Slashdot Mirror


Walmart Ships PCs with Lindows OS

Tonetheman writes "Walmart is now shipping low cost PC's with Lindows pre-installed. And yes I know there was a review earlier on Slashdot about installing Linux on one of these bad boys. This is different and much more exciting. To think of the legions of rednecks who could now possibly be running Lindows instead of Windows..." There's a Newsforge story too. Hopefully Lindows makes a good impression.

936 comments

  1. Rage against the conformity. by Big+Dogs+Cock · · Score: 2, Funny

    Trolling in the name of
    Some of those that boot Suse
    Are the same that bought XP
    Some of those that boot Suse
    Are the same that bought XP
    Trolling in the name of
    And now you run what they told you
    And now you run what they told you
    And now you run what they told you

    95 is justified for running the games that you didn't buy
    95 is justified for running the games that you didn't buy
    Some of those that boot Suse
    Are the same that bought XP
    Some of those that boot Suse
    Are the same that bought XP

    And you run what they told you
    Now your under control
    And you run what they told you
    Now your under control
    And you run what they told you
    Come on!

    Fuck you I wont run what you tell me
    Fuck you I wont run what you tell me
    Fuck you I wont run what you tell me
    Fuck you I wont run what you tell me
    Motherfucker

    --
    "Under the iron bridge, we fist" - The Smiths, Still Ill
    1. Re:Rage against the conformity. by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1

      You CAN buy a PC without paying the Microsoft tax! Rejoice, the relvolution has begun! Down with the King!

      --
      How ya like dat?
    2. Re:Rage against the conformity. by Bahamuto · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Man I wish I had mod points... I don't know why but I havn't had mod points for the longest time. Oh well great song!!

    3. Re:Rage against the conformity. by Pinball+Wizard · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      do you get asked to metamod every day? If not, you've been $rtbl'd. No mod points for you...ever.

      --

      No, Thursday's out. How about never - is never good for you?

    4. Re:Rage against the conformity. by GutBomb · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      i have never even once had mod points or been asked to metamod. and i have been around for a long time too. karma at 50, not a troll... i don't get it. Oh well. karma not at 50 anymore in a few minutes.

    5. Re:Rage against the conformity. by Pinball+Wizard · · Score: 1
      ya know, i didn't look at your UID. you have to wait until there is a 10% increase in users before you can start moderating. I don't think its up to the 590,000's yet. You will probably start getting mod points in the near future since you've never trolled.


      I on the other hand have been $rtbl'd, so this account will probably never see mod points again.

      --

      No, Thursday's out. How about never - is never good for you?

    6. Re:Rage against the conformity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what we learn from this, always troll anon (even if it's just a simple fp)

    7. Re:Rage against the conformity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EVERYONE should be able to metamod. However, there was a bug at one point that you had to access the metamod script manually once before you could metamod. Once I did this, I could metamod every day, and started getting mod points sometimes, too.
      The url is http://slashdot.org/metamod.pl

    8. Re:Rage against the conformity. by GutBomb · · Score: 1

      You are currently not eligible to Meta Moderate.
      Return to the Slashdot homepage.

      bummer

  2. Lindows? Is it ready? by drdata.nl · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I though that it was still in beta, aren't they afraid of claims for 'not functioning like windows, despite the misleading name'?

    1. Re:Lindows? Is it ready? by T.Monk · · Score: 2, Funny

      well, it's beta, and they want the windows demographic, so it would follow that they would ship while still in beta... hey, if MS does it, it's gotta be right, eh?

    2. Re:Lindows? Is it ready? by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      The suit MS filed over the Lindows name was thrown out, so they can be a little more bold.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    3. Re:Lindows? Is it ready? by rector · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They don't care about claims. They just say the the OS runs MOST Windows programs. This means that if the end user cannot run any particular Windows program (or even 100 programs), they always can say that there are 2 (or 200) programs out there that run perfectly (Noty to mention that most programs in general are rather basic comparing to big packages most people use.)

    4. Re:Lindows? Is it ready? by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 0, Troll

      The funny part is that in beta it's probally more stable than Windoze is in it's final release. The other thing is that if you're buying your computer at Wal-Mart, then odds are that you could be handed a Macintrash, be told that it runs windows, and you wouldn't know the difference.

    5. Re:Lindows? Is it ready? by Alsee · · Score: 4, Insightful

      aren't they afraid of claims for 'not functioning like windows

      It isn't windows.
      If what you expect Genuine Windows then BUY Genuine Windows.

      Hopefully the good differences will be better than the bad differences, but there is a difference. I've never used it, so I don't know if it's "ready".

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    6. Re:Lindows? Is it ready? by bluethundr · · Score: 1

      "then odds are that you could be handed a Macintrash, be told that it runs windows, and you wouldn't know the difference." Except that current macs are shipping with OS X. A BSD / mach kernel based (yeah, I know. overhead, blah, blah. but i still think it rocks) that is centuries ahead of anything out of Redmond and decades ahead of "Lindows" (cool as I still think the Lindows project is).

      --
      Quod scripsi, scripsi.
    7. Re:Lindows? Is it ready? by packeteer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      im afriad that a beta might not give a good impression to users who may buy it thinking its some cheap windows clone... major labels are cloned everywhere else so why not computers?... i can amagine there are going to be some angry people when they get it home and realise it's NOT windows... Lindows need to be exposed better for this to work but i think this is one way to get that exposure... kinda a catch-22

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    8. Re:Lindows? Is it ready? by daddymac · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It isn't windows.
      If what you expect Genuine Windows then BUY Genuine Windows.

      Ah, but when someone goes into WalMart and says "Does this run Windows?", the Sales Rep. is more than likely going to be one of two people:
      1. The kind who says "No, it runs Lindows, but Lindows can run all of the Windows Programs, so they're basically the same."
      2. The kind who thinks is actually is Windows, because they have never used a computer other than the cash register and says "Yeah, it runs Windows." and goes back to dusting off TVs.

      I would be really impressed if Lindows actually ran MOST Windows software as the ad claims. I would be even more impressed if the "Windows software" they are talking about only includes the latest productivity and entertainment software. I wouldn't be impressed if "MOST" refers to old Windows 3.1 games and MSPAINT.EXE.

      --
      If something I said can be interpreted two ways, and one of the ways makes you sad or angry, I meant the other one.
    9. Re:Lindows? Is it ready? by DrCode · · Score: 5, Funny

      "They just say the the OS runs MOST Windows programs."

      The same is true of 'genuine' Windows.

      But I do wonder how well Lindows does when you stick a random Win32 app. CD in. My experience with WINE (up to a few months ago) has been generally bad.

    10. Re:Lindows? Is it ready? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then tell me again why it is so damn slow? i have trouble seeing an os as "centuries ahead of anything out of Redmond" when it has problems doing things such as scrolling text smoothly. i've spent most of my time waiting for software to be backported to this abomination, only to discover to my disappointment that it runs many many times faster on my comparably clocked windows machine.

      (Tibook 667mhz/512mb OSX 10.2DP , Sony Vaio SR17k 700mhz/128mb Windows 2000)

    11. Re:Lindows? Is it ready? by tjw · · Score: 2, Interesting
      From the Walmart page:
      This exciting new OS delivers the stability of UNIX with the ease of Windows and the ability to run most Microsoft programs.
      Microsoft programs are only a small subset of Windows (Win32) programs. I assume Lindows claims to support Microsoft programs like Office, MS Money, Frontpage, etc.
      --

      XJS*C4JDBQADN1.NSBN3*2IDNEN*GTUBE-STANDARD-ANTI-UB E-TEST-EMAIL*C.34X
    12. Re:Lindows? Is it ready? by mark_lybarger · · Score: 1

      yeah, it runs windows. it runs X-windows, and even lots of applications for M$ windows. the "does it run windows? question could happen for any distro being pre-installed. fact is, most people won't even ask someone because the "sales reps" (shelf stockers) at the walmart stores are less than knowledgeable and less than friendly.

      sure, some people will take it home and hook it up and find that the games they got at best-buy don't work so well in it. they might even take it back. then there are those who will never now any better.

    13. Re:Lindows? Is it ready? by neuroticia · · Score: 1

      That's different. Microsoft has an established market presence, and they gained a following with DOS before they started pitching foul balls left and right with the thingy we know as Windows.

      If the first experience the public has with a new OS is not entirely pleasant, they will not allow it to replace Windows. It doesn't matter if the OS is more powerful, better, or only "just as buggy" as Windows, if it is not 200% better then they will claim it is faulty. Remember--Linux tends to not have some of the click-and-go things that Windows has, and I'm sure Lindows follows suit. Since the first time you sit down at a new computer you try to use it the way you used your last computer--unless you realize that there are some major differences you'll walk away thinking that there are only major flaws, and bring the computer back to Walmart.

      In order for people to migrate to something different there has to be incredible incentive. I just don't see that happening with a beta of Lindows. A finished functional Lindows, yes. But shipping a beta is just going to end up coming back around and kicking them in the rear.

      -Sara

    14. Re:Lindows? Is it ready? by Unregistered · · Score: 0, Troll

      But noprmal Wine can run a hella lot non-M$ apps. Its just the M$ apps and hidden APIs that wine doesn't do at all.

    15. Re:Lindows? Is it ready? by LowellPorter · · Score: 0, Troll


      Not functioning like Windows?? Since When has Windows functioned?

    16. Re:Lindows? Is it ready? by Alsee · · Score: 4, Interesting

      who thinks is actually is Windows

      Apologies, I shouldn't have said "Genuine Windows", I should have said "Genuine Microsoft Windows".

      This issue has been decided in court. Microsoft Windows is a trademark of Microsoft. Windows is a generic term. Lindows is a trademark of... ummm... someone else (chuckle).

      If a salesman or anyone else indicates that Lindows is Microsoft Windows then they are at fault. Complain to the store. Get a refund. Sue them if need be. It is not Lindow's responsibility.

      P.S.
      impressed if Lindows actually ran MOST Windows software
      Yes, exactly what it does/doesn't run is an interesting question.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    17. Re:Lindows? Is it ready? by marmoset · · Score: 1

      You do of course realize that you're comparing the performance of a pre-release OS complete, with debug code (you're breaking your NDA, btw) to a relased product, don't you?

    18. Re:Lindows? Is it ready? by notdanielp · · Score: 1

      Actually it says it runs most Microsoft programs. IIRC wine does a lot better with MS Office than it does with Monster Truck Madness.

      --
      The president has been kidnapped by ninjas!
      Are you a bad enough dude to rescue the president?
    19. Re:Lindows? Is it ready? by colmore · · Score: 3, Funny

      with the Walmart demographic, that might be a serious problem.

      We should start testing Deerhunter and such on Lindows and Wine!

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    20. Re:Lindows? Is it ready? by LowellPorter · · Score: 0, Troll

      Not functioning like Windows?? Since When has Windows functioned?

      Whoever modded me a Troll apparently didn't see my attempt at humor or doesn't have a sense of humor.

    21. Re:Lindows? Is it ready? by Dakkus · · Score: 1

      "These computers do not ship with Microsoft Windows. They ship with an exciting new UNIX based Operating System (OS) named Lindows. This exciting new OS delivers the stability of UNIX with the ease of Windows and the ability to run most Microsoft programs. These computer systems are a perfect low cost alternative to computers preloaded with Microsoft Windows."

      This is what can be read on walmart's ad.
      It doesn't say you can run most windows apps. Instead it says that you can run most microsoft apps. Every M$windows-program isn't made by M$ itself. In example Corel Draw is made by Corel, which isn't quite the same thing as Microsoft, isn't it?

    22. Re:Lindows? Is it ready? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lindows looks like a cheap knockoff. Hope MS crushes lindows company.

      GOOOOOOO MICROSOFT!

    23. Re:Lindows? Is it ready? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's nowhere near ready... I'm an "Insider" and claim that from personal experience. I installed it on my 100% linux compatible box, and it was flaky as hell, and that's being nice.

      I think their name is going to come back and bite them in the ass too - It doesn't run one damn Win32 proggie flawlessy - Not ONE! Some say Office runs pretty well, excluding access, but I couldn't even get that to install.

      They say they have improved WINE, and even others vouch for this, but it appears to me to eb the same as it was before they started tinkering with it.

      This is going to backfire big time.

      -Brian

    24. Re:Lindows? Is it ready? by mikestp01 · · Score: 1

      Remember what Microsoft did to OS/2? They changed Windows 3.1 to windows 3.11 and broke the ability for OS/2 to run windows 3.11. They did this in a manner that simply changed a few things so it would no longer act as a Hosted virtual operating system under the virtual dos mode of OS/2. No other reason to change anything other than to make it non functional under Warp. They can and will do the same. They don't even need to change much in the operating system. They can do so with a simple update to .net or office and achieve the same results. OS/2 could have supported all the Win 32 stuff in Windows 95/98/me as well, but IBM knuckled under to Microsoft and it never got published (code was available). One other area of concern is how will third party software produces react to a support call when the client tells them they are running under lindows rather than Windows? In the past with OS/2, when you had an issue with a third party package, you got the standard rutine "We don't support our package under anything but windows products". In other words, if the support staff of the third party software vendors can take an easy way out, they will... There is something to be said about an end user getting help with a windows problem from a neighbour who is familiar with windows. However that same help resource is currently not available for Lindows...... I wish them (and anyone who has the balls to take on Microsoft and the general industry....), however IBM could not do it in 1995..... And in my opinion OS/2 was far ahead technically than either the current Linux or Windows.... Even today there are features in Warp that are not yet realised in either Linux or windows.... OS/2 was by far the only operating system that came close to rocking the windows boat.....

    25. Re:Lindows? Is it ready? by Verizon+Guy · · Score: 1

      We should start testing Deerhunter and such on Lindows and Wine!

      Hahaha... they should quality test Lindows in a trailer home, while they're at it!

      --

      Aw, fuck it. Let's go bowling. - The Big Lebowski

    26. Re:Lindows? Is it ready? by Verizon+Guy · · Score: 1

      The funny thing about that is that it's not UNIX-based. GNU/OS is a UNIX-alike, but alas, not UNIX per se.

      --

      Aw, fuck it. Let's go bowling. - The Big Lebowski

    27. Re:Lindows? Is it ready? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you're just a prickhole.

    28. Re:Lindows? Is it ready? by rseuhs · · Score: 2
      Well, I guess the Win32-part (aka Wine) part of Lindows is beta, I see no reason why the standard KDE/Linux part plus OpenOffice should be unstable.

      And grandma doesn't play Max Payne anyway, so those who only need email/web/office will be set, IMO.

    29. Re:Lindows? Is it ready? by rseuhs · · Score: 2
      This whole GNU and Linux is not Unix stuff is like saying a Ford is no car because it's no Mercedes-Benz (who invented the car).

      Linux looks like Unix, it acts like Unix, it feels like Unix. It is Unix for all respects that matter.

    30. Re:Lindows? Is it ready? by Verizon+Guy · · Score: 1

      No, it's more like saying a Ford isn't a Mercedes-Benz because... well, it isn't!

      --

      Aw, fuck it. Let's go bowling. - The Big Lebowski

    31. Re:Lindows? Is it ready? by MrDolby · · Score: 1

      "You do of course realize that you're comparing the performance of a pre-release OS complete, with debug code (you're breaking your NDA, btw) to a relased product, don't you? "

      You do realize that the poster is comparing OS X to Win2000, and not Lindows to Win2000.

    32. Re:Lindows? Is it ready? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      look, winblows is the front of EVIL. anyone willing to fight this unspeakable malace, deserves to know the speed of pure linux-based environments. especially since most peole do not know anything about how an OS works, they won't know the difference. buying winblows will just force the newbes into a mold of disallisions that "the glowing box for video games" can't be something better. if you can't see that, you need to pull what is unworthy of your soul and throw it into the abyss.

      additionly, i applaud those who acknowledge that wine is still in beta. most people, DO have a very hard time with it cooperating with such basic titles as Diablo II and the like. installation SHOULD be simpler; re-compeletion is never easy.

      also, yes linux != windows. but their is one big difference--$$$. linux is virtually free, while the spurnge of bane charges $100+ for basic services. the more linux-based systems will put linux in the eyes of the more predominate developers, and they will produce mainstream programs compatible with it. simple supply/demand ideas.

    33. Re:Lindows? Is it ready? by unitron · · Score: 2
      "Some say Office runs pretty well, excluding access, but I couldn't even get that to install."

      They just said it runs most MS stuff, they didn't say anything about being able to install it. :-)

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    34. Re:Lindows? Is it ready? by mrmez · · Score: 1

      why would they mind that lindows isn't functioning, like windows?
      they don't seem to mind that windows isn't functioning.

    35. Re:Lindows? Is it ready? by 1155 · · Score: 1

      I hate to say it, but those who have heard of lindows are pretty much it. Those who haven't obviously don't shop at walmart.com, if you catch my drift. They don't go to slashdot.org, they are not impressed with rock hard stability, they just want something that will run the sims for their kids, will let them look at pr0n, and then be able to shut off the machine at night when the family guy comes on or something. Those who care about linux or lindows probably won't be buying these as well.

      My question is still, where is the lindows source, where are the binaries, and will the gpl be flashed across the screen of these new machines before they are able to access it, because there is no way they will see it otherwise.

    36. Re:Lindows? Is it ready? by marmoset · · Score: 1

      OS X 10.2 DP (i.e. a Developer Preview release),
      which is (a) still under development, with debug code (b) covered by NDA.

  3. Since rednecks can't spell anyway.. by wackybrit · · Score: 0, Troll

    To think of the legions of rednecks who could now possibly be running Lindows instead of Windows...

    Rednecks can't spell anyway, so they probably think it's exactly the same as what they had previously.

  4. Haha..... by cp4 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Legions of rednecks killed me!

    You know you're a redneck if: you run Lindows on a WalMart PC.

    1. Re:Haha..... by TheKubrix · · Score: 1

      hey now, even hillbillies deserve open source!

    2. Re:Haha..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      it's totally acceptable in polite society, provided the object of ridicule is an oppressor rather than the oppressed.

      remember the saying, "afflict the comfortable, comfort the afflicted".

    3. Re:Haha..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other words, white males are exempt from protection under Political Correctness? Gee, what a surprise.

    4. Re:Haha..... by Quinn · · Score: 1, Troll

      I never have mod points when I need them.

      The parent isn't flamebait at all, you politically correct fuckhole of a moderator.

      --
      #19845
    5. Re:Haha..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Open Source has always been for hillbilles and oakies with 486 machines found in the goodwill dumpster -- Look at Eric Raymond.

      (Note also how he is obsessed with redefining the word 'cracker'. Because he is one! Ha Ha.)

    6. Re:Haha..... by Quinn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Except that poor "culturally deprived" whites aren't the oppressors. They're just as much disenfranchised "victims" as poor "culturally different" [sic] blacks.

      Frankly, the usage of "redneck" in this case is classically racist! The author has no knowledge whatsoever of the individuals purchasing these computers, and is making broad generalizations as to what types of people shop at Walmart. (I suppose the "niggers" shop at K-Mart, eh?)

      It would be more appropriate and acceptable to yell "Fucking goddamned nigger!" at a baggy-pants black youth crossing on a green light. Or if it was a dumpy white lady, "You fucking fat-ass bitch!" Or an Asian, "Me rikey you go faster, cross walk long time!!"

      Cultural hot-words can be used to express displeasure with an /individual/ without making one a racist.

      However, the article summary's use of "redneck" lambasts the very market most Linux zealots pretend to want to conquer -- the common working man. And it appears it was done merely as a way to demean other people via the use of a loophole in politically correct dogma.

      heehheeh lomaolf!!!!

      --
      #19845
    7. Re:Haha..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I totally agree. Equal rights is a two way street.
      To bad it's en vogue to trash white people. Damn racists.

    8. Re:Haha..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah yes, the poor oppressed white people, denied the good jobs, forced to drive the older cards, forced to live in the bad neighborhoods, kept out of the good schools, forced off the executive staff, forced out of the boardrooms, forced out of the top levels of government.

      The poor oppressed white people.

    9. Re:Haha..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah...that actually pretty accuratly describes the situation that a lot of poor white people are in.

    10. Re:Haha..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah yes, the poor oppressed black people, denied the good jobs, forced to drive the older cars, forced to live in the bad neighborhoods, kept out of the good schools, forced off the executive staff, forced out of the boardrooms, forced out from the top levels of government.

      The poor oppressed black people.

      Oh wait, this doesn't exist. We're out of the 60's.

    11. Re:Haha..... by mrseth · · Score: 1

      I remember somewhere around RedHat 6.1 (I think), one of the languages you could select during the install was Redneck. They've since rid their install of this option. I kind of liked it. Perhaps Lindows should "borrow" this feature given their current clientelle.

    12. Re:Haha..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're white. They wear A-shirts, drink beer, and kill animals for fun. They're part of the problem. Rednecks suck. Remember, only white people can be racists (ask any Harvard or Berkeley professor of political science).

    13. Re:Haha..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      white people suck. git whitey!

    14. Re:Haha..... by geekoid · · Score: 2

      I know many black and asian rednecks, so its not really race related. Granted it is a stereotype of wal-mart shoppers.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    15. Re:Haha..... by colmore · · Score: 4, Interesting

      thank you!

      "Redneck" is a race-blind slur.

      I went to middle school with white, black, and hispanic rednecks. and i'm glad i no longer have to deal with any of them.

      "Cracker" or "White Trash" is the slur you're looking for.

      however the difference between those and "nigger" is nigger implies nothing about culture or economic standing. it's purely racist. racists might call Colin Powell or Halle Berry niggers, but you wouldn't call a rich promonent white person White Trash or a Redneck.

      cultural slurs, while still offensive, bother me less than outright racial slurs.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    16. Re:Haha..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Point partially taken, but plenty of people called Clinton a redneck/cracker because of his genetic stock, and some call Bush the same, even though he was born with a platinum spoon in his mouth.

      Maybe it's just a pragmatic misuse of the epithet, as an obverse of "nigger" does not exist.

    17. Re:Haha..... by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      Back in the late 60's a book was published called 'The Student as Nigger.'

      It talked about people assuming the role.

      In a way, the title backfires on the New Left dude who wrote the book, if you think about it.

      Nobody is a Nigger who doesn't choose to be one. Just like nobody is a Red Neck who doesn't choose to be one.

      That's why I don't feel so bad when I notice stupid niggers out on the street doing the kind of things that will only keep themselves down. They're not niggers because of their race. They're niggers because they act like niggers. Lots of white people are niggers, too.

    18. Re:Haha..... by dadragon · · Score: 1

      That's why I don't feel so bad when I notice stupid niggers out on the street doing the kind of things that will only keep themselves down. They're not niggers because of their race. They're niggers because they act like niggers. Lots of white people are niggers, too.

      I agree, "nigger", and "redneck" are both mindsets. But some black people use the term nigger as a source of pride, while some white people use the term redneck as a source of pride.

      Sure there are people who will use it as a general discription of all people black, but they're stupid/ignorant/choose an adjective.

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
    19. Re:Haha..... by PCTrauma · · Score: 1

      Cracker is the white version of nigger.

      I can say cracker as much as I want, but not nigger? WTF?

      --
      PCTrauma LLC
    20. Re:Haha..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yep, you're absolutely correct... that's the price whitey pays in an affirmative action, quota based system.

    21. Re:Haha..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're white, yes. If you're not black or white, you shouldn't really use either. It's okay to make racist comments about your own race, but not other people's.

    22. Re:Haha..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last US President is a rich prominent white
      person, white trash!

    23. Re:Haha..... by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Actually, the black people (middle-class working folks) that I know use "nigger" to mean a person (usually black, but can be white or other) who remains *deliberately* ignorant or low-class despite having opportunity to better themselves. So in this common usage it DOES have a meaning relevant to class AND economic standing, very closely akin to "white trash", and has nothing at all to do with racism.

      And if you don't think rich/prominent whites sometimes get called White Trash or Rednecks, you must not have been around during the first Clinton presidential campaign.

      -1 Offtopic, -1, Flamebait, -1 Troll. Did I miss any of the mods from pissed-off idealists?? :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  5. Windows or Lindows by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why would people want to use a kludged together OS with loads of confusing legacy included for backwards compatibility and a cryptic API anyway?

    1. Re:Windows or Lindows by larry+bagina · · Score: 3, Funny

      Because the penguin is so cute?

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    2. Re:Windows or Lindows by Jippy_ · · Score: 1
      Why would people want to use a kludged together OS with loads of confusing legacy included for backwards compatibility and a cryptic API anyway?

      Wow, I didn't know Bill Gates even read Slashdot.

      =-Jippy

    3. Re:Windows or Lindows by slide-rule · · Score: 1
      Why would people want to use a kludged together OS with loads of confusing legacy included for backwards compatibility and a cryptic API anyway?
      Isn't that why I left Windows? ;-)
    4. Re:Windows or Lindows by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 2

      I pre-apologize for any stereotypical statements I make here.

      The typical 'Redneck' is assumed to not be able to afford a PC. I guess this puts it in their price range.
      In turn, the 'Redneck' enhances their intelligent thoughts by using these and starts using them PCs in their Roadkill Cafe' business ventures.
      MS and the BSA tries to come in and 'audit' their software......

      How fast do you think the shotguns would come out (owners AND patrons) telling MS/BSA to '...back off Billy!'

      The 'Rednecks' WILL stand up for themselves, guaranteed.

    5. Re:Windows or Lindows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take a look at the dictionary bitch, you'll find the word humor.

    6. Re:Windows or Lindows by Drachemorder · · Score: 0, Troll

      You're darn right about that. I'm a redneck and proud of it, and the BSA ain't gettin' anywhere NEAR my computer. My friends Mr. Smith and Mr. Wesson guarantee that.

    7. Re:Windows or Lindows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I swear. If I hear one more person say the word "kludgy" like my damn cubicle neighbor does all day long, I'm liable to keell ya!

    8. Re:Windows or Lindows by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      Actually, the most redneckian person I know was into building computers and stuff. I guess he thought it wasn't much different than working on cars. He even kept it on the front yard with the case open, sitting on a cinder block. Looked kinda artistic with the yellow grass neatly outlining it.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    9. Re:Windows or Lindows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm glad to hear someone finally caught on that it isn't that different from other stuff people tinker with at home. Aside from ESD precautions there's no reason the average person shouldn't be able to slap together a working system.

    10. Re:Windows or Lindows by jcast · · Score: 1

      Good point. Why do people use Windows, anyway? Too bad its too long for a sig...

      --
      There are reasons why democracy does not work nearly as well as capitalism.
      -- David D. Friedman
    11. Re:Windows or Lindows by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "Aside from ESD precautions there's no reason the average person shouldn't be able to slap together a working system. "

      Not sure what ESD is (jet lagged, brain no function) heh. My comment ended up being kinda sarcastic, but I am serious that a redneck friend of mine got into building computers. I think the only real requirement to building a machine is that you have to have an interest in doing so.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    12. Re:Windows or Lindows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait. Are you talking about Windows or UNIX?

    13. Re:Windows or Lindows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Electrostatic Discharge.

    14. Re:Windows or Lindows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kludgy.

    15. Re:Windows or Lindows by colmore · · Score: 2

      Perhaps the majority of slashdot has never encountered the Redneck computer culture.

      But riddle me this, Batman, who buys neon case mods? Why the very same people who buy neon pickup truck mods. There is an entire sub Mason-Dixon youth culture dedicated to building computers, and finding the most badass Winamp pluggins to watch while stoned on cheap weed.

      Evidence B: Deerhunter and it's ilk routinely sell in far greater volume than almost all "real" computer games. In fact, I think only the Sims sells better.

      So yes, people will buy these wallmart PCs, and install pirated copies of XP on them.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    16. Re:Windows or Lindows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Appreciated. :)

      NanoG

    17. Re:Windows or Lindows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jet lag?

      You've been riding too fast on your cousin Narville's jet-ski again?

      'fess up. Your neck is as red as they come.

    18. Re:Windows or Lindows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Especially when the only correct spelling is "klugey".

      It doesn't rhyme with "pudgy"!

    19. Re:Windows or Lindows by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      jet lag also jetlag (jtlg)

      n. A temporary disruption of bodily rhythms caused by high-speed travel across several time zones typically in a jet aircraft.jet-lagged adj.


      jet lag

      n : fatigue and sleep disturbance resulting from disruption of
      the body's normal circadian rhythm as a result of jet
      travel

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    20. Re:Windows or Lindows by unDees · · Score: 1
      Deerhunter and it's ilk

      Or should that be "Deerhunter and its elk?"

      *ducks to avoid water balloon*

      --
      "I call a baby goat a 'goatse.'" -- my non-Internet-savvy 6-year-old stepdaughter
    21. Re:Windows or Lindows by unitron · · Score: 2
      "Why would people want to use a kludged together OS with loads of confusing legacy included for backwards compatibility and a cryptic API anyway?"

      It's both amazing and frightening how many of those who replied don't realise that you were talking about MS Windows.

      Weren't you?

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  6. L/Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Damn, that's gonna cause confusion with tech support.

    "What OS are you using?"
    "Lindows"
    "Windows?"
    "Yeah, Lindows"

    1. Re:L/Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The engrish is even worse: "Rindows"

    2. Re:L/Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Redneck tech support horror stories:

      "What CD tray -- I thought that was the beer can holder!"

    3. Re:L/Windows by alkali · · Score: 1
      "What CD tray -- I thought that was the beer can holder!"

      Don't be ridiculous. A proper beer can holder would be big enough for the foam wraparound with NASCAR logos on it.

    4. Re:L/Windows by chris_mahan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Or, if your wife is Japanese like mine, Rindows.

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

  7. If there is hope, it lies in the proles by ematic · · Score: 5, Funny

    Seems like the wal-mart grade rednecks will be the frontrunners of the linux desktop revolution. Bet you didn't see that coming!

    --

    idm owns me
    1. Re:If there is hope, it lies in the proles by tid242 · · Score: 2, Funny
      To think of the legions of rednecks who could now possibly be running Lindows instead of Windows...

      they'd better put the 'Redneck' language option back into their distro's, ever since RH rm'd it things just haven't been the same around here *sigh*..

      -tid242

      damn i need a better sig :(

      --

      With a few exceptions, secrecy is deeply incompatible with democracy and with science. --Carl Sagan

    2. Re:If there is hope, it lies in the proles by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 1

      This implies that rednecks shop at Wal-mart. WTF?!

    3. Re:If there is hope, it lies in the proles by slam+smith · · Score: 1, Funny

      This implies that rednecks shop at Wal-mart.

      TRUE rednecks wouldn't be caught dead shopping in walmart, they dig through the dumpster behind the wal-mart.

    4. Re:If there is hope, it lies in the proles by wils0n · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, most rednecks don't have an IT dept. to convince..

    5. Re:If there is hope, it lies in the proles by itsjpr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, this is not a surprise. Think of stock car racing. It grew out of average folks with limited budgets buying commodity hardware and making it scream with a little tinkering. Today, NASCAR racing is big buisness and very popular with the Wal-Mart crowd. They are gifted with the hacker mentality.

      Wal-Mart is just making it possible for the next generation of gear heads to soup up the next generation of hardware.

      Think of this. So what if the hardware isn't on the high end. So what if all their Windows games aren't supported. I'd like to see people out there (eg. high school/trade school shop teachers/LUGs) showing people how to combine the power of their systems or tweak the shit out of them. Heck at $300 some folks would be willing risk gluing a refrigerator to their CPU!

      The fun will come from racing the tweaked-out systems, bringing them together to render awesome graphics, or participating in multi-player games.

      This is a HUGE opportunity to foster LUGs in places other than the "big city".

      Good Luck.

    6. Re:If there is hope, it lies in the proles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently you've never seen Eric S. Raymond.

    7. Re:If there is hope, it lies in the proles by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      The problem is, the NASCAR scene comes out of the fact that people can weld steel, they all know somebody who can do some machining. It's your basic metalwork, etc.

      When a grassroots movement of actual software developers takes root, and kids are actually looked up at by their peers because they wrote the driver for the new sound card, what you propose might start to make sense.

      As it is, the rednecks in the screwdriver shops are just plugging parts together. There are auto enthusiasts who do the same thing, but the NASCAR set knows more than how to handle a crescent wrench.

    8. Re:If there is hope, it lies in the proles by ozric2k1 · · Score: 1

      NASCAR grew out of the moonshine industry and the need to deliver a product without getting nicked.

    9. Re:If there is hope, it lies in the proles by foniksonik · · Score: 2

      I'm thinking you should start a branch of Lindows and title it 'RedNeck' just to piss off RedHat while simultaneously pissing of Microsoft.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    10. Re:If there is hope, it lies in the proles by itsjpr · · Score: 1

      There's still plenty of illegal activity out there. It's just that now you need to have secure systems to stay ahead of the traffic cops on the net. ;)

  8. the "wal-mart crowd" by T.Monk · · Score: 1

    Are we sure this is a good thing? Now every billy joe bob in the territory is going to be calling me up wanting me to come fix his computer... at least with windows there were Microsoft tech support lines and stuff that i could pawn them off on.. "Sorry bud, I don't do Windows." They know i'm a *nix freak, so my number is going to be on the top of their list.. sheesh...

    1. Re:the "wal-mart crowd" by slam+smith · · Score: 1

      Just change the root password on them. Then they won't be able to screw anything up. :-)

    2. Re:the "wal-mart crowd" by bangpath · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You know, I've a couple of posts around /. lately talking about how great the /. community is..caring and helpful, but in the few posts I see here so far, all I see it snobbery. Just because someone lives near a Wal-Mart or goes to a Wal-Mart to buy stuff (even if it's a computer), doesn't make that person a hick or a red-neck.

      Maybe you people should be glad that Wal-Mart is embracing something other than Windows, instead of being so damn smug. Get off your high horse and join the movement, or shut the f*** up.

      That's all I have to say about that.

      --
      *** Stop trying to be cool. ***
    3. Re:the "wal-mart crowd" by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Don't you get paid for helping people out? If so then this would be a good thing.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    4. Re:the "wal-mart crowd" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's probably because the *nix geeks around here want everyone to use their particular flavor of the week. Except that's impossible.

      So what they really want is for computers to be limited to a technically perceptive few.

      Ie., them. It's a superiority complex.

      The only other thing I can think of is: you made your bed. Now burn in it. Every damn trailer trash Billy Bob in the world is gonna come looking for those Linux fellers and can they come fix mah' computer, yee-haw.

      Well, haw haw haw.

      Yeah. It's a troll. Now fsck off.

    5. Re:the "wal-mart crowd" by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      Have you ever been to Wal-Mart? Look around. :)

      I shop at Wal-Mart all the time, so I'm not sure if I'm "better than" the average clientel or not. I'm pretty sure that being a hick or redneck doesn't make someone bad either, even though bangpath makes it sound that way (in a post about getitng off a high horse)...

    6. Re:the "wal-mart crowd" by Bilbo · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Are we sure this is a good thing? Now every billy joe bob in the territory is going to be calling me up wanting me to come fix his computer..
      And, the problem with this is....?

      Aren't we always saying that it's the non-technical users who make up the bulk of the market, and who, in the end, will finally break the back of the MS monopoly on the desktop market?

      Besides, I really doubt that the "Billy Bob" type users will be buying this. They are going to stick with the brand name they know -- Microsoft. It's the somewhat adventurous types who will buy into this, just because it's different, or cutting edge, or "revolutionary". Those are the people who may not have enough money to go out and plunk down $1500 for a new Dell and set out on their own, but lower the entrance barriers just a little bit, and they'll jump for it.

      --
      Your Servant, B. Baggins
    7. Re:the "wal-mart crowd" by gTsiros · · Score: 1

      By what you say, you imply that a "hick" or a "redneck" is something "bad".

      That's idiotic.

      --
      Looking for people to chat about multicopters, coding, music. skype: gtsiros
    8. Re:the "wal-mart crowd" by maniac11 · · Score: 2

      WalMart is destroying America. As a member of this society, the most important thing you can do is vote with your dollars. Buy locally. You'll almost assuredly have a better experience and you won't be sending your dollars to Arkansas.

      --
      Guvegrra?
    9. Re:the "wal-mart crowd" by meisenst · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I live near a Wal-Mart... and I'm a Lindows Insider. I guess all Lindows Insiders are rednecks too?

      Hey, wait, does that mean that since the Lindows staff are all inherently Insiders, that they are all rednecks as well?

      Whoa, hold on! They are contributing to the general software cause that we all love to talk about here on Slashdot. Does that mean all contributors to the well-being of Linux and alternative OSes, Slashdot readers, and everyone else that uses a computer is a redneck?

      I think I've made my point somewhere herein.

      me

      --
      Green's Law of Debate: Anything is possible if you don't know what you're talking about.
    10. Re:the "wal-mart crowd" by Mupp252 · · Score: 1

      So your philosphy is use an OS no one else knows so no one will interact with you or ask you questions on familiar ones?

      And you wonder why you've never been with a woman without giving her your credit card info first!

    11. Re:the "wal-mart crowd" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's why it's "destroying america":
      1. It is less expensive than local shops.
      2. It offers better products than local shops.
      3. It offers better service than local shops.
      So why the fuck would I shop at a local shop?

    12. Re:the "wal-mart crowd" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > WalMart is destroying America [davelippman.com].

      Yeah, all us poor Americans are forced into the stores where we can find most things we want in one trip at low prices. What is the world coming to.

      > thing you can do is vote with your dollars.

      I believe that's already been done. Wal-Mart won the election.

      > experience and you won't be sending your dollars
      > to Arkansas [google.com].

      *gasp*. To ARKANSAS! I'll stop shopping there immediately, don't those Arkansans know they're not supposed to be successful?!

    13. Re:the "wal-mart crowd" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Destroying America? How? By not kowtowing to this guy's liberal agenda? Too fscking bad.

    14. Re:the "wal-mart crowd" by Bill+Currie · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      would your point be something to do with pots, kettles and soot? :)

      --

      Bill - aka taniwha
      --
      Leave others their otherness. -- Aratak

    15. Re:the "wal-mart crowd" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That's all? What so rednecks can't laugh at themselves? rednecks are above the fine and long American tradition of giving others a hard time for amusment? I don't think so.

      Last I saw rednecks were just as willing to spread the wealth and make fun of just about anyone else you can think of so that makes them fair game too.

      Just to put a nice closing spin on things I'm liable to come to your desk to provide your tech support with a pinch of Copenhagen under my lip.

      I work in Houston Texas. We could very easily have the highest percentage of rednecks in the entire United States. We drive trucks, we wear cowboy boots, and a large number of us like at least a few songs by David Allen Coe. A lot of those same people also know their way around distro or two so all is not always as it seems.

      I don't take the jokes too seriously and niether should anyone else.

    16. Re:the "wal-mart crowd" by lrichardson · · Score: 2
      "Besides, I really doubt that the "Billy Bob" type users will be buying this. They are going to stick with the brand name they know -- Microsoft. It's the somewhat adventurous types who will buy into this, just because it's different, or cutting edge, or "revolutionary". Those are the people who may not have enough money to go out and plunk down $1500 for a new Dell and set out on their own, but lower the entrance barriers just a little bit, and they'll jump for it."

      I think you're seriously overestimating the the public's decision making ability. They want cheap. And easy. M$ has made a fortune on selling 'ease of use' ... which, to a certain extent, is true: Windows is generally easier to set up for the average user. Crashes and the BSOD? Standard marketing line ... lure them in with the lowest price, and promise them the sun and the moon, then, when they're hooked, they have to keep buying 'upgrades' and 'compatible software'.

      The other bit of info I think is relevent is just what the average user does ... which is, according to numerous studies, the internet (surfing, mail, and IM), and games. Lindows has proved that it handles the first group (i.e., running IE, Outlook/Express, and IM, as well as built in versions) perfectly well. Games? Well, I cried over the death of Loki, but as a programmer, it's generally far easier to write (games) for *nix based systems than trying for compatibility with every damn Windows version. (Anyone still fighting the Netrek addiction?)

      I believe *nix was already starting to erode the monopoly the M$ had ... this is just another step (although a large one) along that road.

    17. Re:the "wal-mart crowd" by bangpath · · Score: 1

      In that particular context, I was indeed thinking of a "hick" or "redneck" as something bad (uneducated, perhaps some other criteria). If you consider being a hick or redneck necessarily a good thing, then perhaps the point is moot. Essentially, the few comments I read when this story was first posted use the word "redneck" in a negative connotation, thus my post.

      In any case, the REAL point is that linux is for everyone, not just smug uber-nerds*, and that linux nerds should promote this Wal-Mart thing as progress in the right direction.

      * I don't care for the use of the word geek, so I use nerd. Compare the dictionary.com versions of the definitions of each, and see which one is lacking a particular sense.

      --
      *** Stop trying to be cool. ***
    18. Re:the "wal-mart crowd" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well they lied. Slashdot is a community of all kinds of people and I never have seen then to be particularly nice. Some are nice while others are not.

    19. Re:the "wal-mart crowd" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, when I have a million bucks in the bank and can afford NOT to go for the cheapest prices around, then I will. Unfortunately, I've gotta shop around and Walmart offers the lowest prices for most things.

      I'd rather support a local company, but I'm not in that position right now.

    20. Re:the "wal-mart crowd" by daddymac · · Score: 1
      Just change the root password on them. Then they won't be able to screw anything up. :-)

      According to this review of Lindows on NewsForge makes it seem like you have to run your Windows software as root for it to work properly.

      --
      If something I said can be interpreted two ways, and one of the ways makes you sad or angry, I meant the other one.
    21. Re:the "wal-mart crowd" by mikeee · · Score: 4, Funny

      so, remember folks:

      Buying from local merchant: Good.
      Buying from non-local stone-age tribesmen: Good. No, wait, bad! No, wait, good!
      Buying at Giant Swedish Superstore: Good.
      Buying from Large Arkansas Superstore: Bad.

      Hey, if I move to Bentonville, can I still shop at Wal-mart?

    22. Re:the "wal-mart crowd" by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Did it occur to you that the reason people go to Walmart is because it's cheap and convenient? They didn't put a musket to anybody's head.

      When I was a teenager, I had a friend that had 3 bros and 3 sis's. They *needed* WalMart to survive. If they had cheap computers running Lindows for cheap, then they'd have been able to get on the net.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    23. Re:the "wal-mart crowd" by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      Oh, I certainly wasn't saying that you were wrong. I just wanted to illustrate the irony of the way it was expressed. :) I'm all for Wal-Mart selling linux-ish computers.

      I'll disagree with the nerd v/s geek thing, though. I'm partial to "geek" because of the general connotation among my peer group is more significant to me than the absolute definition in a dictionary. To each his own, though. ;)

    24. Re:the "wal-mart crowd" by quantaman · · Score: 2

      The problem is that from what most of us have heard Lindows isn't exactly ready to be the champion that takes on windows with the masses. If Lindows is still as raw as we've all heard, the non-geeks who buy these machines will expect to essentially get a cheap Windows machine, when it doesn't work as advertised they are going to brand all Linux distros as cheap Windows knock-offs that don't work. This is exactly the image that many /.ers hate the most. This isn't just snobbery, we're essentially trying to marginalize a group because we suspect they may soon misrepresent us in ways we don't want to be represented. It isn't the Wal-Mart shoppers fault, many of them might catch on and have fall in love with linux. However unfortunatly but due to their ignorance about computers will probably end up just as unwilling particapents in a beta test for an OS that doesn't sell itself exactly as it is.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    25. Re:the "wal-mart crowd" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i know your fear! someone, out there, is going to call me, and say something like "i'm a customer of yours and i can't get the innernet to work." and they won't know they aren't using Windows, and we'll move along like it is Windows, and then what we're looking at won't match, and i'll ask if this is an iMac, and they'll say no, it's Windows. and i'll say are you sure? and they'll say yes, and i'll say okay, then you should see this, and they'll say no, i see that. and i'll say you're making this up. and they'll say no, that is what they see. and i'll say....

    26. Re:the "wal-mart crowd" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like a list of all the idiots who said the Slashdot community is "great".

    27. Re:the "wal-mart crowd" by 13Echo · · Score: 2

      Actually, I am proud that the company is the first large retail chain to have the balls to sell such a product. Nobody else would stand in MS's way in such a situation. Who knows how successful these things will be, but at least they are taking a chance.

      And regardless of weather or not Wal-Mart caters primarily to the Apalachian crowd, Linux can be a good alternative for everybody in the right situation. That is how it was intended to be... Free, and available to everyone. As a matter of fact, it looks like Lindows is shipping on these PCs at no extra cost. Last time I checked, the minimum was still at the $400 price tag.

    28. Re:the "wal-mart crowd" by 13Echo · · Score: 2

      Oh wait. Looks like they now have a nice little Duron 800 for $299. How can you beat that, with or without an OS?

    29. Re:the "wal-mart crowd" by wils0n · · Score: 1

      WTF? So now the masses are going to not only have clueless tech support, but also the option of asshole tech support. That's wonderful!
      Is it just me, or is the BOFH syndrome local to *nix ops?

    30. Re:the "wal-mart crowd" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "When I was a teenager, I had a friend that had 3 bros and 3 sis's. They *needed* WalMart to survive."

      Wal-Mart must not sell condoms. Bummer for your friend's family.

    31. Re:the "wal-mart crowd" by LinuxHam · · Score: 2

      I don't care for the use of the word geek, so I use nerd. Compare the dictionary.com versions of the definitions of each, and see which one is lacking a particular sense.

      From dictionary.com

      nerd:
      A foolish, inept, or unattractive person.
      A person who is single-minded or accomplished in scientific or technical pursuits but is felt to be socially inept.

      geek:
      A person regarded as foolish, inept, or clumsy.
      A person who is single-minded or accomplished in scientific or technical pursuits but is felt to be socially inept.
      A carnival performer whose show consists of bizarre acts, such as biting the head off a live chicken.

      So nerds are ugly and geeks are clumsy and do weird things. Otherwise they're exactly identical. Sorry bud, I'm not throwing out my "geek" shirt from ThinkGeek because you would prefer that I consider myself ugly instead of eccentric.

      Blessed are the geeks for they shall inherit the Earth. And no, I didn't customize my sig just for you.

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
    32. Re:the "wal-mart crowd" by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Wal-Mart must not sell condoms."

      You don't have to live in a family of 9 (2 parents + 7 kids) to have little money to survive on.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    33. Re:the "wal-mart crowd" by ocbwilg · · Score: 2

      The Wal-Mart crowd? I shop at Wal-Mart regularly and there is one in the suburb that I live in. I'd hardly consider myself or any of my neighbors to be rednecks, hillbillies, or "billy joe bobs". Sure, Wal-Mart had it's roots in rural communities in Arkansas, but they've gotten as big as they are by offering brand-name products at reasonable prices. They still sell Gamecubes and PS2s and Xboxes just like Best Buy. They've increased their marketshare and presence in urban areas and more upscale suburbs because they offer a good value proposition, just like any other store would. They are no longer the niche player that is only present in small town USA.

    34. Re:the "wal-mart crowd" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      chmod +s

    35. Re:the "wal-mart crowd" by King_TJ · · Score: 2

      Yeah, personally - I'd rather see a popular/common standard Linux distro like Mandrake or RedHat pre-loaded on these type of inexpensive PCs and sold as what it is, Linux.

      I can already see the whole "Lindows" product name confusing people. "Umm, excuse me sir? Can you tell me what this Lindows machine is all about? I guess this is a clone of Windows. Does it run everything 100% compatible?" (To which the average Wal-Mart clerk will either respond "I don't know. I think it's supposed to." or "No, it's like the old days of computers - when stores like Radio Shack sold "PC compatibles" that were a lot cheaper than IBM but only ran about half of the programs properly."

      In the end, these things probably won't sell very well to their target market. Instead, college students on a tight budget who already are Linux-savvy will grab them on clearance sales.

    36. Re:the "wal-mart crowd" by reallocate · · Score: 1

      You're right to lament the immature and sophomoric bias that seems to lurk behind this, and many other, posts. Too many people self-identify with something they call the "open source movement" simply because it provides cover for their ill-placed elitism and snobbery. For anyone who genuinely wants to see competition for Microsoft, the availability of another OS -- any other OS -- in the largest retailer on the planet ought to be brilliant news. It's only bad news if you own sense of self-worth has some dependency on maintaining Linux and open source as a cult.

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    37. Re:the "wal-mart crowd" by surfcow · · Score: 2
      ... instead of being so damn smug. Get off your high horse and join the movement, or shut the f*** up.

      Um, your equine mount seems a touch elivated too, bucko. So people found a little humor in the idea. Big deal. We find humor in lots of ideas. Everyone seems to welcome it. No one is calling for eugenics or ethnic cleansing here, just having a chuckle, like they do with every other article on /. Lighten up and consider decaf, kay?

      =brian

    38. Re:the "wal-mart crowd" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn straight! Come on by later with your white hood and some gasoline for the cross for more family fun.

    39. Re:the "wal-mart crowd" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For all the hype about the Linux community being helpful and supportive, I have found that this does not apply to newbies. Yes, many Linux geeks ARE snobs. I have seen newbies flamed in message boards and in Linux chat rooms for nothing more than being a newbie and asking a simple question. Most of the answers (when they get one) consist of 'go to www.linuxnewbie.org' or 'Read the Man pages'. This attitude is turning off a lot of people who are interested in Linux. Please, remember when you were a beginner and have patience with us newbies. And geeze, answer a simple question with at straight forward answer, will ya?

    40. Re:the "wal-mart crowd" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm suprised at all the negativity surrounding this issue. I represent Walmart's target audience- a customer that has an older computer and would like to upgrade for cheap. If the parts aren't half-bad, I would consider one of these systems.

      Isn't this what we all want- to have a *nix version available to the masses? Sure, it's not the distro I would choose either, but instead of ballyhooing about how all these customers are going to return these machines because they're too stupid to figure it out, why can't the local LUGs get in touch with the Walmarts and offer their services. Walmarts usually have small classroom spaces set up for employee training- use that space to run "Learn How to Use Your Computer" classes. Let's show the newbies what we can do, and what we've known all along...it doesn't take big bucks and a huge M$ license to be a savvy computer user.

    41. Re:the "wal-mart crowd" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are entirely right about the customers at some Walmarts not being rednecks, hillbillies or "billy joe bobs" - those folks shop at the Walmarts in more rural locations. The folks who shop at urban Walmarts (like in the suburb that you live in) are known as "White Trash". See the difference?

    42. Re:the "wal-mart crowd" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually when you have a million dollars you will still shop at Wal-Mart.

      You will probably go to the Salvation Army for your clothes.

      People who earn their million through their hard work (rather than inheriting Mommy-and-Daddy's or Grandpa's money or through a dot-com windfall fluke) tend to be penny pinchers and don't pay top dollar for everything they buy. If they had that habit chances are they'd have never gotten their million.

    43. Re:the "wal-mart crowd" by black88 · · Score: 1

      David Alan Coe is my GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  9. So? by l33t+j03 · · Score: 1
    No one will buy them. Just like VA servers. Dell learned. So will Wal-Mart.

    Linux, the Wal-Mart Operating System.

  10. Fuck you bitch! by destiney · · Score: 0, Troll


    To think of the legions of rednecks...

    Fuck you bitch! I shop at Wal-Mart and I'm no redneck!

    1. Re:Fuck you bitch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you bitch! I shop at Wal-Mart and I'm no redneck!

      As evidenced by the eloquent literary expression.

    2. Re:Fuck you bitch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YhbT YhL hand.

      Really, people, it's called sarcasm.

  11. new software suggestion for lindows... by sporkee · · Score: 1, Funny
    To think of the legions of rednecks who could now possibly be running Lindows instead of Windows..."

    in light of this, someone's gonna have to write some family tree software for lindows that lets your mother and sister to be one and the same...

    --

    ----------
    "Yes, I have breasts. Now quit looking at them"
    http://www.geek-ware.co.uk

    1. Re:new software suggestion for lindows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's like the CS student from West Virginia, his homework in complex graph theory was to draw his family tree!

    2. Re:new software suggestion for lindows... by mikeee · · Score: 2

      Mother and sister are one and the same?

      Apparently these rednecks have Linux and time travel, because they're their own fathers! Who knew...

    3. Re:new software suggestion for lindows... by ahaning · · Score: 1

      Brings to mind the Tom Lehrer song "Oedipus Rex" ...

      From the Bible to the popular song,
      There's one theme that we find right along,
      Of all ideals they hold as good,
      The most sublime is motherhood.
      There was a man, though, who it seems,
      Once carried this ideal to extremes,
      He loved his mother and she loved him,
      And yet his story is rather grim.

      There once lived a man named Oedipus Rex,
      You may have heard about his odd complex,
      His name appears in Freud's index,
      'Cos he loved his mother!

      His rivals used to say quite a bit,
      That as a monarch he was most unfit,
      But still in all, they had to admit
      That he loved his mother!

      Yes he loved his mother like no other,
      His daughter was his sister
      And his son was his brother,
      One thing on which you can depend is,
      He sure knew who a boy's best friend is!

      When he found what he had done,
      He tore his eyes out one by one,
      A tragic end to a loyal son,
      Who loved his mother!

      So be sweet and kind to mother,
      Now and then have a chat,
      Buy her candy or some flowers,
      Or a brand-new hat -
      But maybe you'd better let it go that...
      Or you might find yourself with a quite complex complex,
      And you may end up like Oedipus,
      I'd rather marry a duck-billed platypus,
      Then end up like old Oedipus Rex!

      --
      Withdrawal before climax is very ineffective and those who try this are usually called "parents."
    4. Re:new software suggestion for lindows... by whiteranger99x · · Score: 1
      Apparently these rednecks have Linux and time travel, because they're their own fathers! Who knew...

      It happened to Fry in Futurama when he turned out to be his own grandfather during the Roswell situation ;)

      --
      Join the TWIT army now!
  12. computurds by geekfiend · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'd like one of those computurds with the megaram and the gigahurts. Does it come with the www.pr0n.com installed?

    -Joe
    Not Funny, but I try

    1. Re:computurds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol.. its funny.. what would be funnier is if you picture the redneck in The Simpsons saying this.

    2. Re:computurds by Schnapple · · Score: 1

      For the sake of refrerence his name is Cletus the Slack-Jawed Yokel

  13. hm.... by daf00masta · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now I wonder how long it'll take for M$ to launch OE for Lindows, and carry all the virii along...FUN FUN FUN Or better yet, they try to sue Walmart for trying to bully out Microsoft products off the shelves by using anti-competitive tactics....

  14. Screenshots Link by simetra · · Score: 3, Informative
    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    1. Re:Screenshots Link by reschly · · Score: 1

      If you know enough to run this, don't you also know enough not to use AOL (icon at top of screen)

      --


      I believe that the existence of women is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy
    2. Re:Screenshots Link by Hegemony+Cricket · · Score: 1

      I love the AOL icon on the Desktop...Sweet Jeebus are some folks gonna be annoyed...

      --
      "I ain't got no flyin' shoes."
    3. Re:Screenshots Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      doesn't change the fact that unlike linux you still have to pay 99 bucks to download it. I will stick with my linx distros.

  15. Call me crazy, but... by Elledan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm of the opinion that people (this includes everyone) should be made aware of the fact that there are different OSs, of which only a few can run the software written for another OS. With this rudimentary knowledge, the world would become a much more pleasant place to live in if you happen to work at a helldesk. Note: the typo was intentional.

    --
    Site & blog: http://www.mayaposch.com
    1. Re:Call me crazy, but... by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 2
      Here's one way to explain this to a stereotypical (!!!!) redneck:

      Customer: $299? That's pretty cheap. It come with Windows?
      Salesman: No sir, it comes with Linux. It's a different operating system.
      Customer: Huh?
      Salesman: Think of Windows like a thirty-eight and Linux like a nine millimeter. Same size bullet, they both do the job, but you wouldn't put thirty-eight rounds in a nine millimeter or vice versa. But there's plenty of ammo for both.
      Customer: Oh, so it can do all the same stuff?
      Salesman: Yep, lemme show you...

      (It may actually be more of a disservice to use Lindows than to use another Linux distribution, such as Mandrake or Red Hat, for the purposes of this explanation.)

  16. Walmart is big enough to make this fly by dlur · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A company as large as Walmart might be just big enough and have enough bargain-basement customers to make this fly. And at $299 for the Duron 850mhz model, who can't afford one of these.

    One problem I can see is that the hardware in these systems might(and probably is) of sub-par level. Instability issues caused by poor hardware quality may undermine the "frugal" consumer's viewpoint of the *nix OS enviroment. Not to mention that they'll have a hard time finding tech support locally considering that most tech shops are generally geared towards MS products and not Linux.

    --
    Duris MUD - The best pkill MUD. Ever.
    1. Re:Walmart is big enough to make this fly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, Linux tends to run really well on cheap shitty hardware. Hell, I've had a motherboard which would not run windows setup no matter what (no kidding - kept crashing with a random error, problem went away with mobo replaced). Linux ran rock-solid on the thing. If it's supported, it will be way more solid than any windows version (including win2k, nt, xp, whatever - those crash only a little less often than 9x).

    2. Re:Walmart is big enough to make this fly by lynx_user_abroad · · Score: 5, Interesting
      This is a major step up from the "os-less" PC they were selling before, but still a step in the right direction.

      The hardware may be crud, but if it is, drag it down the block to WalMart and get a replacement box. And now that it has an OS included, you can prove that the hardware is broke.

      This is not to say "Behold WalMart, our savior", but rather to say "Now that Microsoft has some serious threat to worry about, we may be able to catch our breath before heading back into the arena..."

      And at $300 bucks, assembled, with warranty, it practically meets my definition for "buy it for the parts".

      --

      The thing about things we don't know is we often don't know we don't know them.

    3. Re:Walmart is big enough to make this fly by MrResistor · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In every comparison I've seen Linux has proven to be more tollerant of hardware faults that Windows. My personal experience is that I can take a stick of RAM with a bad address that crashes Win2k about every hour, and use it without issue under Linux thanks to memtest86 and badram. Granted, that's fairly annecdotal, but certainly something to think about.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    4. Re:Walmart is big enough to make this fly by psycht · · Score: 2, Insightful

      $299 is very nice.. but really they should add in a monitor and make it a whole package deal.

    5. Re:Walmart is big enough to make this fly by spotter · · Score: 2

      there are 2 things to note about this.

      1) you are using a patch that is not in the mainline kernel (and I'm not sure if its in any vendor kernel, as I roll my own I can't say)

      2) you also know how to use memtest86 to set up the badram options correctly. Most people dont.

      So yes, while linux can be more tolerant of hardware faults than windows, in general its harder on the harder than win9x. WinNT based OS's from my experience are at least just as hard on the hardware so will expose the same faults that Linux will, and sometimes more, see AGP, AMD's MP chipset on the original MP motherboards using nvidia cards or Radeons, very susceptible to crashes on 2K/XP till they worked around it, didn't have this problem in linux with my Radeon as the XFree driver wasn't as "advanced" so didn't stress the system much.

    6. Re:Walmart is big enough to make this fly by Buck2 · · Score: 1

      I have 30 sticks of 512 MB RAM that has tested bad with memtest86. We don't want to use them even with the badram patch.

      Want to buy them?

      --

      As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
    7. Re:Walmart is big enough to make this fly by doorbot.com · · Score: 3, Interesting

      One problem I can see is that the hardware in these systems might(and probably is) of sub-par level. Instability issues caused by poor hardware quality may undermine the "frugal" consumer's viewpoint of the *nix OS enviroment.

      You may be right. However, I would argue that people buying this PC are either first timers (and thus don't know the difference) or they're ex-Windows users who want to replace their aging PC. In either case, a Linux-based solution will knock the socks off of em.

      If they're new to computers, someone they know probably has one and that's why they bought one for themselves. But their pals probably don't have the latest MS OS, and even if they did, it's probably running on the same hardware as these Walmart PCs. I have to give the advantage to the Lindows-based PC (with regards to dealing with cheapo hardware).

      If they're replacing an old computer, they probably have a very old PC, perhaps early Pentium, and thus they probably run Windows 95 and crash 3 times an hour. Again, I have to give the advantage to the Lindows-based PC.

      What no one's seemed to mention yet is that AMD has gotten a good deal out of this too, especially if this takes off. I also wonder who makes the various chipsets on the board (if it was SIS that'd be great).

    8. Re:Walmart is big enough to make this fly by hawk · · Score: 2
      >One problem I can see is that the hardware in
      >these systems might(and probably is) of sub-par
      >level.


      oh, come on. THis is *walmart* we're talking about. They'd *never* sell anything of other than the finest quality . . .


      :(


      hawk

    9. Re:Walmart is big enough to make this fly by DoctorFrog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I disagree. What if you want to relace a broken PC, or replace a non-broken but outdated one? Why force the customer to buy a new monitor when they already have one? If it's a first-time purchase, you can buy a cheapo ($100-odd) monitor in Wal-Mart at the same time, or shell out a bit more to buy yourself a nicer one.

    10. Re:Walmart is big enough to make this fly by nehril · · Score: 5, Interesting

      there are potentially bad consequences to this. consider:

      - lUser buys a Lindows PC from walmart

      - lUser cannot figure out how to cut and paste from the Mozilla web browser to Abiword (a harsh welcome to Xwindows indeed). Worse, he never did figure out that to print he had to type "ghostview - | lpr -Pepson277 /dev/usb0" into every single app's preferences.

      - lUser realizes that the "screen is ugly" (i.e. fonts suck)

      - lUser cannot get onto The AOL.

      - of 100,000 units sold, 70,000 get returned.

      - walmart takes a bath. "Linux Sucks" is now "proven" to all the business execs with buying power. Nothing scares the CFO like "losing money."

      - Linux returns to it's ashes, the supergeek community.

      linux may not be ready for this, folks.

    11. Re:Walmart is big enough to make this fly by MrResistor · · Score: 2

      As I said, the comparisons I've seen tell a different story; that Linux is better able to keep running in the face of hardware failure than WinNT. I'm one of those lucky few who never seem to have hardware fail, though, so I don't have any personal experience in that regard. All the bad hardware I've had was bad when I got it, and that one stick of RAM is the only one I haven't sent back (because it was sitting on my shelf for to long before I tested it. D'oh!)

      I agree with your points about my badram example, but the only reason I included it was to illustrate the fact that with Linux it is sometimes possible to add kernel patches, etc, in order to work around hardware faults, while that option isn't available in Win2k (or any other Windows, to my knowledge). I see your AGP issue as being different, since that was a hardware conflict inherent to that particular combination of hardware, not a piece of hardware that failed.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    12. Re:Walmart is big enough to make this fly by MrResistor · · Score: 2

      I can't imagine what I would do with that much RAM, but I might be interested if the price is right. What type of RAM is it?

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    13. Re:Walmart is big enough to make this fly by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      1) User does not even know he can cut and paste. Or if he does, Lindows will come set up to make the standard keys work with the apps included.

      2) Does not realize screen is ugly - I'll bet most people have no idea when they are looking at good fonts.

      3) AOL - how do you know that wont work? I thought the whole point of Lindows is that it would run some Windows apps. Does anyone know if the AOL client will run in Lindows? Besides, perhaps WalMart will start up something like BlueLight.com (KMart's service) if they don't have it already, and include connectivity solutions.

      4) I think your return rate predicitons are too harsh. But both are opinions are just that... it will be interesting to see if this succeeds.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    14. Re:Walmart is big enough to make this fly by Eimi+Metamorphoumai · · Score: 1
      lUser cannot figure out how to cut and paste from the Mozilla web browser to Abiword (a harsh welcome to Xwindows indeed).

      Um. lUser selects text and either hits control-c to copy, or right clicks and chooses copy. Then goes to AbiWord and either hits control-v to paste, or right clicks and choses paste. That's EXACTLY like Windows. Have you even used the software you're dissing? (Of course, there's also the X Window stuff with PRIMARY instead of CLIPBOARD, but that doesn't stop the other way from working.)
      --

      Visit me on #weirdness on the Galaxynet.

    15. Re:Walmart is big enough to make this fly by nehril · · Score: 1

      cut and paste keybinds might be fixed, but in my experience you can run into a world of hurt trying to cut and paste between gnome, kde, and "other" apps for many reasons. the keybinds are sometimes an issue, sometimes the clipboards simply do not see each other. Trying to cut and paste anything more complicated than text can get ugly fast.

      it's true that many users will simply not have anything to compare fonts to, but many others will notice that their work pc "looks nicer," or friends will say something when they come over to gawk at the new pc. It's subtle but noticeable, my non-technical friends immediately notice how nice the display on my new Tibook is vs. my pc, and that perception has alot to do with anti-aliasing, etc. (and my pc is running a geforce3 on a LaCie 19" monitor).

      aol may indeed work on lindows, but I would be surprised. aol installs funky "aol adapters" that do all sorts of damage to the windows network stack.

      I'll admit my return rate predictions are a bit on the high side, but when you factor in the cost of processing each return, even a 10-20% return rate could wreck the margins on the rest.

    16. Re:Walmart is big enough to make this fly by pyite69 · · Score: 1


      The difference is that previously, the Wal-Mart
      computers didn't have an operating system at
      all, from what I understand. This is the perfect
      use for Linux - it can be loaded by default, and
      if the customer wants Windows they cough up an
      extra hundred bucks.

    17. Re:Walmart is big enough to make this fly by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      When WalMart starts selling volumes 3 and 8 of the O'Reilly X Window Systems Guide, I'll start hoping there's an inkling of a chance you're right.

      Hell, barely anybody at all anywhere has those essential references.

    18. Re:Walmart is big enough to make this fly by FeeDBaCK · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually... Lindows has some proprietary components that take care of all of your listed "problems". It only uses KDE, so there is no worry about KDE/Gnome compatability problems. Printing is done via CUPS and a proprietary printer setup to make it more like Windows. Fonts are TrueType (same as Windows). AOL is a supported application. MS Office works.

      So what was your arguement? Maybe you should *try* Lindows before bashing it.

      --
      wolf31o2 Developer, Gentoo Linux Games Team
    19. Re:Walmart is big enough to make this fly by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 2
      - lUser cannot figure out how to cut and paste from the Mozilla web browser to Abiword (a harsh welcome to Xwindows indeed).

      The clipboard issues have been fully resolved with KDE3, and that was the only thing that caused problems in the first place. All the major apps are now compliant with the standards, the only clipboard problems are with old installations. Linux is developing fast, can we please drop the now-dead clipboard thing?

    20. Re:Walmart is big enough to make this fly by Eimi+Metamorphoumai · · Score: 2

      My point, which you seem to be ignoring, is that Walmart users don't care about what happens under the hood, they just care that it works the way they expect it to. And my real point is IT DOES WORK THE WAY THEY EXPECT IT TO. Really. Try it yourself. Select, control-c, switch apps, control-v. There are usability things to complain about in Linux, but that isn't one of them.

      --

      Visit me on #weirdness on the Galaxynet.

    21. Re:Walmart is big enough to make this fly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know what distro you use (Slackware? Debian?), but the ones I tried (Mandrake, Suse) all seemed to work pretty much out of the box. If the walmart people bothered to configure them right, it should all work. Now, there are some issues (mostly windows compatibility), but then they can just install their friends' copy of windows. I doubt that many would get returned.

    22. Re:Walmart is big enough to make this fly by Meshach · · Score: 1

      It will serve to reduce the current price on Windows systems (heck all systems) if a huge discount retailor like Wal-Mart starts seling them.

      My only hope is that they don't put many smaller computer shops out of business by underselling with a cheap PC (albeit low grade)

      --
      "Maybe this world is another planet's hell"
      Aldous Huxley
    23. Re:Walmart is big enough to make this fly by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 2

      I'm going along with the predicitons of the original post. Think of the number of technical support calls to various software companies which will end with "Oh my god!, you're running Lindows! I can't begin to tell you how unsupported you are!", along with small local shops being completely unable to provide support for software, ISPs trying to add new hardware like PCI DSL modems, and think of all the USB accessories these people are going to be screaming about. Printing alone should be hell.

      "I bought my Kodak camera/MP3 player/Scanner/Winprinter, plugged it in, and it didn't ask me for the CD. When I tried to install the drivers, the application crashed"

      Wow is this going to flop. It will be huge for the techies, but that's all.

    24. Re:Walmart is big enough to make this fly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, what a bunch of FUD!


      - lUser cannot figure out how to cut and paste from the Mozilla web browser to Abiword (a harsh welcome to Xwindows indeed).

      Um... it's called Ctrl-C, Ctrl-V. Just like windows. Are you an idiot or a troll?


      Worse, he never did figure out that to print he had to type "ghostview - | lpr -Pepson277 /dev/usb0" into every single app's preferences.

      Now I know you're a troll. Everybody knows there are print configuration tools for Windows. And for Linux. On my redhat 7.3 box, it's even a web-ified interface. I'm sure Lindows (KDE) has something similar.


      - lUser realizes that the "screen is ugly" (i.e. fonts suck)

      I love highly subjective comments that bear no connection to reality. My fonts do not suck. Neither do those of Lindows. Have you even LOOKED at a screenshot?

    25. Re:Walmart is big enough to make this fly by WNight · · Score: 2

      Shops won't support this? Heh. You don't understand market forces.

      I worked for a while at a shop that did primarily windows support. Nobody there liked MS or anything, but we did what people called and asked us to do. Some Mac stuff, some hardware problems for people who were running BeOS or Linux. Even some Amiga problems. We hardly ever turned anyone away.

      You think that if Walmart starts selling something in volume that shops won't start supporting it?

      Not bloody likely. They'll buy one of the systems, get used to it, and list it as another system they proudly support.

    26. Re:Walmart is big enough to make this fly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good thing it's kde-only then

    27. Re:Walmart is big enough to make this fly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, but I'm going to guess those weren't mass-market consumers you were doing technical support for, and that's what we're looking at here

    28. Re:Walmart is big enough to make this fly by PCTrauma · · Score: 1

      Send it over here and I'll test it with QuickTech. If it fails, get a refund

      --
      PCTrauma LLC
    29. Re:Walmart is big enough to make this fly by PacoTaco · · Score: 1
      Actually, Linux tends to run really well on cheap shitty hardware.

      That's probably because Linux was developed on cheap, shitty hardware. ;)

    30. Re:Walmart is big enough to make this fly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      right on.

      at this stage of development , you are not
      serious about linux on the desktop unless you
      run KDE.

      That could change with Gnome 2.0, but i have a feeling , kde will always be ahead by virtue of
      a head start if nothing else.

    31. Re:Walmart is big enough to make this fly by Buck2 · · Score: 1

      It's cheap RAM. I can't remember the manufacturer name.

      I wouldn't recommend buying it unless you were ready for a project.

      --

      As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
    32. Re:Walmart is big enough to make this fly by Buck2 · · Score: 1

      We bought it cheap. It doesn't deserve a refund. All of the 30 sticks lasted for a while before dying. That's the scariest part about the whole deal. Who would have thought that chips would be a short-term purchase?

      Whatever.

      Sorry about the delay in response.

      --

      As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
  17. I just hope... by GnomeKing · · Score: 1

    that they have replaced the old winmodem with a hardware one like they said they were going to

    Although I'm sure that the lads down at wallmart have tested lindows on their new machines properly

    ...

    ...

    ...

    right?

    p.s. I just noticed a little checkbox under my post... what is a Score +1 Bonus? and why did I get the option of having one?

  18. Will games be tested with wine now? by bluGill · · Score: 5, Insightful

    AFAIK, Lindows is based on wine. Wal-Mart customers will tend to buy a lot of games for their computer. Sounds to me like manufactures will soon find it a requirement to test their games with Lindows, and thus they will be wine compatable too.

    Not as good as native linux games, but a close second. If nothing else this could drive some real compitition to microsoft!

    If only it works... I'm not holding my breath yet.

    1. Re:Will games be tested with wine now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, emulated games work much better than native ones in most cases. Remember the Linux version of tribes 2? Well, you will not be able to play it in about 2 months, because they will release a new version for windows, thus making all the servers incompatible with linux clients. I'd rather have it "emulated" than outdated.

    2. Re:Will games be tested with wine now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the laugh of the day

    3. Re:Will games be tested with wine now? by morgajel · · Score: 5, Funny

      wtf are you talking about?! linux can run LOTS of games! gnibbles, xbill, majhong, xmine, nethack, etc....

      what? you want 3d games?

      nononono, remember- these are the same people who made FREECELL and SOLITAIRE popular. Once they go to the games section and see there are more than solitaire, freecell, mines, and hearts, they're heads will explode.

      no need for 3d:)

      --
      Looking for Book Reviews? Check out Literary Escapism.
    4. Re:Will games be tested with wine now? by Pi+Kapp+142 · · Score: 1

      That is one of the main things I am hoping for with this, is that people will start writing games for linux now, or at least porting them. Office apps are all right on Lindows. I think if the Lindows people get smart they will start getting it ready as a home entertainment center, with games, audio, and good DVD support.

    5. Re:Will games be tested with wine now? by GungaDan · · Score: 3, Funny
      "Lindows is based on wine."

      Is this post designed to further confuse the redneck masses, who also buy their wine at Walmart?

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    6. Re:Will games be tested with wine now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I honor of the new found linux demographic, i think they should be tested with BEER instead (perhaps a version nicknamed COORS).

    7. Re:Will games be tested with wine now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "they're heads will explode" is making MY head explode

    8. Re:Will games be tested with wine now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually your are very wrong.
      I've spent 3 months as subscriber to transgaming to get the latest winex versions with CD copy protection.

      I have no intention of renewing my subscription.

      First off, I have gotten very few games to work with it. I'm running decent hardware (1GHz CPU,512MB RAM,Geforce2-always on latest drivers) I've tried winex 1.03 - 2.1 on redhat 7.2,7.3 and mandrake8.2
      All I was really interested in was Diablo2. It did run, for about 7 minutes at a time - very unstable, and locks up X.
      Jedi Knight II works (slowly) - big suprise its based on cross platform engine (Q3) and uses OpenGL. Too bad Activision won't pull their head out their asses and give us some linux binaries so we can properly play the game.

      And as far as your lame Tribes2 example - yeah right, go ahead and try to run it in winex. It installs, even goes online for the patches, but it won't run. I know this because I wanted to make some of my own benchmarks of native vs. emulation.
      I also had the same results trying to get Unreal Tournament working through winex. However, the native versions of UT and Tribes 2 run great on my system.

      My Benchmarks:

      Tribes2 Native 60+ FPS
      Tribes2 winex 0 FPS

      UT 60+ FPS
      UT winex 0 FPS

      So my simple conclusion is that native linux versions of games run infinitly better than windows versions through winex.

    9. Re:Will games be tested with wine now? by Quarters · · Score: 2

      Games will be tested against something if it comprises a significant portion of the market for the game.

      Selling these machines online only, and at Wal*Mart.com to boot, will not make them a significant portion of any game's market.

    10. Re:Will games be tested with wine now? by apoupc · · Score: 1

      oh great...I hope WalMart doesn't mention that it runs on wine people are probably gonna demand for all-american beer instead

    11. Re:Will games be tested with wine now? by Jbrecken · · Score: 2

      Not having all those really cool 3D games might be a nice selling point if parents can think they're getting their kids a serious computer, not just a video game machine.

    12. Re:Will games be tested with wine now? by superpeach · · Score: 1

      Even more games here on the lindows site. All free to click-n-run warehouse members, whatever that means.

    13. Re:Will games be tested with wine now? by andyf · · Score: 1

      Microsoft will now be shipping Windows XP SE with the ability to run Linux executables. It will be called Binary Emulation for Executables at Runtime, or BEER.

      --

      Photos of bits of the past hiding in the present: afiler.com
    14. Re:Will games be tested with wine now? by surfcow · · Score: 2

      If they are selling it at Walmart, it's probably based on beer.

      (Sigh... just can't resist.)

      =brian

    15. Re:Will games be tested with wine now? by timbck2 · · Score: 1
      News Release. Feb 7, 2002 BENTONVILLE, AR (AP)

      Some Walmart customers soon will be able to sample a new discount item -- Walmart's own brand of wine. The world's largest retail chain is teaming up with E&J Gallo Winery of Modesto, Calif., to produce the spirits at an affordable price; in the $6-8 range.

      While wine connoisseurs may not be inclined to throw a bottle of Walmart brand wine into their shopping carts, there is a market for inexpensive wine, said Kathy Micken, professor of marketing at Roger Williams University in Bristol, R.I. She said: "The right name is important."

      So, with that in mind, here are the top 12 suggested names for Walmart Wine: 12. Chateau Traileur Doublewide
      11. White Trashfindel
      10. Big Red Gulp
      9. Grape Expectations
      8. Domaine Walmart "Merde du Pays"
      7. NASCARbernet
      6. Chef Boyardeaux
      5. Peanut Noir
      4. Chateau des Moines
      3. I Can't Believe It's Not Vinegar!
      2. World Championship Wriesling

      And the number 1 name for Walmart Wine...
      1. Nasti Spumante

      --
      Absurdity: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion. -- Ambrose Bierce
    16. Re:Will games be tested with wine now? by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      3d games???

      how about Q3,Q2,Q1,Wolfinstine3d,UT,SOF,heavy gearII,terminus.. i can go on for a while.

      dont give me shit that there are no games for linux (neverwinter nights) just because the overhyped windows based crack of the week isnt on linux doesnt mean it doesn't have games.

      Hey, super gamer.. 90% of the populace doesnt play/buy your beloved games until the hit the discount bin. and by then someone has it working under linux+wine...

      and I apologize for my profanity.. but It's friday and I am sick of people that pull FUD like this out of their butts and then get modded up.

      Linux has games, linux has LOTS of games.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    17. Re:Will games be tested with wine now? by zCyl · · Score: 2

      Is this post designed to further confuse the redneck masses, who also buy their wine at Walmart?

      Oh my... The frag rates are going to be disasterous once manufacturers start labelling games, "Works with wine."

    18. Re:Will games be tested with wine now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a joke you moron. Geez.

    19. Re:Will games be tested with wine now? by Chemical · · Score: 1

      Don't forget about my favorite wine, Electric Reindeer Chardonnay. This is actually a real wine. The company I work for sells it for $4.99 a bottle. Real high quality stuff.

    20. Re:Will games be tested with wine now? by morgajel · · Score: 2

      that wasn't sarcasm, I was serious.
      People love simple games- something linux has QUITE a few of.79 on the computer I'm currently sitting at from just installing KDE, GNOME, and BSD game packs.
      I've spent hours playing mahjongg, same gnome, and XJewel.
      I can't play 1st person shooters because they make me puke. my girlfriend is the same way, and so are her parents.

      Shall we also mention Freeciv? I can get her addicted to that for hours on end.

      BTW, I plan on getting neverwinter nights as well. I'm a BG2 fan, so I look forward to this.
      drop the seething rage long enough to see that I agree with you.

      --
      Looking for Book Reviews? Check out Literary Escapism.
    21. Re:Will games be tested with wine now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I can get her addicted to that for hours on end.

      Why don't you get her addicted to something useful, like giving you head?

      Scratch that, she's too busy sucking my big black 20-inch cock. Never mind.

  19. Windows v. Lindows by Rinisari · · Score: 4, Funny

    Redneck just got a computer...
    1997: I got Winders Ninedy Eight!
    2000: I got Winders Doodousand!
    2001: I got Winders EckPee!
    2002: I got Linders? What da hell is Linders?

    1. Re:Windows v. Lindows by Captain+Gingersnaps · · Score: 0

      Mods,

      For future reference, this is not funny. I don't mean that in an "I take offense at this" sense, but rather in the sense of universal standards of humor.

    2. Re:Windows v. Lindows by rehannan · · Score: 1

      I beg to differ, since at least one mod found it funny. Not everyone's sense of humor is identical to yours.

    3. Re:Windows v. Lindows by corp_dude · · Score: 1

      not even remotely funny.
      Why are these kind of posts even on here?

    4. Re:Windows v. Lindows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and your whining was even more useless than the original parent. STFU.

    5. Re:Windows v. Lindows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was stupid until i phonetically pronounced XP the way he spelled it.

      Winders Eck Pee is funny. The rest was stupid.

    6. Re:Windows v. Lindows by abroadst · · Score: 1

      Funniest post ever! Especially the part about unleashing the fyoorie. Very well done.

    7. Re:Windows v. Lindows by chaparrl · · Score: 1

      I agree. It isn't funny. It is offensive.
      Advocating the use of Linux while treating
      people with disdain will not convince many
      MS users to switch OS's. Linux is a
      superior OS, but a superior attitude will
      only impress people that perhaps they aren't
      smart enough to use it.

    8. Re:Windows v. Lindows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What???? A redneck with Windows 2000??? You prolly meant ME

  20. windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ... the customer takes the computer at home, grabs a copy of windows 2000 or xp from a friends, removes that crap lindows and installs windows on it ...

    1. Re:windows by dup_account · · Score: 1

      You know, all the bitching that the M$ whores do about Linux advocates immediately jumping in a saying something new from M$ sucks... Yet here, all of the posts so far have been from M$ whores saying how Lindows sucks, the name is confusing, and it's going to fail.... And it ain't even out yet.

    2. Re:windows by ceejayoz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      MS whores? No, the posts in here have been from Linux elitists. "Down with Microsoft, but screw the non-technical users, we don't want them" has been the general gist of the comments so far. No wonder Linux hasn't gotten much market share in the desktop market - the people who write it don't WANT average people to use it.

    3. Re:windows by Pi+Kapp+142 · · Score: 0

      But remember, the people that will buy these machines are not that technicly savvy. They would not know how to install windows on anything.

    4. Re:windows by pmz · · Score: 1

      This needs some clarification: the average Windows user is not a whore. The term "M$ whore" really applies to people who know better but still use Windows and justify it using so-called business cases. They have ideals but sell out to some ill-concieved notion that Windows programming/consulting is the only way to make money.

    5. Re:windows by Ozymandias_KoK · · Score: 1

      It's one of those problems where you have an elitist group who desperately want the public acceptance, but don't want to open up membership in their little private club, either.

      This obviously exlcudes the reasonable folk, of course. They however have a tendency to show by action, instead of preach with loud words. Too bad the idjits get all the attention instead.

    6. Re:windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No wonder Linux hasn't gotten much market share in the desktop market - the people who write it don't WANT average people to use it.
      Posts on Slashdot are very little, if any, indication of the thoughts and opinions of the people who actually steer major Linux projects. Most slashbots are full of hot air.

      Who has more of a say as to where Linux goes? A 15-year-old AC, or Alan Cox? A Joe Blow "Web Developer" posting on Slashdot to avoid work, or the author of your favorite window manager?
    7. Re:windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? They can't pop a CD in the CD-ROM? Windows NT 5.X is the 2nd easiest OS to install (Loonix ain't the first).

    8. Re:windows by lpontiac · · Score: 2
      ... the posts in here have been from Linux elitists ... Linux hasn't gotten much market share in the desktop market - the people who write it don't WANT average people to use it ...

      Do you honestly think many, if any, of the "elitists" making critical comments here write and contribute code to the kernel, or other programs that appear in distributions?

      Equating Slashbots and open source coders is about as fair as equating Walmart shoppers and rednecks.

    9. Re:windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > ... the customer takes the computer at home,
      >grabs a copy of windows 2000 or xp from a friends,
      >removes that crap lindows and installs windows on it ...

      I guess that the new Windows XP licensing and activation system would prevent this type of XP pirating.

    10. Re:windows by dup_account · · Score: 1

      Geez, mod up +2, for this crap!. It should have been marked -1 redudent. And it proves my point. The M$ whore(s) (someone modded this up) immediately attach a differing opinion as elitist. Power to the People!

    11. Re:windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think that "problem" has be "solved" already.

    12. Re:windows by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      'tis a good point, I apologize for my overgeneralization in my original post. I think a lot of people do see the elitism on sites like Slashdot and get a bit turned off to the whole thing...

    13. Re:windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most poeple posting on Slashdot are hardly the people that write stuff for Linux. And honestly I don't really think it matters one way or the other to the people who write most OS apps if Linux gets more Market Share. It might matter to companies like Red Hat, but not the average programer.

    14. Re:windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh its just as easy to install dickweed.

      if there arent any drivers for the hardware is just as hard

      nice try biznit

  21. "legions of rednecks?" by macsox · · Score: 2, Insightful

    so, first of all, nice stereotype. i guess all the fat, dateless, acne-scarred men on this site need something to chuckle about between visiting sites analyzing spock's deepest thoughts and pron.

    and second of all, why would you be so excited about these legions of rednecks using lindows? does nobody here see that computers today are the same as automobiles in the 50s and 60s -- that, back then, it was an elite group of youngsters that really got into the maintenance of and differences between various machines. now mechanics are a dime a dozen, and near the bottom rung of the social ladder, in most places. indeed, they are rednecks. santayana would know what warning to give.

    1. Re:"legions of rednecks?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > between visiting sites analyzing spock's deepest
      > thoughts and pron.

      Who's got Spock pron? Gimmee gimmee gimmee...

    2. Re:"legions of rednecks?" by revery · · Score: 1

      yes, but if all companies today had as many vehicles as they have computer systems, programs in development, and networks then mechanics would still be in high demand.

      Every company of any real size (12-15 PC's/vehicles in our analogy) would have to employ at least one or two just to take care of day to day issues.

    3. Re:"legions of rednecks?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No shit, what's with him holding out on us?

    4. Re:"legions of rednecks?" by billnapier · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nice Stereotype? Have you ever been to Walmart?

    5. Re:"legions of rednecks?" by @madeus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      fat, dateless, acne-scarred men

      I resent that!...I don't have acne scars, ha!

      Don't think the 'mechanic' analogy holds up though.

      The types of people who where Engineers who designed cars in the 50's are still designing cars and getting good paychecks of it (not as good as management, but still significantly above the national average).

      The types of young kids who simply goofed around with the cars were never on much money, they are akin to script kiddies and warez doodz who don't make any money now.

      Real Engineers are still Engineers and are as such worth money no matter what industry they are in (Automotive, Aerospace, Telecomunications, Computing).

      There is a difference between being able to fix or tinker with a car (or computer) and knowing how to design a car (or a computer). 'Mechanics' and 'Engineers' are not the same thing.

      People who write software, or maintain corporate networks or computing faclilites are in a whole different world for a guy who can mearly 'build his own PC' or 'install Linux'.

      When red necks and trailer trash start writing their own software at home, and parking rusty PC's out side their front door I'll get worried.

    6. Re:"legions of rednecks?" by Col.+Panic · · Score: 2

      mechanic==hardware tech - legions, indeed

      engineer==engineer - legions? bottom rung?

    7. Re:"legions of rednecks?" by brad3378 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      &gt now mechanics are a dime a dozen, and near the bottom rung of the social ladder, in most places.

      This is not true.
      One of my best friends in college made $50k right out of school, and was making a six figure salary at age 22

      Though this is not the norm, it isn't bad for a two year degree. Mechanics earn a lot more money than the old days, partly because now you need to know what you're doing, but mostly because there is a shortage of mechanics to fill positions. Not exactly a dime a dozen.

      Bullshit attitudes like yours towards mechanics are among the reasons why I am no longer a mechanic myself. Yes, there are some weasels out there, but saying that mechanics are rednecks, is like saying that all programmers are pizza faced, mountain dew drinking, slobs who don't shower. Take a moment to step off your elite pedestal and try becoming informed.

      --

    8. Re:"legions of rednecks?" by mushkalion · · Score: 1

      if all companies today had as many vehicles as they have computer systems, programs in development, and networks then mechanics would still be in high demand.


      You assume that computer systems in ten or twenty years will still require as much IT staff as they do now. Cars used to be much more unreliable...

    9. Re:"legions of rednecks?" by macsox · · Score: 1, Funny

      Take a moment to step off your elite pedestal and try becoming informed.
      no thanks!

    10. Re:"legions of rednecks?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so, first of all, nice stereotype. i guess all the fat, dateless, acne-scarred men on this site need something to chuckle about between visiting sites analyzing spock's deepest thoughts and pron
      So... uh... nice stereotype, yourself!

    11. Re:"legions of rednecks?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Auto mechanics bill $30 to $50 an hour for their time. That compares well with the average computer engineer. And the perception that they don't make a lot of money means they get to keep more of it. And it's not how much money you make, but how much money you get to keep.

      Airplane mechanics make even more money. Their rates start at $50/hr and go up from there. And those guys (the ones who are good) are even brighter than the good auto mechanic.

      The auto mechanic in my home town likes to fly planes. If you know anything about aviation, you learn pretty quick, it's expensive.

      In general, the good mechanics I've talked to, seem pretty bright, even if they're wearing clothes that are soaked in oil and grease.

    12. Re:"legions of rednecks?" by revery · · Score: 1

      I've noticed a shift in reliability from the 50's and 60's but it wasn't in a positive direction. ;)

    13. Re:"legions of rednecks?" by brad3378 · · Score: 1

      &gt Auto mechanics bill $30 to $50 an hour for their time

      Sorry... This is also incorrect.
      Auto Shops bill that much, not the mechanics. $30 sounds like the absolute low end, and even $50 sounds somewhat low to me. Due to overhead (shop equipment, office supplies, etc.), the mechanic will make about half of the flat-hourly rate. Most shops work on a flat-rate system which means labor times are calculated from a refrence book before the job is done. So if your 94 explorer has a leaky oil pan gasket, the job will be quoted about 6 hours (evacuate, A/C, remove engine, replace oilpan gasket, reinstall engine, charge A/C ). If your mechanic can do the job in 4 hours (not likely) he will still get paid for 6 hours. If he takes 12 hours, he still gets paid for only 6 hours (this is protection for the consumer). It's easy to see how the system encourages flat-rate mechanics to take shortcuts to earn more money.

      I cannot verify hourly rates for Airplane mechanics, but I can almost certainly guarantee that they do not work on a flatrate system. From what I understand, Airplane mechanics/techs must use a torque wrench for every nut, bolt, and screw that gets tightened, and then log the value in a log book, leading to very time consuming work. In a car about the worst thing that can happen is to have an engine that quits. In an airplane that can be fatal. Shortcuts are not encouraged, so Flat-Rate payment is not encouraged.

      --

    14. Re:"legions of rednecks?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did you I have acne?

    15. Re:"legions of rednecks?" by tshoppa · · Score: 2
      back then, it was an elite group of youngsters that really got into the maintenance of and differences between various machines. now mechanics are a dime a dozen, and near the bottom rung of the social ladder, in most places.

      That's a little unfair. A certified auto mechanic can pull down $70K to $90K without much problem in most markets. Now while that isn't as much as incompetent Java programmers were making last year, it's not a bad living and there's good job security.

      To get a good mechanics certification requires a lot of dedication and hard work. Not necessarily a lot of brains, but it doesn't hurt to have 'em.

    16. Re:"legions of rednecks?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Golden showers don't count.

    17. Re:"legions of rednecks?" by Catbeller · · Score: 2

      fat, dateless, acne-scarred white suburban twentysomethingmen, thank you very much, and we analyze Buffy's universe, not Star Trek (so last decade).

    18. Re:"legions of rednecks?" by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 1

      When red necks and trailer trash start writing their own software at home, and parking rusty PC's out side their front door I'll get worried.

      I live in Tennessee. I've seen rednecks write programs, both at work and at home.

      Yes, they have rusty PC cases out in the lawn.

      You better worry.

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    19. Re:"legions of rednecks?" by Uncle+Gropey · · Score: 1

      People who write software, or maintain corporate networks or computing faclilites are in a whole different world for a guy who can mearly 'build his own PC' or 'install Linux'. Or spell...

    20. Re:"legions of rednecks?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Yes, there are some weasels out there, but saying that mechanics are rednecks, is like saying that all programmers are pizza faced, mountain dew drinking, slobs who don't shower. Take a moment to step off your elite pedestal and try becoming informed.

      wait, so you're saying it IS accurate?

    21. Re:"legions of rednecks?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cough!, Knowing the crowd that is aircraft maintenance, bright is not what comes to mind, fright from awareness that they are the ones keeping big heavy objects from falling out the sky is.

    22. Re:"legions of rednecks?" by @madeus · · Score: 2

      Not true, dyslexia is very common in engineers, even writers suffer from it, like Scott Adams.

      Despite some excellent education, I'll never be able to spell correctly. This has no impact on my technical skill or employability, or my ability to get paid a high wage packet.

      However, explaining to people who don't know what dyslexia is, does take up lots of time as is *extremely* frustraiting. But you wouldn't know about that. (Ever tried spell checking EVERY SINGLE WORD you type or write?)

  22. Wal-Mart by johndou1 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The only reason Wal-Mart is doing this is because they can save a few buck over Windows boxes.

    Wal-Mart IS the Evil Empire and are destroying America one Super Center at a time.

    The Wal-Mart company in the largest company in the world.

    5 of the 10 richest people are Waltons.

    They force the suppliers they have to produce products off shore to make them cheaper.

    Don't shop at Wal-Mart of Sam's Club.

    1. Re:Wal-Mart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wal-Mart IS the Evil Empire and are destroying America one Super Center at a time.

      By selling us out to Red China... one redneck at a time.

      Hmm, Red China -- redneck, hmmm.....

    2. Re:Wal-Mart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you are admitting that the Linux community is basically anti capitalist and anti achievement. Go back to Berkley you moron.

  23. call be ignorant but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what exactly *is* Lindows? In everything I've read, I haven't been able to figure out what it is. Their site hardly gives a good explaination. Could someone give us the low-down?
    Thanks in advance.

  24. Rather than hoping by Sawbones · · Score: 2
    Is there any kind of polling or feedback - especially any whos results are public - to see what customers think about this? I'm certain if there is both sides it will spin it to their hearts content, it would be interesting to take a look at the raw numbers (so many customer support calls per unit sold, so many returns) and how they compare with both bare systems and windows pre-installed systems.

    It'll never happen of course, but it would be nice.

    --

    Ad in classifieds: Pandora's Box (no box) $5
  25. Them rednecks is gona be pissed. by Kenja · · Score: 2

    Cousin Cletus is gona blow a gasket if Deer Hunter wont run on these things.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  26. Not easy enough... by bilbobuggins · · Score: 4, Insightful
    after I first read about Lindows here I downloaded the ISO and gave it shot.
    To me, it didn't seem to be much more than KDE2 default with a pretty picture for the background. This is a problem. KDE default is NOT intuitive to Windows users.
    I am currently helping a co-worker who is curious about Linux learn her way around on one of the spare machines here. Her first question (w/ RH 7.3 default) was that even after 10 minutes of poking at stuff she could not find the taskbar buried in with all that other stuff. That was just the beginning.

    If you are going to cater to the Windows crowd you have to _really_ cater to them, not just change the icon theme.

    1. Re:Not easy enough... by uigrad_2000 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I am currently helping a co-worker who is curious about Linux learn her way around on one of the spare machines here. Her first question (w/ RH 7.3 default) was that even after 10 minutes of poking at stuff she could not find the taskbar buried in with all that other stuff. That was just the beginning.

      <persuasionspeech option=prolinux>
      Of course, that's user experience of someone who has probably been brought up using Windows. Of course, it won't be as easy to use for her.

      I just built a dual-boot system for my Aunt, Uncle, and three cousins. None of them have ever touched a computer for more than an hour in their life.

      I showed my cousins (girls ages 8, 10, and 12) how to use Windows, and then how to use linux. When I showed them how to browse from their home directory up two levels, and into the mounted windows partition, their first question was why they couldn't do the same thing from Windows! Youngsters are bright, and pick up these things very quickly!

      Before long, they had found ways to change their background (in KDE), to a background from the /dos1/windows directory, on their own! They never hit the "taskbar hiccup" you're referring to.

      The ten year old quickly decided that she was going to use gnome. Her reason? She liked using the "Cool: sunglasses" icon overlay for her documents, available with about 7 others by right clicking, and choosing properties on any icon. I didn't even know such stuff was in there!

      When newbies grab onto linux over windows because of eye candy, you can tell that the balance is getting ready to shift. Will it be far enough for us to feel it? I think I can finally answer that with a "likely".
      </persuasionspeech>

      --
      Free unix account: freeshell.org
    2. Re:Not easy enough... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No different than if you were learning Windows the first time.

    3. Re:Not easy enough... by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Where did you download the iso? I can't find it anywhere except by paying them $99 dollars which I won't do before I try it out.

    4. Re:Not easy enough... by Unregistered · · Score: 1

      I just looked at the screenshots and it looks like lindows has made K look like FWM95.

    5. Re:Not easy enough... by Arandir · · Score: 2

      Can't find the taskbar? Geez. It's right there in plain site in the exact same location it is under Windows!

      A) People who can't handle trivial modifications to their UI should stick with what they know and never switch.

      B) Why the hell are we catering to the Windows crowd anyway? Is this a religion where we have to convert everyone before time runs out and the world explodes?

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    6. Re:Not easy enough... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is a good point that is never brought up. People have no fears about learning a new Windows. XP really doesn't have much resemblence to previous Windows versions (without some tweaking) but people still use it without problems.

    7. Re:Not easy enough... by reallocate · · Score: 1
      ...user experience of someone who has probably been brought up using Windows.

      Just like almost everyone else on the planet who uses a PC. Your efforts to expose to people to Linux are admirable, but I doubt there is enough time left before the Sun goes nova to spread the word that way.

      Linux will follow the path carved by Unix 20 years ago -- the path to popular oblivion -- unless and until developers start producing innovative applications that run only on Linux and are not available on Windows or the Mac. If enough people walk into Walmart -- or anyplace else -- and buy (yes, buy!) an app that runs on Linux, someone will be quite happy to sell them a PC running Linux.

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    8. Re:Not easy enough... by GutBomb · · Score: 2

      xp operates exactly the same way. the colors are different and more candy looking but everything is still in the same place.

    9. Re:Not easy enough... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He either paid the $99 "just to try it out" or he's a liar, your choice.

    10. Re:Not easy enough... by greatsasuke · · Score: 1

      I agree completely. I'd categorize myself as an advanced Windows user (I was the guy on my floor everyone came to when they had a problem) and I've just installed Mandrake 8.2 on a triple-boot system to play around with.

      For the most part, I haven't gotten anywhere.

      I had three days to goof around with it before I had to start studying for finals, and in that time, I couldn't get sound working (Mandrake installer said it recognized my soundcard, too), get it to read CD-ROM discs, or do any number of tasks that are either automated or one-click chores in Windows.

      I wanted to try it out A.) Because I'm a CompSci major, I felt obligated and B.) Because I've been reading Slashdot regularly for a few years now and I wanted to see what all the fuss was about. So far, I haven't been impressed. And this is Mandrake, supposedly one of the easiest installations to use. :)

      All I'm saying is, I'm the guy people come to when they need help with computer things (maybe I should add a caveat that I only do Windows now...) and I couldn't honestly recommend a Lindows-based PC to anyone, because I might even have trouble using it.

    11. Re:Not easy enough... by Equinox · · Score: 1

      You obviously haven't used XP...very damn little is in the same place as before (at least in the default installation)...except the start button.

    12. Re:Not easy enough... by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Eh? Coming from DOS/Windows, I found KDE to be the ONE part of my linux install that worked "intuitively" -- ie. if I clicked something, it behaved more or less as expected, or at least in some manner that I could figure out without having to RTFM.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    13. Re:Not easy enough... by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Call us when you get the openbsd partition up.

  27. BUT DOES IT PLAY DEER HUNTER?!?!?!?!?!???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I ain't gettin' no cornputer that t'aint playing Deer Hunter.

  28. Good for Walmart. by ekephart · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Walmart is about the only US company I can think of that can actually take on MS. Walmart isn't really rooted in the technology industry so they don't stand to lose as much as say, Dell, from taking a stab at selling Lindows computers. I think most of us who know anything about MS know that the reason that Dell, HP, etc. etc... don't sell machines without Windows or even dual-boot machines with something other than two versions of Windows is because MS would revoke their license to sell Windows.

    Screw the "legions of rednecks" idea, I believe there are many people who are curious enough about other OSes to get an extra computer, especially since they are supposed to be cheap, from Walmart just to poke around. Who knows once the average Joe realized that their are other options maybe he'll download some Debian images and never use Windows again.

    Cheers to Walmart, good job guys.

    --
    sig
    1. Re:Good for Walmart. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Who knows once the average Joe realized that their are other options maybe he'll download some Debian images and never use Windows again."

      Excuse me for being so blunt but I've noticed this naivity alot among Linux users.
      The average computer user doesn't understand there is anything more to an OS than a blue desktop and a few icons. The average computer user finds zips hard enough to understand, let alone tarballs. The average computer can't figure out how to uninstall a piece of software unless there is an "uninstall" icon in that program's Star Menu group. The average user can't understand Window's directory stucture. The average user can't understand the difference between an .exe file and a .png.
      Please, please don't think that the other 95% of computer users, the normal people, are ever going to use Linux it its current state. They _do_not_ have your/our knowhow, knowledge psycholocal attitude and intelligence when it comes to computing. To them, anything beyond a couple of familiar icons is a mysterious netherland of 1s and 0s. I don't see The Average Joe using Lycoris any time soon, let alone Debian.

      Many would call this post a troll, but that further shows how little so many can comprehend what the average computer user is capible of.
      Microsoft and Apple understand all this, geeks do not.

    2. Re:Good for Walmart. by wytcld · · Score: 2
      Walmart isn't really rooted in the technology industry

      Walmart isn't identified with consumer technology, but in retailing they've long been known as the most aggressive embracers of tech. They were the first to force their suppliers to all install computer systems integrated with their own. It's a large part of how they've succeeded - the difference between Walmart and Kmart being that at Walmart what you went there for is in stock, because their computer connections with suppliers are really very effective and efficient.

      So if they brought in any of their own tech people to decide whether to sell Lindows, they brought in folks quite capable of assessing it as technology.

      On the other hand, Walmart will sell just about any cheap crap. When I lived in the mountains of North Carolina 20 years back, the Walmart there had a whole isle of bottles of different brands of "instant engine rebuilder" for your car. And this in an area where every teenage boy could really rebuild an engine. Who was buying this stuff then? The girls?
      ___

      --
      "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
    3. Re:Good for Walmart. by SomeoneYouDontKnow · · Score: 2

      I do agree with you, to a point. There are indeed quite a lot of users who don't have a clue as to how their computers work, and those people are going to use whatever they think is easiest. By and large, these are the same people who think AOL is the greatest Internet service available.

      But I digress. I do believe that there are users out there who are fairly computer literate who haven't tried Linux for one reason or another. Windows is a known quantity, and it works for them. Is that wrong? Not at all. As long as they get their work done, then they're happy. From their point of view, they have no reason to switch. Why should they switch and have to learn a totally new OS? I'm not defending Windows or attacking Linux here; I'm simply pointing out the reasons people stay with Windows. If you want them to use something else, then you have to convince them that whatever you want them to try can do something better than what they're using, and that "something" has to be a task that's important to them. Can Linux run a word processor better than Windows? How about a Web browser or e-mail client? These users may be quite capable of learning a new OS, but unless you can give them a compelling reason to change, they won't.

      --
      That light you see at the end of the tunnel might be from an oncoming train.
    4. Re:Good for Walmart. by Budgreen · · Score: 1

      Another way for them to boost sales would be to set the same computer net to it with M$ on it and show a price difference :)

      --
      The greatest right given is the right to be wrong...
    5. Re:Good for Walmart. by uigrad_2000 · · Score: 2
      The average computer user doesn't understand there is anything more to an OS than a blue desktop and a few icons. The average computer user finds zips hard enough to understand, let alone tarballs. The average computer can't figure out how to uninstall a piece of software unless there is an "uninstall" icon in that program's Star Menu group. The average user can't understand Window's directory stucture. The average user can't understand the difference between an .exe file and a .png.

      I have evidence that such assumptions aren't always right. That evidence is me.

      I played with computers a little as a kid, and never was interested in them. I learned DOS on a 386, and was turned off by how "klunky" it was.

      As a college freshman, I was reintroduced to the MS world. Things had changed a lot. Now documents were represented by icons, just like the old macs had done. Still, I couldn't grasp the concepts needed to become a "power user", or whatever the term was for people that wrote the programs everyone else used.

      My Junior year ('97), I transfered to the UofI, and was introduced to something called "Unix" for the first time, since student's email accounts were unix accounts. I met someone who had actually installed this thing called linux, about 8 months later.

      Soon, I had learned a lot. I made perl scripts for simple file manipulation, and eventually came to install linux on my PC. I learned that the "I don't get along with computers" line was wrong. I just didn't get along with MS-centric interfaces.

      I imagine there are many more people out there who are as confused as I was. They may look dumb, but it might just be that they are the type of people who prefer to see every application as a filter, that handles standard input, and generates standard output. That way, people who have different opinions about user interface can still use the same core programs!

      Once this notion "clicks" with the general public, they may realize that the only thing holding them back before was an un-intuitive interface. And then you see a total blundering fool (like the 1997 me) turn around.

      --
      Free unix account: freeshell.org
    6. Re:Good for Walmart. by k98sven · · Score: 1

      I think it's all about the Waltons wanting to
      beat Bill Gates on those "top 10 richest" lists..

    7. Re:Good for Walmart. by Dryth · · Score: 1

      Walmart is about the only US company I can think of that can actually take on MS.

      I think "take on" is a little bit too strong in this case, as it implies that Walmart went out of their way to make some form of statement against Microsoft.

      After Walmart's attempt at the "OS-less PC", I think it's obvious that they're simply interested in being able to pursue lower pricetags.

      I doubt they're intent on making a pro-Linux statement either, otherwise they'd be packaging a more common Linux distribution. I'm thinking they're just going for the low-cost compromise.

      Last I checked Walmart was one of them big evil corporations that we tend to frown upon hereabouts? Their means of establishing their building monopoly is beating out the competition's prices. Lindows is just another piece in the puzzle.

  29. ignore that p.s. by GnomeKing · · Score: 2

    It would help if I read the FAQ before asking :D

  30. heh.. by jglow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think some of you are expressing concern because you don't want the mass public using anything but Windows. When everyone starts moving in on your elite OS, it no longer is the cool thing to use, so you must find something else to move on to....

    --


    There's no "I" in Linux.. err..
    1. Re:heh.. by Nighttime · · Score: 1

      I know of people who have switched to *BSD because they didn't like the fact that Linux was becoming more mainstream.

      One of my friends actively searches out the most obscure/minority OSes he can just to be different.

      --
      I've got a fever and the only prescription is more COBOL.
    2. Re:heh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what *BSD is for. Long live Berserkeley!

    3. Re:heh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who are more concerned with their image than getting things done are really cool, like your friend. Tell him to grow the fuck up.

    4. Re:heh.. by Unknown+Lamer · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think some of you are expressing concern because you don't want the mass public using anything but Windows. When everyone starts moving in on your elite OS, it no longer is the cool thing to use, so you must find something else to move on to....

      Maybe now people will start using the Hurd :)

      --

      HAL 7000, fewer features than the HAL 9000, but just as homicidal!
    5. Re:heh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a linux user, I am very excited to see this happening. I have been wishing for this for a long time.

      I sincerely doubt that any linux, lindows, kde (or whatever) users are concerned over:
      >When everyone starts moving in on your elite OS,
      >it no longer is the cool thing to use, so you
      >must find something else to move on to....

      Get a grip! If anything we are excited because it is very possible (if this does not blow up in Wal-Mart's face) that vendors such as Dell, Gateway etc. will follow suit if WalMart is successful.

      If this happens, and the sales warrant it, you will start seeing lots of software companies porting to *nix. This can only make life better for all of us.

      No one is sad to see this day come, oh contrare, we are unequivically ecstatic about it.

      We don't use linux because it is cool, we use it because it runs better. Anyone who doesn't want people using computers that run better needs their head examined.

      This could push *nix to the critical mass required for industry wide support and recognition. "Real" ports of windows applications will surely surpass their windows ported counterparts running in WINE, in terms of performance, reliability, and *coolness*.

      As an example, Loki games running on linux, natively, surpass their windows counterparts by a wide margin in terms of performance. I can run Descent 3 in 1600x1200 on my box in linux, using OpenGL, smoothly, like video. The windows version struggles with 1024x768 using ActiveX.

      Unfortunately the Loki folks were way ahead of their time and went belly up, for lack of sales. I hope they reincarnate. They did a damn good job.

      l8,
      AC

    6. Re:heh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What version of ActiveX are you running?

      Maybe you should flash your X-Box. Then maybe X will work better.

      This post was brought to you by the misuse of terminology.

    7. Re:heh.. by Hollinger · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's where MacOS X comes in. You know you want it.

    8. Re:heh.. by Arandir · · Score: 1

      Who says I'm using Lindows?

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    9. Re:heh.. by mikethegeek · · Score: 2

      "I think some of you are expressing concern because you don't want the mass public using anything but Windows. When everyone starts moving in on your elite OS, it no longer is the cool thing to use, so you must find something else to move on to...."

      VERY well said!!

      I see it this way... A corporation that I have long despised (there isn't a lot to like about Wal-Mart) is advancing something I truly believe in.

      Why?

      Because it's in their best interest. Wal-Mart can sell a FULLY functional PC based on a xNix OS for $299. There is NO WAY any MS machine can sell with the same hardware for the same price, unless MS starts giving away XP Home (and with how shitty it is, compared to XP Pro, which is actually decent, maybe they SHOULD), is not going to happen.

      MS could get squeezed out in the middle. Linux is encroaching on the server market. This is partly because Linux has Unix roots, while MS approaches servers with a desktop mentality.

      But, even for sake of argument, you call Linux and .NET server equals in quality and functionality, they are NOT equal in price.

      Especially when you factor in the possibility that MS's private army, the BSA, will pick YOUR company for a stormtrooper raid.

      Same thing on the low end. All the pundits tell us that the desktop PC as we know it today is an endangered species, as far as being a mass market item.

      What will replace them? Something that more resembles a network/gaming thin client. In other words, a cheap, simplified, integrated PC.

      Linux has the advantage that it cares not whether it runs on a 15 year old 386, or a brand new Itanium.

      On such cheap machines, price of any component becomes a premium.

      Linux: Cheap. Free or nearly free.
      Windows: Adds at least $100 to the cost of the machine.

      While price isnt' everything, it IS a compelling advantage for any product on the marketplace. IF these things sell, I wonder how long before IBM, Dell, HPaQ, Gateway, et all are FORCED to enter this market?

      Windows, no matter WHAT price MS sells it for will always make a PC more expensive than to put Lindows or any other Linux on it.

      So, what I see happening, is the possibility that Linux on the server plus Linux on the thin client MIGHT squeeze MS into a shrinking middle market.

      --
      === The price of freedom is eternal vigilance
    10. Re:heh.. by fliplap · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      Please take a moment to back up your statement that XP Home is "shitty" compared to XP Pro. What exactly makes it "shitty" and what makes Pro decent?

    11. Re:heh.. by pjrc · · Score: 2
      Linux has the advantage that it cares not whether it runs on a 15 year old 386, or a brand new Itanium.

      The kernel perhaps, but the instance of Mozilla (0.9.7) that I am using right now while writing this message has allocated 62 megabytes of RAM, approx 50 megs is resident and 12 megs swapped out at this very moment.

      Xfree86 has allocated 70 megabytes (26 megs swapped out). It is supporting Mozilla with 9 windows open, 7 gnome terminals, and a couple windows associated with "seyon" (an old terminal emulator I'm using with a serial port attached device).

      The font server is using 15 megs, sawfish is using 7 megs, and a variety of gnome applets each show multiple megabytes of ram. Admittedly, some of this is shared memory for libraries, but the point remains...

      The original slackware 1.x of '94 to '95 would run on an old 386, but today's KDE and Gnome based distros don't have a chance!

      ... and just to be picky, 15 years ago was the summer of 1987, before the 386 chip entered the market.

    12. Re:heh.. by jglow · · Score: 1

      I see it happen all the time. I first noticed this sort of attitude when discussing music with people. Many are on the hunt for anything not mainstream just so they aren't following suit. Sadly, it has nothing to do with whether they like the music or not.

      I can see the trend with operating systems, too. Some people put all functionality and reasoning aside, and base thier choice on what makes them look cool.

      --


      There's no "I" in Linux.. err..
    13. Re:heh.. by krammit · · Score: 1

      Entirely true. All my friends refer to me as "the cool one" because I use Linux. The guy using the windows machine is "the popular one". My buddy who has his CNE is "the shy one". We're like the Backstreet Boys of computing. Now they're gonna start calling me "the pretty one" or something. I wonder how OBOS is coming along...

      --
      "Watch your cornhole, bud."
    14. Re:heh.. by Akoma+The+Immortal · · Score: 1

      Nice one.

      But seriously, don't laugh.

      This is how Linux gain mind and now market share. By providing a new technolic challenge to an elite group of hackers.

      You prediction migh become true in a non so distant future.

      When will we hable to by smallform factor PC from Walmart. I want one now :)

      --
      assert(expired(knowldege)); core dump
    15. Re:heh.. by zBoD · · Score: 1

      I just can't believe that this was moderated as +5, Insightful.

      BoD

      --
      BoD
    16. Re:heh.. by jglow · · Score: 1

      me either.

      --


      There's no "I" in Linux.. err..
    17. Re:heh.. by fxncnu · · Score: 1

      Nah, there's always ways to go Elite. For example: Gentoo Blackbox Vim ... to name a few. Maybe Lnux won't be the "Elite" of the future, but there'll always be something there :-)

    18. Re:heh.. by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      of course we are afraid... we cant let this happen until HURD is finished.

      Sheesh, get with the program people!

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    19. Re:heh.. by cybercuzco · · Score: 2

      Yeah, like OS X, nobodys using that!

      --

    20. Re:heh.. by reallocate · · Score: 1
      Right. Ever notice the frequent use of "we" around here in reference to Linux users? A substantial number of people seem to pin a great deal of their personal self-image on their use of a particular piece of software, and the ensuing belief that they belong to an elite group that has secret knowledge unattainable by the Ignorant Masses. The same thing happened in the OS/2 and Amiga worlds.

      Want the best piece of software possible? Want your favorite software to dominate the commercial world? Well, pick one, 'cause you probably can't have both.

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    21. Re:heh.. by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

      So are you saying we should expect HURD to be getting real good real fast?

    22. Re:heh.. by Reziac · · Score: 2

      I have personally observed this phenomenon with other "cool" things (including source code projects), and you have a valid point. If everybody's doing it, it's not "special" or "unique" anymore, and those who want ivory-tower isolation will move on to some more-esoteric OS (whining all the way about how popularity "ruined" linux). To which I say, good riddance, no one needs the hassle of dealing with zealots and bigots. Linux itself will be the better for it.

      (Watch this get modded "flamebait" :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  31. Shells Rednecks compile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Hey Y'all, Jeb just set up a beowolf cluster.

    1. Re:Shells Rednecks compile by Jonny+Ringo · · Score: 1

      Say What's Jeb's IP address?
      "Why its just one number down from trailerhome.com Zeek"

  32. A better argument for "not for pirated Windows" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    As some are likely to argue. But this move clearly indicates that Walmart fears no one. It is almost an act of dominion that no supplier tells Walmart what to do.

  33. *omg* is it even out of beta already? by Idaho · · Score: 4, Informative

    Maybe I missed something...but last time I checked Lindows was still in beta stage, and with good reason too!

    From my experience, they might be combining MS-like stability and security (running everything as root etc.) with Linux-like usability*, resulting in a horribly unusable OS - for which Linux will most probably get the blame by mainstream reporters. Ah well, we'll see.

    Walmarts idea is probably something like this: they can save money on the computers this way, and they probably don't really care about what their customers use it for (do they have a reason to? Do they have to offer support etc.?), so that would explain things....

    * usability for Joe Avg. User, e.g. consistent GUI's and stuff, you know what I mean...combining Wine and KDE and X will not get you a very consistent UI experience probably....

    --
    Every expression is true, for a given value of 'true'
    1. Re:*omg* is it even out of beta already? by cmorriss · · Score: 1
      From my experience, they might be combining MS-like stability and security (running everything as root etc.) with Linux-like usability*, resulting in a horribly unusable OS - for which Linux will most probably get the blame by mainstream reporters. Ah well, we'll see.

      More like Wine stability combined with Linux-like usability which will result in a horribly unusable OS. Wine is the real problem here. It is not even beta much less ready to be used by Joe Avg. User. Even if Lindows makes it easy to run Windows programs with Wine it doesn't matter since a vast majority of them will simply not run correctly.

      --
      10 minutes working on a sig. What a waste.
    2. Re:*omg* is it even out of beta already? by ocbwilg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Walmarts idea is probably something like this: they can save money on the computers this way, and they probably don't really care about what their customers use it for (do they have a reason to? Do they have to offer support etc.?), so that would explain things....

      I think that this is the real reason. They don't want to catch 10 kinds of hell from MS about selling "naked" PCs, so they throw Lindows on it instead. Net cost to them? Nothing. Bitching from MS about selling naked PCs? None. Net loss to a consumer who wants a naked PC in order to install a pirated copy of Windows? None. Bitching from MS about selling PCs with a competitor's product? None, if MS doesn't want to put a neon sign over their collective heads that reads "illegal use of monopoly power".

      Besides, what likely is going to happen is that a user will get it home with Lindows, find out that it isn't Windows and it won't run whatever game they want to play, and then they'll come back to WallyWorld to buy a full copy of Windows XP. That's a bigger sale to WalMart and a bigger sale for MS. The only people who really have anything to lose from it are the Lindows folks who stand to gain a fair amount of negative press if they piss off consumers. Instead of looking like a company that is trying to bring Linux to the mainstream user with an easy-to-use compatible Windows-like interface they run the risk of looking like someone peddling a cheap knock-off that is trying to trade on Microsoft's name.

    3. Re:*omg* is it even out of beta already? by Scooby+Snacks · · Score: 1
      They don't want to catch 10 kinds of hell from MS about selling "naked" PCs, so they throw Lindows on it instead.

      Interesting idea, but Wal*Mart is still selling the "PCs Without Windows".

      --

      --
      Runnin' around, robbin' banks all whacked on the Scooby Snacks...
  34. I hope they harden them. by Irvu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I can just imagine millions of these things selling widely. Then every single one being hacked by one group with the same root exploit. Think of the headlines "Wal-Mart facilitates domestic terrorism" "Internet Weakened by Linux manchines" etc. In some ways it's kind of what the ADTI people want.

    The sum of all Lindows fears.

    1. Re:I hope they harden them. by Software · · Score: 1
      WTF? If this happens (and I think it will), would anyone notice after several similar stories of how Microsoft has "facilitated domestic terrorism"? Have you seen any stories with such inflammatory headlines (/. excepted)?

      I'm worried that Microsoft would steal Wal-Mart's thunder by claiming that remote root exploits and worms were Microsoft's innovations. I don't believe Microsoft has patented them, though.

    2. Re:I hope they harden them. by kubrick · · Score: 1

      Yes, and if those hackers try hard enough, it could be almost as bad as Code Red & Nimda.

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    3. Re:I hope they harden them. by dzym · · Score: 2

      Doesn't Lindows just give you a XFree86 session running as uid(0)?

    4. Re:I hope they harden them. by Kris+Warkentin · · Score: 2

      When's the last time you saw X running as anything OTHER than root?

      --

      In Soviet Russia, hot grits put YOU down THEIR pants.
    5. Re:I hope they harden them. by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      Remote root exploits and worms were common in the Unix world way before people at Microsoft even coupled two PCs together.

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
  35. So Many Questions by namespan · · Score: 2

    Will this Redneck Linux outsell Redhat Linux? Will people remember there are other distributions?

    Will pictures of a penguin urinating replace those travesties of Bill Watterson's creations that are now ubiquitous?

    If it crashes a lot, will anyone notice?

    --
    Libertarianism is rich wolves and poor sheep playing gambler's ruin for dinner.
  36. Could Put Lindows/Wal-Mart in a Sitcky Spot by goldspider · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "To think of the legions of rednecks who could now possibly be running Lindows instead of Windows..."

    It sounds funny, but just wait till they buy and try to install something made for Windows. Much to their surprise, it won't work, and they'll be calling up Wal-Mart asking them what kind of shinanigans they were trying to pull.

    Now I haven't seen the packaging for these Lindows PCs, but I'd be willing to bet that some people COULD be confused into believing they're in fact buying a Windows PC. When they do discover their error, they'll think they were suckered into buying some kind of like a cheap knock-off (don't have the exact appropriate Simpsons quote).

    If that happens, it's probably not the kind of PR that Lindows is looking for. Both Lindows and Wal-Mart have to be very careful to make sure the differences between Windows and Lindows are clearly explained.

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    1. Re:Could Put Lindows/Wal-Mart in a Sitcky Spot by BigBir3d · · Score: 3, Informative

      You mean like running IE or Office or something?

    2. Re:Could Put Lindows/Wal-Mart in a Sitcky Spot by Magila · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      they'll think they were suckered into buying some kind of like a cheap knock-off

      And rightly so, I'd say that's exactly what Lindows is.

    3. Re:Could Put Lindows/Wal-Mart in a Sitcky Spot by the_rev_matt · · Score: 5, Informative
      The site quite clearly at the top in the first paragraph says it does *not* come with Windows.
      Microtel PCs with Lindows OS These computers do not ship with Microsoft Windows. They ship with an exciting new UNIX based Operating System (OS) named Lindows. This exciting new OS delivers the stability of UNIX with the ease of Windows and the ability to run most Microsoft programs. These computer systems are a perfect low cost alternative to computers preloaded with Microsoft Windows.
      --
      this is getting old and so are you

      blog

    4. Re:Could Put Lindows/Wal-Mart in a Sitcky Spot by bitflip · · Score: 1

      If enough people are confused, would that lend credence to MS' assertion that Lindows violates the Windows trademark?

    5. Re:Could Put Lindows/Wal-Mart in a Sitcky Spot by Tim+Macinta · · Score: 4, Insightful
      It sounds funny, but just wait till they buy and try to install something made for Windows. Much to their surprise, it won't work, and they'll be calling up Wal-Mart asking them what kind of shinanigans they were trying to pull.

      Why would they assume it's a problem with Lindows and not with the program they are trying to install? Think about it this way - if they were running Windows, bought a copy of Photoshop, and unsuccessfully tried to install it, would they call Microsoft or Adobe? They would call Adobe, of course. Let's just hope they use the same logic with Lindows. If enough people do this with software that breaks under Wine, the companies publishing that software will eventually figure out that it's worth the extra day or two to debug their software under Wine before shipping it.

    6. Re:Could Put Lindows/Wal-Mart in a Sitcky Spot by TheAwfulTruth · · Score: 2

      Oh yeah! Wait till they call Adobe and claim that they installed Photoshop on a "Lindows" PC. How much tech support do you think adobe will give? Some thing along the lines of "I'm sorry sir, our products only work on Macintosh or Windows computers. I cannot give you any help. Please call your computer manufacturer."

      And it's not a matter of one or two days to get something working on a 1/10 API/Library subset of windows. Many MANY programs will simply never work. And a lot of these are the types of programs that people buying these Lindows machines use. I.e. GAMES.

      The only TINY bit of hope is that maybe after walmart sells 10,000,000 of these machines that there may be enough of a Linux base that more game programmers will port to native Linux. But that's a big if, if people can't run their apps they HAVE or can BUY now on the machine like Walmart says they can. (And as most people her point out. THat is simply not the case.)

      --
      Contrary to popular belief, coding is not all free blow-jobs and beer. Those things cost MONEY!
    7. Re:Could Put Lindows/Wal-Mart in a Sitcky Spot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These computers do not ship with Microsoft Windows. They ship with an exciting new UNIX based Operating System (OS) named Lindows. This exciting new OS delivers the stability of UNIX...

      I'm excited.

    8. Re:Could Put Lindows/Wal-Mart in a Sitcky Spot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To whoever modded this -1 Overrated, thanks alot. You must be very proud of yourself for doing Slashdot such a valuable service.

    9. Re:Could Put Lindows/Wal-Mart in a Sitcky Spot by Tim+Macinta · · Score: 2
      Oh yeah! Wait till they call Adobe and claim that they installed Photoshop on a "Lindows" PC.

      And why would they mention this? This little piece of information will probably be something that the Adobe tech support might figure out after some painful q and a, but if the user knows enough to be this succinct in their problem description, they will likely already know what the problem is. My point was that it would be a pain in the neck for Adobe, not Walmart.

      The only TINY bit of hope is that maybe after walmart sells 10,000,000 of these machines that there may be enough of a Linux base that more game programmers will port to native Linux.

      I think there plenty of other scenerios where things turn out well. Take this one for example: consumers realize that Lindows + Open Office + The Gimp = $99 while Windows + MS Offfice + Photoshop > $1,000. Even if no games worked in Lindows (the worst case scenerio from your argument), there are still plenty of people who would be happy with a such an office productivity package.

    10. Re:Could Put Lindows/Wal-Mart in a Sitcky Spot by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 2
      It sounds funny, but just wait till they buy and try to install something made for Windows. Much to their surprise, it won't work, and they'll be calling up Wal-Mart asking them what kind of shinanigans they were trying to pull.

      Actually, that's NOT what the customer will do - they'll try to call the software company that MADE the product, whose 800# is right in the user manual and ask why the software isn't running. This software manufacturer will have one of a few unpalatable choices...

      He can tell the user to FO, causing user to return said package, causing WalMart to return said package , reducing revenues for himself.

      He can blame WalMart for selling "ersatz" Windows, getting WalMart PO'ed at him about finking them out to the user, ultimately losing the distro channel.

      They can get a copy of Lindows and rewrite their code so that it runs under Wine (maybe even contribute to Wine to get their software to run).

      All of this happens because the little software fish (other than King Daddy MSFT, itself) ain't got the legs to run away from Big Wally's distro behemoth. They'll cave because the first law of business is "Cash is king" and Wally makes the cash for these guys.

      Of course, all of this is predicated on the user's being able to get through to customer service in the first place...

      --
      That is all.
    11. Re:Could Put Lindows/Wal-Mart in a Sitcky Spot by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      "the ability to run most Microsoft programs"

      They should be careful, this is a measurable feature. If it runs less than 51% of Microsoft programs, it's false advertising.

    12. Re:Could Put Lindows/Wal-Mart in a Sitcky Spot by ocbwilg · · Score: 2

      Actually, that's NOT what the customer will do - they'll try to call the software company that MADE the product, whose 800# is right in the user manual and ask why the software isn't running.

      It's obvious that you've been using Open Source for awhile. It's been years since I've seen a toll-free support line in a shrinkwrap software manual. There are plenty of 1-900 numbers though...

      This software manufacturer will have one of a few unpalatable choices...>

      He can tell the user to FO, causing user to return said package, causing WalMart to return said package , reducing revenues for himself.>

      He can blame WalMart for selling "ersatz" Windows, getting WalMart PO'ed at him about finking them out to the user, ultimately losing the distro channel.>

      They can get a copy of Lindows and rewrite their code so that it runs under Wine (maybe even contribute to Wine to get their software to run).


      You're overly optimistic with your assessment I think. What is most likely to happen is that the user will spend a little bit of time and money getting in contact with the application vendor. The vendor's call center rep will ask which version of Windows they are running. The user will say "Lindows OS." The call center rep will say "I've not heard of that...is it Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows Me, Windows NT, Windows 2000, or Windows XP?" The user will say "Neither," and the call center rep will say "We only support this program on version of Microsoft Windows, I can't help you. Thanks for calling."

      You see, Lindows may be a great idea. It may even be a great product. But it's not Windows and until the system requirements on the application's box say "runs on Lindows OS" then it doesn't matter how Windows-like it is.

    13. Re:Could Put Lindows/Wal-Mart in a Sitcky Spot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You underestimate the bone-headedness of the unwashed masses. I could totally see Jethro calling up MS with his Adobe woes (although I doubt that the WalMart demographic would be using costly, pro-grade software like Photoshop in the first place... these are the people who use crap like Greeting Card Maker or whatever else is either bundled with a printer or costs $19.99 at WalMart!) I could even see him calling up the electronics department at his local WalMart for help... an situation that would make your average tier-1 tech support nightmare look like a 3-week spa vacation!

    14. Re:Could Put Lindows/Wal-Mart in a Sitcky Spot by skt · · Score: 2

      Nobody is going to test their software to see whether or not it works under WINE. If they are concerned with linux compatibility, they should release native binaries. Redhat has a much better chance of success than Lindows IMHO, lindows is going the emulation route which will eventually lead to problems, user frustration, etc. Redhat distributes WINE as well, but it doesn't make a big deal about it as the compatibily with big Windows applications (Access, Photoshop, IE, OE, etc) isn't very good.

      I haven't had a chance to use Lindows or see a good review of this walmart PC yet, but I'm guessing that IE's performance under Lindows isn't very good. You would be better off running something like mozilla or galeon. Walmart took a step in the right direction going with a linux-based operating system, but I think they should have gone one step further and gone with Redhat...

    15. Re:Could Put Lindows/Wal-Mart in a Sitcky Spot by Paolomania · · Score: 1

      it's worth the extra day or two to debug their software under Wine before shipping it

      BWAAAAHAAHHAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA! Please mod parent up as +1 Funny. Obviously no one would actually believe that properly debugging and testing an application like Photoshop under Wine would only take an "extra day or two". BWAAAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAHA!

    16. Re:Could Put Lindows/Wal-Mart in a Sitcky Spot by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      Yes, I also thought, "shouldn't they have said 'many' there?".

      Also, it might be unclear what exactly they mean with "Microsoft programs". Technically, it means things like Microsoft Notepad and Microsoft Internet Explorer and such. End-users might think it says that most Windows programs will run, and might feel cheated when they discover this is not the case.

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
  37. Linux doesn't win. by Telastyn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Selling people Linux machines with Wine isn't a win for Linux. You still have to shell out probably more cash for Office than for the machines themselves, and it's probably not going to work very well, turning even more people away from "things that are different".

    Sure this might be a loss for Microsoft, but it's certainly not a win for Linux.

    1. Re:Linux doesn't win. by mrfiddlehead · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The average FCN doesn't need Office. Open office is MORE than enough. As soon as the Microsoft apologists get that through their thick bloody heads we will be able to move on and away from this nonsense about office.

      About the only issue that I can see for the average home user is the problem with Microsoft's proprietary streaming media formats, and financial software. But if we can avoid using quicken or money with a usable version of gnucash then we're all going to be better off anyway.

      --
      :wq
    2. Re:Linux doesn't win. by cmorriss · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Selling people Linux machines with Wine isn't a win for Linux. You still have to shell out probably more cash for Office than for the machines themselves, and it's probably not going to work very well, turning even more people away from "things that are different".

      Umm.. Yeah it is a win. People aren't going to go out and buy MS Office if there's already this nice FREE Open Office program pre-installed that they can use. That goes for many of the other programs that Lindows comes with.

      The fact is, people won't get it unless they at least have the option to run windows programs. If more people start using Lindows, they will certainly be more apt to use Linux programs since they'll run better. As more people use Linux programs, more companies will support the operating system.

      Isn't giving people options what Linux is all about?

      --
      10 minutes working on a sig. What a waste.
    3. Re:Linux doesn't win. by pstreck · · Score: 1

      God sometimes i think the moderators are braindead, insightfull, no igornant is what that comment is. This is a win for GNU/Linux as an operating system, to have a commodity PC ship with a GNU/Linux operating system preinstalled is a very very very big deal. Why would they have to buy Microsoft Office? Open Office is pre installed with lindows i believe. No you incorrect, this is a win for linux, a big win.

      --

      Later,
      Phil
    4. Re:Linux doesn't win. by Telastyn · · Score: 1

      Open office may be more than enough, but it's certainly not remotely equal to MS Office. It does not have the polish, and it does not have the usability. There are so many little annoyances, inconsistancies within programs, or just things that don't work.

      Though for most home users Outlook Express/Netscape and Notepad/(is there a gnomepad or something? I just use vi...)

    5. Re:Linux doesn't win. by Telastyn · · Score: 1

      They will be more apt to use oss solutions like OpenOffice, though despite massive gains, it's still a mediocre replacement, and in my experience, buggy and incomplete.

    6. Re:Linux doesn't win. by Telastyn · · Score: 1

      Certainly it's a big deal, though this will not win over many people who are not already Linux users. Open Office is not "ready for grandma" as it were. People will get MS Office because (to them) it works better.

      If Joe nobody gets a Lindows machine they're going to use it like a windows machine, with windows software on Wine, except they're going to wonder why their windows software doesn't always work quite right.

      They will probably notice that they don't have to reboot nearly as often, and that their machine is more stable.... maybe.

    7. Re:Linux doesn't win. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you haven't used OO enough yet. I've used OO for 6 months now, and it does more than MS Office 2000 does. And it does it for free. Trust me, writing documents at work that need to be easy to change all the time, distribute in any given format, and all free of charge, I'm not going back to MS Office.

    8. Re:Linux doesn't win. by DrNibbler · · Score: 1
      Selling people Linux machines with Wine isn't a win for Linux. You still have to shell out probably more cash for Office than for the machines themselves, and it's probably not going to work very well, turning even more people away from "things that are different".
      Every Linux install is a victory for Linux. One more machine runing the OS. It doesn't matter what software is being run on the box. Linux machines with Wine is a win for Linux .

      Do you mean to say "Selling people Linux machines with Wine isn't a win for OpenSource"? The Linux Movement != Open Source Movement. They are related but not the same thing. At the end of the day all the Linux Movement should care about is installed copies of Linux. They shouldn't care if you're running Open Office, Star Office or MS-Office under Wine.
      --
      Sean.OutaHere()
    9. Re:Linux doesn't win. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing that could stop Linux is Microsoft. You fail to realize that Linux is now a juggernaut of almost irresistable force but the Microsoft juggernaut disguises that fact. If Microsoft weakens the only containment on Linux will be swept away. When MS loses Linux wins.I mean what else is in its way? Solaris? MacOS? PalmOS, or a BSD? People kept buying Window9X and it sucked and I doubt Lindows could do worse. If Linux has some usability problems than fear not because Microsoft has them well trained.

    10. Re:Linux doesn't win. by prgammans · · Score: 1

      People aren't going to go out and buy MS Office if there's already this nice FREE Open Office program pre-installed that they can use.

      Well I would of agreed with you until I was asked to re-install a friend machine. After getting windows* installed, I came to put office back on and then found they didn't have any office CD's umm, it turns out another friend had installed it.

      Ok i say i got a copy of Openoffice.org. It'll will open and edit you word documents not a problem... but no for some strange reason she buys officeXP which min spec if higher than her machine and then asks if I'll install that.

      It turns out she happy to pay as she has heard that it is the best choice** and it what she has used before.

      *their choice.
      **not from me I'll add

    11. Re:Linux doesn't win. by 13Echo · · Score: 2

      A lot of average users aren't dumb, and they know what to expect. I know of many Windows users that are interested in this Linux thing that they keep hearing about, but they haven't had the ability to check it out. The average user doesn't try to install Windows software on a Mac, or vice-versa. You would assume that they would get the concept with this too.

      As long as they know that it is going to be somewhat different and will take some time to learn and adapt to, I think that they will realise that the costs outweigh the benefits of having MS Software on it at all. This is a beneficial tool for people that can't afford a more expensive PC. This gives them Internet capabilities and word processing for $300. This will run AOL, and play MP3s. All of these things are easy to do on a Lindows machine. What more do they need? Heck... For $300, I wouldn't personally be too heartbroken about trying something new. If it doesn't work, then they can always put Windows on it later. But at the worst case, a select few will probably immediately like Linux. A guy I work with was wowed by the Suse demo disk that I popped into a machine at work. He *liked* the fact that it was a bit different.

      I am really sad that people think that Linux is an alternative that they should be intimidated by, because a lot of people like many the folks on Slashdot keep pretending that the rest of the world is too dumb to use it. They'll never pick it up as long as we have these myths.

    12. Re:Linux doesn't win. by pjrc · · Score: 2
      Open office may be more than enough, but it's certainly not remotely equal to MS Office. It does not have the polish, and it does not have the usability.

      And these things will matter to the consumer who intentionally chose the "cheap" machine with the "windows substitute" ??

  38. Odd... by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    www.lindows.com doesn't mention Wal-Mart at all... In fact, they only mention preview releases.

    If this were real, the people that make Lindows would have the news pasted all over their website.

    I'm driving to Walmart today to see if I can check one of these 'puters out.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:Odd... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      I'm driving to Walmart today to see if I can check one of these 'puters out.

      Don't bother. These are only sold via the website.

    2. Re:Odd... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a friend that works for Lindows and he sent me the link to this today before it was posted here.

      He said they've been going nuts to meet this deadline. Sounds like everything is moving pretty fast for them at the moment. Maybe the website hasn't "caught up."

  39. Windows Compatible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The ad says:
    This exciting new OS delivers the stability of UNIX
    with the ease of Windows and the ability to run most
    Microsoft programs
    .
    (Emphasis in bold not added) When you say this to the general public (which is pretty much the Wal-Mart crowd), you're saying that most programs will work exactly as they do under Windows, and not just run for a few *seconds* and crashing most of the time (like many do under Wine). Is theirs a reasonable claim? If not, it could make Linux look bad in general.
    1. Re:Windows Compatible by BigBir3d · · Score: 2

      "These computers do not ship with Microsoft Windows. They ship with an exciting new UNIX based Operating System (OS) named Lindows. This exciting new OS delivers the stability of UNIX with the ease of Windows and the ability to run most Microsoft programs. These computer systems are a perfect low cost alternative to computers preloaded with Microsoft Windows."

      Nowhere do I see the word Linux. How is the average uneducated (OS wise) Wal-Mart customer going to know that Lindows uses the Linux kernel? Will they even know/care what the kernel is?

      Personally, I think this is better news for KDE than anything else. AFAIK, there is no Gnome option.

    2. Re:Windows Compatible by Maran · · Score: 1

      "...you're saying that most programs will work exactly as they do under Windows, and not just run for a few *seconds* and crashing most of the time..."

      I'm sorry, the difference is?

      *Ducks the "-1, troll"s and flaimbait accusations*

      Maran

    3. Re:Windows Compatible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is, you are a fucking moron. My windows machine does 10x the work and has 1/10 the problems that our Linux machines (under the auspices of the various Linux gurus) have. You don't know the first thing about Windows useability, stability and performace. Just more parroting of biased, predjudicial manure. Welcome to slashdot!

    4. Re:Windows Compatible by FreeUser · · Score: 2

      Nowhere do I see the word Linux. How is the average uneducated (OS wise) Wal-Mart customer going to know that Lindows uses the Linux kernel? Will they even know/care what the kernel is?

      "Sauce for the goose, Mr. Savik."

      Wallmart Lindows users will care as much about GNU/Linux as many of the zealously anti-RMS Linux folks care about the Free Software Foundation's message of Freedom (as opposed to "simply getting it to work as cheaply and as well as possible.").

      The GNU/Linux community may get a small taste of what Stallman has undoubtably felt as he has seen his work taken, and no credit given (to the point where Linus Torvalds is actively discouraging any reference to the Free Software Foundation in any Linux kernel documentation, a rather spiteful act if there ever was one).

      A small taste, mind you, and I think you are right to point out that any damage if Lindows doesn't perform may not affect GNU/Linux directly as a result (i.e. the community could dodge a bullet on this one). On the other hand, if it becomes wildly popular, we may very well see a world in which everybody has heard of and uses Lindows, but few have heard of or are aware that they are using Linux, much less GNU/Linux.

      Sauce for the Goose, indeed, and an amusing bit of poetic irony if it indeed plays out that way. Personally, I think anything that brings freedom to the masses is a good thing (which is why, though I am deeply critical and fiarly annoyed at Linus' anti-FSF stance, I do not actively dislike the guy or in any way wish him ill, much less the OS I've come to know and love, by whatever name), and Wallmart's Lindows program might do just that, if they start offering such machines in their stores. Of course, Richard would undoubtably prefer it be called GNU/Lindows [evil grin], and it is with no little irony that he would be right in wishing so, as that might at least make people aware of GNU, of free software, and of software freedom in general (and thus, of the Linux kernel that underlies an important part of their Lindows systems) ... but just as open source provided a stepping stone for many a cynical suit (myself included ... yes, I was once a suit) to come to understand and ultimately embrace free software, so to might Wallmart and Lindows provide a similar stepping stone to many others.

      Here's wishing them success, whatever the branding and naming conventions they use.

      --
      The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    5. Re:Windows Compatible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As soon as they get home from WalMart they might just start Lindows and use it to DOWNLOAD a copy of Windows and Office.

    6. Re:Windows Compatible by dontkillme · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've been with Lindows for a little while now, that press release isn't accurate.
      They've stated to insiders that their goal is not to run most, or even alot of windows applications...but just to run certain apps that are "critical".
      I think that they're the ones who decide if it's "critical" or not.
      Most of the time their response to questions about specific apps is met with "have you tried xxxx linux program?"

    7. Re:Windows Compatible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It will most likely do exactly what it says.

      It says Microsoft programs. And thanks to WINE hacks like Crossover Office, and WineX, most programs written by Microsoft that people have heard of will work. E.g. Office.

      It doesn't say Windows programs, so they're not false advertising.

  40. OS X by !splut · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Looks like windows, kinda feels like windows, stable, UNIX based, runs most of the big important Windows programs...

    We're talking Mac's with OS X, right?

    --
    The angel in the oatmeal.
    1. Re:OS X by Nitar · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? OS X doesn't run Neverwinter Nights. (yet)

    2. Re:OS X by VoiceOfRaisin · · Score: 1

      youre darn right he should be modded as funny. lindows? stable? compared to what? windows 2.0 from 10 years ago?
      like it or not people, windows (curent version is xp) is VERY fucking stable. if you want to sit back with the ms bashing sheep and just keep repeating windows isnt stable then just fine. you are just kidding yourselves, and making yourselves look like idiots.

    3. Re:OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      We're talking Mac's with OS X, right?



      Not for $250, you're not.

    4. Re:OS X by pstreck · · Score: 1

      Stable? You call windows stable, why is it the average up time at my site on nt/2k servers is 2 weeks, and on the unix boxen its 8 months? Answer me this. Stable, anything is stable when you dont utilize it.

      --

      Later,
      Phil
    5. Re:OS X by MrResistor · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you find a place where you can get a Mac with OS X for $300, let me know, because I would love to have one to play with.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    6. Re:OS X by pmz · · Score: 4, Informative

      The difference: Wal-mart is selling their computers for $299 and up. $299! In this way, Wal-mart is not competing with Apple at all, since a person considering a really inexpensive PC will most likely not be considering a $3000 Apple workstation.

    7. Re:OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want to agree with this post, but... no, not Windows XP. I am sorry to bring the bad news to the both camps, but the most (stable+convinient) Desktop OS for i386 platform is Windows NT + service packs + latest fixes. XP just is not there yet. I hoped that Microsoft would bring the quality of Win2000 to the level of NT, but they decided to release XP instead. 2000 is a step back from NT in terms of stability, but XP is a total disaster. For the last three years I support a whole lot of Windows desktops in office environment running all the possible flavors of Windows released after 1995 and on average NT users have the least amount of problems with their PCs.

    8. Re:OS X by Arethan · · Score: 2

      This is very true. Windows has a horrible time staying up for long periods of time. At my previous employer, we had several Linux/x86 and Irix/SGI boxes with uptimes varying between 8 months to a year and a half. The only time these boxes were ever shutdown or rebooted was for kernel upgrades and hardware upgrades/replacements.

      On the otherhand, we also had several Windows boxes, and an MCSE on staff. We ended up scheduling automatic reboots every weekend in the mornings because the boxes would hang or crash if we didn't. The MCSE was no idiot either. There was literally no good reason why those boxes had to be rebooted all the time, they just did.

    9. Re:OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might want to read your parent post again. He said WINDOWS XP is pretty fucking stable. And it is.

    10. Re:OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      "...why is it the average up time at my site on nt/2k servers is 2 weeks, and on the unix boxen its 8 months?"


      Probably because you are a fucking clueless moron. If you learned how to properly administer Windows 2000 like you did Linux then you would see similar uptimes. I've run Windows 2000 IIS websevers which would have had uptimes of 2 plus years were it not for service patches and hotfixes. That's stable. You seem to confuse installing updates and hotfixes with stability.
    11. Re:OS X by MattHaffner · · Score: 1

      Sure it does. On somebody's box somewhere... You just can't go to the store and pick it up yet. Oh wait, that's the same for Windows too. :P

      How about waiting until the game actually shows up on the shelves before the crass comments, eh? And I can't wait to see how it shipped with the beta testers barely getting a chance to fiddle with it. Oh wait, that's normal today... *paying* to be a beta tester... sigh...

      I wouldn't be surprised if the first version that everyone is happy with doesn't show up until the Mac version ships in a few months anyway.

    12. Re:OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bwahahaha! CLASSIC troll! Blaming a system's inherent stability on the "administration capabilities of the user". That's a great one...

      Now, you can definitely blame a lot of security problems on the admin, but when it comes to the stability of said system, sorry, you can't. Most stability problems are traced back to device drivers or Windows not handling things the way it should. You could say that a good admin will know WHICH things the OS will fuck up, but that still doesn't make the admin to blame for these failures.

    13. Re:OS X by paradesign · · Score: 2

      as i recall, its the other way around, windows looks like a mac. remember who the inovaters are, and its not the smurf factory that made xp!

      --
      I want 2D games back.
    14. Re:OS X by PythonOrRuby · · Score: 1

      Well, they'e not $300, but a Kihei iMac that's perfectly capable of runnin OS X and just about any average consumer application imaginable, can still be had for $800. That's a far cry from $3,000.

    15. Re:OS X by lacrymology.com · · Score: 1

      You can find Beige Apple G3s on Ebay for right around $200.00 and drop and extra $100 for OSX. Sure it may be a bit slow, but you'd have OSX alright.

      --

      #
      # Modus Ponens
      #
    16. Re:OS X by nemesisj · · Score: 1

      Hahahaha. The "average" user that uses Windows XP is a home user, and most home users turn off their machines every night. Windows XP and Windows 2000 are not the same - Windows 2000 doesn't come close to XP's reliability and uptime. I haven't rebooted my XP system in over 3 months, which is ever since I installed XP. I'm a huge linux fan, but XP does most things right, and I have extremely few complaints, much less than I do with Linux.

    17. Re:OS X by mikethegeek · · Score: 2

      "Looks like windows, kinda feels like windows, stable, UNIX based, runs most of the big important Windows programs...

      We're talking Mac's with OS X, right?"

      And what a missed opportunity for Apple. If Apple sold an equivalent OSX based Mac for $500, they'd make inroads into the home PC market.

      But they don't. Because Apple, by and large, IMHO, has the same elitist viewpoint some in this thread are exhibiting.

      I wish they would sell something decent for even $800-1,000. I really would LIKE to have a G4 based Mac with OSX. But when I can build a far faster PC based on an Athlon for half that, where is the incentive?

      --
      === The price of freedom is eternal vigilance
    18. Re:OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well, they'e not $300, but a Kihei iMac ... can still be had for $800. That's a far cry from $3,000.

      And $800 is a far cry from $299 for the box and $100 for a decent monitor.

    19. Re:OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? Are you a redneck?

    20. Re:OS X by PythonOrRuby · · Score: 1

      Well, think of it this way...

      You get OS X itself, which would otherwise be $129. Granted, you get an OS with the Wal-mart machines, but that same OS, separately wouldn't cost nearly as much.

      Plus you get the ability to run things like Office, Photoshop, Dreamweaver, etc. natively. Even though these aren't included, and would cost extra(sometimes considerably more), the possibility of doing so is worth something to a lot of people.

      And you get a machine with a solid name behind it. The Wal-mart machines might just be no-name boxes that Wal-mart simply acts as a sales front-end for, but provides almost no guarantees itself.

      In the end, I think it's a good deal for those who really can't afford anything better. And I don't mean to belittle such people. There are lots of good reasons to be behind, and I know what it's like to be struggling. I just think that if you can afford something more, it ought to at least be considered.

    21. Re:OS X by thecombatwombat · · Score: 1

      That is Apple's goal with the eMac, however it starts at $1099, not quite that range. I don't think it's fair to say that Apple has high prices because of some elitist attitide, so much as it is more expensive for them to produce a complete G4 based system than for Dell or Wal-Mart to produce an x86 based system. (Note I am not a Mac elitist, I too have an amd system i built, for just that reason.)

    22. Re:OS X by aussersterne · · Score: 2

      Here's what I did a few months ago:

      PowerMac 7300: $155 used at local university surplus sale.

      17" PC Monitor, $25.00.

      PC Monitor adapter for macs: $10.00.

      OS X from eBay, $80.00.

      Couple of hacks off the net to get OS X to install on some PowerMac machines: free.

      OS X machine total cost: $270.

      It can be done. Be creative.

      --
      STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    23. Re:OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish they would sell something decent for even $800-1,000. I really would LIKE to have a G4 based Mac with OSX. But when I can build a far faster PC based on an Athlon for half that, where is the incentive?


      You can get a G4-based eMac (with CD-RW drive and 17" monitor and Ethernet and FireWire) for $1099. That includes AppleWorks, iTunes, iPhoto, and iMovie. If it's like the iMac G4, it also includes a Development Tools kit that you can use for compiling BSD/Linux/GNU software, or for playing around with NeXT-style object-oriented development.

      I have not seen ANY decent "far faster than a G4" Athlon based systems for $400 to $500 that include Ethernet, FireWire, a 17" monitor, and an equivalent bundle of software. Generally the $400 prices are for low-end Celeron or Duron PCs AFTER the application some gimmick ("'save' $300 now by agreeing to pay $600 to an ISP later").
  41. wow, this is big news by Karma+Star · · Score: 1

    linux, preinstalled on computers sold by a major retail chain. could this mark the entry of linux into the home consumer market?

    i think this is a milestone for linux...

    --
    Me email iz skyewalkerluke at microsoft's free email service.
    1. Re:wow, this is big news by Zelet · · Score: 1

      Could be... but Linux isn't a good home-pc OS. Never has been.

      Remember the right tool for the right job.

      --
      ...And when they came for me, there was no one left to speak out for me." - Martin Niemoeller (1892-1984)
    2. Re:wow, this is big news by Karma+Star · · Score: 1

      but Linux isn't a good home-pc OS. Never has been.

      neither was windows 3.1. but it ended up doing well, even over the far superior mac gui.

      the main thing here is that a major chain has begun selling off linux boxes. you can just go to a walmart and pick up a linux box. especially if its dirt cheap. many people who would otherwise avoid linux because of its complicated setup may reconsider a preloaded box.

      my only real concern is if they will provide adequate support for the preloaded linux boxes. that could make or break the success of selling linux boxes on the retail end.

      --
      Me email iz skyewalkerluke at microsoft's free email service.
    3. Re:wow, this is big news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An entry and a quick exit! :) Where's the software? You buy the machine, then walk down the isle and buy a game. Get home, install it, run it. BSoD (Black Screen of Death (Kernel panic for those of you too stupid to get it)). Find out that only 1 in 10 windows preogram run enough to even be useable. Oh well, $1200 down the drain. Last time they or any of their friends ever have anything to do with Linux again.

  42. Strange Move... by TheKubrix · · Score: 1

    Next walmart will start selling bare bone systems,....then eventually evolve into ,shudder, Fry's!

  43. Must be great to be a WINE developer.... by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    After spending months and years working for free to create a windows environment in Linux... some scumbags are using your donated time and energy to hoodwink ignorant customers into buying cheap pcs.

    It's kind of sad, really.

    --
    Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    1. Re:Must be great to be a WINE developer.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what's your ultimate goal then? Obscurity? Nice one. Maybe you can get a paying job with Lindows.

    2. Re:Must be great to be a WINE developer.... by amccall · · Score: 2

      To be fair to the Lindows people, they are donating much of their Wine code and efforts back into Wine. As Lindows continues to advance, so will Wine. There is a lot more to Lindows than simply the Wine DLL's and such.

      --
      ------ 24.5% slashdot pure
    3. Re:Must be great to be a WINE developer.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, just like those arseholes at RedHat, Debian, Suse, Mandrake, etc, who are using Linus Torvald's donated time and energy to hoodwink ignorant customers into using different OSs..

      It's just SOOOO sad..

    4. Re:Must be great to be a WINE developer.... by Justen · · Score: 1

      Lindows also has offered financial assistance to open source developers, in addition to contributing code back to Wine and the other open source programs those scumbags you're talking about are using.

      Link.

      jrbd

    5. Re:Must be great to be a WINE developer.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me clarify the parent post. Some of you are going to think it's an elitist post. I don't think so. I think what the parent is trying to say is that the PCs are misleadingly sold. Folks will go into Wal-Mart and think they're getting a Windows box, or mostly compatible Windows box... Then they'll try to install their favorite games and they won't work. They're getting scammed. I agree.

      I have no problem with a WINE-based PC being sold to the general public, but let's wait until it WORKS. I don't think LindowsOS is ready for prime time. This box will probably yield a lot of disappointed customers, and that makes me very sad.

  44. You know for all the whining you all do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    about the uptake of Linux to the desktop you wouldn't think there would be so much negativity about this. Walmart is a huge retailer who is willing to preinstall a version of Linux that is actually usable to most people and still you complain. I hope this gets modded up because this negativity is quite disturbing. What a great way to get application/game devs to port their stuff. Do you people know how many people actually shop at Walmart. And suffice to say they are not all rednecks.

  45. True price savings... by danamania · · Score: 2

    Not being from the US where this is all happening, the prices are just numbers that don't mean too much - compared to similar systems, do walmart look to be passing on the savings over providing windows?.

    Looks a good idea so far, on two fronts - giving people an alternative to windows, and letting anyone who's a little more cluey to run an alternative system without having wasted cash on an OS they're not going to use. Thats the theory, nice if the practice holds up with lower prices.

    a grrl & her server

    1. Re:True price savings... by tjw · · Score: 1

      Windows PC $498 USD
      Same PC with Lindows $399 USD
      Same PC with no OS $399 USD
      I would say they pass the savings on to customers. But then again, I don't really know Windows XP OEM pricing.

      --

      XJS*C4JDBQADN1.NSBN3*2IDNEN*GTUBE-STANDARD-ANTI-UB E-TEST-EMAIL*C.34X
  46. Impression? by Mr_Silver · · Score: 5, Informative
    Hopefully Lindows makes a good impression.

    Of course it will. They'll think it's fantastic, right up to the point when they try to install their favourite Windows applications and it all goes horribly wrong.

    Then they'll mutter "crock of shit" and take it back to Walmart to complain.

    Not that I blame them, Walmart is advertising it as having the ability to run most Microsoft software, which (unless it's changed drastically) isn't quite the case.

    I'm all for getting Linux to the masses, but if they oversell what it can do, then they'll end up putting off people rather than attracting them.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    1. Re:Impression? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      So how is this different from any other market out there? In every industry there are components that will not work as you want them to, or will only work in the exact way the mfg describes. But most of the time, you get these components at a MUCH LOWER PRICE, just like LindowsOS.

      When you buy a $200 car, I'm sure not everything is going to work properly, but you understand that, because it was cheap. Same goes for computers. "Hey, this one is only $299 while these others are $800!"

      The target audience for these systems is the average joe who wants to surf the 'Net, get email, write the odd letter on a word processor, and maybe play a game or two. LindowsOS is perfect for that and the user doesn't have to pay the Microsoft tax.

      The only problem I have with this is how it's marketed. They'd better be damn clear that it's NOT Windows and that not every Win32 program will run perfectly under it. From what I see, they do advertise this and I hope they continue to.

    2. Re:Impression? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not so sure. I know a lot of people that use only what comes with their computer. They use it to "get on the internet" and for word processing. I'm sure Lindows is quite good for that, oh, except for that little thingie about running everything as root.

    3. Re:Impression? by HiThere · · Score: 2

      The people most likely to be confused are the new users.

      These people will probably use the "free install software" that comes with their box. They'll ask for a word processor, and get Open Office instead of Word, etc. Lots of games on that list, but it doesn't include the ones in the stores, it includes TuxRacer, and things like that. But it's part of the fancy Software Warehouse (or some such) application, with all sorts of glitz wrapped around it.

      I expect that they won't start trying to install other stuff until they get bored with what comes with the system. So it will probably take more than a couple of months.

      Now I haven't tried Lindows. I've only looked at the pretty pictures. But it doesn't LOOK bad. Too bad they have it set up so that everyone runs as root. That's a bit hard to forgive, and WILL cause problems.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    4. Re:Impression? by NeuroManson · · Score: 2

      Well, technically it *can*... But the problem is, do you know of *any* software company that produces Windows software, who distributes instructions describing how to install their apps under WINE, etc?

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  47. Wait a minute by quantaman · · Score: 2

    From lindows.com
    *Note: Even though Insiders will also get the final version of LindowsOS when it's released later this year, the Insiders program is designed for those looking to get involved with our mission early on and take a look at the LindowsOS Sneak Previews as they are released and sharing their feedback with us. If you are only interested in looking at LindowsOS when it is finished and "useable", you should probably wait for the final release.

    Okay, so it's not finished but you can order a Wal-Mart PC with it pre-installed now?!? I'd hate to think that thousands of red necks are going to become beta testers for a new linux distro!! And if it is somehow actually shipping (web sight horribly out of date) where is the source?? I'm not entirely clear on how the GPL works on this "preview" version they've been tossing around but if it is being distributed pre-installed on PCs I'm pretty sure that they have to release the source.

    --
    I stole this Sig
    1. Re:Wait a minute by morgajel · · Score: 2

      who better to be a beta tester?

      I think you just inadvertently made a great point.

      these are *real people, redneck jokes aside. having a geek beta test something is a waste of time. they know what to expect. example: I've converted my girlfriend's computer to debian, and she's found plenty of problems with the default install I never would have.
      there's no easy way for her to access the CDrom or the floppy drive.
      she didn't know what "mount /floppy /dev/floppy" was, and she didn't care. we can't expect them to all jump to CLI and perl overnight.
      Letting walmart customers betatest might not be the smartest Idea profit wise, but they'll get a LOT of good customer feedback:)

      --
      Looking for Book Reviews? Check out Literary Escapism.
    2. Re:Wait a minute by WeedMonkey · · Score: 1
      I'm not entirely clear on how the GPL works on this "preview" version they've been tossing around but if it is being distributed pre-installed on PCs I'm pretty sure that they have to release the source.

      So what? If Linux starts accepting patches from Cletus Technologies inc., that's up to him.

      Oh yeah, btw...

      web sight

      FFS, it's site not sight. How hard can it be to spell it rite?

    3. Re:Wait a minute by Ozymandias_KoK · · Score: 1

      If we're being pedantic, it should be spell it correctly, not any variant on right. :)

    4. Re:Wait a minute by Decimal · · Score: 2

      who better to be a beta tester?

      these are *real people, redneck jokes aside. having a geek beta test something is a waste of time.
      [...] Letting walmart customers betatest might not be the smartest Idea profit wise, but they'll get a LOT of good customer feedback:)


      *Ring*

      Operator: "Lindows bug report center, please state the nature of the problem and what you were doing at the time the error occured."

      Southern voice: "Yeah, my cumm-poo-ter ain't werk'n. An' I wudn't able t' catch no mouse, so how does I hook up dis here racoon I scrapped off deh road?"

      Do you see the problem with relying upon the "normal" person to help hunt down the bugs? The typical person expects to buy a product that works flawlessly. So there's a real problem when Wal-Mart targets the common person to test a beta program. This could turn off everybody to Lindows even before it's ready to take off. Lindows might be a great product even if buggy, but they can't follow Microsoft's footsteps. Microsoft succeeded despite a buggy program due to it's establishment in the market. Lindows is starting from nothing using a buggy product to take on an already established, now stable product by Microsoft. Who also happens to be waging legal war against them. The Wal-Mart public beta doesn't help at all.

      --

      Remember "Bring 'em on"? *sigh
    5. Re:Wait a minute by morgajel · · Score: 2

      well, linix/*bsd/OS X are eventually going to start making large moves into the desktop market whether we all like it or not. we're going to have to deal with it.
      Better that an iffy company like lindows is the sacrificial lamb. If it works out, great, people will hear about linux and it will break out more than it has. if Lindows gets chomped into itty-bitty pieces, linux gets a bad name with the general populace... it's a risk that will eventually happen, I'd rather have lindows doing it than redhat, mandrake or debian...
      all else fails we can say, "nonono, you chose the wrong one" and show the the path towards what you consider enlightenment.
      (my apologies towards lindows fans.)

      --
      Looking for Book Reviews? Check out Literary Escapism.
    6. Re:Wait a minute by WeedMonkey · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it was just too tempting

  48. Here's a comment I posted Earlier ... by dunstan · · Score: 2


    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=31934&cid=34 42 511

    It is exciting to see this happening, but the acid test is whether they are still selling these machines in this config in three months' time. If they *are*, then we may have a major breakthrough on our hands.

    Dunstan

    --
    The last scintilla of doubt just rode out of town
    1. Re:Here's a comment I posted Earlier ... by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Well... I think people inherently don't want to install software. They want it all preloaded, and Linux can provide that, with no additional cost.

      I think it's mostly going to be kids (and a few adults) who can't run their latest games on Lindows that will be doing the whining. Everyone else might be happy.

      Or they might just get their geek friend to reformat it in two weeks and put a pirated version of XP on it.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  49. The afterlife by Odinson · · Score: 1
    Somewhere in dotcom heaven, Loki is smiling right now.

    1. Re:The afterlife by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad they went under so soon. I'm sure they could have made a bundle selling Linux/Lindows games alongside Lindows PCs.

    2. Re:The afterlife by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      I love your sig.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    3. Re:The afterlife by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...but what about pr0n? You can't have an internet without pr0n, and since people like pr0n, there should be a happiness bonus too. Also, the happiness bonus should apply to all civilizations except for those using the Fundamentalist government type.

      =)

  50. No Score +1 Bonus by Sean+Clifford · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    Welcome to high Karma. When your Karma gets above a certain level, your posts will automagically be given a score of 2 --- unless you check the box, then you won't get the bonus and will have it rated at the usual 1.

    Your Karma can't go above 50. Interestingly, it took a year to get to 25 and just one month more to get to 50. [Shrug]

    1. Re:No Score +1 Bonus by kisrael · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      And now someone's trying to beat you down 'cause it's Offtopic (it'll grow back)

      Anyway, once you start getting the +1 Bonus, you start getting more attention anyway, from people who read at +2, so it's much easier to make your second 25 than your first.

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    2. Re:No Score +1 Bonus by uigrad_2000 · · Score: 2
      And now someone's trying to beat you down 'cause it's Offtopic (it'll grow back)

      And, I suppose this message will be hit too. Oh well. Karma is cheap nowdays!

      I've always thought the decision to have "off-topic" count as negative was bad. Anyone who reads many newsgroups knows that the best threads usually start hidden inside another unrelated thread!

      It is my duty, then, to inform all who can read this, that you can change which mods are positives, and which are negatives. I finally decided to make "off-topic" a +1 for when I'm reading about 2 months ago. I've been extremely pleased with the selection of posts it brings up to the surface! Everyone should at least try it sometime.

      --
      Free unix account: freeshell.org
  51. Where I live by bsDaemon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In Gloucester, VA, they just built the largest Super Walmart and distribution centre in the world or some crap like that. So there are probably going to be a lot of bubbas to lazy to drive over to Newport News to go to CompUSA and will buy these things. I don't know why. J-Random Bubba Junior is going to be more hurt than helped by this. We complain about freedom or technical issues. They complain about not being able to play Solitare, read their email, and play the latest copy of some game. They don't need to be running UNIX to do those things. Chances are this will just present them with more options they don't understand. Windows is confusing enough for most people around here, why do they now need to be confused and only able to run "most" microsoft applications? Also, how does it help us to have a flood of people who arn't going to contribute anything back except bitch at us and demand help in chat rooms without saything "thank you" at the end as if we exist soley to be their god damned tech support line?

    1. Re:Where I live by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well put,

      Not to mention, look at who will be forced to sell this "exiting new operating system". I don't imagine Johny at the Wallmart electronics department knows anything at all about WINE (other than it give you a headache the next morning).

  52. SOme people need just a few Windos programs by rector · · Score: 1

    If one uses mostly Unix and runs just a few Windows programs because he likes them, he may find convenient to run all his staff on a single OS without need to reboot.

  53. Do not buy con Wal-Mart by gasull · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Wal-Mart is one of the worst companies ever. Do not buy anything there.

  54. Special Offer from Walmart???? by wilsonjo · · Score: 1

    At the end of each of the PC descriptions it says:
    Special Offer -- Select up to 3 free software applications from the Lindows.com Warehouse of software applications

    I personally do not like the wording of that. Isn't Lindows a software repository of packages, or are they charging after the first 3 downloads?

    1. Re:Special Offer from Walmart???? by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > are they charging after the first 3 downloads?

      As I understand it, they charge for some applications
      and not others. Or something like that. Anyway, if
      the installs go smoothly enough, many end users wouldn't
      mind paying a small amount for the convenience. Those
      that do mind can always go download freely available
      software from the original distributors and take the
      trouble to read installation instructions... as I
      understand it, most unixy things should install as
      smoothly on Lindows as on any other Linux-kernel-based
      unix distribution. Installing Windows-based software
      under WINE would be trickier, and if the Lindows install
      process is smooth it could be a real benefit.

      Of course, I haven't actually tested Lindows, so I
      have no idea how smooth its install process is in
      practice.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    2. Re:Special Offer from Walmart???? by CoolCash · · Score: 1

      I have installed Lindows on 2 different computers, virtual pc and an athalon based system. The install was eaiser than Windows,no prompts except for password and computer name. I have gotten M$ Office to install and run with IE 5.5. It's an interesting concept.

  55. Uugh by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

    Wal-Mart shoppers are already used to buying things like kola, chokolat, jeens, meet and asspren. I'm sure Lindows will fit right in with all the other misleading named products there. So I don't think this turn of events will do much to help the Lindows/Windows trademark suite.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    1. Re:Uugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, you forgot Malk! With vitamin R!

  56. you can bet by OklaKid · · Score: 0

    this will put M$FT's pantys in a bunch...

  57. re: Rednecks by mike77 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    legions of rednecks...

    Ya know, it really disturbs me that this kind of blatant stereotyping is going in a "enlightened group discussion" on /.. I myself shop at Wal-mart and have been on occasion referred to as a redneck. Yes, I'm from the south, yes, I consider myself a "good ole boy". But ya know what, I work on computers all day long, use only Linux/Unix systems and I'm damn good at it. why don't we just start insulting other groups of people in our posts, like say yankees, foreigners, black, hispanics.... no? Then lets try and avoid insulting a group of people who you think you're better than.

    --

    --Keeping the flame wars alive, one post at a time

  58. Not necessarily a good thing by Gedvondur · · Score: 2

    If I remember my ancient history properly, Commodore thought a good way to get to the masses was to sell product through K-Mart.

    All that got them was the same reputation that Kame-Apart's crappy TVs had.

    It made them a non-business option for whole legions of companies when they were still considered a viable option for businesses.

    Are you going to install Lindows based PCs in your Fortune 500 enterprise when Wal-Mart sells them? Probably not.

    Wally-Mart could very well be a kiss of death for Lindows as a viable OS for any kind of professional.

    When you stain your product with "low class" like that, it's very hard to remove.

    A risky choice, all around, IMHO.

    1. Re:Not necessarily a good thing by Roblimo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wal-Mart has been selling HP computers running Windows for a number of years now.

      I notice that plenty of Fortune 500 enterprises buy from HP and use Windows.

      But I live in a double-wide trailer and shopped at Wal-Mart a couple of days ago, so I'm sure this observation is not valid. :)

      - Robin

    2. Re:Not necessarily a good thing by Gedvondur · · Score: 2

      The Pavillion line of consumer grade boxes from HPQ is NOT the corporate workstations they sell. There is a clear division between the consumer line and the corporate line. (this is true of IBM in the past, Compaq, and Dell.)

      I see no such division with the Lindows OS and there was no such division at Commodore.

      As far as trailers go, I was taken home from the hospital when I was born it was to a trailer home. I occasionally shop at Wal-Mart. I don't like to because their stores are dirty and disorganized, not because of the caliber of shopper there with me.

      It's not intended as a slam on Wally-Mart shoppers.

      You do have to admit, however, that Wally Mart isn't what you would call "upscale" or "Corporate".

      That was the point, apologies if I offended.

    3. Re:Not necessarily a good thing by BrianWCarver · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The best news about this is that its pre-installed linux on a low-cost box. The installation process, no matter how easy, is a big hurdle for many novice computer users. They use whatever came on the machine for three to five years and then they buy a new computer and use whatever comes on that one, etc. Now, is Wal-Mart and Lindows perfect? No. Not at all, but if this is even slightly successful we may be able to get Best Buy and Circuit City and so on to start offering a pre-installed Red Hat/Mandrake/SuSE option and THEN comes the revolution baby... When you walk in and start looking at HP/Compaq computers in Best Buy and the first question the sales rep asks you is, "Are you interested in an HP with Windows or Linux on it?" then things will have drastically changed. I look forward to it.

      --
      Like Digital Freedoms? Then donate to EFF before they're gone.
    4. Re:Not necessarily a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And we all know how poorly Commodore 64's sold, right? What, only..30 something million of them? And anybody that used a C64 will attest to the fact that it was the best home computer for it's time. It didn't hit it big for business because it didn't offer what businesses needed! It had nothing to do with reputation.

      Commodore had no good spreadsheet programs (they had ones that were fine for home use, but weren't quite good enough for business), the system only had 64KB of ram as opposed to 640KB and it just wasn't expandable enough.

      LindowsOS isn't marketed at businesses either (well, not yet anyways). If they wanted to market it towards business, just slap a different name on it and tailor it slightly! End of problem.

    5. Re:Not necessarily a good thing by mikethegeek · · Score: 2

      "Are you going to install Lindows based PCs in your Fortune 500 enterprise when Wal-Mart sells them? Probably not."

      If your argument is valid, then the opposite is equally valid:

      Are you going to install Windows based PC's in your Fortune 500 enterprise when Wal-Mart sells them?

      The elitism in this thread is really bothering me. I love and belive in Linux. I want it to grow beyond being a server OS and a geek desktop OS, because more use and development benefits us ALL...

      --
      === The price of freedom is eternal vigilance
    6. Re:Not necessarily a good thing by Gedvondur · · Score: 2

      I am cautiously optomistic, but frankly I think the lesson that companies will learn is that good Level 1 tech support for Linux is hard to come by.

      Companies will have to double their support costs to support both Windows and Linux (regardless of distro flavor).

      Having worked in the deep past at a Best Buy, I can tell you that many of their customers are unprepared for Linux, in any form. They can't handle the Windows boxes they have.

      Plus, super-cheap systems ALWAYS come with some kind of messed up non-standard hardware. Remember Packard Bell's soundcard/modem combos? This kind of thing will put tremendos pressure on manufacturers in both customer support and driver creation/updates.

      Consumer grade PCs at a Best Buy are loss leaders to get you into the store and buy a printer and accessories to go with it.

      Margins on this kind of product are incredibly thin. As much as I would LIKE to be able to get Linux (pick your distro flavor) on a machine like that, I think that the economics of the situation will be a significant barrier to entry.

    7. Re:Not necessarily a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are not remembering correctly. Commodore did quite well with the likes of the Commodore 64, and to this day they sold more of this single model computer than ANY COMPANY ON THE PLANET.

      K-Mart is not the reason that kept Commodore out of business... it was because Commodore management was out of touch with what mattered to business.

    8. Re:Not necessarily a good thing by ocbwilg · · Score: 2

      If I remember my ancient history properly, Commodore thought a good way to get to the masses was to sell product through K-Mart.

      All that got them was the same reputation that Kame-Apart's crappy TVs had.

      It made them a non-business option for whole legions of companies when they were still considered a viable option for businesses.

      Are you going to install Lindows based PCs in your Fortune 500 enterprise when Wal-Mart sells them? Probably not.


      First off, I'd like to point out that Commodore computers were always targetted at the home market, not Fortune 500 businesses. It made good business sense to sell your home PCs where people shopped for things for their homes, ie, Kmart, Target, Sears, Service Merchandise, etc.

      Secondly, Commodore's home PCs didn't have nearly the sort of negative connotation that you seem to think they did. Were they the choice of big businesses? No. Were they one of the best options available for the home market? Yes. Were they consistently ahead of the curve as far as features and capabilities in a home PC? Yes.

      And finally, just because something is sold at Wal-Mart doesn't make it cheap. Wal-Mart sells quality brand-name products. I shop at WallyWorld somewhat regularly and I've never purchased anything from them but brand name products. Yes, there are Wal-Mart "generic" brands (like Sam's Choice and Equate and the like), but Kroger's and Giant Eagle and many other large retailers also have their house brands. Does that make a brand-name product purchased from them any less of a brand-name?

      Here's a little secret for you...I used to work for a food company that made several well-known national brands of pasta, sauces, soups, etc. One of the larger portions of their business was also making "generic" store-brand products for the large chain stores that sold our brand-name products. The same quality control and recipes were used, but the packaging had a different name on it. So what you think is an inferior store-brand product is often times no different that what you're paying an extra 98 cents for.

  59. UNIX-based? by unsinged+int · · Score: 1

    From the Walmart ad:

    These computers do not ship with Microsoft Windows. They ship with an exciting new UNIX based Operating System (OS) named Lindows. This exciting new OS delivers the stability of UNIX...

    Wouldn't it be more accurate to say Linux-based since from a user's viewpoint it looks like Windows but runs Windows and Linux programs? And technically didn't they build this off Linux and not BSD? I'm just wondering if Walmart made a simple mistake or if they're intentionally wanting to associate it with UNIX instead of Linux for some reason.

    1. Re:UNIX-based? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they're trying to take advantage of Apple's existing pro-UNIX campaign. Actually, replace "Lindows" with "Mac OS X" in that statement and it sounds very similar to one of Apple's ads. Coincidence?

      The more people spouting off about the advantages of UNIX-based OSes the better, I say. Anything to lessen Microsoft's stranglehold on the x86 OS market.

    2. Re:UNIX-based? by jonadab · · Score: 1

      Linux is just a kernel. These systems presumably ship with a
      more complete Unix environment: shells, standard unix utils,
      an X server, and so on. It's correct to call them Unix-based.

      It would also be correct to call them Linux-based, but that
      would be a different statement. Not that the target market
      will know the difference, but that's neither here nor there.

      Unix does not mean BSD, per se. (Yes, it's trademarked, but
      IIRC not by anyone in Berkely.) It's a general category,
      more specific than POSIX, but not so specific as to designate
      that a particular kernel is used.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  60. Shades of the past! by SampleMinded · · Score: 1

    Lindows and Wine being almost ready for primetime. Open-office being almost compatible with M$ Office. It all reminds me of the late 80's when IBM clones were almost 100% compatable. Its makes me very hopeful.

  61. Looks like they are trying to let the public know by Str8Dog · · Score: 2, Insightful

    These computers do not ship with Microsoft Windows. They ship with an exciting new UNIX based Operating System (OS) named Lindows. This exciting new OS delivers the stability of UNIX with the ease of Windows and the ability to run most Microsoft programs. These computer systems are a perfect low cost alternative to computers preloaded with Microsoft Windows.

    Taken from the site

    I like the low cost alternative line. Looks to to me like they are selling barebones boxes and including lindows to stop MS from starting some kind of legal war. Saying that Wal-Mart is encouraging warez.

    --


    Str8Dog
    using System.Darkside; public
  62. Lindows? Is that like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hmm... Lindows... sounds like Japanese marijuana:

    Glass!

    neh?

  63. But there is a alternative by rector · · Score: 1

    But there is an alternative. NT runs a lot of POSIX programs...

    1. Re:But there is a alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately NT sucks like an electrolux.

  64. Just Great... by Aknaton · · Score: 1

    I whole new bunch of people using Linux who can't even figure out to plug in their mouse. And why some of you feel the need to recreate Windows on Linux is beyond me.

  65. Great news, but... by jejones · · Score: 2

    ...I wonder how MS is going to retaliate? (Also, a few times I've pestered the local brick-and-mortar Wal-Mart about whether they sell computers without an OS--"Gee, walmart.com has them..."--and I'll probably ask them about these, too. Will Wal-Mart ever sell these in the brick-and-mortar stores?)

  66. Only if it runs most games by rector · · Score: 1

    Only if it runs advanced computer games designed for Windows.

  67. Linux for the masses by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 1

    think of the legions of rednecks...

    Can you get comet cursor for it? If not, I don't want it.

    And yahoo messenger.

    And some sort of automatic daily wallpaper update.

    --


    Evil is the money of root.
    1. Re:Linux for the masses by Dstrct0 · · Score: 1

      Yahoo has a Linux version of their IM available for download.

      There are automatic wallpaper updaters available, I've used them.

      Is Comet cursor a browser plugin? If so, then as long as you're not using Lynx as your default browser, there's a good chance you can get a Linux version of the plugin.

      Seeya at Wal-mart.

      --
      Build boards not bombs
    2. Re:Linux for the masses by Capt.+DrunkenBum · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the other 2 but Yahoo Messenger is available for Linux.

      Yahoo Messenger for Linux and FreeBSD

      --

      Not everyone deserves a 320i

  68. Jeff Foxworthy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You know this is a good thing for Jeff Foxworthy... It'll add to his repertoire of "Redneck" jokes.

    You know you're a Redneck if... (fill in the blank here)"

  69. thank goodness they don't mention linux! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the gayest thing I've seen since seeing Michael Robertson live. no mention of Linux there, so that's good.

  70. link to walmart by pgh_raver_dave · · Score: 1
    --

    -

    Competition is the mother of evolution.
  71. This will NOT create a legion of new Linux users by Quarters · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As far as I can tell this new promotion is like the OS-less PC promotion. It is being offered online only. You can not go into a Wal*Mart store and buy and OS-less PC. I doubt you will be able to go into a Wal*Mart store and buy a Lindows PC.

    So, who has access to the Wal*Mart website? Those people who already have a computer. Who goes to Wal*Mart.com to buy a PC? Outside of those people that want an OS-less PC to install Linux on, probably not a large number of people.

    This isn't going to convert unsuspecting people to Linux users (a dangerous thing to wish for at any rate). It isn't going to spread Linux to the mass market. It isn't going to steal any appreciable market share away from Microsoft.

    It's noteworthy for the fact that a major retailer has thumbed their nose at Microsoft. But, that same major retailer is only thumbing their nose while behind a box in a locked room with the shades drawn so that the world can not really see that they are doing it.

    If other major computer resellers follow suit (which I doubt they will), then this will become interesting. Now, though, it's nothing more than YALPOS (Yet Another Linux Post On Slashdot)

  72. Walmart Rednecks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck all "Ya'll" that wish to believe that "all" shoppers at Walmart are "rednecks". Living in Houston, Tx. I take offense to this name calling. If you want to come on down here, I'll kick all your "GEEK" asses. Dead before dawn. Newspaperfish

    1. Re:Walmart Rednecks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you're black, you're nothing more than a big greasy ape brought over to do the dirty work for the crackers.

    2. Re:Walmart Rednecks by newspaperfish · · Score: 0

      Uuuuuuhhhhh, Pecker Wood here bonehead. There aren't anymore rednecks in america. They've been replaced by Californians. Bite me.

  73. Are rednecks the new niggers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems that we can make disparaging remarks about rednecks. They are a group of people we can all feel superior to, and snigger about in weak jokes. But woe betide anyone who does that about negroes/Jews/muslims. Is there a good reason for this duality?

  74. Who is supporting it? by Java+Pimp · · Score: 1
    This is really great and all but is it really ready? Granted, I've never run Lindows but, given my experience with Linux, I can't see an average Joe Walmart shopper getting along with it very well.

    I can't see a local Walmart associate being able to trouble shoot more serious Windows problems let alone Lindows. You know people are going to seek support in the electronics section of their local Walmart.

    *No offense to Walmart associates, I'm just implying that Walmart is not an experienced computer retailer like Dell, Compac, Gateway (or even Circuit City or other electronics retailers but...) and does not have the support staff.

    Am I off my rocker on this? Is Lindows really that good that it can replace Windows for the average user? If it is, why haven't I seen more about it posted here?

    --
    Ascalante: Your bride is over 3,000 years old.
    Kull: She told me she was 19!
  75. While this appears good, by vegetablespork · · Score: 1

    it will probably harm the image of Linux among the masses, it now being associated with perceived second-rate, "Wal-Mart" PCs.

    --

    Call (206) 338-5780 COLLECT for information about a genuine BA, BS, MA, MS, MBA, or Ph.D.

  76. Is it easy to call the Innernet? by ch-chuck · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If it was darn easy to plug into a phone, subscribe to an ISP and get browsing and email, it may have a chance, then the genuinely interested users can start up the learning curve and enjoy a crash & virus free existance.

    Personally, I've avoided helping out home users with all their GD windows problems for years, as I'm not about to waste my time working free tech support for multi-billionaires, but if I meet someone with one of these it'd be fun to talk shop with them.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    1. Re:Is it easy to call the Innernet? by Christianfreak · · Score: 2

      "users can start up the learning curve and enjoy a crash & virus free existance."

      I don't know. Lindows is using Wine and I thought Wine's point was to bring on the Outlook viruses to Linux as well :)

      In all seriousness though Lindows can run Outlook it might actally be possible for a virus that's fairly self contained to execute in that environment. At the very least it could probably get at an Outlook address book.

  77. Internet Appliance Functionality by Erasmus+Darwin · · Score: 2
    I have a feeling that the emulation capabilities will always be in the realm of "kinda sorta, if you fiddle with it maybe, but not really". Unlike a computer geek (who generally has a compelling reason to stay booted into Linux), I suspect most regular consumers who want to run Windows-based programs would be better off paying for Windows. They don't have an investment in the free-software clause (except for an appreciation for software that's free-as-in-beer), and the gains from Linux's stability would most likely be overshadowed by the problems introduced during emulation.

    But I do see a very important market for these machines as grown-up versions of Internet appliances. If all someone wants to do is surf the web, send email, and do word processing, they can get away with native Linux applications. At $299, that's not a bad deal for someone who just doesn't care about the functionality that's not as easily available under Lindows.

  78. MS Linux by rector · · Score: 1

    MS Linux could be a better idea!

  79. Cryptic APIs, backwards compatible... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you mean, like Linux?

  80. Legions of rednecks.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This snotty comment just goes to show how distant the average techno geek is from the people who are really sponsoring the computer industry,
    and thus, your paychecks.

    You should be grateful that anyone in mainstream retail is trying to sell Linux on anything these days.

    This marketing attempt will probably fail
    like all the other attempts to sell Linux.
    I bet dollars to donuts that anyone who buys one
    of these crappy workstations will be cursing Walmart, and within a week, will be hunting around for a copy of Windows to replace it.

    1. Re:Legions of rednecks.... by Monkey · · Score: 1

      And when they find that copy of Windows, what do you think the odds are that they went out and bought it? I would say 90% of these Walmart machines will end up with a pirated copy of some Windows variant.
      Walmart knows this, and hey, they don't really care - it's hurting Microsoft, not them. They still get to sell a shitload of hardware at low, low prices without paying OEM licensing to Microsoft.

  81. I don't think this is going to work by g4dget · · Score: 2
    Even if Lindows has done their homework technically and everything works smoothly (and that's a big if), I think Microsoft is not going to let this pass. If they perceive Lindows and similar systems as a threat, they are going to change the licensing agreements for MS Office, and they are going to add little tests here and there to make sure that they are running on genuine Microsoft Windows. It doesn't have to break the applications badly--just a few little inconveniences and problems (can't print in MS Office, can't find its plug-ins in IE) would be sufficient. And Lindows would get blamed.

    Let's just hope that Linux doesn't go down in flames alongside with Lindows.

  82. Serious Issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was surprised to see this post. If I commented on niggers buying computers at KFC, I am labelled a racist. However, it is just fun and games to label southern and rural whites as "rednecks." The terms are equally offensive, and I do not see what this label has to do with a marketing decision by Walmart.

    Yes, we all have fun. But I just cannot believe that this type of garbage has made its way to /.

    1. Re:Serious Issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not offended when you call me a redneck. The snobby superiority of the comment bothers me, but not because of the word redneck, but because this is what linux and Free Software and GNU and the computer revolution in general was SUPPOSED to do -- put powerful tools in the hands of everyday people.

  83. And the hardware manufacturers are... by mssymrvn · · Score: 1

    Magnetbox, Sorny, and Panaphonic.

    1. Re:And the hardware manufacturers are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget Claricon.

    2. Re:And the hardware manufacturers are... by mssymrvn · · Score: 1

      Boh! :)

  84. rednecks? you should be so fortunate by jeffn7 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    what kills me about the Linux crowd, please excuse the generalization, is that there is absolute belief in the superiority of the platform, and absolute obsession with the lack of respect it gets in the mainstream.

    But what makes this observation interesting is that their is also an undercurrent of clubiness (sic?) about the whole thing. The idea that the masses could actually start using Linux is troubling to this group, as it would dilute the cachet of the club. This is bizarre to say the least, as mainstream adoption of Linux would only serve to achieve the first point, respect, and of course the other obsession, deflation of microsoft.

    I don't take particular offense to the redneck comments, but you would really have to be an idiot to think that only rednecks shop at Walmart. I mean, christ, they have over $200b in sales. I guess the only thing that would make you a bigger idiot is to not understand how many personal computers are sold in the US annually, and how many of them go through channels like walmart.

    1. Re:rednecks? you should be so fortunate by Bandman · · Score: 2

      I know why I would fret at the rest of the world using Linux...I'm in tech support. Fixing something on a linux computer that is on the net is fine...fixing someone's chat script remotely over the phone is a nightmare, which i've actually lived. Linux is great for me, for most of the computer ppl that I know, and for servers (along with a healthy mix of BSD) but it stops at my little brother. He's pretty good, and he gets by with linux, but i wouldn't want to support anyone less comfortable on a computer than him...

    2. Re:rednecks? you should be so fortunate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Those ignorant rednecks deserve to be running Windows98. Because only l337 d00dz can run linux.

      I don't think a lot of you understand the average computer user. Once they buy a computer, they're locked into the OS that was installed on it, because they literally are unable to reinstall a OS on their own.

      So even if this flavor of linux isn't great, or barely usable, or requires apprenticeship to configure, it's irrelevant. They're stuck with it, and they'll limp along as best they can with what they've been given. At 640x480x16 with the default VGA X driver if need be.

      But I think you'll find that if they can't play the latest games on their computer, even if they can't reinstall by themselves, they'll find someone who will. And they'll pirate or buy a copy of Windows that the game was written to run under, and continue on their merry way.

      Because the OS doesn't matter. It's what you can run on it that does.

    3. Re:rednecks? you should be so fortunate by reallocate · · Score: 1
      Once they buy a computer, they're locked into the OS that was installed on it, because they literally are unable to reinstall a OS on their own.

      Probably true. But, is that important? I suspect most people don't want to know how to swap their OS, assuming they know the OS is there to begin with. Most people who buy cars are literally unable to swap out the transmission, and they don't care. They just want the thing to work.


      Which means this: Because the OS doesn't matter. It's what you can run on it that does.
      is very, very true.

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    4. Re:rednecks? you should be so fortunate by petrus4 · · Score: 0
      >masses could actually start using Linux is >troubling to this group, as it would dilute the >cachet of the club. This is bizarre to say the >least, as mainstream adoption of Linux would >only serve to achieve the first point, respect, >and of course the other obsession, deflation of >microsoft.


      Won't happen, precisely because of the aforementioned group. The Linux community itself and their attitude are probably the main reason why I myself no longer use the operating system.

    5. Re:rednecks? you should be so fortunate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But what makes this observation interesting is that their is also an undercurrent of clubiness (sic?) about the whole thing. The idea that the masses could actually start using Linux is troubling to this group, as it would dilute the cachet of the club.
      What I find interesting is that you can use a phrase like "dilute the cachet" with authority, but can't guess that "clubbiness" has two Bs.
  85. Good news, but there's a lot that can go wrong. by tobi_pinkjuice.com · · Score: 1

    Awesome. The dawning of a new era.
    Now Desktop Linux has to improve further (I'd say it's around 30% to 60% of the way to be usable as general purpose consumer OS; installation is just a minor aspect), more software makers should offer Linux versions, and more computer retailers should join, with choices of better distros.
    And distro makers should not sell the illusion of selling Windows clones; it's far more frustrating for the user to use Linux as Windows, than to use it as Unix, thus learning and adapting to the new concepts. I think Desktop Linux should try to be itself, not disguise itself as cheap Windows or Mac OS X clone. In fact, this strategy, which is intensifying these months, could kill Desktop Linux. If people want Windows, they can use it, if they want Mac OS X, they can use that; why use Linux then?
    Linux should advertise it's unique strengths, and concentrate on fixing it's unique weaknesses as a young desktop OS.

    --
    peace, love, respect
  86. everyones doing it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Selling bare bones computers with various linux distro's isn't new to my area. Many stores advertise their inexpensive systems in the paper with a small disclaimer (this system ships with linux not windows xp). I imagine Walmart will follow suit with these companies and try and sell most of it's customers the upgraded version with windows installed. However for those who don't take the upgrade I have to say I am a little nervous of having thousands of people associate all *nix systems with one that is fresh out of beta.

  87. Rednecks? by newerbob · · Score: 1
    To think of the legions of rednecks who could now possibly be running Lindows instead of Windows..."

    Hey! *I* shop at Wal*Mart and I'm a Silicon Valley multi-millionaire (with no dirty dotcom dollars)!

    I'm no red-neck, I just don't like to get ripped off paying too much.

    --

    --
    Ask the Ya-Hoot Oracle Anything!
  88. Walmart Rednecks by newspaperfish · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Oh, and before I forget. I choose dueling. Pistols at dawn assholes. You're fucking stupid, because YOU ARE CRACKERS/PECKERWOODS/WHITEYS/ANDHONKIES TOO. If you're white, then this is what you are to the most blacks out there stupid ass.

  89. Trademark laws...? by ThrasherTT · · Score: 1

    IANAL, but I thought there was a law saying that a company can't use a "trademark - 1" (meaning changing one letter or adding/removing one letter) name for a product. Anyone have any insight into this?

    --

    All Your Memory Are Belong To Java
    1. Re:Trademark laws...? by jjohnson · · Score: 1

      Microsoft sued Lindows for trademark infringement and lost; the judge ruled that "windows" is a generic term.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
  90. Speaking of Rednecks... by CleverNickName · · Score: 5, Funny

    The only way Lindows is going to catch on with the 'necks is if you can run one of the Big Game Hunter or Super Bass Fishing games on it.

    Mark my words.

    Go on, mark 'em! I dare you!

    1. Re:Speaking of Rednecks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or that new popular game down south "Sex With Your Sister".

    2. Re:Speaking of Rednecks... by unicron · · Score: 1

      I'm waiting for "Ned Beatty's eXtreme down river rowing".

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    3. Re:Speaking of Rednecks... by phriedom · · Score: 1

      Naw, real rednecks go out to the backyard to shoot stuff instead of using their computer. They use their computer for trading stocks and playing fantasy sports.

      --
      Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
    4. Re:Speaking of Rednecks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      the irony of mateing the sentiment of your post with the sentiment of your .sig is almost overwhelming.

    5. Re:Speaking of Rednecks... by vegetablespork · · Score: 1

      It's just Metallica. He doesn't know what it means.

      --

      Call (206) 338-5780 COLLECT for information about a genuine BA, BS, MA, MS, MBA, or Ph.D.

    6. Re:Speaking of Rednecks... by colmore · · Score: 2

      he's making fun of rednecks while sporting a Metallica .sig? it's worse than i'd imagined!

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    7. Re:Speaking of Rednecks... by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Naw... gotta have Redneck Rampage on it. :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    8. Re:Speaking of Rednecks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Analysis of a typical Wesley Crusher response on Slashdot:

      Part A: Make a statement that points out the blatently obvious.
      Part B: Say something cliche.
      Part C: Make fun of the cliche.

      Use this strategy, fellow slashdotters, and your post shall hit the glorious 5 time after time! Unless, of course, you happen to not be Wil Wheaton, because you get automatic +3 moderation for that.... so you'll havce 3 you'll need to make up by actually being funny.

    9. Re:Speaking of Rednecks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check it! wilwheatonnude.com: nude pictures taken of Wil by his aunt when he was 3 years old in a swimming pool. Plus, non-nude photos of Wil as an acting-ensign on Star Trek: The Next Generation, and candid shots of Wil at recent sci-fi conventions (special bonus E3 footage!)

    10. Re:Speaking of Rednecks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Incidentally, I was watching a TNG rerun tonight, and found myself thinking that Wil looks quite hot in his skin tight unitard.

      I'm expecting the embolism any time now.

  91. Re: Rednecks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can I still make fun of Republicans?

  92. Yikes, Linux as a commodity... by warpSpeed · · Score: 2

    Well, I guess I have to pick another line of work now. Before you know it every one (red necks included) will be getting thier linux at WalMart and I will be out of a job.

    I can hear it now, "Honey I'm starting an I-S-P right here in our Livin' room. Jest as soon as I can figure out how to edit all these miss files". (thats MS. for the humor impared)

  93. rednecks by ironfroggy · · Score: 1

    Yes, its prejudice. However, the term can mean more than one thing. In this use, I think it means more of a "people who dont know much about this sorta thing" than the typical redneck remark. Doesn't make it right, of course. But, not as bad as everyone is making it out to be. Besides, they couldn't pass this up because of one little remark, it is something I'm sure we all want to know. Most of us, at least. It's cool. maybe I'll try Lindows out myself.

    1. Re: Rednecks by ashkendo · · Score: 0

      The slashdot community is full of people that feel superior than others because they understand a small little niche of knowledge that the mojority of the population doesn't. They see themselves as too intelligent for racial stereotyping, but will easily fall prey to assuming people without their knowledge in computers and linux are far infrerior to themselves. If you ever feel the need to make this assumption think about how this person may know more about something else than you. Try to supress your ego, and you'll see that person is not stupid.

      --
      "Don't hate me because I'm right...Hate me because I'm an MCSE."
    2. Re: Rednecks by ebh · · Score: 1

      First point: I've lived all over the country, and the South has no monopoly on rednecks.

      Second point: Being a redneck is a matter of choice. Being poor, rural, white and undereducated does not make you a redneck, because none of that forces you to be an unshowered shirtless trailer-dwelling knuckle-dragging moonshine-swilling tobacco-spitting roadkill-cooking cousin-loving bigot.

      ObTopic: Nor does buying a $300 PC at Wal-Mart.

    3. Re: Rednecks by mike77 · · Score: 1
      OK, I'm a little pissed now. I get modded off topic for making a point about the blatant sterotyping in a post? so I guess if I started bashing all different kinds of groups in any posts I make, I'll get modded +5 interesting eh?

      --

      --Keeping the flame wars alive, one post at a time

  94. obSimpsons by superid · · Score: 3

    Sorny?
    Panaphonix?
    Magnetbox?

  95. If I ran a Fortune 500 shop... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I ran a Fortune 500 shop I'd have OpenBSD running on all the servers, either Slackware or FreeBSD on the techies' workstations, and SuSE on the muggles' computers. If the PHPs insisted on Windows; I'd let them have it, and delegate Windows support onto the most imcompetent MCSE I can find.

    I wouldn't fuck around with Lindows; the fact that its CEO used to run MP3.com is enough of a turn-off.

    1. Re:If I ran a Fortune 500 shop... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy christ, you'd be fired within a week!

    2. Re:If I ran a Fortune 500 shop... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could you do a better job of getting yourself fired? Jeez you /.ers are a bunch of ignorant fucks.

  96. I know Lindows = Linux + Windows by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 2

    But I think this is really not a good name. Lindows may be a combination of names, but it sounds like a knockoff of Windows. If you saw brand of foam toys called "Norf", would you think it was trying to succeed on its own or that it was a knockoff of Nerf?

    Likewise, this name on the shelves makes Lindows, and in turn Linux, sound like a knockoff of Windows, because it is directly comparing itself to Windows. Some people already have trouble grasping that the Mac OS and Linux (if they've heard of it) aren't kinds of Windows.

    I wonder if this product being on the shelves in Wal-Mart (among lots of non-techies) will do good or harm. Hopefully it won't damage the Linux name.

    mark

    --

    If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
  97. Only available on Walmart.com? by Capt_Troy · · Score: 2

    This is pretty ironic. You have to already have a computer to buy one? Most people who would buy a low end system like these probably don't already own a computer (besides the geeks here) and are looking for a cheap way to get one.

    On a side note, I think Lindows will fail and make Linux look like crap to the general public.

  98. why all the ???'s by squarefish · · Score: 1

    When you click for more info on the systems some of the details listed are: Microsoft? PowerPoint? Viewer, Microsoft? Word? Viewer, Microsoft? Excel? Maybe the webpage folk should have spoken to the hardware folk a little more before making this public.

    --
    Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.
  99. Bass fish'n by JLT+MeL · · Score: 0, Troll

    JoeBob is gonna knock ma's car of its blocks when Bass Fish'n wont load...

  100. On the other hand. by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wonder how many customers will try the "Click and run" apps (Many popular opensource packages there) and decide that they are extremely happy with them, minimizing the need to install Winblows software.

    Gamecompatibility scares me, though.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:On the other hand. by evilmonkey_666 · · Score: 1
      I wonder how many customers will try the "Click and run" apps (Many popular opensource packages there) and decide that they are extremely happy with them, minimizing the need to install Winblows software.

      But doesn't that defeat the point of using Lindows in the first place? I definitely think they should wait until it works and is stable before releasing it to the masses.

      --


      - PS. This is what part of the alphabet would look like if Q and R where eliminated.
    2. Re:On the other hand. by G00F · · Score: 2

      Maybe they are further along than they let us believe? I was one to think lindows would be vaporware/betaware for years. But if they are really going to be releasing this to what many people would call the none to bright masses, they must have some ace up their sleave.

      --
      The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions that I wish it to be always kept alive
    3. Re:On the other hand. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "But if they are really going to be releasing this to what many people would call the none to bright masses, they must have some ace up their sleave."

      Wallmart's world renowned reputation for technical savvy?

    4. Re:On the other hand. by pjrc · · Score: 1
      they should wait until it works and is stable before releasing it to the masses.

      That's never stood in the way of the world's most successful software company: Microsoft.

      You can always distribute a "service pack" 4-6 months later

    5. Re:On the other hand. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WHO THE FUCK would play games on a $300 machine? Think BEFORE you post, you dumb fuck.

    6. Re:On the other hand. by archen · · Score: 1

      you'd be surprised.

  101. Walmart == REDNECKS!!! by Nexus+Maelstrom · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Dammit, I live not 30 minutes from Walmart corporate headquarters. And let me say something. If you're shopping at Walmart, your either a hick, a redneck, or just cheap. While there are many "normal" people who shop at Walmart, the "Bubba" stereotype is not misapplied.

    Walmart was made be a REDNECK for REDNECKS! The company is still owned by REDNECKS!!! And something else? I go to a University full or REDNECKS that Walmart loves to give money to.

    So THERE!!!

  102. Ah, but do they get a free upgrade? by MImeKillEr · · Score: 1

    Lindows is currently beta. When it goes GA, will the WalMart customers get a free upgrade? Anyone know anything about the licensing regarding this?

    I'm all for going to Lindows, especially if it'll run *all* the Windows apps I currently use. If they're not getting 100% compatibility, they're going to lose customers.

    --
    Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
  103. Wal-Mart makes Windows a commodity product by WEFUNK · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For Wal-Mart to be using their power and credibility to position Lindows like this - as a direct alternative to a "commoditized" Windows OS - should be making MS shake in their boots. This is really big. I hope that this is more than just an experiment but a whole-hearted effort to introduce and market these systems to the average shopper.

    Previously, Linux and other alternatives have been positioned as being too disimilar to Windows for the average consumer to take notice. While early adopters and niche users may see the differences as the key selling points, the average consumer is looking for compatibility and familiarity FIRST, then other advantages SECOND (price, stability, and misc. features).

    Wal-Mart's actions not only position alternative operating systems in a different light, they also serve to re-position Windows itself by making the Windows Operating System appear to be a commodity like the PC has long been. When advertising the compatibility of Lindows, their enormous market power allow them to be more liberal with their use of the Microsoft and Windows brandnames than your average software developer or computer retailer could ever chance.

    This is may be very analogous to what happened to the IBM PC vs. the clones as well as the situation with generic drugs. Many continue to buy the "genuine" branded article, but others will take personal pride in buying the "same" product for less - and maybe even with some different or better features thrown in for free.

    This might be a first step in fragmenting the market around a common Windows compatible "standard" offered by multiple vendors at competitive prices. Also, it could result in opening more people's eyes to the advantages of using non-Windows based systems to meet their individual needs. I imagine that the reality will be somewhere in the middle, and that this will be a good thing for both consumers and business.

    --
    My next sig will be ready soon, but friends can beat the rush!
    1. Re:Wal-Mart makes Windows a commodity product by malfunct · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yeah but what made the clones viable in the market is that they ran exactly the same OS and exactly the same software in exactly the same way as the IBM PC.

      Lindows is enough different from Windows that I think the people that I see buying computers at walmart will end up confused and displeased when thier favorite games won't play. (does lindows support all the fancy DirectX graphics stuff yet?)

      Still I'm interested enough at this point to download the iso and check out the distribution.

      --

      "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

    2. Re:Wal-Mart makes Windows a commodity product by pmz · · Score: 2

      When advertising the compatibility of Lindows, their enormous market power allow them to be more liberal with their use of the Microsoft and Windows brandnames than your average software developer or computer retailer could ever chance.

      Although Wal-Mart's enormous size does worry me, they can use their status as The World's Biggest Corporation to successfully displace Windows. Often, for every bully (i.e., Microsoft), there is always an even bigger and nastier bully (i.e., Wal-Mart).

    3. Re:Wal-Mart makes Windows a commodity product by bluGill · · Score: 2

      No, genuine IBM machines ran PC-DOS, while everyone else ran MS-DOS. They were slightly different. In theory only in a few strings. (I seem to recall that PC-DOS didn't run on generic machine though) However PC-DOS and MS-DOS has idenitical functionality from a user's point of view.

      Lindows runs most Windows software. I remember when clones claimed 99% compatability, because of the few apps that didn't run. However there soon were enough clones out there that programs that didn't run on a 99% compatable clone were ignored by the marketplace. Hopefully Lindows can achive the same thing - programs that depend on something Lindows/wine doesn't impliment lose in the marketplace.

  104. "legions of rednecks" by jeffehobbs · · Score: 5, Insightful


    To think of the legions of rednecks who could now possibly be running Lindows instead of Windows

    Could you be more condescending?

    ~jeff

    1. Re:"legions of rednecks" by Bandman · · Score: 2

      he could have done it in a southern accent...

      *duck*

    2. Re:"legions of rednecks" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You *must* be white trash, to actually care when somebody insults a redneck....

    3. Re:"legions of rednecks" by wedg · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      To think of the legions of rednecks who could now possibly be running Lindows instead of Windows

      Could you be more condescending?


      How about this?

      To think of the legions of rednecks who could now possibly be running Lindows instead of Windows. Oh wait. What am I saying? Rednecks don't know how to use computers, much less actually buying them. They might buy them if you convinced them that buying a computer would be more fun than driving their pickup truck. But even then it'd probably end up as a door stop after some redneck gets the BSOD and shoots the monitor out with his shotgun.

      Better?

      --
      Jake
      Dating: while( 1 ){ call_girl(); get_rejected(); drink_40(); } return 0;
    4. Re:"legions of rednecks" by wedg · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Replying to my own post. Yeah. I know there's no BSOD in Lindows (probably? they might include it for full compatability), but the same could be said for the first kernel panic or ext2 fsck problem. The point is, computer + redneck = doorstop (or mini beer table, or foot rest, etc).

      --
      Jake
      Dating: while( 1 ){ call_girl(); get_rejected(); drink_40(); } return 0;
    5. Re:"legions of rednecks" by Silas · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, hey, watch it with the redneck jokes. I've been pretty happy living on a small farm in rural Indiana for the past few years, but that doesn't mean I can't kick your ass when it comes to administering a FreeBSD cluster, desigining a network, writing Perl, or other mad skillz. And that's between feeding the sheep, planting the garlic, driving big trucks around, and whatever else it is you think we do. Just watch out - one day a "redneck"'s might just 0wN jo0. :)

    6. Re:"legions of rednecks" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      he could have done it in a southern accent...

      "Thaink of the laijyuns of rednaicks who could nahw be runnin' Lainduhs instaid of Wainduhs."

      Yippie-ki-yay, motherfucker.

    7. Re:"legions of rednecks" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Wow, behold the legions of sensitive rednecks...

    8. Re:"legions of rednecks" by lordsutch · · Score: 2

      No doubt the comment is the result of visiting (or not visiting) the absolute craphole of a Wal-Mart in Ypsilanti.

      OTOH, I'd put my Wal-Mart Supercenter up against your Meijer any day...

      --
      My Blog. Sela Ward can sell me long distanc
    9. Re:"legions of rednecks" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow - several replies to this, and no comments on the Chandler-esque emphasis on the 'be'. I guess no one here watches 'Friends'.

  105. "Legions of Rednecks"? by n6mod · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wrong distro.

    Everyone knows it's RedHat that has the Redneck language option. (Even if it's just for the installer.)

    -Z

    --
    You have violated Robot's Rules of Order and will be asked to leave the future immediately.
  106. Why? by oseng · · Score: 1

    Same question I ask whenever someone brings up Lindows: Why go half-way with Lindows when you can go all the way with Linux?

  107. What does it matter by Pi+Kapp+142 · · Score: 0

    Dude, it does not matter if Lindows if really ready or not, Walmart says it is how one uses a computer. Walmart is a 800 ton gorilla. This is a huge day for linux. So many people will be exposd to this. So many kids who otherwise would not be exposed to a truly powerful, Unix-like OS are now going to get it for $600. This is so awesome.

  108. Familiar..... by greymond · · Score: 1

    Lindows......I remember several years ago - oh what was it called.....O thats right

    OS2 WARP V4
    - it ran "most" windows programs too

    but who knows maybe lindows will back there product longer than big blue did theirs

    1. Re:Familiar..... by vegetablespork · · Score: 2, Funny

      It might have a better chance without IBM's OS/2 marketing team behind it.

      --

      Call (206) 338-5780 COLLECT for information about a genuine BA, BS, MA, MS, MBA, or Ph.D.

    2. Re:Familiar..... by greymond · · Score: 1

      oh come on - don't you want to see "lindows" SPRAY PAINTED all over your city
      :)

  109. Hmmmm, seems it can be done ;-) by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

    I suggested this last time the subject came up and was told they couldn't/wouldn't do it because of the support issue. Looks like it can be done after all. At least now it will be much more likely that the hardware in the box really does support Linux. Lindows is an interesting twist I hadn't expected.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  110. Why I think wal-mart is great! by phunhippy · · Score: 2


    I agree with a previous poster who is upset for dissing on wal-mart.. Wal-Mart is a wonderful store.

    I mean they offer dirt cheap prices!

    The most important part thoe is when you walk into a wal-mart you are greeted by a 90 year old guy on oxygen and with a walker that says "welcome to walmart can i help you?" in some crazy i'm about to die voice and of course your like no no no its ok thanks anway and quickly walk away so you won't get whatever he has :)

    Now you tell me, who else is gonna give that man a job? NO ONE thats right.. not small local businesses either.. go wal-mart! helping the people who can't walk or breathe one store at a time!!

    1. Re:Why I think wal-mart is great! by Mr.Sharpy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wal-Mart is an evil corporation. Those dirt cheap prices you pay have a price elsewhere. There is an excellent story about Wal-mart on Alternet.
      How Wal-Mart is Remaking our World

  111. This is worse how? by lsommerer · · Score: 3, Funny
    I can just imagine millions of these things selling widely. Then every single one being hacked by one group with the same root exploit. Think of the headlines "Wal- Mart facilitates domestic terrorism" "Internet Weakened by Linux manchines" etc.[...]
    Now just imagine the PR nightmare for Microsoft if they sold millions of machines that were routinely vulnerable to exploits. Oh, nevermind.
    1. Re:This is worse how? by gimpboy · · Score: 2

      this is worse because microsoft has what most would consider to be a significant pr machine that can deflect negative issues such as these. linux lacks this type of representation in the media. as a result the negative attention will have a much greater impact on linux than windows reguardless of how much each should be getting.

      --
      -- john
    2. Re:This is worse how? by lsommerer · · Score: 1

      You're right, I was just going for the joke...

      But apart from that, has anyone actually seen Microsoft deflecting/spinning the exploits that Windows allows? I don't think they have to do that. I don't see the press asking hard questions. You read "bad hackers" stories, but you don't read "bad microsoft" stories --present company excepted.

      Maybe I'm just not listening right, or maybe Microsoft's PR department is that good, but I see software company accountability as a non-issue in the main stream. It would be interesting if these Lindows machines were not secure. If Microsoft made a point of it, then the press might pickup on a comparison between operating systems, or at least treat it as an issue.

      Anything to get rid of the "we wrote it, but we're not responcible for it" attitude that companies get away with now.

    3. Re:This is worse how? by gimpboy · · Score: 1

      you're right also. you'll hear bad hacker stories when referring to people breaking into microsoft computers. if the tide turns i predict you will hear linux is insecure stories. it's the price we pay for having a corporate controlled media. i've been reading a book about this very topic:

      Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media


      while i dont agree with all of chomskey's opionions, i do find little to disagree with so far in this book.

      the book actually talks about think tanks funded by corporations used to lend credence to corporate opionions. a good example of this can be found in the recent paper released by the Alexis de Tocqueville Institution.

      the paper seems to have disappeared, but i seem to have a copy here:

      http://sage.che.pitt.edu/~harrold/tmp/old_opensour ce_whitepaper.pdf

      --
      -- john
  112. I agree by Alec_Baldwin · · Score: 0

    If this gets modded any higher, I'm going to leave the country.

    1. Re:I agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this gets modded any higher, I'm going to leave the country.

      thank God! and me with mod points! oh happy day

      now, you gotta promise...

  113. Users aren't allowed to run Internet Explorer by El+Prebso · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think the EULA for Internet Explorer stats that you need a valid Windows licens.

    Sure you can run it without but that would violate the EULA, and that is actually illegal.
    Just because you don't like Microsoft, it doesn't make it okay to break the law.
    So who is going to make sure that Lindows users don't install IE ?

    From the IE EULA

    1. GRANT OF LICENSE. The SOFTWARE PRODUCT is licensed as follows:

    * Installation and Use. Microsoft grants you the right to install and use copies of the SOFTWARE PRODUCT on your computers running validly licensed copies of the operating system for which the SOFTWARE PRODUCT was designed [e.g., Windows(r) 95; Windows NT(r), Windows 3.x, Macintosh, etc.].


    (Okay this is from IE 4.0, but I don't think they changed it alot).

    Now I don't think that IE is designed for Lindows. Well perhaps no one will think of the idea of installing IE, let's hope so.

    --
    I didn't say it was your fault. I said I was going to blame it on you.
    1. Re:Users aren't allowed to run Internet Explorer by dmnic · · Score: 1

      if you have to have a valid Windows license to run IE, then what about Mac's?? you cant get a Microsoft Windows license for a Mac, but you can certainly install/use IE...hell, IE comes Pre-Installed.

    2. Re:Users aren't allowed to run Internet Explorer by vidarh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're assuming that the EULA is actually valid and that the clauses contained with it are actually legal in the first place. Neither are by no means certain, and if they were enforced there would be a pretty good reason to go after Microsoft for violating the Sherman Act on yet another count.

    3. Re:Users aren't allowed to run Internet Explorer by PimpNasty · · Score: 0

      Then what about the IE builds for Solaris and HP-UX

      --
      - Pimp

      I like computers, women and computers... in that order...
    4. Re:Users aren't allowed to run Internet Explorer by El+Prebso · · Score: 1

      Try reading this part again:
      1. GRANT OF LICENSE. The SOFTWARE PRODUCT is licensed as follows:

      * Installation and Use. Microsoft grants you the right to install and use copies of the SOFTWARE PRODUCT on your computers running validly licensed copies of the operating system for which the SOFTWARE PRODUCT was designed [e.g., Windows(r) 95; Windows NT(r), Windows 3.x, Macintosh, etc.].


      This means that to use IE on Lindows, Microsoft needs to design IE for Lindows (or change the EULA). You can legally use it on Windows, Mac, Solaris and HP-UX, because IE has been designed for it. This means that if you download IE of Solaris, you need a valid Solaris licens. Also it is not enough just to have the licens, your computer actually needs to run the OS. So even if you have a Windows licens, you are not allowed to run IE under Wine.

      --
      I didn't say it was your fault. I said I was going to blame it on you.
  114. Wal-Mart *IS* a technology focused company. by Tadghe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    alright damnit, enough is enough.

    > Walmart isn't really rooted in the technology industry

    utter bullshit.
    Guess who has the largest *private* database in the world. (and is the SOLE reason that NCR Teradata is still alive) Wal-Mart (with somewhere around 130TB in thier Topend system)
    Guess who has the largest single IMAP install in the world? Wal-Mart Guess who is (or was) Dell's Largest customer...Wal-Mart
    Guess who employees over 1400 in house (not contractors) programmers (in a single location (ok, you can split hairs with SMWDC/DMGTC being seperate)...Wal-Mart
    Guess which retail chain bet the bank on EDI before the next 6 largest guys even thought of it...Wal-Mart

    With over 2500 stores and a sub 2 second transaction time to *all of them* , how the heck did you think they were *NOT* a technology based company!?

    That crap about Wally world not being a technology company is baloney. Sam Walton bet the bank on computer technology when his rivals were still using paper invoices.
    I would note that the decision to sell Lindows prob has nothing to do with Wal-Mart as a company, but a lot to do with what it's Buyers and Marketing dept think will sell. (To those who have never worked in the corporate side of retail, Buyers are the guys/gals who buy the things the company then sells to it's customers, they typically work out the deals, many retail firms use independant buyers, but Wally world (and a few, very few) other companies do it all in house)).

    If someone really wants to know why they are selling Lindows, then ship off a message to president@wal-mart.com, The are quite good about responding, though I'm not sure what their answer will be.

    About the crack about rednecks buying Lindows...what do you think the average demographic of a Wally world online customer is? I'm willing to bet it's not ma and pa kettle in podunk Arkansas.

    --Tadghe, former WalMartian.

    --
    Bugs Bunny was right.
    1. Re:Wal-Mart *IS* a technology focused company. by mdw2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My friend, it's amazing how completely off target you are on your response. You addressed a statement that was never made. The post to which you responded never said that walmart didn't use a lot of technology, it said walmart was not a company who made all it's money selling PC's. You however decided to jump the gun and write a wonderful rant about walmarts internal IT structure, however that was nowhere near the discussion. The posters point was that walmart could afford to go out on a limb like this because they make a lot of money selling OTHER products.

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
    2. Re:Wal-Mart *IS* a technology focused company. by Jonny+Ringo · · Score: 1

      I think the poster you replied to was talking about the selling of technology to consumers, ie computers,servers, etc. but thanks for your lovely rant.

    3. Re:Wal-Mart *IS* a technology focused company. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when Sears was the only retail company that mattered it was the same story. You will find reminants to that effect if you know that Sears is an IBM shop big time; with token ring and the last to give up OS/2 this should be obvious. Sears had the latest IBM stuff and had lots of in house main frame programmers. Part of Sears even broke off and became IBM. With big companies like these they often are test beds for the latest.I am sure there were times before sell offs and out sourcing that Sears had more inhouse IT expertise than most 25 years ago. I think Walmart is following that same model in the present as a very dominant company that can afford to use and hire the best.

    4. Re:Wal-Mart *IS* a technology focused company. by Tadghe · · Score: 2

      mayhap I did, but I took it as a comment on Wally world not being a technology focused company....If I was incorrect then my apologies, if not then my rant stands...

      --
      Bugs Bunny was right.
    5. Re:Wal-Mart *IS* a technology focused company. by Buck2 · · Score: 1

      Jesus Christ man. You should have read for content instead of just skimmed before you flamed away.

      All your information about how much tech WalMart uses to function does not change the fact that the OP was correct in saying that WalMart is not "rooted in technology ... as much as, say, Dell ..."

      I have shopped at WalMart once in my life. I bought some foldable camping chairs. I would have a GODDAMN HARD TIME buying foldable camping chairs from Dell or HP, don't you think?

      GAFC

      --

      As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
    6. Re:Wal-Mart *IS* a technology focused company. by bmalia · · Score: 2, Funny

      About the crack about rednecks buying Lindows...what do you think the average demographic of a Wally world online customer is? I'm willing to bet it's not ma and pa kettle in podunk Arkansas.

      Ha! With your vast knowledge of Wal-Mart, SURELY you see the irony in that Wal-Mart's headquarters IS located in (and has a super-store that does a butt-load of bussiness in) a small town in Arkansas!

      If you ever went to Wal-Mart to freshen up for a date... --Jeff Foxworthy

      --
      There's no place like ~/
    7. Re:Wal-Mart *IS* a technology focused company. by joeblakethesnake · · Score: 1

      And I bet you don't see the irony in the fact that Wal-Mart.com (actually a separate company from Walmart Corporation, its a parnership between Walmart and another tech company) is headquartered in Silicon Valley.

    8. Re:Wal-Mart *IS* a technology focused company. by Rob.Mathers · · Score: 1

      Although I don't doubt that your point about WalMart being a very tech dependant company (what company isn't these days after all?), you seem to have missed the original posters point in that quote.
      He says that "Walmart isn't really rooted in the technology industry," and it's true. WalMart may use all sorts of technology, and more so than other companies, but it is not a member of the technology industry. It doesn't manufacture chipsets or routers or anything else. It is definitely a customer of the tech industry, but WalMart is a member of the retail industry, NOT the technology industry.

      --

      My other sig is funny!
    9. Re:Wal-Mart *IS* a technology focused company. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because there is no irony. Wal-mart is not a tech-focused company and so they can't run their website on their own. Duh.

    10. Re:Wal-Mart *IS* a technology focused company. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahahah... Bullshit... He said "walmart isn't rooted in the technology industry". You saw "walmart", "technology", and a negative, and proceeded to share with Slashdot all your amazing insider information. You: 'duuuhhhhh, they have a giant database, muh, so they *must* be rooted in the technology industry' (drools).

    11. Re:Wal-Mart *IS* a technology focused company. by Comrade+Brightski · · Score: 1

      Did you fail high school english? I would recommend actually reading the entire post before automatically hitting reply and karma whoring. The statement "Wal-Mart isn't really rooted in the technology industry" is 100% accurate if you read carefully. Being rooted in the industry and being powered by new technology are two ENTIRELY different things. From the standpoint of sales, which is what's being discussed, Wal-Mart is about as dependent on computer sales as Microsoft is on the price of potatoes. Anyone that doesn't believe this can check Wal-Mart's steady growth rate throughout the recent tech slump.

      Yes, as you pointed out, they have an advanced framework powering their business. But so does almost any gigantic, successful company. This is remarkable, but has nothing to do with their risk involved in selling PCs.

      --
      "Software is like sex. It's better when it's free." -Linus Torvalds
    12. Re:Wal-Mart *IS* a technology focused company. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And guess which company will drive over __**anything**_ , including Billgzbub's Microsoft
      if they smell a cost saving.

      Yeah, Walmart, the company that lives to shave a
      whatever it can off a price point, and Free Software.

      A marrage made in Heaven.

    13. Re:Wal-Mart *IS* a technology focused company. by Tony-A · · Score: 2

      I'd say that he was very on-target.
      This is consumer electronics at a few hundred a pop instead of home computing at a few thousand a pop. That Walmart has experience on the bleeding edge of "new" technology is quite relevant.

  115. the thing that bothers me by Richthofen80 · · Score: 2

    is that most people who buy computers at wal-mart are clueless, and 90% of the time, so are the salespeople. I think people won't even know they are getting something different, then be incredibly pissed when their spider solitare doesn't run on it.

    --
    Reason, free market capitalism, and individualism
  116. rednecks won't buy these until... by nvts · · Score: 2, Informative
    they carve out a section of the actual stores and attempt to sell them. Remember this is just their online store. The online store sells MANY MANY more items than the real stores sell.


    This will be big news when the redneck can actually walk into a Walmart and see the Lindows computer on the shelf and put it in their cart.

    1. Re:rednecks won't buy these until... by buckeyeguy · · Score: 2

      So, in other words, to buy one of these, you have to have access to a PC already? Hmm, kinda defeats the 'unwashed masses' image of who's going to be buying these things.

      --
      I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
  117. openoffice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone know if OpenOffice will be available on this? It would be a good start at reducing dependenc on MS Office. It also needs mozilla........

    1. Re:openoffice? by dontkillme · · Score: 2, Informative

      Lindows is just repackaged debian with a nice front end to apt-get. From what I hear they're making OpenOffice available on their click-n-run warehouse in the near future, but the standard linux version of OpenOffice from openoffice.org runs fine.

  118. Appropriate Simpsons Quote by DeadSea · · Score: 5, Funny
    Homer: Look at these low, low prices on famous brand-name electronics!

    Bart: Don't be a sap dad. These are just crappy knock-offs.

    Homer: I know a genuine 'Panaphonics' when I see one. And look, there's 'Magnet Box' and 'Sorny'!

    Salesman: [walking up] Listen, I'm not going to lie to you. Those are all superior machines. But if you like to watch your TV, and I mean _really_ watch it, you want the Carnivale'. [shows Homer and Bart a TV very similar to their old one] It features two-pronged wall plug, pre-molded hand grip well, durable outer casing to prevent fallapart...]

    Homer: Sold. You wrap it up, I'll start bringing in the pennies.

    [3F11] Scenes from the Class Struggle in Springfield

  119. My moma's daughter is my wife... by JLT+MeL · · Score: 1

    I'll have to divorce my sister if she don't hurry and purchase me that newfangled Lindows machine...

  120. others will need to compete now by awptic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think the most interesting part of this is that now other stores selling computers will have to find ways of competing with these insanely low priced computers, and I think the first thing they'll do is throw out Windows. Although alot of people will disagree, I think ESR had a good point when he said that microsoft would be doomed when the cost of PC hardware dropped below that of Windows, and we're almost at that point already.

    1. Re:others will need to compete now by DanThe1Man · · Score: 2

      Wern't some PCs "free" a couple of years ago? (with long term dail-up accounts) That didn't kill Windows.

  121. Prices. by wolf- · · Score: 1

    The prices are NOT that much better than a new dell, when bought under the right promotion. AND, walmart vs dell on technical support, hrm.

    Machine that runs "almost all windows applications" or machine the runs windows applications?

    --
    ----- LoboSoft specializes in Digital Language Lab
    1. Re:Prices. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Have you ever called Dell tech support ?

      I'd rather ask the old guy who says hello when I come through the door of Walmart how to fix my computer.

  122. Predictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    This will cause massive confusion among customers who equate "computer" with "Windows", and don't even realize that there are compatibility issues with different OS's (or different releases of the same OS).

    Within six months WalMart will join Dell in backing off from Linux on the desktop once they see that the boxes just won't sell to their customer set without Windows preinstalled.

    The result of all this will be that the vast majority of the business market will only become further entrenched in their opinion that Linux makes a very nice low and mid-level server OS, but has too many problems to use on the desktop.

  123. Very interesting double standard by ilsie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I find it interesting that /.ers see Microsoft as an evil corporation (for obvious reasons) and Wal-Mart as a champion of the people because they are selling Lindows boxes, even though Wal-Mart shamelessly exploits Maquiladora sweatshop labor, lies about it's products being made in the USA, and forces artists to censor their music, among other things.

    At least the people Microsoft empoly get paid well.

    1. Re:Very interesting double standard by owlmeat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not everyone has a double standard here. There's plenty of negative comments about Wal-Mart and I, for one, do not see this thing as being a victory of any sort for Linux. Wal-Mart is simply using the cheapest (as in beer) product that is available. There's no regard to the actual useability of the product. Chances are that 80 percent of these machines will be running a bootlegged copy of Win within 48 hours of purchase.

      --
      They stab it with their steely knives,

      But they just can't kill the beast.

    2. Re:Very interesting double standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see Wal-mart's evil as less than that of Microsoft's. *shrug*

      One enemy at a time, chummer, one enemy at a time.

    3. Re:Very interesting double standard by bluGill · · Score: 2

      True, but all of wal-mart's compititon is worse. Wal-Mart happily sells guns. Target won't touch them, and K-Mart will sell them, but the company has made it clear they don't like it.

      Every weekend in summer I can go to wal-mart and get my car washed by some local community charity. Wal-mart seems to encourage this, Target will not allow it. (I don't know about K-mart)

      Wal-mart has problems i'll agree. They are still better for the comunity than Target or K-Mart, so I shop at Wal-Mart when I can live with cheap over quality, which is often. There are several "little guys" in town who sell stuff that appears to compete with Wal-Mart, and they can do so because they have better service, or higher quality. Before Wal-Mart they might have had quality, but I never shoped there when I has a choice because they didn't have service.

      As for censoring of music, I find that most people think it is a good idea, so long as goverment isn't doing it. If you really want dirty music you can get it, there is no law against it. You just have to look harder.

  124. This is a good thing.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No comment about Lindows, however this is a very good thing for the Linux community in general. Specifically, a lowish cost PC that is completely Linux Compatable - bonus.

    Having to spec a PC for Linux is a pain. As someone who has always had problems with Modems & Video (ATI), I think that a widely available low cost PC that is pre-checked Linux compatable is great.

    No modem problems - bonus
    No problems with video - bonus
    Lindows runs as roon - bogus (how about BSD guys? put on OpenOffice; Mozilla ...)
    Likely POS kit - bogus
    cheap - bonus
    widely available - bonus

    Bonus 4
    Bogus 2

    I say, I'll get one next week ;)

  125. wtf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you even link to ONE comment posted that would support your position? Or are you just bullshitting because it's "cool" to slander geeks? Ahh, just as I thought.

  126. did anyone notice... by Heironymus+Coward · · Score: 1

    ... that the link is to an order form on the Wal*Mart site?

    as near as I can tell, Wal*Mart is not selling these in stores. so stereotypes aside, "legions of rednecks" are not going to be buying these computers.

    legions of wannabe geeks will.

  127. I almost bought one by Col.+Panic · · Score: 2

    and then I realized I already have nine computers at home. Now if they offered it on T.V. and said the girl with the pretty smile was waiting to take my credit card info ... THEN I would be persuaded.

  128. Click-n-run security issues? by mesozoic · · Score: 2

    I've been wondering about this Click-n-Run thing they've got going, where you click a web link to install software packages (like Apache) on your computer. Some you have to pay for, some are free. One of the requirements, they say, is that you are running the browser that came with Lindows -- presumably because there is some sort of extension they've put on to support it.

    Now, doesn't this seem terribly insecure to anyone else? Allowing web pages to install software onto your computer is the sort of thing Windows does, and Linux doesn't, and I'm happy for that distinction. Does anyone (any Lindows insiders, maybe?) have any more info on this?

  129. You are *such* an asshole by HardwareLust · · Score: 0

    Managed to sneak a pretty good troll in, didn't you?

    Grow up. Now there's going to be two people on my 'ignore' list. Katz is the other one. Nice to know you've been lumped in with that moron, eh? What's next, movie reviews?

    Rest in peace. You deserve it.

    --
    ...not that I'm a pirate.. Hell I've never even fired a cannon. - oldwolf13
  130. Just like NASCAR by GungaDan · · Score: 3, Funny
    "If it crashes a lot, will anyone notice?"

    Rednecks only watch it for the crashes.

    --
    Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
  131. OT: Wal*Mart /. effect??? by dwcasey · · Score: 1

    I would think a company like WM could handle the /. effect. No?

  132. Computer techs are already a dime a dozen. by glrotate · · Score: 1

    Some of us were smart/lucky two or three years ago and decided to go back to get our masters and phds.

    If you are a consultant or in house IT staff, than in all actuality you are just another laborer. The premium that a geek could recieve from the market has been going down down down. For example look at the article Cisco qualifications ain't what they used to be . The average CCIE salary went down 21% last year. Geeks are now just the loser guy that fixes the damn computer.

    1. Re:Computer techs are already a dime a dozen. by mrm677 · · Score: 2

      I went back for my M.S. degree 10 months ago, and have another year or two to go. Do you consider me "smart/lucky"?

  133. World's largest retailer by ayeco · · Score: 1

    ok folks, just remember that Wal-mart is the world's largest company.

    1. Re:World's largest retailer by vidarh · · Score: 2

      Well, Yahoo is wrong. Microsofts market cap is still larger than Wal-Marts. Not by that much, though, since Microsoft is down 40% of so from their peak.

  134. WalMart? What's with you people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What exactly is the American fascination with WalMart? You people have a real hard-on for it, and I've never been able to figure out why. WalMart came to Canada a few years ago -- and it looks prety much like any other cheap retailer of crappy consumer goods and cheap made-in-Singapore "fashions".

    Can anyone explain this to me?

  135. Walmart is no hero..... by Sesq · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What makes so many of you think this is a good thing? Walmart isn't making this move in order to support OSS or promote Linux. They're doing it to sell cheap computers. They couldn't care less about Linux.

    What I see happening is a bunch of people buying these Lindows boxes believing that they can run any Windows software on it. When they find out this is not the case, they'll blame Linux/Lindows. Then they will have a (albeit misguided) distaste for Linux and be convinced that MS is the only way to go.

    I don't see this as any kind of victory. I see it as a disaster waiting to happen.

    1. Re:Walmart is no hero..... by BrainInAJar · · Score: 1

      I thought one of the reasons that OSS advocates gave for running linux was that it was cheap? I think it's a great thing. People will come to realize that linux is a great way to save $200 or so on a computer. Sure, some of them might be pissed off, but they don't matter, they'd never use linux anyways. It's the people that use it and are impressed that matter. Even not them, but their kids. Give the kids something and they'll want to learn more about it (at least I did as a kid) and probably move to a real distro.

  136. If these run Lindows, they run real Linux- cheap! by aquarian · · Score: 2

    Now we have a steady supply of pre-assembled, Linux-compatible computers for $299. Who can complain about that? If these machines run Lindows, they'll run our favorite Linux distribution too. How well, I don't know, but at least drivers exist for all the hardware.

  137. Wal-Mart IS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wal-Mart has a very interesting information systems infrastructure. They have a huge database that tracks everything you buy with a credit card or check. They keep records of how much cornflakes you buy, what magazines you like, or how often you buy condoms. People might say that other merchants do this as well, but no one can do it on the scale of Wal-Mart. It's almost impossible to get by in some places without going to Wal-Mart to buy the things you need. And so Wal-Mart is in the perfect position to know how you live.

  138. oh just shut up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Does the phrase "politically correct fuckshit" mean anything to you? Guess why I make fun of geeks? Because it's funny. Guess why I make fun of rednecks? Because it's funny.

    If you want to live in your politically correct bubble, why don't you go into politics so you can steal more of my money?

  139. NO love lost for Walmart, but "rednecks"? by Bravo_Two_Zero · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hey, I'm not going all "PC" on y'all (pun intended), but instead of "redneck", think "your grandmother and/or your mother". I know Walmart is a popular hangout for the bumbles of the world, but they have a really long reach in terms of mass-market retail access. They are, for all intents, the Sears Roebuck of this generation. Everyone goes to Walmart at some point. If you want our favorite GPL operating system going to the masses, this is the way to make it happen.

    Now, if Target would just do the same thing with a slightly upscale ($50 increase), neatly-designed case in the fashion of most of their homegrown goods, we'd really be in business.

    --


    Amateurs discuss tactics. Professionals discuss logistics.

  140. Hopefully Lindows makes a good impression. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can it? It's not even released yet! It'll crash or do "funny" things on most apps anyone tries to run. And Walmart customers won't be as forgiving as /. readers.

    It'll come off as a pile of sh*t and without doubt cause more harm to the Linux community.

    Oh well.

  141. Now you'll replace junk Linux for good Linux... by Linegod · · Score: 2, Funny

    Will it never end? I use to buy PCs, remove the junk OS, and install Linux. Now I get the chance to buy a PC with a junk Linux on it, wipe it and install a good distro. Seems more like a lateral move than an upward one.

    .

    --
    -- I care not for your foolish signatures.
    1. Re:Now you'll replace junk Linux for good Linux... by Kredal · · Score: 2

      But you're paying 100 dollars less for the junk linux than the junk MS!

      Looks like a upward move to me!

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
  142. This is big by lelitsch · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And not for the legions of rednecks. But if I were a redneck parent or teacher at a school with a small IT budget, I'd be over at Walmart for the 850MHz Duron in a New York minute and get the truck loaded. At $299 and no Microsoft tax, one could even get a few extras for trash-on-break tech support. Hell, I might even buy a few and spread them around the house as email/web stations, MP3 players and use up all the old monitors I was thinking about throwing away for five years. Another good thing about Walmart is that they are far less annoying about returns replacements than the BestBuys of this world.

    1. Re:This is big by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't forget the lindows tax.. Lindows isn't free either.

  143. ah yes rednecks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well at my store it's usually filled with dumb ass niggers...

  144. Uh-oh by Jacer · · Score: 1

    for the majority of the consumers they won't know the difference between windows and lindows, and in all fairness the sales person at wal-mart probably won't either.....

    --
    --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
  145. Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you could just tell them it IS working as well as windows when it doesn't run the applications.

  146. For once a true Linux advantage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Remember when Dell offered Linux on 'selected configurations'?

    They arranged their site so as to make side-by-side comparisons of Linux/Windows configurations difficult, and for good reason. The Linux configurations always gave you less hardware for more money (including the OS) than the closest Windows-based configurations. Dell support for Linux? A big fat lie.

    Well, the Wal-Mart Microtek pages are a completely different story. You get 1 page with all the no-OS systems and another with all the Lindows-based systems. Not only do the Lindows-based systems cost the same as comparable 'naked' systems, they actually seem a little more current on the hardware. The $598 Lindows box has a 1.8GHz P4 compared to a 1.6GHz P4 on the $599 naked box. So, if you're not happy with the choice of Lindows, it looks like at least it's not costing you anything. Replace it with RH, Mdk, etc. At least you know the hardware is supported.

    In other words, it looks like Wal-Mart's support for Linux is real, unlike Dell, which was either
    1. Jumping on the Linux bandwagon to preempt IBM.
    2. Providing a 'no monopoly' fig leaf for MS at a high point in their anti-trust trial.

    Either way, Dell was definitely setting Linux up to look bad. And then they pulled it from the market citing 'lack of demand'. Hell, you don't even see Linux mentioned for servers any more in Dell catalogs, despite the recent RH/Dell/Oracle announcement. No friend in Dell. And unless you can convice me otherwise, an outight enemy (despite the disingenuous lip service).

  147. Ever tried Office a couple of years ago? by Steveftoth · · Score: 1

    Before MS Office 98 or so, MS had all the same problems that you are describing and you know what, people still used it. The only reason to use ms office is because everyone else uses it.

    Even if the file formats were 100% compatable, people would still use MS office because it is what ever one else is doing.

    1. Re:Ever tried Office a couple of years ago? by Telastyn · · Score: 1

      Of course, but before MS Office 98 or so there wasn't any better options. Now there is. I mean I hate office. I hate supporting god forsaken Outlook, and I hate having to fekking scp word or PDF docs around so I can actually view them. I'd LOVE if there were open, intelligent formats and protocols for everything.

      But if you look today MS Office is the best suite (today). I expect/hope that OpenOffice will pull even, and surpass MS in 15 months or so; but it's not there yet.

    2. Re:Ever tried Office a couple of years ago? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is wrong with OpenOffice though? I am having no problem what-so-ever doing word processing and spreadsheet work with Open Office, and from what I have seen it does things faster and better quite often than MS Office.

      Don't tell me that you are just another person that is griping because the MS DOC filters to open up Microsoft proprietary file formats totally perfectly.

      As a matter of fact, today I had to explain to a friend how to take a file from an MS Office 2000 machine and print it out on a machine with Office 97. He had never had to change the file format before now, and it was within two Microsoft programs. What is the problem with getting people to use Star Office and it's XML based format?

      OpenOffice is a damn fine program, especially at its cost. Nothing personal, but all of the little gripes about it are from people who just want to keep offering excuses for paying for MS Office. It took years for Microsoft Office to become a halfway decent and usable software suite, but it only took 18 months of dedicated coding and hacking to turn Sun/Star Div.'s software into an excellent alternative. I can't thank the OpenOffice team enough for their work.

  148. Now who's the 800 pound gorilla? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Annual revenue from SEC filings:

    Microsoft $25 Billion
    Walmart $217 Billion

    Muahaha!!

  149. on slandering geeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it is and always has been cool to slander geeks and it will continue to be for the simple reason that geeks are strange

    not just a little wierd, i mean *really* strange. example - there was a post on /. a while back advocating the use of userfriendly's geekfinder which i checked out

    a post from a girl whose geek code seemed compatible drew my attention and as i read i became convinced she was worth contacting - one line really got me, something about clothing being a thermoregulatory device. awesome. the last sentence went something like this "I am also a hardcore leather pervert."

    now this sort of thing might be your cup of tea, or she might have been telling a (funny!) joke 'cause I laughed my ass off, but i believe she was not kidding.

    geeks - be afraid ... be very afraid

    1. Re:on slandering geeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't geekfinder a resume/jobs service?

  150. Who's paying for Office? by aquarian · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I doubt the target audience for these machines is shelling out $$$ for Office. I'm sure they'd love to have a cheap computer that will run a "borrowed" copy, though.

  151. They talk UNIX, not Linux by InodoroPereyra · · Score: 1
    A lot of posters are concerned about the possible negative PR this could bring for Linux if people get frustrated. I think that Lindows prestige is at stake, not Linux'. If you follow the link to wal-mart in the article, it just reads:

    These computers do not ship with Microsoft Windows. They ship with an exciting new UNIX based Operating System (OS) named Lindows. This exciting new OS delivers the stability of UNIX with the ease of Windows and the ability to run most Microsoft programs. These computer systems are a perfect low cost alternative to computers preloaded with Microsoft Windows.

    That is: no mention at all of Linux.They sell "Lindows" as "Easy UNIX". Having people try alternative OSs is a good thing anyway. Let's see how it turns out, it looks exciting to me so far.

    Cheers,
    Don Inodoro

  152. deja vu, OS/2 by paulbiz · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Let's take a technically superior OS and try to sell the fact that it's able to run most of microsoft's crap.

    Where have I heard that before?

    1. Re:deja vu, OS/2 by MImeKillEr · · Score: 1

      Not totally correct -- IBM had access to the Windows code until MS came out with Windows 3.11 - the "upgrade" from 3.1 to 3.11 was designed (some at IBM thought, at least) to render OS/2 unable to hook into the Windows OS.

      When 95 came out, OS/2 had lost most, if not all, compatability except with legacy products.

      How do I know? I used to work at IBM supporting OS/2 from 94-96.

      --
      Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
  153. Gotta Love the Linux Crowd by LordYUK · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You guys are as fickle as a dumb blond. Yesterday it was "blast Bioware they arent supporting Linux out of the box" and now its "Blast Wal-mart FOR trying to support a Linux distro"! Which is it guys? I mean, COME OFF IT! You dont REALLY want Linux to be mainstream, do you? No, I didnt think so. If you did, you'd be WILLING to help "J Bubba Jr." to not only install his mouse, but actually RUN a program or two on his new l33t machine! Instead, 99% of you are pissy. Why?? A MAJOR RETAILER (like it or not, they ARE) is selling a LINUX COMPUTER. CHEAP TOO! It doesnt make sense. Or is it just because you're starting to realize that if EVERYONE switches to linux, you'll no longer be l33t hax0rs??

    --
    This is my sig. Its pathetic.
    1. Re:Gotta Love the Linux Crowd by jcast · · Score: 1

      Correction 1% of the Linux and GNU/Linux crowd is ``pissy'' about this. The other 99% of us are silently celebrating, emailing our friends and neighbors, buying champaign, etc.

      --
      There are reasons why democracy does not work nearly as well as capitalism.
      -- David D. Friedman
  154. AOL the Killer App. by bstadil · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I am wondering why nobody has mentioned AOL. The ability to run the AOL client is the killer app. for this type of machine. The issue is not a $200+ office suite for a $266 machine, the issue is for the whole family to be able to get onto the internet "safely" and send Pic's to Grand-Ma.

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
    1. Re:AOL the Killer App. by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      Spot on. At the risk of adding more geek snobbery to an already condesending-to-the-redneck-population thread, I'll bet that at least 7 out of 10 Walmart shoppers with computers are AOL subscribers.

      Unless Lindows has a trick up their sleeve with Wine or a full port of the AOL client, these folks are in for a bit of a shock.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    2. Re:AOL the Killer App. by G00F · · Score: 2

      Well, aol behind the sceens is anti-ms, and pretty linux friendly, I would say they just might release a linux version of aol.

      And that might also be the worst virus to hit linux ever too.

      --
      The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions that I wish it to be always kept alive
    3. Re:AOL the Killer App. by ajboyle · · Score: 1

      AOL **is** one of the apps that Lindows claims to support. At least it's been up on their Click-n-Run site for a while.

      I have yet to see a post here from someone who's tried the latest (prerelease) Lindows with some MS software. Does MS Office install on Lindows?

    4. Re:AOL the Killer App. by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 2

      Just try plugging in that hardware to get those pictures to Grandma.

    5. Re:AOL the Killer App. by DanThe1Man · · Score: 2

      MS office runs great with regular WINE.

  155. When will Microsoft foil Wine? by aquarian · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wonder how long it will take for Microsoft to start using code that foils Wine...

    1. Re:When will Microsoft foil Wine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last I checked, wine won't run explorer.exe (the windows shell).

    2. Re:When will Microsoft foil Wine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are allready doing it.

      The installer for dungeon siege wants to load itself into a memory location that linux just doesn't like. WineX has been changed to fool the DS installer into thinking that is where it really got loaded.

  156. It proves nothing..... by owlmeat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think that Wal-Mart just wanted a throwaway OS to mount on these machines. I predict that 80 percent of them will be running a pirated copy of Win within 48 hours of purchase.

    --
    They stab it with their steely knives,

    But they just can't kill the beast.

    1. Re:It proves nothing..... by LordNimon · · Score: 1

      20% marketshare in a previously untapped market is damn good, I think.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
  157. Support? by Mignon · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Not that I'm thinking of buying one of these (got enough computers these days) but this is exciting.

    What I'm curious about is the tech support issue. It seems to me that by offering a Lindows pre-installed PC, it's now in Wal*Mart's interest to see Lindows be as stable as possible and as compatable with Windows applications as possible.

    Does anyone suppose they plan to help out Lindows development if, say, the next version of some popular Windows software doesn't work with Lindows? Now that would really impress me. (And then I'd think about buying one of these boxes.)

  158. And it will succeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why?

    The key argument is 'JOHNNY IDIOT DOESNT NO HOW 2 THAT HE CANT INSTALL OMG OMG NEED 2 CHECK OS REQUIREMENTS WTF!!!'

    Make sense? No, it doesn't. In ages past, people had no problem figuring out that their Mac or MS Windows PC couldn't run the other's software. The fact that Lindows is aiming for compatability with actual MS Windows software makes this even less of a problem.

    You know what the average Wal-mart computer buyer will want to do? Check their e-mail, maybe surf the web a little, drink a cool Coors 16 ouncer on the weekends while using the box to play mp3s.

    Lindows can allow all of that.

    I'm glad I didn't stop shopping at Wal-mart when all the K-mart people here were whining about how Wal-mart used unfair business practices/etc.

  159. Many happy returns by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

    when buyers learn it won't run all the apps they expect it to.

  160. a legion of rednecks by LWolenczak · · Score: 2

    A legion of rednecks? Where? 6000 rednecks could only mean a country or bluegrass concert is near by!?!?!?!?! Run for the hills... Run for your lives!!!!

    1. Re:a legion of rednecks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lock up your daughter and the cat!

  161. Hehe... Root Redneck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's worse, is it's gonna be a bunch of rednecks running as root!

    1. Re:Hehe... Root Redneck by orkysoft · · Score: 3, Funny

      Rootnecks?

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    2. Re:Hehe... Root Redneck by rsborg · · Score: 1

      Heh,

      And they'll be running on Rednix

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    3. Re:Hehe... Root Redneck by orkysoft · · Score: 2

      To be more precise, the Roothat distribution :-P

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
  162. hooray!!! by winME_hacker · · Score: 1

    New Linux Game Ports!
    Deer Hunter 5
    Nascar 2003
    Now everyone can be 3l337 (funny program)

  163. The next version of MS Office won't run on Lindows by rector · · Score: 1

    Even if you are right, the next version of MS Office won't run on Lindows anyway.

  164. ut is Linux ready for the mainstream? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All this is well and good, but I have a feeling that Linux is just not ready for the average consumer. From what I've seen most newbies have a really hard time figuring out Linux even just to get simple tasks done.

    Another problem is that we'll be seeing a lot of unsecured Linux boxen hooked up to the Internet. The average consumer is not going to be downloading the latest security updates--he or she probably doesn't even know what they are, let alone where to download them and how to apply them.

    Maybe that would make a good open-source project--a program that automatically administrates a Linux-based computer. It would manage Internet security, watch the log files, and periodically ask to download updates.

  165. Walmart clerks trained for this?! by Gudlyf · · Score: 1
    I can just see it now...

    Customer: What's this here 'Lindows' thingy on this here computer?
    Clerk: Um...I guess it's just like Windows. It sounds like "Windows".

    --
    Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
  166. COULDN'T FIND TASKBAR?. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With RH7.3, I'm going to take a wild assumption and take a guess this person was using KDE3. How could you NOT find the taskbar? It's that large bar at the bottom with buttons that change when you mouse over them? By default, the taskbar is glaring on a RH7.3 install of KDE3, and at the bottom, just like in Windows. Either this person really is stupid, or it wasn't a default install of KDE3.

    1. Re:COULDN'T FIND TASKBAR?. by bilbobuggins · · Score: 1

      the task bar meaning the little applet that shows you all your open apps and you can click on them a la windows.
      NOT the panel, which includes the clock, desktop selector, quick launch/menu icons...

  167. just great by Highlordexecutioner · · Score: 1

    What about all of us that work the phones at an ISP? Where I work we have about 100k users. A good portion of those bought their computers at Wal-Mart.
    Users have enough trouble running Windows, so Lindows will just confuse them even more.

    --
    Where am I going and why am I in this handbasket?
  168. So True by phriedom · · Score: 1

    And furthermore, even IF a bunch of rednecks shop at Wal-Mart, thats okay. Rednecks buy computers too, and their money is just as green as anyone's, which is what it takes to get more companies writing software and drivers for *nix.

    --
    Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
  169. The Proles by InnovativeCX · · Score: 1

    Hehe..."If there is hope, it lies within the proles." -George Orwell, 1984

  170. So soon? Eric Raymond was right! by s390 · · Score: 2

    Damn! According to the so-called "conventional wisdom" of ZDnet, Gartner, Mindcraft and the rest of those paid Microsoft shills (including Asscrack's DoJ), there must be Mach-3 supersonic pigs screaming through the raging ice-storms down in Hell today.

    There's suddenly an affordable, easily usable by Joe and Jane SixPack, and completely Microsoft free PC on sale to even ordinary consumers! Eric Raymond's prophecy is realized much earlier than anyone might have thought. He even nailed the price point at $300. Few people who buy these PCs will shell out as much or more for Microsoft Office since it already comes with OpenOffice all loaded up and ready to use. This is just awesome. Right on, Eric! It's all downhill for Microsoft now; they're done, dead, gone.

    Wal-Mart's cheap (but good enough) consumer PCs will force Dell, HPQ, and other vendors to match their price, which they won't be able to do with Windows and Office preloaded. They will simply have to offer Microsoft-free PCs to compete, or they'll lose marketshare. And that's more important to them than their former subservience to Microsoft. Look for Dell, HPQ, even IBM PCs sprouting Linux or Lindows real soon. Hopefully after you manage to sell any Microsoft stock you might have in your portfolio.

    I'm telling all my non-37337 relatives and friends to jump on this before Wal-Mart sells out all their stock and/or recognizes the tremendous demand and raises their prices. Shee-it, a $300 Internet-ready, M$-Office compatible, multimedia PC? Anyone who doesn't have a fast and capable machine already is going to want one of these things, if only because it's the price of a game console and can do so much more! Amazing, great, wonderful, all those things. Microsoft is toast, their stranglehold on the PC is broken.

  171. OS Competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't get this joke.How about: concurrency is welcomed in this case?
    We have a monopolist who can play the god and the bad weather.
    Would you nowadays skip a popular taiwaneese pcs in favor
    of the original IBM AT?

  172. Just like to point out by jaaron · · Score: 1

    For all of you out there that are worried about whether some poor innocent PC user is going to pick up this Walmart PC/Lindows combo and become totally befuddled with this new fangled Linux thing and just be turned off to the whole idea, I'd like to just point one thing out: it's only available on the web. If someone is actually shopping at Walmart's web site it shows they already have some computer savvyness. The ONLY place I've heard about this is on linux-related sites. This isn't being marketed to everyone. It's not like they've got demos of linux PC's in aisle 10.

    That being said, I am surpised that it's Lindows that's being used. It's in beta for one thing. Despite the claims for running Windows software, I'd almost rather they put Lycoris or even Mandrake on these computers just so that there aren't any dillusions of Win32 compatablility.

    --
    Who said Freedom was Fair?
  173. Ok, One Redneck Joke by DrNibbler · · Score: 1

    Will it still ship with Wine? Will they have to rename it MoonShine for better acceptance?

    --
    Sean.OutaHere()
  174. See also, the Iowa story by PurpleHigh · · Score: 1

    For another example of snobbery, see also Iowa Court May Order Microsoft Refunds.

    I guess if we don't all buy our gear exclusively online or live in a congested, polluted urban area, we're not worthy.

    For all its faults, Walmart sure stands out in some areas. Where else can you go at 3 AM to buy a computer peripheral, and be able to choose from a fairly wide selection too? And I feel a lot better about trying to return something to Wallyworld than any 'elite' online dealer.

    1. Re:See also, the Iowa story by zenasprime · · Score: 1

      you should be in bed at 3am not shopping at your local megamart.

      :)

      z(p)

  175. "BSD Linux" by karmawarrior · · Score: 2

    Apparently Lindows is based on BSD Linux. Major misprint or what people have been asking for for a while (BSD/Linux would be BSD userland + Linux kernel, as opposed to GNU/Linux which is GNU OS + Linux kernel)?

    It does answer the licencing questions - I recall Apple saying that the reason why BASH wasn't shipped as the Mac OS X shell was because it would then become a major component of the operating system and arguably the GPL licence would then apply to the entire distribution.

    OTOH, it could be a typo.

    --
    KMSMA (WWBD?)
  176. only a matter of time... by i7dude · · Score: 1

    "To think of the legions of rednecks who could now possibly be running Lindows instead of Windows..."

    how long until we see front lawns adorned with motherboard-less cases resting on cinderblocks???

    dude.

  177. OpenOffice *isn't* enough by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

    every OSS word processor I've used has opened my MS word documents fine--until I turned on the spellchecker.

    For some unknown reason, it treats *every* puncuation character that isn't on the keyboard as an alphanumeric character, not a space. Until this is fixed (or it learns how to deal with em-dashes and single-character elipsis properly), OpenOffice et al will simply be unusable.

  178. Ok they beat MS lawsuit. How about GNU? by iamacat · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If you go to their website, the only link to download the OS asks you to pay $99. Since most of their stuff should be based on Linux, I would expect to see sources somewhere on the Net. Ok so they only have to give source to their customers, but if they did someone should have already posted it. Where is RMS when we need him? :-) By the way, did anyone else think about Redhat install? It mentions that the first NLS translation of the setup program was for Redneck. Wonder if that project was preserved for posterity.

  179. Re:The next version of MS Office won't run on Lind by tjw · · Score: 1


    Neither will the current one :)

    I use Office 2k with Codeweavers and it works great, but AFAIK OfficeXP support is some way off.

    --

    XJS*C4JDBQADN1.NSBN3*2IDNEN*GTUBE-STANDARD-ANTI-UB E-TEST-EMAIL*C.34X
  180. twin towers by carlcmc · · Score: 1

    is it just me or is that the twin towers in that first screen shot? a bit inappropriate eh?

    1. Re:twin towers by WeirdKid · · Score: 1

      While twin towers they may be, The Twin Towers they are not.

    2. Re:twin towers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Ok fucktard . . . . .

      First clue: that's not the twin towers, that not even NYC.

      Second: Not every reference or image the towers has to be censored, treated with kid gloves, or "put in appropriate context." Do you want to live in a society like Japan's, where large parts of history are simply ignored and not talked about ? How far are you willing to take this PC bullshit ?

    3. Re:twin towers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A society like Japan's? Having recently visited the Edo Tokyo Hakubutsukan in Tokyo, I can say the Japanese are quite frank and explicit about their history.

      Where the hell do you get off saying shit like that?

    4. Re:twin towers by CommieOverlord · · Score: 1

      The Japanese are more than willing to cover up unglamorous aspects of their history, such as the Rape of Nanking. Won't ever find that in a Japanese textbook.

      Of course, this practice is probably standard in any country.How many Canadians are aware of treatment of the Chinese immigrants who lost their lives building ours railroads in the late 1800s? How many Americans think that states came out ahead in the 1812 war (how many Americans think the "1812 Overture" is about the war in North America)?

  181. Here's a link to walmart's online store.. by gatekeep · · Score: 1

    Top Matches for "lindows" If that's any indication how they're selling them in brick & mortar stores, expect a lot of pissed of people returning them. The text of the ad states Monitor not included! in bold, but only says 'Lindows OS' I doubt the average Walmart computer shopper is going to understand exactly what they're buying here, or even notice that it's not a windows PC.

    1. Re:Here's a link to walmart's online store.. by hether · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well that's because you searched for Lindows. Most regular shoppers will not do that. If you follow the link in the original story, you do get an explanation. Same if you click on the link for Computers in the electronics part of the site or navigate through the site in any manner. Its only when you search that you don't get the description.

      These computers do not ship with Microsoft Windows. They ship with an exciting new UNIX based Operating System (OS) named Lindows. This exciting new OS delivers the stability of UNIX with the ease of Windows and the ability to run most Microsoft programs. These computer systems are a perfect low cost alternative to computers preloaded with Microsoft Windows

      Still I see your point that consumers are sometimes so stupid that they won't understand.

      --

      Most people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do.
    2. Re:Here's a link to walmart's online store.. by gatekeep · · Score: 1

      Ahh.. True, I did search for 'lindows' so I guess it's a valid assumption that I knew what it was, and was comfortable with it.

      Still, they should be extremely careful about this. All it takes is for a few people to be upset, and both Walmart and Lindows have a serious PR problem on their hand. Or worse, with wording like 'ability to run most Microsoft programs' they could find themselves in legal trouble I imagine.

      It's an interesting OS though, I'd love to play with it. I just worry they may be pushing it to your typical clueless end user a little too quickly.

  182. Now I can dump one mega corp for another by Astrorunner · · Score: 1

    Great. Dump Microsoft but patronize Wal-Mart. Which is worse?

    1. Re:Now I can dump one mega corp for another by mikethegeek · · Score: 1

      "Great. Dump Microsoft but patronize Wal-Mart. Which is worse?"

      Well, as yet, Wal-Mart is just a retailer. They do things I don't like, to be sure. They don't make things, they just sell them. And they sell many things below cost to drive out competition. Hmm... A lot like MS.

      BUT.. You can sell someone a tire, or a TV, or a fan, that is NOT from Wal-Mart that is just as identically functional and compatible.

      You can't do that with non-MS OS's, thanks to the Windows monopoly. Lindows is attemtping to change this. For that alone, they have my support.

      --
      === The price of freedom is eternal vigilance
  183. as someone who grew up in arkansas by gimpboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    for those of you who dont know walmart is a company that spawned from arkansas. the same place who brought you bill clinton. while i'm sure many of you are enjoying yourselves making fun of the ``rednecks'', consider the following:

    many of you shop there.

    currently the waltons (son's and daughters of sam so to speak) have more money than gates and ellison combined.

    all this was made by a redneck without a college education. hell i dont even think he had a highschool education.

    it's nice to see that by getting educated and growing up in a civilized society you all (y'all if you like) have become tolerant understanding people forgoing prejudice towards your fellow human beings.

    --
    -- john
    1. Re:as someone who grew up in arkansas by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2

      Bentonville (the home and headquarters of WalMart) is the only county seat to have a statue of a Confederate soldier in the town square.

    2. Re:as someone who grew up in arkansas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i believe that is a memorial for confederate soldiers.

    3. Re:as someone who grew up in arkansas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those of you who don't know, Wal*Mart is a company that was spawned from Arkansas; this is the same place that brought you Bill Clinton. While I'm sure many of you are enjoying yourselves making fun of the ``rednecks'', consider the following points:

      Many of you shop there.

      Currently the Waltons (sons and daughters of Sam, so to speak) have more money than Gates and Ellison combined.

      All this was made by a redneck without a college education. Hell, I don't think he had a high school education, even.

      It's nice to see that by getting educated and growing up in a civilized society you all (y'all if you like) have become tolerant understanding people foregoing prejudice towards your fellow human beings.

    4. Re:as someone who grew up in arkansas by zsazsa · · Score: 2

      all this was made by a redneck without a college education. hell i dont even think he had a highschool education.

      Sam Walton graduated from the University of Missouri, Columbia in 1940.

      Guess what school I go to.

      Ian

    5. Re:as someone who grew up in arkansas by uglomera · · Score: 1

      I agree, John!

      This is Marko, the guy you took Mcpherson's C class with, the "spanish" guy, remember... :)

      The general public knows that Arkansas as nothing but chicken and rednecks. But:

      1. University of Arkansas just got $300e6 from the waltons. How many of the big universities can boast with such gifts?

      2. There are students from 106 countries at the above-mentioned university. Often only the private universities are so diverse.

      3. In the past 10 years, the economic growth of Northwest Arkansas beat that of the Silicon Valley. The NWA area was mentioned as one of the top 10 places to live in the US.

      4. I personally know one of the original Linux developers (his code got included by Linus in the original Linux), and another one is one of the major Gentoo Linux developers. Both of them live and work in Northwest Arkansas. And I am not even a member of the hacking community here!

      5. The University of Arkansas programming team has been on the ACM World Finals for four years straight now. Only Stanford and the U of Virginia have done that of all the US universities.

      Just my 0.02.

    6. Re:as someone who grew up in arkansas by gimpboy · · Score: 1

      hey marko.

      when talking about the positive things in arkansas i suppose you have to include some of the negative aspects (mcphersons class ;)). send me an email letting me know what's going on.

      --
      -- john
    7. Re:as someone who grew up in arkansas by gimpboy · · Score: 2, Funny

      i was under the impression sam had a less than adiquate education. thanks for the correction.

      --
      -- john
    8. Re:as someone who grew up in arkansas by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1, Troll

      for those of you who dont know walmart..

      Walmar Watch
      Reclaim Democracy
      ..a bunch more links...

      I dont shop @ Walmart. You shouldnt either.

    9. Re:as someone who grew up in arkansas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      also be sure to realize that they treat their employees like crap. granted if you work at walmart you are at the bottom of the food chain (ok a compusa computer tech is the absolute bottom of the job food-chain) and you probably have either no skills whatsoever or are mentially shallenged to the point that a stock clerk is the best you will ever aspire to be.

      it still doesnt mean you can screw your employees like walmart does.

    10. Re:as someone who grew up in arkansas by DanThe1Man · · Score: 2

      Sam Walton graduated from the University of Missouri, Columbia in 1940.
      Guess what school I go to.


      i was under the impression sam had a less than adiquate education.

      Haha, that is the funniest flame bait and subtle insult I have read in awhile.

    11. Re:as someone who grew up in arkansas by DanThe1Man · · Score: 2

      I don't think shipping jobs over seas is a bad thing. It creats jobs for people who really need them, and the money (less of, no dought) would go a lot further in their contury then ours.

      The workers in the US should start their own company, go back to school (student loans are abundent), or apply for a better job then a factory worker. This incurages the US to become a stronger country, while helping other countries.

      The enviromental concerns are at par with any other company that causes a lot of traffic. This should be handled by good city planners. The thing about them storing pesticides and stuff outside should be taken care of. You think they could find some room inside, they are a WAREHOUSE.

      As for closeing of local shops. If they sell unique items, they should still be able to attract business. I don't feel so sorry for the ones that are offering the same old crap and higher prices (I know they charge more because they pay more for lower quenities of items)

      So, what else am I missing? Why shouldn't I shop for 'Always low prices, always.'?

    12. Re:as someone who grew up in arkansas by unitron · · Score: 2

      Do you mean the only county seat in Arkansas? 'Cause there are plenty of Confederate memorials in front of plenty of courthouses elsewhere.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    13. Re:as someone who grew up in arkansas by unitron · · Score: 2
      If, as you say, a CompUSA computer tech is the absolute bottom of the job food chain, there would be a CompUSA where I live.

      Of course we do have a Wal-Mart.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  184. $300 Duron...no FDD by MsGeek · · Score: 4, Interesting
    And at $299 for the Duron 850mhz model, who can't afford one of these.

    One little detail about that Duron (although it's probably not a big detail) is that they left out the floppy drive on that model.

    With bootable CD-ROMs and networks not having a floppy is not a big problem, but for the first-timer this could be a big problem.

    Oh yeah, Fry's is entering the $300 market soon...actually sub-$300. They will be putting out a Celeron 1GHz machine, preloaded with ThizLinux, whatever the fsck that is. They're just waiting on the shipment at this point. And this one *has* a floppy drive.

    Actually it would be better if they all did preloads with Lycoris Linux but still, it is a good thing that Walmart has the guts to do this. So far, Microsoft hasn't complained. I think they realize that even an 800lb. Gorilla like MS has to pick their battles.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    1. Re:$300 Duron...no FDD by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 2

      preloaded with ThizLinux, whatever the fsck that is

      DistroWatch Answers.

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    2. Re:$300 Duron...no FDD by asv108 · · Score: 2

      With bootable CD-ROMs and networks not having a floppy is not a big problem

      True, but if you need to flash a bios, it can be a pain in the ass.

    3. Re:$300 Duron...no FDD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CD-R + cdrecord + mkisofs + Image of a DOS floppy and you're "in the zone".

    4. Re:$300 Duron...no FDD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      great if you have another computer

    5. Re:$300 Duron...no FDD by nmos · · Score: 1

      Anyone who has any business flashing their bios can find a solution, those who cannot are better off leaving their clothes on.

    6. Re:$300 Duron...no FDD by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 2

      Better to "leave you clothes on" anyway, I had a properly done BIOS update turn my COMPAQ Armada V300 into a boat anchor, the damn thing WON'T EVEN TURN ON. Yes, I installed the right update, no, I didn't intterupt it, it clamed to have compleated suessfuly. And then on my desktop system, I haven't had problems with usin custom BIOS images to change the system boot logo.

  185. Re: Is it ready? by jonadab · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One of the fundamental principles of software
    develpment is that you can't find all the
    sticky problems until you get real users
    using the thing.

    Consider Mozilla: progress was slow until
    the 0.9.x milestones, then all of a sudden
    it was good enough that a lot of users who
    tried it liked it enough to start using it
    as their regular browser, and whammo, the
    bugs started dropping like flies, and it
    shaped up incredibly in just a few weeks.

    Same thing with Linux. Technical excellence
    aside, it was nowhere near ready for the
    typical end user until quite recently, but
    as the user base spreads beyond developers
    to end users, amazing strides are made in
    its _usability_ for end users. There's a
    breaking point somewhere, where enough
    users adopt a piece of software that the
    bugs show up and can be fixed. You don't
    reach that point without early adopters.

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  186. Wow, Windows Costs $99 !!!! by pjrc · · Score: 2
    I've always wondered what Windows really costs. Looks like you save $99 buying the same hardware with Lindows:

    $498.00 - Microsoft Windows, 1.3 GHz Celeron, 128 Meg RAM, 40 GB hard drive 52X cdrom, ethernet, modem

    $399.00 - Lindows, 1.3 GHz Celeron, 128 Meg RAM, 40 GB hard drive 52X cdrom, ethernet, modem

    Did I miss anything? The Windows machine mentions something about the graphics card, but it's "integrated" (not an AGP card), so both machines probably have the same video on the motherboard?? Is that a reasonable assumption?

    Looks like there's a reason Bill's so rich...

  187. Why this is a bad thing. by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    This reminds me a lot of when SLS came out long ago.

    They started producing several rather misleading advertisements to get people to buy the thing. Features that were not even realistic at the time.

    I know people personally who fell for it, and when the product didn't deliver to their expectations, the statement was 'well , Linux Sux'.. Understandably so, but of course not accurate.. which took some time to explain the reality of the situation.

    Luckily this didn't go too far outside the community so long term damage to our image didn't occur..

    I can see the same thing happening now, only on a *much* larger scale,( they are the largest retailer in America ) and putting us back years in the goal of desktop acceptability. ( the final hurdle ).

    I will debate that we are ready for the business desktop, but nowhere near even hoping to pretend we are ready for the general consumer market. Not yet..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  188. Do they really need Windows? by i_am_nitrogen · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I live in a redneck/hick town. I don't think of myself as better than my neighbors. I have sold computers to several of them, though. All of them want nothing more than to run an old version of Quicken to manage the books for the dairy, Word Perfect 6.0 to type letters to their grand kids, and Printshop to make birthday cards. There were a few exceptions: some of them had kids who wanted to play Star Craft and Half-Life, and one person needed to run the latest QuickBooks to handle payroll for his construction business. Most people can do anything they already do in Windows, with Linux.

    The problem for me, however, was that I was 16/17 at the time I was selling these computers, living at home. I got all my referrals from my mom, since she knew the people. She has seen me coding in a Linux console, and after seeing that, started spreading anti-Linux FUD to all the people she was referring to me ("He'll build you a great computer, but he'll try to put Linux on it -- don't let him do that."). I found this out when people started specifically asking NOT to have Linux on their machines (though I've never sold a Linux machine to anyone). Star Craft and Half-Life both run under WineX.

    What's the point of this rambling? If you are young and live at home, make sure your parents don't spread Linux FUD, and if you are older, make sure your wife doesn't spread Linux FUD, and if you're old and single, well, get out more. But the real moral of the story is: most people don't need Windows, or even the apps they're used to. Give them a few of their staple apps, such as Star Craft, Quicken, Word, and then fill in the rest with Open Source software, and slowly convert them away from their staple apps (and convert game programmers away from their staple OS). This is exactly what Lindows is doing.

    Some people think Lindows will take over Linux and become a Linux monopoly, others think Lindows will just act as the gateway into a new world of software. Whatever. See above for the point of this disjointed, redundant rambling.

  189. Re:The next version of MS Office won't run on Lind by rector · · Score: 1

    Is your Office 2k with Codeweavers stable enough to be sure that you don't need to save you text in say Word every 5 minutes? (I don't mean that I don't save changes, but sometimes it is covenient not to save changes that often.)

  190. Lycoris @ Fry's by MsGeek · · Score: 2

    I spoke too soon...maybe those sub-$300 Linux Celerons at Fry's won't come with Lycoris, but you can pick up a copy there soon.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    1. Re:Lycoris @ Fry's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I spoke too soon...maybe those sub-$300 Linux Celerons at Fry's won't come with Lycoris, but you can pick up a copy there soon.

      I bought a copy at the San Diego Fry's about two weeks ago. $30 for basic, $40 for deluxe, they had about 8 copies of each version. Nice, small DVD-cased-sized packages with two disks and the install manual. Well worth it if only for the experimental/can Dad use it? value.

  191. Judging by your robotic ATOT posts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd say you were crazy.

  192. I wonder... by Hegemony+Cricket · · Score: 1

    ...what will stop MS from taking the Apple route against folks who clone their GUI?

    Or have they tried and been shot down?

    Just seems like an avenue with precedent that MS could begin pursuing, especially since Lindows is an unabashed copy and now professional competition...but of course, I'm pretty darn ignorant and Walmart does have a whole bunch of lawyers keeping an eye out on this stuff...

    --
    "I ain't got no flyin' shoes."
    1. Re:I wonder... by mikethegeek · · Score: 1

      "Just seems like an avenue with precedent that MS could begin pursuing, especially since Lindows is an unabashed copy and now professional competition...but of course, I'm pretty darn ignorant and Walmart does have a whole bunch of lawyers keeping an eye out on this stuff...
      "I ain't got no flyin' shoes.""

      They already tried it on trademark grounds and lost. Not only did they lose, but the judge seemed inclined to STRIP them of the Windows trademark, because of it being a common word, and too generic as applied to "windowing operating system" which even MS has referred to it as.

      To go after them on other grounds wouldn't do MS much good right now. The antitrust suit isn't yet completely dead, and to go after as yet embryonic competition in this way would more or less prove all allegations against MS true...

      I believe that is the only reason why they went after Lindows on trademark, instead of on reverse engineering, or look and feel grounds.

      BTW, Apple, the king of the look and feel lawsuit, hasn't exactly had a record of success litigating it. Seems to me they only succeed in shutting down hobbyists/free software people who lack the money to defend themselves in court. Not companies like MS, who, IMO, ripped a LOT off of Aqua (in terms of functionality) in the new XP desktop...

      --
      === The price of freedom is eternal vigilance
  193. Redneck loving in front of Lindows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats just damn kewl. Now EVERY embreeding motherfucker will have a Lindows box.

    1. Re:Redneck loving in front of Lindows by xiaix · · Score: 1

      Thats just damn kewl. Now EVERY embreeding motherfucker will have a Lindows box.
      I bet that even they can spell better than you can.

      --

      Have you read the Moderator Guidelines yet?

  194. Re:The next version of MS Office won't run on Lind by jedidiah · · Score: 2

    I wouldn't be any more confident with Office2k running on Win2k. MSOffice has always been a little more buggy than any other competitor going all the way back to Win16 days.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  195. Rednecks by Vodak · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    While I am gad to see that nonMicrosoft platforms are being sent out to people that would otherwise not use them I am offended by the way this submitted used sent this article.

    This elitist tone used in the article is not only common with Slashdot regulars but with the Open Source community in general. If the community is to grow outside it's niche bounds there will be the need for some people to get the "US Vs the ignorant" out of their way of thinking.

  196. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can we quote you in a year?

  197. It's up to su by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many of us will probably ending up providing support for these things. Although not the method that we would have chosen, it's partially up to us whether this is a windfall for Linux or for Microsoft.

    At the very least this will force some consumers to learn the difference between an OS and a computer. And in the long run, that could be a great thing because it might sponsor competition.

  198. Re:OS X: Xerox PARC by t0qer · · Score: 2

    Oh and I guess Apple were real innovators when they stole their UI from xerox

  199. Wait till christmas by Treeluvinhippy · · Score: 1

    When all the thrifty, but clueless soccer Moms think it's such a great deal. They buy a Lindows box for thier kids and spend the $100 savings on video games.

    It is a good deal, however the Lindows name sounds to much like that "Other OS" and there is going to be a lot of confusion. I fear that Linux will be given a bad rep as cheap bargin software.

    --
    >
  200. FLAMEBAIT?!?!?!!? by NanoGator · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Here's my origial post, in response to somebody commenting that Walmart should be taken down:

    "Did it occur to you that the reason people go to Walmart is because it's cheap and convenient? They didn't put a musket to anybody's head.

    When I was a teenager, I had a friend that had 3 bros and 3 sis's. They *needed* WalMart to survive. If they had cheap computers running Lindows for cheap, then they'd have been able to get on the net."


    Some idiot moderator modded me down as flamebait!! I don't see why!

    I guess you can tell somebody pushed a hot-button with me. You'd be uspet too if your best friend was barely able to survive in this world because his family was too large. You can hate Walmart for their business practices, but they are one of the few places that my friend's family was forced to shop at because they had little money.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:FLAMEBAIT?!?!?!!? by wurp · · Score: 1

      I disagree with the way you were moderated. I'm unsure of my position regarding Wal-Mart...

      The question is, if it weren't for Wal-Mart, would your friend's family have had more money? Does Wal-Mart siphon more money out of the community than the amount they save you with more efficient operations?

      I dunno the answer, but it seems like the answer is the same as the answer to the question "Is Wal-Mart bad for your community?"

    2. Re:FLAMEBAIT?!?!?!!? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Does Wal-Mart siphon more money out of the community than the amount they save you with more efficient operations?"

      That's an interesting question. One's rebuttal might be that Walmart also provides jobs.

      I'm curious, though: Are there any studies or anything I could read (Not propoganda, though) that would help me understand this better?

      I think it's pretty much a foregone conclusion that places like Walmart are only going to expand. I'm curious what kind of effect that it'll have.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:FLAMEBAIT?!?!?!!? by wurp · · Score: 1

      I don't know. It's a very complex question. There is no doubt that Wal-Mart operates more efficiently than the mom-n-pop stores do, so it has to increase value overall. The problem is that they also take jobs away (not really a problem, that's what improved efficiency is all about) and give what work is left over to extremely underpaid people elsewhere. Those people are outside the US jurisdiction and we don't dictate to our companies that they can't buy things made under inhumane conditions.

      So, the operations are more efficient. Good.
      Jobs are taken from US soil where we have some reasonable restrictions for humane conditions in the workplace. Bad.
      Some of the profit reduces prices. Good.
      Some of the extra profit goes to a few people, who apparently don't feel a moral obligation to not hurt people. Bad.

      I don't know where you can get any information that isn't either propoganda from the big corps or from anti-sweatshop organizations, which I suspect are mostly run by unions, which I think are also run by people without real concern for the common good.

      If you find out, please reply to this post with links :)

    4. Re:FLAMEBAIT?!?!?!!? by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      One thing I've noticed is that Walmart has a way of attracting businesses around it. I've seen two Walmart's appear, only to have a myriad of business materialize around it. It creates an attractive location for other businesses to arrive.

      Does it balance out? I dunno. Even if the stuff sold is run by sweatshops, there is still the matter of selling and maintaining things.

      In any case, I doubt that debating it on Slashdot is going to deliver anybody to concessions. However, I'm not willing to boycott them over running sweatshops. Why? Because everything I hear is propoganda, and I never trust that type of info. There's two sides to every story.

      If anybody can recommend a good source of unbiased info on this topic, I'd really appreciate it.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    5. Re:FLAMEBAIT?!?!?!!? by bbqBrain · · Score: 1
      (I'm a little late jumping into the fray. Oh, well...)

      I understand everything you say above and can understand the appeal (even necessity) of a low-cost source of household items for many people. However, I have some serious problems with shopping at Wal-Mart/Sam's Club:
      • Most of the merchandise is second-rate. (I am fortunate enough to be able to afford better.)
      • I believe Wal-Mart's business practices to be unethical and predatory.
      By predatory, I mean that the SOP seems to be move into town, sell goods at cost (or a loss) until the competitors close shop, and raise prices to a profit-making level.

      My wife and I shop at Target and Kohl's for almost all household needs (with the occasional jaunt to the local K-Mart, which is still open, btw). The prices are still good, though perhaps a smidge higher than WMT. The quality (especially in clothing) is far superior.

      Now, however, WMT has really thrown me for a loop. My grudge against Microsoft is stronger, so I'd love to see people snap these PCs up. It just feels weird to cheer WMT on after all these years. :-) Perhaps I'll ask if I can post flyers for the local LUG inside the doors.

      --

      One of the reasons that I became a lawyer was to avoid ever having to hire one. -SPYvSPY
  201. Too bad it is from Wal-Mart by Archfeld · · Score: 2

    those guys make Nike, or M$, look like altruists. I've already sworn off Wal-Mart and Sam's club.
    Just a little bit of research will bring the Wal-Mart horror stories to light.

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  202. Oh, God. You're right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope they go to the HURD and not the BSD's. Slashbots are the lowest form of life on Earth.

  203. Reality check by gabacho · · Score: 1

    A large number of people here seem to think that the world should be Windows OR *nux. All or nothing. The reality is that some of us simply need to use one or more Windows programs to get our job done. Sometimes it is extremely difficult to swim upstream. I find it ironic that so many /.ers have adopted Bill's attitude- You run all MS or nothing.In this case it is *nix or nothing. One of the basic tenets of this crowd (I thought) is one of choice. But it seems one is somehow deficient if he/she chooses windows AND *nix. (Refer back to my first comment). The world simply is not black and white. Lindows (and others) allow the opportunity to use the best of both worlds. Re-booting is simply too much time lost and too inconvenient. Obviously Lindows (and others) are works in progress. How long has it taken Bill to get some kind of reliability? (Whether that is by design or simply fortune is another question) Yet Lindows is quickly dismissed because it MAY not work? It's all about choice. Choice will compel software to improve. There is another choice one has to make: pay or not to pay. The reality is, bills have to be paid. Lindows is not afree download.To establish a MAJOR presence in the desktop *nix software will have to be available through retail channels. This takes money. Better programs will evolve. Not everyone WANTS to tinker with the damn thing! Just install and go! If they can do that they will gladly pay.Personally, I just want a choice. Or you can download free software to most of what you want to do. But it still boils down to CHOICE! If you think everything should be given to you, move to North Korea. The mentality here seems to run from gifted to barely breathing. Some of the Wal-mart comments here and southerners (implied, mostly) are funny. And authors of some of the other comments are really struggling. But there is a huge difference between joking about stereotypes and believing these comments. I was born south of the I-10. I live south of the I-10. (no, not Florida or California) I don't own a pickup OR a dog. I have 3 vehicles (all paid for by me): an RX-7, a Jeep and a big-assed sailboat. And if I spoke with you over the phone you would glean nothing from my accent (or lack of). I do shop in Wal-mart. Also in Neiman-Marcus. Stereotypes are fine. Just don't believe in them.

    --
    (This sig has been removed at the request of the patent holder for Sigs.)
  204. good for us newbies who are scared... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I'm new to linux and this sounds GOLDEN to me. I use linux all day on a webserver, but I'm not the admin, just a dev guy. I used BSD/X11 a little bit in college, but I didn't admin that machine either.

    I've been toying with the idea of buying a bare bones and putting some distro on it, but it looks like Wally did it for me...SWEET! After I play around with actually doing linux admin stuff and using the GUI, I'll probably re-install another distro so I can learn how to do that.

    ...I know all you battle-worn *nix users will poo-poo this whole thing as 'redneck', but for people like me who are green and want to learn, it's mana baby!

    Still gotta get the ps2distro and play with that though! I wanna be the first kid on the block with my own DBZ game.

  205. Rindows by nortcele · · Score: 1

    At least that is what Walmart is calling it in Japan so it gets pronounced properly.

    Yes, I am a redneck WITH a farmer's tan. What's it to ya?

  206. Re:OS X: Xerox PARC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But the important thing was they stole it first. That's innovation. Before them, stealing was wrong.

  207. Oh Boy, Where to Begin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    First off, I work in the shipping and recieving department for Walmart's online venture. This has been a somewhat storied start here in the company, let me tell you (my best friend is in the marketing department and does product testing and write ups as well as consults on all things that are considered electronic). The decision to go forward with this boiled down to a phone call between the Marketing and Product Aquisition director and the CEO.
    Apparently the entire department from the top down was against selling the computers with an OS at all, especially the admitedly difficult to use and limited Lindows linux. Our return rate on pc's sold online has been relatively low, with about a 1 in 42 return rate (that's good in comparison to other stores in fact). Several post sales enquiries and surveys revealed (of course, you know this can be skewed anyway you want them to) that most people were installing MS products and were absolute novices with their only computer experience steming from either college or work. About 3% were installing OSs other than windows based on our numbers generated internally and we had about a 48% response vector from all parties quiried (not a bad response either).

    We are cringing... while it's not a bad os, most people just won't get it and we expect (in fact project into our return merch budget) a 1 in 5 ration on those systems shipping with Lindows to novice users and an overall return rate hike to 1 in 27 machines.

  208. Rednecks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The closest Walmart to me is in Marlton, NJ. Marlton is a neighborhood none of you open sores slashbots could even dream of being able to afford.

  209. Its gonna be harder... by slakdrgn · · Score: 1

    ...to get a cablemodem/dsl line installed.. last time I told an installer I had linux, he ran out the door screaming..

  210. one more time: by hawk · · Score: 2
    The valid trademark is *not* "windows," a word in common usage in this context at the time microsoft first shipped a product using this name, but "Microsoft Windows," as microsoft used to take great pains to point out.


    hawk

  211. Backlash from Microsoft? by irving47 · · Score: 1
    I'd love to know the following:


    Has M$ sent the BSA to Wal-Mart headquarters to audit licenses?


    What has happened to Wal-Mart's cost on M$ products?


    Maybe the ongoing lawsuit will keep them from pulling one of their tricks... I doubt it...

    --
    I had a sucky sig.
    1. Re:Backlash from Microsoft? by mikethegeek · · Score: 2

      "I'd love to know the following:
      Has M$ sent the BSA to Wal-Mart headquarters to audit licenses?"

      If they haven't... They will... But Wal-Mart is big enough to chew up and spit out even Microsoft, so that may be a place they don't want to go.

      Other than the BSA stormtroopers, MS really has nothing they can do to Wal-Mart... They can't prohibit them from selling Windows, etc, because all they sell are THIRD PARTY PC's (not their own), and retail box copies of Windows on the shelf.

      MS wouldn't even dream of taking their products off Wal-Mart shelves, it would cost them millions.

      Microsoft doesn't LIKE this, to be sure, but I dont' see a helluva lot they can do about it. The BSA is the most likely option, because they are a "third party"

      Yeah, right, that's like saying the RIAA is a third party, and not the stormtroopers of the big 5 record labels. As the BSA is of the largest software labels.

      --
      === The price of freedom is eternal vigilance
  212. Wow, I'm actually pretty impressed by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 2
    Last time I looked into Lindows, I wasn't that impressed. Though I didn't actually try it, I read up about it and flicked through the screenshots.

    My, how things changed. They've given their website a total facelift, which now looks MUCH more professional. Stuff like this:

    Clicking the "Install LindowsOS" button will automatically copy over your Outlook® email so that it can be read by the Mail program in LindowsOS. It will also copy over your bookmark files so they can still find your favorite web sites with the Browser included with LindowsOS. (Your Outlook mail and bookmarks will remain in their current location as well. Only a copy is moved to LindowsOS.) If you have a lot of mail or bookmarks, this may take a few seconds. Then you'll get a screen informing you that you need to restart your computer.

    .. impresses the hell out of me. It's a nice touch, and solves a problem many windows users will find as they transition. Also, their Click-And-Run program (cheesy name, good idea) is another nice touch: one of the best things about Linux is the huge amount of free software to get you started, minimizing transition costs. But how to get to it? Click'n'run is apt for non-geeks. It even sends you an email once it's done giving you some tips for your new program.

    Sometimes I think they've taken the Windows clone approach too far. It can (apparently) run IE/Notes and Word, which is impressive, but there will be things, especially games, that it'll barf on. Also the fact that it runs as root all the time is just a cop-out, they could have used something like kdesu to make that unnecessary. Ah well.... a good attempt though, I'm glad somebodies doing it.

    1. Re:Wow, I'm actually pretty impressed by mikethegeek · · Score: 2

      ".. impresses the hell out of me. It's a nice touch, and solves a problem many windows users will find as they transition. Also, their Click-And-Run program (cheesy name, good idea) is another nice touch: one of the best things about Linux is the huge amount of free software to get you started, minimizing transition costs. But how to get to it? Click'n'run is apt for non-geeks."

      In theroy, it looks like a great idea... I've loved the "urpmi" function in Mandrake, but this is even better. Indeed, Mandrake will have to raise their own level to meet Lindows's challenge of their spot as the top desktop Linux... Competition is good.

      It's about time someone decided to integrate Wine. It's not perfect, but it enables some apps to be run.

      "Sometimes I think they've taken the Windows clone approach too far. It can (apparently) run IE/Notes and Word, which is impressive, but there will be things, especially games, that it'll barf on. Also the fact that it runs as root all the time is just a cop-out, they could have used something like kdesu to make that unnecessary. Ah well.... a good attempt though, I'm glad somebodies doing it."

      If Linux is to suceed on the desktop, it has to grow outside Geekdom. Those are negative points, to be sure. But, remember, underneath it all, it's Unix. Which means a tinkerer has far more lattitude with a Lindows machine, which has a REAL Unix CLI underneath, than they can with XP.

      --
      === The price of freedom is eternal vigilance
    2. Re:Wow, I'm actually pretty impressed by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 2
      In theory, it looks like a great idea... I've loved the "urpmi" function in Mandrake, but this is even better. Indeed, Mandrake will have to raise their own level to meet Lindows's challenge of their spot as the top desktop Linux... Competition is good.

      Well I only ever played with urmpi for a few mins, and all I found was that it had an ugly (imho) GTK interface and wouldn't let me upgrade Mozilla (it wouldn't let me override dependancy failures).

      One thing that as I browse this catalog I'm getting a bit concerned about is.... there's too much software on Click-and-Run. Like Pingus for instance. Now Pingus is a mighty fine Lemmings clone, but it's no longer supported, and last time I tried to play it, I got a background that said 404 Texture not found - basically it's not finished. A lot of stuff in this database is like that - us geeks aren't troubled by this, and I'm often willing to use software that seems to be in a never ending beta test if it gets what I want done. To a standard Windows user though, seeing 20 programs that all do the same thing poorly won't impress them: Lindows would be better to select the best of breed as it were, rather than try to impress with sheer weight of software.

  213. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  214. Cool by certsoft · · Score: 1

    I just cancelled my order for a similar system (the original no OS series) and ordered one of these. I couldn't give a rat's ass about Lindows (I'll install Mandrake) but these new systems have 2 (instead of 1) serial ports and built in ethernet. The older system came with a CDRW drive instead of CDROM (and were $100 more expensive) but that's something I probably want to pick out myself as an addon anyway.

  215. Excuse me? by RedneckTek · · Score: 1

    To think of the legions of rednecks who could now possibly be running Lindows instead of Windows...

    This redneck uses Debian and has done so for a long time. Thank you very much!

    --
    I gave up thinking of a cool sig
    1. Re:Excuse me? by mikethegeek · · Score: 1

      "To think of the legions of rednecks who could now possibly be running Lindows instead of Windows...

      This redneck uses Debian and has done so for a long time. Thank you very much!"

      This redneck from Kentucky runs Red Hat. What else? :)

      --
      === The price of freedom is eternal vigilance
  216. Which brings up an interesting point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone needs to include a pack-in automobile window sticker that features the image of Tux urinating on a Microsoft logo.

    Come on, laugh. It's funny.

  217. The included software by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 2

    From the list:

    Software includes Mail, Word Processor, Web Browser/ File Manager, Address Book, Calculator, CD Player, MP3 Player, Microsoft? PowerPoint? Viewer, Microsoft? Word? Viewer, Microsoft? Excel? Viewer, Image Viewer

    I love the generic names for the software. Do you use Word or Word Perfect? No, I use 'Word Processor'.

    And the question marks after Microsoft... is that because they don't know and are asking the customer, or because it's not immediatly known if it's a microsoft product the purchasing guys put in these things.

    --
    The Internet is generally stupid
  218. Interview possibility by ocie · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Perhaps Slashdot should interview the president of Wal-Mart.

    --
    JET Program: see Japan, meet intere
    1. Re:Interview possibility by suss · · Score: 2

      Perhaps Slashdot should interview the president of Wal-Mart.

      President of Walmart: Slash-who?

  219. Exactly my point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why go all the way to Linux if you can go half-way with Lindows and have everything you want?

    Oh, wait ... that wasn't your point?
    Sorry.

    Kevin

    1. Re:Exactly my point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      " Why go all the way to Linux if you can go half-way with Lindows and have everything you want?"

      You have a better chance of getting everything you want going to a full Linux distribution.

      Any other points you want to make, smart A?

  220. yeah, but . . . by hawk · · Score: 2
    . . . if it wasn't mediocre, it would hardly be a replacement, now would it???


    :)


    hawk

  221. Could be a Very Bad Thing by Darth+RadaR · · Score: 2
    And you thought the $ales drones at Comp-USA were bad enough, I just can't imagine what tech support is going to be like from Wally-World especially when they're notorious for fscking over workers^W^W^W paying piss-poor wages. And you know that the hardware is going to be crap due to Wal-mart's notorious "lowest bidder, period" reputation.

    <conspiracy_theory>

    My paranoid self is thinking this might even be some sort of weird conspiracy crafted by Microsoft and Wal-Mart to completely discredit Linux by offering it to the unwashed masses who need a spellcheck to log in and installing it on the dodgiest hardware known to the planet and then blame all the problems on Linux instead of crap hardware and ignorance of computing. A few things to consider.

    C'mon, a loaded up
    AMD 850 for US$300?

    Lindows, AFAIK, doesn't offer the source code, and could very well be clandestinely operated by Microsoft (which could explain Lindows ability to run Win programs)

    This
    lawsuit could very well be propaganda to fool the public in thinking these 2 forces are opposed to each other.

    The default Lindows install could come with ftp, telnet, http, etc. all open, unsecured, and ready to r007, thus further damaging Linux's repuation.

    Just wait till $consumer deals with file permissions... "What? Whaddaya mean I don't have permission to open that file!?! I own this computer and it's my property, dammit! No one tells me what to do with my property!!!"
    </conspiracy_theory>


    Okay, I'll stop before I start feeling the urge to make an aluminum foil helmet

    --
    /*drunk.. fix later*/
  222. Confederate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    While I think every "Battle Flag of the Republic" should be burned along with the buildings they fly over, I have no problem with a Confederate memorial.

    Most of those soldiers wanted to protect their homes and families, not slavery and racism, however if you want to fly a Confederate flag, fly one that hasn't been co-opted by racists.

    Sorry about the off-topic rant.

  223. Interesting definition of 'censoring' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WalMart can decide to sell or not sell whatever they want. If the artists don't want to compromise their 'vision' they certainly aren't forced to ... oh, but that means they won't get all that filthy money that those bastards at WalMart can get them.

    I think what you meant to say is that artists who censor themselves to get WalMart sized numbers are selling out :)

    Kevin

  224. parental Linux FUD (OT) by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 2

    Um, why did your mom think Linux was eeeeeeeeevill just from seeing you use it? Why would anyone? I don't understand. (kudos for recognizing that your users just need a basic box to DO things with, by the way!)

    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
    1. Re:parental Linux FUD (OT) by i_am_nitrogen · · Score: 2

      I don't understand either. I've tried showing my parents how to use it, and they just get frustrated and walk away. However, when I didn't tell them it was Linux, and I was just showing them how to watch a dvd by logging in as the DVD user, and to watch tv by logging in as the TV user, on the home theater machine I built them, my mom, sister, dad, brother, etc. all didn't seem to have a problem with that.

      Only problem now is... the stupid Samsung DVD drive has major problems with 85% of dual layer discs (even though it says it supports them). My sister had a bunch of friends over to watch Harry Potter, and it hardlocked the system on chapter 18 (by that time, after spinning at full 12X DVD speed for over an hour, the DVD drive was at 120F as well.. the drive doesn't support spin limiting either).

      Anyone know of a good DVD drive that supports dual layer discs, as well as spin limiting with hdparm -E? My cheap-as-crap can't-remember-the-brand 56X CD-ROM drive has full spin limiting support...

    2. Re:parental Linux FUD (OT) by archen · · Score: 1

      If he was at a text prompt, I can understand. My mom reacted EXACTLY the same way when she saw me compiling the kernel. People truly are afraid of the old style computer CLI. It doesn't matter if they have to click a zillion buttions checkboxes and menus to do somethin trivial, and even if it doesn't always work - all they know is that a GUI is good. Then one day my mom walked in and saw me at a text prompt and said: "how can you use that stuff instead of Microsoft". I replied, this is Microsoft... [alt+enter] - tadah, it was a DOS prompt and MS was underneath. She never said anything about it again after that.

  225. Yeah, like "Radio Shack sells UNIX" ten years ago by dpbsmith · · Score: 2, Insightful

    About ten years ago I worked at a Fortune 500 company that made minicomputers with a proprietary OS and was starting to move into PC products hosted on XENIX.

    The extent of UNIX penetration into the desktop mainstream was a topic of constant discussion

    One day, Radio Shack announced that they would be selling UNIX-based systems. The announcement was widely carried as a news item in the trade press, often with deep-think commentary. Highly placed UNIX advocates within the company started circulating memos mentioning it, and in almost any conference-room discussion someone would say "It's all changed, haven't you heard, why even Radio Shack is selling UNIX now."

    So I did a reality check.

    About three months after the announcement, I walked into a Radio Shack. Not one of your mall stores, but one of the big Radio Shack Computer Centers or whatever they were called. I said I wanted to try out one of their UNIX systems hands-on, and I wanted a catalog showing what software they had for it.

    After glad-handing me and assuring me that, yes, indeed, Radio Shack was backing UNIX to the hilt, they showed me their UNIX system.

    Yes, they did have one.

    It was a PC running XENIX. It was not turned on. They would not turn it on for me, because the only person who knew how to use it was a consultant who came in one day a week. There were no brochures, no sales material.

    The only software catalog was their general PC software catalog, which had about 32 densely packed pages of (mostly) DOS-based software, several pages of Windows-based packages, and finally about four column-inches of UNIX offerings, most of which were UNIX itself. There were, I think, one or two Accounts Receivables packages and so forth.

    It wasn't exactly untrue that Radio Shack was selling UNIX, but it certainly didn't mean what people thought it meant.

  226. $299! $299 $299! by Animats · · Score: 2
    It's only $299! (Monitor and keyboard extra.) In the Wal-Mart world, that means a lot.

    Lots of kids are going to be doing their homework on those boxes. This is Microsoft's greatest fear - OS price competition at retail.

  227. next version of Office, next version of Lindows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If there is demand to run the next version of Office, maybe the next version of Lindows will make that possible.

  228. Wal-Mart and its quality of products by spunkykuma · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now Wal-Mart has everything on selling crappy products, they even have Lindows on cheaply built PCs now!

  229. thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i was waiting for that.

    perhaps you could fill in for the slashdot editors. your time doesnt appear to be worth much.

    1. Re:thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the slashdot editors are a lot better than he was. Example: "rednecks", which should be "rednecks," in order to be grammaticallly correct. That is just one of many errors he so pridefully made when he opted to proof your post for you.

      Props for the post. You have the anatomy of 'tongue in cheek' perfected.

  230. So much for the "Linux Populism" theory by surfimp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's sort of depressing to see just how elitist/bourgeois/classist many of these comments are, especially those concerning these so-called "rednecks" who shop at Wal-Mart. I mean, isn't one of the "great things" about Linux, and GNU in general, the ideal that operating systems, software and information in general "want to be free"? Or that people shouldn't have to pay $100-400+ for a modern operating system? Or that Linux and Open Source software is revolutionary, capable of breaking the grasp that Microsoft holds over the CONSUMER market? So now you have Wal-Mart, a major retailer, offering complete machines with an OS and a number of useful applications at a price that is lower than the MSRP for the full version of Windows XP Pro. And rather than cheering about how this could potentially be a major opportunity for a Linux distribution to make signficant inroads with the CONSUMER market (remember the revolution?), many respondents have sought to portray the people who will purchase these systems as ignorant, foolish, uneducated, and/or intellectually inferior. Wow, what happened to all the populist ideals above?

    1. Re:So much for the "Linux Populism" theory by kirkjobsluder · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Am I only one wondering why the parent post was moderated "flame bait" for pointing out much of the class bigotry present in this thread?

      I mean sure it's easy to dismiss buyers in rural areas as just a bunch of ignorant yokels unable to RTFM or even the description on the box to realize that they are not getting a pre-packaged Windows system with Microsoft Works. I think this is ignoring the fact that cottage industries and agricultural producers are increasingly relying on information technology in order just to survive in the marketplace. This is a sector that is pioneering GIS and GPS applications for agriculture while universities are dicking around with tracking students. There is a huge market out there of farmers and craftspeople who do everything on a shoestring staff (or even solo) and a shoestring budget from finding the cheapest supplier, to tracking inventory, accounting, quality control, marketing, and shipping. This is a group of potential users that strongly values performance, reliability, and value. Perhaps more importantly they are a group of users quite capable of fixing their own problems.

      So certainly, I can see a huge market for not only Linux but also mysql, Apache, and openoffice in the rural areas served by Wal-Mart.

    2. Re:So much for the "Linux Populism" theory by nmos · · Score: 1
      Err. I think the "rednec" thing was a joke. If you took it seriousl you might want to consider getting out more.

      I mean sure it's easy to dismiss buyers in rural areas as just a bunch of ignorant yokels unable to RTFM or even the description on the box to realize that they are not getting a pre-packaged Windows system with Microsoft Works.


      The average computer user doesn't even know what a browser is or that MS Office doesn't come with Windows. That has absolutely nothing to do with being rural though.
    3. Re:So much for the "Linux Populism" theory by Kupek · · Score: 2

      Okay, so it was a classist joke.

    4. Re:So much for the "Linux Populism" theory by Idou · · Score: 1

      This has more to do with /. and human nature in general. I am, personally, elated that Linux is becoming reachable to the masses. However, the event speaks for itself. This does not need my critique at /. Instead, I will be busy informing the masses of this opportunity and thinking of whom I might send one of these systems to as a gift (the perfect linux user gift!).

      This leaves the "elite" to post their complaints about the inevitable mass acceptance of Linux. Windows users post their complaints about being called "stupid." You post your complaint about the Elite`s immature attitude. I post my complaint about your complaining about the complaints. And, all is right with the world.

      --
      Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
  231. No double standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your Maquiladora link was bad. It went to some sort of Stalinist crypto-Sandinista anti-Nicaragua site.

    As for the music, it is Wal-Mart's choice if they don't want to sell bad music. That is not censorship in any way at all.

    "At least the people Microsoft empoly get paid well."

    And the people of Wal-Mart are paid the value of their work. That is how it should be.

  232. Great it is Wal-Mart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I've already sworn off Wal-Mart and Sam's club.
    Just a little bit of research will bring the Wal-Mart horror stories to light"


    I've done the research myself. Makes Wal-Mart look better. Many of their "enemies" are union thugs who want to force walmart workers into unions against their will, and land-nazis who want to keep Wal-Mart out even though the community wants them in.

    The union thugs are actually running political anti-Walmart web sites using money stolen from workers.

    Hope Sam is looking down happily as the company opens hundreds and hundreds more of them!

    1. Re:Great it is Wal-Mart by Archfeld · · Score: 2

      LOL when NIKE closes down a factory as UNSAFE, walmart moves in and slashes prices. They ARE THE WORST hands down as far as american corporations go on human abuse..NO QUESTIONS, try amnesty international for a decent source.

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  233. This will backfire by phpdeb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Remember when Mexico was supposed to switch over to Linux, or something like that, and they screwed it up. Now MS uses this as a reason to not use Open Source Software, it fails implementation. Of course, all software that is poorly implemented will fail, but that's not the software's fault.

    Now that Walmart is selling these Lindows machines I see a similar problem. Joe User buys a computer, but he can't run half the apps his friend can run, like games. He takes the computer back to Walmart, gets his money back and swears the Lindows sucks. So now in his mind Lindows sucks and anything that sounds like Lindows (i.e. Linux) sucks too. After a couple of months Walmart will get tired of giving people their money back and stop selling computers with Lindows installed. Now it's not just a failure on Walmart, but on Lindows which in turn is a failure for Linux and the Open Source community.

    Hence MS now has more fuel for their fud campaigns. I don't see this as a winning situation for Linux or OSS.

    Most Americans shop at Walmart and they will sell a lot of these computers. This really looks bad to me, really bad.

    On the other hand, I don't really care if Linux "beats" MS. I like my Debian whether Joe Shmoe does or not.

    1. Re:This will backfire by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      So now in his mind Lindows sucks and anything that sounds like Lindows (i.e. Windows :) sucks too.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    2. Re:This will backfire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point.

    3. Re:This will backfire by Tony-A · · Score: 2

      Backfire? Nah, not likely. It's a $300 computer not a $3000 computer.
      Microsoft's attempted fud campaigns are more likely to backfire.
      Walmart will sell a lot of these computers. Next year they will sell a lot more. Walmart also sells a lot of calculators. If Walmart is selling a useable product at a reasonable price they should do just fine. Whether it's bare or Lindows or AOLinux or Debian or Redneck Linux isn't going to make a lot of difference.

  234. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  235. Obligatory cluster post by Provocateur · · Score: 2, Funny

    Whut about a be-yow-wulf cluster of them thar machines, Mary-Jo-Jim-Bob?

    Whut? Dang you Billie Bob yew startin to sound like some dot-commie-city-slicker

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  236. Re:Wal-Mart demographic by jonadab · · Score: 2, Informative

    > About the crack about rednecks buying Lindows...what do you think
    > the average demographic of a Wally world online customer is? I'm
    > willing to bet it's not ma and pa kettle in podunk Arkansas.

    College students and suburbanites mostly, I think...

    But the point of the original redneck remark was that people
    who buy computers at Wall-Mart are not tech-savvy users, and
    that's true, as a general rule. Tech-savvy users buy their
    computers from small shops that build them, or they build
    them themselves, or they shop around. In any case they
    usually don't buy the true bargain-basement stuff, because
    they're planning to upgrade components as necessary and keep
    the thing running for several years, or if not it's because
    they can afford a new (nice) computer every year or so.
    These are power users.

    People who buy computers at Wall-Mart are end users.

    These are overgeneralisations, of course, but in general
    they are mostly true. Redneck is not the word I would
    have chosen, but the point made is valid. Think about
    droves of people buying these things who previously
    were not aware that Apple computers don't use Windows
    and had never heard of Linux, much less anything more
    obscure than that, and have no idea that Windows XP
    is based on NT ("huh?") rather than the consumer Windows
    line. Whether that makes them rednecks or just regular
    people in some field other than IT, the point is that
    they're not computer geeks. They're end users.

    End user awareness that there are various operating
    systems to choose from is a good thing.

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  237. Do shop at Wal-Mart or Sams Club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "They force the suppliers they have to produce products off shore to make them cheaper."

    No, they just buy from suppliers that provide the better deal. Even if they are of those evil foreign races, Mr. Pat Buchanan.

    "5 of the 10 richest people are Waltons."

    Good for them. They deserve it.

    "Wal-Mart IS the Evil Empire and are destroying America one Super Center at a time"

    You have them confused with nukes.

    "Don't shop at Wal-Mart of Sam's Club."

    I will even more after reading your rant :)

  238. OK, who's going to be first? by ecarlson · · Score: 1

    Who here is going to be first to buy one and review it for us?

    PS: I love that there is no floppy on the low-end model.

    --
    - Eric, InvisibleRobot.com
  239. What is the lindows license? by ArmorFiend · · Score: 1

    Is it propriatary? Is it GPL? I can't find any info.

  240. So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use cash. Get over it. Everyone's known that if you use a check or credit card the company will do something with the info. It's been this way for decades.

  241. You are so funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "probably move to a real distro."

    Think a little bit. These are not computer geeks buying these $300 PCs. These are people who just want to use this machine as a tool, to get from point A to point B, as opposed to a hot-rod they can drag race on a saturday night.

    These people are going to do just as little as possible to operate these machines. They certainly aren't going to reinstall their OS, because they're NEVER GOING TO KNOW HOW.

    What's going to make this a disaster for linux, is when their kids buys a game, and wants to play it, and can't. Most people don't care about their OS. Unless it can't run their applications. Then they CARE. And they'll do what's necessary to get their apps running, ie. finding someone who can reinstall their computer with an OS that can run their game. You want to tell me what the name of that OS is? C'mon, I know you can.

    Yes! It's Windows.

  242. Reactos is an Nt kernel clone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lindows still lacks an nt compatible kernel.
    An nt kernel actually exists and is called reactos, the only altetnative to microsoft windows. Despite the great appeal of an nt clone, the project has proceded slowly. There is also a possible threat of patents infringements.Too bad, as Reactos+ wine is going to be a windows killer. Any programmer willing to help speed up this project, check the official reactos website:

    http://www.reactos.com

  243. Do the Math guys by RoshanCat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Walmart.com contributes to less than 0.1% of Walmart's 220Billion revenue, of which less than 4% comes from PC sales, of which maybe around 20% comes Microteck PC sales, of which maybe 50% come from OS-less/Lindows sales of which 80% may actually have Linux/Windows

    Doing a quick & dirty math, I get a high end figure of
    220,000 * 0.001 * 0.04 * 0.2 * 0.5 * 0.8

    or 0.7 million dollars in sales or maybe around 1450 PC's. For Linux those maybe huge numbers, but remember their are 600 Million PC's in the world

    Put it another way, Microtek doesn't sell any more number of PC's than an average white-box seller

    Time for reality check & perspective

    Roshan

    1. Re:Do the Math guys by Manitcor · · Score: 2

      Where are you getting these numbers? I'm sure that the 0.1% for Walmart.com is most likely available from their shareholders packet however the other figures being presented with the word maybe makes me think that these numbers are made up.

      Also keep in mind that Wal-Mart also sells PC's in their retail stores so its not just Walmart.COM (the link to Walmart.COM was just to show the pricing I'm sure).

      What would really be interesting is to get solid numbers on Wal-Mart's PC sales across the board with breakdowns based on model and software load. I'm not sure how many people would actually buy a PC from Wal-Mart. Games yes, software yes, but I think when it comes to the major home electronics Wal-Mart most likely lags behind those like Best Buy, Fry's, and CompUSA by far. Of course I don't have any numbers so this is just pure conjecture. We will most likely never see such number because breakdowns like that aren't even available in shareholders reports.

      --
      "Don't mess with him, he taunts the happy fun ball."
    2. Re:Do the Math guys by WNight · · Score: 2

      That's an example of a SWAG. It's like a WAG (Wild Assed Guess) sort of. A WAG would just say "WalMart can't sell more than 1000, maybe 2000 computers online", a SWAG would pick a few numbers, plug them into an equation and "prove it".

  244. No market? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "but it's good to see your system is just as effective at ultimately giving every person access to techology regardless of market-driven restrictions"

    It looks like this is going well within the restrictions of the market. How would it work otherwise?

  245. Re: WalMart isn't destroying America - you are! by King_TJ · · Score: 2

    Seriously, the people spreading around this anti-capitalistic B.S. are the ones really destroying America.

    People do vote with their dollars, and obviously, the majority are voting for large chains like Circuit City, WalMart, McDonalds, and many others. All of these began as a small business-owner's dream. (Or wait, did you think McDonalds just appeared one day with millions of restaurants and billions of dollars in advertising revenue?)

    Now, I'll be the first to say that part of being a "smart shopper", "educated consumer", or whatever term you prefer - is learning to buy from the stores with the best prices AND service. That means when I need something specialized (like computer parts), I'd rather deal with a store that knows computers. Nonetheless, I shop at WalMart for misc. items. (I went there with my wife 2 days ago and we bought a couple of cake pans, some business-casual clothes for her to wear to her new job, and a couple baby items.)

  246. I am a Lindows Insider by GuNgA-DiN · · Score: 1, Informative

    I have been running their latest version of "Sneak Preview X" and all I can say is that this OS is full of bugs and holes! It is based on Debian and Wine. But, there are tons of problems with video, networking, and hardware. The only Windows programs that I have gotten to successfully run is Word and Excel. No other Windows software will even install. (Even though Lindows claims that you can run tons of programmes!). They have been telling the Insiders all along that this product isn't even beta yet (it is just in the "Sneak Preview" phase). Yet, here they turn around and start selling copies to "Cletus the Slack-Jawed Yokel" at Walmart. This is going to be a complete and utter failure for Lindows. And unfortunately, this will be the first impression that many of these people will have of Linux. This may sour them completely.

  247. Reply to your sig by themanfromutopia · · Score: 1

    Every Lp space is an L1 module? Free? Projective? Stably free? Injective?

    1. Re:Reply to your sig by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's either projective or injective, but I'm not completely sure. I forget if it's free or not, and I'm afraid I don't know what "stably free" means.

      If you're wondering: use convolution as outside multiplication.

  248. Not entirely true... by JoshWurzel · · Score: 0

    Some programmers drink Jolt.

  249. Congratulations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are a troll!

  250. MOD PARENT DOWN. POST IS OFFTOPIC. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    know teckst

  251. DuraSell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny you should metion this. I went to the
    store to pick up some cheap (99 cent)batteries, and I fould a few AA batteries whick look
    like Duracells. I didn't bother to check
    the batteries, so I just paid for them and
    went home. Upon closer inspection, the
    batteries were actualy named
    Durasell. They even have a fake "Powercheck"
    battery tester on the skin of the bettery!
    Funny thing is, I compaired one of them to a real
    durecell battery, and they have the same maling address printed on them. The moral of the story
    is *always* check out the product before you buy.

  252. Cheaper is better by GunFodder · · Score: 2

    In my experience I have seen people put up with stuff that is much worse if it is cheaper in any way.

    1. Re:Cheaper is better by neuroticia · · Score: 1

      But they're not seeing any significant price reduction. The price of Walmarts computers is less than others out there, but there are other computers that are even cheaper than that and come with Windows.

      You're also failing to take into consideration the fact that people also are willing to pay more and/or put up with something just because they're familiar with it.

      -Sara

    2. Re:Cheaper is better by JebusIsLord · · Score: 1

      Not at Walmart they aren't, I would argue. Time will tell i suppose.

      --
      Jeremy
  253. Public sales data and response feedback by The+Fun+Guy · · Score: 1

    "Is there any kind of polling or feedback - especially any whos results are public - to see what customers think about this?"

    Sure, see if WalMart still has this deal going in six months. If they keep selling Lindows PCs, then the sales are high enough and customer complaints are low enough to make it worthwhile. If they discontinue the program, then it was vice versa. The proof of the pudding is in the eating, and nothing is more public that a discontinued product line.

    --
    The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain
  254. Walmart disguising Linux as Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Is it me or does Walmart have some crazy fetish for disguising Linux as Windows? First they (poorly) hack the Apache version string to make it appear they're running IIS (on... Unix) then they sell a Windows-like operating system that's actually Linux. Obviously someone has some serious issues to be ironed out.

  255. Re:The next version of MS Office won't run on Lind by glitch! · · Score: 2

    Even if you are right, the next version of MS Office won't run on Lindows anyway.

    You may be right, but it would be very cool if the Microsoft divisions followed the footsteps of IBM. "Don't tell us not to support that other OS! Our customers want X and your OS preference policy is costing us sales!"

    --
    A dingo ate my sig...
  256. Bigots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You bunch of bigoted *ssholes. Did you ever stop to think that your "high and mighty" technological snobbery might be the cause of the lack of widespread adoption you like to yammer on about so much.

    I got into technology to share it with other people, not to fill a personal void of inadequacy that some of you seem to revel in.

  257. this article discusses some of these points by simpl3x · · Score: 2, Informative

    (http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/10.07/Myth.htm l)

    and here is a nice little quote: "Consider a tale of two companies. Wal-Mart is among the most efficient corporations in the world today. In fact, a late-2001 McKinsey Global Institute study of the boom found that "Wal-Mart directly and indirectly caused the bulk of the productivity acceleration" in its category. How? Information technology, for the most part. Wal-Mart uses IT to help it store and transport goods more efficiently. (You'll never find a half-full pallet in a Wal-Mart.) It relies on forecasting tools to ensure that there are never too few or too many employees on the floor at any one time. It encourages suppliers to stock the stores themselves, using an elaborate data interchange system to make sure suppliers know when inventories are running low. And it takes advantage of economies of scale by building stores in a hub-and-spoke pattern around giant distribution centers. As a result, Wal-Mart has become one of the largest companies in the world while earning returns on capital that are the envy of its peers. By contrast, its competitor Kmart has been plagued with stock-outs and is hooked on sales and markdowns."

    1. Re:this article discusses some of these points by Sabalon · · Score: 2

      You'll never find a half-full pallet in a Wal-Mart

      Yeah...but on some items, I find them out of stock more often than best buy - which says a lot.

  258. Cheap cluster? by macemoneta · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Heck, at $299 each, It might be fun to pick a few of these up to play with (or even actually do work).

    --

    Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

  259. RedNeck Linux by Wordman · · Score: 1

    The mind boggles at the concept of a RedNeck focussed Linux distro. Not exactly what the story is talking about, but a freaky idea anyway.

  260. dual boot? by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

    Now that Linux is the *primary* OS on these machines, what would MS say if Walmart were to offer a dual boot option?

  261. Re:Wal-Mart demographic by Sabalon · · Score: 2

    Yeah...tech-savy poeple may build their own, but unless you live in a cave, chances are you know non-tech-savy people.

    And once they find out that you are, they will most likely ask for advice when buying a new computer.

    So in a way, it's in wal-marts best interest to make sure that even the tech-savy people will recommend the Microtel's instead of "Dude...get a dell."

    Then again last time someone asked my opinion, they didn't listen and got yanked. Best Buy salesman actually sold them virus software when they had the same software at home already on their now-very-dead computer.

  262. Oh no... by Eric+Damron · · Score: 1

    "This exciting new OS delivers the stability of UNIX with the ease of Windows and the ability to run most Microsoft programs."

    Maybe I'm wrong here but isn't the claim (which in on the Wal-Mart page was BOLDED) that it runs MOST Microsoft programs is false?

    I haven't tried Lindows but even if it runs the most advanced WINE that statment is in error.

    --
    The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
  263. I'm afraid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that you're probably right.

  264. This will never work by Frobozz0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Lindows/Linux, whatever you want to call it... it will never be a desktop enviroment for more than a sliver of people. Furthermore, any hardware that costs $300 is useless for anything other than Palm-Pilot type tasks.

    They'll sell a mediocre amount of PC's with Lindows, and it will do jack squat for the Linux and/or Linux gaming community. It'll also confuse the consumer, which is an utter moron when it comes to purchasing hardware or software-- especially at a WalMart. What it may do, is force PC makers who sell Windows to rethink their strategy. They're being bullied into selling Windows, and it costs them big bucks.

    Don't get me wrong, here. I like WalMart. I like the idea of a cheap, usable computer. I don't dislike the average person's reasons for buying a computer... but this will utterly fail. Linux is the polar opposite of a beginner's OS.

    --
    "Politicians find new names for institutions which under old names have become odious to the people."
  265. Redneck Rampage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They need to ship each one of these Lindows PCs with this game pre-installed.

  266. A-shirt == wife-beater? by cpeterso · · Score: 1


    What is an A-shirt? Is that the same thing as a wife-beater?

    1. Re:A-shirt == wife-beater? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.tiedyequeen.com/dyes6.html

      sorry their tie dye, but you get the picture. They are those sleeveless men's Athletic Shirts that are more tightly cut. Hmm, Ill bet you can generalize an A shirt to a tank top or wife beater as well I guess, hmm, not sure.

    2. Re:A-shirt == wife-beater? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      looks like a hippified wife-beater to me

  267. here's why. by geekoid · · Score: 2

    Wal-mart will only buy products if they can get them less then other retailers. MS will not give them a price "break".
    Point in fact, walmaert has ahistory of red penciling the compaines they buy there products for, and has made some of them sell to walmart at less then cost to manufacture. That means the manufacturer must find a way to lower there costs, usually be paying there workerer in non-US markets less.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:here's why. by mikefoley · · Score: 2

      their, their

      --
      What's my Karma Mr. Burns? "Excellent"
  268. Are they allowed to call it UNIX? by sheldon · · Score: 2

    UNIX is a trademark of the Open Group.
    http://www.unix-systems.org/

    Lindows isn't registered as having anything to do with UNIX, so why is Wal-Mart advertising it as such?

    Besides I'd think they would get more name recognition using the name Linux.

    But you're right. The minute this system won't install and run Brittany Spears Dance Club Party... it'll get upgraded to Windows XP.

  269. Time for the geeks to step up to the plate. by geekoid · · Score: 2

    This could potential be great, but people who expect it to be exactly like Windows will be confused. If you know somebody who buys one of these, offer your time help them transition.

    If you are in a LUG near a walmart, try to get the local walmart to allow you to post your meeting times so the people will have an avenue to help with the transition.

    This is the only way something Open will get eyeballs. It is are PR and Marketing path. If you want Linux to be a copetitor to MS, then please try to help.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  270. Re: WalMart isn't destroying America - you are! by geekoid · · Score: 2

    "Now, I'll be the first to say that part of being a "smart shopper", "educated consumer", or whatever term you prefer - is learning to buy from the stores with the best prices AND service. "

    even if they use slave labor?
    even if the fire people for saying the word union?
    even if the set people up, then fire them because they said something negative about the store?
    even if it is considred one of the worse places to work for?
    even if there insrance cost the employees almost as much as they make?
    even if the define full time as 24 hours a week so people will take 2 years to become elligible?
    even if they go into a town, charge less for all there products then the local merchants, then close down, leaving people no option but to drive 35 miles to the next city so they can shop at the only store left, walmart?

    Man, I hope that baby you bought close for has more prinicples then you.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  271. I almost bought a couple... by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm in the market for a couple of cheap web-serving boxes, and strongly considered buying these machines. The price is certainly right, they're pre-built (I'm lazy and hate building from scratch), and I'd be certain drivers for Linux would already be available for all the hardware. Hell, they'd already be installed and configured! A little security work, install Apache, and voila! It's not NetBSD, but it'd be workable.

    The only thing that stopped me was that these machines were slightly too low-end for me. The $500 unit with the Athlon XP1800+ would've worked nicely. The main problem is the default hard drive, a 40GB, 5400 RPM clunker. If I'd had the option to upgrade to a faster drive, I'd've grabbed 'em.

  272. Re:OS X: Xerox PARC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice try. Apple traded stock for the PARC stuff.

    "Pirates of Silicon Valley" was a good movie, but that factiod was false.

    (Sorry about the anonymous coward part - I'm in a hurry here. Earl)

  273. No, it's not off topic. by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    Lots of people were willing to boycott Blizzard over their treatment of BnetD, why is not buying a PC at Walmart different?

    People here want to take a stand for the greater good. If Walmart is doing unethical stuff, are you willing to buy their Lindows PC's?

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  274. Is Lindows Open Source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know this a little off topic, but is Lindows Open Source or is it a proprietary OS? From what I gather on their website, the OS isn't free, and there's nothing that indicates that source or binaries are freely avail. WTF?

  275. Laptop by misfit13b · · Score: 1

    I can't wait till WalMart pulls the OS from their laptops lines. That'll be sweet.

  276. Very tempting. by talks_to_birds · · Score: 2
    Right now it's a toss-up between the $399.00 box with a 1.3ghz Duron, 128mb ram (throw in an extra 256mb stick for $60.00), 40gb hdd, onboad ethernet, (throw out the modem..), and speakers,

    or...

    A PS-2 with the Linux kit put on...

    Damn it.

    Decisions, decisions.

    hmm..

    t_t_b

    --
    I'm on PJ's "enemies" list! Are you?
  277. No, it's not Walmart vs. Microsoft... by skirch · · Score: 1

    Uh. Doesn't anyone else see that this has nothing to do with Walmart taking on Microsoft, or Walmart sticking up for the Slashdot linux kiddies. It's not going to convert the unsuspecting rednecks (nice...) to Linux. It's not going to save the world, and I doubt that it will even make too many customers unhappy. It has everything to do with Walmart's bottom line, and that's it.

  278. Yes, except for the fact that No by cybercuzco · · Score: 2
    From the lindows.com faq:



    What Windows® applications will it run? Our goal is to run all Windows® software, however, that's an ambitious objective that will take time to achieve. Soon, LindowsOS users can expect to run a host of popular Windows® software titles. We'll make available a database of known useable applications in the near future. Watch as the list grows and we further enhance our Windows® compatibility features in the coming months. Stay tuned to the developments by joining our mailing list.

    --

  279. Smart by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2

    Wow! Now, instead of paying the microsoft tax, Wall-Mart will pocket it...

  280. So what? Let them buy junk if they want. by gdyas · · Score: 2

    Screw the whackaloons who're too stupid to know what it is they're buying before they buy it.

    Same goes for companies that want to use deception to sell their product.

    The way I see it, both will get exactly what they deserve.

    --

    The only tool you've got against psychosis is experience.

  281. shows Wal-Mart does not bluff by NCamero · · Score: 1

    I believe this is the result of a corporate poker game type situation.

    WM rep: We don't want to pay $49 per copy of XP, we can only pay 25$.
    MS Rep: $49 is the lowest our rates go. All the big distributors pay it. Dell, IBM, Compaq. You don't sell 1/20 the volume of them. You should be glad to get that rate.
    WM rep: Give it to us at $25 or we wont even put on OS on them.
    MS Rep: You can't do that, its illegal.
    WM rep: Not in Europe.

    So Wal-Mart was called and shipped with no OS. The reason they put Lindows on them now is that some people turned them on, called and tried to get help installing Windows/Linux/whatever. They put Lindows on and now the boxes are service by replacement. If they don't boot up correctly they send another. That's it, no other support needed.

  282. If it works, this is a major breakthrough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Walmart is the largest retailer in the entire world, not some ma-and-pa operation run by people with six fingers. According to the Economist (not your typical redneck publication, though perhaps read by more "rednecks" than one might imagine), Walmart has spent the past 20 years revolutionizing retail, largely through IT. They do not make decisions like this lightly. (And if it doesn't work, it will just quietly disappear for a year or two, and then they will try again.)

    Look at the ads: for a 2 Ghz Pentium 4 with 256 RAM and 40 Gb drive, the difference between the Lindows and Windows machines is $200! ($600 vs $800). And this comes with MS-Office installed if I'm reading the product description correctly. Walmart sees open source as a means of reducing the cost of their product by 25%: if it works, they sell many more machines (yes, Walmart is aware of demand elasticity).

    As far as rednecks figuring out Lindows, ever look under the hood of your car? Rednecks can figure out that technology. To say nothing of mastering the technology involved in running methamphetamine labs. Even in a trailer park, there will be someone who can figure out Lindows (assuming the system can be figured out. Though like Windows is totally transparent, right?); that and the price difference should be enough to get these systems into play.

  283. The differences... by Erotomek · · Score: 1

    Hopefully the good differences will be better than the bad differences, but there is a difference.

    I surely hope that the good differences will be better than the bad differences, but what if the bad differences are worse than the good differences? — We're boned then...

    --

    Krótko: kady Erotomek
    W pimiennictwie ma swój domek.

  284. They also carry over 200 Linux books by leighklotz · · Score: 2, Informative
  285. You guys just don't get it. by Pollux · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I just cannot believe that you feel Walmart is doing this to "take a stab at selling Lindows computers." I'll tell you what this is about:

    The almighty dollar.

    Walmart does not care about Linux geeks clutching their little stuffed penguins and waving their "Open Source" flags. They do not care about someone who walks into a store to tell the tech department that they should sell machines with Linux on it. They care about money. They have always cared about money, and they always will care about money. They are the most efficient corporation in the whole world, and they are efficient because it makes money. Anyone who thinks that Walmart's #1 priority is not about money needs to take some courses in Economics, wake up, and smell the capitalism.

    I've been working in the backstock rooms of Walmarts for three years now, and I've overheard the managers on quite a few occasions. Walmart demands cheap prices from their distributors. They're the #1 retailer in the US, so they have the power to do so. They lure distributors into their system by offering to sell thier product, then stab them in the back a year or two later and demand the product be cheaper, or they'll find someone else. This leads product manufacturers to use overseas labor and/or lower the quality of the product, all to stay buddies with Walmart. When you see the adds of Walmart lowering their prices, they can do so because its not their company that takes a hit in profits...it's the manufacturers that do.

    I'm sure Walmart did the same thing with this Microtel company when they asked for computers. When Microtel was put under the gun to make a cheaper computer, I'm sure they cut every single corner. Just look at it from a $$$ perspective..."Hey Walmart, we got this OS that looks like Windows, runs like Windows, and can run %90 of Windows software, but we can put it on every machine for absolutely no charge!"...Walmart will say yes, because they now have a "Windows-ish" computer that sells for $100 less than the competition.

    And for those of you who say that there might be a high-return rate? Walmart doesn't care. If people return their computers, all Walmart has to do is box it up and ship it back to Microtel. The only loss that they take is paying some 16-year old $2 to take the time to box it back up and stick it on a pallet. It's certainly worth their time, considering that these computers are %10-%20 cheaper than the competition. If it fails, Walmart returns the computers, Walmart dumps Microtel and finds another manufacturer, and Microtel goes belly-up, and Walmart leaves unscathed. If it's a success, Walmart gets the credit.

    Wake up and smell the dollar bills.

    1. Re:You guys just don't get it. by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Since you're on the spot, a question: the WalMart here has a ZERO RETURNS policy on "electronics" (which means anything that is stocked in the computer/TV/Stereostuff section), even if it's DOA. I realise this is counter to *posted* policy, but that's how it is at this store. (I know about this because I was going to buy a nicely-discounted USR modem, but happened to ask the store manager about the return policy first, and as a result wound up going across the street and buying the same modem at Staples.)

      Anyway, my question is.. what is WalMart's real policy about such stuff? how will local interpretations (such as the above) be handled?

      As to the target market, I'm sure you're right -- see my post above where I speculate that WalMart is aiming at the eMachines market (which is a helluva lot more significant in total dollars spent than the gaming market).

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  286. Linux and the consumer win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's too bad that Microsoft's monopoly is so taken for granted that normal old fashioned competition even merits a story. Competition is how the free market is supposed to work. I wonder why so many fat, rich Republicans are against a free market. They are against competition and the consumer. The irony is that the Republicans believe in corporate socialism at the expense of the individual.

  287. Rage against my ass by black88 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, quoting wealthy commie rock stars!!

    Fuck RATM!!

    Fuck Communism!!

    Power to me

  288. Re:The next version of MS Office won't run on Lind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    haha, you seem to think they aern't intrested in entrenching thier monopoly further.

    Unfortunatly they seem to have this problem, even though they have already been found guilty, they are going to probably get away clean as a whistle.

  289. Bikers Use Linux! by Lethyos · · Score: 3, Funny

    According to this story, it is indeed true that a large motorcycle gang uses Linux, and is infact willing to beat people up to protect Linux developers. From the story:

    "I was running from the gun nuts and the police, and was running down the middle of the street in a panic. I thought it couldn't possibly get worse. I look up and it's a freakin million bikers wearing gang colors, coming right at me. The guy asks me why I'm runnin' and I tell him that they're trying to kill us because we're into Linux. This dude, the meanest, most evil-looking dude I ever saw in my life looks at me and says 'sheeeit, Linux? I run Red Hat on my linux box" and nods to the dude next to him. Turns out that the chief enforcer for the gang had met Linus Torvalds at Sturgis way back years ago. Linus turned him on to Red Hat, and he's been writing GNU software ever since."

    --
    Why bother.
  290. Elitist snobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, the largest retail chain in the world selling PCs with Linux (sorta) preinstalled? You'd think that'd be cause for celebration, right? Not at Slashdot. Instead, it's cause for derision and jokes about Deer Hunter. And you people wonder why Linux is percieved as a toy for l337 15-year-olds by many computer users. All you snobby children who think you're Billy Badass because you burned a Red Hat ISO 6 months ago, please go find something else to fuel your imagined sense of superiority. We don't want you.

  291. I really don't get it... by Steveftoth · · Score: 2

    why every thinks that Office is the best suite.
    I mean why? Why is that true, I think we are all brainwashed to think that. I really don't think that it's the best, just that there is no alternitive people are willing to use. Mostly because of the file format thing.

    1. Re:I really don't get it... by Telastyn · · Score: 1

      My main problem with OpenOffice (besides it's general incompatabilities with MSOffice) is it's braindead handling of color schemes. Not to mention being terribly slower than MSOffice (which is slow in its own right)

  292. Only those who know will buy... by muck1969 · · Score: 1
    The Lindows PC's are not sold in stores but on-line which means that only ppl who have a PC, using it to connect, and clicking through to get to the Lindows area are most likely people like ... oh let's say PC geeks ... looking for cheap PC's (to use as dust collectors, LEGO projects, furniture, etc.).

    This is really tempting cuz I really want my own Beowulf Cluster of these puppies! <pain>moan</pain>

    Isn't it true that most /.'ers have a pet project that requires a disposable PC?

    --
    m.mmm..myyy ... sssissxxxtthh bbboottle offf mmmmmoouunnnttain ddeeewww.. in thhe pppassst ffffif
  293. Going for the generic crowd by indole · · Score: 2
    Do you guys really think the walmart execs are so familiar with the free software movement that they're trying to support a non-windows OS for ethical reasons?
    Lowly Employee 1: Sir, we can save money if we use this generic software instead of buying licenses from Microsoft...

    Fat Cigar Smoking Exec: Money is fantastic!

    Lowly Employee: Well this Red Hat Linux looks pretty strong and has both large user base and solid support. We also have this beta OS that can use a couple of windows applications if users dont mind absurdly complex configurations and constant failing of programs... its called Lindows...

    Fat Cigar Smoking Exec: Lindows sounds like Windows!

    Lowly Employee: Ah... yes sir, it does...
    --
    (2,3-Benzopyrrole)
  294. Security? by John+Hasler · · Score: 2

    Is Lindows still telling users to always log in as root and use no password?

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  295. Making a good impression.. by Chicane-UK · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Guess it depends on what you want to do on your PC.. but I can't see Lindows making as good an impression as the 'real mcoy' would make.

    This isn't a kick at Lindows - I haven't tried it out yet, but I do really want to - and I really admire that they have had the guts to have a go at a project like this..

    Its just that for the average 'redneck user', Lindows just wont be Windows. You wont be able to play all your games, and you wont be able to run all your apps.. I wish it was possible to have perfect cross compatability but hey-ho..

    It'll be interesting to see what happens though..

    --
    "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
  296. Stupid moderation AGAIN! by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    Okay, so my response to the flamebait challenge here was modded down as redundant. Whoever modded me down apparently didn't see that other people, though they don't feel the same way I do about Walmart, disagreed with the moderation.

    Let me explain something to you moderators who modded me down: Just because my opinion goes against the general flow, doesn't mean that it is flamebait or that I'm being a troll. It's called 'disagreeing'. I'm not sure where you guys are from, but in the USA it's perfectly okay to disagree on matters, even if the topic is controversial. Flamebait is when you say something intended to draw harsh replies. In my case, though it could have drawn flames, but it didn't. The fact that people responded kindly to it indicates that I am correct.

    Here's an example of flamebait: "Linux sucks. Windows 2000 is so much better!"

    Here's an example if disagreement: "I prefer Windows 2000 over Linux because I can do this, this, and that."

    The difference is not that subtle. If you can reasonbly back up your points, like I did in my original post, then you're not trolling or creating flame bait.

    As for being redundant: I don't see how this post could be considered redundant. That's definitely one of the wierder moderations I've had recently. This moderation was pretty retarded. Again, I'll point out that other people in this thread have expressed that the original moderation was bad. So what happens? My post challenging it is redundant.

    *Sigh* Oh well, I doubt the moderator will look back at this post and give me some sort of explanation. Worse, I doubt I'll accept his answer. For the most part, moderations of my posts are pretty decent. This time, it was just lame.

    This isn't about karma. This is about fairness.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  297. Flamebait mod is FUCKING RETARDED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To the moderator who modded down the start of this thread as flamebait, I have to say this:

    FUCK YOU idiot.

    THere, now you have some flame bait.

    Why don't you go do some real moderation instead of modding a guy down who's making an interesting point. It's people like you who make people link to goatse.cx.

  298. Oh, c'mon... by MegaFur · · Score: 1

    With all due respect, wtf are you talking about? Okay, I could see maybe, if a bunch of Lindows machines got compromised, M$ might try to run a (small) FUD campaign on it, but other than that...

    It's not like there's any way that these Lindows boxes could be any *less* secure than standard Windows, right? In addition, as long as the Lindows machines are significantly in the minority (and even if the program is highly successful, they will be in the minority for a long time), it will be easier for all the virii/worm writers to keep on targetting Windows like normal.

    --
    Furry cows moo and decompress.
  299. Average consumera and Lindows by hendridm · · Score: 2

    For the price they want for the final version ($99 I believe), I wonder how this is going to fair with consumers. I mean, I see Lindows on the shelf for $99 and the Windows XP Upgrade for $99 which one are they going to choose?

    Let's see, I can get 100% compatibility and the exact interface I'm used to for $99. Or, I can get something that is "close enough" for $99.

    Me thinks the average consumer is going to go with the brand name they trust. Too bad it's Microsoft.

    1. Re:Average consumera and Lindows by daveman_1 · · Score: 1

      ... and the exact interface I'm used to for $99.

      I'm not seeing it. The interface in XP is so radically different than any other windows OS, it might as well be something entirely new. Kind of like mac os X, only on shittier hardware.

      --
      Russian Russian Russian RussianDollSig DollSig DollSig DollSig
    2. Re:Average consumera and Lindows by hendridm · · Score: 2

      Hmmm, you make a point, but I believe the rest of my argument still stands.

      Off-topic, but I think Mac hardware is excellent. It's the operating system that is shit (even OS X - it has a great core but features an anti-productive GUI). I think Windows has a very productive GUI but has other problems associated with Microsoft. *sigh* No perfect OS I suppose.

      I am very excited for LindowsOS, but at $99, I'm wondering if it is doomed to fail...

  300. I'm a Windows user who just tried Linux... by plasticquart · · Score: 1

    My short tale of wonder and journey...

    I'm trying to setup an e-commerce site (shopping cart, cheap (er, inexpensive hosting), simple website, etc), and have been looking for a free or VERY cheap shopping cart/e-commerce/credit card processing service.

    And then I stumbled upon Redhat Interchange (http://interchange.redhat.com/). Now, don't get me wrong, I'm not a complete idiot on a computer. I've built systems from scratch. Installed countless version of Windows... and I even know what the BIOS is... but after downloading and installing Redhat 7.3 onto a spare P3 system (which installed quite nicely, I must admit (even had internet access)) I was completely unable to traverse the cryptic install/users guides that are available for Interchange.

    Granted, Interchange doesn't look to be geared towards Joe-Average-Computer-User... but the documentation for installation just doesn't cut it at all. As I would think I'm their intended audience... ie, someone that knows a computer, wants to get into e-commerce, etc.

    Here is an impression of the Redhat Interchange install documentation: "1. Install. 2. Configure as needed. 3. Make Money!!!"

    The average (or above average, in my case) user who is new to Linux will have no idea how to configure this in a meaningful manner. And that is a shame.

    From the looks of it, I'm think I'll end up using Miva Merchant (http://www.miva.com/products/merchant/)... but my goal of a completely non-proprietary software/inexpensive site will not happen.

    Linux is nowhere near ready for general consumer usage, period. Hell, the average user of a Windows PC has no idea what the "Control Panel" is... let alone what "eth0" has to do with surfing the internet.

    But, then again, perhaps I'm overestimating my computer acumen.

    1. Re:I'm a Windows user who just tried Linux... by nmos · · Score: 1
      But, then again, perhaps I'm overestimating my computer acumen.


      No, you're just overestimating the average user's need to set up an e-commerce site.

      You've spent years and years learning the M$ way of doing things so you can't expect to just jump in and be an expert. That's like an English teacher complaining that Spanish sucks just because they can't start speaking it perfectly on the very first day.
  301. Lindows and WalMart (potential) by gessleX · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All things have a potential for good or bad. Simply put.

    If there is to be the software revolution for the consumer, the consumer is going to have to be the one to make the choice and must have the option readily available.

    Desktop pre-installs of Lindows is doing just that. It is putting an alternative in front of the economic power base that must make the choice of acception or rejection.

    Despite what it seems, marketing and product sales
    is the one field that is controlled by the common person and not the high level wealth. Why else would you have millions paid for Nascar or motorbike sponsorships? Bus panels for public transit?

    Potential harm to Linux on the whole? Limite in my views. As far as I understand, Lindows is being advertised not as Microsoft Windows or as a Linux distribution, but as a growing bridge between them.

    This could very well be a wake up call to software manufacturers. Or it could very well be another software tombstone. Risk.

    I have yet to try Lindows. But I would not that there would be proprietary workarounds for some of X's quirks.

    Let's just see. Hey, after all, MSDOS and Windows
    were built off of someone else's work. Look what we have now :).

  302. no floppy drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    did every failure to miss the "no floppy drive included" along with a monitor, theres also no AGP slot. Looks like they didnt even use the crappy ecs motherboards that are dirt cheap....

    Im still wonder why they couldnt fork over another dollar for a floppy drive

  303. Rednecks drinking wine? by Goonie · · Score: 2

    Wherever you live, you must have a better class of redneck. Here it's GutRot Lager, or premix rocketfuel and Coke.

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  304. um, they wouldnt buy this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if they were going to install a pirated XP, they sell pC's with no operating system as well

  305. well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    than whats whos windows for?

    I have you seen the clowns on techtv lately?
    they almost make rednecks look good.

  306. Ill say what I want. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So fuck off. free country. go to france if you hate this concept.

    1. Re:Ill say what I want. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's France got to do with it? Moron.

  307. Business Model? by verbs_an_action_word · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.lindows.com/lindows_products_categories . hp Looks like they are planning to make a profit by subscription service. "All products free to Click-N-Run Wharehouse Members" Most new users to linux won't bother learning the traditional "configure-make-install" routine and I think the plan to take advantage of this.

  308. Windows by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 1

    BeOS is being rebron as Bindows
    OS2 Warp as O'Windows
    Windows as Winux
    MacOS as Mac & Cheese
    UNIX as Wunixos
    Palm OS as Pindows

    Windows fo bindows me manna fo fanna Windowssss....
    ;-P

    PS The artist formerly known as Prince is changing his name to /.

    I have no sig

  309. I just read this entire fucking discussion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and I can tell you sir, it was a waste of my time!

    Now excuse me while I kiss the sky.

  310. Something to send email. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too many folks have gone to Walmart and purchased an XP machine for $800.00 (and had trouble with it) when all they want to do is connect to the internet, and send and receive e-mail, often to family members that are in another State, Town, Country, etc. Walmart has one of these microtel machines for $299.00. They better have tested it to see if it will surf and send email easily, and then they have a winner. Many of the machines are much more expensive than that, but these folks just want a new machine that does not require a lot of computer savy on their part to get it going. If they don't like lindows, they can get their serviceman to put Mandrake on it, or Redhat. Then Mozilla or Netscape communicator will handle the surfing and email just fine.

  311. Lindows runs AOL 7 by nutznboltz · · Score: 2, Informative

    According to an artcle on NewsForge AOL runs on Wine 2.0.

    Here is a screen shot with an AOL icon

    Running AOL wins most of the user acceptance battle.

  312. Re:The next version of MS Office won't run on Lind by unitron · · Score: 2
    So even if Windows gets killed deader than dead, MS Office and whatever keeps Microsoft alive, well, and wealthy?

    There just ain't no justice.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  313. I'll support 'em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I moved upstate NY, the middle of nowhere, when I got laid off from my post-internet, supposedly 'safer' *nix sysadmin job. I had bought 19 acres of farmland up here before the internet bubble burst, and I've been racking my brain trying to figure out how to stay up here full-time and still make a living. I'd love to not have to move to find a job. There's a Wal*Mart ten miles away, and I'd be happy to support their customers who need help! Where do I learn more about Lindows? (Thanks ./, btw, I had no idea about Lindows before reading this, even though I was in Wal*Mart two days ago.)

    Get out to the country a bit more, guys. You might like the fresh air. Like any other group of people I've met, rednecks are fine unless they're drunks.

  314. Likely not relevant to the intended market by Reziac · · Score: 2

    Actually, I suspect Walmart is going after the eMachines market, which was not aimed at gamers, but at middle-aged non-geeks who use a computer in a home-based business or for simple email and documents, or who may buy a second cheap computer for their kids' homework and chat habits. IOW it was not designed or sold as a gaming platform, but as an everyday usin' machine.

    So I don't think games per se enter into it.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  315. Re:OS X: Xerox PARC by Banjonardo · · Score: 1

    And I guess Xerox PARC were real innovators when they stol their UI from Douglas Englebart.

    --

    -----

    Score 3? For what? Being wrong, at length? - smirkleton

  316. emma goldman rocks! by rsklnkv · · Score: 1

    and lets not forget the fact that most of us have been raised into a society of burger-eating, hollywood-lovin, chris columbus-was-a- god, pathetic excuse for a world. Ever try to find out what goes into actually producing that burger? if you do, you most likely won't eat fast food again.
    shopping at wal-mart for lindows is just a small piece of the pie.
    I like you commieoeverlord. you dig anarchism or what?

    --
    _____ "If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear." -- Orwell
    1. Re:emma goldman rocks! by CommieOverlord · · Score: 1

      Considering that I am pro-communist I don't see how I can be anarchist. The ultimate realization of anarchism is a completely unregulated free-market (ie capitalist) economy. Think about that the next you are out on a idiotic protest.

  317. Considering Walmart's History... by NeuroManson · · Score: 2

    Every competitor they've faced down, including the once mighty Kmart, has been summarily wiped from the planet... Since they're marketing Lindows systems, which makes Microsoft their chief competitor, does that mean they'll take out MS next? Would seem incredibly ironic, considering both companies have shown dubious and questionable business practices...

    So when that next war comes down, will /.ers be praising Microsoft, or Walmart?

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    1. Re:Considering Walmart's History... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it comes down to what each individual poster wants...

      M$ or Wal*Mart

      my preference is redNECKS over redMOND

  318. screenchafers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Megan has massive thighs. That is hot.

  319. This is so true. by Idou · · Score: 1

    A coworker of mine was saying how there was some kind of computer prize give away. When the prize winner was asked if she already had a computer she said yes, more than one . . . BUT, that her husband had installed Linux on all of them, BUT this computer was going to be HERS!!

    What can I say . . . you gotta take the time to explain things to your family members (though, don't waste time with your parents . . . they won't believe it until it is on their favorite TV program . . . sad, ain`t it).

    This is really the cruelty of MS, and its ilk. Fine, charge a lot for your OS because you can, distribute viruses, I will just quietly observing your misdeeds on my Linux box. However, BRAINWASHING my family members into thinking they are too stupid to use anything different IS NOT OKAY.

    Being the most computer competent family member in my family, I strive to share the information technology revolution with my other family members. However, I am constantly having to speak over the FUD background noise that MS appears to constantly emit. I feel like I am trying teach my niece math while constantly having someone stand behind her whispering "MATH!? Forget MATH! Math is too hard and user unfriendly!! What you need is a husband! What YOU should be doing is practicing make-up!."

    This is why MS must die.

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
  320. hear, hear by ted_nugent · · Score: 1

    The last story on these machines over at Newsforge was full of atta-boy posts for Walmart/Microtel. Lots of folks were pledging to put their money where their mouth is and getting a preloaded Linux machine from a major retailer.

    These posts are nothing but really unfunny comments from stupid has-been tv stars and the frat boys who love them.

    --

    Free the West Memphis Three!

  321. Linux crowd . . . by Idou · · Score: 1

    I think you have answered your own question.

    Linux is a community, MS is a company. Not using the OS just because the community seems inconsistent, rude, snobby . . . is just a funny misstep in logic.

    Let's say you LOVE U2. So, one day, you go to a U2 concert. You see a large crowd of U2 fans, and you cry out "I Love U2." This is a very simple communication to the community as a whole and, if you apply similar expectations that you are making on the "Linux crowd," then you would expect positive, clear feedback. Unfortunately, COMMUNITIES do not work this away. Some U2 fans might cheer you on, while others migh ignore you, while, still, others migh come over and beat your @ss for sounding gay (dumber things are known to have happened). The result is inconsistent, so you now decide you hate U2 (even though your experience has NOTHING to do with U2).

    My point is, most of your Linux community communications will tend to be even more complex that "I love Linux." Therefore, you should expect even more chaotic reponses from different individuals in the community.

    How about this . . . Assume that you are white. You have one black friend who constantly complains about being discriminated against. You have another black friend who constantly says that black people should not get special treatment for being black. Do you conclude that the black community is irrational!? Or do you conclude that "black" is not a legitimate factor in making assumptions about one`s views. Okay, now imagine that that friend was a Linux User.

    Look at it this way . . . Linux is so inclusive that not only kind, carrying, nobel prize winner's use it, but also mean, cruel, dog kicking jerks use it as well. If you are going to use it, use it for your own reasons and stop trying to grasp what kind of "image" it will give you by observing other community members. Linux is not about image, it is about socio-economic progression (but if you don't like that explanation, there are a million other . . . pick one).

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
  322. -1, Offtopic - you stupid bastard by Sean+Clifford · · Score: 2
    I don't think that many people really understand what Offtopic really is anyway. In a discussion, it's normal for it to weave and touch on different subjects, even to take off entirely into a different tangent. And while yes, a thread that branches off from the main topic of a discussion may be off-topic, it's not off-topic within that thread.

    And you're right that there's often good stuff of value within that thread, tangentially related if at all. I'm going to give your suggestion a shot.

    People who have a background in newsgroups seem to readily understand this distinction. Others don't. I was replying to a direct question and got tagged for it. That's really no big deal, though, because I've been moderated up for crap I didn't think was particularly insightful or interesting.

    What a high Karma score really means is that people that what you've got to say is more important than background noise. However, as an earlier posted pointed out, it's a long hard struggle to rise above the noise in the first place (to get automagic score of 2) so people notice you, then the trip to 50 territory comes quickly.

    Don't get me wrong, I think having some kind of moderation system is better than having dick. This one is far superior to anything else I've encountered (or can think of). No, it's not perfect, but it's not meant to be.

    Oh, and off-topic to this thread, I'm gonna take a look at the Lindows PC offerings in my local Wal-Mart this afternoon. I'm glad to see that someone's willing to experiment (even if it is Wal-Mart), but I think it's doomed to fail because Wal-Mart isn't where you should go to buy computers - well, or anything else for that matter.

  323. comp sci? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    god if youre a comp sci major we are in fucking trouble. looks like I have had less trouble than you on linux , and I used to have trouble making a dual boot win 98/NT machine. jeez..

  324. Re: WalMart isn't destroying America - you are! by King_TJ · · Score: 2

    Ok, let's break down your accusations and take a closer look at them.

    Slave labor? How do you define this one? Slavery hasn't existed in the U.S. for over 100 years, in the form most commonly recognized. I assume you're referring to WalMart hiring illegal immigrants? That happens everywhere, and really - I believe larger chains simply get caught more often, having so many stores and employees total. I know of several "mom and pop" restaurants in town that hire illegal aliens and pay them below minimum wage too. Lots of people consider these establishments to be "upper class" places for fine dining, too.

    Fired for merely saying "Union"? Fired for saying negative things about the store? Guess what? Most states in the U.S. support "at will" employment. Unless you can show discrimination based on age, sex, race, or religion - you can quite legally and easily be fired for *any* other reason. I can be fired just because my boss doesn't like my car, my hairstyle, even on the first day of work - before I get a chance to work even 1 minute. Check with a lawyer specializing in "wrongful termination" if you don't believe me.

    It may well be considered "one of the worst places to work" - but they sure do have lots of employees despite that. I'm betting WalMart *never* held a gun to anyone's head and forced them to apply for a position there. In fact, my wife used to work at WalMart for a while. She actually said it was a good experience, other than one manager that started long after she was already employed - who started giving her a hard time. (She asked the previous manager if she could have the Xmas holdiday off, well in advance, and he agreed. The new manager didn't... so she quit.)

    Insurance should always be optional. An employer can't force you to buy their insurance plan. If it's a bad deal, just look into other options. (The insurance plan where I worked really sucked big ones. Several people opted out and bought their own personal plan that worked out better for their particular situation.)

    Moving into a town and undercutting the competition happens all the time, too. It's bound to happen eventually, if everyone else charges more than the items really cost to obtain. I don't fault WalMart for being competitive. If you're a small business going up against a giant like WalMart, you need to do your research and *compete*. If you can't beat their pricing, fine - beat them in other areas. Maybe offer real low-priced home delivery of household goods and groceries. Maybe offer vastly superior customer service, so people don't want to shop at WalMart. Maybe offer extended hours. Lots of WalMart shoppers only go there because everything else is closed for the night!

  325. Wait... by User+956 · · Score: 1

    If you buy one of these, then your computer will be susceptible on two fronts to that Linux/Windows cross-platform virus. Yet another reason why Lindows is a bad idea...

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
  326. Re:OS X: Xerox PARC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple PAID Xerox.

    There were also many things that Apple put into their system that were not in the Xerox system. Things you take for granted like "when you move an overlapping window, the exposed areas of the windows underneath get repainted."

  327. Time to die, Wesley. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A character in Diablo 2 said it best:

    Die. Die. Time to die. Die. Time to die. Time to die. Die. Time to die. Die. Die. Time to die. Time to die. Die. Thank you. Thanks.

    Rednecks don't like computerz. Ass.

  328. Motherboard Specs for $299 PC by Milican · · Score: 2
    I e-mailed Microtel Computer Systems and asked them what their hardware specs were for their SYSMAR701 PC With 850 MHz Duron. I got a response back on 6/17/2002. Anyway, the motherboard for the $299 PC is the MSI MS-6378X-L (MS-6378 V.3). A quick rundown of major specs is shown below:
    • 200/266MHz FSB, Supports AMD Duron/Athlon/Athlon XP up to 2000+
    • Ultra DMA 66/100, 2 PC100/133 DIMM Sockets up to 1GB
    • Integrated Trident Blade3D AGP Graphics Engine shared memory up to 8MB
    • Micro-ATX Form Factor, 3 PCI, 1 CNR, AC 97, 2 USB, AGP 2x
    • ADMTek AN983B 10/100 BaseT Ethernet

    Also, I should note the motherboard used changes based on model. Not bad for a $299 PC with Linux!

    JOhn

    P.S. Big thanks to Rich at Microtel for the quick repsonse :)
  329. Wal-mart re-words ad by nutznboltz · · Score: 1

    Seems they have changed the wording of their ad a bit over time. It
    no longer makes any claims about lindows ability to run windows apps.
    There was an older ad which said lindows was a unix and could run most
    windows apps but it cannot be accessed from the search engine built
    into the walmart.com site. You only get this:

    Microtel PCs with LindowsOS
    The low cost alternative to computers preloaded with Microsoft
    Windows. These PCs ship with an exciting new Linux based Operating
    System (OS) named Lindows. This exciting new OS delivers the stability
    of Linux with the ease of Windows and they include a trial membership
    to a library of over 1,000 software programs so they can be outfitted
    for any purpose whether business, home, or entertainment.

  330. Types, Stereowise by fm6 · · Score: 2
    Frankly, the usage of "redneck" in this case is classically racist! The author has no knowledge whatsoever of the individuals purchasing these computers, and is making broad generalizations as to what types of people shop at Walmart. (I suppose the "niggers" shop at K-Mart, eh?)
    You make a very, very good point, and this needs further emphasis. There's a lot more to social tolerance than simply avoiding certain words. This is revealed when people avoid saying "nigger", "kike", "spic", and other such expressions, but think nothing of labeling working-class whites as "rednecks". You have to suspect that people who do this are honoring the forms of tolerance, but still find it convenient to think in terms of stereotypes.

    I admit you can't totally avoid this -- it's only human to break things down into categories. But it is simply lazy and bigoted to stick with an arrogant, prejudicial set of categories against all evidence, and to deny the many various humans you will meet in life the simple right to be individual people.