Slashdot Mirror


Alternative-Fuel Vehicle Recommendations?

Ellen Spertus asks: "My husband and I lease a pure electric GM EV-1, which we love, and need to replace our second car, a conventional Honda Accord, which recently died. We'd get a second EV-1, but GM has stopped making them. I haven't been able to find any available all-eletric car with the range (>=50 miles roundtrip) and speed (>=65 mph) that I need. Does the Slashdot community have any experience, wisdom, or advice on choosing an alternative fuel car?"

"I'm currently considering:

We test drove a Toyota Prius today, and it seems like a nice car. It's said to provide a quieter and more comfortable ride than the Honda Insight, and it uses pure electric power at low speeds. The Honda Insight, on the other hand, has better gas mileage. I could refuel either at regular gas stations. The Honda Civic GX would need to be refueled at special stations, but there are many where I live and work, the San Francisco Bay Area. The GX is the lowest in emissions, which would qualify me to drive alone in the carpool lane. All of the cars are about the same price, around $20,000 new. Used cars are also available."

877 comments

  1. BIODIESEL by carlhirsch · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Biodiesel is one alternative energy means that I think has real potential. Apparently there's all sorts of new grants available for folks wanting to get involved.

    Just don't try to start that french fry grease up on a cold morning.

    --
    . We've got computers, we're tapping phone lines, you know that ain't allowed - Talking Heads, "Life During Wartime"
    1. Re:BIODIESEL by Eccles · · Score: 1

      Biodiesel [biodiesel.org] is one alternative energy means that I think has real potential.

      Isn't there a fundamental problem with biomass fuels, that it would require a large increase in the amount of farmed land? Our machines generally require rather more fuel than we do.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    2. Re:BIODIESEL by Steev · · Score: 2, Funny

      This actually isn't the case, because biodiesel can be made from waste products, such as the oil from a deep fryer. How many fast food joints are there in North America again? Exactly. Our own retarded lifestyle will keep us going :)

    3. Re:BIODIESEL by TheRedHorse · · Score: 3, Interesting

      To learn a little bit more about Biodiesel try HempCar.org, the hemp car (as the title may suggest) is a car developed to run on hemp as a Biodiesel. They are currently driving it across Canada. Sure, not a commercial solution and probably not legal in the US. but it gives you an example of one Biodiesel solution.

    4. Re:BIODIESEL by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Isn't there a fundamental problem with biomass fuels, that it would require a large increase in the amount of farmed land?
      Since we've got a lot of farmland right now that we're paying people not to farm...and since crops for biomass fuel are generally easier on the soil than food crops...and since a lot of what would otherwise be waste can be converted to biodiesel...I don't think that's a problem.
      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    5. Re:BIODIESEL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For all those Canadians living in Calgary Alberta, check out http://www.boiledfrog.org/.

      We make BioDiesel, and if you become a member of the Boiled Frog Trading Co-operative you can use our equipment to make your own too!

      I own a VW Golf along with my brother and a friend. We run it off BioDiesel, works great!

      BioDiesel is "carbon netrual" in the sense that the carbon the we're emmitting in our exhaust was sequestered from vegetables; so the carbon cycle is closed -- we're not adding carbon to the atmosphere. Fossil based diesel does, it digs up carbon from the earth.

    6. Re:BIODIESEL by MTO · · Score: 1

      check out the latest issue of Home Power Magazine. There is an article about biodiesel production. A Volkswagen TDI Golf and bio-diesel sounds like an excellent alternative fuel vehicle.

    7. Re:BIODIESEL by Eccles · · Score: 2, Informative

      How many fast food joints are there in North America again?

      There are ~30,000 McDonalds in the entire world, ~12,000 Burger Kings. There are a hell of a lot more cars than that.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    8. Re:BIODIESEL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I currently own a Golf TDI and run it on a 20% biodiesel blend. (Griffen Fuels BD, from recycled grease) Biodiesel is a pain in the @#$@# to get hold of, but if you can find a reliable source it is a great alternative. I wouldn't consider Biodiesel to be a "clean" fuel. It does significantly reduce the emissions of the diesel car, but nowhere near natural gas or even the hybrids. It's also a pain because you have to store it if there isn't a biodiesel station around.
      Having said that, I love the car. When chipped the TDI is faster than my VR6 GTI was in normal driving. It has enough torque that in a 50-70 rollon in 5th gear I can pull away from a BMW 330, but since this is a torque related thing, it definitely won't beat that same car from 0-60. It's quiet, and has tons of room. Also, you can run biodiesel or diesel interchangably depending on your mood. Plus, I average 40-45mpg in mixed driving.
      I do feel that, although it's a nice alternative now, it will lose out to other alternatives. I read one report that calculated the amount of recycling and crop production that would be required to provide existing levels of diesel replacement and the numbers were staggering. Land overuse became a practical reality.
      The TDI's represent an opportunity to be conservative, and encourage a recycled fuel resource, without sacrificing utility or comfort.

    9. Re:BIODIESEL by SWroclawski · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is unnecessary.

      Diesel vehicles will work with biodiesel "out of the box". In fact, biodiesel is the original fuel that diesel engines were designed to use, oil-based fuels came after the engine and refining techniques were used to make it simulate the naturally occuring oils.

      Also, biodiesel is less harsh than oil-based diesel, helping the car last longer.

      As to the smell- while biodiesel does have an odor, so does petrol.

      - Serge Wroclawski

    10. Re:BIODIESEL by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 2

      Ehh, I'm sure the Taco Bell's, Pizza Huts, A&W's, Arby's, KFCs, and Foster's Freezes can pitch in as well.

      --
      "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    11. Re:BIODIESEL by otis+wildflower · · Score: 2, Informative

      Correction: Most diesel vehicles will run fine on B20, but B100 (pure) will damage rubber hoses and gaskets. Cars with those (like mine) will need upgrades to accomodate B100.

    12. Re:BIODIESEL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People are starting to produce the oils reqired for biodiesel using "farms" of genetically engineered algae. If one fith of the USA's unused farmland were converted to algae farms we could supply the USA with enough fuel to keep it going.

    13. Re:Biodiesel by M-G · · Score: 2

      Good points, but a couple of comments:

      It's expensive (~$3/gal) but it may be worth it to you if you want to contribute to (a)saving the
      ozone layer and/or (b)keeping US$ out of the hands of despotic Arab states (and their terrorist pawns)..


      The ozone layer has nothing to do with what fuel you're burning. Destruction of upper level ozone is from CFCs, not tailpipe emissions.

      The US still produces huge quantities of oil, and most of our imports come from Canada, Mexico, and Venezuela.

      Oh, did I mention that biodiesel can be made from any biological substance that contains triglycerides?

      Excellent! So we just need a blood filtering system to convert those high triglyceride levels into biodiesel!

    14. Re:BIODIESEL by rhost89 · · Score: 1

      Dont forget about Sonics, In and Outs, Braums, Hardes/Carl's Jr, white castle, and the host of others that arnt on the west coast.

      --
      I will bend your mind with my spoon
    15. Re:Biodiesel by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      "What to do with the glycerin though, that's the main Q"

      Simple, process the glycerin and the Nitrous Oxide somehow into Nitroglycerin (an excercise best left to someone who knows what he's talking about, that ain't me).

      Then use the Nitroglycerin as a propellant in the manner of the hypothetical Atomic Drive models that relied on ejecting a bomb behind the (in this case spacecraft) where it would detonate, and the explosion would push against a specially shaped shield and push the vehicle forward.

      This would also tend to deter tail-gaters...

      Hey I learned all my physics from cartoons.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    16. Re:BIODIESEL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nitpick, Taco Bell and Pizza Hut have very little deep frying.
      Can't think of any off-hand at Taco Bell.
      Anyway, point is that we use our car far more than we eat at fast food joints. Unless you're able to match your car gulp for gulp...

      Biodiesel will help, but it isn't a solution.

    17. Re:Biodiesel by eMilkshake · · Score: 1
      Use glycerin to make explosives, silly!

      Save the environment--then blow it up!

    18. Re:BIODIESEL by Nanuq · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the teenagers working at the aforementioned restaurants.

      Their faces will get you places.

    19. Re:BIODIESEL by jkonrath · · Score: 1

      >> nitpick, Taco Bell and Pizza Hut have very little deep frying. Can't think of any off-hand at Taco Bell.

      All of the hard shells and chips at Taco Bell are fried in oil at each restaurant. Same with tortillas, salad bowls, etc. They do it in the morning before the store opens. At least they did for the few months I worked there in... well, a while ago.

      -Jon

    20. Re:BIODIESEL by remoford · · Score: 1

      Waffle House must produce at least 10x what McDonalds does, but I hear they dont have them on the west coast. To bad for yall :(

    21. Re:Biodiesel by DragonSilk · · Score: 1

      Make Soap!! Glycerin is wonderful for making soap!!!

    22. Re:Biodiesel by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      The ozone layer has nothing to do with what fuel you're burning. Destruction of upper level ozone is from CFCs, not tailpipe emissions.


      Ack! Close enough for art ;)

      Excellent! So we just need a blood filtering system to convert those high triglyceride levels into biodiesel!

      I was thinking more like liposuction, but yeah, I guess so..

      (Or a Soylent-style process: drop Al Qaeda bodies in one end, and fill up at the other)

      Hehe

    23. Re:BIODIESEL by pschmitt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      With all these discussions of biodiesel and ethanol, my question is this. Do we really need the plants? I mean what we have here is plants that are taking CO2, H2O, and energy from the sun to make hydrocarbon molecules. I'm no expert at organic chemistry, but can't we make our hydrocarbons through various chemical reactions. And if I'm not mistaken, we can just make good old gasoline for which the vast majority of cars are already designed. The CO2 is in the air everywhere. H2O is widely available. And aren't there times and places where energy is relatively cheap. For example, at 3 in the morning when energy use on the electric grids are very low, aren't there nuclear power plants, or hydroelectric dams that have spare capacity that just goes to waste? Or what about that recent article about Iceland having so much cheap energy that they want to use it to produce hydrogen. The only problem is that then they are going to have to convert so many different systems to user hydrogen. Why don't they just produce good old gasoline? I'd love to see the comments of anyone who is familiar with the economics of using organic chemistry to produce gasoline.

    24. Re:BIODIESEL by ksheff · · Score: 1

      Yes, it will expand the market for those commodities, but it's not like they can only be used for biodiesel or livestock feed (probably the biggest use). What's left from from the oil extraction process can still be used for feed. Like others have said, would you rather have a farm market with sustainable prices or one where subsidies are required?

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    25. Re:BIODIESEL by speederaser · · Score: 1

      The problem with a chemical factory turning sunlight and atmospheric CO2 into hydrocarbons is the sunlight-to-electricity conversion. Current solar panels are around 10% to 15% efficient, and then you still have to convert the electricity to hydrocarbons.

      Plants, on the other hand, are 85% to 90% efficient at turning sunlight directly into hydrocarbons. Compared to a factory, plants are more than an order of magnitude more efficient. Human engineering has a long way to go to catch up with hundreds of millions of years of evolution.

    26. Re:BIODIESEL by sopwath · · Score: 0, Troll

      See the above post. Find some info on what ethanol did to engines when it was first put into gasoline.

      There's also a pretty dramatic drop in engine performance. In fact the drop is more than enough to make BioDiesel less environmentally friendly than using regular petroleum based norm.

    27. Re:Biodiesel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NOx could be handled with catalytic converters.

      Are you sure about this? I am under the impression that to reduce NOx compounds you need much higher exhaust gas temperatures than is present in a diesel. This is why a typical wankel rotary has such low NOx emissions: their EGTs are extremely high compared to piston engines.

    28. Re:BIODIESEL by SWroclawski · · Score: 1

      You clearly don't know what biodiesel is and how it's different than ethanol.

      - Serge Wroclawski

    29. Re:Biodiesel by drinkypoo · · Score: 2
      What to do with the glycerin though, that's the main Q...

      Stick it in dietary supplements, I hear sugar alcohols don't count :D

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    30. Re:Biodiesel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hybrids really don't count IMHO as 'alternative fuel' vehicles, since they use two fuels that are exceedingly ordinary: gasoline and electricity.

      Good point, except that electricity isn't a fuel.

    31. Re:BIODIESEL by scaryman · · Score: 0

      also in europe (i'm not sure about the farmering policies in the US) a lot of land is used to grow rapeseed, must of which is payed for with farm subsidies, and just destroyed.

      there are a few good sites on converting diesel engines to run on vegatable oil
      http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8& oe =UTF-8&q=uk+vegetable+oil++diesel+&spell=1

      the following is a large report on bio-fuels
      http://216.239.39.100/search?q=cache:kc -5RYs6j_MC: www.eurofound.ie/publications/files/EF0048EN.pdf+u k+rapeseed+diesel+experiment+reading+berkshire&hl= en&ie=UTF-8

    32. re: BIODIESEL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the hempcar is an unmodified Benz 300 TD station wagon. Last year it traveled 13,000 miles on hemp biodiesel at an avg fuel consumption of 27 MPG.

  2. Have you considered?... by redfieldp · · Score: 5, Informative

    The The Honda Civic Hybrid ? It uses gas and electric, and gets pretty sweet mileage, plus its battery is self charging....

    1. Re:Have you considered?... by Rackemup · · Score: 2
      Yeah I'd go with the Honda Civic hybrid over the Honda Insight.

      The new Civic has the second generation electric assist engine as an option... The insight was first generation.

    2. Re:Have you considered?... by sakyamuni · · Score: 1

      We took a Honda Civic Hybrid (new for 2003) on a test drive recently and was impressed. Of course the nifty instrument panel that shows real-time miles-per-gallon, battery charge power, etc. appeals to the geek in me. Otherwise it's hard to tell it apart from the non-hybrid Civic.

      We were surprised to see that the Hybrid gets a higher gas mileage in the city than on the highway (according to EPA figures). This is apparently due to the innovative optional (i.e. you can turn it off) feature that shuts down the gasoline engine while stopped at a light. That was a bit disconcerting at first, but worked surprisingly well.

      My next car is definitely going to be one of these babies!

    3. Re:Have you considered?... by sckeener · · Score: 2

      I love my Honda Hybrid. I got it with the cvt instead of the manual, but I'm still getting 44mpg.

      I recently went from Friendswood (south Houston) to Wichita Falls Texas (415 miles) and still had a fifth of the gas tank left.

      I have had zero problems with the car.

      --
      "Only one thing, is impossible for god: to find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." Mark Twain
    4. Re:Have you considered?... by M-G · · Score: 2

      And the Insight has a teeny track, so you're always hitting ruts in the road, Honda specifies zero toe on the front wheels, so you'll change directions if a mouse sneezes in your direction, etc. For practical uses, the Civic hybrid is much better than the Insight.

    5. Re:Have you considered?... by buck-yar · · Score: 1

      I am not impressed. I get 38/30 mpg in my '91 camry. 11 Years and 130,000 miles older, not even mentioning my car was totaled and rebuilt (not the engine)... Yet you only get 6 mpg better than me? I have to add a quart of oil every tank of gas. My car weighs a lot, handles poor, and I drive it hard... Yet you only get 6pmg better than me?

      I say my car is 11 years old, but the design was actually engineered in the mid 80's. Yet you only get 6mpg better than me.

      If this is the case with hybrids then they are doomed. Nobody wants an underperforming car that gets slightly better fuel economy.

      I have to ask, why look into alternative fuel solutions? Our economy has engineered itself around gasoline, and has done a pretty good job doing it. We have finely tuned gasoline engines, excellent ways of getting the gas to the consumer, and ingenius ways of getting the oil needed to refine. The free market is our best tool for advancement of transportation.

      If there was a better way of doing what we're doing... we'd be doing it. Once technology advances to a state that alternative fuel sources become cost effective for both the consumer and in sales, we will see them.

      Never underestimate the power of the free market.

    6. Re:Have you considered?... by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      Is it worth it though? I mean you can get a sedan from nissan, honda, mitsubishi or toyota for cheaper. Say you really could find a Honda for 20,000 - I could find a decent sentra starting at 11,000-12000 - 8000-9000 dollar difference and you can spend the rest on gas :).

      My 95 Nissan Sentra - almost 130,000 miles old still gets 35 mpg in the city and 45-50 mpg on the highway (and no I'm not kidding in the slightest)

    7. Re:Have you considered?... by Zathrus · · Score: 2

      I have to ask, why look into alternative fuel solutions

      Are you serious? Or merely trolling?

      There are both ecological and geopolitical reasons to look into alternative fuel vehicles. Even if you don't buy into global warming (I'm reasonably neutral on it), it's indisputable that gasoline engines generate a good bit of pollution that isn't good for anyone. And there are some pretty damn good economic and political reasons to reduce dependance on Middle Eastern oil exports -- while the majority of US foreign oil does not come from this area, enough of it does that OPEC significantly affects both our economy and our foreign policy. And a rather good percentage of the member states deeply dislike the Western world.

      Of course, there's the whole issue of petroleum being a non-renewable resource. It will run out eventually. When? Hell if I know. Hell if anyone knows. Back in the 70s it was supposed to run out in 20 years. More oil fields were discovered, better extraction and refining equipment was developed, and now it looks like at least another 50 years are in the ground.

      Never underestimate the power of the free market.

      Never forget that the invisible hand does not weigh all costs. Pollution and other long term effects are not adequately compensated for in the free market -- by the time they become problematic the groups that have profited will not be affected by the costs thereof.

      Besides which, this IS the free market doing its job -- attempting to find alternatives to the older, increasingly expensive system.

      If you were charged for the massive amount of pollution your car is belching out (1 quart of oil/tank? That's an issue) then maybe you'd realize all the hidden costs too.

    8. Re:Have you considered?... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Curious about the zero toe thing. Are manufacturers resorting to this now as a way to increase MPG? Isn't that basically producing a car that is more difficult to drive just so they can score a few more MPG points?

    9. Re:Have you considered?... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well said. Burning oil == bad. I'd also be surprised if that fellow's car could do so well on a *standardized* test like they rate economy with.

    10. Re:Have you considered?... by JoeHep · · Score: 1

      I own one the of the Honda Civic Hybirds and think it is outclasses the Toyota car by a long shot. I drive 80 miles one-way to work each day over some very hilly county (one hill is a 5% grade for 2 miles) and it gets about 41-42 MPG. The VW TDI is advertised with better milage, and if you can get those numbers in real life it would be a better choice. I test drove one for about 75 miles one day and it had a kick, but I did see the fuel guage drop... I drove a motorcycle for 2 years in college and other than people not knowing you are there - even when you are right in front of them - they are great. So if you're ready to put your life in someone else's hands everytime you get on the road, go for it. I did a little research on bio-diesel and it sounds great. You can burn it in a regular diesel car with only minor modifications, but where are you going to buy it? I hope this helps. The best I can say is that I cannot reccomend the Honda Civic Hybird enough

      --
      When the only tool you have is an ax, every problem looks fun.
    11. Re:Have you considered?... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The VW TDI is advertised with better milage, and if you can get those numbers in real life it would be a better choice"

      My 2002 New Beetle TDI is getting 51mpg. I drive 46 miles each way to work, about 75% freeway 25% city.

      "I drove a motorcycle for 2 years in college and other than people not knowing you are there - even when you are right in front of them - they are great. So if you're ready to put your life in someone else's hands everytime you get on the road, go for it"

      Now that I have the TDI, my motorcycle (at 38Mpg) seems like a gas hog... And you put your life in someone else's hands every time you are in a car on any road. Life = risk.

      "I did a little research on bio-diesel and it sounds great. You can burn it in a regular diesel car with only minor modifications, but where are you going to buy it?"

      Bio-Diesel will burn in any Diesel engine made after about 1995 with no modifications. It will run in any VW TDI made with no modifications. (The issue is Biodiesel will eat through some rubber seals, but those seals are not used any more).
      I cannot buy it locally, even though we have a plant that makes it near our home. But I have bought some in Seattle, and soon they will have retail in Oregon as well. California has a lot of retail Biodiesel spots.
      And as long as you use at least 20% biodiesel, you qualify as an alternative fuel vehicle.

    12. Re:Have you considered?... by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

      I was curious if anyone knows (I live in Arizona and as such this is very important) about the Air-conditioning in the hybrids?

      These Hybrid cars turn off the engine when stopped, and start out on batteries. Does it run the engine the entire time if you have the A/C on? or is that ran off of electric completly?

      (I am not personally as curious about heat, but again is that a electric heater?)

    13. Re:Have you considered?... by wilson_c · · Score: 1

      I'm completely underwhelmed by the Honda Hybrid. If the '93 Civic Vtec could get 55mpg, then why does 9 years of additional technology and a relatively inexpensive car like the hybrid get worse milage? A bad hybrid like this is a worse choice, fuel-economy-wise, than a good fuel engine like some of the very efficient Volkswagens.

    14. Re:Have you considered?... by ostrich2 · · Score: 1
      If there was a better way of doing what we're doing... we'd be doing it

      In that case, I'll power my car with FUSION POWER! It's clearly the better way to do it. It's very eco-friendly, too.

    15. Re:Have you considered?... by kleinux · · Score: 1

      I think this is a better bet. She will only get a few miles on a charge, but she sure is fast. http://www.bgsu.edu/colleges/technology/EVI

  3. The technology's a little old... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...but what about the Flintstones car? Methane emissions were low and it ran on calories. =)

    1. Re:The technology's a little old... by grossinm · · Score: 2, Funny

      I doubt Fred was low on methane...

    2. Re:The technology's a little old... by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately, the airbag would have to be manually inflated. Unless you're giving Monica Lewinski a ride, it has no chance of inflating at time.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:The technology's a little old... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      Unfortunately, the airbag would have to be manually inflated. Unless you're giving Monica Lewinski a ride, it has no chance of inflating at time.
      So that's what really happenned in Ted Kennedy's car at Chappaquiddick: the airbag didn't get blown in time...
    4. Re:The technology's a little old... by ichimunki · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You know what stinks? This joke is the only post in the whole discussion that actually tries to get serious about what it means to be "alternative fuel"-- oddly by suggesting one of the oldest fuels known to humankind.

      You want low emissions and breathable air? Stop driving so damn much in the first plce. In fact, stop driving altogether if you can-- at the very least share cars more often... that the original questioner here is looking to buy a SECOND vehicle is a big red flag that someone has lifestyle issues that aren't going to be solved by simply saving a few miles per gallon.

      Most of the driving done by Americans is done in the name of personal convenience: to save a few minutes of having to sit next to your fellow human being on the bus or train or to prevent you from having to walk or bike a few feet.

      As I see it, the environmental, social, and psychic impacts of car culture go way beyond just the emissions questions. Personally I'm finding that the less time I spend in cars, the more time I have to read (on the bus), the more time I spend seeing neighbors (on the bus or while riding my bike). Not only that, I feel healthier than I have in a few years, since getting some exercise is no longer optional.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    5. Re:The technology's a little old... by mother_superius · · Score: 1

      It's called a bicycle!

      I tell frat boys that they can run on beer when they yell at me.

    6. Re:The technology's a little old... by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this works great if you live in a rathole like L.A. or New York. I live 60 miles from work & commute in everyday. I do this so I can live out in the county on 10 acres, and not have to deal with my fellow humans, because most of them suck.

      Don't get me wrong, I drive a 4cyl, and do what I can for the environment, but I'm not about to give up my peace & quiet (and the ability to walk outside naked whenever I feel like it) so I can live in a large city with public transportation & deal with the idiots also residing there.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    7. Re:The technology's a little old... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this works fine if you're a city person. Once I get to a city, public transportation doubles my transportation time at a minimum. Public transportation is also a great disease vector. When I took public transportation on a regular basis, I had far more colds and flues than I did when driving.

      So, I will stick to the car in the country thank you very much.

    8. Re:The technology's a little old... by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

      You come live here a while (San Fernando Valley, on Los Angeles' north side) and then decide whether cars are needed.

      Until then, take your rethoric elsewhere.

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    9. Re:The technology's a little old... by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      I'd normally dismiss this post as 'trolling' or flamebait, but sadly I think you believe what you're saying.

      Let me explain something to you: Remember back in the late 70's when there was that gas shortage? That didn't result in a generation of 'pedestrians'. It's not because Americans love their cars too much, it's because believe it or not, we are dependent on them.

      I think you'd be surprised at how many people go about their business on foot. I know you have this image in your head that people drive everywhere they can, but I really think your attitude would change if you were to visit Portland, Oregon. Nearly everybody I know in Portland walks where they can or has moved close to where they work, yet we still have a high volume of traffic. The simple fact of the matter is that places are too far away.

      It's easy to say 'drive less'. However, you have to consider that in high traffic areas (or, in other words, the most polluted areas...) its not pleasant to drive. Nobody wants to be stuck in traffic. Nobody wants to drive bumper to bumper. And nobody wants to deal with stoplights. (as a matter of fact, Portlanders are taking the attitude that Stoplights are merely suggested driving.)

      Trust me when I say that if we could get out of driving everywhere, most of us would. I know LOTS of people that were pissed about Webvan falling.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    10. Re:The technology's a little old... by AltaMannen · · Score: 1

      I live in L.A. and I don't drive. I walk or bicycle. Sometimes I go with other people in cars when we need to get somewhere. And there are plenty of buses to take people from any point in L.A. to any other point in L.A. People who live here drive far too much and they whine all day how they depend on their cars.

      Losers.

      Yes, I'll move away soon and stop bothering you.

    11. Re:The technology's a little old... by mikecarrmikecarr · · Score: 1

      ...but what about the Flintstones car? Methane emissions were low and it ran on calories. =)

      FWIW, you can measure gasoline, ethanol, whatever in terms of calorie consumption as well. IIRC, a calorie is just a unit of heat.

      And don't tell me that Fred didn't generate his share of methane after eating those bronto burgers! :)

      --

      ID-10-T is a way of life

    12. Re:The technology's a little old... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you're right. I'm aware of that. I think it is something along the lines of 'how much energy it takes to heat up a unit of water.'. With all the stories about how obese Americans are, I kinda thought it was appropriate heh.

      I did read somewhere that humans are far more energy efficient than cars. Something equivalent to 300 mpg. I wish I could tell you if that accounted for speed or weight, or if they meant that a gallon of gas would have enough calories for a human to walk 300 miles.

      It does take roughly 10 miles of walking to burn off a pound. (or something like that.) In all seriousness, a 'twinkie powered car' would be interesting indeed. Heh. :)

    13. Re:The technology's a little old... by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

      that's sweet...

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    14. Re:The technology's a little old... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about a car fueled by the screams of little children?

    15. Re:The technology's a little old... by penguinboy · · Score: 2

      Walking or using public transportation is all well and good if it's a viable alternative in your situation, but for plenty of people it is not. Take my school for example. While some of the students are local, many live up to 30 miles away. Driving is the only way to get there, as public transportation is just too spotty (very few train stops, trains do not come very often).

      I like to go to Boston (~35 miles) now and then and I can only take public transportation about half way. There is a subway that covers the second half of the trip, but train service between my home and there is only about once per hour and doesn't run all day long. I don't have anything against public transportation, but it just isn't practical in some cases.

      I think public transportation in the US suffers from something of a chicken and egg problem. It works in large cities, but much of the country is suburban or rural. People in those areas can't use public transportation very much because there is typically much less service than in major cities, and their cars work just fine to get them where they want to go. But public transportation can't get the funding to build up infrastructure if enough people aren't already using it. Thus it will probably take a major crisis with conventional transportation (running out of petroleum, say) to actually effect the transition to public transportation.

    16. Re:The technology's a little old... by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      Why should I come live there? I already live out my rhetoric in one of the US' larger metro areas-- one that leads the nation in car ownership per capita at that. If you are going to call my gentle urgings "rhetoric", I'd say the real problem is not where you live, but your unwillingness to take alternatives seriously by passing the buck to a mindset of "this is the way it is where I live". What? You have no control over where you live? You have no ability to at least be thoughtful in your car ownership and usage habits? Sounds like the sort of excuse-laden rhetoric SUV drivers usually rely on to justify their over-sized vehicles.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    17. Re:The technology's a little old... by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      Is it just me or are you being overly defensive? I don't really think it makes sense to spend one or two hours stuck in a little car just to live out in the country... but that's just my opinion. That's a big chunk of your day. Every day. Just to get into a city filled with all those darn idiots. Yeah, you get the whole weekend in a very nice setting, so maybe it's a good deal. Especially if you lean to the antisocial, as you seem to.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    18. Re:The technology's a little old... by ichimunki · · Score: 1
      Thank you for the benefit of the doubt! I certainly believe what I'm saying because I, and many of my friends have lived significant portions, if not all, of our adult lives without the benefit of a privately owned automobile.

      American dependency on cars is not the problem-- the roads are a wonderful tool and an important piece of our infrastructure. The problem is that it's a vicious cycle. The more you set things up to be car-friendly, the more they tend to be friendly to anything but cars. And the more everyone spends making sure they have their own private vehicle, the less likely we are to explore other options.

      Oddly, for how much you say people don't want to drive, they still are driving. If they truly worked on alternatives, there would be no bumper to bumper traffic. For my part, I'm glad my city has a decent bus system (and is working on a light rail system). This means that even if it's crowded I can usually sit down and read a book, instead of worrying that some impatient yoyo on a cell phone is going to rear-end me or whatever.

      At the same time as I want to encourage others to look at alternatives, I'm suggesting them because of experiences I've had myself. I own a car right now. I found that as soon as I got it I used it consistently for trips that would have been inconvenient, but still possible, on the bus or by bike, or even by walking. Maybe everyone else is better than I am at this, I don't know. More power to them if they are able to own cars and still manage to make ecologically sound choices in the face of overwhelming convenience.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    19. Re:The technology's a little old... by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      The problem is that the USA is HUGE. If people cut out recreational driving all together, we'd still have emissions problems and we'd still be vulnerable to economic problems caused by ridiculously high demand for oil.

      That's why you're recieving negative responses here. The 'cut your driving' solution won't do much, if any good. (The gas shortage in the 70's showed us that) What they need to do is come up with a more fuel efficient car. That's really the only practical solution.

      We're willing to put our money behind that.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    20. Re:The technology's a little old... by ichimunki · · Score: 1
      But oddly enough, the more fuel efficient cars become, the more people seem to be buying bigger, bulkier cars that are not fuel-efficient-- even newer midsized sedans really aren't that much more fuel efficient today than they were several years ago. I would probably have less complaint if more people drove cars like the ones discussed in this thread. I think this is a great trend. But every morning as I wait for the bus I watch traffic... and in my neighborhood it would seem that at least 25% of the traffic are vehicles like pickups, SUVs, jeeps, other large, inefficient vehicles, about 80% of which are carrying a single occupant.

      My "cut your driving" solution will do plenty of good. If people actually cut their driving by doing things like car sharing, car pooling, biking, careful trip planning, etc. But they seem reluctant to do much of this because every day that passes makes non-car solutions actually less convenient. So the trade-off is increasing convenience from car usage for less and less convenience from other methods.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    21. Re:The technology's a little old... by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "even newer midsized sedans really aren't that much more fuel efficient today than they were several years ago..." -- There is only so much energy petroleum can put out. I think we're close to it's limit really.

      "and in my neighborhood it would seem that at least 25% of the traffic are vehicles like pickups, SUVs, jeeps, other large, inefficient vehicles, about 80% of which are carrying a single occupant."

      This really isn't indicative of anything. Pickups aren't about passengers, they're about cargo. SUVs, well frankly I don't have a high opinion of them and won't defend them. I know one (1) guy that has an SUV that I approve of him having. He only drives it when he needs it. As a matter of fact, he helped me move with it heh.

      Here's the thing, SUV's get like half the mileage of a mid-sized sedan. SUV's are popular, but at most I'd estimate that they account for no more than 25% of traffic on the road. If you cut them out completely and replaced them with sedans, the amount of emmissions wouldn't go down more than a few percent.

      You're forgetting that there are lots of vehicles all over the country that NEED to run. Semis, Ambulances, Airplanes, etc. Lots of stuff that is related to public service or for shipping stuff like food and medical supplies.

      Could people be more fuel effective? I think that'll always be true. The true solution is something like hydrogen based fuel-cell technology. Think about it, when that's done, your only concern will be how much money you spend. Emissions aren't a worry anymore at that point.

      Personally, I think the oil will run out before we destroy the environment with it. Heh.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    22. Re:The technology's a little old... by ichimunki · · Score: 1
      If we assume a constant rate of emissions per gallon of fuel burned, we can show mathematically that emissions will be reduced if we cut the number of large vehicles in half (X is number of vehicles). .25(1/15)X + .75(1/30)X = total emissions. If you keep X constant, you will see that as we alter the .25 and the .75 (keeping the sum equal to 1-- these are the percentage cars in ech class, SUVs and sedans respectively) that total emissions goes down as the .75 gets closer to 1.

      Using the formula I've shown here, a 5% switch from SUVs (at 15 mpg) to compacts (at 30 mpg), nets a 4% decrease in emissions. Cutting the number of SUVs in half results in a 10% decrease in emissions. A good deal, if you ask me. Cut them out entirely and emissions go down 20%.

      I am not forgetting that there are lots of large vehicles needed... it's not like I've proposed to tear up existing freeways without a second thought. Most of the large vehicles I see are single occupant and do not appear to be engaged in hauling anything other than the hindquarters of a blonde on a cell phone. Of course there are many legitimate uses for large vehicles... but private ownership is almost always overkill unless one is occupationally likely to be hauling large loads frequently. Don't forget that there are many hatchback/station wagon models of much more efficient vehicles that are often a viable alternative to vehicles like the Suburban or the Ford Explorer monstrosities.

      Unfortunately I don't have the resources/information at the ready to estimate what the real ratio of cars to large vehicles is, and how many of the large vehicles can realistically be replaced with smaller vehicles. The main thing we need to work on is having an overall decrease in the number of vehicles by doing things like carpooling. Every time someone gives me a ride, instead of both of us driving emissions go down by 50%. That's my point.

      One can only hope you're right that we'll run out of oil before destroying the environment... in the meantime I can still enjoy the health and mental health benefits of a non-automotive lifestyle. To me, it is a distinctly personal decision, not done so much (at this point) out of a self-righteous need to save the world, but simply done to save myself.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    23. Re:The technology's a little old... by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      I see what you're saying, but the difference between 10% and 50% is a lot. I think we could easily reduce emissions by 50% if newer technologies were adopted. The plus is we wouldn't need to change our driving habits.

      You seem to think that people can cut out driving. What I'm saying is that's not really true. Are there people that could make more economical choices (like not using an SUV when they dont need to?) yep. Not arguing that. But I don't think even a 10% drop in emissions would happen in that case.

      (I doubt we'll agree with each other, wanna just agree to disagree? I'm not trying to fight with ya or anything.)

      I think what'll kick people in the seat of the pants is a sharp increase in oil prices. I bought a new car a couple of weeks ago. (Honda Civic, gets about 35 mpg) I thought seriously hard about getting a hybrid that gets better mileage, but it drove up the price roughly $5,000. I didn't see myself saving that much money. The truth is I'm mostly a pedestrian (I moved to where I could walk to work) so it's not that big of deal.

      I did the math and figured that gas would have to increase about 3x before a hybrid became worth the extra money. I have a 5 year loan on the car, I'm not sure that gas will go up 3x in that time. If it does, then I'll just have to eat it for a while.

      But.. you know, there's murmurs that USA's going to invade Iraq. I personally hope it doesn't, but if it does it'll probably play hell with gas prices. If it does, we may see a lot of people take the initiative and get more efficient cars. But what I don't see happening is a drastic reduction in emissions over it.

      I am curious if anybody correlated the data of gas emission with the gas shortage in the late 70's. I have a feeling that'll tell us that the difference wasn't that significant.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    24. Re:The technology's a little old... by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

      I used to live in France, took the subway, train, RER, bus, etc. It was cost and time effective then. In Los Angeles, riding public transportation is more expensive than car ownership (less govt subsidies of service, lower fuel cost for vehicles) and more time consuming (I have to go downtown to go to Santa Monica from where I am--a 20 miles detour)

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    25. Re:The technology's a little old... by ichimunki · · Score: 1
      (I doubt we'll agree with each other, wanna just agree to disagree? I'm not trying to fight with ya or anything.)

      OK. I don't think we're that far off from each other anyway. You obviously take this issue seriously enough to have moved to be able to walk to work and let it steer your purchasing decisions. If more people made the choices you've made, I'd have almost nothing left to complain about. :)

      --
      I do not have a signature
    26. Re:The technology's a little old... by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      Yeah I think you're right.. :)

      Funny thing is I didn't move out of concern for the environment, I moved because parking here is too expensive heh. However, I made a health choice to walk more, so it's a plus for everybody.

      Good day, man. :)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  4. You're definitely making the best choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hybrids are more eco-friendly than pure electric cars in most regions of the country. Where does all that electricity come from, after all? A wall socket? No, a coal-burning plant. Ditch your coal-burning vehicle for an eco-friendly Honda Insight.

    1. Re:You're definitely making the best choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about you, but I think trolls should be either on topic or off-topic. Either respond to the message you're replying to or talk about hot grits. Instead, you're talking about Hondas (so you've at least read the Slashdot topic) but have clearly not even read the post you're responding to.

      Personally, I see no point in dragging poor Natalie Portman into all this.

  5. Convert a car by shepd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Many cars can be converted to run on Natural Gas. Ask someone locally with a car that runs on it where they got theirs done.

    Just note that you'll probably lose a lot of trunk space unless you want to risk running out of Natural Gas between trips.

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    1. Re:Convert a car by Turing+Machine · · Score: 1

      I think you mean propane, don't you?

      Natural gas (methane, mostly) is very hard to store.

    2. Re:Convert a car by jchristopher · · Score: 1
      Many cars can be converted to run on Natural Gas. Ask someone locally with a car that runs on it where they got theirs done.

      Before anyone gets any ideas, please not that this is no longer possible in California due to Air Quality regulations.

    3. Re:Convert a car by shepd · · Score: 1

      While they do make propane conversions (I think) I know they have natural gas conversions as well.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    4. Re:Convert a car by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Before anyone gets any ideas, please not that this is no longer possible in California due to Air Quality regulations.

      I don't know when that law came into effect, but I do know this site (that I mentioned in another message) mentions a list of Californian conversion centers.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    5. Re:Convert a car by jchristopher · · Score: 1
      I think that you'll find that the conversion centers listed are really for large industrial equipment rather than passenger cars. For example, the NGV Ecotrans facility listed handled converting a huge truck platform to CNG for use as the foundation of a float in the Rose Parade. Other conversion shops do things like add CNG to forklifts and other indoor (not street legal) equipment.

      This is not to say that it's impossible. I don't know that there is a LAW that makes it illegal to convert your own vehicle... it may just be that it's impossible to get the resulting car to pass smog which is necessary in order to register it. California state law specifies that in order to pass smog a vehicle must have all it's original emissions control equipment, as well as a lot of other requirements, maybe that's the problem.

    6. Re:Convert a car by Turing+Machine · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link.

      They definitely make propane conversions also.

      It must be a real bear to carry enough natural gas around to be worthwhile (hence your trunk comment). The advantage of propane is that it's a liquid at room temperature, if it's compressed. Methane needs cryogenic temperatures to become liquid at any sane pressure.

    7. Re:Convert a car by crackbeer · · Score: 1

      Natural gas (methane, mostly) is very hard to store.

      That still no excuse for farting in church.

    8. Re:Convert a car by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      Propane isn't used so much for street cars. A lot of forklifts use it though, since they're often driven indoors in warehouses.

    9. Re:Convert a car by shepd · · Score: 1

      >It must be a real bear to carry enough natural gas around to be worthwhile (hence your trunk comment).

      I'm not sure since I don't actually have a converted car myself. I just know a lot of people who've had their vans and cars converted since Natural Gas and Propane are about 1/2 the price of Gasoline (or were at the time they got their vehicles converted).

      However, I noticed the trunk thing and asked once about it. Basically, it was either get it in the trunk or replace their gas tank with a Natural Gas cylinder. The benefits of being able to use both fuels on one car outweigh the trunk space, I suppose (there's not too many gas stations selling Natural Gas, I'm afraid, so if you're planning to make a long trip, you'll need to switch to regular Gasoline at some point unless you're lucky). Yes, all the vehicles I've seen with NG/Propane had a switch between that and gasoline. :-)

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  6. I too want a CNG car, but almost no CNG stations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would buy a CNG car tomorrow. But I live in NYC and pretty much all the CNG stations are owned by Brooklyn Union Gas and they do not resell to individuals.

    I would go with the Toyota.. I see many of them in NYC being used by the NYC MTA and other utilities

  7. Honda Insight by EverlastingPhelps · · Score: 1

    My business partner bought a Honda Insight a couple of years ago, so I am fairly familiar with his experiences. He enjoy driving it; he says that it takes some practice to learn the light touch you need to get it from 50 mpg to the mid 60s, but not hard.

    The car routinely gets heads to turn, and he says that the resale value is high enough that even with only 2 years paid on the car he has equity (rather than being upside down.) I have no first-hand knowledge of the other vehicles.

    1. Re:Honda Insight by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      On a side note, you can have equity with any car, if you go with a shorter loan. Its rare for any car to not be upside down in an 60 month loan. Look at the length of the loan, not just the payment when you buy your next car. Being upside down sucks big time if you total the car.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    2. Re:Honda Insight by PapaSmurph · · Score: 1

      I have to say, I really enjoy my Insight. I've had it for 4 months now and love to drive it to work. I average about 62MPG, but have gotten up to 75MPG on long trips. And don't let the size fool you. You can cram lots of stuff into it. If you don't need more than 2 seats, go with the Insight. And BTW, depending on the state you live in, you may be able to take any of these cars in the HOV lanes. Virginia allows any hybrid car in HOV, as well as CNG.

    3. Re:Honda Insight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the heads turn as people say, "Hey, look at that fag driving the gay ass Honda! Let's go beat the fuck out of him".

    4. Re:Honda Insight by rapidweather · · Score: 1
      I believe an article in the Wall Street Journal told of folks that can get over 100 mpg out of a Honda Insight, with careful driving. One trick, driving barefoot, to be able to feel gas pedal feedback, if that is the right word. I have tried something similar (with shoes on) and it involves driving as if an egg (that would break if pressed too hard) were taped to the gas pedal. One guy got 106 mpg out of his Insight, but cannot for the life of him, duplicate that again.
      Here is an interesting Insight website:
      • http://www.insightcentral.net/print-material.html

  8. Ethanol by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you live in the Midwest, it's very feasable to use a conventional gasoline car, just fill it up with ethanol. It burns cleaner, hotter, and more effeciently than traditional gas. More importantly, you will be supporting a fuel source that can be grown out of the earth, and unlike oil, you won't be giving your money to a foreign dictator or Texas oil-baron.

    1. Re:Ethanol by medcalf · · Score: 2
      More importantly, you will be supporting a fuel source that can be grown out of the earth, and unlike oil, you won't be giving your money to a foreign dictator or Texas oil-baron.

      As a Texan (not, sadly, an oil baron) and an ADM stockholder, I'd appreciate y'all taking his advice. More ethanol is better for all of us, or at least for me as the ADM stock price rises.

      --
      -- Two men say they're Jesus. One of them must be wrong. - Dire Straits
    2. Re:Ethanol by schematix · · Score: 0

      Not only will you be supporting the highly subsidized ethanol industry, but you will also be supporting the oil companies since energy is needed to make ethanol, which comes from oil. So either way you're helping big oil...not that its a bad thing.

      --
      Scott
    3. Re:Ethanol by Zathrus · · Score: 2

      As I recall, most car manufacturers will quickly void your engine warrantee if you use fuel with too high an ethanol content. I don't have my manual available at this moment, but I distinctly recall such a line in my new lawnmower manual (obviously a lawnmower engine is not equivalent to a car engine).

      As for the ethical bit -- didn't know Canada was ruled by a dictator, but I do know they're where the US gets the majority of its foreign oil from.

    4. Re:Ethanol by cDarwin · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you're concerned about maintaining your warranty, you might also look into flexible fuel vehicles, which run on ethanol/gasoline mixtures (some up to 100% ethanol!)

      --

      --
      Socrates was asked where he was from. He replied not "Athens," but "The world."

    5. Re:Ethanol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As for the ethical bit -- didn't know Canada was ruled by a dictator, but I do know they're where the US gets the majority of its foreign oil from.

      Oh, but we are. Chretien and Mugabe have an awful lot in common. Sure, we're working on deposing Chretien, but it might take so long as another year to do it.

    6. Re:Ethanol by karb · · Score: 1
      you won't be giving your money to a foreign dictator or Texas oil-baron.

      Good to see people support large corporate farming companies. You go! :)

      --

      Jack Valenti and the MPAA are to technology as the Boston strangler is to the woman home alone

    7. Re:Ethanol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh really ? Exactly who is it that we think is going to depose Chretien ? He's already proven that the opposition is so incompetent that he doesn't have to do anything to get reelected.....and the opposition was strong during that election than it is now!! There is no other party that's going to win the next federal election and all the midgets put together still won't force the Libs into a minority. Face it, we have a one party system masquerading as a democracy.

    8. Re:Ethanol by swb · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm not opposed to fuels created from plants grown in the ground.

      The bad things with Ethanol are:

      1) Its a false economy. Subsidized by lots of taxpayer dollars (direct, and indirect via forcing it into mixtures with gas). Its really just a crutch for farmers who can't quit the corn habit and ADM, which can't quit the free-government-money habit.

      2) It mostly (exclusively?) uses corn as its source, and I'm not convinced that corn is the best crop to provide a fuel source. What about hemp or some other crop that might require less insecticide, fertilizer, etc etc.

      3) It's kind of fuel-intensive to make. Planting, harvesting, fertilizing, insecticiding, AND DISTILLING all take machines that use fuel. If you get 20 gallons per acre (totally made-up) and you use 20 gallons per acre (again, totally made up) to make it, how "fuel efficient" is it?

      4) There have been complaints about ethanol wreaking havoc with engines. I'm pretty sure I've seen warnings in owners manuals not to use too high of an ethanol concentration.

      I'm sure there's a plant-to-fuel combination thats a winner -- low mechnical input to growth and harvesting, low energy input to distillation. Unfortunately I don't think ethanol is it -- its a way to get more money to corn farms in the midwest with some marginal pollution and oil dependency benefits.

    9. Re:Ethanol by realmolo · · Score: 0

      Uhh, ethanol doesn't hurt your engine. Any modern (as in, post 1983) car can handle it just fine. Do you really think that they would manufacture a car that COULDN'T handle ethanol? And if they did, wouldn't they tell you that when you bought it, and have warnings all over the car saying "Do Not Use Ethanol"? If the innards of your car rotted because you used ethanol because they didn't tell you NOT to, they'd be liable for the repairs. As well as being pretty vulnerable to a lawsuit. Think before you post, retards.

    10. Re:Ethanol by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 2

      I know that there are a lot of cars out there where you won't...my '98 Dodge Caravan, for one, says specifically on the gas cap that you can put in pure ethanol. In fact, my university makes a point of running mostly ethanol-only cars on campus.

    11. Re:Ethanol by M-G · · Score: 3, Informative

      It also contains less energy per gallon, so your MPG goes down when burning ethanol. So you have to have more tanker runs to the gas station, more electricity spent pumping that fuel into your car, etc. for the same number of miles driven.

    12. Re:Ethanol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "As I recall, most car manufacturers will quickly void your engine warrantee if you use fuel with too high an ethanol content."

      An automobile would never have this kind of restriction. This would only apply to 2 stroke engines, such as most lawnmowers.

    13. Re:Ethanol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Its a false economy. Subsidized by lots of taxpayer dollars (direct, and indirect via forcing it into mixtures with gas). Its really just a crutch for farmers who can't quit the corn habit and ADM, which can't quit the free-government-money habit."

      Oh, that evil welfare! someone stop these farm family welfare sows before its too late!

    14. Re:Ethanol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah and my car should also have a sticker saying "Do Not Drive Underwater". Oh but wait - it's OBVIOUS that I shouldn't do that, just like it's OBVIOUS that I shouldn't fill up a gasoline powered car with alcohol.

      Also, for what it's worth, most modern cars do have a small warning near the gas cap stating "Unleaded Gasoline Only".

      Think before you post, retard.

    15. Re:Ethanol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) More demand for corn = higher prices for corn = less government money. cake.

      2) There are several insect resistant corn hybrids.

      3) Argument based on made up numbers. Next.

      4) With what engines? My lawnmower? That beat up old '79 chevy that is now in a scrapyard? Name one!

    16. Re:Ethanol by mikec · · Score: 3, Informative

      It is questionable if ethanol saves any oil at all. In a good year (with high corn yields) ethanol production is slightly energy positive. That is, the energy content of a gallon of ethanol exceeds by approximately 16% the energy that goes into producing it. In a bad year, when yeilds are lower, it can easily require more than 80,000 BTU to produce a gallon of ethanol. (See, for example, this study. It is also questionable if ethanol reduces CO2 emissions. From that standpoint, it would probably be better to grow trees, which would recycle more CO2 than any reduction due to CO2.

    17. Re:Ethanol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know why I bother replying to fucktards like you, but here goes:

      1) Do you realize ethanol is 90% gasoline, fucktard?
      2) it is not 'obvious' that you would not put ethanol gasoline (aka gasahol) into an 'unleaded fuel only' automobile. Alcohol contains no lead, fucktard.

      Have a nice day, fucktard.

    18. Re:Ethanol by Strog · · Score: 1

      2) It mostly (exclusively?) uses corn as its source, and I'm not convinced that corn is the best crop to provide a fuel source. What about hemp or some other crop that might require less insecticide, fertilizer, etc etc.

      {sarcasm}Hemp, great idea.{/sarcasm} I grew up in farming country and there was so much wild stuff growing in the ditches, pastures, etc. you would have thought someone was growing it. Your suggestion sounds either uninformed or a subtle troll. I think probably the latter.

      Do you realize that it is the starch in the corn that produces the alchohol?

      The only product that is better than corn is potatoes (insert Quayle joke here). The funny thing is that there is an Ethanol plant across the road here at work.

    19. Re:Ethanol by dattaway · · Score: 2

      If I remember right, ethonal contains half the energy denisity as gasoline, so you have to rejet carburators for twice the flow. No major work, it just requires replacing a few orifices with a larger opening. A screwdriver is required.

      From what I hear, ethanol seems to wash away oil from the cylinder walls and rings. Propane does this too. The engine burns a little hotter due to this lubrication problem.

    20. Re:Ethanol by RobKow · · Score: 1

      What farm families? You mean huge agricultural conglomerates.

    21. Re:Ethanol by mikec · · Score: 5, Informative
      Sorry, I accidentally submitted before it was done.

      It is not at all clear that ethanol saves any oil at all.

      In a good year (with high corn yields) most studies show that ethanol production is slightly energy positive. That is, the energy content of a gallon of ethanol exceeds by approximately 15% the energy that goes into producing it. In a bad year, when yeilds are lower, it can easily require more than 80,000 BTU to produce a gallon of ethanol. (See, for example, this study.) On average it's probably about a wash. It would be interesting to see what the reaction would be to requiring ethanol producers to use ethanol instead of fossil fuel for all steps in production.

      It is also questionable whether ethanol reduces CO2 emissions. From that standpoint, it would probably be better to grow trees or hemp, which would recycle more CO2 than any reduction due to burning CO2 rather than fossil fuels.

    22. Re:Ethanol by nexthec · · Score: 1
      1) Do you realize ethanol is 90% gasoline, fucktard.

      http://www.afdc.doe.gov/altfuel/eth_general.html states:
      Ethanol (ethyl alcohol, grain alcohol, EtOH) is a clear, colorless liquid with a characteristic, agreeable odor. In dilute aqueous solution, it has a somewhat sweet flavor, but in more concentrated solutions it has a burning taste. Ethanol (CH3CH2OH) is a group of chemical compounds whose molecules contain a hydroxyl group, -OH, bonded to a carbon atom.

      I would say that does not inclue gasoline

    23. Re:Ethanol by maniac11 · · Score: 5, Informative

      >From Washington Post
      washingtonpost.com

      Ethanol's Ambitions
      Tuesday, April 16, 2002; Page A18

      THE ETHANOL lobby is normally content to fleece taxpayers in two ways.
      First, it promotes public payments to those who grow the corn from which
      ethanol is made: Right now the House and Senate are cooking up a terrible
      farm bill that would lock in 10 more years of subsidies. Second, the lobby
      has used the tax system to penalize gasoline that is not one-tenth made up
      of ethanol: Motorists who fill their cars with ethanol-free gas pay around 5
      cents extra per gallon. Some might reckon two federal favors enough, but the
      ethanol folks think bigger than that. A provision recently inserted into the
      Senate energy bill by Sen. Tom Daschle, the majority leader, and Sen. Jeff
      Bingaman, the energy committee chairman, would mandate a big jump in ethanol
      use and give ethanol producers protection against environmental liability.

      This outrage is disguised in reasonable garb: It is part of an effort to
      promote renewable sources of energy. But ethanol, though made from corn, can
      only loosely be thought of as renewable, since making it consumes nearly as
      much non-renewable oil as the ethanol replaces. Moreover, ethanol's
      environmental benefits are debated: Including it in gasoline reduces carbon
      monoxide emissions but can increase smog. In any case, a sane policy on
      renewables should give promising alternative energy sources a government
      boost, but it shouldn't pour billions in taxpayers' cash into products that
      will never be remotely viable. Remember, ethanol already gets government
      help: Since 1996, crop subsidies alone have been worth nearly $30 billion to
      the industry. Increasing this help would be going too far, even if ethanol's
      environmental merits were more certain.

      Both ethanol's drawbacks are reflected in the Senate's legislation. The bill
      creates a "safe harbor," protecting industry from suits arising out of
      defective additives in gasoline -- hardly a sign of confidence in ethanol's
      environmental merits. It also mandates increased ethanol consumption --
      again, hardly a sign that ethanol expects to gain market share on its own --
      requiring that gasoline refiners step up their use of ethanol from the
      current level of around 1.7 billion gallons a year to 5 billion gallons by
      2012. This mandated tripling of consumption might cause shortages and
      therefore price spikes, especially since the ethanol market is dominated by
      three producers, which could find ways to orchestrate scarcity and pocket
      windfall profits. The biggest producer is Archer Daniels Midland, which in
      1996 pleaded guilty to a charge of price-fixing and was fined $100 million.

      The four Democratic senators from California and New York are calling this
      ethanol provision what it is: a scheme to funnel money to agribusiness and
      corn states at the expense of the rest of the country. One amendment to
      limit the ethanol mandate was rebuffed last Thursday, but there may be
      another chance today. The Senate should back the effort to remove the
      ethanol provision from the energy bill, and Sen. Daschle should not resist,
      despite his farm-state loyalties. Democrats have been trying to score points
      against the Bush administration by demonstrating the link between corporate
      lobbyists and the White House energy policy. If the Senate's Democratic
      leaders now use the energy bill to funnel money to Archer Daniels Midland
      and its ilk, they'll look like hypocrites.

      --
      Guvegrra?
    24. Re:Ethanol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where do you eco-zealots come from? Somebody said auto manufacturers would void warranties if too much ethanol was used, and somebody quickly (and brilliantly) pointed out that an auto manufacturer would never do such a thing. That only applies to 2 stroke engines. Do you have any idea what the difference is. There are some smart people here, but there are also some real tools posting. For example...GE (general electric) said they will drop all warranties on any engine once bio-diesel is introduced into it. Is that enough proof for you? Probably not, since that statement doesn't say anything rosey about saving the environment or ending world hunger.

      How about this...the petrol based internal combustion engine is the most effficient thing out there right now. I know, I know...that simply can't be true because they kill a kitten everytime a car is built (10 for SUV's). Too bad, put down your Communist Manifesto and read something from the other side (even Marx said that capitalism must exist to provide everything to divide up).

      The great thing about modern society is the right to choose. Hey, if you want a solar car or one that runs on steam, go for it. Oh yeah, the other thing, don't bitch if i want a slug that weighs as much as your artist commune and gets the gas mileage of a tank.

      ANWR...should it be tapped for oil? Of course not. Then you'd kill everything that lives there, just like around the Alaskan pipeline...oh wait, those caribou are flourishing... hmmm...ok, well, it'll make the land ugly. That it will, I can't believe anyone would mar a piece of land the size of a state with an airport sized rig. Dripping with sarcasm? i wish it was venom.

    25. Re:Ethanol by corvi42 · · Score: 3, Informative

      What about hemp [...]

      Well hemp would be less effective than corn, because ethanol is made from the fermentation of sugars, so the more sugars in the plant - the more ethanol yielded. Yes, one can make alcohols from grains, but the yield is less. Fruits yield more alcholos per volume than grains - corn yields more than hemp. Something ideal might be sugar cane.

      --

      There are a thousand forms of subversion, but few can equal the convenience and immediacy of a cream pie -Noel Godin
    26. Re:Ethanol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      it just requires replacing a few orifices with a larger opening.

      Come on trolls, where is it?

    27. Re:Ethanol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure he meant that for each gallon of ethanol, 0.9 gallons of gasoline was used to produce it. According to previous posts, it can actually take more gallons of gasoline to produce a single gallon of ethanol. And considering that ethanol only has half of the energy density of gasoline and is tougher on engines, that's rather dismal.

    28. Re:Ethanol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, his original post was spouting off about how you can run pure ethanol in an internal combustion engine designed for gasoline. While this may be true, it is not WISE, at least not without making heavy modifications to your engine to protect it.

    29. Re:Ethanol by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but when Milwaukee switched to reformulated gas in 1995, which contains 10% ethanol, many people in the area were reportedly getting sick from the fumes at the gas station. It's mentioned in passing on the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel's website.

      --
      You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
    30. Re:Ethanol by Preposterous+Coward · · Score: 2
      You clearly intended sarcasm, but the situation is probably a lot worse than you think:

      The U.S. House of Representatives has approved and sent to the Senate a six-year farm bill authorizing support payments to farmers, conservation funding and increased incentives for renewable fuels production. ....
      The bill -- which has generated controversy overseas -- in its final form authorizes a $73,500 million limit on new spending on agriculture over the next 10 years and lowers the payment limit of annual subsidies to farmers from the current $460,000 to $360,000.

      Now, I would venture that if you can't make money farming with a $360,000 a year subsidy, you should find a different line of business. (I know that's the maximum, not the average, but clearly somebody is getting one heck of a free ride here...)

      There was also a story in the NYT (I think) recently about subsidies to cotton farmers in Mississippi. I don't remember the exact $$ and number of farmers, but doing the division worked out to an average of $125,000 in subsidies per individual. Not bad.

      --

      "Biped! Good cranial development. Evidently considerable human ancestry."
    31. Re:Ethanol by MrResistor · · Score: 2

      It's been a while since I've looked into it, but as I recall hemp oil is an excellent fuel source. It's really a replacement for diesel (aka bio-diesel), not gasoline, but the word is that it has high energy density and burns very clean. I've heard that the deisel engine was actually origionally designed specifically for hemp oil.

      The problem is that hemp bred for greater oil production is called marijuana, which Americans (or at least the US government) have some unfortunate issues with.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    32. Re:Ethanol by newt_sd · · Score: 1

      I agree with alot of what your saying especially since the local ethanol plant stinks up my yard but on the bad for cars issue. It was widely rumored that ethanol dries up gaskets and such due to the high alcohol content but that has been found not to be true so I am not sure that this is a valid argument. The rest of your argument is though

      --
      ***I GOT NUTHIN***
    33. Re:Ethanol by swb · · Score: 2

      1) Umm, giving away free money to motivate people only motivates them to take free money. You can't fix the overproduction of corn by subsidizing its further overproduction.

      2) "Several types of insect resistant hybrids" -- WOW, we've solved the pest and fertilization problems ALL IN ONE FELL SWOOP.

      3) Made up numbers, but made up for a point -- how much energy does it take to make ethanol vs. how much you get out of it? If we're burning 10 barrels of oil to make anything less than 15 barrels of ethanol we're clearly just rearranging deck chairs on the Titantic.

      4) With the engines in my cars. How spec'd out are there for high ethanol? I've only seen a VERY short list of Fords and maybe a Chevy or two that can run high/all ethanol. I don't drive one.

    34. Re:Ethanol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and its horrible for the environment.

      it may burn cleaner, but it gets into the ground water and is far worse.

      so basically i have to pay more for that crap in wisconsin, to ruin my engine, and "reduce" polution that was created by chicago

    35. Re:Ethanol by john82 · · Score: 1

      Obviously you don't know jack about the cost of farming. Notice that there are a hell of a lot LESS farmers these days? Hmm... that wouldn't be because it's really hard to consistently break even (forget profit).

      A 24x7 job, working regardless of the weather and trying to stay ahead of the bank. When you cite examples of subsidies, use your head and think of the COSTS involved: feed, fertilizer, equipment, farm loan, fuel, water, etc. How many farmers have you seen driving fancy cars and living in posh houses? None that I know of. Oh yeah, somebody is getting one heck of a free ride here...

      Finally, I reiterate that many farmers have already taken your suggestion and left agribusiness. At what point will you ask "what happened to all the farms?"

    36. Re:Ethanol by Phantasmo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I wonder if the Washington Post is getting a "subsidy" from an oil company...

      --

      The US Army: promoting democracy through unquestioned obedience
    37. Re:Ethanol by cDarwin · · Score: 1

      I think the parent was referring to use of hemp oil as a fuel, rather than to the distillation of EtOH from hemp material.

      --

      --
      Socrates was asked where he was from. He replied not "Athens," but "The world."

    38. Re:Ethanol by Geek+In+Training · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't disagree with the pro-ethanol enviromentals, nor the anti-subsidy libertarians... but let's try to take this one at face value:

      "3) It (Ethanol)'s kind of fuel-intensive to make. Planting, harvesting, fertilizing, insecticiding, AND DISTILLING all take machines that use fuel. If you get 20 gallons per acre (totally made-up) and you use 20 gallons per acre (again, totally made up) to make it, how "fuel efficient" is it?"

      Any it does not cost money to survey, drill, extract, store, transport, store again, refine, store again, transport again, store again, and then dispense petroleum distallates (crude -> gasoline)? Just because half of that labor is done at far lower cost than farm workers (who have a strong lobby with bought politicians) by workers of oil companies who have their own competing political pawns?

      Once again, elements of truth and elements of rhetoric in both arguments. Yes, ethanol burns cleaner and is renewable. Yes, it currently costs more to produce... for a number of reasons. But in either case, it costs money to make money, right? It takes energy to produce portable energy as well. The true technological advantages and disadvantages of ethanol may never be known, thanks to this political in-fighting.

      Sidebar: what about the organized labor lobby for highway workers who pour asphalt every four years on every major road in the US? They have successfully negotiated a decades-long congressional moratorium on deployment on an asphalt replacement made out of the chopped up bits of discarded tires; millions of which fill up plots across America. The cost is half as much, and has twice the durability. So there would be less asphalt produced, and half the labor needed. WE CAN'T HAVE THAT, CAN WE??? Jimmy Smith won't be able to lean on his shovel for fiften minutes out of every hour then go back to grinding up the old road surface for $23 an hour (and pay his union dues) if we take away half of his work!!

      Fascinating, how we let the lawyers, politicans, and corporatists rule us; and all the opposition that is out there are corrupt organizations masquerading as consumerists, special-interest groups, and employee-rights advocates, who are mainly just socialists who get a capitalist-sized paycheck. And we just sit around taking it, saying we'll vote for the other guy.

      Hint: There is no other guy.

      --
      SlashSigTheorem: Humorous, Political, Critical, Constructive- If you have a .sig, someone WILL complai
    39. Re:Ethanol by Darnit · · Score: 1

      This also helps out the small farmer. A raise in corn prices is good for all farmers. Better the money go to a farmer versus a terrorist.

    40. Re:Ethanol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any idea on how muchenergy it takes to produce hemp oil. I'm sure you don't just toss a few K's of weed in your trunk and run for miles. There has to be some kind of refinement process, and I am sure it takes quite a bit of energy to do it. Just because its different doesn't mean its better.

    41. Re:Ethanol by PrinceAshitaka · · Score: 1

      ethanol is also largly fermented and then distilled from soy beans

      --
      quis custodiet ipsos custodes
    42. Re:Ethanol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      QUOTE:
      1) Its a false economy. Subsidized by lots of taxpayer dollars (direct, and indirect via forcing it into mixtures with gas). Its really just a crutch for farmers who can't quit the corn habit and ADM, which can't quit the free-government-money habit.
      UNQUOTE

      What do you think oil is?? It is heavily subsidized
      by taxes. If USA citizens really paid the total
      cost of gasoline it would be >6 dollars per gallon.

      Brasil produces much Ethanol and mananges to do it
      is a self-sustaining manner, ie it produces more
      energy than it consumes.

    43. Re:Ethanol by galabar · · Score: 1

      I'll ask that shortly after I ask "what happened to all the water-wheel mill operators?", "where did all the ice house workers go?", or "why isn't there a parking spot for my horse in front of that Saloon?" I know, maybe we should refocus our efforts on saving the family computer chip manufacturer.

      We need to face the facts that certain practices become obsolete. The family farmer is an obsolete premise -- and only used by agrobusiness to extort more cash from government.

      What I find interesting is that your comment is completely void of any point -- do you think farmers should be getting this money, or are you only perturbed by someone assuming that farming is cheap and can be done with a $250,000 government subsidy?

    44. Re:Ethanol by tigga · · Score: 1
      3) You have to burn ethanol to make ethanol ;)

      The problem is rather of limited oil supplies, not economy...

    45. Re:Ethanol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      funny how the NYT, Hillary and Schumer never seem to complain about all those dairy subsidies. Oh, weait a second. thats because dairy production and all those gvt. subsidies are going to dairy farmers in New York! Maybe they should work on recycling all that methanol cows produce instead of letting it pollute the air (methanol is worse than CO2 as a green-house gas, not to mention it smells really bad).

    46. Re:Ethanol by V_drive · · Score: 1

      1) More demand for corn = higher prices for corn = less government money. cake.

      the point is that it costs much more to make ethanol from corn than people are willing to pay. the government has to subsidize the production because it would never last in a free economy. whether or not taxpayers should pay relatively large amounts of money so that relatively small amounts go to farmers rather than oppressive oil-producing countries is a philisophical discussion i'm not going to touch here. my point is that increased ethanol use will, in our current economic climate, require more government money because every incremental gallon sold is paid for partially by the buyer and partially by the taxpayers. increase the number sold and you have to increase the tax dollars spent. it is true that, because of economies of scale, the tax payer would pay a little less for each additional gallon sold if the goverment stays on top of things and is quick to adjust the taxpayer contribution, but it is far, far from hitting zero. therefore, each addition gallon sold means more tax dollars spent.

      no arguments on 2, 3, or 4 because i don't know cars or agriculture, just economics.

      --
      char *mySig;
    47. Re:Ethanol by Kintanon · · Score: 2

      Isn't farming a business? Aren't they supposed to be selling their food for money somewhere in there? If they can't make a living at current prices why don't they raise prices? Seems like they are voluntarily choosing to be poor for the good of humanity.

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    48. Re:Ethanol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Its a false economy. Subsidized by lots of taxpayer dollars (direct, and indirect via forcing it into mixtures with gas). Its really just a crutch for farmers who can't quit the corn habit and ADM, which can't quit the free-government-money habit.


      uhh... if you want to talk about subsidies you might want to talk about gasoline.

      foreign military involvement, subsidies, yadda yadda... i don't have the stats right in front of me - but, don't think your gallon of gas price represents it's true cost.

    49. Re:Ethanol by swb · · Score: 2

      Any it does not cost money to survey, drill, extract, store, transport, store again, refine, store again, transport again, store again, and then dispense petroleum distallates (crude -> gasoline)? Just because half of that labor is done at far lower cost than farm workers (who have a strong lobby with bought politicians) by workers of oil companies who have their own competing political pawns?

      Turning crude oil in the ground on the Arabian peninsula into gasoline in my midwestern car tank takes both money and energy, you're absolutely right.

      But if Ethanol *consumes* more energy than it takes to make it, where is the benfit? We need to come up with an agrifuel that allows us to make a net gain in energy, not just balance the equation.

    50. Re:Ethanol by fean · · Score: 1

      see... the worst part is that these farmers have nothing else to produce. I live in south dakota, and I hear about this every year.... from the sides of paranoid hippies AND the "cry for me because it didn't rain all last month" farmers....

      $125,000 is an aweful lot to live off of.... EXCEPT for when you have to pay laborers, pay for gas for the machinery, fix the machinery, etc....
      consider hiring 2 men (BARE minimum) for a summer... that's $30,000... so you're already down to $95,000
      then you factor in the fact that most wives work out at the farm... that comes down to ~$50,000 / person working... minus expenses... and they don't get squat for the corn they are producing... the only money they make is off the subsidy, but at least they are producing SOMETHING, rather than the posts here seem to suggest.

      come out here and live for a few years, and you'll realize that these farmers don't want to be producing corn and living off the government... these are people who are putting in REAL work, and still have to rely on the government, think of how humilating(sp) that is!

      but the farm is all they have, they can't decide to pick up a new trade, especially out here...

      maybe some day we'll stop importing so much food from other countries, and give our farmers something to grow, so they can make a living on their own... but until then, try not to pick on the FARMERS for the government's policies

    51. Re:Ethanol by fean · · Score: 1

      Yes... farming is a business.... so therefore it's a slave to the laws of supply and demand....

      if the government decides that they want more corn produced for ethanol, they give out subsidies to farmers... the farmers grow the corn....

      BUT if nobody uses the ethanol, then the ethanol producers don't need that much corn, so some farmers EVERYWHERE get stuck with grain-bins full of un-used corn....

      they don't volunteer to be poor... they're stuck with corn that is bio-engineered to be good for ethanol, and hence isn't much good for eating, feeding cattle, or anything else. But what else could they do? The US imports too much food, and doesnt export much, so the prices on almost all agricultural products is VERY low.

    52. Re:Ethanol by fean · · Score: 2, Insightful

      yeah, but every car produced within the last 5 years (and most within the last 10 years) can run on 80-90% ethanol....

      oh no... you can't run 100% ethanol... but at least do your part, and if nothing else, pay your countrymen rather than the foreigners... (and besides, it's cheaper because of the tax differences)

    53. Re:Ethanol by jamesl · · Score: 1

      The products of perfect combustion are CO2 and H2O -- carbon dioxide and water.

    54. Re:Ethanol by OwnedByTwoCats · · Score: 1

      So what happened with the bill? Did the Ethanol provisions stay in?

    55. Re:Ethanol by Kintanon · · Score: 2

      So farming is a BAD business to be in! Sell your land to a developer and retire. Yeesh. People act like it would be the end of the world if there weren't any more 'family' farms. Switch crops to something that you CAN sell for a profit. Whatever happened to Slashdotters objecting to the government legislating protection for a business model? If farming doesn't work then the farmers need to find something else to do.

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    56. Re:Ethanol by programic · · Score: 1

      I'm sure there's a plant-to-fuel combination thats a winner
      A horse with a saddle.

      --
      -- yawn. --
    57. Re:Ethanol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      every car produced within the last 5 years (and most within the last 10 years) can run on 80-90% ethanol...

      So how come the owner's manual for my 2002 WRX says not more than 15% ethanol? Was it produced 6 years ago, and just warehoused until I bought it? Or are you talking out of your ass, with no real knowledge or facts to back up your statement? Must be one of those two things...

    58. Re:Ethanol by MrResistor · · Score: 2

      I'd guess that it's produced just like any other plant or seed oil: pressed out and maybe filtered. Much lower production cost than ethanol, which has to be brewed.

      Also, I suspect there would be much lower costs to grow. There's a reason they call it weed, after all. As a friend of mine used to say, "It's so easy to grow, even stoners can do it!"

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    59. Re:Ethanol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's kind of fuel-intensive to make. Planting, harvesting, fertilizing, insecticiding, AND DISTILLING all take machines that use fuel.

      First snide comment: Yeah, because people just put a stick in the ground, and pump gasoline right into their tanks, right?

      Second: The note about planting, harvesting, fertilizing and insectisiding are irrelevant, because ethanol is a byproduct of corn production. So all that stuff is being done already.

    60. Re:Ethanol by beakburke · · Score: 1

      The problem is that the land never gets retired from production when small farms (and even some larger ones, if they happen to have a number of really bad years) go belly up and leave. Think about it, all that land in the middle of the us isnt going to be bought out by developers. Other farmers end up farming it. Thus its hard to reduce production. (this is why the gov't pays people to put a certain amout of their acres into CRP(conservation reserve program) and maintain it as a sort of "wild" land. Lots of this "government money" is CRP money and disaster money (like when a drought wipes out 90% of your crop, i don't see anyone complaining about FEMA bailing out small businesses that get destroyed by tornadoes and floods.)
      I will agree that "family farming" (where one family farms a small amount of land) is doomed because of "economies of scale" (farms need to keep getting bigger due to the kinds of technology we use)
      The sad thing is that farming is/was one of the few good examples of perfect competition, but i fear that it wont be too much longer before the barriers of entry to farming cause it to be a less competitive market.

      --
      ----- Question authority, but not ours. Hate the man, but we're not him.
    61. Re:Ethanol by An+dochasac · · Score: 2, Informative

      1) Ethanol has much more potential for a real economy than oil or "Zero emission" (i.e. coal burning) electric vehicles. In 1990 Deborah L. Bleviss and Peter Walzer published an article in Scientific American entitled, "Energy for Motor Vehicles." The conclusion was that alternative fuels such as ethanol and methanol would only be viable if gasoline prices approached $1.80/gallon. A few months later we entered the $61 billion Gulf War and gasoline prices began to rise to this break-even point. Likewise "Zero Emission" electric vehicles are based on a false economy. California's "zero emissions" vehicle law conveniently ignores the fact that more energy is required to charge a battery than they release. Ethanol has hundreds of times the energy storage density of the batteries used in the most advanced electric cars. 2) True there are probably better feed sources, R&D and scale economies will make these feasible. 3) Charles Schumer & Diane Feinstein and certain oil companies are pushing this misconception for political reasons. The often site a study by Pimentel but ignore others such as Keeny and Deluca, Marland and Turhollow(1991), Morris and Ahmed (1992), Ho (1989), Shapouri, Duffield and Graboski (1995)? Pimentel's study was the most pessimistic by almost a factor of two. The most recent of these studies "Estimating Net Energy Balance of Corn Ethanol"/AER-721 http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/aer721 concludes that when byproduct energy value is considered and modern production techniques are used, ethanol production has a net energy gain of 24% and it can extend petroleum imports by a factor of 7 to 1. None of these studies take into consideration the possibility that newer technology will make it possible to convert food and yard waste into fuel. Nor do they consider the energy storage value of ethanol. 4) The best I have here is personal experience: 1968 Plymouth Fury was the first car I burned an ethanol blend in, it wasn't even designed for unleaded gas. 140,000 miles + The upper half of the miles on these cars was on 10% ethanol: 1987 Chrysler LeBaron 178,000 miles + Fathers 1988 Mazda 323 240,000 Miles + Sister's 1990 Honda Accord 240,000 Miles + Higher percentages may not be compatible with seals, gaskets and hoses fittings on some cars. But it is time we convince the car companies that we expect them to be able to use flexible fuels. We don't need to be digging up ANWAR and we don't need Sadaam's oil.

    62. Re:Ethanol by fean · · Score: 1

      how much would you buy a bunch of land in the middle of nowhere for?.... not much, I'm sure.... and if you sell it to a developer, they aren't interested in the house or anything like that, so you aren't gonna get enough to move to some small apartment in a city. Then what will they do there? all of the skills they learned growing up (because they had to work the farm as kids, otherwise it woulda meant hiring another laborer) are now useless.

      The problem lies in the fact that the american people, despite all of their so called patriotism (i.e. wearing flags on their shirts cuz we got some buildings blown up... isn't that patriotism?[all apologies to real, pre 9/11 patriots out there]) won't pay attention to what the government is trying to do.... we live in a democracy, so there must be some reason the bills passed to give the farmers subsidies.... but just remember that EVERY time you buy gas w/o ethanol, you're wasting your tax dollars.... if you want something changed, vote for it, or against it, but whatever happens, live by it instead of complaining

    63. Re:Ethanol by fean · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, I meant it the other way around.... 80-90% gas, 10-20% ethanol.... damn typing at work, I lose train of thought in the middle of sentances....

    64. Re:Ethanol by thogard · · Score: 2

      My 86 VW Jetta's manual recomended no using more than two tanks of > 90% ethanol between tanks of gasoline unless you get the dealer to put on the ethaanol kit.

    65. Re:Ethanol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cost is not important as the net energy generated which is what counts. Oil has huge advantage because it has a high energy density. You are correct that it does take energy to get it in your tank. But the energy gain is still very positive.

      For example if a factory "makes" gasoline and I put in 100 gals and I get back 90 gals of gas. what good does that do us? You wasted 10 gals making the same 100 gals I started with?

      Why dont the ethanol plants run on ethanol instead of fossil fuels? If they were net energy positive they could burn their own ethanol.

    66. Re:Ethanol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Checked the study and thanks for the link.

      The ethanol coproducts take up 20% of inputs from ethanol which leaves only a net +4% for liquid ethanol if the process nets 124% energy output from a 100% input. Not much..

      When the ethanol plants start burning their own ethanol then I will believe it is real. If ethanol is so fossil fuel dependent ethanol production costs will increase when fossil fuel energy increases. Hopefully the technology improves much more.

      I am on your side but call me the skeptic.

    67. Re:Ethanol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Distillation is cheap, cheap, cheap. You can do it with sunlight if you care to. Ethanol plants are very efficient. The inefficiencies come in at the farming level.

      The notion of using hemp oil is just bizarre. It reminds me of the people who insist that hemp makes better paper than wood pulp and cotton do. They feel the need to justify hemp as some kind of wonder plant. What they don't seem to realize is that hemp already has plenty of uses and is an important crop to many farmers.

      But if you want to product oil cheaply, it is actually very much more efficient to use corn or soybean. (Rapeseed is also a good food oil but is a bit more expensive).

    68. Re:Ethanol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure potatoes are considerably more expensive to farm than corn or soybean. (By corn I mean dent corn, not the sweet corn that you buy on the cob). The great thing about potatoes is that you can grow them in places where you cannot grow corn or wheat. (Well, that and they taste very good when mashed with a lot of butter.)

    69. Re:Ethanol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely the best of all would be to grow farms of fast growing trees and thin them out periodically (planting and nurturing new ones of course). It might be best to try to bury the excess wood where it will not be accessible to oxygen.

    70. Re:Ethanol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When reformulated gas was introduced in Milwaukee, some of it was a blend of the oil industry approved oxidizer "MTBE" instead of ethanol. MTBE had a much more offensive smell when cold temperatures prevented it from atomizing and burning completely. MTBE also polluted ground water with a foul taste in parts of the country where they never switched to ethanol. When Milwaukee switched from MTBE to Ethanol blends, the complaints stopped.

      Consider this. What if the Exon Valdez had contained ethanol? (which dissolves in sea water.)

      BTW I once drove past a factory in Milwaukee and had partially fermented beer sprayed out of a smokestack onto my car. Now that was a bit of an overwhelming smell. "...honest officer, it was raining beer."

    71. Re:Ethanol by Quila · · Score: 2

      My '86 Scirocco started clunking somewhere in the engine after I filled up with gas with too much ethanol. Never again.

  9. Call me ignorant if you like... by Ignorant+Cocksucker · · Score: 0
    But doesn't driving an electric / hybrid vehicle take all the fun out of driving ? Wouldn't you be much better off with a high performance European sports sedan such as this one?

    You could feel just as smug in one of those as you do in an electric car, just for different reasons, and you could still burn people off at the lights !!!

    1. Re:Call me ignorant if you like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      high performance European sports sedan

      There's an oxymoron. Can it take an LS6 Chevelle?

    2. Re:Call me ignorant if you like... by Ignorant+Cocksucker · · Score: 0

      That depends. Will there be any corners in the track ;-)

    3. Re:Call me ignorant if you like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two things:

      1) Using modern wheels & tires, you'd still lose.

      2) You specifically mentioned "burning people off at the lights". When you burn me at a light, we'll talk about corners.

    4. Re:Call me ignorant if you like... by Ignorant+Cocksucker · · Score: 0

      The M3 has "Launch Control". Unless you are a qualified race driver, most humans cannot compete with that sort of technology.

  10. The problem with all these cars... by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 2

    ...is that they all look like ass.

    I actually semi-considered getting an Insight until I saw the fucking thing. It's hideous! It looks like a squashed milk carton. The one I saw was barf-green, too, which didn't help matters much.

    I ended up getting a 3-series instead, which not only doesn't look like ass, but also has no problem going over 65. (I guess I'm a Bad Person for using a gasoline-powered car though.)

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    1. Re:The problem with all these cars... by coug_ · · Score: 1

      There's also the Civic hybrid if looks are an issue.

    2. Re:The problem with all these cars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're the ass..

      My Honda Insight has no problem getting me to work at ~80MPH every day and I consistently get >55MPG. Certainly not the 60-70 advertised, but hey, I'm going 80. I just bought the Civic Hybrid for my wife. It's fantastic. Not as easy to get the MPG up with the way she drives, but it's still pretty good.

      They're both gasoline powered. The only difference is that by driving the "3-series" you have about 50000 other cars on the road that look exactly like yours. Congratulations, you're an idiot.

    3. Re:The problem with all these cars... by MayorDefacto · · Score: 1

      Actually, the original poster mentioned that she and her husband had a GM EV-1, which has to be the pug-ugliest of the lot when it comes to fugley alt-nrg cars! So, really, an Insight or Prius would be a step up... Way back when GM was making the EV-1, I had a conspiracy theory as to why it was so ugly. GM was really pushed by mandate to produce these things. As I recall, they weren't too happy about having to do so. I think they made them ugly on purpose, so that they wouldn't sell. Then, GM could say to the Gov't, "Look, we're making alternative energy cars, but nobody wants to buy them! The market has spoken!"

    4. Re:The problem with all these cars... by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      >> It looks like a squashed milk carton.

      I'll bet after it gets tagged by a drunk in a Durango, then it *really* looks like a squashed milk carton. Plus the E46 probably qualifies for ULEV status anyhow.

    5. Re:The problem with all these cars... by asv108 · · Score: 2

      Actually, if you at all domestic 3-series sales from 1976-1999, by sales alone there are 153,658 BMW 3-series on the road. With new sales and junked cars accounted for, there are probably ~100,000 BMW 3 series on the road. There are ~287 million people in the US right now so that means that one out of every three thousand people in the US owns a three series, that's rare enough for me. Plus, good luck with the ladies in an electric econobox.

    6. Re:The problem with all these cars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that GM screwed around with the EV1 on purpose but I think a high price was more effective than ugly styling. GM used an aluminum chassis (something they've never done before and expensive to make), an AC motor/inverter (a DC motor/controller with a 3-speed transmission would have done just as well performance wise and cost a whole lot less), and their proprietary Magnecharge charging paddle so you had to buy the expensive charger too.

    7. Re:The problem with all these cars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was going to get a Honda insight but I decided to get a Grand Prix GTP instead. I presume an Insight is about 50 HP right? :-) 0-60 in 3.4 minutes.

    8. Re:The problem with all these cars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bahahahahah!

      God, you're an idiot.

      Yeah, when I go shop for cars, I presume everything. You got a "Grand Prix GTP".. wow, I presume it's fast, because it's named after a car race.... weeee!

    9. Re:The problem with all these cars... by M-G · · Score: 2

      The only difference is that by driving the "3-series" you have about 50000 other cars on the road that look exactly like yours.

      A Honda driver actually wrote this? Pot...kettle...black...

    10. Re:The problem with all these cars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that doesn't look like ass?

    11. Re:The problem with all these cars... by ProfBooty · · Score: 1

      get a VW tdi, they look like regular production cars and have similar performance to their 2.0 (read 2.slow)models

      --
      Bring back the old version of slashdot.
    12. Re:The problem with all these cars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      look out for the supercharged 2.not-so-slows tho.......

      maybe we can get a petition started on vwvortex to get Neuspeed to produce a 20 bar turbo kit for the TDi......

    13. Re:The problem with all these cars... by slashhax0r · · Score: 1

      Rock on man.. i got a 5 series and a 2002.. bmw owns them all. :)

    14. Re:The problem with all these cars... by jafac · · Score: 2

      IMO the 3 series looks just like a Honda Accord. If you're buying a 3 series, you can't afford a real BMW.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    15. Re:The problem with all these cars... by mattster999 · · Score: 1

      A 2000 Honda Insight driver, number 3289 of ~5000 worldwide... I'm talking about the late-model 3-series in silver... with the 5-spoke wheels.. did I guess right? I pass about 10 of those on the way to work every day.

    16. Re:The problem with all these cars... by mattster999 · · Score: 1

      I don't need a car to give me luck with the ladies... I'm not cruizin fer chicks in my hot ride, d00d. Cars are for transportation... nothing more.

    17. Re:The problem with all these cars... by two-bookoo! · · Score: 0
      Ok, this post sucks... (for a few reasons) I drive a 3 series for a few reasons.

      1) it is confortable (for those in the front seats)
      2) it is quick
      3) it is not a full size sedan
      4) i live in DC and have to parallel park
      5) the gas milage is 25 city - and 34 Hwy
      6) it looks much nicer then a rice'd out Accord
      And the second reason this sucks, is the moderators gave it a score of 2 for saying it looks like an Accord....

      BTW- If you drive a BMW gingerly, you can get great gas milage out of it. i have frequently pulled about 500 miles on one 15 gallon tank.

    18. Re:The problem with all these cars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would not call a 3-series quick under any condition. A silver convert. couldn't keep up with my 98 mustang, which is bone-stock and only pulls a 14.7-14.8sec quarter mile time (me driving).

      You should have gotten a Protege 5 and dropped in the 1.8-turbo Japanese engine if you really wanted qualities 1-6 in your post.

    19. Re:The problem with all these cars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 3-series is available with a range of engines.

      If you ain't happy with the 3xx, get an M3.

    20. Re:The problem with all these cars... by two-bookoo! · · Score: 1
      aparently you really don't know to much about cars. first of all, A car that runs lower 15's in the quarter is fast.

      Second, quick does not mean that i race or have the desire to race with it, but i can and do have the power to accelerate when getting on the hwy or passing trucks. and Finally) if you think that a protege 5 is confortable compaired to a BMW, you apparently have not driven or riden in one.

      and you mentioned that the convertable could not keep up with your mustang (are you compensating for somthing, a small one maybe? ) last time i check converable's are slow as poop- think about that- top that moves- electic motor weightadditional safty nonsence for flipping - weight. No rigid roof- poor handling as the chassis will flex.

    21. Re:The problem with all these cars... by Quila · · Score: 2

      I haven't seen another of my car in about four months, and that's with a round-trip commute of 75 miles a day in traffic. I love the Elise.

    22. Re:The problem with all these cars... by M-G · · Score: 2

      Well yeah, but the Elise is a Lotus...you can't swing a dead cat without hitting a Honda.

  11. I remember a cool alt-fuel car... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I recall correctly, the modified delorean in BTTF2 ran on trash courtesy a device called Mr. Fusion.

    You may want to look into that.

  12. Honda civic hybrid by jgilbert · · Score: 1

    There's also a civic model that's a hybrid (like the insight) for 2003.

    Civic Hybrid

  13. My experiences with the Prius by Ryu2 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm a very happy owner of the Toyota Prius... I've actually gotten about 55 MPG in city driving, assuming I'm not in a hurry, above even the manufacturer's figures. It has been 100% reliable thus far.

    I was considering the Insight, but it's only two seats, and two doors as you mentioned, so I decided to go with the Prius, as it's basically the same size as any other compact sedan.

    I was looking into pure electric and gas cars, but decided not to at this time, because sometimes I like to take long-distance trips (eg, between the Bay Area, and LA, or to Nevada/Las Vegas) and there are no electric or gas refueling stations for long stretches outside urban areas, making long-distance road trips impossible with these vehicles' current range.

    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/toyota-prius/ It might be useful for you as well, although it's geared more towards current owners.

    As for the car itself, It's proven to be 100% reliable thus far in the 14 months that I've had it, and I've been averaging 50 MPG or so. It definitely is worth it, at least for me, since I commute about 45 miles a day round trip.

    If you have any specific questions, feel free to ask me. If you want an independent assessment, john1701a.com has a lot of info on it from a owner. The group groups.yahoo.com/group/toyota-prius/ has a lot to offer as well with many helpful people.

    Finally, since this is /. after all, there's a growing subculture dedicated to "hacking" the prius (eg, installing MP3 players that integrate with the onboard touchscreen system, or even wiring video input into the screen, installing cameras for seeing when you back up, etc... :-) )

    --
    There's 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
    1. Re:My experiences with the Prius by tevk · · Score: 1

      I was going to post about my experience with my Prius, but your post pretty much covers everything I was going to say.

      The only difference with me is that I am in MA, so I've driven my Prius in the winter (had it about a year now). I take the highway to work, so my mileage is lower (around 45mpg) but I get around 55mpg when driving in the city (that route takes 15mins longer to work, though).

      It works great for commutes to work, and also for trips up to Maine (4-5 hour drive). Had it a year and no problems at all, very happy with it.

      When I was shopping around for vehicles, I tried the Insight, but it had poor visibilty compared to the Prius. Plus, the Insight's only a 2-seater, so not much room.

    2. Re:My experiences with the Prius by sporktoast · · Score: 2
      --
      In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost of Windows upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss.
    3. Re:My experiences with the Prius by KirkH · · Score: 1

      It definitely is worth it, at least for me, since I commute about 45 miles a day round trip.

      How much of a premium does one pay for a hybrid car? I really don't know, that's why I'm asking. I have "heard" that it's a few thousand bucks above an equivalent conventional car.

      I've often thought that the savings on gas would make up for the difference, but in reality it seems like it would take a couple years to reach the break-even point.

      For example, if you drive 50 miles a day, you're using about 1 gallon per day in your Prius. Let's assume a conventional car (like my Honda) gets about 20 MPG. The Honda is using 2.5 as much gas as your Prius. So on a yearly basis, let's say the Prius is burning 365 gallons a year (a gallon per day, every single day), and the conventional car burns 912.5 (365*2.5) gallons.

      A gallon of the good stuff around here is $1.50, but let's bump that up to $1.75 to try and avoid under-estimation for an average. Using these numbers, the Prius costs 1.75 * 365 = $638.75 in gas per year to run, and the conventional car costs 1.75 * 912.5 = $1596.88. The difference is roughly $1000.

      So after three or four years, you reach the break-even point from gas savings due to the higher initial cost of a hybrid car. And remember that this is using what I would consider an over-estimation on savings; these figures assume you're putting over 18,000 miles on your car each year, which I believe is above the average. For someone like me, who commutes about 30 miles a day and where gas costs are lower, it would take about twice as long (6-8 years!) to make up the difference.

      I know this wasn't the main point of your post, but it's something I'd thought about before and I was surprised that the gas savings weren't greater after I worked through the numbers.

      I'll readily admit that the hybrid cars are becoming very attractive from an environment-friendly point of view, but from a purely economics standpoint, I don't think they're quite there yet.

    4. Re:My experiences with the Prius by dattaway · · Score: 2

      How much of a premium does one pay for a hybrid car?

      Don't buy a Prius becuase it will pay itself off in a few years, buy it because it is a higher quality car. If you own one of these, you will see and feel what I mean.

    5. Re:My experiences with the Prius by NaturePhotog · · Score: 2

      There isn't an equivalent non-hybrid Toyota to compare with the Prius, but the number I was told is the hybrid is basically a $2,000 premium (with the base price at around $20,000, so vs. $18,000). No bargaining since they're in such demand, but Toyota is making money on them now which is a good sign.

      Your math looks right (at least to my cold-addled brain :-) Hybrids make both economic and environmental sense here in California. Depending on whether the governor signs the upcoming bill or not, they may even be required for auto makers to meet the new standards.

      Gas is around $1.75-$1.85 a gallon (for the cheap stuff) in the SF Bay Area right now, and has been much worse. There's also enough traffic on the roads that our Prius does a bit better than the manufacturer's numbers (45 MPG highway, 52 MPG city) because speeds are lower. Between my wife's twice a week commute and other driving, and the car it replaced (at ~30 MPG), we figure it will take 5-7 years to pay for the difference. But we plan to have the car at least that long.

      It's also a lot safer than the car it replaced (front and side airbags, anti-lock brakes, does well in crash tests), and much more reliable, too. I don't worry about my wife and her carpool partners like I did with the old car.

      Add all that to the SULEV (Super Ultra Low Emission Vehicle) status (ZEV = Zero Emission Vehicle = electric is the only better rating), and it makes a lot of environmental sense, too. Yes, no car would be even better, but this is a good practical choice that's available if you have to have a car.

    6. Re:My experiences with the Prius by NaturePhotog · · Score: 2

      Another vote for the Prius. My wife and I love ours -- best car either of us has ever owned. We also get somewhat better mileage than the manufacturer's numbers. As part of a caravan of vehicles taking a youth group to Mexico to build a house, I got 53 MPG over a 600 mile trip down there, with 4 adult-sized people and a trunkful of camping gear and construction equipment.

      Not only does the car get better mileage, but it's SULEV (Super Ultra Low Emission Vehicle) meaning it pollutes a lot less, too. It's safer and more reliable than the old car it replaced, so I don't worry as much about my wife and her carpool partners out on the road.

      From an evironmental standpoint, no car would be even better, but mass transit isn't really an option 100% of the time. Everytime we vote for more mass transit around here, it seems they just build more freeways instead. And they can't seem to fathom that the transit systems need to work together for people to get from point A to point B in non-geologic time.

      The Prius also has a cool factor, with geeks because of the in-dash display to play with and hack, with the environmentally-concious set here in the SF Bay Area, and with kids because of all of the above.

    7. Re:My experiences with the Prius by Locutus · · Score: 2

      I know there are no numbers for this yet and it will be years before there are but what about mainenance?

      Remember, the hybrid (at least my Prius) puts alot less wear and tear on the ICE (gas engine) and because it is actually spun-up before ignition there's far less wear from starting/stopping. This should result in less ICE repairs.

      Then there's the braking. With regenerative breaking, electrical energy is used to help slow the car down so the brake pads/shoes and rotors/drums will all wear less. This should result in less/fewer brake jobs.

      Then there's the fact that there pretty much is NO transmission ( planetary gear system only ). I would expect this to last far longer than any standard or automatic transmission because there is no sliding/slipping of gears. Just a constant messing of teeth/gears. This should result in little to no transmission problems.

      Then theres the fact that there is no hydraulic steering fluid to help boost steering. The electric motor could wear out but there's no hoses, pumps, etc to deal with. This should result in little to no power steering problems.

      What did I miss? The batteries might need replacing (some of them) in 8 or so years but the rest of the car should be VERY LOW MAINTENANCE.

      Ah, but who thinks about TCO these days. ;)

      LoB
      ( Eat My Voltage, George Dubby )

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    8. Re:My experiences with the Prius by sahai · · Score: 1

      Let me start out by saying that I really like my Prius and have enjoyed driving it for over a year and a half now. But there are some shortcomings that I have noticed that nobody else has mentioned yet.

      1) The milage on very short trips is substantially worse than the numbers quoted here. I live about 1.5 miles from where I work and sometimes drive my Prius instead of walking. On such trips the milage is in the low 40's or high 30's. It gets even worse for micro-trips like those taken by the parking attendants who double park my car when the lot is full and move it around when someone needs to get behind it.

      This is a far cry from the 50+ it can get if it is warmed up and going on a long city drive. But long city drives are presumably quite rare as compared to short trips to the neighborhood grocery store, etc. So the city milage numbers they advertise are a bit misleading. The technical problem is that there is no waying of hinting to the car that this is only going to be a very short trip so don't bother trying to warm the car up. My milage average now hovers around 43 or so as compared to the around 48 I used to average when I commuted 30mi/day on the highway.

      2) Using the air conditioner activates the engine even if the car is standing still. From my experience, it appears that it can not drive the AC from the battery.

      I wish that the software for the engine was Free Software and that the car had an usb port or something so that enterprising folks could add hinting to the control of the car.

    9. Re:My experiences with the Prius by Ryu2 · · Score: 2

      Also, oil needs to be replaced only once every 7500 miles, compared to about 3000 miles for most gas cars. Don't forget -- Toyota includes all scheduled maintenence for the first 22500 or 30000 miles (I forgot which, one of those two) for FREE as well.

      --
      There's 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
    10. Re:My experiences with the Prius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You actually don't make your money back in three or four years. The value of $4000 today is not the value of $4000 dollars in 4 installments of $1000 dollars each over a period of four years. So many people like to think that they "make back" thier money, but in the end it really depends how reliable these cars are over the long run. If my Accord last for 10 years and your Insight for 8 then it is going to take an act of God for you to get a better deal on your car then mine.

    11. Re:My experiences with the Prius by patchmaster · · Score: 1

      All these hybrid cars are based on econo boxes. The Prius has the same body as the Echo. It may be a different car with different features and build quality, but it's still going to be the same size. To be fair with the mileage comparison, you need to look at cars of roughly the same size. The Echo automatic is supposed to get 31 city, 38 highway. Split the difference and figure 34.5. With this mileage and using your assumptions on cost and number of miles driven, the difference in fuel cost is $287 a year. At that rate you're really never going to recover the additional initial cost.

  14. how about an electric porsche convertible? by avi33 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This one seems to fit the bill, but it just blows away the others in the style department. Too bad that breathy carburated engine sound is replaced with, well, nothing...

    http://www.renewables.com/ElectricSpyder.htm

    1. Re:how about an electric porsche convertible? by vrmlknight · · Score: 1

      thats amazing if my math is right their racing model can get up to 320HP not too shabby

      --
      This must be Thursday, I never could get the hang of Thursdays.
    2. Re:how about an electric porsche convertible? by nathanm · · Score: 2
      From the website:
      Enjoy performance without emissions.
      So that column of smoke rising from the power plant doesn't count as emissions? Electric cars still rely on fossil fuel, & they're much less efficient than internal combustion powered cars.
    3. Re:how about an electric porsche convertible? by jafac · · Score: 2

      How about a post that's worthy of an Interesting mod?

      Porsche (the man, not the car company) built the first electric car. I think he may have been working for Mercedes at the time tho.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    4. Re:how about an electric porsche convertible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That'd make a nice match to my 356 - http://www.356registry.org

  15. I suggest getting a hybrid by RayChuang · · Score: 2

    If you are willing to buy a hybrid car, get either the Honda Civic Hybrid or the Toyota Prius.

    The nice thing about a hybrid car is that not only do you get extremely low emissions (both cars I mentioned meet the world's toughest standard for gas-powered automobile engines, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) Super-Ultra Low Emissions Vehicle (SULEV) standard), but you can refuel from any gasoline station and get way over 400 miles between fillups.

    Note that the Prius does take some getting used to though. The instrument panel is located on the center of the dashboard, the acceleration and braking on the Prius feels a bit different than a regular car in many ways. Mind you, the Prius has excellent interior room and a surprisingly roomy trunk, not a mean feat with space needed to hold the batteries.

    --
    Raymond in Mountain View, CA
  16. EV1 == very interesting ride by jamesmartinluther · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I took a test drive at the local Saturn dealership and, well, I was amazed at the smooth (and very powerful) acceleration. I had expected anemic performance and what I got was a rather wild drive through the city. While the need to recharge the battery and small size may be serious drawbacks, the sheer joy of taking this car for a spin really made me think about applying for one.

    It is disappointing that electric cars are not yet economically viable. Just take one for a test drive and you will see that there is a lot more work to be done in improving personal transportation.

    1. Re:EV1 == very interesting ride by silentbozo · · Score: 2

      I was amazed at the smooth (and very powerful) acceleration.

      Electric cars can accelerate faster than comparable gas counterparts at the expense of power usage. Most people are familiar with golf carts, which use low voltage (48v dc) and small motors, but their heftier cousins at the race track use crazy monster motors juiced up at 144+ vdc. (There is a National ELECTRIC Drag Racing Association, lots of homebuilt electric dragsters, laying patches of rubber.)

      It is disappointing that electric cars are not yet economically viable.

      While the EV-1 is a nice demonstration car, it's a very bad example of how to go about building an economical electric vehicle. For one thing, the EV-1 uses AC power for the drivetrain - theoretically more efficient, but it requires a very expensive custom-built AC controller to deliver power to the motor(s?). A cheaper mass-market controller forms the basis for many more conventional DC gas to electric conversions.

      The biggest cost (and inconvenience) is the batteries. The cheapest batteries are lead-acid (and they're environmentally friendly - 99% of lead in the US is recycled, as opposed to stuff like ni-cad) and even then, they need to be replaced every 3-4 years. Charging will cost you a few hours, and requires lots of amps, preferably at 220v. Plus, most EV charging stations use proprietary connectors (magna-charger paddle) designed for cars like the EV-1.

      I once took a ride in a converted Ford Escort, and the ride was comparable to a gas car, except there was no engine noise. Its kind of eerie to be accelerating, and only have road and tire noise - you know you're not coasting, but that's what it sounds like.

      If you go homebrew electric, don't be put off by the extremists that tell you to basically get a subcompact car to stick your batteries and motor into. There have been conversions of race cars, and suvs - not every environmentally friendly car has to be ultra-tiny and inconvenient (if not downright uncomfortable!) The biggest advantage to getting a light platform is greater range for less weight (less body weight means smaller motor, less batteries which in turns means less weight, meaning you can get away with an even smaller motor and less batteries...) but if you're willing to carry more batteries, you can use a larger platform.

      For long distance trips, you can hybridize your electric car by using a generator trailer. Don't use a hardware store 4-stroke generator - those things are emissions menaces. If you know enough to rip the gas motor out of a gas car (usually used, unless you're rich enough to convert a brand new car) and replace it with an electric motor, you should know enough to mount a nice VTEC engine with emissions system in a compact trailer, and mate it to an efficient generator. With this, long distance drives can be fueled with gas, and you can still do electric once you hit your destination (just park the trailer.)

      NEDRA maintains a page of links, and I really like these guys: http://www.Wilde-EVolutions.com

    2. Re:EV1 == very interesting ride by nathanm · · Score: 2
      It is disappointing that electric cars are not yet economically viable.
      Electric cars will never be more economically viable than internal combustion powered ones. They're simply less efficient, but still rely on fossil fuels (from power plants).
    3. Re:EV1 == very interesting ride by silentbozo · · Score: 2

      You're ignoring one very special case where EVs (and some hybrids) consume less resources (and generate less pollution) than gas vehicles: when they're sitting in traffic. The gas vehicle idles and continues chewing through its fuel supply at an inefficient idle level - the electric vehicle just sits there, and doesn't draw power until it moves (unless you're playing MP3s or enjoying the A/C.)

      Not to mention, you could always get your power from renewable sources (like solar or hydro). Practically speaking though, Nuclear or hydro are really the only ways to supply the power needs of the future, problem is that both are hotly opposed by environmentalists...

    4. Re:EV1 == very interesting ride by nathanm · · Score: 2
      You're ignoring one very special case where EVs (and some hybrids) consume less resources (and generate less pollution) than gas vehicles: when they're sitting in traffic.
      Correct, in some short distance, stop-n-go traffic situations, electric cars might consume less resources. However, sitting idle doesn't get you anywhere. Per distance travelled, internal combustion powered cars are much more efficient than electric cars, and they get there much faster.
      Not to mention, you could always get your power from renewable sources (like solar or hydro). Practically speaking though, Nuclear or hydro are really the only ways to supply the power needs of the future, problem is that both are hotly opposed by environmentalists...
      That's the main problem. Greens (or whatever they want to be called) want to reduce pollution, but don't want to let us replace fossil fuel burning power plants with safe, modern nuclear plants. So-called renewable power, like wind & solar, will never be economically feasible.
    5. Re:EV1 == very interesting ride by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Electric vehicles are much more efficient than
      IC engines... several times more efficient.
      And here in California, the electricity is
      fairly clean. I have 2.4kW of photovoltaics on
      the roof.. I can make my own fuel. You can't
      do that with gasoline. EVs are also much much
      cleaner than the cleanest ICE (internal combustion) The upstream emissions for the EV
      (NG power plant) are much less than the upstream emissions for and ICE (drilling, transporting, refining, transporting again, refueling).. so even if your ICE had NO TAILPIPE it would still be a lot more dirty than an EV (especially in CA).
      I don't know all the numbers off the top of my
      head, but an ICE is usually about 12%-15% efficient, maybe 20% for a hypebrid. And if you're waiting for fool-cells, you've got plenty of time on your hands. Using renewable power to make H2 via electrolysis is 3 or 4 times LESS efficient than simply charging a battery. The electric motor converts most of the energy to usable power (90%?) Charging and discharging batteries probably cost 30% or so.. That still puts the EV over 50%.. much better than 13%.
      Yes batteries are expensive, yes they're heavy...
      but for efficiency, nothing else comes CLOSE.

      I'm really going to miss my EV1. GM says I can't
      extend my lease (unlike Honda EV+ drivers).. and
      I've even asked nicely. GM just wants to crush
      these cars... and file lawsuits against the state
      of California. If you're hooked on home refueling and dread going back to the gas station (like me) about your only real option is the Toyota RAV4-EV
      and that's only if you're in California.
      Eventually the Ford/Th!nk City will be out.. also
      there's the Corbin Sparrow.. but for a decent size, decent speed, decent range EV the only thing
      left is Toyota RAV4-EV.

      Greg Hanssen... too lazy to sign up for slashdot

    6. Re:EV1 == very interesting ride by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My EV1 was a good deal faster than most ICE
      vehicles... much more fun. And as I mentioned
      before the EV is much more efficient.

      I have no problem with nukes, but you're wrong about wind power not being feasible. With state
      subsidies, even Solar is affordable.

      Greg Hanssen

    7. Re:EV1 == very interesting ride by nathanm · · Score: 2
      My EV1 was a good deal faster than most ICE vehicles... much more fun. And as I mentioned before the EV is much more efficient.
      I'd race you any day of the week! How fun a vehicle feels is entirely personal preference. I much prefer the low rumble of an American V8.
      I have no problem with nukes, but you're wrong about wind power not being feasible. With state subsidies, even Solar is affordable.
      We should eliminate all subsidies! Corporations, farmers, and whoever else is getting them should have to compete in the market like everyone else.
  17. get a hybrid by asavage · · Score: 1
    they are very fuel efficient. Here is a good site
    from this site:

    HEVs have several advantages over conventional vehicles:

    • Regenerative braking capability helps minimize energy loss and recover the energy used to slow down or stop a vehicle.
    • Engines can be sized to accommodate average load, not peak load, which reduces the engine's weight.
    • Fuel efficiency is greatly increased (hybrids consume significantly less fuel than vehicles powered by gasoline alone).
    • Emissions are greatly decreased.
    • HEVs can reduce dependency on fossil fuels because they can run on alternative fuels.
    • Special lightweight materials are used to reduce the overall vehicle weight of HEVs.
  18. Just get a horse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unlimited range, abundant cheap fuel, eco-friendly "exhaust," low maintenence, and a really expansive sunroof!

  19. motorcycle or tiny diesel by gmhowell · · Score: 2

    Get a motorcycle with a hack. A used GoldWing with a sidecar will set you back less than $20,000. It runs on regular fuel, and will likely get between 35-40 mpg. You can use the carpool lane solo. You should get almost 200 miles to the fillup and hitting 65 is no problem. Breaking the ton with a hack should be doable.

    An electric car is not an alternative fuel unless all of the power from your grid is via solar or wind (I don't count hydro, as this usually comes from a dam that disrupted local flora/fauna).

    You may also want to consider one of the many turbo-diesel cars available. Gas mileage comparable to the motorcycle with more crash-worthiness.

    In addition, there are many other CNG vehicles available than the Honda. At least there were. Two that I know of are the Ford Crown Vic. and the Ford Taurus. It's possible these are only available for fleet sales.

    Check out corbin motors for an interesting vehicle called the sparrow. It looks like there are TEN dealers in your area.

    Finally, being in San Fran. with only ~50 mile round trips, what prevents you from using mass transit?

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    1. Re:motorcycle or tiny diesel by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2

      An electric car is not an alternative fuel unless all of the power from your grid is via solar or wind (I don't count hydro, as this usually comes from a dam that disrupted local flora/fauna).

      Wind/solar farms are just as disruptive as hydro power. To get the generating capacity of something like Hoover Dam you need many large wind/solar installations, plus the eco impact of manufacturing tremendous amounts of related equipment. People often forget that wind/solar are pretty 'low density' energy sources.

    2. Re:motorcycle or tiny diesel by weave · · Score: 2
      An electric car is not an alternative fuel unless all of the power from your grid is via solar or wind

      A valid concern, although I do believe it's been shown that the emisions out of a tightly regulated electric generating plant emit less overall polutants than parking the power plant inside each vehicle, as in, it's possible to produce the energy cleaner by specializing and doing it in one location than having millions of little inefficient power plants running all over the place....

      However, in all of these analysis I've seen, the portion usually not considered is the production and later disposal of the batteries. I suspect that when that is factored in, the environmental benefits go down to zero or may even be worse... :(

    3. Re:motorcycle or tiny diesel by gmhowell · · Score: 2

      I'll admit that I did not know that. Let me ask a question: I've been to various places in the 'bread basket' of the US. Kansas, Nebraska, etc. Lots of wide open land. Are installations of solar farms in these areas as disruptive? Are they disruptive?

      I would imagine that large solar farms would almost always be disruptive (now that you mention it) because of blocking light getting to ground. I would further imagine that the local ecosystem requires that light to hit the ground.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    4. Re:motorcycle or tiny diesel by jafuser · · Score: 1
      I don't count hydro, as this usually comes from a dam that disrupted local flora/fauna

      [As Homer Simpson, sarcastically]

      Ooooh.. disrupt the local flooora and fauuuna? Oh, we wouldn't want to do that now would we!

      [Proceeds to do donuts in his 10gpm-guzzling Canynero, in a bright grassy meadow, as the wildlife disperses in a chaotic manner]

      All kidding aside, give me a break. I'm all for conservation, but if damming up a river as an alternative to burning oil, gas, or coal and filling the air with millions of tons of crap isn't considered an alternative (aka newable and clean) form of energy, then you need to take your flora and fauna with you to keep them safe on your next trip to fantasyland.

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    5. Re:motorcycle or tiny diesel by gmhowell · · Score: 2

      Not disagreeing, but let me stir the pot a little more. How tightly regulated are most electric power plants? If like most things, the answer is: very regulated, but only to the letter, not spirit, of the regulations. IOW, while there's lots of forms to fill out, it's easy to get around.

      And I had totally forgotten about the battery disposal problem. If I remember, that's one of the several reasons that GM stopped making the EV-1.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    6. Re:motorcycle or tiny diesel by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      A used GoldWing with a sidecar will set you back less than $20,000. It runs on regular fuel, and will likely get between 35-40 mpg.

      I can get 35mpg (combined city and highway) from my 1995 Toyota Tercel! Much cheaper, roomier, and safer too.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    7. Re:motorcycle or tiny diesel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention the many, many miles of transmission lines that would be required to transmit the electricity from the middle of nowhere to someplace where people might actually want to live. Don't forget that most of the population of the US, as well as most of the industry is located on the coasts.

    8. Re:motorcycle or tiny diesel by weave · · Score: 2
      Q: How tightly regulated are most electric power plants?

      A: As tightly regulated as the refineries that produce gasoline from crude oil. :-)

    9. Re:motorcycle or tiny diesel by gmhowell · · Score: 2

      Check out my latest journal article. I actually expand on this idea greatly and driving an older car is my preferred answer.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    10. Re:motorcycle or tiny diesel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My '94 Saturn SL:
      45 mpg (mostly highway).
      400 miles between fillups.
      $3500 (bluebook). Donate the other $16,500 to the EFF? :)
      Seats five (if one of them's really short).
      Actually has a fair-sized trunk.

      My only complaint: The bugger takes premium.

      I'd always wondered if motorcycles were more earth-friendly than their four-wheeled counterparts. If those are the best stats it can muster, I'll pass.

    11. Re:motorcycle or tiny diesel by kevinank · · Score: 2
      Finally, being in San Fran. with only ~50 mile round trips, what prevents you from using mass transit?

      The state of the mass transit system is what prevents most people from using it here in the bay area. Fifty miles is about the distance from Hayward to Palo Alto. Using mass transit you'd have to start on AC Transit or BART, then switch to VTA to cross the bay. Minimum time required is about an hour and a half each way if you catch the Express busses and if the express bus goes straight to your office. Add another 20 minutes if you have to switch bus lines again.

      Back a few years ago when the dotcom commuters were crowding all of the bridges the time was only about ten minutes more than driving (although the schedule for express busses is very inconvenient), but after all of the layoffs the difference is more like 40 minutes each way which is more than an hour that I wouldn't get to spend with my kid in the evening.

      Personally I do count hydro as clean; or at least it is as clean as solar array collection. Habitats get changed by anything you build; houses, farms, even solar fields. And since the hydro cycle is driven entirely by the sun on regions of water that would be exposed to sun anyway, hydro is one of the most compact, least intrusive forms of solar collection I can imagine. That said, I think hydro would have a much better reputation if there were more mitigation done to reverse some of its side effects such as the impact it can have on salmon migration.

      --
      LibBT: BitTorrent for C - small - fast - clean (Now Versio
    12. Re:motorcycle or tiny diesel by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      I live on the east coast. I was always under the impression that BART covered a much wider area. Learn something new every day.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    13. Re:motorcycle or tiny diesel by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      I actually expand on this idea greatly and driving an older car is my preferred answer.

      I certainly plan to drive the Tercel into the ground, to get the greatest benefit out of the envirmomental cost of its creation. It's creeping up on 130k miles, but it still runs well, has given me very few problems over the past 7 years (and I don't even put in that much effort on maintence).

      But I hope that it will be the last conventional gasoline internal-combustion car I own. When the Tercel gives up the ghost, I'll probably be looking for a used hybrid. (Though the TDI concept also sounds interesting and worth a look.)

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    14. Re:motorcycle or tiny diesel by j-beda · · Score: 2
      later disposal of the batteries.

      You don't dispose of the batteries, you recycle them. Lead-acid batteries are completely recycled these days - that's why you have to turn in your old one before they give you the new one or pay a hefty deposit.

      Similar for most other technologies.

    15. Re:motorcycle or tiny diesel by nathanm · · Score: 2
      I've been to various places in the 'bread basket' of the US. Kansas, Nebraska, etc. Lots of wide open land. Are installations of solar farms in these areas as disruptive? Are they disruptive?
      They can be disruptive. Especially if they're placed in the path of migratory birds (which is most of the midwest). The main issue with wind power is that there isn't always enough wind velocity to turn the turbines. It just isn't economically feasible for most places in the world. The US Dept of Energy has a pretty good FAQ on wind power.

      The best source of renewable energy I've heard about is the article on /. a couple months ago about using solar panels on the moon & using microwave to transmit it down here.
    16. Re:motorcycle or tiny diesel by djenb · · Score: 1

      > the Ford Crown Vic...possible these are only available for fleet sales.
      i was digging around for NGV info earlier this year and all things i found pointed to the Crown Victoria (fleet or personal) coming standard with a 4.6L V8 SEFI engine. Here is what ngv.org has to say and stats i have seen give it fuel economy equivalent to 23mpg highway. not bad for a big old landshark ;)

  20. Cross country by ELCarlsson · · Score: 1

    I would imagine that you might run into some problems if you try to drive cross country in a CNG car. In the big cities I'm sure that you wouldn't have too much of a problem finding the special gas stations but in you are running low on fuel in the middle of nowhere in the mid west it might be a challange.

  21. Prius by dattaway · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My mom had her Prius for a year and loves it. Recently, they took a trip to Minnesota and the cost for gas during the trip was insignificant. While highway driving consumes more fuel due to aerodynamics, I have often been able to get more than 80mpg through the city. If you trick the accelerator pedal, you can get it to run off batteries for several minutes before the engine starts charging and giving a boost.

    The only problem she had with the car so far was running over accident debris that slashed a rear tire. Other than that, its supposed to have an incredible warranty. Something like 10 years. Toyota knows this is an experimental car, so they want to know what kinds of problems we have. None so far.

    1. Re:Prius by ggrappone · · Score: 1

      I drive a Prius. I live in New Hampshire and have been through one winter with it. It was fine (although the gas mileage is lower in the winter, which is to be expected).

      I average around 50 miles to the gallon and fuel up once every two weeks (I drive a lot, however). I get about 500 miles out of each tank of gas.

    2. Re:Prius by SethJohnson · · Score: 1


      Glad to hear your mom's experience with the Prius is so positive. It is a very popular car. The dealers apparently have waiting lists for this model.

      One thing I wanted to point out about your post, though. The engine doesn't 'charge' per se. The batteries in the Prius are charged through 'regenerative braking'. So when you apply the breaks, the energy that would normally be absorbed in the brake-pad friction is actually absorbed by generators that create electricity and charge the battery.

      I'm impressed that you got 80mpg with it. That's cool!/blockquote
    3. Re:Prius by dattaway · · Score: 2

      The computer display shows how much energy the batteries get from braking. Not too much, as its measured in 0.5KWh. I can get a few of those stars each 5 minutes if I do a lot of braking. Judging by the energy stars that show up, I'd say the brakes give enough power to run the headlights. They need to work on that by adding some serious gearing to the generator so the brake pads aren't used as much when stopping.

      We have contests in our family to see who gets the best gas milage. Mom only gets around 45-50 mpg, dad gets around 60, and I routinely get 80 during a whole city trip, with 5 minute intervals reaching 100mpg (running entirely on batteries.) Needless to say, I often bring the car back with a n empty battery. :)

    4. Re:Prius by p3d0 · · Score: 2
      ...intervals reaching 100mpg (running entirely on batteries.)
      Entirely on batteries? Then where does the gas go?
      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    5. Re:Prius by j-beda · · Score: 2
      I am pretty certain that the batteries get charged when they are low, regardless of the status of the brake system. Otherwise, a two hour highway drive would leave you with dead batteries!

      As you drive the car, the gas motor does not start up until the charge on the batteries drop below some set point, and then the motor startus up.

    6. Re:Prius by dattaway · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately, the display's pretty bargraph shows the 5 minute intervals ranging from 0 to 100mpg, not infinite spikes from dividing by zero.

    7. Re:Prius by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 2

      The warranty is eight years or 100,000 miles on the new-technology hybrid-specific components, which is indeed "something like ten years". There's a more conventional warranty for the conventional parts of the car.

      I was really glad to have a long warranty on the battery, even though Toyota claims it's still going strong after a simulated 150,000 miles of bench testing. Might not have had the nerve to buy otherwise.

      The battery recharges when you coast, or from power diverted from the gas engine. It can't absorb all the current from a quick stop, so braking is a mix of mechanical and regenerative braking. The motor that drives the wheels is simply run in reverse as a generator.

      Oh, and the generator that charges the battery doubles as a starter motor. It takes the engine to full idle speed in a heartbeat.

      howstuffworks.com has some details about how the Prius coordinates one gas engine and two motor-generators in a continuously variable transmission. Check it out - it's a heartstoppingly elegant classic of engineering.

      Reasons not to buy a Prius:
      o needing to tow something
      o wanting a wide choice of tires (it takes specialty high-load low rolling resistance tires)
      o needing better than 12 1/2 seconds 0-60
      o living far from a dealer. Harry's Garage does not have a *chance* with this car.
      o needing high ground clearance. The Prius sits fairly low.
      o burning dirty gas. The fuel pump and fuel filter are inside the tank. Need a new fuel filter? Pull the gas tank. It's a side effect of the evaporation control: this car puts less unburned hydrocarbon in the air in a year than you did the last time you spilled gas on your lawn mower.

    8. Re:Prius by SethJohnson · · Score: 1


      Ha-ha. I like that contest.

      I did a little research and it is unclear to me now if the battery is entirely charged by braking.

      Like the Honda, the Toyota Prius captures kinetic energy under braking to recharge the battery and it shuts the gasoline engine down at stoplights - reducing engine idling reduces vehicle emissions.

      That's how I had understood the battery-charging process of the Prius. But in various documentation, I am seeing references to MG1 and MG2, one of which is used to charge the battery by drawing power from the gas motor. This doesn't make a lot of sense because the car is still using gasoline to make electricity.

      In any event, I think the Prius is a fantastic first-generation hybrid and it certainly sounds like your family is benefitting from it. It will be interesting to see how the new Accord compares to it.
    9. Re:Prius by Darnit · · Score: 1

      Actually when the batteries get to a certain SOC the engine will run to charge the batteries.

    10. Re:Prius by Dr.+Zowie · · Score: 2

      Actually, the engine does charge the battery. Regen braking does too -- that's
      MG2 (the one on the drive shaft). But if the
      battery is low, the engine will run even with
      the car stopped, driving MG1 (the one opposite
      the engine on the sun gear doohickey) to make
      electricity and charge the battery.

    11. Re:Prius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Actually, the gas motor starts up as soon as the car has reached a threshold in speed. The electric motor is used just to get the car moving and keeps propelling the car as long as you're driving at low speeds. If you are driving on the highway at normal highway speeds, the gas engine is on the whole time. When you really mash on the gas, though, the electric motor will come on to assist with extra power.

  22. Try the Civic Hybrid by gadwhite · · Score: 1

    Honda has a Civic Hybrid (new for 2003). This gives you more room and is more comfortable than the Prius

  23. Bumper Stickers by mgarraha · · Score: 5, Funny
    Seen on an electric car in Michigan:
    MY OTHER CAR BURNS FOREIGN OIL
    1. Re:Bumper Stickers by Xaoswolf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The local theatre group here did a skit like the commercials about not doing drugs where people would come up on the stage, the focused a spotlight on them and say things like
      "I support a foreign terrorist regieme, but what do I care, I like driving my SUV"
      In the end, they gave a message about buying foreign oil.

    2. Re:Bumper Stickers by M-G · · Score: 2

      yeah...you've gotta watch out for that terrorist regime of Canada...since they're our largest supplier of imported oil...

    3. Re:Bumper Stickers by PatientZero · · Score: 2

      Oh sure, blame Canada!

      --
      Freedom to fear. Freedom from thought. Freedom to kill.
      I guess the War on Terror really is about freedom!
    4. Re:Bumper Stickers by MJovodji21 · · Score: 1

      It's not the car's fault for burning the foreign oil you put in it, it's our fault (as a country) for relying so heavily on foreign oil in the first place.

      I heard there's some up in Alaska though, hmmm...

    5. Re:Bumper Stickers by xinu · · Score: 1

      I've heard the same thing about offshore drilling and Alaska and what not. What I haven't seen is proof.

    6. Re:Bumper Stickers by slim · · Score: 2

      MY OTHER CAR BURNS FOREIGN OIL ... whereas the electric car runs on a combination of foreign oil and nuclear power (unless perhaps you have your own windfarm)

    7. Re:Bumper Stickers by M-G · · Score: 2

      When looking at only crude oil, Saudi Arabia is our biggest single supplier. However, once you add in gas and refined products, Canada blows everyone out of the water.

      Take a look at this PDF of oil and oil product imports to the US for 2001.

      The original post suggested that all oil money goes to support terrorist regimes. Look over those import numbers and you'll see that while we do import a great deal of petroleum products from Arab countries (which tarring Arab nations as terrorist is pretty racist anyway), there's a lot more coming to us from places like Venezuela, Canada, Mexico, etc.

      As for offshore drilling and Alaska...while the technology of searching for oil has improved tremendously, we still can't tell exactly how much is there and how much we'll get out until we poke a hole in the ground. That's why the statements against drilling in ANWR saying "there's only x months worth of supply there" are so misleading.

      I'm really suprised that the oil companies haven't waged a PR campaign for the image of oil wells. Everyone apparently has images in their mind of the old oil rush days in Texas and Oklahoma, where big black geysers shot into the sky for days. It simply isn't like that anymore. Look at the current wells in Alaska. Look at the gas production wells in the Gulf near Mobile. They're all among the cleanest facilities you can find.

  24. How does a Honda die? by gelfling · · Score: 3, Informative

    What did you do drive it into the Pacific? I leased 3 of them and they were Russian Trucks. Indestructible.

    At any rate the Civic HX is a gas only and gets about 80-85% of the mileage of the Civic electric hybrid. The insight is more of a concept car - only two seats no back at all no storage really. The Prius is an Echo with a different powerplant to give you a sense of the bigger size.

    Toyota is supposed to be delivering a hybrid next year if I remember correctly. Probably based on a Corolla floorpan.

    1. Re:How does a Honda die? by Ellen+Spertus · · Score: 1

      The transmission needs replacing. The car is 16 years old (1986 Honda Civic), so I have no complaints. The cost of replacing the transmission would be more than the car is worth.

    2. Re:How does a Honda die? by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 2

      The Prius is an Echo with a different powerplant to give you a sense of the bigger size.

      There are more differences then just the engine.

      The Prius is like an Echo, but with much better sound insulation and better shocks. Riding in an Echo is loud and bumpy. The Prius is quiet and smooth. Acceleration in an economy Echo can be pretty slow (But I've never tried a "Turbo Echo" if there is one). The Prius accelerates great (not a sports car, but I can get from 0 - 65 quickly enough to merge with aggressive Bay Area traffic).

      My brother-in-law & his wife have driven a Prius for about a year now. I've probably spent a good hundred hours in that car, as a driver & a passenger. I've also rented an Echo over a couple of weekends.

      The cars may looks similar, but the Prius is much more comfortable then an Echo.

      I would never buy an Echo. I am considering a Prius.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    3. Re:How does a Honda die? by Creepy · · Score: 1

      Interesting - 1986 Civics were notorious for blowing head gaskets. Mine did twice before I scrapped it. Apparently that was the year they switched to aluminum heads. Incidentally, I never had problems with the transmission, which was replaced twice in the '79 Tercel I had before that car (used, but well cared for by Mom). Both were manual transmissions, fyi.

      My mom has an '88 Civic and it finally died this year (the battery won't keep a charge, even with a new battery and alternator). It *only* had 248000 miles on it (my '86 only got 112000, and yes, I changed the oil every 3K -- I don't think the original owner did, tho, which probably contributed to the first head gasket going at 65000).

      The Toyota Tercel lasted the longest, though - 320000+ miles (it was at 300k when I gave it to my brother and he drove it for 2 more years...).

    4. Re:How does a Honda die? by UranusReallyHertz · · Score: 1

      Yep, Toyotas are mile buckets. I know someone who has a toyota pickup with 311,000 miles, and he says the thing still runs fine.

      --
      Smoking is an expensive, slow, and unreliable method of suicide.
    5. Re:How does a Honda die? by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      The Prius is an Echo with a different powerplant to give you a sense of the bigger size.

      Toyota is supposed to be delivering a hybrid next year if I remember correctly.


      The Toyota Prius *IS* a hybrid.

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    6. Re:How does a Honda die? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like it lives... like a chintzy, under powered, punk ass bitch.....

    7. Re:How does a Honda die? by IanO · · Score: 2

      Actually the Echo is considerably faster. It takes around 9 seconds to get to 60mph and about 17 seconds to get through the 1/4 mile (both fairly standard straight line performance measures).

      The Prius takes between 14 and 20 seconds to reach 60mph (the more charged the battery the quicker the car) and 20-23 seconds to do the 1/4 mile. In the 1/4 mile (ie. an onramp) the Echo would be at least 5 or 6 car lengths ahead.

      I've driven in both and neither is my kind of car but if I had to choose I'd probably take the Prius although I find them both pretty skimpy on cargo space. And either one would stink if you have to do much driving on 2 lane highways... no possibility of passing.

      --
      ------
      Objects in Mirror are Losing!
    8. Re:How does a Honda die? by gelfling · · Score: 2

      My 78 Corolla had 150K before it got hit by a truck and totalled. All the windows blew out, crushed the rear end broke damn near everything. Drove it home - about a half mile with everything leaking.

    9. Re:How does a Honda die? by gelfling · · Score: 2

      Yes the Corolla based unit is the next evolutionary step - bigger more mainstream, less of a 'world' car.

  25. a couplet of ideas by Pauly · · Score: 5, Interesting

    First, the Corbin Sparrow really seems to taking hold in places like Los Angeles and to a lessor degree Atlanta.

    However, the lowest emissions vehicle around is a bicycle. I mean this in all seriousness. The Bay area has a uniquely nice bicycling climate, and since you already have one car, you don't have to give up the occasional hauling-of-big-stuff cars are good at. And don't underestimate the health benefits of such daily exercise. I love it since you don't have to take extra time out of your day just to go to the gym.

    In the Bay Area, there's even a service to shuttle bicycles over the Bay bridge for $1.

    1. Re:a couplet of ideas by Walrus99 · · Score: 1

      Plus you can show off the cute butt you get from biking every day by wearing your tight bike shorts at work. The secretaries will love it.

    2. Re:a couplet of ideas by kirkjobsluder · · Score: 1

      And another option to extend range and for more fun is an electric bicycle. (And for another site Electric Bikes Northwest). The battery is used to provide an extra bost on hills or at stop lights while carying heavy loads.

    3. Re:a couplet of ideas by Eightlines · · Score: 1

      I contacted this manufacturer about its cars, but got a bit of a runaround:

      They seem to convert pre-existing cars to electric engines. In their first car, the Dauphine Electric was first created in the 1960s with an Electric Option pack. This makes it ideal for putting new and more efficient batteries in the machine.

      Not sure about the new car they're sporting on their website, the Zenn. This is the first time I've visited their website in a couple months.

      As for the running around I got, I called them and went to visit their garage but there were no cars there. Turns out they cancelled my appointment after I had already left for the garage because they were getting the cars Road Tested in Windsor, ON for the Canadian Standards. I do know they exist because I've seen them around town a couple times. Hopefully it'll catch on soon.

    4. Re:a couplet of ideas by vanyel · · Score: 2

      I loved my sparrow...when it was working. A number of them have had short-lived belts --- it's a belt drive and not field replaceable. It's not hard to replace, but does require taking apart the drive train. There have been a number of other problems, and indications of problems at Corbin that make this an unwise choice. And I really wanted to take passengers along also...

    5. Re:a couplet of ideas by npsimons · · Score: 2
      However, the lowest emissions vehicle around is a bicycle.

      Damn skippy! I was going to mention this, but I didn't want to sound like a prick. I own a bicycle and a Toyota 4Runner. What do I use the bicycle for? Riding to and from work in 100+ F degree weather, of course! And I am doing better by the environment than anyone else who isn't also riding a bicycle to work everyday.

      So, you might ask, what do I need the 4Runner for? For three major things:

      1. Long highway trips
      2. Hauling stuff
      3. Off-roading/4 wheeling
      And yes, I actually do off-road and use 4 wheel drive. For those that don't believe me, consider this: I bought the Toyota 4Runner to replace a Ford Ranger because I kept getting it stuck and snapping the clutch. I once had to walk back 20 miles! Not that it wasn't an enjoyable hike, it was just a little inconvenient at the time.

      So until you start riding a bicycle to work everyday, you can take your "you shouldn't own an SUV, they're evil!" BS and shove it up your ass!

    6. Re:a couplet of ideas by Speed+Racer · · Score: 1

      Since I do ride a bicycle to work everyday, does that mean I can tell you "you shouldn't own an SUV, they're evil!"

      Of course, I wouldn't tell you that because an SUV is much more friendly to the environment than, say, a 1989 Chevrolet Sprint and I think the internal combustion engine is one of the greatest acheivements of mankind.

      --
      Free Mac Mini. Yes, I'm
    7. Re:a couplet of ideas by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      Hrm... I haven't seen a Sparrow in Atlanta. But I now have an enviable 4 mile commute, none of it on the freeways.

      Bicycling in Atlanta, however, is a death wish. I used to bike a lot as a kid, but back then the area wasn't as heavily populated and traffic wasn't nearly so bad. Atlanta has virtually no bike paths along major roads. Heck, we don't even have sidewalks in a lot of areas. That 4 mile commute would get me killed on a bike. Quickly. And the only alternative route I have would be something like 20-30 miles in length. With equally heavy (or heavier) traffic.

    8. Re:a couplet of ideas by Ian+Bicking · · Score: 2

      Sadly, electric vehicles don't work in northern climates, but a little vehicle like the Sparrow would be nice for city driving, where most vehicles seem excessive. The Smart seems a lot like this -- sadly not available in the US. At 58mpg, it's pretty efficient without (AFAIK) using an unconventional engine (it's just very small). Size is probably the biggest energy-saving attribute of the Sparrow as well (moreso than fuel type).

    9. Re:a couplet of ideas by Betaman · · Score: 1

      However, the lowest emissions vehicle around is a bicycle.

      I don't want to be captain obvious, but in Michigan you simply cannot ride your bike to work because (A) the weatherpeople are rarely even close to correct about what tomorrow's weather will be like and (B) Snow, hail, heavy rain, ice, etc. I know many people who tried biking to work every day and most stopped because every other week at least they would end up biking home in heavy rain, plus some people live at least a half-hour away in a car-- talk about cutting down on family time if you took your bike instead. Suits, presentation materials, laptops can be troublesome as well. For a lot of people biking is not the solution.

    10. Re:a couplet of ideas by Pauly · · Score: 2
      As both a (former) meteorologist and a (practicing) bicyclist, I admit your points have merit. However, seeing that a very good, new bicycle can be purchased and maintained for less money than the average set of auto tires, why not give it a try? There are many nice weather days (even in Michigan), you don't always need to wear a suit, carry a presentation or laptop.

      As for the 30 minute commute, maybe the most ecologically friendly thing you could do is live closer to where you work (or vice-versa)? Or best of all: telecommute!

    11. Re:a couplet of ideas by RayChuang · · Score: 2

      While bicycling is great if you have a lot of flat land (like in the South Bay), you can forget about bicycling on the hills of the Bay Area unless your bicycle's derailleur is in really good condition or you have one of these new bikes with auto-shifting gear systems.

      If someone comes up with a folding bicycle with an auto-shifting derailleur I'll buy one in a New York minute! Unlike regular bikes folding bikes allow you to travel most transit systems without limitations (e.g., BART limiting bicycle stowage on their trains between Oakland and San Francisco during rush hours).

      --
      Raymond in Mountain View, CA
    12. Re:a couplet of ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not get a velomobile, sure they're alot more expensive than a regular bike but they protect you from the elements and improve visibility and provide some crash protection.

      A common velomobile is the Leitra (review at recumbents.com/mars/pages/lib/libleitra.html).

      Or for real flash try the go-one (http://www.go-one.biz/ukindex.shtml)

  26. Still delighted with my Prius by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 3, Insightful

    After a year of driving it (on the rare occasions when I can get it away from my wife) it's still an utterly satisfying car, with super-ultra-low emissions (SULEV) and high gas milesage as icing on the cake.

    Society of Automotive Engineers voted it best engineered car of 2001. I think it's the car Dilbert would drive.

    The Honda Civic hybrid is the most direct competition. The Prius transmission is more elegant and *may* last longer, and the availability of pure-electric drive means the engine never needs to do destructive low-speed operation once it's warmed up. You may prefer the feel of the brakes on the Civic, and in ten years I bet it's easier to find Civic parts than Prius parts.

    1. Re:Still delighted with my Prius by Knobby · · Score: 2

      You may prefer the feel of the brakes on the Civic, and in ten years I bet it's easier to find Civic parts than Prius parts.

      I drove a friend's Prius recently. I was rather disappointed. It felt like I was dragging an anchor.. That's a little off-topic though. What I wanted to mention was that it's very difficult to find a Prius in comparison to the Hybrid Civic. This is partially due to the choices made by the Honda engineers. By sticking with the Civic chassis and body work they don't need to do anything fancy with the production lines. That means cheaper, more readily available hybrids from Honda than Toyota. .. And as you mentioned, it probably means that parts will be easier to find for the hybrid Civics ten years from now..

  27. Ford Think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A friend of mine just saw a Ford Think in LA the other night. Looks like something you should consider with those others.

    P

  28. Ebay! by chill · · Score: 2

    Check out the auto part of Ebay. Just last month I saw a CNG converted 2000 Ford Aerostar with 10,000 miles sell for $6,500. Sale was in California.

    Just make sure you can get CNG where you are going. Other than that, BioDiesel is a good alternative.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  29. Alternate Fuel by Kalkin · · Score: 1

    http://www.acpropulsion.com/

    Alternate Fuel (especially for cars) is dominated by the industries that already sell the "regular" mode of .

    Let's say there ARE grants available to research new technologies...who do you think picks them up? Who hires more lobbyists? Who buys/gets more time at alternate fuel seminars?

    This all sounds like a 'no-duh' scenario, and this isn't another argument for open source, but grants by the government need to belong to the public. In addition, those grants need to be publicly accountable - no, we don't want you dusting off research done during the 70's oil crisis, and suggesting that the grant paid for that.

  30. VW TDIs by Kowgod · · Score: 1

    I recommend you look into VW's TDI engine powered cars. The turbo diesel Golfs and Jettas get 40 - 50+ miles per gallon, have more than enough power to maintain 100+ mile per hour speeds on the highway, have loads of torque to keep that 0-60 time below a minute ;) and are damn nice cars, amenities and luxury wise.

    Plus, they are very reasonably priced, considering the fuel savings.

    Take a look, you'll be surprised how many misconceptions you had about diesels once you ride in one.

    --
    -- Mesmer is the Dairy King Remove your panties to email me.
    1. Re:VW TDIs by Kowgod · · Score: 1

      Ahhh, I just realized you live in California. Diesel cars MIGHT be illegal in California. I can't remember for sure, and am too lazy to look...

      If so, so much for the VW TDI route. Sorry.

      --
      -- Mesmer is the Dairy King Remove your panties to email me.
    2. Re:VW TDIs by stungod · · Score: 2

      I totally agree. I had a Jetta TDi for a couple of years (sold it for the D/P on a house...dammit) and it was amazing. I would routinely get >50 MPG on the highway...that's a 700-mile range. Try that with a hybrid!

      And with the new diesel combustion technology, it really is a pretty clean car as well. It's definitely worth a look for somebody who wants to burn less fuel and support the terrorists less. (yes, that was a troll...kind of.)

      For some really good, geek-level info about the TDi cars, go to the TDI Club.

    3. Re:VW TDIs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Diesel cars are not illegal in California, and in fact are exempt from the smog check in that state. However, the California Air Resources Board -- staffed with politicians who are often ignorant about choices that truly help the environment (such as these greenhouse gas-slashing diesels) -- has leaned on Volkswagen to ration the number of diesels it sells in California. The result is that they sell over sticker price when you can get one.

      I got around this by purchasing a used, low-miles TDI Beetle from Florida. The car gets better mileage than the Prius or Insight, stayed at above 70 all the way from San Francisco to Seattle on a recent trip (I did turn off A/C going up some passes to be kind to the car), and still returned 46 mpg. And, while a new Mini it ain't, it's still worlds more stylish than any of the alternatives.

      It's nice to see VW of America advertising these cars again. I predict that the prejudice against diesels (who cares if GM made junky diesels decades ago .. ALL their cars are junk) will die off as the herd-like, SUV-driving baby boomers fade into the sunset. It needs to, because there's no more efficient energy choice, and we're not going to be able to get along without them.

    4. Re:VW TDIs by bofkentucky · · Score: 1

      How can they outlaw diesel, unless those 18-wheelers you see run on fairy dust, diesel can't be outlawed for a very long time.

      --
      09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0
    5. Re:VW TDIs by Kowgod · · Score: 1

      I didn't say ALL diesels, I said diesel cars. And before I continue, I'm not even sure if I'm right or not. But if I'm not mistaken, passenger cars in California either have to run on gasoline or bio-diesel.

      Since my original post, I have read that VW TDI's can run on bio-diesel. But I'm not sure if all model years, or just 2002s are included.

      --
      -- Mesmer is the Dairy King Remove your panties to email me.
    6. Re:VW TDIs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All TDI's can run on Biodiesel in any percentage you want. B20 (20% biodiesel, 80% dino diesel) is typical but there are quite a few TDI owners running B100 (100% biodiesel). There are many benefits to biodiesel and very few negatives. It can be made from many sources including "virgin" soy bean oil or recycled vegtable oil. You can even make it yourself!

      Check out -
      http://www.tdiclub.com/ for info about the TDI

      http://www.biodieselnow.com/ for grass roots efforts in bringing Biodiesel to retail markets in various parts of the US.

      http://www.veggievan.com/ for more biodiesel information.

      If you want to read about making your own Biodiesel, Joshua Tickle's book "From the Fryer to the Fuel Tank" is the bible...

      Additionally, many Arco stations in California are starting to the the Ultra Low Sulpher diesel fuel ( 50 parts per million) that all of the US will have to have by 2006.

      And no, diesel cars are NOT illegal in CA.

      - a proud TDI owner wishing, I could have bought one of the also excellent Daimler-Chrysler "CDI" common rail diesel engines in my Dodge Caravan!

  31. I'd agree hybrid is the way to go by Trepidity · · Score: 2

    Also, the new Civic Hybrid is a full five-passenger hybrid sedan, which really means that there's no reason anyone (who doesn't need a minivan) can't get a hybrid vehicles these days. The Prius and Insight, due to their smaller size, get better mileage, but at 45 mpg city and 50 mpg highway the Civic isn't bad either.

    1. Re:I'd agree hybrid is the way to go by M-G · · Score: 2

      which really means that there's no reason anyone (who doesn't need a minivan) can't get a hybrid vehicles these days.

      Yes, hybrids such as the Civic do provide the same amount of room as a standard Civic. But if you stuff 5 people into one, you're going to hear complaints. Until these systems mature further, they're be limited to the smallest of boxes. For bigger vehicles, technology like Ford's hydraulic accumulator system are going to be the way to go.

      Now, you can show the world how environmentally friendly you are by driving your hybrid Civic, but let's look at the facts: you have to spend a premium of about $3500 for the hybrid over a similarly equipped LX. All so you can get about 48 MPG vs. 38. You're only going to save about $100 to $200 per year on gas if you drive 12,000 miles per year, and that's only if you drive it very gently to maximize fuel economy.

      Buy a diesel Volkswagen instead, enjoy better fuel economy, more power, and you don't need special compound tires.

    2. Re:I'd agree hybrid is the way to go by ChannelX · · Score: 1

      Who only drives 12k miles a year? That is a *very* conservative value.

      --
      My blog: http://jkratz.dyndns.org/~jason/blog/
    3. Re:I'd agree hybrid is the way to go by anactofgod · · Score: 1
      Errr...let's assume that your facts are right, and just check the math.

      Doing dimensional analysis, with an criminally optimistic fuel price of $1/gallon...

      12,000mi/year / (48 - 38)mi/gallon * $1/gallon = $1,200/yr

      So, at $1/gallon, one'd would been reaping dividends on the initial premim of the engine ($3500) by the end of Year 3. At what *I* pay in the DC area ($1.40 minimum for 87 octane if I'm lucky), I'd be ahead of the game by the end of Y2/start of Y3.

      A hybrid might not offer the performance/features bang-for-the-buck, but not for the math argument you posed.

      Personally, I'd be happy with just my Buell, and a Suburu WRX STi for "urban rally racing". *grynn*

      ...anactofgod...

      --

      ---anactofgod---

      "Equal opportunity swindling - *that* is the true test of a sustainable democracy."
    4. Re:I'd agree hybrid is the way to go by haahr · · Score: 1

      Unlike the two-seater Insight, the Prius is a five-passenger sedan. In this case, it's Honda catching up to Toyota: the new Civic is only a tad larger than the Prius.

    5. Re:I'd agree hybrid is the way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is there some tax breaks for buying hyrid cars now???

    6. Re:I'd agree hybrid is the way to go by patchmaster · · Score: 1

      You formula is incorrect. Your $1200/yr savings, at $1/gallon, says you're saving 1200 gallons a year. But at 38 MPG, you only use 316 gallons to go 12,000 miles. Did you get that formula the same place Jack got his beans?

      At 38 MPG you'll use 316 gallons to go 12,000 miles. At 48 MPG you'll use 250 gallons to go 12,000 miles. That's a savings of 66 gallons a year. At $2/gallon, you'll have paid off that initial price differential in 26.5 years.

      If, OTOH, you invested the $3500 at 4% simple interest, you'd earn more than enough to pay for the extra gas, and you'd still have $3500 as a downpayment on your next car.

    7. Re:I'd agree hybrid is the way to go by M-G · · Score: 2

      2,000mi/year / (48 - 38)mi/gallon * $1/gallon = $1,200/yr

      What you've just done is calculate the cost of running a car that that gets 10 miles per gallon. You need to do:

      12000 * (1/48 - 1/38) * $1

    8. Re:I'd agree hybrid is the way to go by M-G · · Score: 2

      Ok...argue it with the US DOT

      And that's the table for all vehicles. When it's viewed as passenger cars, it's even less.

  32. VW diesel engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    have you looked into diesel engines? they get very high mpg and will go well over the 65mph limit

    its not electric but you might wanna have a look at them

  33. Must be a lot of us thinking about this by cDarwin · · Score: 1
    How about a used ev1? Since you like the car, you might try finding a used one.

    I'm gearing up to convert an gasoline powered car to run on ethanol. I plan to make my own fuel, too. But that might be more of a project than you're up for.

    You might also consider leasing something for a few years until the first crop of fuel cell vehicles becomes available. Things are moving very quickly now. Peugeot may have something ready for market by 2005.

    --

    --
    Socrates was asked where he was from. He replied not "Athens," but "The world."

    1. Re:Must be a lot of us thinking about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GM never sold the EV1, they only leased them. Can't buy them used.

    2. Re:Must be a lot of us thinking about this by cDarwin · · Score: 1

      Dang! I didn't know that.

      --

      --
      Socrates was asked where he was from. He replied not "Athens," but "The world."

  34. No, you be the grease spot this time... by paiute · · Score: 1

    I'd drive one of them tiny cars - on a closed course, or maybe a big parking lot. On the expressway though, I want some mass on my side. I don't want to be a speedbump for some retard in a Ford Behemoth. So you drive the nice little car - I'll be in the minivan.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    1. Re:No, you be the grease spot this time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then I'll get a dumptruck... and you'll get a tractor trailer and we'll keep escalating the size because we are both afraid... No thanks, I prefer to be brave and help future generations live on a cleaner safer planet rather than live my life in fear because my transport pod is too small.

  35. My Honda Insight by cagolfer · · Score: 1

    I have had a honda insight for about 4 months, gets great gas mileage ~65 mpg driving 100 miles per day in the Bay Area. The street noise is a little worse than most cars but it really isn't that bad. It's great getting close to 700 miles on one 10 gallon tank of gas. Saves lots of money.

  36. New VW Diesel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A new VW Beetle Diesel running on biodiesel would be very enviro friendly. There are bio diesel pumps in San Fran and the new diesels are cleaner burning and warrentied for use with biodiesel.

  37. other ideas by dmcmaine · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've done a bit of research in my quest to find my next car and here's what I found:
    -The current hybrid vehicles, IMO, offer a false ecomony due to their higher sticker price and uncertain disposal/replacement cost for the batteries +/- 8 years down the road.
    -Looking at the Honda lineup it would make more sense economically to purchase the Civic HX Coupe or any other of the other non-hybrid Civics (or 4 cylinder Accords for that matter).
    -Take a look at Intellichoice.com and fueleconomy.gov and do some calculations to determine the real, long term cost of a number of other vehicles (Ford Focus, Honda, Toyota, Saturn, etc)and see how it stacks up to the hybrids.
    -The one caveat is that you need to know what happens what it is time to replace the batteries on a hybrid car.
    -Lastly, check local rebates for buying a hybrid vehicle in your area, that might make up the initial cost difference in buying a hybrid vehicle.
    Good luck!

  38. Prius by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    My sister's car went to that great front yard in the sky after receiving enough damage for the insurace company to total it. She's had a Prius for a couple months and loves it. She lives in Grand Rapids, MI, so winter may be another matter (how well battery operation works in extreme cold) so far she's only having to put gas in about every three weeks (i'm pretty jealous, my Dakota needs feeding at least once a week, I live in the Santa Cruz area and know well the price of gas of which the author writes) and she figures a trip across the state, to Midland, once in a while into that. Pretty impressive.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  39. Why Electric? by stuffman64 · · Score: 2

    Many people who drive electric vehicles do so because they believe that since they are zero-emission, they do not pollute. However, that is not the case. Remember, the power company that supplies your power to charge the car most likey does so by consuming natural resources (coal, oil, natural gas) or using nuclear power (which has concerns of its own). In fact, you may actually end up polluting more that a convensional vehicle. While the Insight, Prius, and Civic Hybrid are quite nice, I would recomment the Nissan Sentra CA. It is PZLEV (partial zero-emissions vehicle) and is the only SULEV vehicle on the road. The only caveat is that it is only sold in California. Nissan claims that this car pollutes less driving 20 miles than a regular car just sitting in the garage. Definately worth checking out.

    --
    --- At my sig, unleash hell.
    1. Re:Why Electric? by ArcticChicken · · Score: 1

      I think a single power plant supplying an entire city's worth of vehicles is going to be more cost-effective at controlling and minimizing pollution levels than an entire city filled with independently managed internal combustion engines.

      Look at that run-on sentence! Woohoo! Time for more beer! ;-)

    2. Re:Why Electric? by ktulu1115 · · Score: 1
      Nissan claims that this car pollutes less driving 20 miles than a regular car just sitting in the garage
      Call me skeptical but how does a car pollute at all sitting in a garage? Not meant to troll or anything but I honestly don't understand.
      --
      # fuser -v /dev/attention | grep work
      #
    3. Re:Why Electric? by twnth · · Score: 1
      This link [enmax.com] is an example of how this is becoming less true, at least in my area.

      i believe, however that demand is exceeding production, even though we pay a premium for 'green power'. but its a fee i'm willing to pay.

    4. Re:Why Electric? by stuffman64 · · Score: 2

      When a car is turned off, a small amount of unburned fuel is left inside the engine. Because one or more valves may be open, hot gasoline vapors may escape either through the intake manifold and eventually out of the engine, or throught the exaust manifold where the catalytic converter does nothing, because it only reacts with the byproducts of combustion. Other factors, including soot in the exaust cause pollution also.

      --
      --- At my sig, unleash hell.
    5. Re:Why Electric? by SerialHistorian · · Score: 1

      You are incorrect that the Sentra CA is the only SULEV vehicle on the road. Honda Accord EX-L's and all hybrids are registered as SULEV in California, and indeed, the air coming out of the tailpipe of an Accord EX-L is cleaner than the air going in the intake.

      --

      --
      Vote for your hopes, not for your fears - Vote Third Party

    6. Re:Why Electric? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is all fine and dandy for them to claim that their care is that efficent, but where is the actual information as to how they do it. I couldn't find anything on their site about why the car is so clean.

    7. Re:Why Electric? by Darnit · · Score: 1

      The day the car drives off the lot the car is clean. How about 5 years down the road. The car is now not perfectly tuned and pollutes more. The power plant though is still adhereing to the regulations set by the govt. Those regulations may have gotten stricter and the power plant may very well be cleaner 5 years from when you bought your car.

      An electric will 99% of the time be cleaner than a gasoline burning car (even SULEV).

    8. Re:Why Electric? by Zueski · · Score: 1

      The big thing about letting the power company do your emissions for you is they can do it far more efficiently than you could ever with a power plant that has to move. The power companies live by how many miles per gallon they can get, so to speak.

      --
      please don't feed the monkey
    9. Re:Why Electric? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My electric car doesn't run on coal, oil, gas, OR nuclear. I live in the Pacific Northwest, so my electric car runs on dead fish!

      Wahoo I'm progressive!

    10. Re:Why Electric? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sentra CA is not the only SULEV, but it is the
      only PZEV (partial Zero.. in California) which
      means SULEV + zero evap (no outgassing in your
      garage) + 150k warranty on emissions.

      And as for pollution from power plants for EVs,
      the upstream pollution for your IC (internal combustion)
      is much worse... drilling, transporting, refining,
      transporting again, refueling (evap)..

      So, even if your ICE had NO TAILPIPE, it would
      still be more polluting than an EV.. at least
      here in California where the electricity is
      fairly clean.

  40. Alternative Fuel Transportation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simple.... get a horse.

  41. Jetta TDI has better mileage by Coolfish · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Jetta TDI has better mileage than the Civic hybrid.. in fact i believe it has the best mileage for any vehicle that still uses a fossil fuel of any sort.

    http://www.vw.com/engine/index.htm?locnav=jetta

  42. Expensive Flower Vase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you actually feel safe in these little contraptions? Ride on hippies...

  43. I pine for the T-Zero by Byteme · · Score: 1
    1. Re:I pine for the T-Zero by Mouth+of+Sauron · · Score: 1

      Please mod the above message up. The T-Zero by AC Propulsion is the first electric vehicle that actually competes with gasoline automobiles in terms of performance. In fact, this vehicle has amazing performance. It goes from 0 to 60 is 4.1 seconds, which is faster than some motorcycles to say nothing of cars. It runs the quarter mile in 13 seconds, and has a range of 100 miles if you stay under the speed limit. By not attempting to be a hybrid, this vehicle can do away with all the extra weight of a conbustion power plant. And best of all it can be plugged into a regular house outlet. Still, the down side is the price and the battery pack. It only has a life of about three years, and then you have to purchase a new one for about $3,000. The end price is similar to a new Porsche since these are not made on an assembly line. Except for the price, this is it.

  44. Too bad.. by docbrown42 · · Score: 1

    ...you cant run a car on the "Slashdot effect". If you could, all you'd have to do is post a link to your car to refuel!

    -Ed

    docbrown.net
    Graphic Design, Web Design, Role-Playing Games...all the good stuff

    --
    Ed Wedig
    Graphic design services
    docbrown.net
  45. Car pool access by jchristopher · · Score: 3, Informative
    As you noted, single drivers in dedicated natural gas vehicles (NGVs)can use the carpool lanes in California. This is a HUGE perk and not to be overlooked.

    At last check, this benefit was not available to hybrid electric vehicles. Especially in a large metro area like San Francisco or Los Angeles this perk alone can pay for itself.

    The California Air Resources board provides a list of vehicles eligible for the carpool lane perk - choose carefully because not all alternative fuel vehicles are eligible!

    A good resource to learn more is NGV.ORG (I've linked to google's cache... this is a small box, please don't hammer our server.) which provides a list of cofunding opportunities available for natural gas vehicle owners, including tax breaks and rebates from the state of California.

    Good luck in your search!

    1. Re:Car pool access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      What about a CNG hybrid electric car?

      Best of both worlds (LPG for European markets)

      Both are really easy to do for standard stationary gasoline engines - no wildly varying input loads, etc.

      "Stationary", because these engines run at constant speed, unlike direct road drive engines. Train locomotive engines are classified as stationary engines too.

      FWIW, most of the wizardry we see in car engines is to cope with varying speeds - the chamges in speed create wildly varying thermodynamic conditions inside the engine, which primarily come down to the point that no matter host fast it spins, the flame front still advances at pretty much the same speed.

      So one of the constantly unspoken advantages of engines in hybrids is that the engines are simpler in design, simpler to maintain and subject to far lower loadings than direct drive engines, so they last a _lot_ longer.

      The average japanese car is built to last 8 years (that's when parts stop being made by the makers). I wouldn't be at all surprised to find that hybrids last more like 20.

      Even battery issues are less of a worry with a hybrid as deep cycling doesn't happen, so the battery system is treated far better than something whcih needs to be plugged in - when they need charging, they get charged immediately and a smart setup does just that.

      Yes, the hybrids are currently getting poorer milage than the top end cars. That will change. This is the first generation of japanese consumer hybrid cars (as oopposed to experimental vehicles) and things can only get better.

      Who knows? Perhaps the next generations will have turbodiesels as the powerplant?

      Stationary turbodiesels are _incredibly_ efficient. US diesel will have to be majorly cleaned up though, so this may be a europe-only option.

      Toyota's posted plans for prius/echo a few years ago said that the bodyshell is designed for the engine to be eventually entirely replaced by fuel cells.

      Remember: Honda and Toyota didn't even let these out of Japan for the first 3 years of operation. These are out of prototype stage and into real world development. Let's hope it works well.

  46. Biodiesel by otis+wildflower · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Hi,
    Hybrids really don't count IMHO as 'alternative fuel' vehicles, since they use two fuels that are exceedingly ordinary: gasoline and electricity. They should qualify for partial EV credit, and they're great for reducing fuel consumption, but without E85 they just aren't 'alternative fuel'.

    I would recommend a late-model Volkswagen diesel and biodiesel as a true 'alternative fuel' vehicle. Diesels are more efficient, create less CO2 and other greenhouse gases, and last FOREVER. I just recently purchased a Mercedes diesel with 362000 miles on it, and I expect to get at least another 130000 miles on it with proper care and feeding. My car can't take 100% biodiesel without some fuel-line upgrades (bio eats rubber away since it's more oxygenated than petro) but any diesel since 1994 can take 100%. Another option, particularly in colder climes or with older cars, is B20, which is 20%bio/80%petro. Biodiesel doesn't contain sulfur, and is naturally oxygenated enough to prevent smelly particulate exhaust. In fact, tailpipe exhaust smells like french fries ;) Biodiesel is actually technically non-toxic and very hard to burn, and IIRC can be drop-shipped anywhere, so I _THINK_ you could even have it delivered to your house in large drums.. It's expensive (~$3/gal) but it may be worth it to you if you want to contribute to (a)saving the ozone layer and/or (b)keeping US$ out of the hands of despotic Arab states (and their terrorist pawns)..

    Couple interesting Wired links on biodiesel:
    here and
    here

    Even non-biodiesel is a better global environmental choice than gasoline/petrol since it's less intensive to refine. Diesel creates more NOx, large-particulate exhaust and sulfur (which lead to smog and acid rain), but the balance of impact is in its favor overall due to the efficiency of diesel engines. Also, if we could press for low-sulfur diesel, NOx could be handled with catalytic converters.

    Oh, did I mention that biodiesel can be made from any biological substance that contains triglycerides? Hempseed, soybean, even used cooking fats can be 'cracked' into biodiesel, leaving glycerin. What to do with the glycerin though, that's the main Q...

  47. A second electric? by fm6 · · Score: 2

    Does the Honda have a dead engine that's not worth fixing? If so, consider pulling the engine and replacing it with an electric plant, like this guy did. There's not much in the way of off-the-shelf electric cars (the EV-1 was obviously GM's attempt to prove that they're too expensive to sell) but there's a thriving community of people doing EV conversions.

  48. How about Corbin Motors? by zaren · · Score: 3, Informative

    Corbin sells an electric-only model, the Sparrow; they were in the Jet Li movie, "The One", in the final scene about "the cleanest city in America":

    Sparrow's Specifications

    * Onboard battery charger
    * Three-wheeled vehicle registers, insures and parks as a motorcycle
    * 1350 lbs. curb weight, 72-inch wheel base, 57 inches vehicle height
    * 70 mph top speed, 20-40 mile range
    * $14,900 retail price

    The Sparrow II has a 30-60 mile range and a $16,900 retail price. Corbin also advertises a gas-powered car, the Merlin, with "a 300 to 400 mile range on a tank of gas and a projected 70 to 90 miles per gallon", but it won't be out until the fall of 2003.

    --
    Come to the University of Mars! Classes starting soon!
    1. Re:How about Corbin Motors? by inertia187 · · Score: 1

      You might want to mention that both the Sparrows and Merlin are one seaters. Who needs those other three seats anyway? Pretty neat package.

      --
      A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
  49. The Ford Think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Check out the Ford Think.

    http://www.thinkmobility.com

    It's completely electric, and the next version is supposed to have a top speed of 65 (currently it's 55). I met a guy with one, and he said it was great. The best is you can park it almost anywhere since it's so small (about the size of those European SMART cars).

  50. Get a honda hybrid. by gully42 · · Score: 1

    I've owned a 2000 honda insight http://www.insightcentral.net for almost two years now, and love it. 68 mpg in the mountains of colorado. 700 mile range with a 10 gallon tank. Every day someone asks me about it, they are drawn to it's exotic space pod looks. And the best feature: a total geek chick magnet. How many other cars can you say that about? If you need more seats, go for the prius or the hybrid civic. But either way, enjoy the acceleration, efficiency and regeneration of an EV with the range and simplicity of a gas vehicle. I go so long between fuel ups that I forget which side the gas cap is on.

    --
    fortune: You die cold and alone
  51. two more cars by paulschreiber · · Score: 2
    i'm in the process of purchasing a Prius myself, but in the interest of being informative, two more vehicles are:
    • Toyota RAV4 EV electric, zero-emission SUV
    • Honda Civic Hybrid hybird ULEV (unlike the Prius and Insight, which are SULEVs)
  52. Toyota Rav4-EV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hello? Has anyone seen or heard of the Toyota RAV4-EV? http://rav4ev.toyota.com/consumer/rav4ev_0_home/ra v_home.htm Range of ~100 miles, available in the Bay Area, roomy, 65mph+, looks like it meets Ellen's requirments. You could be really cool and install solar cells to charge it (like http://www.solarwarrior.com).

  53. Have Prius ... love it. by Dr.+Zowie · · Score: 5, Informative
    The Prius isn't alternative-fuel -- just alternative-powertrain. It has loads of cool, geeky features that work together to make ... (drumroll) an ordinary 4-door family car. While I don't have a family (yet) it's nice to be able to throw some friends in the back. Basically, they've used the high-efficiency powertrain to give you a conventional 4-door car with Geo-Metro-like efficiency.

    I've put about 11,000 miles on my Prius in the first year of ownership. About half of them are highway miles on roadtrips; about 10% of them are short (1-2 mile) hops in town. Its lifetime fuel economy is about 48MPG. Range is about 500-600 miles. On the highway it consistently gets over 45 MPG (and I'm not gentle on the throttle -- 70-80 MPH on the level, and I floor it when I'm crossing the Rockies -- I live in Colorado). In town it gets 35-38 for the first mile or two, until the engine is warm -- then more like 48-52.

    The Prius has no transmission at all -- just a second differential that shunts power between two electric motors/generators and the engine. (How it works). It's all drive-by-wire: the gas pedal is just a rheostat connected to the drive computer.

    The engine has a lot of cool stuff to it: an off-center crankshaft, variable compression ratio, and (ISTR) noncircular pistons. Because of the differential it runs at more or less whatever speed the computer wants, regardless of how fast you're going.

    For me (in Colorado) a pure EV was right out because of the low energy density of batteries -- it's hard to climb mountains in a pure EV. The Prius battery is used for load leveling on the engine (gas engines run best when the load is conditioned). Climbing over about 2000 feet vertical at freeway speeds drains the battery, but the computer handles it gracefully and the car just slows down to about 55 mph (on a standard 7% freeway grade). Conversely, coming down more than about 1000 feet of altitude will fill the battery to the top from regen braking, and again the computer does the Right Thing, using the engine as a conventional compression brake rather than blowing up the battery pack.

    So even though the Prius isn't designed for mountain climbing it works acceptably under even strenuous climbing conditions. The interior is roomy and holds five people with no trouble. The trunk is adequate. The ride is quiet, and the gas mileage sure doesn't stink. Cornering is very good: tight turn radius and surprising traction given the high-mileage tires. Clearance is adequate but low: it's 4 inches under load, though the bottom 2 inches is just a flexible plastic air dam -- so you can get over 5" high obstacles without killing the car.

    The Insight gets better gas mileage, looks cooler, and has better acceleration when you actually want it (though I imagine Prius ROM mods will come out one day that boost the acceleration -- the computer really does use conservative settings), but it's also really tiny -- the Insight is more of a "geek sports car". Toyota went out of their way to make the Prius look-and-feel like a basic (if plush) family car, and they succeeded.

    1. Re:Have Prius ... love it. by Winged+Cat · · Score: 2

      it's hard to climb mountains in a pure EV

      Sorry, wrong. Been there, done that in my EV-1. Piece o' cake. The motor's reaction: "Mountain? What mountain? Feels like level ground to me." (Granted, this was on a road going up a mountain, but still...)

    2. Re:Have Prius ... love it. by Dr.+Zowie · · Score: 2

      The motor isn't the problem. It's the batteries. There's not nearly as much energy per unit mass in batteries as there is in gasoline, and driving up (say) a vertical mile just isn't an option in most pure EVs. A
      weekend outing from 5,000 feet (Boulder, CO) to
      9,700 feet (Hessi township) -- almost a vertical
      mile -- is pretty common around here.

    3. Re:Have Prius ... love it. by Winged+Cat · · Score: 1

      I didn't notice much extra energy consumption when doing that in my EV-1, but whatever...

  54. WV TDI by Porsche_Pilot · · Score: 1

    Get any of the VW TDIs. 40+MPG, uses the cleaner burning Diesel fuel, and has a good power curve.

    --
    404 sig not found
  55. Alternative fuels vs. alternative drivetrains. by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    It looks like you're looking more at an alternative-drivetrain (Hybrid or electric) rather than alternative-fuel (CNG/Hydrogen/M85) car.

    As to alternative fuel - Biodiesel has been mentioned.

    Regular engines can be converted to CNG with relative ease - I once saw a Dodge Spirit (same car I drive) with a CNG fillup. Try to find a design where the fillup connector (big ball-shaped thing in the case of this car) doesn't stick out - it's ugly.

    Engines can also be converted to use M85 (85% methanol, 15% gasoline), but it's not really worth it. M85 is 15-25% cheaper per gallon, but has only 50% of the energy density. Also, methanol is VERY corrosive, so significant portions of the engine have to be replaced with corrosion-resistant parts. Chrysler made a few M85-capable cars (the FFV version of the Dodge Spirit/Plymouth Acclaim and minivans), and replacement parts for the FFV versions are nearly impossible, if not completely impossible, to find.

    Or wait for the likes of the Escape HEV - 40 MPG in an SUV body, pretty amazing. I'd like to see the middle ground - All of the current hybrids and electrics are tiny little ugly pieces of junk. I want a full-size hybrid sedan that looks just like its gas-powered brethren, or a hybrid minivan.

    Of course, the question is, WHY do you want to go alternative fuel? These days there are far worse things for the environment than modern cars - IC engines have come a LONG way in the areas of emissions control. You're not going to save any money - Electricity costs are skyrocketing, and it's been shown that in the end, pure electrics pollute more. (While coal-fired power plants produce less emissions per kilowatt, by the time you factor in all the transmission/charging losses, you're polluting more). Hybrids get insane gas mileage, but at the moment the technology isn't mature enough. You're going to be paying far more in maintenance costs for your unconventional design.

    I'm not saying that IC engines are here to stay forever, just that hybrids are just plain not viable yet and won't be for a few years.

    If you think Honda cares about the environment, you're wrong. http://www.lemonaidcars.com/secret_warranties.htm - Their emissions control systems were so bad from '95 to '97 that they were FORCED by the EPA to repair any emissions problem with those model years for free - And Honda will fight you all the way on those repairs until you threaten to call the EPA on them. The Insight/Civic HEV is just damage control. If they really wanted to benefit the environment, they'd focus on large vehicles first, where hybrid technology can make the biggest difference. (GM had statistics that if one medium-sized city had their buses replaced with hybrids, it would be better for the environment than if all Civics sold in a given year were hybrids. Which is why they're focusing on buses first - You don't see it much, but GM is pushing hybrid technology research VERY heavily. Same with Ford - Their first hybrid release will be the Escape HEV.)

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  56. Got a guy at work driving a Sparrow by jlowery · · Score: 1

    Cute little squashed lemony thing. Only one seat though, and only enough cargo space for about one sack of groceries or one briefcase.

    Here's his website.

    --
    If you post it, they will read.
  57. How about vegetable oil? by fatwreckfan · · Score: 1
    From The Veggie Van website:
    The Veggie Van goes 70 mph and has driven over 25,000 miles on biodiesel fuel made from new and used vegetable oil. Not only does the three ton, biodiesel powered motor home get 25 miles per gallon on vegetable oil fuel...
  58. Nuclear by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Need a small fission reactor to charge a battery that runs a large electric motor..

    Shove that into a REAL car.. end of problem.

    Dont tell me it cant be done .. its just that the man wont LET us do it.. cant take away all that tax money on oil...

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Nuclear by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      Gives a new meaning to the phrase:

      "Car Bomb"

      oops...

    2. Re:Nuclear by ShavenYak · · Score: 2

      Great idea. You go build one, and let us know how it works out. Don't forget to allow for the weight of shielding. Oh, and the huge cooling tower. Yeah, it'll look weird driving down the road, but think of the fuel sasvings.

      Appropriate quote from BTTF:
      "I'm sure that in 1985, plutonium is available at every corner drug store, but in 1955, it's a little hard to come by." - Dr. Emmett Brown

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
  59. TDI rules by XenoLlama · · Score: 1

    Disclamer: I own one of these wonderful lil' diesel beasts, so I may be biased.

    The TDI powertrain that VW has avalable in the Golf, Jetta, and New Beetle may not be as efficent as the hybrids (we are talking about a difference of 10 mpg at most here) But they have the advantage of, as someone earlier put so eloquently, not looking like total ass.

    They also have NO trouble hitting 100 mph, and do it without slaying the fuel economy. You loose a little of your milage if you throw biodeisel into it, but it requires no modifications, and your emmisions go from 'low emissions vehicle' to 'why not just breathe outta the tailpipe.' (well maybe not THAT good.. )

    But on biodeisel you are able to completely remove all use of fossil fuels entirely. I have never had an issue with my TDI starting in the dead of winter here in the great white north (-25C)

    At the very least, go drive a TDI, they are wonderful, powerful, clean engines.

    And the cars they are in dont look like ass :-)

  60. Civic == BAD DEAL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dont know about the others but the civic is definately not a good deal unless your gas is crazy expensive. If you get the civic (which is QUITE a bit more than a regular civic) it would take you a VERY long time and a LOT of driving out out-weigh the cost of the battery. Also, I don't believe Honda has prices posted for the battery that will eventually have to be replaced. I wouldn't be surprised if it was around $5k. This means that you are spending MUCH more for a shitty little civic... just go with a base civic or a different hybrid vehicle.
    -phraud

  61. From the Tokyo Shimbun by tru+junglist · · Score: 0

    "Toyota is planning on become the first auto maker to market a pollution-free vehicle featuring a hydrogen-powered fuel cell engine. The FCHV-E will begin selling in Tokyo next summer for about US$75,000. The launch will be limited to Tokyo as that is the only city which will have hydrogen refuelling stations. The FCVH-4 can reach speeds up to 150 kph, and can travel 250 kms between refuelling." (Tokyo Shimbun)

    --
    jungle is massive
  62. Ford's Hybrid Escape by brad3378 · · Score: 1
    ....Should be coming out anytime now.
    Fall at the latest. I believe its four wheel drive AND is capable of 40 miles per gallon.

    I've also heard good things about Honda's hybrid.

    Other things to consider:

    If you have a lot of "Stop & Go" traffic like what we have here in the Detroit area, a hybrid might be what you want. Parallel hybrids offer engine and electric motor acceleration simultaneously, while Series hybrids act more like locomotive powertrains, where the engine can be "super-tuned" for a smaller RPM range.

    If you are more likely to be a "cruise control" driver, maybe an electric car like the EV-1 is more your style. I'm told that the EV-1's extremely low aerodynamic drag allowed it to achieve a top speed near 140 MPH merely by disabling a governor. (obviously driving like this cuts into battery life)

    If you need to impress people at the local street races, best bet is to stick with old-school internal combustion technology. The new Corvette and Cobra Mustang are lookin' mighty nice :-)

    --

    1. Re:Ford's Hybrid Escape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      140mph in an Insight - I'd rather ride in a beer can. Wipe out at that speed and you're dead dead dead.

    2. Re:Ford's Hybrid Escape by dhovis · · Score: 2
      Ford has a website for the Escape HEV which says that it is "coming in 2003". I heard Jan. 2003 a while back, but Ford has not committed to a firm release yet. Interestingly, the Escape HEV will be using a 5-stroke cycle engine instead of the usual 4-stroke cycle.

      Some other people have mentioned Ford's Electric division TH!NK, which was a Sweedish company that Ford bought a few years back. They are selling the TH!NK City in some markets now, as well as two models of electric-assist bicycles, and a souped-up golf cart called the TH!NK neighbor, which is targetted at people in subdivisions with low speed limits.

      The TH!NK website also mentions some other Ford products, like 50 EV Ford Rangers available for lease in S. Cal, and the upcoming Focus FCV, a hydrogen fuel cell Ford Focus which Ford has announced will go on sale to fleet buyers in 2004 and they hope to sell to the public in 2008.

      --

      --
      The internet is the greatest source of biased information in the history of mankind.

    3. Re:Ford's Hybrid Escape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You fucking moron. Crash at 140mph in ANY car and be prepared to die. DUH. I'm thinking that most cars won't hold up very well in high-speed crashes over 100mph. Jackass.

    4. Re:Ford's Hybrid Escape by SoftwareJanitor · · Score: 2

      How about two 70mph cars (slow for the highway around here) head on? That's 140mph effectively. Most cars don't hold up very well, to be sure, but tiny little tinfoil deathtrap econoboxes seem to hold up a lot worse than larger vehicles do.

  63. Honda Civic Hybrid is great! by supernova87a · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here's the Honda website on the hybrid civic.

    I test drove this model a few weeks back, and it was an absolute pleasure.

    The best part? Pulling up to a red light, and sitting there in complete silence, without wasting any gas. Ahh...

  64. Question for Submitter: How many miles on Accord? by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2

    I have a running bet with some friends. They claim that Hondas are the most reliable cars in the world. I strongly disagree but I'd like to see some numbers. How many miles did your honda have and what was it's cause of death?

    Thanks!
    Matt

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  65. What about ford? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  66. Alternatives: Corbin Sparrow, VW TDI, RAV4 by abroadst · · Score: 1

    Two alternatives that I would seriously consider in addition to the options that have already been discussed here are the Corbin Sparrow (http://www.corbinmotors.com/sparrow.htm) which is a one-seater all electric made in California, and the Volkswagen TDI diesel engine equipped cars. The advantage of the VW TDI is that you can have a car that gets 50 MPG without any particularly exotic technology or expensive batteries. It supposedly doesn't have sooty exhaust and is a peppier engine that the gasoline model. They've really refined this system since it's so popular in Europe. It's cheap, reliable, and as fuel efficient as gasoline hybrids. VW makes the New Beetle, Golf, Jetta, and Jetta Wagon with the TDI option. The Corbin Sparrow is a very exciting commuter vehicle that, although a little weird looking, is certainly worth checking out too, especially if you like entirely electric solutions. One other option you might check out is the electric Toyota RAV4. I think these may also be available in California. -Andrew

  67. The Prius looks nice by mike3k · · Score: 1

    I test drove the Prius but ended up buying a 2003 Corolla S because it felt more comfortable & performed better on the highway. Maybe in a few years hybrid cars will perform as well as gas-only cars and won't cost too much more, and when that happens I'll probably buy one.

  68. Bogus Environmentalism by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

    Electric cars are not as environmentally friendly as the Eco Extremists would like us to believe. First most electricity is generated using one of three environmentally unfriendly methods; Hydrodynamic, Hydrocarbon and Nuclear.

    Hydro electric is the long term safest method of generating electric power. However, due to recent environmental regulations such as the endangered species act, it is very unlikely that any new sources for Hydro power will emerge. In addition, existing Hydro plant are very likely to come under greater threat severly impacting the amount of energy produce.

    Hydro Carbon based plants (Coal, NG, and Petrol) are nearly toxic polution free. Nearly isn't enough for Eco Extremists. In addition, these plants do release a huge amount of C02 a noted greenhouse gas. Beware of global warming and all that.

    Nuclear power is fairly expensive and quite "dangerous". While the process of generating power from these plants is quite polution free (no gasses, no emmissions in theory)the hazardous waste that is generated is quite deadly and needs longterm storage.

    If you don't take into consideration what it takes to generate power, electric cars look good. Otherwise they look like foolish version of the cars they are supposed to replace.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    1. Re:Bogus Environmentalism by Xeger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This isn't quite true. While I agree that electric cars are not final solution, they do have a number of benefits over dead-dinosaur cars. Let's look at it from a thermodynamic standpoint. Your gasoline engine is a very good engine indeed if it achieves 20% efficiency. This means that 20% of the energy liberated from the gasoline goes toward doing work (spinning your wheels), and 80% escapes into the surrounding environment, as waste heat. In contrast, the electric motor(s) that power your EV are more along the lines of 80% efficient. This means that a whopping four-fifths of the energy coming out of your batteries is directly converted into work! That's four times as efficient as a gasoline engine. Electricity may not grow on trees, true. But most methods of generating electricity are far more than efficient than 20%. Nuclear power has a bad rap, but if done properly it's quite safe. Advances in solar power may soon make it a viable option, and there are a whole slew of experimental technologies out there--nuclear fusion, fuel cell, zero-point--enough that one of them will pan out.

    2. Re:Bogus Environmentalism by nuggz · · Score: 2

      Generating the electricity, transmitting it, and storing it in batteries eat up a significant chunk of the high efficiency of the electric car.

      Additionally the batteries in the electric car aren't the most environmentally friendly things either.

    3. Re:Bogus Environmentalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regenerative braking makes a large contribution to any electric or hybrid vehicle's efficiency, however. In a standard gas-powered car, you can't do this.

    4. Re:Bogus Environmentalism by nathanm · · Score: 2
      Your gasoline engine is a very good engine indeed if it achieves 20% efficiency.
      Most modern internal combustion engines are about 25% efficient. This includes: heat loss, friction loss, loss associated with translating the lateral movement of pistons into rotational movement, etc.
      In contrast, the electric motor(s) that power your EV are more along the lines of 80% efficient.
      Only when you use the immediate mechanical power output of the electric motor over electrical power applied to it. If you factor in power plant efficiency, transmission loss, battery efficiency, friction loss, etc. electric cars are much less efficient than any gasoline powered car, per distance traveled.
    5. Re:Bogus Environmentalism by Quila · · Score: 2

      That's one I never thought of. "Zero emissions, high efficiency" just moved the emissions and efficiency loss further up the line.

  69. Insight, if you are careful by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Honda Insight is a neat car, there are serious problems with it though...

    The battery pack is replaced often.. If you get one get the hyper-extended warrenty, as you will be replacing that battery pack many many times.. my friend has had his 18 months and has replaced his 3 times.... and from what I hear this is not uncommon for insights that are used as a daily driver in anyplace that is not 70-72degF all the time. winter causes the packs to die horribly.

    weight limit.. I CANNOT ride in his car (Ok I'm a fat ass..) as I with him exceed the car's weight limit completely... most any american couple will do this unless you are in souther california and live the bolimic lifestyle or are not normal weight (180 - 230 lbs typical american weight.)

    finally , they ding really really easy. a pop can has thicker metal. dont lean on it, dont fart at it dont even look at it funny as it will ding/dent instantly.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Insight, if you are careful by CokeBear · · Score: 2

      BSA? Since when are the Boy Scout of America advocating Linux?

      --
      Reality has a liberal bias
    2. Re:Insight, if you are careful by Preposterous+Coward · · Score: 2
      normal weight (180 - 230 lbs typical american weight.)

      Hmmm... a 50th percentile adult U.S. male is about 175 pounds, and a 220-pound male is 95th percentile, so while 180 lbs could reasonably be called "typical", 230 is not even close.

      My understanding is that ergonomic analyses are usually done at the 5 and 95 percentile limits (including females, who typically are lighter). That said, the Insight's 365-pound passenger weight limit doesn't seem to leave a lot of leeway for two larger-than-average men, say.

      Maybe you could drive in the car if he didn't top off the tank?

      --

      "Biped! Good cranial development. Evidently considerable human ancestry."
    3. Re:Insight, if you are careful by VivianC · · Score: 2

      Hmmm... a 50th percentile adult U.S. male is about 175 pounds, and a 220-pound male is 95th percentile, so while 180 lbs could reasonably be called "typical", 230 is not even close.

      You must work at a doctor's office or insurance company. Yes, average US male height is 5'10" and their IDEAL weight would be between 175-180 depending on the age of your chart. But with about 40% of Americans considered obese, your average weight rises to around 200. Note that the poster said "TYPICAL" weight and not "AVERAGE IDEAL" weight.

      --
      Viv

      Gmail invites for ip
  70. Low Speed Vehicles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check this out

    Too slow for the needs of the original post....but they build these things a block from where I live, so I have to link them.

    Pretty cool little cars actually. Currently only good for residential areas and golf courses, but larger/faster versions are in the works.

  71. Toyota Fuel Cell Vehicles by j14taylo · · Score: 1

    Toyota is currently working on a Fuel Cell-Electric Hybrid (FCHV) SUV.

    It is based on the Highlander and will be similar to the Prius.
    The main difference being that it will use a fuel cell along with the electric motor instead of a traditional combustion enigine.

    You can read the news brief here

    1. Re:Toyota Fuel Cell Vehicles by j14taylo · · Score: 1

      Sorry, hit submit instead of preview - also check out this link, which has more detail.

    2. Re:Toyota Fuel Cell Vehicles by ShavenYak · · Score: 2

      One small problem:

      Therefore, the fuel cell-powered SUVs, to be available by lease, will be offered only to select private sectors, technology related companies, institutional organizations and research facilities. Although terms have yet to be determined, Toyota plans to lease a total of approximately 20 units during the first year to entities that have access to hydrogen-supply infrastructure and after-sales service.

      Doesn't sound like this is going to be available to the unwashed masses for a while still.

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
  72. air car by cifey · · Score: 1

    Mexico City has ordered 40,000 of these air cars... http://www.globalstewards.org/aircar.htm

    --
    Hello Cruel World
  73. Honda Civic Hybrid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This fall Honda will be releasing the Civic hybrid, and you also may be able to find the Honda EV in SoCal.

  74. True but... by Codex+The+Sloth · · Score: 2

    The brakes are hard on your feet. And don't order that big order of ribs at the drive-thru or it will tip over...

    --
    I am not a number! I am a man! And don't you ... oh wait, I'm #93427. Ha ha! In your face #93428!
  75. home made diesel by paradesign · · Score: 3, Interesting
    my friends dad, down in dallas tx, makes his own diesel for his vw. he uses the leftover oil from fast food places, that apparently just give it to him. heres a link on another guy whos doing it linky linky he says he does it to recycle, not really for emisions reasons.

    my chouce would be the hybrid electric civic or the vw tdi based cars, friends of mine say they are wonderful.

    --
    I want 2D games back.
  76. european cars NOT coming to U.S. anytime soon by theBunkinator · · Score: 1

    I was almost willing to trade a little ugliness (Honda Insight) for some great gas mileage, but then I saw the car live at the dealership and decided it was really way too ugly for only getting 56/58 MPG.

    The magic number European car makers have been aiming for is 3liter/100 km which is just over 70 Miles per galon. And there are some cars that will do this and not look quite as ugly:
    Audi A2 1.2 TDI and VW Lupo as well as some little Citroen vehicle I can't find at the moment.
    Bottom line:
    1. these cars use Diesel to achieve this great mileage. U.S. diesel is too dirty (too much sulfur) to use in these cars.
    2. There is no demand for these cars in the U.S. Please buy a Ford Excursion like all the rest of us brave citizens.
    sorry.

  77. Prius has cool fringe benefits by ZahrGnosis · · Score: 2

    I was looking at these cars 6+ months ago when I was in the market. I had actually ordered a Prius, but cancelled when the 3 month wait turned into a 6 month wait. I hear the wait time is much lower now, tho.

    At the time, only the Insight was really competing with the Prius; the Civic hadn't come out yet. I was living in San Francisco too, and there were plenty of Electric vehicles from Saturn, Honda, and whatnot. The Prius was by far my favourite choice.

    The Prius had 4 doors... the insight is TINY, as are most full-electric vehicles. Far more importantly, tho, was the cool touch-screen system that came with the car. Geek paradise, that. The GPS enabled versions are the same exact electronics that are on the Toyota RAV-4, but without the $3000 add-on price. The dealer I talked to said they didn't think Prius owners would pay the premium for the bundle, so it's apparently greatly discounted and rolled into the car's price. I'm sure you're paying for it, of course, but it's a nice deal.

    The other great thing about the Prius is the grassroots community around it. Prius Mods, a Yahoo! Groups discussion group has been around for a while to discuss cool upgrades and features for the Prius. There are a variety of other good discussion groups out there that you can peruse through a well-placed Google search.

    The only problem with these cars (and it seems to apply to any hybrid or non-gas car these days) is the driving experience... pickup, accelleration, noise (the engines are quiet, but the cars are very light and don't insulate road noise very well; it's a tradeoff), top speed, driving distance (well, the hybrids are GREAT for this; EVs aren't)... etc. But from the research I did six months ago, the Prius was king.

  78. Open source hardware for EVs by stevenso · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know of an open source standard for electric cars? Perhaps something that specified standard parts (ie 12V batteries, 144V system voltage, etc).
    If there is one out there I would be interested in working on it.

  79. Careful with the Sparrow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are rumors that Corbin Motors is having increasing financial difficulty managing their Sparrow line of vehicles. Take a look at the Sparrow owners' Yahoo group to see some of the tension that's periodically surfaced over the past year. The last I heard, Corbin had STOPPED production of new Sparrows because they were running short of cash. They are currently focusing on producing their new Merlin roadster in an effort to get back into profitability. Personally I think they have a good chance at doing so - just be aware that the Sparrow may be a bit of an unsettled choice right now.

  80. If I were in your shoes.... by TrumpetPower! · · Score: 5, Informative

    First a disclaimer: I'm unemployed right now (please check out my resume and hire me!) and driving a '68 VW camper. I can't afford a new car, but that hasn't stopped me from looking.

    The Honda Insight is a fascinating car. It's as if Honda took every neat new technology they've been working on and crammed it in. Unfortunately, it's small--just a two-seater--and expensive--in the low $20Ks.

    For that much money or less, you can get a Volkswagen with the TDI engine. The two-door VW TDIs (the Bug and the Golf) get better mileage than any other car sold in America except for the Insight. You can drive non-stop from Salt Lake City to Los Angeles on one tank of fuel, and that's a trip I personally would take at elast two days to drive. They're also among the least-polluting cars available, though there are cleaner ones out there. The Bug has (one of?) the highest safety ratings you'll find.

    The catch? They're both turbocharged diesel engines. Wait! Don't run away! A diesel engine doesn't have to be the awful, smelly, polluting nightmare you're all thinking of. When properly engineered, as is the TDI, it's superior to gasoline:

    • Proper fuel management, catalytic converters, filters, etc., can reduce emissions to well below the current average for the American fleet (the TDI makes use of every trick in the book in this regards).
    • Diesel takes less energy to produce. Even if you get the same miles per gallon on diesel and gasoline, fewer barrels of oil were refined to make the diesel.
    • Diesel fuel has more energy than gasoline. You can drive more miles on that gallon of diesel than on a gallon of gasoline.
    • Diesel engines have much more torque than gasoline engines. Americans buy horsepower but drive torque. The Bug with the high-power gasoline engine will do 0-60 MPH faster than the diesel (but not by much) and has a higher top speed, but the diesel will easily beat the gasoline in 0-40.

    But the real thing to do with one of these cars is run it off of biodiesel instead of petroleum-based diesel. Biodiesel is a high-cetane (the diesel version of octane) fuel made from vegetable oil. It's non-toxic; you could drizzle it over your salad...though it'd likely taste awful. The maufacturing process is very similar to the soap-making process; if you've ever made soap in your kitchen, you can make biodiesel in your kitchen. Biodiesel and petroleum-based diesel can be blended in any ratio desired simply by pouring them together.

    The real advantage to biodiesel, however, is that every pound of carbon put into the atmosphere via the tailpipe had been previously removed from the atmosphere by the plant. No increased CO2! (Petroleum-based diesel pumps carbon from the ground and puts it into the air.) And, because the plant pulls more carbon out of the air for itself (instead of just its seeds), each pound of biodiesel results in a net decrease of atmospheric CO2.

    In essence, biodiesel is the solar storage mechanism everybody keeps looking for. Run all those trains, trucks, and power plants from solar power (by way of corn and soy) and reduce dependence on oil all at the same time! All the infrastructure is already in place....

    So, buy a car with a TDI engine, and you get incredible mileage and have the option of using either fuel you can find anywhere or a very environmentally-friendly fuel.

    Now, if only somebody would give me a job, I'd go out and buy one....

    b&

    --
    All but God can prove this sentence true.
    1. Re:If I were in your shoes.... by stardyne · · Score: 1

      I agree completely. I have a 2002 TDI Bug, and I love it. Having been a huge commuter in the Denver area (140 miles a day), I was averaging about 55+ mpg with mostly highway driving (averaging 70+ mph). Now that I am not commuting as much, the mpg has decreased (to 50 mpg).

      Living in Denver, we had a few extremely cold days this past winter. I never once had a problem starting the car.

      I would definitely recommend VW TDI's to anyone who needs the advantages of a gasoline car, but wants the extended gas millege as well (700+ miles per tank).

    2. Re:If I were in your shoes.... by seebs · · Score: 2

      My insight was around $18k with A/C and everything; I've seen them around $15k in lots of places.

      The insight may not be quite as efficient as the best of the best diesel... but which line of research would you rather support?

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    3. Re:If I were in your shoes.... by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      Hi,
      US Diesels can't have euro catalytic converters: our diesel's got too much sulfur in it.

      Still, whenever we can get reduced-sulfur requirements into law (perhaps CA can lead the way in this??)..

    4. Re:If I were in your shoes.... by tbmaddux · · Score: 2
      The two-door VW TDIs (the Bug and the Golf) get better mileage than any other car sold in America except for the Insight.
      Wait a second. Honda Civic Hybrid gets 46/51 (city/highway), which is better than Golf (42/49) and new Beetle (42/49 also). The mpg of the Prius is inverted (higher city than highway), so it's harder to compare, but its combined mpg is also higher than the two diesel VWs.
      They're also among the least-polluting cars available, though there are cleaner ones out there.
      Actually, those same pages show they're among the most-polluting cars, rating 1 out of 10 on the EPA air pollution score -- yuck. Meanwhile the hybrids rate anywhere from a 6 (Insight 5spd in most of the US) to a 10 (Prius).
      --
      Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?
    5. Re:If I were in your shoes.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the VW lupo gets 90 mpg

    6. Re:If I were in your shoes.... by istewart · · Score: 1

      And a prototype Lupo built from much lighter-weight materials gets 130 mpg. But they won't sell it here. Bastards.

      Oh well, even if I did have a Lupo GTI, it'd probably get sucked into the radiator of an Excursion.

    7. Re:If I were in your shoes.... by person-0.9a · · Score: 1

      I'll cast my vote in for the Volkwagen TDI engines also.

      I swapped my Ford behemoth SUV in for 2001 TDI New Beetle, and haven't regretted the decision.

      The Insight was never an option for me because I would need to haul largish dogs on rare occassion, or a third passenger more frequently.

      With the TDI Jetta/Beetle getting simliar gas mileage to the Prius [for my driving habits], it came down to which one met my lifestyle more.

      I opted for the Beetle given ability to easily adapt to odd (dog) shaped cargo, comfort, and better handling than the Prius.

      Of course, the best thing about the New Beetle [for me] is filling up every three weeks instead of every three days.

    8. Re:If I were in your shoes.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That wasn't a disclaimer, it was a job pitch. Somebody mod this fucker down.

    9. Re:If I were in your shoes.... by donnz · · Score: 1

      "The real advantage to biodiesel, however, is that every pound of carbon put into the atmosphere via the tailpipe had been previously removed from the atmosphere by the plant. No increased CO2! (Petroleum-based diesel pumps carbon from the ground and puts it into the air.) And, because the plant pulls more carbon out of the air for itself (instead of just its seeds), each pound of biodiesel results in a net decrease of atmospheric CO2. "

      Of course, you assume that they are not using synthetic fertilizers on the crop...I guess the refining process would use wsolar power too.

      --
      -- Free software on every PC on every desk
  81. Canyonero by green+pizza · · Score: 2

    (Kissing my Karma goodbye...)

    Can you name the truck with four wheel drive,
    Smells like a steak, and seats thirty five?
    Canyonero! Canyonero!
    Well, it goes real slow with the hammer down
    It's the country-fried truck endorsed by a clown
    Canyonero...
    Canyonerooo!
    (Krusty)Hey hey!
    The federal highway commision has ruled the Canyonero unsafe for highway or city driving.
    Canyonerooo!
    Twelve yards long, two lanes wide, sixty-five tons of American pride!
    Canyonero...
    Canyonerooo!
    Top o' the line in utility sports,
    unexplained fires are a matter for the courts!
    Canyonero...
    Canyonerooo!
    She blinds everybody with her super-high beams,
    she's a squirrel-squashin', deer-smackin', drivin' machine!
    Canyonero...
    Canyonerooo!
    Yah!
    Yah, Canyonero!
    Yah!
    Whoa, Canyonero!
    Whoa!

  82. Say goodbye to your engine by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    Ignition timing and fuel injector timing have to be changed for alternative fuels. Not too difficult, but it's not as simple as filling up. Improper fuel mixture can kill your engine very quickly.

    And that's not even taking into account that alcohol-based fuels are very corrosive and will destroy engine parts not made specifically to tolerate them. (Like the FFV Chrysler vehicles of the late '80s and early '90s)

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  83. InsightCentral will teach you about the Insight by tbmaddux · · Score: 2
    InsightCentral is better IMO than the pages produced by Honda at explaining the Insight. Take a look also at the lifetime MPG database. YMMV, of course.

    Other notes: A hybrid (Prius, Insight, Civic Hybrid) does not qualify for an electric vehicle tax credit, but does qualify for a "clean fuel" tax deduction, for up to $2000 (you needn't itemize to take the deduction). A hybrid may or may not qualify you to single-passenger-drive in HOV lanes... in California, it does not. This is typically because hybrids (burning gasoline) are not regarded by the goverment as true "alternative fuel" vehicles.

    Disclaimer: I own an Insight, have put almost 50k miles on it and overall I've averaged 74 mpg. That means I spend about half as much on gas as people driving a regular Civic. It is ULEV-rated for emissions and the Insight tops the list of the Top 10 or so most fuel-efficient cars you could ever get in the U.S. I love my car. You could say that makes me a bit biased.

    --
    Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?
  84. fryer oil by Anonymous+Cowrad · · Score: 2, Informative

    All of the fryer oil is spoken for. There's a big market for used grease. Almost every restaurant has a contract with a grease buyer. The buyer removes it from the restaurant (sometimes for a fee, even) and sells it off to chemical blending companies.

    It gets turned into conveyor lubricant for wet conveyors (soda bottlers, breweries, etc) and tire mounting lubricant. I'm sure there are a thousand other things it gets turned into as well.

    Oh, and it smells fucking awful.

    --

    --
    pants ahoy
    1. Re:fryer oil by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2
      Don't forget hamburger grease. I used to work at McDonald's; you wouldn't believe how much fat would end up in the grills' grease traps. At the end of the day, you got to pour several gallons of steaming hot pure saturated fat into a special drum next to the dumpster.

      Even if engines could run on this stuff though, with only a few gallons per day an entire McDonald's probably wouldn't generate enough fuel for more than a couple of cars with average driving habits .

    2. Re:fryer oil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      reusing used fryer oil could supply 5% of the fuel need sof the US.

    3. Re:fryer oil by MacGod · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Accch! That's my retirement grease!"

      -Groundskeeper Willy

      --
      "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one " -Albert Einstein
    4. Re:fryer oil by raddan · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Here's an article about a couple of Hampshire College boys who converted a diesel VW bus into a completely fryer-oil vehicle. Apparently, they also set up a company to make diesel-to-fat conversion kits for diesel vehicles with venture capital, but I haven't heard anything about it lately.

      Apparently, since many of the restaurants they got their fat from had to pay to have their fry grease removed, they were more than happy to give it away for free. The article sez they drove clear across the U.S.

    5. Re:fryer oil by Panaflex · · Score: 2

      Don't forget Dog and Cat food! Dogs love that special gravy train.

      --
      I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
    6. Re:fryer oil by sopwath · · Score: 1

      In high school I went on a tour of the "Mall of America" They had rows of 55 gallon drums of congealed fat from all the little food shops. The guide said they used it in a lot of cosmetics, expecially lipstick. Think about that next time you kiss your wife.

  85. look at what Arizona did, then run ... run fast by Triumph+The+Insult+C · · Score: 2, Informative

    Arizona tried something like this, but they started with regular vehicles and then gave tax credits to people who converted their vehicles to be hybrid gasoline and natural gas. If your state tries to do something like this, run for the hills. Arizona is at least $1US billion in the red because to these tax credits. They are trying to work the numbers to make it $1 billion. To sum it up, don't let your local gov't give tax credits for AFVs ... it'll end up costing more.

    --
    vodka, straight up, thank you!
    1. Re:look at what Arizona did, then run ... run fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those who don't know:
      Arizona's congresscritters passed a bill that gave a tax credit for AFVs. They did not put a dollar limit on the vehicles, nor did they restrict add on features. They allowed Bi-fuel vehicles, no restriction on how much Alternate fuel they must hold or use. Instead of giving a rebate on the conversion they gave a rebate ON THE WHOLE VEHICLE . The bill also reduced or eliminated vehicle taxes on the vehicles for 5 years.
      Later we find out one of the Congress Critters owns a part of one of three approved conversion companies in Arizona. (guess who didn't get re-elected!). so now we have hundreds of SUVs with 5gal propane tanks on them running around Phx burning Gasoline. what a friggen waste of my money!
      maX_

  86. How about a Smart Car? Oh wait... this is the US by CreationLtd · · Score: 1

    If you lived in Europe you could get one of these. Unfortunately those of us stuck in the backwaters of the civilized world there's not a whole lot of choice. http://www.thesmart.co.uk/

  87. Re:Jetta TDI has better mileage by GeckoX · · Score: 1

    Way more expensive, and there are no production models as of yet...I.E.: No pudding to find the proof in.

    --
    No Comment.
  88. Re:Jetta TDI has better mileage by CMiYC · · Score: 2

    According to VW's site the TDI Manual only gets 49 MPG on the highway. Here is the link to the link to the specs. While the Civic Hybrid is rated at 51 MPG on the highway. The link (pdf) to the Civic's specs is here. Neither of these compare to Insight which gets 68 MPG, according to edmund's listed specs.

    Now I'm not sure how you can say that the TDI has the best mileage for any vehicle that uses fossil fuel, when, it does not get the best mileage.

    It should also be noted that the Jetta TDI burns diseal fuel instead of Unleaded gasoline. I do not, however, remember if diseal or unleaded burns cleaner.

  89. Why do you think electricity is better than fuel? by Evro · · Score: 1

    Why do people believe that using electric vehicles is better for the environment than fossil-fuel powered combustion-driven ones? The electricity has to come from somewhere, and unless you live near Niagara Falls or some other Hydroelectric facility, your choices are Coal, Oil, and Nuclear as sources of electricity (wind and solar not being reliable enough or common enough to be mentioned), all of which have their own methods of polluting. I really would like to know this, because all I've been hearing for 10-20 years is "conserve electricity," and now people are finding new and exciting ways to waste it. I just cannot see how people are reconciling these facts with themselves. While having a car that has no emissions is a nice idea, electricity certainly isn't a zero-emission fuel source, unless, as I said, you are near a dam. Otherwise you're just centralizing the emissions to wherever the electricity is being produced.

    If someone can enlighten me, I'd appreciate it.

    --
    rooooar
  90. Honda Insight! (70mpg, D/E Hybrid, No Recharging!) by @madeus · · Score: 2

    The Honda Insight is a lovely peice of work.

    Certainly as a Hybrid it's not the greenest solution (compared to an all-electric), but it fairs well (at nearly 70 Miles Per Gallon it's one of the most efficent Diesel engines in the world) and it has very quick acceleration for a Hybrid, and I think it still manages to look pretty sexy.

    The real bonus is that although it is a Diesel/Electric Hybrid you never have to recharge! It automatically regarchages whenever you decelerate (IIRC). This means you can travel long distances, e.g. cross country, without worring about having to recharge.

    Honda have been selling them at an 18,000 USD loss IIRC.

    I don't own a car (mmm public transportation) but if I did it would be one of these.

    I think the only downside would be lack of space, like a lot of regular environmentally friendly cars.

  91. Hold out for the new NSX :) by nbast · · Score: 1

    There are rumors that the next NSX will have electric assist as seen in the Honda DualNote (Acura DN-X) show car. It's still a year or two away, but if the rumors are true, we should see a 400+ hp supercar that gets 35-40 mpg. Let's see, if I start saving now, I might be able to afford one by 2010... image

  92. Biodiesel and California air by Spamalamadingdong · · Score: 2

    Diesel engines have greater NOx emissions than most gasoline vehicles, plus vastly higher particulate emissions. I understand that both of these can be dealt with but you won't be able to buy a vehicle with such technology installed. If you are motivated by a desire to keep the air clean rather than carbon-abatement you are probably better off with one of the gasoline or CNG vehicles instead. People living in thinly-populated areas with large distances to travel would probably make the opposite selection, on the merits.

    1. Re:Biodiesel and California air by johnny+cashed · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Diesels do have greater NOx emissions/unit fuel burned. However, Diesel are lean burn engines (hince the greater NOx) and are more fuel effecient. I would not say that they have "vastly" higher particulate emissions, gasoline engines have particulate emissions, but their soot is finer, and not visible (to the naked eye).

      Modern Diesel cars do have catalytic converters, and other emission controls which enable them to have better emissions than gasoline fueled cars. If fueled with biodiesel, they have even better emissions.

    2. Re:Biodiesel and California air by t0ph3rus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Diesel engines do have higher particulate emissions. However, they are large particles. Large particles fall to the ground quicker and can not reach the lungs as easily. Also, Diesel gets much better milage. There fore you are burning less diesel than gas for the same mileage. Gas engines with there invisible gas particles are much worse for the environment and our lungs since there pollutants stay suspended. This has long been a myth with diesel since people see soot and a louder engine they think that It's worse for the environment than gas engines.

    3. Re:Biodiesel and California air by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In Europe at least PSA (Peugeot-Citroen) manufactures diesel motors with a particle filter which virtually eliminates all (try in the 99% range and over) soot.

      Since the new generation of HDi (that's their moniker) motors are developed in collaboration with Ford, maybe this technique will reach the US one day.

    4. Re:Biodiesel and California air by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      European diesels also have extra particulate filters and better catalytic converters. All possible since they had the smarts to take the sulfur out of their diesel fuel.

    5. Re:Biodiesel and California air by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, no one ever killed themselves by running a diesel car in a closed garage, and it's not just because of the noise and the small. Check out the CO (carbon monoxide) emmissions on a disel vs. a gas engine and you'll see why.

    6. Re:Biodiesel and California air by operagost · · Score: 1

      The fact that there's thousands of rigs and buses out there with absolutely no catalysts or other means of cutting down on harmful emissions makes me me think they're worse for the environment. Fortunately, strides are being made in this area, but since retrofits are only happening voluntarily (usually on city buses) it's a slow process. Trust me, unless it's regulated you'll never see a tractor-trailer with a cat on it. Hell, the way these companies encourage ... no REQUIRE their drivers to illegally drive too many hours without sleep, they'll probably slap a fake sticker on the stacks (diesel cats are retrofit mufflers) and pretend they're in compliance.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    7. Re:Biodiesel and California air by CuCullin · · Score: 1

      Care of biodiesel.org:

      The use of biodiesel in a conventional diesel engine results in substantial reduction of unburned hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, and particulate matter. Emissions of nitrogen oxides are either slightly reduced or slightly increased depending on the duty cycle and testing methods. The use of biodiesel decreases the solid carbon fraction of particulate matter (since the oxygen in biodiesel enables more complete combustion to CO2), eliminates the sulfate fraction (as there is no sulfur in the fuel), while the soluble, or hydrocarbon, fraction stays the same or is increased. Therefore, biodiesel works well with new technologies such as catalysts (which reduces the soluble fraction of diesel particulate but not the solid carbon fraction), particulate traps, and exhaust gas recirculation (potentially longer engine life due to less carbon).

    8. Re:Biodiesel and California air by afidel · · Score: 1

      almost any recent turbo-diesel will have particulate emmisions in line with gasoline powered vehicles. The Volkswagon turbodiesels in particular are very clean.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    9. Re:Biodiesel and California air by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      which gives off more NOx; my 1.9l TDI engine, or that monster 5.0l gas engine in the SUV next to me? (not really looking for an answer; it is obvious)

    10. Re:Biodiesel and California air by spauldo · · Score: 1

      From what I hear about DOT in California and their money-scamming ways, companies wouldn't get away with just slapping up a sticker.

      As a classic car owner, I can see your point about older vehicles not being upgraded with emissions controls - but keep in mind, those vehicles were not designed for such things, and lose performance with them installed.

      The good news is that classic cars without emissions controls are getting more and more rare, so eventually your point will become moot. If we get regulation on them today, then in ten years diesel emission controls will be commonplace. After all, those vehicles aren't economical to maintain for more than fifteen years or so.

      --
      Those who can't do, teach. Those who can't teach either, do tech support.
    11. Re:Biodiesel and California air by drinkypoo · · Score: 2
      In the US a certain fineness of particulate matter was mandated by the feds. It turns out that the bigger particles are trapped by lung cilia, while the finer stuff is more likely to be trapped in the lung wall and cause cancer.

      Thank you, government! Anyone wonder why Americans fear their government now? Not to mention that whole food pyramid thing, the latest article in the NY Times explaining how the government lied to us and caused an obesity epidemic. Those who know what is best for us must rise and save us from ourselves - or fuck us right in the culo.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:Biodiesel and California air by twinpot · · Score: 1

      Cetainly not true for some of the modern European diesels. Have a look for instance at the new PSA (Peugeot/Citroën) diesels, complete with particle filters/burners.

  93. Diesel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was a kid, we had a Volvo diesel. The previous owner had installed a second tank. I remember a trip to Florida - we filled up once on the way. The new VW diesels look awesome...you should look at them.

  94. When the oil wells run dry. by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1

    Alternative fuel cars will not be developed seriously until the oil wells run dry. Until then, we will just have to continue financing terrorism by buying arab oil, or start riding bicycles.

    --
    How ya like dat?
  95. You got lucky. by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    My family had an old Civic.

    New piston rings every 1-2 years
    Slipping clutch that was ultimately its downfall (rearended trying unsuccessfully to pull out of a tollbooth)

    We rented an Accord in California once. It was literally falling apart (less than a year old and the rear bumper was coming off) - I've seen quite a lot of other Hondas with improperly attached rear bumpers.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:You got lucky. by Hack+Shoeboy · · Score: 0

      I don't know about anyone else, but these two unsubstantiated anecdotes have convinced me that Hondas are poorly engineered and unreliable. Thank you for the great service you have rendered, Andy Dodd!

      --

      IN TEH FUCHAR, LITERSY WLIL EB OPSHANAL!!!!!111
    2. Re:You got lucky. by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

      Hondas poorly engineered and unreliable - Maybe, maybe not. Overengineered more like it - Too many fancy features that are additional failure points in the engine (VTEC, etc.)

      Vastly overrated - Definately.

      Too many of their anticipated problems are hid under the cloak of "routine maintenance". I don't have access to it right now, but I've seen statistics that "routine" scheduled maintenance for Hondas tends to be far more expensive and extensive than for other cars. Let's not forget that many Honda parts are dealer-only items (read $$$). Have you seen transmission fluid for a Honda at K-mart? Nope. Don't think you'll even find it at an auto parts store. K-mart carries Dexron/Mercon (Many Ford/GM cars, and I believe some imports), and ATF+3 (Specific to only one model of Chrysler transmission, but available in K-mart nonetheless.)

      I was simply refuting the original posters claim that Hondas are indestructible and infallible. They're not. Not even close. Every manufacturer has their weak points, and none is perfect.

      Ford - Body rust
      GM - Generally haven't heard much bad about them
      Chrysler - 4-speed automatics (Note: Designed by the same company that designed the transmissions Honda uses!) die easily. 3-speeds and manuals are far more durable.
      Honda - Emissions systems so bad from '95-97 that Honda was forced by the EPA to repair emissions problems for free for the life of the car. Also I've heard their automatic trannies can be problematic. (Not surprised considering the connection to the Chrysler sick-oh-four mentioned above)

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    3. Re:You got lucky. by Hack+Shoeboy · · Score: 0
      GM - Generally haven't heard much bad about them

      How's that GM stock of yours doing, Andy?

      --

      IN TEH FUCHAR, LITERSY WLIL EB OPSHANAL!!!!!111
    4. Re:You got lucky. by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

      I don't know. I said I didn't hear anything bad about them - I also did not say that I heard anything good about them. I'd say about average, just like most other manufacturers. They don't have any major problems, but they don't have anything great that stands out. For example, Chrysler's 4-speed automatics are horrendous, but Chrysler has a stellar reputation for engine design (426 Hemi, Slant Six, common block 2.2/2.5 - First one is a performance legend, the latter two are some of the most reliable engines ever made. 300k miles? No problem.) Too bad Daimler is sending that down the tubes. Soon they'll be using *Hyundai* engines! Gotta love Korean reliability!

      Anyway, I'm not talking stock prices here. (My GM stock isn't doing anything - I don't own any. I don't own any car company stocks. I drive a '93 Dodge Spirit that's rock-solid at 150k and has at least 50k more miles to go.)

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    5. Re:You got lucky. by Quila · · Score: 2

      GM - Generally haven't heard much bad about them

      Ross Perot got kicked off their board by complaining about the poor quality of cars.

  96. Re:Jetta TDI has better mileage by Coolfish · · Score: 3, Informative


    Way more expensive, and there are no production models as of yet...I.E.: No pudding to find the proof in.


    erm, both cars are in production. in fact i could have bought a '99.5 Jetta TDI a while back but it just didn't have enough balls.. but it's still a sweet car.

    and I read a review in the local paper that compared the two cars, and they found that they got better mileage in the Jetta.. so anypoop.

  97. your name is cliff and you have a husband?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go hawaii!! Go linux!! I can't get a stable enough windows machine to run nwn! I prefer linux, even with its surplus of bugs.

  98. Toyota RAV4-EV by Mr_Dew · · Score: 1

    If you are in California, an area that was leasing EV-1's, then you can probably also find Toyota RAV4-EV's as well (I'm not so lucky).

    The RAV4 is listed with a top speed of 78 mph and an average range of 126 miles per charge (although I've read a few people stating 140 - YMMV).

  99. Re:Jetta TDI has better mileage by Spamalamadingdong · · Score: 1

    Unleaded burns cleaner, but the diesel will usually have lower carbon emissions. As always, YMMV (pun intended).

  100. It's a great little car by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I recently had the pleasure of riding in one of these cars, and they're way nifty. Four of us drove from Washington DC to somewhere in central Pennsylvania and back again (about 4 hours at highway speeds each direction) on about half a tank of gas. It lasted a long time between tanks in the city too, even with all the stop'n'go driving of DC. I was *incredibly* impressed.

    It had plenty of amenities too (CD player, AC, power locks and windows), rode quietly, was comfortable enough for a long trip, and didn't feel like it would blow away in a strong breeze. If I hadn't already purchased a new car 2 years ago, I would seriously consider one of these.

    Of course, my opinion doesn't substitute for research, but on an aesthetic level I was happy as a passenger, and on a techie level I was all tingly at the thought of the reciprocating brake system recharging the batteries as we glided (glode?) to a halt.

    GMFTatsujin

  101. here is an Idea by rocket97 · · Score: 0

    Take all the useless Linux junk and burn that then you should have enough fuel to last a long time, after all that is all that Linux is good for.

    --
    "The two most abundant elements in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity." -Harlan Ellison
  102. Re:Question for Submitter: How many miles on Accor by Fastball · · Score: 2

    I don't know about Accords, but Civics have about the same half life as plutonium. Unless you're doing stunt work or competing on a racing circuit with a Civic, they'll run seemingly forever. I've had two, an '85 and a '96, and I loved driving them except for traffic jams. Lines of sight past the monster SUVs that litter the highways are poor and make for a boring, risky drive.

  103. Re:Question for Submitter: How many miles on Accor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a 1993 Honda Accord with 158,161 miles. Other than normal maintenance (brakes, exhaust, oil changes) the only major problem I've had is a blown front balance seal (a known problem with the 93 Accords).

  104. Re:Jetta TDI has better mileage by tbmaddux · · Score: 2

    Of course, all hybrid cars still use fossil fuels. According to the EPA, the Jetta's combined MPG is only 45, which is about 10% worse than both Civic Hybrd and Prius (see this list of the all-time best mpg-getting cars).

    --
    Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?
  105. A happy Prius owner by MerlynEmrys67 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have had my Prius for about 4 months now... Got a brand new 2002 in Feb, there might be used cars available, but for the Prius a year old car was the same price as a new car. It goes 80+ MPH, gets around 50 MPG when I was commuting. Now I moved closer to work (that does a lot better for the environment anyway) and because it doesn't idle at low speeds on the interstate, only gets about 40 MPH when I actually drive it. The deal maker for me was the backseat. While the Insite gets better gas mileage, the lack of a backseat meant I couldn't take my daughter in the car... The Prius is an awesome car and I would recommend it to anyone that was willing to spend a few bucks to help save the environment

    --
    I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them
  106. IMO, The Insight is the way to go. by MontytheMooch · · Score: 1

    I've owned my Insight for just over a year. I drive 70 miles (one way Manchester, CT. to Hudson, MA.) to work on Sunday, Monday, Tuesday, and every other Wednesday.

    My personal best is 800 miles on a single 10 gallon tank. You just can't beat that.

    Comfortable car.
    Fun to drive.

    A definate winner

  107. Ethanol is no solution, it's part of the problem by Spamalamadingdong · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Between fertilizer, pesticides/herbicides and fuel required for cultivation, a gallon of ethanol yielding 77,000 BTU of energy requires inputs totalling about 131,000 BTU (if memory serves). In other words, it's a complete boondoggle.

  108. Insight or Civic by dudasp · · Score: 1

    It depends on how many strangers you want to talk to...
    I own a Honda Insight, and I would definitely recommend it. It stands out in traffic though. People ask me about it when I'm sitting at stoplights or gas stations, or wherever. Clearly the Civic Hybrid will blend in a bit better.

    So if you want to lead by actions alone, I would get the Civic; if you get the Insight, expect looks and questions.

    Phil

    P.S. Pay no attention to the "uncomfortable" claims, I am 6'0" and around 210, and I have no problems with the car I drive everyday.

  109. honda by ajw1976 · · Score: 1

    Check out the Honda Civic Gas/Electric hybrid. It gets ~50mpg and is a good quality car.

    --
    1. Bad signature
    2. ?????
    3. Profit
  110. Alternative options by m_chan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For our next vehicle, my wife and I are considering the Ford Escape Hybrid. Overly-wrought flash page without much detailed info, but they basically say it will be an gas/electric combo SUV that gets ~40mpg and they will have a 4wd option, which is something that we actually need and use regularly as an avid skiers and hikers. We need the cargo space for my two large dogs, which rule out existing hybrid solutions; We currently drive a Ford Explorer and await a more fuel-efficient yet not entirely anemic solution.

    Also, we drive an all-electric vehicle which though outside of the poster's requirements, may warrant consideration for anyone doing short-haul driving in sub-35 mph zones: the line of vehicles from GEM

    We have been driving one for about 3 months now and use it for commuting to our offices and to downtown Portland. Neither commute requires us to exceed 25mph.

    It has more pick-up than you might think. In the rain, the vehicle does a pretty good job of keeping water off you (my model doesn't have doors). There are doors available, similar to what you would see on a Jeep CJ, as an aftermarket accessory. It is an ideal neighborhood car.

    Here are answers to some of the common questions we get, often in traffic.
    Q. What the hell is that?
    A. A GEM electric car, manufactured by Global Electric Motors, a division of DaimlerChrysler Corporation. The specific model I have is the GEM E825 Utility Vehicle (Short Box).
    Q. Is it street legal?
    It is on streets with a speed limit of 35mph or below.
    Q. How fast does it go?
    A. 25 mph.
    Q. How far can you drive it?
    It varies based on the terrain you are driving it on and the ambient temperatures, but I have driven it over 15 miles on a charge. The stated range is 35 miles.
    Q. How do you charge it?
    It charges on household current.
    Q. Stats?
    A. From the GEM website
    Curb Weight: 1160 lb. with batteries
    GVW: 1850 lb. (Gross Vehicle Weight)
    Width: 55 inches
    Wheelbase: 71.1 inches
    Length: 116 inches
    Height: 69.5 inches
    Turning Radius: 13 feet 7 inches
    Q. Is it fun?
    A. You betcha.

    1. Re:Alternative options by nathanm · · Score: 2
      Q. How do you charge it?
      It charges on household current.
      In other words: it gets most of its electricity from fossil fuel burning power plants. Now exactly how is that green?
    2. Re:Alternative options by m_chan · · Score: 2

      The original poster did not state that they were looking for a "green" solution, I did not offer that this was a "green" solution, and I am not aware of what standards are applied for a product to be considered "green". To me, the word "green" seems to be more an adjective with commensurate subjectivity rather than a measurable threshold.

      If you were referring to the web site of the vehicle rather than my brief Q&A, I agree there are some marketing generalizations and hype of the type that I ignore, but none that are patently offensive. I am not an employee of the company that makes the GEM vehicle. What I say may or may not be in line with what they would reply to the question of how is that green.

      Without reading anything more into your question, I would clarify that most power where I live is hydroelectric, which has many of its own caveats. For the sake of brevity, let's just assume that the grid from which I draw my house current is entirely fossil fuel. I would guess that the amount of fossil fuel expended to produce the power at a central facility and to distribute the power to the vehicle is less (and with better control mechanisms) than the pollution generated by an internal combustion engine used in a vehicle with similar performance characteristics plus the pollution generated in the distribution of the petroleum on which it runs.

      Whether that qualifies as a "green" solution is something I would elect to not answer, though at the risk of splitting an infinitive, perhaps it is "greener".

    3. Re:Alternative options by nathanm · · Score: 2
      I would guess that the amount of fossil fuel expended to produce the power at a central facility and to distribute the power to the vehicle is less (and with better control mechanisms) than the pollution generated by an internal combustion engine used in a vehicle with similar performance characteristics plus the pollution generated in the distribution of the petroleum on which it runs.
      Actually, with equal distance travelled, the fossil fuels burned to power the electric car will produce more pollution.
    4. Re:Alternative options by dsfox · · Score: 2

      Where does *your* electricity come from?

    5. Re:Alternative options by m_chan · · Score: 2

      Actually, with equal distance travelled, the fossil fuels burned to power the electric car will produce more pollution.

      I would be glad to read source material that you would use to support that statement.

      I take it that in effect you are stating that the total pollution generated by the (average) fossil fuel power plant to generate the electricity required for the electric vehicle I described (or an average electric vehicle, to be consistent) to be propelled one mile (or whatever arbitrary distance) is greater than the amount of pollution generated by the (average) internal combustion engine propelling the (average) gas-powered vehicle one mile (or identical arbitrary distance)? If I have misinterpreted your position, please accept my apologies.

      I have searched for information that would support your position (or my possibly mangled interpretation of it) without success except for one statement offered without support at an anti-environmental legislation website.

      My guess was based on a fair amount of reading I have done of articles that can be found in many places with a google search on keywords like ev fossil fuel power plant yielding results, such as this, that lead me to disagree with your statement, or at least for me to find it too general to effectively apply.

      If you are including total production/delivery costs of the respective power sources, I would continue to disagree with your statement.

    6. Re:Alternative options by nathanm · · Score: 2
      Where I live in MN it's about:

      50% coal

      30% hydro

      10% nuclear

      10% incinerated garbage

      Of course, I've made no claim of being green. I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of people that buy electric cars, claiming it helps reduce pollution.

    7. Re:Alternative options by m_chan · · Score: 2
      Oregon

      Electric Power Industry Generating Capability by Primary Energy Source, 1999

      Plant type: Percentage
      • Utility Production Capability
      Coal: 4.7
      Petroleum: 0
      Gas: 6.3
      Nuclear: 0
      Hydroelectric: 80.6
      Other: 0.3
      • Non-Utility Production Capability
      Coal: 0.1
      Gas: 5.1
      Petroleum/Gas Combined: 0.4
      Hydroelectric: 0.9
      Other: 1.4

      Utility and non-utility constitute 92% and 8% of total power production capability, respectively.

      Ten Largest Plants by Generating Capability, 1999

      #. Plant: Primary Energy Sources: Net Summer Capability (MW)

      1. John Day: Hydro: 2,484
      2. The Dalles: Hydro: 1,961
      3. Bonneville: Hydro: 1,212
      4. McNary: Hydro: 1,127
      5. Hermiston Generating: Gas: 552
      6. Boardman: Coal: 530
      7. Beaver: Gas: 493
      8. Hells Canyon: Hydro: 361
      9. Round Butte: Hydro: 300
      10. Oxbow: Hydro: 220

      Source: http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/st_profil es/oregon/or.html
  111. Hydro green-house gas emissions by Malc · · Score: 1

    "An electric car is not an alternative fuel unless all of the power from your grid is via solar or wind (I don't count hydro, as this usually comes from a dam that disrupted local flora/fauna). "

    Actually, hydro can be even worse than you suggest. If the resevoir behind the dam is shallow, the methane gas emissions from rotting vegetation can be quite staggering. The green house gas emissions can be higher per megawatt than from a coal-fired power station.

    1. Re:Hydro green-house gas emissions by gmhowell · · Score: 2

      Interesting. You may want to tell this guy.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    2. Re:Hydro green-house gas emissions by kevinank · · Score: 2
      Actually, hydro can be even worse than you suggest. If the resevoir behind the dam is shallow, the methane gas emissions from rotting vegetation can be quite staggering. The green house gas emissions can be higher per megawatt than from a coal-fired power station.

      At best this is highly misleading information. It is easily mitigated in a number of different ways by clearing the vegetation before flooding, by introducing nitrate eating bacteria and building an effective ecosystem in the dammed area, or even just by waiting a couple of years. It can also be solved legislatively by establishing requirements for area per depth for the construction of dams. It isn't like people want to go out and create dozens of useless shallow dams; energy generated by the dam is proportional to the depth of the dam since that determines the potential energy that is captured in the backed up water; if you only have a shallow region which could possibly be dammed you might be just as well off building a mill race and capturing kinetic rather than potential energy.

      --
      LibBT: BitTorrent for C - small - fast - clean (Now Versio
    3. Re:Hydro green-house gas emissions by mosch · · Score: 2

      The difference being that the vegetation eventually stops rotting. the coal plant continues to burn, and burn and burn.....

    4. Re:Hydro green-house gas emissions by Malc · · Score: 1

      Please check the link in this posting.

      You'll find that the methane and CO2 get produced for the life-time of the dam. Worse still, methane is 20 times more potent as a greenhouse gas than CO2. For example, the Balbina reservoir in Brazil produces 8.5 times as much CO2 per annum as a coal-fired powered station of similar generating capacity.

    5. Re:Hydro green-house gas emissions by mosch · · Score: 2
      Like so many environmentalists you take the worst-case scenario, then apply it to everything. Allow me to cite this bbbc article
      one study of nine Brazilian reservoirs found their greenhouse emissions varied per unit of electricity by a factor of 500.
      the 'worse than coal' hydroelectric plants were the ones at the top of that spectrum. This means that there are also reservoirs which generate .2% of the emissions that the high-emission reservoirs generate, which would be far, far less than any fossil fuel based plant using current technology.

      Clearly, there's no clear answer for whether or not a dam is definitely cleaner, but clearly, hydroelectric can be significantly cleaner than fossil fuels.

    6. Re:Hydro green-house gas emissions by Malc · · Score: 1

      Don't label me an "environmentalist", I'm not. You'll also see that I've already linked to that very same article in a another reply.

      If you look at my original post, my actual words were: "hydro *can* be even worse".

      I accept that it can be far cleaner too, especially considering that it doesn't put particle matter (and NO2???) in to the atmosphere. As you said, there is no clear answer, but what I was pointing out is that there are more potential issues with hydro than most people are aware of.

  112. Dah: Use Taliban & Al Queada Prisoners! by CrashVector · · Score: 0

    We've been far too restrained in this war on terrorism! Let's go conquer the Islamic world; then we can use the male slaves to haul us around in rickshaws and the female slaves, well I leave their good use to your imagination! ;)

    --Richard

    1. Re:Dah: Use Taliban & Al Queada Prisoners! by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      Naah.. Biodiesel...

  113. Why go small? by moldar · · Score: 1

    I was at a parade for the 4th of July and in the parade was an Elecric Porsche! This is a link to another person and their experiences.
    So, why not go for the best?
    No - I don't know how much Oomph the vehicle keeps

  114. More Diesel by Coilgun · · Score: 2, Informative

    As other people have mentioned, diesel is something worth looking into. The Golf TDI gets gas milage up with the hibrids, plus you get much better torque(if you ever want to tow something, etc)

    Insight:
    max torque, 89 lb-ft @ 2000 rpm w/ CVT
    max HP, 73 @ 5700 rpm

    Prius:
    max torque, 82 lb-ft @ 4200 rpm
    max HP, 98 w/ engine and motor

    Golf TDI
    max torque, 155 lb-ft @ 1900 rpm
    max HP, 90 @ 3750 rpm

    --
    That is all. Carry on. </transmission>
  115. bigger vehicles by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 2

    I would strongly consider a hybrid car, but the fact is, I can't fit in any of the ones currently out. I suppose that people who buy economy cars are the ones most likely to be interested in a hybrid, and manufacturers are starting off in that direction before moving on to other vehicle types, but are there other reasons why no hybrid vans and SUVs are in the works? Are there any problems with scaling up the technology?

    1. Re:bigger vehicles by jchristopher · · Score: 1

      Does it have to be a hybrid? The Ford Crown Victoria (a nice big car) is available in a compressed natural gas version which might work for you.

  116. Blam!! by TJ6581 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Something tell's me that evrental's potato powered webserver just learned how to make crinkle cut fries.......

    --
    "Freedom of speech has always been the abstract red-headed stepchild of the Constitution"
    -Suck
  117. My research with green cars by uglomera · · Score: 1

    I am about to buy a car myself so I want to share some links you may find useful. I will personally buy a regular Honda Civic since that's all I can afford.

    1. If you want to see the greenest cars out there, and the meanest too, check out greenercars.com

    2. If you are tight on your budget, consider getting the rare Civic HX, which has CVT transmission and is very fuel efficient. There are other makes that make cars with CVT, so you might want to look around.

    3. Check out the site for compressed-air cars. Sounds funny, but they are already into production.

    4. About the Honda Insight. I would seriously consider a Civic Hybrid instead. The Insight is definitely not comfortable, but ranks first on greenercars.com. Another thing about the Insight is that it is a very "political" car. Honda loses about $1000 on every Insight it sells. Just imagine the ad fees that you'll be charged if you buy one. Therefore, I won't be surprised if this model is discontinued after a few years. The Civic, on the other hand, is a much better competitor to the Prius and is definitely here to stay.

    Good luck with getting a green car! We need more people like you and not the drive-an-11mpg-SUV people. :)

  118. Get a RAV4 EV! by cdaveb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You've missed one of the best options currently on the market for electric car shoppers in California- Toyota has made the RAV4 EV available to the general public for lease or purchase (previously it was only available to fleets). I got one a few months ago and it's been great. Gets 80-100 miles range, max speed 78mph, has a backseat unlike the EV1. I miss my EV1, but the RAV4 EV is a pretty good car and I think it's the only compelling pure electric currently on the market for the general public. The one annoying part is that the RAV4 EV uses a small paddle charger, and there aren't as many of those as the large paddle ones that the EV1 uses. I've never needed public charging myself, but I don't know if that's an issue for you. I suggest checking with Toyota of Palo Alto about the car- they are one of the best RAV4 EV dealers in the area and know their stuff better than most.

    On a semi-related note, in response to all those Slashdot readers who keep spouting the same crap everytime an electric car comes into discussion- yes electrics are cleaner even if you do have fuels like coal as the source (which is not a significant part of the power mix in CA) because it is much easier to clean fuel at one place than in every vehicle, and if you want to calculate environmental effects of the production of fuel, don't forget all the effects of making gas . Additionally, if you have the option of selecting your power source like we did (we chose Commonwealth Energy) you can in fact get your power from clean sources.

    1. Re:Get a RAV4 EV! by jchristopher · · Score: 1
      You've missed one of the best options currently on the market for electric car shoppers in California- Toyota has made the RAV4 EV available to the general public for lease or purchase (previously it was only available to fleets). I got one a few months ago and it's been great.

      So how much? Don't leave us hanging! Leasing one sounds especially attractive since as the batteries improve, you just turn it in and get something else.

    2. Re:Get a RAV4 EV! by cdaveb · · Score: 1

      It's 42k for purchase (not cheap, but no pure electrics are). But there are incentives available to lower the price. CA has a 3k a year for 3 yrs program for purchasing electrics, which brings it down 9k. Additionally there is a federal tax credit I hear for 4k which only applies to purchases. Personally I did a 4 yr lease because I figure by that time there should hopefully be more clean fuel options in the market, and if not I can pay the residual and keep the car.

  119. high mileage doesn't require a hybrid (Honda) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One note - a lot of mileage comes from driving style. I have a Honda Civic EX Coupe (EPA 29/35, I believe). This car has 127hp, and is fully driveable in heavy city driving (at least with the standard). When driving on the highway...
    1) with cruise control on
    2) at around 60-65 mph (under 3k rpm)
    3) with the windows only partway down or up (and sunroof closed or tilted up) ...I routinely get about 51-53 mph, which is far above rated. (And bear in mind that this is the highest hp civic from the year, '99, other than the performance Si.) And I feed it the recommended (low, 87) octane.

    In city, I tend to get 26-30, but my city driving style is more likely to involve hard acceleration. (Also, driving without A/C may not be an option for some climates. With A/C, but all of the other conditions listed above, I tend to get 38-42 highway reliably.)

  120. ADM by CrashVector · · Score: 1


    Ethanol is a good idea, but I do feel compelled to point out that Archer Daniels Midland is both an Agro-Dictator AND an Agro-Baron!!!!

    --Richard

  121. So you feel better about yourself.... by talks_to_birds · · Score: 1, Troll
    by burning coal in a powerplant in somebody else's backyard than burning a very modest amount of gasoline on the street you live on?

    Goody for you!

    We're just so-so eco-logical!

    feh..

    t_t_b

    --
    I'm on PJ's "enemies" list! Are you?
    1. Re:So you feel better about yourself.... by TheKey · · Score: 1

      Hm. You do know that hybrids use just gasoline and nothing else? Basically fuel efficient vehicles.

      --
      My Journal - 1,337 fans and countin
  122. Any longdistance drving? by tutal · · Score: 1

    If you plan on doing any long distance driving the Civic GX is definately not the car for you as most of the country does not have these special stations (I'm near the chicago area).

    The Toyota, although it has the lowest fuel efficiency, is the more spacious than the Insight. It is also a safer car (assuming you drive on the freeway), which is very important.

    I would never recommend the Insight, it is a terrible car considering the alternatives.

    Another couple options are the Civic Hybrid (which uses unleaded gas), great mileage, reliability of a Civic, safety of a sedan, and spacious enough to haul a couple weeks worth of luggage for four (depending on how heavily you pack). Also there are going to be more hybrid SUV's and other larger vehicles: Ford HEV-2003, as well as a Saturn SUV-2004, Chevy Pickup-2004, Suburban-2005, and Dodge Ram Pickup-2005 , which will be great for those of us who want a bigger, safer car, while being good stewards of our environment.

    Then there's my favorite, a Trek Bike.

  123. Dilbert's ride by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the Dilbert animated cartoon, he drove what looked like an EV1. Of course, it was equipped with the "Traffic Eliminator" missile launcher, an option that I have yet to find on any car, hybrid or otherwise.

  124. here's an alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    --pick out an older but nice car that you like, and have it converted to cng "city gas". Most large municipal gas suppliers will do it or recommend which mechanic they use. I was living in atlanta until 4 years ago, atlanta gas light offered that service. Yes, it costs some scratch, around 3 grand total from what I remember, but you can have it done to a used vehicle, so save money that way. They even come to your home and install the 'filler up" assembly. The engines run real clean so they last longer, it's very good quality fuel, domestically produced, and by retrofitting you can pick out whichever vehicle you want.

    and cool beans for putting your money where your ecological interests are. I don't own a throwdown dual althon 2 ghz 500 meg 4 dimensional video card "game" machine, but I DO own solar pv panels and etc and run on solar. I vote with my wallet as well. good luck to you!

  125. Re:Jetta TDI has better mileage by Tom+Bombadill · · Score: 1

    TDIs do in fact have the best mileage.
    Numerous real-world tests revealed that the TDI consitently turns in better mileage.

    My Golf (now gone in favor of my 325iX ) got as high as 54 and never lower than 46 and I drove it HARD.

  126. Honda Civic Hybrid by nvrrobx · · Score: 1

    Honda now makes a Civic hybrid (competitor to the Prius) - it's just a Honda Civic with a hybrid engine.

    Details can be found at http://civichybrid.honda.com/

    I personally think it's a much more attractive choice than the other options :)

  127. HOV Lane Access by jchristopher · · Score: 1
    Almost every poster is overlooking that the original question is being asked by someone in California. There are lots of things you can get away with elsewhere (converting your own car, etc.) that won't fly here.

    We have a special program that allows you to operate certain vehicles in the carpool lanes, even as a single driver! This should not be overlooked because it's a huge benefit in San Francisco or Los Angeles to be able to use the carpool lanes. The catch is that not all vehicles qualify - in fact, of the vehicles listed by the original poster, only the natural gas Civic GX would qualify.

    More information is available from the NGV.ORG Incentives page which provides a listing of tax benefits, rebates, and other incentives for natural gas vehicles.

    The hybrid vehicles being mentioned by other posters DO NOT quality for this program, despite being extremely low emissions vehicles.

  128. The Green Book by Seanasy · · Score: 2

    Comparison and environmental ratings of vehicles: http://www.greenercars.com/online.html

    1. Re:The Green Book by Quila · · Score: 2

      $8.95 just to look up a few cars online? Are these guys nuts? That's why eco-friendly things rarely work in the real world, because many eco-people seem to have no grasp of economics or human nature. There are so few eco-people in the world, they can't make a difference -- the need is to convert the average person. In this case, we're trying to get the average person to look at buying greener cars. Not many are going to do that for $8.95, mainly the already converted will.

  129. Re:Question for Submitter: How many miles on Accor by ktulu1115 · · Score: 1

    169,182 miles. 95 EX. Still going strong, only major repair was to replace original clutch around 140,000 miles. I certainly don't complain about the 30 mpg either. :)

    --
    # fuser -v /dev/attention | grep work
    #
  130. This would be worse for the environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've read that the human body's methane emissions are more harmful that most gasoline engines, when you compare them doing the same amount of work.

  131. Volkswagen Diesel by t0ph3rus · · Score: 2, Informative

    I drove a Golf Turbo Diesel from London to Edinburgh and back. I loved the engine on it. The golf got superb gas mileage. It also had great acceleration. They aren't joking when the name "turbo" diesel. I plan on buying a turbo diesel when I get back to the States. You can get the Golf, Jetta, and Beetle with a turbo diesel. I would highly recomend a tried and true diesel engine that gets great pickup over a new and untested hybrid or alternative fuel engine. Also, you should consider the body. A diesel engine can cary a conventional body frame. The hybrind and Alternate fuel engines use all sort of weight saving measures in the body to increase efficiency. In the long run a sturdy body will hold up longer. If you aren't planning on keeping the car for very long then why even get a fuel efficent car? After all you only see the savings in TCO after a few years.

  132. Internal combustion isn't dead yet by cygnus · · Score: 2

    The Volkswagen TDI engine (turbo direct injection diesel) gets about 49 mpg city. it's the most fuel-efficent non-hybrid internal combustion engine on the market. here's some linkage for you.

    --
    Just raise the taxes on crack.
  133. Several options for you by ecloud · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Here are some links for you:

    Toyota RA4 EV - yes it's an SUV but the NiMH batteries are supposed to last 100,000 miles, maintenance free; and it gets 126 miles to the charge; and it has all the creature comforts. I think it's kindof ironic all this high-tech stuff is being put in an SUV. Just think how much better the range would be if they'd put the same powertrain in a sports car with good drag coefficient and low frontal area. But, as far as I can tell this is the best new EV that you can actually buy right now. Only in California, unfortunately. I presume for charging it uses the GM paddle system like your EV1 but haven't confirmed that.

    You could just get a used one on ebay; I was very tempted to bid on this but decided to wait on an electric for now. Here's an electric S10 pickup. I test drove one of these once; it's a lot like an EV1, same technology in a pickup. Supposedly you can buy these in California too, but I'm not sure whether new or used. Otherwise they tend to show up as surplus from electric-company fleet programs now and then.

    How has your service from GM been? I was tempted to buy one of these S10s but I figured GM has been acting like they want to forget that they ever had electric cars, so what are the chances of getting good service 5 or 10 years from now? And these things are too complicated to fix yourself, probably. Whatcha gonna do if the inverter fails? AC drives are not common in conversion EVs, and tend to be rather pricey.

    Finally, if you're not on the EV mailing list, you should be. You will get a ton of good advice there; most of the subscribers are hard-core electric vehicle hobbyists who build their own conversions at home.

    And congratulations on having a brain and being willing to put up with all the stupid naysayers out there, or the ones who keep repeating the same tired old objections about powerplants using fossil fuels (nevermind that they do it so much more efficiently than even the best IC engine) or "why don't you connect a generator to the wheels and make your own electricity." I'm always surprised how otherwise seemingly-smart people will laugh at you when you mention something about electric vehicles. Every new technology has to have its pioneers. And in the long term the earth isn't giving us much choice about switching away from fossil fuels anyway. This is why I do not advocate hybrid vehicles. You can conserve gas with those, but I think in any conceivable future there will always be some alternative way to generate electricity, so maybe electric cars are here to stay in one form or another.

    1. Re:Several options for you by Winged+Cat · · Score: 1

      It doesn't use the EV-1's paddle system. Can't. EV-1 is inductive charging, RAV4-EV is conductive.

  134. Get a bike. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2

    Turn your extra calories into an alternate fuel...

  135. I guess that's what it all comes down to. by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2

    You bring up a very good point.

    In particular my friends are comparing the durability of a civic vs any of the V8 based Ford Mustangs produced from 1987 to current.

    We all tend to agree that Hondas do indeed last forever when driven under normal conditions.

    However, where we tend to disagree is that they claim that racing a Honda and a Mustang under semi-abusive conditions, the Honda will still outlast the Mustang.

    I'm going off of personal experience driving Mustangs (never driving Hondas) but I've torn down motors that have been well-maintained with 150,000+ miles on them only to find that they still bear the original factory cross hatch on the cylinder walls and the cranks only need polishing and no grinding.

    I guess in general, most motors will do quite well if you take care of them.

    Thanks for the info though! Much appreciated!

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  136. And motorcycles? by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    in fact i believe it has the best mileage for any vehicle that still uses a fossil fuel of any sort.

    My Suzuki motorcyle would get over 50MPG on the highway (as long as I kept it under 85mph). Even the Honda Goldwings with the 1.6L engines were rated at 50MPG on the highway. Many mopeds and scooters get even higher mileage, some in the 100MPG range. Of these, some don't qualify to be ridden on an interstate, but most are vehicles that require plates and license to operate.

    eCycle (oops, is that a deep link?) is working on a hybrid motorcycle that gets 180MPG (using diesel by the way). Pretty cool machine, I'd love to try one out, but with a top speed of 80, it would barely keep up with traffic on NY/NJ highways...

    --
    -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
    1. Re:And motorcycles? by ALAUser · · Score: 1

      I find over the same commute that I get better mileage with my Jetta TDI than I do with my Kawasaki Vulcan 800. The fuel is cheaper, too. Of course the bike is more fun...

  137. Five? passenger by ek_adam · · Score: 1

    Have you ever tried to fit three people into the backseat of one of these? For a five hour drive?

    I'm currently investigating minivans. (Try fitting two baby seats and a grownup into the back seat of any economy sedan.) Does anyone know of any high efficiency diesel minivans? There's a station with biodiesel not far from my house.

  138. I am in almost exactly the same situation by Winged+Cat · · Score: 2

    I also drive an EV1 in the SF Bay Area, and my lease is expiring in 6 months, so I have to start looking for another car. According to Saturn, GM has officially sent no word on renewing the leases, which in practice means they won't renew them. They do offer lease assumption programs, for you to take over a lease from someone else, but that only lasts 'til the lease runs out. (And, frankly, given how GM has killed the EV1 - saying they had no customers when they had waiting lists several months long, and simply refusing to manufacture enough to meet demand so they could say they only sold a few thousand without saying they only built a few thousand - makes me think twice about continuing to support them.)

    The option I am leaning towards is Toyota's RAV4-EV. Top speed 78 MPH, range 125 miles. It reportedly leases for $477/month, a bit less than an EV-1. Sure, it's an SUV and not a sedan, but there aren't that many options for pure electrics under your criteria (which are similar to my own) if you're just a member of the general public, not managing a fleet of cars or something.

    You know I'll be monitoring this topic too, to see what my own options are...

    1. Re:I am in almost exactly the same situation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One thing I really hate is niggers. I also hate faggots. Homo niggers
      are the worst. They are scum and should be dealt with harshly.

  139. Buy a Ford Expedition by thelizman · · Score: 1

    ...and convert it to hydrogen. It appears you already have had the courage to be a pioneering consumer when you bought what was widely suspected to be an electric lemon. Unfortunately, just because your car doesn't put out any emissions doesn't mean the power plant it gets its electricity from doesn't put out any, so you you're essentially hiding in one part of the energy chain and ignoring the other.

    The only other compromise is to get a hybrid and convert it to CNG for the lowest possible emissions.

    Now if you'll excuse me, I have to get my bike tires refilled.

    1. Re:Buy a Ford Expedition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now call me alarmist, but wouldn't it take a lot of energy to convert an entire Ford Expedition to Hydrogen?

      Oh to BURN Hydrogen... I thought...

      Well it would be a good thing to do to a Ford Expedition anyway...

    2. Re:Buy a Ford Expedition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of Fords and hydrogen, take a look at http://www.futuretruck.org/
      This past Spring, 15 teams competed against each other in order to see who could do the best job of converting a Ford Explorer into an HEV. The competition was headed by Ford and sponsored by Argonne National Laboratory and Cisco (to name a few). One of the trucks actually *beat* the stock Explorer in acceleration times, and all of the vehicles hurdled over the stock Explorer with regard to emissions. Two of the HEVs implemented fuel cell technology, thereby bringing emissions down to 0%! Wow.

      Michael

  140. Re:Jetta TDI has better mileage by Dastardly · · Score: 1

    This comes down to define "cleaner".

    Diesel generally has more particulate emissions, on the other hand you use a lot less per mile driven. So, take the jetta example, a jetta unleaded 4 might get 30 miles/gallon, but the jetta TDI gets 50 miles per gallon. So, for every 50 miles driven the unleaded puts out 1.67 gallons worth of emissions vs the 1 gallon worth the diesel.

    So, then the question is whether you would rather have 1 gallon worht of diesel emissions or 1.6 gallaons worth of unleaded emission?

  141. Forget Alternative Fuel Vehicles... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your simple contribution will mean nothing until the government mandates the gas-guzzling motors are outlawed.

    Until such time, you're merely making it inconvenient for yourself to get around. Get a Corvette. :)

    Want to feel good? Plant a tree.......

  142. Pure electric cars/ZEVs by User0x45 · · Score: 0

    The State of California passed legislation in 1993 mandating that all dealers in California must have a ZEV (Zero Emmission Vehicle) available within ten years(2003). The manufacturers have fought this all the way to the top.

    In preparation for actually having to have ZEVs they are getting prototypes out on the road. One prototype is the Ford Think City.

    The Ford company does not seem to want to sell these, it is as if they will not make them available unless they are forced. There are a few dozen prototypes currently on the road, and Ford has talked about a launch on (conviniently) January 2003 right when the law might come into effect. These ZEVs, if they are let loose into the streets of California just may become popular, and that would be hard on the oil industry companies etc.

    In case they are forced to release ZEVs they do have them ready, as do other manufacturers. So you might want to wait until January 2003, and a whole load of new ZEV might be available in California. Unless of course the courts throw out the legislation at the last moment.

    Think Mobility

    1. Re:Pure electric cars/ZEVs by SSRSSR · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, it's worse that this. GM has a wonderful electric vehicle called the EV1. It's fast, cool, and goes 100+ miles on a charge. But, they were available for lease only, only in CA, and now that the leases are expiring, GM is collecting them to crushed! This is not a joke. Check out the EV list http://groups.yahoo.com/group/evlist/ for e-mail from people who actually know this. There are many people on the waiting list to just lease these who will never get a chance. In the past, some auto makers have produced these types of cars, made them lease only, only to discontinue them, and claim that nobody wants them! This total baloney, but is probably what is going to happen with the GM EV1.

  143. Re:Why do you think electricity is better than fue by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

    The theory is that electrical producers, being centrally located (and regulated) and large, can reduce the amount of pollution per kilowatt by improved processes and scale. There is some research on this and IIRC the conclusion is that there is a small net reduction in greenhouse gases, but definitely look it up.

    As far as practicality goes, I still feel biodiesel's a good alternative, especially for larger vehicles and power generation.

    All I can say is, I put my $$$ where my mouth is.. No biodiesel-touting 15mpg-SUV-driving hypocrite me ;)

  144. coal is burnt to charge your battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    these all electric cars are no more enviromentaly freindly than standard cars because coal is usually what the power plants use to generate the electricity to power your car.

  145. If true... by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 2

    Then I'm waiting for a Jetta TDI *hybrid*.

    Since the Civic and Insight are gasolene hybrids, and a conventional Civic gets about ~30mpg -> ~50mpg, a TDI might get much better mileage with a hybrid electric system.

    But in the meantime I'm considering the Civic because it gets more horsepower for only slightly less mileage.

  146. Speed by stud9920 · · Score: 1
    speed (>=65 mph)
    What happens when you drop under 65 mph ? Does it explode ?
  147. Pure Electric, Bad!.....Hybrid, Good! by nexthec · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And the reasoning is somthing more sociological than scientific. Pure Electric is all fine and dandy in theory. However, lets through in the the human factor, and because California (read LA and Area)is pushing these vehicles the most, we will use that portion of the world. And for people, the DINC, because they are the most likeley to be purchasing an new car.

    The Idea is that everyone will recharge at night and, drive to work, finish recharging, then go home and be used to fill local high deman areas. Unfortunaly, what happened almost all of the time is that people go home, at about 5 o'clock, and plug in their cars, and start charging them, so that they can go out that night and do the movie thing, the bar scene, or whatever. Now you have the largest peak consumption time in the day growing to an even higher peak. This ofcourse has made the power transmission/generation shith their collective nickers. This makes the problimatic california even more so. This is one of the reason the major companies have stopped pushing it.

    This still dosent bother CARB, even though the most in-efficeint sources are used at peak loads. These sources would be coal-fired steam plants in wyoming. Which is fine for california, they have moved their pollution across state lines.

    The key is using state of the art stuff and non petrolium sources in conjunction. Current market level stuff uses brushless DC drives...ICK! Now here is some truely cool stuff.

  148. Nissan Sentra CA by guido_sst · · Score: 1

    Have you considered the Nissan Sentra CA? It's the cleanest gasoline-powered vehicle in the world and qualifies as a SULEV under CARB specifications. http://www.nissandriven.com/insideNissan/LookingAh eadArticle/0,9401,533,00.html

  149. Hacking the Prius by Ellen+Spertus · · Score: 2

    I hadn't known about hacking the Prius. That is way cool. With the information in your message, I found this page on the MP3/CD hack Thank you.

  150. How about this for a question? by Proc6 · · Score: 1
    "Can anyone recommend an alternative fuel source car that won't taco like a bicycle wheel in even a minor collision?"

    I mean seriously, is your life worth a few mpg of gas? The hybrid and electric cars Ive seen would crumple at the hands of a shopping cart, let alone a head on collision with an Escalade. 80 mpg is great, but I wouldnt feel safe in one of those things on the highway.

    --

    I'm Rick James with mod points biatch!

  151. Re:Jetta TDI has better mileage by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 2

    The problem is that in the two cars cited, they can both average 50mpg...

    So if a Civic hybrid and the Jetta TDI can both hit 50mpg, then the Jetta will have more particulate emissions than the Civic...

    Me, I'm waiting for a TDI hybrid for the best of both worlds...

  152. Air Powered Car! by brgomeistr · · Score: 1

    Why not try a car powered by compressed air.

    It looks like MDI is finally rolling these machines into production. They have a range of 120 miles, (or 10 hours in urban conditions) and have a top speed of 60-75 MPH. I remember reading about this technology in WIRED a few years ago, and it looks like it might be ready to go!

    --

    void theoremProver(){
    print "this product is correct"
    }
  153. Uh...Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do you think you need to pay more and get an unsafe smaller vehicle? Just because we can't argue with the SUV's crowd doesn't mean you have to go solo. I plan on driving more and using the equivalent amount of fuel as an SUV's with my compact car. Let's drive the gas price up together. Don't be a fool, buy a big SUV.

  154. Re:Ethanol is no solution, it's part of the proble by otis+wildflower · · Score: 2, Informative

    Almost....

    Ethanol can be made from feed grain waste (when grains are raised for vitamins/minerals and the starch is discarded), and there's a net gain of ~16000 btu according to DOAg..

    http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,46045- 2, 00.html

    Still, E85 can't be used in most auto engines: it's too corrosive. Cars that can use E85 typically state it in the owner's manual or somewhere...

  155. Re:Jetta TDI has better mileage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The TDI engine also has supposedly cleaner emissions than a standard diesel engine. This is because the air is injected in a way that makes it swirl. Thus, the fuel will mix faster with the air as it is injected, leading to a more complete burn. This means cleaner emissions and better fuel economy (which also leads to cleaner emissions).

  156. Re:How about a Smart Car? Oh wait... this is the U by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Backwaters of the world? Would that be France and Italy, where they still haven't figured out that communism doesn't work?

  157. actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    --actually, the hybrid cars are being dumped on the market at extremely below cost of manufacture. The prius is runnihng around 40 to 50 grand I think to just build the things, but they are looking for long term brand loyalty and market share, just like when they flooded the US market with 4 cylinder vehicles in the 70's. Those were sold at a loss as well for a long time. So you are actually getting a pretty good deal at 20 grand and change for a hybrid.

  158. Too bad... by mtrupe · · Score: 1

    To bad they can't make a car that is powered by all the tree huggers' sense of self satisfaction.

    The sucker would do 0-60 in .5 seconds and drive forever.

    1. Re:Too bad... by doppleganger871 · · Score: 1

      I'll keep driving my Bronco. Anything less than 8 cylinders isn't a complete engine, anything more is a bonus. :)

    2. Re:Too bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to be a 'tree hugger' as you called it. Now I gave up because I can't win. I leave my A/C on all day long and planning to triple my energy use. Let's ruin it together.

    3. Re:Too bad... by night_flyer · · Score: 2

      anything less than 350CID isnt a real engine :)

      --


      Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
      Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
  159. Rav4 EV by jeebee · · Score: 1

    Since you're already used to electric vehicles, have you considered the Rav4 EV? The website is not very informative, and apparently the car is only available in California.

    1. Re:Rav4 EV by jeebee · · Score: 1

      Actually, there is a bit more information on the website here. The Rav4 EV has a top speed of 78 mph and a range of 126 miles. It's a bit pricey, though: over $40,000. There is a $9000 rebate, though, and the home charging station is included in that price tag (but I imagine you already have one of those for your EV-1).

  160. Link to PriusMods discussion by Ellen+Spertus · · Score: 2
  161. 80 MpG for 14000$ : Volkswagen Lupo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want an affordable car wich is very efficient you should consider an VW Lupo 3L TDI
    "3l" is for 3 Litres on 100 kilometers.
    It runs on normal Diesel fuel and has as almost any modern Diesel from Europe much less emmisions than a normal car.
    It uses a Catalytic Converter and an additional exhaust filter. That means NO measurable emmisions besides Carbondioxyde and Water.
    At least here in Europe Diesel is much cheaper than normal fuel and you have to pay no taxes on the Car.
    You also have enough room to transport four adults, and a state of the art Protection System is also included.

  162. DOE site by bluegreenone · · Score: 1

    This DOE site has a good amount of information about fuel-efficient cars. Among other things there is a list of this model year's hybrid cars.

  163. Don't forget to look at long term solutions by Silas · · Score: 2
    All of the replies to this thread are great - I'm glad to see people encouraging alternative fuel sources for cars, given all of the environmental, political, and financial benefits. I'll add a link to the Grassroots Biodesel and Vegetable Oil Fuel site, run by the folks living at an awesome ecovillage in northwest Missouri.

    But beyond that, I just wanted to encourage folks to consider long-term solutions that don't necessarily involve buying the right car. If you have to buy a car now, go for it, but maybe as a part of that process you could take some time to write a letter to your government representative encouraging investment in mass transit, bicycle infrastructure (bike lanes, etc), and more broad support for environmentally friendly transportation methods (on land, air, and sea).

    The energy and resources devoted to producing cars, even eco-friendly ones, and the infrastructure that supports them is still very significant in an unsustainable sort of way, and we won't be any better off in 20 years if we're all just solo drivers of SUVs that happen to be running on biodiesel.

    Also, if you're going to join a motorist club, don't join AAA, use an org like Better World. Better World provides all the same features, but unlike AAA, they don't actively oppose funding for mass transit, clean air regulations, bike paths, etc.

  164. Re:Jetta TDI has better mileage by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

    So, then the question is whether you would rather have 1 gallon worht of diesel emissions or 1.6 gallaons worth of unleaded emission?

    If you care about the local environment, go with the Gas: it produces less NOx and soot, which contribute to local smog.

    If you care about the global environment, go with the Diesel: it produces less CO2 and other greenhouse gases.

    Oh well.. :/

  165. Propane? by Piper82 · · Score: 1

    Where I live in Canada, Propane is widely used as an alternative fuel, mostly by fleet vehicles. It's readily available and cheap. I don't know the specifics on how it compares environmentally to gasoline or diesel, but I believe it's very favourable, similar to natural gas (emissions wise). You can expect to get about 2/3's the range you would with gasoline.

  166. So many cars by Jordy · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    The world is neither black nor white nor good nor evil, only many shades of CowboyNeal.
  167. HEMP Biodiesel fuel car tours Japan -- WORKING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is a link to an alternative fuel car that uses biodiesel fuel made from the hemp plant.

    http://www.hempcar.org

  168. Let them eat Cake! by Monthenor · · Score: 2

    You should get Satan as your motor.

    --
    Co-founder of GerbilMechs
  169. More poillution than a Hybrid ... by CDWert · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You gotta love people that dont have a clue,
    PURE electrics are responsible for the generation of more polution than comprable hybrid vehicles.

    No ? Just look around at EV sites and it wont take you long to realized that generating electricity at a plant ??? miles away, transmission loss and all the fun add up to MORE FRIGGING polution in the generation of that electricity than a hybrid creates.

    Not to metnion the long term battery and chemical disposal issues. Thats a whopper too.

    Wait for one of the Borax Powered Hydrogen Fuel cell vehicles from Chrysler. Cost is supposed to be low, and emission zero.

    Barring that look at some of the hybrid vehicles.

    Sometimes I have to question peoples motives of EV , if its convinience thats OK, my neighbor has been using the same elctric lawn mower for 20 years, its easy, quiet cheap, the only thing he spends money on is a new extension cord every 3 years or so after he's chopped his umpteen times. If you are looking at an EV for enviromental reasons, PLEASE get a clue. PURE EV pollute more than hybrids, and some more than LEV.

    My favorite action by an enviromental group was the guys in Calif, that burned an allotment down under construction. POINTS , 1 for burning, 2 like inscurance isnt going to pay and end up cutting more trees to rebuild ? 3, the fumes from all the insulation cooking ? 4 we deforest more area to rebuild an allotment "TREE HUGGERS" were protesting the cutting of trees ?

    I would seriously wait for the Chryslers to be sold they seem AWFULL SLICK !

    http://www.popsci.com/popsci/auto/article/0,1254 3, 212456,00.html

    If you havent seen or heard about it ....

    --
    Sig went tro...aahemmm.....fishing........
    1. Re:More poillution than a Hybrid ... by Junta · · Score: 2

      An interesting point most people never consider about pure electric cars, but I would think there are more factors here than meets the eye. (Of course I am by no means an expert, this stuff is just my logical reasoning).

      The whole concept of hybrid cars that run completely on gasoline, using gasoline to charge the batteries as needed shows the inefficiency of traditional combustion engines. If there is so much energy being put out that storing it enables a battery to be charged and get beter mileage, it means the energy usage of the actual engine is more efficient. This translates to less energy being wasted/expended, so while energy would be lost in transmission to refueling stations, the energy waste on the road might more than make up for it....

      Also, at a power plant, I would think principles of mass production apply here. True most are still burning something to get energy, but by processing so much at once and having more sophisticated and maintained equipment, I would think a power plant would also be more efficient at energy conversion than a single, potentially badly tuned combustion engine working on a small amount of fuel. If this is true and by itself compensated for transmission loss, then hybrids would be worse than electric cars that also operate on small amounts of fuel at a time using less maintained equipment. Also, the energy plant nearby has a rare chance of being a geothermal, hydroelectric, or solar plant, all of which are environmentally friendly. Some electric cars have solar cells to help the battery keep going too. There are a fair number of nuclear plants out there as well, which burn much less fuel, produce little atmospheric waste, but leaves the horrible side effect of radioactive waste.... Personally, I'd love energy plants to move more toward hydroelectric, geothermal, and solar with some sort of fusion and perhaps solar power collected outside the atmosphere, but those dreams are far off....

      So in the end, I'm not sure what the most environmentally friendly solution is, but the problem is not as simple as you say, there are so many factors. The same amount of useful energy is always consumed, but the waste to get there varies greatly depending on the extraction method.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    2. Re:More poillution than a Hybrid ... by M-G · · Score: 2

      Wait for one of the Borax Powered Hydrogen Fuel cell vehicles from Chrysler. Cost is supposed to be low, and emission zero.

      We'll see. Right now the NaBH4 process is horribly expensive and inefficient. Millenium Cell has claimed to have created a new process that fixes all the problems, but they won't say anything until their patents are secured.

      And the system isn't borax-powered...borax is basically the waste product. The power comes from the hydrogen attached to the borax, which the system removes for energy. Now we're back to the same problem...we need to get the hyrdrogen from somewhere, which requires energy, and we need to tack it onto the borax, which requires energy...

      The Millenium Cell folks claim they'll have the total system efficiency to be as good as or better than gasoline...we'll see.

    3. Re:More poillution than a Hybrid ... by I_am_God_Here · · Score: 1

      Actually I have seen lots and lots of numbers by various places, including the EPA, that state a pure electric pollutes more per mile then a pure gas. Though a hybrid bets them both by capturing lots of lost energy.

      Everyone would love to see more solar plants but they forget that solar plants simply don't work on the large scale in the north. And as for wind power, have you ever seen flocks of birds fly through these "wind farms"? No you haven't because these wind farms wipeout entire flocks.

      Clean energy is a nice dream and a good goal but something that can't be forced.

      --

      Capitalism: unequal distribution of wealth
      Socialism: equal distribution of poverty
    4. Re:More poillution than a Hybrid ... by Jordy · · Score: 2
      You gotta love people that dont have a clue,
      PURE electrics are responsible for the generation of more polution than comprable hybrid vehicles.

      No ? Just look around at EV sites and it wont take you long to realized that generating electricity at a plant ??? miles away, transmission loss and all the fun add up to MORE FRIGGING polution in the generation of that electricity than a hybrid creates.
      You do realize that oil isn't pulled from the ground at your local gas station and there is considerable amount of pollution involved in transporting it to said gas station right?

      The type of power plant that generates your electricity is also a factor.

      In California (the largest market for EVs in the US), air polluting power constitutes 62.6% (CA 2001 power mix numbers) of the power used. However, 50% of that are natural gas power plants and are more efficient than your gas based car. 11% of that is coal, but that is down several percent over the year 2000 numbers.

      The rest of the power, 37.4% is clean and that number keeps going up every day.

      So no, EV cars in fact do not pollute as much as traditional gas cars or even diesel and fuel cell based electrics look even more promising.
      --
      The world is neither black nor white nor good nor evil, only many shades of CowboyNeal.
    5. Re:More poillution than a Hybrid ... by CDWert · · Score: 2

      WOW, thats interesting, here Coal is responsible for some 70% of power production, no wonder were know as the Acid Rain state, heh, then again at least our rivers and lakes quit catching fire....(for those that dont know some 30 years back, the Cuyohoga river and parts of LK Erie were SO polluted they would actually ignite and burn (well solvents etc in the water would)

      Your logic is sound for the Californa Market, The cracking of crude is not a very thermally expensive process however. It can be dirty but generally isnt as much, It is cheaper and more efficinent to builf the fractioning systems in a heat efficent manner, this in turn reduced the emmisions of the refinment process.

      Truth be known Im all for SNAP powered cars. But hey I dont see the NRC letting your average citizen hurdle down the highway with that much plutonium or strontium or cobalt 90 around while jabbering on their cell phones.

      From Ohio I speak

      --
      Sig went tro...aahemmm.....fishing........
    6. Re:More poillution than a Hybrid ... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Yes Pure EV used like the typical overpaid, wasteful, rich american would is very very bad.

      A good human/american would have their EV charged by their windmill and PV array.. thus making the EV very very Green.

      please... dont group all EV with the rich trying to be eco-trendy.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    7. Re:More poillution than a Hybrid ... by silverhalide · · Score: 1

      While EVs may be producing more pollution by your numbers, there are many other things to consider. EVs run off of electricity that is centrally produced. This is often accomplished more efficently than doing it on a per-car basis. The best part about EVs is that they can take advantage of nuclear power (which is the most environmentally friendly if you contain the waste properly). Now granted, the major problem with EVs is that they have battery disposal problems (lead-acid batteries are difficult to get rid of), but once better battery technology rolls around, EVs just might be the answer. Don't forget that EVs require much fewer auxillary fluids such as engine oil and antifreeze, and they waste much less power in heat compared to their internal combustion counterparts. A typical EV is somewhere between 80-90% efficent from the energy in the pack to the energy in the wheels, where as your BEST internal combustion systems are 30-40% efficent at converting the energy in gas to power at the wheels.

      You can skew the numbers any way you want, but the main idea is to get rid of our dependence on oil so the terrorists don't have any more funding!

    8. Re:More poillution than a Hybrid ... by Junta · · Score: 2

      I actually never mentioned the wind power,but I would guess a hydro plant would have similar consequences for fish.

      As to the solar power issue, I am aware of the problems for most of the earth, but perhaps technology will get to the point where we can harvest solar panels in space and get it down to earth efficiently....

      I guess the only current 'clean' power without ecological side effects would be geothermal energy, but that is extraordinarily limited..

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    9. Re:More poillution than a Hybrid ... by scharkalvin · · Score: 0

      Hybrids still team an inefficent internal combustion engine that generates large amounts of pollution with an efficent electric power plant. Size matters. A central power plant can generate electricy more efficently than the power plant inside a hybrid. Even if you include the loss in transmitting the power from the plant to your car. If you put hydro, wind or solar power plants on the grid things look better. The only real pollution issue with an EV is the batteries. Perhaps a recyclable battery can be developed?
      Sorry I think your logic is wrong here, but it's good to thing outside the box for a change. Maybe a hydrogen powered hybrid would be a better idea, only H2O as an exhaust.

    10. Re:More poillution than a Hybrid ... by CDWert · · Score: 2

      Something interesting,

      Back in the late 18 early 1900's STEAM itself was considered a pollutant.

      Mass dischage of water vapor makes for a VERY nast enviromental hazzard, in many cities, there were MAJOR condensate problems , expecially in the winter.

      Lung disorders increases in pneumonnia. Mixture of the vapor with other pollutants creating acids, etc.

      Better run one hell of a condenser on the thing.
      But at that you WILL lose some efficeny, either from flow reduction or a thermal related efficeny loss.

      Tricky business.....

      --
      Sig went tro...aahemmm.....fishing........
  170. Honda Civic GX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tried the Toyota Prius; and it is +/- nice, but too expensive for what it brings. They could have done a little bit of a better job by getting a nicer radio.

    I would go with the "Honda Civic GX." It is pretty much a normal Honda Civic with the added bonus without loosing much.

    I don't believe there should be any reason why environmental friendly cars shouldn't be comfortable enough as regular cars. Not that they will have the same equipment, but that they could have equivalent lighter stuff, instead.

  171. My Audi runs on Biodiesel by nn4l · · Score: 2, Informative
    All recent Audi cars with a diesel engine can run on Biodiesel, which is a clean fuel made from rapeseed. Most other diesel car can use Biodiesel too, some require minor modifications.

    Advantages of using Biodiesel:
    • it does not contain sulphur, thus the exhaust is less aggressive to the engine and the engine last longer.
    • it is CO2 neutral because the rapeseed converts exactly as much CO2 as is released later when burning the fuel. An electric car however needs electricity, which is made burning coal or natural gas or nuclear fuel.
    • it is cheaper than the mineral oil diesel, at least in Germany. We have lots of biodiesel gas stations too.
    Some papers on advantages and technology:

    http://www.biodiesel.de/vortragen.htm

    http://www.biodiesel.de/kraften.htm

    And yes, I'm very happy using Biodiesel in my car and can recommend it to everybody else.
    1. Re:My Audi runs on Biodiesel by sgifford · · Score: 1

      Where do you get your biodiesel fuel? I've read that our New Beetle will run unmodified on BioDiesel, but I don't know where or how to get it.

      Thanks for any tips!

  172. Go figure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    where I live and work, the San Francisco Bay Area.

    Imagine that.

  173. AFV pics and EV web site... by wherley · · Score: 1

    Here are photos
    I took at an Alternative Fueled Vehicle show in Cocoa, Florida earlier this year. There are shots of a 2002 Prius, 2002 Insight, 2003 Civic Hybrid, a CNG Ford Crown Vic, GEMCar, Think!, a CNG Ford F150, Electric RAV4, and several misc vehicles.

    You might also be interested in the EVWorld web site which has plenty of news and a free EV related newsletter.

    Enjoy!

  174. Alternative biodiesel... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Save the forests and expiring natural resources. http://www.hempcar.org

  175. Foo. I just want my SEGWAY! by TerraFORM · · Score: 1

    Methinks that is the real winner here, if only for those who commute ~10miles or so one-way. And I suspect that is most.

  176. Freakin Tree Huggers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Freakin Tree Huggers, get a real car.

  177. Re:Jetta TDI has better mileage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not the MPG they are concerned about so much as the emissions. The TDI has one a 'horrible' record with emissions, just as generally most diesels do.

  178. Real Men use Nitromethane for fuel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Ethanol is for drinking!!

    1. Re:Real Men use Nitromethane for fuel by HeLLaLaMe · · Score: 1

      Yeah I think gasolone is too. Why don't you try it.

  179. The Three Big Choices by sagneta · · Score: 1

    I would suggest at this time that you have a choice of three that have reasonable price, performance, reliability and availability statistics. 1.) Prius. 2.) Insight 3.) Honda Civic Hybred I am going to give a quick overview of each vehicle. The Prius from Toyota is a more traditional hybred design which is what you would expect from Toyota. They are a bit conservative. That being said the system they devised is excellent. The Prius essentially incorporates a seperate induction engine which can power the vehicle on it own without assist for a short period at low speed. It also regenerates the batteries when braking. The advantage here is that an internal combustion piston engine cannot be efficient at all RPM's and actually only produces good torque and clean emissions during specific RPM bands. If the induction motor handles the low RPM range and can assist on the high RPM range for passing the gas engine can be tuned to the mid-range RPM band. That's what Toyota did. In fact the engine itself is one of the few examples of the Atkinson Cycle engine that actually made production. The Atkinson is very efficient but suffers from the fact that it produces dreadful low RPM torque. I think you see that its a good match with the induction motor. Thus a very light Atkinson block can power a production vehicle if an induction motor handles the low end load and assists on the high end. Nice setup. What you get is a vehicle that reliably seats 4 ( perhaps 5 if you have tiny friends ) and gets at least 50 miles to the gallon in comfort. IN addition it is very clean. NOX, HydroCarbonds, CO and CO2 are reduced greatly. The second choice is the insight which is a very different hybred vehicle actually than Toyota's. It's an integrated Motor Assist setup. The battery, unbelievably thin, is integrated with the block. That means one engine with two power systems which is a mind blower. The induction motor will assist when power is required at low end and high end but it *can't* take the entier load ever. It only assists. The the gas engine has to run for you to move. At first this doesn't sound wonderful but it actually is very clever. By assisting the engine the engine doesn't need to be as big and powerful. Thus you can get away with a small 3 cylinder engine. I mean small! In addition the induction motor will regenerate the batteries and will smooth out the vibrations with short bursts of power such that the 3 cyclinder engine wont beat itself up. They aren't balanced you know. The engine itself is a wonder. It's a super light variable valve timing lean burning engine. This is the decendant of the 92 horse power 4 cyclinder lean burner that Honda used to sell in its Honda Civic Hatchbacks some time ago. With an aluminum body and lots of batteries and a very low drag coefficient this vehicle pays every price for fuel economy which it achieves. The last vehicle is Honda's Hybred Civic. That means a production vehicle with a Hybred drive train. The first ever in automotive history and I think the most important vehicle of the three for that reason. This means these vehicles are *real* in the automotive sense. Same system as the insight only 4 cylinders and an improved induction motor and control system. This system actually idles cyclinders when you are slowing down to further conserve fuel. 51 miles per gallon and basically 20K. Beyond that same as any other Civic which is the idea. Below are much very short summarized opinions on each vehicle with an emphases on what would be best for the consumer. Insight: If you want MPG uber every other consideration then this is your vehicle. I have seen many of these vehicles driven by people with just that attitude which is fine and dandy. I think this vehicle is especially well suited to the Sunshine states. However, tho I have seen many of these vehicles in New England I can recommend this vehicle in areas where it snows. The small baby-coach wheels and low hung carrage make this a "pusher" as we call it in New England. Meaning you get out and push the vehicle through the snow banks. Serously, New England can be brutal on vehicles and frankly this car wont measure up dispite what many people may claim. But for the Sunshine states *or* a Summer vehicle this will work great. Awesome in the city in particular. Prius: I think this is the best combination of good mileage, confort and price. You don't get as good MPG as the Insight but you don't suffer the road bumps either. YOu can feel the Insight running over a termite but the Prius is civilized. My only word of caution is that this vehicle also has baby coach wheels and is a bit low hung. I expect it is better in the snow than an Insight but you may have trouble. Consider it a bigger version of a sub-compact in that sense. This is a good purchase for anybody that wants really good mileage in the City where it really shines but does not want to suffer and needs a trunk and has more than one friend. Civic Production Hybred: I actually like this vehicle the best. Ya, it doesn't have the MPG like the above two especially in the city. ( Keep in mind that the MPG on the sticker will vary much from actual driving experience with Hybreds. ) But, it does get great mileage is not as costly for its size and it is larger than the other two. The Civic will perform well in snow, sleet and ice just like past Civics. In other words, an ordinary car with an extraordinary drive train. This is the best vehicle if you just want a damn car that does damn car things but miraculously gets better mileage. If that's you then you want this car. I think that's the best reasoning I can arrive at for purchasing one over another. It really is a personal decision. You actually have a good variety of choices here. Here are some misc bits of info that I will toss in as is. o All these systems idle stop the engine. The induction motor will start them. No starter motor. The induction motor does various things on these vehicles. Move the car, regenerate power, start the engine... o The batteries are NiMetalHydride. That means a loss of power perhaps 30 percent in really cold climates. Not a *big* deal but understand this. o The batteries are 8-10 year batteries. By the time they die they should be cheaper. Assuming you don't move to Lithium Ion XXX. o The original Insight actually gets better mileage than the current ones. The lean burners were gaining MPG but emitting more NOX. They changes that to make the system SULEV rather than simply ULEV to keep up with Toyota. The price paid is less MPG and thus more CO2. In Europe with Diesels they will tolerate more NOX, HydroCarb and Particulate matter to get less CO2. In the US its no NOX, Particulate Matter and HydroCarbon but CO2 is ok. o You engine cycles that you will be seeing in the future are: Atkinson (Toyota) Miller (Mazda) and advances on the Otto (everybody else in the world). You also will see a return of the Wankel Rotary engine apparently. o 42 Volt systems are in vogue in Detroit since they are cheaper, get you 25 percent better mileage and allow them to provide more power for appliances. The system has super lead acid batteries and an induction motor that will start the engine from idle stop and regenerate. It will not propel the vehicle. Contractor special pickups will arrive that can use the engine as a generator which is actually more efficient and cleaner than the ones at Home Depot.

  180. Not only that: by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 2

    The price was also $35-45k, depending on model year and features.

    $35-45k will buy you a nice luxury car with dead-cow seats and all the features you could ever want... or, it'll buy you the peace of mind that you're not harming the rainforest (a forest which, incidentally, couldn't give a rat's ass about your EV-1.)

    Obviously, most people saw the price tag, had a seizure, and bought an Accord instead.

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  181. lets not forget the civic hybrid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    people only seem to be mentioning the honda insight but honda has released a civic hybrid this year. it eliminates the seating issue and looks more like a plain family car. warning, crappy flash site. http://civichybrid.honda.com/

  182. Hell with the Earth! Get a Canyonaro! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tried to go electric but got so fed up with the offerings that I ended up buying a Trail Blazer! Not quite sure how that happened!

    Funny thing is, now we are looking at a full size Expedition!

    Something has killed the Environmentalist in me!

    When I was in university (poor) I was a staunch environmentalist. Now that I am employed and have a good income, I find myself destroying the earth in ways not though possible :)

    Oh Well.

    If you can't beat em! etc....

  183. Hm by zapfie · · Score: 2

    I realize this might sound silly, but what's the point of an electric car? While the car itself doesn't produce pollution, it has to get its electricity from somewhere, and in the vast majority of cases it will be from a power source that pollutes anyway. Could someone explain this to me?

    --
    slashdot!=valid HTML
    1. Re:Hm by happyclam · · Score: 2
      While the car itself doesn't produce pollution, it has to get its electricity from somewhere, and in the vast majority of cases it will be from a power source that pollutes anyway.

      The REAL irony is that the electricity probably comes from deisel trains. Sort of a perverse circuit when fuel powers a vehicle that makes electricity to power a vehicle specifically for the purpose of not burning fuel.

      Now my brain hurts. I'm going to go lie down now...

      --
      He looked at me and said, "Kid, we don't like your kind, and we're gonna send your fingerprints off to Washington."
    2. Re:Hm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The way I understand it, it is a scaling issue. Just as one large factory can turn out a certain number of items more efficiently than a number of smaller factories can turn out that same number of items, so too can a power plant's engine provide motive force for travel more efficiently than a number of smaller engines.

      Now, in the case of electric cars there will be some energy loss due to the batteries being a bit lossy, but a quick search gave me figures like 25% to 30% efficiency for internal combustion engines vs. 70% to 80% for power plants, lets say 70% for the battery (figures vary pretty wildly for various types and states or charge), and 85% for the electric motor in the car giving an over all rating of about 45% (sorry I couldn't find any quick numbers for power line efficiency).

      Also, power plant engines are usually watched by professionals and tweaked for efficiency while car engine efficiency is subject to the highly variable amount of mantinance given by car owners. So the average running efficiency for power plants is probably closer to peak values than the efficieny of the average car engine.

  184. http://www.get113to138mpg.com/ by taswitzer · · Score: 1

    i have been thinking trying this technology out with my bus. now quite sure if it's on the level, anyone got any info?

  185. What the hell happened to gas mileage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Back in the 80's, car companies were advertising cars that got 60 mpg (toyota?). Now here we are in 2002 and we need weirdo electric-gas hybrids just to get 45 mpg? Who's paying off who here?

  186. HELLO! AC PROPUSION T-ZERO!!! by g00bd0g · · Score: 1

    This is THE electric car to get. Maybe expensive, but you can smoke just about any production gas vehicle on the market. Vette's, Porche's and Ferrari's included. Get's well over 50 miles range and top speed is only limited by the speed controller. If I had the cash I would own one of these. I have seen 2 of these driving around my area so I know you can actually get one.

    0 to 60 mph 4.07 sec
    1/4 mile 13.24 sec at 90 mph

    Check out the website for the mind-boggling drag race videos!

    http://www.acpropulsion.com/tzero_pages/tzero_ho me .htm

  187. How about the Twike? by naasking · · Score: 1
    http://twike.com

    Small, all-electric vehicle. Two seater plus room for luggage, but definitely not a full-sized car.

    From their page:
    PERFORMANCE
    Max. speed: 85 km/h / Range: 40-90 km, depending on driving style, topography and quantity of energy packs / Hill-start capability: 22% / Useful load: 2 persons plus luggage.
    DRIVE
    Electric: digital performance electronics with asynchronous motor / 3 kW continuous power, 5 kW peak power, regenerative braking and Tempomat cruise control / Muscle power: 2 mechanical pedals linked to a 5-speed hub gears, automatic pedal clutch / Energy Pack: NiCd 360 V, 2.0 to 3.3 KWh (2-3 modules each rated at 3.0 Ah, with individual electronic monitoring) / Energy consumption: 4-8 kWh/100 km from the mains, i.e. 10 times more economical than a small car / Energy costs: approx. one Swiss cent per kilometre, equivalent to 100 Fr. per year (10,000 km) / Rapid charge: 10-90 minutes (1 kilometre per minute) / Full charge: from 2 hours at 230 Volts / 10-Amp wall socket.

    You can even pedal if you're up to it. :-)
  188. I would buy one of those ... but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    They all look LIKE ASS. I mean really. These are the most BUTT-UGLY cars on the road today. If they made an electric car look like a Mazda RX-7, or a Ford Mustang, I might actually consider dropping down the money and doing the environmentally correct thing.

    I'm sorry, but until the looks and style of these cars change into something that doesn't INSULT MY MANHOOD, I'll drive my gas guzzling car (Hey, 25mpg ain't bad).

  189. Some Quick Math by sterno · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just for the record, I did a little quick research to find out how much farm use this would require. I found an estimate suggesting that 1 acre of rapeseed was sufficient to yield 100 gallons of biodiesel. So...

    Total arable land in the US: 464 million acres
    Max theoretical fuel output: 46.4 billion gallons
    Annual gas usage in the US: 400 million gallons

    Now, depending on the fuel economy inherent to bio-diesel as opposed to unleaded, this would imply that with less than 1% of the arable land in the US dedicated to making bio-diesel, there would be a surplus of fuel available.

    So, I don't think this is a problem unless my numbers about rapeseed to biodiesel conversion are incorrect.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
    1. Re:Some Quick Math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Where do you get your data?

      Annual US fuel usage of 400 million gallons, with a US population of about 290 million, implies each citizen uses less than 1.4 gallons of fuel each year. Sounds like your numbers are way off, sir!

    2. Re:Some Quick Math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Aye. That sounds more like daily consumption.

      http://www.eia.doe.gov/oil_gas/petroleum/info_gl an ce/consumption.html
      Quickie google search.
      Note they are measuring in thousands of gallons.
      Perhaps he used a resource like this, and didn't notice that fact.

    3. Re:Some Quick Math by fmackay · · Score: 1

      Annual gas usage in the US: 400 million gallons
      I think you'll find that number is the daily gasoline consumption of the US, and that total petroleum usage is more than double that.
    4. Re:Some Quick Math by sterno · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Alright, now that I sit and think about the numbers some more, it doesn't make a lot of sense. Got it from the government. Which may not speak highly to it's accuracy but anyhow:

      http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/hsfaq.htm

      Specifically they show motor fuel usage about halfway down the page:

      In 2000, gallons of fuel consumed were:

      128,883,609 (Gasoline - highway use)
      33,376,587 (Special fuel - highway use)
      162,260,196 (Total fuel - highway use)
      2,971,636 (Non-highway use)


      Actually I just realized I added those up incorrectly and total use (according to them) is actually lower by these numbers. It should be Total fuel plus non-highway use. But I agree with you that this number doesn't make sense, so I'm guessing there's an order of magnitude that they aren't making clear. So hunting elsewhere:

      http://www.howstuffworks.com/question417.htm

      Okay, so from there we get 360 million gallons of gas every day. Sounds like a more realistic number. So multiply that and we get roughly 130 billion gallons of gas every day....

      So, nevermind then, if we took every single piece of arable land we wouldn't come close to the amount needed. So go with hydrogen, there's plenty of that around :).

      --
      This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
    5. Re:Some Quick Math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to what I found on the web, Minnesota alone has 2.5 billion gallons of annual gasoline usage.

    6. Re:Some Quick Math by jaoswald · · Score: 2

      The replies below accurately represent the errors in what you state for gasoline consumption. (I sympathize entirely--data from the web is always in different, incomparable units, and you can easily miss the necessary factors. I've actually made the same mistake in a Slashdot discussion on solar energy)

      One (relatively weak) point is that the total "arable" land is somewhat larger than you state; however, the actual amount of land being used for cropland is something less than 400 million acres.

      Presumably, we could convert forest and pasture land to rapeseed cultivation, but it is unlikely to improve the situation much, as those are about the same amount as the total cropland, so you could only get a potential doubling of the resource, at the price of a huge change in land use patterns.

    7. Re:Some Quick Math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much of the fuel is consumed in the farming? That is the problem with ethanol, more than one gallon of ethanol is need to produce one gallon of ethanol. It is a loosing proposition before it leaves the farm.

    8. Re:Some Quick Math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although, when you think that the government subsidizes farmers to keep crop prices up, using biodiesel would increase the demand for farm produce and free up some government funding for other things.

    9. Re:Some Quick Math by scaryman · · Score: 0

      something that has to be taken into account is that the vegetable oil is converted into diesel not petrol, and diesel engines are usually more efficent than petrol engines.Allthough it would still be difficult to produce enough fuel purely from vegatable oil, if this is combined with more efficent engines, other biomass fuels (including hemp, bio-waste( methane from sewage works and landfill sites), hydrogen, and renewable sources of electricity, it would free up petroleum resources for the petrol-chemical uses rather than wasteing it in cars.

  190. Th!nk Mobility by xaeridus · · Score: 1

    If your looking for an electric Vehicle, maybe you should consider the Th!nk City. It doesn't quite reach 65 MPH, but it does qualify for HOV lane stickers and you can help bring the car to market by participating in their special testing lease.

    1. Re:Th!nk Mobility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Of course, there is the little "Ford Motor Company" logo on their web pages. Ford doesn't exactly need my help. They haven't even demonstrated the ability to build a gasoline-engine car that's reliable, I have zero faith in their electric.

      I hate phoney "new different super cool keen" car companies that are just shill fronts for the main company (ie - SATURN). I'm not fooled.

  191. Honda has another hybrid coming... by barzok · · Score: 2

    For 2003 there will be a Civic 4-door hybrid, with basically the next iteration of the Insight's technology. From the one report I saw about it, it's almost impossible to tell the difference between it and "conventional" Civic.

  192. Not hemp... by Kafir · · Score: 1

    1) [Ethanol is] a false economy.

    Very true. Here in Ohio our gasoline is all part ethanol, because it's hard for lawmakers to resist the pressure for farm subsidies.

    2) [Ethanol] mostly uses corn as its source... What about hemp or some other crop that might require less insecticide, fertilizer, etc.

    Producing ethanol requires sugars to ferment; corn is a very good cheap source of sugar. That's why so many foods are sweetened with corn syrup (that, and U.S. trade protectionism keeps cane sugar prices jacked up, again because of the power of agricultural lobbies).
    Hemp, despite its several uses, is useless as a sugar source. I can't think of any U.S. crop that would serve as well as corn. Sorghum, maybe.

    Anyhow, ethanol doesn't make sense as a fuel source right now, but as easily retrieved petroleum becomes scarcer and oil prices go up I do expect ethanol to become important in the U.S., because we have no shortage of cropland and because it requires minimal changes to current internal combustion technology.

  193. Tyler Durden's fuel of choice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The maufacturing process is very similar to the soap-making process; if you've ever made soap in your kitchen, you can make biodiesel in your kitchen.

    I am Jack's eco-friendly fuel.

  194. Just get a VW TDI (Golf, Jetta or Beetle) by ProfBooty · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Get a Volkswagen TDI model (http://www.tdiclub.com/). In the US they have TDI jetta's, beetles and golfs (nearly every model in europe has a TDI, passat, lupo etc). In the US they are only rated for about 90hp(and 155hp of torque stock, they can get up to 115hp fairly easily), but get 49MPG (over 700miles a tank) for highway mileage. The TDI lupo (only in europe) is rated for 90MPG and costs far less than a honda!

    They do offer a 150hp TDI engine in europe which still gets really good gas mileage, but won't run on current US grade diesel (which is real poor). There is even a TDI GTI! VW/Audi sells six different diesels in Europe (1.2l, 1.9l - 90hp, 1.9l - 110hp, 1.9l -115hp, 2.5l - 150hp, V8 3.3l - 225hp[available soon]) compared to only the 1.9l - 90hp available in North America. When mentioning these horse power figures though, we must also think where this power is available. On the 1.9l 90hp it peak torque is available at just 1900RPMs with 155 ft/lbs torque up to the V8 3.3l which generates 355 ft/lbs torque between 1800 and 3000RPMs. I guess we can only dream of these really high output models.

    Diesel is good, unfortuneatly it got a bad name in the US due to the amount of black smoke earlier cars and big trucks would put out (about 2% of US cars are diesel compared to over 25% in Europe. A properly tuned diesel shouldnt spew black smole and has gobs of torque which is great for driving around town(you won't win a drag race).

    VW is really the only auto manufacturer who still offers diesel cars, and their prices start around 15k. Plus you get a car which is much nicer than a civic both on the in and outside.

    I expect more manufacturer's to bring diesels over to the US once the fuel standards increase.

    On a side note, is there any technical problem which has stop diesel electric hybrids in cars (they have diesel electric trains). Seems to me you would get a more fuel efficent car than a gas electric.

    --
    Bring back the old version of slashdot.
    1. Re:Just get a VW TDI (Golf, Jetta or Beetle) by RevDobbs · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hear hear. With in the last couple of issues of Car & Driver, the TDI VW's were found to be much more efficient, and fun to drive, than the Honda Insight. Also, you can by a VW, where as the hybrid vehicles usually come with a fairly restrictive lease (or so I've been told).

      I got stuck driving a Toyota Prius for a couple of days while my car was in the shop. No acceleration, almost dangerously top-heavy with a short & narrow wheelbase & width, the car was absolutely no fun to drive. The high-efficiency diesels are the most practical way to go.

      YMMV.

    2. Re:Just get a VW TDI (Golf, Jetta or Beetle) by Master+Bait · · Score: 2, Informative
      I'm driving a 1982 VWJetta diesel with close to 350,000 miles on it. It has the older non-turbo 1600cc engine and gets 52mpg on my local two-lane roads. Diesels last far longer than gasoline engines because the fuel lubricates the valve train, while gasoline is a solvent to lubricants.

      I'm not all that excited about biodiesel because of the methanol needed to produce it. But I'm interested in a system that burns straight vegetable oil.

      --
      "Only in their dreams can men truly be free 'twas always thus, and always thus will be."
      --Tom Schulman
    3. Re:Just get a VW TDI (Golf, Jetta or Beetle) by bgarcia · · Score: 3, Informative
      On a side note, is there any technical problem which has stop diesel electric hybrids in cars (they have diesel electric trains). Seems to me you would get a more fuel efficent car than a gas electric.
      I guess the quick answer is "no". But just FYI, a diesel-electric train works differently than a gas-electric hybrid car.

      The diesel engine in a train does one thing: it turns an alternator to produce electricity. This electricity is then used to run the electric motors to turn the wheels.

      The hybrid cars usually still have the engine hooked up to the wheels using a driveshaft, and the electric motor just supplements the engine (or vise-versa).

      --
      I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
    4. Re:Just get a VW TDI (Golf, Jetta or Beetle) by carlhirsch · · Score: 2

      I'm not all that excited about biodiesel because of the methanol needed to produce it. But I'm interested in a system that burns straight vegetable oil [greasel.com].

      Thanks MB, I actually wasn't aware of the distinction between Biodiesel (mixed or 100% vegetable oil) and vehicles running off of waste grease. The actual implementations I've seen have run waste oil but the owners called them biodiesel.

      --
      . We've got computers, we're tapping phone lines, you know that ain't allowed - Talking Heads, "Life During Wartime"
    5. Re:Just get a VW TDI (Golf, Jetta or Beetle) by DutchSter · · Score: 3, Interesting
      On a side note, is there any technical problem which has stop diesel electric hybrids in cars (they have diesel electric trains). Seems to me you would get a more fuel efficent car than a gas electric.
      Perhaps it has to do with the way the gas/electric hybrids operate. The hybrids frequently kill the engine when it isn't needed. This is fine if you have a big enough electrical system to accomidate it. In fact these hybrids are super efficient in that area.

      Diesels on the other hand take a bit more juice to get going, even with the new TDI technology. Perhaps this shifts the balance away in favor of having to run the engine more often, ofsetting the potential gains. From a technical standpoint, diesels are much more suited to continuous operation. One big reason emergency vehicles where persuit speed isn't critical (ambulance, fire truck etc) use diesel is that they are content to be idling at the scene for hours at a time. (This is in addition to the availability of low RPM high torque). Gas engines on the other hand, build up carbon and the plugs can get fouled up if they idle for too long. Most police departments get rid of their vehicles well before 100k miles, in part because of the loss of performance due to excessive idling. Yet, my town will keep firetrucks until the bottom rusts out 20, sometimes 30 years - then they sell the engine to the public/another department and convert the leftover body to scrap metal.

      That is also your tradeoff; while diesels are well suited for extended idle situations, they aren't as well suited for frequent on/off use. Instead, this is where they get their buildup, constant temperature fluxuations in the engine block and short runtime. Think about the train (as someone else did) - they fire that sucker up in the morning and don't shut it down until they get wherever, even if they are stopped for an hour. On/off every other block is quite a different usage :) And this is the big advantage of hybrids - they start and stop the engine frequently in the course of normal operation.
    6. Re:Just get a VW TDI (Golf, Jetta or Beetle) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a problem with that logic. Diesel in the states have terrible emissions, and its not just "black smoke". I dont have the figures in front of me but I recall reading sometime back about the emissions of diesel in Europe vs. the states. Its the fuel quality and makup that is the issue though, not the car.

      Kudos to VW for making these cars. The states just needs to get their shit together and regulate diesel better and require low emissions levels even for diesels (including commercial vehicles).

      Biodiesel is used not simply for better mileage but precisely because of this issue (albeit it is more expensive).

      Getting a Diesel in the states only solves half of the problem. Of course thats 50% better than gasoline vehicles, but its still not anywhere near where we should be in 2002.

    7. Re:Just get a VW TDI (Golf, Jetta or Beetle) by j-beda · · Score: 2
      I seem to recall a few years back reading about a diesel engine (maybe from VW?) that was designed for super fuel efficiency, combined with a contineously variable transmission. The engine would shut down when stopped or coasting or decellerating and would startup again as the accelerator was pressed, presumably with minimal delay.

      It seems as though the on/off problem was solved in at least this one design.

    8. Re:Just get a VW TDI (Golf, Jetta or Beetle) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was going to get a vw tdi until i found out that it runs on diesel. diesels have gotten better, but its still diesel and still pollutes alot of toxic chemicals. It doesn't even qualify as a low emission veh. In fact, its one of the dirtiest cars on the road. It terms of mpg, its up there with the other hybrids. But remember, one of the major reasons people get hybrid cars is decrease air pollution.

    9. Re:Just get a VW TDI (Golf, Jetta or Beetle) by DutchSter · · Score: 2
      I seem to recall a few years back reading about a diesel engine (maybe from VW?) that was designed for super fuel efficiency, combined with a contineously variable transmission. The engine would shut down when stopped or coasting or decellerating and would startup again as the accelerator was pressed, presumably with minimal delay.

      It seems as though the on/off problem was solved in at least this one design.
      Anyone? I do distinctly remember reading this somewhere, but I can't remember who it was or whether it was actually a technology that worked. I think it was Motor Trend, perhaps two years ago. That's all I can remember. Who knows, they may have discovered that they were doing too much warranty work on the engine or something :)

      If it's an efficient success, I sure hope they figure out how to build a hybrid out of it!
    10. Re:Just get a VW TDI (Golf, Jetta or Beetle) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or get a regular Audi A4 1.8T. Sure, it's not alternative fuel, but the feeling you get from driving such a magnificent vehicle will overcome that shortly. (Replacement ECU brings it to 200HP and 250ft/lb of torque! :) And really high mileage out of the 1.8L... I get about 400/tank highway.

      (hehe, sorry, just bought one, had to harp on it for a bit - I'm betting this gets modded way down ;p )

      AND NO, IT DOES NOT RUN LINUX.

    11. Re:Just get a VW TDI (Golf, Jetta or Beetle) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (fuck, there goes my karma)

      I know that Herbert K. on the Onion says "word is bond", but for all the times that I've heard the phrase in an actual song, it sounds a lot more like "word is born" than "word is bond"

    12. Re:Just get a VW TDI (Golf, Jetta or Beetle) by ksheff · · Score: 1

      It's the European TDI that another poster referred to that gets 90mpg. I think it used a much bigger than normal flywheel to help restart the engine when it temporarily turns off.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    13. Re:Just get a VW TDI (Golf, Jetta or Beetle) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Emission from diesel powered cars is nearly as bad as their gasoline counterparts. Though you can go farther on a tank of gas, it's not as powerful as gas, and not nearly as clean as other alternatives.

      Ever been stuck behind an old diesel mercedes on the freeway?

    14. Re:Just get a VW TDI (Golf, Jetta or Beetle) by haahr · · Score: 1

      There are no restrictive leases on the Prius, Insight, or Hybrid Civic. (I think you're thinking of the pure electric vehicles, which have been lease only, though the Ford/Think Mobility will be available for purchase this fall.)

      I own a Prius. It's a perfectly pleasant car, but it's not a performance car. If you covet a BMW, this is not the car for you. If, like me, you want something small, efficient, convenient to drive, it's perfect. (However, the UI to the audio system is truly awful.)

      Alas, since it's not a ZEV (zero emissions vehicle), you can't drive solo in it in carpool lanes in California.

    15. Re:Just get a VW TDI (Golf, Jetta or Beetle) by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 2

      This still doesn't prevent a hybrid-electric diesel (HETDI?) design.

      Keep the diesel engine running at a low rpm continuously (useful for highway runs), and even in the city, where it might have a lower rpm mode, to recharge the batteries.

      But rely on the electric motors and regenerative braking for the stop and go, only shutting off the engine after a good amount of time. Instead of starting and stopping at every light, keep it running for a while (say 15 minutes), and if it doesn't get goosed, then shut down until the car enters a freeway situation.

      Or better yet, have a switch/toggle between city and highway mode, and let the driver decide.

    16. Re:Just get a VW TDI (Golf, Jetta or Beetle) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I owned a TDI in Europe for many years, and got 50-60 mpg. This included daily Autobahn trips to work and back home at 110-120 mph (=top speed). Because of the incredible mileage per tank filling, I frequently forgot which side of the car the tank nozzle was at. Audi actually made a TV spot about this 'phenomenon'.
      My TDI (in '92) was the first diesel model with catalytic converter, and rubber mounted engine to reduce noise and vibration.
      The standard 4 cylinder TDI has 90 hp (66 kW), and can be chip-tuned to 115 hp, and higher.
      The low-rpm torque is unbelievable, It was possible to shift the car from 1st through 4th gear on an even pavement without touching the throttle, or sliding the clutch over two seconds.
      I consider the TDI engine (engineered by Audi, later adapted by parent VW, and sister Skoda) one of the best low-emission engines ever designed.

    17. Re:Just get a VW TDI (Golf, Jetta or Beetle) by iggie · · Score: 1

      There is one and only one reason that the hybrids are gas-electric instead of diesel-electric. Go and ask any 'environmentalist' you know what they think about diesel. Likelier than not, they will tell you diesels are 'dirty' 'sooty', 'stinky', produce acid rain, etc. All true of a 20 year old diesel, all false for a modern one. Perceptions are hard to change, and Honda and Toyota knew well enough they would have no chance with a diesel electric because of these perceptions in the very same niche market they are trying to sell into. Of course if we didn't have all of this ignorance, we would have 100 MPG diesel-electrics by now. Gas-electric is about the stupidest thing you can do from a technology and efficiency standpoint, but the only thing that could have a market in this country. Pretty sad really.

    18. Re:Just get a VW TDI (Golf, Jetta or Beetle) by SectoidRandom · · Score: 2

      When i was in Germany in September 2000, i had a ride in one of those VW Polo's (the baby two door), yes the engine did shut off at lights, and as soon as you let go of the break it would start again.. The delay was unnoticable in city driving, but i must say it freaked me out every time i pulled up at a set of lights! :)

    19. Re:Just get a VW TDI (Golf, Jetta or Beetle) by iggie · · Score: 1

      Diesels on the other hand take a bit more juice to get going

      The amount of 'juice' (lets just call it energy, say), that it takes to start an engine - diesel or gas is totally negligible. Lets say you run a starter at 250 amps at 12 V for 2 seconds. Thats 3 kW, but only for two seconds. Say you have a little 50 hp diesel - that's 37 kW, so the energy used to start the diesel will be restored in less than 0.2 seconds.

      Think about the train (as someone else did) - they fire that sucker up in the morning and don't shut it down until they get wherever

      The reason for that is trains use diesel in a turbine engine - essentially a jet engine, not the internal combustion engine we're talking about here. Turbines are much more difficult to start (and shut down) compared to internal combustion, that's why they don't shut them down on a train, and why they don't shut them down on a plane either.
      The cycling frequency of a diesel-electric hybrid can be altered by altering the size of the battery bank. Basically, you want to run the diesel at constant load and keep it warm between starts. Diesels like to work. They don't like to idle, and they don't like varying loads. Other than that they could care less how often you start them.

      Also, I agree with the parent about the TDIs which are great, but don't forget the venerable Mercedez 300 D series. They have good performance, and are built like tanks. Of course the mileage is slightly more than half of the TDIs, but hey, we're running these on BioDiesel made from used vegetable oil, right?

    20. Re:Just get a VW TDI (Golf, Jetta or Beetle) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There really is no technical reason why diesel could not be used. This past Spring, I was involved in the FutureTruck 2002 project (http://www.futuretruck.org/) and most of the teams used diesel for their combustion engines. Some of them (2) actually went entirely without a combustion engine and implemented PEM fuel cells in order to charge their batteries. Although the power output was not as high as expected, the future is there for fuel cells (one of the two teams was able to get 2kW out of their fuel cell).

      Michael

    21. Re:Just get a VW TDI (Golf, Jetta or Beetle) by TicTacTux · · Score: 1
      Basically the best bet for a hybrid car would be a diesel engine operating at best efficiency (power/consumption ratio, fixed at xxxx rpm) which drives a generator which loads the batteries and feeds the motor. Once the batteries are fully loaded, the diesel stops until they need recharging again.

      Submarine technology, some 60 years old...

      --
      Use The Source, Luke!
    22. Re:Just get a VW TDI (Golf, Jetta or Beetle) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually trains do use diesel engines and not turbines. As far as I know the only turbine powered trains in the us have been retired for a while. They where too noisy. And yes I know that can be fixed today. Of course a tubo diesel or any turbo charged engine can be considered a primitive gas turbine. Look at some of the F1 racing motors from the 80s the turbos where bigger then the engine.

    23. Re:Just get a VW TDI (Golf, Jetta or Beetle) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My VW TDI Jetta runs on used cooking oil. I get 45 mpg doing 65 mph!! I used http://www.greasel.com to convert my car. He took about 75 pictures of the installation, so maybe they will soon show on his web site!!

      Greg

    24. Re:Just get a VW TDI (Golf, Jetta or Beetle) by mrv · · Score: 1

      If you claim that a Prius has no acceleration, that's just because you never pressed the accelerator pedal down. Between the torque and acceleration from a stop with the electric motors, I never get passed from a stop light (first off the line), even when against jumpy VW drivers.

      You are probably just too used to driving by ear. The Prius has a CVT (Continuously Variable Transmission), like is also available on the Honda Civic hybrid and Insight, and several luxury cars. The CVT keeps the RPM levels of the gas engine at the peak efficiency for the desired power requested by the pedal. So, when you went to accelerate, you probably heard the Prius engine rev up high, which sounds scary if you're not used to a CVT, so you instintively let off the accellerator pedal, which means that you just requested less power than you really want to get you going. Ignore the engine sounds - watch the spedometer, and you'll be accellerating without any problems or "sluggishness."

      The lease on a Prius (from what I hear) is no more restrictive than any other lease available from Toyota.

      The only Prius owners (and I've met a LOT) that have mentioned a top-heavy feeling for the Prius had their tire pressures dangerously low. If the tires are properly inflated, there is no issue.

      The Prius is way too fun to drive. It's so much fun to "stealth" around in all-electric, have your engine shut off at stoplights, etc. The turning radius is not to be missed. (I've been able to pull out of a parking space, do a 180 without hitting any other cars, and park back in the space I just came out of!)

      If you want a high-mileage car only, then I have no problems recommending a VW TDI. If you are concerned about emissions, I'd never think of a diesel in the US. (The EPA even regulates how long a diesel bus/truck can idle for air quality/health reasons! They just fined the MBTA in Boston for idling their busses too long...)
      Please see http://www.insightcentral.net/compare-honda-insigh t.html for a comparison of the Honda Insight, Honda Civic Hybrid, Toyota Prius, Toyota Rav4EV, VW TDI Beetle, GM EV-1, and the Ford Explorer... Compared to the 3 hybrids, the VW TDI Beetle is a very dirty creature! Also the acceleration on the automatic VW TDI Beetle is slower than that of the Prius in the 0-60mph test. (VW=14.1sec, Prius=13.0sec)

      --
      -mrv
    25. Re:Just get a VW TDI (Golf, Jetta or Beetle) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We purchased a TDI Jetta last summer. Drove it until Volkswagon bought it back in November. It ran fine for the first couple of months but after that it started having electrical problems.

      All of the warning lights came on, the Tach would drop to zero and occassionally the Odometer would show 00000000 (would have been nice if it stayed there...). The biggest problem was that sometimes the automatic transmission would go into 'Safemode' (Is VW using embedded XP for its vehicles? ;>) and stay in second gear. It wouldn't go down to first and would not shift up from second. It could get you to the dealership but was a PITA otherwise. We took it back 5 times before we finally demanded they take it back. They tried everything including having VW engineering on the phone. They replaced the instrument cluster a couple of times, they installed some wires that previously did not exist and so forth.

      While I was looking around for what to replace the jetta with I talked with a salesman at the Acura dealership. He had another customer who had a jetta being bought back because they brake pads had worn out 4 times in 6 months.

      A friend was recently considering a Jetta TDI wagon but after researching on the internet he found that my experience with the Jetta was not unique so he ended up going with a Toyota Matrix.

      We got a Toyota Celica ;)

    26. Re:Just get a VW TDI (Golf, Jetta or Beetle) by maddskillz · · Score: 1

      That's the point of the TDI...to run on diesel! Otherwise, get the 2.slow, it's the same car with a different engine

  195. Parade by SubtleNuance · · Score: 3, Informative

    You might like to have a look at this Parade here

    Specs include:
    Range : 60miles(EV60)/150miles(EV150)
    Acceleration : 8 seconds for 0-60 km/h
    Top Speed : 110km/h


    Made in Korea.

  196. Alternative Vehicles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me first start by suggesting that you look at either the Toyota Prius or Honda Civic Hybrid. As one who happens to have a Honda Insight in the driveway I can say that it is quite useful as a commuter vehicle.
    Many people are judging the alternative fuel vehicles by their MPG - and in that light they are go "why not get a Jetta TDI" - well the point in looking at the hybrids or natural gas vehicles is to avoid the issue of emissions which diesels are are not. That is a major tradeoff between the TDI and say Insight.
    On the same note; I very much put the "environmentalism" of the hybrid cars in doubt considering the additional uses of plastics, and batteries. I would say this might even be a near zero-sum situation.
    I put the question of total environmental costs to many students often asking them to question the costs in making those energy-effecient lights instead of your standard bulbs. And while I may not have an answer to my own question it atleast opens their minds to a greater holistic realm of thought.

  197. get gas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck hydrid cars.

  198. Biodiesel by nothing_23 · · Score: 2, Informative
    One major alternative fuel that appears to have been missed by others is Biodiesel. Biodiesel can easily be made with used fryer grease , and has none of the SOx or particulate matter emissions that normal diesel, or gasoline have.

    The major benefit of biodiesel is that you don't need any major change in hardware. All diesel powered vehicles can use Biodiesel with no modifications.

    I am a student at the University of Washington, and we recycle the used grease from restaurants by the university to fuel many of the campus vehicles.

  199. VW Lupo gets 90mpg and is a TDI by ProfBooty · · Score: 2

    um the VW lupo gets 90MPG, and is in production NOW. Most of the really nice diesels are in europe :(

    There is a vw diesel concept which got 240mpg.

    goto www.vwvortex.com for info

    --
    Bring back the old version of slashdot.
    1. Re:VW Lupo gets 90mpg and is a TDI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Lupo is just one of many cars that we don't get to enjoy in the States because of dumbasses driving pickups and 4x4 wagons (I refuse to use the 'SUV' moniker....how is a 5000lb vehicle sporty?!?!). I'm still waiting patiently for an Audi S3 to sneak it's way over here.

    2. Re:VW Lupo gets 90mpg and is a TDI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      supposedly the next gen s3 is coming to the us in 2004

      check www.audiworld.com for details

    3. Re:VW Lupo gets 90mpg and is a TDI by ReidMaynard · · Score: 1

      gosh are "dumbasses driving pickups" holding a gun to VW's head ?

      These companies *choose* which models to sell in which markets (omiting safety, emitions regs)

      There is no *to small* USA regulation.

      -Reid

      --
      -- www.globaltics.net

      Political discussion for a new world

  200. Get the EV Rav4 by Thagg · · Score: 2

    One of my partners at work has an electic RAV4. It's totally electric, and has a range of about 100 miles, and a top speed of 80 MPH. It's every bit a 'real car', it's exactly a RAV4 with the engine ripped out and an electric motor squeezed in, and with somewhat lower rolling-resistance (but still full sized) tires.

    I love this car. It's big enough for four full-sized people, it's peppy, and it's wonderfully silent.

    Of course it's only available in California; I didn't know if that's where you were from (GM's EVs were mostly in CA.) California also lets you drive this car in carpool lanes with one person, and lets you park at any parking meter for free, as incentives.

    You can rent these at some Thrifty locations, if you want to try before you buy.

    I can't say enough good things about this car. It's just wonderful. The only downside is the cost, which is an eye-watering $41,000. What makes that somewhat more tolerable is that you get a whopping $9,000 rebate back from the IRS, and something like $3,000 back from the state Franchise Tax Board. The cost of electricity ends up being about 1 cent per mile, far less than gasoline would be.

    And, since there is no gas tank under the back seats, they put the spare tire there, instead of hanging it off the back.

    thad

    --
    I love Mondays. On a Monday, anything is possible.
  201. As opposed to gasoline? by g8oz · · Score: 1
    Subsidized by lots of taxpayer dollars

    Well so is the oil industry if you look at the overall picture. How many billions have gone into supporting a foreign policy predicated on protecting oil supplies?


    I'm not convinced that corn is the best crop

    But you don't really know one way or the other now do you?

    It's kind of fuel-intensive to make

    But again, you don't really know.

    1. Re:As opposed to gasoline? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cost is not important as the net energy generated which is what counts.

      For example if a factory "makes" gasoline and I put in 100 gals and I get back 90 gals of gas. what good does that do us? You wasted 10 gals "making" the same 100 gals I started with?

      Why dont the ethanol plants run on ethanol instead of fossil fuels? If they were net energy positive they could burn their own ethanol.

      Ethanol is hugely dependent on non-renewable fossil fuels and therefore the oil prices also. When energy increases ethanol will cost more becuase it takes 1.2 BTUS of fossil fuel to make 1 BTU of ethanol.

      We need to either improve ethanol or kill it.

  202. get a diesel or hybrid by drbart · · Score: 1

    all-electric cars are a net lose in terms of energy and environment.

    the hybrid 4-door cars are good for 45-50 mpg.

    a diesel jetta is rated at 41 mpg, *but* diesel fuel , being roughly kerosene, requires much less effort and energy to refine than gasoline.

  203. try one of the following by josepha48 · · Score: 2
    This is the toyota rav4 made into an EV (not a hybrid). http://rav4ev.toyota.com/consumer/rav4ev_0_home/ra v_home.htm

    got to ford as they have a ranger (if you really want a ford .. yuck) as they have an electric ranger..

    And then go to evworld.com and read about what else is available and coming.. there are several companies that seem to be moving electic and hybrid vehicles into their lines ...

    --

    Only 'flamers' flame!

  204. Alternative Fuel by toaztke · · Score: 1

    Alternative fuel = Rocket fuel

    --
    This is a backwards place but I don't feel like driving in reverse.
  205. Site your sources by DaveWood · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is really important stuff. You may very well be right, and I'm extremely interested in what you're saying, but with specific information like this (where everyone's memories are contradicting each other) it's all meaningless unless you site your sources!

    -Dave

    1. Re:Site your sources by uhoreg · · Score: 1

      ("cite", not "site") It's also meaningless unless we have the numbers for gasoline as well to compare against.

      --

      To get something done, a committee should consist of no more than three persons, two of them absent.

  206. How about a Twike by windy2319 · · Score: 1

    It's sort of a cross between a bicycle and an electric car. Here's an article on someone in Vermont who bought one in Seattle: http://www.evworld.com/databases/storybuilder.cfm? storyid=104

  207. Corbin Motors by squarefish · · Score: 1

    Corbin Motors offers several alternatives to the standard vehicle. There aim is single occupancy, for people that primarily travel alone on their commute (most people do), very efficient and cool looking- and you can get them now!
    cool furniture too!

    --
    Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.
  208. Other Alternatives, way beyond glitzy electric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Voltswagon diesel beetle, 70miles per gallon, plus see the following link.
    http://www.maricopa.gov/sbeap/biofuel2-001. htm
    for a way to go really alternative.

    No html for me i'm saving bits, go ahead overlook this, just another anonymous poster.

  209. Why are these MPG so low? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In 1989 I had a '79 Subaru FE that got 48 mpg on the highway at 70 MPH. At 45 MPH it got 62 mpg. This was out of a 1500 pound car made in 1979 with 125,000 miles on it. I was delivering pizza at the time and gas was money so I tracked it very closely.

  210. There's choices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Start here:
    http://www.afdc.doe.gov/afvehicles.html
    ht tp://www.fleets.doe.gov/

    It depends on your price range but if you got bucks to spend you can get/lease a Toyota Rav4 EV, range 100Mill per charge.

    http://rav4ev.toyota.com/consumer/rav4ev_0_home/ ra v_home.htm

  211. Re:Ethanol is no solution, it's part of the proble by Ian+Bicking · · Score: 4, Informative
    The first page of the sited article quotes exactly the given numbers:
    Pimentel's report, to be published in the 2001 edition of the Encyclopedia for Physical Sciences and Technology in September, says that producing ethanol is more trouble than it's worth: 131,000 British thermal units of energy are required to produce one gallon of ethanol, but a gallon will only give you about 77,000 Btu of fuel energy.

    In other words, producing ethanol results in a net loss of energy.

    So, I guess, ethanol is not a renewable energy source -- not because it is not renewable (it is), but because it is not an energy source.
  212. My $02 on Prius and Honda Civic Hybrid by MojoRilla · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have been researching Hybrids for the last year. U am also currently driving a Honda Accord. Here is what I have come up with. The Honda Insight is an engineering wonder. Everything is designed to be light. The word on the street is that this car will be discontinued at the end of this year [www.businessreport.com]. And if you have kids forget it, as it is only a two seater and doesn't have an airbag cutoff switch. The Toyota Prius is an interesting car. Advantages are that it is SULEV (at least in California), and that it can run off the electric battery without the engine running (at speeds lower than 30 mph). Disadvantages I saw on my test drive was that the first one I tried wouldn't start cause the battery had drained (don't know if it was a stupid dealer or design flaw). Also, I didn't like the center mounted speedometer or the weird shift (mounted on the dashboard). Finally, the Prius uses small low rolling resistiance tires, which people are complaining about. According to one post I saw, someone said they had to change tires at 14,000 miles. And since the tires are both small and low rolling resistiance, they are hard to find. Also, during my test drive, it seemed that the gas engine was revving really high at speeds of 40 to 50 mph. Another small nit is that the breaking is non-linear (it seems rather grippy when you press hard). Finally, I have been considering the Hybrid Civic. I have test driven this car twice, and I really like it. It seems to drive really well. Although it has low total horsepower, it acheived that horsepower at lower rpm, meaning that the accelleration felt pretty normal. The tires are bigger than the Prius, and it feels very much like a normal car. It is also quiet because the bottom of the car is insulated for better aerodynamics. One disadvantage is that, at $21,000 sticker price, this car is about $3000 over the price of a comparably equiped Civic. After driving all three of these, I am going with the Hybrid Civic. The IRS recently has announced a $2000 deduction for hybrid cars [detnews.com] Also, if you are interested in enviornmental issues, check out [www.greenercars.com]. It has green ratings for all the cars mentioned.

  213. nissan sentra by Guipo · · Score: 1

    nissan makes a polution free alternative. Its the nissan sentra CA. They only made them one or two years, but they put out 0 polution. And are ok in the carpool lane. They use regular gas too. They have a lifetime smog warrenty too. A really good deal.

    --
    Theonlyuse of monkeys is to testthings onthem.Some peoplemay say"Hey That'scruel!"and myresponse is"I don't like monkeys
  214. The probem needs to be defined by guanxi · · Score: 2

    If you're trying to just save gas money, then it's easy math.

    If you're trying to protect the environment, you must consider more complicated factors. I rarely see the following mentioned (esp. C); what other considerations are there?

    A) What pollution is output and what does each molecule do? How does 1 Kg CO2 compare to 1Kg methane? Locally? Globally? (see the summaries at http://www.ipcc.ch/ for a good answer)

    B) What pollution is output in the whole process or finding, extracting, refining, storing, transporting, burning and disposing of the fuel? What about the engine? For example, electric may burn clean in your car, but it shifts significant pollution to the power plant and the battery disposal yard.

    C) Is the pollution you add to the environment stuff that would end up there anyway (e.g. fuel made from trees, corn, etc.) or stuff that would otherwise stay buried forever (petroleum, natural gas, etc.)?


    If you care about human rights, poverty, etc. then you have even more to worry about: To whom am I giving money when I buy this fuel?

  215. Re:Ethanol is no solution, it's part of the proble by Jodka · · Score: 1, Troll

    "77,000 BTU of energy requires inputs totalling about 131,000 BTU (if memory serves)."

    I store this factoid in a more compact form, that the fuel consumed in the production of ethanol contains 1.7 times the enery as the ethanol. Which fits with the figures you give.

    By the way, those who can not obtain ethanol fuel at the pump can simulate the experience of driving on a gallon of ethanol using regular fossil fuel:
    1- Purchase 1.7 gallons of gasoline.
    2- Poor 1 gallon into your tank.
    3- Poor the remaining 0.7 gallons into nearby ditch. Ignite.

    Those after a more realistic experience can also send ADM a check, cut down trees and dump topsoil into a river. If anyone questions you, denounce them as a corporate whore of the fossil fuel industry then move to Nebraska and vote for Tom Daschle.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature.
  216. electric bicycles are cool by Pauly · · Score: 2

    Of course the electric bicycle that should be the most appealing to the slashdot crowd should be the Sparc.

  217. making up for all the environmental wackos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, the best milage I get is my truck which gets 17mpg when I'm "nice" to it. Course it is a diesel which helps. On the rest of my vehicles, the milages goes down, all the way to 3mpg in my street rod. I hope I can do my part to consume the fuel that the "do gooders" are saving. Also, I have all the size and power I could ever want, no cramping into a matchbox sized unconfortable POS for me.

    Long live the American freedom of choice!

  218. Let me Know when I can get a Truck by haplo21112 · · Score: 2

    Seriously I would love to drive a fuel efficent, or completely alternate fuel vehicle, however the current selection the cars are just to damned small. I am a big guy(not fat just widely built, I don't need extra airplane seats or anything), and the size of this class of vehicle is just to small for me to be comfortable...
    I drive a Regal because I am comfortable in one....

    --
    Power Corrupts,Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, leaving one person(group)in charge is absolutely corrupt.
  219. Re:Ethanol is no solution, it's part of the proble by JWW · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I wish the people of Nebraska would vote for Tom Daschle.

    Many of us in South Dakota would love to get rid of him. He's South Dakota's senator, not Nebraska's.

    Although I, along with many other South Dakotans, just wish he would go away. We'll see if he can continue to dupe people here to continue to vote for him in two years.

  220. Re:The Troll Polka: UPDATED by Google Translate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that not early post office? Yes! That is mine early post office!
    Is that a Goatse does not ghost? Yes! That is ghost my Goatse!
    Early post office, Goatse ghost,
    Oh, you beautiful, Oh, you beautiful, Oh, you beautiful,
    Slashdot sucks!

    Is post office RK minus one? Yes! That is RK minus one!
    Is trolling so much fun? Yes! Trolling is so fun!
    Minus one, trolling fun, Early post office, Goatse ghost,
    Oh, you beautiful, Oh, you beautiful, Oh, you beautiful,
    Slashdot sucks!

    Is that not big crapflood? Yes! That is big mine crapflood!
    Is it worthless Linux FUD? Yes! That is my Linux FUD!
    Big crapflood, Linux FUD, minus one, trolling fun, Early post office, Goatse ghost,
    Oh, you beautiful, Oh, you beautiful, Oh, you beautiful,
    Slashdot sucks!

    Is that not the CowBoiKneel? Yes! That is the CowBoiKneel!
    Is dis not his manchode meal? Yes! That is his manchode meal!
    CowBoiKneel, manchode meal, Big crapflood, Linux FUD, minus one, trolling fun, Early post office, Goatse ghost,
    Oh, you beautiful, Oh, you beautiful, Oh, you beautiful,
    Slashdot sucks!

    Is that not a WIPO Troll? Yes! That is the WIPO Troll!
    Is that a Goatse does not get? Yes! That is the Goatse gets!
    WIPO Troll, Goatse gets, CowBoiKneel, manchode meal, Big crapflood, Linux FUD, minus one, trolling fun, Early post office, Goatse ghost,
    Oh, you beautiful, Oh, you beautiful, Oh, you beautiful,
    Slashdot sucks!

    Is that not Jon Katz ' slave boys? Yes! That is Jon Katz ' slave boys!
    And acres they emergency Taco's sex toys? Yes! They of acres Taco's sex toys!
    Katz ' slave boys, Rob's sex toys, WIPO Troll, Goatse gets, CowBoiKneel, manchode meal, Big crapflood, Linux FUD, minus one, trolling fun, Early post office, Goatse ghost,
    Oh, you beautiful, Oh, you beautiful, Oh, you beautiful,
    Slashdot sucks!

    Is that not trolltalk thread? Yes! That is trolltalk thread!
    Is does not it now FUCKING DEAD? Yes! Is really FUCKING DEAD!
    Trolltalk thread, FUCKING DEAD! Katz ' slave boys, Rob's sex toys, WIPO Troll, Goatse gets, CowBoiKneel, manchode meal, Big crapflood, Linux FUD, minus one, trolling fun, Early post office, Goatse ghost,
    Oh, you beautiful, Oh, you beautiful, Oh, you beautiful,
    Slashdot sucks!

  221. Super cars that are ecco-friendly by the_tallman · · Score: 1
    Less on the practical side are the:

    AC Propulsion TZero
    http://www.rapidcars.com/tzero.html
    which is entirely battery powered and will out-accelerate the neighbor's Ferrari 355,

    and the strange but wonderful

    RinSpeed Advantage R
    http://www.rapidcars.com/advantager.html
    which features a moving cockpit and runs on household garbage, Back to The Future style.

    Ivan

    --
    There is no graceful way to eat an egg salad sandwich.
    1. Re:Super cars that are ecco-friendly by Quila · · Score: 2

      On the more practical side, the standard Lotus Elise, about 40 mpg with decent range and great performance. People freak when I tell them how much mileage I get.

  222. Sure they're funny-lookin'... by Skip666Kent · · Score: 2

    ...but it's best to keep it simple. Try a Toyota Echo. 30-40 mpg and it runs on gas so there's no huge batteries to go sour one day and have to be chucked and pollute the environment.

    --
    **>>BELCH
  223. Re:a couplet of ideas: My cycling experience by Prof_Dagoski · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've been doing the cycling thing ever since college. My experience is that a ten mile commute is very doable. The best part is that you wind up in killer shape from that. Ideally you'd live on the temperat west coast or the southwest. I dunno too much about the weather patterns of the Southeast, but I'll assume there's a couple of months out of the year where it's too hot to ride. When I lived on the west coast, my bike journeys were almost always in excess of eight miles due to various circumstances. Eight miles is pretty pleasant and fun unless you have to ride through mountains. Fifteen miles is doable, but not if you're on a tight time table and certainly not every day. Living out in the midwest the main problem I have is weight gain during the the two to three months where it's just too cold an snowy to ride. I find that if I'm dressed right, I can ride somewhat comfortably down to 15 degres F. After that I say F*** it. Getting back in spring takes a month before I'm totally with it. The other positive thing about cycling is that public transpotation is increasingly accomadating bikes. In Ann Arbor where I live the buses now have racks. In Philly where I'm going to be living, the trains let you bring bikes aboard during non-peak hours. This really extends your range. The other cool thing that I see happening in urban areas is that cities and conservation groups are making bike trails along rivers and other green ways. Depending on how they're laid out both can really cut down your time even if they don't cut down your mileage. No stoplights and no traffic after all. One not so postive development is that moutnain bike manufacturers are no longer putting brazings on frames for racks sturdy enough to mount panniers. The big thing right now is disc brakes whose fittings supplant those for racks. I replaced my panniers when they wore out with Dana Design Bomb Pack because it's a big day backpack that does not push your head downwards when you sit on the bike wearing a helmet. 'Course I'm still riding the same old bike, but I dream of getting a new one.

  224. Wrong! Think again by Malc · · Score: 1

    It's not the vegetation that was in the area before the dam was built, but what gets washed in to the resevoir later on. If managing the ecosystem is as easy as you proclaim, then why isn't it being done successfully already?

    As reported by the BBC in May 2000.

  225. Re:Why do you think electricity is better than fue by jchristopher · · Score: 1
    Why do people believe that using electric vehicles is better for the environment than fossil-fuel powered combustion-driven ones?

    One reason - did you know that quite a bit of pollution occurs at gas stations, as vapor from the nozzle and your tank escape into the atmosphere? Even though generating electricity to fuel cars pollutes as well, it can be far less since it all happens at one location (where it can be more easily handled) than at a variety of poorly maintained gas stations.

  226. Do you really need... by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

    ...two cars? That is the real question.

    In a lot of families, at least one car is used solely for commuting to work. 1/2 hour each way, and the rest of the time it sits, unused in the parking lot or driveway.

    Finding an alternate way to work for one member frees up the car for the other person on kid hauling duty, or if they have a long commute to work. I've managed to do that several times, for long periods of time. Bike, bus, carpool, whatever. A 2 car family can turn into a one car family.

    1 minivan and a bike (or bus) gets better gas mileage than two Insights. And is far easier on YOUR wallet.

  227. Another Prius recommendation by JoeD · · Score: 1

    My wife and I got one for her about a month ago. The more I drive it, the more I like it.

    It handles very well, the steering is very responsive. It has a very tight turning radius - I can make a complete U-turn in a standard residentail street. And of course, the gas mileage is really great.

    I only have 2 minor nits to pick with it.

    The shift lever is in a somewhat non-standard position on the dash, and obscures some of the radio controls from the view of the driver.

    And the gas gauge is wildly inaccurate - when it reads 3/4 full, you really have about 1/4 tank, and when the low gas warning chime goes off, you have about 5 miles left instead of the 30 or 40 you get in most cars.

    But those are really very minor complaints, and if I had to replace my car today (my wife drives the Prius), I'd get another one.

  228. atlanta by Pauly · · Score: 2
    Hrm... I haven't seen a Sparrow in Atlanta.
    E*Evoloution sells Corbin Sparrows in Atlanta.

    Bicycling in Atlanta, however, is a death wish.

    You're not kidding. Even though it is considerably popular here in Chicago (we have a very pro-bicycle mayor and many active riders), I still consider urban bicycling here to be an extreme sport.

    Also, consider lending your support to the Atlanta Bicycle Campaign. From their homepage:

    "The Atlanta Bicycle Campaign is a member-supported organization working for better on-road bicycling conditions in metro-Atlanta. We believe that truly healthy communities welcome bicyclists and provide a safe riding environment. We promote bicycle transportation, responsible recreational riding, and education for bicyclists and motorists alike."

  229. Why Own? by Indiana · · Score: 1


    I'm a big fan of the Prius. However, if you're in the city, why own? I drive the Prius, in addition to many other cars, through my local car co-op:

    http://www.zipcar.com

    This will work for people that need a car for short errands in Boston, New York, DC, and recently Denver. You reserve a car in advance by phone or by the web. The zipcar density in Boston/Cambridge is so high that I have never been unable to find a car nearby when I needed it.

    It also looks like there are a few car co-ops in the orginal poster's area:

    http://www.carsharing.net/where.html

    While this is sounding like a bit of a love story, I should close by saying that I used to own a car in the city and the insurance payments alone were murder, (not counting the gas a maintainace costs). And every major car repair was the cost of a new bicycle, so now I just bike and zipcar everywhere.

    --
    "The explanatory command for unix is man." Chauvinism or bitter irony? Discuss.....
  230. www.hempcar.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unmodified car drove across america running on hemp. I would recommend all you conservative twats think about the legality of hemp, as it can be used to mold-injected parts, fuel, food, etc, without "getting you high."

    I don't smoke pot, but I fight every inch I can for the legalization of hemp. One of the big reasons its outlawed is that it would devastate some major industries (such as oil/coal). Everyone else legalized hemp to grow for industrial purposes, why not us?

  231. Very simple solution. by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2
    Bear in mind that the worst environmental damage is done by actually making the car, not running it. Even big cars with long design lifespans (Volvo 240-series are designed to last for 22 years) will never consume as much energy as was used in their construction.

    What to do, then? Go and buy an old car. Make sure it's in mechanically good condition when you get it, and service it regularly. You can do this yourself, at home, easily. You can buy an inexpensive workshop manual that will tell you about simple servicing right the way up to complex overhauls. If you choose a good car in the first place, it will last a long time, and if it's serviced and tuned correctly, the emissions will be far lower than most new catalyst-equipped cars.

    The problem is that on short journeys, at low speed, the catalyst never gets hot enough to work properly. This results in that nasty "rotten egg" smell you get. Unfortunately, these low speed short journeys tend to be what people do most in town, which is just when you need the emissions to be cleanest.

    So, in short, choose an old-ish (10-15 years) car that's in reasonably good condition. Don't pay more than about #500 for one, though. Get a workshop manual. Get decent tools. Learn to use them - you're a geek, aren't you? It's fun, rewarding, and good for the environment. You don't need to worry about depreciation, and even if you just scrap the car when it eventually packs in, you've only lost a few hundred quid, not the thousands you'd lose in depreciation on a new car.

  232. Audi A2 TDI by maitas · · Score: 1

    The second best mpg car in the world is the A2 TDI. I need 2.8 litres per kilometer (sorry, I'm not a Yankee :)
    The best car there is the Wolskvagen Lupo 3L that needs about 2.4 litres per kilometer.
    Better than the Insight or Prius! Besides, you can use biodiesel!

    1. Re:Audi A2 TDI by maddskillz · · Score: 1

      Actually, I am sure you mean 2.8 liters per 100 kilometers From a happy TDI owner

  233. just curious by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    But why does it have to go faster than 65?

  234. Ford Think City by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think! is a beautifully designed and produced Scandinavian car. The company was purchased by Ford Europe last year. See: http://www.thinkmobility.com

    Other links:
    http://snapp.hiof.no/think/
    http://snapp. hiof.no/think/2002/
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group /think_ev/
    http://www.geocities.com/think_ev/

  235. Re:making up for all the environmental wackos? by SSRSSR · · Score: 1

    > Long live the American freedom of choice! Yep, go ahead, it's your right, and you can accept the consequences of doing so. But, don't look for me at the gas station, when gas his $3 a gallon. My electric car doesn't need gas, goes where I want, when I want, and meets all my needs for 50 cents a day of electricity. That's my choice.

  236. They are already selling it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or at least delivering it. I saw someone pick one up at a Honda dealer two weeks ago when I dropped a friend off for some service. It clearly says hybrid on the right rear.

    It's a joke, gets about the same mileage as the old Civic HX. It also takes something like 13 or 15 seconds or something to hit 60mph.

  237. What about the batteries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How long do those batteries last, and what happens to them when they die?

  238. Toyota Rav4 EV in California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.rav4evcurrents.com/newsletter.asp

    i test drove one, it's a lot of fun. 100 mile range, and ~80mph, i think.

  239. Another couple sides of the coin by haplo21112 · · Score: 2

    Not directly related to the cars themselves, but wouldn't it be better to eliminate the long distance driving all together. Save on Gas an energy all around.

    First Mass Transit baby, more trains. Give me the ability to ride my bike to a train station and then take a train to the general location where I work, and then ride the bike the last mile so to speak...

    Trains run on Electricity. Generate that from natural sources, wind, water, solar got a building going up require it to have a certian surface percentage covered in solar panels. Put wind turbines on tall structures like industrial Chimmenys, and radio towers. Stuff like that....

    --
    Power Corrupts,Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, leaving one person(group)in charge is absolutely corrupt.
  240. Re:If I were in your shoes....(diesel, pollution) by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    There are two big issues about diesel emissions, and I'd enjoy reading about how they're addressed (hint, hint - any auto engineers reading this?)

    First, they just plain burn hotter, so other things being equal you get more oxides of nitrogen. Are there catalysts to take care of that? Will they work with US diesel, which is higher in sulfur than what Europeans buy?

    Second, they're burning a fine mist of fuel as opposed to a gaseous mix. The soot from lower-tech diesels comes from burning the outside of droplets and charring the inside. The old-fashioned solution was to have a swirl chamber near the cylinder to evaporate more of the fuel. How do direct-injection diesels get the relatively low-soot performance that they do?

  241. I prefer my... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Canyonero. Wow, it *is* roomy!

  242. Electric Car worth Driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever want to race NSXs and Vipers? Well, here's an electric car that can smoke them in the 1/8 mile. It has 200 HP for a car that is only 2400lbs, and it has a range of 100 miles when driven at 60 MPH. For the long halls they make a trailer with a gasoline generator. Sounds like the car for me.

    http://www.acpropulsion.com/tzero_pages/tzero_ho me .htm

    Check it out.

  243. Isn't biodiesel hard on the fuel system? by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 2

    The last time I heard about biodiesel, the people who were promoting it mentioned offhand that it's tough on the fuel system and might require some parts of a standard diesel engine to be reworked to avoid long term damage. Have you heard anything about that?

    --

    What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

    1. Re:Isn't biodiesel hard on the fuel system? by TrumpetPower! · · Score: 1

      Blockquoth the Crow:

      The last time I heard about biodiesel, the people who were promoting it mentioned offhand that it's tough on the fuel system and might require some parts of a standard diesel engine to be reworked to avoid long term damage. Have you heard anything about that?

      Biodiesel eats through some of the hoses and other plastic / rubber parts of the system quicker than does petroleum diesel. There are replacement parts that don't have the problem. They cost a bit more and aren't needed for petroleum diesel so they aren't included with stock diesel systems.

      I can't speak from experience, but, if I owned a diesel car, I'd just pay closer-than-normal attention for leaky hoses and replace them with sturdier ones when they failed earlier than they otherwise would have. If you're more paranoid than me, you'd just replace them all up front.

      b&

      --
      All but God can prove this sentence true.
  244. Electric Lotus Elise by nut · · Score: 1

    I have to mention it, even though they don't actually sell them, just because they are out and away the sexiest electric car you can imagine (if you can imagine such a thing.)
    I'm talking about the Zytek Electric Lotus Elise, of course.

    --
    Never trust a man in a blue trench coat, Never drive a car when you're dead
    1. Re:Electric Lotus Elise by Quila · · Score: 2

      That's what I thought. Why the Tzero which has questionable styling, and an interior that looks both spartan and very ugly? You can just take an already ultralight, beautiful Elise and drop an electric motor in it.

      I drive a gas-powered one every day, and you can't beat the pure driving enjoyment. I wouldn't mind plugging it in instead of filling it up, except I'd miss the engine sounds.

  245. Common sense vehicles by Marasmus · · Score: 2

    Geo Metro with a tune-up. Including the tune-up, it might cost you $250. :) Good mileage (45-55 mpg), but power is gonna suck. 55 horsepower.

    Late-80's fuel-injected Honda Civic 5-speed with the A/C compressor belt removed... 35mpg city, 40-45 highway. Had one for many years. Absolutely loved it. It'll do 80mph very comfortably and top out about 100mph. Even when it was out of tune and needed work, I got 0.00% emissions across the board. Extremely clean-burning car. 95 horsepower.

    Civic HX w/manual transmission... They've made the HX for like 8 years, so it's a VERY established car. Uses a variable 3- or 4- valve per cylinder combustion implementation (VTEC variant) in order to yield excellent combustion efficiency with near-zero unburnt gasoline. Since it still has the good ole' 4 valve per cylinder setup available for high-load situations, you can floor it and still get decent pickup and ~110mph top speed. 40mpg or more, unless you don't know how to drive. If you also unhook the belt to your A/C compressor, you will probably be able to hit 50mpg on highway. Their transmissions are so well-made that they're often fitted onto performance Civics, since they've got excellent gearing and are practically indestructable. This vehicle is still cheaper than the hybrids of all manufacturers by a few thousand bucks. about 110 horsepower, if I remember correctly.

    A small-displacement motorcycle! Get a 250-400cc street bike that has some decent horsepower and is light-weight and you'll get 70mpg every day of the week. It'd also save you a TON of money, as you can easily pick up such bikes new for as low as $5000. Anywhere from 18 to 30 horsepower. 1/2 the hp of the metro with 1/6 of the weight... these are no slouches when it comes to acceleration. Top speed will range from 60mph to 80mph, depending on the bike's design.

    --
    .... um, i lost you after "0110100001101001".
  246. Toyota RAV4-EV by satsujin · · Score: 1

    The Toyota RAV4-EV is a pure electric SUV type car. It's currently available only in California however. Toyota has worked out a deal with the Caltrans (people who maintan the roads out here) and drivers of the RAV4-EV can use the carpool lanes, without having a full car, and do not have to pay bridge tolls.

    Here's the link to their site

    http://rav4ev.toyota.com/consumer/rav4ev_0_home/ ra v_home.htm

    -sj

  247. Re:Ethanol (getting even further Off Topic) by Cy+Guy · · Score: 1

    Sidebar: what about the organized labor lobby for highway workers who pour asphalt every four years on every major road in the US? ... The cost is half as much, and has twice the durability. So there would be less asphalt produced, and half the labor needed.

    Actually, I have always heard that the reason for this is that the car companies depend on potholes and frostheaves, etc. to wear away at the cars so that typically they fall apart before 150k miles. Meanwhile a certain number of additional lives are lost each year as a result of people swerving to avoid potholes, but that's just part of the cost of doing business right?

  248. Civic Hybrid by dachshund · · Score: 1
    Of course, the Civic Hybrid's mileage is nothing special. 51MPG on the highway is pretty damn good for a car of that size, but it's nothing special when compared to smaller vehicles. I have a more traditionally powered Civic CX that gets about 48MPG on the highway (or at least, it did when I first bought it a decade ago :). The Insight gets 68MPG, I believe (which is really impressive).

    The obvious tradeoff here is size for fuel-efficiency, but that's really something to consider carefully if you're specifically looking for an "eco-friendly" car. In other words, depending on your preferences, it might not make sense to buy a heavy but fuel-efficient vehicle when you could get better mileage in a relatively in-efficient compact car.

  249. Re:making up for all the environmental wackos? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and look like a little eco-bitch driving it :)

  250. Re:Insight, if you are careful - what batt. prob? by Insightfill · · Score: 1
    I've got one and also visit the yahoo boards all the time, and have never heard of anyone replacing the battery pack. It's stock-warranteed for 8 yrs, anyway. One problem that is noted for the 5 spds is a periodic "recalibration" where the charging unit and the estimated charge disagree, and the car disables the "assist" for a few miles while it recharges the batteries. This is fairly common among the 5spds because the drivers tend to really deplete the batteries more heavily, and the battery graph on the dash only estimates the state of charge based on flow, not the true voltage. When the two values get too far out of sync. Voila - recalibration. I've never had one happen in my CVT model.

    The battery pack consists of 120 D-cell NiMH batteries, and the charge/discharge cycle never fully depletes or fully charges them, in order to preserve their lives. The user battery graph only shows a narrow middle section of this charge, so a reading of "full" is actually ~90% charged, and it won't charge any more than that.

    What has been noted occasionally is an O2 sensor alert on the dash, and quite a few have been replaced, but it's not clear yet whether the units are going bad or being damaged by something further up the engine. No recall, yet.

    Weight limit: The car has a limit of ~350 pounds for the passenger, driver and cargo. That's two people at 175. Actually, I've topped at closer to 400 occasionally and nothing happens. I think they just don't want people hauling bricks in it or something - people tend to abuse hatchbacks ;)

    Yup, it dings easy. Honda dropped the ball by not at least putting on a little rubber strip on the doors in order to stop the dings in parking lots. No argument there. I guess it's the price for an all-aluminum car designed to be light.

  251. what about a car running on air? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.aircar.ag

  252. Don't forget the Honda Civic Hybrid by avi4now · · Score: 1

    You listed the Prius and the Insight, but not the newest hybrid on the market: the Civic.

    I haven't driven any of these cars, but from what I've read it's the only hybrid that's actually a normal car that happens to be a hybrid, as opposed to a hybrid that's a car.

  253. Re:Ethanol is no solution, it's part of the proble by Darnit · · Score: 1

    You should mean Osborne. Tom Osborne is who we all like to vote for.

  254. Re:a couplet of ideas: My cycling experience by Nyarly · · Score: 1
    I dunno too much about the weather patterns of the Southeast, but I'll assume there's a couple of months out of the year where it's too hot to ride.

    Only if you're a pansy.

    --
    IP is just rude.
    Is there any torture so subl
  255. Don't touch a diesel with a barge-pole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here in Europe we are cursed with the damn things. Their exhausts contain the most carcinogenic compounds known to man and only now are the morons we elect begining to acknowledge the fact.
    Import a Lotus Elise; surprisingly fuel efficient and ideal for nipping past those evil diesels.

    Alex.

    1. Re:Don't touch a diesel with a barge-pole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lotus elise is not approved for use onroad in the US.

      its too light and doesnt meet crash standards

      it is too bad!

    2. Re:Don't touch a diesel with a barge-pole by Apiakun · · Score: 0

      Strange, I saw one driving around Atlanta about 2 1/2 weeks ago...

    3. Re:Don't touch a diesel with a barge-pole by ProfBooty · · Score: 1

      http://www.fantasycars.com/1/2002/EliseUSA/eliseus a.html

      its out at a 2003 model, but not before then

      of course they raised the price in the US market

      --
      Bring back the old version of slashdot.
  256. Re:Wrong! Think again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course I would immediately wonder what happens to the veggies that don't get stuck behind a dam. Do they get washed somewhere else and rot anyway, emitting methane? And what about natuaral lakes, some of which will obviously also have this problem? Don't you think that singling out man-made lakes is silly?

  257. RAV4 EV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If one is in the market for an electric car, look at the Toyota RAV4 EV. The dealer around the corner from me in Hollywood (Toyota Of Hollywood) sells them and I see them driving around LA. (There is no spare tire mounted on the door. It's under the car where the exhaust/gastank/rear diff usually sits.)

    http://rav4ev.toyota.com/consumer/rav4ev_0_home/ ra v_home.htm

    Only available in California. And they are the old style design, but drive just like a regular RAV4. (Which is very carlike.) Plus, you can haul your Ikea furniture home without burning any gas. :-)

    I was next to one in my car the other day and just loved the soft whir they make as they drive away.

  258. Re:Wrong! Think again by kevinank · · Score: 2
    If managing the ecosystem is as easy as you proclaim, then why isn't it being done successfully already?

    It has and is being done successfully. The majority of countries with problems are extremely poor and have built without consideration of social and environmental impact, just as these same countries destroy rain forest with as little consideration of the same issues. Read some of the texts you cite and you will see that many of the environmentalists call not for an end to dam construction, but for a moratorium until these countries resolve these issues.

    In that respect I agree with the environmentalists. A good coal powered plant with adequate scrubbing facilities is better than a poorly run dam, probably in all respects.

    --
    LibBT: BitTorrent for C - small - fast - clean (Now Versio
  259. Re:Ethanol and CO vs. CO2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought it was the CO (carbon monoxide) emissions, not the CO2 (carbon dioxide) emissions that everyone should worry about.

  260. EPA List by avi4now · · Score: 1

    The EPA has a list of vehicles by how "green" they are.

    It looks like Ford has a 100% electric Ranger and Toyota has an electic RAV-4.

  261. Safety Warning! by dmarien · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    i hate silent cars though. they're too easy to walk in front of...

    --
    dmarien
  262. Bipeds by skydude_20 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    or bicycles? I know the 50 miles is easily do-able, but that 65 mph might be a little tough at times...

    --
    Jesus saves souls and redeems them for valuable cash prizes
  263. suggestions by uncoveror · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    May I suggest getting a bicycle, or a horse?

    --
    The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
  264. A Honda alternative not on your list by Catbeller · · Score: 2

    Another alternative, and perhaps one closer in functionality to your old Accord, is the 2002 Honda Civic Hybrid:

    The Honda Civic Hybrid home page

    The Edmunds Review

    It has four seats, four doors, gets mileage somewhere between 40-70 MPG, can get out of its own way, and is only US$20,000.

    It runs on gasoline, but uses a dual electric motor/gas engine setup. So refueling will be infrequent and convenient.

    Until a breakthrough in battery tech happens, this is the almost-best we can do. And you can buy it today.

  265. Re:Jetta TDI has better mileage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    While not the car answer the story might be looking for, there is a diesel- electric hybrid *motorcycle* being developed by an American company-- Ecycle - http://www.ecycle.com/powersports/hybrid.htm

    "Employing state-of-the-art mechanical and electrical design technology, eCycle is developing a 180mpg motorcycle. The motorcycle features a 219cc direct injected diesel engine and a 8kW electric motor drive. The weight of the motorcycle is 230lbs, with a top speed of 80mph and acceleration of 0-60 mph in 6 seconds. The target retail price is $5,000."

    Last I read you can order one now, for slightly more, before their main production starts this year.

  266. 100000 mile Nuclear fuel cell car!!! by nexusone · · Score: 1

    I am waiting for my nuclear powered De Lorean, with time trival option. :-)

    --
    Wise men speak because they have something to say, Fools because they have to say something!!!!
  267. HempCar!!!! by rd · · Score: 1
  268. Re:Jetta TDI has better mileage by LogicBroker · · Score: 1
    Offtopic here, but I gotta ask this. Is there anyone over 6'3" that can drive any of the newer (post 98) VWs? I'm 6'4" and have 'normal' length legs and my knees are jammed against the dashboard / underneath the steering column when I drove all the VW's on the lot. (Golf, Jetta, even the Passat).

    And yes, I know that the seats move back. ;)

    Back to the fuel economy debate...

  269. MCC Smart Car by dancote · · Score: 2, Informative

    Neat little European 2-seater made in a collaboration between Mercedes and Swatch. They are very nicely appointed and have a wide choice of engines including a turbodiesel. All get excellent fuel mileage. They are not available in the U.S. through a dealer network yet - I've heard possibly 2003. There's a guy in Florida who has figured out how to bring them into the country and even claims he's been able to get them registered in a small number of states. Problem is he's price-gouging to the max. Too bad

  270. Why not air??? by noproblema · · Score: 1

    Why not try this

  271. Th!nk or Smart by g4dget · · Score: 2
    The Ford Th!nk and DaimlerChrysler Smart car may be feasible choices. They are small, reach highway speeds (barely), and have a range of more than 50 miles (again, barely). They are easy to park, too.

    Another choice might be the Toyota Electric RAV 4, an electric SUV for commuters.

    I would not consider a parallel drive hybrid: the mechanical complexity of having both the electric and the gasoline motor drive the car must be high, and you can get pure gasoline cars with equivalent mileage. Unfortunately, most (all?) current choice for gas/electric hybrids are parallel drive.

    1. Re:Th!nk or Smart by twinpot · · Score: 1

      The current Smart, which is not officially avaialble in the US, will quite easily reach highway speeds. Available in both Diesel (90mpg!) and Petrol versions (~55mpg). You can get them chipped and de-limited, so they'll do over 100mph.

      All come with a 6 speed sequential semi-automatic gearbox, ABS, traction control, airbags etc, and are as safe as a C Class Mercedes.

      As a previous poster mentioned, a guy in Florida seems to be able to get them in. In the future, there will be Electric and Hybrid versions, as well as a sports car.

  272. Re:Wrong! Think again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    The poor countries in the world can hardly be expected to take more expensive options when the richest nation in the world and by far the biggest polluter per capita, the United States, refuses to take similar action itself.

    </political rant>

  273. Re:Honda Insight! (70mpg, D/E Hybrid, No Rechargin by AnonymousCowhand · · Score: 1

    the Insight is not a *diesel* hybrid - it uses gasoline.

    --
    --- Ask me about my Sig -- it's a 9mm.
  274. LPG and oil by nullard · · Score: 2

    LPG does not was away your oil. In fact, it is better for your oil than gasoline. I think LPG converted vehicles change oil at 10k miles rather than 3k miles -- and the oil comes out clear. Gasoline is corrosive.

    --


    t'nera semordnilap
    1. Re:LPG and oil by Tower · · Score: 1

      Many new cars are at 5k, 7500 or 10k miles between oil changes (especially with semi or full synthetic).

      --
      "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
    2. Re:LPG and oil by nullard · · Score: 1

      Many new cars are at 5k, 7500 or 10k miles between oil changes (especially with semi or full synthetic).

      I was reffering to older (early 90's?) cars that required 3k miles between oil changes. These older cars are more likely to be LPG converted than new cars since it voids the warranty. Most passenger car LPG conversions are done by enthusiasts working on their own cars -- often not their main car.

      --


      t'nera semordnilap
    3. Re:LPG and oil by Darnit · · Score: 1

      Engines that run on propane are amazingly wear free after 100,000 miles. Tear one down if it has always run on propane and you will likely still see the original honing marks on the side of the cylinder. It will be clean also. No nasty buildup in the cylinder.

  275. Re:Wrong! Think again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Singling out man-made lakes is not silly, as they can make conditions worse. I'm sure natural lakes can be bad, which is why human action that changes their size could also be undesirable. As the research indicated, the output from a resevoir can exceed that the output from the original river. There are forseeable methods that the existing ecosystem might employ that deals with the veggies without causing the same issues, e.g. flood plains, or comsumption by organisms such as plankton in the oceans.

  276. ya, what happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    --I used to have a two seater, rear engine/drive fiat spyder. 1969 model if I am remembering correctly. I got 60 mpg with it. It only had an 850 cc motor, would go about 70 tops. was wicked fun to drive around, and a sheer dream to work on. I rebuilt the engine and transmission when I got it (bought it as a non running junker), everything was like a car should be, easy to reach, no weird ass tools that are dealer only tools, no pollution nothing on it, it just worked, and very well. No computers,no electronic nothing really for the motor, regular old points. had toggle switches on the dash to turn the electronics on, with the appropriate fuse right below them, easily accessible.

  277. New idea in Hybrid vehicles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My idea for a hybrid vehicle is an all electric car with a turbine (diesel or gas) engine to run a bank of alternators.
    Turbines run best at a constant speed/load, which Chrysler found out with the 50's turbine car projects. Having a computer controlled turbine power source with electric drive would solve this. A set of batteries (about what the Insite has) would be for high battery load conditions and accessories in the car.
    maX_

  278. hypercars by seney · · Score: 1
    here's the link

    and here's link concerning the powertrain:

    here

    fuel cells!

    check out natural capitalism

    turn off that tv, save some power, and read.

  279. Smog index by wbajzek · · Score: 1

    I also was intrigued by the VWs when I was car shopping this weekend. However, it seems that although they get twice the gas mileage, they put out 3 or 4 times the emissions. If you want good mileage, they're a good car. If you're trying to be environmentally friendly, they're not.

    1. Re:Smog index by Mydron · · Score: 1

      Yes, this is would be a good argument if it was based on fact.

      Here is a detailed discussion regarding TDI emissions: here

      We don't have anyone to blame for these emissions except ourselves and our elected government. The fact is most of these emissions are due to the exceedingly crappy refining standards for diesel fuels in the US. Fuel quality is far higher in Europe where impurities are all far lower since they've been removed from the fuel before they arrive at the pump. Sure, this may not change your mind and you may be tempted to dismiss the thought but we all breathe in the emissions from heavy trucks that use diesel. What kind of diesel emissions do you want to breathe in?

      If that doesn't turn your crank, how about using biodiesel in your TDI: requires no conversion, just the challenge of finding a pump. But that's worth it right? Or is saving the environment only interesting if its also easy? Biodiesel is now commercially available in major metro areas, you just have to find it.

      Mechanical Engineering's Take on Diesel
      Note where VW has to import Euro Diesel to showcase its cars in the US
      VW's take
      A whole whack of info on the future of [bio]diesel

  280. Re:Fuel per acre by Daeslin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Not sure what the bushel of corn/ gallon of ethonal ratio is, but the fuel used per acre in the earlier post is definately off.

    On my dad's farm, you can get around 100 and some odd bushel per acre. I think it might have been around 160/acre but its been a while. Since an acre is only something like 233 feet square, its not going to take driven feet to pass it. Some time operators like my dad use equipment that covers 15 feet per pass. Bigger operators use machinery that'll cover 2, 4 even 6 times that much (albiet with lower fuel efficiencies). And tractors get suprisingly good milage considering the torque that they generate.

    Using modern farming practices such as no till or low till, you don't touch the field very often, so that comes out to 3-5 passes over the field in a year. Likewise, to try and keep costs low, any solvent farmer only puts on those chemicals needed in the portions needed, so that's declining. In fact, there're starting to get to the point where they can combine GPS and lots of soil samples with computerized applicators to vary the amount of chemicals over each acre to boost efficiencies as much as possible.

    Anyway, thought someone may find that of interest.

    --

    I like lots of people. That doesn't mean I go carting them around the galaxy with me. --Dr. Who
  281. Honda Hybrid by christowang · · Score: 1

    I've seen a few of these around lately. Two of them I have seen broken down on the side of the road. For being a new car this seems like a high number for the few I see on the road.

  282. Personal Experience by Atryn · · Score: 1

    My wife and I purchased a Toyota Prius and took delivery in March. We LOVE it! I highly recommend this car. At the rate that Toyota is subsidizing them, it is very affordable.

    If you so choose, you can keep the energy monitor on and set goals for yourself on efficiency, etc. But if you just want a car that is better for the environment, you don't have to pay any attention. We are getting consistently about 47 mpg and over 500 miles per tank of gas.

    --
    Come play Moral Decay!
  283. hybrid vehicles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    article about gas-electric hybrids

    http://carpoint.msn.com/advice/standardart.aspx? co ntentid=4020586&src=404

  284. ATTN: AC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    shouldn't you be reading the Bible or out burning a cross in some African-American family's yard now instead of posting to /. ? "Street rod", indeed. How's life in the trailer park, Elmo? Shoot yourself any raccoon for supper?

  285. Cranky suggestion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, there really isn't a decent answer to this question.

    Electric cars just suck, and that is due to the crappy energy density of today's batteries, which is a problem that just doesn't go away no matter how hard you try to ignore it.

    An example of ignoring the problem? Driving an EV-1!

    If you want to drive a more environmentally friendly vehicle, then get a practical hybrid sedan like the Prius or the new Civic Hybrid. Or get a modern diesel. Or wait for something tiny like the Smart to be sold in the US, hopefully with diesel or a diesel hybrid engine. Or, if you are feeling cheap, get yourself a used Geo Metro...

    Or better yet, try and convince your representatives to get behind a raise in the CAFE fuel efficiency standards or an end to the SUV/light truck exemptions.

    'Cause unless something changes, Americans will just continue driving big heavy gas-guzzlers until either the Saudis decide to spank us again like '73, or we just get to the place in the global oil production curve that Hubbert predicted so long ago. i.e.: The end of the cheap easy oil and the unforgiving rise in price.

    Oh, but if nothing changes, I suppose a few people will still get to toodle about in their aging EV-1s, feeling smugly self-righteous...

  286. Roll Your Own by lazarus · · Score: 1

    Why not? Pat Beirne did. Pat is the former Chief Engineer at Corel, and when he got tired of polluting, he bought himself a Mazda Miata and converted it. PEN has a brief article about it as well.

    --
    I am not interested in articles about life extension advancements.
  287. ultimate alternative fuel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Air powered vehicles... :)

    http://www.bellwetherinteractive.com/mdi/

  288. Metro round-up by eostrom · · Score: 1

    Metro ("Silicon Valley's Weekly Newspaper") recently did an article about environmentally friendly cars, including an evaluation of several models. It's not Consumer Reports, but it does have some interesting points, like the fact that the Civic Hybrid pollutes exactly as much as a regular old Civic EX.

  289. Alternative Fuel vehicles by folsomev · · Score: 1

    The RAV4 EV meets your requirements. You should certainly check it out. See http://rav4ev.toyota.com/

  290. Re:Insight, if you are careful (MISINFORMATION) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had an insight for 2 1/2 years. No battery pack replacements. It performs flawlessly. The battery pack and associated tech. is also waranteed for 8 years/80,000 miles.

    There is a recommended passenger/cargo weight limit of 350 pounds. However, I have FREQUENTLY exceeded this recommended limit with no adverse affects (besides slightly lower mileage while loaded down, which will happen in ANY car).

    No dings. And I'm not careful with my car. Your "friend" must be just totally abusive to his.

  291. Re:Ethanol is no solution, it's part of the proble by RobinH · · Score: 2

    131,000 British thermal units of energy are required to produce one gallon of ethanol, but a gallon will only give you about 77,000 Btu of fuel energy

    One REALLY big question... does the 131,000 BTU figure include the energy absorbed from the sun?

    --
    "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
  292. State of PA offering money for alterna-fuel cars! by Nuke+Skyjumper · · Score: 1

    Looks like some people in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania have their heads screwed on straight. They're offering grant money to those who buy alternative-fuel vehicles. The story was actually posted today on theautochannel.com.

  293. Flashlight battery powered car by obtuse · · Score: 1

    Did you say the Insight uses D-cells? HAH! The car runs on 120 flashlight batteries!

    I'm sure it's quite economical to use such a commodity, but it still sounds like the engineering work of a bright eight year old.

    --
    Assembly is the reverse of disassembly.
    1. Re:Flashlight battery powered car by Insightfill · · Score: 1
      You're not too far off the mark.

      The batteries used are really high capacity industrial Panasonic batteries (couldn't find the exact mAh rating) and retail for about $3-4/each.

      But, yes, they could also run a flashlight. Actually, the whole pack of them makes 144 volts DC, so if you can cycle it, you could also run som appliances.

      But it is something else.

      (You should see the hamsters under the hood!)

    2. Re:Flashlight battery powered car by Insightfill · · Score: 1
      My bad - the batteries are 6500mA capacity - really heavy duty.

      http://www.panasonic.com/industrial/battery/oem/ch em/nicmet/index.html look for the ones at the bottom of the first table in the link.

      They're closer to $10-$15 each!

  294. Those aren't alternative fuel vehicles, but... by aduthie · · Score: 1

    these are. If you want to stick with pure electric, you might consider two more options:

    The Corbin Sparrow II is a small electric three-wheeled thing built in CA.

    And the Th!nk City, built by a company purchased recently by Ford, is available for demonstration lease in California now -- evidently for only $200 per month. (You're already familiar with such leases, since you've got an EV1.) Pretty sure it won't meet your top speed requirement, though.

    1. Re:Those aren't alternative fuel vehicles, but... by metachimp · · Score: 1

      If anyone wants to to check out the TH!NK cars, you can rent 'em in Las Vegas... They're all over the place down there...

      --
      The system has failed you, don't fail yourself. --Billy Bragg
  295. Another Alternative by jamesl · · Score: 1

    Or, you can buy a Honda Interceptor (VFR) motorcycle. 800cc, 0-60 in 3.1 seconds. 150mph top speed (reported). 50mpg (observed).

    Have a gas while saving gas.

    1. Re:Another Alternative by mrv · · Score: 1

      If you're looking at motorcycles... and don't mind beta-testing...

      http://www.ecycle.com/powersports/hybrid.htm
      Th e eCycle is a diesel/electric hybrid motorcycle, which should yield ~180MPG.
      219cc direct injected diesel engine and a 8kW electric motor drive. The weight of the motorcycle is 230lbs, with a top speed of 80mph and acceleration of 0-60 mph in 6 seconds. Estimated top speed of 80mph.

      --
      -mrv
  296. Re:Wrong! Think again by kevinank · · Score: 1
    Oh, the US has been in the thrall of big business for the last twenty or thirty years. The Kyoto fiasco is just an anomaly of GW's pseudo-election and his being about ten times as compromised by business as Clinton was. These things go in cycles; after four years I'll hope for a strong enough backlash to elect someone I like into office.

    The Dems are crazy if they don't realize that where they lost the election wasn't so much in FL as it was in NH. The real problem is that they've sold out and until someone with some balls steps forward to put a word in for the people who hate this corporatization of democracy, they will keep on losing. I don't mind GW so much; at least when he sells his soul he is whoring in a long tradition. When Gore does the same thing it makes me sick that we are left with only the choice between two equally compromised sides.

    --
    LibBT: BitTorrent for C - small - fast - clean (Now Versio
  297. Sadly, no. by daviddennis · · Score: 2

    The Toyota Echo has the same body as the Prius, and sells for about $10,000 less, say $10-12k instead of $20k and up. The mileage difference is only about 10-15mpg.

    I did the numbers and came out with the rather alarming conclusion that you will never recoup the cost of the Prius in fuel savings, because the car includes expensive batteries that need to be replaced every ten years or so. When the car has been driven for ten years, the batteries are going to cost more than the depreciated value of the car. (This is not surprising considering how heavily subsidized the car is, a point made in other posts).

    Car magazine (UK)'s monthly car cost and capsule rating section claims that the Prius is going to get about the same mileage as a diesel, and rides and handles poorly compared to the diesel VW Golf, which costs about the same. Motor Trend magazine, in an issue I bought about a week ago that's probably still on newsstands somewhere, agrees and much prefers the Honda Civic Hybrid. So if you need a hybrid car, I'd recommend the Honda.

    Finally, in terms of saving the planet, the whole thing may be a wash. From what I understand, disposing of lead acid batteries of the size needed for an hybrid or electric car is a significant environmental hazard.

    In the end, I'd probably take the Golf diesel unless I lived in California, where I belie

    D

    1. Re:Sadly, no. by patchmaster · · Score: 1

      Both the Toyota and the Honda use NiMH batteries, not lead acid. They're about as neutral on the environment as you can get.

    2. Re:Sadly, no. by macosxaddict · · Score: 1

      Standard car batteries are lead acid, but the batteries in hybrid cars are typically (IIRC) NiMH, not lead acid.

  298. Toyota Rav4 EV ? by mrv · · Score: 1

    Since you say that you're in California, did you even check out the Toyota Rav4 EV that's available for purchase/lease to ordinary people (not just the fleet purchasers)? Only available in California so far.

    http://rav4ev.toyota.com/consumer/rav4ev_0_home/ ra v_home.htm

    Toyota claims that the top speed is 78mph, and a 125mile range.

    (I'll admit that it's a lot pricier (~$30k after CA incentives) than the $20k hybrids (Toyota Prius, Honda Insight and Civic)!)

    A good review of the Toyota Rav4 EV is at:
    http://www.thecarplace.com/agravev.htm

    --
    -mrv
  299. 2 Years in a Prius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever since baby forced the sale of the racing CRX, in 2000, we've been in a Toyota Prius.
    It's roomy enough for two adults and two kids in car seats, has enough luggage space for a week long trip, and repels various snack fluids very well. It works well for us up here in the mountains where I get 52 MPG in the summer and 46 in the winter.

    My overall view is that it's the cleanest of the hybrids (SULEV instead of ULEV like the Hondas), and has the longest history, being introduced in Japan in 97. There are almost 100,000 of them on the road now.

    Ours has been very reliable so far (20 months, 15,000 miles). My only complaint is that the LCD screen does not do enough. There are SO many possibilites for monitoring the hybrid system and displaying the info for the passenger.

    When we purchased it, there was a $2,000 tax rebate from the CA government, and free maintinance for three years.

    Look for the Toyota Estima next year, the new all wheel drive hybrid currently in use in Japan. It's way cool for a mini-van!

    Hope this helps!

    -geek

  300. Car Sharing: Don't Buy Anything by mcguire · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Have you considered car sharing? It's fairly popular in Europe; in the US, it's small but growing fast. I work for Zipcar, an east coast car sharing (only, we say 'hourly car rental') company. Your version in SF is City Car Share.

    While I can't speak for City Car Share, here at Zipcar we park cars in reserved spaces all around the metro area -- right now we're in Boston, DC, and NYC; you reserve online by the hour, and enter/exit the cars with an access card. When you're done, you park the car back in it's home (generally 5 mins. from your home), and the car sends back your milage for us to bill you. It's very painless, and a great alterative to car ownership, especially in cities where that ownership can run into the tens of thousands per year.

  301. Air Powered Alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about an air powered car?

  302. Fighter Jet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It used jet fuel! It goes fast! It has guns! It doesn't contribute to congestion on the highways! If you get VOTL aircraft you have a viable commute.

    Yes sir! Harrier Jump jets are the only way to go.

  303. Re:If I were in your shoes....(diesel, pollution) by otis+wildflower · · Score: 2, Informative

    Are there catalysts to take care of that?
    Yep
    Will they work with US diesel, which is higher in sulfur than what Europeans buy?
    Nope :/

    How do direct-injection diesels get the relatively low-soot performance that they do?

    IIRC it is via very high (over 10kPSI) injection pressure, which atomizes the fuel more finely than prechambered diesels, leading to more combustion efficiency (fuel efficiency and reduced particulates)..

    Check this google cache link (I can't get to tdiclub):
    Fuel FAQ

  304. Diesel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Diesel is a much more efficient technology than
    electric if you look at the big picture - That
    "clean" electricity has to come from somewhere.
    (Coal, Natural Gas, nuke, etc...) There is only so
    much "clean" electricity availabe at the moment,
    and using it up just means greater demand and
    more coal plants.

    Diesel VW beetles and golfs (new ones) with
    the turbo are getting 65 miles per gallon, better
    than a lot of these "hybrids".

  305. I'm sure someone else has already posted this, but by itallushrt · · Score: 1

    ...be sure to check out www.greasecar.com . A friend of mine turned me onto this about a year ago. He was working at the time to gather parts in order to turn a Mecedes Benz G Wagon , http://www.mercedes-benz.com/e/cars/g-class/defaul t.htm , into a grease contraption. To date he still hasn't built it.

  306. TZERO SPORTS ELECTRIC CAR! by dizbero · · Score: 1

    This car is an impressive alternative: http://www.acpropulsion.com/tzero_pages/tzero_home .htm As soon as its in production I'm gonna get one! Note to self: start playing lottery...

  307. hydrogen fuel-cells by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hear that hydrogen fuel cell cars are coming along pretty well. A lot of companies are making them, so they might become "the" alternative fuel vehicle. Unfortunately, I'm not sure that any are out quite yet.

  308. EV Pickup Truck by SaschaD · · Score: 1

    I just purchased a used Chevy S-10 EV. It was actually an old gas guzzla' converted over to electric by the Cleveland Illuminating Co. a couple of years ago. I'm fixing a few issues, like attempting to revive its old battery bank and avoid spending the extra $2k for a new set. But I'm told that with the components that I have in the truck and the battery bank I should be able to get 50-100 miles per charge. Even on the low end of that range, it's more than enough to get me back an forth to work here in MA. I'm expecting that I'll be dealing with the low end of the range during the winter when the battery bank loses it's charge capacity due to the cold. Anyhow, if this does work out I'm planning to sell my Saturn SL which gets a wee 39-40mpg on my trips to work (why buy a Prius for $7k more for only a few more miles per gallon???). If you're interested in converting your own car or truck, I've gotten a lot of valuable advice from a very friendly and informative guy named 'Bob' at EV America. He was actually the one who gave me the tip on where to buy this used EV. Their website is: http://www.ev-america.com/

  309. green auto links by mrv · · Score: 1

    These links are for anyone looking for a new car. Please try to get one with the highest MPG (or lowest l/km), lowest emissions, or most recycled, that you can find that still suits your needs.

    EPA Green Vehicle Guide
    Compares emissions and fuel economy of vehicles in same class
    http://www.epa.gov/greenvehicles/

    2002 Greenest vehicles:
    http://www.greenercars.org/12green.html

    2002 "Meanest" vehicles for the environment:
    http://www.greenercars.org/12mean.ht ml

    Fuel Economy.Gov
    US DOE/EPA site allows you to compare car models
    http://www.fueleconomy.gov

    Auto$mart program (Canada)
    EnerGuide (fuel efficiency ratings), driving tips
    http://oee.nrcan.gc.ca/autosmart/

    2002 Best MPG Cars (USA)
    http://carpoint.msn.com/browse/win_4018922.asp

    Automotive Market Environmental Sensitivity Awards
    Awards for autos with the best balance of vehicle emissions, fuel efficiency and recycled material content in a vehicle utility class. Lists for the various classes of vehicles for several years.
    http://www.amesaward.com/

    --
    -mrv
  310. New car for me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want my new vehicle to be an alternative fuel vehicle . It will be powered by a mix of Hydrazine and Hydrogen Peroxide. It will go 14,000Mph and gets about 500 feet to a gallon.

    Too bad it is not street legal :(

    Anyone guess what it is?

  311. Problem for USA... No automatic diesels by wackybrit · · Score: 0, Troll

    The Americans are smart and like driving cars with automatic transmission, whereas their European counterparts like wrestling with sticks and drive like retards.

    There are no popular automatic diesel cars, and in fact, I've never even heard of an automatic diesel car. This may be why they are extremely unpopular in the US. If they made an automatic diesel that was cost effective, I'd get one.

    1. Re:Problem for USA... No automatic diesels by Mydron · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nice troll FUDster:

      All of VW's TDI-able models in North America (Golf & Jetta) come with an optional, but very responsive automatic transmission. Surprisingly VW has gotten the transmissions to the point were there is very little power/efficiency loss over the manual.

      VW Jetta

    2. Re:Problem for USA... No automatic diesels by Koyaanisqatsi · · Score: 1

      Go for a tiptronic transmission maybe. Pure automatic just means you're out of the loop and don't have control over engine RPM. Don't get me wrong, for inner-city its ok to drive automatic, but on the road I preffer manual.

    3. Re:Problem for USA... No automatic diesels by landrumdh · · Score: 1

      There is no Tiptronic tranny for the TDI in the US.

    4. Re:Problem for USA... No automatic diesels by ksheff · · Score: 2, Informative

      My dad had a 1984 Oldsmobile Ciera that had a diesel V6. It got great mileage, had an automatic transmission, and lasted for over 250K miles. Oldsmobile offered a few other diesel models too, such as the Cutlass.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    5. Re:Problem for USA... No automatic diesels by wackybrit · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, perhaps I shouldn't apply European problems to the USA.

      So, I state it more accurately: There is no TDI Auto in the UK. This is because Brits are stupid (I'm one, btw) and don't like automatic vehicles.. hence no market demand = no supply.

    6. Re:Problem for USA... No automatic diesels by Dwarfgoat · · Score: 1

      Keep Osama funded?

      WTF, over? My '01 Nissan X-Terra gets the same mileage as my '99 Honda Prelude! (Of course, that is most likely due to the way I drive the Prelude).

      --
      That? That was a pigeon.
    7. Re:Problem for USA... No automatic diesels by ksheff · · Score: 1

      Whether we like it or not, dependence on MidEast oil is helping our adversaries. Either directly via purchases from Iraq or indirectly via Saudi oil men who help fund al Qaeda. SUVs are one reason for the big jump in our oil consumption (someone has done a study that showed that about 1/2 our gasoline is used by SUVs & pickups even though they probably only make up about 1/4 of the vehicles) and why we continue to be dependent on unstable nations. We need more efficient vehicles and more domestic petroleum exploration.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  312. How is the AC? by megalomang · · Score: 1

    Living in the south (Texas), AC isn't even an option any more. Toyota/Lexus has the best/coldest/mostpowerful ACs, hands down. Nissan/Infinity ACs are close, but Honda/Acura ACs tend to be poor.

    So, does the Prius have a "Toyota AC"? What effect does the AC have on the mileage?

    I note that when I drive my (ahem...cough cough4runnercough cough) vehicle I typically get 21mpg with AC off. With AC on, I get about 20mpg.

  313. Electric = bad alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are truly interested in protecting the environment, stay away from EVs. The greatest proportion of our electric power comes from coal, which is the worst-polluting form of energy production we have. CNG is the way to go.

    1. Re:Electric = bad alternative by SaschaD · · Score: 1

      If you're fortunate to live in state where you can choose the producer of your electricity this does not have to be the case. For instance, in Massachusetts you can choose from one of a handful of companies that produce energy from renewable resources (e.g. wind, solar, bio, hydro).

      So in these cases, it's up to the consumer if they want to "Go Coal".

  314. Re:Jetta TDI has better mileage by ray-auch · · Score: 1

    They also move up/down as well as back - provided you get the higher spec models. For tall drivers this is absolutely essential. Also the steering wheel should have height/reach adjust to get it away from your knees.

    I'm (only!) 6'2, but I have quite reasonable clearance above-head and knees-steering wheel in our (2001) golf. I normally drive it with seat right down and right back, but I can cope (ie. its not as comfortable but my legs/head are not actually jammed against stuff) with it slightly raised and slightly forward, if we need to get stuff in the back.

  315. Lunar Solar by phriedom · · Score: 1

    Solar Panels on the Moon? I missed that article. Off the top of my head, the problem I see is that the moon would only be in line of sight to a ground based receiving station for half of each day, and any particular point on the moon would only be in sunlight for about 14 of every 28 days. How do they overcome those problems?

    --
    Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
    1. Re:Lunar Solar by nathanm · · Score: 2

      I'm pretty sure I first saw the reference on /. but a search didn't help. Anyway, here's the source article on ABC News.

    2. Re:Lunar Solar by phriedom · · Score: 1

      So the answers are:
      1. build two sets of solar power collectors on nearly opposite sides on the moon so that one is in the light nearly all the time. and
      2. Build a network of satellites to redirect the beam around to the earth surface receiver.

      That sounds like it makes the project about 3 times larger than just "build a solar array on the moon and beam it back to the earth" sounded. Criswell call this a "limitless supply" and "clean energy that's low in cost so developing nations can afford it." But in fact, it is not limitless, and costs about $200 Billion US to get to break-even, plus the ongoing cost of maintainance and the cost of interest on $200 billion. It is certainly an entertaining idea, but gosh the moon is so very far away. I can't help but think we could do more with that $200 Billion right here on earth. Generating the power close to where it is used whenever possible seems like good practice.

      --
      Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
    3. Re:Lunar Solar by hping · · Score: 1

      Better to make a set of satellites with a solar power collectors which beam the power from off space directly by UHF to a grid-convertor earthside. Build each satellite in a lower-earth orbit and then place in a geosynchronized orbit by using small plasma rockets.

      Problem will be the size of the collectors, because the will have to be able to carry the all power Earth will need, and we do not want to destroy the environment by derpriving it from the sun.

      There must be done some maths if it is feasable.

    4. Re:Lunar Solar by phriedom · · Score: 2

      Hey that could be a partial solution to the "global warming" thing. Make a very, very, very large geosynchronous orbital solar collector (perhaps overwhelmingly large?) and its "shadow" would reduce the heat that reaches the earch by a very,very,very small amount. The "shadow" which is really only a slight localised reduction in intensity, would move west to east each day and north to south and back during the year, so it would be spread over an oval shape centered on the equator.

      I don't think anyone has ruled out the theory that global warming is the result of increased solar intensity, and if it is true, than this would be direct treatment of the root cause.

      --
      Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
  316. An alternative fuel built into your body by failrate · · Score: 1

    If you're willing to put in a little work and some welding, you could make a pedal car out of two bicycles that would have >=25 mph and an unlimited range.

    --
    Voodoo Girl is the bomb!
  317. Re:a couplet of ideas: My cycling experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First of all, HOW IN THE WORLD can you cycle when it's below freezing out??? I never had good experiences cycling when the temperature dropped below 35 F or so - to avoid freezing, I had to wear very bulky clothing which hampered my movement (I was in highschool, couldn't afford expensive stuff, still can't). I also lived in a neighborhood with busy streets and unplowed/icy sidewalks.

    Secondly, I'm not so sure about biking if you actually live IN a small city, as I do now (college student). I've already gotten my bike stolen this summer when it was locked up the only place I could find outside. I had to buy a new one from Walmart, because that's all I can afford right now. To top it all off, I STILL can't get a job, because the only places I've found that I'm qualified for are out in the suburbs, >10 miles away. Why do I have to be so poor and cars so expensive!!!!

  318. TDI Turbo Direct Inject Diesel by MrBlic · · Score: 1

    I love my TDI Volkswagen Jetta. You can also get the engine in a Beetle, Golf, etc. It doesn't have the greatest emmisions ratings, but it does get 45 - 50 MPG (american), and it is fun to drive. It has a lot of torque, so you feel like you are on the end of a really big thick rubber band when you accelerate.

    Whatever hybrid you buy today, not many service shops are going to be able to maintain it for you, and it is going to be obsolete in the very near future. This equals a huge extra cost.

    The Turbo Direct Inject (TDI) Diesel is familliar to mechanics, and the best part is that you can burn BioDiesel if you can find it. BioDiesel is fuel that is made from vegetable oil. When Rudolph Diesel designed the Diesel engine, he was a visionary who wanted it to run off vegetable oil, and 'save the world.' The oil companies turned it into a good engine for their low-grade petrolium waste.

    The drawbacks to BioDiesel is that it is a little less powerful, you'll notice abut %20 less horsepower. It gets waxy quickly in cold weather, and it can 'harden' the plastic / rubber fuel lines in the car, so that you have to replace some of the fuel lines every few years. (reference: cars.com in the 'fringe' part of the Car Talk website)

    -Jim

    --
    Celebrate Excellence!
  319. VW 1-litre car by Sepultura · · Score: 1

    Volkswagen is a leader in the fuel-efficiency field. Especially in Europe. They recently designed the world's first 1-litre car (not for sale, yet...). You can find info at http://www.vwvortex.com/news/04_02/04_17/index.sht ml

    A 1-litre car is a car that can go 100km on 1L of fuel. That's 235+ mpg, folks! They actually got a bit better than the goal of 1L on a recent test run.

  320. What a bunch of fucking pussies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Oh, I get good gas mileage!" "Oh, I'm helping the enviroment!" You asshats aren't going to pull in any chicks with your 65mpg Tonka truck. Get yourself a '67 Mustang GT with a 289 hi-po and discover that you can have fun driving without needing to feel smug.

  321. Ford Escape by dsfox · · Score: 2

    Next year Ford will come out with a Hybrid Escape, which is a medium sized SUV. That link doesn't
    work in my browser, but maybe it will in yours.

  322. Possibly worth nothing by Dirtside · · Score: 2

    Slightly offtopic, but I recently bought a 2002 Honda Accord EX 4-cylinder sedan (with leather, etc.). The fuel efficiency isn't anything near a hybrid or EV (28 mpg or so), but I was surprised when I opened the hood and saw that it's a SULEV. Strict emissions standards are a good thing.

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  323. lease a car? stupid fucker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You leased a car? You must like throwing money away, or have be so dumbfucking stupid that you let the salesman talk you into a lease. Fuck you stupid idiots!!!!!!11111

  324. ahh yes, but this one smokes a ferrari.. by paroxysm · · Score: 1

    I was working at a large NPO in san jose, and got to see this first hand at moffett field.. it was rather impressive.. http://www.acpropulsion.com/tzero_pages/tzero_home .htm

  325. Rav 4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget the Toyota Rav 4. At a recent car show, the Toyota folks had an all-electric Rav 4 that is 'becoming available for the consumer market' instead of just for fleets.

    Range ~120 miles / charge. 4-8 hours to recharge. Top speed a little over 80 mph.

  326. Prius != Echo (and no longer subsidized) by haahr · · Score: 1

    The Prius and the Echo are very different cars, though the styling is similar at first glance. Before we bought our Prius, we test drove both and, in comparison, the Echo felt like an underpowered tin can. Not that the Prius is high performance at all; it's just more so than the Echo.

    From what I've heard, the Prius is no longer subsidized to any great degree by Toyota. For the first couple of model years (the three it was out in Japan before the release in the U.S.), it was $10K more to make than the US selling price, but manufacturing competency and economies of scale have kicked in. Supposedly, they're profitable for Toyota now. (But do you trust what a car dealer says?)

    You're probably right that when the batteries eventually wear out, it'll be cheaper to junk the car than replace them, but resale value of a ten-year old car is down in the noise on a new car purchase. As is the $1000-1500 saved over the life of the car on fuel costs.

    -- Another satisfied Prius owner

  327. Insight hands down by Squalish · · Score: 1

    900 posts into this(What is it that makes this so popular?) I doubt this will be read, but my 2 cents:
    Get the insight w/ CVT. Better gas mileage and a completely computer-controlled transmission. This could make as much difference as automatic over manual. Also, and more importantly, looks. The closest thing the prius resembles is someone that needs a nosejob. It is one of the ugliest cars I have seen in a while. It's too short, snubby, and other than being a hybrid, it adds no features we havn't seen on a million other cars. The insight actually looks GOOD, better than most sedans and a lot of sports cars IMO. Another factor: A 2 seater trying to cut down on size is inherently roomier than a 4-seater trying to cut down on size. Better gas mileage, tons better looks, CVT, more room, and(in comparison to your 50 mile electric) u get 600 miles off of 20$(10 gallons) of gas. Much as I would like to reccomend a true alternative fuel car, the infrastructure is just not ready, even if the tech may be.

    --
    People in Soviet Russia, however, appear to be afflicted with amusing juxtapositions of the aforementioned situation
  328. why not use an organic engine? by ronsow · · Score: 1

    I still say the perfect hybrid is human/recumbent... for you
    or you and your wife.

  329. /. covered the Tzero a while ago by rwa2 · · Score: 2

    Slashdot mentioned the Tzero a while ago. I'm certainly waiting until I can save up the ~$70K to afford one (after they come to market, of course... :P )

  330. Toyota RAV4 EV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In California, you can now lease or buy the Toyota RAV4 EV. I've been leasing one for a little over a year and love it. It has a range of about 100 miles, depending on your speed. It's top end is around 75. It's not quite as zippy as an EV1 (my friends have leased several ), but it's all the fun of an SUV and none of the guilt. You'll qualify for all the rebates and you can get Clean Fuel stickers for the HOV lanes.

  331. Why ask slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why ask slashdot about alternative fuel cars? A more apropos question might be, what percentage of the slashdot readership is actually old enough to DRIVE a car?

  332. Don't forget the tax rebates!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For those US taxpayers with Hybrids be sure to check out the IRS $2k rebate! IRS should have this up & available for 2002 tax year, with applicability to previous years of ownership (may require re-filing for past years, not sure there). I know this applies to hybrids but check if you've got an EV also!

    At $2k that's better than the anklebiter deduction. Forget having a kid, get a hybrid! Besides, it's still cheaper annually than a yard monster, even with out the rebate/deduction =-).

    BTW, never drive your EV into a small body of water, unless its distilled water. If you do land it in the water, the fire department ain't coming in after you!

  333. Pure Electric by marshac · · Score: 1

    According to everything I have read, charging an electric vehicle produces MORE pollution, CO2, NOx, and SOx than simply using gasoline. The reason? Most of the US relies on coal fired plants.

    It *seems* like you're saving the planet by going totally electric, but the simple fact of the matter is: you're not.

    Low temp PEM fuel cells are probably the "next" thing in cars. Research is finding out that carbon nanotubes "soak up" hydrogen like a sponge, and from the last report I read, a "tank" (they didn't define the size) of hydrogen soaked nanotubes would allow a fuel cell powered car to drive for about 1500 miles w/o a fill-up. Sounds pretty good to me.

    1. Re:Pure Electric by SaschaD · · Score: 1

      Like I said in another thread, if you're in a state where you're allowed to choose your "electricity manufacturer" you usually have a couple of options for renewable energy producers (e.g. wind, bio, solar, hydro, etc). If you live in one of these states, it's up to you to choose the right provider. Funny thing is - not many people know this... for some reason the local, old electric utility doesn't advertise to the public much that they have a choice.

  334. The other Honda hybrid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My next new car will be the 2003 Honda Civic Hybrid. Yes, it only gets 51 MPG as opposed to the 60 MPG the Insight gets, but then it looks and drives like a normal car, and seats 5. Furthmore, it will go 660 miles before refueling -- try doing THAT in an all-electric car!

  335. since you're in California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could take a look at the Rav4 EV, as well. We got to play with one a bit at a fair in Santa Monica last year, and they're really pretty impressive, and a sight bigger than the Prius as well.

  336. American Excess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a shame you americans don't live in europe. we make SMALL cars with SMALL engines that use SMALL amounts if fuel because cars don't need to be BIG. To cite just a few - Peugeot 106, VW lupo/Seat arosa, Renault twingo, MCC smart, etc etc. Most come with 1 litre, 3 cylinder petrol engines or smaller (the smart has a 600cc turbocharged engine) and consume miniscule amounts of fuel. When it comes to fuel efficiency and emissions (and car ergonomics!), the US has a lot to learn from the Europeans (check out the german governments D4 emissions standards.) Most of these HEV and electric vehicles do not sell in Europe because a. they're expensive .b. they consume more fuel than the small cars already available - yes, you'll spend more money on electricity (from an oil fired power plant) than on fuel .c. they're pig ugly. So, not referring to any particular posts here, some people need to do their research a lot better before posting.

    1. Re:American Excess by eberry · · Score: 1
      Some people need to do their research a lot better before posting.
      I agree, starting with you.
      b. they consume more fuel than the small cars already available - yes, you'll spend more money on electricity (from an oil fired power plant) than on fuel
      You don't charge the battery. Hybrid cars recharge via regenerative braking. And they are still big enough to put my groceries in.
      --
      Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. Lois, this isn't my Batman glass. - Peter
  337. Ethenol by Jedi+Binglebop · · Score: 1

    Ethenol really is a safe and easy bio friendly fuel. You can convert a regular car engine to ethenol simply be removing any rubber hosing that comes in contact with the fuel. The exhaust of ethenol (from memory) is water and a little bit of carbon dioxide, which not as harmful as carbon monoxide.

    I'm regularly stumped as to why persuers of bio friendly fuels aren't chasing this safe and easy
    (and cheap to make) fuel source. It has an added benifit that the left over waste from producing sugar to make the ethenol can be used as organic mulch.

    -JB

    --

    "I love deadlines. I love the "whooshing" sound they make as they pass by." - Douglas Adams.

    1. Re:Ethenol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason is that producing ethanol uses more energy than you make from the product.

      For example if a factory "makes" gasoline and I put in 100 gals and I get back 90 gals of gas. what good does that do us? You wasted 10 gals making the same 100 gals I started with?

      Why dont the ethanol plants run on ethanol instead of fossil fuels? If they were net energy positive they could burn their own ethanol. If they cant make ethanol plant process net energy positive they need to shut them down. Ethanol production is just reprocessed fossil fuels. If fossil fuel prices increase significantly this will directly impact ethanol costs because it uses so much to produce ethanol.

      We need to find a better solution.

  338. Re:making up for all the environmental wackos? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right, as long as I'm willing to pay for the gas, who the hell cares what I do? I'd buy an electric car if they had any such thing that had power and performance. My truck pulls 15000 trailers, try doing that with an electric power source in a pickup truck. One of my cars makes over 1000hp and goes 0-60 in less than 3 seconds. The trade off? Poor gas mileage. You have to pay if you want power, simple as that. I'm willing to pay.

  339. More diesels with cleaner diesel fuel by RayChuang · · Score: 2

    I think the biggest resaon why we don't see that many diesel cars in the USA is the fact the diesel fuel sold in the USA has WAY too much sulfur compounds in the fuel, which is highly-corrosive to the fuel-delivery and exhaust control systems found on European diesel cars.

    With the EPA mandate to reduce sulfur compounds to under 80 parts per million in diesel fuel by 2005, this may open the way for highly-efficient diesel cars that will offer almost the same performance as gasoline-fuelled engines but at 35-45% better fuel efficiency. And with little or no sulfur compounds to deal with, we can use common-rail direct-injection systems for extremely precise fuel delivery and modern particulate traps and catalytic converters that will ensure that diesel cars meet the ULEV emissions standard.

    Already, a demonstration of how effective a diesel engine can get is the amazing Duramax engine found on current-model GM pickup trucks. The Duramax engine allows a pickup truck to pull 8,000 pound trailers at 18 miles per US gallon fuel efficiency, compared to 9 mpg for the equivalent gasoline engine!

    --
    Raymond in Mountain View, CA
  340. Except you can't buy them in some states by RayChuang · · Score: 2

    Coolfish,

    Only one problem--the Jetta TDI is not sold in California and a number of Northeastern states because the exhaust emissions from the engine don't meet current emission standards.

    To meet emission standards will require a new low-sulfur diesel fuel--something we won't get until 2005. :-(

    --
    Raymond in Mountain View, CA
    1. Re:Except you can't buy them in some states by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your information is out of date. You can get TDIs in all 50 states now.

      Many Arco stations in CA are starting to get the Ultra Low Sulpher Diesel NOW, 4 years ahead of schedule!

    2. Re:Except you can't buy them in some states by RayChuang · · Score: 2

      Actually, CARB has for some years required that diesel fuel must have no more than 80 parts per million of sulfur compounds, which is the strictest standard in the world. The so-called clean diesel fuels sold in Europe and Japan have about 300-400 parts per million; Diesel #2 fuel sold in the USA has as much as 2,000 parts per million of sulfur compounds!

      When the whole USA switches to low-sulfur diesel fuel, expect a major rise in the sales of modern diesel-powered cars because now we can apply common-rail direct-injection systems (which lowers fuel consumption even further because of more precise fuel delivery) and can use modern particulate traps and catalytic converters (since they won't be corroded by what amounts to sulfuric acid fumes) to reduce emissions to ULEV levels.

      --
      Raymond in Mountain View, CA
  341. Re:Jetta TDI has better mileage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    6'4" here and fit into my Passat just fine.

  342. New Civic Sedan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get the new Civic sedan. I uses the hybrid like the Insite.. 85hp gas engine with a 25 hp electric assist.... or better yet, what about that Honda DN-X (also called the dual note... 300 hp v6 gas motor combined with a 100 hp electric assist)

  343. wake up and smell the oil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's sad to read /. and see how sad we here in the U.S. are buying the crap (quite literally) that the oil companies and pulling out of the ground.

    While hybrids may be better than nothing, they are more of a feel-good buy than anything else, kind of like how you feel like an environmentalist when you toss your soda can in the recycle bin, even if you then go on to burn large amounts of fossil fuels. If car companies strapped on a few more batteries and let you actually plug the hybrids in, they'd do so much more for the environment. But, like Microsoft, they tout the not being able to plug in and recharge as a feature, not a bug.

    On those people who seem to think that all energy conversion is the same, I've got some news for you:

    1) Even if all energy came from fossil fuels, a electric motor is going to be more efficient than an internal combustion engine in city or heavy traffic driving, simply because the motor does not run when you're idling.

    2) As others have pointed out, it's much more efficient to generate electricity from fossil fuels in a large power plant (for one reason among many, you can run the generators at a constant rpm rate where they are the most efficient).

    3) In some parts of the world, even in parts of the oil-hungry U.S., energy comes from other sources, and alternative energy is only going to become more prevalent. For example, here in Seattle, 95% of our electricity comes from hydroelectric power. Yes, there can be environmental issues with fish and water flow, but they pale in comparison to the pollution from fossil fuels.

    4) Hydrogen fuel cells are a great concept, particularly if you get the hydrogen cleanly, such as through the electrolysis of water. However, it's much cheaper to get the hydrogen from traditional fossil fuels, so that's what will likely happen, so unfortunately hydrogen fuel cells are not the cure-all solution some oil-company-backed interests would like us to believe they are, although they are still better than traditional fossil fuel usage, for reasons 1&2 above.

    Another point to consider is that the average American drives less than 40 miles a day, so pure electric vehicles are particularly reasonable for those who live in a city and can plug in their cars to charge them at night. Electric conversions can be done for a few thousand dollars, see www.cloudelectric.com for details (I am not affiliated with them, but they have some good info on their site).

  344. HYBRID-Electric DRIVE by seney · · Score: 1
    Hybrid-Electric Drive


    The drivesystem in a conventional car consists of an internal-combustion engine mechanically coupled to the drive wheels through the transmission, driveshaft, and so on. This is an ingenious but complex and inherently inefficient way of converting fuel into traction at the wheels. A much better way is to have the engine (or other power source) generate electricity from the fuel, which then powers motors that turn the wheels. Such a "hybrid-electric" drivesystem offers several advantages over conventional systems.

    Most importantly, the engine needs to handle only the maximum continuous load, not the peak load. Unlike the mechanical torque generated by a conventional system, the hybrid's electricity can be stored temporarily in a small battery or other similar device until it's needed for extra acceleration. Result: the engine can shrink to a fraction of the current normal size, reducing weight, cost, and fuel consumption; and it can always run at or very near its "sweet spot," typically doubling drivesystem efficiency. It can even turn off automatically whenever it's not needed.

    Additionally, the electric motors of a hybrid vehicle can recover part of the braking energy that would otherwise be lost as heat in the brakes. They become generators, slowing the vehicle by using its kinetic energy to make electricity that is stored until needed. Some experimental vehicles have demonstrated up to 70-percent peak energy recovery, but recovery of about 50 percent is seen by many experts as a more realistic goal.

    And finally, hybrid-electric drive opens the door to other exciting new electrical power sources, such as fuel cells.

    The exact workings of hybrid drivesystems vary. There are two basic configurations: parallel and series. For more details on these, see the Hybrid Vehicle Propulsion Program On-Line Resource Center (http://hevdev.nrel.gov).

    Many auto manufacturers are now developing or selling hybrid-electric cars, which is a huge leap forward in its own right. However, thanks to the principle of mass decompounding, hybrid-electric drive works better and costs less if you reduce the vehicle's weight and drag first.

    Don't confuse hybrid-electric vehicles with battery-electric vehicles . Hybrids generate their own electricity onboard, so they don't have to haul around hundreds of extra pounds of storage batteries, nor do they suffer from the short driving ranges and long recharging times of battery cars.

    credit www.rmi.org for this text.

  345. Hempcar by jabber · · Score: 1

    The Hempcar project had concluded last fall. I'm friends with the crew, who are based near Hampton Roads Va, and had a chance to spend some time at the onset of their trip up the coast in the early Summer of 2001.

    The great PR success of the Hempcar project has inspired a similar effort in Japan. The only link I could find on short notice is here.

    --

    -- What you do today will cost you a day of your life.
  346. Cost savings is a bogus argument by tlianza · · Score: 1

    45 miles per day = roughly 11,250 miles per year.
    At $1.30 per gallon (estimated) that means:

    - A normal (non hybrid) sedan that gets 25 mpg will cost $585 a year in gas.
    - The hybrid (50 mpg) will cost $265 a year in gas

    Net savings: about $320 per year

    Now, factor in how much a Prius (@ $20K) costs versus a regular compact sedan like a Corolla (@$14K - plus actually gets more like 30MPG) and it would seem that with a $6K difference in price, you'll have to drive the car for about 18 years before you make up that money.

    1. Re:Cost savings is a bogus argument by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have any of the people knocking the cost bothered to think that maybe, just maybe, people are willing to spend extra money on something they want, for whatever reason?

  347. Bottom Line by HeLLaLaMe · · Score: 1

    The discussion has mainly focused on alternative car fuels. Sure technology in this area has a way to go, but the bottom line is CO2 production must be reduced. (esp. by you bloody americans) Farmlands of the future will have to support food production not car fuels, so that leaves the obvious choice of electric cars. Granted electricity has to come from somewhere, probally nuclear for a while (ie No Co2) until technology in alternative energy production is better. Anyway we are running low on everything and you all know it. Catch the bus!

    1. Re:Bottom Line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly the fact that CLIT has been unable to respond to these faggot hippies shows that ACs will have to lead the way in trolling.

      Troll Tuesday has been a failure. Que cera, que cera.

    2. Re:Bottom Line by HeLLaLaMe · · Score: 1

      Faggot-Hippie?? Well done, I see we're stereotypers here. What are you? mid-westerner? eminem listener? Actually I'm not a faggot or hippie although there is nothing wrong with either. I just worry about my kids future you red neck hick bastard.

  348. Re:Jetta TDI has better mileage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, but then you'll be driving a nasty diesel engine that belches 50 times as many carcinogens as gasoline.

  349. Compressed Air Powered Car by renota · · Score: 1

    How about a car that runs on compressed air?
    http://www.zeropollution.com/zeropollution/a bout_u s.html

  350. Wait a little for *fast* hybrids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many car manufacturers are looking at coupling LEV (low-emissions vehicle)-class V6es with electric motors. You get V8-class performance out of an engine combination that can easily exceed 30MPG in light-footed street driving... but it will still press you into your seat when you mash the throttle.

    Even if you're not into spirited driving, that extra torque makes the car more driveable around town. It also makes it easier to accelerate away from potential accidents and pass drunken weavers on the freeway.

  351. Alternative fuel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, the VW TDIs are alternative, but if you're driving an EV now, it's not likely a smoky, chokey diesel will be your cup of tea.

    Ford makes natural-gas powered vehicles (mainly its Crown Victoria). THey're mainly for fleets, but I'm sure you could get one.

    The Toyota Prius is a nice little practical car. I've driven them, and if it weren't for the little display on the dash, you can't tell it apart from any other little econobox.

    I wouldn't recommend the Insight. It makes too many sacrifices for the sake of gas mileage.

    Ford is coming out with an Escape SUV hybrid, and most automakers are working on hybrid powertrains for their full-size trucks and SUVs.

    You could also get a Corvette. No, I'm not joking as much as you think. An easy right foot can get you over 30 MPG in this car at highway speeds (as long as you don't get the hi-po rear axle). That's more than respectable for a V8 that hasn't really changed a whole lot in the past 40 years or so.

  352. Prius by w00dy_aus · · Score: 1

    Howdy, Just thought I would let you know that we now have 4 of these Hybrid Electric Prius cars at work. At first I was a sceptic of its fuel econemy vs speed and comfort. All of which I can say I was wrong about, the car is most comfortable to drive, fuel econemy is fantastic and speed/power wise its just as nice as an equal sized petrol (or gas for you yanks) car. Go for it. w00dy

  353. I prefer my 10 second street sleeper malibu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pictures posted on net somewhere, but I can't afford to have them slashdotted right now. 9 seconds on the bottle.

    Buy yourself big ol' Suburban with the 8.1 liter engine. You won't have to worry about getting killed in an accident, plenty of room, great in snow/driving over death trap cars in traffic/great attitude changer in pedestrians/etc. You won't even hear the pedestrians bouncing off the bumber/panels.

    While you are at it, rip the cats out, and reprogram the computer. You'll get better gas mileage, and don't worry about the environment. There is nothing that your big ol' 'burban will do to the environment that nature doesn't do to itself.

  354. Unless it's a web-site... by DaveWood · · Score: 2

    ;-P

  355. Civic Hybrid! by alexburke · · Score: 2

    It seems like the perfect fit. As you already own an Accord, the Civic Hybrid will have the Honda quality, reliability, and fit-and-finish you already know and appreciate, and is very easy on the environment. Plus, it's much more useful than maximum-100-miles-between-8-hour-charges pure-electric vehicles.

  356. Do the math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    kW for kW, the internal combustion engine is still more effecient than an electric. Unless you spend hours sitting in traffic going no where.
    When you add the generation efficiency, transmission efficiency, storage efficiency, and the efficiency of the electric motor, you end up loosing more energy than you would thru an internal combustion engine. Personally, I think your best bet to save the planet is going with a hybrid electric instead of a pure electric.

    1. Re:Do the math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the reverse is true. Electric motors are approximately three times as efficient as an internal combustion engine, even accounting for the storage loss. The generation and transmission loss for electricity from the power plant to your house is much less than the energy loss from transporting all the gasoline to the gas stations, so I'm not even going to compare those below. A typical internal combustion engine gets around 25% efficiency, while the electric enginers get anywhere from 75%-90% efficiency. Hybrids typically get around 50% or less, which is still better than nothing. In traffic, the difference is even more pronounced.

  357. You can get a Ford Ranger EV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ford Ranger for lease

  358. Re:Ethanol and CO vs. CO2 by mikec · · Score: 2

    CO2 is a greenhouse gas.

  359. Another Bandwagon... by Lunis+Torrvaldez · · Score: 1

    Have you poor fools already forgotten about the solution to all our problems??? The Smegway!!!

  360. yeah right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh please, not another one of those goddamned earth-loving hippies! I bet you're also one of those anti-god pledge mutationists that are all of the sudden in vogue! Get a clue! By popular vote, (and The President Of The United States Of America), we don't give a shit about earth! We've said, like, down with earth! You're either with us with our opinion, or you're against us! We hate mother earth - 'cause we're a nation under God, duh! Haven't you realized? In this post-9-11 world, you're either a christian white male who hates the ozone layer or else. We're going to stuff our monotheism up your ass! Don't even think about recycling that can, Stan! Wanting to save the earth is surely political correctness gone nutty, and if you think your life should be saved for disagreeing, you godless communist, well you're surely nuts. In conclusion, miguel de icaza loves monopolist MS's .net while you loves to suk big hik dik, hyuk hyuuk.

  361. Re:Fuel per acre by Hoser+McMoose · · Score: 1

    Just a little addition to the above. An awful lot of corn grown these days is BT corn (genetically engineered corn with an organic pesticide gene added). I don't have any exact numbers, but I'm fairly certain that it's somewhere in the 50% range. This further reduces the amount of pesticide beyond the techniques mentioned above.

    Farming is very much a high-tech business these days, at least in North America and most of Europe (and at least for those farmers that wish to stay in business :> ).

  362. think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.thinkmobility.com/homeUK.asp

    90km/t max speed
    85 km range (at 80 km/t)

  363. Toyoa Prius by xxn1927 · · Score: 1

    I would like to point out that the Prius is a SULEV.

    Its puts out significantly less emissions then those low fuel VWs and the Insight.

    It is also huge inside, and comes with lots of kick ass features standard (power windows and door locks, . If you are into hacking, you can hack the local area network on the prius and plug video games and what not into the display screen. you can even hook up mp3 players and other cool gadgets.

  364. Go for a modern Diesel! by vogon+jeltz · · Score: 1

    Let's see:
    * power plant efficiency: nuclear ~28%, charcoal ~35%, modern gas-steam-processes ~57%; now mix it -> ~35% for the complete mix; we don't consider wind, solar and water powered plants as they only contibute around 5% to the complete mix.
    * ~90% efficiency for getting the current to your wall socket
    * 90%*35%=31.5%
    * add the efficiency of your car's AC/DC-converter and the batteries and electric engines effieciency: about 90% each. 90%^3=73%
    * multiply: 31.5%*73%=23%

    Thus about 23% of the "raw" energy is actually getting to your car's "crankshaft"!

    Modern Turbodiesel engines have a *total* efficiency of well over 40%! You do the math. Get yourself a VW-Rabbit or a Peugeot 306 (Diesel, of course). Better for the environment in any case. *Plus* you can make it run practically *any* sort of veggi oil: nut-oil, corn-oil, you name it! Biodiesel too, of course.

  365. Toyota RAV-4 electric, available in California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These are supposed to be REALLY nice. Check the Toyota website.

  366. TDI not good for pollution - in the US by idletask · · Score: 1

    > VW/Audi sells six different diesels in Europe (1.2l, 1.9l - 90hp, 1.9l - 110hp, 1.9l -115hp, 2.5l - 150hp, V8 3.3l - 225hp[available soon])

    Uhm no, they have more than that: 1.4l (not 1.2l) inline 3 with 75hp, 1.9l inline 4 with hps 90/100/110/130/150 and 2.5 V6 155/180. And then there are the other manufacturers.

    Problem is, from all these engines, only the 1.9l 90hp and 1.9l 110hp are suitable for the US market because they don't use direct Diesel injection techniques (Common Rail or pump injectors), and Diesel injection engines indeed require better grade Diesel than what's on sale in the US (sulfur ppm is too high, up to 500, EU Diesel fuel has a law-enforced 15ppm max - sulfur is the thing which is responsible for black smoke). Other manufacturers' engines ALL use direct injection techniques.

    Buying a TDI is merely a good idea in the US nowadays due to that sulfur problem, which makes it for particles emitted in the air. These are proved to be cancer agents. Maybe a TDI is a good idea if you can find an aftermarket particle filter, but given its way of operating, I seirously doubt it.

    If it's just for commuting then Honda's Insight is by far the better choice (do you really *need* more than 2 seats? And the cargo space in the hatch is not ridiculous, ya know) but you'll have to adapt your driving style.

  367. BMW Hydrogen Power by nicovdw · · Score: 1

    BMW has been working on Hydrogen Power for quite some time now. Have a look at: http://www.bmw.com/bmwe/efficient_dynamics/cleanen ergy/index.html

  368. Electric Sports Car and Conversion Options by Soulslayer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While the waiting list is pretty long and the price is high, you can get an electric car with a 100+ mile range that does the quarter mile faster than a late 90's Vette. Go see the T-Zero at A/C Propulsion's site.

    Another way to go is to find an electric car conversion shop or individual. Purchase a cheap ICE vehicle, spend another $6-$10K converting it and you have a vehicle that will last as long as the body holds up that looks like everyone elses car, but needs far less maintenence and no gasoline.

    Or you could just do the whole thing yourself. If done right your range will be between 40 and 60 miles per charge.

    Remember Optima Yellow Top deep cycle batteries are your friends.

    --


    Once more unto the breach dear friends...
  369. Re:Jetta TDI has better mileage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Granted, I'm only 6'2", but I fit in a '99 Passat with lots of room to spare (and without adjusting the seat to the extreme). However, the one I drive has comfort-level seats (extra option), I haven't driven one with standard seats.

  370. Re:Smog index is a LIE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Smog Index is a LIE!!!!

    Here's the deal:

    All diesels vehicles under 3750lbs are assigned a "1.82".

    What is this based on? Measurements? NOPE. It's based on the maximum allowable limits for Tier 1 diesel vehicles.

    It's based on the fact that all diesel vehicles are required to meet Tier I emissions standards. A VW TDI is WELL below the levels required to meet Tier 1. But it still gets a 1.82.

    Why? Because it is in the Tier 1 category.

    If it has actual emissions below that, can it qualify for a better category? Nope. Why? Because that's the only category.

    I looked up the actual EPA test data for the TDI. It's well below. It almost qualifies for LEV. Yes, the NOx and PM are higher, but only a little bit higher, in reality. And that's running EPA diesel #2. I live in California and run on CARB diesel - with much lower sulfur and much higher cetane and lower aromatic content. So my actual emissions are far below the tested figures.

    Actually, lately I've been buying Arco ECD-1 diesel, which is as good as anything sold in Europe, at 15ppm.

  371. Re:Honda Insight! (70mpg, D/E Hybrid, No Rechargin by @madeus · · Score: 2

    Hmm yes your right, I swear when I first saw this ~>2 years ago the review said it was a Diesel, not gas.

    I wonder if Honda make one that looks like the Insight (as I couldnt swear the one I saw was called an "Insight", just that it was a Honda), or maybe the rep just got it wrong :/

  372. green cars by scaryman · · Score: 0

    there is an article about green cars (not cars painted green ;) ) in this months physics world http://physicsweb.org/article/world/15/7/9

  373. Re:Fuel per acre by markmoss · · Score: 2

    True, tractors don't burn that much fuel, but there are other energy inputs required. Typical fertilizer production (primarily nitrates synthesized from air) is extremely energy-intensive. Pesticides take some energy. Hauling the fertilizer to the farm takes a little, hauling the corn away takes more. Fermentation and distillation take a considerable input of heat. Overall, using the methods most common in America for each step, you'd get more ethanol per barrel of oil by directly converting it in a factory rather than growing corn - and with less labor and capital investment. This is reflected in a lower price for synthesized ethanol...

    OTOH, maybe the methods could change without cutting the yield too much. For example: synthetic fertilizer (nitrates made from air) requires a lot of energy - but (in the US at least) feedlot operators often have trouble disposing of their natural fertilizer byproduct. It takes labor, machinery, and some fuel to haul the manure to the farms, spread it, and clean up. And for some reason, it's hard to hire people for this work... So with the price of energy held down by government policies in the US, the synthetic nitrates are cheaper than picking up "free" manure a few hundred miles away.

  374. Alcohol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think alcohol is the way to go. It's cheap. Existing cars can easily be adapted to it so people who can't afford new cars can continue to user theirs. We can stop paying farmers to not grow crops and they can actually grow grain for their own profit.

    The downside of alcohol is that it does not produce the same BTU's per volume as gasoline, so your fuel milage is nearly half with alcohol. It's also more flamable than gas and you can't see the flame in daylight. It is also corrosive to certain metals, and so a few fuel system components would need to be replaced... not a biggie.

    I think pure electrical is bad because they are not zero emmisions as many environmentalist would have you think... they need electricity, electricty needs to come from power plants, power plants produce polution. I am an environmentalist by the way.

    Hybrids are complex and are more difficult to repair... plus they are weak.

    Hydrogen is cool, but old cars would not be easily adapted.

    In the context of polution, ARCO said some years ago that they can produce a very clean gasoline, but that people were not willing to pay the temporary extra cost. In a gas shortage context, I wish somebody would explain the economics of mass produced synthetic gasoline to monitor how viable it is.

    Abdul

  375. reminds me of Mr. Bean by Sabalon · · Score: 2

    reminds me a reverse of the blue three-wheel car that was Mr. Bean's nemesis in a couple of episodes.

  376. Re:Hempcar Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The hempcar japan site is here.hempcar japan

  377. Build your own by bluGill · · Score: 2

    It isn't for everyone, but Lindsay sells several books on how to convert or build alternative fuel cars. From my last catalog (not everyone is online, so get the dead tree catalog - every geek should have it anyway) I recall books on cars that run on Steam, Wood, Hydrogen, and Elctric. Some of the designs are more dangerious than you want to use, and some are obsolete, but they are still a good starting point. Convert your current engine to a new fuel, replace the engine with something else, or build your own horseless carrage.

    Expiriment with weird things like the Atkinson cycle engine, tesla turbine, Stirling cycle engine. Make a solar charger with cells you build yourself. Make your own alcohol. Put a windmill on the roof and get free power (good luck overcoming some pesty laws of physics on this one). There is probable something about fuel cells in there too.

  378. What's included by Spamalamadingdong · · Score: 2
    One REALLY big question... does the 131,000 BTU figure include the energy absorbed from the sun?
    No; most of that winds up as heat (of course, much of it would wind up as heat pretty much regardless of what it landed on). Again IIRC, the figure only accounts for inputs in the form of:
    • Fuel for cultivation and spraying;
    • Fertilizer and pesticides; and
    • Processing and distillation of the product.
    If we were just trying to get off imported oil for motor fuel, the way to go would be to use CNG, LNG or oxidize methane to methanol to make liquid motor fuel. There are a bunch of manufacturers making cars that run on M85.
  379. Re:a couplet of ideas: My cycling experience by Pauly · · Score: 2
    First of all, HOW IN THE WORLD can you cycle when it's below freezing out???

    Here in Chicago, we've made an art out of it. In particular, o local Bike Winter advocate has written a veritable howto article.

    I've already gotten my bike stolen this summer when it was locked up the only place I could find outside.

    That sucks, I know the feeling. My advice is to go even cheaper next time. Get a ratty looking old dependable bike like a schwinn or raleigh from your local thrift scene. Or if you're anywhere near Chicago, Central America or the Caribbean hook up with the Working Bikes co-op. There's a list of similar organizations all over the US here.

    Why do I have to be so poor and cars so expensive!

    Hmm, I think it has something to do with the American Dream, or some other conspiracy. ;)

  380. Jetta TDI DOES NOT have better mileage by mrv · · Score: 1

    gasoline and diesel are both fossil fuels.

    diesel (city/highway):
    VW Jetta TDI manual: 42/49 MPG
    VW Jetta TDI auto: 34/45 MPG

    gasoline (city/highway):
    Honda Civic hybrid manual: 46/51 MPG
    Honda Civic hybrid auto: 48/47 MPG
    Toyota Prius auto: 52/45 MPG
    Honda Insight auto: 57/56 MPG
    Honda Insight manual: 61/70 MPG

    of course, there's always the caveat of your mileage may vary. lifetime MPG (1.5 years, 13k miles) on my Prius is 48MPG, although I have seen 68MPG on a tankful once. Some Insight drivers have reported over 100MPG on their tanks.

    --
    -mrv
  381. Toyota burns cleaner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to Toyota site:
    Prius is so clean-burning that it has been certified as a Super Ultra Low Emission Vehicle (SULEV).* What this means is that Prius runs nearly 75 percent cleaner than the standard for Ultra Low Emission Vehicles (Honda hybrid)

  382. Re:TDI Turbo Direct Inject Diesel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have put over 10k miles on my VW Passat TDI running 100% (B100 as they say) biodiesel, derived from recycled fryer oil.

    The power deficit you mention is unnoticable in this car, and the car runs smoother too. Smells better, actually pleasant (if you like french fries ;-) The problem you mention with fuel lines has not happened to me; one or two others with older cars on the tdi formum (www.tdiclub.com) did have a problem with the lines weeping but they easily replaced them. I've heard new cars won't have this problem because they use better material in their lines.

    I'm getting about the same mpg as with dino fuel, about 47mpg combined city and highway. And this is a real car, comfortable, 3500 lbs, not a toy like the hybrids.

    It is a new technology and requires a little know-how to use but it's available now (although the distribution is spotty and cost variable currently). I enjoy being off fossil fuels...

    I think biodiesel will soon surpass all other alternative fuels. And the nice thing is, the car can use regular old dino diesel if you need fuel out on the highway - although with an 800 mile cruise range I rarely need to bother with that. I have my biodiesel in a 275 gallon tote at home.

  383. Don't believe the hype by Quila · · Score: 2

    I'm constantly behind fairly new VW and Audi (same thing) diesels on the road that spew diesel smoke. The brand-new ones don't, but after a year or so they start spewing smoke when the driver hits the gas, and it goes downhill from there.

    I'm very sensitive to diesel smoke (makes me sick), so I notice it every time.

  384. Any car would do... by chanio · · Score: 0

    As long as I've heard from gas users, any fuel car is able to be transformed in a gas car (where you can switch between both sources at any moment)... You only need space under the seats to carry the gas bottle which's size determines the hours of autonomy of the car...
    What I do not know well is if there is any car that works with a real alternative energy like Hydrogen. There was an interesting article about it some months ago in Slashdot. It was about the discovery of huge sources of hydrogen.

    --
    Rwe obliged 2 save our future by choosing:O3 hole-greenhouse effect instead of accepting everydays gossip-nonsense chat?