestDispatcherImpl.wra pException(RequestDispatcherImpl.java:552)
    at org.apache.tomcat.facade.RequestDispatcherImpl.doI nclude(RequestDispatcherImpl.java:437)
    at org.apache.tomcat.facade.RequestDispatcherImpl.inc lude(RequestDispatcherImpl.java:189)
    at org.apache.jasper.runtime.PageContextImpl.include( PageContextImpl.java:413)
    at cbc.arts_1._jspService(arts_1.java:71)
    at org.apache.jasper.runtime.HttpJspBase.service(Http JspBase.java:119)
    at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet .java)
    at org.apache.tomcat.facade.ServletHandler.doService( ServletHandler.java:574)
    at org.apache.tomcat.core.Handler.invoke(Handler.java :322)
    at org.apache.tomcat.core.Handler.service(Handler.jav a:235)
    at org.apache.tomcat.facade.ServletHandler.service(Se rvletHandler.java:485)
    at org.apache.tomcat.facade.RequestDispatcherImpl.doF orward(RequestDispatcherImpl.java:272)
    at org.apache.tomcat.facade.RequestDispatcherImpl.for ward(RequestDispatcherImpl.java:174)
    at ca.cbc.web.controller.ActionRouter.route(ActionRou ter.java:76)
    at ca.cbc.web.controller.Controller.service(Controlle r.java:173)
    at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet .java)
    at org.apache.tomcat.facade.ServletHandler.doService( ServletHandler.java:574)
    at org.apache.tomcat.core.Handler.invoke(Handler.java :322)
    at org.apache.tomcat.core.Handler.service(Handler.jav a:235)
    at org.apache.tomcat.facade.ServletHandler.service(Se rvletHandler.java:485)
    at org.apache.tomcat.core.ContextManager.internalServ ice(ContextManager.java:917)
    at org.apache.tomcat.core.ContextManager.service(Cont extManager.java:833)
    at org.apache.tomcat.modules.server.Ajp13Interceptor. processConnection(Ajp13Interceptor.java:341)
    at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.TcpWorkerThread.runIt(P oolTcpEndpoint.java:494)
    at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlR unnable.run(ThreadPool.java:516)
    at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:536)

    Root cause:

    java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: cbc.artsBegin_1
    at org.apache.tomcat.util.depend.DependClassLoader.lo adClassInternal1(DependClassLoader.java:186)
    at org.apache.tomcat.util.depend.DependClassLoader12$ 1.run(DependClassLoader12.java:92)
    at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
    at org.apache.tomcat.util.depend.DependClassLoader12. loadClass(DependClassLoader12.java:90)
    at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:2 55)
    at org.apache.tomcat.facade.ServletHandler.getServlet (ServletHandler.java:343)
    at org.apache.tomcat.facade.ServletHandler.preInit(Se rvletHandler.java:439)
    at org.apache.tomcat.facade.ServletHandler.init(Servl etHandler.java:228)
    at org.apache.tomcat.facade.ServletHandler.service(Se rvletHandler.java:472)
    at org.apache.tomcat.facade.RequestDispatcherImpl.doI nclude(RequestDispatcherImpl.java:402)
    at org.apache.tomcat.facade.RequestDispatcherImpl.inc lude(RequestDispatcherI

  94. Having seen the movie.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having seen the movie I can tell you that this is the best of the entire series. In fact you have to be the most anal star wars fan in the world to find fault in this movie. It is dark, violent, and ties the entire epic together. Want to know why some jedi disappear when they die and some don't? Want to know how luke gets Anakins light saber? Want to know why leia remembers her mother and luke doesn't? Want to know why obi wan can appear to luke? etc.. All the little things star wars fans have been bitching about for over 25 years will all come to light. It is a perfect ending. The only sad thing is when you come to realize that its over.

  95. Re:and... that makes no sense. by rpillala · · Score: 1
    --
    When the axe came to the forest, the trees said, "Look out - the handle was once one of us."
  96. Re:and... that makes no sense. by gambino21 · · Score: 1

    And he did.
    At least for Episode 2 I remember a lot of reviews that said the movie was great, and made up for everything from the first . Then the movie was actually released and you had some un-biased reviewers seeing the movie. That's when the bad reviews started to come out.
    Even here and here the reviews didn't look to bad.

  97. Tetrology? by BartulaPrime · · Score: 1

    Personally, I think if III is pretty good, I'll just consider I & II non-existant in my universe and start the story there. Seriously, what would you really miss from I & II other than Anakin and Amidala meeting and some political stuff with Palpatine, the Separatists, and the Clone Army? Goodbye Jedi blood condition, immaculate conception, and crappy romantic dialogue.

  98. My easy to digest review by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 4, Funny

    Acting by the guy (whose name I refuse to learn) who plays Annakin: 0/10
    Acting by by the grits woman: 1/10
    Acting by Ewan MacGregor: 2/10
    Overall story: 6/10
    Nostalgia value as we see the things we recognise from Episode IV: 8/10
    Effects: 8/10
    Pleasure from hearing Princess Leia's theme again: 8/10
    Enjoyment value for those with a fetish for hand amputation: 9/10
    Intelligence of characters who don't notice how Padme became pregnant: 0/10
    Entertainment value of Yoda's big fight: 6/10
    Entertainment value Yoda's big fight would have had if we hadn't seen it before: 10/10
    General Grievous's homage to Harryhausen's Kali: 9/10
    Amount of sense General Grievous subplot made after editors removed vital explanations from movie: 3/10
    Did I mention Annakin's acting?: 0/10
    Quality compared to Episodes I and II: 10/10
    Quality compared to Episodes IV and V: 5/10
    Overall: 7/10

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  99. Spolier!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I cannot believe they gave away that there was an internal servlet error at org.apache.tomcat.facade.ServletHandler.doService( ServletHandler.java:574)!!!

    That was SUPPOSED TO BE surprise ending.

  100. Already have my tickets for 12:01 a.m. Wednesday by dohduffbeer703 · · Score: 1

    A geek am I.

  101. Let's Please Be Honest by joebok · · Score: 1

    If what I hear is true, then I think Georgie finally got it right - again. I don't care for JarJar as much as the next guy, but we wouldn't care if he didn't do something right the first time. Or the IVth time - whatever. You know what I mean.

  102. Bribes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    If I was an aging, washed-up movie producer, I probably wouldn't be above bribing a few people to give my lame and tired movie series good reviews wither.

  103. It doesn't matter by Ranger · · Score: 1

    It doesn't matter how good or bad Episode III is going to be. Hardcore fans will see it anyway. Even if they didn't care for I or II.

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  104. Wow.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....thanks for runining my childhood D:(

  105. Acting, scene selection, etc.. by gosand · · Score: 1
    The reason is because, unlike the last two movies, this time Lucas hired a professional acting coach. When you really get down to it, the wooden acting is the worst part about these movies. The story and dialogue, while vapid, is of the same caliber of the originals, imo. The difference is that normally good actors (ever seen Portman in a non-SW movie?) come across as being terrible.

    The bad acting is one thing, but it wasn't just that. I can't think of much I liked about EPI and EPII. The story is already laid out, and they were just OK. What do I remember about those movies? The corny and excruciatingly long pod racer scene. The annoyingly cute "Ani". The unnecessarily animated junk dealer. Not only the abomination Jar Jar, but the entire race of underwater annoyances. A feeble attempt to make Yoda look cool via a light-saber battle. The annoyingly scowly older Anakin. The 5 minute long lovey dovey scene in EPII. It was only 5 minutes for me because I only saw it in FFWD mode.

    Lucas has created memories in these movies, most of them bad. And these are his grand vision? Even if this movie is great, he would only get 3 out of 6, which is a failing grade. (ROTJ barely passed, being pulled along by the first two movies)

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  106. Ex-Star Wars fans need to check this out by frenchgates · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you haven't seen this take on Return of the Jedi, you must. Not only is it hilarious and right on the money, it even predicts and explains the crapiness so prevalent in Eps 1 & 2.

    --
    Syntax error: loose != lose, affect != effect, then!=than
    1. Re:Ex-Star Wars fans need to check this out by bmantz65 · · Score: 1

      I hate that list. Most of it is just cranky nitpicking.

    2. Re:Ex-Star Wars fans need to check this out by frenchgates · · Score: 1

      One man's cranky nitpicking is another man's on-the-nose relentlessly true slam. Come on, the Ewok song?!? Ewoks in general?!? Just like with Phantom Menace, a one-item list is enough.

      --
      Syntax error: loose != lose, affect != effect, then!=than
  107. Who Shot First? by shaved_weasel · · Score: 1

    HAN SHOT FIRST.

    Cute

  108. Re:Tell you what I'm doing -- Netflix by stanmann · · Score: 1

    The rescue mission was a diversion to give yoda time to assemble the army... Of course let's not go into the whole 15 minute diversion thing.. and suspension of disbelief.. etc.

    --
    Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
  109. Impartiality, or ignorance clothed in virtue? by johnjay · · Score: 1

    Noble impartiality is all well and good, but there's no point in forgetting history. If it was a director I trusted to make a good movie, I'd be tempted to give it the benefit of the doubt and go see it. Since it's Lucas, and I've already formed an opinion of his abilities based on his past work, the ONLY way I'll see it is if it gets good reviews.

    One of the reasons I'm intrigued by the review in Variety (here, but now needs registration) is that the reviewer had many of the same objections to the first movie that I did (I didn't bother with the second). Since he's not blind to Lucas's prior mistakes, he's piqued my interest.

    I'm not interested in shoving my opinion down anyone's throat. If you liked the earlier prequels, this sounds like it's going to be better then either of the first two.

    1. Re:Impartiality, or ignorance clothed in virtue? by s_wardman · · Score: 1

      Not noble impartiality. I take reviews into account, but I don't base my decision to watch solely on them. I wasn't wholly impressed by the first two episodes. I did enjoy them though. There are also previous works to base my opinions on. I rate "A New Hope" amd "The Empire Strikes Back" better than the first two "new" episodes.

      --
      A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that works.â"John Gaule
  110. Torrents to originals? by lupinstel · · Score: 0

    Can anybody provide torrents to the unmessed with laser disk versions of the first 3 movies?

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Cthulhu.
  111. The Force is not strong in this one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To quote many a Talkbacker at AICN. All I have to say about these reviews is...

    PLANT!

    Sorry (Formerly Known as) Uncle George, you screwed the pooch on TPM,CW, and the "reenvisioning" of the original trilogy when you put them on DVD. No way this movie can be any good.

  112. You have to look at it from his point of view. by khasim · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1. It was meant to remind people of the movies they liked. They remember Tatoonie from ep 4 and they liked ep 4. (and it saved Lucas from having to create another world and populate it).

    Besides, you left out the part about hoping that Vader would NEVER have any desire to visit family members. But that's probably okay because Annie didn't even bother to save his mom.

    2. It was meant to remind people of the movies they liked. They remember the droids from ep 4 and they liked ep 4. (and it saved Lucas from having to create another character to speak the lines).

    3. Lucas equates "skill" with "flash". A skilled Yoda would be more believable just standing there and blocking every attack (like the two Jedi did when faced with the attack droids in ep 1).

    4. That is "explained" by the "fact" that the Sith can "hide" themselves from the Jedi. That is their secret power. That and the ability to quickly find very powerful replacement apprentices who can train in secret to challenge the Jedi. The Jedi's secret power is the ability to blow up the Sith's Death Star in every movie.

    5. Jedi may be great individually. But they don't seem to spend any time learning group tactics. If it wasn't for their secret ability to blow up Death Stars, they probably would have been wiped out a long time ago. And that would have been a good plot. Big Jedi convention at Jedi Central and evil Emperor sends a nova torpedo into the sun. All Jedi dead expect for a couple who learned of the plan while travelling and tried to fight the control ship ... but failed.

    Ep 3 is a fan boy movie. You get to see the things you've already seen and you get flashy battles. People like flashy battles, right?

    1. Re:You have to look at it from his point of view. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Lucas said two decades ago was that the two droids would be the only characters who would be in all nine films. So he had to come up with SOME excuse for these very same droids being present from the start.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    2. Re:You have to look at it from his point of view. by rho · · Score: 1

      Also, remember that the Jedi were losing their ability to use the Force. It was explained in Ep. II that this was the case.

      Of course, in Ep. I, they explained that you got control over the Force through a damned virus, so what does that mean? The Jedi were being slipped penicillin in their coffee by the Sith? Who knows? It's not explained, it just is.

      Re: the Yoda battle--it looked like Yoda was doing pretty good, but Dooku (Stupid Name Alert! Stupid Name Alert! Seriously, what was going through Lucus' mind when he said, "You know what's an evil-sounding name? Better than Darth Sidious, Darth Maul, Darth Vader? Count Dooku.") forced Yoda to also contend with saving the lives of the other two Jedi. Of course, the question must be asked: while Dooku (gods!) was bringing the pillar down, why didn't Yoda--the incredible flying monkey-toad--dash over and slice him in half? Come on!

      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
    3. Re:You have to look at it from his point of view. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Technically Count Dooku's evil name is Darth Tyrannus.

    4. Re:You have to look at it from his point of view. by gentlemen_loser · · Score: 1

      Overall, you make some interesting points. Namely, points 1, 2, and 4. However, I take issue with the following:

      3. Lucas equates "skill" with "flash". A skilled Yoda would be more believable just standing there and blocking every attack (like the two Jedi did when faced with the attack droids in ep 1).

      Think this through. In melee combat, proximity negates skill. At some point, Yoda would have been cut down if "he just stood there". Yoda HAD to move.

      Finally, your closing comment:

      Ep 3 is a fan boy movie. You get to see the things you've already seen and you get flashy battles. People like flashy battles, right?

      Did you even READ the parent/originating review? While I agree with how you feel about the first two, the whole point about why this particular reviewer thought that EP3 was a good movie was that the best scenes were NOT the combat/fX scenes.

      I will go see this movie and withhold judgement until then.

    5. Re:You have to look at it from his point of view. by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 1

      I will not address each of those issues, but I also have wondered about how weak and helpless the Jedi are portrayed. I think our expectations of the power of the Jedi were setup by the "Superman" like portrayal of Vader in the original trilogy. With the onset of the prequels, we imagined a whole bunch of Jedi "Supermen" that were impervious to destruction.

      However, faced with the fact that he would have to wipeout thousands of these "good" supermen with only a hadful of "bad" supermen in the original trilogy in order to explain the lack of jedi in parts 4-6....I think Lucas painted himself in a corner that has proven hard to paint himself out of.

      Most people complain about Jar-Jar, Flying Toad Yoda, Pod Races, etc....My biggest hangup with the prequels is the weakness and retardation of the jedi.

      And again if Lucas had not made Vadar so superhuman in the original trilogy, then mnaybe our expectations of Jedi really being only akin to "mortal man" would have been easier to swallow.

      --
      (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
    6. Re:You have to look at it from his point of view. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's all about confidence, Darth Vader is a hotty and he knows it, Ewan Macgreggor looks like he's 60 or something, so he always thinks he's gonna die when he goes into combat, that and the "reputation" factor Darth Vader has. He could never fight a battle in his life, so long as he marches around with that shiny black costume on and people hail him everywhere he goes and stuff. Would you have gone hand to hand with Hitler?

  113. Well, duh. by sammy+baby · · Score: 1

    Well, duh. Everyone knows that petrification and gritification were side effects of pregnancy.

  114. define:confector by colonic · · Score: 1
    From TFA,
    Time magazine's Richard Corliss says that [...] Revenge of the Sith "shows Lucas storming back as a prime confector of popular art."

    If Google's "define:confector" results are accurate, I hope this refers to Jar Jar...

  115. She isn't good at math by aepervius · · Score: 1

    That is a five word review :)

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  116. Quintrilogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard it was a quintrilogy. Isn't there a possibility for two more trilogies?

  117. A few minor inconsistencies... by limabone · · Score: 1

    RotJ was on TV the other day, and having seen Return of the Sith, I can say that there are several inconsistencies. I don't want to spoil things too much...but here is an example:
    Anakin skywalker has a vertical scar crossing over his right eye. When Luke takes Vaders mask off at the end of Jedi, no scar. This can sort of be explained but it still kind of sucks.

    Luke and Leia also discuss their mother in Jedi and that conversation doesn't make much sense after watching Sith.

    This is nitpicking to be sure and not glaring plot holes (I can't think of any serious inconsistencies), but Lucas has complete creative control over all 6 movies so it's not like he can blame anyone else.

    I will say this though...I can pretty much guess t hat alot of these inconsistencies will be fixed up with YET ANOTHER EDITION OF THE ORIGINAL TRILOGY. You can bet dollars to doughnuts that Lucas will be adding that scar in, etc. The Lucas money machine will be on full steam after this.

    Vader is hardly in Sith but you really get a feel for how powerful he was (you will know what scene I am talking about when you watch it).

    But yeah, I would have to agree with the positive reviews...I was ragging on Lucas' writing in a previous comment, but his writing was never very good so if we leave that out of the equation the movie kicks a fair amount of ass.

    1. Re:A few minor inconsistencies... by eutychus_awakes · · Score: 4, Funny

      Q: . . .when Luke takes Vaders mask off at the end of Jedi, no scar.

      A: Bacta. Lots of Bacta.

      Q: . . .Luke and Leia also discuss their mother in Jedi

      A: More Bacta.

      --
      This sig is a test. If this had been an actual sig, you would be reading something quite a bit wittier than this now.
    2. Re:A few minor inconsistencies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When Luke takes Vaders mask off at the end of Jedi, no scar. This can sort of be explained but it still kind of sucks.

      There's a very good explanation for this: The movies were made twenty years apart. Grow up.

      Luke and Leia also discuss their mother in Jedi and that conversation doesn't make much sense after watching Sith.

      No, they discuss Leia's mother, whom you see Sen. Organa hand her to at the end of the movie.

      I can pretty much guess t hat alot of these inconsistencies will be fixed up with YET ANOTHER EDITION OF THE ORIGINAL TRILOGY.

      God, I hope so. I really like the first three movies, but so much of them is all but unwatchable now. The fight between Vader and Obi Wan in Star Wars? Oh so lame. Yes, I know these guys are both really old, but they're also supposed to be the last two badasses in the galaxy. Give them some dignity. And don't even get me started about the model shots. They're just terrible compared to modern CG. (They're still figuring how how to do CG right, obviously, but it's already a big improvement.)

      Hell, all six movies could stand a serious re-making.

      Vader is hardly in Sith

      WTF are you talking about? He's in nearly every shot in the movie.

  118. The Clone Wars animated DVD is better by chud67 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I recently bought the animated Star Wars Clone Wars DVD, thinking even if I didn't like it, it might be a good buy for my young son. To my surprise, it is actually better than any of the recent movies: it has non-stop action and holds up to repeat viewing quite well.

    1. Re:The Clone Wars animated DVD is better by dalmiroy2k · · Score: 1

      I feel the same way.
      And for some reason I found the same for Animatrix and matrix sequels

  119. Correction by dejavudeux · · Score: 0

    After looking at this more closely, it seems that you did in fact post first. Why don't people like you? Is it a high slashdot UID bias?

    1. Re:Correction by Metatron · · Score: 1

      I don't know ... part of the rich tapestry that is /. and its moderation system I guess :) and yes, I did indeed post first.

    2. Re:Correction by dejavudeux · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hmmm...maybe other slashdot users were watching the recut DVD in which Pertinax18 posted first. (There must be a +5 funny lurking somewhere in this thread... :))

    3. Re:Correction by dejavudeux · · Score: 0

      Hmmm...maybe other slashdot users were reading the recut slashdot in which Pertinax18 posted first.

    4. Re:Correction by dejavudeux · · Score: 0

      Please see my other reply, it makes more sense.

      Thanks.

    5. Re:Correction by dejavudeux · · Score: 0

      Interestingly somebody gave you a +1 Funny and the other guy is down to a +3 now. So now it is a little more fair (albeit with more redundancy.) I've posted enough about this thing now...(if people look at my posting history they'll think that this kind of thing is all that I care about...)

  120. eat Sith by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The film got an awful review in a major Belgian newspaper. Reviewer called it dull and not any better than previous 2 eps. Reviewer wrote: "kept checking my watch throughout, i did". I believe him.

  121. It could be enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But asking George to direct is like asking Ginger Lynn to do another porno.

    She's not the same girl she used to be. She's different now. You might catch her on a good day, with a little marijuana in her system, and she might lapse back into a total slut. But other than that, she's washed up. Done.

    She's just not the hell raiser she used to be...

  122. This is good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    last post!

  123. Re:Quintrilogy (right word? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did I use the right word? Sorry, I think I confused myself. But I did hear there was a couple more or so trilogies in it.

  124. In the Grand Scheme of Things... by MufasaZX · · Score: 1

    Yes, everybody here hates episodes 1 and 2, personally I've only ever seen 1 and skipped 2 entirely though I've heard various first hand reviews of it. Seeing now the 3rd episode get a PG-13 rating, George's plan looks pretty obvious now:

    Phantom Menace, with Jar Jar and a boy hero, was not bad, it just wasn't targeted at us existing fans. First and foremost Phantom is kids movie, designed to hook another generation of fans. The second movie a few years later was aimed a few years higher on the target audience scale, and earned a wee bit more respect out of us. And now the 3rd movie has moved up the age scale even more as that new fan base grows up, who are luckily now old enough that the movie also looks good to us old farts.

    It's the exact same thing as all the Harry Potter books. Written every few years for a few year older target audience, focusing on hooking and keeping a generation as it matures. Not a bad plan at all...and I'm sure if the writer goes back and writes prequels to hook in a new generation there will be a huge cry of despair from the existing fans who are no longer the target audience.

  125. hapless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Good special effects but extremely dumb corny story with simplistic "view" of good and evil. I guess that is one thing that appeals to fans who really don't understand grey shades and multiple conflicting motivations of complex human behavior. The acting is cardboard cut out in the best parts. These are really movies made for small children.

    One thing that I always notice in these kinds of Cowboys and Indian movies is the dialogue. When the hapless "writers" want to evoke an accent or primitive or noble they delete all contractions from the dialogue. It's kind of humorous, in a crude stumbling way.

    Yeah, I know, the geeks will hate me for critiquing their love story.

    1. Re:hapless by Clock+Nova · · Score: 1

      Well, if that's the way you feel about RotS, then you likely didn't enjoy any of the Star Wars movies. These things are what melodrama is all about. I don't think any of us truly believes that good and evil are "simple." But they can be very entertaining when presented that way.

      Actually, I think the people who are going to dislike this movie the most are the ones who really do see the world in terms of black and white, good vs. evil. Draw your own conclusions on that one.

      --
      There they were, sitting in the van with all those dials, and the cat was dead. -V. Marchetti, CIA
    2. Re:hapless by kurokaze · · Score: 2, Insightful

      umm dude.. you don't go to star wars and look for the "grey shades and multiple conflicting motivations of complex human behavior".... watch Schindler's List or Requiem for a Dream of you want something that has depth.

      Watch Star Wars to see Natalie Portman in a nice skin tight outfit :) oh, and the special effects!

  126. Ah, the irony by Moraelin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "I know, what's even worse are those first few movies. Just a few spaceships, Luke discovers the force, shoots a bunch of stormtroopers and blows up a Death Star or two. And Darth's his father. I mean seriosuly, what do people see in these things?"

    You know, I must be one of the very few total nerds who nevertheless haven't even seen Episode 4 until a few months ago. You know what? I can't see what people saw in that either.

    The acting isn't really any good. The story really does justice to the "Episode 3" title, because it's like waking into the middle of a movie with not much clue as to what's happened, why are they really fighting, and wth that's really solved. And the one lightsaber fight is not like between the most powerful Jedi alive and his Master, but like between people who've never used one before. Obi Wan holds it like he'd hold his... ahem, let's just say now I see why the "I see your schwartz is as big as mine" scene was there in the Spaceballs parody.

    I guess the one that said it the best was one of Scott Kurtz's characters in his PvP Online comic: it's not Lucas that ruined your childhood memories, it's growing up that did it. The only way you could find the new episodes as entertaining as the old ones (or I'd add, the only way to find the old ones entertaining at all too) is if you could see them through the eyes of a 6 year old.

    So while you were probably going for sarcasm, I find what you wrote there actually true: the old movies really _are_ even worse.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Ah, the irony by TheBurrito · · Score: 1
      And the one lightsaber fight is not like between the most powerful Jedi alive and his Master, but like between people who've never used one before. Obi Wan holds it like he'd hold his... ahem, let's just say now I see why the "I see your schwartz is as big as mine" scene was there in the Spaceballs parody.
      I think the typical response to this is that you're seeing a fight between an aging Jedi/Sith that are no longer at the height of their powers. Episodes 1-3 are supposed to be our chance to see "real" Jedi fighting it out.

      Of course, it actually just had to do with the difficulties in painting in the lightsaber glow back then; slower swords = easier. But I do agree that most of us see the old movies through rose-tinted glasses. I never saw Indiana Jones as a kid, and to this day I just can't understand what people see in it. Same thing.

    2. Re:Ah, the irony by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1
      It's not the growing up that ruined it. You have to look back at what the current state of 'sci-fi' in film was at the time. At the the technical sophistication of special effects. Star Wars went way way beyond anything on film in either category. It took things to an entirely different level.

      If you've only seen it now, you've grown up with lots of equivalent sci-fi movies and effects. It's hard for you to imagine the impact that the original movie had. Groundbreaking doesn't do it justice.

      That being said, sure looking at it now with some perspective, yes, the acting and storytelling aren't that great, but those were entirely washed away at the time by it's leaps ahead in other areas.

      The closest reference you younger guys probably have is when the Matrix came out. That one was kinda/sorta groundbreaking in some areas, but it wasn't within an order or magnitude of the amount of impact Star Wars had. Luckily, the Wachowski brothers killed it's specialness right away with terrible sequels, so you won't be in for any trauma later in life ;).

    3. Re:Ah, the irony by Lovesquid · · Score: 1

      GP post: You know, I must be one of the very few total nerds who nevertheless haven't even seen Episode 4 until a few months ago. You know what? I can't see what people saw in that either

      Parent post: I never saw Indiana Jones as a kid, and to this day I just can't understand what people see in it

      The reason that you didn't "see" anything in these is precisely because you did not see them as a kid, grow up surrounded by their merchandising, play make-believe with their toys, and in general, worship these stories as a kid.

      The main reason that all of the now-grown-up Star Wars and Indy-raised kids are now so disappointed in the new films is only partly because of their quality or lack thereof, and more significantly because the freshness, awe, and overall magic of those films as a kid is missing. Newer and better fantasy epics (good and bad) have since come along , fantastic rubber creatures have been replaced by too-realistic looking CGI, and our collective sense of wonder is now more jaded and cynical with age.

      The same can be said not just of the sensibilities of lifelong Star Wars fans, but also of Lucas himself. I would not expect you to understand the appeal of the originals, having had no experience with growing up with them.

      Really, anything that attempts to recapture the nostalgic, rose-colored exuberance of youth often comes off as disappointing. Nothing ever measures up to the way things used to be, for some of us. Try going back and playing those old "classic" computer games from your youth and see how much they measure up now, after comparing them to things 20+ years later.

      We can't go back, but we can appreciate things for the value they have now. MANY of the kids I teach now get the same imaginative light in their eyes when they "play Star Wars" now as I did when I was a kid, and in that sense, the new movies have done their job. The value that I get out of them is the no different than the value those people who camp out for week on end to see the newest film get: a couple of hours to think back with fond memories about the things we grew up loving, and which helped to evolve our imaginations into what they are now.

    4. Re:Ah, the irony by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      No, I mean even the story is what you'd enjoy the most at that age.

      Think about it. As a kind you think you'll grow up to be the greatest man/woman/whatever that ever walked the Earth. You know you're better than those boring old people. You also still believe the world is as simple as good-vs-evil, young super-heroes against old arch-villains, and all that. The rebels being the good ones is a bonus.

      There's a reason old Obi Wan has to die, for Luke to succeed where he failed. Or why your typical Sith (Palpatine, Count Dooku, etc) looks like he's 1000 years old. (In fact, if you've played SW games like KOTOR, going dark side _makes_ you look old.)

      You also have a lot less trouble accepting stories that don't even make any sense.

      Basically Lucas is IMHO a genius when it comes to telling a story to _kids_. (By that, of course, including half of us males up to the late twenties or so;)

      Would I have loved Episode 4 back then? Hell yeah, I'd bet my soul on that.

      But then slowly growing up kinda creeps up on one. You start realizing things. Like that the volume knob also goes to the left. Or that you're not the Chosen One. That the ugly duckling more realistically grows into a bitter and lonely adult duck.

      And you start expecting more from a story than the rushed Episode 4.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    5. Re:Ah, the irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you about it being good for kids, but even adults were blown away by the special effects at the time. And there was very little sci-fi in the theatres in that time. Star Wars brought it in big and took the scope to a new level. Kids weren't the only ones impressed by the film, they just didn't realize how bad the acting was like the adults did, and enjoyed the story more. But the adults were definitely impressed with the other areas.

  127. John Podhoretz hated it. by mosel-saar-ruwer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Either way, I have never trusted a movie review from anyone but a close friend who I know is reliable. I have yet to find a movie critic whos opinions are consistant with my tastes.

    John Podhoretz just posted a warning:

    It opens next week. I saw it, and here's the thing: It's unbelievably bad. O I'm telling you this because movie critics won't. So far all the early reviews -- all of them, from Variety to the Hollywood Reporter to Time magazine -- have been favorable. Why? Because while the movie critics of my long-ago youth were middlebrow snobs suspicious of populist entertainment, today's critics have turned into toadies. They are afraid of being on an audience's bad side, afraid that a movie they will pan might really strike a chord. Since it's a foregone conclusion that the final Star Wars is going to make a jillion dollars, the safe thing for critics to do is say nice things about it. The only nice thing I can think to say about it is that it's not quite as mindspinningly wretched as its predecessor, Attack of the Clones, but it's plenty awful anyway. Even Yoda gives a rotten performance. Go see it if you must when it opens next week, but at least you got one fair warning here.
    WARNING: He also gives a Jar-Jar spoiler in a later reply.

    1. Re:John Podhoretz hated it. by Clock+Nova · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Considering the website on which that "review" was posted, I think Mr. Podhoretz's opinions are unsurprising.

      From some of the existing reviews:

      " imagine that Revenge of the Sith is very much the film Lucas's fans want to see, but are some of them ready for an anti-Bush diatribe? Though every Star Wars film until now has existed in an insular comic-book world, a lot has happened since 1999 and 2002 in the real world and Lucas dares, for the first time, to address how the hollow political conflict in his franchise correlates with the reality outside its panels. (It would have been stupid not to strike a parallel.) Revenge of the Sith's two greatest moments tap into the uncertainty of our own political climate: the dazzling battle between Yoda and Darth Sidious (an outstanding Ian McDiarmid) inside the beautifully spiraling Senate hall evokes Democrats and Republicans scrambling for power and, during an obscenely over-the-top duel in Mustafar, Obi-Wan (Ewan McGregor) declares, "Only a Sith Lord deals in absolutes," after Anakin says, "If you're not with me, you're my enemy." Lucas's political gestures would be easier to appreciate if he himself didn't trade in absolutes and generalities (you know the drill: the darker the couture, the closer you are to the dark side), but it's still a welcome step forward. Pity we had to wait so long for it, but, as they say, better late than never. "

      "This glimpse of intergalactic hell inspires moments of epic grandeur that haven't been felt since "The Empire Strikes Back." It's hard not to feel that Lucas's engagement with this story has a contemporary urgency, as line after pointed line invites us to see a parallel with today's wartime climate. As the Senate cedes power to Palpatine under the guise of intergalactic security, Natalie Portman's Princess Padme exclaims bitterly, "So this is how liberty dies--to thunderous applause.""

      And my personal favorite:

      "With familiar rhetoric, Palpatine declares the end of the Republic: in the name of peace, freedom, democracy, and security, he must accept the burden of power. Devastated, Padme remarks: "So this is how liberty dies... with thunderous applause." It is a shockingly serious moment, bitter and real. But the film's bluntest political statement comes when Anakin, lightsaber in hand, paraphrases George W. Bush's first State of the Union Address: "If you're not with me, then you're my enemy!" Obi-Wan, representing the forces of good, doesn't flip-flop. His damning answer? "Only a Sith deals in absolutes!" Mark my words: somebody is going to put that on a bumper sticker."

      I think neocons are going to have a hard time with this one. Everyone else should enjoy it, though... so long as they can get the last two prequels out of their minds.

      --
      There they were, sitting in the van with all those dials, and the cat was dead. -V. Marchetti, CIA
    2. Re:John Podhoretz hated it. by flyingsquid · · Score: 3, Funny
      But the film's bluntest political statement comes when Anakin, lightsaber in hand, paraphrases George W. Bush's first State of the Union Address: "If you're not with me, then you're my enemy!" Obi-Wan, representing the forces of good, doesn't flip-flop. His damning answer? "Only a Sith deals in absolutes!" Mark my words: somebody is going to put that on a bumper sticker."

      I personally find comparisons between Star Wars and modern politics to be a bit of a stretch.

      With the possible exception of the time that Dick Cheney used the force to choke Colin Powell. That, and Karl Rove's ability to shoot blue lightning out of his fingertips.

    3. Re:John Podhoretz hated it. by Clock+Nova · · Score: 1

      Well, most of the reviews I have read so far have made the comparison, and most didn't seem to think it was a bad thing. I'd like to think that I'll be able to see the movie, at least for the first time, without making the comparison, but I doubt that will be possible.

      And, for the record, none of my posts on this topic were meant as flames towards /.'s more conservative readers. I'm just stating the obvious, as the reviewers see it.

      --
      There they were, sitting in the van with all those dials, and the cat was dead. -V. Marchetti, CIA
    4. Re:John Podhoretz hated it. by Kelson · · Score: 1

      But the film's bluntest political statement comes when Anakin, lightsaber in hand, paraphrases George W. Bush's first State of the Union Address: "If you're not with me, then you're my enemy!"

      Please. The phrase "If you're not with us, you're against us" has got to be hundreds of years old. If not, it's at least decades.

      Do a little digging, I'm sure you can find prior art long before 2000.

    5. Re:John Podhoretz hated it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A neocon is a conservative who adopts particular classical liberal points to moderate his position.

      Just thought it would be important to understand that. I mean, Bush isn't exactly a right winger.

    6. Re:John Podhoretz hated it. by Clock+Nova · · Score: 1

      You have got to be kidding me.

      --
      There they were, sitting in the van with all those dials, and the cat was dead. -V. Marchetti, CIA
    7. Re:John Podhoretz hated it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FWIW, I am a Right-Wing Neocon who voted for Bush, reads Commentary Magazine, and thinks the Iraq war was only a good start. And I saw the movie a few days ago and LOVED IT!

    8. Re:John Podhoretz hated it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From Matthew (KJV):
      25And Jesus knew their thoughts, and said unto them, Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand:

      26And if Satan cast out Satan, he is divided against himself; how shall then his kingdom stand?

      27And if I by Beelzebub cast out devils, by whom do your children cast them out? therefore they shall be your judges.

      28But if I cast out devils by the Spirit of God, then the kingdom of God is come unto you.

      29Or else how can one enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he first bind the strong man? and then he will spoil his house.

      30He that is not with me is against me; and he that gathereth not with me scattereth abroad.

    9. Re:John Podhoretz hated it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neo-cons are, for the most part, ex-Troskite leftists, and/or ex-liberal Democrats, who moved over to the Republican Party and the "conservative" movement due to the Cold War, and who have since taken over the conservative movement and turned it into everything conservatives once hated: One Worlders, World Policemen, Nanny State Totalitarians, Imperialists, Big Government Do Gooders, and the like.

      A lot of the Neo-Cons are also followers of Leo Strauss, admirer of Plato's "noble lie" who believe that the people have to be lied to and deceived "for their own good" so it's not hard to imagine these people as admirers of the Star Wars Empire and the Sith/Dark Side.

      Neo-Cons are also heavily - how do we put this delicately? - heavily Jewish and all of them - Jew or gentile - are rabidly Zionist and pro-Israel, of the extreme Likudnik variety, such that calling them "dual loyalist" would be an insult to dual loyalists, since that would imply that they were at least half loyal to the USA, which they are not.

      These people have about as much to do with traditional American conservatives as termites have to do with architecture.

      They don't call Podhoretz's followers "Pod People" for nothing.

    10. Re:John Podhoretz hated it. by Clock+Nova · · Score: 1

      Wow... uh... thanks. I think.

      --
      There they were, sitting in the van with all those dials, and the cat was dead. -V. Marchetti, CIA
    11. Re:John Podhoretz hated it. by Clock+Nova · · Score: 1

      What's your point? All you've done is prove to me that my opinion that religion is the source of most of society's evils is a valid one. But this has nothing to do with Star Wars.

      --
      There they were, sitting in the van with all those dials, and the cat was dead. -V. Marchetti, CIA
    12. Re:John Podhoretz hated it. by Dabido · · Score: 1

      Matthew 12:30 & Luke 11:21
      "He who is not with me is againts me, and he who does not gather with me scatters."

      Or the other way around ...

      Mark 9:38 - 41
      "Teacher," said John, "We saw a man driving out demons in your name and we told him to stop, because he was not one of us."
      "Do not stop him," Jesus said. "No one who does a miracle in my name can in the next moment say anything bad about me, for whoever is not against us is for us. I tell you the truth, anyone who gives you a cup of water in my name because you belong to Christ will certainly not lose his reward."

      Sounds like someone's rippin' off Jesus! Wonder if he'd sue! :-)

      --
      Sure enough, the cow costume was hanging up next to the superhero outfit and sailors uniform. (S,Spud)
    13. Re:John Podhoretz hated it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the point is that it was stated 2000 years before George Bush used it and 2000 years before Revenge of the Sith. Jesus however was not a Sith Lord since He only did good. You know, healing all who asked, feeding the poor, proclaiming salvation from sin, dying under the judgment of God in the place of his people,etc.

      One last point...Doesn't the Jedi deal with absolutes also? In fact if you don't stand for any absolutes then you can't stand for anything. I thought the Jedi were the Good guys because they believed in the absolute of Freedom and anything that would take away that freedom would be 'evil'. That is an absolute.

      I think that line by Obi Wan was somewhat ignorant, but I'll forgive him since he was under considerable stress, you know with having to destroy his best friend and all. :)

  128. would make a great screensaver... by shadeyk · · Score: 1

    Saw it at a media preview. I was disapointed, and at the end everyone just got up and left. No clapping, cheers, what-not. Just got up and left. Several times on the way out I heard the term "cheese" used.

    Each scene looked great, but they didn't tie together as a story, no real character development. So, would make a great screen saver.

    Also, I don't think Lucas achieved a good balance of humour and tension. Reminded me of the ROTJedi, where the ewoks kept making silly sounds. Distracted from the weight of what was going on. At least with the original ESBack, the absence of these childish sounds made the whole film build in tension. And, er, Lucas didn't direct it (thank god!).

    my $0.02
  129. I SAY this WITHOUT SHAME! by M.C.+Hampster · · Score: 1

    Damnit, I LOVE Return of the Jedi. In fact, it is still my favorite of the original triology. So take THAT!

    In fact, just to rub it in, I LOVED the Ewoks. Greatest alien race ever !

    --
    Forget the whales - save the babies.
    1. Re:I SAY this WITHOUT SHAME! by frenchgates · · Score: 1
      --
      Syntax error: loose != lose, affect != effect, then!=than
    2. Re:I SAY this WITHOUT SHAME! by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
      I liked TESB a bit better, if only because it was a bit "darker" and had more sequences where Vader was giving his admirals and generals static. And you can't beat that battle sequence in Hoth, though the whole Yoda thing gets a bit tiresome.

      I didn't dislike the Ewoks as so many people did, but I thought they were too cute (as opposed to obnoxious like Jar-Jar).

    3. Re:I SAY this WITHOUT SHAME! by AussieVamp2 · · Score: 0

      Wookies > Ewoks

      Wookies. Big very furry aliens who roar (and rip off limbs).

      Ewoks. Small very furry aliens who don't roar (or rip off limbs).

  130. What are the chances... by McFadden · · Score: 1
    And the Oscar(tm) goes to....

    Get your bets on now. I have a feeling Hollywood is waiting to honor this guy just for his box office revenues alone.

  131. Wow ! by krelian · · Score: 1

    You can clearly see the amazing effect it had on his career. Just like the slashdot effect...

  132. I know a friend who refuses to see it by cfalcon · · Score: 1

    He hated EP1 so much that he refused to see EP2, won't even take a .avi and watch it for free. Claims Lucas is a horrible hack who doesn't deserve his time anymore.

    I'm trying to persuade him to see 2 and 3, because 2 was good and 3 has the possibility of awesomeness.

  133. My journey to the Light side by DanTheLewis · · Score: 1

    I saw Episode 1 on opening night (ticket 13 at the Varsity in Seattle's U District). Hated it! Then I had to see it again that weekend and actually fell asleep during the pod race. It didn't ruin my childhood since I wasn't even born when Episode 4 came out, but it ruined my young adulthood for about a week.

    I did boycott Episode 2 and still haven't seen it.

    I might give 2 a try on background for this new movie, since 3 has been reviewed better. It looks much darker and more appealing to me.

    --

    Q: What did the comedian say to the crowd?
    A: If I knew, this joke would be funny.
  134. Revisionist History by UnHolyRam · · Score: 1
    There is an interview with Lucas here: http://www.freep.com/news/latestnews/pm3907_200504 26.htm in which he describes the story behind the story.

    Gee there's a surprise, a guy who is a master at revisionist history, see all the bastardizations of the original trilogy, had an interview in 2005 that's contrary to what was said in an interview in the late 90's. Of course he says now that there was never any story post ROTJ, it suits his life better to not have further story.

    When he first announced that he was doing Ep's 1, 2, 3 it suited his life at the time to also say he was planning 7, 8, and 9.

    Why should it surprise anyone that he now says there's no story past ROTJ. It's not like he hasn't changed his story before. After all just ask my posts Great Great Great Grandparent

    1. Re:Revisionist History by CountBrass · · Score: 2, Funny
      Man comes up to me and says: "I'm a wigwam, I'm a teepee, I'm a wigwam, I'm a teeper."

      I said to him, man, relax: your two tense[1].

      And so are you.

      [1]Thanks Blizz.

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
  135. You aren't very good at English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    A contraction only counts as one word.

  136. And American Graffiti by mandrake*rpgdx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    also had some great writing and acting in it. Same with that other indie flick he did (THX-9087980 or whatever it was called).

    Maybe he just sucks at making Star Wars films.

  137. Any bets on how long we'll have to wait... by stygar · · Score: 1

    ...before we find out who the ghostwriter on the script was?

  138. Kinda disappointing.. kinda. by DroopyStonx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'd say the only disappointing aspect of this movie is lack of Vader himself in his suit. Sure, Anakin technically becomes Darth Vader before the shit hits the fan, but it's not the same without the suit. Even then it's not disappointing considering what happens before it, but it just makes you want more.

    It'd be nice to see more of Vader himself going ape shit, but you only end up seeing that in the last few minutes when he awakens after being operated on and learning about what had happened. I mean, you'd expect some scenes containing mass genocide or some form of magnificent display of "Hey, I'm the most powerful being in the known galaxy, watch me as I fuck you up big time."

    You see all these amazing movies that the human Vader has that the mechanical Vader never uses in the later movies. It would just be nice to see mechanical Vader utilize all these swift "magical" moves that apparently have deteriorated over time.

    --
    We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
    1. Re:Kinda disappointing.. kinda. by DarkHelmet · · Score: 1
      You see all these amazing movies [moves?] that the human Vader has that the mechanical Vader never uses in the later movies. It would just be nice to see mechanical Vader utilize all these swift "magical" moves that apparently have deteriorated over time.

      So let me get this straight... After being operated on, burned horribly, requiring a suit to breathe, and transformed into mostly machine, Vader is supposed to be as mobile as Anikin Skywalker?

      Part of what doesn't jive with me in Episodes 2 and 3, is that the most powerful of the Jedi aren't supposed to be so mobile. They use the force to do their bidding. Take for instance, Yoda lifting the ship, and the Emperor frying Luke Skywalker at the end of episode 6.

      In Episodes 4 and 5, Vader uses the force to do his bidding. He chokes admirals, rather than doing 20 backflips and chopping the fellow's head off.

      --
      /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    2. Re:Kinda disappointing.. kinda. by davew2040 · · Score: 1

      Did it occur to you that although we all know that Anakin turns into Vader, discussing exactly when and for how long this occurs might be considered a spoiler?

    3. Re:Kinda disappointing.. kinda. by DroopyStonx · · Score: 1

      You clicked the post. You chose to read it.

      You saw the subject "Kinda disappointing.. kinda" with the first sentence more or less saying "spoilers to come"... ...but yes, it did occur to me. The point is I don't give a damn.

      --
      We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
  139. Darth Vader. Who gives a Sith? by DroopyStonx · · Score: 1

    Darth Vader
    Maybe not now but sometime later
    You're very phallic
    You're big, black and metallic
    Only you could be so bold

    Lord Vader
    Fuckin' shit up with your light saber
    You're but the learner
    But now you're very much gayer
    I sence a disturbance in my ass

    Darth Vader

    --
    We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
  140. Actually by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    after that he said "oh, all the time I only intended there to be six. It's just the story of Anakin Skywalker. I never planned for anything after that."

    He's such a fucking bullshit artist.

    --

    +++ATH0
  141. Re:PG-13: what arrogance!!! by east+coast · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'll be damned if I'm going to have my six year witness the "slaughter" at the Jedi Temple, or give him nightmares from the violence.

    Not that I plan to see the film, but at least that will be one less brat ruining it for everyone else in the theater.

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  142. duh by Da_Big_G · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Name one movie where the pre-release reviews weren't positive. The film companies control what gets said about their movies and they're not about to let some critic slam their film before the public's paid millions to see it. And if a critic DID write a negative pre-release review, he'd never get to see another pre-release.

  143. They still fence in the Olympics. by khasim · · Score: 1
    Think this through. In melee combat, proximity negates skill. At some point, Yoda would have been cut down if "he just stood there". Yoda HAD to move.
    I think you're getting your references from too many movies.

    Watch an Olympic fencing match. They don't dance. Yet that's 100% "melee combat" and they are highly skilled.

    If you simply must rely upon movies, at least rely upon good Japanese movies. For example, contrast the final katana battle in Sanjuro (by Akira Kurosawa) between the good guy and the bad guy with any of the light saber duels in Star Wars. Sanjuro's fight lasted one pass.

    The Star Wars audience doesn't want realism. They want flash. They want the long sword fights with dialog and dance and daring leaps!

    Which is why showing Yoda as a true master instead of a bouncing ball would have been a memorable contrast and helped to define his character.
    1. Re:They still fence in the Olympics. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Watch an Olympic fencing match. They don't dance. Yet that's 100% "melee combat" and they are highly skilled.

      they're also on a pretty narrow strip that they arent allowed to leave. When not limited to a strip, angles and position on your opponent do matter. ( which is not to say people dance around like monkeys on speed, just pointing out that fencing forces a straight on, linear attack).

      I wasnt really happy with the way yoda's fight scene was done, but the rest of the fight scenes in the movies are pretty credible. I loved Darth Maul's fight against Qui-Gon and Obi-Wan (up until the way he died. it was too out of place with the competence he had shown up to that point).

  144. Exactly. by geoffrobinson · · Score: 1

    My thoughts exactly. However, I saw the 3rd Matrix out of the sincere hope it would salvage the trilogy. It didn't.

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
  145. Screenplays by zentinal · · Score: 1
    The problem is that a script is supposed to be a just a guideline. A script by itself is nothing.. it takes a lot to bring it to life .. and a good chunk of that is the direction.
    The second point is valid. The first one, however, is erroneous at best, at least as far as feature length films go.

    Great movies typically (so much so that I invite the suggestions of counter-examples) start with great scripts. Chinatown, Lawrence of Arabia, Bladerunner, Alien, and on, and on. In fact, there is an ongoing debate as to whether or not screenplays should be considered and studied as their own particular form of literature. It is arguably more than just a guideline.

    You are totally correct though regarding the importance and power of direction, auteur theory and all that. Without excellent direction (and all that entails), a great screenplay can easily end up as a drecky movie. Conversely, the best direction in the world (afaik) can't save a drecky screenplay.

  146. And George said "Give 'em low standards..." by TheGazelle7 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    George Lucas has employed brilliant marketing techniques by lowering the standards. He realized, the lower he set the bar, the better his chances that one of the films would succeed. Clearly, the bar could not have been any lower after the gems that were Episodes I and II!

    Folks... This is going to be the BEST DAMNED STAR WARS MOVIE since episode II :-)

    1. Re:And George said "Give 'em low standards..." by padmeamanda13 · · Score: 1

      It's the best Star Wars movie EVER. :) I saw it last night... will see it again on Opening night.

  147. YIPEEEEE!!! by Craig_P92669 · · Score: 0

    JAR JAR BINKS [John Podhoretz] Jonah, I fear I can't resist a spoiler. As you may recall, Jar Jar became a senator in the last film. In the new one, he refuses the Majority Leader's request to change a galactic rule that is being misused to deny Obi-Wan Kenobi a seat on the Jedi Council, and as a direct result of his cowardice is swallowed whole by Jabba the Hut. Posted at 10:53 AM

    --
    http://xs4.xs.to/pics/04481/p556222.gif
  148. Joss Whedon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Today's PVP comic seems very appropriate.

    Vader Geek: It's too late for me, son. Joss Whedon is my master now.

  149. Simple answer: by jafac · · Score: 1

    Reviewers on the take.

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  150. Why he got it right by superultra · · Score: 1

    My guess is that he tried to stretch one, maybe two, movies into three to just be symmetrical (or make more money?). There's a lot in the first two that are just filler and lame "foreshadowing." With Episode III he's finally getting to the story he's had floating around in his head all this time.

  151. Reference? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You do realize its good form to post a link, right?

    1. Re:Reference? by Clock+Nova · · Score: 1

      Sorry about that.

      The first excerpt came from this review.

      The second excerpt came from this review.

      But all of them are collected on rotten tomatoes.

      The third excert came from this review.

      --
      There they were, sitting in the van with all those dials, and the cat was dead. -V. Marchetti, CIA
  152. Forget the originals... by wormbin · · Score: 1

    Pretend episodes IV, V and VI don't exist and watch episodes I and II.

    Was the story riveting?

    Do you like the dialog?

    Good acting?

    Be honest, by any measure, the first two prequels were terrible.

  153. Reference? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not post a link so that the rest of us can appreciate your fine-tuned searching skills?

  154. Maybe Georgie got it right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    C'mon. They're HIS movies. George Lucas can't possibly get a Star Wars movie wrong. He's the one that invented the concept.

    If you feel that he does, no one is dragging you to the theatre to see it. He doesn't care whether you like the movies or not. He makes movies for himself and his core audience, kids age 10 and up (at least til this PG-13).

    Like Mark Hamill says, "Get over it, it's just a movie."

    Don't like Jar Jar, or Ewoks? Tough, kids love'em. Lucas would put thousands more if it worked with the script. I always had issues with the gay awards ceremonies at the end of them. I am not gonna say they ruin the movies, because they don't. I don't like it, I walk out after the action is done. No big deal. I am not going to say he did something wrong just because I didn't like it.

    I have to say, I agree with him. They're HIS movies, not yours. Everyone has an idea about what Star Wars should be. IMHO they should be whatever George decides should make the final cut. He doesn't owe anyone anything. He also reserves the right to change them anyway he sees fit for DVD. If you don't like it, don't buy the DVD.

    My 2 cents...

    In my book he could cut them to pieces and turn Boba Fett into Han Solo, it's still a good story.

    l8,
    AC

  155. Bank Account by notcreative · · Score: 1

    The bank called and said they ran out of zeroes, so Lucas has no motivation to make any more movies.

    1. Re:Bank Account by QMO · · Score: 1

      As far as my account balance and deposits are concerned the bank is welcome to substitute nines or any other non-zero digit whenever they run out of zeros.

      For withdrawals, I prefer zeros. Non-zeros may not be substituted for zeros, but zeros may be used in place of non-zero deposit numbers.

      --
      Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
  156. Re:PG-13: what arrogance!!! by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

    I could be wrong, but I don't recall reading anywhere that parents must take their children to this movie. If you knew anything about the story, you would've seen the PG-13 rating coming about 5 years ago. Unfortunately, the movie would really suck if all the sudden yoda tells obi-wan that all other jedi are dead... end of movie.

    --
    "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
  157. Where are the spoiler tags? by Zunni · · Score: 1

    It tells the story of Anakin Skywalker (Canada's Hayden Christensen), the Jedi Knight who turns to the Dark Side of the Force and becomes the cyborg villain Darth Vader. Are "spoiler" tags too much to ask for??? Now the whole movies ruined... ... ... .... :)

    1. Re:Where are the spoiler tags? by EddieBurkett · · Score: 1
      It tells the story of Anakin Skywalker (Canada's Hayden Christensen), the Jedi Knight who turns to the Dark Side of the Force and becomes the cyborg villain Darth Vader. Are "spoiler" tags too much to ask for??? Now the whole movies ruined... ... ... .... :)
      I know!!! Now I'm not going to be shocked at the end when we find out Vader is really Canadian...
      --
      The only thing I hate more than hypocrites are people who hate hypocrites.
    2. Re:Where are the spoiler tags? by inkswamp · · Score: 1
      I know!!! Now I'm not going to be shocked at the end when we find out Vader is really Canadian...

      "Commander, tear this ship apart until you've found those plans, and bring me the prisoners. I want them alive, eh?"

      --
      --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
  158. There was... Tom Stoppard by Gadgetfreak · · Score: 1

    British playwright, famous for "Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead" helped with the lines for the movie.

    --
    "No fair, you changed the outcome by measuring it!" - Professor Hubert J. Farnsworth
  159. Darth Brooks... by RavenLrD20k · · Score: 1

    Actually, I always thought that he was Lord Helmet's Master and Teacher in the workings of the Dark Side of the Schwartz.

  160. duh, indeed by rizzo5 · · Score: 1
    I'll name one, Monster-in-Law. It hasn't opened yet and it's getting pre-release reviews like:
    "A deeply dispiriting movie, not just because it is grindingly bad but because Jane Fonda actually chose this for her comeback after a 15-year absence from the screen."
    -- Kirk Honeycutt, HOLLYWOOD REPORTER
    and
    "The experience of viewing this movie represents a one-way ticket into tedium and a forced 90-minute imprisonment with Jennifer Lopez and Jane Fonda, both of whom give performances that can charitably be called cringe-inducing."
    -- James Berardinelli, REELVIEWS
    I swear James Berardinelli is one of those that I see quoted in countless ads for mediocre movies, so if he's saying that... ouch.

    And really, this is nothing uncommon. It's only the really really bad movies that studios will withhold fram pre-release reviews, because they know they don't have the kind of power to do what the parent is suggesting and that they wouldn't be able to stop a mountain of bad pre-release buzz. I think the parent is expressing a rather paranoid view of the movie industry, but I suppose with what the average /. user knows about them, that's to be expected. But reviewers are one group of people the studios want to stay on the good side of, so they don't tend to bully them.

  161. Clone Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How sucky the Jedi were in episode 1 and 2 becomes clear if you watch the Clone Wars cartoon. The cartoons were fucking awesome -- it really portrays the Jesi as they should have been.

    Of course, I really like Samurai Jack too, and both were done by Genndy Tartakovsky.

  162. Suprisingly good reviews from basements everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    FLASH

    In a shocking development, a surprising proportion of reviews of the latest Star Wars movie by males living in their parent's basement are positive, sometimes effusively so.

  163. Re: Surprising by teal_ · · Score: 1

    I enjoyed the first two prequels, I don't care what anybody says about them. I just have one itty bitty question about a possible plothole though:

    1. Obi-Wan goes to Kamino and sees a clone army in the works, finds that it's based on Jango Fett

    2. Follows Jango Fett to Geonosis where he sees that a droid army is in the works, finds Jango hanging out with Count Dooku.

    I ain't a Jedi or nuthin', but seems to me Obi-Wan and his Jedi buddies should have put two and two together there, that the two armies were being financed by the same people.

    I cannot wait for ep III. I have my ticket for the midnight show, the 10:40 AM show the next day, and the 10:30 PM show. Gonna be sweeeeeeet!! Yes, it's sad, I even took a precious vacation day off of work to do this.

  164. Strongly agreed. Mod parent up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Strongly agreed. Mod parent up.

  165. Top 10 Other Things That Han Shot by Listen+Up · · Score: 2, Funny
    1. Re:Top 10 Other Things That Han Shot by Golias · · Score: 1

      Han never shot the Tauntaun. It froze to death, and then Han sliced the fresh corpse open with Luke's lightsaber to create a warm, gooey sleeping bag.

      Otherwise, a great article.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  166. The source of my Hitler reference. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    I was more referring to the distinctly-dressing religious minority being hunted down and killed by fascists led by a fella with some Jedi heritage of his own.

    The whole story is a little horrifying if you think about it for long enough.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  167. Band-Aid Principle by dmatos · · Score: 1

    This is one of the movies that I'm going to see on the band-aid principle. It's probably going to hurt, but you have to take it off eventually, so you might as well just get it done. If it doesn't hurt, well hey, you just got lucky.

    Other movies that fall into this category: Matrix sequels and any movie adaptation of your favourite novels.

    --

    It may look like I'm doing nothing, but I'm actively waiting for my problems to go away.
    --Scott Adams
  168. Re:PG-13: what arrogance!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I find teens and adults much more obnoxious at the movies than young children.

    That said, make your kids wait a few years before seeing it. Many of us have had to wait thirty, so it can be done. And by the way, don't get them started on Harry Potter; you'll have to stop them short on that, too.

  169. I saw it by linuxwrangler · · Score: 1

    last weekend (a friend works for ILM). It is most definitely the best of the recent three. The progression toward the creation of the Empire and the conversion of Anikin to Darth is nicely done and the creation of the Empire bears a scary resemblance to current US politics.

    One scene (you'll know it when you see it) was distractingly similar to the Black Night scene in "Holy Grail" and given that this one ends roughly 20 years before Episode IV one can quibble about the age of a couple of the characters. Manikin Skywalker is as wooden as ever but all in all it was a fun time.

    The biggest problem was that the early morning line snaked way too close to Starbucks leading many of us to drink way too much of the dark stuff right before a 2.5 hour movie. And when you see movies with the movie-makers _nobody_ leaves before the last credit scrolls off the screen.

    --

    ~~~~~~~
    "You are not remembered for doing what is expected of you." - Atul Chitnis
    1. Re:I saw it by micromuncher · · Score: 1

      whoa you mean not a soul went to take a whizz? it must be the best movie ever!

      --
      /\/\icro/\/\uncher
  170. Highlander 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, if you thought SW I was bad, you need to see
    Highlander 2. Now that movie did rape my childhood it was so bad.

  171. Re:PG-13: what arrogance!!! by grassy_knoll · · Score: 1

    Not that I plan to see the film, but at least that will be one less brat ruining it for everyone else in the theater.

    Amen.

  172. There will be a need for a wet fish. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember to bring a wet and preferably smelly fish when you go to see Episode III.

    Then if anyone in the audience is actually "surprised" when Senator Palpatine is revealed as the dark lord of the Sith, hit them with the fish.

    If they complain, tell them the dark side made you do it.

  173. Obligatory by snuf23 · · Score: 3, Funny

    "There should have been only one."

    --
    Sometimes my arms bend back.
  174. Yes, I agree with you. by orichter · · Score: 1

    I also like to form my own opinions.

  175. Lucas Ruined Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whatever you rabid fanboys think (they seem to be coming out of the woodwork like furious termites--all due to a couple of grudgingly positive reviews) Lucas ruined the Star Wars universe. Once his initial vision was born, it should've been taken away from him by someone with a few more brains. He's currently an ego-maniacal control freak that doesn't have a clue how to make a movie. If you can honestly say that E1 and E2 were good films, then you have smoked more than your fair share of crack.

  176. Disagree and Agree by vortex2.71 · · Score: 1

    Okay, I have to disagree with 3 and agree with 5..

    "3) Yoda bounces around like a $10 toy from the bratstore? Yoda was supposed to be literally *awesome* if you did piss him off. Not comical. Yoda should have opened his robes, and anywhere from 6-20 lightsabers just levitate outward from him and activate. The bad guy (Darth Brooks? I forget his name) would have to do everything he can to not be mowed down by the cloud of spinning lightsabers biting at him from every side, even the distractions he might throw at Yoda would be smacked away. Let him escape, sure. But make it look like the guy beat the 100,000 to 1 odds in doing so."

    Everyone seems to miss this point but it is cruscial to understanding Star Wars: GOOD JEDIS DO NOT USE THE FORCE TO ATTACK, ONLY TO DEFEND. So ther is no way that Yoda could levitate light sabors and attack with them. We've only really ever seen a Jedi kill a real person when they get angry and turn to the dark side momentarily.

    5) The big Jedi battle against whatever those things were. They have to be rescued by storm troopers? Mace Windex runs around like a fat man, out of breath, sloppily hacking at things like one of the three stooges would swat at a bee. Some of these Jedi get nailed without ever even seeing it coming. It was so lame. If they can't squash an army that has less than 50 attackers per Jedi, then it's just plain dumb. You get the impression in the first 3 that if the Death Star coughs, Vader will go down to the surface and destroy the damn planet himself. With one arm tied around his back. He might be one of the most powerful ever, but the other Jedis should be with in a few orders of magnitude of that.

    I agree with this whole heartedly! My wife and I always envisioned some sort of symbiotic choreographed attack that they would direct via telekinesis.

    1. Re:Disagree and Agree by evilviper · · Score: 1
      GOOD JEDIS DO NOT USE THE FORCE TO ATTACK, ONLY TO DEFEND.

      Go watch the first 15 minutes of Episode 1, and realize how completely moronic that sounds.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  177. /. summary by exoir · · Score: 0
    Every Star Wars post generates the same comments so here's the summary:

    the 1st two sucked
    only ANH/ESB was best
    Jar Jar (insert joke here)
    Lucas destroyed my childhood memories
    Star Wars isn't science fiction
    Star Wars was made for children not 30 year old "comic book guys"
    I won't watch it
    I won't buy the DVDs
    Lucas is greedy
    Han fired first

  178. Insightful? by serjinn · · Score: 0

    Parent is +5 Insightful? Give me a break, he just wrote a bunch of words! Stupid poopy-head.

  179. I've been waiting 28 years. by bored_geek · · Score: 1

    I've been wondering how Vader became Vader since I saw "A New Hope" (Star Wars to us old farts) when I was 17. I'm going to see see this film if I have to sneak out of work and ware a disguise. Oh wait, they'll think I'm just another geek!

  180. Oh, Dude! I am SO there! by DG · · Score: 1

    Good Lord 'n' butter you got that right!

    I remember being SO geeked that a new Highlander movie was coming out. I dragged my then-girlfriend to it, telling her how amazing the first movie had been, and how much she was going to love this... ...and then sat through 90-odd minutes of the worst tripe I could possibly imagine. I was gobsmacked throughout the movie. I could not believe that anything I was watching had ANYTHING to do with the Highlander movie I loved so much.

    That sequel is so heinous, so putrid, so amazingly BAD that it deserves some sort of warning label on the dust jacket of the DVD.

    It makes the Matrix sequels seem brilliant. It's THAT bad.

    DG

    --
    Want to learn about race cars? Read my Book
  181. "The Simpsons" has done every possible joke... by MojoStan · · Score: 1

    Bart: That sucked.
    Lisa: I can't believe 'The Gathering Shadow' was senate redistricting.
    Jeff Albertson (aka Comic Book Guy): Worst Cosmic Wars Ever !! I will only see it three more times ... today.

    --
    TO START
    PRESS ANY KEY

    Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

  182. What about Meow Skywalker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You god damn wait. I want to see how you fuckers defend his "vision" when that son of a bitch comes out with Meow Skywalker.

  183. Overanalyzing by TychoCelchuuu · · Score: 1

    You're all overanalyzing this. Star Wars was made for kids; 10 year olds like Lucas was when he watched Buck Rodgers. It's a kid's movie, and that's why it's not so amazing if you watch it for the first time as an adult.

    --
    Against stupidity the Gods themselves contend in vain.
  184. Return of the Jedi was on TV last weekend... by ZeppelinChild · · Score: 0

    and I forgot just how deep the cringe went when Han is talking to Lando about the Falcon.."Not a scratch, right buddy?". UGH. But it's still a great movie. I was talking to a friend of mine and we were both wary of Star Wars talkin' ,because The Net has taught us that George Lucas hasn't done anything good since Empire, and we were both pleasantly surprised that a)we both liked watching the Special Editions more than the original - I like the huge Death Star explosion, and more importantly Palpatine instead of oldladymonkey in Empire b)We thought the prequels were pretty good and c)we both saw all Star Wars movies as fantastic entertainment, certainly with flaws and problems but who cares! What are we gonna do, watch Bridget Jones Diary with our wives!??!?! Screw that!

  185. Re:PG-13: what arrogance!!! by ZeppelinChild · · Score: 0

    Well, that's what the rating system is for, I thought. Star Wars was originally going to be a G rated movie but when Lucas saw some Fox exec's daughter crying from fear of Darth Vadar he changed it to PG. I was hoping Attack Of The Clones would be NC-17, myself. I wanted to see the Holy Conception of Luke and Leia, preferably with "wah-wah" disco music...

  186. BBC REVIEW QUOTE: "SHOCKINGLY NAFF" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More quotes:

    "ridiculous"
    "gratuitous acts of violence"
    "oddly flat"
    "dull"
    "Cheesy lines make a comeback"
    "The biggest annoyance comes from ... Yoda"
    "you'll be desperate for the little green sage to shut up"
    "There are probably more lame utterances in this film than the other five put together"

  187. Finally We Discover by f0rt0r · · Score: 1

    Between Vader and Kenobi, who's Schwartz is bigger!

    --
    I can't afford a sig!
  188. Not to be too trendy but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Am I the only one who thinks this film will be da shiznith?

    Sorry, had to be done.

    --jd

  189. Attention: Prequel haters by inkswamp · · Score: 1
    Those of you who spend a significant amount of your spare time bashing the prequels, you all need to read this.

    Don't feel bad if you get uncomfortable while reading it. It's called logic. You're not used to seeing so much of it in one place concerning this film. He uses it throughout. You'll get used to it.

    --
    --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
  190. Re:Tell you what I'm doing -- Netflix by leifbk · · Score: 1

    Or please, describe how sneaky Obi Wan was to park his ship right outside the enemy hideout's entrance and then to stand outside it and send his spy message back to the council.

    Never attribute to sneakiness that which can be adequately explained by the Force.

    --
    I used to be a sceptic. These days, I'm not so certain.
  191. Re:I SAY this WITHOUT SHAME!-THANKS 4 LINK! by iamcf13 · · Score: 1

    That was entertaining to read.

    To date, I rank the 'Episodes' thus:

    Episode II - Dark, intricate, and action packed. Only bad(?) scene: the 'hearth' scene between Anakin and Amidala. I cringe just thinking about it. If Lucas goofed with the direction of that scene it shows! However, if he wanted to convey Anakin's awkwardness in a romantic situation, He and Hayden Christansen succeeded in spades!

    Episode V - Ditto. Basically tied with Ep II. Won't reveal the (in)famous plot twist here as it is nearly as old and legendary as John Williams' sharkmotif from JAWS (1975).

    Episode IV - Lucas (accidentally) redefines blockbuster and creates a memorable moviegoing experience--in spite of the minor intrinsic flaws in the original 1977 film. Yes, I know a major character did something important in the 1977 version that got revised 20 years later to the ire of 'madcore' SW fans everywhere, I'm just glad I finally got the 'Orignal Trilogy' on DVD allbeit their 1997 anniversary re-release versions. Fine, I suppose I could go out and get the bootleg DVD version sourced from the 1994 laserdisc versions of the original 1977/1980/1983 theatrical release of the 'Original Trilogy' if Lucasfilm hasn't shut down ALL (patently illegal) sources for this version....

    Episode VI - The 'worst' of the 'Original Trilogy' Unfortunately, Lucas 'sells out' to the 'Dark Side' of merchandising with the inclusion of the Ewoks. Strangely enough, this conscession for cash doesn't detract all that much from the overall entertainment value of this installment.

    Episode I - After a 16-year hiatus, STAR WARS is back on the big screen! Yawn.

    Maybe that bootleg Phantom Edit I've heard about has more juice than Lucas' full-length 'uncut' version.

    However, if the other four films in the saga that I have seen had not been made, it'd be rather entertaining up to a point in it's own right. Alas, this movie was only the $100+ million dollar keystone in the billion dollar deal Lucas struck with Pepsico for (some?/all?) the merchandising rights to the film. Anybody still remember 'Col. Sanders' waving a lightsaber about in the Pepsico TV ads for Episode I back in 1999? I still do somewhat.... :shiver:....

    Jar Jar Binks is only part of the problem of Episode I and not a fatal flaw of that film. I guess kids these days like pratfalls and scatalogical humor in the films they watch.... :p

    Currently waiting patiently to see Episode III on May 19th, 2005. Why couldn't it been the following Wednesday on the 25th? That way, the last(?) Episode could have premiered 'exactly' 28 years after the first one did....

    Maybe one day, Lucas will relent to fan pressure and make the 'Original Trilogy' finally and officially available in their original theatrical forms on DVD someday....

  192. Re:is a review going to stop anyone here from movi by AussieVamp2 · · Score: 0

    doubt it, if its crap, won't go

    becomes yet another possible $1 video rental, same as episode II

  193. Re:Tell you what I'm doing -- Netflix by ianscot · · Score: 1
    Never attribute to sneakiness that which can be adequately explained by the Force.

    Except he got caught in the most routine way possible -- so, you know, it can't be explained by the force, or by any of George Lucas's remarkably lame attempts to claim he's poaching on classical mythology, or anything really other than total lameness...

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  194. Re:Tell you what I'm doing -- Netflix by ianscot · · Score: 1
    a diversion to give yoda time to assemble the army...

    We both know why this makes absolutely no sense. It's not just the time involved... It Made No Sense.

    It made almost as much sense as how Dooku flew away at the end by... just flying away. Nice blockade, good thinking. Or as much sense as Anikin being a complete bonehead, to the point where he made my then-9-year-old kids laugh out loud, in The Big Light Saber Fight. That was so bad it was funny, and yet not bad enough to be really fun. Lame, lame, lame.

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  195. I saw Star Wars ROTS and it ROCKS by padmeamanda13 · · Score: 1

    Hundreds of Star Wars fans showed up last night at the Cinerama in downtown Seattle to watch the charity premiere of Star Wars: Episode 3: Return of the Sith... and I was among them! As a huge Star Wars fan, I have been looking forward to this movie for three years now, and it was amazing. This might just be the best Star Wars yet! The story contains every element that fans were expecting and hoping to see, and answers a lot of the questions we hoped to one day get answers for: Why do Obi-Wan and Yoda disappear when they die and why didn't Qui-Gon do the same? How does Anakin become Darth Vader? What happens to Padme? Why doesn't Anakin know Luke had a twin sister? Why did Luke and Leia grow up separately? Fans won't be disappointed with this movie. Jar-Jar is a non-mentioned background character you can ignore if you want and Artoo gets to be the comic hero instead (yay!). Also, the style of directing for the sad scenes could possibly be tear-jerkers to the more sensitive audience members, and it capture emotion better than when Anakin lost his mother in Episode 2. Hayden Christiansen's acting has improved, and though Natalie Portman's talent goes to waste in her role as Padme - a role in which her beauty is more important that her dialogue - she does a good job with what she's given and looks fabulous, as always. How many movies has Portman been pregnant in now? At least three... Anyway, my intention was not to spoil the movie and I hope I did not give anything away that you didn't already hear from the prequels and other interviews, but really, you won't be disappointed with this movie. Episode 1 and 2 were all exposition and character development... this is the REAL backstory to how Anakin Skywalker became Darth Vader. I'll predict one thing that will come out of this though... people will be spreading around a new catch-phrase: "Execute Order 66!" I wonder if someone has already made the T-shirt.

  196. Another one... by sleepingsquirrel · · Score: 1

    More bad news here.