Slashdot Mirror


How to Leave a Job on Good Terms?

An anonymous reader writes "I've been working for a small development company for 6 or 7 years. My boss has always been a bit nuts but overall it hasn't been a bad experience. I recently accepted a great job offer for a technology position in a different industry. I gave my boss my notice this week, and while he initially was understanding, he has since starting making accusations of conspiracy, deceit, and has otherwise attempted to make me look bad in front of employees and long-time clients. (who, thankfully, also think he is nuts) I don't like to burn bridges, but I'm pretty sure he's already burned it to the ground, even threatening to withhold my final paycheck if I don't find a replacement before I leave. Is it worth sticking out the few weeks I already told him I worked, or should I just cut my losses and leave early?"

755 comments

  1. My two cents... by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 5, Insightful



    My boss has always been a bit nuts...


    Been there...I sympathize.

    ...while he initially was understanding, he has since starting making accusations of conspiracy, deceit, and has otherwise attempted to make me look bad in front of employees and long-time clients.


    There is no excuse for this sort of behavior. Period. Next time he tries to do it, confront him. Remember, at this point, he needs you a lot more than you need him.


    I don't like to burn bridges, but I'm pretty sure he's already burned it to the ground, even threatening to withhold my final paycheck if I don't find a replacement before I leave.


    You know, strictly speaking, it is his responsibility to find a replacement for your position, not yours. You should remind him of this in no uncertain terms.


    Is it worth sticking out the few weeks I already told him I worked or should I just cut my losses and leave early?"


    Just remember that giving a company notice before you leave is not a requirement...it is a courtesy you are extending as part of a positive professional relationship. Frankly, I'd ask him for a letter of recommendation up front, and if he refuses, or threatens to give you a less than optimal review, you simply do not owe him the courtesy of notice.



    In short, don't devalue yourself, and don't let him devalue you, either.




    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    1. Re:My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually, I wouldn't be surprised if you may (in certain situations) be contractually obligated to give notice in good time.

    2. Re:My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just remember that giving a company notice before you leave is not a requirement...it is a courtesy

      Note that this is not true in all jurisdictions. In Ireland, for example (probably one of the more american-like european jurisdictions!), companies and employees both can contractually require one month's notice on "contracts of service" i.e. employees (as opposed to "contracts for service" i.e. contractors), and typically do: in cases where you're "resigning" suddenly (i.e. in america you'd be fired), you typically "take all your remaining annual paid leave" for the month, to get you off-premises earlier.

    3. Re:My two cents... by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 5, Informative

      ...while he initially was understanding, he has since starting making accusations of conspiracy, deceit, and has otherwise attempted to make me look bad in front of employees and long-time clients.

      There is no excuse for this sort of behavior. Period. Next time he tries to do it, confront him. Remember, at this point, he needs you a lot more than you need him.


      Speaking from a point of view of someone who spent years working with people in therapy, it sounds like this person has some issues that go deeper than the anger and frustration most people deal with. While I would normally advocate standing up for yourself (which isn't necessarily a confrontation), that fact that you start by saying he's always been a little nuts makes me suspect any confrontation will blow up.

      In simple terms, it sounds like he's in denial over what's going on and blames you. In his mind, he probably already sees you as disloyal and even out to get him. This is not a reasonable view, but everything you say fits with that possibility. If that is so, anything you do will be viewed as an attack, and only add fuel to his fire of hate. So if you confront him, there's a chance he could blow up, start calling you names, or just walking away, then burning you in some other way.

      Only you can decide what is and is not important to you. At this point, he's made it clear he considers it okay to withhold your paycheck. I can't tell if it's a bluff, or if he's serious (from what little we have here), but be aware that he is likely holding it hostage. Normally a boss thinks he has control becasue he can fire someone or stop paying them. With only a short time left, he feels he can no longer control you, so he's using that paycheck as his way to make sure you stay in line.

      While it sounds lame, you might be best to try to difuse the situations with humor -- just not at his expense. Or, if he trashes you in front of a crowd of employees or clients, and you feel a need to stick up for yourself, you can always say something like, "He's been treating me that way ever since I turned in my notice,' and try to make it into a joke. He won't take it well, though.

    4. Re:My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'd also add that it might be a good idea to send letters/emails of appreciation to your co-workers and the clients of your company. Don't say anything negative AT ALL in the letter, focus only on the positives you believe you have experienced in the company. Go over your reasons for making the job change(don't mention money, focus on the positive opportunities you see yourself as having at the new company) and express your heartfelt gratitude for having gotten to work with and gotten to know such excellent people. Make sure everyone you have more than a "hi/bye" interaction with gets a copy. Including your boss.

      This way, no matter what he says, people get to hear from you your reasons and get to hear from you the positive experiences you're taking away from the position. This will foster "warm fuzzy feelings" among many who might only ever hear "his side".

      Let me stress, don't be negative in that letter/email at all. It is imperative that you not be negative at all.

    5. Re:My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      First and foremost make sure as many people as possible see you trying to be reasonable with him and see him being erratic.

      The reason for this is twofold. Witnesses if you go to court over the paychecks (I'm sure he'll back down) and also just in case he says something personal in an attempt for you to lose your cool so he has an excuse for his ridiculous attitude.

      Remember that you have the upper hand in this since you already have a job to go to whereas your boss has to find someone good enough to replace you. If the worst comes to worst staying for an extra week isn't a bad idea since then he can't honestly say that you screwed him over.

      You might also want to put someone else other than him as a reference on your resume since I doubt from the picture you gave that he is likely to give a good impression of you if he's like this over you leaving. Look for a co-worker or another line manager you've worked with if possible to use as the reference.

      Finally, if trying to be rational with him doesn't work you can always put superglue in his car doorlock - a couple of months after you leave of course.

    6. Re:My two cents... by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 0



      that fact that you start by saying he's always been a little nuts makes me suspect any confrontation will blow up.


      OK...let me be a little clearer here. I never advocated that the writer challenge the manager's sanity. In fact, personal attacks like this will most certainly only make the situation immeasurably worse.

      When I advocated confrontation, I advocated that the writer challenge the manager to substantiate the claims of deceit and conspiracy, or admit that they are groundless. Personally, I believe that the first confrontation should be done in private, and then, if the behavior continues, confront him in front of the clients.

      Every time the manager levels these false accusations, he is doing significant damage to the writer's professional reputation. This cannot be allowed to continue.

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    7. Re:My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems you have enough between your ears for everyone.

    8. Re:My two cents... by larien · · Score: 1

      Depends on (a) local laws and (b) whatever contract you signed. (a) will be the default which may be over-ridden by (b).

    9. Re:My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " Depends on (a) local laws and (b) whatever contract you signed. (a) will be the default which may be over-ridden by (b)."

      You can rarely (i.e. never unless someone has a counter example) wave your employment rights. These laws exist to prevent the powerful praying on the weak, and they would not help if the weak could be compelled to simply wave them.

    10. Re:My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My position was "eliminated" 6 months ago with no notice...after 6 years of dedicated service...so tell this guy to F-off in no uncertain terms. You'll feel better after you do...

    11. Re:My two cents... by Rasta+Prefect · · Score: 1
      I don't like to burn bridges, but I'm pretty sure he's already burned it to the ground, even threatening to withhold my final paycheck if I don't find a replacement before I leave.

      You know, strictly speaking, it is his responsibility to find a replacement for your position, not yours. You should remind him of this in no uncertain terms.

      Also, while labor laws vary of state to state, theres generally some sort of "Thou shalt deliver the last paycheck within x days" sort of clause.

      --
      Why?
    12. Re:My two cents... by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 5, Insightful

      OK...let me be a little clearer here. I never advocated that the writer challenge the manager's sanity. In fact, personal attacks like this will most certainly only make the situation immeasurably worse.

      Maybe not, but it all depends on how the boss perceives it. For example, soon after I left teaching in treatment programs, I worked as a property manager for someone in serious need of therapy. He was an alcoholic in denial, as well as gay and in denial (he had relationships, but went to absurd lengths to hide them -- it would have been comical if this person wasn't so sick). One time a property owner called up, asking me a ton of questions about a problem with one of his properties we managed. It turned out later that the problem was caused because my boss (the drunk) had not done his job. I didn't know that at the time, so when the boss (who was in the room listening) didn't hear me take full blame for everything immediately, once I hung up, he started yelling at me, saying I screwed up and was blaming him -- and that I was out to get him and his job.

      If you want to analyze it, he knew he screwed up, but couldn't accept it, so since he "knew" it was his fault, even without me knowing it -- or accusing, or anything, in his eyes, since I did not just roll over and take it, he assumed I knew it was him, and was trying to blame him. To you and I, it doesn't make sense, but to him, it did.

      I'm not trying to argue with you, but I am pointing out that there is enough to make me (a former pro in dealing with people who need treatment) suspect there is a problem with this boss. What you and I see as a challenge, the boss very likely will see as an attack. It doesn't have to be an attack, it doesn't have to look like one -- all it takes to set a person like this off is for him, in his twisted mind, to see it as an attack. I've seen many people in treatment (or in need of treatment) who have lied through their teeth, and all it took was one person even vaguely suggesting one of their lies was not 100% correct to set that person off.

      Yes, he's making false accusations, but in the post, the writer made it clear the clients and employees knew the boss was nuts. If he can gracefully difuse the situation, and continue to act with integrity, none of them will have any question who is professional and trustworthy. Don't act under the assumption that because someone is calling names, those names reflect at all on the "callee". More than anything, and this seems especially true in this case, they make the boss look unreasonable and unprofessional, and as long as the person being insulted acts with dignity and integrity, he will look better (especially in the long run) by not attacking.

      It's like if a kid attacks you -- if you deck him, you look terrible. If you maintain your dignity and do as little as possible to fend him off, you look much better. That's because we all know the kid is at a disadvantage, and here it seems quite obvious the boss is like a kid -- at least emotionally.

      Normally I would agree with you, but this boss seems unstable, and with such a person, as I said (and it bears repeating), something that, to you and I, seems not only reasonable but also appropriate could be perceived as an attack by him -- especially if it comes anywhere near threatening his twisted perception of reality.

    13. Re:My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bosses sometimes turn into S.O.B.'s, resorting to all kinds of cheap tricks to belittle employees, just for the hell of it.
      The people that are left behind are the unfortunate ones, living and working under the thumb of this tyrant. The above post is right on the money.

    14. Re:My two cents... by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is only one of MANY posts about the last paycheck. Some go so far as to say sue him. Some say talk to HR, but the company might be so small the boss might own it.

      Since the boss is emotionally unstable (I mentioned that earlier in this thread), it might be unwise to mention anything about the check ahead of time. Go by to pick it up at the regular time, as you always would, as if nothing were wrong. If it's not there, ask him about it. If he tries holding it back, then it is time to take action. You're best off being understated. Just shrug and say, "Okay, I'll take it up with the Labor Board, under section xxx" (if you can cite a section, that might help).

      If there is an HR department, go there first, if not, or after HR, then go to the state (or other appropriate authority) and file a complaint. Make sure you have a copy of the letter or form. It might help to show it to the boss, and that may be all you need, but if he is volitile, just stay away and wait until the authorities handle it.

      If he "officially" tells you ahead of time he's withholding it (instead of just threatening), ask him why and see if you can get it in writing. In either case, document it clearly, write up a letter to complain to either HR or the labor board, and, on the last day, bring it up before you leave. Again, be understated, but know that you WILL get the check, it's just a question of when and whether he gives it to you or has to deal with HR or the authorities. Don't be cocky, just sure. If necessary, tell him what you've been told by HR or the labor board. Don't be a know it all, but say just enough to let him know you have resources.

      Now, on the other hand, if at any time in this process he starts to act unstable, GET OUT. Your goal should be to get the check, not to confront him, piss him off, or prove to him you're right. If you can keep your ego out of this, you'll do great. If you let your ego lead you, you'll end up in a blow out with him, and it'll make it even harder to get the check.

    15. Re:My two cents... by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 4, Informative


      I see where you're coming from....I was making the assumption that this manager, while superfically unreasonable, is fundamentally capable of rational thought, while you're reminding us that that assumption may not be valid.

      This is indeed a troubling scenario...in most situations, the best course would be to smile and nod, and walk on eggshells around him. However, in this situation, this potentially unbalanced person has the ability to cause serious damage to the writer's professional reputation and career. Another poster on this topic made the statement that the only thing a technical profesional really possesses is their reputation...a point with which I agree wholeheartedly.

      To borrow your analogy of a kid attacking you, as long as he is unarmed, you may be able to safely ignore him, but if he starts attacking with a club, knife, or gun (in short, if his attacks now have the potential to cause real damage), you are within your rights to protect your own well-being.

      Clearly, if the manager is indeed unbalanced, the writer has a very fine line to walk for the next couple weeks. in this situation, the only constructive advice I can offer is to make every attempt to appear as the rational and reasonable party...while still taking the necessary steps to defend one's professional reputation.

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    16. Re:My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i have an butthead for a boss, and when i give my notice, it will be while i'm on vacation (and actually settling in at the new job), and given with 2 weeks left of it...

      that way i wont have to deal with the unpredictable reaction from the boss.. he has assaulted and threatened employees in the past.. so i am not takin' any chances...

    17. Re:My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget all the legal garbage. You can file a complaint with the proper authority and get paid for any work performed. Past that, what are the two of going to do, file a bunch of lawsuits and waste your time (and money)?

      Just be positive, turn the other cheek, live up to spirit of the notice you gave and leave peacefully. You cannot beat the system. This guy got where he is for some reason, don't fight it. Being polite and professional will do more to eat at this moron's gut than anything.

    18. Re:My two cents... by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Here's my $0.02.

      Unless that final paycheque is big, BIG bucks - walk out the door and don't come back.

      Really, is the stress and bullshit worth the money? If it's gonna be a month or so, put your expenses on a credit card for a month (keep 'em reasonable), and just pay it off when you get the new job.

      In the meantime, you owe yourself some R&R by the sound of it, so take a month (or whatever) off and enjoy life :P

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    19. Re:My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, strictly speaking, it is his responsibility to find a replacement for your position, not yours. You should remind him of this in no uncertain terms.

      Maybe in America, but potentially this post could be from any legality. Therefore my advice would be to check the employment contract to check what is there, and *then* confront the boss. Remember that the contact of employment should also be agreed to by the company, and as such the boss chap should find it hard to argue against.

      Finally, get your Human Resources department involved if needed. That is what they are there for in part, and may have good advice or be able to mediate or fight your corner if needed.

    20. Re:My two cents... by saltydogdesign · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Speaking from a point of view of someone who spent years working with people in therapy, it sounds like this person has some issues that go deeper than the anger and frustration most people deal with.

      It's called "boss-itis." I think all bosses are required to suffer from metal ailments.

      I used to work at a magazine. Our editor in chief would call the entire staff into a conference room and harangue us for up to four hours because he found a typo in an article (before it was printed). One typo could cause him to say that we were "worthless," "useless," "unprofessional," "shit," and many other such fine terms.

      Meanwhile, our work would not be getting finished, leaving us more pressed for time and more likely to make mistakes.

      The guy was a lunatic, and it extended beyond work. When he first met my wife, I introduced her and said she was an opera singer (she is). The first words out of his mouth were, "I don't really like music with women's voices." What an ass.

      --
      // This is not a sig.
    21. Re:My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually giving notice is a contractural requirement in many many cases, not courtesy, you walk out, you can get sued for breach of contract simple as that.

    22. Re:My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    23. Re:My two cents... by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      Who cares if the boss blows up or not? It's not within the writer's responsibility to find a replacement *or* cool off his boss's temper. He's leaving, he put in his two weeks notice like a gentleman, and if his boss can't understand that then who cares? He has plenty of legal options if his boss continues to be an ass-hat.

      If it were me, I'd handle it like this.

      1. Get written recommendations from co-workers and sub-bosses (if there are any).
      2. Don't give him any reason to get crazier. If he confronts you, stand your ground. He has no hold over you and is trying to intimidate you into doing his will. Part of that will is finding a replacement which isn't your job.
      3. Talk to HR and see if you can bolt down your last check.
      4. If things get too hot, be prepared to walk. Go ahead and take all the star wars toys out of your cubicle early along with anything else not 100% necessary to get your job done. This will show everyone you're serious. It may also suggest to your boss that you're ready to walk at a moment's notice. That could drive the point home and cause him to reconsider his approach to you leaving. After all, you're obviously a valuable asset.
      5. Suggest to your boss or your boss's boss that perhaps it'd be more constructive to focus on finding a new guy rather than fucking with you.

    24. Re:My two cents... by iwadasn · · Score: 1


      I agree. You give two weeks notice as a coutresy and (lets be honest) in exchange for a good reccomendation. If you think they won't give you a good rec. (and it doesn't look like they will), or they are squirrly enough that you can't count on a good rec from them, then you don't owe them anything. Tell them to ---- off, and write a letter to your state AG if they even think about trying to withhold a paycheck.

    25. Re:My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Who cares if the boss blows up or not? It's not within the writer's responsibility to find a replacement *or* cool off his boss's temper.

      Yeah, well, getting started on that next job is going to suck when you're sitting in jail for stealing office supplies. Of course after you're let out, the boss will be doing the accounting and it turns out that the ledger's off by a bit over $500, back into the court system you go. What are you going to tell your next boss "sorry, man, I know I just started here but I need a few days off to defend myself in court?"

    26. Re:My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      If you don't get your final paycheck, just call the state Department of Labor and tell them you are having trouble getting the check, and ask them to intervene. Be nice, and don't say anything critical of the employer. I've done this once each in two different states. Each time a DOL rep called my former employer just to ask what was up. Both times I had my check within days.

      But if that fails, then go for the formal complaint. Before you leave the job make sure you have documentation for all your hours.

    27. Re:My two cents... by runningduck · · Score: 1

      Contact HR. Unless this is a really small company, HR will have a proceedure in place to handle such a situation.

      --
      -rd
    28. Re:My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this guy's mental issues are NOT YOUR PROBLEM. It matters not whether he is in denial, etc.. last time I looked, being in denial was not considered a valid ground for failing to pay an employee. Contract means contract.

      Depending on the size of the sum concerned, I would definitely consider a lawyers letter.

    29. Re:My two cents... by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 2, Informative
      Only you can decide what is and is not important to you. At this point, he's made it clear he considers it okay to withhold your paycheck. I can't tell if it's a bluff, or if he's serious (from what little we have here), but be aware that he is likely holding it hostage. Normally a boss thinks he has control becasue he can fire someone or stop paying them. With only a short time left, he feels he can no longer control you, so he's using that paycheck as his way to make sure you stay in line.

      Whatever he thinks, it's not OK to withhold the check for work performed. If he's slandering an employee and ultimately follows through on the threat to withhold pay, lawyer up and contact the company's legal department, and see how fast they capitulate.

    30. Re:My two cents... by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I was making the assumption that this manager, while superfically unreasonable, is fundamentally capable of rational thought, while you're reminding us that that assumption may not be valid.

      That's about it. Thanks -- you summarized it MUCH better than I did.

      It's also important to remember a person like this may show rational thought in many areas, but still be emotionally unbalanced in others.

      Yes, I agree about a reputation being important, and this boss can hurt it, but from what we have, it seems most people around him are aware that the boss has issues. I would also think that people who worked with him for a while would easily know the score. Yes, the manager does have a weapon, but if everyone is aware he is toons (no, that was never a term we used technically!), it is less effective.

      FWIW, in the job I mentioned, the firm had been around for over 20 years. At one time it had a good reputation, but over the past 10 years they had earned a reputation in their area (which was a poor area of houses as old as pre-civil war and was undergoing gentrification) as being cheap, cheating the tenent, and even abusing their authority. My boss, and his boss (the owner) were largely responsible for that. There were only the three of us in the company, and about 6 months after I started, the owner died. About 5 months later, with my boss running the company and the executrice (sp?) of the will still not having sold the company, I found out I would not get a paycheck that week -- legal problems, the estate being in debt, etc. While they admitted owning me, they did not have the money to pay. I asked how much they were selling the company for, and got on the phone. I seriously considered talking to my family, getting the backing, buying the company, and firing my boss.

      This is appropos because my boss was largely responsible for the bad reputation of the company and many people in the area had dealt with him and specifically cursed him in public (and quite often!). I made a lot of calls and found out that in the 11 months I had been there, I had developed quite a reputation. I never bragged or badmouthed my company or boss, but the whole area basically had the attitude of, "Don't deal with the company, but if you have to, deal with him -- he'll treat you as fair as you can, unless his boss won't let him."

      In less than a year, while I was working for a company with a crappy reputation, everyone in the area basically knew I would stick to my word and they could trust me, while nobody trusted my boss (who, at almost 50, was known to run out of the front office and literally hide in a closet when certain tenents or property owners came in to handle business).

      So, while I'm bias, and speaking of a unique situation, would I would think most people will know the score and separate the boss's anger from the employee's responsibility. They've already had a lot of time to see what's going on. And, if he maintains his dignity, often it is possible to make sure you act properly as the other person gets more and more irrational, then, without saying anything negative, you've held up, and the other person has ruined their rep by getting angry because he wouldn't play their game.

    31. Re:My two cents... by pediddle · · Score: 2, Informative

      If that paycheck is big bucks, I would recommend you do walk away and never come back.

      If he withholds your paycheck, he's in deep shit. In Washington state, and I imagine other places, having your paycheck withheld automatically entitles you to double the amount, plus punitive damages.

      He simply has no right to threaten such an act. If I were you, I'd say, "I dare you...". In any case, investigate your rights in this matter. You might be in a position to burn some more bridges yet come out with a lot of dough in your pockets.

      (IANAL.)

    32. Re:My two cents... by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Who cares if the boss blows up or not?

      The employee does.

      1) The boss can hold back the check until he's legally forced to pay, which could take weeks or months.
      2) This boss, from what we've seen, shows many signs of being unstable. Violence is even a possibility.
      3) The manager can swear out a warrant for any number of reasons. They may be false, but by the time it's straightened out, it might be after a night or two in jail. (And you can't always sue for false arrest.)
      4) We dont' know how big a company is, so there may be no HR department or anyone with authority over this person, so he can easily lose records or time slips.
      5) Sometimes a new job is contigent on the new job checking, either after acceptance of the job, or after leaving the last one, on performance at the old job.
      6) While an offer has been made, it is possible it could be retracted if they hear he didn't bother to work through the notice he gave.
      7) There are any of a number of other ways a boss who has lost his temper can make life miserable.

      You never win by making someone angry. All it means is there is just one more person out there who wants to see you hurt. What is the point in having that?

    33. Re:My two cents... by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      "You never win by making someone angry."

      The point here is that since this guy is unstable and possibly crazy, it's not your responsibility to keep him happy. That's why I said who cares if he blows up. Let him blow up in a room full of clients, it'll expose him as the jackass he is and probably make him think twice about his behavior and maybe, just maybe, make him consider apologizing to the original writer.

    34. Re:My two cents... by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 1

      His issues are not the employee's problem.

      But the many nasty things the boss can do because of his issues are. So if you want to ignore his problems, fine, but if that leads to him making things worse for you, then it is your fault. If you (that's a generic "you") make an unstable boss like this upset, he can do quite a bit to hurt you -- including file warrants over accounts, theft of office supplies, and many other things. Yes, you'll get it straight -- after spending time in jail, arranging bail, and giving up several days of your life. Yes, you MIGHT be able to sue for false arrest, but that may or may not make a difference and, in the mean time, you've had to deal with these problems while trying to start a new job.

      So while his issues are not YOUR problem, they can lead to his actions causing your problem, and possibly even costing you that new job. He doesn't need a valid reason to not pay the employee. He just doesn't have to pay him. He can ignore HR (assuming the company is big enough to have HR), ignore his boss for a long time, and even drag out responses to the labor board. You can gloat and insist on the contract, but it is just possible, when you're dealing with an unstable person, that he can refuse to act and drag out giving that last check to you for a LONG time -- making it miserable for you through the whole thing.

      Lawyers charge money -- even for a letter. It doesn't hurt a mature person to be polite and not threaten. When and if the boss actually witholds or "officially" states he'll withhold the check, then there are a number of things to do before dealing with a lawyer. If the boss is unstable, and he sees such a letter (from a lawyer), it may just make him angry enough to withhold the check, drag out responses to the labor board, and to ask for continuations of any court case until you've spent more than the amount of the check to get it.

      So, again, why ignore the possibility that he has issues, when it is likely to just cause him to make more trouble? What do you win?

    35. Re:My two cents... by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Is that assuming the company is big enough to have a legal department? Or that the boss isn't the company owner? (Or the owner's brother-in-law?)

      You're right, it's not okay to withhold. But people often do things that aren't okay. It's also best not to use other "force" until the boss has actually "officially" said he'll withhold the check, or does. Then there's many things that can be done -- and the last thing I'd do is contact a lawyer (and that's from someone with a good number of lawyer friends and clients).

    36. Re:My two cents... by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      You're assuming the original poster is in an employment-at-will jurisdiction. In many places, for example much of Europe, it's quite normal and perfectly legal for employment contracts to require notice periods by both parties prior to termination under normal circumstances. It's also common to include a "garden leave" clause where an employer who's letting you go may require you not to attend work during your notice period (for example to prevent further access to confidential company information) and provisions for immediate dismissal in the event of gross misconduct. In many ways, the notice-is-normal approach is far superior to employment-at-will for all concerned; it implies a certain level of mutual responsibility that can only be constructive in an employer-employee relationship.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    37. Re:My two cents... by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 1

      And, again, if he blows up, he's angry. If he's angry, he'll want to act on it. It's not your responsibility to keep him happy, but if he gets angry at you, he can do a lot of things to make you miserable. If he files a warrant, do you want to be in jail or arranging bail on what should be your first day of a new job?

      It's not your job to keep him happy, but it is also wise not to do things that will egg him on. This isn't about who has what right or responsibility. It's about understanding how people behaving and handling the situation with enough maturity to not make it worse.

      So, again, why make him angry, since you don't gain anything from it, and you may find it causes you a lot of trouble.

    38. Re:My two cents... by SeventyBang · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree completely - and will add more:

      What would you do if you had a girlfriend you were trying to break up with who started doing this stuff [to you]? This is separation anxiety[1]. It's being done to manipulate you. If you start feeling wishy-washy or give any indication of it (including telling anyone else there, you're going to encourage it because he'll know it's working.

      [1] toddlers have the same problem when Mommy, whom Timmy has relied upon being there all of the time, is stepping out for the evening.

      Talk to your co-workers about everything after you've left over drinks some night. After you'e had a week or two to jump into your new job and your old office has settled down a bit. And if you are part of a herd departure (en masse), you can form a support group between those of you who have managed to get out to another job and supporting those who are still caught in the tar pit. Eventually, you can routinely have a "survivors' meeting" and keep an eye on what's going on - how many ads they've run and how long they've stayed open, etc.

      If he's going to trash you in front of everyone, it's like the old philosopher whose students come in and say, "Teacher! You won't believe the things they are saying about you on the streets!" "What are you going to do?" "Nothing. I live such that no one will believe it."

      Ever hear the phrase, "Wrestle with a pig and win-or-lose, you get dirty." ?

      The other thing you're doing is showing everyone else they can leave on their own as well. If you buckle under, they're going to feel as though they can't leave, either. Be a good example for everyone else. (unless you hate their guts)

      All but two or three states (sorry, I can't tell you which they are) have employment at will laws. This means they can walk in and can you sans notice and you can do the same to them. The issues of bias & discrimination then come in when you have to figure out if it was because of something they shouldn't have used.

      Counter-offers.
      These are worthless. You've made a commitment to someone else for a particular amount of money, etc. Backing down on that only shames you. And when your current employer finds you can be bought, you know what they think about you:

      A man walked up to a girl and asked her, "Would you sleep with me for $1M?"
      "Yes!" she said.
      "Would you sleep with me for $25?"
      "What kind of girl do you think I am?"
      "We've already established that. Now we're arguing price."

      Now. If you're ever in the driver's seat with your current employer and they make you a deal you can't resist, what's going to happen to you when they don't need you anny more?

      Oh, one other thing: exit interviews. Depending upon the circumstances, they can serve different purposes. If they've taken your feedback and general ideas over your time there and put it into effect, then an exit interview is a time to open up and provide feedback. If, however, you're getting out of there because you are getting out while you can before the pr%ck you are working for goes postal, an exit interview will largely be used to let you blow off steam and let you vent, hoping you won't air dirty laundry in the future, as that goes two ways: how they function as a company (business-wise) and how they work internally (employee-wise) - both can hurt a business' reputation in the public eye...horribly. If they are suddenly so interested in your feedback as an ex-employee, why weren't they routinely soliciting it as an employee - particularly once you start[ed] showing yourself to be a source of good ideas?

      All-in-all, it's a small, small world. You never know when something good or bad is going to come back and benefit or haunt you. It's as if the movie cameras are always running. I've had placement services contact me asking if I was the one who {did something good because someone passed good words} and they've contacted others because I've told them about {someone I know who has done well with...}

    39. Re:My two cents... by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's a few interesting stories about your boss. What shocks me is that people always forget the old addage that when there's one finger point at something, there are four fingers pointing back at the person pointing. For example, the four hour meetings say nothing about you and your peers, but they say a LOT about your boss. The same with his statement to your wife -- it doesn't reflect on her at all, but it says volumes about him.

      The man you describe is very insecure. He probably wakes up every morning feeling he isn't nearly as good as he wishes he were. He's probably perpetually scared that today is the day everyone will find out how scared he is and that he isn't what he wants everyone to believe is. Just think -- there's no need to wish for revenge on such a person. For him, waking up every morning and facing a full day of living with himself is a hell worse than any revenge I could ever wish on anyone.

    40. Re:My two cents... by guibaby · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you live in texas you are in reasonably good shape on the final paycheck thing.

      http://www.twc.state.tx.us/news/efte/texas_payday_ law_basics.html

      --
      Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels.
    41. Re:My two cents... by pilsner.urquell · · Score: 1

      Your boss can't hold back your paycheck, it's against the law! Being treated like scum is against the law too. I have a web page with some links. http://members.cox.net/yro.yro/at_work.html Don't be afraid to stand up for yourself.

    42. Re:My two cents... by Otter · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I'd also add that it might be a good idea to send letters/emails of appreciation to your co-workers and the clients of your company.

      You bring up an important point I haven't seen others mention -- not burning bridges isn't just about you and your boss, it's about everyone else involved, any of whom might be in a position to help or hurt you down the road.

    43. Re:My two cents... by SilverspurG · · Score: 1

      So that as long as the manager who's harassing you can wheedle in good with HR, he's free to harass you for as long as he likes and you still have to put up with a notice period should you decide to leave?

      No thanks. If someone's riding my backside with the blessing of the supposedly objective and impartial corporate overseers then I'm going to walk out the door on a dime notice.

      I have boots, camping gear, and a tent. I just don't care to put up with the BS anymore and I will walk if I'm pushed.

      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
    44. Re:My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work for the state unemployment office which shall remain nameless to protect the innocent. I have a "contact person" that handles Commerce Law. When claimants or soon-to-be claimants have a questions concerning the employer withholding checks or when they don't get paid, I refer them to the contact person.

      Guess what. I NEVER receive a call back from the claimant saying that they didn't get their check. So it DOES seem to be worthwhile to find out who is the person in charge of Commerce Laws in your state...

    45. Re:My two cents... by Threni · · Score: 1

      > There is no excuse for this sort of behavior. Period. Next time he tries to do
      > it, confront him. Remember, at this point, he needs you a lot more than you need
      > him.

      If the guy is nuts, then you're just wasting your time. He's not going to change the behaviour of a lifetime, even if it were under his control, which it probably isn't.

    46. Re:My two cents... by sheddd · · Score: 1

      I generally agree, but in a small business, HR folks typically do a crap job on tech hiring... as do many managers.

      If the poster is going to work out his two weeks (which I think he should unless the boss is going to be an ass), he may be the most capable person to find a replacement.

      From the article, I don't know how bad the boss has treated him since... if it's really bad, confront him and tell him you'll leave today unless you're treated like a professional...

      If he treats you from now to 2 weeks past notice, give him a hand and try and find a replacement.

      My $.02

    47. Re:My two cents... by SilverspurG · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When I left my last employer I gave no notice and informed my manager that I was taking my two weeks of vacation as I walked out the door.

      The HR department called me to say they would only honor my vacation request if I came in for an exit interview. I told them there was no way I was setting foot in their building again after the way I'd been treated. I put up with it for three years and, one day, made the decision that I'd had enough. It was like leaving a bad marriage with no money, no clothes, no where to live, and barely a suitcase under the arm.

      They wrote me off, denied my unemployment claim, and withheld the paycheck for the two weeks' vacation.

      Call a lawyer? I'd been so harassed and was so out of sorts at the time that no lawyer even wanted to talk to me. Truthfully, I wouldn't have wanted to talk to me at that time either.

      So where's all this hoidy-toidy legal rights junk now? I'm still paying for the mess that was created by a manager harassing an employee near to death.

      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
    48. Re:My two cents... by SeventyBang · · Score: 1

      oops. I didn't mean to use the name "Timmy" for separation anxiety when the original story was by Timothy.

    49. Re:My two cents... by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you live in texas you are in reasonably good shape on the final paycheck thing.

      Hell, in Texas you can probably shoot his ass for pulling shit like that.

    50. Re:My two cents... by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      What's all this 'filing a warrant' business you're going on about? I've never heard of bosses filing warrants against employees. Care to elaborate? Or is this coming from personal experience ;)

    51. Re:My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In simple terms, it sounds like he's in denial over what's going on and blames you. In his mind, he probably already sees you as disloyal and even out to get him. This is not a reasonable view, but everything you say fits with that possibility. If that is so, anything you do will be viewed as an attack, and only add fuel to his fire of hate. So if you confront him, there's a chance he could blow up, start calling you names, or just walking away, then burning you in some other way.

      In that case, the best response is to take his side. The next time he defames you, just go up to him with a hurt expression and, sincerely, ask him why he would say such things, and what you can do to allay his concerns.

      The parent is correct, don't push back. It's just like judo. Use the weight he throws at you and allow him to follow through.

    52. Re:My two cents... by bluGill · · Score: 1

      In the US two weeks is standard. However fired is a specail case, they stop payment the moment you walk out the door that day. Of course firing is a very strong term with legal meaning, companies almost never fire someone. Fired means there is a cause that they are letting you go, they are saying you are a bad employee. Some employees will turn around and sue for this, so companies only fire someone when all the paperwork has been double checked to prove that procedures were followed and the employee was bad.

      Even then, most companies will allow you to "resign for personal reasons", and pay you for two weeks where you do not come in, instead of firing you. (This means when asked they say you left on good terms, and thus your lawyer won't be looking over their documents to make sure things are in order)

      Otherwise things are the same. When a company decides they don't need you even though you are a good employee, they have to pay you for two weeks (this varies from state to state, but two weeks is typical). Most will pay you longer.

    53. Re:My two cents... by cuerty · · Score: 1

      Just remember that giving a company notice before you leave is not a requirement...it is a courtesy

      I don't know how is the legislation in that place, but in Argentina (where I live) it's a requirement of at least two weeks.
      In fact, one time, working for the goverment they told me that I've to stay at least for a month and find myself a replacement at least with the same skills as I do.

      --
      >Linux is not user-friendly.
      It _is_ user-friendly. It is not ignorant-friendly and idiot-friendly.
    54. Re:My two cents... by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      wow - withholding lawful payment is one of the reasos that you RUN to get a lawyer. hell, if you're compnay is even discussing the action, i think that you should have a short conversation with your family lawyer (you DO have one of those, right?) about what the proper response and documentation that you need to generate.

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    55. Re:My two cents... by pigscanfly.ca · · Score: 1

      Note: I am not a lawyer, but I did take and get a 70 in METHL100 (introduction to business law for math students).
      What you say is all well and good, but please keep in mind that in some places of the world giving your employer notice is manditory. In general in Ontario you are required to give your employer as much notice as they are required to give you, and this generally amounts to two weeks.
      Now I'm not sure about the laws where you are from, but it could very well effect the question asker.

    56. Re:My two cents... by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1
      So that as long as the manager who's harassing you can wheedle in good with HR, he's free to harass you for as long as he likes and you still have to put up with a notice period should you decide to leave?

      No; just as a company could usually fire someone immediately for something like misconduct or negligence, so an employee who's harrassed, discriminated against or otherwise mistreated could usually walk away without notice. In the UK, for example, this might lead to an industrial tribunal where the employee claims compensation for effectively being constructively dismissed, on the grounds that the employer broke the fundamental trust relationship with the employee. Rather less dramatically, there are typically legal obligations on an employer covering both grievance and disciplinary procedures. You're imagining a problem where in reality one doesn't really exist, and giving up on an altogether more professional and constructive employment system as a result.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    57. Re:My two cents... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      1. Withholding pay is ILLEGAL.
      Sorry it is just that simple.
      As to staying for the two weeks, I would if you can. In the end you have to do what you think is right. You have a new job, you have other relationships at the office besides your boss. Sometimes it is not about the money but doing what we think is right. In the end it is all up to you. If it is unbearable and doing more harm than good and you feel that you should leave then do so.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    58. Re:My two cents... by xiang+shui · · Score: 1

      In Canada (Alberta, anyway) this is also the case. Unless you've been working there for more less than 3 months, in which case no notice is required.

      Even if you don't give notice when you are required, however, the only thing your employer can do is withold (sp?) your cheque for another 10 days after your last day of employment.

    59. Re:My two cents... by SilverspurG · · Score: 1

      You could be missing the other possibility: Governments and the implementation of their various powers have proven to me, at least in today's world, to be not worth the paper they're printed on.

      You say that such a thing might lead to an industrial tribunal. In practice, however, how impartial are such tribunals? What is the cost barrier for representation? What are the various social stigmas which may follow an employee before, during, and after the proceedings of such a tribunal? For example, here in the States, if you want to take the legal route against an employer one had better pray the settlement is enough to hold you for a lifetime because very few companies will chance hiring an employee who has filed legal action against a former employer.

      Pretty words and useless legal promises aside... Let's talk about reality.

      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
    60. Re:My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have found that the smaller companies have the worst performance when it comes to hiring and retaining bad managers, maybe there is more nepotism and/or incompetance in smaller companies, whereas the larger ones will quickly identify bad people and bump them out or transfer them where they cant antagonise staff/customers.

      Regardless, the best way to pass your remaining weeks is to play it cool and let nothing get to you. Take your time doing your duties, dont be rushed into doing things or pressured into working overtime. If you are on the receiving end of abuse and other overt hostility, make it clear once to the person involved that you dont accept that sort of unprofessional behaviour. If it continues, report it to their manager, and if its still ongoing then ignore it from that point on - walk away from meetings, hang up on phone calls, or leave the room when you are being treated in an obnoxious way. Leave the building entirely, and go for a walk outside to bask in the sunshine for a while if you are really being hammered. Go read a book or listen to music in a nearby park, have a nice long lunch break.

      If that drives them to behave worse, dont worry about it. Countdown the days you have left, and savour the sweet heady euphoria of anticipation of leaving such a wretched den of scum and villainy behind you. Be relaxed, and at ease. If at any stage the harassment crosses over the line and becomes criminal ( like maybe they vandalise your car or threaten physical harm ), call the police. Its their job to deal with lowlifes like that, its not anything for you to get stressed over.

    61. Re:My two cents... by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 1

      warrant = arrest warrant
      (or warrant in debt)

      I don't know how unstable this guy is, but he an go so far as to file either one against someone if he perceives that person as having done him wrong. That may sound extreme, but, again, this guy does sound unstable and I've seen situations escalate rapidly when on or both parties gets angry.

      I've seen people say, "He has to pay you," or "He has no grounds to not pay you," or "He can't do that." It seems a lot of people are basing their ideas on right or wrong, and they're forgetting that the boss can do quite a bit. It doesn't matter if he's right or wrong. What matters is how the boss perceives his own position and if he is unstable, there is a good chance he will really believe that the employee has done something wrong. He's already accusing him of what amounts to espionage. All he has to do is believe he is right, and he'll find a way to hold back a pay check as long as possible, even delaying his responses the labor board, or filing a warrant to sue the employee for what he thinks was stolen, or filing an arrest warrant if he believes he has proof actual items, money, or trade secrets were stolen.

      None of those things are right, but if he believes he is justified, he can do them, and cause so much trouble for the employee he could even get him fired from that new job by keeping him so tied up for the first few days of the new job that he can't even be there.

    62. Re:My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The funny part is, they moderated him off-topic rather than Flamebait/Troll. Ahhh, Slashdolt never fails to amuse.

    63. Re:My two cents... by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 1

      Why pay a lawyer when there are other ways to accomplish the same thing for free -- and just as likely to work? (Let's face it -- if the guy is unstable, he can stall a lawyer more than he can stall the labor board by just asking for continuances.)

    64. Re:My two cents... by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2, Informative
      You say that such a thing might lead to an industrial tribunal. In practice, however, how impartial are such tribunals?

      In the UK, generally very good. They are composed of three people, whose combined experience is usually extensive and includes legal proceedings, working on behalf of employers and working on behalf of employees.

      Tribunals are generally held to be no-nonsense, firm but fair deals. If you try to get damages because you did something stupid and got yourself fired, they'll usually throw it out. If your employer really was acting improperly, you'll generally get fair compensation. Even organisations like Citizens' Advice speak well of them.

      What is the cost barrier for representation?

      You can take representation if you want, but often it's not necessary. A simple statement of your grievance may suffice.

      What are the various social stigmas which may follow an employee before, during, and after the proceedings of such a tribunal?

      For the kind of case you'd take to a tribual, relatively few. For employers, however, having a tribunal (which is public) find against you is a pretty damning indictment, and if it gets a lot of press locally it's a good way to run out of good staff to hire real quick.

      OK, your turn: where does all this cynicism come from? We have a system, it works pretty well both in theory and more importantly in practice, and it's immune to some of the gross abuses that get mentioned here pretty frequently under employment-at-will. What's your problem with it?

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    65. Re:My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty good stuff there Tripmaster.

      However, that sort of activity that is described is known as workplace bullying. A simple search on Google will describe various techniques, workarounds, examples, etc. I highly recommend all employees read and heed if they feel a co-worker (not necessarily the boss) is being slightly off. Hint to your co-worker that you know all about it. Watch them get worried.

      I personally was involved in a bullying case. We had someone who essentially made it a crusade to make sure they made their point that they knew more than you, even when they didn't. Then they'd rib and lamblast subvertly as much as they could and spread FUD about how you weren't of any value. Eventually it was dragged before superiors and as a result this person is much much better now. Blew their chances of a big promotion, but hey, it was the correct and proper thing that had to be done. If they'd been promoted, the bullying would have increased significantly.

      In that sort of case, think of it that you're doing them a favour. If they have to be stopped, do it. I personally wasn't getting hit hard, but I knew if I let it continue it'd mean a rapid downhill for everyone else, so I had to stand up and make sure my point was made.

    66. Re:My two cents... by mdfst13 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "They wrote me off, denied my unemployment claim, and withheld the paycheck for the two weeks' vacation."

      Technically, they may have been legally in the right in your case. To take a vacation, you have to come back at the end. I.e. you were required to come in for the exit interview.

      This guy's situation is different. He's actively working. It is not legal to withhold a pay check for work actually done. It is legal to fire someone (and not pay them) for not complying with reasonable work demands (e.g. an exit interview).

      I'm sorry to hear that you had such a bad work experience. However, an exit interview is not an unreasonable request. Heck, I'd think of it as standard procedure.

    67. Re:My two cents... by Pxtl · · Score: 1

      This is one of many reasons why I think that false accusation is roughly equivalent to kidnapping, and should be charged and sentenced as such. Falsely accusing someone is a violent crime, when you consider the kind of methods the police are authorised to use in enforcing it.

    68. Re:My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, well, getting started on that next job is going to suck when you're sitting in jail for stealing office supplies. Of course after you're let out, the boss will be doing the accounting and it turns out that the ledger's off by a bit over $500, back into the court system you go.

      Um, no, I go back first to file suit against my former boss for what he did to me. The fasle accusation(s), the lawyers fees, punative damages, etc.

      What are you going to tell your next boss "sorry, man, I know I just started here but I need a few days off to defend myself in court?"

      Yup. Just what you'd tell them if you, say, got into a car accident and got sued by the other driver and needed time off.

    69. Re:My two cents... by SilverspurG · · Score: 1

      My cynicism about employers and their contracts comes from situations like this one where the abusive manager had HR in his pocket, was a long-time favorite of the established upper management above him, was a 15-year industry veteran and a regular attendee at some very prestigious world conferences in the industry and who was taking out his personal and professional frustrations on a hardworking employee with the work ethic of a Catholic and the patience of an elephant who was only a single year out of undergraduate school.

      As for my cynicism about governments: Our own government here in the US is not even close to being the Constitutional Republic that it purports to be. The federal government has long overstepped the boundaries of legitimate power as defined specifically in the 9th and 10th Amendments to our Constitution and, in doing so, has dictated much of the policy that strongly influences if not outright controls not only our interior state governments, but the policies and procedures of the governments in much of the world, including the UK. The UK government has never truly impressed me either in the obvious contradictions between its public policy and the way it's handled things like, oh, the Irish, the Church, the Jewish world migrants after WW-II (not to mention creating the Israeli problem, without bothering to ask the natives of that area, prior to WW-II in their own efforts to move the Jews out of the UK), and South Africa. Second only to the Portuguese in brutality, from what I understand.

      How're those police installed microphones doing over there? All safety and do-good propaganda aside, aren't they indicative of an overwhelming and self-absorbed government as well?

      I'm fed up with the authority pyramid scheme that pervades the entire world, I'm fed up with the taxation pyramid scheme which creates more social problems than it solves, I'm fed up with the financial pyrmamid scheme so elaborately set up by the banking, insurance, and investment industry...

      And mostly, I'm fed up with the policy of lip-service which is used to pacify the population. And I'm fed up with a population that tolerates this kind of treatment from the very people they elected, from the very people whose paychecks they pay with their own blood, sweat, and tears 60-80 hours/week. I, and most of my fellow Americans, work more days/year to pay taxes than to pay myself... and what do we get for it? We get an overbearing government wasting our money to pass legislation allowing them to fiat more money just so they can funnel it back into their own private coffers by means of government contract, government regulation, and other back-alley poker type tactics: "If you can't win, change the rules so you can."

      There are 100 people in the world. There are 5 intelligent people, 5 greedy people, and 90 not-so-bright people. 2 greedy people convince 20 not-so-bright people to harass and otherwise detain 5 intelligent people. 2 greedy people convince 55 not-so-bright people to vote. 5 intelligent people get harassed to death while 5 greedy people use the votes of 55 not-so-bright people to justify turning the world into a planet of indentured servants.

      If authority were even close to solving more problems than it fixes, I'd be all for supporting authority. The way the world runs today, however, it's all a big pile of steaming poop.

      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
    70. Re:My two cents... by travellerjohn · · Score: 1

      ..good idea to send letters/emails of appreciation to your co-workers and the clients of your company

      6 months down the road and everyone will have forgotten your bosses eccentricity and all that will be left on the file is your letter. So best it is positive and represents you at your best.

      So smile, act profesional, and remember that you are the one who is moving off to a better future.

      Only a comple of weeks left, right!

    71. Re:My two cents... by SilverspurG · · Score: 1
      To take a vacation, you have to come back at the end. I.e. you were required to come in for the exit interview.
      Ah, no. I've watched plenty of people use their vacation to fill out their time when they were switching jobs. It's not a requirement. It was company enforced and government backed strongarm tactics to have a last chance to harass me after I walked out. I was on a first name basis with the HR rep who called me that day, mostly because I'd already talked with her on numerous occasions about my problems with my manager. The problem was that this HR rep was in my manager's pocket.

      The first HR rep who handled my case against the manager found in favor of me and told management to back off. He had actually been recruited by management to send me out the door but, with a few important details provided by me which management had carefully omitted, he recognized the kind of harassment that I was receiving. The company offered him a cozy position at a facility in another state, closer to his family. The management then waited three months, rehashed the same old story, and fed it to the new HR rep who was a young girl, easily pushed around and misled, with no sense of what goes on in big company politics.
      However, an exit interview is not an unreasonable request. Heck, I'd think of it as standard procedure.
      Say again how standard procedure justifies something which is illegal? Standard procedure does not require a victim to go through an exit interview with their assailant.
      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
    72. Re:My two cents... by trogdor8667 · · Score: 1

      If you're in a right to hire/right to fire state, leave.

    73. Re:My two cents... by LordNightwalker · · Score: 1

      In Belgium it's longer even: you start with a temp contract which lasts for 3 months, after which you are let go or your contract is converted to a permanent contract. If you decide to go whilst under a temp contract, you're required to give one weeks notice, and under a permanent contract it's 6 weeks. On the other hand, the company is required to give you the same amount of notice when they decide to sack you, so it works both ways.

      Maybe the law requires less than that, but I'd doubt it. Every contract I've seen so far uses the same notice periods. One would think if the law only requires 2 weeks, the company would be nuts to put itself in a position where they would have to keep you around for longer and pay you more when they decide to let you go. Especially since most of us are pretty replaceable to begin with, and replacements are readily available on the job market.

      --
      Install windows on my workstation? You crazy? Got any idea how much I paid for the damn thing?
    74. Re:My two cents... by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      Whatever he thinks, it's not OK to withhold the check for work performed. If he's slandering an employee and ultimately follows through on the threat to withhold pay, lawyer up and contact the company's legal department, and see how fast they capitulate.

      Yes. Law on this varies from state to state, but at least in California there's a government agency that takes an incredibly dim view of people not paying wages.

      But given that your boss is a bit paranoid already, I would make no threats about getting the check. My preferred technique for dealing with agitated, unstable people is to be pleasant but firm. E.g., "Bob, I offed to stay on a little longer so I could help FooCorp through the transition. I know things like this are hard for you, but your tone (or comments about my last paycheck or whatever) makes it hard for me to keep a good attitude about this."

      If he actually tries to screw you after you've left, by all means sic the government or your lawyer on him. But for now, just stay fixed on being exactly as nice and reasonable as you would be if he weren't a freak.

    75. Re:My two cents... by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 1

      Um, no, I go back first to file suit against my former boss for what he did to me. The fasle accusation(s), the lawyers fees, punative damages, etc.

      Do you really think it'll be that easy? You can file a suit, he can hire a lawyer and he can just keep postponing at ever level (just like SCO and IBM). It'll take you years to get anywhere, and you're assuming you'll win. There's a good chance you won't. Even if you do, you might have to pay a retainer that could amount to more than you can afford.

      He may be morally wrong, but that doesn't mean he can't do it, and it doesn't mean you have the means to get back at him. The chances are more likely that he'll exhaust your, and your lawyer's, patience and resources before you nail him -- and if you finally do nail him, the price per hour (or day or year) that you finally get for all the time you've put in will, except in a rare case, amount to almost nothing. Say you spend 3-5 years pursuing this. You might, after all is said and done, get a ruling that gives you $20,000. Great, you say, but you have no idea what you'll have to go through in that time -- the number of ups and downs, reversals, court appearances, and other problems you'll face.

      The problem with black and white thinking like that is that the world is not only in shades of grey, but in a rainbow of color.

      Yup. Just what you'd tell them if you, say, got into a car accident and got sued by the other driver and needed time off.

      I wish I could be a fly on the wall to watch this. Are you really so niave that you think 1) The boss will believe your story?, 2) That he won't suddenly re-think hiring you? 3) That, as an employer he will see your side instead of the old bosses?

      If you, as a new employee, miss a day (or part of a day), and tell them it is because you were in jail, do you really think you'll be there in a month? By the time you finish explaining, your new boss will think you're blaming your old boss for your problems. It won't be a "us against the old boss" thing. A manager is almost certainly going to take the side of another manager against an employee instead of siding with an employee against his former manager. There's also the adage that what an employee did in his old job is what he's likely to do for you, so if you tell him, you're starting your new job with a huge cloud of doubt over your head.

      But, on the other hand, why take it to that point? Why make someone angry at you so you've got one more person out to get you? Is that something you want?

    76. Re:My two cents... by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 1

      I've seen this system vary from company to company. In some it is clearly stated that vacation time cannot be used once one has given notice or during time of final notice. I know of one situation with a friend where she could not user her time and did not get paid for it. I don't remember the details, but she was aware of it before leaving, so it must have been in the terms of her contract.

      As for the exit interview, it was your chance to tell them why you were fed up and have it entered in permanent documents (you could have even typed up your comments and submitted them as part of your response). It may have even been one of the terms of your employment that you had to give an exit interview.

      I, too, am sorry you had a bad experience, but it also sounds like you did not look closely at the terms of employment. Is that possible? And why didn't you call the labor board (whatever name it goes by in your state) and ask them for help? Often just a simple question will result in a call that scares them enough that they'd rather pay you than face possible fines.

    77. Re:My two cents... by ramblin+billy · · Score: 1


      I'd take it a step farther. Take a note from the corporate world - document, document, document. Although you may be right that most of the people around are aware of the relative merits of your positions, a few years down the road something of a more permanent and clear cut nature may avert one of those unforeseeable disasters. It helps that your new job is in a different field, but that also means that once you're gone, his is the only voice people will hear. When someone asks: "hey, where's old Bob - he seemed like a good guy?" and he begins: "yeah, I thought that way too - until we started to suspect he was selling us out to Microsoft - yeah I hated to do it but I had to let old Bob go." He was your boss and if that's the only story around - well who would you believe? If the guy is as personally bereft of judgment and as hostile as you believe, you know he's going to trash you every chance he gets.

      When a big company wants to get rid of someone they follow a specific pathway. It starts with a heads up informally, proceeds through counseling sessions, and finally results in "we tried everything, but you just don't seem to trying to improve Bob, we wish it could be some other way, but we all have to live with our policies, 3 written interventions is automatic termination". The 3 interventions could be for 3 five minutes late episodes - it won't matter - they've covered their ass. Cover yours. Don't forget that sometimes burning bridges will keep you out of the whole neighborhood, not just one building. Try to find documentation for your side of the argument. If you can get copies of your employment record, do so, especially reviews and any commendations or letters of appreciation. Try to get a copy of your resignation with a signature and date of acceptance. If your co-workers agree you might get them to verify your description of actual occurrences. For instance you could e-mail them and ask them to verify that YOU are not misunderstanding the situation.

      Just remember - a perspective employer might understand that your boss was a psycho and still find your responses to be out of line. 5 years from now it will be a lot easier to answer the question: "Did you give notice and then walk out early?" with a simple "no" rather than an example of why you were right. As you have found with your present boss, the business world recognizes no obligation to be fair. Don't give anyone any reason to accuse YOU of unprofessional behavior. Don't worry too much about the check, most states are very proactive when it comes to employers withholding wages. In at least two states if the employer does not pay by the normal payday, the amount automatically gets multiplied two or three times. You know you're moving on to a better situation, bite the bullet and find honor in handling the situation as well as you are able. Making the best of a bad situation is an essential business skill, take this example to demonstrate your ability.

      billy - then, 2 months later, beat the snot out of him in a honkytonk pisser

    78. Re:My two cents... by SphericalCrusher · · Score: 1

      I was going to make a comment, but this one blew me away. This makes a lot of sense... and plus, on the withholding check issue, if you don't know, that's totally illegal. I would just get the hell out of there man.

      --
      "Instant gratification takes too long." - Carrie Fisher
    79. Re:My two cents... by ramblin+billy · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Personally, I'd have loved to give them that interview - and I would have been the most helpful, respectful, level headed example of a model employee those HR people had ever seen. I would have explained with great reluctance that my valuable contribution to their company was ceasing as a last resort, that I had been driven to it, and that it probably wouldn't be long till they were sitting down with the next victim. Most HR people live in a fantasy world, fed BS by both management and employees, occasionally they get it right. You might have got paid AND planted the seed that eventually spelled doom for the manager. Well, OK, you'd have got paid.

      billy - hey - it could happen

    80. Re:My two cents... by SilverspurG · · Score: 1
      As for the exit interview, it was your chance to tell them why you were fed up and have it entered in permanent documents
      They had permanent documents. They had six months worth of permanent documents about it and two requests, in years before the incident blew up, to be transferred away from the manager in question. There was even a written request to HR, within the first year of my employment of,"How to handle a situation where goals and expectations are set at an unreasonable level to include demands which are beyond the control of an entry-level employee?" That request was ignored for the most part. I was told that such a thing must be handled on a case by case basis should it ever arise. When it did arise, the department head looked me blank in the face and said he saw nothing unreasonable about the goals and expectations. Requiring an entry level employee to personally deliver a clinical target molecule. Nice.
      you could have even typed up your comments and submitted them as part of your response
      They were in my letter of resignation which I left with HR on my way out the door. It was a professionally written letter which said only that which needed to be said. All parties, including the HR rep who called me a week later, were personally involved with the entire history of the situation. She knew darned well what had gone on. The HR rep who had handled the situation before her had told her what was going on--but he was across the nation and she was doing exactly what management told her to do.
      And why didn't you call the labor board (whatever name it goes by in your state) and ask them for help?
      "We're sorry sir. The company has denied your request. Since you voluntarily left your job there's nothing we can do. The matter of your vacation time has always been a case by case subject. You may need a private attorney to look at your employee agreement."

      There was nothing in the employee agreement about a mandatory exit interview, only that the company may ask for one. I agree it was standard procedure, but the treatment which I received there was most definitely in violation of every concept of standard procedure when working with another human being. On numerous occasions I had told my manager that I'd had enough, that he was going too far, that, as a manager who was 3 promotions above me (which was atypical. most managers are only one level above their direct reports or associates), he needed to meet me halfway on at least some of the issues. He folded his arms, looked at me blankly, and said,"I don't need to meet you anywhere."

      I'm happily employed again and I like my current employer. I'm still paying to clean up the financial mess that was created at the last job. You don't just walk away from a professional job and expect the bills to pay themselves. I had tried for a year before leaving to interview with other companies, but I was out of sorts, harassed, and antagonized and wasn't in any frame of mind to interview well.

      As I said... it was like leaving a bad marriage in the middle of the night with no clothes, no money, no place to live, and nothing but a tiny suitcase under the arm. I'm doing better now that I've left but that's not to say what happened then isn't still causing problems for me now.
      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
    81. Re:My two cents... by SilverspurG · · Score: 1
      I'd have loved to give them that interview - and I would have been the most helpful, respectful, level headed example of a model employee those HR people had ever seen
      There's a reason why workplace harassment is technically illegal (though rarely proveable). It creates a situation that takes months, sometimes years, to return to a frame of mind where you can be helpful, respectful, and level-headed.

      I agree. That approach would have been the best way to handle the situation but, at the time and after dealing with that manager, the department head above him, and the new mgmt pet HR rep, I couldn't have pulled myself together to order a polite cup of coffee much less endure an antagonistic exit interview.

      Does it say anything that, when the HR rep called me at home, she offered that the company would not only give me my vacation pay, but a full month's salary if I'd come in for the exit interview? I replied,"You've been handling this case for six months. You know exactly what's gone on. You simply cannot treat someone like that."
      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
    82. Re:My two cents... by ramblin+billy · · Score: 1


      You know it sounds like she might have been looking for a way to do some good. I doubt if she had the push to authorize a months pay. It could be that news of your resignation reached levels beyond those informed of the earlier events. The fact that you were so pissed that you refused cash would tend to eliminate quite a few potential motivations when considering the cause of your behavior. Then again, there may have been forms routinely included in the interview they wished you to sign. Either they were covering their ass or trying to wipe some of the shit off. The fact that they offered more money at all suggests that you had - and may still have - a stronger hand than you thought. Like mobs, people in companies will do things they would never consider on their own, never realizing just how far off the beaten path they've wandered. They may still be willing to make that interview worth your while - besides with the perspective you now enjoy - it could be fun.

      billy - 6 weeks pay hmmmmm

    83. Re:My two cents... by SilverspurG · · Score: 1

      It was two years ago and 1000 miles away. If I could make a lifelong killing off of pursuing it, then I'd happily scorch 'em all and spend the rest of my life tending a garden, washing my car, jogging/cycling, working with LFS, and learning trade skills like pottery and woodworking. Anything less than a ridiculous windfall and, well, I guess I'm not doing so bad now. I'm still employed as a research chemist and, while I lost 8 months of pay before I could get my head together, I'm back to the same pay scale that I had just before I left.

      I was really hoping to increase my paycheck more but, all things considered, I'm not doing so bad for having taken a department head, a senior group leader, and an HR rep to task at their own game before the age of 30.

      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
    84. Re:My two cents... by Thu+Anon+Coward · · Score: 1

      you don't quite understand the point. that's ok, nobody else here seems to either.

      if you are fired w/o cause, you can claim unemployment. guess who gets dinged for the unemployment claim? that's right, the last employer. they pay a certain amount to the state workforce commission for future unemployment claims like this. if a claim is held to be valid, then their unemployment tax percentage actually goes UP. why do you think that most employers say you were fired for cause? because they know it's gonna cost them more in the long run.

      this is why it is so hard to fight the system in most states unless you have solid evidence of malfeasance/harassment/stupidity on the part of the employer.

      --



      I'm good with numbers - .45, 7.62, 9.....
    85. Re:My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hear, Hear! That is so correct. Once you devalue yourself just for your job, there's no end with what other parts of your life you will devalue. Just leave the job and move on.

    86. Re:My two cents... by rgmoore · · Score: 1
      Unless that final paycheque is big, BIG bucks - walk out the door and don't come back.

      Before doing that, it would probably be wise to double check to see if the boss even has the power to withhold the pay. I know that at my workplace the boss isn't directly involved in writing paychecks, so he would need to jump through some hoops to get the check withheld. If the OP's employer works the same way, a quick trip to HR could nullify the boss's threats quite easily.

      --

      There's no point in questioning authority if you aren't going to listen to the answers.

    87. Re:My two cents... by Adam9 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hmm.. new phrase?

      In the State of Texas, you get SHOT for withholding paychecks!

    88. Re:My two cents... by mdfst13 · · Score: 1

      "Ah, no. I've watched plenty of people use their vacation to fill out their time when they were switching jobs. It's not a requirement."

      I've done it actually (without an exit interview). You are mixing things though. The company does not have to require you to come in for an exit interview. They can waive that requirement if they want. The point is that they *can* require you to come back after a vacation to get paid for the vacation. They don't have to make you come back (heck, they can give you a bonus for nothing if they want), but they can.

      "Say again how standard procedure justifies something which is illegal?"

      What's illegal again? It is legal to require you to come to work to get paid for working. Period. You did not come to work. Therefore, you did not get paid. If they had withheld pay for time when you did come to work, then you would have had recourse. You do not have recourse for not getting paid for not going to work.

      They only time that you would have been able to insist on vacation pay *after* leaving the job would have been if it was explicitly in your employment contract. Since most people don't think about that when getting a job, it usually isn't there.

      Maybe the law should require that you get all vacation pay after quitting, but it generally doesn't. Part of the reason is that the point of vacation pay is to get you to take vacations so that you are rested and working better. If you didn't take the vacation during normal work, then they weren't getting the benefit from it.

      Frankly, it's possible that they didn't have to offer you the opportunity to come in for the exit interview and collect the vacation pay. You walked out on them. Depending on the exact law and policy, you might have lost all your benefits at that moment.

      "Standard procedure does not require a victim to go through an exit interview with their assailant."

      Standard procedure does require victims to go through exit interviews with their assailants; it's called a trial. Victims are required to attend them. If the victim skips out, then the trial is thrown out and the defendant wins. Defendants have the right to face their accusers. Really though, that's irrelevant here.

      If they actually did something that rose to the level of assailing you, forget this wimpy employment law/money stuff. You should have filed criminal charges against them.

      Again, it's quite possible that they were doing something that should have been criminal but wasn't. That has nothing to do with the current subject, which is the question of whether or not an employer can be compelled to issue a paycheck for time worked.

    89. Re:My two cents... by SilverspurG · · Score: 1
      The point is that they *can* require you to come back after a vacation to get paid for the vacation
      I think you're baiting the argument. In many states, when and how you take your vacation is something that the law reserves to you as the employee.
      What's illegal again? It is legal to require you to come to work to get paid for working
      The harassment was definitely illegal but I'm not the kind of guy who can afford the attorney, nor would I really want to, nor would I ask anyone else to jeopardize their jobs just to testify on my behalf. Withholding pay for not working is fine. Withholding pay for legitimately earned vacation is at best a technicality but still ethically wrong.
      Maybe the law should require that you get all vacation pay after quitting
      If you were truly paying attention, rather than trolling for the sake of argument, you'd notice that the order is exactly the opposite: I was taking my vacation and then quitting.
      Standard procedure does require victims to go through exit interviews with their assailants; it's called a trial
      You're destroying the metaphor to bait the argument (I'm seeing a pattern here). But, to continue, I don't remember that it's ever possible for the assailant to cross-examine the victim in a trial. I doubt quite highly that the company would've given me the honor of a proxy attorney at the exit interview.
      which is the question of whether or not an employer can be compelled to issue a paycheck for time worked.
      If not, I certainly hope they start withholding yours for being an argument baiter.
      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
    90. Re:My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, an exit interview is not an unreasonable request. Heck, I'd think of it as standard procedure.

      I call it being asked to consult for free. If they want an exit interview I ask "How much am I being paid for this? I don't consult for free."

    91. Re:My two cents... by dodobh · · Score: 1

      Remember to use a laser pointer.

      Oh, and I always point with my finger, so the other three fingers are merely getting out of the way.

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    92. Re:My two cents... by jcr · · Score: 1

      You might have got paid AND planted the seed that eventually spelled doom for the manager.

      My sister is a VP and assistant general counsel for a fortune-500 property management firm. She practices employment law, as part of her job, and she tells me that it's not at all unheard of for a manager to get fired over issues that a company first hears about in an employee's exit interview.

      So, if you have a beef with your manager that's prompting you to resign, then by all means, let the company know why you're leaving.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    93. Re:My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      all the above depends on your specific contract. It seems unlikely you could leave without notice without having a financial penalty heck the company would likely have to give you more than a weeks notice after 6-7 years. Depending on your contract and geographics of course.

    94. Re:My two cents... by u2pa · · Score: 0

      The requested exit interview seems to me like a perfect oppertunity, for you to let HR know whats been going on.

      The manager might not lose his job over it, but he would surely look worse when it came time for promotions.

      --
      Officially: "No comments"
    95. Re:My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After reading your responses I am starting to understand where the problem lies. I think it is with you. You make claims about illegal behavior when it wasn't illegal. Just because you don't get your own way doesn't make something illegal. I think you just want sympathy and when you don't get it, you get defensive.

      Hopefully, you are happy in your new job and will someday be able to get over this.

    96. Re:My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drama Queen.

    97. Re:My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about tell ing to F**k Off!!

      like the rest of the replies on here, they are right he need you more than you need him.

      If he threatens to with hold pay either go to citzern adive or put in a small claim court application to get teh money.

      You got any holiday left? If so instead of working out the notice period and hope that he pays you the hoiday money left owing to you, put in a holiday like two weeks and therefore only work 2 out of the 4 weeks notice.

      Just think you got another job so who the f**k cares what he thinks and bu law he can not give you a crap reference either. If fact kept details of a colleague and/or client for future references just incase.

      Good luck!

    98. Re:My two cents... by Tassach · · Score: 1

      At least in Maryland, you are legally entitled to be paid for accumulated vacation time (but not sick leave) when you leave. It's part of the pay you've already earned.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    99. Re:My two cents... by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

      Once you give notice, they are not required to let you stay on for the duration of your notice, they don't even have to let you stay on any longer than is necessary to clean out your desk and escort you out the door.

      If you give notice, and expect to take 2 weeks of vacation during that notice, they can simply terminate you now rather than in 2 weeks. Hence you don't get paid for that vacation unless they elect to let you.

      I think it was pretty reasonable of them to offer to give you that time as vacation at all, especially for so little a thing as doing an exit interview. You might even have been able to swing that on the phone, but even if not, it's not unreasonable for them to want information from you as to why you're leaving the company, etc. Even if they should have known it, the "Current employee grievances" file is a different one from the "Grievances that caused employees to quit" file, and the latter will be taken much MUCH more seriously. People like to whine about their jobs (I do it, and I think I have a good job), but when they take specific action based on those complaints, it sends a much stronger message.

      By refusing the exit interview, you lost an excellent opportunity to help prevent your boss from being able to abuse someone else.

    100. Re:My two cents... by Kopretinka · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Really, is the stress and bullshit worth the money? If it's gonna be a month or so, put your expenses on a credit card for a month (keep 'em reasonable), and just pay it off when you get the new job.
      Ugh, I'm off-topic, but is it just me or should living at least one month without pay be covered by a buffer of savings from the 6 or 7 years he said he had a not-so-bad job? I know people who don't have such guffer and I franky have no idea what they are doing or in fact how they are doing it.
      --
      Yesterday was the time to do it right. Are we having a REVOLUTION yet?
    101. Re:My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And make sure to use LOTS of bold face type in your letter so that any emphasis you were trying to add is completely lost...

    102. Re:My two cents... by indifferent+children · · Score: 1
      One typo could cause him to say that we were "worthless," "useless," "unprofessional," "shit," and many other such fine terms.

      The best harangue that I ever heard was from a Colonel who was put in charge of a mixed facility (military and civilians) for the first time: "Every civilian in this building is an oxygen thief!"

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    103. Re:My two cents... by Kopretinka · · Score: 1
      s/guffer/buffer/ s/franky/frankly/

      And the preview and submit buttons should be switched, this is not the first time I wanted to preview but submitted instead - I think previewing should be encouraged and thus get the more prominent button position.

      --
      Yesterday was the time to do it right. Are we having a REVOLUTION yet?
    104. Re:My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you were truly paying attention, rather than trolling for the sake of argument, you'd notice that the order is exactly the opposite: I was taking my vacation and then quitting.
      This isn't what you said previously. To have taken your vacation and then quit, you would've had to take the vacation, then come back to the office and say "I'm quitting now." You quit effective after your vacation, then went on vacation.

    105. Re:My two cents... by Major+Lame+Brain · · Score: 1

      Furthermore, in most states in the U.S. you *can* sue for his threat to withhold pay. That's right -- you can sue for the threat -- not just the act. I agree w/Trip, though, the bridge has already been burned by your boss. Get some real legal council. Do you have a job description? Does it say you are responsible for hiring your replacement? Was anyone else present to witness this idiot's threats and slander? Document what you can by writing a log with dates. That will go a long way in court should you need to go that route, even if the data you put in the log is uncorroborated.

      --
      I report to Colonel 2.6.1 and General Chaos is his boss.
    106. Re:My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perfect response, Mod up.
      But it raises the point that managers must be made accountable for loosing 'irreplacable' staff with subject matter experience (SME).

    107. Re:My two cents... by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      So where's all this hoidy-toidy legal rights junk now? I'm still paying for the mess that was created by a manager harassing an employee near to death.

      It's your own fault I'm afraid my friend. You should have left in the normal maner, read a little employment law, or seen a lawyer first. By giving them a big "fuck you", you left yourself open.

      You can't just "walk out the door" and expect them to be honorable. You weren't. Your prior mistreatment is not relevant; two wrongs do not make a right. Notice periods work both ways; in redundancy you get it to find a new job, in resignation they use it to find a replacement.

      You didn't deserve the paycheck, nor did you deserve unemployment. Think how both of those systems would be abused if your behaviour was acceptiable and common. Unemployment is for those who find themselves out of work through no choice of their own. You can't just quit a job and expect to get it. Otherwise, half of McDonalds retail would quit tomorrow.

      Next time, line up a replacement job, or plot to bring the company/manager down that annoyed you in the first place. :-)

    108. Re:My two cents... by mdmarkus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wait a minute. I think i just witnessed two people disagreeing reasonably and at the same time, bringing some light to the subject. That's not the slashdot i've come to know and loathe...

    109. Re:My two cents... by mixy1plik · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what state the submitter is in, but here in MA it's state law that you are paid for the time you work. I quit my last job on very bad terms (walked out one day, FedExed my laptop back on Monday) and I had to get my last paycheck by way of the State Attorney General's office. You are ENTITLED to the paycheck for time you work IN ADDITION to unused vacation time.

    110. Re:My two cents... by tag · · Score: 1

      Yes, in Texas, "he needed killin'" is a valid legal defense.

    111. Re:My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't blink.

    112. Re:My two cents... by k96822 · · Score: 1

      I walked off a job once too. They sent me a paycheck as well. There are legal restrictions on them holding your pay, no matter how much they might want to.

    113. Re:My two cents... by telecsan · · Score: 1

      To that end, the preview button could be placed on TOP of the submit button. Surely that would increase the percentage of previewed posts.

    114. Re:My two cents... by ajnsue · · Score: 1

      I agree, The marketplace for talent is a bit different now days. Employers accept that the economy for the past few years has made a spotless employment history much less likely. On a similar note... I worked for a manager with paranoia and "issues" with honesty. Now, its been a few years and I can be somewhat more understanding. But, for a while I was in fear that every potential employer was going to call up this idiot and ask his opinion of me. But, NOBODY goes to the trouble of looking up a reference unless you provide it to them. If they request contact info for this particular person. Be honest - you will provide the reference of peers at that job - but not that person. If they persist give them the details.

    115. Re:My two cents... by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      In spite of what you've seen in movies, Texas has fairly strict gun laws.

      In agreement with what you've seen in movies, Texas is apt to exercise the death penalty.

      Shooting someone in Texas, for almost any reason, is a worse idea in Texas than it is in most places.

      -Peter

    116. Re:My two cents... by bluGill · · Score: 1

      If they say you were fired for cause they better for paperwork to back up what the cause is, otherwise they will loose far more in the lawsuit than unemployment costs. The risk of this is often so great that they will pay the unemployment just to be sure you don't sue. At least in my state unemployment is a maximum of about $10,000 per year, though this varies. A lawsuit can cost that much if they win, and much more if they loose.

      I'm not aware of any employers saying things were for cause, unless there is a cause. Lawyers advise against it. I know of many (seasonal) employers who let people go all the time, and their employees get unemployment. (Until next season when they come back)

    117. Re:My two cents... by portscan · · Score: 1

      letter of recommendation? why bother? he already has a new job and this will just add fuel to the fire.

      that last paycheck should definitely not be in question. i am not sure what channels you could go through to rightfully claim what is yours, but the courts come to mind (and certainly the threat of using the courts...)

    118. Re:My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think this is bad, try living somewhere else... like, oh, say, rural Mexico, or perhaps India. You'd be selling your last shoe and risking your own life to try to get into the U.S. to even have a shot at what we have here.

      Travel to a couple third-world countries and you'll see that life here isn't so bad.

    119. Re:My two cents... by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1
      My cynicism about employers and their contracts comes from situations like this one where the abusive manager had HR in his pocket, was a long-time favorite of the established upper management above him, was a 15-year industry veteran and a regular attendee at some very prestigious world conferences in the industry and who was taking out his personal and professional frustrations on a hardworking employee with the work ethic of a Catholic and the patience of an elephant who was only a single year out of undergraduate school.

      And yet, in the post you linked to, you wrote this:

      When I left my last employer I gave no notice and informed my manager that I was taking my two weeks of vacation as I walked out the door.

      and this:

      Call a lawyer? I'd been so harassed and was so out of sorts at the time that no lawyer even wanted to talk to me. Truthfully, I wouldn't have wanted to talk to me at that time either.

      which rather suggests that the damage in that case may have been mostly self-inflicted. You didn't mention whether there was any stipulation in your contract about either taking an exit interview or payment in lieu of holiday not taken, so it's hard to tell.

      I'm also trying to work out the timeline; you suggested in the parent post that you'd only been out of school for a year, yet said in your other post that you'd been in that job three years. Was it not a full-time job? What was all the abusive behaviour you've claimed but not described anyway?

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    120. Re:My two cents... by SilverspurG · · Score: 1

      I see you've saved "drag queen" for yourself.

      No, you can't be Burger King. My roommate from college was Burger King.

      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
    121. Re:My two cents... by saltydogdesign · · Score: 1

      Well, he doesn't have a job anymore anyway, so now he's nobody's problem but his own.

      It's funny though -- your reaction based on my stories describes him to a T.

      --
      // This is not a sig.
    122. Re:My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "They wrote me off, denied my unemployment claim, and withheld the paycheck for the two weeks' vacation."

      Technically, they may have been legally in the right in your case. To take a vacation, you have to come back at the end. I.e. you were required to come in for the exit interview.


      IANAL, etc.

      Most states in the U.S. have laws that treat any earned vacation (as long as the employer has a policy on awarding so many vacation hours for so much time worked) as the property of the employee; it must be paid out when the employee leaves as a benefit.

      If an employer refuses, immediately contact the Attorney General's office.

      And that's my advice for this question: the threat to withhold a paycheck is not legal in any state I know of. Contact the Attorney General's office and find out what the law is, explain the situation, and ask for their help.

    123. Re:My two cents... by Thu+Anon+Coward · · Score: 1

      you are correct to a certain extent but let me explain it a bit clearer, if I may.

      UE benefits in Texas run no longer than 6 months and a max of @ $330/wk and you must prove that you are looking for work. If after 6/8 wks you still have no offers, you are required to lower your minimum acceptable salary 25% as compared to your prior salary. If you are offered a job within this range and do not accept, you just lost UE money.

      when you file for unemployment (UE), at least in Texas, your prior employer is notified of your potential claim and asked about the circumstances. many of them will claim you quit. if you decide not to fight it because many times it is just not worth the hassle of trying to prove the malfeasance, they have saved themselves a ton of money. remember, there is a presumption on the part of state law that you quit your job unless you can prove otherwise.

      unless you can prove that they discriminated against you, and you immediately disagreed, you are SOL. example - your company moves 20-30 miles further away from your house. at first, you think it won't be that big a deal. however, after 2-3 months, it is a problem, so you quit. you no longer qualify for UE because....you accepted the new working conditions implicitly by going to the new location. if you had quit right away, you would have gotten UE. think this is impossible? check out the state of Texas website Appeals Policy and Precedence Manual (in PDF) at www.twc.state.tx.us. they've got some wild ones in there.

      --



      I'm good with numbers - .45, 7.62, 9.....
  2. Hello Mcfly, Suck it up! by lecithin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Is it worth sticking out the few weeks I already told him I worked or should I just cut my losses and leave early?"

    Easy. You don't have any losses. You have a job waiting for you.

    Stick with it until you said you would. ALWAYS keep to your word especially when leaving an employer. If they want you gone now, they will walk you out of the building.

    It is your bosses problem, not yours. This sounds like a me vs you thing. If it is so bad, talk to your HR. The odds are that if everybody knows your boss is nuts, they do to. If they don't know, they want to know.

    Do you believe that you are responsible for finding your replacement? I don't understand how they could keep your paycheck if YOU don't find a replacement.

    If your boss thinks that he cannot replace you, put some bait in front of him. Ask if they can match an offer or do something to change your work environment. Even if you have no interest in staying, it buys time and allows you to leave with a smile on your face when YOU say no.

    Back to the original though. DO NOT QUIT EARLY! You gave your word and it is a small world. It would suck to have this bite you in the ass. In a few weeks it will be over and you will laugh at it.

    Oh yea...

    You insensitive clod! You have a JOB! You have an OFFER and a JOB! You have a 'soon to be X Boss' that you can &uck with? Quit bitching! :)

    Get over it! Screw with the Boss and have fun. You are leaving, he has no control over you. You have an offer, you don't need his reference. Get prepared for your new career and forget the past.

    I am curious what the "different industry" is. Did you take up Hindu? :)

    --
    It could be worse, it could be Monday.
    1. Re:Hello Mcfly, Suck it up! by nolife · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If your boss thinks that he cannot replace you, put some bait in front of him. Ask if they can match an offer or do something to change your work environment.

      That is a slippery slope. In fact there are many articles and stories floating around jobs sites/newspapers about trying the counter offer route. Here is the short version as I understand it:
      Asking for a raise and throwing down a competing offer are two different things all together. If you like where you are but think you deserve more money, you ask for a raise or better conditions, you are asking based on a chance that better things may come.
      If you think the conditions will not change, you just do not like where you are, where you are going, or what you are doing then you look somewhere else. More money will not change any of those factors and normally only acts as a short term fix if the real reason you do not like there stays the same.
      The "bad blood" and attitude from each side after a counter offer is not comforting either. The authors bosss reaction already shows some of that.

      Each boss and worker relationship is different but the general guidelines are that it does not normally work out well in the long run. I'm sure there are many exceptions as well.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    2. Re:Hello Mcfly, Suck it up! by Beatlebum · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I disagree. Working out 2 weeks notice is a courtesy, not a requirement. Why should this guy stick around to be abused by his boss in front of colleagues? If I was him I would clear out my desk late in the evening and call HR early the next morning telling them I had decided to leave early because of my boss's hostility.

      When someone is behaving irrationally the best thing to do is get out. His boss is already talking crap about the guy, so what's the difference? If everyone regards him as a nut then why would they listen to his stories?

    3. Re:Hello Mcfly, Suck it up! by glass_window · · Score: 1

      Hey, the point of a two-weeks notice is to leave 'on good terms' and if that soon-to-be-ex-boss apparently ruined those chances by not showing the proper courtesy, why should you hold up your end? You don't have anything to lose, leave and get it over with.

      On the other hand though, with how strict the legalities are behind job referals are now, as long as you give your ex-HR head as your contact chances are that they won't do more than confirm that you worked there in said position for said amount of time and left with proper two weeks notice, end of story. Quite a few companies have managed to get into trouble for dishing out anything more negative than that.

    4. Re:Hello Mcfly, Suck it up! by sevebal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The craziest situation I have ever been in was when I was laid off from a small company due to horrible financial mis-management. I filed for unemployment (which ends up raising the employers premium) and next thing the guy was offering me a short-term contract to train my replacement which he hadn't started looking for yet. When I told him to screw off he contacted the unemployment people and told them I had refused a job offer which in turn, stopped my checks. I got a lawyer and went to a hearing which I won. He then rewords the contract to get rid of one of the reasons it was invalid, sends it to me, I refuse and again contacts the employment commission which stops my check. Another hearing, and another victory for me. Soon after I had an offer.

    5. Re:Hello Mcfly, Suck it up! by composer777 · · Score: 1

      I disagree, he should end the relationship with his boss immediately. His boss acted in bad faith by threatening to withhold the final paycheck, and the relationship has now become abusive. If a future employer asks, he can say,"In good faith I attempted to give them a month's notice. Then my boss began to become verbally abusive, and threatened to illegally withhold my paycheck. This breach of ethics on his part caused the relationship to be terminated immediately." You have no obligation to continue to stay in an abusive relationship with people who are acting in an abusive and unethical manner. Telling your new employer that unethical behavior will result in the termination of the working relationship tells them that you have character and won't put up with bs. It's just like if you are a cop who finds out that half the force is dealing in illegal drugs, or you are a CEO, and find out your company has been fudging it's accounting records. Your loyalty to your company goes out the window when ethics are violated. That should go without saying.

      Giving several weeks notice before leaving is given with the implied condition that your boss and everyone at the company will continue to behave in a reasonable (i.e. sane and non-abusive), courteous, and ethical manner. It's not an unconditional guarantee that you will put up with several weeks of misery at your own expense. If these conditions really needed to be spelled out explicitly, then every offer of good will on an employee's part would need to be backed up with 10 pages of legalese. So, no, he has no obligation to stay, that obligation was voided when his boss became abusive.

    6. Re:Hello Mcfly, Suck it up! by kni52 · · Score: 1

      This is a great way to explain the situatiuon to a future employer. More people should take the ethics of situations into consideration like this.

      That being said, a friend of mine who is a recent college graduate was told by a career consultant that she should not go into a career in corporate America because her level of ethics was too high. Go figure.

      --
      My subtext is just a figment of your imagination.
    7. Re:Hello Mcfly, Suck it up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ignore this idiot. If you live in a place where it is "employment at will" and you haven't signed a legally binding contract otherwise, quit immediately.

      When asked about why you left there, tell the truth: to take a new position.

      He _already_ showed he'll badmouth you, there is no reason to stay and lots of reasons to leave. It will not help you in the least to stay. Anyway, you'd quit if you were treated like shit like he is doing now, right?

      Well, of course if you LIKE being treated like shit, stick around!

  3. Advice by DarkHelmet · · Score: 4, Informative
    Obviously, threatening to withhold your final paycheck for something like this is against the law. Report him to the labor board if he does actually withhold it.

    Otherwise, just be polite, but firm. If he burns bridges, it's his choice. You did your best.

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    1. Re:Advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Threatening to withold it is illegal, regardless of whether or not he actually does it.

    2. Re:Advice by aeproberts · · Score: 1

      It is ILLEGAL for him to withold pay without any due cause. Leaving a job is obviously not a good enough reason. If he wantsto withold pay then he is not allowed to let you continue to work there. By allowing you (or you being nice enough) to still show up he is obligating himself to pay you. Stick to your word - Don't leave early because it could damage your reputation down the line. Unless things start to become unbearable or dangerous I would take the high ground, finish up strong and leave when you said you would.

    3. Re:Advice by Courageous · · Score: 1

      Obviously, threatening to withhold your final paycheck for something like this is against the law.

      The word you are looking for is "extortion." If this had been me, he and the company both would be hearing from my attorney. This person has made an inexecusable error and is a hazard to the other people working at the company. A firm spanking is definitely in order.

      C//

    4. Re:Advice by toxic666 · · Score: 1

      Labor boards vary from state to state. Some are effective, some are not. The IRS, however, is a good option to level against your boss. Do not put off telling him you will report the company for failing to give you your last paycheck.

      Trust me, it works; I have relatives who work there and they clued me in. I once quit a job and the boss withheld my last paycheck for 6 weeks. I then told him he would be reported to the IRS if I did not have may check within three days. He drove it up and persoanlly delivered it with an apology that night.

    5. Re:Advice by ebuck · · Score: 2, Informative

      The best reply to a threat of "Holding your paycheck", is this phrase. Remember it well:

      (Laugh in a good natured way and then say) "That's fine, I would love to own this company in settlement."

      It's a rediculous statement, but one that indicates that you do know your rights and won't fold. But even more importantly, it lets him know that his threat failed to deliver the one item that it was really intended to delever: It failed to inspire fear.

      Been there before, and I know it sucks. But don't say anything even remotely bad about your boss. Even if everyone agrees with you and praises your insight, you're still out of there in a week or so. Let him dig his own grave. Any boss that bad mouths thier employees won't be looked on kindly by his peers. He won't get fired for it, but you can gurantee that he will be passed over for promotion until people forget his behavior.

    6. Re:Advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ignore this sheep.

      I've been there and I can't believe all the sheep who state to stay longer and work hard for him and baaaaaa....

      You are leaving already. You gave fair notice, more than the legal requirement if you live in the US. Abuse isn't in your job description.

      If it happens again, tell him, your abuse isn't appreciated, I quit as of now. I fully expect my last check, if you withhold it as you threatened I'll get it from you with the government's help.

      Then have a nice relaxing time. Or prep for your new job. If the check doesn't come, immediately call the appropriate people (labor board?) and ask for their assistance.

    7. Re:Advice by OverflowingBitBucket · · Score: 1

      Ignore this sheep.

      I've been there and I can't believe all the sheep who state to stay longer and work hard for him and baaaaaa....

      Perhaps you should skim through my post again. At no point do I suggest working hard for him. I don't even remotely suggest this. My response is a suggestion on how to get through things so that it doesn't bite you in the ass in the future, whilst setting youself up to crush the asshole boss on your terms afterwards if you feel that you should. You must know some pretty fearsome sheep. ;)

      Anyway, an interesting rant, may I suggest you attach it to a comment more suited to it in the future.

    8. Re:Advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Legal requirement? Unless you are under some sort of contract, there is absolutely none. The wonder of at-will employment. It works both ways. Typically, its used by corporations to screw you over with the "you fired, security will escort you out". However, you can just as easily say, "I quit. Have a lovely day". Two weeks is a common, industry-standard courtesy, and by no means a legal requirement. On the other hand, you really do burn big bridges if you leave with less than two weeks notice.

  4. lolz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wtf

  5. Dupe??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it just me, or have we seen this "Ask Slashdot" before???

  6. Use the legal solution.. by Ckwop · · Score: 1

    My advice, Hold out for the remaining weeks of your notice then if he with-holds your final pay-check file a law suit for breach of contract to get the money he owes you.

    Simon

    1. Re:Use the legal solution.. by eric76 · · Score: 1

      If he with-holds your final pay check, file a complaint with your state's labor commission. There shouldn't be any need to get a lawyer involved.

    2. Re:Use the legal solution.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great, get lawers involved... that always makes everything MUCH better

    3. Re:Use the legal solution.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, in this situation, it really could make things better for him. I suspect that if you document the harrassment (including the libel/slander he has apparently been committing) and bring it to the attention of your company's legal department, your boss will immediately be read the riot act and told to STFU.

      If your current company doesn't have a legal department, they probably aren't well set up to defend themselves against a lawsuit. Remember, if you win (and it sounds like you probably would, but IANAL) you can recover not only damages but also penalties and legal costs.

      Again, IANAL. But documenting everything would be a good idea at this point, if you are not already doing it.

    4. Re:Use the legal solution.. by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1


      Actually, I find it does (of course, my sister is an attorney).

      Just getting a sternly worded letter on letterhead from an attorney's office is usually sufficient to induce people to straighten up and fly right.

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

  7. Try finding a replacement by Espectr0 · · Score: 0

    If you can't, try explaining your boss. If he still doesn't like it, and if you don't mind much that paycheck (how much) then you at least gave your best effort.

    1. Re:Try finding a replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you go so far as to give a blow job for something that is already yours ?

    2. Re:Try finding a replacement by OrangeSpyderMan · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm afraid I think this is bad advice. As previously mentioned, it's not his problem to fill his position when he leaves, and grovelling because you can't find someone will just serve to prove him right. By all means he should offer to help interviewing candidates if he's still around, but his boss probably won't want him to, as its a little too much like admitting he's not as bad as the boss appears to be trying to make out he is. At the end of the day - as many other posters have said, the professional way is to hold up your end of the deal - work the notice, and work it as well as you've worked the rest of the time, but don't lie down and drop your pants the minute the "crazy" boss decides he wants more than you and employment law think is reasonable.

      --
      Try NetBSD... safe,straightforward,useful.
    3. Re:Try finding a replacement by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 3, Insightful



      Um...no. Respectfully, I must disagree.

      It is not the writer's responsibility to find a replacement. That resposibility lies squarely with the manager.

      If the manager still doesn't like it, tough. He's contractually obligated to pay that final paycheck.

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

  8. easy by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 2, Funny

    If it were me, I'd give him a good 'ol fashioned swift kick in the nuts. Then say thanks for the job insecurity, expoitation, long hours, minimal pay raise, and general harrasement.

    Then I'd give him another good kick in the ribs to grow on.

    --
    The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
    1. Re:easy by venicebeach · · Score: 1

      I guess thats why they call you grumpygrodyguy.

    2. Re:easy by flyingsquid · · Score: 1
      If it were me, I'd give him a good 'ol fashioned swift kick in the nuts. Then say thanks for the job insecurity, expoitation, long hours, minimal pay raise, and general harrasement. Then I'd give him another good kick in the ribs to grow on.

      There's a fine line to walk. Don't make a habit of being a doormat, or people will get in the habit of walking all over you like one. At the same time, being able to get deal with assholes and deal with unfair treatment is a valuable business skill.

      I've found that hitting back at the people who make your life difficult gives you a short-term sense of satisfaction and release of frustration, but in the end being able to walk away and say, "despite this guy being a total asshole, I kept my cool and did the right thing" is far more valuable and satisfying in the long run. If someone tries to bully you, just keep your cool and stand your ground.

    3. Re:easy by auggie2001 · · Score: 1

      EA in Loveton?

  9. Two words by unassimilatible · · Score: 1

    "White Oleander."

    --
    Slashdot "libertarians": Small government for me, big government for those I disagree with. -1, I disagree with you
    1. Re:Two words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two words:

      Huh?

    2. Re:Two words by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      Apparently the idea is to torture the boss with a bad movie?

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
  10. Solicitor's advice , not slashdot's! by norfolkboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This sounds legally dubious.

    You need the advice of a solictor. Especially if he is withholding pay, and damaging your reputation.

    1. Re:Solicitor's advice , not slashdot's! by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Solicitor? How quaint and folksy...

    2. Re:Solicitor's advice , not slashdot's! by julesh · · Score: 1

      It is the correct term in Britain for a lawyer who is not a barrister. I'm not sure if there's an equivalent term in the US?

    3. Re:Solicitor's advice , not slashdot's! by saforrest · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if there's an equivalent term in the US?

      No, there's no specialized term in common use. One would just say "lawyer" in this instance

    4. Re:Solicitor's advice , not slashdot's! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second that. I wouldn't believe that U.S. doesn't have any regulations about starting and leaving job as well as mutual obligations of both employer and employee.

      Are there any government agencies for job-related conflicts, like in Socialist Europe?

    5. Re:Solicitor's advice , not slashdot's! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We use the term "ambulence chaser" to indicate anyone in the legal profession.

    6. Re:Solicitor's advice , not slashdot's! by illumin8 · · Score: 2, Funny

      You need the advice of a solictor. Especially if he is withholding pay, and damaging your reputation.

      Is Solicitor what you UK chaps call a Lawyer? If so, I just found a whole new use for my No Soliciting sign!

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    7. Re:Solicitor's advice , not slashdot's! by pilsner.urquell · · Score: 1

      You need the advice of a solictor(sic). Especially if he is withholding pay, and damaging your reputation.
      The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (http://www.eeoc.gov/) keeps a list of employment lawyers in your local area.

    8. Re:Solicitor's advice , not slashdot's! by nomadic · · Score: 1

      We use the term "ambulence chaser" to indicate anyone in the legal profession.

      No, we don't. It's a pejorative applied to a small subset of lawyers, those doing personal injury work. Is a district attorney an ambulance chaser? A judge? A law professor? A public defender? A tax lawyer?

    9. Re:Solicitor's advice , not slashdot's! by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Nah, unlike most European legal systems we only have one general-purpose lawyer who handles everything. The US tends to overtrain its professionals, which is why lawyers are expected to have a working knowledge of every major branch of law, and why medical students do rotations in specialties they have no intention of ever working in.

    10. Re:Solicitor's advice , not slashdot's! by mdfst13 · · Score: 1

      "Are there any government agencies for job-related conflicts, like in Socialist Europe?"

      In the US, there is a federal labor board and usually a state labor board. It would almost certainly be the state agency that would have jurisdiction in this case.

      I see this as less of a question about legal options. Those can be determined by calling the state labor department. The question here is how the person should handle interaction with the boss. The goal being *not* to go to court.

      Even if there weren't regulations, the US is a common law country. There is a great deal of contract law precedent.

  11. Stick it out by superdifficult · · Score: 1
    While it's hard to say seeing as I don't know the exact details of your situation, I've always believed you should stick things out.

    Perhaps you can go out and get your boss drunk one night and just get it all out on the table. I'm sure he's just overreacting because he's upset.

    1. Re:Stick it out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah - so there's this guy who's, uh, NUTS, and you know he's not very fond of you, and in the interests of IMPROVING the situation you want to get him blotto and then say, "so what pisses you off about me?"

      Uh - yeah. Good plan.

  12. We all understand... by MoonFacedAssassin · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The main question you have to ask yourself is "Do I need this job experience on my resume?" If you are compelled to answer yes, then your best bet is to leave as cordially as possible, but explain to any other interviewer, if necessary, that you left to pursue an advancement of your career and your supervisor resented it. I say "if necessary" because there's no point conveying that if the interviewer doesn't contact them for reference. Granted, it's tough to find out whether or not they will be contacting them.

    Most sane and mature employers understand that as long as you give them notice of the termination of employment that the burden of employee replacement is on the employer, not you. The fact that your current employer is doing this proves how immature he is. Withholding the last paycheck may be something stipulated in documents you signed at the beginning of employment so you may want to look those over.

    I have had previous employers that I have had issues with personally, but tried my best not to burn the bridge myself. If they had burned the bridge, I would definitely talk to their boss about this. If they didn't have a boss above them then I would gladly have had choice words for them. It's all a judgement call, but if you need this on your resume, definitely don't burn the bridge yourself.

    --
    I am a meat popsicle.
    1. Re:We all understand... by graphicartist82 · · Score: 1

      If you are compelled to answer yes, then your best bet is to leave as cordially as possible, but explain to any other interviewer, if necessary, that you left to pursue an advancement of your career and your supervisor resented it.

      If he's just putting down that he worked at this place for a certain period of time in his 'job history' section of his resume, his new employer cannot call and ask them for a reference. Any HR person will know that. All his current employer can do is verify that yes, he did work there for that period of time -- that's it.

      Now, if he put his boss down as a reference, (which, as it seems, would be a stupid idea) then his boss could put his (albeit crazy) $0.02US in. So, even if he does end up having to quit before his notice is up, he'll be perfectly find and come out smelling like a rose.

    2. Re:We all understand... by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1
      The worst part of this situation is that your boss is going to bad-mouth you to anyone that calls for a reference in the future. There is nothing you can do about this - he will do it, and he will also blame every bad thing that happens on you for six months to a year after you are gone. If possible, try to use a different name on your resume and any application, such as an HR person, your boss's boss, or anything else that makes sense within the organization.

      I was in a similar situation with a previous job, and discovered that my former boss was totally ripping on me when she was called about a reference. Luckily, she was only my boss for about 6 months, so I used my previous boss's name (and his existing contact information) after that, and never had another problem.

      And he CANNOT withhold your paycheck. He will open himself up not only to a lawsuit from you (that you will win), but also to fines and sanctions from the DOL or your local labor board (if any).

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    3. Re:We all understand... by bluGill · · Score: 1

      In the US you can talk to his former employers. Anyone sane will, if only to make sure the resume isn't completely fabricated.

      However most HR department (and all sane ones!) have a policy that they will only say "Yes he worked here from date to date and left in good standing". The only exception is if they fired you, and have proof that would stand up in court that you are not a good employee. Saying anything more is asking to be taken to court for not giving a factual reference. (they might win the case, but they have to pay lawyers to do it)

    4. Re:We all understand... by rootofevil · · Score: 1

      bullshit. if your boss says nasty things about you which are not true, you can sue him for defamation and all sorts of other nasty discriminatory things - ESPECIALLY if it causes you to not be hired.

      one of the other posts has it best - leave as cordially as possible and let future interviewers know that this manager was upset that you left.

      --
      turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
    5. Re:We all understand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One trick to try is to hire a private investigator and have them phone in for a phoney reference. Have them tape the what is said by the boss and then consider consulting an attorney.

    6. Re:We all understand... by Courageous · · Score: 1

      The worst part of this situation is that your boss is going to bad-mouth you to anyone that calls for a reference in the future. There is nothing you can do about this

      Oh yes you can. Just get several people to call, each different, faking a reference request. The defamation law suit is a slam dunk, total no brainer, he's DOA.

      C//

    7. Re:We all understand... by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1
      if your boss says nasty things about you which are not true, you can sue him for defamation and all sorts of other nasty discriminatory things - ESPECIALLY if it causes you to not be hired.

      ... If you have the money to hire an attorney, do the legwork, and get everyone involved to admit what happened! Usually, you don't even why you were turned down for a job, even if you press the hiring company. How many times have you gotten a rejection letter that says "so-and-so told us that you were a lazy shit, and so we have selected another candidate..." ??!?

      The only reason I found out about this was because a friend at the old company was in the boss's office when she got the phone call. I couldn't get ANY information from the company that decided not to hire me, so I still HAD NO CASE!!

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    8. Re:We all understand... by dubl-u · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you are compelled to answer yes, then your best bet is to leave as cordially as possible, but explain to any other interviewer, if necessary, that you left to pursue an advancement of your career and your supervisor resented it.

      That's a good way to put it. And it brings up another reason to keep your cool during the final weeks: getting a reference from a coworker instead of your boss. When I check references, I'm nearly as glad to take a reference from a peer of the manager as the manager herself.

    9. Re:We all understand... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Hmm

      If I was interviewing anyone who said "supervisor resentment" he would be filtered out right away and sent to the door.

      This is why blacklisting former coworkers are illegal. Its nearly impossible to get rehired again.

      I think this guy should document everything and go to HR. That way he can be fired and HR could do a recommendation. They wont say employeeX was fired or was disloyal during his interview.

      Whatever you do DO NOT MENTION TO THE INTERVIEWER WHAT HAPPENED.

  13. That depends... by mikael · · Score: 1

    ... does your new job depend on references from your existing employer? I wouldn't want to make the situation any worse that it is already.

    If nothing else, you might end up meeting your current workmates in another company some time in the distant future.

    Otherwise, get out of there as fast as you can, since you have already indicated that you were unhappy working there.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  14. Get a lawyer by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 2

    And have the lawyer write a simple letter explaining that you'll be paid through the end of your employment regardless of finding a replacement. Remember, too, to take the high road, don't stoop to this guy's level. It'll make him look all the more like the ass that he is.

    1. Re:Get a lawyer by (H)elix1 · · Score: 2

      And have the lawyer write a simple letter explaining that you'll be paid through the end of your employment regardless of finding a replacement.

      I'd use the lawyer only after he held up my check. Make the assumption he won't do something so stupid now, keep docs, and *if* he does something so dumb then pull out the hired guns.

  15. Leave Now by tyleroar · · Score: 0

    Leave now and threaten to sue him if he doesn't pay you. He can't not pay you if you don't find a replacement. Since you have already found another job, it doesn't much matter if you leave on good or bad terms.

    --
    Portland, North Dakota Puppies
  16. cut your losses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he's trying to find something to blame on you, don't wait until he does.

    before you leave document everything, you do.

    then sue his ass off: from witholding pay to defamation of character...

  17. Don't publically call your boss 'nuts' by tonsofpcs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    DO NOT write anything like the following in a slashdot article: My boss has always been a bit nuts.

    1. Re:Don't publically call your boss 'nuts' by Fyz · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, I did submit as an anonymous reader...

      Whoops.

    2. Re:Don't publically call your boss 'nuts' by tonsofpcs · · Score: 0

      And when you talk about the advice you received from slashdot, no one will notice that it is you?

    3. Re:Don't publically call your boss 'nuts' by fredrikj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why would he?

    4. Re:Don't publically call your boss 'nuts' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well... my best employee has deserted,
      the whole business is disintegrating...
      sure I'm nuts... wouldn't you be ??

    5. Re:Don't publically call your boss 'nuts' by krunk4ever · · Score: 1

      How many bosses do you think out there read slashdot? How many of them do you think are nuts? How many of them do you think recently received a notice of leave from one of their employees and have been doing the aforementioned?

      I think a lot of bosses are going to be going crazy over this wondering if it was 'their' employee that posted this. so anyone out there that is in a similar situation as the poster, WATCH OUT!

    6. Re:Don't publically call your boss 'nuts' by HaloZero · · Score: 1

      Little touchy today, eh boss?

      --
      Informatus Technologicus
    7. Re:Don't publically call your boss 'nuts' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides, I proved that he had a duplicate key and finished off the strawberries!

    8. Re:Don't publically call your boss 'nuts' by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      not to worry. how many bosses do you know that actually read slashdot? That's what I thought.

    9. Re:Don't publically call your boss 'nuts' by El+Gordo+Motoneta · · Score: 1
      not to worry. how many bosses do you know that actually read slashdot?
      Hey, mine does. Some time ago i made a little post about some of my work and he started shooting e-mails like rockets, screaming for some credit for my work mates and for himself! It was a good laugh. =D
    10. Re:Don't publically call your boss 'nuts' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the rest of us have our nutty bosses call us in and ream us out for writing to slashdot on office time, we'll all know why.

      "You're so v-a-a-i-i-n-n, you probably think Slashdot is about y-o-o-u-u..."

    11. Re:Don't publically call your boss 'nuts' by cperciva · · Score: 1

      How many bosses do you think out there read slashdot? How many of them do you think are nuts?

      Irrelevant. The important question is how many bosses think that they are nuts.

      Odds are that even if the boss in question read this story, he wouldn't recognize it as referring to him.

  18. And now: My two cents... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 4, Insightful
    You know, strictly speaking, it is his responsibility to find a replacement for your position, not yours. You should remind him of this in no uncertain terms.

    There's no "stricly speaking" about it. You have no responsibility on this point.

    If everyone knows your current boss is a nut case, just try to live with it until you leave. If you can't stand it, just walk out. You already have a follow-on job, and you don't need this guy, if he's going to bad mouth you anyway, cut your loss and don't show up tomorrow.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    1. Re:And now: My two cents... by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 2, Informative


      There's no "stricly speaking" about it. You have no responsibility on this point.


      Yes...I know...I was actually being a bit facetious in my original post...thanks for the clarification.

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    2. Re:And now: My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      > If you can't stand it, just walk out.

      Fuck that.

      Next time he gives you some lip, you make your move. Prepare your revenge by eating nothing but Taco Bell, bran muffins, and cheap whiskey for the next three days. Then you wait until you're in the next board meeting and someone asks if there are any comments. Jump up on the table and say "Yeah! I got a comment!" Then you whip your cock out and smack him in the face with it. He'll freeze out of shock, and while he's standing there bugeyed 'cause he's just been cockslapped you whirl around and go all Tubgirl on him! With any luck he'll slip in the poo and fall down, and finding himself face down in a steaming puddle of whiskey-poo he'll most likely hurl like a 90-pound freshman cheerleader at her first frat kegger. The combined smell of poo and hurl should cause a chain reaction around the boadroom as the entire staff voids their stomachs and bowels in a cataclysmic emetic eruption of Biblical proportions. While everyone's flailing around in a growing lake of filth, you slip out the side window.

      As the coup de grace, you run to his house and tell his wife he's been busted for child pornography. She'll run screaming to her mother, which will leave you unfettered in his home. Get his daughter *and* the dog pregnant, burn down the house, and create a huge upside-down pentagram on his front lawn in weed killer.

      "Just walk out?"

      Feh.

      That's not the kind of talk that got us through Guadalcanal, you know?

    3. Re:And now: My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The parent post was childish, offensive, and disgusting.


      Mod parent UP, baby!!! Yeah!!!

    4. Re:And now: My two cents... by serutan · · Score: 4, Informative

      Seriously dude, your boss can feel any way he wants about you leaving, but telling you you have to find your own replacement crosses the line. You have to take him aside right away and tell him very directly and matter of factly that you aren't going to find him another employee, and he's not going to withhold any of your pay. Employee turnover is a normal part of doing business and he just has to deal with it. Staying 6 or 7 years at a job is way longer than average, and (I assume) you've done good work for him during those years. There's no reason you can't part on good terms, and no reason for him to make threats. Most people respond to straightforward statements of facts. Try to be friendly. It sounds like you genuinely want to be. But if he acts like a jerk and actually does try not to pay you, you have to be prepared to get a lawyer to write a demand letter. [If it came to that, I'd demand the pay plus the cost of the lawyer writing the letter, with a clear statement that the next step will be a lawsuit including punitive damages and legal costs.]

      Your boss isn't Mr. Krabs. This is the real world and he has to live in it. I'm sure that unless he's truly crazy he really doesn't want to deal with a lot of legal crap just because you hurt his feelings or whatever.

    5. Re:And now: My two cents... by youknowmewell · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sounds like you have some experience with this.

    6. Re:And now: My two cents... by 3vi1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Remind me to never piss you off.

    7. Re:And now: My two cents... by NanoGator · · Score: 0

      "Remind me to never piss you off."

      Heh. As if he could actually reach your face with his cock.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    8. Re:And now: My two cents... by Hortensia+Patel · · Score: 1

      Somebody's been reading far too much Transmetropolitan...

    9. Re:And now: My two cents... by neithian · · Score: 1

      Hahaha, funniest shit... ever.

    10. Re:And now: My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is probably the best slashdot post I've ever seen.

      -vvj

    11. Re:And now: My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously that strategy must of worked for you.

      Tell me -- which was better: the dog, or the daughter?

      My guess: you're just another loser tech dweeb whose palms are raw from jerking off to posters of "New Kids on the Block."

    12. Re:And now: My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be the love child of Howard Stern and Douglas Adams.

    13. Re:And now: My two cents... by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

      I was going to mod you down but I'm too scared

      (no I really wasn't... that was the funiest thing I've read in a while)

    14. Re:And now: My two cents... by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Since he's acting so irresponsibly, there's no reason to stay:
      1. Document it (use one of those mini-mp3 players with the built-in mic)
      2. Quit, and let him know why you're quiting, and that as far as yuo're concerned, his actions are harrassment and constructive dismissal
      3. Demand 5 weeks pay in lieu of severance (1 week per year). If you don't get it, sue
      And before everyone starts whining about how you can't record a conversation without the other persons' consent - YOU'RE NOT ON THE PHONE!
    15. Re:And now: My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was with you until you decided to take his dog.

    16. Re:And now: My two cents... by Given+M.+Sur · · Score: 2, Funny

      Excellent instructions on how not to burn a bridge. I'm sure the submiter will appreciate them.

      --
      nil
    17. Re:And now: My two cents... by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, much better would be to FIND him a replacement. Surely you know someone who's even a bigger pyscho asshole as your boss. Hire him.

      With a little luck, they will kill each other.

      Other choices:

      - Really Smelly Homeless Guy
      - Seriously, Seriously Flaming Gay Guy (best if boss is a homophobe)
      - One of those guys who is SUPER nice, but a TOTAL fuck-up (they are very hard to fire)

      Use your imagination.

    18. Re:And now: My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please let us know who posted this? I want to add you as a "friend".

    19. Re:And now: My two cents... by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 1, Informative

      Dammit... my best reaction in two years and I posted anonymously. I should have had the courage to stand behind my poo humor. ;)

    20. Re:And now: My two cents... by Cybersaint2k · · Score: 1

      That is +5 vorpal funny. I'm almost crying. And I can't repeat it to ANYONE I know.

    21. Re:And now: My two cents... by tomhudson · · Score: 3, Funny
      Once someone threatens to illegally withhold your pay, the time is LONG gone for worrying about burning bridges - they've been burned, the adjoinging fields have been plowed under, and the earth is beings salted.

      So you can either "bend over and take it like a man", or stand up for your rights.

    22. Re:And now: My two cents... by NormalVisual · · Score: 4, Informative

      Demand 5 weeks pay in lieu of severance (1 week per year). If you don't get it, sue

      If the original poster is in the U.S., that will probably get him/her nowhere unless severance pay is detailed somewhere in the contract, if there is one. Most states regard employment as an "at will" situation, and if a given entitlement isn't in the employment agreement, for all intents and purposes it doesn't exist.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    23. Re:And now: My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > create a huge upside-down pentagram on his front lawn in weed killer

      Hehe, good way to offend the witches ;-)

      [Wiccans use the pentacle, essentially an upside down pentagram with philosophically opposite meanings, as a symbol, though some also use the pentagram. The pentagram is also used by Satanists.]

    24. Re:And now: My two cents... by manx013 · · Score: 1

      I approve. I wish I had mod points.

    25. Re:And now: My two cents... by DarcSeed · · Score: 1

      Holy shit, I nearly died laughing, THAT was funny :)

      --
      Best death? What, die from a naked lady avalanche?
    26. Re:And now: My two cents... by cubicleman · · Score: 1

      Hilarious...sick and twisted. I'll admit, though, when I left a large corporate telecom job a few years ago, I disliked my boss so much that I had the urge to go have a big lunch at an Indian buffet then come back and have a firehose diahreea BM all over his cube... :) I left on good terms though.

    27. Re:And now: My two cents... by cnoocy · · Score: 5, Funny

      I knew that Wil Wheaton was a Slashdot reader. I must admit I'm surprised to see that Jason Mewes is. Welcome to Slashdot, Jay!

      --
      This sig is not the Zahir. Lucky for you.
    28. Re:And now: My two cents... by nick_davison · · Score: 4, Funny

      >>The combined smell of poo and hurl should cause a chain reaction around the boadroom as the entire staff voids their stomachs and bowels in a cataclysmic emetic eruption of Biblical proportions. While everyone's flailing around in a growing lake of filth, you slip out the side window.

      >Remind me to never piss you off.

      Nah. Just don't piss off Chunk from The Goonies. I knew it sounded familiar:

      But the worst thing I ever done -- I mixed a pot of fake puke at home and then I went to this movie theater, hid the puke in my jacket, climbed up to the balcony and then, t-t-then, I made a noise like this: hua-hua-hua-huaaaaaaa -- and then I dumped it over the side, all over the people in the audience. And then, this was horrible, all the people started getting sick and throwing up all over each other. I never felt so bad in my entire life.

      MP3 Version

    29. Re:And now: My two cents... by ThJ · · Score: 1

      I figured you could just take it for a walk in the park...

    30. Re:And now: My two cents... by Rorgg · · Score: 3, Interesting

      >

      Heh, I know one of these who needs a job. Guy came in as a consultant on a huge db conversion project we were insanely understaffed on, so as a highly paid contractor, they gave him a part of it and left him alone.

      Naturally his part got delayed and whatnot, and as it became clear toward the end of the main body of the project was nearing an end, he was hired on by management in a senior admin position, despite some vague warnings from those in the trenches.

      Once his part of it got finished, well behind the rest, all the rank-and-file admins realized he was a complete incompetent, who would just drone on and on based on bad premises to anyone who would listen. To anyone who didn't know better (read: management) he was a brilliant admin with biting analysis. To everyone with a clue, he was a clueless idiot doing pointless busiwork to hide it.

      Of course, management loved him, and he stayed with us for nearly THREE YEARS before finally there were enough documented cases of him destroying stuff for management to give in and restrict his rights -- whereupon he used what access he did still have to let himself back in under someone else's ID. At that point, caught red-handed, and finally confessing after denying it, he FINALLY got canned because there was simply no other option.

      So, yeah, hire him. Your boss deserves it.

    31. Re:And now: My two cents... by pablodiazgutierrez · · Score: 0

      Boy that sucks. You would think things should have advanced since the XIX century...

    32. Re:And now: My two cents... by mrselfdestrukt · · Score: 1

      Anyone NOT saluting this guy for the funniest post is a wanker! Oops.I almost typed salting.
      RESPECT!

      --
      "I used to have that really cool,funny sig ,but it got stolen."
    33. Re:And now: My two cents... by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      Find him the BOFH.

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    34. Re:And now: My two cents... by TheMCP · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In regard to cutting your losses and leaving... if you already have the new job lined up and the current job started mistreating you after you gave your notice, just call the new job and say "I know I told you I wanted to give two weeks notice at my old position, but it turns out that won't be necessary. Would you like me sooner?"

      If they're pros, they'll understand, really. And if they do say they'd like you to start immediately, just pack your personal belongings at your old office, then inform the old manager that since he's clearly "concerned" about having you around this will be your last day, and does he have any further questions before you depart? He'll be angry. He may tell you so. If he asks, it's okay to tell him honestly that you've felt mistreated since you gave your notice and have no desire to remain further to experience more of it. (After all, he asked.) He may be angry about that too, but that's not your problem.

      Then as long as he's reasonably sane, answer any questions he may have about your job (he may want passwords for stuff etc), and spend the rest of the day politely providing final information to aid their transition to your replacement.

      And if he yells at all, just say good bye, walk out of his office, go get your box of personal stuff, and leave. You have no further need of him and no obligation to stay if he's going to act hostile and threatening. Make sure to say good-bye to at least three people on your way out, including people who don't have your (now ex-)boss as their boss, so they can verify the time and date of your departure in case it becomes an issue regarding pay.

    35. Re:And now: My two cents... by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Honestly, unless the boss is the CEO, it's probably worth escalating this up the chain to your HR department. The boss in question clearly should not be employed, and if you play your cards right, you might end up getting the job... assuming you would even want it....

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    36. Re:And now: My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know who you are (obviously). But, that could very well be the best comment that I have ever read on /.. You made me laugh untill I cried-literally. My stomach hurts. Thank you!

    37. Re:And now: My two cents... by Nirvelli · · Score: 1

      And before everyone starts whining about how you can't record a conversation without the other persons' consent - YOU'RE NOT ON THE PHONE!

      In some states you don't have to tell them even if it is a phone call.

    38. Re:And now: My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>"Seriously, Seriously Flaming Gay Guy (best if boss is a homophobe)"

      Why exactly do you think hiring a gay guy would be revenge? You mention it would work best if the boss is a homophobe and that the gay guy should be "Seriously, Seriously Flaming" gay but what the heck does that mean? Flamboyant? Acts girlish?

      How might that be revenge exactly (since you allow for it still to be revenge even if the boss isn't a homophobe)? Isn't this suggestion more an indication of your own inadequate ability to tolerate people that are different than you? Being gay, even "Seriously, Seriously Flaming" gay, doesn't mean a person can't be a good employee.

      I'm sure I'll get attacked for pointing this out but really, you can't evade the obvious intolerance that goes into writing something like that. It's 2005 people, grow up.

    39. Re:And now: My two cents... by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      I can read quite well, and even better, I actually have reading comprehension skills - the original text says "in lieu of severance", which implies that he/she is already entitled to some kind of severance package and the 5 weeks' pay is being offered as a substitute. I suppose alternately one could interpret it as saying "gimme five weeks' pay and I won't quit", but that would be a stretch. "If you don't get it, sue" could be interpreted any number of ways, but absent a modifying phrase for "sue", one would reasonably assume it's in the context of the preceding sentence, thus implying the suit would concern the severance agreement.

      Where exactly in the post in question did the interpretation of "in lieu of going to court over slander" come from, and this time let's see if our intrepid AC can do it without an ad hom, hmm?

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    40. Re:And now: My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And before everyone starts whining about how you can't record a conversation without the other persons' consent - YOU'RE NOT ON THE PHONE!

      And?

    41. Re:And now: My two cents... by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's an anonymous post. How will you know who not to piss off?

      Hmm, I think life just got a little more dangerous...

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    42. Re:And now: My two cents... by mellonhead · · Score: 1

      That reminded me of the "Radioactive Beige" post from last year: http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=116003&cid= 9818444

    43. Re:And now: My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow that is something awful!

    44. Re:And now: My two cents... by 21st+Century+Peon · · Score: 1
      --
      "Knowledge, sir, should be free to all!"
      ~Harcourt Fenton Mudd
    45. Re:And now: My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It many states you still need consent even in a face to face conversation or in eavesdropping. In some states you need the consent to record from everyone involved in your conversation. It's not just phones, for most recording is of questionable legality without a signed consent form.

    46. Re:And now: My two cents... by pfharlock · · Score: 1

      ok, that was funny.

    47. Re:And now: My two cents... by HaydnH · · Score: 1

      - One of those guys who is SUPER nice, but a TOTAL fuck-up (they are very hard to fire)
      You've found your man... and I'm looking for work! Actually I'm not a complete F-up... I'm just lazy - perhaps it's due to being in a really wank job and it's motivational... or perhaps I just love /. so much that I never have time to work... nah I'm just lazy!

      Haydn.
      --
      Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so. - Douglas Adams
    48. Re:And now: My two cents... by JDizzy · · Score: 1

      ahem.....

      So you can either "bend over and take it like a [BITCH] man", or stand up for your rights[LIKE A MAN].

      Not sure where you come from, but bending over and taking it like a man seems kinda gay and bad advice.

      --
      It isn't a lie if you belive it.
    49. Re:And now: My two cents... by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      Ever been into a bank or a store? There's cameras all around, and no signed consent needed.

      What you THINK is the law, isn', its just common sage.

    50. Re:And now: My two cents... by slackerboy · · Score: 1

      Ever been into a bank or a store? There's cameras all around, and no signed consent needed.

      And most of those cameras don't have microphones. Recording of images is not illegal, but recording audio is (in most states, YMMV, etc.). This brings us back to your second point:

      What you THINK is the law, isn', its just common sage.

      --
      Things to do today: See list of things to do yesterday
    51. Re:And now: My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      In most states, it's completely legal to record conversations AS LONG AS you are one of the parties. If it's two third-party individuals having the conversation and you record it, then it's illegal.

    52. Re:And now: My two cents... by SCPRedMage · · Score: 1

      It ain't vorpal funny til your head pops off.

      --
      My sig can beat up your sig.
    53. Re:And now: My two cents... by jersey_emt · · Score: 1

      He's working for a 'small development company'; I doubt they have a HR department. There probably is only one person above his boss, if even that.

      --
      My spoon is too big.
    54. Re:And now: My two cents... by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Guess I should have included a link to the goatse,cx guy ... it was a JOKE, dude!

    55. Re:And now: My two cents... by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Informative
      You're allowed to record yurself - no consent needed (its' implied you consent to recording yourself).

      Check your cell phone - it can probably record. It can also pick up and broadcast background sounds - including the voices of other people. So are you going to claim that you need the consent of everyone in the room to talk on a cell phone?

      The law, in practice, is very easy - the guy is making an illegal threat (to withhold pay). Yo record it. You are NOT going to be busted for that.

    56. Re:And now: My two cents... by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You know what I'd do? Smile politely and be pleasant. If someone is trying to wind you up, there is no better way to counter it than to make them think it's getting nowhere. Be really nice. Laugh loudly when they are in earshot. Walk with a spring in your step.

      The worst that can happen is that your boss won't be able to take it and will explode. Just avoid situations where it is just the two of you alone; always have witnesses. Work off the notice, be thankful it's over and move on with your life.

      After all, it's just a job. Companies nowadays layoff employees to improve profitiablity, unlike days of old when it was a last resort. They don't give you any consessions, so why return the non-favour?

    57. Re:And now: My two cents... by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      About the best DBA I ever met is an EXTREME flamer. He doesn't wear dresses or anything, but he wears tiny, tight shorts in public and does the whole mincing thing. He does it on purpose, to piss off homophobes. It's a hoot.

      So hire someone who is perfect for the position, but who the boss can't stand personally (make sure the new hire is in a "protected group"). If the boss turns around and fires him, the boss can be sued for discrimination.

    58. Re:And now: My two cents... by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      Normally, when you give notice, you agree to work for x number of weeks while they find a replacement and train him/her. However, since the employer has made the work situation intolerable (constructive dismissal), he is entitled to being paid without having to show up.

      The idea is to use the recording as leverage to obtain what is rightfully his. The proper way to go about it is to say, I want 5 weeks compensation for what's been going on here. Then, when he's told to go fly a kite, play back the recording, and say "Guess I have no choice but to go the legal route. Just thought I'd give you a look at what you can expect to find during discovery, as a courtesy. BTW, I'll be asking for all your records during discovery. Don't erase or shred anything by accident"

      5 weeks would be cheap compared to the costs involved at that point (we can learn SOMETHING from the SCO/SCUmbags)

    59. Re:And now: My two cents... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Better yet tell HR and document all these things.

      Let them know you left because of this asshole boss.

      It sounds perhaps him and not you should be looking for a job.

    60. Re:And now: My two cents... by DA_MAN_DA_MYTH · · Score: 1

      You know people read slashdot when you reply in a board meeting with: 'Yeah! I got a comment!' and everyone runs out of the room.

      Best Post Ever.

      --
      "It takes many nails to build a crib, but one screw to fill it."
    61. Re:And now: My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, you're wrong.

      All one has to do in a private place is post a notice at the entrance - and it doesn't have to be large. Just a small sign or decal at the entrance.

      In a public location, there is NO expectation of privacy so don't think you can't have your conversations recorded. You are not protected by law.

      You would be surprised at how many stores, banks, etc. DO record audio. More often than not, the microphones are plainly visible (You might mistake them for CO detectors or alarm buzzers, etc.) and others are sometimes hidden. Usually the store managers tinker with them and crank the gain way up on the preamp, completely overloading the audio inputs on the DVR or VTR(VCR), making the recordings useless thanks to distortion, but that's neither here nor there.

      (I work in the surveillance industry)

    62. Re:And now: My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find your lifestyle offensive. This does not mean I need to grow up. Quite the contrary. I think it is you that needs to grow up. Boys go through a stage where they hate girls and are more comfortable with other boys. MOST boys reach puberty and start chasing the ladies. You appear to have not made it to puberty, let alone adult hood.

      Everyone knows that the original poster meant a gay guy would be torture for a homophobic boss; and, thanks to the whacked out laws which discriminate against white, male, Christian, heterosexuals of European descent, a non-homophobic boss would be stuck with a guy he couldn't possibly fire. But, you had to make a mountain out of a mole hill and change the subject.

      I would not have said anything, but, you chose to criticize my beliefs.

    63. Re:And now: My two cents... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say most; there are also alot of states that requires BOTH parties to concent, not just one of the parties.

  19. T's win... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get outta there, it's gonna blow!

  20. He may be in violation of the law by davidwr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have no good advice for your general situation, other than this:

    1) offer to go quietly immediately, and offer to stay for a reasonable period of time - 2 weeks after your initial notice is reasonable - and let him make the choice.
    2) if he lets you go today, don't expect to get paid for time not worked.

    If he actually withholds your final paycheck, take it up with human resources, his supervisor, or if necessary, someone higher up. What he is doing is most likely illegal. If necessary, remind him of his legal obligations and that the next step will be the court system, civil AND if applicable, criminal court. Don't threaten legal action unless all else fails, that will burn all bridges.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:He may be in violation of the law by Brooklynoid · · Score: 2

      1) offer to go quietly immediately, and offer to stay for a reasonable period of time - 2 weeks after your initial notice is reasonable - and let him make the choice.
      2) if he lets you go today, don't expect to get paid for time not worked


      No. State when your last day of employment will be (typically 2-4 weeks from date of notice) and stick to it. If they ask you to leave prior to that date and don't pay you through that date, then they're terminating you, and you're entitled to collect unemployment insurance (if there's a long enough lag before your new job starts), and to collect any perks (severance package, etc.) normally provided by your company upon termination.

    2. Re:He may be in violation of the law by jchevali · · Score: 1

      This would be my advise:

      * If you need his reference and can't get a fair one in writing now, quit a.s.a.p. Otherwise the relationship would only get worse, and his reference in the future would only be more unfair.

      * If you think there's a chance he won't pay you, tell him that you're not showing up tomorrow unless he starts to pay you IN ADVANCE (and any arrears cleared). In any case, do not stay any longer than the notice period you intended to serve.

      * If indeed, after all, he doesn't pay you, I would advise you not to sue though, because that will be very expensive in comparison, and will only make the lawyers richer (if you like lawyers, do sue :-)

  21. Difficult to leave on perfect terms, always by xtal · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's the same as breaking up with a signifigant other - when it comes right down to the marbles, you're leaving because there's something you don't like, and by collary, you think that you can find something better. In this case, you already have something better. The person on the other side of the equation is going to have a tough time with that.

    It's worse if you're leaving a business on shakey ground - because it's the ultimate vote of non-confidence. I think it's worse in tech, because a lot of the time, the people ARE the company.

    Don't worry about what your boss thinks. Do what you said you would, always, but at the end of the day the decision has already been made. Concentrate on making a good impression with your new employers.

    --
    ..don't panic
  22. Stay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and fulfill your end of the commitment

  23. Be direct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd agree with the other posters so far and say, yeah, stick it out.

    I guess I don't know your boss at _ALL_, but, if it gets too bad, at some point, you're just going to have to be direct with him. I'd imagine it'd go something like "You're treating me poorly and making both of us look bad, you already know I'm going to leave, so we should make this as pleasant and professional as possible. I intend to honor my promise to stay for N weeks, but if you want me to leave sooner, I will." Being direct in a positive way shouldn't burn any bridges. Of course, like you said, if he's crazy, you may already be hosed.

    Good luck in your new career!

    1. Re:Be direct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, and _DON'T_ mention lawyers or suing or dogs-with-bees-in-their-mouths until _after_ he withholds the check. He probably is just bluffing to try to get more "equal footing;" there's no sense spending any goodwill capital on his stupid little game until you have to.

  24. Withholding pay by Leebert · · Score: 1

    even threatening to withhold my final paycheck if I don't find a replacement before I leave.

    Withholding pay without just cause is often illegal. I'd consult with legal counsel, or at minimum your state's department of labor.

    1. Re:Withholding pay by taustin · · Score: 1

      It's always illegal in the United States. It's generally criminal.

      Don't even bother talkign to the asshole. If he does steal from you, file a complaint with your Labor Relations Board. If you can't take the risk of lost pay, get out immediately, and file that complaint as soon as you're out the door. Threatening to withhold a paycheck is illegal, and generally criminal, as well.

    2. Re:Withholding pay by Apotsy · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Exactly. You wouldn't believe how many stories along these lines I've heard from people. The victims are usually young, naive, and working retail. In nearly every case, the person does nothing because they don't know their rights. They just bitch about it to their friends.

      In most cases, merely threatening to call the labor board will scare an employer into complying with the law. If it doesn't, then proceed with the actual call to the labor board, and for good measure call an employment attorney as well. And don't whine that you can't afford one -- you can always find one who will consult with you for FREE. Just call the local bar association for a referral. (And no, a free consultation does not mean the lawyer is shady/crappy; it's a standard part of their services.)

      It's a LOT harder for employers to screw you over when you know your rights AND take steps to see that they are enforced.

    3. Re:Withholding pay by Horrortaxi · · Score: 1

      In California if you are not paid on time the penalty is a day's pay for every day they're late--including weekends and holidays. So if your check is due Friday and you don't get it until Tuesday you've just made 4 days extra salary. Cha ching! Of course to get this you have to file a complaint with labor standards/enforcement, but you will get it.

      It's not okay for your boss to threaten to not pay you. Does he have a boss? Do you have a human resources department? Either one will lay the smackdown on your boss if you tell them about this. Or...have you heard of Jack's Smirking Revenge? Maybe you can get a paid vacation out of this.

    4. Re:Withholding pay by ebuck · · Score: 1

      The company has a lot more to lose than you do by withholding pay. Even the mention that you will (don't say might) fight the loss of this paycheck is enough to make any manager stop. Even your frustrating manager knows that the business will not back a person that goes out of their way to create legal issues. Instead, the corporation will (wisely) protect itself by indicating that the former manager acted outside of his authority and was fired / reprimanded / demoted / etc.

    5. Re:Withholding pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, if the boss has threatened to withhold pay, he has commited a crime. At this point, the boss is in over his head and the poster needs to consult an attorney.

  25. There's no reason to be friendly about it. by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

    Given that he's already threatened to steal money from you, tell him that he either needs to pay you ahead of time, or you're walking out the door.

    That's my opinion of the ethical situation. If you don't think that'd work, or you don't actually want to walk out the door, you should:

    TALK TO A LAWYER. Seriously. They will tell you what you can do if he actually stiffs you. No, no one thinks you should actually work for free.

    --

    There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  26. Uh-oh! by AntiPasto · · Score: 1

    Oh how could you disrespect the family like this? Well...

  27. you want to fuck your boss apparently by painkillr · · Score: 1

    your question is about leaving on good terms but the real problem is the way your boss is treating you. you're like one of those rape victims that thinks you asked for it somehow.

  28. I think he needs it on the resume... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1
    The main question you have to ask yourself is "Do I need this job experience on my resume?"

    He said he'd been there 6 or 7 YEARS. I think he needs it on the resume.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    1. Re:I think he needs it on the resume... by zbuffered · · Score: 1

      In Colorado, if you put that 6 or 7 years of job experience on your resume, but do not use your crazy boss as a reference (which sounds like it's going to happen anyway), you've got nothing to worry about. Past employers cannot legally give any information beyond "This person worked here from xx to xx". They can't even say if you were fired or not (I'm only 70% sure of this part). So, sure, it'll be on the resume, and the company might even get called up, but there's no reason to think that burning a bridge is going to bite him in the ass unless he needs the reference.

      Of course, YMMV.

      --
      Synergy is your friend
    2. Re:I think he needs it on the resume... by pete6677 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think it will be a big deal. He obviously got this new job without a reference from the psycho manager, so he will have the new manager (hopefully not a psycho) as reference for his next job. He can still list the old place, and if someone wants a reference contact in the future, give them someone other than the psycho manager, who hopefully would have been fired by that point anyway. In summary, you don't necessarily need a reference from your manager to be able to list a job on your resume. Some companies don't even allow managers to give references, so HR departments are used to encountering situations where they can't get a reference from someone's current or previous manager. Just use someone else.

    3. Re:I think he needs it on the resume... by Monkey-Man2000 · · Score: 1

      He said he'd been there 6 or 7 YEARS. I think he needs it on the resume.

      And that alone should impress employers. I think an employer would care little, if as the grand-parent stated, that the boss just resented him leaving. That seems like the most plausible explanation (from the new employer's perspective). Clearly, he was a good and reliable employee otherwise they would have gotten rid of him long ago.

      --
      This post was generated by a Cadre of Uber Monkeys for Monkey-Man2000 (603495).
    4. Re:I think he needs it on the resume... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can't even say if you were fired or not (I'm only 70% sure of this part).

      All my company gives out is yes he/she worked here for such a length of time and wether or not the person is recommened for rehire. Nothing more. nothing less.

    5. Re:I think he needs it on the resume... by Cylix · · Score: 1

      It's a slippery slope actually.

      Unless your state has specific labor laws, they can say anything that is factually true or believed to be held as a reasonable opinion.

      Obviously, if they go on the deep end, they risk a law suit and most organizations just verify employment.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    6. Re:I think he needs it on the resume... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1
      All my company gives out is yes he/she worked here for such a length of time and wether or not the person is recommened for rehire. Nothing more. nothing less

      Yes, but it's that last part: and wether or not the person is recommened for rehire. Withholding a recomendation for rehire is equiv to The Kiss of Death.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    7. Re:I think he needs it on the resume... by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Same in Florida..

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    8. Re:I think he needs it on the resume... by ComputerSlicer23 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Past employers cannot legally give any information beyond "This person worked here from xx to xx".

      You are going to have to cite a statue for that one. I'm incredibly dubious of the claim that I'd be in violation of the law to say more then "this person worked here". I'm unaware of any legal princepal of "Employee-Employer Privacy". Heard of it in the case of laywers and doctors, but never in the case of my boss. I'm fairly confident they can say if you were terminated with cause or not (that's got a legal definition, I'm unaware of all of the details).

      As a general rule, most employers will not say any more then that out of fear of legal retaliation if you fail to get the job. There is precedent for suing former employers due to bad references. Employees have one such cases. I'm unaware of the details, but I see that it is making things harder for interviewers to get enough information to get such an assessment. Hence as a general rule, there's a bit of a wink, wink, nudge, nudge going on during some reference calls to employers who want to say bad things, but don't want to face the legal repercussions.

      I know that it's in our hand book that if I am called as a reference for an employee who worked at my company, I can be fired for discussing past employees. However, that's because I'm creating a legal liability for the company and have no formal HR training to know what the laws and repercussions of what say.

      As a general rule, always say: "I didn't give that person permission to use me as a reference". Anyone who asks who you would not be a good reference for inform them that shouldn't be using you as a reference. Thus what you are saying is honest and true. Anyone you want to say good things about give them permission. Then say only really nice things about them.

      Kirby

    9. Re:I think he needs it on the resume... by badbrownie · · Score: 1

      I worked in the recruiting business for a few years and can tell you (without quoting the statutes) that in California it's common knowledge that giving a negative reference has legal ramifications. I was always trying to eek references out of people whose HR department had given them strict instructions to do no more than confirm they worked there. Apparently there have been cases of people winning lawsuits for receiving bad reviews. Sorry I can't be more concrete but I'm sure most managers and all recruiters in the Bay Area will corroborate.

    10. Re:I think he needs it on the resume... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thinker.

    11. Re:I think he needs it on the resume... by edb · · Score: 1

      You are going to have to cite a statue for that one.

      http://cne.gmu.edu/itcore/images/thinker.gif

      Sorry, couldn't resist.

      --
      In theory, practice and theory are the same. In practice, they rarely are.
    12. Re:I think he needs it on the resume... by madmancarman · · Score: 1
      Past employers cannot legally give any information beyond "This person worked here from xx to xx".

      You are going to have to cite a statue for that one. I'm incredibly dubious of the claim that I'd be in violation of the law to say more then "this person worked here". I'm unaware of any legal princepal of "Employee-Employer Privacy". Heard of it in the case of laywers and doctors, but never in the case of my boss. I'm fairly confident they can say if you were terminated with cause or not (that's got a legal definition, I'm unaware of all of the details).

      For the IT Business class I teach, another teacher and I brought in a manager from GE Aircraft Engines through a program called Junior Achievement, which aims to teach students business skills by providing them with ongoing sessions with someone in the business world. When we were working with him on writing and improving resumes, one of my students asked about the "References" portion of a resume, and he said that there's pretty much no point to putting that on a resume any more. He's done some hiring at GE, and any reference he'd called recently said what the grandparent poster said: HR would only confirm that the person worked from one point in time to another, and refused to go into any further details.

      At another point in the school year, we had a recruiter from a technical school come in, and it happened that he was also an IT headhunter. We asked about job hunting and resume tips, and he agreed that there was no point in putting any references on a resume, because all it did was waste space that could be used to describe your job skills, since HR departments were afraid of getting sued for saying something bad about someone.

      --
      First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Gandhi
    13. Re:I think he needs it on the resume... by SilverspurG · · Score: 1

      And, if you're in good with a manager of an HR department, you'll know that companies (especially large multi-national companies) have worked out hundreds of little tricks for the mgmt at one company to pass unofficial reviews to the inquiring HR dept of another company. The only thing that's required is that the two companies involved are on the same page when it comes to this sort of behavior.

      It's commonly referred to as blackballing. No amount of legislation will ever stop the practice from happening. There can be no lawsuit if the plaintiff can never get their hands on the paperwork.

      You'd have to be an international spy or professional cat burglar to have the skills necessary to catch big companies in the crap they pull.

      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
    14. Re:I think he needs it on the resume... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually there are private detective agencies that can call up a company acting just like the HR from a company that is hiring you, do so from a state where it is legal to record the converstaion that they are having and then go back to the company with a nice little lawsuit to get you a hefty settlement.

  29. Stick with it... by mojatt · · Score: 1

    Regardless of whether or not he's being professional doesn't mean that you shouldn't be. From what you write, it seems like everyone already knows he's a taco short of a combo platter, so your reputation shouldn't suffer too much.

    Even still, if you stay for the duration and he skimps on the final paycheck, take his ass to court...

  30. Easy Answer by DanielMarkham · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've been there, done that.

    Had a couple bosses (especially, for some reason, small development and start-up companies) that lost it.

    The easy answer is: do the right thing. You did the right thing by giving notice, you did the right thing by hanging in there. Go in to work each day and be the best you can. Help hand off the codebase. Give the best training you can to the others.

    The more you do the right thing and your boss acts like an idiot, the better you are doing. Do the right thing and let the rest slide.

    In both of my cases, the old boss felt sorry for acting the way he did. (But this took several months) People get upset when they don't know what to do. Sometimes they act very poorly. My advice is to be a bigger person than that.

    1. Re:Easy Answer by kabdib · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I once left a company that tried to reduce my final check by "negative sick hours" or something like that. Legally they were allowed to do this. However...

      I politely pointed out that I had gotten sick as a direct result of working 80+ hour weeks for them, that they had gotten a good deal out of it, and that reducing my check was unacceptable. I was firm, but very polite.

      I waited in the lobby for 30 minutes and they came back with a check for the full amount.

      If they hadn't . . . well, I had no real plans. Probably would have told all the employees that I knew "socially" there, and then just left it alone.

      [Earlier the previous day, the CEO of the company pulled me off to a lunch meeting where he started bawling and tried to get me to stay. A good place to be out of; their "technology" could have been replaced by 1,000 lines of Perl]

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced technology is insufficiently documented.
    2. Re:Easy Answer by dorko72 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have to agree with this post.

      A few years back, i was in a very similar situation. I had found a great new job and my current employer did not take my resignation and 2 week notice very positively. A week before my resignation we had our office burglarised and a ton of equipment stolen. My boss accused me of being the "ring leader" and told me he would withhold my check until a criminal investigation was held. I was so furious that i decided to not fulfill my two weeks i had promised. On my way out i had a shouting match with him and ended up telling him that the p0rn he had on his computer and was actively downloading using the company's network was not the smartest thing to do. He immedialtely got quiet, ran back and locked himself in his office and began deleting all the files.

      Years have passed since this incident. I dont think i did anything wrong, but i feel i could have been a better professional if i had not gotten down to his level and starting screaming all over the office.

      I suggest you always do your very best. You will eventually be rewarded and will feel better about yourself for doing it.

    3. Re:Easy Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good place to be out of; their "technology" could have been replaced by 1,000 lines of Perl

      Why didn't you replace it with 1000 lines of perl then?

    4. Re:Easy Answer by Bongzilla · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah, me too man.

      One time, I gave my 2 weeks notice, and my manager was sobbing at his desk. Like his puppy just died or something. It was really quite pitiful. Another time, I had to put in notice, and my boss seemed to take it ok, but then as I was leaving work, there was a police car outside, they were taking him away, because apparently he had flipped out and started smashing cars in the parking lot with a baseball bat.

      I mean, I try to do a good job, but it only ever makes for a really codependent relationship with the management.

      --

      ;///////////////////////////////////////////////// /
    5. Re:Easy Answer by grammar+nazi · · Score: 1

      I agree with DanialMarkham. Do the right thing.

      I had a nutty boss that reported to a director that would always take credit for everything good that we did and would blame us for everything bad that he did. Nobody had respect for this guy and he never did anything to deserve it. Anyways, when i finally found another job and gave my notice i worked very hard to make sure i finished up my projects or pass them off. It was the hardest two weeks of work at this job.

      During my last two weeks i worked closely with the director to hand off projects. I had clearly expressed about 10% of my frustrations with my boss to the director. After i left, a coworker heard the director mention about me "His work was a little subpar, but he wrapped things up nicely when he left". Since she only said terrible things about people who had quit prior to me, i considered this a glowing review. That was the nicest thing she ever said about a former employee.

      --

      Keeping /. free of grammatical errors for ~5 years.
    6. Re:Easy Answer by kabdib · · Score: 1

      Easy -- I didn't know Perl then. :-)

      It was a Windows / VB / MFC shop with a really horrorshaw case of very bad code and unclear mission, one of the few real life cases of Cargo Cult Programming that I've encountered. Some of the people there were good, but they were mired in a bunch of people's work who, ah . . . weren't that good. A classic case of "Okay, the VCs bought the song and dance, and we hired some bodies at the job fair, now what?"

      I won't mention (much) the shrink they brought in to interview the engineering staff, or the VC fight, or the guy who swore at me when he was interviewing (then later resubmitted his resume under another name), or the build staff whose jobs I eliminated with a makefile (they were literally copying files around by hand for each release).

      A very entertaining place to work.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced technology is insufficiently documented.
  31. Fear not! by SpeedyRich · · Score: 1

    Timothy

    I don't know whether you're based in the UK, because if you are then you can claim for many, many things and hang this chap out to dry. For example

    * constructive dismissal
    * bullying
    * libel

    The best thing is to consult your trades union representative, a solicitor or citizen's advice bureau.

    Again, if you're in the UK, you can put in a formal grievance (even if he *is* the boss), then take sick leave due to stress. He'd still have to pay you.

    Best of luck with both this and your new job!

    --
    ## NB: Comment here
    1. Re:Fear not! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awesome answer. *High five*

  32. Be cool, but not too cool. by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    My personal advice is to make it known that you will honor your word to work out your remaining time and give 100% while you are there, but if it's outside of your job description to find and train your own replacement don't.

    I don't advise that you do this, but personally, I prefer to make legal threats, but vaguely. It's a subtle thing, you want to make a threat to take legal action that the boss will later wonder if you meant you'd kick his ass.

    After he sweats it out for a night or two, let him raise the issue again, let the veil drop. Let it be known that you were talking about legal channels.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  33. Does your boss have a boss? by Fyz · · Score: 1

    Depending on the size of the company you're working for, your wacko boss may have a boss of his own.

    And seeing as you won't be working for this guy anymore, maybe it would be time to let the boss of him in on what you and (probably) your colleagues think of him.

    That way, even though you may have burned a bridge with him that was already smoldering, you might be able to maintain a general good standing in the company. You former co-workers, who may themselves be higher-ups later in your career, might even appreciate the gesture.

    It can also be a preemptive strike to let him know about your strained relationship with your former boss, so the überboss won't be poisened by his lies...

    1. Re:Does your boss have a boss? by (negative+video) · · Score: 1
      You former co-workers, who may themselves be higher-ups later in your career, might even appreciate the gesture.
      Bingo! And it cuts both ways: you might want to recruit the best of your former colleagues to your new employer.
  34. DEE-fense, DEE-fense! by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 2, Informative

    Don't underestimate what crazy people might do. Be as clean as the driven snow. Make sure you haven't taken anything out of the office. Go over anything you've signed and nail down written documentation that you've complied with it.

    You can turn a conversation into a paper trail by writing a letter along the lines "This is to summarize our conversation of $DATE. I am dismayed that you would think $ACCUSATION, which as I explained is of course incorrect. If I have misunderstood your position please let me know".

    It might be worth the money to consult with an employment-law attorney and ask "here's what I'm doing, I'm dealing with irrational people, what precautions do you suggest?".

    1. Re:DEE-fense, DEE-fense! by Apotsy · · Score: 1
      It might be worth the money to consult with an employment-law attorney

      Considering it's pretty easy to get a "initial" consultation (usually 30 minutes or so) with an attorney like that for free, it's definitely "worth the money [zero]". Just call the local bar association and they will refer you to someone.

  35. Reason with him by EriDay · · Score: 1

    Find a non-threatening situation in which to have a talk with him. He needs to be reminded (in a non-threatening way), that employment is a 2-way street.

    He does not hold all the cards here. You obviously have some leverage, or he wouldn't be behaving the way he is.

    Let him know that the best way for him to find your replacement is to not have a rep as an a-hole.

    Get a special purpose mail account. Offer to answer the first 1 or 2 simple email questions for free. Then figure what you going rate should be, and pick up a few hours of gravey for a month or 2.

  36. the next time he accuses you of anything at all by ChipMonk · · Score: 1

    Tell him to put it in writing. It's the easiest and surest way to call him on his irrationality.

    Then consult a lawyer, if you haven't already.

  37. WorkplaceFairness.org by kitzilla · · Score: 4, Informative
    but I'm pretty sure he's already burned it to the ground, even threatening to withhold my final paycheck if I don't find a replacement before I leave.

    WorkplaceFairness has a few tips along these lines.

    Sounds as if you've given sufficient notice. Unless you're violating some employment covenant, your employer has no legal basis by which to hold your final check and is probably attempting to intimidate you in an unlawful way.

    Be professional, write or say nothing negative, ask for any employer complaint in writing, work out your notice with as much enthusiasm as you can muster, and seek any remedy after the fact.

    This is why we have unions, folks. Or why we *had* unions. The workplace does NOT regulate itself.

    Good luck, and enjoy your new job.

    --
    This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
    1. Re:WorkplaceFairness.org by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      Actually, this is a case of the workplace regulating itself. Employees are leaving due to the actions of an asshole manager. When the company has a hard time retaining or replacing people, they'll eventually realize why and the asshole will get the boot. However, this kind of "self-regulating workplace" works best in a good economy, since employees can be held as virtual hostages in a bad job if there is nothing else available. Rather than relying on unions, if it is even possible, it is better to be marketable enough that a job change is possible should it become necessary.

    2. Re:WorkplaceFairness.org by Bill+Dog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Talented individuals rely on their marketability. The mediocre masses need unions.

      --
      Attention zealots and haters: 00100 00100
    3. Re:WorkplaceFairness.org by kitzilla · · Score: 1
      Actually, this is a case of the workplace regulating itself. Employees are leaving due to the actions of an asshole manager. When the company has a hard time retaining or replacing people, they'll eventually realize why and the asshole will get the boot.

      Right. Unless the manager is the owner, or has naked pictures of the CEO with the secretary. Or is tremndously valuable to the company. Or owns a lot of stock. Or ...

      Workplace law is almost all the fruit of the labor movement. Pity unionism has been largely gutted at the behest of wealthy political interests.

      --
      This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
    4. Re:WorkplaceFairness.org by jwiegley · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The workplace doesn't need to regulate itself. Nor do we need unions or government to regulate it for us.

      All we have to do is start choosing to regulate our own environment. You don't like it? Fine, quit; find another environment, create your own enivronment. You'll probably be more successfull in either case.

      A girl I know keeps working in bad jobs for unfair bosses doing project management for the construction trade. She provides exceptional customer satisfaction and competency. She just switched jobs again; what she should have done was started her own contracting company and buried the competition.

      Again, I'm now stupified as to why we persist in maintaining bad relationships. Are we that desperate to obtain our validation and self worth from external sources? (And yes, I used to in a variety of relationship types. At least I fixed the career.)

      Regulate yourself; don't count on anybody else to do it for you because no one else (Except maybe your mother) has *your* best interests as their agenda; nor do they accurately know what you need. (And I would argue that your monther doesn't either.)

      --
      I will never live for sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine.
    5. Re:WorkplaceFairness.org by jadavis · · Score: 1

      The workplace does NOT regulate itself.

      Huh? If the boss doesn't give him his check, he sues and wins very quickly. How would a union get it to him any faster?

      --
      Social scientists are inspired by theories; scientists are humbled by facts.
    6. Re:WorkplaceFairness.org by Magnus+Reftel · · Score: 1
      Huh? If the boss doesn't give him his check, he sues and wins very quickly. How would a union get it to him any faster?

      By having lawyers on-staff that are specialised in this kind of cases, and aleady paid for by the membership fee.

      I just don't get this. There are regularly complaints on /. about companies abusing the employees, but whenever someone brings up the union, everyone goes apeshit. As long as you don't organize, things like this will continue.

      --
      print "Yet another p{erl,ython} hacker\n",
    7. Re:WorkplaceFairness.org by khallow · · Score: 1
      I just don't get this. There are regularly complaints on /. about companies abusing the employees, but whenever someone brings up the union, everyone goes apeshit. As long as you don't organize, things like this will continue.

      Unions are an unnecessary and expensive middleman. I can handle a bad employer. I also hate it when I forced to pay part of my paycheck to a labor union. Finally, you ignore that historically unions have been used as tools of extortion by organized crime or suborned by political interests. I can't trust organizations that are so easy to subvert and which really don't represent my interests.

  38. How I did it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tell your boss you had an offer for x5 your current salary.

    Don't tell your boss by any means the name of the new company.

    He will agree with you that you must take the offer, unless that is he wants you to stay and is willing to increase your salary times 5.

  39. GET OUT NOW!!! by jt2190 · · Score: 1

    If there is nothing you can do to improve the relationship between you and your employer in your final days, leave now, if you can. By staying you are only incresing the probability that something you do will make the relationship even worse. I doubt you'll be using this guy as a charater reference, anyway.

  40. best way to leave... by KillShill · · Score: 1

    a job on good terms is to be on the phone with the BSA while your boss is "letting" you go... :)

    --
    Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
  41. Two wrongs don't make a right by Malc · · Score: 1

    What kind of person are you? Are you prepared to sink to his level? Just take it on the chin and get on with it. You're moving on so he has no control over you. Threatening to withhold your last pay cheque is the actions of a desparate person trying to control you. Unless there is something in your contract about finding a replacement he has no grounds, although if he follows through you will have to get a lawyer to write them a letter. If you want to be proactive, seek legal advice now. Personally I would wait - how long is your notice period?

  42. leave. now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "even threatening to withhold my final paycheck if I don't find a replacement before I leave." uuhhh that's pretty actionable there (unless it's in your contract which would be a bit odd)... time to go. now. don't pass go etc. etc. also make to sure to notify the companies HR and his management about that crap.

  43. Not To Hard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even with all the accusations - don't ever lose your cool and don't get sucked into arguments. They can be easily infinitely circular and even if the person is shown wrong, he won't admit it and all you've done is feed his bad attitude towards you.

    If you need to talk to your boss, do it at a moment when he's at a good mood, otherwise leave him alone.

    If you can, give him a list of good replacements for you (someone you know is competent and looking for a job) if you filled a vital tech position they don't have someone else already in the company for.

    Ditto redundancy - don't lose your cool - leave the air open for a reconciliation on his part if he so chooses.

  44. Get a Firearm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    If your boss is that crazy, then you should bring a firearm to work. You'll need it to defend yourself.

    1. Re:Get a Firearm by lheal · · Score: 4, Interesting
      N O !

      I'm a 2nd Amendment guy. I believe in the right to keep and bear arms, and I believe that the citizenry should be armed to the teeth and dangerous.

      But it's just plain stupid to bring one to work under these circumstances. It says "disgruntled employee about to go postal", and would give the nutty boss an excuse to have you arrested. You don't want that rep at all.

      I'd bring a lawyer instead, or at least have a lawyer make a phone call. Asking you to provide a replacement before you receive a final paycheck is defrauding you of your pay.

      --
      Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
    2. Re:Get a Firearm by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 2, Insightful


      This is a great idea...oh wait...no it's not....it's the opposite of great....what's that word...oh yeah. TERRIBLE. Yeah, that's it.



      Seriously, though, you really need to establish yourself firmly as the sane, sensible party here. It's unfortunate, but you really do have to go out of your way to insure that you are never percieved as irrational or unreasonable.

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    3. Re:Get a Firearm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're the one who sounds crazy.

    4. Re:Get a Firearm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, just go postal. If people at your place of employment are not sticking up for you, they're as bad as your boss. PURGE THE SYSTEM!

    5. Re:Get a Firearm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I'd bring a lawyer instead, or at least have a lawyer make a phone call.
      > Asking you to provide a replacement before you receive a final paycheck is defrauding you of your pay.

      Agreed. If I were this guy, I'd tell the boss to stuff it, pack my stuff and make TODAY my last day. Then I'd have my lawyer inform him that he owes me pay for all time worked up to and including the last day, and any vacation time accrued. Most states have laws requiring compensation to be paid within 30 days of termination, so make that stick.

    6. Re:Get a Firearm by fm6 · · Score: 1
      Speaking as an anti-2nd Amendment guy: thank you.

      Maybe those of you who love guns but know they're not the solution to every problem can get together with those of us who hate guns but know how firmly embeded they are in American culture. Then maybe we can come up with a set of laws that support proper use of guns for hunting and self-protection, but don't cater to every idiot who thinks he's an action hero.

    7. Re:Get a Firearm by Money+for+Nothin' · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Another 2nd Amendment lover here. Your post is the *best* advice I've seen. I agree with every word...

      Requiring the finding of a replacement, unless it's written into his contract, does seem fraudulent. A lawyer and/or small-claims court (unless the paycheck is too big) are certainly the way to go.

      Packing heat will just make things far, *far* worse.

    8. Re:Get a Firearm by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Or maybe you could research the laws on the books in different states, and discover that this is already the case.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    9. Re:Get a Firearm by boodaman · · Score: 1

      Maybe you could realize that there are hundreds, perhaps many thousands, of gun laws already in place, and adding more does nothing.

      Maybe you could realize that gun laws only affect law-abiding citizens, which are exactly the people that DON'T cause problems with guns. The people who do (they're called criminals) ignore laws against things like rape, murder, assault, and more and there's a really really good chance they'll ignore any other law, gun or not, that you and your friends put on the books.

    10. Re:Get a Firearm by xScruffx · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he could try the inverse. Wear a three-piece Kevlar suit to the office ... just in case.

      It's not paranoia if everybody really is out to get you.

    11. Re:Get a Firearm by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      gun laws only affect law-abiding citizens, which are exactly the people that DON'T cause problems with guns.

      Getting way OT, but I agree. I'm all for more laws against gun ownership here in the UK, where it's possible due to the fact there are hardly any guns in the first place. However, there are just so many guns in the USA it would be impossible to ban them. It would be as stupid as trying to ban pot. Ain't gonna work. The US is based on the idea that you can point a gun at someone and tell them what to do. Don't buck the cart now!!

    12. Re:Get a Firearm by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 1

      What kind of SICK world is this where carrying a gun to the office is frowned upon, but unleashing a lawyer is actually recommended?

      There is NO excuse for bringing legal aids into this. Remember, kids, people don't sue people, lawyers sue people.

      -- :^)

    13. Re:Get a Firearm by boodaman · · Score: 1
      The US is based on the idea that you can point a gun at someone and tell them what to do.

      You have it exactly backwards.

      The US is based on the idea that you can point a gun at someone and keep THEM from telling YOU what to do.

      Ironically, the US developed that point of view specifically because leaders of some places (like the UK) DID point guns at you and tell you what to do.

    14. Re:Get a Firearm by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      Then why does just about every country in the free world allow more personal freedom? How come your government is as corrupt (if not more so) than all the rest of us? Where is the gain you have received from the second amendment, other than the highest crime rates and prison population on the planet?

      I'll agree that guns are about freedom; taking away someone elses. A gun is a pussy's weapon, for those unable to fight for themselves, and for those who wish to take other peoples property. Unfortunately, your history dictates that there are untold numbers of guns in your country (we also agree on why that is the case), so it is necessary for the honest people to own one. I guess that's the difference between our point of views. In my country, you can walk down the street confidently knowing that a four-foot street punk does not have the capabilty to kill you. Worst case, they pull a knife and you can either run or fight, both options being infinately less likely to end in your death. Yours, well anyone could be packing. Growing up in that culture is bound to give you a different perspective.

    15. Re:Get a Firearm by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Laws are usually judged by quality, not quantity.

    16. Re:Get a Firearm by boodaman · · Score: 1

      You have a strange point of view, and a strange way of relating completely unconnected circumstances.

      Our high prison population is not caused by a large number of guns. It is caused by economic and cultural problems, like poor schools, lack of decent jobs, a huge number of single parent and no-parent households, and more. No, I'm not saying all single parent households are bad or lead to crime, I'm saying it is a lot more difficult to raise children by yourself, and when you do, there will be times when you can't be everywhere at once to protect or watch your child, which can lead to your child going astray.

      I'm not sure what you mean by every country in the free world allowing more personal freedom than the US. That comment doesn't make any sense, frankly. Sure, some things that people do are frowned upon by certain segments of American society (the religious right, for example) but that doesn't mean you can't do them, and it certainly doesn't mean those things are illegal.

      I'm not trying to persuade you, that's obviously a lost cause. As I pointed out, a gun allows you to prevent someone else from forcing you to do something you don't want to do. Pretty simple concept, actually.

      A gun may be a "pussy's" weapon in a street fight, but street fights aren't why the Second amendment was written. The reason for the Second amendment was to prevent tyranny and dictatorship in a free society. In short, if the government has all the guns, and you don't have any, what do you do when the government tells you to do something you don't want to do? Where do you run to?

      How do you know your 4 foot street punk isn't armed? You're saying no criminals in the UK have weapons? I find that hard to believe. I'd welcome some proof, and not just something that's anecdotal.

      Like I said, you have it exactly backwards. More gun laws do not keep criminals from having guns, because criminals do not obey the law in the first place (by definition), so why would they obey a gun law?

      I haven't agreed with anything you've said, BTW. On a side note, Canada has a huge number of guns, but much less crime than the US. Kinda lends credence to the idea that high crime and high prison populations aren't directly related to the number of guns now, doesn't it?

    17. Re:Get a Firearm by boodaman · · Score: 1

      Ah, so how do you judge a law's quality? What is the metric? What's your proposal, then? You want more gun laws, how will you guarantee that your laws are "better" (higher "quality" whatever that means) than those already on the books?

    18. Re:Get a Firearm by fm6 · · Score: 1

      You have me confused with somebody who thinks they have all the answers. All I said was that it might be productive if the less kneejerky individuals on both sides of the debate started a dialog. I guess that's not going to happen, since intolerant persons like yourself always seem to dominate the debate.

    19. Re:Get a Firearm by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      It is caused by economic and cultural problems, like poor schools, lack of decent jobs, a huge number of single parent and no-parent households, and more.

      How is that different to anywhere else on the planet? We have exactly the same problems.

      I'm not sure what you mean by every country in the free world allowing more personal freedom than the US.

      Badly worded, my bad. My point was that having the second ammendment has made no difference to freedom. Countries with and without similar gun freedom have more and some have less freedom than you. Currently the trend is for you all to have less freedom, certainly that's the impression an outsiders getting.

      I haven't agreed with anything you've said, BTW.

      Nope, we both agreed that the US has guns due to the whole independance wars thing.

      In short, if the government has all the guns, and you don't have any, what do you do when the government tells you to do something you don't want to do? Where do you run to?

      I'm watching it happen in your country right now. I don't see the second ammendment helping any at all. Perhaps should things get so bad as to be a civil war (doubtful) then they might come into play. But they haven't stopped the war rhetoric and other such things that are destroying America's last remnants of credibility. Nor have they stopped the religious rights attempt to essentially remove the first ammendment and replace it with a copy of the Bible. Bush says "God" almost as much as he saids "terror" in his speaches. Personally, I'd fight more for the first ammendment myself, religious leadership pretty much always goes bad and your founding fathers realised that.

      Most people tout the second as being some form of tynany overthrower. The thought might make sense a hundred years ago, but wars aren't really fought with rifles now. I think we can predict the outcome between a war between the US population and the army. You'd end up just like the Iraqi's; scoring the odd insurgent-style attack rather than winning any battles.

      Kinda lends credence to the idea that high crime and high prison populations aren't directly related to the number of guns now, doesn't it?

      Yup, it's just one of many things that all come together. To be honest, I'd say a bigger cause of the problem in the US is racism. Unless you are White Anglo Saxan Prodestant (wasp), the odds are against you from the start. But guns do make crime so much easier. Killing with a gun is a doddle, it's the same interface as a basic kodak camera. With a knife, it's actually difficult and repulsive. You physically feel the squishyness as it goes in. One wound rarely kills, and even then there are a limited number of places you can actually do some real damage. You also have to be close to do it, and you have to be a hell of a lot more determined to do so. It's not the number of guns that's the problem; it's your countries "love 'em" attitude really. Here guns are stigmatised; over your way you can get posters and coloring-in books.

      How do you know your 4 foot street punk isn't armed? You're saying no criminals in the UK have weapons? I find that hard to believe. I'd welcome some proof, and not just something that's anecdotal.

      Nationmaster is a favourite site of mine, but they only have one stat for firearms I can find, "murders with firearms". Here in 1999, there were 62 murders, and the polulation was 60+ million that year. The per capita figure is therefore one death per million. For the states, the figures were 8,259 deaths for a pop of over 290 million.

      So, UK = 1 in 1,000,000

      and US = 1 in 35,000

      Nuff said...as for annectotal, well, I don't exactly lead a fully legal lifestyle, and I known a lot of questionable characters. I've seen and done things that most folk will never get to see. And throught all this, I've yet to meet someone with a gun. I have never even seen one in the country, with the exception of a .22 rifle on a range at some summer fair years ago.

      This can't hold forever though. The number of guns in my country can only go up, and thanks to action movies and the constant glorification of guns, more and more punks want them.

    20. Re:Get a Firearm by boodaman · · Score: 1

      You have me confused with someone who is intolerant.

      I'm perfectly happy with a dialog, provided it doesn't start with or include "outlaw all guns" or "anyone who owns a gun is a nut".

    21. Re:Get a Firearm by boodaman · · Score: 1

      Unless you are White Anglo Saxan Prodestant (wasp), the odds are against you from the start.

      I heartily disagree, though discussing it would be pointless.

    22. Re:Get a Firearm by fm6 · · Score: 1

      And where did I make either of those statements?

    23. Re:Get a Firearm by boodaman · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I misread your post (http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=148803&thresh old=1&commentsort=0&tid=187&mode=thread&cid=124719 84)

      In it, you state that we need to come up with laws that support the use of guns for hunting and self protection. In my opinion, we already have those laws.

      1) Nasty guns ("machine" guns, automatic rifles, bazookas, tanks, etc) are all illegal and have been for decades.

      2) In most states where people get uptight about guns, there are laws requiring waiting periods, background checks, fingerprinting, mandatory registration, and more for everything that isn't in the "nasty" category and isn't a long gun (shotgun or rifle).

      3) That leaves long guns - shotguns and rifles.

      So, you're unhappy with the current laws. Since the current laws already make "nasty" guns illegal with severe punishment for breaking the laws, and since the current laws in most places place heavy restrictions and registration requirements on handguns (if they aren't illegal outright), you must, therefore, want even stricter laws.

      In my opinion, you can't get any stricter than the current legislation unless you ban guns entirely. Think about it: what more do you want to do? That was my point earlier, which you deflected by saying "I don't have all of the answers" or words to that effect.

      You also made the remark about "cater to every idiot who thinks he's an action hero."

      So, you've got (paraphrasing) "we need more quality laws, the current strict laws aren't good enough" and "some people who have guns think they're action heros".

      In short, you want to have a "dialogue" about "quality laws" but you haven't identified what's wrong with the current laws, though we can guess how you feel about them and law-abiding gun owners in general from your statements. Therefore, in my opinion, your "dialogue" about "quality" gun laws will consist of something along the lines of making all guns impossible to own or nearly so, or making them illegal completely. That's not a dialogue, that's a demand. Because, as I've described, the current laws already make it very difficult or impossible to get a gun that most people would define as "bad" (the nasty ones and handguns). So what more can there be to make you happy except getting rid of all of them, long guns included?

      Maybe you're speaking from the point of view of your particular state, I don't know. But if your state has poor gun laws, that isn't my problem, because my state has good, reasonable gun laws. My state also has areas of high gun crime, but I've already pointed out that more or stricter gun laws will do nothing against criminals because criminals don't obey any law in the first place, let alone a gun law.

  45. OT: Solicitor (UK) means Lawyer (US) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Solicitor: Chiefly British. An attorney who advises clients on legal matters, represents clients in certain lower courts, and prepares cases for barristers to present in the higher courts.

    for the other Americans in the audience.

    - Anonymously bridging the culture devide since roughly 2 pm today

  46. Been there before by u-235-sentinel · · Score: 1

    Had an employer like this once before (who hasnt?). After the third day I told them I had a couple weeks vacation and left on a trip out of state. He apparently thought I would be at home and tried calling. Didn't like the fact he couldn't reach me while on vacation.

    Basically I told him vacation means leaving the office behind. For that matter, quitting means leaving the company behind :-)

    If you have vacation time then I'd take it. You will arrive at your new company less stressfull and they get a great employee ready to go full steam. Sure it might sound like you are leaving the company in a lurch but remember, you ARE leaving them. They will simply have to get over it and move on. That's life.

    --
    Has Comcast disconnected your Internet account? Same here. You can read about it at http://comcastissue.blogspot.com
  47. What would he do? Give you 3 wks notice before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What would he do? Give you 3 wks notice before firing you? No, he'd can you then and there. Do the same, if you wish. Call it a business decision, and let him worry about it. Unless he pays you to recruit for him.

  48. Your boss is setting himself up for a lawsuit. by galaxym100 · · Score: 1

    Your boss is slandering you. I would suggest looking into getting a lawyer. You might want to politely remind him that slavery ended over a hundred years ago ( in this country) and that he does not own you. I am a old fashioned but it seems he has dishonored you and has probably been underpaying you for a long time now. We have a saying in Texas "Money talks and BS walks" and I am sure your state has a similar proverb.

    1. Re:Your boss is setting himself up for a lawsuit. by HaloZero · · Score: 1

      I understand that Texas is huge on the cow thing, but if your bullshit seriously walks, you might want to consider a stronger pesticide.

      --
      Informatus Technologicus
  49. Stick it out... by waterford0069 · · Score: 1
    Stick it out. You made a commitment to be there until a certain date. Be there until told otherwise. Leaving earlier could be considered leaving without notice. In some parts of the world, if an employee quits a job without notice, the employeer is entitled to keep the last two weeks of pay as compensation for the lack of notice (just as if you are througn out on your kiester, typically you will get some sort of severance - two weeks).

    Typically an employer will send you home when you give notice (unless there is some knowledge that really has to be transfered - but you should have already been planning for that in the first place and keeping copious notes). This way there is no opportunity for you to sabotage the operation (even if you think you are leaving on good terms).

    If for some reason your boss does send you home, get it in writing. Then you have some proof that you were send home for the duration of your employment.

    And ofcourse if you don't get your last cheque, you can always sue. Generally a nicely worded letter from an attourny to the owner(s) of the operation should suffice (and raise questions for the jerk to answer).

  50. Hindi vs Hindu. by lecithin · · Score: 1

    Yep. I thought of that right after I wrote it. My bad.

    Regardless, both are obscure enough to make the point that I wanted.

    thanks though.

    I do want to know what this guy changed to though. I left the software industry myself and it is interesting to hear what other folks have done.

    --
    It could be worse, it could be Monday.
    1. Re:Hindi vs Hindu. by lecithin · · Score: 0

      You are correct. A billion is not obscure.

      With respect to the rest of my comments and question it is obscure.

      The Nazi reference means nothing to me.

      "Not to mention that the holiest symbol (swastika)"...

      What was the point?

      I was not making light of 'peoples' and certainly not any culture. So blah.

      --
      It could be worse, it could be Monday.
    2. Re:Hindi vs Hindu. by Idimmu+Xul · · Score: 1

      I've left the software industry to become a gardner, in the hope of joining the military when my computer belly has gone.

      What have you changed to?

      --
      The problem with slashdot is that most of its users were bullied and stuffed into lockers as kids!
    3. Re:Hindi vs Hindu. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You had to invoke Godwin, didn't you?

  51. Actually... by wombatmobile · · Score: 1

    it's cheaper and faster just to ask Slashdot.

  52. Don't worry about it by deanj · · Score: 1

    Jobs like that are poison.

    From the sounds of it, it's a good thing you're leaving. In a job like that, it's ALL about the boss, and what will make him look good. Bosses like that place blame everywhere else, and never where the blame really belongs, squarely on their own shoulders. They ignore ideas and suggestions for new things, and when you turn around and do exactly what they ask for, they try and turn it around as if it's your fault for just doing what they're asking. The boss just can't take personal responsibility, even thought it's THEIR job. It's ALWAYS someone else's fault.

    No matter what you do, it's not going going to be good enough.

    If this comes up in an interview where you need a reference, use co-workers as references, not the boss.

    The boss can't keep that last paycheck without getting in big trouble with the state (check your state's employment office).

    If word gets back to you that the boss is bad-mouthing you, get a lawyer on retainer and sue.

  53. Got a lawyer? by ID10T5 · · Score: 1

    ...and has otherwise attempted to make me look bad in front of employees and long-time clients.

    If what he's saying is not true, seems you may be able to claim damages for slander. However, if it is true, not much you can do here.

    ...even threatening to withhold my final paycheck if I don't find a replacement before I leave.

    Does your job description/contract specify that you need to find your replacement? If not, that particular task is not part of your job duties and therefore your pay cannot be legally withheld. If such a chore is part of your job (but why would you have agreed to such a condition?), I'm sure there are plenty of people looking for tech jobs right now...

    Is it worth sticking out the few weeks I already told him I worked or should I just cut my losses and leave early?"

    Did you document the "few weeks" in your notice, or was it verbal? If it's in writing, you should probably stick with it or it may come back to haunt you later. If it's just verbal, he's got nothing he can hold against you.

    </IANAL>

  54. Be responsible for yourself... by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 2, Interesting
    ...he has since starting making accusations of conspiracy, deceit, and has otherwise attempted to make me look bad in front of employees and long-time clients...

    If you're being honest with yourself and the /. community as a whole, and if you didn't do anything to deserve the flamewar he is waging against you, then I have this to say about your soon-to-be-former boss: He's an idiot. My advice: Simply be respectful. Don't say anything bad about the boss or the job. If anyone asks (even in some sort of exit interview), tell them it was a good job and everything was fine, but you're leaving to make the next step in your career plans. Period. Believe me, in the future, when the topic comes up, people will know who was the wacky one and who was wise.

    At our company, we don't have the best possible wages and benefits. What we have is good, but there are certainly other companies out there that offer something better. Every so often, employees find a "better" job and leave. I've heard what the "big boss" here says when someone gives him notice. He usually bids them farewell, invites them to come back and visit sometime, and generally gives them some advice. For example, if an employee is known around here for something detrimental, the boss will usually remind him (not to rub it in, but rather to help him out) to pay particular attention to that aspect of his work, so he will start the new job on a fresh page.

    In 20 years, we only had one incident. A secretary, who was a complete wacko, got fired. She took customer lists and God only knows what other information with her, and she actually called all the customers and trashed us. She made threats, she did all kinds of stuff... Our boss, being the wise and learned man that he is, told us all not to worry about it. The ending of the story: Customers called and asked what was going on. We explained that we had fired this secretary. They all said things to the effect that, "You're better off without her." People are not stupid, and they understand who's on the up and up...

  55. Use Google! by CypherXero · · Score: 5, Funny

    You could have risked it and put in your name, his name, and the company's name. Then, wait about a week or so, and then tell him to search Google for either of those 3 terms, and watch his face in horror as the number one result is a bunch of geeks are talking about kicking him in the nuts.

  56. Stand up by azav · · Score: 1

    Stand up to him, be a man and let him know in NO UNCERTAIN TERMS that "this adolescent, unprofessional puerile shit will not fly" if he does not back down, and apologize to you and your clients for the damage done to your reputation as well as the illegal activity of threatening to withhold a paycheck, the lawyers will fly. Tell him "you know what's right, show some respect, be a man and stop being a pussy."

    And be REAL sincere, strong and sincere about your opinion.

    Hope this helps. I doubt he has a backbone. If you show yours, my bet is he'll fold.

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
  57. small company makes it harder by gseidman · · Score: 1

    If I'm reading between the lines correctly, the boss you refer to is pretty near the top of the company and there isn't much in the way of an HR department. Policy is probably in short supply, and you may not even have a real contract. If any of this is accurate, you should consult with a lawyer (which does not necessarily mean hiring one; try to get a free consultation).

    Really, there are two issues: your reputation and money you are/will be owed. Given that you already have a job to go to, your reputation is pretty safe as long as you behave well. That means staying through the time you committed to staying when you gave notice. You will have to balance the money you will lose by forfeiting your last paycheck against the time and money it would cost you to deal with it legally. That consultation with a lawyer will help with determining that.

  58. And Now, my two cents... by FyRE666 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Talk to a couple of your more violent friends. Organise a meeting between them and your boss after he leaves work. If he's in hospital for 2 weeks, he'll cease to be your problems.

    Buy him some grapes ;-)

    1. Re:And Now, my two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy him some grapes ;-)

      Or some whiskey bonbons [/not-so-obscure reference to this year's best anime serie, whoever guesses wins a cookie\]

    2. Re:And Now, my two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [/not-so-obscure reference to this year's best anime serie, whoever guesses wins a cookie\]

      Oh, I know!!! It's...

      "NO ONE CARES ABOUT YOUR ANIME FETISH, SON."

      Do I win the prize?

  59. It's only going to get worse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If you don't need references, bail. If you need references but can get them from other people, bail. Basically, it's not going to get any better.

    A friend of mine went through something similar. A client who didn't understand the technology my friend was demonstrating freaked out when my friend said some code he wrote tricked the system into behaving properly. It was a way to explain a coding hack, but it turned out to be a poor choice of words. The idiotic client was so terrified she called and ranted to his boss, who instead of siding with his employee, gave him hell. Within a few days, the boss started questioning his abilities and treating him poorly, accusing him of various things, all of a sudden oblivious to the years of outstanding work he had done. It came to the point where my friend couldn't take it anymore and decided to leave. A few days before he was supposed to resign, a secretary overheard a conversation he was having with coworkers about why he was leaving. The secretary only overheard bits and pieces, and decided to tell his boss that he was talking behind his coworkers' backs. He got fired on the spot, after some three years of hard work, because of hearsay, unfounded accusations, uninformed clients, and an unstable vengeful manager.

    Simply put, you do not want to be around a boss that bears grudges and will abuse his position to express his displeasure. It's not worth it.

  60. legal action by vinn · · Score: 1

    If you don't like the way you're being treated, this may qualify as harassment.
    1. Document each instance of things he's done to you and others that you consider 'nuts'.
    2. Tell him publically you don't like the way you're being treated.
    3. Document each instance someone else has observed such behavior directed at you.

    You then have two options. Take this to your state labor board, which may be completely ineffective if you're a salaried employee. Or, take it to a lawyer. With your hefty settlement you'll be able to afford to work on open source software full time and make the world a better place.

    Your bridges are already burnt - if you can't absolutely guarantee he'll give you a positive recommendation then you have no reason to maintain playing his games.

    --
    ----- obSig
  61. Find a Replacement? No, No, NO! by lax-goalie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    First, it's not his responsibility.

    Second, and more importantly, there are a ton of issues that go into a hiring decision, many of which don't have a thing to do with the specifics of a job. An applicant may have skills, but may not have the right temperament, outlook, or might not be a good fit for the company's culture. (Or a zillion other reasons...)

    I've hired, and I've (thankfully rarely) fired. Bringing on the wrong person isn't good for anyone, and from a company's perspective, is tremendously expensive in time and money.

    Finding your own replacement for a job is just a bad idea all around.

    1. Re:Find a Replacement? No, No, NO! by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1



      Second, and more importantly, there are a ton of issues that go into a hiring decision, many of which don't have a thing to do with the specifics of a job. An applicant may have skills, but may not have the right temperament, outlook, or might not be a good fit for the company's culture. (Or a zillion other reasons...)

      Not only is this completely correct and insightful (mod up, please), it also may be a good way to keep from having to select your own replacement, while getting/remaining in the boss's good graces at the same time.

      Just imagine, "...well, Mr. manager, I'd like to select a replacemet, but frankly, I just don't have the background. I'm afraid that anyone I select may be a bad fit for the company for some reason, since I don't have the experience and skill necessary to do good hiring. You would be far better off selecing a replacement yourself, Sir...you're certainly better at this than I am..."

      After all, you can catch flies much more effectively with honey than with vinegar.

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

  62. I SECOND THIS ADVICE by shpoffo · · Score: 1

    I don't have points to moderate, so I second this opinion - as with others above who have said so as well. Get a letter of recommendation that is accurate and faithful to your work with them. If there is any witholding or reputation damage, consult a lawyer, and consider informing your bos, politely, of this consideration. Make sure communication is clear - because it's clear that he easily feels threatened. The solution to getting the most fair situation for you will probalby involve a little bit of negotiation and maneuvering on your part. Part of it sound like you need to stand up for yourself more.

    .
    -shpoffo

  63. Leave by leaving a condom by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 0

    on ur boss' door knob.

    Then for ur next job when ur employer will ask for reference "what did he do before leaving" and your ex boss goes "left a condom on my door knob", ur current boss will laugh it up and you'll be da shit!

  64. Been there by ariel05 · · Score: 1

    As somebody who's been through something similar several times, I can say these things:

    1. Like everybody else is sommenting: (a) it's NOT your responsibility to find a replacement, and (b) withholding pay is illegal.

    2a. Since you have the new job and you're simply waiting to start, you won't need the reference from this current one. For future jobs, the only thing the company can legally say is (a) the dates you worked and (b) if they would rehire you. Anything else sets them up for a potential lawsuit.

    2b. It's unlikely you will get a useful letter of reference from Mr. Bozo Boss. I wouldn't bother.

    3. If you can afford to cut your losses, and you'd like to have a couple of weeks vacation, then leave. Nobody should have to put up with that garbage. If you can't afford to take unpaid vacation, then unfortunately sucking it up is the only other realistic option (unless you can find temporary contract work for those couple of weeks). And keep in mind, with a new job, you usually can't take any time off for a while anyway.

    4. Don't stress it.... you've got that new job waiting for you, and one way or another, you'll be done with the current job in the next few weeks.

  65. Are you kidding me! by The+Woodworker · · Score: 1

    Do the right thing?!! Speaking from bitter experience, people who do the right thing get screwed in the end. As sad as the reality is, the correct answer is TALK TO AN ATTORNEY! They can give you the best advice on the proper course of action. Also, DOCUMENT EVERYTHING. Get written statements from coworkers that describe your bosses actions. As I'm sure he's pissed off a few in the past, this shouldn't be too difficult. Remember, nice guys finish last. So make sure to screw him before he screws you. (P.S. Sorry for all of the caps)

    --
    Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach him to fish and he'll wipe out the species.
    1. Re:Are you kidding me! by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1
      Remember, nice guys finish last.

      Not necessarily. And jerks don't always end up finishing first, whatever that is. Besides, that's not what it's about anyway. What would you rather have in your history, bad behavior or good behavior? Karma isn't instant (except on Slashdot) and sometimes it doesn't even seem to exist at all, but if you behave like a jerk don't be surprised if it really does come around to haunt you in the end.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    2. Re:Are you kidding me! by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

      "So make sure to screw him before he screws you" is a WHOLE different thing than "cover your ass".

      --
      Privacy is terrorism.
    3. Re:Are you kidding me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to remember that this guy is already on his way out. There's very little that the boss can do at this point to cause him real trouble. So, if he's primarily concerned with maintaining good relations with his past coworkers, doing "the right thing" is probably the best course of action.

      Although, I certainly agree that if he was going to work there for much longer, he should go the careful, lawerful route.

  66. your best course of action... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My suggestions (I assume you are working in the United States):

    1) Make sure you don't leave any personal property at work.

    2) Don't be confrontational or escalate the situation by arguing; if your boss tries to start a fight about it, try to defuse the situation by telling him you want to focus on work for the remaining time you are there. If your boss becomes increasingly hostile leave and don't come back.

    3) Giving notice is nice of you, but it is optional; under the laws of all states you are employed "at will" which means you can leave at any time... and be fired at any time; notice is a courtesy. I have been "escorted off the premises" once when I was let go, and you can bet that is how he would treat you if the shoe was on the other foot.

    3) Your boss can't withhold your pay. His threats are just that--idle threats. If he fails to send you a check you have very strong legal recourse. You do not need a lawyer. Just go to your state house (or town hall) and fill out a form that they have for this purpose. You will get paid in a hurry, guaranteed. There are extremely powerful laws and bureaucratic structures that start operating once you fill out that form. Once again you don't need a lawyer.

  67. Can't withhold pay by artemis67 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Also keep in mind that your boss can't withhold pay that you have worked for. If he threatens you again, just tell him that you'll file a complaint with your state's labor comission, and have them open an investigation. Legally, he can't not pay you for time that you've worked. He can't even pay you at a reduced rate, unless he informed you of it before you worked the hours.

    Hopefully, you only gave him two weeks. I found out the hard way, never give more than two weeks; you might think you're doing the boss a favor, but it just makes things harder on yourself to be known as the "short timer" for a month (or more).

    You should definitely try to finish out your two weeks. Chances are, your boss will cool down sometime after you leave, and you'll want him to be a good reference when you embark on future job searches. At the very least, you don't want him to be a negative reference.

    Your boss may be a total ass, but you should try to honor your word. Your most valuable asset in the business world is your reputation.

    1. Re:Can't withhold pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget to get a lawyer, and get all his whackiness in paper. While your email and other correspondence may all be company property under some of the more aggressive NDA's, you need a lawyer to talk over exactly what paperwork you can hang onto to document him turning into an idiot.

      Get it on paper preferably, email if paper won't do. And know how and where your company backs up correspondence, especially his.

    2. Re:Can't withhold pay by sfriedrich · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Honor your committment but expect nothing in return.

      Old fart story to follow --

      I was working for a -very- small company when I got hired by Apple in '86. I gave them 2 weeks notice and told them that I wanted to make sure that we had a good transition. The next morning I got a phone call from the boss and was told not to come in that day and, "oh, by the way; your last paycheck has been cancelled". Wow, I was a young father and the loss of even a single paycheck was deeply painful to my family.

      I'll never forget the advice that the Apple recruiter (John Boring) gave me when I related the story to him; "Yes, you -can- take this to the labor board and you -will- win... however, you can spend your career looking forward or looking backward... it's up to you where to concentrate." I took his advice, forgot about the offense and the past and had a -GREAT- career at Apple and afterwards. I'd advise you to do the same.

    3. Re:Can't withhold pay by artemis67 · · Score: 1

      Great story.

    4. Re:Can't withhold pay by /dev/trash · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And I bet that old boss is still fucking people out of their wages.

    5. Re:Can't withhold pay by Pxtl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And your old boss went on to fuck over the next dozen people who walked through the door, totally unpunished. Hooray.

      So, if I break into someone's house and steal $500 from his dresser drawer, what is my punishment? Let's compare, shall we?

    6. Re:Can't withhold pay by dbIII · · Score: 1
      And I bet that old boss is still *ing people out of their wages.
      And would be anyway whether someone had a win against them or not. I've been there, worked for a nasty ***! who defrauded clients and staff (eg. we all sit around from 7am drinking coffee, then go out onto the site at 5pm and work 'till 4am on a flat rate while the client is being told we are on overtime and is paying aproprately - and doing this for a few weeks), but each time he got caught with something he just got more bitter and took it out on his next batch of employees and spread nasty stories about anyone who had the gall to leave. The money to pay off fines is just screwed out of the next guys wages. This paticular guy let everyone know that he always carried a knife for protection at work - a very bizzare attitude for a metallurgist in a state capital city!
    7. Re:Can't withhold pay by Kjella · · Score: 1

      I'll never forget the advice that the Apple recruiter (John Boring) gave me when I related the story to him; "Yes, you -can- take this to the labor board and you -will- win... however, you can spend your career looking forward or looking backward... it's up to you where to concentrate."

      Read: Do we want an employee who is 100% concentrating on his job with this company, or one that is spending a time and effort on a lawsuit (which ultimately, would probably detract from your work performance)? I think the recruiter suggested the path that was best for *them*, not *you*.

      Kjella

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    8. Re:Can't withhold pay by deadweight · · Score: 1

      Translated: Letting your boss steal YOUR money is OK. We would LOVE to have an employee that wouldn't do anything about that.

    9. Re:Can't withhold pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, Apple has always had issues with backwards compatability.

      j/k :-)

    10. Re:Can't withhold pay by dillon_rinker · · Score: 1

      Frank Herbert has this to say about your experience:

      "You've heard of animals chewing off a leg to escape a trap? That's an animal kind of trick. A human would remain in the trap, endure the pain, feigning death that he might kill the trapper and remove a threat to his kind." - Reverend Mother Gaius Helen Mohiam

      Your anecdote is a perfect example of why evil prospers in this world. Great evil prospers because small evils are left unchecked. Never miss an opportunity to force people to confront the fact that what they are doing is evil. Never miss an opportunity to force evildoers to face the consequences of their actions. Failure to do so is not merely inaction; it is encouragement of evil. In your case, you permitted your boss to profit by exactly the amount that he withheld from you.

      Yeah, yeah, I'm taking it too seriously and stomping all over your largely reasonable advice. Call it an effect of what's happened in my life and my foul mood today. But at least think about what I said.

    11. Re:Can't withhold pay by 80sCartoons.net · · Score: 1

      I've only given more than two weeks notice once. That one time, I had a wonderful boss who treated me well, had a great team of people under me that I was helping to train to take my place, and a good working environment. I still found it hard to get done all the things that needed to be done: knowledge transfers, training, finishing projects, documentation, paperwork, etc. I can't imagine the pressure that would come if I hadn't had a good boss/good team. I wouldn't have wanted to stay those extra weeks. The poster is right. More than two weeks is probably long enough for most positions.

  68. Did you sign a contract when you started? by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

    These days, you have to be careful when you start a new job. They'll put a contract in front of you, and a lot of times is may state that if you don't provide notice, you forefeit your last paycheck and/or your vacation time, etc.

    Before leaving any job, RE-Read the contract you signed when you took the job (if you did).

    I develop a lot of my own IP, and I had to strike a few clauses (with my attorney's help of course) that said that _any_ IP I developed while employed at the company belonged to them. They were reasonable and accepted my changes.

    Legalese can really bite you in the arse if you aren't careful.

    --
    Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
  69. The best way is to shut up. by ObiWonKanblomi · · Score: 1

    First off, you are under no obligation to tell your employer why you are leaving. There are a couple reasons why you want to do this:

    1. If you state any reason, this may come to haunt you later in a future job search. Your boss may try to abuse your wording as to your reason of leaving, which can set off a paranoia flag in the back of the interested future employer's mind. By future employer, I don't mean the company you'll be going to, but one in the future.

    2. You will always need to keep your story 100% straight. Bosses tend to know other bosses, regardless of industry. =/

    I realize you're in a small company, but you don't want to give anyone any reason for creating doubt in your future job search.

  70. Management Responsibilities by cyberscout · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Always dangerous to respond with limited details of a situation, but here are some basics that may help:

    1. Put the onus of responsibility on him (management) where it belongs. Ask him to meet all the aspects of the new job you like (i.e. pay, benefits, responsibilities/tools, commute, working from home, etc). Note: He won't meet these requests, but, it puts focus back on the things for which you are leaving rather than his charactor assasiniation. Don't give him more time as he "works" to meet your needs either. :-)

    2. If you were so horrible (as it sounds like he is accusing you of) then why did he (management) keep you for 6-7 years? It begins to look pretty strange to anyone (peers or other management types) once that logic emerges

    3. Continue to be professional, in spite of his lack of professionalism. Keep a journal of things said to you for potential legal action later should he follow through with his threats to withold pay. (Please tell me you did not send this message from work, which would fall outside this "professionalism" suggestion... calling a boss names in open forum that can be traced to you would be a bad thing...) :-)

    Best of luck to you, sorry you are having a rough path out to bigger and better things...

    CS

  71. status report before leaving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    One thing you might want to think about doing is a status report that you can give to your boss and either the HR department or your boss's boss. That way, you have in writing the status of projects and any major issues still open and your boss can't "blame" you for things that he may not have done correctly.

    Also, don't think it's legal for them to withhold your paycheck and the things he is saying could be grounds for slander...I'm sure the HR department would be very interested in that.

  72. Murder by mnemonic_ · · Score: 1

    I know what your situation is like. I have often found, quite inconveniently, that killing your boss is the only solution.

  73. Step 1 by spikedvodka · · Score: 1

    Look for the posters that are required by law to be "posted conspiciously in a location easily accessable by all employees" both for the Federal, and the State requirements.
    for example, in Maine
    # Employers must pay wages to employees on an established day or date at regular intervals not to exceed 16 days.
    # Employees must be paid for the work performed. Employees who leave a job must be paid in full within a reasonable time.
    # Employers cannot deduct from an employee's pay for things such as broken merchandise or bills not paid by customers.

    --
    I will not give in to the terrorists. I will not become fearful.
  74. Hapenny by fm6 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    There is no excuse for this sort of behavior. Period. Next time he tries to do it, confront him. Remember, at this point, he needs you a lot more than you need him.
    Which works if the boss is rational enough to act in his own self-interest. Doesn't like concept applies here.
    You know, strictly speaking, it is his responsibility to find a replacement for your position, not yours. You should remind him of this in no uncertain terms.
    And of course, he will say, "Oh silly me, you're right! Never mind!"

    It's pretty obvious what's going on here: the boss is out of his depth, his own job is in jeopardy, maybe his personal life is also in the toilet, and he's blaming everyone but himself for his woes. Under those circumstances, confrontation of any kind is unlikely to help things, and could easily make things worse. What do I mean by "worse"? Maybe just a few harsh words, but this is a classic formula for workplace violence. One should step carefully.

    The threat to withhold the final paycheck is, of course, illegal. The way to deal with this is to politely remind the boss of that fact. If that produces more outbursts, then you should take it to the HR department, and maybe your boss's boss, both of whom will be quite concerned at the legal exposure such a threat creates. Or, if the boss is also the proprietor, you should talk to the state employment commission.

    And you should probably depart as soon as your statutory two weeks is up. There are many good reasons to remain longer: you want to act professionally, you don't want to leave your co-workers in the lurch, etc. But they just don't apply when you're being abused and threatened in this way.

    1. Re:Hapenny by bigpat · · Score: 1

      "And of course, he will say, "Oh silly me, you're right! Never mind!"

      Actually a lot of times confrontation will make the person realized they were out of line. Just keep it simple straightforward and as impersonal as possible. If the person acknowledges their fault, don't press it. Even if they don't then don't press it because it might just take some time to sink in. Threats or insinuation on their part ultimately will only make them look bad. the key is not to escalate any tensions. Leaving a job can place great stress, especially in a small company. It is always best to be as understanding as possible without compromising anything important.

    2. Re:Hapenny by fm6 · · Score: 1
      Actually a lot of times confrontation will make the person realized they were out of line.
      If that's your experience, you've been a lot luckier than I have. Even if you're right most of the time (and I don't think you are), we're not talking about confront or normal -- or rational -- person.
    3. Re:Hapenny by LarsWestergren · · Score: 1

      The threat to withhold the final paycheck is, of course, illegal. The way to deal with this is to politely remind the boss of that fact. If that produces more outbursts, then you should take it to the HR department, and maybe your boss's boss, both of whom will be quite concerned at the legal exposure such a threat creates. Or, if the boss is also the proprietor, you should talk to the state employment commission.

      If you lived in Europe, the first step would probably be to talk to your union, and/or an ombudsman. :-)

      --

      Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die

    4. Re:Hapenny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Under those circumstances, confrontation of any kind is unlikely to help things, and could easily make things worse. What do I mean by "worse"? Maybe just a few harsh words, but this is a classic formula for workplace violence. One should step carefully.

      No, one should confront him. Argue forcefully points on which you know are correct: tell him he is going to pay you, he's going to pay you in a timely manner, and he is going to comply with the law in this manner.

      If he gets angry enough to be violent, don't even bother to block the first punch. Just take it like a man, and make sure there are a lot of witnesses. Then scream for security, and call the police, and have him arrested. Make sure everyone knows this man attacked you, after you confronted him for trying to cheat you out of your wages.

      Sue his ass off in civil court, and get him thrown in jail for assault. Tell the company that they're going to be in the newspapers unless they make financial reparations for the damages their poor choice of manager have caused. They'll probably settle rather than take the bad PR. At the very least, you'll be able to force a good written reference out of them.

      If your manager really is violent, he deserves to be in jail, and the company deserves to pay out for keeping such an unstable individual on the payroll.

      In short, stand up for yourself. Make your boss and your company take the consequences for their actions: don't let them intimidate you, when they're in the wrong.
      --
      AC

  75. Since you have another job waiting... by mark-t · · Score: 1

    Continue to work for the time you originally said you would. Don't worry about them withholding your final paycheque. If he brings it up again, tell him he can't do that, and then ignore the threat. If he actually _does_ withhold your final paycheque, you have a legal claim against him that you will have absolutely no problem getting resolved.

  76. Act in a professional manner by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously - don't sink to his level, make threats or do anything unethical - he will just use it against you.

    Keep records of anything they accuse you of and what you are doing your last few weeks.

    If, after you leave they try to withhold your last paycheck just file a complaint with your state deptartment of employment. Every state I am familiar with has strict laws about requiring that you get paid for time worked. The state I work in has a law stating that the only reason an employer can withhold wages is if there is a court order in place.

    Later, if you feel that your former employer is trying to do something to damage your reputation, talk to a lawyer. This sort of slander is viewed very dimly in the courts.

    1. Re:Act in a professional manner by TheHawke · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. If the joker does withhold your paycheck, nail that SOB agianst the wall with the state DA holding the ballbat. You can effectively cripple his operation if his activites warrant a deeper investigation by the DOL and the IRS.

      Make a casual note to him if he does try to withold payment that "Unkle Sam" may hold a dim view on this matter. He'll get the picture that you are not fooling around.

      --
      First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
    2. Re:Act in a professional manner by Phil06 · · Score: 1

      Don't get a solicitor or file a complaint. If you take some action you get your name in a database that could hurt your job chances later. A threat of filing is enough. Next time he mentions the paycheck, get a notepad out and make an attempt to write what he says verbatim, asking him to repeat. He'll get the idea.

      --
      "...and yet, I blame society" Duke - Repo Man
    3. Re:Act in a professional manner by dbIII · · Score: 1
      Keep records of anything they accuse you of and what you are doing your last few weeks.
      Good point, but it doesn't help if you are accused of things that happened before and after you worked there! This happened to me, but after the same horrors were ascribed to three or four different people that happened to be the object of ire of the time, the ex-boss was starting to get a bad reputation on the basis of those stories and no-one cared who he named in them.

      Don't worry too much about it - people who set out to destroy others reputations tend to do it a lot, and so are not taken seriously.

    4. Re:Act in a professional manner by khallow · · Score: 1
      Don't get a solicitor or file a complaint. If you take some action you get your name in a database that could hurt your job chances later. A threat of filing is enough. Next time he mentions the paycheck, get a notepad out and make an attempt to write what he says verbatim, asking him to repeat. He'll get the idea.

      I disagree. First, the soon to be ex-boss may be able to put worse things in that hypothetical database. Second, I don't know how it is in the UK, but I doubt that getting a solicitor will in itself get you in the fabled database.

      Frankly, just name-dropping that you have a lawyer (even if you don't) probably will have the desired impact. I believe this sort of creature fears lawyers, and the mere threat that your affairs could be managed by a dangerously competent lawyer is probably enough to keep them at bay.

  77. Obligatory by kryogen1x · · Score: 1
    1.Get two of your friends to upload a virus onto your employer's network.

    2. Resign.

    3. ???

    4. Profit!

    1. Re:Obligatory by TheHawke · · Score: 1

      Forgot one

      5. Live for 5-25 in Leavenworth, servicing Tiny and his buddies.

      Don't even THINK about doing this one kiddies.

      --
      First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
    2. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think someone missed the humor in that post, mmmkay?

    3. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, I seem to have missed it too.

      Surely you don't think the obvious recycling of an incredibly tired joke is actually "humor", right?

  78. Don't bother looking back. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Put in your time, leave, and never give it another thought. A boss like that won't be pleased (or sated, whichever is more appropriate) no matter what you do.

    steve

  79. I get this one all the time.... by L0phtpDK · · Score: 1

    Tell your soon-to-be-ex-boss this: "It's not you... It's me..." He'll understand.

  80. He doesn't even have to file suit... by Senjutsu · · Score: 1

    Both his State's labor board and the IRS would be very interested to know that he was withholding wages.

  81. They cannot legally withhold your paycheck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go tell HR/payroll that he threatened to withhold your paycheck, and if they don't act, talk to the state labor board or whatever it's called in your state. By the way, in California, it is illegal for an employer to tell you to not discuss your salary with other employees.

  82. Labor law protects the employee by daff2k · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There's something called "labor law" (hope that's the correct term in English) which is there to protect employees from threats (and actions) exactly like the ones your boss seems to be making. At least in Europe, but I am very sure there's an equivalent in the US, too.

    All you need to do is to look into your contract and be sure to have complied with the terms of notice (again, hopefully the correct term in English). If you did then you are entitled to your final paychecks, dismissal pay (correct term?), etc.

    Your boss has no rights whatsoever to withhold any of your paychecks or to talk badly about you or your work if you quit your job in accordance with your contract. Of course there's nothing to keep him from opening his mouth and being "a bit nuts", but he may not do anything which would be to your disadvantage.

    If you are in doubt you might want to contact a lawyer or look into the code yourself. You do not need to take shit like that from him (or any other supervisor).

    --
    And which parallel universe did you crawl out of?
  83. Attorney's fees? by tepples · · Score: 1

    And he CANNOT withhold your paycheck. He will open himself up not only to a lawsuit from you (that you will win)

    How much does an attorney charge vs. how much is that paycheck?

    1. Re:Attorney's fees? by bluGill · · Score: 1

      Any compitent lawyer will ask for lawyer fees on top of the paycheck. In many cases you can get other damages as well.

      Though your point still stands. The amount you get may not be worth it. Counting time off work at the new job you may end up losing money.

  84. what i'd do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pour a bag of quikset concrete down the boss's favorite toilet on the night you leave. always good for a hoot and a holler.

    (this is just a joke. one of my friends manages an apt. building and a lowlifer did this to one of the apts. on the way out. had to saw through the slab to fix it)

  85. How much does it mean to you? by Cooty · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Whether or not it is important to leave a job on good terms is a personal issue for you to answer, not a question for the community. It might make a difference in your future career but it is much more a question of personality, and whether you would regret the bad blood.

    If you decide you do want to leave on good terms, best approach IMO is to talk to the nut directly, don't go behind his back or get anyone else to intervene on your behalf. Try to be the hurt pal, let him know how you want to be remembered as a good worker, that you were there a long time, that it bothers you he could think you were causing trouble, and so on. It might not work right away, or at all, but if so you'll know for sure there was nothing more you could do. You may have every right to be angry (we can't know for sure, but it seems you do) but acting angry does no good if what you want to accomplish is to calm down the paranoid.

    And if it doesn't work, *then* calmly make sure you've covered all your bases: dot your i's and cross your t's, keep proof of everything, and don't say anything stupid.

    In my own experience I've felt sometimes it was worth going the extra mile to make someone happy, and sometimes it wasn't.

  86. Your work by varmittang · · Score: 1

    As long as your work for your clients are finished, I would have put in for vacation for the last week if you knew far enough ahead of time. But have yourself still on call for emergencies, or if clients want to speak with you personally. This allows you to be out of the loop of working there but allows you to keep working with some clients if need be, and it also gives you some rest before starting your new job. If this was short notice, got a job and next day handing in a 2 weeks notice, they will always take that in a bad way, like you are jumping ship on them.

    --
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    12345
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
  87. Withholding Vacation is Not Illegal by SpikeSpiff · · Score: 0

    Withholding payment for accrued vacation time is not illegal, and is a common tactic for ensuring "good behavior" during the last days of employment.

    --
    "All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke
    1. Re:Withholding Vacation is Not Illegal by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Withholding payment for accrued vacation time is not illegal, and is a common tactic for ensuring "good behavior" during the last days of employment.

      Many states require the company to pay for accrued vacation time. If so, it is indeed illegal.

    2. Re:Withholding Vacation is Not Illegal by Guido+von+Guido · · Score: 1
      It depends at least in part how they handle vacation. For instance, my employer allots two weeks (or whatever) at the beginning of the year. You can take it all then, and it doesn't carry over to the next year. As a result, they're not obligated to pay you anything for vacation when you leave.

      The result, of course, is that anybody who's thinking of quitting takes all their vacation early in the year. Often they take it after they've given notice.

      However, it is a clear and well-stated policy.

    3. Re:Withholding Vacation is Not Illegal by pilsner.urquell · · Score: 1

      Many states require the company to pay for accrued vacation time. If so, it is indeed illegal.
      Very true. I quit over vacation pay withheld, I took it to the state and collected my vacation pay and unemployment.

    4. Re:Withholding Vacation is Not Illegal by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      You can take it all then, and it doesn't carry over to the next year. As a result, they're not obligated to pay you anything for vacation when you leave.

      I would say that it depends on the particular laws for your state. Since there is no national requirement for payment for accrued vacation time, what you are owed is going to depend on the state where you work. If you work in a state that doesn't require that it paid you are governed by company policies.

      It's about 50-50 - about 1/2 the states require it, 1/2 do not.

    5. Re:Withholding Vacation is Not Illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your contract says you get 2 days a month paid vacation and you've accrued the days, they have to pay you.

      I had a frigging USA STATE GOV. agency try to screw me out of accrued vacation. Another agency of the same state adjusted their attitude ;-)

  88. I do not think it means what you think it means by Safety+Cap · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A contract cannot override the law.

    --
    Yeah, right.
    1. Re:I do not think it means what you think it means by Krusty_Klown · · Score: 1

      I also think that any contract that does violate the law is null and void.

    2. Re:I do not think it means what you think it means by coopseruantalon · · Score: 0, Redundant

      well... DUH...

    3. Re:I do not think it means what you think it means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most contracts have clauses that state if any particular part/section of such contract is considered to be unlawful that the rest of the contract is still considered to be upheld.

    4. Re:I do not think it means what you think it means by larien · · Score: 1
      No, it depends on the law. There are many laws, certainly in the UK that say something to the effect that there is a default position unless the contract overrides it. There are also several laws that say that a contract cannot override the law or at least specific portions of it.

      For example, we have the Sale of Goods Act covering sales; this cannot be overriden when selling to an individual and grants the buyer certain rights. However, when selling to a business, rights can be negotiated away, presumably on the basis that the business is in a better position to handle itself.

    5. Re:I do not think it means what you think it means by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      In the US, in every state, employment is strictly voluntary on the behalf of the employer as well as the employee. You can quit at will and they can fire you at will, it's in every piece of paperwork I've ever signed. Now, what you do after you quit can be regulated to a certain extent (i.e. non-compete clauses, which are illegal in some states, should be in all states though). But for the average joe, you can lose your job tomorrow, or you can quit tomorrow, there's very little certainty. Government jobs may be different but standard company jobs work this way.

    6. Re:I do not think it means what you think it means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually... it is perfectly normal and common to override the law in a contract. Unless the activity in the contract itself is illegal, the parties to a contract are free to agree to just about any terms they desire. This is often done when deciding who will be responsible for damages that result from some kinds of breachs. As long as the amount is for liquidated damages instead of penal in nature it should be allowed by the court. However, if the parties did not have equal barganing power when they negotiated or signed the contract, the court may not give effect to those terms.

    7. Re:I do not think it means what you think it means by way2trivial · · Score: 1

      understand, your experience is not comprehensive.

      ever heard of the term "golden parachute"?

      ever heard of an executive getting the ax, and getting a huge payment "In lieu of separation"?

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    8. Re:I do not think it means what you think it means by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      Those aren't standard company jobs that 99% of anyone will ever see. Those are the top 1% CEO/CFO/whatever positions that come with exceptionally wonderful exit bonuses and/or pensions. So in fact, they are simply not relevant.

    9. Re:I do not think it means what you think it means by SilverspurG · · Score: 1

      I think that falls under "We're going to try and pull as much illegal crap as possible to turn you into a human slave because we know you can't afford to be without a paycheck or the lawyer to call our bluff."

      Either way, it's dishonest and unethical. If I find someone's not playing by the rules then I summarily dismiss any respect I may have ever had for them.

      That's the way I feel about my employers, past and present, and my government.

      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
    10. Re:I do not think it means what you think it means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what if that clause is invalid?

    11. Re:I do not think it means what you think it means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One right off the top of my head.

      Carly Fiorina. ex-CEO, HP.

      Got thrown out.

      Got $14 million in severance pay.
      Got a $7.4 million bonus for meeting certain performance goals in 2004 and 1Q 2005.

      HP also threw in $50,000 for legal, financial and career counseling to get rid of her.

      She's also entitled to a pension of at least $200,000 a year.

      Rich bitch, even if she's dragged to the floor (figuratively).

      Oh. I nearly forgot. She gets to keep her computer, and is entitled to tech support for it.

      The truth is, not all CEO's get thrown out. More so, all these upper-mgmt. shitheads are not representative of whole workforces at companies.

      So what.

    12. Re:I do not think it means what you think it means by untaken_name · · Score: 2, Funny

      A contract cannot override the law.

      Oh, man. Wait till Satan hears about this one! He's gonna be PISSED.

    13. Re:I do not think it means what you think it means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually that is just redundant language that reinforces what is AFAIK the law in all parts of the US. As long as the bulk of the contract is legal, one term that violates the law will not invalidate the entire contract.

      Example (from real life):
      A tenant signs a lease. In the lease are various terms of the lease including payment requirements, no pets are allowed, blahblahblah. However, also included is a term stating that the tenants must shovel the snow in front of the apartment building. However, city laws state specifically that the owner of the building is required to maintain the sidewalks and shovel the snow. Tenant (college kids- go home for winter break) does not shovel the snow through several snowstorms. The fines pile up and escalate to the point where $1000 is owed to the city. Landlord threatens to take it out of the deposit. Tenants sue, and take him to court. The tenants win and the landlord is stuck with the fine (because a contract can not override a law), but the lease is still 100% valid otherwise.

      Another example (contrived):
      A contract is made between two companies to price-fix certain products. One term of this contract is that as a part of this agreement, Company A agrees to sell Company B 50,000 widgets for the market price (nothing illegal about this). A dispute ensues, and Company B refuses to buy the widgets and Company A sues. The result of this case would be that the entire contract is void since the primary basis of the contract (I forget the specific legal term) is illegal.

      Of course this all varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, and is based upon knowledge attained from a college contract law class two years ago. So take it with a grain of salt for any specific situation, but that is just how it generally works.

  89. Be polite but firm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Based on what you've said, you tried leaving gracefully and in good terms, but he shot that down. Continue being polite and see if he settles down a bit. If not, confront him about it. Be polite about the situation but firm. Just talk it out and get to the root of the problem and figure out a way to peacefully leave... ...Or better yet, when he falls asleep in his office put his hand in warm water...

  90. If he's insulting you... by r_jensen11 · · Score: 0

    ...should he be held libel (assuming he is making information up), or at least harrassing you? That is law-suit-worthy, and can be used as leverage, should the situation arise. But I wouldn't really make it known to him that you could do such, because he could accuse you of blackmail. Best of luck

  91. leave with a good feeling in your heart by Devlin-du-GEnie · · Score: 1

    1) Keep your word. Stay until the end date that you promised. Nobody likes a liar.

    2) Document everything on paper.

    3) Get witnesses. Don't hold any critical employment conversations without a third party present.

    4) Request an exit interview. At it, deliver a copy of your documentation.

    5) Buy a farewell lunch for your co-workers to celebrate your departure.

    6) Leave with a smile.

  92. they can't withold any pay (at least not in Cali) by fatjesus · · Score: 1

    I don't like to burn bridges, but I'm pretty sure he's already burned it to the ground, even threatening to withhold my final paycheck if I don't find a replacement before I leave.

    I'm not sure where y'all are from, but in California your employer has to pay you the amount of money that you think they owe you when you leave a job. If you make unreasonable claims, then they have to pay you anyhow and take you to court to get it back. It's in the labor code somewhere. I cited this myself once when leaving a job and I got all of the money that was I owed right away.

  93. GET A LAWYER GET A LAWYER GET A LAWYER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this is guy is DEFAMING you, GET A LAWYER !!!

  94. Smile, Be Nice, Make a Good Last Impression by 4of12 · · Score: 1

    even threatening to withhold my final paycheck if I don't find a replacement before I leave.

    That's obviously his job to do. But since he also neglected the other part of his job - namely to nurture and retain valuable employees (like you), it's indicative that you're making a good move away from an incompetent boss.

    Notwithstanding all the screwy crappy behavior, do not bad mouth your company or your boss.

    Be nice, wish everyone well, and offer to spend time answering questions and handing off your currently active job responsibilities to anyone that the boss wants to take them over.

    You never ever want to burn a bridge. Because you never ever know for sure if you'll need to try to come back over it.

    Although it looks as if some folks aren't expecting to need good references in the future to have a chance to work again with John Bolton:)

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  95. Just did the same thing! by kuleiana · · Score: 1

    Aloha Timothy;

    I just had to do the same thing, although my experience was bit more pleasant. I do understand the former, nasty boss syndrome. The only hold they have over you is withholding payment and damage to your reputation. It sounds like you're no longer too concerned about clients believing your boss, and withholding payment in this case isn't right or legal. Someone up the list suggested contacting your boss' boss. It will help if your boss does have one. Otherwise, you'll need to request a private meeting with him/her, and in it you need to not back down, first asking what their reasoning is in thinking that they need to threaten you with withholding payment, and second that you will not back down and it's illegal, only if the conversation comes to that. As a last resort - and this is painful and can be difficult, I know - you may have to cut your losses short, and risk leaving without being paid. Obviously having a new job that's much better will more than make up for it eventually, but you may suffer difficulty not being able to pay the bills for several critical weeks, if not a month! Whew! I understand what you're going through!

    I am quite sure that if you decide to be tough, fair and determined not to be screwed into the ground by this, you will come out a better, stronger, and most importantly paid individual.

    Good luck and keep us informed of what happens!

    --
    Thinkingman.com New Media
  96. ignore him... by Pe_Ell · · Score: 1

    You are being nice by giving them notice. They can't make you stay longer in order to find a replacement. The fact that your boss can't cope with stress isn't your problem. And in terms of future jobs you can always put down someone else as a reference from the company. Just don't pee on everything on your way out and you should be fine. :)

    --
    Midget Tosser
  97. Nuke Em! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That kind of response means only one option - the final one!

  98. Reply by scottinflorida · · Score: 1

    Punch him in the face as soon as possible. Try to do it in front of the staff. Extra points if he crys.

  99. no for another reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you find a replacement you'll be responsible for that replacement going forward into the future. You need to make a clean break. Your boss needs to find someone else to form a relationship with, what's he going to do if anything goes wrong with the new person, track you down and get you to solve that problem too? No way, if this new person were to have problems are you going to find yourself in court? What if there's a leak of company info, you want to be on the suspect list because your 'plant' is still working there? Forget it.

    1. Re:no for another reason by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1


      If you find a replacement you'll be responsible for that replacement going forward into the future.

      This is an excellent point against selecting a replacement for your position, and it's one that didn't even occur to me.

      Mod parent up, please.

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

  100. You have a new job and your boss is going nuts by Clived · · Score: 1

    I've been there. My approach was to be as polite but direct as possible. You extended him the professional courtesy of a letter of resignation and a period of notice. If he can't repond in a professional manner, I would a) walk out and b) send him a lawyer's letter if he decides to withhold wages earned by yourself.

    My two bits

    --
    Clive DaSilva Email: clive.dasilva@gmail.com Ubuntu 18.10 Kernel 4.18
  101. Don't mess with the monkey... by introvertSoul · · Score: 0

    ...or he will mess back with you!

  102. It's poisonous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's poisonous. They made a movie about it.

  103. Anonymous reader writes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An anonymous reader writes "I've been working for a small development ...

    Seems like he's an anonymous writer too, if he didn't leave his name.

  104. Do the best of both worlds. by NanotechLobster · · Score: 1

    First get your paycheck, and then because you are such a nice guy, find a completely innept replacement for yourself.

  105. Holding final paycheck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know where you are located but, in many jurisdictions, it is illegal for an employer to refuse to give you your final paycheck.

  106. To escalate or not to escalate? by gvc · · Score: 1

    It is tough to determine the best tactic in your case - if your employer is making your work situation intolerable you may end up having to quit. I would lay a paper trail confirming that you both agreed you would continue to X date. Then enumerate your issues in a letter stating that you consider that his unreasonable actions breach your employment contract (even your verbal agreement to stay until X is a contract) and must be remedied.

    Above all else, don't act in anger and always be respectful. Assume everything you say will be recorded forever for posterity. Simply don't say or do anything you won't be proud of later. The best possible outcome would be to restore a level of rapport such that you could finish the agreed-on notice period. If you feel forced to leave you may have legal recourse, but that shouldn't be your primary objective.

    What comes around goes around. Even if your even-handed behavior is unrequited at this time, it may be appreciated - by your employer or by a third party - later. Who knows when and in what circumstance you may next cross his path.

  107. Polite but firm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My advice is whatever he does or says be unexpectedly nice to him, take it as like a challenge.

    At the same time you have to make it clear that you are doing X or Y and Z for him but you do need to be paid as you have financial commitments.

    If things look bad take legal advice from a union/solicitor or whatever.

    Remember your preferred outcomes in priority order are.

    A) Leave on good terms, with pay.
    B) Leave with pay.
    C) Leave.

    Remember that, and the fact that you will be gone soon anyway and don't get pissed off and do something stupid.

  108. Try to be nice by Mantorp · · Score: 1

    whether your leaving your spuse or your job, just be nice. It'll serve you better in the long run.

  109. Your integrity by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1
    You gave notice and agreed to work for that period. Even if he is being an asshole, that is not a reason for going back on your word.


    But....


    Him making those accusations, can be considered slander and can be actionable. His regusing to pay unless you find a replacement, is illegal in many states. You should place in an e-mail, saving a copy of the e-mail in a mailbox that is not a company mailbox, that explains this and that you agreed to work for the period (and assist in looking for a replacement). And point out that in talking to potential replacements, that when speaking to them, you will only speak the truth of the working environment. And if it is an impossible environment, then your discussions will reflect that.

    Point out that his behavior indicates that he does not want you there now, and if he does not want you there, you would be happy to leave immediately.


  110. Plain and simple... by jwiegley · · Score: 0, Redundant
    I haven't bothered to read the other posts because I think the solution to your situation is simple:

    You don't want to burn any bridges. But you can't control other people and your boss has already burnt the bridge.

    Since there is no bridge left; simply leave. Tell him that because of his recent unreasonable behavior that you have decided not to complete working for the remaining time period that you agreed to under other circumstances. Your boss has solved your bridge issue for you.

    You are afraid of impending consequences as described by your boss (lack of being provided final pay). I think the legal system solves this problem for you...

    IANAL: Extortion is a threat given by another party to divest you of money or property unless some [undesirable] action is taken.
    If he theatened not to pay you your final check that is extortion. You already own that money since it is pay due for time you already worked (unless he pays you ahead of time; which I highly doubt). When he threatens you again to withold pay tell him that you, as of that moment, are suing him for extortion and that your lawyer will contact his. Thank him for providing you with the opportunity to own his company.

    He will back down, you will get your final check because he legal owes that to you. (If you agreed to work another two weeks and don't complete that period then of course he doesn't owe you the wages for the period you didn't work.)

    What you say? "He doesn't back down and you go to court." Let's see how that goes...

    • You: Your honor I'm suing my ex-employer for extortion because he threatened to withhold my money if I didn't continue to work for him.
    • Judge: Is this true?
    • Boss: I never said such a thing!
    • You: Then why haven't I been paid the money you owe me?
    • Judge: Have you paid him the money you owe him?
    • Boss: Umm.... no.
    • Judge: Why not?
    • Boss: Umm.... Because he won't work for me anymore?
    • Judge: I think we're done here.
    Legal problem solved because either he now works for you or the court orders him to pay you what he owes you (plus court expenses, probably).

    So simple:

    • He burned the bridge
    • He continues to add gasoline
    • He has attempted extortion.
    • He is crazy at times (by your definition)
    • You don't need any of that
    • You already have a replacement position.
    • Move on immediately.
    My guess is that your boss has always been this way (I doubt he all of the sudden turned into this person unless he's had a stroke recently.) I also would wager, that if you sat and thought about it a bit, you always knew this and didn't like it. So I'm surprised you remained for seven years. Again, I'd say good job for persevering; move on now.

    Side note: I often wonder why employees become attached emotionally to companies. Are we projecting some sort of parent/child dependency onto this non-personal relationship? The fact is that companies don't become attached to you; there is no reason for employees to become attached to the company. Become attached to your girlfriend (or boyfriend) and hobbies. Work is just something you do to make money to make the other things possible. It is possible to make your work and hobbies the same; but this is rather rare.

    --
    I will never live for sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine.
  111. Two things to keep in mind. by mindstrm · · Score: 1

    1) Unless required by law or contract, your two weeks notice are a professional courtesy. Don't forget that. You ARE being professional by giving two weeks when you don't need to.

    2) A wacko boss cannot necessarily do much harm to your career. Real business people tend to see petty complaints from ex employers for what they are. Employers aren't all part of some "Boss" club or anything like that.

  112. [NITPICK]Re:Solicitor's advice , not slashdot's! by OrangeSpyderMan · · Score: 1

    Strictly speaking, lawyers who are not barristers may be legal executives and not solicitors, if you see what I mean. All Lawyers who aren't barristers are not solicitors - though solicitors will try and tell you otherwise :-)

    From the ILEX site :
    "Legal Executives are qualified lawyers specialising in a particular area of law"

    --
    Try NetBSD... safe,straightforward,useful.
  113. Dont be afraid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I'm afraid I think this is bad advice."

    Don't be afraid to have thoughts or opinions.
    They don't mean that much to us, and could never cause harm.

    But if these thoughts are coming from voices in your head other than your own conscious thinking, perhaps you should be afraid. In that case, keep them to yourself and seek professional help immediately.

  114. Been there (almost) by ashridah · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I had the unfortunate position of being forced to call in the Victorian state level (Australia, btw) employee relations resolution mob when I was leaving a company a few years ago.

    My employer had withheld 4 weeks of pay, even though I was there AND WORKING for the entire month(!) of notice I gave (a month sounds crazy, never signing a contract like that again). They tried to claim they couldn't afford to pay me. i knew that was crap, although they had a history of not paying debtors, they did have assests they could sell, to people who were actually willing to buy them.

    Fortunately, in my case, using the state-based resolution system means I didn't have to pay anyone anything to get my money. After my ex-employer stuffed them around for 6 months, they finally drove over, had a chat, quietly offered to write them up for fines, and I got the cheque in the mail.

    It was a nice christmas present when it came. :)

    Now, all this said, particularly in the initial article poster's situation, it won't hurt him to stick it out. That gives him a much stronger position if he *DOES* get shafted.

    Also, i'd be inclined to not worry about doing work outside the job description during that time. They can't hold you to that, particularly if you've got other duties to attend to that you DO have to do.

    That said, DO NOT under any circumstances, badmouth your previous employer in any way at any time. That's just asking for trouble, and can come around and bite you in the butt really quick.

    ashridah

  115. My $.02 by a42 · · Score: 1

    If they actually do refuse to pay your final paycheck you will need to contact the labor board for the state you work in. Some states will pursue the action on your behalf (free of charge) including recovering lost pay AND damages. If you think your boss is serious about this I would suggest contacting the appropriate government agency NOW just to find out what the procedure is.

    My most important advice is this: C.Y.A. Document everything you do from here out. Get witnesses if you can. If at all possible don't check in any source code changes; give patches to someone else and let THEM do it.

    Last time I left a job the PHB's wanted me to keep developing right up until the last minute. I'm not talking bug fixes, here; they wanted me to continue doing new development on a project that couldn't possibly be completed in two weeks. It's possible that I was just being paranoid and all they were really trying to do was to suck every last drop out of me before I left. I took no chances; I did my bug fixes -- simple ones -- and handed off the new development to some other sorry sucker.

  116. a couple of simple issues: by mqx · · Score: 1


    1. if you leave before your contract allows you to, the employer can sue you: however bad the situation is, do not give your employer more ammunition.

    2. your employer cannot (legally) withhold your paycheck or force you to find a replacement, etc: the only way your employer can withhold funds is if you are holding onto company assets, or you owe the company money or somethign else.

    3. you need to remain civil, not just for your boss, but for everyone else around you: your reputation isn't held just by one person: the group consensus about who you are will reign supreme.

  117. Leaving a job isn't about you - talk to your boss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've given notice several times; and every time I have done the following:
    1. I hand deliver if possible a written and signed statement usually on a Friday afternoon and always face to face with my immediate supervisor unless they are far far away that I am planning to terminate my at-will employment with the company. In this statement I include when I plan my last day to be which is at least two weeks, but it could be three weeks or more if I am on a project nearing a critical point. At no point is my notice going to significantly exceed the amount of vacation time I have left.
    2. A verbal statement that I have enjoyed being here and I plan to work as hard if not harder during the time I have remaining IF THAT IS WHAT MY SUPERVISOR WANTS.
    3. A verbal request for my supervisor to tell me what he would like me to do in the time remaining.

    I assume the following when I walk in:
    1. I could be fired on the spot (never happened).
    2. I could be asked to leave for the remainder of my employment time (happened once then got rescinded).
    3. I could get a counter-offer to stay (happened twice).
    4. I could get asked to extend my notice time to start my new job later (saw it happen to someone once).

    But whatever the next step is, its your supervisor's to make. I would suggest you have a planning session with him to talk about what he would like you to do in the time remaining.

    You didn't bring it up as a possibility, but I offer it here. What do you say if you get asked "Would you stay for a counter offer?" Here it is.

    "I made a business decision to leave. It wasn't personal or emotional. If you would like me to look at making another business decision, I certainly would consider it."

  118. Keep it all business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally I don't like to burn bridges, even if the boss is nuts and unreasonable. The main thing is to keep the relationship business. Which is to say, tell your boss that the decision is not anything personal between you and him nor is it intended to hurt him or the business in anyway, but a personal career decision. I've found that refusing to be drawn in to a personal drama and reminding yourself that you are a professional and this situation is a business relationship while not being confrontational helps to diffuse the situation and may make your boss wake up to the fact he's being unreasonable. Volunteer to help out anyway you can within reason but don't go overboard and certainly don't feel guilty. As others have posted, it is not your responsibility to find a replacement and holding your last paycheck hostage probably violates the law.

  119. Get some evidence! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey what this guy did is ILLEGAL!!!!!! GET IT!
    It's not wrong, or bad, or insane, IT'S ILLEGAL TO THREATEN and INTIMIDATE in this way!!!!

    What this guy needs is evidence or a witness!

    My suggestion, lure the boss into a converstaion,
    get him heated up, get him to confirm that he
    was threatning to withhold your pay. The sneaky part -

    Do in such a way that he thinks you are alone but
    have someone else listening. Do that, and the boss
    is toast and you win a big bonus check!

    DO NOT LET PEOPLE GET AWAY WITH THIS THREATNING BEHAVIOR! Not a boss, not a peer, not a junior! If someone threatness to "sick the boss" on you - they are the ones threatning and it justifies a response. Don't let them get away with it. If you do, they will continue to do it! Think of this situation as an opportuniy to prevent someone else encountering the same kind of bad behavior.

    Stand up for what's right here and do everyone a favour!

    1. Re:Get some evidence! by shpoffo · · Score: 1

      hmmm.... my post was in total agreement with your comment. yes.

  120. You need an attorney by jim_deane · · Score: 4, Informative

    1. "Lawyer up". Seriously, go consult with an attorney, because...

    2. Withholding or threatening to withhold pay or benefits as you describe is very, very, very illegal, and so are...

    3. Libel and slander (printed and spoken, respectively).

    All based on my limited understanding of US law, but if you are not in the US there are still likely protections against what you have described.

    Get. Attorney. Now.

    Jim

    1. Re:You need an attorney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Got to disagree here. You do not need a lawyer. A lawyer will charge hundreds of dollars to do anything and most good ones will tell you what I will: you don't need a lawyer, just fill out a complaint form at city hall if he does not pay you.

      This will trigger a VERY scary letter that your state government will send him. Pretty much any employer short of a drug dealer pays up quick when they get that letter.

    2. Re:You need an attorney by khallow · · Score: 1

      He probably ought to see a lawyer about the slander/libel. Also, I can't help but think that if he doesn't cover his tail well, this soon to be ex-employer might find some way to harm him at the new job (eg, lawsuit over NDAs or the like).

    3. Re:You need an attorney by realkiwi · · Score: 1

      > but if you are not in the US

      This kind of thing _can't_ happen in most of Europe. And we get vacations. And companies that make a few billion in profit but not enough for Wall Street and who lay off workers are frowned apon (they lose lots of customers not just workers). But hey our system is fscked!

      --
      realkiwi
  121. waive your rights? by sakura+the+mc · · Score: 0

    nevada is a right-to-work state
    an employer can tell you to fuck off with no reason
    you can do the same to the employer.

  122. I quit cold; you can, too by T1girl · · Score: 1

    I live in a state in the U.S. where there is no right-to-work law. They make you sign a paper acknowledging that you can be fired any time for any reason. IT WORKS BOTH WAYS. The boss who hired most of my co-workers and me and championed our work died and was replaced by a weasel who stepped all over everyone and made our lives miserable. I found another job at a place where they needed me immediately, so I just went in, told him I was quitting that very day, stayed a few hours to get my files in order and left. Everyone except my boss came around to say good-bye and wish me well. The next day I started my new job and lived happily ever after. Several of my co-workers have quit or transferred to other departments since then, and even the payroll clerk who sent me my last paycheck attached a sticky note asking if I could help her find a new job.

    It's important to keep your escape plan very quiet, until you get your next job lined up. If this guy had treated us decently, I would have given the traditional two weeks' notice. But let's face it, your new loyalty is to your new company and their needs. My old employer was also very aggressive about trying to force us to give them leads on new employees, but what kind of friend would try to steer a friend to work for a hostile employer?

    Go on, quit now! Don't look back -- you're not going that way.

    1. Re:I quit cold; you can, too by 44BSD · · Score: 1

      A quick definition or two:

      "right-to-work" doesn't have anything to do with giving notice, or with some legally-required advance warning of impending dismissal. It simply means that employees cannot be required to join/be members of a union in order to work at a given place. It is the opposite of "closed shop", in other words.

      The term typically used to describe "we can fire you anytime, for any reason" and "you can quit whenever you want, for whatever reason" is 'employment at will'.

    2. Re:I quit cold; you can, too by Jerim · · Score: 1

      I agree with everything you said. Most employers only check out your last job, figuring that job checked out your last job and so on. Since you are already hired, just focus on making a good impression at your new job. That is all that matters now.

  123. Some legal help.... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Ok, first off, it's really odd sitting here reading this article right now, since I just went through a similar situation and have been out of work since earlier this week.

    (In my case, it appears that my boss intends to withhold my last paycheck until I return a database of his customers he claims I took from his office. The most obvious problem with this is I have no such database to return! In fact, as far as I was aware, he kept this stuff on his laptop computer, which wasn't even in the office the last few times I came in.)

    But anyway, this site may help you with the legalities of employers keeping your last paycheck:

    http://www.nolo.com/article.cfm/objectID/7D5D0C62- 9CB1-47F8-BA6C70E1318E65FE/111/259/188/ART/

    1. Re:Some legal help.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't need a lawyer if your boss withholds money you're owed. If he's this idiotic, you just go to your local police department and file a complaint. Non-payment of employee (employee mind you, not contractor) wages is a criminal offense, just like stealing.

  124. simple by tacocat · · Score: 1

    don't leave early. If he with holds your paycheck you can take him to court. Unless you signed an agreement upon hiring to find a replacement... which I doubt.

  125. Easy, except for the nutty boss. by mjensen · · Score: 1

    My former employer had many people leave for many circumstances.

    The best exit routes were where the employee gave 2-3 months notice, so things could be handled in a nice and calm way. Documentation could be changed, and responsibilities moved and managed.

    The worst were where the employee gave half-day notice, and there was nobody trained adequately to fill those responsibilities. Panic ensues. Worst was a CFO who quit.

    1. Re:Easy, except for the nutty boss. by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      How the hell can you plan 2-3 months ahead on what job you'll have?!?!?!

  126. Stay for as long as you said you would by Luscious868 · · Score: 1

    You should stay for as long as you said you would stay. If he does withhold your final paycheck for any reason, take him to court. You'll win, and he'll have to pay your legal fees.

  127. he cannot hold pay by psycobrat · · Score: 0

    it is against the law for him to with hold your pay and can land him in jail. even the threat of with holding pay is a felony. call him on it and remind him of the law as well as the conciquences of breaking it.

  128. you're already doing them a favor by v1 · · Score: 1

    ... by giving them any notice. Ask yourself, how much notice could you count on if they were going to let you go? I've found out first-hand on three separate occasions, that number is zero.

    Assuming you have a position of functional importance (and uniqueness even) in your company... if your boss had his wits about him, (and it doesn't look that way from your description) he would immediately pull someone from somewhere else for you to go on full-time training. You wouldn't be doing any of your normal work, which would give management a good view of what things you do now that nobody else knows how to do right, so they can squeeze this information from you before you depart. You should be spending the next 2 weeks answering questions and walking someone through doing your day-to-day work.

    Given that this is not happening, do not be surprised if the boss tries guilt, sense of duty, obligation, or fraud (withholding of pay) after you leave or are about to leave, in an attempt to get you to stay longer, answer phonecalls at all times of the day, night, or weekend, or just plain do free consulting for them. Dont' stand for it. If they want to be calling you and asking questions or have you come in 'for a few minutes" to show them how to do something, establish a firm rate, ($50/hr is a generous consulting rate) paid in advance. Don't let them take advantage of you.

    If you're thinking about cutting out early, at least try to weigh in your impact on the other employees... you probably know what life will be like for them for the next 2-4 weeks as things are trying to get settled back down. Don't let one manager ruin your day AND theirs. The manager might have it coming to him, but he'll just spread the grief around as most PHB's tend to do.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  129. there is no such thing like leaving in good terms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    your employer always will be mad at you cause you left period, and why the hell trying to work with him again, don't think about leaving if you are thinking in a possible return. Remember you are most likely to get humiliated if you return with your tail between your legs.

    Praise god you can leave and they are not kicking you. That's business, that loyalty you want to express is so 1950's give with the times.

  130. Leave as you orginally intended. by shmiller · · Score: 1

    Write him a written letter (keep a copy) telling him how much you've enjoyed your job there and the company. That you regret leaving the company but as he knows, we all should move forward and reach for new challeges and oportunities when the option is available. You're saddened by having to leave such a great company but excited to move forward. Leave as you orginally intended. If he is as you say, your situation is likely to get worse. Two weeks notice is fine. Steve M.A. Human Resources Developement

  131. Replacement Killers by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Won't someone think of the replacement? Just think of the bad karma you'd receive for fixing the replacement up for a term with psycho-boss! Imagine if the replacement was actually someone you knew or even a friend? Come to think of it, why can't they find at least a semi-suitable replacement in today's job market?

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    1. Re:Replacement Killers by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Oh well. Maybe he should just tell the boss, that he has found his replacement, in line with current industry "best practices".

      The replacement is a Mr S. Sethu in Mumbai, India. ;)

      --
  132. *Ahem* - you're on tape by Glonoinha · · Score: 3, Funny

    Actually I have found many, many times that a camera or a tape recorder (or digital audio recorder) is a wonderful peace-making device.

    Set the tape player on your desk out in the open and just leave it there. Next time someone comes in and says something totally nasty (ie, not paying the last paycheck, or bad-mouthing you, or whatever) just point to the recorder and say "that's on." It doesn't have to be on, but if you manage to time it right even better.

    Amazing piece of attitude adjustment, someone knowing that whatever they say or do is on tape.

    I once walked into the county court records office once and as the worker-bee walked up (I think I interrupted her game of Solitare on her computer, she didn't look happy) I popped a flash camera up and snapped off a picture. When she asked what that was all about, I explained that I was going to send her picture to the Mayor describing how helpful she had been. And she was very helpful, go figure.

    --
    Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    1. Re:*Ahem* - you're on tape by Myrthe · · Score: 1

      did you send her picture to the Mayor describing how helpful she had been?

    2. Re:*Ahem* - you're on tape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...no, just reader's wives.

    3. Re:*Ahem* - you're on tape by Beltendu · · Score: 1

      Heaven knows I'd LOVE to do that were I in that sort of situation. Thankfully, I work with and for a great bunch of people, and have no reason to believe they'd pull this sort of crap if I were to give notice (and they've always been great about other people who have left for other opportunities). However, to my real point .... What to do if company policy forbids recording devices of that nature (cameras, microphones, etc)? Or worse, it's actually illegal in your work place? (I work for a naval subcontractor, as you can imagine you can get slapped with espionage charges and what not if you even forget you had your record-capable mp3 player in your pocket). Manual documentation is always possible I suppose, but less useful as evidence since it's so easy to doctor, and you're sure as hell not going to get a belligerent manager to sign it proving he was being a dick ... :)

  133. What! We are all a bit nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your human! Your perception of the universe is
    imprecise! Therfore you do not have a "perfect"
    model of the Real Universe! So your a bit "nuts",
    cause your model of reality is a "bit" off!

    QED - Get over it!! Your still alive - enjoy it!

    1. Re:What! We are all a bit nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I'm allergic to nuts.

  134. A better option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you considered peeing on his desk chair?

  135. Leaving on good terms. by crustacean666 · · Score: 1

    Get video, audio and witnmesses for any exchange. Let boss be the sh*tbag.

  136. re: burning bridges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you don't need or expect the reference who cares if you burn bridges or not. Last I checked offices were fairly flammable as well.

  137. Do you really need to ask?!? by dynoman7 · · Score: 1

    1) Grow a pair.
    2) Don't play the game.
    3) LEAVE! (on the day you said you were going to leave...legally he has no choice but to pay you for what you worked)

    --
    Blarf.
  138. Oblig. Quote: by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1

    Crazy, huh? Now you're talking semantics. What if I told you crazy was working 50 hours a week for 50 years, at the end of which you're told to piss off. End up in a nursing home, hoping to die before suffering the indignity of not making it to the toilet on time. Wouldn't you say that is insane?


    Steve Buscemi, Con Air

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

  139. Why would you want to leave on good terms ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am not suggesting that you purposely leave on bad terms, or violate the Golden Rule (Do Unto Others as You Would Have Them Do Unto You).

    I recognize the personality that you describe as your boss. This type of person is very common among small businesses. They are very focused and self absorbed, and there is often no one there who can or will force them to step back and few the larger picture.

    As someone who already has another job lined up, it's your duty to politely, but firmly and without accepting any argument, point out the behaviour. Usually the best way to do it is in front of numerous other people, because private conversations may not be parsed for content at all, but just interpreted as resistence. Tell them (with a smile): "Sir, threatening to withhold money I have already earned is against your morals. You don't want to be so focused on your short-term annoyances that you do that, do you ?" "Sir, you are already known for being a bit nuts by all your aquaintances, your bad references can't hurt me unless you behave sanely for a few years." You've got to drive the message home because you are probably the only one in a position to do it.

    Your long-term reputation will be better if you are firm in this regard.

  140. You don't need an attorney to start the process by jyoull · · Score: 1

    If the company has any money at all, and you have any time at all, you can be paid and so on...

    1) If the check is due and does not come, you can write your own demand letter. Opinions and accusations are not needed. Just send a note saying that you need your final check by ___ (date) which should be maybe 1 to 2 weeks after the due date, if you want to be generous. Don't send it "certified" (that's expensive and unnecessary). Send it by Prioirity Mail ($3.89) and be sure to add "signature confirmation" to the delivery specs.

    2) If he doesn't pay:

    a) File in the local small claims court for the full amount expected plus the small claims filing fee, plus interest (won't be much but add it)

    b) Report the employer to whatever state agency regulates companies and employers. One such agency is always the Secretary of State, that handles the official-ness of business entities, but there is probably also a sort of board that regulates the conduct of businesses.

  141. Yeah, But Someone by reallocate · · Score: 1

    >> ...any contract that does violate the law is null and void.

    Yeah, but someone's got to pay court costs to sort it out. The employer will contend there's no violation. It'll take a lawsuit to get a ruling.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    1. Re:Yeah, But Someone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that's when it's labelled the equivalent of a SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Partnerships) lawsuit - basically, they're just getting into a p%ssing match and hoping to make it a "our deep pockets are deeper than yours" so you'll be reluctant to follow through because you'll perceive the risk, even if it's very unlikely, of a loss would outweigh the feeling of winning, regardless of the odds.

    2. Re:Yeah, But Someone by reallocate · · Score: 1

      But why rush to the most extreme and most costly last resort? The guy just wants to get his last paycheck. He should delay legal action until his boss does something that requires it.

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  142. Wow, what hypocrisy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's amazing that a corporation, one that will inform you at 9AM that you're being released and expect you out the door by 10AM, can turn around and demand you stay longer. Fuck em. I gave up paychecks to help some previous employers and received no gratitude whatsoever from them in return. You're a resource to them. If they slander you, sue them. Wear a wire (check with your state laws first) then bring the tapes to a good lawyer. Sue the bastards for three months salary plus court costs.

  143. How to Leave a Job on Good Terms? by SFWind · · Score: 1

    You are not obligated to do anything. Most companies these days use "at will" employment and while it is often missed it is a two way street and the employee can quit without giving prior notice.
    Withholding your final paycheck is plain illegal. They have to pay you in full, with accrued vacation days etc within a few days from your last day at work.

    Good luck,

    SFWind

  144. I don't think so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this guy felt threatened enough to come
    post here then I think a lot of us don't
    get it at all. How many of you have started
    a thread about this kind of situation on SlashDot!

    This guy needs evidence! Don't wait! Get the
    situation under control and get things going your
    way BEFORE you leave. Doing anything about this
    later just gets more and more difficult.

    Getting some physical evidence or a witness to
    this kind of behavior will make all the
    difference! Anyone can make an accusation. Get
    someone to overhear the threats. Then your boss
    won't be giving references period. His boss will,
    and it will be something like.

    "This employee showed one kind of behaviour we
    greatly appreciate. He helped us resolve a
    difficult situation using courage and insight!"

    You think your bosses boss want's lawsuits and
    illegal activity of this sort going on? That
    could wreck the business and damage all of the employees.

    Do the right thing here!

    1. Re:I don't think so by Courageous · · Score: 1

      Actually, he might consider writing everything down, each and every time his boss says something. It's admissible in court, and has higher value than verbal testimony. But don't take my word for it, talk to an attorney...

      C//

  145. Always? by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    we had illegal immigrants apply for work with us, with some damn fine fake work documents.

    our employee leasing company however, is very anal, and informed us within 12 days of hire that they were not legitimate authorizations..

    they were not paid.

    they were told, before punching in, that if the documents had any issue, they would not be paid.

    the hours are logged with the employee leasing company, and the (ex)employees have been invited to pick up their paycheck any time they can provide valid work authorization that covers the dates in question..

    illegal on our part? I don't think so, we paid the leasing company, and they paid quarterly taxes.. the payment to the individuals is still sitting on the bottom of our payroll statement each month...

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:Always? by taustin · · Score: 1

      In fact, it is illegal. Unlikely to be prosecuted, since the victims are illegals, but illegal just the same.

      You work for criminals.

      You seem comfortable with that.

    2. Re:Always? by jmv · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not sure it's actually illegal (though it may be) because in some way, the employee is commiting fraud. If I get hired pretending to be a lawyer and I'm not, I don't think I can expect to be paid for the time it took my employer to figure out.

  146. Leave in legal terms. by johnnnyboy · · Score: 1

    I simpathize with you, I too had a bad boss, but his behavior is very disturbing.

    However, despite this please don't just leave and jet early because you'll still need his good reference. 6-7 years of hard work and I'm shocked that he doesn't show you any respect. It's normal for employees to leave and that's the risk employers must take. Also any good manager will always cross-train employees, so your work still continues. If he hasn't done this then this is his fault.

    Goodluck.

    --
    "If a show of teeth is not enough, bite ... but bite hard!"
  147. fight by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    I was the director of I.T. for a medium size retail concern. I had finally grown tired of the company president overruling my decisions, even when my decisions concurred with that of the company controller. The SOB tried to withhold pay, I told him that state law was on my side and would he like to dance? I got the pay. But that son of a bitch lived next door to the Speaker of the House. My new job was a state job and so when transition time came guess who was out of a job. Payback will be a mother, I assure you. I'm just biding my time. BTW, the son of a bitch is named David Resnik. If you ever run across the man, either run or smack the shit out of him.

  148. Notice by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I find it hard to believe that this guy would treat someone who's leaving an IT job this way. I have found more than one manager who preferred to pay me for the two weeks and hustle me out the door when I give them notice than so they can secure their networks against me, which is something that I consider a wise move.

    Not to say that you should sully yourself and your reputation with backdoor hacks and retribution, but it's a dumb manager that leaves you in a position to do so then provides incentive to do so by acting like a jerk. Your boss needs to be hit with a clue stick... there aren't too many ppl that can fuck up a business like an IT guy with inside knowledge and a chip on his shoulder.

    --
    -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    1. Re:Notice by alienw · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, like you won't be the first suspect in any subsequent investigation. You could get several years in jail if you fuck up their network. Don't do it.

    2. Re:Notice by saltydogdesign · · Score: 1

      Agreed. The boss shouldn't stop being a dick because he's afraid of retribution... he should stop because being a dick is a dick thing to do.

      --
      // This is not a sig.
    3. Re:Notice by Frobnicator · · Score: 1
      That's generally a great security policy. It's SOP for many government offices.

      What the guy REALLY ought to do is call the Business Software Alliance on them.

      And if he doesn't think they have enough bad licenses, he could find a way to 'misplace' several licenses. Not necessarily steal them, but just maybe push a bunch of papers behind some file cabinets, that just HAPPEN to include some Microsoft licenses.

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    4. Re:Notice by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      Nevertheless, you do see my point... as a manager, it's irresponsible to leave someone in such a position and provoke them...

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    5. Re:Notice by boinger · · Score: 1
      If you give notice, doesn't that presuppose that you had time to *consider* giving notice and, thus, had all the opportunity in the world to do whatever you wanted to their network?

      Not to say I haven't worked for a company that had similar policies to the one(s) who hustled you out the door.

      Not all companies are so shortsighted, however, much to their credit. I worked for a big bank for a couple years and I knew I was in a position where my leaving could have *significant* negative impact, and I gave them the courtesy of 6 weeks notice so I could exit as gracefully as I could...I was working late on my last day, too, because I needed to, and they deserved my loyalty (they really were great to work for - my move was primarily geographic, so I wasn't leaving out of spite for them by any means).

      --
      Send your friends messages of love at fuck-you.org
    6. Re:Notice by Facekhan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I called the BSA on a job after they refused to pay my last check. Not sure what happened but considering one of my last tasks had been an internal software audit I had more than enough evidence to satisfy the BSA guys when they got back to me about it. They basically pirated everything at that place.

    7. Re:Notice by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      If you give notice, doesn't that presuppose that you had time to *consider* giving notice and, thus, had all the opportunity in the world to do whatever you wanted to their network?

      That's always been my take on this, I just don't see the gain in escorting people off the site when they hand in their notice. If the get the sack or made redundant, then fair enough. Surely the chance to do some handover work outweighs the completely negligable chance of a person parting on good terms being a (unprepared) bastard? Someone that is ...eeeevil... will do their nasties before reaching that point.

    8. Re:Notice by Sierpinski · · Score: 1

      Just calculate how much one paycheck is worth in terms of staples, post-its and paper clips. I don't think many grocery stores accept payment in the form of thumbtacks and tape, but you never know. Maybe they're low in stock and would be happy to accept your new "currency".

    9. Re:Notice by 80sCartoons.net · · Score: 1

      A company I used to work for made the mistake of not escorting the IT personnel out the door when they were laid off. They were given two weeks notice. Someone ended up causing real damage through sabotage of a critical system as they were leaving. Whie it wasn't possible to conclusively prove who it was (so we heard), we all knew pretty much which one was to blame. :/ That said, they're taking a big risk by treating him like this when he's already given notice. There are employees out there who are both capable of sabotage and willing, given enough provocation. While most of us are professional and ethical, there are those few that aren't.

    10. Re:Notice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I once had an employee leave from a government service job where I was the SA. I had to sit in a room with "The Fed" (spot the Fed is easy in such a case). Dude had reformatted his drive (Win3.11) before leaving the job. He had violated written policy about saving data to the network for storage and backup.

      I learned that even $400 of suspected loss through misuse of data networks will trigger the "FBI felony investigation" algorithm. I most certainly wouldn't want Agent Smith coming to my door (assiming you own and like the door you have).

      That's why I prefer to be supervised as I delete my own account prior to my last day. I want everyone to know, "whatever happens after I surrender root, it wasn't me. Go look at Jones over there, he's a shifty bugger."

    11. Re:Notice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh come now.

      Deliberately sabotaging the employer's network is what gets a person in trouble. You are right, he should not do that. On the other hand, innocent little honest mistakes and configuration errors that don't result in immediate damage...

      Heck, pobody's nerfect!

  149. Bullshit by Zone-MR · · Score: 1

    A solicitor is the last person you ask for advice. A solicitor will give you whatever 'advice' you need to hear to take the matter further, via the legal system, and pay them hefty consultation fees.

    Slashdot is a good place to start. You will hear from people who may have been in a similar situation in the past. The average Slashdotter will give you an honest opinion as they have nothing to gain or lose from it. A solicitor will NOT tell you "the last thing you want is a court battle if you can resolve things peacefully".

    1. Re:Bullshit by khallow · · Score: 1
      A solicitor is the last person you ask for advice. A solicitor will give you whatever 'advice' you need to hear to take the matter further, via the legal system, and pay them hefty consultation fees.

      It's likely that the original poster is mature enough to talk to a solicitor. And he probably can figure out the difference between what the solicitor wants and what he wants.

  150. money vs. burned bridges by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the additional info, I hadn't considered it.

    However, the thread-starting poster seems more interested in preserving his reputation than in maximizing money in the short term.

    If he can afford it, and absent disparagement he'd be able to get another job soon, it may be worth it to give up money in exchange for giving up headaches.

    It's a call only he can make.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  151. Don't accept the proposition by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

    If he says he's not going to pay you unless you find him a replacement, don't keep working under those conditions. Simply not paying you will not be enough to satisfy his desire for revenge. If he does somthing like that to you, he'll need to justify his action to himself and others. In other words, he will be motivated to ruin your reputation. Either he takes back the threat or you walk immediatly.

    Be firm, but don't be threatening. Let him know that you're committed to make the transition as easy as possible for him and to fufil your fair responsibilities, but make sure he understands that the choice and the power is his.

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  152. Don't put up with an Abusive Boss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    15 years after quitting a job where I worked for an abusive boss I still have nightmares about him.

    It was a small business - just him, me and the secretary. There was no HR department!

    His business is not worth sacrificing your sanity or your dignity.

    Australian ABC TV recently screened a report on workplace Psychopaths: See; http://www.abc.net.au/catalyst/

  153. Re:My two cents... (A Bosses Point of View) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    You do not have a legal obligation, and he can not withold your final paycheck for any hours you actually worked-- that is against the law. And there is no excuse for his behaviour and lack of professionalism.

    That said, you say this is a small development company. I do not know how critical you were to the operation or what mutual expectations you may have created. Looks like you were interacting with the clients.

    This is not specific to you, but in general for anyone who works for a small development company for a long time.

    At some time in the past, you started looking for a job. At some time prior to that you must have thrown a mental switch that you were going to start looking for a new job. At some time even prior to that, something about your work ceased to be rewarding. I am sure all of this did not happen overnight. You did stay there for 6 or 7 years. That is a long time in the software development business. Given your boss's reaction, you are likely a key member of the team. Did you catch your company and your customers by surprise when you announced you were leaving ? Did you discuss the events that were causing you to be unsatisfied when you threw the mental switch? Yes, your employment is likely at-will and your boss could have terminated your employment without much notice too -- but after 6 or 7 years at a small company, as a boss I would normally appreciate a transition time, specially when an employee is interacting with customers.

    Heck, this is a very incestous business with lots of M&A activity and paths do cross again and again so it is just good advice to show professionalism all around. You may run into your customer contacts again.

    Looks like you did offer to stay some extra time after you told the boss you were leaving. At this stage the environment seems fairly poisoned, so you should confront him about his behaviour and insist that you would to leave immediately if it does not improve. The couple of weeks of salary isnt going to mean much, and given the environment you would have no motivation to give your 100%.

  154. The terrible twos by mactov · · Score: 1

    It's a LOT harder for employers to screw you over when you know your rights AND take steps to see that they are enforced.

    Agreed. Keep your word, keep records, keep your nose clean, and remember this is an adult having a public temper tantrum. If the tantrum escalates into actually doing you harm, calmly announce that you would hate to be forced to call the labor board or an attorney.

    On some level, he knows he's being a jerk and making a fool of himself. If you meet that with a calm, pleasant, firm demeanor, he'll know that he may be acting like a two-year-old, but he's messing with an adult, so he can't get away with much.

    And no need for you to do his job. You're not going to be around to live with your replacement, he is. It's to his benefit to do the finding.

    --
    OK, now what?
  155. Two Weeks Notice by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

    Two weeks notice is the "industry standard" but is not required. Legally, you can quit any time without notice (if you live in an at-will employment state, which I believe most of not all are). By the same token, if you give notice that you intend to quit, your boss has the right to fire you immediately (but still has to pay any back pay he owes you and/or unused vacation time). If he DOESNT fire you, he certainly has to pay you for your time. And forcing you to find a replacement is just silly - you are under no obligation to do so!

  156. Go over his head by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go over his head to confront this, if you don't get satisfaction hire a lawyer. You don't want to find out five years from now, through tips and hints, and smug comments from stupid leering jackasses that you ''lost'' your job for stealing and surfing porn during work.

    Take this seriously - if he's rude to your face he might be ten times worse behind your back. Character assassination is a real possibility that people don't consider until they see it with their own eyes. And problems like these won't go away unless you defend yourself. Predators can sense a person who doesn't defend themselves.

  157. Wow, reality mimicking fiction by hvacigar · · Score: 1

    This is like something directly out of Jennifer Government, the book by Max Barry.

  158. Talk to HR... by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    ...and then just go. Submit a letter to HR (not the boss) in writing that you quit effective immediately which mentions when you gave notice. Keep a record of your time card.

    If he screws your for all or part of it (which remains to be seen) call a lawyer.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  159. Replacement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since when is it your job to find your own replacement? If you gave two weeks notice then he has nothing to bitch about. He sounds like an idiot, probably one of the reasons for getting a new job, remember that.

  160. The myth of the 2-week notice by pvera · · Score: 2, Informative

    INAL but:

    1. Your employer is *not* entitled to advance notice of your departure (unless this is spelled out in a contract).
    2. You are *not* entitled to advance notice of your firing (unless this would mean the employer is in violation of a labor law).

    That's it, just two exceptions. If your contract does not specify a notice period, and a penalty for not doing so, you are clean. If your state laws don't force them to, your employers can wait until the very last second to tell you that you are fired or laid off.

    The 2-week notice is a common courtesy, less than two weeks is too drastic and will hint at a less than friendly departure. More than two weeks will make the whole thing akward.

    It is not your responsibility to find your replacement before you leave. The only thing you really owe them is a resignation letter so they can CYA. Give them thanks for the X years of great employment and for the camaraderie or whatever.

    We all know it is all a lie, but you are trying to leave in good terms and that letter will stick around for a while. Next time somebody calls HR to verify your employment, you'll get lucky and the person that answers the call won't know you. She'll pull your file and read the letter and won't hesitate to tell them that sure, you worked X years there but moved on because of whatever. If there is no letter she'll ask around and eventually she'll make it to your boss, who may or not be bitter about it. You fill the blanks.

    --
    Pedro
    ----
    The Insomniac Coder
    1. Re:The myth of the 2-week notice by dheltzel · · Score: 1
      More than two weeks will make the whole thing akward.

      In this case, I would agree, but that is not a general rule, even in this field. Every time I've changed positions (going back at least 15 years) I've left on the best of terms, always with at least 4 weeks notice. Several times I have actually interleaved my work days between the 2 companies to make the transfer of knowledge as seemless as possible. It was easy to negotiate this with my new employer because they realized then the sort of employee they were getting (often the new position had some "ramp up" time anyway).

      Giving an extra effort even when you might not get a visible, immediate payback will always help more than it costs you. Call it "karma", good will, or "the Golden Rule", but being nice has it's rewards. The last job I left, gave me a 3 month consulting retainer in case they needed me (and they did, one time) and left my company-paid ISDN private connection in place during that time "just in case". All accounts and passwords were also left in place (including root access to all production systems) to faciliate my access to my former employer's systems because they trusted me. Both parties benefited from this arrangement and I left feeling like I had given my best to the company, both during and after my employement.

  161. The latter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just leave.

  162. Johnny Paycheck Baby! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    I had a new PHB who demanded I do my job his way or take the highway at the end of a Friday. The following Monday I turned in my 15-day notice since my project was going to end at that time. He left me alone during those two weeks to finish the project and always smiled when he saw me in the hallway. I left the company after being there for six years, and I was the third one of a dozen senior people to leave.

    Another co-worker had a similar situation that I had. He lined up another job and decided to get himself fired. So he left his project materials out every night instead of locking them up. It took the PHB a week to notice that the security rules were being blantently violated and everyone (including other PHBs) knew it. So the co-worker got fired at the PHB's expense.

  163. Like any companies... by jromz03 · · Score: 1

    Like you said, don't burn bridges. That means that YOU'RE the one who don't burn it. If your boss decides to do it then its his/her problem.

    I'm sure you can easily find a suitable replacement, do a proper turn over, etc. In short, take it like a man for a little longer and do the honorable thing.

    Let him/her get personal while you remain objective.

    At least if he/she still decides to fuck you completely, at least you showed compassion and stayed professional.

    Hopefully you'd be able to find a more suitable work for you. Good luck!

  164. Go with grace by dptalia · · Score: 1

    First off, are you in a right to work state? If so, you can leave if you want. Otherwise, you're stuck keeping to your official notice.

    Having been in similar situations (far too often I'm afraid) I would recomend being the mature adult. Show everyone by your actions that you are a responsible person who others watching the situation may wish to employ in the future. Sure, your current boss never will, but who know which one of the silent watchers might remember you later.

    All that being said, if your boss does withold your final paycheck you can talk to a labor lawyer, or just your state labor board - the one time I did this I had the president of the company calling to make things right! Mention his irrational behavior to the head of HR, if he knows his business he'll have kitten-fits over what is going on and fix it very quickly.

    --
    Genius is one percent inspiration and 99 percent perspiration, which is why engineers sometimes smell really bad.
  165. Send HIM away. by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

    Anonomus call to homeland security, best part is you don't need any evidence and you will never see him again.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  166. Illegalities... by ibm1130 · · Score: 1

    Withholding a paycheck could get yer boss in dutch
    with the state labo(u)r department. You perhaps
    ought to remind him of this.
    And absent any goodwill you might still feel toward
    the firm you owe him nothing. Less than nothing given
    his behavio(u)r.

  167. walk out by timmarhy · · Score: 1

    next time he bad mouths you just say "i'm not taking shti from a nut case like you" and walk out on him. make sure you have recieved your pay up to that moment. the bridge is in ashes already, you may as well strike back

    --
    If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
  168. My take.... by Cloud+K · · Score: 1

    I'm normally all for leaving on good terms, so as not to burn bridges.

    But fuck it - from what you said, he's an absolute arsehole.

    I'm not sure how your legislation is, but in the UK generally the employee has a *lot* of rights and the employer has very few. So my thoughts are as follows...

    Wait out the absolute bare minimum notice, if the new company wants to take you ASAP.
    Don't be nasty or disruptive in case it gives him an excuse for dismissal.
    If he tries to withhold your paycheque for not finding a replacement, as someone said, remind him that it's his responsibility to do so and not yours. If it's not in your job description, tell him that too. And do all this via a tribunal - to hell with being nice, he wouldn't hesitate to be nasty.
    Work to the letter. If you get asked to do something that isn't in your job description, or something that might need training you haven't received, then refuse to do it.
    Once you're in the next job, forget about it. You might be tempted to slag him off in the papers, but you don't want your new employer trying to get rid of you in fear that you'll do the same to him.

    Good luck!

  169. Actually in your case by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    as well as mine, there is not much you can do. Two of my last jobs had managers and coworkers that were nuts, evil, or a combination of both. One was a law firm, and the other was a small medical instrument company. I haven't worked since 2002, but when they fired me, they did me a favor. Why? Because I do not have to put up with their mental, physical, psychological, emotional, and sometimes sexual abuse. I also am not able to see favoritism being played on the certain employees who are 20% of the company, but cause 80% of the problems. I mean they get rewarded for messing up by promotions and payraises, while they blame everyone else for their mistakes.

    He already burnt the bridge. All you can do is claim otherwise if a potential employer calls him for a reference. Never speak negative about a company or maanager because it looks unprofessional. Hopefully the potential employer will see how unprofessional your former boss is acting and understand why you left the company.

    Success is the best revenge, move on, move up, and don't let it affect your new job. Be successful, and try not to let it bother you. Unless the next company you work for is as bad or worse than the last, which it just might be, like in my case.

    I continue to look for a positive and supporting environment for my employment. I do not think such a place exists yet, maybe later.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  170. Slander by Kenrod · · Score: 1


    he has since starting making accusations of conspiracy, deceit, and has otherwise attempted to make me look bad in front of employees and long-time clients.

    This is slander and could damage your professional reputation and your opportunity to get work in the future (aren't you going to have to list this job on your resume?). I suggest you hire a lawyer to draft a letter and remind this prick that his bad behavior is not acceptable. And by all means stick around for the apology.

    --
    Good heavens Miss Sakamoto - you're beautiful!
  171. Office Space teachings by Unixinvid · · Score: 1

    I say watch a good movie like office space and learn the important values of screwing the boss over for his lack of compassion for his employess. I know from experience that bosses can sometimes half witted and tend not to tell you in the last minute what's going especially with major projects that are due in 3 days notice.

  172. You might want to gently point out to him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that by behaving in this manner with you in front of the other employees, he's just ensuring that the next time someone quits, HE won't give notice.

    Well, maybe not. But that's what will happen.

  173. You need to do two things by rfc1394 · · Score: 1
    1. Demand he give you a letter of recomendation as soon as you get back to work in view of your good record in having worked there, or you will walk out the door immediately instead of at the end of your notice period. And be willing to do so if he won't; then you will know one way or the other.

    2. Inform him - after you get your recommendation or he refuses - that if he attempts to withhold any salary of yours that is due, you will file a complaint with the state labor commission and you will sue if you need to. In most states, withholding a paycheck can be a crime, and in fact some states allow for court costs and attorney's fees plus triple damages, on the same as if someone fails to cover a bad check.

    --
    The lessons of history teach us - if they teach us anything - that nobody learns the lessons that history teaches us.
  174. Ignore his behaviour by syousef · · Score: 1

    Ignore this manager's behaviour. Be completely gracious and generous and let all your co-workers know just how much you've enjoyed working with them. This will undermine any accusations your boss is making.

    Do not find a replacement for yourself unless that was part of your contract.

    If your boss tries to withhold your paycheque, threaten and if necessary carry through with legal action.

    Make sure everything you do until you leave is by the book so they can't hold anything against you.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  175. No, man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...just cut your losses and work for the ass for a couple or few more weeks. Try to make it a point to get things straight before you leave. This will grant you more serenity of mind. You will get more respect from everyone involved and feel better about it if you're able to brush that kind of bullshit off. Work weekends/nights if you're able, to try and train the "n00b."

  176. You need help by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1
    I don't like to burn bridges, but I'm pretty sure he's already burned it to the ground, even threatening to withhold my final paycheck if I don't find a replacement before I leave.

    You should immediately talk with the employment board in your state's governement (if you're in the US). Your manager may have crossed over the line of what he can legally do.

  177. Can't withhold last paycheck by imnoteddy · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Simply point out to this idiot that if they withhold your last paycheck that you will go to a lawyer who is an expert on employment law in your state who will love to take on your case and totally ream the company for potentially a hundred times as much money as your last paycheck.

    Unless you signed an employment agreement that requires you to find your replacement (which you probably didn't and which wouldn't stand up in court anyway) they don't have a leg to stand on.

    --
    No electrons were harmed creating this post, though some may have been subjected to electrical and/or magnetic fields.
  178. Is his name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, is his name Ed Coughlin?

  179. Do check your state law by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 2, Informative

    Washington, for example, allows employees to collect double damages against employers who deliberately withhold wages.

  180. Rationality by Justice8096 · · Score: 1

    I have at times worked for bosses on medication (literally). Emotionalism is not the way to handle the situation. Calmness usually helps the person that has lost control regain it.
    The way you have phrased your question makes it seem that before your boss lost it you did not dislike your job, or the company. The way I would handle it is to say the following to your boss: "Look - I enjoyed working for you in the past, that is why I stayed as long as I did. I do not want you to fail, and I would surely recommend this job to someone who was as junior as I when I started here. But I can not do that without your help. As it stands, your statements undermine any aid I can offer - any candidate I send would immediately be distrusted because of the things you have told me to the people who have to work with my replacement. I may not be able to get someone before I leave - but in the past you were a good boss, and I would like to be able to recommend you as such, despite our current situation. Can I count on your help, in the name of our past?"
    Depending on the demeanor of your boss, this will be perceived as either a veiled (and effective) threat, or that you are a really good guy who cares. Or that you are a sucker ripe for betrayal (which means that he won't be clever and spin-doctor his betrayal of your trust). Either is useful.

  181. Stick it out. by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Just because your now thankfully soon to be ex-boss is an unprofessional jerkoff, doesn't mean you need to sink to his level.

    I got forced to resign under threats of BS lawsuits (which I couldn't afford to fight) by a guy who was pushing me out specifically because I told him, when asked, that I believed our company problems stemmed from bad marketing tactics.

    Since he was in charge, and since his son was head of marketing, I pretty much figured what the outcome was going to be, even saying it as politely as I could. But he went seriously overboard, and really screwed me, when it wouldn't have cost him anything to act like a professional instead of a child.

    Even so, I told him I'd enjoyed working for his company, dealt professionally with the last few of my responsibilities and cut my losses. I did this to a degree that he's been trying to hire me freelance for the last two years, even after that company went Chapter 13.

    I say "trying" because I'm professional, not stupid.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  182. This boss just screwed himself by DSP_Geek · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I was working at a smallish outfit a few years ago when someone recommended me to a VoIP startup. The position came with enough stock options to choke a horse and a nice bump in pay, so I took the gig on the condition I could finish my current project at the original company. They accepted, I did, and when I resigned from Company A the boss told me I was welcome to return any time. The guy didn't take it personally at all, so the whole thing was quite civilised.

    Well, the startup did what startups tend to do, and once the paycheques stopped I phoned up my former employer. It turned out he had a great pile of pending projects which needed an experienced DSP engineer, and here comes this ghost from the past who also happens to be familiar with the code base. It took us somewhat less than a minute to reach an agreement.

    If he had freaked out and pulled the above crap, I would've never called him up again even if I were so poor I had to eat cat food, but because the guy was a consummate professional we're both ahead of the game.

    Francois.

    1. Re:This boss just screwed himself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cat food is expensive!

  183. Hey Baxter, get in here! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I used to work at a magazine. Our editor in chief would call the entire staff into a conference room and harangue us for up to four hours because he found a typo in an article (before it was printed). One typo could cause him to say that we were "worthless," "useless," "unprofessional.."

    What an ass.


    "What an ass" is a sentence fragment, not a sentence, you worthless, useless, unprofessional hack! It's no wonder that you couldn't cut it as a journalist.

    -Lou The Editor

    1. Re:Hey Baxter, get in here! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try

      "What an ass [he is]."

  184. What references? by coyote-san · · Score: 1

    References, what are they?

    I'm serious. Any competent HR department will insist that nothing more than job title and period of employment be discussed. Even a "positive" reference can bite them in the ass.

    Going directly to a manager or coworker is equally useless. Nobody will use a reference who will slam them.

    Finally the culture makes it nearly impossible to check references anyway. Check a reference and you've broadcast that the person is considering another job. That can put the candidate in a difficult position if the job falls through.

    P.S., it's time worked AND accrued vacation time.

    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
    1. Re:What references? by bluGill · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ahh, but if you don't work those last two weeks they can easily document that walked off the job. They can then give you a bad reference, and they will win in court if you try to sue. (at least in my area two weeks is considered normal notice) HR would prefer not, but in this case you leave them with little choice, since they do not have opportunity to do any transitioning.

      In fact for most companies this is about the only way to get fired without being turned over to the police. If they want you gone they will give you the opportunity to "resign for personal reasons", at which point they don't give a bad reference (which means they give the dates you work and that you left on good terms, like any other employee) Because you resign (and if you are smart you will because if they have to fire you they will give a bad reference) you have less legal power against them. Of course if you they catch you doing something illegal they will fire you and then turn you over to the police.

      Mind many HR departments will send a guard to escort you to the door when you give your two weeks. However they still pay your for those two weeks, they just call it work from home.

      However you can get co-worker references. HR only controls what your boss can say. If bob worked with you and things you are a great guy, he can say that. If you resign all bob knows is one day you are gone. It is really easy to make bob think (without telling a lie) that your leaving was a hushed thing that you could not tell them about until after you were gone. He will then be a good reference. If you are fired he will find out, and hesitate to give a good reference figuring there is something he didn't know.

      In short: company references mean little (though you should check them anyway because a few people will lie about jobs they never had). However personal references are still checked.

    2. Re:What references? by artemis67 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I worked for a VERY large drug store chain back in the late 80's... they lost a very imporatant lawsuit regarding references. Basically, this woman left on bad terms, and was having trouble finding a new job because every time the interviewer called her former store manager to verify her employment, the store manager would tell the interviewer what a terrible employee she was. She sued the drug store chain, and won big. The ruling that came down was that the employers on your resume can only verify the dates of your employment, nothing more. No comments about the type of employee you are, good or bad.

      That being said, I'm sure that virtually all small business owners are ignorant of the ruling. So, it would be better in the article submitter's case to be without fault and not give his soon-to-be former employer any reason to badmouth him.

    3. Re:What references? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen a small business give this reason about an employee that did some prety terrible stuff (such as defraud their clients into paying for "expenses"). The response of the company calling about her, "We could take that a lot of different ways."

      In short, "I can only verify the dates of her employment." Has become business speak for "Do not employ this person."

    4. Re:What references? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      No we aren't.

      And when we check references, if we get a "no comment" or a "we will only verify employment" we take that to mean a negative assessment.

    5. Re:What references? by bluGill · · Score: 1

      For small companies perhaps. Big companies have a policy that all questions must be forwarded to HR who only gives dates of employment no matter how good/bad the guy was. They will fire any manager who gives any other reference, presumably to avoid the situations described above.

      So that policy will miss out on some very good people who worked for a large company.

    6. Re:What references? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did she *PROVE* legally that the store chain manager was badmouthing her?? That's what I need to know--maybe it is worth a separate ask-slashdot article.

      Me, I have been having a suspiciously hard time finding even low-level work in the two years since my last job downsized me, supposedly on good terms. But I have had no opportunity to find out what people are saying--that boss was a notoriously two-faced smiley-religious kind of guy; nobody knew what he was saying behind their backs...

      How does a person find out these things?

    7. Re:What references? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      How does a person find out these things?

      Get a third party to check your references (a friend will do) and tell you what they said. It's probably fine to make up a fake company name, but the fewer details, the better.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  185. Advice by OverflowingBitBucket · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Here's my advice. Take what you will. I've been somewhere similar once. I didn't follow this advice entirely, but if I had to do it again, I would. Hopefully you can learn from my mistakes.

    Do the time from your notice there. You aren't obligated to find a replacement, but tell your boss that you're happy to spend your remaining time looking for one and training one up if you find one. Be polite, even though the prick doesn't deserve it. Do not let yourself be intimidated. Let him dig his grave in front of the other employees. Politely disagree or ask for clarification when you are attacked or discredited. Do not work one extra minute beyond what notice you've given, do not work one extra minute overtime. You owe your boss nothing due to those threats. But make sure that any potential future employer can look back and see that you delivered 100% on what you owed, and that the employer was the one who fell short. You need to be 100% in the right because your employer will trash you when a future employer calls up to confirm your employment there. You need to show you did nothing wrong.

    Expect nothing in return. You probably won't get the pay. Move to your next job and concentrate on that. If your pay doesn't show, consult a lawyer, and write a polite but firm letter stating exactly what you are owed, with a due date, sent by registered mail. Take your time, discuss things in writing only. If he calls by phone (likely) and offers anything, ask for confirmation in writing (unless it is money, in which case ask when it will arrive). Don't let yourself be intimidated. If they won't play ball, after you're settled and have a steady income, then weigh up legal action. Do not fight this without a stable income behind you, it will be one of the most miserable experiences in your life. I've been there. Get a position of strength whilst attempting to be "reasonable", and if you feel it important to crush the prick afterwards, do so. Don't go light on them because they "might" give you a bad reference. Think about what they are going to do if you let them off. If they'll trash you anyway, you've got nothing to lose, assuming you can show you've been reasonable through the whole process.

    I could go on, but you've probably got the gist.

  186. I can't even imagine by MikeDawg · · Score: 1

    I can't even imagine working for someone like this for 6-7 months, let alone 6-7 years. How could you possibly put up with this guy for this long, and not realize it was a bad place to be in. Or did you realize this, and weigh out (salary vs phb'ness; with salary winning) the consequences. I have to believe that at some time after getting hired into the position you're at now you would have realized how your boss is, and made moves to get out of the company.

    If you did the mental battle of salary vs crazy boss, you had to realize that your resignation would end like this, right?

    I like to consider myself a hard worker, and a loyal employee, but I have a really hard time dealing with a boss like this, why did you stick around this long?

    --

    YOU'RE WINNER !
    Another lame blog

  187. Don't assume incompetence by coyote-san · · Score: 1

    It's a given that any HR department knows the local law. If you're processed through HR I would bounce a missing final paycheck straight to state. If they're acting in bad faith that bridge is long gone so there's no point in keeping the gloves on.

    If the boss handles the paperwork but there's a separate HR department, as you walk out the door "remember" that you needed to talk to the HR department about something. "Verify" the refusal to issue a final paycheck. Either you have the situation mentioned above or see interesting faces as they hastily provide that check. In the latter case it would be a good time to review their reference policy, although it might be a moot point if HR decides they've had enough.

    If there's no HR department, a discrete reminder might be useful since it's possible that they're simply ignorant of the law. This is especially possible if it's a small company with low turnover, something that seems to be the case here.

    Again you'll have your answer within hours. If it's genuine ignorance you'll get your check immediately. No "we'll mail it to you" since it's far too easy for a bad player to manipulate that situation. If they don't provide a check you're back to assuming bad faith and should bounce it immediately to the state.

    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
  188. You've got limited options... by ashbert · · Score: 1

    I normally don't post, but having some experience in this matter, I have to strongly agree here. If you leave any evidence behind of negative experiences, gripes, or aggravations, people will suspect your reasons for leaving are different no matter how untrue.

    Isolating and distancing yourself from your coworkers or griping about the workplace is the worst thing you can do to your reputation at this point. But you also don't want to let accusations stick without some type of response or people will suspect maybe there's some truth to them. Humor is actually one of the best ways to go if you can manage it. You can always say something like "Come on, don't be like that" or "that's unfair". Mudflinging or descriptive arguments in public doesn't usually make you look good, even if it's to defend your position. It's a weird bit of psychology.

    If your boss gets to the point where humor is no longer appropriate, your best to simply be polite, terse, and professional in your responses or tell him you decided it would be best to leave early. If he becomes verbally abusive, there's not a lot you can do if you want to leave on good terms. The fact is your boss will still be there after you leave the job and you won't be able to defend yourself if he feels like defacing your name.

  189. Never give two weeks notice by Jerim · · Score: 1

    On occassions where I needed to leave a company, I consulted all manner of advice. The consensus was always that the 2 weeks notice only benefits the employer. From what I have read, the best thing is to offer a few days notice and then to help them train someone to take over. After all, they should promote someone into your position instead of hiring from outside the company. If it is someone from within the company, the training should be no more than a week. If they decide to hire outside the company, then that is their choice and they take on the burden of training them. I have never once given 2 weeks notice and it has never come back to haunt me.

    You have proven the advice that a 2 weeks notice gives the employer ample opportunity to drag you name through the mud. This is so the employer will have the upper hand in saying that he had to let you go, instead of you leaving him. If I were you, I would already be gone, citing your bosses behavior. You already have a job lined up. And if your boss continues to berate you after you leave, you have a legal case against him.

    To answer you question though, there is very little you can do to leave on good terms. If your employer is bent on being a jerk, nothing you can do. Don't worry about leaving on good terms. Worry about leaving with your reputation in tact. Leaving on good terms has more to do with sitting down with your boss and explaining your decision, then leaving. It has less to do with how long you stay around. If you had left the same day you advised your boss of your decision, he would have had zero opportunity to make you loook bad.

  190. leaving on good terms usually requires more than 2 by Hohlraum · · Score: 1

    weeks notice in a small company. I have a friend that is leaving a large military contractor on 2 weeks notice with no hard feelings. But when he left the company I still work for previously he gave a months notice and there are no hard feelings at all. Its really not a great idea to only give two weeks notice IMHO. If I only gave two weeks notice at the place I work right now I think I'd never hear the end of it.

  191. Withholding Last Paycheck = Illegial? by Anti-Trend · · Score: 1

    ...At least in California, withholding of the last paycheck is not legal, IIRC, IANAL, etc. An employer must provide the check within three days of the employee's departure, or a full day's wage is tacked onto the sum for every day the check is tardy. Now, I could be wrong, and this could only apply to the termination of employment by the employer and wouldn't apply in the case of the employee quitting. However, I'm not completely convinced of this either. Are there any experts in legal labor disputes in the house which could shed some light on this one?

    -AT

    --
    Working in a DevOps shop is like playing in a band made up entirely of keytarists.
    1. Re:Withholding Last Paycheck = Illegial? by edb · · Score: 1

      Actually, my understanding of California labor law (and as an employer in CA I hope I understand it correctly!) is that the last paycheck must be given the very same day if the termination is at the will of the employer.

      If the termination is at the will of the employee, whether with or without notice (e.g. simply not showing up for work for x number of days as specified in the employment contract), the final paycheck must be mailed by US First Class Mail within 2 days of the time the termination is known.

      Of course, it's much cleaner to have that hand-written paycheck ready, even if it includes hours that might have been worked but turned out not to be (because of being walked out the door right away). That's another part of the reason that paying for 2 weeks of "at home" work is common.

      --
      In theory, practice and theory are the same. In practice, they rarely are.
    2. Re:Withholding Last Paycheck = Illegial? by CowbertPrime · · Score: 1

      hand written check? are we back to the good 'ole days of dot matrix printers now? everyone uses payroll companies that distribute preprinted checks these days. Most people are on some sort of direct deposit system anyway and don't see a check to begin with (only the stub).

    3. Re:Withholding Last Paycheck = Illegial? by edb · · Score: 1

      Well, not exactly hand-written. Printed out of Quicken. We do use a payroll system with direct deposit, but it does not have the required same-day turnaround. We have to enter all the payroll data somewhat in advance of the actual payday.

      Also, it's not clear to me whether direct deposit which actually appears sometime overnight really would meet the requirement of last pay "same day", which is my understanding of the law based on advice from a lawyer.

      --
      In theory, practice and theory are the same. In practice, they rarely are.
  192. Incorrect in more ways than one by C_Kode · · Score: 4, Informative

    Many people say you should take legal action if they withhold your paycheck. First off, it will cost a hell of alot more to *take legal action* than a single paychecks value. (unless you are paid something excessivly stupid amount, then you would be the moron for leaving!) All you would have to do is contact the local labor board and inform them of the situiation. Your employer would be contacted by one of their reps, and the would comply in a hurry as no employer wants the labor board breathing down their neck.

    It would cost you any attorney fees either.

    1. Re:Incorrect in more ways than one by QuestorTapes · · Score: 1

      I started to argue about the value of taking legal action, then I noticed you recommending he deal directly with the labor board. Exactly right; you normally don't need a lawyer for this. Every labor board varies, but all I know of will accept the complain without a lawyer.

      Another bonus; many states respond to allegations of employers fiddling with paychecks to audit the employer's payroll recordkeeping. Sometimes these rules are a pain; if they do so, it will most likely be a painful experience for the boss, even if they are diligent about recordkeeping. I once worked as an assistant manager for a company that got hit by the state for using the -wrong color pen- on bookeeper notes on employee timecards.

  193. OT: won not won by bluGill · · Score: 1

    I hate posting a correction with my poor English skills, but it took me a while to figure this one out, so I hope it helps.

    One is a number.

    Won is the past tense of win.

    They are both pronounced the same. In conversation I have no trouble with that, but my brain is wired such that I had trouble.

    Good post otherwise.

  194. Living well is the best revenge by hey! · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Reminds me of a young guy I once knew who worked for an outfit I did some consulting for. He'd worked there a couple of years while finishing up and defending his Phd dissertation, but was doign work well below is capabilities. After successfully defending his thesis, he landed an excellent job at a prestigious intitution.

    His boss at first was OK, then one day suddenly turned on him in the kind manner you describe, trying to humiliate him and doing everything short if cutting the buttons off of his blazer. The young guy was very cool about it, a total class act, but everyone else around was appalled. I asked the young guy about it later, and he shrugged, and said it didn't bother him too much because he was going places in this field, and the boss wasn't doing himself any favors in his future employment prospects.

    Of course, this kid was thinking in terms of years, but it turned out his prediction came true a lot faster. Some of the people who were remaining behind began quietly looking into the boss's Phd, and discovered it was fraudulent, and spread the information around where it would do the most damage.

    The lesson is that sometimes you really do create a kind of karmic force that affect your destiny. Take no action to harm your boss or your current company in any way; it's pointless since they can' harm you in this situation -- only you can harm yourself. Act with dignity and professionalism and everybody who can see this situation will remember all the more clearly for the contrast with your boss's actions.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:Living well is the best revenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good advice.

      The other tactic that I've used is to approach my boss and effectively say that "I'm not sure if this new job will work out, so let's have lunch in two or three months and we can talk about whether or not I made a mistake." It lets your boss think that you need him and will come back (so he'll keep treating you civilly), and it sets the groundwork to return if things really don't work out.

  195. Fired for giving notice by Nonesuch · · Score: 1
    By the same token, if you give notice that you intend to quit, your boss has the right to fire you immediately (but still has to pay any back pay he owes you and/or unused vacation time)
    . It's better than that, at least in most states.

    If you leave voluntarily or are fired "for cause", you cannot collect unemployment.

    If you give notice that you intend to leave voluntarily, and your boss choses to instead fire you before the date you state in your notice, that does not qualify as "for cause" nor as "leaving voluntarily", and you can collect unemployment. This has been upheld by several court cases.

    When former employees collect unemployment compensation, the unemployment insurance rate paid by their former employer increases. So always file for unemployment if you are eligible.

    1. Re:Fired for giving notice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If you leave voluntarily or are fired 'for cause', you cannot collect unemployment."

      Not necessarily true. You can always file. In many states, your employer must successfully contest your claim before you're denied benefits.

  196. Reply from the original poster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I am going to remain anonymous as to not make a bad situtation worse. I actually submitted this post back in January and was suprised to see it just posted now in May.

    I did finish out my two weeks, although it was hardly the most fun (or most productive) two weeks I've had. I did get paid in full despite several additional threats and got screwed a bit on banked vacation time. On my last day, when I walked into the boss's office to say goodbye, he acted busy, wouldn't shake my hand, and left the room.

    I appreciate everyone's feedback, though. Thankfully, I'm now working for a company that truly seems to value its employees, has some great benefits, and thus far, no total nutjobs. :-) It has made a huge difference in my life and while I miss a lot of the people (coworkers and clients) I worked with for so long, it was the right decision.

    Thanks again

  197. Document, document, document. Also, document. by GojiraDeMonstah · · Score: 1

    Document everything you can about the situation. Capture as much as possible in emails, and print them out and/or forward them to your gmail account. Including interactions with your nutso boss, co-workers, clients, etc.

    Because your question really isn't so much how do you leave on good terms (seems it's a bit late for that) but how do you do damage control going forward.

    If you leave with some type of recorded dialog (again, email seems ideal) that shows you have been calm, level-headed, forthright, etc., you will always have this to point back to in case your professionalism comes into question.

    It's a sad state of affairs, but by way of anecdote my own ass was best saved by an SMTP log after a nutso client claimed I had missed a deadline to email him a document. Log showed not only had I mailed it, but his SMTP server had accepted it. I didn't get an apology, but I did get the chance to smart-assedly refer him to some networking consultants @ $125/hr, should he continue to experience trouble with his mail domain.

    --
    "Stop throwing the Constitution in my face, it's just a goddamned piece of paper!" - George W. Bush Nov. 2005
  198. NO! work it out or get the police by bluGill · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Any situation where you cannot work until your last day and they have not told you to stay home with pay is a situation where you need police protection.

    Even if your next job is lined up, work out your last days. (Or work out a deal to leave early, often they will let you leave earlier than your required time, but be willing to work it out) You only think you have the next job lined up perfect, there are too many things you don't know.

    I have had jobs that seemed great for 3 months and then the funding fell through and I was on the street without a job in less than an hour. (the CEO basically said I could work next week, but he had just enough money to cover this weeks pay and no hope of enough to pay me for next week so I should file for unemployment)

    I've known others who discovered that the job was great, but traffic was worse than they thought, so the new job wasn't worth it.

    I've known some offers to be pulled after someone gives their two weeks. (This is a legal blurry area, they have some obligation to you at this point, but not much)

    I've known people who took jobs that seemed great, only to discover it was a terrible abusive company that could hide it well.

    Most people who switch jobs end up with a situation about like they expect, and they work there for a few years. However all of the above bad situations have happened, and they will happen again. If you are the unlucky person who it happens to you may have to fall back on the older job as a reference.

    Remember too, your former co-workers are you best source of reference. If I was actively looking for a job today (I'm always looking of course), I do not want those I'm working with to know, so I cannot use them as a reference. All that are left is people who have left this company before, and people I worked with at the last job. So keep your references.

  199. Psycho Boss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just checking, you don't work for Steve Jobs do you?

  200. Let him do it by Deadstick · · Score: 1
    even threatening to withhold my final paycheck if I don't find a replacement

    Check with your state attornety general's office...you may find you have the right to treat him to a visit from the sheriff. Tons of fun.

    rj

  201. I just changed and had a similar experience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just changed jobs and had a startlingly similar experience... I gave my two-weeks, my boss was initially understanding, but increasingly questioned what I was doing, what I had been up to, etc. On my final day, he even hinted at accusing me of installing keyloggers and backdoors, etc. Needless to say, I was a bit worried. The real problem I ran in to is that when I left he required I provide him copies of all my login/password pairs... I did so, and I am concerned that as a result he could have gone back and done some crazy jazz and then blamed me. :-( There's no refutability! What's a geek to do?

  202. Which states? by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    Last job I worked for, I lost all of my vacation time that I had accrued after the company decided "We're getting rid of our official vacation policy." (Translation: We're going to fire some people and we don't want to pay vacation.)

    I mentioned this to my spammer boss, and he said basically said that he'd falsify paperwork saying that I had already used my vacation time.

    1. Re:Which states? by mdfst13 · · Score: 1

      "he said basically said that he'd falsify paperwork saying that I had already used my vacation time."

      Yep, that's a good idea. It's not possible to detect false paperwork. Just ask Enron, Worldcomm, etc.

      Withholding a paycheck is a civil case. At worst, it's a fine. Faking paperwork and testifying to it (assuming you sued over it) is a *crime*. People go to jail for it.

    2. Re:Which states? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in these sitautions where someone can wrong me by holding the cards i dont resort to merely taking the cards. i will make them EAT the cards.
      you see , im fairly unstable and anti-authoritarian.
      so when faced with a boss like this i take them to my world.
      it aint a preety place in my world, man.
      its aplace where he's wrong and im horrible for being wrong too. the thing is, whgen i do something wrong like that i hurt inside for months. so i make sure its worth it. i wont simply hurt the other . i will break him.

      i will not stop at tears and sobbing. or begging.
      i want to go to that place of silence. where he will stop speaking for days. and the trauma cousellors
      give up on him thinking he's gone catatonic.

      think of it as my nuclear option.
      ugly, messy and my last resort.

  203. Talk to a lawyer... by moronikos · · Score: 0

    It will only cost $100-150 tops, if anything at all, and you will have more piece of mind.

  204. Withholding pay by dtfinch · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure it's illegal to withhold pay when an employee leaves, at least where I live. It says so on a poster in our break room detailing several state and federal employment regulations.

  205. Legal Action not needed. by Run4yourlives · · Score: 1

    Just call up the friendly neighbourhood labour board. That's what they get paid for, and they're incredibly efficient.

  206. The best way to leave by TheNarrator · · Score: 1

    If you would stay if the money was better, tell him you got a better offer and will need a 30% raise or a profit sharing plan in order to consider staying. He will give you the raise. Most companies have pretty fat margins if they've been around that long and you deserve a cut if you're vital to the company.

  207. Simple Psychology... by JRHelgeson · · Score: 1

    He's dealing with separation anxiety. He likes you and is fearing your loss and actually missing you, he's going through the steps of making a mental separation such that after you're gone, he can say that he's glad yer gone, rather than missing you. Makes it a lot easier on the psyche.

    This happens with all breakups where the individual has emotional insecurities. Chances are that he's a semi-psycho jerk because he deals with insecurities and views your separation personally, as a personal rejection of him and is therefore distancing himself.

    --
    Good security is based upon reality and common sense. Common sense is a function of having common knowledge.
  208. I suspect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I gave my boss my notice this week, and while he initially was understanding, he has since starting making accusations of conspiracy, deceit, and has otherwise attempted to make me look bad in front of employees and long-time clients.

    Sounds like you either worked for EA or were dating your boss; either way there's no way you're getting out of this one alive.

  209. Try working on the hill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    A friend I used to know told me this story.

    A certain congresswoman who his relative worked for had been at some form of PR event. One of the other congresspeople present, Barbara Boxer, or maybe Elanor Norton, I don't remember, was picked up by a limo. As our congresswoman was not, when she got back to the office, she lined her staff up and berated them, telling them the world would be better had they died in 9/11. No shit.

    From what his relative said, this type of treatment is kindof standard on the hill.

  210. Tough choices... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm in the telecomm industry. And at least around my office, there's a saying: "Don't like your boss? Wait about 6 months, you'll get a new one."

    If this manager is off the deep end, you owe it to yourself (and your co-workers) to have a little sit-down with the company brass. Reassure them that, in order to grow, you want to make a career change. You have spotted an opportunity in another industry, you'd hope that you can leave with their support, and at some point, you might want to return in another capacity. And if return isn't possible, you'd like to leave on good terms.

    You might also mention that some people (including the manager) appear to be taking this news kinda hard. Mention that you'd like to do a good job until the last day, and that you'd like to get through these final weeks without threats of retribution, lost wages, lawsuits, or physical violence (from the manager). Ask the top brass if they really want your help finding a replacement?

  211. Lawyer NOW! by PapaZit · · Score: 1

    By threatening to withhold your pay, your boss can now argue that he has changed the terms of your agreement. That is, he can claim that you knew that you wouldn't be paid unless you found a replacement, and therefore, by sticking around, you implicitly agreed to the new deal.

    Bogus? Sure. The thing is, you need to document what was said and when it was said and talk to a lawyer as soon as possible. If you wait, you may have a much harder time of things.

    --
    Forward, retransmit, or republish anything I say here. Just don't misquote me.
  212. Sounds familiar by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1
    I gave my boss my notice this week, and while he initially was understanding, he has since starting making accusations of conspiracy, deceit, and has otherwise attempted to make me look bad in front of employees and long-time clients.

    Let me guess: his name is Darl, and he also wants you to pay up front for a $699 license before you leave for stealing his precious.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  213. Re:leaving on good terms usually requires more tha by dick+johnson · · Score: 1

    It seems ludicrous to me that workers are still expected to give 'notice' to their employers in this new era of labor relations.

    The entire concept of giving notice harkens back to a day when companies showed some loyalty to workers, providing job security, retirement benefits, etc. You commonly went to work for a company when you were young and frequently didn't leave that job until retirement.

    Those days, as we all know, are over -- except for the increasingly small number of workers covered by union contracts.

    Today, if a company decides it can save money by laying off 10 percent of its work force, it does so and then commonly proceeds to have security escort the worker(s) from the building -- all in the same day.

    Practically, I know that folks are worried about being able to use the job as a reference. So people think they should still give notice.

    But it really does seem an anacronism this whole 'notice' concept.

    The two week notice rule is a vestige from the days when companies showed some level of loyalty to their workers.

    Those days are over.

    I think employees ought to show the same level of loyalty to employers that those companies now show their workers.

    --
    - dj
  214. Very Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Its all very simple since he has given you an
    out with the paycheck comment.

    You don't work for free. You tell him that
    such a condition (working with the possiblity
    of not getting paid) is not acceptable and
    that you must now leave. (You will have
    previously packed up all your stuff and
    brought it home at lunchtime right?) You
    tell him that you are available to work as
    a paid consultant for $300 an hour, billable
    weekly. This amount covers the possiblity
    of not getting a last paycheck (as soon as
    he misses one you are gone or the rate doubles)

    You have a huge opportunity to use this guy's
    fear to raid his walet. This is what makes
    the good old USA great. Don't miss out.
    You will regret it later.

  215. OT: fingers by dubl-u · · Score: 5, Funny

    What shocks me is that people always forget the old addage that when there's one finger point at something, there are four fingers pointing back at the person pointing.

    Try as I might, I can get at most three fingers pointing back at me. Am I doing it wrong?

    1. Re:OT: fingers by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 3, Funny

      My bad.

      Sheesh. Just because I used to teach Algebra, people seem to think I can count.

    2. Re:OT: fingers by nharmon · · Score: 1

      You're not pointing with your thumb. See Bill Clinton.

    3. Re:OT: fingers by CyberKnet · · Score: 2, Funny

      Try as I might, I can get at most three fingers pointing back at me. Am I doing it wrong?

      Obviously you are not using both hands. And everyone knows that if you are going to do it, you need to use both hands, or the result is simply less than spectacular.

      anyways.

      --
      Video meliora proboque deteriora sequor - Ovidius
    4. Re:OT: fingers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      try pointing with your thumb ;)

    5. Re:OT: fingers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Point with your thumb

    6. Re:OT: fingers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My bad.

      While I was aware that you could verb nouns, I didn't know you could noun an adjective.

  216. beware of "letters of recommendation" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    get the "letter of recommendation" from a colleague,not the unwanted boss. My experience was to leave a job "on good terms" with reference and then discover some years later when I was loooking for a new job and found my resumes being ignored. They were not being ignored , the reference (as it should have been) was being followed up and my old former boss's attitude had turned poisonous. I shredded that reference and quickly found employment thereafter.

    It is worth posing as a potential employer just to
    see if you are being bad mouthed. Sadly, it happens.

  217. So find him a replacement!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go ahead and find him a replacement. It doesn't have to be a good replacement. Maybe someone that used to work at Taco Bell or Denny's. Or you could be helpful to some young kid at the local college. Call job placement and see if they can get you someone. This way you can give a kid a foot in the door and get your boss off your back and smiling again. At lest for awhile.

  218. lawyer time by drwho · · Score: 1

    I'd walk out, and hire a lawyer, and have the lawyer tell them the scoop.

    You may be worried about getting a bad reference. Don't be. An employer may not lie about the length of time you have been at a job. If they do, you can sue and collect lots of money and get them a criminal record, possibly jail time. But most won't even do that, because, in many jurisdictions, the bort case law and legislation very much favors the employee in this type of dispute. Some places now won't do more than confirm the position you held, for how long, and possibly your salary (and maybe if you managed others).

    I had an employer threaten me once, in a similar way. After I talked to their lawyer and informed him of my position in the case, and let him know I saw the problem, and that I knew how things like this worked, I never heard any more from the employer - the lawyer no doubt told them they didn't have a leg to stand on. For a reference, I used someone who had already left the company.

    The woman who threatened me, later got in a dispute with her father, who owned the company, was fired and disinherited. The company later went bankrupt, and was dissolved. Good riddance! Too bad, they had some really nice technology patents in the industrial water treatment industry, but the family was just crazy.

  219. Withholding timecards is Not Illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's one thing to ask. How does one keep the pay situation from turning into a he said she said? Do you all photocopy your time cards, and what if it's all electronic?

  220. My experience by technoCon · · Score: 1

    I make a lot of friends and keep track of their skillsets, thus I have generally recommended one or two names when I've left a smaller firm. Larger firms are on their own.

    Moreover, I've made a point to keep things friendly with former employers. They have been the source of some lucrative moonlighting gigs.

    If the top dog is acting oddly, just be patient and get out with minimum unpleasantness. He'll forget his displeasure if you give him no cause. Keep your promises and don't take him too seriously. After a while he'll calm down and you may find the relationship advantageous in the future.

    This is going to sound like psychobabble, but it's true. The money and the work are secondary and your relationships are primary. Be true to your friends and treat people fairly, including insane bosses.

  221. That final paycheck by TheMCP · · Score: 4, Informative

    I believe every state has a law about issuing paychecks within a certain amount of time after the end of the pay period. The employee who receives a threat from the boss that a paycheck will be withheld should immediately contact their state's attorney general's office to find out what their rights are and see if the office can offer any advice about how to handle the threats. (Do they think he should ignore the threat and see what happens? Or tell him on the spot that it's illegal? Or walk out the door immediately?)

    In Massachusetts, if I remember correctly the employer may not withhold a paycheck for more than a week after the paycheck for the pay period would normally be issued, and in the case of a termination or layoff, they're required to issue a paycheck, expenses, and pay for accrued vacation all on the day of the termination or layoff. I'm not sure what the penalties are. The attorney general's office can refer you to appropriate legal resources, or may even choose to get directly involved with getting you paid.

    I had one incident of an employer trying to not pay me. The AG's office said that yes, they'd take legal action on my behalf if necessary, but first they wanted me to simply demand the money in their name. That got me my money, much to my surprise.

    1. Re:That final paycheck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't as surprising as you might think. In my first job for a big company the HR department forgot to mention to me that my paychecks would be delayed a month because I was a temporary employee. So, about a month in I come in and announce to my boss that I didn't get a paycheck, and ask what is going on. He went to his boss, who was a vice president in the company. Long story short, one of the VPs of the company spent half a day yelling at HR because an intern wasn't getting paid on time.

      The consequences for a company of not paying an employee are pretty big, not just getting in trouble with the attorney general, but who wants to work for a company that didn't pay its employees. That sort of lawsuit is BAD publicity and can ruin comapnies.

    2. Re:That final paycheck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      As somebody who doesn't like confrontation and a keen awareness of how delusional this person may be I'd go with the following:

      Read your labour law. Being educated is the best defence. Then write a polite letter containing the relevant sections of the law, and outlining your reasons for wanting to change job, obviously not referring to him a major reason. Print the letter (always looks better on paper for some bizarre reason) and put it on his desk.

      This may work in making him aware that you're not a walk-over, that you know your legal rights and may even come as a surprise / reminder to him. You might both walk away with face saved and he may reconnect with reality and the limitations on his power.

    3. Re:That final paycheck by nachoboy · · Score: 1

      In Massachusetts, if I remember correctly the employer may not withhold a paycheck for more than a week after the paycheck for the pay period would normally be issued, and in the case of a termination or layoff, they're required to issue a paycheck, expenses, and pay for accrued vacation all on the day of the termination or layoff.

      I've lived in at least 2 other states that have "same day paycheck" rules for involuntary termination. It sounds great in theory. One sleazy company got around this law by never firing anyone on the spot. They would only 'suspend' the employee until the end of the pay period. Once payday rolled around and the check was ready, you would be officially fired. It prevented them from ever having to write on-demand checks while still complying with the letter of the law.

  222. This is quite wrong. by Noose+For+A+Neck · · Score: 1

    Many lawyers specialize in a certain field of law and work in it for most of their professional careers. Some fields, like medical malpractice, demand this sort of specialization.

    --

    Software piracy is victimless theft.

    1. Re:This is quite wrong. by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Right, but at the training level there is no real specialization. With a JD and a bar membership you are presumed to be able to work in any field of law.

      Other countries often have different actual training programs; judges, for example, will go through a different university curriculum, then be judges their whole career.

  223. He IS the boss, after all.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the reason he's all pissed is because you are a good employee, a true assett to the company, and because you are leaving he feels that he's losing an integral part... these first-post llamas have no idea what they're talking about: getting up in your bosses face is simply NOT the way to go about this. He's dismayed and is simply going NUTS! Your best bet is to put the word out to your associates that you feel might be a credit to your position, as well as to your current boss - it will be shakey, but by law, he cannot withhold your final paycheck - that's just a sarcastic hint that he doesn't want to see you heave. You say he's trying to make you look bad, but it's not even over yet. You can come up with a list of 10 people, walk in there each day and drop 3 of their names and, possibly, their resumes on his desk and walk out. Don't say a thing. If he tries to banter you, simply tell him "we've all got jobs to do." and go right back to it. He simply cannot fire you and if he actually does withhold your paycheck, then that makes HIM look bad because he would actually take that action. And it wouldn't be your fault. That's something that he KNOWS.

    Bottom line is this: find some real prospectives, that's what he's asked for. Put your foot down but don't get up in his face about it. Not until the last day (if necessary) should you even consider retaliation, and if you do, keep it subtle and chilled-out, otherwise you'll be looking at a short time at your new job!!

    It wouldn't hurt to, the same day that you wind up leaving the company, to leave him a note or a phone call and thank him for his honesty.

    1. Re:He IS the boss, after all.... by SilverspurG · · Score: 1

      I think you're leaving out the part that normal employees don't have access to resume databases.

      Sure, you could register with any of the online job boards purporting to be an employer. I imagine there are roadblocks to that which must be circumvented, possibly even financial roadblocks. HR departments don't let just any employee go perusing through their stack of submitted resumes.

      All in all, companies LIKE keeping employees ignorant of the competing talent. It'd probably be quite a huge hole blown in the HR industry if we could all see each other's resumes. I bet it'd be better than catching the president with his pants down, his hand on the VPs wife, his foot on the neighbor's husband, and his mouth full of shaving cream while wearing women's lingerie.

      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
  224. Talk to the labor board *now*... by Don'tBAWank! · · Score: 0

    Talk to the labor board *now*, rather than after you find out he's not paying you.

  225. Never give two weeks notice-AMEN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bump this bad boy up. Sometimes the best advice is the simplist advice. Even as one poster pointed out about handling "nuts". Keeping the situation from even arising is better than trying to defuse it after.

  226. Paycheck by vbrtrmn · · Score: 1

    If he says he will withhold your paycheck... First contact your state workers' rights department, names vary per state, and turn him in. Next, contact a lawyer and sue his pants off.

    --
    it's a sig, wtf?
  227. Living right is the best revenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The simplist thing to remember about "karma" is that a lot of people have loooong memories. Be a "Mister Rodgers" to everyone. And on your deathbed people will only speak good things about you.

  228. The way I left by salmonz · · Score: 1

    I quit by saying I have to take care of my family (which I do), I gave two weeks, and then started my own company. I'm expecting to do a million in sales this year alone.

    I wanted to leave on good terms and that was the best excuse. I know it seems like a pussy way of leaving, but telling your employer the real reasons is not professional at all. You just burned your bridges for references, networking, possible future employment, etc.

    The last thing I did before I left, I thanked the owner of the medium size corporation I worked for personally. Alot of my former co-workers said that was the best move anyone could do.

    1. Re:The way I left by salmonz · · Score: 1

      I forgot to mention, this company needed me to do alot of things. I understood the best how their databases and servers aligned with their business processes. Alot of people said that the company needed me more than I needed them. Oh well, I quit, not my problem.

    2. Re:The way I left by humankind · · Score: 1

      I forgot to mention, this company needed me to do alot of things. I understood the best how their databases and servers aligned with their business processes. Alot of people said that the company needed me more than I needed them. Oh well, I quit, not my problem.

      Your new boss sounds like a real asshole.

  229. leave now by wardk · · Score: 1

    since he's made it clear he doesn't want to pay you for that last week, spend that unpaid week not working.

  230. Subject by Legion303 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Is it worth sticking out the few weeks I already told him I worked, or should I just cut my losses and leave early?"

    [Trollmode="off"]

    It depends on how you want future employers to see you. Do you want to be known as the guy who stuck with a tough situation and honored his obligations, or the guy who "cut his losses" (as other people are suggesting) and ran?

    1. Re:Subject by SilverspurG · · Score: 1

      Do you want to be known as a lapdog who will happily eat a mouthful of poo and ask for more...

      Or do you want to be known as the guy who will put his foot down and say "Enough is enough" when things go too far?

      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
  231. you pussy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sounds like you need your balls reatached. stand up to this fuckwit

  232. Regarding working through notice by TheMCP · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's quite common in the computer industry that when an employee gives their notice, the employer just lets them go, because they're considered a security risk once they're known to be planning to depart. It's not a comment on the employee at all, it's really nothing personal.

    So, if you don't want to work through your notice because the employer reacts badly, you can always tell the new employer that the old one decided that having anyone around after they gave notice is a risk, and so you're available early. If they're at all professional, the new employer will have no problem with this.

    Also, it happens that sometimes when an employee gives notice, the old employer doesn't assign them any new work that they might have to leave in the middle of, so you simply finish everything before your notice is up and have nothing left to do, and so they let you go. That's another perfectly reasonable excuse for not completing your given notice period, as far as the new employer should be concerned.

    Or, well, if you have the money in the bank, it's already less than two weeks... you could just take a few days off unpaid.

  233. Illegal to withhold paycheck by keith73 · · Score: 1

    I dont know about other states, but in NJ it would be illegal for him to withhold your paycheck. Look into what protections your state has for workers and remind him of that.

    I agree that he has burned that bridge and you should probably just go. He cant require you to stay and as others have pointed out, it is his responsibility to find a replacement, not yours.

    --
    -- Does anybody know where the 'any' key is on the keyboard?
  234. Just get through the next couple of weeks and by bewert · · Score: 1

    document everything. Record conversations, take notes that are dated and preferably even signed by co-worker witnesses, without being an ass about it. Fulfill your agreement even of he doesn't fulfill his. This way you are covering your ass if he tries to screw you out of your last check or something.

    But don't turn the screws on the guy, rather be the real grown-up. He needs you, you know it, and for sure everyone else knows it. So simply turn the other cheek and in the long run all those who are witness to the spectacle remember not only your great worth, but also your great character. And he might just publicly meltdown if you act like you don't really care what the fuck he does.

    That's worth a lot more down the road than some childish bullshit to get back at him. The couple of weeks will be nothing in the greater scheme of things. Trust me--I've hired and fired plenty of people in the last 46 years.

  235. Harassment by tonicxt · · Score: 0

    It sounds almost comical. To answer your questions on resignation

    When an employee gives their notice, they should take their holiday time as well. There are two ways an employer will react to a resignation notice; they will work the employee like a mule, or will give the employee nothing to do, since they realize he won't be giving a fuck what happens,since he has only 2 weeks left.

    His actions are highly unprofessional and harassement. Don't argue with him; dont give him any fuel to bitch about, and don't worry about any threats. IF he withholds your paycheck, go to your state/provinces labour relations board, and have them force him to pay you. In order to do this, you must record your days/hours worked.

    Here in Canada BC, the labour relations board is very swift with these issues, and fines are very heavy.

    Don't cut your losses and leave early... I recommend you take a serious look into work place harassement; you'll be very surprised as to what constitues it (its anything spoken/given in an unwanted way....even gossip constitutes this).

    Burning your bridges is not a concern either. Keeping good ties with such an individual, trying to associate with someone like that, looks very poorly upon you.

    Bottom line: Its harassement, and thats illegal. But I don't think you will take action; posting your issue on slashdot is evidence enough of your extreme cowardice. Anyone that needs motivation to stick up for themselvs is already a lost cause.

    -TonicxT

    1. Re:Harassment by SilverspurG · · Score: 1
      Bottom line: Its harassement, and thats illegal
      Yes, it is, but there are several fine points which make it not quite so cut and dried. These include (but are not limited to) any of the following.

      The cost of a private attorney. Not cheap. Unless you're a member of a federally defined demographic (race, religion, sexual preference, disability, military service, gender) which nearly guarantees an upper hand in a legal battle, most employment law attorneys will ask for a $5000 retainer fee (at least) just to file the paperwork for the initial inquiries. Meanwhile, you still may be without income.

      Witnesses. Very few coworkers are willing to jeopardize their positions just to testify for you. Without witnesses or a member of a federally defined demographic the case is extremely weak. Companies are very careful to put nothing in official paperwork which can be used against them.

      If a manager wants to harass someone there's a very easy way to play the game. Harass the employee just a little, just a little, just a little, and wait for the employee to retaliate. The moment the employee does anything which could be remotely considered unruly or disruptive it is quietly documented without any notice given to the employee. Repeat repeat repeat. If done correctly the employee's retaliation will gradually become more and more noticeable and possibly increase in severity. The manager escalates their harassment accordingly being very careful to only commit the harassment in forums which are private or watched only by people who back them politically. After about 25 or so secret documented instances the company has a perfect case against the employee. The manager is then free to harass at will and, when the employee finally explodes, they can be terminated without a problem.

      Simple.

      You're also forgetting that, for some pathetic reason, the concept of hazing by those in authority is ingrained in our society, maybe even in human behavior. People in superior positions are always harassing their subordinates. Some do it because they like to watch people run in circles--it's amusing for them. Many do it because they feel "it happened to me, so I can do it to them" (it's sick, but many people think this way). Others do it because they're trying to manipulate their subordinates. Sometimes it's done to wear an employee down for sexual advances. Often it's done because the manager has a poor personal life and they're simply letting the crap roll downhill, using their subordinates as stress relievers. Many families function this way. In American society especially (and possibly in others) the older folks generally love to wind up a younger person just to watch them spin off. For them its cheap entertainment. If it gets out of hand the police can always be called. The harasser is always in a calm state of mind--they've been entertained. The harassee is always distraught and out of their head. Police, in general, are pretty stupid about this and won't even question the older person's story that the younger person just randomly flew off the handle.

      Laws against harassment are little more than lip service and token gestures to pacify the general population. Those who win harassment suits are poster children--again, token gestures to pacify the general population.

      For the most part, it's business as usual in the world. It's all fun and games until someone gets poked in the eye--and then it's the victim's fault.
      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
  236. Pyscho by ActionAL · · Score: 1

    Just a note...

    Your boss is a psychopath or sociopath.
    Google the characteristics of these types of people and print it out and show it to him and circle the ones that describe him.

  237. Not alone by ThatJimGuy · · Score: 1

    My first job was when I still had 3 credit hours to complete for my degree. It was a low paying job (18K), but they promised that when I got my degree I would get a 10K raise. It was only 2-3K. I looked for my next job and found it quickly. That was a good one, about a 10K raise per year, but my boss was a umm &#&$^@(&$#@^. Left for my next job. Nice pay, nice raises, but one hell of a work week and travel (60-80 hrs/wk and avg 1000 mi/week travel) all this on salary, so no OT or travel money. Finally I found the ideal job, but the stress from the other ones really killed me.

    In all these jobs, I gave the appropriate notice, but was blasted my management. What was worse, management told my fellow workers bull*** and said I screwed them. It happens!!!

    Go forward and don't look back!

    --
    "I think the mistake a lot of us make is thinking the state-appointed shrink is our friend." - Jack Handy
  238. walk away by floatt · · Score: 1

    Been there, done that. Just walk away. You're leaving for a reason. You didn't really think this guy was going to be a good reference anyway, did you?

    1. Re:walk away by PigleT · · Score: 1

      I'm not convinced that's a good thing. There are some pretty canny CV-readers (or resume-readers for left-pondians readign) out there, as witnessed by the fact I've been asked "so why did you only stay with for 1yr?". It's quite hard to say "because they were evil slimeballs" without feeling awkward.

      In this case, since our poster has survived these wazzocks for a few years, I'd be inclined to go with the opinion it's a temporary abberation and work through the minimum time remaining - and if money doesn't come, sue afterwards.

      --
      ~Tim
      --
      .|` Clouds cross the black moonlight,
      Rushing on down to the circle of the turn
  239. Just Burn Them by amemily · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My personal experience in these matters, may not be applicable since I work in an entirely different world.

    A few months ago, I was given my choice of IT positions with three diferent state agencies and a half-dozen well-paying urban school districts. At the time I was working for a rural class A school district with a boss who is the sterotypical school teacher dumped into an IT manager position - basically he couldn't manage his way out of a paperbag. His brillant idea was that I was going to stick around until the end of the school year and look for a job than. Yea right, I really wasn't going to stay, if I wasn't "importaint enough" to be paid a decent salary and to be treated with some basic respect, I wasn't "importaint enough" to stick around that long.

    For that, his and some of my collegues's attitudes over the past years, and other reasons I rather not get into....after negoiating my start date with my new boss, I handed in my notice to the supt timed so that I was gone days before semester changeover when the place turns into a clusterfuck with pissy schoolteachers demanding the world.

    Five months later, my ex-collegues in my old department still will not speak to me...personally, I think they got what they deserved. Just because I am female doesn't mean I'm an instant secretary, nor does it mean I'm physically unable to pick up a computer and move the damned thing....there is a fine line between being nice and being an insulting asshole.

    It is nice when you can escape a workplace that causes you to live on antacids.

    And karma can be a bitch sometimes....that district is on the verge of imploding on itself with their new superitendent coming onboard who is not well-liked enough by both the old-guard and younger staff members that they are looking at leaving.

    Hi Steve Z if you are reading this, we all know you hang out on ./

    1. Re:Just Burn Them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you bitch. We all knew you slept your way into that new job. Thats why we stopped talking to you.

  240. been there by MikeFM · · Score: 1

    The last guy I worked for was psycho like that. We spent months of wasted time because he was sure someone was hacking him and wanted me to catch them. He went so far as to call the FBI. At the same time he didn'twant to pay me for my time spent monitoring system logs and going through all the steps of the insane paranoid security he wanted.

    Finally he kept threatening to fire me because I was spending so much time on security, at his request, and I expected paid for that time. He didn't want me to spend less time on it either.

    Finally he got to accussing all of his employees, including myself, of plotting against him and stopped paying us. He was mad that we weren't loyal enough to keep working for him after he stopping paying us.

    I swear that I don't know how some of these pyscho jerks ever get into business let alone stay there. A couple of us tried to start a similar business after we all quit from him but we hadn't planned it before he stopped paying us. Without any start-up capital we haven't done that well but we did get a few clients. For the most part I've switched to working for a new company though. So far this new company seems cool and level headed. A good switch.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  241. Been in a bad situation myself and learned from it by ks5d · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can defintely sympathize with your current predicament -- my first full-time job was for a small software development company that turned out to be a real sweat shop. I got hired on because a friend of mine for years -- I'll call him Jim -- was working there and they needed someone else. I knew I'd be working for him, but we got along fine so I wasn't worried. Big mistake.

    In short, I didn't know Jim except as a peer and as a manager he micromanaged and browbeat everyone, including me. I realized soon after starting that I couldn't talk to Jim and reason with him -- he just was completely closed off about it. So after a while, I spoke to the owner and explained why I couldn't work there anymore since it was what I considered to be a hostile work environment. Rather than listen to me, he called in my about-to-be-former friend and made me explain to his face why I couldn't work there. I did it, and as a result the two weeks notice I offered I wound up having to retract after Jim punched his fist through the drywall in the office.

    Moral of the story? First, never mix friendship with work -- it never works out, especially if you were friends in some other context first. And second, if faced with a constantly hostile work environment, you owe it to your own sanity and self-worth to remove yourself from the situation. Remember, hostility in the office is grounds for litigation.

    I don't think he can justify holding back your paycheck; if he feels differently, I imagine that a phone call from your attorney would clear that up in a hurry. As for finding a replacement for you, if he actually feels like that is your responsibility then you should get out of there before he goes further over the edge than he already is. Don't confront him directly about the paycheck if he refuses -- the cost of an hour or two of time for an attorney is worth the freedom from the hassle and the rest of that paycheck.

    Just my two cents' worth -- others' mileage may vary. Best of luck with your dilemma...these things are why life is hard. Just remember to be honorable about what you do and say but don't take crushing abuse because you think you have no alternative. It's the battered wife syndrome applied to the workplace...

  242. As an employer myself by scronline · · Score: 1

    Someone doing this is a problem in so many ways. He's open himself up for lawsuits out the wazoo. First, Defamation of Character leaps to mind. Secondly, he CANNOT withhold your paycheck. If he doesn't pay you, sue his ass!

    I'm sorry, but this makes "small business" owners look bad. And quite frankly, were I you, I'd bail, request my paycheck before I leave, and just be done with it. It's hard enough for small business owners to find good help for what they can afford to pay without having to deal with former employers that pulled this kind of crap.

    1. Re:As an employer myself by DiamondGeezer · · Score: 1

      I'm not too familiar with the American environment, but when small businesses screw their employees like this, does a call to the local "Better Business Bureau" help?

      --
      Tubby or not tubby. Fat is the question
    2. Re:As an employer myself by LouCifer · · Score: 1

      The BBB is a joke and is useless. No, it doesn't help to call the BBB anymore.

      --
      Religion is for people afraid of going to hell.
    3. Re:As an employer myself by scronline · · Score: 1

      The BBB is probably the most useless organization the US has. I'm still stuck with a $2000 notebook that had bad video memory and the BBB wouldn't do anything about it...literally. They took the business's side.

      More often than not the BBB does take the business's side unless it's complete and utter gross negligence that can be proven beyond even a glimmer of doubt and has actually resulted in injury.

      What's even more sad about it is I'm a business owner and I'm bashing the BBB. I've had to deal with a few issues with them. Usually it is a lame complaint, but you have a stack of papers you have to fill out and once they receive those, the case is usually closed. It's an utter waste of time for both sides.

  243. Or elses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Arange for a tax audit of him and the company, get a bunch of smelly asshole drunk homless people, get someone that's more nuts, arange for a bunch of somewhat qualifide gay/bi/black(or someother hot booten minority group) to apply, and also arange for the above plus some disability, have his house reassesed,hire a bunch of hoodrats, and hire a ton of KKK folks (remember if their qualifide they are technically protected under the law), hire a ton of charismatic hippy know it all stoners (you know the type: Duuude this like suchs man because of [abc reasons that somehow makesense and you dont want to admit it], install lots and lots of anoying automagic sound making stuff on the computers (or better let someone else do it), and last but not least GPL all your stuff and just leave.

  244. IT Industry Employment Rule #1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you give your "two weeks notice", be prepared to be escorted from the building that day.

  245. Personal by kurtz_tan · · Score: 1

    For the many of us who has never been on the other side as the "boss"/supervisor and decide to fight fire with fire, let me give you an analogy. Think of the experience where your boy-friend/gal-friend for many years/months decide to end it suddenly. The hurt can sting you and lead into irrational behavious (hence the boss reaction). Feelings of betrayal etc are common. Look on the bright side, he really treasured you. I would suggest to request - the HR manager (if there is one) - a Senior colleague that can stand up to the boss to mediate. Do not burn bridges. This advise has served me well for the more than 10 years since I've worked.

  246. Hello Brian. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll be your psychologist;

    Your entire post is about defending homosexuality. I thought this a verry valiant attempt to propose the hippocricial thought of homosexuality. Brian, we've known eachother closely, does this have anything to do with Santa Clause not bringing you the strapon lesbian vagina you always wanted? Have you not been studying the content I've posted as Strapon Lesbian Strapon post?? Please, let me know; call me, and don't give up on yourself.

    Love,
    Dr. Dean aDildo, BS, MSH, WD40

    1. Re:Hello Brian. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get strap on vaginas?

  247. Yes, Stick It Out by nathanh · · Score: 1
    Is it worth sticking out the few weeks I already told him I worked, or should I just cut my losses and leave early?

    You are measured by your own actions, not by your boss's. If you made a promise to stay then you should stay. Only if there is the real and imminent threat of harm should you leave early.

    If you do the right thing then you can hold your head high when you leave.

  248. You don't have to put up with that crap. by jcr · · Score: 1

    Once he threatened to withhold money he owes you, he became a collection case. He is not your friend, he is not an asset to your resume.

    The next time he irritates you in any way, walk away. Then, if your final paycheck doesn't show up on schedule, just sell the recievable to a collection agency, and forget about him.

    If he persists in harassing you, sue his ass. You might end up owning the business.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  249. Keep working there for a bit by mrjb · · Score: 1

    Call in sick.

    --
    Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
  250. making things into a joke by gr8dude · · Score: 1

    In fact, this is a very good comment.

    This technique is very efficient, and I use it myself very often. Of course, there is always a more agressive way to reply to an attack. But making things into a joke gives you the _highest_ chance to calm the spirits, and maybe, eventually come to a mutual agreement.

    I've been doing this all the time, but only after studying psychology in high school, I became aware of this.

    One who can master jokes well, can use them as neutralizers, and as offensive weapons too. This is especially effective against intelligent people [provided your jokes are 'hi-tech' enough to require some brain-resources, i.e. one needs some intelligence to understand them]

  251. Is that you, Gene Ray? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gene Ray! It's gotta be you. I'm glad to finally teach you shmuch the truth. Stop lying about the truth, you evil bastard JEW! It's the Time Sphere you idiot! Where I am standing now, my neighbor is twenty-four hours apart from me while being only a 1-second walk from me. Figure that one out, jack ass white negro in guise. I married Wendy Whitebread whenever I cockslap her she yells the name of your mother. Need a hint?

  252. Easy revenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hire the biggest, most incompotent fuckwad you think you could get away with :)

  253. Animal Cruelty by turgid · · Score: 3, Funny
    Hell, in Texas you can probably shoot his ass for pulling shit like that.

    In the UK, if you shot someone's mule to settle a score, the RSPCA would find out and you'd likely get sent to prison.

    Anyway, I thought they all had tractors in Texas nowadays, what with all that oil.

    1. Re:Animal Cruelty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's OK. If you were to say you got caught smoking a fag in public in the US, you'd have a similar problem. (Given you'd have at least an 80% chance of being understood as having just indicated that you either killed a homosexual man or performed oral sex on one).

      Here in the US, the first definition of "ass" is one's posterior, with the animal ranking as a less used definition.

    2. Re:Animal Cruelty by kniLnamiJ-neB · · Score: 1

      Good delivery. Wish I had mod points today...

      --
      Windows isn't the answer... it's the question. NO is the answer!
    3. Re:Animal Cruelty by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      In the UK, if you shot someone's mule to settle a score, the RSPCA would find out and you'd likely get sent to prison.

      In Soviet Russia, mule shoots you.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    4. Re:Animal Cruelty by smithmc · · Score: 1

      Anyway, I thought they all had tractors in Texas nowadays, what with all that oil.

      Well, you gotta keep somethin' around that you can shoot!

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  254. fake a sick relative. by wadiwood · · Score: 1

    Say that you're quitting because someone in your immediate family has cancer and you'd like to spend more time with them.

    You don't need to mention that "more time" involves two weeks in Hawaii and that you've got a new job afterwards.

    If they ask, you can say it was a false alarm or that your relative had an op and is in remission for the time being.

    --

    -- it must be true, it's on the internet.
  255. Do you work at Bitkeeper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    by any chance? :-)

  256. Union by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just talk to your union! Everybody in the US is a member of a union, just like in europe, right?

  257. You can't win them all by santiago79830 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In 40 years of employment, I found there were some times that it was impossible to leave without burning bridges. Sure, it's best to avoid this if you can, but it just isn't always possible. You simply cannot control the actions of another individual; you can only influence them. My advice would be to keep documentation on what has happened, just in case you need it later. Meanwhile, you have no obligation to find a replacement, etc. You've given reasonable notice. You already have another job waiting. There is no reason to do anything else - unless you just want to leave early to avoid additional harassment. Don't blame yourself, or do anything silly because of someone else's actions. Best of luck!

  258. Take the High Road by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it were me I'd walk around the office shaking hands and saying goodbye to coworkers, wishing them luck.

    My last stop would be the boss' office: I would smile, shake his hand, thank him for the opportunity to work there, and then immediately leave.

  259. This one usually works by Get+Behind+the+Mule · · Score: 1

    Have someone tell your boss that you've died.

  260. Let your union handle it. by jdonnis · · Score: 0

    Threatening to withhold pay?
    Does he think you are living in some sort of feudal society, where he can abuse his peons as he please?

    You should ofcourse immediately contact your union and let them and their lawyers handle it.

    If you are not in a union - well, then you should have thought about that earlier.

    1. Re:Let your union handle it. by ddriver · · Score: 1

      When did we get an IT workers union? IT is management baby, there is no union.

      --
      I found my inner child, then I got caught abusing it...
    2. Re:Let your union handle it. by jdonnis · · Score: 1

      Well, in the country where I live there are at least 2 unions for IT professionals.

      http://prosa.dk/om_prosa/engelsk/ one, Prosa, has a page in english.
      http://www.samdata.dk/start/default.asp the other Samdata does not.

  261. Department of Labor will handle it all for you by cliffpeaslee · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I ran into a similar situation, and the DOL sent a threatening letter to my boss, and he complied about as quick as he received it. I considered small claims, but that would have taken months and I'd have to pay for lawyer. DOL is quick (at least in NH). I filed on Saturday, he received the letter on Thursday, and he had to pay by Monday (10 days). If he refused, then the state would defend me. Oh, it is all actionable if he misses the pay period. Good luck.

    1. Re:Department of Labor will handle it all for you by LouCifer · · Score: 1

      You can handle small claims yourself. Ever watch Judge Judy? That's small claims. Its $50 to file (in my area) and you don't need a layer.

      If the other party doesn't show, you get an automatic judgement in your favor I believe.

      IANAL, but this is my understanding.

      --
      Religion is for people afraid of going to hell.
  262. State labor board by LouCifer · · Score: 0, Redundant

    1. Pick up the phone book.
    2. Pick up the phone.
    3. Call state labor board.
    4. ???
    5. Profit.

    Honestly, call them. What he's threatening to do is illegal. Its not your job to find your replacement. That's HR's job. If there's not HR department, then its his goddamned problem.

    If you have a paper timesheet with a signature, get a copy. If its done on computer and signed off on, get a copy. Get copies of anything and everything. File in small claims court if you have to. This will help with the labor board.

    If the state labor board won't help you, threaten to take your clients with you. Either way, tell him if he tries to fuck you, you're going to fuck him. If he's already burned the bridge, blow up the embankments at both ends and kill the engineer, so to speak.

    --
    Religion is for people afraid of going to hell.
  263. How to leave gracefully (in the corporate world) by thelizman · · Score: 1
    Here's the scoop:

    • He cannot 'withold' your final paycheck. In fact, in many States he is required to render unto you your paycheck immediately upon your termination or last day of work.
    • If your boss truly is nuts, then you will not be able to rely on him for a good reference anyway. Get letters from other supervisors who know of your performance, or even from fellow coworkers.
    • Save any incriminating documentation you can, up to and including business secrets and client lists. I don't care if you signed an NDA. Here's the scoop: most NDA's are unenforcable anyway. They're designed to scare cubicle-bound white-collar wage slaves into not rocking the boat. And he's already accused you of high treason, conspiracy, and piracy on the high seas, so you might as well.
    • The ultimate revenge on an asshole boss is to leave, become better than you were under him, and then cut his feet out from under him. Don't hesitate to lure his talent away either. When I leave a job for a better one, I always try to take a few key people with me.
    • Don't leave any trace behind. If you have someone in IT, see if they can slip you a copy of the restore CD. When you leave work, put it in the drive, schedule a restart. If it's the 'cast' kind, it'll restore your machine to factory spec. As an alternative, "rm -f *" from root, or use FDISK under dos to crash the drive.


    I used to work for a real slime-ball myself. It was hard because on the one hand your work ethic drives you to do your best, but then your best winds up giving positive reinforcement to an individual who actually works against you in the long run. It's hard to do a good job and undermine the boss, and it doesn't make you a good person when you do succeed at corporate politicking. You can either be above it, or risk "the dark side'.
  264. Not a very bright boss by osgeek · · Score: 1

    Withholding paychecks is serious business. The only way to stop paying someone is to give him immediate notice that he is no longer employed, then you can stop paying him from that point. Withholding a salaried employee's already-accrued pay is really difficult to do.

    One call to your local labor board for withheld paychecks sets your former employer up for some intense serious ass fucking. You could probably get them in trouble just because they threatened it.

  265. Just get out with class by elnyka · · Score: 1
    Dude, your boss is an asshole. You already gave him the courtesy of notifiying him of your departure. Also, he can't withold your last paycheck. It's yours, and he is by law obliged to give it to you. AFAIK, you were not required to find a replacement, nor your paycheck was conditional to that. Therefore, if he threatens you with that bullcrap, tell him that you will contact the proper authorities (which you can btw).

    Also, if your boss is making things unbearable, just wrap things up and leave. I'd suggest you get your co-workers and clients' contact information for future reference. One of your senior co-workers may write a recommendation for you (or let you include them as references in future job references.)

    And if in a future interview, you are asked about the job you are currently leaving, just be brief about your job functions, and if pressed, just mentioned that your boss didn't take it well that you leave, and MENTION THAT HE THREATENED TO WITHOLD YOUR LAST PAYCHECK. If you are pressed to talk about it by an interviewer, make sure he/she understands (without going through the gory details), that your boss was the nutcase, not you.

    One last thing, in the remote case you actually get your last paycheck withold, just let it go (if your financial situation allows it of course.) The reason I'm saying is that trying to get your paycheck paid can be quite costly (legally), not counting the headaches and heart-poisoning that will come with it. Sometimes, it's better to let shit go. By doing so, you prove that you are a better person, and despite the monetary loss, you have a new start without bringing any baggage added by your nutcase boss.

    Good luck with your new job!!!!

    -- Luis

  266. just a word of warning by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 1

    In quite a few states it's illegal to record a conversation w/o the victim's explicit permission.

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
    1. Re:just a word of warning by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Informative
      It's illegal for *the police*, its not illegal for you to record your own conversation.

      And its not very likely that someone who's caught recorded harrassing someone and thratening to withhold paychecks, etc., is going to be in any position to complain.

      Here's some law: http://yarchive.net/phone/call_recording.html - phone conversations

      I have used tape recordings of my own phone calls in court. According
      to FCC rules, only one party to the conversation (that's me) now must
      to be aware of the recording. In other words, third party wiretapping
      is still illegal but it is not illegal to record your own
      conversations.
      and, even in states that require both partys' consent for a phone conversation, the same rules don't apply for non-phone conversations http://www.rtnda.org/resources/hiddencamera/michig an.html
      Participant recording
      Because Michigan's definition of "eavesdrop" is to "overhear, record, amplify or transmit any part of the private discourse of others," Michigan courts have held that participant recording (even without the consent of the other parties) is not prohibited. Therefore, a party to the conversation can record the conversation himself without obtaining the consent of the other parties. He cannot, however, employ a third party to record the conversation on his behalf without getting the consent of all the parties.
      People have been watching too much tv. Nobody will arrest you for recording your own activities in a place where there's no expectation of privacy.
  267. Bridge already burned by Procrastin8er · · Score: 0

    Sounds like the bridge has already been burned, by your boss. I would cut your losses and avoid any conflict and just leave as quietly as is possible.

    Just my two cents.

    --
    Slashdot - Where the slash is most definitely to the left.
  268. Bridges not just your boss by msheppard · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Remember that it's not just your boss you are trying to maintain a professional relationship with. If you just "walk off" you might be screwing over people other than him. Do what you can to maintain a good relationship with as many people as you can. You'll be suprised how that can help you in the long term. Most places don't want references from just your boss, they want people you've worked with too. Now might be a great time to go over his head and let his boss know that you are trying to help.

    M@

    --
    Krispy Cream is people
  269. Dangerous advice.. by sherriw · · Score: 1

    Careful, NDA (non disclosure) contracts ARE enforcable in court, at least in Canada and I believe in the US as well. Non-compete contracts are the ones that are of dubious enforcability. Protecting corporate 'secrets' and clients is a time tested legal right of companies. I have personal experience of this in my family (the company won in court and the employee lost - for taking away clients). Also, the arguement that you should 'stick it to em' is foolish. Burning bridges is always a bad idea. If 'the boss' has no legitimate reason to trash talk you... why give him one? Business is about networking and making contacts, not childish spite. Are you sure your new job won't fall through? Are you sure you'll never have to deal with your old employers ever again? Don't be.

  270. Be Very, Very Careful by xchknfrmr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've been in similar situations. One employer got into a fistfight with an employee who was leaving. You should 1. Turn in any keys, security cards, etc. NOW. If you have high security access to servers or other resources relinquish them NOW. Tell your boss why you are doing this (so that there won't be a possibility that you can be accused if something is missing, stolen, etc.) Do this publicly. 2. Do NOT tell your current employer who your next employer will be. Sometimes the nutzo employer will call your future employer and bad mouth you. If your next employer is smart they'll ignore him, but sometimes people lose job opportunities to this. 3. Contact your next employer and see if you can go ahead and start work now. 4. Don't confront your nutzoid employer, but do tell him (quietly and civil-like in PUBLIC) that you're uncomfortable with his hostile behavior and would he mind if you left now? 5. If he indicates that you may leave now-GET IT IN WRITING. if he says no, and continues to threaten you then report him to your local labor authorities. Don't leave until he's been contacted by the labor folks or your notice is up. 6. Do not agree to anything he requests, demands, etc. in private. ALWAYS be in public or have someone accompany you to any meetings with him. Back up any agreements with a formal memo detailing the agreement and copy someone else in the department as well as your boss.

  271. Help !!, I have a simillar problem but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've worked for this company 5 years. Built their tech infrastructure from scratch.
    I recently had a wonderful boss retire. An Amazing Leader indeed.

    The replacement boss is a a total screw up. She is the total opposite of my old boss. She will do anything to look good in front of anyone including but not limited to lying, backstabbing, and playing the victim. She makes dumb decisions and when they come back to bite her she either plays the victim or points the finger. She has done many uprofessional/unethical things. Allot of people have quit because of her but they where all afraid of letting anyone know she was the cause. The department is about to collapse and I'm afraid that if I leave they will have nobody to keep the systems operational.

    I am currently between job interviews. If I do get an offer what should i do? I feel that it is my duty to let people know what the problem is in the department so that management can do something about it but i'm afraid that it will backfire ( seeing how she is a pro at playing the victim game). I also feel attached to the work I've done and know that if I'm gone It would surely go to waste.

    Right now I'm planning to give a 2 weeks notice and at the last day of employment send a letter to management and carbon copy my boss about the problems she is creating without directly mentioning her name of course.

    OR

    Should i send a letter to management now to see what happens ? Before I get another job?

    Either way I am leaving because I'm deeply unhappy.

    Help?

    1. Re:Help !!, I have a simillar problem but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy. Wait until you get a new job, write a letter to her manager and CIO (cc:CEO) and give 2 wks notice at the same time.

      Sit back and do shiat for 2 weeks. Make her fire you. When she does, file unemployment while living off of your vacation and severance. I'd also notify the head of HR.

  272. Wrong (Assuming PTO) by scorp1us · · Score: 1

    If you have a paid-time-off policy, as nearly everyone does these days, that money is yours. You can't really take a "vacation" but assuming you had 80 hours in the PTO bank, you just walk out and you have every right to the time in the bank, which then is converted to a dollar amount based on your salary and the check gets mailed to you at the next payroll cycle. The effect is the same - you get 2 weeks paid off time.

    I worked at a payroll place, so I know what I am talking about.

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
  273. You can't.... by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 3, Insightful
    You can't leave this job on good terms. Your boss has already decided that question. You may still be able to leave on good terms with everyone else in the company by working to transition your tasks and knowledge, to ensure they aren't stuck cleaning up a train wreck. If your cow-orkers see that you are doing your utmost to ensure continuity and sanity for the company, then they will remember that when they leave -- which won't be long, IMHO. In a year or two, you may get a job or referral from them.

    I am not a lawyer, but unless you have an employment contract that says you are responsible for finding your own replacement, the boss cannot hold your final paycheck for that. Play it clean and to the rule to the end, and document, document, document. If you aren't paid promptly and in full after you leave, check to see if there is either a state labor board, or an arm of the U.S. Dept. of Labor (I'm assuming you're in the U.S.) having to do with wage complaints. Failing that, just file suit in small claims court. I'm betting he cuts the check for you the day he gets the summons.

    --
    "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
  274. Just the facts, from somone from Payroll by scorp1us · · Score: 1

    The 13th amendment did away with involuntary servitude. And as remote as that sounds, that does apply. Your employment is at-will, unless under contract. (Most contracts have exit clauses though. Note that you are completely free to contract into anything.) I do not think you are under contract.

    You have every right to any vaction time you have aquired. Take your most recent salary, divide by 2080 and multiply by the # of hours in the bank. That is the amount that you are entilted to, plus any hours worked this payroll period.*

    *Varies from state to state. It may be accounted for to the minute, to the day, or to the half-day, or even partial [half] day if you were late coming in one day.

    Small claims court is your friend, here in MD it only costs $40 to file and you can get 3x what is actually due as punitiave damages.

    NOT ADVICE: It could work in your favor to have a friend pose as an attorney and call your boss to "establish the facts" of the case and make him aware of the above facts. I do not know of any law that carries a penalty for posing as an attorney, unless you actually do it in a court of law. Hell you only have to mention names that sound like a law firm as where you are calling from and never make a claim, let *them assume* you are an attorney or a paralegal. I think compliance with your rights will go up tremendously.

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
  275. What does it say in the contract? by mr3038 · · Score: 1

    You signed a contract before starting in the job, right? Just check what it says. Where I live, the usual announcement time before leaving is one month. The company gets one month advance warning that you're leaving and you get the pay for that month. Bigger companies usually don't take any risks and once you announce that you're leaving, you're told that your presence is no longer required but you'll get paid for the last month anyway. Smaller companies expect you to stay for the last month working.

    A well written contract also clearly defines what happens if you or the employer try to deviate from the contract. Sometimes it could be possible to leave the old job immediately and pay the penalty defined in the contract and still have good recommendations from your old employer. It's possible because the old employer gets compensated for your early leave.

    --
    _________________________
    Spelling and grammar mistakes left as an exercise for the reader.
  276. Burning bridges.... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    ... is perfectly wise thing to do, specially if the bridge you are burning is not the only one if town.

    I don't understand why people are so concerned about burning bridges. Do they all live in a town with only one of them or what?

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  277. Stick It Out and Get Your Due by standbypowerguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was in a similar situation a few years ago, when I was wooed by a competitor offering a superior position, but only a modest salary increase. I gave my then-current employer the opportunity to match the salary and open up an avenue for advancement (my position at the time was a dead end, and I had risen to the top of the salary matrix), but they declined. So I gave them the customary two weeks' notice.

    It was like pushing the "nasty behavior" button. They immediately confiscated my company truck and tools (did they think I would take them with me to the new job?), then asked me to serve out my final two weeks assisting another engineer (stripped of responsibility as punishment... vindictive bastards, they were). I guess they figured I'd quit and forfeit my accrued vacation. Fat chance!

    I took the high road, politely explained that I had important support tasks scheduled at other engineers' facilities (I was a roving specialist) and offered to use my personal vehicle and tools. Of course, I submitted vouchers for mileage, which they were required to pay per company policy. At the end of it all, I was paid everything due me, including vacation time, and had the satisfaction of leaving on a high note, with the respect of my peers and associates.

    I'd advise you to do the same. Take the high road, be profesional, and stick it out. If they give you any crap over compensation, haul them before your locale's version of the National Labor Relations Board.

    --
    This isn't the sig you're looking for... Move along.
  278. Make business sense and make this work for you by nefarious.method · · Score: 1

    Moral battles will not help you get your money AND look good will they? How about a practical solution. Most business managers although not connected with reality can readily understand business finance at a basic level. If you can demonstrate that by not working with you and giving you your paycheck you will negatively affect the bottom line - you win. Here's how. Find a suitable replacement. Easiset way in this case would be to post on a relevant mailing list and you'll probably get several competent reponses. Say that you are responsible for the hiring (your boss said you are and you are) and ask nicely for resumes. Go to your boss and say that you performed an exhaustive search of candidates and you've narrowed it down to these finalists (the mailing list submissions). Talk to the boss in a really excited manner and tell him you have found the perfect replacement and you wish to talk! ( add !! as neccesary. Each ! is 10 decibels). Come to the meeting with resumes in hand. Also make the meeting at the end of the day so it will sink in what a favor you've done. Then nicely and pragmatically tell him that you are concerned you are not going to get paid and if he will kindly give you the paycheck now you will be happy to go over the canidates right now. The sooner the better because they need notice and you need to train them before you leave. It's all about the win win.

  279. But in Texas, ... by gosand · · Score: 1
    If you live in texas you are in reasonably good shape on the final paycheck thing.
    Hell, in Texas you can probably shoot his ass for pulling shit like that.

    But in Texas, he probably could have shot you for quitting. Touche, hombre. Yeeee-hhaaaa. *pow* *pow* *pow*

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  280. honesty by awb131 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'd say honesty is the best policy.

    Something like: "You know, fellow co-workers, I like most of you and have enjoyed working with you. Except you (points), you're an idiot, and you (points again) you're a douchebag. I have been offered an extra twenty thousand dollars a year to work in an environment that is less fun, and I'm going to take it. Good luck figuring out what all those little scripts in my ~/bin directory do. If you can't figure it out, feel free to give me a call. Except you (points.)"

    You'll still be on good terms with anybody who matters.

    --
    "There is no night so forlorn, no mood so bleak, that it cannot be infused with pleasure by tender meat..." - R.W. Apple
  281. ahh third party by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 1
    My mistake. Just recalled that a lot of the fancy eavesdropping/spy equipment you can buy have warnings all over them about the potential legal implications. But that's third party eavesdropping as well.

    My mistake, thanks for clarifying Mr Hudson.

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
  282. #include creative_headline.h by http101 · · Score: 1

    Finding a replacement is NOT your job duty. That's why they have this little department called, "Human Resources". They keep a record of who's best outfitted for certain positions. Once they interview with you or your boss (more likely), he should be the person to choose your replacement.

    As for holding your final paycheck, that's bullshit. I don't know what state you live in, but my state law requires an employer to pay an employee within 10 days of the end of the work week. If your boss is serious about retaining your final check, I'd seek legal advice - there could be more money in it for you than you think! *wink*

    I once had a coworker who decided to leave a job on a bad note. He got into an involved arguement with the boss (a guy) in his boss' office (door closed). From what we heard outside, he was using severe profanity involving his boss, his boss' wife, and a goat, but ended up with my coworker showing his boss exactly "what he was bringing to the party". With all said and pants down on his desk, he somehow managed to keep his job. It kinda makes me wonder about his boss now...

    --
    -- Game Developers: Stop porting badly-textured games from crappy console systems!
  283. Act like a particle. by levin · · Score: 1

    My general philosophy when it comes to dealing with bosses/jobs is something like this: act like a particle. That means, find the lowest energy possible and sit there unless something, a new job for instance, fires you up (this doesn't apply to when you're actually working, of course).

    Pretty much every boss I've had has been gracious about it, but if your old boss is making it difficult to leave on good terms, act like a particle. It's easier to just let it slide; not only that, but it's better too, and here's why: If your boss is really that nutso, you probably don't want to work for him again anyway. As for your co-workers and the company's clients, well, like you said, they know he's nuts too and I don't think they'll hold his idosyncrasies against you.

    --

    `which fortune`
  284. what is it with you and the jail thing? by No-op · · Score: 1

    ...Seriously. I can only speculate that something really bad happened to you, to be so fixated on that.

    your advice about not intentionally pissing the guy off is very valid, but I do think that the best suggestion is to let the boss know in very calm terms that he is legally obligated to pay out the paycheck within (state-specific) time period of the pay date.

    additionally, given that the US primarily operates under an "at will" employment model, if you feel like walking out you certainly can. it's not like the boss has to take your feelings into consideration if he decides to downsize you.

    I think the best bet is to try to make it clear to the boss about how you're leaving, that you want things to go smoothly for everyone- but make sure he's aware that YOU are aware of your rights as laid down by law. Maybe he's the owner and whatnot but doesn't really know what the rules are? it might be good to make sure he knows the deal, and that quite a few actions on his part can really go against him in the long run.

    the law is typically on your side as the employee; take advantage of it.

    and I think you can probably disregard the possibility of being picked up on a warrant, unless you live in podunk, nebraska. when it gets "local" then the law is usually second to "kin". if that's the situation, then try moving to a larger city. really. we have better food and everything :)

    --
    EOM
    1. Re:what is it with you and the jail thing? by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 1

      ...Seriously. I can only speculate that something really bad happened to you, to be so fixated on that.

      I've seen people green warranted, I've seen them picked up on charges that should have never been filed. I've seen people, while I was working in treatment, that ended up inside when they shouldn't. While rare, it happens, and it is not something that can always be straightened out immediately. For that person, it can be like living in a Hitchcock movie, where you're innocent, but you can't prove it until they let you.

      I've never had it happen to me, it's one of those cases of having worked with the system and having been close enough to have seen it happen. It's not something that happens all the time, but it happens, and when it does, you won't be out in an hour and back to work.

      I'm basically pointing out a worst case scenario to illustrate that while someone's issues are not your problem, their actions when they overreact to you could be your serious problem.

    2. Re:what is it with you and the jail thing? by No-op · · Score: 1

      Pointing out the worst case scenarios of things usually means you're actually thinking actions through, before acting on them. that's a good trait to have.

      When you look at some of the other posters, you realize that quite a few of them are the sort that would start taking down servers and destroying data the minute they found out they lost their job. you kiddies need to learn to behave yourselves! it comes back to bite you in the ass when you do stupid stuff.

      Ironically, I have a friend who worked at Enron, and oddly enough all the people committing massive fraud there have by and large escaped scott-free. go figure.

      --
      EOM
    3. Re:what is it with you and the jail thing? by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 1

      I've noticed a lot of responses show people have not thought things through. I've also seen a lot of responses in this topic that show posters think as long as they're right or the boss is wrong, everything will work out and they can do what they want.

      They seem ignorant of the fact that the boss can do some nasty things, even if they're wrong, make things miserable for a departing employee, and even drag out giving him a check, and still avoid actually getting into trouble -- even when everything he's done is "wrong." It just doesn't pay to have anyone angry at you -- especially when they can do bad things to you. This idea that if you're right, you'll always win and come out ahead really only works on Toon Disney and Saturday Morning 'toons.

  285. Do you work for... by KnarfO · · Score: 1

    this guy, by chance? :-)

    --


    "Creativity is allowing ones self to make mistakes. Art is knowing which ones to keep" - Scott Adams
  286. Wiretap Laws. by naught · · Score: 1


    for the record, these vary from state to state. in my home state, you don't have do have someone's permission before recording them over the phone. the way the law is written, one party has to know the phone call is being recorded, not both.

    fyi.

    --
    -- build a man a fire and he'll be warm all day. set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:Wiretap Laws. by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      We're not dealing with phone conversations in this context, so whether the state is a single-notify or all-notify is irrerlevant -)

      We can thank hollywood for the right to record people in public w/o their consent - they used to have to get releases from everyone who was even accidently caught on camera - not any more.

  287. NDAs by thelizman · · Score: 1

    Most NDAs here in the states are non-compete agreements. The only time you have to worry about an NDA is when you disclose trade secrets in a manner that directly harms your (former) employers ability to profit in the market. Simply telling someone something is insufficient; your breach can only be actionable in the event that actual damages are inflicted.

    As to the "stick it to 'em" argument; nobody is advocating that. However, it is within his best interest to retain documentation which can establish his performance.

    Also, the happy go lucky mentality you ascribe is not a reality in the American corporate world. Business is not about 'networking', it's about competition and marketshare. In this case, his boss is already 'trash talking' him, and legitimate reasons notwithstanding he has to protect his own interests in this matter.

    Good intentions don't go nearly half as far as good measures.

    1. Re:NDAs by sherriw · · Score: 1

      Ah.. I wasn't aware that American NDAs are non-compete agreements. In Canada non-competes try to tell you that you can't get another job in the same industry. That doesn't fly with the courts because it would lock employees into a job, even if it was a bad job.

      The Canadian business ecomomy and the American one are closely related. We are tied together and the ethics issues are nearly identical. I'm not advocating being happy-go-lucky, and I DO feel that he should defend himself. Just don't do anything that will make you look bad or burn bridges.

      From the post he implied that he was not a business owner or manager but an employee. Therefore competition and market share are less his concerns... and his reputation, skills, and how well he can 'sell himself' as a valuable asset ARE his concerns. If he takes some kind of reactionary response, it will knock one long term job reference off his resume. It's not worth it- especially since he's leaving to better things soon.

    2. Re:NDAs by thelizman · · Score: 1
      I wasn't aware that American NDAs are non-compete agreements.

      To be absolutely technical, they're not. But constantly say "Non-Disclosure Non-Compete" doesn't roll off the tongue like say "endeay". The standard corporate NDNCA outlines things like confidentiality expectations between the two parties, the presumed agreement to not use divulged secrets against the discloser on the part of the disclosee, and so on. But as I was saying, they are essentially junk documents that are signed and made to be signed as a matter of course in order to establish a quasi-legal relationship between employer and employee. Later, the employer will use them to threaten the employee. In truth, I don't use NDAs with my employees or contracters. You either trust them, or you don't, and if you don't trust them you don't give them access to trade secrets (of which there are none).

      I used NDAs, of all places, with my customers, and I use them more as a marketing tool first, a legal protection second. If I had a customer go blab to another customer about the great deal they got, it's usually not a big deal for me. However, I have done special favors for certain individuals at well below market price in order to get their business, or in a few cases because I really wanted to give to the community. If others got wind of those loss leaders, I'd be hard pressed to justify my pricing structure, and I would invariably be caused actual damages.

      And I totally agree about the 'not burning bridges' part, and was in no way intending to advocate that. But business is business, and he is right to take advantage of every legal opportunity available to him to advance. Morally, he shouldn't do it at someone elses expense, but individual labor is a free market. Patronage died at the same time three martini lunches, guaranteed pensions, and job stability died. If he can lure employees away with better pay, fringe benefits, options, flexible work environments, or anything else than that is business.
  288. Try to save your good will, but there are limits: by Systems+Curmudgeon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's a small world and you never know when you're going to run into the same people again. It's worth almost every decent effort to be cooperative and helpful, to try to end your current job with a good conscience.

    Confronting your boss is very risky. There's only one way I would recommend if you have to - insist on a meeting with your boss AND his boss to plan how you will best use your remaining time (and while you're at it, make your case that you're being a good employee). Bear in mind that as a departing employee, you are actually providing your company the service of being able to blame things on you rather than look in the mirror. As a consultant I've faced this a lot, and I just regard it as one of the things I'm paid for (see below). Don't let it get to you.

    NEXT time you change jobs, here are some pieces of advice:
    (1) Don't tell anyone at work about your new job until you start it and decide how you like it. (2) Give as little notice as you decently can, rarely more than two weeks. Longer notice opens you up as a longterm target.
    (3) Think about negotiating a "reciprocal notice" clause, something I've managed to do for 20 years. The idea is that the amount of notice you are required to give the company is the same that they are require to give you, be it one hour, two weeks or whatever; the more security they give you, the more you give them.
    (4) Since we always sign agreements about proprietary property (which tend to be vaguely written in favor of the employer), it's a good idea when you change jobs to change to a somewhat different field, to avoid charges you are taking knowledge with you. Your boss of course has no right to withhold your paycheck for any grounds whatsoever. If you're worried about a real problem here, get copies of all relevant company policy BEFORE your last day. It will be much harder after you leave the company. Make it gently clear to the company president, if they actually try to withhold your paycheck, that you will be contacting your senator, a lawyer, and the relevant state regulatory boards (even though such boards probably do not exist) and that the time they spend dealing with you will be a much greater waste than paying you. E.g., "If you try to illegally withhold my paycheck, you're going to wind up spending an awful lot of time responding to queries by the government and all the relevant regulatory agencies I find. Heck I might even have to get a lawyer if we part on bad terms, I'd to do that. Why not pay me now instead of wasting all that precious time?"

    If they try to make you sign something before you leave, you almost have to insist that you show it to an intellectual property lawyer before you sign; believe me, the stakes will be too high. If they are offering your $50,000 or more, take it or leave it, to sign without a lawyer, it might be worth it.

    Finally, here's an example of how I was paid to be the "dumped on" person in one job. My main responsibility was to write the user documentation telling the customer how to operate the system. For years after I left this job, I ran into people who knew I had "failed" in this. The reason I wrote no user documentation at all was that there were no specs for this system, it never got out of the design phase, there was no running software, and no one could tell me what the user screens were going to look like! When told I failed to document this system, I just smile.

    http://precision-blogging.blogspot.com/

  289. Sugar is sometimes sweeter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had a boss who wigged out on me whenever I tried to get another position in the same company. We were required by HR to inform our current boss of pending interviews. Within a day after informing him, he would always go have an "off-the-record chat" with the prospective new boss and ask that I not be hired, explain how I could not possibly do the job, or other devious tricks. He had over 40 years with the company, so he had some clout. And everyone knew he was a bit bonkers himself, but that didn't seem to matter. I tried talking with HR and all the other formal BS to no avail. The next step was legal action.

    A friend suggested to go off the deep end and try something completely different. So I did. I was going into his office to tell him about my next inhouse interview, and started by thanking him for being the best mentor on the face of the earth - ever. I listed a few new skills I developed while under his management and attributed them directly to him. I commented on everything positive about the department I could possibly think of. I then told him that because of how much growing I had done while under his wing, I was ready to take the next step in my career path. I asked him if the new position would be a good step in the right direction (it was). I handed him a little "manual" that contained all the information I thought someone taking my place would possibly need, the little things that are unwritten, but highly useful. I and ended the conversation with how lucky I thought my replacement would be to get the same opportunities as I, should I get the new position.

    Believe it or not.... it worked. He even went to the prospective new boss to give a glowing recomendation in person. As best as I could figure, he didn't want to find a replacement or do training. I also think he felt that my wanting to leave was implying that he was incompetent; because if I was happy working for him, I would not be seeking employment elsewhere. Go figure.

  290. Moderators where are you ? by sbeashwar · · Score: 0

    This is a repeat, we didn't ask for an encore :-)

  291. 1,000 lines of Perl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "... could have been replaced by 1,000 lines of Perl."

    Are you kidding? A thousand lines of perl could launch a space shuttle, and do the accounting for the astronauts' paychecks to boot!
    Is there anything that COULDN'T be done in 1,000 lines of perl? But maintenance would be a nightmare.

  292. two sides to every story... by vincecooks · · Score: 1

    ...remember? all we have heard is one version of the "truth". The "boss" might have a very different version of reality to share. Or not...

  293. Don't devalue yourself by nicomp · · Score: 1

    You devalue yourself if you react to his behavior. You know what's right and wrong, don't use his unprofessional actions to justify what you choose to do.

  294. Oh, really by phorm · · Score: 1

    Step a) Disable command Logging
    Step b) Sleep 259200 && rm -rf /

    1. Re:Oh, really by alienw · · Score: 1

      You don't seem to get it. A disgruntled sysadmin leaves. 3 days later something strange happens to the server. The FBI is contacted. They ask "did you have any disgruntled employees leave lately?". The boss says "yes". It doesn't take much investigation to put the two together. Disgruntled sysadmin ends up in federal court and goes to jail.

  295. Lawyers fees by phorm · · Score: 1

    A lot of people seem to overlook this:

    When you seeking damages, you can in fact include the cost of seeking damages (lawyers fees,etc). Many judges will recognise the cost of litigation, and if you are in the right you might get your wage, your costs, and possibly even "damages" which basically pay your time and serve as a penalty to discourage further idiocy of a similar type in the future.

  296. Investigation by phorm · · Score: 1

    It does take proof however, to put somebody behinds bars. And the likelyhood of a large investigation really is relative to the size/money of the business (and/or the connections of those who run it).

    I think people just put too much stake in the law. It's not the law that keeps a large portion of people honest, it's good sense and proper values.

    Even if I knew I could get away with it I wouldn't sabotage my current employer when I leave... why:

    a) Rumours are good at burning beyond even bridges
    b) Current co-workers would have to fix the mess
    c) New guy would have a hell of a time fixing the mess

    And really in the end it doesn't get me ahead anyhow...

    1. Re:Investigation by alienw · · Score: 1

      Well, it depends. The only really good way to cover your tracks is to make it look like the failure was caused by something else (such as bad hardware). The problem is, they can take you to court without much evidence. The feds have a 90-95% conviction rate, so you better have a pretty damn good lawyer, which is quite expensive. Once you are in court, you've pretty much lost -- whether you get convicted or not. As you've pointed out, it's unlikely to improve your relationship with your current employer.

  297. Re:My two cents... (correction) by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1
    What you and I see as a challenge, the boss very likely will see as an attack.

    He doesn't see it as an attack. He sees it as a threat.

    In your example, the fact that you didn't just roll over and take the blame meant that you might just look more closely into what happened -- and then find out that he'd done it. The easiest way to prevent things like that happening is to train you to just roll over and take the blame -- then after N months of taking the blame, you either learn to expertly cover for him, or you get fired for incompetence, and he gets a new admin who gets similarly trained...

    I'm guessing that he does a least some of that unconsciously.

    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.