Slashdot Mirror


Swedish Carbon-Fiber Stealth Ship Runs NT

tiled_rainbows writes "The Guardian has an article today about the Swedish navy's new stealth warship, which they claim is the largest carbon-fiber vessel ever built. Slashdotters will be interested to learn that the ship runs Windows NT. The article says 'While the point-and-click system is popular with conscripts, the ship was fitted with a wooden ship's wheel at the insistence of senior officers. If Windows goes down, they will still be able to steer.' Which raises the question: where can I get a USB-compatible wooden ship's wheel for my computer?"

526 comments

  1. In other news... by trp642 · · Score: 5, Funny

    US Navy develops new Sasser Torpedo to protect us from Swedish terrorists. Bush feels they are hiding WMD's. Swedish Chef is quoted as saying "We no heeden dur Weaponden den Massen destructnueden. bork! bork! bork!".

    1. Re:In other news... by websaber · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Just a thought, will broadcasting sasser on wifi frequencies become a effective combat technique against sweden? Then again sweden doesn't fight much so I guess their not worried.

      --
      "A good friend will bail you out of jail. A true friend will be sitting next to you saying, 'damn....that was fun!'"
    2. Re:In other news... by gcore · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      In Sweden, they speak swedish, not bad german.

    3. Re:In other news... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Only if they've got wifi receivers.

      Any known way of externally communicating with that box is a risk, though. Otherwise it's like an isolated network staffed with trusted personell.

    4. Re:In other news... by MrTaz65 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh come on, that was beautiful swedish chef and you know it. You're just jealous.

    5. Re:In other news... by ArCaNe50 · · Score: 0

      OMG LOL that is funny. Or better yet maybe someone will make a mod chip so they can run linux on it.

    6. Re:In other news... by cablepokerface · · Score: 0

      Oh man ... I had to wait 2 minutes till i could type again ...

      What are you trying to do, kill me?

    7. Re:In other news... by RatRagout · · Score: 1

      The "bluescreen of death" will finally get a literal meaning

    8. Re:In other news... by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      This will surely bolster Sweden's stealth political influence in world affairs.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    9. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bork! Bork! BorK! BorK!Ick schvinder hinder stvealthen shvippen:)OHH No BLUE SKREEN OF DESS..fvuck!:)

    10. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahaha don't do that. i'm reading this in a quiet office. when i shouldn't be reading this.

    11. Re:In other news... by moro_666 · · Score: 1

      as from the historical view (who was first)
      german is really some screwed up swedish and not the other way around.

      anyway, what's the language flamebite about, getting negative modpoints or just making people
      who want to read tech specific comments scroll around more ?

      --

      I'd tell you the chances of this story being a dupe, but you wouldn't like it.
  2. I got your USB ships wheel right here, pal. by YankeeInExile · · Score: 5, Informative

    I realize you were being cutesy, but making a USB ships wheel sounds about like a one-weekend take-it-apart-and-put-it-together project, starting with a shaft-encoded driving-game controller.

    The hardest part would surely be building the binnacle.

    --
    How does the Slashdot Effect happen given that no slashdotters ever RTFA?
    1. Re:I got your USB ships wheel right here, pal. by Dav3K · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Like hell, you say. Show me one shaft-encoded driving game controller that comes anywhere near the size or strength this would have to be to support the wheel. I agree with you in that the technical principles would be identical, but the scale here would require things to be built on a much larger (read: heavy duty) scale and out of much stronger materials. (substitute plastic with metals)

    2. Re:I got your USB ships wheel right here, pal. by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You know, the sensor doesn't need to support the wheel :-)

      Skipping the driving controller, you might do better to dismantle a $2.99 optomechanical USB mouse for its optical sensor and USB interface.

    3. Re:I got your USB ships wheel right here, pal. by magefile · · Score: 1

      Or support the wheel - have the "axle" go through support struts (rods with cradles or rings at the top that the axle rests in/on top of) before going into into the controller. You could even add gears to scale things up/down if you decided you wanted that. Or maybe have the axle supported by struts, and a belt mechanism to turn the controller. Like most autopilots have, but in reverse. I think this is what the guy meant when he said the binnacle would be the hardest part to build.

    4. Re:I got your USB ships wheel right here, pal. by YankeeInExile · · Score: 2

      who ever said anything about supporting the wheel on the shaft encoder? The idea I had, upon first reading the article was something like this: Picture of wheel

      --
      How does the Slashdot Effect happen given that no slashdotters ever RTFA?
    5. Re:I got your USB ships wheel right here, pal. by fsck! · · Score: 4, Informative

      And then there's the issue that NT doesn't even support USB.

    6. Re:I got your USB ships wheel right here, pal. by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Screw USB. This isn't 1998. Now, show me a Bluetooth captain's wheel, and I'll be a happy man!

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    7. Re:I got your USB ships wheel right here, pal. by slickwillie · · Score: 4, Funny

      I hope it works better than that single dial thingy that BMW has.

      "I said thirty degrees port, not turn on the music!"

    8. Re:I got your USB ships wheel right here, pal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      A grey code printed disk and a couple of LED transmitter/receiver pairs would do the trick (been there, done that, but for a different application -- angle of a 300 pound stainless steel disk holding silicon wafers).

      -- ac at work

    9. Re:I got your USB ships wheel right here, pal. by westlake · · Score: 1

      The wheel of a modern combat vessel is surprisingly small: USS Harry Truman.

    10. Re:I got your USB ships wheel right here, pal. by the+chao+goes+mu · · Score: 1

      Or even a standard mouse. Attach the sensor wheels to the wheel's axle.

      --
      Boys from the City. Not yet caught by the Whirlwind of Progress. Feed soda pop to the thirsty pigs.
    11. Re:I got your USB ships wheel right here, pal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The hardest part would surely be building the binnacle."

      And the barnicle

    12. Re:I got your USB ships wheel right here, pal. by davebarz · · Score: 1

      Screw Bluetooth. This isn't 2002. Now, show me a USB captain's wheel, and I'll be a happy man!

    13. Re:I got your USB ships wheel right here, pal. by DjMd · · Score: 1

      Hey look somebody already made one. And check out the game they are playing. Those graphics looks so 1990.

      --
      DJMD - The fourth man - Planetary
    14. Re:I got your USB ships wheel right here, pal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the barnacle.

    15. Re:I got your USB ships wheel right here, pal. by AnyoneEB · · Score: 2, Funny

      It doesn't? I'm running Windows NT v5.1.2600 and it supports my USB devices fine, as does Windows NT v5.0. I've never used a machine running Windows NT v4 or lower, so I do not know anything about its USB support.

      --
      Centralization breaks the internet.
    16. Re:I got your USB ships wheel right here, pal. by fsck! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Isn't "NT 5.1.x" more commonly known as Windows XP? I know that "ver" under Windows 2000 reports 5.00.2195. When people talk about what "NT" supports, they usually mean "NT 4.0" or in rare occasions, "NT 3.51."

    17. Re:I got your USB ships wheel right here, pal. by pVoid · · Score: 1
      If you call yourself a geek, then you wouldn't be arguing about this business jargon.

      It's like if someone said "Linux 2.4 kernel? Bah, I run RedHat *8*... you are backward."

    18. Re:I got your USB ships wheel right here, pal. by fsck! · · Score: 1

      I recognise the difference between kernel and distribution, which is exactly why I called it XP. 2000 was adopted so readily because Microsoft chose not to support USB on NT 4.0. That's part of the reason why 2000 has so much staying power; there isn't any hardware AFAIK that works on XP but not 2K.

      I seriously doubt anyone is running the NT shell on the XP kernel or vice versa.

      Compare that to the free alternatives. It's not unthinkable that someone might be running the 2.6 kernel on a Slackware install from 18 months ago. Referring to XP and NT 5.1.x is asinine and complicates things needlessly.

      Geeks communicate as effeciantly as possible. There's business jargon, and then there's being pragmatic.

    19. Re:I got your USB ships wheel right here, pal. by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      an optomechanical mouse is a standard mouse, the optical portion is in slotted disks, spun by rollers in contact with the mouse ball.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    20. Re:I got your USB ships wheel right here, pal. by pVoid · · Score: 1
      I'm not launching missiles at you, but my point is that the source of the quote "it uses NT" comes from the Guardian.

      It is as accurate a quote as 3 is an accurate representation of Pi.

      On a side note though, being a NT afficiando myself (from the early days on), I've never ceased calling the kernel by its name "NT" in all the windows out there.

      In fact, the windows family branches in two: Consumer Windows (95/98/Me) and NT (NT/2k/XP/2k3). I still call my system 'NT' to people who know me and understand where I come from (that is programmers and sysadmins).

      So I wouldn't be surprised if such a comment made the term NT appear on that report.

      Also, I would *highly* doubt they would still be using the 4.0 kernel at this point in time. It's going out of support and frankly, it has a lot of documented bugs. The newer kernels are MUCH more robust.

    21. Re:I got your USB ships wheel right here, pal. by pyrrhonist · · Score: 1
      starting with a shaft-encoded driving-game controller

      They say this cat shaft-encoded is a bad mother
      SHUT YOUR MOUTH!
      I'm talkin' 'bout shaft-encoded.
      THEN WE CAN DIG IT!

      Sorry, had to be done.

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    22. Re:I got your USB ships wheel right here, pal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screw bluetooth and USB, this isn't 2003. Show me a wireless firewire captain's wheel :)

    23. Re:I got your USB ships wheel right here, pal. by zero_offset · · Score: 1

      the source of the quote "it uses NT" comes from the Guardian

      Exactly. And I'm willing to bet The Guardian doesn't "call itself a geek". They meant NT4.

      NT is still in widespread use within the US military (a few of my friends do various types of computer-related military contract work), so it wouldn't surprise me if that was the case in other large militaries as well.

      Nobody inside Microsoft has referred to anything but the early betas of Win2K as NT since NT4. I know a lot of those people and talk to them about this kind of thing on a regular basis. If you said NT to anybody inside Microsoft, they would instantly assume you mean NT4, and nothing else.

      And you're wrong about the branching of the Windows product line. There are four branches these days -- Home, Server, Enterprise and Data Center. Most people would assume the last three are really just marketing-speak, but there are very large groups fully dedicated to each of the four branches. To MS, the separation is quite real.

      I did, however, get a laugh out of your RedHat 8 joke. I actually overheard that awhile back here at the office (various MS geeks went through a spasm of "switching" to Linux -- and mostly switched back).

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

    24. Re:I got your USB ships wheel right here, pal. by Balp · · Score: 1

      With military technology I would dout that They have NT4 yet the ship is probaly still using NT3.5. (Yes I have worked as a contractor for a company making connuniction equipment for the Swedish air force, that still today uses Motorola 68xxx chips.) And we are talking about a morden et fighter.

      / Anders

    25. Re:I got your USB ships wheel right here, pal. by pVoid · · Score: 1
      And you're wrong about the branching of the Windows product line.

      I beg to differ. I can understand that there are different teams working on the product lines, but Microsoft has two kernels: Consumer Windows (9x/Me) and the NT kernel (3.51/4.0/5.0/5.1). Those are the two main branches.

      Only after that, in the NT kernel branch, do you have a division of Home, Server, Enterprise and DC.

      And that is my point. The term "NT kernel" isn't equivalent with Windows NT 4. I don't care how many people you know at microsoft, the fact remains that all current windows products are "NT based".

    26. Re:I got your USB ships wheel right here, pal. by zero_offset · · Score: 1

      They absolutely are NT-based. But they are not NT, and no one refers to them that way. THAT was the point you tried to make -- that when the article said the ship ran NT, it could be Win2K or some later OS. Your assumption was false. Those operating systems simply are not COMMONLY referred to as "NT" by anyone in my experience -- which is broad.

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

    27. Re:I got your USB ships wheel right here, pal. by pVoid · · Score: 1
      Ok, let's back down to our initial statements, about Redhat 8 and Linux Kernel 2.4...

      In that context, if I told you, a reporter, that my system was "NT based" without giving any more precisions than that, are you saying I could absolutely positively not mean Windows 2000?

    28. Re:I got your USB ships wheel right here, pal. by zero_offset · · Score: 1

      Nobody said "NT based" except you.

      If you went to the trouble to say "NT based" instead of NT, I might wonder if you meant something other than NT4. If you just said "NT", as the article did, then yeah, I'd assume you meant NT4, and so would everyone else in the IT biz that I've met or known in the past several years.

      Forget it.

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

    29. Re:I got your USB ships wheel right here, pal. by pVoid · · Score: 1
      No I won't forget it, you have walked around the bush 720 degrees and forgotten the point of the whole topic: the Guardian isn't a technical source. Their interviewee probably told their reporter "our system is NT based", and the Guardian just went ahead and said "oh it's NT".

      My point from post 1 was: we're geeks here on slashdot, we should know better than to assume that just because the Guardian said "NT", it's litterally NT 4.0.

    30. Re:I got your USB ships wheel right here, pal. by zero_offset · · Score: 1

      And you've gone from idle speculation to actually inventing dialogue. Nice.

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

    31. Re:I got your USB ships wheel right here, pal. by pVoid · · Score: 1
      Nice is your looming into the abyss of trolldom.

      You're actually amusing me. Please continue your pissing contest.

  3. USB? Hazza! by Ckwop · · Score: 5, Funny

    Where can I get a USB-compatible wooden ship's wheel for my computer

    I doubt it's USB since NT4 doesn't support USB.. :P Probably PS2 or a Serial connector :)

    Simon

    1. Re:USB? Hazza! by krymsin01 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I really doubt it's anything like that, since they wanted it to be able to steer in case windows went down. As for where you could get something like that, I'm sure you could put some sort of tracking pattern on the axle of the wheel, then mount a USB optical mouse in a fixed position to track it. Viola.

      --
      stuff
    2. Re:USB? Hazza! by AceCaseOR · · Score: 1

      You sure it's NT 4? 2000 uses NTFS and it has USB support. Personally, I'm suprised they used a wooden wheel. IIRC, the majority of warships now have metal ship's wheels for steering.

      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
    3. Re:USB? Hazza! by jwhyche · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Tradition. If anything navy's love is tradition. I'm willing to be that had a lot to do with the decition to use a wooden wheel.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    4. Re:USB? Hazza! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if the cable comes loose, you have to reboot the ship to make it work again?

    5. Re:USB? Hazza! by grub · · Score: 4, Funny


      Reminds me of the old Winston Churchill quote:
      "Traditions! What traditions? Rum, sodomy and the lash!"

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    6. Re:USB? Hazza! by Analogy+Man · · Score: 2, Insightful

      More likely the wheel is physically linked the steering gear train. The operation would be kind of like the player pianos with moving keys. If someone chose to revert to manual there would not be a reliance on the computer for steering.

      --
      When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.
    7. Re:USB? Hazza! by Throtex · · Score: 5, Funny

      All Winston Churchill quotes are 'old'. I'd surely be impressed if he were making any new ones.

    8. Re:USB? Hazza! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the Hell kind of USB are you using buddy?

    9. Re:USB? Hazza! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Bah, good point. :)

    10. Re:USB? Hazza! by fizban · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or as they're saying today:
      "Traditions! What traditions? Rumsfeld, sodomy and the lash"

      --

      +1 Insightful, -1 Troll. What can I say, I'm an Insightful Troll.

    11. Re:USB? Hazza! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Voila, goddammit. How hard is that to remember? It's not like it's neuroscience.
      (Not aimed at you, personally, just a frustrated rant)

      I mean, apart from my father's* tongue, I can still juggle German, French and English...

      (*=Don't speak my mother's tongue)

    12. Re:USB? Hazza! by dpilot · · Score: 1

      RATS! My mod points just expired within the last half-hour.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    13. Re:USB? Hazza! by calags · · Score: 2, Funny

      And no cannibalism.

      "There is no cannibalism in the British Navy, absolutely none, and when I say none, I mean there is a certain amount."

      --
      Never attribute to stupidity what can be construed as a monopoly preservation tactic.
    14. Re:USB? Hazza! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I doubt it's USB since NT4 doesn't support USB.. :P

      The wheel isn't connected to the NT machines, as it says it is for use even if the NT machines fail.

      Obviously the USB ship's wheel is connected to the Linux-powered engineering computers.

    15. Re:USB? Hazza! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      obviously not, or they'd have specifically mentioned linux.

      IE: Yeah, we've got the thing connected to some OS that I wouldn't touch cause, well, it's interface is downright unfriendly

    16. Re:USB? Hazza! by four12 · · Score: 1

      According to this, that quote isn't from Sir Winston.

    17. Re:USB? Hazza! by orcrist · · Score: 1

      :-)
      This joke can hardly be improved (in both humor and insight), but how about 'leash' instead of 'lash'?

      -chris

      --
      San Francisco values: compassion, tolerance, respect, intelligence
    18. Re:USB? Hazza! by Dravik · · Score: 1

      It is most probably NT. Most of the computers in the US navy are still on NT also. In within the last month they required a unit to have NT with service pack 3 on a unit from my company.

      --
      The purpose of language is communication, If the idea is clear the grammar ain't important
    19. Re:USB? Hazza! by Raven42rac · · Score: 1

      Or even a parallel connector. "I need to print something, unplug the wheel!"

      --
      I hate sigs.
  4. Pst, hey sweeden... by krymsin01 · · Score: 1

    Watch out for the winnuke...

    --
    stuff
  5. Does the ship support OGG? by sinergy · · Score: 1, Funny

    If not, they should really work on their compatibility.

    --
    ...
  6. BSOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    THe bluescreen sunk my battleship!

    1. Re:BSOD by cmanuh · · Score: 1

      consipiracy theorest: the US instructed microsoft to install a trojan so they can crash the ship at will.

    2. Re:BSOD by TheCabal · · Score: 1, Funny

      And a kernel panic sunk mine. We're even-steven.

      Please patch and recompile your humor binary. It's a bit dated.

    3. Re:BSOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And all navy ships are grey because?

    4. Re:BSOD by JHawk24821 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ships are gray because they are meant to blend in with the skyline, not the water's surface (in response to the post above, saying blue was a good color). Subs using periscopes would spot a blue boat against a grayish sky in a second.

    5. Re:BSOD by subtropolis · · Score: 1

      I suspect that any enemy of theirs would eventually learn to wait for the blue glow from the cockpit to give them away.

      --
      "Our interests are to see if we can't scale it up to something more exciting," he said.
    6. Re:BSOD by StuckInSyrup · · Score: 1

      2 possible scenarios:

      1. captain: FIRE!
      dialog box: do you really want to aply the main gun on the incoming missile? this action can cause the missile to stop functoning.

      2. captain: FIRE!
      dialog box: gun driver not installed.

      --
      Ni.
  7. Doesn't really matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    All sailors do all day is participate in a giant bog hog

    1. Re:Doesn't really matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no unreal 2004?

    2. Re:Doesn't really matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm Swedish, and wonder if you are too. Or has the English language really been enriched with another Swedish word - "böghög"?
      (="gay pile", "pile of faggots")

  8. Stealth? NT?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Not very stealthy.. all those loud bleeps every time they reboot each hour.

    1. Re:Stealth? NT?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, my NT box doesn't crash. oh yeah, I forgot, you're a troll

    2. Re:Stealth? NT?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and yet plenty of other BSOD stuff, trolling too, gets +5 :o)

  9. Movie idea by BorgDrone · · Score: 5, Funny

    This gives me a great idea for a movie: "Speed 3: Dead in the water".

    1. Re:Movie idea by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Informative

      You joke, but the USS Yorktown didn't think it was so funny. :-P

    2. Re:Movie idea by JamesP · · Score: 1

      Spped 3: Your boat will shut down in 60 seconds.

      Ooops!

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
    3. Re:Movie idea by stratjakt · · Score: 3, Informative

      But the Yorktown went down due to expirimental software they were screwing with, ie; it was the userland stuff that THEY WROTE that crashed. They were testing some new code, and it didnt work. Read your own link, as biased as Wired is they can't hide that fact.

      "The Smart Ship program is still in development, and officials said glitches are to be expected, but in this case the problem appeared to be more political than technical. Using Microsoft's Windows NT operating system in such a critical environment, some engineers said, was a bad move."

      See, shit like that is stretching to blame someone else, common practice in government contracts. But MSFT didn't write the "Smart Ship" program. Who are the "some engineers"? I bet "some other engineers" said it probably didn't matter what OS was running.

      The rest of the article tries to go into the awesomeness of unix, as though it would have made everything magically OK, but the problem is clearly defined here:

      "They rushed this stuff on the ship, there was no real prototype, and then they tried to make things work as they went along"

      Thats a simple recipe for disaster no matter what OS you choose.

      Of course, this is slashdot so its got to be MSFT's fault.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    4. Re:Movie idea by larkost · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The issue was that they divided by 0, and the resultant crash bubbled up and crashed the os on a network controller, in turn taking a whole group of systems down with it. While the proprietary systems triggered the crash, it should not have gone so far, so the OS does bear some responsibility.

      This should never have been run on a non-real-time operating system. So not NT, not Linux, not MacOS, etc...

    5. Re:Movie idea by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They must have divided by 0 in kernel space to bomb the OS.

      NT get chosen for stuff like this because it's easier for them to support special hardware by writing and maintaining drivers, not a particular monolithic kernel that slashbots would recommend.

      Frankly, who cares. This would be a story about some really cool tech (an enormous, "invisible" boat) but instead its an OS flamewar.

      Bah, slashdot isn't a "news for nerds" or a "geek" site anymore, it's just a soapbox for OSS philosophy.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    6. Re:Movie idea by kev0153 · · Score: 1

      Yep, the new Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle for the Marine Corps uses some version of windows not sure which. I was crawling around in one the other day and saw the "3D pipe" screensaver on one of the displays.

      If you get a chance watch some of the video clips of the 30mm gun testing.

    7. Re:Movie idea by Locutus · · Score: 1

      which brings up the question of what good is a wooden wheel( steerable ship ) if the propulsion system doesn't work?

      Maybe they want to look good at the wheel as they go down with the ship. ;-)

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    8. Re:Movie idea by Locutus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ask the CSX Railroad company how smart they think they are for using Windows for their signal system? Yes, the same signal system that was off-line for 1/2 a day because a MS virus/worm took the MS Windows-based system down.

      I've not read the full details of the big blackout in the NE a year or two ago but so far, I've not seen anything that says that the MSBlast worm did not bring it's LAN to it's knees and cause this. They do say that the monitoring systems message queues were backing up and caused that software to crash. That looks secondary to me since they've not said why it's messaging queues were backing up...

      Microsoft is a marketing company first and foremost and so their OS design is forced to follow that line of thinking. Use of their OS's in mission critical situations is the dumbest thing anybody can do IMHO.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    9. Re:Movie idea by orcrist · · Score: 1

      Bah, slashdot isn't a "news for nerds" or a "geek" site anymore, it's just a soapbox for OSS philosophy.

      I see you haven't gotten the obligatory "You're new here aren't you" reply yet so allow me:

      You're new here aren't you?

      -chris

      --
      San Francisco values: compassion, tolerance, respect, intelligence
    10. Re:Movie idea by reinard · · Score: 1

      If a virus can infest their system, (especially one that exploited a known and easily patchable vulnerability) they weren't taking care of it. The same holds true for any OS. You don't apply patches and fixes and _maintain_ your system, you will eventually run into problems like this. This has nothing to do with the choice of OS. A competently administered Windows box is fine in most scenarios.

      --
      Reinard
    11. Re:Movie idea by stratjakt · · Score: 2

      no, I'm old here.

      Once upon a time this article would have been about stealth technology on the high seas, going into tangents about the Philidelphia project and stuff.

      Now it's "who cares about the tech, MS is teh gheyer than aidz olllolol!"

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    12. Re:Movie idea by orcrist · · Score: 1

      Well, to be fair, there is also discussion going in that direction (see my other post on stealth vs. sonar)... but come on - Slashdot has always been a place where anti-MS sentiment was quite at home; or at least since I started reading it which *appears* to be somewhat earlier than you - and no I usually don't pull the low user number card, but it isn't entirely irrelevant to this off-topic topic.
      Of course, I was only joking anyway ;-)

      Cheers,
      Chris

      --
      San Francisco values: compassion, tolerance, respect, intelligence
  10. Wooden Steering Handle Protocol Mismatch by Colourspace · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think you'll find that the next M$ version of the wooden ship steering wheel will actually require FireWire bandwidth to run...

  11. The stealth effect is kind of ruined by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Funny

    The stealth effect is kind of ruined, however, when this Swedish ship tries to sneak through the fog at night, but the cook is happily cooking tomorrow's pastries exclaiming "Bork Bork Bork!", which echoes over the waves.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  12. Sinking squared by SilverGiant · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who knew--a ship that could crash twice.

    1. Re:Sinking squared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      The question is, do the rats get back on board once it has been rebooted?

    2. Re:Sinking squared by TechniMyoko · · Score: 0

      sorry troll, NT (in this case being XP or 2K since everyone's been saying NT does have USB support) is quite stable

    3. Re:Sinking squared by pottymouth · · Score: 3, Informative

      Unless they try to print to a network printer that's not available. That very thing caused my currently patched XP Pro box to blue screen in a repeatable way (which is supposed to be impossible). I've had a similar problem printing a PDF (on an available network printer) with Windows 2000.

      Not exactly the type of thing that we want taking a war ship down....

      Besides, Penguins and water go together!!

    4. Re:Sinking squared by Foolhardy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What makes you so sure it is Windows's fault, and not some crappy printer drivers? Which printer are you using?

    5. Re:Sinking squared by hexhacker · · Score: 1

      I treeed tu preent tu un unefeeeleble-a netvurk preenter oon XP Pru oonce-a. Ell I gut ves a blooe-a screee. Su I deceeded tu poot thet demn sheep's cumpooter tu better use-a, es a cootteeng buerd. Su fer, su guud.
      Bork Bork Bork!

      --
      ----- Serious people have few ideas. People with ideas are never serious. - Paul Valery
    6. Re:Sinking squared by bkhl · · Score: 1

      Also, if I recall my airplane model building days, the carbon fiber will be hell to glue together after a crash.

    7. Re:Sinking squared by pottymouth · · Score: 1

      In the case of the unavailable networked printer and XP Pro I was using an HP Laser Jet III. Sort of a old, well established standard, wouldn't you say...

      In the case of Windows 2K and the PDF, I was printing to a Lexmark Laser (don't know the model) via an NT print server.

      The point I was trying to make is that it should be virtually impossible for a printer driver or spooler to take down the OS (under normal use). I'm obviously not an MS Windows fan but this really suprised me. I've had pretty good luck with Windows 2K (not so much with XP) and being able to repeatedly crash (I did it three times to prove it was consistent) the OS by printing a PDF just blew me away.

    8. Re:Sinking squared by randomencounter · · Score: 1

      Since when can printer drivers bring the OS down?
      Aren't printer drivers done in userspace?

      --
      Forget diamonds, copyright is forever.
    9. Re:Sinking squared by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

      "What makes you so sure it is Windows's fault, and not some crappy printer drivers?"

      Either way it's proprietary software causing the problem.

    10. Re:Sinking squared by Foolhardy · · Score: 1

      Before NT4, printer drivers (and video drivers) were in user mode. Since NT4, MS decided to move the win32 subsystem into kernel mode (to reduce overhead), along with video drivers and some printer drivers. Printers are considered another type of video output device. Here is a Microsoft article about it.
      For stability, I wish they were all in user mode.

    11. Re:Sinking squared by Foolhardy · · Score: 1
      The point I was trying to make is that it should be virtually impossible for a printer driver or spooler to take down the OS (under normal use). I'm obviously not an MS Windows fan but this really suprised me. I've had pretty good luck with Windows 2K (not so much with XP) and being able to repeatedly crash (I did it three times to prove it was consistent) the OS by printing a PDF just blew me away.
      I agree that it is silly for a printer driver to be able to crash the entire system. I guess Microsoft wasn't thinking about stability when they moved most of win32 into kernel mode, along with some of the printer drivers. No, you don't want this happening in a critical application.

      My setup isn't the same as yours, but I tried to print to an unplugged usb hp deskjet 920c connected to an xp machine over the network from another xp machine, and it didn't blue screen. No errors either, it just sat in the print queue.
      Which computer is crashing? The print server or the workstation? How is the printer connected to the print server? Does the blue screen have a usefull message? (a record of it should be in the event log.)
    12. Re:Sinking squared by BillyBlaze · · Score: 1

      Because it's Windows's completely braindead design that requires print drivers to run in ring 0, and that requires you to install special drivers for a remote printer. Printer drivers should run in user space, and should provide a non-printer-specific API to the network.

  13. Jack Sparrow says... by elwell642 · · Score: 1, Funny

    that the ship runs Windows NT

    And really bad eggs.

    --

    <insert witty linux comment here>

  14. DaVinci Virus by z0ink · · Score: 2, Funny

    We require 20 million dollars or we will sink a series of oil ships .....

    --
    Steal This Sig
  15. Corvette by thedillybar · · Score: 3, Informative
    According to http://www.theta.com/csla/glossary.html:

    Corvette: A small, fast warship with light armament often used for anti-submarine warfare.

    1. Re:Corvette by Trigun · · Score: 5, Funny

      You missed the other definition: A $60,000 fiberglass and aluminium penis extension that gets 8 miles to the gallon.

    2. Re:Corvette by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually it's 19 city/28 highway.

    3. Re:Corvette by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess the thetans are going to be bringing a few of those against their aggressors? Does the American Psychiatric Society even HAVE any port locations?

    4. Re:Corvette by op00to · · Score: 2, Informative

      $60k? Try $44k, corvettes aren't that expensive. Even fully decked out, you're only talking $53k or so.

    5. Re:Corvette by dubious9 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah I was expecting something bigger ("biggest fibreglass boat!"), but I guess they don't need anything too huge.

      Anybody who wants to see a another good article about the ship, with lots of pictures, try, here.

      --
      Why, o why must the sky fall when I've learned to fly?
    6. Re:Corvette by WinterSolstice · · Score: 1

      Agree with the other posters. I have a 75 Stingray, and it still gets 12/18.

      New of course, they are still WAY under 60k.
      Mine was 10k, in top form. All original, all leather package, etc.

      Go back to your souped-Up type R Escort.

      -WS

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    7. Re:Corvette by w42w42 · · Score: 1

      I'm not in the navy, so I'll plead ignorance here. But doesn't 'Stealth' technology seem kind of wasted on what is essentially a mine layer? The article also said this corvette would be used for anti-submarine warfare - last I checked, subs use sonar, and are very rarely on the surface in a position to use radar.

      Question - does anyone know how difficult a hull breach would be to repair on a vessel with this material? I'd assume that dockyards are setup to weld repairs on std. naval craft, but this would be a new challenge I'm sure.

    8. Re:Corvette by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      someone woke up with their mullet in a twist this morning...

    9. Re:Corvette by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Really? I thought it was a mid-life crisis thing.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    10. Re:Corvette by Zcar · · Score: 1

      Mullets? Where's the Camaro owner?

    11. Re:Corvette by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL! And I mean it!

    12. Re:Corvette by b-baggins · · Score: 1

      Hull breach, nothing. How about putting the hull out when it catches fire?

      Anyone remember the asinine decision the Brits made to build their ships out of Aluminum? During the Faulklands war, an exocet missile hit one and the hull ignited. The ship was a total loss.

      The only good thing that came from that is it shut up the morons in America who wanted us to convert our ships to aluminum hulls as well.

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
    13. Re:Corvette by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone remember the asinine decision the Brits made to build their ships out of Aluminum? During the Faulklands war, an exocet missile hit one and the hull ignited. The ship was a total loss.

      Nobody can remember that, because it never happened.
      1. The towers were aluminum, not the hulls.
      2. It wasn't an exocet, but a 2000lb bomb. A bomb that would've destroyed a steel ship too.
      3. An exocet will destroy a steel ship too.

      http://www.hazegray.org/faq/smn6.htm#F7

    14. Re:Corvette by orcrist · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The article also said this corvette would be used for anti-submarine warfare - last I checked, subs use sonar, and are very rarely on the surface in a position to use radar.

      Well I have to admit I didn't read this article so I don't know if the article talks about what kind of stealth technology the ship has, but I did serve as a Sub Sonar Tech in the U.S. Navy in the early 90's so I can answer the part about what good it might do.

      As you said, subs use almost exclusively sonar to find and track other ships, surface or otherwise. However what they use is passive sonar meaning there are 2 methods for being stealthy.

      1. The best way is not to be heard, usually by being very very quiet, though this is combined with tactical use of so-called 'layers' where there are sharp differences in the speed of sound caused by temperature and pressure differences. This will refract (bend) the sound waves and if the difference is extreme enough it will even reflect them (this is similar to the effect that causes a windows to reflect some of the light). That's what subs attempt to do, and it's not really an option for surface ships since the aforementioned layers tend to bend sound downwards such that it favors the subs:

      Your typical graph of speed of sound (SoS) vs. depth looks something like this:

      /
      /
      /
      /
      /
      \
      \

      Sound (or any wave for that matter) will bend 'towards' the slower speed (Sonar Techs say 'sound is lazy'). Initially the temperature gradient causes the SoS to follow a corresponding gradient (colder is slower, IIRC 1.8 feet/sec. per 1 degree F difference), and at some point (depending on the temperature conditions) the temperature gradient levels off and pressure becomes the deciding factor (higher pressure is faster). This can even cause the sound to be 'funneled' over great distances as if it were in a tube.
      The other factor favoring subs here is that propeller noise (through cavitation) is much easier to prevent in higher pressure water, i.e. deep water.

      2. The second method is to disguise your sound, for example by making the sound coming from the ship sound more like a rain squall. There are many many sounds in the ocean, and rain is a pretty easy sound to emulate. We once almost got run over by a friendly ship because of this. They couldn't hear us and and we thought it was rain!!

      Hmmm.... I spent a bit too long on this post, gotta get back to work :-( Hope it helped.

      -chris

      --
      San Francisco values: compassion, tolerance, respect, intelligence
    15. Re:Corvette by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good thing you got modded funny than informative. None of GM's passenger car's are gas guzzler's. That includes the corvette. The C5 corvette is rated 30 MPG on highway. That of course is with standard driving conditions.

    16. Re:Corvette by cfuse · · Score: 1

      Is it just me, or has Admiral Janeway come back from the future to outfit the boat with ablative hull armour?

    17. Re:Corvette by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

      But are they still basing their mileage numbers on skipping a gear? I recall back in the 80s (granted, not a proud decade for the Vette, can you say Throttle Body Injection?) you were officially supposed to skip either second or third gear, don't recall which. That was the only way they could get their advertised mileage.

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    18. Re:Corvette by Balp · · Score: 1

      Stealth isvery good ob mine layers. Doing your mission with out the enemy knowing where you are is essentional to the mine warfair idea. It the enemy knows where you have been they can know where you have layed your mines and acn quickly avoid that area.

      You have to tell in what area you have put mines so that civilian crafts can navigaresafe but the area you gives out is usally a loot bigger that the actuall area that you have been possible to put mines in.

      / Anders, former conscript in the Swedish Navy, as minelayer.

  16. BSOD by PhuckH34D · · Score: 5, Funny
    well... blue is an excellent camouflage color on the water...

    --
    You're old school? I beta tested the motherf***ing abacus!
  17. Support ? by Alcoyotl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    IIRC, Microsoft was bound to stop support on windows NT 4. Are there any kind of provisions for systems such as this, which is going to be in service for quite some time? Or will the Swedish Navy be on its own if some glitch appears ?
    I know that using an old an proven operation system is better because all major bugs have been either wiped out or referenced, still I'm not sure that using a closed source unsupported OS is the smartest way. But maybe they know better ?

    1. Re:Support ? by lseltzer · · Score: 4, Informative
      See Retiring Windows NT Server 4.0: Changes in Product Availability and Support:
      • January 1, 2004 - Beginning on this date, non-security hotfixes are no longer available.


      • January 1, 2005 - Beginning on this date, Pay-per-incident and Premier support will no longer be available. This includes security hotfixes.

        January 1, 2005
        (or later) - Online support will no longer be available
    2. Re:Support ? by Tim+C · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd imagine that if yo wave enough money at the right person at Microsoft, you'd buy yourself as much support for whatever product of theirs as you liked.

      I can't think of a single company that wouldn't keep a dedicated team employed if paid to do so. All you have to do is cover the costs plus some profit - I can't think of a reason not to.

    3. Re:Support ? by lseltzer · · Score: 1

      Because it's important to them to get customers moved off of old generations and on to new ones.

    4. Re:Support ? by ozbird · · Score: 1

      Now you know why some computers are referred to as "boat anchors".

    5. Re:Support ? by GMC-jimmy · · Score: 1
      Or will the Swedish Navy be on its own if some glitch appears ?

      You say that as if it's possible that a glitch won't happen. You were refering to Windows NT, right ?
      --
      __________________________________
      Free your mind - Flush your toilet
    6. Re:Support ? by Ytsejam-03 · · Score: 1
      IIRC, Microsoft was bound to stop support on windows NT 4. Are there any kind of provisions for systems such as this, which is going to be in service for quite some time? Or will the Swedish Navy be on its own if some glitch appears ?
      Microsoft seems to at least be continuing to issue security patches for NT4. The Swedish Navy had better have a support contract with Microsoft that guarantees that they will at least be supported while this ship is in service.

      IIRC, NT4 was released around 1996 or so. It was vulnerable to both blaster and sasser, both of which exploited remote root vulnerabilities. Makes one wonder how many other unpublished vulnerabilies of this nature the black hats out there already know about.

      If I was the going to be serving on this ship, this would make me very nervous.
    7. Re:Support ? by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      There are two reasons for that:

      1) so they can sell new versions
      2) so they can stop supporting old ones

      The more products you have to support, the more support staff you have to pay. If you're not charging for that support (and patches, updates, etc are free and included in this definition of support) then as your support team grows, so do your costs, with no (direct) increase in revenue to fund them.

      The difference here is if I contact MS and offer them, say $10m/year to provide on-demand support for me for my machines running NT4, then

      1) that more than pays for a dedicated team
      2) the price I'm paying far more than offsets my not purchasing a newer version of Windows

      In general yes, of course MS want people to upgrade. But for specific, exceptional cases, it may well be in their interests to come to an arrangement of some kind. It just depends on the money.

    8. Re:Support ? by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Government contracts get special versions of windows, portions of code, etc. Noone says this is "NT 4" and even if it's based on NT4, it's not the NT4 that comes in a retail box.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    9. Re:Support ? by TechniMyoko · · Score: 2, Insightful

      why would an NT box that doesn't have an internet connection require security patches? a computer not connected to the internet is infinitly safer than any PC that is (including linux)

    10. Re:Support ? by jafac · · Score: 1

      . . . and SWEDISH government contracts get an even more special version of windows, complete with the NSAKey library. . .

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    11. Re:Support ? by Ytsejam-03 · · Score: 1
      why would an NT box that doesn't have an internet connection require security patches?
      What about internal threats? Sure, in a perfect world you could trust the entire crew, but that seems like a naive assmption.

      Perhaps this thing won't be connected to the internet, but it seems likely to me that they would be connected to some sort of military network. What happens when that network gets infected with virus or worm?
    12. Re:Support ? by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      "Hello Microsoft Technical support how can we help you?"
      "We are in the middle of a battle and our heavy guns software won't let us fire."
      "OH my! We will help you right away, what operating system are you using?"
      "Windows NT 4.0"
      ...click...... "Hello? Anyone there?"

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    13. Re:Support ? by Aczlan · · Score: 1

      FYI: Windows 2000 is NT 5.0 XP is NT 5.1 and 2003 Server is NT 5.2 so it is possible to be running "Windows NT" and still be under support Aaron Z

      --
      "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote
    14. Re:Support ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Microsoft has released a security update for Windows NT. The patch addresses the vulnerability in the fiberglass shield that can be used by an attacker to gain control of the user's battleship.
      The patch also addresses the problem of the steering wheel stop responding when you plug a USB missile launcher.

      To install the patch dock your battleship and uninstall all third party weapons system not digitally signed by Microsoft. It is also recommended to unload all ammo and switch to a nuclear power supply if you are running on batteries."

    15. Re:Support ? by cavebear42 · · Score: 1

      The article didn't say it was NT 4. IT could be W2k (NT 5) or even XP. Also, due to bad press thx to worms at end of 2003, the retirement date of NT 4 has been moved to the end of next month. (shown by hot fixes for last week are offered for NT 4)

    16. Re:Support ? by Ultra+Magnus · · Score: 1

      Don't you remember the last Sasser worm? Virus writers have also stopped supporting NT

    17. Re:Support ? by lalleglad · · Score: 1

      Well, the Swedish Navy isn't one of the coolest organisations in Sweden (well, anywhere), eg. you could ask them how they feel about Russian submarines around the Swedish coast or if they prefer Scottish Whisky? ;-)

      They do, however, have an awesome Air Force with airplanes the US of A can only dream of! USA could of course buy them, but national pride probably prohibits that.

    18. Re:Support ? by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      what about the shared source license?

  18. Dell Has a USB driver for NT by MrRuslan · · Score: 1

    altogh it is half baked it works..kinda...and second of all a new warship running on windows gives a new meaning to crash and burn...perhaps they should name it The NTanic

  19. Forget a USB-powered Steering Wheel... by Tuxedo+Jack · · Score: 2, Funny

    How about USB-controlled torpedo/missile tubes?

    That'll _really_ make a WinNuke.

    --

    Striking fear in the authors of godawful fanfiction, I am here, appearing in darkness, Tuxedo Jack!
    1. Re:Forget a USB-powered Steering Wheel... by MrRuslan · · Score: 1

      I think WUSB torpedos are more practical...the only problem is the range.

    2. Re:Forget a USB-powered Steering Wheel... by magefile · · Score: 1

      He said torpedo tubes.

    3. Re:Forget a USB-powered Steering Wheel... by janbjurstrom · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I know it's a joke, so yes, except Sweden doesn't have "nukes".

      Actually (I'm Swedish) we don't have much of an army, airforce, or navy, at all anymore..

      Not that I personally agree to spending the kind of money you do in the US, but the military situation is pretty pathetic in Sweden (although it's been a few hundred years since we were a military power by any standard).

      We can't defend our borders at all, and we probably can't wage an effective (defensive/guerilla) war on Swedish soil either (no militia to speak of, laws against owning weapons other than for hunting, etc.).

      The cuts in the military budget has been brutal, to the point I was kind of amazed that they've been able to develop this stealth vessel at all (with what money - the entire navy budget?!?).

      Without much debate, politicians have been working overtime to convert (reduce) our own military to a few special units (like this stealth corvette thing) - perhaps to be used in some large EU military force.. (Not that I know enough about it to say whether 'tis a 'Good Thing', but I've always considered self-reliance to be important, so.. I guess I think it sucks bigtime.)

      --
      668.5
    4. Re:Forget a USB-powered Steering Wheel... by Martin+Blank · · Score: 3, Informative

      Part of it is the relative quiet in that part of the world. It's one of the reasons that, since 1991, there has been political pressure in the US to move forces from Germany to somewhere else where they'd be more useful. Any power there willing to try to build up forces for offensive operations would likely be unable to hide significant portions of it, and would thus provide time and reason for surrounding nations to match a buildup. Everyone knows it, and Europe is mostly united in its desire to aquire more money instead of more bullets, so there's little reason for anyone to go on the offensive.

      Barring a revival of the Russian bear, there's really not a lot to worry about, and besides, you've got the Finns there to sacrifice themselves for your safety (as has happened on several occasions in the past, IIRC). :)

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    5. Re:Forget a USB-powered Steering Wheel... by Larsing · · Score: 1

      The reason we have six stealth corvettes and 200 fourth generation fighter/bomber/recon aircraft (the Air Force now estimates it needs/can afford around 60) is that these and all similar projects (like the RBS15 and RBS23 missile systems fittend on the ship) were commisioned before the end of the cold war.
      And also, terminating the projects would make a hell of a lot of people unemployed...

      --
      Ethics is what you say you do. Morals is what you actually do.
    6. Re:Forget a USB-powered Steering Wheel... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Really. I did not know the Swedish millitary was in the dumps. The air force had some really inovative Aircraft like the Draken ,Viggin, and the Greif? Or what ever the new one is called. Really very impressive that the stayed in the fighter business at all. Many small countries could not or would not make the investment.
      The navy also did some impresive work with Air Independant Propulsion systems on subs.

      Self-reliamce is important up to a point. Sweden has only x amount of money and a ton of social programs. I guess something had to give they decided to reduce the military. In Sweden's positon it may very well be a good choice. They really have no threats currently. Russia for now is not a "bad" guy. And the EU is not looking for a fight with sweden well at least not a military fight.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    7. Re:Forget a USB-powered Steering Wheel... by Peden · · Score: 1

      All that might be so, but you have one hell of a cool tank in that CV90: http://members.surfeu.fi/stefan.allen/cv90120.html

    8. Re:Forget a USB-powered Steering Wheel... by nxcho · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, sweden hasnät had any wars 1814. And currently there is no big threat against Sweden (no Ivan lurking in the waters).

      I think that warefare is defenently going to change. There isn't enough money or stupidity to start a full scale war these days. As we have seen on the news the only conflics around are either etnical conflicts (nigeria etc.) with lots of civillian casualties or big bulky old time armies trying to hunt down terrorist with the same means intended to use att full scale war agains russia, (iraq, israel/palestine).

      The swedish defences goal is to hold sweden in seven days and bring so much damage to an invading force that that their costs would be so high that they would rather not attack. But as the i there are no huge army standing att the border. There is no need for a big armed force of sweden.

      But the question still remains, what will the sweedish royal navy do with a stealth ship?

      Gå och lägg dig. (Swedish for Bork! Bork! bork!)

      --
      When asked why, the answer is almost always: "It's 2014".
    9. Re:Forget a USB-powered Steering Wheel... by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

      With the prices in Sweden, no one could afford to invade. They probably need a stealth ship to avoid the taxes.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    10. Re:Forget a USB-powered Steering Wheel... by Alexei · · Score: 1

      One would hope not, seeing as how Sweden's -in- the EU.

    11. Re:Forget a USB-powered Steering Wheel... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Well that was I thought a givin. However many people in EU countries do not feel that the EU is looking out for there best interest. I do not really have an opinon on it just giving voice to the many people that I have heard say that they feel that those countires on the "fring" of the EU Like Sweden, the UK, and Spain are not as in the EU as say France and Germany. Even in the EU for better or worse there are some that feel that they are giving away too much of their right to self determination. The trick is to know how many really feel that way. Like most places the extremes tend to get all the coverage.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    12. Re:Forget a USB-powered Steering Wheel... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And rightfully so!

      After all, who needs to think about war when you got the Sweedish Bakini Team?!?!

      Boobs over bombs anyday... :P

    13. Re:Forget a USB-powered Steering Wheel... by lalleglad · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I've always considered self-reliance to be important"

      So you think still staying out of NATO is good, too? Joining the group, kicking and screaming?

      The concept of a country is >100years too old and self reliance is a myth, ask the finns when fighting the russians (my grandfather took part there and frooze his butt off, but anyway thanks for trying), the Danish Jews when escaping the nazis and the Norwegians when receving the same guys going through Sweden from Denmark. So it isn't so simple.

      Actually, Swedish military hasn't been worth just about anything since Wasa sank.

      There is no such thing as selv reliance, and you are probably right that Sweden wouldn't be able to defend yourselves even on your own soil, but then who would want to try? Between Stockholm and Kiruna there isn't much but agriculture and some fishing, except perhaps for a good hockey team in Oernskjoeldsvik/Husum that also has a lot of forrestation (now owned by some Finns ;-)

    14. Re:Forget a USB-powered Steering Wheel... by janbjurstrom · · Score: 1

      [sorry for the late post, been ironing shirts for friggin hours :/]

      Agreed, my country's pretty miniscule and self-reliance (in terms of military force) isn't feasible, i.e. if the s*** hits the fan we could never handle it alone.

      And with ever-shrinking resources for the school system, public healthcare, &c., there are more pressing needs for the people. The military though ...tough call.. when there're no threat one might not see any need for it whatsoever, but in these turbulent times...

      I am actually more-or-less a 'pacifist'. But a 'pacifist' that has, especially during the last decade with all that's happened globally, and possibly with age (turned 30 this year) become less against ..might call it "readiness for whatever." There are really no guarantees for anything are there(?) "Better safe than sorry," and similar clichées have started to sound more and more ..realistic.

      But like you say, Russia's nolonger a threat (although that might change). And being part of an "EU army" might not be so bad either - at least we (probably) won't start any new major wars here in Europe. But if the big nations in the EU decide on some course of action that we as a small, fringe member don't agree on ...well, there might be huge problems.

      [The aircrafts were/are "Draken" (The Dragon), "Viggen" ('aring'skvigg = thunderbolt so The Thunderbolt), and "Gripen" (The Griffin). And yea, for such a small country, those are pretty cool (if somewhat in the 'delusions of grandeur' zone) machines/systems/accomplishments. We also had the jetcraft "Lansen" (The Lance) and "Tunnan" (The Barrel - my absolute favorite, a butt-ugly small 'hunter' jet - just look at that craft! :) )]

      --
      668.5
    15. Re:Forget a USB-powered Steering Wheel... by lalleglad · · Score: 1

      I forgot:

      Sono sig wa warukunain janai? (^_^)/

      ---
      Kyou wa haretara sampo ni ikimashou.

    16. Re:Forget a USB-powered Steering Wheel... by Hyler · · Score: 1
      I was kind of amazed that they've been able to develop this stealth vessel at all
      "They" being...?

      It's not the navy that has developed this, it's Kockums. They're also trying to sell this class of ship elsewhere (U.S. Coast Guard considered it) and they're also gaining R&D and selling the composite material technology. It's not just welding and gluing the pieces together.

      --
      It's its. They're their, there. You're your. Who's whose? A looser loser, though those two too threw through the trough.
    17. Re:Forget a USB-powered Steering Wheel... by GoCal92 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Wasn't it Eisenhower who said we really only needed one American soldier in Germany? The only real purpose of the forces in Germany was to die in the initial assault from the Soviets. They might be able to slow them down a bit, but those forces only really existed as a "trip wire" to bring the U.S. into the conflict.

      The same is true of the American forces in South Korea. There isn't nearly enough to stop the million plus army of North Korea - really, they're there to slow down the assault and die. Their deaths would require the U.S. to enter the conflict.

      If Europe is serious about maintaining a force that can ensure the sovereignty of EU nations, what they really need is heavy lift capability. Being able to get the constituent forces large enough to repel an invasion to the battlefield requires them to have an infrastructure and vehicles to move massive amounts of soldiers and equipment. He who gets there first with the most usually wins.

      NATO understands this. The major contribution from the U.S. will be heavy lift capability. I remember reading a story of how the allied commanders met with the German commanders after WWII to discuss the various battles and campaigns they were involved with. The Americans looked at the battle plan for Barbarossa, and their first question was, "Where are the trucks?" The American commanders were amazed that the Germans would plan such an attack using horse-drawn carts as a means of moving men and material.

      As it is, Europe depends mainly on the U.S. as a guarantor of their sovereignty. (I don't think the Poles will depend on the French as guarantors of their sovereignty ever again!) Aside from the use of nuclear weapons, I don't think any EU nation aside from Great Britain has sufficient armed forces on its own to ensure their own sovereignty. As has been mentioned, the need for this "guarantee" is considerably less nowadays with the dismantling of the Soviet threat.

    18. Re:Forget a USB-powered Steering Wheel... by janbjurstrom · · Score: 1

      [sorry for the late post, been offline]

      NATO? The obsolete cold-war relic NATO? Heck yea ;). Actually I don't feel I know enough about the issue/NATO (wasn't it originally a united front against the Soviet Union and, as such, is now a solution looking for a problem?). Wouldn't developments toward a military alliance within the EU framework sort of make NATO obsolete for EU countries? That said, NATO exists and seems to be functioning, and I don't know enough about the issue to have an informed opinion (obviously doesn't stop me from ranting about it ;) ).

      What I do know, is that big power structures and enormous governing frameworks equals gargantuan bureaucracies (i.e. less democracy, accountability, &c.). And as such, I'm not too keen on neither NATO nor EU..

      Yes, I understand that the "nation state" is a manufactured idea (good job dissing Sweden btw, couldn't've done it better myself - I agree that Sweden has historically behaved dishonorably, and WWII is a very disheartening chapter in Sweden's book). I'm certainly not a flag-waving "loving-my-country-come-hell-or-high-water" lunatic.

      But, countries exist (as do e.g. NATO). Some - like me - even think they work ok enough (given the alternatives). Being small/agile enough frameworks (at least in the Scandinavian cases) to have mostly working accountability and a somewhat engaged democratic process, but large enough to be able (well, should be) to handle healthcare, education, and, to become slightly on-topic, defense.

      With global/trans-national problems, the nation state framework won't cut it. But those are rare exeptions. Most things - I think - can be better handled on the micro-level (i.e. the scale of individual, group, family, neighborhood, and so forth) and the most resources should be put there.

      I might've come across that all this was "simple", I didn't intend to. If it was simple, well, there wouldn't be a problem in the first place.

      I agree in principle that (absolute) self-reliance is probably impossible. To me, self-reliance is an attitude. E.g. I don't agree with just stopping to do something and expect someone else to handle it for me (and I feel the same way on a national scale).

      Giving up and handing over chunks of autonomy to a larger framework, I believe, should only be done with utmost scrutiny. It can swiftly lead to servitude, I don't want to be a servant. (Please note, I'm not saying that the opposite is your opinion, I'm just trying to expand on my simplified argument in my earlier post.)

      Cheers,
      JB

      --
      668.5
    19. Re:Forget a USB-powered Steering Wheel... by janbjurstrom · · Score: 1

      Good points, thanks. (I don't expect an invasion any time soon either, but the thought of fully depending on someone else is really disagreable to me.)

      And yes, I agree to having the Finns as cannon fodd... No but seriously, as I was replying in another post in this thread, our conduct in some real black&white situations - especially during WWII - has been shameful... I vividly recall becoming extremely embarrased (and enraged) in highschool, when learning about our servile attitude towards the Nazis.

      We really played the "Neutral nation over here, no shooting please!" card to stay out of the conflict - and in the aftermath, with fully functioning industries etc., Sweden could capitalize and thrive to 'help' rebuild Europe. Same factories we - for a period - used to produce shells for Nazi weapons..

      --
      668.5
    20. Re:Forget a USB-powered Steering Wheel... by BerntB · · Score: 1
      Barring a revival of the Russian bear, there's really not a lot to worry about
      Think back the last hundred years.

      14, 33, 39, 52, 63, 68, 89. (And probably more that I've forgotten.)

      Unexpected large changes of the European political/military safety environment has been common! I can't see a reason to assume that it has stopped.

      We in Sweden have stopped paying for our fire insurance...

      --
      Karma: Excellent (My Karma? I wish...:-( )
    21. Re:Forget a USB-powered Steering Wheel... by janbjurstrom · · Score: 1

      Hehe, sorry - yea, that was unclearly stated (not that I even checked which company developed this plastic boat ;) ).

      Never wrote so, but just assumed it was done similarly to SAAB developing fighter jet tech for the airforce. I was under the impression that most - all? - Swedish weapon systems of this magnitude were developed by companies on military contracts, i.e. financed with the defense budget. But perhaps FOA &c. undertake huge projects like this too(?)

      Pardon for any errors/misconceptions. I should've explained straight away that I don't work (or have expertise) in the military tech sector, and that my post was "opinion and guesswork on account of being Swedish, and interested in technology" :)

      --
      668.5
    22. Re:Forget a USB-powered Steering Wheel... by janbjurstrom · · Score: 1

      Oh, damn. I have to admit that I've just started studying Japanese (why the "I like ham"-esque sig attempt :) ) - still struggling with kana and rudimentary kanji, and with the most basic grammar and vocabulary... Beautiful language though.

      Sorry to say I have no idea what you asked me.. (something like "That's not a very good/intelligible sig, is it? :)"? - well, truthfully that's just trying to piece together what altavista returned, so it's probably something completely different..)

      What your current sig means, I'm at a complete loss. Sounds good though, even with my abysmal pronounciation :)

      Cheers,
      JB

      --
      668.5
    23. Re:Forget a USB-powered Steering Wheel... by lalleglad · · Score: 1

      Your sig says: This is not a sig

      My body says: That's not such a bad sig.
      With a Japanese smiley waving its hand.

      My sig then says: If it's gonna be sunshine today let's go for a stroll.

      This sentence comes from the cassette tape played repeatedly at the Nihongo Nouryoku Shiken (Japanese Proficiency Test for foreigners) in Japan before the test starts. At least it did when I took both 3. and 2. Kyu in early 90'ies in Shibyua and Shinjuku :-)

    24. Re:Forget a USB-powered Steering Wheel... by janbjurstrom · · Score: 1

      Ah, +1 informative, thanks :) And cool, interesting reference in your current sig, certainly more coherent than my lame Magritte nod (the french equivalent was taken - obviously, and I was learning about 'being'/'not being' in Japanese at the time so..).

      Without reading very much into it, I like the /.er's sig which was something like "Slashdot sigs, online Rorschach tests since 1997."

      --
      668.5
  20. Steering by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Was probably to be done by a wheel anyway. That it's made out of wood at the request of the officers is probably a nod to tradition.

  21. Pictures? by m1chael · · Score: 0

    Are there any pictures are is this submarine really good?

    --
    I know you are psychotic, but please make an effort.
  22. Titanic ... by arhar · · Score: 0, Troll

    .. probably ran on Windows NT, too.

    1. Re:Titanic ... by TechniMyoko · · Score: 1

      maybe, human error and bad construction caused it to crash though, so if it did run NT you couldn't blame NT

  23. Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by s20451 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm not a materials scientist, but I would imagine that carbon fibre can burn. A huge advantage of steel is that it may weaken under heat stress, but it will never contribute to a fire, which is one of the gravest threats to a warship in combat.

    The British learned this lesson the hard way in the Falklands. In that case the new building material was aluminum, which can actually burn when it gets hot enough. This contributed to the loss of several ships which suffered massive fires after being hit by Argentinian aircraft. As a result, not only in the UK but in navies around the world, new naval ships are built entirely out of steel.

    --
    Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    1. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by The_Mr_Flibble · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's not actually the carbon fibres that burn it's usually the stuff that holds it together. Have if you aply enough current to a piece of carbon you can make a cool ark.

    2. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it doesn't matter....

      these fast strike ships are fine, but in a real battle a behomoth made in 1920's like the old IOWA class battleship with foot thick steel belts for armor that make things like the exocet anti ship missle 100% ineffective are the only solution.

      plus there is nothing like firing projectiles the size of Volkswagon Bettles to scare your opponent.

      the HMS bork bork bork is a joke... actually all naval vessles made in the last 60 years are a joke compared to the real battleships of WW-II.

    3. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by madpoet_one · · Score: 5, Informative

      As someone who worked in a carbon fiber development lab in the eighties, I will agree that carbon fiber can burn.

      But as the MSDS for carbon fiber points out:

      Flammability classification: Not classified.
      Flash Point/Method: Not known, but very high!
      Auto-Ignition Temperature: Not determined
      Flammable Limits: Lower: Not applicable
      Upper: Not applicable

      Carbon Fiber MSDS link

      --
      Remain lost in hidden worlds where I reign. Head engine and caboose in my toy train...
    4. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno if carbon fiber burns, but the epoxy probably does if it's like fiberglass.

    5. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by meringuoid · · Score: 4, Insightful
      the HMS bork bork bork is a joke... actually all naval vessles made in the last 60 years are a joke compared to the real battleships of WW-II.

      WWII demonstrated the obsolescence of your old behemoths. Take the British and German fleets from the battle of Jutland: classic dreadnoughts, immense steel battleships with incredible armour and gigantic guns. Put them on one side. Take the HMS Ark Royal, a small aircraft carrier from the modern Royal Navy. Put that on the other side. Which side wins?

      If you said anything other than Ark Royal you lose. Our good friends the Japanese demonstrated in 1941 what happens to traditional battleships when someone in an aeroplane has a go at them.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    6. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      the HMS bork bork bork is a joke... actually all naval vessles made in the last 60 years are a joke compared to the real battleships of WW-II.

      That's because they don't need to go in for close combat. Firing massive shells is a relic of the days when naval wars were fought with cannons. These days a carrier would strike your battleship from over 100 miles out and sink her without a single useful shot fired by the battleship. Not to mention that armor is relatively ineffective against many modern weapons that are designed to pierce armor. Thus naval warfare focuses on a different set of abilities:

      1. Ability to launch a strike from great distances.
      2. Speed to quickly enter and exit a theater of operations (U.S.S Enterprise [CVN-65] did 32 knots, non-stop, around the world!)
      3. Stealth to sneak up on a ship without getting blasted from a hundred miles away. (Subs still rule this area.)
      4. Screening ships and weapons to shoot down incoming planes.
      5. Survivability via ability to float despite massive internal damage.
      6. G.I. proofing so that no one accidentally blows up the ship from the inside. (Don't laugh, this happened several times in WWII.)

      The truth however, is that any major conflict would probably see a total loss of all seagoing vessels. They'd simply start lobbing nukes at one another until they are all destroyed or capsized.

    7. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      Wrong example. The Japanese torpedoed the battleships while they were tied up in port. A better example is what we did to the Yamato a couple of years later.

    8. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it doesn't. You can put fire extinguishers in the matrix of the composite, although that is not _that_ environment-friendly. Moreover, imho, it is more important not to get detected by radar, and for the Swedisch almost as important (near the seashore, remember) by magnetic mines.

      The Britisch found that out, true. The exocet that hit hms Sheffield caused only about ten victims (just to indicate the low damage). However, there was no alternative to alu, to avoid making the ship to top-heavy (is that a correct word?). Modern weapon-systems are extremely heavy _and_ must be located quite high above the water line. I remember the mount of a typical gun turret takes twice as much space under deck as above, for instance.

      Of course, one could argue type-42 destroyers/frigates were budget-driven designs. I, for me, think they should never have scrapped type-82 (google for hms Bristol). One of the finest ships ever built.

    9. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A ship is a soft target. Heavy armour will do about as much good as any daily newspaper.

    10. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by larkost · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even better, replace that aircraft carrier with a missile cruiser and some good satellite coverage.

    11. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Bizmark was on its own. Before Clinton mothballed them, our battleships operated within a task force, including much anti-aircraft and anti-missile capability. The thick steel walls were still quite helpful (say, compared to the aluminium of the HMS Antelope and the HMS Sheffield)

      We found the 16 inch guns to be helpful in coastal conflicts, much less expensive than cruise missiles, and more effective. With modern railguns or multi-staged gas guns, and wave-rider intelligent shells, the range could be significantly increased. A battleship like the Iowa could also mount a couple MTHELs to provide protection for the entire task force for anything from an ICBM to an incoming artillery shell.

      There was a proposal to fill the gap in our naval force structure with "arsenal ships" that would hold large numbers of cruise missiles, but they were also made of carbon fiber, and I think the plan hasn't ever taken form.

    12. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by GWTPict · · Score: 0

      Right example if he's referring to HMS Prince of Wales and HMS Repulse, a battleship and a battlecruiser respectively, sunk by Japanese aircraft off Malaya in December 1941.

    13. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by JavaNPerl · · Score: 1
      According to the article apparently they have addressed that issue...
      Moreover, in searching for a radar-resistant material, the Swedes seem to have stumbled across a technology that could offer improved strength and rigidity, lower weight and better shock and flame resistance than steel.

      My concern would be repairing battle damage at sea. How do you patch carbon fiber? Bondo perhaps? I'd be more reassured with a material that I could weld a plate to.

    14. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by wayward_son · · Score: 1

      That's why they don't make battleships anymore.

      The planes on a carrier can spot and sink a battleship long before the battleship gets in range of the carrier.

    15. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may not burn, but steel heats up when it bends. A collision between two wooden ships results in a hole, but a collision between two steel ships can cause massive amounts of heat, contributing to a fire by causing it.

    16. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by HBI · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your theory fails to take into account surface to air missiles.

      I'd like to see your airplanes vs. an AEGIS cruiser.

      (splash)

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    17. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by BigBadBri · · Score: 1
      The carbon fibre itself may not be very flammable, but the epoxy resin used to bond the fibre will burn, though not in the sort of conflagration that caught the Sheffield in the Falklands.

      I'd expect it to char and smoulder, in most cases.

      --
      oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
    18. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or the raid that the Japanese learned from.

      The Japanese military attache in Rome took a long hard looked at what even biplanes could do.

    19. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by shiftless · · Score: 1

      Well I don't know about fire, but what about strength? Carbon fiber is light and strong, but it tends to rip and shatter instead of buckling like steel does. A small collision that would damage a steel ship could tear through the hull and sink a carbon fiber ship.

    20. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by jafac · · Score: 1

      Seems to me a simple wooden Viking Longship would have about the same low-radar visibility. And shallower draft means they can launch attacks up rivers and rocky shores.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    21. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by phayes · · Score: 4, Informative
      Building major combattants out of carbon fiber & epoxy may well expose these ships to fire hasards (however this will be more related to the epoxy that binds the fibers than the carbon fibers themselves. Carbon fibers burn relatively cleanly, epoxies, on the other hand put out fumes that will incapacitate & blind crewmembers that are trying to control the damage). Having carbon structural members burn through & fail is of little import if everyone is already dead due to the smoke.

      Your example of HMS Sheffield is in any case incorrect and is covered in the sci.military.navy FAQ:

      There are many misconceptions and incorrect stories regarding the use of aluminum in warship construction.

      One common story is that HMS Sheffield, a destroyer sunk during the 1982 Falkland War, was lost because her alleged aluminum superstructure made her more vulnerable to damage. This story is completely untrue, because Sheffield's superstructure was not aluminum. Like all ships of her class, her hull and superstructure were entirely steel. Aluminum played no role in her loss.

      Two Royal Navy warships lost during the Falklands War did have aluminum superstructures, and their loss is incorrectly attributed to this feature. Ardent was hit by seven 500- and 1000-pound bombs, plus at least two more bombs which failed to detonate, and sank some six hours after the attack. Any warship of her size, regardless of aluminum or steel construction, would likely be sunk by this many bombs, so aluminum cannot be blamed here. Antelope, another aluminum-superstructure ship, was struck by two bombs, which lodged in the ship but failed to explode. Later, while one of the bombs was being defused, it exploded, blowing a major hole in the hull and starting a large fire. The fire eventually reached the magazines, causing these to explode. Again, an aluminum superstructure appears to have little connection to the ship's loss, which was caused by the explosion of the bomb and the magazines.

      A related story claims the US Navy and Royal Navy abanonded aluminum superstructures, in favor of steel, as a result of the Falklands war. Since aluminum superstructures played little or no role in the Falkands losses, this story is obviously untrue. The Royal Navy's switch to steel appears to be a result of a 1977 fire in the frigate Amazon. In the US Navy, the switch from aluminum to steel superstructures was a result of the 1975 collision between the carrier John F. Kennedy and the cruiser Belknap. The collision caused major fires aboard the cruiser, and her aluminum superstructure essentially melted; she was reduced to a badly burnt hulk. This incident lead to a decision to adopt steel superstructures in the next new warship class, the Arleigh Burke (DDG 51) class destroyers. This decision had been made prior to the Falkands War.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    22. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by Gerb · · Score: 1

      You must be Gareth from The Office.

      Gerb

      --
      There's no place like 127.0.0.1
    23. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by kabocox · · Score: 1

      when someone in an aeroplane has a go at them.

      Hey, those were first generation smart bombs.

    24. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, steel will burn just fine, although you have to get the temperature up pretty high. Rusting is essentially just burning in slow motion; anything that oxidizes naturally will burn exothermically, and thus has the potential of self-sustaining reactions. Iron rusts relatively quickly, and burns more easily than steel. Steel rusts much more slowly, but still rusts. Believe it or not, even stainless steel rusts, although very very slowly, and perhaps in a way that slows further rusting.

      Most modern skyscrapers are extensively fireproofed to prevent the whole things from collapsing in the event of a fire. While this is mainly due to the heat softening the steel to the point that structural integrity is lost, in the worst fires the steel itself will start to burn.

      As a sidenote, this didn't happen in the case of the WTCs, believe it or not, because jet fuel burns rapidly, causing relatively little heating. It makes big pretty explosions, but not very effective ones. The towers probably fell because other materials, such as furniture, etc. kept burning afterwards, weakening the structure until the floors collapsed.

    25. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Take the British and German fleets from the battle of Jutland... Put them on one side. Take the HMS Ark Royal... Put that on the other side. Which side wins?

      They both lose, as they take on massive amounts of water from being on their sides.

    26. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by elBart0 · · Score: 1

      >There was a proposal to fill the gap in our naval force structure with "arsenal ships" that would hold large numbers of cruise missiles, but they were also made of carbon fiber, and I think the plan hasn't ever taken form.

      Actually, it has, but rather than ships, it's submarines.
      info
      more info
      The Ohio, Michigan, Florida, and Georgia are all being converted to SSGN from SSBN, and will carry about 150 tomahawks each.

      Talk about projection of power ashore...

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    27. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by flippet · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see your airplanes vs. an AEGIS cruiser.

      Erm. Planes launch missiles outside the range of the cruiser; planes go home; cruiser is left to take down every single incoming. Aegis is good, but it's not invincible, and the planes can always come back tomorrow.

      --
      "Cattle Prods solve most of life's little problems."
    28. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by Tiro · · Score: 1
      Your post raises a tangential point about the uselessness of navies in today's combat.

      They are sitting ducks for air forces, and even aircraft carriers can't do much that long range bombers or portable cruise missile launchers can do.

      While they have some advantage of being mobile in international waters, that probably doesn't justify their enormous costs. Yet the U.S. keeps building them because its Congressional pork barrel politics--they manage to get portions of the industry located in just about every state.

    29. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by weiyuent · · Score: 1

      Your theory fails to take into account surface to air missiles. I'd like to see your airplanes vs. an AEGIS cruiser.

      One word: Exocet.

      AEGIS or no AEGIS, defence against over-the-horizon anti-ship-missile attacks is nearly impossible. And the next generation of missiles is even deadlier.

    30. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Take the British and German fleets from the battle of Jutland... Take the HMS Ark Royal... Which side wins?... If you said anything other than Ark Royal you lose.


      Lets change that a bit to be one of the modernized Iowa class battleships vs Ark Royal. I wouldn't put my money on Ark Royal.

      Military technology has cycles just like computer technology does. We are reusing some techniques from the '60s and '70s in computers today. Advances in military technology have perversely made battleships viable again for many tasks.

      Take your Pearl Harbor example. Naval weapons today tend to be much less dangerous to a battleship then weapons from the 1940s. Few modern navies stock the types of aerial weapons needed to kill a battleship anymore since there are practically no targets with that type of armor any more. Even fewer navies train to use them. Missile technology has tended to mean smaller warheads which are less capable than ever of posing a serious threat to a battleship. It is unlikely that today's common antiship missiles, like the harpoon or exocet, would be able to cause meaningful damage to a battleship.

      A modern battleship has some pretty sharp claws of its own. A modernized Iowa class battleship has a mix of missiles and guns which gives it a potent long range punch. These include:
      8 quad Tomahawk missile launchers
      4 quad Harpoon launchers
      3 triple 16"/50 gun turrets
      6 dual 5"/38 gun turrets
      4 Phalanx CIWS turrets


      The Iowa class can also launch drones or helicopters for either recon or attack missions.

      Then, of course, there is nothing like a battleship to provide fire support. The US Marines love battleships:
      Public Law 104-106 requires the Navy to maintain the battleships Iowa and Wisconsin as reserve mobilization assets with the necessary logistics for both in active service, providing fire support for the Marine Corps. As the Marine Corps told Congress in 2000 and 2001, "Battleships can provide a significant fire support capability and maintaining them on the Naval Vessel Register ensures they are available in case of conflict."


      Battleships are not quite gone, and definitely not forgotten.

    31. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by hirebrand · · Score: 1
      The truth however, is that any major conflict would probably see a total loss of all seagoing vessels. They'd simply start lobbing nukes at one another until they are all destroyed or capsized.

      Nuclear weapons are actually less effective against ships than one would expect and, of course, fairly useless against submarines. Simply spreading the ships out over a large area of ocean forces the enemy to use a single bomb per vessel -- an expensive proposition. Might as well just use conventional cruise missiles or aircraft bombs.

      "http://nuclearhistory.tripod.com/testing.html#c ross"

      "Damage to the superstructures of the centrally located target ships was considerable, however, there was negligible damage to the hulls of the ships even those closest to ground zero. There were about 20 ships within half a mile, all of which were badly damaged, many being put out of action and five sunk. It required up to 12 days to repair all of those ships left afloat sufficiently so that they could have steamed under their own power to a major base for repair."

      "vessels within a mile of an atomic bomb air burst would eventually become inoperative due to crew casualties"

    32. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by HBI · · Score: 1

      Umm, this assumes you are talking about huge standoff missiles, the kind the old Backfire and Badger bombers carried for the Soviet Naval Aviation.

      Otherwise, if you are within 50nm of the cruiser you are easily within it's envelope.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    33. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by HBI · · Score: 1

      One word: SM-2 MR.

      Your OTH launch platform was just shot down by a Block III SM-2 MR, since it needed to get within 65 km - meanwhile the SM-2 MR shot it down while it was still 100km out.

      Start talking about AS-6 and you might be closer to the mark, though the SM-2 MR will shoot down that missile as easily as it toasted your launch platform just now.

      You need to conduct a massive attack on an AEGIS platform if you expect to take it out.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    34. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by starrsoft · · Score: 1

      RTFA!!
      "Moreover, in searching for a radar-resistant material, the Swedes seem to have stumbled across a technology that could offer improved strength and rigidity, lower weight and better shock and flame resistance than steel."
      --
      Read my blog: HansMast.com
    35. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by radja · · Score: 1

      but at a (confirmed) speed of 11 knots when the wind is good, it's a bit slow. also, the sideshields do little to protect the soldiers inside, who will not be covered anyway against enemy fire or natural rain.

      --

      No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
      --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
    36. Re:Doesn't carbon fibre burn? by rastos1 · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of a quote from a firefighter in some book: "With *suffuciently* high temperatures *everything* burns."

  24. Seafoam blue by SilverGiant · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Captain, everything is in order; the heads-up display shows nothing but blue seas ahead."

  25. New Technology indeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Clippy: It looks like you're trying to kill someone. Are you aware of the Geneva convention? Capt'n: Duh! Bork Bork !@#! Bork Americans !?

  26. -If- Windows goes down...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmm, try when it goes down...

    Captain: Hoist the mainsail and hard ta starboard, ye scurvy dogs! Arrrgh!
    Crew: Cap'n, we cannot! We've run aground on that accursed Blue Screen of Death again!

  27. BSD by QEDog · · Score: 2, Funny
    There is something very appropiate about a Blue Screen of Death as the possible cause of the death of sailors.

    --
    "There is no teacher but the enemy."-Mazer Rackham
    1. Re:BSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean BSOD you dumbass.

  28. Oh great... by blueZ3 · · Score: 1

    CREWMAN: "Captain, the reactor is beginning to overheat, but we can't fix it yet. It may go critical before we regain control." CAPTAIN: "What?" CREWMAN: "Well, sir, every system on the ship just BSOD'd and we're waiting for the reactor control computers to reboot." CAPTAIN: "Abandon Ship!" At least this is the Swedish Navy, so we can assume non-nuclear power.

    --
    Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
  29. Cockpits stand back...... by MrIrwin · · Score: 2, Funny
    I have seen home made racing car cockpits used with racing games, and home made airplane cockpits with flight simulators.

    Next up, homemade bridge for seafaring game, complete with a computer controlled salt water sprayer. I can't wait.......

    --

    And if you thought that was boring you obviously havn't read my Journal ;-)

    1. Re:Cockpits stand back...... by AceCaseOR · · Score: 1

      Well, when was the last warship/submarine sim. Besides, the bridges on most warships nowadays are enclosed anyway. And, if the Swedish navy is using the general ship shape we've seen before for stealth ships, then it'll look something like this

      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
    2. Re:Cockpits stand back...... by dastrike · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      while true; do eject; eject -t; done
    3. Re:Cockpits stand back...... by C_nemo · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The Sea Shaddow design is not the most used stealth ship hull design. The Sea Shaddow is a ship designed for stealth in every way, not only radar as the Visby class. The design of the Sea Shaddow aims to lower its signature for both radar, wake and heat.

      Norway has also designed a stealth missile torpedo boat Skjold

      This is a surface effect ship, and you will have no problems spotting it on IR or seeing its wake. But you will have a *very* hard time seeing it on radar at all.

      As for submarine sims, Silent hunter II aws released 2-3 years ago. You can play it in multiplayer with Destroyer Command. Play the hunter or the hunted.

    4. Re:Cockpits stand back...... by Jott42 · · Score: 1

      The Visby ship has tried to minimize its thermal signature, cf. the exhaust is piped into the sea below the surface.

  30. from the ctrl-alt-del-to-log-in dept.? by warpSpeed · · Score: 1
    from the ctrl-alt-del-to-log-in dept.

    Wouldn't that be: "from the ctrl-alt-del-to-rudder-amid-ship-dept."

  31. It could be worse... by tcopeland · · Score: 1

    ...when I was in the Coast Guard in the middle '90s the computers onboard my ship ran CTOS - Convergent Technology Operating System. On 286s and (if you were lucky) 386s. Very slow, very crashy.

  32. stealth on NT... by bingbong · · Score: 0, Redundant

    better watch out for those NBT broadcasts....

    --
    "Omnis tuus capsa sunt inesse nos"
  33. Right... by TLouden · · Score: 1

    let them just hope they didn't install the optional WiFi option, or for that matter, any internet connection. And what about EMP? Or Microsofts Patented Random Error Generator System?

    "Sonar.exe has generated errors and will now be closed"

    --
    -Tim Louden
    1. Re:Right... by Lemmeoutada+Collecti · · Score: 1

      Microsofts Patented Random Error Generator System: MS PREGS - Bloated, Unhappy, often Bitchy, and always asking for some disc you just don't have

      (No offense to any females out there)

      --

      You can have it fast, accurate, or pretty. Pick any 2.
  34. Re:USB? by Lennie · · Score: 1

    W2K == NT5 (and XP == NT5.1 if I'm not mistaken)

    --
    New things are always on the horizon
  35. Windows 2000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows 2000 is still referred to as NT 5.0.

    It maybe just a typo by a non-geek. He has NT4 on his workstation where he typed this piece.

    I thought slashdot would no better. Check for blinders (linux) before posting.

    1. Re:Windows 2000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and XP is NT 5.1

    2. Re:Windows 2000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Build 2600 none the less ;)

  36. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  37. I want one by Paulrothrock · · Score: 2, Funny

    The first thing I'd do is wipe it and install Linux.

    --
    I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    1. Re:I want one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Dammit, we need supplies! Shore is only 5 minutes away, so let's go!"

      "For some reason, it's not recognizing the control panel hardware!"

      "WTF? Well, fix it!"

      "Ok, just lemme write a patch and recompile the kernel!" ...1 week later

      "Good lord... we're lost at sea in our own waters!"

      "I'll have it up and running within 5 more hours, this time I mean it!"

  38. Re:Even better... by David+Horn · · Score: 3, Funny

    Nope, it'll be bluetooth. Which means it won't work, and people will be able to steal its address book entries... ;-)

    "Ah'm sorry, Cap'n, for some reason the ship's wheel has paired itself with my mobile phone instead of the ship."

    --
    PocketGamer.org - For the gamer on the go!
  39. Pretty pictures ala Google cache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative
  40. They'll be easy to find by Black+Jack+Hyde · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just look for the ship running in circles in the middle of the North Sea. "Ensign Chef, I said CTRL-ALT-DELETE, now!" "Bork bork bork!"

    1. Re:They'll be easy to find by stephenisu · · Score: 1

      nah, just look for a big red glowing H on the bow. /Honda Ricer carbonfiber junkies unite!

      --
      Sigs? We don't need no stinking sigs!
  41. Amazing. by killjoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Amazing that a country would trust their armed forces to a piece of software made in another country.

    Of course I don't know the last time Sweden went to war but still.

    --
    evil is as evil does
    1. Re:Amazing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazing that a country would trust their armed forces to a piece of software made in another country.

      This happens all the time, including here in the US. obviously a country wouldn't use software from a country not "aligned" with them (i.e. the US is not likely to use any software developed in North Korea any time soon).

    2. Re:Amazing. by henrik · · Score: 1

      1814.

    3. Re:Amazing. by thorgil · · Score: 1

      last war about 200 years ago. ...

      --
      Warning: This sig contains a small bug. ==> *
    4. Re:Amazing. by dario_moreno · · Score: 1


      the above posters forgot the ominous swedish
      peacekeeping done for the UN in Katanga in the 1960s. One could see then that the Swedes are as barbaric as any other nation : flattening villages with aircraft and heavy artillery in a failed attempt to stop guerilla.

      --
      Google passes Turing test : see my journal
    5. Re:Amazing. by TeknoHog · · Score: 1
      Amazing that a country would trust their armed forces to a piece of software made in another country.

      Instead, they could use an OS born in Finland, the archenemy of Sweden ;)

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  42. USB Wooden Ship Wheel by suckass · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Last I knew, Windows NT didn't support USB devices.

    --
    blah, blah, blah
  43. EU AntiTrust settlement by pdcryan · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the EU - whose members are now using Windows servers to run their military hardware - will continue to push MicroSoft to release their source code to competitors?

    Sounds like the EU AntiTrust ship might just turn around, after receiving orders from EU defense brass. The type of people who wanted the "real" steering wheel might not be too excited in an open source battleship.

    --
    Ryan Kennedy opposes comm
  44. History by makkverk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This reminds me of another swedish warship which was said to be "a floating work of art and a weapon of war". It was called Vasa. Quoting the article: "...The Vasa sank within one nautical mile of the start of her maiden voyage in 1628 before she even left the Stockholm archipelago..."

  45. Not Surprisingly by smartin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Shortly after they installed nt, all the rats on the ship disappeared.

    --
    The difference between Canada and the USA is that in Canada healthcare is a right and gun ownership is a privilege.
    1. Re:Not Surprisingly by N3Z · · Score: 1

      Shortly after they installed nt, all the rats on the ship disappeared.

      replaced by bugs.

      --
      .signature not found
  46. Fiber Dust by Giant+Panda · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not that any hit is good, but imagine what will happen when this thing takes a hit of any kind or has a fire. Carbon fiber dust floats around like grain dust and the body likes it about as much as asbestos. When I was doing Fire Fighting for the US Air Force, occasionally, we would have the opportunity to cut into / chop up an F-16 that had made a "critical navigational error" and it was always respirator only work because of fiber dust.

    1. Re:Fiber Dust by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      Did you mean:

      "controlled flight into terrain"

      as say the civillian folks about a pilot that follows a beacon on the wrong altitude....

  47. Pictures and more info by Metatron · · Score: 2, Interesting

    can be found here.

  48. Stealth ship, my ass by leomekenkamp · · Score: 2, Funny

    Stealth ship, my ass. I'll believe it when I see it.

    Oh, wait...

    --
    Wenn ist das Nunstueck git und Slotermeyer? Ja! Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput.
  49. Pictures of Visby by bjornhi · · Score: 5, Informative

    The boat is named Visby and pics of it can be found here and here /Björn

    1. Re:Pictures of Visby by wizarddc · · Score: 1

      Thank Bjorn. I thought this ship was so stealthy, that pictures of it could not be taken.

      --
      Th
    2. Re:Pictures of Visby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct me if I am mistaken, but I see no place for shuffle board!

      Seriously though, what is the deal with this Stealth technology? Does that paint job really have anything to do with it or is just there to throw people off?

    3. Re:Pictures of Visby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No offense intended to anyone here, but not speaking the language, I was half afraid to click those links in case kockums.se was similar to goatse.cx

  50. Re:umm, Yes the cold war is over but.... by Mantorp · · Score: 1

    Worldwide piracy is still a big problem though I doubt there's much of it in the Baltic. This ship will be able to perform the Swedish Navy's annual sneak attacks on codfish and herring using anti sub bombs much more efficiently.

  51. Hope they do better than the US Navy did with NT by bingbong · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Back in May 1997, the US fitted the USS YORKTOWN (http://www.yorktown.navy.mil/ ) with NT and it had disastrous results (http://www.gcn.com/archives/gcn/1998/july13/cov2. htm ) . The ship went DIW (dead in the water) for a few hours. This is the worst case scenario for any ship's captain (and their career)...

    Guess it took this long to work out the bugs... Not bad - only 7 years!

    --
    "Omnis tuus capsa sunt inesse nos"
  52. dont tell me by falcon5768 · · Score: 1

    Im the only one who remebers the Navy's blue screen of death fiasco.

    --

    "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

  53. I can See it Now by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Excuse my lack of Nautical Terms, but you get the idea.

    Navigator: Captain, radar is picking up an iceberg 2 Nautical miles ahead, just off the port bow.

    Captain: No problem, that's plenty of time to steer clear.

    Captain clicks the navigation display on NT

    Clippy: It seems you are trying to steer, what would you like to do?

    • Steer Port
    • Steer Starboard

    Navigator: Captain, Icberg 1 mile ahead

    Captain: (showing frustration) clicks Steer Starboard

    Captain: This should handle it!

    Clippy: How many degrees starboard would you liek to steer?

    • 5
    • 10
    • 15

    Captain uttering swedish curse words, clicks 10 degrees

    Navigator Captain, Iceberg at 400 meters

    Clippy: You clicked Turn Starboard and 15 degrees, it seems you are trying to evade an Iceberg. Windows NE (Nautical Edition) has several new features, just for this.

    Clippy: Would you like to enable the "Evade Iceburg" Wizard?

    Captain: $^@#$#%*, runs up to the wooden ships wheel

    Captain: See, this is why the tried and true method works! turns the wheel

    Windows NE has detected a new device and is unable to find a driver for it.

    Captain: Aha! my son warned me about this, I have the driver right here!

    Windows NE: Windows NE has finished installing drivers for the device "Ships Wheel", in order to use this device you must restart windows. Click here to restart, or if you wish to restart later click cancel.

    Sharks: Break out the hotsauce fellas, here comes dinner

  54. Plastic is the right choice by Woogiemonger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If the Visby really does turn out to be more cost-efficient than a steel ship, some maritime analysts believe that it could be a matter of time before merchant vessels begin to be made from tough plastics.

    I've had a little yellow plastic duck toy that has been chewed into fervently by my pet dog for years and years, and the thing STILL stays afloat no problem. I think the Swedes are on the right track here.

  55. Problem!! by trompete · · Score: 2, Funny

    The problem with stealth ships on the sea is that they leave a blank spot on the radar where there should be echos for the waves.

    1. Re:Problem!! by Jott42 · · Score: 1

      If you think real hard you can probably see a solution to that...

      And that reminds me, Sweden also has a radar system that is able to detect stealth ariplanes, same principle.

    2. Re:Problem!! by AceCaseOR · · Score: 1

      IIRC, Patrick Robertson (author of various Naval techno-thrillers, ala early Clancy), posed a solution for this in one of his novels (I don't remember this one). The sub in question produced sound basically like standard ocean noise when it went into stealth mode (with a few alternates, like crunching ice if it was under an ice flow).

      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
    3. Re:Problem!! by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I'd never even heard of that? Does this radar system have a specific name?

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  56. Structural Integrity by cexshun · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd worry less about it running NT and more about it's structural integrity. They'll soon learn what many automotive enthusiates have learned. Although Carbon Fiber has it's advantages(light weight, looks cool, non-metal, etc), it also has several disadvantages. Carbon fiber tends to be very tempermental to temperature changes, and will crack easily with severe cold/heat. Also, although carbon fiber is fairly flexable, it's still brittle. It's doesn't crack when impacted, it shatters.

    1. Re:Structural Integrity by JanneM · · Score: 1

      They've been testing a preproduction prototype for over ten years now; I think they have a decent handle on the structural characteristics by now.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    2. Re:Structural Integrity by kill-9-0 · · Score: 1

      I would think that they might have consulted some materials engineers and structural engineers before they undertook this. They may have even tested it a bit, say ten years or so. I mean, I could be wrong, maybe they just decided one day "hey let's build a carbon-fiber ship" and they scrambled around for some spare carbon-fiber and built one. I'm sure there was one guy saying, "Wait, before we start, shouldn't we post on /. and see if this will work first?!?!?"

      While I'm not a materials engineer, I did take several courses in that discipline in college. There are MANY things one can do to mitigate the issues you've mentioned, I would wager they brought the experts in on this.

      --
      Liberalism...the next best thing to thinking.
    3. Re:Structural Integrity by titzandkunt · · Score: 1


      "I'd worry less about it running NT and more about it's structural integrity. They'll soon learn what many automotive enthusiates have learned..."

      Don't drink and drive? Don't brake past the apex of a curve? What the hell are you talking about here?

      "...Although Carbon Fiber has it's advantages(light weight, looks cool, non-metal, etc),..."

      Well I've got to hand it to you: That's a major factor in the choice of material for military hardware: It's got to look cool. I've heard they're going to start using that sticky film that looks like a carbon-fibre weave on Bradleys and and Abrahms so they look cool and demoralise the enemy - probably put a big Type-R decal on the back so they go faster too.

      "...it also has several disadvantages. Carbon fiber tends to be very tempermental to temperature changes, and will crack easily with severe cold/heat..."

      Cites? I'm looking at Design Data for Reinforced Plastics, 1994, (Chapman and Hall) and can see no corroborating statement.

      "...Also, although carbon fiber is fairly flexable, it's still brittle. It's doesn't crack when impacted, it shatters"

      Depends more on the matrix material. If it's an epoxy, the CF composites can exhibit brittle behaviour, if the matrix is PP, PEEK or PES, you get a tougher structure.

      Thanks for sharing your knowledge and insights, it's always a pleasure to get it straight from an expert.

      T&K.

      --
      Political language ... is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable...
    4. Re:Structural Integrity by mla_anderson · · Score: 1

      Ok let's assume you know what you're talking about with the carbon fibor properties. Let's also assume the navy just slapped it together without running tests.

      How much of a temperature change do you expect to see for a hull that is immersed in ocean water? At lowest it might see -5C, the highest 15C, a delta of 20C. That's not a significant temperature change for most materials.

      --
      Sig is on vacation
  57. USB + winNT: Why not? by Giant+Panda · · Score: 1, Informative

    Actually, you can get third-party cards and drivers that allow NT4 to use USB just fine.

  58. Warfishing? by FerretFrottage · · Score: 0

    So does the ship have to dock monthly to get windows updates? If it's stealth, it can't be using standard wireless 802.11 technology to get updates. Imagine all the new game for all those bored fishermen (fisherpersons?)---warfishing.

    Maybe the USS MS Dingy will ferry out updates to the cruiser.

    --
    "Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change."
  59. Unsinkable! by pinky99 · · Score: 1

    But has a blue screen another meaning on a ship?

  60. NT can be stable... by mobiux · · Score: 1

    Any OS can be stable out of the box. In my experience, the OS is fine, but it's some of the crap programs that cause instability.

    And I highly doubt the control system would be exposed to any wild internet.

  61. Where did they get NT for a new install? by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    NT isn't a current product, how did they get a copy of it. Instead of 2003, or XP.. ?

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Where did they get NT for a new install? by REBloomfield · · Score: 1

      New licenses have downgrade rights. You can only buy 2003 licenses now, for example, but we are allowed to run Windows 2000 on downgrade.

    2. Re:Where did they get NT for a new install? by dheltzel · · Score: 1
      They just installed a bootleg copy one of the ship's mates had on him. Lucky, huh?

      Wait until MS send the BSA to try to sue the Swedish Navy -- their vessel might be boarded by unfriendlies in the way in.

    3. Re:Where did they get NT for a new install? by value_added · · Score: 1

      The revelant quote from the article is

      "The Visby's stealth properties are not its only hi-tech component. The ship includes a command and control centre that uses a Windows NT operating system."

      I think it's fair to assume that "NT" is not "NT 4", but either NT5.0 or NT5.1 (Windows 2000 and Windows XP, respectively).

  62. Vulnerability? by !Freeky2BGeeky · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Ok, all jokes aside on the operating system that runs this thing, I'd like to know what happens in a real battle when this thing gets hit with ordinance?

    The article states that they had to create new techniques for cutting the material during construction, but if this gets hit with a mine/torpedo/exocet, will it shatter? If not, how would they fix the leaks w/o being able to weld a new piece of steel over the hole(s) to keep it afloat until it makes it back to the shipyard?

    --

    Visualize Whirled Peas

    1. Re:Vulnerability? by Mr.+Piddle · · Score: 2, Funny


      Just imagine a group of very nervous looking sailors waiting while one of them is mixing up a large batch of 5-minute epoxy.

      --
      Vote in November. You won't regret it.
    2. Re:Vulnerability? by phayes · · Score: 1

      The Visby is touted as being a very lightweight ship for it's size. It aims to avoid being hit if possible, by avoiding getting noticed or if discovered by running away at high speed. It's light weight & high rigidity due to it's fiber construction should also help in case of mines by allowing it to bounce away from shocks instead of absorbing them.

      The advantage to using a high pressure water cutter over other methods (like the diamond saw they alluded to in the article) is that it doesn't wear out. These water pressure saws are becoming the norm for cutting all relatively soft materials.

      You fix it same way you fix any other fiber+epoxy structure. Long ago, I had a 15 ft fiberglass boat that I almost literally cracked in two when jumping waves. I was lucky enough to bring it back to shore with a 3 ft crack on each side of the boat. I drilled a few holes in fore & aft of the cracks, bolted on a reinforced skeleton made of 2x4s, then applied layers of fiber & epoxy to reinforce it. It wasn't pretty, but the boat was stiffer afterwards than it was to start with. Other than the specific respiratory hasards that working with carbon bring, temporary repairs will probably use the same method.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    3. Re:Vulnerability? by Bluesman · · Score: 1

      >It's light weight & high rigidity due to it's fiber construction should also help in case of mines by allowing it to bounce away from shocks instead of absorbing them.

      Unfortunately, it doesn't work like that. Large ships have to be somewhat flexible so that they don't break under the stresses you mention. I've seen videos of destroyers in really bad weather where you can see the deck buckling.

      Interestingly, the best way to sink the ship is by creating an air bubble under the ship so that the ship falls in on itself and breaks in half. This is how torpedos are supposed to work. Simply puncturing the ship has little effect, especially on a warship.

      Finally, damage control on a ship mostly consists of closing off compartments and/or stuffing the hole with wood. There are also large rubber sheets that the crew can slide along the outside of the hull to cover larger cracks. It sounds ridiculously simple, but the idea is just to quickly stem the flow of water so the pumps can do their job. Welding doesn't enter the picture until much later.

      --
      If moderation could change anything, it would be illegal.
    4. Re:Vulnerability? by r.muk · · Score: 1

      No that would be impractical if for example the Visby were hit in mid-Atlantic. Can't drydock it there.

      I would guess the overlapping mats of carbon fibre would fail (on ordnance impact) as a small ragged hole - as opposed to a large torn aperture in the case of steel hull construction. And a small hole in carbon fibre would be easier to fix - for example send down divers over the side with Kevlar blankets and self-clinching fasteners - hull construction could even deliberately incorporate a grid on the outside of the hull - of hardpoints with embedded fasteners - specifically designed for this purpose.

  63. Fire Control by codepunk · · Score: 5, Funny

    Captain: Fire control, engage hostile target 1004 range 2000 yds with 5 inch main battery.

    Fire Control: Sir, unable to engage target 1004 the system has encountered a VB runtime error 91 object variable not set.

    Captain: Engine room ahead all full make turns for
    30 knots.

    Engine Room: Sir we keep getting a RPC failure in the gas turbine controller.

    Captain: All hands abandon ship!

    --


    Got Code?
    1. Re:Fire Control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Priceless

  64. carbon fiber.......... by CoffeeJedi · · Score: 1

    Captain of this ship to captain of other ship:

    yo dawg, i totally installed a carbon fiber hull, and check out the system, i replaced the stock head unit with a Windows machine! its mad tyte yo! now i'm gonna put a Type-R sticker on the back, trick out the propulsion system with NAWWWWWS and go huntin fer 'stangs, werd, peace out

    --
    May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage. RAmen.
    1. Re:carbon fiber.......... by CoffeeJedi · · Score: 1

      oh yeah, yeah, and check out this sweet aftermarket wooden steering wheel i got at Boat-zone g!

      --
      May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage. RAmen.
  65. Source of Wheels by BuffaloBill · · Score: 1

    You want a wooden wheel, well to start you can contact H&L Marine Woodwork, Rancho Dominguez, CA
    H_Lmarinewoodwork.com

    Let me know how it integrates.....it sure will be pretty.....

  66. Hope this works better for them... by sleepingsquirrel · · Score: 1

    I hope using NT works out better for them than it did for the U.S. Navy

  67. Dangerous by leandrod · · Score: 1

    I for one don't want to be near a MS WNT-run vehicle, much less such a lethal one.

    --
    Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
    DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
    GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
  68. NT? by adl99 · · Score: 1

    Nah, it's called Windows for Warships. It's even got a customised clippy... "It looks like you are trying to fire an intercontinental ballistic missile? Would you like me to f*ck it up for you?"

  69. Instructions for using the forward cannon by iPaul · · Score: 4, Funny
    10.1.3Initializing the Cannon for Rapid Fire

    During combat it becomes necessary to increase your rate of fire to ensure the destruction of enemy vessels. Microsoft does not endorse the use of this software on fishing boats, pleasure craft, or walruses.

    From the Control Panel select "Forward Cannon." Right click on the cannon and select "Properties." From the "Firing Rate" tab make sure the "Fire at will" option, and click the apply button. If the ship does not begin firing type "Regedit" at the command prompt. Under "HKEY_CLASSES_LOCAL_MACHINE" search for "Fire Control" and make sure the is a "Fire Control" entry in the registry. If necessary, load the Forward Cannon 1.3 install CD and double click the fcannon.reg file.

    Once the cannon is installed, you may choose to test-fire a round. You will be prompted with a dialog asking if the target was hit. Clicking on No will take you to a web page with possible reasons (non of which will actually apply) as to why the target was missed. Some targets are not compatible with Windows and cannot be hit with the forward Gun.

    --
    Leave the gun, take the cannoli -- Clemenza, The Godfather
  70. This absolutely make sense by toupsie · · Score: 1

    What else would you use on a stealth ship? The color of water in the ocean is "blue" and the most typical color of a Windows NT server monitor is blue from the BSOD. If the Swedes ever get in combat say against Iceland, Santa Claus or Greenpeace and they find that they need to hide from their enemy, they can just launch Internet Explorer, cause a BSOD by clicking on the address bar and blend in to the deep blue sea.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
  71. Weighs twice as much by kahei · · Score: 4, Funny


    From the article:


    And if it is detected, the Visby should be quick enough to escape as it is only half as light as a conventional corvette.


    In other words, its great weight makes it _more_ likely to avoid attacks -- perhaps by escaping downhill.

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
  72. The Good, The Bad and the Ugly by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The good: A lightweight, stealth ship. I'd love to have one. I have no need for one, but it would be cool. (I'd rather have a lightweight, stealth car, esp. if it came with a retractable 57mm cannon!) Do we have any idea how well CF will really hold up in this case, though? Both in long term maneuvers and under attack by enemy aircraft? What about barnacles? OK, the good we don't know for sure.

    The bad: Let's see, didn't the US Navy already experience a problem with an NT4-based ship being dead in the water? And a dead ship can't maneuver. If there are other ships around, that's not a good time to be invisible. (Captain of aircraft carrier: "What was that crunchy sound?")

    The ugly (editing): "And if it is detected, the Visby should be quick enough to escape as it is only half as light as a conventional corvette." Presumably they meant half as heavy!

    1. Re:The Good, The Bad and the Ugly by AceCaseOR · · Score: 1
      The bad: Let's see, didn't the US Navy already experience a problem with an NT4-based ship being dead in the water? And a dead ship can't maneuver. If there are other ships around, that's not a good time to be invisible. (Captain of aircraft carrier: "What was that crunchy sound?")

      Well, if you're that close, you can probably see the bloody thing (you're only invisible to radar & sonar), steer around it, shoot it if you have deck guns, or call someone who does if you don't.

      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
    2. Re:The Good, The Bad and the Ugly by TheCabal · · Score: 1

      The bad: Let's see, didn't the US Navy already experience a problem with an NT4-based ship being dead in the water? And a dead ship can't maneuver. If there are other ships around, that's not a good time to be invisible. (Captain of aircraft carrier: "What was that crunchy sound?")

      You're assuming that people don't learn anything in 6 years.

    3. Re:The Good, The Bad and the Ugly by BigBadBri · · Score: 1
      I'd rather have a lightweight, stealth car, esp. if it came with a retractable 57mm cannon

      Better not fire those things if you're being tailgated, sonny boy - they'll stop you quicker than a set of Brembos!

      --
      oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
    4. Re:The Good, The Bad and the Ugly by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Actually, I seem to recall that the problem was that the program running on top of NT4 didn't validate user input properly.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  73. non-reciprocal by moviepig.com · · Score: 1
    If Windows goes down, they will still be able to steer.

    So, the ship doesn't go down with the captain.

    --
    Seeing bad movies only encourages them. Watch responsibly
  74. It Can't be steel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a mine sweeper. I'm sure there's a joke here somewhere..

    1. Re:It Can't be steel by dustmote · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's a mine sweeper. I'm sure there's a joke here somewhere..


      I know I'm going to karma hell for this joke, but....

      In Soviet Russia(socialist Sweden?), Minesweeper runs Windows!

      --


      -1, "1337" speak
    2. Re:It Can't be steel by bgarcia · · Score: 1
      LOL!

      That was actually a good one, and not entirely expected! Kudos!

      --
      I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
    3. Re:It Can't be steel by cibus · · Score: 1

      :-D

  75. the French have already got a stealth one by dario_moreno · · Score: 2, Funny

    It might be the one pointed out by the Guinness book cited in the article, hence the various James Bond jokes as well as the Taiwan interest ; indeed, the french stealth frigate appears at the beginning of the last (or before-last) 007 movie, and it was sold to Taiwan by Thomoson , giving rise to a huge financial crisis. The frigate is however not made of carbon.

    I hope the frigate has a lower radar signature than a 1970s Volvo...

    --
    Google passes Turing test : see my journal
    1. Re:the French have already got a stealth one by AceCaseOR · · Score: 1

      It was in the third-to-last Bond film (Tommorow Never Dies). There have been two more films (The World is Not Enough & Die Another Day), since then.

      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
  76. Prior Example USS Yorktown by Analogy+Man · · Score: 1, Redundant
    Navy's pilot of a MS based smart ship ended up dead in the water!

    USS Yorktown dead in water

    --
    When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.
    1. Re:Prior Example USS Yorktown by Analogy+Man · · Score: 1
      Sad. I take the time to validate my source before posting and I go from informative to redundant.

      10:50 +5 Informative

      10:55 -4 Redundant

      --
      When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.
  77. duh by NineNine · · Score: 1

    Well, I can only assume that for something this important, they've been building it and testing it for several years...

  78. I'm sure there is support... by Kjella · · Score: 1

    ...but not in the "NT doesn't work with gadget/program foo.bar 2000" sense. For a stripped down military installation, I'm sure there's support options.

    I don't know of anyone offering commercial support for say the 2.0.x kernel either, but if someone wanted to use it in a battleship, I'm sure the support would appear. Microsoft isn't dumber than that they'd offer it too.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  79. building materials by MikeHunt69 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    People have been building boats from fibreglass for a long time. There is no difference between working with CF and working with fibreglass - it's just that CF is stronger and more expensive (and thus more difficult to cut).

    Also, if you use the technique the Sweedes used (sandwich expandable foam between two CF layers), the hull is alot more buoyant than a steel hull - which means you can change the shape (within reason) to a more stealthy version.

    Modification would be a bitch though! If you want to weld a new bracket to a steel hull it takes 5min from the inside or a few hours to do externally. If you try the same thing on a CF hull, it takes a few hours (12?) for the CF resin to go off. Forget trying to modify the exterior hull without a drydock. Also, in the event of wartime damage repairs you can weld a new plate over the hull and have it watertight and you are good to go. No chance with CF - it needs a completely dry environment (assuming you even have enough raw CF & resin in the first place - you can't just reuse old sections)

    1. Re:building materials by drexelmike · · Score: 5, Informative

      Emergency repair isn't an impossible situation to handle. There are plenty of epoxy resin systems that have short (15min) cure times. While I can't imagine that they'd have time to properly vacuum bag it in an emergency, it's not the end of the world if a patch is a bit resin-rich. A simpler and more likly alternative is the use of a room temprature curing pre-preg patch. While it would require refrigerated storage, it's a simple peel and stick solution. These are commonly used in auto racing marketed under the "RhinoPatch" brand name. they gel in 30 seconds and cure in under a minute.

    2. Re:building materials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's just that CF is stronger and more expensive (and thus more difficult to cut)

      Now, why does being more expensive make it more difficult to cut?

    3. Re:building materials by MikeHunt69 · · Score: 1

      Well, it's strength makes it more difficult. I should have written it in a different order (expensive, stronger).

    4. Re:building materials by Zoshnell · · Score: 0

      For the same reason thats diamonds are so hard to cut. See when you wad money hard enough, it becomes magical and thus very difficult to cut, requiring many men with Vorpal Swords chipping at it under a weeks worth of full moons. And that kids is how we won the Great Martian War. Now go get me some turnip juice!

      --
      "Do you suppose that's why God lives in the Heavens? Because he lives in fear of His creations?" - Steve Buscemi
  80. this is good planning by b17bmbr · · Score: 2, Funny

    since they know NT will crash, they have already planned ahead. good job. now, send us your bikini team.

    --
    My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
  81. CIA by AcmeShells.com · · Score: 0

    I find it weird that so many Gov agencies use Windows NT.

    The CIA uses WIN NT.

    Oh shit whos that at my door...

    --

    AcmeShells.com The cheapest Eggdrop
  82. Wooden steering wheel by Tree131 · · Score: 1

    They just don't want to get accidentally electrocuted from the metal wheel when the power comes back on... since everything else on that ship is probably non-conductive...

  83. Mis-read the title... by Deal-a-Neil · · Score: 1

    .. thought it said "Carbon-Filter" Stealth Ship. I was thinking,

    Gee, what military strength -- the most powerful Brita water filtration system to rule the seas. Taste the difference.

  84. obvious question by ajrs · · Score: 5, Funny

    does it have minesweeper?

  85. GET RID OF FRICKIN' WINDOWS!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's how they fix the problem. Trash the whole Windoze system and install Linux or MacOSX or BSD or some other flavor of Unix.

  86. Ship's Wheel by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

    Bungie demoed its "Pimps at Sea" game with a USB ship's wheel.

  87. No one has asked this so i will... by kzeddy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why do the swedes need a stealthy warship?
    I think they will make a play for their empire

    1. Re:No one has asked this so i will... by zazas_mmmm · · Score: 1
      Q: Why do the swedes need a stealthy warship?

      A: To sneak up on Norway!

      --
      I'm a friend of a friend of the working class.
  88. Obligatory... by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

    Imagine a Beowulf cluster of- Not in the face NOT IN THE FACE!!!

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  89. Stockholm, we're going down! by Brush+Master · · Score: 1

    If Windows goes down, they go down. All in the same boat, remember?

  90. ...more trusth, less bashing.... by cball2k · · Score: 0

    more ms bashing food for the bandwagon riding linux noob kiddies (and the self apointed bandwagon hate-mongers from slashdot)

    slashdot, the ms bashing site, where linux flaws and bugs are ignored...

    if the mods want to ban me, fine, only shows I am right, and the only defense they have is censorship of the TRUTH!

    --
    karma, hah...
  91. IMO Hardly News by ericlp · · Score: 1

    Agree. Also, today, ships running MS products in critical applications is hardly news.

    1. Re:IMO Hardly News by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I remember getting an interesting tech support call back in 1998. A naval officer was attempting to get Windows NT Server running and was wondering if we could help. (We were business support and her husband worked for our business.) Apparently all of her regular outlets for support were shut down for the weekend (or maybe it was a holiday, I don't remember) and she needed to get the computers running on time for the deadline. We didn't support NT Server, so I really couldn't help her.

      When I passed the story on to coworkers, they didn't entirely believe me. After all, why would the Military use NT computers for mission critical applications? Then about a month later, the story of the USS Blueridge hit the presses. I was vindicated! :-) Too bad the Blueridge didn't fail. It might have given the Admirals the idea that NT computers were a bad idea for naval warfare. Instead they had to go and refit an entire ship (the Yorktown) that later had to be towed back to port.

      With any luck, they've learned enough that the USS Ronald Regan won't be suffering systems failures anytime soon.

    2. Re:IMO Hardly News by wayward_son · · Score: 2, Funny
      With any luck, they've learned enough that the USS Ronald Regan won't be suffering systems failures anytime soon.


      It should be fine, as long as the memory stays good.

    3. Re:IMO Hardly News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your story is BS. The US Navy has an Alliance Support contract with Microsoft. The people assigned to the Navy are on call 24x7. Even if they didn't have the support agreement, anyone can call MS 24x7 and speak to a support engineer.

    4. Re:IMO Hardly News by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Your story is BS. The US Navy has an Alliance Support contract with Microsoft

      Since when? I did receive a call from a lady purporting to be an officer of the US Navy. This leaves three possibilities:

      1. No such support contract yet existed.
      2. She was not a staff member who knew how to obtain that support (she was working on a day off, remember).
      3. She simply wasn't who she said she was.

      Even if they didn't have the support agreement, anyone can call MS 24x7 and speak to a support engineer.

      In the end, that was more or less what I recommended she do. My guess is simply that she was inexperienced with NT systems and didn't know who to call. It had seemed odd to me that she hadn't at least tried Microsoft support, but she probably assumed they'd be closed.

      I certainly can't prove it happened, but I can tell you everything I remember. If you don't believe me, well... *shrug*

    5. Re:IMO Hardly News by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      And....as long as it isn't on the NMCI network...if so, we're all toast....

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    6. Re:IMO Hardly News by four12 · · Score: 2, Funny
      anyone can call MS 24x7 and speak to a support engineer

      MS: Microsoft Technical Support, how may I help you?

      Navy: This is the USS Ronald Reagan, we've had a critical malfunction in our navigation systems. It says something about "0X0000A000AB" or something... we need help!

      MS: OK, we'll need a PO or credit card to charge the call to.

      Navy: Umm. It's after hours and there's nobody who can cut a PO?

      MS: Can you use a credit card?

      Navy: Mine are maxed out, and the OOD just finished filing for banruptcy after a nasty divorce, so his credit is screwed.

      MS: Thanks for calling Microsoft, have a good day! [click]

    7. Re:IMO Hardly News by g-san · · Score: 2, Interesting

      On the topic of tech support calls, I got a call from a ship in the IT-21 project. While we were going through the standard, "what's the IP address of ..." I got a reply I didn't expect:

      Me: Ok, now whats the loopback IP address on the other end?
      Navy Dude: Uh, that's classified.

      There was one guy in our group that had the proper security clearances to work in both the classified and non classifed networks. I know of at least two multi-week trips he got to take on an aircraft carrier. Talk about actually wanting to go on-site for a change!

      And I doubt that the wooden ship wheel is USB, NT doesn't support USB.

    8. Re:IMO Hardly News by b17bmbr · · Score: 1

      where are my mod points when i need them!!! laughing my ass off!!!(holy crap, that's the funniest post since some natlaie portman, soviet russia, dead bsd post. ha ha ha.)

      --
      My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
  92. question by Johnny5000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't know anything about this, which is why I ask...

    I RTFA and it mentions being less visible to radar, infrared, etc but says nothing about sonar detection. Isn't sonar a big way of tracking warships? Is this still going to be vulnerable to that?

    --
    The libertarian solution to the failures of capitalism is to apply more capitalism til the failures are fixed.
  93. Wrong Dept? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "from the ctrl-alt-del-to-log-in dept." ...should that have been:
    "ctrl-alt-del-to-captain's-log(again) dept."?

  94. I doubt it will be NT for long. by -cman- · · Score: 5, Interesting

    According to what little info is avialable from Janes The ship is one of two which were initially ordered in 1995. Military procurement being what it is, no matter where you go, the ships were probably designed with NT in mind, circa '95. However, I doubt NT will last longer than the first refit or post-sea trials.

    The US and UK navies are both experimenting with a number of computer-control options ranging from MS solutions, to various *nixen. Of course there is the now aporcyphal story of the NT crash that put the USS Yorktown dead in the water. Short answer, it may have been built on the NT platform, but lots of replacement systems exist now and I doubt NT will survive long enough for the ship to enter the active list.

    --
    "Being Irish, he possessed an abiding sense of tragedy which sustained him through brief episodes of joy." -W. B.
    1. Re:I doubt it will be NT for long. by Pidder · · Score: 1
      from the link: The Swedish Government has ordered two YS 2000 stealth surface effect ships. Sweden is planning the first all-stealth navy by commissioning up to 28 stealth ships over the next 15 years.

      I'm swedish and I find that HIGHLY unlikely. Military funds have cut back alot lately. There's no way in hell we will have 28 stealth ships in 6 in years.

    2. Re:I doubt it will be NT for long. by -cman- · · Score: 1

      Oh, certainly. Remember that article was from 1995.

      --
      "Being Irish, he possessed an abiding sense of tragedy which sustained him through brief episodes of joy." -W. B.
  95. Code Red! by Marcus+Erroneous · · Score: 1

    I hope that their version of Battle Stations isn't Code Red. ;) The constant scanning that Code Red causes will give away their position. Then again, they'll take down all other ships in the area that are using Windows, so it might prove to be a more effective attack platform that we're giving them credit for! ;)

    --
    You must be the change you wish to see in the world - Ghandi
  96. KaZaa by wxjones · · Score: 1

    Of course!

    --
    My SIG is a P226
  97. WinNT doesn't support USB by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    You insensitive clod!

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  98. What? Since when did 'Nerdism' mean 'OS Elitist' by dwaggie · · Score: 1

    I was actually more interested in learning about the Stealth capabilities than the fact it was running NT. When did Slashdot become a source purely for OS considerations? ;)

    NERDS UNITE! PRESERVATION OF COOL TECHNOLOGY! ;)

  99. And of course, Clippy is included! by NeuroManson · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hi, I noticed you're attempting to open fire. Would you like to:

    A: Declare war!
    B: Send a bouquet of flowers?
    C: Trigger the ship's self destruct?
    D: Open the e-mail attachment titled "HotPix.pif"?

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  100. Viola? Celllooo. by druxton · · Score: 1

    Perhaps you meant voila
    (yes, there should be an accent on the a - too lazy to look it up).

    1. Re:Viola? Celllooo. by kernelfoobar · · Score: 2, Funny

      Voilà!

      --
      Here we go again!
    2. Re:Viola? Celllooo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no the long vilon

  101. DLA's run windows by g0qi · · Score: 1

    Actually windows runs rather well on embedded devices. I remember using Win2000 on my last job - it was on a DLA! (Digital logic analyzer) by Agilent.

    Perhaps it's the added benefit of a tried and tested system - been around for years and most of the bugs have been patched/found/fixed.

    But I'm sure they have some special deal with MS. Money would hardly be an issue for them (fas in forking it out for licenses), so perhaps the only reason for picking MS over Linux would probably be some level of support promised by MS (or even publicity).

    --
    Yea. I know.
    1. Re:DLA's run windows by Tree131 · · Score: 1
      NT is no longer supported by MS. In fact, the Swedish navy probably saved on licensing.

      Then again, they started the project back in the 90's when 2000 was still in development. They probably developed all their apps to run on NT (read 16-bit) and didn't want to port them to Win2K or Win2K3, or ran into some sort of backwards compatibility.

      No one writes exploits for NT anymore. A fine example is the Sasser worm - it didn't affect NT systems, only Win2K or later.

  102. BSOD ?? no WSOD ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forget

    Blue Screen of Death

    we now have

    War Ship of Death

  103. Sigh... English.... by Quixote · · Score: 2, Insightful
    From the article:
    And if it is detected, the Visby should be quick enough to escape as it is only half as light as a conventional corvette.

    So.... is it twice as heavy as a conventional corvette?

  104. New meaning for old phrases... by aminorex · · Score: 2, Funny

    Military use of Windows NT will likely bring new meaning to the old phrase "blue screen of death".

    --
    -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  105. Sea Shadow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Amazed nobody has mentioned this. The US has had a stealth ship for quite a while now - a direct spinoff of the Stealth Fighter/Bomber program. http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship/sea_shadow .htm for a few more details. Don't think it runs NT though!

  106. Rum, sodomy and the lash by druxton · · Score: 1, Informative

    Is also a pretty good Pogues album.

  107. Picture by evilberg · · Score: 1

    http://www.marinen.mil.se/article.php?id=2596 And i guess the U.S Movie Industrie will never se the difference between German people and Swedish. This whole 'Helga' BS is getting boring.

    --
    Going Berserk.
  108. Gives a whole new meaning... by TheLevelHeadedOne · · Score: 0

    to Blue Screen of Death....

    --

    Twin or more? ITA
    Apache/Spring/La
  109. Is it me... by Decameron81 · · Score: 1
    "If Windows goes down, they will still be able to steer"


    Is it just me or does that sound like "When Windows goes down, they will still be able to steer"?
    --
    diegoT
  110. Re:Hope they do better than the US Navy did with N by science_gone_bad · · Score: 2, Funny

    Here's a signature that I used for a while for this very ship:

    In days long gone, the captain used to go down with his ship. Now that Windows NT is running Navy warships, the ships go down all by themselves.

    --
    "I never get lost because everybody tells me where to go"
  111. Who would have said... by carvalhao · · Score: 1

    ... that WinNT would become such a popular war gaming plattform?

  112. Don't forget . . . by Idou · · Score: 1

    the wooden steering wheel.

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
  113. Does it have screen doors? by Sgt_Jake · · Score: 1

    Don't laugh, it keeps the fish out...

    (sorry, couldn't help myself)

    1. Re:Does it have screen doors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      screen door + submarine = teh funny
      screen door + warship = wtf?

  114. Re:Hope they do better than the US Navy did with N by spectecjr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Back in May 1997, the US fitted the USS YORKTOWN (http://www.yorktown.navy.mil/ ) with NT and it had disastrous results (http://www.gcn.com/archives/gcn/1998/july13/cov2. htm ) . The ship went DIW (dead in the water) for a few hours. This is the worst case scenario for any ship's captain (and their career)...

    Funnily enough, both the commanding office and the officer in charge of that project went on the record to state that the problem was not with NT.

    How many OS crashes do you know which can be fixed by - and I quote - "replacing the value in one of the fields with something other than zero"?

    If the OS had crashed, you would not be able to replace the value in the field.

    God you slashdot guys are sheep. Don't you ever check the veracity of the crap that you spread?

    --
    Coming soon - pyrogyra
  115. Old Tech by PPGMD · · Score: 1
    Lockheed Martin Skunk Works built a stealth ship during the 80's for the Navy (violating Kelly's Johnson's unwritten 15th rule, Don't Work with the Navy), but the Navy didn't want it because of politics.

    For the Surface Warfare guys prestige is a big deal, a traditional cruiser has a crew of 100 on duty at anyone time, the Sea Shadow had a on duty crew of 4, and a total compliment of 10. That and the ship (and it's crew) would have been top secret killed the program. But would have helped the Navy IMO.

    With the Sea Shadow taking the picket air defense role, they would have had 200+ sailors that they could have put in other roles, for example the Arsenal ships.

    I am truly surprised that another nation would start a stealth ship program, since primarily it would have only have a war time, during peace keeping operations stealth is all but worthless.

    1. Re:Old Tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course Kockums built a prototype (Smyge) which was launched in 1991 to test the concept. The project was started in 1986 which seems to be about the same time as the Sea Shadow got started. It even has the same general appearance as the Sea Shadow. The Swedish navy needed new larger corvettes more suitable to ocean travel anyway, so why not make them stealth ones?. The old corvettes are too small and only meant for operations close to the coastline.

      To make the Visby visible during peace time they just mount a few radar reflectors on the outside. Then, if you want to be invisible again, you just bring them back inside.

    2. Re:Old Tech by PPGMD · · Score: 1
      To make the Visby visible during peace time they just mount a few radar reflectors on the outside. Then, if you want to be invisible again, you just bring them back inside.

      Why would they do that? I said that the stealth is worthless in peace keeping operations, I didn't say that the ships needs to be visible. Simply that being stealth served no practical purpose.

  116. ff? by aLEczapKA · · Score: 1

    just wondering... does the wooden wheel have force feedback support?

    --
    -- All Gods were immortal.
    -- S. Lem
  117. Not all licneses allow downgrading by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    You must have an enterprise license, ( which of course I'm sure they do have... ) but I still believe you are encouraged to upgrade to current versions, via a 'grace period'. Small business or retail customers don't get this 'privilege'

    That may have changed, its been a while since I've touched an enterprise MOLP. They are evil.

    ( actually the main post was more of a joke.. not to be taken too seriously )

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  118. Weird stories this week. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First a story about the Mexican Air Force. Then a story about the Swedish Navy. I can't wait for Friday's piece on Luxemburg's Army and their Linux distro.

  119. Re:Nice Try by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice try on the redirect. There ain't no way my work computer will let me go to a site with the work kock in the title!

  120. In socialist-capitalist hybrid Sweden... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...minesweeper runs Windows!

  121. Picture of an Invisible Ship? by MetroSlug · · Score: 1

    Don't know why the editors didn't include the image, but here's the image of the ship http://homepage.tinet.ie/~steven/images/visby3.jpg .

  122. Re:Hope they do better than the US Navy did with N by wtf · · Score: 1

    The operation timed out when attempting to contact www.yorktown.navy.mil.

    Looks like they still haven't got over their NT toothing problems.

  123. water jet by SpyPlane · · Score: 1
    "...It [Carbon Fibre] is so tough that Kockums had to develop the cutting technology to build the Visby. "We had diamonds in the beginning but they were destroyed after a very short time," says Göthe. "What we use now is an extremely high pressure water jet. I think it is a bit incredible but a water jet is better."

    Finally something that can get the coffee stains out of my mug!

    --
    "We need a fourth law of Robotics: Stop Fingering My Wife"
  124. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  125. Here's a picture by ImTwoSlick · · Score: 1
    Here's an ascii picture of the stealth ship:

  126. Very nice tech ... but by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 0

    Does it run Li... o ... ok ...

    --
    WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
  127. Re:umm, Yes the cold war is over but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The american navy perhaps? :-)

    More seriously, the article states the swedish navy routinely cooperates with other NATO and EU navies, so international missions would be assumed.

  128. They should have copied the US Navy by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1

    and went with Linux on Apple Xserve's. I know I would fee much safer in a submarine running on more robust PPC hardware then x86. And just about any OS is more stable then NT 4. What were these people thinking? It had to be a big political stunt. Some MS goons lobby some Swedish politicians, and wham, you have yourself a new sub "powered by NT"(tm).

    --
    If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
    it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    1. Re:They should have copied the US Navy by stefpe · · Score: 1


      As a Swede I'll tell you that on average, Sweden is probably the most MS-loving country on the planet, possibly apart from the US, but I wouldn't bet on it.

      Though I agree with what you're saying of course. Or they could've used Solaris, QNX, VxWorks or whatever.
      Oh well. It's not like this thing is more than an expensive high tech toy for the navy to play with anyway.

  129. It doesn't raise that very question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I'm sorry to say that the whole story can't raise the "USB wheel" question, since Windows NT doesn't support USB.

    So there. :p

  130. French already surrendered the ship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NT

  131. info and facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More info and facts here:
    http://www.fmv.se/index.asp?K=005003&L=se
    The link that says "Bilder Visbykorvetten" will take you to a picture gallery.

  132. USB Wheel by sanguivore · · Score: 1

    Windows NT does not support USB

  133. Meaning of life... by spiryt · · Score: 1

    I suppose that gives Blue Screen Of Death a new meaning :)....

  134. Anyone else read the title as... by DavyByrne · · Score: 1

    Swedish Carbon-Fiber Stealth FISH Runs NT

    I must have Swedish Fish on the brain...

  135. Re:What do the Swedish need a ship for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Yes the Swiss are landlocked but:

    Swiss - people from Switzerland
    Swedish - people from Sweden

    American geography education....

  136. Damn! by cavemanf16 · · Score: 1

    The Poles with their ridiculous screen doors on their submarines, and now the Swedes running Windows NT on their ships! What is this world coming to?!

    An Extract from the Windows NT license agreement
    This is an extract from the Windows NT license agreement... (there wasn't any copyright on the license agreement...)

    [...]

    7. NOTE ON Java SUPPORT. THE SOFTWARE PRODUCT CONTAINS SUPPORT FOR PROGRAMS WRITTEN IN Java. Java TECHNOLOGY IS NOT FAULT TOLERANT AND IS NOT DESIGNED, MANUFACTURED, OR INTENDED FOR USE OR RESALE AS ON-LINE CONTROL EQUIPMENT IN HAZARDOUS ENVIRONMENTS REQUIRING FAIL-SAFE PERFORMANCE, SUCH AS IN THE OPERATION OF NUCLEAR FACILITIES, AIRCRAFT NAVIGATION OR COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL, DIRECT LIFE SUPPORT MACHINES, OR WEAPONS SYSTEMS, IN WHICH THE FAILURE OF Java TECHNOLOGY COULD LEAD DIRECTLY TO DEATH, PERSONAL INJURY, OR SEVERE PHYSICAL OR ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE.

    [...]

    Damn! And I was so looking forward to managing my nuclear arsenal with Java....


    No, but the Swedes are! Run for the hills!

  137. Not vulnerable to hackers? by pherris · · Score: 1
    From the article:
    The ship includes a command and control centre that uses a Windows NT operating system. The Swedes insist that this will not make the vessel vulnerable to hacker attacks, although the navy will not be drawn on the potential for the system - armed with hi-tech cannon and missiles - to crash.

    Yeah, not vulnerable? Just wait until some dumb ass downloads "Bonzi Buddy". "You're a WINNER! Click here to launch a missle!"

    It also redefines the term "spyware."

    --
    "And a voice was screaming: 'Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?'" - HST
  138. True stealth... by theendlessnow · · Score: 2, Funny
    ...by stench.

    If you really want to keep people away from it, run NT 3.51.

  139. Drop out. by Stumbles · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Apparently the Swedes did not learn from the US Navy's experience of using NT to run the ship. Not a good thing to be dead in the water because a computer crashed. IIRC, in Microsoft's EULA it specifically says not for use in critical systems.

    --
    My karma is not a Chameleon.
  140. But actually... by kevinadi · · Score: 1

    in a comment that's sure to get lots of bashing, a properly hardened NT is actually very stable. I've seen one NT firewall that survived power outages multiple times with no error whatsoever. That, and heavy traffic from inside and outside.

    The trick for a stable NT is the installation process. MS tends to give default installation of NTs with lots of irrelevant apps (who in the hell actually uses Paint in servers?)

    I hate MS as much as the next poster in slashdot, but hate to say this, NT is actually a pretty good OS if properly administered. Most NT hater I've seen usually comes from UNIX background. They tend to make NT crash because default install of NT is quite unsecured.

  141. Marketing folks strike again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [...] the first of the Visby Class corvettes [...]
    Shouldn't it be, um, the Invisby?
  142. That figures. by Stumbles · · Score: 1

    Just goes to show how reliable Windows products are..... and how antiquated they are that can be backed up using a WOODEN WHEEL. LOL.

    --
    My karma is not a Chameleon.
  143. Booze cruise... by isaac · · Score: 4, Funny

    Stealth is a waste of money for the Swedish Navy anyhow; it seems this ship's mission, like all other seagoing Swedish vessels, is to sail back and forth between Stockholm and Helsinki in order to give Swedish people a place to buy cheaper booze than System Bolaget.

    -Isaac

    --
    I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. For Entertainment Purposes Only.
    1. Re:Booze cruise... by henrik · · Score: 1

      Stop being such an uninformed American Isaac. You know better.

    2. Re:Booze cruise... by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the NZ Navy's stealth ships

      Only 3 frigates listed? That's coz the rest are super stealthy undetectable ships...

      --
    3. Re:Booze cruise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Reminds me of the NZ Navy's stealth ships
      Not only stealthy, but their names are encrypted!
    4. Re:Booze cruise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jag hoppas att Isaac är amerikan, då må han vara förlåten för sin särskrivning, särkilt av svenska ord, men må hin håle äta levern på den svensk som ägnar sig åt dylikt förbannat ofog!

      "System Bolaget"? Aaaargh!

    5. Re:Booze cruise... by azi · · Score: 1

      Stealth is a waste of money for the Swedish Navy anyhow; it seems this ship's mission, like all other seagoing Swedish vessels, is to sail back and forth between Stockholm and Helsinki in order to give Swedish people a place to buy cheaper booze than System Bolaget.

      Why to bother. I live in Helsinki and I could suggest to sail between Stockholm and Tallinn in that matter. Booze is much cheaper in there. =)

      --

      bash: sig: command not found

    6. Re:Booze cruise... by isaac · · Score: 1
      Jag hoppas att Isaac är amerikan, då må han vara förlåten för sin särskrivning, särkilt av svenska ord, men må hin håle äta levern på den svensk som ägnar sig åt dylikt förbannat ofog!

      Yes, I'm an American. I forgot it was spelled Systembolaget. My bad.

      I didn't catch the rest - something about swedish people with holes eaten in their liver?

      -Isaac

      --
      I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. For Entertainment Purposes Only.
    7. Re:Booze cruise... by Mictian · · Score: 2, Informative

      While the comment is funny, it doesn't have much to do with reality. The reason there are so many passenger ferries sailing between Stockholm and Helsinki is the tax-free shopping. You get the cheap booze from the ship, not from ashore.

      Helsinki actually has (and has traditionally had in the past) higher alcohol prices than Stockholm. Very few people in their right minds would travel from Stockholm to Helsinki to buy booze from Helsinki, instead they buy it tax-free from the ship.

      The whole tax-free status of the ferries will be removed within 5 years (or sooner, I can't recall the specifics) due to EU regulations, unless I'm mistaken. And that is why the ferries currently do a very brief visit at the Åland island (to sustain the status until the transition period expires).

      Another relating matter is the recent lowering of the alcohol tax and thus prices in Finland. Which was (and had to be) done because Estonia joined the European Union at the beginning of May.

      Estonia's capital Tallinn offers alcohol at a fraction compared to the prices in Helsinki, and with a lot of boats and ferries going between the cities daily (there must be one leaving about every 15 minutes), "alcohol turism" would have skyrocketed unless they had cut alcohol taxes. It'll still probably increase substantially, it's just too early to get actual statistics yet..

      --
      "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure of the former" - Albert Einstein
    8. Re:Booze cruise... by isaac · · Score: 1
      While the comment is funny, it doesn't have much to do with reality. The reason there are so many passenger ferries sailing between Stockholm and Helsinki is the tax-free shopping. You get the cheap booze from the ship, not from ashore.

      Yes, I know. That's what I was humorously implying vis-a-vis the "Swedish Navy." One generally doesn't take the trip on one of the numerous ferries for the purpose of actually going to the destination; it's all about the tax-free shopping on the ship. Certainly the fleet of Baltic ferries serving this market exceeds the tonnage of the real Swedish Navy. That's why the joke was funny (I thought, anyhow).

      -Isaac

      --
      I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. For Entertainment Purposes Only.
    9. Re:Booze cruise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't catch the rest - something about swedish people with holes eaten in their liver?

      Since Swedes nowadays don't get to learn how to read and write in school, and with the pervasiveness of the Internet, the vast immigration of people with no interest in ever integrating with or even acknowledging Swedish (or European, for that matter) people and culture, and the total reliance on word processor spell checkers, we no longer seem to know how to write Swedish nouns.

      Too many people with Swedish as their mother tongue would actually write "System Bolaget" instead of "Systembolaget". Likewise, stores have signs saying "fråga vår kassa personal" (which an automatic spell checker would say is correctly spelt, but it means "ask our worthless staff") instead of "fråga vår kassapersonal" ("ask our cashier staff"), and so on.

      I said that Americans may be excused for this mistake (just as I hope that any English linguistic mistakes of mine will be forgiven here), but Swedes who do the same should have their liver eaten by "hin håle" (an olden euphemism for "the evil one").

      Here endeth today's lesson.

  144. Or I will replace you with a very small... by SwornPacifist · · Score: 1

    I would be careful about making fun of the NT OS if you're onboard the ship, otherwise the captian might replace you with a very small conscript!

  145. Good news for game designers by ddtstudio · · Score: 1

    Sad, but my first thought upon seeing the pictures is that the teams designing the next generation of naval combat sims are scratching their heads, or maybe amused that it turns out Battlezone really was a vision of the future.

  146. Microsoft owns Sweden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bught it long time ago.

  147. Modern warships by RetiredMidn · · Score: 1
    actually all naval vessles made in the last 60 years are a joke compared to the real battleships of WW-II

    I'm not sure I agree, given the changing nature of warfare and weapons, but it reminds me of a tour of a new (Spruance class?) destroyer I was given as a midshipman at the U.S. Naval Academy in the seventies. The tour guide pointed out the limited weaponry and the aluminum superstructure, then enumerated the extensive electronic detection gear, concluding: "that means she can't fight worth a damn, but we'll know exactly who's blowing us out of the water!"

    1. Re:Modern warships by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      The tour guide pointed out the limited weaponry and the aluminum superstructure, then enumerated the extensive electronic detection gear, concluding: "that means she can't fight worth a damn, but we'll know exactly who's blowing us out of the water!"

      Look on the bright side. At least CIC is happy...

      Ten seconds before they bite the dust. ;-)

  148. So this ship can be damaged with a water pistol? by Tran · · Score: 1

    Albeit it would have ot be very high pressure water pistol.... I wonder if this will lead to new wepaons technolgy based on water pressure... Bring out the SuperSoakers!

  149. No Problem for USA with ServicePack 4 by NoSuchGuy · · Score: 1

    Was it SP4 with the famous NSA_key?

    So the NSA already has access to the onboard kitchen menu!

    --
    Grundgesetz * 23. Mai 1949 - 30. November 2007 - http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/
  150. Camouflage by Shoten · · Score: 1

    They're taking advantage of NT's numerous "features." You see, the blue screens blend in with the color of the ocean. The crashing is by design after all!

    --

    For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
  151. The only good thing about running NT by luguvalium2 · · Score: 1

    The only good thing about running NT, is that Linux, BSD, and other better OSs will run on the same hardware.

    Here is another good link:
    http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/vi sby/

  152. Gnarly Paint Job, but... by TimTheFoolMan · · Score: 1
    ...how often does the thing sail in an ocean of paper mache'? (See this pic.)

    Tim

  153. USB Steering Wheel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Should be no problem.
    Wooden steering wheel for ships are available in many shops.
    The wheel sensor of a mouse provides the input device.
    A custom HID device (USB) is easily built.

  154. Which side wins? by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 2, Informative

    Put them on one side. Take the HMS Ark Royal, a small aircraft carrier from the modern Royal Navy. Put that on the other side. Which side wins?

    The German in the Type XXI submarine packing active and passive SONAR, accoustic and wireguided torpedoes with power assisted loading, a truely effective whisper mode that defeats allied passive sonar and accoustic torpedoes and the capability to remain submerged for days on end? The Royal Navy got a very rude shock when they finally got their hands on one of them. Thankfully these boats came to late but they are the early ancestors of modern subs.

    --
    Only to idiots, are orders laws.
    -- Henning von Tresckow
  155. So in a battle with... by kleinux · · Score: 1

    a US stealth bomber, who would win? Or for that matter, who would find whom first?

  156. How will they fix these things? by xyote · · Score: 1

    Have you ever looked at how conventional warships are made (I've toured thru BIW). There is a lot of welding. A real lot. These ships usually have one or more machine shops on board and everything is fixed with a pipe wrench or by welding. I can just see the machinist's mate taking an oxyacetylene torch to the ships carbon fiber frame.

  157. To whoever modded me as informative.... by kzeddy · · Score: 1

    Thnx, but i was going for funny.

  158. Now it makes sense!!!!!! by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 1

    The blue screen of death will blend right in with the water!

    Brilliant!

  159. 9LVMK3E - id est the NT4 box in the ship by priich · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The combat managment system here,9LV Mark3E from celsiustech/saabtech, is already in common use. I think they have sold some 50 systems to like 8 or 9 countries and i haven't heard of bluescreen issues yet. Here's a link (in english) to the product. 9LVMK3E

  160. WindoZ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sadly the Stealth capabilities are not quite as good as you'd think since there is a HUGE 'Designed for Microsoft Windows NT' metalic sticker covering both sides of the ship. I sure hope they keep this yacht patched up.

  161. Linux Warships by baldcamel · · Score: 1

    Imagine a linux warship. Each captain / officer could bring their own distro and boot it off the cd. The only real question would be to run it from the command line or not. And think of the support avail able to the ships crew via mailing lists and irc.

    And could you imagine a beowulf cluster of these things?

  162. Wooden wheel by VAXGeek · · Score: 1

    If you get a USB wooden wheel, you're probably going to have problems finding a driver for NT...

    --
    this sig limit is too small to put anything good h
  163. Looks to me... by scootr1 · · Score: 1

    ...like Escher designed it. ;)

  164. Wanted: MCP by I.AM.BLORT · · Score: 0

    Minesweeper Certified Professional needed for mission critical environment, Fast paced , high stress. solitaire skills optional.

    applicant must show proficiency on a minesweeper field of 2394781203471029347823 squares wide by 32104987123458913240129348 across.

  165. I love moderation by ad0gg · · Score: 1

    Lets Flamebait someone that told what the article really stated that the ship was dead in the water because of experimental software that wasn't written by microft. It had nothing to do with windows and even captain testified to this. You can keep covering eyes and say Windows is unstable but reality it isn't, reply with your contradictions but its meanless since windows is being used by everything. If Windows wasn't stable no one would use it. Its in atms, cars, boats, game consoles and sterios.

    --

    Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

    1. Re:I love moderation by virginia-geek · · Score: 1

      If Windows wasn't stable no one would use it. Its in atms, cars, boats, game consoles and sterios.

      It's even used for spell checking. A lesser known fact in this case.

    2. Re:I love moderation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but when you mix the terms 'mission critical' and 'dead in the water' then you've done something very very very wrong. To even use the term 'mission critical' implies that a failure of a single component won't bring the whole system crashing down.

      Now, in reality, a single failing component crashed the NT OS. The NT OS was another single component, and upon its crashing, the ship was dead in the water. The fault lies on the people who designed a braindead OS that wasn't fault-tolerant, and on the engineers that designed a braindead system that wasn't able to function upon the failure of the braindead OS.

      NT has it's uses, that's not at question here. But lets not pretend that it's some swiss-army-knife that fits anywhere and fixes everything.

    3. Re:I love moderation by the+chao+goes+mu · · Score: 1

      I am not a Windows basher, but I have to disagree with one point. Windows IS unstable. Ok, with XP it doesn't blue screen often (3-4/month), but it does crash the explorer and reload my desktop about once every two days. My non-windows box (FreeBSD... yeah, yeah is dead, yadda yadda yadda) has been up since I installed it. The fact that 3-4 BSOD a month is an improvement argues that stability is not Windows' strong suit.

      --
      Boys from the City. Not yet caught by the Whirlwind of Progress. Feed soda pop to the thirsty pigs.
    4. Re:I love moderation by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      The fact that 3-4 BSOD a month is an improvement argues that stability is not Windows' strong suit.

      The fact is that 3 - 4 BSODs a month is not normal. Heck, if I got 3 - 4 BSODs a *year* I'd be dissatisfied and looking to fix the underlying problem(s), which is almost certainly going to be (physically or programmatically) broken hardware and/or dodgy drivers and/or dodgy third-party low-level software.

      Instead of complaining about the problem, fix it. If other people can manage to use NT systems with no BSODs, you should be able to as well.

    5. Re:I love moderation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NT has it's uses, that's not at question here. But lets not pretend that it's some swiss-army-knife that fits anywhere and fixes everything.

      I have a feeling you've never posted that with regards to Linux fanboy spew.

    6. Re:I love moderation by zero_offset · · Score: 1

      Well said.

      We have Win2K boxes at my office which are only rebooted when major pieces of software change. They're on isolated test LANs so we don't even worry too much about updates unless it directly affects something we're doing. One set in particular stayed up and running for more than six months -- all while supporting developers connecting via TS to do dev & testing on SQL2K and IIS/ASP.

      My XP boxes at home are never rebooted except for the occasional service pack. It isn't unusual to notice that my home desktop hasn't been rebooted for a couple of months. (Even driver updates and many Windows patches no longer require reboots.)

      The last true BSOD I saw was when my stashed-in-a-closet Win2K Pro MP3 server box didn't take kindly to a new NIC driver I installed about a year ago. That's another box which is NEVER shut down. Right now it's been up and running continuously for probably close to a year, serving up files almost 10 or 12 hours a day on most days.

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

    7. Re:I love moderation by the+chao+goes+mu · · Score: 1

      I would agree if Windows did not sell itself as an out-of-the-box, user-friendly solution. The truth is, out of the box, without any active management, using default settings my BSD machine has never crashed, where my factory pre-installed Windows machine crashes regularly. This does not fit well with their image as user-friendly. In fact, your arguments sound more like the Gentoo zealots: "I never have problems, you must be doing something wrong. The One True OS can not be at fault."

      --
      Boys from the City. Not yet caught by the Whirlwind of Progress. Feed soda pop to the thirsty pigs.
    8. Re:I love moderation by the+chao+goes+mu · · Score: 1

      Apologies to the Gentoo folks for singling them out in the last post. It was just the first LInux distro that came to mind. (They are pretty vocal on slashdot.) Should have said "Linux (and Mac and BSD and BeOS and Amiga...) zealots". The point is still the same, "I can do it, so you should too" doesn't mean a problem doesn't exist.

      --
      Boys from the City. Not yet caught by the Whirlwind of Progress. Feed soda pop to the thirsty pigs.
    9. Re:I love moderation by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      I would agree if Windows did not sell itself as an out-of-the-box, user-friendly solution.

      There is a limit to the guarantees the software can provide on its own.

      The truth is, out of the box, without any active management, using default settings my BSD machine has never crashed, where my factory pre-installed Windows machine crashes regularly.

      And I have whole offices here full of out-of-the-box XP machines that never have stability problems.

      This does not fit well with their image as user-friendly.

      As previously mentioned, there's a limit to what they can do without any control over the hardware.

      In fact, your arguments sound more like the Gentoo zealots: "I never have problems, you must be doing something wrong. The One True OS can not be at fault."

      That's not what I said. I was just pointing out that if the problem really was with the OS, then *everyone* would have the same problems and none of use would be able to run the stable Windows machines that we do.

      I've yet to witness a Windows (NT) stability problem that couldn't be narrowed down to dodgy hardware, bad drivers or poorly written software running with high privileges and in the case of the first two, at least, easily remedied.

    10. Re:I love moderation by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      The point is still the same, "I can do it, so you should too" doesn't mean a problem doesn't exist.

      Likewise, "X isn't working", when X relies on the correct functioning of dozens of other parts does not mean the problem is with X.

  166. That seems like a nice waste of money... by LilGuy · · Score: 1

    Seriously.. why would they go to the effort to create a top-of-the-line warship when the time comes that they NEED it, it will no longer be top-of-the-line? It will be just your average joe ship or possibly worse. Why not just build what's cheap now, and build that ship when it's cheaper later?

    Then again I suppose you have to account for the fear/bragging options.

    --

    You're nothing; like me.
  167. Dating ourselves by wodelltech · · Score: 1

    How come none of the younger croud are asking about the whole bork bork thing. I haven't seen The Muppet Show in years (at least 10).

    My recollection of the song:
    e bork urstay
    oom ba dinky doo
    e bork urstay
    oom be um bork bork bork

    --
    Your monitor is staring at you.
  168. Not a real-time OS by tiger99 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    It makes me sick to see how often fools, imbeciles and idiots attempt to use an OS which has no real-time capability whatsoever to do real-time work.

    NT is known for freezing for periods of up to 10 seconds (maybe more?) at random intervals, quite probably while it defrags the mess it has got its memory into. The same problem happens with Win2000 and I have also seen longish freezes in XP. Controlling a ship, or anything lese for that matter, needs hard real time.

    Not only that, in most countries, evidently not Sweden, the software would have to be capable of validation and verification to a suitable standard, that can of course only be accomplished if you have source. The currently fashionable standard assigns criticality levels Sil1 to SIL4, now NT can't even meet SIL1 (SIL4 is the highest, mandatory in life-threatening situations). Previously, lots of people followed the aircraft industry in assigning levels 1,2,3,4 or A,B,C and D (in these cases 1 or A was required in potentially life-threatening cases). An extra level, Z, was introduced, guess why?

    I once upon a time thought that the Swedes were generally competent, however with the JAS39 Grippen, and now this, I think that their defence industry has become a complete joke. I could tell you about their SAAB civil aircraft, fortunately they are out of production now.....

    1. Re:Not a real-time OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear that North Korea is developing nukes using Windows ME...

      Fear!

    2. Re:Not a real-time OS by Penguinshit · · Score: 1


      "I could tell you about their SAAB civil aircraft, fortunately they are out of production now....."

      Did they have their ignition keyholes on the floor, too?

    3. Re:Not a real-time OS by tiger99 · · Score: 1
      Don't know about that, but the systems I was once familiar with were not exactly examples of good engineering. They had no proper EMC standards, and bad electrical bonding between the skin panels, so flying in mediocre conditions used to cause milions of minute electrical discharges that zapped some of the avionics and crashed the computers in others. Then there was the fly-by-wire rudder, introduced as an emergency measure when the SAAB 2000 was found to be uncomfortably heavy for the pilots..... I have never heard of such a radical change being introduced towards the end of a flight test program.

      Basically, getting it right requires good cooperation between the airframe manufacturer and the avionics suppliers, and good engineering competence on both sides, same as procuring anything technical, so that the customer, in this case SAAB, actually gets what he needs, not what he thinks he wants. It evidently did not happen. At a much later date, I was involved in fixing some of the problems, so I do know. It could have been done right, or nearly so, the first time, if they had got their requirement specifications somewhere near correct.

      Sadly it is a familiar story, lots (but still a minority) of engineering projects go badly wrong because the requirements were ill-defined or kept being changed at too late a stage. Windoze is a fine example of the latter, every version seems to suffer creeping featurism right up to the end. If Sir Bill was acpable of rigorously defining his requirements at the beginning, and not changing them at random, his progrtammers might be able to get it more nearly right. And yes, Sir Bill is to blame personally, his title is "Chief Software Architect", it is his job function that is being done incompetently.

      Oh, just remembered, I did drive a SAAB belonging to ny boss once, can't remember where the ignition key went, but the gearlever knob kept coming apart in my hand, it seemed to be made from an excessive number of pieces. Most people use a simple, reliable solid ball with a tapped hole, but SAAB had been too clever....

    4. Re:Not a real-time OS by linhux · · Score: 1

      What about the JAS 39 Gripen? Have you compared it's track record to any other fighter aircraft? Or do you in fact know anything about it except those crash-and-burn images everyone's seen? Just because a crash happens in front of TV-cameras doesn't mean it isn't rare. From what I heard, it has got fewer incidents that any other new aircraft (and better perfomance than most).

    5. Re:Not a real-time OS by tiger99 · · Score: 1
      It actually has a worse track record than most, but my opinion is based on first-hand experience of some of its avionic systems, which are rather ill-conceived. The explanation for the cause of the second accident was also somewhat incorrect, showing that they did not really understand the issues with the flight control computers, but these are not the bits I have direct experience of. Yes, it's performance is quite impressive, for a pile of junk.

      Don't get me started on Eurofighter (or a few other things)....... Suffice it to say that the Swedes did slightly better, certainly in terms of project management. IMHO the JSF approach is better than either, there is a lot less gross stupidity by systems designers, they are making positive efforts to keep it simple and use existing commercial technology.

  169. I can see the headlines now... by ioexcptn · · Score: 1

    "First Linux-based Battleship Built, And Darl McBride Claims He Owns It"

    --

    Intelligence is like four wheel drive, having it just means you'll get stuck in more remote places.
  170. In other news... by wramsdel · · Score: 0

    The Swedish navy makes its big-screen debut with "Das Reboot".

  171. how is it possible by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Funny

    how is it possible for something that broadcasts NBT all of the place to be considered "stealth"? :P

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    1. Re:how is it possible by isorox · · Score: 1

      how is it possible for something that broadcasts NBT all of the place to be considered "stealth"? :P

      It runs windows, 90% of the time it will be rebooting after running windows update (or being infected with sasser) and therefore not broadcasting

  172. God help us all... by Honkytonkwomen · · Score: 2, Funny

    ....if this ever becomes a remotely controlled "spam zombie".

  173. Link to the ship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a link to kockums, the builder of the ship. Visby

  174. Hack it! by Genevish · · Score: 1

    Can someone post it's IP address so we can show the folly of using MS products?

  175. USB & NT by kyoko21 · · Score: 1

    Don't forget Windows NT does not support USB officially. So no USB wheel for you... :P

  176. Another group that didn't read the EULA by mabu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    7. note on java support. the software product may contain support for programs written in java. java technology is not fault tolerant and is not designed, manufactured, or intended for use or resale as on-line control equipment in hazardous environments requiring fail-safe performance, such
    as in the operation of nuclear facilities, aircraft navigation or communication systems, air traffic control, direct life support machines, or weapons systems, in which the failure of java technology could lead directly to death, personal injury, or severe physical or environmental damage.

    Interesting that they pawn this all off on Java and not anything having to do with Microsoft.

    1. Re:Another group that didn't read the EULA by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      First of all, that's probably part of the required Java EULA.

      Second, I doubt they're using off the shelf copies of NT.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    2. Re:Another group that didn't read the EULA by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      OTOH, I doubt that they've made changes that fundamentally improve reliability.

      Of course, that doesn't mean that Linux is necessarily a better choice. :-) Both OSes are awfully complex.

      Actually, you know, Microsoft's bundling of software, despite the competitive advantages ("This isn't a web browser, your honor -- it's an operating system") has some PR disadvantages. When there is a security breech, the press reports that *Windows* has a security problem, and the entire system becomes tainted by association (granted, there's no way to remove Internet Explorer or friends, but it still sucks for the Microsoft developers that wrote completely unrelated code and still catch flak). In the Linux world, you wouldn't hear that "Linux has a security hole". You'd hear that "Samba has a security hole" or "sendmail has a security hole". Much easier to sell. Granted, that's partly a real-world benefit -- I don't have sendmail on any of my systems, and use postfix instead -- but some of it is sheer PR from name association.

  177. great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but does it pass the elk test?

  178. stealth? what kind of stealth? by LifesABeach · · Score: 0

    from the looks of it, the vessel in question appears to be a non-threat('nt?) for sonar, and radar based targeting systems.

    i'm considering that thermal, and optical targeting systems will have no problems at all.

    from a logistical point, foggy days look like 'good' days.

    1. Re:stealth? what kind of stealth? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      from the looks of it, the vessel in question appears to be a non-threat('nt?) for sonar, and radar based targeting systems.

      i'm considering that thermal, and optical targeting systems will have no problems at all.


      Optical & Thermal detection range == Deck fired weapons range

      In other words, the Visby will know you're there, but you won't know she's there until you've got a few missiles heading your way.

  179. The trojan that crashes the ship at will by DuckDuckBOOM! · · Score: 1

    A handwritten note to the CIA reading "Just wait a few hours".

    --
    Life is like surrealism: if you have to have it explained to you, you can't afford it.
  180. I wonder by bl8n8r · · Score: 1

    If the Titanic was running NT.

    --
    boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
  181. And Linus? by Teun · · Score: 1
    THe use of Windows is amazing considering Linus Torvald's native tongue is Swedish...

    From the Swede's I would have expected a little more trust in his product (even though he's a Fin).

    But then someone else explained the budgetary problems of the Swedish armed forces so I suspect it was all financed by Redmond.

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  182. Almost invisible? by serutan · · Score: 1

    lighter and faster than a conventional ship and almost invisible to enemy detection.

    As long as the enemy isn't in an airplane looking out the window.

  183. No effective military? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's because half of them are at the Vatican.....wearing funny costumes!

    1. Re:No effective military? by Tiro · · Score: 1

      no that's the swiss guard

  184. The usual story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When development descitions is trusted to a bunch of baffoons in suits with no education or clue whatsoever what they're doing - just following the latest buzzwords. The "IT" industry needs to grow up.

  185. Let's hope it never goes into combat ... by dougmc · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Carbon fiber is indeed really really strong, but it's a serious bitch to repair. A shell that hit the ship would make a nice big hole (carbon fiber is pretty brittle -- I wonder if they've got a kevlar shell outside of it, or would that mess with the radar signature?) of splintery mess.

    I guess rather than welding it they'd be using epoxy to repair? At least that's what we do with R/C planes that use carbon fiber (well, usually you replace the carbon fiber completely when it breaks -- not an option for a ship made of it.)

    1. Re:Let's hope it never goes into combat ... by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I guess rather than welding it they'd be using epoxy to repair? At least that's what we do with R/C planes that use carbon fiber (well, usually you replace the carbon fiber completely when it breaks -- not an option for a ship made of it.)

      Maybe they use individual plates that can be replaced one at a time.

      Emergency repairs would be a bitch, though.

  186. Good Trade by Wasuremon0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dear Sweden,

    After a lot of careful consideration, we, the people of the United States of America have decided to propose a collaboration of sorts.
    For every swedish woman we are sent in good health and of legal age we will send one well-trained High School computer dork to assist with your new warfare projects. Our computer nerds are by far the most experienced in dealing with BSODs and downloading new drivers for your ships. They are also content with being paid in meatballs, as it is rumored that yours are of top quality. Send all inquiries as to where to send women to Wasuremon0.

    We look forward to making the world a better place with you,
    -The USA

  187. NT 5.x by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Yes, but who outside the IT world even know that is the case, let alone use it in conversation? Not many.

    Most business types would just look at you funny.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  188. ip address by r4d1x · · Score: 2, Funny

    i gotta find the ip to this thing. wonder if they have AV installed or if i could slip BO2K or netbus in. that would be 1 hell of a remote control boat.

  189. OK, enough jabs at NT by lgordon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    NT is one of the only operating systems the FDA approves for class 2 (and higher, I think) medical devices. It's funny to say Windows NT bombs out all the time, but that's mostly because of driver issues. The fact remains that for embedded/turnkey applications, NT is about as stable an OS as you can get. It got that job by replacing OS/2 (in ATM software, etc) not by replacing a UNIX platform.

    Mod me down if you want, but you know it'd be abusive, and this is totally on-topic.

    1. Re:OK, enough jabs at NT by m.h.2 · · Score: 1

      [ NT is one of the only operating systems the FDA approves for class 2 (and higher, I think) medical devices.. ]

      That's because the time it takes the FDA to validate/approve *anything* is longer than the number of Slashdotters in line to kick Darl McBride in the nuts. They'll be approving Windows 2003 at the release of Windows 2215.

  190. Question for a Materials Geek by chadjg · · Score: 1

    Wasn't there some kind of Kevlar-like fiber used in the frame of the craft that carried Spirit and Opportunity that was selected specifically for it's low temperature performance? I think I remember that it was a relatively new specialty material.

    Of course if the Baltic gets as cold as space, they better concentrate on installing stealth skates on the Visby.

    --
    Why do I have this? I don't smoke.
  191. Re:Hope they do better than the US Navy did with N by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are a "slashdot guy", sheepie.

  192. Half-Assed Guide to a Stealth Navy by sharkey · · Score: 1

    Now grab your metal stucco Stealth Ship. If you don't have a metal stucco Stealth Ship......Use carbon-fiber stucco Stealth Ship!


    Now parge the ship.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  193. Davy Jones' BSOD by sharkey · · Score: 1

    Nuff said.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  194. conditional security by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    "If Windows goes down" -> "when Windows goes down", as anyone who's ever run Windows surely knows. And in this case, not only does the captain go down with the ship, the ship goes down with his network.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  195. Plastic by jlockard · · Score: 1

    Since when is "carbon fiber" a super strong "Platic"?

    --
    --JLockard - "Some mornings, it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps." - Emo Phillips
  196. The bowsprit by markian · · Score: 1

    Then the bowsprit got mixed with the rudder sometimes....

  197. Grammar nazi alert by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    If someone passes a law against the ship, I imagine it will still keep afloat... wait, did you mean ordnance?

    Sean

    1. Re:Grammar nazi alert by r.muk · · Score: 1

      Laws are passed by elected bodies in full session.

      Ordinances are passed by governments - which are a subset-by-appointment (of an elected body like a Central Government or a State Legislature); and ordinances do not require a full session of the elected body to be held.

      That swastika needs polishing, Sean.

  198. On sonar... by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    Sonar detection is mostly done from surface ships vs. subs, subs vs. subs, or subs vs. surface ships. There are two types: active & passive. Active sonar is when the searching ship transmits a ping into the water, and listens for reflected pings. From the timing and direction of the reflected ping, you can tell where the target is. Both carbon fiber and traditional steel hulls can be fitted with countermeasures that dampen reflections (think rubberized tiles mounted to the hull), but neither is particularly stealthy to reflected sound without them. Passive sonar is when the searching ship listens for frequencies likely to be emitted in the course of normal operation of the ship. For example, US ships emit a 60 Hz line from the sound of their electric generators (while European ships emit 50 hz lines from the same equipment). Again, both types of ship can be fitted with countermeasures that minimize the transmission of sound from the ship into the water (think rubber bushings/isolation mounts on your generators), but neither is particularly stealthy without them. Bottom line: carbon fiber probably doesn't make much difference in sonar detection. Sean

  199. Outlaw Bandit by sean.peters · · Score: 1
    For an interesting read on earlier US efforts to stealth-ify its ships, take a look at this Federation of American Scientists site.

    Sean

  200. Their NT system can easily crash: by master_p · · Score: 1

    ...by the famous NT console bug.

  201. Re:Hope they do better than the US Navy did with N by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

    Funnily enough, both the commanding office and the officer in charge of that project went on the record to state that the problem was not with NT.

    How about this?

    Here's the relevant text from their outline:

    Source of the Bug:
    Who is to Blame?
    Windows NT:
    Anthony DiGiorgio, a civilian engineer with the Atlantic Fleet Technical Support Center in Norfolk
    Ron Redman, deputy technical director of the Fleet Introduction Division of the Aegis Program Executive Office
    The crash was caused by the inability of the OS to properly handle division by zero.
    "Using Windows NT, which is known to have some failure modes, on a warship is similar to hoping that luck will be in our favor," DiGiorgio
    Redman agrees with him, but he is more careful in casting blame
    Why?
    Who is to Blame?
    The application program:
    Lieutenant Commander Roderick Fraser, the chief engineer on Yorktown at the time of the system shut-down
    Harvey McKelvey, former director of navy programs for CAE Electronics
    "The fault was with certain applications that were developed by CAE Electronics in Leesburg" Fraser
    "If you want to put a stick in anybody's eye, it should be in ours." McKelvey
    They didn't use the right version of the software - the latest version would have prevented this problem ...

    "Because of politics, some things are being forced on us that without political pressure we might not do, like Windows NT" Redman


    While I have a hard time finding data on exactly what was done during the fix (I get the impression that the Navy was a bit closed-mouth about all of this), it seems that a reboot was part of the procedure.

  202. The entire Defence force runs NT by Pysslingen · · Score: 1

    The army, air force and navy all run NT in Sweden. Having been a communications technician as a conscript I was trained in NT and worked with it while stationed in Kosovo. There are plans to move to something else, indeed, we did user XP on welfare computers. This was possible because of the number of bundled licenses th army had aquired over time. Not a wish to invest in XP infrastructure. Running NT was a lot of work, especialy on "field" hardware which fromm the start required specialised drivers. We did however use UNIX a little, SCO UNIX. =)

  203. Yes, a real problem by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
    The problem with stealth ships on the sea is that they leave a blank spot on the radar where there should be echos for the waves.
    The parent (quoted above) was modded 'Funny', but actually it's (mostly)quite true. When the USN built that stealth catamaran thingy, they found that it's wake was quite visible to certain radars, even though the ship itself was not.

    The joker in the deck however is this; The radar involved is a high frequency short ranged radar normally used to search for submarine periscopes and masts. The general rule of thumb for EW work is that you can detect an active sensor twice as far as he can detect you. (Simple physics, if a radar is bouncing off something ten miles away, the signal actually travels twenty miles to reach the receiver, ten miles to and ten miles back.)

    This results in a difficult tactical problem for the stealth vessel. It can 'hear' the searching enemy, and develop a track and possibly a target solution. However to fire on the enemy, or to send a signal to vector in other assets, it has to break stealth. If it breaks stealth, it can be detected. If it manages to kill the target before the target gets off a contact report, the fact that a hunter failed to return tells the hunters boss that *something* is hostile, active, and in the hunters assigned area.

    Stealth isn't magic, and simply killing a nearby enemy may not lead to a desireable outcome.

  204. Re:umm, Yes the cold war is over but.... by StrongAxe · · Score: 1

    Worldwide piracy is still a big problem though I doubt there's much of it in the Baltic.

    If they had insufficient valid NT licenses, would be obliged to hoist the Jolly Roger?

  205. It can't be that stealthy ... by muck1969 · · Score: 2, Funny

    with Windows NT's swap file usage.

    And another thing, does that mean they now require admin rights to access advanced features of the ship ... or do they just use it in safe mode all the time?

    --
    m.mmm..myyy ... sssissxxxtthh bbboottle offf mmmmmoouunnnttain ddeeewww.. in thhe pppassst ffffif
  206. Mod parent down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The good: A lightweight, stealth ship. I'd love to have one. I have no need for one, but it would be cool. (I'd rather have a lightweight, stealth car, esp. if it came with a retractable 57mm cannon!) Do we have any idea how well CF will really hold up in this case, though? Both in long term maneuvers and under attack by enemy aircraft? What about barnacles? OK, the good we don't know for sure.

    Right...like the rest of us wouldn't want one, too. Why in the world would you post something as dumb as this?

    And Jesus Christ, boy, that was incoherent. Have you taken your Ritalin today?

  207. USB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not to be picky, but...

    "Which raises the question: where can I get a USB-compatible wooden ship's wheel for my computer?"

    Windows NT doesn't support USB natively!

  208. Re:Hope they do better than the US Navy did with N by spectecjr · · Score: 1

    http://www.gcn.com/archives/gcn/1998/november9/6.h tm

    ""Now that we know what can happen, we've realized how to bring the
    system back quickly," Petty Officer 1st Class Phillip Cramer said. "All
    we have to do is change the zero to any number, and everything comes
    right back up.""

    --
    Coming soon - pyrogyra
  209. Re:USB? by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1

    And server 2003 is NT 5.2

    --
    I'd rather be lucky than good.
  210. Fleet defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > "AEGIS or no AEGIS, defence against over-the-horizon anti-ship-missile attacks is nearly impossible."

    True, if all you have is a missile cruiser. But proper fleet defense uses overlapping layers. You start with an aircraft carrier whose interceptors and AWACS planes can detect and engage intruders hundreds of miles from the fleet. If any get through, there's the AEGIS umbrella to deal with. And failing that, ships have shorter-range surface to air missiles, Phalanx close-in weapons systems (Vulcan-style guns), and as a last resort, chaff dispensers.

    True, all this can be overwhelmed by a massive enough attack, but I don't know of any potential enemy navies that could do this to a full US Navy fleet today.

    This reminds me of Tom Clancy's novel "Red Storm Rising". The USS Nimitz carrier battle group was crossing the Atlantic. A squadron of Soviet Backfire bombers attacked the fleet with anti-ship missiles from extreme range. The bombers turned around, leaving the Nimitz's F-14 Tomcats to deal with the mess. The Tomcats used up their Phoenix missiles and managed to stop the attack. Then another wave of Backfires came along, this time launching real missiles (the first volley were decoys). The Tomcats were helpless, the missiles got through, and the Aegis cruisers used up their own missiles without hitting all the "vampires". In the end a couple of smaller ships were sunk and the Nimitz was hit by two missiles, but stayed afloat.

    Still, this is all academic. When's the last time you saw an Aegis cruiser shoot in anger?

  211. Closed hull? by rjasmin · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who has a problem with the closed hull? From my experience, if you try to sail in poor weather, the last thing you need is not being able to see the horizon. Being violently sick is not one of the options on a warship...

  212. NT? by iminplaya · · Score: 1

    'While the point-and-click system is popular with conscripts, the ship was fitted with a wooden ship's wheel at the insistence of senior officers.

    While PS2 is popular with the conscripts, the ship was fitted with NT at the insistance of the senior IT staff.

    --
    What?
  213. Forget about steering... by h_thrilz · · Score: 1

    Blue screens aside, what about worms? Does the Win NT system link with communications? We've read here how a worm was found in the safety systems of a nuclear power plant. At least it's a submarine hunter and not a nuclear submarine...

  214. Re:Not a real-time OS -- not so if done right. by Doug+Coulter · · Score: 1

    I've done hard real time in NT and various other Windows versions. Whether you can do it depends somewhat on the peripheral hardware and of course the needs. One very HiFi soundcard I designed and built had plenty of ram (256kx32) to have plenty of input and output buffering, for example. This card didn't need or use interrupts or dma at all, and even the opsys going to sleep for awhile (the pentium pause we called it) didn't affect the correct flow of full duplex audio through the card. You just have to design things correctly. Smart peripherals rock if done right. The host CPU didn't have to respond audio sample by sample, but in blocks of 4k stereo samples, which took about 2% of it's time to transfer on the ISA bus using rep outsd or rep insd. The on card cpu took care of keeping all the realtime sample by sample timing straight. With several seconds of buffering possible, we never had problems, even on 486 machines.

  215. Rum, Sodomy and the Lash by Infosquawk · · Score: 1

    Churchill apparently never actually made this statement, although he said he wished he had:

    See the Churchill Centre:

    http://www.winstonchurchill.org/i4a/pages/index. cf m?pageid=112

    --


    OoO

    Please do not publish outside of /.
  216. I would also note by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    That on Intel architecture at least, divide by zero is a non-maskable interrupt. It has it's own interrupt pin and everything. This means if ou divide by zero an exception WILL happen and MUST be dealt with.

  217. Re:Not a real-time OS -- not so if done right. by tiger99 · · Score: 1
    That is not what control engineers understand by hard real time. Yes, your audio was no doubt arriving at the DAC with less than the necessary 200pS jitter (assuming 16 bits, it would be about 12ps at 20 bits, which is well-high impossible to achieve with standard technology), due to well-designed hardware timing, but your latency must have been large. BTW I have designed digital audio systems, albeit for communication management, not hi-fi, so I do understand the issues.

    In a control system you can't afford any appreciable latency, so you can't buffer data for more than one timer tick, and the necessary calculations really have to be done on a regular deterministic schedule. Often you need something like 20ms scheduling, with no appreciable sampling jitter, that is easily achieved by a RTOS, or some minimal custom software, but never by any conventional OS. You have to get all the inputs synchronously, and deliver outputs again synchronously to the timer interrupt, which you need to use to schedule the thing. You have to calculate all your lags and integrators and such like within the time frame every time.

    If you build a control system using hardware to do what should be done in proper software, you might as well have no software at all.

    I have designed control systems also, I did not write the code, but I specified in minute detail how the one hardware interrupt from a timer would control the scheduling, and I designed the I/O hardware to get the inputs into memory, and the outputs out, synchronously. It was actually easy, the Motorola TPU and QSPI peripherals on their microcontrollers are very useful indeed, when you are using serial ADC and DACs. It could not have been made to work on any existing OS, even with source code, except maybe a real time OS, but in fact the OS requirements of control systems are generally minimal. But, for stable control, we really had to achieve 10mS end to end, regularly, and we got that.

    I think that to get stable control of a ships rudder might not need 10ms scheduling, maybe 50ms would do, but you are limited by the need to close the loop round the hydraulic servo, there are lots of bandwidth and stability issues, and you still need a truly deterministic schedule. (M$ appears to have managed the amazing feat of putting non-deterministic code in their OS!) It gets worse if you use electric actuation, the characteristics of motors are such that to get good stiffness you need high loop gain, which places limits on the amount of time delay......

    Actually, a good example of what is needed in a control system would be to consider an audio system, with which you are clearly familiar, but for real-time use in live performances, where the equalisation is done by things like FIR filters in the software. Now slow it down by a factor of about 50. (of course no-one uses digital EQ in a live situation, because at the LF end you need so much time to do the EQ calculations, several samples at say 30Hz, that the delay makes it useless anyway, no-one is going to sit and listen to a 100ms or so echo.) Still it can't be done, unless you have a deterministic scheduler.

  218. More Information and Pictures by acehunter · · Score: 1

    Lots of cool pictures and info on the Visby at the following sites:

    http://www.kockums.se/News/photostock/photosurface .html
    http://www.kockums.se/surfacevessels/visby.html
    http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/visby/
    http://www.memagazine.org/backissues/jan01/feature s/stealth/stealth.html

    3D! Da corn is popping in your face inna... [throws popcorn in his own face] 3-D! -The Swedish Chef

    --
    -Mod how you like, we'll make more
  219. Command Session by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's just a glimpse of the command interaction with the ship's software...


    C:\WINNT\PROGRA~1\SSWRSHP> set SAIL=1
    C:\WINNT\PROGRA~1\SSWRSHP> set COURSE="bjürgìn fjòrds"
    C:\WINNT\PROGRA~1\SSWRSHP> SSWRSHPC /E:full /S:on
    segmentation fault

    C:\BED> exit
    _

  220. Disconnect motors and servos before update... by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    ...and stop the fscking middies from installing Gator on it all the time. If it opens the scuttling valves it'll be the Blue Sea of Death for all of us!

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  221. Why? by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    Why not just get a stanbdard opto mouse, take the teflon feet off to give it a bit more clearance, and mount it adjacent the rear of the wheel? No software... oops, hang on, this is NT, not X, time to write a special "this is not the mouse you are looking for" VXD.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing