Slashdot Mirror


Junkie Loves His Spam

VicPylon writes "Here is the reason we have to spend time and money on spam filters. This character actually responds to and buys from spam. I wonder if he is aware that he is supporting digital pollution?" I guess this proves that there really is something for everyone online.

667 comments

  1. Whats his email? by brejc8 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Interesting they didn't give out his email address.

    1. Re:Whats his email? by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Funny
      Interesting they didn't give out his email address.

      Hey, the guy only makes 40K a year and lives in Manhattan, he can only afford to send so many dollars to "Happy Guy"

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Whats his email? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Happy Dude, dude.
      I think I'd be happier with the dollar.

    3. Re:Whats his email? by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 5, Funny

      Of course not. He doesn't want to be spammed with real messages. He's probably even got an E-mail filter that removes everything but spam.

    4. Re:Whats his email? by Archwyrm · · Score: 2, Funny

      If only they had given his email address. Then I could send him a message thanking him for supporting something that makes even having an email address a pain in the neck. I remember the days when you could give out your email address on the web (like on your own website!) and you would only get meaningful email. *sigh*

      --
      Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power. -- Mussolini
    5. Re:Whats his email? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps this is a good place to start:
      Anywho.com

    6. Re:Whats his email? by gewalker · · Score: 3, Funny

      I would be glad to send him my spam. I sure don't need or want it.

    7. Re:Whats his email? by ssbljk · · Score: 1
      --
      /ss
    8. Re:Whats his email? by jorlando · · Score: 3, Funny

      how insensitive of you!

      If I had that good man email I could offer him a very special deal in nigeria, where he could get rich just trasfering some financial funds for the family of the late dictator mobutu sese seko that will be used to build an airport to take refugee kids from an orphanage in serbia... or something like this...

    9. Re:Whats his email? by c1ay · · Score: 2, Funny
      Interesting they didn't give out his email address.

      Yeah, I was kinda disappointed too. I guess I'll just have to /. Darl's email again. Why don't you all write Darl and ask him if he likes spam as much as Mr.Soto.

      --

    10. Re:Whats his email? by nycsubway · · Score: 1, Funny

      I get about 30 junk mails a day that I would love to send him.

      Seriously, maybe these junk mail companies could send their crap to just HIM and the other nuts like him?

    11. Re:Whats his email? by ScottSpeaks! · · Score: 4, Informative
      sales@dduo.com will probably get to him.

      Check out his web site at that domain. He's aI guess The Wall Street Urinal doesn't do research when the interview subject presents himself as a poster boy for the Holy Church of Mercantilism.

    12. Re:Whats his email? by Psmylie · · Score: 5, Funny

      I remember the days when you could give out your email address on the web (like on your own website!) and you would only get meaningful email

      Yeah, that was a good week.

      --

      psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo

    13. Re:Whats his email? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Yeah...but, I'd be happy to set a rule to forward all my spam to him...instead of /dev/null where it all goes now...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    14. Re:Whats his email? by bhtooefr · · Score: 5, Informative

      RTFA. He treats spam as a store that comes to you in your inbox, and sells some stuff online (via a semi-legit site, and spam). He's not just a spam-victim, he's a spammer, too. He even said he ran a couple of porn sites and squatted a few domain names.

    15. Re:Whats his email? by cynicalmoose · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I once set that up using my own e-mail system - duplicate all the messages and try to filter out all the spam. Theoretically it shouldn't make a difference, but I couldn't ever get the accuracy above 85%. I reckon that this is actually more difficult - spam has a really limited vocabulary - viagra, porn, mortgage, refinance, pharmaceutical - but my real e-mail has fewer "killer" words (though any of MUN, c++, bio, flightgear should ensure safe passage!)

      --
      Exercise your right not to vote. thinkoutside.org
    16. Re:Whats his email? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      osoto52493@aol.com

      Hope it's the right guy, coz I reckon that 150 spams a day might be going up real soon.

    17. Re:Whats his email? by Scaba · · Score: 2, Informative

      You should forward all of your spam to uce@ftc.gov.

    18. Re:Whats his email? by leifm · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I didn't think you could live in Manhattan on 40k, let alone have money left over for Spam offers.

      --

      "Windows Me offers tremendous reliability and stability improvements..." -- Paul Thurott
    19. Re:Whats his email? by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Informative
      I didn't think you could live in Manhattan on 40k, let alone have money left over for Spam offers.

      My guess is, like many property managers, his residence is provided (as long as he works for his employer) and living in Manhattan you've got to have more money that that to keep a car, so he and his wife probably use the subways and buses for transport. Take away housing and transportation and you find you don't really need to make a lot to live comfortably on.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    20. Re:Whats his email? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I think this really says all there is to say about this loser:

      "45-year-old grandfather"

      I mean, jesus... great judgement that guy has, huh?

    21. Re:Whats his email? by RLW · · Score: 4, Funny

      He can either spend his money on spam pitches or he can get mugged. I bet the muggers get pretty peeved though when they demand cash and all he has to offer is vitamins, penis enlargement pills and blurbs about time shares.

      After Federal income tax, State income tax, City income tax and sales tax, most of that 40k got mugged by his elected officials anyway.

      In any case as much as we hate spam at least its better for us that he does this than him doing hard drugs.

    22. Re:Whats his email? by brianosaurus · · Score: 1

      Imagine how much more they would make if they targetted only the morons^H^H^H^H^H^H people who buy.

      Getting 1 hit in 10 has got to be better than 1 hit in 10,000.

      --
      blog
    23. Re:Whats his email? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck You.

    24. Re:Whats his email? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Jackass

      Is that any way to sign your messages?

    25. Re:Whats his email? by wiseguy2112 · · Score: 1

      It's pretty easy to be a 45 year old grandfather. My oldest son will be 25 when I'm 45. How does it show that the guy has bad judgement?

    26. Re:Whats his email? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Saying "Hey, I did this too." is never a sure fire strategy when you're trying to show that something is a good idea. For all you know, you've just convinced your listeners that you're an idiot as well.

    27. Re:Whats his email? by fpp · · Score: 2, Funny

      Having a child at 20 years of age is not good judgement. The fact that you don't recognize this proves the poster's point.

    28. Re:Whats his email? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      He's probably even got an E-mail filter that removes everything but spam.

      So do I... it's called "Hotmail"

    29. Re:Whats his email? by Alarion · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dear Cynical Moose,
      How would you like to try some MUN V!4gra!!??

      The flightgear potency of this product is c++ amazing!!! You will be bio hard for hours, if not days!!

      cl!c| here to buy v1agr4!

      sorry, I couldn't resist ;)

    30. Re:Whats his email? by Shakrai · · Score: 1
      My guess is, like many property managers, his residence is provided (as long as he works for his employer) and living in Manhattan you've got to have more money that that to keep a car, so he and his wife probably use the subways and buses for transport. Take away housing and transportation and you find you don't really need to make a lot to live comfortably on.

      If you don't have to pay rent or insure/park an automobile (ever get insurance when living in NYC? It's an experience) then NYC isn't all that much more expensive then most other parts of the country. In fact you can probably live cheaper because many items (food) aren't going to cost you nearly as much because you have such a broad selection of places to shop from. FYI: A 30 day metrocard costs $70.

      Of course the New York City/Yonkers income tax sucks. Whatta do?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    31. Re:Whats his email? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> I sure don't need or want it.

      I sure don't want spam either, but that doesn't mean I don't need penis enlargement pills.

    32. Re:Whats his email? by cynicalmoose · · Score: 1

      Don't worry - I just checked, and I've been sent e-mails with cl!c|, V!4gra and v1agr4. The filter would just mark it as unsure, and I'd delete it without training.

      --
      Exercise your right not to vote. thinkoutside.org
    33. Re:Whats his email? by wiseguy2112 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So you are able to judge my life and judgement knowing exactly one fact about me? Is it sound judgment for just anyone to have a child at 20? No, it isn't. Things have turned out fine for me. My son is a great kid. He's better behaved and makes better grades than most of his peers who's parents are older. While having a child at 19 may not be a great idea for most, I wouldn't change a thing. And unsound judgement at 19 does not mean I have bad judgement for the rest of my life. I believe the poster failed to recognize that point.

    34. Re:Whats his email? by Basehart · · Score: 1

      He should write a letter to these guys letting them know he's getting low on stuff and needs more:

      YE Saver, 1440 Coral Ridge Dr., Suite 191, Coral Springs, FL 33071

      Say No To Spam, P.O. Box 631, Clearwater, FL 33756

      Flowing Deals, 5444 Westheimer., #1975, Houston, TX 77056

      Email Department c/o NorthBeachTrends 20533 Biscayne Blvd. Suite 4-1322 Aventura, FL 33180

      Meditay LLC c/o ERC 180 South 300 West, Suite 318 Salt Lake City, UT 84111

      Sweepsgame.com at 160 International Pkwy ste 250, Heathrow, FL 32746

      Optinrealbig.com LLC, 1333 W 120th Ave. Suite 101, Westminster, Colorado 80234

      I turned my filters off for about thirty seconds to get these samples.

    35. Re:Whats his email? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks no. I really don't want a permanent link to them.

    36. Re:Whats his email? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      I bet he filters out any email that wasn't posted via Exchange Server.

    37. Re:Whats his email? by wiseguy2112 · · Score: 1

      Neither is assuming that someone is an idiot because they are a grandparent at the age of 45. What is the magic age at which having children becomes good judgement? I'm really curious what the minimum age of becoming a grandparent should be. Is it 50? 60? Inquiring minds want to know.

    38. Re:Whats his email? by David+Gould · · Score: 2, Funny


      He treats spam as a store that comes to you in your inbox, and sells some stuff online

      Translation: He's not satisfied with the size of his penis.

      --
      David Gould
      main(i){putchar(340056100>>(i-1)*5&31|!!(i<6)<< 6)&&main(++i);}
    39. Re:Whats his email? by netglen · · Score: 1

      What a creepy article. It's sad looking into the mind of this individual who is addicted to buying junk. Here is an example of a poor schmuck who is at the bottom of a triangle scheme. Blindly buying crud from people higher up in the triangle and barely selling anything to people who would become the new triangle bottom. One would think it would be a lot cheaper to join a MMORPG and go into the [ingame]buying/selling of virtual items. Instead of wasting hundreds of dollars a week, he would just waste $10-$20 per month plus any RL time.

    40. Re:Whats his email? by B.D.Mills · · Score: 1

      Interesting they didn't give out his email address.
      Shame that. I have a small collection of bridges I want to sell.

      --

      The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke
    41. Re:Whats his email? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no public comment on whether or not it was a good idea, although I do have a general opinion - I only mention that this isn't the best way to support your argument.

      Your later post mentioning that your child was a well behaved and conscientious student was a better example - however, the question was not whether a twenty year old could make a good parent, and raise an excellent child, but whether it was an act of sound judgement to have a child at that point. A better argument would have been to just point out that some twenty year olds have the maturity and financial reserves that some thirty year olds haven't achieved.

      I wish you well with your family - and I didn't assume you're an idiot. I do have a question for you though - with your experience, would you recommend your child has children as young as you did, or to wait a bit longer?

      -- The same AC as above.
    42. Re:Whats his email? by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      How can you say NYC food is cheaper? The article said he bought Newports (blargh) for $2.85 a pack via spam, a third of what he pays at the corner store. A THIRD! So that means one pack of Newports, ghetto cigarettes, cost over $7 per pack.

      Even in Dallas and other big cities you'll pay about $3 per pack for Newports. Manhattan must be expensive as hell. I call BS on this article.

    43. Re:Whats his email? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think its fine for my 20yr old wife. Of course I'm 40.

    44. Re:Whats his email? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In any case as much as we hate spam at least its better for us that he does this than him doing hard drugs.

      The devil you say.

      An addiction to "hard drugs" will only wreck his life and maybe that of his wife. Spam is well on its way to destroying email for millions of people. The guy is clearly sick, and I'd prefer that his sickness take him -- and the parasites he's supporting -- out of play sooner rather than later.

    45. Re:Whats his email? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i would rather he do hard drugs.

    46. Re:Whats his email? by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > You should forward all of your spam to uce@ftc.gov.

      I used to do that, but a couple of years ago it got to the point where it was
      using too much of my bandwidth, and I had to stop. (My spam volume has gone
      up several hundred percent since then...)

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    47. Re:Whats his email? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an asshat. New York City is one of the safest big cities in the country, and has been for years. But I guess if you were smart enough to know that you'd be smart enough to work here.

      SINATRA:"If I can make it there..."

      You can't. Stay in Podunk.

    48. Re:Whats his email? by jesse.k · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      ciggarettes are heavily taxed in NYC, unlike food.

    49. Re:Whats his email? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cigarettes are $6-$7 a pack in Chicago. $5.50 if you get lucky. Do your homework pal.

    50. Re:Whats his email? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You guys are getting assraped. Cigarettes are still relatively cheap down south.

      That gives me an idea...

    51. Re:Whats his email? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pkennedy@nyc.rr.com

      ...appears to be his wife's email as listed on the whois record of dduo.com. umm?

    52. Re:Whats his email? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I wonder. How long do you think will this guy's erection stay? And how low is his mortgage? And did he get the 22.000.000 US $ from Africa? And does he really need all that porn with such a big...

    53. Re:Whats his email? by Distortal · · Score: 1

      Well most of the spammers have it already...

      I'm more intrigued by the fact that it's an artists impression of what he looks like, rather than a photo.

    54. Re:Whats his email? by Jafar00 · · Score: 1

      Yahoo mail is the same. I have an account that just get viral spams every day. "Yeah sure! I'll click on this Document.pif file because you say so" ;) LOL

      --
      RebateFX.com - Spread rebates for Forex traders
    55. Re:Whats his email? by Shakrai · · Score: 1
      ciggarettes are heavily taxed in NYC, unlike food.

      Forget NYC -- they are heavily taxed in the entire state of NY. As a non-smoker I must say this really breaks my heart.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    56. Re:Whats his email? by Shakrai · · Score: 1
      How can you say NYC food is cheaper? The article said he bought Newports (blargh) for $2.85 a pack via spam, a third of what he pays at the corner store. A THIRD! So that means one pack of Newports, ghetto cigarettes, cost over $7 per pack.

      Cigarettes are food items? <Sarcasm>Guess I stand corrected then, NYC is expensive</Sarcasm>

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    57. Re:Whats his email? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use hotmail regularly and noticed a couple months ago that the spam received had decreased dramatically overnight. From a regular 30/day to 0 in the first two weeks after noticing.

      It now stands at about 2/day. The ones that currently get through are very small in size.

      At first I thought something was wrong, but then noticed comments on /. describing the same thing.

      Just prior to the time things changed, I was about to drop hotmail entirely. Good timing on their part.

    58. Re:Whats his email? by amplt1337 · · Score: 1

      You can. (I do it.) You can do it quite nicely actually if you're not too picky about housing.

      Most people would have trouble with the midtown apartment on that money though.

      --
      Freedom isn't free; its price is the well-being of others.
    59. Re:Whats his email? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      If you're calling BS on the cigarette prices, then you're wrong. Between the already high prices and the taxes (If I'm not mistaken, the city itself levies taxes on them too), you will have to pay between $7 and $9 for smokes. Money was the reason I quit, too.

    60. Re:Whats his email? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Of course it doesn't break your heart. After all, why should someone get to do something he/she enjoys when you don't enjoy the same thing. Damn anti-smokers (as opposed to non-smokers) make me sick.

    61. Re:Whats his email? by Shakrai · · Score: 1
      Of course it doesn't break your heart. After all, why should someone get to do something he/she enjoys when you don't enjoy the same thing. Damn anti-smokers (as opposed to non-smokers) make me sick.

      Because what you enjoy makes me cough, sick to my stomach and makes my clothes and hair stink if I'm anywhere near you. Even outdoors it affects me if I have the misfortune of being downwind from you.

      You want to poison yourself in the privacy of your own home or car? Go ahead. You don't have the right to poison those of us around you. And you don't have the right to toss your fucking cigerrete butts all over my sidewalks and parks.

      Smokers are the most inconsiderate people on the face of the Earth.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  2. Really... by hookedup · · Score: 5, Funny

    There is only so much male enhancement products a man can buy.

    They seem to be the only spam i've been getting lately. Maybe my wife is feeding them my email addresses...

    1. Re:Really... by Jotaigna · · Score: 2, Funny

      that guy will need BIC-TCP.

      --
      "The quality of life is inversely proportional to the number of keys on your keyring."
    2. Re:Really... by eln · · Score: 1

      I get a ton of offers for great rates on a mortgage for a property I RENTED five years ago. So much for the concept of targeted advertising.

    3. Re:Really... by brejc8 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Reminds me of a spoof spam male enhancement pyramid scheme.
      You divide your penis into one inch parts and send them off to the people on the list and forward the email on.
      Within a week you will receive 20feet of penis.

    4. Re:Really... by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, it's like many RPG games, you can only have two gloves, two bracers, 10 rings, one headgear, etc... because that's all that will fit on your appendage.

      I'll leave the reader to apply that logic to the parent post.

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    5. Re:Really... by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny
      There is only so much male enhancement products a man can buy.

      He prbably doesn't need a belt.

      I can't help but wonder how many worms and virii are on his computer, not to mention spyware.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    6. Re:Really... by phutureboy · · Score: 5, Funny

      I've thought it would be funny to buy and use each and every penis enlargement product pitched to me via spam for one year, and document the results on a weblog. At the end of that year, I bet my schlong would be enormous.

    7. Re:Really... by Cruciform · · Score: 5, Funny

      It will be great when spammers finally start seeing jail time.

      They'll be receiving unlimited penis!

    8. Re:Really... by Cruciform · · Score: 2, Funny

      From bruising and swelling maybe.

    9. Re:Really... by gmfeng · · Score: 1

      What do you think this junkie is doing? "A 45-year-old grandfather,..."

    10. Re:Really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FreeBSD users already see jail(8) time.

    11. Re:Really... by HD+Webdev · · Score: 1

      what does "virii" mean?

      I think it's similar to "wormii".

      --
      This is not a dream, not a dream...we are transmitting from the year 1-9-9-9.
    12. Re:Really... by thelasttemptation · · Score: 5, Funny

      Eleven rings, thank you very much... :P

    13. Re:Really... by chimpo13 · · Score: 1, Funny

      I get them all the time for my PO Box, but the interest rates are so low how can I pass them up?

    14. Re:Really... by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 2, Informative

      Do you have any idea what's in those pills? The FDA sure doesn't. You're a lot better off getting a bunch of male lab rats and a little ruler. If one of them turns into the rat John Holmes, you found a winner.

      -B

    15. Re:Really... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Or you might be a tourist attraction.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    16. Re:Really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      11 rings instead of 10 needed? I thought that engagement ring looked different. One Ring to bind them.

    17. Re:Really... by michrech · · Score: 1

      What happens when you run out of 1 inch parts to sent to all the people on the list?

      --
      bork bork bork!
    18. Re:Really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and a dozen do-nuts

    19. Re:Really... by buckeyeguy · · Score: 1

      Speak for yourself.... I find having a herbally-enhanced 20-inch dick to be rather empowering. Gotta watch out for the car door, though.

      --
      I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
    20. Re:Really... by Mateito · · Score: 1

      Its called a Frenum Ladder... and no.. that is NOT a work-safe link.

    21. Re:Really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't do this one. It is a total ripoff. I sent off six pieces more than a month ago and haven't received anything back yet.

    22. Re:Really... by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      There is only so much male enhancement products a man can buy.

      Hey, he's getting good spam. Did you read the sort of thing he's buying from spam e-mails? Things like an antique pinball machine or first-edition mystery novels!

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    23. Re:Really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can't stir the pudding, then lick the bowl!

    24. Re:Really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I have to say it's disturbing how accepting this culture is of the idea that rape is an inevitable feature of prisons.

      I mean seriously now, we pay the guards to do what exactly? They can strip search an entire cell block in 30 minutes flat but they can't stop the inmates from raping one another. Puhlease! It's added value punishment.

      It just disgusts me that people feel this is acceptable enough that jokes are made daily about it.

      God I want to move to Madrid.

    25. Re:Really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah thats really funny when people get raped. Maybe you should be a comedian.

    26. Re:Really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    27. Re:Really... by mousse-man · · Score: 1

      Ring of Priapos +1, you mean?

      (Description: Transform you into an upstanding member of the society, +1 charm)

    28. Re:Really... by Inuchance · · Score: 1

      Hmm, maybe I should become a spammer...!

    29. Re:Really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's an underground geek thing. You need to get in to understand.

    30. Re:Really... by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      Yes, the spanish police and correctional system are soooo much better than anything in Canada or the US.

      Anyway, it's not all about rape. There's LOTS of healthy, loving, psychotically fueled homosexual relationships on Oz.

    31. Re:Really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So move instead of whining.
      Prison rape IS funny. People who don't behave themselves and steal from or assault the good citizens of my country DESERVE to be breech- loaded thoroughly, painfully, and often.

    32. Re:Really... by afroborg · · Score: 1

      It is when it's spammers getting raped... Death is too good for them

      --
      my sig could kick your sig's arse...
  3. Not against SPAM by bsharitt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is why I'm not completly against Spam, but I wish they would clearly mark it so those who don't want it won't get it and this guy will.

    1. Re:Not against SPAM by interiot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As long as the economics of spam mean that there's nearly nothing stopping more people from sending it, virtually guaranteeing that the signal/noise ratio of my mailbox will go down for the rest of time, I'm against it. Until that can be fixed (legislatively, technically, whatever), I think most spammers will be hated, independant of whatever they might be selling or whoever might be buying it.

    2. Re:Not against SPAM by dsci · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The real point is one of opt-in vs. opt-out. This guy can opt-in to all the crap he wants to get. Opt-out should be the default, and it SHOULD BE illegal to send spam to anyone who has not explicitly opted-in.

      --
      Computational Chemistry products and services.
    3. Re:Not against SPAM by Nic-o-demus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The scenario I would like to see is spammers simply puting "Advertisement" on the subject line (as per the legislation). They will still get all their repeat buyers and guys like this one, and filtering for those who don't want it will be a breaze. ISP's won't have to do anything anymore, which will remove the incentive for spammers to trick them in some way. And all the cool filter methods like the bayes can turn around and be used to filter ads into categories that they are most interested in (and we can still make fun of them, but it will be light-hearted, because it's not effecting our inboxes anymore :)

      There are two problems with this. The first is the percentage of buyers who are not repeat buyers, and who hate spam. It's the person who hates spam, but when he was tricked into looking at the spam that was selling those Iraqi most wanted cards, broke down and got some, and then swore off spam from then on. This wedge of income for spammers is what marketing types are always counting on. The philosophy is: "They don't know they want it yet- they need me to tell them that they want it before they buy it." This isn't a major cache cow for most business people, but it's the wedge of income that marketers, including spammers, spend the most effort on. What could be done to remove this incentive from marketers? Beats me.

      The second challenge is Microsoft (though it's not a challenge yet- it could become one). They would much rather be in control of the whole solution- they could have stamps or push their passports or do something like that that would bring in more revenue or cement their hold on the email market etc.- we all know the routine. To their high level corporate strategy, all the spammers simply saying "advertisement" would ruin an excellent opportunity to... extend the empire, so to speak. So, I don't know all the arguments yet, but you can bet they'll be making some in the next year or so that try to defeat the simplest solution.

      So the lesson is, as much as I hate to say it, ISP's need to reward spammers who say "Advertisement" on the subject line, IMO. They need to let their spam through into some box for those who want to receive it. I believe you would see a slow, steady trickle of spammers resorting to this, because they would get the best response rates from it.

    4. Re:Not against SPAM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That's like saying your against junk *snail* mail. There are companies that mail you, me, and this guy offers for mortgages, credit cards, etc all the time...and you cannot opt out of that either. What makes spam different is that a traditional direct mail company has to analyze a segment of their mail list and decide if it is worth mailing an offer to them. They have to anlayze each mailing because it costs them postage to get that offer to someone on their list. Spammers do not have to do any real thinking and can mail their offer to a much higher number of people and still be profitable with a much lower response rate.

    5. Re:Not against SPAM by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      This is why I'm not completly against Spam, but I wish they would clearly mark it so those who don't want it won't get it and this guy will.

      Get Congress to do something useful and mandate that an X-Spam tag be added to all unsolicited e-mail. Then just filter on that. Until that happens I'll let Spamassassin do it.

    6. Re:Not against SPAM by arkanes · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Disclaimer: I hate spam with a passion, and can be rather annoying when I'm ranting about it

      That said, this guy LIKES random stuff coming to him, because he doesn't have to seek it out. I've had a few extra cups of coffee today, so I can almost get my head around this concept.

    7. Re:Not against SPAM by arkanes · · Score: 1

      You actually CAN opt out of direct mail. Companies are required to remove you, and theres forms (get them from your local post office) you can file to prevent most unsolicited stuff (like the kind addressed to occupant). This works much better than email opt-out because theres a single, controlled source of delivery. Also, direct mail marketing is generally much more legitimate than spam - theres a direct paper trail back to the sender, and it's neccesarily domestic rather than international, so it's alot harder to pull off the same sort of scams that spammers can.

    8. Re:Not against SPAM by tsg · · Score: 1

      Spam is wrong, not just because it's unwanted, but because it puts the cost of delivery (at least partially) on the recipient. That's what makes it so cheap. It's the same reason why telemarketers aren't allowed to call cellphones and advertisers can't send junk faxes.

      They can spam me all they want once they're paying the entire cost of delivery.

      --
      People's desire to believe they are right is much stronger than their desire to be right.
    9. Re:Not against SPAM by nuintari · · Score: 1

      Yeah, except it still costs the recipient network money. Bandwidth is not cheap, and I am not happy about how much of my DS3 is saturated by spam that i do not want, nor do any of my customers want.

      Selling stuff or not, its a theft of services.

      --

      --Nuintari

      slashdot : where an opinion can be wrong.

    10. Re:Not against SPAM by Endive4Ever · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're describing a problem with email as it is presently standardized. Not Spam.

      Spam is the symptom of a problem: a broken, obsolete, 'consensus' based Internet. I mean, the 'standards' are still called 'Request For Comment's, for goodness sake.

      The Spam problem won't go away until the Internet is regulated. At which point most of the people who complain about Spam will switch to complaining about the regulations.

      --
      ---
    11. Re:Not against SPAM by mandalayx · · Score: 1

      As long as the economics of spam mean that there's nearly nothing stopping more people from sending it, virtually guaranteeing that the signal/noise ratio of my mailbox will go down for the rest of time, I'm against it.

      Then I gather you are for the "electronic postage" movement, i.e. making people pay to send e-mail?

      Because even if spam were illegal, look at speeding. That's illegal, right?

    12. Re:Not against SPAM by AndyChrist · · Score: 1

      The simplest legislative solution would be to legalize the killing of spammers. I envision an eviscerated corpse, strangled with networking cable, with a can of spam kicked into it's mouth, the teeth smashed to shards.

      Of course, the complication would come in proving that the victim was a spammer. But once that's covered, it should be justifyable homicide.

    13. Re:Not against SPAM by ezzzD55J · · Score: 1
      Get Congress to do something useful and mandate that an X-Spam tag be added to all unsolicited e-mail. Then just filter on that. Until that happens I'll let Spamassassin do it.
      Hm, your spamassassin must be working better than mine is nowadays :(
    14. Re:Not against SPAM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I personally can't see this as a legitimate reason for Spam, given that Googling for such "deals" yields more than ample options (ie. "cheap vitamins", "cheap cigarettes", "penis enlargement").

      If you really can't live without the latest v1@gr_a scam, take the 2 seconds (and 2 brain cells) it takes to find it on the web - instead of supporting an industry that condemns everyone else to e-mail purgatory!

    15. Re:Not against SPAM by Dimensio · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So the lesson is, as much as I hate to say it, ISP's need to reward spammers who say "Advertisement" on the subject line, IMO.

      What, you mean like waiting an hour before disconnecting their account?

      Oh, you mean the receving ISP. Yes, they need to "reward" spammers who are honest when they engage in theft of service and trespass to chattel.

      Spam is theft. No amount of "explaining" will change this fact. Spammers belong either in jail or buried in several tons of concrete. The spam will end when spammers are no longer physically able to access a computer.

    16. Re:Not against SPAM by interiot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm wasn't trying to advocate for any specific solution, just noting that it seems like there's nothing keeping the top spammers from sending out greater and greater numbers of emails every year. If speeders went 75mph this year and 90 next year and 105 the year after, you'd start to get worried, no? There a number of things keeping people from going arbitrarily fast (police officers giving tickets and possibly jail time, higher insurance premiums), and similarly there's probably a combination of things that will eventually at least make spam reach an equilibrium.

    17. Re:Not against SPAM by sketerpot · · Score: 1
      The problem is that this guy is supporting spammers in the worst way: giving them money, which keeps them in business spamming millions of aggravated people.
      Scott Richter, who runs a mass e-mailing company called Optinrealbig.com LLC in Westminster, Colo., says about a fifth of those who order his vitamins and other products buy again. "Those repeat buyers help generate a bulk of the revenue," he says.
    18. Re:Not against SPAM by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

      This is why I'm not completly against Spam, but I wish they would clearly mark it so those who don't want it won't get it and this guy will.

      So you're not against spammers wasting my bandwidth with messages that I then have to filter out? You don't mind ISPs having to buy extra bandwidth, servers, and storage to deal with the spam that you aren't "completely against"? How generous of you!

      Get a clue: spammers are thieves. They steal bandwidth and storage from ISPs and Internet users. Every person who pays an ISP for Internet connectivity is paying extra for the spam. Why the hell should I have to pay for spam just so that some clueless idiot can get ads promising to enlarge his undersized dick?

    19. Re:Not against SPAM by ball-lightning · · Score: 1

      The simplest legislative solution would be to legalize the killing of spammers. I envision an eviscerated corpse, strangled with networking cable, with a can of spam kicked into it's mouth, the teeth smashed to shards.

      Wouldn't be too much fun if they fought back though, eh?

    20. Re:Not against SPAM by AndyChrist · · Score: 1

      Why would that not be fun? Where's the fun if there's no struggle? I'll bet you always cheat when you play computer games, huh?

    21. Re:Not against SPAM by FallLine · · Score: 1
      The problem is that this guy is supporting spammers in the worst way: giving them money, which keeps them in business spamming millions of aggravated people
      That is NOT the real root of the problem. People buy crap from junk SNAIL mail too. What prevents the average persons's mailbox from becoming overloaded with it is that it costs the sender a substantial amount of money to send it in the first place. This amount is high enough that they have to be pretty smart about who they send it to, i.e., they typically send it to particular demographics, to those people whom some sort of business relationship is already established, or with a product that's reasonably desirable. Whereas with email, the marginal cost to send an additional email is practically zero, so it makes sense to send email to any and everyone even if there's only a one in a ten thousand chance that a reader is interested. Even if you half the number of people who respond to spam by buying product, the spammers still have a business model in all likelyhood. Someone is always going to be interested and email is only going to get cheaper to send (unless we start getting smart and require small payments to deliver email from unknown/untrusted users/servers).
    22. Re:Not against SPAM by ball-lightning · · Score: 1

      I'll bet you always cheat when you play computer games, huh?

      IDKFA ;-)

    23. Re:Not against SPAM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Have you heard of NetFlix or a similar home-delivery video rental service?

      What a stupid question. Think about it.

    24. Re:Not against SPAM by texas · · Score: 1

      Still doesn't work. I can think of at least two problems:

      1) The spammer is still taking up resources. My ISP's mail servers still have to accept and store the mail for me, and I have to waste time downloading it before I can filter it to trash. So in the end, I end up paying for it, both with time and by paying more to my ISP because they need to upgrade their infrastructure to support all this "legit" spam.

      2) Assume #1 isn't a problem, then what if I want to send a legitimate, non-spam e-mail that has the word "advertisement" in the subject line? It will mistakenly get filtered to trash. A slight modification that might work would be to mandate a spam-specific header instead.

      Not to mention that spammers want you to see their spam. They think that you don't know that you need what they are offering, but that if they only show you what you're missing, you'll rush to buy it. They want to get people on impulse buys, so they won't want to give you an easy way to just ignore them. It's the same argument that the telemarketers use, and it is valid because of all the weak-willed compulsive buyers out there.

      I believe we need a technical mechanism within the POP/SMTP infrastructure, or a replacement, that locks things down more. What, exactly, does that entail? That's what we've got to figure out.

      --
      Hey, how'd you know I was lookin' at you if you weren't lookin' at me?
    25. Re:Not against SPAM by sketerpot · · Score: 1

      Yes, you're right that that's the root cause, but I was thinking "the problem I have with this guy".

  4. Maybe it's true by Gzip+Christ · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ah, I get it now. Those "enlarge your penis" spams really do work - if you respond to them, you're nothing but a big dick.

    1. Re:Maybe it's true by dzelenka · · Score: 1

      Inquiring minds want to know how large his member is, and how large it was before he started buying from SPAM.

      He probably gets his money from that nice guy in Nigeria...

      --
      Bah!
  5. That Number Again.. by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Funny

    I've got some old junk around the house I could probably dress up in an ad. I should mail him, "Do not miss out on this opportunity! xcxzxczx"

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:That Number Again.. by The+Queen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, why settle for the tax write-off receipts from Goodwill? You can sell your junk to this guy, and the thousands (I shudder to think, MILLIONS?) like him and make twice the dough!

      *sigh* I am all for freedom, and I believe in the purest form of capitalism, and unfortunately spam falls in there. It's just a shame that enough of the population is ignorant to the fact that they are perpetuating a very annoying business model.

      --

      The House Between - Original Sci-Fi Series
    2. Re:That Number Again.. by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      Freedom and the purest form of capitalism are incompatible.

    3. Re:That Number Again.. by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Yeah, why settle for the tax write-off receipts from Goodwill?

      The junk is still sitting around my place because Goodwill doesn't want it. Even they have standards.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    4. Re:That Number Again.. by Bombcar · · Score: 1

      The junk is still sitting around my place because Goodwill doesn't want it. Even they have standards.

      That is where Ebay comes into play.

    5. Re:That Number Again.. by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      That is where Ebay comes into play.

      Where do you think I bought most of it? :-)

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    6. Re:That Number Again.. by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      A lot of things that Goodwill refuses (they refuse most computer and electronic stuff that isn't obvuous dumbed-down consumer junk your Grandma could own) will sell for a good price on eBay, if you know how to identify, describe, and test it.

      Value-add is a good way to make money on eBay. People like me scour certain categories for new listings of cheap 'buy it now' items in the wrong category and/or being sold by someone who doesn't know shit about what s/he is selling.

      --
      ---
    7. Re:That Number Again.. by Bombcar · · Score: 1

      Also make sure your auctions ends around 2 PM PST on a Sunday. This makes the bidding much more energetic and exciting. If ends during a workday, it'll go for much less. :)

  6. oh boy... by Drunken_Jackass · · Score: 3, Funny

    This guy needs a better hobby than answering spam. Maybe he can practice dodging oncoming traffic.

    --
    There are 01 types of people in this world. Those that understand binary, and me.
    1. Re:oh boy... by IthnkImParanoid · · Score: 4, Funny

      As the article mentions, he is unfortunately a 45-year old grandfather. Not only has he reproduced already, but his spawn is reproducing quickly. It's too late, the world is doomed.

      --
      It's nothing but crumpled porno and Ayn Rand.
    2. Re:oh boy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not incredibly hard to be a 45 yr old grandfather. Mom's only 42 and well, if I had finished college 3 years ago like I should have, I would have already married and had at least one toddler.

    3. Re:oh boy... by SEWilco · · Score: 1, Funny
      Consumers who already reproduced before they began participating in spam are irrelevant in studying the revelance of spam to evolution. Spam can be deadly and not be relevant if it begins after a consumer is no longer part of the gene pool.

      The relevance of spam and reproduction should be studied in a group from birth until death. The email addresses of that group are...

    4. Re:oh boy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I once had a coworker who was a grandfather at 37

    5. Re:oh boy... by tvh2k · · Score: 1

      ...or not dodging it! I don't think the world needs any of his kind.

    6. Re:oh boy... by Tin+Foil+Hat · · Score: 1

      So what's wrong with a little roadside entertainment? I mean, who wants to be reasonable when there is blind revenge to be had.

      --
      No matter how many of my rights are taken away, somehow I still don't feel safe. -Frigid Monkey
    7. Re:oh boy... by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      Sure... my mother had my sister at 21 (married at 18), and my sister had a kid just before 19. Mom was NOT happy about being a grandmother before age 40 though :)

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    8. Re:oh boy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course they've already reproduced. He probably so pumped full of *stimulants*, that even his kids came out with a stiffy - girls included!

    9. Re:oh boy... by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Well, that seems like a fertile family line. Must have been the penis pills.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
  7. Oh. c'mon now... by doppleganger871 · · Score: 1

    ...I'm sure some resourceful /.'er could find at least one of his e-mail addys... maybe we could get that number from 150 up to 1500 a day or so. He's be REALLY happy then.

    1. Re:Oh. c'mon now... by Maditude · · Score: 1

      ...I'm sure some resourceful /.'er could find at least one of his e-mail addys... maybe we could get that number from 150 up to 1500 a day or so. He's be REALLY happy then.

      Ugh, you made me spew coffee all over my desk and keyboard. Good laugh tho.

      The article had plenty of personal details, anybody out there NY up for an intervention?

    2. Re:Oh. c'mon now... by SkjeggApe · · Score: 0

      A simple Google search reveals what looks like his phone listing ....

  8. People fall for crap TV ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    People buy crap sold by infomercials.

    You can sell anything to almost anybody.

    1. Re:People fall for crap TV ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Good point. And spam is WAY cheaper than infomercials -- don't have to pay the actors (who always somehow seem to be the same 5 people) and the airtime.


      Just read in a previous slashdot spam posting that addresses cost around $30 for 10,000 addresses -- if only 1% of those actually click on the link in your email and 25% of those people buy your product, you're probably still making a fair amount of profit. And if just one of those people is a repeat buyer, you've got yourself many more sales. I can see why spammers are still successful.


      How did I get such bad Karma? Annoying that i have to post anonymously

    2. Re:People fall for crap TV ads by lordbios · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The difference is that I can choose to watch the infomercial. Sure I can choose not to read the spam, but I still have to spend time (time=$) filtering/deleting it.

    3. Re:People fall for crap TV ads by MrBlue+VT · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, I almost bought one of these great swords. They're so high quality!

    4. Re:People fall for crap TV ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think clicking the remote is also a form of filtering/deleting. Plus, you still have to waste time for your brain to register that the show is an infomercial.

    5. Re:People fall for crap TV ads by Imperator · · Score: 1

      Correction: You can sell anything to somebody.

      --

      Gates' Law: Every 18 months, the speed of software halves.
    6. Re:People fall for crap TV ads by Maserati · · Score: 1

      "It's got a dragon on the blade."

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
    7. Re:People fall for crap TV ads by MerlynEmrys67 · · Score: 1
      I am so proud when my 4 1/2 year old daughter sees a comercial for a "cool new toy" on TV and turns to me and says - "Daddy, they are just trying to sell cheap plastic junk, aren't they ?"

      Makes me proud to be a Dad

      --
      I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them
  9. so he's mortgaged out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and has a huge member ship to BMG whilst downing Omaha steaks?

    1. Re:so he's mortgaged out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      was that funny whitespace?
      is that a 'huge membership' or
      'huge member ship', presumably after the viagra has invigorated the member in question?

  10. My guess. by Omni+Magnus · · Score: 1

    I don't know about you guys, but I am betting that he is insecure about his size, and thought that adding 3 inches seemed like a good idea.

    1. Re:My guess. by eln · · Score: 3, Funny

      I assume the reason they have what looks like a courtroom sketch of the guy accompanying the story rather than a photograph is because his enormous penis keeps blocking the camera.

    2. Re:My guess. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the WSJ doesn't use photos... they think it's more sophisticated to have the drawings instead.

    3. Re:My guess. by mec · · Score: 1

      No, that's the usual kind of picture that you see in Wall Street Journal articles. Go down to your local news-stand or library and look at a couple of Journals and you'll see.

      (I think I've just been trolled).

    4. Re:My guess. by addaboy · · Score: 1

      hhmm, no. it's because that's what WSJ does. they always have a drawn picture of people. go pick up a copy at your news stand (gasp!!) you'll see.

    5. Re:My guess. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, it's because photographs still your soul, idiot.

    6. Re:My guess. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (I think I've just been trolled).

      No...you just have no sense of humor.

    7. Re:My guess. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      almost funny, moron.

  11. Just Goes To Show... by LotsaCaffeine · · Score: 3, Insightful

    An idiot is born everyday.

    1. Re:Just Goes To Show... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      So which day were you?

    2. Re:Just Goes To Show... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A fool and his money are soon parted.

      As the saying goes...

    3. Re:Just Goes To Show... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just Goes To Show... An idiot is born everyday

      No it doesn't. All the article shows is that there is an idiot.

    4. Re:Just Goes To Show... by LotsaCaffeine · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sunday

    5. Re:Just Goes To Show... by garcia · · Score: 2, Funny

      nah. No matter how hard we try to make something idiot proof the universe is always able to create a better idiot.

    6. Re:Just Goes To Show... by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      no the guy is not an idiot...

      he's a spammer. read the article... He buys items and re-sells them on his "websites"...

      This ladies and gentlemen, is a spammer, he is trying to do PR for his "industry" and if he was to be researched a bit further we would see what spam companies he is behind...

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    7. Re:Just Goes To Show... by John+Harrison · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Maybe this guy is a plant, but the impression I got from the article is that he is mentally ill. He is purchasing things in order to feel "blessed". He should seek professional help. Prozac has been shown to improve the lives of shopaholics.

      I'm not joking here. I'm just surprised that his wife puts up with it. He is buying junk that he doesn't use because it makes him feel good to purchase things. That is messed up.

    8. Re:Just Goes To Show... by r2vf · · Score: 5, Funny

      no the guy is not an idiot...

      he's a spammer.

      *throat clearing noise*

    9. Re:Just Goes To Show... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      look farther down in the postings here.. someone discovered that he is a "seller" of spamming tools and lists.

      He's a spammer. and yes spammers should seek professional help.. but instead of prozac I suggest high doses of lithium and a frontal lobotomy for each one. :-)

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    10. Re:Just Goes To Show... by John+Harrison · · Score: 1
      It isn't clear that he is much of a seller. The article caused me to think that his attempts at selling were rather pathetic.

      The item that I noticed that I think supports your case is that he states a preference for "small sellers" as opposed to corporations. You could say that he is trying to paint spammers as the "little guys" using spam as a equalizer against giant corporations.

    11. Re:Just Goes To Show... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then research him. You can do a whois just like the next guy. You can google him too. Don't just sit there being a fucking pussy and expect your work handed to you.

      Fucking slashbot

    12. Re:Just Goes To Show... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well if you fucking looked at the fucking responses then your fucking feeble little brain would fucking see that the fucking asshole is a fucking spammer selling fucking spam tools to fucking spammers.

      wow only fucking idiots say fucking alot and lumpy has a shashdot rating much higher than some low IQ fuckwit like you that cant think of a bigger word to use than fuck.

      mential midgets like you make me smile, knowing that your family lines are full of genetic mistakes that are only compounding and making your genetic contributions only more and more worthless.

    13. Re:Just Goes To Show... by Lost+Race · · Score: 1

      On other words: See Rule #3.

  12. I take back... by Stopmotioncleaverman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...my comment on the other thread. It seems there really are people out there who value their inbox being filled with mindless junk.

    In a survey by MailShell, a San Francisco antispam company, 8% of respondents said they have bought products via spam. Spammers say that percentage is probably low because many people are too embarrassed to admit responding to spam.

    Well, there you go. Far higher than I'd ever have imagined...and the spammers admit that replying to spam is embarrassing. Guess they realise a bad thing when they see it.

    Although

    Mr. Soto recently spent more than $100 on vitamins

    you do have to question the man's ability to appreciate the value of a dollar. 100 bucks on vitamins? I'll go down the high street and get three bottles for 10, thank you very much.

    1. Re:I take back... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he could have bought 30 bottles for 100 via spam. it doesn't say the quantity he received for his purcase

    2. Re:I take back... by The_K4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Then again how was that survey sent out, by spam? If so they are already talking to a smaller set of people (the first 80% threw it out, so that number could really be 8% of 20% or 1.6%.

    3. Re:I take back... by ari_j · · Score: 1

      $100 is chump change when you're pulling in $150k working an hour a day from home.

    4. Re:I take back... by Imperator · · Score: 1
      you do have to question the man's ability to appreciate the value of a dollar. 100 bucks on vitamins?

      When you spend all day responding to spam, you need a lot of vitamin D.

      --

      Gates' Law: Every 18 months, the speed of software halves.
    5. Re:I take back... by Tailhook · · Score: 1

      100 bucks on vitamins?

      Watched about 45 minutes of The History Channel last night. About 50% of the adds were pills. Allergy pills, vision pills, weight loss pills, energy pills...

      Some of this stuff is borderline criminal. The "better ocular health" one was a good example. Some old guy, driving, almost pulls out in front of a semi-tractor trailer he failed to see. Presumably the eye pill resolves this little problem. He can now detect large, shiny, noisy, fast moving objects at range. Amazing. A new pill has caused someone that must have been as blind as a door knob to become capable of driving safely. Naturally I believe every word and I'm convinced he and the other millions of members of the target audience will be perfectly safe on the road. No doubt they'll all have a high degree of confidence in their super vision and refuse to believe they aren't 110% competent.

      This sort of snake oil is precisely where 99% of that new "prescription drug benefit" will go. Bunch of repackaged vitimins and legal forms of speed.

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    6. Re:I take back... by SlashdotStu · · Score: 1

      In a survey by MailShell, a San Francisco antispam company, 8% of respondents said they have bought products via spam. Spammers say that percentage is probably low because many people are too embarrassed to admit responding to spam.

      Well, there you go. Far higher than I'd ever have imagined...

      Maybe they emailed the survey to random people. Replies would be from a fairly self-selecting group. :)

  13. 18 inches by now? by mao+che+minh · · Score: 2, Funny

    That is a hell of lot of enlargement going on.

    1. Re:18 inches by now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He does look pretty fat. But aren't all Americans fat? Not trying to troll, but isn't that the latest statistic - that all Americans are overweight and "most" are obese?

  14. Imagine the size of his... by VMaN · · Score: 2, Funny

    Imagine the size of his p*n*is... All new herbal med*icine*, add 6!!In*ches

  15. To: Mr. Soto by 0x41 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dear Mr. Soto,
    I have a bridge I'd like to sell you.

    1. Re:To: Mr. Soto by jargoone · · Score: 1

      Falling down?

    2. Re:To: Mr. Soto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Falling down.

  16. Mortgage rates by st0rmshadow · · Score: 4, Funny

    He must have the lowest mortgage rate ever.

    1. Re:Mortgage rates by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 3, Insightful

      He does. It is mentioned in the article.

      His mortgage rate is 0%. (He doesn't have one.)

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
  17. Sheeeeesh! by trp642 · · Score: 5, Funny
    How much can one actually love spam? Its not like there is a huge selection of products. Mr. Soto can now claim the following:
    • He has the world's largest penis, that is never flacid.
    • He makes $10k working at home in his spare time.
    • He's seen Paris Hilton nekkid more than anyone.
    • His wife's breasts are larger.
    • He has the lowest mortgage rate in the world.

    Did I miss anything? I mean damn, how many different ways can you spell V!@G.RA???!
    1. Re:Sheeeeesh! by Stopmotioncleaverman · · Score: 1

      He's also got three hundred college diplomas and has access to every single pr0n page in the world. Not to mention probably having had three liver transplants to make right for all the herbal supplements he's been taking.

    2. Re:Sheeeeesh! by Amnenth · · Score: 1

      He can get big-name OEM software for $15/license?

      Somehow I doubt these guys are peddling legal copies.

    3. Re:Sheeeeesh! by grub · · Score: 4, Funny


      His wife's breasts are larger.

      I could have saved him some money. She should have just rubbed her breasts with toilet paper, it worked on my ex-wife's ass.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    4. Re:Sheeeeesh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He will soon receive large money sums from Nigeria

    5. Re:Sheeeeesh! by gosand · · Score: 5, Funny
      I think you mean...

      He has the woOrld's la.rG_est Pae.n.is, that is nev@r fflAccid.

      He makes $10k woarKING @t homme in his sp.a.re ti_me.

      He's seen P.a r is Hi+ltoon nek&kid more than anyone.

      His wife's br*ea=sts are la%rg"er.

      He has the lowest M.0rt6a6e Re.ate in the w0r1D.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    6. Re:Sheeeeesh! by lubricated · · Score: 1

      and he is high as a kite, on the meds that he gets overnight.

      --
      It has been statistically shown that helmets increase the risk of head injury.
    7. Re:Sheeeeesh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're not legal. I bought one out of curiosity once using a low-limit credit card. I got a disc (WinXP) that worked, but it was tagged as pirated by Microsoft so no updates ever, and 6 months later I had to cancel that card due to fraudulent activity on it (porn site charges).

      The disc was shipped air freight from Russia, billed at a generic credit card clearing house in the UK, and the "contact" had a ".ru" email address.

    8. Re:Sheeeeesh! by swb · · Score: 0, Redundant

      There's actually an old joke about this with essentially the parent's line as the punch line.

      I think it went something like:

      A guy was sick of all of his wife's demands, each day it was for something different, more extravagant and expensive

      Woman: Honey, I want to see a plastic surgeon.
      Man: What for?
      Woman: I'd like my breasts to be bigger, they're not big enough for all the new clothes I want to buy.
      Man: Why spend the money on a plastic surgeon, you can do that at home for free.
      Woman: What? How?
      Man: Just rub your tits with toilet paper -- it sure worked for your ass!

      I'm sure there's a 1001 variations, this one just reminds me of the one I heard.

    9. Re:Sheeeeesh! by lordholm · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Funny thing about spam-filters. I know a doctor and she complained about how all the e-mail about Viagra (sent from colleagues) got lost, she did however get lot's of spam containing the spelling V!@G.RA (or there about).

      She and her colleagues now use codewords to describe the drug in e-mail.

      --
      "Civis Europaeus sum!"
    10. Re:Sheeeeesh! by dagnabit · · Score: 1

      Ha ha! Funniest reply I've read in a while. You just made me shoot coffee out my nose with that one! Thanks a lot...

      Oh well... now I have a reason to clean all the critters out of my keyboard.

    11. Re:Sheeeeesh! by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      Just found this at the bottom of a recent spam. Not sure what they're selling, but i'm strangely compelled to mail the address and find out.

      "Justice, remarked the Scarecrow, with a sigh, is a dangerous thing to meddle withYou have knocked over a good many people with that tube during the past week not really, you can mail P.O. B 1200b Oranjestad Aruba I know, said Rob; but I couldn't help itIt was the only way I had to protect myself "

    12. Re:Sheeeeesh! by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      He also:
      • Owns CDs banned throughout the world.
      • Is stoned on herbal bliss.
      • Can find out anything about anyone.
      • Has had all of his debt forgiven.
      • Possesses multiple passports under different names.
      • Has millions of dollars in life insurance.
      • Knows what the government doesn't want him to know.

      Never underestimate the power of a creative social leper.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    13. Re:Sheeeeesh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Did I miss anything?

      He's made a ton helping out a distressed Nigerian.

      He's got a handful of no-limit platinum credit cards.

      He's met his soulmate

      Saddly, I'm sure there are plenty of others.

    14. Re:Sheeeeesh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just an attempt to avoid bayesian filters, I suspect...

    15. Re:Sheeeeesh! by lakeland · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's just an attempt to destroy your bayesian filter. See, the spammer knows it will still get tagged as spam but now "justice, remarked, scarecrow, sigh, dangerous, ..." are slighly spammy words in your database. If you get a lot of spam then your database will get a very large number of these incorrectly spammy words. Mine is 50MB, and when I was using two word bayesian instead of one-word, it was 200MB.

      Now the next time someone sends you an email about scarecrows (which I guess doesn't happen much) your spam filter goes: oh, I know that word, it's a spammy word! I'm sure the spammers know that any spam filter that starts misclassifying legit mail very quickly gets trashed.

    16. Re:Sheeeeesh! by aclarke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If your doctor friend had used a good Bayesian filter like the one that comes with SpamAssassin, this problem would likely take care of itself. The filter would learn that, say, "Viagra" is 75% likely to be not spam, whereas "V!@G.RA" is 100% likely to be spam.

    17. Re:Sheeeeesh! by SeregonSandgrain · · Score: 0

      He has no debt.
      He has "free" memberships at hundreds of porn sites.
      He has a bunch of decks of cards with Iraqis on them.
      He has an "authentic 9/11 flag".
      He has a bunch of commemoritive coins.

      Those are the first 5 e-mails in my inbox.
      ASP

      --
      My User Agent: "Where is the pr0n?"
    18. Re:Sheeeeesh! by HalliS · · Score: 1

      I think SpamAssassin needs to start filtering out email that is not written in any language known to mankind

      Here's an example of a letter that got past SA in my university mailbox (see my email above) (I usually never receive spam, but last 5 days I've gotten 3 of them)

      Any Meds U Need. v1@GRa ^ V@1|um % x@nax # V/1codin Pnte.r.min . :S:oma gxbxnsaligqw

      X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_30,FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO, HABEAS_SWE,HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG,MIME_HTML_NO_CHAR SET,MIME_HTML_ONLY, RCVD_IN_RFCI,RCVD_IN_SBL autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on #########.is

      All the prescription drugs we supply are manufactured by leading pharmaceutical companies, are sealed to ensure purity and are despatched under plain cover to protect your confidential medical details. On stock: ' Vali/u/m ^ XAN@X $ S+o+ma ) P.n.termin ; V1@gra ; At|`v@n Plus: Ac'yc|0vir, Pr0.z@c, P@xi'l, Bu.sp@r, Ad|.p&x, I0n`am|n, M3ri`dia, X3n.ica|, Amb.i3n, S0n'aTa, F`l3xeril, Ce|3'brex, Fi0ri:c3t, Tram@`do|, U:|tr@m, L3v:|tra, Pr0p`3cia We use encrypted secure server technology. Best prices here. http://www.fifthdimensionrx.biz. "A boy's will is the wind's will, The vessel in its strength; And my youth comes back to me. And the verse of that sweet old song,


      NOW WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS SUPPOSED TO MEAN? AND WHAT'S WITH THE POEM AT THE END? (FYI, I received another one similar to this one about 11 hours later, and the hits status had gone from -0.5 to 4.5)

      --


      My other UID is 1337
    19. Re:Sheeeeesh! by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      Well, no worries about killing a filter yet, as that mail was on my Yahoo account that's become a spam-trap - Yahoo's (free) spam filtering is basically useless, as even the folder for "normal" mail gets about 200 spams a week or so. I should just close it, but it's the first mail account I ever had, and i've become somewhat attached to it :)

      Thanks for pointing that out, anyway, as i'd been wondering....Seems like every spam I get these days has 3 or 4 lines of completely random words at the bottom.

    20. Re:Sheeeeesh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      many people do forms of this: off the top of my head if you are going to send someone a passwd via email, would you highlight its existance like this?

      password = qwerty

      or would you obfuscate it, so a hacker would not catch it being relayed.

      p4sswrd - qwerty

      i know which i choose and the user never was confused. They change the passwd as soon as they get it.

    21. Re:Sheeeeesh! by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      AND WHAT'S WITH THE POEM AT THE END?

      Look at the headers, and report it to http://www.habeas.com/report/.

      Basically, from what I've been able to gather, Habeas sells software that adds a haiku to your bulk e-mail to make it less likely to be blocked by spam filters, then adds special headers to make the message easy to identify. They sell the software to people who agree NOT to use it for spam, but only for legitimate (solicited) bulk e-mail. The term they use is "sender-warranted e-mail", i.e. the sender warrants that the message is not spam.

      Not sure how effective their strategy is, but it's not a bad idea. The problem is, some spammer has gotten ahold of the Habeas software, and is using it to spam viagra/pharmacy crap. Habeas is trying to put a stop to this, but hasn't been able to so far.

      I set up a filter to mark every message containing the Habeas headers in a particular color. In the past few months, I haven't seen any legitimate mail containing the Habeas headers - only viagra/pharmacy spam. That doesn't mean Habeas isn't legit, only that I don't get mail from their customers, I guess.

      Anyone know more about Habeas and can add anything?

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    22. Re:Sheeeeesh! by CTachyon · · Score: 1

      The concept behind Habeas is that the poem is copyrighted, and anyone who attaches the poem to their mail without permission (e.g. when spamming) is violating copyright law and open to a lawsuit. However, since the legal system is so glacial, Habeas is getting abused so heavily these days that it's pretty much useless.

      To make SpamAssassin ignore Habeas entirely, edit /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf (or your system's equivalent) and add the line score HABEAS_SWE 0 to the end.

      --
      Range Voting: preference intensity matters
  18. WTF? by dwyn · · Score: 1

    Today's date... not April Fool's day.
    Web site... the Wall Street Journal, not the Onion.

    I'm stumped.

    1. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not exactly convinced by this...

      Sounds like a fluff story, and we know how poorly things like this get verified... (think of the 'ban DHMO' article...)

      I'm not exactly convinced that this isn't a hoax... I mean, no one here appears to have verified the story at all, and all I see are knee-jerk reactions...

  19. Doesn't this seem like a put-on? by tkrotchko · · Score: 1

    Its almost like a reality show were they've tweaked things up a bit for TV.

    This is an average joe and his wife that are suddenly famous ... maybe by a bit a of acting? Because nobody is really that naive.

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
    1. Re:Doesn't this seem like a put-on? by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Its almost like a reality show were they've tweaked things up a bit for TV.

      This is an average joe and his wife that are suddenly famous ... maybe by a bit a of acting? Because nobody is really that naive.

      Never met an optimistic person, have you? Pretty much everyone on Slashdot is cynical, but I've actually met people who are cut from almost the same cloth as Will Rogers. They're truly amazing people without anything bad to say or negative aspersions to cast on others. You'd probably meet Mr. Soto and think he's one of the nicest, most at peace people you've ever met.

      He'd have to be, wouldn't he?

      If Ralsky or Richter were in front of me it would be only a matter of hours until my arraignment.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Doesn't this seem like a put-on? by gregoryb · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I don't think so. This could very well be completely true. This guy is a habitual impulse buyer. He's addicted to buying stuff and it evidently gives him a thrill to do so.

      I've known several people that were addicted to buying things like this, only they did it at the mall, or pawn shops, or thrift stores, etc. I had a friend who's parents bought stuff all the time. Their house was stacked high with junk they never used or even touched again after it was purchased. They literally had to move large piles of random things whenever they wanted to sit on the couch, eat at the table, or do most anything in the house.

      If you're addicted to this extent, what better place to feed your addiction than the internet and specifically, your email box? There are thousands of things pitched to you every day (maybe every hour!) no matter what you're doing on the net.

      Just like every other media outlet, it screams "YOU NEED MORE STUFF!"... but I digress. :-)

    3. Re:Doesn't this seem like a put-on? by kiolbasa · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The whole article seems a bit phony. Especially the use of the word "anti" by Mr. Soto. There is one group of people who are fond of using the word "anti" to describe those who dislike spam. I get a strong feeling that this is not just some innocent guy that likes to buy from spam, and his admission of spamming once before leaves me even more suspicious.

      --

      Beer wants to be free
    4. Re:Doesn't this seem like a put-on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's there to be suspicious of? That there's somebody out there that buys from spam adverts? I think everybody realizes that already. Even if this guy were a shill of some sort it wouldn't change the fact that X% of people buy from spam adverts, and Y% of people don't see anything wrong with spam.

    5. Re:Doesn't this seem like a put-on? by pilkul · · Score: 1

      Yeah, what struck me as especially strange was that he kept enthusing about all the "bargains" he got from spam. My understanding was that spammers were mostly scammers who either send you crap products or don't send them at all. But here he is claiming he got nice things like cheap computer parts from spam. Really? My spam doesn't generally advertise anything nearly so useful. It's hard not to suspect that this guy is a spammer trying to increase the appeal of spam.

    6. Re:Doesn't this seem like a put-on? by JuggleGeek · · Score: 1
      There is one group of people who are fond of using the word "anti" to describe those who dislike spam.

      No, there are two groups. Spammers use it, and so do anti-spammers. I'm an anti-spammer.

      Overall, I agree with you. He's a self-admitted spammer, and it sounds like he's just doing PR work. Not too bright, that - spammers do better when they hide like cockroaches. They can't live in the light of day.

  20. it's a sad day by Triumph+The+Insult+C · · Score: 3, Funny

    i'm a christian, and the only feeling i have towards him is not compassion, but wanting to beat some ever-living sense into him. sorry jc

    --
    vodka, straight up, thank you!
    1. Re:it's a sad day by BgJonson79 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but that's only if Jesus doesn't want to take His shots first.

      --

      There are four boxes used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order.

    2. Re:it's a sad day by 1c3m4n85 · · Score: 1

      talk about it. This guy needs to find something better to do with his borrowed time. I'd hate to be a tech support rep @ his ISP!

    3. Re:it's a sad day by dcollins · · Score: 1

      Seen Mel Gibson's new movie recently, have we?

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    4. Re:it's a sad day by Triumph+The+Insult+C · · Score: 1

      no. don't plan on it either. i'll probably watch it when it hits dvd though.

      is there something wrong with being christian (aside from being one and posting on /.), and, does being christian mean one has to see his movie? here, i will finish your stereotype up for you. are you jewish?

      --
      vodka, straight up, thank you!
    5. Re:it's a sad day by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      Nothing wrong with being Christian, no. Just be aware that the geek crowd (myself included) tends away from "traditional" religious groups. It's a combination of being very logical, and rebellious, I think.

      If you point out your religion, some yahoo here will take a cheap shot just because they are anonymous and can. Sucks, but 'tis the truth.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
  21. Pharmaceuticals by bendelo · · Score: 1

    He buys spam-pitched aromatherapy oils for his wife and pharmaceuticals for himself.

    I wonder if his wife benefits from these pharmaceuticals...

  22. buy pr0n sites? by WaterTroll · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Nothing about his activites seemed very interesting until I read this part:

    He says he purchased two pornography Web sites, again via spam, and ran them for a while, but then he decided they weren't worth the trouble and disabled them.

    Spam that advertises buying and managing for porn sites? What?!

    1. Re:buy pr0n sites? by Operating+Thetan · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      AFAIK, most AVS's have a franchised business structure-they provide free hosting and content, you provide design. There's probably someone building shitloads of FreeAmazingDeluxeAdultKeyPassCheck sites and then transferring the ownership via spam

      --
      Worried you might not keep your virginity forever? Try new Linux(TM), guaranteed twice as effective as LARPing
  23. Remember... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This summer, when its hot outside, and your hemmoroids
    gets even hotter, just look to the cool relief of
    Preparation-H to get you on your way.

  24. Simple Pleasures for Simple Minds by Necrobruiser · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This guy's just as happy as if he had a brain, isn't he?

    --
    "I planned within my means and got a fixed rate mortgage, so where's MY bailout?" -cafepress
  25. does he realise? by DanArgent · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wonder if he realizes that he is making life harder for everyone else. Most people that I talk to despise spam. Like the artical said, it wouldn't survive unless someone paid money for it. He might be getting enjoyment form it but he is causing other people pain.

  26. You did miss something by ktulu1115 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well this is somewhat related to the second, but I bet his Nigerian friend helped him bring in a few extra thousand a month.

    --
    # fuser -v /dev/attention | grep work
    #
  27. OMG...he is evil...must be destroyed... by laddhebert · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    yeah...destroyed...

    -L

    --
    Don't Panic.
  28. Spam and legitimate business do not mix by PingKing · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The problem I would have with buying *anything* from a spam email is the fact that the company has resorted to spam to pitch their wares. To me, it always smells of desperation and contempt for the customer.

    In the current anti-spam climate, a company cannot use spam to market themselves and be seen as a professionally-run organisation.

    --

    Patriotism - the last resort of scoundrels.
    1. Re:Spam and legitimate business do not mix by intertwingled · · Score: 1

      That's strange. Most television commercials smell of desperation and contempt for the customer. Especially those god damned infomercials, which take up airtime that used to be reserved for McHale's Navy and Perry Mason reruns! Grrr. There are some commercials that are actually funny and therefore worth the air time, but 99.99% of them sound like they are screaming at me or are duller than ditchwater.

      --
      -- SKYKING, SKYKING, DO NOT ANSWER.
    2. Re:Spam and legitimate business do not mix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like this guy needs a whack upside the head with a clue stick.

      I'm not against advertising, but I cannot consider spam legitimate advertising for several reasons:

      1) Legitimate advertising costs the manufacturer/producer money to create and distribute. Spam mail has no real production cost to the spammer involved when you consider it may actually only cost about 25.00 to compose the spam and send out 2 million copies.

      2) Legitimate advertising does not cost me any money. Sure, it can be a pain gathering the real snail mail from the brochures, but there is no increased postal costs involved to me. The ads are paid for by the distributor at bulk mail rates. Spam involves the ISP, who passes on the increases handling costs to the consumer (me).

      3) Legitimate advertising uses the existing legitimate channels of production and distribution. This makes for a healthy economic environment, jobs and paychecks for multiple entities. Spam quite often comes from hacked machines, where an open relay mail server is activated without the owners permission, and quite often their knowledge. Other sources include illegaly hijacked legitimate mail servers. While some may argue that the admins should have locked it down tighter, the same argument may be made to the owner of a house whose lock did not keep out a burgler. The distribution of spam involves criminal activity which adds costs to the tax paying segment of society through increased legal investigations.

      4) Legitimate advertising includes legitimate products obtained from legitimate contacts. They make their profit by supplying the products advertised (for the most part, though there are exceptions - caveat emptor ). Spam, more often than not, has no legitimate contact; instead, the profits come from ad revenues on web sites based on fee per hit rate. By including ad graphics from web urls into the message, they get paid wether or not you ever buy from them. (this is one reason I read mail in text format only - I don't want to give spammers their $0.10 by simply hilighting a message to delete it).

      There are legitimate needs for online advertising, but it is incumbent on the advertisers/manufacturers to accept the responsibility of cost, and allow the consumers the freedomn to not receive the mail if they so desire. Presently, the usual usage of the 'opt out' link in an email only alerts the spammer to the legitimacy of a specific email address.

    3. Re:Spam and legitimate business do not mix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All advertising is "desperation and contempt for the customer". The damn stuff is everywhere, clogging my mailbox, cluttering the streets and roadways, and totally 0WNing TV. Ban it all, spam included, and I'll be happy.

  29. Big Deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Big Deal. Some people also like making money off banner ads on a "Nerds' News Site" that just copies everyone else's newsfeeds and makes their members do the rest of the work.

    It's sad how it just promotes digital laziness.

  30. Too late to castrate him by arivanov · · Score: 1

    He is already a grandfather. Bummer...

    --
    Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
    http://www.sigsegv.cx/
  31. So what is this guy's email address??!! by clickety6 · · Score: 0, Redundant


    I have this bridge, you see...

    --
    ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
  32. Hypocrisy? by PincheGab · · Score: 5, Insightful
    So in the name of freedom, we should suppress freedom?

    If the guy wants to buy from spammers, let him. We have to fight spam from another angle, not by supressing people's rights to do stupid things.

    1. Re:Hypocrisy? by theLOUDroom · · Score: 2

      If the guy wants to buy from spammers, let him. We have to fight spam from another angle, not by supressing people's rights to do stupid things.

      Yes, why should we judge people who financially support those who commit FRAUD? After all, we can all to say whatever we want, even if it's not true right?
      WRONG

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    2. Re:Hypocrisy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm starting to think this freedom thing is overrated. The world would be a better place if I was allowed to take a baseball bat, go around whacking people, and ordering them to stop being stupid.

    3. Re:Hypocrisy? by betelgeuse-4 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "...not by supressing people's rights to do stupid things."

      So we shouldn't suppress peoples "right" to do something stupid, like... say, drink 8 pints of beer then drive a 4 tonne truck whilst reading a newspaper and combing their hair.

      People buying stuff from spam has consequences for the rest of us. The most obvious being that we also recieve increasing amounts of spam. There may also be a link between spam and criminal gangs (however, I can't provide hard evidence for this).

    4. Re:Hypocrisy? by PincheGab · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yes, why should we judge people who financially support those who commit FRAUD?

      You pursue fraud from a criminal fraud point of view (ie, investigate the defrauder and prosecute), not by preventing the poor idiot from buying into the fraudulent idea.

    5. Re:Hypocrisy? by PincheGab · · Score: 1
      So we shouldn't suppress peoples "right" to do something stupid, like... say, drink 8 pints of beer then drive a 4 tonne truck whilst reading a newspaper and combing their hair.

      And this is exactly why we have laws that limit our rights. Don't compare apples and oranges, it takes away from the point you are trying to make.

    6. Re:Hypocrisy? by quisph · · Score: 2, Interesting
      So in the name of freedom, we should suppress freedom?

      If the guy wants to buy from spammers, let him.

      Who's trying to stop him?

      There's a big difference between suppressing THEIR freedom to send spam, and suppressing HIS freedom to respond to it. No one is seriously pursuing the latter.

      If he wants spam, he is free to OPT-IN. The rest of us should be left alone.

    7. Re:Hypocrisy? by PincheGab · · Score: 1

      LOL, you caught me. I was responding to the sublime insinuation in the original post that this guy should have something nasty done to him for responding to spam.

    8. Re:Hypocrisy? by quisph · · Score: 1

      It must have been edited, because I can't see any such suggestion.

    9. Re:Hypocrisy? by kkirk007 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      He's supporting something that has recently been made illegal. (CAN-SPAM)

      Now he's not aiding and abetting, but he is encouraging and promoting. Should we stop someone from encouraging illegal activity?

      If an eight year old comes up to you, cigarette in mouth, and asks for a light, is it okay to lend him your lighter?

      I think both ideas...children smoking, and idiots spamming, are equally reprehensible and should be discouraged.

    10. Re:Hypocrisy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So we shouldn't suppress peoples "right" to do something stupid, like... say, drink 8 pints of beer then drive a 4 tonne truck whilst reading a newspaper and combing their hair.

      Sure. Let him do it all he wants. Just not on public roads.

    11. Re:Hypocrisy? by dillee1 · · Score: 1

      No. Freedom does'nt applies to this situation. You can do whatever you like if your action did'nt affects other ppl. However we all know supporting spammers will cause every other email users' misery. This is just not approapiate to use "freedom" here.

    12. Re:Hypocrisy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So we shouldn't suppress peoples "right" to do something stupid, like... say, drink 8 pints of beer then drive a 4 tonne truck whilst reading a newspaper and combing their hair.

      Not so long as the rest of us have the right to use an anti-tank rocket and blast him and his truck off the road.

      We don't have that right? oh...well, then he shouldn't be able to do that...

    13. Re:Hypocrisy? by dustmite · · Score: 1

      So let him opt-in, and let the rest of us opt-out. And then back that up with legislation and enforcement. Then we have 100% freedom, as we can all decide what we want. Right now we don't have the "freedom" to say 'no' outright to spam.

    14. Re:Hypocrisy? by JuggleGeek · · Score: 1
      He's supporting something that has recently been made illegal. (CAN-SPAM)

      CAN-SPAM doesn't make spam illegal. In fact, it specifically makes spam legal and overrides any state laws (such as California) which had outlawed spam.

    15. Re:Hypocrisy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      people a hobby or kick lets try this I am as the ad mentioned an injured 45 year old constructon worker by day and a web builder by night, a grandfather of four and father of three, when you reach that status in life let mme know halfpint. Furtherore you have created a direct invasion of my privacy and i will do all within power to huny you down and if i can prosecute. Oh by the way this is Mr. Soto incase you didnt know.

    16. Re:Hypocrisy? by JuggleGeek · · Score: 1
      You're going to hunt me down and prosecute because I said that Can-Spam doesn't outlaw spam? Good luck.

      Here, since you seem a bit on the slow side, let me help. Try visiting www.whitis.com. That's me. I'm not hiding.

  33. A man I can do business with by Spunky_Monkey · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Anyone know this gey's email address? He seems just the kind of person I need to help me transfer $500000 from the deceased king of Nigeria's personal bank account...

  34. Sounds fishy by dhclab49 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How does a guy earning $40k per year have a 2 bedroom apartment in Midtown Manhattan?

    1. Re:Sounds fishy by WaterTroll · · Score: 1

      doesn't say what his wife does for a living.

    2. Re:Sounds fishy by flying_monkies · · Score: 1

      Probably part of his compensation package, since he works for an apartment management firm. Article states he got hooked after he had to stop buying at flea markets... I'm guessing he's either suffering from Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (buys a ton of garbage that he'll never use) or looking for a Jared and Subway kinda deal from the spammers.

      --
      I disagree with what you say, but I'll defend your right to say it to the death - Voltaire
    3. Re:Sounds fishy by WaterTroll · · Score: 1

      oh whoops. she runs an aromatherapy business

    4. Re:Sounds fishy by vorwerk · · Score: 4, Funny

      How does a guy earning $40k per year have a 2 bedroom apartment in Midtown Manhattan?

      He replied to one of the "Earn $10k a week, at home, in your spare time" spams :)

    5. Re:Sounds fishy by cyranoVR · · Score: 1

      He probably lives in a rent-controlled apartment.

      Also, there are more neighborhoods in Manhattan than the Upper West Side. If you are willing to deal with foot-long rats and drug dealers, you can get some pretty good deals.

    6. Re:Sounds fishy by thx2001r · · Score: 1

      Not to mention, he (somehow) has money left over to shovel hundreds, if not thousands into spam related purchases per year?

      Is he secretely married to Paris Hilton (perhaps as a result of a great spam offer) and just leeching off of her family's $$$ ?

      --

      -Joe
      If we're all god's children, what's so special about Jesus? - Jimmy Carr

    7. Re:Sounds fishy by stratjakt · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, reading the article, it's not an OCD thing. He doesnt respond to every spam. Most of the things listed in the articles that he purchased are used. There is mention of a humidifier/AC unit that's unused, but the error of omission is probably because it's WINTER and it hasn't been installed yet.

      A lot of people enjoy shopping, browsing around garage sales, flea markets, etc.. A lot of elderly or disabled people like to watch the Shopping Network, use eBay, and are the people targetted by spam.

      The article, and slashbots, go out of their way to make him look like some sort of retard or dupe. But there's nothing wrong with him. He likes bargain hunting. He hurt his back, so he does it through the internet.

      Article even mentions he turned a profit reselling the stuff online.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    8. Re:Sounds fishy by DavidHumus · · Score: 1
      2 words: Rent Control.

      Someone I know pays only a few hundred dollars for a 2-bedroom in midtown.

    9. Re:Sounds fishy by mec · · Score: 1

      He doesn't live on the Upper West Side; he lives in "Midtown Manhattan", which is just as pricy.

      You're probably right about the rent control. He probably got a sweetheart deal on the apartment.

    10. Re:Sounds fishy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      >>How does a guy earning $40k per year have a 2 bedroom apartment in Midtown Manhattan?

      Easy. His wife makes $160k being one of those Meet Horny and Bored Wives in Your Area.

    11. Re:Sounds fishy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He earns millions of dollars helping Nigerian politicians transfer money out of the country, of course!

    12. Re:Sounds fishy by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      He stopped going to flea markets after he "hurt his back". I'm guessing that he's one of those people who got some kind of monsterous settlement from whoever coud be blamed for his "back pain"... That money could've been invested wisely (based on a spam message, no doubt), and the divdends are paying for his compulsive buying habits.

      That's my theory, anyway.

    13. Re:Sounds fishy by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 2, Informative
      Section 8! He's one of the "Lucky Duckies" the Wall Street Journal loves to talk about.

      (I agree with the WSJ on this, but I couldn't link to a WSJ page because it's a paid subscription. You'll have to read about it in another newspaper. According to the Journal, "Lucky Duckies" are the non- or low-taxpaying class. Some guy who's the head of household making $40K a year doesn't pay much taxes.)

    14. Re:Sounds fishy by orac2 · · Score: 1

      The article notes that he works for a real estate management company: he was probably able to land a sweet deal in one of their buildings, or just a sweet deal in general, being a real estate insider.

      --
      "Just once, I'd like to meet an alien menace that wasn't immune to bullets." -- The Brigadier, Dr. Who
    15. Re:Sounds fishy by Doofus · · Score: 1

      Two words: Rent Control.

      --
      If the Government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; ... it invites anarchy. - Brandeis
    16. Re:Sounds fishy by wolf- · · Score: 1

      Good Question.
      I'm trying to find a sublet for June and July in the Hell's kitchen area, and Studios are starting at $1500-$2000 furnished.

      2 bedrooms run closer to $3000 a month for the nice ones.

      --
      ----- LoboSoft specializes in Digital Language Lab
    17. Re:Sounds fishy by Politburo · · Score: 1

      iirc, 40K is way too much to be eligible for Section 8. I seem to recall a segment on WNYC that mentioned 23K.

    18. Re:Sounds fishy by fermion · · Score: 3, Funny

      Haven't you been watching tv for the past 10 years. Anyone can get a wonderful apartment in Manhattan, with bedrooms and large kitchens, and never have to work! All you need are acquantances.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    19. Re:Sounds fishy by Marvin_OScribbley · · Score: 1

      Haven't you been watching tv for the past 10 years. Anyone can get a wonderful apartment in Manhattan, with bedrooms and large kitchens, and never have to work! All you need are acquantances.

      See, no one ever told you life was gonna be this way.
      Your job's a joke, you're broke, and you have a two bedroom Manhattan apartment!

      --
      I'm not a journalist, but I play one on slashdot
    20. Re:Sounds fishy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same way Carrie Bradshaw buys $100k worth of shoes and clothing while making $45k as a writer.

    21. Re:Sounds fishy by cyranoVR · · Score: 1

      he lives in "Midtown Manhattan", which is just as pricy.

      Hmmm...unless you're all the way West (past 10th ave) with the abandonded warehouses and transvestite prostitutes.

      "Hell's Kitchen" is in midtown (although I've heard it's been cleaned up a bit).

    22. Re:Sounds fishy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you. I was thinking the same thing. This article has been fishy/disturbing all from the gecko . From this guy being 45 years old and a grandaddy to living in midtown with a 40K salary and still has money to piss away!!!!

      Then again, with his wife's implants who knows what kind of money she makes on the side ;)

    23. Re:Sounds fishy by Tin+Foil+Hat · · Score: 1

      To play the devil's advocate, the guy is 45 years old. It's quite possible he's had the same apartment for will over ten years. Perhaps he has a cheaper rent than most in the area, or even owns it outright. Maybe it's a really small shithole apartment two levels below the street. That would be appropriate.

      --
      No matter how many of my rights are taken away, somehow I still don't feel safe. -Frigid Monkey
    24. Re:Sounds fishy by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      He's a 'tard:
      Mr. Soto says he has made very little money on these spam-inspired business ventures. "I wish I did," he says, adding that he doesn't have time to design all the Web sites required to resell stuff. "I buy it and then three weeks later it sits there," he concedes. "I do a lot of impulse buys."

      He buys all that crap intending to resell it, but never gets around to it.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    25. Re:Sounds fishy by benedict · · Score: 1

      Those foot-long drug dealers are a real pain.
      Step on one accidentally and next day his mates
      set your house on fire.

      --
      Ben "You have your mind on computers, it seems."
    26. Re:Sounds fishy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those friendly Nigerians helped him out.

    27. Re:Sounds fishy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's bogus. OCD comes in a variety of flavors. Who made you the authority on it? How can you say someone doesn't have it when you haven't met them and you aren't some type of doctor? It sounds to me like he has it.

  35. The best part by Beek · · Score: 1

    There is one thing that makes this article incredibly redeeming: the artist's rendering of Mr. Soto. http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/images/Soto _Orlando-GE05203142004203138.gif

  36. Only 17 spam emails? by clickety6 · · Score: 1

    What good are these email harvesters? I have never bought anyhting from a spam message and I get 100s. This guy is a serial buyer and gets 17!?! Somebody isn't doing a very good job and supplying useful email addresses!!

    --
    ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
  37. We should encourage spam buying by pyser · · Score: 5, Funny

    According to the article it takes one buyer out of 15,000 e-mails sent in order to break even. If more people would buy from spam, they'd have to send out fewer e-mails to break even, right?

    1. Re:We should encourage spam buying by pyser · · Score: 1

      Oops, one per 10,000 e-mails. Sorry

    2. Re:We should encourage spam buying by TiMac · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Uhhh....

      And if most everyone in the world bought Windows licenses, Microsoft wouldn't need to charge as much for them.....oh wait....everyone DOES buy them, and MS wants to MAKE MONEY.

      --

    3. Re:We should encourage spam buying by tanguyr · · Score: 1

      Oops, one per 10,000 e-mails. Sorry ...which, combined with the fact that half the people you meet have an IQ under 100, is why spam exists.

      --
      #!/usr/bin/english
    4. Re:We should encourage spam buying by Marc+Desrochers · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And what business do you know aims to break even? People go into business to make money, as is certainly the case with spammers. If they get more people to buy, they will spam more.

    5. Re:We should encourage spam buying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I am guessing that you are one of those people on the lower half. While IQ scoring is regularly adjusted so that half the population falls below 100 it is not likely that most slashdotters meets a representative sampling of the population. I personally work with mostly professionals with bachelors and masters degrees.

    6. Re:We should encourage spam buying by tanguyr · · Score: 1

      Well I am guessing that you are one of those people on the lower half.

      Indeed. My IQ is negative.

      --
      #!/usr/bin/english
    7. Re:We should encourage spam buying by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1

      Indeed. My IQ is negative.p Sounds like the same problem I have. Darn that numeric overflow. :-)

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    8. Re:We should encourage spam buying by ChuyMatt · · Score: 1

      ***PSSSST!!! is'sa Joke***

    9. Re:We should encourage spam buying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not everyone buys Windows licenses.

      Hell, in China they're having a hard time getting people to buy them. Why buy when the local software store has them for pennies on the dollar?

  38. Real vs "Scam" Spam? by FreemanPatrickHenry · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'd be interested to see how often he pays for something he never receives...

    --
    I have discovered a truly marvelous .sig which, unfortunately, this space is too small to contain.
  39. demographic? by Matey-O · · Score: 2, Insightful

    _45_ year old, _smoking_, _grandfathers_ with more discretionary income than sence.

    Will make MILLIONS, boys! MILLIONS!

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    1. Re:demographic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sence

      I see you're already honing your spammer spelling skills.

  40. Stupid.. by Pragmatix · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The stupid thing about this article is you can buy all that crap and find all of those deals on the internet without having to wade through piles of spam.

    So basically all this guy needs to do is google for aromatherapy or cheap newports and he will probably get better prices than he is getting now.

  41. Entire text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    For Orlando Soto,
    No Day Is Complete
    Without Some Spam
    Lovers of Unsolicited E-Mail
    Keep Industry Afloat;
    'It's Like a Treasure Hunt'

    By MYLENE MANGALINDAN
    Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

    NEW YORK -- Orlando Soto looks forward each evening to spending time on his home computer after work. But when he logged on one Wednesday night last month, he was disappointed: There were 17 spam e-mail messages waiting for him.

    "Only 17," he lamented, scrolling through them. "That's a very light day."

    Mr. Soto routinely comes home to some 150 e-mail pitches, and he loves getting them all. The 45-year-old grandfather opens most of them. He answers spam questionnaires. And he buys stuff pitched in spam e-mail -- again and again. "Everyday people call it spam," says Mr. Soto, who prefers calling it "unsolicited" e-mail. "But I'm open to everything."

    If everyone hated spam, it would disappear. But like the traditional direct-mail marketers and telemarketers who came before them, spammers survive public outrage, filters, lawsuits and regulations because innumerable times a day, somebody, somewhere responds with money.

    One such somebody is Mr. Soto. He buys spam-pitched aromatherapy oils for his wife and pharmaceuticals for himself. His bookcases are lined with first-edition mystery novels he bought via spam. In a corner of his two-bedroom midtown-Manhattan apartment stands an antique pinball machine bought via spam. He plays Internet bingo at five cents a game on a Web site pitched to him by spam a few weeks ago. He buys stuff via spam for himself and to resell on Web sites he sets up -- a business idea he got from a spam pitch.

    Spam helps him "unwind" and "lose the stress of the day," Mr. Soto says.

    He's the kind of person spammers love: a serial buyer. He says that he sometimes spends hundreds of dollars a week buying via spam. Most spam responders are one-time customers, e-mail marketers say, so repeaters make all the difference. Scott Richter, who runs a mass e-mailing company called Optinrealbig.com LLC in Westminster, Colo., says about a fifth of those who order his vitamins and other products buy again. "Those repeat buyers help generate a bulk of the revenue," he says.

    There must be a lot of Mr. Sotos out there. In a survey by MailShell, a San Francisco antispam company, 8% of respondents said they have bought products via spam. Spammers say that percentage is probably low because many people are too embarrassed to admit responding to spam.

    Spammers say they typically need just one buyer per 10,000 spam messages to break even. Mr. Soto recently spent more than $100 on vitamins from a spam pitch that touted: "Buy 1, get 2 free, plus free shipping!" If this particular solicitation was typical, spam experts say, the spammer probably sent it to about five million people with a commission of about 30%. If 500 buyers averaged spending what Mr. Soto spent on the vitamins, the spammer would bring in about $15,000 in revenue from the mailing.

    Mr. Soto's daily spamfest starts after he gets home from his $40,000-a-year job as a building supervisor at NYRE Management, a real-estate firm that runs Manhattan apartment buildings. After dinner with his wife, he sits down in the leather chair in his home office and starts opening spam. He typically goes through 50 spam pitches before he finds one that's enticing, he says. He then pores over the pitches he has culled, winnowing them down to the must-haves.

    On the recent Wednesday evening, Mr. Soto quickly reviewed the contents of his six e-mail accounts. "See, this is unsolicited," he said, pointing his cursor at a pitch aimed at mom-and-pop companies: "AOL Small Business News." He gave it some thought but decided it was from too big a company; he prefers spam from smaller purveyors. "No," he pronounced, skipping to the next spam: "Hi, Date Number 868." A boring adult-related pitch, he decided before moving on. The next was a pitch for mortgages, which he doesn't need.

    "

  42. I really don't see a problem here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This guy likes to save money, and he reads his unsolicited email and then selectively buys from it. SO FUCKING WHAT? I like looking for used cds and books on amazon and for bargins on ebay. It's not like this guy is a hacker or a child pornographer or something. Why don't you people get a job and leave honest, hard working people be!

    1. Re:I really don't see a problem here. by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      "This guy likes to save money"

      did you read the article? he spends "hundreds of dollars" each WEEK on crap and "pharmaceuticals".

      I say this guy likes to spend money.

  43. waitaminit... by nomoreself · · Score: 2, Funny

    "It offered Newports -- his brand -- for $2.85 a pack, about a third of what he pays at a corner store near his home."

    The man is paying $8.50 for a pack of Newports. I think that pretty much sums it up.

    1. Re:waitaminit... by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 1
      The man is paying $8.50 for a pack of Newports. I think that pretty much sums it up.
      NY and NYC have very hefty cigarrette taxes.
    2. Re:waitaminit... by buysse · · Score: 1

      New York taxes cigs a wee bit. There's apparently a healthy black market for tobacco there. ;)

      --
      -30-
    3. Re:waitaminit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously don't live in NYC. (or do but don't smoke)

      8.50 is about right in NYC these days.
      Find an addict, get them hooked, raise taxes like mad.

    4. Re:waitaminit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's apparently a healthy black market for tobacco there.

      Wouldn't it just be awful if NY State cigarette tax authorities took an interest in this...er...(waste of food & oxygen!) person? Just terrible...
      me

  44. Easy solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Please, someone introduce this guy to ebay.

    Apprarently it's his substitute for "rummage sales" which he no longer goes to after injuring his back. I'm sure there are better online alternatives.

    1. Re:Easy solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't read, eh?

      "...He became an eBay devotee, staying up late to bid on software, self-help business tapes and other items. Soon he began buying via spam as well..."

    2. Re:Easy solution... by chrisbtoo · · Score: 1

      Please, someone introduce this guy to ebay.

      Good call. I just got mail from this guy saying you could make millions with an ebay-based business!

      So long, suckers!

      --
      Registering accounts later than some other chrisb since 1997
  45. Details? by ParadoxicalPostulate · · Score: 2, Insightful


    Right, but what was their n value? Where did they conduct the survey? Did they include a variable mix of people? Were their surveys limited to a particular geographic region or cultural group?

    I can't seem to find the survey on MailShell...anybody having better luck? I did a domain search through Google but no luck.

    Not challenging the accuracy of the survey outright, but it would certainly help to have a link.

    1. Re:Details? by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      And also, for the study, how did they define "spam"?

      A liberal definition of spam could include legitimate commercial email, such as when TigerDirect mails me their opt-in monthly discount flyer. I have no problem buying from a legitimate commercial sales pitch, but there is absolutely zero chance that I'm going to buy from a spammer who uses deceptive subject lines, a fake "from" address, and fake headers to defeat my email filters.

      Using a more traditional definition of spam (i.e. UCE only) would definately result in a lower percentage of sales than UCE + solicited commercial email. Therefore, without knowing the criteria used in the study, their 8% number is meaningless.

    2. Re:Details? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI, details of the Mailshell survey, per your request.

      http://www.mailshell.com/mail/client/oem2.html/s te p/pr/article/17

    3. Re:Details? by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link, AC. While an interesting survey, it merely proves that 8% of respondants had purchased items from what they believed to be spam, not necessairly from UCE. On the same page, the survey of respondant's definitions of spam showed a wide range, from "any unwanted email", to "Chain letters, virus hoaxes, etc.", to "email sent by companies with a previous business relationship (to paraphrase)".

      I think a case could be made that spam is "any email you don't want", but that is a very subjective definition. On the other hand, there is a clear separation of "unsolicited commercial email" and "solicited commercial email", which is an important distinction both ethically and commercially. It would have been a lot more meaningful if the study could have said, "8% of respondants made purchases from Unsolicited Commercial Email in the past".

  46. he's my role model by GillBates0 · · Score: 2, Funny
    i strive to follow in the footsteps of Orlando Soto. he's my role model. i can only hope that someday i will be as wise and giving as Him. he understands people and gives his most to benefit mankind.

    i'm growing a pony tail now, and trying to imitate his ways. and i would urge everybody else to do the same. maybe some day we will all be as great as He is.

    thank you.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:he's my role model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I already have a pony tail. It didn't seem to suck out my brains the way it did this guy. Sheeesh!

  47. Best quote ever in the Spam Section by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1
    Mr. Soto says he also has bought some adult DVDs and videos via spam, but never got around to marketing them.

    It sounds like he's got his hands full.

    1. Re:Best quote ever in the Spam Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably got his hands full, his wife's hands full and his mouth full... judging by spam I get.

  48. Orlando Soto by rafael_es_son · · Score: 1

    Orlando Soto, today you've made Corporate America proud. Ease away those spoon-fed-by-our-marketing-firm feelings of inadequacy by consuming. What's good for you, is good for the economy!

    Whose economy?

    --"Economists need to learn how to subtract."

    --
    HAD
  49. no email... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but he's listed:

    Soto, Orlando

    325 W 43rd St

    New York, NY 10036-6444

    (212) 399-0626

    1. Re:no email... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize New York is full of Puerto Ricans and Domos? How many Orlando Sotos could there be out there?

  50. The email by Gzip+Christ · · Score: 4, Funny

    I believe the parent is referring to the "Make Penis Fast!" email, for those that haven't read it yet.

  51. The article says... by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 1

    He's a 45-year old grandfather? Now I can see my fiancee's grandparents reading every spam, but they're 70+.

    1. Re:The article says... by colinleroy · · Score: 1

      well, some people have kids quite soon. Simple math, 45 - 20 - 20 > 0, that's quite plausible.

      --
      blah
  52. At least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he works during the day, what would it be if not? On the other hand maybe he works for a spam agency and its his way to stay updated on the latest selling techniques.

  53. robbIE's affinity for $tuff that matter$ junkIEs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we wonder if he knows what he's .contributing to?

  54. I have his phone number... by MoeMoe · · Score: 1

    Did a little... searching, and got his phone number... He's gonna need a second phone line soon. I can't wait to see how much ink toner this guy is gonna get...

    --
    Business \Busi"ness\, n.;
    A scam in which all people involved perceive as beneficial...
    1. Re:I have his phone number... by orlando12 · · Score: 1

      could you email mme his number> pk_105@hotmail.com

  55. After reading the article all I can say is by amichalo · · Score: 2, Informative

    FREAK!!!

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
    1. Re:After reading the article all I can say is by rm007 · · Score: 1, Redundant

      FREAK!!!

      I think the term you were looking for is "sad pathetic freak!!!". Bookmark this page and if you are ever feeling a little down, re-read this and reflect on the sad empty life that this guy leads. He responds to spam as a way to get gratification, sure all impulse shoppers do this, but at some point, you have to wonder if the attraction of spam over surfing for the same trash is that the direct request gives him the impression that some one is paying attention to him, so he responds positively in order to please the attention giver . So very sad, especially when you consider that his actions impose third party costs on all of us by encouraging spammers.

      --


      I've finally got around to changing my sig
  56. My boss responds and forwards spam. by GodBlessTexas · · Score: 1

    Seriously, he forwards spam for everything from natural viagra to radar jammers. And this guy has over 8 figures in assetts. It's insane. I think he's finally starting to notice that he's getting less of it though. He wants to know whereh is ads are.

    --
    Remember the Alamo, and God Bless Texas...
    1. Re:My boss responds and forwards spam. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I forward all of my spam too.

      To uce@ftc.gov

      Then again, I only get about 3 per week.

  57. Sums This Guy Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A 45 year old grandfather who spends his day waiting for junk mail and buying endless crap?

    This guy is official "Desperately Lonely White Trash"

  58. well find out his name and SEND HIM MORE, then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maybe he'll start to see my point of view

  59. From another angle. by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 1

    Just goes to show you that a certain percentage of the consumer market prefers to make their online buying decisions based on "PUSH" marketing on the internet....(SPAM). While the majority claim or prefer the "PULL" method when purchasing online.

    --
    (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
  60. age by Savatte · · Score: 1

    He's 45 years old and a GRANDFATHER?! No wonder he likes spam. Poor judgement in both having kids and his kid(s)having kids at such a young age invariably leads to poor judgements in other aspects.

    1. Re:age by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually if he and his kid both reproduced at 22, that's about the right age. people who wait until they're in their 30s end up having fertility probs.

  61. Spam? by Tuxinatorium · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Spam can't possibly be as funny as this

  62. Buying Vitamins by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    He may be buying vitamins but he obviously isn't taking them. He is clearly half-blind and his mental powers are failing.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  63. ROTFL by The+Saint+(ST) · · Score: 1

    He buys from spam? He consumes even those V*I*A*G*R*A products? And he does business with those Lads from Lagos offering $48,000,000 per transaction? Gee, I prefer to believe in Santa Claus than in this hoax.

    1. Re:ROTFL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you RTFA you'll see that he's still fairly picky about the spam he responds to or buys from.

  64. Orlando Soto is a spammer by dazed-n-confused · · Score: 5, Informative

    See this post on news.admin.net-abuse.email: Orlando Soto sells spamming tools to desperate webmasters. Funny he didn't mention that to the journalist...

    1. Re:Orlando Soto is a spammer by ghamerly · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, he did mention that he has sent spam, in the article. But he says he doesn't do it anymore due to increasing penalties for sending spam.

    2. Re:Orlando Soto is a spammer by mrex · · Score: 5, Informative

      See this post on news.admin.net-abuse.email: Orlando Soto sells spamming tools to desperate webmasters. Funny he didn't mention that to the journalist...

      And double funny that the journalist didn't, you know, do some research and figure this out for himself.

      Basically, the WSJ has through incompetence (at best) given a spamming scammer some free PR, which said spammer naturally used to tell a ceaseless stream of lies in the hopes of spawning more gullible people to relieve of their money. When was the last time you got spammed to buy a pinball machine, anyway?

      Let's take a look at just what Mr. Soto's real connection to spam is:

      In my 20+ years involved with programming and software development, I have never seen a quality collection of software like this made available for sale for such a low price!

      And lemme guess, before you became "involved with programming and software development" you were what, a used car salesman?

      * Instant Unzip - This small, easy to use program walks you step-by-step through the process of Unzipping a ZIP file you have received. A must have utility!

      Wow. Unzip. Truly a must have utility, which is I'm sure why MS built one into their OS.

      * HTML Compressor - Compress the size of your HTML files (web pages) so they take up less space, bandwidth and also so they can't be viewed as easily by others.

      Hard to tell from the description what this is, but could it be the matching ZIP routine to that fancy-schmancy "unzip" thing they're selling you?

      * IP Blocker - Protect yourself against a new type of annoying pop up spam message called IP Ads that can be sent directly to your computer anytime while you are online.

      Darn those "IP Ads"!!! Darn them all to heck!!!

      * HTML Encryptor - Encrypts your web page so it is unreadable by human eyes trying to view the source code. Has various features to protect page elements from theft.

      Awesome. I really must find out how he's managed to develop an encryption algorythm which is already understood by every browser including Netscape 1.1N but which is completely uncrackable by human beings!

      [snip pages of equivalent crap that can be yours for the low low price of $24.95]

      I'd be amused if I weren't so sure at least one person had bought this crap.

    3. Re:Orlando Soto is a spammer by utahjazz · · Score: 4, Informative

      And double funny that the journalist didn't, you know, do some research and figure this out for himself.

      It's herself

      Her name is and her email address are in the article: Mylene Mangalindan mylene.mangalindan@wsj.com.

    4. Re:Orlando Soto is a spammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      * HTML Compressor - Compress the size of your HTML files (web pages) so they take up less space, bandwidth and also so they can't be viewed as easily by others.

      Hard to tell from the description what this is, but could it be the matching ZIP routine to that fancy-schmancy "unzip" thing they're selling you
      I'm sure it is just a filter to remove unrendered whitespace.

      * HTML Encryptor - Encrypts your web page so it is unreadable by human eyes trying to view the source code. Has various features to protect page elements from theft.

      Awesome. I really must find out how he's managed to develop an encryption algorythm which is already understood by every browser including Netscape 1.1N but which is completely uncrackable by human beings!
      I'm sure it's just a setup that uses an externally referenced javascript app to decrypt it - he doesn't say anything about it working in all browsers.
    5. Re:Orlando Soto is a spammer by Politburo · · Score: 1

      The HTML one probably just removes all the whitespace between closing and opening tags.

    6. Re:Orlando Soto is a spammer by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 1

      So, who lives closest to this guy? Anyone? We need someone to volunteer to make the hit.

      --
      We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
    7. Re:Orlando Soto is a spammer by DF5JT · · Score: 0, Troll

      And double funny that the journalist didn't, you know, do some research and figure this out for himself.

      It's herself

      That kind of explains it, doesn't it?

    8. Re:Orlando Soto is a spammer by mrex · · Score: 1

      Though I was of course using the gender neutral form of "himself", I stand corrected. ;)

    9. Re:Orlando Soto is a spammer by el-spectre · · Score: 1
      Awesome. I really must find out how he's managed to develop an encryption algorythm which is already understood by every browser including Netscape 1.1N but which is completely uncrackable by human beings!

      I've seen some pages that appear to be regular text, but are written by some godawful series of obfuscating javascript functions... If you're good enough you could decode it, but it's hard. Kinda a waste of time... if I wanted your design, I could use MSIE's "save html complete" and get an approximate code snapshot... or just code from scratch, it's not that hard.
      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    10. Re:Orlando Soto is a spammer by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      That sounds like WebLockPro, which is the typical snake oil. 2600 had an article (and a Perl decoder) about it in their 20/4 issue.

    11. Re:Orlando Soto is a spammer by mrex · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've seen some pages that appear to be regular text, but are written by some godawful series of obfuscating javascript functions... If you're good enough you could decode it, but it's hard. Kinda a waste of time... if I wanted your design, I could use MSIE's "save html complete" and get an approximate code snapshot... or just code from scratch, it's not that hard.

      Precisely. "Encrypted HTML" is nonsense of the first order -- if a browser can receive, understand, and display a page, it must have access to the source in a form it can parse, which means *you* can parse it, too.

      IANAL, but isn't this guy pretty obviously engaging in deceptive marketing?

    12. Re:Orlando Soto is a spammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HTML Encryptor:

      Most likely creates javascript that will run in any 3.0+ browser and produces HTML. Yes, it will not work in Netscape 1.1 but how many of them do you see around. Believe it or not over 95% of people,and even some web developers, will not be able to figure out how to get source from it.

      IP Blocker.

      Most likely turns off Messenger service.

      Instant Zip.

      Probably VB app that uses Windows API to unzip files.

      Overall, truely awesome application :)

    13. Re:Orlando Soto is a spammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. Unzip. Truly a must have utility, which is I'm sure why MS built one into their OS.

      YOU might think that's pretty basic but just today I was logged into a red-hat machine that did have 'zip' but did NOT have 'unzip'. What bonehead admin set that system up?

  65. You're thinking of Canadians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Canadians are not only all obese and alchoholics, as studies show, but their education levels are far below that of the United States. I believe the latest numbers placed Canadian 10th graders at the same level and American 5th graders.

    So no, it's Canada that you are thinking of.

    1. Re:You're thinking of Canadians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I believe the latest numbers placed Canadian 10th graders at the same level and
      > American 5th graders.

      How do you assess `education levels` then?

  66. Flea Markets, Rummage Sales, 4H by VoidEngineer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Mr. Soto used to haunt rummage sales, thrift shops and flea markets, but he hurt his back in the mid-1990s, so he turned to the Internet.

    That sentence, quoted from the article, describes his entire interest in spam. There are 10 types of people who shop... those who go to flea markets, and those who don't.

    Flea markets, rummage sales, garage sales, yard sales, thrift stores, salvation army stores, craft festivals, 4H fairs, county fairs, state fairs ... These kinds of activities are like crack cocain to certain types of buyers. My aunt used to make crafts that she would sell at the 4H fairs and craft festivals, and she would take me an my cousins to flea markets and rummage sales.

    For those of you who aren't connected, it's a way of life for some people.

    And this guy, because he hurt his back, is merely doing the online version....

    1. Re:Flea Markets, Rummage Sales, 4H by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 2

      And this guy, because he hurt his back, is merely doing the online version....

      I'd posit that eBay is the online version, not buying sh...shtuff from spam. Buying from spam is more like dumpster-diving!

    2. Re:Flea Markets, Rummage Sales, 4H by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I have no objection to anyone going to an on-line rummage/yard sale, I just don't want the rummage/yard sale coming to me.

    3. Re:Flea Markets, Rummage Sales, 4H by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HA ha ha ha ha haaaaaaaa
      Your aunt is white trash!!!
      HA ah ha ha ha hah aha ha ha hah a ha hahaaaa

  67. lart stick by martin · · Score: 0

    Can I have his email so I can sell him a lart stick?

  68. I wonder why... by Zabu · · Score: 1

    Mr. Soto says he also has bought some adult DVDs and videos via spam, but never got around to marketing them.

    Never got around to marketing them. Thats wierd!

    --
    It's all good.
  69. Spam is not soo bad. by Photar · · Score: 1

    Its not as bad as junk snail mail. That stuff kills trees. Not to mention that I regularly get a fake check in the mail that looks very much like my real one.

    --
    He who knows not and knows he knows not is a wise man. He who knows not and knows not he knows not is a fool.
    1. Re:Spam is not soo bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think of all the fossil fuels that are burnt to power these guys computres... Tell me that isnt hurting the nvironment.... som guys even buy specific computesr to do spam... what about all the nasty chemicals used there... HU HU HU HU... punk

    2. Re:Spam is not soo bad. by RichardX · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that I regularly get a fake check in the mail that looks very much like my real one.

      Well, you COULD always try cashing it...

      (Could be an urban legend - too lazy to check Snopes and similar.. it's a good yarn, at any rate, but the guy does seem rather eager to piggyback on the fame his story has brought him, true or not)

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
    3. Re:Spam is not soo bad. by Photar · · Score: 1

      Well, the kind of checks I'm talking about are actual real checks that I could cash, but they're really just loans with about 30% interest rates.

      --
      He who knows not and knows he knows not is a wise man. He who knows not and knows not he knows not is a fool.
  70. Don't be so hard on this man by Eponymous+Cowboy · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I don't believe this man is an idiot. Instead, it sounds like he is suffering from OCD (Obsessive Compulsive Disorder). Specifically, it sounds like a form of hoarding (I hope that link can handle the traffic--Google cache of the main page here), where one simply cannot refuse to buy things that are presented to him or her.

    The Internet, and spam, is just providing an unfortunately convenient way for him to acquire these purchases.

    The article explains that he used to hunt rummage sales, thift stores, and flea markets, then turned to the Internet after hurting his back. He buys on eBay, and via spam. Spam is just one part of his disease, and it made an interesting story. From the tour his wife gave of their apartment, it sounds like he doesn't need most of the stuff he buys--a typical symptom of hoarding.

    Another symptom will be that he is unable to throw away things that he has purchased (like those boxes of vitamins), even if he doesn't need them or they are no longer of value.

    OCD medication is usually ineffective for hoarding, but counseling can help.

    At any rate, he does not respresent a typical email user, but at the same time, he is not alone. It is unfortunate, but there are people with these kinds of disorders out there, and they play right into the hands of spammers and telemarketers. The sad thing is when people take advantage of them.

    --
    It's hard for thee to kick against the pricks.
    1. Re:Don't be so hard on this man by MacAndrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

      thanks for chiming in. perhaps he is just an idiot, perhaps he has a disorder, perhaps he has a disorder AND is an idiot, perhaps neither ... well, point is, one can't know this easily, but the question is worthy.

      facetiousness aside, a lot of people getting willingly nailed by nigerian scams, penis enlargement pitches, and so may have a variety of things going on that dismissal as an idiot does not address. if we want to reduce the behavior and maybe do a little good for the victim, a harder look is often beneficial, and i mean in our day-to-day lives. that jerk brother-in-law might suffer from depression (which causes anxiety, of a flavor that's like being sawn in half), that tardy employee might be an alcoholic, etc. the point is not to give everyone an excuse, but to target the response to the problem and maybe do some good.

      although (ahem) i am enjoying some of the humor here, i hope this guy makes some progress beyond "idiot". granted there are genuine idiots out there (if it's innate do we blame the same as if it is a choice?). i don't mean to medicalize everything, but the ignorance of the "normals" is greater than we realize.

    2. Re:Don't be so hard on this man by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see this guy's credit card bills. How else could he afford to pay for all this crap?

    3. Re:Don't be so hard on this man by chmod000 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I bet you'd settle for just seeing his credit card. Imagine hiding all YOUR purchases in amongst his! He'd never spot them!

      --
      Aptal soru yoktur; sadece merakli aptallar vardir.
    4. Re:Don't be so hard on this man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's really waiting for his big moment of fame from responding to an email that may actually be from Britney Spears...

      1: marry Britney Spears
      2. do ....... ......
      3. do the talk show circuit...
      4. celebrity, fame, fortune, and a role in latest TV show...

    5. Re:Don't be so hard on this man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is an even better example of someone with a similar affliction - though note that I don't particularly buy the DSM categorisations that lump these people together, but there's clearly something wrong with her given that her life is ruled by this stuff - not so sure about Soto, who appears to have it pretty much under control and just have a messy living room (as do I). Would have been interesting to see some photos of the Soto's house for comparison.

    6. Re:Don't be so hard on this man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh he fucking deserves to get fucked, that stupid asshole.

    7. Re:Don't be so hard on this man by Kiyooka · · Score: 1

      I think labels like that do more harm than healing. It just creates a stigma around the person.

      He's just a regular guy that likes to buy stuff. That's it. He's not "suffering" anything. He said he likes it. It relieves daily stress for him, etc. Why should he need any counselling, much less medication? That's almost freaky: a personal hobby is seen as "abnormal behaviour", so pills are given to him to "cure" him of said behaviour?

      Even if he *were* suffering and admitted it and said he couldn't stop himself, such labels would nevertheless do nothing. It's like observing that some guy that likes to steal and you label him a "kleptomaniac".

      Well, why's he considered a 'kleptomaniac"?
      Because he compulsively steals.

      Well, why does he compulsively steal?
      Because he's a kleptomaniac.

      That's why I changed my major from Psychology. imho, it's still too young of a field trying to make up names and labels to develop itself, but is going a bit too far too fast to make itself important.

  71. Re:Really... (Male Enhancement) by adamgreenfield · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't care how much spam he responds to.... it's still cheaper than a Ferrari

    --
    -Adam C. Greenfield
  72. Rats by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 4, Funny

    Unfortunately, since it said he's a grandfather, that means he's already reproduced and passed on his stupidity genes. :-(

  73. Unlike paper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is what I truly feared would happen with spam. Every Sunday my grandmother actually looks forward to sifting through the hord of junk snail mail that comes to her house. Not that she doesn't have a life, just that her life is somehow enhanced by it :-(

  74. Since he doesn't mind unsolicited things... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Everyone, here's his contact info compliments of Superpages...

    Orlando Soto
    325 W 43rd St
    New York, NY 10036
    (212) 399 - 0626

  75. Scammers by haydenth · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised there was no discussion on how many times this guy's been scammed by spammers online? I know a lot of spammers aren't the most legit businessmen.

    --
    - tom -
  76. elderly people reading junk postal mail by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Reminded me of those stories of old people buying hundreds of magazines in order win a million dollars from Ed McMahn. Lonely people do look forward to any sort of contact.

  77. Works the same for drugs by gusmao · · Score: 1
    Just like in the case of drugs, the vast majority of the population is against it, but as long as there are economic incentives for drugdealers (in other words, demand), the problem will never be solved.

    In fact, is even harder to convince spam consumers that they are doing a bad thing, because spam is considered harmless: there is no violence involved, no family breakdowns, no deaths. For all the Sotos in the world, it will always be thought as just another hobbie.

  78. One (possible) exception... by joggle · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'll make one exception: if they add the "ADV: " to the subject line, then I may give them the benefit of the doubt.

    1. Re:One (possible) exception... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1 over-rated? What, has slashdot become some sort of haven for spam apologists?

      Just how does adding "ADV:" to the subject line in ANY way excuse a spammer?

      They still abuse just as much of other people's resources as any other spam message - bandwidth, disk space and cpu. Does it really make a difference if your mailbox overflows with 500 spams with ADV: in the subject versus 500 spams without the extra 4-5 characters? Either way your mailbox has overflowed and "good" messages can't get in either. Just because your email client might find it easy to classify it junk mail doesn't mean that the entire chain up to the very last step where your client retrieves the email is any different, regardless of the content of the spam!

      Everybody knows that slashdot ain't quite the bastion of critical thinking, but this is pretty bad.

    2. Re:One (possible) exception... by JuggleGeek · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Spam with "ADV:" in the subject is still spam.

      However, since I filter anything saying that, doing that is unlikely to end up in my inbox, so it's unlikely that I'll complain about it.

    3. Re:One (possible) exception... by joggle · · Score: 1

      I did say "possible" exception and "may" give... Even with Outlook Express it's trivial to filter out e-mail that starts with ADV and has a valid return address. To me, this is a sign that whoever is sending the spam is at least making the effort to not break the law and make it easy for people to simply ignore it. If the spam is from bzboyz.com then it's still going to get nuked, but if it is from AT&T wireless, then I "might" not hold it against them if it were to happen once or twice in a year.

    4. Re:One (possible) exception... by way2trivial · · Score: 1

      there's an idea...
      Publically post email anywhere you like, with a note "this address has a spam filter that tosses all email unless ADV: is in the subject, if yer a good netmerchant, Im willing to browse..."

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  79. It's sad really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a form of obsession. They have drugs now that can treat this (I'm serious). He needs help. No doubt in a few years he'll be declaring personal bankruptcy.

  80. Does Orlando Soto look familiar... by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 1

    Do the two photographs look similar:

    Orland Soto

    Richard Reid

  81. Hrmm... one entry in the Manhattan phone book. by zippity8 · · Score: 1

    If this isn't the same guy as in the article, I feel sorry for him!

    13 listed living at 325 W 32rd St (apartment?), in Manhattan NY, including one Orlando Soto.
    http://www.smartpages.com/whitepages/index. jhtml?F rom=50stateswp&wpsearch=1&fname=orlando&lname=soto &CityZipAC=Manhattan&State=NY

  82. Blow up Doll! by NetNinja · · Score: 1

    Maybe he will buy himself a blow up doll and that will keep his lonely ass preocupied.

  83. Should read by Thud457 · · Score: 1
    Mr. Soto recently spent more than $100 on "vitamins".

    You know, like those "vitamin" injections JFK's "doctor" used to give him.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  84. In other news by ffoiii · · Score: 1

    In other news, some people are dumb. This is news?

  85. P. T. Barnum had it wrong by kmankmankman2001 · · Score: 1

    He was way off - totally underestimated both the volume and frequency. People like this are proof.

    --
    "The bigger the lie, the more they believe." - Det. Bunk
  86. Ha by Haydn+Fenton · · Score: 1

    "If everyone hated spam, it would disappear"

    Yea, and I'm the queen of england.

  87. What an Idiot! by 1c3m4n85 · · Score: 1

    How stupid does one get!?! This guy needs to get his head out of his arse and find a better hobby

  88. An interesting proposal about why you'd want SPAM by adzoox · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's almost a given that one day soon SPAM will be pretty much eliminated, or at the least, significantly diminished.

    Now, go back in time to: Life Magazines and to older comic books - could there be one day in the future that sellers on eBay pay collector dollar for old Spamvertisements - just like they do for Wrigley's Gum ads, Coke ads, Life magazines, comic book ads?

    I saw in someone's journal that they were collecting SPAM just for posterity sake - to get some good laughs when they were 75. Another was collecting them as a reference database for creating filters.

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
  89. Re:People like him should stay away from the Inter by JoeBaldwin · · Score: 1

    Offtopic? WTF? The parent is right!

    I'm sorry, but people like "Mr Soto" are the ones holding the dicks of the spammers pissing in the collective Internet swimming pool. He should stay away from the Internet, and probably has more spyshit than anyone else.

    "Oooh, these nice people want me to have a purple monkey that TALKS! So cool!"

    "Oooh, they want me to take a survey! I like surveys! And they have a statue! Better help them help me!"

    It's dumb fucks who take the whole Internet advertising thing (or even the whole Internet) as being for their benefit and their benefit only who are destroying it piece by piece.

    Screw him.

  90. How many mortgage loans and enlargers do you need? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're buying from Spam, in reality, you would be buying the same garbage over and over again.

  91. HAH by wtlssndlssfthlss · · Score: 1

    I read this topic, and thought some heroin addict liked processed meat by-products. O_o

    --



    Karma: Terrible
  92. what does his Bayesian corpus look like? by havaloc · · Score: 1

    He's probably the only guy we know that uses Spambayes BACKWARDS. His corpus floats up messages that contain such hot words as mortgage, savings, viagra, etc.

  93. Circle of Spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mr Soto buys products from the spammers then resells them by sending spam!

  94. Why are highly rated comments always sarcastic? by pileated · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This was on the front page of WSJ yesterday so I assume they did some fact checking on it. It wasn't buried in the back of the paper.

    That said, my first reaction, is one I always have: why when an interesting topic comes up: why do I find only sarcastic/hopefully humorous comments get through my level 4 filter? Still waiting for an answer on that.

    I read the article in paper and my reaction was that they did everyone a service by writing about such people. I have no idea why anyone would buy this stuff but the fact of the matter is that spammers wouldn't spam if they didn't make money from it. MS will only change the type of software they make when they don't make money from it. It's a simple, though perhaps unlikeable fact. For every piece of junk that clutters your tv screen, your mailbox or whatever there is a reason for it other than just to bother you (and me!). It's there because someone is making money from it and because someone, like the guy in article, actually buys it.

    I don't think educating such buyers is a reasonable option. Sort of like educating the user of one OS to choose to go to another one. This afternoon I'm going to educate my .NET co-workers to move to Java. I don't think so.

    But the only way to solve a problem is to understand it. The more we understand people like this guy the more likely it is that someone can find a way to direct spam/bad commercials to them and not the rest of us. Maybe a Do Call Me list.

    1. Re:Why are highly rated comments always sarcastic? by iso · · Score: 1

      That said, my first reaction, is one I always have: why when an interesting topic comes up: why do I find only sarcastic/hopefully humorous comments get through my level 4 filter? Still waiting for an answer on that.

      You may want to do what I did: add a "-3" penalty to any slashdot comments moderated as "Funny." As you probably know, the vast majority of "Funny" moderated comments are more annoying than funny, and you won't see them if you assign a penalty to that moderation. Keep in mind you will miss the average 1 geniunely funny joke on slashdot by doing this, but I think it's a small price to pay to make the comments more relevant.

    2. Re:Why are highly rated comments always sarcastic? by Imperator · · Score: 1
      That said, my first reaction, is one I always have: why when an interesting topic comes up: why do I find only sarcastic/hopefully humorous comments get through my level 4 filter? Still waiting for an answer on that.

      I'll give you two:

      1. Because you haven't adjusted your modifiers.
      2. Because moderators give points to posts they like, and they obviously have different preferences than you do.
      --

      Gates' Law: Every 18 months, the speed of software halves.
    3. Re:Why are highly rated comments always sarcastic? by jpkunst · · Score: 1

      That said, my first reaction, is one I always have: why when an interesting topic comes up: why do I find only sarcastic/hopefully humorous comments get through my level 4 filter? Still waiting for an answer on that.

      I don't have an answer for you, but I can tell you this: since I score all 'Funny' mods at -6, reading Slashdot has become much more enjoyable.

      JP

    4. Re:Why are highly rated comments always sarcastic? by pileated · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the advice. Someone else suggested -6 for funny. Either way I think adding the - to funny will make my reading much more enjoyable.

    5. Re:Why are highly rated comments always sarcastic? by KingJoshi · · Score: 1

      Because about everyone on slashdot already knows that there are idiots clicking and buying these things. Whether they're more idiotic than the average person or less is irrelevant, because out of frustration, I call them idiotic. To many here, we joke about this as a recourse. What can we do about them? Educate? No. Legislate? No. So though the topic of spam pains us, we decide to joke about it because it feels better.

      Surely some are also trying to find ways to deal with the problem (filters, challenge system, etc). But most cannot do much more. Some may try to email him or snail mail or whatever. Some might be violent. But for most here, the best is just to make most of this horrid situation we have.

      Also, in terms of dealing with problem of spam, I wonder how much incremental fixes are damaging the situation. I mean, consider you badly injure yourself but don't know it. Maybe something internal and you can't feel it yet. When you start to feel it, it's misdiagnosed and you take pills that slowly treat the pain, but not cure the problem. And the problem worsens but only at an incremental level that increasing doses of your pills handle. You never realize how severe the problem is.

      I would wonder if all the spam filters at the bottom levels and everywhere just stopped, what people would say. I wonder if THEN people would realize how much of a problem it really is. Sure, filtering makes email usable and so forth. But it also hides the real issues that need to be dealt with from the normal people. Their ignorance of the issues do matter. Public outrage makes a big difference and while there is no love for spam, there isn't a level of public outrage which demands action. A level where most ISPs are forced to close open relays, check for authentication, or other methods that are already there and can help, but aren't being done due to laziness or whatever.

      But that's another what if. It won't happen and instead we'll continue to slowly treat this problem but there won't be enough motivation to cure it.

      And me, instead of laughing at the guy or at this state of things, I'll continue to lament how so many people being apathetic causes so many problems and how this knowledge in itself can spur more apathy and cause a vicious cycle.

      --
      In times like these, it is helpful to remember that there have always been times like these. - Paul Harvey
    6. Re:Why are highly rated comments always sarcastic? by pileated · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I will soon be changing all Funny mods to - something or other.

    7. Re:Why are highly rated comments always sarcastic? by corbettw · · Score: 1

      That said, my first reaction, is one I always have: why when an interesting topic comes up: why do I find only sarcastic/hopefully humorous comments get through my level 4 filter? Still waiting for an answer on that.

      You can always edit your preferences so that "Funny" mods get a negative mod to them. A -2 would keep any and all of them from reaching 4, as far as you're concerned.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  95. SPAM vs Ads by More+Trouble · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I hear all about connections between SPAM and organized crime. However, I don't see how SPAM is much different from other forms of information pollution, e.g., ads. For cleaning up email, there's Bayesian filtering. For the web, there's pop-up blockers. For TV, there's Tivo. And in each case the info-polluters have their counter measures.

    :w

  96. Quote from Article by betelgeuse-4 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Mr. Soto says he also has bought some adult DVDs and videos via spam, but never got around to marketing them.

    Yeah right! I wonder if his wife believes him.

  97. This guy is planning ahead by sprior · · Score: 1

    He's just setting up an insanity defense in advance for some super crime he's planning...

  98. i'm more interested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in seeing what his CORPSE looks like

  99. What I don't understand... by gfxguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If so much spam actually finds buyers, why don't any of these people honor opt-outs?

    And if there's really people like Mr. Soto, what's the problem with actually having opt-in?

    --
    Stupid sexy Flanders.
    1. Re:What I don't understand... by plagioclase · · Score: 1

      If so much spam actually finds buyers, why don't any of these people honor opt-outs?

      My guess would be that they figure somewhere down the line they may 'get you', and in the mean time it doesn't cost them anything to leave you in their list, heck, it's probably more convenient to do so.

      And if there's really people like Mr. Soto, what's the problem with actually having opt-in?

      It seems the target market for things like back-alley viagra and enlargement pills are people who are to ashamed to go looking for them, so they're not very likely to bring attention to themselves by opting in.

      Not that I'm saying anything new, but certain products are only really sellable when they're foisted onto people like the snake-oil of old.

      Ick.

      --
      Yeah, I have a webcomic...
    2. Re:What I don't understand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how do you propose they find these opt-ins? If spam is going to come anyway, why would anyone who likes spam have to sign up for spam lists?

      Furthermore, given that sending email has practically no cost, why not send it? Especially if sending it to only opt-ins severely restricts people?

      Yeah, I hate spam too, but be realistic. It's economically viable.

  100. His wife's income . . . by CuriousGeorge113 · · Score: 1

    They did mention that his wife has a work at home business. She probably brings in more cash than he does.

    $40k/year in New York City isn't a whole lot of money. Heck, you can make $100k/yr in New York and just be considered middle class, based on the cost of living.

    Just some random musing.

    --
    No man is an island, But if you take a bunch of dead guys and tie them together, they make a pretty good raft.
    1. Re:His wife's income . . . by plasm4 · · Score: 1

      actually $100k/yr would put you in the middle class bracket in the entire nation. Its just that you can save/invest a lot more living in Indiana than you can living in New York.

    2. Re:His wife's income . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can make $100k/yr in New York and just be considered middle class, based on the cost of living.

      Yeah, until the tax man shows up. Then suddenly you're a member of the "ultra-rich" the democrats are always talking about.

    3. Re:His wife's income . . . by notbob · · Score: 0

      F'ers, 100k/yr is a dream job here in Ohio.

      Hell a raise is a dream job, I'm taking annual pay cuts currently to keep a job.
      Meanwhile my cost of living is skyrocketing in comparison, less spendable cash flow every day of every year.

      I mean really a programmer working full-time should be able to afford a decent house and a BMW or 3.

  101. I've been wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many companies that use spam actually make a profit? Or more to the point, is it really those companies that try and use spam or other unsolicitied email (and the d0rks that buy the products) that keep them in business, or is it those companies that market in selling the addresses and such selling the illusion that it's a profitable business model/strategy?

    Many people today keep saying "that if people stopped buying things from them they'd go away". Does anyone know if a majority or even any but a few of the people who generate spam make a profit? If the idiots buying those address lists, possibly even paying for dummy addresses to send them from and such could be shown that it most likely won't work at the best, maybe more will cut down on it.

    Just a thought.

  102. God, I hate this guy! by fm6 · · Score: 1
    He became an eBay devotee, staying up late to bid on software, self-help business tapes and other items. Soon he began buying via spam as well. ... "I was never anti," he said. "It's like a chase, a treasure hunt."... "I buy it and then three weeks later it sits there," he concedes. "I do a lot of impulse buys."
    Not only does he encourage spammers, he's the guy who pays retail prices for second-hand stuff on eBay, making real bargains impossible to find. He deserves to die!
  103. Does he want to buy a bridge ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    i hear those are quite popular in USA, email me for details, i only sell the genuine ones

  104. Hijacked servers, forged headers, and brute force by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Spammers employ many illegal methods. They forge headers, use other people's servers to send the spam, use other people's real addresses as the sender, they do brute force username dictionary attacks against mail servers, they lie about how they got your address or about your ability to be removed, and finally they sell fake and infringing products (Viagra is a trademark) and are full of frauds and scams. Those are all illegal, or at least they should be. Do you support those things? I doubt it. So how do you propose to only allow "good" spam while blocking this stuff?

  105. his e-mail address by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Can I have his email...?

    sales@dduo.com

    Seriously.

  106. The problem with that theory is by RLiegh · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The article shows him refusing a number of emails that are presented to him. So, while I tend to agree with you on the hoarding part, I think either it is not to a pathological degree -or it's a different pathology entirely.

    1. Re:The problem with that theory is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7 out of 10 of those emails were probably Viagra.
      I guess he already got his barrels of that...

  107. Re:An interesting proposal about why you'd want SP by DrugCheese · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't think so. The old mediums were precious and brought in some bucks because there were only so many of the originals printed. And half the game was how well that printed media has stood the test of time and how well it was preserved. With digital media you have an unlimited amount of originals and copies of the originals which are indistinguishable from the originals.

    Now I do imagine there will be an Email Spam Museum site, showcasing the evolution of spam and so on.

    --
    *DrugCheese rants*
  108. We'll be rich, RICH, I tell you!!! by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    You're morally obligated to seperate a fool and his money. Particularly a fool of this magnitude. Now I just need to think up a good scam, er... product that he'll shell out the moola for!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:We'll be rich, RICH, I tell you!!! by martin · · Score: 1

      like I said - lart stick

      http://developer.syndetic.org/query_jargon.pl?te rm =LART

    2. Re:We'll be rich, RICH, I tell you!!! by VVerevvolf · · Score: 1

      I've got it !!

      Dihydrogen Monoxide Insurance.
      Be sure to include stiff fees for intentional exposure and that death due to withdrawal is not covered.

      /.-,

      --
      The above post should not be taken literally, figuratively, or any other way. Why are you even reading it?

      /.-,
  109. Lord have mercy!!!! by trailerparkcassanova · · Score: 0

    This guy's penis must be HUGE!!!!!!

  110. Too bad he was accessing the wrong folder by StandardCell · · Score: 2, Funny

    He probably deletes his Inbox on a regular basis.

  111. Why didn't he buy the smokes? by gatorflux · · Score: 1

    It offered Newports -- his brand -- for $2.85 a pack, about a third of what he pays at a corner store near his home. He saved the message for later consideration.

    The only product they mentioned that he actually uses and he didn't buy them? What a doorknob.

  112. No, but we do have the author's address. by iamacat · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Write to Mylene Mangalindan at mylene.mangalindan@wsj.com". Shall we?

  113. Probably a plant... by LDorman · · Score: 1

    Yes he probably has the IQ of a geranium, but I don't mean that kind of plant. What I do mean: He's probably someone with a vested interest in sending spam who wants to establish that there is value to spam so that it can then become protected free speech.

    --
    Bush makes our troops prey...
    1. Re:Probably a plant... by Luminous · · Score: 1

      I think I have to agree. I know I get way over 200 spam a day - mostly my own fault so I'm not complaining, but still, this guy is verifying over and over that he is actively interested and he is saying he isn't inundated with spam? That is balogna.

      --
      This is not the way to build a lasting empire.
  114. His favorite food ? by biet · · Score: 1

    Spam of course !

    (I know it's a poor one but couldn't help)

    1. Re:His favorite food ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try this in the morning: Make a breakfast of spam and eggs, then read the fresh batch of spams in your inbox. It's quite refreshing.

  115. "supporting digital pollution..." by SammysIsland · · Score: 1

    There are tons of people out there who love spam. If no one ever responded or took interest in the spam, why would anyone spend so much money to send it?

    I find it interesting to watch my roomates hurry to call into the home shopping networks because they put that phony timer on there, or say in a commercial that the offer is only valid if you call in the next ten minutes. "While supplies last" is the greatest of all!

    It's just like the dihydrogen monoxide stunt. People are really, really dumb, and in the case of spam have small penises and lots of debt.

  116. Ooo! by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 1
    a $220 computer server, computer parts and hundreds of software discs

    Spam software eh? What's the number of the BSA again? Or Symantec?

  117. E-mail marketing by Vexware · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I personally beleive that this is somewhat clear proof that marketing by e-mail can work, but only if it is taken in hand by honest companies who do not deal through an nigh-on anonymous mass-mailing scheme. Take a look at the statistics, and you will notice 8% of the respondents to a survey conducted asking whether or not they had bought anything through spam replied affirmatively, though spammers say that this number is higher due to the fact that most people having bought products through spam can not bear the embarassment of admitting it. Now if you reflect on those numbers, and consider that a lot of people delete spam as soon as they see some in their inbox, or use some kind of spam filter, you could perhaps come to a conclusion which may not be so far off the truth.

    Let's suppose the companies which now sell their products through mass-mailing could come to some sort of agreement with e-mail services. This agreement would involve allowing the user to choose whether or not they would like to receive some offers from the company that has come to the agreement with the service. The e-mail service could choose to impose limits to the company, such as the number of e-mails sent and the products offered in the e-mails. As this feature would be an opt-in option, the user would be responsible for what comes through their inboxes. I think this kind of feature would actually benefit every party involved, as the e-mail service could really control what would be coming through to their users' inboxes, the users would know what to expect in their inboxes, and the companies could actually make more profit from this system. What I mean by this is, as most e-mail users would be expecting to receive their offers by e-mail, they would be the people who would be actually expected to buy what comes through. There would be more sales than there would be complaints and deletion. Last of all, this would of course benefit the people who would like to receive some honest, discounted offers by e-mail. The whole system would be completely legal.

    In my opinion, this is how marketing by e-mail could actually be something that works, and that, at the end of the day, leaves both the sales companies, the e-mail services and the e-mail users satisfied.

    --
    "Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional side effect" -- Linus Torval
  118. Ask Slashdot by minusthink · · Score: 1

    Maybe Taco can get him for Ask Slashdot so we can all berate him with "questions" like:

    "What are you doing, stupid?" (5, Informative)
    "Why are you such a jackass?" (5, Funny)
    "How big is your penis now? Do the creams really work?" (5, Funny)

    --
    "when life gets complicated, I like to take a nap in a tree and wait for dinner" - Hobbes.
  119. RTFA by zarr · · Score: 2, Informative

    In the past, Mr. Soto says he has sent out spam himself, but he doesn't any more for fear of the increasing multitude of federal and state spam regulations now on the books.

  120. Kill him!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He mades spam a profitable business.

  121. why you'd want spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd agree BUT how many people are keeping it, even if millions and billions are being distributed? SPAM may actually turn out to be THE most rare form of collectible advertising!

    1. Re:why you'd want spam by DrugCheese · · Score: 1

      Open up your hotmail account.

      TADA!

      Your own personal spam archive ;)

      --
      *DrugCheese rants*
  122. dduo.com by alanxyzzy · · Score: 2, Informative
    Have a look at http://www.dduo.com/
    it says
    Warmest Regards, Orlando Soto Here - Webmaster/Owner
    and ask yourself what sort of person would be selling such a package of dodgy software.

    From the article:

    Mr. Soto's wife, Paula Kennedy,
    and the domain registration:
    $ whois dduo.com
    Administrative Contact:
    Kennedy, Paula pkennedy@...ke
    Design OP
    325 w 43 st
    325 w 43 st
    new york, New York 10036
    United States
    (111) 111-1111 Fax --
    1. Re:dduo.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yeah. There was a comment further up that said the guy must be some sort of professional spammer looking to improve the image of spam.

  123. Poor chap ... by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

    "One such somebody is Mr. Soto. He buys spam-pitched aromatherapy oils for his wife and pharmaceuticals for himself. "

    So, from that we can deduce what? hmmm , He likes to give his wife a good rub-down, but needs "pharmaceuticals" for himself... (what kind of spam-advertised pharpaceuticals might that be)

    Me thinks he cant get-it-up because he spends too much time online!

    --
    Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
  124. Whew! by sootman · · Score: 1

    Doing a little digging, I see that I was born at the same time, down to the minute, as Mr. Soto. Therefore, *I'm* not a sucker. :-)

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  125. Elite population of responders keeps spam alive? by Silas · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be funny if some day we find out that there's some small population of people, maybe a few hundred around the world, who make up the bulk of spammer revenue and have thusly single-handedly kept the spamming phenomenon alive? Given that there's a similarly small group of spammers that account for most of the spam traffic out there, it wouldn't surprise me.

    Maybe we should track those people down, compile their name on a list, and sell that to the spammers for $0.01 on the condition -- no, with the extra added benefit for them -- that they not send to anyone else ever again. Why would they bother, if they can get the same revenue as before without all the overhead?

    We now return you to your regularly programmed reality...

  126. Too optimistic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's "There's an idiot born every minute." I think this is a much more realistic figure.

    NR

  127. News Flash! by abertoll · · Score: 2

    People actually buy products advertised in spam! That's why spammers do it!

    --
    "he drew his sword Ringil that glittered like ice... and he wounded Morgoth with seven wounds..."
  128. I know Kung Fu... by JohnDoe.Slashed · · Score: 0

    Neo:
    What are you trying to tell me that I can dodge traffic?

    Morpheus:
    No, Neo. I'm trying to tell you that when you're ready, you won't have to.

    How 'bout forwarding spam he founds interesting?

  129. Quoting from the famous... by ColdBoot · · Score: 1

    Bugs Bunny, "What a maroon!"

  130. I bought spam... (ionizer) by Jogar+the+Barbarian · · Score: 1

    Well, not directly. I got an ad for a small, table-top air cleaner/ionizer that sounded decent. I didn't buy from the spammer, but looked for the specific brand online, and found several vendors selling it. I got one for fifty bucks, and it's just a cheezy plastic thing with a 80mm case fan and an ionizing filament in it. I ran it for about a month before the fan started rattling and I had to shut it off. I don't know what I'm going to do with it; but I sure learned my lesson.

    That's the first and last time I ever bought spam.

    On a side note, Consumer Reports says the far-and-away best ionizing air cleaner is the Friedrich C-90A. I've seen it as low as $410. It's pricier than the Sharper Image Ionic Breeze, but way, way better. I want one.

    --
    3. Profit!
    2. ???
    1. On Soviet Slashdot, a Beowulf cluster of alien Natalie Portman overlords welcomes YOU!
  131. This guy is a genius... by abertoll · · Score: 1

    He basically got instant publicity by claiming to love spam. How come I never come up with these stunts?

    --
    "he drew his sword Ringil that glittered like ice... and he wounded Morgoth with seven wounds..."
  132. ads vs. spam by Leon_Trotsky · · Score: 1

    You want to complain about bandwidth usage? What exactly is the difference between banner ads (such as ^^^^) and spam. Really.

    --
    Ohhh! Pay Dirt! A pair of half-eaten choco-pants!
    1. Re:ads vs. spam by Big_Al_B · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uh, /. is a big endeavor, taking time and money from the site's proprietors. It's free to you. I'd quit complaining about what they have to do to fund your entertainment. Really.

    2. Re:ads vs. spam by Zed2K · · Score: 1

      You can block web ads easier than spam. The majority of web ads all come from the same places. Using any good browser you can block via site. You never download it unlike spam filters in which you have to download it just to see what it is. With the web site you only have to grab the page source and the parser then determines what images it will download.

      Also web ads are usually for actual products or services unlike spam which, for the most part, is nothing but one con after another.

    3. Re:ads vs. spam by Leon_Trotsky · · Score: 1

      Slashdot isn't a big endeavor. Good content? yes. Interesting? Yes. A big endeavor? Hardly. ps: I wasn't complaining, I was merely initiating a discussion. don't be so sensitive. Really.

      --
      Ohhh! Pay Dirt! A pair of half-eaten choco-pants!
    4. Re:ads vs. spam by Big_Al_B · · Score: 1
      Not complaining? Seemed explicitly implicit to me... :^/

      Anyway, giving you the benefit of the doubt, I'll engage you in this "discussion." The primary difference is that the HTTP protocol introduces a "user opt in" element that SMTP doesn't.

      Under normal circumstances, users aren't "forced" to visit any given website that has banner-ads (not counting pr0n pop-ups and the like). You elect your default homepage, and you initiate outbound "GETs" to acquire more content.

      But with email, user mail clients must receive all the messages the server has waiting for them, whether it's spam or ham.

      Another technical difference is the distribution of high impact image (banners for example) content to localized server clusters, like Akamai. It minimizes inter-AS bandwidth. Unlike SPAM which does the opposite.

      don't be so sensitive. Really.

      ?? I have no idea what you're talking about...

  133. Filling out personal information on spam?? by retro128 · · Score: 1

    Identity theft case in 3...2...1...

    --
    -R
  134. What I Want To Know Is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can we access WSJ articles directly? I thought all their material was for online subscribers only?

  135. SPAM = SCAM most of the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Almost all people I know who ordered something from spam emails have either never received anything or got a product so bad they had to throw it away or got their credit card info stolen. Unfortunately the later seems to happen more and more often.

  136. nigerian scam by Roadmaster · · Score: 1, Funny

    just wait till this guy gets into a nigerian scam and loses everything.. i bet the wife will be thrilled.

  137. Some choice quotes from the article by smellystudent · · Score: 3, Funny

    He buys [snip] pharmaceuticals for himself.
    I wonder what kind...

    Mr. Soto says he also has bought some adult DVDs and videos via spam, but never got around to marketing them.
    cUmc0\/ered h%0t dvdz!!! on1y u5ed 1nce!!! 51ightly 5t1cky.

    --
    Predictive text is shiv!
    1. Re:Some choice quotes from the article by sketerpot · · Score: 1

      And this guy says that he reads spams for recreation. I guess he's either a masochist or stupid, probably both since he spends hundreds of dollars keeping spamming scum in business.

  138. Damn it!! by SpamJunkie · · Score: 1

    This guy is stealing my schtick!

    1. Re:Damn it!! by SpamJunkie · · Score: 1

      Ok, maybe this is a little complex. Let me explain: I'm SpamJunkie. That's my name. OK? Now, go look at the title of this story? eh? eh?

      Still don't get it? Damn moderators...

  139. "Something for Everyone" by aanand · · Score: 1

    I guess this proves that there really is something for everyone online.

    I think it's more a case of there being someone for everything.

  140. I can't believe this guy. by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I did RTFA and I'm here to tell you this guy needs professional help. What a nutcase.
    People that engage in this type of behavior on a regular basis have some sort of OCD problem.

    I know a few people like this guy, they troll garage sales and flea markets and their houses are full to bursting with *shit*...

    They have this vision that they are going to resell the crap at garage sales and flea markets and make a living. Truth is, they lose BIG every time they set up at a flea market. They spend ~$200 to set up a booth for the weekend and if they are really lucky they sell about $15 worth of the crap they collect.

    At garage sales it just costs them the time to do it but they usually only bring in less than $50 for the trouble.

    These people are chasing the brass ring but they never catch it. What a waste of time, effort and money..

    1. Re:I can't believe this guy. by $criptah · · Score: 1

      I have to say that consumption in large quantities must be an American trend. I came to the United States during my early teens and I have turned into an American since then because a lot of my views have formed here, not in my country of birth. However, I am still can't understand why Americans buy so much crap.

      A friend of mine always buys Xmas presents for the next year right after Xmas in order to save money. She's not poor, she makes good money and yet if the stuff goes on sale, she gets it automatically. Whenever she goes to Gap she shops by weight, I swear! As long as she can carry it, she gets it. There there are other units that raid Wal-Mart on a weekly basis where they get more stuff than they can cosume in a month. What the fuck is up with that? I do enjoy having a clean shirt everyday myself, but in my case I have X number of shirts that I bought a long time ago and I am not planning on getting any new ones as long as the old shirts are in good shape. That's not the case with the majority of Americans that I know.

  141. RTFROS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (rules of spam, that is)

    1. Spammers lie.
    2. If in doubt, see rule 1.

    1. Re:RTFROS by zarr · · Score: 1

      OK...

      Mr Soto claims he is a spammer (or was, but once a spammer, always a spammer). By the first rule of spam, Mr Soto is lying, and is therefore not a spammer afterall.
      But, if he isn't a spammer, he's probably telling the thruSTACK OVERFLOW!!!

  142. He is rich he got like 40 mill from nigeria by bxbaser · · Score: 1

    plus he probably has 4 or 5 other deals on the table.

  143. Poor dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He really should get a life.

  144. I have to admit, I'm guilty by Ignorant+Aardvark · · Score: 1

    I have bought something from spam: a DVD+R/RW burner from TigerDirect. I don't know if they count as spam as not, but I don't ever recall signing up for their list. It's pretty easy to get off their list though (i.e. the unsubscribe link actually works), so it's not as bad as some of the spam out there.

  145. awesome quote from the information whale by kisrael · · Score: 1

    I am nuts for information-- as are we all, I suspect, most real men and women. I can't get enough of the stuff. When I'm clicking through the hundreds of E-mail messages that await me each morning, sometimes I imagine I'm a mighty information whale, sifting through thousands of tiny (but nutritious!) krill bits. Yum! Whether it's reading the cereal box or scanning the advertisment slide show some genius thought to project on the big screen at the movie theater, my appetite for information is unquenchable.
    --Joshua Quittner

    --
    SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
  146. I agree by Tired_Blood · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The whole thing stopped making sense when he complains of only getting 17 spams in one day.

    The article then states, "He's the kind of person spammers love: a serial buyer."

    If he were the kind of person spammers love, then why am I getting many times more spam and I've never bought anything via SPAM? I'm still just a potential sell, while he's the guaranteed one.

    I call BS.

    --
    This is not my sig.
  147. He SENDS spam. by brlancer · · Score: 2, Insightful
    From the article:
    In the past, Mr. Soto says he has sent out spam himself, but he doesn't any more for fear of the increasing multitude of federal and state spam regulations now on the books.

    The problem here is he doesn't comprehend and/or care that spam hurts consumers. This isn't just a hobby for him, it was a part-time business. People shouldn't dismiss him as some eccentric old man, there's no ambiguity here: he was previously an unlawful spammer and he encourages unlawful spammers. He is the problem.

    Short of making it illegal to buy from unlawful spammers or public humiliation (I'm sure he will get plenty, now), I don't know of a way to get buyers to stop.

    --
    Someone asked if I had patched against MSBlast; I said yes, I installed Linux.
    1. Re:He SENDS spam. by mabu · · Score: 1

      Surprise, surprise.. the guy who "likes spam" is/was a spammer himself.

      This may qualify as the stupidest story Slashdot has ever called attention to. If I want to see idiots get their 15 minutes of fame for being dumbasses, I'll check the Darwin awards, fark, drudge, fox or a plethora of other lame sites. I always thought Slashdot's purpose was to talk about tech and intelligent issues. Now this site is stooping to trolling and calling attention to the 0.01% dregs of humanity in order to whore a little more traffic.

      Shame on you editors! Get your shit together! Slashdot is turning into a goddam tabloid!

  148. Re:People like him should stay away from the Inter by SnappleMaster · · Score: 1

    Staying away from the internet wouldn't help this poor sod. I'd suggest a nice bouncy rubber room.

    I'd love to see his credit card balances. :)

    --
    Be happy. Nothing else matters.
  149. -- Look, his email address! spam away! by andy55 · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    See this post on news.admin.net

    Good find! Now to the nitty gritty, slashdotters--here's a whois on dduo.com ...

    Registrant:
    Design OP
    325 w 43 st
    325 w 43 st
    new york, New York 10036
    United States

    Registered through: GoDaddy.com
    Domain Name: DDUO.COM
    Created on: 27-May-03
    Expires on: 27-May-04
    Last Updated on: 11-Mar-04

    Administrative Contact:
    Kennedy, Paula pkennedy@nyc.rr.com
    Design OP
    325 w 43 st
    325 w 43 st
    new york, New York 10036
    United States
    (111) 111-1111 Fax --
    Technical Contact:
    Kennedy, Paula pkennedy@nyc.rr.com Design OP
    325 w 43 st
    325 w 43 st
    new york, New York 10036
    United States
    (111) 111-1111 Fax --

    Domain servers in listed order:
    NS1.RACKSHACK.NET
    NS2.RACKSHACK.NET

    A fellow receiver of 500-1000 spams a day, I think we should each email Paula and Mr. Soto and tell them how much we appreciate their support of the spammers.

    Thanks Mr. Soto!
  150. Stipples. by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Journal started using stippled portraits, or hedcuts in 1979. Apparently, they remind readers of currency or engraved stock certificates. Although the style can be approximated with image filters, the WSJ's hedcuts are hand drawn.

    1. Re:Stipples. by pileated · · Score: 1

      That's interesting. I've always liked their hedcuts and also wondered how they did them. Long live the hand-drawers!

  151. Spam Is Good If You're Signed-up For It by $criptah · · Score: 1

    I have no problems with spam as long as it is targeted towards people who may benefit from it. If somebody loves to receive spam and spend money on goods advertised through that method, more power to them; at least they keep some people employed and spend money. However, what bothers me is that according to WSJ, only a small fraction of people who receive spam buy their stuff that way. I would love to do more shopping through e-mail advertising if companies did not trash my inbox on a daily basis and send me stuff that I am interested in. For example, I have no problems if a legid company sends me a news letter once in two months telling me what they have for ME. If I receive 5-10 e-mails per month that contribute to my needs, I have no problems with it.

    The thing is that I hate malls and shopping. I know what I want and what I need. I know my sizes and the styles that I like. I live in Boston and any trip to the mall will cost me whatever I spend on the goods plus at least two-fifty that I spend on transportation plus a couple of dollars that I normally spend on food. I do not know why women are so crazy about shopping; I think it is a waste of my time.

    The solution to my problem comes in the mail; both standard and electronic. I signed up letters from several retailers (Green Mountain Coffe, J.Crew, etc). Now my coffee comes in the mail, same goes for clothing and accessories in case if I need them. If I do not need this crap, I simply delete stuff from my inbox and recycle the catalogs. Insted of wasting hours on shopping, I am relaxing, running, going to the gym. In fact, I am about to sign up for Pea-Pod, a delivery service provided by Stop-and-Shop. They can deliver food of my choice right to my door for $5. Pretty good, huh?

    1. Re:Spam Is Good If You're Signed-up For It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spam Is Good If You're Signed-up For It

      If you signed up fot it, by definition it is not spam.

      Spam - Unsolicited Bulk Email

    2. Re:Spam Is Good If You're Signed-up For It by JuggleGeek · · Score: 1
      I have no problems with spam as long as it is targeted towards people who may benefit from it.

      The people who send the spam decide who to target. They often feel that their product will benefit everyone, so they send to everyone. They often don't know anything about an email address they are sending to except the address - so they send it anyway.

      You're "It's OK if it's targetted" theory leaves the spammers in charge, and my mailbox full of junk.

      I have no problem with email marketing as long as it is sent to people who opted in. (Really, truely opted in - not "I bought your address from some guy who claims you opted in").

      The only legitimate email marketing is confirmed opt in (which the spammers call "double opt in").

  152. Spam is not bad! by snellgrove2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Spam isn't bad. I have to say I am delighted to receive spam and that it exists.

    If there wasn't spam, I wouldn't have a Bayesian filter..and nor would you. Im sure you would actually miss having one. I know I would, a Bayesian filter is a geeky thing to own. Do any of your non-PC literate friends have one? No. Of course not. They probably use hotmail.

    So yeah, spam is great, I never actually read any, I just receieve it, in a nice packaged and quarantined form and it goes into my "spam" box.

    long live Bayesian Spam Filters, and long live spam!

    just my rather weird 0.02 :)

  153. Maybe this guy could lend me a hand by bigberk · · Score: 1

    I want more spam. I'm not kidding you, I seriously need to find a way to get more spam. I already post my address on USENET, slashdot, on web sites. And I use unsubscribe links in spam I receive.

    Yet despite doing all this I still only receive about 150 spams/day. Any idea how I can get more? I bet this guy knows the secret... if only he could share!

  154. Best Quote... by CrisTUFR · · Score: 1

    I am surprised no one else has pointed this out.

    Mr. Soto says he also has bought some adult DVDs and videos via spam, but never got around to marketing them.

    Rrright... Why do I have a hard time believing that was his purpose for buying those tapes? :)

  155. Sounds like BS for another reason... by mikech@rbsgi · · Score: 1

    This guy responds to several messages per week and yet only receives 50-150 messages per day? One mail account I have kept open for some time is up to 300+ message per day and I have never responded to a spam. I would expect that someone who responds with any frequency to receive many hundreds (1000+?) of messages per day. /mike

  156. I guess this proves.. by puusism · · Score: 1

    I guess this proves that there really is something for everyone online.

    And that there is someone for everything online.

    --
    - Ismo
  157. I dunno by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
    The whole article seems a bit phony. Especially the use of the word "anti" by Mr. Soto. There is one group of people who are fond of using the word "anti" to describe those who dislike spam. I get a strong feeling that this is not just some innocent guy that likes to buy from spam, and his admission of spamming once before leaves me even more suspicious.

    While he probably is an active spammer, I definitely consider myself anti-spam. And I don't need anyone to attach that label for me.

    In fact, if I weren't so damned lazy, I'd track this moron down and kill him. And his children. And the "proud" 45-year-old grandfather's grandchildren as well.

    1. Re:I dunno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it's okay for you to stoop to even lower levels?

      That's only your emotions playing inside your nerves. Anger making you say and do things without thought and reflection.

      Go to Middle-east and rejoice in the "fun" they have gotten out of that route. It's only downhill once you've embarked..

    2. Re:I dunno by kiolbasa · · Score: 1

      While he probably is an active spammer, I definitely consider myself anti-spam. And I don't need anyone to attach that label for me.



      It's more specific than that. There are those who consider themselves "anti-spam" and some call themselves "anti-spammers." But specific use of the word "anti" abbreviated like that is the mark of a spammer. It's like a jargon word among spammers. When you see someone ranting on about how "those antis are ruining commerce on the net!" you can bet it's a spammer. That's why I'm suspicious.

      --

      Beer wants to be free
  158. Common Denominators by Obfuscant · · Score: 4, Insightful
    We live in a society of lowest common denomenators.

    We complain about the quality of our television programs ("I'm a TV Star, Get Me Out Of Here!", "Joe Millionaire", etc.), but they stay on the air because Joe Denomenator watches them. He doesn't watch "Babylon 5" or anything that makes him think. (A producer of Andromeda is reported to have left the show because the network wanted less story line and more action. It was "too hard" for Joe Denomenator to follow multi-show stories. Andromeda has been a mashed-potato show ever since.)

    Other mass media has followed. In the checkout line we get tabloids shouting "Lose ten pounds in a week without getting off your sorry ass", and "Have better sex with whomever it is you are banging this week". The venerable TV Guide has become TV Gossip instead of a programming guide.

    Big box stores filled with cheap imports smother smaller, local stores until they go out of business, leaving nothing but cheap imports available. Joe Denomenator doesn't want to pay $20 for a radio that will last for years, he wants to pay $10 for one that he'll have to replace in a month, because it is too much effort to keep track of the one he has for more than a month anyway.

    Why would anyone think that the Internet would be different, after using it became a "right" for Joe Denomenator?

    1. Re:Common Denominators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To me you are a "Joe Denominator".

      I hate cheesy sci-fi on the teen channels like andromeda and star trek etc.

      Those shows are not "intelligent". Wow it has some phony physics babble and some "intergalactic intrigue". Spare me.

      Do you think Xena: Warrior Princess is good too? Well, you certainly would if it was in outerspace instead of back in time.

      Watching cheesy sci-fi shows is not an action of a "smart" person.

      Maybe if Joe Denominators like you stopped watching those pathetic shows the rest of us wouldn't have to see them...

      Well ok I admit it I don't actually watch TV anymore basically because it's all crap, but with morons like you who think they are smart for watching some bullshit sci-fi like that pretty much ensures there will be nothing but shit on TV...

      Yes, Andromeda is truely the thinking man's program...haha.

      If I had a dollar for every "genius" that sat on his fat ass watching cartoons (from japan or otherwise) or sci-fi schlock I would be very wealthy. Yes, men of true genius watch lots of UPN! In fact 3 of the last nobel laureates in physics are huge fans of Earth: Final Conflict and NEVER miss an episode! Haha...ya....

    2. Re:Common Denominators by mandalayx · · Score: 1

      We live in a society of lowest common denomenators.

      Well it seems that mass media and mass advertising (including spam) is by definition dumb. Like you say, mass-x must appeal to the most amount of people in order to be considered *mass*. And since people have such diverse interests, dislikes, etc (recall trying to find a suitable mate), those who are trying to engineer mass-phenomena are really just looking to capture the most amount of people, and one way to do so is to capture a common or widespread desire in the whole sum of people.

      Think sex, think killing, think violence, think drama, think celebrities, think scandal, think beer, think stupidity.

      Or just think.

    3. Re:Common Denominators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So Babylon 5 is your idea of a show that makes you think? I wonder who's the real "Joe Denomenator [sic]" here. If you looked a little further than mainstream television you would realize that there's film far more intellectual than cheap SF.

    4. Re:Common Denominators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So your a Babylon 5 right? A real intellectual, aren't we?

  159. Object Lesson by Vexler · · Score: 1

    Here is how to dissuade Mr. Soto from buying anymore from spams: 1) Pretend to be a spammer and once in a while send something to him, such as weight-loss pills (heck, he's a 45-year-old grandfather - I guess he is starting to expand horizontally). The rate he's going, he will bite eventually. 2) When he does respond, get his shipping (i.e. residential) address and phone number, and promise him that delivery is scheduled in the next week or two. 3) At this point, you have several options: You can either send him laxatives in disguise (and I do mean the maximum strength stuff, accompanied by directions to use it liberally everyday), or you can show up at his house with some psychos and just pelt his car/house/real estate with rotting spam. Or you can think of some other thing - if you are at his doorstep, the sky's the limit. 4) Repeat as desired, but with another line of product under another contact name.

  160. This might be good news. by jetsfandb · · Score: 1

    If enough idiots like him are known to exist, perhaps it could strengthen the case for making smap legal only to people on opt-in lists, instead of forcing everyone to join opt-out lists like the Do-not-call lists.

    --
    It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion, It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, The hands acqui
  161. Spam? How about junk mail and unsolicited calls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Of the three Orlando Sotos in New York State, only one is in Manhattan, much less Midtown Manhattan.

    Orlando Soto - (212) 399-0626 - 325 W 43rd St, New York, NY 10036 (public info via google)

  162. RE:Junkie Loves His Spam by Dorsai42 · · Score: 1

    This is a self-correcting problem, the guy smokes cigarettes.

    --
    If you forget about the future, the future will forget about you.
  163. He must have a VERY LARGE ONE.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    His penis must be so large that it touches the ground.
    Now THAT is one hung dude...

  164. God-given right... by youknowmewell · · Score: 0

    So being able to respond to spam is his God-given right?

  165. I hate this guy... by TerryAtWork · · Score: 1

    I think he should be devoured by snakes.

    Sorry....

    --
    It's Christmas everyday with BitTorrent.
  166. Here's the real way to fight spam... by jeffehobbs · · Score: 1

    ...by mercilessly making fun of them. Good stuff, I've been following this guy's work for a while. Hilarious.

    ~jeff

  167. Two Words by Y+Ddraig+Goch · · Score: 1

    Kaa-Ching. P. T. Barnum was right.

    --
    Meddle thou not in the affairs of Dragons, for thou art crunchy and with most anything.
  168. Donkey? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Orlando Soto might have the looks of a donkey, but he also has the brains to back it up!

    People - when asked "Please stand to the left to be handed a brain" when you are born, it's not something to challenge and think you're cool for doing so.

  169. Blogging, forums, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the guy is doing this to "unwind", why not introduce him to blogs and online forums.

    slashdot.com
    boingboing.net
    fark.com
    neo-trib almetalsmiths.com ... list your favorite

    if he is into the buying scene, eBay...

    What is it he truely needs.

  170. Re:Heres his PHONE NUMBER!!!!!!!!! by L0stm4n · · Score: 2, Informative

    Soto, Orlando
    325 W 43 St
    MANHATTAN, NY 10036

    212-399-0626

    He's not in at the moment though.

    --
    superman runs linux
  171. Devil's Advocate by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    So in the name of freedom, we should suppress freedom?

    Hmmm.... To bend the analogy in a devil's advocate sort of way, should we stop people from buying cigarettes to prevent second-hand smoke from hurting nonsmokers? To keep the inner city free of fear, should we restrict people from buying handguns? Does socialized healthcare make people more free because they no longer have to fear being without insurance if they try a job that fails them, or less free because they cannot fail? Is there a solution that allows freedom from all different points of view of what freedom is?

    We have to fight spam from another angle, not by supressing people's rights to do stupid things.

    Should people have the freedom to drive drunk? Why or why not?

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  172. As Yes, The One Wedding Ring... by Myriad · · Score: 1
    ... to rule them all!

    Blockwars: free, multiplayer, teris like game

    --
    "They do not preach that their god will rouse them, a little before the Nuts work loose." Kipling, 'The Sons of Martha'
  173. I know a better one by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 1

    This character actually responds to and buys from spam.

    This character, on the other hand, actually responds to spam, but doesn't buy from said spam, being 300 times funnier at the same time. I wonder why he haven't ever been mentioned on Slashdot. Probably because it's better to write about something stupid than something insightful... *sigh*

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
    1. Re:I know a better one by mlk · · Score: 1

      It is much more fun to DO than to read.

      Start a spam account today, and with the magic of alt.fraud, you don't even have to wait for the spam.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
  174. I don't suppose... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone would happen to have his Email address :-)

    I have about 250,000 spam messages I can send him. I've always wanted to know where I can send this crap.

    I'm sure he would appreciate the huge amount of stuff he can buy, provided he can even GET to his computer carrying his huge 'ding dong'.

  175. Not "funny," insightful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maybe not politically-correct, but this person is breeding faster than most of you, and he probably VOTES TOO. Sigh...
    me

  176. Hard up? by Lucky+Kevin · · Score: 1

    You would have thought that if he really bought all those pills the Viagra alone should have kept him occupied and away from his computer!

    It just shows that it doesn't work.

    --
    Kevin
    "It's not the cough that carries you off, it's the coffin they carry you off in" O. Nash
  177. Why doesn't he go on the web and LOOK for sh*t? by crovira · · Score: 1

    Its people like that, ign'urnt, lazy-ass, lame-brained twits, that give me a pain u know where.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  178. amazing... by catdevnull · · Score: 1

    I'm amazed that he can relax. I mean, after all the porn, viagra, levitra, botox, talking on new cell phones, re-financing, and helping Nigerians launder money into the US, that he has any free time to read e-mail.

    --

    I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
  179. That reminds me... by whatsit · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... of something a computer science professor once told me. It went something like, "You can write the best code in the world; design the best user interface and implement the strictest error catching, but you still can't keep the end user from being stupid."

    --

    user@host:/usr/bin$ whatis ./java
    java: nothing appropriate.
  180. ADV: Cure for Hording by Tatarize · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Act now! Supplies are limitied, guranteed cure for hording! xyzyzzYz"

    "For $19.99 you too can get this amazing cure..."

    "OCD medication is useless to combat this problem."

    "But, our solusion! 398293 is sure to work."

    "Act, now and get abillity to throw your trash out too..."

    --

    It is no longer uncommon to be uncommon.
  181. Cut cut cutcut. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't the obvious solution just to see what it is you like an a e-mail, and then try to find it at a legit source? Or at least go to it in a new browser so that there isn't a referrer ID or anything. That way they don't know it's from spam.

    I guess.

  182. This fool just needs to look at bargain forums. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This fool just needs to look at bargain forums. He would find better deals at fatwallet.com and other bargain forums then he will ever get from spam. And no, I have never bought anything from a spam email and I never will.

  183. JUST KILL THE STUPID SOB by fanatic · · Score: 0

    JUST KILL THE STUPID SOB

    --
    "that's not encryption - it's a new perl script that I'm working on..." - from some Matrix parody
  184. Junkie indeed by BeCre8iv · · Score: 1

    "Good spam, he says, leaves him feeling blessed and telling himself, "I can't believe this really came."

    --
    This perpetual motion machine Lisa made is a joke, it just keeps getting faster and faster. - Homer
  185. Only on slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This isn't a major cache cow for most business people

    Only a slashdotter would misspell "cash" ($$$) as "cache" (cache memory, I suppose, knowing this crowd). ;)

    1. Re:Only on slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      especially when it's supposed to be pronounced kay-shhh. NOT cash.

  186. Picture by minkeyboodle · · Score: 1

    Why did they only include a sketch of Mr. Soto? Is this really a real person? I don't doubt there are people like this, but maybe they couldn't find one in time for the article? Heh...

  187. You're late to the party. by torgosan · · Score: 1

    Thespamletters site has been mentioned before here on / ... way back when he was much more prolific in his writings but has fallen off. Still, the book might make for a great addition to the bookshelf [nope, I'm not associated with our humorous Mr. Land].

    --
    "If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand". -Milton F.
  188. Uh oh.. I did it too ... by thrill12 · · Score: 1

    ... when I clicked on the link above, Mozilla showed me whether I wanted to accept the cookie from the above website and I clicked 'Allow'.
    Now I will be tracked and this tracking can be used to target people with similar interests as me !

    I feel dirty...

    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
  189. Robert Hewitt Wolfe by Tatarize · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    To be fair this isn't Joe Denomenator at work it's Kevin-Sorbo is a complete retard at work.

    And calling Wolfe just the producer is wrong, he's more the creator than Roddenberry. He was just a producer of DS9.

    Mashed potatoes are way way better than Andromeda.
    Scifi screwed entry for Andromeda

    --

    It is no longer uncommon to be uncommon.
  190. This reminds me... by lhpineapple · · Score: 1

    of a satirical act a friend of mine once did in high school.

    We should send him an e-mail saying he could lose 12 pounds instantly. All he has to do is cut off his head.

  191. And your point is? by mabu · · Score: 1

    What? That we can cure ignorance? This is news?

    There will always be a percentage of people who are just stupid and unreasonably impressionable. One needs to only look at about half the crap that's advertised these days, whether it's spam-related or not, and see that there's a lot of useless junk that some people are buying. How does calling attention this do anything other than troll and promote more abusive marketing?

  192. Hmmm... by deepvoid · · Score: 1

    Does this mean he has a short penis, erectile disfunction, baldness, and enjoys spying on his teenage babysitters with remote cameras?

    --
    Fast machines, powerfull AI, impulsive invention,... All I lack is a good espresso machine!
    1. Re:Hmmm... by mlk · · Score: 1

      Are you discribing the Spam Junky, or /. readership?

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
  193. Buying constantly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Err.. I wouldn't want to mess with him. Nowadays he probably has like three-foot d*ck which has a viagra-overdose-induced permanent hard-on.

    Besides, after collecting money from dozens of african dictators and their families and staff, he probably has more money than Bill Gates.

    (or he has serious health problems due to low-quality and misused drugs and has been mugged and/or kidnapped for ransom a number of times.)

  194. How about going the other direction? by Atario · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Instead of trying to make the spammers do something to help us -- which they clearly have no incentive to do -- why not get spam-lovers to help?

    We can set up some standard place for people like this guy -- say, a specific domain (gimmespam.com? ibuyeverything.com?). Anyone could get an email account there; maybe it would even be a Yahoo! Mail-like webmail service. It would have an associated website listing everyone's email address on it, made optimally machine-readable (say, a CSV file). Maybe even associated interests listed ("crafts, cigarettes, and drugs, please") so spammers can target even better.

    Think about it: everyone wins.
    • The spammers can concentrate on those who will likely buy, thus dramatically increasing sales-to-spams-sent ratios (and decreasing costs, hence increasing profits)
    • The spam-lovers get tons more spam to play with (hey, knock yerself out, buddy!)
    • The rest of us get left alone (why bother sending email out to the wilderness where there's slim pickin's, when you can just raid the chicken coop?)
    Only issue is seeing if there are enough people like this guy around who will join in.

    I say let's do it!
    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    1. Re:How about going the other direction? by wmspringer · · Score: 1

      The rest of us get left alone (why bother sending email out to the wilderness where there's slim pickin's, when you can just raid the chicken coop?)

      Since it still brings in some money (just not as much), why not?

    2. Re:How about going the other direction? by Thuktun · · Score: 1

      Instead of trying to make the spammers do something to help us--which they clearly have no incentive to do--why not get spam-lovers to help? We can set up some standard place for people like this guy--say, a specific domain (gimmespam.com? ibuyeverything.com?). Anyone could get an email account there; maybe it would even be a Yahoo! Mail-like webmail service.

      Only one problem: who will pay for this?

      Die-hard spammers have already tried to divert spam to willing recipients, paying people to receive advertisements, and it failed. So long as cost-shifting their advertisements makes them money, spammers will continue to spew unsolicited junk to unwilling recipients.

  195. Different degrees of compulsion. by khasim · · Score: 2, Funny
    You're thinking of the extreme degree. This guy can resist sales pitches. But he feels better if he finds something that he can buy. He's tried to sell some of the stuff before, but he doesn't manage to find the time or energy to do so.

    From the article: Good spam, he says, leaves him feeling blessed and telling himself, "I can't believe this really came."

    That's psychological. The guy paid $150 for a METAL DETECTOR and he has a bad back.

  196. It's dead, Jim. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Tripod link is dead already.

  197. actually this wsj story cannot be published in by abhisarda · · Score: 1

    this manner.

    I read this article yesterday and was planning to post it to slashdot but
    read this
    "REMINDER: This service is for personal, non-commercial use only. For commercial reprints, Web links , e-mailings and other permission types, please visit our copyright and reprint center here."(reprints.dowjones.com).
    Reprint permission for this story would cost 350 $ for 3 months.

    1. Re:actually this wsj story cannot be published in by cubic6 · · Score: 1

      Deep linking (linking to individual articles) is legally vague. It's not clear whether they can legally demand money or disallow linking. If Slashdot were actually posting the entire text of the article, then they might have a slightly better legal position.

      --
      Karma: Contrapositive
  198. That's him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See this:



  199. No one would spam if it wasn't working by Atroxodisse · · Score: 1

    Think about it.

    And also, what is the average air speed of an unladen swallow?

    --
    Read my short stories - You won't regret it.
  200. Here's one of his pr0n sites: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    http://www.latinacharm.com

    I found that here



    Here's his email: osoto52493@aol.com
  201. spammers celebrate socially-engineering d'media by mabu · · Score: 1


    Eventually, spam prompted Mr. Soto to dabble in Internet entrepreneurship himself. He's bought fancy knives, leather jackets, stuffed animals, party supplies and software, all via spam, and then created Web sites to sell the items at a profit -- a skill he learned from another piece of spam. Mr. Soto says he also has bought some adult DVDs and videos via spam, but never got around to marketing them. He says he purchased two pornography Web sites, again via spam, and ran them for a while, but then he decided they weren't worth the trouble and disabled them. Likewise, he says he procured some provocative domain names via spam. In the past, Mr. Soto says he has sent out spam himself, but he doesn't any more for fear of the increasing multitude of federal and state spam regulations now on the books.


    I can see the Wall Street Journal running a troll like this, but Slashdot?

  202. how about a new, backward compatible protocol by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

    the legit smtp servers would eventually update, just make the pop3 (pop4?) server ask the (e)smtp server if it did actually send it, or if it was sent by some twat with an MTA running on their own computer, or from zombied spam relays. this would cut down on spam, and it could be slowly implemented, if it was backward compatible.

    all it would take is a new port on smtp server's being open, and the pop3/4 server sending the smtp server an MD5 checksum of the email, and the smtp server replying with yes or no.

    simple concept, probably a pain in the arse to make companies comply.

    and if you owned a domain, you would know that every email that was sent to a pop4 server would definately not be from your domain, unless it was supposed to be. linux.org (i think it was them) had this problem a few months ago when some twatty spammers were using the linux.org domain for spamming - this would stop that.

    would this work or am i just dreaming?

  203. Re:Can someone please post this guy's email to /.? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    osoto52493@aol.com

  204. EBay by ReciprocityProject · · Score: 1

    After reading the article, I just want to ask this guy: WHY CAN'T YOU JUST USE EBAY LIKE NORMAL PEOPLE? They have cheap pinball machines and all of that.

    1. Re:EBay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say he's addicted to the serendipity. With eBay, or the web, you have to have a vague idea of what you're looking for. This guy doesn't want to do that - he wants suggestions presented to him in a constant stream, stuff he wouldn't have thought of on his own (because he actively avoids trying, or just doesn't have much of a knack for it). It's not having the stuff or even getting the stuff he likes, it's getting all the "offers" - great deals every one. Following through and actually buying and receiving the stuff is probably more perfunctory than anything.

    2. Re:EBay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's one reason I said he should look on bargain forums like fatwallet and dvdtalk. He could just look at the constant flow of deals, coupons etc and pick anything that he saw that he liked.

  205. Wouldn't it be sad if he got one of these... by the+JoshMeister · · Score: 1

    Subject: Dear Valued PayPal Customer

    Dear Mr. Soto,

    Our database which contained your credit card information was recently erased in a crash. Please click on the link below to verify that our backup record contains the correct information.

    http://www.paypal.com/confirm/

    Thank you for your patience. We at PayPal strive to bring you the best service possible.

    [official PayPal logo here]
    PayPal.com

  206. Not sure on that last bit. by khasim · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "Article even mentions he turned a profit reselling the stuff online."

    From the article: He's bought fancy knives, leather jackets, stuffed animals, party supplies and software, all via spam, and then created Web sites to sell the items at a profit -- a skill he learned from another piece of spam.

    It doesn't say that he HAS sold them at a profit. Just that such was the intent.

  207. RE: on hoarders and OCD's by King_TJ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually, this was a huge issue with the "Home Shopping Network" type shows on cable and satellite TV, long before Internet "spam" existed.

    I recall reading stories of people who had homes filled from floor to ceiling with boxes, almost all still unopened, ordered from these TV networks. In fact, folks with this disorder probably account for a surprisingly large portion of these station's sales of goods - so it's little wonder the media hasn't done more to make people aware of it.

    On the other hand, I've done my share of flea market sales, and I can assure you that the vast majority of these "bargain hunter" shoppers simply get a thrill out of finding a "deal" on items. It's almost a sport or hobby for them. Typically, they make decent money, or they're retired with plenty of income (investments, pensions, etc.), and the amount they spend on needless shopping doesn't put that much of a dent in their total income.

    Just like some folks like to spend $50 or so at the bar on a weekend, or spend it on dinner and movie for entertainment value - these people like to blow a little cash on their flea market or online bargain hunts.

  208. Interesting quote by ezzzD55J · · Score: 1
    Mr. Soto says he also has bought some adult DVDs and videos via spam, but never got around to marketing them.
    Uhhuh, sure you haven't ;-)
  209. I question the quality/character of the WSJ .... by OldHawk777 · · Score: 1

    Mr. Soto's SPAM love can in no way justify indiscriminate delivery of SPAM to me or other citizens. The WSJ editors have become true space-cases to even present this as news (business) worthy. The WSJ was probably an early supporter of the "Opt-Out-Privacy-Slight OOPS" citizens' rights rape. The WSJ (of today) would probable present as business news worthy the personal satisfaction and financial benefits of a child pornographer. The WSJ is implying what is good for some must be good for everyone (I feel ... VFS[:(.

    W.S.J. URSICK

    --
    Unaccountable leaders are masters, and unrepresented people are slaves. How do US and EU fare?
  210. Today's sign of the Apocalypse. by VVerevvolf · · Score: 1

    I just had to read this again...
    "Let me show you," she said, retrieving a shoebox filled with plastic containers of bee-pollen complex, betaine hydrochloride and something called Oxy-Gen.
    ...
    Oxy-Gen...

    He used spam... to buy.... Oxy-Gen...

    This has been today's sign of the Apocalypse.

    /.-,

    --
    The above post should not be taken literally, figuratively, or any other way. Why are you even reading it?

    /.-,
  211. He may be lying, then... by Dimensio · · Score: 4, Funny

    If he is a spammer, by his own admission, then anything that he said with regards to "loving spam" is instantly suspect. Rule #1: Spammers LIE.

    Of course, there is rule #3: Spammers are STOOPID.

    1. Re:He may be lying, then... by Kiyooka · · Score: 1

      Yeah. If he's a spammer, he's probably trying to soften the anti-spam movement and make an impression on the public's mind: hey! some people don't mind spam! let's live with it! He's just being a crafty shrewd spam-businessman.

    2. Re:He may be lying, then... by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Those trixy, trixy spammers trying to steal our inboxes, we'll show them my preciouss... [token ring].

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    3. Re:He may be lying, then... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      They may be STOOPID but a lot of them drive better cars than most of us do. Of course, that also applies to senior management of large corporations and leaders of organized crime too.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    4. Re:He may be lying, then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is Mr Soto and i would like to explain that
      I was misquoted in the srticle because i never spammed in my life nor do i have any intentions to. At one timme i used optin mail list to promote one site. I have hence called the writer of the article and she confirmed my wording optin and we are trying to retract it.I am just a sei handicapped grandfather looking to add additional income for mmy fammily so all the cruel things written in this forum only proves how fast people can assume things. My websites are legitimate entireprises hand built and offer
      real value.

    5. Re:He may be lying, then... by Felinoid · · Score: 1

      I remember back when antispam advocates were making sure a spam king got a healthy dose of his own spam and he actually sued on the basis of harrasment.

      Receaving the very same spam he sends to all of us is harrasment? What dose that mean when he sends US spam?

      I do get board and for lack of anything to do I'll read the spam I receave.
      Spammers make it impossable for me to break my prommis of refusing to buy from spammers. They never try to sell me anything I'd ever want.

      And there was the slashdot story about how most spammers don't sell anything and just look for replys to harvest e-mail addresses for.. more spam...

      So given what we know:
      1. Spammers lie.
      2. Spammers think being spammed is grounds for a harrasment lawsute
      3. Most spam isn't selling you anything to start with.

      He clames he uses spam to shop.. As most spam is just harvesting replys from intrested shoppers it's impossable for him to actually do this.
      It's more likely he is lying to protect his business.
      Like any other spammer he likes spam WHEN HE SENDS IT.

      --
      I don't actually exist.
  212. eh? by ChuyMatt · · Score: 1
    Why? this is america, not like NL where you can explicitly say that you don't want unsolicited junk mail. Why should there be a double standard for electronic versions of the mail when snail mail gets to do it? Is it because of the money that the PO gets for the postage?

    there is a case in point that bulk email would not die on the internet either. they would have to just focus a bit harder on data mining.

    1. Re:eh? by dsci · · Score: 1

      Why should there be a double standard for electronic versions of the mail when snail mail gets to do it? Is it because of the money that the PO gets for the postage?

      Uh, how about because snail mail does not put unnecessary wear and tear on MY infrastructure. My real mailbox does not get hundreds of mail items per day, and if it did it would not wear it out faster...quite unlike harddrives, nic's and the like, not only for my computer but the server computers in the route as well. Nor does it generally spread malicious agents as 'spam' can do.

      There is no comparison between snail mail and email. They are very different things, that serve very different purposes. I can send a client fifty emails a day to his fifty he sent me as we try to solve a problem. It's quite interactive. I don't write anybody fifty snail mail letters a day; what would be the point?

      On the other hand, I don't send checks to my power company by email.

      Finally, there is a big difference between junk mail and junk email, but I admit it is only a matter of degree. Spam really does clog up the works. Admins all over the world have had to add hardware, repair hardware failures, emplace tools, etc. just to handle the loads (and abuse) caused by spam. With regular mail, the mail carrier has to run a route everyday whether I get one junk mail item or 20. Further, I don't see direct mailers breaking into my house to use my home as a 'junk mail relay,' a clearly intrusive activity that violates the law.

      --
      Computational Chemistry products and services.
  213. Mistake Number One? by Tellalian · · Score: 1

    Perhaps it wasn't such a good idea including your photo in an article labeling you as a supporter of spam, in a culture that's a hair's breadth away from executing spammers on sight.

  214. He's got it figured out alright by nfogh · · Score: 0

    1. Set up spam business
    2. Trick some desperate journalist into writing an article about how wonderful spam are.
    3. Make it be read by everyone on slashdot
    4. Profit

    Spam are plural, right?

    --
    !rotinom siht ni kcuts mI ,em pleh esaelP
  215. I doubt it by vandan · · Score: 1

    Either this guy is a spammer masquerading as a satisfied customer, or he's just a shrivel-dick who needs to buy Viagra anonymously ( pharmacutical products, indeed ... ) and makes the rest up.

    Anyone who actually tried to buy as much as this guy claims would find that most spam set-ups are pure scams that will take your money and disappear.

    1. Re:I doubt it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you been scammed by those Viagra folks, too?

  216. previous post by tacokill · · Score: 1

    So if there are so many buyers out there who respond to spam, then why is there a problem with me opting out of ALL spam? Because of the many buyers, the businesses should not have a problem with me opting out.

    So why do they?

  217. Survey Methodology by cgenman · · Score: 1

    A little bit can be found here.

    Apparently, they surveyed their 1,118 of their own customers.

    This is how bad statistics are born, people. An anti-spamming company surveys their own clients to find out what they think defines Spam, casually asks if they brought this down upon themselves, and find out that a surprisingly large percentage deserve what they got. Then news agencies get hold of this, strip out the "customers of" part, and it has become truth about the human condition. Furthermore, 6-10% of those surveyed said that spam can come from someone you have purchased from before. And, at least according to the above link, they didn't have to buy the product through the spam, just that they bought what was advertised in the spam, like a new Cingular Wireless telephone or a John Deere tractor. Or, for that matter, buying a subscription to the Wall Street Journal after they spammed you from the free signup page.

    So in other words, it's a pretty big stretch to say that 8% of all people (+-2%) have bought from spam.

    Note to Journalists: Can we at least put survey methodology in a footnote? It is a form of integrity, true, but it's not as much of a hassle as fact checking or having an objective viewpoint of your subjects.

  218. More importantly.... by Surt · · Score: 1

    There is someone for everything online.

    --
    "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  219. Don't be too hard on this guy by serutan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Soto may be a off toward the end of the curve, but the general prevalence of his type of behavior is the basis for a multibillion dollar advertising industry, not just spam. If average, normal people didn't act this way, at least to some extent, modern advertising as we know it wouldn't exist.

  220. they can't vote by SethJohnson · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    I agree with you. Just to continue on this off-topic, though, I'd like to point out that the reason why kids can't legally smoke is because they can't vote. Our leaders recognize that tobacco use is an extreme blight on the healthcare system and would ban it if it weren't for all the voting tobacco addicts. The insurance industry wields immense lobbying power and is responsible for product safety laws passed requiring helmets on motorcycles, seatbelts and toddler carseats in automobiles, and prohibiting smoking in the workplace. Tobacco isn't a personal freedom issue. It's a public safety issue. Anytime a product hits the market with even just a few deaths related to its use, the govt. gets all up in their shit. Look at Halloween costumes and the federal laws regulating what materials they can be made out of and how visible they are in the dark.

    Cigarrettes are the ONLY product sold in America that will kill the user if used correctly.
  221. The economics in the article are suspect by World_Leader · · Score: 1


    "If everyone hated spam, it would disappear. But like the traditional direct-mail marketers and telemarketers who came before them, spammers survive public outrage, filters, lawsuits and regulations because innumerable times a day, somebody, somewhere responds with money"

    This may sound reasonable on the surface but may also be 100% false.

    Spammers need money to survive personally which may or may not come from their spamming. Even that is suspect, how many people sink their life savings into going into a business and lose it all?

    That said, all spammers really need are advertisers to pay them. Whether anyone ever responds to those ads is a different question.

    There's a famous marketing saying: Only half of my advertising works, now if I could just figure out which half!

    The point is businesses spend on lots of advertising that returns nothing. But whoever they're paying still makes money, there are no guarantees.

    You'd think the marketeers would realize this and stop paying the spammers. But real life is not so simple. Maybe it will eventually start working? Or maybe it's worthwhile because it puts the product name or concept in front of people and they'll buy it through some other means.

    It's not like every commercial on TV causes you to immediately run out and buy the product or has any feedback whatsoever as to its effectiveness. Yet billions are spent on getting those TV ads in front of you.

    But more importantly, spam is CHEAP. So who cares, "give the trailer trash another $100 to send another 100M messages we're too busy to figure out if it's worth the lousy 100 bucks" you can imagine the advertiser saying.

    And spamming is cheap because spammers sell stolen facilities: Open relays, hijacked PC zombies, open proxies, holes in CGI scripts, etc.

    If they were making money they'd have their own facilities to spam from rather than basing their entire business on all this criminal behavior.

    Finally, maybe it's because spam DOESN'T work that it's so virulent? Spammers have to charge a lousy $100 or so per customer to rope them in at the chump change price so need hundreds of customers to survive. And also have enormous churn as the advertisers find spamming doesn't work and worse cause them problems from irate victims so spammers have to keep finding new customers? That fits the facts also.

    The Wall Street Journal should know better than to publish junk reasoning like this, or at least consider other possibilities in their article.

  222. multi-show stories by theantix · · Score: 1

    It was "too hard" for Joe Denomenator to follow multi-show stories.

    Guess what, Buck-o... if you aren't a dedicated watcher of the show, multi-show stories are impossible to watch. If I had a choice between watching a single mid-season episode of Andromeda or a stupid reality show, at least the stupid reality show would be watchable as it's own entity.

    The problem is with the medium of broadcast television, not with the viewers. It's near impossible to have a popular show with long storyline arcs because most people have lives that interfere with watching every single episode in the correct order week after week.

    The rescue is here, however, because DVD sales for those types of shows have been very successful. I bet the DVD sales for an unpopular television show like Babylon 5 would outpace a DVD release of Joe Millionaire.

    Today, shows like 24 and the Sopranos release the DVD editions pretty soon after the season has gone off the air, making the shows more financially successful and encouraging more of them to be made. It's a compromise that means that the shows you like can be more complicated and survive enough for financial success. I suggest you stop whining about what other people watch on TV and just be thankful that the next Babylon 5 will be able to get long story arcs thanks to DVD sales.

    --
    501 Not Implemented
    1. Re:multi-show stories by Obfuscant · · Score: 1
      Guess what, Buck-o.

      My name's not "Buck-o".

      ...if you aren't a dedicated watcher of the show, multi-show stories are impossible to watch.

      Which does not argue against them being made, only against you spending your time watching them. I suppose you assume that you should be able to watch any show that pops up on your telly without having to exert any effort to think about it, but some of us don't make that assumption. Some of us allow that other people might like things we don't. Please do us the courtesy of doing the same.

      I suggest you stop whining about what other people watch on TV...

      If I wanted to whine about what other people watch on TV I could easily do so, and you'd know the difference when you saw it.

      What I was doing was using several examples of the 'lowest common denominator' effect to back up a statement that we shouldn't expect any better after Joe Denominator got his right to access the Internet. Sorry I confused you.

    2. Re:multi-show stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you people equate a long plot line with "something you have to think about"?

      Soap operas have the longest fricken plot line ever. Why? To capture the audience of shut-in house wives with no life so they can't miss an episode so they don't miss anything important.

      Basically you are asking for an outer space soap opera! If Days Of Our Lives was on a space station would you find it "intellectual"?

      Face it, you got no life so you try to substitute the people on the TV for a life. It's ok lot's of shut-ins with no life watch them, just don't kid yourself into think they are "intellectual" or require any kind of serious contemplation.

      I swear they really should do a Days Of Our Lives In Space then they can get the house wives and the losers who turn to technology to fill the gaping holes in their life.

  223. Spam Trap by cerebralpc · · Score: 1

    I enabled Spam Trap http://www.spamtrap.net.au yesterday for the main email account at work.
    Instead of 43 spams and 4 emails we got just 4 emails this morning.
    Seems to work well although I'm not 100% sure yet.
    Costs $33/year which is OK for an office environment.

  224. Re:Common Denominators (Mod the parent up) by $criptah · · Score: 1

    Excellent! You said it the right way but unfortunately there is nothing we can do about it. Remeber, the United States of American is a country where people free to do what they want to do. I totally support you, unfortunately for one person like yourself there are 100 "denominators" that will disagree with you until they die.

    Moreover, there are a lot of smart people who are interested in keeping people stupid because stupid and uneducated tend not to bitch about stuff as long as you keep on enterntaining them.

  225. Here is his email address by TheJavaGuy · · Score: 1

    His email address is support@dduo.com Go ahead, send forward him ALL the spam you receive.

    --
    Opera Watch - An Opera browser blog.
  226. Re:Heres his PHONE NUMBER!!!!!!!!! by dsjoerg · · Score: 1

    Line's busy. Try again later.

  227. 150 spams a day ? by clarkie.mg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From the article : Mr. Soto routinely comes home to some 150 e-mail pitches, and he loves getting them all.

    It's been said before : "Spam is not a problem, just hit delete, it takes less than a second".

    In this case, the guy takes the time to read the messages. Ok, it means he can handle more spams than most internet users. But everyone has a limit. And every mailbox has a limit. How would he react if he had 1500 emails a day ? 15000 ?

    Spammers have no limits, they send billions of messages : This article says AOL blocked 500 billion messages in 2003 and it's increasing.

    --
    Men are born ignorant, not stupid; they are made stupid by education. Bertrand Russel
  228. Its also great for collecting viruses :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have two accounts i stopped using due to spam, i was going to close them till last week all sorts of viruses started coming through.
    Since i run linux and not swinedos i found it rather amusing and decided to leave the two account, seems like spam is also usefull
    as a virus gathering tool heheheh.
    I used to collect those i came across while working in it, now spammers send them to me :)

  229. spam is marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SPAM is marketing. It is a sales tool. Just because you have attached a label to it does not change its essential character of being a marketing tool.

    As long as it brings in more money than it cost it will be an effective selling tool.

    So get over it! :)

  230. 2 rings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now you only get 2 rings, stupid d20 system

  231. Lucky Duckies by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Lucky Duckies by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 1
      The WSJ's "Lucky Duckies" aren't the folks at the bottom. They're the people in the "middle" who WHINE and WHINE and WHINE about their taxes but, because of deductions for dependent children, state taxes, and mortgage, only pay about 15% tax.

      The real victims are productive folk making between, say, $150,000 and $300,000 who are SALARIED. In a state like CA, they're hit with the AMT. They end up paying a total of about 50% tax (state, fed AMT, Social Security, Sales combined), and there are NO BREAKS for them.

      Only the SUPER RICH and the "Lucky Duckies" win. The republicans throw bones to the Lucky Duckies (and have them beleive stories like the one about "frivilous lawsuits" ruining everything) because without that broad base, they'd never get elected.

  232. Elmer Fudd raping Porky Pig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    q.e.d.

  233. At least... by WookieinHeat · · Score: 0

    They included a picture for us to give to the hitmen.

  234. Not exactly by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    I guess this proves that there really is something for everyone online.

    No, it just proves that, after pulling ourselves out of the primordial ooze eons ago, achieving sentience, and then spending millenia working towards an advanced civilization, after all of that ... there is still a sucker born every minute. As powerful a tool for enlightenment as the Internet has proven it can be, this just goes to show that, nothing, really, has changed.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  235. So... by -kertrats- · · Score: 1

    How many African kings/presidents/nobles is he keeping millions for while their country keeps them in hiding?

    --
    The Braying and Neighing of Barnyard Animals Follows.
  236. Re:Heres his PHONE NUMBER!!!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please don't harass him... he seems to have more than enough personal problems as it is.

  237. It needs to happen by SteveXE · · Score: 1

    Someone needs to kicks this guys and anyone else who buys stuff from spam ass's asap. Sooner or later he is going to get screwed on a spam scam and i hope its a big one a really really big one.

  238. Lowest Common Denominator? by Rufus88 · · Score: 1

    What's a "lowest common denominator"?

    I know what a GREATEST common denominator is, and what a least common MULTIPLE is, but this term is foreign to me.

  239. Re: He may be lying, the by Dimensio · · Score: 1

    1. Spammers lie
    2. ???
    3. Spammers are STOOPID


    Rule #2: When a spammer is telling you something, remember rule #1.

  240. I have that encryptor! by mekkab · · Score: 1

    Awesome. I really must find out how he's managed to develop an encryption algorythm which is already understood by every browser including Netscape 1.1N but which is completely uncrackable by human beings!


    Oh that's easy. Its called Microsoft Front Page!
    Have you seen the nested tables belched by that thing? gross!

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  241. His employer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Mr. Soto's daily spamfest starts after he gets home from his $40,000-a-year job as a building supervisor at NYRE Management, a real-estate firm that runs Manhattan apartment buildings.


    According to the article, in order to break even, 1 in 10,000 spams need to be responded to. In this guy's case, they aren't breaking even, but making good money from him. So he's responsible for a multiple of 10,000 spam messages.

    How does NYRE Management feel about an employee responsible for perhaps a 100,000 spam messages daily? And someone who spams himself?

    NYRE Management corp. 332 East 95th street, NY, NY, 10128 tel : (212) 360 6030, fax : (212) 360 7479.

    With the grandmother spammer story a couple months ago, and this grandfather spammer story now, I wonder if this is an organized effort to soften up possible jail sentences they are now worried about due to the Can Spam Act, and the fact that they aren't as technically knowledgeable as Richter and Barry Head & Family and Bernard Balan et al.

  242. Re:Heres his PHONE NUMBER!!!!!!!!! by herdingcats · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hell's Kitchen. Figures.

  243. He's not a spam lover.. he's a spammer by mabu · · Score: 1

    This is likely a classic profile of a spammer, not even a nutty fringe consumer. This gives you insight into the type of temperament spammers have. He is a spammer by his own admission and he also admits he hasn't made any money at it.

    So what we've learned here is:

    1. Spammer's like spam (duh)

    2. Spammer's don't make money, and now they have to stoop to showing this dork as an example of perhaps the 11 idiots (aside form spammers) on the planet who think spam is good.

    3. Spammer's are unfocused and mentally unstable.

    4. WSJ has lost the last sliver of journalistic integrity it ever had.

    5. Slashdot has turned into a tabloid web site, calling attention to goofy freaks in order to generate more attention, regardless of whether the article is informative or newsworthy.

    6. Spammers everywhere are laughing their asses off that they have so successfully manipulated the media, as everyone from the WSJ to TechTV picked up this stupid story and made it larger than life, as well as didn't call adequate attention to the fact that this guy is a spammer and has played the media for the gullible, sensationalistic fools that they are.

  244. confusion by theantix · · Score: 1

    My point was, and remains to be, something that seems to be eluding you. The nature of the medium of broadcast television leads to simple shows that don't require much backstory or effort in order to understand what is going on. You call this the effect of the lowest common denominator, but in fact you are incorrect. DVD sales show that people actually want to watch the good shows that didn't perform on television, which nullifies your whinge about reality shows.

    The internet is an altogther different medium and the same rules will not apply to it. If (when) the internet is used as a distribution vehicle for mass-media filmed entertainment the viewer may be able to watch shows in proper context, allowing for more complex plotlines to be constructed. This does not mean that Joe Millionairre of the Internet won't exist, something like that will exist, or more likely an even more stupid version of it. But it will also lead to a venue to provide even more intelligent programming than we can get today -- and quite likely someone will provide it.

    I hope you are no longer confused. I'm here to help if you still have more problems or questions.

    --
    501 Not Implemented
    1. Re:confusion by autechre · · Score: 1

      I was amused that when I got my Firefly DVD set, it had a little ad brochure for "Fox DVDs". Almost every show advertised had been canceled or screwed over by Fox (or by wherever it ended up after Fox). Hello? Did you think we didn't know? I love how it describes Firefly as "brilliant." Not brilliant enough for a whole season, apparently.

      Shows like Stargate SG-1 get around the "problem" of multi-show storylines somewhat via "Previously on Stargate SG-1...", but even then you might feel a bit lost if you don't know any of the back story. I mean, it's difficult to get any sort of character or real plot development into just one hour. To have a good show, you're going to need some back story, but the show also has to be interesting enough to hook you into going to one of the online fan sites and/or buying some DVDs to catch up if you jump in at the middle.

      --
      WMBC freeform/independent online radio.
  245. SPAM-free products!!! by fugue · · Score: 1

    Now, look for specially-marked packages: "No spammers were encouraged in the making of this product".

    --
    "The biggest problem with communication is the illusion that it has taken place."
  246. If he was responding ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to all the spam I get, he'd be wearing a bra with size E cups and his male organ would be dragging on the floor!

  247. No, wait! He's a genious! by spoco2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    He can spell: "Now Only $67 INITIAL and $12 Per Month Thereafter... Cancell anytime!"
    He has fantastic grammer: "Please Note: These packages are available seperate."
    This is funny too: "We Found the Best products & Values then Added even More to it!..." You added even more values? Really? Like how about some damn values like 'morality' and 'honour'...

    What a disgrace.

  248. The voice of reason. by neurojab · · Score: 5, Informative

    DON'T harass this guy. If you do, you're certainly worse than any spammer.

    Yes, he's contributing to the spam problem (probably without realizing it), but it's not like he's going around clubbing baby seals. He just has an unhealthy shopping addiction. Calling and harassing people is not going to solve anything. Instead, write an article on "why responding to SPAM is BAD" and get it printed. Do something constructive.

    Editors: Please remove the post containing his phone number. This kind of crap is giving Slashdot a bad name.

  249. Is this a joke? by iamhassi · · Score: 1
    from article:
    "But it's the bargains that keep him devouring spam, including a $150 metal detector he recently bought."

    is this a joke? Could a person this stupid really exist? There was a story about a guy who replaced $3000 worth of dual processor G5 Mac with $300 worth of PC parts that turned out to be a hoax so that's why I'm doubtful. Could this just be another prank to get hits? I mean the story did end up on slashdot, and I know it's the Wall Street Journal but I've learned no one is above scams for advertising dollars.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  250. my litte chat with Mr. Soto via TTY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    USER: SPRINT RELAY 4126@ DIALING 212-399-0626 RINGING 1 ... 2 ... 3 ... 4 ... 5 ... (F) HELLO UM CAN U HOLD ON FOR A SECOND.. (M) HELLO YEAH IM GONNA CALL U RIGHT BACK SIR YEAH GA

    OPER: no i think that ill call you back, mr. soto you can count on it ga

    USER: WHO IS THIS MIGHT I ASK QQ GA

    OPER: we have powerful friends mr. soto and we dont fuck around you will be contacted later ga

    USER: WONDERFUL TO ME STORY WAS MISQUOTED COMPLETELY IN WALL STREET JOURNAL GA

    OPER: what ever just keep looking behnd your back sk sk

  251. Ever receive a postage-due snail mail ad? by fmaxwell · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's like saying your against junk *snail* mail.

    How can people still not get it?

    When you recieve an ad via snail-mail, the sender has paid the postage. He's paid for the paper it's printed on. When you receive spam, the spammer has stolen your bandwidth, your ISP's bandwidth, your ISP's storage, administrative costs, etc. And your ISP doesn't get to bill the spammer. The ISP passes the costs on to you. When the ISP has to upgrade add more bandwidth to handle the spam, who do you think pays for that? Spammers? What about when the ISP adds on three more mail servers or another four-drive SCSI RAID array to deal with the spam? Do you think the penis enlarger guys are going to chip in to pay the costs?

    Who the hell moderated the parent post as insightful? Are they giving moderator points out at crack houses?

  252. Re:Heres his PHONE NUMBER!!!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for the advertising moron. This is Mr Soto and i would like to explain that
    I was misquoted in the srticle because i never spammed in my life nor do i have any intentions to. At one timme i used optin mail list to promote one site. I have hence called the writer of the article and she confirmed my wording optin and we are trying to retract it.I am just a sei handicapped grandfather looking to add additional income for mmy fammily so all the cruel things written in this forum only proves how fast people can assume things. My websites are legitimate entireprises hand built and offer
    real value.

  253. Which reason is that? by fm6 · · Score: 1
    DON'T harass this guy. If you do, you're certainly worse than any spammer.
    Question is, what precisely does this dude consider harassment? He probably wouldn't mind us calling, as long as we tried to sel him something!
  254. Re:Heres his PHONE NUMBER!!!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't you mean "Clinton"? ;)

  255. Proof that civilization defeats natural selection by leereyno · · Score: 1

    The only reason why people like this are alive in the first place is because civilization protects those who would not otherwise be able to meet the challenge of survival. Ever wonder where the people on Jerry Springer come from? Now you know. If it wasn't for civilzation people like that wouldn't live long enough to breed, let alone proliferate into an army of the genetically challenged.

    In a perfect world foolishness and stupidity would be fatal past a certain point.

    Lee

    --
    Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
  256. Re:Heres his PHONE NUMBER!!!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At one timme i used optin mail list to promote one site. ...

    ...My websites are legitimate entireprises hand built and offer real value.

    Oh yeah... He's one of them.

  257. Reminds me of the Stone cutters episode by h0mi · · Score: 1


    Moe: We've got to kill him!
    Number One: Take it easy, Moe. Let's hear from the Stonecutter world council before we act too rashly.
    Orville: Kill him.
    Nicholson: Kill him.
    Mr. T: Kill the fool!
    Bush: I'm afraid I have to disagree with Orville, Jack, and Mr. Can't we just do something to his voice box?

  258. Stop spam dead in its tracks! Restricted charset! by iamcf13 · · Score: 2

    See my website (see sig) for more details.

    My program has no need for CPU taxing Bayesian filtering in the traditional sense--it uses simple pattern-matching against two wordlists to quickly deem an email as spam.

    Restricting unapproved email senders to only alphabetic characters and 'spaces' makes it
    impossible for spammers to easily hawk their wares.

    These are two of the cold, brutal, logical ideas implemented in my software email filter (see sig).

    I get no spam this way. The 'false positives' I do get are deemed spam but that is because the unapproved sender doesn't yet know about my email policy and/or the program that implements it.

  259. Taxes? On $40K? by way2muchsense · · Score: 1

    Find me somebody who pays more than half of a $40,000 gross income in taxes, and show me his tax returns. Methinks thou art full of it.

  260. To detect spam, analyze the email headers. by iamcf13 · · Score: 1

    That is one of the things my program does that I use. To read more about it, go here.

    Unfortunately, my program downloads an processes all email to avoid deleting a 'false positive' at the server level after email header analysis. To make up for that, all spam is routed to two files and all spam attachments are clearly identified so all the spam can be perused and deleted with ease.

  261. Re:Taxes? On $40K? by RLW · · Score: 1

    I can't show you his tax returns becase as you know that is private information. However, we can make best case scenarios and run 40k through the tax code.
    He's married and there's no mention of kids. That sets up the dependents. He's also a building super so he probably does not have a mortgage as his housing is provided. Which the fair market value of should count as income on his tax returns but we don't know what that is so that can't be considered. Also if he's the super he's probably not disabled and since he reads e-mail he's not blind. His wife's status on these points is unknown so in the absence of knowledge we'll go with the most likely case that she's not either.
    Ok he pays 8.25 percent tax on everything he buys in the form of a sales tax. That is one of the highest sales taxes in the country. He is also supposed to fill out a form and pay that sales tax on purchases made from items shipped to his home address when that tax in not collected but I doubt this actually happens.
    He also pays 7.25 percent state income tax and 7.25 city income tax. Generally state and in the rare city income tax schedule one gets the same deductions as the federal income tax. So he gets his personal decution and two boxes on the dependent chart. Now the IRS lest you deduct local and state income and property taxes but since 3.6k is less than the standard deduction of 9.5k he should use that instead. Combine that with his two deductions which total 6.1k and you 15.6k. Subtract 15.6k from 40k and you get 24.4k.
    The city will want 1.8k
    The state will want the same 1.8k
    The IRS will want 3.14k
    Let's see that brings the total to 6.74k.
    Not as much as I thought orriginally but the state and city combined get more out of him than the feds do. ouch. Tack on his sales tax and other hidden taxes (attached to phone service, utilities, etc) I bet he pays about a 20-25% of his income in taxes.

  262. Mod Up! Insigtful and well written! by iamcf13 · · Score: 1

    World Leader's post addresses the core issue that drives spam: Desparation borne out of a insatiable desire to make a quick buck.

    I, on the other hand, have decided to 'take the high road' and not resort to spamming in order to promote my solution to the spam problem (see sig).

    I belive I have 'invented the better mousetrap' to deal with email spam and I have, for example, limited myself to sending clearly identified small emails for my online product press release to potentially interested parties in the media at large.

    If my efforts above are construed as spamming, and an (internet) ad campaign is beyond my budget, and outright spamming (or any other such unsolicited email contact) is out of the question, then what can I do to tell large numbers of other people about my product?

    Please do not suggest venture capitalism as a possible solution as I would then be subject to a Wall Street 'the profit is all' mentality. That is to say I've found a real need via firsthand experience and crafted an effective solution to that need to the best of my abilities. I leave it up to the public at large to decide for themselves if that is the case.

  263. Wrong by yudan · · Score: 1

    They are greedy, and definitely won't be satisfied even if everyone on earth buy the product from them! Maybe they will send some spams to Martian people as well, like this one:

    ---
    From: goodgirl@penislarge.earth
    To: poormartian@smallpenis.mars

    Want a big penis? Take a trip to Earth and find out how!

    Book your ticket at penislarge.earth
    ---