Slashdot Mirror


Sun Sued Over H1-B Workers

heli0 writes "The Boston Globe is reporting: 'A lawsuit filed yesterday in California alleges computer giant Sun Microsystems Inc. laid off thousands of American high-tech workers in order to replace them with younger, lower-paid engineers from India.' Could this be the straw that breaks the proverbial camel's back?"

1,002 comments

  1. In short by Hatechall · · Score: 0, Funny

    No.

    1. Re:In short by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't want to read any further, this is what is being discussed:

      1. Americans arguing that H1-B visas are being used illegally by companies to obtain cheap labor.

      2. Those with the visas calling them racist in retaliation.

      Blah.

    2. Re:In short by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's why the camels back wont break...

      H1-B workers have an economic benefit.

      1) Back in the day, robots didnt cause mass unemployment when they were introduced. Would slashdotters have a problem if robots were replacing these workers instead of humans?
      And no, there is no net taxpayer burden caused by human workers, becaue they pay taxes and their fair share too.

      2) Next time you apply for a job put "I require H1-B sponsorship" on top in bold letters. See how many calls you won't get!

    3. Re:In short by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really don't understand what you all mean. If software should be given away for free there is no possibility to pay high-payed american workers.

      Do you open source zealots have a hard time deciding?

    4. Re:In short by ph1ll · · Score: 2, Funny
      I'm all for bringing cheap, foreign workers in to take the job of incompetent, expensive natives.

      So, when do we start inviting Indian managers over?

      :-D

      --
      --- "We've always been at war with Eastasia."
  2. Sux it down Sun... by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hey Sun, since you're an American company working mostly with American companies, how about employing some Americans? Sux it down Sun. Have fun with the lawsuit. System.err.print("We're being sued. HELP!!!!")

    1. Re:Sux it down Sun... by rmadmin · · Score: 1

      Amen to that!

    2. Re:Sux it down Sun... by elmegil · · Score: 1, Informative

      So where were you when Halliburton et. al. were all moving their hq's to Bermuda to dodge taxes on all that government money they're profiting from?

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    3. Re:Sux it down Sun... by soapvox · · Score: 1

      I agree, I understand that companies are beholden to share holders but what about also being beholden to the communities and economies that support you.

    4. Re:Sux it down Sun... by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've got a better idea! Let's rehire all the American employees and replace the entire management team with people from India. w00t!

    5. Re:Sux it down Sun... by dharma21 · · Score: 1

      Getting promoted to his new office as Vice President.

    6. Re:Sux it down Sun... by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Communities don't support companies. Consumers trade their money for a good or service from a company. After that the transaction is done. There is no further obligation from either party past that point. This whole line of reasoning that the company then still owes you something really reeks of communist ethos.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    7. Re:Sux it down Sun... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People should not take this personally, Sun are not bad people they have just woke up and realised what the game really is. If Microsoft have been doing it for so long then why shouldnt Sun???

      The case is simple they should not be doing this, but if one business can get away with it then others will follow (sometimes not as quick) but maybe you should be looking at other people who are doing it as well, dont hate Sun cause they are playing the game!!!

    8. Re:Sux it down Sun... by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That kind of thinking is getting thrown out the door. I gotta tell ya, between this, Enron, and Global Crossing, I'm not in favor of a government mandated class in Business Ethics for all CEOs and Executive Management staffs of all companies. WTF boyz???? Did someone flip the switch under the "Let's make profit no matter how many people we screw over!!!"

    9. Re:Sux it down Sun... by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 1

      Good points. Microsoft should be sued to to keep the playing field level. ...and IBM while we're at it. ...and Dell too!

    10. Re:Sux it down Sun... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is, THEY ARE FROM INDIA, at least one of the founders (So probably all his mgt. friends), thats why they're replacing all the Americans with Indians...

    11. Re:Sux it down Sun... by malfunct · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What the company does owe is the government of this country. They are under legal obligation to follow certain rules (one of them being to hire a US worker instead of an H1-B worker if a US worker is available for the job) that they agreed to in order to get the benifit of operating thier business in this country.

      --

      "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

    12. Re:Sux it down Sun... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats what you get with republicans, get the democrats back in.

    13. Re:Sux it down Sun... by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 1

      Should be "I'm now in favor..."

    14. Re:Sux it down Sun... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Business ethics" is as much of an oxymoron as "military intelligence" or "desktop linux". If you want to fight this sort of thing, form a union and/or start a political campaign to get some legislation introduced.

    15. Re:Sux it down Sun... by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 1

      God help us but I may have to agree. :-( I've got a good idea! Perhaps the government course in Business Ethics could be taught by none other than Bill Clinton. Attendees would have to go through the entire class just like the teacher - with their pants down around their ankles. ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    16. Re:Sux it down Sun... by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 1

      Gee, I thought the conscience God gave everyone would work just as well. I could never believe that the Board of Directors at Sun didn't have any pangs of conscience when they knowingly let all those people go.

    17. Re:Sux it down Sun... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      arnt you full of hope, you sound like, an Iraqi whos house just got bombed.

    18. Re:Sux it down Sun... by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      If prevented from bringing HB-1 workers here, the companies will simply reduce their workforce here and setup shop and expand in whatever foreign country is the cheapest.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    19. Re:Sux it down Sun... by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 0, Troll

      Bingo. Bingo. Bingo.

    20. Re:Sux it down Sun... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Wow, you really need to look into the history of the labour movement. Can I recommend "The Road To Wigan Pier" by George Orwell. It'll show you just how "ethical" companies can be when they're not up against a powerful union.

    21. Re:Sux it down Sun... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least the democrats tryied to put a stop to the manopolies that are played by corps like MS, unlike the Republicans, they are satisfied with just a few computers that Bill dishes out every year while he makes billions more from his monopoly, can Bush actually add 2+2???

    22. Re:Sux it down Sun... by arkanes · · Score: 1

      I can. It's easy to do stuff like that when you're just looking at numbers on a balance sheet. And you'd be AMAZED at how self-centered some people can be, and for some reason buisness and upper managment attracts these people.

    23. Re:Sux it down Sun... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are they not already doing that!!! I guess its not bad if they set up else where and reduce the workforce in the US, or is it!!! It seems to me that things like this can not really be avoided, no matter what way you look at it the corp will get away with it at the end of the day.

    24. Re:Sux it down Sun... by Jason+Earl · · Score: 1

      If the new Indian management team is any good then the first thing that they will do is move a good portion of the company to India. After all, you get more bang from your buck using low cost Indian coders. So now nearly the entire company will be from India instead of merely a portion of the company.

      You see, this isn't a social problem, it's an economic one. Talented Indian workers are willing to work for less than American workers.

    25. Re:Sux it down Sun... by ergo98 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      So what is your point? Sun operates in the US, taking advantage of the H1B, because of the security, lack of corruption, good healthcare, etc. They are deriving definite benefits from operating in the US, and clearly it is their first choice over completely moving overseas. In essence Sun is having their cake and eating it too, abusing a system that was created because of the theoretical (and completely unproven lack of talent). Note that I'm not an American, nor do I live in the US, but given the supposed reason that H1Bs exist, one would think that every single H1B technology worker would have long been sent home. Instead companies like Sun keep using it as a bargaining tool to unfairly take advantage of the little guy. Of course this will hurt them as many of us have a real distasteful impression of Sun : I wouldn't touch their products personally.

      BTW: Before everyone yaps on about how the US worker had better suck it up and deal with it or they'll relocate to India, let me give you a more realistic scenario - Nothing is stopping the next Sun or Microsoft or Oracle or Intel from sprouting up as a home-grown venture in India, or wherever, given the supposed incredible talent and work ethics. Why haven't they?

    26. Re:Sux it down Sun... by jasonisgodzilla · · Score: 2, Interesting

      then let them go. If they are not hiring american workers then let them move their asses over seas. Then they can get import tariffs placed on all their goods and we can start buying products from and American company with American staff.

    27. Re:Sux it down Sun... by letxa2000 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Actually, if you honestly consider the events of the last decade... There were many CEOs doing and getting away with bad things under Democrats. It came to light and is being punished under a Republican administration.

      Given that reality, how some people can blame the Republicans just goes to show how blind people can be when they want to be.

    28. Re:Sux it down Sun... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Oh please, grow up. I'm sure you'd rather have your welfare check increased having the demorats in power but those of us who WORK for a living would rather keep the money we earn.

    29. Re:Sux it down Sun... by JimFromJersey · · Score: 1

      Yeah and then all of America can be like ... California - broken schools, 3$/gal gas, all day traffic jams, 10 of the top 25 cities with the highest unemployment, pollution, crime. Oh yeah, I wanna live like that.

      and certainly with blow-job-billy American jobs were being protected and no one hired H1-Bs. Moron.

      --
      between the greater and lesser infinities sleep the dreams undreamt
    30. Re:Sux it down Sun... by Jurjels · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, that's untrue. Communities do support companies by giving them tax cuts, paving roads, providing services like water and sewer, etc. What you speak of, is a financial transaction that exists in a vacuum, not in reality. Companies and communities can and should have a mutually beneficial relationship.

    31. Re:Sux it down Sun... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      then let them go. If they are not hiring american workers then let them move their asses over seas. Then they can get import tariffs placed on all their goods and we can start buying products from and American company with American staff.

      The problem is that tarrifs are being torn down. what do you think this free trade nonsense is about?

    32. Re:Sux it down Sun... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to be confusing business ethics with someone's marriage. Good hee-haw redneck answer though.

    33. Re:Sux it down Sun... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like the Senator Hollings (D) from California? Being in the pockets of corporations is a bi-partisan practice.

    34. Re:Sux it down Sun... by elphkotm · · Score: 1

      Ethnical Business Practices... like Whitewater.

      --

      <Amanda`> I just went out to the parking lot in my bathrobe to exchange warez CDs.
    35. Re:Sux it down Sun... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You ROFLMAO at your own jokes? At not even good ones? Pathetic.

    36. Re:Sux it down Sun... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point(s)

    37. Re:Sux it down Sun... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or we can buy Linux servers from a smaller firm.

      I used to really like Sun. I was not as knowledgable about computing them, but Java captured the press, so I played around with it, wrote some 'hello, world'
      applets (I was an English major), even hosted my site on a dedicated low-cost Netra for a time (lousy bandwidth moved me over... this was a while ago).

      I even thought, when they got Linux appliance maker Cobalt, that that was great, 'cause now Cobalt's reliability issues would be solved, and there'd be new, easy-to-use models with better chips (Cobalts ran K6-2s).

      Then it turned out that Sun never improved on the Cobalt line. I swear, they just bought that company to kill the product.

      I think Sun is in real trouble. They may have $5 billion or whatever, and they may have lots of long-term government-type contracts that'll keep 'em from going bankrupt soon, but I'll never buy or use their products again. My site is now moving to three servers, so I'm not a completely insignificant customer. I also recommend purchases for other people, and I would never recommend Sun.

      Forget them. In some ways they're worse than the beast.

    38. Re:Sux it down Sun... by DuckDuckBOOM! · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You see, this isn't a social problem, it's an economic one.
      And a political one. This is one of the few areas over which the Constitution explicitly gives Congress authority. Since they've rarely held back in regulating other areas of commerce over which they (arguably) have no authority whatsoever, one has to wonder why they're so reluctant to rein this one in...
      --
      Life is like surrealism: if you have to have it explained to you, you can't afford it.
    39. Re:Sux it down Sun... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It came to light and is being punished under a Republican administration.

      Being punished? Who's being punished, besides the typical American stockholder?

      The president has been notoriously silent about all the financial scandals, refusing to talk about Dick Cheney's meetings with Enron, refusing to beef up the SEC, saying that the crisis 'proves the market works.' What a load of shit.

      Ken Lay and company played dice with Enron worker's livelihoods, and they're not in jail. The CEOs of Ford and Firestone decided that a recall for their tires wouldn't be cost-effective, and it cost hundreds of lives (they are currently lobbying to limit the amount they must pay in lawsuits).

      But don't worry about that, our fearless leader (who could have possibly been involved in insider trading himself) is off to make things safe in Iraq! No need to worry about the economy, it'll take care of itself! See, the system does work!

    40. Re:Sux it down Sun... by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      Nothing is stopping the next Sun or Microsoft or Oracle or Intel from sprouting up as a home-grown venture in India, or wherever, given the supposed incredible talent and work ethics.

      Have you ever considered that "capital" might be a factor in "capitalism"?

    41. Re:Sux it down Sun... by #!/bin/allen · · Score: 1

      First off, I live in America and come from what I think is a moderately liberal family.

      Let's look at the strict definition above. The company or it's management is only responsible to it's customers for as much as they can demand, their suppliers for as much as they can demand, and their owners for as much as they can demand. The best example of this I can come up with is the non-George version of Bedford Falls in "It's a wonderful life."

      Each community is impacted by the people and companies in it far more than the direct interchanges we see. It has a flavor that is the combination of past and present citizens and organizations.

      Across America you can see that the principles that previous generations held, or at least held in general, have been discarded in favor of bean counters measures of worth. There are few real national reputations. Most of what we think of as reputation is really a mathematical measure of how well someone has done financially or a similar measure of how politically successful they have been at representing their clients.

      I was a Republican as a kid, a Democrat since Reagan and now though I hate to say it, I feel more sympathy for the socialists of the 20's and 30's. We are coming to the same place as our country was in the 1890s, where public unrest at corporate skullduggery against their customers and employees caused some governmental controls to be imposed (many of which are now being dismantled). I hope that the current government will not wait for the threat violence before they begin to restore the balance between companies' desire for profit and the individuals "inalienable rights."

      --
      sed 's/commun/terror/g' mccarthy > bush; sed 's/terror/saddam/g' bush > bush_wacked
    42. Re:Sux it down Sun... by MonopolyNews · · Score: 1

      are you kidding me? American companies are supported a million ways by the government. Usually providing basic infrastructure in some manner or other.

      --

      Slashdot Journal on Monopoly News
    43. Re:Sux it down Sun... by Catbeller · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Communist"? Plonk.

      Companies do not exist as an entities that serves only themself. For the most part, they are corporations.

      What are corporations? Legal fictions designed to shield shareholders from personal liability. Most people stop the definition at that point. But they are wrong.

      Corporations are LICENSED TO EXIST by the representatives of the people of the United States. They do not have a "right" to exist. They have no "rights" to anything -- they are not people, no matter what Supreme Court idiots have ruled.

      It is good and proper that businesses exist to enable a free market of goods and services. But they exist to serve the needs of the people of the United States of America. Period.

      Is is a two-way deal. For exemption from personal liability, the fictitious individuals known as corporations are subject to the laws of the USA. They should in general serve the public good of the people of the United States.

      This point is crucial. We have been sold the lie that businesses exist only to make a profit, and at that point owe no one anything.

      But they seem to think that the US owes them free roads, free forests, free education for their workers, free pensions for their retiress, free medical care for those they fire, evironmental exemptions, free access to the power of the three branches of government.

      Businesses exist for the people's benefit, and the people of the US in turn pay for the infrastructure in which business operate.

      Business owes goods and services in this bargain. THEY ALSO OWE THE COMMUNITY JOBS IN EXCHANGE FOR ALL THE FREE GOODIES THEY GET. AND FOR THE LICENSE TO EXIST AT ALL.

      Here's where the radical right wing screaming starts. They no longer believe they owe jobs, or taxes, or even competition for their goods and services. They owe nothing to anyone. Period.

      That is no longer a beneficial arrangement. It is a parasitical one. The wealthiest draining jobs and taxes away from the people who have financed their infrastructure, and granted license for them to exist at all.

      Business is NOT AN ALTERNATIVE TO GOVERNMENT. It is not independent of it. It is subject to the will of the people who let them exist at all. And those people believe that they should, at the very least, be employed by the companies which are located in their own country.

      The eventual outcome of the present process will be twofold: jobs continually pumped to overpopulated countries around the world, where sheer numbers depress wages to pennies on the dollar paid in the US. Massive economic depression across the US. Wages decreasing. Schools starved for money. Price deflation.

      At the same time, ever-growing profits pumped to a small number of executives, and indirectly to the service industries which sell to the very wealthy. At this end, price inflation.

      The only safe harbor in the businesses-do-what-they-we-owe-you-shit is to be an executive. Everyone else eventually becomes a peon.

      There is no break on the cycle once it starts. The reason why European countries are nightmares of strikes and taxes is that they have cut a deal between what they are, with jobs and wages relatively stable, with the crashing cycle that we have embraced.

      Communism. Ah, the old boogieman. It never gets old.

      Here: the idea of free markets determining wages and prices works -- if there is no hypergrowing population of people who will work for pennies on our dollars. Massive growth in the number of workers will drag wages down for everyone, everywhere. Wages can't rise. Not without a catastrophic adjustment in human numbers.

      Business executives know all this, and they are playing to become robber barons of the 21st and 22nd centuries. They don't give a damn what happens to people lower down than their elevated positions. They are social Darwinists. Economic collapse makes them stronger and wealthier, and more powerful.

    44. Re:Sux it down Sun... by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      Is your presumption that a lack of monetary funds is what keeps "foreign" innovation down? I would disagree with that: The computer industry has shown time and time again that it is the little guy with barely a cent to his name that comes through with the next big, multi-billion dollar idea. Indeed, software is probably the least capital intensive industry. This is compounded by the fact that the most "capital intensive" aspect of software development, manpower, is that much cheaper in the developing world. I'd have expected that the Microsoft's and Oracle's of the world would have been long been destroyed by the apparently super intelligent and super worth ethic developing world.

    45. Re:Sux it down Sun... by Oinos · · Score: 1

      and certainly with blow-job-billy American jobs were being protected and no one hired H1-Bs.

      Let's not get ahead of ourselves here. Clinton doubled the number of H-1B Visas allowed in the country during the dot-com rage. If you're going to complain about jobs going to H-1B Visa holders, you have to put at least part of that blame on him.

    46. Re:Sux it down Sun... by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Which turned out to be a failed land deal that the Clintons lost a small fortune in.

      Give it up already. The eternal "investigation" ended with absolutely bupkis. The whole thing was yet another radical-right wing attempt to unseat a sitting president at any cost -- and at taxpayers' expense.

      On the other hand, dozens of Bush and Reagan people went to the pokey. They actually committed crimes.

      But, keep up the lying. If you keep repeating a ball-naked bare-assed lie, it becomes Truth. The last ten years show that the American people will swallow a bowling ball if you maniacally keep calling it a grape.

    47. Re:Sux it down Sun... by crazyphilman · · Score: 1

      DuckDuckBOOM said:

      ">You see, this isn't a social problem, it's an
      >economic one.

      And a political one. This is one of the few areas over which the Constitution explicitly gives Congress authority. Since they've rarely held back in regulating other areas of commerce over which they (arguably) have no authority whatsoever, one has to wonder why they're so reluctant to rein this one in..."

      To which I reply:

      There's no reason to wonder. They're bought and paid for by their corporate masters, who value profit over all and don't care WHAT happens to their community, as long as they can hide in their mansions and yachts.

      They'll be the first ones up against the wall when the revolution comes.

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
    48. Re:Sux it down Sun... by Jason+Earl · · Score: 1

      Applying political bandages to economic problems tends to make matters worse, not better. The government could certainly try to set up protections for the U.S. software market, but all that would do is guarantee that American companies paid more for their software. That might help American coders (in the short run), but it would hurt everyone else. What's more it would likely accelerate the creation of foreign software companies. So Sun, IBM, and Microsoft wouldn't be able to hire foreign coders, but Wipro, SAP, and the rest of the world would. In the end American software would be less competitive and we would lose these jobs anyhow. More importantly we would lose control over the entire industry, and the rest of the American economy would end up paying higher prices for software.

      If anything we should simply make it easy for talented hackers from all over the world to move to the U.S with no strings attached. Indian nationals living in the U.S. have all of the same expenses that I do. Indians living in Calcuta have a much lower cost of living.

      The reason that government hasn't been willing to "rein this one in" is that they have learned from experience that regulating trade always works out to the detriment of the economy. They still do it when the issue becomes a hot political issue, but they don't like it.

    49. Re:Sux it down Sun... by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      You see, this isn't a social problem, it's an economic one. Talented Indian workers are willing to work for less than American workers.

      Talent's got nothing to do with it. I've worked with H-1Bs and only a few have been talented. Management can't tell a good coder from a bad one, and they can't understand any coder or what they do, American or foreign. So they like to think IT people are widgets, and a cheap widget is better because more money goes into management bonuses - until the company tanks because it needs twice as many widgets. Got it?

    50. Re:Sux it down Sun... by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      If they are not hiring american workers then let them move their asses over seas. Then they can get import tariffs placed on all their goods and we can start buying products from and American company with American staff.

      Agreed, as long as the companies have to move their headquarters and top management out of the country also. The problem is, the managers will claim they ARE hiring American residents . . . for the mail room and as janitors -- just not IT work. I think I'm beginning to understand Dilbert's garbage man character.

    51. Re:Sux it down Sun... by humblecoder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Jason:

      I agree with your lassez-faire logic, but I believe that you have reached a faulty conclusion. It was government intervention that caused the H1-B "problem" in the first place. What US workers are asking for is not "protection" for themselves, but for the removal of what is, in effect, a government subsidy to big business.

      The H1-B visa program actually disrupts the normal rules of supply and demand. Because it makes it difficult for H1-B workers to switch jobs, they have no leverage with which to negotiate their salary and benefits. Because of this, they are forced to accept below market pay. One "free market" solution would be to allow visa holders the freedom to move from job to job. Companies in return will be forced to pay H1-B workers the market wage, thus eliminating the "subsidy" that companies are given by the government's enactment of this program.

      On a related note, I do not think that offshore development is going to take off the way that everyone thinks that it is. As demand for Indian programmers increases, they will demand high wages, thus eliminating the cost savings. Already you hear complaints from Indian shops that they now have to compete with lower cost countries like Vietnam and China. Eventually, costs in these places will be bid up as demand grows. Also, a lot of tech workers in these third world countries are going to want to move to the US and other high standard-of-living countries, depleting the third-world of its tech workers. In a sense, the H1-B visa program actually works AGAINST offshore development, since it depletes the employment pool in these third world countries.

    52. Re:Sux it down Sun... by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Damn! Excellent rant.

    53. Re:Sux it down Sun... by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      If I hadn't already posted here (a number of times) I'd mod that up. It has become more and more obvious recently that American corporate management is only concerned with American corporate management. They insist that employees attend ethics training while they're being replaced by foreign workers (who haven't attended the ethics training). That's the MBA approach to business ethics.

    54. Re:Sux it down Sun... by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      software is probably the least capital intensive industry.

      This is true, but two of the four companies cited are Intel and Sun. Competing with either requires great capital.

      While software development is relatively cheap, software marketing is just as expensive. It's very difficult to build a trusted brand name, regardless of technical prowess. American software companies have a large domestic market, and many smaller foreign markets. An Indian company would have a relatively small domestic market, and have to try to break into an American market, which is obviously that much harder. You'll also have to contend with a local market where copyright infringement is the norm, and Microsoft products are "freely" available. We're talking about a company that stared down the US government here, so how do you think investors will respond if your business plan involves defeating Microsoft? Mass marketing requires lots of money.

      As for Oracle, their customers are even more cautious than Microsoft's. Can you imagine what will happen to a manager who picks the cheaper DBMS that turns out to perform poorly? Unless you can show massive capital behind you, you will not get the trust (how long will you even be around to support us?) needed to succeed in this market. Credibility is purchased with money here.

      Don't even look beyond the borders. Apple has billions of dollars in cash, and, to put it mildly, a technically sound OS. IBM and Oracle have been spending heavily promoting Linux. Who's still installed on nine out of ten computers shipped?

      However, the question is not completely off-base. It's silly to ask why India or China hasn't produced a Microsoft or an Intel, because of the relative lack of capital. A valid question might be why they haven't produced an id Software, or even lots of shareware hits. One possible reason might be that many of the most enterprising young talents are lured by superior pay, working for US companies. Again, money.

    55. Re:Sux it down Sun... by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Given that reality, how some people can blame the Republicans just goes to show how blind people can be when they want to be.

      I don't want to get into a Democrat vs Republican thing because it's bigger than that. Neither party is willing to stand up for American IT workers, and neither party has been willing to fund enforcement of the H-1B regulations.

      There was a provision in the H-1B bill that required companies using H-1Bs to contribute money to retrain displaced American workers. Bush decided that wasn't working and dismantled it. That was just adding insult to injury. It's quite obvious that politicians care only about themselves and how much they can skim from *contributors* regardless of party.

    56. Re:Sux it down Sun... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, the question is not completely off-base. It's silly to ask why India or China hasn't produced a Microsoft or an Intel, because of the relative lack of capital. A valid question might be why they haven't produced an id Software, or even lots of shareware hits. One possible reason might be that many of the most enterprising young talents are lured by superior pay, working for US companies. Again, money.

      Its not money when it comes to producing free software. How much money did Linus Torvalds make when he was developing his kernel in 1991 ? Or Stallman for that matter working at MIT ? Its about a cultural factor, called dedication to produce something that will preserve the independence and freedom of the developers and users. This attitude (love for freedom) is just not present in third world countries. The hundreds of thousands of programmers produced in these countries (like India and China) are paid laborers who would do the job (that pays them), then go home to eat and watch stupid movies. They are like paid robots, unlike principled and zealous free-software developers (who code in their spare time). In recent times though China has made significant contributions with free-software (redflag linux, a product of collaboration between Chinese universities and the Chinese govt). Its become significant enough that VIA supplies drivers for it ( http://www.viaarena.com/?PageID=182 ). When it comes to India, the less said the better.

    57. Re:Sux it down Sun... by mixmasta · · Score: 1

      while I don't necessarily disagree, I think you have forgotten that most corps are multinational these days.

      Prolly take coordinated action at the UN/NATO level to stick it to 'em.

      --
      #6495ED - cornflower blue
    58. Re:Sux it down Sun... by syd02 · · Score: 1

      While I would never argue that every Indian can code, I will say that the percentages are in their favor. I bet you've known many more untalented Americans than talented ones.

      Oh, and if you're looking for an ex-con, hire a black man. I just say that so that you know not to take me too seriously on this train of thought.

    59. Re:Sux it down Sun... by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      Being punished? Who's being punished, besides the typical American stockholder?

      Ok... And remind me... What exactly did Clinton do to help the situation?

      At best you're saying that Democrats are as bad as Republicans. But there's certainly no evidence to suggest Republicans are any worse. It's just more politically correct and funner to pick on big old bad Republicans.

    60. Re:Sux it down Sun... by imaniack · · Score: 1

      Corporations have one big soft belly: it's greedy.

    61. Re:Sux it down Sun... by JimFromJersey · · Score: 1

      You silly person, I was being sarcastic.

      --
      between the greater and lesser infinities sleep the dreams undreamt
    62. Re:Sux it down Sun... by Timex · · Score: 1

      They are under legal obligation to follow certain rules (one of them being to hire a US worker instead of an H1-B worker if a US worker is available for the job)

      ...which results in completely unrealistic experience requirements (like the minimum four years experience managing Windows XP systems spot I saw recently!).... The HR dweeb then argues they can't find anyone to fit the bill, gets clearance to hire H1-B drones, and takes the first reasonable import s/he can find. The American Geek that got laid off suffers 'cause he can't get a job, while Corporate America gets to bring more people in from off-shore just to save a buck.

      The bastards.
      Granted, this isn't the rule, but it happens often enough to be a prime candidate for one.

      --
      When politicians are involved, everyone loses.
    63. Re:Sux it down Sun... by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Where are you going with that? I never mentioned race, just H-1B holders. And, IIRC, Indians are caucasians. There are H-1Bs from countries other than India, including Canada, Russia, China, etc.

      To repeat, the H-1Bs I've worked with have not been above average in talent, so according to the regulations, they should not be here.

    64. Re:Sux it down Sun... by syd02 · · Score: 1

      It was a light-hearted jab at my fellow American IT "professionals". It's one thing to be an average or below-average coder. What's been depressing me lately are the numbers of total frauds that pass themselves off as technologists. I'm starting to think that in most brick and mortar companies the best strategy for making money is to pretend that you know absolutely nothing about the implementation side of things and just use a lot of buzzwords. That way, your biased boss will decide to put you in charge of the "geeks".

    65. Re:Sux it down Sun... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      They'll be the first ones up against the wall when the revolution comes.

      Yes! There is a big billboard advertising the company that I work for right outside our companys gate. I frequently imagine the corporate big-wigs hanging by their necks from it while I drink champagne and fire my Kalishnikov into the air!

      Yuppicide! Kill the rich!
      No war but the Cl@ss W@r!!!

  3. Unlikely by saikou · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One of the suits already got dismissed.
    If, on the other hand, Sun looses this one, then bye bye US jobs and hello nice fat contract for Sun India. Which would be even worse.

  4. For us non-US'ians what is H1-B? by rf0 · · Score: 1, Informative

    What is H1-B? Is this the Visa that allows foriegn nationals to work in the US in high tech jobs?

    rus

    1. Re:For us non-US'ians what is H1-B? by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes.

      It was originally intended to allow employers to fill jobs when they cannot find legal residents to fill them.

      To be able to use this, the employer must certify that they not only are unable to find an employee who is a legal resident. They are also supposed to certify that no terminations would happen to the non-H1b employees because of this hire (ie. termination/layoffs shortly after).

    2. Re:For us non-US'ians what is H1-B? by arpit · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's right. This is the visa category under which a company can sponsor a foreign worker to work in a US based firm. This category is only for "skilled" labor.

      The visa is typically valid for three years and renewable for only three more years after that. By that time if you haven't managed to complete your green card (permanent resident card) processing you have to leave the country - though I believe nowadays H1B visas can be extended beyond the usual 6 years in increments of one year provided your green card processing is in an advanced stage. I've been working on an H1B myself for the last 4 years.

    3. Re:For us non-US'ians what is H1-B? by bublina · · Score: 1

      H1-B is a temporary work visa. It is given to foreigners seeking work in their fields. The company must sponsor you for this visa and demonstrate that you are not replacing an American citizen equally qualified for the job.

    4. Re:For us non-US'ians what is H1-B? by ekephart · · Score: 1

      More or less, yes.

      "What is an H-1B?

      The H-1B is a nonimmigrant classification used by an alien who will be employed temporarily in a specialty occupation or as a fashion model of distinguished merit and ability."


      Here's more.

      --
      sig
    5. Re:For us non-US'ians what is H1-B? by PD · · Score: 1

      I would expect that non-US'ians as you call them would know more about H1-B than US'ians. And yes, you guessed right.

    6. Re:For us non-US'ians what is H1-B? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a link on h1-b. In short, H1-B is an expanded guest worker program for tech workers. Most H1-Bs are young men from India. Supporters say "It's good for business : lower labor costs for owners of capital ". American tech workers say "Why pick on us : lower wages for labor."

    7. Re:For us non-US'ians what is H1-B? by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Looks like they fucked the 2nd part up to me.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    8. Re:For us non-US'ians what is H1-B? by brickbat · · Score: 1

      What is H1-B? Is this the Visa that allows foriegn nationals to work in the US in high tech jobs?

      Yes. To be precise, "specialty occupations," which also includes fashion models!

      I'm not sure how long H1-B has been available, but at the beginning of the tech boom it became a convenient way to staff high-demand technical positions for which there were insufficient domestic workers. I think the U.S. wanted to avoid some of the problems Japan faced, where a severe shortage of labor led to their later economic troubles.

    9. Re:For us non-US'ians what is H1-B? by mcmonkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "The H-1B visa allows a professional worker from abroad to be employed by a U.S. employer" with a couple caveats. It requires workers be paid prevailing wages, so it shouldn't be used as a tool to get cheap workers. It's a temporary visa--it's not meant to permanently replace citizen employees.

      And most importantly, it's meant to fill positions for which qualified legal workers are not available. If the Rolling Stones want to tour the USA, sure, let 'em in. No one here does quite what they do. However if a company is not only laying off workers and replacing them with folks with H1-Bs, but also not paying them the prevailing wages citizens get, that company is breaking both the spirit an the letter of the law.

      In the end this case boils down to who has the better lawyer. Sun has already had similar suits dismissed.

    10. Re:For us non-US'ians what is H1-B? by ADRA · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If in fact Sun did this activity in a dubious manner, then it would still not apply to the second point, since it fired their employees before seeking new hires.

      Plus, to assume that Sun prejudiced themselves based on the info given in the article is very weak. I haven't heard of any ppl getting turned down when they were hiring again. Did nobody apply, or what?

      And about Sun not hiring back oild employees, hello! They were chosen as being sub-standard employees! Why would you hire them back?

      --
      Bye!
    11. Re:For us non-US'ians what is H1-B? by bublina · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think the prevailing wage issue is an important point. The department of labor has complicated tables to calculate this. In order to be granted an H1-B, you MUST be paid at least the prevailing wage, else the INS will not grant you the visa. The wages are calculated based on what an equally qualified Americans in your jobs get paid on average, to ensure that foreign workers on H1-Bs are not underpaid.

    12. Re:For us non-US'ians what is H1-B? by mgs1000 · · Score: 1

      And they usually demonstrate this by placing a job ad in the newspaper with impossibly high requirements(usually coupled with outrageously low salary), so they can say that no citizen was "qualified" for the job. All of you out-of-work techies are probably all to familiar with these job postings.

    13. Re:For us non-US'ians what is H1-B? by w1r3sp33d · · Score: 1

      Question for you, do you think that the H1B has effectively solved the problem of the IT gap? I feel that I am in job competition with the world, which is good for everyone once you reach a high level in the industry. My concern is for people like my nephew who is having a hard time getting an entry level job in the field. In your experience have you seen people on the H1B's in these lower skillset positions?

    14. Re:For us non-US'ians what is H1-B? by chiller2 · · Score: 1
      H-1B is a non immigrant worker visa. In short, it allows non US citizens to work in the US to fill positions where a local job candidate could not be sourced.

      The company wishing to hire the non US worker files a petition for an H-1B visa with the INS (Immigration and Naturalization Service). Once the visa is processed, the worker can start working.

      There are certain restrictions to this visa...
      1. The worker can only work for the company petitioning them.
      2. The H-1B visa lasts 3 years. It can be renewed once, giving a maximum of 6 years in which the worker is allowed to reside in the US.
      3. The worker must leave the US within 10 days of either the H-1B expiring or the petitioning company being unable/unwilling to continue their employment. If the worker chooses to stay they become an illegal immigrant and risk deportation and banned re-entry to the US.

      The petitioning company is expected to pay them the salary they would pay a normal US worker. If the company fails on their obligations they are fined by the INS.
      --
      --- Commission free trading & free stock up to $500 - use http://share.robinhood.com/kelvinp6 :)
    15. Re:For us non-US'ians what is H1-B? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you didn't read the article clearly enough. It states that each department had to lay off a certain percentage of people. If you have 20 people in your department, and you have one or two supestars, and another 18 who are pretty much all relatively equivlent in skills, you still had to get rid of 10% (or whatever number) of them. Even if thay weren't really what you would consider substandard for the job at hand, you had to cut x number of heads.

      That doesn't mean all those let go were really sub-standard, or wouldn't have been even better qualified for the different jobs they were applying for.

    16. Re:For us non-US'ians what is H1-B? by Probashi · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wrong! When we hired a H1B couple years back (when our company was still in the position to hire :(), we looked high and low for people with the right skills. Oh, we got stacks of applications and the salary advertised was above the market rate. I had had quite a few phone interviews where the job seekers are asking for fat salaries without having the prerequisite skills. One person I interviewed put down NFS and autofs in his resume. When asked how do you mount a NFS partition his answer was that another group does that, he only knows what it is about. This guy was asking for 85K/year, way above the market rate with a skillset way below the requirement. We ended up hiring an Australian with very good experience, great skill sets and superb work ethics for that position for the same amount of money. So, we did not end up getting cheap labour, but a better worker.

      It is not the only time I have come across that sort of people. It is hard to get the right people for the right job.

    17. Re:For us non-US'ians what is H1-B? by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      All I'm saying is that they had better hope to $DIETY that they never get put in front of a jury.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    18. Re:For us non-US'ians what is H1-B? by kiwimate · · Score: 1

      And most importantly, it's meant to fill positions for which qualified legal workers are not available. If the Rolling Stones want to tour the USA, sure, let 'em in. No one here does quite what they do.

      Sorry to quibble (well, not really, it's fun), but the Rolling Stones wouldn't get in on an H1-B visa.

      The H1-B is specifically for "Temporary workers: Specialty occupations, DOD workers, fashion models". There's the H1-C -- "Temporary workers: Nurses going to work for up to three years in health professional shortage areas".

      IANAVE (I am not a visa expert), but I imagine the Rolling Stones would be P-1 -- "Athletes and Entertainers: Entertainment groups".

      Alternately, evaluate for yourself on the US Immigration web site.

      All of which is to make a point: namely, there's a lot of talk about the H1-B, but a lot of it is somewhat inaccurate. I'm not singling the parent poster out, as he didn't specifically state the Rolling Stones would get in on an H1-B; I just used his comment as a nice segue.

    19. Re:For us non-US'ians what is H1-B? by Gnank · · Score: 1

      Companies do have to pay the "prevailing" wage to H-1B workers, but only what is prevailing in the industry in an area, *not* what is prevailing for Sun. So that's why H-1B workers are cheaper for many employers.

      The H-1B has nothing to do with whether qualified U.S. workers are available, and employers do not have to prove anything related to that. Many (maybe most) H-1B workers are in the process of getting a green card (permanent residence) by means of a "labor certification" and for that the employer must prove that they couldn't find enough qualified U.S. workers for a particular job. But the labor certification is a totally separate thing from the H-1B visa.
    20. Re:For us non-US'ians what is H1-B? by banzai51 · · Score: 1

      So you interviewed one guy who didn't fit your criteria and that is the US as a whole? Maybe you didn't look in the right places. I can't count how many times I run accross BS job postings. Example: 15+ years of web development required. Companies view H1Bs as cheaper alternatives, not only because they won't pay them as much but because: the visa holder can't find/get another job without first leaving the country, they typically won't see a raise, and are completely expendible with little legal recourse.

    21. Re:For us non-US'ians what is H1-B? by tetranz · · Score: 1

      To be able to use this, the employer must certify that they not only are unable to find an employee who is a legal resident.

      Wrong! I think you are getting confused with employer sponsored permanent residency (ie commonly called green card). This requirement does not apply to H1-B.

    22. Re:For us non-US'ians what is H1-B? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't believe the article said that the H1-B workers weren't getting paid the prevailing wage, it mereley said that they were paid LESS than the workers leaving. If Sun is firing predominately older workers (the plaintiff was 52) and hiring younger workers, the younger workers will have a lower salary! For all we know thw H1-B workers were paid very well for their age/experience level.

    23. Re:For us non-US'ians what is H1-B? by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      I think the prevailing wage issue is an important point. The department of labor has complicated tables to calculate this. In order to be granted an H1-B, you MUST be paid at least the prevailing wage, else the INS will not grant you the visa.

      Where'd you come up with that? The companies doing the hiring are allowed to determine the "prevailing wage" as well as play name games with position titles. There have been several studies showing many H-1Bs make up to 30 percent less than American resident workers for the same job.

    24. Re:For us non-US'ians what is H1-B? by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      The petitioning company is expected to pay them the salary they would pay a normal US worker. If the company fails on their obligations they are fined by the INS.

      Funny. Neither the Clinton or Bush administration has ever provided funding for enforcement of the H-1B reguations, and the companies know it. And anyone who thinks the INS could ever catch a wrongdoer hasn't read the news in years.

    25. Re:For us non-US'ians what is H1-B? by chiller2 · · Score: 1

      vsprintf wrote...
      "Funny. Neither the Clinton or Bush administration has ever provided funding for enforcement of the H-1B reguations, and the companies know it. And anyone who thinks the INS could ever catch a wrongdoer hasn't read the news in years."

      I totally agree. My post was to explain what an H-1B was supposed to be. If I were to write about all the problems with it the post would have been considerably longer :)

      --
      --- Commission free trading & free stock up to $500 - use http://share.robinhood.com/kelvinp6 :)
    26. Re:For us non-US'ians what is H1-B? by ADRA · · Score: 1

      More like $(($DEITY+1))

      --
      Bye!
    27. Re:For us non-US'ians what is H1-B? by Probashi · · Score: 1

      No, I did not interview just one person. I gave an example. I have interviewed many many people over the last 8 years and have come across good ones and a lot of bad ones. Neither the US citizens nor the H1Bs have any monopoly over either being good or bad.

    28. Re:For us non-US'ians what is H1-B? by bublina · · Score: 1

      You are quite wrong. Companies are required to pay a prevailing wage. This wage is sometimes more than they want to be paying for that position! Also, there is additional cost associated with obtaining the visa, most of which must leagally be paid by the sponsor (ie, the company, not the foreign worker). And they are also required to cover the cost of transportation for the person back into their home country if/when they let them go.

      This is NOT a cheap labor option - companies do this only if they very much want those individuals because of their exceptional skills.

    29. Re:For us non-US'ians what is H1-B? by Jasper+Dillon · · Score: 1

      An H1-B is something that is seemingly impossible for a foreigner to get unless they're from that 'sort of culture' where they're generally applied to, at least thats the way it seems to me. I've been going to the East Coast of the US for nearly 2 years now, getting in touch with as many companies as possible, networking, all the usual things. I have yet to have a single positive result, even anything close, of *over* 2 years of applications. I'm a recent british university graduate, who, (hopefully, and certainly my current/past employers have said) is well skilled above and beyond the norm...but all that does me no good it seems in my desire to work in the US for the start of my career. As for cheap labour? Yes, I don't believe I need $60k/yr to live. I've applied for jobs that pay $60k/yr in the US, where the equivalent pay in the UK would be half that, and you'd still be relatively happy. The whole 'poverty line' aspect of it all amuses me, what america would call poverty other people in developed countries would call normal. But, I guess if I want to work in the US, and the only way I can is via an H1-B - I have to get the median wage. I can't sell myself cheaply to help get a job...

    30. Re:For us non-US'ians what is H1-B? by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the clarification.

  5. Illegal???? by Bob+Abooey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is this illegal? Isn't that sort of the way business has been done for a million years now? (letting go of expensive help and hiring cheaper help) It's not like the auto industry hasn't been doing this for years by building plants in other countries to take advantage of their cheap labor.

    I have to wonder if the USian labor force isn't partly to blame by pricing themselves out of the market.

    --

    All the best,
    --Bob

    1. Re:Illegal???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is illegal to lay off workers only to replace them with other newly hired workers to do the same job. Layoffs are because the job position is being eliminated -- you cannot replace that job position for a certain period of time (I can't remember - is it six months or a year?)

    2. Re:Illegal???? by Blaine+Hilton · · Score: 1

      I believe this is a major issue with the steel industry also. The unions have worked to get these high paying jobs that require no skill. As long as you can breathe you have a $30 an hour job with full benefits and a fat pension after 30 years. Now if you go to China its $2 a day per person. That may seem awful, but $2 a day there goes much further then here. They are glad to have those jobs. Here work ethic is so low. People expect to do nothing and recieve a high paycheck.

    3. Re:Illegal???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I have to wonder if the USian labor force isn't partly to blame by pricing themselves out of the market."

      To some extent, maybe...but what it comes down to is people need a living wage. But is sounds like to me Sun is taking advantage of a law that was meant to help the tech companies hire foregin labor because there is not enough local labor. When Sun does something like this, it is obviously doing this to save money, which they have a right to do but they also have a social responsibility to obey the spirit of the law and to not take advantage of such programs. In then end, it helps no one as they are stuck having to get new engineers every year or so (when the visa runs out) and they have lost a lot of trust among their current employees. They appear to be taking the short sighted approach to save a couple dollars which often will hurt them in the long run.

      Then again, perhaps this is more evidence the tech industry should unionize to prevent things like this.

      Maybe American tech workers need to expect to make a bit less, at least in this bad economy as well. But they should also expect to work regular days then as well.

      Also, as many people may worry about this trend, I wouldn't worry too much, if you are good at what you do then you will always be in demand. I've seen people actually get higher, better paying positions, because they were talanted American engineers and were promoted above a H1-B worker, because they were American.

    4. Re:Illegal???? by outsider007 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Isn't that sort of the way business has been done for a million years now? (letting go of expensive help and hiring cheaper help)

      yes but if your cheaper help is an immigrant who is here under false pretenses, you just might be going to jail.

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    5. Re:Illegal???? by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Complete FUD. American workers work longer than anyone in the industrialized world. Of course this presents a problem, as corporations want to have an excuse to go elsewhere for cheaper labor, so this idiotic rumor has risen. It has completely no basis in reality.

    6. Re:Illegal???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Illegal? Probably not. We'll see what happens in court.

      Slimy, immoral, unethical, sleazy, low down, dirty rotten, etc. For sure, especially after the "debate" we had when Sun et al wanted to expand the number of H1B visas a while back. There was only one side to lobby/pay congress so they said "Sure!"

    7. Re:Illegal???? by arkanes · · Score: 1

      That may very well be true, but the parent is talking about moving work to non-industrial nations (I don't think he really meant China), or at least nations who's industry consists mainly of foreign plants. Anyway, it doesn't really matter if they work longer shifts if you can get more shits for a hundredth the cost.

    8. Re:Illegal???? by infinite9 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Is this illegal?

      Yes.

      Isn't that sort of the way business has been done for a million years now?

      Yes.

      It's not like the auto industry hasn't been doing this for years by building plants in other countries to take advantage of their cheap labor.

      It's exactly the same thing. Except that now it's white collar jobs that are leaving. A better analogy would be like Ford firing all the factory workers and importing Mexicans to have them work in factories here, but paying them half. They can't do that though. It's illegal. They don't have an h1-b program because anyone can be trained to be an auto worker. So they moved the factories elsewhere. Ultimately, that's what will happen to IT. So it's a losing battle. I plan to get out of IT.

      Unfortunately, IT workers don't have a labor union or trade organization to defend us. Doctors are numerous all over the world. Why don't they come here and charge half? Because of the AMA. It's extremely difficult to get your medical training in another country, then come here and practise medicine. IT workers require no licensing, have no organization, and can be trained anywhere. Hindsight is 20/20. It was sort of inevitable.

      I have to wonder if the USian labor force isn't partly to blame by pricing themselves out of the market.

      This is more like shit happens. IT workers don't set the rates. Wouldn't they make it higher now if they could? The rates are set by the market.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    9. Re:Illegal???? by malfunct · · Score: 1
      Yes, its 100% illegal. The H1-B visa is a temporary visa that was created to allow high tech companies import workers when no US worker can fill the same job and no US worker would be layed off to allow that position. If the company is laying people off they are breaking the law surrounding the H1-B visa. I am not sure what the punishement is but I think that the foreign worker should have thier visa revoked because the conditions of the visa were broken. Every single american that wants a job in the computer industry in america should really know how this visa works and desire that it be followed.

      The disadvantage is that if US workers want too much salary the company may move outside the US but I don't think that is reason to change how the visa system works. I've been very concerned for quite a while that the US companies import foreign workers, and then train them on building our technology. Its a surprise to me that more overseas companies haven't produced competing products at much lower prices.

      --

      "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

    10. Re:Illegal???? by hiryuu · · Score: 1

      Complete FUD. American workers work longer than anyone in the industrialized world. Of course this presents a problem, as corporations want to have an excuse to go elsewhere for cheaper labor, so this idiotic rumor has risen. It has completely no basis in reality.

      Source for statistics? I'm not voicing disbelief, just curiousity and interest in the numbers.

      --
      Karma: Excellent, but still won't get you laid.
    11. Re:Illegal???? by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

      Yes this is illegal and no it is not the same as building a plant overseas. Let me explain.

      These Visas are supposed to be used to bring in people when no one can be found in the domestic pool to do the job and no one is supposed to be laid off or fired to bring them in. Now you can argue whether that should be the law or not but the fact here is that that is the law and if what is being said is correct Sun broke that law.

      The reason this is not the same as going offshore is because compared to going offshore the risk/costs for the company are much less. If companies want to use cheap overseas labor they have every right to do so but they should be forced to take the risks associated with that and when those risks are brought in it often is *not* less expensive. That is why, IMO, they should not be allowed to use cheap labor with none of the risks. Basiclly paying US labor costs is part of the cost of doing business here and is one of the things that makes it so attractive to do so. So yes it is illegal there is no argument there. I think it should be illegal but you can argue that point.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    12. Re:Illegal???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      American workers work longer than anyone in the industrialized world.

      Exactly. If they could get the work done as quickly as workers in other countries then they wouldn't be in this mess.

    13. Re:Illegal???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, in Soviet Russia, maybe. Not here.

    14. Re:Illegal???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen people actually get higher, better paying positions, because they were talanted American engineers and were promoted above a H1-B worker, because they were American.

      Yep, we can always rely on racism to save us.

    15. Re:Illegal???? by CrypticOutsider · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I have to wonder if the USian labor force isn't partly to blame by pricing themselves out of the market.

      The blame game is always fun. Think of a classic resource depletion example. Overfishing. You're in a small village. There are only a certain amount of fish. If you gather enough fish to live comfortably and everyone else does the same, then everyone lives happily ever after. If you overfish, then you reap great short term profits, but everyone starves in the long run.

      But even if you got really whacky and assumed that individual people could all prevent this from happening by taking less pay for their work (and one thing you learn very quickly is that people defect much more than you'd expect with no controls) this still isn't a resource depletion, as the companies were making lots of (albeit paper) money. So blame the stock market, the system which encourage short term gain (b/c you can just flip) and people to fudge reports etc.

      Doctors and lawyers are safe, because there's such a high barrier to entry (you can't practice law until you pass the bar, and you need med school/residency/etc), but there's little of that in the tech industry. In fact I'd argue that it's easier to start from scratch to be able to convince someone who's not tech savvy that you have skills in software development than it is a trade (carpentry, construction, welding, etc).

      And vendor based certifications aren't the answer.

    16. Re:Illegal???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not compete FUD. Americans do get less vacation days than those in Europe, but other parts of the world are a different matter entirely.

      I have friends who are in the steel industry (and who's parents have had those union jobs for years. I've heard LOTS of tails of people taking naps while on the clock, sitting around playing cards while on the clock, etc. The Unions were desparatly needed at one time to prevent abuse by employers, but these days the unions often seem to be doing a very large chunck of the abuse of the system themselves.

      I know lots of folks at those companies who work damn hard, but there are a lot of others I know who milk the system like crazy, bringing down the productivity. The unions protect them from everything.

    17. Re:Illegal???? by banzai51 · · Score: 1

      Don't have sources but please explain why Japanese and German car companies now open new plants in the US? The stats from these factories bare out that US workers build at higher quality and higher output. The Japanese had a lot of fun picking apart the "American Worker" but that was really a jab at American Management. So when American companies move plants outside of the US and claim quality and UAW as reasons, they are lying through their teeth. They simply want the cheapest labor they can find regardless of quality.

    18. Re:Illegal???? by ktambascio · · Score: 1

      How about

      http://www.clev.frb.org/research/com/090196.htm

      and

      http://www.cepr.net/give_me_a_break.htm

    19. Re:Illegal???? by Eccles · · Score: 1

      Source for statistics? I'm not voicing disbelief, just curiousity and interest in the numbers.

      I'm not the original poster, but look at this.
      Quote from it: "Workers in the United States are putting in more hours than anyone else in the industrialized world."

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    20. Re:Illegal???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think a better analogy would be to engineers, seeing as how producing computer software is engineering...but then I'm not looking at "IT workers", just programmers.

      The real problem is that there is no accountability in software engineering. If you screw up, there really aren't any ramifications. In this type of situation, managers are going to drive the cost of development as low as they possible can, because the risk of failure is quite low. This means farming off development to whatever software sweatshop they can. Security/maintainability/correctness etc. come to mean next to nothing.

      So the question becomes, how do we fix this(if you want the easy way, don't really care about the industry, etc. then the question is of course what field you should move into). In my opinion, software engineering needs to be turned into a profession. More specifically, I think that we should start licensing developers. This has the added benefit of separating the wheat from the chaffe, so to speak. Currently the only way, for people to determine qualifications of potential job candidates, is by reviewing experience, and schooling. Neither of these turn out to be good indicators of competance.

    21. Re:Illegal???? by RatBastard · · Score: 1
      I have to wonder if the USian labor force isn't partly to blame by pricing themselves out of the market.

      IT worker's setting rates too high? I earn what my employer is willing to pay me. That's teh case for most non-union workers. You take the best paying job you can get, but ultimately it is teh employer who sets the wage you will earn.

      I suppose you'll tell me it's my fault that someone broke into my locked garage and stole some of my possessions.

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    22. Re:Illegal???? by rkischuk · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It's not like the auto industry hasn't been doing this for years by building plants in other countries to take advantage of their cheap labor.

      It's not at all the same thing. The equivalent is software shops that outsource their development to a foreign contractor or subsidiary. Even then, the cars are subject to significant transport costs and import tariffs. Neither of these constraints apply to software.
      I have to wonder if the USian labor force isn't partly to blame by pricing themselves out of the market.

      What a cheap attempt to reshape the argument. The core of this issue here is the enforcement and abuse of an existing US law. Most anyone still in technology today could probably share several anecdotal stories of abuse of the visa system. We have every right to expect our government to enforce our laws to protect our citizens. Sadly, political donations often trump the rule of law, and often reshape the law.

      If/when the H1-B visa system is corrected to reflect its legal mandate, then a different discussion will ensue, one which will reflect the actual going market rate and answer your pricing question. The result would be either:
      1. Near full employment for US citizens with highly-needed skills - in this case, the market rate for these employees would probably actually rise, and H1-B would be use to fill the gaps, as is the intent.
      2. A new debate begins for companies - outsource, or build here? There are inherent disadvantages to overseas development - building software is very communications intensive - unclear or misunderstood requirements and miscues can have tragic effects on a project. Discussions can rarely be held face-to-face, and conference calls require at least one side of the ocean to participate outside of normal work hours. With the current H1-B environment, fewer companies feel the need to consider this option. A debate over import tariffs on foreign-developed code would likely ensue.

      Either one of these outcomes is a welcome change from the status quo. It's simply speculation to base market conclusions on the existing environment of fraud.
      --
      Seen any BadMarketing lately?
    23. Re:Illegal???? by peaworth · · Score: 1

      I have anedotal evidence. I have direct experience with individuals (engineers) in Europe, specifically Belgium and Germany. I believe that the work week is set at something like 37 hours, and you can get in trouble for working more than that.

      I believe that the thought process is that if you need to have people working "overtime", you had better hire another person.

      It was my impression it was the same for some other countries as well, such as France.

    24. Re:Illegal???? by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Here's one article on it.

    25. Re:Illegal???? by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Actually, the parent post said that Americans have lost their work ethic, which is blatantly untrue.

    26. Re:Illegal???? by halo8 · · Score: 1

      Fucking Eh Man

      I worked at Compaq before HP bought them out and moved our call center of 700ppl to India.
      Im In Canada, and no offence to americans, but after spending 3 years In a Canadian call center supporting Americans.. i know how much americans dont like talking to ppl with diffrent accents.

      And your right.. the Auto Companies got smart they moved elsewhere,
      The IT workers on the other hand got dumber cause we havent unionized
      i say your right on the money.. give it time and everything will be in India, China, Mexico ect...

      So if this is free trade.. whats so free about the bread at the food lines?

      --
      The More Knowledge you have the Luckier you Get- J.R. Ewing
    27. Re:Illegal???? by GuNgA-DiN · · Score: 1

      "I have to wonder if the USian labor force isn't partly to blame by pricing themselves out of the market."

      This is probably somewhat true. But, the problem is that houses around me start at $300,000 a year (for a "fixer-upper"). If you want a decent house it will cost you at least $350-500,000. Food is expensive. Electricity is expensive and so is telephone service. You have to receive higher wages just to keep up with the cost of living.

      If there was affordable housing -- maybe we could all take a paycut and survive. But, if I took a paycut right now -- I'd be living in a cardboard box.

    28. Re:Illegal???? by Metroid72 · · Score: 1

      I believe that mentioning the Car industry is a little bit off to do an accurate comparison. These companies HAVE TO minimize exchange currency risk (E.g. Caterpillar VS Komatsu during the 80s)and have complex part/product distribution requirements. Hence moving overseas was needed to continue in business. It's true that in many cases (Mexico) labor is cheaper, BUT this move was needed to stay competitive.

    29. Re:Illegal???? by brre · · Score: 1
      It's extremely difficult to get your medical
      training in another country, then come here
      and practise medicine.


      Yet somehow many manage it.

      A few names from my PPO's in-network physicians list, doctors in my area, just pulled up from PPO website:



      Dr. Massih Ghoddoucy, MD University of Teheran, Iran.



      Dr. A. R. Jayaram, MD Mysort Medical College, India



      Maliha Qadir, MD, King Edward Medical College, Pakistan



      Maignonette Willkom, MD, University of the Philippines.



      David Chee, MD, Burma Medical School



      Nader Kaldas, MD, University of Ein Shames, Cairo, Egypt.



      Calvin Lei, MD, Institute of Medicine, Burma.



      Narendra Malani, MD University of Calcutta.



      Jatinder Marwaha, MD Punjab University



      Looks like somehow doctors from foreign medical colleges are getting in.

    30. Re:Illegal???? by Probashi · · Score: 1


      Once upon a time, there was a shortage of Doctors in the US and Doctors trained in the foreign countries were encouraged to come here and work.

      Same with the pharmacists in the 1970s. During that period, a foreign trained pharmacist could come to US with a green card already issued for him/her.

      That shortage was not too long ago for nurses (not sure if that is still true).

      In the 90s, there was somewhat shortage of tech workers. I know many people on this board don't agree with that. But, if you go and look at the CS or engineering departments, you will see that it is flooded with foreign students. In the graduate dept, it is even worse. So, not enough US citizens were graduating with CS/Engineering degrees. A lot of these foreign students later changed their visa status to H1B. Then came the dot com fiasco along with y2k issue. The need for tech workers increased (but was probably not as much as some thought), H1B quota was increased, foreign workers were brought in directly from abroad with H1B visas. Some contracting firms took advantage of this situation and essentially abused the system. Now, that we have implotion the tech job market, the usage of H1B visa has decreased quite a bit and it is not reaching the yearly quota anymore.

    31. Re:Illegal???? by Rayonic · · Score: 1

      Except that now it's white collar jobs that are leaving.

      You fucking moron. It's not that the jobs are leaving. That would be fair. It's when they stay and are given to non-citizens that pisses me off.

      If a job is physically in the U.S. then you have to employ a U.S. Citizen (or at least someone with a regular green card.)

    32. Re:Illegal???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      housing price increases are directly related to the number of new people entering the housing market. Since Americans aren't making babies at a rapid rate, where did thouse new people come from?

  6. Um... by jmb-d · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How exactly does this fall under the category "Your Rights Online"?

    --
    In walking, just walk. In sitting, just sit. Above all, don't wobble.
    -- Yun-Men
    1. Re:Um... by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Expand it to read

      "Your Rights are On the line"

      The way I see it, if you're a legal resident of the US and are just as skilled as the H1-B candidate, you have the right to first hire.

    2. Re:Um... by intermodal · · Score: 1

      but its listed as Sun, not YRO

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    3. Re:Um... by jmb-d · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The icon is for Sun; the category is YRO... Similarly, the A Slightly-Softer Microsoft Shared Source License story has a Microsoft logo.

      --
      In walking, just walk. In sitting, just sit. Above all, don't wobble.
      -- Yun-Men
    4. Re:Um... by sporty · · Score: 1

      It's about rights. It's slashdot. You are online. duh..

      kidding ;)

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    5. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How exactly does this fall under the category "Your Rights Online"?

      Why exactly do you care?
      Give it up people. I'm sick of hearing this redundant whining.

    6. Re:Um... by eht · · Score: 1

      Then go work for someone who has the same ideas about rights that you do, don't force someone to lose money or in any way conform to your idea about rights, in other words, if you're black, don't demand the KKK hire you

    7. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's not dumbass. The law says (THE LAW) that he must be hired before the H1-B visa person. A company can only use the H1-B visa worker if there is no qualified worker available here.

    8. Re:Um... by Shugart · · Score: 1

      What category should it be under?

      --
      History is so yesterday!
    9. Re:Um... by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 1

      At the risk of -1 Redundant, I'll reiterate what an insightful AC just posted in reply to the parent response, just in case the threshold is set higher than zero on people's account.

      The LAW says that they are to hire the equally qualified legal resident instead of the H1-B. Only when no such candidates are available, then the H1-B can be hired. Wheather you believe the law is wrong or not is an issue you must deal with on your own terms. If a hiring company fails to follow the law, they need to be punished for breaking it.

    10. Re:Um... by eht · · Score: 1

      Fine, among the qualifications I require is that I look to my own bottom line and hire someone cheaper, and I need to increase my non white male employee ratio so I won't be accused of discrimination.

      Why would you ever want to work for someone who doesn't want to hire you.

    11. Re:Um... by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 1

      among the qualifications I require is that I look to my own bottom line and hire someone cheaper, and I need to increase my non white male employee ratio so I won't be accused of discrimination.

      I guess it'll be the lesser of two fines (or lawsuits) which drives your decision to hire. The one for discrimination or the one for unlawful H1-B hiring practices.

      Why would you ever want to work for someone who doesn't want to hire you.

      I'd reject their offer in an instant, if the tech market wasn't so dry as it is these days.

  7. I have no problem with H1B's by tshak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As long as they are compensated and treated the same as Americans. Humans are not a commodity. H1B's generally come from desperate situations so of course they _will_ work for a lot less than Americans, but that doesn't mean that it's ethical to exploit the desperate situation in which they came from.

    --

    There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    1. Re:I have no problem with H1B's by gRa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why should Sun employ foreigners if they were as expensive as the Americans? They have to compete with the Americans and they do it by beeing cheaper. They are willing to do it, since in India they erarned less.

      When you required from Sun to treat them the same as Americans, you would take away the chance for foreigners to become Sun's employees.

      I cannot see, how this would help them from their desperate situation.

    2. Re:I have no problem with H1B's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Humans are not a commodity.

      True. We're not nearly that valuable.

    3. Re:I have no problem with H1B's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm confused. You have no problem with H1B visas as long as they are nothing like H1B visas. I'm having a hard time figuring out where/if you are being sarcastic. My wife complains that I take everything to literally. Sorry.

    4. Re:I have no problem with H1B's by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      That's the point; suddenly it becomes a question of hiring on the merits, rather than hiring the cheapest guys you can find.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    5. Re:I have no problem with H1B's by luzrek · · Score: 1

      H1B workers get paid the same as legal immagrants with the same level of experience. Therefore, they do not have an unfair price point. This is the same as hiring a bunch of young Americans and firing old Americans.

      --

      Galium Arsenide is the material of the future, and always will be.

    6. Re:I have no problem with H1B's by justinbigelow · · Score: 1

      "H1B workers get paid the same as legal immagrants with the same level of experience"

      That is the way it is supposed to work but obviously it does not or else these suits wouldn't even have made it to court (barring the guy that decided to represent himself). And within a job classification there is a wide range of acceptable salaries. You may find one Java developer earning $35 an hour and another earning $120 an hour. Where on that payscale do you think that the majority of H1-B visas end up?

    7. Re:I have no problem with H1B's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are very correct. I am a foreign national student (from India). And I have been working as a web programmer for a good institution for about a year. They said they put in a FTE (full time equivalent) request to the board for my position. Currently paying $18 /hr (started at $14 /hr).

      This job is very important to me, It will enable me to live on my own and maybe even support my family. H1B is a god-send if you ask me. So removing H1B is not a good solution to this whole deal.

      If you ask me they should try and investigate each H1B request and only dismiss the request if absolutely necessary.

    8. Re:I have no problem with H1B's by f97tosc · · Score: 1

      As long as they are compensated and treated the same as Americans. Humans are not a commodity. H1B's generally come from desperate situations so of course they _will_ work for a lot less than Americans, but that doesn't mean that it's ethical to exploit the desperate situation in which they came from.

      Hiring somebody, at lower pay, from a desperate situation is not unethical. The key thing to observe is that such an action is not harming the person being hired; it is helping him or her. Conditions and pay may not be as good as those typical in the US, but they are still better than the desperate person's alternatives (otherwise, he or she would not take the job). The more companies that hire say cheap Indian labor, the better the situation for the Indians. Note that it is never the cheap labor that files suits or complaints about pay, it is those that are threatened by the competition that do.

      For American professionals, I have one thing to say: if you want to have a higher standard of living than everybody else you must continue to be more productive than everybody else. Stopping visas or suing companies that hire people that are willing to work for less is not a lasting solution.

      Tor

    9. Re:I have no problem with H1B's by ADRA · · Score: 1

      1. Could they have been hired for being MORE qualified then their American counterparts? The article did stipulate mostly older people were layed off as the suit stipulates. Could it be the younger more eager foreign workers could be better suited than a domestic equivalent.

      Few people get jumpy until it's their job on the line.

      --
      Bye!
    10. Re:I have no problem with H1B's by sisukapalli1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here are some things I perceive to be misconceptions about H1B's:

      1) H1B's can work for a very low wage
      A) FALSE: The dept of labor has a prescribed minimum wage for H1B's.
      Anecdote: A company that I know had a paycut, but did not cut some of the H1'B salaries because they would then fall under the dept of labor's limit.

      2) H1B's are equivalent to slavery
      A) FALSE: They come on their own wish. They can leave to their country whenever they want to (often much richer, 'cuz the spare money saved here equates a large amount in, say, India).
      For instance, one could live in many parts of India for over a year comfortably with 5 to 10k dollars. So, if someone saved up 100k in a six year job stunt in US, he/she is set for life in a poor country.

      3) H1B's are coming from exploitative conditions
      A) FALSE: Many are highly educated in their countries, often coming from families placed higher in the social/economical hierarchy. The really poor ones in India, for example, are *really* *really* poor.

      4) H1B's fear being sent back to inhumane conditions
      A) FALSE: Many companies in India, for example, are looking for US trained/US experienced employees for handling outsourced projects. The competition may be tough though

    11. Re:I have no problem with H1B's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course when tech workers were making ridiculous salaries, I see no problem hiring people willing to work for less. This is not 1999. Its not exploitation to give people an opportunity.

    12. Re:I have no problem with H1B's by edstromp · · Score: 1

      Ahh but humans ARE a commodity. Take a look at the numbers. There are like 6 billion of us on the planet. And if someone will do it cheaper than you, then that is tough luck.

      Don't get me wrong though. I'm all against loosing our american jobs to india workers. I've already written my reps, and will do so again. But you have to ask, if the business virtue is the bottom line, how can you possibly argue that a $15/hour india worker is a bad deal compared with the $100/hour american worker?

    13. Re:I have no problem with H1B's by nicodaemos · · Score: 1
      Why should Sun employ foreigners if they were as expensive as the Americans? They have to compete with the Americans and they do it by beeing cheaper.

      LOL. Yeah, you're right. I mean, it's not like there's any chance that an H1B worker was actually more qualified than an available American worker.

      <whisper>Right???</whisper>
    14. Re:I have no problem with H1B's by mshiltonj · · Score: 1

      Humans are not a commodity.

      Can you prove that? Can you site corporate activity in the past 25 years that supports this statement?

      [tongue-only-slightly-in-cheek]

    15. Re:I have no problem with H1B's by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      1. Could they have been hired for being MORE qualified then their American counterparts? The article did stipulate mostly older people were layed off as the suit stipulates. Could it be the younger more eager foreign workers could be better suited than a domestic equivalent.

      Now you've hit on another problem: the Indian may be more qualified on paper, but how do you verify all the stuff he claims? Forged credentials are practically a cottage industry in India.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    16. Re:I have no problem with H1B's by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Somebody mod this post up, if only for number 3. It seems to me that most Americans have a significantly skewed perspective on countries outside the USA, and a skewed perspective on where these people are coming from. Since I originally hail from Bangladesh (next to India) I can vouch for the fact that there is a large educated class (not so large as in the US, but significant) that can take advantage of things like the H1-B. H1-B's aren't going to be people at the very top (those would just emigrate outright) and they aren't going to be people at the very bottom (because they can't afford to get the skills and they can't afford to emigrate). In reality, they're likely to be people in what we'd consider the "professional" middle class.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    17. Re:I have no problem with H1B's by dukerobillard · · Score: 1

      Wow, he's talking about capitalism and ethics in the same paragraph. That's kinda strange.

    18. Re:I have no problem with H1B's by blincoln · · Score: 1

      The key thing to observe is that such an action is not harming the person being hired; it is helping him or her.

      Yes, I'm sure that Sun's execs were thinking of how many Indian workers they could improve the situations of when they fired their American employees.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    19. Re:I have no problem with H1B's by luzrek · · Score: 1
      Probably the same place the majority of no-experience domestic programmers end up, the bottom. The big difference is that the H1B workers cannot shop for jobs if they are abused. However, in the current job market for high tech workers, the domestic people really cannot shop around either.

      As much as programmers don't want to admit it, coding is not an especially difficult skill. With enough training almost anyone can do it. That is why there is such a huge glut of "I can program, but cannot do anything else" people. Those people simply cannot expect to continue to demand high salaries. The "programmer" job classification is rapidly becoming similar to the "electrician" or the "plumber" job classification. There is a reasonable amount of training, and the end result is very important, but the workers arn't paid all that well. At the same time, the people with real skills, like electrical engeneers (as opposed to electricians) will continue to be paid well.

      --

      Galium Arsenide is the material of the future, and always will be.

    20. Re:I have no problem with H1B's by naoursla · · Score: 1

      I know of a company that hired an H1B holder because they couldn't find anyone here to work at the low salary they wanted to pay. However, once they got the person on board they were forced to pay fair market value for the person's skills which ended up be more than many of the people at the company make.

      The sad thing is they could easily be hiring Americans for that price instead of importing workers (an paying them more anyway), but the owner is too thrifty to raise wages.

    21. Re:I have no problem with H1B's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > H1B's generally come from desperate situations

      Like those found in Canada?

    22. Re:I have no problem with H1B's by justinbigelow · · Score: 1

      I agree that programming is becoming a trade much like any other. However with programming you need to constantly train yourself or risk obsolesence, in electrical work and plumbing the technology moves at a much slower place (a toliet is a toliet and a breaker is a breaker not much changes year to year). But, have you ever priced a plumber to come and do work in your home? A skilled craftsman will run you about $65-$80 an hour a master electrician is about the same. Thats more than I make doing web app development, maybe I should unclog toilets for a living ;) Justin

    23. Re:I have no problem with H1B's by tshak · · Score: 1

      Because hey, if they were being abused before, if we abuse them less it's OK because they're better off... right?

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    24. Re:I have no problem with H1B's by f97tosc · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm sure that Sun's execs were thinking of how many Indian workers they could improve the situations of when they fired their American employees.

      I am sure they weren't, but neither were the fired American employees.

      Tor

    25. Re:I have no problem with H1B's by tshak · · Score: 1

      What does corporate activity have anything to do with whethor or not humans are a commodity? I'll say yes, corporations generally have been treating humans as a commodity, and I'm saying that this is wrong (ethically, not legally).

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
  8. Hum sounds like quite mild delocalisation by _Eric · · Score: 1

    Could be worse...

    I think you should expect Sun's US branch to shrink and Indian branch to grow accordingly if Sun loses the case.

    Indian enginners are said to be quite good and damn cheep if I recall well.

    As the booming years are away, we can expect tech industry to go down on its costs. Like an other industry would.

    1. Re:Hum sounds like quite mild delocalisation by zootread · · Score: 1

      Indian enginners are said to be quite good and damn cheep if I recall well.

      IAAIE (I am an Indian engineer)

      You're damn right we are good, but we are not cheap. Oh wait, I was born in the United States so I don't really count as an Indian engineer.

      --
      Zoot!
    2. Re:Hum sounds like quite mild delocalisation by hoop33 · · Score: 1

      Indian enginners are said to be quite good . . .

      My experience in the IT workplace (10 years), in the corporate world anyway, is that MOST of the workers are incompetent doofuses, WHEREVER they're from. It may be different at software/engineering shops (I sure hope so), but in Corporate America you find a very few highly skilled people (Indians, Americans, Russians, whatever) and a whole lot of dross.

      National origin seems to have zero impact on one's skills.

    3. Re:Hum sounds like quite mild delocalisation by AB3A · · Score: 1
      National origin seems to have zero impact on one's skills.


      Quite true --however:

      The USA has been a vacuum cleaner for technically capable people around the world. If someone manages to get that all important H1B visa, it's because they're probably from the top 0.1% of the pool available.

      So, yes, I'm sure India has plenty of idiots to go around just as we in the US do. We're merely using our economic power to skim the cream of the crop and bring them here.

      Is that wrong? I think so. If I were living in India, I wouldn't be too happy about all those IIT graduates heading out of the country. It deprives the Indian Society of the benefit of their most capable people and it drives otherwise capable workers of out a job here in the US.

      If only lawyers could become the target of H1-B visas. Then this whole problem would disappear overnight...

      --
      Nearly fifty percent of all graduates come from the bottom half of the class!
    4. Re:Hum sounds like quite mild delocalisation by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Indian enginners are said to be quite good and damn cheep if I recall well.

      My experience and that of other peers is that it is a mixed bag. Just like US citizens, some are good, and some are dultzes. The same clueless HR drones and PHB's select people.

      I think you should expect Sun's US branch to shrink and Indian branch to grow accordingly if Sun loses the case.

      Doesn't make much difference if few of the techies are US citizens anyhow. There will always be a need for some people who can relate to customers and the customer's culture and give them "face time".

    5. Re:Hum sounds like quite mild delocalisation by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      "It deprives the Indian Society of the benefit of their most capable people and it drives otherwise capable workers of out a job here in the US."

      And who gave you the right to force Indians to stay in India if they would prefer to work in another country and that country is willing to let them work there?

    6. Re:Hum sounds like quite mild delocalisation by AB3A · · Score: 1
      The H1-B visa regulations are quite clear that importing fresh graduates in a field where experienced help is available domestially was not what they were intended for.

      Look at it another way: The Indian Government pours lots of tax money and brain trust in to IIT and subsidizes tuition so that almost anyone can afford to go --and a very sizable fraction of these fresh faced graduates just leave the country, never to return.

      I'm not saying these graduates have no right to go; however, the debt they owe to Indian society is not small. I'm surprised the Government of India has done so little to the financial backing of the student tuition to stem the tide.

      --
      Nearly fifty percent of all graduates come from the bottom half of the class!
    7. Re:Hum sounds like quite mild delocalisation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then I might look into getting software from a US company. It is like the car industry, except the Japanese cars and workers don't cost 1/10th of the price.

  9. I would not complain... by Mengoxon · · Score: 1, Troll

    ...if I was a younger, lower-paid engineer from India.
    Think about it this way: for the money you pay an American worker, Sun probably hires two Indian engineers and still makes a profit.
    The two Indian engineers will be able to support many more people and relieve them from poverty whereas the American engineer would probably waste a large part of his money on the unnecessary things in life.
    If you are not a racist and think that Americans are better than Indians, then you should applaud Sun. If you are either a customer or shareholder of Sun then you should also applaud them: they either make more profit or able to sell at lower prices.

    Long live capitalism!

    1. Re:I would not complain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      "whereas the American engineer would probably waste a large part of his money on the unnecessary things in life."

      Doesn't most of Sun's product line fall into this group?

    2. Re:I would not complain... by xchino · · Score: 3, Insightful


      Look at it this way, because we have minimum wage laws in America, and there are none in India, the company can hire out engineers, techs, manual labor, or whatever at a cheaper rate than I can legally compete with. I don't have the option to program for $4 an hour. I agree that it helps impoverished people worldwide, but I don't think American corporations should be allowed to treat foreigners any worse than they treat Americans. I think they should be forced to adhere to minimum wage, provide all benefits given to an american counterpart, including health care insurance, and pension. Global competition should be based on merits and qulity of work, not on the lack of labor laws or taking advantage of the financial chaos in still developing countries. Not only will this greatly increase the impoverished areas were work is outsourced, it will prevent American companies from taking advantage of people in need.

      --
      Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It's just that yours is stupid.
    3. Re:I would not complain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The two Indian engineers will be able to support many more people and relieve them from poverty whereas the American engineer would probably waste a large part of his money on the unnecessary things in life.

      Yeah, trivial things like paying rent, supporting a family...

    4. Re:I would not complain... by JollyGoodChase · · Score: 1

      Sure..and when it's your job being replaced, explain to your family how you're really helping these two Indian families. Perhaps they have a job for you over there.

    5. Re:I would not complain... by Mengoxon · · Score: 1

      and I would take that job in India... better than being unemployed!

    6. Re:I would not complain... by ClosedSource · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Look, there are people all over the world who would like to come to the US and work. Why should the high tech companies and foreign engineers get special treatment over other businesses and other workers?

      I have no problem if foreign engineers get in line with everyone else to get a green card or citizenship in the US. But it's not fair to US engineers to be singled-out for replacement because the high tech industry has bribed the government for special treatment.

    7. Re:I would not complain... by unicron · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So if I go to college, work my ass off, get a degree, and get employed by Sun, continue to work my ass off, I shouldn't complain when I get fired because I was underbidded by quasi-slave labor? And if I complain I'm a racist? And for some reason, because he has more children than I do, he deserves the job more?

      This is capitalism at its worst, not its best. In America, we hire Americans. We don't sublet to another country to save money and backstab our own people. At best, this is an atrocious act of business and a slap in the face of ever American. At worst it's an act of slavery and the exploitation of both our countries. I hope Sun gets dragged over hot coals on this one.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    8. Re:I would not complain... by justinbigelow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "The two Indian engineers will be able to support many more people and relieve them from poverty whereas the American engineer would probably waste a large part of his money on the unnecessary things in life"

      So you're point is that American developers dont have families to provide for. Since we can only put one roof over our children's head we are less worthy than if two could be housed elsewhere?

      "If you are not a racist and think that Americans are better than Indians"

      Thats not racism it's nationalism (or more derisively jingoism). If the contention was that caucasions were being replaced with Indians then that would be racism.

      "If you are either a customer or shareholder of Sun then you should also applaud them: they either make more profit or able to sell at lower prices."

      Lowered operating costs dont always translate to lower costs, usually it means higher profit margins. Customer benefit is suspect at best.

      m2c,
      Justin

    9. Re:I would not complain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you realize that a H1-B is a foreign work visa, which means that the person has to be working in the US, and has to be paid at least minimum wage, right? I think you're confusing this with outsourcing.

    10. Re:I would not complain... by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's a little short-sighted.

      Why do you think that countries have import laws? To prevent people with lower costs of living and lower wages from doing what you are doing. The relative poverty in India puts the U.S. at a disadvantage if the companies can import products from India cheap. It will destroy the competitive market of the same products in the U.S.

      Tariffs and trade agreements are designed to prevent this, as are employment regulations. Breaking these only serves to crush local competition since they cannot reduce their costs signifigantly enough to remain competitive. And if they did, YOUR wages would drop, and you would be put in the same boat as India.

      The global villiage does not bring the poorer nations up to our level, it drags the richer nations down to theirs. And it the Greed of the multi-nationals which ensures that this happens.

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    11. Re:I would not complain... by mpechner · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not a racist, but there are a lot of Americans out of work. Give them the work. I know for a fact they are working for less money. The H1 is meant is supplant a short fall of US Labor, not replace it. Unfortately the INS does not control the levels of H1 Visas. It is controled by law. The last law upping the limits was enacted a few months before the bust. The economy is in the dumpers and the law is not being repealed. Sun would have been smarter to just offshore the project instead of hiring H1 visa employees. That they can do. Replacing US Citizens with H1 employees is not legal. Of course a change in the job description and wala, a layoff and a rehire at a 35% savings. You are right. I am wasting my salary. On savings incase I get laid off again. Oh yeah, $1100 a month to rent a dump.

    12. Re:I would not complain... by Mengoxon · · Score: 1

      I like you... you are so philanthropic...

      Only problem with your suggestion is that if we had these same labour laws everywhere, most Americans wouldn't be able to afford things like cars, clothes, toys, computers, etc. since most of these industries depend on cheap labor to manufacture.

      Not any worse than Americans is asking a long way, but I agree with you that there need to be minimum standards, but this would have to be way below what the US has or we must stop our current luxurious ways (and I mean 90% of the US live in "luxury" compared to the ROW) immediately.

    13. Re:I would not complain... by michael_cain · · Score: 2, Insightful
      IANAL, and this comment is confined strictly to H1-B workers (not work done offshore). I believe that the law requires that companies employing H1-B workers must pay them wages conforming to the prevailing rate in the area. That is, it's supposed to be illegal to bring the workers in and undercut the wages being paid to citizens or green-card holders. The purpose of the law was to provide a temporary fix to a worker shortage, and specifically not to hold down wage expenses for the companies.

      It may be good for Sun's shareholders and/or customers, but it's illegal.

    14. Re:I would not complain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If you are not a racist and think that Americans are better than Indians, then you should applaud Sun


      Do you even realizing what you are saying? The article is talking about SUN specifically targeting Americans for termination and preferring Indians over other nationalities. How does it make me a racist if I don't applaud that?
    15. Re:I would not complain... by Hellkitty · · Score: 1

      The two Indian engineers will be able to support many more people and relieve them from poverty whereas the American engineer would probably waste a large part of his money on the unnecessary things in life.
      ::snipped::
      Long live capitalism!

      Capitalism doesn't care what the American engineer spends his money on. The unnecessary things in life are what makes capitalism flourish.

    16. Re:I would not complain... by Mengoxon · · Score: 1
      In America, we hire Americans.


      You don't actually believe that that is the case, do you? Obviously you are not a racist, but certainly an ignorant and unaware jingoist.

      And for some reason, because he has more children than I do, he deserves the job more?


      No, in my personal opinion he only deserves the job because he offers the same qualities at a cheaper rate.
    17. Re:I would not complain... by DwySteve · · Score: 1

      Your point would make sense if these imported workers didn't have to live in america while they worked. So an american wants to be paid $x for a job. What's he going to spend it on? Of course, we'll spend it on terrible american luxuries, like a car, and maybe a movie every once in a while, but he'll also spend it on food, housing, and medicine: things he needs to survive which will comprise the majority of what his paycheck goes towards, and maybe a little saved over for the future. But if an imported worker gets paid $(x-y) which is much less than x, then our imported worker will be struggling to pay for the basic necessities of life. If he's having trouble making ends meet living in a hovel eating ramen every night, then how is he going to put significant money back into our economy, let alone give any to his family back in (IMPOVERISHED_NATION)?

      --
      http://angryee.blogspot.com
    18. Re:I would not complain... by hazem · · Score: 1

      Remember, though, that when that American worker spends that money, it's going into another business. That business hires workers, pays taxes, and buys materials from another business that hires...

      Economic growth/strength does not just come from the amount of money in the system, but also from the amount that money changes hands. Having a pile of money is like having a lot of potential energy. Spend that money and it is like kinetic energy in the system.

      If anything, though, hiring foreign workers is worse for the US economy, particularly if those workers send the money home. The American worker will *waste* that money by eating out, going to movies, etc. At least the money stays in the local economy for a few more iterations...

    19. Re:I would not complain... by LordNimon · · Score: 1

      If you really believe that, you're an idiot.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    20. Re:I would not complain... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Yet, strangely enough, Americans were able to buy many of these things when it was still American labor that was producing them.

      Your claim is flatly contradicted by history.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    21. Re:I would not complain... by Mengoxon · · Score: 1
      So you're point is that American developers dont have families to provide for. Since we can only put one roof over our children's head we are less worthy than if two could be housed elsewhere?


      No that's not my point. My point is... and anyone familiar with probalities and statistics must agree with this. That a dollar spent in India can support many people for a couple of days, whereas a dollar spent in the US will buy you two cans of Coke.

      Thats not racism it's nationalism (or more derisively jingoism). If the contention was that caucasions were being replaced with Indians then that would be racism.


      There is an Indian race and an American race (both are wild mixes, like all races). There is an American nation and an Indian nation. I used the word "racism" because it has a negative taint (for good reasons), unfortunately nationalism, for many, does not have a negative taint.
      Maybe the use of the word "nationalism" or "jingoism" would have been more appropriate but I don't think using the word "racism" is wrong and it does bring my point across more clearly.

      Lowered operating costs dont always translate to lower costs, usually it means higher profit margins. Customer benefit is suspect at best.


      I agree - that's why I wrote "either" make profit "or" sell at lower price. I know that Sun will prefer to keep that extra profit, but sometimes (and you agree with that) increased competition could lead to a price drop - rather than Sun shutting down the business.
    22. Re:I would not complain... by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      Some things transcend racism. We're talking about the survival of our nation here, not just refusing to serve Apu at the Denny's counter.

    23. Re:I would not complain... by Mengoxon · · Score: 1

      No it is not. Many of the things we buy today were not available back then.
      Almost all American earned less in the past making for cheaper labor.
      Ask any manufacturer to start producing all those goods which state "Made in China" in the US at the same price and he will tell you to go to hell.

      Also talk to your parents or your beloved historians and ask them whether the American standard of living has improved or not.

    24. Re:I would not complain... by Brushfireb · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding me? I am an american. I am in college. But what you are saying has absolutely NOTHING to do with capitalism. "In america, we hire Americans". I bet you are the same type who thinks we should keep out immigrants, quoting "American For Americans". Regardless of your opinions, this is, as mentioned above, Capitalism at its best. Simply from an economic perspective, If you were to look at the long term (world economy), you would realize that this is actually BETTER for the whole world (although, it might be worse in the short term for those ex-sun employees). As those people in india are hired for cheaper wages, Sun can produce more, be more profitable, create more wealth and provide more substinance than it could in America. Along with this, there would be less wasted dollars, allowing suns goods too (theoretically) compete better in the free markets. If everyone sends their labor to india, then guess what happens, the cost of labor rises in India, and the costs of labor here falls, and people start sending those jobs back. (Im sure there would be some saying "What about those poor indians. Indian Jobs for Indians!!". And they would be JUST as wrong as you are. Everyone wins here in the long term, just not in the short term. Its the long term that counts.

    25. Re:I would not complain... by Skyshadow · · Score: 1
      You don't actually believe that that is the case, do you? Obviously you are not a racist, but certainly an ignorant and unaware jingoist.

      Name-calling aside, you're completely off-base.

      The economy of any country is based pretty much entirely on the people having jobs so they can, in turn, go out and buy things. If individual companies start firing people in their country and either bringing in foreign workers or contracting that work overseas, it damages the overall national economy.

      That's why we have government. They tax these things to make them less attractive to companies and encourage them to continue paying citizens of their country to do these things, or at least reclaim some of that money and pour it back into the national economy.

      If enough jobs are shipped to India, the US economy will suffer as consumer spending tanks. It's that simple. Therefore, the government needs to come in and regulate how these things are being done. It's not racist, it's not jingoist, it's economic reality.

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    26. Re:I would not complain... by Mengoxon · · Score: 1

      For a nation to survive you need to continuously either automate or outsource.
      I know that it is tragic because many jobs get lost on the way. But if a nation gets stuck in their ways and wants to preserve all jobs rather than looking for new and more efficient (cheaper) methods it will certainly falter (remember the Luddites)

      I know it sounds sarcastic: but if programming becomes a cheap job function then we need to move on. Programmers need to learn new jobs: sometimes executive programmers supervising, maybe, Indians, sometimes making burgers at McDonald's

      Think about it this way: If Sun came out tomorrow with a programming language for computers that would replace all need for programmers - should we outlaw it, because it makes programmers jobless?

    27. Re:I would not complain... by jgalun · · Score: 1

      The global villiage does not bring the poorer nations up to our level, it drags the richer nations down to theirs. And it the Greed of the multi-nationals which ensures that this happens.

      God, I am so tired of the childish anti-globalization arguments on Slashdot. Let's look at this:

      In the last twenty years, there has been a major increase in the standard of livings of both China and India, as both nations started to privatize and nationalize.

      There has also been a major increase in the standard of living in South Korea, Thailand, Malaysia, and Taiwan.

      In the last twenty years, there has been an increase in the standard of living in the US as well.

      That makes, as far as I can tell, both parts of your statement completely false. Poor nations are rising to our level, and rich nations are not being dragged down (at least, America, Canada, Britain, and Australia haven't, Germany's has problems but that's due to reunification, not globalization).

      Oops.

    28. Re:I would not complain... by xchino · · Score: 1

      I agree with what you are saying. But the reason we couldn't buy most of these things we have is because they are so incredibly artificially expensive. If I wanted to buy a super deisel 100mpg box car like are so popular in europe, I'd have to pay roughly the same as buying an American SUV. This is because we tax foreign imports coming into this country to protect corporations from the same kind of foriegn cheap labor competition that workers are facing. What I don't understand is why corporations are provided protection and not the people. I mean how is it so much worse for an Indian tech firm to replace an American tech firm, than an Indian worker to replace an American worker? Companies are reaping the benefits of cheap labor, while preventing companies based in those countries to do the same. I just don't understand this double standard. In a nation supposedly for the people, by the people, why is it that the corporations are the only ones being protected, and why are the being protected in an unfair manner?

      --
      Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It's just that yours is stupid.
    29. Re:I would not complain... by HeelToe · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up.

    30. Re:I would not complain... by TopShelf · · Score: 1
      Then I trust you don't buy any imported goods that were formerly made here in the good ole U S of A, do you? Like TV's, radios, electrical cords, clothes, shoes, etc.? What's happening here is the swinging of the pendulum - during the go-go 90's, any loser who could spell HTML could get an "IS" job with a kickin' salary, attracting more labor into the market as a result.

      I particularly like the "In America, we hire Americans. We don't sublet to another country to save money and backstab our own people." People in manufacturing have been facing for decades what is only now starting to affect IT workers - there's a whole world out there aiming to compete on the world stage. Are you ready???

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    31. Re:I would not complain... by Mengoxon · · Score: 1

      why an idiot? what's your point?

      would it be foolish of me to take up such a job? What makes me deserve something better than my Indian colleague?
      It is not too unrealistic that Sun would offer some Americans to settle over to India to guide the transition.
      Of course it is more realistic to get a better job in the States but my point is really:

      Why should I not accept a job that an Indian is willing to accept and at the same time be jealous of him taking away my job?

    32. Re:I would not complain... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Most of what a laborer can afford now was available 50 years ago. Such things are generally no more affordable to them now as then. I don't need to "talk to my parents". I can simply see how they live and remember how they and their parents lived in previous decades.

      I also personally have known older generation members of the UAW and other unions. What american workers make now is chickenfeed compared to what it once was.

      What "manufacturers" want is simply not relevant in this discussion. They're only out for the instant buck and have no concern for the longterm health of the economy.

      Even if your claim is true, the ability to buy more bulk is of disputable value.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    33. Re:I would not complain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and I would take that job in India... better than being unemployed!

      No, you wouldn't take it. India won't let you in.

    34. Re:I would not complain... by Mengoxon · · Score: 1

      Thanks for your lessons in economics...

      Pretty sound theory you put up there. Pity that you forgot about "trade between nations". Without it, these days of globalization, your model becomes rubbish.

      Think about this:

      1. Sun will make extra profits from this model. Which will get extra taxes to the US government and extra profits to the mainly American stockholders.

      2. Shirts that are made in Bolivia instead of US cost one dollar instead of ten. This makes Americans effectively richer because all Americans who have ten dollars can now afford ten shirts instead of one.

      3. Are you suggesting that the best of all state economies has only domestic production? Well my dear Sir, not only is that foolish, if you really start thinking about it (no more Sony, Mercedes, Nintendo and even X-Box) but it is nothing but jingo!

      4. Do you really trust the governments to make more wise decisions and do the right things?

    35. Re:I would not complain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "privatize and nationalize."

      Those two are kinda polar opposites ;)

    36. Re:I would not complain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, you're not a racist, just a nationalist...well, maybe a touch of socialism. Lets just say you're a nationalist socialist.

      Anyways, you're right! Those damned Indians taking our good, hard working American jobs. They have no right! We should make them wear patches on their shirts saying "H1-B" or something so we can pick them out easier. Better yet, lets find some place to put them all, after all they're taking your HOUSING too. How dare they!

    37. Re:I would not complain... by acidrain69 · · Score: 1

      Well this is an American company. They are displacing AMERICAN workers.

      I don't appreciate your "rascist" statement. While I don't think americans are better than the indians, I don't give a DAMN about the indians trying to come into this country to offset our jobs. I happen to be unemployed. If they want better conditions in their country, then they should bleed in the streets and go on strike like the americans did. Don't come over here and bring us back to those days. Corporations are being given back all this power, and no good will come of it. By doing this, the wealth is redistributed from the middle and lower classes into the CEO and boardmembers pockets, along with a little for the shareholders.

      --
      -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
    38. Re:I would not complain... by Mengoxon · · Score: 1

      ?hugh?

      my point with the manufacturer was that it would be impossible to produce at the same cost as in, for example, China

      Obviously, you live in a different US than I do. Who could afford a video recorder, computer, toys, the amount of clothing, several bikes and other stuff thirty years ago. Cheap cars were foreign cars in the old days, before US government foolishly decided to limit imports which allowed the Japanese to go up-market.

    39. Re:I would not complain... by unicron · · Score: 1

      This isn't about the job being between me and the indian guy that lives down the street and the indian guy says "whatever he's willing to do it for I'll do it for 90% of that". This is about killing a fuck-ton of jobs simulatenously and putting 200 indian workers, in india, to work at half the pay rate.

      I'm so utterly sick of this PC bullshit. As a white male American, no matter how racist I'm not, if I say ANYTHING negative about a group of people, even if I'm not stereotyping in the least, I'm a bigot asshole. This isn't about indians or Americans. It's about keeping the money, our money, American money, in America. American money used to buy American products so the American company can make more American products.

      This is so UNBELIEVABLY fucked up. America is the ONLY country where it's people are made to look like racist bigot asshole for having pride in where we come from.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    40. Re:I would not complain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This is capitalism at its worst, not its best. In America, we hire Americans.


      Tribalism? Here? No way!
    41. Re:I would not complain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This does not help impoverished people world wide any more than sweat shops creating clothing do. This is exploiting the individual workers, by making them work for less money, for longer hours, under higher stress( if you screw up we ship you back to the jungle! ), etc. This is not the way to help the impoverished people of the world. Incidentally, what do you think will happen, when tech companies find out that there are poorer countries than India, in which they can find people to work for half of what the Indians will?

    42. Re:I would not complain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hey, shouldn't you be working right now? Stop surfing /. or I'll call Sun and report you to HR. I'm sure they can find another bazillion Indians to come fill your job after they have you kicked out of the country.

      Here's something you should worry about: How many Americans do you think are going to be unemployed for how long before you end up strung from a light pole by a mob who've seen their homes reposessed and their children wearing clothes from a thrify store?

      Seriously now, I'm not (just) being an asshole. Think about it.

    43. Re:I would not complain... by Brushfireb · · Score: 1

      I dont think you are racist. At all. If that was the impression I gave off, it was unintended. Racism means nothing in this debate. Economics means something. Capitalism means something. From a short-term social perspective, you are very right. From a long term, world economy growth perspective, you are very wrong.

    44. Re:I would not complain... by Mengoxon · · Score: 1

      because the Indians are cheaper... Sun's decision is colour-blind. It is purely based on financial data.

    45. Re:I would not complain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Way to break it down for us into simple name-calling terms there. Do you work for FOX News by any chance?

      Countries have different standards of living. Countries with a high standard of living ought to be defending that so they don't become countries with low standards of living. How is that unreasonable or socialist or nationalist?

      Governments *owe* their citizens protection. That's what a government it. Protection includes both encouraging economic growth (helping out companies, which the US gov does in spades) and reigning in those same companies from damaging the overall economy (which is what they do in some areas, like import tariffs, and what they need to be doing in regard to IT).

      Name calling doesn't improve anyone's impression of your intelligence, by the way. Thought I should add that.

    46. Re:I would not complain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has the American standard of living imporoved or not? This really depends on how you measure standard of living. By some accounts, it has gone down, by others it has gone up. Your statements seem to suggest that you are ignorant of this fact. I'm sure google could help to enlighten you...

    47. Re:I would not complain... by Mengoxon · · Score: 1

      I agree with you. Those native Americans should never have let in those damn settlers in the first place...

    48. Re:I would not complain... by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 1

      Well, everybody knows the "indian race" would be deeply hurt those comments. :)

      --
      Bowie J. Poag

    49. Re:I would not complain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In America, we hire Americans.

      And in Brazil, we eat fast food, watch Holywood, listen to Britney Spears, drive Fords, email on Compaqs and Dells.

      You are far away from the bottom.

    50. Re:I would not complain... by Bryan+Weatherly · · Score: 0

      Corporations are being given back all this power, and no good will come of it.

      Who do you want to have all the "power"? Do you want the government have the right to tell corporations who they employ and how much they pay them? If you don't like a particular company does, don't buy their products or use their services, but don't complain because people make a profit by running a business.

    51. Re:I would not complain... by LordNimon · · Score: 1
      I say you're an idiot because I don't think you would really work in India. The reason why I say that is because they are hiring IT workers in India. There's nothing stopping you from going there now to work. So, please go!

      I'm assuming, of course, that you're not an Indian.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    52. Re:I would not complain... by acidrain69 · · Score: 1
      Who do you want to have all the "power"? Do you want the government have the right to tell corporations who they employ and how much they pay them? If you don't like a particular company does, don't buy their products or use their services, but don't complain because people make a profit by running a business.

      Yes actually, I do want the government to say wether or not these corp's can exploit americans. Or at least I want these corp's accountable to their workers. Is that such a bad thing?

      I will complain if I want to complain. Don't be a dick. If I see a company cutting off 2500 jobs, that has an effect on MY chances for employement. Don't be ignorant. You are just ignoring the greater problem. This isn't just about 1 company. This is about a LOT of companies and how they are exporting the US IT job market.
      --
      -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
    53. Re:I would not complain... by dukerobillard · · Score: 1
      In America, we hire Americans. We don't sublet to another country to save money and backstab our own people.

      Wow, what America do you live in? Who made your sneakers? Who picked the California orange you had for breakfast? Who bused the table at the Friday's where you had lunch?

      At least in Europe they're honest about the whole "guest worker" thing.

    54. Re:I would not complain... by unicron · · Score: 1

      The boots I'll give you, Timbs made in China. I had a DR. Pepper(bottled in Georgia) and 2 donuts(made in the back of the Krispy Kreme) for breakfast. My table was bused by a 17 year old pimply-faced white kid.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    55. Re:I would not complain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, okay, but I have got a job. My original statement was that I'd rather go to India than stay unemployed.

    56. Re:I would not complain... by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      Think about it this way: If Sun came out tomorrow with a programming language for computers that would replace all need for programmers - should we outlaw it, because it makes programmers jobless?
      Since we are ran by Republicans, it wouldn't matter. to them, only those at VP or above ever accomplish anything, so we serfs can go fuck ourselves.

      I believe that something like that should be outlawed, in fact.

    57. Re:I would not complain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, you sure would have loved to live under Stalin in the USSR. He had the power and told all people what to do "in the interest of the nation"
      Those were the days.

    58. Re:I would not complain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Luddite!

    59. Re:I would not complain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, but what you are probably talking about is US dollars. I am talking about: How many American can afford a computer? a car? meat for lunch? etc.

      After all, this is what really defines your standard of living...

    60. Re:I would not complain... by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 1

      This is so UNBELIEVABLY fucked up. America is the ONLY country where it's people are made to look like racist bigot asshole for having pride in where we come from.

      n.b.: This is only true if you're a straight white male.

      - A.P.

      --
      "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    61. Re:I would not complain... by h4x0r-3l337 · · Score: 1
      We don't sublet to another country to save money and backstab our own people.

      Oh yes you do...

    62. Re:I would not complain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I reckon that would be at an unemployment rate of about 20-30%. But it really depends on how retarded those unemployed are.
      I mean, like, stringing me from a light pole - that's not going to get them any job. On the contrary, they might end up in prison for that. Well, I guess they could be working there, stamping license plates. Talk about real slave labour. Did you see Gangs of New York? I did not like the movie that much but great acting by Daniel Day-Lewis. Anyway, what was my point?

    63. Re:I would not complain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This is capitalism at its worst, not its best. In America, we hire Americans. We don't sublet to another country to save money and backstab our own people."
      Are you sure you are talking about the United States of America?
      because to me it seems that you're very far away from the reality...

    64. Re:I would not complain... by acidrain69 · · Score: 1

      If it weren't for the corruption, then yes, I would have loved it. Capitalism suffers just as much from corruption as communism did.

      Isn't that what governments are SUPPOSED to be for? To ensure the interest of the nation? Instead of lining your pockets with handouts from Disney so you can screw the American consumer?

      --
      -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
    65. Re:I would not complain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting AC pretty much shoots down the general idea of my intelligence anyways, so I figured, what the hell. :P

      Employing artificial constraints in order to achieve equality is basically socialism, whereas capitalism would have advocated the use of free trade and the "invisible hand" to move things into balance. What you see today is capitalism. What you would like to put into place is socialism.

      Nationalism comes into play with the quote "American jobs are for Americans". All the talk of being "pro-American" is the basic concept of nationalism. You think that the government should protect its own national interests over

      Hence, nationalism and socialism.

      I should also probably add that part of the reason the Holocaust happened was because the native Germans were complaining that the Jews were holding down all the jobs. Hitler just played off of that.

    66. Re:I would not complain... by justinbigelow · · Score: 1

      "There is an Indian race and an American race (both are wild mixes, like all races). There is an American nation and an Indian nation. I used the word "racism" because it has a negative taint (for good reasons), unfortunately nationalism, for many, does not have a negative taint. Maybe the use of the word "nationalism" or "jingoism" would have been more appropriate but I don't think using the word "racism" is wrong and it does bring my point across more clearly."

      My only problem with interchanging racism and nationalism is that it obscure my point (which I probably didnt make clear to begin with, d'oh). There are ethnicities: East Indian, European (of which make up the majority of American caucasions), Latinos, Africans, Asians, etc...
      One's ethnicity is not necessarily tied to their nationality (e.g. if your parents are East Indian but you were born on American soil you are considered a citizen of the United States and thus a US national).
      That being said, I have no problems with anybody of any ethnicity earning the same wage as a caucasion or anybody else. I work for a telecom manufacturer and we have a large percentage of Asian and Indian engineers and managers. I am friends with a quite a few of them and don't differentiate between them and engineers/managers of any other ethnicity.

      --The continuation of my point is about to diverge slightly from H1-B to offshore outsourcing because the initial comment I responded to blurred the lines when brining up money sent back to other countries.--

      I would like to see as many tech jobs stay here as possible for the simple reason that the wages paid to the employee/contractor get put back into our economy. Taxes are taken out to support our schools, police/fire departments, Social Security, Medicare, etc... I believe H1-Bs would not be a concern from this perspective since taxes are probably taken out (I assume). But when jobs are moved out of country the wages, contracting fees, personnel training are going to another country. Our community/state/country is losing out due to lower cost labor overseas.

      Do I begrudge these countries opportunity needed to improve their economy, do I want to keep the poor poor as it were? Not at all. An increased standard of living is a boon to any country through increased global security and more trading partners/new markets. But when that benefit comes at the detriment of my country I have to take what I think to be a justifiable exception. Nobody wants to see their people/country lose valuable jobs even if the side effect happens to be a benefit to others. If any East Indian, Chinese, etc... were to tell me they would be happy to be put out of work so a programmer in Thailand could get a leg up I would call them a blatant liar.

      I am a nationalist, I hate to turn on CNN and see that Dell moved 3000 call center jobs to wherever, if that makes me a xenophobe or jingoist then I can live with that, I love my country and its citizens and any body from any other country that doesn't believe the same way is doing a disservice to their fellow citizens regardless of their ethnicity.

      m2c,
      Justin

    67. Re:I would not complain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey, I pretty much agree with you, except for this one point:

      2. Shirts that are made in Bolivia instead of US cost one dollar instead of ten. This makes Americans effectively richer because all Americans who have ten dollars can now afford ten shirts instead of one.


      Except that we don't buy our shirts directly from Bolivia. The Gap buys them from Bolivia, then charges the same amount to us. The extra profit, goes to the Gap. This makes the Gap more profitable, but this result is only minutely reflected in the profits of the stakeholders. If I own Gap stock, I benefit from the extra profit, but at a fraction of what the Gap benefits, and nowhere near the direct benefit from buying from Bolivia.

      So I may in actuality, be able to buy 1.000005 shirts.

    68. Re:I would not complain... by ByTor-2112 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, that is not entirely true. It creates more wealth for the upper class, while draining wealth from the middle class. It widens the gap between classes. It creates serfdom.

    69. Re:I would not complain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at it this way, because we have minimum wage laws in America, and there are none in India, the company can hire out engineers, techs, manual labor, or whatever at a cheaper rate than I can legally compete with.
      hello! excuse me!! India is a Socialist Republic , as declared by its constitution and USA is a capitalistic economy. So what you state here should be stated the other way round. There are minimum wage laws in India too. Only that a goddamned cup of coffee costs only a nickel. :-)
      I don't have the option to program for $4 an hour.
      yes. but you can do it at $5.75 an hour- the legal minimum wage in the US. Only that no one wants to pay you so less and look bad.
      .... but I don't think American corporations should be allowed to treat foreigners any worse than they treat Americans. I think they should be forced to adhere to minimum wage, provide all benefits given to an american counterpart, including health care insurance, and pension.
      au contraire - American companies having Indian branches and employees there treat them great. By the price of a cup of coffee i mentioned before, you can guess how much it costs them to provide the benifits. they do all what you mention and a lot more... lots of parties, picnics and outings.. free stuff, gifts, interest free loans - u name it, they got it. Infact its a very good deal to work for them in India.

    70. Re:I would not complain... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I bet you are the same type who thinks we should keep out immigrants, quoting "American For Americans".

      You're putting words in his mouth; this is a strawman attack and renders the rest of your argument baseless.

      This argument has nothing to do with immigrants, only H1B guest workers.

    71. Re:I would not complain... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      And in Brazil, we eat fast food, watch Holywood, listen to Britney Spears, drive Fords, email on Compaqs and Dells.

      There's nothing holy about American movies.

    72. Re:I would not complain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With the lawsuit in the works, Scott Mcnealy's curry doesn't get cheaper, just spicier.

    73. Re:I would not complain... by Bryan+Weatherly · · Score: 0

      I do want the government to say wether or not these corp's can exploit americans.

      The purpose of the government is to protect individual rights. If the government dictates a corporation's employment practices it is taking the corparations rights away. I don't see how outsourcing labor is an "exploitation" anyway.

      I will complain if I want to complain. Don't be a dick. If I see a company cutting off 2500 jobs, that has an effect on MY chances for employement

      You are in control of your own employment. If you can't find a job in the computer industry, maybe you should look for a job in some other industry where there is a demand for employment. I don't understand why you think somebody owes you an IT job just because you desire one.

    74. Re:I would not complain... by acidrain69 · · Score: 1
      The purpose of the government is to protect individual rights. If the government dictates a corporation's employment practices it is taking the corparations rights away. I don't see how outsourcing labor is an "exploitation" anyway.

      Outsourcing labor isn't an exploitation. Offshoring it to cheaper countries is exploiting countries with a lower standard of living to dump a bunch of americans, and IMO it affects us all negatively.
      You are in control of your own employment. If you can't find a job in the computer industry, maybe you should look for a job in some other industry where there is a demand for employment. I don't understand why you think somebody owes you an IT job just because you desire one.

      Of course I'm not in control of my own employment. I chose where I would like to work, but I don't give myself the job. I have already spent my time in college, and I don't feel like going back there so soon after graduating. I'd prefer to voice my opinions on the matter and try to rectify the situation, instead of turning a blind eye to it like you are doing. No one owes me an IT job, but if there is an IT job to be had doing work for THIS country, MY country, then I'd like to see that job stay here; not watch some pithy CEO loser squeeze more money out for himself by ruining american job markets.
      --
      -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
    75. Re:I would not complain... by Bryan+Weatherly · · Score: 0

      Offshoring it to cheaper countries is exploiting countries with a lower standard of living

      How is providing "cheaper" countries with jobs exploiting them? Moving jobs to countries where labor is cheaper is beneficial to everyone involved. The company benefits by getting labor at a lower price and increasing its profits, the laborers benefit by getting more gainful employment opportunity than the other opportunities that exist in their country. Both countries' economies grow as a result.

      I'd prefer to voice my opinions on the matter and try to rectify the situation, instead of turning a blind eye to it like you are doing.

      Your opinion on this policy is, in my opinion, one of the biggest problems with the line of thinking in this country. You are upset that Sun is taking employment opportunities away from people in this country. It is absolutely Sun's right to do this; we live in as close to a free market economy that exists in the world. Your proposed solution to the problem is for the government to step in and tell Sun what it can and can't do. What if the government told you where you could and could not work? Would this be acceptable to you? This type of government intervention in business hurts EVERYONE, stifling a company's business practices and reducing their profits hurts everyone involved with the company, all the employees, the shareholders and the economy in general. You want to rectify the situation, what situation? Companies don't owe people in MY country jobs. In MY country companies need to be able hire whoever they want.

      You say I'm turning a blind eye, my eyes are wide open. Maybe you should open yours.

    76. Re:I would not complain... by acidrain69 · · Score: 1

      "How is providing "cheaper" countries with jobs exploiting them?"

      Exactly as I said, they are exploiting cheaper conditions in countries that don't have as good worker protections and consumer protections, to the detrimment of US workers. I don't think it can be ANY clearer that this is exploitation.

      "Moving jobs to countries where labor is cheaper is beneficial to everyone involved. The company benefits by getting labor at a lower price and increasing its profits, the laborers benefit by getting more gainful employment opportunity than the other opportunities that exist in their country. Both countries' economies grow as a result."

      No, not everyone benefits. The workers in the US whose jobs are replaced CERTAINLY do not benefit. You are only looking at the benefits to the corporation, while I am looking at a larger picture, that is how that loss affects the cities these corp WERE based in.

      "Your opinion on this policy is, in my opinion, one of the biggest problems with the line of thinking in this country"

      I won't cry if you leave. Our country has much bigger problems than public opinion of corrupt politics and corporations.

      "You are upset that Sun is taking employment opportunities away from people in this country. It is absolutely Sun's right to do this; we live in as close to a free market economy that exists in the world."

      Your point is...? Screw the free market economy. It erodes all the things people have worked for in this country for the last 200 years.

      "Your proposed solution to the problem is for the government to step in and tell Sun what it can and can't do. What if the government told you where you could and could not work? Would this be acceptable to you?"

      What I'm saying is that Suns actions are illegal. They have broken the laws on H1B employee use. They are hurting the US workforce by doing this. They are using this as a replacement for their workforce, and that is not the intention of the law. The stated intention is to fill positions that can not be filled by the available workforce. I don't care about H1B visa workers, they can go build their own damn economy instead of leaching off ours because they can work for 1/10th what we can.

      Sometimes companies do illegal things. You can't just blindly say it is "stifling a companies business practices" if they are breaking the law. Do you honestly think all corporations can do no wrong? That is pretty blind to me.

      " In MY country companies need to be able hire whoever they want."

      Then eventually unemployment in your country is going to be huge, because there is no way american workers can compete with foreign workers who require 1/10th the salary to survive. It has nothing to do with living w/o certain things and everything to do with the monetary system of that country. American money is just worth more in other countries. If you really believe this crap you are spewing, then you deserve to lose your job to some foreigner. Have fun in the unemployment line.

      --
      -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
    77. Re:I would not complain... by Bryan+Weatherly · · Score: 0

      they are exploiting cheaper conditions in countries that don't have as good worker protections and consumer protections, to the detrimment of US workers. I don't think it can be ANY clearer that this is exploitation.

      Exploit; To make use of selfishly or unethically. While Sun is acting in their own best interest there is nothing unethical about what they are doing. Nobody is being taken advantage of here. If one is willing to do the same job for a lower wage, then it would be irrational to pay someone else a higher wage.

      No, not everyone benefits. The workers in the US whose jobs are replaced CERTAINLY do not benefit. You are only looking at the benefits to the corporation, while I am looking at a larger picture, that is how that loss affects the cities these corp WERE based in.

      Everyone involved in the exchange of labor benefits. The US workers displaced don't fit into this exchange, that is why they were displaced. It is their responsibility to find employment that fulfills their desired income. In the REAL larger picture, you will see that if a company has larger profits this is actually a benefit to the cities that these corporations are based. If they make more money it allows the company to grow, creating more jobs in that city. The company can increase the wages of its local employees which they can spend locally in that community, it creates growth in the entire economy. Growing economies create more jobs, even jobs for the people that were laid off in other industries. Everyone benefits.

      Now let's look at your idea. The government forces the company to keep paying its employees a wage that is too high for the work they do. This decreases the company's profits and they company either loses money or cannot grow at its full potential. They may be forced to cut back or not pay other employees the wages they do deserve. The economy does not grow, everyone suffers.

      Screw the free market economy. It erodes all the things people have worked for in this country for the last 200 years.

      Wow, I'm not sure what I can say to this. Did you ever stop and think why this country is the best country that has ever existed, what sets it apart from all other countries? Could it be the fact that we have a relatively free economy and true individual rights?

      They have broken the laws on H1B employee use. They are hurting the US workforce by doing this. They are using this as a replacement for their workforce, and that is not the intention of the law. The stated intention is to fill positions that can not be filled by the available workforce. ...they can go build their own damn economy instead of leaching off ours because they can work for 1/10th what we can.

      This law is immoral and unconstitutional, any law that does protect individual rights is WRONG. Not only does this one fail to protect peoples' rights, it takes rights away! The only people that are leaching off the economy are the people who are being paid salaries that they don't deserve. They are hiding behind an unjust law.

      Sometimes companies do illegal things. You can't just blindly say it is "stifling a companies business practices" if they are breaking the law. Do you honestly think all corporations can do no wrong? That is pretty blind to me.

      Of course some companies do illegal things, I wouldn't imply that they don't. They only time that a company does something that is really wrong, regradless of the legality, is when they are infringing upon somebody else's rights. That is the only time.

      If you really believe this crap you are spewing, then you deserve to lose your job to some foreigner. Have fun in the unemployment line

      If I lose my job to somebody who is willing to do it for less money then obviously I was not worth what I was being paid. There is nobody to blame for this, that is the the way that economies work. I am ok with this fact, there is an unlimited amount of oppurtunity i

    78. Re:I would not complain... by acidrain69 · · Score: 1

      "Exploit; To make use of selfishly or unethically. While Sun is acting in their own best interest there is nothing unethical about what they are doing. Nobody is being taken advantage of here. If one is willing to do the same job for a lower wage, then it would be irrational to pay someone else a higher wage."

      It is completely unethical. Maybe you don't know what ethics are. Look that one up next. H1B visa workers are being taken advantage of, because they work for less. American workers are being taken advantage of because they can't afford to live for the prices that foreign workers can afford to live. Once again, it has nothing to do with standard of living, it has to do with local economies. American workers can no more change the value of the dollar in their local economies than cause the moon to fall from the sky.

      "Everyone involved in the exchange of labor benefits. In the REAL larger picture, you will see that if a company has larger profits this is actually a benefit to the cities that these corporations are based. If they make more money it allows the company to grow, creating more jobs in that city. The company can increase the wages of its local employees which they can spend locally in that community, it creates growth in the entire economy. Growing economies create more jobs, even jobs for the people that were laid off in other industries. Everyone benefits."

      But it DOESN'T benefit those cities, and that has been my entire point. If they are starting to use labor from outside the US, or even just outsourcing, then it DOES NOT benefit that community. That money goes out of the city, and out of the country in the case of offshoring. No corporation increases the wages of it's employees if they are offshoring. That money goes straight to the top and to the shareholders. Everyone does not benefit, in fact, more and more, a select few at the top are the ONLY ones who benefit.

      "Now let's look at your idea. The government forces the company to keep paying its employees a wage that is too high for the work they do. This decreases the company's profits and they company either loses money or cannot grow at its full potential. They may be forced to cut back or not pay other employees the wages they do deserve. The economy does not grow, everyone suffers."

      The workers in the Sun case were not even offered jobs at lower wages, so your assumption about the government forcing higher wages does not apply. Nobody works for a company to "let it grow at it's full potential" They do it to earn a salary.

      "Wow, I'm not sure what I can say to this. Did you ever stop and think why this country is the best country that has ever existed, what sets it apart from all other countries? Could it be the fact that we have a relatively free economy and true individual rights?"

      Maybe I should clarify. I despise what globalization is making of our free economy. Wether this country is the best is a matter of controversy. You won't see it that way because you are blinded by the free market.

      "This law is immoral and unconstitutional, any law that does protect individual rights is WRONG. Not only does this one fail to protect peoples' rights, it takes rights away! The only people that are leaching off the economy are the people who are being paid salaries that they don't deserve. They are hiding behind an unjust law."

      What do you mean, "any law that does protect individual rights is WRONG"? I thought you liked this country? You're right about the leachers tho (to an extent, they are not the only leachers). I do agree that CEO's make too much money, as do most upper management.

      "Of course some companies do illegal things, I wouldn't imply that they don't. They only time that a company does something that is really wrong, regradless of the legality, is when they are infringing upon somebody else's rights. That is the only time"

      Which they did in this case. They are using H1B workers to replace their workforce.

      "If I lose my job to somebody who is willing

      --
      -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
    79. Re:I would not complain... by Bryan+Weatherly · · Score: 0

      I'm not going to go around in circles with you arguing about this, there is no point because most of your arguments are irrational. I'll just respond to some of your more disturbing comments.

      That money goes straight to the top and to the shareholders. Everyone does not benefit, in fact, more and more, a select few at the top are the ONLY ones who benefit.
      This is a half truth. While it is true that the only people that DIRECTLY benefit from company profits are shareholders, everyone else involved that respective economy benefits INDIRECTLY through economic growth. Why do you not understand this? Its not even really the point, it is just an example of why a free market economy works. The thing that bothers me is the fact that you think it is a negative thing that shareholders and CEOs are the only ones who directly benefit from profits. Why should a shareholder who makes an intelligent investment sacrifice some of his money for somebody else who is less fortunate? Why should a CEO who is the successful head on a company give up some of his successful just because somebody else is less successful? Why should they be punished? Because other people are not as successful as they are? This line of thinking leads to communism, but maybe that is what you want.
      Wether this country is the best is a matter of controversy. You won't see it that way because you are blinded by the free market.
      Looking at other places to live and other forms of government rationally, I don't see any other place I would rather live than here. You are implying that you disagree, what country to do think is better and why? You may be right that I am "blinded" by the free market, I don't see any other economic system that works better. Perhaps you could enlighten me with what you think would be the ideal economic system and why its better.
      What do you mean, "any law that does protect individual rights is WRONG"?
      Sorry that was a typo, it should say 'that does not protect'.
      They are using H1B workers to replace their workforce.
      How is this infringing upon someone else's rights? The American workers do not have the right to remain employed at Sun nor do they have the right to force Sun to keep them employed. You may "believe" that they do, but that has no bearing on reality.
      When I see corporations destroying this country so some CEO and his shareholders can make a quick buck on the suffering of others, I DO think I am owed something. I'm owed something by the congressmen and women who are there to look after our country's well being. I'm owed something by our loser of a president.
      You are a parasite. You don't want to take responsibility for your own well being, you want somebody else to provide it for you. That is truely pathetic, even more pathetic is that you are not the only one who thinks like this. What could the government possibly owe you? The only purpose of the government is to make sure that nothing is taken away from you, not to give you things. George Bush is not your mommy, the congress doesn't need to spoon feed you through legislation.
      No, I am not at fault for my unemployment. I lost my previous job because of budget cuts. I worked at a University, and thanks to this warmongering administration, budget cuts at schools around the country has resulted in belt tightening. I was lucky enough to be held onto until I graduated, but after I left school, the position was eliminated.
      So you mean to tell me that you weren't even really laid off?? You graduated school and now you're just too lazy to go get a job?? And you are complaining about it??
      I don't know if you are actually from this country, but if you are, I think you are not a very good american. I think you are a capitalist. While america operates on a capitalist system, being a die-hard capitalist as you are takes away from your concern with the well being of this country. Thanks for working to make sure America is a shitty place.
      If a capitalism takes away f

  10. Good! by xchino · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't see why they should enjoy the protection import taxes and such bring them against global competition when they have no penalty for exporting jobs. Tax imported goods, tax exported jobs. Don't tax exported jobs, don't tax imported goods. You can't have it both ways.. corporations want protection from countries without labor laws becase they can't compete with sweatshops or massively underpaid workers, but they also want to reap the benefits of those same workers. I don't see why my employers job should be any more protected than mine.

    --
    Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It's just that yours is stupid.
    1. Re:Good! by Lavi+DM · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked, taxing exported jobs is called "taxing foreigners at a higher rate than anyone else."

      And the IRS does it. American people under the line of poverty pay no taxes, get social security, food stamps and those things. H1B's under the line of poverty pay a 15% income tax.

      In general, any H1B pays more taxes than Americans making the same ammount of money.

    2. Re:Good! by nolife · · Score: 1

      The memory company Micron is a perfect example. I can not find the figures right now but I believe they recieved over $15 million from the federal government to compensate for potential chip dumping from Hynix in South Korea (which Micron tried to buy but failed). Well, two months ago Micron all but closed both of their US fabs to concentrate on cheaper overseas production.

      Here is their H1-B info

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    3. Re:Good! by swb · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Moreover, the consistant argument CEOs and top officers make for their huge salaries and generous bonuses (in spite of drops in profits) is that they posess talents that are in short supply (leadership, strategic thinking, etc), and that the short supply demands large wages.

      If that's the case, why isn't Americas marketing and executive class full of H1-Bs? If India is competant at generating engineers then I'm sure they're highly skilled at generating MBAs and marketing people, too.

      The fact is that H1-B is solely an excuse for corporations to keep engineering pay low. There's just no other logical conclusion you can reach.

      I've had this discussion with numerous marketing execs before and in the final analysis they have the idea that engineers are ALWAYS worth less than marketing and must always be paid less, and that much of their motivation for seeking H1Bs has been driven largely by the fact that they can't justify driving marketing salaries any higher in response to market-driven increases in engineering salaries.

      The market-driven reality should have been that marketing salaries went lower than engineering salaries, simply due to market demand. But this didn't happen, due to some weird class system that values the marketing/executive class above all others, even when the market will not sustain it!

    4. Re:Good! by be-fan · · Score: 1

      I'm sure they're highly skilled at generating MBAs and marketing people, too.
      >>>>>>>>>>
      You'd be surprised. Culturally, engineers and doctors are held in much higher regard than and MBA or marketing person would be. As a result, the top Indian schools are good at training people in technical fields, but not so good at training liberal arts people. The same would would be true for a highly technology oriented school in the U.S.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    5. Re:Good! by Zimm · · Score: 1
      corporations want protection from countries without labor laws becase they can't compete with sweatshops or massively underpaid workers, but they also want to reap the benefits of those same workers

      Oh but it gets much worse. Just think if some programmers will not only work for half your rate in this country, but instead will work for free!. Companies will just use these slaves to build most of their software, and pay the rest of us budget rates to glue these pieces together. Welcome to the open source world.

    6. Re:Good! by FeloniousPunk · · Score: 1

      I haven't met many managers who seemed to retain much command of their liberal arts "skills" once they entered the workforce. Just give the H-1B imported managers a good wardrobe allowance, a copy of GQ, and train them to integrate the latest tech buzzwords into their daily conversation and presto! chango! - insta-Manager. No one will ever know the difference.

      --
      I know this because Tyler knows this.
    7. Re:Good! by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Seriously, though, management does take work. It takes different skills, and technology-types don't always appreciate those skills. Sure, there are bad managers, but there are bad tech guys, what's your point?

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    8. Re:Good! by swb · · Score: 1

      Business management is supposed to be an analytical profession, not an artistic one. It's got much more in common with engineering disciplines than it does with the humanities.

      In many Universities, it's a seperate college from liberal arts and engineering, although I suspect that may be to keep the b-school donations and donars from worrying about the English department squandering their donations.

      The same would would be true for a highly technology oriented school in the U.S.

      I'm sure that these folks would vehemently disagree with that analysis, and I believe their technolgy orientation and credentials are beyond question...

    9. Re:Good! by xchino · · Score: 1

      "Oh but it gets much worse. Just think if some programmers will not only work for half your rate in this country, but instead will work for free!. Companies will just use these slaves to build most of their software, and pay the rest of us budget rates to glue these pieces together. Welcome to the open source world."

      That was a very flawed analogy. First off, open source != Free. You're thinking of Free Software. There's quite a difference in the two. Open Source simply means you make you code open to those you distribute it to.

      Second, free software != free work. While many of the applications out there are labors of love, many programmers are still paid to further develop their programs. Gentoo has corporate backing, Dan Robbins is working on it full time, and I bet his pay is pretty damn good too.

      Third, companies can't use open source developers as slaves. As an open source advocate, I make my code freely available and I charged no one to do it, but if company X says "Hey, we need something to do this" I'm not going to code it for free, nor do I know ANY open source developers who would.

      I think you have quite a misunderstanding of open source, free software, and how they work.

      --
      Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It's just that yours is stupid.
    10. Re:Good! by be-fan · · Score: 1

      An MBA is a liberal art in most universities. Liberal arts has nothing to do with art. Being a historian is also highly analytical, but is still considered a liberal art.

      As for MIT, it's a special case. It's highly technology oriented and has one of the best business schools in the world. However, most schools are not MIT, and no Indian schools are MIT.

      Culture plays a large role here: few Indian mothers think to themselves "I want my son to be an MBA when he grows up." Sure, it's a stereotype, but as someone who is an aerospace major because of such a mother (I love you mommy :) I can attest that there is a grain of truth to it.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    11. Re:Good! by swb · · Score: 1

      Still not buying it.

      Virtually every MBA program worth a damn is set up as a seperate college within its University and is wholly distinct from the Liberal Arts programs that represent the humanities and the social sciences.

      Furthermore, the analytical skills of a business major are based on far more objectifiable information and quantative data than are those of the typical historian, English major or other prototypical Liberal Arts major.

    12. Re:Good! by Zimm · · Score: 1
      That was a very flawed analogy. First off, open source != Free. You're thinking of Free Software. There's quite a difference in the two. Open Source simply means you make you code open to those you distribute it to.

      Right, that's why I fork out a visa # everytime I visit freshmeat. Good luck getting redhat for free too.

      Second, free software != free work. While many of the applications out there are labors of love, many programmers are still paid to further develop their programs. Gentoo has corporate backing, Dan Robbins is working on it full time, and I bet his pay is pretty damn good too.

      I can list off the top of my head open source apps that I used just today vim, ant, and jboss. All are free of charge, all were expensive to develop, all are used by companies with out putting money in the hands of that apps developers.

      Third, companies can't use open source developers as slaves. As an open source advocate, I make my code freely available and I charged no one to do it, but if company X says "Hey, we need something to do this" I'm not going to code it for free, nor do I know ANY open source developers who would.

      So a company gets operating systems, and applications for free, then pays some one to just glue them together, great. Companies love open source, they get slaves to do the hard part(building the low level apps) then they get cheaper monkeys to glue the parts together. This is great how?

    13. Re:Good! by xchino · · Score: 1

      "Right, that's why I fork out a visa # everytime I visit freshmeat. Good luck getting redhat for free too."

      That doesn't even make sense. I can't tell if you were being sarcastic or not. There are a few nonfree opensource projects on freshmeat, but not many. Besides that, freshmeat has nothing to do with open source or free software, other than being one of the many repositories for such software. You can download and use Redhat for free, without any charges, because it is free software. Most Unix variants are open source, but are nowhere near free. However, when you get one of these free apps (esp GPL) you are recognizing that there is no warranty and no gaurantee of support. This is how open source makes money, by supporting the application they create.

      "I can list off the top of my head open source apps that I used just today vim, ant, and jboss. All are free of charge, all were expensive to develop, all are used by companies with out putting money in the hands of that apps developers."

      Still you misundertand what open source mean. Software can be open source without being free, and can be free without having open source. All the software you listed is not only open source, it is free sopftware. The reason you're not putting money directly into the hands of the developer isn't because it's open source, it's because it's free software.

      "So a company gets operating systems, and applications for free, then pays some one to just glue them together, great. Companies love open source, they get slaves to do the hard part(building the low level apps) then they get cheaper monkeys to glue the parts together. This is great how?"

      The creators of open source aren't "slaves" as you seem to like to put it. No one is forced to contribute to open source. How is this different than companies paying for the low level apps and still having to hire a cheaper monkey to glue them together? How is this NOT great? Are you implying that companies should have to pay for OS and licenses and applications, or that there is something wrong with open source?

      --
      Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It's just that yours is stupid.
    14. Re:Good! by Zimm · · Score: 1

      " Still you misundertand what open source mean. Software can be open source without being free, and can be free without having open source. All the software you listed is not only open source, it is free sopftware. The reason you're not putting money directly into the hands of the developer isn't because it's open source, it's because it's free software."

      Ok, I don't think you understand how open source works. Does redhat pay for the development of vim?, xawtv?(i'm using them now). The way you see it open source software wouldn't be created until a developer was paid to create it. But this isn't the way it's being done now. By far most open source software is created by developers for free, then companies like red hat grab it package it and sell it. True there not slaves in that they don't have to do it, but yeah red hat gets software for nothing. Which brings me to my point. Companies are using free open source products in place of products that they would have paid for, money that would have gone to a developer.

      "The creators of open source aren't "slaves" as you seem to like to put it. No one is forced to contribute to open source. How is this different than companies paying for the low level apps and still having to hire a cheaper monkey to glue them together? How is this NOT great? Are you implying that companies should have to pay for OS and licenses and applications, or that there is something wrong with open source?"

      This is not great because companies get for free what they would have other wise paid for, what would otherwise have been money in a developers pocket. Wouldn't it be better to make companies pay developers for their work? I think it would be great if as you say developers made a company pay them to develop that software, and to GPL it. I just don't see that, most open source software is also free software, software that I work with every day.

    15. Re:Good! by xchino · · Score: 1

      "Ok, I don't think you understand how open source works. Does redhat pay for the development of vim?, xawtv?(i'm using them now). The way you see it open source software wouldn't be created until a developer was paid to create it."

      No, as I said, a majority of open source is a labor of love. Many other Open Source applications were funded by companies, for their internal use, and released out to the general public. They are not selling outher peoples software, not are they allowed to. They are simply redistributing it completely in accordance with the licensing.

      "But this isn't the way it's being done now. By far most open source software is created by developers for free, then companies like red hat grab it package it and sell it."

      Again you mistake free software for open source. Redhat doesn't sell xawtv or vim, they include it. When you "buy" redhat, you only buy the service and support, which is all RedHat sells. RedHat created an excellent easy to use install system that is used by tons of other distros, without charge.

      "True there not slaves in that they don't have to do it, but yeah red hat gets software for nothing. Which brings me to my point. Companies are using free open source products in place of products that they would have paid for, money that would have gone to a developer."

      So when did it become a businesses responsibility to ensure the career of developers? What is wrong with using something free if it is of equal quality? Should I start paying royalites to Francis Scott Keye's family every time I sing the star spangled banner? Where is the logic in the "People should have to pay for everything" mindset?

      It took developers and engineers time and money to come up with protocols like TCP/IP, yet Microsoft just steals these people's work and puts it in their OS and sells it.

      "This is not great because companies get for free what they would have other wise paid for, what would otherwise have been money in a developers pocket. Wouldn't it be better to make companies pay developers for their work?"

      When a company pays you to write them a program it is THEIR program, not yours. When you write an open source, GPL'd program, it is YOUR program. That is the payment developers get for writing free software. I make good money at my job, but I'd like to make more. I'd rather help out a bunch of my fellow Linux geeks than make a little more money however. This is the spirit and attitude that drives open source and scares the crap out of closed source commercial vendors. We don't want compensation, we want credit. We want people to say "Gee thanks for writing me this program, it's ever so useful!", not "Gee this program would be useful, too bad it's so prohibitively expensive that only mega corporations could hope to implement such a solution."

      "I think it would be great if as you say developers made a company pay them to develop that software, and to GPL it. I just don't see that, most open source software is also free software, software that I work with every day."

      IBM, Dell, Sun, Redhat, Orcale, HP, and many other huge corporations throw tons of money behind open source development. The money goes into the developers pockets. You complain about redhat not having to pay for the software, yet you say you are using it right now. Did you pay the developers for their time? You're actually using the program, RedHat is just distributing it.

      The problem as you see it, I think, is that you think open source, free software developers are being ripped off. This couldn't be further from the truth. As I said, there are rewards far greater than monetary for a developer, else you'd see Linus having a "pay for patch acceptance" program with Linux. The only other problem I could see you having with free software is that you are a closed source commercial developer and OSF and FSF are cutting into your bread and butter.

      --
      Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It's just that yours is stupid.
    16. Re:Good! by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Whether you buy it or not is irrelevent. MBA very well might be more objective and work with more quantative data than historians. That doesn't change the fact that they are not technical people in the same way an engineer or scientist, or the fact that Indian engineering colleges do not produce a whole lot of them.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    17. Re:Good! by Zimm · · Score: 1

      "No, as I said, a majority of open source is a labor of love. Many other Open Source applications were funded by companies, for their internal use, and released out to the general public. They are not selling outher peoples software, not are they allowed to. They are simply redistributing it completely in accordance with the licensing."

      Yes most open source software is a labor of love, and is free. Vim and xawtv add value to redhat, value that redhat doesn't have to pay for. Add to that Gnome, now i've covered all the apps i've got open right now, oh yeah galeon too. Check this out: http://www.gnome.org/friends/
      I don't think there is any doubt that gnome adds value to many of the distros out there.

      "So when did it become a businesses responsibility to ensure the career of developers? What is wrong with using something free if it is of equal quality? Should I start paying royalites to Francis Scott Keye's family every time I sing the star spangled banner? Where is the logic in the "People should have to pay for everything" mindset?"

      So you don't care if busniesses ship their programming jobs off to India? Businesses don't owe anyone anything do they?

      "The problem as you see it, I think, is that you think open source, free software developers are being ripped off. This couldn't be further from the truth. As I said, there are rewards far greater than monetary for a developer, else you'd see Linus having a "pay for patch acceptance" program with Linux. The only other problem I could see you having with free software is that you are a closed source commercial developer and OSF and FSF are cutting into your bread and butter."

      Maybe we can now bring this discussion back on topic which is the H1-Bs. The complaint in most threads here is that compaines either ships jobs off to India, or Hires cheaper H1-Bs that increase the supply of labor to take american jobs. We all want to get paid for our work, yes H1-Bs do compete for our labor, Indian's in India also compete for the work. Companies want to cut costs, that's how they do business. Another way companies do this is through free software. I'm not going to fault a group of developers for their labor of love, it's just there are side effects to the result of that labor. Companies won't pay a developer to build something that they can otherwise get for free. Just as they can further reduce costs by shipping the "glueing of components" jobs over seas.

      I actually don't see free open source software as either good or bad, like most things it's more complicated then that. Unfortulatley I think that there is an over looked side effect that is bad for developers and good for corporations in this instance. US Programmers compete with H1-B's, programmers from other countries, and free software in this globalized complicated world.

    18. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the question isn't whether India (or Korea, or Japan) produces _lots_ of good MBAs. The truth is they produce _some_ for sure, but H1-B isn't designed to tap them up. There was a time when these countries only produced _some_ good engineers, but H1-B was right in there, sucking them up, even then.

    19. Re:Good! by yora · · Score: 1

      Moreover, the consistant argument CEOs and top officers make for their huge salaries and generous bonuses (in spite of drops in profits) is that they posess talents that are in short supply (leadership, strategic thinking, etc), and that the short supply demands large wages.


      If that's the case, why isn't Americas marketing and executive class full of H1-Bs? If India is competant at generating engineers then I'm sure they're highly skilled at generating MBAs and marketing people, too.


      There are 2 problems with importing MBAs and marketing people from India. The first problem is that marketing is a very localized activity, and what works in India is typically not what works in most countries. Second is that in India there is a huge market for marketing and MBA people.


      But after all this, you still find a lot of Indians in a lot of American and Europian FMCG companies, although mostly outside Europe or US. Current President & CFO of Pepsi is an MBA from India. I suppose that if the US had an H1B program for MBAs, then there would have surely been more of them in the US.



      yora
    20. Re:Good! by rollingcalf · · Score: 1

      I suppose that if the US had an H1B program for MBAs, then there would have surely been more of them in the US.

      MBAs can and have been hired as H-1B. H-1B visas aren't restricted to technical professions - there are accountants, teachers, doctors, and fashion models who have been hired with H-1B visas. The majority (about 60%) of H-1Bs are in software or engineering, but that's because that is how companies chose to use the visas; it isn't a visa that was created for the tech sector.

      --
      ---------
      There is inferior bacteria on the interior of your posterior.
  11. No big deal by siskbc · · Score: 4, Insightful
    bye bye US jobs and hello nice fat contract for Sun India.

    I don't see this as being so evil. I have always been of the opinion that if someone else (or a machine) can do your job better and cheaper, have fun at the unemployment line. If this is the case, then, sorry for the unemployed, but I doubt they would have taken a pay cut. Hell, they're lucky that Sun took so long to figure out that there are a lot of highly trained Indian coders.

    Then again, maybe Sun will regret firing such a huge experience base. That may be.

    I will say one thing - I don't hear people complaining about when overpaid middle-management types get canned for a new batch of college grads (from this country). I hope we're not indicating that we're bitter about foreigners taking American jobs? Because that would be a bit silly.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    1. Re:No big deal by Cereal+Box · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Clearly you don't understand the situation. It's not like programmers are saying "boo-hoo, these damn Indians are willing to work for $60K/yr, I can't live like that!", they're saying "these damn Indians are willing to work for $6K/yr, there's no possible way I can live on that". Yes, there is exaggeration in those figures (but when it comes to outsourcing... not really), but it is NOT a matter of Indians working for just a little bit less than Americans are willing to work -- they're working for significantly less than we could comfortably live with. Programming is not akin to working at McDonalds -- it's skilled, technical work. Why should programmers have to settle for an unskilled laborer's wages simply because there are poor workers willing to work for unlivable wages?

    2. Re:No big deal by Cereal+Box · · Score: 1

      Again, programmers are skilled laborers. Why should skilled laborers put up with poor foreigners driving the value of skilled labor down the point where it would make more sense to work at McDonalds than go to college to be a programmer?

    3. Re:No big deal by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

      Why not? Just so the CEO can have 2 jets? Americans are not upset that companies are trying to save money. Americans are upset that the money saved goes to the CEO and board of directors. Which in effect means that lots of the push to save money is only out of greed and selfishness.

      I will admit to being one that believes American Companies should hire American workers. Who provides for the security of these companies? What exactly does the company owe to the USA, and how exactly is the company paying its due?

    4. Re:No big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem obsessed with the idea that US programmers' lifestyles are somehow the concern of these "poor foreigners." Care to elaborate on that?

    5. Re:No big deal by Cereal+Box · · Score: 1

      Oh, I know they're not the concern of of the "poor foreigners", seeing as how they benefit directly from these hiring practices. This _should_ be the concern of skilled American workers facing the prospect of being replaced by an Indian willing to work for unlivable wages.

    6. Re:No big deal by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      So the taxes the company pays to the government, that doesn't cover what it owes the country huh? Maybe they should be allowed to stop paying them then if they seem to not count for anything.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    7. Re:No big deal by sweetooth · · Score: 1

      Apparently you haven't looked at how little most large companies actually pay in taxes. They have so many write offs they end up either paying a very small amount or nothing at all.

    8. Re:No big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, join a union.

    9. Re:No big deal by elmegil · · Score: 1

      Or, like Halliburton and many many others, they've incorporated in Bermuda and pay zippo in taxes.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    10. Re:No big deal by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      WTF, 'extremely frugally' means you don't have two cars, a huge home, a boat, & a two week overseas vacation... LOL...

      I make less than $20k a year & always have in the tech industry, but it's the tech industry on the east coast (& heck it's not even really 'coastly' unless you count lake Erie). I can barely pay for a car, apartment, insurance, & food with a little extra... I have problems getting another job because the companies would like to outsource rather than hire me for a little more than I make now (maybe I could buy a house or pay back those college loans that would make it so I'd have to live in a box to pay them back atm)...

      The problem isn't just in the bigger cities of the west coast, it's everywhere. They have a much lower cost of living (especially if actually in... say... India) & often even those coming here stick together, which to be honest we (the ones already in this country) don't so they can live on less...

      It has nothign to do with people insisting on having "two cars, a huge home, a boat, a 2 week overseas vacation, etc", it has everythign to do with making a living in a global market we are ill prepared for as a workforce...

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    11. Re:No big deal by stu-pendous · · Score: 1

      I agree that programming is a skill, (as I code myself) but as India has shown, this skill is not difficult to duplicate. Simple economics says that that once the supply of the skill goes up, the price people are willing to pay for it goes down. It is no more India's fault that they have a lower cost of living than the US as it is Tuscon's for having a lower one than New York City. The guy in Tuscon is always willing to work for less (in fact his quality of life may end up being higher than his NYC counterpart that makes more)

      If industrialized nations are going to champion globalization we are going to have to understand that we cannot have it both ways. We can't sell and manufacture our produts in developing countries while selectively choosing what jobs their citizens can or cannot have. It would be an artificial constraint to the idea of a free market.

      McDonalds is always hiring but we have other options here... do something else where the skillset is more valuable. (value as in people are willing to pay more for it, not value as in it is important to a company)

    12. Re:No big deal by computechnica · · Score: 1

      Is this part of that giant sucking sound that Ross Perot talked about? American jobs going overseas is part of a long Pansy Scheme that may end up with a small number of ultra rich CEO's and a large number of unskilled underpaid american in-DUH-viduals scrapping to get what ever crap service jobs are left.

      This (or maybe the next) generation of school kids are faced with going to college to get a Degree in medicine, law, or business because those may be the only high paying jobs that haven't been outsourced to foriegn lands.

    13. Re:No big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to be an H1b worker until I got my green card. Only in the first year I made just 60k/year. But since then I've been making much more than my manager. I have seen layoffs not just for Americans, but also the poor performing foreign workers. Salary is not low for foreigners, it is low for less capable workers be it local or foreigners. All my friends I know make much more than their American counterparts and they are employed inspite of being much expensive compared to their American counterparts. I think the market is driven by talented people as well as fraudulent corporations.
      My point is the young workers could be cheap only when they are new to the country and they have to prove their skills. Later it's all talent and marketing skill of the individual.

    14. Re:No big deal by Jhon · · Score: 1

      Think. Most large companies who employ US works end up providing a HUGE tax revenue to the government. Not only does a dramatic drop in wages effect the amount of revenue the US can generate, but by out-sourcing labor entirely the revenue can be eliminated.

      Not only does labor suffer, but so do those who BENEFIT from labor -- welfare, medicare, SS, etc. etc.

      This cant continue without some serious downsizing of the US lifestyle AND social programs. I'll bet a shiney new nickle that when this starts to hit home, you'll see some heavily protectionist legislation start to pass...

      -jhon

    15. Re:No big deal by thegrommit · · Score: 1

      a) A college degree is not a prerequisite to becoming a good programmer
      b) Lots of people can program sufficiently well enough that there is now a surplus of supply - guess what that does to the price

    16. Re:No big deal by slow_flight · · Score: 1

      And what they DO pay simply gets passed along to the consumer. Corporate taxes are a myth.

      --

      Karma: Professionally Doomed (mostly affected by inability to keep opinions to self)
    17. Re:No big deal by juan2074 · · Score: 1
      A union only has power if the employer decides to hire the union workers.

      What good will it do to join a union if the employer tells you to take a hike and hires workers in India?

    18. Re:No big deal by JWW · · Score: 1

      Thats Ponzi scheme.

    19. Re:No big deal by galt2112 · · Score: 1

      You make $20K a year with a college degree?
      Unless your degree is in "I learned absolutely nothing in college" you are severely getting ripped off.

    20. Re:No big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sally Struthers signed the diploma... need I say more? Either that, or the degree was in Liberal Arts.

    21. Re:No big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me guess: "graduate student".

    22. Re:No big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me guess: you make less than $20k/year in the tech industry: is it because you spend your days on slashdot?

    23. Re:No big deal by tlianza · · Score: 1

      Again, programmers are skilled laborers. Why should skilled laborers put up with poor foreigners driving the value of skilled labor down the point where it would make more sense to work at McDonalds than go to college to be a programmer?

      Wait, if programmers are skilled laborers, and these poor foreigners are programmers, then aren't poor foreigners skilled laborers?

      Why should THEY put up with being paid so little? Why are THEY any different? Why does one group of skilled laborers deserve two cars and a big house, while another group doesn't (and shouldn't)?

    24. Re:No big deal by TeraCo · · Score: 1
      I award you this award!

      Jesus, where do you think companies get the money from? They don't have a money tree out the back where the 'tax money' comes from.

      I guess you'd be shocked if I told you that 100% of funds that companies use to pay things like rental, wages and yes, even taxes comes from the consumer.

      What the hell is wrong with you?

      --
      Not Meta-modding due to apathy.
    25. Re:No big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      If you make less than $20K a year as a programmer than YOU'RE A FUCKING IDIOT AND DESERVE IT. I have a team of programmers and not one of them makes less than $100K/yr. My advice, be a man and get some morsal of self-esteem and GET THE FUCK OUT OF YOUR SHITHOLE SITUATION. Move. When it comes to the end of your life and you're old and gray and can't shit right, you're going to look in the mirror and ask yourself "did I do enough?"

      What's your answer right now?


    26. Re:No big deal by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      Well here is a rundown of local IT jobs & average pay:

      A network assistant (code phrase for helping maintain/run the network) makes ~$8-9/hr. And locally this is never a salary position, this is so they can manage your pay (if they have money they'll give you more hours if they have less money they give you fewer hours). This is what my job is and I make $9.75/hr (so I am actually above the average, though they just capped my hourly rate so I can never get another raise). Oh & yes that's with a college degree (Bachloer in CIS, Computer Information Systems) and some certifications in networking...

      Most lower end networking positions pay $7.50/hr. starting (it's also what most computer techs make & working for a 'Helpdesk' you'll make this as well).

      Admins (regardless of type) tend to make $30-40k (salary). Recently though to 'qualify' as an admin they want at least 10-15 years experience & insist on personal knowledge of Unix (Linux knowledge doesn't count) & multiple MS Certs in networking. I have only ~5 years experience so I don't qualify these days for this type of job...

      Cisco certified 'Network Engineers' are best off, making 60k (also salary) to top the list of local IT jobs.

      Locally GETS (GE Transportation Services) used to be require about half the local IT jobs as they have a huge network covering a large complex... 'Laid Off' all their lesser IT personnel (~60-80), so now it's about a dozen 'admins' & networkign consultants as needed. Also their helpdesk (which was about 40 people) is in India now so those jobs are no longer local either... This means their are tons of IT people & nowhere near enough jobs for them. Employeers can demand the moon from potential employees because of this glut..

      So no I'm not being under paid, I'm actually better off than most...

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    27. Re:No big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you do realize that you'd make more money being a truck driver or mechanic right? If you're only making 20k a year with a CIS degree seriously consider moving to a place that will pay you more or get into a differnt line of work because you're currently being screwed. Hell, join the military, they'll pay you at least 25k a year.

    28. Re:No big deal by eatdave13 · · Score: 1

      Wrong.

      If 50% of the workers at a non-unionized shop decide to unionize, that job is now a union job. A union can have an open or closed shop, and it is entirely up to them. Most choose closed. If it is closed, any employee in that job position must be a union worker. If the company tries to replace that department with an outsourcing company or open another shop elsewhere, they just broke the law and will most likely have to move the work back to where it originally was and pay back wages plus government fines.

      Unions do have power. I don't understand why more tech workers don't unionize.

      --
      "Verbing weirds language." -- Calvin
    29. Re:No big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I make less than $20k a year.... I can barely pay for a car, apartment, insurance, & food with a little extra

      I work in India for a company that outsources its work to India and I get paid $6.5 K a year. I cant afford a car, apartment etc. Food is cheap though and I can afford it (Farmers make much less than me )
      Since I am willing to work for this and since the company I work for has shown a huge cost savings by hiring me and other people here, how are you going to ever get a raise?

      If you send bac the H1Bs we'll have more people here, even better trained (I went to IIT -M mentioned in the article, annd tho the undergrad education is good, I know that the Gradschool sucks).This is going to make outsouring to India even better option.

      You've got 3 options
      1) Send H1bs back
      2)More outsourcing
      3)Loss

      1)Send H1bs back
      2)Stop outsourcing
      3)Take the effect of reverse tariff barrier (note that US has a trade defecit with the world )
      4)Profit/Loss

      1) Keep some H1Bs ,Make labor laws tougherr
      2)Cleverly use trade barriers so that word doesnt cathc up
      3) Profit?

      I remain anonymous because I'm a coward.

  12. Reason for H1B Visas by mlrtime · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I thought one of the contingencies of hiring an H1B worker is that the employer has to prove that they cannot find a worker of equal skill in the US job market. If they US workers have the same skill set but are just more expensive then this is a violation of the H1B processes.

    That being said, my wife is currently here on an H1B, and I am fairly sure that there are not many people that can do her job and I believe she is working via an H1B on all legal issues.

    1. Re:Reason for H1B Visas by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 1

      ...one of the contingencies of hiring an H1B worker is that the employer has to prove that they cannot find a worker of equal skill in the US job market...my wife is currently here on an H1B, and I am fairly sure that there are not many people that can do her job...

      Another thing to consider is that jobs are being redefined. Today there are people doing the work of 2, 3, even 4 people. Is it still ethical to hire an extremely talented H1B worker to do those kind of jobs? Even when it displaces several american workers in the process?

      It's like taking the intellectual 1% of the world population, and dumping them all into the US job market. If you re-define every engineering job as requiring someone with a 180 IQ, then it's unlikely that job will be filled by an american. If there are 6,000 million people in the world...and 250 million in the US, then americans represent 1/24th the world population. That means that all things being equal, 1 in every 24 of this "intellectual elite" will be an american.

      It's bad enough to have an H1B displace a single job, but if every H1B displaces 3 or 4 jobs here for american workers, that's a crisis.

      --
      The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
    2. Re:Reason for H1B Visas by shaka999 · · Score: 1

      I read an article on this somewhere.

      Basically companies write job requirements that are so specific that they can eliminate anyone but the person they want to import.

      --
      One should not theorize before one has data. -Sherlock Holmes-
    3. Re:Reason for H1B Visas by delphi125 · · Score: 1

      1. Your wife has an H1B,
      2. You do not mention yourself being on an H1B too.
      3. You are therefore a US citizen,
      4. She is therefore eligible for a green card.

      Correct?

    4. Re:Reason for H1B Visas by paranoic · · Score: 1

      I thought one of the contingencies of hiring an H1B worker is that the employer has to prove that they cannot find a worker of equal skill in the US job market.
      <sarcasm>You expect that what ever government entity that determines this, to be better than the patent office is at finding prior art?</sarcasm>

    5. Re:Reason for H1B Visas by eglamkowski · · Score: 1

      I've heard several people say their company has done exactly this. Actually, even worse - they had already hired the H1B and then had that person write the job requirements themselves, so that they were the only one qualified.

      --
      Government IS the problem.
    6. Re:Reason for H1B Visas by MemRaven · · Score: 1

      Probably. But what if he's just on a green card, rather than already being a citizen? I don't think that would allow her to also get a green card. Also, what about gay couples? They're not entitled to your point #4.

    7. Re:Reason for H1B Visas by br0ck · · Score: 1

      I was about to ask the same thing, but looked it up instead. According to the Marriage to a US Citizen FAQ, it takes up to five years to get a green card, and becoming a permanent resident/citizen takes 12-18 months. She's probably in the waiting period. I guess we've been watching too 'marriage of convenience' movies.

    8. Re:Reason for H1B Visas by Gnank · · Score: 1

      "...the employer has to prove that they cannot find a worker of equal skill in the US job market"

      Not necessarily. This is from the American Immigration Lawyers Assoc:

      "Employers who use a lot of H-1B workers must first try to find U.S. workers before they can hire an H-1B. They must also attest that they are not hiring the H-1B if they have laid off or displaced a similarly situated U.S. worker."

      This requirement applies to employers who are "H-1B dependent"--meaning a certain percentage of their workers are H-1B. I don't know if Sun is in that category. And even H-1B dependent employers aren't necessarily required to "prove" anything--"trying" to find U.S. workers just means doing some recruiting.

    9. Re:Reason for H1B Visas by mlrtime · · Score: 1

      I am an american citizen. We are in the INS processes right now (not fun). The same rules still applied to her when she was hired in the US (before we were married).

    10. Re:Reason for H1B Visas by be-fan · · Score: 1

      We could be here on a green card, but I'm pretty sure that a spouse comes along on one of those too...

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    11. Re:Reason for H1B Visas by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Basically companies write job requirements that are so specific that they can eliminate anyone but the person they want to import.

      Wanted: Software developer with exactly 6.2325 years of C++, exactly 3.5736 years of Oracle 7i and exactly 2.472362 years of Oracle 8i, exactly 2.17367 years of Perl, exactly 1.3872616 years of Novell 4.23a (not 4.23b), and a 4-year degree from a university featured in Eastern Times between May and June 1999 with a GPA between 3.471 and 3.473, exclusive. If you have more than the required experience, then you will be considered "overqualified".

    12. Re:Reason for H1B Visas by wawannem · · Score: 1

      If she is your wife she should automatically be a citizen, unless you aren't. I am confused.

    13. Re:Reason for H1B Visas by Odinson · · Score: 1
      She sounds like a wonderful person. Important economicly too.

      We'd like to have her for a citizen, voting in elections, counted in polls, and participating in the great conversation.

      Has she applied for her permanent status?

    14. Re:Reason for H1B Visas by mojotooth · · Score: 1

      my wife is currently here on an H1B

      Being the wife of an American citizen, doesn't she already qualify for a guaranteed permanent immigrant status?

      Either that or that or I should stop watching Gerard Depardieu movies. :)

      --
      -- Mojo Tooth : exploring our world as only an idiot can.
  13. Obviously this post is a troll by intnsred · · Score: 0, Troll

    I mean, capitalism's worship of profits would never mean tossing people out on the street in search of a lower-paid employee, right?! (Especially an evil foreigner!)

    And even if it did -- that cannot happen to college-educated professionals! That sort of stuff only happens to eighth-grade-educated blue-collar manufacturing workers, right?!

    Say it isn't so...

    And the US is invading Iraq because of the rock-solid connections between Saddam Hussein and Al Queda's terrorism, and our heartbreaking concern of the human rights of the Iraqi people too!

  14. Theoretically ... by The+AtomicPunk · · Score: 1

    In a free country, you're free to employ whoever you want to - this shouldn't be illegal.

    However, I'm just as free to stop using Sun equipment. Which I am. :)

    1. Re:Theoretically ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Free doesn't mean a company can exploit its workers. It is wrong (and illegal) to fire someone simply in order to hire someone else to take their place (ie the same job position and description).

    2. Re:Theoretically ... by jgerman · · Score: 1
      As long as it doesn't violate labor laws that exist. Which Sun is accused of. HB-1 visa's are only valid hires if native workers can't be found.

      --
      I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
    3. Re:Theoretically ... by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      Yeah, except these people aren't a part of our "country". They are imported into our country in order to avoid having to hire people from within our "free country".

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  15. If it is true by ellem · · Score: 1

    and get's proved in court I hope Sun goes under. And I like their stuff a lot.

    --
    This .sig is fake but accurate.
  16. Depends upon which camel by BWJones · · Score: 1

    One of the problems I have seen recently with all of the outsourcing (to whereever) is that project management and documentation become really badly cludged. Yes, I know of companies that outsource lots of programming and documentation to India because of the cheap labor, but their products are starting to suffer. Note: this has nothing to do with any particular ethnic group, rather it has to do with outsourcing work to folks completely outside company systems and workflows. I have seen the same thing happen with project outsourcing to other American companies staffed by lots of pasty white people.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Depends upon which camel by SkarTisu · · Score: 1

      I think the phrase goes, "You get what you pay for."

      --
      rm -fr /bin/laden
    2. Re:Depends upon which camel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Note: this has nothing to do with any
      > particular ethnic group

      On the other hand it may in fact have a lot to do
      with the ethnic group. Don't fall victim to the
      argument that we're all just the same. We're not.

    3. Re:Depends upon which camel by blincoln · · Score: 1

      Yes, I know of companies that outsource lots of programming and documentation to India because of the cheap labor, but their products are starting to suffer.

      Foreign companies are just like American ones. Some are better than others, and the cheapest ones are generally of poor quality.

      I've seen top-notch work from India-based organizations, as well as Mickey Mouse amateur hour.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    4. Re:Depends upon which camel by BWJones · · Score: 1

      > Note: this has nothing to do with any
      > particular ethnic group

      On the other hand it may in fact have a lot to do
      with the ethnic group. Don't fall victim to the
      argument that we're all just the same. We're not.


      If you mean what I think you intend, why don't you post this while logged in, instead of Anonymous Coward? Lots of us here would like to know exactly whose opinion this is. Don't use Slashdot as a forum for your bigotry.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
  17. Force the law by jobugeek · · Score: 1

    This would not be a problem if the law concerning H1Bs was enforced. If these people were paid comparible wages, then companies would need a legitimate reason for bringing them in.

    --
    I'm not drunk, I just have a speech impediment. And a stomach virus. And an inner ear infection.
    1. Re:Force the law by bob+dobalina · · Score: 1

      Oh, the law is well enforced, believe you me. My dad ran a tech consulting company for years and he was constantly hounded by state employment administrations and the INS. If they were willing and able to chase down little tech companies, I don't see why they couldn't keep an eye on the Fortune 500 crowd.

      --

      B

      "I'm payin' taxes, but what am I buyin'?" -- James Brown

  18. it's lame by bob+dobalina · · Score: 1

    This doesn't make much sense. Why would Sun lay off people here and try to import H1-Bs when they could just expand staffing at their India Engineering Center and ship development over there, as they have already done for their HPC ClusterTools software? Oh wait, they're already doing that. And also why did my submission of this very same story get rejected three days ago?

    --

    B

    "I'm payin' taxes, but what am I buyin'?" -- James Brown

    1. Re:it's lame by torqer · · Score: 1

      Breifly: I'd guess that if they would have to do some serious expansion to the India Engineering Center to accomodate all the staff they currently have and the staff they would be replacing in America. Which while costs would be lower to build there than in America would still not be cheap. They'd also have a nearly vacant building in America. Which they could close, but I don't see all the C*Os and the rest of upper management wanting to relocate to India.

    2. Re:it's lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true at all! HPC ClusterTools was bought from Thinking Machines (TMC) from Cambridge and is supported and written by folks in Burlington, MA. I happen to know this group very well. Your statement is not at all true.

  19. Re:I would not complain... (MOD PARENT UP) by Rhubarb+Crumble · · Score: 0, Troll
    Amen to that.

    But I bet a lot of the people complaining are all for "free markets" and "capitalism" when it means forcing 3rd world countries to destroy their economies by allowing imports of subsidised american products (think foodstuffs), but as soon as it bites closer to home they get all protectionist...

  20. This Isn't Illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a fact of life given economic globalization. It baffles me that Americans get so pissed about international economic regulation, then complain about situations like this.

  21. Your point? by MindSlap · · Score: 1

    > " As long as they are compensated and treated the same as Americans. Humans are not a commodity. H1B's generally come from desperate situations so of course they _will_ work for a lot less than Americans, but that doesn't mean that it's ethical to exploit the desperate situation in which they came from."

    So whats the point of hiring em in favor or US workers?!?!?
    In the context of the issue, this is Pretzel logic at its finest...

    1. Re:Your point? by zome · · Score: 1

      how about, if you are a boss, asking your engineer "could you make 50 copies of this papers for me"

      Those H1-B always say OK and do it quickly for you.

      For american engineers, some of them will do it, but usually you get "I'm not your secretary"-type respond.

      You can also substitute "H1-B" with "community college graduate" and "american engineers" with "big-and-famous univ graduate" and it works too.

  22. What back? by sjvn · · Score: 1

    > Could this be the straw that breaks the proverbial camel's back?"

    What back? Why? Make people stop buying Sun? I don't think so. All companies exist to make money, one way to do that is by hiring cheap labor. H-1B lets companies do that. Deal.

    One such law suit has already failed, the others will as well. Now getting rid of H-1B might help solve these disgruntled ex-workers problem, but that's another kettle of fish.

    Steven

    1. Re:What back? by arkanes · · Score: 1

      H1-B isn't supposed to be about cheap labor, it's supposed to be about expediting immigration for a massively growing industry that didn't have enough workers. Indian programmers are more than welcome to compete with me, if they go through the green card process like everyone else. H1-Bs are fast tracked in and it's illegal and immoral to replace native workers with them.

    2. Re:What back? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What back? Why? Make people stop buying Sun? I don't think so.

      I think so. I won't buy anything from Sun, and will actively push against using Sun in any project where I have any say at all.

      Hmm... which language should I add to my skillset next, Java or C#? Guess what, it won't be Java.

      I built a computer last month. I had to decide between AMD and Intel, of course. AMD has some H1B workers... Intel has vast hordes of them. My Athlon XP is now humming in the box quite nicely.

      Yes, I do use how a company is acting against myself and my fellow countrymen as one of the criteria in making decisions like these. I can't afford to buy Congressmen, but I can afford to *not* give them either my money or my support.

  23. There is no affirmative action for americans. by Chemisor · · Score: 1

    It is obvious to every businessman that when you hire someone, you hire the best person for the job. With the quality of american programmers going down, is it really surprizing that companies turn to other countries to find qualified computer professionals? And as for the pricing, well, if they want to work for less, it is their prerogative. It is as normal as having one of your competitor companies slash prices in order to drive you out of the market. That is life, and that is justice. To tell the companies that they must hire americans is as dumb as telling them they have to hire blacks solely for their skin color, even when they are not qualified to do the work.And to tell the companies that they must pay everybody an equal wage is clearly a communist sentiment, the inevitable result of which is well described by Ayn Rand in "Atlas Shrugged". Read the story of the Twentieth Century Motor company.

    1. Re:There is no affirmative action for americans. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's amazing how many of you are evading the issue on this argument.

      Sun and many other hi-tech companies are firing qualfied US programmers and hiring H1-B workers at a lower wage. That violates at least 2 laws.

      "that is life and that is justice" can you explain how that is a rational statement?

      Can you provide statistics to back up your claim on "the quality of american programmers going down? Ever stat I see shows that Americans are the most productive workers on the planet.

      Ayn Rand is very smart, I like the way she gets trotted out to justify the brutality of the marketplace- but think about this - what is the difference between the US and India - a large middle class - why do we have a large middle class - we have LAWS that protect workers and you and I have an interest in living in a country where our workers have some expectation of security.

      Like it or not people spend money based on whether or not they think they will have a job, or if they have money in the bank to spend or if they will be able to afford heath care. If you want a healthy marketplace (of products AND ideas) then treat your workers as human beings.

      If it's communism to say that an employee is more valuable than a photocopier then so be it.

      The Ayn Rand crowd wants to turn America into a third world country. Do you want to live in India - go live there. What Sun is exploting Americans AND Indians and they are doing it for short term gain - in the long term there will be few Americans who can afford Sun's products.

    2. Re:There is no affirmative action for americans. by NOLAChief · · Score: 1

      From the article (emphasis mine):

      According to the lawsuit, hardly any of those laid off by Sun were people of Indian descent. Instead, the company created a performance evaluation program that required managers to classify a certain percentage of workers as underperformers, the suit alleges. At the same time, workers who had been at the company for a short time were exempted from this evaluation program, ensuring that few H-1B visa holders would be subject to it. As a result, most of those found to be underperfomers were older, American-born workers.

      The fact is, in any society you have to play by the rules. We decided 40-odd years ago that discrimination of any sort is illegal. The suit is alleging that Sun broke the law by instituting a biased evaluation program, essentially creating "affirmative action" for employees of Indian descent, which is wrong. I'm not saying Sun shouldn't hire Indians over Americans; they should hire the best qualified person for the job, period.

    3. Re:There is no affirmative action for americans. by rdean400 · · Score: 1

      "With the quality of american programmers going down, is it really surprizing that companies turn to other countries to find qualified computer professionals?"

      This is a statement that cannot be left unchallenged. Please provide proof. Moreover, I'd question the scope of this statement, as its presumption is that the quality of all american programmers is going down, meaning that no one in the ever-expanding tech unemployment pool is fit to hold an Indian programmer's jock strap, to borrow an expression.

    4. Re:There is no affirmative action for americans. by Chemisor · · Score: 1


      >>"With the quality of american programmers going
      >> down, is it really surprizing that companies
      >> turn to other countries to find qualified
      >> computer professionals?"
      >
      > This is a statement that cannot be left
      > unchallenged. Please provide proof.

      Given that I can not sample all programmers, no
      proof is possible. However, this has been my
      general impression while working as a programmer
      myself. Most of the talented programmers I've met
      were foreigners. When I was at Microsoft, my team
      had only two Americans out of fourteen programmers.
      (yes, I'm a foreigner too, a Russian)
      The Americans were much more likely to be found in
      the testing labs than in development. I can not
      really explain this, since I do not personally
      believe that "all americans are lazy", but I can
      certainly see that the trend is there.

      > I'd question the scope of this statement, as its
      > presumption is that the quality of all american
      > programmers is going down, meaning that no one
      > in the ever-expanding tech unemployment pool is
      > fit to hold an Indian programmer's jock strap,

      If you are unemployed, that doesn't mean you have
      no talent. Indian programmers are not all that
      great either. There is just a lot more of them and
      while there are many bad ones, there are also many good ones.

    5. Re:There is no affirmative action for americans. by rdean400 · · Score: 1

      If your judgement is based on your experience at Microsoft, then I'd say that's not a representative sample. Really, considering the length of time its taken Microsoft to get Windows to five 9's on intel hardware, I wouldn't put stock in any claims made about any group.

      Although, to be fair, the freedom that America has always had means it's easier for people just in it for the money to go to school and call themselves programmers...they don't really have to prove anything. Certifications aren't much better, because people cram for those and then forget everything 15 minutes after they've passed the text.

      I tend to avoid making generalizations about any group of programmers, except when the groups are competent/incompetent, talented/untalented, motivated by technology/motivated by money.

  24. why not forming a union? by kipple · · Score: 3, Insightful

    this would be the right time for it.

    --
    -- There are two kind of sysadmins: Paranoids and Losers. (adapted from D. Bach)
    1. Re:why not forming a union? by maxconfus · · Score: 1

      because, well, unions suck. at least in my opinion. Truly believe when I say I am not troling you. I do not want another layer between me and my money and that is what I see a union doing. I live in NYS and there are enough layers already. equally as important is that I got into the IT career to be free from static corporate structures so that I could move at the speed of and individual. A union would only slow me down and impose structure that is unecessary.

      --
      A hand up and a foot on every chest...
    2. Re:why not forming a union? by kipple · · Score: 1

      I understand your concerns. However, I think that a union can guarantee that people do not get dumped and replaced with "young and cheap" guys from other countries.
      Please note - I'm not saying that hiring people from other countries is wrong. Right now to hire someone from another country you have to "prove" that he is the only one who can do that job in that area However, this "proof" is done just by paying a lawyer enough to get a visa for that guy.
      My question is: since those guys from India are "replacing" people, why should they be paid less? Either they are not doing the same job (thus there's no need to replace them) or they are paid less (which is unfair).
      I think a union may help in clearing that situation.

      thanks for your answer

      --
      -- There are two kind of sysadmins: Paranoids and Losers. (adapted from D. Bach)
    3. Re:why not forming a union? by veneficus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Q: "Why not form a union?"

      A:
      www.sage.org -- Systems Administrators Guild
      www.programmersguild.org -- Programmers Guild
      www.ipgnet.org -- International Programmers Guild

      Now the question becomes, are these guilds really unions in the full sense of the word, are there tasks that must be done to make it a legal guild..

      The harder problem is getting companies to hire union workers if its a non-union shop.

      --
      -- Hey, what the hell, it's only slashdot..
    4. Re:why not forming a union? by kipple · · Score: 1

      yes it's a hard problem but it's the biggest power and biggest weakness of unions. Without a complete agreement of all workers, they are useless. Plus, a powerful company *has* the power to fsck any union (see McDonalds, which don't hire workers that are part of unions, and moves away when workers are unionizing...)

      oh well, I hope it gets done, because a union in IT can give protection for its subscribers, but also knowledge to them (think about system administration courses held by IT unions by some very-good system administrator.. ).

      --
      -- There are two kind of sysadmins: Paranoids and Losers. (adapted from D. Bach)
    5. Re:why not forming a union? by AnalogDiehard · · Score: 2, Flamebait
      I am not normally pro-union but I agree that a union would be a good defense against this move.

      The problem is that the corporations have been using every tactic to keep unions out of the skilled engineering field. Employees are fed propoganda that unions are counter-productive and that employees already have the benefits that unions have historically fought for for decades (health insurance, disability insurance, vacation time, retirement funds, etc). Corporations screen applicants for any history of union activities (there is no law against discriminating against union activists). If a union drive is detected, corporations will move to stifle it swiftly, even to the point of using any reason to dismiss the offending organizers in their hire. Walmart (and Continental Airlines) are just two corporations who are (was) notorious for their union-busting tactics.

      Unions have a place to fight against corporate exploitation of labor, which is exactly what is going on here. Unions prospered since the late 1800s when exploitation was rampant in transportation (railroad, trucking), mining, garment making, assembly line, telecommunication, machining, foundry, civil labor, arts & entertainment, airline pilots, etc etc.

      The problem today is that the unions can't get their foot in the door and they face a brainwashed labor pool biased against them. The corporations have been using pre-emptive attacks to fend off unions.

      While there is no argument that unions have been riddled with corruption and overextension of their power, the same can be said of corporations riddled with campaign financing, intensive lobbying, accounting corruption (Enron, Worldcom, Tyco), and other manipulation of government law and finances. If there was ever a place for unions, now is the time.

      Like I said, I'm not normally pro-union but I sure come off sounding like it.

      --
      Eternity: will that be smoking, or non-smoking? I Corinthians 6:9-10
    6. Re:why not forming a union? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed.

      Why not? Doctors do, teachers do, public workers do. Are we somehow immune to exploitation, like we are too smart to be exploited or something?

      Face it, as long as big corporations have more lobby than do tech workers (which right now they do), and we have no union to bring government in line over issues like this with an equally big lobby.. How do you expect to get fairness? You need a big stick to hit Sun with, and unfortunately, small lawsuits like this just aren't going to do it. But a big union harassing congress to change the H1B program, or pushing Sun around might accomplish a lot more.

      Unions are the reason we have a 40 hour work week and decent working conditions. Not corporations. They are responsible for the sweat shops. History may not repeat itself, but it does sing the same verse over and over.

      I'm good at my job and willing to work hard, but I can't compete with H1B and I can't change my age. I'm ready to unionize.

      m

    7. Re:why not forming a union? by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      Are you willing to stop working on whatever you are working on, and take zero pay for as long as it takes to get the issue resolved, because 2500 software engineers at Sun got laid off and replaced with H1Bs?

      If yes, then you are ready to be in the Union. If not, then you are not really ready to be in the Union.

      The leverage that Unions give is 'collective bargaining' but the only stick that Unions have is to quit working (en masse) and quit getting paid during that time.

      I'm not being negative, I'm just 'splaining.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    8. Re:why not forming a union? by goodlogin · · Score: 0

      Ive stated this many times, but you do have a union of sorts... They are currently petitioning congress about the H1B issues.

      www.ieee.org
      www.computer.org

    9. Re:why not forming a union? by kipple · · Score: 1

      I think your answer (besides NOT being a flamebait, IMHO) hits the point. IT is the new front-line industry, and therefore it is attracting corporations (after pioneers, just like it was for the transportation industry).

      Those companies are definitively tough, but life was even tougher back then in the 1800s - they were used to /beat/ people trying to form unions.

      So I think that it could be done with less effort than it was needed 150 years ago. Now the question is: how could such IT-union avoid the same mistakes that others union made? ...any idea?

      --
      -- There are two kind of sysadmins: Paranoids and Losers. (adapted from D. Bach)
    10. Re:why not forming a union? by kipple · · Score: 1

      I don't think a lawsuit would make a difference. Using a lawsuit is like fighting an enemy with a weapon /he/ designed. Wrong.

      Lawsuits are just too powerful in the US, and a corporation by definition *has* the power to manage all kind of lawsuits - it has money. Instead, a strike would be an excellent thing to do. Try to imagine the tech support at sun answering the phone like that:

      "hello this is Sun Microsystem. I am sorry I canno t answer the phone because they are replacing me with a willing-to-be-paid-less guy coming from another country. So I got fired because I tried to stand for my right. Good luck with your system administration, you have my deepest sympathy. ps: do you have any job opening at your place?"

      or something like that.

      Oh, that quote was a joke. But it could make the idea sound clear.

      --
      -- There are two kind of sysadmins: Paranoids and Losers. (adapted from D. Bach)
    11. Re:why not forming a union? by kipple · · Score: 1

      Of course I am willing because my company could be the next one. I can stand some zero-paid days because if my company decides to fire me *then* I'm in deep shit.

      Talking about strikes, try to imagine a consumer care center that don't answer the phone.. or other people monitoring "crucial" activities (security centers, emergency restore services, high-availability et cetera) that won't work. Sure they can be fired but it will take time to replace them. In the mean time companies depending on their service will be really pissed off.

      Companies are to fight with their same money - a lack of it, not a lack of people. I think.

      However, thank you for you answer.

      --
      -- There are two kind of sysadmins: Paranoids and Losers. (adapted from D. Bach)
    12. Re:why not forming a union? by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1
      The main problem with a union for computer programmers is that it's not a continuous job - if you go on strike for a week, then the project gets delayed for a week and that's about it. Usually, because what is being sold is a non-scarce resource, if programmers stop working the company can still make money, simply by selling the products you've already made.

      Now network admins could have a much greater impact. Network admins are a continuous job - if your network goes down for a week, your company is screwed.

  25. de/repatriate yourself by spoonyfork · · Score: 1

    USian and need a tech job? Move to India and then become an H1B worker. Heck, the US company that hires you may even pay for your move back home.

    --
    Speak truth to power.
  26. I think it's called a free market. by elchuppa · · Score: 1

    the US exploits most of the third world, it only seems fair that they should get some of the benefits of the free market as well.

    1. Re:I think it's called a free market. by CrisDias · · Score: 1

      US companies are always saying other countries subsidize local products and that everything should be a "free market", "competitive", yadayadayada. Now the rest of the world is exporting labour. It's called offer-and-demand. Welcome to the capitalist world.

    2. Re:I think it's called a free market. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, they could hire them in India and move their operations there.. of course indians in India don't pay US taxes or even visas so it would be worse for the US.

    3. Re:I think it's called a free market. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol, gotta love the US/Racists when they come out of the woodwork. Craw back into your hole jackass.

  27. Makes Good Business Sense by ShwAsasin · · Score: 1

    Although it may be very fair, from a business point of view it makes sense. One could argue that the same rules could apply when a company would force someone into early retirement and higher a young kid to replace them. It's life, deal with it.

    1. Re:Makes Good Business Sense by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      Except that what you describe is also illegal (age descrimination).

  28. That's correct by gatesh8r · · Score: 1

    It is supposed to be temporary for a quick need to fill skilled positions; in this case I don't think H1-B is being used properly.

    --
    Karma whorin' since 1999
    1. Re:That's correct by etcpasswd · · Score: 1

      Are you confusing H-1 with B-1 perhaps? If it is meant to be temporary, why grant it for a long period in the first place?

  29. Already happened elsewhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..like in the textile, apparel and shoe industries (Sneaker sweat-shops in Asia, anyone).

    The sales pitch is that solutions can be developed in an off-shore "Software Factory". Really clever methodolgy can substitute for having smart, creative experienced developers on-site to interface with the business types directly, etc. etc.

    This, of course, is bullshit.

  30. what about outsourcing then? by xpl_the_myst · · Score: 1

    In what way is this different from a company that thinks Indian companies charge much cheaper rates and outsources most of its work (that it earlier did in-house) to them? For those who think outsourcing is not that significant, here in India, outsourced jobs from US companies form a really significant part of companies' revenue. There even exist companies that do purely this work.

    Anyway, I dont understand why a company can be taken to court for having a policy like that. I might be a total maverick for all I care and I might run a company and I may like only blonde-haired sharp-nosed thick-lipped people, how does that come in the way of justice?

    For people like me in India, this is good news, though ;-)

    --
    This sig is empty.
    1. Re:what about outsourcing then? by SkarTisu · · Score: 1

      For people like me in India, this is good news, though ;-)

      Enjoy the next five years, until your country's standard of living increases, wages go up, and suddenly it's not profitable to use your labor anymore.

      Should be a fun ride for you guys, until it stops. ;)

      --
      rm -fr /bin/laden
    2. Re:what about outsourcing then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the United States when you break the law you can be taken to court. Are you telling me that laws are not enforced in India? Oh, and if you want some more good news, I hear that companies are starting to look at China and Singapore for their outsourcing needs. So in a couple of years, you'll probably be out of a job too.

  31. About Time by j_kenpo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's about friggin time. Companies that do that sell out our country. Its not bad to hire from overseas, especially if the person is more qualified, but for god sakes, fly them over here, make them citizens, and pay them what they would any American worker, that way at least they are pumping their salaries back into the American economy. Otherwise, keep it in the country. Its a good thing I boycotted Sun a long time ago, I hope they lose the suit, have to pay up, are forced to close down, and then their crappy half assed programming language and crappy OS go with Scott McNealy to live under a card board box that I can kick and piss on while I point and laugh at his mis-fortune. You'll have to excuse my rant, I hate Sun after all... but really, I hope they lose and this makes an example for other companies that are forcing American workers who went to school for jobs like these out of work.

    1. Re:About Time by DragonWyatt · · Score: 1

      You must be the proud administrator of a Solaris box running Solstice DiskSuite.

      Or iPlanet/ONE- I can't tell from your post.

      --
      Don't sweat the petty things. But do pet the sweaty things.
    2. Re:About Time by bombom · · Score: 1

      Do you understand what a H1-B means? RTFA man!

      H1Bs are people who are working for Sun *in* America, earning in dollars, playing taxes (and paying into medicare and social security, which will never provide them with benifits!) and spending dollars in the US economy.

      Next time RTFA, try to understand the diffrence between H1Bs and outsourcing to India and go get your shinebox boy.

      --
      IOException - Can't Speak
    3. Re:About Time by Dunkirk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Only on Slashdot would this get moderated as +5 Insightful. What was the insight, again, for those of us apparently dispossesed of the ability to see it?

      --
      Acts 17:28, "For in Him we live, and move, and have our being."
    4. Re:About Time by ProtonMotiveForce · · Score: 1

      Java is one of the best programming languages out there, most of the people who don't like it are either a.) idiots, or b.) sysadmins who just love to "program" in perl.

      Not that Java is perfect, but it's certainly closer than most other languages.

    5. Re:About Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does Bill Gates keep posting?

    6. Re:About Time by blincoln · · Score: 1

      I hope they lose the suit, have to pay up, are forced to close down, and then their crappy half assed programming language and crappy OS go with Scott McNealy to live under a card board box that I can kick and piss on while I point and laugh at his mis-fortune.

      Damn dude, all you need to do now is take your weapon and strike someone down with all of your anger.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    7. Re:About Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Java is one of the best programming languages out there, most of the people who don't like it are either a.) idiots

      Prove Java is better. I want to see evidence, not vague brochures with shape and animal examples stolen from Simula modeling manuals.

    8. Re:About Time by j_kenpo · · Score: 1

      I did RTFA... and to quote it...

      "By law, H-1B workers are supposed to receive the same pay US workers would get for the same jobs. But Kruz's attorney, Caputo, said this requirement can be easily evaded".

      Part of my point (not the whole point) is that they are not getting equal pay. They are getting less pay because they are "more compliant, because of their awareness of their circumstances". Which is BS. Maybe I didnt clarify that enough. Maybe I should have said "that way at least they are pumping their WHOLE DESERVED salaries back into the American economy."

      As for the rest of my comments, Sun can still kiss my ass.

    9. Re:About Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel for those older american workers. but with the kind of cut-throat competition that exists in the industry young people are surely needed.

      American teenagers have shunned the math and technology fields. Sun may not have a lot of use for the large number of NT-administrator-type that are being churned out of the community colleges. In our company we had a teenageer, a summer intern that in the course of an afternoon , downloaded a python sdk, installed it and wrote some scripts in that language. Our supervisor believed in the rule of learning 'a language-per-day'. There are lots of american teens like that , I am sure.
      Thats what is needed. I think the new wave of high-schoolers that will come out of college in the next 3-4 years will be far more code-savvy .

      Maybe Indian engineers dont have the same energy as that teenager. But a lot of them are darn good and worth it.

      All that said, I will face the same fate not too many years from now. I entered this country as a H1B. Am not sure how long that energy would be there..

  32. this sucks. by outsider007 · · Score: 1

    all my life they tell me to go into computers, I'll make the big bucks. and now american techies can't get jobs. I swear my guidance counselor couldn't have steered me wronger if she told me there's a bright future for gas station attendants.

    everyone likes to put down microsoft, but this isn't something you see them doing. and somehow they still manage to compete.

    --
    If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    1. Re:this sucks. by martone66 · · Score: 1

      If you're in the IT field for the money, maybe you're in the wrong field. Why don't you do something that you enjoy? (That leaves more jobs for us geeks :)

    2. Re:this sucks. by outsider007 · · Score: 1

      thanks for the hot tip, and too bad it's about 10 years too late. let's see how much you enjoy working for $8/hr.

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    3. Re:this sucks. by keyed · · Score: 1
      everyone likes to put down microsoft, but this isn't something you see them doing. and somehow they still manage to compete.
      They don't need to import foreign workers. Last time I checked, they have a development center in India. Why import foreign workers and pay them American wages when you can go over there, set up shop, and pay them local wages.
    4. Re:this sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "counselor couldn't have steered me wronger"

      good thing she didn't tell you to learn how to read and write.

      "everyone likes to put down microsoft"

      they've been threatening to jump ship to vancouver for five years. While keeping american workers, the only goal would be to avoid other american laws (monopolies and taxes)

  33. This happens everywhere. by Blackwulf · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Not the lawsuits, but the hiring of H1B's over US Citizens. I work in a small company (no, not the one linked to in my URL) and there are maybe 15 coders in our office.

    Three of them are US Citizens. I am one of them.

    We will see job postings go up in our break room, and submit the resume's of people we know who need jobs, but the job listings are basically a reprint of the resume of the H1B that the company has selected. So, they have all this extraneous stuff that you wouldn't use in that job, but they are considered "job requirements" and THAT is how they can tell the INS that "We can't find an equally qualified citizen."

    I guess it wouldn't be so bad if we didn't work for clients and have to travel on site, and many of our clients will ONLY want US Citizens. So, that leaves the three of us to do ALL of the travelling, even if there has been a personal tragedy in our life. (And one of us has a newborn child, so she's not travelling either...)

    I guess I can look at this a few ways. A) My life is a wreck right now because I can't stay home, but B) I have insane job security, something that is a very good thing to have in today's economy.

    1. Re:This happens everywhere. by Skyshadow · · Score: 3, Informative
      This sounds *very* framiliar. I used to work at an office in San Jose that was 95% Chinese nationals.

      Besides it being a tough environment to work in (almost all communication was in Chinese, most of the engineers spoke little to no english and my Manderin sucks except for curses), it also meant that I ended up doing all the traveling even though it wasn't in my job description. It made me miserable -- I'm just not the sort of person who enjoys flying to client sites on 24 hour notice, working in someone else's machine room, being away from home alot and etc.

      I stayed for the same reasons as you, but was eventually laid off for not coming in on Christmas day. Trust me: keep the job for now, but start looking around heavily. There are other jobs out there if you're willing to put in the work to look (aka, don't just hit Monster). I spent five months unemployed and burned through 98% of my savings, but it was worth every second and every penny to be happy at work again and have stabilized my relationships with my family.

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    2. Re:This happens everywhere. by beanyk · · Score: 1

      I guess it wouldn't be so bad if we didn't work for clients and have to travel on site, and many of our clients will ONLY want US Citizens.



      What does this mean? Is this about understanding accents, or xenophobia? Would they have a problem with, say, a Canadian citizen, or an Irish, British, or Australian one? All of these (and many others) can safely be assumed to speak English natively.

      I'm genuinely curious here ...
    3. Re:This happens everywhere. by eglamkowski · · Score: 1

      Not the lawsuits, but the hiring of H1B's over US Citizens. I work in a small company (no, not the one linked to in my URL) and there are maybe 15 coders in our office.

      Three of them are US Citizens. I am one of them.


      Anecedotal evidence.

      I worked in a company for four years and they never had more then 12 employees at a time. We NEVER hired a non-US citizen. Several times we considered some foreigners, but never actually hired any.

      My current company is mega-huge (over 70,000 employees). Of the 11 programmers in the group I work with, only 2 are foreign born, and I believe they both have US citizenship. There is another half to the group that does the web-stuff, and they also about 11 or 12 programmers, of which there are no H1B people there either.

      So there you go - you guys work in places where most of the people are H1B, I've never worked in a group with ANY H1B people. Course, I'm in da south... :-p

      --
      Government IS the problem.
    4. Re:This happens everywhere. by kiwimate · · Score: 1

      I guess it wouldn't be so bad if we didn't work for clients and have to travel on site, and many of our clients will ONLY want US Citizens. So, that leaves the three of us to do ALL of the travelling, even if there has been a personal tragedy in our life.

      Hmmm...can you say "illegal discrimination"?

      I'm kind of sensitive to these sorts of issues because I'm a non-US citizen living in the U.S., working in the technical field, but not under the H1-B program (my wife is a US citizen). I consider myself fortunate; you wouldn't guess I didn't grow up here until I spoke, and English is my first language so I'm easily understandable to other English speakers.

      Now, I understand that it's one thing to know damn well that company A will only accept a US citizen on site, and another thing to bring them up on discrimination charges, particularly if they're a paying customer. But this dismays me. Isn't America supposed to be the land of opportunity where the color of your skin and the country of your birth are irrelevant? The other thing is it hurts everyone -- you, as a US citizen, have a wreck of a life because you can't stay home, simply because your clients are xenophobic. (Having said that -- what is the rationale for not accepting non-US citizens? Lack of technical skill? Language barrier? Or simple xenophobic garbage?)

    5. Re:This happens everywhere. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if so, that's discrimination based on national origin and you can lose your magic decoder ring for that just as fast as you can lose it for race based discrimination. I'm in agreement with you.

    6. Re:This happens everywhere. by louferd · · Score: 1

      Security clearances, maybe?

    7. Re:This happens everywhere. by dragon8x4x · · Score: 1

      Usually (in my limited experience) when a company will only allow US citizens on site it's because they have a government contract, and they don't want the PITA of getting approval for foreign nationals.

    8. Re:This happens everywhere. by Blackwulf · · Score: 1
      What does this mean? Is this about understanding accents, or xenophobia? Would they have a problem with, say, a Canadian citizen, or an Irish, British, or Australian one? All of these (and many others) can safely be assumed to speak English natively.

      It's because they have contracts with the US Department of Defense. Sure, a non-US Citizen can be on site, but they have to be escorted 100% of the time. A US Citizen can get a Contractor badge and nobody has to escort him to the restroom. So, for THEM, it's easier just to have someone who can qualify for a badge than to have someone they have to babysit.

    9. Re:This happens everywhere. by gorbachev · · Score: 1

      Report your company and the decision makers to
      the INS for violating the law.

      Your bosses are nothing but common criminals.

      Proletariat of the world, unite to kill criminals

      --
      In Soviet Russia, I ruled you
    10. Re:This happens everywhere. by vsync64 · · Score: 1
      There are other jobs out there if you're willing to put in the work to look (aka, don't just hit Monster).
      Please explain in greater detail what you mean by this.

      I got laid off ~2 years ago and have been working in retail and services since then (luckily I'm in a semi-skilled position right now, but it still doesn't really pay a living wage). I've done the online thing, polishing the résumé for hours. Nothing but automated spam. I've printed everything on nice paper, put it in a folder, and gone in person to the slightest hint of an opportunity listed in the classifieds. I've talked to people in the industry and asked them to put in a good word for me.

      Despite this, nothing. I recently got rejected for 2 jobs lately. This was actually a good thing, because usually I don't hear anything back. Apparently I'm unqualified for a PC Technician position. Not a mismatch, not overqualified, underqualified.

      I don't have a degree, but I've programmed in C since before I can remember, Java since pre-1.0, and Lisp for ~3 years now. I'm a heavy Unix-head, and administer Linux and FreeBSD machines at home. I'm also not afraid to learn, to ask questions and research, and I actually take pride in reading and following specs. I suppose I'm also what they like to call a "self-starter".

      Maybe you can enlighten me on how I can be "willing to put in the work". I'm tired of getting home from work, showering, changing clothes, putting together a nice package with my résumé and everything, only to have to leave it with the secretary and never hear a thing back. I call and I'm either told "we already filled that position" or "we'll get back to you". Every day, then every few days, then every week, then once every month or so when the appeal of the pipe dream I see in the classifieds outweighs the crushing disappointment I know will be mine shortly.

      So I'll just keep working my sub-$25k/year services job and wondering if the economy will ever recover. I'll ponder the remarks of people who suggest I should get more schooling, despite the people I know who got nothing out of it but heavy debt. I already know the futility of trying to please our corporate masters; my personal projects happen to be in something other than C++, Java, or C#, and that means I'm useless, because we are all, of course, mere Pavlovian monkeys who can't have actual theoretical abstract (like, professional) knowledge and yet specialize when the job requires it.

      Sorry if I'm ranting incoherently now. It's just hard to remember when I had an apartment of my own and could do things like watch movies when I felt like it. It'd be nice if I could forget completely, but it seems I can't help being tormented by the memory of my temporary career success. Blasé remarks on Slashdot don't cheer me up.

      --
      TO BUY A NEW CAR WOULD MAKE YOU SEXUALLY ATTRACTIVE.
    11. Re:This happens everywhere. by DataSquid · · Score: 1

      So, they have all this extraneous stuff that you wouldn't use in that job, but they are considered "job requirements" and THAT is how they can tell the INS that "We can't find an equally qualified citizen."

      Well, at least in my country, that's not legal. Job requirements are called BFORs, bona fide occupational requirements. What the current employee has in this case are called KSAOs: knowledge, skills, abilities and other.

      It is not right to hire based on KSAOs that do not directly map to the BFORs in a valid way. It is in fact so wrong that there are laws about this, and if your friends were denied job offers because of this practice, they and their lawyers will have big money in their future.

      This is why it's good to take at least one HR course during your university career. Learn the laws. Learn your rights. Apply them when needed.

      --

      DataSquid.net, a little about me.
    12. Re:This happens everywhere. by Skyshadow · · Score: 1
      I'm sorry you can't find work, but I found a job in the SF Bay Area back in June, and all of the people who were laid off with me have jobs in their respective areas of expertise as well. This demonstrates that there are jobs out there.

      So don't call me blase. I know what I'm talking about here from first-hand experience.

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    13. Re:This happens everywhere. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Proletariat of the world, unite to make this guy shut up

    14. Re:This happens everywhere. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      This just shows you one of the potential problems with working at a small company. Unlike a large company, small companies can have a very strange and unique culture, since it's shaped very much by a small number of people who own the company.

      So your company possibly was more interested in having coworkers they could understand and identify with, and the other guy's company was more interested in having coworkers that were cheap and indentured.

      So small companies can sometimes be great to work for if you get along well with the owners' policies, but they can also be a real PITA to work in if you don't. Large companies tend to be more homogenous; there isn't as much difference between them.

    15. Re:This happens everywhere. by vsync64 · · Score: 1
      I'm sure it doesn't help that I'm in Colorado, which people tell me is one of the worst areas for jobs.

      So don't call me blase. I know what I'm talking about here from first-hand experience.
      As do I. I agree with the main thrust of your post; I only start taking offense when people imply that those of us who managed to fall off the gravy train are by definition second-rate, or that we are unenthusiastic about returning to our former prosperity.

      Like I said, I want advice on how you would go about it. You've been successful; I wish to sit at your feet and glean insight.

      --
      TO BUY A NEW CAR WOULD MAKE YOU SEXUALLY ATTRACTIVE.
    16. Re:This happens everywhere. by Death_Angel · · Score: 1

      "You can do anything if you try!" --Every school teacher in the world

      There are just some places and time when that doesn't work. Right now the job market sucks. This time last year there were pages of openings, and this year there are two columns of them. Around here it is relatively easy to get a job at Micky Dee's, but who wants to flip greasy beef? There are only 3 listings that are "professional" and two of those require a degree in teaching.

      --
      Bond girl numero uno!
  34. Sun support seems to be harder to understand... by Gaetano · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When I call sun for support over the last few years, it seems that they are more often indian and difficult to understand. I really can't stand having to ask for the same instruction 5 times to be able to understand what they are telling me. I think perhaps this is why an indian speaking support engineer is 75% more likely to email me the procedures they are asking me to perform.

    I would hang up and try to get someone who speaks english more clearly if I had the time to do so when the raid array on the oracle server is acting up and I have lots of people pissed off.

    My opinion of the (very expensive) support sun offers has taken a turn for the worse because of this. I don't mind speaking to an indian or any other person as long as they speak english clearly when I call the english support line.

    1. Re:Sun support seems to be harder to understand... by NetJunkie · · Score: 1

      I agree. This has shown up in the HP/Compaq move to offshore call centers recently. I've had a hard time understanding some of the techs. The problem is that it's hard enough to learn another language for normal conversation, but now it's in a technical environment where it's hard to work around language barriers. I can only give you the exact error one way. You can only give me the exact command one way. There isn't room to work around that.

    2. Re:Sun support seems to be harder to understand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most companies tech support is going this route. Compaq/HP desktop support seems to be staffed in India now, which drives our poor PC techs nuts trying to get resolution.
      We mentioned to our sales rep that we are considering switching to Dell.. and somehow our calls tended to get routed to more understandable and knowledgable staff.

      The HP calls for storage and servers usually end up with somebody who knows what to do, presumably because they know how important it is to not piss off their commercial customers. Last call got routed to a techn in Toronto.. which was fine up until he let loose with "that firmware is unsupported, eh." and then I had to mute the phone and laugh.

      A recent call to RSA/Security put me in the hands of an Indian gentleman who apparently just learned English last week, and tried to speak it at about thirty words per second... and yes, he just emailed me a bunch of procedures which didn't make any sense either.. didn't even seem related to the task at hand. For that sort of money I want somebody to answer the phone in English, sorry if that makes me a racist, but I was seriously tempted to try calling their Canada or England or Germany support lines instead.

      Sun support for me has been fair I guess.. but I try to do it all through the SRS Online site so I don't have to call it in. Usually our Sun calls are "this hardware is borked, send a new one" so it works ok.

    3. Re:Sun support seems to be harder to understand... by psyconaut · · Score: 1

      Feeling a little xenophobic today? You probably complain that the guy at 7-Eleven doesn't speak the Queen's English too, right?

      -psy

    4. Re:Sun support seems to be harder to understand... by dukerobillard · · Score: 1
      Eventually, you'll learn to understand the accent better, and then it'll be okay.

      You can't fight this...it's like people who complain that their job requires them to use a computer now, when it didn't used to and they hate computers. That's the way it is. Adapt to the changes.

    5. Re:Sun support seems to be harder to understand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Feeling a little xenophobic today? You probably complain that the guy at 7-Eleven doesn't speak the Queen's English too, right?

      I've had some problems understanding some of them before. "Slurrah Peah? What? Oh, Slurpee!"

    6. Re:Sun support seems to be harder to understand... by Gaetano · · Score: 1

      I don't know if I would call it something one needs to "fight" but you can make yourself heard. Every time I get follow-up call asking if I was satisfied with my support experiance I say how satisfied I was.

      If I couldn't understand the person on the other end I'm not satisfied and "No Mr. Faceless Survey Questionare Person, I would not recommend sun support based on my experiance with support". Enough people say so and someone is going to make the right decision as to what they need to do to keep their customers, and if they don't then customers will go somewhere else. That includes me.

      Accents are one thing, not being able to communicate is another. Especially when I punch in the buttons on my phone that indicate "Critical; System Down or Unusable"

    7. Re:Sun support seems to be harder to understand... by bfields · · Score: 1
      I don't mind speaking to an indian or any other person as long as they speak english clearly when I call the english support line.

      They speak English clearly enough. Chances are they were educated entirely in English--they just don't speak the dialect you're used to. There are something like 400 million native English speakers in the world, and most of them weren't brought up with your home dialect.

      You can continue to refuse to make any real attempt to communicate with anyone who grew up outside your home town. Or you can take the minimal effort it requires to learn to understand English as it's spoken by literate, educated people from India, or New Zealand, or, for that matter, England. Your choice.

      Welcome to the global community.

      --Bruce F.

    8. Re:Sun support seems to be harder to understand... by sdcharle · · Score: 1
      That was a cheap shot. In something like support, being able to communicate effectively is essential to doing a good job.

      Inability to speak English properly or speaking with a thick accent compromises quality, whether the person in question is from another country or just from Boston.

    9. Re:Sun support seems to be harder to understand... by psyconaut · · Score: 1

      I would hazzard a guess that there are many English (as in the country) people who speak perfectly good English that you would not be able to understand too. One could argue that they also (probably) speak "better" English than your good self.

      I would suggest that the reason you have trouble understanding Indian's speaking English is NOT because they are unintelligible, but because you haven't been exposed to people speaking English with accents. Which does indeed tend to make your comments a little xenophobic. And the Boston comment just goes to prove this even more.

      -psy

    10. Re:Sun support seems to be harder to understand... by sdcharle · · Score: 1
      No, the Boston comment goes to show I was being facetious.

      I could care less about accents, I've been in the tech or science world for years, and met folks with all kinds of accents, pretty much understood them all, even the New Englanders and people from The American South. It just takes a little effort and patience, that's all.

      I was just defending the person you responded to and his point. When you call tech support because people are screaming at you, patience may be in short supply.

      Anyhow, you seem keen on making assumptions about people and patting yourself on the back for that, but at least you aren't a xenophobe. sigh. Whatever, chief. Keep on Dukes Of Hazzarding guesses about people and stuff.

    11. Re:Sun support seems to be harder to understand... by yoshi_mon · · Score: 1

      Chances are they were educated entirely in English--they just don't speak the dialect you're used to.

      Speaking as someone who is world traveled, has worked telephone support, has a relative who is a speech pathologist, and is currently learning a foreign language I can say that there is a great deal of difference between knowing a language and speaking is properly.

      You can get an example of this by going into any "ghetto" and listen to what my relative calls Ebonics. It's English all right, but if I called up for support that I was paying for and had to try and decipher that, I would demand a refund.

      I'm not trying to discount those who have learned English and are trying to make the best for themselves and their families, but you can clearly hear the difference between someone who has been taught English but does not know how to pronounce things correctly and someone who does.

      You can continue to refuse to make any real attempt to communicate with anyone who grew up outside your home town. Or you can take the minimal effort it requires to learn to understand English as it's spoken by literate, educated people from India, or New Zealand, or, for that matter, England. Your choice.

      This is not about xenophobia or whatever your trying to make this sound like, this is when a person has paid for support in a language that they know. To make things more complicated we are dealing with many technical terms that make precise understanding all the more important. (Did you say rm -r? Are you sure?) You can wave the banner about how it's important to learn new things about even someone's own native language, but this is not about us learning, it's about getting information that you have paid for clearly and concisely.

      --

      Really, I know what I'm doing...Ohhhh, look at the shiny buttons!
    12. Re:Sun support seems to be harder to understand... by bfields · · Score: 1
      Speaking as someone who is world traveled, has worked telephone support, has a relative who is a speech pathologist, and is currently learning a foreign language I can say that there is a great deal of difference between knowing a language and speaking is properly.

      Would you claim that an Indian who speaks English as their native tongue is not "speaking it properly" because the dialect of English that they speak is not your dialect? You're likely to have difficulty understanding an English speaker who is a native speaker from London, for exactly the same reasons; are you also going to try to claim that the English don't speak English properly?

      It's not as though the English spoken by, say, the average white native of Michigan, is the One True Dialect. The English they speak in London or Delhi is not some inferior corrupted form of the language you were brought up with.

      This is not about xenophobia or whatever your trying to make this sound like, this is when a person has paid for support in a language that they know.

      You paid for support in "English". If the person really has poor English then you've got a legitimate complaint. If it's just that you can't make the adjustment to a slightly different dialect from yours then that's your problem.

    13. Re:Sun support seems to be harder to understand... by yoshi_mon · · Score: 1

      Would you claim that an Indian who speaks English as their native tongue is not "speaking it properly" because the dialect of English that they speak is not your dialect? You're likely to have difficulty understanding an English speaker who is a native speaker from London, for exactly the same reasons; are you also going to try to claim that the English don't speak English properly?

      True that English is spoken thoughout the world and many speak it as their 1st language, but in reference to this thread I think we can all agree that we are refering to American English. If I call overseas and I get Indian English, so be it, but if I call an American helpdesk, I expect American English.

      You paid for support in "English". If the person really has poor English then you've got a legitimate complaint. If it's just that you can't make the adjustment to a slightly different dialect from yours then that's your problem.

      Again, not trying to bash anyone who has learned another language and is trying to get it right. I'm on my 3rd langauge and it's still tough. It's hard to explain what is heard in a format that is only written, but suffice to say that again, if someone speaks to me in a form of English that is so far away from American English then they might as well be speaking another language.

      --

      Really, I know what I'm doing...Ohhhh, look at the shiny buttons!
  35. Meta comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Regardless of the importance or interest in this topic, I fail to see how it relates to YRO (Your Rights Online). I'm anonymizing(?) since this will undoubtedly be dinged as off-topic.

  36. this happens all the time by AssFace · · Score: 1

    My previous company did this in order to stay afloat. And the company before that tried to farm off as much as possible to their office in India. Initially they were farming out to India in hopes that they would do the work while we slept, and vice versa... but it turned into a logistical trainwreck - so instead they would have them write the bulk of the code and then we would go through and clean up where they messed up. The particular programmers we had over there sucked ass, so largely we had to rewrite everything that they ever did.
    Where I work now is very weird in that we are all dirty Americans.

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
  37. H1B has to change by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Right now H1B workers are basically indentured servants to the corporations who hire them. Corporations can make them work in tiny cubicles for 80 hours a week and the workers' choice is basically to suck it up or to quit and risk being sent back. The corporations are not upset with this situation.

    The reason for getting an H1B is that the worker supposedly has skills that cannot be found in America. In reality, most of the time this skill is the ability to work for meager pay. If we follow the spirit of H1B, the worker is valuable to the US economy because of his special skills, not just to one corporation.

    It's time to let H1B recipients have the right to change jobs, demand more pay, and be treated like [american] humans. US workers should not fear this unless they lack skills themselves - all it will do is dry up the pool of conscripted foreigners. US corporations should not fear this, unless they intend to treat H1B workers poorly - good corporations should be able to retain American and H1B employees.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:H1B has to change by linzeal · · Score: 1

      And the middle management is usually a vindictive ex h1-b who thinks that if he had to go through it everyone else does to, or some idiot joe from a telco or some vaguely technical industry that has no scruples put the tack down on them foreign folk.

    2. Re:H1B has to change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Shut up, you make way too much sense around here. The complaint around Slashdot is supposed to be that US workers are lazy and pricing themselves out of jobs - not that US companies are bringing in foreigners from poverty sticken countries and having them work like mules for ridiculously low wages.

    3. Re:H1B has to change by justinbigelow · · Score: 1

      "It's time to let H1B recipients have the right to change jobs, demand more pay, and be treated like [american] humans."

      Actually I'd say its time to put some serious effort into making the next generation of American youth competetive in the engineering and scientific market. The point of H1-B is to find the skills lacking in domestic labor. We have ourselves to blame as well as unscrupulous exploitative corporations like Sun.

      Justin

    4. Re:H1B has to change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      H1B's can change jobs, that part was changed a year or two ago. What they can't do is transfer their green card application, so if they change jobs, the green card process must begin anew. Since it often takes 5-6 years to get a green card, which just so happens to match that 6 year maximum stay on the H1B visa, people who want their green cards are still effectively indentured. Those who don't care, have as much freedom as american citizens do in the job market.

    5. Re:H1B has to change by gosand · · Score: 1, Insightful
      First you say:

      Right now H1B workers are basically indentured servants to the corporations who hire them. Corporations can make them work in tiny cubicles for 80 hours a week and the workers' choice is basically to suck it up or to quit and risk being sent back. The corporations are not upset with this situation.

      Then you say:

      It's time to let H1B recipients have the right to change jobs, demand more pay, and be treated like [american] humans.

      In all seriousness, what you said in the first paragraph applies to American workers as well. Right now I don't know too many tech people who are out there looking to change jobs, because there aren't any. Demanding more pay? This ain't 1998. If you have a job, you do what they tell you because there isn't much of a job market.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    6. Re:H1B has to change by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Actually I'd say its time to put some serious effort into making the next generation of American youth competetive in the engineering and scientific market. The point of H1-B is to find the skills lacking in domestic labor. We have ourselves to blame as well as unscrupulous exploitative corporations like Sun.

      What? Our youth is perfectly competent in the tech arena. It's just that kids today are (hopefully) seeing the light: get a tech degree and work at the GAP while the job you thought you had goes to China or India. This is the consequence of outsourcing so many tech and engineering jobs - nobody is willing to do it locally because they can't live on the wages it pays.

      To respond to your point about H1-B, I call bullshit. We have plenty of workers in this country that can do the work. Companies just like low-paid indentured servants more.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    7. Re:H1B has to change by CrisDias · · Score: 1

      Well, you actually *can* change jobs with your H1B. The visa belongs to the employee, not the company. Of course you have to stay in the same field (IT) etc. but you can find another job.

      And do I have to remind everyone that if a company offers less-than-market pay to a H1-B candidate the INS rejects the visa application?

    8. Re:H1B has to change by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      It's time to let H1B recipients have the right to change jobs, demand more pay, and be treated like [american] humans.

      Fine. If they want that, they can go get a valid visa, and come over here and apply for a job just like the rest of us. Don't sneak in through a loophole, and then expect the same level of assistance as a native, or someone who has done the whole standard visa deal.

    9. Re:H1B has to change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but the stakes are much higher for H1B holders. Imagine coming to this country, getting a college education, working for 3 years and then in a second your life is taken away when you're laid off. You have to _leave_ the country in which you have lived the last 8 years immediately.

    10. Re:H1B has to change by justinbigelow · · Score: 1

      "To respond to your point about H1-B, I call bullshit. We have plenty of workers in this country that can do the work. Companies just like low-paid indentured servants more."

      That was my point. The way it is supposed to work and the way it currently works are two different things. However if our schools focused as much on math and science as other countries we would have an over abundance of technically skilled citizens and the corporations wouldnt be able to bullshit congress about the lack of qualified domestic labor.

    11. Re:H1B has to change by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      if our schools focused as much on math and science as other countries we would have an over abundance of technically skilled citizens

      We do have an overabundance of technically skilled citizens - the unemployment rate is probably around 10% right now. There isn't anything wrong with our school system, aside from the overabundance of administrators and lack of proper funding: we have also been overproducing MS and PHD students for a while.

      the corporations wouldnt be able to bullshit congress about the lack of qualified domestic labor.

      That doesn't follow. Bullshitting congress involves money and disinformation, both of which are orthogonal to reality. It doesn't help that tech people tend not to be political.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    12. Re:H1B has to change by who+what+why · · Score: 1

      As a former H1B programmer, I have to say that indentured servitude is a fact. H1B workers cannot change jobs quickly. The labor laws in many states don't offer much protection to anyone, therefore a lot of salaried workers put in incredibly long hours for mediocre pay and conditions. The difference for me was that if I was fired (or perhaps more likely, just laid off), I'd have had 10 days to say goodbye to my friends, try to wriggle out of the lease on my apartment, placate my girlfriend and help her move to a smaller place, and then leave the country.

      And if the threat wasn't enough, how about the certainty that after 6 years here, when I was finally settled, I'd have to leave anyway! Who makes these rules up? H1Bs aren't fair to the foreign workers, they are often unfair to local workers, they are even not in the best interest of the US economy as a whole. They are designed to help big business (since small businesses can't afford the legal fees to deal with the INS).

      The people to blame here are the corrupt politicians who constantly pass laws that may seem innocuous but almost inevitably are just favors for big business.

    13. Re:H1B has to change by vanguard · · Score: 1

      There isn't much of a job market because the influx of H1B workers has increased the pool of available employees to unnatural levels. At the same time the number of employees continues to be inflated by importing labor the number of jobs is actually shrinking.

      Vanguard

      --
      That which does not kill me only makes me whinier
    14. Re:H1B has to change by Trejus · · Score: 1

      There's another side to the H1B issues that often gets overlooked by the slashdot audience. I guess it's because the majority of people who post here are tech workers and not business owners.

      My dad used to run a computer consulting company which specialized in powerbuilder and AS/400. Circa 1997 it became very difficult to find people willing to work on AS/400 consulting at resonable raates. Not meager rates, i think they would still earn about $35 - $40 an hour. But most American applicants were either totally unqualified, or demanded a ridiculous amount of money that clients would not pay. Hence, he had to resort to using the H1B program. He figured that since he was an immigrated Indian it would not be difficult to find good quality people and bring them here.

      This turned out to be a total disaster. Of the 5 he ended up hiring over the course of 2 years, 1 was incompetant, 1 got depressed and had to return home, and the rest jumped ship once some other company offered them a few dollars more an hour.

      Granted, it may feel like indentured servitude for the worker, but many people don't really understand the costs that go into getting an H1B into your company. You need to hire a lawyer that specializes in visa issues. Screening applicants is extremely difficult to do remotely, and the business has to invest in trips abroad. Plane tickets are expensive, even more so when a leg condition forces you to fly business class only. And you still have to pay them an average wage. If an American jumps ship, you just lose the training costs, which are probably half the total cost for an H1B for a period of less than a year.

      There are so many costs that go into recruiting one individual, that it makes sense that there should be protection for the company from an employee leaving the company high and dry. Forcing the H1B to restart the greencard processes is that protection.

      The bottom line is that the H1B program can get ugly for everybody involved. There are lots of problems with it, and it's not as simple as saying "it's slavery and exploitation." There are two sides to the issue, and tons of propoganda on both.

      --
      "To save the planet, I had to go to the worst spot on Earth, and that was Philadelphia." -- Sun Ra
    15. Re:H1B has to change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh??? H-1B is a valid visa.

  38. Re:Nothing wrong this this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    americans are unproductive?
    fuck off indian mother fucker go back to the hell hole you came from.

  39. Suspend H1B program by TheRealStyro · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The H1B visa program should be suspended and/or severely limited due to the current state of the economy and unemployment. Any time the local labor is being replaced by foreign labor something illegal must be happening. Sure, if the locals are a bunch of lazy and strike-prone union members, and no other local will cross the picket lines, then hire whoever is available. Otherwise skilled local labor should always be hired first.

    --
    1. Re:Suspend H1B program by MightyTribble · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'd argue that the H1 program should just be *enforced*. H1Bs, as written in law, *require* the visa holder to be paid prevailing wages, and *require* something called 'Labor Certification', which supposedly proves that there are no available native workers in the local market who can perform those functions.

      Fees are paid by the hiring company that supposedly pay for enforcement. However, it's clear that the Dept of Labor (that handles the labor certification process) is woefully underfunded and unskilled, and that imigration lawyers can (legally!) game the system just by writing the applications in a certain way. DoL sees language they recognise, and rubber-stamps the application because they don't have the resources to check it out.

      If the legislation was properly enforced, this would be a non-issue. The H1-B laws are actually pretty good.

    2. Re:Suspend H1B program by TheShadow · · Score: 1

      I agree. However, I've been looking a lot of job postings on Monster lately, and quite a few of them clearly state that the company will NOT sponsor H1B visas. So, I think parts of the industry are pushing back on foreign workers.

      It is my contention that really good engineers from India or whatever other country that come into the US will demand to be paid the same as their equally talented American counterparts. Eventually, companies fishing for cheap labor will realize they are getting what they paid for.

      --

      --
      "What do you want me to do? Whack a guy? Off a guy? Whack off a guy? Cause I'm married."
    3. Re:Suspend H1B program by Gnank · · Score: 1

      The H-1B has nothing to do with the labor certification, k?
      The labor certification is a process by which a foreign worker, who may or may not be present in the U.S. on an H-1B temporary visa, can get a green card (permanent residence). The employer files the labor certification and has to prove that no qualified U.S. workers are available for the job.
      That said, yeah, it's pretty easy, at least for larger employers who can do a lot of recruiting, to get a labor cert approved.

    4. Re:Suspend H1B program by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      Why not force the company that wants to hire a H1B to pay 4x the prevailing wage per year ( in additional taxes / to the local college to increase tech learning / to the fund paying all the unemployed techs ... )

      The H1B was designed as a relief valve so if a company absolutely could not find someone to do a job they could get someone so the company could continue to work. If Sun honestly can't find Java programmers (or whatever) locally let them import all the Indians they want, but make them pay a $200,000 yearly fee for each one.

      Seems to enforce the spirit and the letter of the law.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    5. Re:Suspend H1B program by MightyTribble · · Score: 1

      Huh. That's weird. 'Cuz we had to file with the DoL for my H1B. Also for my green card, but we had to classify my H1 job according to DoL labor cert guidelines, too.

    6. Re:Suspend H1B program by h4x0r-3l337 · · Score: 1

      There are currently about 5 million high tech jobs. There are about .5 million H-1B workers currently in the US. The majority of H-1B visas are issued for high tech jobs. If every H-1B worker took a job away from an American, half a million American high tech workers would be out of a job, representing 10% of the total.
      Let's play with those numbers a bit more, and consider Silicon Valley. Let's pretend that Santa Clara county's record 7.9% unemployment rate applies to the entire SF Bay Area, that all 5 million hightech jobs are available there, and all .5 million H-1B workers work there, taking jobs away from Americans. In this worst-case scenario, we have 5 million total jobs, with 4.5 million of those occupied by Americans, and .5 million occupied by H-1B workers. Since unemployment rate is 7.9% we can calculate that there is a total of 4,886,000 American workers available, 386,000 of them (7.9%) being unemployed in this sector. You could theoretically achieve 100% employment by sending home 386,000 H-1B employees, and replacing them with Americans. You would still need 114,000 H-1B employees to fill all jobs.
      However, if we consider that even an extremely healthy economy will have an unemployment rate of 1-2%, we don't need to go that far. In order to bring unemployment among American high tech workers down to 1%, you would send 337,000 H-1B workers away. You would then have 4,837,000 American workers, 163,000 H-1B employees, and 49000 high tech unemployed Americans.
      Of course, the US economy is not healty at all. If we restate our goal to reducing unemployment in the high tech sector to the same level as the rest of the economy, the numbers change again. In order to bring unemployment in our high tech example down to 5% (nationwide average is 5.8), we only need to send home 142,000 H-1B workers, leaving 358,000 H-1B workers, 4,642,000 Americans working, and 244,000 high tech unemployed Americans.

    7. Re:Suspend H1B program by Gnank · · Score: 1

      The H-1B does have a DOL requirement. It's called a Labor Condition Application. You get this approved before filing the H-1B application with [what used to be called] INS.
      When an employer files a labor certification for the green card, they will take great care in how the position is described for max chance of success. Employers will often also make sure the H-1B documentation matches the labor certification in case the DOL decides to look at the underlying documenation (although I don't know that this has ever happened), or the employer does it just for the sake of consistency.

    8. Re:Suspend H1B program by Mr.+McGibby · · Score: 1

      Actually, these are probably the very positions that are being held or going to be held by a H1B. The truth is that they found their H1B in other ways already and now are fulfilling the requirement to NOT find another qualified worker.

      --
      Mad Software: Rantings on Developing So
  40. not the first time Walter Kruz has made a stink by smitty45 · · Score: 1

    check it here, where he made the same claim in 1993:

    http://groups.google.com/groups?q=%22Walter+Kruz %2 2&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=1993Mar18.15305 3.28942%40samba.oit.unc.edu&rnum=2

    someone show me statistics that proves suits like this aren't the result of bunch of whiners who lost their job.

    1. Re:not the first time Walter Kruz has made a stink by technomom · · Score: 1

      My first thought on reading that Mr. Kruz had been with Sun for only 1 1/2 years was, "He's 52. Where was he before Sun?" Not too many 52 year old rookies out there. Thanks for answering the question.

      Wondering who he complained about between 1993 and 2003?

      JoAnn

    2. Re:not the first time Walter Kruz has made a stink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, so anyone who stands up for himself and/or other people more then once is a whiner?

      Is there some sort of system on being fucked over that says it'll only happen once?

      Has only one thing gone wrong in your life?

      Personally, I've had alot of trouble with employers trying to get away with stuff (at times illegal stuff, contrary to our labour code (Canada)).

      Before you try to blame this on my work ethic, I pride myself on working hard (both in blue collar, and white), and vowed when I first entered the job market to never have anyone carry me.

      All the anti-union rhetoric out there gets to me too. I'm not blind to not see that there is major problems with unions, including policies that have hurt me at times, but I also realize without them companies A LOT of the time will try and squeeze a man as much as possible... and then if he can't squeeze no more, move on to the next person. Unions need to drop the dead weight they carry and then maybe they wouldn't have such a bad rep (plus it would be easier for people to get decent union jobs)

      The companies have alot of leverage against the employees they use, and if they had fair practices, there never would have been a need for unions in the first place.

      As for the H-1B's, and the people who think it's ok for companies to do such things, I ask you: Is it ok for companies to enjoy the rights and benefits that the United States gives them without paying their fair share back in? Is it right for them to screw over American workers while profitting off them at the same time?

      Wake up people, without limits on capitalism we'll end up in another aristocratic/peasant like state (and we all know how most of those ended.)

      No one should have the right to an empire built on the backs of slaves.

    3. Re:not the first time Walter Kruz has made a stink by smitty45 · · Score: 1

      standing up for oneself does not make one a whiner, no. has anything gone wrong more than once in my life ? yes. but being dramatic and saying that allowing H-1b visas are 'building an empire on the backs of slaves' is just that: dramatic. i was asking for the statistics. when a company fires someone, and then hires a foreigner for the same position for smaller pay, then no, i don't agree or condone that. but what if the company DOESN'T backfill the job for months, then hires a H1-B visa ? isn't that fair ? how long do YOU think that companies should have to wait ? or maybe you're against ANY foreign peoples trying to find a job here. what about a US company who fires someone because they suck as an employee ? and then hires an H1-B because they are are best candidate for the job ? what about a US company who has an overseas office, and hires a citizen of that country ? what then ? empires built on slaves, you say ? if you think that there aren't people who are using the H1-B visa issue to further their own interests after being fired, you are fooling yourself. i personally don't believe that it's balanced either way, but to say that all companies (and the H1-B visas themselves) are evil and bad...well that's just (again) dramatic and wrong.

    4. Re:not the first time Walter Kruz has made a stink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I should have actually replied to a reply of your posting.

      First off, you're stating stuff that you didn't originally post, which there is NO WAY I could have responded to then.

      No, I am not against hiring foreigners if the job cannot be filled by citizens... if I was it'd be very hypocritical since I oppose outsourcing, and if they can't find the workers in their country, that justifies that beyond even my arguements.

      My comment on building empires of the backs of slaves was a response to ABUSE of H-1B's, not of their legitimate usage.

      Some people will use any excuse to further their own issues.. this is a well known fact, and isn't any better then a company abusing it.

      If a company has an overseas office, then there is no reason at all why they shouldn't hire people from that country to work in that office... to support that country and it's people. Also, nothing wrong with hiring a small ammount of people from that country to work inside the companies head office (say America) to act as a liason between the two... since I'd assume that said person would have good knowledge of the markets/economy/peoples of the other country (getting confusing, eh?) where the company works.

      I disagree with the constant abuse/workarounds/illegal activities I see by employers, and the fact that most people either turn a blind eye to it, or DEFEND it as being "capitalism, deal with it".

      Most people don't care about workers rights, and even human rights, the success of Nike proves it.

    5. Re:not the first time Walter Kruz has made a stink by smitty45 · · Score: 1

      i see and agree with some of what you say.

      but my main point is...until you can say, unequivocally, that "evil" companies are *replacing* US workers with H1-B visas, then it's hard to place blame on that being the reason why people get fired.

      what i see on slashdot ALL the time about H1 visa issues is people complaining that they lost their job due to a foreigner, and that is taken to be truth, when the reality is that every case is not only different, but most likely unprovable.

      also, as some posters point out, companies that hire H1 visas have, in most cases, found out that it is sometimes not worth the trouble dealing with, and since the candidate pool is so large these days, they prefer NOT to hire H1 visa candidates.

      i also disagree that most people don't care about worker's rights...on the contrary, most people DO. this country has the largest (rivaling the power of organized crime gangs) worker's rights-oriented organizations in the WORLD. unions, guilds....these are the things that keep people employed up until the very last moment possible.

      and you can't mix that with human rights...that is a completely other issue entirely, and while related, anything that happens across our borders, VERY unfortunately (as in the case with Nike) is not paid attention to by the US labor organizations.

      my original question (and i'm still trying to answer) was: where are the statistics for this ? and how can you tell the difference between a company "replacing" a perfectly performing US worker with a H1-B visa candidate because it was cheaper, and someone who complains about getting fired for some legit reason, whose position was filled later by a H1-B visa ?

      this is the allegation that most of the bitter posters today have been posting about, and that i have a problem with.

  41. Outsource management! by ph1ll · · Score: 1
    The most expensive and easily replacable part of a company are the people with soft skills - eg management and sales people.


    Why don't we bring these people into America?

    --
    --- "We've always been at war with Eastasia."
  42. Difference was ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Immigrants back then got citezenship. H1-B is a slave labor law. They can not vote. They can not form unions. They are here based on their masters whim. Not exactly 1840 when the Democratic party had immigrants voting in the next election.

  43. Not surpised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not surpising. Take my company who shall be namelss for an example. They are going to hire more people in India, however, in order to balance the department budget, they are saying if people from US leave the group for whatever the reason ("UNDERPERFORM", quit, leaving for another group), the job will be shifted to India. The logic is that the salary of an US engineer is equal to 3 Indian engineers. The management claim that this is an international company therefore we all have to deal with global economy.

    My personal opinion aside, I wonder how much India managers gets paid vs. US managers and maybe it's more cost effect to shift the management jobs there too

  44. 2 sides ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My company regularly places H1-B workers in contract positions.

    In order for a company to use an H1-B worker ( and hence displace a US worker) they have to show that no US citizen is able to do that job.
    Sun merely broke these rules that are there to protect US workers rights.

    However it is a 2 sided coin. In order for the H1-B workers to stay and work in the US they have to be sponsored, and once a company sponsors you , you are pretty much an indentured servant until you have a green card (5 years ???). Many H1-Bs work on a 1099 basis for low wages without medical insurance for this duration until they have a green card. Many are sent home because these sponsorships are almost impossible to transfer from company to company (in case of layoffs)

    The upside for SUN is that once an H1-B worker is in place they have a fixed wage for quite some time. And possibly someone who will work harder because so much more is riding on thier job status.

    The downside is the US workers are *actually* being displaced by those ready to accept 3rd world wages and no benefits.

    *

  45. Re:Nothing wrong this this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am not Indian. I am American. You can suck on my huge cock.

    And yes Americans are unproductive. Go read some studies fucker. It is a known fact. The British, German, Japanese and even the French are mor productive than the Americans.

    Why do the Eurpeans get so much time off - for vacations, like 3 months? Cuz they are productive. They earn it.

    So once again you can suck my cock

  46. This is all wrong by one9nine · · Score: 1
    I thought you were supposed to bring in entry level graduates and farm work out to Singapore?

    They obvoiusly didn't bring in any efficiency experts to help with this decision. This is certianly not good for the company.

    1. Re:This is all wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder how many got the movie reference you were going for? Red swingline anybody...

  47. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  48. Why it's illegal by (54)T-Dub · · Score: 5, Insightful

    as found on this [doleta.gov] site. Foreign labor certification programs are generally designed to assure that the admission of foreign workers to work in the United States on a permanent or temporary basis will not adversely affect the job opportunities, wages and working conditions of American workers.

    --

    "I can not bring myself to believe that if knowledge presents danger, the solution is ignorance" - Isaac Asimov
    1. Re:Why it's illegal by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      as found on this [doleta.gov] [doleta.gov] site. Foreign labor certification programs are generally designed to assure that the admission of foreign workers to work in the United States on a permanent or temporary basis will not adversely affect the job opportunities, wages and working conditions of American workers.

      So? There is very little inspection and enforcement. It is a paper game of cat and mouse. Like somebody said, this is the same government that checks "prior art" on patent applications.

      "Generally designed" does not help either. Why not "must"?

  49. Of Course! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where do you think that OpenOffice comes from?

  50. Economy by tomgarcher · · Score: 1

    I can't help thinking that companies might be shooting themselves in the foot here. If you fire your workforce and move all the jobs to India then who is going to buy your products in the US? Presumably you'll have such trouble selling your stuff you'll need to cut costs even more and move everything to China!
    It has been going this way for years and I wonder how long it will be before we have an economic collapse that will make todays woes look like a tea party.

    1. Re:Economy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a well known and well recognized problem which will eventually become serious.

      As companies (e.g. Ford or GM) move jobs out of the country the people who lost those jobs can no longer afford to buy new cars or trucks. Those potential customers are lost, possibly forever.

      But the companies reduce their cost of manufacturing by such a large amount that they greatly increase their profit on each vehicle. They layoff 50,000 workers and lose all 50,000 people as future customers but there are still a hundred million prospective customers left and they're making more profit per vehicle. This is no problem for Ford or GM. As a side note, the foreign workers probably never make enough to buy the vehicles they're building and the price of the product to the remaining purchasers is not reduced to reflect the reduced costs. The only benefit is to the company in terms of increased profit and to the foreigners who now have jobs.

      The problem kicks in and becomes acute when Ford and GM layoff workers to move manufacturing out of the country and then Hoover and RCA and Electrolux and Chrysler and Levis Strauss and lots of other companies do the same. As the collective purchasing power of the American workforce is reduced they eventually stop buying cars and trucks and TVs and vacuum cleaners and blue jeans and concentrate on feeding their families and not getting evicted.

      While that is happening more and more companies start jumping offshore to reduce costs which increases the magnitude of the problem. This is the economic death spiral that we can probably look forward to as multi-nationals export the wealth of this country. Too bad for us. Enjoy life while you can still afford it.

  51. Hopefully the courts will wake up by portwojc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    H-1B visa are fine and dandy when there is a shortage of workers. However at this time there isn't such a shortage. Unless of course you count wanting to favor a certain group or find the cheapest possible workers.

    Now now. I quote from the article to defend my first claim.

    citing as evidence statements made this year by Sun's Indian-born cofounder, Vinod Khosla, on the CBS television program ''60 Minutes.'' Khosla was quoted as saying that at Sun, people from India ''are favored over almost anybody else.''


    The second is this site www.fuckthatjob.com. Some of those reports are just sad... Companies want everything for as close to nothing - and some want it for free. Work for us for free till you find a job keep your skills sharp.

    Of course companies will just move operations totally overseas. They do it to avoid taxes they'll do it to pay a real wage. Of course eventually whatever country they move to will catch up. That or the customers will get tired of asking "Could you repeat that please".

    1. Re:Hopefully the courts will wake up by rjethmal · · Score: 1
      Now now. I quote from the article to defend my first claim. citing as evidence statements made this year by Sun's Indian-born cofounder, Vinod Khosla, on the CBS television program ''60 Minutes.'' Khosla was quoted as saying that at Sun, people from India ''are favored over almost anybody else.''
      Khosla's statement was taken out of context; when he said that on 60 minutes he was referring to graduates of IIT, which is a VERY good, tough as hell institute, I mean, IIT graduates are the kids that have MIT and Harvard as their safety schools!
      --
      Push the envelope. Watch it bend. -Tool
  52. Re:Slashdot "Capitalists'" Hypocrisy by aksansai · · Score: 1

    I'm interested to read about the terms of their severence packages. Many people who want the package must also sign a waiver to not sue or come against the company, its partners, or its interests.

    I've been laid off before in the software sector only to find that the company began a new hiring spree a few months later - but the severence package was extremely generous all things considered.

    *shrug*

    --
    Ayup
  53. ohh ya, that's it. by wrfink · · Score: 1

    Oh sure, it's the American Workers fault. What about the CEO, CIO, CFO, and FUCK-O that is paid an exorbitant salary/bonus/stock package. Now, factor the American way of life. Is it that far off to expect a higher salary too? Since IT is the nerve center of any business, are tech worker any less-valuable than accountants or lawyers? No. Now, how about these "Consulting" companies that bill-out at $100-$300 per hour...and the fact that many of these "Fresh-out-of-college" mba monkeys are on-par (or lower) with the companies own IT staff. With that...what do you expect? Yea, life's a bitch, then you learn you can make more money with a union job than engineering a multi-tiered, distributed, web-based, enterprise application.

    1. Re:ohh ya, that's it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Yea, life's a bitch, then you learn you can make more money with a union job than engineering a multi-tiered, distributed, web-based, enterprise application."

      Exactly, and with the union job you gain 5 years of experiance and money instead of 5 years spending thousands of dollars on a degree that does not gain you anything. I studied long nights so I could get a degree and a job doing what I love to do. Now I work at a job I hate making the same money as (starting) union workers because of this. And for some reason the people in management and sales keep getting more money. Lets outsource management or sales.

    2. Re:ohh ya, that's it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly! Let's start firing american CEO's for cheaper Indian management and watch the crap hit the fan. I'm waiting for the post office syndrom, when the employees get angry and kill the CEO's. Then we'll all wonder how this could have happened. Just look at the pay these CEO's recieve for this shit. We are farming out all our manufacturing base, importing all our engineers and dumbing down our schools. We are getting to the stage where we consume, but don't produce. How long do you think that can last? How long will we put up with corporate & political greed raping our countries future and stealing millions. While honest hard working americans go deeper & deeper into debt. How long until the bubble really bursts? The best way to stop this is to unanimously vote in a viable third party and dump the other two political parties, and not re-elect a single incumbent into office. Then watch these idiots currently in office screem bloody murder! The only problem with that solution is that all the "third party" candidates we've had in the past are usually nut cases or political extremists and you can't get the majority to vote much less agree. I wish we had the technology to go colonize a new planet and start fresh, because I don't like the way this one headed. It would take awhile for the new planet to get as bad as this one and hopefully well have learned something before then.

  54. jobs/cows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they take our jobs we'll turn their sacred cows into hamburgers.

    1. Re:jobs/cows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they take our jobs we'll turn their sacred cows into hamburgers.

      No, protect the poor cows. Turn H1B's into hamburger instead.

  55. underperforming workers by slashtom.org · · Score: 1
    If he was "underperforming" then how could he expect his job to be safe?

    If someone spends half their day reading /. instead of working, then a company has good reason not to keep them on. And this guy just sounds pissed off as a hard working indian is now doing his job and probably more.

  56. Re:Slashdot "Capitalists'" Hypocrisy by Hayzeus · · Score: 1
    Well, I'm just guessing, but I've always assumed most (or at least many) /.'rs are either students or unemployed. They may not be pulling down 5 or 6-digit salaries at all.

    By the way, it _is_ possible to get $4.00/hr and pull down 5 digits... Although I don't think at that point it would be termed "pulling down". More like "scraping by". Cheers -- m

  57. Re:Nothing wrong this this by BeerVarmint · · Score: 1

    Of course you are an American, you posted this during the work day... Go fill out a TPS report...

  58. L1 Visa program ,too ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative


    Businessweek says employers have lots of loopholes, not just H1-B

  59. Because remember... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with Sun, the computer *is* the network.

  60. I Feel The Pain... by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1
    My company laid me off last year. And when they felt confident enough to hire somebody for my position again, they got a Russian import from Tel Aviv.

    I am angry that

    1) they got somebody who was obviously less experienced but apparently cheaper (willing to live off beans and rain water) and

    2) was not honest to me about how this layoff pained them so badly to lose someone of my great performance and "customer focus."

    I eagerly await their company's demise.

    --

    They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  61. Different Work Culture by PerlPunk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I expect to be moded down for this, but as a white, male American programmer who has also spent several years in India--seeing what goes on on both sides of the world--my experience with programmers in India is that they are smart, highly educated and a lot more of them than there are of us. In short, American programmers have heavy competition from India. Practically speaking there is some computer training institute on every street corner or in every hole in every Indian city with more than 500,000 people.

    Programmers from India, on the average, do tend to be better educated than American programmers. Not that there aren't highly educated and skilled American programmers, but there are more from India, though.

    If you were an HR person, or an IT manager, and you had to choose between hiring a less-educated American who charges more and a better educated Indian who charges less, you would have to be a socialist (or a nationalist) not to choose the Indian.

    In any case, we should stop whining and meet the competition--whether it is from Russia, Poland, India, etc--by ourselves being more competitive than we are right now.

    1. Re:Different Work Culture by blueZhift · · Score: 1

      There's little question in my mind that there are high quality IT workers outside of the U.S.. The problem for us is that we cannot compete at the wages that foreign IT workers get. For example, a Russian programmer with a PhD in math or physics might be getting $8/hr. How do I know? Lost my programming job to these guys.

      If we want to compete, forget about working for someone else. If we want to stay in IT in this climate , it's time to become entrepreneurs. During the 13 months it took me to get a new full time job, I started my own company so that I could continue to code my own stuff. I haven't made any money on my creations just yet, but I've put the framework in place. And when I do hit it big, it'll be all mine and not some backstabbing corporation's.

    2. Re:Different Work Culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Nonsense. I've worked with plenty of Indian programmers. Some are excellent, some good, but the majority and full of shit and couldn't program their way out of a paper bag.

      And even if they are technically better, usually they have no idea what communication skills are.

    3. Re:Different Work Culture by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. I've worked with plenty of Indian programmers. Some are excellent, some good, but the majority and full of shit and couldn't program their way out of a paper bag.....And even if they are technically better, usually they have no idea what communication skills are.

      Personally, they seem to be a mixed bag, just like citizens. Some good, some idiots. I encountered one who named variables and fucntions like:

      A = B(C,D)

      We joked that he learned on old-style BASIC where variables could only be one letter. It does not matter much if you are a genious if nobody can read your code.

    4. Re:Different Work Culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We joked that he learned on old-style BASIC where variables could only be one letter. It does not matter much if you are a genious

      Hey, fuckwit! There's no 'o' in "genius". Still, I guess you must be a minimum-wage minion, right?

    5. Re:Different Work Culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, fuckwit! There's no 'o' in "genius". Still, I guess you must be a minimum-wage minion, right?

      Sure, careers are allocated purely on spelling skills alone.

  62. Re: fun ride by xpl_the_myst · · Score: 1

    India and America are more than five years apart, I guess. anyway, it's a simple matter of how the US dollar shapes against the India rupee and according to all existing indications, it is only going to rocket. And so, it is *always* going to remain profitable for US companies to outsource ;-)

    Our fun ride continues for ever then .... :-)

    --
    This sig is empty.
  63. I think there maybe a case this time by C_Kode · · Score: 1

    First off, with so many tech workers out of work. It seems fishy to me that they *can't* find someome else to fill the job. Secondly, H1-B's can be hired as long as 1) the position can't be filled (already noted this) 2) No one is laid off to bring an H1-B in. 3) No one is fired just to bring an H1-B in. (can be hard to prove)

    If what was said is true, and with all the uproar lately about H1-B. This may get ugly, and even stick.

    Personally, I've started to have issue with a few things Sun has done. I don't hold any of that against them. I just don't use their products if I have a choice. If *this* is true, I would hold it against them and begin to advocate that others also not use their products.

  64. They'll just waste the money... by Hayzeus · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Low wages are not, those damned Indians will just use it to build more casinos...

    1. Re:They'll just waste the money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your ignorance is showing.

      The casinos are being built by the indigenous people known as Native Americans - mistakenly dubbed "Indians" by Chris Columbus about 5 centuries ago.

      Real "Indians" are from India, a country in Asia, not North America.

    2. Re:They'll just waste the money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhhh.. your lack of a sense of humor is showing. I'm pretty sure he was joking/trolling. Nice indignant response, though!

    3. Re:They'll just waste the money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Laugh. This is actually funny. Seems the moderators don't have a sense of humor today.

      (Hint: The author intentionally confused the term Indian with Native American.)

  65. Just use these eight simple words next time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get me someone who speaks English mother fucker.

    1. Re:Just use these eight simple words next time... by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      ROFL! Ok now who is gonna clean the ice tea offa my keyboard?

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    2. Re:Just use these eight simple words next time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ROFL! Ok now who is gonna clean the ice tea offa my keyboard?


      Luigi'll be happy toa clean the icea tea offa your keyboard, but Luigi can'ta get a visa.

  66. Talk To Your Congressman by g_goblin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think it is time our goverment looked at the H-1B situation again. I think SUN is using the system to it's advantage but should realize there are unemployed techies out there who would take 25 to 50 percent less than what they were making a couple of years ago just to have a job.

    I don't mind H-1B's when unemployment numbers are low and there aren't many qualified candidiates available. But right now I have a lot of buddies chomping at the bit for any kind of gigs like SUN has right now.

    I would be interested to see how many H-1B's are at M$ and IBM since they both have a big presence in India as well.

  67. I do ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the New York Times ...
    The economy has fallen into its worst hiring slump in almost 20 years, and many business executives say they remain unsure when it will end.

    The employment decline has become even worse than it was at a comparable point in the so-called jobless recovery of the early 1990's, according to recently revised statistics from the Labor Department. The economy has lost more than two million jobs, a drop of 1.5 percent, since the most recent recession began in March 2001, as layoffs have continued despite the resumption of economic growth more than a year ago. The decline was 1.3 percent at the same point in the business cycle a decade ago.

    About one million people appear to have dropped out of the labor force since last summer, neither working nor looking for a job, according to government figures.

    The surge in discouraged workers is the most significant since the months immediately after the recession's start. This suggests that the pain of joblessness has worsened even though the official unemployment rate, which counts only people looking for work, held steady at 6 percent in December.

    "Last year," said Tom Koehn, 50, who lost his job at a machinery maker in South Bend, Ind., in May, "I heard a lot of people say, `Come back after the first of the year; if the economy picks up, we might hire some people.' But so far, I haven't found anybody who's hiring."

    The shortage of jobs has also slowed wage growth so that only workers in the most affluent groups are still gaining ground on inflation, ending a six-year streak of broad increases in buying power.

    Manufacturers of durable goods like computers, furniture and steel have made the deepest cuts, with one of every nine jobs in these industries eliminated since early 2001. Airlines, brokerage firms and makers of clothing and textiles have also each cut at least a tenth of their work forces. Government agencies have been among the few employers that continue to expand, although many states are now laying off employees to close budget deficits.

    Executives say they have been disappointed too many times by the halting growth of the last year to begin hiring workers in significant numbers. While the government is likely to report tomorrow that the economy added some jobs in January, many executives are still waiting to be convinced that business has regained a solid footing after the collapse of the bubble of the late 1990's.

    The possibility of a war with Iraq and an increase in oil prices offers another reason for hesitation, they say. Many companies have also used new technologies and management techniques to produce more with the same number of employees.

    "This is what I call the new reality," said Robert M. Dutkowsky, the chief executive of J. D. Edwards, a software maker in Denver that has kept its work force at 5,000 people for the last few years. "The environment we're operating in is what it's going to be like for a while."

    In his State of the Union address last week, President Bush called the improvement of the job market his "first goal" for the coming year and asked Congress to pass a $670 billion, 10-year tax cut.

    "We must have an economy that grows fast enough to employ every man and woman who seeks a job," Mr. Bush said. "With unemployment rising, our nation needs more small businesses to open, more companies to invest and expand, more employers to put up the sign that says, `Help Wanted.' "

    Most economists say that the tax plan and another $4 billion in help for the jobless would have only a small effect on the economy this year.

    The number of companies cutting jobs has spiked since November, with AOL Time Warner, Boeing, Dow Jones, Eastman Kodak, Goodyear, J. C. Penney, McDonald's, Merrill Lynch, Sara Lee, and Verizon all announcing new layoffs. Barring a sustained rise in oil prices, however, the cuts appear likely to taper off in the coming months as the economy continues its slow recovery, most forecasters say.

  68. It has to be said... by ocie · · Score: 3, Funny

    By the many arms of Vishnu, I swear it is a lie.

    --
    JET Program: see Japan, meet intere
  69. This May Be Unfortunate for H-1B Opponents by Baldrson · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Companies that are using H-1B visas are being put out of business more than companies that aren't using H-1B visas and it is becoming apparent that H-1B visas are contributing to their problems rather than resolving them. Suits like this will be used to confuse this issue. H-1B proponents are already claiming, as did the headline of this /. story, that such law suits are "the straw that broke the camel's back". We can ignore the fact that it is obvious to the most casual observer that the use of H-1B visas has, indeed been to lower wages in the US -- in direct violation of the H-1B provision under existing statute.

    It is of most vital importance that it be made clear to Joe-six-pack that heavy users of H-1B visas are going out of business during the economic down-turn faster than their rivals who did not rely so much on H-1B visas -- and that the use of H-1B has not been the solution -- it has rather evolved into the problem.

    H-1B visa opponents are not savvy politically and therefore have to meet extraordinarily impressive standards of evidence that H-1B visas are destructive -- the standard of evidence they must reach to show their case is vastly in excess of the standards that are applied to convince executives to displace their US employees with H-1B visa programs. All the H-1B advocate has to say is "The H-1B programmers don't cost as much." Those H-1B advocates never have to answer for the destruction wraught on the companies by the H-1B visa employees then hired. They're protected by political favoritism toward those that promote "diversity", "anti-racism", "global markets", etc. The corporations destroyed by executives who are so shallow as to presume H-1B visas will raise profits need to have no excuses handed to them at the last minute.

  70. Re:GET THE FUCK OUT YOU FUNNY TALKING FUCKS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As sick and disgusting as your racial slurs are, it should be noted that you should hear them speaking about americans. It's not much better.

    So both peoples should just try and be a little less worked up about it.

  71. Re:Nothing wrong this this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I shouldn't have responded to that A hole. My orginal post was not to piss of working, productive employees.

    Posting on ./ during work does not make us productive - unless you spend more than half of work work time on ./

    Unproductive means an employee takes much longer to do a task because of laziness or unwillingness.

    I mean if it takes someone 1 minute more to do a task that orgianlly required 1 hour - that is not unproductive.

    But if a person takes 2 hours to do something that normally takes and hour - that is unproductive.

    And yes in general Americans are unprodctive. There are studies out there.

    We are the most rich country because we also have the most hard working citizens.

  72. how can you tell the difference... by smitty45 · · Score: 1

    between lawsuits like this that is real and correct, and lawsuits that are the result of whiners who lost their job hoping to make cash ?

    for example, the man bringing the lawsuit, Walter Kruz, has been fired before, and made a stink about it before:

    http://groups.google.com/groups?q=%22walter+kruz %2 2&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=1993Mar18.15305 3.28942%40samba.oit.unc.edu&rnum=2

  73. American Idiots by dnoyeb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why are so many Americans of the impression that America has a greedy Labor force just because somebody in taiwan will work for beans???

    The company is selling the product for the same price, regardless of where the labor is. The only difference here is how much money the American CEOs et al. can squeeze out of their own people. If they can not squeeze enough to buy that extra fleet of jets, fire the Americans and hire elsewhere.

    How does one come to blame the Labor force for this level of greed???

    Why dont we fire the CEOs and hire some from China? We'd save a lot more money...

    I here that people like working for Honda in Ohio assembly plant a lot more than they like working for the Big3...

    1. Re:American Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell yeah. The plant in Anna is a great place to work. And you know at the end of the day you aren't going to get fucked by your company.

      What's interesting with the Japanese companies, barring the wealth of the owners of these companies, is how much smaller the gap between workers' and upper managements' salaries.

  74. WHAT THEY ARE DOING IS WRONG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever wonder why and how Indians get their high-tech training? The companies are supporting their education by supplying equipment, infrastructure and education. Its a clear conspiracy. In the 90's high tech workers were in demand and were paid well due to their scarcity, often more than executives. So the impetus for exploiting the H1-B program is there. They support the training and education of a poor third world country with expensive equipment and create the situation we have now. This is a clear exploitation of a law that is supposed to help companies in need. THAT is illegal. And one reason they have not been stopped is because for some reason the high-tech industry has avoided unionization of the workforce perhaps by the forces of the conditions that same workforce enjoyed just a few years ago. Im no commie, but unions may be something to look at. I prefer dragging these companies out, finding the execs who pull this crap, and prosecuting these scum to the fullest extent.

  75. There is in America by harborpirate · · Score: 2, Informative

    The United States, quite frankly, has a right to protect its own interests (i.e. American workers having jobs) in cases where companies are hiring workers who will work and live in its own borders. All this about it being justified because third world developers will work for less is a bunch of crap, quite frankly.

    Your argument holds if the company is based in some other country, and is told by its government to hire only American workers. Obviously there is no justice there.

    I'll say again, the United States government has a right, perhaps even a mandate, to protect American jobs for Americans. After all, if our government is not out to protect the interests of its people, what good is it? The United States government was _founded_ on the very idea that the reason for its existence is to serve the interests of its people. Clearly allowing jobs generated by American companies, on American soil to be given to foreigners when qualified American workers are available would not be protecting the interests of the American people.

    I also disagree with your assessment "...the quality of american programmers going down...". Though a number of unqualified American programmers exist after the .com bust, those people are gradually returning to other lines of work, and I'd say the quality of the average American programmer is actually going up because of this. I can attest after having had to find a new job a year ago (and a tough time doing so even with a CS degree from an accredited U. and 2 years exp.), there are a large number of very qualified American high tech workers available.

    Overall, I'd say your post is tainted by your own bias. Consider if the same situation were occurring in your own country. Would you want your government to allow jobs in your country to be filled by low paid foreigners, or would you rather your government protected your interests?

    --
    // harborpirate
    // Slashbots off the starboard bow!
    1. Re:There is in America by Chemisor · · Score: 1

      Whom are you "protecting", when you forbid foreigners to work? Sure, you can restrict immigration and your isolationist policy will indeed give more jobs to american citizens. But why would that be a goal? Nobody has a "right" to a job. By forcing employers to hire only citizens, you restrict their candidate pool, and are then interfering with their business. Such interference is quite contrary to the ideas of "free enterprise" upon which the United States was founded. In fact, it gets closer and closer to the old Soviet Union policies, with which I am quite familiar, being a citizen of that derelict country.

    2. Re:There is in America by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1
      Actually, you are wrong. The law does not forbid foreigners to work. It places limitations on foreign workers, just as in every other country.

      The way the system is supposed to work is that a company should try to hire Americans citizens, and current legal immigrants first. If they are unable to find a qualified applicant, they request an H1-B visa. The H1-B visa allows a foreign national into the United States to work for that company, in a specific job, at the prevailing wage for that position.

      Companies are abusing the system using a number of means.

      1. There is what Sun is doing, i.e. laying off older, American workers then asking for H1-B visas.
      2. Companies will ask for a multitude of skills and vast experience for minor positions.
      3. Companies will offer salaries that are far less than the prevailing wage.
      4. Many times, these two are combined, i.e. a company advertises a postion requiring many different skills and/or vast experience and offers a salary that is well below the prevailing wage.
      5. Companies will advertise very specific requirements tailored to a specific worker. This is also against the H1-B process, as the company is not supposed attempt to locate a foreign worker before posting the position.

      What is being alleged is that companies are preferencially hiring foreing workers, which is not allowed under U.S. Labor and Immigration laws. It is not that only citizens are allowed to work, but rather that citizens are being denied jobs in favor of foreign workers. This is fundamentally wrong. The Constitution states that the purpose of the government is to "Promote the General Welfare". Promoting the general welfare of the nation includes protecting the jobs of the citizen of the nation.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    3. Re:There is in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As has been stated before, if the country restricts imports of cheaper foreign products in order to protect American corporations, why should it not have the right to restrict imports of cheaper foreign labor to protect American citizens?

      Which one, corporations or citizens, is the government supposed to represent?

  76. Replace the H1-B program with the B1-B... by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    ..flying over their countries with a full bomb load!

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  77. Buddy, you don't know poor! by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You have NOT lived on what these jobs are paying, let alone less than. I've been so poor that if I didn't wake up with a hard-on, I had nothing to play with all day.

    People do not have a right to two cars, a huge house, overseas vacations, etc. They do however have a right to a government that looks out for the well-being of their own nation, their own people.

    Why the fuck do I pay taxes? It's for services rendered. One of those services is that my government does not sell me and my community out so that one guy can have twenty-two cars, a huge home abroad and a two week vacation here.

    It isn't about making a profit at all costs for these companies. It's about ensuring the well-being of ALL people, both here and elsewhere. If these people were to get paid comparatively, then their standard of living would go up, but instead you insist on bringing MY standard of living down.

    You can fuck right off, and take your fucking multinationals with you.

    --
    You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    1. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Those companies are not the government. If you are valuable to the company, they will let you stay. If a 15 year old Indian kid can do your job better than you can, more power to him. I've worked with many douche bags that were better suited for working at Wendy's than in the IT field. The IT industry owes you nothing if you do nothing for it.

      I hate people that have no ambition then bitch about jobs. If you do not go out and earn some money, you do not deserve to have any money.

    2. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by Xerithane · · Score: 1, Interesting

      People do not have a right to two cars, a huge house, overseas vacations, etc. They do however have a right to a government that looks out for the well-being of their own nation, their own people.


      No, but people have the right to be able to get two cars, a huge house, overaseas vacations. Regardless of where they are from, everybody has the right to work towards that. Every year, an average 3.3 million people are laid off in America. This happened before the .com era, and will continue to happen. You are entitled no job, if someone else can do it cheaper and better than you. If you cry to your government about it, it means that you are a complete fuckwad who has no sense of personal responsibility.

      It isn't about making a profit at all costs for these companies. It's about ensuring the well-being of ALL people, both here and elsewhere. If these people were to get paid comparatively, then their standard of living would go up, but instead you insist on bringing MY standard of living down.

      There is a reason why people get chosen to be laid off. You insist on bringing your standard of living down. You are responsible, and accountable. If these people were paid comparatively, you would still get laid off because they would probably still do it better. Your standard of living is a direct result of your capabilities, in the environment you are in. You are not entitled to a high paying job purely because you have experience in that field; if you suck, oh well, the unemployement line is over there.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    3. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It isn't about making a profit at all costs for these companies. It's about ensuring the well-being of ALL people, both here and elsewhere. If these people were to get paid comparatively, then their standard of living would go up, but instead you insist on bringing MY standard of living down.
      You're entitled to start your own company, whether you want to sell lemonade or kernel-mode software. That's what America gives you, not job security.

      You can be angry or you can be a capitalist. That's what America gives you, not a "Get a Job Free" card.

      Notice that under "American Dream" in the encyclopedia there is no mention of how one is to pursue happiness; that exercise is left to the reader.

      You can fuck right off.

    4. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 1

      The question is no longer who can do it better, it's who can do it cheaper. Tariffs were implemented as a way to prevent the mass exodus of jobs from a country, not a massive tax grab for the government.

      The IT industry doesn't owe me anything. My government owes me lots. They should protect me and my job, and my family. It looks like the only way that this is going to happen is if I go to work at a munitions factory.

      And this is not just protecting me, it's also about protecting my fellow workers from what is essentially predatory pricing. There is no mention of douchebags in my posting. If you're a douchebag, should you have a job? probably not. Are you garunteed one? Not unless you work for a company run by douche bags.

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    5. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by Radical+Rad · · Score: 1

      We _do_ have a government that looks out for its _own_ people. Too bad I'm not one of them. I was born a poor, honest, hardworking American instead.

    6. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by MKalus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      People do not have a right to two cars, a huge house, overseas vacations, etc. They do however have a right to a government that looks out for the well-being of their own nation, their own people.

      True in part, but you can't get that by cutting taxes, somehow the government has to pay for it, so either you have to pay the appropriate taxes for this or you have to look out for yourself. Normally the people screaming about too much regulation are the ones that start screaming for the government when they want something from it. You can't have it both ways.

      Why the fuck do I pay taxes? It's for services rendered. One of those services is that my government does not sell me and my community out so that one guy can have twenty-two cars, a huge home abroad and a two week vacation here.

      True enough, but I am sure you were all in favour of the latest tax cuts?

      It isn't about making a profit at all costs for these companies. It's about ensuring the well-being of ALL people, both here and elsewhere.

      Wrong, that is how companies would like to see themselves portrait but at the end of the day for them (and their shareholders) it is all about profits. Sure they like to say: "Stay out of this government, we can take care of it." But they will only do just enough to look at least halfway good.

      If these people were to get paid comparatively, then their standard of living would go up, but instead you insist on bringing MY standard of living down.

      There has to be a tradeoff: You can't grow indefinetly and as such you have to give up one of your cars in order for someone else to be able to use the resources. You can easily lower your standard of living (well most people can) without really impacting your QUALITY of living.

      You can fuck right off, and take your fucking multinationals with you.

      If you would revert back to a time before the "globalization" and produce everything at home your standard of living would diminish even faster. The costs for the companies would be higher, the companies would look for other ways to cut corners and in the end you wouldn't be better off.

      There have been studies done that show very clearly that the countries (as a whole) who profited most from Globalization are the first world countries.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    7. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 1

      There is a reason why people get chosen to be laid off. You insist on bringing your standard of living down. You are responsible, and accountable. If these people were paid comparatively, you would still get laid off because they would probably still do it better. Your standard of living is a direct result of your capabilities, in the environment you are in. You are not entitled to a high paying job purely because you have experience in that field; if you suck, oh well, the unemployement line is over there.

      But if someone else can do an adequate job for less, and they don't have the same costs placed on me by my country, then damn skippy I'm going to be upset.

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    8. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately we are the sacrificial lambs, aren't we. It's time to make sure that the Government's people are no longer the elite.

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    9. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by ehiris · · Score: 1

      While I agree with you be careful on how you use the multinationals thing because your ancestors were multinational at some point and if they weren't they were probably hunting for buffaloes, sacrificing their children, and communicating through smoke signals.

      And as far as your taxes, there is another issue. Some of the taxes you and H1B workers pay go to the immigration service which is handled by the department of justice which doesn't have much control over labor related issues.

    10. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 1

      Uhm, why do you think that there is a minimum wage? It is a safeguard, not for the rich, but for the poor. Exporting jobs bypasses these checks, and makes the minimum wage a hindrance.
      If you care to post your address, I'll mail you a copy of economics for dummies. You'll enjoy the read, and you may just learn something.

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    11. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by jmccay · · Score: 1

      You're assuming that the layoffs are for good reasons. The last company I worked for laid myself and 3 other people off so that the top 4 people could get their annual bonus of $30,000 each and the promoted CEO could get a $30,000 raise.

      Most layoff from companies these days are based on the greed of the top employees. Before anyone under the level of management gets laid off, management should have take at least two paycuts totaling to abotu 45% of their income.

      If the allegations about the CEO is true, then SUN is descriminating based on race, but that's going to be hard to prove.

      The best thiong everyone here could do is write the congressman and senators and ask them to get rid of the H1-Bs in times of high unemployement in the technology industry. Companies abuse H1-Bs. H1-Bs were supposed to allow companies to get employees when they couldn't find any American employees that were suitable, or could be trined. Companies no longer want to train employees who may be competitant in many other things. H1-Bs should be eliminated all together.

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
    12. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you a communist or just acting like it?

    13. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 1

      There have been studies done that show very clearly that the countries (as a whole) who profited most from Globalization are the first world countries.

      I wholehartedly agree with you, and I am not one to say that I would turn the hands of time back. But unfortunately, the way the economy has grown, it has become a house of cards, stretching to the sky to touch the moon. One wrong move and the whole thing will come falling down. I am merely stating that instead of pulling the cards from the bottom to put another layer on top, why don't we rebuild the bottom layer with a good, solid foundation. Maybe we won't have enough cards to reach the same height, but at lease when one of the cards falls, the whole damned thing doesn't fall down on top of us.

      We can't changed what happened, but we can prevent it from happening again. And giving all the power to the corporations is categorically not the way to do that.

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    14. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by 1lus10n · · Score: 2, Interesting

      dont bother arguing with X, he is a hopeless globablist. and he seems to think americans suck at their jobs. or that for some reason some MCSE bootcamp graduate over in india always does it better.....

      what is rather amusing is that Sun started doing this three years ago -and i do outsourcing work for them - and now they are losing money hand over fist because of bad management and lack of technical skill, management sent the jobs to india and the india techs suck.

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
    15. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 1

      Actually no, I am not a communist, nor am I a capitalist. I would put myself somewhere in-between, although a little farther towards the communist side than not.
      And contrary to popular belief, communist is not a bad word.

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    16. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been so poor that if I didn't wake up with a hard-on, I had nothing to play with all day.

      What about playing with a phone and newspaper?
      You didn't like being poor but not working you liked eh?

    17. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by Slime-dogg · · Score: 1

      The IT industry doesn't owe me anything. My government owes me lots. They should protect me and my job, and my family. It looks like the only way that this is going to happen is if I go to work at a munitions factory.

      Actually, the original structure of our government garauntees that you have the right to say anything. That you have the right to start a business if you want to. That you have a right to earn more money than anyone else. It ensures that you can live your own life without fear of being shot, being used to harbor soldiers, without fear of having your liberties stripped underservingly.

      The government has no responsibility towards keeping you employed. Seriously... If the government dipped their fingers into the economy that far, we would cease to be a capitalist country. It's important that the government does not interfere with our business in that way. They have created responsibilities over time, as seen in the Sherman Act, the New Deal, and the now defunct healthcare reform bill. These "responsibilities" really should be minimized. The anti-trust responsibilities are interesting as it is, it's necessary for some Government intervention in the market in order for the market to remain free. This does not include whether you have a job or not.

      I heard the Army, Navy, and Air Force are hiring. Why don't you go check them out? That way, government actually would be responsibile for your job.

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    18. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by MKalus · · Score: 1

      We can't changed what happened, but we can prevent it from happening again. And giving all the power to the corporations is categorically not the way to do that.

      But that would mean to give up on the "American Dream(TM)" and that would mean that people would need to abadon at least the idea that they can become rich one day themselves.

      In other words: Fat chance. Only after everything collapses will people reconsider.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    19. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by Slashed+Otter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      someone else can do it cheaper and better than you. If you cry to your government about it, it means that you are a complete fuckwad who has no sense of personal responsibility.

      See, here's where I think you're a bit off. The government's job is not just to protect corporations and their profits. That may seem like what they're doing now, but it's not what they're supposed to be doing. A while back (around the time of the Civil War), one of our presidents put it better than I can hope to do here, "...Government of the people, by the people and for the people..."

      So while I fully acknowledge that I have no entitlement to a job and take full responsability for find a job every time I get laid off, it is the government's job to make every effort to keep jobs in this country. It should do this if only to maintain the tax revenue generated by a working public. A skilled worker at Sun making $80k/year will pay about $15k per year in federal taxes and about $5k in state taxes. That same job filled by a skilled Indian worker generates nothing for the government. When you add in unemployment compensation and everything else that goes along with shipping jobs overseas, I think we all have a right to cry foul to our government when we see them making policies that do not discourage companies from laying off American workers.

      Basically, were I to be unemployed (I'm not, lest you think by the argument that I'm making that I am), I would have no right to complain to the government about my personal situation. That is my own responsibility. But I have every right to complain about the broader situation that we as a country are facing. Our government should represent us first, not our employers.

    20. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the tip. And just for the record, I am not an American, and my whole spheel was not US protectionalism.
      I firmly believe that Sun has thus far succeeded despite its management, as do a lot of companies, and many of the reasons for this is protectionalism of corporations. The strong should survive, but that never means tying their hands behind their back so that a smaller competitor gets a shot at the title.

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    21. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by Slime-dogg · · Score: 1

      ...have the same costs placed on me by my country, then d...

      huh? Now I know that you aren't very rational. There's absolutely no reason why you can not go in to your boss, and volutarily match the price of the competing guy. The job is rare, the company is the consumer, and you have to sell yourself. If you don't like that, sorry dude... Just don't bitch about it.

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    22. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhhhh.. nothing like a good American Indian stereotype. Oh... and you forgot the "wigwams".

    23. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      dont bother arguing with X, he is a hopeless globablist. and he seems to think americans suck at their jobs. or that for some reason some MCSE bootcamp graduate over in india always does it better.....


      Did you miss the part where I said that I'm an American? I don't think all Americans suck at their jobs, just a lot of them. And they suck in comparison to what can be accomplished for less money by other people. Not my fault the rest of you are racist.

      what is rather amusing is that Sun started doing this three years ago -and i do outsourcing work for them - and now they are losing money hand over fist because of bad management and lack of technical skill, management sent the jobs to india and the india techs suck.

      News flash for you; Sun started hiring H1-B workers many more years ago than 3. This is about hiring H1-B workers, not outsourcing. Americans are bitching because H1-B workers are coming in and working for less money, without realizing that they can price match and work for a competitive rate. This goes into my loathing for American lack of accountability. Why Americans sue because they're fat and didn't realize McDonalds wasn't helping that. 11% of Americans between 18-24 can't locate America on a map. 87% couldn't find Iraq. You expect me to think the majority of Americans aren't idiots? It's never their fault, it's the man. It's the H1-Bs. It's the overseas workers. Whatever. It's the lack of personal accountability that causes Americans to be where they are at, and I have no sympathy.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    24. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but if I were to go into your boss and say "I know a foreign fellow who will do that for $2 a day and he'll think he's ripping you off", you'd be pretty pissed, and rightly so.
      Now if you were to make certain that sufficient tariffs were placed on his work to make certian that he was competitive, then you have the ability to keep your job on merit.

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    25. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      But if someone else can do an adequate job for less, and they don't have the same costs placed on me by my country, then damn skippy I'm going to be upset.

      Make sure that you don't blame yourself first. Because you know, there is that big gun pointed at your head that is telling you that you can't voluntarily lower your salary to match and stay employed.

      Heaven forbid you actually be accountable for your own life.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    26. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by bluprint · · Score: 1

      Just out of curiosity..how would you propose to do this? Assuming you could influence all votes...

      --
      A modern day witchhunt.
    27. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by bugsmalli · · Score: 1

      Why the fuck do I pay taxes?

      You think H1-B workers don't? This might come as unrelated but the term for H1-B allowed by INS is only 6 years. If you don't get your permanent residency status meanwhile, its bye bye to USA. oh yeah, I will never see the Social Security taxes that I paid, the medicare taxes, the 401K (penalised maybe, if I withdraw early) but the last time someone took my money with no intention of returning it back was called a thief...

      Bottom line is, everyone pays taxes...

    28. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by thegrommit · · Score: 1

      You can fuck right off, and take your fucking multinationals with you.

      What's ironic is the multinationals you're railing against happen to be American owned.

    29. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 1

      Influencing the votes is not the problem. The system is broken. It is run by the affluent for the affluent, with just enough benelovance thrown in to quell revolt. I will be the first to say that I am not the one to bring about this change (plus I'm not eligible to become President, nor do I want the job), but maybe my ramblings will inspire someone who can do it. In all actuallity I am hoping for a black President, someone who isn't from the old boys school, and someone who knows what struggle is. And not the "should I take the BMW or the Mercedes?" type of strggle. But I won't hold my breath...

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    30. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by Xerithane · · Score: 0

      See, here's where I think you're a bit off. The government's job is not just to protect corporations and their profits. That may seem like what they're doing now, but it's not what they're supposed to be doing. A while back (around the time of the Civil War), one of our presidents put it better than I can hope to do here, "...Government of the people, by the people and for the people..."

      It's up to the people to take responsibility for their own lives. For a society that prides itself on free trade and competition, and anti-monopolistic environments, the natives tend to want a monopoly on the jobs and not let the outsiders.

      It should do this if only to maintain the tax revenue generated by a working public. A skilled worker at Sun making $80k/year will pay about $15k per year in federal taxes and about $5k in state taxes. That same job filled by a skilled Indian worker generates nothing for the government. When you add in unemployment compensation and everything else that goes along with shipping jobs overseas, I think we all have a right to cry foul to our government when we see them making policies that do not discourage companies from laying off American workers.

      But corporate taxes ammount to much more than individual taxes. If you take the $30K a year, per employee, that the corporation is saving and it turns into profit or a higher revenue stream than taxes increase. That and there are more sales because they hire on more staff at a lower rate. Corporate taxes increase, individual taxes decrease.

      Basically, were I to be unemployed (I'm not, lest you think by the argument that I'm making that I am),
      Your arguments are much too well thought out for you to be unemployed, or in danger of being that way. Most of the opposing side who are unemployed, or in danger of, respond with knee-jerk, FUD-filled comments.

      I would have no right to complain to the government about my personal situation. That is my own responsibility. But I have every right to complain about the broader situation that we as a country are facing. Our government should represent us first, not our employers.

      My issue is that there has always been millions of lay offs. As society evolves, the layoffs happen in different sectors, and there is still an economical gain. It's important to not lose the focus of the forest, by only looking at a specific type of tree.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    31. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by bugsmalli · · Score: 1

      That would not be based on fact. If you ever look at the labor forms, the company employing the worker has to mention what salary the employee will be paid. If it falls below the line associated with the territory the person is going to be employed at, the visa gets rejected (and the company can get audited. checkmate). I have never heard of an IT firm which states one fact on the form and follows a different plan in person. Liable to get screwed. royally.

    32. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What's really ironic is that even though they're American owned, they are not acting in the best interests of Americans. And even more ironic than that is they are owned by people and they're not acting in the best interest of people. They are acting in the best interest of greed.

    33. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by juan2074 · · Score: 1
      11% of Americans between 18-24 can't locate America on a map. 87% couldn't find Iraq.

      Worse than that, 80% of U.S. military workers deployed to Kuwait in 1991 could not locate where they were on a map.

    34. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I am sure you were all in favour of the latest tax cuts?

      Not me. That cut was a pittance, designed to curry favor with people with no brains. The money has to come from somewhere, and those who prefer the money will stand around in twenty years scratching their asses wondering why social security doesn't allow them to buy anything but cat food to put on the table. If GWBush wants government off our backs, he can jolly well stop taking away civil liberties... but the fact is, he very much wants government all over our backs.

    35. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I am on a H1-B. I get paid $100K a year. I worked my fucking tail off to be where I am today. The reason there are h1-bs are because this is a free-market. The companies ultimate goal is to make money. That is the raison' de etre of all corporations. H1-bs are not cheap labor stealing your job. They are competitors in a free job market. They don't even get unemployment benefits though they pay social security. But their payscales are on par.
      I am from India. And I know what poor is ! so don't give me that shit.

    36. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      I am on a H1-B. I get paid $100K a year. I worked my fucking tail off to be where I am today. The reason there are h1-bs are because this is a free-market. The companies ultimate goal is to make money. That is the raison' de etre of all corporations. H1-bs are not cheap labor stealing your job. They are competitors in a free job market. They don't even get unemployment benefits though they pay social security. But their payscales are on par.
      I am from India. And I know what poor is ! so don't give me that shit.


      Please, everybody read this. It's a shame it came from an AC, but this is the best argument I can see supporting H1-Bs.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    37. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Hahah, you stupid fucking libertarian. You wouldn't last ten minutes if the government actually followed your philosophy. You'd be keeled over dead from diseased pork, right in the middle of your "less government is good government" rally!

      Too bad you can't take a trip in your libertarian time machine and go work in a sweatshop in 19th century New York! Laissez-faire so totally rules.

    38. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by Slashed+Otter · · Score: 1

      But corporate taxes ammount to much more than individual taxes. If you take the $30K a year, per employee, that the corporation is saving and it turns into profit or a higher revenue stream than taxes increase. That and there are more sales because they hire on more staff at a lower rate. Corporate taxes increase, individual taxes decrease.

      Do corporate taxes account for more? While it might not still be the case, I remember seeing an article about how companies like Sun, Cisco and Microsoft used tax loopholes to pay -zero- federal taxes. You're also assuming that there are no additional costs associated with outsourcing jobs. This, especially in technical fields, is definitely not the case.

      I've worked as the American liason to an outsourced development team. We had all sorts of issues like the time difference between the US and India, underqualified developers, limited english skills (part of maintainable code is comments...most of my development time was spent re-writing comments). We probably saved approximately %20 over what we would have spent hiring Americans to do the same job and it was, on the whole, a lot messier process to deal with (more unpredictable...a bad thing in business).

      Think about it...if hiring a coder abroad didn't have all sorts of hidden costs associated with it, why would Sun even deal with hiring H1-Bs that they have to pay %60-%70 of what they'd pay an American if they could get the same thing for $6/hr?

      I have a feeling we feel pretty similar here, there's just a few sticking points. We both see that a lot of the anti-foreigner rhetoric is being spouted by people who are unemployed and scared about what the future might hold for them. But I think my point boils down to the fact that it is better for the country as a whole for the government to make every effort to keep jobs in this country. The alternative is only better for the small percentage of the country that are company executives. Those complaining about the government's handling of these issues (for whatever reason), have some point if the government is thinking more about those few CEOs, CIOs, CFOs and VPs and less about the rest of us.

    39. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This goes into my loathing for American lack of accountability. Why Americans sue because they're fat and didn't realize McDonalds wasn't helping that. 11% of Americans between 18-24 can't locate America on a map. 87% couldn't find Iraq. You expect me to think the majority of Americans aren't idiots? It's never their fault, it's the man.

      You know, it's sad but I totally agree with you. I am by no means God's gift to the planet when it comes to brainpower and knowledge but I am appalled and disgusted when the various shows do their "man on the street" interviews and people show how fucking moronic we as a nation are.

      I remember one where people were asked to name the states that bordered on the state of "New England." Only 1 person out of 30 or so knew it was actually a region - the rest were merrily guessing away.

      It's no wonder companies are looking to find a talent pool with less chlorine in it.

    40. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by tumbaumba · · Score: 1

      "...Government of the people, by the people and for the people..."

      You see, that is a problem. Government is not what someone wrote in a book or someone wants it to be no matter how benevolent that person is. Government is a bunch of people most of whom are not even elected (see Department of State in US) who are driven by all sorts of motives and let me assure you that "for the people, etc. etc." is not first on their list if on a to-do list at all. As someone put it in a movie I saw awhile ago: "We all fighting here for our place under Sun" (irony for Sun Microsystems). Someone wants to have a food on a table and someone wants ten cars and a palace on Bahamas or be a president of USofA and rule the world. We can hope on a good will of our government(s) or try to influence them through elections or whatever, but we should not count on them been any helpful because they (i.e. people who constitute government) really do not care about any one of us, be you an American or foreigner or from Mars. When government does something good to you consider it to be a gift.

      Cheers.

    41. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      Do corporate taxes account for more? While it might not still be the case, I remember seeing an article about how companies like Sun, Cisco and Microsoft used tax loopholes to pay -zero- federal taxes. You're also assuming that there are no additional costs associated with outsourcing jobs. This, especially in technical fields, is definitely not the case.

      That is largely FUD, and wrong. They do pay a significant amount in taxes. There are additional costs with outsourcing. Such as buying the computers (which will most likely come from US vendors), software (which will most likely come from US Vendors), equipment (which will most likely come from US Vendors).

      I've worked as the American liason to an outsourced development team. We had all sorts of issues like the time difference between the US and India, underqualified developers, limited english skills (part of maintainable code is comments...most of my development time was spent re-writing comments). We probably saved approximately %20 over what we would have spent hiring Americans to do the same job and it was, on the whole, a lot messier process to deal with (more unpredictable...a bad thing in business).

      I do this all the time, and just finished acting as a security sounding board for a pretty large project that is being outsourced to an Indian firm. They do save money, quite a bit of it. It all depends upon who you hire, and how much you pay. There are some amazingly good firms based out of India. There are also some shitty ones. I've worked in a place where their was an entire perl script consisting of about 2K lines that had 4 comments in it, "This part is documented in the horse book on page XXX." American coder, guy was a joke. I've met tons of idiotic programmers, and most of them haven't been Indian (I can only think of 2, actually.)

      Think about it...if hiring a coder abroad didn't have all sorts of hidden costs associated with it, why would Sun even deal with hiring H1-Bs that they have to pay %60-%70 of what they'd pay an American if they could get the same thing for $6/hr?
      I'm confused where this turned into competition of H1-Bs and Outsourcing. Some projects, such as isolated projects, are fine for outsourcing. Things like kernel additions, or things that require working with a team of experienced people should be kept local.

      Choose the best tool for a job, whether it's outsourcing or local employees. If the best tool for a job happens to ask for $80K and the second best tool happens to ask for $50K and there isn't much difference in their skills, pick the $50Ker and give yourself a nice bonus :)

      I have a feeling we feel pretty similar here, there's just a few sticking points. We both see that a lot of the anti-foreigner rhetoric is being spouted by people who are unemployed and scared about what the future might hold for them. But I think my point boils down to the fact that it is better for the country as a whole for the government to make every effort to keep jobs in this country.

      I really hate the anti-foreigner speech that goes on. If anybody is scared what the future holds for them, I would suggest that person stop being a whiney bitch and start improving themselves. There is that Sean Connery line, "Losers always whine about their best, while winners go home and fuck the prom queen."

      Sean Connery can answer all of lifes greatest questions.

      As for the government protecting US jobs, I believe in part you are correct. H1-Bs do get abused all the time, and that is messed up. Suing a company for using the best tool for the job is just dumb. Bitching about a company using the best tool for the job is just dumb. Bitching at the government for issuing too many H1-Bs is not dumb. Saying that foreigners are destroying the economy is dumb, and all those people need to remember that at one time, they were foreigners too. I'm a pretty recent addition to America, and still have a lot of memories of hearing stories a

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    42. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by Glog · · Score: 1

      Get your facts straight - H1-B workers work in THIS country and PAY TAXES JUST LIKE YOU DO. And yes there is a lower limit on how much they can be paid - it's called the prevailing wage. And yes companies are supposed to make sure that an American citizen cannot fill the position.

    43. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, this is called structural unemployment. When someone else can do the same job for less money, they have the comparative advantage and business forces push towards that person having the job. In a global economy, if there is one market where you can buy something for 1000 dollars and another where the price is 100000, then it's only logical that people will buy from the less expensive market and sell to the more expensive market until such a time as the prices in both markets are equalized. Basically, what this means for you is that your standard of living is going to go down as someone else's standard of living where the market is less expensive goes up. This IS NOT A BAD THING! While, your standard of living goes down, the overall standard of living of everyone goes up and, as such, so does the overall production capabilities of the world. You americans (and people in the other first world countries (hey, I'm one of them, so my standard of living will go down as well)) will just have to suck it up while things are equalizing because in the long run it's better for us all.

    44. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the government wants money from taxes then it had better keep you employed..

    45. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by MKalus · · Score: 1

      I agree with your statement. The reason I brought this up though was that most people in America are still better off (and profited more from Globalization) than the programmer in India or the H1B guy who came into the country.

      Leaving everything you know behind and start over is a HUGE undertaking, something that a lot of people never get.

      Will Globalization work in the long run? Yes, IF done right.

      IS Globalization done right? Not by far.

      Will be all be happy with what we get? Most likely not.

      But again, no changes will be made until the whole house of cards collapses.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    46. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by 1lus10n · · Score: 1

      holy crap i actually AGREE with you about something.

      most americans are stoopid fat and lazy.

      actually Sun didnt start hiring h1-b workers en mass until about 3 years ago. (in the tech area, not sure about sales) which was about the time they raised the h1-b visa count to help ease the need for warm bodies in the tech industry.

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
    47. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by 1lus10n · · Score: 1

      yeah i agree with the part about Sun succeeding despite management.

      the sad part is that Sun is going to end up like DEC. really good with tech stuff, really revolutionary, really bad with bussiness stuff .... which will lead to its being bought or going out of bussiness

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
    48. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      actually Sun didnt start hiring h1-b workers en mass until about 3 years ago. (in the tech area, not sure about sales) which was about the time they raised the h1-b visa count to help ease the need for warm bodies in the tech industry.

      I suppose you have to define en mass. I know that in 1998 they were hiring a lot of H1-Bs in their Palo Alto campus. There was not the huge push for H1-Bs until 1999 though, because the companies overquoted the job demands so INS would allow more H1-B visas to be issued.

      The INS is so fucked up anyway, they are on par with the USPTO.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    49. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by ninewands · · Score: 1
      Quoth the poster:
      The government has no responsibility towards keeping you employed.

      Spoken like an Ayn Rand "true believer." But before you go too far down that path, consider the rest of this post.
      Seriously... If the government dipped their fingers into the economy that far, we would cease to be a capitalist country.

      The problem is that the government already HAS dipped it's fingers that far into the economy. Back during the dot-bomb bubble, the tech industry convinced Congress to TRIPLE (from 65,000 -> 195,000) the number of H-1B visas available because "there's a CRITICAL shortage of tech workers!!!" In truth, by the time the legislation was passed and signed into law, the bubble was already shrinking.
      It's important that the government does not interfere with our business in that way.

      It's also important, for the continued employment of the Congresscritters, that they not ACTIVELY participate in increasing unemployment in this country by kow-towing to corporate interests. People vote, corps can't.

      This is not intended to be a racist or nationalist diatribe, but the American worker made the American economy the largest on earth. If Sun wants to employ Indian coders, more power to them. Let them move the corporate headquarters and their manufacturing operations to India too. Of course, they'll also have to live with the Indian system of corporate taxes and many other factors that increase the cost of operating a business overseas. Not to mention what moving overseas would do to their stock price and their access to US financial markets.

      If they want to reap the benefits of being a US company, then they should hire local labor FIRST.
    50. Re:Buddy, you don't know poor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      A skilled worker at Sun making $80k/year will pay about $15k per year in federal taxes and about $5k in state taxes. That same job filled by a skilled Indian worker generates nothing for the government.
      You just made that up, didn't you? That same job filled by a skilled Indian worker generates exactly the same $15k per year in federal taxes and about $5k in state taxes.
  78. What by MC68040 · · Score: 1

    "What" was the reaction when I read this.
    - There is nothing that says you can't fire someone to replace them with someone that will do the same job for a lower pay, especially if the current employee refuses to lower his pay to the other emplyee's level.
    And the fact that the new engineers are from india doesn't matter at all, if they went to IIT, they have better grades than most MIT engineers anyway.

    1. Re:What by mjpaci · · Score: 1

      ummm...

      Yes there is. You cannot hire an H1B holder if it displaces a US Citizen or US Resident Alien. Also, you cannot categorically pay H1B employees less than US workers.

      Yes, most of them are from IIT, but it doesn't matter what their grades are. Would you hire a B+ Engineering Student from UMASS over the B student from MIT or CalTech based on grades?

      --Mike

    2. Re:What by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, but people from IIT are as skilled as people from MIT or Caltech? How do I know this? Just see where the Indian profs in MIT and Caltech came from in India. And the answer will most likely be 'IIT'. If folks from IIT are good enough to *teach* folks in MIT, why would you compare IIT to UMASS

  79. Its the Engineers Own Fault by a7244270 · · Score: 1

    I'm not against foreigners - actually in this case, I am more pissed off at the Americans. Really, this is not much different from the assraping that medical doctors have to take on a daily basis.

    If you don't like it FORM A UNION and fight for your rights.

    Theres a reason wrench monkeys at the auto makers make ridiculous money and have pretty much eternal job security, and UPS drivers start off at 1.5x the salary of a newly graduated engineer.

    Why ? They realized that there is power in numbers, and they stuck together to make sure that the company they work for doesn't take advantage of them.

    That take real, honest to goodness balls, which far too many debt laden, middle-class, complacent engineers just don't have.

    For some reason the higher income people in the US seem to feel that they are above unions, but you can bet your ass that if all the tens of thousands of engineers that Sun has went on strike for just one day, they would sit up and listen pretty damm fast.

    1. Re:Its the Engineers Own Fault by DirkDaring · · Score: 1

      A few thoughts on your reasoning:

      #1. You can't outsource fixing a car to another country.

      #2. You can't outsource delivering UPS packages to another country.

      #3. You can outsource tens of thousands of engineers to another country.

      #4. Profit!

    2. Re:Its the Engineers Own Fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then, why haven't the garages around the US brought the foreigners here just like the tech companies have?

      Why haven't UPS, FedEx, etc. brought in foreigners?

      They would have had it not been for unions.

    3. Re:Its the Engineers Own Fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For some reason the higher income people in the US seem to feel that they are above unions, but you can bet your ass that if all the tens of thousands of engineers....

      Amen!

      Our "prefessional" arrogance is biting us in the ass now.

    4. Re:Its the Engineers Own Fault by a7244270 · · Score: 1

      A few thoughts on your reasoning:

      #1. You can't outsource fixing a car to another country.


      I was talking about car making, not car fixing

      #2. You can't outsource delivering UPS packages to another country.

      True, but the article was talking about H1-B engineers being imported to fill domestic jobs, not work being exported. You don't hear about H1-B workers coming into UPS in quantity because the unions won't stand for it.

      #3. You can outsource tens of thousands of engineers to another country.

      Perfectly true. This is the same thing that happened in the automobile industry - USA cars were crap quality and expensive. Then cars started coming in from Japan, Korea, Germany, etc., and the US auto industry had to improve their product or die.

      But if you make a better and higher quality product, then you can charge more, which will let you swallow higher labour costs.

      Perfect example is the German auto industry. Labour costs in Germany are higher than Japan or USA, but guess what - they make a better product, which allows them to remain competitive. VW makes their low end models in Mexico, but the high end models (which can carry more markup, and require higher build quality) and engines are still made in Germany.

      #4. Profit!

      Can't argue against profit :)

  80. Anyone else... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read this: "A lawsuit filed yesterday in California alleges computer giant Sun Microsystems Inc. laid off thousands of American high-tech workers in order to replace them with younger, lower-paid engineers from India"

    as: "..., lover-paid engineers from India"?

  81. Good evening ladies and germs... by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    ..uh oh... better buy that plane ticket! But to where? I was born in New York!

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  82. tradition by spoonyfork · · Score: 1

    My ancestors came to the US from Europe as indentured servants a 150 years ago. How is are companies bringing over H1Bs any different?

    --
    Speak truth to power.
  83. Re:Nothing wrong this this by BeerVarmint · · Score: 1
    I know, and I agree with you. For example, I run a medical database shop. We spend 1 hour a day playing unreal tournament. Know why? We get more code done in the other 7 hours. Plus, we are still available to answer calls while 'on break'

    Mmmmm. Networked nuclear weapons.

  84. Be careful of ripple effects... by PatSand · · Score: 5, Informative
    Interesting consequences either way:

    1. Sun loses suit...

    US companies have to hire us folks; competitive pressures force innovation to stay competitive or they die/merge/go bankrupt...

    2. Sun wins suit/has it dismissed...

    As more jobs move overseas, domestic markets dry up (who is working? who can buy?). Watching the US market die is not good for a company...will lead to global unemployment...

    I have no qualms with new jobs being created overseas (hey, that's capitalism at it's best), but reducing headcount (and hence customers) in your biggest market is not too swift...

    My vote: first option for existing jobs and get innovative. The US didn't get this dominant (economically) simply by copying what others do...we figured out how to do it better and new ways to do it (quick nod to Britain and the EC members for various technologies-like radar and jet engines-that we licensed and enhanced)...

    And if a company can't innovate, should they be left to die? Maybe...

    But one thing that must happen is that company need to focus more on their long-term survival instead of always pushing to improve short-term profits. This is a major driving force behind this exodus, and it will continue to kill many companies until this unhealthy view stops. Profit is essential for a company, but not at the expense of it's future.

    How to change focus, you might ask? More R&D but also have management really monitor it; and have marketing do real market analysis, not sales and sales support.

    Look back in the pre-80's business and economics textbooks...they had it right and it still is right...

    --
    Supreme Granter of Doctor of Obviology Letters ("A FIRM Command of the Obvious")
    1. Re:Be careful of ripple effects... by DirkDaring · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "But one thing that must happen is that company need to focus more on their long-term survival instead of always pushing to improve short-term profits."

      90% of the time, this will never happen.

      Execs are looking for the golden egg. Make it, get it, get out, live on the beach earning 20%.

      Dirk

  85. Heck, I'm terrified. Am I the only one? by LiberalApplication · · Score: 1
    I'll preface this by saying that I am by no means a historian, or an economist, or a very bright individual for that matter, but lately I've been getting the feeling that tech-industry fellers like ourselves are the auto workers and factory laborers of this generation.

    Work is being continually outsourced to cheaper markets, leaving those semi-skilled laborers in more developed nations jobless. Remember when there was a push to have autos, blue-jeans, and knick-knacks of all sorts manufactured in the states (I apologize for the Americentricism here)?

    Unfortunately, with engineering, there isn't an obvious physical commodity produced upon which we can slap a "Made in the USA" sticker. Stick that in your code comments and noone will ever see it.

    Friends of mine who are in large consulting firms such as KPMG tell me stories about US consulting companies going into an engagement, determining what sorts of technologies should be used, and then outsourcing all of the work to India. This doesn't offend me, but it sure scares me something fierce. That work that's moving out-of-country? That's what I do for a living too!

    What are our options?

    Move into management?

    Get a job at an auto factory?

    Become a world famous, tightrope-walking, flaming-chicken-juggling, one-man-band?

    I'm all for spreading the wealth around the planet, but I'm just afraid that our work-well might dry up as a result of this. What to do? What to do?

    What are your fears and plans, /.-ers?

  86. Well... by autopr0n · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This seems to be more about blatant racism then immigration issues. I mean, the cofounder is Indian and said that sun favors Indians. That's totally illegal under US law. On the other hand, it does make some sense 'protect' H1-B visa holders from being fired, since they would then need to find another job or leave the country, while americans can just go on unemployment for a while.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A non white male racist? Never!!!!!

    2. Re:Well... by janda · · Score: 1

      Sayith the original poster:

      On the other hand, it does make some sense 'protect' H1-B visa holders from being fired, since they would then need to find another job or leave the country, [...]

      Discrimination is illegal, even when done for "good" reasons.

      --
      Karma: Food Fight (Mostly affected by Date Plate).
  87. This is capitalism by apankrat · · Score: 1

    If you run a company and have a choice between hiring two PhDs for the price of one BSc and select latter, you failed as a manager. As simple as that.

    --
    3.243F6A8885A308D313
  88. Personal viewpoint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a native-born US citizen, my job in the US should be protected at all costs from competing foreigners. Why? Well, 35 years ago my country came to me and told me I had to put my education and career on hold so I could go fight a war in some far away country. I dutifully went, and did my country proud. So today, on the eve of my retirement, I am working in an office with our company's first H1-B. Management hasn't even tried to hide the fact that this guy is going to be taking over all my duties, and I expect I'll be out on the street looking for work inside of a year, almost age 60, with no retirement benefits to tide me over. I'll get a few crisp 20's each month in Social Security, and that's about it. So I ask you, is this is the reward I get for being a patriotic American? Maybe the next time they call a war, nobody will go.....

  89. Not just H1B ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I worked at Sun a few years back ... and one of the factors that led to me quitting was when my (Indian) Director kept promoting Indian co-workers over more-deserving non-Indians. (Another was being fed up with an organization that was so focussed on empire building rather than delivering what customers kept asking for. But that, and other such reasons, would be offtopic.)

    It was clear bias ... these were people that didn't have a track record of producing results. They did have a clear record of obstructing other workers who did produce the results consistently, on-time, under-budget, and high quality (low bug-count etc); results that successfully got the company into some rather big markets. These were significant promotions (E-12 for those of you who know what that means), given to folk with track records of not being innovative, delivering late, and having big overruns and buggy results. (Quick quiz: Which approach is better for the bottom line? Which is better for empire building?) The managers in the groups hushed some of the promotions up for months, since they were so obviously unfair to other people who were clearly more deserving. (But who didn't happen to be Indian, like that Director.)

    And yes, I know exactly how the "Indian Contractors" end up being so popular. Part of it is that they can be hired/fired on short notice; another is that they're relatively cheap. And then, big surprise, they have a leg up on becoming full-time ... as opposed to someone who didn't need a visa, but wasn't already "part of the team". Then lo and behold, when it comes time to cut costs, do you think the lower-paid workers are at the top of the layoff list? Even if the law about their visa status says they should be???

    To be clear: I've had plenty of Indian co-workers I'd work with again. Some of them were a pleasure to work with. But never would I work with that director who had such blatant biases in promotion policy; and never with the people that got such undeserved promotions.

    With the Human Resources department backing such actions in at least one part of the company, I can't possibly believe that one of these lawsuits shouldn't eventually succeed.

  90. Re:Nothing wrong this this by rdean400 · · Score: 1

    Go read some studies yourself. What you say is true, but it's not true anymore:

    http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2002/06/art4full.pdf

  91. This doesn't even take outsourcing into account by Ececheira · · Score: 1

    Many companies will contract the labor out to an Indian company to get around the equal pay problem of H1-B's. Rather than have foreigners work over here, they work for an Indian company, in India, and take two-month business trips here to train.

    A lot of work is being shifted offshore like this, and it's purely for economic reasons. An Indian engineer makes a small fraction of what an American one does, so the Indian company can underbid any US outsourcing firm.

  92. From the CSM ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Paul Porter is closing the door on his engineering career - even though he's only 29. In recent weeks, his wife and five close colleagues were added to the more than 50,000 employees axed by his employer, Nortel Networks. That was the catalyst that prompted the New York native, already disgruntled with his choice of profession, to look into attending either business or law school.

    "I spent seven years in school, and it resulted in a six-year career," says Mr. Porter, who feels his master's degree in engineering is little more than "a base."

    E-mail this story

    Write a letter to the Editor

    Printer-friendly version

    Permission to reprint/republish

    monitortalk:

    Weigh in on issues of the day in our MonitorTalk forums.

    Click here...

    It's a pattern that's recurring with surprising, and disturbing, frequency in a profession long known for job security.

    Dissatisfaction with the field is growing rapidly. Layoffs, the influx of foreign workers, and offshore outsourcing of jobs have caused the pocket-protector set to either leave the profession in large numbers or seek new careers after being laid off.

    And if that isn't enough to make engineers' neckties curl in Dilbert-style desperation, there's the nature of the work itself. In an era when high-tech gear becomes obsolete almost as fast as dairy products, many in the field feel they must advance at a steady pace or risk being cast aside.

    It's a far cry from the era when engineering skills were a ticket to a lifelong salary and, some say, raises questions about America's ability to remain at the forefront of technology.

    "For people who view this as a career, engineering is in worse shape now than it's been in years," says LeEarl Bryant, president of the Institute of Electronic and Electronic Engineers (IEEE-USA), which represents 235,000 professional members.

    The downturn in the profession has taken many by surprise. In the '80s many felt there was an engineering shortage in the US to compete with Japan's dominance of technology markets. Then, the commercialization of the Internet created a hiring frenzy in which high-tech corporations gave huge bonuses to new hires and the employees who referred them. The IEEE-USA reports that such bonuses pushed the median salary for its members to $93,100 at the peak of the dotcom era.

    Tough times; huge layoffs

    But all that changed with the dotcom bust and the recession. This year, for example, telecommunications and computer makers have already slashed nearly 400,000 workers - and that's down from last year's 500,000 layoffs - according to outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas.

    Even Dilbert creator Scott Adams, himself a former engineer, has an eye on the trend. "The general balance of power has swung. Engineers had it for a while, now the bosses have it back," says Mr. Adams, whose comic-strip boss has hair shaped like a pair of horns on either side of his balding head.

    Adding to the frustration of some engineers are the numbers of foreigners competing for jobs. In 2000, near the end of the high-tech boom, industry CEOs convinced Congress to nearly double the number of H-1B visas, allowing up to 195,000 skilled workers from India and elsewhere into the US. Some engineers contend that those CEOs kept many of those H-1B workers while cutting higher-paid US citizens.

    "About 80,0000 engineers were unemployed a few months ago. If you take out the H-1Bs who came in, you'd have jobs for all of them," the IEEE-USA's Bryant says. The organization is lobbying Congress to lower the number of H-1B issued.

    But US companies may continue to rely on foreign workers as the number of people entering the profession shows signs of decline. Demand for engineering courses is down in the US, according to the National Science Foundation statistics. In 2000, there were just over 59,000 engineering graduates compared to 63,000 students in 1996.

    Not everyone is gloomy a

  93. Microsoft is by micaiah · · Score: 1

    "everyone likes to put down microsoft, but this isn't something you see them doing. and somehow they still manage to compete." Microsoft is jumping on the India bandwagon like everyone else. They have a development center there. The development of JUMP isn't taking place in the U.S. Bill is very concerned about programmers learning other products than MS stuff. In addition to exporting work to India he has been going over there and donating large sums of money, etc.

  94. New Law: No US Employees, No US Profit by cosmosis · · Score: 1

    I think congress should seriously consider some news laws. If countries want to outsource all of their work to overseas offices. Fine. However by the same token, they should not be allowed to sell back over here, unless they pay a huge tariff, just like any other OVERSEAS company!

    Sounds fair to me.

    The real sad irony of all of this, as more and more companies resort to cheaper labor overseas, especially highly technical labor, then that means there will be that many previously affluent employees who will not be purchasing and driving the economy. Its a vicious spiral... downwards. Pretty soon, all of these companies, the economy itself will tank, becuase it consists of consumers who can't afford to buy anythign becuase:

    1) They were laid off by companies finding cheaper labor overseas.

    2) They are those people working overseas only making $.85/hour.

    Its one big fucking joke, if the end result wasn't so damn serious - A global Deflationary Depression.

    Planet P Blog

    1. Re:New Law: No US Employees, No US Profit by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      >Pretty soon, ... , the economy itself will tank,

      You been keeping up on current events, pal?

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    2. Re:New Law: No US Employees, No US Profit by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > Its one big fucking joke, if the end result wasn't so damn serious - A global Deflationary Depression.

      Then stay out of debt - don't buy a $500K house because it'll be worth $50K two years from now. Instead, put up with a crappy apartment and save $10K a year, so that you can buy a house for pocket change two years down the road from somebody who did go into debt to buy it today.

      (If you think inflation is the problem - do the opposite - leverage yourself to buy a $500K house now, and mortgage it to the hilt, because in two years, your house will be worth $5M, you'll be making $1M/year, and groceries will cost $20/pound, against which your $500K mortgage is peanuts.)

      Disclaimer: I don't believe either of these scenarios is likely. I believe we'll continue to have low to moderate inflation, because the Fed will print any amount of money it has to in order to stave off the deflationary spiral the original poster fears. The Fed will also clamp down hard to prevent hyperinflation, as the "go ahead, rack up the $500K mortgage because it'll be peanuts to pay back" scenario doesn't work too well for the banks either :)

      The moral of the story is that for any economic forecast, there are ways to hedge yourself.

      Just as most of us regularly monitor and anticipate developments in technology in order to keep our career plans current, we owe it to ourselves to do the same as regards economic and sociopolitical developments.

      (And if you really think Sun's outsourcing to India is gonna boost profit margins to the stratosphere, why not share in the gains by becoming an owner of Sun, through the purchase of SUNW stock?)

      Disclosure: I have no position in SUNW.

  95. Quality of work by the_rev_matt · · Score: 1

    I've worked as a contractor at many companies in the past five years, and some of them used H1-B's while others just outsourced work to "subsidiaries" in India. The H1-B's were largely pretty decent (this was during the dotcom boom when companies were really struggling to fill cubes) though generally not as adept at the business analysis side of development. The code we got back from outsourcing would've embarrassed the students at the local community college's "intro to programming" class. It was invariably horribly convoluted and bug ridden. On the off chance it would actually run without a major rewrite, it was usually wildly unstable. You get what you pay for.

    --
    this is getting old and so are you

    blog

  96. With gas at $2.26/gal and rising... by StupidKatz · · Score: 1

    ... there might well be a bright future for gas station attendants.

    1. Re:With gas at $2.26/gal and rising... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be for the gas-station owners... not the attendants.

  97. Foreign doctors on the rise by swb · · Score: 1

    Twice in the past year I've had minor medical issues that just didn't warrant the hell that is trying to get into my regular doctor on short notice, so I went to the "urgent care" center.

    Each time I was worked on by a doctor who was obviously not an American. The first guy was Egyptian and the second woman was Bulgarian. I can't say that the care was substandard (a bottle of amoxicillin each time), but their English was *awful* and their bedside manner was almost rude. And not that it matters, but their personal appearance was pretty shoddy -- bad, slept-in-my-car-in-my-clothes appearance.

    I found out from a friend who is a doctor that this particular chain of urgent care centers specializes in bringing in foreign MDs and certifying them as US doctors. I dunno if there's some gimmick or not (ie, a fully certified doctor "on call" or what), but I'm sure the overall trick is that they will work for $30k a year, shitty hours in order to become American citizens and doctors.

    Anyway, the AMA is losing this battle or at least winning a pyhrric victory.

  98. Free market will increase price of outsourcing by srowen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Think about it in the longer term... if outsourcing to India is effective, there will be more demand for it, and the price of tech labor in India will naturally increase.

    There will always be a demand for workers in the U.S. itself; companies always need wokers locally, and will be willing to pay more for them because of the convenience.

  99. thats progress eh? by collapser · · Score: 1

    even the "knowledge" part of "knowledge based economy" seems to be leaving the west..

    --
    <B>note to self:</B> <I>post as html</I>
  100. Take a stand by erroneus · · Score: 1

    Okay, I'm a Texas-born white guy, middle-aged and essentially "under-employed" as I can't get a job as a network administrator these days. The industry has changed and IT employment is insanely high.

    Economic times are hard for more than just the IT sector. The government has a responsibility to its people. U.S. companies have a responsibility to the U.S. and its people.

    We can talk about law and legalities all day long but none of it takes away from the moralities that are being seriously violated. As U.S. companies sells out the interests of its own people and ultimately its own country, there is clear indication that short-sighted gains at the expense of something larger is a large-scale problem in the U.S. There should be some very stiff penalties when companies commit fraud against the U.S. Specifically, I speak of clear violations of law surrounding the H1-B visa program which should include permanant disqualification of its use. Perhaps that would be a fair deterrent of the program's abuse.

    Abuse occurs and should be punished.

  101. IT on the move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Did this guy get a raw deal? Who knows.

    I've been writing software for nearly a decade, and I've seen this transition happening more and more.

    The reality is that what has happend in manufacturing is now happening with IT type posistions. Now that other places in the world (noteably India, but China, Malasia, and Phillipeans are up and coming..) have the knowledge, training and infrustructure to support the types of development predominantly done in the US, these jobs will be transistioning to the lowest bidder, both in the US and outside it. The fact that major businesses could lead congress to believe that there was a huge demand for tech help is a no brainer (here congress puppy ... catch the $$$) - I used to be able to pretty much name and get my salary. Since the .com meltdown, the extra H-1B visas are no longer 'required', but they lower salaries in the US to more business tolerable levels. It also takes a -long- time to change anything via congress

    1) Business costs go down, making the products more competitive world-wide.

    2) Will some in the US get a raw deal? You bet, but try and prove it. The definition of 'underperforming' is different for everybody.

    3) Don't forget the realities of the global market. Companies must continually grow in order for the stock price to go up. That means they must find new markets to sell their products in. What better way to do it than hire some cheap foreign labor here (H-1B), filter down to the prime candidates, then customize their products for the home markets of those foreigners. Global companies need insiders to make that transition.

    4) It costs many times more to live in metro-US than in various parts of India/Brazil/etc, so US citizens will require higher wages, regardless of how frugally they live.

    5) Don't give me that 'workers from place A are simply better than from place B' nonsense. I've seen all shades of grey from everywhere.

    6) Will everyone lose out to lower cost markets? Nope. There is something to be said for quality local talent in each market the business operates in.

    6) If you are a US IT worker, either make sure you are personally valuable to your company, or prepare to be replaced - same as every other market.

  102. H1-B isnt such a great deal for the Indians either by mcmonkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Howdy,

    Most of the comments so far are from the point of view of the displaced worker, but the H1-B program has a lot of pit falls for the foreign nationals who come to the USA.

    First, H1-B is a temporary visa. People come here, settle down, buy a home, start a family, become part of the community. But unless they take steps to achieve a more permanent status, such as citizenship or having a green card, they can be kicked out of the country at a moments notice. And with the current political climate, I wouldn't recommend overstaying your visa in the USA right now.

    Second, H1-B is sponsored by a company. The worker only has the legal right to work for that company. Don't like your working conditions? Don't think you're getting a fair wage? Fine, then leave your home, family, and friends and leave the country. H1-Bs can't quit a job and look for other work. It's hard not to get settled in and used to a place after a couple years, so there are plenty of stories of people who thought of themselves as permanent residents getting shipped off.

    Third, part of the requirements for H1-B is workers get paid prevailing wages. One of the ways companies get around that is bringing in people with little experience. "Sure, the H1-B doesn't get paid as much as the citizen engineer. But one has 1 year experience and the other has 10, so you can't make a direct comparison." But what happens as the years go by as the worker with the visa gets more experienced and worth more in the marketplace? As the disparity between the prevailing rate and the H1-B's salary grows, the company as two choices. They can give the guy a raise. Although if they wanted to do that, they could of kept the original citizen worker that got laid off.

    The other option is to ship the guy or gal back to India and replace with a fresh new import. I'm not knocking India, but remember, this worker has spent years in the USA. May be married. May have kids who are citizens. But if that worker is H1-B, and the sponsoring company says buh-bye, then worker is taking a little one-way trip.

    Abuses of the H1-B program hurt the native workers here in the USA AND the foreign nationals who come here.

  103. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Could this be the straw that breaks the proverbial camel's back?"

    What does this have to do with perl?

  104. It's time to... by devnull17 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...suspend the program temporarily, IMHO. There are plenty of unemployed programmers and engineers in this country.

    1. Re:It's time to... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      ...suspend the program temporarily, IMHO. There are plenty of unemployed programmers and engineers in this country.

      They should treat it like interest rates under Greenspan. Tech is cyclical. They can lower or cut the H1B quotas during down times for techies.

    2. Re:It's time to... by chumpieboy · · Score: 1

      Mod the parent post up!

      That's the point; if the need from which the visa program was generated is no longer valid, then the program should go as well.

  105. Pro H1-Bs bring up race card again !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the Record ! The pro-H1-Bers are the first to play the race card. This always happens on any immigration discussion.

    Advocating a major reduction in the number of H-1B visas issued and enforcement of our immigration laws shouldn't be construed as advocating hostility toward foreign workers. Even those who've violated the terms of their visa should be treated with respect. Ultimately, the excesses and abuses of the H-1B visa program are the fault of the Congress which has bowed to the high-tech lobbyists.

  106. Foreign companies must pay caustom fees on IP by aspelling · · Score: 1

    Two new laws are required: 1. US companies who give contracts to India/China/whatever for SW/HW/HDL development must pay custom fees as automotive industry pays for every car imported. Nowdays IP is a product. 2. H1-B workers must have a protection plan. If company misused them they should be able to go to INS and inform about it without threat of beign deported. The best way is to give permanent residence to every H1-B worker who reports visa fraud. Most H1-Bs are sick and tired of their own countries and wants to become Americans.

    1. Re:Foreign companies must pay caustom fees on IP by praksys · · Score: 1

      1. US companies who give contracts to India/China/whatever for SW/HW/HDL
      development must pay custom fees as automotive industry pays for every car imported. Nowdays IP is a product.


      Trade in IP is largely one-way. The US produces it. Everyone else buys it. The out-sourcing of IT jobs, and the importing of foreign workers is just a tiny trickle in the other direction. What this means is that the US will start imposing tarrifs on IP shortly after hell freezes over.

  107. You aren't paying attention by acidrain69 · · Score: 1

    2,500 substandard employees??? (or whatever the quoted number was)

    I could understand 50, maybe 200 substandard employees, but this is sheer genocide of their workforce. They are most certainly excising the higher paid americans to go with lower paid H1-B's. Why else have all these barriers to the american workers?

    Don't be a fool. Just taking Sun's "substandard employees" comment at face value is ignorant.

    --
    -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
  108. Always mucking up the issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To all of those who keep saying such irrelevant things as "Americans are lazy" or the job belongs to the person with "better skills" etc, SHUT THE HELL UP. You are under the mistaken impression that your uneducated opinion matters.

    The issue is that companies are exploiting H1B to allow non-US citizens to enter the US and illegally fill positions for lower wages -- Shrugging off the cost of doing business and driving down salaries -- or "to save money and make the shareholders happy." If the position is advertised in the US market and skilled applicants who are capable of filling a position are turned away in favor of cheaper imported labor, that is a violation of law and the companies should be punished.

    This is not the same as a corporation's ability to outsource jobs to another country.

    These are two distinctly separate items.

    If you and a thousand of your coworkers were laid off for financial reasons, and then the corporation imported 2,000some H1B workers to do your jobs, that is illegal.

    If you and a thousand of your coworkers were laid off for financial reasons, and then the corporation outsourced your jobs to another country, that is completely within the law.

    SO SAY SOMETHING EDUCATED OR SHUT THE HELL UP.

    This message paid for by supporters of SHUT THE HELL UP, a subsidiary of I HATE YOU AND WISH YOU WERE DEAD, Inc.

  109. Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to own a steel company, and while the unions are a pain in the ass, a good deal of the competition comes from countries that are run by dictators who pay their people in a meal a day. You can not compete with a country whose work budget is next to nothing, and the workers are forced to do their jobs or starve to death.

    A good deal of the Russian steel companies do just this. Most of the small countries that were part of the former USSR were overtaken by mafia and the people have no choice but to work. Actually, I am surprised that no one really ever talks about this - seeing that so much attention is given to human rights problems in China.

    Besides, Chinese steel is shit. Unlike the Japanese, the Chinese send over the steel they don't want. Nobody uses Chinese steel unless they really have to.

    By the way, I used to fight like hell with the unions. I made my money off of mostly foreign steel, but I still know that American steel companies are damn competitive.

  110. BRAVO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And again I say bravo!

    National preference for jobs, benefits etc. is completely legitimate. This concept is too often criticised by the caviar leftists of various persuasions, who often live in the chic neighbourhoods in the capital cities, let it be said.

    Americans first in America and so on. It's quite simple really.

  111. Not an issue of racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is an issue of an AMERICAN company not hiring AMERICANS who are qualified and there is a large pool of these people and instead finding a way to undercut the fair market value of a humans work. How are the people in this country going to compete, how will they feed thier families, pay the rent, Americans have a lot more debt. Quality will probably suffer because I think American Universities do better than Banglore Tech.

  112. Stay in school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So because you are "in college", you understand economic principles so well that you equate capitalism with completely open borders for human labour. I'm not going to even waste my time on you.

    1. Re:Stay in school by Brushfireb · · Score: 1

      No. Not becuase i am "In college" but becuase I take quite a few economics and business classes.

      Again, I stated very clearly that I was taking the perspective of a WORLD economy, not some isolated or semi-isolated country. Debating over the economics of this would be silly, not to mention wrong (IE - the world WILL be a free market economy someday, at least I HOPE so).

  113. Ever Hear of L-1 Visas? You Should... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not just H1-B visas that they are screwing
    us with. See the following link for yet a another
    visa program that you probably haven't even heard
    of. I hope Sun get's walloped.

    http://www.vdare.com/roberts/l1_visa.htm

  114. Finally by moankey · · Score: 1

    All I have to say is I hope it goes through. Too many times whether contract, part time, or fulltime I see the H1's slowly taking all the jobs in an office where to regular John and Jane jobs start dwindling. H1's are to supplement a workforce that is not able to meet demand, but if we have huge supply like right now then there is no reason to hire the H1.

    What with California now firing its elementary school teachers, being charged the highest per gallon for gas, and highest level of unemployment, its nice to see people putting their foot down. Hopefully something happens for the better of the average Joe.

  115. MS, too. And don't forget L1 Visas by youattd · · Score: 1

    Can't leave MS out of this. Check out http://www.washtech.org/docs/html_ppts/01.php where MS's Sr VP Windows Division pushes for more outsourcing. On slide 6, he even talks about a "twofer" of Indian "heads".

    'course MS may have to do this since the FASB may decide by the end of this month that stock options have to be treated as an expense, so the only two profitable divisions at MS may not look so profitable any more. (yeah, I know this was hashed here, but the discussion I saw was pre-Enron, and before Intel, Amazon and a bunch of other companies voluntarily saying they would treat options as an expense.)

    And H1-B is only half the story. Check out this article on L1 (and H1-B): http://newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/3/12/123 733.shtml

  116. Cost of Living by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

    Cost of living and average salaries are lower in India. The American worker has to feed his family too.

    At the extreme end of the spectrum, sending work overseas to countries with lower cost of living is self-destructive. Your workers are your customers' customers. If your workers can't afford a U.S. lifestyle in the U.S., then your customers have fewer customers... which means they don't need your products.

    But... it's a screwed up game that happens again and again in capitalism. It is to everyone's mutual bennefit in the U.S. if the jobs stay in the country. However, the first corporation which can export the jobs has an unfair advantage, allowing them to squash the competition while reaping huge profits. If there is nothing there to stop them, they can't be blamed for doing it. It is as much self-defense as corruption.

    The same forces unfortunately apply to government too... the first governor who takes the kickbacks for allowing such a thing to take place could be made be rich enough that they don't have to care how poorly the country fares.

    I'm sure that if I knew anything about economics, I would know a name for this pattern.

  117. HAHAHA MOD THIS UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  118. IT Union by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need an IT union, how about that.. I'm sick and tired of getting crappy wages. I propose a walk-out by all IT employees across that nation, see how that affects their bottom dollar...
    You get what you pay for, getting cheap labor nets cheap results.

  119. SUN breaking law. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    While the law may be flawed, it is what it is and SUN is clearly in violation.

  120. Cause of the recession? by mjh · · Score: 1

    I am not an economist, so forgive my ignorance... BUT, I wonder about whether or not one could argue that the existance of H1B visas had a material impact on the economic recession we're currently in.

    Here's what I'm thinking, and if you ARE an economist, please correct me!

    It's generally accepted that the current recession is a consequence of the fall of the tech sector. Right? And the tech sector fell because of unrealistic P/E ratios on stock prices. In an effort to get those P/E ratios more in line, one of two things had to happen, either the price had to drop or the earnings had to increase. One way to do that is to cut expenses. For almost EVERY company the single biggest expense is human resources. If you can cut labor costs, then you can get your P/E ratios up w/out having to actually sell more.

    So Sun, et al, lobby congress and get the H1B visa program passed, and they cut expenses. P/E's can be improved... eventually. First you have to fire all those people. Those people increase the jobless rate. The market sees this, and reacts negatively, putting more pressure on realistic P/E ratios. And now the only way to increase P/E ratios is to actually sell something that someone wants right now. We can't wait anymore because we need to get those P/E ratios fixed now.

    Except for the fact that the biggest technology consumers are the technology workers, and larger and larger numbers of them don't have any jobs. And those that do, are worried about their jobs, or are about to lose their jobs, or are accepting pay cuts or .... whatever they're doing, buying new technology is not what they're interested in.

    Kaboom! P/E ratios do not get back to a sane level, and the market jumps ship, killing lots of companies and unemploying tons of workers, curtailing the spending of all of those people. Now, couple that with Enron, Worldcom, Tyco, and Adelphia.

    Of course, you could argue that Sun (et al) doesn't sell to consumers. They sell to banks, to CNN, to ... fill in the blank. But banks sell to consumers. CNN sells to consumers. If the consumers aren't switching to use technology delivery of those services, then the banks and CNN and ... aren't going to buy from Sun (et al).

    Ok, so I'm an idiot. I know that. Does this hold any water?

    --
    Key to financial independence: Spend less than you earn. Save and invest the difference. Do it for a long time.
  121. No Unions - Outsourced IT should be taxed by tommck · · Score: 1
    The US should tax imported "knowledge work". If we add a 100% tax on the money paid _for_ outsourced work (not the money paid _to_ the worker), the "gotcha" of just outsourcing the whole thing to India goes away.
    We already do this with cars and other manufactured goods. We just need to start applying some old techniques to the new world.
    Simple...
    And that way I don't have to give Johnny Five Angels (my Italian-American Union Rep) 10% of my paycheck for nothing.

    T

    --
    ---- It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told.
  122. Possible Repercussions by Shugart · · Score: 1

    If this keeps up I can imagine some interesting repercussions. 1. What kind of damage could and army of disgruntled, out of work hackers do? 2. Would Open Source suddenly find many more volunteers to make companies products worthless? 3. What about the possibility of economic terrorism by programmers comming into this country via H1Bs?

    --
    History is so yesterday!
  123. Re:H1-B isnt such a great deal for the Indians eit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "People come here, settle down, buy a home, start a family, become part of the community." First mistake. It is temporary with no guarantees. Rent until you are sure you can stay. "Don't like your working conditions? Don't think you're getting a fair wage? Fine, then leave your home, family, and friends and leave the country. H1-Bs can't quit a job and look for other work." H1-Bs are in many cases making a lot more money here, have exponentially more opportunities, and better working conditions. They know the risks. A H1-B is just that, a temporary permit. Temporary means temporary. Don't want to take the risk then stay in your country.

  124. "Insightful" ? by bigmouth_strikes · · Score: 1

    Oh how I want to meta-moderate this moderation... The poster not only does not know about H1Bs, but obviously he never thought about reading the article either.

    --
    Oh, I can't help quoting you because everything that you said rings true
  125. Microsoft does it in canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously look at how many employees they hire from U of Waterloo and pay a fraction of what an University graduate from the US makes.

  126. Re:Different Work Culture (FOLLOW the JOBS!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real problem isn't that there is too much freedom for companies to search for workers worldwide, the problem is that there is too little freedom for employees to do the same. H1Bs and other job exports should require employee supplying nations to provide work visas for an equivalent number of workers. That way the employee can choose the work culture/pay/cost-of-living/work-life balance that best suits their talants and personal preferences. A few silicon valleyish areas within the U.S. have very competative pay compared to rest of world, but when you start looking at vacation, benefits, health insurance, job security, cost of living, flexibility... most silicon valley companies can't compete with counterparts overseas.

  127. Consider Writing Your Representatives by jimkski · · Score: 1
    Ok, so they may be $un's paid representatives (afterall, who pushed through the H1B cap increases in congress afterall?). You can automatically generate a fax or an email here that will reach all the senators/representatives in your state/district.

    This link is union afiliated, which I'm ambivalent about, but it is a way to give ourselves a voice and let the politicians know that we're concerned about America's middle class being gutted.

    Note that presidential candidate Gephardt is now talking about going to the WTO to establish worldwide minimum wage requirements. So there are some politicians who seem to be thinking about this.

    --
    yea i stole your sig- whats the big deal, it sucked anyway.
  128. ok to buy a foreign product but not to hire? by hopeless+case · · Score: 1

    Someone please explain to me why it is o.k. to buy foreign products (which supposedly deprives american workers of jobs in the industry that produces said product) but it is not o.k. to hire foreign labor.

    Don't both actions deprive americans of jobs?

    Or does either?

  129. Another story of interest, the H1-B loophole by The+Slashdolt · · Score: 1

    available here....

    --
    mp3's are only for those with bad memories
  130. Don't buy their shit anymore. Use LinTel instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't buy their shit anymore. Use Linux/Intel instead. Why use expesive Sun boxes when a low cost PC with Linux can do the same job faster.

  131. All your government owes you troll by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is the ability to not worry that when you come home, someone is standing there saying "this house and your land is mine" (apart from the bank of course...)

    If one person can't take care of him/herself, then how do you expect a small group of people like the government to be able to take care of a much larger group like whiny IT workers?

    If people are not personally responsible for themselves, then the government wont be either. That's just how things are.

    If Jobs go overseas, then do something else!!! People are always complaining here that the music industry is like the horse and buggy making industry - are you saying the government should lock down those jobs and makes sure the music industry lasts forever just as it is? Those jobs aren't even going to go overseas, they are just going Poof!! At least with the jobs overseas companies still need a US liaison to oversee what is being done.

    As for jobs, you said it yourself - you can always go work in a munitions factory. Or join the army and do something that really protects your family instead of whining how your $80k a year IT job might go overseas.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:All your government owes you troll by b!arg · · Score: 1

      Or even start your own business...beholden to no one but yourself...

      --

      Everybody dies frustrated and sad and that is beautiful
    2. Re:All your government owes you troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't wait until you're laid off, you insensitive asshole. Think about someone else for a change.

    3. Re:All your government owes you troll by HiThere · · Score: 1

      That's fair. If they don't legislate monopolies into existence. If they don't subsidize corporations. If they don't...

      Well, the government isn't playing fair, so you should expect people to get upset, even if they don't choose the right target for their anger. But then the government has long experience in fooling people into blaming someone other than the government for the problems that the government has created.

      That said... 1) I don't believe that anyone has invented a practical way to run a society without a government, and 2) Organizations that represent centralizations of power tend to support other organizations that represent centralizations of power. If you know what should be done about it, you know more than I do.
      (N.B.: Yes, I know the rhetoric about how the good government should regulate the evil companies. Doesn't work very well though. The regulators tend to mainly devise regulations that keep out competitors to those already in the business.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    4. Re:All your government owes you troll by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      Thats it then. Lets all admit defeat. Universities in the US will no longer offer computer science and computer engineering classes since the demand has dropped to zero (the jobs will be worth far less than the cost of the degree). Everyone who is a programmer either goes back to school (if they saved enough money) or goes to McDonalds. Technological development in the US grinds to a halt.

      But thats OK because the companies got to save a buck for their shareholders this year.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    5. Re:All your government owes you troll by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      I don't know what should be done. All I know is that expecting the government to do anything for you is stupid. Sometimes they do help, which is nice, but you shouldn't live by the motto "Oops! Well, that's a government problem now.

      One on my favorite sayings is "Trust in god, but row away from the rocks". You can just replace "god" with government there and you get exactly the mindset people should have dealing with any situation.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  132. dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  133. Not Just About Dollars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think there is another ascpect to this that
    many people are over looking. Yes, dollars is
    a big part of it but there is also the mult-
    cultural (race) aspect. This is an opportunity
    to engage in multi-cultural (re)engineering.

  134. Another reason for immigration reform by wayward_son · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The H-1B fiasco is not the problem, it is a symptom of the problem. This is yet another reason massive immigration reform is needed.

    The INS wants to deport Hitesh Tolani, but gave renewed the 9/11 terrorists visas - AFTER 9/11! The whole system is bad and needs to be reformed from the ground up.

    Then we can talk about solving this problem.

  135. The middle man... by OneFix · · Score: 1

    Many of the multinationals are skipping the "middle man" so to speak and are simply moving whole departments to India...

    There really isn't anything illegal about this and they get to take advantage of a much lower wage/hr...

    Of course, when enough tech employees are employed in this way, the wage will go up and the monetary advantages will be less...

  136. This is a good point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try designing computer equipment with these people, trust me you will be very confused, seriously it will take these HB1 people 5-10 years of living here to effectively communicate, seriously it is better to hire people living in America for these jobs and make life easier for programmers and management.

  137. you are blind by acidrain69 · · Score: 1
    Americans in general are very unproductive. So Sun and other companies, bring in worked from India to replace their lazy unproductive employees or in this case, also overpaid employees


    What proof do you have of this?

    Even if you have proof, do you really believe that Sun had 2,500 lazy workers? 2,500 lazy workers that helped make Sun the company it is today?

    Look at the evidence. The tech market is slowly dying, Sun is in big trouble. It makes sense for them to cut off the leg to save the patient, and they are doing it in an illegal manner by hiring these H1B workers to replace a LARGE portion of their workers.
    --
    -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
  138. The real problems are as follows... by ErichTheRed · · Score: 1
    Seems like there's a lot of annoyance with H1-B visas and the abuses they invite. Here are my points:
    • It's capitalism. If someone is willing to work for a tenth of the salary that your current employer is, then what right-minded business owner would scoff at that chance? It's inevitable, and people are just going to have to adjust their thinking.
    • IT is different now. The scary mainframe guys in the machine room who know the accounting system back and forth are going away as off-the-shelf software replaces the homegrown stuff. It may suck, but all software sucks, and OTS packages can be tweaked to suck less cheaper than home-coded stuff.
    • Same with sysadmin work. Systems aren't "autonomic" yet, but even Windows boxes are developing real sysadmin tools (like scripting capability, fewer uptime disruptions for changes, and others). Results are lower number of staff needed, and lower salaries for those that stay.
    • Programming is also a commodity. If I (a sysadmin, and definitely a non-programmer) can whip up something quickly in a visual design environment, imagine what a "real" programmer could do. With the dearth of machine resources out there, doing it "small and fast" is no longer important...getting it to just work is, and there's no convincing CxOs otherwise anymore.

    Given these facts, why is it a surprise that companies outsource most of their IT now, or send in lower-paid workers to do an equal job? If you want to stay in IT, you need to do one of two things. You can prove you're an added value to the business you work for, not the same as the security guard or night janitor. Or, you can work for an outsourcer. Believe me, that's no fun; I've done it. They work you like crazy for peanuts.

    Also, a lot of people suggest unionizing. I'm from working-class stock, so I know how effective the unions can be in protecting basic workers' rights. They can also price themselves right out of the market.

  139. Not exactly, its even weirder by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    Fasion models don't count as "specialty occupations", but rather the law applies to both people in specialty occupations and fashion models!

    h1-B says:

    in a specialty occupation described in section 214(i)(1) or as a fashion model, who meets the requirements for the occupation specified in section 214(i)(2) or, in the case of a fashion model, is of distinguished merit and ability, ... or (c) who is coming temporarily to the United States to perform services as a registered nurse,...212(m)(1)

    214(i)(1), which defines 'specialty occupations' says the following:

    (i)(1) For purposes of section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b) and paragraph (2), the term "specialty occupation" means an occupation that requires-

    (A) theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge, and

    (B) attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty (or its equivalent) as a minimum for entry into the occupation in the United States.

    Good thing the federal government took time to consider the plight of fashion models.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  140. AMA by 0123456 · · Score: 1

    "Doctors are numerous all over the world. Why don't they come here and charge half? Because of the AMA."

    Why do you think medical care is so expensive in America? In a large part, because the AMA deliberately restricts the supply of doctors in this way.

    Now, I'm not sure about you, but I certainly have no desire to support an organisation that deliberately works to prevent the poor from getting good medical care at a decent price.

    1. Re:AMA by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      so you're for getting rid of the insurance companies and getting a single payer health care system?

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
  141. o fudge you plaintiff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    have you seen the poverty in india? these guys dont keep the money, they send ALL EXTRAS back home. you greedy americans take what you have for granted...

  142. aboo says: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you white guys are bery bery lazy. we will work harder and be smarter than you.

  143. The H1-B Syndrome -- Or, How To Fuck Everything Up by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 1, Troll


    The H1-B Syndrome
    ==================

    Companies suffering from H1-B Syndrome will begin with an IT department
    staffed with skilled, educated American workers who know what they're doing,
    and take pride in their work. They are payed well, happy, and loyal to the
    company.

    Once they get everything working to perfection, a shithead beancounter
    upstairs who can't tell the difference between a server and a refrigerator
    decides it would be "cost effective" to replace the American IT workers with
    a sixpack of Hindus who will work for $0.38 cents an hour.

    A shithead Department Manager, sensing his opportunity to make it big, will
    get wind of this from the beancounter, pinkslip his workers, and hand over
    the keys to the sixpack of Hindus half a world away who could give two fucks
    less than half a rats ass about doing the job right.

    Meanwhile, the executives upstairs will shout "This will save the company
    millions!!" and pat eachother on the back for thinking of it . They'll go
    home early, buy another minivan, and take the kids to Disneyworld.

    Over the next 6 months, the Hindus on the other side of the planet slowly
    fuck everything up to the point where the company's systems are on the virge
    of collapse. They aren't held accountable for their actions, so they drop
    their service contracts and move on to the next dumb-ass American company
    who thinks outsourcing their IT staff is a good idea.

    The executives get home from Disneyworld and discover this, so they fire the
    guy who suggested the Hindus, and fire the Department Manager that OK'ed it.
    Meanwhile, they work on calling the original American workers back in to fix
    the problem.

    The American workers then scramble to fix the mess that the $0.38/hr Hindus
    left behind, trying desparately to meet the company's deadline in the hope
    that if they do so, they can stay employed at the company. Six months later,
    the new Project Manager will complain to the new Department Manager that the
    project is behind schedule and over budget. So the new Department Manager
    picks up the phone, pushes a few buttons, and calls up the beancounter (who
    STILL doesn't know shit about IT ) asking for a way to be more "cost-effective".

    Lather, rinse, repeat.

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

  144. Here is how it works. by dbc · · Score: 2, Informative
    Let me tell you how this works. I've been a hiring manager with H1-B holders on my team.


    1. Employer is requred by law to advertise the position, a job already filled by an H1-B holder. These ads are easy to identify, they are very, very specific, and are low-cost small-type ads. They specify US citizenship required.
    2. Clueless folks that can't smell these ads send in resumes.
    3. Employer is required to document why each and every respondent doesn't qualify.
    3a. Some resumes are so far off that an HR drone can check a box and file the resume in a drawer.
    3b. Hiring manager (ie, the schmuck knowns as "yours truly") gets to phone interview all the rest. Are you a US citizen? No? Buh-bye. Then a list of very specific questions, all referencing the ad. No recent experience with very specific CAD tool? Buh-bye. Schmuck checks appropriate box, ships stack of paper back to HR.
    4. Immigration lawyer completes paperwork.


    At my employer, salaries for H1-B were the same as anyone else. Nothing except "what have you done lately?" mattered at salary time. We had a lot of H1-B's, and a lot of open reqs, so no jobs were going to H1-B's that would not have gone to citizens. But of course, times were different then....ie: hot. I'd hate to see the stack of resumes an H1-B ad would pull today.

  145. I could very well be by gatesh8r · · Score: 1

    IANAL, nor an immigration specialist. :-P

    --
    Karma whorin' since 1999
  146. Re:Slashdot "Capitalists'" Hypocrisy by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

    By the way, it _is_ possible to get $4.00/hr

    Not in the US - that's well below minimum wage.

    --
    "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  147. Re:H1-B isnt such a great deal for the Indians eit by forkboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Which is exactly why companies that heavily rely on H1Bs are so evil...not only are they depriving our own citizens of jobs, they're also mistreating and exploiting the foreign labor that comes to replace us. They do it because they can. Indians will let themselves be worked 60-70 hours a week for the same salary that the cute white little administrative assistant is getting (hell, probably less) because, well, it beats the alternative which is sitting in a pile of your own filth in India hoping to get a job that pays enough so you can eat.

    After world war II, there was a big grassroots movement to buy only American made cars and such. I'd like to see it taken one step further and only buy software, hardware, or services from tech companies that replace thousands of american workers with cheap exploitable foreign labor.

    --
    This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
  148. Freedom Of Labour by Dan-DAFC · · Score: 1

    An interesting point, and this process is more advanced in Europe where European Freedom of Labour laws dictate that all workers in the European Union are free to move between the various member states and have the same rights as local workers.

    So for example, an Italian is free to go and work in Ireland, a German can be employed in Spain, an Englishman in France etc.

    Things will move further along this path next year when the EU is expanded from 15 to 25 members, with countries like Bulgaria and Romania joining. However Turkey will not be joining yet as the current member states are concerned that Turkish workers would flood Europe with cheap labour.

    The only barriers to this type of economic migration are cultural and more specifically language differences.

    --
    Suck figs.
  149. Hahaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    while some of you are wanking on the right stand of your (jew-owned) government.

    Hey dudes, you are living in america. The land of opportunities.
    Just imagine how big the opportunity must be for a Indian engineer,
    to receive a better wage in another country.
    America is so liberal,
    right wing and free, its eating its own children.

    Yeah, enjoy the party as long as you can.
    And die with honour, in true Roman style!

    But don't whine like a jew.

  150. H1-B breakdown at Sun by nolife · · Score: 1

    Stats for Sun Microsystems in Palo Alto care of h1b.info

    More can be found by searching for Sun at http://h1b.info/lca_search.php

    --
    Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    1. Re:H1-B breakdown at Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I guess they're paranoid about some "damn furinur" getting their information:

      2002 LCA Database > Not Available

      Sorry, the LCA database is not available outside the United States

  151. So what? by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    Would you rather pay someone $240 a day for 10 hours of work, or $4 for two people to put in 16 hours of work a day?

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  152. Payback time by SourceHammer · · Score: 1

    All that software sold on the promise that it would decrease costs BY REDUCING LABOR,
    built by those whose jobs are threatened now - threatened by actions ALSO designed to reduce costs.

    The irony.

    --



    Open source development is my way of competing with the low-cost programmers in India...
  153. These people deserve more!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should not be fired, farmed out or otherwise. Qualified engineers are underpaid and overworked. My father is the CFO of a company, and the most under appreciated and underpaid employee is the Civil Engineer who my father says is one of the smartest people in the company yet is payed less than people in the construction department who are almost incompetant and have no college degree. This guy has a 4 yr degree and is a Publicly Certified Engineer. They also replaced an Arcitect with an indian immigrant who was willing to work for less, guess what they are regreating it now no one can understand what the guy is saying, he is good at his job but he and the constomer can not talk about what is needed in a building. The truth is companies are inefficient, business people are overpaid, there is too much concentration on quantity not quality. Companies should hire the best and pay them accordingly.

  154. No Hans Blix of visa skill inspections by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    You expect that what ever government entity that determines [skill shortages], to be better than the patent office is at finding prior art?

    Amen!

    There is almost zero provision for enforcement. IIRC, the company simply has to sign a paper saying that the positition requires hard-to-find skills. After that there is no followup, no inspectors, etc. It is a blank check.

  155. Re:The H1-B Syndrome -- Or, How To Fuck Everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd mod your ass up.. but alas, no points.

  156. Tiger Penis Soup Troll WHERE ARE YOU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Again, we have another H1-B/Jawa story and the Tiger Penis Soup troll is nowhere to be found!!! Come back to the SlashTroll community TPS Troll!

  157. That's not the issue by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    The guy at sun in charge of this stuff is an Indian and he said that sun prefers Indians to Americans. If that's true then it's racism and totally illegal.

    The other issue is that sun is subverting the H1-B program by hiring H1-Bs at lower cost then american workers, which is also illegal, by H1-B.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  158. If not here, then there by alanjstr · · Score: 1

    In my (very large) company, they're offshoring work and laying off American employees. The CIO wants to look good by cutting costs. By sending work to India, they don't even have to go through the effort of getting a visa.

  159. Such a simplistic view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Doesn't anyone know the numbers on this apparent "crisis" ? How do you know that the anger over H1 visas aren't the result of some whiney people who lost their job ? How do you know you weren't fired for some other reason ?

    This is not a new idea, having cheaper people work for you. It's not just technology. From what I've seen on the job boards these days, NO one will take H1 visas because it's too much hassle.

    To say that US companies are going to fire their higher paid citizens so they can hire foreigners is not only simplistic, it's very naive and short-sighted.

    If it's not, then why do I still get contract jobs ?

    1. Re:Such a simplistic view by Jhon · · Score: 1
      How do you know that the anger over H1 visas aren't the result of some whiney people who lost their job ?
      I was under the impression that H1 visas were to provide US companies with skilled labor when there wasn't enough available in the US. I *DONT* think H1 visas were to provide US companies a means of lowering their labor costs at the expense of american labor.

      There may be valid arguements with regards to 'IF A will work for $1.75/hr then let company X hire him! Supply and demand! Capitolism!' etc. etc. etc. However, that is a discussion that is completely unrelated to what the purpose of H1 visas are supposed to provide.

      -jhon
  160. Sun H1-B suit by morleron · · Score: 1

    I'm glad that someone is finally taking this system to court. American corporations have been abusing this system ever since it was introduced in the late 1990's. Is it a coincidence that Sun was applying to bring in 2,400 H1-B workers at the same time it was laying off American engineers? I doubt it.

    The truth is that H1-B workers not only work for less than their American counter-parts, they are also much less likely to complain about working conditions, number of hours worked, etc. because they know that they can easily be sent back to wherever they came from. Far too many companies bring in H1-B workers rather than investing in re-training their current employees. It's time that American high tech workers started fighting back against a system that is designed solely to enrich corporations at the expense of American workers and the communities they live in.

    Then, there is the national security aspect of the situation. Are these H1-B applicants subjected to background checks prior to being allowed into the country? Not that I have ever heard of and I've worked with a number of H1-B workers over the years. Do we really want to entrust the electronic infrastruture of this nation to depend on people whose first loyalty is not to the U.S.?

    BTW, I have no quarrel with the people who apply for H1-B vaisa. Everyone has, or should have, the right to try to improve their position in life, and H1-B workers are trying to do that. My quarrel is with those corporations who use H1-B workers to fill positions for which qualified Americans are available.

    My big question is - who do the corporations that abuse the H1-B system expect to purchase their products when they are busy laying off anybody who can afford to do so?

    --
    Impeach Barack Obama for violating the Constitutional requirement to be a "natural born" citizen to hold the office of P
  161. it's about corporate greed by Etrigan_696 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sure - we are not "owed" all the luxuries Americans get, I'll agree with that. However, you are missing something: Neither is the corporate CEO. When a company like sun gets rid of American workers that they actually have to pay and hires H1Bs they can get "half-off", where do you think all that extra money goes?
    Does it go to help starving babies in africa? no.
    Does it go to help starving babies in china? no.
    Does it go to help starving babies in the US? no.
    Or even:
    Does it go to Sun's R&D dept? no.

    The money goes into the wallet of the rich men who did it in the first place.

    We have hired the government to "promote the general welfare" is how it is worded in the preamble to the constitution. For this service, we pay taxes. The government is supposed to defend the common man from the powerful and greedy. That includes greedy corporate executives willing to remove the big screen tv from your living room and put it in his own.

    If you think losing your job to a foreigner with an H1B is nothing to get upset over - try doing it yourself sometime.

    Most people in this thread are missing the point. It's not about racism. It's not about losing our jobs to the "damn foreigners". It's about protecting private citizens from corporate greed. That's one of our government's jobs, and they're sucking at it.

    1. Re:it's about corporate greed by Undertaker43017 · · Score: 1

      Totally agree! I wouldn't say the government sucks at protecting their citizens from corporations, the problem is they don't even try. Every politician, regardless of party, is bought and paid for by these corporate types, to do exactly what they are doing, nothing!

    2. Re:it's about corporate greed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the constitution again. You will note that until 1913 no one payed income tax!

    3. Re:it's about corporate greed by junkh3ap · · Score: 1

      You guys are all hilarious.

      1) The government's protection of one's "general welfare" is to keep Osama and his ilk from putting your women into bondage,etc. NOT to keep someone from being "greedy and powerful"

      2) There is NO law against being greedy, nor is there a law against being powerful. There are laws against the MISUSE of greed or power however, but that is different.

      3) It's not like the "greedy and powerful" collect craploads of cash to hide from the common man. Even if they DO save that money, they most likely do not save it in cash under their mattress. Which means that it's either liquid, in which case the storing institution (i.e. a bank) uses that asset for other means while paying that person for the use of the money...but the bank makes money on it in turn. OR it's in non-liquid assets, such as a house, car, etc., in which case MORE also received the benefits of that money. You'll prolly knee-jerk and say "that's trickle down economics, so you're a facist pig." If so, read it again and tell me where I'm wrong.

      4) Companies, as a matter of practice (but not without exception) are soley there to make money - for themselves, and for their shareholders. A company should be free to do that. If they can get cheaper labor overseas, so be it. If YOU don't like it, get into another industry. And yes, I'm a programmer too, and yes, I've been through rounds of layoffs from the dot-bombout so this is not a "holier than thou" stance. If I get to a point where I cannot make the living that I want programming, instead of bitching about what I'm owed by others, I will simply change my OWN circumstances.

      5) Related to #4, the market should determine what a particular position is worth. We as programmers should NOT receive compensation soley based on what we THINK we should receive, or what we have received in the past. It's a different world. Good talent is cheap. Deal with it or do something else. Sheesh.

      Flame away.

    4. Re:it's about corporate greed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well said!

    5. Re:it's about corporate greed by siskbc · · Score: 1
      If you think losing your job to a foreigner with an H1B is nothing to get upset over - try doing it yourself sometime.

      I think that's the point - I wouldn't look at it any differently than losing my job to an American, as I'm not an uber-nationalist or racist. I work with many people with H1B's, and I don't feel threatened by them. I don't want to lose my job to someone else, but if I do, it's likely because I'm underskilled or overpaid, and I'm not the type of person to look for someone to blame for my problems.

      Most people in this thread are missing the point. It's not about racism. It's not about losing our jobs to the "damn foreigners". It's about protecting private citizens from corporate greed. That's one of our government's jobs, and they're sucking at it.

      Yeah, I want to see where the Constitution says that part of its job is to keep "damned foreigners" from taking our jobs. OK, so it's not racism, it's xenophobia. Good job. And by the way, whose job is it to protect the foreigners from angry and irrational private citizens?

      The justifications for these arguments are laughable, because it's the same crap the Turks face in Germany (the Gastarbeiter), and the Jews faced everywhere they've ever been. "It's not that we hate you - we just don't want you taking our jobs." Right. Same old bullshit.

      It doesn't matter where the people come from - my job is to make sure I'm simply better-qualified than them. And that's all there is to it. If you can't, it may be time to go back to ITT Tech and update your meager skills.

      --

      -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    6. Re:it's about corporate greed by barryfandango · · Score: 1

      So - to clarify: Sun lays off "thousands" of employees and replaces them with migrant workers for half the price. Assume an average 80k salary.

      At the minimum, you're suggesting that the CEO of sun did this to give himself an $800 Million a year raise? How do you know none of it went to R&D, or anything else for that matter?

      --
      In all matters of opinion, our adversaries are insane. -Oscar Wilde
    7. Re:it's about corporate greed by Nept · · Score: 1

      When a company like sun gets rid of American workers that they actually have to pay and hires H1Bs they can get "half-off", where do you think all that extra money goes?
      Does it go to help starving babies in africa? no.
      Does it go to help starving babies in china? no.
      Does it go to help starving babies in the US? no.


      Actually Yes to all 3. The corporations do take home more money (by cutting costs) as to the H1B's (by increasing profits). If they have a family home, which would starve from lack of work, then yes, they may be saving themselves from starvation.
      Not that the corporations care . . .

      --
      "Teachers leave us kids alone ..." - Roger Waters, Pink Floyd
    8. Re:it's about corporate greed by codingOgre · · Score: 1

      3) It's not like the "greedy and powerful" collect craploads of cash to hide from the common man. Even if they DO save that money, they most likely do not save it in cash under their mattress. Which means that it's either liquid, in which case the storing institution (i.e. a bank) uses that asset for other means while paying that person for the use of the money...but the bank makes money on it in turn. OR it's in non-liquid assets, such as a house, car, etc., in which case MORE also received the benefits of that money. You'll prolly knee-jerk and say "that's trickle down economics, so you're a facist pig." If so, read it again and tell me where I'm wrong.

      Continue to follow that flow of cash and you will see where you are wrong. Greed is a very sharp sword. Continue your logic...20 people in America could hold *all* of the wealth in this country, what would become of this country then?

      --
      Space may be the final frontier, but it's made in a Hollywood basement. --Red Hot Chili Peppers, Californication
    9. Re:it's about corporate greed by Ragica · · Score: 1
      4) Companies, as a matter of practice (but not without exception) are soley there to make money

      There's the problem. That this point of view is even entertained as the most bizarre fancy, let alone taken for granted in society. If you care at all.

      But that's okay. I'm personally willing to do better work than you for at least $5 per hour less. So happy starving, noble martyr for the cause of commerce and fat ass CEOs.

    10. Re:it's about corporate greed by junkh3ap · · Score: 1

      Read what I wrote again. Please explain to me the money trail, or at least use your words correctly. You don't mean "hold" all of the wealth, you mean "control" all of the wealth. And again, there are measures to punish the MISUSE of greed and power. I said exactly what I meant and stand by it.

      Now if elected officials don't uphold those measures to punish the misuse of wealth and power, we have the ability to change the status quo. But the status quo is easier, and people are lazy. But again there is NO law against greed. There is NO law against attaining wealth. Misuse is a different matter.

    11. Re:it's about corporate greed by junkh3ap · · Score: 1

      Ok, again, read what I wrote. My "point of view" as you call it is not that. It's a fact. Please offer evidence to the contrary. If you don't agree with the practice, then a market-driven, capitalist society is not the place for you (that is not a derision, it is again, a fact).

      As far as your second point, I have a couple of responses:

      1) I will do my best work regardless of my pay. My point was that if I am unhappy with my pay, I will get a raise, deal with it, find a new job or find a new career instead of dictating my "wish" for what I'd like to be paid, and bitching about not getting it.

      2) I'm hardly starving. Again, as I've said, I have dictated my own circumstances. So while you may consider someone out there who has a job as a "...happy starving, noble martyr for the cause of commerce and...CEOs," I am simply comfortable in my current circumstances, in a position where I'm both happy with my job AND the morals of my company. If those circumstances change to where they do not conform to my own needs/values, I WILL CHANGE MY OWN CIRCUMSTANCES, instead of dictating that others do it for me.

      Our society hinges upon the willingness of individuals to lead their own lives instead of sitting around complaining about the lives of others.

      What I find interesting is that in my experience (anecdotal as it is), those who take your stance _generally_ 1) Wouldn't turn down millions of dollars to do a job, and 2) If all of a sudden found themselves wealthy, would consider themselves "different" from the other "greedy and powerful" people, and not subject to the pitfalls of such circumstances. I believe it to be an arrogant stance based on envy and a feeling of powerlessness. Those are a bad combination.

      Oy.

    12. Re:it's about corporate greed by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

      The money goes into the wallet of the rich men who did it in the first place.

      I'll let you into a secret: there is not a wealthy cabal that controls the world. When people say "shareholders", they might think they're talking about the Illuminati but in reality they mean "anyone who holds units in a mutual fund" or "anyone with a 401(k)" (in the UK, think ISA or Private Pension). Shareholders are just ordinary people like you and me. There is no conspiracy.

  162. No one will probably read this, but... by teetam · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Many of the comments in this thread really disappoint me. On various other topics, post after post deals with freedom in someway on /. Freedom from monopolies, freedom from buggy, closed source software, freedom from restrictive patents, freedom from any kind of government activity that restricts freedom of technology.

    It is perhaps a sign of the times that the same principles do not apply when it comes to immigrant workers.

    It is astonishing to me that the same people who want free, open markets when it comes to selling American products abroad (including software), want a protected, closed market for employment in US alone. Why this hypocrisy?

    For those who argue that every foreign worker who gets a job is taking away an American's job, can I say the same thing about American exports? Everytime a foreigner (individual or company) buys software from America, many jobs are taken away from that country! After all, if the same software had been written in that country, many of them would have been employed!!!

    Let us do this - let us stop all immigration and close the borders completely. All jobs will go only to (native-born) Americans. Hooray! However, we should also stop exporting software to other countries so that they can enjoy the same benefits. How about that?

    Seriously though, if you want foreign workers to demand a higher pay, abolish H1B visas and other such bureaucracies. Give a green card to anyone who comes to work in America. This way, without the noose of H1 visa, foreign workers will also demand a higher pay as per free market dictates.

    --
    All your favorite sites in one place!
    1. Re:No one will probably read this, but... by Skyshadow · · Score: 1
      I don't think that the responses in this thread are out of line with the normal /. thinking. Really, the H1-B debate is about how large software companies are able to fuck over American workers by exploiting foreign labor -- it's not as if it's a good situation for any of the "little people" involved.

      The US government has two jobs here that are sort of in conflict: They need to allow US companies to compete globally with as good a position as possible, but it also needs to maintain the standard of living for its citizens. At this particular time in history, the pendulum between those two is waaay over towards helping companies, because the companies have money to give politicians who'll help them and the citizens (IT workers, specifically) don't have any sort of organized effort to help themselves.

      Many people have responded to this thread bragging about how lean they live and how there's no right to two cars or vacation or houses, but that's backwards thinking -- the whole point of working is to better our economic situations. Otherwise, we'd all be free to volunteer for worthwhile causes or sit on our asses and watch TV or whatever floats our boat.

      As a citizen of the US, I expect my government to do everything in their power to maintain my standard of living (which I acknowledge is superior to that of 90% of the rest of the rest of the world's population, something for which I am glad). That's one of the things I pay taxes for.

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    2. Re:No one will probably read this, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is astonishing to me that the same people who want free, open markets when it comes to selling American products abroad (including software), want a protected, closed market for employment in US alone. Why this hypocrisy?

      We want free open markets selling American products overseas because other countries can freely sell products here in America. (well, except for when an industry, like steel, buys enough Congressmen and/or Presidents) We want it to flow both ways, you see. And with trade agreements we have been pretty successful in the past with slowly opening previously closed markets.

      We want protection for U.S. workers because there simply is no "flow both ways" for workers between countries. Right now, the U.S. lets workers in, but few other countries let U.S. citizens work there (for any significant lenght of time). And the odds of getting other countries to open up their labor markets are about zero. In recognition that we can't get the other side to open up, we want our side closed too.

      Hey, I'd LOVE to be able to hop a plane to somewhere else in the world, visit a few places with my C.V., and get a job. But other countries, unlike the U.S., protect their workers. Since I can't go there, I see no reason why they should be able to come here.

      Slam shut the gates. Then start making treaties with other countries that guarantee free flow of labor as well as free flow of products.

    3. Re:No one will probably read this, but... by teetam · · Score: 1
      I agree with you that the eventual goal is for everyone to be able to freely pursue whatever makes them happy - the constitution, in fact, guarantees it. And if a better standard of living makes you happy (I don't see why not), you should be free to pursue it.

      But, the key word there is that you are "free to pursure" it, not that the government will ensure it. Then, we are straying into communism, which as we all know only lowers everyone's standard of living.

      The question is - how can a US citizen improve his standard of living? Does he do that by improving self and his skills, by making himself indispensable to his organization based on his knowledge and capability and then demanding (and getting) a higher pay? Or does he do that by trying to reduce competition in the first place? This unfounded paranoia about foreign workers comes from many people choosing the second option, because that is an easier shortcut. Becoming better than the competition is harder than eliminating the competition.

      If any American developer out there is under the impression that he is not in competition with developers from all over the globe, he is only deluding himself. Regardless of whether the foreign worker comes to the USA or stays where he is, he is a threat to the American worker, but in a good sense.

      The current H1 system is stupid. We have both commented upon this in the past, in an earlier thread. It creates a H1 worker, who is many ways a slave to his company. Remember that the worker doesn't get the visa, the company gets it. With this control over his living and absence of freedom to work, the company is then able to underpay him and that is what hurts the American worker.

      The problem will not be solved by eliminating foreign workers, but by "freeing" them and ensuring that they also demand the prevailing market rate. Then, the companies will choose only based on skills and isn't that what we all want?

      --
      All your favorite sites in one place!
    4. Re:No one will probably read this, but... by TRACK-YOUR-POSITION · · Score: 1

      Seriously though, if you want foreign workers to demand a higher pay, abolish H1B visas and other such bureaucracies. Give a green card to anyone who comes to work in America. This way, without the noose of H1 visa, foreign workers will also demand a higher pay as per free market dictates. If you read more carefully, I think this is what most of the posts here are saying--they aren't complaining about competing with foreign born workers as they are complaining about competing with indentured labor.

    5. Re:No one will probably read this, but... by Kefaa · · Score: 1

      It is perhaps a sign of the times that the same principles do not apply when it comes to immigrant workers.

      Actually, the same principles do apply and H1Bs pervert the process. Instead of bringing the best and the brightest to the US, as the policy was designed to do, it is used far more often to bring the cheapest.

      Are they qualified? Many certainly are, but that is not the requirement. The requirement is they have specific talents or knowledge that makes them unique. Something a US citizen could not supply.

      What I have see instead is a company will bring over 100 developers. They will then put then put them, dorm style, into apartments. These workers are then paid a good wage in terms of where they came from, while undercutting and undermining the US worker they displaced. In essence, they are subsidized workers.

      In a few months they move on or go home. Having made a fair living considering their point of origin while at the same time, making the contracting company a bundle and displacing American workers. All while taking money out of the country, without adding value.

      Let us do this - let us stop all immigration and close the borders completely. All jobs will go only to (native-born) Americans. Hooray! However, we should also stop exporting software to other countries so that they can enjoy the same benefits. How about that?

      Irrational and extreme come to mind. Other countries are not forced to buy software from us and many have government policies specifically protecting their workers in such cases. Or, should India create a package like MS Office and ship it here, I see no issue, just competition. Why is an American worker worth less than other coutnries doing the same?

    6. Re:No one will probably read this, but... by darkov · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's called American hypocracy:

      - We want free open markets, except our agricultural markets
      - We want to stop maniacal leaders having the option of using weapons of mass distruction, but we'll keep our nukes, thanks.
      - Competition and free enterprise is the one true way, as long as it doesn't threten our jobs or our standard of living even if we can;t be bothered to get off our fat, lazy arses and work harder and/or innovate.

      And by the way, you're either with us or against us, so don;t try and point out our hypocracy, otherwise you'll be in the axis of evil before you know it.

    7. Re:No one will probably read this, but... by darkov · · Score: 1

      What a load of crap. In Australia IT people get special visas: 4 year, untied to a particular employer. In the UK sponsered visas are pretty liberal. Both visa's are easier to get the American ones.

      The fact is you can hop on a plane and work where ever you want, if you bothered to do some investigation.

    8. Re:No one will probably read this, but... by Dielectric · · Score: 1
      Let us do this - let us stop all immigration and close the borders completely.

      Fine by me. Meddling around the rest of the world hasn't done us much good so far. Jeezus, look at the mess we've made for ourselves in the Middle East. I think we've got enough natural resources to survive on our own. Let the rest of the damn world fend for themselves, I'm tired of the US propping up worthless economies.

      I'm so pissed off right now, I could breathe fire. I don't normally say crap like this, but dammit, I'm tired of it all. I'm sure there's a valid reason for us to protect all those people, but we're not doing a very good job at it.
    9. Re:No one will probably read this, but... by darkov · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      As a citizen of the US, I expect my government to do everything in their power to maintain my standard of living (which I acknowledge is superior to that of 90% of the rest of the rest of the world's population

      God, you live in a dream world. Why don;t you go the whole hog and get the government to pay you just to exist? Have you considered that the only way to maintain a better standard of living and improve it is through competition, change and efficiency? That would mean that someone like you, obviously unenterprising and expecting others to do your work, would need to get fired.

      And lets face it, Americans don;t live better that 90% of the worlds population. They may think so, but since they don't pay any attention to the rest of the world, they don;t realise that the quality of life for much of the rest of the western world is better than theirs. Where I live there is universal health coverage, unemplyment and sickness benefit that doesn;t stop after some arbitary time, less crime (espacial gun crime). Amercia is a brutal place. If you don't have money you're no-one and nothing.

      You really outght to wake the fuck up...

    10. Re:No one will probably read this, but... by teetam · · Score: 1

      How exactly does your data about Aus and UK immigration make my post a load of crap? Please clarify.

      --
      All your favorite sites in one place!
    11. Re:No one will probably read this, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is the situation as it's written in the lawbooks, and then there's the true situation.

      A few countries may have special visas, but that doesn't matter if they simply decide not to give you one, does it? Gee, my application must have been rejected because they thought I was a terrorist or something. Or perhaps it was because *in practice* you need a company to sponser you to get the visa, but companies want you to have a visa before they'll even interview you, well... I'm sure it was all my fault. Somehow.

      Oh, and when writing to about a dozen embassies requesting info on their countries' policies for letting foreign workers in, and getting politely worded responses that basically said "we really don't want any more, thanks", well I'm sure it's just my fault for not writing some more.

      Yep, all my fault. Why, the entire world is simply desperate to have Americans come in and take their jobs from their citizens, too. Yeah, must have just been me.

    12. Re:No one will probably read this, but... by donnz · · Score: 1

      Congrats for capturing the sentiment so clearly. As soon as I read the article I thought the same thing and this post was the "first read".

      --
      -- Free software on every PC on every desk
    13. Re:No one will probably read this, but... by teetam · · Score: 1

      I am sorry about my earlier post, I thought your post was a reply to mine and got confused. Sorry about that again.

      --
      All your favorite sites in one place!
    14. Re:No one will probably read this, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The question is - how can a US citizen improve his standard of living? Does he do that by improving self and his skills, by making himself indispensable to his organization based on his knowledge and capability and then demanding (and getting) a higher pay? Or does he do that by trying to reduce competition in the first place? This unfounded paranoia about foreign workers comes from many people choosing the second option, because that is an easier shortcut.

      You're overlooking something. Many developers have worked damn hard, put in the time to continuously update their skills, and not only made significant contributions to the organization, but saved the organization from extremely dire circumstances through massive effort -- and then been fired anyway!

      The majority of American companies do not reward hard work. They care nothing for updating your work skills. The skilled and the incompetent are treated the same, except for those cases where the incompetent are rewarded for their stupidity. All that matters is: will firing you make the bottom line better *this week*? Will firing you make your paranoid boss more secure in his/her position? Will firing you help make the stock price rise enough so the CEO can make an extra million on his options?

      It's a humbling experience to help a co-worker pack his things and take them out to his car because he was fired that day, knowing that he is a better worker and programmer than you could ever hope to be. And know that he was let go *because* he was good. And knowing that your turn will soon come.

      In this environment, reducing competition is sadly a more sure guarantee of employment than hard work is.

    15. Re:No one will probably read this, but... by pkretek · · Score: 1

      He is living in a dream wolrd, but maybe he is right about that 90% of world poulation.

      If you check Minature Earth - Flash or Text only or some more serious websites like State of World Population 2002, then yes the scaring thing is that only few percent of world popuation are living in acceptable living standards. A huge percentage of worlds Population has less than one dollar per day to live.

      But now, if you compare the USA to other industrial countries then the charts would not look soo great, actually I would expect the USA to be somewhere down the bottom on the list.

      I have never seen so many homeless people and ghettos like I do in the USA, even not in China (where I was living for one year).

      So yes again, many Americans are living in a dream World. Guys, wake up and open your eyes, go out on the streets and see. Saying the US is superior in living standart to something, is like if the president of Uganda was saying that his personal living standard in Uganda is much better then that 90% of the worlds population.

      whatever. it is just slashdot.

      p.s. For you americans, Uganda is one of the poorest countries in the world.

    16. Re:No one will probably read this, but... by iSwitched · · Score: 1

      I came late to this party, but this is as good a place as any to insert my $0.02.

      I disagree, the comments posted here simply reflect the frustration that I would expect in this situation. Regardless of the many H1-b posters who have reported a parity of earnings, it is a fact that US companies do use loopholes in the program to unfair advantage. As people who have paid taxes over the years, and whose earnings have been plowed back into local and national economies, are we racist or jingoist to believe that we deserve better treatment? I don't believe so.

      I am not familiar with Sun's case, but it certainly seems suspicious on the surface. To those who defend such actions, claiming it's all just competition, I'd like to offer a few statistics.

      Unless you truly believe that a US worker has never lost a job to a younger, lower paid H1-b, or you believe that when this happens it is always because the H1-b worker is superior to the Us worker in job knowledge and ability, then you must know it's NOT about competition, it's about U.S. corporate greed. For example, some older numbers from Business Week:

      "The average executive of a major US corporation made 42 times more than a typical worker in 1980. By 1990, that ratio was 85 times and in 1998, it had reached a staggering 419 times. "

      In a similar time period, averages for other countries ranged from around 10 to 110 times. What is it about top US-corporate big-wigs that justifies this disparity? Are they that much better than their international counterparts? Admitted that these are older numbers, but to this date, American executive compensation shows the highest such ratios in the world, in both good times and bad! In fact, during massive layoffs and restructurings, such executive are all too frequently rewarded.

      Bottom line, the Sun's of the world can find qualified US workers, and they can afford to pay them, but they won't.

      Typically, I am not one to run crying to the government for help, but clearly something is wrong here. At the very least it is time to show our disapproval of such actions with our wallets whenever possible.

      --
      "That naive cube! How long must I suffer this!" --Sheldon J. Plankton
    17. Re:No one will probably read this, but... by teetam · · Score: 1
      "Bottom line, the Sun's of the world can find qualified US workers, and they can afford to pay them, but they won't."

      How do you define "afford to pay them"? If Sun can find people who will do the same job for less, why shouldn't they? After all, if the developers get another job with better pay, no one will begrudge them for switching companies! Why should companies be forced to pay more than what is necessary for them to get the job done?

      When you buy something, do you choose the lowest priced goods that do what you need or do you buy higher priced "American" goods simply because you can afford them?

      Anyone who has ever bought a foreign product (cars included) because it represents the best value, has no right to complain about foreign workers. The principles involved are the same.

      --
      All your favorite sites in one place!
    18. Re:No one will probably read this, but... by hopeless+case · · Score: 1

      I think you hit the nail on the head. Another way to put this is to note that the same people who have no problem buying foreign products themselves when they are cheaper than the american products (and supposedly putting americans out of work who could have made those products) have a problem with american companies buying foreign labor to make the american products they buy.

      If american companies should hire only americans, then shouldn't americans only buy american products?

      It's hipocrisy to say otherwise.

      It never ceases to amaze me how sympathy and concern for others seem to end at national boundaries.

      I am also disappointed by these posts.

    19. Re:No one will probably read this, but... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      That's right. But I think this country can do better than this. Instead of just having this government-mandated H1B program which allows companies to bring in foreign workers at lower wages, we should lobby the government to change this program to allow kidnapping and slavery. This way, big corporations can go overseas, capture lots of IT professionals, and bring them back here and hold them in captivity, forcing them to code for free, under threat of torture and death.

      Anyone who has ever bought a foreign product, such as cars made in Germany and Japan where the cost of living is higher than the US and their auto workers are paid at least as much as ours, and the cars cost more for similar features, has no right to complain about competition from unpaid slaves. The principles involved are the same.

  163. who's hiring H1-B's anyways???!!! by ElvenSmith · · Score: 0

    I do not understand the fuss. Who is hiring H1-B's anyways in this economy?? [oh well..who's hiring *anybody* in this economy...?] I know of many fresh foreign CS grads who cannot get a job becoz NOBODY is ready to sponsor an H1-B anymore. No recruiter is ready consider a guy on an H1-B...the program is as good as dead!!! Worry abt outsourcing if u will ..but I do not think many fresh H1-B's are being approved by INS...

  164. Clearing up some H1-B Myths... by tepp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My fiance was an H1-B worker, so we've had to deal with the INS for awhile now.

    Contrary to popular belief, an H1-B visa does not guarantee a green card. These are two different things... H1-B allows you to work in a special field for up to 3 years (with extentions if you're getting your green card), after which you get sent home. A green card can be aquired either through your company, or through marriage. A green card allows you to be hired and fired like any american worker. It's permanent.

    I've looked at both methods for getting his green card. We were lucky his second company sponsored him, and we were able to continue it when he was later laid off because he was in the third stage. Had he been in an earlier stage, he would've been sent back.

    Getting your green card is a very tough process. It took us three and a half years to get his green card through his company. If you do it through marriage, it's supposedly shorter - but then they question your marriage, your relationship, pull out your wedding photos and ask him to identify a guy in the back row, etc. I'm glad we didn't have to go that route.

    Now the REAL problem for Sun here is, if they bring in a significant number of H1-B visa people to replace their tenured staff, then they're going to get a brain drain when in 3 years, all those people have to return to India. There's a population cap for green card applicants based on your country - it's very hard to get a green card if you come from India. So every 3 years they'll have a massive turn-over when all those immigrants go home for the mandated one year, during which they'll bring in new h1-b visas.... costing them lots of lawyer bills and a general loss of accumulated knowledge.

    Not a smart move for Sun. Save a buck today, loose important knowledge and spend money on lawyer fees tomorrow...

    --
    Tepp
    1. Re:Clearing up some H1-B Myths... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      if they bring in a significant number of H1-B visa people to replace their tenured staff, then they're going to get a brain drain when in 3 years, all those people have to return to India.

      Many managers don't know how to think more than 3 months ahead anyhow. They will probably be re-org'ed to a different department anyhow, leaving the mess to some other manager who will get all the blame when the fit hits the shan.

  165. Not exactly by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    If I think that it's wrong for Sun to 'prefer' people because of their race (Indian) that does not make me a racist. Quite the opposite, really.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Not exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do you really think Sun prefers them because they are Indian?

      Did you read the post, it says "lower-paid". I am sure Sun does not give a s*** if they are Indian/American/Inuit/Iraqui as long as they are lower-paid

  166. Silly gook ... by Glonoinha · · Score: 4, Funny

    >Would they have a problem with, say, a Canadian citizen, or an Irish, British, or Australian one?

    Australians, Canadians, British, and Irish, are all de-facto Americans (in that order, decreasingly so,) generally with funny but mild accents.

    They eat American food, can be understood on the phone by other Americans, bathe daily (well not sure about the Brits, but :), can be brought home to an American woman's family without her Archie Bunker father throwing a fit, might even know who Archie Bunker is ...

    --
    Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
  167. How to keep your value by Artful+Codger · · Score: 1

    It's reasonable and inevitable that given the same skillset, the lower-rate worker is preferable. I've had the opportunity to work with engineers from India, Eastern Europe and elsewhere, and they're damn good usually, and they don't whine or throw out attitude like some north americans. I enjoy working with them

    How I personally compete and keep my rate up is by:
    1) skip the attitude. I love to code, and I try to show it. I jump when an opportunity presents itself. Stay current, be useful.
    2) leverage your north american knowledge. I use my business contacts, my local experience, my knowledge of north-american culture and resources, customer expectations, business practices etc, to make myself more valuable to my north-american employers.

    If you think that you're owed a high-paying job just because you were born here, welcome to the global economy.

    --

    ... plans that either come to naught, or half a page of scribbled lines...
    1. Re:How to keep your value by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      How is this advice useful, unless you're a consultant? Anyone working as a technical person (rather than a customer rep, sales rep, etc.) isn't going to be helped by their business contacts, local experience, etc.

      Basically, it seems the bottom line is, forget all that we've heard for the last 10-20 years about how important math and science is, because it isn't. Being a technical person will get you nowhere but unemployed. The only way to stay valuable is to become a people person--manager, salesperson, etc.

      This is fine for people who have good people skills, but what about those who don't, but have excellent technical skills? The people who grew up wanting to become computer programmers, engineers, scientists, researchers, etc.? By screwing them over, not only are we creating a large segment of society that's unemployed (or underemployed), disillusioned, and potentially destructive, but we're eliminating our country's hold on technology and our claim at being technologically advanced. How do we advance our space program to improve science and explore the unknown (and possibly profit from asteroid mining)? How do we create new drugs to cure disease (and thereby improve our economy--look at how important biotech is to it now)?

      It's one thing to displace some low-paid, unskilled manufacturing workers who can be retrained for something else. It's another to eliminate all the high-paying technical jobs in your country just to raise short-term profits.

  168. If companies actually paid the prevailing wage... by inteller · · Score: 1

    .....as they are legally required to do, then I think a lot of these H1-Bs would suddenly look a lot less "skilled". The h1-B program should be handled like the draft. Call them up when they are needed, but pick from the existing job pool in times like this.

  169. You fucking ignorant foreigner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't you learn more about America before you comment on it, you ignorant fuck!

  170. How do I donate to this guy's legal fund? by emil · · Score: 1

    And will this set a precedent that the rest of us can use?

  171. Here's an idea...what does everyone think? by Kenrod · · Score: 2, Interesting

    US Companies aren't supposed to hire H1-B's unless they can't find US talent to fill the position, right? Well, if a company is so desperate to fill a position, I say let them pay a hefty tariff per H1-B employed. Something around 50-100% of the H1-B's salary should be about right. This will do 2 things: It will make certain that a company is really desperate before they hire an H1-B, and it will make them more likely to hire a citizen and train them, the costs would be far less than paying the tariff. Also, it would ensure that H1-B's hired to fill a temporary need don't become permanent workers (they aren't supposed to be permanent anyway, right?).

    --
    Good heavens Miss Sakamoto - you're beautiful!
    1. Re:Here's an idea...what does everyone think? by minard · · Score: 1
      first point: how much do you think it costs right now in a) legal fees and b) relocation costs. Having been through the process myself (I'm a British H1-B holder) I can tell you that neither is trivial. It isn't cheap to pull someone in from overseas. The INS process is truly a nightmare.

      To your second point, about H1-Bs being supposed to be temporary, that is not correct. The H1-B is the first step in the employment related immigration process. There is no other employment based immigration method than to start with an H1-B. When you establish residency, then you can apply for a green card to become a permanent resident. The INS refers to this as the "principle of dual intent". The name "temporary" refers to those without a gc, who are "permanent resident aliens". So there you go. I'm a temporary alien.

  172. Re:H1-B isnt such a great deal for the Indians eit by OneFix · · Score: 1

    First, H1-B is a temporary visa. People come here, settle down, buy a home, start a family, become part of the community. But unless they take steps to achieve a more permanent status, such as citizenship or having a green card, they can be kicked out of the country at a moments notice. And with the current political climate, I wouldn't recommend overstaying your visa in the USA right now.

    If you don't persue citizenship, then you don't really diserve it...I mean, even those born here had ancestors that went through something similar (or are Native Americans/etc)...why should H1-Bs be different?

    Second, H1-B is sponsored by a company. The worker only has the legal right to work for that company. Don't like your working conditions? Don't think you're getting a fair wage? Fine, then leave your home, family, and friends and leave the country. H1-Bs can't quit a job and look for other work. It's hard not to get settled in and used to a place after a couple years, so there are plenty of stories of people who thought of themselves as permanent residents getting shipped off.

    Umh, I think they actually allow 30 days for you to obtain another H1-B job...and if you honestly posses the credentials required for an H1-B, then it should be no problem for you to find another job...

    Third, part of the requirements for H1-B is workers get paid prevailing wages. One of the ways companies get around that is bringing in people with little experience. "Sure, the H1-B doesn't get paid as much as the citizen engineer. But one has 1 year experience and the other has 10, so you can't make a direct comparison." But what happens as the years go by as the worker with the visa gets more experienced and worth more in the marketplace? As the disparity between the prevailing rate and the H1-B's salary grows, the company as two choices. They can give the guy a raise. Although if they wanted to do that, they could of kept the original citizen worker that got laid off.

    Umh, from what I hear, a lot of H1-Bs don't even posses the skills they claim...they instead have obtained certifications that aren't worth much (but noone else knows that) and they simply learn on the job...

    Of course, the whole thing could be fixed by requiring the company to pay for an independent assessment of skills before they are hired as an H1-B.

  173. Re:Slashdot "Capitalists'" Hypocrisy by Hayzeus · · Score: 1
    Not in the US - that's well below minimum wage.

    While I was really speaking in the mathematical sense, note that minimum wage for workers in the US who receive more than $30/month in tips is actually $2.13/hr. The current US minimum wage for other non-exempt workers stands at $5.15.

    Of course under some circumstances, salaried workers can also end up making less than minimum wage, depending on salary versus actual hours worked.

  174. Attitude Adjustment by killdashnine · · Score: 1

    I think, more than anything, that much of this would be fixed by a national attitude adjustment.

    American Labor Unions are killing the U.S. For example, a chemical plant I worked for (as a scientist) settled the last union labor negotiations with the union folks making $33/hour. Largely, these were unskilled, high-school educated (maybe) people.

    In contrast, most of the lab personnel supporting the plant had at least undergraduate degrees (Chemistry, Biology, etc.) and many were contract employees making $12/hour.

    The math? Straight up, the laborer makes $68,640/year. The contract lab worker makes $24,960/year. But the clincher is that the union folks make mandatory overtime at 1.5 to up to 3 times the normal rate. Overtime comes in when you work something more than eight hours per day. The story is likely the same everywhere in the U.S.

    I don't think the problem is at all about foreigners working for less money. Rather, I think the problem is that many Americans simply expect too much for what they're really worth, particularly uneducated, unskilled laborers. Anyone can screw a bolt into a damn car, and people in other countries are willing to do it longer hours and for a lot less, likely without medical benefits.

    Unfortunately there's not an easy solution to the problem other than to start realizing that rampant over-consumerism under the guise of the perceived need for luxury SUVs, sprawling homes, and other unnecessary materialism is the real culprit. Spend less, need less. That's really hard to do once you're spoiled ;)

  175. Sun Sued Over H1-B Workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Behold the huge sucking sound Ross Perot spoke of. As
    Americans, your time at the top is over. It's all downhill
    from here. There will be no high paying jobs unless you
    are an executive of a multi-national with all it's employees
    being offshore (or government). For the rest - shovels,
    brooms and McHappy meals. Ain't capitalism great.

  176. Labor Gripes by geomon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You white collar workers sound amazingly like the blue collar labor of 20 years ago. American workers were losing jobs to Asia and Latin America while many of you were still crapping your diapers. Tech workers have avoided substantive discussion of labor rights anywhere on this board unless it affects you and your skill set.

    Why? Because you like to get cheap electronics, automobiles (relatively speaking), and food.

    Where were you when Kenworth shipped their jobs to Mexico? Where was the outrage from tech workers when automotive assembly jobs were being shipped overseas?

    Face it: Your skills have become a global commodity that can move to regions of lower wages just as easily as the employee working the assembly line. The only way you can preserve your jobs for Americans is to purge yourself Free Trade rhetoric and start signing the song of protectionism.

    But that would eventually end up costing you more of your annual income. When you get protection for your profession, other industries will be lining up to get theirs. Pretty soon you are paying $8US for a head of lettuce because you have to pay minimum wage to a US citizen rather than $2/hr to an illegal.

    And as has been already been pointed out by other posters, these people need to make a living too. The money they send home improves the standard of living in their own country which stabilizes their society and lessens the possibility that the US will have to intervene with foreign aid, or worse, the military.

    When you push on one side of the balloon, the other side starts to bulge.

    There are no easy answers to globalized labor.

    --
    "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
  177. Not all of IT is doomed... by emil · · Score: 1

    Assuming worst-case scenario where everything that can move to India does, what has to stay here?

    • someone has to set up the network
    • likewise, boxes have to be obtained and installed
    • software packages, license key administration, and system setup will probably be done here

    I do think that some areas of IT are less vulnerable than others. I hope that I've guessed correctly.

    p.s. This page may be a surprise to many of you. Digital Equipment Company is alive and well in India, and many of the 20,000 people that HP laid off (thanks Carly) were replaced by H1-Bs from this subsidiary.

    1. Re:Not all of IT is doomed... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      someone has to set up the network

      The physical connections will eventually be plug-and-play, while the rest is software controlled. It will not matter if it is done in Nebraska or India.

      likewise, boxes have to be obtained and installed

      Why do you think Sun is pushing "network appliances"? In a fully networked environment, you don't need a physical person to configure stuff at your desk. Either you have no local hard-drive, or it can be accessed remotely, and your screen and UI can be mirrored remotely also.

      software packages, license key administration, and system setup will probably be done here

      It depends on how it is packaged and installed.

      While I agree that *some* physical stuff will have to be done locally, there will still be a glut until the existing network people die off or become lawyers or something instead. If 500,000 are network experts, but the economy needs only 250,000, then where do you think the other 250,000 will go?

  178. Re:Slashdot "Capitalists'" Hypocrisy by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

    Relize only East Coast/West Coast/ Big city programmers make $50+ yr salaries. Where I live once you get 40-50 miles away from the city wages drop 25-50% for the same job. I get worried about this stuff because it's the internal people that get hit first...after all my boss will get cheap and have the audacity to stop raies or cut pay long before the big city bosses do because he thinks he can get away with it. It think that's true with most small businesses.

    I'd venture more programmers are living on 35-45k/yr without all the perks that there are in all the other "hi-tech" jobs.

    Maybe compaines will grow up inland rather than in silicon valley. Caifornia is over-rated as a tech area--the main reason is close to the port to catch imports! Personally, I lime in Michigan, and think that the inland states will soon recapture many of the industries that ran away in recent years. If only for skilled people refusing to play the HI pay/stress/real estate game and stay home to work. Wages won't go up, but only a few parts of the US make the big $$$ of SUN or MS, and consumers still live there.

    Also, if there's such a lack of US workers, why aren't the companies doing more to educate US youths? Properly Trained US workers still kick the pants off most of the rest of the world in terms of innovation and creativity. What I've seen is that most US kids barely get a chance to explore careers before college. Not all of it has to do with companies, but they could do more to insist on education goals for US students--of course then they would have to hire them! Kinda the point though, educate to get good pay. Local people need to see the need for tech education as well. Most US schools are viewed as "Providers" of education to student "Consumers" rather than as a mutually benifitial environment to learn by both parties in.

  179. Put Your Money Where Your Mouth Is. by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 1



    My fiance' owns Sun stock. After reading this article, she's decided to sell off all of her remaining shares. Why? Simple. She doesn't want to have anything to do with a company who openly desires to shaft people like her soon-to-be husband. You guys might want to think about doing the same. Ask yourself, do you hold stock in a company that wants to shaft you in the same fashion? If so, why are you helping them ream you?

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

    1. Re:Put Your Money Where Your Mouth Is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe she should have saved her stock for the future, supporting you.

      If everyone sold their stock in companies who decided to make cuts due to the economy and adapt, then that would be a lot of selling, since it's just about every company alive today in this industry.

    2. Re:Put Your Money Where Your Mouth Is. by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      Do you really think that Slashdot geeks have enough combined wealth to make even the slightest difference?

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  180. More like... by No.+24601 · · Score: 1
    "...younger, more-qualified engineers from India."

    This is no surprise whatsoever... in fact, it's hilarious for anyone's seen that 60 minutes special on IIT. Those guys were literally saying, "If we didn't get into IIT... we'd have to fall back on US schools like MIT and Caltech." Whoa! now they're a hot commodity on the US job market.... WHAT A SURPRISE!

    And Yes, better and cheaper should get the jobs. C'mon, we always love to boast how we're at the cutting edge of the tech industry, well surprise, surprise... we better continue hiring the top people out there, regardless of whether they're American.

    1. Re:More like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      very very few of the Indian engineers in the US are IIT grads. IIT is probably the most competitive university on the planet , those who get in are both brilliant and well disciplined. There's no way in hell that the average US engineer could compete against an IIT grad.

  181. what the law requires by Gnank · · Score: 1

    If your employer is breaking the law, call the DOL, call the media, and call your mom.
    This is from the American Immigration Lawyers Assoc site:
    EMPLOYERS ARE REQUIRED TO
    Protect wages: Employers are required by law to pay each H-1B employee a wage that is the higher of either the typical wage in the region for that type of work ("prevailing wage"), or what the employer actually pays existing employees with similar experience and duties.
    Protect working conditions: Employers cannot use H-1B professionals to break a strike and must notify their U.S. workforce when hiring an H-1B professional. Employers cannot make the H-1B nonimmimgrants work under conditions different from their U.S. counterparts, including hours, shifts and benefits.
    Recruit in the U.S. and not displace U.S. workers: Employers who use a lot of H-1Bs must first try to find U.S. workers before they can hire an H-1B. They also must attest that they are not hiring the H-1B if they have laid-off or displaced a similarly situated U.S. worker. Employers must attest to the above protections by affirmatively filing with the DOL and by maintaining a file available for public access.
    Subject to penalties: Employers who fail to comply with DOL regulations may be subject to investigation, civil and administrative penalties, payment of back wages, and even debarment from participating in key immigration programs.

  182. Re:Nothing wrong this this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    putting on pants and taking of you turban doesn't make you an american fucking sand nigger. troll on americans and you won't have a cock to offer. we should cut all your cocks off and put them in your turbans so that you can't tell americans off mother fucker. once again go back to the land shit and piss mother fucker and take your pencil dick with you before some one cuts it off.

  183. reparations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In order to make things right again, we should all get to have hot sex with Sumi Das. Me first of course:-P

    Sumi Spy Cam:
    http://www.techtv.com/interact/behindthescen es/sto ry/0,23350,3393782,00.html

  184. I am shocked... by No.+24601 · · Score: 1
    this post was moderated Insightful... it screams racism and ignorance:

    "hand over the keys to the sixpack of Hindus half a world away who could give two fucks less than half a rats ass about doing the job right.

    Perhaps, it's time to reevaluate the effectiveness of Slashdot moderation. This is supposed to be an internation forum, so there's no way in hell something like this should be modded up.

    ...and we wonder why Americans are so despised in Europe and the Middle East.

    1. Re:I am shocked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and we wonder why Americans are so despised in Europe and the Middle East

      Riiiight. Because Americans have the market cornered on xenophobia. I mean, look at how the French and the Germans openly welcome foreign workers. And I am sure that most middle eastern countries would love it if thousands of Americans were brought in to do jobs in their country!

      Get a fucking clue.

      If he had said "sixpack of <other primarily white nation>" would you be complaining? Who is the racist again?

    2. Re:I am shocked... by uncadonna · · Score: 1
      You are shocked that:

      this post was moderated Insightful... it screams racism and ignorance

      I'd mod him back down but somebody beat me to it.

      However, you should understand that Slashdot moderation is stochastic. The best you can do without paid and prejudiced editors is to distribute the editorial load and the editorial power. Not every moderator is a positive contributor, but in the long run the metamoderation process is intended to weed them out. On balance Slashdot still does a surprisingly good job of identifying the good stuff.

      See that "faq" link over there at the top left? Click it.

      (yeah, offtopic, I know... let it slide this time, huh? Once in a while these high ID numbers (eek 657,000) need a gentle clue.)

      --
      mt
    3. Re:I am shocked... by No.+24601 · · Score: 1

      Along this forgivably off-topic note: yes, I've done all the required RTFM and understand the process. I'm merely suggesting (though rather indirectly) that perhaps there should be an attempt to encourage international representation in the ranks of moderators. I mean it's not something I'd consider vital right now, but would definitely benefit the system as a whole. Moreover, since the Slashdot moderation is approximating a stochastic process, the algorithm behind which moderator are chosen should always be subject to discussion though of course in the proper forums for said discussion :)

  185. What did you do in Nam? by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

    >Management hasn't even tried to hide the fact that this guy is going to be taking over all my duties, and I expect I'll be out on the street looking for work inside of a year,

    So take his punk ass out into the alley and kill him, sprinkle some powdered sugar around to make it look like a drug deal gone bad.

    I was in a vehicle wreck about 15 years ago and the guy hired some high powered lawyer to hassle me ( he was blatantly wrong, the accident was obviously his fault but his daddy had lots of money so ... ) about three days before the court hearing the guy's Lawyer (Nelson Sharp in South Texas, scumback lawyer, for the record) was found dead, an apparent heart attack.

    Strange enough, the punk kid couldn't find any other lawyers to represent him.

    Is it time to take off the gloves?

    --
    Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
  186. H-1B cap set to change this October by Gnank · · Score: 1

    The current limit is 195,000 new H-1B visas per fiscal year. Employers lobbied for this temporary increase back when workers had the market advantage. The cap will revert back to 65,000 this October unless business does something about it.
    Tell your rep in Congress what you think about the cap.

  187. START CALLING THE TARDS "EUians" I GUESS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fucking EUians are fucking retards.

  188. If they can get away with this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am going to buy a whole bunch of land, buy a shitload of tents, and bring people in by the boatload from impoverished countries to make clothing. You think it is competitive now? Wait until I cut out shipping costs.

    There are a number of dictators willing to sell their people still, and I bet that more than a few former Soviet Block countries are willing to give me a few people. Why not - if American workers aren't competitive enough to compete with foreign workers living in tents and getting paid in food then they don't deserve to have jobs.

    1. Re:If they can get away with this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, do you need an overseer, um, I mean department manager? I can help you wring the last bit out of them, um, I mean maximize worker productivity.

  189. Country name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    In America, we hire Americans.

    You probably mean the United States of America, don't you?

  190. Why haven't they? Because the culture is broken. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 3, Insightful


    "Nothing is stopping the next Sun or Microsoft or Oracle or Intel from sprouting up as a home-grown venture in India, or wherever, given the supposed incredible talent and work ethics. Why haven't they?"

    They haven't because the Indian Hindu culture is, in some ways, one of the most disfunctional in the world. When a U.S. company hires a Hindu worker, it usually gets someone who accepts the caste system, for example. The worker generally has a long history of accepting things the way they are and overlooking even major defects. (I spelled the word "disfunctional" because I don't like the original spelling.)

    Remember that most heads of technically oriented companies are not technically knowledgeable enough to know whether a programmer is doing a good job. They hire on the basis of price and a little understanding.

    What hasn't become apparent to the companies that hire Indian programmers is that they aren't getting the same quality of work as they would from U.S. citizens. Good programming requires someone who constantly asks whether what he or she is doing makes sense. Good programming requires constant creativity.

    There are, of course, many Indian programmers who are excellent in every way. But most are the followers that their culture requires them to be.

    The result is that programs are being written that will have to be re-written, and much sooner than they would if they were done by programmers from a culture that prizes independent thinking. The real cost of Indian programmers is higher than U.S. programmers, not lower.

    The U.S. has been through something like this before. In the early 70's it became fashionable in the U.S. to hire PhDs. The reasoning was that better educated people would be better employees. But, after about 12 or 15 years, companies realized that people who had PhDs were often robotic crank-turners. Sure, some PhDs were interested in education, but most had just put in their time getting an advanced degree. The policy of hiring PhDs brought about some spectacular failures; they often did not have sufficient knowledge outside a narrow field.

    We are seeing a wave of self-destruction in the United States. The U.S. government has killed perhaps 3,000,000 people and bombed 14 countries in the last 35 years. (See What should be the Response to Violence?.) United States companies are destroying themselves. (Microsoft is, for example, driving people to Linux by annoying its customers: Windows XP Shows the Direction Microsoft is Going.) The U.S. is becoming a country in which law is disregarded and disrepected. (See Airplanes are safe, but laws often crash.)

  191. Get your facts straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    H1B does NOT require that a company prove that no American workers are available to do that job -- that is needed when applying for the Green Card. H1Bs only require that the employer pay the prevailing wage for the position.

    Also, it is possible to change jobs while in H1B status -- the future employer simply needs to apply for an H1B transfer for the candidate.

    -AnonCoward
    [ex H1B who was paid the prevailing wage and did change jobs while under the H1B status]

    1. Re:Get your facts straight... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      the future employer simply needs to apply for an H1B transfer for the candidate.

      But if they don't have one lined up already, then they only have a very limited time to find one before going back "home".

  192. make the H1-B portable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a nativist policy of restricting IT employment to US nationals will simply accelerate the export of these jobs to foreign contractors. People need to realize that India , southeast asia , and eastern europe are emerging IT powerhouses. What's now primarily a pricing advantage is quickly evolving into a quality and price advantage ( or at least quality parity and price advantage ). In 10-20 years it's likely that the majority of software and IT services will derive from these regions. The commoditization of IT services is being accelerated by the presence of foreign competition , but derives fundamentally from factors of scale , replicability , and diminishing marginal utility - don't blame the Indians , they're just lubricating this process.

    A better solution is to empower the H1-B worker by liberating them from the single sponsor model. Make the H1-B status portable so that H1-B's are not endentured to a single employer and can negotiate for competitive salaries. This would inspire companies to hire H1-B's primarily on merit , not the assumption that they can be coerced into working for below market wages. Those H1-B's that remain will be the cream of the crop and more than compensate for the native workers they displace.

    The other thing the US needs to do is to get serious about math and sciences education at the primary and secondary school levels , but this probably won't happen any time soon.

    1. Re:make the H1-B portable by BayAreaRefugee · · Score: 1

      This post is on the mark. The H1-B Visa program needs to be changed so that it no longer "indentures" the employee to the company that benefits the company itself but is a detriment to other non H1-B employees there and elsewhere.

      I worked as a contractor at Sun for a while and they brought in H1-B Visa'd contractors from another agency that "specialized" in providing H1-B Visad employees. Even though I and other non H1-B visad contractors did a majority of building of the infrastructure there and the high end maintenance for the tools we built there, our contracts were the ones that were ended, not these guys'. It was obvious that price was a big reason in that situation.

      I don't hold this out just against Sun. I worked there earlier as a permanent employee and like a lot of things about the company. I think this was a problem that wasn't specific to Sun. These same "body shops" that were servicing Sun were also providing the same loopholes for other companies like HP, etc. in the valley too. It was their way of keeping costs down while the cost-of-living exploded around there and kept other citizens away from that equation which didn't make for a good cost-of-living/salary ratio for those people who had choices.

      IMHO, the increased presence of H1-B visa'd employees actually increased the problems of cost-of-living in the Silicon Valley which basically has housing costs falling a lot now from the astronomical highs that it reached during the dotcom boom.

      In addition to the overpaid CEO's overinflating the prices in the local housing market there with their "falsely overpriced" stock options created by laddering scams from the investment houses, there were many of these H1-B visad people who were "stacked" into the harder-to-get lower priced housing which contributed to that mid-range housing scarcity and helped contribute to its higher prices as well.

      Most citizens wouldn't want to live like the three H1-B visad employees that were moved in with their families into a 900 sq foot apartment across the hall from me by their employer after my landlord kicked that family out as well as other tenants in the building to raise rents up to 40% on everyone there during the boom and corresponding housing shortage. If those workers weren't brought in as the "indentured servants" that they were, there would be less of these folks piling into those sorts of housing and more available to the rest of us at lower prices.

      It was cost of living that eventually had me move away from there to San Diego as my handle here indicates.

      In short, H1-B visa program allows companies to run their operations at artificially lower costs than they should in a given local market, which takes away jobs from those that aren't part of that program and inflates the costs to others trying to work in that market to compete against them.

      If the H1-B visa program were revised to make have it provide only employees that compete on an equal footing with everyone else here in the states, those companies that depended on that artificial lower cost structure would be either forced to go out of business or move to other places where the operating costs are cheaper which would provide a more natural law of supply and demand every place then. If all the Bay area is left with is expensive CEO's able to live there and work in their companies, they might at some point realize that there is a real ceiling to how much they can be given over the rest of their employees in their company for them to have a real and profitable business for their investors. Perhaps then they'll lower their own salaries, provide better salaries for native U.S. citizens, and the local economy will be more adept at providing a competitive living environment for U.S. citizens who might seek to move there to work.

      That being said, I have nothing against Indian or other foreign workers coming here to the U.S. In fact that diversity was one reason why I moved to the Bay Area to work to begin with. The system is what needs fixing!

  193. Cancel the H1-B program ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is the right thing to do. You don't need to educate other countries and export your technology, especially when your own workers are out of jobs.

    Some Indian programmers are excellent and very smart, others good, but the majority are mediocre and don't have a clue and have no earthly idea of what communication is.

    Companies can and do routinely outsource their IT departments to save a buck, but that's a big mistake in my opinion. Why not just outsource the whole company? You'll save more. Why not just get a cheap Indian CEO, you'll save even more? Hell, why not just outsource the entire country?

  194. Re:Nothing wrong this this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't America a great place to live???

    And some of us wonder "why do they hate us?"

  195. wait for a "code for food" program in africa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eventually the corporation will end up in africa exploiting the natives.

  196. Re:H1-B isnt such a great deal for the Indians eit by soul_on_fire2001 · · Score: 1

    First) They cannot be kicked out of the country on a moments notice, one wont be working for the company anymore but he is still listed as an employee of the H1 consultancy that sponsered his visa. I know a lot of friends who dont have jobs for the past 6 months on H1 visas.

    Second) You dont have to leave ur home, family, friends, and leave the country. What u do is transfer ur visa to another H1 consultancy or another employer. They can quit jobs and look for other work as they can transfer the visa, and there are H1 consultancies a dime a dozen that will agree to transfer ur H1 visa. No one is shipped off, they go back only if they are pissed off as they dont get a job for a long time or they find a good job in India and decide to leave.

    Third) Wrong again. No one demands a raise. Many H1s work for the salaries with minute increases in salary for three or four years. The difference between the experienced-H1 guy and the green-horn-H1 guy is so negligible it is not an issue with any company 99% of the time( doubt it ? call ur H1 friends ).

    Finally, this is not called abuse. This is called competition, the very thing that America stands for, the best one gets the cake. It doesnt hurt Indians, because if they had to go back to India after all many companies will lovingly embrace them because they have onsite experience and are ingrained with the American work system.

    I dont see how u got 4 points with so many factual errors. You really should check ur facts before u post something on /.

  197. Time constant of the system by mseckin · · Score: 1
    Well! This is a capitalist system. It is one of the best though. You try to make profit but also there are rules and these rules are enforced at a certain level. If you try to punish a wrong-doer before s/he does some thing wrong/against the rules, then you can't run the capitalist system at all.

    On one side corporates try to increase their profits by stretching the rules as much as possible, on the other side workers try to improve their standards as much as possible without losing their jobs. Goverment sides with the corporations, so they are much more powerful than the workers. However, goverment doesn't want to lean towards to one side and tip the system out of balance. Workers have some rights, union etc. It is a constant struggle, most of the time workers come from way behind. Like any other balanced system this has its own time constant.

    Now in reality this may be more complicated because of the globalizations. Globalization gives both sides another chance. Since other countries are not at the same level in terms of capitalist system, companies abuse laws (or non-existing ones), workers in poorer countries try to improve their situation and future. It doesn't come for free. For example, companies get burned because they need to train people in other countries, absorb the cost caused by miscommunication, difference in business culture, etc. They may not be able to see the profit of their investment, if for example the 3rd world country goes to war, decides to nationalize companies. The lack of laws may fire back, too. So it takes time to transfer business to other countries, it is not like kicking a beach ball. If the internet/IT boom and collapse hadn't been so quick, the disturbance wouldn't be at this level. The system would have had enough time to settle.

    You can complain, sue, curse etc. All that may help to improve the workers' case. But the time constant won't change much.

  198. Re:In short - tsarkon reports sun haters are lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree with this post. Mod parent up +5 Insightful.

  199. Dumb Ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is not at all like setting up shop in foreign countries. Rather than moving to a shitty foreign country and having to deal with corrupt governments, extreme poverty, military uprisings, and shitty healthcare these companies are bringing the workers over here where they can still pay them shitty wages and have all of the benefits the US offers.

    At least when you set up shop in a foreign country you have to accept the instability of the environment as part of the cost.

  200. Servants? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Right now H1B workers are basically indentured servants to the corporations who hire them. Corporations can make them work in tiny cubicles for 80 hours a week and the workers' choice is basically to suck it up or to quit and risk being sent back. The corporations are not upset with this situation.

    I don't know where you get that idea but it is not true. I am European and on an H1-B. I make $104,000 a year and work in R&D. I have a very flexible working environment and I make around 35 - 40 hours/week. When the time when the job does not interest me any longer, or they do not need me any longer, I will just go back to my home country without it being a drama.

    You know, that image of starving people with high education from very poor countries doing anything to enter the US and work for peanuts is something that is not always the case. In fact it is not the case at all. Most of the Indians coming to the US on H1-B's are from middle-upper class.

  201. Re:Nothing wrong this this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did read it. But did you read it?

    The paper is mostly about the growth rates of the countries. The annual growth rates for productivity and output have increased in the USA in the last decade (1990-2000), but still as far as total productivity and output, we ranked towards the bottom.

    So we our productivity and output is increasing. But like I said we are still behind the G7 countries in totals.

  202. H1-Bs come to Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need you.

    1. Re:H1-Bs come to Canada by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      We need you.

      Huh? Tech unemployment in Canada is high also.

    2. Re:H1-Bs come to Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will Canada let in Americans who'd like to work up there?

    3. Re:H1-Bs come to Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope not.

  203. Skills by derfel · · Score: 1
    I know there are many things that overseas workers can do just as well, however I've seen a big problem with the "get the lowest wage" attitude in today's American management philosophy. There are many situations where the less technically savvy CEO directs an even more clueless middle manager to take advantage of some cheap labor. For some reason, neither of them have the ability to analyze the actual cost of such a move. I've seen this with outsourcing, hiring new grads, and just plain hiring a person who will take less (whether immigrant or otherwise). An engineer with years of experience in the required technology, with commensurate salary, is laid off and replaced by someone with little or no experience. The new engineer takes a while to spin up, or fouls up the code and the schedule slips. This has happened to the point where the company pays millions in penalties for late delivery, all the while management is boasting lower expenses.

    I don't think this is really a problem with immigrants getting paid less, or overseas outsourcing. It is really a problem with how the performance of management in most corporations is measured. They make bad decisions that result in lower profits for the company, but they still get bonuses. This whole h1b thing that Sun did is probably a good example of this.

    As far as the cop-out "be good at what you do and there will always be a demand for your skills." In general, being very good at what you do doesn't mean that there will be demand out there because those doing the hiring and firing are not really qualified to determine the true value of your skills.

  204. what a putz by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

    This guy is suing over something that happened over 1 year ago?

    He only worked for Sun for 1-1/2 years? Sounds expendable in a sinking economy.

    Hiring younger people is cheaper, and less benefits are needed/wanted.

    He is in his 50's and probably finding that nobody can afford to pay him the salary "he deserves."

    His idiot lawyer wants to turn this into a class action lawsuit! Someone is looking for headlines.

    Indians and the H1-B sounds an awful lot like a excuse to create a crime. I am not sure, based on this article alone, that anything was done wrong by SUN.

    1. Re:what a putz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not that it matters, but what is the salary he deserves? I hear everyday about "over-inflated salaries" from the dot com days, but what does that mean? is 10/hr too much? 20? 30? what's the price point that would make people happy? If GNU people have their way, no one will get paid to write software anyway (or do anything high tech releated). So why not think about that for a moment, while you're living in a 1 bed room apartment with three guys who can't find work because most of the tech jobs are outsourced to India, and all the tech jobs at home at trashed due to H1-b visas... Think about how you're being squashed in the middle because you can't get a job flipping burgers or working as a janitor because the Mexicans will do it cheaper. All the while RMS will be sitting comfortably at home, with plenty to eat, talking about how free software should be, because he's got a grant. Yeah, what a fucking world this is turning out to be.

    2. Re:what a putz by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

      Well... if a newbie programmer (less than 5 yrs experience) thinks he's worth $70k/yr but the market only supports $45k/yr then this guy only deserves $45k/yr regardless of his age or social status (married, kids, etc). Eventually, tech workers will figure out that there job is no more valuable than most other non-tech workers.

  205. It's not the jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    that worry me. I'm fine if they can come over here and work. I've had a lot of international friends. What ticks me off the most is when they come over and piss all over the american people.

    I have a couple roomies, one is upper-caste Indian, doing a PhD. Well, he wrecked my other roomie's car, and in the courtroom had the nerve to say to the judge "You know, I like America, but the American people suck." F@cking bastard nearly got contempt, wish he would have. No I don't get along with him, but I have dozens of other Indian friends who aren't so arrogant.

    My point is this. It's fine if you come over to work or get your education. Sure you may take jobs from Americans. That's life. But if you come over here and start bitching and moaning about how bad it is over here and how the american people suck. Then get the hell out of here. Go back to your homeland where it is "better".

    Posting AC because I'm a concientious objector. You know, a coward.

    1. Re:It's not the jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an Indian, I think I know one such person you described above. Needless to say, I never got along with him. He was arrogant to his fellow Indians as well. And you know whom did he get along with best? An American who was known as a redneck in our dept!

    2. Re:It's not the jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Why are you using this forum to bitch about an obnoxious guy who could have been from anywhere, the US or India?

      2. Why are you using this guy as a cover to talk to down to all Indians starting with "My point is this.....".Not all of them are like that guy.

  206. Unions are for losers by 0123456 · · Score: 1

    Why would I want to join a union? I have skills that companies are willing to pay a premium for, so what possible reason would I have to want to group myself with a bunch of losers who don't?

    Unions make some sense for industries where skills are low and workers are interchangable, but no sense in a skill-based industry like IT.

    1. Re:Unions are for losers by kipple · · Score: 1

      Maybe you're a lucky one whose skills are not common. But what would you do when kids will have the same skills that you have and will be paid less than you?
      Also, given the recent lack of jobs in the IT market in the US, I think that workers *are* interchangeable (because a lot of skilled workers are unemployed).

      I'm not talking about you personally, of course... just think about it.

      --
      -- There are two kind of sysadmins: Paranoids and Losers. (adapted from D. Bach)
  207. What is dismaying... by Naum · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...here is a good deal of the comment content defending the H1B program that simply skirts reality.

    1. H1B visa holders are displacing American IT workers, regardless of whatever legal bullet point you wish to flash at me. It is a fact I can personally attest to it - twice, my job as an application support/develoopment programmer was supplanted by an H1B visa holder, and in one case my job was to train my replacement.
    2. H1B workers replacing American programmers is wrong. How can anyone justify adding an American worker to the unemployment queue for the sake of a cheaper, more captive immigrant worker is beyond me. Nothing against the visa holder who are motivated to advance and excel in a profession they desire, but not while skilled Americans are shuffled out of jobs and/or forced to work for lower wages due to the addition of a contrived, more captive, more restricted IT worker poll.
    3. The job advertisements for IT help reflect the sneaky, underhanded manner in which H1B holders are solicited to replace American workers. Instead of looking for bright, industrious individuals who are skilled and are eager to learn and tackle any task, a laundry list of skill set requirements and platform experience is dictated. Meanwhile, resumes and references from offshore can claim the H1B applicant possesses all of the necessary checklist prerequisites but there's no real way to authenticate it's indeed the truth. Again, from first hand experience, I can't tell you how many times the Indian offshore firm's pimp, er marketing guy, touted a prospective hire but then after seeing the guy/gal work for a while, it would be quite evident that the extent of this person's relevant experience was being handed a manual on the plane trip to America.
    4. Once upon a time, way back when, before dot-bombs and the ubiquitous prevalence of Microsoft on the desktop, employers would recruit programmer talent from the business side to address shortages. Aspiring wanna-be coders who arduously studied for a new company role would be given a chance to break in and serve the company in a higher position (many coming from customer service roles). They would endure cumbersome training sessions on their own time, and only a few would be chosen from the pool of hopeful applicants. It was a win/win deal for both employee and employer. After the implemenation of H1B, this is no longer done. In fact, it's had the effect of dissuading those who've already trained extensively and would otherwise be automatically drawn to fulfill a beneficial role in a computing discipline.
    5. Offshore migration of development/support work and importing of H1B temporary visa holders are not mutually exclusive trends. Any offshoring strategy, from the recent experience I've had in multiple instances, is heavily dependent upon immigrant liason agents, which utilize the H1B (or the L-visa) to augment the offshoring strategy. These lead level H1B holders interface between customer service/business user departments in the states and the team of juinor level members who remain in India (or the Phillipines, Malaysia, Mexico, etc. ...)
    6. You can quote immigration law or cite study statistics about how H1B are paid prevailing wage and such, but the truth is that while for some this may be, for many others it is not - as other posters have detailed in comment posts here, enforcement of H1B stipulations is lax and/or non-existent -- many visa holders are raped wage wise as Company A contracts to Company B which serves as "the bodyshop". Company A spokesman can simply say how much Company B individual is paid is up to Company B. Company B may likely not even be U.S. based, or if they are, they've engaged in repeated violations of U.S. labor law (see Syntel history) without paying much of a penalty for their misdeeds. Perhaps many will discount my anecdotal experience, but I came across a number of Indian H1Bs who "disappeared" in the states because of their restrictive employment
    --

    AZspot
    1. Re:What is dismaying... by ZenJabba1 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      H1B workers replacing American programmers is wrong. How can anyone justify adding an American worker to the unemployment queue for the sake of a cheaper, more captive immigrant worker is beyond me. Nothing against the visa holder who are motivated to advance and excel in a profession they desire, but not while skilled Americans are shuffled out of jobs and/or forced to work for lower wages due to the addition of a contrived, more captive, more restricted IT worker poll.

      The gall of Americans to feel that our government owes us anything. This is going to be a karma burn, but I feel so heated about it, I'm willing to take the chance.

      Its called The Market Economy and Capitalism. The whole US economy is built around the presumption that if you can increase supply by lowering costs then do it. All that matters is the profit at the end of the day, and American Workers are Human Capital.

      Capital should under all economic doctrines be replaced by capital that is cheaper and can work more efficiently.

      This is exactly what the H1B workers do for the US economy, so as far as the government is concerned (especially our current administration) this is a fantastic thing.

      This isn't how I personally feel (guess I'm not so right winged) but its how most business people feel that I have met over the last year or so.

      --
      `find / -name "*your_base*" -exec chown us:us {} \;`
    2. Re:What is dismaying... by javabandit · · Score: 1

      Its called The Market Economy and Capitalism. The whole US economy is built around the presumption that if you can increase supply by lowering costs then do it.

      That is apples to oranges. What you are saying works in a closed system. And the system we are talking about isn't closed. The American job market being flooded with workers from other countries and from other economies.

      Capital should under all economic doctrines be replaced by capital that is cheaper and can work more efficiently.

      Very simplistic. But very wrong. Unless you favor slave labor and the total deregulation of the entire job industry.

      In ANY system, a disruption within it will cause certain effects, some positive and some negative. The only question is HOW BIG is the disruption. The non-regulated inclusion of thousands upon thousands of H1B workers who are willing to work for slave wages (at least for techies) has seriously disrupted the economy.

      This is exactly what the H1B workers do for the US economy, so as far as the government is concerned (especially our current administration) this is a fantastic thing.

      No. The government would MUCH prefer that a programmer who is worth $80,000 a year... actually MAKE $80,000 a year. Because that means more taxes. What we've ended up with is a worker base that makes less money. That means less tax revenue. That means the government ISN'T happy.

      Most states are having severe budget deficits because the tax (income and sales) collections were VERY adversely affected by all the unemployment. Especially in the big tech states.

      This isn't how I personally feel (guess I'm not so right winged) but its how most business people feel that I have met over the last year or so.

      These "business people" only hold these views until their own market is suffering the same thing. I used to hear "business people" who ran call centers say these things. Until lots of call centers went to India.

      Now they think much differently.

    3. Re:What is dismaying... by ProudVeteran · · Score: 1

      Cut the karma bull. It wasn't karma that saved my life when I was defending this country in the rice paddies of Vietnam. It wasn't karma that saved my father from kazakami bombers when he proudly defended our country during WWII. IT WAS GOD ALMIGHTY, YOU HEATHEN!! Will H-1B workers have to risk their lives in Iraq? What about their sons and daughters??!! It's time for Americans to take back America. Darn, I'm glad I still have my M-16!!

    4. Re:What is dismaying... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      >This is exactly what the H1B workers do for
      >the US economy, so as far as the government is
      >concerned (especially our current
      >administration) this is a fantastic thing.

      No. The government would MUCH prefer that a programmer who is worth $80,000 a year... actually MAKE $80,000 a year. Because that means more taxes. What we've ended up with is a worker base that makes less money. That means less tax revenue. That means the government ISN'T happy.


      Wrong. Perhaps liberals, who want more tax money to spend, would think this way, but the current administration doesn't. Look at it from their point of view:

      A) Companies use cheap H1Bs. Result 1: higher short-term profits for the companies. For a Republican, this is good because their a big shareholder in the company, so they can make money here. Result 2: less tax revenue. Republicans want to downsize government anyway (except for defense), and regardless of what they'd like to spend taxpayer money on, #1 is still a higher priority.

      B) Companies pay higher wages. Result 1: lower short-term profits. For Republicans, who are shareholders in these companies, this is a bad thing. Result 2: companies pay less in bribes. A bad thing for any politician.

      So obviously it's in our administration's interest to push for situation A.

    5. Re:What is dismaying... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The gall of Americans to feel that our government owes us anything.

      We have paid that government dearly in tax money, and some of us have paid with our lives. The government damn well owes us something.

    6. Re:What is dismaying... by ProudVeteran · · Score: 1
      Gosh, I hope your programming logic isn't as faulty as your economic logic.

      A) Companies use cheap H1Bs. Result 1: higher short-term profits for the companies. For a Republican, this is good because their a big shareholder in the company, so they can make money here. Result 2: less tax revenue. Republicans want to downsize government anyway (except for defense), and regardless of what they'd like to spend taxpayer money on, #1 is still a higher priority.

      Here you are completely off topic. We are talking about tax revenue - not personal income. Please remember that most of our tax revenue comes from payroll tax - not from capital gains tax. And, most Republicans are not greedy enough to want to downsize government to the point where no payroll tax revenue is necessary.

      In case you hadn't noticed, both our federal and state budgets are now running deficits.

      B) Companies pay higher wages. Result 1: lower short-term profits. For Republicans, who are shareholders in these companies, this is a bad thing. Result 2: companies pay less in bribes. A bad thing for any politician.

      Once again, please don't avoid the topic of tax revenue. Higher wages result in additional payroll tax revenue. Period. Your ignorance of payroll taxes is making me wonder whether you are even paying payroll taxes here. Could you be one of those slickster H-1Bs who is living here on a tax-free expense per diem? Have you ever seen a W2?

      At least you are correct when you refer to campaign contributions from corporations as "bribes". Quite a liberal slip for a fellow trying to pander to conservative Republicans.

      Yes, the self-absorbed Republicans always prefer profits over the well being of their fellow citizens - not unlike upper-caste Hindus. Thankfully not all Republicans are self-absorbed. But, the tax problems are about to implode on us. We now have deficits at every level - federal, state, county, and city. This is something that no politician in America can ignore.

    7. Re:What is dismaying... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      My logic isn't faulty at all, but you're missing the entire point. This is not about tax revenue at all; it's about personal income for those in power. If they can make more money by pandering to big corporations, then they don't really care about the lack of payroll taxes and the resulting deficits. Why do you think they're so buddy-buddy with the big corps? Because they think they're good for the country? No, it's because they're personally getting rich through their assocation with them.

      You should be careful not to let your anger and hatred cloud your view of others. I can't imagine what made you think I was an H1B from my post; it should have been obvious that it was a complete slam against the rich politicians in power showing how they'd sell out the people they serve so they can become richer.

  208. RIIGHT by melted · · Score: 1

    You'd rather see these jobs migrate to India or Russia, right? Not those highly skilled Hindus and Russians migrate to the US and bring down ridiculously overinflated salaries of .com workers. It is for some reason impossible to reduce the salary for a worker in the US. During the dot-com era, you had to pay your workers real well, especially in California, to keep them. If you couldn't or didn't want to, you had to lower your hiring standards and hire morons. Guess what folks, those days are over and forgotten. I think Sun just can't pay $120K+ salaries anymore. They can't also tell their workers "starting with the next paycheck you'll get $85K", so they just fire them and hire cream of the crop from India for some reasonable salaries. I personally met some unbelievably bright Indian developers, so it's not like everyone is a cheap moron over there.

    If you'd rather see these jobs migrate to India, write your senator NOW. But when there are no jobs left here, let me tell you, you won't like it in India.

  209. Re:Replace the H1-B program with the B1-B... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    ..flying over their countries with a full bomb load!

    Pakistan might just do that for us. They and India are both growling at each other right now.

  210. What proverbial camel's back? by gorbachev · · Score: 1

    That's right, sue to keep your job. That's a
    sure way to success.

    There is no issue here. An ambulance chaser
    is suing Big Corp America, because a crybaby
    hurt his feelings.

    Get a new job and stop whining.

    Proletariat of the world, unite to kill stupidity

    --
    In Soviet Russia, I ruled you
  211. oh no, not again by minard · · Score: 2, Interesting
    As an H1-B holder, the ignorance and unashamed racism that typifies these discussions irritates the hell out of me.

    Why does anybody think that stopping immigration of engineers would protect American jobs? I have seen several posts here talk about immigration and outsourcing to other countries as if they are the same thing. They are not.

    Immigration keeps the jobs in the US, which ultimately is good for the US engineering industry. Outsourcing overseas sends the jobs elsewhere, which long term is very bad for the US engineering industry.

    If the H1-B program was cancelled and not replaced with something else (killing off employment related immigration, since this is the only mechanism there is) what do you think would happen?

    Despite all of the screams about record unemployment, EE unemployment really isn't that high. I know, of course, that for any individual there are only two levels of unemployment: there's 0%, which means you have a job, and 100%, which means that you don't. But the current level of EE unemployment is still sufficiently low that most companies struggle to find the right people. Today, both Europe and China outstrip the US in terms of EE graduate and PhD production rates. If US engineering companies were restricted any more in who they could employ in (and bring to, if necessary) the US, their reaction will not be to hire more US engineers. It will be to move whatever centers they need somewhere else. If you really think that "restricting the supply of engineers" (in the words of the IEEE-USA) will make for a stronger US engineering industry and greater levels of employment for US engineers, you are truly deluded.

    1. Re:oh no, not again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Immigration keeps the jobs in the US, which ultimately is good for the US engineering industry. Outsourcing overseas sends the jobs elsewhere, which long term is very bad for the US engineering industry. If the H1-B program was cancelled and not replaced with something else (killing off employment related immigration, since this is the only mechanism there is) what do you think would happen?

      There is a bit of a premium for managers to actually see "butts in chairs" instead of via phone and email.

      Despite all of the screams about record unemployment, EE unemployment really isn't that high.

      I don't know about EE, but software development jobs are dead dead dead.

      and unashamed racism

      Racism? I hate all H-1B's equally.

    2. Re:oh no, not again by minard · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Immigration keeps the jobs in the US, which ultimately is good for the US engineering industry. Outsourcing overseas sends the jobs elsewhere, which long term is very bad for the US engineering industry. If the H1-B program was cancelled and not replaced with something else (killing off employment related immigration, since this is the only mechanism there is) what do you think would happen?

      There is a bit of a premium for managers to actually see "butts in chairs" instead of via phone and email.

      Apparently - otherwise all the jobs would have been outsourced to cheaper locations. But what happens when you take away all the options?

      Despite all of the screams about record unemployment, EE unemployment really isn't that high.

      I don't know about EE, but software development jobs are dead dead dead.

      I can only talk with any certainty about my own field - but this doesn't really address the point. What is the percentage unemployment rate?

      and unashamed racism

      Racism? I hate all H-1B's equally.

      That's very nice of you, friend. But you didn't really answer any of my points. Just try this one: if H1-Bs went away, do you think the US engineering industry would get stronger or weaker?

    3. Re:oh no, not again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Despite all of the screams about record unemployment, EE unemployment really isn't that high.

      Bullshit.

      560,000 technical jobs have been lost in the last three years. Oh, and before you pull the pussy-ass "eh, what's your source" shit, that's the Bureau of Labor Statistics talking.

      Not bad, huh? Pretty efficient way to fuck over a half million careers. I wonder how many kids are missing out on new shoes, meals, doctor's appointments and school supplies because of that? What do you think? Oh, and this is AFTER their parents tried to build a home with a good job as its foundation. There are no good jobs anymore. It's all a fucking scam.

      I know, of course, that for any individual there are only two levels of unemployment: there's 0%, which means you have a job, and 100%, which means that you don't.

      But you don't fucking care.

      But the current level of EE unemployment is still sufficiently low that most companies struggle to find the right people.

      Horseshit. Companies struggle to find the most demoralizing way to FUCK CANDIDATES UP THE ASS during the interview process and then THROW THEIR ASS out in the street. The only thing missing is the jeering and gesturing from the window as the rejected candidate crawls towards the bus stop.

      Fake ads. Lying fuck managers. Bullshit HR people. Half-assed recruiters. Cheating interviewers. It's all a giant fucking rigged wet sticky shithole.

      The job market is irretrievably fucked. Whether smug assholes like you believe it or not is irrelevant.

      Besides, what's the fucking POINT of getting a job? There are two chances of keeping it for a whole pay period: shit and submerged in shit.

    4. Re:oh no, not again by minard · · Score: 1
      hmmm. I'm sensing some anger here...

      Nobody doubts that the tech jobs market has declined since 2001. The question is, was 2001 an aberration or is today?

      But back to the point - blaming all of the woes of the industry on "H1-Bs taking our jobs" is BS. This assumes that there is somehow a fixed pool of jobs to be distributed around a variable number of people. Just not true. If you screw down the availability of engineers to get some short term relier from declining engineering jobs, you can count on engineering jobs in the US continuing to decline as the center of gravity moves elsewhere.

  212. H1Bs can go CHOKE on a COW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    H1Bs can go CHOKE on a COW

  213. Pure BS (from where I stand) by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have read 100 posts that say that these guys are being paid akin to McDonalds help to program complex systems. At least from where I stand all the H1B's in this part of the Country do just as good as the next guy. (They drive cars and live in Houses/Apartments that no fast food jocky would be able to afford.) I have hired over 40 contractors over the last 4 years (about 1/2 H1B) -- and I can say that price was never a deciding factor....(wages were all pretty much the same -- maybe a dollar or two either way)....The biggest factor I have noticed is that in India they are generally better educated and their schools seem to have more of a focus on quality learning. And you can bet your ass at the age me and you were chasing tails and drinking brew in high school and college -- these guys were studying by candle light to come over here and take your job.

    --
    (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
  214. House Calls by luzrek · · Score: 1
    Plumbers and Electritians on an emergency basis are _very_ expensive. Mostly because they know you _have_ to get the repair done (I like my toilet). Kinda like a Locksmith can get a big tip f a chastity belt gets stuck. Unfortunately, corporations are pretty good at planning ahead so you rarely get emergancy work as a programer.

    With regards to obsolesence, I'ld bet that in the early days of plumbing and electricity the pace of change was equivalent to programming as it came into its own. I think that the rate of change in programming tools (languages included) is slowing down and becoming more standardized. Programming is going through a similar change as the toolset becomes more standardized and "visual" tools become more common.

    If you really want to make the big-bucks, go into a profession where licenses are mandatory for doing your job. Examples are actuary, doctor, and lawyer.

    --

    Galium Arsenide is the material of the future, and always will be.

  215. How About the jobs being created? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the majority here seem to believe that there is an upper limit to the number of jobs available and that if jobs are 'lost' to another country or people there is nothing left for Americans to do.
    The fact is that the creation of jobs is a continuous process as technology progresses limited only by the creativity of people. If you believe in the creativity of Americans then you do not have to worry about 'losing jobs' to outsiders although there is going to be some pain in the short term.
    Let me also point out that Indians who came in on H1B have later created thousands of jobs here in the US both directly by building great companies and by using their wealth to consume american products. Some famous examples are:
    - Vinod Khosla who is behind Sun, Google, and many other companies.
    - Sabeer Bhatia of Hotmail
    - Sanjiv Sidhu of I2
    - Vinod Gupta of InfoUSA
    - and many many more.

    Then there thousands of Indians who have quietly produced miracles while working for giant corporations and the professors and scientists who continue to make critical contributions at the universities.

    The US may be now the richest, most powerful country in the world but that never lasts for ever. Closing our borders to the outside world will only bring about the end of the US reign much sooner. In fact according to Chairman Greenspan, the best thing for the US economy is more immigration.I feel that while at the top it is in our best interest leave a legacy of a more open world.

  216. Facts about H1B and Unionized Labor by lgordon · · Score: 1

    The fact is that increased H1B's were lobbied to congress because of the threat of unionized engineers. The Boeing engineer strike of the early 90's was the trigger. The executives and VC's in Silicon Valley saw the handwriting on the wall, and decided to become "politically active."

    BTW, I have worked for a company where we had 3 H1B visa workers who represented a skillset (computer vision and AI) that was not available in the market. They were paid the prevailing wage (close to 6 figures at the time). They were sponsored by the company, however, and not some outsource body shop. They were from China and Italy.

  217. People doing nothing??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe the average USian is doing more than nothing...

    Reuters
    Productivity Up, Job Scene Looking Bleak
    Thursday March 6, 4:55 pm ET
    By Joanne Morrison

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. worker productivity rose last year at the fastest clip since 1950 as wary businesses extracted more from their workforces -- a trend that has lingered as lines for jobless benefits lengthened last week, government reports showed on Thursday...

    http://biz.yahoo.com/rb/030306/economy_11.html

  218. ummm sorry but... by No.+24601 · · Score: 1
    He's racist and ignorant.. you're just ignorant.

    let me explain:
    First of all where you have neatly included a placeholder, he didn't complete the sentence with the name of a nation, he actually named a religious group: Hindus.. or more precisely Hinduism. That is the ignorance part of it. The racist part of it is that he remarked that this sixpack of Hindus don't give a shit about their work.. this is a prejudice remark applied to a group of people... in other words, it's racist!

    What you're claiming is just plain ignorance because it appears you think Hindus describe all the people of India. sorry buddy, but there's also non-Hindus (Muslims, Catholics, atheists, etc.) living in India.

    So, yes I would cry foul if he said "sixpack of some other primarily white nation"... and yes, HE is racist.

    1. Re:ummm sorry but... by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 0, Troll

      Hi. Please shut the hell up.

      The "Hindu Race" doesn't need you as its spokesman, you jackass.

      --
      Bowie J. Poag

  219. Truth about H1-B ( Now and Then) by halfman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have been in H1-B for the past 6 years , There are some gross misconceptions about the H1-B workers .Here are some facts 9 out of 10 Tech companies reject workers who are not either citizens or Green Card holders H1-B workers coming to united states for the first time(visit) have been reduced drastically, I have not seen anyone to come on H1-B for the first time to the US over the past 2 years.Many of the H1-B workers who are here are in fact the best and the most experienced and have been here in for quite sometime. It is extremely diffcult to do green card process for H1-B workers. Many Big corporations have stopped doing Green Card process for H1-B workers. Foreign students who are in american univerisities do not get jobs easily .So there is not a lot of H1-B workers coming out of colleges. A H1-B worker cannot stay more than 6 years in the united states unless his company initiates the Green Card process. American companies are outsourcing in a big way so in due course of time H1-B will be a relic as there won't be a need to bring foreign workers into United States ..

  220. Re:In short - tsarkon reports sun haters are lame by softwaregeeks · · Score: 1

    You are an idiot!

  221. Our government WORKS FOR US! by cryofan2 · · Score: 1

    Our govt is our *servant*, our *employee*. We, the American citizens, OWN this country, and everything in it. We HIRED the govt to do OUR bidding.

    Just as if I own a store, and hire a manager, then that manager had DAMN well better work to benefit me, the owner, and not someone else, like someone from INDIA. It doesn't matter if I, the owner, am lazy. I OWN the damn business! If I want to be lazy, that is MY prerogative.

    Not to put too fine a point on it, but we American citizens made this country a place where there are jobs available, and if our elected official and/or civil servants give away those opportunities and jobs to non-citizens, then we need to fire them and put them in jail--or worse.

    The govt and the civil service workers and the elected officials owe me and you fair value in return for what we pay them in salaries and benefits. And they had damn well be getting me every opportunity available.

    And if they are selling out the American workers, they try them for treason and hang their asses!

    1. Re:Our government WORKS FOR US! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Not to put too fine a point on it, but we American citizens made this country a place where there are jobs available,


      No, you didn't. You probably did fuck all. Maybe your grandparents did something useful with their lives, but you seem to be just some kind of whiner.

      and if our elected official and/or civil servants give away those opportunities and jobs to non-citizens,

      Who clearly don't pay taxes, don't spend money in America, and don't have any kind of stake in its future. What an enlightened opinion...

  222. Think larger.. by varp · · Score: 1


    For all those people who are getting pissed about the meager trickle of H1-Bs coming into the country and "stealing" jobs, please pick up *ANY* product from *ANY* supermarket/store in the country and check the "Made in" label. Please feel free to use all your fingers on your hand to count the objects made in the US.

    Think about how many of those jobs should be brought back here.

  223. Quoted out of context by FreekyGeek · · Score: 2, Informative

    There is an inaccuracy in that Boston Globe article.

    In the article, the author stated that Sun's cofounder, Vinod Khosla, said on 60 Minutes "that at Sun, people from India 'are favored over almost anybody else'." This quote has been taken out of context. The 60 Minutes piece in question was a report on a very prestigious technical college in India, the Indian equivalent of MIT. When Mr. Khosla said certain people were favored, he was referring specifically to graduates of that university, not to Indian people in general. If you read the transcript you will see this. His statement was no different than saying Harvard Law School graduates are favored at law firms.

    It's a small but important point.

  224. Re:Why haven't they? Because the culture is broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    They haven't because the Indian Hindu culture is, in some ways, one of the most disfunctional in the world. When a U.S. company hires a Hindu worker, it usually gets someone who accepts the caste system, for example. The worker generally has a long history of accepting things the way they are and overlooking even major defects. (I spelled the word "disfunctional" because I don't like the original spelling.)


    I really, am opposed to the view that, Americans are under informed about other cultures and countries, but, I got to say, some people are too stupid to appreciate other cultures!
    A Hindu.

  225. Think larger.. by varp · · Score: 1

    For all those people who are getting pissed about the meager trickle of H1-Bs coming into the country and "stealing" jobs, please pick up *ANY* product from *ANY* supermarket/store in the country and check the "Made in" label. Please feel free to use all your fingers on your hand to count the objects made in the US.

    Think about how many of those jobs should be brought back here.

  226. And to make sure they find no qualified US workers by Colonel+Panic · · Score: 1

    I'd argue that the H1 program should just be *enforced*. H1Bs, as written in law, *require* the visa holder to be paid prevailing wages, and *require* something called 'Labor Certification', which supposedly proves that there are no available native workers in the local market who can perform those functions.

    Well that sounds just lovely on paper... but how do you think companies go about making sure that there are no native workers available in the local market who can perform the job? They make a very specific job posting where they specify the requirements in such a way that no one (or perhaps only the H1B they have in mind) has the right mix of qualifications, for examples see the recent article Take This Tech Job and Shove it in Salon.

  227. Classic Claim of Age Discrimination by magellan · · Score: 1

    The plaintif sounds similar to many displaced middle aged people. When times are tough, the middle aged, who are better paid, claim they are laid off in favor of the young.

    I doubt the national origin of the workers had anything to do with this. It is just a convenient screen.

    1. Re:Classic Claim of Age Discrimination by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      The plaintif sounds similar to many displaced middle aged people. When times are tough, the middle aged, who are better paid, claim they are laid off in favor of the young.

      There is a difference - age discrimination is illegal in the US, and fairly easy to prove and win a case on in the case of layoffs.

  228. Re:Why haven't they? Because the culture is broken by version5 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's a pretty tenuous argument. With just a little thought, I could come up with a reason why living in and accepting the allegedly dysfunctional Hindu caste system may in fact help programmers. It goes something like this:

    People living under the Hindu caste system have to work around a dysfunctional and sometimes arbitrary set of rules and structures that they are unable to remove without drastic consequences. This greatly resembles the Win32 API(or C++ or Java or whatever), and as such, in order to get around the limitations and stupidity of a language/programming construct, it is beneficial to be practiced at getting around the limitations and stupidity of social constructs.

    In short, I see no compelling evidence for your point of view (or mine for that matter.) Its all just idle speculation with no basis in fact. If you can offer me actual evidence supporting your claim, then we can talk, but to me, this is mostly I-Really-Wish-It-Was-True reasoning.

    --

    "It's Dot Com!"

  229. Boycott Sun by linuxisit · · Score: 1

    Sure appears to me that Sun is doing something
    it shouldn't. These H1-B workers come from
    countries where making any salary offered here
    would be a huge step up by comparison. I believe
    that companies operating in the USA should hire
    American workers. Period. I'm sure plenty of
    folks out there will argue this, but thats my
    opinion, and being in a position to influence
    purchases, I will do my best to steer purchases
    away from Sun! If you are of a like mind, then
    do the same. If you are of a different mind,
    take your argument somewhere else, as it will fall
    on my deaf ears...

  230. Workers from India..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    put the DOT in DOTcom.

  231. Re:And to make sure they find no qualified US work by MightyTribble · · Score: 1

    Again; enforcement.

    The government should *require* more proof of unsuccessful local recruiting. At the moment, they just require a copy of the advert, and proof that it ran for five days or so in a local paper, and a note saying "...and no-one suitable applied".

    While it would be wrong to have a government employee second-guessing an HR department, they could at least require that the jobs adverts be written and listed the same way as other, similar job adverts. Also require maybe the resumes of everyone who applied for the job, but didn't get it, along with a note from HR about why they were unsuitable. It's pretty obvious, looking through the wanted ads, to spot those written for a specific visa application.

    It may not stop small-company abuse, but it would certainly but a damper on large companies abusing the system, as the local INS office would be wading through *thousands* of US citizen resumes, all for jobs with the same company, that apparently don't match a particular job position. Makes it a bit harder to claim that there's no-one out there for it.

    But anyway, my point stands. If they just enforced the laws, it wouldn't be so bad. :)

  232. I want to talk about your hard on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been so poor that if I didn't wake up with a hard-on, I had nothing to play with all day.

    Aren't you able to get an erection other than by chance? You may be impotent. If you consult your doctor you may be able to get Viagra that will remedy this problem.

    Yours,

    John Thomas MD

  233. Re:Why haven't they? Because the culture is broken by composer777 · · Score: 1

    That's great and everything, but Phd's were more expensive than their counterparts, not less. Thus, there was an incentive to fire them.

    There is very little incenctive to fire an employee that you only have to pay ten cents on the dollar to keep. American workers would have to be ten times as productive, and I'm sorry, but even if we do buy into you somewhat elitist interpretation of 3rd world worker productivity, I have seen from my own experience that most Indian workers are just as good as American workers at churning out code. Maybe you are right and perhaps on AVERAGE they aren't as productive as American workes, but they would have to quite a bit less producive to encourage businesses to move industries back here.

    I think the problem is that you are looking for the wrong solution to this problem. We live in a democracy, and democracy comes first. If our economic system is causing gross distortions and a huge separation between the haves and have nots, the solution isn't to pray for the market to correct itself. The solution is to address the government to fix these grievances. And, if our economic system proves to have huge flaws, which I believe that it does, then the ultimate solution is to create a new one, or heavily regulate it. Capitalism is not some natural phenomena, it's an artificial system, and flooding the labor market with more employees has predictable results. We have to ask ourselves if this the result we want.

  234. Camel? by rbuysse · · Score: 1

    Don't you mean Tiger?

    --
    An infinite number of monkeys at an infinite number of typewriters still wouldn't repost stories on /.
  235. Re:In short - tsarkon reports sun haters are lame by RabidOverYou · · Score: 1

    > mediocritomaton

    Hey, watch your mouth!

  236. Re:H1-B isnt such a great deal for the Indians eit by imadork · · Score: 1
    After world war II, there was a big grassroots movement to buy only American made cars and such. I'd like to see it taken one step further and only buy software, hardware, or services from tech companies that replace thousands of american workers with cheap exploitable foreign labor.

    I agree. We should start by replacing the software written by that Finnish kid (Aren't they all a bunch of Socialists in Finland anyway?) with the software from the company founded by that All-American Harvard dropout!

  237. Re: fun ride by Maxwell · · Score: 1

    It's already started in Thailand, and the phillipines. It's not the US dollare vs the Rupee, it's the US dollar vs the world. And when your standard of livng goes up - you'll lose.

    As you are to the US, other will be to you. Count on it.

    JON

  238. Legal to move abroad but not to employ foreigners by PurpleWizard · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It all strikes me as silly

    Is it legal for them to close down a division or department and move it overseas or just lay off people and contract the work overseas?

    But it isn't legal to do something effectively equivalent that means some of the cash stays in the country.

    irony I said and Rony said "Hi" back

  239. Power of the US dollar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know for a fact that Eastman Kodak is attempting right at this very moment outsource ALL of its IT resouces to India. They are doing this because the Indian programmer only costs 40% of what the American programmer costs, plain and simple. My wife has been dodging layoffs now for over two years and the future doesn't look too hopeful for her. Kodak calls these Indian workers "Code Cutters". Not only are they outsourcing their programmers, but also system admins, network people, and their e-mail support (Lotus Notes) helpdesk has already been moved there. The truth is, today's American companies are ruled by greed. The only reason this is happening now is because we now posess the technology that makes outsourcing possible.

  240. H1B for domestic employees by An+dochasac · · Score: 4, Interesting

    H1B if enforced is actually a very good law. But we also need something which gives U.S. employees the same flexibility that H1B gives their employers. That is, if my job is exported overseas, I should have the right to follow that job and have a work visa in the target nation. Nations which export employees to the U.S. should be willing to import employees. The idea exchange which would take place would be benificial to all. You might think Americans wouldn't work in "sweatshop conditions", but working conditions can actually be better overseas. Ask a French employee how much vacation they get or how much notification is required before a layoff. The answer would make most Americans cry. Gross pay is the only benefit where American companies can compete globally, and then only companies in large U.S. cities. Vacation, flexibility, family friendliness, telecommuting and other worker right issues are better in almost every other first and second world nation. True capitalism would allow workers to flow to where they receive the best benefits to match their needs.

    1. Re:H1B for domestic employees by minard · · Score: 1

      why would any other nation want to help out with regulations? Do you actually think that any nation likes "exporting" its best talent to the US?

    2. Re:H1B for domestic employees by macker · · Score: 1

      I'll buy the idea that most other nations,
      especially India, Pakistan, South Africa, Nigeria, et. al., are delighted to "import" substantial amounts of hard currency, and build up an information technology infrastructure.

      And the talent isn't 'exported' permanently, for the most part: once they've milked the H1B workers for lots of high-productivity code at below-market prices ( which the suits can easily due, because of the 'captive audience' factor ), they can just squeeze down the wages and cut benefits until the 'guest workers' throw in the towel and go home. Then, just sign off on another 'scare skill-set' waiver, and bring in a fresh batch of wannabes. A double disgrace and a shame, that exploits and demeans both domestic and foreign employees.

      --
      (T)he (O)ld (M)an
    3. Re:H1B for domestic employees by minard · · Score: 1
      what you describe here doesn't match my experience. Not in the least.

      I know of nobody on an H1-B who gets "squeezed" until they "go home". There is a significant cost to get somebody here on an H1-B, and no employer I can think of would do that except to hire good talent - and remember that H1-Bs are very easily transferable. The "captive audience" feature is largely a myth.

    4. Re:H1B for domestic employees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of the IT big outsourcing compaines in Inida will hire qualified Americans to help them take more business away. Right now most of the compaines are at their limits. All the best talent has moved to the US with H1B and L1 visas and they hired all the rest for their programs there. Now every new person they add to a project is lower quality than the ones on it.

    5. Re:H1B for domestic employees by An+dochasac · · Score: 1

      There was an captive employee factor and some companies (illegally) abused this to underpay H1B's and treat them as indentured servents but recent changes in the law made these visas transferable and negated this factor.

  241. We must think more highly of our profession by gammoth · · Score: 1

    Beyond the H1-B fiasco and the spineless Congress that won't stand up to the big (fat lying) corps, I'm very concerned at our lack of esteem of our own profession. Programming is difficult, highly specialized, and best done by intelligent, talented people.

    We best start thinking this way or we will lose the profession we've come to enjoy so much. We are members of a profession, we are highly trained, we are in demand.

    We work in the tradition of Turing and von Neumann. We should be proud.

  242. ethical parity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so does this mean everyone's going to stop buying cheap foreign electronics and cheap foreign sneakers and shirts and.... ... oh, I guess it's too late. Hurts when it's finally you, doesn't it?

    1. Re:ethical parity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a good point. The real truth
      in your statement though is, "... I
      guess its too late.". I'm afraid it
      really is. The America I grew up in
      is basically gone. Probably won't
      ever come back.

    2. Re:ethical parity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let their own people sue in their own country! Why the fuck are Americans responsible for the bad social behavior of, say, a Japanese company? This is a case of Americans handling an American company. If other countries did the same then the scenario you describe would not exist!

  243. Re:Why haven't they? Because the culture is broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, the reason that hiring PhD's became "fashionable" in the early 1970's is because there were a lot of them. Due to unemployment and hiding from the Vietnam War, more people stayed in school longer. Since there wasn't as much incremental demand for academics when these folks graduated, they naturally went to industry.

  244. What a stupid, redundant argument by Loundry · · Score: 1

    it's about corporate greed

    Let's take a look at the definition of the operative word in your argument, greed:

    "excessive or reprehensible acquisitiveness"

    Well, that just begs the questions: What is "excessive"? What is "reprehensible?" Guess what? They are both completely subjective concepts. Ask 1,000 people what exactly is "greed" and you'll get 1,000 different answers.

    --
    I don't make the rules. I just make fun of them.
  245. No one has thought this through yet. by Featureless · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That in itself is a bit frightening.

    Allow me to take the point of view of pure self-interest for the moment.

    If we want to try to stave off the end of the domestic technology industry in the United States, we need to eliminate H1B's, open our borders, and offer immediate, permanent citizenship to skilled technology workers. No questions asked. Friendly service at the airport. Maybe even throw in some tax incentives. 50% off for the first year! Give us your rich, your skilled, your ambitious. We'll take them all.

    Follow along closely.

    If a programmer is going to compete with me from India, they are going to be able to charge 10-20% of what I charge and work remotely. This is a simple fact of the currency market and the cost of living. That is what's happening now. In addition, unlike cars or textiles, there is no way to tarrif the product as it crosses a border. Remote work in a foreign country has problems, but none serious enough to offset an 80% discount. Left unchecked, this will simply end the entire technology industry in the 1st world as we know it.

    H1B's exacerbate the problem, because they come with a time limit. They are basically a self-help industrial espionage program for every 3rd world country in the world. An H1B says, come to America. Make (let's be honest here) 80-90% of what a citizen makes. Mingle with America's best and brightest, and learn on the job. Then, in four years, take your newfound skills and experience back home, and go back to charging 10-20% of what Americans charge. Welcome to your home country's new middle class.

    H1B's have one purpose. To accelerate the destruction of our domestic technology industry. Just natural forces alone weren't quick enough for Microsoft, IBM and Sun. They needed to speed up the process, and H1B's were how they did it.

    If we opened our borders now while our quality of life is still high (at least in a few parts of the country), we could use it to brain-drain the 3rd world, to suck the talent out of where it can charge 10% to here, where it will charge 100%. If we did this 10 years ago, we might have staved off the current tech industry disaster - a disaster which at this point I believe is driven almost entirely from overseas outsourcing (understandably everyone is keeping numbers about this process quiet - so we're all speculating on this issue. Nonetheless, I'm very, very confident I'm going to be bourne out on this one as the figures come to light). Even if we did this tomorrow, we might see very gradual improvement in the tech job market here over the next 5-10 years. Long term, though, it's probably already too late to undo the damage.

    So make no mistake. H1B's are the most pernicious thing ever contrived against the American technology worker. Ironically, not many have grasped why.

    Now all that said, even as someone who is losing their livelihood (I am already headed back to school to change careers), I don't know if it matters. At the end of the day. I respect anyone who improves their lot through learning and hard work - individuals and nations. The economic game being played that makes it easy to exploit labor in the 3rd world is cynical and certainly contrived, but we are all relatively lucky to be allowed to play when you take it in the context of history. I feel a brotherhood with my colleagues in India and elsewhere, and I cannot help myself from being happy at their success. In the end it may all be for the best.

    1. Re:No one has thought this through yet. by MKalus · · Score: 1

      we could use it to brain-drain the 3rd world, to suck the talent out of where it can charge 10% to here, where it will charge 100%.

      I'll take it that this is why already a lot of countries are complaing about the brain drain that is happening towards the US.

      Let's face it. The Bright ones who can really propell the industry forward won't have a problem to land in the US (look at Linus Torvalds as an example) As such your point is pretty mute, countries like Canada complain about the brain drain to the US!

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
  246. This is about consolidation by composer777 · · Score: 1

    I agree with the last part. However, I think that you are saying that this is stopping with corporations, but it does not. It stops with the owners of corporations, and they know what they are doing. They aren't concerned that eventually this will slow the economy. The economy does not affect those with billions in the bank. As long as there are police to protect them and a desperate pool of labor, they will be fine. What it is about is consolidation. Consolidation is an effort to shift wealth away from the American population at all costs, and into the hands of the owners. Flooding the labor market while at the same time ignoring the already consolidated wealth and power that is acting through consolidated businesses such as Microsoft is creating an imalance in competion. So, we've increased the number of desperate workers, and are reducing the number of companies that are desperate(if there are any) to hire them. The result is predictable. There will be a leaching of wealth from the majority of the world population, and then that leaching will move into the corporations themselves, with the end-game being that a very, very small percentage will come away with the goods, while many will literally starve.

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=52446&thresh ol d=0&commentsort=0&tid=98&mode=thread&pid=5198618#5 201316

    Here are some other comments I have posted in the past, the text I am replying to is in italics:

    Firstly, what exactly are they supposed to do about it?

    That's the whole point, free trade makes it nearly impossible for governments to set a fair wage for it's workers. It effectively reduces worker's rights to zero. It gives all the power to corporations to shop for the cheapest labor, while keeping the barrier to market entry extremely high for businesses in 3rd world countries. So, the end result is that 3rd world countries are not enjoying the profits from this labor, since they aren't the ones that own the businesses.

    Secondly, how do you figure that it's $60,000 worth of work?

    How does a price for anything get set? It's a balancing act of supply and demand and competitive pressure. When there is no longer a balance, then certain things end up being grossly undervalued, while others are grossly over-valued. So, for example, with a huge amount of labor, and competition, wages are kept low, and are getting lower. However, on the top end, businesses are consolidating and are giving people less and less options. The end result is that the current system is creating an artificial imbalance, and yes, it is by design.

    I once met a fellow (suburban Chicago) who had a lawn cutting business and worked with VMS systems. The lawn cutting business during the season was earning him more money than the computer work. He had 8 or 9 trucks going out and cutting for him.

    It's important to dig deeper and ask why this is so. After all, computers and technology have far more money flowing in than lawn care, so doesn't it seem absurd to you that he is making more mowing lawns? You act as if it's a good thing. Where is all that money going? Can you answer that?

    Basicly what you are saying is exactly my point, even though it might not be obvious. I've been talking over and over about the devaluation of labor. And, you are backing my point up by showing that someone can make more money by owning their own lawn care business than by working in an industry that is awash in money. The reason is that the money in the tech industry is going to the owners? Why is it going to the owners? Not because they deserve, even if in some cases they do, but the reason it is going to the owner is because competition at the top is small, while at the bottom it is huge. Then there are barriers to entry in this market that are making it difficult for people to make the jump from employee to owner. The end result is a system which rewards those with power, while undervaluing labor. The way

  247. Re:H1-B isnt such a great deal for the Indians eit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you really should learn how to spell "you" before posting to Slashdot.

  248. This is not exactly true by friday2k · · Score: 1

    While I agree with your post it is not true that H1's cannot look for another job. An H1 Visa is transferable. The hiring company just has to go through the same paperwork and you are hired. You do not have to leave the country.

  249. If I may quote Neal Stephenson at lenght... by PlanetJIM · · Score: 1
    "When it gets down to it--talking trade balances here--once we've brain-drained all our technology to other countries, once things have evened out, they're making cars in Bolivia and microwave ovens in Tadzhikistan and selling them here, once our edge in natural resources has been made irrelevant by giant Hong Kong ships and dirigibles that can ship North Dakota all the way to New Zealand for a nickel, once the Invisible Hand has taken all those historical inequities and smeared them out into a broad global layer of what a Pakistani brickmaker would call prosperity--y'know what? There's only four things we do better than anybody else: music/movies/microcode (software)/high-speed pizza delivery."
    This is what it feels like to do that spreading.
    --
    A Transmission From PlanetJIM.[end trans]
  250. Re:Why haven't they? Because the culture is broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you think people should appreciate the idea that some people are born superior to others? Since all us non-Hindus are therefore "untouchables" since we don't have a caste, does that mean we're supposed to "appreciate" that we're inferior to you?

    I have about as much appreciation for that type of culture as I have for the Nazi idea that non-Aryans are somehow born inferior to Aryans.

  251. Re:Why haven't they? Because the culture is broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that your use of the phrase "churning out code" says it all - I wouldn't buy your software.

  252. Not even close. by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Perhaps if I had hired them, or you had hired them, you might be on the right track.

    As it is though, no-one has HIRED them at all. Government was created by people long dead to us, and ever since then it has simply BEEN - after all, if they were our employees then we could close positions, right?

    So where's the option to vote no-one into office? The answer is, there isn't any - the office is there and we just get to choose who goes in there (among a pool that WE DID NOT PICK).

    If you really believe government "works for you" in any way you are operating under a dangerous illusion that is going to cause you problems at some point. If you simply think of them as a separate entity that subsists based on what we give them, then you at least are starting to understand the nature of the relationship you are in... frankly I even find it beneficial for the most part, I just don't believe they in any way "work for me". They do not. Their obligation to do anything for me ends (actually, it never existed) the moment they enter office. All that we can say after that point is that we voted for a person because of certain beliefs they expressed, basically like letting loose a pre-programmed robot built for politics that watch form afar but only have indirect control over. Government as "employees of the people" is a dangerously wrong metaphor.

    Now this part is choice:

    Not to put too fine a point on it, but we American citizens made this country a place where there are jobs available, and if our elected official and/or civil servants give away those opportunities and jobs to non-citizens, then we need to fire them and put them in jail--or worse.


    I am speechless. How did elected officials give away our jobs? They did not. Companies made THAT choice. The article in question was Sun allegedly (I'll make no statement on guilt or innocence here) cheaper H1-B workers. Here's the thing - they still have to live here. That means that they are making wages that people in the US could live on, because they are living on them. I'm assuming this is what you mean by "giving jobs away". If you're talking about shipping jobs overseas, that's a whole other matter and a case where the government doesn't enter into the picture at all. If wages lower here because of H1-B visas, then so be it!! I'll survive.

    If you don't like americans loosing jobs to H1-B visa people, then start your own company and don't hire them.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  253. Re:Why haven't they? Because the culture is broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's called the "invisible hand" theory, my friend and you REALLY need to read up on it.

    The LAST thing you want to do is introduce governmental control on a free market.

  254. Re:H1-B isnt such a great deal for the Indians eit by siliconeyes · · Score: 1

    Indians will let themselves be worked 60-70 hours a week for the same salary that the cute white little administrative assistant is getting (hell, probably less) because, well, it beats the alternative which is sitting in a pile of your own filth in India hoping to get a job that pays enough so you can eat.

    Dude, I don't have anything terribly insightful or interesting to say here, but what I'll definitely say is that reading such comments makes me feel ASHAMED to be part of a community like Slashdot.

    Yes, I am an Indian. No, I don't sit in a pile of my own filth (though I'm only middle class) and No, I don't plan on coming to your country. Couldn't imagine living with people like you.

  255. The first thing we should do ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is to outsource all the politicians.

    Apologies from Natasha Cohen to W.S.

  256. To quote Bulworth by IndependentVik · · Score: 1

    "Say it with me now: 'socialism'!"

    --
    I'd suggest you don't use Slashdot as your only news source, or you will suffer permanent brain damage.
  257. So in other words, you think communism is better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For there to be a disparity between the haves and the have-nots is hardly artificial. It is survival of the fittest.

  258. Looks like that hit a nerve ... by BillsPetMonkey · · Score: 0

    My goodness CNN have done a good job on America's unsuspecting.

    --
    "It's not your information. It's information about you" - John Ford, Vice President, Equifax
  259. Disparate Impact Discrimination by dolbywan_kenobi · · Score: 1

    IANAL yet, still have yet to pass the bar- Doh!
    This sounds almost like a classic disparate impact case. The case that first treated this issue was Griggs v. Duke Power Co.; in that case, the company instituted a high school degree requirement. This H1b case sounds strangely like it, except here the H1B visa holders are, if I am reading the facts correctly, exempted from a requirement that American workers are subject to. If nothing else, this might be discrimination against Americans, and it is not legal to discriminate on the basis of nationality, whether one is a foreign national or american worker.

    Griggs v. Duke Power Co http://www.hr-guide.com/data/G702.htm is an interesting case, chiefly in that it said that animus was not necessary in this type of case

  260. Serves them right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems that in my company, Indians can get away with this sort of thing because they are protected as a minority group, and no one dares to cite racism against a guy with brown skin. Minority group? Indians run the whole company, only promote and hire other Indians, and make it impossible for this minority white guy to break through, despite the awards and recognition I have received. My company must be 50% Indian and 25% Asian. I'm the minority here; I am the target of their racism.

    I'm all for affirmative action to correct the years of slavery and oppression imposed on the African-American race. But Indians do not need or deserve such preferential treatment, especially since they come from the top crust of their own caste system.

    1. Re:Serves them right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh you poor oppressed white racisit biggot pigshit. Where do I send the donations? I've just produced a hot steaming turd I'm sure will help your cause.

  261. The Camel's Back by Webmoth · · Score: 1

    I don't think this one will hold water.

    --
    Give me my freedom, and I'll take care of my own security, thank you.
  262. Australian and NZ (H1-B) programs? by ordinarius · · Score: 1

    I took a quick look at the Australian and NZ regulations. They both have a similar program but with an interesting twist. Because both countries have government sponsored insurance programs companies do not pay for your health insurance? In effect if you're on the equivalent of an H1-B in either of these countries you have to pay for your own, which is pretty much a non-starter.

    So a teacher or a nurse could come here to work (my wife's a nurse and we know of lots of Aussie and NZ nurses here in California). But she couldn't go work there? That doesn't seem quite fair. Am I reading the regulations wrong?

    Can anyone confirm how these programs work in other countries? Thanks.

    - ordinarius

    1. Re:Australian and NZ (H1-B) programs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least for NZ you are being a little paraniod.

      It's not so much "government sponsored insurance" as public health.

      If you get sick, you go to a doctor or hospital and get good free treatment. That's it. No-one is going to ask to see your passport. If the treatment is covered ( and pretty much everything except cosmetic surgery and the like is ), then you only pay some nominal fee, just like everyone else.

    2. Re:Australian and NZ (H1-B) programs? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I hate to change the topic, but it'd be nice to get a little positive information out of Slashdot for once....

      Does anyone here have any good information about emigration to some of these countries? Specifically, Australia, NZ, Germany, Switzerland, Austria, Czech Republic, Sweden, Norway, etc.? With the huge number of unemployed tech workers in the US, these countries would be smart to take advantage of the situation by importing these workers ("brain drain"). How hard is it to find tech jobs in these places? How hard is emigration? What are some places to look? I'm sure more than a few unemployed people here would be interested in moving to greener pastures right now.

  263. Angry *White* Guy? by obnoximoron · · Score: 1

    I know this is somewhat tangential to the issue being debated, but... I find it interesting that you define yourself according to your skin color. It is as if you are perceiving this conflict as between whites and browns rather than between employers and employees. Or maybe I am mistaken and you created this slashdot id long ago.. but my first sentence still holds true.

    I found your login id interesting because for example, *I* would never think of defining myself as a Light Brown Guy, angry or not. LOL. My skin color has no part in how I define my identity, nor does my ordained nationality.

    1. Re:Angry *White* Guy? by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 1

      Actually, the nick was a derivitive of the American Wire Gauge acronym. I was working on some electrical projects when I mentioned that I needed some 18 AWG. A friend who wasn't farmiliar with the standard said "AWG? Angry White Guys?". Being that I was white, and not in a happy mood, I got named "Angry White Guy". It just kind of stuck.
      And even though my skin color may not mean a whole lot to how I define my identity, it can mean a lot to how others have defined me. I'm certain that you've run into the same. As an aside, Light Brown Guy sounds like an unlikely superhero. I suggest you roll with it.

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
  264. BAAAAA BAAAAAA BAAAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can hardly wait until this smug little shit gets tromped on by globalization.

    1. Re:BAAAAA BAAAAAA BAAAA by Artful+Codger · · Score: 1

      Over 40 years and still waiting. I'm riding globalization, not being run over by it. Clients in Thailand, Japan, Singapore, Italy, and even Vermont.

      Lead, follow, or get outta the way.

      --

      ... plans that either come to naught, or half a page of scribbled lines...
  265. Student visas by ggwood · · Score: 1

    A large fraction (around half) of all Ph.D's in physics granted in America
    are to foreign nationals. They come on student visas. Afterwords, they
    take H1-B visas and get jobs here in America. Yes, they probably suffer all
    the abuses which have already been discussed: lower pay, working longer hours, far more dependance on a particular employer, etc.

    However, the alternative is to send them back to their home countries (where, in my limited experience, most do not want to go) with a PhD in physics.

    To get the nice, comfortable American way of life they saw (but sure as hell didn't have) while they were here, might they build their own governments weapons?

    Perhaps we should either make these students offers of citizenship (or perminant residency) or not accept them at all - but neither of these options is going to happen any time soon. H-1B is pretty much all we have (that or marrying Americans...not very likely, especially for the men, in Physics departments).

    I think the way these employees of Sun were treated is incredibly badly. Tossing out the entire H-1B system might also have problems.

    Just FYI.

    --
    a war on terrorism? How can we end a war on a method?
  266. Re:Why haven't they? Because the culture is broken by composer777 · · Score: 1

    Yes, and the invisible hand theory is wrong, at least in our current situation.

    Our current market has huge problems, with huge imbalances in competition.

  267. To H1-B or not to H1-B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I understand the national pride. And I agree with some of statements made that are pro-American.

    Personally, I'm on H-1B. To be honest, I pay Federal Taxes, Social Security (even though I'm a temp worker and don't have any intention of getting old here), I pay Medicare (even though I don't qualify to use it), I pay all my bills, make car payments and so on. Whatever's left is spent on the local goods. All my saving are for a rainy day (here).

    Occasionally, I spend $15 to get a foreign CD. And sometimes, I send $2000 to my sister so she can buy a ticket to come visit me here in the States. Once, in the last 7 years I sent $1000 to one of my Uncles who could really use that much. Most others I know buy houses and stick around. Pay property taxes and are happy.

    99% of my money is put right back into the American economy.

    However, I would like to say that the big corporations are not so greedy that they think so short-term. They wouldn't just love to make money but also to ensure that the money keeps coming in. They probably do their best to make sure the American economy still stays on top one way or another. Otherwise, they would all be out of business or at least fall behind some other economic power. Even if they make decisions that may seem rather un-partiotic (for lack of a better word), realize that their perspective and qualifications as CEOs and directors is much different from ours.

    Even if it becomes hard to hire foreign nationals as long as there are American workers, I think the situation will not change that much. If a teacher can live on $35K/yr so can you. If a foreign IT professional can, then so can you. Even if locals are hired, I doubt that jobs will going at the demanded rate, anymore. The times, they're a-changin'. The corporation would say, I have a job for $35K/yr. If you don't want it there's a nice Indian with his name on it. Whether you take it or not doesn't change the fact that your skills are worth the prevailing market rate regardless of the nationality of the workforce. This still leaves one with the dilemma of whether to get off their high horse and do with a smaller house or to teach the Jones' a lesson.

    Outsorcing to another country, would be much worse for the local economy. Since now, they no longer need to paid in terms of cost of living in the States but rather in their home town in some third world country. This money saved is not going to be philanthropically re-distributed among the compatriots. While eliminating jobs in the local market it will also eliminate the middle class.

    Those are my personal views with the utmost respect for the country that let me in and shows a great deal of hospitality. :)

  268. Typical Straw Man(response to title) by composer777 · · Score: 1

    The system is designed and created by men, and is therefore not natural. That is obvious. So, when a corporation get a huge governmetn bailout, it's "survival of the fittest", but when someone that is poor needs money to survive, they're on there own. The hypocricy is obvious and stunning. If you can't apply the same standards to yourself as you do to others, then you have no right to talk about right and wrong or good and evil.

    1. Re:Typical Straw Man(response to title) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you.. however, men (inclusive of women) are natural, therefore all that men create is natural. That markets are synonymized with not fully understood natural phenomenon, is a mistake in itself. I do not believe your argument hinges on this view. It should be viewed purely in the context of a democratic system of society.. what do the _people_ want? Do they want social security for companies and none for themselves?

      I know that you were replying to the previous person. A note to the previous person, and the multitudes that make the mistake, evolution is about survival of the *FIT* (NOT fittest) - in a complex of circumstance, it has also been stated many times that intra-species CO-OPERATION is as important as competition.

  269. Re:H1-B isnt such a great deal for the Indians eit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Yes, I am an Indian. No, I don't sit in a pile of my own filth (though I'm only middle class) and No, I don't plan on coming to your country. Couldn't imagine living with people like you.

    I am an American, and I live in the U.S. Those of us who are not dicks-- which really is quite a lot of us-- mostly live with people like this guy by ignoring them or mocking them mercilessly.

    Hope this helps.

  270. Re:H1-B isnt such a great deal for the Indians eit by rossz · · Score: 1

    That's why I would love to see a complete overhaul of the H1-B visa system. I'm not against immigrant works. The US is a great country because over the past 200 years we have taken in anyone willing to work hard and better themselves. Let's give them more incentive.

    1. Make H1-B visas transferable (not tied to a specific company) so workers can't get screwed by companies. Also, remove company sponsership of H1-B visas entirely.

    2. Make it easier to get to get permanent resident status for an H1-B work after a couple of years, which could lead to citizenship. I believe someone who's spent a few years working here has proven themselves.

    3. Tie the number of H1-B visas issued directly to the unemployment rate. The higher the unemployment rate the fewer the visas issued each year. Perhaps refine this by industry. However, no retraction of existing visas when the employment situation gets bad. Just a couple of years ago the tech industry bitched and moaned (and bribed) until the number of visas were increased drastically. No more of that. The unemployment tie-in must be ironclad.

    4. When issued an H1-B visa, the worker is given a temporary visa (3 months? 6 months?) to enter the country and find a job. Can't find one in the specified time? Tough shit. Go home. You may reapply for a new work visa in one year.

    5. If an H1-B worker finds himself unemployed (shit happens) due to layoffs, give him a decent amount of time to find a new job. I'm not such a bastard that I would kick someone out the day after their employer went bankrupt.

    I'm sure my suggestions could use some refinement. I'm also sure they would never be considered by our congress-critters.

    --
    -- Will program for bandwidth
  271. I agree by composer777 · · Score: 1

    You, wouldn't buy my code, and I don't care.

    "Gee, I can't think of anything to address his arguement, so instead I'll come up with a stupid ad-hominem attack, that'll show him!!"

    Boy, you sure taught me a lesson.

  272. You assume Sun makes a profit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... have you looked at their stock lately?

  273. Reverse Racism at it's finest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now, in the article it claims...

    (sun founder) Khosla was quoted as saying that at Sun, people from India ''are favored over almost anybody else.''

    Now, if some white guy ran a company and said white people were favored over everyone else, he would get crucified by the liberal media.

    The fact is the H1-B is being abused. There is no lack of qualified tech people in the US right now. I'm all for them bringing them in as long as they PAY them the same exact amount they would pay an american worker if not higher, plus pay some kind of tax on top of that (since customs has to deal with people coming over here). This would prevent the H1-B from being used in any case except a company not being able to find someone with that skill set in this country.

    It's a joke to say there aren't enough qualified tech people in the job pool and out of work now to hire from.

    If it was any other group getting their jobs taken away from them, there would be a huge uproar about it. But since IT workers are largely white males, we get to take it in the ass because if not we are labeled as "racist".

    It's a pathetic situation.

  274. taken out of context by yomoma · · Score: 1


    If you saw the show on 60 Minutes, you'd know that Vinod Khosla was talking about IIT grads (the whole segment was about IIT) since it is such a demanding program and has produced some great leaders at american companies. Not Indians in general.

  275. Ever heard of "capitalism?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't have a right to an exorbitant salary. Companies have a right to make a profit, and they have a right to make business decisions that maximize their wealth-creation potential. This is the basic tenet of capitalism, which is the socioeconomic backbone of our country. If you don't like it, you can pack up and move to Cuba or North Korea or another "worker's paradise" where overbearing governmental regulations can guarantee you a lifetime of mediocrity and conformity.

    If you (or any of the other pinkos complaining about H1Bs in this story) had real talent, you would be in demand. You wouldn't have any problem securing employment. Don't blame capitalism for your personal and professional shortcomings.

  276. Re:Why haven't they? Because the culture is broken by zackbar · · Score: 1

    MORE code isn't the same thing as BETTER code.

    I've only got anecdotal evidence, but I haven't seen any H1B people who had much skill. Many *thought* they did though.

    I currently sit near one hindu who is very intelligent, and doesn't require hand-holding. He's not an h1b though. But he spends less time providing actual solutions than overly complicating systems.

  277. Then grant them citizenship. by startled · · Score: 1

    The H1-B system is not about freedom. It's about giving employers another tool to exploit their employees.

    "Seriously though, if you want foreign workers to demand a higher pay, abolish H1B visas and other such bureaucracies. Give a green card to anyone who comes to work in America. This way, without the noose of H1 visa, foreign workers will also demand a higher pay as per free market dictates."

    I thought I entirely disagreed with your post, until I got all the way to the end of it. Opposition to H1-Bs is not hypocrisy. While it's inevitable that some people will want to be protectionist about our labor market (short-term self-interest is a very powerful motivator, after all), I think some of the opposition to the H1-B program is the abuse it allows.

    It's hazardous to tie someone's thinking about the H1-B situation to their overall opinions on freedom of immigration, because it's a bad system that artificially drives wages below their market value. How can even the most ardent free-immigration supporter agree with a system that enables exploitation of the immigrants at the same time as it decreases quality of life for citizens?

    So, yes-- H1-B is strictly inferior to granting a green card to the foreign worker for everyone except the employer, who of course is quite happy with the additional leverage over their employee.

  278. Re:H1-B isnt such a great deal for the Indians eit by synx · · Score: 1

    re: 30 days....

    Its actually 10 days. 10 days to get a new job and file for a H1B or leave the country. Not much time at all.

    Being a H1B is a form of indentured servitude. It's not pretty. H1Bs aren't subject to the same rights americans are - they are taxed by the US, but can't vote (taxation without representation, sound familiar?), they dont have freedom of speech (the ins can revoke your H1B without much fuss), and so on.

    Re: finding another job in 30 days - obviously you've never looked for a tech job lately - even if you are excellently qualified it can take significantly longer than 30 days just to land 1 interview, let alone get an offer that you take. Try to do that in 10 days - no way jose!

    In reference to H1Bs - most of us them have advanced degrees. To get a H1B job you basically have to have at minimum a Bachelors, and many others have Masters and even some PhDs. H1Bs aren't rubber stamped by some fly by night technical institute.

    just fyi.

  279. Worked at Sun - H1-B Rules need to be revisited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting


    * i worked at sun thru the 90s

    * i worked with one large team with many folks
    from india (i really enjoyed working with them)

    * i worked with a smaller team with the majority beging from india (another great group of folks)

    * i talked with folks from india, and many said they would like to change jobs but cannot because they must stayed employed by the same employer for 6 yrs to obtain a green card. this is where the things are not apples-to-apples. a citizen can change jobs and not have to consider the consequences the H1-B person does. they have to be very careful. what i observed is that there is less movement by H1-B people working at sun. i perceive this as a captive audience, and i percieve management being very aware of this situation

    * i dont think sun is breaking any laws from my experiences. the rules that are applied have undergone quite a challenge and require an extensive review and adjustment based on our economic conditions

    * sun has enough trouble trying to execute, this is the least of their problems

  280. It's about consolidation by composer777 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm posting this in a bit more prominent place because it needs to be read.

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=52446&thresh ol d=0&commentsort=0&tid=98&mode=thread&pid=5198618#5 201316

    Here are some other comments I have posted in the past, the text I am replying to is in italics:

    Firstly, what exactly are they supposed to do about it?

    That's the whole point, free trade makes it nearly impossible for governments to set a fair wage for it's workers. It effectively reduces worker's rights to zero. It gives all the power to corporations to shop for the cheapest labor, while keeping the barrier to market entry extremely high for businesses in 3rd world countries. So, the end result is that 3rd world countries are not enjoying the profits from this labor, since they aren't the ones that own the businesses.

    Secondly, how do you figure that it's $60,000 worth of work?

    How does a price for anything get set? It's a balancing act of supply and demand and competitive pressure. When there is no longer a balance, then certain things end up being grossly undervalued, while others are grossly over-valued. So, for example, with a huge amount of labor, and competition, wages are kept low, and are getting lower. However, on the top end, businesses are consolidating and are giving people less and less options. The end result is that the current system is creating an artificial imbalance, and yes, it is by design.

    I once met a fellow (suburban Chicago) who had a lawn cutting business and worked with VMS systems. The lawn cutting business during the season was earning him more money than the computer work. He had 8 or 9 trucks going out and cutting for him.

    It's important to dig deeper and ask why this is so. After all, computers and technology have far more money flowing in than lawn care, so doesn't it seem absurd to you that he is making more mowing lawns? You act as if it's a good thing. Where is all that money going? Can you answer that?

    Basicly what you are saying is exactly my point, even though it might not be obvious. I've been talking over and over about the devaluation of labor. And, you are backing my point up by showing that someone can make more money by owning their own lawn care business than by working in an industry that is awash in money. The reason is that the money in the tech industry is going to the owners? Why is it going to the owners? Not because they deserve, even if in some cases they do, but the reason it is going to the owner is because competition at the top is small, while at the bottom it is huge. Then there are barriers to entry in this market that are making it difficult for people to make the jump from employee to owner. The end result is a system which rewards those with power, while undervaluing labor. The way to get rid of this imbalance is by fostering competition at the highest levels. You do this by heavily subsidizing and promoting businesses that have less that 5% market share(yes, the 5% is somewhat arbitrary, but it's important to keep it small, but not too small). By promoting competition on the supply side, and among the owners of businesses, they will be forced to compete. This will ultimately increase the number of businesses, which will increase demand for labor, lower prices, and help rebalance competition.

    This is my whole problem with free trade. It is effectively removing barriers to entry that third world workers have in the labor market, while at the same time keeping the barriers to entry that third world businesses are faced with in place. It is further tilting the balance of competition in favor of business owners. While they may be able to start their own small businesses, I won't even laugh at the absurdity of what you are saying. Who cares if they get crumbs if they are not given an equal chance to compete in the more lucrative businesses? What you are saying is that they will get some crumbs and that they should be

  281. Re:Why haven't they? Because the culture is broken by kalidasa · · Score: 1

    They haven't because the Indian Hindu culture is, in some ways, one of the most disfunctional in the world. When a U.S. company hires a Hindu worker, it usually gets someone who accepts the caste system, for example. The worker generally has a long history of accepting things the way they are and overlooking even major defects. (I spelled the word "disfunctional" because I don't like the original spelling.)

    If only "dysfunctional" were the limit of your ignorance. Tell me, what do you actually know about the Hindu caste system? Where did you get your 3M number? Something like this:

    But most are the followers that their culture requires them to be.

    is racism, pure and simple.

    evoke Godwin's Law

  282. Re:Why haven't they? Because the culture is broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This post was, an excellent example of, excessive use of commas, and an Ad Hominem attack.

    My roommate was from Bangladesh. He gave me a sobering view on world culture. But I won't get into that.

  283. Not an Anti-H1B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was just reading the comments from approximately a thousand people and the more I am reading the comments the more I am get a feeling of Xenophobia! This battle is no more on Sun getting sued, it has rather become a medium for criticizing a community. What a shame.

    But let me put up some points too to become a part of this ridiculous battle. H1B's getting paid less and being classified as "cheap labor" and slaves is all B.S. This is a completely wrong notion. They are paid exactly equal to the citizen and Green Card holders, and job positions and salary negotiations don't go with the visa status you have rather it goes with the capability and aptitude of the person. Half of these people on H1B visa are Masters or PhD students from the most reputed colleges in the U.S. They are definitely more qualified than most of the citizens working here. The technical skills that they possess supercedes most of the others and that is why in such a bad economic time they are still surviving here in the U.S. And for everybody's information when layoffs in companies are announced the H1B's are affected the most. Citizens can even grill burgers in a fast food joint to survive here, but H1B's have to leave the country and everything they have possessed till now. Think more humanly guys!

  284. mod this one up by redzebra · · Score: 1

    the phrasing is maybe not excellent but it surely touches the core of the problem.

    The problem is indeed not the the workers and is for sure not only an american problem.

    I work in a huge R&D department in europe and the last year I 've seen local workers being fired on a daily basis and being replaced by indian people (sometimes by multiple people iso 1 guy)

    The real problem is indeed the CEO's which are almost always LOCAL people. In this bad economical climat they do whatever it takes in order to save THEIR jobs.

    At this point, all of them ar going for cost reduction. Hiring foreign people is one method :
    - no huge taxes being paid to the local government (less financial obligations)
    - no complaining when they are asked to work more 12 hour's a day (less social obligations)

    As a short term vision this makes sense. However most of them fail to see that this is a disaster in the long run for the compagny itself and mostly their jobs. Most foreigners won't stay for years and the compagny wil have to repay each time over the money they lose when one leaves with his collected knowledge and experience. After a while the compagny is an empty can with no in-house knowledge.

    Fireing expensive, short term thinking CEO's and replacing them by less expesive ones would be a good thing but wouldn't realy matter.

    I'm afraid we'll just have to wait until economics go that bad so that long term vision pays of better than short term stock market.

  285. Re:In short - tsarkon reports sun haters are lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Awww. Da wittle boy fouwnd out his mommy and daddy don't know if you cusses and throws out obscenities online so now he's gonna go play. I hope you mature more as you age. If you're already an adult: just give it up. You'll never amount to anything with those communication skills.

  286. Re:H1-B isnt such a great deal for the Indians eit by forkboy · · Score: 1

    You're ashamed to be part of Slashdot because your country is still marginally 3rd world? My girlfriend's sister lives in India, I've been there to visit....I've seen droves of your little kids playing in sewer water and families with nowhere to go just propping up tents in abandonded areas of the city. I'm not trying to insult the people of India, I'm merely pointing out that the reason many of your citizens are coming to the US is because they don't have to live in squalor here, even on substandard wages. You're part of the Indian middle class...hooray for you...that's what, like 10% of your population that has that standard of living? If it's so great in India, why the fuck do so many of your professionals have a hard-on the get out of there?

    I'm glad you're not planning on coming to the US...the last thing we need is yet another foreign national coming here for our jobs then getting all bent out of shape when people say something negative about their home. So go have a Coke and a Vindaloo and shut the fuck up.

    --
    This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
  287. Re:H1-B isnt such a great deal for the Indians eit by forkboy · · Score: 1

    Open Source and Linux are arguably creating jobs, based on a recent /. article I'm too lazy to reference. At the very least it's not causing noticable declines in employment levels. Overpriced software on the other hand raises IT overhead and makes for more company layoffs and closures. There is no comparison between Linus creating the Linux kernel and Sun firing thousands of employees to replace with H1Bs. Your argument is neither logical nor founded in reality. Nice try though.

    --
    This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
  288. Re:moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We want to stop maniacal leaders having the option of using weapons of mass distruction, but we'll keep our nukes, thanks

    That is right, we don't care if normal countries that don't mass murder individuals have WMD. We do care if some wacko who would actually USE them on innocent people during a time of peace has them. We aren't invading pakastan or india because we know they won't just pop off a nuke at someone if they get mad.

    Competition and free enterprise is the one true way, as long as it doesn't threten our jobs or our standard of living even if we can;t be bothered to get off our fat, lazy arses and work harder and/or innovate.

    Really, this has to be a troll. Most people don't mind competition. I don't care if I lose my job to someone more qualified. I do care if I lose my job because a company is cutting costs by hiring someone from over seas for half my salary and who has half my job skills. As for the "fat" "lazy" and "lack of innovation". Where exactly do you think most of your IT stuff came from?

  289. Maybe it's time for an IT union? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe with something similar for I.T. it'd be harder for things like this to happen, is it time for that?
    - Plus it'd could all be opperated online

  290. two sides to this coin... by Ominous+Armed+Cow · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You're pronouncement cuts both ways. Just because companies can pick and choose between H1B's doesn't mean they won't choose a cheaper H1B resource over an American every time.

    If you're putting "I require H1-B sponsorship" on your resume, you might as well print below it:

    "I am aware that the visa process poses considerable paperwork and expense, so I'll be grateful for a job, I will work for considerably less than an American can afford to, and I am legally constrained from jumping to another opportunity after you've trained me, unlike those fickle Americans who bail as soon as they decide you're company sucks."

    America outlawed indentured servitude with the 13th Amendment. It's time to stop pretending that a worker who can be deported at a moment's notice isn't subject to a coercive employment situation.

  291. Re:fuckwit by darkov · · Score: 1

    Well if WMD are so evil, why does the US have them: nukes, biological and chemical in vast numbers. The US has killed more innocent people with WMD than anyone else. Did you forget Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

    Where exactly do you think most of your IT stuff came from?

    Taiwan, Japan, China, Korea. The only US product I have in my house is your crappy TV, which I manage to avoid most of the time. Except the Simpsons maybe, but, of course, that's produced by an Australian company.

  292. Those Indians love Java by fourletterbc · · Score: 1

    That's main reason why they don't hire as many americans..

  293. Re:Why haven't they? Because the culture is broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when you talk just about "productivity" as if it's a speed of producing you are missing another factor: you are producing problems at a given rate as well. The question is what future problems are you creating and how complex are you ensuring their solutions must be.

    Having said that, I have found indian programmers I have worked with to be to run the complete spectrum of ability, but if anything with a higher minimum ability for logical reasoning and analysis. Their reputation for a more passive demeanor in general is really just a cultural politeness, a more brash and assertive "american" sytle is not nec. a more effective way to influence the bigger picture.

    However, I think considering the HB1 program, companies are abusing it and local workers.

    It's not about bringing them here, that's fine imo, it's about the indentured quality of the program. Let them come and be citizens, then they are immigrants like us all. But the HB1 and other work visa arrangements put those workers on a lower rung of power than a citizen, so it's a way for companies to have unfair influences on their workers. Local workers will have to yeild ("volluntarily") their own rights to match, to be competitive in the market. That means people giving up their rights as citizens.

  294. Re:Why haven't they? Because the culture is broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I understand if you were offended. But are you here to say the caste system isn't racist itself? Is it no longer an influence? how is it really, then?

  295. H1-B vs. Green card by Vengeful+weenie · · Score: 1
    It seems to me that the H1-B visa was designed to get around the normal quota of green cards. This was needed for tech workers (in many industries) while the market was tight, because the import of talent is not taken into account (much). (The pool of green cards may be taken up by 10,000 plumbers and 2 techs in one particular year.) There should be two general conclusions draw:

    1. Sun has allegedly taken advantage of the H1-B
    2. The H1-B program has certain flaws which make it either obsolete, or poorly targeted.

    Question is, what could be done in order to improve H1-B, or is it just defunct in a down-turn market?

    I would add another point, which is that a recurring discussion in my family. The US has often done a rather poor job when it came to skilled labor. (I'm taking masons and such here.) The fact is that these skills were killed off during the advent of assembly line production, and the country has imported most of these skill sets ever since.

    Computer professionals often have similar "handcrafted" work to be done, does the US handle these skill any better now? Since there are few professional guilds does this skew the argument? Europe has more protection, and a long history of professional organizations and apprenticeship.

    1. Re:H1-B vs. Green card by minard · · Score: 1
      It seems to me that the H1-B visa was designed to get around the normal quota of green cards. This was needed for tech workers (in many industries) while the market was tight, because the import of talent is not taken into account (much). (The pool of green cards may be taken up by 10,000 plumbers and 2 techs in one particular year.)

      Not really. You can't apply for a green card straight off. You have to actually be resident in the US to do that. So, for employment related immigration, you need to get an H1-B first, then move to the US, then apply for a GC. When everything is said and done, you'll be eligible to apply for US citizenship after approximately 13 years, if you don't have any hiccups with the INS (I'm about 11 years away myself...)

  296. What about Sport in the USA? by Small+Hairy+Troll · · Score: 1

    So Americans have no problem poaching foreign nationals for top positions in our national sports teams. Half the ice-hockey team is made up of Russians? Who cares. 30% of the athletes in professional baseball aren't from the continental US? Who cares, just as long as the team in your city keeps winning their games.

    What about the American athletes who can't move up from the minor leagues? No-one cares as long as the team keeps winning and people can shout "USA, we're number 1".

    Manufacturing jobs moved to Mexico ? Who cares, I just want my DVD/MP3 player for less than $100.

    (sarcasm)What, you mean the IT industry is going the same way ? Oh woe. Quick, where are the tar and feathers, we're going to have a lynching.(/sarcasm)

  297. Careless Talk by drmofe · · Score: 2, Funny

    A manager at one of our strategy meetings made the comment that there were "Too many Chiefs and not enough Indians..." (indicating that there were too many Team Leaders and not enough people to be led.

    Someone at Sun Human Resources might have misunderstood this and started a recruiting drive...

  298. Re:H1-B isnt such a great deal for the Indians eit by OneFix · · Score: 1

    Its actually 10 days. 10 days to get a new job and file for a H1B or leave the country. Not much time at all.

    Ok, it still should be enough if you have the kind of rare and valuable talent that the H1B program was designed to fill...

    they are taxed by the US, but can't vote (taxation without representation, sound familiar?)

    Umh, that's because it's temporary employment...if you want representation, then apply for citizenship...otherwise, it doesn't bother you enough...

    Of course, then again, I'm sure you don't use any of our roads or public schools...right???

    OTOH, it could be argued that the same thing holds for those too young to vote as well...

    they dont have freedom of speech

    Oh, please...

    Do you actually think that publicly stating your opinion on domestic issues will get you deported?

    Re: finding another job in 30 days - obviously you've never looked for a tech job lately - even if you are excellently qualified it can take significantly longer than 30 days just to land 1 interview, let alone get an offer that you take. Try to do that in 10 days - no way jose!

    No, as a matter of fact, I just got a job after being unemployeed for a period of time...

    To be honest, my previous statement still holds true...if you can't find a job almost immediately (even in the current market), then there's probably a citizen with the same or better skills out there...

    In reference to H1Bs - most of us them have advanced degrees. To get a H1B job you basically have to have at minimum a Bachelors, and many others have Masters and even some PhDs. H1Bs aren't rubber stamped by some fly by night technical institute.

    I'm not saying all, H1Bs are "rubber stamped by some fly by night technical institute", but there are a signifigant ammount of H1Bs with these degrees...probably more than in the citizen market...

    Some H1Bs are here because of inside connections and have little skill...but others are here because they honestly posses a much needed skill...I've known both kinds and to be honest, the talented H1Bs should be happy to see more limitations put into the system...it will at the very least improve the public opinion of the program...

  299. this wil get lost in the shuffle posting so late.. by Paolomania · · Score: 1

    ...but I can't help feeling like "globalization" is entirely one-sided due to the geographical constraints of most people vs. most corporations - i.e. multinational X can shop around for cheap labor in country Y, but I can't reciprocally go to country Y to pick up cheap consumer products. especially with enforced geographical constraints such as region encoding on multimedia discs, companies get to keep the differential in their favor, paying the cheapest wage and charging the highest price. as foreign jobs ship overseas, we will eventually be put in a condition of earning the cheapest wage yet paying the highest prices.

  300. They're Brahmin aristocrats, not desparate urchins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    H1B's generally come from desperate situations
    BS... Many of them are upper-class university-educated sons and daughters of prosperous families. They grew up with f***ing servants in their house. They are elitists and have a lot of trouble adjusting to American democratic meritocracy.

  301. delusions by pacchoiboy · · Score: 1

    Many of the posters seem to be under the delusion that employers must "prove" that they cannot find anyone to do the work or that they are paying the prevailing wage rate. In fact the are only required to provide a signature to that effect. The distinction is not lost on any major corporation. Another common delusion is that the H1B workers have the skills required in the job posting. Do they really think that it is difficult (or expensive) to get whatever credentials are required in India? The American applicant is required to provide references that will surely be checked. Corporations obviously create phoney requirements that no American with the skills will accept at the stated rate. When no one applies, they are free to hire overseas and get careless on examining skills. My favorite ( I applied for this to see if I would even get a reply ) was when a major high tech company in Portland advertised for someone with 5 years previous experience in SAP including succesful implementations and 10 years of Oracle experience and offered $35,000 per year. For god sakes, they don't even pay day care workers at their plant that little! One of the biggest delusions is that it is legitimate to pay an H1B worker the same as an American for the same job as if it all comes out even. No way. The H1B worker is going to drive to work on the roads I paid for, be protected by the police my property taxes support. receive justice from me sitting on a jury for $11 per day, and be protected from having all his property taken from him by my arms. The last represents an extremely high cost to me. I spent two years as a draftee in the U. S. Army, including one year in Viet Nam. I didn't run into George Bush jr, Dick Cheney, Bill Gates, any HB1 workers, or any corporations working for $245 per month while I was there. Another delusion is that people who oppose H1B workers are racists. In fact, the program discriminates on the basis of national origin because it does not guarantee the same rights to Americans. If you think otherwise, go try to start a business or get a job in another country. You'll quickly find out that you won't receive the same rights as their nationals. Long term the biggest delusion is that this is in any way good for America. It is really just a repeat of the '50s and '60s when the Japanese sent representatives to study American manufacturing and in the '70s and '80s took over industry after industry. The first stage has already taken place with the move major bread and butter software development and support overseas. The H1B's are just a minor part of the trend. They are only required because some jobs cannot be moved. That's why we have all these HB1 NT server and network administrators filling positions that Americans are to uneducated, old, or stupid to do. The next step will be the move of the application systems to overseas siting as bandwith expands. The final step is the most dangerous and has nothing to do with jobs. It is the move of bank records, medical records, academic records, criminal records, credit records, marriage and divorce, etc to flags of convenience. At this point your Constitution isn't going to do you much good because people will be deciding you are the wrong color or eat the wrong kind of food in a country the employers right to do anything they want is considered sacred. The Senate will happily sign away your civil rights under a Treaty and you will have no recourse. ( I found out about an obscure item called something like the Japanese American Maritime Treaty just before a RIF at a former employer. The gist of it is that if you work for Japanese company they can replace you with a Japanese worker without any justification. Funny thing about it, they didn't lay off any Japanese -- just Americans, Mexicans, Vietnamese, and any other group they could find.) One of the strangest delusions I've seen among younger workers in IT is that somehow think they are players in the game and can stand up to multi-billion, multi-national corporations as individuals. Almost

    1. Re:delusions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh for fuck's sake, learn to use the p tag... Your rant is one giant sentence. I guess I could hire a H1-B Indian to read it to me for a bag of rice...

    2. Re:delusions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, I didn't read your entire comment but I saw this "The H1B worker is going to drive to work on the roads I paid for, be protected by the police my property taxes support. receive justice from me sitting on a jury for $11 per day, and be protected from having all his property taken from him by my arms"

      I have seen innumerable variants of this rant. Don't you folks get it? H1-B WORKERS PAY MEDICARE, SOCIAL SECURITY TAXES IN ADDITION TO REGULAR TAXES. WORSE, THEY CANNOT BENEFIT FROM THE MEDICARE AND SOCIAL SECURITY TAXES THEY PAY.
      So please stop ranting that H1-B workers are living off the taxes you pay. It's actually worse because

      1. H1-B workers pay these taxes and don't get any benefit

      2. They can't name their family as dependents (and so pay higher taxes) because their family is not in the US.

    3. Re:delusions by macker · · Score: 1

      "The H1B worker is going to drive to work on the roads I paid for, be protected by the police my property taxes support. receive justice from me sitting on a jury for $11 per day, and be protected from having all his property taken from him by my arms"

      "Don't you folks get it? H1-B WORKERS PAY MEDICARE, SOCIAL SECURITY TAXES IN ADDITION TO REGULAR TAXES. WORSE, THEY CANNOT BENEFIT FROM THE MEDICARE AND SOCIAL SECURITY TAXES THEY PAY."

      *We* get it. You don't.

      The services listed, police & fire protection, local public schools, roads, etc. are NOT paid
      for by "social security" "medicare", etc.
      The come out of federal, state, and municipal
      income taxes, the exact taxes that aren't covered for the first 5 years of the subject contracts.

      It is NOT a symmetrical arrangement, as any US citizen working overseas can tell you.

      Sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.

      --
      (T)he (O)ld (M)an
  302. Get a life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you can't compete, you die. That's life. Sorry folks, but you can't tell your boss who he can hire and who he can't hire. It's none of your business, and your livelyhood comes from your particular talents, not to some "obligation" that your employer has to keep you happy. Union organizers would have you believe that they can stop the world from turning.

    1. Re:Get a life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If you can't compete, you die. That's life. "

      Yeah sure, because the human race certainly hasn't created technology to help itself. Let's live like animals and kill each other for food.

      Asshole.

    2. Re:Get a life. by diggitzz · · Score: 1


      I disagree with both of you.

      The first AC here obviously didn't read the article. The Indian workers were "exempt" from evaluations that determined who would be fired, purely because they were new. It's not like Sun did this over night; they'd bring in a few Indian workers and can a few Americans, then have an evaluation a few weeks later, and can and replace a few more Americans -- no one can compete with someone who's "above" evaluation by virtue of some management policy designed specifically for that purpose. It has very little to do wih the skills and experience of either person, and more to do with a desire by the company to cut costs (and then *still* charge $30,000 for a workstation!).

      The second AC has not only misinterpreted the first AC, but additionally has come to believe that technology is all that's preventing cannibalism. Simple logic will tell anyone that if humans ate each other in the time before they invented weapons, we wouldn't have survived to invent them. Further, even if that statement was logically sound, it has nothing at all do do with the issue. I understand if you support unions, but a lack of unions doesn't make people cannibals.

      I believe that Sun is just asking for a lawsuit.

      Firing 52-yr-olds (aka "people who are about to collect pension for loyalty to the same co for 30 yrs") in order to replace them with two 25-yr-olds is sleazy to begin with. I mean, wait 3 years, let the guys retire and collect the pension they've been promised for 30 years, and then hire replacements.

      Firing *good* American workers to hire foreign workers, or not allowing them to compete with one another *at all*, is also sleazy.

      So that's a double-sleaze count for Sun, which means double incentive for someone to sue them, especially in California.

      --
      -=[You cannot consistently judge this statement to be true.]=-
    3. Re:Get a life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but you can't tell your boss who he can hire and who he can't hire.

      True. But you can let it be known to all the bosses that if they don't get their priorities back in line, some of them are going to be shot in the head.

      It's amazing how much hiring patterns can change after a few CEOs die.

      But it's at least 10 years until the bullets start flying.

  303. HOORAY! DIE, SUN, DIE! by crazyphilman · · Score: 1

    Java sucks anyway, I'm using gcc and kdevelop!

    --
    Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
  304. H1B : 1st or 3rd world?? by mcdade · · Score: 1

    This is really a double edge sword. The complaints about the H1B is really related to where the workers are comming from. There seems to be two factions, first world H1B workers and 3rd world H1B workers. I have some friends that are H1B workers, both from Canada, they get paid like Americans and pretty much fit american profiles (one is a physist, the other an accountant). In one case, the company likes to hire H1B workers for the position because of the traveling required with the job. Seems most american workers don't want to leave home and travel the world. Guess they figure that H1B workers are more open to this, since they did leave their home to go work in the US. I have never heard anyone say negative things to them about working in the US.

    The second set of workers are the people from 3rd world nations that come over and receive less pay then an American and are basically servents of the companies that they work for. The are treated badly by the companies, and receive less pay for more hours of work. The only way to stop this is for these workers to stop taking the jobs (doubt this will happen since they can make more in a week in the US then they could in a year in their own country) or for the the Gov't to crack down on these companies that are taking advantage of this situation. I also recall there being an indian saying something like 'The eldest son must die for the family', which basically relates to they must work their ass off even at their own happiness to support their family. There are a number of workers who come over, get a dirt cheap place, crappy car and send back a good portion of their pay check to the family. They work and save up enough to in those 6 years to not have to work again in India.. they are betting on it. Some fall in to the traps of Americanism don't want to leave and to aquire stuff.

    Oh.. ever wonder why there are so many forigners running the convience stores? they work over here as owners, don't pay taxes to the US, send all the profits back home, and when the time they are allowed to live here expires, they transfer ownership to someone else in the family who come over and work the store.. repeat process till America is bleed dry..

    I'm looking to go work in Europe.. where 4 to 6 weeks of vaction time is mandatory! oh.. and no one works weekends like a religion. Americans should really watch "Office Space" and really take notes.

    1. Re:H1B : 1st or 3rd world?? by cryofan2 · · Score: 1

      WHat is "office space"?

      I also am thinking about taking my life savings and going overseas and retiring early..

      In a couple of years I will have a nest egg big enough so that the interest would pay rent and food in rural latin america. I have a simple lifestyle and all I need is basic foodstuffs and an internet connection.

  305. Re:Why haven't they? Because the culture is broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With regards to programmer productivity:

    Individual worker productivity on software projects is somewhat hard to measure(this doesn't stop people from trying of course), but team productivity is a little more approachable. It has been shown time and time again that different teams can vary by orders of magnitude with regards to their productivity. Somewhere close to half of all programming projects still fail by most accounts. If developing your application using domestic resources will cost you 1 million dollars, but you know it won't cost significantly more, and you know fairly accurately when it will be completed, that may be a lot better than having the project done in India for a tenth of the price and not knowing when, or if, it will be completed. Note, that this doen't just apply to outsoucing to India...

  306. Re: Bad Management by rados · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sun's board and shareholders would do good to fire the management of the company. Sun has never made good revenues from software development efforts and their hardware/OS isn't anything you can't get from IBM or HP at competitive prices.

    Their stock is down under 4.00 and headed for the penny stock market.

    They gave away the one good software product they have..Java..and the fact that it's become a better product over time is due to the contributions of developers from other companies...the ones that make profits from it.

    McNealy's MS bashing is the same failed management defined strategy used by Jobs at Apple in the 80's and Netscape in the 90's. Apple took a big fall after that and we all know where Netscape is. Bashing the competition as a sole marketing strategy for your new product is a sorry excuse for a marketing campaign. I don't doubt that their new 'web services ide' isn't just as much hype as their previous attempts at software product development done without the assistance of engineers from more competent companies and put up for sale.

    The fact that multiple former employees are bringing suit is just a PR burn undoubtedly created by bad management decisions. It just shows a complete lack of loyalty between Sun and it's employees and given the debacles at Eron/Worldcom etc it's that's just plain bad PR for the management of the company.

    The strength and quality of a company's products is definitely reflected in it's relationship with its employees and requires maintaining loyalty from a company.

    Laying people off isn't just bad PR, it shows an incompetent management team that is incapable of marketing and selling products...and obviously too stupid to keep the people that make the products making them. The fact is the management team is unable to get people to produce good quality products that customers need and desire and get those products marketed and sold and that's why they call upon the God Economy and use it as an excuse for their own failure.

    The fact is computer systems are used to increase productivity and income so a bad economy should be a better market for computer systems.

  307. Re:Why haven't they? Because the culture is broken by humblecoder · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Here's the catch, composer777...

    The H1-B didn't come about because of lassez-faire, capitalist economics. It came about because of GOVERNMENT REGULATION. The government passed a law which made it possible for companies to hire foreign workers and pay them below market wages. Because H1-B workers can't switch jobs easily, they have no leverage in negotiating salarys. In effect, this is govermnent subsidy that benefits corporations.

    I would argue that the solutions is to have the government stop passing regulations and give H1-B workers the freedom to ask for a raise or leave for a better job.

  308. Don't You Get it? Payroll taxes support the US !! by ProudVeteran · · Score: 1

    Oh boy! Another phat-dumb-and-happy American ready to bail on his/her fellow Americans - not unlike the power elite who are hiding in Belize to avoid paying US taxes. This is the kind of selfish attitude that is going to doom Americans. Say, you might want to grab that "nest egg" during this brief pro-war bubble in the market. The market will again continue it's downward spiral once the reality of our poor economy, high unemployment, and increasing inflation set back in. Once our government dips into the pot to borrow more money for the war and rebuilding the interest rates will soar along with inflation. The H-1B program and off shore contracts only make this worse by reducing payroll tax revenue in America. Don't any of you get it? Our entire country is funded by payroll taxes. The only reason our economy didn't crash after the factory jobs were shipped overseas in the 1980s is because the tech boom took up the slack. Now there is nothing to take up the slack for the lost IT jobs. This whole globalization pipe dream is going to catapult America into a deep economic depression. This is only the beginning.

  309. Re:Why haven't they? Because the culture is broken by LonelyKindGuy · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately the same technology that is enabling telecommuting for some employees _is_ sending their job overseas. Yes, there are still cultural differences and locality in development still makes a huge difference (yelling across a cubicle wall is faster than email), but that huge difference in wages is the apple tempting many executives. It can't happen here? Tell that to memory manufacturers. How about popcorn logic parts? The largest fab houses in the world now are in Taiwan. The U.S. still has the lead in microprocessor manufacturing, but has surrendered all other chip arenas. You don't think the same thing will happen with software? He who controls the hardware eventually controls the software.

  310. Re:Don't You Get it? Payroll taxes support the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    err, ok, I need some explanation. How does payroll taxation get reduced by H1-B visas? I saw somebody earlier suggest that H1-B visa holders don't pay taxes (not true). Or are you referreing to the fallacy that H1-B holders are getting paid "slave wages" (another frequently trotted out myth).

    I'm an H1-B holder, and I can assure you I pay taxes on my $130k...

  311. Slashdot text input form sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The comment form isn't very user friendly.

    I'm testing now to see if Plain Old Text doesn't screw up the formatting.

    I don't want to be wrestling html tags every other sentence.

  312. Post using "Plain Old Text" option - works OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, the Plain Old Text option doesn't lose paragraph formatting.

    (whew)

    1. Re:Post using "Plain Old Text" option - works OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry. I had no idea I was saving html. It took me 5 tries to get my preferences to save as plain old text. Now I see that "change" doesn't allow comments to be changed so I can't fix my post.

  313. 2nd AC here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The second AC has not only misinterpreted the first AC, but additionally has come to believe that technology is all that's preventing cannibalism. "

    What I am trying to say is that this whole idea of an 'economy' and 'jobs' and 'competing or else you die' is as obsolete as a vacuum tube computer in an era where technology has given us (us= human race, lest you misinterpret my words as a misinterpretation) vastly increased food supply, scientific understanding of diseases and processes never before (before = last few hundred years, I take a long view) understood, etc..

    I think the only thing between us (us=human race) and a very good existence for all (all=human race) is *ourselves* and our insistence on applying an outmoded model (capitalism) to a world were its (capitalism's) basic tenets are, well, untenable.

    I hope you won't misinterpret that.

  314. At $130K your days are numbered, dude by ProudVeteran · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry; but right off I have a problem believing an H-1B is earning $130k net right now. Could it be you just want to make me jealous? Could it be that you want to evade the clear fact that H-1Bs in general earn less than American counterparts? Surely you take advantage of the nonresident alien formulas at the IRS. You can skew these formulas by taking frequent trips out of the country - even day visits to Mexico. Oh, and what about the H-1Bs who live here on tax-free expense per diems while the bulk of their salary is paid in their home country? This is a common mode of operation for Tata subsidiaries. You can pull the wool over the eyes of our dumb politicians but your jive won't work on American techs. We work next to you guys. We know your games. Fortunately, many of your fellow H-1Bs are much more honest about how they are really paid and treated. More than one has confided in me about breaking away from their current contract because thay can barely survive and are tired of working overtime for free. They came to me because I was an independent American contractor with my own Subchapter S corporation.

    1. Re:At $130K your days are numbered, dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a clarification: After a non-resident alien has been in the United States for more than 5 years, they are considered citizens for tax purposes. And have to file 1040 instead of 1040NR (non-resident) or the 1040 NR-EZ. At this point any economic treaties between your country and United States do not apply any more to get you any tax-treaty exemptions.

      This holds true regardless of the number of times you visit Mexico or any other mentioned territory.

      This definitely applies to F-1 and H1-B holders. I don't know about other visa classes. :)

      I understand the underlying concern, though.

  315. Re:Why haven't they? Because the culture is broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would argue that the solutions is to have the government stop passing regulations and give H1-B workers the freedom to ask for a raise or leave for a better job.

    That means more power to people who are desperate to immigrate. Obviously, the govt. and many current citizens would dislike that. So there is no way but to reduce the rights of H1b's. And that ends up giving the corporations more power over workers (both H1B and local). The good always comes with the bad.

  316. Dang this HTML format bug - I'll get it right yet by ProudVeteran · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry; but right off I have a problem believing an H-1B is earning $130k net right now. Could it be you just want to make me jealous? Could it be that you want to evade the clear fact that H-1Bs in general earn less than American counterparts?

    Surely you take advantage of the nonresident alien formulas at the IRS. You can skew these formulas by taking frequent trips out of the country - even day visits to Mexico.

    Oh, and what about the H-1Bs who live here on tax-free expense per diems while the bulk of their salary is paid in their home country? This is a common mode of operation for Tata subsidiaries.

    You can pull the wool over the eyes of our dumb politicians but your jive won't work on American techs. We work next to you guys. We know your games.

    Fortunately, many of your fellow H-1Bs are much more honest about how they are really paid and treated. More than one has confided in me about breaking away from their current contract because thay can barely survive and are tired of working overtime for free. They came to me because I was an independent American contractor with my own Subchapter S corporation.

  317. What idiots these people are who run sun? by kiwi-matgar · · Score: 1

    I mean, sure, you want to cut costs and look for cheaper labour, no problems but don't do it in such a stupid manor, I mean, why not set up an office in India and then gradually strink down the US operations?

    btw. Labour costs are the only problem, how about getting TI to cut down on their manufacturing costs, or better yet, move it to UMC and TSMC. As for assembly, why assemble SUN stations in the 3rd most expensive country to do business in? that is no smart! Outsource production like all the other manufacturers have done.

  318. I'm WAY past worrying about ripple effect by ProudVeteran · · Score: 1

    Coy comments coming from another FDH (Fat Dumb & Happy) American.

    I'm a Vietnam vet. My father was a WWII vet. Now my son is going to be called for Iraq.

    But, I lost my job to an H-1B worker from India. He won't have to risk his life for America nor will his sons and daughters. Now I'm facing bankruptcy and can no longer send my son to college.

    No, I'm way past worrying about ripple effects. I'm at the point of picking up my M-16 and fragging some folks!! For me, this is a war!! I was ready to die fighting as a soldier to protect your freedom. I'm sure darn ready to die fighting to save my family's well being!! And the first folks in my sights are going to be H1B-loving Americans!!

    DAMN YOU WHIMPY WEASEL TRAITORS!! YOU WOULDN'T LAST ONE DAY CRAWLING ON YOUR BELLY IN A RICE PADDIE!! YOU'D DIE WITHOUT YOUR CELL PHONE, PDA, AND STARBUCKS!!

    1. Re:I'm WAY past worrying about ripple effect by PatSand · · Score: 1
      Sorry...this is pure BS you are spouting...

      1. There are no guarantees beyond Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness--not having Happiness guaranteed...that's the dark side of Capitalism/Free Enterprise/America (take your pick)

      2. I've lost jobs over the decades to "Minority Filling", "Women", "Under Qualified", "Over Qualified", "Too Expensive", "Too Little Experience", "Too Much Experience (i.e., expected high salary)"...Sounds like you can use some career training...I've done it and continue to do it. The latest set of reasons are "the H1B and L1 visa folks are..." so that just gets tacked onto my list...

      3. Get over the fact that IT jobs are leaving the US...I've made a good living at it but I'm also transitioning to other fields/areas. As my fiance asks, "How many 50+ year old Senior Programmers/Developers do you see"? Too *$#(@! few...

      4. Busted on Fat...but I've lost 50 lbs and am working out regularly at the gym...besides, what relevance has that got to IT jobs?

      5. Far from dumb...during Vietnam time I was working at DOD in one of those areas where brains are prized and silence is golden...true, I didn't slog through the rice paddies but I helped keep your butt alive with intel...

      By the way, I am comfortable with weapons of near destruction (father and brother made sure of that) and have no doubt that I can fight in a war, if they really need someone rather mature (and sneaky)...

      6. Happy is right! I'm getting out of the S**T work and into something better (having a life), having a fiance, and leaving work at work at the end of the day...I've spent too many years living to work...

      7. Notice what I said: I don't want HIBs (or the L1 visa folks) taking my job...I'd rather hold domestic companies to old-time standards of doing it right consistently. Quaint notion, apparently, in Internet-Time...

      Strongly suggest you chill out, take a pill, hug your kids, or do whatever non-violent thing you need to do to get this nastiness out of your system...

      --
      Supreme Granter of Doctor of Obviology Letters ("A FIRM Command of the Obvious")
  319. No by Featureless · · Score: 1

    Other contries complain about it, and individuals do get around it. Do you mistake complaints and exceptions for a trend?

    You are arguing in the face of massive, incontrivertible evidence that contries like India, for instance, have no shortage of talented people even for the highest levels of the software and hardware engineering fields. Where's your brain drain? It was a brain loan.

    Even if we opened our borders and invited their people to come here, not all of them would; there are bigger trends at work over the long haul. But that doesn't mean you want to encourage the opposite with a stupid policy. If you're self-interested you have to at least try, eh?

    1. Re:No by MKalus · · Score: 1


      Even if we opened our borders and invited their people to come here, not all of them would; there are bigger trends at work over the long haul. But that doesn't mean you want to encourage the opposite with a stupid policy. If you're self-interested you have to at least try, eh?


      I don't know if you've noticed or not, but the US seems to have turned a little bit xenophobic lately which is quite a feature for such a diverse country.

      The chances for the US to let in more immigrants and people who want to come to the US is pretty mute, much more so with the current situation.

      I do agree though that at the end of the day the US (and other countries) would profit from it.

      M.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
  320. I'm WAY past worrying about being Good !! by ProudVeteran · · Score: 1

    I'm a Vietnam vet. My father was a WWII vet. Now my son is going to be called for Iraq.

    But, I lost my job to an H-1B worker from India. He won't have to risk his life for America nor will his sons and daughters. Now I'm facing bankruptcy and can no longer send my son to college.

    No, I'm way past worrying about being good. I'm at the point of picking up my M-16 and fragging some folks!! For me, this is a war!! I was ready to die fighting as a soldier to protect your freedom. I'm sure darn ready to die fighting to save my family's well being!! And the first folks in my sights are going to be H1B-loving Americans!!

    DAMN YOU WHIMPY WEASEL TRAITORS!! YOU WOULDN'T LAST ONE DAY CRAWLING ON YOUR BELLY IN A RICE PADDIE!! YOU'D DIE WITHOUT YOUR CELL PHONE, PDA, AND STARBUCKS!!

  321. Re:Why haven't they? Because the culture is broken by mobius_stripper · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why is the parent modded up? It is merely spouting thinly veiled racist stereotypes.
    I am an Indian (and nominally a Hindu by birth). There is no such thing as a standard "disfunctional Indian Hindu culture" among Indians. It is similar to making the claim that Americans have a "loud, fat, Christian warmongering" culture.
    Indians, just like people of all other countries, come with a wide variety of mindsets.
    If Indians were merely sheep who followed management/leadership directives blindly, they would lack the initiative to run an advanced space program, independently develop nuclear technology or even remain a democracy for more than 50 years.
    The real reason why we're not seeing the next Microsoft or Intel start in India is that most Indians with the talent and initiative choose to start or join Silicon Valley firms, since India lacks a lot of the infrastructure necessary for these kinds of firms to be based in that country.
    Give India another 10 years to get its act together in terms of infrastructure and education, and I guarantee you'll see corporations comparable to Intel or Sony start up in India.

    Krishna

    --
    --- I'd love to go out with you, but I have to study for a Turing test.
  322. It's not only the H1B program... also the L-1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TCS, aka Tata Consultancy Service, has been using the L-1 visa program for the same purpose since clamping down on H1-Bs.

    FACT: GE Medical Systems signed a $35M/year contract with TCS in late 2001. In 2002, they had brought over 800 H1-B and L-1 employees from India to work in Milwaukee, WI. During this period, there were multiple downsizings of American employees.

  323. Sun Founder shoots own foot on 60 Minutes !! by ProudVeteran · · Score: 1

    H-1B and JOB DESTRUCTION NEWSLETTER: www.ZaZona.com

    Here is another article that discusses the class-action lawsuit against Sun Microsystems. As many as 2,400 ex-Sun workers may be involved so
    this is a huge lawsuit. Considering the size of this lawsuit you would think that it would be all over the California newspapers, but that's
    not the case. So far the newspapers are keeping the lid on this story. Perhaps they have some Sun stock to dump first.

    There is a sweet irony in what is happening because that awful "60 Minutes" story on Bombay University (IIT) will be used in the lawsuit.
    View this excerpt from "60 Minutes" and you will see what I mean:
    LESLEY STAHL:
    Vinod Khosla got into IIT about 30 years ago. After graduating, he came to the U.S., co-founded Sun Microsystems, and became one of Silicon Valley's most important venture capitalists. He's one of thousands of
    IIT graduates who've made it big in the U.S.

    How significant would you say the impact of IIT graduates has been on the American technology revolution?

    VINOD KHOSLA:
    It's far greater than most people realize. Microsoft, Intel, PC's - Sun
    Microsystems - you name it, I can't imagine a major area where Indian
    IIT engineers haven't played a leading role.

    LESLEY STAHL: Leading role?

    VINOD KHOSLA:
    A leading role. And of course, the American consumer and the American business in the end is the beneficiary of that.

    LESLEY STAHL:
    It isn't just high tech; the head of the giant consulting firm McKinsey & Company is an IIT grad, so is the vice-chairman of Citigroup, and the former CEO of US Airways. Fortune 500 head hunters are always on the lookout for that IIT degree.

    VINOD KHOSLA:
    They are favored over almost anybody else. If you are a Wasp walking in for a job, you wouldn't have as much pre-assigned credibility as you do if you're an engineer from IIT.

    LESLEY STAHL:
    Ninety percent of IIT students are male, and the young men we met in Bombay know they're hot commodities. The American companies love the
    kids from IIT.

    ****************
    In that interview Khosla flat out admits that Sun prefers Indians from IIT, and of course most IIT students in this male dominated society are
    almost exclusively young men. Lesley Stahl adored Khosla too much to question his bigotry or arrogance. His racist comments about WASPS
    would have caused an uproar if they were made about any other minority group, and it's puzzling why the National Organization for Women isn't all over Stahl for that statement on how those IIT males are hot
    commodities.

    Vinod and his "frat girl" interviewer Lesley Stahlor, probably never imagined that this interview would be cannon fodder for the lawyer
    handling the lawsuit. During Guy Santiglia's court hearing Sun totally denied that they preferred H-1Bs, but they admitted that they
    understand that if they did, it would amount to discrimination. Here is a choice quote:
    Sun spokesperson Diane Carlini said the company didn't take national origin, visa status or salary into account in cutting its work force from about 42,000 to 35,000 beginning about 18 months ago. To have considered national origin or visa status would have amounted to discrimination, she said.

    Carlini was referring to Guy Santiglia's complaint in the article below
    when she said that Sun has been cleared of similar charges that its H-1B practices violated labor laws. "It seems similar to what we've
    seen in the past where we have been cleared." There is one thing that isn't similar, this class-action was filed by a very skilled attorney
    by the name of James Caputo. You can bet that Carlini will be working overtime on her next bit of spin doctoring because this Caputo will
    have Sun sweating.

    Obviously Sun has a policy of preferring IIT grads because they are Indian. If they were truly superior students this might be justifiable, but here is a point of view that "60 Minutes" doesn't care to air:

    Dr. Norman Matlo

  324. they DO get paid well some places by bobalu · · Score: 1

    My mother is a technical recruiter with a medium size company and when I said something about H1Bs working for less money she told me that in fact many of them are very demanding, salary-wise, and basically that just wasn't true at all. Of course that's just her company.

    But hell, I gotta believe my Mom. :-)

    --
    The revolution will NOT be televised.
  325. hmmm Nike? by Chicks_Hate_Me · · Score: 1

    Isn't that why Nikes are so much cheaper now than if they were made in the United States?

    Cheaper prices don't come just from cheaper labor, it also comes from supply and demand. I'm stating the obvious, but supply is high for tech jobs and demand is low; therefore tech workers are a cheap commodity. Corporations just view us as machines that can be easily replaced. This is the way it has always been and will always be (so this is capitalism?)

    I hope you enjoy the rest of your life in the cube farms wage slave.

  326. VERY GOOD POINT! TIME FOR BASTILLE DAY by ProudVeteran · · Score: 1

    You have a very good point about the relative unfairness of globalization. Hopefully this won't get lost in the shuffle.

    Until we can easily obtain cheap products from India, and other H-1B countries, the program isn't fair at all.

    This is not the "fair and equal treatment" I expect from my government.

    IT'S TIME FOR A NEW-ERA BASTILLE DAY!!

  327. This is why we need to educate Americans for these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    jobs....and kick the Indians and Chinese out of our CS programs!

  328. BREAKING NEWS: SUN MIGHT DIE AFTERALL! by ProudVeteran · · Score: 1

    H-1B and JOB DESTRUCTION NEWSLETTER: www.ZaZona.com

    Here is another article that discusses the class-action lawsuit against Sun Microsystems. As many as 2,400 ex-Sun workers may be involved so
    this is a huge lawsuit. Considering the size of this lawsuit you would think that it would be all over the California newspapers, but that's
    not the case. So far the newspapers are keeping the lid on this story. Perhaps they have some Sun stock to dump first.

    There is a sweet irony in what is happening because that awful "60 Minutes" story on Bombay University (IIT) will be used in the lawsuit.
    View this excerpt from "60 Minutes" and you will see what I mean:
    LESLEY STAHL:
    Vinod Khosla got into IIT about 30 years ago. After graduating, he came to the U.S., co-founded Sun Microsystems, and became one of Silicon Valley's most important venture capitalists. He's one of thousands of
    IIT graduates who've made it big in the U.S.

    How significant would you say the impact of IIT graduates has been on the American technology revolution?

    VINOD KHOSLA:
    It's far greater than most people realize. Microsoft, Intel, PC's - Sun Microsystems - you name it, I can't imagine a major area where Indian IIT engineers haven't played a leading role.

    LESLEY STAHL: Leading role?

    VINOD KHOSLA:
    A leading role. And of course, the American consumer and the American business in the end is the beneficiary of that.

    LESLEY STAHL:
    It isn't just high tech; the head of the giant consulting firm McKinsey & Company is an IIT grad, so is the vice-chairman of Citigroup, and the former CEO of US Airways. Fortune 500 head hunters are always on the lookout for that IIT degree.

    VINOD KHOSLA:
    They are favored over almost anybody else. If you are a Wasp walking in for a job, you wouldn't have as much pre-assigned credibility as you do if you're an engineer from IIT.

    LESLEY STAHL:
    Ninety percent of IIT students are male, and the young men we met in Bombay know they're hot commodities. The American companies love the kids from IIT.

    ****************
    In that interview Khosla flat out admits that Sun prefers Indians from IIT, and of course most IIT students in this male dominated society are
    almost exclusively young men. Lesley Stahl adored Khosla too much to question his bigotry or arrogance. His racist comments about WASPS
    would have caused an uproar if they were made about any other minority group, and it's puzzling why the National Organization for Women isn't all over Stahl for that statement on how those IIT males are hot commodities.

    Vinod and his "frat girl" interviewer Lesley Stahlor, probably never imagined that this interview would be cannon fodder for the lawyer
    handling the lawsuit. During Guy Santiglia's court hearing Sun totally denied that they preferred H-1Bs, but they admitted that they
    understand that if they did, it would amount to discrimination. Here is a choice quote:
    Sun spokesperson Diane Carlini said the company didn't take national origin, visa status or salary into account in cutting its work force from about 42,000 to 35,000 beginning about 18 months ago. To have considered national origin or visa status would have amounted to discrimination, she said.

    Carlini was referring to Guy Santiglia's complaint in the article below when she said that Sun has been cleared of similar charges that its H-1B practices violated labor laws. "It seems similar to what we've seen in the past where we have been cleared." There is one thing that isn't similar, this class-action was filed by a very skilled attorney by the name of James Caputo. You can bet that Carlini will be working overtime on her next bit of spin doctoring because this Caputo will
    have Sun sweating.

    Obviously Sun has a policy of preferring IIT grads because they are Indian. If they were truly superior students this might be justifiable.

    1. Re:BREAKING NEWS: SUN MIGHT DIE AFTERALL! by crazyphilman · · Score: 1

      I've worked with a lot of Indian H1-Bs, and out of all of those, I've only met one I thought was really competent. Most of the rest have been kind of so-so as programmers. I think that the hype about IIT is just pro-India propaganda. The Indian government has made no bones about its policy of aggressively pushing itself as the "back office of the world". There was even an article in Wired about it; the Indian government considers H1-Bs and outsourcing to be the best way to bring India out of poverty (at our expense of course). I feel that this is a sort of economic war, undeclared and ignored by the media. And, India isn't even trying to hide it. They BRAG about it in interviews!

      I hope Sun totally gets reamed in this. If Sun were to cease to exist, I wouldn't weep one single, bitter tear. Die, Sun, Die.

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
  329. Far from it!! by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    There are still computer jobs around, and still will be - as I said even if you move jobs overseas, you still need liaisons.

    But really, I see the whole oversea outsourcing thing is a fad. Not because programmers in India are not as good as US programmers (there are a few H1-B people from India on my team and they are really quite good) but because having your development that far removed from your business is idiotic. Either businesses will realize that and pull back some jobs to the US, or they will not and wane as competitors eat them for lunch.

    That's just overseas jobs - cheap H1-B workers here just mean lower salaries for IT workers here. But as I said before, those H1-B workers need to live somewhere and eat just like you and me... so they can't take the $6k salaries the overseas programmers might take.

    Companies are terribly short-sighted right now. I'm not sure what to do about that other than start up small companies that take advantage of that short-sightedness...

    Even so, like I said, there will be jobs, even if fewer in number (or then again, perhaps not once companies start hiring again).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  330. Dear Mamma's Boy by ProudVeteran · · Score: 1

    Any H-1B earning more than $50k right now is as doomed as the American IT workers. I was on an ASP project and the project manager bragged about getting off shore programmers to code ASP pages for $7 per hour - just before he canned us all. You see, the H-1Bs have artificial salary protection right now. The employer doesn't dare cut his/her salary while still under sponsorship. So the H-1Bs even have wage protection above-and-beyond American workers!! I'm so ticked right now I could strangle your scrawny unpatriotic pencil neck. Especially if you're one of those upper-caste apartheid racists from India!!

    1. Re:Dear Mamma's Boy by bobalu · · Score: 1

      Listen fool, I'm an American, and don't you say nuthin' about my momma. Read the post. I'm referring to people I work with. They're NOT being paid less. They're NOT off-shore programmers. Get a grip.

      --
      The revolution will NOT be televised.
  331. Indians are begging for the boot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its disgusting to see Indians boast so much. What is there to be proud of when the only job prospects of the graduates of your 'best' universities are in foreign lands?

    In the meantime half of all indian children are malnourished, the country is a cesspool lagging behind almost all other nations in socio-economic indicators.

    Indians, especially the english speaking colonial servant types, are probably the cruelest, most callous bunch of bastards in the world. Ask them next time if they have done ANYTHING to better their own country.

  332. Of course you don't know their net pay (duh!) by ProudVeteran · · Score: 1

    Mr. BS:
    The H-1Bs that you have been so gleefully giving my job to are probably not being paid anywhere near what your American workers are paid.

    Just like all the cheap labor lusting IT managers, you just don't get it. All you see is the GROSS rate charged by your local IT pimp service. You don't see the paltry net rates paid to H-1B subcontractors.

    But you don't care about them just like you don't care about fellow Americans like myself. All you care about is your own greedy little pocket and your own little budget variances. God help our sons and daughters in Iraq if they all had attitudes like yours!

    1. Re:Of course you don't know their net pay (duh!) by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 1

      To me the problem is with the "Local IT Pimp"...We pay top dollar for the service. If the H-1B is only getting a small percentage from his pimp then how is that my fault? Plus the days of getting 50 bucks an hour to "code" HTML died with the .com bust. Much like the people on the assembly lines getting paid 25 bucks an hour in the 70's to plug part A into socket B for 8 hours a day wondered why their jobs went away. Yet our school teachers work for peanuts to do a VERY tough job. And believe me I honor them more than someone who expects 50-80 bucks an hour to sit in an office with a big cup of coffee and headphones to write loops and conditions all day.

      --
      (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
  333. Re:Nothing wrong this this by rdean400 · · Score: 1

    It is apparent that you didn't read it. It clearly puts U.S. productivity near or at the top for the 1990s, which is the most relevent decade for this discussion. If we're talking 50s-80s, then you have a point, but not for the 90s.

  334. Indian H-1Bs hail from racist regime by ProudVeteran · · Score: 1

    Almost all H-1Bs are upper-caste Hindus from the most racist and sexist apartheid regime in the world.

    No wonder IIT does so well. Common Indians will never be admitted - especially lower-caste "untouchables". Yes, upper-caste Hindus hate very dark skinned African-Indians so much that they consdider them "untouchables".

    The NAACP already knows that SUN and other heavily H-1B companies in IT have terrible records for hiring African Americans.

    Lower-caste women are treated like dirt in India. Actually all women are treated like dirt. They can be stoned if they don't submit to arranged marriages.

    So the H-1B program is rewarding racists and sexists.

  335. Re:"US'ians"? HOLY FUCKING SHIT THAT'S LAME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because American could also mean a Mexican or Canadian, for example. YOU IGNORANT IDIOT!

  336. Re:This is why we need to educate Americans for th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most Indian and Chinese make lousy fucking programmers. They have no creativity. The outsourcing phenomenon is being driven by business managers, not technical managers. In time, they'll realize that their costs for outsourcing have actually increased due to constant fucking code rewrites and poor coding performance. Trust me. Been there, done that.

  337. These beggars just cant help bragging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Must be a cultural trait. They keep posting on internet message boards ridiculously exaggerated statistics of how well they are doing in America: how many doctors, motel owners, engineers etc their community has and how their per capita is higher than white americans and so on. But you never hear about these jerks trying to do any good for their own country that they escaped from like rats from a sinking ship.

    The best favor you can do for the starving children of India is to do what the Ugandans did, kick them out....and make sure no other country accepts them. They need to be forced to go back and invest in their OWN country's future.

    I have a feeling that this will happen. And soon.

    1. Re:These beggars just cant help bragging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's alright. When things start getting really tough over here, you'll be finding these H1B visa holders swinging gently in the breeze from the lamp posts along the highway. For better or worse, lynching has a long history in the U.S.

      The visa holders will suddenly gain fond memories of home when that happens.

  338. Upper-caste Hindus are the real RACISTS!! by ProudVeteran · · Score: 1

    Stop playing that phony racism card. I'm a Hispanic-American and Indian H-1Bs treated me like lower-caste dirt.

    The majority of H-1Bs are racist upper-caste Hindu males from India. India's apartheid regime is worse than South Africa's was.

    Other H-1B countries aren't much better. Almost all of them foster some form of racial, sexual, or religious intolerance that is illegal in the US.

    Evidently you believe in preference based on race, religion, and sex - which is exactly what the H-1B program does.

    (You moderators otta think long and hard about this one before you tag this note with a low score. It will bely your own views on racism, sexism, and religious intolerance. Does SLASHDOT support discrimination against African-American techs? Labor statistics already prove that they have been disproportionately displaced by H-1Bs.)

  339. 'Upper-caste' hindus are just as black as others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dont see any difference. The differences are slight and are regional not related to caste. Most brahmins are blacks by international standards. Hindu gods like Rama and Krishna are black too.

    I think it will help to shake them out of their colonial racist self-delusions if they were to be called blacks regulary. You will be doing them a favor...kinda like slapping a hysterical person into sense.

  340. Re:Don't You Get it? Payroll taxes support the US by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    Oh boy! Another phat-dumb-and-happy American ready to bail on his/her fellow Americans - not unlike the power elite who are hiding in Belize to avoid paying US taxes. This is the kind of selfish attitude that is going to doom Americans.

    I'm sorry, but I can't blame him. He's already been sold out by those power elite, and the power elite that is still in power here, at the tops of corporations and government. He's also been sold out by all the common people of this country who stood by and did nothing about the situation, voting in people who made it worse. Our elected leaders, over many years, are to blame for this situation, and we, the people, are to blame for electing these people into power. I can entirely sympathize with him wanting to leave this rapidly imploding society while he still can.

    The same thing happened centuries ago when people left badly-run countries in Europe and elsewhere and came to the US. Most of those places later cleaned house and fixed their problems, but how long did it take? Usually longer than a generation, after lots of people got fed up and left. Why stick around and live in a hellhole for the rest of your life waiting for things to improve (which probably won't happen until long after you're dead, if ever), when you can go someplace better?

  341. Upper Caste Hindus don't care about starving kids by ProudVeteran · · Score: 1

    Upper caste Hindus don't give a rat's ass about starving, malnourished, lower-caste children.

    Other Asian H-1B countries aren't much better.

    We are rewarding the most racist, selfish class of workers in the world with H-1B visas.

  342. Your argument by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is largely correct, but the idea that businesses are trying to become robber barons is childish. They aren't that well thought-out.

  343. Americans misunderstand true apartheid by ProudVeteran · · Score: 1

    Please show me where these "international standards" on skin coloration exist. I'm really curious.

    You are so typical of uneducated Americans. You don't understand the intricacies of the Indian caste system. It isn't solely based on skin tone - there are complex layers of classism that loosely follow skin tones - not unlike the apartheid system in South Africa with it's "Blacks" and "Coloreds". These words mean the same thing to Americans - but they denoted a wholely seperate caste class under their apartheid system.

    So obviously there is no "international standard" regarding skin tone terminology.

    Lower-caste Dalits (Untouchables) in India are decendents of negroid Africans that migrated there centuries ago. They generally are extremely dark skinned and have typical negroid features. They are African-Indians just as Blacks in America are African-American. The only difference is that it happened so long ago (millenia) that skin tones have mixed despite rigid class separation. The Hindus are decendents of ancient light-skinned arian tribes from the North.

    Please ask your Hindu friends how many Dalits (African-Indian "Untouchables") are adimitted at IIT? How many are H-1Bs? Then ask them if they would mind sharing a cubicle with an "Untouchable".

    And, I double-dog dare you to call them Blacks.

    1. Re:Americans misunderstand true apartheid by crazyphilman · · Score: 1

      How ironic! You claim that the person you're replying to is "typical of uneducated Americans". After all (rummaging in the CIA World Fact Book, http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/) India has a literacy level around 56% for males, and 37% for females. The U.S. on the other hand, has a literacy level of 97% for both males AND females. So, uneducated Americans are far less typical than uneducated Indians.

      You're welcome. I love clearing up these little misunderstandings...

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
  344. Bad career choices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You list your skills in terms of programming languages, and then wonder why no one wants you to work for them.

    You sound really bright. You must have thought it through. What's wrong with you and your resume?

    1. Re:Bad career choices by vsync64 · · Score: 1
      My apologies for the bad phrasing. I certainly would not be one to assume that familiarity with a specific language or tool implies cognizance of the entirety of computer science and engineering. Rather, I listed the languages I did (C, Java, and Lisp) in an attempt to show the breadth of my knowledge, my ability to master different paradigms (low-level portable assembly languages, trendy and object-oriented BDSM languages, and (mostly) functional languages), and yes, my mastery of specific languages. Theory means nothing if you can't apply it.

      As I said, I've also become used to HR people disinterested in general knowledge, looking for buzzwords and specific technologies. Hopefully my résumé is a little more generic and abstract (I didn't link to it before simply because I didn't want my post to be interpreted as a simple plea for work, although if anyone has an offer I'd gladly take it), and do I welcome any suggestions.

      I am a rabid advocate of an abstract knowledge base and of personal adaptability; occasionally I forget that this is not widespread and I could be perceived otherwise. In an attempt to mollify your legitimate criticism, therefore, here are the reasons I believe myself to be highly employable:

      Computers aren't just a career to me; they are a passion. Ever since I was a small child I've been fascinated by them. I like to think of myself as a hacker. My dad had a dual-head (CGA and Hercules) XT system when I was 4 or 5, something like that. I was curious how some programs used one and some used another, but he told me I didn't need to worry about that. Exploration led me to MS-DOS's MODE command, and I was hooked.

      My personality type (INTP) means I am naturally drawn to theory and abstract representations, that I want things done "properly". My physics classes were a bit strange, as I wanted the formulas for collisions, rather than drawing them out on a piece of paper and having a 15% margin of error be "acceptable". I just figured it out myself (basic trig) and programmed it into my calculator for good measure. I'm a big fan of automation as well -- most error seems to come from human mistakes -- but only if the operator has a vague idea of what's going on in the guts of the machine (I disagree with Joel Spolsky on a fair number of things, but he's correct with the basic idea of "leaky abstractions".).

      My early BASIC programs shunned GOTO in favor of GOSUB. I then moved to QuickBASIC, then Pascal and C, then stuck to Java for quite a while, always seeking something that would allow me to do things "right" and abstract away the implementational cruft. Eventually I found Common Lisp, and I'm quite happy with it for now; it seems a good blend of the theoretical and the pragmatic. It's also quite useful as I can "backport" what I learn from it into more mainstream languages, if need be.

      I've implemented IRC clients, Web servers, interpreters, simple operating systems, various components of content management systems, and a smorgasbord of small utilities and integration tools. They may seem trivial, but the last are my favorites, simply because they have a tangible effect on the computing experience. Computers are supposed to make our lives easier, and it doesn't do much good if the disparate components have to be hand-massaged into usefulness and handled as discrete cases. In everything I make an effort to adhere to specs, to be platform-agnostic, and to plan for extensibility. This has helped me time and time again: the initial implementation may seem to drag a bit, but adding requested enhancements later is a matter of minutes or hours rather than days or weeks.

      While I don't have an extensive formal training in computer science, I'm not half bad at developing efficient algorithms. At numerous times, I have sped up existing systems 10x or 100x by noticing poorly nested loops or redundant code. I've caught security holes caused by passing tainted strings to the databa

      --
      TO BUY A NEW CAR WOULD MAKE YOU SEXUALLY ATTRACTIVE.
  345. Who are the real RACISTS? by ProudVeteran · · Score: 1

    You are the ultimate in "racist biggot pigshits" if you are defending the largest remaining apartheid regime in the world.

    You're such a petty little chicken shit that you have to post as a COWARD. You're probably just an upper-caste H-1B who can't wait to get back to India and legally flog his lower-caste servants.

  346. Right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How come you keep thinking Indians are smart and well educated.

    Everyone of them has a master's in math from some Indian university, which seems to be less rigorous than 2nd year math at an American university.

    Oh. I guess that makes me racist.

    yeah, these guys do this singy-song english which is like nails on chalkboard. But i'm supposed to tolerate it to be PC? right. Call me racists I guess.

    You really are a dumb MF'er.

  347. So much for customer service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You paid for support in "English". If the person really has poor English then you've got a legitimate complaint. If it's just that you can't make the adjustment to a slightly different dialect from yours then that's your problem."

    No, he paid for support.

    And Sun can probably give him martians from jupiter and claim they're speaking English.

    But as a customer, I'll simply refuse to use Sun support. And if I can't get suppot from Sun *to my satisfaction*, then I might as well pick Microsoft.

    So its a move that will save Sun a few million now and put them out of business in 5.

    Hopefully, you didn't pay too much for that fancy education because you're as well thought out as a typical high-school senior.

    To recap:
    In your view, if I pay for support and I can't understand the support, its my fault because I'm not worldly and accepting enough.

    I honestly honestly can't get over how dumb you are.

  348. Beyond Price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Almost everyone looking at the H-1b issue tends to focus on the simple wages of H-1b workers compared to US engineers. A bigger question here:
    What are the ramifications of going to war in a situation in which much of the technical and financial infrastructure of a country are under the direct control of foreign nationals and other recent immigrants?


    Sun and Oracle are both major military contractors. The larger accounting firms are also major users of H-1b labor.


    We already have at least one example of a major user of H-1b labor, Enron, in which a large amount of fraud took place. Of the $12 Billion stolen from Enron shareholders, at least $3 Billion wound up in India.


    I can think of dozens of ways an enemy of the US government can exploit the current heavy use of H-1b labor in the US. Here you have a lot of guys away from home, with relatives that can be easily threatened(keep in mind about 20% of the Indian population is Muslim).


    At the same time, the H-1b fiasco has made it really clear to US techies that their citizenship rights just didn't count for much compared to political donations(which is how the ITAA companies got that 96-1-3 vote in the US Senate).

  349. Saddam-loving French Canadians by ProudVeteran · · Score: 1

    Ooo. Another supporter of the racist apartheid regime in India. You are supporting racism when you support upper-caste Indians - which is what most of the H-1Bs are.

    I bets ya'll good ole boys in Canada don't want nun of us low class Americans workin' for ya - even though we saved your pussy asses in WWI and WWII.

    You're probably just a sour French-Canadian. Go kiss Saddam's butt with your Frenchie pals.

  350. Re:I am shocked...cuz youre a tard. by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 0, Flamebait


    Like if I said "yanks" instead of "hindus", you'd be crying like you are right now. Uh-huh. Goddamn hippy.

    PLEASE shut the hell up? Please?

    And stop wearing that fucking "petrouli" oil. It makes you smell like like (asscrack and roadkill)^E+99.

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

  351. H-1B is a huge threat to national security by ProudVeteran · · Score: 1

    As an experienced Oracle DBA and programmer I can tell you that the threat posed by foreign H-1B visa workers and foreign off shore workers is huge.

    This is just as dangerous as missiles in Cuba - but since there are no simplistic black-and-white aerial photos our dumbfounded leaders just can't comprehend it.

    I was a contractor at Lockheed Martin just before 09/11 and they had all kinds of foreign contractors. They didn't do any background checks on them. NOTHING. They didn't even have to take a drug test. (Boy, did that ever tick off the LM employees!)

    They could have planted all kinds of encrypted time bombs in guidance systems and what not. Even NASA gives their backdoor passwords to hundreds of foreign nationals. This often happens through third-party subcontracts that they don't even pay attention to. Now it seems that dozens of foreign visa workers were involved with the recent shuttle disaster.

    Imagine if air traffic control systems had simultaneous cyber-attacks? It could make 09/11 seem small in comparison.

    What about power grids? Banking systems? Hospitals? Nuclear plants? EVERYTHING IN OUR NATION IS DEPENDENT ON COMPUTERS!! They all use the same Windows operating systems, which is a hacker's dream come true with it's poorly secured registry and it's plethora of easily hacked dlls. Gee, I didn't even mention its vulnerability to ActiveX objects and COM modules.

    You would be surprised how poorly secured many of our networks and databases are. At Lockheed/Martin the administrators even failed to alter the vendor-supplied default passwords for Oracle databases??!! I also worked at a state government office that was even worse! You could remotely hack into their Oracle database via ODBC - even without a password! (Their Lead Oracle DBA was an H-1B from India. So much for superior tallent.)

    Please take a look at this link. You can read how much the people of India hate us and our war on Iraq.

    http://india_resource.tripod.com/oppositioniraqw ar .html

    Are these the people that you want programming the military and aerospace systems that your son's and dauther's lives depend on? Do you think an Indian off shore programmer, with this hateful attitude towards America, would think twice about taking a $100,000 bribe from Al Quada?

    And what about all of the disgruntled American techs? They have the backdoor passwords too. If just one of us were to snap it could get much worse than somebody "going postal" with a 9mm.

    But saving a couple bucks an hour by screwing fellow Americans out of their jobs is just more important to our corporate elite than national security.

    It will come back to haunt them. It is only a matter of time.

  352. Why all of the hoopla over H1-B? by reekus42 · · Score: 1

    I've been working in the U.S for almost 2 years now, all on TN Visa's. I've had 3 different jobs, I've never been laid off, and I've always been able to find a better oppurtunity. Guess I'm just lucky.

    Maybe I'm missing the point of the whole discussion. Is Sun laying off positions in the U.S and hiring the equivalent position overseas? If that's the case there's not a whole lot that can be done about that is there?

    Or are they laying off positions in the U.S and importing H1-B's to live here in the U.S? That sounds a little shady, but are you surprised by the moves corporations make to save a couple bucks? What would people say if they laid off Americans to replace them with cheaper Americans? I do admire the H1-B recipients for packing up and moving thousands of miles away from their family and friends to try and make a better life for themselves.

    My current employer just went through a round of lay offs, I'm on contract and a visa so I thought I'd be gone for sure. Instead they let a full time person go. Do I feel bad that I'm taking an American job, not really.

    Think of the current times as weeding out those who know from those who don't. If these senior people know what they're doing they shouldn't have a problem finding new work somewhere.

    In any case I think that the world job market should be more like the E.U, being able to work in any coutry without the need for a little piece of paper authorizing said work.

    1. Re:Why all of the hoopla over H1-B? by ProudVeteran · · Score: 1

      For such a superior worker you sure failed to do any research regarding this topic.

      Your patronizing dribble reflects your extreme bias. Would you feel bad about taking that American's job if his sons were going to Iraq to defend your sorry ass?

      Your statement about the EU really shows your ignorance. If you would read the news you would see that Germany is taking measures to REDUCE the number of guest workers from India and elsewhere.

      Once again, we have a shining example of an inferior foreign mind taking jobs from Americans.

    2. Re:Why all of the hoopla over H1-B? by reekus42 · · Score: 1

      To be honest I don't really care that much about the topic. Life goes on if jobs are won or lost. It has and always will. People will still get by. I'd like to experience working in a real foreign country though and right now it takes to much paperwork.

      I'm sick and tired of people blaming immigrant workers for someone else losing their job. I've had family and friends lose their jobs and the first people they blame are immigrants. Does anyone really wanna work for a company that practices that kind of business?

      I haven't seen Iraqi military attacking the land I happen to be occupying, so no one is defending me from anything.

      Do you want to put up a huge wall around your precious country and not let people in or out? Gee, sounds an awful lot like something the communists did. But no, you're nothing like them, you're just protecting yourself, right? Hahahaha. Land of the free indeed.

  353. a fundamental perspective difference by Stu+Charlton · · Score: 1

    There's a lot of divergent opinion about H1-B's. I think it comes down to a philosophy of what corporations responsible for, i.e. what is the purpose of a business?

    One side suggests that business is responsible for job creation. But this is no better than the school of thought that says business' sole responsibility is to make a profit. It's a chicken-and-egg argument: companies don't make money, companies make shoes.

    Another side suggets that business is responsible to its customers, i.e. to the market. Businesses exist solely to create customers. To fill needs for the market in an economically efficient manner, measured by profit.

    If it's about serving consumers, globally, then arguably labour force should be global as well.

    I don't think H1-B's are a bad thing, as they represent the "free movement of labour". ABUSE of H1-B's is rampant, and must be curtailed, but the laws as-is are fair.

    Let's also not forget that NAFTA has effectively created a "North American Free-Trade-Labour Zone" with the TN-1 VISA program. University graduate Canadians and Mexicans can work in the U.S. at ANY TIME, for an UNLIMITED (yearly-renewed) amount of time. This is the direction of American policy -- freer trade in goods, services, and labour. IS it really a bad thing?

    My bias is that I was Canadian under a TN-1 visa in the U.S. for 3 years, along with several of my collegues from university. We certainly weren't underpaid (if low 6 figures in California and NYC is underpaid). And the main reason people hired us was because management felt we were better educated and offered a better value than comparable U.S. citizens that they could find.

    I don't know if they were lying, but that's the jist of what I hear from people wanting to use Indian H1B's and offshore development. Indians are educated almost as well as Americans, and sometimes better -- why not use them? It's about a combination of money and skill. Companies are going to make a tradeoff among that continuum to hit the right sweet spot.

    Offshore has a host of problems relating to communications and hence will probably not work beyond narrow projects with slowly changing needs or requirements. The timezone difference, communication gap, and cultural differences make for a very difficult collaboration. This makes H1B programs palatable.

    Protecting labour markets is a long history in the U.S., and there's a lot of inconsistency in it. I would suggest that markets will be protected or opened based on which group has the most local political power -- the farmers, the unions, etc. on one hand, or the technology lobby groups on the other hand. But the general policy of the past 2 administrations has been "freer labour trade".... and I'm not sure that's going to change.

    --
    -Stu
  354. Great Point! Let's do it before we're all broke. by ProudVeteran · · Score: 1

    Boycotts are one of our only remaining weapons in the battle for the welfare of our families and friends - some of whom now have relatives at war in Iraq.

    There are many companies to boycott which have shown preference to hiring workers from less-than-friendly nations over skilled Americans:

    American Express
    Bank of India...er, I mean America
    Motorola
    Hewlett Packard
    Intel
    Microsoft
    IBM

    Heck, we'd have to boycott darn near everything. BUT, if we target just one company at a time we might have an impact. Some of these companies are worse than others. I threw away all of my American Express cards. Regardless of their preference for off shore and H-1B workers, I don't like the thought of having foreign nationals looking at my balances and personal information. They could easily steal my identity (and money!) and the FBI and local law enforcement couldn't do a thing about it. (I sure saved myself a bundle in annual service charges too.)

    Just say "NO" to products from companies who are exploiting foreign workers at the expense of American taxpayers' jobs!

  355. Whay are you so dramatic? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    There are thousends of fullfilling occupations out there, you people always make it appear like the alternatives are starvation and flipping that pseudo-meat that goes into the BMs.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  356. this makes me sad. by LifesABeach · · Score: 0

    sun, say ain't so. :(

  357. $16.5 BILLION in lost payroll taxes ! by ProudVeteran · · Score: 1

    To be honest I don't really care that much about the topic. Life goes on
    if jobs are won or lost.


    Ah, to hear the words of a caring fellow American (I assume). Let's see though,
    if there are roughly 1 million H-1B and L-1 workers (there are actually more)
    and only half of them avoid payroll taxes, including FICA, Medicare, FUTA, State
    and Local, etc., let's do the math. We will assume that they have displaced
    American technicians earning an average of only $75k per year.

    The combined payroll tax percentages for a taxpayer in this bracket would roughly
    be as follows:

    Federal: 20 percent

    FICA: 15 percent (remember the matching contribution by the employer - which
    is also lost)

    Medicare (included in FICA percentage)

    State 6 percent (this is low for states like California)

    FUTA 2 percent (the employer pays this one too - but it will also be lost)

    Local City/County 1 percent (once again, this is low for some areas)

    Combined Payroll Tax percentage = 44 percent

    Please remember that much of this burden is paid for by the employer - which
    has a lot to do with why they hate American Payroll taxes and love foreign employees.

    Now let's calculate:

    $75,000 x .44 = $33,000 in lost annual payroll tax revenue per displaced American
    taxpayer

    500,000 x $33,000 = $16.5 BILLION in lost payroll tax revenue PER YEAR !!!
    Yes, it's BILLIONS in lost tax revenue!
    Is it no wonder that our governments
    are running deficits at every level?

    So any American that ignores this situation is either very mathematically challenged
    or a complete buffoon.


    I haven't seen Iraqi military attacking the land I happen to be occupying,
    so no one is defending me from anything.

    Talk about an unpatriotic attitude as our sons and daughters march into
    harm's way. Evidently 09/11 was just another ho-hum day for you.

  358. French-Loving Canadian hypocrites by ProudVeteran · · Score: 1

    Smug words coming from a comfy Canadian whose own country protects it's "labour force" much more staunchly than America.

    Can I waltz into Canada to steal a job at any old time on something like a TN visa? Hell no!

    And now you French-lovering Canadians don't even have to send your sons and daughters to war. Our sons and daughters are risking their lives for your safety too!

    1. Re:French-Loving Canadian hypocrites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give it a rest you frickin redneck. You arent risking your lives (its a cakewalk) for anyone other than israelis.

      Face it, you are dumb as shit and out of your league in this profession. No one owes you anything.

    2. Re:French-Loving Canadian hypocrites by mgb2002 · · Score: 1

      Actually, you can. The TN program works both ways. Americans who meet the requirements can work in Canada just as Canadians can in the U.S.

  359. My Bad. I meant "uninformed" Americans by ProudVeteran · · Score: 1

    It was late. I'm a an American myself - maybe not so well educated either (only a BSCS).

    Actually I pretty much agree with the other comment, and I meant to use the phrase "uninformed Americans" because it really is amazing how many of US believe that upper-caste Hindus are Blacks. This is no more correct than calling dark brown skinned Latinos "Blacks". I'm also surprised at how few Americans realize there is an upper-caste apartheid minority in control of India, with class lines drawn by race and religion. The antithesis of our own constitution.

    THANK YOU for printing the education statistics. This proves my point perfectly. Minorities (lower-caste citizens) and women are treated like dirt in India - not much differently than the Taliban; and actually worse than countries like Iraq and Iran.

  360. Re:My Bad. I meant "uninformed" Americans by crazyphilman · · Score: 1

    I'm glad you turned out to be an American, and that you weren't basically saying Americans were uneducated... Actually I found most of your post fairly informative. Interesting stuff.

    I agree with you about India's internal organization. I sure wouldn't want to be a part of that society. Interesting note: did you know that Indians consider ALL foreigners to be untouchables? That's you and me. Untouchables. Kind of eliminates any lingering desire to visit there, doesn't it?

    --
    Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
  361. Faulty Logic re US Payroll Taxes & H-1B / L-1 by ProudVeteran · · Score: 1

    My logic isn't faulty at all, but you're missing the entire point. This is not about tax revenue at all; it's about personal income for those in power. If they can make more money by pandering to big corporations, then they don't really care about the lack of payroll taxes and the resulting deficits.

    Obviously you don't understand our democratic system. Our politicians, as well as corporate leaders, will eventually care about resulting deficits.

    You should be careful not to let your anger and hatred cloud your view of others. I can't imagine what made you think I was an H1B from my post; it should have been obvious that it was a complete slam against the rich politicians in power showing how they'd sell out the people they serve so they can become richer.

    My family is at financial risk as well as at risk from war. I've got plenty of reason for my anger. Your blatant H-1B bias combined with an antiestablishment undertone (rich politicians in power), along with atrocious grammar, betrayed your foreign origins. Are you an H-1B? If so, from where?

    Perhaps these numbers will help explain why our rich politicians in power can't ignore payroll tax revenue...

    Let's see, if there are roughly 1 million H-1B and L-1 workers (there are actually more) and only half of them avoid payroll taxes, including FICA, Medicare, FUTA, State and Local, etc., let's do the math. We will assume that they have displaced American technicians earning an average of only $75k per year.The combined payroll tax percentages for a taxpayer in this bracket would roughly be as follows:

    Federal: 20 percent
    FICA: 15 percent (remember the matching contribution by the employer - which is also lost)
    Medicare (included in FICA percentage)
    State 6 percent (this is low for states like California)
    FUTA 2 percent (the employer pays this one too - but it will also be lost)
    Local City/County 1 percent (once again, this is low for some areas)

    Combined Payroll Tax percentage = 44 percent

    Please remember that much of this burden is paid for by the employer - which has a lot to do with why they hate American Payroll taxes and love foreign employees.

    Now let's calculate:
    $75,000 x .44 = $33,000 in lost annual payroll tax revenue per displaced American taxpayer

    500,000 x $33,000 = $16.5 BILLION in lost payroll tax revenue PER YEAR!!!

    Yes, it's BILLIONS in lost tax revenue! Is it no wonder that our governments are running deficits at every level?
    So any American that ignores this situation is either very mathematically challenged...or a complete buffoon.

  362. Vulgar H-1B Coward hates Americans by ProudVeteran · · Score: 1

    Evidently you're another H-1B worker posting as an Anonymous Coward.

    So you hate Americans so much that you consider the war in Iraq a "cakewalk" for our sons and daughters??!!

    Talk about a redneck!!!

    Obviously it is high time we expelled ALL foreign guest workers - ASAP. Especially those who are limited to a foul, un-Christian, four-letter-word vocabulary.

  363. Threat by H-1B visa workers at nuke plant by ProudVeteran · · Score: 1

    It still amazes me. We have a bigger threat than nuclear missiles in Cuba - right in our own backyard - and nobody wants to do anything about it.

    Did you know that APS (Palo Verde Nuclear plant in Phoenix) employs dozens of foreign guest workers under the H-1B visa program? Theses foreigners from less-than-friendly countries like China, India, and Pakistan have been given access to the computer networks that control the Palo Verde nuclear plant. Our leaders have given the backdoor passwords to foreign nationals who are here on visas similar to those used by the 09/11 terrorists.

    In today's highly technical world it is naïve to think that terrorism will always be wrought by gun toting, knife wielding terrorists in a violent fashion. Our computer networks are extremely vulnerable. The Palo Verde nuclear plant is fully dependent on computers in every aspect.

    In Pakistan and India, where most of the H-1B workers come from, upwards of 90 percent of the population despise America and the war with Iraq. Even the India Times, which is very pro-American, conservatively reports that 87 percent oppose Bush and America. Both India and China have now joined in condemning our military actions.

    Do you think these foreign nonimmigrant workers might be more willing to accept a bribe from Al Qaeda? Foreign visa holders have worked on virtually all of our military computer systems via companies like Lockheed/Martin, Boeing, and others. Often work is done by foreign computer programmers that the defense contractor doesn't know about - via third party contracts. Foreign cyber terrorists have had ample opportunity to infect our military guidance and/or peripheral software and hardware. The lives of our sons and daughters in Iraq depend on these systems. Does it bother you that our leaders have allowed foreigners to work on these systems - often with nary a background check?

    Most of you realize that computers are very complicated and susceptible to viruses and bugs. When a foreign programmer is given full access to a computer network, the potential harm increases a hundred fold. He/she no longer needs to hack into the system since they are given the backdoor passwords. This is kind of like giving the key to the hen house to the fox. This open access affords them unlimited resources and time to implant encrypted time bombs. These bombs would be virtually impossible to detect within the menagerie of the Windows operating systems. When they "explode" the cyber terrorist could be safe and sound back in his/her home country. They wouldn't even have to risk their life to kill thousands of Americans.

  364. Poor little H-1B loving Mamma's Boy... by ProudVeteran · · Score: 1

    Don't brag about being an American - after giving away who knows how many jobs to foreign workers - and call ME a fool.

    How patriotic can it be to support foreign workers at a time like this. My nephew is in Iraq and he wants to become a software engineer. But he sees that new grads aren't getting hired because of unpatriotic IT managers such as yourself.

  365. Re:Bad career choices fnord FNORD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    fnord? fnord is evaporated herbal tea without the herbs. fnord is that funny feeling you get when you reach for the Snickers bar and come back holding a slurpee. fnord is the 43 1/3rd state, next to Wyoming. fnord is this really, really tall mountain. fnord is the reason boxes of condoms carry twelve instead of ten. fnord is the blue stripes in the road that never get painted. fnord is place where those socks vanish off to in the laundry. fnord is an arcade game like Pacman without the little dots. fnord is a little pufflike cloud you see at 5pm. fnord is the tool the dentist uses on unruly patients. fnord is the blank paper that cassette labels are printed on. fnord is where the buses hide at night.
    fnord is the empty pages at the end of the book. fnord is the screw that falls from the car for no reason. fnord is why Burger King uses paper instead of foam. fnord is the little green pebble in your shoe. fnord is the orange print in the yellow pages. fnord is a pickle without the bumps. fnord is why ducks eat trees. fnord is toast without bread. fnord is a venetian blind without the slats. fnord is the lint in the navel of the mites that eat the lint in the navel of the mites that eat the lint in fnord's navel.
    fnord is an apostrophe on drugs.
    fnord is the bucket where they keep the unused serifs for H*lvetica.
    fnord is the gunk that sticks to the inside of your car's fenders.
    fnord is the source of all the zero bits in your computer.
    fnord is the echo of silence.
    fnord is the parsley on the plate of life.
    fnord is the sales tax on happiness.
    fnord is the preposition at the end of sixpence.
    fnord is the feeling in your brain when you hold your breath too long.
    fnord is the reason latent homosexuals stay latent.
    fnord is the donut hole. fnord is the whole donut.
    fnord is an annoying series of email messages.
    fnord is the color only blind people can see.
    fnord is the serial number on a box of cereal.
    fnord is the Universe with decreasing entropy.
    fnord is a naked woman with herpes simplex 428.
    fnord is the yin without yang.
    fnord is a pyrotumescent retrograde onyx obelisk.
    fnord is why lisp has so many parentheses.
    fnord is the the four-leaf clover with a missing leaf.
    fnord is double-jointed and has a cubic spline.
    fnord never sleeps. fnord is the "een" in baleen whale.
    fnord is neither a particle nor a wave. fnord is the space in between the pixels on your screen.
    fnord is the guy that writes the Infiniti ads.
    fnord is the nut in peanut butter and jelly.
    fnord is an antebellum flagellum fella.
    fnord is a sentient vacuum cleaner.
    fnord is the smallest number greater than zero.
    fnord lives in the empty space above a decimal point.
    fnord is the odd-colored scale on a dragon's back.
    fnord is the redundant coin slot on arcade games.
    fnord was last seen in Omaha, Nebraska.
    fnord is the founding father of the phrase "founding father".
    fnord is the last bit of sand you can't get out of your shoe.
    fnord is Jesus's speech advisor.
    fnord keeps a spare eyebrow in his pocket.
    fnord invented the green hubcap.
    fnord is why doctors ask you to cough.
    fnord is the "ooo" in varooom of race cars.
    fnord uses two bathtubs at once.

    I cannot escape them

    No matter how I try
    They wait for me everywhere
    I cannot pass them by.
    Driving down the street
    I see "Jesus Is Lord"
    And then immediately after
    I hear the word "FNORD!"
    I