Slashdot Mirror


iPod: This Season's Must-Have for Muggers

KH writes "West Midlands police have issued a stark warning to iPod users: ditch the white headphones or pay the price." Apparently, muggers recognize the headphones and target passersby for muggage.

725 of 993 comments (clear)

  1. Mugging by panxerox · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well people will kill each other over sneakers so to mug for an Ipod doesn't surprise me. From the article: "The Sun quotes one iPod representative as saying: "There are guys who?d rather be robbed than change the color of the headphones." " = Darwin strikes again.

    --
    "It's so convenient to have a system where everyone is a criminal" - A. Hitler
    1. Re:Mugging by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm going to buy some white headphones for my 4lb 1996 Sony Discman. Maybe finally I'll get a chance to try out this new tazer I bought on Ebay...

      --

      My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    2. Re:Mugging by Liselle · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, I guess that's one advantage of the iPod's high price. Since I'm not the type to carry around $400 in cash, I bought it with my CC, and that gives me a bit of theft protection. :P

      --
      Auto-reply to ACs: "Truly, you have a dizzying intellect."
    3. Re:Mugging by MikeXpop · · Score: 1, Funny

      On the opposite side of the spectrum...

      Headline: "Got a crappy mp3 player? Want to make people think you're cool and important? Just hide it and wear iPod headphones! You'll be the talk of the town!"

      --
      Etiquette is etiquette. He kills his mother but he can't wear grey trousers.
    4. Re:Mugging by sben · · Score: 5, Insightful
      The Sun quotes one iPod representative as saying: "There are guys who'd rather be robbed than change the color of the headphones."
      Or, some of us would rather not base our lives around media fearmongering.
    5. Re:Mugging by proj_2501 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      oh, it's better to get stabbed over a piece of perfectly-replaceable machinery?

    6. Re:Mugging by DR+SoB · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Given that answer I'd say he DOES live in NY, and is probably aching to just have the guy armed with a knife mug him as opposed to the usual gun.. (Or he's got a CCW permit..)

      --
      Mod +5 Drunk
    7. Re:Mugging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Indeed. If we ditch the white headphones, the robbers will have won. In the war against robbery, we must continue to wear our earphones and go on with our daily lives.

    8. Re:Mugging by lazuli42 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Changing the color of the headphones won't help much. Muggers will just start targeting joggers that wear Blueberry, Tangerine, Lime, Grape, Stawberry, or Bondi Blue headphones.

      --

      "There's companies that are just so cool that you just can't even deal with it," - Bill Gates, about Google

    9. Re:Mugging by Coryoth · · Score: 4, Interesting

      So basically people just want to show off - its expensive, and they want to demonstrate that they have a real iPod, not some cheap knock-off player. Pitching to peoples pride an narcissism has always been a marketing winner - that's why distinctive headphones are so good.

      Compare this with cellphones - the status is in how small they are. Hard to show off how small something is: if it's really small it hides invisibly in your pocket. Personally I think this is where a lot of the whole "Digital Camera on a cell phone" came from... it's a new status symbol element showing off how expensive your cell phone is, but it's quite easy to show off - just go around taking pictures of everything.

      Jedidiah.

    10. Re:Mugging by Beatbyte · · Score: 4, Funny

      don't be bitter you got mugged and lost your iPod ;-)

    11. Re:Mugging by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 2, Informative

      If he lives in NYC, he doesn't have a CCW. The only people who carry there are cops and criminals.

    12. Re:Mugging by hambonewilkins · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You've obviously never been mugged. It's not something to look forward to.

      --

      God Bless America. Why? Did it sneeze?
    13. Re:Mugging by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or pack it with C4 and a remote detonator.

      Get mugged, then help clean up the gene pool!

    14. Re:Mugging by cioxx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'll be damned if this isn't true. Prior to Apple introducing the White in-ear headphones, iPod users were buying Japanese imported Sony MDR-EX71SL headphones at really high premiums just so they didn't have to wear the black variety which is available in the states.

      White headphones are like a status symbol now. I'm not sure if it's sad or funny.

      (Full Disclosure: iPod + white headphones managed to brainwash me also)

    15. Re:Mugging by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      well, apparently some guys would rather base their lives around judging peoples coolness solely on the fact if they have ipod headphones or not(the guy quoted on the article). come on, the guy practically said that even if you were the fattest , ugliest, stupidiest most ignorant asshole you'd be cool if you had an ipod(or rather, if you had the headphones).

      it's not like they're the absolute best headphones around anyways.

      though, if you're in area where getting mugged is a problem maybe the first problem is walking around while all noise to your ears is blocked out(especially while you look 'cool')? maybe their next warning is that pickpockets like ipods as well.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    16. Re:Mugging by DR+SoB · · Score: 1

      Notice the word "or"?

      --
      Mod +5 Drunk
    17. Re:Mugging by (54)T-Dub · · Score: 1

      RFID Tags anyone??? Oh shoot, i think i hear the foil patrol knocking on my door. Damn that Michael is quick.

      --

      "I can not bring myself to believe that if knowledge presents danger, the solution is ignorance" - Isaac Asimov
    18. Re:Mugging by Joecuba · · Score: 3, Funny

      You insensitive clod! He was joking!!

    19. Re:Mugging by jdreed1024 · · Score: 1

      Joke's on them if they try that on me. I have some Sony wraparound headphones for my iPod. I mostly use my iPod earbuds on my crappy 10-year-old walkman that only outputs sound on the left channel. The muggers are welcome to it :-)

      --
      There is no sig, there is only Zuul.
    20. Re:Mugging by Rallion · · Score: 5, Funny

      In all seriousness, I'd love a chance to really try out a tazer, even if it involved getting mugged. Really.

      "Give me your--"

      *bzzt* *thud*

      "AWESOME!"

    21. Re:Mugging by Uber+Banker · · Score: 1

      Well, a knife can kill just as well as a gun... equal capacity at close range. And many criminals in the UK carry guns (perhaps more organised, but remember that spate of killings recently via gun for mobile phones... some killed were kids).

      I find a gun scarier (on an emotional level), but having trained in kung fu for the past 8 years at short distance (up to 12" beyond arm length) I don't see much difference in the lethality of a gun and a knife in the hand of a determined criminal upon Joe Average. I guess what it comes down to is that it is easy to pull a trigger but an inexperienced attacked may hesitate killing with their own hand. Still... a knife is deadly (deep stab in the thigh equals dead in 30 seconds... slash across the throat equals dead in seconds... stab in the belly could mean dead in 2 minutes... stab in the chest could puncture all four chambers of your heart - seconds).

    22. Re:Mugging by Vellmont · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The fact remains that you're walking around with a 300-500 device with you that's easy to sell and run off with. If you advertise the fact that you don't have just a cheap walkman, you will increase your chances of being mugged.

      Walk around in the wrong neighborhood with those distintive headphones, and you could quite easily be mugged. Do you walk around with a big fat wallet with hundred dollar bills sticking out because worries about being robbed are only "media fearmongering"?

      --
      AccountKiller
    23. Re:Mugging by damiena · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you outlaw white earphones, only outlaws will have white earphones.

    24. Re:Mugging by selfabuse · · Score: 5, Funny

      just so long as his next words weren't going to be "license, registration and proof of insurance"

    25. Re:Mugging by Frymaster · · Score: 4, Funny
      You've obviously never been mugged.

      mugged? i thought the only people who ripped off apple was microsoft.

    26. Re:Mugging by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Lol. They should add this to those commercials...You know, shadow of a person dancing around with white headphones...Shadow of another person sneaking up on them...Wham! Talkin 'bout my generation!

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    27. Re:Mugging by phoneyman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Tazers and other "stun guns" are a waste of time and complete garbage for civilian self-defence. They work for cops because cops have batons, pepper spray, guns and backup to go along with them.

      My understanding is that they work mainly with pain compliance (despite what the dreck^H^H^H^H^Hmarketting literature says), and pain compliance is not a tool I would choose to use on a mugger. Drunk Uncle Bob, sure.

      Pierre

    28. Re:Mugging by mlh1996 · · Score: 1
      I've used a taser. On myself. It doesn't work.


      Now, the police models are quite a bit more powerful, but they aren't the end-all, be-all that people make it out to be.


      Pepper spray does work, but only as "an eye jab in a can," as a friend of mine says. Spray 'em and run.

      --
      Lack of creativity is no excuse for not having a .sig
    29. Re:Mugging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Usually the punk with the knife is more likely to want to cause pain than the punk with the gun. I've put them both down and away (IALEO (Law Enforcement Officer)), the punks with the knives know that they will have to get in close to do anything, the punks with the guns are in it for the quick 'scare' from a distance. UNLESS they're dopers or pros. Dopers are completely unpredictable except about being unpredictable; and if Joe Citizen runs into a pro it's probably over already. Generally speaking, there's not many material goods worth (risking) dying for.

    30. Re:Mugging by geekboy2k · · Score: 1

      This is an interesting commentary. In light of the "Craigslist wh0r3s" story (people were literally renting their bodies to get an iPod in NY) we see that having an iPod is a status symbol. So, what's to prevent people from just wearing the white earbuds? It's not any different than any other "poseur".

    31. Re:Mugging by theantix · · Score: 2, Funny

      Eh, why stop there? We need to take a pre-emptive measure and kill anyone who we can prove has a knife on them* and looks at an iPod owner in a manner that can be interpreted as threatening.

      Note:
      * completely fabricated evidence should still count as proof, if we really don't like them.

      --
      501 Not Implemented
    32. Re:Mugging by prockcore · · Score: 4, Informative

      My understanding is that they work mainly with pain compliance (despite what the dreck^H^H^H^H^Hmarketting literature says), and pain compliance is not a tool I would choose to use on a mugger.

      Then you misunderstand them. It paralyzes you. Your muscles cramp up and you can't move. It's not that the pain is so bad, it's that the signals coming from your brain telling your muscles to move are being drowned out by the signals coming from the tazer.

      Tazers work.. even on people pumped up on PCP.

    33. Re:Mugging by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      While you're at it, make you sure you buy some white cotton balls and some antiseptic in case the mugger pulls a little too hard on the cord.

    34. Re:Mugging by Ion+Berkley · · Score: 1

      Intestingly enough I recall when I bought my IPOD I chuckled at Apples custom laser engraving service thinking hell why not spend even more $$$ on this thing!! Suddenly I see that indelable name and address etc burned into the steel case in a whole different light, making these things at least a little trackable should they ever be recovered by police or offered for sale on EBay etc...

    35. Re:Mugging by cscx · · Score: 1

      Well, for $85 total I bought a USB MiniDisc player and a nice pair of Sennheiser earbuds. Not only am I happier than all the yuppies I see on public transportation with their white headphones, I'm also $250 richer.

      Look guys, would you rather dish out another $250 for an iPod you could easily drop and break? Just think -- you know how much fraternity-grade beer $250 can buy? I could have a permanent hangover for the next 40 years.

    36. Re:Mugging by comedian23 · · Score: 1

      I'll try it out on you if you really want to see what it does, as long as I get to post a digital pic of the results on slashdot afterwards.

      Seriously tho, everyone is saying they aren't effective. So what is everyone's home defense preferences, beyond the obvious gun? Pepper spray? Katana? Chainsaw? Pure HCl in a vial by the bed? Tell me what is a good choice.

    37. Re:Mugging by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Spoken like a man that has never had 60,000 volts go thru them. I don't know what they are selling where you're at but these motherf*ckers make you loose *all* control of your bodily functions, for 30-40 seconds (i.e. hope you brought a change of clothes) & unlike pepper spray no amount of training in the world can prepare you be electricuted. Who needs pain when you have involuntary reflexes.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    38. Re:Mugging by phoneyman · · Score: 5, Informative

      Anecdotal evidence says otherwise. I've talked to cops that use them, and have had them used on themselves, and the comments are that it hurts - not that it paralyzes. Of the commonly available "stun" weapons, the Tazer is indeed the best, but they aren't reliable stoppers.

      I've talked to so many people who have been zapped from everything from garden variety stun guns like gramma had in "Die Hard II" to the much ballyhooed Myotron and the common denominator is that they hurt.

      I'd personally be more than willing to get "stunned" by any available electrical "paralysis" garbage on the market, and I'd be willing to bet that I could close in on the stunner and clinch them while they stun me. I'd be willing to be that I could fully demonstrate ability and motive to continue an assault, and prove that if I were an assailant the "stun gun" would be a meaningless tool for self-defence.
      really disabling the nervous system is also capable of stopping the heart and killing the attacker. Thus, you might as well use a weapon that is designed to do just that.

      I can get to Washington State, so if anyone wants to take me up on this you provide the stun weapons and I'll provide the flesh.

      Pierre

    39. Re:Mugging by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      LOL, my friend (a SEAL, hi Brent!) says it goes good on tacos too.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    40. Re:Mugging by System.out.println() · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Right now, the muggers see "white" and think "iPod". What do you think when you see purple headphones? I think "teenager with a $15 CD walkman."

      There won't be enough people switching to not-white headphones to change muggers' general perceptions of iPods, I'll bet.

    41. Re:Mugging by sben · · Score: 1

      You're right, I am increasing my chances of being mugged. And I may look at things differently if that ever happens to me.

      But right now, there's little benefit to worrying about getting mugged -- little enough that I've decided not to.

      No, I'm not going to walk around in the "wrong neighborhood" in the middle of the night and drop $100s on the ground and block my hearing with those pretty white earphones. That would be begging for trouble. But in a well-trafficked downtown area in broad daylight? Eh. I'll take the chance. You can choose not to, if that's more appropriate for your temperament and situation.

    42. Re:Mugging by phoneyman · · Score: 1

      Are you speaking from experience?

      I'm more than willing to have you shock me with the commercially available stun gun of your choice to prove my point; in fact, I'd consider it a valuable training opportunity.

      Pierre

    43. Re:Mugging by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Pepper spray is OC, OC stands for Oleoresin Capsicum, the same stuff that's in habanero and jalapeno peppers (among most others.) You could certainly put a little of it in your chili for effect, but putting it on tacos is just showing off.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    44. Re:Mugging by Llywelyn · · Score: 4, Funny

      You've obviously never gotten a joke. It's something to look forward to.

      --
      Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
    45. Re:Mugging by YOU+LIKEWISE+FAIL+IT · · Score: 2, Insightful
      the much ballyhooed Myotron

      Which apparently has just ceased to be.

      --
      One god, one market, one truth, one consumer.
    46. Re:Mugging by monkeydo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      By all means, engrave your address on it. That way when you get mugged, the vicious criminal knows where to go for more high priced consumer electronics. Why not just write down the serial number?

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum
      The only thing more annoying than a Libertarian is an (un|mis)informed Libertarian
    47. Re:Mugging by Shakrai · · Score: 1
      Seriously tho, everyone is saying they aren't effective. So what is everyone's home defense preferences, beyond the obvious gun? Pepper spray? Katana? Chainsaw? Pure HCl in a vial by the bed? Tell me what is a good choice.

      I find that my batleth works pretty well -- or the phaser if I don't feel like cleaning up a big mess.

      Though in all seriousness why knock the "obvious gun" off the list? 12 gage pump shotgun -- chances are you won't even have to use the thing -- once they hear you pump that bad boy they won't be able to get out of your house fast enough. I'm sure the handgun advocates will chime in with supposedly better solutions but I'll stick with my trusty 12 gage.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    48. Re:Mugging by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      "Suddenly I see that indelable name and address etc burned into the steel case in a whole different light, making these things at least a little trackable should they ever be recovered by police or offered for sale on EBay etc..."

      Sure. Then the mugger sees your name and address burned into the iPod, thinks "Gee, if this guy can drop $300 on a music player, he must have lots of neat stuff!", and pays you another visit a few days later.

    49. Re:Mugging by YOU+LIKEWISE+FAIL+IT · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Move somewhere peaceful. Support your local police.

      --
      One god, one market, one truth, one consumer.
    50. Re:Mugging by Kpt+Kill · · Score: 1

      Pump em full of paintball rounds at 10 feet... now where you would conceal a 03 Angel on you is beyond me, however, perhaps carrying it around the mugger wouldn't concider you as easy of a target

    51. Re:Mugging by Snocone · · Score: 5, Funny

      Here's an easy way to get the same effect.

      1) Locate a dairy farm that uses electric fences to restrain cattle. You can tell it's an electric fence because it's one thin strand of wire at waist height strung through plastic insulators on the fence posts, and the cows are giving it a rather wide berth.
      2) Walk up to the electric fence.
      3) Whip out your dick.
      4) Piss on the electric fence.

      This, I posit, will remove *all* further desire on your part to play with high voltage electricity. For that matter, it will take a fair while afterwards for you to regain ANY "desire" to "play", if you know what I mean and I think you do.

    52. Re:Mugging by Beek · · Score: 3, Funny

      You've got it all wrong... In the year 2004, we would kill anyone who can't prove they don't have a knife on them.

    53. Re:Mugging by Shakrai · · Score: 1
      For home defense a shotgun is the prefered weapon. And a handgun; to get to the shotgun in case it isn't nearby when you need it. For out and about, a Shorty.

      Damn you beat me to the punch. Rat bastard! Too bad my state won't let me carry the shorty :( What's the best defensive weapon to use when you can't carry a gun?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    54. Re:Mugging by Xeleema · · Score: 5, Funny

      just so long as his next words weren't going to be "license, registration and proof of insurance"

      No, especially if it's "...license, registration, and proof of insurance."
      Those identity theives are real clever.

      --
      "When I am king, you will be first against the wall..."
    55. Re:Mugging by hondo77 · · Score: 1

      White headphones are like a status symbol now.

      That would make sense. I replaced mine with some Sony clip-on things as soon as I got my iPod, shortly after they came out. I have some sixth sense about how not to win friends and influence people.

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    56. Re:Mugging by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      Speaking of tasers...

    57. Re:Mugging by prockcore · · Score: 2, Informative

      really disabling the nervous system is also capable of stopping the heart and killing the attacker.

      The ACLU agrees with you.

      But your anecdotal evidence doesn't impress me. I've seen enough articles like this and enough TV news to see that they're consistant. I've never seen anyone tased that can continue to move. Everyone describes it the exact same way.

      In fact the only people who I've heard say tasers don't work are anonymous people on bulletin boards who want to place bets that they wouldn't be effected.

    58. Re:Mugging by ePhil_One · · Score: 2, Insightful
      And remember not to flash your headlights at idiots who dont have their headlights on at night because they might really be gang memebers who will follow you home and kill you.

      While this wouldn't the the first time Apple products were targeted by theives, it has the funny sound of geurrilla marketing by Dell or some other competitor. "Yeah, we'll spread a rumor that their product causes cancer! No, they wont buy that. I know, muggers, no NY City muggers will come to your town and kill you for your iPod."

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
    59. Re:Mugging by __aajqwr7439 · · Score: 1

      So basically people just want to show off...

      (Score:-1, Tragic Lack of Fashion Sense)

      Some of us enjoy life.

      xox,
      Dead Nancy

    60. Re:Mugging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
      back when i was in high school, I bought a stun gun. Thought it'd be funny to go around shocking people. It was funny, until my buddy stunned me. I was out of it for 5-10 minutes. Not "fuck that hurts roll around on the ground" like if you get kicked in the nuts. Not "fuck I can't see/breath" like when you get hit with pepper spray. It was pass out and fall to the ground wake up 10 minutes later feeling like shit (all your muscles sore) and minor burns where you were stunned. It was another 10-15 minutes before I regained my balance.

      So tell me where to find you and we'll see if it tingles.

    61. Re:Mugging by comedian23 · · Score: 1

      I actually have a 12-gauge pump Mossberg at home, as well as a protective 50lb dog. The reason I took it off the list was to get some general advise for everyone concerned about home safety. Many people are either scared of guns, have young children or not physically strong enough to shoot a 12-gauge( like my SO ). Also I'd kind of like a "backup" in case I can't make it to my boomstick in time. :-)

    62. Re:Mugging by comedian23 · · Score: 1

      The Shorty looks like it would rip your arm off if you tried to shoot it one handed. I hope that is another grip below the magazine in the front.

    63. Re:Mugging by hondo77 · · Score: 1
      Why would you buy "a nice pair of Sennheiser earbuds" to go with a MiniDisc player? Is it one of those things I'm too old to understand, like tricking out a Honda Civic?

      I must be getting tired...

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    64. Re:Mugging by Creedo · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Seeing as this is a thread on mugging, I think that my electric fence story is on topic.
      When I was around 6, my uncles decided that it would be fun to give me a metal hook(like the kind used on tow chains), and tell me to go and put it on the little wire running around the field in the back. I did. Note: the hook prevents you from losing contact with the fence. The cramping muscles keep you from letting go of the hook. Nuff said.

      --
      All that is necessary for the triumph of good is that evil men do nothing.
    65. Re:Mugging by General+Sherman · · Score: 1

      I hate to burst your bubble, but iPod's have _always_ come with white headphones I have a first gen 5GB iPod bought only a month after they came out, and it came with white headphones.

      --
      - Sherman
    66. Re:Mugging by anethema · · Score: 1

      Haha what a great idea..

      It wouldnt even be hard to do.

      PS. make sure to wear gloves! The explosion frequently doesnt destroy all prints :)

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    67. Re:Mugging by phoneyman · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Anonymous nothing, my name is right there.

      I'm not saying Tasers don't work, I'm saying that they work only in the right context - self-defence by an individual is not that context.

      Getting a Taser to work properly requires that both probes get a good seat in the subject. A common problem is that only one gets in, or that both get in, but one falls out. In the article you sent me the Officer is clearly dressed only in a light, tight, shirt to ensure a good contact by the Taser probes. That's fine for a demo, but that's not how things go on the street. Now imagine him in loose clothing, layered, telling you to give him the fucking iPod right fucking now and tell me you're willing to bet your life on something as fragile as a Taser.

      Here's a thread that illustrates what I'm talking about.

      I'm completely willing to give this a shot. If I could convince the PD here to do it, I'd go get it done in a heartbeat. Barring that, if you want to shoot me with a Taser, let me know. Like I said in a previous post, I can get to Washington State pretty easy - maybe down to Oregon, or over to Idaho.

      I used to think a lot of things were true that weren't. Popular media likes to hype crap like Stun Guns, but the reality is far different.

      Pierre

    68. Re:Mugging by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      As Chris Rock said: "Oh, it's the media. When I'm at the ATM machine, I'm not looking over my shoulder for the media."

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    69. Re:Mugging by phoenix321 · · Score: 1

      You might be interesting in this rather biased site about armed self-defense. Click!

    70. Re:Mugging by PapayaSF · · Score: 1

      I think everyone should wear white headphones in solidarity, whether or not they have an iPod (or any music device). Like the Danes all wearing yellow stars under the Nazis: "You can't get us all, you bastards!"

      --
      Q: What does the "B." in Benoit B. Mandelbrot stand for? A: Benoit B. Mandelbrot
    71. Re:Mugging by shepd · · Score: 2, Informative

      5) Watch Mythbusters

      (FYI: The rail test proved very negative... And their setup more closely resembled an electric fence than anything). :-)

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    72. Re:Mugging by Ion+Berkley · · Score: 1

      Please do ......I would love to hear what any stray charge from it does to your Ipod electronics who's ESD protection circuitry would be utterly overwhelmed by this kind of voltage

    73. Re:Mugging by phoneyman · · Score: 1

      Vancouver, Canada. phoneyman telus net Shoot me an email and we'll talk. Pierre

    74. Re:Mugging by ThaReetLad · · Score: 2, Informative

      almost right. You have a right to use reasonable force to defend yourself or others from harm. You do not have a right to use force to defend your property. You can attempt a citizens arrest and THEN use appropriate levels of force if they violently resist you, but if you kill someone who had broken into your house but was not threatening you then you might well face arrest.

      The alternative, that intruders leave their rights at the door, is essentially that if someone breaks in, you have the right to torture them to death.

      --
      You can't win Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    75. Re:Mugging by Rakthar · · Score: 1

      Yeah I'm sure the police chief describing the actual robberies is part of that guerrilla campaign, right?

    76. Re:Mugging by Samhaine · · Score: 1

      Nitpick time The linked Sony headphones are also in-ear. I don't think there are any in-ear headphones that match the iPod, other than that Sony model and the official ones.

    77. Re:Mugging by romper · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you buy it on apple.com you get free engraving. I think I'll engrave mine "STOLEN".

      --
      Right is wrong when left is right.
    78. Re:Mugging by Fwongo · · Score: 1

      The real answer is: depends on the voltage. Lower-end tasers only cause pain, and higher end ones do paralyze, do varying degrees. This is usually advertised.

    79. Re:Mugging by steeef · · Score: 1

      I hate to burst your bubble, but what he meant was that before Apple offered replacement earbuds, people who lost the originals bought white sony earbuds instead.

    80. Re:Mugging by Skater · · Score: 1

      Careful there - I just bought a camera cell phone last weekend. As little as a month ago, I was saying that I can't see why anyone would want one.

      I figured it out: My phone will cost $80 after rebates (rebate is $70), and it has a camera - LG VX6000. I paid $80 for a lot less phone two years ago (Kyocera 2235).

      For an extra $5/month, I can transfer up to 80 pictures each month until December of 2005, then it drops to 40 pictures a month.

      With those kinds of prices, why not get the camera phone?

      --RJ

    81. Re:Mugging by Bryan_W · · Score: 1

      How the hell did you come to find this out?

    82. Re:Mugging by ePhil_One · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Its hard to imagine, because Police Chiefs are never fooled

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
    83. Re:Mugging by Jabber3776 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Mythbusters may have proved this wrong with the rail test. BUT I have personally heard the aftermath of someone not heading my advice to watch out for the fence. See I grew up on a dairy farm. We had this pipe that would always get clogged so you would have to snake it and it was in the middle of a holding area for some of our cattle, namely the bull. So this pipe was cut open in the field to unclog we needed and we put an electric fence around it to keep the bull out. The bull thought it entertaining to tear the fence down sometimes and you would find the fence down. We had a male work hand that had issues with working with me and that a kid in high school didn't know what the hell they were talking about. SO being a man, and doing and men do as needed he proceeds out to take a whiz. I try to warn him that fence was down to no avail. The next thing I know I hear help quite a few octaves higher than normal. He comes stomping back in the area I was working and starting to chew me out for not warning him... I told him next time he'd listen to me when I had something say....

    84. Re:Mugging by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1

      White headphones are like a status symbol now.

      Only to shallow people who judge status by possesion of overpriced MP3 players.

    85. Re:Mugging by timmerk15 · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, no they don't. As a law enforcement officer, at least in our city, we have to get tazed to know what it feels like. The 3 times I have been tazed by one, was by a 500,000 volt one, and I didn't fall or become paralyzed. It would still be easy to attack after.

      --
      Free stuff without getting the referrals? http://referralaccelerated.com
    86. Re:Mugging by TygerFish · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, the warning in the article sounds like common sense. We live in a culture of capital--of possessions and class with who owns what determined by disposable income.

      Apple certainly understands this which is why they introduce iPod models by threes, differentiated only by the size of the harddrive. It lets you say, 'look! I spent more money. Mine is bigger!'

      Like it or not, the iPod is a device which announces that its owner has spent at least U.S. $300 on something easily stolen and eminently desireable. If you want to understand what that white cord looks like to a thief, imagine going to a bank and getting three fat stacks of singles, and then taping them to your chest with a post-it attached that says, 'Hi, you don't have this!'

      It just makes sense.

      --
      To mail me, remove the 'mailno' from my email addy.
      "Yeah. It smells, too..."
    87. Re:Mugging by dekashizl · · Score: 1
      if you kill someone who had broken into your house but was not threatening you then you might well face arrest.
      Considering that most houses don't have 24/7 audio/video surveillance, I think it's safe to say that if you killed somebody who had broken into your house, you'd be smart to talk to a lawyer and then come up with a pretty good story for how the whole thing happened. And I'd rather face arrest than jail, death, or even significant risk of either.
    88. Re:Mugging by BattyMan · · Score: 1

      Too bad my state won't let me carry the shorty :(
      What's the best defensive weapon to use when you can't carry a gun?


      The consensus is that the best defensive weapon is _still_ a gun,
      but preference of type changes to small, easily-concealable models.
      "I'd rather be tried by twelve than carried by six", etc.

      --
      Exceeding the recommended torque is not recommended.
    89. Re:Mugging by lonesome+phreak · · Score: 1

      Airsoft...400 fps 8mm metal bb's, on full auto.

      --
      Maybe we DID take the blue pill. You wouldn't remember anyway.
    90. Re:Mugging by phoneyman · · Score: 1

      The alternative, that intruders leave their rights at the door, is essentially that if someone breaks in, you have the right to torture them to death. First of all if someone breaks in, and I'm home, for my own safety I'm going to assume that they mean me grievious bodily harm; to do otherwise would be imprudent.

      Second, I really don't see a downside to burglars facing the very real possibility of death for doing nothing more than breaking in while a homeowner is home.

      Pierre

    91. Re:Mugging by shadowbearer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Parent does make a good point. If one is wearing really thick clothing (like, say, a insulated winter jacket) it's likely that the taser probes won't make good contact. A decent leather jacket may even be enough. Leather is pretty tough.

      That said, I've always wondered if a good defense against a taser might not be a conducting layer (worn beneath light upper layer clothing) that is hardy enough to stop and seat the probes, and which is connected to a metal plate at the bottom of one's shoes, thereby grounding the charge. I would think you'd get tingled, but it wouldn't be debilitating.

      I've never read about such a thing (and I'm obviously not willing to conduct the experiment :) - I've had a few 110 shocks and one much higher, argh) but does anyone here know enough to tell me whether it would work? I'm fairly cognizant with electricity but not enough in the high voltage realms tasers work in.

      In a self-defense situation, myself, I'd prefer something that can stop them more permanently if necessary - but I'm old-fashioned :)

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    92. Re:Mugging by Durandal64 · · Score: 1

      Nothing will get a burglar out of your home faster than the "Cha-Chuck!" of a 12 gauge.

    93. Re:Mugging by mpoulton · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that they work mainly with pain compliance

      You are decidely incorrect. Stun guns used to work that way, but newer ones definitely do not. They work by triggering widespread uncontrollable muscle rigidity. See the excellent examples(both demos and surveillance/news video) at: cool taser video page

      --
      I am a geek attorney, but not your geek attorney unless you've already retained me. This is not legal advice.
    94. Re:Mugging by bellings · · Score: 2, Informative

      You remember it wrong. That's not suprising. You were six.

      Electric fences on farms cycle -- off, briefly on, off, briefly on, etc. You put the hook on, the fence went on, you were shocked, the fence went off, you let go.

      --
      Slashdot is jumping the shark. I'm just driving the boat.
    95. Re:Mugging by criordan · · Score: 1

      That means a realistic looking handgun in a neighborhood full of the type of people who would mug someone over an iPod. Not something that I would be willing to try, but don't let me stop you.

      --
      http://www.aaplblog.com/ - News about Apple Inc.
    96. Re:Mugging by g-doo · · Score: 1

      People don't want to show off.

      A lot of people instead like that white earbuds MATCH the color of the white iPod. They also look stylish. It's a style issue.

    97. Re:Mugging by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      White earphones don't mug people; people who want white earphones mug people.

    98. Re:Mugging by facelessnumber · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nah, stun guns don't paralyze... I used one once. I've never seen my little brother get outta bed so fast in my life.

    99. Re:Mugging by jesser · · Score: 1

      A more correct statement: "There are guys who'd rather accept the increased probability of being robbed than purchase new headphones".

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
    100. Re:Mugging by phoneyman · · Score: 1

      Stun guns used to work that way, but newer ones definitely do not.

      They all say that, but very few actually prove it. The Taser might do this, if everything goes right for the user, but it might not.

      Sending me to the Taser site for "proof" isn't exactly convincing, either.

      Pierre

    101. Re:Mugging by ForestGrump · · Score: 1

      your penis may be blown off in the process.

      FEAR NOT!

      A year to Russia can cure the problem.

      linky news article
      -Grump

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    102. Re:Mugging by Qacker · · Score: 1
      You are now on my friend list! ahumanright is a great site. Check out thehighroad.org its a gun forum made by the same guy that runs ahumanright.org

      Gun Rights!

      --
      Learn lisp today!
    103. Re:Mugging by darkpixel2k · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I volunteer to stun you and I live in Washington!

      I really doubt you could 'power on through' the stun effect. But if that fails, Succinylcholine always works. Always.

      --
      There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
    104. Re:Mugging by base3 · · Score: 1

      Summed up nicely right here.

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
    105. Re:Mugging by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      Most celebrities seem to fall under the "criminal" heading...

    106. Re:Mugging by dandelion_wine · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I recommend the book Dead Men Do Tell Tales -- forensic pathologists tracking down apparent suicides, in many cases.

      There is a case -- from Toronto -- of a man doing just what was described as impossible by Mythbusters. Did they control for saline content? It was determined that the high saline content of this man (must have been dehydrated) allowed the arc. It had previously been thought a suicide.

      (and just for fun, in the telling that is, another man tied a dagger to his radiator point-up and stabbed himself 7 times in the head -- in this case, ruled a homicide because they figured no one could possibly manage this feat -- wrong again)

      DW

    107. Re:Mugging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nerd 1: Oh, don't worry, Mr. Simpson, we can take care of ourselves.
      Snake: Uh, wallet inspector!
      Nerd 2: Oh, here you go. I believe that's all in order.

    108. Re:Mugging by dandelion_wine · · Score: 1
      Hey, next time I catch a dark-suited sarariman tattooed with the Mitsubishi-Genentech logo, I'm rollin him.

      If it's real, he's in for trouble; if it's not, serves him right.

      /too obscure?

    109. Re:Mugging by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Did they control for saline content? It was determined that the high saline content of this man (must have been dehydrated) allowed the arc.

      Yes and no. As far as the saline content goes, they used their own urine for the test. The test dummy was made from ballistics gel, and they designed a release system which would trip if more than a few milliamps of current passed through the dummy.

      They weren't exactly the most controlled experiments, but they had to go to great and unlikely lengths to get the release system to trip. It worked when they drenched the dummy with salt water, IIRC. Sooo, it certainly could be possible in abnormal conditions. :)

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    110. Re:Mugging by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      What was the guy supposed to do, wait until they shot him? If someone comes to your door holding a gun and demanding money, that's a pretty good indication that they intend to harm you. Are you really required to hand over whatever they want and then just hope that they leave without harming you?

    111. Re:Mugging by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 5, Funny
      2) Walk up to the electric fence.
      Some 30 years ago, I spent the summer on a farm. Trying to get the best of the city boy, the redneck told me to have a grab at the electric fence. I walked to the fence, and made it look I had a really good grip on the wire by wrapping my hand around it, but not touching the wire itself.

      I stood there, taking my best innocent air, and staring at him like saying "now what"???

      He was puzzled, got off the tractor, and walked straight to the fence which he touched pretty intently.

      At that very moment, the relay decided to send a good charge which sent the redneck something like 3 feet up in the air, landing on his ass in the freshly ploughed field.

      He said nothing at all, and never played smartass again with me...

    112. Re:Mugging by Kaboom13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Commercial farm fences may cycle, but I've seen some highly jury-rigged electric fences in my brief experiences in the boondocks. It's possible the poster is correct and the designers of said electrical fence were not wise enough to include said cycling feature.

    113. Re:Mugging by paulymer5 · · Score: 1

      White headphones are like a status symbol now. I'm not sure if it's sad or funny.

      I was going to buy a pair of white headphones for my Sony player, but now I'm reconsidering. Yes, I simply wanted white headphones.

    114. Re:Mugging by frission · · Score: 1

      i think you might be able to claim it under home owner's insurance...as well as a loss on your taxes :) depending on what kind of insurance you have, and if the prices have come down any (don't know, i still have a 5 gig), but you might be able to get an upgrade :)

    115. Re:Mugging by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      Don't whiz on the electric fence!

    116. Re:Mugging by Archie+Steel · · Score: 1

      Why should we care? Are you a mugger?

      Seriously, I think it's quite obvious that a taser isn't a superweapon. That's not the point. The idea is that, if used right, it can provide an edge in a physical confrontation. The thing is to try to use the element of surprise provided by the sudden pain to use other self-defense maneuvers, possibly a disarming arm lock, or a strike to the throat, neck, groin, etc. - or even try to get away if possible. You're not supposed to waive it around menacingly! Like any weapon, they are only what you make of them - trust too much in their power and you may regret it.

      Of course they're pretty useless against guns - I mean, you could try to use it if your life was threatened, but for a common mugging it's not worth the risk.

      So, anyway, for your challenge to be fair, you'd have to accept to be caught unaware... ;-)

      --

      Reminder: find a new sig
    117. Re:Mugging by phoneyman · · Score: 1

      Why should we care? Are you a mugger?

      No, I'm not a mugger. I just don't like fostering beliefs that aren't true, and fighting is a passion of mine.

      The thing is to try to use the element of surprise provided by the sudden pain to use other self-defense maneuvers

      Excellent advice, but why waste time with a Taser to do it?

      Tasers are the same size and general shape as a Glock 9mm, so similar in fact that Officers have shot suspects with their duty weapons thinking they were handling a Taser M26. Thus concealability is an issue, as is accessibility.

      Furthermore there is the fact that many courts will nevertheless consider a Taser a potentially lethal weapon in its use by civilians, and thus require the same consideration to use as if you were using a gun. Therefore, if it's legal to do so, it's smarter to just carry a gun.

      Lastly, your life is at risk in a common mugging. If the criminal says "Give me your fucking iPod" and you say "No", he's not going to just say "Right then" and bugger off.

      Pierre

    118. Re:Mugging by zaffir · · Score: 1

      There is a video floating around on the internet showing stun guns used on people - it's a purely volunteer exercise, not some faces of death thing. The cheapies based on 30 year old tech were useless and could be overcome easily. But most of them made it pretty impossible for the "attacker" to do anything - and the modern ones completely paralyzed them, they were incapable of doing anything at all.

      --
      "Upon attaching the waterblock to my penis, I began to notice that I know nothing about computers." -- JRockway
    119. Re:Mugging by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

      Umm... from where do you get the impression that tazers aren't supposed to be used to intimidate?

      The two prongs on the front are all that is really needed, but most tazers are equipped with a second set of prongs which point towards each other. The only point of those prongs are to generate an arc so that you can scare people off.

    120. Re:Mugging by tftp · · Score: 1
      I don't believe that 500,000 volt thing. They can have such a voltage; however the current will be miniscule, like microamperes. The visual effect may be entertaining, but that happens only over the air, which is dielectric. As soon as the arc enters the body, the resistance of the body is millions times less, and the voltage drops on this segment of the circuit - but the current is still the same; and so the power that the tazee gets is quite low.

      Regardless of electrotechnics, it's the power that stuns, disables or kills. And what power we are talking about here? Just a battery or two? Forget it. Try tazer, and you will lose it along with the iPod, and probably the mugger will be mad as hell too.

    121. Re:Mugging by plumpy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Fuck that, if you're in Portland, OR, even if it IS a cop, it might still be a good idea to taze the fuck out of him. Better than ending up dead, right?

    122. Re:Mugging by rhuntley12 · · Score: 1

      Well when your the one carrying the .45 it could be interesting. Still never been mugged though.

    123. Re:Mugging by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      if you check out Information unlimited, especially THE SIZZLER at 20 foot range
      they have a device which is more like a traditional stun gun than a taser but emits an arc outwards... seems like a more formidable weapon against a mugger and less likely to be foiled by a heavy vest

      NOTE: their site seems to be full of fake stuff but that is not so.... I have purchased from them before (got a Laser pointer from them 9 years ago when laser pointers were not common like they are today, and it came with a pamphlet with alot of the same stuff they advertise now so it is the same company as back then)

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    124. Re:mugging by sammy_55 · · Score: 1

      I should notify the police. Can you send me your address?

    125. Re:Mugging by Archie+Steel · · Score: 1

      Excellent advice, but why waste time with a Taser to do it?

      I wouldn't, but I can understand how it can effectively help self-defence if used well. I'm guessing that, as a martial arts practitioner, you would probably choose another type of weapon. But tasers (combined with basic self-defence training, of course) can be of help to others who might be less fit or strong than you are.

      That said, I'm not necessarily advocating their use, just that they can indeed be useful in some situations, like mace or pepper spray. (Heck, if they weren't that fragile, eggshell flashbombs could be quite effective: "my wallet? sure...Flash! Whap, whap, kick, thud)

      Therefore, if it's legal to do so, it's smarter to just carry a gun.

      The key concept here is non-lethal (though I guess the pacemaker-wearing muggers are at risk...). It's certainly more effective using a gun (if you can - in most of the civilized world, you can't), but the risk of causing death is greater. And that's bad for your soul - or bad karma if you're more of a buddhist, like me...

      --

      Reminder: find a new sig
    126. Re:Mugging by madgamer · · Score: 1

      At the gym that I go to, I use my first gen iPod to listen to music while I run. One time, this guy with white earbuds saw my iPod and gave me the knowing "hey there fellow iPod user" nod and started running on the machine next to mine. 20 minutes later, I saw him changing songs and saw that he had a cheapo flash-based player. I didn't mind, because I don't really care what he had, but it struck me as funny that he was pretending to be an iPod user.

    127. Re:Mugging by Archie+Steel · · Score: 1

      Well, intimidation is a gamble. What the mugger calls your bluff? Most won't, but there is a risk that he will? What if you miss, or the pain isn't enough for you to get the upper hand?

      I guess that, as in most mugging cases, it depends a lot of the situation. If you can feel that the mugger might be intimidated, then you can take the chance, personally I'd rather try to use it defensively.

      The best weapon is always a sharp mind and a wise soul - though this tells me that Apple should think about marketing an iPod with integrated taser... :-) I can see the slogan: "10 hours of play or two 10,000 volt shocks!"

      --

      Reminder: find a new sig
    128. Re:Mugging by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      You have a right to use reasonable force to defend yourself or others from harm. You do not have a right to use force to defend your property.

      Well, that depends on your locality. Here in Florida, the law states:

      "the person is justified in the use of deadly force only if he or she reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony ." (Fl. Statutes 776.012), emphasis mine

      "Forcible felony" is defined as:

      "treason; murder; manslaughter; sexual battery; carjacking; home-invasion robbery; robbery; burglary; arson; kidnapping; aggravated assault; aggravated battery; aggravated stalking; aircraft piracy; unlawful throwing, placing, or discharging of a destructive device or bomb; and any other felony which involves the use or threat of physical force or violence against any individual." (Fl. Statutes 776.08)

      I'm not a lawyer, and this isn't legal advice by any means, but I'm quite sure that mugging falls under the category of "robbery" and/or "aggravated assault", and as such would likely be met with unpleasant consequences should it happen to me. Different states will obviously have different laws, but Florida at least is not particularly mugger-friendly, especially in light of the fact that it is has a "shall-issue" policy regarding concealed carry permits.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    129. Re:Mugging by afidel · · Score: 1

      A large, loud dog. Seriously. Every interview with burglers I've ever seen says that they look for an empty house without alarms first, then ones with alarms, then occupied houses at night, and only if they are desperate for drug money do they mess with houses with dogs.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    130. Re:Mugging by BitHive · · Score: 1

      And anecdotal evidence is the best kind of evidence... I'd be willing to bet that if you weren't expecting to get stunned, you'd be startled and disoriented enough (was it a knife? what the fuck just happened?) that you'd hardly have the presence of mind to "clinch" anyone, let alone "continue an assault". Maybe if you're already in an adrenaline-fed kill-and-destroy mode, but certainly not over an iPod. Also, disrupting voluntary muscle control enough for brief paralysis isn't going to stop anyone's heart. For one thing, the heart is controlled by a completely different cranial nerve, and although the metaphor works sometimes, nerves aren't wires, and the charge won't feed back and short out everything.

    131. Re:Mugging by afidel · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but if someone who is not invited is in my house while I am sleeping then my immediate conclusion is that they intend me harm. I will take my chances with a jury should the cops and prosecuter be insane enough to bring charges should I never need to defend my house and family. That said, the only time I have needed to draw a weapon was when a punk from high school and a few of his friends stopped by after he got suspended for starting a fight with me. I grabbed the 12 gauge and told him to leave my property immedietly, he complied quite quickly =)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    132. Re:Mugging by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      Just hit them with the damn discman

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    133. Re:Mugging by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      Nope, but the robberies are part of the campaign, plus it keeps production costs down.

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    134. Re:Mugging by thetaikung · · Score: 1

      I really hope somebody takes this guy up on his offer...

      --
      P226 .40cal
    135. Re:Mugging by markimusk · · Score: 1

      So you're saying that rectal exams without sandpaper gloves are fun then? I think I'll go play a video game.

    136. Re:Mugging by cscx · · Score: 1

      Because they are cheap and sound better. The Apple earbuds are overpriced shit, even the replacement ones. You can get two pairs of decent ones for the price of one Apple set, just because they're painted white.

    137. Re:Mugging by Insipid+Trunculance · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In all seriousness, I'd love a chance to really try out a tazer, even if it involved getting mugged. Really. "Give me your--" *bzzt* *thud* "AWESOME!"

      Except a mugging usually involves a gang of atleast 3 people who surround you and put a knife across your throat before you know what's happened.

      --
      Wanted : A Signature.
    138. Re:Mugging by op00to · · Score: 1

      Genius idea. Whip out a real-looking assault rifle. You better hope that you're the only person armed in the area.

    139. Re:Mugging by teslafreak · · Score: 1

      Well, be careful using it as primary defense, there is a guy out here who does self defense classes that uses the strongest stun gun he could find on himself every class to show how worthless they are. He did mention that a tazer is different from a stun gun though, and he says tazers are pretty good. I mention because some people think they are the same thing.

    140. Re:Mugging by teslafreak · · Score: 1

      Which means that the second you pull that stun gun away, they are fine again, in pain (I have been zapped, it DOES hurt) but otherwise, they are now pissed, and ready to attack you again.

    141. Re:Mugging by teslafreak · · Score: 1

      Very true, it hurts, but if you don't keep constant voltage on them, they get up and are ok, and you can't run and keep constant voltage on them

    142. Re:Mugging by lemody · · Score: 1

      and even better would be tazers in the ipod headphones, you could just turn them on when offering ipod to robber :)

      --


      class he-man extends man!
    143. Re:Mugging by teslafreak · · Score: 1

      That is an AWESOME idea!!!!! Now I feel like buying an ipod shell of the internet, and mixing up some arsonists playdough

    144. Re:Mugging by weg · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, get an old ipod, take it apart and place the taser in the ipod casing, and connect the probes to the ear-phones... now wait until you get mugged, give the mugger the modified ipod an then RUN!

      --
      Georg
    145. Re:Mugging by Kingpin · · Score: 1

      Interesting story.. Sure that you're not the redneck who got visited by a city boy, "Pig Hogger"? :-)

      --
      Unable to read configuration file '/bigassraid/htdig//conf/14229.conf'
      Geocrawler error message.
    146. Re:Mugging by ttroutma · · Score: 1

      Read the article. These muggings are happening in England where you can't have a taser, gun or OC/pepper spray. Which some would say is why the muggings would be a problem in the first place. The first time the news talked up a dead iPod mugger, that'd be the end of it.

    147. Re:Mugging by Quebst · · Score: 1

      Your name is Pig Hogger and you call someone else a redneck? Unless of course you too are a redneck, in which case I think rednecks won't mind. I've suffered an actual "red neck" every summer growing up, but I don't own a truck and my speech is goodly, dag namit.

      If anyone insists on playing with an electric fence, use a damp stick to touch the wire with. It will send a mild shock. I used to do that as a kid for fun, which gives away how bored I was. I've been stunned by a stun gun, once was hit with a cattle prod, and have accidently and purposely touched an electric fence and would have to say the prod was the worst. Real smart of me huh? I hope it didn't do any permement damage. I also hope I don't have any damage from the incidents. Cows are pretty.... and somehow this all relates to ipods.

    148. Re:Mugging by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1

      Why does this remind me of the german cannibal and the guy who wanted to be eaten? I'd come around and stun you just for your foolish hubris but I'm in another country now. Can someone please go zap this fool with a Tazer and post the pictures of him curled up in pain here.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    149. Re:Mugging by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1
      Perhaps a repeat of the experiment with an increased amperage might sort you out? Seriously though, I always thought the point of these things was to short out the victims nervous system preventing them from controlling their muscles and hopefully causing unconciousness.

      As a side note, I have been eletrocuted with mains power twice in my life now and can guarantee you that you won't be defending yourself from an attacker while you're copping a dose of mains current. Perhaps they just need to dial up the amperage on these guns?

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    150. Re:Mugging by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 1
      thats my backup plan.

      I mean the thing literally wieghs 4lbs runs on 4 AA bateries for a whopping 2hrs of play time.

      --

      My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    151. Re:Mugging by instarx · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you could close on the person with the stun gun, but you would be fore-warned, motivated, prepared, and aware that it would cause no long-term damage to your body. These are not things a surprised mugger would have or know.

      Of the commonly available "stun" weapons, the Tazer is indeed the best, but they aren't reliable stoppers.

      It is true that for many years Tasers had stopping problems with highly motivated attackers, but the latest generation Tasers are *much* more effective. Perhaps your anecdotal evidence comes from the earlier models. For years Tasers were not popular with police departments because of this, but the recent Taser models are being purchased by police and military as fast Taser can make them. I think you might not be able to overcome a newer Taser no matter how motivated you were, but this is just a guess - I have no access to test results.

      really disabling the nervous system is also capable of stopping the heart and killing the attacker

      That is why this class of weapons is now called "less lethal" rather than "non-lethal".

    152. Re:Mugging by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      The Sun?

      Since when did anyone use The Sun as a reliable news source?

      Next story - girl with big tits uses the iPod.

    153. Re:Mugging by Jennifer+E.+Elaan · · Score: 1
      In general, a conducting layer like that would be an excellent defence, shunting the current quickly between the two probes. There is no need for a path to earth ground involved at all. While this is high voltage, it is essentially DC, so there is no need for earthing and/or RF grounding.

      The best would be if there was an insulating layer under the foil, but it's not even strictly necessary. Electricity follows the path of least resistance.

    154. Re:Mugging by Jennifer+E.+Elaan · · Score: 1
      Actually, I keep a lot of high concentration HCl on hand, and let me tell you... as a defensive weapon, it's *useless*. HCl is probably the safest of the strong acids.

      I knew someone who kept constantly spilling the stuff on herself (accident prone). It didn't do very much of anything, caused a small rash. It got to the point where she stopped wearing gloves when dealing with the stuff, because it was so harmless (this is, of course, not reccomended).

      Now, if you want nastiness, go with H2SO4 (which will catalytically remove the water from organic tissue) or HF (which will go right through the skin and remove the bones from under it).

    155. Re:Mugging by -Harlequin- · · Score: 1

      Why do you think he was pretending? Some people (like me) don't like using their HDD-player while jogging, and prefer to grab a flash player for that activity - it's smaller, lighter, more able to survive impact/drops, cheaper (in case #2 fails), and solid state.

    156. Re:Mugging by -Harlequin- · · Score: 1

      A lot of people instead like that white earbuds MATCH the color of the white iPod. They also look stylish. It's a style issue.

      Or, lack of style issue :)
      If it were about style, people would chose different earbuds that match their outfit, or compliment their features, not something that is identical out of the box, and distinctive primarily as product branding - that's fad/fashion, not style.

      And even having the buds match the player is nice only if the player is actually visible - which defeats the point of all the feature sacrifices that were made to acheive it's great size and pocketablity. But then... if the point is not to be stylish, but instead to be _seen_ with the ipod, then the ipod isn't going to be left in a pocket, but held openly in one hand (as is commonly seen from a lot of users).

      So I think most people you _see_ with an ipod, are either unconcerned about style, or lacking it. Whereas those ipod users who I _don't_ see, (because they use buds that compliment _their_ style, rather than default ones, with their gadgets not on display, not distracting from the form, those users probably are very stylish :)

      Unfortunately, precisely because those ipod users are stylish, they're not useful as product posterboys (and postergirls).

      These are the people that fascinate me however. (little tangent) Whenever someone walks into a room, and WHAM, they seem totally hot, or totally with it, and yet on reflection, you can't easily articulate why - I now have a radar for that, because generally it means interesting shit is flying under the radar, speaking directly to your perception at a level you're not easily aware of, despite it being far more powerful stuff than stuff you are aware of, like someone wearing the latest brand-names. Screw brand-names, they're snake-oil - especially since the Real Deal is out there.

    157. Re:Mugging by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      Okay, maybe you should give them the discman? That's punishment enough

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    158. Re:Mugging by kaybi · · Score: 1

      If they dont taze the fsck out of you first!
      *ow*

    159. Re:Mugging by mrogers · · Score: 1
      I'd personally be more than willing to get "stunned" by any available electrical "paralysis" garbage on the market, and I'd be willing to bet that I could close in on the stunner and clinch them while they stun me.

      I advise you to get someone to look over the "Hobbies and Interests" section of your resume before you apply for any more jobs. ;-)

    160. Re:Mugging by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      BTW, that wasn't me in that other post. As from speaking from experience, no comment ;)

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    161. Re:Mugging by tbone1 · · Score: 1
      I refuse to read any more in a thread when slashdot posters start discussing fashion. It's like hearing Bill Clinton talk about the dangers of marital infidelity.

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
    162. Re:Mugging by kaybi · · Score: 1

      hmm,
      1) Stray charge through 1/4 of abs plastic?
      2) Does Motorola radios have some special protection from these charges?

    163. Re:Mugging by GT_Alias · · Score: 1
      This, I posit, will remove *all* further desire on your part to play with high voltage electricity.

      Furthermore, it will contribute to the chlorination of the gene pool.

    164. Re:Mugging by RedShoeRider · · Score: 1

      What if I don't have a dick, you insensitive clod!

      --

      Chris Knight is my hero.

    165. Re:Mugging by jridley · · Score: 1

      That said, I've always wondered if a good defense against a taser might not be a conducting layer (worn beneath light upper layer clothing) that is hardy enough to stop and seat the probes, and which is connected to a metal plate at the bottom of one's shoes, thereby grounding the charge. I would think you'd get tingled, but it wouldn't be debilitating.

      You don't need to be grounded. Unless the tazer has a grounding strap, then the ground is not completing the circuit. Think about it; if the ground were involved with this at all, it'd be going through the person RUNNING the tazer, and would shock him as well.

      This is different than getting shocked with mains voltage, which is referenced to ground and ground can provide a return path. This is why you can get a shock from the mains when you only touch one wire. If you were totally insulated, you could touch that one wire without problem.

      The circuit for a tazer runs strictly between the two probes.

    166. Re:Mugging by What'sInAName · · Score: 1

      Too true. In fact, when I was in India last year, there was an ad for some cell phone that I don't remember (effective ad). The premise is that this hot looking woman walks in the bar asking for the "guy with the smallest one." All the other guys back off, kind of awkwardly, until this one stud comes up, and he pulls out his cell phone and you see that's what they're talking about.

    167. Re:Mugging by _UnderTow_ · · Score: 1

      Those who would ditch their white headphones for a little temporary security deserve neither security or white headphones.

    168. Re:Mugging by f0rt0r · · Score: 1

      Well, you could always go for the face then. A friend of mine took down a 6'5" mugger with his tazer and swears by them for self defense now. He did warn they can interfere with pacemakers, which means it will not always have the intended effect, and could get you into a lawsuit by the victims relatives.

      --
      I can't afford a sig!
    169. Re:Mugging by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Actually I have been mugged, walking with my Karate Teacher one night... a very small old Korean man looks like you could break him in 1/2 by blowing on him.

      before the piles of crap knew what happened he broke one guy's arm and ribs and the other guy was looking at his leg bone sticking out of his thigh.

      basically the 2 guys were lucky they only had knives, as he said to the one with his broken arm still twisted to bring him to the ground, "you both would be dead now if you had a gun."

      Learn Karate or another martial art and understand it. a Brown Belt can protect him/her self well against an armed attacker. if you can flee or end without conflict then do it, otherwise intend and attempt to disable that person that is very willing to severely hurt or kill you.

      Otherwise stay away from places that have a higher chance of muggings or only travel in large groups and take measures to avoid being mugged.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    170. Re:Mugging by Chewie · · Score: 1

      You don't always even need that. My aunt was home alone one night while my uncle was out of town. She woke up and heard someone moving around in the house, and shouted, "Ray, get the gun!"

      She heard a pounding of feet out the door shortly after that.

      --
      49 20 68 61 76 65 20 74 6F 6F 20 6D 75 63 68 20 66 72 65 65 20 74 69 6D 65 2E
    171. Re:Mugging by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

      (Actually, "pig hogger" is a railroad reference. Has nothing to do with pigs per se).

    172. Re:Mugging by Shakrai · · Score: 1
      I actually have a 12-gauge pump Mossberg at home, as well as a protective 50lb dog. The reason I took it off the list was to get some general advise for everyone concerned about home safety. Many people are either scared of guns, have young children or not physically strong enough to shoot a 12-gauge( like my SO ). Also I'd kind of like a "backup" in case I can't make it to my boomstick in time. :-)

      The dog is the best form of home security actually. They either won't screw with you because they aren't sure how big/mean it is, or if they do decide to screw with you the dog will bark and you'll be alerted and have time to take defensive measures (call the cops & get your 12 gage out). The warning is probably the best thing because no matter how big/mean your dog is (and who wants a mean one if they have kids?) it can be stopped with a can of mace.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    173. Re:Mugging by Tut'n'common · · Score: 1

      Of course, in South Carolina, US, anyway, killing an intruder in your house is just fine. The AG a few years back declared "open season"... heh heh heh

      ref: http://www.packing.org/news/article.jsp/2955

      --


      "I was a geek before it was cool" --Me
    174. Re:Mugging by Matt1313 · · Score: 1

      In all seriousness, I'd love a chance to really try out a tazer, even if it involved getting mugged. Really.

      At least let them get the word "wallet" or "money" out before you Tazer them... would be pretty bad if they were just asking for directions or the time and since you were so excited to get your Tazer onto them you did not let them finish their request.

    175. Re:Mugging by spincycle1953 · · Score: 1

      "I'm not saying Tasers don't work, I'm saying that they work only in the right context - self-defence by an individual is not that context."

      Traveling to the Pacific Northwest for a casual tasing...THAT'S the right context.

      --
      My other machine is a lever.
    176. Re:Mugging by 3vi1 · · Score: 1

      >> Now imagine him in loose clothing, layered, telling you to give him the fucking iPod right fucking now and tell me you're willing to bet your life on something as fragile as a Taser.

      I wonder how much it hurts to be Tased in the face.

    177. Re:Mugging by bludstone · · Score: 1

      Er. No. It would be more like:

      Him: "Give me your wallet!"
      You: *bzzt*
      Him: *BANG BANG BANG BANG BANG BANG*
      You: *bleed*

      --

      no .sig
    178. Re:Mugging by 3vi1 · · Score: 1

      >> Now imagine him in loose clothing, layered, telling you to give him the fucking iPod right fucking now and tell me you're willing to bet your life on something as fragile as a Taser.

      I wonder how much it hurts to get Tased in the face.

    179. Re:Mugging by hambonewilkins · · Score: 1

      Looks like that whoring didn't work! But, good attempt, brains!

      --

      God Bless America. Why? Did it sneeze?
    180. Re:Mugging by alasdair · · Score: 1

      I can provide a supporting anecdote for the cycling. When we were camping with the Boy Scouts in Scotland some of our troop discovered that holding on to the electric fence produced a repetitive shock. Holding someone else's nose with the other hand passed the shock on through their nose...


      In an unrelated incident in Denmark, camping with the Scouts again, I hung my damp towel on an electic fence to dry. Gave me some nasty moments picking it up.


      In both cases the shocks were unpleasant, but not hugely disorienting or stunning.

    181. Re:Mugging by Jahf · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

      Those who fall down during a test generally know that they are in a safe environment so they can give in to manage the pain because they are not at risk.

      Seriously, if you taze someone with a knife (or worse, a gun) that is in position to use it you run a serious risk that it will just cause them to do what they are ready for, which is hurt you, because that is their basest instinct at the time.

      Pain strips away your cognitive ability (just ask someone who is suffering from chronic pain why they are an ass when the pain gets bad), it doesn't paralyze.

      Any electrical current strong enough to truly paralyze is too strong to be approved.

      --
      It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
    182. Re:Mugging by tkw954 · · Score: 1
      I think I'm going to call bullshit. As a born and raised farmboy, I've worked with a good number of electric fences and got a number of shocks. In my experience, when you get a shock it's a surprise but i doesn't hurt. Even if you're standing in wet grass in runners it's not going to lift you off your feet.

      But maybe he'd souped up his energizer to match his Chevy.

    183. Re:Mugging by tabhitter · · Score: 1

      That could be bzzt thud... and the thud is the mudder hitting you with a maglight... I'd test your tazer on a friend first I had a friend that had one and he hit me with it... It stunned me but only for a split second... then my adrenaline took over I know i coulda still beat his a$$.... maybe his batteries were just low....

    184. Re:Mugging by Maestro4k · · Score: 1
      • Getting a Taser to work properly requires that both probes get a good seat in the subject. A common problem is that only one gets in, or that both get in, but one falls out. In the article you sent me the Officer is clearly dressed only in a light, tight, shirt to ensure a good contact by the Taser probes. That's fine for a demo, but that's not how things go on the street. Now imagine him in loose clothing, layered, telling you to give him the fucking iPod right fucking now and tell me you're willing to bet your life on something as fragile as a Taser.
      Lets take this as a given (and I believe it is, too many people have chimed up saying they've been tased and it didn't paralyze them for it not to be IMHO). How about we change the game a bit, since the idea was to basically use an iPod as bait for using a taser on a mugger. Let's make a mock-up empty little white box that looks like an iPod, put a real headphone jack in to plug the headphones into. Fix up the inside with components of a taser, a dye-pack, basically something non-lethal. Fix it so that either you can activate it by remote once the mugger's out of your sight (if they're on foot they'd still be within range), or simply set it up so that it goes off once it's a certain distance from a device on your body. You could also rig it so that turning the iPod on activates whatever is inside.

      Personally I think the dye pack would be the most fun, especially since when they were noticed and captures by police they'd think they had robbed a bank at first. :) This could be a good method for the police to use undercover in areas with high iPod muggings going on. Even the stupidest of crooks are going to think twice if the iPod the steal might suddenly turn into a weapon or explode with dye on them.

    185. Re:Mugging by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      well at least my sig is getting people talking at least.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    186. Re:Mugging by comedian23 · · Score: 1

      >I knew someone who kept constantly spilling the stuff on herself (accident prone).

      LOL, I needed a good chuckle this morning. Thanks for that. Hopefully she is more careful around the other stuff you mention( H2SO4 and HF). :-)

    187. Re:Mugging by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

      It's a surprise when you expect that the fence is not working...

    188. Re:Mugging by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      Wow, 400 fps from a metal BB? Man, do I feel stupid now that I wasted all that money on the Radeon 9800. When is Tom's going to publish the review?

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    189. Re:Mugging by comedian23 · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, the old "run for the safety of a peaceful area and let the people who can't afford to move suffer while we live safe in our ivory towers" defense. Unless you are suggesting that EVERYONE move to peaceful areas, but then they most certainly wouldn't be peaceful any more... Are you from New England?

    190. Re:Mugging by Particle010 · · Score: 1
      'look! I spent more money. Mine is bigger!'

      Boy! If only THAT were true!

      --
      "Not the Earth!!! That's where I keep all my stuff!!!" - The Tick
    191. Re:Mugging by ThaReetLad · · Score: 1

      I was talking about the UK. There is no "or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony" clause here and rightly so. IMHO human life is more important than ANY property right and so using potentially lethal force to protect property only is morally wrong.

      There is a famous case here where a farmer shot 2 intruders with a shotgun, one of whom he killed, and was jailed for it. He claimed he fired in self defence but balistics proved that the one he killed was unarmed, and shot in the back from several feet away as he was trying to escape, and thus not a threat. The other was hit outside the house as he tried to escape across the fields.

      There was a huge outcry and the more reactionary tabloid newspapers got on his side and the political opposition jumped on the bandwagon, but thankfully they've not managed to change the law yet.

      --
      You can't win Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    192. Re:Mugging by lonesome+phreak · · Score: 1

      I don't have to worry about it here...and I wouldn't wear them there. But I bet it might be enough to get them to back off, especially shooting in the face.

      --
      Maybe we DID take the blue pill. You wouldn't remember anyway.
    193. Re:Mugging by lonesome+phreak · · Score: 1

      Their small. And if your getting mugged...the idea would be to make them leave because they think they might get shot. Of course, why someone with an assult rifle would be walking around listening to an IPod is beyond me.

      --
      Maybe we DID take the blue pill. You wouldn't remember anyway.
    194. Re:Mugging by ThaReetLad · · Score: 1

      what if you jump out of bed, interupt them and they start to run away? Can you shoot them in the back? I hope not or your laws consider property more important than human life.

      --
      You can't win Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    195. Re:Mugging by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      was talking about the UK. There is no "or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony" clause here and rightly so. IMHO human life is more important than ANY property right and so using potentially lethal force to protect property only is morally wrong.

      To each their own. I respect your beliefs, but I will also respectfully disagree. Generally, it's not a good idea to shoot at someone attempting to flee here in the U.S. either, and the Florida statute shouldn't be construed as condoning that unless you're a law enforcement officer. Having said that, if I find an intruder in my home at 4 in the morning, I'm not really in a position to question his motives. I'd prefer not to shoot him if I can help it, but if I get even a hint that he's armed, all bets are off.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    196. Re:Mugging by mdarksbane · · Score: 1

      Umm, no.

      They're just pretty darn nice earbuds. Not amazing, but hey, I just spent $300 on a music device that comes with good earbuds. I don't see any reason to spend another $100 on a set that *might* be better.

      The whole mugging incident is because they're distinctive, as the ipod's the only music system that comes with white earpuds.

      Don't read too much into this.

    197. Re:Mugging by phoneyman · · Score: 1

      what if you jump out of bed, interupt them and they start to run away?

      How do I know that they're running away and not running to get reinforcements?

      Can you shoot them in the back?

      I'm Canadian, so the answer is that practically, no I can't.

      I hope not or your laws consider property more important than human life.

      IMO the life of someone willing to enter the dwelling of another, for the purpose of robbing them, while they are home, is not worth anything.

      Pierre

    198. Re:Mugging by ThaReetLad · · Score: 1
      IMO the life of someone willing to enter the dwelling of another, for the purpose of robbing them, while they are home, is not worth anything.

      You'll be sure to tell those comforting words to the guys starving widow and children won't you.

      I'm sorry but I find you views on the price of a human life, regardless of who they are or what they are doing absolutely disgusting.
      --
      You can't win Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    199. Re:Mugging by ThaReetLad · · Score: 1

      Yes, give them everything they want. Once someone is pointing a gun at you the chances that you will be able to kill them first are pretty minimal, especially if you don't already have one on them.

      --
      You can't win Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    200. Re:Mugging by phoneyman · · Score: 1

      You'll be sure to tell those comforting words to the guys starving widow and children won't you.

      Have you known any actual criminals? I have. I even liked them too, in a not-too-close-but-friendly kind of way. As a rough generality, these aren't your imaginary Robin Hood type criminals who are comitting crime because they have no choise. They're just fuckups, layabouts, and losers. They find it easier to do nothing most of the time (except for drugs, they do those pretty much all the time), and commit crime for a quick buck here and there when the welfare gets low.

      As another generality, they don't often support their numerous sexual partnes and offspring.

      As yet another generality, these guys aren't going to willingly enter a dwelling in which the occupants are home.

      I don't say the above to demean their existance as human beings, but only to clarify exactly who we're talking about here.

      The kind of criminal that knowingly enters a dwelling in which the occupants are home are either trying to sneak in and get away with it, or they are outright attempting a home invasion. These guys are far more dangerous because they expect an encounter with the homeowner, and are prepared to deal with it. Remember, they are not going to get caught, and they aren't going to let something like your safety and welfare get in the way of either their crime or their getaway.

      In the case of the latter criminals, their lives ain't worth squat. In the case of the former, actually encountering them during a burglary is vanishingly rare.

      I'm sorry but I find you views on the price of a human life, regardless of who they are or what they are doing absolutely disgusting.

      So, then, what should I do when I encounter a burglar in my home at night? Pack all my shit up for him, so as to prevent him from hurting his little back? Fuck that, let him run for his life.

      Pierre

    201. Re:Mugging by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      One time, this guy with white earbuds saw my iPod and gave me the knowing "hey there fellow iPod user" nod and started running on the machine next to mine.

      Ah, this is a "hey there fellow iPod user" nod, and not one of those generic "hey there fellow MP3 player user" nod? I so frequently confuse those...

    202. Re:Mugging by gbronzer · · Score: 1

      The answer is obvious... a tazer addon for the iPod. Plugs in on top and shocks the mugger when you hand it to them. The power supply is built-in. Greg

    203. Re:Mugging by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      D'oh, no more iPod music sharing with strangers you pass by on the street anymore I guess huh?

      (I can't find the story on it right now :( )

      -matt

    204. Re:Mugging by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      Of course, why someone with an assult rifle would be walking around listening to an IPod is beyond me.

      Maybe he used the assult rifle to GAIN the iPod? Ehh, that may be a bit overboard eh? :P

      -matt

    205. Re:Mugging by gurumeditationerror · · Score: 1

      The two prongs on the front are all that is really needed, but most tazers are equipped with a second set of prongs which point towards each other. The only point of those prongs are to generate an arc so that you can scare people off.

      I thought the point of the two inward facing prongs was to allow a safe discharge when discharging through the two outward facing prongs was not possible?

    206. Re:Mugging by RLW · · Score: 1

      ooh, RFID de-activated stun electrodes in the iPod head phones. You have to wear a ring or something with a tag in it (or in your eyebrows). When the iPod is on and not in range of the RFID tag it zaps!

    207. Re:Mugging by phoenix321 · · Score: 1

      I agree, pepper spray has it uses. I carry one with me, as this is the strongest personal defense allowed in my legislation.

      But this site is not instantly invalidated because there are some exxagerations.

      Sparying pepper would be the first and "safest" method of self defense up close. After all, I'm sure most sane people will have regrets if they'd killed someone, even if that person was a criminal that threatened them. Sane people regret every loss of life caused by them.

      I don't like to recount every argument from the pro-gun side, but I can hardly dismiss the logic behind their claim that a criminal can't easily pick a single unarmed victim out of a populace of randomly armed persons.

      It may be true, that you have to rely on other measures, if the crook is close enough, that they may take your gun, too or that mere money is not worth a fight - true, true and true. But not always. Sometimes, you may just pull the gun to get your wallet back, sometimes there's a witness the criminal did not notice who can interact or you may had enough time to draw the gun.

      Whatever happens, the risks for "successful muggin" go up as the percentage of armed potential victims goes up.

      As I am from Germany, I can tell you for sure, that criminals will always have guns. Private gun ownership is totally regulated here up to the point that there are almost none in private hands. Loaded or concealed carrying bring you more jail than actually the mugging people. Criminal gangs still have theirs. Police routinely busts neonazis, that sometimes even have machine guns and other heavy artillery.

      Let me conclude: not guns are the problem, the people are. People that are uneducated or immoral, that cannot judge the consequences of their actions are to blame. I admit, I don't want the current population to be able to buy guns at the local supermarket. They are largely too dumb or ignorant to care what these things can cause.

      My vision would be a population educated and compassionate and caring enough so they can be trusted to handle these guns safely. Then everyone could (and should) carry a gun for their own and others safety against criminals.

      But if the population were so brightly educated, we'd have no crime in the first place, so there's still ample room to debate this further. But not only on single issues and special situations pro or contra.

      Free men own guns, slaves don't. I second that. If the current kind of people in your country or mine cannot be trusted to own guns, I'd rather say they (or we all) are already slaves of some kind...

    208. Re:Mugging by cybermint · · Score: 1

      I think the reality would be more like

      Mugger: "Give me your--"

      Mugee: *bzzt* *bzzt*

      Mugger: "What the F*ck nigga? Yous about to lose a kneecap, son!"

      Mugger: *KAPLOW!*

      Mugee: AAAAAHHHHHHHHH! MY LEG!!!!!!!1

    209. Re:Mugging by gurumeditationerror · · Score: 1

      Learn Karate or another martial art and understand it. a Brown Belt can protect him/her self well against an armed attacker. if you can flee or end without conflict then do it, otherwise intend and attempt to disable that person that is very willing to severely hurt or kill you.

      I don't know how realistic that is man, being a brown grade in lau gar kung fu the best technique against an armed attacker we've been shown is run-the-fuck-away-fast.
      Having a solid grounding in martial arts levels the playing field against an intelligent armed opponent at best.
      Try what an earlier poster said about using a marker pen as a fake knife and see how difficult it is.

      PS, if I was caught in a knife fight I couldn't get out of and was lucky enough (yeah, I'd consider it luck) to get the knife off my attacker I'd put it in his neck or I'd be stamping on his throat. No breaking arms. No holds. No bravado. I'm going to kill him 'cos I'll be scared shitless.

  2. mugging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    thats how i got mine :)

  3. That's why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I keep the mini-iPod in a ... hidden place... that's very snug. Muggers never look there, and really, who wants to pull the cord out of there?

    1. Re:That's why by DarkFencer · · Score: 4, Funny

      So that's why the iPod Mini sold out!

      I was wondering why people were paying more for less GB. I gues size does matter :)

    2. Re:That's why by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 5, Funny
      I keep the mini-iPod in a ... hidden place... that's very snug. Muggers never look there, and really, who wants to pull the cord out of there?

      And you probably can't wait for them to add a sub-woofer in the next model.

      --
      "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    3. Re:That's why by edrugtrader · · Score: 1

      sure, a little funny, but the article (that you read...) says that muggers know you have the ipod by the white headphones that ARE COMING OUT OF YOUR ASS. not by actually seeing the ipod.

      --
      MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
    4. Re:That's why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The way your dad looked at it, this iPod-mini was your birthright. He'd be damned if any of the slopes were gonna get their greasy yellow hands on his boy's birthright. So he hid it in the one place he knew he could hide something: his ass. Five long years, he wore this iPod up his ass. Then when he died of dysentery, he gave me the iPod. I hid this uncomfortable piece of plastic and metal up my ass for two years. Then, after seven years, I was sent home to my family. And now, little man, I give the iPod to you.

    5. Re:That's why by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or, keep that hidden place un-hidden. When was the last time a nudist was mugged in your neighborhood? Never? See, it works!

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    6. Re:That's why by trentblase · · Score: 2, Funny

      Lisa, I'd like to buy your rock.

    7. Re:That's why by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 4, Funny

      What happens when you fart?

      That's how you switch playlists.

    8. Re:That's why by the+argonaut · · Score: 4, Funny

      You sir are a cut and paste god among men. I salute you.

      Too bad you're an AC and can't get proper credit for your work.

      Almost shat out my iPod i laughed so hard.

      --
      fuck you.
    9. Re:That's why by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      And you probably can't wait for them to add a sub-woofer in the next model.

      When I was younger there were people who wouldl call Subs "Rumps", I guess now I know why.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    10. Re:That's why by ElYonderboy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Too bad the battery crapped out only 18 months into the internment.

      So to speak.

    11. Re:That's why by Bryan_W · · Score: 3, Informative
      The orignial quote:
      The way your dad looked at it, this watch was your birthright. He'd be damned if any of the slopes were gonna get their greasy yellow hands on his boy's birthright. So he hid it in the one place he knew he could hide something: his ass. Five long years, he wore this watch up his ass. Then when he died of dysentery, he gave me the watch. I hid this uncomfortable piece of metal up my ass for two years. Then, after seven years, I was sent home to my family. And now, little man, I give the watch to you. --Captain Koons, Pulp Fiction
    12. Re:That's why by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      A place like this?
      Stick *that* in your ear.
      I don't think there's a methane power conversion, though.

    13. Re:That's why by k_killmore · · Score: 1

      I wonder if Apple Care covers that sort of thing...

    14. Re:That's why by ozbird · · Score: 1

      Why do you think they're nude? "Hand over your designer jeans, shirt, sneakers, sunglasses, bling bling, iPod - and the lupins!"

  4. That Sucks by General+Newcomb · · Score: 2, Funny

    Like my mother used to say: "Can't we have nice things!"

  5. My iPod case holds pepper spray by The+I+Shing · · Score: 4, Funny

    This iPod-carrying bon vivant isn't going to hand over his beloved music player without a fight.

    I've hacked my iPod to shoot pepper spray! Ha!

    --
    You are in error. No-one is screaming. Thank you for your cooperation.
    1. Re:My iPod case holds pepper spray by boarder8925 · · Score: 1

      I've hacked my iPod to self-destruct! If I can't have it, no one can!

      Really, though, I think the pepper spray idea is much better. And non-product-harming.

    2. Re:My iPod case holds pepper spray by jcr · · Score: 1

      Ya know, if you just had a about a 1 foot strap on the iPod case, you'd be able to brain any clown with a knife.. I think the iPod's shock rating could take it, even!

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  6. The Next Apple Innovation by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 4, Funny

    iPod -- with LoJack!

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:The Next Apple Innovation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Christ no! They'd call it iLoJack.

    2. Re:The Next Apple Innovation by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 4, Funny
      Christ no! They'd call it iLoJack.

      And considering that it plays music, and Apple is known for frequent updates, would the next model be jLoJack?

      --
      "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    3. Re:The Next Apple Innovation by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      they could come up with a branded model, too, and cash in on the Jennifer Lopez craze.

      It would be the JLoJack.

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    4. Re:The Next Apple Innovation by jea6 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not that bad an idea. You generally need iTunes to use and iPod, right? And each iPod must have a unique identifier (presumably for DRM among other reasons), right?

      Well, you could register your iPod as stolen and the next usage connected to iTunes could be noted by Apple. Then either a lo-jack scenario ensues OR your iPod gets locked with a "stolen ipod" screen.

      Of course there are liabilities, jurisdictional, law enforcement, and practical reasons why this would be a no go. But it could be done.

      --

      sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.
    5. Re:The Next Apple Innovation by LostCluster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There's an interesting point. An iPod is next to useless without using iTunes. Maybe iPods phoning their serial numbers home might not be that bad a thing afterall. Report it as stolen, and then when it shows up next talking to the iTunes Music Store (or maybe just even the already Internet aware iTunes) and it's instantly located.

    6. Re:The Next Apple Innovation by tanguyr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      let me get this straight: you're advocating that a big company track your movements using what amounts to spyware in the product that they sold you? They told me this part of Slashdot was different, but i didn't think it was this different ;)

      --
      #!/usr/bin/english
    7. Re:The Next Apple Innovation by mhore · · Score: 4, Informative
      And each iPod must have a unique identifier (presumably for DRM among other reasons), right?



      Just a quick note to let you know -- they DO in fact have a unique identifier. All Apple products (computer-wise, anyway) do. My powerbook and iPod both have serial numbers that I registered with Apple when I bought them.

      --

      Mmmm......sacrelicious.

    8. Re:The Next Apple Innovation by illuminatedwax · · Score: 1

      As a side note, I really like the whole Lo-Jack idea, but I don't want the police knowing where I am at all times either. Are there any do-it-yourself homing devices out there or places in Malaysia where I can pick one up myself? Or better yet, where would be a good place to find out how they work?

      Are self-made homing devices even legal? Do they even exist without a large network like Lo-Jack probably has?

      Inquiring minds want to know (and are too busy to use Google)

      --Stephen

      --
      Did you ever notice that *nix doesn't even cover Linux?
    9. Re:The Next Apple Innovation by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 3, Informative

      An iPod can be loaded with music without using iTunes.

      Check ephPod.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    10. Re:The Next Apple Innovation by Teddy+Beartuzzi · · Score: 1

      If it wasn't turned on until you specifically reported it stolen? Sure, why not?

    11. Re:The Next Apple Innovation by senatorpjt · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, because threatening a guy at knifepoint is one thing, but most criminals draw the line at pirating music.

    12. Re:The Next Apple Innovation by tanguyr · · Score: 1

      relax, i was just foolin'

      there's a system like this for gsm phones called International Mobile Equipment Identity

      --
      #!/usr/bin/english
    13. Re:The Next Apple Innovation by timbos · · Score: 1

      How long before we get the `iPod recoevered in NYPD sting', similar to the Segway?

    14. Re:The Next Apple Innovation by xenoandroid · · Score: 1

      But most muggers won't think of that at first, also if they sell it to someone that person will most likely never think of that unless they know it's stolen and not sold used by the original owner over ebay.

    15. Re:The Next Apple Innovation by wongaboo · · Score: 1

      You're kidding right? A. Many people who have an iPod do not use the apple music store they download it for free. B. iTunes interfaces with the iPod and the Apple store never directly. Therefore, without some significant changes to iTunes there is no way to tell what devices the program is sending music too. C. This is Slashdot? Can you imagine the uproar of the Slashdot crowd if any computer manufacture produced a product that reported on it's owners whereabouts, or forget that, so much as required an internet check in every time you wanted to use the thing. It would be hacked in a week.

      --
      cogito ergo oro
    16. Re:The Next Apple Innovation by mcpkaaos · · Score: 1

      would the next model be jLoJack

      No, I think that term is reserved exclusively for Ben Affleck.

      --
      It goes from God, to Jerry, to me.
    17. Re:The Next Apple Innovation by jazzis · · Score: 1

      "An iPod is next to useless without using iTunes." Ever hear of a external Firewire Drive or a Firewire Boot Drive with Mac OS X? Musicians and recording engineers routinely use these to carry the mix home or to overdub tracks. iTunes is not nesessary to use an iPod if you are creative and have a clue...

    18. Re:The Next Apple Innovation by rsmith-mac · · Score: 1

      And if you want to go one step further, get laser engraving on your iPod when you order it. This way, it's blatently obvious if it's your iPod or not, without needing to check the settings for the S/N.

    19. Re:The Next Apple Innovation by Kris_J · · Score: 1
      An iPod is next to useless without using iTunes.
      Huh? There are plenty of other programs out there that will sync an iPod. Personally, I use the bundled Musicmatch.
    20. Re:The Next Apple Innovation by Natchswing · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually I use Ephpod to upload music to my ipod. I have itunes but have never been able to get itunes to recognize my ipod.

    21. Re:The Next Apple Innovation by cyberworm · · Score: 1

      I think in addition to the unique identifier, not having the cables to charge it/upload music to it would be another way that would totally screw anyone that hijacks an iPod. I certainly don't carry my charger around with me. On top of that, someone mentioned that a mugger with a gun isn't going to let you get your gun out. Well, how do they know I'm getting my iPod out instead of my ppk or other such small pocket sized gun?

    22. Re:The Next Apple Innovation by Moofie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why would it be illegal for me to built a tracking device I put on my property?

      Sure, you could do illegal things with it, but I can do illegal things with a screwdriver. Or my penis. Or both. Simultaneously.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    23. Re:The Next Apple Innovation by Neophytus · · Score: 1

      it also kills the resale value, so for some it's not really worth it

    24. Re:The Next Apple Innovation by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 2, Informative
      If you pirate music, you get a million-dollar lawsuit. Mugging probably gets you 2-3 years.

      Given the choice, I'd go for 2-3 years. I don't earn 300-500K per annum.

    25. Re:The Next Apple Innovation by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      If someone buys a stolen iPod on ebay, not knowing its stolen, and it were to report home "I was stolen", then the seller has committed a crime and the appropriate agencies can be used to trace the seller and retrieve the money. Meantime, the stolen iPod could be reunited with its owner.

      And if it becomes known that a stolen iPod phones home, then the first thing a mugger *will* think of is "Damn, better not fire up iTunes." Criminals aren't all stupid.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
  7. The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by meshmar · · Score: 5, Funny

    let a mugger have it and have your insurance buy you a replacement.

    1. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by packeteer · · Score: 1, Troll

      This is why this happens in the UK and not in America. You see us free Americans have a right to carry guns, lots of em, thats why muggings dont happen in America.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    2. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by tomcrick · · Score: 1, Interesting

      ...thats why muggings dont happen in America.

      Surely that was said in jest!

      Seriously though, I bet Apple are loving this - how much more hype could you want! Let's all say it together....

      ...STATUS SYMBOL!

    3. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by gregmac · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is why this happens in the UK and not in America. You see us free Americans have a right to carry guns, lots of em, thats why muggings dont happen in America.

      And the thing you don't realize is this also means the muggers have guns. And guess what? Having a gun is useless when a mugger pulls one on you first. Do you think he's just going to sit there and let you pull out your gun? In fact, at the end of it all, you'll probably be out an iPod AND a gun.

      Either way, isn't it still illegal to carry around a gun? I thought you could have them in your houses, but that was it.. ?

      --
      Speak before you think
    4. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by BobTheLawyer · · Score: 1

      of course you're allowed to defend yourself against muggers, or anyone else, you're just not allowed to own most types of gun*.

      The bright side is, of course, that it's almost unheard of for a mugger in the UK to have a gun.

    5. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by prockcore · · Score: 3, Funny

      The hypothetical mugger is going to have a hell of a time getting away without getting shot in the back.

      I think you missed the part where the mugger took your $300 gun as well as your $300 ipod.

    6. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by hawkfish · · Score: 1
      anyone skilled in martial arts could easily beat such an opponent
      Martial artist here, with some experience with knives.

      In close quarters, knives are more dangerous than guns. You are going to get cut in a knife fight, period, and anyone who tells you differently is a dangerous fsck who you should not let teach you anything. One of my instructors did a drill with me a few weeks back to impress on us how easy it is to get cut - I had no trouble cutting him and I am pretty inexperienced.

      And this is if you have a knife as well. If you don't, the usual advice is to get the hell out of there.

      Guns are illegal there, so you're not allowed to defend yourself against muggers.
      Speaking of flamebait...

      Guns are not illegal in England, they are just much more heavily regulated. They are regulated in the US as well, but just not as much.
      --
      You will not drink with us, but you would taste our steel? - Walter Matthau, The Pirates
    7. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 2, Informative

      Concealed carry requires a license. In any case, it's not impossible for a mugger to get shot by his intended victim, and this scares a lot of people off from mugging in the first place. And they don't necessarily take the gun, they don't always know you have it.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    8. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by bugbread · · Score: 1

      thats why muggings dont happen in America.

      Tell that to my mom or my college roommate.

    9. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by joggle · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, if it's the typical woman carrying a concealed gun, then they probably will make off with the gun since it's in the purse they snatched.

    10. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by DAldredge · · Score: 3, Flamebait

      Then explain why the UK's rate of gun related crime is going thru the roof?

      I KNOW!@!!!! The people already breaking the damn law to rob/rape you don't really care if they break another one!

    11. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by Dimensio · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And the thing you don't realize is this also means the muggers have guns.

      As opposed to places like the UK, where the muggers are the only ones who have the guns (because they don't care about the law in the first place, or they wouldn't be muggers) and people in the UK are prohibited by law from defending themselves, lest they find themselves facing charges far more serious than would a mugger.

    12. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

      thats why muggings dont happen in America.


      They don't?

    13. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by the+argonaut · · Score: 1

      Of course walking around wearing a pricey pair of headphones isn't a giveaway that you're probably listening to a pricey music player. At least it doesn't ID it as an iPod, I guess.

      On a more serious note, I have never understood the iPod as status symbol/fashion accessory anyways. In fact, I find it quite annoying (if I see one more damn mini on somebody's arm who isn't jogging or working out I'm going to f***ing scream). I prefer to keep it safely tucked away in the bottom of my backpack with only the remote protruding, and of course the telltale while earphones, though that because I'm too lazy and cheap to get a different pair of headphones. I've even toyed with sewing the remote into the strap of my backpack, something similar to this or this, both of which are unfortunately lacking compared to my current backpack, IMHO.

      The only thing I dislike about this setup is that the remote doesn't give you full control, but who knows, maybe Apple will fix that with the next iPod rev.

      --
      fuck you.
    14. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Ladies, don't keep your guns in your purse.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    15. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by dalutong · · Score: 1

      Just so you know --

      that's also why we have ten-times the murder rate of england or japan and a similarly higher violent crime rate.

      --

      What comes first, finding a teacher or becoming a student?
    16. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by johnatjohnytech · · Score: 1

      I think he meant it Texas

    17. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by vanillacoke · · Score: 1

      Muggers generaly dont pat you down like a cop. Just hand them your ipod and wallet.... They never notice the ankle holster.

      --
      The secret to getting modded up is to allways say i've got karma to burn in your sig..
    18. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Uh, the number of people killed in the UK by guns last year was a little over 100. That's for a country with a population of about 60 million. Now compare that to the US, with a population of about 5 times that. How many Americans were shot and killed last year? 10,000? 15,000? More? It sure the hell wasn't 500 or so, was it?

      The idea that gun-related crime is "going thru the roof" in the UK is a fallacy. For one thing, the very definition of a gun-related crime in the UK is much looser than it is in the US. In the UK, any crime where a gun is believed to have been used is classified as gun-related, which means if you were to hold up a bank with an imitation firearm, a banana or even two fingers in your pocket it would go down on the books as a gun-related crime.

      So, comparing US and UK gun crime figures isn't as straightforward as you would like to think. Even if you did assume you were comparing apples and apples, rather than apples and oranges, you'd still find that gun crime in the UK is virtually unheard of compared to the US.

      Bottom line is this: you are far more likely to be the victim of a gun crime in the US than in the UK or almost any other society in the Western world.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    19. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by YOU+LIKEWISE+FAIL+IT · · Score: 1

      Never has the disparity between original thread subject line and post content been funnier.

      --
      One god, one market, one truth, one consumer.
    20. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by jcr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Having a gun is useless when a mugger pulls one on you first.

      Not necessarily. If he doesn't know you have one, you give him the money, and then shoot him in the back as he's leaving.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    21. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by painehope · · Score: 1

      While the poster you're responding to is being a sarcastic jackass, there's a few things everyone should know :

      1) Guns do deter crime.
      2) Depending on the state, you do have a right to carry gun(s).
      3) To get the drop on someone ( like you mention in your comment ), that person has to be unobservant. Watch your surroundings, and noone will get the drop on you. And even if someone does have the drop on you, how quickly can they react? If you want an interesting test, have someone put a gun to your back. Spin ( moving out of the line of fire as you do ) and throw a blow ( or grab the gun, kick, etc. ). Unless you're really slow, you should at the very least be able to get out of the line of fire before they react. Cool trick, courtesy of some survivalist nut I used to know.

      --
      PC moderators can suck my White pierced, tattooed dick. If you think pride == hate, s/dick/Aryan meat mallet/g.
    22. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by kyz · · Score: 1

      Dimensio, I know you from way back. You're the same of reactionary dickwad that thinks SPEWS is a good idea. It ain't.

      Please keep your Libertarian views out of our country (the UK). The will of the UK people is to remain gun-free. After Thomas Hamilton dropped his science on those assembled, the people of the UK demanded a hand-gun ban. Whether you think we're smoking crack or not, we are entitled to our own legislation. So quit bitching about it, you have no voice in our country.

      Muggers do not generally carry guns. This is because most muggers are not random opportunists, they are drug-users with a track record of mugging and are known to the police. They are not going to risk carrying a gun, because it doesn't improve their mugging, and it's immediate jailtime just for having a gun (or a knife). If they don't have any weapons, the worst they can be done for is loitering with intent. Unlike the US, the UK police actually have to protect their citizens.

      Only yeehaw cowboys call brandishing an offensive weapon "defense". We ship all ours over to the US as soon as we get the chance. If they're happy to live in a land of gun fetishists, they're welcome. Meanwhile, your favourite weapon of statistics tells us more people are killed in gun accidents in the US than people in the UK are killed by gun accidents and gun crime put together.

      --
      Does my bum look big in this?
    23. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      First off, do not put words in my mouth by limiting the discussion to gun deaths. Second, if your gun control laws worked then the rates would be going down. They are not.

      But hell, your govement was trying to get rid of 'double jeropody' a few months ago...

      http://www.guardian.co.uk/gun/Story/0,2763,10564 12 ,00.html

      Gun crime spreads 'like a cancer' across Britain

      As the number of weapons on the streets grows and shootings become the norm, gun law is back at the top of the political agenda

      http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=U TF -8&q=uk+gun+crime+increase&btnG=Google+Sea rch

    24. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      There's a legal battle going on in the US dealing with consealed carry laws. Many states have realized that they can not prevent you from carrying a consealed gun. The exceptions seem to be the most heavily populated areas. Chicago, New york and the like.

      Considering that the police are under no obligation to protect you, I see this as a good thing.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    25. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by jjhlk · · Score: 1

      How about weight differences? From a book I skimmed on brazilian jiujitsu, it seemed like you'd be pretty fucked in a fight against a mugger if he had 80 pounds on you, and wasn't a completely klutz.

    26. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      Unless you're really slow, you should at the very least be able to get out of the line of fire before they react.

      Um, considering that they probably a) have their finger on the trigger and b) have the saftey off, is that really something you'd want to do? I think you'd be as likely to get yourself shot as taking the gun away from the mugger.

      And as far as reducing drime goes, I'm skeptical. If you're being held up at gunpoint, if you go for your concealed gun you're just going to get yourself shot, again. If its not concealed, I'd just hit you on the back of the head and get a free gun in addition to your wallet.

    27. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by dR.fuZZo · · Score: 1

      Either way, isn't it still illegal to carry around a gun? I thought you could have them in your houses, but that was it.. ?

      A growing number of states allow you to get a permit to carry a concealed weapon.

      --
      -- dR.fuZZo
    28. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by McCart42 · · Score: 1

      IANAL, but you would go to jail for that, or pay a steep fine. Shooting a criminal in the act of fleeing - in other words, a criminal who poses no further threat to your personal safety, is crossing a line.

      However, the argument generally used in a situation such as this is that if concealed carry is legal, someone around you may notice your plight and pull out their concealed weapon, making the situation much more difficult for the mugger. If the mugger then aims his gun at the person pointing the gun at him, that person has every right to shoot as they have been threatened.

      --
      "I may be quite wrong." - Socrates
    29. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by madcow_ucsb · · Score: 1

      The hypothetical mugger is going to have a hell of a time getting away without getting shot in the back.

      True, although most states frown upon shooting people in the back as they're running away...maybe if you lived in Texas :)

    30. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by antirename · · Score: 1

      Ok, this needs a response... the first of knife fighting is YOU'RE GOING TO GET CUT. The second rule is... well, you get the idea. Yeah, I've had training in taking knives away from bad guys, and I've tried this once in the real world(crackhead tried to mug me). Guess what happens when the crackhead tries to run, trips, and you've got his arm grabbed when you both fall? Yeah, you guessed it, I got cut. Also the "skilled in martial arts" thing is bullshit: If you're tired, and your would-be-mugger is on drugs and doesn't give a shit, bad things can still happen. Even skinny crackheads can be stronger than they look, and the don't say HAI! or use martial arts moves. They either try to hurt you (in some fucked up way that you never practiced for) or run off. You don't want to get close enough to a mugger for a punching match if you have a choice. Another bit of advice: carry a big gun, or as big as you can hide. Pull a little one and the hopped up mugger might not notice. Yeah, that happened once too... but the dumbass ran into a store and called the cops on ME for pulling a gun when he realized what was going on. Now I carry a bigger one. Yeah, he got arrested (dumbass) and he was probably typical. See, muggers aren't real smart. If they were they wouldn't be muggers. If you live in a free country that allows such things carry a large, effective gun, and take it out if you really think your life is in danger. That usually ends it... the mugger runs off BEFORE he gets close enough to cut you. You get to go home and have a beer in peace without having to explain to the SO why you're bleeding on the rug, or having to explain to the cops why John Doe crackhead is bleeding all over the sidewalk. Enough said.

    31. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by jcr · · Score: 1

      IANAL, but you would go to jail for that, or pay a steep fine.

      "It was dark, I thought he was coming back for me, I don't know which way he was facing, it all happened so fast!"

      Of course, you're also presuming that one would stick around to discuss it after dropping the perp..

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    32. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by Jodka · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "And the thing you don't realize is this also means the muggers have guns."

      If guns are legal then muggers will have guns. If guns are illegal then muggers will have guns. Gun control laws insure that law-abiding citizens will be out-gunned by criminals. The gun control debate is not about whether we allow criminals to carry guns. Criminals will carry guns regardless of the law. Criminals, by definition, break the law. The gun control debate is really about whether it should be legal for potential victims to carry guns.

      "Having a gun is useless when a mugger pulls one on you first."

      It usually works that way in movies and TV. You might be confusing those things with the real world. The possibility that potential victims and bystanders are armed is a significant deterent to crime. The actual fact of the matter is that victims and bystanders do draw and fire. When I was living in Tennesee two guys in black ski masks pulled up to an all-night convenience in a stolen van, burst in with semi-automatic rifles and opened fire on the clerk. The clerk pulled his pistol and fired five shots; Three bullets into the heart of one assailant and two into the heart of the other.

      You seem too focused on this one scenerio of an armed attacker holding up one person in isolation. Armed assailants have no advantage in a crowds where the average citizen is packing. They are immediatly outgunned. You can "get the draw" on one person or perhaps a tightly clustered group of a few people. You can't get the draw on a crowd of people scattered around a bank lobby or convenience store when ordinary citizens are carrying concealed weapons. This goes for city streets and iPods too.

      Gun control laws are an aberation created when a society stops taking crime seriously. In a society under threat law-abiding citizens need the right to be as well armed as are their attackers.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une signature.
    33. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      And the thing you don't realize is this also means the muggers have guns.

      Yes, because if guns are illegal there is absolutely no way that a criminal might gain access to 1920's technology, especially since it's a given that he's willing to break the law. [/sarcasm]

      And guess what? Having a gun is useless when a mugger pulls one on you first.

      Riiighhht......because:
      A. A mugger NEVER asks you to take anything out of your pocket.
      B. There isn't even the slightest possibility that you might ummmmm SEE SOMEONE COMING.

      Do you think he's just going to sit there and let you pull out your gun?

      No he's going to expect you to get you wallet from your back pocket. Instead of giving him your wallet, you give him a bullet or five.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    34. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And when the detectives show up at your door, how do you explain why you shot someone, then went home and didn't report it? If you were an innocent victim, you'd call the police, right?

    35. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by AhBeeDoi · · Score: 1

      If ordinary citizens can't have iPods, then only criminals will have them.

    36. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by Dwarfgoat · · Score: 1

      Okay, I modded the parent funny, but...

      $300 for a gun? Maybe a low-end Remington shotgun at WalMart! Last handgun I bought was more like $1,200. Though, to be fair, my first was $450 (used). That's just about the best price I've seen around here (even if it was a pretty well beaten and banged up H&K)

      To quote my GF, "Oh great, geeks with guns." Hey, we all need a hobby! How many other folks out there bought a Desert Eagle because of Vinnie Jones's monologue in "Snatch?" I know you're out there! I mean...it's sooooo shiny!

      Holy shit...a liberal with a gun collection, and CCW permit! Head for the hills!

      --
      That? That was a pigeon.
    37. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by BobTheLawyer · · Score: 1

      ignorant claptrap. The law allows you to use reasonable force to defend yourself or your property. This is essentially the same as the law in most US jurisdictions.

      If you think someone should be able to use *unreasonable* force then you should say so, and not hide behind half truths and poorly written news articles.

    38. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by teslafreak · · Score: 1

      You carry a .44 mag, nice! Yeah, i bet that would make most muggers wet their pants.

    39. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by CGP314 · · Score: 1

      This is why this happens in the UK and not in America. You see us free Americans have a right to carry guns, lots of em, thats why muggings dont happen in America.

      Since I moved to London and not New York, my chances of being murdered dropped from 16.8 in 100,000 to 2.1 in 100,000. If you read this article, you will see that of the most murderous cities in the world, the first six are in the United States. Granted, this article doesn't directly address gun control, but I think it is some evidence against the "We are safer in the US because we have so many guns" argument.

    40. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by myg · · Score: 1
      Actually, although the law varies from state-to-state; quite a few states define it as a life threatening situation. So even if you shoot somebody in the back, if you they had a weapon you could say you feared they would use it on you as they walked away. This is especially plausable if they weren't running but were walking.

      If you carry a CCW, you should know the law for your particular state very well.

    41. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      After Thomas Hamilton dropped his science on those assembled, the people of the UK demanded a hand-gun ban.

      A sad piece of knee-jerk legislation based on a single incident. A bit like banning alcohol because of one drink-drive death. When someone does a mass stabbing with a kitchen knife, will the government ban those?

      Thousands of people who enjoyed shooting as a sport now have to travel to France to enjoy it. It's typical behaviour of people here. Never mind the people with minority interests, if it doesn't affect me, go ahead and ban it.

      I wonder what would have happened if Thomas Hamilton hadn't turned the gun on himself. I doubt the legislation would have been passed. But in the absence of a person to blame, something else has to be found by the media.

    42. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 2, Insightful
      For decades in the UK, gun ownership has been very low. And yet our gun crime rate is almost insignificant. What do I think my chances are that if I'm mugged, that I will be mugged by someone with a gun? Less than 1%. There's a few areas of the UK where the percentage would rise, but even then, not by much.

      Even when handguns were legal, hardly anyone had them. Shotguns are legal with a license, and of the hundreds of people I know, I can think of 2 people I know who own a shotgun. The first uses his for clay pigeon shooting, the second for his part time job as a vermin exterminator. Hardly anyone has them for protection.

    43. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by pjt33 · · Score: 1
      If guns are illegal then muggers will have guns.
      Why? A baseball bat or a knife are both effective for threatening people at close range, and getting hold of a gun isn't necessarily easy. "Professional" muggers may have guns, but casual muggers in most parts of the UK still use knives.
      You seem too focused on this one scenerio of an armed attacker holding up one person in isolation.
      A crowd isn't the best situation for a mugging - too many witnesses. In a crowd, pick-pocketing is the way forward.
    44. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 1
      people in the UK are prohibited by law from defending themselves,

      Wrong. Incorrect. You have been misinformed. Lied to. Britons are not prohibited from defending themselves. If someone attacks you, putting you in fear of your life, you are allowed to use violent force.

      What you are not allowed to do is lie in wait with a shotgun and shoot an unarmed burglar in the back. Your property is not yourself.

      A recent case from The Guardian shows where the law lies.

    45. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by painehope · · Score: 1

      Actually, I've done this before. And who said anything about going for a gun? If I'm close enough to make a move, I'm just going to whip your ass and get your free gun.

      And for reducing crime, it all comes back to being aware. I'm not going to have to go for my concealed gun, because if I'm carrying a handgun, and there's anything going down, it's already in my hand.

      --
      PC moderators can suck my White pierced, tattooed dick. If you think pride == hate, s/dick/Aryan meat mallet/g.
    46. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Thomas Hamilton wasn't a minor and could have bought a kitchen knife. If he was a risk, then either the officer who granted him a license should have been disciplined or the process amended. Instead, because handguns are quite a minority interest, most people don't care about the rights of people who want to shoot with them for sport.

      As for the shooting, it's a particular type of shooting - target shooting with handguns. I don't know if you can still own something like a .22 or a .303 for target shooting, but a shotgun isn't really good for shooting.

      For your information, I'm not a "gun nut". I don't shoot, and haven't since I was about 16. I'm not even interested in it. I just take the view that I have certain innocent pleasures in my life that I'd hate for someone to take away, so I'm willing to spend time defending other people's rights to their innocent pleasures.

      I know, let's ban alcohol and restrict cars to 10mph. No-one will get hurt then.

    47. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      Googling yielded a $200 handgun easily. Of course, you aren't going to be doing fancy target shooting with said gun, but it probably does a reasonable job of rapidly shoving a piece of metal into someone nearby.

    48. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by Dwarfgoat · · Score: 1

      Aye, it probably does, at that.

      You know what's just damn ironic? My freaking iPod battery died today. Wow...That means I just posted something on topic for the subject line! Does that mean I'm banned from slashdot now? haha

      --
      That? That was a pigeon.
    49. Re:The solution to the dying iPod battery is ... by MochaMan · · Score: 1

      If this is the reality of America, then I am incredibly glad I don't live there.

  8. Muggage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dude, I'm, like totally understanding of your verbage, but, like, there might not be others, that, like, know.
    But rock on, Dude! Awesome!

    1. Re:muggage? by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 4, Funny
      total Buffy speak.

      Next time I'm subjected to some muggage I'll whip out Mr. Pointy and deal out some slayage.

      And they claim language is dead...

      --

      My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    2. Re:muggage? by Theaetetus · · Score: 1
      Next time I'm subjected to some muggage I'll whip out Mr. Pointy and deal out some slayage.

      I'd rather whip out Mr. Pointy next time I'm subjected to some Buffy. ;) [/crass]

      -T

    3. Re:muggage? by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      I have no mod points, but if I did I would give them all to you for that... crass maybe, but very funny. You made me laugh out loud.

  9. Self defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    How about an iMace accessory?

    1. Re:Self Defense by Dominic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hmm.. so you would consider killing someone rather than lose a couple of hundred dollars worth of electronics? I think I prefer the sound of the West Midlands...

    2. Re:Self Defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I carry a concelead handgun. Should someone attempt to mug me they would be quite sorry.

      What I'm hearing you say is that if I decided to mug you, I would walk away with both an iPod and a handgun.

      For most people, carried weapons do little more than provide them with a false sense of security. It's not uncommon for people without a lot of actual experience to mention "I have a ..." when the subject of crime or physical danger comes up. Sometimes it's mace or pepper spray, and I ask to see it. It gives them something to think about when I then spray myself with it and am obviously not incapacitated, because more often than not, they've never actually practiced with it and they don't have a plan B. Similar situation with guns.

      A lot of people who carry handguns assume that things are simple - just point a gun at someone, and you're in control and that's the end of it. It's not that simple, especially when the person you want to control is standing right next to you and is watching very closely to see how you're about to react. The likelihood of you being able to pull a gun out and have everything happen as you would like is almost nil. Even people with a lot of training and who think about that stuff on an ongoing basis as part of their jobs get killed with their own weapons.

      Think safety. Be aware of your surroundings and think in terms of deescalation of a situation. If you're threatened with physical violence and your instincts tell you that the perp will calm down and go away if you give up the goods, don't discount that as a viable option. Have a plan B, plan C, a plan D. If you think "I've got a gun." and don't think much beyond that point, then I just hope you never even have to deal with it.

    3. Re:Self Defense by radish · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've been mugged 3 times. At no point was my life in danger at any point. Had guns been involved, it could very easily have been different. As the old saying, the absolute surest way of getting yourself shot is to carry a gun.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    4. Re:Self defense by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      Only if it's a +3 iMace of Disruption or better..

    5. Re:Self Defense by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1
      Now in the UK ... muggings are much more common than in the USA.
      I nearly choked when I saw this. Looks like we need some figures...
      Home Office figures showed the murder rate in the US in 1998 was 6.3 per 100,000 people compared with 1.4 per 100,000 in England and Wales. The murder rate in London is 2.9 per 100,000 compared with 8.6 per 100,000 in New York and 49.15 per 100,000 in Washington DC. A report produced by the US Department of Justice in 1998 would appear to support the Home Office's claims. Source: BBC
      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    6. Re:Self Defense by JewFish · · Score: 1

      You produce murder rate stats for London, New York, and Washington DC. All of those cities have one thing in common, it is essentially illegal to own a handgun in them.

      I would be interested in finding out the mugging rate of London and comparing that to some American cities where they don't have total GUN BANS.

    7. Re:Self Defense by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      Hmm.. so you would consider killing someone rather than lose a couple of hundred dollars worth of electronics?

      Yes. Yes I would.

    8. Re:Self Defense by antirename · · Score: 1

      That's more than made up for by the people with actual experience and hundreds of thousands of rounds worth of trigger time... see, the crackhead really can't tell the difference, now can he?

    9. Re:Self defense by Deekin_Scalesinger · · Score: 1

      Enserric the Longsword would be a nice choice too with his -6 Con draining to give you that uber edge.

      --
      "As the intrepid kobold companion continues his journey, he begins to wonder... if priests raises dead, why anybody die?
    10. Re:Self defense by srcosmo · · Score: 1
      How about an iMace accessory?

      **pictures a spiky metal iPod swung on a chain..**

      --
      free speach
      Did you mean: free speech
    11. Re:Self Defense by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      I nearly choked when I saw this. Looks like we need some figures...

      Call me silly, but why didn't you give *mugging*-related figures instead of *murder*-related figures? What does the fact that some guy got poisoned for his life insurance by his wife have to do with muggings at all?

    12. Re:Self Defense by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      "I've been mugged 3 times"

      Maybe you should try moving to somewhere where people carry guns, then you might not have to get mugged again.

      "As the old saying, the absolute surest way of getting yourself shot is to carry a gun."

      So why is it that murder rates dropped in US states with mandatory concealed carry permit issue?

      In the real world, it's well established in criminology that a criminal with a knife is far more likely to use it than a criminal with a gun (though if they do use it, you're more likely to be killed by a gunshot than by being stabbed). See Gary Kleck's work, for example.

    13. Re:Self Defense by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Completely useless on the street. The mugger will in most cases be faster, tougher, and a lot more used to these situations than you. Unless you're being mugged by cardboard posters standing 30 meters away from you all that target work won't matter.

    14. Re:Self Defense by BoltInMyEar · · Score: 1

      Maybe you ought to go and look up the latest (Year 2000 and newer) MUGGING statistics. You're quoting ones for murder.

      The U.S. does still lead in murder. For just about every other type of violent crime (muggings, rape, "hot" burglaries, etc) as well as property crimes, the U.K. takes top honors.

    15. Re:Self Defense by dmccarty · · Score: 1

      If your life was never in danger at any point why did you let them mug you?

      --
      Have fun: Join D.N.A. (National Dyslexics Association)
  10. Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    That's why I clip mine to the back of my belt. Right next to my HK .40 USP.

    1. Re:Well by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      So when the mugger reaches for your iPod, he grabs your handgun instead?

      Oh, that's a wonderful idea.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  11. muggage? by gbjbaanb · · Score: 3, Funny

    target passersby for muggage

    eh? 'excuse me sir, I noticed you passing by and wondered if you'd like some hot, sweet muggage. only $1 a bowl.' :)

  12. hmmm... by BattleTroll · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mugger: "Your I-Pod or your life..."

    Mr Benny: ...

    Mugger: I SAID, your I-POD or your LIFE!

    Mr Benny: Hold on! I'm thinking!

    buhbumpbump...

    1. Re:hmmm... by cetan · · Score: 1

      actually I believe it's: "I'm thinking it over."

      But hurray for Jack Benny. It's rare to see him mentioned on /.

      --
      In Soviet Russia...michael would be rotting in Siberia!
    2. Re:hmmm... by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Funny

      Mugger: I SAID, your I-POD or your LIFE!
      iGeek: Uhm, what's the difference?

    3. Re:hmmm... by Neil+Blender · · Score: 2, Funny

      Mugger: I SAID, your I-POD or your LIFE!
      iGeek: Uhm, what's the difference?

      I think you mean:

      Mugger: I SAID, your I-POD or your LIFE!
      iGeek: Ell Oh Ell, the jokes on you - I don't have even have a life!

    4. Re:hmmm... by Lord+of+Ironhand · · Score: 1
      [Mr Benny hands over iPod]

      Mugger: Oh, did I say your iPod or your life? Sorry, I meant your iPod and your life.

      (shamelessly stolen from Blackadder (I believe))

    5. Re:hmmm... by sakusha · · Score: 2, Funny

      It would probably go something more like this:

      Mugger: Your iPod our your life...

      Mr. Benny: What?

      Mugger: I SAID, your iPOD or your LIFE!

      Mr. Benny: WHAT??

      Mugger: Gimme that damn iPod!

      Mr. Benny: What?

    6. Re:hmmm... by hexdcml · · Score: 1

      don't you mean iLife? :P

      --
      Fight Crime - Shoot Back!
    7. Re:hmmm... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Mugger: "oh Did I say your iPod OR your life? I'm sorry, I meant your iPod AND your life!"

      Blantantly ripped of from Black Adder.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    8. Re:hmmm... by nucal · · Score: 1

      If it wasn't for cartoons no one around here would have heard of him ...

    9. Re:hmmm... by patman600 · · Score: 1

      shouldn't that be

      "your iPod or your iLife"

    10. Re:hmmm... by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      Mugger: I SAID, your I-POD or your LIFE!

      How about your iPod or your iLife?

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
  13. Help for the lonely among us by nizo · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now that we know this our social lives will improve, since getting mugged is better than no social life at all.

  14. aren't the units registered? by edrugtrader · · Score: 3, Insightful

    couldn't apple help with this? like register the unit's id, and everytime it tries to sync to i-Tunes, it checks a global database or something...

    --
    MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
    1. Re:aren't the units registered? by JeffTL · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but some people would call that an invasion of privacy. But yes, that'd be a good idea if it were optional...or if any data were only passed if you go to the Apple website and list your iPod as stolen. Result: more thieves go to prison, which is good because thieves usually do other things as well (murder, drug offenses, vandalism....all of these cause suffering and financial losses)

    2. Re:aren't the units registered? by sylencer · · Score: 1

      Yeah, like I'd like them to know how often and where (by IP-address) I sync my iPod. Welcome 1984...
      You can't solve a social problem with technology.

    3. Re:aren't the units registered? by genericacct · · Score: 1

      Seriously, they know all that anyway.

    4. Re:aren't the units registered? by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but, processors don't often get stolen due to their white headphones.

      I don't think....

    5. Re:aren't the units registered? by prozac79 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      everytime it tries to sync to i-Tunes, it checks a global database or something...

      So radio tags are bad because they track peoples' habits. Product activation is bad because it ties a product to a specific user. Global databases are bad because it's a violation of your privacy. However, when we are talking about your $300 iPod, then it's all good? You wouldn't mind having your device registered and activated and your usage tracked because Apple is the mighty and benevolent company? Now, if this was proposed in connection with a Microsoft product, how many "Big Brother" posts would we see?

      That's the sound of my karma dropping

      --
      "Oh dear, she's stuck in an infinite loop and he's an idiot" -Prof. Farnsworth (Futurama)
    6. Re:aren't the units registered? by shadowbearer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think the real point is that some people may want it, while many others don't.

      So build the capability into it, but don't turn it on by default. Let users know they can. Those who want it, will. Those who don't, won't.

      Let those paranoid enough have their choice, yet let those of us who don't want it have it completely disabled. Fair enough?

      (I hate the whole damned idea of tracking, too, but some people won't - or don't, at least with respect to stolen laptops, eh?)

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    7. Re:aren't the units registered? by negacao · · Score: 1

      Now, if this was proposed in connection with a Microsoft product, how many "Big Brother" posts would we see?

      Yeah, but we LIKE apple. :) C'mon, hypocrisy is fun...

      [mods: this is called sarcasm ]

    8. Re:aren't the units registered? by Jo+Owen · · Score: 1

      Uh.. So your relying on the fact that the kind guy who nicks the Ipod chooses to sync with the database?

    9. Re:aren't the units registered? by shadowbearer · · Score: 1


      Nah, actually I was speaking more broadly about "phone home" capabilities.

      You make a good point, but I really kind of doubt that most muggers are smart enough to realize the implications...unless, of course, they are unemployed and desperate IT workers *grin*

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    10. Re:aren't the units registered? by negacao · · Score: 1

      in business, survival != goodness.

  15. Re:So it looks like by morelife · · Score: 5, Funny


    Even muggers recognize that the higher price of Apple hardware goes into quality.


    Most muggers don't realize they'll be replacing that little battery for $99 in a couple weeks' time.

  16. Yeah, or the thief may have just asked... by bahwi · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Yeah, the white headphones do give it a way, but this paragraph is badly written!

    The thief then asked Baskerville if he was listening to an iPod and, receiving an affirmative answer, he "pulled a knife out and started waving it at me, saying: 'Well hand it over, then.' I gave it to him and he ran off. He must have known I was wearing an iPod because of the white headphones."

    1. Re:Yeah, or the thief may have just asked... by js3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      haha yea. you aren't safe if you wear blue headphones cause they are going to ask anyways and you trying to show off will tell them it IS an ipod

      --
      did you forget to take your meds?
    2. Re:Yeah, or the thief may have just asked... by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      Well... it's more dramatic if they actually appear somewhat clever.

      `Amm... do you have a nice expensive self-contained gadget that I can ran off with?'

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    3. Re:Yeah, or the thief may have just asked... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2, Funny

      "He must have known I was wearing an iPod because of the white headphones."

      Or... because you responded in the affirmative when he asked you if you were listening to an iPod?

      HOW ELSE COULD HE HAVE KNOWN?

    4. Re:Yeah, or the thief may have just asked... by Neil+Blender · · Score: 5, Funny

      I was robbed once. This guy asked me if that bulge in the back of my pants was a wallet. I said, "Why yes, it is." He then asked if it was full of money, to which I relied, "Loads."

  17. Punishment... DEATH by Squareball · · Score: 1, Funny

    I think that repeat theifs should be killed. They aren't stealing just property but really they are stealing a part of their victim's life. Say it takes me 30 hours to earn the money for the iPod, if I get mugged and they steal my iPod, they just stole 30 hours of my life. It's as if they tied me up for 30 hours. I just think that people who steal life from others should have their life taken away from them.

    1. Re:Punishment... DEATH by Neil+Blender · · Score: 5, Funny

      By your logic, you should be put to death. You just stole some of my life because I read your inane post.

    2. Re:Punishment... DEATH by MirgNave · · Score: 1

      DUDE! Do you really think that we should KILL someone because they steal iPods? That is quite a bit excessive. If you really want to "steal" their life, lock them up for a long time!

    3. Re:Punishment... DEATH by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think that repeat theifs should be killed. They aren't stealing just property but really they are stealing a part of their victim's life. Say it takes me 30 hours to earn the money for the iPod, if I get mugged and they steal my iPod, they just stole 30 hours of my life. It's as if they tied me up for 30 hours. I just think that people who steal life from others should have their life taken away from them.
      Dude, WTF? I suppose people who take too long in the fastfood line deciding what to order should be seriously maimed. After all, they are stealing 2-3 minutes of your life. It's as if they raped and tortured you for 2-3 minutes, right?

      Not saying that muggers aren't criminals and shouldn't be punished, but give me a break. I'm a Texan, and I find that a little harsh. ;)

    4. Re:Punishment... DEATH by Le+Marteau · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's as if they tied me up for 30 hours.

      Now, now, now, you were on to making a good point, and then you had to go get hysterical. No, it is not like they "tied you up for 30 hours." Yes, it sucks, but no, it is not false imprisonment.

      Plus, chances are, you didn't actually WORK those 30 hours, but merely 15, and spent the other 15 reading slashdot, which is actually theft from your employer, so maybe he should kill YOU!

      On second thought, why not just get it over with, and go for the gusto. Call it 'terrorism'.

      --
      Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
    5. Re:Punishment... DEATH by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      Well, if there was a way to kill someone for 30 hours, as punnishment, then I'm sure they would've done it already.

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    6. Re:Punishment... DEATH by JDBrechtel · · Score: 1

      Can you hear the "whooshing" sound?

    7. Re:Punishment... DEATH by DarkBlackFox · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's easy. Just alert the RIAA they stole your iPod without paying them license fees.

    8. Re:Punishment... DEATH by dickiedoodles · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think that repeat theifs should be killed. They aren't stealing just property but really they are stealing a part of their victim's life. Say it takes me 30 hours to earn the money for the iPod, if I get mugged and they steal my iPod, they just stole 30 hours of my life. It's as if they tied me up for 30 hours. I just think that people who steal life from others should have their life taken away from them.

      Well once they've stolen you're Ipod surely they've effectively got an illegal copy of thousands of RIAA protected songs and under a secret clause of the PIRATE act anyone under suspicion of violating intellectual property can be killed without trial so you might get your wish

      --
      In Soviet Russia Slashdot cliches use you
    9. Re:Punishment... DEATH by iminplaya · · Score: 1, Redundant

      But if you steal an iPod, is it theft or just infringement? :-)

      --
      What?
    10. Re:Punishment... DEATH by Big_Al_B · · Score: 1

      So 30 hours of your life is worth the entire remainder of another person's life? Yet you only earn about ten bucks an hour. Funny, that.

      Wouldn't it be more appropriate that someone who steals 30 hours of your life just be forced to listen to your babbling lunacy for another 30 hours? Eye for an eye, right?

    11. Re:Punishment... DEATH by Squareball · · Score: 1

      No sir, because I didn't force you at knife point to read this. You are choosing to do so.
      and for the record, I said repeat offenders.

    12. Re:Punishment... DEATH by commodoresloat · · Score: 5, Funny
      and for the record, I said repeat offenders.

      Well, you did just post again.

    13. Re:Punishment... DEATH by Voltronalpha · · Score: 1

      You have got to be kidding me, you must be a total fuckwad if you can't tell the difference between property and life. One is replaceable while the other is not.

      --
      There is evidence to prove both Democrats and Republicans are lying cocksuckers. Vote independently.
  18. The white headphones were genius... by Coryoth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Of all the nice design aspects of the iPod, as far as Apple are concerned those distinctive white headphones have to the best. Portable devices need to be small, discrete, and easy to slip into a pocket, so you never really see them. Is that person with the headphones on listening to a Rio player? iRiver perhaps? Maybe Neuros? Or just a discman stuck in their bag? But you know damn well when you see someone listening to an iPod.

    I'm surprised the others player manufacturers never cottoned on to this one: get the customers to do your advertising for you!

    Jedidiah.

    1. Re:The white headphones were genius... by sequential · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can always tell the Neuros users by their headphones. The headphones have the distinctive Neuros orange on the outside. It's a lot more discreet than all white, but it's noticable.

    2. Re:The white headphones were genius... by Coryoth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      True, others do a little, but it's the combination of bright white ear-pieces, along with bright white cord that makes the difference. It's easily visible from a distance.

      And you sell even better to the vain yuppie crowd, who like to make sure people can recognise the fact that they've bought the latest trendy gadget.

      Dear god people are suckers.

      Jedidiah.

    3. Re:The white headphones were genius... by idlemind · · Score: 1

      The new iPod adds just reinforce the whiteness of the head phones. A black silhouette of a person with a white cord hanging from their ears. How more obvious could it be.

    4. Re:The white headphones were genius... by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      There are many iPod look-alike headphones.

      Kind of ironic if someone gets mugged because they couldn't afford an ipod, but got look-alike headphones for their cd player.

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    5. Re:The white headphones were genius... by ostrich2 · · Score: 1
      get the customers to do your advertising for you!

      Yeah, last time I looked at my sneakers, I didn't see anything but...a huge f-ing nike insignia. Who cares, I muttered to myself, and got into my VW bus with a huge-f-ing-VW on the front and back. At least I still had my shirt with "My friend went to Cancun, and all I got was this lousy shirt" written on it.


      I think it's safe to say that EVERYONE knows to try to have your customers advertise for you. The question is what will catch on and become recognizable enough to be that advertisement. I think this is the entire argument behind buying name-brand merchandise.

    6. Re:The white headphones were genius... by mallardtheduck · · Score: 1

      Errm... Customers do most of the advertising already. They tell their friends how good any product is, they carry bags with shop names on, they wear branded clothes, branded bags, etc. I dont think we need to do any more advertising for them, do we?

    7. Re:The white headphones were genius... by Coryoth · · Score: 1

      Errm... Customers do most of the advertising already. They tell their friends how good any product is, they carry bags with shop names on, they wear branded clothes, branded bags, etc. I dont think we need to do any more advertising for them, do we?

      That was kind of my point - for most products this is the tried and true technique. Standard practice in fact. Yet Apple were the first to successfully apply it to portable players, and I think this was a large part of the iPods success.

      The only other manufacturer that took this road in any major way was Sony, and their fairly distinctive headphones that come with some of the more expensive discmans. For the most part there has been NO visible branding for portable players (okay, the discmans get by because they're big enough that people don't always have them hidden away, but the rest...)

      Jedidiah.

    8. Re:The white headphones were genius... by shrubya · · Score: 1
      I'm surprised the others player manufacturers never cottoned on to this one

      Bah. Other players might get distinctive headphone colors, but only the iPod can make its owner turn matte black and dance like a monkeyboy. Apple: the iNdisputable iNnovator of the iNformation age.

    9. Re:The white headphones were genius... by wibs · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Way back when I was the one of the few people to have an iPod, I was always very self concious when I pulled it out of my pocket. It's distinctive, but I don't want that kind of attention... I just want to listen to my music without feeling like some elitist rich snob. The problem was that even after I put my iPod back in my pocket, those damn white headphones were still trailing down over my customary black jacket... a little like the iPod advertisements these days. I couldn't stand it, and ended up buying new headphones. The new ones are great, incredible technical accomplishments that cost quite a bit more money, but without that distinctive white cord I feel like so much less of an elitist rich snob, and now the only people that give me a second look while wearing them are audiophiles.

      Nowadays the whole rich elitist snob thing doesn't apply, because every college kid has an iPod of his very own. I have some friends with iPods that never felt the way I did before, but now that the dangling white cords are everywhere they've bought new headphones because they feel like they're trend followers. I know all of this must sound terribly vain, but in my profession appearances are very important (yes, even while listening to music).

      My story doesn't seem to have much of a point, I know. I guess what it comes down to is that if I were to pick my least favorite facet of the iPod, the white headphone cord would definitely be it. I don't like being a walking billboard for anything, no matter hor subtle the advertisement.

      --
      If you get nervous, just remember that there are a few billion other people who don't really give a damn.
    10. Re:The white headphones were genius... by parkanoid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not quite sure how this works. You no longer feel like a rich slob because you're wearing $160 headphones instead of the free bundled pair?
      Don't get me wrong, I usually use a pair of Sennheisers with my mini (the headphones cost about as much as the iPod, heh), the sound is great, but how the hell do you feel more down to earth toting a pair of studio headphones?
      Now, the advertising/trend following aspect is a valid point, although most tradeshow shirt-clad geeks (myself included- I only use the sennheisers for sound quality and isolation) won't give it a second thought.

    11. Re:The white headphones were genius... by h00dLuM · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Also, when strolling solo through a high crime area, it's a bad idea to be wearing headphones in the first place, you've realy gotta be aware of what's around you.
      The folks who are likely to mug you recognise a very clear profile when you've got on particularly fancy gear, and a dude with an ipod also tends to broadcasts body language that they pick up like a homing beacon and they'll be circling like vultures in no time. On the other hand, I can't imagine anyone with money for an ipod in my humble hood so this must apply to muggings pulled by bored suburban mini-eminems.

    12. Re:The white headphones were genius... by Drakonian · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I sort of agree. I have an original 5 GB and felt like it attracted a lot of attention. I mostly stopped using the white headphones coz I didn't like them - uncomfortable and not the best sound. I bought some other more comfortable, better quality earbuds (Sennheiser MX400s) and have used them since.

      I have friends in a similar situation to yours. My friend originally shunned the iPod, saying he'd never pay that much money for a music toy. But now he's gave in and bought one (and totally loves it, of course). But he feels like such a trend follower that he won't wear the white headphones.

      --
      Random is the New Order.
    13. Re:The white headphones were genius... by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      In an updated version of American Psycho, Bateman would have an iPod, probably a number of them in different colours.

      A lot of people want them, people who've never before had a desire to have an MP3 type player before. I don't believe that it's just because they're a well designed, well made player.

    14. Re:The white headphones were genius... by kilf · · Score: 1

      I think the white headphones look a bit... Medical. They look functional rather than stylish, are highly visible, clean and attached to the person. Like a medical appliance, hearing aid or something.

      When I see a pair in use I look out for a white stick or a dog. Know what I mean?

    15. Re:The white headphones were genius... by Shai-kun · · Score: 1

      You're new here aren't you?

      --
      ...or so I've been told.
    16. Re:The white headphones were genius... by Shimmer · · Score: 1

      in my profession appearances are very important (yes, even while listening to music)

      Okay, I'll bite: What is your profession? I'm trying to picture a Slashdot reader-geek who has such an image-conscious profession... and failing.

      --
      The most rabid believers in American Exceptionalism are the exact same people whose policies are destroying it.
    17. Re:The white headphones were genius... by wibs · · Score: 1

      It's not the quality of headphones themselves that makes me feel weird, it's the way the white grabs people's attention. Lots of cheap headphones try to look like good ones, so having actually good headphones isn't anywhere near as distinctive.

      --
      If you get nervous, just remember that there are a few billion other people who don't really give a damn.
    18. Re:The white headphones were genius... by wibs · · Score: 1

      I'm a closet nerd, Slashdot like things are a big part of my personality. What I actually do is a mixed bag, but I do a lot of architectural design and client handling. Where the headphones come into play is while wandering around a site in the planning stages... I like to be alone, so I can get away with listening to music while I do it, but appearing professional is a must. I focus a lot on more natural building sites as well, and there's nothing more out of place than a guy in the woods with white headphones.

      Disclaimer... appearances are not the be-all and end-all of what I do. But when someone is paying you to design something, looking good yourself is a big confidence booster for the client. I guess that might sound vain, but I'm not... just a part of the job.

      --
      If you get nervous, just remember that there are a few billion other people who don't really give a damn.
  19. make sure you actually have the ipod... by mobiux · · Score: 3, Funny

    and aren't just wearing white earbuds to make yourself look cool.

    The mugger may get pissed and pop a cap in your ass when he find you only have an old walkman.

    1. Re:make sure you actually have the ipod... by tanguyr · · Score: 5, Funny

      The mugger may get pissed and pop a cap in your ass when he find you only have an old walkman.

      depends on what it's wrapped in

      --
      #!/usr/bin/english
    2. Re:make sure you actually have the ipod... by bennomatic · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Funny... I was thinking about this from another angle. If it's the cool factor that sells the iPods, I was thinking about auctioning off my white headphones on eBay...

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
  20. More FUD by Draoi · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Just more media hype

    Apple UK's wave of iPod advertising may be making the product a 'must-have' accessory for street criminals. It's also possible that UK journalists, disappointed at Apple's recent news that its much-anticipated iPod mini won't ship until July, now also have Apple in their sights - as was the case with the recent battery bad news stories.

    --
    Alison

    "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." - Albert Einstein

  21. hrm... by hot_Karls_bad_cavern · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This reminds me of what my mother used to say:

    Be careful of how hard you try to get attention, you may not garner the type you intended.

    1. Re:hrm... by gilgo_22 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Most of the people would agree that the Alhambra (in Granada, Spain) is one of the most beautiful buildings in the world... on the inside. On the outside is completely plain and boring.

      I was told it is like that, because muslims used to consider that showing off wealth was bad, because it incites other people to commit a sin. So, showing off makes you partially responsible for the other person lost soul.

      (I know: tourist guides are not reliable sources, but it still is a cool idea).

  22. Similar article in the The Times by tiger_omega · · Score: 1

    There is a similar piece over at The Times

  23. You can have my iPod when..... by laddhebert · · Score: 1
    You can have my iPod when you can pry it from my cold dead ears. *(#^&*(#*(#&

    As a distractive tactic, I will trick them all and get black headphones.

    -L

    --
    Don't Panic.
    1. Re:You can have my iPod when..... by squarefish · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've had my ipod since the 3rd generation came out about a year ago and I've been using black headphones for about 7 or 8 months- I foresaw it as an obvious downfall to wear white headphones at night in chicago if I keep the fscking thing. I still have it and no one is the wiser about I'm using for music anymore- it's none of their business.

      --
      Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.
  24. the mugger catches you alone and... by lotsofno · · Score: 4, Funny

    Mugger: so is that an ipod you got there mate?
    Guy: uh, yeah. ::mugger takes out knife::
    Mugger: alright, hand it over. ::mugger takes ipod and runs off:: ::mugger comes back::
    Mugger: uh, you haven't had this for 18 months or so by any chance?

  25. White headphones by Advan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't really understand the need to use the stock headphones anyway. Is using the white ones meant to be like a staus symbol? Sure they sound better than most earbuds that come with CD/MP3 players, but there are much better one's to be had, provided that you don't mind paying a little bit for them. In fact, I've yet to take the white ones out of package they came in.

    1. Re:White headphones by peeping_Thomist · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sure they sound better than most earbuds[...]I've yet to take the white ones out of package they came in.

      You listened to them while they were still in the package?

      --
      Anything worth doing is worth doing badly -- G.K. Chesterton
    2. Re:White headphones by RatBastard · · Score: 1

      I don't really like my white ones, actually. Sure, they sound pretty good, but they don't block noise at all. I have to crank my iPod all the way up to 11 just to hear my music over the thundering din of a snoring housecat.

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    3. Re:White headphones by rcs1000 · · Score: 1

      Thank goodness. Reading this thread I thought I was the only one who actually changed their Apple "buds" for decent headphones.

      Now - and this may sound a little like a troll - I LOATHE in-ear headphones. They are uncomfortable, they fall out, and (in my case at least) they get this funny red wax all over them. Hence, I have replaced mine with cheap Sony noice cancelling ones.

      (Which means, should anyone rey and mug me, I have an excuse for not hearing them. ;-))

      --
      --- My dad's political betting
    4. Re:White headphones by Blue+Master · · Score: 1

      I didn't like the shape of the white earbuds too much (they were uncomfortable to wear in the ear), but I wanted a set that was still possible to carry in my pocket, and that matched the i-pod.

      This is what I ended up with.

    5. Re:White headphones by Cyph · · Score: 1

      White earbuds actually are often considered a "status symbol", though the stock earbuds that are included with the iPod are not very good. There are better white alternatives though, and I know at least two iPod users who purchased those just to maintain their status as iPod users while enjoying decent sound quality. I really can't understand the reasoning behind this, as black earbuds offering the same level of sound quality can often be had for a much better price.

    6. Re:White headphones by swb · · Score: 1

      I thought the iPod phones (mine from a G3 20GB iPod) sucked rocks.

      I've been using mine either with my Koss PortaPro headphones or my Koss "The Plug" ear buds, depending on where I am and whether I'm wearing a hat or not.

      The Sennheiser buds I got with my Teac CD/MP3 player a couple of years ago sound better than the Apple buds, despite a lot of wear and tear.

      The Koss stuff seems to have a much higher sensitivity, which helps with the iPod's rather lame amplifier.

    7. Re:White headphones by djdavetrouble · · Score: 1

      Those little white headphones are crap, as are all earbuds. Get some real headphones with a 50 or 60 mm driver, and feel the bass. Sony studio monitors provide a decent listening experience on the low end of things. MDR-V600 or MDR-V700's are nice. the 700's are the trendy dj headphone of the moment, all silvery and stuff.

      --
      music lover since 1969
    8. Re:White headphones by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

      I agree, although I dont own an iPod, and have yet to check out the quality of the earbuds (which tend to fall out of my big ears anyway!); I've yet to buy a portable music player with stock headphones that did any justice to the hardware into which they are plugged.

      I have a pair of these which are pretty damn good.

      nick

      --
      Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
    9. Re:White headphones by Advan · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't go so far as to say that all earbuds are crap, but you do need to spend some green to get the good stuff. My Sony EX-71s sound really good and are only $50. They're noise isolating and put out a surprising amout of bass for 9mm drivers. You can spend upwards of $500 on a pair of studio quality Shure e5c's, too. That said, compared to a good set of over-the-ear cans, they really don't stand up. But then, I typically listen to my 'Pod in places other than my home and stowing a large pair of studio monitors is less than convenient.

    10. Re:White headphones by __aajqwr7439 · · Score: 1

      THANK YOU. Finally! My first thought on getting my iPod (a gift) wasn't Damn. People are going to immediately assume my white earphones are an affected attempt to display status!

      Please.

      xox,
      Dead Nancy

  26. muggings by zogger · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...sux. Had some street dude try to mug me before, downtown atlanta. Was getting off work, that day in the merchandise mart doing tradeshow set-up. Was tired and not in the mood to get mugged. This doofus walks up to me in the parking lot across the street as I was loading my tools back in the ride, waltzs right up and demands cash, Sez Mr. mugger wannabe -> "gimmee 20$" then some cursing. I stepped back, swung my vest open and started to draw my piece. Sez me ->" How 'bout 45 instead?"

    heh heh he took off running.

    Just an anecdotal story, doesn't mean much except to point out muggings happen everywhere,all around the whirrled, just sometimes they have a happy ending.

    There's an old saying I am fond of:

    "God made man - Then Colonel Colt made them equal"

    1. Re:muggings by prockcore · · Score: 2, Funny

      my favorite part of this story is when you were arrested for failing to have a CCW permit.

    2. Re:muggings by spood · · Score: 1

      You just made the case against rabid gun control.

      --
      ---- Just another spud server.
    3. Re:muggings by tiny69 · · Score: 1
      Concealed carry permits are easy to get in some states. It looks like it's easy to get one in Georgia.

      http://www.nraila.org/GunLaws/StateLaws.aspx?ST=GA

      --
      Go not unto/. for advice, for you will be told both yea and nay (but have nothing to do with the question)
    4. Re:muggings by jjhlk · · Score: 1

      Hypothetical story not told:

      Man taps your car's window with a 9mm.
      Being clever you pull out your bigger handgun to tap it on the window.
      Carjacker shoots you in the head and you die.

      Of course, since guns are going to exist anyway, and criminals will have them, maybe us non-criminals should too. But I'd rather pay insurance than risk my life.

    5. Re:muggings by erik_fredricks · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's why I moved north from Atlanta to Kennesaw a few years ago. I have MUCH less need of a sidearm now. Something to do with the local ordinance requiring gun ownership, I suppose.

      --

      THE GOOD HUMOR MAN CAN ONLY BE PUSHED SO FAR
      Bart Simpson on chalkboard in episode 2F18

    6. Re:muggings by spood · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, the grandparent is right on point, too. The problem is that there isn't an accurate mainstream picture being painted that describes how all of these issues weigh against each other.

      If you had to go on gut instinct and guess how many "family accidents" happen due to having guns in the house, you would be way off due to the media bias given to these horrible events. The actual percentage of these accidents when compared to all gun-related injuries and deaths is really quite low.

      Similarly, cases where concealed weapons have prevented crime are almost universally unreported. If you are an attempted mugging victim, but you don't have a concealed weapon permit, are you really going to call the police about it when you yourself are the only one likely to get in trouble?

      Our founding fathers agreed that the second amendment was not a provision for militia, but truly the right for American citizens to protect themselves. There are good arguments for Bill of Rights limitations (e.g. "fire" in a crowded theatre as a limitation of free speech), but the gun control lobby and the NRA are clouding the picture with noise.

      --
      ---- Just another spud server.
    7. Re:muggings by antirename · · Score: 1

      That's exactly true... I don't know anyone who bothers calling the police unless somebody's bleeding, and then it's only to get the ambulance and/or insurance adjuster there. You pull a gun, mugger runs off, I'd bet that 3 out of 4 go unreported (and that's being conservative).

    8. Re:muggings by spood · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's being very conservative. I have read an estimate that suggests as many as 200,000 incidents where guns have prevented a crime go unreported every year. Just an estimate, but mind-boggling nonetheless.

      --
      ---- Just another spud server.
    9. Re:muggings by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Hypothetical story not told:

      Man taps your car's window with a 9mm. Being clever you pull out your bigger handgun to tap it on the window. Carjacker shoots you in the head and you die.


      More likely hypothetical story:

      Man taps my car's window with a 9mm. Man lies on street with a gaping .45 wound to the head - if someone taps on the window with a gun like that, I consider it an immediate threat to my life and will respond by shooting him without warning. I would much prefer to be able to get out of the situation without violence, but I'm not going to give him the chance to hurt me if I can avoid it.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    10. Re:muggings by Bertie · · Score: 1

      For "estimate" read "pure finger-in-the-air guesswork", taking advantage of the fact that some people will accept just about anything. I mean, that stat's right up there with that nonsense about swallowing spiders in your sleep in terms of corroborating evidence, yet you parrot it because it ties in with your feelings on the matter. Who came up with this estimate, I wonder? It's a bit like far-right politicians claiming n illegal immigrants enter the country every year - how could anybody know? Yet people will believe them, because they want to.

    11. Re:muggings by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      You're right, of course, although you have to admit it'd be terribly risky to try pulling a gun while you have a gun aimed at your head.

    12. Re:muggings by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      Our founding fathers agreed that the second amendment was not a provision for militia, but truly the right for American citizens to protect themselves.

      "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." (in our Founding Fathers' own words -- what the Supreme Court may have felt later about the amendment may play better into your interpretation.)

      The purpose of the second amendment probably has a lot of reasons, but I'm not entirely sure how you reach your conclusion. The way I've always seen it presented is as a final check to avoid an oppressive government from being imposed -- if 80% of the people out there are angry and upset enough about the government to risk their lives fighting against it, that government will not be in place long, just as happened in the American Revolution.

    13. Re:muggings by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      You only need a concealed carry permit if the gun is concealed. You can carry a gun in the open without any legal problems (though I had one extremely pro-gun-rights professor once ask a police officer what she'd do if he walked around downtown with a loaded shotgun slung over his back and she said that she'd probably end up arresting him for disturbing the peace or something.)

    14. Re:muggings by raider_red · · Score: 1

      Of course, that's why you make it look like compliance for as long as possible. Make it look like you're taking off your seat belt while you're really drawing from your hip. Keep your body between yourself and the weapon for as long as you can, and pull the trigger as soon as the muzzle is pointed in the right direction.

      If they have a gun pointed at your head, you have just as much chance of getting shot, no matter what action you take. You might as well take the most decisive action possible. Remember, you only have the rest of your life to solve the problem.

      --
      It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
  27. So does this mean... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Putting a sticker that says "Don't mug people." on the headphones won't work?!?!?

  28. Wow, I never would have guessed... by CanadianMikey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The police should have issued this warning... Don't worry about flashing hundred dollar bills, or flashing your credit cards, or wearing flashy gold jewellery because it has become evident that muggers will only attack you if you have an Ipod.

    Wake up!!!

    My advice is don't talk to muggers

    1. Re:Wow, I never would have guessed... by prockcore · · Score: 1

      The police should have issued this warning... Don't worry about flashing hundred dollar bills, or flashing your credit cards, or wearing flashy gold jewellery because it has become evident that muggers will only attack you if you have an Ipod.

      True, muggers will mug anyone. But they'll target you if you advertise the fact that you have a lightweight, easy to steal piece of equipment which is guarranteed to fetch a few hundred dollars on ebay.

  29. Re:So it looks like by da3dAlus · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Most muggers don't realize they'll be replacing that little battery for $99 in a couple weeks' time."

    Then YOU apparently don't realize they'll just be mugging someone else in a couple weeks' time. Duh :)

    --

    Sometimes I doubt your commitment to Sparkle Motion.
  30. RIAA by The_Mystic_For_Real · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder if the RIAA will sue these muggers for stealing copyrighted music? Knowing the RIAA, they are more likely to sue the victims for distributing copyrighted material.

    --

    _____

    Thank you.

  31. Ditched them long ago.. by droopus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I bought my 5gb iPod the day Jobs announced them. My only complaint was the poor quality of the buds.

    Replaced them with Sony MDR-E888 the day after, which sound incredible.

    I bought my iPod because I love music, not as a "fashion accessory."

    --
    "The pie shall be cut in half and each man shall receive.....death. I'll eat the pie."
    1. Re:Ditched them long ago.. by BancBoy · · Score: 1

      Ditto! Haven't found an earbud that sound as good as the E-888s, particularly on the iPod.

      --
      [UID-HeinzIntel]
    2. Re:Ditched them long ago.. by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      My only complaint was the poor quality of the buds.

      Really, man. If you want good buds, you have to go to Oaxaca, at least.

      --
      What?
    3. Re:Ditched them long ago.. by Bertie · · Score: 1

      Sennheiser MX500.

      End of.

  32. Muggers beware by raider_red · · Score: 1

    I carry an iPod on my left, and a Sig-Sauer P239 on my right. Approach with caution.

    --
    It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
    1. Re:Muggers beware by raider_red · · Score: 1

      Unless your an Abortion doctor I can think of little reason to carry a gun in the civilian field.

      I'm not inclined to let your lack of imagination limit my self-defense options. Bad things happen, and I like to be prepared.

      --
      It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
    2. Re:Muggers beware by Roman_(ajvvs) · · Score: 1

      You'd better hope you don't switch tracks with the wrong hand...

      --
      click-clack, front and back. I'm not moving this car otherwise.
    3. Re:Muggers beware by raider_red · · Score: 1

      LOL. That's almost the standard joke for the CHL safety classes: "Make sure you answer the cel-phone and not the pistol!"

      --
      It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
    4. Re:Muggers beware by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      I'm not inclined to let your lack of imagination limit my self-defense options

      [applause]

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  33. Turn the tables by felonious · · Score: 3, Funny

    Use the headphones but plug them into an old, big-ass, tape deck that's playing "Wham" (George Michael) on it. Realizing what's going on the mugger should shit his/her pants and run for his/her life...

    --
    You aren't free to do anything, until you've lost everything.
    1. Re:Turn the tables by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Use the headphones but plug them into an old, big-ass, tape deck that's playing "Wham"

      I think I'd rather be mugged at gunpoint.

  34. Re:won't help much by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

    Isn't it sad for those who wear iPod look-alike headphones and get mugged for it...

    --

    "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

  35. Downside of portable electronics by borkus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As much as MP3 jukeboxes and digital cameras keep getting smaller, they keep becoming better targets for thieves. Someone walking down the street with a 20 GB iPod, a Palm Tungsten C and a Minolta dImage is carrying about $1000 (US) in potential swag. That makes a car stereo system look like chump change. Sure, the fence would have to sell the items without accessories, but you can usually get those for a fraction of the cost of the item.

    1. Re:Downside of portable electronics by AmigaAvenger · · Score: 1

      car stereo's are still a good target. MUCH higher dollar value (I compete for SQ with mine, around $5000 in total investement, but $10,000 is quite common), and no witnesses, assuming no one is around when it takes place.

    2. Re:Downside of portable electronics by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      I imagine that car stereo are indeed a good target. I don't honestly know how common it is to have units in the $5000 bracket... with the exception of some audio geeks that I know. Most people I know either have factory radios, or buy the sub $200 models at the local shop if they bought a base model. Not that I'd be able to spot a multi grand car stereo just by looking in a car window... just most random stereos I tend to see in cars are factory.

      I don't know how long it takes to jack a car stereo exactly, but one has to gain entry, remove the dash stuff, unscrew, and remove. I guess this can be done in under 120seconds or so if a person is willing to break the dash parts. Now that I know my dash, I imagine I could remove my stereo in under 5min.

      A hip mounted Ipod can be grabbed from a casual passer by. It can fit in the thief's pocket and they can walk around without being paranoid about someone seeing them with the hot goods. The target market would be greater with a portable player, car stereos are usually bought by people with cars.

      While I can see the car stereo being more attractive in many ways... I think it is easier to spot an Ipod or portable player in a crowd. It requires less of a backround in audio eqiupment to make a valued judgement whether it's worth your time or not.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    3. Re:Downside of portable electronics by wes33 · · Score: 1

      > and no witnesses, assuming no one is around when it takes place.

      no witnesses for the ipod theft either, once muggers get fully into 21century, GTA, crime mode

    4. Re:Downside of portable electronics by pi_rules · · Score: 1
      Someone walking down the street with a 20 GB iPod, a Palm Tungsten C and a Minolta dImage is carrying about $1000 (US) in potential swag.


      If you're carrying $1,000 in nifty gizmos that are prime targets for criminals it wouldn't be such a bad idea to invester $300-$500 more dollars and get yourself a good sidearm. You rarely (as in I've never) heard of somebody's Glock being taken off their belt and stolen!
    5. Re:Downside of portable electronics by JamieF · · Score: 1

      Stealing something out of a car is easier because the car is just sitting there (maybe with an alarm sounding) and you can take the radio using regular old tools.

      Mugging someone requires a weapon (unless you are really physically intimidating) and that you look like you could chase that person down if they ran. (I assume that threatening someone with a deadly weapon carries a larger sentence than stealing a $100 car stereo.) A grab-and-run theft requires that the person be holding the object in a snatchable place (not in their pocket) and that you could get away from them and anyone that might try to stop your escape.

      My car was broken into three times in the last few years and yet I've never been mugged or even felt threatened by someone on the street.

    6. Re:Downside of portable electronics by JamieF · · Score: 1

      ...because muggers always ask for your digital camera, your PDA, and your MP3 player.

      "Hold still, I'm going to pat you down and then use the wand to find any other electronic valuables on your person. Don't try to hit me and escape or anything."

      An alternative to carrying a firearm everywhere is to just keep stuff concealed.

    7. Re:Downside of portable electronics by everdave · · Score: 1

      that is always my complaint when buying stolen goods - lack of accessories!

      --
      Elliott Smith Tribute CD available now on Double D Records! Visit www.doubledrecords.com to order.
    8. Re:Downside of portable electronics by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Mugging someone requires a weapon (unless you are really physically intimidating) and that you look like you could chase that person down if they ran. (I assume that threatening someone with a deadly weapon carries a larger sentence than stealing a $100 car stereo.) A grab-and-run theft requires that the person be holding the object in a snatchable place (not in their pocket) and that you could get away from them and anyone that might try to stop your escape.

      I was thinking of the classic bump and theft actually. Bump into a person, while they are stunned, take their crap, say pardon me and move on.

      I have to say I've never had my pocket picked. I've had my car broken into, only when I've neglected to lock it, and never had my stereo stolen... only my cassette tapes.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    9. Re:Downside of portable electronics by JamieF · · Score: 2, Funny

      >I was thinking of the classic bump and theft actually. Bump into a person, while they are stunned, take their crap, say pardon me and move on.

      Don't you think they'd notice that the music had suddenly stopped at exactly the same time that you bumped into them?

      "What iPod? Oh, this one in my hand? No, no, this one is mine. Uh, yeah, I always carry it around without any headphones. Yours is, um, back there on the sidewalk somewhere, I think."

  36. Without a Doubt this Topic will Burn Through... by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Without a doubt this topic is going to set a record for burning through Funny mod points.

    Now will someone please mod me Insightful.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Without a Doubt this Topic will Burn Through... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Without a doubt this topic is going to set a record for burning through Funny mod points.

      Gimmee your mod-points or I'll outsource your ass. NOW!

    2. Re:Without a Doubt this Topic will Burn Through... by spood · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wow, all you have to do to get Insightful mods is ask for them? Don't forget to say please.

      Now will someone please mode me Funny.

      --
      ---- Just another spud server.
  37. to hell with the ipod... by mantera · · Score: 1


    I guess some would have little sympathy for the fashion conscious ipod-o-philes... but my ipaq!!! i don't want anyone stealing my ipaq; and i guess i'm gonna have to think twice about using it in public now. Damn muggers, they should be roasted in hell.

  38. Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I really wonder how they steal it from you WHILE you are wearing the headphones and listening to it and not be aware when the sound's gone... :-)

  39. Self Defense by JewFish · · Score: 1

    I proudly wear my iPod white earbuds everyday, and the thought of getting mugged has never crossed mind. My since of security lies in two areas.

    1. I live in the US, muggings (and sack beatings) are quite low in the are which I live. Now in the UK, where I assume "West Midlands" is, muggings are much more common than in the USA.

    2. I carry a concelead handgun. Should someone attempt to mug me they would be quite sorry.

  40. However by BoomerSooner · · Score: 1

    Your life is a depreciable asset, kind of like computer equipment. My first portable CD player was $250 by Sony, you can get them for $19.95 now. As you grow older the time you have left is shrinking. So to you it becomes more valuable, but to others you're almost worthless because your time left is approaching zero. I'm for graded sentencing based on the age of the victim. If you kill a 90 year old man, is he really missing much? However if you kill a 5 year old, they are missing a lot (you'd of course need to use the actuarial tables to value a humans life properly).

    BTW, I'm kiddin'

  41. Not obvious to all by wondafucka · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I know a lot of naive iPod owners that never even thought of this. I would never go outside (Chicago)with the white earbuds unless I was on my bike. There are pleny of really good earbud/in ear headphones that don't stick out. The remote is a different story. I was thinking about painting mine black somehow. It sure beats having a brick thrown at the back of your head. At least the guy in the article got away safely.

    All I have to say is, have fun circumventing the serial number protection. Someone buying a stolen iPod is in for a suprise.

  42. Your kidding... by SteveXE · · Score: 1

    "There are guys who'd rather be robbed than change the colour of the headphones." If i was them i would just change the damn headphones, what kinda guy would care so much about the color of his headphone cord...? Id say something funny but it wouldnt be very tastefull so just pretend i said something funny if anyone asks.

  43. Great! by bobcat · · Score: 1

    Now I get to use the money I saved by buying a mini-Ipod and use it on a .357 magnum.

    Actually, that's not so bad now that I think of it...

    --
    -- Ziggy Sig Sig
    1. Re:Great! by WebMasterJoe · · Score: 1
      Now I get to use the money I saved by buying a mini-Ipod and use it on a .357 magnum.
      And, you can shoot the next guy who asks why you didn't shell out $50 more to 15 GB instead of just 4!
      --
      I really hate signatures, but go to my website.
  44. Solution... by OrangeTide · · Score: 1
    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:Solution... by bogie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yea great solution. Killing someone to protect to a $300 piece of silicon is a great idea. Really worth it. Why don't we add rocket launchers to our cars so we can blow up anyone who cuts us off while we are at it.

      --
      If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    2. Re:Solution... by radish · · Score: 1

      Excellent. Because having the streets filled with gun toting wannabe heros is the perfect way to improve safety on the streets.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    3. Re:Solution... by valkraider · · Score: 1

      That would probably cut down on the number of people cutting others off, wouldn't it? It would take only a couple before people started figuring it out... After that, only the stupid people would get blown up... Crime rates are lowest where *legal* gun ownership is highest. People are much less attractive targets when they can shoot back...

    4. Re:Solution... by necrognome · · Score: 1
      Why don't we add rocket launchers to our cars so we can blow up anyone who cuts us off while we are at it.


      That would actually be pretty cool. Can I put them on my rocket car?
      --


      Let's get drunk and delete production data!
    5. Re:Solution... by negacao · · Score: 1

      Why don't we add rocket launchers to our cars so we can blow up anyone who cuts us off while we are at it.

      How much do you charge to install it? Is 1000$ ok? How soon can you do it? ;)

    6. Re:Solution... by pi_rules · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Yea great solution. Killing someone to protect to a $300 piece of silicon is a great idea. Really worth it. Why don't we add rocket launchers to our cars so we can blow up anyone who cuts us off while we are at it.


      I'm the last person to promote use of lethal force for protection of property. However, you're not understanding the nature behind the argument I feel.

      A mugging is a violent act. In normal thinking parts of this world (IMHO) it's prefectly legal to respond to a lethal threat of violence with lethal force.

      If I walk up to you, 10 feet away, and demand that you tell me you like me while pulling a gun on you to insure compliance I have put your life in danger. The level of my demands does not in any way, shape, or form effect the perceived threat level to your own person. It shouldn't at least. I don't care if somebody demands a stick of gum or my car -- if they pull a weapon my life is in danger and I not only have the natural right, but often the legal right, to respond with deadly force to neutralize the threat.

      The wording of your reponse, "Killing someone to protect", just screams to me that you do not have any background in such areas. You do not shoot to kill, ever, you shoot to stop. A very small caliber round will kill a human being if given enough time. That is not the goal. The goal is to deliver a massive amount of trauma to their body to immediately stop all action on their part. That does not mean that you're trying to kill them. People shoot center of mass not because it's deadly, but because it's likely to stop the person. A shot to the upper thigh (if you hit a major artery) is horribly fatal despite what you see in the movies, however it's unlikely to IMMEDIATELY stop the attacker. Stopping is the goal, not killing.

      I wouldn't shoot somebody over $300 dollars. I wouldn't shoot sommebody for any sum of money. The whole situation turns though once the perp presents the threat of deadly force.
    7. Re:Solution... by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      People shoot center of mass not because it's deadly, but because it's likely to stop the person

      And also because it's a much larger target, and thus much easier to hit - any hit is better than a miss in those circumstances. Once the adrenaline starts, the fine motor skills go to hell, so you can't really count on being as precise as you'd like.

      You make a good point, and one that most people seem to overlook a lot - the idea is not to kill, but to incapacitate. A lot of people will stop whatever it is they're doing upon the first hit regardless of the actual injury inflicted, simply to avoid being shot again. Psychological incapacitation is just as valid as physical incapacitation, since the idea is to get them to stop whatever they're doing *now*. Often the simple act of having a firearm drawn on them is enough to accomplish this, though it would be foolish to rely on it.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    8. Re:Solution... by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      ding ding ding. and someone gets it.

      I've never met a polite mugger. Usually you get kicked, punched or stab. If it's a nice mugger they stab you first then take your stuff. If he's a real jerk he asks you for your stuff, you give it to him and then he stabs you.

      Of course in some crazy states, like California. If you shot someone to stop them from killing you. And they recieved nerve damage from it. Maybe a slight tingling for the rest of their lives or perhaps even paralysis. Then they would collect disability and use all their free time to sue you. And about half the time they win (not good odds for you). If you shoot them dead, then there is less legal hassle. You only have to worry about the person's family coming after you and in civil court you generally can't get as much out of such a case. Of course there is always dealing with the manslaughter legal fiasco, even if it was self defense. But usually you can get that taken care of.

      The question we must ask ourselves is this. Should we just hand over our iPods, wallets and sneakers to a mugger. And perhaps give him a few words of encouragement to go do the same to our neighbors. Or is there anything at all that we can do? (such as whine on slashdot about it, donate lots of money to our local police department, start a crime watch group, carry a gun/knife/bat/hammer/mace/pepperspray)

      btw- there are a lot of people that would shoot anyone of us for $300 easy. Sadly $300 buys a lot of crack. Even if that crack won't last more than a day or two. (not that a stolen ipod goes for more than maybe $50, tops)

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    9. Re:Solution... by MarkCollette · · Score: 1

      Damn, where can I get a cheap $50 iPod?

      And would I have to worry about them mugging me?

    10. Re:Solution... by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      You don't kill somebody for a $300 toy.
      You kill somebody because he is a bad person. He isn't really a bad person until he comes up and identifies himself as a bad person by trying to mug you for your $300 toy.

      Concealed carry classes suggest that if you are going to carry, be prepared to be proactive and think through these sort of things. iPod-jacker demands your 'pod, you take it off your belt and toss it on the ground between you and him. When it reaches for it you pull out your gun and you start pulling the trigger until he stops moving. Try not to get blood on your 'pod in the process.

      It's really pretty simple. And very effective.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
  45. Attention Citizens: by scout.finch · · Score: 1

    Please be afraid.

    That is all.

    I mean, honestly.

  46. Fun by wowbagger · · Score: 5, Funny

    One fake iPod case: $50.
    One receiver: $50
    One transmitter: $50
    One kilo C4: $150

    One mugger exploding when he runs more than 50 feet away from you: Priceless.

    1. Re:Fun by lrucker · · Score: 5, Funny
      What happens if you walk too close to malfunctioning Cell tower, putting out the trigger frequency.

      You get a Darwin Award.

    2. Re:Fun by PlazMan · · Score: 1

      You exploding when the batteries in your transmitter wear out: pretty damn funny.

    3. Re:Fun by danila · · Score: 1

      I don't know how you would design the explosive device, but I would not have the explosion triggered automatically. I think requiring me to enter a code on the transmitter would be much safer.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    4. Re:Fun by pvera · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't think you want to blow one kilo of C4 from 50 feet away!

      --
      Pedro
      ----
      The Insomniac Coder
    5. Re:Fun by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      Extras->Booby Trap->Time to Detonation->(10sec|15sec|20sec)

    6. Re:Fun by theTerribleRobbo · · Score: 1

      > One kilo C4: $150

      Arrested as a terrorist and sent to Guantanamo Bay: Priceless.

    7. Re:Fun by Drakonian · · Score: 1

      How do I apply for this prestegious award?

      --
      Random is the New Order.
    8. Re:Fun by dunedan · · Score: 1

      the whole point of the 50 feet thing was that when the reciever STOPS reciveing the signal your transmiter puts out it blows unless disamred

      I'm guessing anyway. Extra noise wouldn't matter.

    9. Re:Fun by X86Daddy · · Score: 1

      You forgot:

      some nails and broken glass $1

  47. markup for the headphones by mandalayx · · Score: 1

    I actually ended up losing my white headphones, my precious. Imagine my surprise when I walked into the Apple store and they wanted $40 for a replacement pair.

    I quickly ran out. They didn't even sell the basic version...

  48. Entrepreneurs anyone??? by adzoox · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I think this has been a long time coming especially because of the "iPod frenzy" on eBay - but someone should create a website that registers serial numbers for iPods. An eBay and Yahoo auction database should check against this database for stolen iPods before the sale can complete.

    Technically I think this would be a neat feature Apple could integrate into .Mac for all it's products.

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
    1. Re:Entrepreneurs anyone??? by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Why not just use the usenet? With goggle's cache, the newsgroups can be searched for serial numbers with ease.

      An entrepreneur could follow the procedure to creating a news group, and offer an easy web based engine for post and search via google.

      or

      A casual person could already post "Ipod xxxx-xxxx stolen"

      As a person who finds and tries to return lost items, I have actually found a person via a newsgroup cache.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  49. New iPod accessory? by AragornSonOfArathorn · · Score: 2, Funny

    This opens up the market for 3rd-party iPod cases with exploding dye packs, like banks use when they get robbed. Good luck trying to sell a bright-pink-stained iPod! ;)

    --
    sudo eat my shorts
    1. Re:New iPod accessory? by adzoox · · Score: 1
      "Good luck trying to sell a bright-pink-stained iPod! ;)"

      Stain it what color? You mean turn an iPod into this

      --
      Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
    2. Re:New iPod accessory? by jkubecki · · Score: 1

      You mean bright Pink isn't already an option? I think if you REALLY want to make an Apple product unsellable, just have the dye pack gray or silver...

    3. Re:New iPod accessory? by radish · · Score: 1

      Pink? My girlfriend would buy it in an instant...in fact the only reason she's buying a mini is because the white is "boring". Me? I prefer my Rio. Nice discreet (black) Sennheiser earbuds.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  50. Target my headphones? by jhylkema · · Score: 1

    I target you with Mr. Oleoresin or Mr. Glock.

  51. RIAA Will Sue the muggers ... by lorenc · · Score: 5, Funny

    for stealing mp3's ....

    1. Re:RIAA Will Sue the muggers ... by droopus · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that more be like "receiving stolen goods?"

      I watch too much Law and Order methinks. B)

      --
      "The pie shall be cut in half and each man shall receive.....death. I'll eat the pie."
    2. Re:RIAA Will Sue the muggers ... by Grail · · Score: 1

      No - the RIAA would go for the obvious target, this of course being the victim. After all, the victim was the one who (illegally) ripped the MP3 from CDs and (illegally) stored it on the iPod. Thus in the process of getting mugged and voluntarily handing over the iPod, the victim was illegally sharing intellectual property.

      So if you do get mugged for your iPod, don't let the RIAA get hold of your email or IP address!

  52. Crappy earphones by slippy51 · · Score: 1

    Who actually uses the crappy earphones that comes with a product? I always find I have to go out and get a better pair.

  53. Re:standardize by morcheeba · · Score: 3, Insightful

    you're blaming the company?!

    first you should blame the muggers.

    then maybe you should blame people who have flashy things in questionable surroundings.

    *last* should be the company. Are you going to blame every luxury product manufacturer? And then every manufacturer of anything of value? "Apparently McDonalds would rather see their customers mugged than produce Big Macs made out of radioactive dirt? (because someone might try to steal clean dirt)"

  54. MOD PARENT UP. HEALTHY COUNTERPOINT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The Telegraph claims iPod Web sites have received "numerous reports" claiming users have been targeted by such criminals. Macworld has even received phone calls in recent days, including from the BBC and ITV asking if we are aware of any such incidents. We are not. In the end the BBC dropped its planned report as it could find no one to back-up the story.

  55. Just make sure not to mug this woman by j1ggl3x · · Score: 4, Funny
  56. "they just stole 30 hours of my life" by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 1

    "As you know, the concept of the suction pump is centuries old. And really, that's all this is, except that instead of sucking water, I'm sucking life. I've just sucked one year of your life away. I might one day go as high as five, but I really don't know what that would do to you, so let's just start with what we have."
    - Count Rugen, "The Princess Bride"

    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
  57. Dear Hambone by Letter · · Score: 4, Funny
    Dear Hambone,

    This is a Slash-mugging! Close your browser and give me your laptop!

    Now!
    Letter

  58. This is stealing! by Lord+of+Ironhand · · Score: 4, Funny
    Do these people even realize that taking someone's iPod is stealing? Would you illegally download music from the internet? No? Then why don't you stop stealing(!) iPods?

    Oops, nevermind...

    Though I'm sure there's a Soviet Russia post to be made out of this...

    1. Re:This is stealing! by xenoandroid · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Though I'm sure there's a Soviet Russia post to be made out of this..."

      In Soviet Russia, the iPod steals you!
      In Soviet Russia, the music illegally downloads you!

    2. Re:This is stealing! by lxs · · Score: 1

      Dammit! don't call it stealing! It's physical property rights infringement.

  59. Police Intelligence...err... by thrillbert · · Score: 4, Funny
    Obviously it is easier for the police to "give a stern warning" than to use this new "bees to honey" approach at getting more crooks off the streets.

    Scenario:

    • 1) Send undercover officer wearing white headphones walking down street.
    • 2) Crook aproaches with knife, pull out gun from pocket where iPod is supposed to be and introduces himself.
    • 3) Profit!!


    ---
    Frankfort, Kentucky, makes it against the law to shoot off a policeman's tie.
    1. Re:Police Intelligence...err... by xenoandroid · · Score: 1

      Change this to:

      1) Send undercover officer wearing white headphones walking own the street

      2) Crook approaches with gun, start pulling out gun where iPod is suppose to be.

      3) Get shot.

    2. Re:Police Intelligence...err... by foldedspace · · Score: 1

      How about giving the policemen/women BACKUP and BULLETPROOF VESTS? It's like their job or something?

      It is absurd for the police to ask people to wear different colored headphones. If the crime against iPod owners is that high, the police should be keeping their mouths shut and running a massive amount of stings. Potential thieves should be more concerned that the guy with the white headphones is being watched by two patrol cars and a squad on foot around the corner.

    3. Re:Police Intelligence...err... by xenoandroid · · Score: 1

      Bullet proof vest on the head? Also at point blank a bulletproof vest won't do much to keep the officer from being unable to fight back even if it would have otherwise saved his life (close range shots can still break through).

      As for backup, that won't do much good if the thief might change it into a hostage situation.

      Either way it's a stupid idea to take that many risks just to get a petty thief.

    4. Re:Police Intelligence...err... by The_Mr_Flibble · · Score: 1

      In England the police Mug you.

    5. Re:Police Intelligence...err... by isorox · · Score: 2, Informative

      Erm, the police don't carry guns in the UK, the only people with guns are a few armed police and criminals. Oh and you never see the police on teh street, they're too busy filling in forms and re-filling speed cameras. I walk 5 miles to and from work every day, quite late at night. There were several thousand football fans drinking cans of beer on the way last night, not a single policeman in sight.

  60. Get some headphones by zakezuke · · Score: 4, Funny

    I want to get an Ipod and use my old pair of big ass 70s style radio shack headphones. big and bulky with the 1/4 inch jack and cover up your entire ears.

    http://www.radioshack.com/product.asp?catalog%5F na me=CTLG&category%5Fname=CTLG%5F007%5F003%5F004%5F0 00&product%5Fid=33%2D1176

    While they can be spotted at a distance, a mugger might thing I have a portable 8-track and not steal from me.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    1. Re:Get some headphones by diggitzz · · Score: 1

      While they can be spotted at a distance, a mugger might thing I have a portable 8-track and not steal from me.

      ... only because a portable 8-track would weigh like 25 pounds and you'd be one tough mofo to be just strolling down the street with one in your ... hmm, can't figure out how you'd carry that inconspicuously ...

      So the second conclusion would be that you have something expensive to hide (like a really cool magic bag) thus making you a good target. ;)

      --
      -=[You cannot consistently judge this statement to be true.]=-
    2. Re:Get some headphones by nomadic · · Score: 1

      big and bulky with the 1/4 inch jack and cover up your entire ears.

      The muggers might leave alone, but you'll need a stick to fend off all the women coming on to you.

    3. Re:Get some headphones by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      ... only because a portable 8-track would weigh like 25 pounds and you'd be one tough mofo to be just strolling down the street with one in your ... hmm, can't figure out how you'd carry that inconspicuously ...

      They have made portable 8-track players

      http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&it em =3087170429&category=14999
      http://cgi.ebay.com/ws /eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item =3087605049&category=14999#ebayphotohosting

      None as small as an 8-pod, but not 25pounds. Portable enough to take to the beach... probally a little bit bulky to go running with.

      So the second conclusion would be that you have something expensive to hide

      That is possible... I know people who record nature sounds often prefer full headphones rather then earphones. There are also beach combers who have full headphones on their metal detectors, who seem to get asked if they have 8-track players.

      I imagine in reality it's potluck if you decide to steal something from someone with big ass headphones.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  61. I don't wear the damn earbuds.... by AvantLegion · · Score: 1
    ... but I do wear my iPod on a belt clip often.

    I'm also a big guy. A punk mugger is going to be a pavement stain if he reaches for my little white music box.

  62. Maybe the scrollwheel... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

    ...could be adapted to identify fingerprints making the iPod useless to anyone who stole it. Hmmm...then again this just might result in a black market trade in iPods with fingers.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    1. Re:Maybe the scrollwheel... by xenoandroid · · Score: 1

      That would also make the already high price go up even more, just to make the mugger's life slightly more difficult (you still lose the iPod which has a hackable security system).

  63. A good way to supplement a $400 ipod... by defile · · Score: 1

    ...is with a $400 pistol.

    I hope this is what the police mean by "paying the price".

  64. White headphones suck by LS · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I never take the iPod out because I feel like an asshole for wearing the white headphones. I feel like I'm advertising for apple and showing off my expensive nerd toy. I've been planning to get new headphones, and this is another good reason to get a pair.

    LS

    --
    There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    1. Re:White headphones suck by gabbarbhai · · Score: 1

      Hey, who are you calling a nerd toy? Oops! There goes my Karma..

  65. Re:standardize by John+Starks · · Score: 1

    Are you really blaming Apple for the muggings? Why don't we just blame Mercedes-Benz for car theft? Or Rolex for muggings involving stolen watches? It's not Apple's fault that people are flashing expensive looking equipment in bad parts of town. Buy some cheap looking headphones if you want to go to bad neighborhoods.

  66. you know the story... by blackmonday · · Score: 4, Funny

    As soon as the mugger steals one, a newer cheaper iPod comes out for mugging the next week. The vicious cycle repeats infinitely.

  67. Doesn't really matter to me... by n()_cHIEFz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...I carry an iPod and also an H&K USP .40, fuck with my iPod and you're going to have some extra holes in your ass. Oh, sorry, I forgot you can't own guns like that in England, my bad :-/

    --
    -- Is it a right to remain ignorant? -- Calvin
    1. Re:Doesn't really matter to me... by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      I got one word for ya..

      Convergence.

      (me want a Glock 32C with 256MB MP3 playback ;)

    2. Re:Doesn't really matter to me... by n()_cHIEFz · · Score: 1

      Ahhh... one can only dream of such cool toys!

      --
      -- Is it a right to remain ignorant? -- Calvin
    3. Re:Doesn't really matter to me... by Bombcar · · Score: 1

      How about an AK-47 clip with an MP3 player?

      Here

    4. Re:Doesn't really matter to me... by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      You probably don't want the C for self-defense - the compensated models are great for matches, but tend to blind you pretty badly for a while in dark environments. :-)

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    5. Re:Doesn't really matter to me... by n()_cHIEFz · · Score: 1
      And maybe some in your child or spouse by accident too, you dumbass nerd, trying to feel macho about your pathetic self by owning a firearm.
      No, actually, I own firearms mostly because I hunt. I also own a few because there are scumbag criminals out there who would hurt my wife and children. And, god forbid I ever have to use a weapon in defense, I'm comfortable enough and trained enough to NOT shoot an innocent person. It has nothing to do with my self opinion. Besides, you're the one who posted Anonymous Coward, not me.
      --
      -- Is it a right to remain ignorant? -- Calvin
    6. Re:Doesn't really matter to me... by stimpy1306 · · Score: 1

      LOL same here I walk with head up and eyes out...singing along...IPOD on one hip and USP var 2 9mm on the other...if you are a mugger good luck

    7. Re:Doesn't really matter to me... by nordicfrost · · Score: 1

      >fuck with my iPod and you're going to have some extra holes in your ass.

      For your sake, I really, really hope that your mugger is unarmed (In England, if they carry anything at all, they carry knives. Guns are a rarity). And if he's armed, I hope that he or she draw slower than you. But that is irrelevant becaus if they a) have a gun and b) mug you, the gun is already probably drawn. And that is bad for you.

      And, BTW, the USP sucks ass. Men use the Desert Eagle Mark XIX. Although my 970 hours of gun training was with Glock 17 and 19...

    8. Re:Doesn't really matter to me... by jdowland · · Score: 1

      You are by far the best example I've come across in a long while, of why guns should remain banned in england.

      And please if you are planning a holiday ('vacation'); look elsewhere than our humble country.

    9. Re:Doesn't really matter to me... by n()_cHIEFz · · Score: 1
      Desert Eagle Mark XIX

      Yea, they're nice guns, a bit large and really expensive (really there's no comparison to a USP or a Glock there). I've owned a Glock 17 and would take my USP over it any day of the week.

      If I was to run into a mugger, I would most likely give up the iPod as I only have a 10GB (I know, Men like you carry the 40GB) and try to keep from getting my USP stolen ;-)
      --
      -- Is it a right to remain ignorant? -- Calvin
    10. Re:Doesn't really matter to me... by n()_cHIEFz · · Score: 1
      You are by far the best example I've come across in a long while, of why guns should remain banned in england.


      And you are the best example I have seen in a while of why they should teach English grammar to people who live in England.

      I've been to you're humble country. It was nice but I must say I prefer Ireland, the people are much friendlier and a hell of a lot more fun (the pubs are great).

      And don't worry; I won't be returning to your oh so humble country if I can help it.
      --
      -- Is it a right to remain ignorant? -- Calvin
    11. Re:Doesn't really matter to me... by n()_cHIEFz · · Score: 1

      You're not a troll you have good points. It's not a comforting fact that your average citizen can walk into a store and walk out with a handgun and ammo (assuming they don't have a criminal record) with no real training on the use of the weapon.

      However, there are things you do every day, driving a car for instance, that you take for granted. Driving a 3500lb car around in a reckless manner and endangering the lives of others on the road is tantamount to waving a loaded gun around, IMHO. You have bad days when you drive, and you have to make split second decisions when you're driving that can have a serious impact on more than a few people. Again, most people take this for granted. Given cars aren't designed as weapons, but they could be, and extremely destructive ones at that.

      So to answer your question, yes, I do think about these things. In another reply in this thread, I said basically the same thing; you always have to consider the consequences of your actions. If I pack a weapon, be it a knife, gun, or even my fists, I try to be as rational in my responses to situations as I can be, but I am human and so is everyone else who carries a weapon. A great example of what you are talking about is police shootings. These are (supposedly) highly trained individuals, and it happens that they have killed innocent people with incorrect judgment, bad days, etc.

      I have had extensive training with firearms (around 700hrs at a shooting range). I've been around guns my entire life. I don't take the power of my firearms for granted just as I don't take the power of a vehicle on a roadway for granted. I made the parent post mostly as poke at England. I don't usually carry a gun, and would not take a chance on getting myself killed by an armed mugger for an iPod. Oh, and as an aside, I'm a really calm dude, I've been in ONE fight in my entire life in high school defending myself from a bully dickhead (I've had my house broken into once, but my family and I weren't even there), I'm not some power hungry dick who carries a gun because it makes me feel good about myself, in fact I rarely carry a gun at all unless I'm headed to the range or the mountains to hunt.

      --
      -- Is it a right to remain ignorant? -- Calvin
    12. Re:Doesn't really matter to me... by n()_cHIEFz · · Score: 1

      Dude, did you look at the link?!? To hell with the gun an MP3 player, I want the chick!!!

      --
      -- Is it a right to remain ignorant? -- Calvin
    13. Re:Doesn't really matter to me... by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Well, in Ireland we are strongly anti-gun too (years of watching the lunatics up north shoot each other to shit does that to you). However, I'm glad you enjoyed your stay here and hope you return again.

    14. Re:Doesn't really matter to me... by n()_cHIEFz · · Score: 1

      Well, in Ireland we are strongly anti-gun too (years of watching the lunatics up north shoot each other to shit does that to you). However, I'm glad you enjoyed your stay here and hope you return again.

      I understand and respect your position on guns, I'm not a fan of the crime that surrounds guns, but they have their uses (hunting and recreation for me). And as for returning to Ireland, I really can't wait! It's a beautiful country and, as I said, the friendliest people I've yet encountered in my trips abroad (and more so than most of America as well!)

      --
      -- Is it a right to remain ignorant? -- Calvin
    15. Re:Doesn't really matter to me... by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
      In NZ, we have strict gun control, and low gun related crime rates, but there are still plenty of people who go hunting etc.

      A large rifle isn't something you can carry around discretly, and it's purpose is to shoot animals. Hand guns and automatic guns are obviously designed to shoot people, and they can be consealed easly. You won't find many of them around here.

    16. Re:Doesn't really matter to me... by easter1916 · · Score: 1
      Those are the only situations where gun ownership is allowed in Ireland too, and I believe it's limited to shotguns and low-calibre rifles. To get a permit, you must be a member of an established hunting club, and to become a member of a club, you must have character references from the local Police, the current directors of the club, etc. Every legally-held firearm is test-fired by the police each year and forensics taken and recorded.

      At the same time, gangland gun killings in the cities is on the increase, roughly one gun murder every four or five days -- which is high when you consider that our population is less than 4 million.

      Most of the illegally-held firearms are "surplus" from the paramilitaries up north, who are now moving into organised crime at full tilt -- they were always involved, but now they don't have the fun of killing one another to distract them, so violent crime is skyrocketing as they find new ways to entertain themselves.

      I don't know what the solution is, wish I did.

  68. When mugged... by freeze128 · · Score: 1

    Yes, give up the iPod, and give the mugger the headphones too. In fact, hand him a few other other things that he would want, and while he is juggling all of these, take his knife, and run.

    1. Re:When mugged... by DeputySpade · · Score: 1

      Yes, give up the iPod, and give the mugger the headphones too. In fact, hand him a few other other things that he would want, and while he is juggling all of these, take his knife, and run

      To heck with that. Take his knife, stab him with it, and get your stuff back.

      Run... Pfffth! Indeed!

      --


      This space intentionally left blank
  69. iPods have serial numbers by Rufosx · · Score: 1

    Not that this will deter many thefts at the moment, but as more pawn shops and criminals realize that the iPods can be tracked fairly easily, the mugging rate will decrease.

  70. West Midlands by mr_tommy · · Score: 4, Informative

    As a resident in Birmingham UK (The West Midlands) i might add that people world wide probably don't really need to worry to much. Birmingham has quite high crime rates and a lot of rich boroughs surrounding it - people are prime targets. People need only remember the shootings that took place over new years eve last year.

    1. Re:West Midlands by henele · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The police are right in saying West Midlands criminals are targeting specific groups.

      As a Birmingham student in halls of residence, both my next door neighbours, and then their neighbours, have all been broken into. One of the guys on the end had his room hit but he didn't have the notebook they were looking for so they left.

      I guess you could be it as some sort of social equilibrium in practice - students with so much near to areas of high unemployment, but what *really* pisses me off is when international students are (again intentionally) targeted - these are going to be important people who never want to come back to this city or country again. I guess the muggers aren't thinking of the global future but they really do a lot of unbalencing harm as well...

    2. Re:West Midlands by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      As a resident in Birmingham UK

      Birmingham =~ Detroit

      ?

    3. Re:West Midlands by dwpro · · Score: 1

      fancy that, a person that would take what is not his own by force is not thinking about the global impact of his actions. I bet he didn't research his target to make sure the victim didn't foster orphans or give to the poor, this anomaly among thieves.

      --
      Millions long for immortality who do not know what to do with themselves on a rainy Sunday afternoon. -- Susan Ertz
    4. Re:West Midlands by jred · · Score: 1

      People need only remember the shootings that took place over new years eve last year.

      Not to troll, but here in the US, they tell us that the UK doesn't have gun crime, because guns are illegal to own there. I didn't hear anything about shootings. Maybe the story "wasn't important enough"/censored :)

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
    5. Re:West Midlands by CavemanKiwi · · Score: 1

      As a resident in Birmingham UK You have my pity enuff said

    6. Re:West Midlands by yuud · · Score: 1

      lol do you really think a 'mugger' gives a shit about 'global balance'? I'm thinking about the old axiom about honour among thieves....

  71. Hey, cool! by pokeyburro · · Score: 1

    I hadn't realized Jack Handey had a Slashdot handle...

    --
    Lately democracy seems to be based on the skybox, the Happy Meal box, the X-box, and the idiot box.
  72. Re:great story ...have a similar one by addaon · · Score: 1

    /fnorgby

    --

    I've had this sig for three days.
  73. RoTK by Aqua_Geek · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why do you lay your troubles on an already troubled mind? Can't you see we grow tired of your... malcontent - your... fearmongering?

    Too long have you watched my iPod. Too long have you haunted its backlight.

    --
    Disclaimer: This comment was generated by a Flock of Trained Microsoft Programmers for Aqua_Geek.
  74. I can see it now by moltar77 · · Score: 1

    (Score:-1, Flamage)

  75. My Nomad Zen NX... by barfarf · · Score: 2, Insightful
    To say that white headphones are exclusive to targeting iPod users is kind of ridiculous. My Nomad Zen NX is also white with white headphones. Does this mean that I'm excluded from the muggings?

    /obvious and somewhat sarcastic

  76. Does that color make me look fat? by igrp · · Score: 1
    To quote what a friend of mine, who is a law enforcement officer, told a shady-looking guy who approached us at a drive-through ATM about his new red car:

    "Yeah, it also came with a shiny new badge and some black tupperware[1]."

    The guy just looked at him, puzzled, turned around and, literally, ran away. I just couldn't stop laughing...

    [1] Semi-automatic, plastic/polymer sidearm

  77. My name's Bernie Goetz , beeeeotch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
  78. fickle editors by kevcol · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Jeez- I submitted the original telegraph.co.uk story yesterday, it being rejected then too. These editors are so fickle.

    And someone needs to reboot images-aud.slashdot.org so my little mozilla firefoxy thingy stops spinning.

    1. Re:fickle editors by kevcol · · Score: 1

      Like I haven't seen that before, having had a /. reg/ID for the last 6 years? Are you also the hall monitor at your school?

    2. Re:fickle editors by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      I just don't understand why people always complain about this. You *know* that the eds have different opinions about stories and that complaining doesn't help you out. It's in the FAQ. This happens to people all the time. Something comes out on NYT or news.com and the eight zillion people that read it daily all submit it to Slashdot. I certainly don't think any less of anyone because they had a story rejected -- nor would I think any more highly of them because they had a story accepted.

      Heck, maybe they didn't like your presentation or something. It's not like any submissions are likely to get more than a couple of seconds' glance.

  79. I think you meant IPod ownership infringment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Mugging is not theft.

    It is property infringment. You can not steal atoms, neutons, or electrons.

    You have done nothing wrong.

    I think tonight I will go out and infringe on somebody wallet ownership rights. Then I may infringe on some convience stores "cash register contents" ownership right.

    Don't cal me a thief, I am simply infringing and the person who makes the wallet only get a tiny amount of what the guy pays for it anyway.

    1. Re:I think you meant IPod ownership infringment by benna · · Score: 1

      However the guy is then deprived of his property (wallet). This is not the case with music piracy. You just copy the file and the other person keeps his as well. I dont care anyway, I need my money more than the record industry does.

      --
      "It is not how things are in the world that is mystical, but that it exists." -Ludwig Wittgenstein
    2. Re:I think you meant IPod ownership infringment by Texas+Rose+on+Lava+L · · Score: 1

      If you can find a way of copying my Ipod that doesn't deprive me of the ability to use my Ipod, I won't complain. In fact, how would I even know you did anything?

      On the other hand, if you steal my Ipod (so I can't use it anymore) I'll call the cops, just as a record label would call the cops if you broke into their building and destroyed all their copies of the latest britney spears album.

    3. Re:I think you meant IPod ownership infringment by dukeisgod · · Score: 1

      Mod parent down for blatant troll. P.S. Ob. Simpsons reference, a young Mr. Burns busting an atom smashing employee for having some atoms in his pocket. You can so steal atoms, as well as the various subatomic particles that compose them.

    4. Re:I think you meant IPod ownership infringment by JamieF · · Score: 1

      Muggers probably need money more than muggees do.

      Rapists probably have had consensual sex less often than their victims have.

      Do you need a particular song more than the person who created it needs to be paid for their work? (Fuck them, they should have to entertain you for free!) Do you hate all musicians that much? Maybe you should start listening to music made by respectable musicans...

    5. Re:I think you meant IPod ownership infringment by JamieF · · Score: 1

      >I'll call the cops, just as a record label would call the cops if you broke into their building and destroyed all their copies of the latest britney spears album.

      But think of the cred you'd get for doing it! No jury would convict you...

    6. Re:I think you meant IPod ownership infringment by benna · · Score: 1

      Most of the music I listen to the artists (if they were still alive) would probobly aprove of me downloading, even if the record companies would not.

      --
      "It is not how things are in the world that is mystical, but that it exists." -Ludwig Wittgenstein
  80. D'oh! by Aqua_Geek · · Score: 1

    I just remembered that it's from Two Towers, not Return of the King. I really need to get some sleep...

    --
    Disclaimer: This comment was generated by a Flock of Trained Microsoft Programmers for Aqua_Geek.
  81. Justifiable by Simple-Simmian · · Score: 1

    I was justifiable.

    "Police said no motive has been confirmed, although evidence suggested the murder was the result of a domestic dispute after Pulaski erased the contents of Mathers' iPod."

    He had it comming. She just reformatted him in kind.

    Yea it's a sick joke. So what.

    --
    If you don't like what I write don't be a CS and mod it down. Refute it.
    Yea I can't spell. So what is your point?
  82. White headphones for a sony discman? by xot · · Score: 1

    I'm lookin out for white iPod type headphones for my Sony discman.Anyone?
    Looks like theres a small possibility that i might be cool afterall! :-)

    --
    Lord of the Binges.
  83. Doesn't this mean the police have work to do? by Spintronic · · Score: 1

    Do the police also tell people in Midlands to make their BMWs look like 87 Civics? I mean, isn't the obvious solution to have more non-uniformed police walk around with white headphones? I would assume that in any given population, those who mug people are a pretty small percentage, and if you know their target, they shouldn't be too difficult to pick up. Maybe the police in Midlands should just give up and advise people to stay at home.

    1. Re:Doesn't this mean the police have work to do? by gone.fishing · · Score: 1

      I had a friend who thought about this kind of stuff a lot. He wondered things like: "Why do cops give out speeding tickets and not spend time investigating felonies?" His conclusion was that cops like janitors, construction workers and most other hourly laborers have a couple of things in common. First they are as lazy as they can be and still keep their jobs. Giving a speeding ticket shows you are working but it is infinately easier than chasing a mugger through the woods and if you are occupied giving a ticket when the call comes, another car will be dispatched. Second, they are motivated by money which in their case means overtime. If they fill their regular hours with speeding tickets, maybe they will need to work overtime to address the real problems.

      I don't know if I completely agree with him but it is hard to argue that there is at least some logic there!

      When a street cop takes a report of a mugging, and he doesn't catch the mugger what really happens? It becomes a statistic. The more time that passes between the crime the less the chance of solving the crime. That is a fact. Eventually the report reaches the detectives who read it and file it away. When they catch a bad guy, they look at his belongings and compare them to the list of stolen property that way a few (probably very few) things can be returned to their owners, the remainder sold at police auction.

      But they have to do something. That something is a crime advisory. It costs nothing. It makes people feel better and it makes it look like the cops are doing something. Of course, it is the minimum possible thing.

      Best advice is to be prepared to defend yourself, or to not get into those situations. Your safety and your security are ultimately your responsibility. And that is probably the way it should be.

    2. Re:Doesn't this mean the police have work to do? by Fishd · · Score: 1
      Best advice is to be prepared to defend yourself, or to not get into those situations. Your safety and your security are ultimately your responsibility. And that is probably the way it should be.

      I made fun of this earlier but it's a serious point. In Britain (not sure where you're from) if I punched a mugger then chances are I'm up on an assault charge while his legal-aid funded lawyer tries to convince the jury that his client was asking me for the time when I jumped him. I'm forking out a small fortune for my lawyer because I work and therefore do not qualify for legal aid. Meanwhile the jury just wants to be let out and get back to their regular lives, sod all this "fulfilling your civic duty" crap.

      And if finally the mugger is found guilty he may be fined + costs payable to me at 50 pence per month for the rest of his life, I go on his "I'm gonna git you sucka" hit list as he is given a "pick up garbage for six weeks" community sentance as our jails are fit to burst as it is!

      A citizens safety and security are things that the government is supposed to guarantee.

      IIRC the American consitution says something about this:

      We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

      Whereas us Brits have only those assigned by the European Court of Human Rights:

      The governments signatory hereto, being members of the Council of Europe, Being resolved to take steps to ensure the collective enforcement of certain rights and freedoms... *snip* Section 1: Every natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions. No one shall be deprived of his possessions except in the public interest and subject to the conditions provided for by law and by the general principles of international law.

      Ergo, Tony Blairs fault, possibly David Blunkett too.

    3. Re:Doesn't this mean the police have work to do? by Fishd · · Score: 1

      Ack, missed a paragraph!

      I certainly agree it is a citizens responsibility to a degree (i.e. running up and down the street shouting about and waving a shiney new iPod around is plain dumb). But surely using the device while having it secured in your inside pocket is not exactly being cavalier and you should be able to expect others to respect your and your right to privacy/freedom from crime.

      If I see someone driving down the road in a new Ferrari/Porsche/whatever then sure, my first thought is "bastard!" however, my second thought is not to carjack them at the next set of lights! It's their stuff, and no matter how much I want/need it, it's not mine to take. Any other line of thought is just plain wrong otherwise we'd have the Red Cross mugging people in Hollywood. "Hand over the Rolex, it's for a good cause... slowly... slowly... hands off the mace man! Millions are starving dammit!"

    4. Re:Doesn't this mean the police have work to do? by gone.fishing · · Score: 1

      I'm in the USA. Minneapolis, MN to be more precise.

      I don't own an iPod but if I did, there are places where I would elect to leave it safely at home rather than carry it. I live in a fairly nice part of town but am only a few blocks from a tougher part of town. I would not wear an iPod there, nor would I wear one downtown in the evening. It is just common sense really. Sometimes it just isn't worth the risk.

      We have similar stupid laws here in the USA. I am allowed to defend myself if there is no other way but if I can evade and choose to fight, then I am liable for my actions even if I am being robbed. At least I have a right to protect myself and my property but it is quite limited in scope when you really think about it.

      But laws or no laws, when it comes right down to it, we are the people in charge of our own destiny. We are responsible for putting ourselves in a situation where we may be robbed and we should think about things we can do to minimize our risk.

      Several years ago, I stopped by a convenience store after a concert, it was quite late and I needed milk and a few odds and ends. The store was not in the nicest part of town (actually that is an understatement) but it was just a quick stop for things I needed and it was right there. I made my purchase and walked outside. Two people (gangsta's) started walking right along with me. As I came to the corner of the building I realized I was going to be jumped and felt powerless to stop it. I got angry and just growled, angry at myself for being so vunerable. This noise told the gangsta's that I was aware of what was going to happen and it scared them off. I was quite vunerable, my hands were full and nobody was around to help me.

      When I thought about it later, I realized what had happened. It was late enough so that almost everyone going into that store that time of night was drinking (it was close to the bar district). Although I was vunerable, I was aware of my surroundings and that scared them off, they were looking for an easier target.

      A week later someone was killed at that store, late at night. There were two suspects that matched the description of the guys that followed me. I was lucky. It could have been me. It wasn't me because I was not an easy target. Crooks are lazy, they will choose the most vunerable.

      If you are in a rough neighborhood, you are vunerable if you are wearing headphones because you are blocking your sense of hearing. You are probably double vunerable if they are white because that is an indicator of the value of the device.

  84. i dont use the white headphones anyway by cyrax777 · · Score: 1

    Becouse there earbuds and kept falling out. I use my Standard sony i got for around 20 sounds just as good as far as I can tell and no annoying earbuds falling out.

  85. Hate Apple? by bonch · · Score: 1

    From hilariously predicting the "failure" of the iPod-mini to breathlessly declaring that the iPod is susceptible to muggers and is a "must-have," do Slashdotters hate the iPod or something? Is Taco still pissed off about batteries?

    Just curious.

    1. Re:Hate Apple? by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      We don't hate Apple. We find 'fashion merchandising' of tech products highly annoying, though.

      --
      ---
  86. just tape 2 $100 bills to your hat. by purduephotog · · Score: 4, Funny

    It will distract the mugger so that he demands your hat, and you will escape with your precioussssssssss ipod intact.

    This procedure also helps to hide ketchup stains on your shirt.

    1. Re:just tape 2 $100 bills to your hat. by Talez · · Score: 1

      But then he'll have my hat!

      God damn it, man! Get your priorities straight!

  87. Macworld.co.uk says this is mostly urban legend by kent.dickey · · Score: 1

    Macworld UK had a story about this earlier today:

    'iPod mugging' latest media frenzy

    Basically, this Roland guy is the one person any serious journalist has found to have been mugged for his iPod. That being said, carrying around a $400 device probably does raise your chances of being mugged. But there's no evidence iPods are being targeted. You're probably just as likely to be mugged for your battered Walkman.

  88. Re:So it looks like by elbarrio · · Score: 1

    Most muggers won't have the ipod 12 hours after they've stolen it from you. It will already be at the closest pawn shop so they can buy drugs with the cash they god. This is not exactly a profession that's chosen rationally, but rather out of desperation. The guys who sell the drugs, now they're the ones who keep and use the ipods.

  89. Not me! by tybalt44 · · Score: 1

    I don't use headphones. My iPod uses a 3/4" plug directly into my cerebral cortex.

  90. ipod shaped stun-gun.... by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    is Next Season's must have :-).

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  91. You mean... j.Lo.Jack? by Behrooz · · Score: 1

    ...and here I thought that a more sought-after activity would be j.Lo.Jack.

    Oh well. This is Slashdot, after all...

    --
    "We have to go forth and crush every world view that doesn't believe in tolerance and free speech." - David Brin
  92. Cops with white headphones. by Thag · · Score: 1

    This says to me "send out plainclothes cops with white headphones."

    No need for them even to be hooked into an iPod, just the headphones.

    Jon Acheson

    --
    All opinions expressed herein are my own, and not those of my employers, who are appalled.
  93. for lethal enforcers by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1

    I know some of you like to say that you have a gun right next to your iPod. I think I found some anti-theft ideas that you might like.

    --
    Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
  94. Why people get mugged? by elbarrio · · Score: 5, Interesting
    From my rooftop in Spanish Harlem I have had the pleasure of witnessing a couple of muggings. From what I can tell muggers tend to prey on whomever they think is the easiest target. They generally don't go after you if you're with someone else, especially if you're two guys. They won't go after you if you look big and strong. And, no one ever seems to believe this, they will not go after you if you walk too fast. Part of mugging someone is the element of surpise and if they have to run to catch up with you, then their cover is blown. I have witnessed at least one case where I actually had the cell in my hand about to dial 911, but the person who I thought was going to be mugged, walked too quick for her would be attacker to catch up, and he gave up.

    Okay, all that slightly offtopic stuff said, wearing white headphones will not get you mugged. However, if some guy on an empty street stops you and asks you if you have an ipod, and you stop walking, look at them, and respond... well that may get you mugged, as it did the victim in the story.

    1. Re:Why people get mugged? by Solo-Malee · · Score: 1

      Part of mugging someone is the element of surpise and if they have to run to catch up with you, then their cover is blown

      Surely however fast and noisily you're walking, you're always gonna be surprised from behind if you've got earbuds of any colour stuffed in your lugs pumping out your favourite tunes?

      --
      "If it's lost, it'll turn up. Things always do" "I love it when a plan comes together"
    2. Re:Why people get mugged? by elbarrio · · Score: 1

      True, listening to any walkman, regardless of its price and color of headphones, in a situation where mugging is a possibility is pretty dumb. For instance, if it's midnight, and you're in a quiet, urban neighborhood, not being able to hear your surroundings puts you at a significant disadvantage. This includes any urban neighborhood, by the way, not just low-income, "scary" ones like Spanish Harlem. The same thing could happen to you on the Upper East side or in Midtown Manhattan. That said, this is only true if the attacker can hear your music. They must believe it loud enough that you won't hear them coming. Even then, running for them is very risky (what if a cop passes and sees them running at someone, rather than walking). In fact, in every mugging I've seen, including the one that I saw first hand (I was dumb, I walked too slow and was eating french fries... I might as well worn a target), the assailants walked away so that they would not draw attention to themselves when they got to the busier avenue.

  95. FUD Alert! by useosx · · Score: 5, Informative

    Great, Pudge didn't do his homework on this one.

    I considered submitting this story, but I was busy and now I regret it because according to this MacWorld UK article, this is just an unsubstantiated media frenzy. The proof of how widespread these muggings are is still pretty sketchy.

    1. Re:FUD Alert! by hugzz · · Score: 1

      When I see white headphones and a ipod remote on someone I dont like, I consider it. White earphones along aren't enough since Sony ex71s come in white.

    2. Re:FUD Alert! by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yeah this is FUD, but how long before it's not because of people who read about it in the paper? There's a great book subtitled _Mugging, the State, and Law and Order_ (I don't remember the rest of the info) that looks at how mugging became popular in England during the 1970s (when it was still primarily an American phenomenon); the authors argue that the media frenzy about mugging preceded any actual mugging epidemic. It might not occur to some people until they read this article that a good way to target victims is looking out for the white headphones.

      But really the overall point of the article is just banal -- crooks are not just out looking for iPods; they'll likely settle for any relatively expensive item that is small, easy to carry/conceal, and easy to pawn. I had an ipod stolen once (at aiport security at LAX) because I wasn't paying attention to it (yes, this is moronic on my part, but I didn't think about the fact that airport security might rip me off, so I didn't notice it missing until I was mid-flight). But I don't think the crooks were just gunning for my ipod; I think any expensive small item I had would have satisfied them.

    3. Re:FUD Alert! by md358 · · Score: 1

      the authors argue that the media frenzy about mugging preceded any actual mugging epidemic.

      Yeah, that was true in Canada in the early 90s with car-jackings. There had never been one before, but after local media in Toronto extensively covered a rash of 'jackings in LA there was immediately a couple of copycats. Car-jackings now occur in the major cities here at the rate of a couple a year, even as the rates for other types of crime fall.

  96. Sharpie to the rescue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Step 1: choose desired sharpie color
    Step 2: disguise your white earphones using said sharpie
    Step 3: fear not vial muggers

    Sharpie... defeats cd copy protection, thwarts muggers, what next (only time will tell). Warning - may result in slight discoloration in ear canal.

    1. Re:Sharpie to the rescue! by Hassman · · Score: 1

      Step 4: Profit?

      --
      -Mark
      Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
  97. Actually, there's a second part to the story... by zogger · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    .. I left something out. In georgia, cops are allowed to moonlight, wearing their uniforms. When the mugger wannabe took of running, I had seen a cop earlier directing traffic closeby, in and out of a parking garage (rush hour, natch). I walked over to him, to report the attempted mugging. I left nothing out, including my inspired quip, and pointed out the guy, still splitting at a brisk pace, down the street to the cop. Cop sez "-> whut ya want me to do about it?" I sez -> "arrest him????". Cop sez -> "I'm working this garage right now, ain't on duty, and the mugger dint get nuthin".

    Well, that settled that. Mr. Mugger gets away to go prey on someone else. Oh well, so much for cops wanting to "serve justice". I always knew that was a load of horse hockey anyway....

    True facts

    He never asked me for a carry permit, but I had one in my wallet. Right now, I think it's bogus, I prefer honest vermont state styled carry, ie "allowed by default by second amendment born-with, not to be denied by any government goon inalienable right", but discretion being the better part of not going to the hoosegow, I get their illegal "permit". To me it's as illegal and stupid and unconstitutional as applying for a "free speech" permit or applying to the state for a "right to associate with my friends" permit. ditto for their freedom to travel "permits", illegal as heck, but it'sso entrenched now and people so brainwashed that they get away with it..

    zognote: vermont, with about zip gun laws, has incredibly low crime rate. It has a few large cities, too, it's not all rural, but granted, fairly rural.

    I understand switzerland has the lowest crime rates in industrialised europe, yet is the most liberal on gun ownership. Coincidence? I think not.

    1. Re:Actually, there's a second part to the story... by Bertie · · Score: 1

      Gun crime's low in Switzerland because people are all well enough off that they've no need to go and mug or rob others. Simple as that.

      On the other hand, the number of people who commit suicide using the gun which the state requires them to have is out of all proportion.

  98. I'm not giving up my white headphones by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 1

    I'll shank someone with my keys... there's no way I'm giving up my white headphones.

    iPod, the Raider's parka of the new millennium :)

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
  99. Or by Hershmire · · Score: 1

    You could just hit him with the tape deck.

    --
    if(!toilet_paper) roll.replace(new roll); //Stupid roommates.
  100. It's not the IPOD by peripatetic_bum · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Im surprised that no one has mentioned this so I will (this is called insightful :)

    Anyway, the people with IPODs are no being mugged becuase of the IPOD. They are being mugged because of what the IPOD signifies. Someone who has an IPOD probably access to disposable cash and so make a richer target then other people. Also since this person is the kind of person to get an IPOD they are also less likely to put up a fight (ok I just made that up)

    Anyway, the point is that Muggers are using IPODS for selection of their targets *and* they get a cool IPOD to boot

    I would like to hear your thoughts on this. Thanks

    --

    Sigs are dangerous coy things

    1. Re:It's not the IPOD by Mad+Leper · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you mean ..had access to disposable cash... (past tense)

      Sorry ;)

      I don't think that just because someone has an IPOD on their person it means there's a big wad of cash in their pocket.

    2. Re:It's not the IPOD by Rew190 · · Score: 1

      I see iPods all over colleges. College kids generally don't have disposable incomes, but they are wildly popular. Remember who these iPods are being marketed to... it's not the rich folks...

      Also, don't forget that Apple is very strict with iPod prices, so a 300 dollar iPod in good condition could be easily sold for over 150.

    3. Re:It's not the IPOD by tm1rules · · Score: 1

      Also, People listening to any type of headphones are targets because they can't hear the mugger if they are attacked from behind.

    4. Re:It's not the IPOD by CGP314 · · Score: 1

      Please stick to apple standard spelling. iPod not IPOD. : P


      -Colin

  101. Mugging by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

    F***ing muggles!

  102. Guns are dangerous. Duh! by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 3, Informative
    Firearms kill more children in the United States than any other cause except motor-vehicle crashes and cancer. Over the period studied, 1988-97, nearly 7,000 children aged between five and 14 were killed with firearms. Before an American child reaches 15, he or she is 12 times more likely to die of gunshot wounds than a child anywhere else in the industrialised world. Source: The Economist, February 2002
    Figures for gun-related deaths speak for themselves:
    High-gun states, (low gun states)
    Gun suicides - 153 (22)
    Non-gun suicides - 69 (82)
    Gun homocides - 298 (86)
    Non-gun homocides - 143 (110)
    Gun accident deaths - 253 (15) Source: Miller, Azrael and Hemmenway, February 2002
    Guns make society safer? I don't think so. If the incident mentioned in the article had taken place in the USA, there's a higher liklihood that at least one person would have been shot dead. As violent and troubling as it is, nobody was injured in this incident because it took place in a society where people aren't given a right to shoot first and ask questions later. In the UK you are less likely to meet a hostile person with a gun, therefore less likely to become a victim of gun-related crime.
    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  103. In the state of Idaho by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

    It is legal to carry around a gun unless it's hidden. Don't try going going into a store with a rifle strapped to you back though, they'll kick you out for makikng the other customers(not to mention the emploees) nervous.

  104. Re: WA State by phoneyman · · Score: 1

    That's exactly my point. Why mess around with a device like a Taser, which in many cases is regulated as harshly as a firearm, when you can just use a firearm instead?

    Less-than-lethal force is for law enforcement only, it has no place at all in civilian self-defence. If your life is really in danger, defend it with lethal force.

    Pierre

  105. another bonus by geekoid · · Score: 1

    misuse C4, help clean the gene pool!

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:another bonus by Anonymous+Slacker · · Score: 1

      And when the police question why the iPod blew up, just tell them the battery must have exploded.

      --
      "If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice!" -Rush
  106. Asking for it, really by seymansey · · Score: 2, Funny

    Heh, when i bought my ipod, i didn't bother using the stock earphones, granted i tried them, but i find them very good. Plus i didn't want to show the world that i owned an ipod and so carried on using my beloved Bang and Olufsen earphone ( They may cost $150 but they are the dogs ). I lent my ipod earphones to a mate who had a crappy 128MB MP3 player and he had the pleasure of people asking him if he had an ipod. Plus he looked stupid when he pulled out a battered MP3 player

  107. The earphones suck anyway by poing · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ditch the white earphones, period. If you're going to spend a few hundred bucks on a portable music player you may as well spend a bit more to actually be able to experience the full sound quality the iPod is able to provide. My recommendation: Etymotic ER-4P. Anyone who's heard them plugged into an iPod will see that the original white earphones are laughably bad in comparison and do not do the iPod justice. It's like a night & day difference. The etymotics just sound so much clearer, crisper and better in every way...

    1. Re:The earphones suck anyway by tzadic · · Score: 1

      You're so right. I was expecting this to be the first thing anybody pointed out, not one of the last. First thing i did was ditch mine, they sound like crap, and are uncomfortable as all hell to boot. I like the Sony mdr-ed21's, which are good quality at an amazingly cheap $20, and extremely comfortable.

  108. worse than headphones: mug-me cases by timothy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Can't find the link right now (damn badly indexed megaretailer sites!), but I've seen a fry's a bulky waist-worn iPod pouch with (get this) a series of blinking LEDs on the outside that pulse their blueness to the world.

    I wonder if they blink Morse for "mug wearer -- iPod enclosed ... mug wearer -- iPod enclosed... mug wearer - iPod enclosed ..."

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
    1. Re:worse than headphones: mug-me cases by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      I wonder if they blink Morse for "mug wearer -- iPod enclosed ... mug wearer -- iPod enclosed... mug wearer - iPod enclosed ..."

      You have to read Morse code just to be a mugger these days? Boy, the digital divide really is widening.

  109. Re:ok, I know this is slashdot by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

    Uh, no. Women fart. Ladies fan the air and declare how stuffy it is.

  110. Are you serious ? by Tsiangkun · · Score: 1

    I have always been confused by the need to be recognized for my possesions. This might be why I have never been that popular, I just don't care what other people think.

    Anyways, I received an iPod for some code I wrote for a friend of mine . . . plus 6 years of support of said code. I never knew I needed an iPod until I had one in my hands. After noticing the price (~500usd), and the neighborhood (Oakland), I never took the headphones out of the packaging . . . and instead used my ratty old headphones from my cd player. It was obvious to me, that if I was going to steal an iPod, the headphones and cord would be the tell. If someone chooses to advertise a few hundred dollars in their pocket while being distracted by music . . . I can't really blame the thug for targetting them. I see this as a form of evolution . . . or maybe a robbin hood type redistribution of iPods.

    Oh, and I tried my friends stock white headphones, and they were not as comfortable or as fidelitous as my old ones.

    --Tsiangkun

  111. The RIAA by nsideops · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They finally have some basis for what they have been saying this entire time. Someone is really stealing music now.

    --
    Teach someone to use the net and they won't bother you for weeks; show them Slashdot and you may never see them again.
  112. Indeed! That's why... by anomalousman · · Score: 1

    That's why America is internationally famous for having such a low rate of muggings.

    I have a vision of a nation where everyone is free to carry nuclear-armed surface to air missiles. Such a place would be forever free of terrorism and problems of all kinds.

  113. USA and CHL (Concealed Handgun license) laws. by Nonesuch · · Score: 1
    The exceptions seem to be the most heavily populated areas. Chicago, New york and the like.
    The gun laws in Chicago are insane. The state of Illinois would have Indiana-style CHL if it were not for Cook county and Mayor Daley.

    New York State has relatively easily obtained "may issue" CHL, except in New York City and the surrounding counties where for some reason only celebrities and other rich white people can obtain a permit.

    For all your CHL questions, see http://www.packing.org/

  114. Liability by rustycage · · Score: 1

    If you mugged someone for their ipod, would you not also be liable for any illegally downloaded songs on that ipod? That could be a hefty fine.

    --
    No Sig For You
  115. It's okay. This is Texas. by csoto · · Score: 1

    We have a Concealed Handgun Law. Is that an iPod in my pocket, or a Desert Eagle .50?

    --
    There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
  116. Re:iPod = lame by Saturninus · · Score: 2, Funny

    But it's so sexy that I could make love to it!

  117. Flashing wealth is stupid by Mr.+Piddle · · Score: 1, Insightful


    Anyone who exposes themselves as a target deserve what they get. Wearing jewelry or expensive watches or expensive shoes or driving expensive cars in many areas is just a big problem waiting to happen. People who don't believe this are naive. There are a lot of desperate people out there, and it is always best they victimize someone else.

    --
    Vote in November. You won't regret it.
    1. Re:Flashing wealth is stupid by Fishd · · Score: 1

      Yeah, what he said.

      It doesn't matter how hard working or well paid you are, if you stop to enjoy the fruits of your labour then shame on you and you deserve all the beatings that the mugger will give you, after all, you can afford a crack habit, he can't!

      And don't expect any sympathy or help from the police, so what you pay your taxes and therefore their wages, if you're stupid enough to buy cool stuff then it's your fault! It's up to you to protect yourself from crime and criminals, not the newly named Police Advisory Helpline and (insert name of your deity here) help you if you ever fight back, that mugger will be on legal-aid and have your ass in court on assault charges before you can say "WTF?"

      Meanwhile your friendly local copper can't catch criminals as he has been downgraded to replacing film in speed cameras, lawyers use their clients drug dependency as an excuse rather than the cause of the crime, the courts waste their time deciding whose side of the boundary your neighbours fence is *REALLY* on and judges are caught with kiddie-pr0n/prostitutes/copies of "Justice for Dummies(c)"

      Three cheers for the British legal system!

    2. Re:Flashing wealth is stupid by Mr.+Piddle · · Score: 1

      if you stop to enjoy the fruits of your labour then shame on you and you deserve all the beatings that the mugger will give you, after all

      It is very possible to be wealthy and enjoy it but not blatently look like it. Once the kids, nieces, and nephews have their college funds set up, the garage has two reliable but not luxury cars, the house is well landscaped, etc. etc., then remaining excess easily goes towards a comfortable retirement, investment in other businesses, and/or charity. Using that money for a Rolex diamond-studded watch or Lexus AT-AT behemoth is just not necessary.

      --
      Vote in November. You won't regret it.
  118. So do cars by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

    That's why you don't ever see them stolen anymore.

    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
  119. Not all Hype by loveisafist · · Score: 1

    A co-worker of mine was waiting to catch his train for his morning commute when he was 'pod-jacked'. Apparently someone was eyeing up his white headphones and when he removed the iPod from his pocket to change songs they ran past him grabbing the iPod. The headphone cord pulled free and off they went... He, not being in the best shape, wasn't able to run up the steps fast enough after the guy. So now he has 'cool' white headphones and a cheap ass RCA Lyra that is the size of a small kitchen appliance!

  120. Come to Hong Kong... by TheOtherKiwi · · Score: 3, Funny

    In Hong Kong there are plenty of rip-off white headphones so mugging these people is likely to get you a $10 FM radio :-)

    --

    -- Sig meltdown immine...
  121. Re:This just in... by vegetablespork · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Hmph. I thought Patrick Leahy and Orin Hatch were the paid thugs.

    --

    Call (206) 338-5780 COLLECT for information about a genuine BA, BS, MA, MS, MBA, or Ph.D.

  122. Don't make me laugh... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

    Even the article that you link to, which was written in October of last year, puts the number of gun-related crimes (which, as I previously explained, is a loosely defined term in the UK) for 2002 at around 10,000 incidents.

    But, overall, the article that you refer to is both out of date and misleading. Read these two articles for a more up-to-date and accurate pitcure:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3419401.stm

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3419941.stm

    Note, before you want to use it as an argument about how bad the situation is in Britain, that "violent crime" is defined as including anti-social behaviour in general, so it includes offences that would be classed as misdemeanours rather than felonies in the US.

    Anyhow, the most recent statistics show a year on year increase in gun crime of 2 percent, which totalled 10,248 offences, or 0.41% of all crime committed. Within that 10,248 offences, there were 1,815 crimes that were known to have involved imitation firearms only, so the actual number of crimes that involved anything that could fire any kind of ammunition (including air rifles and guns) was 8,433. Furthermore, only 9 percent of the 10,248 offences resulted in any injury - so that's less than a thousand in total.

    Only 81 murders involved guns compared, down from 97 the year before.

    The number of robberies involving guns was down by 13 percent.

    The number of handguns used to commit a crime was down by 6 percent.

    Tell me again about how gun crime is "rampant" in the UK?

    Of course gun crime is politically sensitive but that's because the idea of guns in general are so abhorrent to British society that they have shock value, just like Janet Jackson's right nipple does in the US. However, the idea that it's "top of the political agenda" is laughable: there are other more pressing issues such as terrorism, the war in Iraq, the EU constitution and enlargement, health, education, etc that are of far greater concern to MPs and the average man on the street.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  123. Simple scenario by ^_^x · · Score: 2, Funny

    "I'm so cool... I could've got an MP3 player that does more for less, but instead I sunk half a grand into this shiny Apple one! Marvel, peasants! Marvel at my excessive wealth!"

    "*YOINK!*"

    "Damn! Ah well, the battery was starting to go anyway. I'll have to buy another one tomorrow."

  124. This is why... by drcagn · · Score: 1

    This is another reason I got my iRiver iHP-120 over an iPod. I live in Louisiana, and without commercials, no one here knows what the hell the thing is anyway.

    --
    Scorta futuere amo!
  125. Re:Guns are dangerous. Duh! by FredFnord · · Score: 1

    Got a link to that study? The only one I could find was one that was exclusively suicides, no homicides involved. I'd be curious to see what states they consider to be 'high-gun states'.

    -fred

    --
    Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
  126. LOL by Psychic+Burrito · · Score: 3, Insightful

    LOL :-)

    The $500'000 question is: Are the modders having fun with these mods, or are they just brainless zombies?

    You know what? Let's ask the moderators!

    For zombies, please mod me redundant
    For having fun, please mod me insighfull

  127. RE: bleah.... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    My first thought is "Who cares!?!"

    Seriously, walking around in the "wrong neighborhood" with anything of value means you're at risk of having said item forcibly removed from your person.

    If it's not your iPod, it's your wristwatch or your new pair of sneakers, or maybe your new leather jacket.... Whatever....

    This isn't really news, and probably is only relevant at all because too many ignorant teenagers run around with their iPods conspicuously displayed for the "coolness" factor, instead of just using them as the music listening devices they are.

    Most of us with nice car audio systems already learned long ago that it's best to hide them when they're not in use, or perhaps even turn them down if you're driving in a bad area. (You can scarcely buy a new stereo head unit that doesn't have some sort of ability to remove the faceplate or have it flip around backwards so only a blank panel is showing.) Use the same common sense with your iPod and you should be fine.

  128. crime exists everywhere... by zogger · · Score: 1

    ... but, the farther you get away from larger cities the less crime there is. More or less, mostly less, but I understand what you are saying. the comparison between kennesaw georgia and morton grove illinois when they pased the opposing viewpoints of righteous self defense is about the best anecdotal out there with the "gun question"..

    I moved from 'lanta in 99 to the mountains, then moved again last summer to a scosh and a county above you right now. Much less crime, but I got a suspicion it will increase within the next few years if the economy continues to bork like it's been doing and if we become even more...hmm, got to be politically correct here... "multi cultural". Starting to see gang signs a la graffiti around lately, and reading the police reports in the local rag there's a rise in that sort of "free trade" imported activity. That and utterly brane dead rural rednecks who've decided crank + mass quantities of booze is just a swell idea. That's making crime rates go up fast.

    I got no easy answers for any of that noise, other than my old boy sprout training of "be prepared", which covers a lot of ground.

  129. Re:Guns are dangerous. Duh! by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here it is, but I think paid subscription to the Economist is required.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  130. Jedi Mind Tricks by Aqua_Geek · · Score: 1

    I just use the force:

    These aren't the iPods you're looking for.

    --
    Disclaimer: This comment was generated by a Flock of Trained Microsoft Programmers for Aqua_Geek.
  131. Re: WA State by tepples · · Score: 1

    If your life is really in danger, defend it with lethal force.

    And if your life is not in danger, but your possessions are, what's wrong with using nonlethal force again?

  132. Re: WA State by bellings · · Score: 1

    Normally, muggers threaten you with lethal force, and agree to remove that threat in return for your possessions.

    I agree, though, that if your possessions are threatened but you're not being threatened with lethal force (like, for example, if some asshat is threatening to bring a frivolous lawsuit against you) a taser may be appropriate. But, you're going to have a difficult time convincing a jury of that.

    --
    Slashdot is jumping the shark. I'm just driving the boat.
  133. Get a 'bone phone' by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    If they are still sold anywhere.. they would slip under your shirt.. no one would ever know you have any musical device...

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  134. take me I'm yours by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Ah, now I know why I want GPS in my iPod.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  135. iPod Micro by nacturation · · Score: 1

    You must be referring to the iPod Micro Edition, previously featured here on Slashdot.

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  136. Re:Guns are dangerous. Duh! by antirename · · Score: 1

    And if the mugger got shot, that's a BAD thing? Personally, it wouldn't bother me much. I think firearms training or a skill test should be required before carry permits are issued, but only to maximize the dead mugger/dead victim ratio.

  137. The defense against this... by vudufixit · · Score: 2, Funny

    Set up a decoy squad of people with nothing but really twangy country and western tunes in their ipods. I doubt many muggers will try it again after they get a taste of ol' Merle in his prime.

  138. Re:LOL by spood · · Score: 1

    LMAO! This thread is classic! I think I might even put it in my sig!

    --
    ---- Just another spud server.
  139. Re: WA State by darkpixel2k · · Score: 1

    If someone is in your house stealing your stuff at some dark hour of the night, how do you know your life isn't in danger?

    --
    There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
  140. Re:And your State disallows Concealed Carry by Qacker · · Score: 1
    Log in so I can add you to my friends list!

    thehighroad.org is a good gun forum
    a-human-right.org is a good pro RKBA site

    --
    Learn lisp today!
  141. Muggage by DrugCheese · · Score: 1

    Great word

    --
    *DrugCheese rants*
  142. Is something wrong with my browser? by ChimaObialo · · Score: 1

    (despite what the dreck^H^H^H^H^Hmarketting literature says)

    Is this a Firefox thing, or do people really keep typing carets and capital letters in the middle of their posts? And if it's intentional, is that a /. thing?

    1. Re:Is something wrong with my browser? by phoneyman · · Score: 1

      It's a Usenet thing.

      There are two keys on a keyboard used to delete characters, the Delete key - which on some UNIXes (maybe all?) is translated to a ....hmmm, can't remember which ctrl-key, anywhoo, the backspace character is ^H. The caret stands for the ctrl key.

      The relevance of this is that on some terminals ^H would delete and on some terminals Delete would delete, and often the character ^H would show up as exactly that on terminals that didn't recognize backspace. So instead of seeing the corrected word, one would see the screw^H^H^H^H^Hmessed up one.

      HTH,

      Pierre

    2. Re:Is something wrong with my browser? by ChimaObialo · · Score: 1

      Oh, I get it. So it's kinda like the MS Word track changes?

    3. Re:Is something wrong with my browser? by phoneyman · · Score: 1

      No, it's not even close.

      Pierre

    4. Re:Is something wrong with my browser? by juhaz · · Score: 3, Informative

      It probably predeces even the usenet.

      From the Jargon file, under "Hacker Writing Style":

      There is also an accepted convention for 'writing under erasure'; the text

      Be nice to this fool^H^H^H^Hgentleman, he's visiting from corporate HQ.

      reads roughly as "Be nice to this fool, er, gentleman...", with irony emphasized. The digraph ^H is often used as a print representation for a backspace, and was actually very visible on old-style printing terminals. As the text was being composed the characters would be echoed and printed immediately, and when a correction was made the backspace keystrokes would be echoed with the string '^H'. Of course, the final composed text would have no trace of the backspace characters (or the original erroneous text).

      Accidental writing under erasure occurs when using the Unix talk program to chat interactively to another user. On a PC-style keyboard most users instinctively press the backspace key to delete mistakes, but this may not achieve the desired effect, and merely displays a ^H symbol. The user typically presses backspace a few times before their brain realises the problem -- especially likely if the user is a touch-typist -- and since each character is transmitted as soon as it is typed, Freudian slips and other inadvertent admissions are (barring network delays) clearly visible for the other user to see.

      Deliberate use of ^H for writing under erasure parallels (and may have been influenced by) the ironic use of 'slashouts' in science-fiction fanzines.

      A related habit uses editor commands to signify corrections to previous text. This custom faded in email as more mailers got good editing capabilities, only to take on new life on IRCs and other line-based chat systems.

      charlie: I've seen that term used on alt.foobar often.
      lisa: Send it to Erik for the File.
      lisa: Oops...s/Erik/Eric/.

      The s/Erik/Eric/ says "change Erik to Eric in the preceding". This syntax is borrowed from the Unix editing tools ed and sed, but is widely recognized by non-Unix hackers as well.

  143. The iPod's newest market: the underclass by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Well put, Tygerfish: the iPod advertises more than one's faith in Apple products. It's a pricey status symbol, a digital pherenome that smells like moolah, affluence, sex.

    Heh: there's just one problem about sending such messages in a volatile society, especially when you can't hear what's going on around you. The distance from preening signifier to damn easy pickings is much shorter than many realize.

    Put these ingredients together--frontin' hipsters oblivious to their environment, the anger and hunger of the street, and the value of the iPod both as tech and music motherload--and it's probably poised to replace car stereos as the quickest score a thief can make.

  144. Nobody has mentioned ..... by cyberworm · · Score: 1

    The iPods value. The device itself is 300-500$ US. What about the value of the music? Is an iPod more valuable with music pre-loaded onto it? ATM I've got ~5000 songs on mine, which if I had gotten them all from iTunes would have cost me a few pennies. Granted I've still got the music at home on my fileserver (like a good little nerd) but if someone steals it, aren't they getting my 5000$ worth of music for themselves also?

    What about the time it takes to load over 5000 tracks onto an iPod. The only firewire port I have in this house is on my laptop and it's a mini 1394 which isn't powered. On top of that I had to deal with a bottleneck of getting all of my music across the network to my iPod, constantly having to recharge it after it died after ~30 minutes of transferring. Certainly investing a couple of days loading my iPod would only increase the value of it (or what I could claim as a loss) if it were ever stolen. Right? ...ahem... excuse me while I go write down my serial number.....

  145. Oooooooh well. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1
    I was walking down the street in Autlan de Navarro the other day, wearing my fashionable white headphones, when a one of the locals came up and asked me, "Llevas un iPod?" (which means, "Are you carrying an iPod?") I said, "Si senor," (which means, "Yes, sir") and he proceeded to pull out a sawed off 12 gauge shotgun, and demanded that I hand over the iPod. I did, and he ran the other way.

    Ok, I'm just kidding... I was visiting my aunt over there, and even if I had an iPod, they probably wouldn't know what it is down in Autlan de Navarro. (And they don't saw off perfectly good shotguns either.)

  146. Muggings don't happen in America? by FunWithHeadlines · · Score: 1
    "thats why muggings dont happen in America."

    What part of New York City are you not from?

  147. How about a defib? by AgentPhunk · · Score: 1
    I work for a company that makes defibrillators (as in: PADDLES, "CLEAR!!", ***BZZZT** )

    I think these would be the geek choice of anti-assailant devices if only those pesky robbers would just stand still long enough for us to put the pads on their chest.

  148. Chop shops for iPods? by Rufosx · · Score: 1

    Stolen cars aren't pawned, they're chopped.

    Pawn shops are typically obligated by law to report serial numbers of pawned goods to the local police (not that they always do, but...)

  149. Re:Fun -- Don't need the fake iPod by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    One fake iPod case: $50.

    How about one useless iPod after the battery has died: $1.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  150. Re:LOL by HoneyBunchesOfGoats · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I find it interesting that someone modded you interesting.

  151. descartes by plasm4 · · Score: 1

    Ipod therefore I am?

  152. DIE DIE DIE! by ravenspear · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If a thief tries to take my iPod, I'll just bludgeon them to death with it.

  153. More Guns, Less Crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    http://www.press.uchicago.edu/Misc/Chicago/493636. html

  154. I was mugged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Out for a late night walk, with my idiot self packing $500 in cash for no good reason, a couple of young thugs who had bicycles stowed away in a nearby yard came out to "greet" me.

    The oldest one started by punching the back of my head REALLY hard -- I saw a flash of blue light. The other younger ones started laying into my back, while the oldest one had taken out a nice sharp razor and drew a long (shallow) cut down along by back, tearing my flesh, along with my treasured Debian polo shirt.

    I don't remember which one managed to get me on the ground, but once I was down, the kicking began. I was kicked all over my body, in my face, back of my head, everywhere. I was begging for them to stop long enough so I could just get my money out and hand it over to them. I managed to get my wallet out and threw the cash on the ground. They snatched it up, jumped on their bikes and rode off, leaving me in a bloody mess on the road side.

    Even as the cars drove by, no one stopped to help, so I had to walk the rest of the way home to treat my wounds. I immediately called the police who nabbed the boys within 15 minutes. The younger ones were given house arrest, probation, and community service. They were 12-17. The oldest one, the 18 year old who incited the rest of them, was charged with assault with a deadly weapon and a few more charges. He was given 3 years. Yeah, a couple of kids doesn't sound like much to fight, but when there's five of them against one of you, and you know there's at least one weapon, you don't even try to fight back unless you want to die.

    The police got my money back, and ThinkGeek even replaced my Debian shirt for free, but to this day I still carry a subconscious fear of walking around even safe neighborhoods in daylight, and no matter how hard I try to fight it off, when I'm out and see a group of 5 black teenage boys together, my muscles tighten up just a bit more than normal.

    No, you definitely do not want to be mugged. This happened to me over 3 years ago and I'm still shaking off the fear.

    1. Re:I was mugged by Phekko · · Score: 1

      First off, IANAN (I am not a ninja, even though ninjas are sweet) but I know a bit about self defense. Not much, but a tad.

      On your average karate or whatnot basic 101 course they teach you a technique or two to be used against someone with a knife. My advice is: don't. Really. Don't. Just hand over your wallet and get over with it. Hopefully you'll lose only your money.

      Do the following: take a red marker. Wear something that doesn't bother you if it gets messed up. Have a buddy attack you with the marker, pretending it's a knife. Try to beat him without getting stained by the ink. A knife is bad, m-kay? A slash wound can potentially bleed you to death and a puncture wound will most probably hurt like hell or maybe even kill you very quick. Internal organs such as lungs, liver, spleen or the heart don't like punctures very much.

      I'm sorry, but in my opinion the best thing to do if a mugging occurs to you is to give your money and hope that's enough. No-one will help you (at least in most cases) and fighting against opponents that have very little to lose and may carry concealed (or non-concealed) weapons and who outnumber you is A Bad Idea(TM). You can buy a new IPod, but you can't buy extra lives for 25 cents in this game.

      --

      Sigs for Nerds. Sigs that Matter.
  155. No, no, no by Rew190 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So radio tags are bad because they track peoples' habits. Product activation is bad because it ties a product to a specific user. Global databases are bad because it's a violation of your privacy. However, when we are talking about your $300 iPod, then it's all good?

    DISCLAIMER: the logic in this post is based on my opinions.

    Answer: Yes, because the intended purpose would be for something the customer wants as opposed to what Big Brother would want. Chances are it would be an opt-in type thing if it was for the customers, and if it wasn't, THEN it would be a bad thing. However, Apple knows how to treat its customers and chances are they wouldn't intstitute anything like that.

    The difference with MS is that noone trusts them and chances are they'd force registering on all of their users if they were to kick something like that into gear.

  156. Re:It's okay. This is Texas. by Hwaguy · · Score: 1

    You could at least ask if they were feeling lucky. :P

  157. Second Degree Murder by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

    Not necessarily. If he doesn't know you have one, you give him the money, and then shoot him in the back as he's leaving.


    Then spend the rest of your life in jail. That is second degree murder. Unless he's walking away with the batteries to your pacemaker you're no longer in any immediate physical danger, so using lethal force amounts to murder.

    1. Re:Second Degree Murder by md358 · · Score: 1

      IANAL, nor live in America, but I'd think that it varies by state. Wish I had some reference but I've heard of shopkeepers running out of stores and shooting after robbers. Or maybe I'm just confusing TV with reality. I'm pretty sure you can at least shoot a bandit in most of the mid-west and south if he's on your property.

    2. Re:Second Degree Murder by martinthebrit · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, and some may say, shamefully, this is not the case in the UK.

      <polical highhorse>N.B. I don't support the automatic right to bear arms, but I do think the UK handgun ban is ridiculous and that citizens have a right to defend their property</political highhorse>

  158. This isn't a hard problem to solve by joeaggie · · Score: 1

    In Texas we have something called a concealed handgun license... My friend's brother had a knife pulled on him at a post office so he pulled out his gun and the would-be robber just ran away, he didn't even need to fire a shot :)

  159. Re: WA State by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You know, I'd really rather not kill someone. That's the sort of thing you'd have to deal with for the rest of your life. I'm pretty jaded, but I'd like to think that it would bother me a lot to take someone's life.

    Which is not to say that I wouldn't do it (or try to) if the need arised, I'd just like to avoid it.

    Anyone have a statistic on what percentage of armed robberies involve actual shooting/stabbing? And what percentage of those where it was because the victim resisted? I'll agree that you don't give in to a rapist, but if it's just property, give it up.

    Another question would be, do these robbers understand how to control a victim? If I rob you, you will not be able to pull a gun on me. I'll make sure you don't get the opportunity. If you try to do something, I'll use my weapon first. If you pull a gun, you'll probably die. As long as you behave and don't threaten me, I'm content just to wave my weapon at you.

    So, nonlethal weapons, assuming they disable the attacker, solve two problems: They leave the guy alive, and they don't escalate the situation as much. He's less likely to kill you if he doesn't think you can kill him, especially if he doesn't even recognize the weapon.

  160. Wattage, not voltage by DABANSHEE · · Score: 1

    The low end ones are 7 to 14 Watts, the higher end ones are 18 to 26 Watts.

    So obviously amps are coming into play here, well unless the watts are being upped simply by increasing voltage.

  161. Penalties for iPod Mugging by SamSpectre · · Score: 3, Funny

    Other than theft... It would be interesting (satisfying?) if the RIAA would bring the hammer down on these muggers for turning legit music into stolen music! Suddenly a petty crime would now get a $10,000 fine per song (or whatever the absurd fine is).

    1. Re:Penalties for iPod Mugging by m1chael · · Score: 1, Funny

      What would be more funny would be if the RIAA sued the victims for filesharing!

      --
      I know you are psychotic, but please make an effort.
  162. You can have my iPod... by ErnstKompressor · · Score: 1

    ...when you pry it from my cold dead... oh, wait a minute...

    --
    We apologise for the fault in this post. Those responsible have been sacked. -- Signed RICHARD M. NIXON
  163. muggage? by flacco · · Score: 1

    i just target them back for stabbage.

    --
    pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
  164. Bear Spray by jcsehak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's prolly illegal, but I imagine bear spray would stop just about anyone, if it would stop a charging grizzly.

    I was hiking once, and got near a mom and cubs (I saw a cub dart up a tree and heard a big thing coming through the brush). I took off the other way, pulling out my bear spray as I ran*. When I got it out, I turned around and saw nothing. The bear was just fronting a little. But I walked backwards for a while, away from that spot.

    Here's the point of my story: I realised that I had never even tested the thing to see if it worked. So I pointed it downwind (I'm not an idiot, but the wind was very slight), and let loose as short a burst as possible. Then, satisfied tha tit worked, I walked away -- upwind -- and a few seconds later had trouble breathing for the sharp peppery shit that burned my sinuses. It soon cleared up, but I couldn't imagine getting a facefull of that stuff. Seems like it'd stop anyone. Of course, I've never been up against anyone on PCP...

    *I later learned, there's literally a 1 in a million chance of getting mauled by a bear. You really don't need bear spray when you're hiking.

    --

    c-hack.com |
  165. Expect to see more of this by Tedium+Unleased · · Score: 1

    as the economy worsens. This kind of stuff is bound to happen when there are people walking around with frivilous music gadgets that cost more than most poor people's monthy rent payment. Good hunting.

  166. As a Mugger I can attest to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    My current take is about 37 iPods from stupid-stupid college kids.
    One sad fucker tried to fight back, as though his stupid toy was worth more than his life.
    Of course, a couple slugs to his now bloodpudding chest convinced him otherwise.

    See my e-bay auctions! iPods all capacities, even minis!

    Oh, by the way, I note that some of you nerds are just
    waiting for some "bad guy" to mug you so you can
    fight back for the sake of American Way, Jesus, and Apple Pie.
    To which I say: HAAAA HA HA HA HA HAAAAAAA.

  167. RIAA should offer protection by CherniyVolk · · Score: 3, Funny


    If they'll send a teenager to court for offering a gig or two of mp3s, surely they'll happily beat the life out of a mugger that steals 10-20-40GB of mp3s!

  168. Earbuds by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

    Yea I live in Toronto and the ear bud thing is definitly a fad. I`ve seen tonnes of people wearing whitish earbuds that aren`t standard Ipod ones.

    I just find it funny that people would spend $500 on an mp3 player then use the crappy provided headphones...

  169. Re:No problem; return the right of self-defence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Unfortunatly this would appear to be the typical attitude of so called UK 'Sports' Shooters. UK shooters sites such as Cybershooters (http://www.cybershooters.org/) and the Sportsman's Association (http://www.shootersweb.co.uk/boards/) apparently do little else but prompt agitation for RKBA among their members. Fortunatly this dangerous group of potential psychopathic killers were disarmed in 1997 after one of their number went AWOL in the school gymn in Dunblane.

  170. That's a pretty high level of sophistication. by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

    So in essence those doing the theivery have to keep up with technology to know the difference between something he can pawn off at $100 vs something he can pawn off at $2, if at all.

    I find that pretty hard to believe, since most thugs wouldn't know the difference between an ipod and a palm m105 until Rocco the fence told him to fuck off.

    --
    "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
  171. Size by littleghoti · · Score: 1

    Yeah, thats why they put them out in threes. Not because people have different needs. Surely if they wanted to show that the larger ipods were more desireable, they would make it obvious that there was a difference externally.

  172. Friendly Neighborhood Vigilante Audiophile Muggers by Cordath · · Score: 1

    They aren't just muggers. They're concerned audiophiles.

    Anybody who would spend $400 bucks on an audio player and then use the $5 stock buds (and I don't care what apple sells them for) that came with the player needs to be separated from said expensive player *immediately*. Watching someone use those crappy stock buds is like watching a 16-year old getting driving lessons in a Lamborghini Murcielago.

    If you're going to shell out for an iPod, get some real cans. It's the only way to defend yourself from the can-police, a.k.a. friendly neighborhood vigilante audiophile muggers.

    P.S. Those of you saying, "Hey, wait a minute! Those white buds are actually pretty good!" should go listen to a real set of cans right bloody now. Try some Grado's or, if you must have the ear-bud form factor, Shure's or Etymotics. (The last two are canal-phones, but decent ones, unlike the crap Sony and Apple make. Sony does make some nice cans, but their canal-phones suck.)

  173. poor mugger by Triv · · Score: 1

    He's gonna be royally annoyed if he tries to mug my ex-girlfriend - those bran' spankin' new white headphones're connected to a nine-dollar tape deck. :)

    Triv

  174. *WAS* urban legend by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

    Seriously, whether this was urban legend or not, it won't be any more.

    The iPod is a very expensive device. It is probably easy to fence -- it's selling like hotcakes, is in demand, and does not have permanent customizability features. If it follows the trend of audio devices rather than PDAs, it will depreciate slowly. It's a damn *good* idea to mug people with iPods.

  175. You can't shoot someone just for mugging you by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

    A civilian using deadly force against someone to prevent a crime involving nonlethal force (like stealing an iPod, car, wallet, etc) is illegal under almost all circumstances. Worse, if you managed to kill the guy, you could be looking at manslaughter or murder charges.

    Now, if the guy pulls a *knife* or a *gun*, you're free to let loose. However, if someone is three feet away from me, I'm not sure I'd want to try gambling on having a quicker draw (and being able to avoid being injured or killed by the return stab/shot).

    And shooting someone in the *back* as they run away with your iPod makes damning evidence against you WRT possibly managing to slip out on a self-defense exenoration ("I swear, it looked like he was going for a gun in his pocket"), because if he's running away, he just plain isn't a threat.

    I hate to say it, but if I were you, I'd want to think about going over some basic criminal law (like, law student 101 stuff...there's probably something distilled on the Internet for gun owners in your state). You could seriously screw yourself over with a felony conviction for doing something that you thought was perfectly kosher.

    1. Re:You can't shoot someone just for mugging you by n()_cHIEFz · · Score: 1
      I hate to say it, but if I were you, I'd want to think about going over some basic criminal law (like, law student 101 stuff...there's probably something distilled on the Internet for gun owners in your state). You could seriously screw yourself over with a felony conviction for doing something that you thought was perfectly kosher.
      Thanks for the tip, but...

      First off, you obviously don't live in Texas. You can shoot people for a lot of things there, including stealing your car (assuming they're on your property).

      Second, you're making a lot of assumptions about my personality and the way would react in a situation like this. You've never had any gun training or you would know that you aren't taught to shoot people in the *back* while they are running from you.

      There's nothing wrong with protecting yourself, whether it be hand-to-hand combat training, pepper spray, or a gun, but I will agree you have to be ready for the consequences of your actions (you might get hurt or killed, you may end up in jail). I'm certainly not the dipshit redneck you seem to think I am, and I don't think it's kosher to kill anyone.

      I'm not captain courageous vigilante out there kicking ass and shooting people who steal iPod's (or wallets whatever), but if someone attacks me, they may have to deal with me.

      Besides, for trying to steal my iPod, I think the appropriate punishment would be to shoot off his ears don't you... (a joke, just in case you were wondering)
      --
      -- Is it a right to remain ignorant? -- Calvin
    2. Re:You can't shoot someone just for mugging you by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      First off, you obviously don't live in Texas. You can shoot people for a lot of things there, including stealing your car (assuming they're on your property).

      Fair enough. Texas was actually the reason I used "*almost* all circumstances" -- there might be other states with exceptions, but Texas is the only one I know of. (Actually, I thought that Texas only let you do so during nighttime burglary and robbery, but looking up the actual text, it looks like it's much more broadly defined).

      Second, I didn't expect that you'd shoot someone in the back, but I had to mention it as part of covering all points -- the obvious issue during the crime is risk to yourself, and after the crime the legal issues. If you're in Texas, though, you can get away with it (I remember a case where a repo man was fatally shot in Texas while leaving a house with a car he had just repossessed. The attorney general refused to press charges. When asked what the repo man should have done differently, since he was simply carrying out his job, the AG gave the memorable quote "well, I guess he should have been faster.")

    3. Re:You can't shoot someone just for mugging you by n()_cHIEFz · · Score: 1

      If you're in Texas, though, you can get away with it (I remember a case where a repo man was fatally shot in Texas while leaving a house with a car he had just repossessed.

      Yea, I remember hearing about that case, and the laws in Texas are a bit extreme IMO.

      I'm not advocating shooting anyone and I agree that the average Joe shouldn't just go out and buy a weapon and attempt to defend himself with it. I've had hours of training (in the neighborhood of 700), even then you can only train yourself to a point to remain calm in those situations, and there is always the adrenaline factor. Most people can't remain clam and rational when being mugged.

      Honestly, if I were mugged while carrying my iPod and gun (which would never happen), most likely I would give up the iPod (only a 10GB model) and try as hard as possible to keep the mugger from getting my gun (worth about 3 times as much). But really, I don't carry a gun with me unless I'm headed to the range or out hunting. And my first instinct in any threatening situation is to look out for #1, not my iPod, I can always buy another one, but I'm priceless ;-)

      --
      -- Is it a right to remain ignorant? -- Calvin
  176. Pepper spray better than a gun by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

    Neal Stephenson makes a good point in Snow Crash -- pepper spray, in most situations, is more effective than a gun. You get hit in the face with pepper spray, you aren't going anywhere except for on the ground rubbing your eyes and yelling.

    That doesn't mean that a gun doesn't have a point -- just that its nonlethal buddy is frequently overlooked.

    1. Re:Pepper spray better than a gun by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      I don't think that pepper spray is necessary - I'm sure most people would listen to Reason.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
  177. Easy solution: by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    Ditch white headphones, switch to a single coiled silicone with a latex earplug. Put your finger on it every half a minute and mumble something.
    Add in dark glasses and a black suit.
    You'll never get mugged. Promise.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  178. The problem with pricy earbuds by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

    Spend $260 on a pair of Etymotic 4Ps and you won't listen to those POS white headphones again.

    Of course, then your life sucks when the cable gets damaged from you jogging with them in and it getting bent and tugged at...

  179. Re:No problem; return the right of self-defence by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    Crime in England then was a fraction of what it is now. Those were good times.

    Have you any evidence to back that up? I was never under the impression that Victorian England was a particularly great or crime-free place to live unless you happened to be rich.

    Then, were any footpad or highwayman so foolish as to attempt a robbery or other attack on one's person, he could be shot dead without the slightest risk of consequences (other than a pat on the back from the police.)

    Translation: If you were rich, you could shoot anyone under the pretence of self-defence and get away with it. If you were poor, you were likely to get hanged anyway, if you could actually afford a gun and the licence.

    Most criminals really ought to be killed by honest citizens, or by the state if necessary.

    Yeah, the justice system is reliable enough that we can do that.
    BTW, could we have anyone involved in (for example) forging evidence that resulted in someone being executed also be sentenced to death?

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  180. Re:No problem; return the right of self-defence by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    We used to be able to dump all the crooks out to austrailia too, that was a nice little number! I dont think everyone should be going around with guns doing the job of the police even if it is self defence, but i think we should be getting a bloody policeman on every corner instead of a stupid security camera. Waste of space, fuckwit kids who are just going to grow up to be criminals (well they already are) should be kicked right out of the country.

    That said it really would give me pleasure to shoot a couple of them down - too much pleasure maybe, so you just gotta restrain yourself.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  181. Re:No problem; return the right of self-defence by cruachan · · Score: 1

    You're of course absolutly correct in doubting the assertion about crime was a fraction of what it is now. The seminal work on this is "The Victorian Underworld" by Donald Thomas, which is a thoroughly entertaining and readable book as well as being highly informative.

    The fact is that the Victorian world was soaked in crime from top to bottom, particularly in the poorer neighbourhoods. Types of crimes may have differed, but the level of casual violence was much higher than it is now, and indeed things like child prostitution, which is abhored today as a near ultimate evil, were often regarded as little more than minor infringements of the law.

    Anyone who thinks that the Victorian era were 'good times' socially is either a mis-informed or ignorant numbskull, or decidedly of suspect character themselves.

  182. Seems unlikely... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    When a lot of people regularly carry about 150-400 mobile phones, often in their hands where they can be seen, it seems unlikely that the iPod would be an easier target. Also, an iPod requires knowledge of computers, the correct docking cable and software to work, where as a mobile phone only needs to be unlocked by the bloke at the market for a tenner. Mobiles are probably easier to sell on too.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  183. Great cowboy. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Pity in most parts of the civilized world that is not allowed.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  184. status symbols? by Vandil+X · · Score: 1

    My wife and I both have an iPod (I have the 10GB model, she has the newer 15GB model).

    We don't think of them as status symbols. We think of them as a way to take our music (organized via iTunes, our favorite music app) on the go. Not being fans of the WMA format also helped.

    We are by no means well-off financially. We just choose to spend our overtime money in fun ways.

    We also don't have the added expense of kids.

    When you're out of college, married, and doing the 8-5 thing, you gotta let yourself have a little fun before buying a house and settling down.

    --
    Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A, START
    1. Re:status symbols? by jonfelder · · Score: 1

      Let's see...you're married, went to college, and don't have kids.

      I'd say you're much more well-off financially than many.

      I'm certainly not insinuating that you're Donald Trump or something, but to say you aren't well-off financially is a load of crap.

      Single people with no education and a few kids are most likely not well off. If you can afford an iPod while meeting all your other financial obligations, you're doing ok.

  185. TT Eomer Reply! by mercuriser · · Score: 1

    War mongering? How long since Microsoft bought you? What was the promised price Grima? That when all the men were dead you would take the share of the treasure?

    Too long have you watched my ipod. Too long have you haunted her steps.

  186. iPod - What to wear when hostile and armed by grolaw · · Score: 1

    Texans, Floridians and all of the citizens of the other states that allow "concealed carry" now have a new accessory: an iPod.

    When feeling good and hostile, pack your piece (or two or three) and take a walk on the wild side. When the first Rock & Roll animal reaches for your 'pod, pop a cap in their a**.

    Of course, make certain that the "mugger" isn't another 'pod person just wanting to jack-in.

    Oh frabjous day! Callooh! Callay! We can kill at will with no thanks (or blame) to Bill! This IS the best of all possible worlds.

    Dr. Pangloss has reviewed my meds and I'm OK and you AREN'T.

    Where did I put that SIG 229 9mm with the BIG CLIP?

  187. West Midlands Massive by jamiguet · · Score: 1

    I live in Birmingham and I do not have an iPod however even if I had a 5 walkman I wouldn't be listening to it on the street. Wearing headphones in the West Midlands is asking fro trouble. I don't even pick up my mobile phone. If I am out and about, on the piss, I only carry cash and a single piece of id and my keys. That id Has not ogt my address on it it has my lat one. So no problems...

    I may be being over cuatious but I haven't had a single problem sinced I moved here.

    --

    Where is my mind?

  188. OT: Gun control... by Kjella · · Score: 1

    If guns are legal then muggers will have guns. If guns are illegal then muggers will have guns. Gun control laws insure that law-abiding citizens will be out-gunned by criminals.

    (...) Armed assailants have no advantage in a crowds where the average citizen is packing. (...) You can't get the draw on a crowd of people scattered around a bank lobby or convenience store when ordinary citizens are carrying concealed weapons.


    Are you saying they aren't outgunned in nearly every situation anyway? The muggers always get the bigger, better guns. Ok, here people use a pistol and no bullet proof vest vs. unarmed. In the US you have semi-/full-automatics w/vest and/or armor penetrating bullets against people with pistol/shotgun without.

    Muggers may wear assault armor to do a mugging. Noone will ever walk around in assault armor 24/7. Not even the muggers themselves. Not to mention the element of surprise, planning and coordination.

    That'll effectively stun even a large group because who'd like to draw first and make themselves the target? Drawing the attention of the whole group, the first guy has about as much chance as the first guy on the shores of Normandie on D-day.

    Not to mention, are you going to start a shooting war in a bank lobby with women and children? Between the criminals and the vigilantes, it'll be a bloodbath. Can you spell "human shields" or "hostages"?

    Cops don't always go storming in either. It's not without reason that cops have hostage negotiators or SWAT teams. Push people into a corner, and they *will* panick and start firing wildly. Even though he'll probably end up dead he can only be killed once, while his victims may be many....

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  189. Yup... by PurplePhase · · Score: 1

    sounds like chicken.

    Or was it one hand clapping?

    8-PP

  190. Re:Friendly Neighborhood Vigilante Audiophile Mugg by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

    Anybody who would spend $400 bucks on an audio player and then use the $5 stock buds (and I don't care what apple sells them for) that came with the player needs to be separated from said expensive player *immediately*. Watching someone use those crappy stock buds is like watching a 16-year old getting driving lessons in a Lamborghini Murcielago.

    For Chrissake, they are not an audiophile. They are listening to lossily-compressed MP3s. Any person that spends tons of money on expensive headphones for their iPod is not an audiophile, they're just looking for a damned status symbol. (IMHO most people that purchase iPods in the first place are looking for a status symbol, but such is life.)

  191. Re:Guns are dangerous. Duh! by Dimensio · · Score: 1

    And if the mugger got shot, that's a BAD thing?

    Actually, that's a great thing. The gun-grabbers get to add the shot mugger to their list of "gun violence statistics".

    If the mugger is 25 or under, it's also a "youth involved in gun violence".

  192. Re:Guns are dangerous. Duh! by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Guns make society safer? I don't think so.

    Absolutely they do. If gun ownership were outlawed, period, do you think that violent criminals are going to respect this law? of course not!

    Outlawing guns would be the worst thing that could possibly happen. All the criminals who wanted a gun to commit a crime would still have one, and all the law abiding citizens would be easy, unarmed targets.

    Gun ownership discourages violent crime.

    --
    I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
  193. Re:RegEx by DennisInDallas · · Score: 1

    s/Erik/Eric/
    is a regular expression.
    yes, sed & awk & ksh use the regEx engine...
    but so does perl and even that c# crap^H^H^H^Hstuff

  194. Re:RegEx by juhaz · · Score: 1

    Well, "s/foo/bar/" is a regex search/replace command in many things (the mentioned ed/sed/perl at least) but it's not really part of regular expressions per se.

    The match part in it is. I guess the replacement value would also be somehow since it allows those backreferences and the like.

  195. Re: My hat is off to you by jbarnum · · Score: 1

    This is without a doubt the FUNNIEST thing I have ever seen on Slashdot. I had tears in my eyes while I was reading this.

  196. Re:iPod = lame by diez · · Score: 1

    How is the iPod lame? I mean you're entitled to your opinion, but it's just so convinient!

    --
    -_-
  197. The facts on Tazers by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

    A little solid footing for the tazer croud :
    A tazer can do about three different things, all of which are intended to see you off to live and enjoy another day.

    1. Display of force - in addition to the two prongs that transmit electricity to the bad guy, there are two other prongs that point at each other on the front of the unit. Push the button when the tazer isn't connected to someone and the charge builds up and arc's across these two prongs. Makes a fairly loud snap crackle pop noise and a pretty blue spark. If you do this you are letting the 'bad guy' know you are about to zap him and maybe he will run away.

    2. If that didn't work (it would work on me - see ya) you can zap someone with it - turn it on and try to tag them with it. Hurts like hell and the involuntary reaction is to pull away from you. Pretty much like getting touched with the end of a cigarette. This isn't going to drop somebody.

    3. If that didn't work you can try to drop the 'bad guy' with it. This requires putting the two prongs to his flesh on his body core (neck or chest) for roughly 5 seconds. Imagine taking the head of a rattlesnake with two fangs sticking out the front and jabbing it into someone's chest or neck and keeping it connected for a full 5 seconds while they are flailing and trying to get you off of them. Same thing. Zapping someone for a quick ping on the arm isn't going to do it. 5 seconds, on the core.

    The reason this works when cops do it is because there are two other copy holding you down while the third one calmly zaps you in the neck or chest for a 5 count or until you stop moving. Or until he feels like stopping.

    Yes, a tazer can render someone physically invalid for a while, but it isn't an instant thing and it isn't an easy thing to do. It is more of a psychological weapon than anything, as in 'yea I want your iPod but there are easier iPods to steal than from Mr Psychotic Electrocute-my-ass here.'

    I wonder if the whole 'mug people with white earplugs' thing is a problem in Texas. I'm guessing not, what with the whole 'concealed carry' thing they have down there.

    --
    Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
  198. Dr Freud for you on line one ... by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

    Jamiguet said : Wearing headphones in the West Midlands is asking fro trouble.

    Ok if that wasn't a Freudian slip, I don't know what is. Nowhere in the article did it say the muggers were black.
    I'm not disagreeing with you, but shhh! we are supposed to be subtle when we are not being politically correct. Didn't you get the memo?

    --
    Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer