Slashdot Mirror


Post-it Notes vs. Copy-Inhibited CDs

rjoseph writes "MacUser is running an article about how the new Celine Dion CD A New Day Has Come with copy protection mechanisms to prevent the CD from being played on a PC not only won't play on an iMac, but it will lock the CD tray (so it can't be removed) and fubar the firmware (so the machine can't be rebooted), effectivley killing the iMac. Ouch." We mentioned this interesting experiment in consumer relations last month as well, but now it's getting noticed a lot more. However, emkman writes: "What was first thought to be an April Fool's joke, now appears to be true. Some Audio CD protection schemes such as Cactus DATA Shield 100/200, KeyAudio, and perhaps others may be defeated by invalidating the outer ring of the CD with a black marker or post-it sticky note. www.chip.de has their report in German, here is a translation."

828 comments

  1. Class Action Lawsuit! by NETHED · · Score: 4, Funny

    GO buy one now!! I want a new computer at their expense!

    --
    --sig fault--
    1. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 2

      As I recall, the Celine Dion CD at hand does not contain the official "CD" logo on the case since it is not really a CD at all. It's a copy protected CD rip-off.

      Moreover, I also recall hearing that this "album" and albums like it come printed with a disclaimer that notes that the disk will not be playable in a Mac.

      and before you start thinking of going to court... you might want to jab a paper-clip in the to manual eject whole of the CD-ROM. Just about every optical drive has one. One is probably located behind the iMac's front drive "door." You'll have to open the door by hand, which is not hard to do.

      But hey, It sure would be nice is phillips would start taking these copy protection companies to court for infringing on the compact disk patents. as I said before, these disks are not CDs (as phillips has openly stated), but they are using a lot of similar technology.

      This crap could totally be stopped with legal action if people started organizing and getting creative.

      --
      "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    2. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by Cramer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There's a huge difference between "not playable in" and "will destroy if played in". If their technology is specifically designed to do this or they release it knowing it will have this effect, then they are in a heap of trouble. Such intentional action is under the jurisdiction of the FBI computer crimes division as felony computer tresspass (the same as any "hacker" breaking into systems.) Every single person with so much as one molecule of their finger in this pie deserves prison time.

    3. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by lunky · · Score: 1

      > Every single person with so much as one molecule of their finger in this pie deserves prison time.

      Prison time! Yeah and we should be able to flog their families too! Are you possibly overreacting?

      --
      lunky> c++; lunky> do{;}
    4. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by Tassach · · Score: 2

      I think not. The perpetrators of this scheme deserve a trip to the big house as much as, if not more so, the author of a destructive worm or virus. Intentionally damaging someone else's computer equipment is a federal felony. Read up on federal conspiracy laws.
      Corporate decision makers deserve to be held personally accountable for the criminal actions of their companies. Do you think the Enron fiasco would have happened if the bigwigs stood a snowball's chance in hell of actually going to the pokey? We cannot continue to allow corporations to be used as a shield which allows the senior executives to flagrantly break the law with total impunity.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    5. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by mark_lybarger · · Score: 2

      i really don't think the original post is overreacting in the slightest bit. this is intentional neglegance on the part of not the manufacturer, but of the copyright holder.

      any reasonable person would expect to be able to buy a cd, and plop it in their computer without any damages. weather or not any music comes off the disk is another story.

      is this any different than if disney's next dvd (monsters, inc?) were able to fry any dvd player that isn't using proper region encoding. it's intentional malicious behaviour twords a competing product (non-region encoded dvd's perhaps, those non-conformists bastards!)

    6. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by lunky · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You guys are both nuts^G^G^G^Goverreacting AND you don't know what you are talking about. This disc does not work in your Macintosh as it says on the label and it does not destroy anything.

      No one is intentionally damaging your computer BTW, it aint "malicious behavior towards a competing product" and here's the important part THERE IS NO CRIME!

      Oh and if you think your computer is destroyed, I will be willing to take it off your hands for you.

      --
      lunky> c++; lunky> do{;}
    7. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by Sancho · · Score: 2

      It depends.
      First off, there's a warning. I don't recall if they use the Compact Disc logo or not, either. If not, it's "at your own risk" if you put it in a compact disc player, computer or no. And with the warning, you should know better.
      Secondly, we're talking a copy-protection scheme here. Maybe I'm naive, but I figure the "locking up" is a side effect rather than the actual intent.

      But once again, if they don't call it a CD, and if it doesn't conform to the CD spec, it's not a CD. Buyer beware.

    8. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You guys are both nuts^G^G^G^Goverreacting AND you don't know what you are talking about. This disc does not work in your Macintosh as it says on the label and it does not destroy anything.

      And if I accidentally pop it into an MP3 player in the car and it "accidentally" fucks up the firmware in my ABS system? Sorry, saying "at your own risk" on something doesn't mean shit legally, especially if the risk is actually known. You can't put a sign on your front door saying "enter at your own risk" if you have a set gun behind the door which only goes off about one time in twelve.

      BOYCOTT THE BITCH!

    9. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by Cramer · · Score: 2

      Provide a picture of these warnings. I've never seen one. As for the CDDA logo... every one of my cd cases has a CDDA logo on the disk holding insert. Out of the half dozen music CD cases in front of me, none of them have a CDDA logo visable on the retail packaging. There's a logo on the actual disk in most cases -- however that cannot be seen without opening the product which requires purchasing it.

      And the warning (reportedly) does not indicate it will cause damage or void warranties. As I said, there's a huge difference between "won't work" and "will break". A DVD-ROM disk placed in a CD-ROM drive "won't work" -- it's simply will not recognize it. The drive isn't likely to throw sparks and set the neighbor's cat on fire.

      Now, the most likely scenerio is that the copy protection garbage is tripping the firmware's update proceedure. Pioneer makes a lot of stand alone hardware where this sort of firmware update proceedure is common place. Why the nuts would leave that part in the firmware of a consumer PC component is beyond me.

    10. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not that it matters, but where exactly on the label does it mention that it's known to cause damage to iMac computers?

    11. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prison time! Yeah and we should be able to flog their families too! Are you possibly overreacting?

      Goddamn right -- beat the shit out of many of them as an example to the rest. When do I get to overreact, when there's nothing left the bastards haven't destroyed. When you have to carry around a bucket of lit charcoal and tear out each page of a book as you read it and burn it to protect their almighty fucking IP. Piss on that. I'll overreact right now, thank you.

    12. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by lunky · · Score: 1

      >And if I accidentally pop it into an MP3 player in
      >the car and it "accidentally" fucks up the firmware
      >in my ABS system?
      You will probably be in a shitheap of trouble, and I think I'd be very mad at the people who produced the ABS system for the neglegence they showed in designing a saftey feature on my car.

      >Sorry, saying "at your own risk" on something
      >doesn't mean shit legally, especially if the risk
      >is actually known. You can't put a sign on your
      >front door saying "enter at your own risk" if you
      >have a set gun behind the door which only goes off
      >about one time in twelve
      No you can not kill people (good call) even with a warning. If I send you an ashtray in a jewel-cd case and you stick it in your computer thinking that it is a CD and it breaks your computer, I have not commited a crime and you are an idiot who broke his computer by sticking an ashtray in it.

      --
      lunky> c++; lunky> do{;}
    13. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 2

      paper-clip?

      "attempting to play the latest Celine Dion CD in a new iMac will result in the machine having to be sent for repair"

      "capable of damaging the PC's firmware. It seems that this is definitely the case, as once the CD is inserted into a new iMac it cannot be removed and the machine cannot be restarted"

    14. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by uspsguy · · Score: 1

      If it looks like a CD and it fits in a regular CD player, any reasonable person would assume it is a CD. If it then causes damage, it is a deliberate attempt by the producer/vendor/whatever to deceive the user. That is quite illegal. Reasonableness is a big issue in law and there are unreasonable.

      --
      Profanity - The sign of a small mind trying to express itself.
    15. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it's almost certainly the case that a disclaimer of the fact that the CD may damage the PC will not be sufficient in England. The Unfair Contract Terms Act contains several limitations on the effectiveness of such disclaimers, and the Unfair Contract Terms Regulations will strike down any 'unreasonable' term in a non-negotiable contract.

      Moreover the Sale of Goods Act says that goods must be "fit for the purpose for which...they are commonly sold", and I think it's common usage to use CD's in computers.

      I'm a law student in England and I'm thinking of having a pop at the record industry - the only problem is that if I went to the high court or above (with the intention of creating precedent) I'd be liable for costs if I lost, whereas in the small claims court I'd be safe but a victory would be rather meaningless.

    16. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by Gibbys+Box+of+Trix · · Score: 3, Informative

      According to this post, it appears that the new iMacs lack a manual release hole for the cd-rom drive and the disk has to be released by 'manually winding the cogs' or returning the machine for professional repair.

    17. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by einTier · · Score: 2

      Well, actually, if they know of this problem, and I'm sure by now they do, and they refuse to do anything about it, they can be held criminally negligent.

      Sure, it has a nice sticker on the front that says "does not play in Mac/PC", but it does not say "may cause damage to your Mac/PC". I also suspect these stickers and warnings on the CD are not overly large or noticeable.

      You can put whatever warnings you want on something, but when someone sees a five inch, flat round shiny disk, they are going to assume that it's a CD or DVD. It is not unreasonable they are going to try to play it. It is even more reasonable that they might try to play it in their computer after it plays fine in their car -- after all, in their experience, CDs that play in the car play in the computer. Also, even if it says "will not play", how many people will really believe that, considering they've never seen a CD that was readable by one CD-ROM and not another?

      An analogy would be if a food company put out a cereal that was poisonous to children but not adults, put it in a box with Micky Mouse on the front, and a very small warning label that said "not for consumption by children." Who do you think would be held liable in this instance?

      --
      -------------------------------------------------- $665.95 -- retail price of the beast.
    18. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by DrSkwid · · Score: 2

      IANAL

      but I expect these items to be displayed by the retail outlets in the "CD" section of their stores. Would this not push the responsibility from the packaging and on to the retail environment.

      Here's a exaggerated scenario :

      A plastic tub with a picture of an ice cream cone and some fruit on it placed in the freezer in the middle of the ice cream products. But it doesn't contain ice-cream, it contains an lovely tasting ice-cream like substance but it is mildly poisonous to people who own iMacs.

      The poison would maybe cost them $1000 in medical bills, lost work etc.

      Write in big letters on the lid "Eat at your own risk". Cripes you could even use that as your post modern advertising campaign.

      And when the come complaining say "buyer beware".

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    19. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by Sheridan · · Score: 2
      I did notice a friend's (yes - really!) copy of the Shakira album had warning notices both on the outside of the case and on the disk itself, stating that the CD would not play in a computer.

      I don't know which of the particular copy protection schemes are in use on that disk, or whether they are amongst the CDDA standards violating ones, but it did (almost) not display any CDDA logos:-

      It didn't, as far as I could see, have any Compact Disc Digital Audio logos on the outside of the case or on the disk itself.

      It did however have a CD Digital Audio logo moulded into the inside of the jewel case, towards the top right of where the disk clips in.

    20. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by shadowbearer · · Score: 0

      "Sorry, saying "at your own risk" on something doesn't mean shit legally, especially if the risk is actually known"

      Exactly - as the tobacco industry has been finding out for the last decade or so.

      Even worse about this instance is that they don't *even warn you* that it may lock the CD drawer on the Mac - which I believe puts them in violation of the product labeling laws in the US (IANAL)

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    21. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by BlowChunx · · Score: 1

      Actually, you don't necessarily have to send it in for repair, or "wind" the mechanism by hand. Apple has detailed info in a TIL article found here: http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=106 882
      Gotta love Open Firmware...

    22. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1

      Somebody mod the above post up, it contains valuable info about how to deal with the stuck disc. There is a manual eject on the new iMacs, as with all Macs.

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    23. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by monkeydo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not according to Apple, "Some computers, such as the iMac (Flat Panel), Power Mac G4 Cube, and certain models of Power Mac G4 (QuickSilver or later), may not have a user-accessible eject hole."

      They may have an eject hole, but it isn't accesible. There are however other ways of removing the disk.

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum
      The only thing more annoying than a Libertarian is an (un|mis)informed Libertarian
    24. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And... a 'Beware of Dog' sign on your fence will not absolve you of liability if some idiot climbs over and gets mauled by your Pitbull. Most of the time 'We're not liable if...' lables are legaly meaningless.

    25. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by Zone5 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd pay EXTRA for a DVD that set the neighbor's cat on fire - the damn thing keeps me up at night while it meows pitifully looking for love.

      --
      "So on one hand, honey is an amazingly sophisticated and efficient food source. On the other hand it's bee backwash."
    26. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by fobbman · · Score: 2

      It appears that you are trying to open the CD-door on your iMac...

    27. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're missing the point - the CD was released with a warning that it would not play in a Mac. Presumably they knew this because they were tested on Macs, which means they knew what the CDs would do to a Mac. I find it hard to believe a company would know enough to say "It won't work on a Mac", yet be totally unaware of the more serious consequences.

    28. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good thing it's there, but it's a pretty poor excuse if you need Internet access to find out how to get your computer to boot....

    29. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by stu-pendous · · Score: 1

      Better yet...
      1) buy a couple of these "CDs" from a major record store.
      2) open them and attempt to play in an unsupported CD player. (not one that will end up destroyed)
      3) take the disc back claiming that its defective.
      4) Demand your money back
      5) Repeat step 1)

      With enough iterations, it may force Sony to produce Compliant CDs. Specifically if the stores can't sell them.

      Either that or the stores will be forced to create a Non Redbook compliant CD section and remove the products from the Music CD section.

      BTW be prepared to fight for your money.

    30. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by layingMantis · · Score: 1

      Your .sig is stupid. Damn stupid. Seriously, I'm smart, and I bet I'm more articulate than 95% (at least) of the other smart ppl who read Slashdot. But I curse like a sailor at times, especially when angry. These are the facts, and they are undisputed.

      ~mantis

    31. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I typically roll my eyes when I see someone brag about being smart.

      Also, its "indisputable", not "undisputed". Obviously it was disputed, or you wouldn't have posted about it.

    32. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by doctordoggie · · Score: 1
      The first question that springs into my mind is - now they DO know about it, what are they going to do to sort it out? Is it right to keep something on sale which is now known to be harmful? I can feel a good day in court coming on...

      Come to Doggieville and fill your brains with truth!

      --
      Doggieville - the Comedy Hammer which hits the humour cow on its stupid head. Come to Doggieville and fill your brains
  2. But hey.. by distributed.karma · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    An iMac is not a PC!

    --

    --
    If you moderate this, then your children will be next.

    1. Re:But hey.. by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      You kids... Back in the old days, PC was generic for "Personal Computer". The Apple ][ was always called a PC, as were most CP/M machines. It took IBM's marketing machine to attach the term exclusively to their machines -- and later, those compatable with them.

      There's really no reason to reserve the term exclusively for one particular architecture.

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
    2. Re:But hey.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know why, but I was told that a company does not want its brand name used generically (Coke, Kleenex, etc.).

      If true, your "IBM marketing machine" theory goes out the window.

    3. Re:But hey.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PC isn't IBMs brand name.

      IBM is IBMs brand name. You could also throw in their other made up names, like Aptiva, AS/400, System/36, MCA, Selectric, etc, etc.

      PC is just a term they tried to pervert to their liking. Sorta like the milk council has perverted the generic term "Milk" to mean 2% cow's milk and nothing else, or the anti-drug Nazis have tried to tie Hemp to THC, or IBM tried to tie the idea of electric typewriter to IBM selectric. Mmmm, good fun.

      They don't own the term, but when enough money meets enough fickle minds, they can control it.

    4. Re:But hey.. by (outer-limits) · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      No, they were known as micro computers, hence 'Micro Soft'. IBM wanted to get a new name for its machines, and came up with PC.

      --

      Microsoft - Where would you like to go today, Maybe Jail?

    5. Re:But hey.. by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      "PC" is an alternate term for a general-purpose microcomputer. I know because I'm old and I was there. If you don't believe me, then believe someone else.

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
    6. Re:But hey.. by (outer-limits) · · Score: 1

      I was there before the PC, when they were called micro computers. The good old days of the Osborne sewing machine, kaypro and Big Board. The PC was a late comer, with the term being invented by IBM. Before then they were only known as micro computers. (A child of the 50's).

      --

      Microsoft - Where would you like to go today, Maybe Jail?

    7. Re:But hey.. by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 1
      That's not true. I worked in a computer shop at the time, and programmed on a number of CP/M machines, including the Osborne. (And also Altos and Superbrain, but not, as it happens, the Kaypro.) They were called microcomputers, but they were also called PCs. I became distinctly irritated when the press started calling the IBM machines (and their clones) PCs in contrast to machines like the Apple.

      I'm tired of this. I remember very clearly what we used to call the damned things. If you didn't, I really don't give a flying fuck at this point.

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
    8. Re:But hey.. by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      Back in the old days, any Apple user I knew would beat you up for calling their machine a "PC".

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  3. Oh no! by Villain · · Score: 2, Funny

    Damnit, I was really looking forward to that new Celine CD too. Guess I'll have to spend my money on Aphex Twin instead.

    1. Re:Oh no! by Invictus2.0 · · Score: 1

      According to the Campain for Digital Rights: "druqks" by Aphex Twin: Reported protected by key2audio in Germany by several people. Can't be played on a computer or laptop, nor copied to MiniDisc or a hi-fi CD recorder. UK release appears to be unprotected. Also reported unprotected in Belgium and the USA."

    2. Re:Oh no! by nexthec · · Score: 1

      hes the same(or close enough): http://uk.eurorights.org/issues/cd/bad/
      almost at the bottom

    3. Re:Oh no! by prizzznecious · · Score: 1

      My US copy plays just fine in my computer.

      --

      visit the hwky website for a lyrical genius infusion.
    4. Re:Oh no! by donovansmith · · Score: 1
      Try VNV Nation. You might like them.

      Well, if you can get their latest album, "Futureperfect", to play that is. It has no CD logo on the case or disc itself yet I have ripped it and played it in various machines (computers, portable CD players, and DVD players) without problems. But others may not be so lucky with it. Their first single from that album, "Genesis", is verified to be copy-protected and I have not bought it since I won't be able to copy it onto my computer to listen to it there as well as my MP3 player.

      And VNV Nation is a group I discovered through "illegal" Shoutcast radio streams and "illegal" MP3s a year and a half ago and now own three of their albums...

    5. Re:Oh no! by BlameFate · · Score: 1

      Not only did I rip both discs of "drukqs"; I then converted the mp3's into an mp3 CD so I could put both discs on 1 mp3 CD; I then imported them into My open MG jukebox and transferred them to my Net MD minidisc. I would therfore surmise that key2audio is talking bollocks.

      --

      --is not to be confused with user #672982 - Bame Flait

    6. Re:Oh no! by susano_otter · · Score: 2
      and now own three of their albums...

      Are you sure you own them? Maybe you just have a limited license to play them.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    7. Re:Oh no! by arashi+sohaku · · Score: 1

      Copy protected, eh? Considering that I have the import of Futureperfect and all the associated singles ripped into my jukebox for play on my shoutcast (URL ommitted as I don't have nearly enough bandwidth to support this forum).

      They all play just fine on MP3. Ripped with Musicmatch at 192kbps with no issues.

      They also kick ass in concert. :)

      --
      No .sig for me, I'm trying to quit.
    8. Re:Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Must be the Mac folks. I run WinXP on an Athlon and ripped the cd with no problems at all.

    9. Re:Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What extremes. Celine Dion and her rapist husband should take a long walk off a short pier ...

      Aphex Twin, on the other hand is a f*ckin genius.

  4. But who listens to Celine Dion anyway? by squidinkcalligraphy · · Score: 1, Funny

    Certainly not anyone I know who owns a mac

    --
    "I think it would be a good idea" Gandhi, on Western Civilisation
    1. Re:But who listens to Celine Dion anyway? by Brigadoon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Certainly not anyone I know who owns a mac

      I hate to stereotype, but at the risk of doing so, I'd wager that Mac users are more likely to listen to Celine Dion than otherwise.

      Pooling from all of the computer users I know - if that's any decent demographic - Linux users would most certainly not fall under the Celine Dion fans. Windows users, it seems, tend to be more alternative, pop, rap, ad nauseum. And finally, Mac users are more oldies, soft rock, etc. This of course is NOT any real indication of what people listen to; not science, just my own personal observations generalized.

      I've never seen a person sing "My Heart Will Go On" while recompiling their kernel.

      -X

    2. Re:But who listens to Celine Dion anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I hate to stereotype, but at the risk of doing so, I'd wager that Mac users are more likely to listen to Celine Dion than otherwise.

      This is the most obnoxious sentence I've seen in a while.

      You *hate* to stereotype? Really? I guess you don't hate it enough to NOT DO IT.

      Pooling from all of the computer users I know - if that's any decent demographic

      No, it is not a decent demographic.

      This of course is NOT any real indication of what people listen to; not science, just my own personal observations generalized.

      It is also TOTALLY useless and has no bearing on anything.

      Having a disclaimer like "I really hate it when people do this, but..." just makes you seem like even *more* of an ass than if you come out and say it.
    3. Re:But who listens to Celine Dion anyway? by rot26 · · Score: 1

      I hate to stereotype, but at the risk of doing so, I'd wager that Mac users are more likely to listen to Celine Dion than otherwise.

      I have to disagree. As a mac owner, my only characterizations of typical Mac owners would be that they are more likely to drive Volvos and more likely to think that their presidential candidate was robbed in the last election. (Neither of which apply to me, I have a Honda, invariably vote Republican or Libertarian)

      --



      To ensure perfect aim, shoot first and call whatever you hit the target
    4. Re:But who listens to Celine Dion anyway? by farfolen · · Score: 1

      if it means anything, im getting a mac and im republican driving a chevy lumina.

      --
      werd to yo motha, muh nizzle.
    5. Re:But who listens to Celine Dion anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Republicans on Slashdot? Jebus. What happened to the vast left-wing conspiracy we had going on?

    6. Re:But who listens to Celine Dion anyway? by MaxVlast · · Score: 1

      Curiously, I love both my Mac and my Volvo with its "Gore/Lieberman" bumper sticker.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    7. Re:But who listens to Celine Dion anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd wager that they are trying to stuff the statistics on the effectiveness of copy protection schemes.

      At some point the designers of this system will say: sales of Celine Dion were not effected by this copyprotection scheme, therefor it doesn't harm consumers, therefor you should go ahead and put this on all your CDs.

      The last thing the RIAA wants to see is a correlation between copy protection and a decrease in CD sales.

    8. Re:But who listens to Celine Dion anyway? by simetra · · Score: 1

      I am proud that I do not even know the name of any Celine Dion song.

      Thank you.

      --

      "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    9. Re:But who listens to Celine Dion anyway? by halfpastgone · · Score: 1

      i'm a mac user and happy to report that there is not a trace of celine to be found anywhere near me and I"m currently listening to Dead Kennedys' "MTV (get off the air)"

      --
      "I can't understand why people are frightened by new ideas. I'm frightened of old ones."
    10. Re:But who listens to Celine Dion anyway? by Ignominious+Cow+Herd · · Score: 0

      Yes you do. You just don't know it.

      --
      Lump lingered last in line for brains, and the ones she got were sorta rotten and insane.
    11. Re:But who listens to Celine Dion anyway? by dadragon · · Score: 1

      Weird. I drive a Ford truck with two bumper stickers:

      1) "Don't blame me, I didn't vote for him!"*
      2) "Yes this is my truck, No I won't help you move"**

      And a CD player that usually has hard rock or punk in it.

      *This technically true, I didn't vote for my Premier (NDP), but I did vote for my MLA (Liberal). I also didn't vote for the Prime Minister (Liberal), but I did vote for my MP (Alliance)
      **Actually, I've helped people move on many occasions.

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
    12. Re:But who listens to Celine Dion anyway? by simetra · · Score: 1

      Actually, no, I don't. And I've never seen Titanic, and never listen to radio, and don't have MTV or VH1. I am happy to report that my life has been totally Celine-Dion-Free.

      Thank You. Thank you very much.

      --

      "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    13. Re:But who listens to Celine Dion anyway? by uberdave · · Score: 1

      She popped a Celine Dion CD into her Mac, and now she can't post.

    14. Re:But who listens to Celine Dion anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup. All mac users are definitely gay AND defensive. So touchy.

    15. Re:But who listens to Celine Dion anyway? by toopc · · Score: 1
      I am proud that I do not even know the name of any Celine Dion song.

      1. I'm Alive
      2. Right In Front Of You
      3. Have You Ever Been In Love
      4. Rain, Tax (It's Inevitable)
      5. A New Day Has Come (Radio Remix)
      6. Ten Days
      7. Goodbye's (The Saddest Word)
      8. Prayer
      9. I Surrender
      10. At Last
      11. Sorry For Love
      12. Aun Existe Amor
      13. The Greatest Reward
      14. When The Wrong One Loves Your Right
      15. A New Day Has Come
      16. Nature Boy

      Celine Dion
      Album: A New Day Has Come

      You now know the name of a Celine Dion song. You can run from Celine, but you can't hide!

    16. Re:But who listens to Celine Dion anyway? by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      As a mac owner, my only characterizations of typical Mac owners would be that they are more likely to drive Volvos and more likely to think that their presidential candidate was robbed in the last election.

      I have a Quadra 610 that gets fired up occasionally (currently loaded with MacOS 7.5.3 and NetBSD), as well as a bunch of Apple IIs...that makes me more of an old-school Apple user than most Mac-heads. My automotive preferences lean more toward GM than Volvo (have an '02 S10 and a '77 Cutlass Supreme), and Satan will be engaged in snowball fights before I'd even consider voting for a Democrat. (I usually vote Republican, but I've occasionally thrown my vote to a third-party candidate if the putative GOP candidate was really just a RINO—a Republican In Name Only.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    17. Re:But who listens to Celine Dion anyway? by hey! · · Score: 2

      Then how do you know you don't like her, other than other people are telling you it is not cool to like her?

      Charlie Parker sometimes listened to country music on the jukebox and apparently enjoyed it even though today many of his jaz snob fans wouldn't be caught dead listening to it. Being caught is the operative phrase.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    18. Re:But who listens to Celine Dion anyway? by thoughtcrime · · Score: 1

      hummph. I'm a Mac dork that listens to early WaxTrax! industrial and still has a Nader sticker on her bike. Suppose I should break out the granola and just start crunching, I guess.

      --

      ____ _______
      Duty now for the future!
    19. Re:But who listens to Celine Dion anyway? by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      Right cause sexual preference has such a bering on which computer you choose.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    20. Re:But who listens to Celine Dion anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $ tail -19 .cdtooldb
      tracks 16 150 15965 34995 53610 69042 88525 104850 128805 153880 175512 194800 213562 230967 246715 263960 289655 4087
      cdname A New Day Has Come
      artist Celine Dion
      track I'm Alive
      track Right In Front Of You
      track Have You Ever Been In Love
      track Rain, Tax (It's Inevitable)
      track A New Day Has Come (Radio Remix)
      track Ten Days
      track Goodbye's (The Saddest Word)
      track Prayer
      track I Surrender
      track At Last
      track Sorry For Love
      track Aun Existe Amor
      track The Greatest Reward
      track When The Wrong One Loves You Right
      track A New Day Has Come
      track Nature Boy


      I don't think I've actually sung "My Heart Will Go On" while compiling my kernel, but then there's more to Celine than one overplayed megahit (in spite of what all the l33t "I don't even know the name of one Celene Dion song" d00dz might think).

  5. What garbage by smaug195 · · Score: 0, Troll

    It's goddamn ridiculous that this CD can break a computer, when you are performing a legal action with it. This is illegal, and I think Sony should be fined extremely heavily for it.

    1. Re:What garbage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget fined. How about drawn and quartered? Or keel-hauled? Or put in a room and made to listen to the Cilion Dion CD over and over untill there brain shuts down in self defense.

    2. Re:What garbage by smaug195 · · Score: 1

      Or put in a room and made to listen to the Cilion Dion CD over and over untill there brain shuts down in self defense.
      NO! How could one human being inflict such things on another?

    3. Re:What garbage by naasking · · Score: 1

      It's a rather illuminating indication of the sorry state of security in operating systems these days.

    4. Re:What garbage by Wumpus · · Score: 1

      According to the story, at least, it's not the OS that gets borked - it's the CD-ROM drive's firmware. The firmware is written to spec, and expects to handle CDs. Throw something that's not a CD at it - something that's designed to cause it to malfunction, as a matter of fact, and it's anybody's guess how it will behave.

    5. Re:What garbage by jx100 · · Score: 1

      Record Execs are human?

    6. Re:What garbage by ofan · · Score: 1

      We own an iMac, and even though the CD won't play on it, it certainly doesn't crash the machine or even stop it being ejected... We even have a Mac elsewhere that *will* play the CD. In my experience, you can't play it on win2k machines, but I have managed to duplicate it with my linux machine.

    7. Re:What garbage by corian · · Score: 1


      > Or put in a room and made to listen to the Cilion Dion CD over and over untill there brain shuts down in self defense.

      isn't this _exactly_ what the iMac does?

    8. Re:What garbage by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      Generaly speaking, if you toss a CD into your CD ROM drive and it isn't a mac readable CD. One of two things happens:

      a) The computer assumes there's no CD and merily goes on it's way, and will eject the tray next time you push the eject button.

      b) The computer locks up in a continuous cycle to try and read the CD. It knows something is there, and will continue to try and read it. The CD will not mount and no matter how often you push the button, the CD will not eject. The solution to this is to restart and remove the CD during the start-up process.

      If this thing is fsking with the firmware (of either the CD ROM or the Computer) we have a serious problem here. That's the equivilent of putting a tape in your VCR and having the VCR catch fire. That's not cool and if it can be proven to be intentional is also ilegal.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  6. Punishment by line-bundle · · Score: 2, Funny

    They are just punishing you for listening to Celine Dion. YOu deserve it.

    1. Re:Punishment by kisrael · · Score: 5, Funny

      They are just punishing you for listening to Celine Dion. YOu deserve it.

      No, this is your karmically-correct punishment for buying the Celine Dion CD...listening is its own punishment.

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
  7. Oh for goodness sakes! by JediTrainer · · Score: 0, Informative

    The firmware doesn't go foobar. The iMac isn't destroyed. Most CD drives have a mechanical (manual) eject that can be hit with a pen or paper clip. In that case you can just pull the CD out and you're fine.

    In other cases, perhaps you might need to get creative to get that CD out. Perhaps you need to pull the drive apart - who knows. The point is, the article made it clear that there is no permanent damage to the machine. Get the CD out, and everything goes back to normal.

    --

    You can accomplish anything you set your mind to. The impossible just takes a little longer.
    1. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 5, Informative
      Most CD drives have a mechanical (manual) eject that can be hit with a pen or paper clip. In that case you can just pull the CD out and you're fine.

      The new iMac doesn't have any manual way to do it.
      In other cases, perhaps you might need to get creative to get that CD out. Perhaps you need to pull the drive apart - who knows. The point is, the article made it clear that there is no permanent damage to the machine.

      Oh of course. All you have to do is dismantle the computer and void your warranty to get the CD out? Man, some people are just whiners!

      mark
      --

      If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
    2. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by Gaccm · · Score: 2

      while i don't know the details. The article said that the macs had to be sent in for repair which sounds to me to be worse than just a jammed CD.

      --

      Only dead fish swim with the stream...
    3. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by Hiro+Antagonist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're a tool; how'd you like it if the following took place whilst filling up your car:

      "Sure! C'mon, if you put our gas in your car, it's absolutely trivial to drain the fuel system and use non-protected gasoline; you'll just have to get that from...uh...er...somewhere else.

      But there's no permanent damage or anything..."

      --

      --
      I Hit the Karma Cap, and All I Got Was This Lousy .sig.
    4. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by phunhippy · · Score: 2

      Jesus people....yank the power, plug it back in, and use the dmn open-apple key sequence (can't remember it now...but if you own a Mac you should know) for ejecting the cdrom before it boots.

    5. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another reason the new iMac sucks. Good hardware limited by design for the lowest common denominator.

    6. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by znu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The CD format is a very well-defined standard, and Apple created a device that works perfectly with it. How is it Apple's fault if a malicious 3rd party intentionally creates a disc that violates the standard?

      --
      This space unintentionally left unblank.
    7. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Oh, I was making a general comment about Apple. Too cheap to include a $20 floppy drive, too stupid to include a manual eject for CDs....

      About the only thing they have done right is OSX, other than that they were living on application momentum alone.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    8. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't pay "alot" for your education, either, I take it.

    9. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That doesn't work, you just hear a whirring noise we had two customers come in with imacs at my best buy with this problem. You have to RMA it.

    10. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Too cheap to include a $20 floppy drive

      Why include one, since 90% of Mac users don't need it? Those who do need one can buy a USB one for about that price.
      About the only thing they have done right is OSX

      Is that all? Only a major operating system, completely different from the old one, based on UNIX?

      How disappointing!
    11. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by foobar104 · · Score: 5, Informative
      In other cases, perhaps you might need to get creative to get that CD out. Perhaps you need to pull the drive apart - who knows.

      Apple knows. You have three non-pull-apart options.
      • Hold the mouse button down while the Mac boots. This causes the firmware to eject the CDROM before it even starts booting the OS.
      • Load Open Firmware (cmd-opt-O-F) and type "eject cd."
      • Hold down the X key while booting the Mac. This forces Open Firmware to load OS X from the system disk, if there's a kernel present. Then use iTunes to eject the CD.
    12. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by flacco · · Score: 5, Funny
      In other cases, perhaps you might need to get creative to get that CD out. Perhaps you need to pull the drive apart - who knows.

      Or perhaps you need beat the living shit out of the fuck-heads who cavalierly take it upon themselves to fuck with your hardware. Then kill their extended families, burn down their houses with their corpses inside, and piss on the ashes.

      Or that paper clip thing might work too, I don't know.

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    13. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      \It's ironic how you make this post acting like people are simple too ignorant to know how to fix this problem, when in fact you are too ignorant to see that this doesn't work.

    14. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Oh of course. All you have to do is dismantle the computer and void your warranty to get the CD out? Man, some people are just whiners!"

      Or you can hold down the mouse button, which will eject all removable media on reboot (Same for all Macs). Some people are whiners..

    15. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by shobadobs · · Score: 1

      How so? The way I see it:

      1. CDs Invented
      2. Apple makes CD-ROM drives
      3. Some companies release things that aren't really CDs, have "copy-protection"
      4. Being non-CDs, they don't work in Apple's drives.
    16. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by isomeme · · Score: 2
      I'm sorry, but I blame Apple for this one. No data, however warped and horrid, should be able to do this to a drive. That it can do so means that Apple misdesigned the drive (and its device drivers).

      I'm reminded of the old C-64 1541 floppy drive, which could be wrecked by malicious boot-sector code that caused it to ram the head repeatedly against the stop until it misaligned itself. But I thought we were twenty years past such silly hardware and software design.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
    17. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by MikeKD · · Score: 1
      Could we do both?

      Of course I don't own a Mac, but I still wanna piss on their ashes (or at least piss in the eye sockets of their dead skulls).

      Yes, the RIAA ticks me off.

      Oh, and this is hyperbole. I do not condone anybody actually harming Ms. Rosen, et al,...of course *God*, technically, isn't a person...so I won't cry if an asteroid takes out DC & Hollywood (but ideally just the RIAA and Industry offices).

      -MKD

    18. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 2

      They are compact discs, but they aren't CDDA (Compact Disc Digital Audio). If you look you will notice most regular audio CD have that logo on there, but ones that violate the Redbook standard aren't allowed to have it.

      A music CD with no CDDA logo means:

      a)It has copy protection.

      b)They put too much music on the disc.

      c)It has hidden tracks.

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    19. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a special case and holding down the mouse DOESN'T ALWAYS WORK.

      Pay attention.

    20. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent comment.

    21. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're a yech at Best Buy, you probably need to RMA for just about anything.

    22. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by ivan256 · · Score: 2

      Too cheap? How about not dumb enough to waste $20 on a piece of hardware that was obsolete 10 years ago. If you want to take files with you to somewhere with no net connection, burn a CD. They're more durable, and it's faster then writing to a floppy anyway. Now if only PC vendors would stop including them so we could be rid of the things.

    23. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

      Too ignorant to see that it doesn't work? I'm doubting the poster actually tried the procedure.

      Get off your horse and realize that the truly sad thing here is that Apple hardware can be the severaly corrupted by program code. Shouldn't flashable proms (I'm assuming that's what is getting corrupted) only be programmable when in programming-enabled mode (I believe there's a button for that which is used during firmware updates)?

      Or am I just missing something here.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    24. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by nathanh · · Score: 2
      I'm sorry, but I blame Apple for this one. No data, however warped and horrid, should be able to do this to a drive. That it can do so means that Apple misdesigned the drive (and its device drivers).

      Except Apple didn't design the drive. They didn't build it either. And the problem is with the drive's firmware, so it's nothing to do with Apple's device drivers.

      If you had bought the same drive for a PC then it would do exactly the same thing.

    25. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by grung0r · · Score: 2, Informative

      I could be wrong, but I think that the imac cd drive violates the orange book standard. I'm pretty sure that all CD-rom drives must have a manual eject button.

    26. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I RMA that coyment?

    27. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by BtAFMB · · Score: 2, Funny
      Oh, I was making a general comment about Apple. Too cheap to include a $20 floppy drive, too stupid to include a manual eject for CDs...

      Don't even get me started on how they don't include a punch-card reader, and it doesn't have a single vacuum tube!

      --

      "I have fallen off the wagon, for I am a slave to tea."
    28. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by shepd · · Score: 2

      >I'm reminded of the old C-64 1541 floppy drive, which could be wrecked by malicious boot-sector code that caused it to ram the head repeatedly against the stop until it misaligned itself...

      Most of the misalignments were done by the copy protection code loaded onto the drive itself. The constant realignments to get the drive a 1/2 sector off (or so I recall reading as such) to get at the protected data were really nasty on the drive [feel free to correct me on that]. That's when you heard that clattering noise coming from your drive when playing the "original" disks (it was more than just "fastloader" code). This was just part of the reason people (at the time) legitimately autohacked their originals with hack-'em fast parameter files (among other utilities). Without using copy protected disks your drive would last longer.

      My personal favourite were the disks that slammed the head hard enough that you could feel it through the desk.

      Of course, this was all so easily possible because the 1541 disk drive had its own CPU (ever had your PC disk drive return an easter egg string before? ;-) which was reprogrammable by the computer. Of course, in this case you had to choose to run the program -- the 1541 didn't automatically boot your disks for you.

      As usual, history repeats itself. In another 5-10 years we'll probably be past all this copy protection (again) once the copy protection industries realise the truth (again): Copy protection increases copying.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    29. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by unitron · · Score: 2

      Yeah, it's a shame about that punch card reader, but the monitor CRT is one big old vacuum tube.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    30. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by esarjeant · · Score: 1

      Apple might not have designed this specific CD drive, but they decided it made sense to prevent the user from ejecting a disc while it might still be in use.

      This has been no end of trouble. There are Knowledge Base tips, FAQ's, and extensive Usenet support articles on the proper process of manually ejecting a CD from your Macintosh drive. Apple likes to coddle the user too much. My Centris 650 wouldn't even boot from a CDROM without an elaborate key sequence. As far as I'm concerned, Apple should mount an eject button on the CDROM drawer so the drive can be easily opened in the unlikely event the software eject is not working.

      The hardware eject can be disabled by the software when the disc is in use. If the user reboots, the software is no longer controlling it and you can get the friggin' disc out of the drive.

      --

      Eric Sarjeant
      eric[@]sarjeant.com

    31. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by WatertonMan · · Score: 1

      When you say, "no data should. . ." does that mean you think viruses shouldn't work? Don't get me wrong, I think most OSs are far to open to damage and while everyone focuses in on networks, the real danger are drivers. But still, blaming the OS for some company that probably spent millions of dollars to figure out how to screw with properly written device drivers so you couldn't play a CD on your computer. The parallels really are far closer to virus writers.

    32. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by (outer-limits) · · Score: 1

      Now I'm confused, the Apple ads all say that Apple buyers are individuals who think outside the square. But your telling me they are all just buying the LCD?

      --

      Microsoft - Where would you like to go today, Maybe Jail?

    33. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by BtAFMB · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, didn't think of that. Well, the tower and new iMac don't have CRTs, yeah, that's what I meant all along, really :)

      --

      "I have fallen off the wagon, for I am a slave to tea."
    34. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by nances · · Score: 1

      I hope you didn't pay "alot". Especially since "alot" is two words not one.

    35. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Laughed my ass off!

    36. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by KH · · Score: 1

      So, the Celine Dion (I can't even spell her name) disc is not technically a CD, and the iMac optical drive is not technically a CD-ROM drive. For, neither of them adhere to the standard.

      When one is inserted to the other, there is a problem...hmmm.

    37. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by markmoss · · Score: 2

      Apple didn't design the drive. They didn't build it either. But they selected it.

    38. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by shadowbearer · · Score: 0


      For users of the iMac and others which don't have an eject hole, the problem is more serious, even.

      1) One can take apart the machine and fix it yourself - but this will void your warranty. (I can just see explaining to the Apple Service Dealer why the case has been opened - "Oh, I bought this Celine Dion disk, see..."

      2) If you take it into the dealer, they are invariably going to charge you - I doubt this is covered under warranty! (Anyone?) So this CD ($25 or whatever) just ran up even *more* charges for you. IMHO I think that is excellent grounds for a lawsuit!

      I note that the first article said that the new SW:AOTC disk is protected this way. Funny - mine has neither a sticker nor copy protection - bought it, took it home, ripped it. Hmm. Out-of-US copies only?

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    39. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by shadowbearer · · Score: 0

      "Now if only PC vendors would stop including them so we could be rid of the things."

      Except that I really don't want to boot to a CD to format, fdisk, or check my HD for errors using HD manufacturers disk diagnostic software (nearly all of which comes in an executable file that *creates floppy disks*). Plus, have you ever tried to boot WinXP FS from floppy? It's 7 disks! (yes, there are times when you want to do so - running the OS repair tool from CD can hose up other things in your installation, as I found out when the new sbLIVE drivers hosed my XP install a few months ago...)

      I don't like floppies much either, but there are a lot of things they are necessary for if you do any tech work at all, which you obviously do not.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    40. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      I am not 100% certain, but I could swear that all macs including the iMac have a hole for the paperclip on them. Perhaps you aren't looking carefuly enough.

      In either case, to reboot a mac (or any computer) , even if the whole system is locked, you simply remove the power and plug it back in. Turn it on and poof! Problem solved. Getting the CD out is as simple as holding down the mouse button, or doing any of the steps listed by the poster above.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    41. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by sketerpot · · Score: 1

      Floppy disk drives are a way of moving files between computers that is typically reliable and system independant. The iMac doesn't have that ability, which can be annoying if you need it in a situation where you can't buy an external floppy drive. A manual eject for CDs is good for the times when something goes wrong with your computer and you want direct physical control over it. They are not relics of the past like punch cards.

    42. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by jswitte · · Score: 1

      Now if only PC vendors would stop including them so we could be rid of the things.
      Yeah, that would be nice. Except that I've got a Compaq 1270 (I know, a shitty laptop - in my defense I didn't buy it), and since Win98SE can't start up from the CD, I have to use a boot floppy to run it.

      [rant] Okay, time for a rant: this is rather odd: Compaq's own restore CD (which also installs tons of crap I don't want) works as a boot CD, and the default boot disk that Win98SE creates has a driver for the CD drive (I assume it's a semi-standard ATAPI one). So then why the hell can't MS just make the CD be bootable! (for those of use fortunate enough to have semi-standard ATAPI CD-ROM drives), other than that making it bootable would also make it easier to use when pirated.

      Now when I want to install from scratch, I have to hunt around for a floppy (I use Macs, so I have precious few of them around anymore), then run the Win98 setup program from within Win98 to create a boot disk, then restart with the boot disk and run the setup program off the CD. If I've hosed Windows so badly that I can't even do that, I either have to wait 3 hours for the compaq restore cd to reinstall all of it's crap, or use Virtual PC on the Mac to make the boot disk (I need that specific boot disk because it has the CD-ROM drivers on it..) [/rant]

    43. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by InfinityEdge · · Score: 1

      > Apple didn't design the drive. They didn't build it either. But they selected it.

      ... before this stupid copy restrict shit ever was invented. What do you want apple to do? "Uh sorry, we can't use your drive because it may fail when in the future jack booted RIAA thugs spend massive amounts of time and money to create a system designed to specifically break this drive."

      Give me a fucking break. Requiring that someone be able to see into the future before you'll buy their hardware is a bit extreame.

      "I won't buy an apple because they don't give me next week's winning lotto numbers with my order."

      Grow a brain, your brainstem needs company.

  8. Clarification by JediTrainer · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Sorry - money where my mouth is. I read a different article on this subject with more detail at New Scientist today which mentioned that. No permanent damage. There.

    --

    You can accomplish anything you set your mind to. The impossible just takes a little longer.
    1. Re:Clarification by caca_phony · · Score: 1

      from the article:
      As we reported last month, Celine's latest offering - A New Day Has Come - features copy-protection to prevent it being played and duplicated in a PC, and that same copy-protection was believed to be capable of damaging the PC's firmware.
      I value a positive claim over a negative claim in this case. If New Scientist had some proof from Apple (their source) that there was no damage to firmware, that would be another thing.

      --
      ...and this lie crawls out of its mouth: 'I, the state, am the people.'
  9. This explains how to get the drive to open... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:This explains how to get the drive to open... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      offtopic? idiot moderators.. click the fucking link with images off or use links or lynx to check a link before you mod offtopic.

    2. Re:This explains how to get the drive to open... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll see the moderator who modded this offtopic in metamoderation!!

    3. Re:This explains how to get the drive to open... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder what would happen if you sent your repair bill to sony. To me there's a difference between a "cd" that will not work in your computer and one that will physically damage the computer. Shame on you Sony. I will remember that when making future purchases.

    4. Re:This explains how to get the drive to open... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not how you say it - you say "Feel the sting of my METAMOD!!!!!!"

    5. Re:This explains how to get the drive to open... by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      offtopic? idiot moderators..

      He's just been dealt with in metamod.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  10. Bad programming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My God, firmware that can fubar like this? The programmer(s) should be shot.

    Of course, it was probably 10 people working on it, no one knew what the other guy was doing, and they were all people who never touched this stuff when they were kids, but after 4 years at University, they're 'experts'.

    Excellent.

    1. Re:Bad programming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bow to your l337n355!!
      No seriously.
      You probably couldn't write "hello world" in more than one language (counting english).

      Shut the fuck up and leave the programming to the programmers.
      nuff' said

    2. Re:Bad programming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, they're doing a GREAT job too.

      I'm proud that I only know one language. But I KNOW it, not lip service.

    3. Re:Bad programming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate 'experts'

  11. Taking it too far by Man+of+E · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seriously, breaking someone's machine intentionally is a bit excessive. Past copy-protection schemes were okay in my book because laymen couldn't get past them and people who bothered/could were in the minority: piracy prevention but without excess. But now the little laymen who don't bother reading the little warning labels are having their iMacs broken? This is affecting the luddites who don't know or care about p2p filesharing and buy all CDs and just assume they'll play in their CD players. Is the industry trying to alienate the people who still trusted it?

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une sig
    1. Re:Taking it too far by mofolotopo · · Score: 1

      Past copy-protection schemes were okay in my book because laymen couldn't get past them and people who bothered/could were in the minority: piracy prevention but without excess.

      Only it's not. Piracy prevention, that is. All it takes is one person on a file sharing network to get past the protection, and the cat's out of the bag; the other thousands of listeners don't have to know how to get past it to just get it off of Kazaa or whatever. It's the illusion of copy protection at best. In that light, your point is actually doubly made, though, as this hurts the laymen who wouldn't be doing any filesharing without stopping the sharing itself.

    2. Re:Taking it too far by Herr_Nightingale · · Score: 1

      The lesson learned, as ever, is simply this:

      do not buy music CD's, ever.

      The only way to kill this giant media hog is to starve it, and I'll bet the little artists won't even notice the difference. Heck, Dave Matthews and the Offspring seem to making quite a bit more since the p2p came into town ..

      The best reason for boycotting the 'legit' music stores is even better tho... remember when bands made fat stacks of cash for touring? You'd get more chances to see your favourite band if CD sales went down.

    3. Re:Taking it too far by raju1kabir · · Score: 2
      Only it's not. Piracy prevention, that is. All it takes is one person on a file sharing network to get past the protection, and the cat's out of the bag; the other thousands of listeners don't have to know how to get past it to just get it off of Kazaa or whatever.

      Yup.

      Moreover, it seems like this copy protection would result in lower sales than normal CDs.

      Ordinarily, after finding some music that I liked on a P2P service (which, in the absence of decent radio, is pretty much the only way to find out about interesting music these days), I'd just go buy the CD so I can listen to it in high quality and have the liner notes, etc.

      However, if I find out that the CD won't play in my preferred playback device (i.e., the computer - my stereo's CD player skips like crazy), then I'm much more likely to just download the whole thing and listen to it that way.

      I wonder if this means they'll start going after people who are posting lists of copy-protected CDs on the web.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    4. Re:Taking it too far by Craig+Maloney · · Score: 2

      Um... no. Touring costs big bucks. No money = no tour. No CD sales = no money.

    5. Re:Taking it too far by Weh · · Score: 1

      Touring doesn't "cost" money, it makes money. I assume you're thinking of the investment costs? Tours make a lot of money provided that enough people come.

    6. Re:Taking it too far by Craig+Maloney · · Score: 2

      Tell that to bands that have lost money on tour. It's very expensive to take any number of musicians out on the road. You have busses, roadies, equipment, lights, people to run the lights, etc. out there. (Trust me; they're not doing it just for the chicks.)

    7. Re:Taking it too far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Touring is advertising. It is done to sell more CDs. Why do you think most of the songs played are from the band's most recent release?

    8. Re:Taking it too far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      artists are sellouts anyways, get an ad sponser and wear their clothes or eat their chocolate on stage

    9. Re:Taking it too far by chryptic · · Score: 1

      Exactly right. Are these record execs realy this stupid. This piracy prevention does nothing to the guy that downloads the music it only screws over the poor guy that paid for the damn CD.

      Let's hope Darwin is right and the RIAA execs all die off soon.

      --
      The two most common things in the Universe are hydrogen and stupidity. -- Harlan Ellison
    10. Re:Taking it too far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that people who come to see a show usually already own the album.

    11. Re:Taking it too far by Weh · · Score: 1

      While I agree that it is very expensive to tour because of all the equipment/organization etc, I disagree that there aren't any bands making money on tours. An example of a band making lots of money on tours is the Rolling Stones. I do believe that there are bands out there that lose on touring but I think that most of the big name bands make money.

    12. Re:Taking it too far by Herr_Nightingale · · Score: 1

      I'm a musician and I've yet to make or sell a single CD - that doesn't stop me making money from gigs. And you're wrong about the chicks...

      in the old days, the studios would finance recording sessions and then artists would sell those albums, studios recoup the recording fees, and tours promoted sales; now, anybody can record and produce a decent album since the price of equipment (i'm not talking professional high-end shit here, but good stuff nonetheless) is low enough for the laity - but the problem is that everybody's got a CD now. Read the Led Zep biography, "Stairway to Heaven" for the real deal on touring.. I think you'll be surprised.

  12. Be careful by datastew · · Score: 1
    fubar the firmware (so the machine can't be rebooted), effectivley killing the iMac. . . . Some Audio CD protection schemes such as Cactus DATA Shield 100/200, KeyAudio, and perhaps others may be defeated by invalidating the outer ring of the CD with a black marker or post-it sticky note. www.chip.de has their report in German, here is a translation."

    When playing around with the opportunity to kill my firmware, I would wait for a real English article to tell me what to do, instead of relying on a translation. But maybe I'm just being paranoid.

    1. Re:Be careful by logical1010 · · Score: 5, Funny
      From the German translation:

      To hardly seize: With a simple felt marker you outwit Sony Music & CO and notice your right to a backup copy.

      Take that Sony Music & CO, I hardly seize you with my simple felt marker and notice my right to a backup copy! You have been outwitted!
      --
      There is something wonderful in seeing a wrong-headed majority assailed by truth. ~John Kenneth Galbraith
    2. Re:Be careful by npongratz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Take that Sony Music & CO... You have been outwitted!

      Make your time!

    3. Re:Be careful by Wire+Head · · Score: 2, Funny

      Congradulations! Thanks to the DMCA, we can now shut down all the felt tip marker makers, and 3M for making Post-it-Notes because they are devices capable of circumventing copy protection!

      --


      WireHead

      The previous message was created with 100% recycled words.
    4. Re:Be careful by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      Take that Sony Music & CO, I hardly seize you with my simple felt marker and notice my right to a backup copy! You have been outwitted!

      All your CD are belong to us...

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    5. Re:Be careful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does this make a permanent marker a circumvention device under the DMCA? Will we start seeing cease and decist notices sent out to newsagents everywhere?

    6. Re:Be careful by ipxodi · · Score: 1

      Based on this quote from the translation:
      "A sticking tire helps as ruler."

      I'd have to agree.

      --
      load "windows7" ,8,1
  13. Finally someone who realizes.... by Cynical_Dude · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... what the correct way to treat a Celine Dion CD is. Summary of article: a.) Buy black marker b.) paint underside of CD completely black Next up: The correct way to treat your boy group cds. a.) Buy some acetone b.) ...

    1. Re:Finally someone who realizes.... by 56ker · · Score: 2

      Then again there are the proud few of us who never bought a pop (or Celine Dion) CD in their life!

    2. Re:Finally someone who realizes.... by captaineo · · Score: 2

      My preferred method of CD enhancement is the application of a 5.56mm projectile at 3000fps.

    3. Re:Finally someone who realizes.... by America+Uber+Alles · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I prefer to get all mine on vinyl!

  14. DMCA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is a violation of the DMCA to post the "black-marker" work around? Will this /. story be obliterated from Google? Can you please post the inevitable cease-and-desist before RIAA shuts /. down?

    Celine has a right to make a living, ya know. Poor girl.

    1. Re:DMCA by wilko11 · · Score: 2, Redundant

      Does this also mean that black markers and Post-It Notes are anti-cirumvention devices that must be banned?

    2. Re:DMCA by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      well the article is in a german magazine and in germany you have a right to make a backup copy for yourself.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    3. Re:DMCA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not anti-circumvention devices. It's simply 'circumvention devices.' But yes, they must be banned now.

    4. Re:DMCA by danro · · Score: 1

      Yes!
      Think of the children!

      --

      "First lesson," Jon said. "Stick them with the pointy end."
  15. Capitolism in action. by TheQuantumShift · · Score: 1

    What do we do to get more people buying cd's? Lower the price to a reasonable $5-$7? No, wait, I've got it. We'll keep the prices around $18 Goddamn Dollars, and use a copy protection scheme that screws up iMacs... Nobody who listens to Celine Dion owns an iMac... Perfect! Let's all give ourselves raises. $100,000 a year enough? We'll have to cut jobs in the support and production departments...

    --

    Shift happens. Fire it up.
    1. Re:Capitolism in action. by TheQuantumShift · · Score: 1

      Dammit. I always spell capitalism wrong... Wonder what that "preview" button's for anyway...

      --

      Shift happens. Fire it up.
    2. Re:Capitolism in action. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $18? You lucky Yankee, you've got it CHEAP.

      Here in Canataxada, you will find CD's at THIRTY GODDAMNED DOLLARS. Walk into any HMV and you can expect to play INSANE amounts for a single fucking CD.

      Last xmas I went looking for a Nightmares on Wax CD and a Boards of Canada CD. Both CD's are a couple years old. Total cost? OVER SIXTY DAMNED DOLLARS. That was the last time I shopped at HMV.

      And they wonder why their CD sales are down?!?!

    3. Re:Capitolism in action. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whoh whoh whoh, let's not put all capitalism in the same basket. I would rather live in a capitalist society then a communist one. I think sony's work here is a bad example of capitalism and they should be ashamed of themselves.

    4. Re:Capitolism in action. by c.derby · · Score: 1

      Thats $30 Canadian. Which comes out to about $4US... har har... Seriously, $30CAD is like $19.28US. Hmmm.. Nightmares on Wax. Haven't listened to that in ages..

      --
      -- derby
  16. For everyone saying "I don't like Celine Dion" by Gaccm · · Score: 5, Informative

    The soundtrack of Episode 2 seems to be protected in such a way also.

    --

    Only dead fish swim with the stream...
    1. Re:For everyone saying "I don't like Celine Dion" by Galvatron · · Score: 2

      Wow, that's got to be one of the stupidest things I've ever heard. The overlap between Star Wars fans and people who listen to music on their computers has got to be enormous. I actually would have bought this, but now I guess I'll just wait for someone to post an analog rip to KaZaa(-lite), since I haven't owned a stereo for 3 years now.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    2. Re:For everyone saying "I don't like Celine Dion" by SealBeater · · Score: 5, Funny

      Doesn't matter, it's already been ripped and posted on
      alt.binaries.mp3.soundtracks. 8*)

      SealBeater

      --
      -- Its survival of the fittest...and we got the fucking guns!!!
    3. Re:For everyone saying "I don't like Celine Dion" by Robotech_Master · · Score: 2

      Note that this is an article from a British website...and copy-protected CDs are a lot bigger in Europe than they are on this side of the Atlantic. Do we know for certain whether the American editions of these CDs are thusly protected?

      I do know that the Star Wars Episode 2 soundtrack is already circulating on AudioGalaxy...

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    4. Re:For everyone saying "I don't like Celine Dion" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like your sig. damn good movie it was.
      Follows rant about how pi is the greatest number in the world, crapflooder style....
      ...and so on for 6000 chars ;-)

    5. Re:For everyone saying "I don't like Celine Dion" by dpbsmith · · Score: 5, Funny

      First they came for "More Fast and Furious," and I did not speak out because that's not my kind of music.

      Then they came for Celine Dion, and I did not speak out because I'm lukewarm about Celine Dion.

      Then they came for Episode 2, and I did not speak out because I'm not really a Star Wars fan.

      But THEN they copy-protected that CD of "Richard Stallman sings Tom Lehrer..."

    6. Re:For everyone saying "I don't like Celine Dion" by letxa2000 · · Score: 2
      Episode 2 ripped fine enough for my friend to pass me a couple of tracks. Cool, it sounds better than the Episode I soundtrack...

    7. Re:For everyone saying "I don't like Celine Dion" by jokell82 · · Score: 1

      I was able to rip it to iTunes on my iBook, no problems whatsoever. You are referring to the European version. Seems to be lots more copy protection going on over there first...

      --
      I dunno who it is
      but it prolly is fhqwhgads.
    8. Re:For everyone saying "I don't like Celine Dion" by Saeger · · Score: 1
      Well, your post prompted me to search the donkey, and I can see that 94 people are sharing the soundtrack... but since I don't even feel like previewing it, I'm not going to bother dl'ing it. :)

      John Williams - Star Wars Episode II Soundtrack - 192kbps.rar

      Bummer, ed2k links seem to get munged by /. you'll have to do your own query.
      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    9. Re:For everyone saying "I don't like Celine Dion" by smaug195 · · Score: 1

      But THEN they copy-protected that CD of "Richard Stallman sings Tom Lehrer..."

      And I Thanked sony personally :P

    10. Re:For everyone saying "I don't like Celine Dion" by TheConfusedOne · · Score: 1
      But THEN they copy-protected that CD of "Richard Stallman sings Tom Lehrer..."

      So.....

      if....

      Sunday

      you're free why don't you come with me while we...

      Poison the Penguins in the park.

      I'm not quite sure who I should apologize to for that one.

      --
      --- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
    11. Re:For everyone saying "I don't like Celine Dion" by superpeach · · Score: 1

      Well, this copy protection thing seems to be doing a good job so far then...
      I would have thought this got more people downloading mp3s and never buying the CD from fear that their CD drive would be broken, or their audio CD player may have problems with it. Personally, the only things I have which are capable of playing CDs are my PC and this portable thingy that also plays mp3s and VCDs, so I guess thats likely to not be able to play them either.
      How does probably halving the number of devices which can play CDs help sell more CDs?

    12. Re:For everyone saying "I don't like Celine Dion" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brilliant!!!

      That image is sooo good.

    13. Re:For everyone saying "I don't like Celine Dion" by SWTP · · Score: 1

      Are you sure on the ATOC CD? Not the one I found.

    14. Re:For everyone saying "I don't like Celine Dion" by jonbrewer · · Score: 2

      I believe the correct group is:

      alt.binaries.sounds.mp3.soundtracks

      at least on servers I checked.

    15. Re:For everyone saying "I don't like Celine Dion" by forged · · Score: 2
      Wonderful proof that these measures really only annoy Joe Consumer.

      Go mp3's ! (these won't kill your iMac)

    16. Re:For everyone saying "I don't like Celine Dion" by shadowbearer · · Score: 0



      Mine doesn't seem to be, no sticker, rips fine. Got it at WallyWorld.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    17. Re:For everyone saying "I don't like Celine Dion" by CarlFairhurst · · Score: 1

      My wife bought this for me, and yes it does say it doesn't play on a PC or MAC. However, she did buy this in Tesco (grocery store) and it was placed in the middle of a bunch of CD's.
      What I was thinking of doing was complaining to the trading standards people. If you sell something which looks like a CD, tucked in amongst CD's with a tiny little warning on the front which someone isn't going to notice unless they actually look for this, this is deceptive marketing. I don't know if they'd be able to do anything, but if enough people did this, it might start making it into the mainstream media.

    18. Re:For everyone saying "I don't like Celine Dion" by cacav · · Score: 1

      Actually, my coy of the soundtrack played fine in my IBM laptop at work running Win2K. I was using Winamp to play it and I couldn't see any problems. I saw the Episode II soundtrack mentioned in the article, and I was kind of confused by it. Did they only protect a small sample of the CDs, or what?

      I got mine at a local Best Buy with a "special" collector's card inside, so I'm wondering if they got a different batch than some of the other record stores. Anybody else have one that worked from a regular store?

  17. Celine Dion does not meet Starcraft by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 5, Funny

    I tried to test this Celine Dion CD to see if it would get stuck in my iMac, but then I discovered to my horror that I couldn't get the Starcraft CD out of the drive. Must ... Quit ... Game ... and press ... Eject ... Muscles ... not ... responding...

    graspee

    P.S. This may have legal implications if my Starcraft CD starts downloading mp3s without my permission. (ha ha. sorry).

    1. Re:Celine Dion does not meet Starcraft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where the hell did you come from 1997, who the hell plays starcraft anymore with morrowind? Thats the whole reason I bought a 64 meg pci Video Card, so I can play it at work when there is nothing to do.

    2. Re:Celine Dion does not meet Starcraft by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 2

      Starcraft, like Sailor Moon, is eternal. I'd organize a gang of Starcraft fans to come round and talk some sense into you but we're really rather busy having a tournament at the moment.

      graspee

    3. Re:Celine Dion does not meet Starcraft by BigAl_nz · · Score: 1

      I'd rather listen to Radio Free Zerg, and The 12 Days of Starcraft than Celine Dion anyday :)

      --
      --- There isn't any problem that can't be solved by a small, low yield nuclear device, is there??
  18. An analogy by TrumpetPower! · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If someody were to develop some amazing new casette tape that didn't work on a subset of casette players, that would be okay. If that tape, instead, destroyed the player into which it was inserted by chewing up the playback heads, that would not be okay, even if it came with a label saying, ``Not for use on foo tape decks.''

    Celine has done the latter.

    b&

    --
    All but God can prove this sentence true.
    1. Re:An analogy by Man+of+E · · Score: 1
      I have a Mont Blanc fountain pen that takes little ink cartridges. You put two cartridges in the barrel at the time - one open and attached to the nib, and the other in the back as reserve. The little booklet that comes with the pen says it will only work with Mont Blanc cartridges.
      Once, I had no Mont Blanc cartridges left, so I put cartridges from another company in - S.T. Dupont. It was a tight fit, but the pen seemed to work. However, when the first cartridge ran out, I tried to get the reserve one out of the barrel and found that it was completely stuck. Smacking the pen against the desk didn't help at all. In the end, I had to resort to some complicated antics with bent bits of wire to fish the stuck cartridge out of the pen, covering myself in blue ink in the process. The pen wasn't broken for good, but if it had been, I still wouldn't have felt like suing Mont Blanc over it...

      Not that I disagree with your point, I just wanted to tell the story :-)

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une sig
    2. Re:An analogy by penguinboy · · Score: 2

      How can it be the pen manufacturer's fault if some other company makes ink cartridges that aren't the right size?

    3. Re:An analogy by Man+of+E · · Score: 1
      Perhaps I should have said I didn't want to sue S.T. Dupont, the cartridge manufacturer -- that would be more appropriate. Thanks for pointing that out.

      In the actual case, it is the CD company's fault that the iMac gets fubared, no?

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une sig
    4. Re:An analogy by stux · · Score: 1

      Whooo, spoooky :)

      I swear I've had that exact same experience...

      Exact...

      Ooooh, are you me?

      Right down to the wire shenanigans :)

      That blue ink took ages to get off my fingers ;)

      Anywho, I don't use Fountain pens anymore...

      Actually... don't use pens anymore :)

      --

      ---
      Live Long & Prosper \\//_
      CYA STUX =`B^) 'da Captain,
      Jedi & Last *-fytr
    5. Re:An analogy by Weh · · Score: 1

      not a good analogy... With music cd's it's commonly accepted that a cd is a cd and will play on any cd player (also the ones on your pc) no matter who makes the cd or the player. With your pen it's a totally different story because everyone knows that different fountain pens take different cartridges. And everyone understands that VHS tapes won't play in Betamax etc. etc. CD's are or were more standardized, changing that causes confusion amongst consumers. It's like if you buy some floppy disks and you don't bother to read the package because you know they're all the same anyway but then they suddenly mess up your pc.

  19. Legality? by beefstu01 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ummm... isn't this illegal? If some iMac owner accidently puts one of these CD's in the drive and send the thing to kingdom come, didn't Sony just damage their computer with malicious intent? C'mon, Sony has to know that the CD's are going to do this. Can we say class action lawsuit? What's wrong with playing a cd in your computer? Sure, I've got MP3's, but I also play audio cd's on my laptop, and if my laptop gets busted becase one of these damn cds, then I'd frickin sue Sony and anybody connected to the deal for every dime they've got.

    Sony should realize that they're treading on very thin ice here. They need to realize that some people have very sensitive information on their computers, and if it gets f*$&# because of their cd protection scheme.....

    Sorry, but these dumb moves just irritate me

    1. Re:Legality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      need to realize that some people have very sensitive information on their computers

      Of course you'd have that backed up anyway, so it's not life or death should something happen.

      They still shouldn't be screwing around with the CDDA format though. There is a standard for a reason! Maybe we should modify the TCP/IP stack so that all data coming from RIAA members gets corrupted? :)

    2. Re:Legality? by apg · · Score: 2, Funny

      If some iMac owner accidently puts one of these CD's in the drive and send the thing to kingdom come, didn't Sony just damage their computer with malicious intent?

      Not that I agree in any way shape or form, but Sony's defense will likely be something along the lines of:

      "A sanding pad from a rotary sander will damage your CD-ROM drive, but they don't even put labels on those. At least we told you not to put our disk in your computer. It's not our fault if you didn't disassemble the jewel case to read the fine print we printed under the CD tray in reverse pig latin."
    3. Re:Legality? by dustpuppy · · Score: 2

      I get the point you are making, but think there is a fundamental difference. The sanding pad will damage your CDROM, but it never intentionally was designed to do that. And the destructive nature of the sanding pad on the CDROM is a core part of it's functionality.

      These new CDs however are intentionally being created to destroy property and this destructive feature is not part of their core functionality. I'm not a lawyer, but I would hope that this distinction is enough for lawsuits to proceed ...

    4. Re:Legality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't it be a riot if someone called Sony for tech support on their Vaio because this (Sony-made) CD pooched their drive?

    5. Re:Legality? by mpe · · Score: 2

      If some iMac owner accidently puts one of these CD's in the drive and send the thing to kingdom come, didn't Sony just damage their computer with malicious intent? C'mon, Sony has to know that the CD's are going to do this. Can we say class action lawsuit?

      I though such lawsuits were only applicable to civil matters. Whereas interfering with operation of computers is in many places a criminal matter. This isn't veru different from a virus which spreads through MS Outlook (Express). Even though the user may have done something silly that does not exclude the author of the malware.

    6. Re:Legality? by Alsee · · Score: 2

      didn't Sony just damage their computer with malicious intent?

      No, there was no malicious intent. They were designed to protect copyright.

      The fact that they *do* cause damage is gross negligence. It's easier to sue people to hell and back when you get your terms right :)

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    7. Re:Legality? by gosand · · Score: 2
      Sure, I've got MP3's

      Then you are a pirate, a thief. You have no credibility, you are taking money out of the artist's pockets, and are silently killing their puppies. You are stealing from us. YOU are the reason our sales are down, and {ringgg} .... hold on a minute (yeah. Mmm hmm. Another boy band? Fantastic! Sign them up, give them the standard contract, tell them they have talent - you know the routine.) Now where was I? Oh yeah - you should die, you virilent scum. Our lawyers will be contacting you.

      Sincerely, the RIAA.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    8. Re:Legality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot "MP3's make baby Jesus cry"

    9. Re:Legality? by alcmena · · Score: 2

      Wouldn't it be a riot if someone called Sony for tech support on their Vaio because this (Sony-made) CD pooched their drive?

      It'd be even more perfect if the Sony CD also caused the sound card on the Sony Vaio to output square waves that destroyed the Sony speakers on the attached Sony stereo. I'd love to hear them try to pass the buck on that one. "Uhhh, Windows did it."

    10. Re:Legality? by Cally · · Score: 2
      Oh purLEASE.... Why is it that EVERY frickin time a story like this is published, some gimp always claims "Why, if they did that to ME, I'd SUE! Can you say CLASS ACTION?"

      Stop and think. You WON'T sue them. No-one EVER sues in these situations: if they did, we'd have a Slashdot front page full of stories about hardware megacorps being banktupted by massive lawsuits. Go ahead an md me down if you want, (I'm capped anyway) but it still ain't going to happen.

      --
      "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
    11. Re:Legality? by Gleef · · Score: 2

      Alsee writes:

      > didn't Sony just damage their computer with malicious intent?
      No, there was no malicious intent. They were designed to protect copyright.
      The fact that they *do* cause damage is gross negligence. It's easier to sue people to hell and back when you get your terms right :)


      These discs were designed to interfere with people's ability to copy the disk (if they were designed to protect copyright they would permit fair use copying). I read this incident as along the lines of "when I shot him, I only intended to wound, I didn't mean to kill him". There was definately deliberate intent to disrupt the operation of the device, but they probably did not intend to lock up the CD-ROM drive completely.

      I'm not 100% sure what the correct term is, but I am sure this goes beyond gross negligence. Disclaimer, I am not a lawyer, this should not be construed as legal advice.

      --

      ----
      Open mind, insert foot.
    12. Re:Legality? by beefstu01 · · Score: 1

      Heh, well the thing is that I've been to court already, going back, and I'm not affraid to go for a third round (both times were car accidents where I was screwed out of compensation). My point is that if they pulled that stunt on me, I'd like them to know that there's at least one person out here that isn't affraid of going to court.

      The RIAA sucks too... (loved the comment above, should get +5 Frickin Hilarious). What I don't see is why the RIAA gets pissy about MP3s in general. I own the albums those MP3s were ripped off of, so I already have the right to play them for myself. *sigh* They deserve to rot in hell.

      Yeah, and it'd be a hoot if somebody got their VAIO ruined because of those CDs... maby I should buy that CD and have fun with the Best Buy display VAIOs. (Insert evil grin and laughter here)

    13. Re:Legality? by Alsee · · Score: 2

      if they were designed to protect copyright they would permit fair use copying

      It's impossile for technology to distinguish fair use from illegal use. They just lump it together.

      The two problems with DRM: (1) it eliminates fair use and (2) the dumb-ass laws to protect the DRM protecting the content. Next they'll be passing even dumber-ass laws to protect the dumb-ass laws. Then maybe a constituional amendment to protect the dumber-ass laws. Ahhh, and I know - a genetic-revision to protect the constitional amendment LOL

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    14. Re:Legality? by Gleef · · Score: 2

      Alsee writes:

      It's impossile for technology to distinguish fair use from illegal use. They just lump it together.

      Exactly, my point is that it can't legitimately call it "protecting copyright" if it doesn't permit copying that is permissible under copyright law. If they can't separate legal from illegal copying (which nobody can see how to do accurately), they would need to allow all copying. This would, of course, defeat the whole purpose from their point of view.

      Therefore, rhetoric aside, their point of view has nothing to do with protecting copyrights. It is merely about preventing copying.

      --

      ----
      Open mind, insert foot.
  20. circumvention devices? by schussat · · Score: 5, Funny
    Are we to understand that post-it notes and sharpie pens are now contraband circumvention devices? 3M is not going to like this, not one bit.

    -schussat

    --
    The hour of noon has passed. Let us go and get some Kentucky Fried Chicken.
    1. Re:circumvention devices? by qslack · · Score: 5, Funny
      Are we to understand that post-it notes and sharpie pens are now contraband circumvention devices? 3M is not going to like this, not one bit.


      Actually, 3M is embracing this new product direction.

      They have renamed their Post-It product line to Toast-It, making a clear reference to burning, or "toasting," a CD-R.

      They have also renamed their popular Sharpie line of permanent markers to "Share-pie," indicating that the markers will enable purchasers to share music.

      :)
    2. Re:circumvention devices? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      in united states, maybe. in germany you have got a right to make a backup copy, so the article is legal here and post-it notes too.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    3. Re:circumvention devices? by Bouncings · · Score: 4, Funny

      in germany you have got a right to make a backup copy

      Damn you and your superior legal system snobbery.

      --
      -- Ken Kinder ken@_nospam_kenkinder.com http://kenkinder.com/
    4. Re:circumvention devices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We'll get the same kind of protection-circumvention-prohibited bullshit soon enough, might just as well enjoy our freedom while it lasts.

    5. Re:circumvention devices? by CaptainSuperBoy · · Score: 1, Troll

      HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA NICE TRY, but even a FOOL such as yourself should know that 3M doesn't make sharpies. THEY ARE MADE BY SANFORD. I HAVE NOW INVALIDATED YOUR ENTIRE ARGUMENT, HAHA AHAHAHAHAHA

    6. Re:circumvention devices? by qslack · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dear CaptainSuperBoy,

      I am sorry for the problem(s) that I have written into my messages. Down here in Afghanistan, we can't get Sharpies or Sanford markers, so I have no way of knowing the correct brand that I should have put in my messages.

      Please excuse this!

      I now must go and watch my DiVXes on my C-64 and play Final Fantasy X! Also, I have a question about Linux on quad-processor machines. I hope you can help me!

      Thank you!
      Junis from Afghanistan

    7. Re:circumvention devices? by gotan · · Score: 2

      They're working at legislation to make circumvention of copy-protection illegal here too. Last i heared it's even worse than the DMCA. The problem is, that those laws are made by the EU, not really following democratic processes (since nobody is looking, and everybody is only concerned about what's going on in their own country), and then the EU-countries have to follow that guidelines. Germany didn't even opt to go for the most consumer-friendly way possible. Hopefully we're spared this being pushed through in a few months (that was the original plan, since we are running late in following that specific EU-guideline) but it will come. Meanwhile the media is completely ignoring the story, apparently it's to complex a subject ...

      No it's not better here in germany, only later.

      --
      "By the way if anyone here is in advertising or marketing... kill yourself." -- Bill Hicks
    8. Re:circumvention devices? by enigma48 · · Score: 1

      For the record, I believe the same "spirit" is present in the Canadian/US laws.

      Nowhere in the law though, does it say the companies must make it easy for you to make the copy.

      (This isn't my idea, this was stolen from a slashdot post I read long, long ago)

    9. Re:circumvention devices? by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1

      I just wanna know HOW THE HECK YOU GOT SO MANY ALL-CAPITAL LETTERS through the LAME-LAMENESS FILTER, ALRIGHT?

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    10. Re:circumvention devices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haven't you heard.. the felt pan and post-it notes are now going to be banned because they violate the DMCA

    11. Re:circumvention devices? by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In the USA we have a legal right to make a backup copy. We just don't have a legal *way* to do it.

    12. Re:circumvention devices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you know, at first I thought this said circumsision... I mean ouch! could you imagine trying to do that with a post-it note? talk about a paper cut....
      or a felt tip pen? not quite sure how that would work

    13. Re:circumvention devices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No they are made by Rubbermaid (or Stanford is owned by Rubbermaid).

    14. Re:circumvention devices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am sorry for the problem(s) that I have written into my messages. Down here in Afghanistan, we can't get Sharpies or Sanford markers, so I have no way of knowing the correct brand that I should have put in my messages.

      OH MY FSCKING GOD YOU POOR THIRD WORLD BLIGHTER HOW DO YOU GET THROUGH LIFE WITHOUT A SHARPIE? MY SHARPIE IS THE GREATEST SINGLE THING I EVER OWNED. I WOULDN'T TRADE IT FOR ALL THE GOATS IN KHAZAKSTAN. WITH MY SHARPIE I RULE THE WORLD...

      (now let's avoid the stupid lameness filter - yes i know i'm shouting i like to shout)

      Please excuse this!

      I now must go and watch my DiVXes on my C-64 and play Final Fantasy X! Also, I have a question about Linux on quad-processor machines. I hope you can help me!

      Thank you!
      Junis from Afghanistan

    15. Re:circumvention devices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's got a point there, you know. Under the DMCA, black markers and post-it notes are now contraband.

    16. Re:circumvention devices? by tempfile · · Score: 1

      Now get this: In Germany, "fair use" even includes the right to make a personal copy from rented media, to make as many personal copies (in any form you desire) and you may even make copies for a well-defined small group of people.
      As another poster stated, this is bound to go away soon, however, because the EU is the US's bitch. :(

    17. Re:circumvention devices? by tweakt · · Score: 2
      Yes and by posting this information, it's in direct violation of the DMCA by spreading information on how to circumvent a copy protection mechansism.

      You may not tell someone that by putting a post-it(tm) note on their CD, they can circumvent this protection, it's illegal.

      OOps, I just did too... d'oh.

      Is slashdot liable also for spreading this information?

      When will the madness end?

    18. Re:circumvention devices? by Papineau · · Score: 2

      Don't forget it's the same country where a law firm can send a trademark infringement letter to somebody on behalf of somebody else (without their nowing), and get paid for it in the process (see Samba, etc.)

      So even if your post was meant to be funny, don't forget that there can be some things you like and some others you dislike in everything.

  21. Unbelievable by teslatug · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No not the fact that the CD can break firmware, but the fact that the firmware can be broken by a CD.

    1. Re:Unbelievable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know what you mean. How can anyone design hardware that gives so much control to the firmware/software that it actually allows damage? Imagine the field day that virus writers could have.

      On the same note. Maxtor is guilty of something similar. They had a hard drive that you could Ghost to death. If you made an image on a 2.1GB Maxtor drive that had 16-heads and then tried to load it on a Maxtor drive of the same 2.1 line with 15-heads the drive would actually die. Dead as in no boot nothing. Compaq got burned big time when one of their customers had 1/3 of their recently rolled out machines die within a week of delivery.

    2. Re:Unbelievable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yo, open sores idiot, read the other comments, the firmware doesn't break. Its just Linux Fud, which makes MS look honest.

    3. Re:Unbelievable by tpv · · Score: 1
      Technically, they're not CDs, because they don't follow the CD specs.

      However, your point does stand. Nothing I put in the CD drive should break the firmware.
      Except maybe yogurt.

      --
      Read more of this story at Slashdot.Read more of this story at Slashdot.Read more of this story at Slashdot.
    4. Re:Unbelievable by jhoger · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... I think it's probably a testing issue. It would be kinda difficult to try all combinations of CD's which aren't REALLY CD's.

      Firmware is designed to respond to normal data -- that likely even includes random or corrupted data. But a disk designed to f**k with the firmware's mind, with the express purpose of confusing it, well, all bets are off. I doubt it ever even crossed the engineers mind to handle an evil CD-ish thing, nor should it have. He/she was designing to handle a given specification, and these disks break it.

    5. Re:Unbelievable by mark_lybarger · · Score: 2

      i agree that no cd should break the firmware, but these aren't cds. the firmware writers have to code to some sort of a specification.

      car engine manufacturers make their products to accept and function normally using a certain grade of oil. they'll run ok using other grades of engine oil sure, but they're designed to run using a specific grade. you can't go around pouring castor oil, or baby oil into a car engine and expect it to last very long.... now.. what if baby oil were packaged in a black plastic quart jar, identical to motor oil packaging, and the product were placed on the shelf right next to the motor oil. and the baby oil happened to be tinted the same color as standard motor oil. the front label reads "OIL", and on the back in small print it reads "for use on skin only.. blah, blah, blah". what is a reasonable person going to do with this jar of baby oil? damn that chevy engine manufacturer for making an engine that melts down when it's filled with baby oil.

    6. Re:Unbelievable by tunah · · Score: 2

      And not the fact that you used the passive voice, but the fact that the passive voice was used by you.

      --
      Free Java games for your phone: Tontie, Sokoban
    7. Re:Unbelievable by tpv · · Score: 1
      This isn't the same as the car though.

      It's more like a barcode scanner.

      I don't expect a barcode scanner to function correctly with anything that's not a barcode.
      I don't expect it to be able to read Postal Barcodes
      But it damn well better not blow up in my hands when I try.

      It is reasonable for these drives to reject non standard CDs, but the machine should not be permanently damaged by them.

      Aside: It's still not 100% certain that the Mac is in fact damaged by these CDs. It seems that it may simply require the technician to intervene to remove the CD from the drive. Which is still bad design. But better than actual damage.

      --
      Read more of this story at Slashdot.Read more of this story at Slashdot.Read more of this story at Slashdot.
    8. Re:Unbelievable by CantGetAUserName · · Score: 1

      Bear in mind that the primary goal of copyright holders (no way am I ever going to call them copyright producers) is to make sure that their CD does not play in a computer CD drive. Preservation of user's property is probably not high on their list of priorities. There are only going to be so many bugs (whatever) in the CD drive's firmware. If you've found one that stops the CD playing but locks the computer solid, so solid it breaks components, what are you going to do, given the above priorities.

      Much as I don't like it, these companies have no interest in you or me except as revenue sources. If there's a possibility we'll stop spending, they'll play as rough as they can to force you.

      --
      Semper en excreta sumus solum profundum
  22. Not a big deal, folks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Apple tells how to get the job done in this tech note...not to worry.

    1. Re:Not a big deal, folks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Of course you could find it a little troublesome to read Apple's technotes when your computer is knocked-out by Celine Dion.

    2. Re:Not a big deal, folks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you can hopefully do one of the things on that page in order to get things working again. Otherwise, though, you have to send it in for repairs or do it yourself.

    3. Re:Not a big deal, folks... by Memphisto · · Score: 1

      I've just heard that instead of post-its you can cover the troublesome part of the cd by drawing with a marker on it. That should be definitely more safe than that.

  23. These aren't CDs then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    These CDs aren't CDs then, as normal audio CDs will play on a Mac, and these wont. In fact they will damage the Macintosh deliberately. Does this Celine Dion "CD" have a CD logo on it? If so, then they are liable, regardless of disclaimers on the packaging or CD.

  24. Is it just me... by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Or are those porn ads at the top of that germen site?

    1. Re:Is it just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      erotique. no problem at this time in germany (3:11 am)

    2. Re:Is it just me... by mister+sticky · · Score: 1
      Or are those porn ads at the top of that germen site?

      suddenly www.chip.de gets slashdotted, whereas people would have only looked at the translated version before..
    3. Re:Is it just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They show up on the translated page too, but in both places the good bits are covered.....

  25. OT: pr0n banners? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OT:

    Does anyone see pr0n banners on that google translation?

  26. This is ok by taya0001 · · Score: 0

    People should be punished for listening to celien dion.

  27. Apple Responds w/ KBA by mprindle · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hello all,

    Apple has released KnowledgeBase Article #106882, Cannot Eject Copy Protected Audio Disc , to adress the problem with the cd's getting locked into the drive.

    "You may be unable to eject certain copy-protected audio discs, which resemble Compact Discs (CD) but technically are not. Some computers start up to a gray screen after a copy protected disc has been left in the computer."

    1. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by imadork · · Score: 4, Informative
      Yeah, it's the fine print on the bottom that's priceless:

      CD audio discs that incorporate copyright protection technologies do not adhere to published Compact Disc standards. Apple designs its CD drives to support media that conforms to such standards. Apple computers are not designed to support copyright protected media that do not conform to such standards. Therefore, any attempt to use non standard discs with Apple CD drives will be considered a misapplication of the product. Under the terms of Apple's One-Year Limited Warranty, AppleCare Protection Plan, or other AppleCare agreement any misapplication of the product is excluded from Apple's repair coverage.

      How do you like them apples?

    2. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by znu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why should Apple pay if Sony breaks your computer?

      --
      This space unintentionally left unblank.
    3. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by TheTomcat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree.
      If [insert big-5 label here] made a CD that fell apart or melted in the drive, it wouldn't be apple's fault. This is no different.

      S

    4. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by JoeShmoe · · Score: 1, Troll

      I'm sorry, that's the fattest load of bullshit I've ever heard in my life. That's like Apple putting a big tempting red button on the side of their iMac labeled "Self Destruct" and then trying to claim that they are somehow absolved of all liability if someone actually (or accidentally) pushes it.

      You can't design a product with such a significant defect and then refuse to take any part of the blame. These things look like CDs, more often than not have CD logos on them, and in no way significanly warn users.

      What Apple should do is update their code to detect and eject any non-compliant CD. Then if there was somehow a way for the user to force the CD to load, Apple could easily escape liability.

      I smell class action. Apple, the only question is whether it's going to be aimed at Cactus or you. I suggest you do the smart thing and have a long hard talk with your CD-ROM vendor about updating their firmware and distribute the firmware fix IMMEDIATELY.

      - JoeShmoe

      .

      --
      -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
    5. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by linzeal · · Score: 0, Troll

      They should develop a firmware fix that works around copy protection and "leak it". Anyone up for reverse engineering some cd-rom firmware?

    6. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I suppose that if I buy a bacon cheeseburger that claims to be a music CD but fails horribly when I try to mount it, it's Apple's fault for selling me a computer when I'm too stupid to live?

    7. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by tbo · · Score: 2

      In other words, if you're foolish enough to buy a Celine Dion CD, Apple won't help you if you contaminate your iMac with it.

      I say, good on them.

      BTW, it won't reck your firmware, that's just typical top-notch slashdot journalism fscking up the facts. It's just slightly tricky to eject the disc, and the computer won't boot (in OS 9--X is fine) until it's ejected.

    8. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could disagree. Everything was ok with iMacs and disks or anything, and I ANYTHING, that looked, felt or smelled enough like a disk to be inserted. Apple will patch whether it means their system or biting their tounge, eating shit and begging Sony to change but Apple didnt start this and if Sony does something that breaks computers its not on Apple to follow them around.

    9. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by Robotech_Master · · Score: 2

      Well, it's not Apple who's making the defective product...it's the CD pressers. There's no reason why Apple should be under any obligation to support having these plastic coasters that look like CDs in their drivess. There's no reason they should be obligated to support having mashed bananas in their drives, either. In both cases, it's a user-action that's messing up the computer.

      The people to blame for this are the RIAA and the studios who are making these defective discs. As a friend of mine with whom I was just discussing this story put it, whether intentionally or accidentally, the RIAA is distributing Denial-Of-Service attacks on its discs. He suggests that it is at least possible they could thus be brought up on terrorism charges, as per the Patriot Act.

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    10. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by foobar104 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's like Apple putting a big tempting red button on the side of their iMac labeled "Self Destruct" and then trying to claim that they are somehow absolved of all liability if someone actually (or accidentally) pushes it.

      No, it's not like that at all. Don't be a shithead.

      You can't design a product with such a significant defect and then refuse to take any part of the blame.

      First of all, the drive isn't an Apple drive. It's a Pioneer drive.

      Secondly, this drive, and Apple's use of it, pre-dates these copy-protected CDs. You're trying to apply some standard of retroactive responsibility that just doesn't make any sense. Was Pioneer-- or Apple, by extension-- supposed to anticipate this particular event?

      Thirdly, you can't possibly be suggesting that a drive that fails when you put something that isn't a CD in it is a defective drive?? What's your standard these days, that the product must never, ever fail under any circumstances? I mean, Christ! Did you actually say class-action lawsuit? What planet are you on?

      Sheesh. Get some perspective, and stop digging up excuses to bitch about Apple.

    11. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by Dr.+Awktagon · · Score: 2

      How do you like them apples?

      What are they supposed to say? The drive is designed to play Compact Discs, and nothing else. If you put "MusicCorp(R) ShinyDiscsThatLookLikeCDs(tm)" in there, that's your problem. If they repair it when you put in that crap, they might as well repair it when your 8-year-old sticks in a 5" rotary saw blade.

    12. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by mmontour · · Score: 5, Insightful


      Thirdly, you can't possibly be suggesting that a drive that fails when you put something that isn't a CD in it is a defective drive?? What's your standard these days, that the product must never, ever fail under any circumstances? I mean, Christ! Did you actually say class-action lawsuit? What planet are you on?


      I'm damn well suggesting that a drive shouldn't fail when you put in something that is PHYSICALLY COMPATIBLE with a CD. Sure, I don't expect it to be able to handle a cheese sandwich or a sanding disc, but a correctly-sized piece of plastic should be fine.

      As another poster suggested, if it's not logically compatible with what the drive is expecting, then the drive should either eject it or ignore it. It should *not* crash, and it should (*not*)^2 corrupt any firmware or do anything that can't be cured by a cold reboot.

      I've had scratched audio CDs (being played as audio CDs, not being ripped) cause my computer to hang, because the drive did evil things to the IDE bus. That's just crappy engineering, like those "shopping cart" websites that read prices from a user-submitted form, or blindly pass user input to an SMTP client without stripping out escape sequences. In the real world, programs and devices need to perform sanity checks on their input, and fail properly when they're fed junk. The only reason we let the firmware people get away with it is that it's very hard to examine their code.

    13. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In both cases, it's a user-action that's messing up the computer.


      Not quite. In one case (mashed bananas), it's a user action that is messing up the computer. In the other, it is a record label action.
    14. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by Kris_J · · Score: 2

      Actually, it just says it's not a free repair. Of course they'll help, but get your credit card out.

    15. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by leviramsey · · Score: 2

      Actually, the labels aren't putting CD Digital Audio labels on the CD's. Philips has refused to license it for that purpose, and since they have the trademark on the CDDA logo, the labels basically have to suck Philips' cock on this issue. If they put the logo on, then all sorts of fun things could occur, such as being forced to pay for each infringing CD. I haven't seen sales figures on the Celine Dion CD, but if Sony's put the logo on, Philips could probably get upwards of $5 million dollars from that CD alone, which would wipe out much of Sony's profit on that particular CD.

    16. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by jacoplane · · Score: 2

      Apple probably have a point that these are not really CDs. Philips seems to agree with them. Remember, Philips control licenses for the Compact Disc logo. I was wondering, are these new discs labeled as compact discs or not?

    17. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by BWJones · · Score: 2

      I'm damn well suggesting that a drive shouldn't fail when you put in something that is PHYSICALLY COMPATIBLE with a CD. Sure, I don't expect it to be able to handle a cheese sandwich or a sanding disc, but a correctly-sized piece of plastic should be fine.

      Well, O.K. then. By your logic, what about a CD form factor with light reactive explosive in it? In this paradigm, if your CD player does not have the right wavelength of laser in it, the explosive reacts and destroys the disc as well as your CD-ROM drive. Don't laugh, these exist.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    18. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by BtAFMB · · Score: 1
      These things look like CDs, more often than not have CD logos on them, and in no way significanly warn users.

      And.... this is Apple's fault..... because?

      --

      "I have fallen off the wagon, for I am a slave to tea."
    19. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by bear_phillips · · Score: 1

      I have to disagree with you on Apple being liable. Someone else mentioned that Apple was selling these IMacs BEFORE this type of CD was put out.
      Cactus on the other hand seems to be looking for a lawsuit though. Unless they put a BIG RED sticker on the front, inside the cover and all over the CD warning about this, they are probably liable.
      People have been using CD's in computers for years. This record lable has been selling CD's that work in computers. Now they make a CD that looks like a regular CD but instead kills your IMac? They had better have one hell of a warning lable.

      --
      http://www.windmeadow.com/
    20. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by dbirchall · · Score: 2
      Hmmm... I guess part of the problem is that the Mac is trying to automount the volume, or some such.

      Anyway, I referred to the KBA yesterday, after the DVD-ROM drive on my wife's iBook wouldn't eject. Celine Dion wasn't to blame - our almost-3-year-old is a little too observant, and almost got the entire process correct:

      • Use the F12 key to eject... check.
      • Get DVD out of case... check.
      • Put it in, shiny side down... check.
      • Push drive closed... check.
      Unfortunately, she missed the bit about pressing down on the DVD to make it click into place, before closing the drive.

      I wound up having to use the paperclip, after trying the other approaches.

      If she's disabling Macs at this tender age, maybe she's got a lucrative career in music ahead of her.

    21. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by JoeShmoe · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Precisely. I couldn't have said it better. When you get right down to it, these copy-protected discs are defective CDs. Pioneer should have surely tested for defective CDs as part of their Q&A process. Apple also should have asked themselves the same question.

      Not to mention, these copy protection formats have been around for years. It's only now that they are in wide-scale production that we are learning this problem? Cactus et al talks about testing their discs in a wide assortment of players and not seeing anything significantly wrong. Did they not think to test an iMac?

      This is really Ford vs. Firestone for the computer industry. Only this time there are three parties that share some of the blame for this fiasco:

      Pioneer - for engineering a drive where it is possible with the wrong combination of bits or read errors to completely lock the drive and ruin the firmware.

      Apple - for engineering a machine with a soft eject and no aesthetically-challenging hard backup. Mr. Jobs, would a pinhole really have offended your out-of-wack perfectionism that much? Well, I guess that's rhetorical. So then why not a hotkey during boot to eject the media or similar? Or maybe a little coverplate over the pinhole?

      Cactus/MPAA - for engineering hazardous media without sufficiently warning or even preventing users from using them improperly.

      Now who gets the most blame? Ford said Firestone for making crappy tires. Firestone said Ford for telling people to underinflate them. Well, now Pioneer, Apple and Cactus et al are facing a similar game of finger-pointing.

      The bottom line is that it is inexcusable for a HARDWARE manufacturer to build a device in such a manner that SOFTWARE can actually cause permanent damage. That's what I was talking about with the self-distruct button.

      - JoeShmoe

      .

      --
      -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
    22. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by macwhiz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're right! I want to sue Apple for crappy firmware, too! I put a slice of American cheese in my DVD-RAM drive, and it didn't eject it right away! And now my system won't read CDs any more, and it's starting to smell funny! They designed that defect in! They should update their code to detect and eject any thing I want to put into that slot which isn't a valid audio CD, no matter how hard I mash it in!

      Er. *deep breath*

      I'm sure that neither Apple, nor the various third party vendors of 8cm optical disc media devices that provide Apple with drives, expected that someone would design a disc that appears to be an Audio CD but actually has trojan horse code on it intended to confuse the drive into nonoperation.

      I can't fault them for that.

      It's not that this copy protection system presents a few wrong bytes. It's intentionally designed to confuse the hell out of the drive, rendering it inoperative so it cannot "rip" the disc. In the process, it seems the copy protection vendors and the record labels forgot that a wide number of computers out there don't have an accessable hardware-based eject button.

      Oh, well. Sony definitely lost a sale to me in this case. I'm not buying the Episode II soundtrack if I can't transfer it to my iPod.

    23. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    24. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. That was a shitty thing for Apple to say
      2. Don't blow a gasket.
      3. If it were so obvious (as you claim) then why did Apple put that big disclaimer at the bottom of the article?

    25. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by rodgerd · · Score: 2

      Dee Emm Cee Ay.

      Wonder law in vogue.

      Dee Emm Cee Ay.

      If Apple and Pioneer were to produce a combination of firmware and software that avoided the system-destroying effect, Sony would be able to sue them for cirumventing the protection system.

      Great, innit? Sony can fuck up Apple's product line, and if Apple try to protect their customers, Sony can sue them for the "right" to keep destroying their computers!

    26. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by Daniel · · Score: 3, Informative

      But, umm, nobody is talking about exploding CDs. Except maybe you.

      Daniel

      --
      Hurry up and jump on the individualist bandwagon!
    27. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by Darth_Burrito · · Score: 1

      This is sort of like going out to buy some firewood and finding out later that the firewood you bought was hollowed out and stuffed with magnesium strips and thermite. Damn shoulda read the label.

    28. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      What Apple should do is update their code to detect and eject any non-compliant CD.

      I think they don't want to mitigate the problems this protection is causing. I think they'd rather it be a larger problem for Sony & Co. Lots and lots of entertainment industry people use Macs. If these disks fuck up their computers there will be a backlash. This is good for consumers and bad for Sony.

    29. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by truesaer · · Score: 3, Insightful
      well I agree with you for the most part. But one of the core markets for macs is the person who is so-so with computers. When they buy a Celene Dion CD at the store (something that should result in an execution), they should be able to assume it will work in a CD drive! They can't be expected to understand standard data formats, my mom still thinks there are actually pictures somehow in CDs that have digital photos on them.


      This just leads back to the question, is it the CD maker or the CD drive maker who is at fault? Both I think. The CD maker for not making their CD to specs, and the drive maker for not having a product robust enough to sensibly handle an invalid data format on the CD. I mean really, it should just do nothing....not wreck the whole damn machine.

    30. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by zsmooth · · Score: 3, Funny

      One big difference between this situation and Ford/Firestone:

      No one's getting killed.

      That's all.

    31. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      I agree, but if Apple wants to seem sincere, I think they should openly and specificly request that the culprits be prosecutted under the patriot act. I don't own a Mac anymore, but if one of my boxes was damaged by one of these mis-represented discs, I'd be talking to regional FBI very quickly. I don't HAVE a regular CD player, just my home theatre PC. I have no interest in sharing what I've payed for with others, but goddamnit if I've payed for it, I want to play it on my theatre system or my car MP3 player (I hate changing discs so I have my whole collection on the player for play in the car)

      RIAA: crash my hardware or worse destroy it with your little schemes, and I'll have you up on terrorism charges tout suite

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    32. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by ragnarok · · Score: 2, Funny
      Don't laugh, these exist

      Awesome, where can I get some?

      --
      Search first, ask questions later.
    33. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by WatertonMan · · Score: 1

      If it were physically compatible it would be screwing up the firmware now would it? The better analogy is Sony knowingly placing virus on their CDs that would attack iMacs.

    34. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by skaffen42 · · Score: 1

      Interestingly they are getting sold as CDs by most of the big names. Amazon lists it as a CD. So does Bestbuy, Barnes & Noble etc.

      --
      People couldn't type. We realized: Death would eventually take care of this.
    35. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by gotan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, so what about rubbing the CD in alcohol and insert it "flambee"? Or just a piece of ice formed like a CD? Or a "CD" out of chocolate (white, if you like)? or inserting it with nearly the speed of light? Making it up from quark-matter, or just try and construct a black hole of the right size ...

      See, i can think up even sillier examples ...

      but OTOH i could just have a damaged disk that has the same effect as copyprotected media ...

      --
      "By the way if anyone here is in advertising or marketing... kill yourself." -- Bill Hicks
    36. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by gnovos · · Score: 2

      I'm sorry, that's the fattest load of bullshit I've ever heard in my life. That's like Apple putting a big tempting red button on the side of their iMac labeled "Self Destruct" and then trying to claim that they are somehow absolved of all liability if someone actually (or accidentally) pushes it.

      NO, it is nothing like that *at all*. It's like putting a 5.25" floppy drive on a computer and claiming absolution of liability when somone inserves a proccessed cheese slice in it. It's perfectly valid...

      Now claiming a CD to be an official "CD" when it's NOT, *that* is bullshit.

      --
      "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
    37. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by God!+Awful · · Score: 2

      10 years ago, I could get Macs to hang and refuse to eject 3.25" floppies, even when you pressed the magic button. Smells like bad engineering. Looks like nothing has changed.

      -a

    38. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by FrostedChaos · · Score: 1

      ...it should (*not*)^2 corrupt any firmware or do anything that can't be cured by a cold reboot...
      Not^2.... Not not? So it *should* corrupt the firmware?
      Seriously, though, you're right... this is just crappy firmware. Either that or somebody is deliberately leaving security holes. I don't know which is worse.
      Btw... to all the idiots who compare physical failures to firmware failures... grow a brain. It is completely possible to make firmware immune to unintentional rewriting. It is not possible to make the drive proof against all physical attacks. So next time I buy a drive, I'll think twice about Pioneer!

      --
      "Any connection between your reality and mine is purely coincidental." -Slashdot
    39. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by leviramsey · · Score: 2

      The letters "CD" and the words "Compact Disc" are not trademarkable (as the USPTO does have a rule that no trademark can be a description of the product.... compact discs are, well, round things that are, relatively speaking, compact). So Sony can call it a CD. But they can't claim that it meets the CDDA standard (as it doesn't) and they can't use the CDDA logo, since that logo is trademarked.

    40. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by electroniceric · · Score: 2

      Have more than 3 trained squirrels actually experienced this problem?
      How many broken iMacs are we actually talking about?

    41. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by unitron · · Score: 2
      "...what about a CD form factor with light reactive explosive in it?"

      Should you or any of your I.M. Force be killed or captured, the secretary will disavow any knowledge of your actions.

      This disk will self-destruct in 5 seconds.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    42. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by foobar104 · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is really Ford vs. Firestone for the computer industry.

      You have got to be kidding me. Are you a troll, or what? That kind of wildly disproportionate comparison casts your whole post in an unflattering light.

      Pioneer - for engineering a drive where it is possible with the wrong combination of bits or read errors to completely lock the drive and ruin the firmware.

      First and most important: the idea that these CDs are ruining firmware seems to have come from the mind of one sloppy reporter at MacUser UK. I quote from the (f'ing dreadful) article:

      "As we reported last month, Celine's latest offering - A New Day Has Come - features copy-protection to prevent it being played and duplicated in a PC, and that same copy-protection was believed to be capable of damaging the PC's firmware. It seems that this is definitely the case, as once the CD is inserted into a new iMac it cannot be removed and the machine cannot be restarted."

      (Emphasis mine, obviously.)

      The actual fact is that the CD, once inserted, cannot be read by the Mac. If you try to reboot the Mac, something-- the OF boot loader, or something-- gets wedged trying to read the CD. Hell, maybe the drive is wedging the bus or something. Point is, if you can get the CD out, your Mac is just fine.

      To remove the CD from the Mac, reboot, and hold down the mouse button during the boot chime. The Mac (actually Open Firmware) then spits out the CDROM and boots normally. This has been true since long, long ago. I think I remember getting a bad floppy disk out of a Mac 512K or SE that way.

      If, for an unknown reason, holding down the mouse button doesn't work, then yeah, the drive has to be removed and the CD manually extracted. A person has to twist the eject cog with a tweaker or whatever. That's what the (f'ing dreadful) article was referring to when it said that the computer may have to be sent in for repair. Just for the record, I haven't heard of any instances firsthand where holding down the mouse button during power up failed to eject the CD.

      So in summary, the idea that these CDs are ruining firmware is complete, total, utter bullshit. So let's just drop that one right now.

      Apple - for engineering a machine with a soft eject and no aesthetically-challenging hard backup. Mr. Jobs, would a pinhole really have offended your out-of-wack perfectionism that much?

      I'll say it again: it's a fucking Pioneer drive. Apple didn't design it. They didn't build it. And they didn't decide whether to put an "eject" button on it.

      So then why not a hotkey during boot to eject the media or similar?

      Apple has published not one but three non-mechanical options for getting the CD out, including the hold-down-the-button trick. The hold-down-the-button trick is very well known among Mac users, and all three of them are documented thoroughly. The fact that you are unaware of them is not evidence of negligence on Apple's part.

      God, I can't believe you got so up in arms with so little information. At least get a little information before flying off the handle next time.

    43. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by walt-sjc · · Score: 2

      ... and it's apple's fault that they use shitty hardware that self distructs when you put a CD in them. Like it or not, these plastic disks ARE CD's, just not compliant with the "Compact Disk" logo requirments. If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, ...

      While I don't feel that apple did anything "wrong" by using these shitty drives, they should standby their warranty and provide a fix. Sony (or whoever created these abortions of CD's) should be sued by apple for damages too as well as by consumers.

    44. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      I mean really, it should just do nothing....not wreck the whole damn machine.

      I don't disagree with you at all, but I just want to clarify. Nothing is getting wrecked. The Mac is just hanging during boot while it tries to get some kind of response from the drive. The bad disc prevents that response from coming, so it gets wedged.

      Anybody who ever stuck a bad floppy disk in an original Mac-- the kind with no hard drive that booted off the floppy-- has seen this happen before. At first it may seem that your computer is broken, but all you have to do is get the disk-- or in this case the disc-- out. You can use a paper clip, if the drive has a hole for one, or you can just hold down the mouse button at boot time.

      The real solution to this problem is simply going to be user education. It's unreasonable to think that anybody could design a computer that will function correctly under every circumstance. It's inevitable that something unforeseen will happen and the computer will crash, or hang, or something equally bad. This is already a fairly rare occasion-- in this case it took deliberate misdesign to cause the failure. Once people start reading decent articles on the subject-- unlike the MacUser UK crap that started this thread-- they'll get informed, and the problem will go away.

      Seriously, it annoys me that this topic has given certain zealots an opportunity to hop up and down on the DMCA/SSSCA/CBDTPA/THBBBPT hot button for no real reason.

      Grr. Sorry for the venting, but sometimes you just have to let it out.

    45. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by pod · · Score: 1

      Detecting the presence of copy protection and removing such protection are different things, as I'm sure you'll agree. It would be sufficient for the drive to eject the CD.

      --
      "Hot lesbian witches! It's fucking genius!"
    46. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by pod · · Score: 1

      In that case, what about the 'Disney DVDs'? I've always wondered what was hiding behind THAT label...

      --
      "Hot lesbian witches! It's fucking genius!"
    47. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by canadian_right · · Score: 2

      I agree that Apple shouldn't void the waranty for putting in a copy-protected CD, but if you want to get snarky with someone it should be the people manufacturing defective, non-stand CD's and trying to pass them off as the real thing.

      --
      Anarchists never rule
    48. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by JoeShmoe · · Score: 2

      Okay, not being a Mac user, I don't know about the hold-down-the-button trick. My first thought when you have a CD stuck is to use the old Macintosh eject key (tm) namely a paperclip.

      But people say that iMacs lack a hole. I'm sure the Pioneer drive has one. I have a hard time believing these drive were custom engineered for Apple. Aren't they just repackaged OEM units? If so, it stands to reason they have both a soft and hard eject mechanism. So if Apple covers it, whose fault is that? Apples. But if they have a substitute approach, this hold-down-button thing AND IT ACTUALLY WORKS then great, I would agree that Apple is less liable...but being that this hold-down-button technique is another soft eject mechanism, it may not work, I don't know.

      Ask yourself this...why is it iMacs that are having this problem? There are Pioneer drives for PC. There are compact little all-in-one devices made by PC makers. There are bad experiences with copy protected CDs. But are there any that require any sort of NON TECHNICAL user intervention? I sure haven't heard of any.

      Apple prides themselves on controlling the entire platform, from the grade of power cabling all the way to the type of plastic your fingers touch. They use that as a selling point, we control the hardware, we control the software, we guarantee you cover-to-cover and Apple experience.

      Well guess what, in this case it's come back to bite them in the ass. When grandma and grandpa put in a music CD ...which looks like a CD, came in a jewel case like a CD, was found in the CD section of the store...and suddenly their computer is dead and nothing they can think to do fixes it...who is going to suffer in their eyes? I'm pretty darn sure it's going to be Apple. So you can go ahead and defend/excuse them but to me, this is something that merits a helluva lot more than a couple lines in a Knowledge Base.

      - JoeShmoe

      .

      --
      -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
    49. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by TotallyUseless · · Score: 1

      see your sig for more info

      --

      Time for some tasty Shiner Bock!
    50. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by rodgerd · · Score: 2

      You can be as sure as you like, but that doesn't mean I'll agree.

      The DMCA does not refer to removing protection - it refers to cirumventing; if the intent of the protection scheme is to have a deterrent effect (much like the rumours that some protection schemes could damage speakers), then avoiding damage becomes circumvention.

    51. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by phaserzen-x · · Score: 1

      No it doesn't. It looks like a duck and barks like a duck. If you were a CD-ROM drive, you'd be pretty freaked, too.

    52. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      When grandma and grandpa put in a music CD
      The point is, it ISN'T a music CD -- but a deliberately defective disc made to look like a CD.

      That said, it would be nice if Apple would repair the iMacs at no cost to end users, and send the bills directly to the record companies.

    53. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this happens to your iMac, DON'T PANIC!!! While Apple won't cover damage by these CDs, they will cover damage done by a slice of Oscar Meyer bologna, since sliced bologna does predate the invention of the CD-rom drive, Apple cannot deny responsibility. First, pry open the drive-- I used a screwdriver. Next, take the offending CD and hide it somewhere the Apple representatives would never think to look-- I hid mine... yeah right! Then, insert a piece of bologna, reboot the computer (just in case this fixes the problem), and call Apple. I did, and Steve Jobs personally delivered a brand new iMac to my home. I think he knew something was up though.

    54. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The hold-down-the-button trick is very well known among Mac users

      Gee. I've owned a Mac for over a year and I didn't know

      > and all three of them are documented thoroughly

      You mean I have to buy "Mac OS X: The Missing Manual?"

    55. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by eatenn · · Score: 1
      How do you like them apples?

      I don't like the sounds of them apples, Will... What're we gonna do?

      Hey, someone had to say it.

      --
      "But the cars are all flashing me, bright lights are passing me, I feel life passing me by" - Stiff Little Fingers
    56. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by mpe · · Score: 2

      Seriously, though, you're right... this is just crappy firmware. Either that or somebody is deliberately leaving security holes. I don't know which is worse.

      This isn't that different from Microsoft producting software which is "virus friendly". Even though they wrote Outlook Express to work that way the actions of virus writers are not dismissed out of hand.
      Another analogy would be the likes of "Code Red" crashing Cisco routers.
      But we are probably going to see another round of double standards with the record companies avoiding being treated the same was as "evil hackers".

    57. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by Lars+T. · · Score: 2
      What do you mean with "fail"? A DVD is physically compatible with a CD, should a CD-Drive also not "fail" to play it?

      Anyway, those not-CDs are designed not to work with the drives, you can not blame the drives for that, nor those who build them into their computers (or other devices like some players). You have to put the blame on the makers of the not-CDs.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    58. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by Lars+T. · · Score: 2

      Duh. That disc is much smaller than a CD.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    59. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by markmoss · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'll say it again: it's a fucking Pioneer drive. Apple didn't design it. They didn't build it. And they didn't decide whether to put an "eject" button on it.

      When Apple picked this drive out of hundreds to put in their systems, they assumed responsibility for any obvious designed-in defects. And the lack of a manual eject is definitely a design defect...

    60. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm damn well suggesting that a drive shouldn't fail when you put in something that is PHYSICALLY COMPATIBLE with a CD.

      I totally agree. Why just last week I punched a hole in the middle of a slice of bologna, and my fucking drive was like toasted. I mean jeez, can't these manufacturers detect and correct for a couple of processed meat products used as input. Obviously the correct thing to do would have been for the machine to detect the bologna, sprout legs, and go into the kitchen and make me a fucking sandwich. Instead I wind up with some sort of shredded meat goo all over the inside of the drive. Clearly the manufactures failure to detect meat indicates a failure in design which entitles me to sue them untill they make me a computer that will make me a sandwich.

    61. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How do you like them apples?

      I think you left out the comma... shouldn't it be....

      How do you like them, Apples?

    62. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by Tottori · · Score: 1
      I'm damn well suggesting that a drive shouldn't fail when you put in something that is PHYSICALLY COMPATIBLE with a CD. Sure, I don't expect it to be able to handle a cheese sandwich or a sanding disc, but a correctly-sized piece of plastic should be fine.
      I've stuck a DVD disc in an iMac CDR drive before now, and it correctly rejected it, so there's certain precedence for your point of view. But computers simply aren't designed to cope with actively hostile media... a CD could have an autorun program on it that would wipe the hard disk of any computer it was placed in. As the system doesn't have any way to defend against that, it's arguably pointless to run around fixing the multitude of other ways that removable media can be hostile.
      --
      use constant PERL_IS_BROKEN => $] >= 5.006;
    63. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      But if they have a substitute approach, this hold-down-button thing AND IT ACTUALLY WORKS then great, I would agree that Apple is less liable

      I think you need to choose your words more carefully. "Liable" implies "liability," of which Apple has none here.

      I really don't understand why you continue to try to make this sound like more than it is. Comparisons to Firestone and calls for lawsuits?? Sheesh.

    64. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      When Apple picked this drive out of hundreds to put in their systems, they assumed responsibility for any obvious designed-in defects. And the lack of a manual eject is definitely a design defect...

      First of all, the drive in question was, at the time it was first chosen by Apple, the one one of its kind: CD-ROM, CDRW, DVD-ROM, DVD-R. So Apple didn't choose from among hundreds of drives. They chose from among the... one. That's not really relevant; just an interesting tidbit for you.

    65. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by robmandu · · Score: 1

      I'm a big dumb firmware idiot... but is there anyway at all all you super-swank Linux gurus who know something about everything can figure out a way to provide a toggle for us know-nothings to switch between "regular CD-ROM" mode and "non-crashable basic music CD player" mode???

      --

      --
      Break the rules. Keep the faith. Fight for love.
    66. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by unitron · · Score: 2
      But since they used self-detruct tapes first, and discs later, a precedent has been established that they might make a change in media from time to time.

      They even had a dark haired guy (Stephen Boyd) the first year instead of Phelps.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    67. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by ay2b · · Score: 1

      I like how Apple claims (correctly so) that they "resemble Compact Discs (CD) but technically are not". The down side of that (for Apple owners) is this (from their KBA):

      If a disc with copyright protection technology remains inside the drive after following the procedures above, or if the computer does not start up normally, it is recommended that you contact an Apple Authorized Service Provider (AASP) or Apple Technical Support. Audio discs that incorporate copyright protection technologies do not adhere to published Compact Disc standards. Apple designs its optical disc drives to support media that conform to such standards. Apple computers are not designed to support copyright protected media that do not conform to such standards. Therefore, any attempt to use non standard discs with Apple optical disc drives will be considered a misapplication of the product. Under the terms of Apple's One-Year Limited Warranty, AppleCare Protection Plan, or other AppleCare agreement any misapplication of the product is excluded from Apple's repair coverage. Because the Apple product is functioning correctly according to its design specifications, any fee assessed by an Apple Authorized Service Provider or Apple for repair service will not be Apple's responsibility.

      --
      "Those who would sacrifice essential liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    68. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by SEE · · Score: 2

      Er, because Apple's design for its CD-ROM is incompetent? This isn't a matter of putting something in the drive that causes physical damage. This is a failure of the Apple code.

    69. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by Tekgno · · Score: 1

      But then you would be complaining because the computer would automatically eject anything you try to mash in on those cold lonely nights. Then you would have to go find a bottle instead.

    70. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by fhknack · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...and it should (*not*)^2 corrupt any firmware...

      (*not*)^2 == (*not*)(*not*)

      So you're saying it should corrupt firmware, etc.?

      Alternatively:
      (*not*)^2 == (*not*)(*not*) == (*^4)(n^2)(o^2)(t^2), but that makes even less sense.

  28. Wait it won't play in my iMac? by _PimpDaddy7_ · · Score: 1

    Wait! I own an iMac! Celine Dion latest CD
    won't play on it?!!!!

    What's the problem? ;)

    1. Re:Wait it won't play in my iMac? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What's the problem?


      The problem is that you overpaid for a crappy computer with a stupid case.

  29. Entertainment industry business plan by vegetablespork · · Score: 1

    1. Create "content." 2. Antogonize customers. 3. ???? 4. Profit

    --

    Call (206) 338-5780 COLLECT for information about a genuine BA, BS, MA, MS, MBA, or Ph.D.

    1. Re:Entertainment industry business plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WOW! Its South Park and applicable to EVERY TOPIC. You sir = COMEDY KING!

    2. Re:Entertainment industry business plan by vegetablespork · · Score: 1
      While that joke may certainly have been alluded to on "South Park," it predates it by decades.

      And I think you meant to use ==, unless your intention was to assign COMEDY KING to me.

      --

      Call (206) 338-5780 COLLECT for information about a genuine BA, BS, MA, MS, MBA, or Ph.D.

    3. Re:Entertainment industry business plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh my God the underpants gnomes have taken over the entertainment industry!!! First my underwear, now this!

      "Without my constant supervision, the world seems to go to Hell in a handbasket"

  30. Let's ask another question.... by piznut · · Score: 1

    While the question of why this kind of crap is being put out is valid, I think there is another question we should be asking. Why the hell does a computer mfgr create a machine that attempts to boot off of an unbootable volume? Is there no error checking in the firmware on the iMac? Remind me never to buy an Apple.

    1. Re:Let's ask another question.... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps part of the copy protection scheme fools the machine into thinking the cd is bootable. Or it sounds more like the drive is constantly retrying to read the disk (i have had the same happen with badly damaged disks) and locking up while it`s trying to do this.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    2. Re:Let's ask another question.... by znu · · Score: 1

      It's not trying to boot from the disc, it's trying to read the disc to find out what it is, and the boot process hangs, presumably waiting for the drive to come back with a coherent response.

      --
      This space unintentionally left unblank.
    3. Re:Let's ask another question.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the only way you can tell its unbootable is to read it. However, there should be some kind of timeout so if the device doesn't respond as expected within some fixed amount of time the media is ejected.

  31. Apple doesn't like it either by mmarlett · · Score: 1
    The funny part is Apple's tech note on the topic:
    Some audio discs use a copy protection technology that can prevent the disc from being read by a computer. This may also prevent the disc from being ejected. The audio discs are technically and legally not Compact Discs (CD format), and the CD logo has been removed from the disc. In the logo's former place is the printed message:

    "Will not play on PC/Mac"

    And it lists known offenders. Classic.
  32. Episode 2 CD (Jango Fett cover+Bonus Track) by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 1

    TDK veloCD 8x/4x/32x --- running fine.
    dbPowerAmp on Windows XP is chugging away.

    --
    "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
    1. Re:Episode 2 CD (Jango Fett cover+Bonus Track) by Galvatron · · Score: 2, Informative

      Is it labled as not playing in a PC? Apparently there should be a disclaimer if it is protected. If you don't see one, maybe there are multiple versions, or the original article is wrong. Maybe only the British version? The site's located in the UK.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    2. Re:Episode 2 CD (Jango Fett cover+Bonus Track) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ditto. Winamp won't play it with the "enhanced CD" crap on it, but I was able to rip it with no problems.

    3. Re:Episode 2 CD (Jango Fett cover+Bonus Track) by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 1

      Mabye it is only the European edition.
      A lack of copy protection would be keeping in sync with what I've seen from the gaming side of Lucas's world. I have yet to run across a LucasArts product that uses copy protection.

      --
      "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
    4. Re:Episode 2 CD (Jango Fett cover+Bonus Track) by anonicon · · Score: 2, Informative

      So far the soundtrack to Episode II is being corrupted in Europe:
      http://www.fatchucks.com/z3.cd.starwars.soundtrack . tml

      but there have been no reports out of the Ameircas. Of course, time will tell if this holds up.

    5. Re:Episode 2 CD (Jango Fett cover+Bonus Track) by Zerth · · Score: 1

      You mean like the floppy disk version of Tie Fighter?

    6. Re:Episode 2 CD (Jango Fett cover+Bonus Track) by Netbrian · · Score: 1

      Many of their older games did. This includes the Indiana Jones game, the Zak McKraken game, and I'm sure there were far more... Day of the Tentacle did too, if I recall correctly.

    7. Re:Episode 2 CD (Jango Fett cover+Bonus Track) by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2

      I don't think they'd risk not labeling it in the UK - there was a huge stink when they last tried copy protection because the shops had to bear the wrath of angry customers who couldn't play their CDs - the entire lot was taken off the shelves a few days later, to be replaced by non-copy protected versions.

      I'd expect any cactused CD to have a huge sticker on it with 'Will not play on PC CD, Will not play on Cheap CD Player, Might not play on anything else, either... avoid.'

  33. How? by Gaccm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How could a CD screw up the player? All the CDROM does is read bits off of a CD. The data should not be able to alter the program (in this case firmware) at all. The only way i could see something happening is if the firmware was poorly writtian and the CD causes stack overflows.

    --

    Only dead fish swim with the stream...
    1. Re:How? by mstyne · · Score: 2, Insightful

      From the Apple Knowledge Base:

      You may be unable to eject certain copy-protected audio discs, which resemble Compact Discs (CD) but technically are not.

      The point here is that these *aren't* CD's. It may look like a CD, smell like a CD, and quack like a CD, but these -things- don't conform to the Compact Disc standard. If they're still putting a Compact Disc logo on these things, I think consumers have a right to be torqued.

      --
      mstyne: real name, no gimmicks
    2. Re:How? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I imagine it tries to boot off the CD (remember, Apple got rid of the floppy) and since the copy protection screws up the TOC, the boot process freezes. Okay, just remove the CD, but you can't because the CD is stuck in the drive without a manual eject. In effect, a stuck CD in a stuck computer with a grey screen.

    3. Re:How? by Analog+Penguin · · Score: 1

      I don't know exactly what would cause this problem, but I can say from experience that Macs do NOT automatically try to boot off of a CD unless they have first determined that there is no other volume (internal or external HD, floppy for those who have them, etc) that can be booted. And by the time it gets to that stage, it's long past the gray screen. Whatever the problem is, it is definitely NOT the Mac trying to "automatically" boot from the CD (and why the author felt it necessary to work in a dig on Apple's dumping the floppy, I'll never understand).

    4. Re:How? by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 2

      I'd imagine that the mac scans the bus looking for devices when it powers up. Probably it looks at the CD in the drive in this process - wether or not it actually boots from it in the end - and gets mighty confused. Shouldn't people be able to use the hidden mechanisim inside the CD drawer though (use a paper-clip to access it) to eject the CD and all would be well again ?

      --
      NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
    5. Re:How? by archen · · Score: 1

      The problem is that they're mac users. They've been programed for years to move the floppy disk into the trash icon in order to eject it. Now the CD won't eject and they throw the Mac in the trash. But it still doesn't come out.

      In any event it's a sad day when an OS with a Unix core is bought to it's knees by the likes of Celine Deon.

    6. Re:How? by Fizzlewhiff · · Score: 2

      I would like to know exactly what this copy protection exploits. If it is designed to lock up a PC then I would say this copy protection is no better than a trojan horse. If I wrote code that intentionally damaged a PC of a user that was not using my software the way I had intended then I would probably be sitting behind bars.

      Exactly how big is the print that says not to be used on a PC or a Mac? Is it written in braile as well so a blind person who picks it up won't make a mistake that could damage his PC or Mac?

      Furthermore, what is the point of copy protecting CD's in one country and not another? The net is global folks.

      --

      'Same speed C but faster'
    7. Re:How? by cosyne · · Score: 2

      How could a CD screw up the player? All the CDROM does is read bits off of a CD. The data should not be able to alter the program (in this case firmware) at all.

      Well, in general, firmware is sortof a program which is kinda permanent. It determines how some programmable electronic system will operate. Firmware is often upgradable, so logically there has to be some firware update procedure, and if the beginning of a celene dion disk has something which is sufficiently close to the 'erase the old firmware now and replace it with whatever comes after this' sequence, the disk could wreak havoc on the system. What if i wrote a disk which booted and played music in macs but which booted and flashed the bios in intel machines?
      More likely, considering this disk is engineered towards some end, is that it contains some kind of 'su' command to change the operating mode of the device. This way, the disk could do things it shouldn't be able to, like take control of the drive away from the computer to prevent the disk from being read. It may be the case that when you're messing with the part of the system that says listen to computer/dont listen to computer, you also have too much access to the firware.
      just saying...

    8. Re:How? by mpe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The point here is that these *aren't* CD's. It may look like a CD, smell like a CD, and quack like a CD, but these -things- don't conform to the Compact Disc standard. If they're still putting a Compact Disc logo on these things, I think consumers have a right to be torqued.

      Or, regardless of the logo, if retailers are selling them as regular CDs or even intermingled with CDs.

    9. Re:How? by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      I have a buggy Philips DVD Deck (not PC thing) so I know how. Reading posts above, I didn't believe Apple firmware will be dead but anyway.

      To upgrade my DVD-Deck's firmware (lets call it kernel of deck), I should get a firmware file, correctly name it, insert it, turn on dvd deck, it will upgrade its firmare (kernel).

      So what if Apple, thinking of their service persons time adopted a similar machenism for bulk updating many firmwares at once and by a freaking chance that trojan Audio CD format confuses that code? Philips DVD will validate code first and won't accept it if its corrupt btw, er if there are people against their friends :-)

      Its the only way I can think about.

  34. Here we go!! by Bouncings · · Score: 1, Troll

    Everyone who has an iMac. Go get the CD, fubar your iMac, and send it in for repair under warranty. Apple might just sue their asses.

    --
    -- Ken Kinder ken@_nospam_kenkinder.com http://kenkinder.com/
    1. Re:Here we go!! by MooRogue · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you read Apple's tech note, this will not be covered under warranty.

      From the tech note

      Apple designs its CD drives to support media that conforms to such standards. Apple computers are not designed to support copyright protected media that do not conform to such standards. Therefore, any attempt to use non standard discs with Apple CD drives will be considered a misapplication of the product. Under the terms of Apple's One-Year Limited Warranty, AppleCare Protection Plan, or other AppleCare agreement any misapplication of the product is excluded from Apple's repair coverage.

    2. Re:Here we go!! by Isao · · Score: 1
      Not covered under warranty; the disc is not a CompactDisc(tm), as it does not conform to the standard.

      Apple will treat these cases as intentional user abuse and bill accordingly.

    3. Re:Here we go!! by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2

      Since when is it Apple's responsibility to sue them? Apple needs to make its iMacs bootable from CD-Rom. The CD has a functional purpose in the machine, it can't just be a music sandbox. I'd say, leave the iMacs unmolested unless you are proceeding to undertake a demonstration in court. But... proceed to undertake a demonstration in court. Class action under 'anti-hacker' statutes to prove that the (wealthy) record company is intentionally sabotaging people's property on a MASSIVE SCALE.

  35. workaround... by OklaKid · · Score: 0

    1. get a regular CD player like a Sony Walkman, or something similer (or better)... 2. line out or the headphone jack will work connected to line in on the computer... 3. use your favorite audio recording app to record on the fly as you listen... sure it might lose just a teeny tiny tad bit of quality but if you are carefull and with some adjustment you can make mp3's this way and will hardly be able to hear the difference... 4. ban copy protected music media. untill the music industry respects people right to fair use...

  36. Hold the mouse button down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you hold the mouse button down while turning a Mac on it will eject the CD from the drive before it boots up.

  37. But it's not all roses in Mac-land... by mookie-blaylock · · Score: 1

    Because if you scroll down farther, you'll see that they use this point to claim that using these not-CDs in your computer is "misapplication of the product" and that damage caused by not-CDs isn't covered by warranty.

    So while it's great that they call out the manufacturers, if your computer gets hosed by some disc, you're the one who's SOL and any repairs come out of your pockets.

    Gee, don't you just love copy protection?

    --
    I am not Herbert.
  38. Plan of action by Wyzard · · Score: 1

    OK, everyone who owns an iMac:

    • Back up your data.
    • Buy the CD.
    • (Attempt to) boot your computer from the CD, thus damaging it.
    • Get together and file a very large class-action lawsuit against the publisher or the people who made the protection mechanism, for selling a harmful product without adequate warning about its danger.
  39. Getting Back at the Mac by Grip3n · · Score: 1

    Celion has done me a favor. I used to always find myself in the Mac vs. PC war. Now I'll just throw a Celion CD in the opponents Mac and watch him cry...let alone argue anymore =)

    --
    To make a pun demonstrates the highest understanding of a language
    1. Re:Getting Back at the Mac by freeweed · · Score: 2

      Only problem is, your opponent won't have to listen to Celine, thereby conclusively winning the war.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    2. Re:Getting Back at the Mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regardless whether the CD would break the iMac, I think the mac user would cry (thanks to the *wonderful* noise that Celine produces).

      Hmm... broken iMac, or having to listen to Celine "sing", which is worse?

    3. Re:Getting Back at the Mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now I'll just throw a Celion CD in the opponents Mac and watch him cry

      Actually, I think you could throw the Celine Dion CD in just about anything and watch everyone around cry!

  40. And It Didn't Work by Tewley · · Score: 1

    Needless to say, the copy protection scheme didn't prevent the files from getting out there.

    A quick search on some of the popular P2P services reveals all of the songs from this album are available to download.

    1. Re:And It Didn't Work by Sabaki · · Score: 1

      So, buying the content and trying to use it legally causes huge cost and hassle, but downloading the content free of charge is safe?

      Are we absolutely sure the people that came up with this CD protection scheme aren't WAREZ pirates in disguise?

      Hmm...

    2. Re:And It Didn't Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No siree! I downloaded it a couple of weeks ago. It was crap, so I deleted it. But the point is that I was able to download it :-)

  41. More DMCA violations? by PunchMonkey · · Score: 1

    and perhaps others may be defeated by invalidating the outer ring of the CD with a black marker or post-it sticky note

    So does these mean sharpies and post-it notes are violations of the DMCA?

    --
    I'll have something intelligent to add one of these days...
    1. Re:More DMCA violations? by Maserati · · Score: 2

      Post-It notes use a patented adhesive. The DMCA specifies a "technological method" of circumvention, soooo... Sure ! What the heck. Makes as much sense as a lot of the recent IP rulings.

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
    2. Re:More DMCA violations? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep.. that's exactly what it means... Post-it's and black marker pens are now copy protection circumvention mechanisms, and I'm not legally allowed to discuss them with you anymore.

  42. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who would buy a Celine Dion CD anyway...

    1. Re:What? by AdamD1 · · Score: 1

      Y'know I find this interesting.

      If I burn a disc, and it's faulty, my iMac knew to eject that as an "unreadable" or "improperly formatted" disc. That would also count as a "non-CD format" disc. Pretty straightforward. I use OS 9.2, but really any pre-OSX system wouldn't have an issue with it. Out it comes, after a few seconds of trying but failing to read it. If it doesn't, and I reboot, it pops it out since it knows it can't boot from it either.

      This Celine Dion non-CD should not be treated any differently. In my opinion: iMacs Should be ejecting the disc. If you want to send a message about how much you dislike this form of copy protection, you don't penalize your customers. Hasn't Apple learned anything in the past couple of years? Their customers are becoming less and less satisfied with their choices when using the Mac OS or Mac hardware. This is another nail in the coffin.

      As it is I've moved so far away from Macs now that this is irrelevant for me anyway. I have no plans to move to OSX til Photoshop 7 comes out, but even there I may just stick with Windows anyway. At least I know how to deal with crap like this.

      And no: I do not listen to Celine Dion.

      ad

      --
      Because I can! [Brainrub.com]
  43. Re:Oh for goodness sakes!-frisbee. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " The firmware doesn't go foobar. The iMac isn't destroyed. Most CD drives have a mechanical (manual) eject that can be hit with a pen or paper clip. In that case you can just pull the CD out and you're fine."

    Be careful doing that. Boy who thought a CD could fly that far?

  44. This is a nasty principle... by AcidDan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was also reading on spymac.com that you can get around this with a nikko pen, but what I really want to say is what a precedent this sets for corporations:

    We will intentionally cause damage to your property because you did not try to play this in an authorised CD player

    I think all those affected now (and more probably in the future with CDs other than Celine) should send a nice happy bill to the corporations that produce these CDs...

    Not being a legal person, how can a disclaimer cover something designed to intentionally cripple hardware? Sure you can say in a disclaimer that "it *may* do blah blah blah" but that's a whole lot different to "If you have X this CD is designed to damage this hardware"

    ... And I also doubt that the disclaimer is in a very prominent position either...

    As someone who buys CDs and owns an iBook, I'm not looking forward to the day I pop in a decent CD I've just bought (sorry, Celine fans) I don't want to discover that I can't get the damn thing out of my lappy easily...

    -- Dan >:(

    1. Re:This is a nasty principle... by rodgerd · · Score: 2

      It's a wonderful principle, isn't it? If a group of people don't like how Starbucks or McDonalds do things and smash up their property, riot squads (paid for by the citizens against who they are being used) will appear to safeguard the company; if Sony destroy your property because they don't like what you do with it, then they get away scot free.

      Oh, and don't even think about attempting to circumvent the smashing up device. Or that riot squad will be coming for you.

    2. Re:This is a nasty principle... by Gerbil912 · · Score: 1

      I agree. Haven't any of you had a slice of salami put into your CD burner before?

    3. Re:This is a nasty principle... by gotan · · Score: 1

      And then the RIAA wonders why people don't honour their "intellectual property", when they go out and actively seek to destroy other peoples property.

      --
      "By the way if anyone here is in advertising or marketing... kill yourself." -- Bill Hicks
    4. Re:This is a nasty principle... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Compare this to a (hypothetical) warning on a car: this car's engine will crash and refuse to start again when it is accelerated over 0.3g in every third car. Then, of course, there will be no way to determine your current rate of acceleration, or whether your car is affected. OK, sure, so the Celine Dion CDs haven't killed anyone (yet, AFAIK), but the principle is the same.

    5. Re:This is a nasty principle... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ... but what I really want to say is what a precedent this sets for corporations:

      We will intentionally cause damage to your property because you did not try to play this in an authorised CD player

      There is precedent of a sort. I have a modern 45-70 ( a Marlin lever action). If I were to put the ammunition for this in one of the old, Spanish-American war era, trapdoor Springfield rifles, I would almost surely blow it up. It is possible, if you know where to look, to buy 45-70 ammunition made for modern boltactions which might do similar damage to my lever action.

      This is almost the same thing: these products are externally identical, but put one in the wrong gun and you have a big problem. The difference is first that this is necessary to get proper performance out of the modern guns, and second, that the ammunition is plainly labeled and any one who sees you looking at an old gun will reflexively mention that it can't take the modern ammunition, just in case you don't have the common knowlege.

      I think that this copy protection is analogous to somone making ammunition with an over-caliber bullet, which looks like standard stuff but will blow up a standard gun, with the express intention of punishing anyone who wants to use this ammunition in some other gun. Clearly wrong.

    6. Re:This is a nasty principle... by germinatoras · · Score: 1

      I think all those affected now (...) should send a nice happy bill to the corporations that produce these CDs...

      Good idea. I dont have the CD, so I sent $25 to the EFF. Hopefully this will give generally the same result.

    7. Re:This is a nasty principle... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You got a better way to toast salami?

    8. Re:This is a nasty principle... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2

      I think "plainly labelled" is the key here. What the CD company are doing is more like this:

      Imagine if you went to a petrol station and found out that all the nozzles were all the same colour, and only had tiny labels on them to indicate whether they were four-star, unleaded, or diesel.

  45. Get a load of this.... by vw_bob · · Score: 1

    From the apple website:

    If a disc with copyrighted protection technology remains inside the drive after following the procedures above, or if the computer does not start up normally, it is recommended that you contact an Apple Authorized Service Provider (AASP) or Apple Technical Support. CD audio discs that incorporate copyright protection technologies do not adhere to published Compact Disc standards. Apple designs its CD drives to support media that conforms to such standards. Apple computers are not designed to support copyright protected media that do not conform to such standards. Therefore, any attempt to use non standard discs with Apple CD drives will be considered a misapplication of the product. Under the terms of Apple's One-Year Limited Warranty, AppleCare Protection Plan, or other AppleCare agreement any misapplication of the product is excluded from Apple's repair coverage. Because the Apple product is functioning correctly according to its design specifications, any fee assessed by an Apple Authorized Service Provider or Apple for repair service will not be Apple's responsibility.

    1. Re:Get a load of this.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Apple computers are not designed to support copyright protected media
      I see Apple has fallen into the trap of confusing copyright protection with copy protection.

      The correct term would be "copy protected" -- or better yet some term like "copy restricted" or "corrupted" that honestly conveys the true nature of such discs.

  46. pathetic copyright protection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To copy a copy-'protected' CD:

    1) Put in stereo
    2) Plug line-out in the stereo to line-in on the soundcard
    3) Record

    how pathetic...

  47. New Names by Angram · · Score: 5, Funny

    We obviously can't call this Celine Dion product a "CD"...We're going to need a new term to denote CD-imposters...Lets see...

    CC - Crash Circle
    "CD" - Quote-Compact Disk-Unquote
    ICD - Imposter Compact Disk
    FD - Fool's Disk
    ID - Incompatible Disk
    SF - Sony Frisbee
    CC - Celine Coaster
    MW3 - Mommy, Why Won't it Work?
    RCD - Record Companies Downfall
    18POS - $18 Piece Of Sh*t
    SLS - Sony's Last Stand
    PD - Poo Disk

    Any suggestions?

    --

    GL
    1. Re:New Names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CN - CowboyNeal

    2. Re:New Names by quinto2000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Those weren't funny enough.
      How about the eminently simple "Coaster," as that about describes what it's useful for.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un post
    3. Re:New Names by Angram · · Score: 1

      Works for me!

      --

      GL
    4. Re:New Names by sconeu · · Score: 2

      IIRC, Philips calls it a "Silver Disk With Music On It." Should we call them SDWMOI?

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    5. Re:New Names by boskone · · Score: 1

      I think fools disk works best. it's catchy and now that fdd's are getting less important, perhpas it can catch...

    6. Re:New Names by clyons · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You know, this may be the point at which intellictual property and trademark laws might come to be used (very creatively, of course) in our favor.

      What do you call these discs that appear to be compact discs, but to not conform to the standards? Do the retailers know these discs are not technically CD's? Can they (record companies and retailers) even legally call them compact discs if they do not conform to the standard?

      Now, I don't know who has the trademark and intellectual property rights to the cd audio standard, but I'm thinking they wouldn't even have to take legal action. There are several laws designed to protect consumers, and I believe at least some of these apply to imitations or faximilies. I would think that if a pseudo-CD causes significant problems, certain consumer protections laws could possibly be invoked, as the imitation format does not reasonably function like the origional format.

      If the "copy protected" formats mearly cause people to have to restart their computer and perform a certain procedure to get the disc out, it may or may not be enough for legal action. However, if it causes more serious problems such as firmware damage, loss of data, etc, then I would bet it would definatly be lawsuit material.

      Either way, I would hope the intellictual property holders would begin legal action against those members of the music industry that use this format. Certainly the I.T. holders could sue for dilution of trademark, making products that look enough like their format to confuse consumers, etc.

      I'm not a lawyer, I'm just hope someone takes intellictual property laws and crams it right back down the throats of the RIAA.

      --

      --
      Intelligence is definitely a recessive trait.

    7. Re:New Names by Angram · · Score: 1

      I wonder music stores can legally put this in a "CD rack"... Do they need a new section of the store for these things, or do they have to change the signs on the racks to say "Circular music-containing objects"? Can a store named "CD Warehouse" or any other store with "CD" in the name sell these without being guilty of misleading customers? Hmm...makes you think... Will CD players have to change their names too? Will they be "CD and Quasi-CD Players Not Supporting User-Created or Digital Video Disk Disk Players"?

      --

      GL
    8. Re:New Names by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 2

      How about "Gnutella/Kazaa MP3 Fodder"?

    9. Re:New Names by tpv · · Score: 1
      Hmmm - let's see here...

      Amazon sells this silver music disk and labels it as
      Audio CD (March 26, 2002)

      No, sorry it's not. That's false advertising.

      Go into a music store and ask if they have a copy of Celine Dion's latest album on "CD".
      Then you can have a nice argument with them.

      --
      Read more of this story at Slashdot.Read more of this story at Slashdot.Read more of this story at Slashdot.
    10. Re:New Names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go into a music store and ask if they have a copy of Celine Dion's latest album on "CD".
      Then you can have a nice argument with them.


      Yeah, go try that. You'll make friends too. You're probably one of those people that goes to CompUSA just so you can show the clerks how much more of a geek you are don't you?

    11. Re:New Names by CrazyDuke · · Score: 1

      LVD - Legal Virus Disk
      CD2 - Consumer Disk
      WCD - Compact Disk based off of Windows
      PFD - Price Fixing Disk
      RIT - Recording Industry Trust
      BYC - Bought Your Congressman
      PTP - Pay the Tribute Peasant!

      :P

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced influence is indistinguishable from control.
    12. Re:New Names by sulli · · Score: 1

      well, we could call it a Silver Disk with Music on It... or just !CD.

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
    13. Re:New Names by mattkinabrewmindspri · · Score: 1

      TP?

    14. Re:New Names by I+didn't · · Score: 1

      CD - Crap Disc

      GNCD - GNCD is Not CD

    15. Re:New Names by WEFUNK · · Score: 1

      Why not...

      "FUD" for F#@ked Up Disk

      ...as well as the usual meaning of course, which is exactly the kind of co-ordinated campaign that needs to launched.

      Of course, it may be tough to get the acknowledged experts in the field (Billy G. and Stevie B.) to get on board...I doubt they have the personal experience of putting a FUD into an iMac... Although they *are* partial owners now so you never know...

      --
      My next sig will be ready soon, but friends can beat the rush!
    16. Re:New Names by Angram · · Score: 1

      You know, I thought of FUD right after I posted... It's good to know we're all on the same wavelength when it comes to stuff like this. Heh..."FUD"...

      --

      GL
    17. Re:New Names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pronounced, of course "Sodomy." (seen on Slashdot years ago)

  48. I'm reminded of a Simpsons episode by lkaos · · Score: 2

    Where the two Aliens come down and wear a Bob Dole and Bill Clinton outfit and run for presidency.

    As I'm sure everyone remembers, the aliens are found out but then say something to the effect of "What are you going to do about it with a two party system." And so they elect one of the aliens...

    Moral of the story: If you don't like copy protection, don't buy the damn cds! It's that simply.

    --
    int func(int a);
    func((b += 3, b));
    1. Re:I'm reminded of a Simpsons episode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And also stop buying Sony products. I've always been an electronics racist, refusing to buy Korean or Chinese stuff, and while there's still Matsushita, it's tempting to start buying stuff from those honest Chinese companies that just sell equipment with the features the customers want (like any-region DVD players) instead of playing all sorts of cross-industry strategy games like Sony.

    2. Re:I'm reminded of a Simpsons episode by Kibo · · Score: 1

      Moral of the story: If you don't like copy protection, don't buy the damn cds! It's that simply.

      Interesting idea. For instance, if some CD I like won't play on my car stereo which also plays mp3's, one I willingly bought what am I to do. It seems to me the RIAA increases the benefit of me pirating music, I get to enjoy the value I originally paid for. But next time, now that I know I'll have to download the music, or jump through some other hoops, what exactly would be the incentive for me to go through the now superflous step of actually purchasing the cd? To do the right thing? I don't think after they shit all over me, by tricking me into buying cd's I can't enjoy, I'll be overflowing with goodwill and an irresistable desire to do right by them. Since it has to be a pain in the butt to listen to the music I want to listen to, why should I bother with going to the store, or buying from BMG? They should've tried to lower the costs of consuming music acquired through legitimate channels rather than increase them.

      I haven't really decided what I'm going to do about it yet, as I still can't get DSL or Cable. But when I can, how difficult is that choice really going to be?

      --
      --Jimmy has fancy plans; and pants to match.
    3. Re:I'm reminded of a Simpsons episode by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 1

      Man: Well, I believe I'll vote for a third-party candidate.
      Kang: Go ahead, throw your vote away. MWAHAHAHA!!

      --

      If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
  49. What to do by ocie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Go out and buy one of these CDs. Take it into a computer store. Try it out in a computer.

    When it gets stuck, try to get help from the sales people, but try to do it with a straight face, OK? Now you will probably have to leave it there, but make sure you talk to the highest up manager before you do.

    Research on the internet how to eject the disk and come back the next day to get it.

    This might work best if you bought the CD in the same store.

    --
    JET Program: see Japan, meet intere
    1. Re:What to do by Animats · · Score: 2

      And do this at the Apple Store on University Avenue in Palo Alto, the one near Steve Jobs' house.

    2. Re:What to do by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
      Whaddya want them to do- make the things work in iMacs?

      Methinks you're gonna be putting the heat on the WRONG PEOPLE. These 'discs' not working in iMacs is GOOD. They are effectively viruses. The fact that they b0rk the iMac is just the finishing touch: it's an escalation of hostilities that might finally lead to the RIAA overstepping its boundaries in the eyes of the public.

  50. MODERATORS ON CRACK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is this "insightful" and not "offtopic"?

    1. Re:MODERATORS ON CRACK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's neither.

  51. Buy CDs or download MP3... by A+Commentor · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Lets see... if I buy a CD, it might screw-up my computer... but if I download the same mp3s, I don't have to worry about it messing up my computer...

    The music publishers are giving people incentives to NOT BUY CDs...

    --

    Looking for any old 8-bit Heathkit/Zenith software/hardware - http://heathkit.garlanger.com

    1. Re:Buy CDs or download MP3... by smart.id · · Score: 1

      But now in order to get these MP3s, you rip the CD, which you cannot because of these restrictions!

      --
      blog & fiction: jd87
    2. Re:Buy CDs or download MP3... by jdreed1024 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >Lets see... if I buy a CD, it might screw-up my
      >computer... but if I download the same mp3s, I
      >don't have to worry about it messing up my
      >computer...

      Very true. So more people are going to download MP3s. Then, 6 or 9 or 12 months later the RIAA comes back and says: "Look at this! CD sales have dropped even more, and pirated MP3 downloads have increased. We told you that we needed better copy protection. Maybe _now_ you'll believe was when we say that we need hardware copy protection." Congress will say, "We're terribly sorry - we'll never doubt you again. We'll force the CBDTPA/SSSCA/whatever it will be called through right now. Take that, pirates!".

      To combat this, people should go find these CDs, and (assuming they don't have labels stating they can't be used in a computer); buy them; attempt to play them; and then return them. Then the RIAA can't say sales have decreased, and hopefully, someone, somewhere (other than geeks) will realize that copy protection on CDs simply isn't going to work.

      What about these allegations of crappy sound? Has anyone tried returning a CD because it sounded like shit (because of the audio data itself, not the content) Did they accept the return?

      --
      There is no sig, there is only Zuul.
    3. Re:Buy CDs or download MP3... by letxa2000 · · Score: 2
      But now in order to get these MP3s, you rip the CD, which you cannot because of these restrictions!

      But as someone else said, the tracks are already in MP3 format on P2P networks.

      As has also been said, it's just a matter of finding CD-ROM drives that work. And if none truly does, just put the CD in a standard Discman, lineout->soundcard, done. It takes one person an hour to rip and share the CD rather than 10 minutes.

      Net effect is that the music is shared anyway and those of us that only listen to music on our computers have one less reason to buy the CD. Besides the fact that it's Celine Dion...

    4. Re:Buy CDs or download MP3... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EXACTLY!

      There are plenty of reasons to buy a new cd instead of just downloading the MP3s. But by doing this, they've effectively stripped us of those good reasons and made that question a lot easier to answer.

    5. Re:Buy CDs or download MP3... by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

      And I hope RIAA runs themselves right into the ground in a vicious cycle of inventing new copyright controls that incentivize people to use other forms of music creation and distribution. Finally nobody will be purchasing their broken ass products, and hopefully a whole new market will have formed. Keep going RIAA.

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    6. Re:Buy CDs or download MP3... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Re: Pemdas. Is that your website? If you, then you are one of the biggest popup whores I have ever seen. I clicked the link and was instantly bombarded by 4 spam-filled popup windows. I close the windows, click on a link on the site, and 4 or 5 more windows appeared. Why are you promoting this shit?

    7. Re:Buy CDs or download MP3... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > But now in order to get these MP3s, you rip the CD, which you cannot because of these restrictions!

      Only if you have a Mac; other systems don't have this trouble and can rip the disc, supplying Mac users with those substitute .mp3 files.

    8. Re:Buy CDs or download MP3... by macsuibhne · · Score: 1

      Is there a HOWTO somewhere that describes how to do this? I actually have a legitimate reason to want to do this (bought a language learning course on audiocassette, no CD available, want to practice when using my computer at home/work).

      Tony.

      --
      -- "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" -- Juvenal
    9. Re:Buy CDs or download MP3... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Your soundcard has an audio in plug. It's either one specially for audio input or it's disguised as a microphone plug. Plug your stereo/discman/walkman into that port (might require some adapters... depending on what wires you have lying around) and record it like you would anything with a voice microphone...

      You can record the audio natively in windows to wav files Start-> programs-> accessories-> entertainment-> sound recorder... from there you can convert it to MP3 using some shareware. There are shareware packages out there (i'm pretty sure) that make this process easier, check download.com search on 'wav to mp3 conversion' or some such. Some of them might even let you record the wav, themselves. The audio quality would probably be better that way.

      BTW, i'm posting AC because i just described a circumvention method, which is illegal under DMCA. Hopefully /. doesn't rat me out.

    10. Re:Buy CDs or download MP3... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I stopped buying cd's as soon as I started hearing about these 'copy-protected' cd's. Can't safely play 'em in the computer? Can't play 'em in the DVD player? Can't buy 'em!

      The DVD player won't play CD-Rs, which WAS my main incentive to buy music cd's in the first place, and now I'm afraid that a legitimate cd will come along and do terrible things to my overpriced speakers.

      If I do really really want that music cd by Artist X, to make sure that the cd I just bought from the local music store won't kill my expensive electronics, I have to drag out the portable cd-player, toss in the cd, connect the cd-player to the computer's line-in, and press record on Musicmatch? Or Sound Recorder. Or whatever recording program I prefer at that moment? And once I've got that done and recorded said music files to a cd-r, I need to go and get a new dvd-player that will play cd-r's? WTF?!?!

      All this so I can safely listen to the *&^% music of a cd that I bought legally and don't dare let anywhere near the *&^%@$# computer/dvd-player?

      Where in heck is the business logic in all of this? The strategic acumen?

      Make your customers afraid to buy your product; is that the new mantra of the twenty-first century?

      AC

      P.S. And I don't WANT no cd-r playing dvd-player, or new (gods! maybe they've put the magic-whammy on new cd-players and I gotta track down an old cd-player unit from the stone age!) cd-player unit that has to get hooked into the audio receiver. Gods! There is not one &^^%%$$ thing wrong with the dvd-player that I've already got!

    11. Re:Buy CDs or download MP3... by jbarnett · · Score: 2

      1) a] Get a "male to male" 1/8 inch "audio cord". (most audio stores have them) b] Or, get 2 pairs of old headphones, cut the ends and wire them back so you have 2 "plugs". (warning b] might cause static if you don't wire them back correctly).

      2) a] Plug one end into your Casstte deck/CD Player b] plug the other end into your sound card (try audio in first, if that doesn't work try the mic jack)

      3) a] Start a peice of sound recoding software (sound recorder that is with most windows versions will work) b] Press play on the tape deck. c] click "Record" on your audio software.

      4) a] Sit back and wait. b] Drink a cup of coffee c] smoke a bit d] sit back and wait (do steps a-d as needed)

      5). a] When the tape is done, click "Stop" on your audio recording software

      6) a] SUCESS. SWEET SUCESS. b] Smoke a cig in celebration c] relax

      [ Note, if you are a non-smoker or don't drink coffee this method may NOT work for you.. Please adjust accordingly ]

      --

      "`Ford, you're turning into a penguin. Stop it.'" -THHGTTG
    12. Re:Buy CDs or download MP3... by Splork · · Score: 2

      agreed. i just ordered a shakira album a few days ago which i have since heard may not be a CD at all. if it doesn't rip or play in my computer and dvd player, it goes back for a full refund!

      finding workarounds is stupid until the monopolies stop releasing anything else; it only promotes buying and accepting the invalid discs "protected" as such.

    13. Re:Buy CDs or download MP3... by madcoder47 · · Score: 1

      and just what do you think the odds are of Apple implementing any sort of hardware copy prevention?

      very slim I say.... Maybe all this copy protection jazz is just what Apple needs to boost it's market share?

    14. Re:Buy CDs or download MP3... by richie2000 · · Score: 2
      buy them; attempt to play them; and then return them. Then the RIAA can't say sales have decreased

      They will say that "pirates now buy the CD, take it home, rip it and then return it for a full refund, and oh, can we have some more copy protection to stop this, your honour, and BTW there's a pretty little thing waiting for you in your chamber afterwards". That's what they'll say.

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    15. Re:Buy CDs or download MP3... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried to exchange a cd that wouldn't play in my Chevy's factory cd player. I bought it while I was on vacation and couldn't return it without the hassle of having to mail it back to the store I bought it at. I tried to find a store that would exchange it. No one would exchange the cd. They all said that they had a policy not to take back cd's for any reason. One guy even stated that it wouldn't have mattered if I had a receipt. Ironically, the cd would play in a CD-ROM drive. I copied it, and the copy works fine in my Blazer.

    16. Re:Buy CDs or download MP3... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, unfortunately all you can do is bend over.

      Do it now boy!

    17. Re:Buy CDs or download MP3... by s.d. · · Score: 1

      What about these allegations of crappy sound? Has anyone tried returning a CD because it sounded like shit (because of the audio data itself, not the content) Did they accept the return?

      I bought a CD once at a store in MA when I was home visiting my folks from college during a break. There were some serious playability issues in my stereo CD player -- sometimes wasn't able to find the start of songs, sound quality was bad, all sorts of weirdness.

      Anyway, I found this all out when I got back to school, which was in CT, a few hours away from where I bought the CD. It was only about a week after I bought it, and I still had the receipt, so I went to a store in CT (same chain that I bought the CD at), and when I explained what the problem was, they took the CD and let me exchange it for a different CD of same price (I ended up getting one that cost $1 more and had to pay the difference, but it didn't matter). They were quite cool about the whole thing -- no troubles at all.

  52. Arrest the president of 3M. by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1
    They make a content control cirmcumvention device.

    Arrest him.

    What is the difference, except that Dimitri works for a SPAMWARE company.

  53. Someone please call the English Police by TheGreenLantern · · Score: 5, Funny

    "MacUser is running an article about how the new Celine Dion CD A New Day Has Come with copy protection mechanisms to prevent the CD from being played on a PC not only won't play on an iMac, but it will lock the CD tray (so it can't be removed) and fubar the firmware (so the machine can't be rebooted), effectivley killing the iMac."

    Somewhere a 4th Grade English teacher is crying, and doesn't know why.

    --

    It hurts when I pee.
    1. Re:Someone please call the English Police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Somewhere a 4th Grade English teacher is crying, and doesn't know why.

      Are you kidding? This is SLASHDOT -

      mass quantities of grade-school English departments are throwing themselves on bonfires and don't know why.

    2. Re:Someone please call the English Police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It is official; Netcraft confirms: *BSD is dying

      One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered *BSD community when IDC confirmed that *BSD market share has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 1 percent of all servers. Coming on the heels of a recent Netcraft survey which plainly states that *BSD has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. *BSD is collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by failing dead last in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive networking test.

      You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict *BSD's future. The hand writing is on the wall: *BSD faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for *BSD because *BSD is dying. Things are looking very bad for *BSD. As many of us are already aware, *BSD continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood.

      FreeBSD is the most endangered of them all, having lost 93% of its core developers. The sudden and unpleasant departures of long time FreeBSD developers Jordan Hubbard and Mike Smith only serve to underscore the point more clearly. There can no longer be any doubt: FreeBSD is dying.

      Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.

      OpenBSD leader Theo states that there are 7000 users of OpenBSD. How many users of NetBSD are there? Let's see. The number of OpenBSD versus NetBSD posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about 7000/5 = 1400 NetBSD users. BSD/OS posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of NetBSD posts. Therefore there are about 700 users of BSD/OS. A recent article put FreeBSD at about 80 percent of the *BSD market. Therefore there are (7000+1400+700)*4 = 36400 FreeBSD users. This is consistent with the number of FreeBSD Usenet posts.

      Due to the troubles of Walnut Creek, abysmal sales and so on, FreeBSD went out of business and was taken over by BSDI who sell another troubled OS. Now BSDI is also dead, its corpse turned over to yet another charnel house.

      All major surveys show that *BSD has steadily declined in market share. *BSD is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If *BSD is to survive at all it will be among OS dilettante dabblers. *BSD continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, *BSD is dead.

      Fact: *BSD is dying

    3. Re:Someone please call the English Police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      get out more you dull little troll.

    4. Re:Someone please call the English Police by ezzewezza · · Score: 1

      What is the problem with the quoted sentence beyond the misspelling of "effectively"?

    5. Re:Someone please call the English Police by CynicTheHedgehog · · Score: 2

      :~( *SOB*

    6. Re:Someone please call the English Police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      >>"MacUser is running an article about how the new Celine Dion CD A New Day Has Come with copy protection mechanisms to prevent the CD from being played on a PC not only won't play on an iMac, but it will lock the CD tray (so it can't be removed) and fubar the firmware (so the machine can't be rebooted), effectivley killing the iMac."

      > What is the problem with the quoted sentence beyond the misspelling of "effectively"?


      Well, it took me a couple tries to parse it, which probably doesn't indicate clear and effective communication. One might get the right idea on first reading, but it's hard to be sure.

      Ernest Gowers quoted Fowler as describing a critical reader as someone who is

      'not satisfied with catching the general drift and obvious intention of a sentence' but insists that `the words used must ... actually yield on scrutiny the desired sense'.

      I would suggest that this example should either have been punctuated better, or made into several sentences. We seem to have two ideas wrapped up there: the new CD's have copy protection and won't play on a PC, and the copy protection buggers imacs. So, we might have written:

      The new Celine whatzerface CD, titled ``Cloying Noise'', has copy protection which prevents it from playing on PCs, and completely buggers imacs. The imacs are rendered unusable because the CD's copy protection crashes the imac and disables its eject software, so the imac cannot be rebooted.

      I think that contains the same information, and similar connotations, without being quite such an unstructured mess. If I had paid attention when I was being taught grammar, I might have been able to pick some technical holes in the quoted sentence also. Usually, if it's hard to understand, there's room for technical improvement, though I'm sure we could craft counter examples to that.

    7. Re:Someone please call the English Police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MacUser is running an article about how the new Celine Dion CD, 'A New Day Has Come', includes copy protection mechanisms to prevent the the CD from being played on certain home computers. The CD will not play on an iMac, further it will lock the CD tray (so the CD can't be removed) and fubar the firmware (so the machine can't be rebooted), effectively killing the iMac.

      Try that on for size. I particularly like the very interesting use of the title of the CD as a verb in the sentence.

      Larry

    8. Re:Someone please call the English Police by ezzewezza · · Score: 1

      I will definitely agree that it could be broken up into two sentences and be clearer, but as far as grammaticality is concerned, it is an okay sentence. I think were I to break up the sentence to produce something for an online news site, I would do it something like:

      MacUser is running an article about the effects of playing the new Celine Dion CD A New Day Has Come on iMacs. The CD has copy protection mechanisms to prevent it from being played on PCs and iMacs. In addition to not playing on an iMac, the CD will lock the CD tray and fubar the firmware, effectively killing the iMac.

    9. Re:Someone please call the English Police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It should be : "MacUser is running an article about how the new Celine Dion CD, A New Day Has Come, has copy protection mechanisms that prevent the CD from being played on a PC; not only won't it play on an iMac, it will also lock the CD tray (so it can't be removed) and fubar the firmware (so the machine can't be rebooted), effectively killing the iMac."

    10. Re:Someone please call the English Police by ezzewezza · · Score: 1

      I disagree strongly with your revision. You state that they are running an article on the CD having copy protection mechanisms. The article is about how it fubars the system: "Celine Dion kills iMacs!" You don't remove much of the awkwardness from the sentence--"not only won't it play"--and you change the meaning--see above. As for setting off the title in commas, would that follow the same rules for names (cf. "I asked my sister Kate to go away" and "I asked Kate, my sister, to go away")?

    11. Re:Someone please call the English Police by jonnythan · · Score: 2

      His revision is grammatically correct - the original is a run on. The reason the title is in commas is because "Celine Dion's new CD" or whatever already exactly specifies the object iun question, rendering the actual title unnecessary. For example, I would say "Edgar Allen Poe's story The Pit and the Pendulum" because Poe wrote many stories. However, I would also say "John Candy's last film, Wagons East."

      I dunno what this "change the meaning" stuff is, but the semicolon there seperates two independent clauses where there is no conjunction.

      The revision is awkward, but at least the punctuation is correct.

  54. Lock the CD tray, yes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fubar the firmware? Hey ho, hey ho, watch that FUD-man, see him go!

    It doesn't fry the firmware. Not on any iMac I've seen. As far as locking the cd tray.. Eh, there's a little thing called a paper clip.

    No, that little hole isn't there so tiny little men can 'seed' more data into your computer. :p

    1. Re:Lock the CD tray, yes. by PMM · · Score: 0

      the new iMac's come sans little hole

  55. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is really exactly on-topic. Please mod it up again.

  56. Only the UK version! by Galvatron · · Score: 4, Informative

    Alright, I feel like an idiot because I've posted three replies on this subject now, but after checking amazon.com and amazon.co.uk, it appears that this only applies to the version sold in the UK. So British buyers beware, but the rest of us are okay (though if the Amazonian reviewers are to be trusted, apparently it is a pretty weak effort compared to Williams' prior work).

    --
    "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    1. Re:Only the UK version! by dswan69 · · Score: 1

      John Williams has pretty much been rehashing the same score for at least a decade.

    2. Re:Only the UK version! by geekoid · · Score: 2

      "The only "intuitive" interface is the nipple. After that, it's all learned.
      -Bruce Ediger "
      I can assure you that babies are taught how to use a nipple.
      One of the greatest thing that needs to be told to ecpectent, first time mother, is that they need to teach there baby how to use the nipple. I have seen many new mother break down in tears, thinking there horrible because there baby won't just latch on.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  57. Your computer has good taste!! by spineboy · · Score: 1, Redundant

    If you have the bad enough taste to play Celine Dion in your computer it sounds appropriate to me that your computer would respond in such a manner..

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  58. I'm sick of this. by ZaBu911 · · Score: 1

    I use mp3s to organize my music collection; I have hundreds of cds. It's much easier to just rip all my cds into mp3 or ogg format and listen to it like that.

    But NOOO. Some warez kiddies who like to distribute music online have to ruin this convenience for all of us.

    So I guess we got what was coming to us, even if I think that making the iMac freeze is waaaaaaay too harsh.

    Just my 2.

  59. Poor i-Macs... by fatalist23 · · Score: 5, Funny

    how horrible, dying with Celine Dion in your mouth! *shudder*

    1. Re:Poor i-Macs... by quinto2000 · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't mind dying with me in Celine Dion's mouth.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un post
    2. Re:Poor i-Macs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Careful. She's Quebecois, they bite.

    3. Re:Poor i-Macs... by MrCreosote · · Score: 1

      You would probably be the first thing in Celine Dions mouth for a long time.

      --
      MrCreosote Meow!Thump!Meow!Thump!Meow!Thump! "You're right! There isn't enough room to swing a cat in here!"
    4. Re:Poor i-Macs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, admit it, she's got a great body. I'm sure you wouldn't mind a piece of her in your mouth if the opportunity presented itself.

    5. Re:Poor i-Macs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      she's a skeleton dipped in wax
      gross

  60. Everybody stock up on Sharpies! by prisoner-of-enigma · · Score: 5, Funny

    HOLLYWOOD, CALIFORNIA - May 13, 2002 - RIAA TEAMS UP WITH MPAA TO URGE BAN OF "SHARPIE" STYLE MARKERS.

    Local busineses were shocked today when all 2.5 million office supply stores were simultaneously served with a cease and desist order from the RIAA and MPAA banning the sale of any type of felt tip marker. Lobbyists for the media industry successfully bribed and/or threatened a number of local politician, who in turn passed legislation banning the manufacture, sale, or possession of any device on grounds that it violates the Digital Millenium Copyright Act.

    "This is a great day for freedom in this country", stated I. P. Freely, chairman of the House Committee On Media Graft and Campaign Finance. "No longer will reckless hoodlums and terrorist be able to hold our great media industries down! Already these 'media terrorists' have been implicated in causing a downturn in music sales, a deepening of the U.S. recession, balding, impotence, and dandruff. These terrorists are a threat to the very foundation of this nation. Have I said terrorist enough yet? Terrorist terrorist terrorist!"

    A small group of bewildered secretaries and office workers were rounded up by jackbooted thugs and herded into "terrorist containment vehicles" (which resemble black vans) as they went into office supply stores in downtown L.A. to buy Sharpies. "Obviously these media terrorists were bent on destroying Sony Music with these devices", said one S.W.A.T. team captain as he twirled a Sharpie in front of cameras. "Don't worry folks", he said, "you're safe now."

    When interviewed on the street, many people expressed delight at the actions of the MPAA and RIAA.

    "I'm so glad that these hideous terr'rist folks have been rounded up", says Eva Beaver. "Who knows what they might've blown up with their terror weapons. Next it could be planes slamming into buildings!"

    Opposition to this new law is expected to be light, say prominent Washington lawmakers. Naysayers will be rounded up and shot on sight, further adding to the desire to keep people from pirating music and movies with felt tip pens.

    Spokesmen for Sanford, the company that manufactures the Fully Automatic Terrorist Media Stealing Assault Weapon (formerly known as a Sharpie Marker) could not be reached following a disastrous fire and explosion at every single one of their manufacturing plants.

    --
    In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us. - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
    1. Re:Everybody stock up on Sharpies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, that's some good shit - you should be a writer.

    2. Re:Everybody stock up on Sharpies! by Forkenhoppen · · Score: 1

      They're good for sniffing, too.

      (I learned that from a Dilbert episode..)

    3. Re:Everybody stock up on Sharpies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, yes, the 'assault rifle'. The popular definition of what an 'assault rifle' is completely contradicts the expected meaning of the term. That's because no half-way competant fighting force would ever bring to an assault; these thngs were not made for killing.

  61. Why not all copy protected? by mini+me · · Score: 1

    My mom has that Celine Dion CD, so I thought I'd give'r a whirl. It's not copy protected. What is the point of making only some of them protected? It seems like it is only making it harder for the casual user to use their own CD and the pirates get their music as they did before. It's the worst of both worlds.

    Of course who would want to download Celine Dion anyway, right? In my opinion, Celine Dion has almost no talent, she can't sing, and she doesn't even write her own songs. But anyway, to each their own...

    1. Re:Why not all copy protected? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may be protected but your cdrom doesn't care ...

      For example, I have
      - an UltraPlex40Max (scsi , adjustable reading speed : the perfect CDDA and NOTCDDA player)
      - an IDE DVD Player
      - a SCSI CDWriter

      When I put Shakira's "Laundry Service" (Sony, protected : "Won't play in PC/Mac") in the DVDPlayer, it hung. I rebooted and put the CD in the Plextor drive : everything ok.
      I was even able to :
      - make mp3s of the songs
      - burn a copy (which is "copy-protected" too !!!)

      Without using a pen or a post it...

  62. Am I the only one getting scared to buy CDs? by rodionpunk · · Score: 1

    Geezum, I read things like this and suddenly I'm afraid to buy CDs anymore. You can bet I'm going to be pretty cautious of buying any Sony music. If only millions of people could adopt a similar attitude. ;)

    1. Re:Am I the only one getting scared to buy CDs? by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
      You will just have to buy CDs from people like me who are putting out genuine uncompressed Red Book compliant CDs in the indie world. Generally it is easy to find the 'evil disc' status of such indies. I happen to know that there is not one CD out of the over 700 that Ampcast produces, which will do you any harm or refuse to play/rip/share/etc.

      Of course, there are financial concerns inherent in choosing indie music distributors rather than the big record companies with their economies of scale.

      In order to be able to play real CDs that are not booby-trapped to destroy your computer... you will have to pay less. :D

      But I'm sure we will be understanding if you cannot afford this, and feel you have to pay twice the money to companies who take the money and spend it on ways to make the 'discs' destroy your computer when you attempt to play them. Better the devil you know than the starving, talented, honest and cooperative musician you don't, huh? >;)

      Chris Johnson

    2. Re:Am I the only one getting scared to buy CDs? by Aerog · · Score: 2

      It's days like this that I look around my room and smile, knowing that I haven't bought a CD in months, rather the room is ever so slowly filling with vinyl. yep. Good old 12" singles. Sometimes I'm glad that I'm not a slave to (North American) popularity and prefer some good old-fashioned techno which comes on non-copy-protectable slabs of black plastic.

      . . .But the day they take that away. . .

      And the internet radio thing is another story altogether. Anyone who reads this and happens to be in the US (I have no "representative" to write to) write your representative and get Certain legeslation rejected. Please?

      --

      - Relativistic? That's barely Newtonian!
  63. Can't play it, but I can rip it. by jmv · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My mother bought the new Celine Dion CD (I've been trying to convince her to take it back for not being a "real CD"). I put it in my PC just to test it. The funny think is that the CDROM won't play it as a audio CD. However, I tried cdparanoia and I can rip it without any problem... I guess it's just another case of a "copy-protection" technology prevent legal use (like watching DVD under Linux), while failing at preventing what it's designed to prevent (you can do a mirror copy of a DVD without decrypting it).

    1. Re:Can't play it, but I can rip it. by Enrico+Pulatzo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ditto for me and a copy of "Stiff Upper Lip" by ACDC. Can't see the music in Explorer, but CDEX rips it just fine.

    2. Re:Can't play it, but I can rip it. by julesh · · Score: 1
      I guess it's just another case of a "copy-protection" technology prevent legal use (like watching DVD under Linux), while failing at preventing what it's designed to prevent (you can do a mirror copy of a DVD without decrypting it).


      Its a common misconception that the scrambling of DVDs was designed to prevent copying the discs... in actual fact, it has two purposes:

      • to prevent you from copying the disk and changing the region code on it
      • to make DVD manufacturers dependant upon the MPAA due to the fact that they have to license some of their IP (i.e. the descrambling routines)

      It was of course because of the second of these that the MPAA felt so threatened by DeCSS, not the first...
  64. Greedy businessmen... by LittleRibbon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's all about the companies getting greedy. Instead of 'losing' a few dollars on the price of each CD, they spend thousands to get the CD 'guarded'. Completely ridiculous, and a result of greed in our society.

    Then there's the junk going on about them safeguarding the CD's so they can't be played on a computer. Personally, I'm not the richest person around, and I can't afford a CD player seperate from the computer. I lodged my money into this thing about two years ago, and continue to do so, thinking "Hey, I can play my CD's on here, and write my papers, etc., rather than drive up the electric bill (damned prices last year for electricity...) with two seperate Watt-Guzzelers, as I call them. So, I saved some money there, right?

    I ended up buying a few cds the other day, after listening to them on the radio. I pop in the Lord of the Rings OST, remembering fondly the music that scared me in the movie, and waited for it to load. Instead of my lovely music, I get a webpage with a bunch of ads I don't want, and no auto-start on the music. So, naturally, I checked to see if the files were missing or something. Sure enough, they've been 'protected' against use on a computer. So, I wasted $18, and I still haven't listened to the thing once.

    Now, they're making the computers crash on us, just for fear of 'stealing' their 'hard earned songs' (even though most of them are just rewrites of old classics). Next thing you know, they'll ban CD-Roms. --;

    --
    "Those who fear the darkness have never seen what the light can do."
    1. Re:Greedy businessmen... by proxima · · Score: 2

      Hmm..I experienced the auto-load of the LOTR soundtrack, but I had no problems whatsoever ripping the CD into my beloved 256 kbit ogg files. I bought it the day it came out, (the movie), checked to make sure it wasn't from Universal (it's Warner Bros I believe), and ripped it right away. Most CDs now I don't even listen to before I rip.

      Give it a try, but don't tarnish the beautiful music by ripping it into crappy 128 kbit mp3s.

      --
      "The universe seems neither benign nor hostile, merely indifferent." --Carl Sagan
    2. Re:Greedy businessmen... by Seor+Pelo · · Score: 1

      hmm. it may not autoload, but I doubt that it's copy-protected. Try running it through winamp, (play/audio cd). The same thing happened to me on the Our Lady Peace - Spiritual Machines album.

    3. Re:Greedy businessmen... by alcmena · · Score: 2

      ...rather than drive up the electric bill (damned prices last year for electricity...) with two seperate Watt-Guzzelers, as I call them. So, I saved some money there, right?

      Probably not. Stand alone CD players (especially portable ones) use very low power. In fact if you were only using your computer as a CD player, then the amount you'd save by turning off your PC and running a stand alone player would pay for the player eventually. Depends on how often you'd use only the CD player, and how much power costs where you are.

      In fact, a portable CD player may even use less power to play a CD than the additional power your computer would use to play the CD. The portable player is designed to use low power, whereas CD-ROMs are not, unless you have a laptop.

    4. Re:Greedy businessmen... by LittleRibbon · · Score: 1

      *nods* I've tried this. It literally cannot find anything except Autorun, Desktop, lor-splash, START, and STARTERFILE. So, there's nothing there for Winamp to play. Same thing happened with my Abandoned Pools album. Nothing there that Winamp can play. (Er, technically, it can play this little clip from one of the songs that plays on the page it takes you to when you pop in the cd, but otherwise none."

      --
      "Those who fear the darkness have never seen what the light can do."
  65. Yup, permanent damage; nope, Apple won't cover it by dpbsmith · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Apple Knowledge Base article #106882 confirms the problem with "certain copy-protected audio discs, which resemble Compact Discs (CD) but technically are not," and says Apple will not pay for repairs even if you have a service contract.

    http://kbase.info.apple.com/cgi-bin/WebObjects/k ba se.woa/116/wa/query?searchMode=Expert&type=id&val= KC.106882

    The note suggests a number of things you can "try" or "attempt" which "may" solve the problem.

    The telling part is the last paragraph:

    "If a disc with copyrighted protection technology remains inside the drive after following the procedures above, or if the computer does not start up normally, it is recommended that you contact an Apple Authorized Service Provider (AASP) or Apple Technical Support. CD audio discs that incorporate copyright protection technologies do not adhere to published Compact Disc standards. Apple designs its CD drives to support media that conforms to such standards. Apple computers are not designed to support copyright protected media that do not conform to such standards. Therefore, any attempt to use non standard discs with Apple CD drives will be considered a misapplication of the product. Under the terms of Apple's One-Year Limited Warranty, AppleCare Protection Plan, or other AppleCare agreement any misapplication of the product is excluded from Apple's repair coverage. Because the Apple product is functioning correctly according to its design specifications, any fee assessed by an Apple Authorized Service Provider or Apple for repair service will not be Apple's responsibility."

  66. Who knew.... by Y-Crate · · Score: 2

    .....the Celine Dion CDs came with an iTunes upgrade?

  67. What were they thinking? by SageLikeFool · · Score: 1

    So now people that want to listen to the new Celine Dion music on their Mac will be forced to download the mp3's?!?! Now there is a brilliant marketing strategy. Does anybody really believe that the copying protection will stop the mp3's from being made?

  68. But I dont HAVE a fucking STEREO!! by eggstasy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How can these idiots somehow assume that everyone has a stereo or some form of computer-independent CD player? You wouldnt believe how small a percentage of my friends actually plays their CDs on a stereo. Why, I once foresaw the death of stereos altogether: Why spend a boatload of cash on a huge machine that can do exactly one thing (play CDs - radio sux, tapes are dead, LPs are deader), when you can do the same with your PC?
    Why have a TV/Stereo/DVD/VCR/whatever when you can have it all in your PC?
    Ah, wait, if you spend a boatload of cash on huge, clunky, technologically outdated devices such as a TV or a 1x CD player, Big Business is happy. And since the government is just for show and it's actually BB who's running the place, the "consumers" really have no choice - fork over your cash time and time again, or live like a peasant in the Dark Ages, with no comfort at all.
    I'm sick of this. Where do I point my gun at to get my God-given rights?
    Since they're all trying to label us as terrorists I say shoot the bastards and earn the title!

    1. Re:But I dont HAVE a fucking STEREO!! by Have+Blue · · Score: 2

      The number one fallacy of Slashdot:

      Just because you and all your friends agree on something does not make it a fact!

    2. Re:But I dont HAVE a fucking STEREO!! by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

      I'm sick of this. Where do I point my gun at to get my God-given rights?

      Try these guys:
      Libertarian Party

      --
      Libertas in infinitum
    3. Re:But I dont HAVE a fucking STEREO!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Home theatre systems these days are meant for one and one thing only: DVDs. You don't need bazillion speakers to play a stereo source.

    4. Re:But I dont HAVE a fucking STEREO!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LPs aren't dead if you're a DJ. I'm sitting in my friend's room, the entire floor space is covered with racks, floor to ceiling full of vinyl.

      You are not special. You are not the only person on the planet. You do not speak for me or any of my friends. You do not define the human race, so stop acting like you do.

    5. Re:But I dont HAVE a fucking STEREO!! by ironicallyyours · · Score: 1

      And now Sony's plot is revealed: In addition to making cds that cannot be played on a computer, sony also makes home cd players.

    6. Re:But I dont HAVE a fucking STEREO!! by tempfile · · Score: 1

      > Why have a TV/Stereo/DVD/VCR/whatever when you can have it all in your PC?

      Because it's nice to be able to watch TV/DVDs/tapes/listen to a CD/LP/whatever without having to use the loud, time-consuming to start up PC?

    7. Re:But I dont HAVE a fucking STEREO!! by eggstasy · · Score: 1

      Uh, my Linux box starts up in what, 10 seconds?
      I cant be blamed if you like running MS BloatOS 2002.
      Why do you turn it off in the first place? MS BloatOS crashes? Use Linux. It really whips the llama's ass.

    8. Re:But I dont HAVE a fucking STEREO!! by tempfile · · Score: 1

      I fucking use Linux. I turn my computer off because I want to sleep at night. There you go.

    9. Re:But I dont HAVE a fucking STEREO!! by eggstasy · · Score: 1

      Im sorry, mine doesnt make any noise.
      I use a Pentalpha CPU cooler, I have two case fans aside from the PSU fan, my Kyro II card also has a fan... and... I never really understood why people say PCs are noisy.
      Handy hard drive tip, though, Seagate rox! I have only heard my HD once, but I had to really try and listen to it. And its a 7200 too.
      I dont know how silent it is where you live, but I have a bus stop below my window and Very Loud Bus Noises start at 6am here and are constant throughout the day. My PC does make a humming sound but it's negligible compared to music and TV etc.
      Maybe your fans need oiling or something. I dunno. I'm sorry if I got on your nerves :(

    10. Re:But I dont HAVE a fucking STEREO!! by tempfile · · Score: 1

      You didn't get on my nerves, just on my Linux user pride ;)
      My PC is very silent with 12V Papst CPU fan at 5V, resistors in the GeForce fan cables and a noise-blocking case. I live in a quiet area and during the day with the windows open I can't hear the box at all. It annoys me at night, however.

  69. actually, that's not such a bad word ... by timothy · · Score: 1

    The copy-protection scheme itself may not be, but the reliance on harebrained, short-sighted laws to bully people out of reasonable use of the products they buy (DMCA and the Hollings nightmares) could well be called "capitolism" -- in stark contrast to "capitalism" :)

    Cheers,

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  70. Warning Labels? by Slurpee · · Score: 1

    Surely there should be warning labels put on these pretend CDs, as well as big signs in the store?

    I mean, people are buying these things thinking they are CDs, but in reality they AREN'T CDs! They are designed to look and act LIKE cds, in most situations.

    In fact, isn't this fraud....selling things to us deliberately made to LOOK like a CD, but isn't a CD (and thus may not work in any device that claims to play CDs!)

    this is just unbeliveable.

    1. Re:Warning Labels? by gerardrj · · Score: 1

      And what of those who purchase these discs on-line?
      I just did a quick check of Amazon and there is NO mention of this issue on the official section by Amazon.
      A prominent user review does mention it.

      What obligation will on-line retailers have to discover and disclose the presence and type of disc protection who can't see the shrink-wrapped package in the store?

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    2. Re:Warning Labels? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Your computer CD-ROM drive likely has the "Compact Disc Digital Audio" logo on it, which
      would lead you to believe it will play CD's.

      A reasonable person buying one of these discs would expect the drive with that logo to be able to play it, since as you say, it looks like a CD, is sold alongside other 'real' CD's, it fits in the drive, etc. They want to pawn these off as legitimate CD's in order to take advantage of the huge market for CD's. But it is not a real CD, and they should be prohibited by law from selling them as such. I agree, it sounds like fraud to me.

      In fact, if you took the disc up to a clueless store employee and asked them, "excuse me, is this a compact disc?" They would of course say yes and sell it to you. Seems like you could then sue them for fraud and/or misrepresentation of the product. I really hope Phillips, the other co-inventor of the CD, defends the standard and takes these recording companies to court. Pretty soon people will just stop buying CD's because they can't tell if it will play in all their official "compact disc digital audio" drives.

      And as someone has already pointed out, the only way to listen to Celine Dion on your computer will be to download the mp3's! I wonder if the geniuses at the record companies thought this through..

    3. Re:Warning Labels? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about separate sections in the music stores for teh CDs and the non-CDs? We can only guess which section people will frequent. Anyone remember the whole DIVX snafu? I can see it now, little Jessica "educating" Jenny as she wanders into the "wrong" section looking at the psuedo-CDs and telling her she can't rip them for her MP3 player. And they thought CD sales were low now.

  71. *sigh* by Pierre · · Score: 1

    The CD player in my computer is the only one I own.

    I really hope this doesn't catch on with good music.

    1. Re:*sigh* by Control-Z · · Score: 1

      Well, Shakira and Jennifer Lopez CDs are also copy protected. That's closer to good music... Just a matter of time.

  72. False advertising. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on you pinheads. If you're going to go after anyone, sue them for false advertising or misrepresenting their product.

    They make their product look like a CD, but it isn't really a CD *is it*?

    I wonder if Lucas knows that the music from Episode II won't play on his Mac?

    1. Re:False advertising. by borgheron · · Score: 1

      Philips owns the trademark on the CD labeling. Even if the disc is round and shiny, if it doesn't have "CD" printed on it, it's not a "CD".

      GJC

      --
      Gregory Casamento
      ## Chief Maintainer for GNUstep
  73. This has to stop by Thomas+A.+Anderson · · Score: 1
    Regardless if these cd's casue damage or not, this has to stop. We have a legal right to play these cd's (and dvd's - remember we aren't supposed to be able to watch them in linux) on any system we want. Period. The only way to get through to the music and movie industry (besides a lawsuit) is to boycott them. Don't buy new cd's or dvd's.

    "But I want my music (and video)" you say. Same here, so I suggest *only* buying used cd's and dvd's. That as good as a boycott. And, so far, it's still legal (the selling and buying of used cd's and dvd's. Even if it wasn't, I would fight to the death my right to sell my old cd's and dvd's.

    --
    Personally its not God I dislike, its his fan club I cant stand (bash.org)
    1. Re:This has to stop by Will_TA · · Score: 1

      Hear Hear!
      I like this idea. Teach the coporate fat cats who's really in charge (unless the American Government would like to ban boycotts because they "harm the industry...")

    2. Re:This has to stop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think there is any "legal right" involved WRT playing CDs in PCs vs. stereo CD players etc etc. While we all seem to agree that you *should* be able to do so, I don't see how/where there are any legal protections/rights that say a CD *must* be playable in all devices. If a manuf. says "cannot be played in Macs/PCs" then it is buyer beware.

      Ditto the issue of making copies. There is no "right" that says manuf/publishers must enable you to make copies. If you can make a copy (and you are not pirating) then you are protected under Fair Use. However if you are thwarted in your copy making due to copy protection then you have no legal recourse (and no, your "Fair Use" rights aren't being violated.)

    3. Re:This has to stop by SimCash · · Score: 1
      #3514035 wrote:
      We have a legal right to play these cd's (and dvd's - remember we aren't supposed to be able to watch them in linux) on any system we want. Period.
      (Covers mouth and coughs "bullshit!").

      That would be like buying an old vinyl 45 RPM record, then complaining that it would not play on your Victorphone with the wax cylinder playing system. When you buy a CD you have the right to play it (and expect it to play) only in the hardware it was designed for. There is no requirement that it play in hardware it was not designed for. When copies were analog (vinyl to tape), no one cared because (1) tape prices included a small kickback to the recording industry to cover the opportunity costs of piracy, and (2) 3rd or 4th generation copies were interesting exercises in white noise.

      The fact that you can make flawless digital copies does not mean you have a right to do so any more than the fact that you can walk into a corn field and take corn means you have a right to do so.

      You may convince yourself that you are making copies only for your own convenience (certainly my MP3 collection means I don't have to dig out individual CDs to play songs I like), but once you post them or distribute them, you are nothing more than a common criminal with a nifty distribution plan. The fact that you do not charge for your copies moves you from "common criminal" to "common vandal" since you are really only doing the damage for the fun of it.

      The fact that this battle is between a shitty, pop-culture stealing, value warping music industry and a bunch of snotty-nosed vandals just means that most of us (I hope) are on the sidelines waiting for the damn half-time show, hoping that it will be better than the fekkin game. When I want to support music, I go to a damn concert.

    4. Re:This has to stop by Thomas+A.+Anderson · · Score: 1
      Wait, wait, wait. Nobody said anything about copying cd's - just playing them. There are plenty of legit reasons why somone would want to play a music cd on their computer. Maybe it's not a legal right as I wrote above (wishfull thinking on my part), but it's a use of cd's we can (and should) defend.

      --
      Personally its not God I dislike, its his fan club I cant stand (bash.org)
  74. no more CDs for me. And I used to buy lots. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This "Copy prevention" crap is the final straw for me. I'm not buying any more CDs until this bloody copyright battle is over with. I don't expect it will take more than a few years.

    Fortunately, I don't feel much need to buy CDs anyway, since I discovered www.emusic.com. It isn't perfect, but it is pretty damn good, and it's worth signing up just on principle. It's the only sensible way for record labels to distribute their stuff: unencumbered digital files, in this case MP3s.

  75. Way to eject CD on new iMac by pinkpineapple · · Score: 5, Informative

    You need to restart the system and just after the chime, leave the mouse button pressed until the media gets ejected. No manual way but a work around for people who like me got cought with the soundtrack of Episode 2.

    PPA, the girl next door

    --
    -- I feel better now. Thanks for asking.
    1. Re:Way to eject CD on new iMac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just asked the girl next door and she doesn't have an iMac, doesn't have the soundtrack of Episode 2, and doesn't know what Slashdot is.

      Sorry, but you are *not* representative of the average girl next door.

    2. Re:Way to eject CD on new iMac by zaffir · · Score: 1

      I was just wondering if that would work. Can you still reboot your iMac now? Is everything "ok"? If so, why do the people at MacUser insist you have to send your iMac off for repairs? Sure, it makes Sony (and the RIAA) look bad, but its likely to cause unnecessary hassles for iMac owners.

      --
      "Upon attaching the waterblock to my penis, I began to notice that I know nothing about computers." -- JRockway
    3. Re:Way to eject CD on new iMac by telstar · · Score: 2
      a work around for people who like me got cought with the soundtrack of Episode 2
      • I think you mean ... 'got caught with a Mac'
    4. Re:Way to eject CD on new iMac by binarybum · · Score: 1

      you talked to a girl?

      Sorry, but you are *not* representative of the average /. user.

      --
      ôó
    5. Re:Way to eject CD on new iMac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you returned the "CD" ?

  76. Way to go Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CD drives have a mechanical (manual) eject that can be hit with a pen or paper clip. In that case you can just pull the CD out and you're fine.

    The new iMac doesn't have any manual way to do it.

    They spend 2 years and 3 million dollars designing a computer that looks like a lamp and they forget to include a manual eject mechanism. Somehow, coming from Apple, I'm sot surprised.

    Anyway, can't you see this is a Miracle? Clearly, this is God's way of ridding the earth of two evils (Céline Dion's CDs and iMacs). Mac users take this as a sign: you bit the Apple but God still loves you.

  77. Somebody please... by famazza · · Score: 2

    ... take a look at CD not playable surface and tell us if there is, or if there isnt't, the CDDA (Compact Disc Digital Audio) logo on it.

    If it is, then this shall be an article to Philips lawyers. If it isn't the CD isn't even compatible with your stereo CDPlayer.

    --

    -=-=-=-=
    I know life isn't fair, but why can't it ever be un-fair in MY favor!?
  78. A new day for... by thelinuxking · · Score: 1

    Quote: the new Celine Dion CD A New Day Has Come

    Q: A New Day Has Come for what?
    A: Apple Tech Support, of course!

  79. watch out following translated instructions by flacco · · Score: 4, Funny
    You never know - a babelfish translation deficiency could result in instructions like:

    "Then schtick ze blow torchen up your assen-holen, and ge-crank that mutterfikken all ze way uppen-leder-hosen."

    --
    pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
  80. Insist on Genuine Compact Discs by B.D.Mills · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The music companies are quietly removing the CD logo from some of these controversial copy-protected CD's because they do not conform to the Red Book standard.

    So here's a way we can fight back. When you are buying your CD's, always insist on CD's bearing the "Compact Disc Digital Audio" logo.

    This does two things:
    * Any copy-protected disc that bears the CD logo may be in technical breach of some law, such as misleading and deceptive marketing, and you can possibly sue the store and record company on those grounds (IANAL) or make a formal complaint to some regulatory body such as the FTC.

    * It lets the store know that there are people who prefer genuine CD's instead of that crippled copy-protected rubbish. Once you buy the CD, it's your right to do with it as you please, provided you do not infringe on the copyright owners' rights to redistribute the music.

    --

    The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke
    1. Re:Insist on Genuine Compact Discs by thumbtack · · Score: 3, Interesting

      More Fast and Furious doesn't have the logo on the outside packaging, but does use the CD Audio Logo on the CD itself. I don't know about others, but this one does.

    2. Re:Insist on Genuine Compact Discs by Bob9113 · · Score: 1

      Of the four CD's immediately to my left, only one has a CD logo. All predate these defective CD experiments. A brief look around at the record store recently showed similar evidence.

      But that is irrelevant. A CD being in a rack full of CDs at a music store implies that it is fit for certain purposes, like playback in any common CD playback device. Why would I give music stores the mistaken impression that I accept responsibility for reading the labels to ensure that a CD acts like a CD? They should bear the responsibility of making it clear that the product is defective. If they do not, they should bear the pain of restitution if it does not function as implied.

      Is the following also a case of buyer-beware?

      "This car requires CNG to run. I don't have a CNG vendor near my house. The dealer never told me, and the sticker didn't say anything about it."

      "You didn't see an 'Unleaded Fuel Only' label on the fuel gauge did you? You didn't look to see what the fuel filler looked like? If it didn't have a clear indication that it was gasoline powered, how can you blame the dealership?"

    3. Re:Insist on Genuine Compact Discs by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

      I havn't bought any new cd's an a looooong time. We bought the kids the "Uhcle Kracker" cd (they were hooked on the song 'follow me'.) I just grabbed the cd and looked at it. On the CD itself the 'compact disk/digital audio' logo is missing, but it is present stamped on the plastic box that the cd came packed in. IANAL, but I think that nails Atlantic records, this better be a real cd!

      Many of the newer CD's don't have the logo on the CD itself because the graphic design artists have claimed the entire front surface of the CD as their canvas.

      Anyway this cd DOES play fine on my kid's computer (runs windows 98), though I havn't tried it under CDparanoia yet.

  81. Ah, here we go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ha ha fucking ha, let's start the 300+ messages of "hohoho! Who cares! Who listens to Celine Dion anyway!!" again, as everyone shoots for +1, Funny.

    Joke all you want. If this can happen to a Celine CD, it can happen to any other CD in Sony's collection as well. The point isn't Celine, the point is they are TRYING TO FUCK THE CONSUMER with this shit, and they don't care.

    Celine is the first, there WILL be others. When a musician YOU like gets crapified by Sony and Cactus, will you then shoot for +1 Funny? Didn't think so.

    1. Re:Ah, here we go... by The+Flying+Blacksmit · · Score: 1

      Quite right. "Coming soon to a musician near to your heart...." Don't these turkeys know that when travelling, I listen to CDs (and watch movies) on my laptop. You didn't think I carried it for WORK did you? To let a CD like this near your system, you'ld need to have rocks in your head! These creeps think they're doing themselves a favour, actually, they're screwing their own market. And good riddance.

  82. ...and it is all a waste of time by inhalent · · Score: 1

    Of couse all of this effort is a waste of time if it can be found easily on your average P2P network. So of course I had a look at Kazaa(lite) and sure enough it looks like the entire CD is online anyway...

    All this effort that the label went though hasn't done what it is supposed to. All they have in the end is a decline in sales, bad PR... and legitimate consumers that will stay as far away from the most common way to get music. Buying it in the store.

    I had over 400 cds and this drives me wild. MP3's sound like crap most of the time, but if it worth buying I will. I normally buy a CD (that I want) on its release date, but now I am scared because I don't know if I can play it the way I want to.... consider me the scared consumer (and geek)...

  83. Apple is aware of the problem; here's the solution by Rui+del-Negro · · Score: 1

    This isn't the only disc that gets stuck in Macs. Here's an article from Apple that mentions two other discs and also the solution. Click here to read the article.

    Still, it's pretty silly that they forgot to include a manual eject button; if the power supply dies, for example, your disc is stuck until the computer is repaired.

    RMN
    ~~~

  84. Pay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pay for education? Oh, you americans crack me up! :D

    1. Re:Pay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you evade taxes, then you non-Americans pay for education too.

      Even if you *don't* take advantage of it.

  85. Patent Infringement? by Angram · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If it isn't a "CD" does this violate the patent on Compact Disks, as it is same technology, just with a few 0s and 1s?

    --

    GL
  86. Re:New Names (How about Corrupt?) by anonicon · · Score: 1

    That's the term I use since a perfectly fine standard (the Philipps/Sony CD standard) is being corrupted to do something it wasn't made to do.

    For a listing of corrupt CDs, check out my site at http://www.fatchucks.com. It may be helpful...

  87. Simply refuse to buy these non-CDs by sheldon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Look, don't play the music industry game. Don't bother to figure out how to defeat the copy protection that just makes them try harder.

    Just don't buy the CDs.

    Or better yet, buy them, open them, then take them back to the store and complain that they don't work. If the store will only offer an exchange, take the exchange and bring that one back too. Just keep doing this until they learn that they do not work.

    The stores can't put them back on the shelves, they have to ship them back to the distributor. I guarantee you when 25% of their stock comes back defective, someone is going to start to notice what a really bad idea this is.

    Hmm, I work right next door to a Best Buy. I could buy and return a CD every day for lunch. Might be kind of fun.

    1. Re:Simply refuse to buy these non-CDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if a product does not work, the store is legally required to give you a refund.

      Play Less http://www.mp3.com

    2. Re:Simply refuse to buy these non-CDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hmm, I work right next door to a Best Buy. I could buy and return a CD every day for lunch. Might be kind of fun.

      Yes, you could... but will you?

    3. Re:Simply refuse to buy these non-CDs by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      Figure those CD's Apple names? They are real clever. They know the listener profile of Celine Dion etc, they know they are... (you name it) and they won't boycott etc.

    4. Re:Simply refuse to buy these non-CDs by HRH+King+Lerxst · · Score: 1

      careful now, you might get arrested!!

      --
      No one got beat up more often than the mimes of the old west!
    5. Re:Simply refuse to buy these non-CDs by geekoid · · Score: 2

      "Hmm, I work right next door to a Best Buy. I could buy and return a CD every day for lunch. Might be kind of fun."
      sounds fun, I think I'll give it a whirl myself.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  88. Cant the consumer... by Transcendent · · Score: 1

    ...file a lawsuit against the label since they purposely damaged their computer? Isn't distruction of property an illegal thing??

    I want to see someone take this to court. Too bad I dont buy celine dion...

  89. Drives shouldn't do this, anyway by iabervon · · Score: 2

    Okay, so you have some software which is vulnerable to malformed data which has been fed to it by an unsuspecting user, and it causes damage to your system. Rather than providing fixes, the vendor blames the users and the source of the malformed data. Apple's CD drives have a major security hole. It is being exploited by malicious hackers, who have produced attacks which lure people into subjecting their computers to them by promising to contain music.

    Sure, people shouldn't buy these things. Sure, the people who make them should be treated as the computer criminals they are. Sure, Celine Dion should remind people of Melissa. But Apple should really fix these things. Computers that won't work if the CD drive gets messed up? CD drives that trust discs to have valid data, and can be permanently damaged by discs with data errors? I certainly hope their network cards aren't so lousy...

    1. Re:Drives shouldn't do this, anyway by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      Try sticking a peanut butter and jelly sandwich in to your CD drive and see what happens... that is a very good analogy to what is happening to the iMacs.

      CPCDs are not CDs and don't support CD standards. If they did they would work fine in the standards compliant iMacs. They also won't work in many car cd players and several PC brands as well.

      This is the fault of the CPCD makers not Apple.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    2. Re:Drives shouldn't do this, anyway by Tassach · · Score: 3, Insightful
      BZZZT. Wrong Answer. Thanks for playing. There's a huge difference between a PB&J sandwich and a shiny-disk-with-music-on-it. There's no way a reasonable person could confuse a sandwich with a CD; nor would a reasonable person expect to be able to insert a sandwich into their computer and have it play music. However, it is a reasonable expectation to put a shiny silver disk with music on it into a device that is normally used to play shiny silver disks with music on them, and not have said device melt down.

      A more fitting analogy would be if you sold rat poison pellets that looked just like jelly beans. Saying "well, if you read the fine print on the box, you would have known that they were rat poison and not candy" wouldn't cut it as a defense when you get hauled into court.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    3. Re:Drives shouldn't do this, anyway by iabervon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In general, it is wrong to assume that anything will comply to standards. "Be strict in what you produce and permissive in what you accept." Now it would be different if, for instance, these discs would cause physical harm to the mechanism directly (i.e., they would melt or reflect the laser in odd directions, or something). But it should be impossible for a disc with pits merely in an invalid configuration to damage the drive.

      Of course, it would be fine for the drive to not play these discs. Since they're invalid, there's no reason they should work. But they shouldn't be able to damage the drive or the computer. I bet the car cd players don't make the car swerve wildly. And, if they did, I'm blame the car manufacturers more than the disc manufacturers.

  90. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! (Sign-Up Here) by anonicon · · Score: 5, Informative
    Hey,
    If you are a U.S. resident (you don't have to be a citizen) and want to be part of a class-action lawsuit, go here:
    http://www.fatchucks.com/z3.cd.submit.html

    after you buy a known corrupt CD (one with a red star next to it):
    http://www.fatchucks.com/z3.cd.html


    I will personally forward your info to the group of lawfirms who are already planning a class-action against the record industry. If you have any questions about this class-action or anything else, write me at chuck@fatchucks.com.


    Peace.

  91. won't any copy protection be pointless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because aren't there some steroes or cd players that have a line out feature. So simply play cds on cd players, line out to your computer, line in with an ATI card, and you are okay. Am I missing something because I know nothing about audio? :)

  92. Hi-Tech vs Low-Tech by j_kenpo · · Score: 1

    I love it when Hi-Tech mechinisms meet low tech solutions. A post it note defeating copy protected CD's is great, I mean less than 1 cents worth of paper defeating what is probally thousands, if not millions of dollars worth of R&D into copy protection schemes. Its along those same Hi/Low tech meetings as using a pencil to overclock the Duron, or even the old exploit in the Scantron tests where you could just fill in all the bubbles. It just goes to show you, theres always a use for the junk around your desk...

  93. Re:Oh no! (Aphex Twin) by anonicon · · Score: 1

    You're probably just being a smart-ass, which I appreciate. :-D

    FYI, Aphex Twin is as bad as Celine too. Check out reports about their latest CD here: Aphex Twin: Drukqs

    Yee-ha, let the good times roll.

  94. USE A DRE ERASE MARKER by rveno1 · · Score: 1

    Instead of using a sharpie I recommend using a dry erase maker (you know the marker used for the white boards)

    the reason is that this marker will not leave any major damage to your cd (I hope)

  95. Overcome the protection you must by yoyoyo · · Score: 1
    Why functions, is fast avowed: With the copy protection that hangs CD a TRACK with corrupt data behind the audio range.

    Ok, computer translations are getting better, but reading a translated german website is like getting instructions from Yoda.

    --

    --
    I have taken more out of alcohol than alcohol has taken out of me - Churchill
    1. Re:Overcome the protection you must by MxTxL · · Score: 2

      Afraid, are you?

    2. Re:Overcome the protection you must by mikefoley · · Score: 2

      That's Herr Yoda to you and me...

      --
      What's my Karma Mr. Burns? "Excellent"
  96. They have it all wrong.. by j_kenpo · · Score: 1

    Although it is preventing the music from being played in a computer, its not really a copy protection scheme. Its a protection mechinism to save us from the damage caused to people if Celine Dions music would actually have to be listened to. Ecch, makes me shudder to think of it, oh the humanity.....

  97. hrmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have the new Celine Dion CD, (Yes I am a fag), and I was able to copy/play it perfectly.

  98. Your analogy is bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, its just as if they had put a big "do not press" button on the box. You fucking idiot.

    Apple is not at fault, the CD does not comply with the standards in fact it intentionally breaks the standard. It is not reasonable to expect every cd drive to be compatible with every conceivable standard bastardization or disc defect. That would be extremely inefficient. No one makes hardware that way nor should they.

    The problem is with the disc not the drive. Try to get that through your thick stupid head.

    1. Re:Your analogy is bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Compatible, no, but barring hardware damage no box should refuse to boot simply because a removable medium isn't readable, especially when they neglected to give users a mechanical way to remove the medium (that doesn't involve booting the box).

  99. Hole punch... by Colz+Grigor · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am reminded of my teenage days of punching notches into the side of 5 1/4" disks with a hole punch...

    Magic markers to avert copy protection schemes... I love low-tech solutions to high-tech problems.

    ::Colz Grigor

    1. Re:Hole punch... by superflippy · · Score: 1

      Heh. I'd forgotten about that one. Remember covering the holes on tape cassetes with scotch tape so they could be written over? Hm, I wonder if opaque tape would work as well as a post-it note on these CDs? It might be less likely to come off in high speed drives.

      --
      Your fantasies contain the seeds of important concepts.
  100. Maybe this is why I saw a lady and her daughter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    carrying their iMac into CompUSA today. Puts a new perspective on things doesn't it? High we're the Record companies and your 7 year old daughter is an mp3 pirate.

    1. Re:Maybe this is why I saw a lady and her daughter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      High we're the Record companies and your 7 year old daughter is an mp3 pirate.
      Assuming you're talking about Celine Dion's "CD": If the 7-year old daughter actually was a MP3 pirate, the lady wouldn't have an iMac that refused to boot! This corrupted-"CD" nonsense just punishes the people who pay money for a non-U.S. copy of Celine's album.
  101. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! (Exactly) by anonicon · · Score: 1

    No shit. I take it most people on slashdot have some real or imagined techical skill at various levels. The other 90% of the public doesn't and shouldn't have to in order to play a frigging CD in their computer - it's not rocket science.

    I'm hoping that these CDs will boomerang in Joe Public's eyes so that sales drop enough to warrant the banishment of copy-protected CDs which neither protect their audio content nor are CDs. Hopefully "Uou can fool some of the people some of the time, but you can't fool all the people all the time" will kick in at some point between now and Christmas.

    In the meantime, if you want to do something now, check out some suggestions I came up with at my site:
    http://www.fatchucks.com/z3.cd.action.html
    or join the class-action lawsuit:
    http://www.fatchucks.com/z3.cd.submit.html .
    It's not hard, but it does take a minute to act.

    Peace.

  102. Obligatory AYB bit... by sconeu · · Score: 4, Funny


    In A.D. 2002, War was beginning.
    Mac Hacker: What happen?
    User: Somebody set us up the Celine Dion Not-CD
    Programmer: We get signal
    Mac Hacker: What!
    Programmer: Main Screen turn on
    Mac Hacker: It's You!
    R.O.S.E.N.: How are you gentlemen?
    R.O.S.E.N.: All your CD-ROM drive are belong to us.
    R.O.S.E.N.: You are on the way to destruction
    Mac Hacker: What you say?!?!
    R.O.S.E.N.: You have no chance to hack make your time
    R.O.S.E.N.: HA HA HA HA....
    Mac Hacker: Take off every Not-CD
    Mac Hacker: You know what you doing
    Mac Hacker: Remove Not-CD
    Mac Hacker: For great justice

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    1. Re:Obligatory AYB bit... by Calamity+Jane · · Score: 1

      Man, that is so summer 2001...

    2. Re:Obligatory AYB bit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er...

      "Main screen turn on."
      "It's crashed!"

      ...

    3. Re:Obligatory AYB bit... by mh_tang · · Score: 1

      All your funny are belong to a year ago.
      You have no originality, time is up.
      Take off every karma.

  103. how about this: by SaturnTim · · Score: 2

    Has anyone who purchased one the the CD's in question contact their local Better Business Bureau? When I buy something that looks like a CD, is sold in the CD isle, I don't expect it to hose my iMac.

    Let's get as many agency's in on this as possable.

    --T

    --
    http://www.theMediaBunker.com
  104. Canataxada? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A) Find a better record store - may I suggest A&B Sound
    B) If you don't like putting part of your wages toward social services, move to the States, shithead.

  105. No shit! by SpinyNorman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    2002-04-03 17:39:55 New Celine Dion CD will crash your computer (articles,news) (rejected)

  106. So? by sconeu · · Score: 2, Insightful


    <SARCASM>
    What do you care, unless you're an Evil Hacking Terrorist Content Pirate(tm).

    Only Evil Content Pirates want the DMCA overturned. Stinking Terrorist.
    </SARCASM>

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  107. How is this a "dig on Apple's dumping the floppy"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I imagine it tries to boot off the CD (remember, Apple got rid of the floppy) and since the copy protection screws up the TOC, the boot process freezes.

    Not a dig, just a reminder to non-Mac users who assume every computer has a floppy drive. Touchy, aren't we?

    Unless you were being sarcastic, in which case it was a bit too subtle for me to handle. (Wouldn't be the first time...)

  108. NO, USE A DR. DRE ERASE MARKER by Dr.+Awktagon · · Score: 2, Funny

    ha ha ha I made a funny

    1. Re:NO, USE A DR. DRE ERASE MARKER by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1

      Excellent :) If I ever get mod points, I'll fight the rockers!

  109. Getting people to buy more CDs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever since LPs, Cassettes and other formats that physically would wear out disappeared, the record companies have been freaking out. They make the most of their money on people buying their content over and over again. CDs were great for this at first, everyone went out and replaced their record collections with the new media. But CDs lasted too long, and worse, can be BACKED UP!

    Soon, the record company will only sell DRM media, that will require you to keep a subscription to the record company service, or else your media wont' play anymore.

    Bottom line: record companies want to charge you over and over again to listen to music.

  110. I like the bit about the Warranty there by zzyzx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Apple designs its CD drives to support media that conforms to such standards. Apple computers are not designed to support copyright protected media that do not conform to such standards. Therefore, any attempt to use non standard discs with Apple CD drives will be considered a misapplication of the product. Under the terms of Apple's One-Year Limited Warranty, AppleCare Protection Plan, or other AppleCare agreement any misapplication of the product is excluded from Apple's repair coverage. "

    So not only is the computer broken because you didn't see the fine print and tried to play a cd in it, but you have to pay for the repairs.

    1. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by Cramer · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'd hold them both to blame. The copy protection technology fucked up the cdrom's firmware, so they are obviously responsible. The idiots that wrote the firmware that can be fucked up by the data on the disk loaded in the drive are also responsible for such idiotic programming.

      I've seen a number of (very old) plextor drives freak out and crash when presented copy protected content (PC games.) However, none have ever rewritten their firmware. (And the 6plex isn't field rewritable... you have to pull the EEPROM out.) Later models (8plex through 32plex) have write-protect jumpers.

    2. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Which is, of course, a crock. If I burn a CDR on a drive that I didn't know was wonky, then pop it into an Apple-supplied machine for testing and it, through some magic combination of bits, toasts the drive's firmware, this isn't Apple's fault why?

      They choose the drive supplier, allegedly put it through some kind of testing procedure to ensure it meets minimum quality standards, and yet it allegedly toasts itself via this _perfectly reasonable action_ on the part of the consumer.

      Apple has a commitment to support their users; let them turn around and bill Sony (or whoever) for T&M on all returned machines. It's completely irresponsible to foist this off onto the consumer.

      [note to zzyzx; I'm not picking an argument with you. I'm responding to Apple here, not you :) ]

    3. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by mark_lybarger · · Score: 2

      i don't see how you blame the firmware writers. they create the firmware to conform to CD specifications. sure we all would like our software/firmware whatever to be robust and withstand any potential rot, but in all reality, it must meet the requirements and the specifications. the firmware creators for these drives certainly can't create firmware that protects the drive from every possible application of the drive. if this were true, we'de need to expect bicycle manufactueres to design and create bikes that can withstand being run over in the drive way (which by the way is actually more likely to occur than for someone to put a damaging non-CD metallic disk into their drive).

    4. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's like saying it is OK for a car to burst into flames if it goes above 65mph because the law provides an upper specification limit. Simply meeting specifications is NOT ENOUGH for good code.

    5. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by mark_lybarger · · Score: 2

      no, but it is ok for the engine to blow a rod through the crank shaft when it's been running 11,000 rpm's (not the redhat type) for a few minutes. those engineers should have used better rods/crank shafts in their engines, eh?

      everything has it's limits and software/firmware is no exception.

      if a gun goes off unexpectedly because it was loaded with improperly manufacturered bullets, is it the fault of the manufacturer of the gun or of the bullets?

    6. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by tunah · · Score: 3, Insightful
      So not only is the computer broken because you didn't see the fine print and tried to play a cd in it,

      No, it is broken because you tried to use a product designed to look like something useful (a trojan horse) but break your computer, sort of a hardware equivalent to a trojan horse. Imagine you plug in a monitor and immediately the big internal batteries deliver a huge voltage to your motherboard through the (onboard) video.

      but you have to pay for the repairs.

      What is certain is _apple_ does not have to pay for the repairs, as their product is not at fault. In the (farfetched) example above, would the computer or 'monitor' company have to pay?

      --
      Free Java games for your phone: Tontie, Sokoban
    7. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by Dr.+Zowie · · Score: 1, Troll
      No, actually, it's Apple's fault for not foreseeing similar types of problem.

      Software should never crash, no matter what input you put into it. That's taught in every first year programming class I've ever seen, and it goes double for software that controls peripherals.

      Apple has done shit like this before. In 1988, I owned a floppy with the interesting property that inserting it in a Macintosh while the Mac was running would crash the mac.

      Yes, Sony are being horrible by breaking the CD standard. No, that doesn't absolve Apple for writing crappy driver software.

    8. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by Iamthefallen · · Score: 2

      Yes, software should never crash, but sorry to say, this isn't a perfect world. Apples iMac, and most other CD readers are designed to read CDs, that's Compact Discs(tm), not compact discs.

      Difference being that the CD(tm) has a defined format, a CD reader is as designed to read other similar discs as much as it's designed to read a cheddar cheese slice inserted to it. And if I insert cheddar cheese, I don't really expect the CD player to come up with a nice little box telling me it can 't read cheddar cheese.

      Yes, it could possibly handle it better, but, it's not designed nor meant to be able to read those other compact discs.

      --
      Wax-Museum Fire Results In Hundreds Of New Danny DeVito Statues
    9. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by gvonk · · Score: 5, Funny

      Software should never crash, no matter what input you put into it. That's taught in every first year programming class I've ever seen, and it goes double for software that controls peripherals.

      Also, please note-- Automobiles should never crash, no matter what happens on the road. That's taught in every first year driver's education course I've ever seen, and it goes double if you are driving an expensive car.

      --


      El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
    10. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ah but if its a firmware crash through design, it doesn't matter how good your driver software is...remember achiles and the tortoise in G.E.B? ;-)

    11. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by psamuels · · Score: 1
      Yes, software should never crash, but sorry to say, this isn't a perfect world. Apples iMac, and most other CD readers are designed to read CDs, that's Compact Discs(tm), not compact discs.

      Sorry, but that's just lame. You can explain anything with "this isn't a perfect world". Putting a 5.25 inch round plastic thing in a CD-ROM drive might make it spin for awhile and sound funny, but when I press the Eject button it had better pop that sucker back out and act as though nothing had happened.

      It's not like you're subjecting something to strong magnetism, or some other physical influence outside the engineering parameters. You aren't wearing out your motors spinning a too-heavy disc, or scratching your lens with bits of metal stuck to the CD. No, this is merely reading signals from a laser, for which there is no excuse for any kind of permanent damage to the device.

      In the software business, if an application is publically accessible (say a network server) and you can crash it with random data, we call this a "denial-of-service attack" and it is classed as a security bug. Even Microsoft take these things seriously nowadays - NT4 is ridiculously easy to crash from untrusted network access, but the RPC infrastructure in NT5, from all reports, is much more robust.

      --
      "How can you claim that you are anti-crack, while still writing a window manager?" — Metacity README
    12. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by mpe · · Score: 2

      Difference being that the CD(tm) has a defined format, a CD reader is as designed to read other similar discs as much as it's designed to read a cheddar cheese slice inserted to it. And if I insert cheddar cheese, I don't really expect the CD player to come up with a nice little box telling me it can 't read cheddar cheese.

      Except that a slice of cheese does not have the same physical properties as a CD. A better question would be "does it lock up if you insert a DVD?"

    13. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by Iamthefallen · · Score: 2
      Sorry, but that's just lame. You can explain anything with "this isn't a perfect world". Putting a 5.25 inch round plastic thing in a CD-ROM drive might make it spin for awhile and sound funny, but when I press the Eject button it had better pop that sucker back out and act as though nothing had happened.

      That's what it should do if it was perfect, just like using a soundcard input interface which gets a 200watt feed from a guitar amp shouldn't kill my computer, but it probably will. There are things that a computer is designed to do, and that's what it should do, the fact that a user is easily mislead by these protected "cds" isn't the device makers fault imo. Just like I can't blame my puter maker for allowing me to feed 200w into the soundcard, it wasn't built for it, and it's not their responsibility to make sure I don't mess up. If I use non-standard equipment with my computer, then I also take a chance and assume the responsibility should it fail miserably. Just because the consumer is easily mislead doesn't mean that the maker is responsible.

      imo the culprit here is 100% the cd maker, their cds shouldn't be able to do this to a machine. If a machine isn't capable of playing it as is intended, it should just appear corrupt or empty, not mess up the machine.

      If we go back a few years when floppies were common, what if an app requires a boot from a floppy, but on boot, instead of running the app, it flashed the bios to corruptness (in an attempt to "upgrade" it of course) and deleted all partitions on all drives, is the fault the floppydrive makers, the computer makers, or the maker of the floppy disk?

      I'd say the latter, I expect things to work a certain way, if I boot from floppy, I expect to be asked about any permanent changes, if I insert a cd-like media I expect that any cd-reading device can handle it gracefully by adhering to standard, if the reader can't actually read it, fine, but don't ruin my player because it can't handle it. Device makers trust media makers to not create media that is dangerous to a consumers equipment, and by that trust they also give responsibility to the media maker to NOT run any malicious code without the user approving it, which is the norm.

      The alternative would be devices that won't run anything which isn't approved by the maker, home-made cds? Forget it, it might do naughty things to a machine and people would blame the device maker.

      --
      Wax-Museum Fire Results In Hundreds Of New Danny DeVito Statues
    14. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by Steve+X · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's what it should do if it was perfect, just like using a soundcard input interface which gets a 200watt feed from a guitar amp shouldn't kill my computer, but it probably will.


      As the previous poster noted: this is data that's causing it to die. Not something that's out of the limits of the device's normal ranges (200w for a poor leetle soundcard) but something that's well within the 1 or 0 range of binary data. I agree: software should never crash, especially when it's hardware.


      In general, hardware should be designed defensively. All-too-often, hardware will encounter problems provided by our imperfect world that might cause them to crash or fail. An example: I've been working on a robot recently with a microcontroller on it. The microcontroller has a power input with a very primitive reverse-voltage protection circuit on it (a diode and a poorly-placed capicitor). If you connected the voltage wrong, the capicitor blew and the device was rendered useless until you removed/replaced the capicitor. This is bad design. True, it's going out of the limits of the device's inputs, but not unreasonably so. (200w for an input that normally takes orders of magnitudes less vs. reverse polarity)


      A cdrom that fail to physically function on bad data is also poor design. That's like old computers that, if certain bits were twiddled incorrectly they would physically catch fire and burn. People make mistakes (in this case, intentionally), and you as a designer should trap for them as best as possible.


      one last example: this is a buffer-overrun root exploit. well, not really, but the same principle is applied: inputting data that's unexpected and causing malicious actions to occur. Buffer-overruns are one of the most prolific types of bugs that cause problems in software and people try and remove them for a reason. With that in mind, one would hope your CD-ROM would never, ever crash.

    15. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by Iamthefallen · · Score: 2

      So because it looks similar it should handle it? It's still not the same media. By that logic if I wrap a circular cheese slice in tinfoil it's a cd and thus should be handled properly. I can't agree, different media need different readers, unless a combined CD/Cheese reader is released.

      --
      Wax-Museum Fire Results In Hundreds Of New Danny DeVito Statues
    16. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by Lars+T. · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How the hell is Apple supposed to know before the not-CDs appear on the market that they will not be compatible with the drive they choose? Next you will tell us that Apple is responsible for Macs damaged by the earthquake, because they should have forseen it.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    17. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by troels · · Score: 1
      There are things that a computer is designed to do, and that's what it should do, the fact that a user is easily mislead by these protected "cds" isn't the device makers fault imo. Just like I can't blame my puter maker for allowing me to feed 200w into the soundcard, it wasn't built for it, and it's not their responsibility to make sure I don't mess up.

      You are of course correct that your soundcard wont survive 200W input, but your example is flawed. If you want to compare playing a copyrighted cd on a cd drive with music you should try something like: If you sing out of tune the microphone and amplifier will blow up. You wouldn't expect this would you? Just as you wouldn't expect scratched cd's to damage your cd drive. There really are no excuses. It is possible that apple will not be liable for the damage in the US, but here (Denmark) they will be forced to cover it within the warrenty period. (the law required a minimum warrenty of 1 year from purchase until 2001, and raised it to 2 years this january)
    18. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      I guess you didn't use Apple for a while. Apple OS, as Linux/BSD and other real OS'es locks CD'es when mounted. Yes, ATAPI tray lock command.

      There are many reasons for this as their common environment (mission critical) and they are making a good thing. Like, nobody'es slipped finger will cause a major crash because CD is removed (Happened once to me, on Win2k install).

      Also, Apple Mac users are used to "no eject button" stuff (floppies), which in fact, really helps prevent data losses.

      So, Apple OSX, OS 9 etc uses tray locking documented ATAPI feature, software (kernel,firmware) makes the job of eject button, those trojan audio CD's makes it crash. I wonder what happens if you put a DVD into a CDrom drive on Linux and try to mount it... Yes, via console, runlevel tricks, you can fix it but regular user can't.

      So, no need for Apple bashing here, we should bash people not boycotting those CD'S (oh, no, I don't say get mp3es of them, just be patient) and made this stuff fade away in weeks. Imagine Celine Dion's face when she hears her CD has sold just 100 pieces for a week... And her producers face... Understand?

    19. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by ortholattice · · Score: 2
      Software should never crash, no matter what input you put into it. That's taught in every first year programming class I've ever seen, and it goes double for software that controls peripherals.

      Yes, but *where* is the software? Part of the software is the bits stored in the firmware. Another part of the software is the (corrupted) bits stored on the copy-protected CD. After all, CDs hold programs, too - and the Mac seems to get confused about "what" is on the CD since it is corrupted. It responds to this confusion in an unfortunate way, and I agree of course that it shouldn't have been designed to respond that way, but nonetheless it is still responding to a "program" of corrupted bits on the CD.

      If I gave you a bootable CD-ROM with an .exe that instructed the CPU to erase your disk drive if certain "copy protection" features weren't present on your machine, would this be the CPU's fault?

    20. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by I+didn't · · Score: 1
      Software should never crash, no matter what input you put into it. That's taught in every first year programming class

      But we're learning how to crash a Turing Machine in third year...

    21. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by Surak · · Score: 2

      Software should never crash, no matter what input you put into it. That's taught in every first year programming class I've ever seen, and it goes double for software that controls peripherals.

      Gods! Someone please tell that to the programmers on this planet! Especially the ones working at Microsoft! :)

    22. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by plumby · · Score: 1

      And if I insert cheddar cheese, I don't really expect the CD player to come up with a nice little box telling me it can 't read cheddar cheese.


      True. But I also don't expect it to read the cheese, and attempt to execute it in a way that would break my computer.

      If the cheese melted and gunked the computer up, that would be a different matter, but having the computer be able computer read arbitrary code and then break in an irrecoverable way is bad.

    23. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by Mawbid · · Score: 1
      It's OK and expected for the computer not to do anything useful with bad input (a physical object in this case). It's not OK for it to become unable to function and process valid input as a result. Remember the Yorktown? Entering 0 into that field was an error, but the application software should have survived it. Failing that, the application software could have gone beserk, but the operating system should have survived that.

      It seems to me that you're not just saying that Apple can be forgiven for this, but that it wasn't a mistake.

      Your parent post and mine are not talking about how things are, only about how things should be. We can agree that invalid input should not destroy a system, even though we all know it's very hard to design such reliable systems.

      --
      Fuck the system? Nah, you might catch something.
    24. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      Apple is just covering themselves in case of wide spread problems. However, it has been my experience that for most hardware problems, Apple will quite happily repair the device at no cost to the consumer. Besides, technicaly speaking, Apple is not responsible. There is a warning on the hardware which states it should only be used with approved media, and there is a warning on the CD which says you shouldn't use it in a computer. Therefore, you have been sufficiently warned and legaly speaking are responsible for any damages to your computer.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    25. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by psamuels · · Score: 1
      Just like I can't blame my puter maker for allowing me to feed 200w into the soundcard, it wasn't built for it, and it's not their responsibility to make sure I don't mess up.

      I guess you missed the part of my post where I said "It's not like you're subjecting something to strong magnetism, or some other physical influence outside the engineering parameters." The "fake CD" is not supplying any excess wattage here. It is a passive medium - if the CD-ROM drive is being screwed up it is the CD-ROM drive itself that caused it.

      According to other threads here this discussion is mostly moot anyway - apparently there was some bad reporting, and the CD-ROM drives in question do not actually sustain any permanent damage. They just refuse to eject the CD via software means (which for a Mac apparently means you have to reboot and eject via Open Firmware). That situation is more acceptible, though I still think it is bad design on the part of either the device, the software driver, the ATAPI CD-ROM protocol, or all three. (And yes, I know that would make three separate culprits here - I'm not solely blaming Apple now.) I know about the "software drive locking" commands, and I agree that they are necessary, it's just unfortunate that the software driver can get itself wedged with bad input such that it never unlocks the drive - which is what appears to have happened. Probably Apple's fault, but like I said, possibly at least partially a hardware problem.

      Speaking of whom, I fondly remember the user manuals for the Apple ][+. This is back when the manual came with a schematic for the mainboard - seems odd now, doesn't it, actual technical information in a user manual, and from Apple of all people? This would have been 1983 or so, but I still distinctly remember the bit where they encouraged you to play around with your new, powerful, wonder of modern 8-bit technology. Paraphrasing: "Nothing you can do will cause permanent damage (unless you type with a hammer)."

      Ever since, I have held computers to that standard. If a component is flash-upgradable, it should have fail-safe provisions where the code that actually reads the updated ROM off a floppy and writes to flash memory is not itself part of the update. (When I first heard about flash upgrades, I immediately thought, "Oooh, nasty, that violates the Apple ][+ Prime Directive!" Well, I didn't actually think "Prime Directive" but that was the sentiment.) It should always be possible to clear out the NVRAM in a computer by means of a jumper or something equally fail-safe. Monitors should refuse to run past their rated bandwidth and v/h-sync parameters. (Modern ones do refuse - older ones didn't, and you could fry them that way.) No computer component should have a "self-destruct" command. Except perhaps smart cards, for security purposes, when you enter the wrong PIN too many times. All hardware with moving parts must check input and not allow those moving parts to be damaged.

      I honestly don't think any of this is too much to ask.

      --
      "How can you claim that you are anti-crack, while still writing a window manager?" — Metacity README
    26. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by greed · · Score: 1
      If I burn a CDR on a drive that I didn't know was wonky, then pop it into an Apple-supplied machine for testing and it, through some magic combination of bits, toasts the drive's firmware, this isn't Apple's fault why?

      I think there's confusion over crashing vs. damaging the drive's firmware. If the drive has crashed, you cannot send an eject command to it--even via the front-panel button. The firmware isn't necessarily damanged, but until you get it to reset, you can't do anything with it.

      The solutions all involve rebooting and using something stronger--open firmware (via mouse button or keyboard commands) or OS X. OS 9 is a good thing to avoid.

    27. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by hkmwbz · · Score: 1

      They won't have to know. They are simply safeguarding themselves. For example, stuffing a pizza in your CD drive is bound to go wrong. So they simply say that they do not support anything but proper, valid CDs.

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    28. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by arkanes · · Score: 2

      You're misunderstaning his point - sure, if you hook a 200watt feed up to your soundcard, it will fry. This is because you are submitting it to an extreme physical environment outside the engineering parameters. Now, how would you feel about a digital amp that turned crashed and fried if you play a certain sequence of notes? I'd say the majority of the blame lies on the makers of the CD - they intentionally release a product that can damage your property when used in a normal fashion. Warnings that it "won't play" in a mac are insufficent. But Apple should repair these under warranty because, as the poster above says, this is a SOFTWARE glitch causing the problem. There is no excuse for a CD to be able to fry the firmware like that - if it can, it's a bug, full stop.

    29. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by Mr.+McGibby · · Score: 1

      Automobiles don't crash, people crash them.

      Computers crash all by themselves. It is possible to write software and not too difficult to write software that doesn't crash. In its most extreme state, it's called formal verification.

      --
      Mad Software: Rantings on Developing So
    30. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by MrResistor · · Score: 2

      As I understand it, Apple has chosen to design their computers in such a way that a music CD inserted into the CD-ROM drive is capable of hosing the machines firmware. That sure sounds like a faulty product to me.

      In a way, I could understand something like that happening to PCs, since there's a DIY tradition in the PC space. That isn't what Apple sells, particularly with regard to the iMac.

      The IMac is sold as an appliance; something you just plug in and it works, something you never have to think about. For a product like that, firmware should be inaccesible without special tools. A firmware upgrade should be something that you bring it into the shop for. A music CD should not be able to damage the firmware of an appliance. That is piss-poor design on Apples part, and the product is most certainly at fault for being vulnerable to something so inane.

      That said, though, I don't believe Apple should have to pay for the repairs. Sony is the company guilty of malicious cracking here, and needs to be brought to task for their actions, just as would any cracker that distributed a Trojan Horse. That is a federal crime, after all.

      What would be really cool of Apple to do is defer payment for the repairs and join into the burgeoning suits against the responsible record company(s). After all, it does seem like Apple's hardware has been specifically targeted, and it looks like Sony is playing a big part in this particular fiasco, and Sony does compete with Apple in the personal computer market...

      It seems to me that if Apple has the cajones, this could turn into something much more than a simple slap on the wrist of a big record company.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    31. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by Danse · · Score: 2

      I think the point is that it doesn't make any difference what's on the CD. If it's a screwed up CD, then the drive should just refuse to read it. Catastrophic failure such as that described in the article should never be permitted. Someone else used the example of sticking a pizza in the drive, but I say that's just a straw man. Nobody is saying that the drive should function no matter what is inserted. They're saying that if you put a disc that is within the size and shape specs of a CD into a drive, the drive should either read it or not read it. No damage should occur.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    32. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by Hallow · · Score: 2

      The disks that are hosing the firmware are NOT music CD's. They do not confrom to the CD standard, and can't really be called such. So you really can't blame Apple. In fact this may have actually been intentional, to get people pissed off about this copy protection BS.

      Quite frankly, Sony is guilty of Computer Vandalism, and should be charged with the criminal offense for every disk they release that does this, as well as civil suits from individuals with damaged hardware (or perhaps a class action).

    33. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by MrResistor · · Score: 2

      The disks that are hosing the firmware are NOT music CD's

      That is a technicality which in no way invalidates my critism of Apple's design. The firmware of a system sold as an appliance should not be easily modifiable by any mere disk which is inserted into any drive connected to said system. That the disk that actually did the damage was a music CD (or more accurately a disk which was intentionally packaged and marketed in such a way that it would be mistaken for one) simply serves to make the situation that more rediculous.

      I definately agree that Sony should face criminal charges, and I very much hope that Apple has a hand in bringing those forces to bear. Apple has always presented itself as a consumer oriented company, and I think this is an excellent opportunity for them to prove themselves in that arena.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    34. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by ivan256 · · Score: 2

      There isn't really any damage, but it isn't a user escapable senerio. There is no way to manualy eject the disc, and the disc almost works enough to retry unendingly. When you reboot, the drive is too busy trying to figure out what to do with this "almost but not quite a CD" to boot. If there were a physical manual eject button, then there would be no problem.

    35. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by ivan256 · · Score: 2

      Software, drivers in particular, can only be so tolerant. You're relying on this device to boot correctly, so you can only be tolerant of certain types of errors. There are also only so many checks you can do to see if a disc is valid media. If a disc is specifically designed to pass all the possible tests to determine if it's, say, a bootable CD, but then turns out to *not* be a bootable CD, then there's really no automatic way to have prevented the error before knowing of the existance of this new type of disc.

    36. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by vanyel · · Score: 2

      I'm sorry, but a computer that won't eject a piece of plastic the size and shape of a CD is broken by design. From the very first Mac, people have been getting floppies, and later CDs stuck in them. Doesn't Apple *ever* learn? It boggles the mind that they ship products without eject buttons, much less "manual eject holes".

      Not that I let the trojan makers off the hook, but this is clearly an Apple bug.

    37. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by zzyzx · · Score: 2

      See I can't see that the warning is adequate. If you package something that looks just like a cd and it's housed in the cd section, consumers should expect it to play like a cd unless there's a HUGE warning on it.

    38. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      That's another case to take to court, whether the lable is adequate. However, I would much rather see the case of intentional damage to the computer be taken to court.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    39. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by moose_hp · · Score: 1

      I think the point is that it doesn't make any difference what's on the CD. If it's a screwed up CD, then the drive should just refuse to read it.

      I know it is not exactly the same but, if i gave you a cd that had an autorun.ini with exec=misc.exe (or something like that, i havent done that quite a time...) and misc.exe just screw up your machine (hard disk format, bios flashing, virtual memory pages pointing itselves, etc) the cd is not "screwed", just because my program was designed to do this...

      There isnt a way to protect it, its just like viruses and trojans, you cannot protect a machine that run the that process as superuser, you can just check if is already known and stop it...

      --
      DON'T PANIC.
    40. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by WNight · · Score: 2

      Apple's hardware is at fault because it can't handle even simple error conditions such as something that's not a valid CD. What would happen if someone put a failed burn into the drive and it refused to boot or eject the CD properly? Would apple disclaim all responsibility?

      Now, it's also Sony's fault and Apple should probably help consumers sue Sony for intentionally trying to wreak havok on computers.

      This is crap though, with Apple refusing to take responsibility for a broken design.

    41. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by quintessent · · Score: 2

      Software should never crash

      But they also teach you in first year, that software is almost never 100% bug-free.

      So who takes most of the blame? Apple, for somewhere, somehow having a software bug? Or is it the CD manufacturer's fault for putting malicious code on their CD?

    42. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by WNight · · Score: 2

      No matter what garbage, or lack there of, is on a small piece of plastic in the shape of a CD, your firmware shouldn't be damaged.

    43. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by WNight · · Score: 2

      I remember the Vic-20 manual which said basically the same thing. "Unless you're an elephant."

      Yeah, hardware shouldn't be destroyable via software means.

      I've been expecting a new email virus one of these days that'll perform an intentionally bad flash-upgrade of hardware to disable a computer permanently.

      It'd be trivial. Almost all flash upgrades are simple verified with CRCs, which while being good for detecting random corruption, are incredibly easy to spoof intentionaly. (By design.)

      Motherboards, Video cards, CD drives, HDs, Ethernet cards, and more all have flashable BIOSes.

    44. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by Milalwi · · Score: 2


      Software should never crash, no matter what input you put into it. That's taught in every first year programming class I've ever seen, and it goes double for software that controls peripherals.

      Also, please note-- Automobiles should never crash, no matter what happens on the road. That's taught in every first year driver's education course I've ever seen, and it goes double if you are driving an expensive car.

      A better analogy would be:

      Automobiles shouldn't break (i.e., parts fail) no matter what control inputs are given.

      And automobiles pretty much meet this criterion.

      Milalwi
    45. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Software should never crash. But all software crashes, no matter how good, you can crash it eventually. Give it to the right person. Bugger up the config files. Blowtorch the processor, you WILL CRASH eventually.

    46. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Teaching people that software should never crash is tantamount to telling people that everything will be alright and that mummy will kiss it better.

      Anyone who knows anything about computing or mathematics can show you that it is impossible to test even the most simple of computer programmes for every possible input within a time frame of a normal human lifespan.

      In an ideal world software shouldn't crash, but in the real world it is a mathmatical certainty that it will.

  111. Class action lawsuit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would probably be easier to get a class action lawsuit going against Sony.

    Question: does this screw up Sony CD drives? Or Sony computers? If not, then there might be serious grounds for a lawsuit.

  112. Just protecting my rights... by sholton · · Score: 5, Insightful
    So, if I create something that resembles a CD, but really just uses the CD format to carry a harmful digital payload to damage your system, I'm just an artist protecting my rights.

    but...

    If I create something that resembles an email message, but really just uses the email message format to carry a harmful digital payload to damage your system, I'm just an evil hacker who's likely to be spending time in prison.

    Yup. Makes sense to me.

    --
    A new kind of meat designed to appeal to vegetarians.
    1. Re:Just protecting my rights... by Hal-9001 · · Score: 2
      So, if I create something that resembles a CD, but really just uses the CD format to carry a harmful digital payload to damage your system, I'm just an artist protecting my rights.
      Don't blame the artists, it's the intellectual property "owners" who are to blame...
      --
      "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
    2. Re:Just protecting my rights... by Mr.Sharpy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I believe this line of thinking might actually be applicable if you were to write a peice of software that would delete or corrupt data on hardware that it was not explicitly designed for. If you said "This software will not work on any computer except INSERTBRAND computer," then if Sony is not liable for what this cd does why should you be responsible for what your software does when you expressly said it won't work on anything but what you have approved?

      You didn't say "Use of this software on unapproved hardware will eat your data," but Sony didn't put in their disclaimer that you may have to send your computer in for service after trying to use their disc. It seems like it would be like Microsoft selling copies of Windows to OEMs that looks at the BIOS to determine who the manufacturer of the computer is and if it's not the one hard coded into that particular distribution then it flashes over said BIOS. Thus the computer is basically rendered dead, and evil pirating is prevented!

      Then when you sue Microsoft for killing your new motherboard, they will say "Well why were you trying to install 'Windows XP for Dell' on your home built machine?" Hmmm, a shocking concept.

  113. Floppy Drive Firmware by borgasm · · Score: 2, Funny

    I recall something about invalidating the firmware on a floppy drive, in a slightly different manner. I think the trick was to paint the inside of a floppy with nail polish and the powder from inside caps. The drive heats up to read the disk, and in a flash of fire, the floppy drive is no longer functional. Now that's copy protection.

    1. Re:Floppy Drive Firmware by Corby911 · · Score: 1

      Actually, it was match heads I think. Gool ol' Anarchist's Cookbook recipe. Think I've still got that thing around someplace....

      --
      Monday is a horrible way to spend 1/7 of your life.
  114. +1 request for moderation by linzeal · · Score: 0, Troll

    Mod parent up

    1. Re:+1 request for moderation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Moderation Totals: Troll=2, Underrated=1, Total=3.

      Bad moderation strikes again... in the same fscking thread! (or it's the first mismoderator striking again)

  115. Copy protection or marketing coverup? by Tidan · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's not a software trick at all - could be that Celine Dion's voice was causing the computers to crash in the first place. Poor iMac couldn't take it anymore...

    --
    free ipod? yeah.
  116. Send the record companies a clear message... by diggem · · Score: 1

    Go to your local hyper-mart, collect all the CD's you can with warnings about not being able to play in a computer, slap them on the counter and announce loudly that you WON'T be purchasing these CD's because they are complete CRAP.

    If you feel so inclined you might even explain that by stating that your normaly stereo CD player won't play the CD's without it sounding like complete crud etc etc.

    I just think the act of bringing up all those CD's and SHOWING them what you (and probably soon to be many many other people) are NOT going to buy because they have a stupid 'protection' scheme on them that makes them just above worthless... (I mean they still CAN be used as a coaster.)

  117. Big security hole by Animats · · Score: 2
    The fact that this is possible indicates a big security hole. If the Cactus CD protection system can exploit this to alter the firmware, so can other attacks. Now we're going to see viruses that attack firmware.

    How did they do this, anyway? What is the disk doing. This goes beyond having a Windows autorun file and a bad CD directory.

  118. Kewl Hax0r .IsOz??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone know if it would be possible for an evil person to distribute an .iso that did something similar? Totally f*ck up someone's cd-rom?

  119. Re:Oh no! (Aphex Twin) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any group that records images into music . Can't be that bad

  120. Re:Yup, permanent damage; nope, Apple won't cover by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Hey, I actually like this.

    Slashdot geeks can rant and rave all they want about these horrible booby-trapped 'discs', but the outside world must respond for anything to happen- either endorsing the legitimacy of the 'discs' or rejecting it.

    Well, this is a start.

    Playing these things on an iMac means basically voiding the warranty. If, God knows how, the corrupted and intentionally damaging 'disc' manages to actually kill the iMac, Apple says it is your fault for trying to put booby-trapped, intentionally destructive junk in the machine!

    This is a GOOD thing, and I hope other computer manufacturers do likewise. I wouldn't have believed that such a thing could kill an iMac, but note this: iMacs ARE BOOTABLE FROM CD. It seems possible that these 'discs' could contain something like a boot sector, to trick the machine into trying to boot off the 'disc' and then munging its BIOS. Viruses have been able to do stuff like that for years and years- this is simply the first time the RIAA has made a concerted effort to destroy people's computers.

    Apple cannot possibly take responsibility for this. They're doing the right thing- staring in shock, and then quickly announcing, "We will not be held responsible for interoperating with THIS BULLSHIT!"

    I say support Apple for this stance, don't criticise them. Or do you feel that computer manufacturers should now be held responsible for maintaining interoperability with VIRUSES?

  121. My iMac bit the big one just recently..... by Atrax · · Score: 1

    ... perhaps it's this. I don't own any of the CDs on this list though. Perish the thought.

    Actually, I think there's a DVD still stuck in there, but it could possibly be a CD. I can't tell till i crack the bastard open.

    Actually, it's possible the wife got the David Grey album and didn't tell me when the machine wiped ot....

    --
    Screw you all! I'm off to the pub
  122. As evil as this is.. by mindstrm · · Score: 1, Troll

    was the CD *designed* to destroy firmware? In fact, how on earth can it DO that?

    Bad design on the part of the mac.. that's how.

    Let's not put the blame in the wrong place. Copy protected CDs are one thing.. but a mac going braindead because it can't work with the CD? Rediculous.

    1. Re:As evil as this is.. by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      Mac's are standards compliant. When you publish standards and expect everyone to comply with them to promote industry and then go and allow CPCD's which don't have any standards as yet and are not even CDs, tehn you are going to have problems.

      What would you think if this was your car it was affecting and it caused your CD player to burn out and set your car on fire? Bad design from the stereo and car manufaturers, when they have all worked just fine until now?

      It didn't go braindead it simply went into a loop.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
  123. DMCA says it's a felony to fix your Apple ... by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 5, Funny
    In other cases, perhaps you might need to get creative to get that CD out. Perhaps you need to pull the drive apart - who knows.

    Apple knows [apple.com]. You have three non-pull-apart options.

    [options deleted]


    Well, let's see...

    The crud they put on the disk locks up the Apple when you try to play it. Thus...

    This is "technology" that "effectively prevents" unauthorized copying.

    Breaking your computer is part of the correct operation of this technology, so

    Fixing your computer is "circumvention" of "technology" that "effectively prevents" unauthorized copying, a felony under the DMCA, and

    Apple's post telling you how to fix your computer is "trafficing" in circumvention technology, also a felony.

    Quick! Call the FBI! (And ask Adobe for the phone number of the appropriate person to call. B-) )

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:DMCA says it's a felony to fix your Apple ... by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      Somebody moderate this post's parent down, please. I'm sick and tired of all this "DMCA this" and "DMCA that" shit, and I'll bet there are a few mods out there who are, too.

      If you think the DMCA is an important issue, that's fine. But by posting stuff like this-- trying to drag it into a topic to which it simply doesn't apply-- you're just hurting your own cause.

      Hell, right now I'd vote in favor of the DMCA just to annoy Ungrounded Lightning over there!

    2. Re:DMCA says it's a felony to fix your Apple ... by Spaceman+Spiff+II · · Score: 1

      He was obviously being sarcastic, and if I had moderation points right now I'd give them to him (or her..?) +1 funny.

      --
      I understand that life's not fair, just why is it never unfair in my favor?
  124. We hear you brother... by AFreeman · · Score: 2, Funny

    I do have a stereo at home, but not at work...

    ...and all the music I buy is only every played at work (or occasionally in my car) - my girlfriend doesn't like my prediliction for Swedish death metal...(fancy that!), but I won't code to anything else :-)

  125. Note the culprit, folks... by MsGeek · · Score: 3, Informative
    Apple is aware of record companies, including but not limited to Sony, that use such copy protection in new audio disc releases.

    SONY.

    Sony, Sony, Sony.

    Now do you understand why I fsckn can't stand them????

    If there is an Intellectual Property fracas, 9 out of 10 times Sony's right in the middle of it. Burn in Hell, Akio Morita!

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  126. Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always wanted to ruin an iMac with Celine Dion.

  127. Not all labels include labels! by AFreeman · · Score: 1


    On line retailers should make you click through a warning screen before going to your cart...

    Also, I've heard it said that some (smaller) labels in Europe have been distributing copy protected CDs since Christmas, with no warning labels (e.g. Osmose productions).

  128. A good way to kill DMCA? by Jester99 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Are we to understand that post-it notes and sharpie pens are now contraband circumvention devices? 3M is not going to like this, not one bit.

    You know, that just might be the ticket. Is there a way to tell a District Attourney that he should bring suit against somebody for illegal activity? Tip off the DA that 3M is marketting items which may be used as circumvention devices.

    3M will bring in their lawerly guns blazing, and will throw lots of corporate resources at smacking on DMCA; we get our precident by making big business do our fighting for us.

    Can something like this work this way?

    (As a manufacturer of floppy disks, e.g., media which would be forced to have circumvention protection systems built in if CDTBPA (Is that the right 'nym?), etc, are passed, I'm sure that 3M is interested in getting rid of these laws...)

  129. In other news.... by quan74 · · Score: 1

    There's a report over at the NY Times (Free reg, blah blah) announcing that Attorney General John Ashcroft has declared possesion of Sharpie(TM) and Marks A'Lot(TM) permenant markers a felony crime in the United States under the latest anti-terrorism law. He also announced that pending a ruling expected sometime tomorrow Post It(TM) notes and certain colors of dry erase markers may soon be added to the list. When asked for comment Mr. Ashcroft said "All your I-Mac are belong to us!" and declined making any further statements.

  130. Maybe not all of them have protection... by MoogMan · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine did indeed back up a said cd onto his hard drive and has no problems whatsoever in doing so. It was marked on the cd that it was copy-protected, but the protection was not apparent when attempting to back up the disk.
    Maybe not all of the cds include the copy protection they say, or maybe there are some cd writers that are not effected by the protection?

  131. But a LOT of people DO have fucking stereos by forkboy · · Score: 1

    You may not own a TV or stereo, preferring to watch movies and listen to music on your PC, but the vast, vast majority of people would prefer to watch television on a decent sized screen and listen to music on a decent set of speakers. Being someone who owns a nice stereo system and a fairly good TV, I have to say that entertainment media like DVDs and CDs on the PC don't even compare. Especially when we have guests over or are having a party....ever try to cram 10 people around a computer to watch a movie?

    I'm not agreeing with their flagrant abuse of standards, mind you, I'm just letting you know that there's no dark conspiracy against you....people really do buy TVs and stereos because they prefer them to computerized entertainment.

    --
    This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
    1. Re:But a LOT of people DO have fucking stereos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Especially when we have guests over or are having a party....ever try to cram 10 people around a computer to watch a movie?

      No, but at the parties I've been to (and thrown), my laptop makes a damned cool DVD/Videogame system. You may not cram 10 people around a monitor, but with a video-out and a USB hub, you make a darned fine portable videogaming system with any recent laptop. (NHL2001 is best experienced with 7 people all controlling a character and yelling at each other)

      It also makes one of the best movie players, since my friends don't own a DVD player, and I have a nice mix of DVDs and VCDs to offer.

      And on top of that, when party is over, I plug it into my car and have a CD/MP3 player on the way home.

      Now try all that with seperate components, each designed to "look" as big as every other piece of stereo equipment in the average home, and lug it around.

    2. Re:But a LOT of people DO have fucking stereos by forkboy · · Score: 1

      I never said that the component stuff was portable. And you're video-outing to what...lemme guess, a tv?

      And when you're on the way home, it's plugged into a car audio system....a far cry from PC speakers.

      And your average TV and home theater setup prolly costs less than a really good laptop, unless you're buying top of the line.

      PC multimedia has its place....I like MP3s and downloaded eps of Family Guy and all, but I wouldn't trade my home setup for anything.

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
    3. Re:But a LOT of people DO have fucking stereos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point is, someone who doesn't have a stereo now has no other choice than to download mp3s if they wish to listen to the music...

      Reportedly, some copy protection schemes also prevent the CDs from being played on DVD-players. I play CDs on my DVD-player (which sends the audio data to my amp in digital) and I don't want to buy a separate CD player just to be able to listen to CDs. It would be expensive if I wanted it to have a digital output and it wouldn't fit in my current home theater equipment rack!

    4. Re:But a LOT of people DO have fucking stereos by jx100 · · Score: 1

      I've never seen a stereo that could fuck...

    5. Re:But a LOT of people DO have fucking stereos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > decent set of speakers
      Uhm, I got my jmlab speakers connected to my NAD which is connected to my computer, I fail to see how that would make them less decent..

      >CDs on the PC don't even compare
      You're right, the bits in a PC will not get scratched over time, I can remix songs to suite my speakers. CDs copied to a PC in lossless format is superior.

      It sounds like you do not care about quality, but about being cool with your friends.

      > people really do buy TVs and stereos because they prefer them to computerized entertainment.

      Perhaps people prefer this and that, but the fact remains that what most people buy is low quality, replica shit. They buy music, not even written by the musicans, they buy shoes that wont stick together a year, and so on.

      >no dark conspiracy against you
      Perhaps not against me, but against the hords working like slaves. What do they get? Cheap shit?
      That's an evil conspiracy if you ask me.

    6. Re:But a LOT of people DO have fucking stereos by Junta · · Score: 2

      Ok, I admit I have a stereo receiver, and am looking to get either a large projection TV or a projector, and a VCR to tune TV and play tapes. Everything else I do through the computer connected through the stereo. Progressive scan DVD playback, CD playback, but more frequently rip the cds to disk so I can have instant access to all tracks on all CDs without suffering the wait of a CD changer to change discs, and without having to worry about the crap tracks. So the "typical parts" include stereo, because it sounds so damn good, TV, though not really typical, since I plan on getting something that takes XGA input from a computer, and a VCR, because TV tuner through computer through TV looks like crap and I need something to play all those damn tapes. When I can get away with it, the computer offers great quality and flexibility. I don't feel like having my rig castrated just because the RIAA/MPAA is afraid I *could* do something bad with it. Hell, I *have* to use linux in my rig because some of my non-CSS, non-Region coded discs refuse to play under any of my Windows applications, so I have to use illegal software to
      have my rig work right (technically I could avoid the CSS bits and boot between Windows and linux, but that is too much to expect).

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    7. Re:But a LOT of people DO have fucking stereos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm, I got my jmlab speakers connected to my NAD

      You have speakers connected to your nads? Eeeeeww!

  132. +1 request for moderation: no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sorry but no, it's already at +4

  133. The computer knows... by NoFX · · Score: 1

    Its not copy protection folks... the computer is just smart enough to know it doesn't want to play Celine Dion... It's actually Sanity-Protection on the hardware side!!

    Support Indie labels...

  134. The other way around by ricecrazy · · Score: 1

    Now, if Apple could only come up with an iMac that renders all Celine Dion CDs unplayable...

  135. just don't buy it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So - you not only should NOT buy it, but you should write a letter to the producer saying you don't buy products that won't work with your iMac. And if everyone did that, then they might realize their stupidity.

  136. Didn't the original post say you CAN'T reboot? by VEGx · · Score: 1

    All these three options require rebooting. However, the original post said that this CD by artist of little talent makes your computer unable to reboot!?!?!?!

    1. Re:Didn't the original post say you CAN'T reboot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      • Some macintoshes have a hardware reset button on the front.
      • Failing that... you unplug the machine and turn it on again!! Shitty, huh? But it works.. unplugging will always work :)
    2. Re:Didn't the original post say you CAN'T reboot? by foobar104 · · Score: 3, Informative

      All these three options require rebooting. However, the original post said that this CD by artist of little talent makes your computer unable to reboot!?!?!?!

      The MacUser UK article that inspired this thread is simply terrible. And yeah, it said that the CDs in question would leave the Mac unable to boot. But what was meant was that the Mac would be unable to boot all the way up to multiuser mode successfully.

      In order to force-eject the CD-- using two out of the three methods, that is-- you only have to get the Mac up to Open Firmware. That's all in hardware, so the presence of a bad disc won't affect it.

      Seems like most people don't even know that they've got a really sophisticated boot PROM underneath their Macs. Hold down cmd-opt-O-F (that's "oh" and "eff") right after powering on some time to see how it all works.

  137. Technical document translation by rjamestaylor · · Score: 5, Funny
    • They find the line distant up to two centimeters from the outside edge. Draw now with the pin a tangential line, which covers the dividing line accurately, into which outside range project, but does not affect the last audio TRACK. A sticking tire helps as ruler.

      Try the result out. If it did not fold, the line covers either the dividing line not completely or lies over the last audio trace - here geht's around tenths of a millimeter. Then you wipe away to the pro copying bars with a damp speed and correct after.

    I followed these directions and my Celine Dion disk is now stuck in a tire heading east on I-10 at about 75 mph. I feel better already.
    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  138. Can they make the warning stickers big enough ... by gotan · · Score: 2

    ... to prevent them being sued to hell and back? If that happened to me i would sure take it out of their hide and rise a big fuss about it too. Especially in the US of A, where McDonalds has to print "Dangerous: hot beverage" or somesuch on their coffe cups, i'd expect they'll have to make the warning stickers larger than the CD-cover.

    Maybe someone can think of a way to make them pay really large for damages (put some important documents on that iMac, claim it was the only copy, and you needed it just that day ...) i'd relly like to see the creators of that copyprotection bleed over this. Also i think this should make for a really nasty press story: before it was just some abstract copyprotection that would make one or the other CD not play, but now it's about destroying ones propertywhen attempting to play the CD.

    --
    "By the way if anyone here is in advertising or marketing... kill yourself." -- Bill Hicks
  139. Which one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Or you can hold down the mouse button, which will eject all removable media on reboot (Same for all Macs). "

    Which button, the left of the riiiii.....oops, never mind.

  140. No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MMhm.

    And what do you do once it is impossible to get a cd that isn't copy-protected? If they get away with this with a celene dion cd, they will NOT stop there.

    What if music is your life, and you really aren't satisfied listening only to mail-order music recorded in people's bedrooms and burned onto CD-Rs, and the music from the independent record label Negativland owns?

    It is NOT "that simply". You're saying that if i'm about to have my most beloved form of art fucked up by a huge, soulless corporation, then the only thing i can do is just stop listening to music? You're saying that even though i know even though i buy thousands of dollars of music a year, *even if i stop buying cds forever, this will not impact them enough for them to notice or change their policies because of me?*

    Something is NOT RIGHT when your only possible response to something *one* organization decides is to boycott an entire industry.

    I'm not going to just "don't buy the damn cds". i'm going to yell, scream, whine, try to create political trouble for the label, and then if they persist steal their music and try to propigate it on p2p networks as much as possible.

    One man agitating is just a drop in the bucket for them, but it's a hell of a lot more of a noticeable drop in said bucket than just if the cds i normally buy in a year are taken off the resume sheets of the RIAA's vendors.

    Super ugly ultraman

  141. Does that mean black markers are forbidden now? by gotan · · Score: 3, Funny

    I mean, they can be used as circumvention devices to copy protected digital content, so the DMCA should apply, no?

    --
    "By the way if anyone here is in advertising or marketing... kill yourself." -- Bill Hicks
  142. Conirmation? by FreeMars · · Score: 1

    Does anyone live near a superstore which sells Macs and non-CDs?

    --
    Email: slashdot3@FreeMars.org (Address will be abandoned when it gets spam.)
  143. my god... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why, oh WHY would ANYONE want to buy a Celine Dion CD? Come on people, even the pop chick of the day (according to the top 40 schlock) has more talent than this horse faced, whiny voiced bitch!

  144. Virus by pixelcort · · Score: 1

    Isn't this like a computer virus? Software that causes damage? I thought that was illegal.

    --
    http://pixelcort.com/
  145. So don't buy crap CDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simply steal them as I do. Sooner or later, if enough people are bootlegging CDs then crap artists who should really return to the hell from whence they came and are only in this for the money will stop making their torturous "music". Problem solved, though I would prefer to settle this one with Celine DeCunt herself in a backyard firewood match on pay per view. Fucking Canadians, first you give us Rush to get our hopes up and now we must endure your most horrific export to date. You should be ashamed of yourselves. Eh.

  146. Why get a CD when glue works just as well? by xactoguy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why go to all the trouble of going out, buying a CD (Celine Dion *shudder*), and putting it in my iMac? I might as well walk over to my desk, get some glue, and pour it in there :D. It'll do just the same thing, be cheaper for me, PLUS I'm sure that I will get some nice sound effects/smells being produced :D. Seriously, though, why does Sony have to be doing this? How can we send them some sort of message that they are screwing themselves over by doing this?

    --


    And so we go, on with our lives
    We know the truth, but prefer lies
    Lies are simple, simple is bliss
  147. Dude, forget computer stores. by mcc · · Score: 2
    Here's a much better idea. Go out and buy one of these CDs. Take it back into the music store. Try to return it. While it's still in the macintosh.

    I mean, specifically, what i really, really want to do is this: go down to Wherehouse music tomorrow and buy the Celene Dion CD, come back home, put the CD in my quicksilver g4 and fubar it.. then go back to Wherehouse carrying the g4, and whine and panic that their cd broke my computer.. and then whomp the empty cd case and the fubared g4 on their customer service counter and demand that they accept the return. And that they get their merchandise out of my computer.

    Wouldn't it be great to see the looks on their faces??? :)

    Then I could do it at Sam Goody the next day.

    Of course, *i* know that it's easy to solve, and that all you have to do is start up the macintosh with the mouse button held down, and it will eject the cd and you can get on with their life. And i *could* just do that for them. But hey, they broke it. Let them fix it :)

    There will be thousands of clueless newbies who will buy that cd and break their computers with it, and *THEY* will be totally unable to do anything about it (since Apple won't provide phone support AT ALL unless you pay them lots of money, and so the only way to find out about the magic mouse button eject thing is to read the document on Apple's website that explains what to do.. and *how do you read Apple's website if your Macintosh is broken*?).. so.

    If Wherehouse music is going to be selling this CD to people whose computers will break as a result, and Wherehouse music isn't going to be there to help explain to them how to restore their imacs to working order.. why should i explain to Wherehouse music how to restore my mac to working order when it's sitting on their counter in front of an underpaid clerk while i hold up the line?? ^_^ I have this vision of this happening all over the country, hundreds of secretly-clued-in mac owners sabotaging their machines and then going back to make music stores actually deal with the fallout of what they've done, instead of making the consumer deal with the fallout.. but of course that won't happen. Of course i won't even get around to doing it myself, because i don't get around to finishing things often and i fucking hate Celene Dion. But it's fun to think about :)
    Anyway, for the record, it isn't that your "firmware" gets messed up like the Slashdot blurb says.. I know, because i've had this exact problem happen to me. Not with a copy-protected CD-- i apparently managed to replicate the macintosh-fubaring effects of the Cactus technology totally independently, in my dorm room, by getting my copy of "Confield" (Autechre's newest album, buy it today! ^_^) all scratched up and then spilling stuff on it. I got the same effect the apple article describes, and basically what happens is this: there's a flaw in the current macintosh CD-ROM drives where if you put in a sufficiently damaged CD, the computer gets so confused that upon trying to read the CD, it crashes. Unfortunately, with the newer macintoshes there's no way to eject the CD except by software unless you disassemble the machine.. and this is a problem because in the Macintosh boot sequence, the first thing the Macintosh does is read some data off the CD-ROM drive to see if the CD-ROM is bootable... which, with one of the copy-protected CDs, of course causes the Mac to crash again. The cycle can be broken by doing what this post says.. in my case, the mouse-button-at-startup thing worked. But only after I walked to a school computer lab and hounded people on IRC until i found someone who knew how to make a macintosh g4 eject the CD on startup.. :P
  148. CD or not a CD.. by XMode · · Score: 1

    I was wondering the same thing. If the discs don't have the CD logo how are they being sold as CDs and if they DO have the logo can they be sued for misrepresentation of their product?

  149. Hey! CD (clone) manfactures! by Tsunami_In_My_Head · · Score: 1

    Yeah, do what you want, I'll see you in hell. NEver buying a fucking cd or whatever the fuck they are selling now again, you hear that?

  150. No problem. by ZigMonty · · Score: 2
    Dude you can always reboot a mac. In increasing order of desperation:
    1. Apple Menu->Restart
    2. Command-Ctrl-Power
    3. Reset button (if you have one)
    4. Yank the power cable/battery out.

    Done.

  151. This CD is copywrited... You have 10 seconds.... by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    I love how the destruction of the customers personal property in the name of copywrite laws just became envogue, even if you're not a pirate. Never have I seen a better case of "we don't need no stinkin' customers". Heck, even the military tests their weapons on inert targets before actually deploying them....

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  152. amazon.com says it's an audio cd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just did a quick search for the Celine Dion CD on Amazon.com. They list it as an audio CD. Looks to me like you can buy it, try it out, and return it when it fucks up your computer (sue?) because it is mislabled as being a Compact Disc.

    Of course, Celine Dion is just used as an example. Please purchase decent music.

  153. The CD did it? by Andronicus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The CD could not "fubar the firmware." However, it could bring out a bug in that firmware that leads to its own state of fubar.

    I hate copyprotected CDs. But the fubar'ed iMac CD drive firmware needs to be addressed by Apple.

    --
    USNG: 14TPU4605
  154. paperclip guy? by Pierre · · Score: 1

    Finally that annoying office assistant has a purpose. How do you start up office if you can't get the machine to boot though?

  155. Slashdot's All Time Greatest Hits by Kashif+Shaikh · · Score: 1


    MW3 - Mommy, Why Won't it Work?
    RCD - Record Companies Downfall
    18POS - $18 Piece Of Sh*t
    SLS - Sony's Last Stand


    These would be potential track songs...heck it could be part of Slashdot's All Time Greatest Hits Volume1.

    Anyone want to add more tracks before its finalized?

  156. And remember, kids... by Millennium · · Score: 3, Funny

    Every time you listen to a copy-protected CD...
    Celine Dion kills an iMac.
    Please, think of the iMacs.

  157. Sony are hypocrites by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 2

    Think about this for a moment -- on the one hand we have Sony (and other recording companies) telling us that we shouldn't be copying music and burning CDRs.

    On the other hand, Sony are more than happy to take our money when we buy one of their CDR/RW drives, their CDR/RW media and their various audio recording products.

    Should they sue themselves under the DMCA I wonder?

    Or are they just so stupid that they're hoping nobody will notice this crazy situation?

  158. It's not, it's Pioneer's by Chirs · · Score: 3, Insightful


    Apple really isn't to blame, except maybe for buying drives with poorly written firmware.

    The drive manufacturer is at fault here--it should not be possible to cause damage by inserting a disk in the drive. Really, the copy protection is only a disk that is corrupted in a specific way--the drive should have been designed to fail gracefully if the disk is corrupted.

    1. Re:It's not, it's Pioneer's by lunky · · Score: 1

      >Apple really isn't to blame, except maybe for buying drives with poorly written firmware.
      ....but I didn't buy a "Pioneer" I bought a MAC!...or so the argument goes, I don't care who MADE it, who inspected it, who goofed in the design of these things or who cleaned them before they left the factory.....
      Apple really is to blame for buying drives with poorly written firmware. Your computer should not be held hostage by a funny looking circular thing stuck in a CD player.
      I don't think Apple has to put a sticker telling people not to put things that don't say "CD" on them in their CD players, but I don't think I'd be too happy with Apple if I did.

      --
      lunky> c++; lunky> do{;}
  159. Re:Oh no! (Aphex Twin) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    aphex twin rules EVEN if you don't like electronic music

    pff, geeks...

  160. Hypothetical Celine lovers... by theMightyE · · Score: 1

    OK, suppose I really love Celine (yeah, yeah, it's a big hypothetical, I know) and am willing to forgive her for being willing to trash my computer just by playing her crappy music. It would seem that all I'd have to do is put her CD-like-thing into a normal player, connect the output cable to the microphone input of my computer and hit play to digitize an analog version of her disc via my system's input port, now sans the iMac destructo ray. Once this is done, just upload the file somewhere and share it with everyone else. I don't mean to make apologies for the Special Olympians who came up with this scheme, and I'm sure the odd snobbish audiophile will complain that only 99.999% of the audio quality is conserved this way, but the point is that it'd be so easy to defeat any semi-CD encoding scheme with this method that mebbe they'll figure it out and just give up. Celine for the masses! What can I say, I must just have a thing for bony Canadian divas. theMightyE

  161. Many conflicts of interest... by Xepherys2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I see many conflicts of interest here...

    First of all, Sony begins using this copy-protection scheme by forcing it's children-companies to begin putting it on their "CD"s. This is apparently an attempt to prevent ripping of said "CD" tracks into MP3 or other digital media files. On the other hand, Sony is one of the larger companies who are currently making hardware to play "legitimate" MP3s, such as the Sony MP505 mini-disc MP3 players, and others.

    Now, how does one go about using their Sony MP505 to play MP3s from their new Sony-parented "CD"? I mean, I understand that the MP3 players are just to jump into a market where money is to be had, but still, this seems like a case of one hand not knowing what the other is doing.

    First of all, as has been stated many-a-time, the patent holder of TRUE CDs should sue the pants off of companies that are creating discs that do not conform to standards, but still market them as CDs. Perhaps the official CD logo is not there on many of these CDs, but do the record labels make any statement that these are not truly Compact Discs?

    What other devices might these not work in? Some items made for the computer-oriented user that has a more CD-ROM style interface than a standard CD interface? What about MP3 players that use CD media to play MP3s, but also can play audio CDs? What about a device like my Apex AD-3201. that uses a very standard DVD-ROM drive attached via an ATAPI interface to a decoder? If not these discs, will others that are soon to follow cause problems here as well?

    Perhaps I am not technically inclined enough with color book standards to understand what causes the current problems in iMacs, and why there may not be other problems here and there... but I know enough to be mildly concerned about this.

    If someday I purchase Star Wars Episode II on DVD and pop it into my Apex (with region encoding and Macrovision turned off), and my DVD and mainboard firmware become damaged... I'm going to be particularly upset.

    Does anyone have a webpage up yet that lists not only known discs with this protection, but also known devices, SPECIFICALLY, which will fail and how? Just curious if maybe the full impact has not yet been felt or noticed.

    -Xepherys

    1. Re:Many conflicts of interest... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      First of all, as has been stated many-a-time, the patent holder of TRUE CDs should sue the pants off of companies that are creating discs that do not conform to standards, but still market them as CDs.

      Unfortunately, the appropriate patent holders are Philips and...Sony. (Philips has said that these non-CDs should not use the "Compact Disc -- Digital Audio" logo.)

      TSG

    2. Re:Many conflicts of interest... by DrDave · · Score: 0

      Sony and Philips own the patents for CD's. I don't think Sony will sue themselves, but they might make a CD-ROM drive that will play copy protected CDs on computers.

      --
      Is this a rhetorical question?
    3. Re:Many conflicts of interest... by Geraden · · Score: 1

      Actions like these are just begging for class-action lawsuits. The fact that they not only don't play (which is fraud in and of itself), but seemingly intentionally damage equipment smacks of harmful intent. They can't say that they didn't know about the problems -- it states right on the cover that it won't play in Macs....

      Grrrr.....

      Companies like this really cheese me off.

    4. Re:Many conflicts of interest... by Will_TA · · Score: 1

      They may hold the patents, but who does the standard belong to? The website http://www.ee.washington.edu/conselec/CE/kuhn/cdro m/95x8.htm may prove of interest to readers, which contains the CD-Audio Standard. Since these Copy Protected CDs do not conform to these standards, It would seem that to discribe them as Audio CD's would be misleading, and, certainly, in the UK, Illegal.

  162. What would a flock of penguins do? by corebreech · · Score: 2

    Peck them to death!

    Everybody should just take Sony to small claims court!

    Bring your fucked-up iMac -- or buy an iMac and have it fucked up by Sony first -- and bring the iMac to small claims court, asking for Sony to fix your iMac.

    If everybody did this, what would Sony do? Deploy a lawyer to every one-horse town in America defending these claims?

    If they did, the cost would be exorbitant beyond belief! If they didn't, the cost would be exorbitant beyond belief!

    Think small beaks. Biting hard. Lots of them.

    1. Re:What would a flock of penguins do? by Xepherys2 · · Score: 1

      I don't believe that small claims court can make judgements against the cost of a computer... even an iMac. I believe, at least in Michigan, small claims courts are limited to settlements of ~$500-1000.

      Though I could be terribly mistaken as well...

      -Xeph

    2. Re:What would a flock of penguins do? by wolf- · · Score: 1

      Depends on the court.
      Some courts will allow up to $10,000 in small claims..

      --
      ----- LoboSoft specializes in Digital Language Lab
  163. Store Displays by Crus57 · · Score: 1

    So, working on the assumption that these are not in fact CDs, will stores have to create a new section outside of their Music CD section to display them in?

    If they don't, is it false advertising?

  164. if u step on my private property... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i have a sign on my house yard outer periphery which says, "private property, keep out". now if u step one feet on my property, i will kill u. anything wrong with it?

  165. Celine Dion hurts by racerx509 · · Score: 1

    Celine Dion CD damages my Imac? I'm more worried about it damaging my hearing.

    --
    13 year old white supremacists are shitty web designers.
  166. Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was looking at the cd's that I have purchased a few years ago. I can't find the compact disc logo on the cd case, just on the cd itself. Where on the cd case does the "compact disc digital audio" usually appear? I only buy the cd's that I really want, and well if I'm going to spend $16 it better f$&%#@g work in my PC-DVD drive.

  167. this is why i only buy LPs by type40 · · Score: 1


    I would like to know what effect these "protected" CDs would have on older ROM based Power Macs like mine. (it's a ROM the there's no way to mess with it, example, why you can't change the start-up chime on old Macs.)

    beings that I only buy LPs (yes they still make them, yes they do sound better, and yes they do last longer) and burn them to CDR I have no way or desire (to buy a CD by that talentless hack) to test this.

    --
    "You can see I know very little about pimp policy." George McGovern.
  168. Only in UK/Euro? by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

    www.amazon.co.uk has this warning:
    This CD includes anti-copying technology that is intended to prevent unlawful copying of the CD with a PC. This may affect playability of the CD on certain computer devices such as PCs and gaming platforms.

    This warning is absent at www.amazon.com

    "...may affect..." Nothing about anything more hazardous wrt to iMacs. They do, however, specifically call it a CD.

    If it looks like a duck....it damn well better BE a duck.

    1. Re:Only in UK/Euro? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about technology to allow lawful copying?

      Oh, you mean that was there in the standard, and they deliberately broke it?

      NO SALE.

  169. Bumper Stickers by uberdave · · Score: 1

    Man, I should get one of those bumper stickers for my van... The moving one... The one about moving.

  170. "The Eminem Show" might be copy-protected by burgburgburg · · Score: 1
    On May 1, I submitted the story that Universal Music was in negotiations with Eminem and Interscope, his label, to convince him to release his new, highly anticipated album, "The Eminem Show" with copy-protection.

    Any decision will have to have been made by around 05/14/02 for the album to be pressed and in stores by June 3, the expected release date.

    I felt this foreknowledge would allow us to inform Eminem, Interscope, and Universal/Vivendi's how wrong this would be. Too late. We'll just get to complain about it after the fact.

    The article about it: http://news.com.com/2100-1023-896391.html.

  171. Beast Buy has nothing on Fry's... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Beast Buy's rejects wind up there...

  172. Apple.com addressed this.... sorta... by johnpaul191 · · Score: 1

    Apple info page on the topic:
    http://kbase.info.apple.com/cgi-bin/WebObjects/kba se.woa/wa/query?searchMode=Expert&type=id&val=KC.1 06882

    MacSlash reported it here (users comments too):
    http://www.macslash.com/articles/02/05/10/239216.s html


    there are some of those nifty Mac tricks to make the CD Rom tray open on restart and whatnot, so not all hope is lost if there is no manual eject hole. It sucks these major label scumbags are selling these things that technically are not audio CDs.... they do not stick to the standards. JERKS!

  173. I guess there's some truth in everything by bsdbigot · · Score: 1

    Anyone remember about 10-12 years ago when a rumor was going around that coating the edge of a CD with a green marker would make it play (sound) better? Interesting, this. Almost makes me wish I was more gullible, but I still can't bring myself to purposefully mar my collection... These damned CDs are just too expensive to risk destroying them just so I can play them in my PC.

    --
    main(){char I,l,O[]={'-',1-1,0,(1<<5)-1,0+'-',-10-1,-10,11-0,- 1,-100};for(I=l=0;l<10+0;put
  174. any lawsuits? by Tom · · Score: 2

    I thought you americans would always sue everyone over pretty much everything - so where's the lawsuit? I'm fairly sure that over here in europe, where we still have some consumer protection laws, this CD would violate at least half of them (let's see - misleading advertisement, sale of known defective stuff, intent to damage private property...)

    A class-action lawsuit (not possible in europe) could make you rich. Just claim the total sales volume of iMacs as the damage and sue on behalf of all iMac owners (it may or may not help to be one).

    More seriously, why isn't there a lawsuit? Are corporations the only ones with a license to abuse the courts?

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  175. Hello Good Times virus... by xixax · · Score: 2
    Oh great, $BIGCORP has just spent an obscene amount of cash implementing the GOOD TIMES virus. The stupidity of it all leaves me lost for words. I shall await the urban folklore with relish:

    Thought you might like to know...

    Apparently , a new computer virus has been engineered by RIAA that is unparalleled in its destructive capability. Other, more well-known viruses such as Stoned, Airwolf, and Michaelangelo pale in comparison to the prospects of this newest creation by a warped mentality.

    What makes this virus so terrifying is the fact that no program needs to be exchanged for a new computer to be infected. It can be spread through the existing retail systems.

    Luckily, there is one sure means of detecting what is now known as the "Celine Dion" virus. It always travels to new computers the same way - in a CD titled simply "Celine Dion". Avoiding infection is easy once the CD has been received - by not using it. The act of using the CD in your computer causes the "Celine Dion" mainline program to initialize and execute. It will then proceed to trash the computer it is running on.

    The bottom line here is - if you receive a CD title "Celine Dion", delete it immediately! Do not use it! Rest assured that whoever's istening to this CD is surely struck by the virus. Warn your friends and local system users of this newest threat to the InterNet! It could save them a lot of time and money.

    Xix.

    --
    "Everything is adjustable, provided you have the right tools"
  176. Not new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This page is from August 8, 2001:
    http://www.cdprot.cjb.net/
    It describes the same principle.

  177. fun with large electronics stores by cosyne · · Score: 2

    This sounds like great fun in places that sell macs and CDs. Just sneak a celene dion disk from the music section over the the computer section and drop it in a new imac. Not that i condone evil acts like this, i'm just saying it sounds fun.

    BTW- if you are opening CDs in a store and don't intend to buy them, leave the sticker seal on the top edge and just unhinge the jewel case to get the CD out. That way you can put them back still 'sealed.'

    I just had another thought- if i did a bit-for-bit copy of the malicious part of the cd and then distributed that to mess up cd drives, would i be a malicious hacker?

  178. Neato. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, this is great. I was just about to order the Episode II CD from Amazon.com, but since this has the same copy protection BS, I'm downloading the MP3's instead. Fuck them.

    I want to play it on my computer since that's the *only* place I ever listen to music. And if they aren't going to let me, I'll find another way to do it. Good thing they just lost my $18, I'd rather spend it on something else anyway.

  179. WTF? You can eject a CD without power... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know that little tiny hole in your CD-ROM that doesn't do anything? It looks sort of like it might have an LED in it but doesn't? Guess what happens when you stick a paperclip in there...

    In other news, power outage prevents computers from playing music CDs or even booting.
    Clueless iMac users whine like little bitches: "This should be covered under warranty!"

    1. Re:WTF? You can eject a CD without power... by Kredal · · Score: 1

      Some new macs don't have that little hole, and you have to go into the firmware (apple-control-o-f makes ctrl-alt-del look easy) and "eject cd".

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
  180. Thank you for listening ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your CD drive will self destruct in 5 seconds.

  181. if it's not a CD, how can I play it? by slaida1 · · Score: 1
    ..since I don't have other than CD players wich could take and spin something that's shaped just like a CD.

    If it's a CD, then you're supposed to find it from a store under the label "audio CDs", if it's not, then is the store owner liable for selling dynamites that look like a cigars from the cigar stand? It seems like we need at least different stands in stores for "mostly playable discs that resemble CDs but are not"

    --
    Preserve old classics: copy your collection onto all hard drives.
    1. Re:if it's not a CD, how can I play it? by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      If it's a CD, then you're supposed to find it from a store under the label "audio CDs", if it's not, then is the store owner liable for selling dynamites that look like a cigars from the cigar stand?

      Like I said to JoeSchmoe, please don't use the word "liable" in this context. It implies a specific level of legal responsibility that just doesn't apply here.

      If you buy a CD and it doesn't play, take it back to the store. If the store won't accept the return, sell the CD at a used record store to recoup some of your expense, then find a new place to buy CDs.

      This same algorithm applies in cases where you might buy one of these pseudo-CDs.

      In fact, if you really feel like spending a little time and money to vote against these things, you should go to a record store and buy a copy of one of them. Take it home and open it. Stare at it for a while. Heck, you can even try to listen to it, just don't use a computer to do it. Then haul the disc and your receipt back to the store and-- politely, politely!-- ask for your money back.

      If the average CD run has one defect in 10,000 discs (a totally made-up number) but these CDs all have rates of return greatly in excess of that, somebody will get the message. I hope.

  182. Sluggy Freelance by Antarius · · Score: 1

    Of course, the Prophet Peter Abrams knew all about this in 1997. http://www.sluggy.com/daily.php?date=970829 (Or read from http://www.sluggy.com/daily.php?date=970825 for the fully story - only 3 more strips!)

  183. MOD. THIS. UP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Subject line says it all.

  184. The Whore cost me 500 dollars. by Wastedlife.com · · Score: 1

    I am interested to hear of more Celine Dion contraversy on slashdot. Many of you readers might consider this off topic, but I would like to discuss what happened when I inserted my recently purchased Celine cd. Nothing abnormal. The machine played it and CDDB even got the track listing for it. It played perfectly. The downside is that I used my debt card to buy (aka experiment with) this disc -- and in doing so overdrafted my bank account. I was unaware of me going into the red (i am a poor broke college student) and ended up nearly $500 dollars in the hole because of this horrible cd. Pfft, and the RIAA wants to know why I dont buy cd's -- :)

  185. Old news.. by joonasl · · Score: 1
    This is just additional proof to what most people knew allready:

    Celine Dion considered harmfull

    --
    "There is a terrorist behind every bush"
  186. Um, no. by acb · · Score: 2

    Celine Dion fans would most probably be people who don't care (or know) what their computer runs; which means mostly Windows users.

    Since Windows is the default OS, Windows users' tastes would be (on average) more mainstream than fringe users. Mac users would probably have more piercings/tattoos than the average person and would be likely to listen to eclectic bands most people have never heard of.

    1. Re:Um, no. by CoolVibe · · Score: 2
      Lessee.. I own a Mac (an iMac even)...

      Tattooed? Uhm... yes...

      Pierced? Yup, that too...

      Eclectic music? Well, if Industrial and Metal counts... yes...

      BTW, I have no linux boxen, only old crummy sparcstations (of which one is a dual head) running Solaris and some Free/NetBSD boxen... And of course my iMac running OSX.

      Well you came close enough :)

  187. Is there a warning on the CD itself? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And if so, is it just a notice that you may not read?

    What if it's some huge "poison" sign? Maybe it's some band like Biohazard (or Poison :-)).

    Used disks may not come with the leaflet or original jewel box.

    What if you're having a party or checking out the CDs your friend brought in some CD bag?

    1. Re:Is there a warning on the CD itself? by ringbarer · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Used disks may not come with the leaflet or original jewel box.

      You mean you'd DARE buy a used disk??? That should be illegal. Clearly you're a pirate, communist or terrorist, at least if the RIAA had their way.

      It's sad that they assume the consumer is a criminal. And it's only going to get worse.

      --
      "Why did they cancel my favorite Sci-Fi show? I downloaded ALL the episodes!"
  188. Does any responsiblity lie with the retailers??? by msaulters · · Score: 3, Insightful

    With all this talk about how these CD's are not "CD"'s, it strikes me that a store selling them couldn't properly call itself a "CD" store. I think, perhaps retailers should separate these from the other, proper, CDDA discs.

    A warning on the packaging and on the disc itself is insufficient for two reasons that I can see: 1) It would NEVER occur to the average consumer (who's only just figured out that thing isn't a cup-holder) that not only is a CD not a CD, but that it could 'break' their computer. Yes, I've seen the explanations that the hardware isn't really broken, but we ALL know that the average user isn't technically aware, and things must be kept VERY simple.

    Reason #2) The packaging is not always available. I just hopped over to CDNOW, and there is NO MENTION WHATSOEVER on the page to indicate this is not a CDDA disc. It is listed in two formats: CD and Tape (and the CD is still more expensive than cassette, go figure)

    Knowing that retailers are extremely unlikely to provide this service any time soon, may I humbly propose we create a CDNOT.com to catalog all these unplayable discs, and make a plugin available that will warn you, should you attempt to purchase one?

    --
    These people looked deep into my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined.
  189. shoot the mom by Herr_Nightingale · · Score: 1

    My condolences.

    It's too bad that there are people out there willing to support the media moguls even when they do sh*t like this ... making those damned Celine Dion discs oughtta be agin' tha law.
    Breaking iMacs is kinda bad too i guess.

  190. SW2 Soundtrack in Switzerland also protected. by Erik_ · · Score: 1

    I purchased it yesterday in Zurich, Switzerland and it also contains the protection. I was able to listen to it on my laptop by only adding a small piece of scotch on the outer layer of the disc.

  191. Clearly too late on this thread, but... by seldolivaw · · Score: 2

    A friend of mine bought that CD. It plays (and rips) fine in my computer -- even on Window Media Player, for pete's sake -- except for the last track, which won't rip or play. I dunno how effective you call that...

  192. All 3 mac users by TheAcousticMotrbiker · · Score: 1

    The hold-down-the-button trick is very well known among Mac users, and all three of them are documented thoroughly.

    So, basically you're saying that all 3 mac users are well documented ?

    That means I know 67% of all mac users ....

    1. Re:All 3 mac users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jemig de Pemig!

    2. Re:All 3 mac users by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      I said:

      The hold-down-the-button trick is very well known among Mac users, and all three of them are documented thoroughly.

      He said:

      So, basically you're saying that all 3 mac users are well documented?

      Heh. Guess I deserved that for posting while under the influence of sleepy. I hereby deduct one grammar point from my permanent record.

  193. The drive isn't failing (was Re:Apple Responds w/ by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 5, Informative
    I'm damn well suggesting that a drive shouldn't fail when you put in something that is PHYSICALLY COMPATIBLE with a CD. Sure, I don't expect it to be able to handle a cheese sandwich or a sanding disc, but a correctly-sized piece of plastic should be fine.

    The drive isn't failing. It's doing what it's suposed to do. It's reading the equivalent of the boot sector of the CD, and attempting to boot the software on the CD. The software on the CD is then doing deliberately malicious things to the computer. Any computer that's capable of booting or automatically running software from any media is vulnerable to attack from what is in effect a boot sector virus.

    It does seem to me that Sony are sailing very close to some legal winds here. It would not seem to me to be so much a problem if the automatic-load-and-go program opened a window on the Mac screen saying 'this disc cannot be played on Macintosh computers', but this deliberate malicious damage seems to me quite serious.

    Mind you, it's arguable that anyone who buys a Celine Dion record deserves all they get...

    --
    I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
  194. Celine Dion is the devil by inkswamp · · Score: 1

    Trust me on this one. I just have a feeling.

    You know, despite the fact that most geeks are not fans of Satan... er, Celine Dion, a lot of us are married to non-geek females who are. My wife knows almost nothing about computers except how to turn ours on, browse the net, email, etc. The idea that she might go out and buy one of these @#$%&* CDs and come home and unwittingly screw something up while I'm not around makes me a little nervous. I mean, I can tell her about CDs, but what's next?

    --Rick

    --
    --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
  195. It's completely irresponsible to blame Apple by ZxCv · · Score: 2

    In your case, I'd say the drive that burned your CD-R is at fault. Saying that Apple is at fault because these "CDs" can ruin the drives is just ludicrous. It would be like me saying that Nissan is at fault because when I put a new synthetic oil in my car, it ruined the engine. Just as my beef in that case would have to be with the oil maker and not Nissan, if I had a drive toasted by one of these discs, my problem would be with the disc's manufacturer, not with Apple. It is likewise absurd that Apple should just fix the machines and then turn around and try to bill Sony or whoever. Just the logistics in doing that correctly would be hideous, let alone trying to collect any actual money from the disc manufacturers. In the end, it sucks for the users, but the manufacturers of the discs are the ones to blame, not Apple.

    --

    Perl - $Just @when->$you ${thought} s/yn/tax/ &couldn\'t %get $worse;
  196. iTunes by UnConeD · · Score: 0

    This reminds me of that story a while ago that the iTunes-installer could fry your harddrive's partition table in certain cases. Why the heck would a regular installer program be messing with partition tables? Unless of course it was a bug in the filesystem drivers that was triggered for the first time by iTunes...

    1. Re:iTunes by jweatherley · · Score: 1

      A bad UNIX shell script was to blame for the iTunes installer. It only went wrong if you named your drives in a certain way:

      HardDrive
      HardDrive Tunez

      I install iTunes on 'HardDrive Tunez' and the script runs:

      rm -rf HardDrive Tunez/path/to/old/iTunes/stuff

      Ooops! No quotes :(

      --

      --
      Reverse outsourcing: it's the future
  197. Responsibility by Martin+Spamer · · Score: 2


    Apple are *not* responsible. The CD producers are.

    I'd suggest making a claim in the small claims court against the retailer. Apple have supplied the basic evidence you need. If you keep the claim relatively low, repair costs plus *minimal* damage for your time/distress and below the cost of a lawyer for the day, they will not even defend it. You get an automatic win.

    Targeting the retailer also applies strong market pressure not to stock the CD.

  198. Don't bother... by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1, Redundant

    We all know that the result of the class-action lawsuit will be that the record industry will settle, and pay their legal fees in product by sending everyone a $25 gift certificate for one of those giant overpriced chain stores, where $25 might just cover the price of a new CD.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  199. Who cares by t_allardyce · · Score: 2

    Lol, its a good thing that these would still be illigal without the proper labeling.

    Theres a rule, that i think you learn in business school, its pretty important and goes something like "don't piss off your customers in any way unless you have a damn good marketing spin campagne to fool the suckers into coming back"

    I don't care, i have never bought a CD in my life and im not about to start. Why bother paying for something when you can download it or rip other peoples? no its not fair to the record companys but then, life is not fair. People screw me around all the time, and you know what? i couldn't give the slightest crap weather all the major record labels' bosses dropped dead or a plane load of bad artists was smashed into their studios. lol we will probably see activists running around stores spray painting all the protected CDs.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  200. Just like MS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's like those Micro$oft computers, which if you stick in a non-bootable floppy disk, the bootup HANGS! It never skips A: to check if you have Windows or DOS on C:, as many of us in fact do. You have to manually eject the floppy and re-boot the machine to get it to work again.

    Well, Apple got that one right by ejecting non-bootable floppies on bootup, anyway. Shame on all those PC users for buying defective hardware!

    (OK, Ok, calm down, the last thing I want is a flame war, just couldn't resist. ;)

  201. Yea, Apple sux by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    Dear AC,

    I wonder one thing... Would we see 90% of those "Apple is stupid, they should think" style posts if same thing somehow happened on Linux/BSD?

    Be objective... Please!

  202. Re:Does any responsiblity lie with the retailers?? by Self+Bias+Resistor · · Score: 2

    Knowing that retailers are extremely unlikely to provide this service any time soon, may I humbly propose we create a CDNOT.com to catalog all these unplayable discs, and make a plugin available that will warn you, should you attempt to purchase one?

    I know this may be stating the obvious (since this link has been made available on Slashdot many times) but there is a site that is taking on the (unfortunately) increasing task of cataloguing all "copy-protected" CDs. It's called Fat Chuck's and it not only lists "copy-protected CDs" in various regions but also, among other things, gives help to indie artists and gives a list of banned books throughout the world. You can also submit errors and comments on "copy-protected CDs".

    If you find one in a store, excercise your customer (I hate the word consumer, it reinforces this cattle mentality corporations have about us citizens) rights and take it back, clear and simple. What they sold you is not a CD, according to the Red/Blue Book specifications and you have a right to return the product for exchange or refund unless the store specifically says otherwise. And I damn well hope somebody takes legal action because if this latest news is any indication, the record companies are not only selling you products that won't work in your equipment (ie. play and rip) but will actually intentionally damage your equipment (ie. fucking up firmware and forcing reboots, causing potential loss of data). I'm just so sick of this shit.

    --

    ----------
    When the pin is pulled, Mr. Grenade is no longer our friend.

  203. Re: Ah but they are NOT CD's! by @madeus · · Score: 1

    Ah, one important point:

    These disks are *not* Compact Discs!

    It is notable that they do not display the CD logo (and are not permitted to by Phillips) because they do NOT follow the format of Compact Discs. In fact, in place of where the 'Compact Disc' logo normally would be is a warning informing you not to use this disk in a Personal Computer.

    I agree this would be really awful of Apple if Apple did not repair them, but I expect they would (Apple customer services is excellent, if sometimes a little slow (at least IME), they will even repair stupid damage caused by the user at no charge.).

    I expect that they are covering themselves in case this becomes an epedemic.

    Of course it's worrying that these CD's can /apparently/ affect the firmware of an iMac (!) but this could turn out to be a blessing in disguse....used in articles aimed at the general public, it's excellent amunition in the propoganda war against copy protection.

  204. I think it's okay, malice on the part of the "CD" by Kjella · · Score: 2

    I think Apple should sue the "CD" makers for creating intentionally destructive devices intended to cause support costs (angry customers, phone support, returns), remarkably similar to real CDs. Overestimate some FUD noumbers, particularly for unsatisfied customers, say X% of customers scared away x X$ average sales pr. customer (which is almost impossible to determine anyway) and you'll see some nice multi-million figures. Even RIAA don't like to take on big companies.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  205. Re: These discs are NOT CDs! by @madeus · · Score: 1

    (This is not aimed at the previous poster, more a general comment.)

    Just like to point out that that the discs in question are NOT CD's.

    They do not have the Compact Disc logo on them, or on the packaging, nor do they call themselves Compact Discs because they are not actually Compact Discs.

    Phillips have forbidden them to use the term Compact Discs because the do not ahear to the format (which is quite strict - a genuine CD would of course work just fine in an iMac).

    Sure they happen to work in some Compact Disc players, but they are not CD's any more than DVD's are CD's or MiniDiscs are CD's and that what's very important the public inderstand about these new discs - they are not Compact Discs, but an entirely new format (that just happens to work in some exiting CD players).

    Any Compact Disc player that strictly adhears to the CD format will not play these discs.

    Best regards,

  206. Muppet.... by MosesJones · · Score: 2

    "Physically compatible"

    So If I take a bunch of C4 explosive, press it down into a CD shape and put it in then it should still be okay, EVEN if I put a small detonator in that is kicked off by exposure to the light in the CD laser.

    Repeat for fragile glass, cookie dough etc etc...

    The "thing" that is put in is not a CD as the manufacturers of it have not obeyed the first thing in the spec.... compatibility.

    If you wire your Motherboard directly to the mains and it gets fried then you are a fool, if you get supplied with a PC without a transform its the producer of the PC not the motherboard that you should blame.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:Muppet.... by AVee · · Score: 2

      So If I take a bunch of C4 explosive, press it down into a CD shape and put it in then it should still be okay, EVEN if I put a small detonator in that is kicked off by exposure to the light in the CD laser.

      Yes, that is, the firmware should still be okay and say, 'hey, this is not a CD-ROM nor a CD-DA' and then ignore it or eject it.
      And yes, your drive may fail if the stuff explodes, but you couldn't blame the firmware for that...

  207. Join the capitalist fight! Post this ad! by N0Nick · · Score: 1

    In an effort to contribute to the righteous capitalist fight for copyright owners of our dear mates at Sony Entertainment, we have designed this ad to warn innocent citizens of the dangers of PIRACY.

    Give that music-burners macintosh-users communists what they deserve! Join the fight! Post this ad near your workplaces and in your children's schools, show them you care!
    DO NOT LET THE EVIL PIRATES WIN!

    The ad is available for viewing and printing here.

  208. Recorded music sucks... by jolshefsky · · Score: 1
    If you're lucky enough to be in one of the thousand cities and towns that has a local music scene, go check that out instead. Often, for less than the cost of a single CD, you can get the experience of viewing a band play on a new immersion technology called "reality" whereby the viewer experiences live music with all their senses. Plus, you won't believe how realistic the avatars are. System requirements include no CPU, 0MB RAM, 0MB HD, no CD, no soundcard, and no monitor.

    In case you think you need national acts--to paraphrase from one of Rochester, NY's local bands (Burning Snella in their song "Local Music") national bands are just local bands from someplace else.

    If that's not incentive enough, no F--- at Sony gets so much as a penny.

    --
    --- Jason Olshefsky

    Karma: Poser (mostly affected by adding this line long after everyone else did)

  209. $18 by seigel · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wow, with all this copy protection in the CD now it is almost worth the $18 now! I guess they are just trying to make CDs more expensive to make so they can justify the price!

    Good for them.....I am glad they are finally getting the price more inline with the actual costs!

    Cheers

  210. CBS Radio News just covered the story by rbrunner · · Score: 1

    The CBS Radio World News Roundup just mentioned Apple's warning about these CDs. I was pleased to hear that the slant they took was that computers are designed to play standard CDs, and copy protected discs aren't. With the story getting this much play, I doubt that this type of copy protection is going to be around very long. (Undoubtedly to be replaced by some other equally-annoying attempt)

  211. So, could anyone take time from the flamewar .... by pyramid+termite · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... to tell me, please, whether writing on a copy protected CD with a black marker really works? My God, one of the main points of this story has hardly been addressed, except to make jokes about banning post it notes and markers. I guess people are too busy flaming record companies and Apple to address something constructive.

    I'm sorry, but people are posting a lot of drivel here and I'm getting tired of it. Mod me into oblivion for saying this, but one of the main points of this story remains unexamined.

    What's up with that?

  212. This is an APPLE HARDWARE bug by qurob · · Score: 1

    Lets have Apple fix it! Just because nobody in the QA department would admit to listening to Celine Dion.......

  213. Celie Dion at Amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People,
    How about going around this another way. I've just checked the amazon.co.uk website and this 'CD' is referred to as an 'Audio CD' with an appropriate disclaimer attached. Now if you want to do something, why not email Amazon and ask them to stop referring to this 'CD' as a Audio CD (which it isn't as it doesn't adhere to the CD standard) and that they need to recategorise these "pseudo CD". This might not have much success but at least Amazon might get pissed off enough to drop the album (I doubt it though).
    While we're at it why don't we try all the other online CD retailers that sell dubious discs!

  214. Well, maybe it is... by maddogsparky · · Score: 2
    From Apple's knowlege base, it looks like you have to pay out of pocket if the recomended fixes don't work:

    Apple computers are not designed to support copyright protected media that do not conform to such standards. Therefore, any attempt to use non standard discs with Apple CD drives will be considered a misapplication of the product. Under the terms of Apple's One-Year Limited Warranty, AppleCare Protection Plan, or other AppleCare agreement any misapplication of the product is excluded from Apple's repair coverage. Because the Apple product is functioning correctly according to its design specifications, any fee assessed by an Apple Authorized Service Provider or Apple for repair service will not be Apple's responsibility.

    --
    science is a religion
  215. Open Apple? by Creepy · · Score: 1

    read the tech note (previous comment).

    open apple sequence? Um, wasn't that an Apple ][ thingie? The 'open' apple was replaced by the sqiggly command symbol about the time Prince changed his name to the other squiggly symbol. Prince changed his name back, though.

    Macs only had one apple key even when it was an Apple, so 'open' apple is a bit redundant.

    cmd-option-O-F and eject cd works, but I wouldn't recommend it unless you like working in Forth or are feeling especially masochistic, since holding down the left mouse button is much easier.

  216. the old TRS-80 by hawk · · Score: 2
    >Imagine you plug in a monitor and immediately the big internal batteries deliver a huge
    >voltage to your motherboard through the (onboard) video.


    Years ago, the TRS-80 (later dubbed Model 1) used three identical connectors (DIN?) on the back. I knew someone who toasted his when reaching behind to plug it together. It never *occurred* to an engineer that anyone would use the same connector like that, and he plugged the power supply to the monitor output . . .


    hawk

  217. You can still copy the CD.. at 1X speed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yup.. who cares about copy protection?.. as long as my standalone DVD player can read the disc and it outputs the audio digitally (optically), my aging Turtle Beach soundcard on my computer has an optical-input that would gladly accept the signal to record on my computer digitally. So I would have to record in real-time at 1X, but the copy-protected CD would never enter my computer dirctly and I could copy the audio just fine to more CDs or make MP3s with them. The RIAA can eat my ass! Before they are done, a CD won't be able to play in a CD player. :)

  218. Re:USE A DRY ERASE MARKER by Mr.Sharpy · · Score: 1

    Be careful if you decide to try using a dry erase marker. I once wrote on the label side of a Verbatim CD-R with a blue dry erase marker and it disolved the surface and caused it to flake. You could see through the disk in places. I dunno what it would do on the data side of the disk though, but you might take it into consideration.

  219. isn't that . . . by hawk · · Score: 2
    >they might as well repair it when your 8-year-old sticks in a 5" rotary saw blade.


    Isn't that in one of those American Express commercials?


    :)


    hawk

  220. This still isn't fair to most purchasers! by hawk · · Score: 2
    It is fundamentally unfair to require that someone purchasing a Celine Dion "CD" put the "music" in a computer before suffering sever punishment.


    A better solution would be to make the case into a Scroll of Punishment--hopefully the steel ball will slow the tasteless buyer enough on the way to the player that he'll have time to reconsider and never put it in .. . .


    hawk, who also understands that opening a Merle Haggard CD should be a Blessed Scroll of Remove Curse . . .

    1. Re:This still isn't fair to most purchasers! by Don+Negro · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Why do my mod points always expire 12 hours before something like this gets posted?

      Also, I like the Fruedian typo.

      --

      Don Negro
      Perl 6 will give you the big knob. -- Larry Wall

  221. Q: Where to find cdparanoia patch? by g8oz · · Score: 1

    I heard there was a patch to cdparanoia to get around various copy protections schemes like MediaCloq etc. Does anyone know where to get a copy of that?
    Also I heard there was an article in 2600 Hacker's Quarterly a few issues back with more info on circumvention. Does anyone have that info online?

  222. and yet to test this theory.... by Cnik70 · · Score: 0

    you would first have to admit that you bought a Celiene Dion CD and an iMac... I'm actually suprised that this problem ever came to light.

    --
    -Cnik
  223. And like every comp sci graduate.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If your software does crash, it is obviously operator error.

  224. Sounds like a virus to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A small piece of code that is hidden inside some other file or data medium and is automatically run when you try to access that data. The program then causes damage to your computer.

    Nah. That's not a virus. That's a Trojan Horse.

  225. Seen in OS X/Jaguar builds... by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1

    Upon inserting a copy-protected CD, the following dialog box appears:

    "Warning: the media you have inserted is masquerading as a bona fide Compact Disc. We here at Apple are determined to kick the record companies in the nuts, because our company is run by freedom-loving hippies. Click Eject to remove the media, click Burn to fry the disc with the internal laser, or click Sosumi to link directly to a class-action lawsuit."

    .r

    --
    If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
  226. I am curious... by genka · · Score: 1

    Who is Apple's OEM supplier for CD-ROM drives? Could it be Sony. who is a major drive manufacturer? Poetic justice...

  227. Celine Dion sues 3M by TechnoWeenie · · Score: 1

    In other news Celine Dion sues 3M, the inventor of post-it notes under the DMCA for the production of a copy protection circumvention technology.

  228. This is a show of the music industry's stupidity. by killerkoi · · Score: 1

    I find it interesting that they can put and image in a song that will show up on a spectrograph, but they can't create a CD that can play on computer and not be copied.

    I guess that their ineptitude is to our advantage, because a real computer user doesn't use an iMac.

    --
    Film makers are the reason we pull our feet back when something brushes against them.
  229. Post-its and markers illegal? by amigabill · · Score: 1

    So, is RIAA going to sue the magic marker and post-it industries out of existence, or at least get the distribution/sale of such DMCA protection circumvention tools banned?

    Man, I'm going to have to find something else to scribble notes on and with, or find a way to recycle the pile of post-its on my desk. Perhaps pencils won't be banned, which will make reusing the paper easier anyway.

    1. Re:Post-its and markers illegal? by Xepherys2 · · Score: 1

      For as ridiculous as it sounds, this is actually quite an amusing concept.

      Technically, because this method is being used to defeat copy-protection, it IS in violation of the DMCA. Sadly, this goes to show how poorly the Act in question is written, and how obsurdly it could be interpretted. However, I wouldn't be too amazed these days to see such a lawsuit occur. I mean, seriously... these RIAA folks are getting a bit far-fetched trying to save their precious dollars (which, BTW, they are STILL not actually losing). Oh well, chalk one up for insanity!

      -Xeph

    2. Re:Post-its and markers illegal? by cwsulliv · · Score: 1

      More likely to be charged under the DMCA is Slashdot - for posting links to the offshore site where this circumvention scheme is explained.

  230. Re:Does any responsiblity lie with the retailers?? by swordgeek · · Score: 2

    Hmmm.

    If the retailer told you it was a CD, then maybe. If they told you it would play on your stereo, then maybe. If they called themselves a CD shop, and didn't have any actual CDs, then maybe.

    But most retailers I know of are "music stores." Most staff would shrug and go "I dunno" if you asked them if it followed red-book specs. The retailer should have a MORAL responsibility, but they almost definitely don't have a LEGAL one. They'd have to work pretty hard to explicitly mislead their customers far enough to get in any trouble.

    There's an interesting articleon C|NET about whether Apple should be responsible or liable. The answer is pretty clear: Should they be liable if you put a peanut butter and jelly sandwich in your CD tray? Well then, why should they be responsible if you put one of these things in?

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  231. This can't possibly last. by Jaffro · · Score: 1

    Isn't this malicious code? A virus? It's even more crippling than any current Mac viruses. I'm surprised that Microsoft isn't trying to patent this technology already. It could potentially target a better demographic than any email ever could. Imagine being able to disable the computers of all Kenny G, Yanni, Celine Dion or Enya fans. It actually doesn't sound so bad! The musicians are going to be the ones that get hurt in the end for even participating with this. Their incompetent fans will struggle to fix their $2000 computer and will hold it against them. This is going to get completely smacked down in court. There are already laws protecting us against this kind of thing. They prosecuted the guy who wrote the Melissa virus... so they can do the same for anyone who knowingly harms your desktop. Plus it even encroaches on fair use laws. Might want to buy your Star Wars Episode 2 soundrtrack now. It will be a huge collector's item... Just like that stupid Milli Vanilli disc.

  232. What? by joeblowme · · Score: 1

    How do you figure this is an apple hardware bug? Apple's cdrom drive is designed to play cd's this so called cd does not conform to the cd standards thus the problem. It's obviously the manufacturers of the disk fault. They should put big warnings on these things that they may damage your equipment. I can't see how the RIAA thinks this will stop the spread of piracy since now I know these disks may jack up my equipment I am even less likely to buy one and I'm more likely to got to kazaa, imesh, or bearshare and download, so I don't hose up the equipment that I spent money on. The only people this copy protection hurts are the people who were spending money on CD's in the first place. This is the most jacked up approach to stopping piracy and what is the most jacked up is at the end of the year when record sales have gone down again they will blame it on file swapping software and not this copy protection technology and thier poor treatment of thier customers.

    --

    If your not cheating your not trying. If your not trying your not winning and if your not winning why play?
  233. don't give 'em money, give it to someone else by Seor+Pelo · · Score: 1

    How about just quit purchasing your albums from the large record companies? There are so many bands, labels and studios out there that are against (or are ignoring) this large record companies battle. Try independent music. I was introduced to it a few years ago by friends and my younger brother. There's music from any genre there for you to listen to. Try out www.epitonic.com. They have so many great bands listed. I keep on thinking that I've come across all of the indie bands that I enjoy listening to, but at least once a week another band surfaces.

  234. What comes next... by darkcookie · · Score: 1

    ...a program in an autostart data track that formates your hard drive?

    darkcookie

  235. Never count on sane input by Sloppy · · Score: 1

    A very basic principle of design is that you never count on external input being sane or well-formed. It is an Apple defect for their machine to behave this poorly when given a nonstandard CD. At worst, it should decide "I can't make sense of this" and eject the disc.

    I can understand how they didn't take all the cases into account -- they probably didn't anticipate that people would be trying to play defective CDs and probably they didn't have any defective CDs to test with, so I'm not gonna say "Apple sucks" or something dumb like that. Almost anyone can fall for a dirty trick like that -- once. Nevertheless, it is ultimately their fault. Hopefully the next wave of machines will be more resistant.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  236. The cynical question by Zone5 · · Score: 1

    The more interesting question to me is, given what it can do to a Mac, what would happen if you threw this into a Vaio laptop? Would it magically work there?

    Sony: "Hey, buy our laptops, they're the only ones guaranteed to play all CDs out there! Even copy-protected CDs!" Bastards. Next there'll be EULAs on the CDs that grant you license to use the CD only on an approved brand of computer, and only if you've paid your listener license fee for the year and can verify that in writing.

    --
    "So on one hand, honey is an amazingly sophisticated and efficient food source. On the other hand it's bee backwash."
  237. never underestimate the power of... by mesach · · Score: 1

    engrish!!!!

    Newly Tasty Improved Enhanced in german

    --
    moo.
  238. Re:Yup, permanent damage; nope, Apple won't cover by Knobby · · Score: 2

    I agree! Apple is doing the right thing by not covering this.

    I'd love to see Apple take it a step further and begin posting large warnings in their stores and on their website warning their potential customers. Now, that would piss off the RIAA, wouldn't it?

  239. Wondering... by sirgoran · · Score: 1

    Would Office Depot and Office Max and any other office supply store in the US be sued for selling these clear violations of the DMCA? After all, if posting the DeCSS code in any form is a violation then wouldn't selling Post-its and Sharpies also be a violation?

    This would make a great Simpson's episode!

    -Goran

    --
    Carpe Scrotum - The only way to deal with your competition.
  240. Music Industry, Dummy up time is now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you have to change your business model because the
    world has changed.
    cut costs like every other industry.
    lower your prices.
    people intuitively know that online music costs
    you very little after your intital costs.
    you want to charge me how much for a 30 year old
    doors tune ?
    It think it's time we passed a law putting music
    into public domain after 50 years.

    ps. your customers all hate you and being in the
    music industry these days is rapidly becoming as
    bout as cool as being in the oil industry.

    iow.
    you are becoming Dick Cheney.

    Drop your prices significantly now or prepare
    for the world to dance on your grave.

  241. Online retailers calling it a "CD" by vaxer · · Score: 2

    CDnow lists A New Day Has Come as a CD. Since it's not actually a CD, isn't this misleading? If Philips informed them that it's not a CD, and they kept misusing the term, wouldn't that be fraud?

  242. Alright, finally some good music! by uigrad_2000 · · Score: 2
    I used to buy CD's. But, I stopped when the music industry started creating copy-protected CD's. I don't want to support the RIAA, and have only bought independantly-released disks since the Charlie Pride debacle came out. I haven't really missed them. I have enough old music to keep me happy.

    I generally feal guilty about grabbing mp3s where I haven't bought the disk. But even a goody-two shoes like me doesn't feel guilty about copying a disk with this dumb copy-protection stuff. I figure that if I wanted the music enough to buy it the CD, I still couldn't because it won't work with my OS (linux).

    And since then my music has been limited to what discs have been copy-protected. I hate country, so Charlie Pride wasn't anything I was interested. Boy bands are a similair story.

    But NOW I CAN STEAL CELINE DION! And, if other posters are correct, then I can steal the Ep2 soundtrack without feeling guilty!!!

    Things are looking better all the time!

    --
    Free unix account: freeshell.org
  243. Allready Ripped... by loply · · Score: 1

    I used my hifi/computer setup to put the entire CD on Kazaa @ 98kbs this afternoon.
    Nobody seems to have downloaded any of it yet though (lol).
    I will part exchange the CD for JK2 tomorow :)

  244. Re:Everybody stock up on Sharpies! - NEWS AT 11! by prisoner-of-enigma · · Score: 2

    WASHINGTON, D.C. - May 14, 2002 - DEA BUSTS SUSPECTED SHARPIE HOARDING OPERATION

    DEA spokesman Captain L. I. Bee released information today of a successful "sting" operation where thousands of Fully Automatic Terrorist Media Stealing Assault Weapons (formerly known as Sharpie markers) were being rebranded and sold as hallucinogenic inhalants.

    "It was shocking", said Captain L. I. Bee. "Everywhere, on shelves, in boxes, were hundreds, perhaps thousands of these insidious devices. While our friends and colleagues in the media industries are joining hands to stamp out media terrorism, the DEA will not be standing by the wayside in this matter. We have classified Sharpies as a controlled substance and, with time, we expect a mandatory death sentence for anyone caught making, selling, or posessing any such device."

    --
    In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us. - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
  245. Mainstream News by ABeit · · Score: 1

    Why doesn't this ever seem to show up on CNN or Fox News? The average consumer has no knowledge about this issue because it only shows up on news sites like slashdot and arstechnica. It's a widespread threat to consumer freedom that is being largely ignored by mainstream news channels.

  246. Re:The drive isn't failing (was Re:Apple Responds by fishbowl · · Score: 2

    >it's arguable that anyone who buys a Celine Dion record deserves all they get...

    Ok, but I can envision many scenarios where a person with otherwise good taste can find himself in the position of using a publication in the course of work or research that he might not use for entertainment. Say I'm working on my masters' and researching the irish whistle and uileann pipe in lat 20th century popular music. Guess what artist had material with such a complement? So there is a way I could be directly affected without even being a fan of the music.

    How about this: A youth puts this disc in a public (or school) library's Mac. The computer "breaks." The librarian, who is half gator, has the visitor banned, labeled as a 'hacker', expelled from school, prosecuted under some 'for the children' statute, and nobody but slashdot readers ever considers that it
    s SONY who should be punished.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  247. I disagree by Aapje · · Score: 2

    It's extremely stupid that Windows tries to read your disks when they are removed. It has irritated me often. MacOS handles that much better by actually removing open windows/drives when you eject a storage device. That isn't possible with a hardware-controlled eject. Learning to reboot with the mouse-button down isn't that hard in those rare cases that a CD won't eject.

    PS. What does the key sequence for booting have to do with this (pressing 'c' on my 1997 G3)?

    --

    The Drowned and the Saved - Primo Levi
  248. harm firmware? by langed · · Score: 1
    Hmm. Last time I checked, I thought firmware was burned onto a chip. Thus it cannot be harmed...
    Of course, after flash BIOS came out, that might not be quite so accurate anymore.

    Nevertheless, I wish I owned a mac or two to test this on. More likely the disk being locked in the drive and not being removed is simply causing the mac to not boot, because it was configured to boot off a CD if it recognized the disc as bootable.

    I'd be more interested to see that some hobbyist tried it in a mac, and instead of shipping the mac back to the dealer like an average user, he/she removed the CD and verified that the system returned to its normal happy mac icon boot sequence.

    Once again giving up the ability to mod down the trolls to add a bit of insight that appears to have been missed.

  249. Re:Does any responsiblity lie with the retailers?? by Xepherys2 · · Score: 1

    Simply put... no! Or at least not really. Even 'swordgeek's thoughts on moral responsibility fall a touch shy of target here.

    Currently, I am gainfully employed at my local CompUSA. I sell iMacs to customers every so often. Now that I am aware of this issue, I will surely point it out to my future customers. However, before just a few days ago, I was wholly unaware of this issue, and therefore had no way to be morally OR legally responsible.

    The same applies with music stores. As was mentioned previously, I doubt that most employees of your local FYE, Harmony House, Barnes and Noble, or other music store even KNOW what colorbook standards ARE, little well if an individual disc comforms to one. I would further assume that Sony, et al, did not send out pre-release information about the new copy-protected discs except POSSIBLY to say, "Hey... these are copy protected". Therefore, even moral responsibility seems not realistic.

    However, perhaps we can all educate our local music/Apple dealers. It surely never hurts!

    -Xeph

  250. A change of law? by Xepherys2 · · Score: 1

    Aside from the main comments about this article... what laws might be affected by this. Currently, I believe, Federal law prohibits retailers from taking returns on opened CD-based products, as it could be copied and break copyright laws. Since these new discs are copy-protected, do they still fall under the same laws? Also, since they are not technically CDs, does the same apply?

    What reaction has anyone received when trying to return one of these discs? What course of action seems to work best? Are there any retailers that are recognizing this issue currently?

    I'd personally love to hear some reactions to this.

    -Xeph

  251. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! (Sign-Up Here) by Dracas · · Score: 1

    Greetings All, "First Time User, First Time Reader" As for this issue, I have done some research into the matter and looked up the all familar "Fraud and Related Activity in Connection with Computers" 18 U.S.C 1030. Do to space length I will only post this clause from Section A, Sub-section 5,A,i which states: Whoever - "knowingly causes the transmission of a program, information, code, or command, and as a result of such conduct, intentionally causes damage without authorization, to a protected computer;" will be subjected to this law. Therefore this is the question: Does the "Audio Disc" contain coding which fries the computer (IE: iMac)? [Strong Case] Or do iMac's lock-up because of the unknown format of the "Audio Disk" (basically then this would be a hardware problem)? [Weak Case] At any rate, as we all know with our law system, "Anyone can sue anyone for anything." Good luck on the case! Dracas

  252. Mod the above up! by Thomas+A.+Anderson · · Score: 1
    As much as I would like to think this AC is wrong, I suspect they're right. :(

    Now, I *still* think that a boycott is in order (along with supporting independent artists). Even if we have no *legal* right to play music cd's on our computers (and dvd's on our linux box), we can certainly assert our desire to do so - by only support companies that allow us to do these things.

    --
    Personally its not God I dislike, its his fan club I cant stand (bash.org)
  253. So buy the CD... by keep_it_simple_stupi · · Score: 1

    And then download the MP3's off Morpheus. I wonder if the RIAA cares if you bought the CD first or not... hmmmm...

  254. This disk is being sold as an Audio CD by Gleef · · Score: 2

    From Apple's Knowledgebase Article regarding this it implies that this product (and a couple of others) fall into that category of disks that do not qualify for the CD logo. Therefore they are not CDs.

    However, stores are marketing this as if it were a CD:
    * CDNow lists it as a "CD"
    * Amazon lists the media type as "Audio CD"
    * CD Universe lists it as a "CD"

    If you have purcased a copy protected disk without the CD logo, and it was marketed as an actual CD, you do have grounds to return the disk. Even more so if you got it online and had no opportunity to examine the logo and see warning labels on the disk. If they give you any problems, report them to the Better Business Bureau and/or your state's Attorney General.

    --

    ----
    Open mind, insert foot.
  255. Re:Oh no! (Aphex Twin) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's only the german release which is handled by Zomba. Drukqs is released on a nice little company called Warp Records and they don't do this stuff.

  256. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! (Sign-Up Here) by ppolf · · Score: 1

    Why all this talk about lawsuits?! You are not possibly going to make a big enough financial impact with a class action lawsuit to teach this company a lesson! How about jail time? As has been mentioned before...this sounds very very much like a virus. Virus writers go to jail...why not record company executives?

  257. I thought that nothing would make we want one!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I thought that nothing would make me buy a Celine Dion CD but now that I know they'll break IMacs I'll take 2. Wish I could get those hunks of junk off my real network!

  258. Malicious Code by The_Rippa · · Score: 1

    Sony can make a CD with content that disables your CD-ROM and screws with your firmware.

    If I did that, it'd be equal to a "virus" and I'd be thrown in jail.

    BTW - Kinda ironic how the ads for Sony's new NetMD recorder ENCOURAGE you to rip music.

  259. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! (Sign-Up Here) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..."Audio Disk"...

    Disc = Optical storage (CD, DVD)
    Disk = Magnetic storage (HD, Floppy)

    might wanna get that straight before the lions around here eat you alive.

  260. Where is the big joke? by rocca · · Score: 1

    I was really expecting to see something along the lines of the fact that Celine Dion can kill computers with her music. We knew it had the same effect on mice and other small rodents, but this is definite a step up for her.

  261. In other news... by gerardrj · · Score: 1

    The software publishers association today announced a new copy protection scheme for computer software.
    The new CDs containing the most commonly pirated software will no loger function when placed in the CD-ROM drives of personal computers.
    When asked how customers would install the software the SPA spokesperson stated "That's not for us to worry about, we're just out to protect the rights and bottom lines of our member companies. We feel it necessary to prevent the ability to make exact digital copies of our software, and this is the only way we can thing to accomplish that goal."

    --
    Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
  262. Marker pens by pls · · Score: 1

    How about that. In some cases the rumors about a green marker pen improving CD play are true.

    But does this mean that possessing a green or black marker pen is now illegal under the DMCA because it's a tool for defeating digital copy protection?

    ++PLS

  263. Re:Oh no! (Aphex Twin) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally, someone who realizes that Aphex Twin is a huge joke, that should never have seen any success. Richard James intentionally irritates through his music, and yet he just beomes all the more popular. It's so wrong.

  264. some PC reads it and rips it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my father bought the Celine Dion CD, and we tried to put it in the PC (running Windows): we could listen to it (analog access), and we could rip it and encode it mp3, with both CD2WAV32 (the mp3 was sounding good) and CDEX (but CDEX was reporting a lot of jetter errors, and I did not have time to listen to it). Just my 2c

  265. Moderators on crack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is the above comment "redundant?" This is exactly what happened with the class-action lawsuit against Nintendo during the 8-bit days when they used lock-out chips to prevent real competition for NES games and kept prices artificially high.

  266. Copy protection not supported under Windows XP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thought this was funny, since M$ is into digital rights manglment...

    On a Windows XP machine, I did the following:

    Insert CD, view list of the tracks explorer (like any CD)

    Double-clicked a track to play it and Windows blue screens.

    Machine boots, hangs (while trying to mount the CD?) Eject the CD and wait for startup to finish.

    Put the CD back in the (same) drive. Can now play
    the tracks.

    Note: PC (and drives) are only a few months old.
    Note Also: Linux PC could read CD with cdda2wav but one drive refused to read the CD because of a bad "lead-out" time (?)

  267. An interesting lawsuit angle by topping · · Score: 1

    There is a premise of US law called "selective enforcement" which basically comes down to the fact that you can't arrest one person doing something and not arrest another person for breaking the same law at the same time.

    In all seriousness, could Sony *not* suing marker companies be used against them in a case where someone was being sued for writing tools to disable the copy protection with software? It's not like Sony could say that they didn't know about this "tool" (felt-tip pens) being used to thwart DMCA, so if they don't sue marker companies, they are guilty of selective enforcement.

    It's too bad that the system has to be used against itself to kill bad laws such as DMCA.

  268. CNN and Apple articles on the same topic by scubacuda · · Score: 2

    Interestingly, here is what CNN and Apple have to say about it.

  269. Re:Oh no! (Aphex Twin) by Reductionist · · Score: 1

    Selected Ambient Works 85-92 is actually quite nice.. The first time I heard it back in '93 was one of those pivotol listening experiences that turned me on to electronic music in general. Selected Ambient Works II, while quite a departure from the former, is probably one of the most creative, yet disturbing pieces of music I've ever heard. Sort of thing you would listen to after eating a tray of magic brownies while driving through the industrial nightmare landscape of the New Jersey Turnpike.

    As for his most recent stuff, basically anything since '95/'96, I've been seriously disappointed. Perhaps the fame got to his head, as the one time 'Mozart in Mirrorshades' seems content to produce albums full of mostly shrieking noise.