Slashdot Mirror


George Lucas Speaks on Trilogy Changes

Warlock7 writes "Yahoo has posted an interview with George Lucas by the AP on the changes to the original trilogy from the new DVD box set. They also discuss the future of the franchise and the direction he intends to take it."

759 comments

  1. Let me be the first to say: by Seoulstriker · · Score: 5, Funny

    1) Han shoots first.
    2) Lucas destroyed my childhood.
    3) Lucas eats babies.

    --
    I am defenseless. Use your button. Mod me down with all of your hatred.
    1. Re:Let me be the first to say: by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      4) Which of us had the biggest rock!

    2. Re:Let me be the first to say: by Negatyfus · · Score: 4, Funny

      Leia: "Luke, I am your mother!"

      Luke: "Nooooooo!"

    3. Re:Let me be the first to say: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      This time, the Empire strikes first.

    4. Re:Let me be the first to say: by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny
      R2D2: Beep boop wheeep zoop beeyoop! (translation: Be honest, what was I actually?)

      C3PO: Oh, I'm afraid you were originaly designed as mobile trash compactor.

      R2D2: Dweep! Dweep! Dweep! (translation: Noooooooo!)

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    5. Re:Let me be the first to say: by Cheile · · Score: 1

      I've often wondered why someone doesn't re-edit the dvd cut to include the origional scene and release it on some P2P network. Sure, yes there would be C&D letters and threats and all of that, but if the "success" that the RIAA/MPAA has had up to this point is any indication it probably would be hard to stop.

    6. Re:Let me be the first to say: by Bjimba · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, even better, someone *has* converted the laserdisc versions of IV, V, and VII (pre-SD) into a DVD-R ready format, and they *are* being distributed over the usual underground channels.

      You know where to go.

      --
      --- question = 0xFF; // optimized Hamlet
    7. Re:Let me be the first to say: by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      Well, until then, there's always the Laserdisc rip that's on Suprnova.org and probably elsewhere. I've heard the original 4:3 letterboxed version has pretty good quality. The one on SN seems to be the lower quality anamorphic one though.

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    8. Re:Let me be the first to say: by DarKnyht · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Buy or Buy not, there is no original versions." -- Lucas

      --
      Voting them all out of office, now that's change I can believe in.
    9. Re:Let me be the first to say: by pulse2600 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Padme: Anakin, I am your mother...

      Anakin: EWW!!! I just farked my mom!!!!!!!!!

      Padme: Don't be upset, I have some great news!

      Anakin: What's that?

      Padme: No, I just saved a bunch of money on my speeder insurance by switching to GEICO!!!!!

    10. Re:Let me be the first to say: by robochan · · Score: 4, Informative

      This isn't the trilogy you're looking for.

      --
      ...Rob
      The American Dream isn't an SUV and a house in the suburbs; it's Don't Tread On Me.
    11. Re:Let me be the first to say: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up, George, and go back to your ranch, or you'll be late for roasted baby-on-a-stick.

    12. Re:Let me be the first to say: by dark_panda · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually, in the new version of Ep 4, Alderaan shoots first. The Death Star was just acting in self defense as Lucas originally intended.

      J

    13. Re:Let me be the first to say: by ArcticCelt · · Score: 4, Funny

      Admiral Ackbar: Zoidberg I am your father! Dr. Zoidberg: Blb dlb blb blb blb blblbllb!!!

      --

      Yahh, hiii haaaaa! -Major Kong, from Dr. Strangelove
    14. Re:Let me be the first to say: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Dingo ate my baby!

    15. Re:Let me be the first to say: by dosius · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Several people have made DVD-Rs and VIDEO_TS torrents of the original trilogy.

      I might point out the petition to get the original Star Wars released in its original edition. Sign, sign, sign! XDDDDD

      Moll.

      --
      What you hear in the ear, preach from the rooftop Matthew 10.27b
    16. Re:Let me be the first to say: by couldntthinkupagoodn · · Score: 1

      4) ??? 5) Profit!

    17. Re:Let me be the first to say: by jmole · · Score: 5, Funny

      George Lucas: "Luke, I am your father.

      Luke:"Nooooooo!"

      George Lucas: "Join the darkside and together we can digitially remaster Indiana Jones with more CG."

      Luke:"Nooooooo!"

      Admiral Ackbar: "Luke, it's a trap!"

    18. Re:Let me be the first to say: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The empire struck first before too unless Lucas re-wrote that part of the story too.

    19. Re:Let me be the first to say: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the Empire strikes first
      Too bad that's already the name of a Bad Religion album. It's pretty clever.

    20. Re:Let me be the first to say: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't the trilogy I'm looking for. You can go about your business.

    21. Re:Let me be the first to say: by thunderpeel · · Score: 1

      Well, as much as the fanboys want the origional it is his idea to change.
      Hell, if he wanted to anything to the series it is his basic right to do so. If I were to create a song, then re-release it years later, with a different instrument here and there and a changed tempo, why would people care?
      Yes, I understand the whole hearted viciously rabbid fanboy side of this, I love the origionals as much as anyone else. But to say he cant do it, is foolish.
      That being said, Han shoots first, and the whole prequel idea was a mistake.

      --
      I really do know KungFu .. ..
    22. Re:Let me be the first to say: by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Original Star wars: story about the Jedis vs the evil empire (good film)
      1st generation 'tweaks': story the same, with added footage, which looks like crap
      2nd genertation 'tweaks': story changed slightly, more crap scenes added

      continuing along this line of Lucas not being able to leave the films along:

      100th generation 'tweaks': Film looks like it was originally done totally in CGI, not real actors and the the film is totally crap. People bought the last 99 iterations, so Lucas and co. thought 'new characters: even more franchise money'.

      Heck, had Leonardo DaVinci had the same approach as Lucas, then the Mona Lisa would have had a moustache and other poor additions.

      Please George Lucas release the orginal cut on DVD!!!

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    23. Re:Let me be the first to say: by darth_linux · · Score: 1

      so the Rebellion Strikes Back?

      --
      Power to the Penguin!
    24. Re:Let me be the first to say: by NarrMaster · · Score: 1
      --
      That's right. All your base.
    25. Re:Let me be the first to say: by danger_boy_13 · · Score: 1
      1) Han shoots first.
      Unfortunately, Han doesn't shoot first, it is almost simultaneous, which is an improvement, but definitely not back to the original.
    26. Re:Let me be the first to say: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean "are" not "is", or you could have said "original version".

      Either, way the verb form is incorrect.;)

    27. Re:Let me be the first to say: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how about... the Empire strikes front?

    28. Re:Let me be the first to say: by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Some authors *DO* change their works throughout their lives. Walt Whitman only wrote one book -- Leaves of Grass -- which he added to and changed constantly, releasing different versions throughout his life.

      Of course, Walt Whitman was an artist, and Lucas is a fucking hack of a producer who should let his directors, editors and cinematographers do their job and make his films into more than just a perfect version of one man's ambitious imagination.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    29. Re:Let me be the first to say: by TrevorB · · Score: 1

      Yoda: Destroyed my childhood, he has.

      I'd just like to see Yoda, ala the end of Episode 2, slicing and dicing the film reels of Eps 1 and 2 into tiny little pieces that slip through Lucas' fingers the tighter he grasps...

      Because of course, if Lucas stopped at 3 films, the series would become more powerful than he could possibly imagine.

      I'll stop now...

    30. Re:Let me be the first to say: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Dear Captain Cocksmack,

      Had you said "different lyrics" instead of "different instrument here and there and a changed tempo" then you might've had a point as absurdly wrong as it is by nature.
      Lucas did more than change the tempo. He's enforcing retroactive continuity on this franchise. For example there's an egregious change to the scene involving Vader and the Emperor speaking to each other in TESB. Moreso Han shooting first. If Lucas was simply using a different instrument or changing the tempo then Han would've used a lightsaber to defend himself against a Greedo who was hasted by a high level elven mage.
      Lucas can do it, I can do it, anyone can do it nowadays with a big enough computer and enough time to spend on the project. It's about a relatively lame feeling of betrayal that Lucas never meant for Han Solo to be redeemed from a scoundrel into a hero. It's about changing everything which was good and cool about Star Wars, a movie which really didn't talk down to kids, and decided to nice it up because he knocked up some dopey bitches and he's stuck with the kids and he wants them to watch it in the safest way possible.

      Much Love,

      Robert Malda
      Holland, Michigan 2004

    31. Re:Let me be the first to say: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obi-Wan: Luke, that's not your mother, that's a SPACE STATION!

    32. Re:Let me be the first to say: by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Obi-Wan: "This isn't the Trilogy you're looking for." Storm Trooper: "This isn't the Trilogy we're looking for." Obi-Wan: "Let these special effects veriosns pass." Storm Trooper: "Let these special effects versions pass." Obi-Wan: "Let us be forgotten." Storm Trooper (waving them through): "Forget these special editions."

    33. Re:Let me be the first to say: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, only on slashdot it is possible to see someone lecturing someone else on how to use plural verb forms. And only on slashdot there is someone complaining to someone who is lecturing..

      --
      This post and the parent is proof that you are reading SLASHDOT - you will never find a more wretched hive of nerds and dipshits.

    34. Re:Let me be the first to say: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My god.... toward the end of the movie he actully confirms his position as a douche-bag that doesn't give a damn about fans or artistic merit, just money. May he die a horribly painful death, like a lightsaber up his ass.

    35. Re:Let me be the first to say: by dnixon112 · · Score: 1

      No, it was a pre-emptive strike on a terrorist planet.

    36. Re:Let me be the first to say: by MulluskO · · Score: 1

      But there were WMD on Alderaan! We swears it!

      --

      Too busy staying alive... ~ R.A.
    37. Re:Let me be the first to say: by taernim · · Score: 2, Informative

      While I do support the idea and agree Lucas has bastardized what used to be classics, if you RTFA, you'd see that when asked if he cares or is affected by critics of his choices, he said no.

      So the petition is likely going to fall on completely deaf ears.

      --
      "PC Load Letter? What the $@#% does that mean?!"
    38. Re:Let me be the first to say: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, even in the original one it was just a perfectly legal preemptive strike.

    39. Re:Let me be the first to say: by Maserati · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ok, if we're going to go there...

      A furious light sabre duel is under way. DARTH VADER is backing LUKE SKYWALKER toward the end of the gantry. A quick move by Vader, chops off Luke's hand! It goes spinning off into the ventilation shaft. Luke

      looks round, but realizes there's nowhere to go but straight down.

      DARTH VADER: "Obi Wan never told you what happened to your father."

      LUKE: "He told me enough! He told me you killed him!"

      DARTH VADER: "No! I am your father!"

      LUKE: "No, that's not true! That's impossible."

      DARTH VADER: "Search your feelings; you know it to be true."

      LUKE: "NO!"

      DARTH VADER: "Yes, it is true and you know what else? You know that queer brass droid of yours?"

      LUKE: "Threepio?"

      DARTH VADER: "Yes, Threepio, I built him when I was 7 years old."

      LUKE: "No."

      DARTH VADER: "Seven years old! And what have you done? Look at yourself, no hand, no job, and couldn't even levitate your own ship
      out of the swamp."

      LUKE: "I destroyed your precious Death Star!"

      DARTH VADER: "When you were 20! When I was 10, I single-handedly destroyed a Trade Federation Droid Control ship!"

      LUKE: "Well, it's not my fault."

      DARTH VADER: "Oh, here we go. 'Poor me, my father never gave me what I

      wanted for my birthday, boo hoo, my daddy's the Dark Lord of the Sith...waahhh wahhh!' You make me sick."

      LUKE: "Shut up!"

      DARTH VADER: "You're a slacker! By the time I was your age, I had exterminated the Jedi Knights!"

      LUKE: "I used to race my T-16 through Beggar's Canyon!"

      DARTH VADER: "Oh, for the love of God, 10 years old, winner of the Boonta Eve Open. Only human to ever fly a Pod Racer, right here baby!"

      Luke looks down the shaft. Takes a step toward it.

      DARTH VADER: "I was wrong. You're not my kid. I don't know whose you are, but you sure ain't mine. Get out of my sight, you loser!"

      Luke takes a step off the platform, hesitates, then plunges down the shaft. Darth Vader looks after him.

      DARTH VADER: "AND GET A HAIRCUT!"

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
    40. Re:Let me be the first to say: by Total_Wimp · · Score: 1

      This isn't the trilogy you're looking for.

      This sucks. I've been hoping for years now that someday I would have relief. After suffering through epI and II I was really really looking forward to the day when I could put that home theater system to good use for the origninals.

      But that lines says it all. It's not what I'm looking for. Lucas has heard our cry that we don't want to drink mud and has given us stagnant pond water as an alternative. Let me know when he decides to offer the pure spring water to his thirsty fans.

      TW

    41. Re:Let me be the first to say: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn right. And Luke doesn't scream as he's falling off the parapet either. Lucas is a sick son of a bitch.

    42. Re:Let me be the first to say: by BloodAngel_Au · · Score: 1

      May I just say

      Bwaahhaaahahahahahahaa.....

      bQ9hf3PN (rofl)

    43. Re:Let me be the first to say: by pteaxwa · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Aldous Huxley wrote this in regard to a later edition of Brave New World:

      To pore over the literary shortcomings of twenty years ago, to attempt to patch a faulty work into perfection it missed at its first execution, to spend one's middle age in trying to mend the artistic sins committed and bequeathed by that different person who was oneself in youth - all this is surely vain and futile. And that is why this new Brave New World is the same as the old one. Its defects as a work of art are considerable; but in order to correct them I should have to rewrite the book - and in the process of rewriting, as an older, other person, I should probably get rid not only of some of the faults of the story, but also of such merits as it originally possessed. And so, resisting temptation to wallow in artistic remorse, I prefer to leave both well and ill alone and to think about something else.

      Too bad Lucas didn't read that before engaging in the Special Edition movies.
      Of course, the taste of vomit in my mouth, post Lucas abominations, has really gotten quite tolerable.

    44. Re:Let me be the first to say: by Sunnan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've been thinking about that...
      The prequel trilogy seems to be more extreme than the original. Will it really work to watch them in the supposed chronological order? (Of course, the movies will go from worse to better, that's one advantage...)

    45. Re:Let me be the first to say: by JofCoRe · · Score: 1

      Of course, the movies will go from worse to better, that's one advantage...)

      Until you watch Return of the Jedi with all those little ewoks running around and wonder how a movie like Empire could have led into ... "The Ewoks Save the Rebellion"... :)

      --

      Place sig here.
  2. Mirrors modern society? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll
    Han shot first? Dictator of choice had WMDs?

    Seems like his edits to the movies are an insightful yet unintentional comment on how people whitewash history in real life too.

    After the empire was defeted (ep 6), the earlier histories get re-written.

    1. Re:Mirrors modern society? by Monsieur+Canard · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No no.

      It mirrors modern society in that if there's a way to milk a cash cow, someone will be standing there with a bucket.

      --
      He took a duck to the face at 250 knots.
    2. Re:Mirrors modern society? by Slime-dogg · · Score: 1

      The best part is when they asked "Do you ever listen to your fans' opinions about this?" And he says "No."

      It's a pity that we feel this compulsion to shove money down Lucas's throat.

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    3. Re:Mirrors modern society? by unother · · Score: 1

      Personally, I feel the best part was when they mentioned the interview occurred "over lunch at his 2,600-acre Skywalker Ranch."

      Ditto on your second paragraph.

    4. Re:Mirrors modern society? by scaaven · · Score: 1

      he's an entertainer. if you don't like his entertainment, then don't "shove money down Lucas's throat."

      --
      I know I'm going to be modded up on this
    5. Re:Mirrors modern society? by NymblZ · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The best part is when they asked "Do you ever listen to your fans' opinions about this?" And he says "No."
      It's a pity that we feel this compulsion to shove money down Lucas's throat.


      Well, that was a double-edged question, really.
      Had he said yes, then he might be construed by some as a sellout with no real vision of his own, who packages his art for maximum market value.
      His answer struck me as a little cocky too at first, but when he finished his answer I felt I could respect his perspective.
      For example, how many decent bands mold themselves to what their fans want ?
      Hey Aerosmith, play more songs in A# minor !"
      The good ones follow their artistic instincts. Those who like it follow, those who don't, follow somebody else (or make their own).

      --
      -- NymblZ
      Ignorance is a sty in the mind's eye
  3. direction he intends to take it... by selderrr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    /me is shocked !

    you mean that, no only this thing is going somewhere, it also has a direction ????

    Stop the presses !

    oh comeon please. Lucas a had one original idea a long time ago (in a galaxy far away probably) and milked it like no one has ever milked an idea before. I wishi everyone would just stop talking about him, then maybe he'd be forced to poop another idea instead of trampling in previous poop.

    1. Re:direction he intends to take it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And now he is going to milk it to death as a TV show. Star Trek is not going to be alone in the "how long can this last" arena.

    2. Re:direction he intends to take it... by BurritoWarrior · · Score: 1

      I guess you never saw Raiders of the Lost Ark.

    3. Re:direction he intends to take it... by phyruxus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't need Lucas to tell me where he's taking Star Wars, I know a handbasket when I see one. :)

      --
      "A witty saying proves nothing." ~Voltaire
      "d'Oh!" ~Homer
    4. Re:direction he intends to take it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude could you like try to type a single sentance without making a mistake? Geez!

    5. Re:direction he intends to take it... by attam · · Score: 1

      milked it like no one has ever milked an idea before

      bill gates might have something to say about that

    6. Re:direction he intends to take it... by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 0

      Whoa, so you're saying the man has had two original ideas in the past thirty years?

      Astonishing.

      - A.P.

      --
      "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    7. Re:direction he intends to take it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, could you try to use fucking spellcheck before you rag on somebody about their mistakes? Geez!

    8. Re:direction he intends to take it... by master_p · · Score: 1

      "Lucas a had one original idea a long time ago"

      What original idea? he copied Japanese movies and anime: Space Battleship Yamato, the 7th samurai, etc.

    9. Re:direction he intends to take it... by B1ackD0g · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's easy to slam him because he's being a butthead today, and I hate to be a troll or anything, but what have you or any of us created that has had the impact of Star Wars on society in general?

      The original release of this somewhat original movie (really just a western in space, written many times by then in book form) made SF widely acceptable in the mainstream. I'd have to say that it was stunning at the time. I remember that we all rode home in silence after that flick. The effects of those movies are still felt today. I wish I had one idea that would have this type of positive effect on the world.

      Alas, I only read slashdot.

      --
      When I'm feeling down, I like to whistle. It makes the neighbor's dog run to the end of his chain and gag himself.
    10. Re:direction he intends to take it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two more than you.

    11. Re:direction he intends to take it... by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps I'm just not a whore.

      - A.P.

      --
      "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    12. Re:direction he intends to take it... by Thud457 · · Score: 1
      Hey, "Young Indiana Jones" was pretty good, and had high production values. (Reportedly so high they couldn't afford to make any more.)

      Oooops, wrong Lucasberg!

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    13. Re:direction he intends to take it... by Mr.+BS · · Score: 0

      Just as long as Lucas doesn't decide to boldly go where no man... uh one... has gone before.... I'll be happy!

    14. Re:direction he intends to take it... by MadMacSkillz · · Score: 1

      I was JUST about to post a comment that said essentially the same thing. "Boo hoo, we all hate George Lucas and he's Satan and worse than Bill Gates and he's only concerned with money." My question to the whiners would be, "What have you contributed to Science Fiction? Oh, NOTHING? Then shut the fuck up." Fortunately I don't give a rat's ass about "karma." Certainly, I'll be flamed, just as certainly as I won't bother reading the flames. But seriously, it's one thing to disagree with George's choices, and it's another to vilify him. If you feel THAT strongly about a movie series, perhaps it's time to get a part time job, save up some money, and buy a real life.

      --
      Music - www.richardmac.com
    15. Re:direction he intends to take it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, I could have sworn I saw you and Kobe Bryant near a hotel the other night...

  4. Quoth George: by rde · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Star Wars" fans is they're very independent-thinking people. They all think outside the box

    Yeah, and then they buy it five times over the next few years.

    1. Re:Quoth George: by nastro · · Score: 1

      Am I simply jaded when this sounds to me like stroking the fan base?

      I mean, when I read it, I even heard the Billy Squire song in my head.

      Of course, I'm insane, but never-the-less...

    2. Re:Quoth George: by Zorilla · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Some scenes in the new Star Wars movies make me wonder if Lucas is really thinking outside the box. One scene that comes to mind is where Obi Wan goes to visit an old friend who runs a diner that looks waaay too much like a typical American roadside diner. Surely there could have been a more far reaching idea than that. It is supposed to be on another galaxy.

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    3. Re:Quoth George: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he had some stock left over from American Graffitti?

      Luke, I am Wolfman Jack!

    4. Re:Quoth George: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Charles Dickens was notorious for getting his fans to buy his book Pickwick Papers 4 different times. History views that as clever. Will time be any less kind to George Lucas?

    5. Re:Quoth George: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Star Wars" fans is they're very independent-thinking people. They all think outside the box.

      Unfortunately, they all tend to think in the same little spot outside the box.

    6. Re:Quoth George: by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      Some scenes in the new Star Wars movies make me wonder if Lucas is really thinking outside the box. One scene that comes to mind is where Obi Wan goes to visit an old friend who runs a diner that looks waaay too much like a typical American roadside diner.

      Wait a second... I haven't been following these new DVDs being released... I thought it was just the Special Editions that were released in the theaters before the prequils came out... Are you saying they added -more-!?

      -matt

    7. Re:Quoth George: by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      I was actually making a statement in response to the parent quote about Star Wars fans thinking outside the box. It was just a general example I was giving. The only additional changes to the DVD from the 1997 theatrical releases have already been mentioned before.

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    8. Re:Quoth George: by Ashyukun · · Score: 1

      Assuming you're not trying to be humorous- the scene being referred to was in Episode 2: Attack of The Suck.

    9. Re:Quoth George: by The+Other+White+Boy · · Score: 1

      yes, this is the special editions, but with even more changes made beyond that. we kid you not.

    10. Re:Quoth George: by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One scene that comes to mind is where Obi Wan goes to visit an old friend who runs a diner that looks waaay too much like a typical American roadside diner.

      Well, Mos Eisley canteen also looks a bit like a bikers bar somewhere along Route-66 (in the glorious days of yore). Lucas never really tried to escape from the American pop-cultural icons. Luke Skywalker's frustration on his uncle's farm reflects George's frustration in his youth in Modesto, when he was dreaming of going to study in Los Angeles, but his dad wouldn't accept that. The pod racers from "Phantom Menace" are not really far from hot-rods that Modesto youngsters were building in their garages. The Palpatines' path to power reflects that of Richard Nixon (notice: I don't judge Nixon now, just think how a young bearded liberal California filmmaker percepted Tricky Dick in early 1970's). So - yes, the galaxy Far Far Away is actually America. Hell, they even talk English! :-)

    11. Re:Quoth George: by EpsCylonB · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Can't remember who said it...

      "The secret of great sci fi is that it isn't commenting on the future, its commenting on the present."

    12. Re:Quoth George: by arose · · Score: 1

      History knows computers and internet were not around.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    13. Re:Quoth George: by Tassach · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Mos Eisley canteen also looks a bit like a bikers bar somewhere along Route-66
      Actually, the Mos Eisley canteen scene is almost an exact line-for-line rehash of a similar scene from the Kurosawa film Yojimbo. Yojimbo is probably the most ripped-off movie in history. A Fistful of Dollars, Miller's Crossing, and Last Man Standing are all remakes of this classic.
      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    14. Re:Quoth George: by I_M_Noman · · Score: 1
      I don't judge Nixon now, just think how a young bearded liberal California filmmaker percepted Tricky Dick in early 1970's
      Percepted?
    15. Re:Quoth George: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > the galaxy Far Far Away is actually America

      America is a continent, not a country. I think what you meant is "the United States OF America."

      (I'm half kidding here, laugh with me) :-)

    16. Re:Quoth George: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      of course they have to think outside the box, they haven't been inside the box since the moment before their birth.

    17. Re:Quoth George: by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      Have any of the obsessive Star Wars geeks published a comprehensive changelog?

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    18. Re:Quoth George: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      America is a continent, not a country. I think what you meant is "the United States OF America."

      No, America is two continents( North AND South).

      (I'm just trying to make fun of the parent's lame attempt at hummor with an eqaully bad attempt. Oh, the Irony! cringe with me) :-{

    19. Re:Quoth George: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, no. Not sure what scene you'd be thinking about, but the closest one I can think of is when Sanjuro slices down a few toughs in front of Seibei's shop, which is almost nothing like the cantina.

    20. Re:Quoth George: by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      Here is the #1 result on Google when searching for the changes. I actually read it a few days ago. Way more changes are in there than I ever remembered when I saw it in 1997.

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    21. Re:Quoth George: by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 4, Funny

      They all think outside the box

      Outside the box? These are people that don't remove collectibles from their original packaging.

    22. Re:Quoth George: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      California has always been a "Galaxy far,far away..."

    23. Re:Quoth George: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, they even talk English!
      That's because of the Universal translators Gene Roddenberry had put into all TV sets and Film projectors for Star Trek. You see, Gene was thinking ahead, he knew that he was Star Trek movies was going to be produced. ;)

    24. Re:Quoth George: by Coryoth · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's the only scene that comes to mind for me as well - Though I can see some similarities. Mostly in the bragging language used by the young toughs, and the very calm attitude of Sanjuro compares well with Obi Wan once he tries to bail Luke out of trouble. Certainly not a direct rip off, but some very clear influences.

      One must remember that while Star Wars was based on Hidden Fortress, the Mifune character in that case was split to create both Han and Obi Wan (the two sides of a complex character become two separate characters). I think, in turn Mifune's character in Yojimbo and Sanjuro was an influence on Both Han and Obi Wan. I would suggest this to be a very strong argument for Lucas' having Han shoot first - consider the scene we're discussing in front of Seibei's shop - a similar fairly callous approach by our hero.

      Jedidiah.

    25. Re:Quoth George: by ghoda_x · · Score: 0

      Hell, they even talk English! :-)

      That's becasue they all have a babelfish. ;)


      --

      Give me but one firm spot on which to stand, and I will move the earth.
      - Archimedes
    26. Re:Quoth George: by wolssiloa · · Score: 1

      it's not English; they are actually speaking Basic. But it turns out, it is exactly the same thing!

    27. Re:Quoth George: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10 Print "Buy Star Wars DVD's! - GL"
      20 Goto 10

      (would be in caps for you purists, but /. won't allow that)

  5. The Missing Question by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny
    As we all know, editors often strip out items they consider unimportant or trivial to make an artical fit, or as the saying goes, "All the news that fits, in print" Here are the missing bits:

    AP: Will there be any other surprises for viewers in these episodes? Lucas: Well, I was quoted a while back as stating the whole Star Wars story is about Anakin Skywalker, his turn to the dark side and eventual rescue by his own son, but that was only half the whole truth, you see as I said a film is only half finished which ripped out of the filmmakers hands, this is really the story of Jar Jar Binks and he has been added into key rolls in all three episodes. I like the character and don't care what anyone else thinks.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:The Missing Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's like Nike says: "Just Do This".

    2. Re:The Missing Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or as Lemony Snickett puts it "All the news in fits of print"

    3. Re:The Missing Question by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      Dude, you really don't get it, do you? The poster obviously knows the original phrase: he's just repeating a rephrased version editors (might?) use, because that better describes what they do. The paraphrased saying shows you what really happens, as oposed to the hackneyed saying which is what everyone uses. He even explains that (up to a point) in his post.

      My god...I can't beleive I'm trying to explain this...go get a clue about satire, you pedantic clod.

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    4. Re:The Missing Question by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I wrote for a paper once, my columns were regularly 'edited'* to fit the available page space. Read some the pedant should read some newspaper articles some time and wonder why certain things are repeated and restated in different words, the answer is because the writer has no idea what will eventually end up in print, after so many inches it's usually drivel.

      I'd had enough and decided my words were to valuable to be so butchered so I left for another profession, programmer, where I could work for hours or weeks on a project just to see it die anyway.

      * Chopped, Hacked, Mangled, etc. to make writer look like damn fool.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    5. Re:The Missing Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Read some the pedant should read some newspaper articles some time and wonder why certain things are repeated and restated in different words, the answer is because the writer has no idea what will eventually end up in print, after so many inches it's usually drivel."

      If you wrote like that for the paper, I can see why you were edited so often... Now you're a programmer? The way you write, it's got to be at Microsoft. Are you the one responsible for adding buggy, confusing bloat to what would otherwise be a decent piece of software?

    6. Re:The Missing Question by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't surprise me if we find that jar jar has been inserted into the background somewhere in the new dvd versions.

      My money is on the celebration section at the end of ROTJ.

    7. Re:The Missing Question by jejagua · · Score: 1

      "...this is really the story of Jar Jar Binks..."

      OMG..this is the worse travesty ever imposed on mankind!

      --
      http://www.techyrants.com
    8. Re:The Missing Question by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      I think this has already been announced. I seem to recall hearing that an elderly jar jar will be the gungan leader, and the celebration will show naboo as well.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    9. Re:The Missing Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hayden Christensen (sp? - like who cares) has been edited into the holograph ghost scene at the end.

      There's a quicktime movie of it floating around somewhere. If you can't find it, send me an email: victor.orly@gmail.com and I'll send it.

      I'd post a URL, but I'd much rather help google load-test gmail then have my webserver slashdotted.

    10. Re:The Missing Question by Graff · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I wrote for a paper once, my columns were regularly 'edited'* to fit the available page space. Read some the pedant should read some newspaper articles some time and wonder why certain things are repeated and restated in different words, the answer is because the writer has no idea what will eventually end up in print, after so many inches it's usually drivel.

      A good newspaper journalist writes in an "inverted pyramid", the most important facts first and then the trivial details later on. The idea is that if an editor wants to trim the story he can just start trimming at the end of the story and then he doesn't have to pick through the article to essentially re-write it. The best article will answer all of the 5 most important questions (who, what, where, why, and how) in the first paragraph. An article that has an introductory sentence which doesn't get a start on the 5 questions is probably written by a non-professional journalist.

      There are a lot of newspaper writers who obviously never took a journalism course and so they don't write in an "inverted pyramid", it's those writers who repeat and restate things because they have no clue what will get cut out. An editor going through their articles would simply have to cut the stuff that seems least important, at times just randomly cutting stuff because he's in a hurry and doesn't have the time to carefully re-do the article.
    11. Re:The Missing Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    12. Re:The Missing Question by gamgee5273 · · Score: 1

      Naboo is in the closing of ROTJ (check out thedigitalbits.com for screenshots), but I have not heard that Jar-Jar is in that scene...

  6. the direction he intends to take it ... by Bai+jie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    He intends to take it to the bank, along with everything he does.

    1. Re:the direction he intends to take it ... by cyberbrian · · Score: 1

      I was trying to come up with a good snarky comment like this, but shoot - you're spot on.

      Please mod this up +500, Perfect.

      B.

  7. Special Editions vs. regular by wattersa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    AP: Why not release both the originals and special editions on DVD?

    Lucas: The special edition, that's the one I wanted out there. The other movie, it's on VHS, if anybody wants it. ... I'm not going to spend the, we're talking millions of dollars here, the money and the time to refurbish that, because to me, it doesn't really exist anymore. It's like this is the movie I wanted it to be, and I'm sorry you saw half a completed film and fell in love with it. But I want it to be the way I want it to be. I'm the one who has to take responsibility for it. I'm the one who has to have everybody throw rocks at me all the time, so at least if they're going to throw rocks at me, they're going to throw rocks at me for something I love rather than something I think is not very good, or at least something I think is not finished.


    Lucas is going to have a lot of rocks thrown at him. As someone in an earlier post stated, Lucas is a control freak and doesn't seem to grasp that his vision today differs from his vision when he made the movies. :-/

    1. Re:Special Editions vs. regular by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Big deal. It's out on VHS and laserdisc.

      I really thought that those words were brave, it seemed like he didn't mind alienating the fanbase in favor of his own artistic vision.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    2. Re:Special Editions vs. regular by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Funny
      Man, George is shameless!

      I'm not going to spend the, we're talking millions of dollars here, the money and the time to refurbish that, because to me, it doesn't really exist anymore. It's like this is [the movie] I wanted it to be, and I'm sorry you saw half a completed [film] and fell in love with it. But I want it to be the way I want it to be. I'm the one who has to take responsibility for it. I'm the one who has to have everybody throw rocks at me all the time, so at least if they're going to throw rocks at me, they're going to throw rocks at me for something I love rather than something I think is not very good, or at least something I think is not finished.

      Except for 'the movie' and 'film' it's the same exact quote Michael Jackson used to defend the plastic surgery of his [face] and [nose]!

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:Special Editions vs. regular by sgant · · Score: 1

      OK...fine. Then Mr. Lucas...let ME take the original films, refurbish and get them encoded to HD and then release them to the public in DVD then HD-DVD.

      I'll throw in a percentage of the gross too. There, you won't have to spend the millions of dollars to refurbish them. All you have to do is cash the percentage check when they come in.

      Mmm-kay?

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    4. Re:Special Editions vs. regular by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Big deal. It's out on VHS and laserdisc.

      VHS has too poor quality of a medium, in my opinion. Few people want to bother owning an LD player just to watch the version they grew up with, in moderately acceptable quality.

      The SE changes might be justifiable because the technology wasn't available to do what Lucas wanted, but why change the movies again for DVD?

      How many updates are these movies going to be subjected to? If the movies were non-fiction, then there'd be accusations of revisionism. In fiction, I guess it's OK to change the story, slap 90's and 00's CG into late 70's film footage even if it looks out of place.

      I refuse to play this game, I'll stick to the pre-SE LDs.

    5. Re:Special Editions vs. regular by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hey, they don't exist for him anymore- that means his COPYRIGHT IS RELEASED on the originals! Time to take those old LDs and convert them to DVD on your own for fun and profit!

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    6. Re:Special Editions vs. regular by milkman_matt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ugh, I had respect for the guy .. well, some, but it's been steadily declining, and quickly.

      First, OK, so the technology wasn't available to make the movies he wanted to make. I'll buy that, the DS explosion was a lot cooler.. The fact that you can't see through the ships now is cool. He says he wants Han to talk to Jabba at the begining of EP I, OK, I'll buy that too, albeit poorly done. Is he saying that he didn't have the technology to allow greedo to fire first when he made the original EP IV? That's BS, he's rewriting it now as a 'big hollywood name' as opposed to creating a vision and running with it as he did in the first making of the movie.

      Also, What the hell is this "It's my movie, It's going to be how I want it, if you guys want the original it's on VHS!" attitude? He's like a spoiled kid, only he's 'rich and powerful' so he's even worse. Don't alienate the people who got you to where you are, it's poor business practice. VHS copies of Star Wars (original edition) are about 10+ years old now and probably don't even play well. Not many people (as said before) are going to buy a LD player in order to play the LD editions, and lucas knows it. He can do what he wants I guess, but it could have been said a lot better. He basically told everybody who wants the original versions of SW to f'off. He's trying to drown the original out of existence, and force people to buy the new versions even though there's a major demand for the originals. They're what made him. Now that I think about it, it surprises me that with his greed (releasing and rereleasing the same thing in a different box to make a buck) that he won't release the originals, people are asking for it, he'd make a mint off of slashdot alone ;) and he refuses to do it..

      F' him, I wouldn't buy the trilogy now even if he DID include the originals because he's already butchered it to a point where you don't know WHAT point he's trying to get across. Is it the original? second edition? third? tenth!? Seriously, this movie has been released and edited and rerelased so many f'ing times it's ridiculous. Make up your f'ing mind, take a stance and stand by it.

      I swear to god it reminds me of Spielberg's role in Goldmember...

      Austin: "That being said I do have a few suggestions"
      Lucas (pointing at his emmy): "Really? My friend here thinks it's fine just the way it is."

      Lucas has gotten too big and cocky, and his attitude is terrible. He changes these movies to make everything more of what people want (making Han a good guy from the start instead of growing a scoundrel into one through heroism) while telling people he's not going to give them what they want (an original version for the sentamentalists and hardcore fans).... Pick a friggin' side.

      -matt

    7. Re:Special Editions vs. regular by cheese_wallet · · Score: 1

      "Lucas is a control freak and doesn't seem to grasp that his vision today differs from his vision when he made the movies"

      Wow, cool, someone who actually knows George Lucas personally! When was the last time he had you over for dinner?

    8. Re:Special Editions vs. regular by DA_MAN_DA_MYTH · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Lucas (pointing at his emmy):

      It's an Oscar or Academy Award, emmy's are for television. Next, really I think it's bullshit every single one of you. If it's not one person selling out, it's another thing of neglecting the fanbase.

      Look Star Wars maybe all of ours, but it's not, it's George Lucas's, he's the artist with the vision. After awhile creating the special edition is what he wanted the original edition to be but was limited to 1970's technology. This was the work he wanted to finish. His work, not yours.

      The only parallel I can picture:

      It's like me screaming at someone's open source project after them adding or changing an API, I can't believe you made that change, you suck. Leave Lucas alone, if you don't like it, it is your right as a consumer and don't buy it.

      (By the way Han shooting first sucked, but I'm still buying the SE's on DVD)

      --
      "It takes many nails to build a crib, but one screw to fill it."
    9. Re:Special Editions vs. regular by moo083 · · Score: 1

      My sister's boyfriend is doing this (for friends and family free of charge of course). God bless technology! He works at a job with lots of movie geeks around and they're all drooling over it.

    10. Re:Special Editions vs. regular by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 1

      I saw a great South Park episode about this once...

      Lucas is an opportunistic, greedy, artless moron.

      - A.P.

      --
      "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    11. Re:Special Editions vs. regular by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Informative

      . Not many people (as said before) are going to buy a LD player in order to play the LD editions, and lucas knows it

      Why bother with LD?

      Are these available as torrents?

      [Back from a quick search]

      Yup, the original LD rips are available. :)

      *cough cough* fuck him *cough*

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    12. Re:Special Editions vs. regular by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

      I really thought that those words were brave, it seemed like he didn't mind alienating the fanbase in favor of his own pursuit of money.

    13. Re:Special Editions vs. regular by sg3000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > The fact that you can't see through the ships now is cool. He
      > says he wants Han to talk to Jabba at the begining of EP I, OK,
      > I'll buy that too, albeit poorly done.

      That footage was left on the cutting room floor for the simple reason that it didn't look the way he wanted. I'd hardly say that the rubber Jabba is intrinsically better than the CG Jabba. They both look fake. Luckily, Lucas is fixing this in the DVD version.

      > Is he saying that he didn't
      > have the technology to allow greedo to fire first when he made
      > the original EP IV? That's BS, he's rewriting it now as a 'big
      > hollywood name' as opposed to creating a vision and running
      > with it as he did in the first making of the movie.

      Greedo sounds like a make-or-break situation. The fact that people actually care about this is shows that Lucas had to make this a change.

      Lucas intended to show Han actually being threatened by Greedo. Lucas probably thought that this would be obvious by the fact that Greedo had his gun drawn and was making threatening statements. In Lucas's mind, this was self-defense, although Han's cavalier attitude towards the killing ("Sorry 'bout the mess") still fit into his pragmatic, mercenary attitude (both you and Leia seem to like a scoundrel).

      However, many people took this scene to mean that Han offed a guy who wasn't an imminent threat to him. Those people probably liked the idea, and thus they think that Lucas somehow changed Han's character by clarifying the scene.

      Lucas realized that this was clearly ambiguous to the audience. Sometimes you want ambiguity: Why did Obi Wan allow himself to be struck down? What did Shmi really mean when she said Anakin had no father? Why did Darth Vader stop Boba Fett from shooting Chewie? Why were the Ewoks so fucking ANNOYING?? ...ahem. Anyway ...

      In this case, Lucas did not want this ambiguity. He did not want people to think that Han was a murderer. So Lucas made a change to remove the ambiguity.

      The fact that so many people think that Lucas changed Han's character proves that Lucas had to make the change because people did not understand what was going on.

      Fine, if you now hate the movie and Lucas and the world because Lucas never intended Han to be a sociopath, that's fine. There are plenty of copies of Starship Troopers for you to purchase and enjoy.

      > you don't know WHAT point he's trying to get across

      Lucas hasn't made any fundamental changes to his movies. Better special effects, better music, some character clarification all go towards making his movies today what he wanted them to be back then. In fact, with Episodes I-III (presumably), he's actually clarified his message for his movies -- i.e. you can't be a serial killer and then convert on your deathbed. He says fundamentally good people can make horrible decisions, but eventually make a choice to be good again.

      But maybe his real message is, "Chill, pal. It's just a movie."

      --
      Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
    14. Re:Special Editions vs. regular by sphealey · · Score: 2, Insightful
      However, many people took this scene to mean that Han offed a guy who wasn't an imminent threat to him. Those people probably liked the idea, and thus they think that Lucas somehow changed Han's character by clarifying the scene.

      Lucas realized that this was clearly ambiguous to the audience. Sometimes you want ambiguity: Why did Obi Wan allow himself to be struck down? What did Shmi really mean when she said Anakin had no father? Why did Darth Vader stop Boba Fett from shooting Chewie? Why were the Ewoks so fucking ANNOYING?? ...ahem. Anyway ...

      In this case, Lucas did not want this ambiguity. He did not want people to think that Han was a murderer. So Lucas made a change to remove the ambiguity.

      Sigh. Except that changing Hans' character to remove the ambiguity also removes the relief and excitment when Han and Chewbacca return at the last minute to cover Luke's back in the run on the Death Star. Even though the audience should have been able to foresee that coming over 20,000 years of human dramatic art, I still remember the roar of excitment and approval when I saw it the first time.

      Now? Han is an unambigious good guy. Big whip.

      sPh

    15. Re:Special Editions vs. regular by Performaman · · Score: 0

      "VHS has too poor quality of a medium, in my opinion"
      No. That's a fact.

      --

      I have gas, but my car uses petrol.
    16. Re:Special Editions vs. regular by Ira+Sponsible · · Score: 1

      I think you're right. We've got him IN PRINT saying the originals don't exist anymore, which sounds like he's disavowing ownership of these movies. I think a good lawyer could get the originals properly put in public domain.

      --
      1.Netcraft confirms:In Soviet Russia all your base welcomes a beowolf cluster of CowboyNeal overlords. 2.? 3.Profit!!1!
    17. Re:Special Editions vs. regular by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      His work, not yours.

      For a limited time, if the framers' limitation on copyright is to be honored. It is not his forever, but he is seeking to make it so by ensuring that the VHS versions will become unwatchable before his limited monopoly on his work expires (if ever).

      I wonder if psychologically he can even acknowledge that his original versions are on laserdisc and thus the original work may well survive him and his heirs' copyright.

      (At least with an open source project you can fork the tree.)

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    18. Re:Special Editions vs. regular by Viking+Coder · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So, the phrase "the customer is always right" has no meaning?

      And on the open source project, that's when projects fork. When the creator and the users disagree so much.

      It's like the DRM being added to Windows. In the mind of Bill Gates, it's fixing a flaw in Windows. To you, me, and the other guy (some AC, probably), that really cuts back on the legitimate uses of Windows. But since there's no real alternative (for most of us), we'll all just use it and complain.

      There's no alternative. I can't buy a DVD of the originals. Lucas' claim that it would "cost millions" is nuts. First, because he couldn't have produced the special editions, without cleaning up the originals first. Second, because he knows that he would more than earn back any investment.

      He's being a selfish child. It'd be like if Monet went back and painted a cow taking a giant turd on every one of his masterpieces, and then lectured us about how this was his vision all along.

      No. The originals were one piece of art, and you can argue that the special editions are a different piece of art. The fact that he won't sell the old ones on DVD merely goes to show that he doesn't care what other people think - which, admitedly, is his right. That doesn't make it suck any less.

      Any privately owned company can decide to stop selling their product at any point, no matter how much harm is caused. Think about it, if Microsoft were private, they could literally just stop selling Windows tomorrow, and there would be nothing we could do to stop them.

      Now, sure, Star Wars isn't a OS that millions of people depend on, but I would just like to highlight the importance of things losing their copyright in a timely manner. =)

      --
      Education is the silver bullet.
    19. Re:Special Editions vs. regular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      emmy's are for television

      And apostrophes are for possessice case or contraction.

    20. Re:Special Editions vs. regular by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I hope I'm right- if so I'm going to ask your sibling poster for his brother-in-law's address so that I can send him four blank DVDs- I think that's probably enough for the entire LD series.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    21. Re:Special Editions vs. regular by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      I agree with you on the whole... Lucas certainly has the right to do annoying things, it is his movie.

      Incidently, there's nothing stopping MS from selling Windows tomorrow. It would be dumb, and the stockholders wouldn't like it, but businesses are allowed to make bad decisions.

      I _is_ possible that the stockholders could sue, but unless they can prove that MS intentionally sabotaged its own business, there's not much they can do.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    22. Re:Special Editions vs. regular by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      What's his address? Can I send him 4 DVD-Rs and have him burn me a copy?

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    23. Re:Special Editions vs. regular by Viking+Coder · · Score: 1

      The stockholders would win. If Microsoft decided to stop selling Windows, it would be intentional sabotage of their own business.

      The Linux fans would love it, but a lot of real people would be harmed.

      --
      Education is the silver bullet.
    24. Re:Special Editions vs. regular by desktop_dope · · Score: 0

      RE: your sig: "It takes many nails to build a crib, but one screw to fill it."
      Remind me not to hire you to construct children's furniture. Build a crib with nails? WTF?

      --
      ^^^^^^^ Man, those Samoans are a surly bunch.
    25. Re:Special Editions vs. regular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      > many people took this scene to mean that Han
      > offed a guy who wasn't an imminent threat to him.

      Who are these people?? It's clear that Greedo is a threat to Han. He's a bounty hunter who intends to take Han dead or alive back to Jabba for a reward, after which Jabba is going to kill him. If Han doesn't shoot first he's going to die. In fact, it doesn't make any sense for Greedo to shoot first. Greedo has his guy captured and he's gonna return him for the reward.

      So not only does the change mess with the character of Han Solo, the change itself doesn't make sense!!

    26. Re:Special Editions vs. regular by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      I'll give you and everyone else the Greedo vs Han thing. We all agree that the changes to that scene are stupid, but I say give the guy a break with the rest.

      We, I assume at least, are all pretty much computer geeks, and we look forward to the "latest and greatest" rehashes of the same old shit with software every day. I mean, damn, most of the GNU and OSS programs are "free" half featured reimplementations of decent commercial software.

      Now if you actually compare or try to compare the StarWars rereleases to any other rerelease, well there is no comparison. Some big DVD rereleases include the Godfather trilogy, which I don't own nor have I seen it yet, but I have heard that the remix of the sound into 5.1 and the picture make it seem like a newly released movie. Another is the remix of the sound in things like Pink Floyd's the Wall, and Stone's Apocalypse Now. I have not heard a single complaint about these rereleases, actually only the opposite.

      I personally liked the introduction of Jaba the Hutt in IV. I thought that was a nice tie in to the rest of the plot. I think the various scene wipes and additional critters and whatnot are great. It really fills out the movie. Also just the cleanup of the limitatations of budget and technology to make the special effects better are welcome by me as well. Lucas put quite a bit of time and money into enhancing these movies, much more than say the 20th aniversary release of Alien or Scarface, and certainly not as cheesy as what has happened to ET.

      I'm not going to rush and buy them on Tuesday, but I will buy them, and millions of people will as well. Well I guess if people keep bitching for the release of the "originals", I would guess in due time Lucas might even do it and make more $$$. I would guess that more than one person would buy both the reworked versions and the orginals so they can say they have both.

    27. Re:Special Editions vs. regular by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
      Lucas intended to show Han actually being threatened by Greedo. Lucas probably thought that this would be obvious by the fact that Greedo had his gun drawn and was making threatening statements. In Lucas's mind, this was self-defense, although Han's cavalier attitude towards the killing ("Sorry 'bout the mess") still fit into his pragmatic, mercenary attitude (both you and Leia seem to like a scoundrel). However, many people took this scene to mean that Han offed a guy who wasn't an imminent threat to him. Those people probably liked the idea, and thus they think that Lucas somehow changed Han's character by clarifying the scene.
      Many people must be total retards to not see the obvious things you state above. When I saw the "original" version, back in '77 or '78, I certainly didn't blink when Han "shot Greedo first"; I actually thought that Solo was quite a sharp character to get rid of Greedo that fast.

      In any case, it didn't make Solo a BAD character.

    28. Re:Special Editions vs. regular by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the problem is striking a compromise between what you, the artist, wants, and what the fans want. If you can't deal with that compromise, you're gonna have to deal with a loss: either of your integrity, or of the fan's respect and trust.

      Lucas keeps claiming that he's making the movie he wanted to make originally. What he's actually doing is erasing the work of the other artists who worked on Star Wars (the directors, editors, cinematographers and effects technicians) in order to make it more his. And the result is something fans don't like. Furthermore, as the copyright holder on the material, he's electing not to allow the old version to be reproduced. This is why we're upset...not because he's doing something artistic that we don't like (he maintained our respect after Howard the Friggin' Duck), but because he's doing so at the expense of the continued viability of a medium we remember. You cannot buy a legal, modern edition of the original trilogy anymore. And that's artistic genocide.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    29. Re:Special Editions vs. regular by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      Except that changing Hans' character to remove the ambiguity also removes the relief and excitment when Han and Chewbacca return at the last minute to cover Luke's back in the run on the Death Star

      Er, you forgot the most important character in that scene - the Falcon. Do you think that anyone would have cared if he'd shown up in an X-Wing or some stupid stunt like that? God, I loved that ship.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    30. Re:Special Editions vs. regular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's an Oscar or Academy Award, emmy's are for television."

      It's a pair of freakin Groucho Marx disguise glasses for all I care. Awards and their attendant shows are unmitigated festivals or corporate lameness. Awards shows are every bit as dorky the most teen-angst-ridden D&D game or pimple-ridden LAN party. The only difference is that the Awards show people are (or at least were) worth looking at naked, for the most part.

      "This was the work he wanted to finish. His work, not yours."

      Thank goodness. If it were mine I'd go back and fix it as well. The first 3 movies obviously neede more ninjas. Or rather, the SW analogue of the ninja: Boba Fett. And while I was at it I'd throw some more of those sandworms from Dune in there as well. And maybe a big-breasted woman on a pogo stick. OH WAIT. THAT WOULD BE LAME. Maybe toying with it endlessly would only create a hodge-podge of various views of the work that I had had over time. Hmmm is there a lesson to be learned here?

      "The only parallel I can picture:"

      Ugh. Don't bother. You're trying to defend someone I don't like who took something I had lost interest in and turned it into something I tried to avoid paying attention to. I'm only here to vent this weeks buildup of vitriol on you anyway.

      "(By the way Han shooting first sucked, but I'm still buying the SE's on DVD)"

      Save yourself some time and just get a subscription. I'm sure that there will be a whole new release in 2 years when Lucas decides that he should splice a monkey into the second movie.

    31. Re:Special Editions vs. regular by mikji · · Score: 1

      Would someone please mod this jackball down?

    32. Re:Special Editions vs. regular by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      Well, time will tell.... If enough people think like the parent poster and buy the new Star Wars "Special Edition" - then Lucas will be proven right.

      As far as I'm concerned, I loved the original Star Wars trilogy, and I even went to the theaters to see it again with Lucas's additions/edits made to them. But there's nothing about this new edition that makes me want to pay out the $40 or whatever it'll cost to own a copy.

      I'll grant you that the Star Wars franchise is Lucas's - not "ours", but I've also never petitioned the guy to make scripting changes or anything else to his movies, either. I do believe I have the right to comment on his work though.

      My opinion is, he got extremely LUCKY with his early movies. He used a lot of relatively unknown actors/actresses who turned out to be good picks, and apparently had some "behind the scenes" help editing his storyline too - making it more "exciting" in the theaters. Now, everything he makes strikes me as being like the new camcorder user who is fascinated by the zoom lens and special effects, and overuses them - distracting him/her from what's really important; filming good material.

      He seems to think CGI is the key to turning his previous films into much more of what he envisioned in his head - but I don't think the audiences are getting more out of the movies as a result. Maybe Lucas himself is, but only because it satisfies something personal for him.

      Again, I say "Fine, but don't expect me to buy it."

    33. Re:Special Editions vs. regular by fr2asbury · · Score: 1

      No, no, no! You're taking this all wrong. If Lucas is saying that "it doesn't really exist anymore," it can't very well be illegal to download it then can it? I mean, if it doesn't exist after all.
      Time to go watch my non-existant movies. ;-)

    34. Re:Special Editions vs. regular by PoL0 · · Score: 1

      George?? Is that you??

    35. Re:Special Editions vs. regular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, I guess I have the half-completed version...
      I'll just have to try and go on, day by day...

      Now, the Star-Belly Sneetches Had bellies with stars. The Plain-Belly Sneetches Had none upon thars.

    36. Re:Special Editions vs. regular by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      If the film was only "half completed" then I want half the money back that I've wasted on these half movies, going back to 1977 when I saw the original "Star Wars" in the theatre ten times.

    37. Re:Special Editions vs. regular by jdbo · · Score: 1

      > It's like me screaming at someone's open source project > after them adding or changing an API

      if Star Wars was software it'd be a program re-released every few years with minor patches (with minor, but distinctly noticeable changes in functionality/look-and-feel).

      And it'd by no means be an OSS project, the public has only ever had access to the "binary releases" of the Star Wars "program".

      Think harder about your metaphors, please. You broke this one badly.

    38. Re:Special Editions vs. regular by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      You know, I have been cutting Lucas a break on the SE movies. I didn't think they were so bad actually, the THX remastering is cool, the cleanup on the visuals was cool.. It was the rewriting that I didn't like. You mention Apocolypse Redux, which has about 45 min of additional footage.. Which brings up a good point. "Stone did it and you don't give him hell, cut Lucas a break" Which, to that all I can say is "good point, you caught me".. However, they didn't really add anything to Redux that wasn't in the original cut of the film, it's all stuff that was stripped out to satisfy the studio's want to have it play more times per day in the theaters. But you're right, there are a lot of remakes, and they've all been pretty good. It just seems like Lucas half-assed a couple scenes. For instance Greedo vs. Han and Han's discussion with Jabba which did enhance the story, but could have been done better. It just looked rushed to me.

      Anyhow, I normally look forward to SE movies with added footage, I couldn't wait for Redux, the only LOTR movies I get are the extended versions, I love seeing the film how it was intended. But usually these 'remakes' are just adding stuff from the cutting room floor, back into the movie. Lucas seems to have changed his whole life view, and it shows in his movies. He's adding new footage to satisfy the parents it seems, or to push merchandising.. which god knows SW doesn't need any help with that.

      That's just my stance on that. What really pissed me off in the article was the fact that he basically told everyone who wants the original edition to F'off. How hard would it be to take the SE versions of SW, cut out the added footage, and end up with a digitally remastered, THX edition of the ORIGINAL cut of SW. Piece of cake. And he can even put it on the SE discs as a bonus. I'd buy it. I just don't appreciate his attitude of "I don't want anyone to see those, if you want it, go find it on VHS" He sure didn't have that "I don't want anyone to see those" attitude when he was making millions off of it in the 70s. I thought that was a bit uncalled for.

      -matt

    39. Re:Special Editions vs. regular by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      That's right, an Oscar, I don't know my awards ;)

      Anyhow, I just thought it was in poor taste to basically tell his entire audience to piss off. I think most would agree that it could have been put better than "If you want it, go get it on VHS". A decaying medium which is a lot harder to find than the DVD, and it's even hard to find the non-SE versions on VHS these days anyway. So even if you do go get it on VHS, you're probably still getting SE.

      Before SE was created, there WAS a "Digitally Remastered" version of SW Trilogy released on VHS, why can't he just use that and put it on DVD? Anyhow, I'm digressing, the point of this post was that I didn't like his response, it seemed like he was being a cocky prick. And -that- is why I wasn't happy with the story on Friday, even if I did drift into a rant on his need to release the original movie or my opinions on the changes made in SE ;)

      -matt

  8. To SW fans, from Lucas. by Kenja · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "F-ck you all, I never wanted to make star wars in the first place. The special additions are as close as I can now get to what I realy wanted. I wont release the originals because the millions of fans that want to buy them wouldn't (or so the force tells me). Just buy my crap and shut the hell up."

    While the above is paraphrased, its more or less whats in the interview.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:To SW fans, from Lucas. by deathcloset · · Score: 4, Insightful

      there is no formula for success, but there is one for failure: try to please everyone.

    2. Re:To SW fans, from Lucas. by darien · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wont release the originals because the millions of fans that want to buy them wouldn't (or so the force tells me).

      That's not what he says at all. He says he won't release the originals because "I'm not going to spend the ... money and the time to refurbish that, because to me, it doesn't really exist anymore. It's like this is the movie I wanted it to be, and I'm sorry you saw half a completed film and fell in love with it."

      I have to say, "half a completed film" is a rather misleading way of describing Star Wars - the film was perfectly complete as it stood, and the later additions are mostly pretty brief and insignificant. But still, he's not saying people wouldn't buy the original versions - he's saying almost the opposite. He won't release them because people would buy them in preference to his preferred versions.

    3. Re:To SW fans, from Lucas. by Trigun · · Score: 3, Insightful

      To me it looks like George isn't trying to please everyone, he is merely pleasuring himself. Repeatedly and furiously

      The fact that the original Star Wars fans feel fucked is inconsequential.

    4. Re:To SW fans, from Lucas. by Trigun · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the fact that he went through all the trouble to redo the movie for the THX release. Digitize that one, goddamn it! It's done!

      The shit he pulled with the ending of Jedi shouldn't even make the fucking blooper reel. Yet he's talking about wasting money?

      Fuck him. Fuck him in the ass. Petition your congressmen to release his movies into the public domain. Just dont' fucking buy this version.

      And, as an aside, I'll bet you dollars to donuts that the original versions will make it to DVD (at least the THX release) and this is just a big fucking stunt to whip us up into a fury so we'll buy both.

      Again, I say 'Fuck'im!'

    5. Re:To SW fans, from Lucas. by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      "F-ck you all, I never wanted to make star wars in the first place. The special additions are as close as I can now get to what I realy wanted. I wont release the originals because the millions of fans that want to buy them wouldn't (or so the force tells me). Just buy my crap and shut the hell up."

      Well put, I got the feeling those were the exact words he was looking for, and would have used in private had he been assured his statement wouldn't go public ;)

      -matt

    6. Re:To SW fans, from Lucas. by nutrock69 · · Score: 1

      - And, as an aside, I'll bet you dollars to donuts that the original versions will make it to DVD (at least the THX release) and this is just a big fucking stunt to whip us up into a fury so we'll buy both.

      Of course he will. He's already done this too many times to be believable whenever he says anything like: "I won't release it!". He gets us to buy what he does put out, then when he's sure he's milked it for all it is worth, he releases what we wanted in the first place. Every Laserdisc fan knows this...

      (early 90's) "You have to buy a 9 disc set to get the remastered movies because we're not releasing them seperately." (2 years later) "Look, seperate movies are available! Remastered! Again! Doubly Remastered! Look - Shiny object!"

      (late 90's) "Special editions are not being released on laser." (9 months later, after buying WS vhs) "Oops, I lied. My bad. Here they are!"

      Speaking of laserdiscs - it's nice of him to let us know that the original versions are still out there on laser... good luck trying to find them, they've been out of print for 7 or 8 years - but he knows this since he's the one who made the decision just before releasing the Special editions.

      Hell, the dvd release on tuesday was supposed to be "around 2006 or 2007" so he could release them all as a 6 movie set. He's timing this one so that we all stay mindful of him getting ready for Episode 3 next May. I bet he'll change the movies again for the 6 movie release, then 2 years later he'll give us a version with the originals and all 3 generations since (like Terminator 2 did) in a special package - all so we'll have to buy it 3 times in the process of getting the one version we want.

    7. Re:To SW fans, from Lucas. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Speaking of laserdiscs - it's nice of him to let us know that the original versions are still out there on laser... good luck trying to find them, they've been out of print for 7 or 8 years - but he knows this since he's the one who made the decision just before releasing the Special editions.


      If you hunt around on the net diligently enough, you can find that some brave souls have created DVD images from the LDs of the original series.

    8. Re:To SW fans, from Lucas. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      he is merely pleasuring himself. Repeatedly and furiously

      This is great... Your comment just made my top mental image for the day. Poor ol Georgey, stuck out there on Skywanker, um WALKer Ranch, sweating up a storm.

    9. Re:To SW fans, from Lucas. by calethix · · Score: 1

      "the dvd release on tuesday was supposed to be "around 2006 or 2007" so he could release them all as a 6 movie set. He's timing this one so that we all stay mindful of him getting ready for Episode 3 next May"

      I thought it was pretty clear from the interview that he decided he could make more money by releasing them now because in 2006/2007, piracy may be so rampant that no one would want to buy his crappy versions.

    10. Re:To SW fans, from Lucas. by nutrock69 · · Score: 1

      True - that is what he said in the interview. But since when do we actually believe what he says in interviews? He's been lying about releases since the 80's. Blatently and often.

      As for these dvd's, he started working on them in secret (according to rumored reports) about two years ago - roughly the same time he told us to wait until 2006/7 and well before the widespead proliferation of high-speed internet and the ability to download an entire DVD quickly. He could not possibly have had the idea back then that piracy would be so rampant 4-5 years down the road, his vision isn't that good... :) One corner of his mouth was telling the fans that it wasn't going to happen, and the other corner was telling his technogeek squad to plan for "just before the episode 3 marketing campaign". In the middle was what little was left of his brain and it was busy typing out dollar sign$ across his eyeballs - thinking he can pull another fast one getting more money out of our pockets. Again.

      With the fans clamoring for a release he knows that the millions it will cost to restore the film will be made up in the first week's sales alone. And telling us that the original editions will never be released is most likely just like all the other times he said the word "never": hoping to catch those of us who believe him and will buy them tuesday so he can make us buy it again later on when he "changes his mind" yet again.

    11. Re:To SW fans, from Lucas. by nutrock69 · · Score: 1

      - If you hunt around on the net diligently enough, you can find that some brave souls have created DVD images from the LDs of the original series.

      Yes - I have them. :) I give props to whoever did them in thanks.

    12. Re:To SW fans, from Lucas. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a formula for success. Give people what they want.
      The hard part is figuring out what they want.

    13. Re:To SW fans, from Lucas. by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      While we're trading aphorisms, there's another formula for failure: don't do anything anybody could possibly like, and every time you find something somebody likes, destroy it in a conspicuous display of contempt for their perception of your art.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
  9. Article in Brief - Luca$ Direction by dbretton · · Score: 5, Funny

    Q: Where are you taking Star Wars?
    A: Straight to the bank!

    1. Re:Article in Brief - Luca$ Direction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's how you read it?

      All I saw was Lucus saying, "I'm the man! I'm the man! I'm the man! Me. Me. Me!"

      The guy has one hell of a huge ego. It's clear he didn't learn a thing from making such sucky movies and still thinks he's god's gift to movie making. I don't think there will be another good Star Wars movie until after he dies.

    2. Re:Article in Brief - Luca$ Direction by Danathar · · Score: 1

      From Robocop:

      "I'll buy that for a dollar!"

    3. Re:Article in Brief - Luca$ Direction by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      * It's clear he didn't learn a thing from making such sucky movies*

      according to *his* rules they didn't suck.
      brought in plenty of money.

      i'm just surprised he hasn't taken a page from lotr book and made extended editions yet.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:Article in Brief - Luca$ Direction by UncleBiggims · · Score: 1

      OK... somebody please explain this to me. So many people are upset and claiming that Lucas is only out for our money. Are these same people mindlessly buying the DVDs? Against their own free will are they giving Lucas their money? If not, then Lucas will fail in his attempt to "take Star Wars to the bank."

      Second, these very same people (whether they will buy the new set or not) are really just mad that they can't buy the original... which would help Lucas SUCEED in "taking Star Wars to the bank."

      Seems a bit ironic to me.

    5. Re:Article in Brief - Luca$ Direction by Pidder · · Score: 1

      From Hard To Kill: I'll take you to the bank! The Blood Bank!

    6. Re:Article in Brief - Luca$ Direction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Let's put it in terms you can understand. People hate spam, but those same people don't buy spam advertised products. But you know something? Spam is still around. Imagine that!

      See? It's possible that people can hate something and it still works enough to do it.

      Also, keep in mind that the opinions of Slashdot do not reflect the entire purchasing community Lucas is looking to buy his schwag.

    7. Re:Article in Brief - Luca$ Direction by UncleBiggims · · Score: 1

      I understand that. My point was that if they DO buy the new DVDs then they are contributing to a self-fulfilling prophesy; calling him greedy then giving him money. Secondly, assuming they are not going to buy the new set, they DO want to buy the originals. Again a self-fulfilling prophesy.

  10. Direction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    They also discuss the future of the franchise and the direction he intends to take it.
    "I've been down so goddamned long,
    It all looks up to me."

    -- The Doors

  11. George Lucas by boschmorden · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ...insert obligitory anti-Lucas, anti-SW, "raping" of our childhoods comment.....

  12. ironic hilarity by boarder · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here is a story on IMDb about Lucas and his thoughts on Hollywood:
    post at IMDb

    Choice quote from the master of looks over substance: (Hollywood is) "making hugely inefficient movies for great amounts of money and they aren't creatively very interesting."

    I wonder if the people who say one thing and do another (like Lucas and the Douchebag of Liberty, Robert Novak) realize they are doing it or if they truly think they are special and doing the right thing.

    --
    IANAL, but I play one on /.
    1. Re:ironic hilarity by MrBlackBand · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I wonder if the people who say one thing and do another ... realize they are doing it or if they truly think they are special and doing the right thing.

      Remember, unlike in the movies no one ever thinks that they are evil. Everyone (Caesar, Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot, Pinochet, etc.) thinks that they are doing the right thing and anyone who opposes them is evil. Not that I think George Lucas is evil, of course.

      --
      "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it."
  13. Juicy and stupid quote by Gogl · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "Lucas: The special edition, that's the one I wanted out there. The other movie, it's on VHS, if anybody wants it. ... I'm not going to spend the, we're talking millions of dollars here, the money and the time to refurbish that, because to me, it doesn't really exist anymore. It's like this is the movie I wanted it to be, and I'm sorry you saw half a completed film and fell in love with it. But I want it to be the way I want it to be. I'm the one who has to take responsibility for it. I'm the one who has to have everybody throw rocks at me all the time, so at least if they're going to throw rocks at me, they're going to throw rocks at me for something I love rather than something I think is not very good, or at least something I think is not finished."

    Yeah. Suuuure. You're an artiste, and you must complete your work! That must be it. Nevermind that to most artists, integrity means keeping their original work untainted. And nevermind how your tweaks and changes, well, are largely either stupid glitz or just plain stupid. Han shoots first, damnit.

    Please please please, don't reward Lucas's shenanigans by buying the DVDs.

    1. Re:Juicy and stupid quote by Six+Nines · · Score: 1

      I just want Lucas to fix the scene in Ep. IV where Luke jumps out of the X-fighter's cockpit and yells "CARRIE!!!" Still get a kick out of that, I do...

    2. Re:Juicy and stupid quote by CodeWanker · · Score: 1

      I think THIS is the best quote: "Well, OK, that's that genre, and I'll find a really talented person to take it and create it."

      If only he'd done that with episodes I,II,III, and VI...

      --


      "Wow. Now THAT'S a lot of angry Indians." - Lt. Col. George Armstrong Custer
    3. Re:Juicy and stupid quote by dykofone · · Score: 1
      Obviously what this shows is that Lucas is only good at making half-finished movies. By that logic, if we could just find a way to make sure Episode III never gets finished, it's bound to be a lot better than if it does get finished!

      Why, this proves what many of you have been saying for a while, that the newer movies would have been better off never being made!

    4. Re:Juicy and stupid quote by gamble · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't be silly, there are plenty of famous artists who are unhappy with pieces and continue to work them over until they are happy with them. Picasso did this plenty of times, reformatting a piece painting over large sections with new work. In general, this is something that critic/historians get very excited about. It's a chance to see the artist's mind at work -- to see the thought process. Musicians do this all the time as well, most music fans would say "If it sounds the same live, then the band lacks musicianship."

      Alright, that said, movies are an artform where the artist cannot afford to sit on the project until it's finished. It would certainly seem odd if Michalangelo decided recently to amend David, saying "I never liked this hair. It's got an odd wave to it from this one particular angle."

      Anyway, I don't want Lucas directly compared to Michalangelo, it just seems unfair to blanketly define artist integrity and artist idiological desire as such.

    5. Re:Juicy and stupid quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually being an artist (among millions of good and bad defenitions) means owning the idea and doing with it whatever you please - with no changes from others.

      Control freak? DAMN STRAIGHT.

      As a commercial artist - I'm paid - and part of my job - is making changes for the client. As a professional - I'm all happy to make the revisions and cash the checks. I'll defend/justify my creative decisions anytime, or at least explain/clarify them - but the customer gets the final say. That's the deal.

      Personal art? I'll make changes any damn way I see fit, when I want, for any damn reason.

      You're a fan - not a client. Please stay behind the line or (here's a swell idea) - MAKE your OWN ART!

      It's quite fun actually, and if people reward your efforts with praise or enough scratch to do it for a living - even better!

    6. Re:Juicy and stupid quote by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1


      So Lucas WANTED Greedo to shoot first in the original release? What, did one of the editors undermine him and cut the scene wrong, and he didn't notice until decades later?

    7. Re:Juicy and stupid quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is EXACTLY the reason that I don't believe him at all. Thank you for pointing it out.

    8. Re:Juicy and stupid quote by falcon5768 · · Score: 1

      THANK YOU exactly what I was going to say... A lot of artists ammend their work later, dont go saying that they dont... the idea that they dont is a new thing

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    9. Re:Juicy and stupid quote by zombiestomper · · Score: 1

      On the topic of Han and Greedo:

      Has he ever addressed why he changed it?

      It's not like the technology to make Greedo shoot first didn't exist at the time of the originals?

      Ah, fuck it. I'm sure once the DVD's are out, someone will edit it back to the Original Gangsta Version soon enough.

    10. Re:Juicy and stupid quote by Private+Public · · Score: 1

      When restoring the last supper by da Vinci they didn't draw in Jar Jar Binks and say, "I made it better."

    11. Re:Juicy and stupid quote by shotgunefx · · Score: 1

      You could argue to a point that the viewing public is the client. We didn't look at the thing in a fucking gallery. We all paid money to see it.
      But your right he is the owner, and he is a dick. He should have some consideration for the people who put him where he is.

      --

      -William Shatner can be neither created nor destroyed.
    12. Re:Juicy and stupid quote by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 1

      Han shoots first, damnit.

      Amdn, and boy howdy.

      What's next? Han reproving Luke and Leia for not showing "compassion and understanding" for the imperials and DV? Will Han get in touch with his feminine side and start wearing pastels? Maybe he could dump those evil blasters and carry microwave popcorn or puppy food in his holsters...

      Han's not only a scoundrel, but he's a smart guy, and in the rough world he lives in, you better know when to shoot first, or you die. Anything else is just STOOPID. Greedo was going to shoot; Han was smart enough not to let him.

      I guess next Lucas will start making the authors of all the books rewrite them to make Han a nicer guy.

    13. Re:Juicy and stupid quote by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      Ahhh, very well put. That's the point I was trying to make (before I drifted into a 4 paragraph rant ;) )

      Thanks!

      -matt

  14. Talking about others' take on the SW universe by Tebriel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Some of it "might be good" George?

    Some of it is DAMN good and much better than anything you'd ever come up with. Come on, George, give credit to people who've already taken your universe and made it better.

    --
    The Blaster Master Fighting for Truth, Justice, and Evil Pie since 1979
    1. Re:Talking about others' take on the SW universe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? They can't be better than Jar-Jar! :-)

    2. Re:Talking about others' take on the SW universe by irhtfp · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yes, I agree. Much better. The Zahn books in particular are quite good IMO. Maybe Lucas ought to turn over the franchise to him and let him make some feature films. (Yes, I know, icicles on Beelzebub's nose and all that.)

      Screw the final three episodes that Lucas imagined. Let a new writer (an actual sci-fi writer) give us some offshoot films. It's a huge universe. It's a cool universe.

      There's a million stories in the naked streets of Coruscant...

      --
      I've made up my mind and now I've got to lie in it.
  15. Extra-Special Director's Cut III by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 1

    Yeah, how many times has this movie going to be changed? Pesonally I'd like to see it as I did when I was a 9 year old back in 78! Personally I can't stand the overuse of CGI in everything from LOTR (although that is the least offending of them since it's a fantasy type deal) to today's Hero movie. Especially bad was that Rock movie (only saw the ad for that) and the Brad Pitt disaster, Troy (again, the ad told me the 1,000,000 CGI soldiers would ruin the 'third wall' feeling of the movie).

    Call me old school if you must, but if you're going to change/add to a movie upon re-re-re-release, please package adn title it as so

    CB --- ---- ---- >

    1. Re:Extra-Special Director's Cut III by Reziac · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A little OT, but Troy surprised the hell out of me by being a very good movie that focuses on the personal interactions that caused the events depicted. And its CGI (despite taking a correctly back seat to the very well-managed plot and character development) is probably the most seamless I've seen to date. If you take it as historical fantasy, and don't expect a literal retelling of The Iliad, you'll like it. If you want The Iliad pristine and correct, read Homer. :)

      That said, I want the original Star Wars back, the first release from 1977 without any mucking with the plotline, the visuals, or the soundtrack (which was pretty well fucked up by the re-release in 1978 -- if you didn't see it 1977, you've never heard the original soundtrack). I'm not interested in CGI "updates". I don't care if there's a tennis shoe and a potato floating in deep space. I'm not shocked that one of the Good Guys[tm] shoots first. But I *don't* want the flow of the movie interrupted by George's notions of how to "perfect" it.

      Bah, sometimes people get things right the first time and just don't realise it. As Orson Scott Card said (and proceeds to violate regularly himself), the most important part of writing is knowing when to STOP.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    2. Re:Extra-Special Director's Cut III by valkraider · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is always nice when people criticize movies they have not even seen. Kind of like people commenting on articles they have not even read.

    3. Re:Extra-Special Director's Cut III by Relyx · · Score: 1

      What exactly do you mean by "'third wall' feeling of the movie"? Did you actually see Troy?

      In the end, CGI is simply a tool. The reason they used computers to generate the crowds was because of economic and logistical necessity.

    4. Re:Extra-Special Director's Cut III by dosius · · Score: 2, Interesting

      From what I've heard, MagnoliaFan (he of "Balance of the Force") is working on restoring the 1977 version against the best possible video sources. This I've got to see.

      Moll.

      --
      What you hear in the ear, preach from the rooftop Matthew 10.27b
    5. Re:Extra-Special Director's Cut III by Kehvarl · · Score: 1

      I hold firm to my right and privilege to post without proofreading, without previewing, without reading the article, and without properly reading or understandinn the posts to which I reply

    6. Re:Extra-Special Director's Cut III by arose · · Score: 1

      Please remind me, what are trailers for?

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    7. Re:Extra-Special Director's Cut III by Ira+Sponsible · · Score: 1

      You must be new here.

      --
      1.Netcraft confirms:In Soviet Russia all your base welcomes a beowolf cluster of CowboyNeal overlords. 2.? 3.Profit!!1!
    8. Re:Extra-Special Director's Cut III by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I don't know this person (having fallen out of SW fandom some while back) but that'd be the one *I* want to see too. And hopefully he'll get the soundtrack right too!

      Somewhere around here I have a bootleg audio tape from June 1977, tho by now it's pretty scratchy.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  16. Trilogy Changes by MikeMacK · · Score: 2, Informative
    George Lucas Speaks on Trilogy Changes

    Actually, I don't think he mentions any changes to the trilogy, other than they are the Special Edition versions.

    1. Re:Trilogy Changes by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Informative
      Actually, I don't think he mentions any changes to the trilogy, other than they are the Special Edition versions.

      in the 90's they added a sequence of Han Solo talking to Jaba the Hutt at the space port. Jaba was added through computer animation, but the live shot of Harrison Ford was from the original filming. Upon reflection it added nothing to the story or the film that wasn't already apparently clear.

      Not seeing Jaba gave the impression of something menacing. The CG Jaba looked small and rendered on a sheet of Saran Wrap which seemed to shift in the breeze and looked terrible.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Trilogy Changes by MikeMacK · · Score: 1

      Right, I know the scene, it's part of the Special Edition version of "A New Hope". I thought there would be OTHER changes for the DVD versions and that that was what he would be discussing? I guess you would call them the DVD Special "Special Editions". Maybe I'm just "having a bad feeling about this." :-)

    3. Re:Trilogy Changes by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      Supposedly there are additional changes from the Special Edition version. The most talked about one is the replacement of the actor who played Anakin in Return of the Jedi with Hayden Christensen (Anakin from episodes 2 and 3).

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
  17. Ahh the view from the high horse... by j1bb3rj4bb3r · · Score: 0

    They all think outside the box, but they all have very strong ideas about what should happen, and they think it should be their way. Which is fine, except I'm making the movies, so I should have it my way.

    He wouldn't have been saying this years ago when he was struggling, and he needed fans. Now that he doesn't, he has carte blanche to go ahead and f*ck with it however he wants. What he doesn't realize is that it's bigger than he is now, and that's because of the fan base. It's culture, and history will judge him harshly for his selfish ways.

    --
    *yawn*
    1. Re:Ahh the view from the high horse... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Some day I hope Kevin Smith gets this rich and famous- I'd love to see the 6 hour version of Dogma with all of the philosophical discussion in it. (the DVD gave a taste- but it would be nice to see the original script done).

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  18. Coming soon! Star Wars SE directors cut PLATINUM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jar Jar shoots first!

  19. Re:Anybody cares? by deathcloset · · Score: 5, Funny

    "I care" - Luke

  20. George Lucas is teh suck by kad77 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    'nuff said.

    (THX 11-whatever anyone?)

    1. Re:George Lucas is teh suck by kad77 · · Score: 1

      Off-topic my arse, that was an inspired bit of social commentary that succinctly captured the general tone of the slashdot audience's reaction to GL's insidiously selfish and cold-hearted decision to only promote edits of mediocre work rather than just accepting what is, rather than attempting to rewrite history for his own ends. And I cited a previous attempt at the same thing.
      Also, I can't help using run-on sentences, so I factor!

  21. Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    My response to Lucas is a quote from the Foreward of "Brave New World", by Aldous Huxley, in regard to "changing things" after the fact.
    Chronic remorse, as all the moralists are agreed, is a most undesirable sentiment. If you have behaved badly, repent, make what amends you can and address yourself to the task of behaving better next time. On no account brood over your wrongdoing. Rolling in the muck is not the best way of getting clean.

    Art also has its morality, and many of the rules of this morality are the same as, or at least analogous to, the rules of ordinary ethics. Remorse, for example, is as undesirable in relation to our bad art as it is in relation to our bad behavior. The badness should be hunted out, acknowledged and, if possible, avoided in the future. To pore over the literary shortcomings of twenty years ago, to attempt to patch a faulty work into the perfection it missed at its first execution, to spend one's middle age in trying to mend the artistic sins committed and bequeathed by that different person who was oneself in youth-all this is surely vain and futile. And that is why this new Brave New World is the same as the old one. Its defects as a work of art are considerable; but in order to correct them I should have to rewrite the book-and in the process of rewriting, as an older, other person, I should probably get rid not only of some of the faults of the story, but also of such merits as it originally possessed. And so, resisting the temptation to wallow in artistic remorse, I prefer to leave both well and ill alone and to think about something else.
    Leave it alone, Lucas.
    1. Re:Response by Blue+Stone · · Score: 1

      Jesus, somebody send Lucas that book with that passage highlighted.

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    2. Re:Response by Paolomania · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I absolutely agree. "Star Wars" was not a success because people liked Lucas, Lucas was a success because people liked "Star Wars". Audiences responded to the actual movie that was released, not to the ideas that George had in his head. Assuming that audiences liking a movie is the ultimate measure of how good a movie is, who is George to say that his new version is "better" than the one that people actually loved. All he is doing is asserting that "better" means that HE thinks its better - which IMO is a bit self-centered and not at all a good measure to go by.

      IMO this is also where the Wachowski Bros. went wrong: they assumed that it was the creative vision behind their movie that people loved, and not the movie itself. So by that assumption, producing two movies that adhere to their creative whims will result in movies that people love - which is evidently false.

    3. Re:Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude...no. We don't want to Lucas to feel he has reason to compare himself to Huxley.

      The resulting near-instantaneous expansion of his already considerable (and undeserved) ego would result in an explosion of cataclysmic proportions.

      Many innocent lives would be lost.

    4. Re:Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. 'Nuff said.

    5. Re:Response by scaaven · · Score: 0, Redundant
      Audiences responded to the actual movie that was released, not to the ideas that George had in his head.

      Right, the movie manifested into existence all by itself. I can't wait to become rich and famous when a blockbuster movie lands right in my lap.

      --
      I know I'm going to be modded up on this
    6. Re:Response by CoolToddHunter · · Score: 1

      However, Lucas said that the vision in his head is not what went into the actual movie (something like 20-30% he said). So people responded to what was actually made and not what he would consider a "complete" movie.

    7. Re:Response by Boronx · · Score: 1

      I've noticed that an artists favorite work is rarely what is considered his or her best work. Artists are generally in love with the idea they had in their head when they were creating, but fans grow to love a work because of the ideas and emotions that flow through it, quite often without the artist's knowing. A piece connects with something inside each individiual audience member, and it's hardly surprising that the artists don't have a firm grasp as to how that works. If they try to rationalize it, they'll likely screw up whatever it was that was working.

  22. An artist's work is never done? by kmb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't recall any stories about Picasso sneaking into museums with a paintbrush to touch up his old work....

    1. Re:An artist's work is never done? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Subsequently, Pablo Picasso was never called an asshole.

    2. Re:An artist's work is never done? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think any of Picasso's paintings were in museums while he was alive.

    3. Re:An artist's work is never done? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, not in New York.

    4. Re:An artist's work is never done? by mblase · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't recall any stories about Picasso sneaking into museums with a paintbrush to touch up his old work....

      No, but I do recall an article recently about how Edvard Munch's The Scream actually exists as six or eight different, broadly identical paintings, all of which are by his hand. Or how George Seurat made changes to Sunday on the Island of La Grand Jatte, most noticably adding the pointillist frame around the canvas, long after he'd completed the actual work. Or how Renaissance painters routinely created multiple copies of their works on demand, and they were often created by students of the original artist's studio but signed by the artist himself.

      The statement "An artist's work is never done" is even more true in the world of painting than in most other media, historically speaking.

    5. Re:An artist's work is never done? by scorpionsoft · · Score: 1

      No, perhaps not, but one of my favorite Art History professors used to tell stories about how, when George Braque and Picasso painted together in Paris that they would take each others canvases and hide them when *they* thought the other's painting was done! The other would protest, but that's what friends are for, I guess.

    6. Re:An artist's work is never done? by dapyx · · Score: 0
      Yes, they were in museums by the time of his death in 1973.

      Picasso was one of the few painters that were famous during their lives.

      --
      I'm sorry, the number you have dialed is an imaginary number. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and dial again.
    7. Re:An artist's work is never done? by Gudlyf · · Score: 2
      Point well taken, although my first thought was that if 'Star Wars' isn't what Lucas wanted when it was complete, why didn't he do what Edvard Munch did with his painting and just create another movie?

      Does me mean to tell us that his vision of a great 'Star Wars' still involves B-rate actor Mark Hamill? If he has so much faith in his "true" vision, why not put his money where is mouth is and create it from scratch? See what fans like more then. Oh that's right, he doesn't care.

      Although Lucas most likey already puts his money where his mouth is if he carries his wallet in his back pocket.

      --
      Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
    8. Re:An artist's work is never done? by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

      Film revisionism is new at all.

      Back in the days when movies didn't open nationwide (let alone worldwide) Kubrick showed different cuts of 2001 a space odyssey in new york and los angeles.

    9. Re:An artist's work is never done? by sg3000 · · Score: 1

      > I don't recall any stories about Picasso sneaking into museums
      > with a paintbrush to touch up his old work

      Picasso actually painted over a previous painting to create his "Rue de Montmartre". the previous painting had a theme similar to his "Le Moulin de la Galette" painting. Salon has more details here:

      > On Sept. 14, the show "A Hidden Picasso" opens for a two-
      > month exhibition at the Guggenheim Bilbao, in Bilbao, Spain.
      > There on display (thanks to digital technology) will be a full-
      > color version of a painting that Picasso made in 1900, and
      > discarded. He then reused the canvas, painting atop it the
      > famous "Rue de Montmartre."

      No word if any of the paintings contained a CG Jabba the Hutt.

      --
      Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
    10. Re:An artist's work is never done? by Tony+Freakin+Twist · · Score: 1

      even thought there exist several versions of the scream, all are available for public view.

    11. Re:An artist's work is never done? by kmb · · Score: 1

      *sigh* I know, I know. I was aiming for the whole "brevity is the soul of wit" thing.

      Almost all artists are revisionists to some degree. Many painters recycled canvases. Georgia O'Keeffe burned most of her early work at one point. But once a piece is in the wild, it becomes part of the public consciousness. (The extent depends on how many people notice the piece and develop an emotional connection with it, obviously.)

      I just can't understand the mentality that prevents the man from accepting that these films have taken on a life of their own, and that any regrets or unfulfilled wishes he has with respect to them would more productively and more maturely be addressed by taking what he has learned and trying to create something entirely new with it.

      Hindsight is, unfortunately, NOT always 20/20.

      P.S. I specifically chose Picasso because he was a painter who had enough success is his relatively long life to have his work shown in major galleries and museums during his life.

      P.P.S. I also use the word "artist" rather liberally when referring to Lucas....

    12. Re:An artist's work is never done? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      The statement "An artist's work is never done" is even more true in the world of painting than in most other media, historically speaking.


      How so? Munch made six different paintings of The Scream, he didn't paint The Scream over the same canvas six times in the period of 30 years. If Lucas released multiple versions of a Star Wars movie, that would be fine. In fact, that'd be great because it would give us different examples for us to interpret his vision. But he's obstinately sticking to the idea that his current interpretation is better than his original work. In the world of art and in film, that's generally a terrible mistake and is very much frowned upon. Typically when an artist retouches their work decades later, it will be denoted and people will consider it an imperfection. Imagine if any of the great masterworks were unveiled and then changed - it would be a travesty. Da Vinci decides to add a toothsome grin and a brighter dress on Mona Lisa because he originally wanted to but a good pearlescent white paint wasn't around at the time.
    13. Re:An artist's work is never done? by mblase · · Score: 1

      if 'Star Wars' isn't what Lucas wanted when it was complete, why didn't he do what Edvard Munch did with his painting and just create another movie?

      Um, he did. It's called "Star Wars Special Edition" (etc.) to distinguish it from "Star Wars" (etc.). He then released it a couple of decades later and clearly distinguished it in all the marketing materials.

    14. Re:An artist's work is never done? by Gudlyf · · Score: 1
      I said "create another movie", as in from scratch...as Edvard Munch did. Not take bits and pieces from the original footage and add/tweak crap.

      BAH why do I waste my time replying anymore...

      --
      Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
    15. Re:An artist's work is never done? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      there exist several versions of the scream, all are available for public view.
      Except for the one stolen last month.
  23. Oh boy, here it comes... by DroopyStonx · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Tons of complaints about "Lucas needs a new Yacht" and "he's gonna fuck up/he has fucked up Star Wars"... ...only to have them immediately turn around and buy the damn product.

    --
    We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
    1. Re:Oh boy, here it comes... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Has it ever occurred to you that maybe the people who are complaining are not the ones buying the product? There's a lot of different people on Slashdot you know, and they don't all think alike.

    2. Re:Oh boy, here it comes... by sulli · · Score: 0
      they don't all think alike.

      Yes we do.

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
    3. Re:Oh boy, here it comes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and they WILL buy the dvds, don't worry.

    4. Re:Oh boy, here it comes... by DroopyStonx · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's usually the die hard fans who complain the most.

      This is true for pretty much anything... especially music (i.e. Metallica used to be cool, they sold out. Excuse me while I buy their new CD.)

      --
      We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
    5. Re:Oh boy, here it comes... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      This is true for pretty much anything... especially music (i.e. Metallica used to be cool, they sold out. Excuse me while I buy their new CD.)

      This is interesting; I just made another comment in this thread, before reading yours, and I brought up Metallica selling out as well.

      However, like other true die-hard fans, I haven't bought anything they made after the black album. As far as I'm concerned, that was their last album. Anyone who actually buys the new stuff isn't a true die-hard fan. Yes, a lot of people have bought their new stuff, but they're not the same fans. The new fans probably don't even like their old albums.

  24. Re:Coming soon! Star Wars SE directors cut PLATINU by pklong · · Score: 3, Funny

    Coming soon in a fan created verson, Jar Jar gets shot first.

    --

    Philip

    Signatures are broken

  25. Re:Anybody cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope. Don't care.

    But I will say this before some other nerd decides to point it out: it has had an impact on my life, however small. Specifically, being robbed of several hours of my life by watching the first three shitty flicks in theatres several years ago.

  26. Even worse: by Megaweapon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Admiral Ackbar: "Luke, I am your mother!"

    Luke: "AAAAAAHHHHHH!!!!!"

    --
    I'm sure "SlashdotMedia" will improve on all the wonders that Dice Holdings blessed us all with
    1. Re:Even worse: by Zorilla · · Score: 4, Funny

      Admiral Ackbar: "It's not really a trap!"

      That one would be sure to piss off some fark.com photoshoppers.

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    2. Re:Even worse: by MikeMacK · · Score: 2, Funny
      No, the best would have been:

      Darth Vader: Luke, I am your mother!

      Luke: Nooooooooo!

    3. Re:Even worse: by Gentoo+Fan · · Score: 5, Funny

      Greedo: "Han, I am your mother!"

      Han: *BANG*

    4. Re:Even worse: by Odat · · Score: 1

      Ahh, so you've seen ThumbWars too then.

      --
      This signature would be seven words long if it were six words shorter.
    5. Re:Even worse: by Gudlyf · · Score: 5, Funny
      Wait, isn't that:

      Han: *BANG*
      Greedo: "Han, I am your...uhhh..."

      --
      Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
    6. Re:Even worse: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean this this comic?

    7. Re:Even worse: by 93,000 · · Score: 0

      Worse yet:

      Admiral Ackbar: "Luke, I am your date for the all-rebellion sock hop this Saturday."

    8. Re:Even worse: by Precipitous · · Score: 2, Funny

      I have a rotten suspision all these "I am your father" jokes have something to do with a dramatic ending, that is now totally spoiled for me.

      When are you slashdot guys gonna realize that not everyone sees movies in the opening night / decade? I was waiting for the DVD of this Star Wars stuff.

      --
      My motto: "A cat is no trade for integrity."
    9. Re:Even worse: by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

      Luke: "Admiral Ackbar, you are my dinner!"

      Ackbar: "Nooooooooooo!"

      --
      Huh?
    10. Re:Even worse: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was

      Han: *BANG*
      Greedo: Your mother...

  27. Re:The future... by DrXym · · Score: 3, Funny

    Lucas was concerned by the fan backlash over the constant re-releases, enough that he issued a press release.

    It reads:

    "Squeal piggy!"

  28. Re:The future... by BHearsum · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think you mean Alderaan.

    Your geek license has been revoked.

  29. Revisionist BS artist by StefanJ · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Man, I'm really coming to dispise this guy.

    Read the unauthorized bio, Sky Walking, to get an idea of the changes that _Star Wars_ went through during its conception. No, the whole thing didn't occur to him in a flash with only technology holding him back from implementing it.

    Like pretty much everybody, he made it up as he went along.

    Even more pathetic: Why hasn't he done anything elese? Speilberg, love him or hate him, has gone beyond his kiddie-film origins, branched out and done lots of different sorts of films. He's grown up. He doesn't deal in comfortable bullshit any more.

    Lucas, he's put a clothespin on his nose, settled in a bed of comfortable bullshit, and thinks he's doing us a favor by inviting us in.

    Stefan

    1. Re:Revisionist BS artist by jcenters · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Yeah, and if you read the original drafts for "The Star Wars," you'll realize that without a ton of revision and doctoring, it would have probably been one of the worst films ever, right up there with "Manos: The Hand of Fate."

      Typical line from the early drafts: "LUKE STARKILLER slashes through the IMPERIAL BAD-GUY with his LAZER-SWORD. IMPERIAL BAD-GUY SCREAMS TO A VIOLENT DEATH."

      Well, you get the idea. But if you do read them, you'll discover why the prequels are so awful. This is George Lucas's true talent right here folks, and after seeing it, you understand why he doesn't do anything else these days.

      On a side note, Lucas can cram all that CGI right up his ass. A lot of the best special effects in the original trilogy were the simplest. Remember how everyone was wowed by Vader's force-telekinesis at the end of Empire? Yeah, a couple of guys throwing boxes at Mark Hamill, but cool on screen nonetheless.

      I think a lot of filmmakers are forgetting one of the principles of SFX: If the audience notices them, then they've failed to do their job. For instance, in the original Star Wars SE, it's pretty obvious that Jabba the Hutt is a poorly rendered CGI blob. I notice this right off the bat, and it destroys the illusion. On the other hand, if I watch RotJ, released in the dark ages of the 1980s, Jabba's merely a "primitive" puppet, but damnit he seems real.

      Lucas originally created a universe that all of felt we could visit, if we had a light-speed ship and maybe a time machine. The prequels feel more like an example of why LSD and children's breakfast cereal don't mix.

      --

      vi ~/.emacs

    2. Re:Revisionist BS artist by sharkey · · Score: 2, Funny
      Yeah, a couple of guys throwing boxes at Mark Hamill, but cool on screen nonetheless.

      On or off screen notwithstanding, who HASN'T wanted to throw boxes at Mark Hamill? Anyone?? Anyone??

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    3. Re:Revisionist BS artist by funk_phenomenon · · Score: 1

      He still follows the "make it up as I go along" mentality in the new films. Just watch the documentaries on the Episode 2 DVD to see proof. Lucas would walk in and say he would like it some way, the animation staff do it that way, then he comments again. Even the bad guys are a crap shoot of drawings tacked on a large cork board for Lucas to point at and say he likes.

      --

      Even the samurai
      have teddy bears,
      and even the teddy bears
      get drunk

    4. Re:Revisionist BS artist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Luke be a Jedi toniiiiiiight"

    5. Re:Revisionist BS artist by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      There are exactly four reasons that the original Star Wars trilogy is remembered as a series of great films (quality varying a bit), rather than one really cool movie followed by two crappy sequels. The four reasons, in no particular order:

      1) Irving Kirshner
      2) Richard Marquand
      3) Leigh Brackett
      4) Lawrence Kasdan

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  30. Everyone wants to go back to finish things? by _archangel · · Score: 1

    "And even most artists, most painters, even composers would want to come back and redo their work now. They've got a new perspective on it, they've got more resources, they have better technology, and they can fix or finish the things that were never done. ... I wanted to actually finish the film the way it was meant to be when I was originally doing it."

    The problem I see with this statement is that most artists, painters and composers create new works to apply their new resources and technology. They usually do not stay stuck in the past. And why does adding technology and resources change the content of the work (Han shoots first, etc.)?

    1. Re:Everyone wants to go back to finish things? by DocStoner · · Score: 1

      You are on the right track.

      So did John Williams want to go back and change any of the original music he had written for IV, V and VI? Does he want to use new technology to eliminate the ochestra and redo all of it on a synthesizer? No!

      Artists don't usually "correct" parts of their work. If anything, they might take the original idea and start over from scratch. (Rap music and it's sampling excluded, lol)

    2. Re:Everyone wants to go back to finish things? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, John Williams DID alter some of the music: specifically in Return of the Jedi in Jabba's lair, and at the end of the movie (removing the "Glug glug" Ewok music).

      The first musical change I could have done without, but after hearing it a few times, the new end music really grew on me, and IMO feels more like the end of a trilogy, as opposed to just the end of the adventure with the ewoks.

  31. Direction by Telastyn · · Score: 1

    What's that? Into the ground? C'mon George, we don't need an interview to see that

  32. What a clueless assclown by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Insightful


    AP: Why did you change your mind and decide to put the original three movies out on DVD now?

    Lucas: Just because the market has shifted so dramatically. A lot of people are getting very worried about piracy. That has really eaten dramatically into the sales. It really just came down to, there may not be a market when I wanted to bring it out, which was like, three years from now. So rather than just sit by and watch the whole thing fall apart, better to bring it out early and get it over with.


    No, George, there may very well not be a market for this in three years. And not because of piracy. Because Star Wars is dead. 20 years ago I was into Star Wars as a kid, I bought the toys and had light saber duels in the playground with the other kids.

    20 years later, and my kids really don't give a shit about Star Wars. This time around, you lost their interest to such notable franchises as "Spy Kids".

    I'm not kidding. I tried to take my boy to Star Wars when it was re-released in theatres. He was bored, and couldn't sit through it's dated effects and cheesy dialog. I know Jar-Jar was supposed to suck the little kids into the Star Wars world, but he didn't. My kids thought him as annoying as I did.

    There will be no market for Star Wars in 3 years, simply because it's uncompelling poorly written and over-marketted crap.

    Much like Star Wars, it's original hardcore fanbase is growing up and dying off. The new stuff is not attracting new fans.

    There's no market for a sequel to Citizen Kane either.

    But of course, this idiot is inable to comprehend the writing on the wall, and follows the industry standard of blaming it all on piracy.

    Make a good movie, and I'll pay to watch it.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:What a clueless assclown by sgant · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree, I have an 11 year old and he isn't interested in Star Wars at all. Know what he likes (over and over and over and over)...the Pixar movies and Shrek. Oh, and Harry Potter too. Throw in some Simpsons and Futurama and Spongebob and he's as sound as a pound.

      But Star Wars? He's like "Meh..."

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    2. Re:What a clueless assclown by Chordonblue · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "AP: Why did you change your mind and decide to put the original three movies out on DVD now?

      Lucas: Just because the market has shifted so dramatically. A lot of people are getting very worried about piracy. That has really eaten dramatically into the sales. "

      Oh man, my bullshit-0-meter just went off the scale. Time to use 'Lucasian' calibration...

      The first time I saw Star Wars at home was when a certain relative of mine showed his in-theatre shot Beta version of it - that was in 1980. It's not like piracy is some new phenomenon - it's been around in various forms since media became available.

      He's releasing it now because it's the perfect time to do so. With the THX-1138 remake and the 'Sith' movie around the corner, this is the ultimate 'hype' time. Well, at least until the HD versions appear...

      buy, Buy, BUY CONSUMER!

      --
      "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
    3. Re:What a clueless assclown by __aamkky7574 · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, I remember being 13 years old and seeing "Return of the Jedi" on pirate VHS in the pub next door. That is, through the door, since kids weren't allowed in. Didn't stop me then going to see it in the cinema of course.

      P.

    4. Re:What a clueless assclown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There's no market for a sequel to Citizen Kane either."

      Yaah, but imagine a PREQUEL! That would be fabulous. You'd see his childhood, how he was raised and got rosebud, then eaving his family. And the kid would be played by that Haley Joel Osment from the Sixth Sense. Touching.

      Ehhhhhh

  33. Lucas Interview Special Edition (Orig. rereleased) by Jakhel · · Score: 5, Funny

    Scenes from the original include..

    AP: Why not release both the originals and special editions on DVD?

    Lucas: The special edition, that's the one I wanted out there. The other movie, it's on VHS, if anybody wants it. ... I'm not going to spend the, we're talking millions of dollars here, the money and the time to refurbish that, because to me, it doesn't really exist anymore. It's like this is the movie I wanted it to be, and I'm sorry you saw half a completed film and fell in love with it. But I want it to be the way I want it to be. I'm the one who has to take responsibility for it. I'm the one who has to have everybody throw rocks at me all the time, so at least if they're going to throw rocks at me, they're going to throw rocks at me for something I love rather than something I think is not very good, or at least something I think is not finished.

    AP: Do you pay much attention to fan reactions to your choices?

    Lucas: Not really. The movies are what the movies are. ... The thing about science-fiction fans and "Star Wars" fans is they're very independent-thinking people. They all think outside the box, but they all have very strong ideas about what should happen, and they think it should be their way. Which is fine, except I'm making the movies, so I should have it my way.


    Special edition scenes..

    AP: Why not release both the originals and special editions on DVD?

    Lucas: I'm George Lucas, bitch!

    AP: Do you pay much attention to fan reactions to your choices?

    Lucas: Yes, in fact I have a joke for the fans. What did the five fingers say to the face?

    AP: Uhh..

    Lucas smacks AP

    Lucas: SLAP!

    AP: ...

    Lucas: I'm George Lucas, bitch!

  34. In fairness .... by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As much as I don't really like that he's gone back in time and changed things, I can see his point of view.

    I can also see why he's not willing to spend millions of dollars and a lot of time touching up the original version. But that's because he would want to give it the whole THX treatment as well as the digital touch up.

    However, if he just did zero work on it and just put it on disk, I can't see it being too difficult to do. Not that Lucas would ever release a completely stripped down, un-fancy movie.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:In fairness .... by wattersa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Good points-- my biggest problem with the special editions was the new effects being unnecessary or integrating poorly with the originals. The Jabba the Hutt in the first special edition was really poorly done, he looked all blurry and was a different shade of color than the Jedi Jabba the Hutt. I admit that the sand pit in Jedi did look way too much like a really nasty vagina until Lucas put in the appendage with the beak, so that's fixed.

    2. Re:In fairness .... by Cowclops · · Score: 1

      In fact, thats where people like me step in with home made DVDs. Laserdisc players are hardly ubiqutious, but put the right hardware in the right hands and you can get a pretty damn good production. The problem is, most of the home made DVDs out there are "the right hardware in the wrong hands" so they're not exactly good picture quality. My problem is I know exactly how I'd do it if I had the best hardware (I already did it once with a DV camcorder as the transcoding device, and its ok but not as good as it could be) but I can't afford real stuff. Now that I'm working at Avid (company that makes video editing stuff) I might be able to borrow something for a couple days and get it done right. Until then, its only speculation.

    3. Re:In fairness .... by miskatonic+alumnus · · Score: 1

      Go George! He's absolutely right. He doesn't HAVE to spend millions of dollars touching up the original. And, he also doesn't HAVE to receive my $54.99 (or whatever will be charged) for the 3-dvd set because I'm not buying it, downloading it, or watching it.

      I'm not going to throw rocks at Lucas. But, I'm not going to throw any money either.

    4. Re:In fairness .... by Heywood+Yabuzof · · Score: 1


      He says it will cost millions...but if he released another box set with just the original versions on DVD, he would make millions. That argument really doesn't make sense.

      I'll buy the part about him not wanting to spend the time on it, and it not being the way he wanted it to be, but don't tell us it's too expensive when you are pretty much guaranteed to sell boatloads of DVDs no matter which versions you release.

    5. Re:In fairness .... by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      I agree with you, I see where he's coming from, but people aren't ASKING for a THX version or a digital touch-up (although it would be nice) hell, he could just put an original copy with poor sound and all as an 'extra' on the DVD and I'm sure he'd satisfy a lot of people.

      I wonder... He says it's too expensive to touch up the version he doesn't want anyone to see (which is silly to be embarassed about something so widely in demand, obviously people like it) but I think it may be beneficial costwise.. I think even not-so-hardcore fans would buy a retouched "This is the ORIGINAL Star Wars digitally remastered!" version. Hell, I'd probably break down and get -that-.

      -matt

    6. Re:In fairness .... by Scrameustache · · Score: 3, Funny

      the sand pit in Jedi did look way too much like a really nasty vagina until Lucas put in the appendage with the beak, so that's fixed.

      You've just made the original much more sinister to my eyes...

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    7. Re:In fairness .... by Rotting · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure the movie would really be enjoyable if they put it out on dvd without remastering it. I have the definitive collection on laserdisc which contains the original theatrical trailers. The trailers quality is honestly pretty bad. While I do like the overall orginalness of them, I don't know if I would really want to watch the movies if they were that quality. Who knows though, maybe they would have been somewhat presentable.

      I would love to have the originals on DVD cleaned up like the Indiana Jones trilogy but the decision to do this is obviously not up to me.

      Keep in mind that getting all pissy about him releasing updated versions will probably not get you anything but stress you do not need. It is easier to just not buy them when released if you feel stongly enough about it.

    8. Re:In fairness .... by ElectricPoppy · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not just a question of adding THX. The original film that you want copied onto DVD has degraded significantly. The color is way off - everything has a blue tint and some of the film has started to decay. So, he would have to touch it up digitally to release it. Otherwise, you would get something completely unwatchable on DVD.

    9. Re:In fairness .... by einTier · · Score: 1
      Of course, people sell DVD copies of the LaserDiscs all the time on eBay....

      Typically, they go for about $50 for the trilogy, so there's obviously a demand.

      --
      -------------------------------------------------- $665.95 -- retail price of the beast.
    10. Re:In fairness .... by Hawke666 · · Score: 1

      So, I take it you haven't seen many vaginas then...

    11. Re:In fairness .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I admit that the sand pit in Jedi did look way too much like a really nasty vagina

      MOM!!!

    12. Re:In fairness .... by badasscat · · Score: 1

      Good points-- my biggest problem with the special editions was the new effects being unnecessary or integrating poorly with the originals. The Jabba the Hutt in the first special edition was really poorly done, he looked all blurry and was a different shade of color than the Jedi Jabba the Hutt.

      Well, and this brings up another problem with Lucas' logic. The SE's can't be what his "real" vision was even if that is his justification for them, because this scene was originally shot within the limitations that existed at the time. Jabba the Hutt was just some guy with a scraggly beard and a lot of weapons in the original scene; that's how the scene was shot, and the scene as it is on the DVD's is still the same scene.

      Now, the problem is time marches on, people get old and their thinking changes as technology moves forward. So you really can't just go back and re-do everything exactly the way you wanted it. Maybe Lucas really did originally want Jabba the Hutt to be this big, ugly, worm-like thing - maybe the dude who played him in the original Star Wars scene really was a placeholder. I don't believe it - I believe he invented the current Jabba for the later films - but let's give him the benefit of the doubt. The fact remains you can't go back. Look at that scene today. It is still quite obviously a compromise because Harrison Ford is too old to re-shoot that scene (and I doubt he'd do it anyway), so you've got him interacting with this worm thing that was originally intended to be a man. Ford's standing too close to him, his arm seems to pass through him several times, and Jabba himself appears smaller than he does in Return of the Jedi.

      What I'm saying is this is still not Lucas' original vision, whatever he says. It was a compromise to take that scene out and it's a compromise to put it back in the way it is today. Films are all about compromises; they're never 100% one person's vision because a) hundreds of people work on a film, many of which in creative positions, b) money is always an issue (there's no such thing as a movie that comes in "under-budget"; any film could benefit in some way from more money), and c) technical limitations (including optical limitations that are bound by the laws of physics) can make certain types of shots or scenes impossible. All Lucas has really done here is substitute one compromise for another.

      The point being there are good reasons why most filmmakers don't constantly re-make their movies. At some point, you call it done, knowing full well that your thinking, the available technology, and the available money may change later. It doesn't matter, because at a certain point, you just cannot go back and re-do things the way you originally wanted them. Despite what he says about other filmmakers, George Lucas is one of the only people in Hollywood that seems not to understand this (he's apparently been hanging out with Spielberg a bit too much).

      I also agree with those that say there was no technological reason for certain things that have been changed to have been the way they originally were. So he's really just making up new stuff as he goes along, he's rewriting the films based on how he feels today, not based on what he wanted at the time. There's no reason Greedo couldn't have shot first back then, and there's no reason a young actor couldn't have been inserted as Vader in the scene at the end of Jedi (of course, you wouldn't have recognized him, but that's not the point - the point is this was not a technological restraint, there's nothing about Lucas' "original vision" in the changed version. It's just a rewrite to get the original films to better mesh with the new ones, and it's unnecessary and distracting.)

    13. Re:In fairness .... by wattersa · · Score: 1

      Here's pics for comparison ;-)
      old one
      new one

      you might have to reload the tripod one a couple of times because of anti-hotlinking or whatever

    14. Re:In fairness .... by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Wait until you see the new version of that scene. Lucas digitally added a pair of monstrous hands on either side, forcing the Sarlac pit wide open. There's a website about it somewhere...

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    15. Re:In fairness .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's a vagina?

  35. Hmm. by nastro · · Score: 1

    AP: Do you pay much attention to fan reactions to your choices?

    Lucas: Not really. The movies are what the movies are. ... The thing about science-fiction fans and "Star Wars" fans is they're very independent-thinking people. They all think outside the box, but they all have very strong ideas about what should happen, and they think it should be their way. Which is fine, except I'm making the movies, so I should have it my way.

    I have the impression that what the fans want is plot consistancy, not the debacle with "who shot first?" and so on.

    Of course he has every right to do what he wants when making a film, but when he changes the course of events when he re-releases one of his films, people are gonna get pissed.

    1. Re:Hmm. by ShroomSolo · · Score: 1

      I hear in this release Han doesn't shoot at all! Greedo dies of natural causes.

    2. Re:Hmm. by nastro · · Score: 1

      Or they never even enter the cantina at all, they're negotiating via walkie-talkie. That's a good one.

  36. Is anyone else wondering... by mod_parent_down · · Score: 2, Funny
    how an Anonymous Poster got to interview Lucas?

    And WHY? You gotta milk that karma for all its worth!

  37. A Job Half-Done ?? by dbretton · · Score: 4, Funny

    "You know, it's too bad you need to get kind of half a job done and never get to finish it."

    George, do us all a favor:

    Envision Star Wars, exactly the way you would want it:
    Then go on a drug-induced bender of unprecedented proportions while making it.

    The end result: Half of a half-assed attempt at putting together the film in your visions, and possibly the greatest achievement of your career.

    1. Re:A Job Half-Done ?? by rich3rd · · Score: 1

      The end result: Half of a half-assed attempt at putting together the film in your visions, and possibly the greatest achievement of your career.

      THX-1138 will remain his greatest achievement, no matter how much he re-hashes his other crap. On the off chance that he does have another good film left in him, it will never get made if he spends the rest of his days playing in the SW sandbox. They say DaVinci carried the "Mona Lisa" portrait around with him for years, endlessly tweaking little details and insisting that it wasn't finished. That is not to put Lucas in the same ballpark as DaVinci (Lucas would be lucky to get a job as a valet parking attendant in said ballpark). Compare this to a real cinematic genius like Jim Jarmusch, who refuses to even watch one of his own films after it's finished, and all of Lucas' putzing around begins to look less like artistic perfectionism and more like plain old insecurity. I liked Star Wars when it came out, but that's probably because I was 12, and the F/X were badass to a kid who grew up watching Flash Gordon re-runs, ST-TOS and Dr. Who. But, like most people of my generation, I am waaaaay over it now. George needs to get over it too, cut the umbilical cord and do something new.

    2. Re:A Job Half-Done ?? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      When the going gets weird...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:A Job Half-Done ?? by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 1

      Then go on a drug-induced bender of unprecedented proportions while making it.

      Hell it worked for Apocolypse Now...

      --

      Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

  38. Q: Do you believe that consistency is important? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from the article:

    Lucas: ... I'm making the movies, so I should have it my way.

    AP: After "Episode III," will you ever revisit "Star Wars"?

    Lucas: Ultimately, I'm going to probably move it into television and let other people take it.

  39. Lucas sucks. by valkraider · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What an asshole. He basically said: "I know all the hard working and loyal fans want the originals but they can all go suck themselves off because I own the crap and I am god. But it's all OK because they'll bend over and take it anyway."

    And the worst part is that, based on the way he opened the interview, if we all decide to *not* buy this crap, they will blame the poor sales on PIRACY - not the fact that he is making a high priced product that people don't REALLY want (again).

    1. Re:Lucas sucks. by glwtta · · Score: 1
      Not that I don't think that Lucas is a douchebag, but what exactly does this "hard work" that the fans do consist of?

      Sitting there watching the crappy movies?

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    2. Re:Lucas sucks. by Steamhead · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > they will blame the poor sales on PIRACY

      Well I did download the original laser disk rips, so they are right, not releasing the original forced me to download the original!

      Enjoy:
      http://catsdorule.torpedobird.com/download/

    3. Re:Lucas sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let him make the argument. If he actually does, I will quite cheerfully cite it as an example of movie producers vastly overstating the damage that piracy has accopmlished.

    4. Re:Lucas sucks. by valkraider · · Score: 1

      Uhmm, the jobs that most people have so that they can have money to buy Star Wars crap? I didn't mean to imply that they had been "hard working" on the Star Wars movies. Billionairres telling me I don't matter, then asking me to fork out $50 for them - really pisses me off. In any market. Sports. Video games. Cars. I *work* for my money, and you should appreciate me as a CUSTOMER. If I treated my customers(clients) the way Lucas did in that interview - I would not have customers(clients) very long.

    5. Re:Lucas sucks. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      And in about six and a half hours, I will be done downloading episode IV laserdisc rip. I almost bought the laserdiscs used at streetlight once but I really didn't have the money to blow on that at the time. I wish I had done it anyway, though. My laserdisc player is here just to my right and run into a switchbox that goes into my DV bridge :P

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Lucas sucks. by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      Has anyone tried to mix the special editions and the old laserdisc ones?
      I would really like the old edition with the new AC3 soundtrack...

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    7. Re:Lucas sucks. by glwtta · · Score: 1
      Billionairres telling me I don't matter, then asking me to fork out $50 for them - really pisses me off.

      So what you are saying is that Lucas should think to himself "Hmm, these people work really hard at their jobs - I should make my movies the way they like them!"

      Get real, billionare or not, he's got no obligations to you whatsoever, regardless of how hard you work. And no one is "asking" you to do anything, these companies offer their products at certain prices and you are free to purchase them if you like. Just the fact that they are filthy rich in the first place indicates that they are doing something that a lot of people do like.

      If enough people decide they don't want to give him their money, he could reconsider his position, but again, that's pretty much his decision. He might prefer the integrity of his artistic vision over simply making more money (boy that's hard to say with a straight face!).

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
  40. Lucas BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's like this is the movie I wanted it to be, and I'm sorry you saw half a completed film and fell in love with it.

    Half completed? How? He added a bunch of filler scenes and touched up some special effects in the special editions. It's not like massive parts of the story were left out and put back in.

    If you read the novelization of Episode 2, which explains why padme fell in love with Anakin and details Anakin's murder of the sand people then you know that if anything Episode 2 is the half finished movie.

  41. where does the line start? by putch · · Score: 4, Funny
    I'm the one who has to have everybody throw rocks at me all the time, so at least if they're going to throw rocks at me, they're going to throw rocks at me for something I love rather than something I think is not very good, or at least something I think is not finished.

    where does the line to throw rocks at him start? do i need a ticket?

    what a pompous ass
    --
    just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand!
    1. Re:where does the line start? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If by rocks you mean large caliber bullets then I am all for that.

  42. Star wars SE isn't all that special/finished by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    After all, he still have 195 and counting bugs to fix. That means George will do more hacks on HD-DVD/Blu-Ray SWSE++ release.

    1. Re:Star wars SE isn't all that special/finished by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

      Star wars SE isn't all that special/finished

      After all, he still have 195 and counting bugs to fix. That means George will do more hacks on HD-DVD/Blu-Ray SWSE++ release.

      That's why I'll wait for "Star Wars SE DVD Set: Service Pack 1".

      --
      Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  43. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the most Insightful things I have read in a long time. *HINT HINT*

  44. A Bounty Will Be Next by blueZhift · · Score: 1

    Given Lucas' attititude about the original version of the Star Wars Trilogy, don't be surprised if he offers a bounty on the VHS sets out there. It'll be something like a discount on the DVD boxed set if you turn in a VHS set. Where will all of these VHS copies go? Why right next to all of those copies of ET for the Atari 2600 out in the desert! Lucas won't be satisfied until the original ceases to exist. It all has a very 1984esque feel to it.

  45. wait a while, then we can make our own by forgetmenot · · Score: 1

    That's ok... we'll just wait until 70 years after he dies and remake the original three the WE want it to be.

    Or do those copyright laws apply here?

    1. Re:wait a while, then we can make our own by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      That's ok... we'll just wait until 70 years after he dies and remake the original three the WE want it to be.

      I think your timeline is overly optimistic.

      And if they ever do let copyright expire, there will probably be a Public Domain Integrity Act to prevent anyone from readapting PD works as Disney's last post-mortem gasp to protect his works.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    2. Re:wait a while, then we can make our own by Cecil · · Score: 1

      You're assuming that in the next (70 + x) yearsthere will be no more copyright extensions. Unless Disney ceases to exist, I find that hard to believe. Given the current climate, copyright may as well be for an infinite time.

  46. I call bullshit.. by gl4ss · · Score: 3, Interesting

    on "And even most artists, most painters, even composers would want to come back and redo their work now.".

    they'd like to do NEW WORK...

    "I'm not going to spend the, we're talking millions of dollars here, the money and the time to refurbish that, because to me, it doesn't really exist anymore." umm. yeah sure.

    "Ultimately, I'm going to probably move it into television and let other people take it." -> "I've noticed that pokemon is a hell of a money making machine and that it's really important to get to the kids every saturday morning"

    disclaimer: the special editions aren't really that bad(they're done professionally after all and there's no yar yar..), but the reasoning the guy makes is just weak. though, for me the best stuff in the star wars universe were the games(more specifially, tie fighter) and books(the few good ones of them) - neither of which really happened in lucas's universe.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    1. Re:I call bullshit.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yay Thrawn! "Elementary my dear Pellaeon!"

    2. Re:I call bullshit.. by n8willis · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I seem to recall a Terry Gilliam comment (from interview or Brazil commentary) where he says he can't understand the fad of directors retreading their old projects years later.

      It was something like "that was 20 years ago, why would I want to go back and do it all over again? That movie is already finished, I have new ones I want to work on."

      If only the others understood....

      --
      -- Watch the REAL Jon Katz.
    3. Re:I call bullshit.. by gamgee5273 · · Score: 1
      First, I'm looking at my VHS and LaserDisc copies of the trilogy from 1995. It clearly says that they are the last time the original versions of the movies will be seen. I suggest, if you really need the original versions, then buy a LaserDisc player, buy The Star Wars Trilogy: The Definitive Collection LaserDisc set on eBay, and burn then to DVD. I have, and they look good.


      As for artists working on new work: Actually, no, you're wrong. I'm not defending Lucas, but you are speaking out of your ass. Cases in point:


      1) Ridley Scott re-cut and re-editied Blade Runner, making changes he wanted to exist in the first place. In fact, even though they aren't all due to Scott, BR has had more versions than Star Wars has, and there is rumored to be a definitive cut waiting for a bunch of legal issues to be worked out so it can be released on DVD.


      2) Tolkien came back and rewrote portions of the The Hobbit after he finished LOTR. Why? To make it correspond with the changes he made to Middle-earth in LOTR.


      3) Frank O'Connor rewrote entire published stories (the most famous being "Guests of a Nation"), and then published them again, when he decided that the dialects he had people speaking in really didn't work for the stories and felt forced.


      4) Issac Asimov stated, very clearly, in Fantastic Voyage II: Destination Brain that it was not a sequel but a reimagining of the original Fantastic Voyage.


      What else?


      5) The work Arthur C. Clarke did on 2001, both film and movie, was a reworking of his short story "The Sentinel."


      6) Stephen King redid The Stand, adding hundreds of pages to the text. Hell, his The Gunslinger has seen some three or four incarnations since his college days.


      And last, but not least:


      7) Shakespeare was continually rewriting his works - you can see that in the quartos the British Library put up on the web the other day (93 versions of 21 plays...).


      So, I ask you: Where should the bullshit be called?

  47. Who makes the choices.... by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 1

    AP: Do you pay much attention to fan reactions to your choices?

    Lucas: Not really. The movies are what the movies are. ... The thing about science-fiction fans and "Star Wars" fans is they're very independent-thinking people. They all think outside the box, but they all have very strong ideas about what should happen, and they think it should be their way. Which is fine, except I'm making the movies, so I should have it my way.


    And I will not spend any more money to see Star Wars nor buy any merchandise... and that's MY choice.

    --
    -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
    1. Re:Who makes the choices.... by jaredbpd · · Score: 1

      As huge of a SW fan as I have been my whole life, I made the choice to vote with my wallet against Episode 2. I never saw it in the theater, I never rented it, if it comes on TV, I change the channel. I plan on behaving exactly the same way towards Episode 3.

      ---

    2. Re:Who makes the choices.... by valkraider · · Score: 1

      Oh, so THATS what PIRACY is... All this time I thought they meant copying things... Glad to have that all cleared up... ;)

    3. Re:Who makes the choices.... by jaredbpd · · Score: 1

      You're right, I forgot to mention:

      I never downloaded Episode 2 off Scour, Limewire, Kazaa, eDonkley, or any of the others. My total Episode 2 exposure is nil, legit or otherwise.

    4. Re:Who makes the choices.... by valkraider · · Score: 1

      Me neither. Episode one was so bad, I never even had ANY desire to see Episode 2. And the last money I spent on StarWars was the last ORIGINAL release on VHS (pre SE).

      But I have bought probably 300 DVDs since that same timepoint, and seen countless movies... But it is PIRACY remember, that is causing lost sales. Couldn't possibly be Overpriced CRAP causing the decline...

  48. George is taking his toys home! by Atticka · · Score: 0

    Who pissed off Mr. Lucas? After reading the article George just sounds like a bitter old man crossed with an angry four year old...fine George! take your toys and go home!

    --
    No sig here...
    1. Re:George is taking his toys home! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's perfectly fine. He can take his precious toys and sit alone in his room playing with them.

      Lucas: *sniff* I was famous once! They'll come around someday, I know they will! *sniff* They don't know what they're missing. I'm God, I am!

  49. Actually good news by LetterJ · · Score: 1

    The best thing in that article was his statement that the move to TV will be left to someone else. Get rid of Lucas as the director and the TV incarnation has a chance.

  50. No, there is another... by jaredbpd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I want this prediction put down for future reference. This attitude we see Lucas taking here, this "it's my work and the fans can go pound sand and watch my sucky rediting and uninspired dialog"... We've been treated to a prequel of what Kevin Smith in 20 years. Hell, he's well on his way already.
    ---

    1. Re:No, there is another... by kindbud · · Score: 1

      Kevin Smith is no George Lucas.

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
  51. but what happens when Han wlaks over jabbas tail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember how lucas changed this for the special edition because in the orig han walked around a CGI jabba but if taking to be real it would seem han is walking straight THROUGH jabba the huts tail! Lucas' fix was rubbish tho han sort of just nudged up then down and a new CGI jabba just sort of went OOWCH O_o

    Thing is it looked unnatural and fake. I hope lucas fixes it again because IMO both the origonal and SE both didnt look right.

  52. Microsoft philosophy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    AP: Do you pay much attention to fan reactions to your choices?

    Lucas: Not really. The movies are what the movies are. ...

    Wow. in any other industry "do you care about your customers", people are trained to at least give them some lip service.

    I've never heard anyone flat out say, "no, I don't give a fuck about my customers."

    He sucks. Can't he be like any decent garage band and sell out to us guys asking for the han-shot-first version?

  53. The Greatest Thing to happen to STar Wars by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1
    Lucas: Ultimately, I'm going to probably move it into television and let other people take it.

    This could be the best thing to ever happen to SW since the originals. Of course it must be done correctly, but think about it: The Zahn novels as a series.

    I drool over thinking about Dark Force Rising (or was this just the comic book name) Luke joining the darkside and coming back, on television.

    Only if Lucas hands over the reigns though, ohh the potential.

  54. Here's a clue to Lucas, from a non-SW fan... by Denyer · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The other movie, it's on VHS, if anybody wants it. ... I'm not going to spend the, we're talking millions of dollars here, the money and the time to refurbish that, because to me, it doesn't really exist anymore

    ...fans of film in general don't care if the footage is refurbished. They just want a copy of the film as it was initially released in a format resistant to physical degradation.

    --
    Ph-nglui mglw'nafh Gates M'dna wgah'nagl fhtagn.
    1. Re:Here's a clue to Lucas, from a non-SW fan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They just want a copy of the film as it was initially released in a format resistant to physical degradation.
      And what would that be? DVD? Don't kid yourself.
    2. Re:Here's a clue to Lucas, from a non-SW fan... by darkstar949 · · Score: 1

      While DVD does wear out over time, it takes alot long than VHS does. Thus, it would be a preferable medium to have the movies released on. Of course, what would prevent the studio from saving the original in some form of a file on a computer and keeping several digital backups as well?

    3. Re:Here's a clue to Lucas, from a non-SW fan... by ajs · · Score: 1

      Ok, let me answer this as a programmer who has only been told how the process works. Someone who is actually in the business, feel free to correct me.

      "As it was originally realeased" is not a meaningful term in this conext. The editing of different versions of a film isn't as linear as most fans envision, and there's no real way to "just release that version over there". There is no "that version over there", there's just the original pre-edit masters which need to be massaged into a feature film and various "prints" that are unsuitable for mastering from.

      We viewers very often want to assume that there's some atomic state-transition between un-edited and edited, and that once you cross that barrier, everything else is "messing with the original". Not so; every "version" of a film is essentially a different editing process, and while various editing processes can build on each other (the guy who edits the DVD master most likely doesn't re-select camera angles, for example), they're not truly linear either, and scenes might be included or dropped for example, that were not included or dropped in the version you saw in the theater.

      You don't master DVDs from theater-house film stock.

      That said, I think Lucas would have been stunned, 5 or 10 years ago, at the reception that a new edit, similar to the original theatrical release, but on DVD, would have faired.

      All of THAT aside, I'd like to point out that these days much of this is moot. Hollywood is moving to digital, and "edits" are just an abstraction. Star Wars III will likely never be edited in the traditional sense, someone will just create and edit track that guides software in the process of creating a feature-length film out of the original master data. Once THAT is common-place (if it isn't already), then the assumptions about editing that fans have been making for decades will start to be truer.

  55. WOOOOOT!!! by miu · · Score: 1
    Ultimately, I'm going to probably move it into television and let other people take it.

    It's about time.

    --

    [Set Cain on fire and steal his lute.]
  56. Arrogant bastard by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    Lucas shows he doesn't respect the fans wishes, he only cares about his own self gratification.
    If he really cared about his fans, he would release the original version on DVD and make the bastard version as an optional or put it on the flip side, like Blade Runner did.

    George, we fell in love with the original, leave it alone. We don't care what YOU think, we care about what we grew up with. Don't trash our memories of the good times. It worked for us then and it made you filthy rich. Why do you insist on pissing on the little people that elevated you to such a high and mighty position?

    Sit back on your "Skywalker Ranch" and piss on the heads of the little people, the little people that paid for your empire..

    Oh, and BTW, I guess I'll have to put my old VHS tape onto DVD myself now. Thanks George..

  57. Larger rocks? by OverflowingBitBucket · · Score: 1

    Quoteth Lucas and AP:

    AP: Why not release both the originals and special editions on DVD?

    Lucas: The special edition, that's the one I wanted out there. The other movie, it's on VHS, if anybody wants it. ... I'm not going to spend the, we're talking millions of dollars here, the money and the time to refurbish that, because to me, it doesn't really exist anymore. It's like this is the movie I wanted it to be, and I'm sorry you saw half a completed film and fell in love with it. But I want it to be the way I want it to be. I'm the one who has to take responsibility for it. I'm the one who has to have everybody throw rocks at me all the time, so at least if they're going to throw rocks at me, they're going to throw rocks at me for something I love rather than something I think is not very good, or at least something I think is not finished.


    I think the problem is that we are using rocks that are far, far too small.

    (I still have my originals... bwah hah hah!)

  58. in 3 years from now, no more DVDs? by WormholeFiend · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Lucas: Just because the market has shifted so dramatically. A lot of people are getting very worried about piracy. That has really eaten dramatically into the sales. It really just came down to, there may not be a market when I wanted to bring it out, which was like, three years from now. So rather than just sit by and watch the whole thing fall apart, better to bring it out early and get it over with.

    My bold. I wonder what the MPAA's take is on this...

    1. Re:in 3 years from now, no more DVDs? by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      Their take? They don't have one on this because it's some vapor right out of George's asshole. He's rushing to get them out because he believes another format will be coming down the pipe very shortly and this might have a negative impact on the size of his "DVD version" take. He just pulled this piracy shit out of his ass because it's what everyone says today.

      I really, really loved Star Wars but I fucking hate this guy.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    2. Re:in 3 years from now, no more DVDs? by funk_phenomenon · · Score: 1

      There will be DVDs. The 6 DVD set of Star Wars, the cartoons from in between Episodes 2 and 3. There may even be a Blu-Ray format DVD, or a 4K version to show at theatres with convenient re-release of the trilogy. He could drop 7-9 on us and re-release it all again.

      Basically Lucas was pressured by market forces and not piracy concerns.

      I mean all the work has been done digitising all his films, and that is the hardest part. Lucas just has to sit back with his film source and laugh it some more to the bank.

      --

      Even the samurai
      have teddy bears,
      and even the teddy bears
      get drunk

  59. Re:The future... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ACK! /me cowers in shame.

  60. sigh by PreviouslySeen · · Score: 1

    Some of it might turn out to be pretty good. If I get the right people involved, it could be interesting.

    Unfortunately, this should have happened for eps I II and III.

    --
    Meet the new sig, same as the old sig
  61. Re:The future... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein [or was it Alderaan] now has weapons of mass destruction. There is no doubt he is amassing them to use against our friends, against our allies, and against us." - President of Vice, Cheney, August 2002

  62. Lucas can speak??? by ainsoph · · Score: 1

    Amazing!!

    All I have noticed he can do is mumble and drool on himself about some such shit. We only guess that its about Star Wars.

    Will the wonders ever cease?

  63. Does he know what he is doing to Star Wars? by jakel2k · · Score: 1, Insightful
    I honestly wonder if George really has any idea what he is doing to Star Wars. Everyone in there position should at very least read reviews from their fans. Is he really stuck in his own little world that all the changes and additions like Jar Jar are good things?

    This is a bad time for Sci-Fi lovers.

    • The Fall of the Matrix - (IMHO I didn't think the set was all that bad. But most people are very disappointed with Reloaded and Revolutions.)
    • Star Trek Withers - Enterprise is dying a slow and painful death. I agree in Lavar Burton's suggestion and let Star Trek sit for a few years to allow a thrist for Star Trek re kindle, There was a /. post a few days ago on this.
    • Star Wars Total Power Currupts Totally - George has lost, (distorted,) his vision on how the Star Wars world was great. I fear he might regrete his actions a few years down the road and apply similar drastick changes to episodes 1, 2, & 3.


    I guess there is always Transformers of my childhood.... oh wait.... what is this Beast Wars, Armmoda and Energon Transofrmers about?

    Arg.... where the hell is my Cherry Flavored Suicide Pill?
    1. Re:Does he know what he is doing to Star Wars? by Silverlancer · · Score: 1

      But there's still Stargate SG-1 and Atlantis to keep us warm :).

    2. Re:Does he know what he is doing to Star Wars? by jakel2k · · Score: 1

      Sorry I still look at the guys and think McGuyver, I know he has some Duct Tape somewhere in his uniform or close at hand.

    3. Re:Does he know what he is doing to Star Wars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah, the Stargate Network, formerly known as the Sci-Fi Network.

    4. Re:Does he know what he is doing to Star Wars? by ElectricPoppy · · Score: 2, Funny

      No shit! I swear to God that every fucking time I turn on the sci-fi channel that shit is playing! WTF? Would hurt them to maybe run Dr. Who again or something?

    5. Re:Does he know what he is doing to Star Wars? by Silverlancer · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Um, Stargate is NEW, and makes Star Trek look like total shit... best sci-fi show ever, period. Its the only reason IMO why the sci-fi channel exists, lol, its more like the Stargate channel :).

    6. Re:Does he know what he is doing to Star Wars? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      The matrix. I was very disapointed in the last 2 instalment for more then one reason. First it took off to far into the futre of events and looked like only the carectors names and faces were brought from the original. The second and most disapointing part it that reloaded and revolutions should have been one movie. Instead they pumped it full of filler that made me lose the feeling of being drawn into it while cutting one episode into two parts in order to make a little more money.

      If they did need to have two episodes, they should have made the filler of the first part have somethign to do more with the charectors developments and let the audience be aware of situations arising that led to the state the movie took off from. That would have been alot better then the stuff they pulled that distracted people from what little conection they were able to see.

      It would have been different if revolution was the first part of the series but i wanted to see it for the conection to the original movie. It was a big disapointment for alot of people on the same level.

      As for star wars, I totaly agree. Maybe we should start some type of boycott. Of course that would probably only efect those participating in it. I think maybe i will just download them from irc or somethign.

  64. Three words.... by carlmenezes · · Score: 2, Funny

    Jar Jar Jinx

    --
    Find a job you like and you will never work a day in your life.
  65. sorry, can't help it by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Luke: "Jar-Jar, I am your father"

    Jar-Jar"Noooooooooo! Thasa nasa true thasa imposseeble"

  66. Who read to the bottom of the article? by Wampus+Aurelius · · Score: 5, Interesting
    AP: After "Episode III," will you ever revisit "Star Wars"?

    Lucas: Ultimately, I'm going to probably move it into television and let other people take it. I'm sort of preserving the feature film part for what has happened and never go there again, but I can go off into various offshoots and things. You know, I've got offshoot novels, I've got offshoot comics. So it's very easy to say, "Well, OK, that's that genre, and I'll find a really talented person to take it and create it." Just like the comic books and the novels are somebody else's way of doing it. I don't mind that. Some of it might turn out to be pretty good. If I get the right people involved, it could be interesting.

    The Clone Wars cartoons on Cartoon Network are really good; here's hoping that more product like that comes out in the future.

    1. Re:Who read to the bottom of the article? by ALeavitt · · Score: 1

      The reason the Clone Wars cartoons are so good is because Lucas is giving the fans what they want. When the trailers for the prequels first came out, Star Wars fans, myself included, flooded the trailer website, watching the trailer again and again. We paid admission for movies like Wing Commander in order to see the trailers on the big screen. The trailers were the parts of the prequels that actually lived up to the hype. Lucas noticed this and gave us what we wanted - brief, action-heavy glimpses into the Star Wars universe, long enough to show us some cool visuals and a little bit of plot, but short enough that no one cares that the plot is as simple as "bad guys attack, good guys defend, good guys win."

      --
      This sig has been stolen. Return it to its original user for a reward.
    2. Re:Who read to the bottom of the article? by DrEasy · · Score: 1

      Yes, and Episodes I-III could have been excellent in cartoon format instead of the horrid CGI. No more actors talking to a blue wall, and we wouldn't have tried hard to take Jar Jar seriously.

      --
      "In our tactical decisions, we are operating contrary to our strategic interest."
  67. How Lucas Respects His Fans... by Cheesewhiz · · Score: 4, Funny
    AP: "Do you pay much attention to fan reactions to your choices?"
    Lucas: "Not really."

    Boy, I just feel all warm-and-fuzzy when I think of Lucas now... and I sure am looking forward to seeing "lava surfing" in "Revenge of the Sithians from Outer Space".

    --

    -----
    "Cogito Eggo Sum: I think, therefore, waffle."
    1. Re:How Lucas Respects His Fans... by mihalis · · Score: 1

      Boy, I just feel all warm-and-fuzzy when I think of Lucas now... and I sure am looking forward to seeing "lava surfing" in "Revenge of the Sithians from Outer Space".

      Oh get over yourself, George Lucas would serve his fans best by achieving his truest and finest artistic expression in the final Star Wars film. NOT trying to pander to specific fan wishes. What's he supposed to do, hold focus groups?

      "How was that burnt skin on Anakin for you? A bit too gruesome? ok, thanks for the feedback"

    2. Re:How Lucas Respects His Fans... by Cheesewhiz · · Score: 1
      "...George Lucas would serve his fans best by achieving his truest and finest artistic expression in the final Star Wars film. NOT trying to pander to specific fan wishes... What's he supposed to do, hold focus groups?"

      Explain to me how either "The Phantom Menace" or "Attack of the Clones" achieved Lucas' "truest and finest artistic expression", because from my perspective they were swamped in fruitless eye candy, bogged-down in terrible screenplays, and put-to-rest by taking superior actors and crushing their ability to perform.

      They were B-films. Attack of the Clones was at least entertaining, but neither Ep. I or II actually achieved anything groundbreaking or even worth remembering. They were cheap summer action movies, NOT works of art by any stretch of the imagination...

      That being said, maybe Lucas *should* hold some focus groups with fans, because from my perspective he's totally out of touch with reality, busy strip-mining his past works to earn barrel loads of cash.

      --

      -----
      "Cogito Eggo Sum: I think, therefore, waffle."
    3. Re:How Lucas Respects His Fans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      George Lucas would serve his fans best by achieving his truest and finest artistic expression in the final Star Wars film

      You really think so? Note the emphasis on "his"? A lot of performers don't get very far not caring about their fans, why should Lucas be any different? Next, he'll be claiming I, II and III got poor box office because they were also "half finished" films.

      Excellent excuse... Time to remake Waterworld and the Postman!

    4. Re:How Lucas Respects His Fans... by Gudlyf · · Score: 1

      It's obvious he doesn't care about fans. If he really cared about fans, he would have put Star Wars Kid in a cameo in the next movie.

      --
      Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
    5. Re:How Lucas Respects His Fans... by mihalis · · Score: 1

      Explain to me how either "The Phantom Menace" or "Attack of the Clones" achieved Lucas' "truest and finest artistic expression", because from my perspective they were swamped in fruitless eye candy, bogged-down in terrible screenplays, and put-to-rest by taking superior actors and crushing their ability to perform.

      You're making the incorrect assumption that I'm making a claim about those films. I'm not.

      What I want in episode III is a film to rival the best of the past. Like Alex Guinness in Ep. IV ("that's no moon") or Darth Vader's special chamber that we see in Empire Strikes Back at the same time as we hear the "Darth Theme" for the very first time. Hell, even "shut down all the garbage mashers on the detention level" is more enjoyable than all the scenes with kid Anakin put together. "I'll try a roll, that's a neat trick". Gaaaaah

      They were B-films. Attack of the Clones was at least entertaining, but neither Ep. I or II actually achieved anything groundbreaking or even worth remembering. They were cheap summer action movies, NOT works of art by any stretch of the imagination...

      Yeah, but I was talking about Episode III. You seemed to suggest he should care about what fans thought about episodes 1 and 2 and take it into account for 3. I'm saying no, if he would actually strive for greatness within his own sphere, that would serve fans best, in my view.

      I can't completely dismiss Ep 1 - the lightsaber 2-against-1-in-the-reactor duel was great, great music too. Duel of the Fates? Something like that.

      That being said, maybe Lucas *should* hold some focus groups with fans, because from my perspective he's totally out of touch with reality, busy strip-mining his past works to earn barrel loads of cash.

      It would be nice if he would stop producing such dreck and ruining the entire series, but I don't think focus groups is the way.

  68. Throw rocks, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is This large enough?

  69. Lucas puts them on DVD early because of...PIRACY?? by CaptRespect · · Score: 1

    From the artical:

    "AP: Why did you change your mind and decide to put the original three movies out on DVD now?

    Lucas: Just because the market has shifted so dramatically. A lot of people are getting very worried about piracy. That has really eaten dramatically into the sales. It really just came down to, there may not be a market when I wanted to bring it out, which was like, three years from now. So rather than just sit by and watch the whole thing fall apart, better to bring it out early and get it over with. "

    wtf?

    yes george people arn't going to buy star wars on DVD because they can download it off the internet. It has nothing to do with the fact that they already own 5 copies already, or the fact that you keep changing the movie from the original, or because the movie is 30 years old, or cause now when you watch it you think of Ep. 1 or Ep 2 and that makes you want to puke.

    Sounds like george is setting himself up for bad DVD sales. I used to be a huge fan, but I don't plan on buying the DVDs ... because I can download another copy off the internet. :)

  70. Lucas is no genius! by gosand · · Score: 5, Insightful
    It's like this is the movie I wanted it to be, and I'm sorry you saw half a completed film and fell in love with it.

    So basically what he says is, he got lucky with Star Wars. Because what he wanted to make was garbage. Look at the prequels - he had much more control over these, and comparatively they sucked. They are tripe on their own, without using the original three as a crutch.

    So the movies that people loved, and built his "empire" (so to speak) were not his true vision. We have seen his vision, and it isn't that great. So I think it is time to stop giving Lucas any credit for the first three movies. He doesn't want it, and he apparently doesn't deserve it. Actually, the more control he had, the worse the movies got. It was kind of obvious to me that he had more control with ROTJ, because of the Ewoks and some of the direction the story took. I am almost looking forward to EPIII - not to see it, but just to see how bad it is.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:Lucas is no genius! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I don't quite agree.

      While I do agree that, in the original trilogy, things were better when he had less control (Empire Strikes Back namely), he still had lots of control on the first one.

      I think the key is that Lucas is a different person now. It's been nearly 30 years since Ep 4! If he were to totally remake the original trilogy today from a clean sheet, they'd be totally different, and probably much worse movies. So of course the prequels are terrible, because his skills as a filmmaker have gone down the tubes in those 27 years. His motivations are probably different as well ($$$).

    2. Re:Lucas is no genius! by gosand · · Score: 2, Insightful
      While I do agree that, in the original trilogy, things were better when he had less control (Empire Strikes Back namely), he still had lots of control on the first one.


      But that is my point. He had control on the first one, and it was a huge hit - one of the top movies ever - but it wasn't the movie he wanted to make. He is saying that it was only about 30% of his vision. From what I have seen, I am glad we only got 30%, because I don't think that additional 70% would have been good. The more of his vision we get, the worse it gets.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    3. Re:Lucas is no genius! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      But when did he say it was only 30%? If he said that recently, it doesn't matter. No one knows exactly what they were thinking 30 years before. At the time, his feelings were different, and he was a totally different person.

      For another example, look at how musicians change over the years. Metallica, for instance, used to be a great band, but now they're greedy bastards.

    4. Re:Lucas is no genius! by gosand · · Score: 1
      But when did he say it was only 30%? If he said that recently, it doesn't matter. No one knows exactly what they were thinking 30 years before. At the time, his feelings were different, and he was a totally different person.

      It was in TFA, but he says that he said it back then:

      I wanted to actually finish the film the way it was meant to be when I was originally doing it. At the beginning, people went, "Don't you like it?" I said, "Well, the film only came out to be 25 or 30 percent of what I wanted it to be." They said, "What are you talking about?" So finally, I stopped saying that, b! ut if you read any interviews for about an eight- or nine-year period there, it was all about how disappointed I was and how unhappy I was and what a dismal experience it was. You know, it's too bad you need to get kind of half a job done and never get to finish it. So this was my chance to finish it.

      For another example, look at how musicians change over the years. Metallica, for instance, used to be a great band, but now they're greedy bastards.

      Yeah, I know. Metallica started its slide during the Black Album. I know, I know - many think it was their best album. But I liked Master of Puppets, and And Justice for All... Hey, I am all for them trying new things, and those things can be good, but it just isn't the same. GNR was never as good as they were on Appetite. Interesting side-note: I was at that concert in St. Louis when Axl jumped into the crowd and a riot broke out. That was crazy. I wish I would have kept my ticket stub.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    5. Re:Lucas is no genius! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know. Metallica started its slide during the Black Album. I know, I know - many think it was their best album. But I liked Master of Puppets, and And Justice for All...

      No, Puppets was absolutely their best album. Personally I think Ride the Lightning was 2nd.

      Hey, I am all for them trying new things, and those things can be good, but it just isn't the same.

      Trying new things is fine IF they turn out good. But what they did wasn't really trying new things, it was commercializing their music to make it more "accessible", and more popular. Simpler songs, shorter songs, more formulaism. These are things that get you onto MTV and radio more, and generate a lot of hype and short-term sales, but these are not things that build a long-term fanbase, or an album of music that's worth keeping in your collection for the next 50 years and listening to over and over again.

    6. Re:Lucas is no genius! by Schnapple · · Score: 1
      My (literary) analogy:

      My Wife was complaining that, in her opinion, the Harry Potter books were getting worse and worse. I haven't read past book #2 so I can't say what I think on the matter, but it did make me think of something.

      In 1978 when Stephen King submitted The Stand to his publisher, he was told it was too long. It was his fourth novel and the publisher had this formula based on how many his previous books had sold and how much they expected this next book to sell and how long it could be to maximize profit. The Stand was over 1200 pages long and it had to be trimmed to 800 pages.

      In 1994, Stephen King could do anything he wanted, so he decided to go back and put in 350 or so of those pages (50 he decided were better left out) and came out with The Stand: The Complete & Uncut Edition

      When J.K. Rowling published the first Harry Potter book, they wouldn't even let her put her full name on the book - the "J.K." were her initials, used to disguise the fact that she was a woman to any little boys who would want to buy the books. Also the books weren't very long. Now her novels are 800+ pages.

      So my theory is that Rowling ran into the same problem King had - being told to cut down the books, and it made the books better. Now her publisher pretty much puts out whatever she wants and the books suffer as a result.

      So sometimes having constraints is better.

    7. Re:Lucas is no genius! by SonOfThor · · Score: 1

      Ok I never read the "original" 800 page Stand, but I did read the 1200+ page one in 1994, and I gotta say that I quite enjoyed it.. I can't imagine what was left out of the first one but I really enjoyed all the background stories and such.. good stuff.

      I never watched the tv-movie of the Stand because I knew they could never do the fully 1200 pages justice.

    8. Re: Lucas is no genius! by gidds · · Score: 1
      I can't help feeling that people have a rosy-tinted view of Eps.4 & 5.

      After all, most of the things that people complain about in the more recent movies are there too. Ep.4 has it's incredibly annoying, 'cute', kiddy-friendly characters -- they're just in droid form rather than furry. It also has ludicrous-looking and cuddly aliens (in the cantina, on the chess board, &c) and droids (in the transport, on the Death Star), impressive but pointless action sequences, and so on and so forth. Ep.5 has all these too -- in fact, its cute character is not only one of the stars of the film, but a silly voice and irritating dialect he has, to boot! And of course they were the movies that invented the concept of merchandising and tie-ins.

      I'm not saying that they're as bad as the more recent ones, just that they seem to be a lot closer than you'd think from reading comments around these parts!

      Actually, if you want my opinion on what made Ep.1 worse than the older movies (I haven't seen Ep.2 yet), it wasn't any of the annoying characters, it was simply this: lack of focus. One of the things that made Eps.4-6 so successful (artistically as well as commercially) was their simplicity: they concentrated on a few characters and situations, and most of the background and backstory was implied; this gave meaning to the visuals, depth to the characters, and power to the drama. Whereas Ep.1 seemed determined to show us so much backstory and background that it appeared fragmented and obscure, its characters shallow and its situations confused.

      Drawing this comparison makes me cringe, but in that one respect alone the series isn't too different from LoTR. The basic plot of LoTR is actually fairly simple for its scope, and it concentrates on a few characters. There's an unprecedented amount of background and backstory, of course, which is what makes it so special; but again, that's mostly implied rather than shown. This keeps the storyline simple and the drama strong, while rewarding rereading and study. Where Tolkien actually presented some of that backstory, in the Silmarillion, he was arguably less successful.

      Anyway, getting back to the point, people don't always understand the effect of their expectations. When the first movie came out, there was probably a bit of hype, but people didn't expect a lot: just another pleasantly diverting sci-fi flick. Consequently, they were generally very impressed. But as people saw more of the films, got to enjoy them and had more invested in them emotionally -- and as people grew up and their tastes became more sophisticated, and they forgot just how little it took to impress them when they were young -- their expectations got higher and higher. I expect that many of Ep.1's viewers wouldn't have been satisfied unless it had been not just as good as Ep.4, but phenomenally better.

      In short: while I agree that Ep. 1's not as good as Eps.4 & 5, I think that it's not the pile of excrement, and they're not the masterpieces, that people seem to assume.

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    9. Re:Lucas is no genius! by oudzeeman · · Score: 1

      King is much cooler than Lucas though... King lives about a mile away from me, and I don't want to punch him when I see him at the grocery store. I can't say the same about Lucas. If I ran into him at the checkout line, I'd puch him in the face. King keeps to himself much more (case of all the crazy stalker type people) so I haven't seen him around town for several years... I guess he can pay someone to get his groceries now.

  71. You know what? by Greyfox · · Score: 1
    His movies have always been for the kids and he's just going to go back and remove any plot elements that are even remotely adult-themed without a care for whether it makes sense or not. It doesn't need to make sense to the kids -- they're too awed by the special effects and dreams of being an x-wing pilot to worry about how you can miss a target from 4 feet away or the internal struggles of the main characters. I wouldn't be surprised to see Lucas remove The Empire Stikes Back comepletely from the canon, and I think most adults will agree that it was the best film in the series.

    I lost interest after The Phantom Menace and I have no intention of ever giving Lucas another penny. I can find more compelling story lines and characters elsewhere.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:You know what? by jaredbpd · · Score: 1

      The worst thing that ever happened to George Lucas's ability to make quality movies was having children of his own. There's a marked difference between his early works (childless), and the current crap (made after he became a father).
      ---

    2. Re:You know what? by emtboy9 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I am probably as big or bigger a fan of Star Wars than most people, but come on now... Internal struggles of the main characters? Which version of the original trilogy did you watch? Lets not mince words, for those were definitly NOT the paragon of oscar winning performance. Perhaps the effects, which were simply amazing for late 70s on a shoe-string budget, but the acting was and is lackluster.

      But thats not the point of it all... If you want character development, read the books. If you want to simply be entertained, stop whining, and get in line like the rest of us to get a box set on Tuesday morning.

      It really amazes me that so many people claim ownership to someone elses work. This is and was His deal. George Lucas created it, made it, brought it to life. We are and were just along for the ride. Passengers on the train, if you will. You can always get on or off the train, but only the Engineer gets to drive, and none of us are the Engineer.

      George Lucas has always considered Star Wars a work of art, and at that, one that he was never satisified with. Even in 77 when ANH was first released, he was dissatisfied with the way it turned out (even though it was a hit at the box office). So it is not like this was anything new, it just took 15-20 years to get the technology for him to rework the films to the way that he originally wanted to see it...

      but then again, that and all other pertinant facts are usually very conveniently ignored when the question of Greedo and/or Han shooting first comes up...

      --
      "Our funds have never taken part in toxic or death spiral convertible financings of any sort" -BayStar's managing partne
    3. Re:You know what? by Greyfox · · Score: 2, Insightful
      True they weren't Oscar winning performances, but he's making them worse. I'm not claiming ownership of his works and I'm off that train. Something strange I've noticed is that people often seem surprised when I tell them I'm not interested in the latest Star Wars movie. As if not seeing them simply wasn't an option.

      The issue of Greedo firing first is always brought up because it's just so unbelieveable and so radically changes Han's character that it really stands out as a symbol of Lucas's arrogance and willingness to radically change something that the older fans remember as "history." And I was still willing to give him the benefit of the doubt despite him cramming that down our throats, but after TPM I just gave up on the series. I just wish I had stopped after "Return of the Jedi."

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    4. Re:You know what? by prockcore · · Score: 1

      it just took 15-20 years to get the technology for him to rework the films to the way that he originally wanted to see it...

      Yeah, technology back in 77 was too primitive to show Greedo shooting first.

    5. Re:You know what? by Laur · · Score: 1
      It really amazes me that so many people claim ownership to someone elses work. This is and was His deal. George Lucas created it, made it, brought it to life. We are and were just along for the ride. Passengers on the train, if you will. You can always get on or off the train, but only the Engineer gets to drive, and none of us are the Engineer.

      I disagree. I believe that you cannot own a creative work or idea once you release it to the public. How is it possible to own something so intangible anyway? For example, I can replay many scenes from Star Wars in my head right now. Does Lucas own the very thoughts in my head? What a truly frightening and ultimately ridiculous idea.

      Even the law does not say that creators own their works. What they do own is a set of rights regarding those works, such as the right to distribute, make copies, and create derivative works. This is a subtle yet important distinction! Also, it is important to remember that these rights are temporary and will fully revert to the public eventually (for the sake of argument I am assuming that copyrights will eventually expire). So it could be argued that creators don't even own these rights, they are merely holding them in trust for the public.

      Yet another point is that no one exists in a creative vacuum. Lucas used many sources as inspiration for the films, some of which he even outlined in the article. In addition, the movies were not made by one person. Many, many other people contributed to making Star Wars what it is (or was), attempting to assign total ownership to one man (as you are doing) is ludicrous. So enough of this bullshit that Lucas owns the works and he can do whatever he wants. Like any creative work, it now belongs to everyone and no one, Lucas's temporary privileges notwithstanding. Furthermore, Star Wars is now a part of our culture, just as the ancient mythology it is partly based of off was a part of the culture at the time. While I do not claim personal ownership of Star Was, I don't think Lucas can either.

      --
      When you lose something irreplaceable, you don't mourn for the thing you lost, you mourn for yourself. - Harpo Marx
    6. Re:You know what? by Viking+Coder · · Score: 1

      Funny that you would mention character development.

      Because character development is what happens when you take a scummy smuggler, and by the end of the story, he helps save a planet.

      But what Lucas has done is to turn Han into a goody-two-shoes from the very beginning, thus sucking all of the character development out of one of the most beloved characters in the movie.

      Read some of my other posts on this article, if you're interested in my criticism of the rest of your 'Engineer' points.

      --
      Education is the silver bullet.
  72. Even worse... by artemis67 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Jar Jar Binks: "Luke, meesa is your father!"

    Luke: (turning lightsaber onto himself) "Nooooooo!"

    1. Re:Even worse... by roman_mir · · Score: 5, Funny

      Jabba the Hutt: Luke....

      Luke: - Oh, no.

    2. Re:Even worse... by Dan+D. · · Score: 4, Funny
      Man ... with all these "Luke, I am your father" posts, it would appear Amidala really got around. Did they have paternity tests in "Long ago" and "Far, far away?"

      I'm sure there's a naked and petrified somewhere in there... but I refuse, I tell you!

      --
      People who quote themselves bug the crap out of me -- Me.
    3. Re:Even worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That brings up a good point.

      Since Anakin is going to turn evil, will we get to have him kill JarJar or something?

      At least it's one way of turning to the dark side the fans would enjoy...

    4. Re:Even worse... by FauxPasIII · · Score: 4, Funny

      Who is Luke's Father?

      Is it... Darth Vader ?
      ... Officer Barbrady ?
      ... The 1987 Denver Broncos ?

      --
      25% Funny, 25% Insightful, 25% Informative, 25% Troll
    5. Re:Even worse... by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 4, Funny

      Luke: - Oh, no.

      Translated into Star Wars canonical form, that would be:

      Luke: I've got a bad feeling about this...

    6. Re:Even worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Han was petrified. But definately not naked. Or covered in grits.

    7. Re:Even worse... by artemis67 · · Score: 1

      If he was truly evil...

      Not only would he have preserved Jar Jar's life, but he would have given him a prominent role in Episodes 4, 5 and 6.

      If he killed Jar Jar, then he couldn't have been all bad.

    8. Re:Even worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this is moderated as Insightful!?! OMG!!!

    9. Re:Even worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The donator of the mystery sperm is... hockey legend Gordie Howe.

    10. Re:Even worse... by obender · · Score: 1

      Cowboy Neal

    11. Re:Even worse... by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

      >>Jabba the Hutt: Luke....

      Luke: "I've got a bad feeling about this...."

      --
      Huh?
    12. Re:Even worse... by julesh · · Score: 1

      Man ... with all these "Luke, I am your father" posts, it would appear Amidala really got around. Did they have paternity tests in "Long ago" and "Far, far away?"

      I'm sure there's a naked and petrified somewhere in there... but I refuse, I tell you!


      I tell you, I'd be petrified at the idea of sleeping with either Jar-Jar _or_ Jabba.

    13. Re:Even worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he killed Jar Jar, then he couldn't have been all bad.
      Hence, Luke still senses the good in him.

  73. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Insightful? This guy is nothing but a troll.

    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, this was the most insightful comment I have read here for a long time. Of course, if you're brainwashed, maybe you don't see it.

  74. Hey, these changes are a good thing... by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    See, it's like this. GL makes wacky changes to his films every couple of years. We just have to wait another 15 years or so for the 40th anniversiary, when he will re-edit it and have Han shooting first.

    The only problems is, the (then) current generation of /. will be whining about how he changed it from what they grew up with, but, hey you can't have everything...

    Oota Guta, Solo?

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:Hey, these changes are a good thing... by FriedTurkey · · Score: 1

      The only problems is, the (then) current generation of /. will be whining about how he changed it from what they grew up with, but, hey you can't have everything...

      No. The next generation of slashdotters won't care. The Star Wars franchise is dying.

      The next generation of slashdotters will be talking about Peter Jackson changing LOTR.

  75. Lucas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lucas desperatly needs to get his butt kicked every day for a month. Just some large guy named Lou that comes to his house with a 5 lb. NERF bat and starts swinging.

    Then Lucas needs to appologize.. A blanket appology.. For EVERYTHING.. He even needs to appologize for global warming and the backstreet boys.

    He needs to be punished... A billion dollar fine sent to the RIAA.. Heck I am sure their lawyers wouldn't mind one more person to sue.

    After that... Then he needs to give the copyright for Star Wars to someone with less ego and more brains...

    Which I suppose includes everyone on the planet.

  76. Interesting fear by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    At the start, when asked why he's releasing this set now instead of after the final release on Ep III, he says that he's worried there may not be a market for the DVD's in three years due to piracy!!

    Now while I'm sure movie piracy will increase, I can't believe that Lucas really thinks that even with high-quality rips that we could download in two minutes with super-broadband of the future, that millions upon millions of people would not STILL buy the movies and box sets at $300 a pop if they chose to price it that high.

    Give your fans a little credit for supporting you George. I can understand perhaps wanting to artistically perfect the movies, but have a little respect for the people that took you to where you are now and realize they will continue to do so.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  77. The best question to ask George would be.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So when is the Star Wars Christmas Special coming out on DVD?

    I'd love to see the reaction to that. He'd probably walk out on the interview.

  78. Best Part of the Interview by Gudlyf · · Score: 1, Redundant
    "Ultimately, I'm going to probably move it into television and let other people take it."

    I think I hear the sounds of sweet angels singing...

    --
    Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
    1. Re:Best Part of the Interview by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, they'll "take it", but he'll get all the credit, posthumously.

  79. no WMD on Death Star by SethJohnson · · Score: 4, Funny



    If Lucas has updated the original films for timeliness, he'd have the Rebel Alliance blow up the death star and all of its inhabitants, then afterwards find out that in fact there were no weapons of mass distruction on board. Additionally, Luke would revisit Tantooine and find that his Aunt and Uncle as well as the Jawas were actually all killed by some irate sand people, with no connection to the Empire.

    1. Re:no WMD on Death Star by BRSloth · · Score: 1

      Pfff. Everybody knows that the Javas where killed by Stormtroopers looking for stolen Empire robots.

      And Aunt and Uncle where killed when Aunt decided to blow everything when she got crazy when Luke disapeared.

      (Yup, I just watched "Troops" again).

    2. Re:no WMD on Death Star by ezthrust · · Score: 3, Funny

      Actually, the Empire would be the ones looking for WMD on Hoth and "smoking Luke out of his hole" on Bespin.

    3. Re:no WMD on Death Star by desolation+angel · · Score: 1
      No, it was just a domestic that got out of hand, fortunately captured on video. It's available here.

      --
      This time I could be arsed.
  80. Re:Lucas Interview Special Edition (Orig. rereleas by kikta · · Score: 3, Funny

    AP: What were you thinking when you created Jar-Jar Binks?

    Lucas: Well... cocaine is a hell of a drug.

  81. Geez... by Sirwar · · Score: 1

    What an assfag!

  82. It's his way! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    They all think outside the box, but they all have very strong ideas about what should happen, and they think it should be their way. Which is fine, except I'm making the movies, so I should have it my way.

    and his way sux
  83. Worried about piracy..... by BestNicksRTaken · · Score: 1

    Well I can't see many people buying this version as we all know it's going to be re-released with the new trilogy in a year or so in a spanking box set, like Lord Of The Rings.

    So I guess everyone will get a pirate copy of this version, and wait to spend their coffers on the full six episode version in a year.

    I do think it's BS that he thinks piracy will kill the whole industry with 3 years though! It didn't do it for music, and that's a lot easier to copy.

    --
    #include <sig.h>
  84. Zahn Trilogy by niola · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I been re-reading the Zahn trilogy and I tell you, I would LOVE to see that turned into a film with someone else directing it. Let Lucas be exec producer with Timothy Zahn, but let's get some fresh blood in to direct. Let someone like Peter Jackson try his had at it :)

    1. Re:Zahn Trilogy by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

      Is Peter Jackson REALLY any better as a director than GL? Now, I loved that someone made a real attempt at LOTR, but I wouldn't say that the directing was anything amazing.

      Think about it, it was Jackson that put in that wacked out, 'Oliphants are AT-ATs, and I'm a badass elf' crap. Why Peter? Did you really think that the audience would be bored at that point, and the film needed it? And the whole ending of the second movie with the siege of Ostigard (SP?), what was that about? A lot of his directoial blunders in the series were him adding in stuff that was intended to keep the excitement level up, but were just visual distractions.

      Peter Jackson isn't that great of a director. He is a popular director.

      --

      HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    2. Re:Zahn Trilogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear you man. Problem is, ain't gonna happen until Lucas is out of the picture. So maybe, say, 40 years from now when someone else takes over Lucasfilm.

    3. Re:Zahn Trilogy by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Read much? The books have those "oliphants" as well. They are by no means "elephants", though Tolkien obviously intended for a parallel to be drawn in some respects. Oliphants != elephants. And the whole "badass elves"? Seems pretty damn well executed to me.

      The Osengard battle, though - bang on, there. Still, your first criticism has no merit.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    4. Re:Zahn Trilogy by QuantumFTL · · Score: 1

      I been re-reading the Zahn trilogy and I tell you, I would LOVE to see that turned into a film with someone else directing it.

      I couldn't agree more. The books are fantastic (if you can fit all of the plot in the movie, its rather complex). It's got more flawed heros, better villains, and a plot that's not just the same old Star Wars B-movie plot.

      I'd pay an absurd amount of money to see this well done in a movie. Maybe the copyright will expire someday?

      Nah, must be dreaming...

    5. Re:Zahn Trilogy by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

      Read much? The books have those "oliphants" as well.

      Well, no actually, I don't. But I somehow seem to know that the battle at Osengard in the movie was radically out of whack with the books. Do you read much?

      And no, my first criticism has plenty of merrit. From RTOK, p213:

      ...Legolas sprinted alongside the Oliphant, and like a deft crack-crazed monkey lept about the beast. "Whee", he though to himself, "I can single handedly slay all the riders and destroy the firing platform. It's a good thing I'm an ELF(tm) and can approach a ancient battle like an olympic gymnastics event! Badass ELFIN POWERS, activate!"

      ..Oh, wait. I guess you were right. Nevermind.

      --

      HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    6. Re:Zahn Trilogy by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      Well, the Oliphaunts (described in the book like elephants, but much bigger) were used as war vehicles in the books.

      And the elves were pretty badass... Altho this isn't explicitly addressed in LOTR, the Silmarillion indicates it that they're pretty damned fierce fighters. Prof. Tolkein omitted any mention of shield/stair surfing, however...

      Also, the siege of Isengard is pretty much how the book portrayed it. The book kinda handled it in flashback, but the Ents DID rip up the wall, DID flood the circle around the tower, etc.

      Peter Jackson punched up the visuals in some scenes (would you rather have had Merry and Pippin spend 5 minutes explaining the battle a day later, as in the book?), but he didn't invent this stuff.

      (Now, the whole cliff-diving-Aragorn scene? Blasphemy :) )

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    7. Re:Zahn Trilogy by ndtechnologies · · Score: 2

      I completely agree with you. I have always thought (since I first read Zahn's SW series) that these would make excellent movies. I wouldn't necessarily have Peter Jackson direct them, but maybe Bryan Singer (X2:Xmen United). But the Zahn series, in my opinion is the best "spin-off" series for the Star Wars universe.

      --
      I have nothing clever to put here...
  85. What a whiner by LanMan04 · · Score: 1
    I'm the one who has to have everybody throw rocks at me all the time, so at least if they're going to throw rocks at me, they're going to throw rocks at me for something I love rather than something I think is not very good, or at least something I think is not finished.

    George old boy, no one threw rocks at you until you decided to tell everybody what should and shouldn't like. Seriously, what a bitch. I wouldn't mind the special editions so much if the original movies were available in decent, DVD form. You don't HAVE to watch them, you have the luxury of ignoring them. But to say that the original series "doesn't exist anymore"? That's retarded. People fell in love with that he created in the first place, and to say "no, you're all idiots, you aren't allowed to watch that anymore, you must watch THIS version and like it" is an act of total assitude.

    The worst part is how he acts like we've hurt his precious feelings. I LIKE movies that don't have tons of CGI cheese, and I LIKE the way the first SW movies were created. Ever see Aliens? That movie ROCKS becuase of the use of miniature models and lack of CGI (and awesome plot/acting), imagine if Ridley Scott was like "no, sorry, all old copies of Aliens have been destroyed, you have to watch this new version where the Aliens and Bishop are all fake-looking CGI, AND the mother Alien gives Ripley the finger, thus justifying the nuking of LB426". He'd get run out of town on a rail, just like Lucas has.

    Bottom line: If you're selfish enough to make movies only for yourself (as Lucas clearly does), at least offer the fans of your original work the OPTION of seeing it, instead of pretending it doesn't exist (and by not releasing it on DVD, he's literally throwing it away) and that it's a piece of shit. Way to make friends, George.

    Oh, and don't give me any crap about the "millions" it costs to restore the films, you'd make 1000x that amount on DVD sales, and if not that's tiny fraction of the Skywalker Ranch's giant vault of cash.
    --
    With the first link, the chain is forged.
  86. Too much whining by ramk13 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There's way too much whining in this thread. I don't like the changes, but honestly its his movie, not yours. It doesn't matter if you had some life changing experience or epiphany when you saw it. You don't own the story. If he wants to release a new version where Jar-Jar makes a cameo during the "I'm your father" scene, then so be it. You still have your movie and your moment. He can't take that away from you. Just enjoy it instead of calling him stupid (or other unoriginal insult) because you disagree with his changes.

    The fact that you can still see the original movie if you want is what takes my sympathy away from the whiners. It's not as if Leonardo was painting a mustache on the Mona Lisa. At worst it's like Leonardo using new technology to make a Mona Lisa II with a mustache and then selling it. Who cares. The original is still the original.

    If you are that desparate for DVD, find the best available source (laserdisc, old print) and pay for the transfer yourself. Why does he have to subsidize the transfer for you?

    (End rant. Willing to take a karma hit to get a clean swipe at the whiners.)

    1. Re:Too much whining by UncleBiggims · · Score: 1

      Couldn't agree more.

    2. Re:Too much whining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
      If you are that desparate for DVD, find the best available source (laserdisc, old print) and pay for the transfer yourself. Why does he have to subsidize the transfer for you?

      See, this is why we should go back to the original 14-year copyright terms. At this point, these should be our movies, and we should be able to buy the DVDs without subsidy by Lucas, and also without hunting down scarce, expensive laserdiscs.

    3. Re:Too much whining by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      "The fact that you can still see the original movie if you want"

      But that's the whole point: you can't. Not really. Can I go out and buy the originals? No. I can only buy a version I don't want or like; where character progression has been changed from their original paths, and which ends with a wrong Darth Vader and a disco on the planets.

      The only way to get the originals is to buy really old (and therefore degraded) VHS tapes, even more unfindable Laserdisc discs & find a player from somewhere; or become this pirate Lucas is so scared of and download the roiginals from a torrent somewhere.
      And out of all those options, the only one readily available to most people is the last: watch a bad reconstruction, or do something illagal. Maybe npow you can get why people are 'whining'.

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    4. Re:Too much whining by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      There's way too much whining in this thread. I don't like the changes, but honestly its his movie, not yours. It doesn't matter if you had some life changing experience or epiphany when you saw it. You don't own the story.

      No, but if things keep going the way they are, by the time we do own it (when its realeased in the public domain), Lucas will have destroyed it.

      We are not challenging his ownership, we are challenging his mental health.
      I think all his money and power clearly went to his head.

      Also, a lot of fat went to his neck.

      If you are that desparate for DVD, find the best available source (laserdisc, old print) and pay for the transfer yourself. Why does he have to subsidize the transfer for you?

      He's using a million macs and a gazillion petabytes of data to clean up the original, and then he goes ahead and damages that with a lot of nonsense. He *could* be selling us what we want, he's refusing to because he doesn't like what we liked. He's being a jerk about this and abusing the power he has thanks to copyrights.

      He's an egomaniac who refuses to aknowledge the fact that the movies "he" made were in fact made by a bunch of people, and that art always include an element of random mistakes and technical limitations worked into the final result in a (hopefully) harmonious way.

      In short: He's not making the movies better. He insists on changing them because he can, and we're all venting our frustration amongts ourselves. It helps us deal with this insanity to share with like minded people.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    5. Re:Too much whining by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      I wanted to elaborate on your post but I couldn't say it any better than you did.

      Oh excpet for this part.
      For crying out loud it's just a freaking movie.

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    6. Re:Too much whining by Slick_Snake · · Score: 1

      Actually Leonardo did put a mustache on the Mona Lisa. His understudies carefully corrected it. Maybe someone should correct Lucas's work before releasing it to the public.

    7. Re:Too much whining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There's way too much whining in this thread. I don't like the changes, but honestly its his movie, not yours.
      Fair enough. Once Lucas gives me my money back--you know, the money that helped pay for "his" movie and the sequels, turned them into colossal hits, allowed him to launch ILM, and otherwise helped make him into the multi-gazillionaire he is today--then I'll stop whining.
    8. Re:Too much whining by NEW22 · · Score: 1

      Here is how I see it. To me, DVDs are to VHS as CDs are to Cassette tapes. I had a decent amount of albums I liked that I used to own on cassette that I later purchased as CDs, because of all of the well known advantages of CDs, and some of the tapes had become dull sounding or had been eaten by the tape player a few times. Now it is rare to even find cassettes for sale anymore. Imagine if a group you loved refused to release their album in CD form, forcing you to dig around for old, possibly cruddy sounding cassettes, or maybe finding it is only available by illegal means, or maybe you have to buy an 8-track at a flea market or something. Of course, you could buy the new CD the band released, that is full of techno remixes of that album you loved, but that just doesn't quite cut it, does it? I remember one year for Christmas my Dad wanted some music by some old group, something along the lines of Foghat or Bad Company, but not them, and my Mom bought a CD with the few songs he wanted on it. Only the album was them going back into the studio many years later and rerecording the tracks. Needless to say, he doesn't listen to it much.

      So, that's my point. Both music and movies can leave us with great memories of certain times in our lives, or maybe we just really appreciated them artistically, aside from nostalgia, and we all realize that currently under law Star Wars is "his" to do with as he pleases, but the Star Wars movies, like so many other movies and songs, are also a part of "our" culture that we all own, and it just seems a little disrespectful to have earned hundreds of millions of dollars from adoring fans, then effectively deny us access to the work we loved. That's all it boils down to.

    9. Re:Too much whining by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      At this rate, when it's public domain, we'll be fucking dead. However, there are already numerous digital rips of the original movies, so assuming they are well-preserved, the movie could potentially last for all of the recorded history which is to come, if that makes any sense.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Too much whining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      For crying out loud it's just a freaking movie.

      Yes, but for the most part Lucas embodies all that is wrong with the changes with Hollywood of 1978 and Hollywood of 2004. Please, in your infinate patience, forgive us for using him as a scapegoat. He's the biggest fucking target at the moment.

    11. Re:Too much whining by sootman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Good idea. That's why I took my LD player and pre-SE copy of the trilogy, hooked it up to an analog-to-firewire converter, imported it with iMovie, dropped the iMovie files into FinalCut Pro, exported as MPEG2, and made DVDs with DVD Studip Pro.

      But you're missing the point. "Why does he have to subsidize the transfer for you?" Answer: HE DOESN'T. He would make a BLOODY FUCKING HUGE PROFIT if he would release the originals.

      90% of the people I know--geeks and nongeeks, fanboys and non-fanboys, would *rather* have the ORIGINALS. Period. The fanboys, well, we know why we want the originals. Everyone else, even if they don't know the finer points of han-shoots-first, just WANT the originals, for reasons they can't quite put their fingers on. Some thing the additions look tacky and added-on, other just, for some reason, like the IDEA that these are ORIGINAL. For the same reason some people would rather have a painting than a litho, or a *real* antique and not a repro.

      Think of it this way: there are X people who will buy Star Wars no matter what. But there are Y people that will NOT buy it because it's not the original. I suppose there are a few (we'll call them Z) who really *like* the new editions and *wouldn't* buy the originals. Do you really think that Z is greater than Y? Lucas *spent* all this money on TWO (!!!) rounds of retreads just to PISS OFF (and lose sales from) group Y.

      And remember these things: 1) the originals are ALREADY THERE. He can transfer them and clean them up a bit, THAT'S IT. He;s actually investing *more* money to change them! 2) DVD technology allows you to 'branch' as much as desired. Even Spielberg lets you see guns or walkie-talkies in ET. And no sense mentioning--3) he could release TWO WHOLE DVDs, one with the original version, and one with the new version. And there is a small group of collectors (um, group Q) that will buy both. Hell, my friend did--he has the trilogy TWICE on laserdisc--the pre-SE *and* the special editions.

      Lucas is acting like a spoiled child, that if you aren't going to play with his toys HIS WAY, you aren't goin to play with them at all. Really, it comes down to this: it would cost practically nothing to release the originals. He would make a buttload of money by doing so. Why isn't he?

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    12. Re:Too much whining by LarsWestergren · · Score: 1

      I don't like the changes, but honestly its his movie, not yours.

      You are utterly wrong. A released work belongs just as much to the audience as it does to the creators. I started a long reply, then I found that this guy said it before me.

      The fact that you can still see the original movie if you want is what takes my sympathy away from the whiners.

      Today perhaps, but with the centralized DRM of tomorrow promised to us, who knows?

      Willing to take a karma hit to get a clean swipe at the whiners.

      Yeah yeah... poor little predictable rebel.

      --

      Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die

    13. Re:Too much whining by Danathar · · Score: 1

      Why don't you look on ebay....the laserdiscs are NOT hard to find for the entire series

      http://search.ebay.com/star-wars-laserdisc

    14. Re:Too much whining by ghost_world · · Score: 1

      Actually, I heard that the original masters of Star Wars (circa 1977) were used up due to the unprecedented demand. So it would actually be a huge job to clean up a second or even third generation, overused copy to transferit to DVD.

    15. Re:Too much whining by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      Uhuh...and then I have to buy a laserdisk player too? And pay a nice premium to have the lot shipped overseas? And I need extra space in my room? And a switch for my tv, or pull wires for my dedicated Star Wars player?
      Now I am a geek, but I'm not that much of a geek to get something /that/ single-use. Plus, being a student, I don't have that kind of money to burn for something so limited.

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    16. Re:Too much whining by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Funny

      there are already numerous digital rips of the original movies, so assuming they are well-preserved

      Yeah, so long as Lucas doesn't start a pogrom, hunts down all copies and imprisons the owners for copyright infrigement and illegally disagreeing with Lord Lucas. ;-)

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    17. Re:Too much whining by AeroIllini · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, I heard that the original masters of Star Wars (circa 1977) were used up due to the unprecedented demand. So it would actually be a huge job to clean up a second or even third generation, overused copy to transferit to DVD.

      Even if this were true (and the other two masters would be circa 1981 and 1984), it still would not be hard. Consider this: the SE editions are already cleaned up and digitized. The original footage from the scenes that have been changed must also be digitized, since they needed to integrate the new SFX into those scenes, and thus they are already cleaned up.

      So George takes the scenes that were unchanged from the originals to the SE and throws them on a DVD, along with the remastered original footage that archived at ILM somewhere from when they added more CGI. Then he takes the THXified SE soundtrack, modifies it slightly to take out the new music, and viola! the originals are ready for transfer to DVD. The whole process might take ILM a week.

      Recipe for Star Wars Box Set Brilliance:
      - Take original and SE versions of Episodes IV, V and VI, and bake together on three discs (switchable through the menu).
      - Fold in the prequel discs once Episode III: Revenge of the Bad Title is available on DVD and stir.
      - Sprinkle 20 Clone Wars shorts on a disc.
      - Add four or five discs of special features (to taste).
      - Wrap each disc in a matching, sleekly designed plastic case.
      - Pour entire mixture into an elegant wood box.
      - Charge $200 for the whole set.

      --
      For security, the MD5 hash of this message and sig is 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
    18. Re:Too much whining by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      I have the original trilogy on VHS... what's it worth to ya? :)

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    19. Re:Too much whining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I'm not that much of a geek to get
      >something /that/ single-use. Plus,
      >being a student, I don't have that
      >kind of money to burn for something
      >so limited.

      Then don't complain, it's as simple as that! You want a "luxury" version, luxuries cost. If you can't "walk the walk", be happy with the "shitty" dvd versions.

      OF COURSE it'd be nice to have the originals on DVD, but as they will not be released and you seem to want to get them, don't whine - either buy them (ld+player or vhs:es) or shut up.

      (I'm am sincerely sorry if this sounded harsh, but that's just the way it is)

    20. Re:Too much whining by Danathar · · Score: 1

      laserdisc player = $40 bucks

      http://search.ebay.com/laserdisc-player

      and as for shipping overseas....I'm sure you could find somebody who is on the same CONTINENT as you are.

      As for being a starving student....I feel for ya...

    21. Re:Too much whining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>The fact that you can still see the original movie
      >>if you want is what takes my sympathy away from
      >>the whiners.
      >Today perhaps, but with the centralized DRM of
      >tomorrow promised to us, who knows?

      I didn't know they're attaching DRM functionality into old VHS and LD players.

    22. Re:Too much whining by arose · · Score: 1
      There's way too much whining in this thread. I don't like the changes, but honestly its his movie, not yours.
      You either haven't heard of a concept called culture or the "intelectual property" camp has done good brainwashin on you.
      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    23. Re:Too much whining by entrigant · · Score: 1

      Screw the originals I want the new shit.

    24. Re:Too much whining by m50d · · Score: 1

      The fact that you can still see the original movie if you want is what takes my sympathy away from the whiners. It's not as if Leonardo was painting a mustache on the Mona Lisa. At worst it's like Leonardo using new technology to make a Mona Lisa II with a mustache and then selling it. Who cares. The original is still the original. But the problem is George is trying to make it impossible to see the originals. It's like Leonardo making said Mona Lisa II and then hanging the original one in a gallery right next to a river which is known to frequently flood. VHS degrades, it degrades quite quickly, and the VHS originals are not easily available. Can you tell me where is the nearest brick-and-mortar store to Ipswich, UK, where I can get a VHS (or better, LD) copy of the originals?

      --
      I am trolling
    25. Re:Too much whining by sootman · · Score: 1

      Huh? The stuff he's running his effects on came from *somewhere.* And when he made the SE, he would have had to digitize the whole thing before he started adding the new effects, and he probably cleaned the whole thing up before adding effects in the first place! (I doubt he said "I'll tack on some effects here later, so don't clean this scene up until after the effects are in.") The version we all want is probably just laying around somewhere, ready to encode onto DVD.

      I don't mind tiny fixes, like cleaning up the shadow under the landspeeder in EP 4, or the sound work they do each and every time, but major effects (ring-around-the-death-star blow-up scene), new 'filler' scenes (jawas at mos eisley), and major story/plot changes (Hayden at the end of ROTJ, han shooting first, jabba in EP4) have *got* to go.

      I didn't mention but the DVDs I made look and sound at least as good as the widescreen THX trilogy on VHS (connected the LD player to the D/A converter with an S-video cable), they won't degrade from repeated viewings, they have chapters, and since I made them myself, there's no CSS, so I can dupe them as much as I want (for Backup Purposes Only (TM), of course.) I also made a fourth disk with all of the supplimental laserdisc extras (trailers and interviews)--just like a real boxed set!

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    26. Re:Too much whining by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      I know that 'that's the way it is'...which is exactly why I'm whining: I don't want the 'luxury version'...I want the stripped down, basic, no-extra-work-put-into-them-exept-digitisation(-wh ich-costs-nothing-as-studios-are-doing-that-for-pr eservation/archival-purposes-anyway) version. Not only that, but I, and many with me, are decrying Lucas' business sense, as we all know we'd buy that version in a heartbeat and that the profits would well-commiserate the outlay on production of said version.

      In simple terms: Lucas makes what we want, and he makes a shitload of money: artistry doesn't come into it, especially when he makes mass-media-art...the customer is always right (in much the same way that 'Brazil' by Terry Gilliam finally found the form it was meant to have, ie the form the custumorts (and luckily Terry himself) wanted it).

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    27. Re:Too much whining by Starsmore · · Score: 1
      If you want, you can store one of those backup sets at my house. ;)

      I'd even be willing to pay for the shipping and handling to get them there!

      --
      "If Common Sense was so common, it wouldn't be such a valued trait."
    28. Re:Too much whining by Trogre · · Score: 1

      The fact that you can still see the original movie if you want is what takes my sympathy away from the whiners. It's not as if Leonardo was painting a mustache on the Mona Lisa. At worst it's like Leonardo using new technology to make a Mona Lisa II with a mustache and then selling it. Who cares. The original is still the original. .. except you could still buy a print of the original Mona Lisa I.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  87. Why I've come to hate star wars by Tyndmyr · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "AP: Do you pay much attention to fan reactions to your choices?

    Lucas: Not really. The movies are what the movies are. ... The thing about science-fiction fans and "Star Wars" fans is they're very independent-thinking people. They all think outside the box, but they all have very strong ideas about what should happen, and they think it should be their way. Which is fine, except I'm making the movies, so I should have it my way. "

    The arrogance is apparent all throught the interview...I'm not surprised fans everywhere hate him. A question for all the fans out there. What do you think would have happened to episode 1, 2, had they been the first, if ep 4-6 had never happened? I think we all realize they would have been utter failures as movies. What changed?

    "And I'll do it in that mode from the 1930s Saturday matinee serials, using kind of 1930s and '40s sensibilities, and I'll base it on sort of mythological motifs and icons. I'll just put it together in a modern form, and I'll have fun."

    This is whats been lost... Mythological motifs? 30s and 40s feel? Tell me where that was in the new films, if you can. The grand tale of adventure is somehow lost in the inane squeals of Jar-jar and the rampant abuse of CGI. I'm sure I'll be burned at the stake for this, but Im getting sick of star wars.

    --
    Support more choices in goverment-Vote 3rd party.
    1. Re:Why I've come to hate star wars by AeroIllini · · Score: 1

      This is whats been lost... Mythological motifs? 30s and 40s feel? Tell me where that was in the new films, if you can. The grand tale of adventure is somehow lost in the inane squeals of Jar-jar and the rampant abuse of CGI. I'm sure I'll be burned at the stake for this, but Im getting sick of star wars.

      You're not the only one who's sick of Star Wars. George himself is obviously sick of it; he has lost all respect for the SW universe and is merely using them as whiz-bang money-generating vehicles now.

      Case in point: the first two movies (by which I mean A New Hope and The Empire Strikes Back) were good. Really, really good. They had elements of adventure, emotion, and a simple but elegant storyline. When he made these, George still had respect for the characters and stories. However, by the time Return of the Jedi came about, he was starting down the slippery slope toward silliness: the characters became much more one-dimensional, and the story became a way to move the audience from one action sequence to the next.

      And, of course, once the prequels hit theaters, it became increasingly obvious that the movies were nothing more than ILM showreels. The addition of mitichlorians and the conspicuous absence of the fall of the Jedi order, among other things, proved that George is no longer in it for the movies. He is now in it for the money.

      --
      For security, the MD5 hash of this message and sig is 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
  88. I will NOT... by untaken_name · · Score: 1

    ...ever spend a dime to pay for any version of my favorite childhood movie wherein Greedo shoots the ceiling a microsecond before Han blows him away. FUCK YOU GEORGE LUCAS and fuck your Greedo shooting first and your walkie-talkie guns. South Park got it just right.

    1. Re:I will NOT... by syrinx · · Score: 1

      your walkie-talkie guns

      eh?

      Unless I missed something, Steven Spielberg and George Lucas are different people.

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    2. Re:I will NOT... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't miss anything. I think he/she was trolling.

  89. Budgets by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 1, Redundant

    So GL claims that the SEs are what he really wanted to release originally but couldn't because he was limited by budgets and technology? So am I to also understand that Greedo was supposed to shoot first originally but the budget and technology only allowed for Han shooting first?

    --
    Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
    1. Re:Budgets by Council · · Score: 1

      That's really the only thing that pisses me off in the '97-ish special editions. So I looked around just now to find his justification for it:

      On altering the cantina confrontation between Han Solo and Greedo
      It was always meant that Greedo fired first. In the original film you don't get that too well. But in terms of Han's character, I didn't like the fact that when he was introduced the first thing he did is just gun somebody down in cold blood. That wasn't what was meant to be there. The other issue is a perception issue. We had three different versions of that shot: one he fires very close to when Han fires, one was three frames later, one was three frames later. And we sort of looked at it and tried to figure out which one would be perceivable, but wouldn't look corny. It's very hard to do that, because, I mean, obviously if you know the film real well and you're looking for that you see it. If you don't know the film very well and you're just watching the movie, it almost goes right by you. People don't perceive what's happened there, even now. So, it's trying to find that medium ground, and it's always this way in film, of what can the majority of the audience perceive and what can't they perceive. I like fast-paced movies--accusations have been made about this--and I like things to go by in an almost surreal way. So I'm caught between doing things that work for me--really understanding the scenes and understanding what's going on--and the audience, which I know is looking at something for the first time, and things go by in a very different way. So, there's always the conflict about where you draw the line. Perhaps I should have done it two frames sooner.

      (source: http://industrycentral.net/director_interviews/GL0 1.HTM )

      --
      xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
  90. And the answer is... by The-Bus · · Score: 1
    ...and the direction he intends to take it.


    Downward! And always spinning, spinning...
    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

  91. fans...i hope Han shoots you first... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what the god damn fans want is for Lucas to make the story their way..

    no their fucking choice... star wars fans need to grow up.. and get a life.

    star wars fans, the really hard core ones.. are pathetic.. who have nothing better to do than whine and bitch about Han shooting first.. who gives a fuck.. go spend your money on something else if you have such a problem with it.. shit.. all you people crying about lucas and him changing his movies need to quit whining... cripes.. after the 800th post about Han it gets tiresome..

    I understand why people love this films so much, I am a huge fan of the films. I am a filmmaker myself and love watching films.. but I also know when to let something go and move on.. star wars fans should learn this.

    1. Re:fans...i hope Han shoots you first... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I understand why people love this films so much, I am a huge fan of the films. I am a filmmaker myself and love watching films.. but I also know when to let something go and move on.. star wars fans should learn this.

      Let me get this perfectly clear. You came to a thread about Lucas changing his trilogy, and you didn't expect a bunch of irate fan posts? What, are you stupid?

  92. Re:Lucas Interview Special Edition (Orig. rereleas by ZenHarbinger · · Score: 1

    In the new special edition, AP slaps first.

    --
    This space intentionally left blank.
  93. Re:What a clueless assclown - Phantom Edit by Donoho · · Score: 1

    AP: Why did you change your mind and decide to put the original three movies out on DVD now?

    Lucas: Just because the market has shifted so dramatically. Have you seen the Phantom Edit of Episode II? Technological advances have allowed fans to show what a fluke the originally released trilogy was for me. That has really eaten dramatically into the sales. It really just came down to, there may not be a market when I wanted to bring it out, which was like, three years from now. So rather than just sit by and watch the whole thing [The revenue stream I can glean off of the remaining clueless] fall apart, better to bring it out early and get it over with.

  94. Everyone needs to pipe down... by Zaranne · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They're his movies, he can do with them what he wants to.

    If Picasso decided he didn't like the finished product of one of his paintings, he can take the thing, paint over it, and hang it back up. It's his choice.

    I have never understood the "purist" standpoint that everyone else has, when everyone else didn't start this thing in the first place. Granted, it would be nice to have the original VHS movies available on DVD, but hell, even those aren't the original THEATRICAL releases.

    Anyone who thinks Lucas sucks, needs to go get a life. Start complaining about how JK Rowling messes up Harry in her next book. Sheesh...

    --
    So when is the Hawkeye movie coming out?
    1. Re:Everyone needs to pipe down... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we were to discover that picasso was still alive today, could he go to where his paintings are kept, take them down, and toss them into the fire?

    2. Re:Everyone needs to pipe down... by Viking+Coder · · Score: 1

      He's an arrogant ass, who doesn't appreciate the people who made him what he is.

      We have a right to judge him for that. He thrust himself into the public eye, and we view his actions to be deplorable.

      What part of this is hard for you to understand?

      Actually, if you think about architects as artists, quite often it becomes illegal for the rightful owners of a building to destroy it, through preservation laws.

      And, the theatrical versions will eventually make it to DVD or whatever format people want, as soon as the copyright expires - which won't be soon enough, if you ask me.

      Any time a copyright holder refuses to publish his work, I get pissed. Like, when Disney puts a work into moratorium just to drive up demand.

      They have a legal right to do it, but not all legal actions are good. And we can (and in this case will) deride their actions, if we feel that they are bad.

      And you can pipe down, if you'd please.

      </smirk>

      --
      Education is the silver bullet.
    3. Re:Everyone needs to pipe down... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think he sucks, and I like my life. I could give a shit about the drivel in Harry Potter books, so why don't YOU get a life. You are missing the point entirely.

      The fact of the matter is, Lucas released a series of movies that were wildly popular. Years later, the same people that got into it before are itching to finally get versions that are as good as they remember. They can't, and that sucks, because every time that CG-rendered crap appears, it sticks out like a sore thumb.

      Next.

    4. Re:Everyone needs to pipe down... by gekkotron · · Score: 0

      Start complaining about how JK Rowling messes up Harry in her next book...

      Okay, I will.

      Rowling totally sold out after Azkaban.

      Dumbledore shoots first!!!

    5. Re:Everyone needs to pipe down... by Zaranne · · Score: 1

      You missed the point entirely.

      No I didn't. Yes, the populace was happy with the movies the way they were. SW:ANH will always be my favorite for that reason. BUT, they're just movies. They're not a way of life. They're not real. They're not changing the world. Well, maybe they changed the role of Sci-Fi as bonified movie genre, but that's it.

      I'm tired of all the whining and complaining about what Lucas did to HIS vision. He wasn't happy with them, so he fixed them to what he wanted them to be. So be it.

      Apparently, "these aren't the movies you're looking for. Move along."

      --
      So when is the Hawkeye movie coming out?
    6. Re:Everyone needs to pipe down... by Zaranne · · Score: 1

      Uh, only if he owned them. But that proves my point. Lucas does own the rights, or at least has the ability to obtain the permission, to change what ever he likes. The "populace" does not have these rights.

      Frankly, if I owned a Picasso, and he came to me and said he needed to fix something on it, I'd be the first to let him. It was his vision that painted it in the first place. It's his vision that I paid for, and it's his vision, no matter how many times it changes, that I want to own.

      --
      So when is the Hawkeye movie coming out?
    7. Re:Everyone needs to pipe down... by Starsmore · · Score: 1
      It's my understanding that if an artist (artist in the sense of one who uses paint and a canvas to create) goes back to seriously alters his work, skewing it into something it completely wasn't, the community of art-loving people would consider said artist FUCKING CRAZY and the rest of the world would agree.

      Aside from the fscking boatload of money Lucas has raked in, what makes him any different?

      --
      "If Common Sense was so common, it wouldn't be such a valued trait."
  95. Maybe we will get Lucky.... by haplo21112 · · Score: 1

    ...and Lucas will Die soon...someone (his Kids maybe) will find the hidden bok of star wars ideas (which I believe was once refered to as "The Book of the Whillis)...sell the rights to make new Star Wars Movies...then the Job will get turned over to people that would know how to make a good Star Wars Movie( Kevin Smith, Joss Whedon, Spielbergh, the entire creative team of Stargate SG-1, etc), give us our once promised 7,8,9 that he has backed away from...

    --
    Power Corrupts,Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, leaving one person(group)in charge is absolutely corrupt.
  96. "There may not be a market" by Earlybird · · Score: 3, Interesting
    • AP: Why did you change your mind and decide to put the original three movies out on DVD now?

      Lucas: Just because the market has shifted so dramatically. A lot of people are getting very worried about piracy. That has really eaten dramatically into the sales. It really just came down to, there may not be a market when I wanted to bring it out, which was like, three years from now. So rather than just sit by and watch the whole thing fall apart, better to bring it out early and get it over with.

    Does this strike anyone else as incredibly short-sighted? Never mind that he's saying right out that the reason for putting out the DVDs are purely financial. But he also suspects that nobody will be making money on publishing movies in three years' time. He clearly doesn't care about putting out a physical box set for fans to cherish on their mantelpieces, before the time comes when publishing anything physical is no longer feasible: he's talking about money.

    1. Re:"There may not be a market" by Canadian+Idol · · Score: 0

      Never mind that he's saying right out that the reason for putting out the DVDs are purely financial.

      I think that sheds a lot of light on things. He didn't care about fans wanting a high-quality copy to replace aging VHS tapes... he just cared about possible lost revenue. Jabba the Hutt? Trade Federation? Hmmm... maybe inspiration was found quite close to home.

      --


      -
      My other .sig is a Mercury!
    2. Re:"There may not be a market" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I don't think he is talking about all movies in general. I think he just meant his movies specifically, which have dozens of bootleg editions on DVD out there already. The longer he dealyed keeping this particular high demand item out of the marketplace, the more bootlegs there would be.

      That argument silly though, because all bootlegs are based on older video copies (VHS and Laserdisc) and could never hope to match the quality of the set he is putting out now. There would still be demand for the "official" set even if every household had a crappy bootleg copy.

  97. Episodes 7-9 by TiggertheMad · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First off, my feeling is that there shouldn't be any episodes 7-9, simply because the story is told and finished at the end of the furry midget fest, er RTOJ. However there has been a lot of buzz about the possibility of more SW films.

    From the interview:
    Lucas: Ultimately, I'm going to probably move it into television and let other people take it. I'm sort of preserving the feature film part for what has happened and never go there again, but I can go off into various offshoots and things. You know, I've got offshoot novels, I've got offshoot comics. So it's very easy to say, "Well, OK, that's that genre, and I'll find a really talented person to take it and create it." Just like the comic books and the novels are somebody else's way of doing it. I don't mind that. Some of it might turn out to be pretty good. If I get the right people involved, it could be interesting.

    Translation: I want to be the only one who gets to make cannon (movies), but I might let others spin off side stuff. I don't think this is a bad thing, as it might delay SW becomming the steaming pile of poop that Star Trek has become.

    Here's my prediction: GL dies in another 10-20 years of a heart attack or something. GL's daughter wastes all the republic credits on fast cars and blow, and then in a effort to scrape up some more money, sells off the rights to a studio to make more films, merchandise, etc. One way or another, more SW WILL be made. It's just a question of when and by who.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  98. Terrible by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 1
    3 things come out of that interview.

    First, Lucas is only releasing the DVDs because he wants to release them before someone just takes VHS tapes, cleans them, and burns them to DVD.

    Second, Lucas cares nothing for his consumers. ZERO. NONE. NADA. As stated above, the only reason he is making this is to A. make money, and B. get HIS version out there before someone releases the real thing. He did nothing because of his consumers. In fact he somewhat happily states he ignores them. Honestly, that single interview makes me never want to purchase anything in any way related to star wars just for the sole purpose of never giving money to such an arrogant ass.

    At least he gives us a reprieve by saying he will be taking his crap to TV and leave the last 3 movies to someone else to do. We can only hope.

    In closing, I predict someone is going to take the VHS tapes, clean them up and sell pirated DVD's of the actual movie. And that they will be fairly successful because, despite lucas's understanding of economics, consumers vote with their money and they will vote for what they want not what they are given. Personally, I'd be happy to buy pirated DVDs of the original series as long as the money never see's Lucas's claws.

    --
    I do security
  99. Star Wars TV: Apprentice: Sith Lord by haplo21112 · · Score: 3, Funny

    18 Young Hopefulls are given a chance to work with the Palpatine, at the end of Each episode one is chosen as Unworthy...at which point he is electrocuted to death, or has throat crushed by Vader.

    --
    Power Corrupts,Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, leaving one person(group)in charge is absolutely corrupt.
  100. Re:Lucas puts them on DVD early because of...PIRAC by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    THX1138 is being re-made/re-released right now. Sith is just around the corner. Star Wars Battlegrounds and KOTOR2 and a whole slew of video games are hitting the market.

    The level of George Lucas hype is as high right now as it will ever be. In 3 years, Star Wars will be completely forgotten.

    That's why they're being released now.

    This guy blames everything on piracy. Last interview I read with him, he ranted about how Episode II didn't do as well as he hoped in the theatres, and of course - he blamed piracy, and threatened to completely scrap Episode III because "piracy" would just ruin it too.

    I mean, it couldn't possibly have anything to do with the movie sucking so bad that I can't even recall the plot with any clarity.

    All I remember is they turned Boba Fett from a really cool, cold calculating faceless bounty hunter, into a Spanish kid with a grudge against the Jedi. "My name is Inigo Montoy^H^H^H^Boba Fett! You keel my fathor! Prepare to die!" OK, I read somewhere that the actor was maori. Either way, he's just a stereotyped hot-blooded latin now.

    Should have left Boba alone. I could stomach everything else he did. I could deal with Jar Jar and the pod races. Greedo can shoot first all he wants. He could pencil in little furry boners on all the Ewoks, that's just fine.

    But he ruined Boba Fett. Unforgivable!

    The funny thing is, I can't recall seeing Ep II on any bittorrent sites or the other usual channels. It wasn't even good enough to be pirated far and wide.

    I see more episodes of Will and Grace for download on sites like suprnova than I do Star Wars stuff... That should speak volumes.

    Sorry George. You turned off most of the old fans, and failed to attact any newer younger ones to replace them.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  101. If Lucas was smart by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 1

    He'd "REMAKE" episode 1,2,3

    Think about it...

    www.geocities.com/James_Sager_PA

  102. The real horror of this is... by Skyshadow · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The real horror of this is that we are potentially facing an *extinction* of the real films. These "special editions" are already becoming the versions you see on TV and they're the only versions you can really buy anywhere. The original might exist someplace, but if you can't see it, it might as well not.

    Back when I was in college, I got the letterbox VHS versions (this is right before the first "special editions" were reissued) and my college ACM chapter had a fund-raiser where we showed the films on a big-screen TV with a big sound system and pizza and whatever.

    To my surprise, the main people who showed weren't students, but parents who were bringing their little kids to watch Star Wars for the first time. It was really cool to watch someone's first reaction to this stuff that a lot of us knew by heart.

    I have to wonder: Will my kids be able to see the real version of the films, or are they going to be stuck with these inferior versions? How long can my VHS versions last? I watched 'em again last month -- they're already showing wear.

    It's a cultural loss on the same level as if Wells had burned "Citizen Kane" after it got a few bad reviews. These are *the* defining movies of that generation.

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    1. Re:The real horror of this is... by benzapp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The real horror of this is that we are potentially facing an *extinction* of the real films.

      Is it really a horror?

      I mean, books and stories have been altered over time for thousands of years. Why should movies be this stagnant work of art?

      Maybe if you think of them as painting or statues... but still, I don't think its horrific.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    2. Re:The real horror of this is... by Gulik · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have to wonder: Will my kids be able to see the real version of the films, or are they going to be stuck with these inferior versions?

      That's one of the larger complaints I have about the refurbished Star Wars movies: in some sense, they're historical documents. They were revolutionary when they came out, and spawned a whole new direction in what a science fiction movie could look like.

      I of course have my own stylistic objections to Han not shooting first, and I might even be willing to float an argument that Lucas, by receiving a copyright on the movies, has likewise agreed to allow it to pass into the public domain some day (some day long after I'm dead by the look of things, but that's a whole 'nuther argument), and he shouldn't be doing his level best to make sure that the original movies are not available to anyone ever. But further, how about historians in the future? Film and art students? Anthropologists from the year 2525? Isn't it kind of sad that they'll never be able to see the actual film that caused a revolution in filmmaking?

    3. Re:The real horror of this is... by jedidiah · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Star Wars was a significant cultural phenomenon. It was also a significant turning point in the history of motion pictures. For those reasons alone, the ORIGINAL needs to be preserved for future academic study. Nevermind anything else.

      Culture provides the context of history.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    4. Re:The real horror of this is... by wertarbyte · · Score: 1

      I have to wonder: Will my kids be able to see the real version of the films, or are they going to be stuck with these inferior versions? How long can my VHS versions last? I watched 'em again last month -- they're already showing wear.

      Now playing on your favorite BitTorrent site: The real Star Wars, directly from Laserdisc into your dvd writer...at least, that's what I heard.

      --
      Life is just nature's way of keeping meat fresh.
    5. Re:The real horror of this is... by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 2, Funny

      In the original Odyssey, Polyphemus the Cyclops wasn't permanently blinded. But Homer realized that because of the prevailing blood-thirsty attitude of the times, it wouldn't sell. So he rewrote the more violent version and eradicated all references to the "nice" version.

      Sure there was a lot of outcry from his fans, but money talks. He said later that the technology he needed to write it the way he really wanted wasn't mature enough to get his strory just right. Plus Poseidon needed a real reason to get all pissed off.

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    6. Re:The real horror of this is... by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      Horror is probably an exaggeration, but it does seem like a loss to not preserve the original versions of films that have had such a strong influence over cinema for the last 25 years. Especially when the effort to do so is relatively minimal. Movies are different from painting of sculpture in that Lucas could produce his improvements without changing the originals, which would be pretty hard to do with the Mona Lisa or David.

    7. Re:The real horror of this is... by iopha · · Score: 1

      There are torrents of the original movies available, ripped from the laserdisc editions-- DVD quality. A friend of mine was doing brisk business selling DVDs of the original movies after he had acquired rips. Suprnova.org should have them, if you want to look.

      So add this to the list of useful things P2P does: preserves our cultural memory in the face of revisionism, which in these days is more and more of a threat....

    8. Re:The real horror of this is... by Dimensio · · Score: 1

      There are torrents of the original movies available, ripped from the laserdisc editions-- DVD quality.

      Er, if they were ripped from laserdisc, then they're laserdisc quality. The resolution may have been bumped up to DVD resolution, but the image quality of the movie itself will still be non-anamorphic laserdisc quality.

    9. Re:The real horror of this is... by m50d · · Score: 1

      No, because laserdisc is, at least theoretically, lossless if your equipment is good enough. It's an analog format even though it's optical. So DVD quality is lower than laserdisc quality, the movies have been sampled to DVD quality. Would you complain if this was a song and someone said "There are torrents of the original available, ripped from the vinyl editions - CD quality"? Because that's more or less an equivalent situation.

      --
      I am trolling
    10. Re:The real horror of this is... by Neuticle · · Score: 1

      Analog is not lossless, and there is a resolution limit to it, based on what basically amounts to bandwidth, e.g. a recording on cassette tape vs the studio master on 2" tape at 30 inches per second: more tape (bandwidth) means more resolution. Digital compression is not always low quality either, bandwith~quality, more or less the same as analog. I bet that if you encode a cassette tape with 512Kbps OGG or MP3, you won't notice a quality loss, since all the fidelity of cassette can fit into that space easily.

      A double sided 30cm CLV LD holds ~2 hours and there is a fixed amount of information there. DVDs have variable bit rate MPEG-2 and nearly 9GB on a double-layer disc. So the question is this: can the DVD hold all the LD data without compressing it to the point where fidelity and quality are lost?

      Now, I'm not sure offhand how good the starwars LD quality is, I've yet to see it. I do know that I've seen Super-bit dvds that use the highest bit-rate MPEG that will fit on the disc, and they look much better than regular editions: better colour and nearly absent digital artifacting. So assuming that these LDs were ripped by a skilled person with good kit and encoded in the highest possible bit rate, I think they could easily contain all the fidelity of the LD master. As the movies are all close to 2h, a double layer disc works out to 10Mbps, the max DVD allows. Even on a single layer, things should be OK at 5Mbps, which is better than most DVDs.

      Either way, Lucas still needs a good cock-punching for destroying a masterpiece. I just pretend that Ep I, II and III don't exist, and I pray that VII, VIII and IX don't get made while Lucas is around to screw them up too.

      --
      "Cheeze it!" - Bender
    11. Re:The real horror of this is... by PoL0 · · Score: 1

      You'll never get positive moderation with such a post. This is /., news for NERDS...

      You know what? I think you are a trekkie!!

    12. Re:The real horror of this is... by benzapp · · Score: 1

      Why would I give a fuck about moderation? Nothing would make me happier than for this very post to be modded negative-fucking-five

      Take it DOWN, DOWN TO CHINATOWN!!!

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    13. Re:The real horror of this is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You very clearly don't know what the FUCK you are talking about.

    14. Re:The real horror of this is... by m50d · · Score: 1

      Oh really? Then correct me. Come on, I'm willing to learn if I really have got it wrong.

      --
      I am trolling
    15. Re:The real horror of this is... by m50d · · Score: 1

      But the only limit on analog bandwidth is the point at which the signal gets lost in the noise. Say for a moment that pits/flats are 1mm wide and 0-1mm deep. Now if you have a digital disc, you can put 1000 bits in 1m of track - each will be 0mm or 1mm deep. If you have an analog disc, you can put as much data as you want in 1m of track, provided your equipment is good enough. Want to put 8000 bits in 1m of track? Group them in 8s, to give you 1000 values from 0-255. Then if one of those values is 98, make the corresponding patch on the disc 98/256mm deep. Want to put 16000 bits in 1m of track? Group them in 16s, then make patches of disc 3482/65535mm deep etc. The only way this falls apart is when your equipment isn't good enough to tell the difference between 3482/65535mm deep and 3483/65535mm deep. So the analog recording is lossless as long as your equipment is good enough. Now I'm not saying that the star wars LDs are better than DVD quality, I haven't seen them either. I'm just saying LDs can be better quality than DVD, provided you have the right equipment, clean-room environment etc. Because they're analog, and that means with good enough equipment they're lossless.

      --
      I am trolling
    16. Re:The real horror of this is... by Neuticle · · Score: 1

      Yeah, You're right about analog "bandwith" being limited only by the precision of your equipment, but remember that LD disks were only mastered with so much fidelity, and that S/N ratio is fixed. I don't know the LD spec well enough to know the S/N ratio of the analog video track, but since it's similar in age to CD tech, I'm guessing that it's in the mid to upper 90s. Good, possibly better than DVD, but I don't think it includes all of the original 35mm resolution, so something has been "lost"

      Was it Archimedese who said "give me a lever long enough and I will move the Earth"? Same principle here. Analog is only truly lossless when you have infinite precision in your recording and reading equipment. Even then, at some point the precision of recorded data is going to hit atomic limits, and to increase fidelity beyond that you have to increase the upper size limit of data blocks, which in turn increases the amount of media/second. Digital can also be truly lossless with infinite Mbps. Neither option is feasible.

      Not to knock on analogue stuff though, I like it just fine for my amplifiers and music, but I realize that it has it's limits and drawbacks.

      --
      "Cheeze it!" - Bender
  103. they have a word for it now by WormholeFiend · · Score: 3, Funny

    I admit that the sand pit in Jedi did look way too much like a really nasty vagina until Lucas put in the appendage with the beak, so that's fixed.

    It's called vaginoplasty and it's becoming increasingly fashionable these days...

    1. Re:they have a word for it now by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      No it's called Vagina Dentata and Freud's been out of fashion for quite some time.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    2. Re:they have a word for it now by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      No it's called Vagina Dentata and Freud's been out of fashion for quite some time.

      Saw that in a japanese animé once, scared the shit out of me.
      From what it said on the box, I was looking forward to some standard demon-hunting sci-fi action. Boy did I not expect clashing cunt-fangs.

      So its not a common fear, but its a very effective horror element.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  104. Alright... by xmutex · · Score: 1

    Whose got the rocks?

    --

    jack's bicycle is music to my ears
  105. Obligatory Monty Python reference by dapyx · · Score: 1, Funny
    where does the line to throw rocks at him start? do i need a ticket?

    Aah, all right. I'll have, uh, two with points and... a big flat one.

    --
    I'm sorry, the number you have dialed is an imaginary number. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and dial again.
  106. The direction by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 1
    They also discuss the future of the franchise and the direction he intends to take it.

    The phrase we are looking for is Down the pan...

  107. My humble suggestion for Lucas by scotay · · Score: 1

    These started showing up on Usenet over the past couple of days. Despite being downsampled to fit on a dvdr, these prints look WONDERFUL. Better than anything we've seen in pervious editions with cool commentary tracks. Well worth buying if you ask me, but could have been so much better.

    Now as to what Lucas should have done, I would point to the Alien re-release. Not only do we get commentary, but we get the original theatrical release, a director's cut, and a menu option to activate scene markers. You can see 'deleted scene' or 'added scene' as the movie plays. You make the choices and are provided the information to enjoy as entertainment or study as a film student. This was what DVD was supposed to be all about in addition to better visuals.

    You can see how lame and arrogant Lucas is. He says he is releasing these now because in 3 years pirates will have apparently taken over the world. What is he thinking?

    Lucas: Just because the market has shifted so dramatically. A lot of people are getting very worried about piracy. That has really eaten dramatically into the sales. It really just came down to, there may not be a market when I wanted to bring it out, which was like, three years from now. So rather than just sit by and watch the whole thing fall apart, better to bring it out early and get it over with.

  108. I'm sorry people by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1, Troll


    I like my Star Wars as much as the next geek. I love it even but I have to say that George Lucas is so full of stinking shit that it's almost unbelievable.

    His whole pompous BS about why he made Star Wars in the first place just grows every year that passes. He says he's bringing them out now on DVD because of piracy? Please. He's bringing them out now on DVD because he's afraid that based on his original plan he won't get the fat DVD version payday. He's afraid that a new format will be coming into play and he'll have missed the chance to fuck his fans out of their cash for the DVD's.

    Launching into the piracy argument tells me that he's not just full of shit. He's full of shit AND he thinks the rest of us are too stupid to see it.

    I like Star Wars but fuck George Lucas. Fuck him in his stupid ass.

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    1. Re: I'm sorry people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Troll? WTF? Did I piss of some George Lucas fanbitch who's offended that someone can see through the Master of Myth's bullshit? Well so fucking what. If the retard who modded this down would take his lips of Lucas cock for a moment, read the article, and then ask his parents to explain it to him then there'd be some justice here.

      Typical Slashdot moderating. I shouldn't expect better but like the fool I am I continue to.

    2. Re: I'm sorry people by Zed2K · · Score: 1

      In other words, he has a product that he knows brainless fans will buy over and over again so he moves up his timetable to release it sooner to take in the money from the sales.

      Hmmm...who really is the idiot? The moron fans who bitch and moan everyday and then still buy the 18million different versions or Lucas who puts out the product that you can choose to buy if you want?

  109. Re:to me, it doesn't really exist anymore. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to me, it doesn't really exist anymore. :O

    Oh cool, that means he doesnt recognize it.

    Does anyone have a torrent for the originals? I mean, it doesnt exist to him anymore, so why does he care if we download it?

  110. So THAT'S what Roger Waters was singing 'bout by The+I+Shing · · Score: 1

    In his song "The Powers That Be" from Radio K.A.O.S....

    They like order, make-up, lime light power
    Game shows, rodeos, star wars, TV


    There you go, Star Wars TV! He was singing about George Lucas! And if you see them come, you better run!

    --
    You are in error. No-one is screaming. Thank you for your cooperation.
  111. The Shooting First Issue by CGP314 · · Score: 1

    I'm not going to spend the, we're talking millions of dollars here, the money and the time to refurbish that, because to me, it doesn't really exist anymore. It's like this is the movie I wanted it to be, and I'm sorry you saw half a completed film and fell in love with it

    So what, you're trying to tell me you wanted Greedo to shoot first, but that you were unable to do so 30 years ago?


    -Colin

    1. Re:The Shooting First Issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if historians in the future will rewrite history so that Iraq fires first...

  112. Ackbar vs. Binks by Tackhead · · Score: 1

    Jar Jar Binks: ITSA BESA TRAP!
    Ackbar: I knew I should have joined the Empire when they took over my homeworld.

  113. I'm sorry... Rant here by Tropaios · · Score: 2

    Fuck you George... Fuck you you God-Damned hollywood-grassfucker... I hate you and I hope you die of some really bad VD that has yet to be discovered. You piece of shit money-grubbing whore.

    Talking about the films being unfinished before and just needing you to throw millions of dollars at them and your fancy special effects computers to churn away on them. I call bullshit.

    Did you not have enough money in 1976 to make Greedo shoot first, was the technology not available at the time, was that it?

    George: Harrison, sorry, um yeah, well see here's the thing, we just don't have enough laser special effects to have Greedo shoot at you first so we'll just have to have you kill him in cold blood.

    Harrison: But won't that make my character an "anti-hero"?

    George: Yeah, I'm really sorry about that. I solemly swear to fix it in post-production 20 years later restoring bland noble virtue to your white hat wearing space cowboy.

    Harrison: Um, okay George.

    There is a place for you in Hell you pedantic fuck, I hate you.

  114. What Does "Han Shoots First" Mean? by Wandering+Wombat · · Score: 1

    Seriously...

    --
    I like to place meaningful quotes in my sig, so people will know that I know what meaningful quotes are.
    1. Re:What Does "Han Shoots First" Mean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      In the Cantina scene, in the original version, Han Solo whacks the dumbass bounty hunter Greedo with a pre-emptive shot from beneath the table, thus cementing in everyones eyes his total badassness.

      In the "enhanced" version, Greedo shoots first, apparently unable to hit a target at absurdly close range, and Han "returns fire" killing him in "self-defense", and cementing him in our minds as a dumbass, though an insanely lucky one, who was apparantly smart enough to have his hand on his blaster, but dumb enough not to use it proactively against an obvious treacherous slimeball.

    2. Re:What Does "Han Shoots First" Mean? by RevAaron · · Score: 0, Troll

      Why did you bother to read this thread? I mean, it's obvious that Star Wars means nothing to you, so why waste the time?

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    3. Re:What Does "Han Shoots First" Mean? by Wandering+Wombat · · Score: 5, Informative

      I read the thread because I love Star Wars. Because I love Star Wars, I haven't seen the Special Edition. Because I haven't seen the Special Edition, this comment made no sense to me. Because this comment made no sense to me, I posted for clarification. Because I posted for clarification, you feel the need to belittle me because I know less than you. Congratulations.

      --
      I like to place meaningful quotes in my sig, so people will know that I know what meaningful quotes are.
    4. Re:What Does "Han Shoots First" Mean? by PedanticSpellingTrol · · Score: 2, Funny
      Well if you truly love Star Wars, to the point that you've refused to see Special Edition, I can only encourage you to cease your inquiries into this matter before you learn the truth and kill yourself. If you insist though, I've encoded the horrible horrible answer below in ROT-1.

      Mvdbt dibohfe uif dboujob tdfof tp uibu hsffep, uif cpvouz ivoufs uibo Ibo xbtufe xjuipvu b tfdpoe uipvhiu gjsfe gjstu.

    5. Re:What Does "Han Shoots First" Mean? by Wandering+Wombat · · Score: 1
      Well, adding special effects for the sake of adding special effects seems to detract from the magic of a movie. Also, I've never had enough money to go out and buy said Special Edition, so thats another reason why I haven't seen it. Finally, how can King Lucas possibly rationalize not being able to show that part of the story until now when "technology gives him the control he needed"?

      I'll stick with the original Star Wars... "Hidden Fortress" by Akira Kurosawa.

      --
      I like to place meaningful quotes in my sig, so people will know that I know what meaningful quotes are.
    6. Re:What Does "Han Shoots First" Mean? by ghost_world · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      If you had RTFA, you would already know that King George hated the originals because he couldn't do what he "really wanted" with them, and spent 8 years apologising to anyone who would listen to his ramblings.

      This is one of those cases where not having the proper tools, or sufficient time, to do the job created something better than it would have otherwise been.

      BTW: Georgie doesn't give a rat's ass what you, a fan, thinks.

    7. Re:What Does "Han Shoots First" Mean? by Wandering+Wombat · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If you had RTFP, you'd know you missed the point.

      He couldnt do what he wanted? How could he POSSIBLY not have the tools to add three seconds where Greedo gets a shot off, given what he had done for the rest of the movie?

      --
      I like to place meaningful quotes in my sig, so people will know that I know what meaningful quotes are.
    8. Re:What Does "Han Shoots First" Mean? by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      He's answer is really just to cover up the fact that the re-releases were not as well accepted as the originals and that his fundamental changes were ultimately crap.

      The whole "Han shot first" thing is a great example, because it's not like he couldn't have made Greedo shoot first, or even at the same time... it's not an unfinished work - it's that he can't make up his freaking mind.

      I don't hear people complaining much about digitally enhancing the movie - taking out the Tie Fighter mattes and so forth, but his excuse is just lame... despite everything everyone has said to the contrary, he still thinks people only care about special effects.

      People might go see the movie for the effects, but people will never think it's a great movie because of them.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    9. Re:What Does "Han Shoots First" Mean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It means Lucas has turned into a Liberal weenie...

    10. Re:What Does "Han Shoots First" Mean? by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
      In the Cantina scene, in the original version, Han Solo whacks the dumbass bounty hunter Greedo with a pre-emptive shot from beneath the table, thus cementing in everyones eyes his total badassness.
      That badassness? Solo simply shoots Greedo when he has a chance, since he knows very well that if he doesn't, he's toast.

      The badass there is Greedo who wants the bounty Jabba has put on Solo.

    11. Re:What Does "Han Shoots First" Mean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad they never did discover any weapons of mass destruction on Greedo. And Han didn't stick around to make sure the cantina didn't fall into total chaos. He paid for it later when the Hutt terrorist organization captured him and threatened to feed him to a pit of tentacles with the situation being that the pit would slowly eat him beyond him natural lifespan.

      Any justice for Boba Fett in the remakes? Did Boba escape the pit? Was Luke's lightsabre actually a bunch of silly string? Did everyone who died stand up during the credits and say "Look kids, its just a movie!" Did the ghost of Akira Kurosawa appear and claim the idea of Star Wars? Would any of this actually have happened had they decided to not follow the yellow brick road? Damn, Toto was a tad bit big and ugly in this remake!!

    12. Re:What Does "Han Shoots First" Mean? by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      I'm glad someone had the brains to figure out that what I said was meant as a joke- and to follow up on it. :)

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    13. Re:What Does "Han Shoots First" Mean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first time I saw Episode 4 was when I bought the remastered versions. I remember thinking it was pretty cool how Han seemingly dodged the shot when Greedo fired at him.

    14. Re:What Does "Han Shoots First" Mean? by MustardMan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Take off every SIG

      For great justice.

      You know, the really ironic part of this post is that not long ago I replied to someone who was flaming me, because I cracked on someone for quoting Dave Chappelle, while my own SIG is in fact a quote of a TV show. So now I'm a double-hypocrite in one article for quoting the VERY over-used 'all your base' joke. I even did an "in soviet russia joke" recently. I hope I get flamed for it.

    15. Re:What Does "Han Shoots First" Mean? by SamSeaborn · · Score: 1
      Han Solo whacks the dumbass bounty hunter Greedo with a pre-emptive shot from beneath the table, thus cementing in everyones eyes his total badassness.

      You elequently crystalized the problem, bravo!

      The wild-west-justice of it is once your opponent draws his pistol you can shoot him in self-defense. Period. There's a generation of western pictures to use as precedent.

      Greedo had his pistol drawn, threatened to kill him ("I've been looking forward to this for a long time"). Han shot him in self-defense. This is obviously what Lucas originally intended despite what he claims now.

      I'm all for director's cuts but this sort of revisionist film making makes me retch.

      Sam

    16. Re:What Does "Han Shoots First" Mean? by blasterz · · Score: 1

      Rocks are hard. Water is wet.

      --
      partially regruntled codemonkey bloomington, illinois
    17. Re:What Does "Han Shoots First" Mean? by Destoo · · Score: 1

      Ok. I've just watched Hidden Fortress.

      There's a princess, a few shady characters and that's about it.

      The only reason that the movie was an inspiration to Lucas (or so he says) was that the story is seen from the eyes of two main characters who play minor roles. And that's how the tale is told. Just like 3P0 and D2 are the "point of view" of A new hope.

      That movie rocked, btw.
      Is it just me or most female "Characters" in chinese movies have annoying voices? (princess, leaders, important figures)
      example: Jade King in New Dragon Gate Inn and Princess Yukihime in Hidden Fortress.

      --
      Nouvelles de jeux et technologies en français. TC
    18. Re:What Does "Han Shoots First" Mean? by Destoo · · Score: 1

      (got the quote)

      In an interview for the Criterion collection DVD, George Lucas states that while this film is a story a story about a princess and her protectors that this is not the element inspired Star Wars. Lucas states the inspiration comes from the telling of the story through the eyes of two smaller roles. In Hidden Fortress it is the two thieves, in Star Wars it is C3PO and R2D2.
      imdb

      --
      Nouvelles de jeux et technologies en français. TC
  115. what a terrible reason by marshmeli · · Score: 0

    AP: Why did you change your mind and decide to put the original three movies out on DVD now?

    Lucas: Just because the market has shifted so dramatically. A lot of people are getting very worried about piracy. That has really eaten dramatically into the sales. It really just came down to, there may not be a market when I wanted to bring it out, which was like, three years from now. So rather than just sit by and watch the whole thing fall apart, better to bring it out early and get it over with.


    To make more money... come on George, you know poeople would buy them still if they were another 3 years... he just did this so im 5 year he can sell them again as HD DVD or Blue Ray discs...

    and he doesnt want to spend the money (millions, i dont think so) to release the original ones on DVd, why not?
    All we want is the original untouched trilogy on a disc instead of tape, so we can move to chapters and stuff, i dont want special features, hell i dont even need an in-depth menu...

  116. Ever hear of kurosawa? by lordDukkha · · Score: 1

    Just wanted to know why no mention of Hidden Fortress? I have a Japanese printing of the artwork for Ran, and on the obi Lucas thanks Kurosawa for the inspiration for Star Wars.

  117. Re:but what happens when Han wlaks over jabbas tai by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    in the orig han walked around a CGI jabba but if taking to be real it would seem han is walking straight THROUGH jabba the huts tail!

    What are you talking about? Did they even have CGI in 1977? It was all models and latex and puppets!

    The scene wasn't even in the original version, and Jabba was portrayed as a human. No tail at all, and left on the cutting room floor.

    You're remembering TV specials about the restoration of Star Wars and the creation of the CGI Jabba and mistakenly ascribing it to the original version.

    This is one of the problems with these revised versions: people don't remember the original accurately anymore. Enough repetition of "Han shoots first!" and people forget that originally only Han shot!

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  118. another thing by marshmeli · · Score: 0

    AP: After "Episode III," will you ever revisit "Star Wars"?

    Lucas: Ultimately, I'm going to probably move it into television and let other people take it. I'm sort of preserving the feature film part for what has happened and never go there again, but I can go off into various offshoots and things. You know, I've got offshoot novels, I've got offshoot comics. So it's very easy to say, "Well, OK, that's that genre, and I'll find a really talented person to take it and create it." Just like the comic books and the novels are somebody else's way of doing it. I don't mind that. Some of it might turn out to be pretty good. If I get the right people involved, it could be interesting.


    this is at least good news, maybe the final 3 will be saved by new people in charge of it...

  119. The Good News is by BayBlade · · Score: 1
    You can download a torrent of the laserdisc version, burn your own DVD (or keep it on your desktop and watch it there) of it and not feel an ounce of guilt about pirating something which "does not exist"
    Torrent here

    If Lucas can't be bothered to take 20 minutes out of his day and do this so I can pay him, I'm just not going to pay him.

    --

    The key difference between a Programmer and a Senior Programmer is that one of them is Mexican.

  120. I'm calling shenanigans by mckwant · · Score: 1

    You know, he almost had me with this one, but you can't tell me that there was much more involved in having Greedo shoot first. It'd be what, another flashpot and some smoke, and maybe some debris falling out of the hole in the wall where he (inexplicably) missed Han?

    It's NOT the original vision. The Jabba scene, and all the extraneous junk wandering around the spaceport, I don't care about, but this one really sits in my craw.

    --
    ceci n'est pas un sig.
    1. Re:I'm calling shenanigans by blighter · · Score: 1
      My thoughts exactly.

      If the changes are solely meant to 'complete' the movies, why make a change like that? It would have been no more difficult in the original filming to have Greedo shoot first.

    2. Re:I'm calling shenanigans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice south park reference (shenanigans), if that's what's you're referring to.

  121. Television by baruz · · Score: 1
    Ultimately, I'm going to probably move it into television and let other people take it.
    ...thus taking the franchise from the crapper to the sewer.

    Yay!

    --
    He was a verray parfit gentil knight.
  122. One word, IDIOT by Nuge · · Score: 1

    Why does this interview remind me so much of a Bush interview? I don't know, but one thing is for sure, Lucas is a damn money WH0RE!

    1. Re:One word, IDIOT by Nuge · · Score: 1

      Oh, I just remembered why Lucas reminds me of Bush - Doesn't listen to anyone but himself - Blatently lies - Cares only about money

    2. Re:One word, IDIOT by Zed2K · · Score: 1

      Lucas seems like a pure movie maker. His job is to make movies that make money. He isn't in the business to make people happy so why the hell should he give a damn what you or anyone else thinks about his movies?

      This is his job and he's doing his job.

      What is truely an idiot is something bringing Bush into a thread about Lucas and Star Wars. Give it a rest already.

    3. Re:One word, IDIOT by Nuge · · Score: 1

      aaahhh, poor neocon. I can't help it that as I read the interview it reminded me Bush. And I know Lucas is a movie maker and not the president, but the way he talked and the answers he gave STILL REMINDED ME OF BUSH!

    4. Re:One word, IDIOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus, can someone just REMOVE that stupid term once and for all?? NEOCON??? Give me a frigging break.

  123. With all these childhood rapings... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just thought I'd post a number for a rape crisis center.

    1-800-DEAL-WITH-IT

  124. Harrison's Opinion by uberdave · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Lately I've been wondering what Harrison Ford's opinion on this whole Han/Greedo shoots first controversy is. Anybody know?

    1. Re:Harrison's Opinion by Thud457 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, I saw him speak at our college commencement. His comment was : "It's just a movie. Get a life!"

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    2. Re:Harrison's Opinion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'd ask him, but he'd probably shoot first...

  125. they stopped being his movies... by rbird76 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...when he released them.

    When you make a movie, you make it not only for yourself but for the people who will want to see them. People go to movies to enjoy themselves, and to take home a part of the world that the people who made it bequeathed to them. Star Wars did that and was wildly successful; many, many people have internalized the world of Star Wars, built on to it, and fitted themselves into it. That's why, even twenty years later, the movies are still popular and still worth talking about.

    By changing the movies, Lucas is appropriating not only his work but that of the people who have watched and internalized his world. If you want a movie which is alterable to your changing desires, don't release it. Once it's released, the movie is no longer yours exclusively - not quite the people's who made it, not quite the people who watched and enjoyed it.

    Complaints about people's complaints on the alterations is like the complaints of stars about their fame. Some of fame's consequences are ridiculous, but they knew that when they set out to get there. Lucas set out to make a popular movie - and popular movies become as much the public's as the people who made them. If he wanted a private vision, then he should have left it there. I am glad that he didn't, but I am not suprised at the backlash - when you play with people's cherished memories, you are going to make life hard for a lot of people.

    1. Re:they stopped being his movies... by winwar · · Score: 1

      No, they stop being his movies when he sells the rights to them....

      So you saw a version of them in the theater and like it better than the new version. So what? Then remember the old version.

      Yes, they have entered the pop culture. I grew up with the movies. But I could care less if he revises them. Pop culture changes. I still have my memories.

      Finally, if Star Wars has created "cherished memories" which will "make life hard for a lot of people" if new versions are released, then many people have serious problems....

  126. Re:I'm sorry... Rant here by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

    You nailed it man. On top of everything else he also assumes that everyone else is so fucking stupid that they won't see right through his shit.

    I have no mod points today or you would certainly have one.

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
  127. Edited to Suit My Nefarious Purposes by kkrista · · Score: 1

    AP: Do you pay much attention to fan reactions to your choices?

    Lucas: Not really.

  128. From the article ... Lucas' "tough love" to fans by dcarey · · Score: 1
    AP: Why not release both the originals and special editions on DVD?

    Lucas: The special edition, that's the one I wanted out there. The other movie, it's on VHS, if anybody wants it. ... I'm not going to spend the, we're talking millions of dollars here, the money and the time to refurbish that, because to me, it doesn't really exist anymore. It's like this is the movie I wanted it to be, and I'm sorry you saw half a completed film and fell in love with it. But I want it to be the way I want it to be. I'm the one who has to take responsibility for it. I'm the one who has to have everybody throw rocks at me all the time, so at least if they're going to throw rocks at me, they're going to throw rocks at me for something I love rather than something I think is not very good, or at least something I think is not finished.



    As an amateur recording artist I can vouch for works of art never being done, but man, where do you draw the line on that one? Is he going to change his mind 20 years from now and suddenly declare the old DVDS the 'wrong version' and redo the redone versions to fit his ideas at the moment?


    Ok I know he had grand designs of what the film should have been like 20 years ago, but really how can you say you know exactly what you want when the technology does not exist yet (or at least did not in 1977)? When does it end?


    Should we be sorry we fell in love with a half completed film as well?

    --

    -- (Score:i , Imaginary)

  129. Lucas Timeline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Star Wars: still has the film school mindset, lets do "Hidden Fortress" set in space.

    Empire Strikes Back: Control freak syndrome settling in, my money so I do it my way. Combined with the youth and attitude that comes from being in the up and coming generation of filmmakers at the time. Great, dark movie with the focus being on the characters and atmosphere.

    Return of the Jedi: How many millions did we make on action figures? Maybe we should toss some more stuff in there for the kids. Why did I ever look up to that Solo character?

    Special Editions: I need a showcase for all the SFX stuff my company can do. And more cash. In the happy land of my dreams it is a kinder gentler place where the hero never shoots first. No its not aging, I always felt that way.

    Episode 1: The kids are gonna love this. Maybe I should do all the dialogue myself. Computer gfx are neat.

    Episode 2: Hmm. Maybe Jar Jar should've been an Ewok. Ah well, now for the uplifting romance. Should be a breeze to write. I'm George Lucas after all. See, I got a standing ovation at the end of the love scene. No, thats not sarcasm. I'm George Lucas. Please save my movie Yoda.

    Trilogy DVDs: Almost 60% there to my original vision. Oh the wonders of computers. Chewbacca your days are numbered.

    Episode 3: Ahh Anakin betrays his master cuts off the rattail and murders hundreds of Jedi delivering the universe into the grips of the evil Empire. I sure had a twisted imagination when I was young. Wonder how I'm going to sell this to kids. Maybe add some Ewoks.

    1. Re:Lucas Timeline by inkswamp · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Return of the Jedi: How many millions did we make on action figures? Maybe we should toss some more stuff in there for the kids. Why did I ever look up to that Solo character? [...] Maybe add some Ewoks.

      Christ, the cynicism from you "Star Wars fans" is just overwhelming sometimes. If I got anything out of my enjoyment of the Star Wars films, it was that being cynical doesn't get you anywhere.

      Lucas explained the Ewoks and it had nothing to do with marketing to children. He stated around the time of Jedi's release that in the back story, there is a segment where Wookies outsmart the early imperial forces on their home planet and he had this great vision of them carrying out low-tech but clever attacks against these high-tech mechanized threats from the newly-forming Empire. He didn't think he'd ever get a chance to film that and thought Jedi's Endor scenes would be a good chance to introduce some characters and situations where that could happen. He wanted them to be Wookie-like so his solution was to shrink the Wookies and turn them into another race: the Ewoks.

      As it turns out, we're likely going to get to see his Wookie battle against the Empire in the next film. Of course, people like you will find every reason in the world to claim that it sucks and you'll rush home to throw on something by the Cure so you can nurse your injured childhood. The rest of us whose sphincter muscles still function normally will have a blast, enjoying it the same way we enjoyed the originals, warts and all.

      --
      --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
    2. Re:Lucas Timeline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Christ, the cynicism from you "Star Wars fans" is just overwhelming sometimes. If I got anything out of my enjoyment of the Star Wars films, it was that being cynical doesn't get you anywhere."

      If anything the failure in the Star Wars series is getting rid of the cynicism in favor of the earnestness and mysticism that its full of now. Cynicism makes up a huge part of what makes the characters and movies entertaining.

      "Lucas explained the Ewoks and it had nothing to do with marketing to children. He stated around the time of Jedi's release that in the back story, there is a segment where Wookies outsmart the early imperial forces on their home planet and he had this great vision of them carrying out low-tech but clever attacks against these high-tech mechanized threats from the newly-forming Empire. He didn't think he'd ever get a chance to film that and thought Jedi's Endor scenes would be a good chance to introduce some characters and situations where that could happen. He wanted them to be Wookie-like so his solution was to shrink the Wookies and turn them into another race: the Ewoks. "

      I look forward to seeing the band of cute little Wookie children who shepherd R2D2 and C3PO to safety in the next movie.

    3. Re:Lucas Timeline by cybpunks3 · · Score: 1

      Maybe in Episode III there will be carbombing and imperials' charred bodies being dragged through the streets. That will play well in the US.

  130. Well that's OK then by ShootThemLater · · Score: 1
    As Lucas won't include the originals because "to me, it doesn't really exist anymore", that means he won't be able to release them separately in a few years to maximise his $$$$ income.

    Right? Right??

  131. Where he's taking it ... by evslin · · Score: 1

    ... how about to the shelf, where it can rest in peace? Episodes 1 and 2 have had just about the same effect on the original movies as DS9/Voyager/Enterprise have had on Star Trek. He's ruining something that was just fine the way it was.

  132. Respect Lucaus for doing his own thing. by helfon1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I give Lucas credit for doing his own thing. Don't think any of this Lucas bashing is new he took heat for Jedi and the ewoks being too cute(think jar jar esque with less media hate).

    Look at his early scripts, Luke Starkiller? What George Lucas has always written has been cheesy in the way of
    "And I'll do it in that mode from the 1930s Saturday matinee serials, using kind of 1930s and '40s sensibilities, and I'll base it on sort of mythological motifs and icons"

    He's been saying that as long as I've been paying attention. I think it's a safe bet that he wanted to make the first movies even cheesier except for studio executives forcing him to bring it back to the mainstream. He was young and had to do what the studio told him, not having the clout or finances to do otherwise.

    I think he is re-releasing THX-1138 in part to say "The shit I did before star wars was freaking wacky and the fact that you happened to like the original trilogy was luck"

    He is producing art and just because it's not the hollywood standard sun glasses cool doesn't mean it's any less as a work. These are his ideas and I respect him for not caving to popular opinion and doing it how he wants. All that being said I think Han shoots first ;)

  133. Tolkien did the same thing by inkswamp · · Score: 1
    People who are busy cursing Lucas for his supposed pretense that "the film is never finished" should look to other artists. For example, JRR Tolkien went back and rewrote parts of The Hobbit to fit The Lord of the Rings. Originally, the ring wasn't intended to be anything special beyond a plot device to help Bilbo get through various dangers later in the story. Tolkien had to go back and rewrite and edit parts of the original version of The Hobbit so it made sense in the context of LOTR.

    Would anyone at this stage still argue that the original version of The Hobbit was the only real version, was the superior version and that Tolkien screwed everything up by changing it? After all, that's the version the original readers of the epic fell in love with, right?

    --
    --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
    1. Re:Tolkien did the same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      You do realize that The Hobbit was written and printed before 1938, and that the Lord of the Rings wasn't finished until the 1950's right?

    2. Re:Tolkien did the same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He revised his texts. There are several versions of some of the books in the Silmarilion, but these were only released posthumously by his children - as an insight into the Tolkein world, but also as a cashin I don't doubt. Revising drafts is normal before release.

      The point was, he was striving for a good story BEFORE releasing it. And Tolkein wasn't producing crap like Lucas is. No comparison.

    3. Re:Tolkien did the same thing by syrinx · · Score: 2

      You do realize that The Hobbit was written and printed before 1938, and that the Lord of the Rings wasn't finished until the 1950's right?

      That's what the OP is saying.. then Tolkien rewrote the Riddles in the Dark chapter of the Hobbit, even though it had been published over a decade earlier. This is no secret, it's in the LOTR Foreward.

      Mod parent down -1, Stupid.

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    4. Re:Tolkien did the same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I realize that but the Lord of the Rings was not finished when he did revise Riddles in the Dark, also, if you really want to get technical, the Silmarillion is his FIRST book for this whole world, and the Hobbit and LOTR were offshoots from that. Also, we don't see "LOTR special print edition" where Tolkien decides that it is better to have Frodo, Sam, and Gollum all do a dance as they are fighting over the ring in Mount Doom do you....

    5. Re:Tolkien did the same thing by inkswamp · · Score: 1
      What's even worse is that Tolkien did a poor job of making his edits fit the tone of the book, exactly what people gripe about Lucas failing to do with his changes (although it looks like he's smoothed some of that out with the DVD, the redoing of the CG Jabba for example.) If you read The Hobbit, you can't help but notice that Riddles chapter takes on a sudden and noticeable shift in the tone of the writing. It switched gears somewhat awkwardly from what sounds like a children's book to a very dark and grim chapter, just like it was part of LOTR.

      Frankly, I don't have a problem with artists doing this kind of thing. I would ding Lucas a bit for refusing to release the original versions as well, if not just for the historical value, but as others have pointed out, those are readily available from other sources, both legal and otherwise.

      Perhaps what might redeem Lucas in the eyes of the SW community would be a lifting of the copyrights on the originals maybe a year or so after the DVDs have come out. You know, Lucas could give his blessing for P2P networks to exchange copies of the originals, for fans to burn their own DVDs of those, etc.

      I can't imagine he'd be able to do that with all the legal entanglements it likely involves, but it would be a very cool move.

      --
      --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
  134. Re:Q: Do you believe that consistency is important by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lucas: I'm like Roddenberry, aren't I, fans? Aren't I? Please? Please make me like Gene, please? Attach my fucking name to everything Star Wars related so I will live on after my death with everything "based" on a pulp movie I put out in the 70s. Please? Will you? Pretty please with sugar on it?

  135. What do I care? by fatcatman · · Score: 1

    I downloaded laserdisc rips of the originals. As good as you can get quality wise without the bullshit changes.

  136. Missing Question: What about THX-1138 by Mad+Bad+Rabbit · · Score: 1

    AP: So, when are you going to remake THX-1138 with the
    violence taken out, and with added furry muppets?

    Lucas: I am hoping to get to that sometime this decade.
    There will be many other changes too: better SFX
    during the tunnel chase scenes; and the drab white
    backgrounds will be digitally replaced with more
    colorful ones. You know, I originally wanted the
    setting to be brightly colored, but we just didn't
    have the paint and wallpaper technology back then.

    --
    >;k
  137. Wrong Kurosawa film by Tassach · · Score: 1
    The Magnificant Seven was a rip-off of the Kurosawa film The Seven Samurai, set in the Wild West instead of Medieval Japan.

    Star Wars was a rip-off of the Kurosawa film The Hidden Fortress, set in a galaxy far far away instead of Midieval Japan.

    --
    Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    1. Re:Wrong Kurosawa film by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Magnificant Seven was a rip-off of the Kurosawa film The Seven Samurai, set in the Wild West instead of Medieval Japan.
      Star Wars was a rip-off of the Kurosawa film The Hidden Fortress, set in a galaxy far far away instead of Midieval Japan.


      I don't think the comparison is quite apt. IMHO, Star Wars while borrowing HEAVILY from Hidden Fortress, it wasn't as close a of a copy as The Magnificent Seven of The Seven Samurai. In terms of plot line, I mean.

      Of course this works both ways, Kurosawa said his some of his samurai movies were inspired the by western (as in "cowboy") litiary genre. He felt the eras in the two countries histories were in many ways similar. So he used similar plot devices and characters. Also Throne of Blood was intended by Kurosawa to pay homage to Shakespeare's Macbeth, but with an asian setting.

      I guess what I am trying to say is that with over 3000 years of written fiction (not to mention oral stories), it is REALLY not to be imitate something that someone did before. Of course, there are always lazy hacks who copy others because they don't have the talent or energy to even try to be orignal, but that doesn't mean their aren't legitimate deriviated works.

      As an exercise for the reader at home: Watch Kurasawa's Jimbo the Body Guard and name which western was based on it.;)

    2. Re:Wrong Kurosawa film by eidechse · · Score: 1

      "Fist Full of Dollars"

      and the third rev:

      "Last Man Standing"

    3. Re:Wrong Kurosawa film by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and I often here Millers Crossing said to be based on it as well. However, I've never seen that movie....

    4. Re:Wrong Kurosawa film by glebfrank · · Score: 1

      And Yojimbo itself was based on Dashiel Hammett's book "Red Harvest," btw.

    5. Re:Wrong Kurosawa film by eidechse · · Score: 1

      hmmm...I have that one here somewhere...it's been a while since I watched it...

      IIRC, it may have the "play multiple big players off of each other" theme, but I think it had a different structure. But rather than try and guess some more I'll go watch it :)

      Thanks for the tip.

  138. I once had respect for George Lucas by ndtechnologies · · Score: 1

    After reading this interview, I have since lost any respect that I once held for him. How much more insulting to the public can he be, short of saying "All of the Star Wars fans throughout the world are ignorant morons for enjoying the original trilogy". Granted, the man definitely has some insecurity issues, but it isn't the fans fault that they like the original trilogy (and I don't mean the SE versions either). Let's face it, George had a great vision, but his directing is horrible, his script writing is subpar, and his dialogue absolutely reeks. There is a specific reason why Lucas didn't direct Episodes 5 and 6, and I firmly believe this is why, and it probably also explains why he vehemently hates the Original Trilogy. I find it interesting that he hates the original trilogy so much, but he sure doesn't seem to hate the money that it made him. Take some Prozac George, and go up to the mountains and commune with nature or something....oh and HAN SHOOTS FIRST!!!

    --
    I have nothing clever to put here...
  139. Lsd and cereal? by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

    Phantom mennace is way too boring to assosiated with LSD. Its more like Lucas took a group of fanboys and had them write it. Its rather geeky. I mean that in the sence that its just a sequnce of events with no emotional ties between them. No real character development. I understand that eveyrone here thinks that they could have done better, but not many of them understand hwo easy it is create crap and how difficult it is to create anthing better.

    Its much more like Caffine and cheetos. Jittery and really cheesey.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    1. Re:Lsd and cereal? by Starsmore · · Score: 1
      "Its more like Lucas took a group of fanboys and had them write it."

      You'd be hard pressed to find a Star Wars fanboy crazy enough to come up with that midichlorian tripe.

      --
      "If Common Sense was so common, it wouldn't be such a valued trait."
    2. Re:Lsd and cereal? by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      Actually, thats what I was thinking of when I wrote it. I think they would of come up with many things just as stupid.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  140. The end of the article made me laugh out loud by dswensen · · Score: 1

    Lucas: Ultimately, I'm going to probably move it into television and let other people take it. I'm sort of preserving the feature film part for what has happened and never go there again.

    Rate article +5, Funny.

  141. Re:to me, it doesn't really exist anymore. by MustardMan · · Score: 1
  142. rip and burn by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1
    It's out on VHS and laserdisc.

    Anybody want to rip the laserdisc and burn some DVDs? I bet you could make a pretty penny doing that.

    Not that I'm advocating anything illegal. I was just curious. No, really!

  143. BS George, orig digitized/refurbed to make HD by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

    I'm not going to spend the, we're talking millions of dollars here, the money and the time to refurbish that, because to me, it doesn't really exist anymore.

    Complete BS. Didn't the last Star Wars article point out that the original prints were used for digitizing the HD version:

    "The process: First, he analyzes the film and notes its biggest problems, be it dust or softness. Then he sets parameters for the restoration software. The computer system divides the film into segments and applies fixes, identifying flaws by comparing neighboring film frames. Lowry and his team check the processed scenes daily, frame by frame. Restoration took about a month per film. As footage became ready, segments were downloaded onto a portable hard drive and shipped to Lucas for approval."

    http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/techinnovations/ 2004-09-06-star-wars_x.htm

  144. Mythology? by jdavidb · · Score: 1

    I'll base it on sort of mythological motifs and icons.

    Nah; Lucas didn't say that until much later. After people noticed he'd used all the elements of an epic hero, he retrofitted on this idea that he was deliberately trying to do something to match Joseph Campbell's work. When the whole point of Campbell's work was that these motifs arise unconsciously, without deliberate attempt.

  145. Probably redundant at this point, but... by LookSharp · · Score: 1

    AP: Why did you rework the original trilogy into the special-edition versions in the late 1990s?

    Lucas: To me, the special edition ones are the films I wanted to make. Anybody that makes films knows the film is never finished. It's abandoned or it's ripped out of your hands, and it's thrown into the marketplace, never finished. It's a very rare experience where you find a filmmaker who says, "That's exactly what I wanted. I got everything I needed. I made it just perfect. I'm going to put it out there." And even most artists, most painters, even composers would want to come back and redo their work now. They've got a new perspective on it, they've got more resources, they have better technology, and they can fix or finish the things that were never done. ... I wanted to actually finish the film the way it was meant to be when I was originally doing it. At the beginning, people went, "Don't you like it?" I said, "Well, the film only came out to be 25 or 30 percent of what I wanted it to be." They said, "What are you talking about?" So finally, I stopped saying that, b! ut if you read any interviews for about an eight- or nine-year period there, it was all about how disappointed I was and how unhappy I was and what a dismal experience it was. You know, it's too bad you need to get kind of half a job done and never get to finish it. So this was my chance to finish it.


    This is heartbreakingly wrong on so many levels. The Aldous Huxley quote in another Score:5 comment hit so close to home, I hope it falls under Lucas's eyes at some point and moves him to reconsider. If you can make the movie and modify it now, what's to stop musicians from changing CDs every time a new batch is stamped? Movies are not dynamic, they are static releases. If someone wants to invent an evolving art form and continually update something on whims, great. But world-renowned cinema is not the place to experiment with this concept. The movies spoke to people as they were. They produced reactions, both positive and negative, for good reason.

    I could type about this for an hour and still not make all the points I want to, so I think I'll just stop.

    AP: Do you pay much attention to fan reactions to your choices?

    Lucas: Not really. The movies are what the movies are. ... The thing about science-fiction fans and "Star Wars" fans is they're very independent-thinking people. They all think outside the box, but they all have very strong ideas about what should happen, and they think it should be their way. Which is fine, except I'm making the movies, so I should have it my way.


    Because I have seen more than my share of whiny SciFi fans, I begin to identify with the "it's nice to have an opinion..." part. But the second half of his cocky statement is a self-aggrandizing "...but my opinion is the only important one." "I'm making the movies" is a ridiculously over-simplified remark, especially considering the crap about hundreds of people losing their jobs if someone downloads a movie on the Internet.

    This only punctuates the assessment that Lucas is not an artist, not a true filmmaker; but more of a hack who got a lucky break by being in the right place at the right time with a good (at the time) product. In fact, the changes he's made and the tack he's taken now seem to indicate that either 1) He never had real talent, but had exceptional help making a good product in the 70s and 80s, or 2)He's gone through some sort of change where a legitimate genius has dissolved into a worthless husk of a man who's banking on previous successes, with an egotistical mindset that power and wealth have obviated the need for QUALITY.

    I'm banking on the latter.

    I never thought I'd say it, but George Lucas, you really ARE an ASSHOLE.

  146. 25 or 30 percent by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1

    Lucas: "Well, the film only came out to be 25 or 30 percent of what I wanted it to be."

    Me: So... 70 to 75 percent of your movie is a retarded scene with an animated jabba, a dewback in the background, and an extra shock ring or two on the space explosions? Hmmm...

    1. Re:25 or 30 percent by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1

      Lucas: "I'm the one who has to have everybody throw rocks at me all the time, so at least if they're going to throw rocks at me, they're going to throw rocks at me for something I love rather than something I think is not very good, or at least something I think is not finished."

      NO ONE THREW ANY ROCKS UNTIL YOU CHANGED THE FREAKIN FILMS!!!

  147. Compare the differences - Jaba now Jaba then by LabRat007 · · Score: 1


    Here is a split screen video comparing the 97 "New Hope" Jaba to the new DVD release.

    enjoy

    --
    "Capital punishment makes the state into a murderer. Imprisonment makes the state into a gay dungeon-master"
    1. Re:Compare the differences - Jaba now Jaba then by inkswamp · · Score: 1
      FREAKIN' FANTASTIC! When I saw the 97 SE of IV, I was very disappointed in that scene. The CG wasn't up to the task of rendering Jabba and he looked a little too much like a refugee from an id game or something. Now, it's totally believable. Amazing. I was of the opinion that the scene should be scrapped, but it's beautiful now.

      --
      --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
  148. Four words. by Speare · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Four words: Laser Disc Definitive Collection.

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
    1. Re:Four words. by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      Seven words: Laser Disc Definitive Collection - converted to DVD.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    2. Re:Four words. by eples · · Score: 1

      Wow - it actually is on laserdisc.
      It's almost worth buying just to have.

      --
      I'm a 2000 man.
    3. Re:Four words. by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Five words: Massive quality drop, you idiot.

      Seriously, is it really that bad to keep a laserdisc player hooked up for three films if they're three of your favorites? I mean, I have mine for some non-DVD anime, original ET and the Indy films too, but it would certainly be worth it for just Star Wars. I mean, I have a VHS player hooked up and I haven't watched a VHS tape, well, since I hooker it up.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    4. Re:Four words. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Laserdiscs are uncompressed. Converting to DVD (MPEG-2) or divx (MPEG-4) would be the first encoding, not a re-encoding, and would look great.

    5. Re:Four words. by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      As the AC noted - the highend laserdisc version was completely uncompressed. Sure its an analog out - but if you have a decent player you can do a capture of seperated video rather then composite. The quality is excellent. So your encode to mpeg 2 format for the DVDs would be very close in quality to the actual laserdisc with probably no real loss in quality.
      Of course you need to know what you are doing to make the transfer and encode come out nice - and you won't get the 5.1 sound but it is certainly better than keeping the honking huge ass laserdisc around.
      Before you open your mouth why don't you actually get some experience in video - you idiot.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
  149. Re:to me, it doesn't really exist anymore. by dosius · · Score: 1

    Oh sure, there's torrents on Suprnova and Myspleen.

    Moll.

    --
    What you hear in the ear, preach from the rooftop Matthew 10.27b
  150. Re:The future... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You teabaggin' liberals are soooo angry...did daddy not love you enough, if you know what I mean? Go smoke a cock.

  151. The horror... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is anyone else disgusted at the huge song and dance number at Jabba's palace in the special edition? And what's with Jabba in a new hope? He looks radically different from the one in ROTJ, and it's only a couple of years apart. And in general, the mixing of the new computer animated stuff, and the old stuff, doesn't mix.

  152. Never satisfied with the original ... by arhar · · Score: 1

    ... I have to agree with him that an artist is never satisfied with his art and never thinks it's perfect. Same with programming - when I make a program, unless it's a really trivial one, I never think of it as 'finished' and always strive to add more features, improve the UI, etc ...

  153. Remember way back when... by MattW · · Score: 1

    Remember way back in the good old days, before piracy, when a movie like Finding Nemo could really move DVDs out the door? Boy, it's too bad nowadays, that more recent releases have such dismal sales.

    Poor George. Your pain must be unbearable.

  154. Steal this movie by Tony+Freakin+Twist · · Score: 1

    an audience lends power and validity to a work of art. what artists tend to forget is that w/o an audience art is meaningless and masturbatory. if that was the intended reason for the creation, so be it - but as soon as a work of art is public it is no longer sole property of the artist.
    consensus makes something more than a lump of clay or a random wave of sound or a string of pictures.

    1. Re:Steal this movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a complete and utter load of crap.

  155. There's a new trilogy for the future... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Uh... where have you all been?

    There is a new trilogy that has taken the place of Star Wars for future generations and it is called The Lord of the Rings by Peter Jackson.

    Regardless of whether you liked them or not, these three films (in both forms) and their director are more respectable than Star Wars and Lucass was or ever will be.

    Who gives a flyin' flip what Lucass does anymore? I've already downloaded the originals to replace my four degrading VHS copies anyway.

    1. Re:There's a new trilogy for the future... by Warlock7 · · Score: 1

      If you can get past the changes that Jackson made to the original stories, then I suppose you can sort of call him more credible. But it doesn't change the fact that he added dialogue, events and scenes to the storyline which makes it something other than the Lord of the Rings, IMO.

    2. Re:There's a new trilogy for the future... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Completely different situation.

      Peter Jackson has interpreted someone elses work for a different medium than the original - in this case book to film, which by its very nature requires changes to work.

      If Peter Jackson decides to release new versions of the film with the latest in 3D video in 20 years, then you can make this comparison.

    3. Re:There's a new trilogy for the future... by Warlock7 · · Score: 1

      Interpreting would be remaining true to the original without the addition of scenes and lines that never happened in the original medium. This he did not do.

      What you call interpreted, I call bastardized.

  156. Oh, why not? by LittleGuy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Shaft: Luke, I'm your baaaaaaaaad mother----

    Luke: Shut yo mouth!

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
    1. Re:Oh, why not? by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      oh god that was funny
      good work

  157. Re:Coming soon! Star Wars SE directors cut PLATINU by arose · · Score: 1

    Coming soon after in the news: Lucas shoots first fan.

    --
    Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
  158. The urge to tinker by Bora+Horza+Gobuchol · · Score: 1

    While what you're saying is true - the artist should have complete creative control over his work (and, I would add, that it's my belief that purchasers should have near-complete creative control over their purchased version of the work) - what the debate is about (aside from those who are screaming about how Lucas raped their childhoods) is this:

    Is the urge to tinker with a work and the ability to do so always a good thing?

    The best analogy I can make is with word processors. Compared to writing longhand, a word processor gives the user the power to instantly change, delete, and re-order text. Has that ability made for better writing, on the whole?

    My argument would be that it hasn't. Word processors have given people the ability to ramble in text, to endlessly edit without actually improving the narrative. At the same time, appreciation of language itself is steadily eroding, since writing is so easy - there's no compelling pressure for clear or consise writing.

    Yes, Lucas has the right to change his work as he wills. The problem is that his original vision, as poor as he sees it now, was perfectly adequate to the vast majority of his audience, and the "improvements" that he makes are, for the most part, not. (I certainly enjoy the clarity of the digital remastering, clearer sound, and improved SFX - but that's equivalent to cleaning the Sistine. What Lucas is doing is comparitive to adding Jesus Christ on a motorcycle to the fresco during restoration).

  159. His "artistic vision" gave us Jar Jar and the kid. by khasim · · Score: 1

    His "artistic vision" will feature a surfboard battle on molten lava in the next movie.

    His "artistic vision" recycled R2D2 and C3PO from the original trilogy.

    His "artistic vision" results in a massive space ship being destroyed to save the day with one shot in 3 out of the 5 episodes so far.

    His "artistic vision" is empty. It wasn't always, but now it is.

  160. Prediction… by selfsimilar · · Score: 1

    ...Lucas releases the original theatrical versions of episodes 4, 5, & 6 on DVD in 3-5 years because of "pressure from fans". Basically the only reason he's not selling it right now is he knows he can get people who only want the original cut to settle for his "special" editions now, and then buy again a few years down the road. If he released multiple versions now it would just confuse consumers and fragment the buying base.

    But it actually would be really easy for him to rerelease the theatrical versions in a restored state - what do you think he based all of the current footage on? Sure he added a bunch of stuff, but I guarantee he went back to the original negatives and separate effects shots, scanned those all in and cleaned them up before adding all the Special Edition crap. Essentially he already has what the people want. He just knows that a good number will buy twice (or more) if he's careful about his release strategy.

  161. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  162. Best... Mispelling... Ever! by dman123 · · Score: 1
    "Now? Han is an unambigious good guy. Big whip."

    I thought we were discussing Star Wars, not Raiders of the Lost Ark.

    --

    --
    dman123 forever!
    Filtering out the -1s and 0s since 1999.
    1. Re:Best... Mispelling... Ever! by sphealey · · Score: 1

      >> Big whip.

      > I thought we were discussing Star Wars, not
      > Raiders of the Lost Ark.

      Wondered if anyone would figure that out.

      sPh

  163. Liberals got to Lucas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The second version must be correct. If Han had pursued a doctrine of preemption, it could be argued that he never really knew for sure that Greedo's gun was or wasn't loaded (and the fact that in the orignal, he didn't check Greedo's gun afterwards just goes to show how insensitive he really was).

    (Score:-5, Conservative)

    1. Re:Liberals got to Lucas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the point of the original was to portray Han Solo as a less-than-perfect character.

    2. Re:Liberals got to Lucas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like (Score:-5, Total Fuckwit)

    3. Re:Liberals got to Lucas by kalidasa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I dunno. I don't remember any scenes of Chewbacca getting killed by a bunch of Jawas with a rocket propelled grenade launcher while helping Han search the deserts outside Mos Eiseley for Greedo's blaster.

    4. Re:Liberals got to Lucas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      KA-Zing!

  164. "Independent thought by H_Fisher · · Score: 1
    AP: Do you pay much attention to fan reactions to your choices?

    Lucas: Not really. The movies are what the movies are. ... The thing about science-fiction fans and "Star Wars" fans is they're very independent-thinking people. They all think outside the box, but they all have very strong ideas about what should happen, and they think it should be their way. Which is fine, except I'm making the movies, so I should have it my way.

    Well put, George. My idea is, the "special edition" isn't the true film. So I'm not buying these.

    Oh, and about piracy being a threat to the market? Who wants to bet that in a year or two Lucas says that "I would've released the original versions, but all those pirates on e-Bay selling ripped laserdisc versions ruined the market..."?

    Ah well, George - have it your way. I don't think these will sell as well as intended. And I'm waiting for the backlash when the 80% of the public that's expecting the original films on DVD finds out they're getting the "special" editions instead.

  165. Jar Jar et al by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

    Anyone know if the rumors are true that Jar Jar is getting inserted into one of the films, and that Hayden Whatshisface will be shown as a ghost at the end of Jedi? I'm interested in getting the DVD (in spite of the travesty of Han not shooting first, etc etc) but I draw the line if Lucas has added stuff from the crappy prequels to the original trilogy.

    1. Re:Jar Jar et al by Warlock7 · · Score: 1

      Go here to see some of what's different.

      I haven't heard anything about Jar Jar being included in any of the original films. But, yes, Hayden is in the ghost scenes on ROTJ. The Han/Greedo incident has been changed again too.

    2. Re:Jar Jar et al by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      Argh! Guess Lucas isn't getting my money on this one.

  166. Why you sonfa... by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    PRIOR ART! PRIOR ART! PLAGURISIM! LAWSUIT! HYSTERIA!

    This guy is stealing all my best material!

    Say, what is the monitary renumeration that can be claimed for emotional damages due to being plagurized on /.? I'm very vunerable emotionally, you know...

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  167. Re:The future... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Teabags, eh? I remember when a bunch of TERRORISTS dumped a load of tea into a harbor. They later became YANKEE IMPERIALIST BASTARDS who TERRORIZE everyone and then bitch when someone responds in kind.

  168. Moby Dick: Special Edition - Fewer Vowels by Viking+Coder · · Score: 1

    In a surprise turn of events, Bantam Classics, the publishers of Moby Dick have decided to release a new version, with every "A", "E", and "U" removed. Some of the "Y"s will remain. "The original was called 'Moby Dick,' not 'Maeiouby Daeiouck', and we fill that Herman Melville would have wanted it this way. Really, it improves the work. I don't know why everyone is so upset," wrote the president of Bantam Classics, when reached by email. "Frankly, the old version wasn't as good, and we're never going to publish it again."

    "Cll m Ishml." reads the first line of the improved version of the epic work.

    </sarcasm>

    Some works you don't need to see to criticize.

    --
    Education is the silver bullet.
  169. Re:Anybody cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck yeah, homestone. Keep 'em rolling.

  170. To Lucas from a *real* Star Wars fan by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 1

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"

    How about this?

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the DVD player, sitting down with George Lucas, and hitting him?"

    The man needs a reality slap!

  171. Opinion by siskbc · · Score: 1
    No, this was the most insightful comment I have read here for a long time. Of course, if you're brainwashed, maybe you don't see it.

    It's OT and I'm sick of people modding their opinion like it was goddamned fact. He's a troll. If he said something inflammatory like that against Kerry, he'd get modbombed into hell and you know it. But because the slashbots all think the same way, as long as you flame in the acceptable direction, it's "insightful." Not to mention it's hard to be insightful when you keep spouting off the same damned troll, but I digress

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    1. Re:Opinion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You're reading too much into this (and are being offtopic yourself) if you're trying to make this thread into a Kerry/Bush flamewar.

      Personally, I think the message is that "history is written by the winners", and would love to see Star Wars ep 7-9 focus on Luke's kid exposing the guys responsible for this revisioinist history.

    2. Re:Opinion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That posting was a witty and unobvious interpretation of Lucas' revisionism. Therefore it was a welcome contribution to this discussion. It was not offtopic, as opposed to your posting, in which you demanded that an opinion should be modded down that didn't fit your political agenda you tried to drag into this discussion. The troll is you, sir.

  172. Kathleen Dee-Anne "Koo" Stark by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    This remake will become interesting if it includes, at least in the deleted scenes section, the ones with Koo Stark.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  173. I want my money back for having wasted my time by smurfnsanta · · Score: 1

    I don't know what marketing group told Lucas stupid sells, but I want my money and time back asshole.

  174. Would That Mean The Republicans Got To Him? by Wandering+Wombat · · Score: 1

    n/t

    --
    I like to place meaningful quotes in my sig, so people will know that I know what meaningful quotes are.
  175. The gist of it by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 1

    He's being a jerk about this and abusing the power he has thanks to copyrights.

    He's an egomaniac ....

    In short: ... He insists on changing them because he can..."


    To summarize, he's becoming Palpatine.

  176. No, no, no by M.C.+Hampster · · Score: 4, Funny

    Actually, in the new version of Ep 4, Alderaan shoots first. The Death Star was just acting in self defense as Lucas originally intended.
    In the new version of Episode 4, the Death Star's beam has been changed into a giant walkie-talkie.
    --
    Forget the whales - save the babies.
    1. Re:No, no, no by julesh · · Score: 1

      OK, this is it. What is it with the walkie-talkie jokes? What is this about?

    2. Re:No, no, no by netsharc · · Score: 1

      In ET, there's a scene where a cop makes a road-block of some sort -- I think to prevent ET and the kid from escaping? I don't remember -- and the cop held a shotgun in his hands. In the 20th Anniversary release, the shotgun has been edited into a walkie-talkie, for reasons that I can sure you can imagine. Great huh?

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
  177. Ahem... by makavelli · · Score: 1

    Uh, how can you bitch at people for quoting Chappelle and other actors, and then use a sig that is a direct quote from an SNL skit????

    1. Re:Ahem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also amusing that he indirectly accuses someone of being unoriginal by ripping of someone else's writing.

    2. Re:Ahem... by MustardMan · · Score: 1

      I actually LINKED to someone else's writing, never took credit for it. And it's just a joke, lighten up.

      If you want a rebuttal, like I was actually pissed at the parent, then I'll point out that the Chappelle joke is massively overdone these days, while relatively few do the old SNL Celebrity Jeopardy ones.

  178. Not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Yoda Russia, back strikes the Empire.

  179. I like the updated versions... by Lonath · · Score: 1

    even though I saw the original versions as a child and bought all those damn toys. :P I think it's nice that he gets to refactor his movies to make them the way he wants.

  180. Waffles by Garwulf · · Score: 1

    "Cogito Eggo Sum: I think, therefore, waffle."

    Er...in the original "ergo" means "therefore." You've just declared in your .sig file that you think you are a waffle...

    --
    Robert B. Marks
    Author, Demonsbane in Diablo Archive
    1. Re:Waffles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot the, "now don't do it again. Or I'll cut off your balls" admonishment. It's a shame really, because you might have got modded up if you did.

  181. Could we release the original ourselves? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got an idea how we can get the original SW movies...

    I just wondered how difficult it would be to edit out the special effects added in the special edition releases, and release a version of Star Wars closer to the original?

    As I understand it, the DVD version is remastered to be clearer and less "grainy". If you've seen how Indiana Jones turned out, I'm sure you'll agree that the remastering (not the added special effects) is really well done...

    When SW is released on DVD, we could use it as a base. We take out all the extra scenes that were added to the originals.
    Any remaining scenes that were changed, we'd overwrite them with a laser disk verson.

    Sure its going to be all crisp and clear, and then go grainy in the Greedo scene, for example.. but I'd take that any day over the bastardized version released on DVD.

    That could just be the start too. Once all the scenes from the LD are in digital format we could begin the process of removing the grainy detail from each frame. Yes its painstaking work, but software could be developed that does some of it for us.. as a SW fan I'd clean up a frame per day. I'm sure others would too. Distributed film cleanup ;)

    I know I'm simplifying things, but are there any film buffs who want to take this on?

  182. Heisenberg's blaster. by Thud457 · · Score: 1
    I've got a perfect solution! Just lock Han and Greedo in a box. When Han comes out, Greedo's dead.

    That should shut up all you pansy liberals that whine about "preemption"!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:Heisenberg's blaster. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your stupid ass is lucky that the British didn't "preemption" the colonies off the face of the earth at the first sign of discontent.

  183. Lame fool that I am, I will buy these anyway by JimLynch · · Score: 1

    I can't help it. I have wanted them for so long that I'll just deal with the fact that it's the special edition. Plus I'm getting older so I think I'm starting to forget some of the originals anyway. ;-)

    --

    Jim Lynch

    Tech Analyst and Community Manager

  184. What is wrong with the SE? Let's fix it. by jubei · · Score: 1

    Let's not leave it to Lucas to release the edition we want. Let's make it ourselves.

    From what I understand, most of the changes are minor, and the DVDs will be remastered and cleaned up. This should provide better quality than VHS or Laserdisc.

    So what are the specific complaints? Greedo shoots first? No problem. That is only a couple of frames that need to be edited. Don't like the goofy Jaba scene in episode 1, edit it out.

    We can rip the MPEG2 and make the changes we see fit.

    What changes would you like to see?

  185. Just Pray For Lucas to Die...then whom ever gets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All we have to do is pray that lucas will die sooner than later. Then whomever gets the rights to his movies can be pressured into releasing the originals on dvd for the HUGE somes of money they will make.

    so come on everyone ask gawd for divine intervention and wisk George off to the great beyond!

  186. Lucas contradicting himself. by SageMadHatter · · Score: 1

    ...To me, the special edition ones are the films I wanted to make...

    Later in the same interview question:
    ...most artists, most painters, even composers would want to come back and redo their work now. They've got a new perspective on it...

    Bingo, Mr Lucas! Well said! A new perspective. This means, that the special edition SW triology are not the films you had originally invisioned. I have no doubt that Lucas felt he was not done with the films at the time that they originally released, but I do doubt that the special edition is what we had in mind.

    Time changes people. For example, several years ago when the MMORPG market was small, I thought about putting together a review site specifically geared towards those type of games (there was no review site of it's kind at the time.) A new MMORPG had come out at the time, when I had this thought, and I played it and began writing a review. The review was harsh, straight to the point, and insightful at all the same time. I'm surprise to this day that I was able to write in such style. I never did put together a site, but whenever I think of doing it, I try to write in the same informative and critical style that I used back a few years ago and I simply can't. My perspective has changed. I'm now more informed about what it takes to develop these type of games. I work as a programmer for a living. I sympathize with what other coders working for a living have to put up with at their jobs. I realize that my perspective has changed and thus I can not produce the type of review style, a reader would want to read.

    Lucas' perspective has also changed. As much as he denies the films not having been complete, changes like Greedo shooting first was not part of his original idea.

  187. Given his take on '3 years from now' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems to me that he may expect revenge of the sith to be so regarded so badly that no one will want anything star wars...

    (Not to mention what's happened with SWG and all the other star wars related games).

    1. Re:Given his take on '3 years from now' by Warlock7 · · Score: 1

      30th Anniversary is more like it...

  188. Am I the only one... by Cervantes · · Score: 1

    ... who thinks the following odd:

    - Lucas paraphrase: I'm releasing it now, at the height of the pirated movie craze, because in 3 years the pirates will win and everything will be 0w|\|3d.
    - Am I the only one who recalls that, originally, Lucas was going to do 3 prequels and 3 sequels? Am I also the only one who thinks he saw how shitty the first 2 have been, and couldn't get funding to do another 3 piles of crap?
    - That all these "Special Edition" and "Platinum Edition" and "Unrated Edition" releases are SHIT? Seriously, a friend got the "Unrated Edition" of "The girl next door", which has been getting all this commercial coverage as "Oooh, unrated! racy! sexsexsex!", and I've been forced to sit through Sex and the City episodes that were racier? See, "Apocalypse Now: Redux" was a SPECIAL edition, with noticable extra content... even Das Boot: SE had noticable additions. But the 5th release of Terminator, the 12th of Star Wars 1-3, and pretty much every other SE in the last few years has been absolute crap. Most of them don't even incorporate the clips into the movie... they're "Extras" that you have to play later and go "yeah, that was cool, wish I had seen it an hour ago when I was actually watching a movie", and silly interviews where everyone says they love each other, and occasional directors commentaries that you can tell were recorded on a dictaphone while he was sitting on the crapper, scraping crabs off his Intel after another night at the Casting Couch.

    I had a point in that rant. I think it was "Special Editions almost always suck, and I won't buy any movie that I have not seen first, and that includes SEs, because they're all crap".

    Except for Natural Born Killers. That was one wicked-ass directors cut.

    --
    If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
    1. Re:Am I the only one... by Warlock7 · · Score: 1

      Only one minor point. Lucas funds these "piles of crap" himself, with his own corporation, that he now has because everybody buys his "piles of crap". I'd like to point out that the "three years from now" remark might show that he previously may have been planning a 30th anniversary release date for the DVDs.

  189. What is it, Obi-Wan? by AnalogDiehard · · Score: 2, Funny

    I sense a great disturbance in the force, as if a million SW fans cried out all at once.

    --
    Eternity: will that be smoking, or non-smoking? I Corinthians 6:9-10
  190. Re:Dr. Zoiberg Strikes Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Admiral Ackbar: Zoidberg I am your father!

    Dr. Zoidberg: Hurray! I'll be rich and admire!

    Admiral Ackbar: No, I am the laughing stock of the Internet and mostly a living joke.

    Dr. Zoidberg: Hooooaaaaaaaa.

  191. I'm making the movies, so I should have it my way by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That's from George Lucas and it typifies what I've always believed about directors - they work best when under financial and artistic constraints. A great example is The Matrix. The Wachowskis had a fairly limited budget and created a masterpiece. For the sequels they had a vastly larger budget and made turkeys. In fact, I think their best movie was the fairly low budget Bound. The same is true of many other directors including Lucas. Left to their own devices they'll make a mess of things. It really makes me cringe when a director says "now I can make the movie I've always wanted to make". When that happens you get self-indulgent crap. But the goal of film is to indulge the audience, not the director.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  192. Colorization hypocrisy by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ironically, it was people like George Lucas and Steven Speilberg who protested against the modification of existing classic movies when black and white movies were being colorized. In fact, they both testified before Congress against the practice of colorizatioin and other forms of alteration. I can vaguely recall that one of the arguments was that technology could reach a level in which people would do alterations like replace actor's faces with those of newer actors. Yet, they are the first to alter their own classics. Spielberg replaced guns with walkie-talkies in ET, and now Lucas is changing his movies as well. This is exactly the kind of alteration they testified against.

    1. Re:Colorization hypocrisy by Warlock7 · · Score: 1

      Interesting comment from the quote in that article:
      "I'm saying it's not fair to the artist."

      In this case, Lucas is the artist in question. In the case of the three stooges, the artists were already deceased and didn't have a say in the matter anymore. Today, Lucas says that this is his decision to make while back then he was saying that it wasn't fair for somebody else to change what wasn't theirs to begin with.

    2. Re:Colorization hypocrisy by chinton · · Score: 1

      The difference here being that he is modifing his own work rather than someone elses.

    3. Re:Colorization hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't irony. They protested on principle against altering the works of others. Why shouldn't they be free to alter their own works, and sell their updated versions exclusively? I mean, they haven't made the old versions illegal! Or even destroyed the originals, they are just choosing to exclusively sell and market the newer versions for the time being. Undoubtedly once interest has been driven sufficently high, and the updated versions have sold the copies they're going to sell, the originals will be released in some profit-gouging form. Does anyone really believe otherwise?

    4. Re:Colorization hypocrisy by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 1

      "I'm saying it's not fair to the artist."

      I believe that was a quote of criticism of the colorization of The Three Stooges in August this year. In fact, the color Stooges is being released alongside the black and white version, while Lucas isn't releasing the previous versions of his movies at all. And it's not like they are adding new scenes where "Shemp strikes first"- who's to say the original filmmakers wouldn't have used color film if it was around?

      I tried to google up transcripts of what he said before congress in the 80's, so I could compare it to his current approach, but couldn't find anything. Does anyone possibly have a link to a transcript? From what I vaguely recall, they were completely for preserving originality and against any alterations, but I don't recall if they mentioned revising their own work. However, one could argue that if they really were unhappy with some parts, they could have just re-filmed those parts and released the revised video a long time ago.

      However, I did find this about altering films...

      The copyright owners have shown every indication that once the 75-year copyright terms expire, they will prepare revised versions that qualify for new copyrights, and the originals will be withdrawn from circulation.

      In short, as their oldest films complete their 75-year term of copyright protection, the studios have considerable incentive to create new versions. Public domain is not going to lead to the widespread availability of the great films. Instead, it will be the cause of the disappearance of these motion pictures in their original versions.

      Star Wars (the first film) would have become public domain in 2052. Revising Star Wars the way he did just extended the copyright by another 27 years to 2079. Making minor changes could be a way of fixing things the filmmakers wanted to revisit, or it could be a way of never allowing the film to fall into public domain by sneaking in changes with every distribution medium change. I wonder if this applies to digital copies?

    5. Re:Colorization hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly.

    6. Re:Colorization hypocrisy by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that Ted Turner was not the creator and/or director of any of those films that were colorized. I own a film, I'll modify it as I see fit. Lucas owns a film, he'll modify it as he sees fit.

    7. Re:Colorization hypocrisy by Warlock7 · · Score: 1

      I don't see that it really matters when he said it. The Stooges issue is different than the Star Wars issue. The copyright holder of the Stooges shorts isn't in any way the "artist" that created them. Whereas the Star Wars one is.

      As for the changes made to the distributions of the films, do you think that the copyright extension counts with the changes made to the sound in the films as well? He's made changes to the sound quality with every release of the original trilogy. Star Wars was released in mono, then it hit video in mono, then in stereo then in Pro-Logic, then in THX and so on...

      The sound question is an issue that you never hear anybody complain about too much though. "I can't stand that it's in 5.1 now, I want my good old mono audio back!" Nobody is complaining about the digital remastering either, even though it's not the original film anymore.

      None of this changes the fact that he's done what he's done just like he did it in the past.

      As pointed out by some others here too, this is not a new concept to art. It might be a newer idea with film. Tolkein rewrote a significant part of the Hobbit in the early fifties to support his portrayal of the Golem character in the Lord of the Rings trilogy.

  193. Here's a clip by Gudlyf · · Score: 2

    You can see the edited version of the clip here, with Lucas's braindead commentary on his reasoning for the change.

    --
    Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
    1. Re:Here's a clip by SamSeaborn · · Score: 1
      You can see the edited version of the clip here

      Holy crap! In this clip Lucas says he wants to change the "sword fight" in Raiders when he gets a chance!!

      That's such a great moment -- somebody stop him!

      Sam

    2. Re:Here's a clip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod parent up - that's insane. fuck lucas. money grubbing revisionist fucking loser. i dont even like star wars all that much, but this guy is a fucking tool.

  194. eBay, US$200 currently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  195. Hey, Look Everyone! by Stickerboy · · Score: 2, Insightful
    It's a dead horse!

    ...let's beat it!

    (/facetiousness)

    Honestly, people, I know karma whoring is a virtual sport now, but if you don't have anything new or interesting to say that couldn't be cut and pasted from the LAST Star Wars /. commentary (or the last fifty, for that matter), then please, shut the barn door. The collective IQ is dropping.

    For everyone else that's been reading this site for more than, oh, a week, every post that's simply rehashing (A) "Lucas is a money grubbing hack!", (B) "Lucas raped my childhood!" or even (C) "Lucas owns the movies, not you!" grates the nerves until I just want to proverbially shoot every last one of you, just to end your supposed misery.

    No, making long-winded stream-of-consciousness variants of (A), (B), or (C) that you have to "Click to read the rest of the comment..." does not count as interesting or new.

    No, using Boston Brahmin to expound and elaborate on (A), (B), or (C) does not count as being interesting or new.

    And no, relating your latest pet analogy that you ripped off from a poster in another story to George Lucas and (A), (B), or (C) is not interesting or new, either.

    (/soapbox)

    --
    Light a fire for a man and he'll be warm for a day. Light a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:Hey, Look Everyone! by Starsmore · · Score: 1
      How about "Lucas owns the childhood hack movies!"

      Why not "Lucas raped the hack movies!" or "Childhood raped my Lucas!"

      I think "Lucas owns the hack movies!" fits nicely here.

      --
      "If Common Sense was so common, it wouldn't be such a valued trait."
  196. A video clip comparison of Jabba scene(SE vs. DVD) by antdude · · Score: 1

    Go here to view the comparison. Big differences.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  197. Tarantino does the edits. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Greedo: Han, it's your ba..
    Han: *BANG*

  198. So am I the only one who still likes star wars? by AtlanticCarbon · · Score: 1

    Episode 1 sucked but the rest were entertaining and I'm glad they exist. The extended universe is fun too. Where else can I see tao monks fighting in outerspace?

    I'll take as much sci-fi as the pretentious directors and producers want to put out there. That said I'm not going to buy the DVDs-- I'm not into watching things over and over again.

  199. George Lucas: Go Fuck Yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    With a refrigerator.

  200. I think people are just giving Taco by Savatte · · Score: 2

    ideas for a new slashdot poll.

  201. Re:Anybody cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    word.

  202. Not the first time... by kaladorn · · Score: 1

    I'm saddened to see Han shooting first, because it is a historical revision of a much loved character. He's the rough-around-the-edges loner who discovers something bigger than himself and who ends up showing he really is a good guy. But without a bit of the perception of him as scoundrel and Grey Hat, his transition to mostly White Hat is less profound.

    The truth is, with the exception of cleaning up the bluescreening around the models, the new versions haven't added much for the better. The original three had a powerful story with a number of iconic and mythologic themes. Everything George has done to them (yes TO them...) since has been a pretty bad idea.

    And his latest product is visually stimulating and absolutely devoid of other quality.

    And George himself is turning into (we're giving him the benefit of the doubt in the early days) a self-absorbed prima donna and a bit of a pratt to boot. :(

    Another great example of how to ride great beginnings into mediocre endings.

    But as I said in my post title, this isn't Lucas' first example to revise SW history. Ask for a copy of the Star Wars Christmas Special at your local Blockbuster. Good luck... George has pretty much seen to it that this was more or less only to survive in old bootlegged versions. It wasn't great art (far from it), but it is just further evidence of trying to revise the past.... and about as well thought out.

    I think George has been turned to the Dork Side.

    --
    -- Mal: "Well they tell you: never hit a man with a closed fist. But it is, on occasion, hilarious."
    1. Re:Not the first time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I'm saddened to see Han shooting first, because it is a historical revision of a much loved character.

      News flash: In the original version, Han DOES shoot first.

    2. Re:Not the first time... by kaladorn · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, trust an AC to catch the missing word. I bear my humiliation with good humour. I meant "Han NOT shooting first" of course. Yes, good catch, even if you weren't willing to attach your name to the sniping. ;)

      --
      -- Mal: "Well they tell you: never hit a man with a closed fist. But it is, on occasion, hilarious."
  203. Its time for a fan edit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have the technology to do.

    I like some of the updated stuff in the movies. The space battles are better looking, the could city is nicer.

    But, I think once the DVD's are released, someone could just splice in the old han solo scene from an original laser disc version. And cut out some of the crap lucas put in.

    then release on bit torrent.

  204. Han repeats himself by isomeme · · Score: 1

    I only saw the enhanced version of Episode IV once, as my doctor has advised me to avoid situations which make me feel suicidal. So I need someone to confirm my memory of one particuarly awful point.

    In the hacked-in scene where Han talks to Jabba, is it really the case that Han's lines are practically word-for-word the same as his earlier lines to Greedo? Like the script was cut-and-pasted from one to the other with a few penciled-in changes?

    Am I imagining things? Because if not, and if that's the way it was in Lucas's grand creative vision, Lucas is needs professional help, pronto. Because that's just plain sloppy filmmaking.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
    1. Re:Han repeats himself by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1

      It's not just you, I haven't seen any version of that movie for years now, but I do remember wondering about that myself; along with Han stepping on Jabba's "tail" (for, I suppose, similarly recycling-related reasons) it made that particular scene seem extremely cheap (and I don't even care who shot first)

  205. No, seriously by Chmcginn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You've complaining about improper grammar when somebody is using Yoda-speak. I mean, come on...

    --
    Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
    1. Re:No, seriously by Sunnan · · Score: 1

      Like with Japanese, when Yoda speak somebody is using, the verb always last comes. Random it is not.

    2. Re:No, seriously by GenSolo · · Score: 1

      the verb always last comes.
      Last the verb always comes. To English-speakers, inverted it seems. First the object is, for in the middle the subject will you find.

  206. HYPOCRISY!!! by pappy97 · · Score: 1

    In the AP interview, Lucas says the original SW films are incomplete and it's too bad fans fell in love with it. He has no plans to release them on DVD.

    Now check out the THX 1138 DVD. Why the f*ck is his original student film on it???? After all, that student film is an uncomplete work and it's too bad fans want to see it. He should not be releasing it, but of course, he's a hypocrite.

    1. Re:HYPOCRISY!!! by inkswamp · · Score: 1
      The student film != the theatrical release. He did THX-1138 as a student film prior to the theatrical version. If he had done SW as a student film too we'd probably see that on there as well.

      You're entitled to an opinion about it of course, but don't go screaming hypocrisy for no reason.

      --
      --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
    2. Re:HYPOCRISY!!! by pappy97 · · Score: 1

      No, THX 1138 is an adapation from an earlier student film. They are different works.
      http://www.dvdmg.com/thx1138.shtml

      Much like how Lucas considers SW (Original) to be different from SW:SE.

      Thus Lucas is a hypocrit for putting the student film "Version" of THX along with theatrical THX on a DVD, while SW:Original does not appear on the SW Triology DVD Set.

    3. Re:HYPOCRISY!!! by pappy97 · · Score: 1

      "A very worthwhile addition, the disc includes Electronic Labyrinth THX 1138 4EB, the short film precursor to the theatrical version. It fills 15 minutes and five seconds as it tells an abbreviated and fairly different version of the tale. It hasn't aged terribly well, as it often seems amateurishly acted and silly, but I'm happy to get in on this set, as it's very interesting to see Lucas's early work."
      http://www.dvdmg.com/thx1138.shtml

      Proof Lucas is a hypocrite.

    4. Re:HYPOCRISY!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i disagree. for this comparison to work gl would have needed to have produced a separate version of sw prior to the actual sw and then refused to include that. your making a huge leap. does thx1138 dvd include the theatrical version prior to his touch-ups? no, it doesn't. i'm not sure what you're carrying on about.

  207. I hate to be so blunt... but... by Viewsonic · · Score: 1
    Why aren't these interviewers asking the real questions?

    Like, "How do you feel about the Star Wars universe becoming a total corporate playtoy?" and "What do you say to the majority of your fans who all think you turned the Mona Lisa into a Nike logo?" and "How does it feel to be the things you've always hated to become, and how does it feel that all your one time fans now hate you for it as well?"

    Reading that article he just came off so... selfish.. so corporate.. so controlling. He was completely the opposite when he made those movies - They were a tribute to directors who could work outside of controlling figureheads. My analogy of the Mona Lisa were more than just a perfect movie, but the perfect way to MAKE the movie. He perfected every single area of it, from refusing to give control to FOX, to getting his own personal loans for the completion. And now... Ugh.

    1. Re:I hate to be so blunt... but... by inkswamp · · Score: 1
      How do you feel about the Star Wars universe becoming a total corporate playtoy?

      It must gall Lucas no end to be perhaps the most successful, fuck-you-corporate-assholes-I'm-doing-it-my-way filmmakers in history and to have legions of pissy fanboys accuse him of being a sell-out. Go read about the making of the SW films, about how he dealt with corporate studios, basically gave them and the overindulgent actor's unions the finger.

      You'll find out that you are a bigger corporate playtoy than George Lucas ever was.

      --
      --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
    2. Re:I hate to be so blunt... but... by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's so much a corporate playtoy, but you gotta admit he really disrespects his fans when he kills the thing that they fell in love with (and made him rich for). He claims its his movie and he can do what he wants, but to completely leave his fans hanging without a quality copy of the originals is just wrong.

      What if that awful (imo) Jessica Simpson remake of "Take my breath away" was the only version you could get on CD?

  208. So does this mean... by Zlurg · · Score: 1

    The Original Trilogy... in its unedited, unspecialized form... is now public domain? Or, more importantly, if he's abandoning the original trilogy, can one get sued for making DVDs of the original trilogy and selling them? 'Cuz, I'll tell you what, I have a Pioneer LaserDisc player and can get these puppies delivered on DVD in about a weekend for $5 a copy!

    1. Re:So does this mean... by Warlock7 · · Score: 1

      That would take some 75 years. So, in 2052 Star Wars might be...

  209. Making movies sounds like writing software by mnemotronic · · Score: 1
    Anybody that makes films knows the film is never finished. It's abandoned or it's ripped out of your hands, and it's thrown into the marketplace, never finished. It's a very rare experience where you find a filmmaker who says, "That's exactly what I wanted.
    This sounds like what happens with my software, which (to me) just highlights the creative, artistic aspects of writing good code.

    Another possible parallel, the "quickie" program that's written to fill a short-term need ends up hanging out for years, taken over by someone else, getting patched, modified, and expanded way beyond it's original design objective, then coming back to haunt me 20 years from now. Hence my motivation to put more thought and planning into the "quickies" -- they're gonna be my tombstones.

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  210. Some Good Changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Special Editions have some good changes. The X-Wings are more detailed. The Death Star explosions are more realistic. They've brought out the textures in a lot of (otherwise bland) scenes. The colors are very vibrant, although nearly distracting sometimes.

    I don't really care for Han Solo walking over Jabba's tail. He was a fat-ass in the Third film, so I don't know how he managed to push his fat-ass over to Tatooine; much less be denigned to discuss the matter with just another smuggler. The fucking musical CGI shit in the Third film was worthless, as well. But everything pales to Greedo.

    PALES.

    Either he (Lucas) was smoking enough dope during the 70's to keep some kind of fucking attachment to the rest of society, or those fucking boots he's wearing are cutting off the circulation to his god damn brain. Lucas is just another has-been in the pipeline of Hollywood director's. Everything he does in his lifetime is just fewer things that someone else would be able to do right.

    I recommend a burial at sea, as soon as possible, dead or alive, in an ocean FAR, FAR AWAY ...

  211. I apologise for this one: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Leia: Luke, in Soviet Russia my mother is you!

    Luke: *head explodes*

  212. Choice Quotes: by LilMikey · · Score: 2, Informative

    On why he brought it out now: "A lot of people are getting very worried about piracy. That has really eaten dramatically into the sales. It really just came down to, there may not be a market when I wanted to bring it out, which was like, three years from now."

    What? Every place I look claims DVD sales are very stong and not losing momentum any time soon (mainly thanks to idiots like me who buy 2 and 3 versions of the same crap I already own). Regardless, his decision boiled down to cold hard cash... not fan appreciation, not the desire to allow us to preserve the movies in a non-degrading format, not the desire to give us a higher-resolution better mastered version of the movies we love. Screw that, he needs cash.


    On the altered footage: It's like this is the movie I wanted it to be, and I'm sorry you saw half a completed film and fell in love with it.

    Wow... what complete and utter contempt for his most die-hard fans. "Screw you, this is what I like." "Screw your support for the past couple decades, this is what I want." Hate to tell you, Mr. Lucas but both your originality and your integrity have gone steadily downhill since those first 'incomplete' Star Wars movies. It's become painfully obvious that instead of a compelling storyline you'd prefer fancy effects. Instead of well developed characters you'd prefer good looking twits and CGIed alien idiots. It may be age or greed getting to you but make no mistake, you didn't release these special editions because they were the 'movies you wanted to make.' You released them so you could slap "New Special Effects" and a media-whoring poorly CGIed Jabba scene on the box cover and make a mint. Maybe, just maybe everyone fell in love with your movies because they were, you know, good. And just maybe we're all bitching because not only are you releasing movies that aren't any good but your destroying those that are.


    On the future of Star Wars: "Ultimately, I'm going to probably move it into television and let other people take it."

    Well, this is a bit of a mixed bag. On one hand, Lucas seems to be relinquishing control to someone who may possibly have some talent. That would be cool. On the other hand, we all know this is a last ditch pimp out to squeeze every little bit of cash from his cow. I can only hope that the TV series takes place in a land far far away from the trilogy's universe. There's not enough material in a movie to have a multi-season tv-show intersect with the same characters and timeline without seriously affecting the story. At this rate I wouldn't be suprised to see some "Leia: The Teenage Years" pushed on the ignorant masses.


    And finally:AP:"Do you pay much attention to fan reactions to your choices?"
    Lucas: "Not really."


    Yeah, Fuck you too.

    --
    LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
    1. Re:Choice Quotes: by onosendai · · Score: 1
      On why he brought it out now: "A lot of people are getting very worried about piracy. That has really eaten dramatically into the sales. It really just came down to, there may not be a market when I wanted to bring it out, which was like, three years from now."
      What? Every place I look claims DVD sales are very stong and not losing momentum any time soon (mainly thanks to idiots like me who buy 2 and 3 versions of the same crap I already own).
      I think you missed the point on the piracy angle. It's not about DVD sales vs Piracy generally, when he talks about losing money, it's about lost sales due to people having pirate dvd's now, versus people who will wait until they got released. It's kind of the same argument as p2p music piracy, if you download an album, the record company is missing out on a sale, wether you would have bought it or not.

      I don't necessarily agree with that, and think it's more a money grab to get an edition of SW out now, and a better HD transfer out in two years (read the previous article about the restoration process), but I think that's where he's coming from.
      --
      <? include ('signature.inc'); ?>
  213. True: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Originals Suck.

  214. he said the same thing about THX-1138 by k2enemy · · Score: 1

    and the result is a special edition with poorly done cgi scenes that look extremely out of place in a movie full of "old school" technology.

  215. This would all be fine if... by ForsakenRegex · · Score: 1

    ...he just comes out and explains he wanted all of his movies to be absolutely horrible. That way it makes perfect sense that he would go back and make them worse.

    If Kurosawa were brought back from the dead and it was explained to him that The Phantom Menace was at least in some way derived from The Hidden Fortress, he'd promptly fall over dead again.

    --
    "A man talking sense to himself is no madder than a man talking nonsense not to himself."
  216. Mod +1 Pedantic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you secretly the Joke Explaining Troll?

  217. umm... help me by zoloto · · Score: 1

    send them to my server? contact me and we'll work out a deal to where I can compensate you for your efforts.

    --zo *use my GPG key below!

  218. Did anyone else read this the same way??? by brent_linux · · Score: 1
    AP: Why did you change your mind and decide to put the original three movies out on DVD now?

    Lucas: Just because the market has shifted so dramatically. A lot of people are getting very worried about piracy. That has really eaten dramatically into the sales. It really just came down to, there may not be a market when I wanted to bring it out, which was like, three years from now. So rather than just sit by and watch the whole thing fall apart, better to bring it out early and get it over with.
    Translation: I needed to get this out, before it was too late to make money on it.
  219. But what is the comment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps it was because of the brevity of your 'inspired social commentary'. You didn't add anything new to the discussion. You didn't even add anything old. And if you want to echo the 'general tone' of what's been said already in a new thread then your post was actually redundant, don't you think? So piss off, you kneebiter!

  220. Half finished by mofolotopo · · Score: 1

    He kept saying that he had to leave the others half finished, and that this was his attempt to finish them. If that's truly the case, we should fire out a petition to get him to just stop wherever he is on the new one and release it now, as it's clearly better if he doesn't put too much work into his movies.

  221. Obviously Never Used BitTorrent by meehawl · · Score: 1, Troll

    The other movie, it's on VHS, if anybody wants it. ... I'm not going to spend the, we're talking millions of dollars here, the money and the time to refurbish that, because to me, it doesn't really exist anymore.

    This is obvious bunk. The original versions were cleaned up dramatically, both picture and sound, for the Ultimate Edition Laserdiscs, or whatever they called them. And there are some very, very, very fine DVD conversions (and Divx versions!) of the LD editions floating around as torrents. So Lucas's weird wish that they be confined just to old mouldering VHS is just fantasy. He doesn't even acknowledge the existence of Laserdisc, and all the late-80s/early-90s high-quality Star Wars releases. My God, a guy I know even has a Videodisc edition of the Trilogy and it looks very fine. Anyway, this interview once again illustrated to me that Lucas is indeed a man devoid of shame.

    --

    Da Blog
  222. Many films go extinct anyway.... by winwar · · Score: 1

    Well, most movies tend to decompose sitting in vaults somewhere, especially if they aren't popular... Film isn't a stable medium-that is the reason it often has to be restored even if stored properly. And Star Wars wasn't an excellent movie-it had stellar effects for the time, but only a mediocre (recycled) plot. Very popular, yes, fun to watch, yes, very good, no.

    Right or wrong, movies don't belong to the public only to their owners who can do to them as they like... Sure, it may be part of our popular culture but I don't think copyright makes too many allowances for that. If you don't like that, become involved in politics.

    1. Re:Many films go extinct anyway.... by WNight · · Score: 1

      The point of offering copyright protection is that society gets to use the work when it comes out of protection - we help the authors in order to encourage them to create more works that eventually become ours.

      Copyright is currently instituted by dishonest and dirty judges (See 2600, linking to DeCSS case, where the judge used to work for Time Warner) at the command of their corporate masters. Money talks.

  223. A little late... by WiseWeasel · · Score: 1

    You're a little late on that one, people have been doing it for a while...
    http://movie-nite.com/sw.html

    --
    "I like systems, their application excepted", George Sand (French)
  224. Biggs by easyfrag · · Score: 1

    Anyone know if Luke's friend Biggs will reappear in this installment?

  225. What I'd like to see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like to see the Hong Kong movie industry or the Coen brothers do their own Star Wars film. Lucas and his band of a**-kissers are way past their prime.

  226. Box, Box, what is 'Box'? by IBitOBear · · Score: 1

    Yes, they all stand outside the box, thinking how cool it would be to actually play with the merchandise, and lamenting the waste of money that going into the box represents.

    That is the _apotheosis_ of thinking outside the box... 8-)

    --
    Innocent people shouldn't be forced to pay for inferior software development.
    --"Code Complete" Microsoft Press
  227. Precious George by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not too hard in this case. Take the cleaned up masters, put them on DVD.

    Once he got that he could sell EACH movie as a boxed set with the original, a directors cut, and his precious Special Edition. He'd make a mint. He's just too caught up in his "artistness"

  228. FFS by neolithic-au · · Score: 1

    Clearly he has remastered the originals. How else would he have had the footage and sound to change?

    Star Wars is just another cash cow he's going to milk until it's driven into the ground. In the mean time, the Laserdisc to DVD versions should be okay.

    Also, on the television thing, I seem to recall reading a quote that read something like "I wouldn't want it (Star Wars) to turn into Star Trek".

    And then he goes on with good old Spieldy to testify in Congress about the use of CG to modify films?

    NICE CREDIBILITY BUDDY.

    He just keeps contradicting himself.

  229. Chinatown by swankypimp · · Score: 2, Funny

    Leia: Luke, I am your mother!
    Luke: Wait, you said you were my sister. I want the truth! (slap)
    Leia: I'm your mother! (slap) I'm your sister! (slap) Your mother, your sister-- I'm both!
    ...
    Luke: Leia, put the blaster down, let the stormtroopers take care of this!
    Leia: But don't you see? Vader owns the stormtroopers! (Leia mounts a speeder, goes about ten feet and dies gruesomely.)
    Luke: Noooooo!!! Noooooo!!!
    Han: Forget it Luke-- it's Tatooine.
    (Roll credits.)

    --

    --All your stolen base are belong to Rickey Henderson
  230. Reminds me of Raiders of the lost ark sound park by EMR · · Score: 1

    Where the kids go on a campain to save movies from their directors and the "re-re-releases" of movies.. Where the "guns where replace with walkie talkies" and "the term wookie was replaced with ...." etc.. etcc..

    Lucas just RELEASE the originals and maybe people will see your 3rd star wars movie!!

  231. decode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mvdbt dibohfe uif dboujob tdfof tp uibu hsffep, uif cpvouz ivoufs uibo Ibo xbtufe xjuipvu b tfdpoe uipvhiu gjsfe gjstu.

    Lucas changed the cantina scene so that greedo, the bounty hunter that Han wasted without a second thought fired first.

    Xmd erscl onesce smr.

  232. "No hand, no job" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, tell me about it. Especially since I'm in love with my sister.

  233. April fools! You've just been had, dude... by hkmwbz · · Score: 1
    That doesn't appear to be Lucas speaking, and indeed, the filename of the embedded stream is "aprilfools_greedo_04.wvx".

    April fools :)

    --
    Clever signature text goes here.
  234. Yeah sure.... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    The cheesy, new agey music they put in the end of the third movie replacing the original, did not exist back there, it was not possible to write cheesy pseudo irish music back then.

    That is what I call progress.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  235. Would it have been right... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    ... of Picasso to change Guernica 40 or 50 years later?

    There are things that may be possible and legal.

    That does not mean they are also wise and moral.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  236. If Picasso would have done that... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    .... it would have been his choice and right.

    But that would not mean he was taking the correct decission or that he was doing something morally correct.

    Take the Guernica for example. That painting had a cultural impact the engulfs our full understanding of the horrors of WWII.

    If Picasso had decided to change it in any way after it was completed it would have amounted to vandalism, since the work entered that thing called popular culture.

    But that is copyrights for you, in their current form they clearly damage the culture of the world as a whole.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  237. Get lost matey. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    It is not like somebody sat in front of you and pressed the link to read the posts on this thread.

    How more pathetic can some people get?

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  238. Re: Review of Trilogy DVD by amalthia · · Score: 2, Informative

    For a laugh check out this sarcastic review of the Trilogy DVD which includes a "HAN SHOOTS FIRST" / HAN VERSUS GREEDO SCENE: http://www.toastedpixel.com/starwars/anewhope.html

  239. Pterry on The Carpet People by Sunnan · · Score: 1

    "It's not exactly the book I wrote then. It's not exactly the book I'd write now. It's a joint effort but, heh heh, I don't have to give him [Pratchett's younger self] half the royalties. He'd only waste them."

    Terry Pratchett on his revisions to The Carpet People.

  240. Re:but what happens when Han wlaks over jabbas tai by SlippyToad · · Score: 1
    The scene wasn't even in the original version, and Jabba was portrayed as a human.

    Actually, he was going to stick in an animated character but ran out of money/reason to do it. The human actor was only ever intended to be a standin. I remember seeing the footage years ago. What's kind of depressing about this is simply that the shine has come off. The originals worked because they were consistent. He keeps going back and jacking with that consistency, and it's jarring.

    --
    One day I feel I'm ahead of the wheel / the next it's rolling over me / I can get back on / I can get back on
  241. Who shoots first - you decide by danila · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    There is no reason why someone can't take the newly released movies, the DVD-R versions of the old films (from the LD) and combine them into precisely what they want. Making Han shoot first is trivial! Furthermore, the examples of Episode I.I: The Phantom Edit and The Two Towers: The Purist Edit show that you can do much more with the footage provided by the director.

    --
    Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  242. It's not crap, it's a marketing opportunity by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    For instance, in the original Star Wars SE, it's pretty obvious that Jabba the Hutt is a poorly rendered CGI blob. I notice this right off the bat, and it destroys the illusion. On the other hand, if I watch RotJ, released in the dark ages of the 1980s, Jabba's merely a "primitive" puppet, but damnit he seems real.

    Don't worry - there will be a "Very Special Edition" in 2010 with a Jabba that looks like the original, only CGI rendered.

    This will be the only version available in HD.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  243. While we're remastering things... by napesjp · · Score: 1

    I heard Lucas will be removing the scene in Raiders of the Lost Ark where Indy shoots first.

  244. Re:The future... by Progman3K · · Score: 1

    You have to remember that the art belongs to the artist and it's the artist's vision that he is trying to do justice to, not yours.

    It's not that I don't feel for you; I think the original movies were sweet in a way BECAUSE they left a lot for our imaginations to fill in!

    That's why the whole mythology could fit your hopes and dreams so closely.

    Everyone's hopes and dreams.

    we all filled in the blanks so nobly for the same reason we were drawn to the story in the first place.

    Anyhow, I remember how I felt, and I still feel that way today, it lit the way for me, and that,s still valuable.

    --
    I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J