Slashdot Mirror


Bill Gates Gives $20M to CMU for New Building

touretzky writes "Carnegie Mellon University announced on Tuesday that The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation had donated $20 million toward the cost of a new building to be called the "Gates Center for Computer Science". Some faculty have suggested that in acknowledgment of Mr. Gates' profound influence on the computer software industry, the building should be painted bright blue."

919 comments

  1. Before you ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes, the building will have Windows, but the Office will cost extra.

    1. Re:Before you ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      And plenty of back doors.

    2. Re:Before you ask by oskard · · Score: 2, Funny

      The entrance will say "Press any key to continue_"

      --
      Sigs are for Terrorists.
    3. Re:Before you ask by baywulf · · Score: 5, Funny

      And whenever ask someone for help inside the building the paperclips start dancing.

    4. Re:Before you ask by freakmn · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...and the exit will say start...

      --
      warning: This post is likely to contain gobs of dripping sarcasm. Consume at your own risk.
    5. Re:Before you ask by SphericalCrusher · · Score: 1

      Yeah. And their tables and chairs will all be messing one leg -- it'll stand, but somethings just make it harder to use and to work with...

      --
      "Instant gratification takes too long." - Carrie Fisher
    6. Re:Before you ask by superpulpsicle · · Score: 0

      - There will be no security in the building.

      - Your windows and office will need to be patched everyday.

      - The wealthier customers will have special access in the building.

      - After everything is paid for, you will need to have a subscription just because.

      - You'll need new version of windows every year.

    7. Re:Before you ask by polecat_redux · · Score: 1

      Has anyone here ever seen the movie Antitrust?
      http://www.nsa.gov/museum/museu00029.cfm

    8. Re:Before you ask by polecat_redux · · Score: 1

      wow, a reason for me to not be an idiot with HTML...
      Great Seal

    9. Re:Before you ask by tiredwired · · Score: 5, Funny

      And it is going to look just like a building Apple built 5 years ago.

    10. Re:Before you ask by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 2, Funny

      -If you get injured, you can visit Dr. Watson -The executive floor will have a terrace called Outlook -The employee lounge will have a small balcony called Outlook Express

    11. Re:Before you ask by scum-e-bag · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...and it shall henceforth be known as the BBOD (Blue Building of Death)

      --
      Does it go on forever?
    12. Re:Before you ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder how that Works.

    13. Re:Before you ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you don't know fear until you have a ten foot tall paperclip breathing down your neck.

    14. Re:Before you ask by Cylix · · Score: 0

      Everyone who comes on to campus will be forced to enter the building as tickets will come bundled with their text books.

      The new penguin building is expected shortly after the MS building.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    15. Re:Before you ask by mattjb0010 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ctrl-Alt-Delete is the key combination for the front door

    16. Re:Before you ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Once you're inside you have to push the door marked ENTRY to get out.

    17. Re:Before you ask by Forbman · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...and no discernable security systems, and only one person at a time can enter and use the building at one time.

    18. Re:Before you ask by Forbman · · Score: 1

      ...and every version or another will change all the glass doors (big windows) from swinging inward to swinging outward, or changing which side they swing from, just because some hotshot user interface designer has determined that doors that pivot inward on the right-hand side are better than doors that pivot outward from the left-hand side, etc. (but they did something similar the last time also), and call it all "innovation".

    19. Re:Before you ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And there will be many structural flaws they try to patch. But no one will apply the band-aids.

    20. Re:Before you ask by strider44 · · Score: 1

      But since the apple building merged with the unix building, there's only two buildings. The Microsoft building and the Everyone Else building.

    21. Re:Before you ask by 0racle · · Score: 1

      Your aware thats not as funny as you think it is when you think about it.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    22. Re:Before you ask by jamarsa · · Score: 1

      Sure it will have big 'Gates' in the front...

    23. Re:Before you ask by commodoresloat · · Score: 3, Funny

      ... and standard building maintenance will include completely powering down all the electricity in the building and then powering it back up again at random intervals.

    24. Re:Before you ask by Volmarias · · Score: 1

      It will have an uptime of roughly two hours to two days of use, depending on which contractor constructed it, after which it will crash and have to be rebuilt.

    25. Re:Before you ask by Arial+Sharon,+10pt. · · Score: 0, Insightful

      What the fuck are you talking about? My Windows XP workstation has at least a month of uptime. I have Visual fucking Studio sessions that have been running for far, far longer than two days.

      --
      Am I dead yet?
    26. Re:Before you ask by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Funny

      "The new penguin building is expected shortly after the MS building. "

      Shortly? It'll take 4 years for the tenants to finish building it!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    27. Re:Before you ask by DenDave · · Score: 2, Funny

      I have Visual fucking Studio sessions that have been running for far, far longer than two days. Can we watch?

      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
    28. Re:Before you ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For $20 million they could have supplied all the libraries in the world with a cd copy of openoffice. I wonder why they didn't do that?

    29. Re:Before you ask by ezzewezza · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but if they're gentoonants, it'll take them 12 years!

    30. Re:Before you ask by njvic · · Score: 3, Funny

      20M? Surely 640K would be enough?

    31. Re:Before you ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he can have the name on the building but the servers will run Linux!

    32. Re:Before you ask by samorris · · Score: 1
      Shortly? It'll take 4 years for the tenants to finish building it!

      4 years is a rather precise estimate for something as subjective as "to finish"...

    33. Re:Before you ask by theguyfromsaturn · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, but they won't be "tenants" but the real owners of the building. Each will bring a few bricks or a bag of cement to participate in the collective construction. And everybody will be allowed to add extensions and new wings to the building. It will be a pleasant mix of the gothic cathedral, and more than a little sprinkling of the mauresque bazaar. And let's not forget a little touch of the IKEA mansion.

      --
      I like my dinosaurs feathery, and my pterosaurs hairy (or is it pycnofibery?)
    34. Re:Before you ask by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      Why do you guys make fun of this generous person anyway? He's donating $20 million of his money to construct a building at a university. If anything we should be praising him for his philanthropy. You may not like his methods, but he's certainly a kind, generous person at heart. Well, at least his wife is since I believe she's the one that controls the Gates Foundation allotments.

      Honestly though, where would we be without Bill Gates? Windows brought computing to the average person and it shows. Microsoft doesn't have the largest market share in the world because they produce an inferior product that nobody wants, hell, people run to the stores to upgrade when a new version comes out and desperately try to get on beta programs to see what new goodies are coming down the pike. I think, deep down, we're all just a little jealous of this great man for his success in life.

    35. Re:Before you ask by ammie · · Score: 1

      But first, we will have to STEAL a building....

      --
      {...reality is wrong, Dreams are for real...}
    36. Re:Before you ask by Ingolfke · · Score: 5, Funny

      So true. And actually there will be three buildings built only one used. They'll start with a single design, but a left handed architect will decide that they really should have a doorknobs for left handed people so he'll copy the plans, rework all of them for left handed folks and start his own building project.

      Once the contractors are brought into the picture they'll wage a holy war over which building materials are the best. The original design will be built in steel b/c it's such a robust and flexible choice. One of contractors will completely reject the rigid structure steel requires you to work in, instead he'll choose a more flexible material, clay, because he used that once to make this wonderful outdoor grille. The left handed building will use brick b/c they're different and don't want to be mainstream.

      The tenets will show up to help build the building b/c, this is a community project right. 98% of the tenets will walk around the construction site complaining about how nothing is done and how this and that need to be changed. Occassionaly people will jump in by building out their offices, or enhancing the restroom facilities near their office.

      After 6 months a sign will go up announcing the completion of the project in 3 weeks. After another 6 months the sign has will still be there. 3 years later the clay project will have fallen in on itself several times, eventually becoming a worthless pile of unsightly clay. The left handed building will be completed, and will be loved by all left handed people, but will never be used by the faculty who tend to be mostly right handed. Teh left handed building will gain no mainstream acceptance. The steel building will be completed as well. Unfortunately it is the most sterile unsightly building you've ever seen. Minimilism could learn a thing or two from this building. There are no electrical outlets in the offices, only bare wires that "allow you to interface directly with the electrical module". Nice feature.

      The residents of the Gates building have been watching for four years while these building were built. They'll talk about how much more robust steel is and how they wish they had more of it in their building. They'll talk about how nice the brick is, and the left handed tenets will dream of a day when they'll get left handed doors and talk about banding together and migrating all at once. Several people will talk about all of the space over in the steel building, but will complain that the tenets are hard to talk to because they're always fixing things in their building and all that manual labor makes the whole building wreak of sweat, the hygeine habit of the steel building's tenets is generally questioned. One of the women complain that when she went over to the steel building and asked to use the restroom, she was pointed an empty room, when she asked why the room was empty she was met w/ a nasty look and a sharp "Hey it's free lady! Build it yourself. We can't do everything for you... newbies."

      Slashdot - News and commentary on par w/ CBS

    37. Re:Before you ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes lots and lots of backdoors =]

    38. Re:Before you ask by roror · · Score: 1

      The building is going to cost 50M. They will need to raise fund from other sources.

    39. Re:Before you ask by u-235-sentinel · · Score: 1

      ...and it shall henceforth be known as the BBOD (Blue Building of Death)

      You realize Microsoft will be calling for the rights to that ... unless they have copyrighted it already of course :-)

      --
      Has Comcast disconnected your Internet account? Same here. You can read about it at http://comcastissue.blogspot.com
    40. Re:Before you ask by scum-e-bag · · Score: 1

      Damn. I hope they don't send their lawyers after me. I'm probably on some RIAA/MPAA list now... :)

      --
      Does it go on forever?
    41. Re:Before you ask by HokieJP · · Score: 1

      While your story is funny, I would've wanted to kill myself significantly less while reading it if the people who occupy the buildings had been referred to as 'tenants'. 'tenets' are beliefs.

      Also, things that smell badly 'reek'. to 'wreak' means to cause something, like havoc.

    42. Re:Before you ask by Ingolfke · · Score: 1

      Deer sir,

      I am very sorry if I lead you to any pain or personnel discomfort. Please, now that I feal you're pain to. That is know lye.

      Succinctly,
      Amanwho Kantspell

    43. Re:Before you ask by PastaLover · · Score: 2, Informative

      Copyright is automatic whenever you write something down. You probably mean trademarking.

    44. Re:Before you ask by danimrich · · Score: 1

      and nearly burglars and spies will enter the building via the terrace

      --
      where's all that Karma?
    45. Re:Before you ask by u-235-sentinel · · Score: 1

      Copyright is automatic whenever you write something down. You probably mean trademarking.

      Oops.. Yes. My mistake :-)

      --
      Has Comcast disconnected your Internet account? Same here. You can read about it at http://comcastissue.blogspot.com
    46. Re:Before you ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, the sick building syndrome will be impossible to cure...

    47. Re:Before you ask by Krondor · · Score: 1

      NOOO you missed the beginning totally. Steve Jobs will build a different building in a different part of the world. Bill will steal the blueprints, and after the engineers redesign the whole thing, it will work out pretty much like you laid out above.

  2. Poor Bill by JPM+NICK · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Even when he tries to do something nice, he gets flamed. The man just donated 20 million to the school. give him a break

    1. Re:Poor Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      at least he wasnt shot out of a chimney when a monstrous little girl sneezed!

    2. Re:Poor Bill by vishmaster · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You have to remember Bill is first a Businessman and then a Philanthropist - What bill is indulging here is what is known as Social Investing - Heres how he makes up for the 20mil he spends - 1.Inculcate the 'Microsoft Culture' into the every Person/Animal/THing that ever steps into that building - 2.Set up a future harvesting ground for hiring into his empire when the time is right. Now that they have already been taught the 'Microsoft way' 3.Spread the good word about Microsoft - 20mil worth of marketing does not seem to have the same effect. and yes.. 4.Maybe help the academic community actually grow - PROVIDED - its in the 'Microsoft Way' Not so Poor After all Bill.

      --
      ..And the people bowed and prayed, To the neon gods they made.
    3. Re:Poor Bill by Epistax · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sorry I just can't let "poor Bill" get past everyone. Once again, he used the word "Poor" to describe "Bill". Where "Poor" does have many meanings, I feel that he is so overwhelmingly not "Poor" in one definition as to completely knock out all others from the ballpark.

      That being said the best gifts are the anonymous ones. When it's not anonymous, sure, he's giving $20 million and that's great, but he's it at least partly for his name. Still, I'm not complaining that he's doing it.

    4. Re:Poor Bill by DAldredge · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Well, if he would donate money with out strings that force those that take the money to have close ties to microsoft it would be different. The thing is, most of his donations are designed to sell/push microsoft products and yes that includes the donations to the birth control/gun control/child murders he gives support to.

    5. Re:Poor Bill by smittyoneeach · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Also, there is
      Established in 1988, the CERT® Coordination Center (CERT/CC) is a center of Internet security expertise, located at the Software Engineering Institute, a federally funded research and development center operated by Carnegie Mellon University.
      Now, if 20,000 large doesn't freshen your breath to CERT, dunno what will.
      If you don't like the news, buy the press.
      Maybe these were distortion-free dollars, or something...
      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    6. Re:Poor Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      at least when i pay taxes to the government, i have a certain amount, just a little, control on how and where that money is spent.

      when a company like microsoft steals and rewrites history, orwellian style, shit, I'd rather pay taxes .

    7. Re:Poor Bill by SB5 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You know whats great about CMU? Its got a very large anti-Microsoft culture. But when Microsoft comes to town for recruitment day, its the largest turnout ever.

      --
      If what you are reading sounds funny, or sarcastic, lame, or stupid
      it is because it is supposed to be. just laugh
    8. Re:Poor Bill by supmylO · · Score: 1
      Bill Gates giving away twenty million is like me giving away four cents.
      </bullshit math>

    9. Re:Poor Bill by brilinux · · Score: 3, Informative

      I was actually at the party to celebrate his gift yesterday at Newell-Simon (the free food force overcame the Anti-Bill Gates force), and through talking to people, I had actually heard that it would be named after Turing, but I guess that is something else. The problem is, though, this guy is really rich, and yet he gave only $20,000,000 of the $50,000,000 required for the building, meaning that they need to raise $30,000,000 from other people for a building that will be named after someone else. I hope that they succeed, because it would be nice to see yet another construction project on campus, but it seems rude not to give more for something named after him.

    10. Re:Poor Bill by aixou · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Do we have to dissect every good thing that people do?

      Let's dissect some other things:

      your mom doesn't really love you for you, she loves you because of how you make her feel.

      The fireman who saves you in the building is really only doing it because he wants his buddies to call him a hero.

      Someone who gives a homeless person a dollar is only doing it because they don't want to get shot by the homeless man.

      Your fiancee is only marrying you because she doesn't want to have to be self-sufficient.

      and finally: Stallman does what he does to impress the ladies. ;)

      Can't we just let people do good things sometimes? There is always some element of selfishness in every good deed we do. Let it go. It's a win win situation. Bill gives a great contribution to a school, and he gets to pimp himself a little. so the fuck what.

    11. Re:Poor Bill by Shea_Butter · · Score: 1

      How did we go from philanthropy to trolling about various social issues? I half expect the next post here to say something like "the nazis are cool!" Honestly if you have political fights to pick this probably isn't the best place or way to start them. There's always someone who believes the exact opposite of you...

    12. Re:Poor Bill by DrEldarion · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's how everything is. People always hate the big guy until they get a chance to be a part.

      You can see the same thing with anti-American sentiment in other countries - people will be very quick to badmouth the US, but start giving out free plane tickets and you'll get mobbed.

    13. Re:Poor Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because devry is a shit school with no credibility. always has been, always will be.

    14. Re:Poor Bill by tftp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A thief steals your car and then offers you one free ride. Should you be grateful or angry?

    15. Re:Poor Bill by whoppers · · Score: 2, Insightful

      20 million from a school that provides him with the means to make 200 million each year and he likely charges 2 million each year for software licensing, not including the students/sheep that purchse MS products.

      He'll get a break from me when he creates a quality product for a quality price.

    16. Re:Poor Bill by linguae · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree. I hope this isn't troll/flamebait, but I'm ready to burn some karma, so here it goes....

      Bill Gates may be one of the founders and leaders of a certain company that we all know and love [microsoft.com], and there is a lot of things that I don't like about Microsoft (Windows, convicted monopoly, business practices) but Gates himself is an interesting person. He started out as a geek like most of us here. He also does a lot of good things, like donate to schools, AIDS and cancer research, and other charity organizations. Now, I don't like the way that he has ran Microsoft, but I feel that it is important in some cases to separate Gates and his organization from MS. Gates may be "evil," but I think that he shouldn't be flamed for helping out or his donations; not everything he does is a part of an evil plan for M$ to take over the world.

    17. Re:Poor Bill by Knytefall · · Score: 1

      The free food was sort of shitty, for a $20M gift. It was just random cheese and vegetables, and some cookies. MS does better when they come to campus to recruit... and the CS department does better in general (free beer on the last couple Fridays!!!)

      The strong anti-M$ sentiment on campus should make for plenty of jokes and pranks after this thing gets built. I'm looking forward to seeing the graffiti =)

    18. Re:Poor Bill by brilinux · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I ended up having to go to the O that night to get a real meal, since all I basically could have was cheese, so I left when I was done eating instead of listening to the people talk. I too cannot wait for the ground-breaking; it will be quite entertaining to watch all the hacks that people pull off. I cannot wait for the "Gates ph34rs Gates" sign like that "Gates ph34rs Wean" sign that appeared last time.

    19. Re:Poor Bill by freakmn · · Score: 1
      That being said the best gifts are the anonymous ones. When it's not anonymous, sure, he's giving $20 million and that's great, but he's it at least partly for his name. Still, I'm not complaining that he's doing it.
      This coming from someone posting with a valid username, not as an Anonymous Coward! Does that mean that your gift of a comment is now worth less?

      /friendly ribbing
      --
      warning: This post is likely to contain gobs of dripping sarcasm. Consume at your own risk.
    20. Re:Poor Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some actions are more selfish than others.

      The actions you list are much less selfish than $20M of marketing for 30 odd years to a prime demographic.

      M$ knows that mindshare is everything and here the next generation of computer scientists are being inculcated with M$ commercial propaganda.

    21. Re:Poor Bill by tchdab1 · · Score: 1

      Whose $20M is he donating?

    22. Re:Poor Bill by appleLaserWriter · · Score: 1

      The problem is, though, this guy is really rich, and yet he gave only $20,000,000 of the $50,000,000 required for the building, meaning that they need to raise $30,000,000 from other people for a building that will be named after someone else.

      Actually, it is very smart to bring other donors into the project. More donors mean more people who are stakeholders in the continuing success of the university.

      I'm not a huge fan of the man's software but his philanthropic efforts outside of the tech industry are impressive.

    23. Re:Poor Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it is because people dislike Microsoft's business practices. People believe that Microsoft has killed off software companies due to predatory contracts and thus have concentrated the industry into one company. These same people distrust large corporations.

      On the other hand, CS majors want a job whether it be at Microsoft or elsewhere. Sure you can say "Stick to your beliefs" but when you're stuck between working for a corrupt corporation or living on the streets, what would you do?

    24. Re:Poor Bill by kilgortrout · · Score: 1

      This guy is worth 30 billion dollars. He's at least in a 30% tax bracket so he recieves a tax break of 6 million on his charitable gift so his net giving is really more like 14 million. $14 million is about 0.05% of his net worth. So his gift is equivalent to a person with a net worth of $1 million dollars giving a gift of $500. Big woo!!! He's still a greedy pig IMHO.

    25. Re:Poor Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no, no! This is just credit where credit is due! The building should be painted blue for no other reason than the fact that he has immortalized the BSOD. For years now, poeple have been inculcated with the idea that software must break; it cannot be written so that it doesn't break.

      This is true only in Bill Gates' world. If it makes him rich enough to donate money for buildings, fine. But let's not forget the price everyone else pays for that! Paint it blue.

    26. Re:Poor Bill by Daneurysm · · Score: 1

      while it's nowhere near the same scale--be it on the econonics side or the intentions side--but please--somebody, moderate this up to +5...very insightful.

      Human nature can be boiled-down and disected into billions of little pieces, but...shit, man...when do YOU stop being a machine and start being human....and when do THEY stop being human are start being machine?

    27. Re:Poor Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      but Gates himself is an interesting person. He started out as a geek like most of us here.

      Not quite, he started life as a Biz geek, which we all know are Evil Scum(tm).

    28. Re:Poor Bill by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      You forgot 5: immortality. Since it appears that real immortality won't be discovered any time in the near future, Bill has to console himself in the way that the rich have been doing for centuries, by building statues/buildings/foundations with their names attached to it. So while he's almost certainly wormfood, his name will live on.

      It makes me wonder if this practice will continue once actual immortality becomes a reality. I sincerely hope I'll be around to observe the results, but like Bill I'm not holding my breath.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    29. Re:Poor Bill by log2.0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I consider myself to be a bit anti-american. If I have the choice of supporting a homogenous American company vs. something else, I'll take the something else.

      Having said that, if you give me free plane tickets to any 1st world country, I would take them :)

      --
      Can your karma go above being Excellent?
    30. Re:Poor Bill by Aussie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sorta like Pablo Escobar ?
      Many Columbians still think he was a good bloke because of the great charitable donations.

    31. Re:Poor Bill by thewiz · · Score: 1

      Even when he tries to do something nice, he gets flamed. The man just donated 20 million to the school. give him a break

      Arm, leg, neck, or back?

      --
      If "disco" means "I learn" in Latin, does "discothèque" mean "I learn technology"?
    32. Re:Poor Bill by Daneurysm · · Score: 1

      btw: I'm a staunch MS hater.

    33. Re:Poor Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how much have you given lately?

    34. Re:Poor Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One way, or two way tickets? I'd love to visit, but life in the US? Euk

    35. Re:Poor Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Something nice. You mean donate $20 million of money that the US government determined he (well, his business, but that's coupled directly to him) obtained illegally?


      I guess the street thug that mugs an old lady of $100 and gives $1 to the beggar in front of the store is doing a nice thing too, eh?

    36. Re:Poor Bill by math+major · · Score: 5, Funny

      Of course people go to the recruitment events. Free food! A handful of people actually go because they want to work for Microsoft, but most of the people are there to heckle and get free stuff. Microsoft shirts make great rugs. I always wanted to win a laptop in one of their raffles just so I could say I got a free laptop from Microsoft and put Linux on it. At last year's recruiting speech, one of the people asked "How many of you have heard of the Blaster virus?" Everyone raised their hand. "How many of you hate Microsoft because of the Blaster virus?" The guy sitting next to me: "Just because of that?" Applause.

    37. Re:Poor Bill by suckmysav · · Score: 1

      "Even when he tries to do something nice, he gets flamed. The man just donated 20 million to the school. give him a break

      If he had "donated" the money we wouldn't know about it and we wouldn't be having this discussion now. What he is doing is trying to buy some goodwill in an attempt to offset all of the badwill that gravitates towards him normally.

      Simply put, the man is karma whoring on the world stage.

      As for giving him a break, I think it is safe to assume that BillG has had more breaks in his life than the combined total of the slashdot readership. I don't see why he needs any more.

      --
      "You can't fight in here, this is the war room!"
    38. Re:Poor Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take off your tinfoil hat. I dislike microsoft as much as the next geek, but do you really think the gates foundation http://www.gatesfoundation.org/ is really trying to spread the "microsoft way"? Silly me, of course he's trying to convince starving kids dying of AIDS somewhere in africa to use windows! What a bastard.

      Plus, CMU isn't the first CS department in the country whom I would give a building do and expect them to kowtow to me. Neither is MIT, who I believe he also donated a building to. Maybe he *gasp* cares about these schools and leaves the innoculation of Microsoft to Microsoft.

    39. Re:Poor Bill by cujo_1111 · · Score: 1

      I think you are confusing Anti-American with Anti-Bush.

      USian people are generally good people, when the US Navy come to Perth, Australia, they are very polite and show the good side of the US.

      Pity the country is being run by a fool...

      --
      If I point out that you are incorrect, making me a foe does not make you any more correct.
    40. Re:Poor Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you would say that... you join us in our illegal wars after all.

    41. Re:Poor Bill by nmoog · · Score: 1

      Only people who dont truly know why they dislike the big guy are prone to doing this. Most people only hate because they are supposed to. You wont meet too many people in your life who actually have principles. Thats why people turn up on sign up day / rock up for the green card / happily eat the free McShit burger.

    42. Re:Poor Bill by njko · · Score: 1

      Sorta like Pablo Escobar ? Many Columbians still think he was a good bloke because of the great charitable donations.
      exactly
      "Never try and teach a pig to sing, you waste your time and annoy the pig" - Mark Twain
      exactly

      --
      \n.\n
    43. Re:Poor Bill by SendBot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, the real problem with AIDS relief is that patents make the pharmacudical industry a profiteering venture, to the point of disallowing affordable alternatives to such a degree that the Gates Foundation's donations would amount to a few drops in the bucket compared to the savings that a true free market would allow.

      The kicker is that BillG is a proponent of the situation that puts AIDS care out of reach for millions so that pharmacudical companies can maintain their profits from disabling fair competition. This is a complete exploitation of the necessity for AIDS treatment made possible by our wonderful patent system.

      You can read more about all this here:
      http://www.globalissues.org/EnvIssues/Population/A IDS.asp

    44. Re:Poor Bill by bishop666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Put things in perspective. Considering his net worth it's like comparing a person worth 30 grand giving $10 to charity. The charity wouldn't be likely to name a building after you and trust me you'd miss the ten dollars more than Gates will miss the twenty mill. Before his recent Philanthropy he gave away the smallest percentage of his income of any of the top one hundred. It was only after this was pointed out to him that he saw the light. It's more PR than charity.

    45. Re:Poor Bill by DesScorp · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      " Do we have to dissect every good thing that people do?"

      Yes. This is Slashdot, ground zero of the tin-foil hat crowd. If this place had 10 Commandments, 5 of them would have something to do with how evil Microsoft is.

      According to our gang, Microsoft is evil. Bill Gates is Microsoft. Thus, Bill Gates is incapable of doing any good whatsoever. Even when it appears he's doing something good, there's some deeper nefarious purpose behind it.

      Envy is a powerful and ugly thing.

      --
      Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    46. Re:Poor Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, by law, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is forced to give away 5% of all holdings each year... equivalent to around 1.5 billion or so...

      So coming from CMU IS, i wish he would just dump some more money on us!

    47. Re:Poor Bill by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      I *was* a part of Microsoft. I did it because of the temporary job security it afforded at a time when the local economy crashed.

      I am and have always been ambivalent towards them. Working for them did not change that. Funny, most of my co-workers did change their attitudes in order to be a part though.

      Now I have my own business and am much happier.

      One thing I have noticed is this: most people are against the big guy not because they know enough to be against him but because it is cool to articulate such thoughts in one's group. Yet what is going on beneath the surface is that the hatred is a bizarre form of hero worship. Give them a chance to be a part of the company and suddenly what they feel is *pride* instead of revulsion.

      Human people are a strange log ;-)

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    48. Re:Poor Bill by Nom_Anor · · Score: 1

      anyway, bill gates donating 20 millions is like you giving 10 bucks ... you don't have that much merit giving lots of money when you have billions and billions.

    49. Re:Poor Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      insightfull my ass. If Bill Gates found the cure for cancer...ah screw it, I'm sure somebody here already said it.
      You people are so one dimensional its sickening.

    50. Re:Poor Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You can see the same thing with anti-American sentiment in other countries - people will be very quick to badmouth the US, but start giving out free plane tickets and you'll get mobbed."

      By the CIA/FBI ..

    51. Re:Poor Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where would the innovative Americans be without the patent system? The system exists because it works. If you don't agree with that, then you don't understand the purpose or implications of such a system.

    52. Re:Poor Bill by mike3411 · · Score: 1

      "New Building" anyone? Thats what happens when there isnt enough $$$ for the construction, and we need another donor.

      --
      Mod me down, and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    53. Re:Poor Bill by Matrix14 · · Score: 1

      So, apparently you didn't have the fudge brownies or the brie. The food was pretty damn good, just not filling.

    54. Re:Poor Bill by Richard+Dick+Head · · Score: 1

      Very true. The reason AIDS is such a problem over there is all the strange sexual activity. HIV can be genologically traced to several different strains of SIV, or Simian Immunodeficiency Virus (monkey AIDS). If we were to eradicate human AIDS, it would simply come back again the next time someone decides it is a good idea to bone a monkey. So, yes, the weird folks need to go.

    55. Re:Poor Bill by awtbfb · · Score: 2, Informative


      Now, if 20,000 large doesn't freshen your breath to CERT, dunno what will.

      Actually CERT is within SEI which is pretty much a free-standing entity.

    56. Re:Poor Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its got a very large anti-Microsoft culture. Funny you said that. There is no anti-anything culture. Anti-Microsoft is a cult at most - culture is UNIX. Similarly, anti-negro is not a culture. There is no anti-rock music - but there are techno, brit-pop and polka.

    57. Re:Poor Bill by Xenna · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I certainly would expect anyone giving out free plane tickets to Europe, Asia, Africa or any other exotic place would be mobbed similarly. I'm not one to pass up a free intercontinental flight myself, even if N. Korea would be handing them out.

      But you're probably implying they'd want to immigrate. In poor countries you probably have a point. In western Europe (where I live) the few US haters that I know (there aren't that many) would definitely not be interested in a green card.

      I wouldn't pass up on an opportunity to work and live in the US for a few years. I wish the western world would get together and make this kind of exchange (both ways) a lot easier, would be good for everyone. It would also promote a little more mutual understanding, which, reading this subthread, seems badly needed.

    58. Re:Poor Bill by SansTinfoilHat · · Score: 1

      That is, of course, because they give out the best bribes and have the best speakers when they pull up.

      Seriously, they give away laptops, xboxes, games, copies of visual studio, t-shirts and free food. What more could a geek want?

      We got to see Halo up close and personal before the Xbox came out, we got to try out Tablet PCs and those Spot watches while they were still in development. I mean, come on, while the latter two haven't caught on, it's still something neat to tune in for. They brought one of the designers of Crimson Skies in last year and we got to have a great talk offline about game design.

      They even bring back honest alumni to talk to us - who actually tell us what sucks about working for Microsoft.

      Evil corporation yes, but damn fine recruiting.

    59. Re:Poor Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh no!! Bill Gates is going to take over the known world and he'll eat your soul!! It's all part of his secret agenda! It's true! I saw it all in the newspaper at the supermarket checkout!

      The level of paranoia for this article is impressive. A lot of the posters really need a good psychiatrist, seriously. Despite what you all might think, they're not out to get you. You simply aren't worth it, now get over yourselves.

    60. Re:Poor Bill by MourningBlade · · Score: 1

      he gave only $20,000,000 of the $50,000,000 required for the building

      It's quite a bit easier to get matching funds for a large private donation than you'd think. Part of the problem with starting a large collection is getting the first donor. Many other groups, including the government, are big believers in matching funds.

      The National Council for the Arts works this way: they give a small "seed" donation, which is then doubled, tripled, etc by matching funds. The very fact that the cause gets the money allows them to get much more.

      I have some experience with this and writing grants for science, and that seems to be the way it works.

    61. Re:Poor Bill by rc-gt-cs · · Score: 1

      How much is he worth and he donates $20 million? Christoper Klaus donated $15 million to Georgia Tech and isn't worth anything near Mr. Gates. Even Ted Turner donated $100 million a few years ago and he isn't near Mr. Gate's worth either. Poor Bill?!

    62. Re:Poor Bill by g-doo · · Score: 1

      But I'm sure that many Slashdotters wouldn't be so critical if it was Steve Jobs donating towards the building.

    63. Re:Poor Bill by Deorus · · Score: 1

      What matters is not the action, but the intention.

      I think you should read this.

    64. Re:Poor Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      America doesn't need visitors, it needs an occupation army that cuts down their facists police state to size.

    65. Re:Poor Bill by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      Perhaps that only applies to the type of people that actually apply to work at MS?
      Then again, I might be wrong - I'm not a psychologist.

    66. Re:Poor Bill by sahonen · · Score: 1

      It makes me wonder if this practice will continue once actual immortality becomes a reality. I sincerely hope I'll be around to observe the results, but like Bill I'm not holding my breath.

      Holding your breath would, in fact, be quite the wrong way to try to achieve immortality.

      --
      Make me a friend and I'll mod you up
    67. Re:Poor Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Bill Gates may be [...evil...] but he also does a lot of good things

      Yes. And Adolf Hitler did the autobahn.

    68. Re:Poor Bill by l3v1 · · Score: 1

      As about naming buildings of people who donated the money for it: it's a deal you know, they give something they expect something in return. And maybe they'll give some more in the future :)

      I personally wouldn't care what Gates' name is given to if his money is spent in other people's interest/comfort/whatever.

      As to:
      You can see the same thing with anti-American sentiment in other countries - people will be very quick to badmouth the US, but start giving out free plane tickets and you'll get mobbed.

      You know, also statements like this is what some people just call "so american".

      And just for the record, it wouldn't hurt any of such people (i.e. like you) to get a bit down on the ground and realize that Uncle Sam isn't as much magnetic and seductive as guys like you very much like to think (and as it may have used to be). Well, I don't know about 3rd world countries though...

      I work in IT, know many scientists and researchers in my area and some beyond, and very few of them would be willing to live in the U.S. (myself included - although I have to tell here that I have more relatives living in the U.S. for decades now so I wouldn't just go out in the wild).

      Now about work, that's different. If I would be offered a job for a few years in the U.S., I would take it.

      --
      I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
    69. Re:Poor Bill by phiwum · · Score: 1

      Now, if 20,000 large doesn't freshen your breath to CERT, dunno what will.

      This is insulting. I doubt seriously that researchers at CERT give a damn about Gates's contribution to CMU.

      --
      Phiwum's law: anyone that names an obvious law after himself and then puts it in his own sig is just pathetic.
    70. Re:Poor Bill by Sunnan · · Score: 1
      People always hate the big guy until they get a chance to be a part.

      No shit!

      Both in the case of Microsoft, and US foreign policy, the "big guy" actually hurts others, and that's where the hatred comes from. If you join the big guy, you won't get hurt anymore, so of course some people will do it.
    71. Re:Poor Bill by eclectro · · Score: 1

      Gee, envy is not the emotion that I am feeling as I remove all the viruses, worms, trojans, browser hijacks off from my mother's windows machine.

      All of which seem to trying to break the ten commandments one way or another. I guess maybe not murder, but my mother felt quite murderous when her internet explorer was been randomly hijacked to a russian porn site that would put nekkid butts in her face.

      No, I don't call it envy. I call it hate of a crappy and insecure product that Microsoft continually tries to force everyone into using.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    72. Re:Poor Bill by pridkett · · Score: 1

      Actually, as for students purchasing MS products, the license allows students to pick up WinXP and Office 2003 for $10 a pop. When you factor that across all the students, it still adds up, but is a nice savings to have a legal copy sitting around for running Office in Wine/VMWare.

      --
      My Slashdot account is old enough to drink...
    73. Re:Poor Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've outdone yourself again, DAldredge.

    74. Re:Poor Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmmmmm, US hater's logic. Always funny.

      (No, I'm not a USA!!!USA!!!USA!!!NUMBER1 American, I'm a Swede.)

    75. Re:Poor Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The nazi's aren't cool. They used to be cool, but that was 60 years ago.
      Well, at least the military forces of a country that happened to be run by national socialists 60 years ago were extremely cool.

    76. Re:Poor Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish to apologise for using an apostrophe in the plural of "nazi". I don't know how it happened, but it won't happen again. Everyone should say national socialists or NSDAP anyway.

      Slow Down Cowboy!

      Slashdot requires you to wait 2 minutes between each successful posting of a comment to allow everyone a fair chance at posting a comment.

      It's been 1 minute since you last successfully posted a comment

      Chances are, you're behind a firewall or proxy, or clicked the Back button to accidentally reuse a form. Please try again. If the problem persists, and all other options have been tried, contact the site administrator.

    77. Re:Poor Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with the retarded moderator: that's a most "Interesting" post!
      Exactly what did Gates steal from CMU?

      Or are you deliberately posting random gibberish with no connection to the topic at hand?

    78. Re:Poor Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So? Hitler wasn't evil, just narcissistic and incompetent when it came to military strategy. Unfortunately this led to suffering for millions of Germans (and people in German occupied countries who also suffered the wrath of the ensuing "liberation" by the Allies), but this wasn't Hitler's intent.

    79. Re:Poor Bill by edittard · · Score: 1
      I work in IT, know many scientists and researchers in my area and some beyond, and very few of them would be willing to live in the U.S. [...]
      Now about work, that's different. If I would be offered a job for a few years in the U.S., I would take it.
      And during that time, what? It'd be bit of a long commute from Bombay.
      --
      At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
    80. Re:Poor Bill by ChrsJxn · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, administrations enjoy naming things after whoever foots the most of the bill, and in this case, it's Gates.

      What I want to know is what are they getting rid of to put in the new building? And where's it going to be?
      I've scoped out the campus, and either it's going to be a fairly small building, or something is going to have to be (re)moved.

      --
      I once saw a /. article with 1 comment.
      I should've got a screenshot.
    81. Re:Poor Bill by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      Holding your breath would, in fact, be quite the wrong way to try to achieve immortality.
      *Cough* I'm in a room full of poison *splutter* gas, you insenstive *clunk*
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    82. Re:Poor Bill by tius · · Score: 1

      You forgot to mention that this is also an instance of where the uber rich have an advantage over the less greedy. Namely, that they can choose where some of their tax dollars go. And that, amigo, is all this is...directed taxes that actually buy benefit to the provider.

      "It's a sick world, what can I say, artificial phonies, I hate 'em I hate 'em...." The Ramones

    83. Re:Poor Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "he gave only $20,000,000 of the $50,000,000 required for the building "

      The tight bastard!

    84. Re:Poor Bill by griann · · Score: 1
      I agree that people do those things that they experience benefit from. Nothing unreasonable about that. If your actions do not promote something that you value, or oppose something you have aversion to, then what the fuck is your motivation? This does not limit the benefit of the transaction, even if it does advise us to count our fingers and toes afterwards.

      However, the specific attributions made should have rendered the mods for this post funny, surely.

      You can say what you like about Stallman politically or personally. However, I insist that he is far too intelligent to believe that he does what he does to impress the ladies.

    85. Re:Poor Bill by iggy3 · · Score: 1

      You didn't read the post above by javiercero (518708).

      --
      -- freedom fighter with no complaints.
    86. Re:Poor Bill by Shihar · · Score: 1

      You make it sound like that is a bad thing. The government would have a lot fewer dumb pork barrel programs if people could choose where their money goes. Of course, people having a say in government sounds too much like Democracy. Surely the world would end if we took the decision as to where the money goes out of a politicians hands.

    87. Re:Poor Bill by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      Upon further reflection, your charge is fair, and the temptation for a cheap pun late at night was better resisted.
      OTOH, time will judge whether CERT loses objectivity.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    88. Re:Poor Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      americans paying for overpriced software whose bloated profits go to the charities that they should be really donating to anyway.

      kind of like a modern day Robin Hood if you ask me...

    89. Re:Poor Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Bill is a good man. Just like if I was to force your mom and dad to give me all their money so I could donate it to my school and get my name in lights. I would be good to my school but I still robbed your parents to get the money.

      Yes, Bill is sooo good!

    90. Re:Poor Bill by Will+Fisher · · Score: 1

      In the William Gates Building in Cambridge Uni (England), I take pleasure in booting up any one of the workstations in the building into Linux.

    91. Re:Poor Bill by McNihil · · Score: 0

      It's equivalent to $25 done by us mere mortals. Suck on that for a while. Personaly I think we can all do much better than $25/year/person in charity. ->>-

    92. Re:Poor Bill by ammie · · Score: 1

      "Your fiancee is only marrying you because she doesn't want to have to be self-sufficient"

      Ya butthead, I AM the "she", and I TRIPLE his salary!!
      He's a bike mechanic.

      I definately married him for luuuv. (and sex. whatever.)

      --
      {...reality is wrong, Dreams are for real...}
    93. Re:Poor Bill by Phisbut · · Score: 1
      USian people are generally good people

      Although I agree the not every USian is as stupid as Bush, there are still millions of them who want Bush to stay for 4 more years... so it's not only 1 person, there are millions of people who believe bombing people all around the world helps peace and freedom, and who agree to the PATRIOT act and such.

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    94. Re:Poor Bill by Garse+Janacek · · Score: 1
      On the flip side, though, 15-20% of the CS grads end up going to MS (this year, at least, and I know many of those people personally). It's not all about the free food... it's also about the money ;)

      Hate MS or not, they treat their employees very well. Great benefits, great pay, great hours. I turned down their job offer, but a lot of people don't, and I can understand why...

      --

      I am the man with no sig!

    95. Re:Poor Bill by AbbyNormal · · Score: 1

      So I guess we always have to be pessimistic about what a man's angle is for donating to charity?

      What if, per chance, he IS actually donating the money out of the goodness of his being? Nah, that angle could never be convered, this is Slashdot. Nerds, News, and pessimism.

      --
      Sig it.
    96. Re:Poor Bill by methuselah · · Score: 1

      I agree, he can do it. he did it. thanks bill. I still think his company sucks. aparently i am in the minority as his comapany is a monopoly. if he continues to do good things with his money at least the guy is a "good" winner. many wealthy people are pigs. they play to win. by any method that is quantifiable he won. now we get to watch what he does with his wealth/power. get over it bill didn't single handedly whoop the entire computer universe, he just collected the cash. when he dies uncle sam gets at least half. if i were in his shoes i be spending it like a maniac. if not, the american government gets the last laugh, they will buy a war with his wealth or something eaually beneficial. so let him spend it say thanks and be grateful that half of whatever he gives away wont wind up being wasted by the nanny state.

    97. Re:Poor Bill by ignavus · · Score: 1

      When you are rich you can buy a "good" reputation.

      He has about 80 billion dollars, and he gives away 20 million. That is like me earning $80,000 a year, and giving away 20 dollars of it. I earn less than $80,000 a year, and I give away (yes) much more than $20 *a week*. And I wouldn't be surprised if I pay much more tax than he does, pro rata, too.

      But it is worth remembering: when Bill Gates and I both die, he will be no richer than I am.

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
    98. Re:Poor Bill by ignavus · · Score: 1

      He started out as a geek like most of us... I am glad to hear that your grandfather set up a million dollar trust for you when you were one year old (that's $1,000,000 in 1956 dollars - worth a bit more than that now). And you went to just about the only school in your city able to afford its own computer - personal computers didn't exist, not even the Altair 8800, but Gates's high school had a computer - go figure.

      Yes, we were all geeks like that.

      The guy was born filthy rich - and he competes ruthlessly - don't you get it yet? Next you'll be telling us that the Queen of England is just a normal middle-class mom.

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
    99. Re:Poor Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, what does that say about the intentions of your fiancé ? :)

    100. Re:Poor Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe they are going to get rid of the old student center and possibly some adjacent buildings (the old student center is pretty crappy).

      But not Cyert or Hamburg or anything important.

      From the artistic concept they showed the new building should be visible from Forbes Avenue and present a decent image (unlike Wean!) with a nice lawn some walkways etc.

    101. Re:Poor Bill by danila · · Score: 1

      This is not true. We do a lot of good things simply because we were wired that way in the process of evolution. Altriusm is in our genes. Egoism is too, but let's not deny either.

      When asked to help (or even when I see that a person needs help), my natural reaction is to help them, regardless of possible payoff. And it doesn't feel particularly good - it simply feels right.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    102. Re:Poor Bill by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      I'm sure Andrew Carnegie only founded CMU as a Social Investing strategy to get free publicity for his U.S. Steel business... right?

      He was, for all intents and purposes, the Bill Gates of the 19th century, after all.

    103. Re:Poor Bill by sadomikeyism · · Score: 1
      Danila,
      You say you do it because "it feels right". It is YOUR feeling that you feel there, not how the person you help feels. You do good because IT MAKES YOU FEEL RIGHT. This is indeed how we are wired, to do good things because it makes US, as INDIVIDUALS feel good ABOUT OURSELVES.
      Sadists get the EXACT SAME feeling by hurting others as you do by helping others. Both your actions, and that of the sadist, are entirely selfish.

      --
      "Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves
    104. Re:Poor Bill by DesScorp · · Score: 1

      Please correct me if I'm wrong here....but did Microsoft hold a gun to your mother's head and make her buy a computer with Windows?

      I'll be the first to agree that Windows has all the security of swiss cheese. And it's obviously the dominant operating system.

      BUT NO ONE IS FORCED TO USE IT. Your mother can buy an Apple. And before you say "But Apples are too expensive, and Linux is too hard for my mother to use", realize that it's your mothers problem (and yours), not Microsoft's. You have a choice not to use Windows. If quality and ease of use is your main problem, You can get an eMac for under 800 bucks now. If money is your problem (or hers), you can put together a box for peanuts, and put Linux on it. She's just going to have to make do with mean 'ole KDE or Gnome.

      Or she could stop using a computer. It's up to her. And you.

      --
      Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    105. Re:Poor Bill by sharkey · · Score: 1
      Now, if 20,000 large doesn't freshen your breath to CERT, dunno what will.

      Stop making software that's insecure-by-design?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    106. Re:Poor Bill by phiwum · · Score: 1

      Upon further reflection, your charge is fair, and the temptation for a cheap pun late at night was better resisted.
      OTOH, time will judge whether CERT loses objectivity.


      Uh... This has never happened to me. What do we do now?

      Are you sure you didn't want to fight or something?

      --
      Phiwum's law: anyone that names an obvious law after himself and then puts it in his own sig is just pathetic.
    107. Re:Poor Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The man is BUYING your goodwill after raping an industry for decades to get the money to do it with. Wake the fuck up.

    108. Re:Poor Bill by danila · · Score: 1

      Selfish: 1) "Concerned chiefly or only with oneself."

      2) "Caring supremely or unduly for one's self; regarding one's own comfort, advantage, etc., in disregard, or at the expense, of those of others."

      3) "Believing or teaching that the chief motives of human action are derived from love of self." (in ethics)

      If you want to redefine the word to mean "guided by your own brain", this is wrong. Yes, in that case my actions would be described as selfish, so you'd be correct, but the English language would suffer a minor rape. :)

      When I help someone, I am not being selfish. First, I am concerned with another person foremost. Second, I only care about others' comfort, not about my own. Third, I don't feel paricularly good, I don't really enjoy it - it just seems the correct action.

      I don't help simply for the feeling, I help for helping. The feeling is just an indicator. Similarly, you fix a leaking faucet because it feels right, because you know this should be done, but the motivation is not in the feeling itself, it's in the outcome. In my case the outcome doesn't have to do anything with myself - entirely with others, ergo I am not selfish.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    109. Re:Poor Bill by sadomikeyism · · Score: 1

      I fix a leaking faucet cause I can't friggin sleep at night from the "drip.... drip.... drip...." Again, another purely selfish motivation. If I thought fixing faucets was an inherent good, I'd break into people's homes to make sure their faucets were not leaking, but still it would be producing SELF SATISFACTION, and ergo it would be selfish. Pure Altruism does not exist, there are just varying relative degrees of selfish behavior. Even what you are saying now you do not to educate me, but to prove that you are right, and therefore more superior than I, ergo feeding your self satisfaction. You can go and lie to your concious self about it, but deep down you know its all a crock. There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch.

      --
      "Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves
    110. Re:Poor Bill by danila · · Score: 1

      Yes, you fix faucets to sleep well at night, but not because you enjoy fixing them. Ergo, it is possible to do things that you don't directly derive satisfaction from. And I don't derive satisfaction from the helping (actually sometimes I do, but sometimes I don't). I also usually don't help people to get anything in return (though very rarely I do). The motivation is not necessarily selfish, as hard as it can be for you to believe.

      Right now I am trying to persuade you because I enjoy doing this - selfish, you are right. But there have been many cases where I would post some information on the Net just to help someone, even though I don't particularly care about the topic, about the person, etc., and don't expect anything in return. And I didn't feel especially happy about it, I would certainly be happier spending that time playing Minesweeper or something.

      It is obvious that I do it because that's the way my brain work, but that doesn't necessarily mean I am selfish. That merely means that I behave this way because I want to. It just happens that I want to help others. :)

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    111. Re:Poor Bill by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      What bill is indulging here is what is known as Social Investing

      Then how do you explain that he just recently gave away exactly half of his fortune?

      You read that right, he gave away 23 billion dollars. And nobody even knows about it. How's that for your spin?

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    112. Re:Poor Bill by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      If the or something involves a cup of Earl Grey and some serious thought of the meaning of life, I'm game.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    113. Re:Poor Bill by stonecypher · · Score: 2, Interesting

      CERT is basically government-funded. The reason they're at the university is that almost all government-funded big computing stuff is at either a university or a shady secret building with no windows. The SEI is one of three government installations at CMU, alongside the supercomputing center and the Mellon Institute (the last of which is also industry funded; yay Westinghouse.)

      CMU gets a $20m contribution every year. Nobody in the university is particularly impressed. Certainly not CERT, who have dealt with enough of Microsoft's issues to know better. They're no less jaded than you are.

      Gates isn't trying to impress the university. He's trying to impress the undergraduates. If this means that two out of every hundred undergrads are now pro-microsoft, given CMU's success rate, he's just made a good investment moneywise. That's why MS and Borland give their toolchains to universities, why Apple pushes its platform but why clonemakers don't: they're all pushing their particular interface, because the academia drives novelty, and novelty owns this market. We stick to what we're used to and when looking for new we default to what we've heard of. Gates is buying familiarity, and given the experience I've had with doe-eyed freshmen, it's working.

      That said, he's also a hell of a real philanthropist. Not all of the money he gives away has an ulterior motive. Even if you go through my particular views on what he's given away as dirty or not-dirty, and only count the not-dirty stuff, he's still the single largest philanthropist in history, donating hugely to agrarian and immunological concerns.

      He may be a scumbag businessman, but he's turning a lot of that money to organized capital-g Good efforts which were otherwise going ignored.

      We tend to forget that Carnegie was so hard to his workers that he built apartment buildings where the apartments had corridors between rooms that were half-height and offset upwards, so that apartments could be stacked more efficiently; it is arguable that much of Carnegie's success came from skill in screwing his workers (he basically invented both the company shop and company housing unless you count the Egyptian pharoahs; he's basically the reason for the move to unions, yellow dog laws and the Homestead riots.)

      Why do we forget? Because, in his old age feeling guilty, Carnegie tried to give it all away. (He was so rich that he wasn't able to spend his fortune in his dying decade; he got about 80% of it out the door, and had to give the rest away as trusts.) He established the world's largest library chain, including modern governmental library systems (yes, there are more Carnegie libraries than US libraries.) He established many of the US' great cultural centers, including one so focal to American stage culture for fifty years that even now, another fifty years later his name brings to mind the same joke in all of our heads (Practice!) He established one of the world's great museums as part of one of the world's few nongovernmental museum chains, which maintains what are largely considered three of the world's great art collections today (you go to the Louvre for renaissance painting; you go to MOMA for experimental painting; you go to Garnegie for contemporary and modern art.) One of the world's great travelling art exhibitions is named for him and maintained by one of his trusts. Many of the nation's great parks are maintained by his money. Many of the world's great mansions belonged to him, his family or his friends. He gave huge trusts silently to dozens of what are still our great universities to promote industry and technology. One of our great universities was built on his money (Mellon pulled out at the last second, when it was too late to remove his name. Carnegie was a great man. Mellon was a scumbag.)

      I hate to say it, especially here where he's so hated, but in fifty years when his business tactics are forgotten and nobody's heard of Stac Electronics or Gary Kildall or OS/2, largely because of his phila

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    114. Re:Poor Bill by sadomikeyism · · Score: 1
      Why do you want to help others? Because at some time in your childhood, people you respected told you that helping others was the right thing to do. You are now programmed, and get self satisfaction from doing so, even subconciously, especially subconciously, as much as a pavlovian dog salivates unknowlingly at the ring of a bell. It is a reflex, programmed into you, that you perform without knowing why sometimes.

      And denying a selfish purpose is also programmed, because you were taught that selfishness is wrong too. You'll deny it to your grave, and feel guilty and bad if you start suspecting that I am right.

      --
      "Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves
    115. Re:Poor Bill by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      Yeah, let's make sure not to forget about how Bill Gates overthrew a small hispanic nation in a memorably ugly coup.

      That's called guilt by demonization, which is a form of guilt by association modified with hasty generalization, all a family of argumentum ad hominem: attacking the character of the person rather than the topic at hand.

      Bzzt. You might as well say that people still think Jackie O. was a good gal because of all the charitable donations, and then attack the business practices of her former husband Mister Onassis (in many ways he was Bill's contemporary of another age) or of John's grandfather, who made his money running alcohol during the depression.

      It's not fair to say that someone is guilty because someone else who shares one obvious trait actually is obviously guilty. Billy boy has never had a town burnt to the ground (probably.) There's a big difference. Sit down and crack open a basic debate book, please.

      Mod parent into the ground.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    116. Re:Poor Bill by betat · · Score: 1

      If he donates anonymously, how will we be able to complain about it. ;)

      Besides, how would anyone know if he did make anonymous donations? Maybe he has, but it was anonymous so we couldn't attribute it to him.

    117. Re:Poor Bill by eclectro · · Score: 1

      Indeed, you are right. She doesn't like the idea, but she is about to find all of her files on a linux box. Also, I have told her to tell her friends that I no longer support Microsoft products anymore, as I have a steady stream of people beating a path to my door.

      Microsoft doesn't hold a gun to your head, only because they probably would not get away with it. As we have seen in the past, laws have not stopped microsoft from illegal behavior.

      The problem is when you go into a retail store, all the machines are sold with Windows XP on them, so the sheeple buy them. There very rarely are any macs to even choose from, and never any linux boxes.

      On top of that, all the commercial software on the shelves run on Microsoft. People want to buy software off the retail shelf and load it on their computer.

      The fact is, and has been lamented countless times on slashdot, it is in Microsoft's best interest to continue to have an iron grip on the computer retail market, so they do.

      I am hopeful that firefox will set a precedent for other alternative software. And hopefully crossover and transgaming will mature. But until they do, when I walk into circuit city, all I see is Microsoft and compatible products, snd that's what people buy.

      But you know this already. You're just being argumentive

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    118. Re:Poor Bill by Aussie · · Score: 1

      You miss the point, both made money illegally and used their ill gotten gains to improve their image.

      Remember, MicroSoft was convicted.

    119. Re:Poor Bill by HoboMaster · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you bothered to find out anything about the way donations to academic institutions work, you'd know that Bill will have absolutely nothing to do with the way the building is run and nothing to do with anything taught inside of it (short of the broad "Computer Science" category). He paid $20 mil to get his name on a building and to help the academic community. It's pretty common, and it usually has little to do with the person's affiliations (ie the Erik Johnnson building at UTD. He was a rich guy that donated money to have building built at a university, so they named it for him.)

      Yeah, Bill wanted his name on a building... I'm pretty sure this is true of most people, I know I damn well do, I just can't afford to make that happen. Bill can.

      --
      Remember kids, tin foil doesn't work, so use LeadHat.
    120. Re:Poor Bill by danila · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Not really. Of course, you may claim that you know more about my childhood than I do, but I don't remember being extensively told to help others - no more, no less than any other kid is told that. My desire to help others developed in some other way. No, it is silly to call it a reflex, because this is clearly not - it's an example of higher nervous functions, not something as basic as salivating on a bell. Of course, it would be equally silly to deny that I am "wired" or "programmed" this way, but don't equate it with reflexes. My complex mind evolved in such a way as to help others - this is always my free choice, the decision depends on many factors, but quite often I decide to do it.

      In regards to denying the selfish person, I think you are wrong as well. In fact, I find being selfish good, correct and rational. I am actually quite selfish (sometimes my willingness to admit it really surprises others), but I also act altruistically sometimes. Some of these altruistic acts are results of simple societal programming (letting someone sit in the metro, opening a door for someone), but others are a result of my own free choice, but still aren't selfish.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  3. Blue by adisakp · · Score: 2

    How the heck would the color blue pay homage to Bill ?

    1. Re:Blue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Blue Screen of Death.

    2. Re:Blue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      well you know...

      The infamous yellow screen of death... oh wait!

    3. Re:Blue by timgoh0 · · Score: 1

      Because the microsoft logo is traditionally white on a blue background?

    4. Re:Blue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blue Screen of Death

    5. Re:Blue by brq22 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Maybe in reference to the infamous BLUE SCREEN OF DEATH? Just an idea.

    6. Re:Blue by generic-man · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Carnegie Mellon already has one blue building. It's called Donner Hall (large JPEG) and it'd be a nice joke if CMU were to name it after Gates instead. It's the residence hall where they stuff hundreds of freshmen every year.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    7. Re:Blue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ahhh.. that's not blue man.

    8. Re:Blue by k0ft · · Score: 1

      How the heck would the color blue pay homage to Bill ?

      As long as a dump of the stack and registers is painted on the side along with the blue, i'd say that would be a perfect hommage to Bill Gates.

    9. Re:Blue by freakmn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Blue is a homonym of blew, which is the past tense of blows, which describes his software, of course! That and the BSOD, the default background color, the ocean near Washington, Washington state on some maps, and of course Bills scorching case of blue balls. (I made that last one up...)

      --
      warning: This post is likely to contain gobs of dripping sarcasm. Consume at your own risk.
    10. Re:Blue by darcon · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the simpsons episode where Homer's Stonecutter cult paints a hospital sky blue, and then a plane crashes into it

    11. Re:Blue by sewagemaster · · Score: 1

      actually when i read blue at first i thought "playskool colors"...

    12. Re:Blue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd suggest they paint the building a nice scenic blend of Teletubby green and blue.

    13. Re:Blue by ImTwoSlick · · Score: 1
      Blue Screen of Death.

      I would just love set up a projector one night, and paint the infamous white memory dump text on the building.

    14. Re:Blue by cujo_1111 · · Score: 1

      Damn, that is one ugly building...

      CMU may have a good CS program but I'll steer clear of their architects.

      --
      If I point out that you are incorrect, making me a foe does not make you any more correct.
    15. Re:Blue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For greater effect and authenticity, you could show a typical Windows desktop in the process of launching Minesweeper or Solitaire immediately preceding the Windows MOTD (aka BSOD).

    16. Re:Blue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pity. They have a good architecture dept, too. One story I've heard is that Carnegie originally set up the buildings so that, if this whole school thingy doesn't work out, it can be turned into a factory with assembly line - CMU started its life as tech/vocational school to educate children of Carnegie' steel plant employees, but one thing led to another and it turned into this fancy-schmancy University.

    17. Re:Blue by DirePickle · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yes, I believe that was the joke. Congratulations. ;)

    18. Re:Blue by deimtee · · Score: 1

      It's called Donner Hall (large JPEG) and it'd be a nice joke if CMU were to name it after Gates instead. It's the residence hall where they stuff hundreds of freshmen every year.

      Do they stuff them for the Donner Party?

      --
      I'm guessing that wasn't on their radar screen...
    19. Re:Blue by mdfst13 · · Score: 1

      CMU students have something of a history of painting vandalism: this might actually happen. Didn't RTFA, but it would be funny if the building was put where the fence (repainted about once a week by CMU organizations with agendas to push) was the last time that I was there.

  4. Bright Blue eh? by AssProphet · · Score: 1

    the building should be painted bright blue."

    Ah.... A monument to ugliness, much like the XP color themes. I get it!

    1. Re:Bright Blue eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're okay so long as they don't paint a white-on-red X in a box on the roof.

    2. Re:Bright Blue eh? by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 2, Funny

      It will be ugly all right, if it looks anything like this Bill Gates computer science building.

    3. Re:Bright Blue eh? by endx7 · · Score: 1

      Ah.... A monument to ugliness, much like the XP color themes. I get it!

      Ohhh! So that's where the Blue Screen of Death went!

    4. Re:Bright Blue eh? by awtbfb · · Score: 1

      It will be ugly all right,

      Doubtful, CMU has a pretty serious push in recent history towards a common aesthetic look to the campus.

    5. Re:Bright Blue eh? by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      The Cambridge one won some architectural award somehow. A friend of mine who works there (doing a PhD) enjoyed himself immensely pointing out the defects - a colour scheme which leads people hunting for toilets (coloured orange IIRC) to find kitchens (also orange) instead; a complete lack of heating, which is supposed to be provided by the computers; etc.

  5. Blue eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Blue screen of death? ;)

  6. hmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they should build it properly after 3 service packs

  7. Blue by oskard · · Score: 5, Funny

    They can write BSOD in big white letters on the top of it.

    --
    Sigs are for Terrorists.
  8. BSOD jokes by chrispyman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now I like BSOD jokes as much as the next person but seriously I think that's one area we can atleast applaud Microsoft at. It's really quite a rare date (or an indication of hardware failure) to see a BSOD in Windows XP. Now those damned security issues on the other hand...

    1. Re:BSOD jokes by oskard · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ahhh stop. You're killing me. No, really STOP 0x0000000A BAD_BSOD_JOKES

      --
      Sigs are for Terrorists.
    2. Re:BSOD jokes by Prod_Deity · · Score: 1

      "the building should be painted bright blue" The the name of the building in white letters? Sorry, couldn't help it.

    3. Re:BSOD jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In addition to the building being painted blue, the windows will not be secureable.

    4. Re:BSOD jokes by lakiolen · · Score: 1

      Yet you still hear about them enough in XP to know they still happen. Personally i've had about 1 per year, which is not many, but that is still a much higher frequency than other OS's

      --


      What are you expecting to find here?
    5. Re:BSOD jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG YOU GOT IT!

      No wonder, being a deity.

      Loser.

      Type.

      Guy.

    6. Re:BSOD jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The ONLY reason you don't see them that much anymore is NOT because Windows is more stable -- it's because by default now if the system freezes it automatically reboots!

      Now if that's not incompetent, I don't know what is.

    7. Re:BSOD jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Control Panel -> System -> Startup and Recovery (nice moniker, eh?) -> Automatically Restart.

      Rebooting without notice might be nice in an unattended server, but those of us who use our computers might want to know what caused the (latest) crash.

      Is this disgusting? You bet! Is Microsoft disgusting? You bet!

    8. Re:BSOD jokes by Fizzl · · Score: 1

      Haven't seen a BSOD on my home w2k box for so long time, I can't even remember was it this year, the previous or even perhaps the year before that. I use wide variety of software from coding to graphics to music composition on that. No weird hardware or other kernel level drivers (except for WinPcap).
      However, I have no control what software is on my work laptop (good, one less thing for me to worry about), instead the "IT guys" push whatever they see should be the defacto package of the moment.
      There is a LOT of software which works on very low levels to ensure data security incase I do something stupid like plugging it to an unsecure network or simply lose it by theft or own stupidity. You know, firewall, VPN, virus scanner, under-the-windows-level disk encryption, manythings-which-apparently-contribute-to-the-secu rity-but-i-have-no-idea-what-they-do.

      It's actually crashing on weekly basis. I don't usually care what the hell was it that crashed it this time, but I would go to suggest that it is the spagethi of 3rd party kernel level drivers, which prolly also assume they are the only oddball drivers on the machine so they can get away with some nastiness.

      Now, I wish /. would stop embedding those (funny, but) trollish comments to articles so we could discuss more of the article than these silly slams at MS (or whoever we hate this time)

    9. Re:BSOD jokes by 5i · · Score: 2, Interesting

      nope! wrong again.

      I spent 12 straight hours on saturday trying to help my brother with his XP machine.

      He wanted to use it to play games, had spent a bunch of cash on good hardware, etc... and had spent the last 3 months enlisting help from various skilled support-type geek friends to try and stop it crashing.

      It crashed, on average, about every 3 minutes. And not in one game, but in any of a whole bunch. And we're talking yes, full wipe out to BSOD and/or reboot.

      Ok, so bad vid drivers the most likely reason, sure (although any one of a dozen error code didn't help pinpoint it. And no, not memory, we full memtested it, stick by stick, removed hardware ad nauseum).

      Eventually, we put Win2k on it. An hour or so later he was up and running for a good 24 hour session, no crashes at all. .. and don't get me started about my ex's XP laptop that regularly blue screens during movie playing.

      me, I won't touch it with a bargepole, not until SP3 at least.

    10. Re:BSOD jokes by Nezer · · Score: 1

      >>> It's really quite a rare date (or an indication of hardware failure) to see a BSOD in Windows XP.

      You're kidding, right? XP Pro here and I've seen 2 today alone. It's absolutely NOT a hardware issue as the driver that's blowing it all up doesn't talk to hardware (not directly anyway, and the root drivers work without issue).

      Can we blame the driver? Sure, but the OS should be able to handle shit like that a lot better than it does.

    11. Re:BSOD jokes by tommywho70x · · Score: 0

      So passe'

      Nowadays, it's a silent 32-bit POD - Ping of Death

      GDI+ failed to install [Printers]folder.htt[("Y")]
      System halted. You will need to reinstall WINDOWS

    12. Re:BSOD jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they'd have fixed that shite 5 years ago, as demanded by standards of mediocrity, we'd not still be making the jokes, but Microsoft does not even live up to the meager standards of mediocrity.

    13. Re:BSOD jokes by martingunnarsson · · Score: 1

      I've been running XP for a couple of years at work and at home, and I've NEVER seen an XP BSOD. Now, XP have some serious (and some not so serious) security issues, but it's a damn well polished product, and (here comes the flamebait part) no Linux distro is even close to being as user friendly and nice to work with on the desktop.

      --
      Martin
    14. Re:BSOD jokes by cliveholloway · · Score: 1

      Try installing Win XP Sp2 and then play two games at a time in Yahoo! Pool - I get two a day at the moment...

      cLive ;-)

      --
      -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
    15. Re:BSOD jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now I like BSOD jokes as much as the next person but seriously I think that's one area we can atleast applaud Microsoft at. It's really quite a rare date (or an indication of hardware failure) to see a BSOD in Windows XP.

      This is a prime example of Microsoft marketing in action, people.

      You should not be grateful and impressed when your software works properly! You should expect your software to work without crashing all the time!

    16. Re:BSOD jokes by unclethursday · · Score: 1
      Try OS X and see which enviroment is more user freindly: XP or OS X?

      I found OS X to be much more user-friendly than any version of Windows, and generally more stable to boot.

      If you think you can't live without a 2-button mouse,then just plug one in; it'll work. And once you get into using Expose, you'll wonder when MS is finally going to copH^H^H^innovate it into Windows.

    17. Re:BSOD jokes by martingunnarsson · · Score: 1

      I use my mac more than my PC, and I love OS X as much as you, but I think XP is better/more user friendly in some ways.

      - Expose or not, I think XP gives you a better view of the windows you have open.
      - The uninstall function in Windows works great, and OS X doesn't even have one! I mean, most programs save stuff in the Application Support-folder and/or other places. Stuff that you have to find and delete manually when you want to remove a program.
      - I like the idea that every windows has it's own menu bar, but this is mostly a matter of taste I guess.
      - Why doesn't Finder windows have an "up" button? I know you have the drop-down with the steps in the path to the current forlder, but a button to go to the parent folder would be nice. I can't see why they don't have one.

      Etc. I'm not saying OS X isn't user friendly, but sometimes it doesn't feel quite finished.

      --
      Martin
    18. Re:BSOD jokes by TiMac · · Score: 1
      - Expose or not, I think XP gives you a better view of the windows you have open.

      Care to explain? If I have 50 Windows open on XP, it's pretty tough to see all of them at the same time. That Taskbar is pretty worthless too when it has that many windows open. Expose is underappreciated. I questioned it until I set it to buttons on my mouse, and now I cannot live without it.

      - The uninstall function in Windows works great, and OS X doesn't even have one! I mean, most programs save stuff in the Application Support-folder and/or other places. Stuff that you have to find and delete manually when you want to remove a program.

      The Mac has always had the ability to just "throw away applications" due to lack of registry, etc. To add in an uninstaller would take away this usability benefit. Say what you want but being forced to use an uninstaller might be more "proper" and/or "clean" but certainly LESS "user friendly"

      - I like the idea that every windows has it's own menu bar, but this is mostly a matter of taste I guess.

      We call this "inconsistency" in the Mac world. Being able to look at one place for a menu all the time is very nice. Also has a nicer metaphor for having an application open once instead of having multiple instances.

      - Why doesn't Finder windows have an "up" button? I know you have the drop-down with the steps in the path to the current forlder, but a button to go to the parent folder would be nice. I can't see why they don't have one.

      Button? No. Shortcut? Yes. Use Command-up (arrow) to go to a parent directory. If you use Column View (and it's the best), using arrow keys and the keyboard to navigate can be rather efficient compared to the mouse.

      --

    19. Re:BSOD jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe no Linux *distro* is as userfriendly as XP, and that's why my Linux install is very customized. After a day at work, trying hard to make XP do even simple things, it's always great to come home to my Linux machine where I don't have to think about doing things, I just do them. No searching for icons in weird places. No looking for a different way of deleting the "my documents" folder from the desktop, because the most obvious way only made it disappear until the next refresh.

      Linux is more userfriendly than Windows, and has been for years. Unfortunately most distros try very hard to copy the confusing interface found in Windows.

    20. Re:BSOD jokes by martingunnarsson · · Score: 1

      About expose/taskbar:
      If you have 50 windows open in XP you can either use taskbar grouping or simply make the task bar bigger. I can see your point though, the Windows taskbar is most useful when you have 20 windows or so, which is almost always the case for most users I think. I like expose, but I never use it, I'm not sure why. I think one reason is because I don't remember which button is connected to which function, so I usually have to try a couple of them until the windows to what I want them to. Mapping it to an extra mouse button sounds like a good idea, but I only have a one-button mouse. Perhaps I can map it to my PowerMate? I'll play around a bit with it

      About uninstalling:
      You can throw away an application in Windows too, but it might leave a bunch of stuff behind, and you don't want that. It's exactly the same thing in OS X. Sure, just throw the application away, but it might still leave stuff behind. I REALLY like that .app-files are essentially a folder though, makes installation so painless. Wouldn't it be great if applications could store all their stuff inside themselves, instead of placing stuff in system folders? It feels like Apple only got half way through with this idea. Installation is sweet, uninstallation isn't.

      About the menus:
      The only reason I like to have one menu bar in every window is that you can go directly from another window's menu, without activating it first. With one single menu you have to move the mouse, then click to activate the other application, then move the mouse again and then open the menu. In Windows you can just click the other application's menu (provided you can see it) and it opens right up.

      About the up-button:
      Since there is a shortcut, why not add a button connected to that function?? Not even an optional one? It doesn't make sense. I think a lot of Windows users miss this button in OS X.

      --
      Martin
    21. Re:BSOD jokes by DuctTape · · Score: 1
      Now I like BSOD jokes as much as the next person but seriously I think that's one area we can atleast applaud Microsoft at. It's really quite a rare date (or an indication of hardware failure) to see a BSOD in Windows XP. Now those damned security issues on the other hand...

      Sorry, dude, but I'm on my fourth reinstall of XP since I get so far installing drivers, etc., and then I get an unrecoverable stop (just try to get past a REGISTRY_ERROR stop that doesn't even allow you to run the rescue). The last stop was right after installing SP2. When I installed Fedora Core to do a sanity check, it ran fine. Too bad I have to go back to XP for the games.

      DT

      --
      Is this thing on? Hello?
    22. Re:BSOD jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now I like BSOD jokes as much as the next person but seriously I think that's one area we can atleast applaud Microsoft at. It's really quite a rare date (or an indication of hardware failure) to see a BSOD in Windows XP.

      True. It just reboots or shuts down instead now.

    23. Re:BSOD jokes by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      When XP came out I saw plenty of them - Creative had rather flaky drivers at the time and XP crashed about as often as 98 did...

      BTW, I have somewhat recently switched to Linux/KDE after using Microsoft OSes since MS-DOS 6.22... And I actually find it easier to use than Windows. Especially when changing some obscure settings I find it easier to edit /etc/somefine than to run regedit and change an undocumented parameter in HKLM\Software\Microsoft\MS-DOS\Current Version\Microsoft Windows NT\5.1\This space intentionally left blank\MSNBC\CMD\{42789254:56789ABC:DEADBEEF:0900MS FT}.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    24. Re:BSOD jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're just lucky, imo. I've never experienced BSODs on my machines.

    25. Re:BSOD jokes by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 1

      I spent 12 straight hours on saturday trying to help my brother with his XP machine.

      He wanted to use it to play games, had spent a bunch of cash on good hardware, etc... and had spent the last 3 months enlisting help from various skilled support-type geek friends to try and stop it crashing.


      Situations like this are common, but you can't blame XP for it. I've had similar problems with different OSes, including Linux. The general problem is that PCs are complex beasts. All it takes is one slightly flaky bit of hardware to cause headaches. I used to have a PC that randomly locked up, especially when playing games. It turned out that there was something not obviously flaky about my Radeon 9800 that did this. All of the usual suspects checked out. Swapping in a different Radeon 9800 card fixed my problems. But could I blame Windows or Microsoft for this? No. But it does make owning a PC pretty frustrating. Ah, to have a PC with the reliability of a game console...

    26. Re:BSOD jokes by ignavus · · Score: 1

      You're right: you don't *see* many BSODs any more. Microsoft has hidden the BSOD so that Windows XP can reboot "silently" without changing the screen.

      Great way to fool people that the OS is more stable.

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
    27. Re:BSOD jokes by unclethursday · · Score: 1
      I like expose, but I never use it, I'm not sure why. I think one reason is because I don't remember which button is connected to which function, so I usually have to try a couple of them until the windows to what I want them to.

      Depending on what type of Mac you are on, they may be mapped somewhat differently. I have only really noticed this on the AlPowerBooks, where the Expose keys have funtions mapped to them (volume, I think). The basic Expose keys are as follows (but can be mapped however you want in System Preferences):

      F9: scale down all open windows to see them all, press again or choose window to go back.

      F10: show all open windows in current application, use Tab to cycle through apps; press again or choose window to go back.

      F11: show desktop, press again to bring windows back.

      You can also map Expose features to the corners of the screens, if you so wish.

      Since I only have a 14" iBook, I use Expose a lot, because my screen real estate is so small. The only thing I've had to get used to for cycling through windows in an app that's open is the use of command + `/~ whereas in windows you alt tab through those as well as other apps.

      I'll give you the menu part, though, being as I'm still not completely used to it in Mac yet, being as I only recently switched (MArch of this year).

      As to the up button, though, it all depends on how you go through Finder. When I go, I am usually going through the parent to the file/folder I want, so hitting the back button in Finder takes me back to the parent. I use it all the time for installing maps/models/skins to Unreal Tournament 2004 when I am not in columned mode.

    28. Re:BSOD jokes by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      Too bad I have to go back to XP for the games.

      Too bad I need to take my transatlantic to get to the neighbour island.
      Dude! Get '95 or 98SE at worst and forget the XP overhead crap!
      Now, after nearly 10 years of hardware development, Windows 95 running on Athlon 2400XP, 1GB RAM, 100GB HDD and some such, finally runs FAST! Why replace it with a system that will be fast in another 10 years?!

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  9. In light of his influences... by harikiri · · Score: 1

    Paint it aqua!

    --
    Man watching 6 MSCE's around a sun box, looks alot like the opening scene's of 2001:space odyssey...
  10. Blue? by Selfbain · · Score: 2, Funny

    They should paint 'IRQL not less or equal' on the side of the building.

    --
    Well, it has never been successfully tested.
    1. Re:Blue? by Siva · · Score: 1

      You know, if they did paint it blue, the obvious reaction would be for some group of students to pull off an MIT-style "hack" to print a full BSOD dump on the side of the building. Or, alternatively, a bunch of fluffy white clouds, with a pixelated gradient bar along the bottom. Or the NT or 2000 "press ctrl-alt-del to login" screen. Or a bunch of desktop icons. Man, it's just asking for it...I hope they do it. :)

      --

      Keyboard not found.
      Press F1 to continue.
  11. Why doesn't Bill Gates blow more of his money? by comwiz56 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why doesn't Bill gates run around spending money on fun stuff? NSYNC guys almost buy a trip a to space. Woz has like 20 segways (and plays on a segway plo team). But why doesnt Bill Gates spend his money on such crazy things?

    1. Re:Why doesn't Bill Gates blow more of his money? by Mskpath3 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Some interesting info on the far reaching economic impacts Gates would have if he spent truly large amounts of his fortune

      Gates is to be commended for this. He's no slouch when it comes to spreading the wealth around.

    2. Re:Why doesn't Bill Gates blow more of his money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lack of imagination?

      He does spend wods of cash on charity. Of course he got all that cash from us! If you want to buy a laptop from a major manufacturer, good luck finding a non-microsoft OS in it. And all those near zero cost donations to schools - get em while they're young says Mr Gates..

    3. Re:Why doesn't Bill Gates blow more of his money? by khendron · · Score: 2, Informative

      Apparently you haven't yet seen his $97M house.

      --
      Life is like a web application. Sometime you need cookies just to get by.
    4. Re:Why doesn't Bill Gates blow more of his money? by rokzy · · Score: 1

      I skim read it, came to "Gates is phenomenally good at pleasing consumers". that's enough of that... /close tab

    5. Re:Why doesn't Bill Gates blow more of his money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That article would be more interesting if it talked about the anti-free market effects of copyright law, or how a free market is affected by a monopolist.

      I believe in free markets too but it helps to actually have a correct model of the world in your head, not a simplistic view of things.

    6. Re:Why doesn't Bill Gates blow more of his money? by oskard · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "giving away money effectively is almost as hard as earning it the first place."
      -Bill Gates

      Great quote, interesting article, not sure if I agree with it entirely, but the quote gives a cool perspective.

      By the way the Bill & Melinda Society (or whatever) do a lot for charities, students, colleges, and NPO's.

      --
      Sigs are for Terrorists.
    7. Re:Why doesn't Bill Gates blow more of his money? by iamacat · · Score: 1

      This article implies that Microsoft needs $60B AND the value of their own stock to work on an OS and a Word Processor. Some companies are managing to create great things with more than 10 times less money.

      I bet Bill can easily give out $30B by selling stock and donating very slowly to avoid market panic. A surgeon shouldn't sell his scalpel, but he doesn't really need a thousand of them. If he donated to oranizations that promote world peace and are capable to achieve results (which he may be able to judge better than the rest of us, with his indisputable business talent), wonderful things could happen.

    8. Re:Why doesn't Bill Gates blow more of his money? by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Article is silly. If he sells substantial amounts of his stock he doesn't really directly affect Microsoft the company. He affects the shareholders - as their shares will likely be worth less.

      Of course the major shareholders could be pissed off, or the other people take it as a negative sign, but that's all dependent on other things as well.

      As for the claim that "all business decisions are made to impress consumers", that's a joke right?

      It would have made more sense if he argued from the point of view that if someone did pump in billions of cash to somewhere, it could generate inflationary or unbalanced effects. Example: when tons of foreigners (UN etc) went to East Timor, they affected the local economy - the prices of some local goods went up, the poorer locals could not afford the prices of some goods.

      e.g. if Bill Gates started spending 20 billion and was willing to buy everyday ALL the sandwiches in the world for USD100 each, the rest of us won't be able to afford sandwiches, and many of us would start selling sandwiches ;). Then when he stops spending, many sandwich makers have to find new jobs.

      It's like introducing a new abundant energy source to an environment - a new ecosystem often starts around it.

      --
    9. Re:Why doesn't Bill Gates blow more of his money? by adamruck · · Score: 1

      I read that whole article, that was possibly the dumbest thing I have ever heard.

      ask what would happen to the wealth of the nation if, say, a gifted neurosurgeon liquidated his physical assets--his scalpels, his diagnostic machines, his examining rooms--and gave the resulting monies to the Sierra Club or to United Nations agencies.

      Administrators at these agencies would be better off, but society would be poorer because this gifted neurosurgeon stripped himself of the tools he needs to do for others what he is proven to do best.


      This example is stupid. There is a difference between donating wealth that you have accumulated and donating the tools/resources you need to do your job.

      Im pretty sure in Bills case he has a hefty amount of personal wealth.

      Somehow I have a feeling that if Bill Gates donated a load of money it would not reduce microsofts ability to produce and market software. Im not saying that he should donate 30 billion like the article says, but 20 million really is a drop in the bucket.

      --
      Selling software wont make you money, selling a service will.
    10. Re:Why doesn't Bill Gates blow more of his money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Bill is such a nice guy and, and we all know how he always thinks of other people's wishes before his... ...to quote the ineffable Bill Cosby, "Riiiiiiiight."

    11. Re:Why doesn't Bill Gates blow more of his money? by euxneks · · Score: 1

      You'll notice that both of your examples require some amount of physical activity??

      I don't think Bill Gates is exactly the pinnacle of physical health.

      --
      in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
    12. Re:Why doesn't Bill Gates blow more of his money? by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      Been watching TSS? hehe

    13. Re:Why doesn't Bill Gates blow more of his money? by Tarwn · · Score: 1

      Thanks for that link, I've always wondered what his house was like...very very cool. Guess I sould start saving my money now...only about 5 centuries to go :P

      --
      Whee signature.
    14. Re:Why doesn't Bill Gates blow more of his money? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      with more than 10 times less money
      Is that the same as "with less than a tenth of the money"?
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    15. Re:Why doesn't Bill Gates blow more of his money? by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Isn't that the construction project that caused the town to dump Windows for Linux to handle the load?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  12. Why he's really doing it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    He just wants control of their water-walking robots. No bathtub will be safe!

    1. Re:Why he's really doing it by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Clearly he wants to assimilate their special feet onto his borg-like body in his quest to be bigger than Jesus!

  13. Microsoft at CMU by generic-man · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Funny thing about Carnegie Mellon -- there's a lot of people there who spell Microsoft with a dollar sign and refer to it as the "evil empire," yet every Microsoft presentation is standing-room only. There are plenty of people there that actually respect Microsoft as a company, and of course President Jared Cohon was more than happy to accept a $20 million gift.

    Now the Gates Center is a $50+ million project. If you want to name the building in your honor instead, you could always kick in the rest of the dough.

    --
    For more information, click here.
    1. Re:Microsoft at CMU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How ironic. Don't forget how Carnegie made his vast fortunes and then decided to donated a boat load of cash to education and scientific institutes. http://www.achehtimes.com/art-humanity/dungeness.h tm Dungeness and Lifestyle of Andrew Carnegie

      Looking for a Flatscreen? http://www.freeflatscreens.com/default.aspx?refere r=8312933

    2. Re:Microsoft at CMU by bit01 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Microsoft presentation is standing-room only.

      Reminds me of the crusty old Republican grandpa that attended all the Democrat conventions. His reason? "Just ta keep ma disgust afresh"

      Attendence does not imply support. I'd probably attend such presentations. Anyway, like all good universities CMU supports a variety of viewpoints, not the mono-culture that M$ would like to impose.

      ---

      It's wrong that an intellectual property creator should not be rewarded for their work.
      It's equally wrong that an IP creator should be rewarded too many times for the one piece of work, for exactly the same reasons.
      Reform IP law and stop the M$/RIAA abuse.

    3. Re:Microsoft at CMU by register_ax · · Score: 1
      Funny thing about Carnegie Mellon -- there's a lot of people there who spell Microsoft with a dollar sign and refer to it as the "evil empire,"

      Hmm, not to try turn this political or go off-topic, but when you said that I thought of Iraq and how there is a lot of people there (and in the region) who spell United States similarily and also refer to it as the "evil empire." Perhaps it is all relative, but I think MS's motives might run in parallel to what the United States did to Iraq. Dismantling hate in the middle of a region of where that hate resides might work in both situations it seems. What with geeks "looking up to" CM and anti-US sentiment stemming from that whole middle-eastern region. Of course $20 million is a bit different than $87 (300?) billion.

    4. Re:Microsoft at CMU by Jerf · · Score: 1

      Funny thing about Carnegie Mellon -- there's a lot of people there who spell Microsoft with a dollar sign and refer to it as the "evil empire," yet every Microsoft presentation is standing-room only.

      Damn it, I demand that people keep themselves properly pigeonholed! If you go to Carnegie Mellon, that simply ought to be enough for me to know 100% reliably how you feel about Microsoft, UNIX, and gay marriage!

      I shouldn't have to deal with a world where some people who go to Carnegie Mellon love Microsoft, some people hate them, and someone for everything in between. That makes me think. I shouldn't have to think! That is very inconsiderate of the staff and faculty of Carnegie Mellon.

      Take Slashdot; that's how it should work. Everyone loves Linux, thinks BSD is dying, hates Microsoft no matter what, and thinks IP should be completely abolished. Nice and comfy like. Slashdot cares about making sure I don't burn out my noggin trying to understand a complicated world.

      Stay in your pigeonholes, people. Anything less and I shall be very disappointed in you. Square pegs should go in square holes, and round pegs in round holes, that's what I always say.

    5. Re:Microsoft at CMU by Dirtside · · Score: 1
      Funny thing about Carnegie Mellon -- there's a lot of people there who spell Microsoft with a dollar sign and refer to it as the "evil empire," yet every Microsoft presentation is standing-room only.
      Are you sure the people crowding the MS presentations are the same ones who claim to hate MS otherwise? Maybe it's Howard Stern syndrome -- used to be that the people who spent the most time listening to his show per day were the ones who hated him the most. I guess they got off on the outrage. Could be the same deal.

      Or it could just be that CMU is a school really, really into computers, and so there's lots of MS haters AND MS boosters there -- enough to fill a presentation hall when MS shows up, and enough more to bash MS the rest of the time.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    6. Re:Microsoft at CMU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So let's have everyone in Slashdot contribute to other 30 million dollars and have the building called:

      Slashdot
      News for Neds. Stuff that matters.

      Cheers.

      P.S.: We could contribute also to have it named Linus Torvalds, and I am serious

    7. Re:Microsoft at CMU by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      and so there's lots of MS haters AND MS boosters there -- enough to fill a presentation hall when MS shows up, and enough more to bash MS the rest of the time.
      This is slashdot. Your logic is not welcome here.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    8. Re:Microsoft at CMU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except money was supposed to "flow out of Iraq" and the real reason we went there was to secure american oil interests so when we hit peak oil next year, the impact to the american lifestyle will be minimized.

      If you put the entire Iraq situation under that light, it all suddenly makes sense.

      Creepy, no?

    9. Re:Microsoft at CMU by abb3w · · Score: 1
      P.S.: We could contribute also to have it named Linus Torvalds, and I am serious

      To be really egregiously cruel, and to make sure Billy doesn't take back his money, you should ask for it to be named for both: the Gates-Torvalds Center for Computer Science. Hey, Bill gave first, even if his share is less we should let him keep top, er, bill. I'm sure they'd both be ecstatic to have their names so associated, and would doubtless be delighted to speak at the opening ceremonies. =)

      --
      //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
    10. Re:Microsoft at CMU by abb3w · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Microsoft presentation is standing-room only.
      Reminds me of the crusty old Republican grandpa that attended all the Democrat conventions. His reason? "Just ta keep ma disgust afresh"
      Keep your freinds close, and your enemies closer.

      --
      //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
    11. Re:Microsoft at CMU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your sarcasm takes too long to read and is not funny.

  14. Wasting money by Manip · · Score: 1

    If they are so short on money that they need an external investor to pay for the new building then why are they suggesting wasting some by painting it blue? Keep in mind we are talking about $1000~2000 for a paint job alone.

    Not to mention the new color scheme would be very quickly hated and could even be a hazard to aircraft (they might not see it!)

    1. Re:Wasting money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $2000 to paint a building large enough to be a hazard to aircraft?

  15. Gates will be the Carnegie of the 22nd century by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    By the time he's dead, there will be so many buildings with his name on them, he'll be everywhere, like all the towns with Carnegie libraries today. And like Carnegie, he'll be remembered fondly for all the stuff he did that still endures, and not for the things Slashdot likes to bash him for today.

    Like it or not...

    1. Re:Gates will be the Carnegie of the 22nd century by Democritus2 · · Score: 0

      Actually Hershey PA is like that. Or whatever the hell the real name of the town is. You see the Milton Hershey Memorial library. The Hershey Fire department, etc etc. The guy is everywhere.

      --

      no god is good

    2. Re:Gates will be the Carnegie of the 22nd century by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or... we'll have things in his name torn down like the toppling of Saddam's statues. people will rejoice.

    3. Re:Gates will be the Carnegie of the 22nd century by Patik · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's funny what can be accomplished with money. You can just pay to cover up your dirty deeds.

    4. Re:Gates will be the Carnegie of the 22nd century by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      And if his company didn't help destroy other companies and their innovative products through illegal means, then there would have been many other philanthropic individuals who could donate to many causes.

      I'm pretty sure anyone with a little bit of education knows that Carnegie was an asshole. Excuse me while I go take a leak in Carnegie Lake.

    5. Re:Gates will be the Carnegie of the 22nd century by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Yep. Carnegie will be remembered for the Diplodocus, and Gates for Clippy.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    6. Re:Gates will be the Carnegie of the 22nd century by AlgebraicSpore · · Score: 1

      Whenever I hear of Carnegie it is about how he oppressed his workers and had a massive trust which was unhealthy for the economy. I am not verry researched in this area and so I am not asserting this as fact, merely what I hear.

    7. Re:Gates will be the Carnegie of the 22nd century by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So they'll forget his life sentence in prison he's gonna receive for creating Windows?

    8. Re:Gates will be the Carnegie of the 22nd century by FearUncertaintyDoubt · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Bill Gates is the John D. Rockerfeller of his day. A guy who engaged in massive monopolistic practices to build the world's most immense fortune, only to give most of it away. Each took a fledgling industry (petroleum and PCs) and made them into corporate behemoths (Standard Oil and Microsoft) through shrewdness and ruthless business practices, crushing rivals with every dirty trick possible. Rockerfeller regularly hired employes from his competitors as spies to give him inside information that he would then use to destroy his competition. Both Rockerfeller and Gates were/are completely unrepentant for their deeds, and believed they had done nothing wrong but follow the best policies of good business.

      John D. Rockerfeller Jr. (John D.'s son) was the guy who actually spent a great deal of the money, and the one who had a passion for it; John D. had one passion -- the Standard Oil business. It took a generation for people to forget the Rockerfeller name stood for vicious anti-competitive trusts which left human wreckage in its wake, and turn the Rockerfeller name into one that meant philanthropy. Gates is managing that within a generation, although he did not have to start out in the public relations hole John D. did. Gates, however vilified he is by the slashdot crowd, has been more a hero to the average American. America once despised its capitalist masters. Now we lionize them.

      The Rockerfellers did not follow Carnegie's lead. Carnegie took a lot of criticism for his rather shameless self-promotion. Rockerfeller had a strict religious upbringing and considered giving a duty, one that was its own reward, and was not meant for glorifying oneself. You'll see Gates memorial this-or-that here and there, but for the most part, it doesn't look like Bill Gates is interested in having lots of things named after him.

      History will be very forgiving to Bill Gates. People today think anti-trust legislation is some sort of government power trip to stifle progress, not a vital safeguard that restrained some of the most brutal machinery of captialism ever unleashed. Rockerfeller was shunned and vilified by the presidents and other politicians of his day, and now he's considered a great benefactor to mankind. How much more is Gates going to be remembered as the great success story who gave his money for the good of others? Any blemishes on his character will be easily waved away as jealous competitors, not anyone with a serious grief.

      Another interesting note: the guy that John D. first hired to be his chief for philanthropy was named Frederick Gates.

    9. Re:Gates will be the Carnegie of the 22nd century by Dirtside · · Score: 1
      America once despised its capitalist masters. Now we lionize them.
      Reminds me of a joke I heard.

      A poor American looks up at the rich man's mansion on the hill, and says, "One day, I'll be that bastard."

      A poor Irishman looks up at the rich man's mansion on the hill, and says, "One day, I'll kill that bastard."

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    10. Re:Gates will be the Carnegie of the 22nd century by omahajim · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Bill Gates is the John D. Rockerfeller of his day.

      Slashdot needs to revise the moderation system to allow scores higher than 5. Too large a number of the 5:Funny or 5:Interesting posts are not nearly as deserved of their scores as the parent above are. There truly needs to be a next level, above the simply cutesy posts.

    11. Re:Gates will be the Carnegie of the 22nd century by botik32 · · Score: 1
      According to John Taylor Gatto's book, both Rockefeller and Carnegie were the initiators of dumbing out of the American schools at the beginning of the 20th century:

      By 1917, the major administrative jobs in American schooling were under the control of a group referred to in the press of that day as "the Education Trust." The first meeting of this trust included representatives of Rockefeller, Carnegie, Harvard, Stanford, the University of Chicago, and the National Education Association. The chief end, wrote Benjamin Kidd, the British evolutionist, in 1918, was to "impose on the young the ideal of subordination."

      You may read the whole book at: http://www.johntaylorgatto.com/underground/toc1.ht m

    12. Re:Gates will be the Carnegie of the 22nd century by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      Any blemishes on his character will be easily waved away as jealous competitors, not anyone with a serious grief.

      Of course. Alexander of Macedonia is called "The Great" though he was a conquerer. Aberham Lincoln is known as having preserved the union despite the fact that the South voted to succeed. Qin (Sp?) is lionized for making the Hanzi the universal written language of China, despite being a conquerer. Many people were against the cost of the space program before it was spent but no historian is going to say that the money should have been spent on social services.

      The winners write the history books, and the winners are almost always forgiven, with the benefits of their acomplishments noted and the costs often ignored. Whatever your feelings about Gates in particular, I think that praise from Historians is not the same as 'justice in our day.'

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    13. Re:Gates will be the Carnegie of the 22nd century by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      John D. Rockerfeller Jr. (John D.'s son)


      No shit? His son, really?
    14. Re:Gates will be the Carnegie of the 22nd century by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How much more is Gates going to be remembered as the great success story who gave his money for the good of others? Any blemishes on his character will be easily waved away as jealous competitors, not anyone with a serious grief.

      I think I speak for quite a few people when I say that I really don't care, as long as the computers a generation from now aren't locked into end-to-end Microsoft products. Business historians remember Carnegie and Rockefeller as robber barons; they'll remember Gates as a robber baron too, and that's good enough for me. While it's a bit sad that Microsoft made the bulk of the money from the PC revolution while doing almost none of the innovation, as a computer enthusiast I just want their crappy software to be gone (or at least non-monopoly) by the time my kids are in college.

      --
      Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
  16. Unfortunately.... by One+Louder · · Score: 4, Funny

    Unfortunately none of the doors have locks and all of the windows are wide open by default.

    1. Re:Unfortunately.... by Joey+Patterson · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately none of the doors have locks and all of the windows are wide open by default.

      In that case, I think someone should invest money into having some fire foxes guard the building.

    2. Re:Unfortunately.... by abb3w · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately none of the doors have locks

      Not true. The rooms with movie projection equipment and music sound systems are all kept tightly under lock and key from anyone who wants to use them.

      --
      //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  17. Beatch Please! by cdtoad · · Score: 1, Interesting

    $20Million to CMU? Please Bill... Couldn't you have done something a bit more charitable? Like the students at CMU need a new building? How bout helping out the children of Cleveland Ohio of whom 53% are living in poverty. Half the school buildings here would be condemed if it weren't for the fact that 87 of the 100 building inspectors were laid off last year. And who do we have to thank? Queen Jane. But thanks Bill, thanks for giving unNeedy spoilded rich kids a chance.

    --
    when they ban enctryption only criminals wi$21*J *#JF$%!@#$':
    1. Re:Beatch Please! by Antithetical · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You mean like the Gates Foundation (http://www.gatesfoundation.org/default.htm)
      wher e he basically gave away almost 1.2 billion last year? Is half a billion for education plus half a billion for world health enough?

    2. Re:Beatch Please! by xombo · · Score: 1

      But consider which institution will churn out more Microsoft-bound employees.

      Bill isn't in it JUST for being charitable when he can be in it to attract qualified employees capable of churning out more products and ideas.

    3. Re:Beatch Please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.

      This is Slashdot. We won't be satisfied until Microsoft goes into debt to finance our highly socialist agenda. Anything less deserves terrorism.

    4. Re:Beatch Please! by aeroz3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You've got to be kidding me? I'm not spoiled. I'm not rich by any means, I am at CMU because I work my ASS off.
      I made a conscious decision in my life to work hard and stay in school because I knew what it meant for my future. So who is it that really DESERVES it more? Is it the people who are the best and the brightest and have worked their asses off to show it; the ones who will be changing the world? Or is it another 15 year old mother of 2 who thought her baby-daddy jamal had a better future as a crack dealer than he could have if he stayed in school. I love the concept that if you are capable, you should be shat upon. I hope that someday, YOU, cdtoad get to live in a world where everything is designed by this lowest common denominator you love so much. Cars? Nope. Computers, of course not! Light bulbs??? Hell no. These folks are not the ones who are driving society and innovation. I'll stick with beleiving in hard work, wise decisions, and innovation personally.

    5. Re:Beatch Please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      WTF? The guy give 20 million, and folks get upset because it doesn't go to THEIR charity of choice. Sigh...

      This could have gone back into the Microsoft Warchest... would that have been a better option?

    6. Re:Beatch Please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Donations to higher education can improve the productivity of the economy, thereby improving the situation for all. They are not an invalid method of improving society.

      That said, Gates does not only donate to CMU; in fact one of his recent charitable projects is specifically targeted at setting up an improved high-school level school system for talented kids in impoverished neighborhoods.

    7. Re:Beatch Please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Are you a COMPLETE idiot? Don't you know *anything* about the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation?

      http://www.gatesfoundation.org/default.htm
      http ://www.cnn.com/2004/HEALTH/conditions/07/15/ga tes.aids.ap/

      etc

    8. Re:Beatch Please! by Skudd · · Score: 1

      I have to agree with cdtoad. Funding science is a wonderful thing, but who is it going to benefit when everyone is broke and/or dead? That money would be of much better use in the large sector of the country that can't afford health insurance.

    9. Re:Beatch Please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you have to work your ass off in crumbling public school filled with gang members and one teacher for every 40 kids? Maybe people think they have a better future as a crack dealer because in those kind of neighborhoods that's true!

      Oh, no, that's right you come from some priviledged white school out in the suburbs. Gee, it's so miraculous that you were able to overcome those hardships!

    10. Re:Beatch Please! by King_of_Crunk · · Score: 1

      Hey I'm one of those. A poor 30 year old kid, unemployed computer geek, living in poverty near but not quite in Cleveland...

      I agree shoot me some money Bill!!!

      I swear to charish and love Microsoft and it's produccts forever and ever honestly.

      Down with Linux!
      Microsoft forever!

      See I will keep to my word honestly

    11. Re:Beatch Please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding me? ARE YOU JOKING?

      Gates donates moeny to Africa [http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/africa]

      Gates donated 750 million. Almost a good billion dollars for Africa. Africa pwns Ohio anyday of the week when it comes down to needyness. You idiot.

    12. Re:Beatch Please! by njko · · Score: 1

      everybody is a very nice person with the money of other people

      --
      \n.\n
    13. Re:Beatch Please! by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1
      Jesus, shut your fucking trap. Many people in the top schools in this nation didn't come from privileged white suburbs. Plenty of people who grew up in lower and lower middle class surroundings and worked their asses off. Some of us value education and success because our families raise us that way regardless of our financial background. Yes I did go to a school not that far off from what you describe for several years (junior high school and first year of high school) before finally going to a private school when my family could afford it. I knew kids in college whose family circumstances were so messed up or were so poor they had been living on the streets in high school at times.


      Just look at the kids of many immigrant families who grow up quite poor yet still end up highly motivated and successful. Just because the kids in the ghetto don't seem to understand the obvious (that academic success and achievement is a guaranteed way to a better life), don't go raging around at everybody else acting like we're all so damned spoiled or our lives have been perfect and wonderful.

    14. Re:Beatch Please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In this instance, Bill Gates may be just "giving unNeedy spoilded [sic] rich kids a chance," but you also have to remember that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (http://www.gatesfoundation.org/) has given away over $7 Billion. Most of the money goes towards global health improvements for the neediest of people all around the world. I'd say that after a contribution that large to all the needy people of the world, Bill should be entitled to spend less than half a percent of his donations encouraging some of the smartest students in the world to go into computer science.

    15. Re:Beatch Please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Bill Gates is presently worth $29.83 Billion. $1.2 Billion is just north of 5% of Bill's net worth. Put another way: $1.2 Billion is less than Bill Gates could make on the interest on his net worth.

      Let's play a game. Microsoft recently began issuing dividends on shares. A Microsoft share presently is about $28. The initial special dividend was $3 per share. Assuming this continues and is yearly, dividends are about 10%. Thus Bill just made about $3 Billion on the special dividend. That will pay for over two years of philanthropy. Considering the huge tax breaks for that philanthropy (around 40%) this could be stretched to 3 years easily.

      Let's put it in another perspective. If Bill stops making money and just pumps $1.2 billion per year into his philanthropic efforts, it'll take him twenty years before he's merely a millionare.

      This isn't philanthropy. It's not charity. It's miserliness in the extreme. I give more money, as a percentage of my income, than Bill does, and trust me, it hurts me a lot more to do so than it does him.

      Oh yeah: Bill also didn't give any money at all until he got married and his wife shamed him into the tiny amount he puts in now.

    16. Re:Beatch Please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't say that CMU CS kids are spoiled. On the contrary, they have been workaholics.

    17. Re:Beatch Please! by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 3, Informative

      I was going to moderate you as flamebait or overrated since I have mod points, but I felt it more important to actually state how your point is so wrong.

      The Bill Gates Foundation donated $10 million to Milwaukee Public Schools this year, in order to help them with their plan of breaking up the large schools and creating smaller ones. The money has facilitated this and the inner city students are already showing increased grades and scores on their standardized tests.

      Without the money, the switch would have taken close to a decade. With the money it will take 2-3 years. His foundation has donated to MANY good causes like this, so who the fuck cares if he gives additional money to CMU?

      You come across as a complete idiot on this one. Gates may be a ruthless businessman with illegal business practices, but his charitable giving is above and beyond what every other billionaire gives.

      --
      You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
    18. Re:Beatch Please! by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Bill Gates is presently worth $29.83 Billion. $1.2 Billion is just north of 5% of Bill's net worth. Put another way: $1.2 Billion is less than Bill Gates could make on the interest on his net worth.

      So? Many, many, people (actually -- most) don't donate at all, even if they have the money.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    19. Re:Beatch Please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And billions more were paid in licensing fees, service contracts, etc. by schools and hospitals around the world...Bill Gates and philanthropy...oh, please, I can't think of a better oxymoron.

  18. In a Related Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In a Related Story,

    At the Borland Conference in San Jose this week, Borland gave CMU a check for $1M. They must be doing something right at CMU!

    1. Re:In a Related Story by Knytefall · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not exactly a check -- just free software. Check out the press release.

  19. CMU is an Excellent School by I_Love_Pocky! · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm always afraid of huge corporate donations to CS departments, because they tend to want to push the program in a certain direction. I don't think it helps anyone to have a Microsoft centric CS education, because CS shouldn't be about practical implementations, but rather theoretical concepts. I hope CMU isn't tainted by this donation.

    I'm not just getting down on Microsoft either, I would feel wary about any large software company. On the other hand, it is a very nice thing for Mr. Gates to do. I'm always impressed by the really great things he and his wife choose to do with all of that money.

    1. Re:CMU is an Excellent School by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How come good things always happen after I leave my school? First, CMU got $150M for the b-school (now called Tepper). Now, the CS department got $20M for the new building. People must have been really watching me and waited until I graduated! Oh well...

    2. Re:CMU is an Excellent School by LeahofRivendell · · Score: 1

      I am a student at CMU and so far from what I can tell, there are no signs of it changing. Most of the professors have the view on OS that there is no "perfect" OS. They all get in your way in different fashions. Our first programming course is primarily taught on macs, and later we will probably use unix. Also, making all of the software that we use compatible with every system was a painstaking process that the will not likely undo.

    3. Re:CMU is an Excellent School by failedlogic · · Score: 1

      I'm concerned that Gates might use his influence on the CS department to use MS products. Not afraid. You highlight your concern of "huge corporate donations"... but I am afraid of the influence the pharmaceutical industry has on pharmacists, doctors and psychologists.

      Similarly though, post-secondary education should not teach theories on company-centric models. What happens if said comapny ceases to exist ... is the education then rendered non-marketable?

    4. Re:CMU is an Excellent School by killjoe · · Score: 1

      That's the situation today. It will be interesting to see what happens four or five years from now. Why do you think Bill Gates gave them that money?

      --
      evil is as evil does
    5. Re:CMU is an Excellent School by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You make a very good point. I think the big problem with the medical situation is that people who haven't been involved much with it tend to see it as populated by crusaders against disease, instead of by people just as corruptable/lazy as anyone else. And once you do get close enough to really grasp what's going on, it's too late, there's really nothing you can do except change carreer paths. Number one rule in looking for a doctor, check to see if he'll take into consideration case studies from respected medical journals if you bring them in. Most will just go with whatever the 'standard' is, basically the drug company with the largest advertising budget. I'm sympathetic to the difficulties in keeping up with the latest research, but I really think it should go along with the job more often than it ends up doing.

    6. Re:CMU is an Excellent School by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent school? What about that crappy university funded newspaper that prints racist comments? For being ranked #1 in political apathy by Princeton Review, it must have taken a lot to get so many people protesting.

    7. Re:CMU is an Excellent School by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. It's a conflict of interest, and as a CS student it's beginning to bother me.
      MIT recently received millions from Bill Gates to name one of the towers in the Stata Center for him. Perhaps not coincidentially, the first really public-accessible WINATHENA stations - MIT's first academic computing machines to use Windows instead of a UNIX-based operating system - are now nicely placed in the Gates building's lobby.
      (Yes, I know the WINAthena projected existed before then, but it was always an experimental cluster buried deep in 37 until the Gates building got done...suspicious to me.)

    8. Re:CMU is an Excellent School by I_Love_Pocky! · · Score: 1

      I don't know anything about that. I meant that it is an excellent CS school.

    9. Re:CMU is an Excellent School by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bulk of CMU students are very quick to protest stupid shit. The way students reacted to that was kind of funny. You had a bunch of them crowing that the comic in question was somehow deep intellectual commentary (it wasn't; it was an un-funny hack job done in a hurry and supposedly approved in a hurry). Another bunch wanted to drag the whole tartan editorial board before the university's star chamber court and get them kicked out of school.

    10. Re:CMU is an Excellent School by Nept · · Score: 1

      You remember this story from /., correct?

      Excerpt:
      The true purpose of schooling, according to Gatto, is to produce an easily manageable workforce to serve employers in a mass-production economy

      --
      "Teachers leave us kids alone ..." - Roger Waters, Pink Floyd
  20. Cheapskate by gorbachev · · Score: 5, Informative

    Brown University got $100M today. Bill's cheap! :)

    --
    In Soviet Russia, I ruled you
    1. Re:Cheapskate by captnitro · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The donation was made by one Sidney Frank, whose importation popularization of drinks we were fond of in college (and still are) made him lots of cash.

      It's a good day to be a college dropout, apparently.

      It makes me a little proud to think that you can still work hard and with a little luck have your name on a building, regardless of things like educational status or initial wealth. This applies more to Sidney, I suppose, than Bill. (Now, the fact that it was a half-stolen, poorly written OS and liquor sales to college kids is quite another thing, and I'm sure everybody's going to remember that in replies to this post. Have fun!)

    2. Re:Cheapskate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, and Sidney Frank (same guy) already gave Brown $20 mill for a new building prior to that. His business? Importing liquor. Namely Jaeger.

    3. Re:Cheapskate by SansTinfoilHat · · Score: 1

      Brown University got $100M today. Bill's cheap! :)

      Brown's Endowment is $1,484,292,000.
      CMU's Endowment is approximately $756,000,000.
      The schools are approximately the same size.

      I know the parent was joking, but with the sorry state of donations to CMU, $20m is pretty impactful.

      Please note that this is the one time you can feel safe on clicking a link that says "endowment".

    4. Re:Cheapskate by danila · · Score: 1

      But he also gets to name 130 students "Sidney Frank Scholars" each year. Are you sure you want 130 CMU students to be called "Bill Gates Scholars" each year?

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  21. And of course... by nwbvt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    On slashdot someone will complain that this charitable act is just an attempt to push his company's products on college students and the mods will make it +5 insightful.

    --
    Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    1. Re:And of course... by gc8005 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Geez - how lame. This charitable act is just an attempt to push his company's products on college students. Someone mod me up as insightful.

    2. Re:And of course... by nathanh · · Score: 4, Insightful
      On slashdot someone will complain that this charitable act is just an attempt to push his company's products on college students and the mods will make it +5 insightful.

      Even worse, Slashdot will be crapflooded with dozens of people preemptively complaining about the Slashdot bias, and they will be moderated to +5 Insightful as well.

    3. Re:And of course... by register_ax · · Score: 2, Interesting

      lol, morals are human-defined so there is always a "right" and "wrong" and they will always have to be disputed.

      It is unintelligent to not critique an action that will prove directly beneficial to the person partaking in the act. It should be recognized that this industry is the same industry he is in. That is what debate/discussion is, looking at various points of view. Of course slashdot has a slant and to be honest, that's why I come here. I got a lot of the pop perspective from those other moving pieces of matter I happen to bump into in that thing called RealLife. If that comment wasn't made, or yours, I wouldn't be coming here. I like the perspective, not that it's right or wrong mind you. Thanks for your comment.

    4. Re:And of course... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Even worse, Slashdot will be crapflooded with dozens of people preemptively complaining about the Slashdot bias, and they will be moderated to +5 Insightful as well.


      While we are doing meta-moderation anyway, lets see if I can get a +5 Offtopic.
    5. Re:And of course... by ZorbaTHut · · Score: 1

      Even worse, they'll be right. Look through the comments that have been modded up to +5.

      --
      Breaking Into the Industry - A development log about starting a game studio.
    6. Re:And of course... by nwbvt · · Score: 1

      So what, no one mods up posts like this, this, this, this, this, and, well you get the picture.

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    7. Re:And of course... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please, please, please, for the love of God, please stop.
      --
      Sick of pompous windbags? Change "Karma Bonus" modifier (Preferences, Comment Options) to -1 penalty.

  22. This is just too easy by Starji · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Jeez, I hope it doesn't crash

  23. Other building features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. To enter, you push a button and 5 minutes later the door opens
    2. All digital locks can be opened with the admin password 1-2-3-4-5
    3. Vibrating Window panes will cause random crashes
    4. All wall decorations are essential and directly integrated into the building and cannot be removed without destroying the entire structure

    1. Re:Other building features by ValourX · · Score: 2, Funny

      1-2-3-4-5? That's the combination on my luggage!

    2. Re:Other building features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're load-bearing walls, you insensitive clod!

  24. In front of the building... by rasafras · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...you will be greeted by a 20 foot iron sculpture of clippy.

    That, and the building won't have any locks.

    1. Re:In front of the building... by IchBinEinPenguin · · Score: 1

      "Hi, it looks like you're desperatley trying to dodge around me so you can walk into this building ..."

      That's not half as bad as everyone having to close all the windows and leave the building so they can cycle the power ever time someone installs something ...

    2. Re:In front of the building... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      On the contrary, the building will have locks on top of locks, but most of the locks will be easily defeated, and every window will be perpetually open.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:In front of the building... by mlk · · Score: 1

      Which will fall on you.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
  25. No thanks. by kkovach · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'd attend class under a bridge somewhere before I stepped foot in a building bought by Bill.

    --
    The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act.
  26. Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by reporter · · Score: 4, Interesting
    About 10 years ago, Stanford University completed construction of its new computer science building. You can see a picture of it. Several companies and individuals donated money to its construction. The majority of the funds came from a group of Japanese companies. Interestingly, among individuals, Bill Gates donated the largest percentage, and Stanford University named the entire building after him.

    When news of "Gates" becoming the apellation of the building broke, heated discussions appeared on the local university electronic bulletin board. Many people were dismayed that Bill Gates, a college dropout with little knowledge of computer science, would receive the honor of having the computer science building named after him. It is no ordinary building. It is the building housing the pre-eminent computer-science department that is among the top 3 in the nation.

    One mathematics professor lamented that money buys anything -- including undeserved honors. He commented that Stanford University might as well name the building after "Donald Trump" since he is a billionaire.

    Personally, I object to honoring Bill Gates for anything. As far as I am concerned, he is an unethical shmuck who bears principal responsibility for the suicide of Gary Kildall. Search on "Gary Kildall" if you do not know who he is.

    1. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by GeorgeMcBay · · Score: 5, Insightful


      One mathematics professor lamented that money buys anything -- including undeserved honors. He commented that Stanford University might as well name the building after "Donald Trump" since he is a billionaire.


      Your mathematics professor should take a refresher course in logic. Bill Gates paid for most of the building. Donald Trump didn't. See the difference?

      In any case, as long as you have a shiny nice new building on Bill's dime, who gives a crap what it is called? I never gave a second thought to the names on the buildings at my university even though many were named after robberbarons significantly more sinister than Bill Gates has ever been in their day and within their own respective markets.


      As far as I am concerned, he is an unethical shmuck who bears principal responsibility for the suicide of Gary Kildall


      That's funny, I always thought Gary Kildall bore principal responsibility for his own suicide. Isn't that what suicide is?

    2. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
      Your mathematics professor should take a refresher course in logic. Bill Gates paid for most of the building. Donald Trump didn't. See the difference?
      First, the poster clearly stated that Bill Gates did not pay for most of the building. Second, the point of the mathematics professor was that it wouldn't be appropriate to name the building after Donald Trump even if he had payed for most of the building. Hence, it shouldn't be appropriate to name the building after Bill Gates simply because he provided a large chunk of the financing. I hope this clears things up for you.
    3. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Toresica · · Score: 1

      I never gave a second thought to the names on the buildings at my university.

      Nobody's been giving a second thought to the building names at my university either.
      Now there are three buildings named after the same guy, Michael G. DeGroot.
      We're starting to wonder when the university will stop giving out degrees and start giving out DeGroots.

    4. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 2, Funny
      Second, the point of the mathematics professor was that it wouldn't be appropriate to name the building after Donald Trump even if he had payed for most of the building.
      If that's what he meant, maybe he should have said that instead.
      it shouldn't be appropriate to name the building after Bill Gates simply because he provided a large chunk of the financing.
      Why, because an unknown mathematician and an anonymous coward say so?
      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    5. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's funny. What does this line mean then?

      Interestingly, among individuals, Bill Gates donated the largest percentage...

    6. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by ArsSineArtificio · · Score: 5, Interesting
      One mathematics professor lamented that money buys anything -- including undeserved honors. He commented that Stanford University might as well name the building after "Donald Trump" since he is a billionaire.

      All of Stanford University itself is named after a railroad robber baron.

      --
      All employees must wash hands before seeking equitable relief.
    7. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Sorry, but Gary Kildall's inability to make his appointment with IBM and successfully sell his product is what - in addition to Gary's direct actions - caused his suicide.

      Truth is - Gates is a better businessman. He sold an inferior product (than CP/M) to IBM, and built an empire out of it.

      Yep - there's no denying the fact that microsoft's only strong suit has been marketing - the products ALWAYS suck - except for the ROM in the Tandy Model 102 - the last thing Gates wrote.

      Hey, I don't like Gates's products, and I don't like his business style, but this is America, where monopolies and cronyism with politicians is the way you do business - if you don't like it, vote 3rd party - because *any* third party - be them conservative libertarians or reform party members or liberal greens or communist commies are going to clean the stench of corporate controlled politicians.

    8. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by secolactico · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As far as I am concerned, he is an unethical shmuck who bears principal responsibility for the suicide of Gary Kildall. Search on "Gary Kildall" if you do not know who he is.

      I had no idea as to who Gary Kildall was. I did a quick search and found out. The cause of death is not clear tho, but nowhere it says it was suicide.

      Now, I believe you have your reasons to blame Gates for Kildall's death, but in my own humble opinion, nobody is responsible for someone else's suicide. If you take the decision to kill yourself, no external factor is to blame.

      As for "honoring" him by naming the building after him, well, he is paying for it. If the donation comes with strings attached and Stanford doesn't like it, they can always turn him down.

      He might be a college dropout with little knowledge of CS, but he *is* doing something for the field: he is donating resources, just like the person who doesn't know anything about medicine, but donates money for a new hospital wing, or simply gives blood. You contribute with what you can.

      (yes, I know Gates isn't probably doing it out of the goodness of his heart... he is getting publicity for it, but does it really matters so long as the job gets done?)

      --
      No sig
    9. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Moridineas · · Score: 3, Insightful
      You can hate on Gates all you want, as is your right, but to simply describe him as "a college dropout with little knowledge of computer science" is not exactly right. He was in fact a very talented coder in his day--I know this isn't the same as a computer scientist, but quite frankly id rather be a coder any day of the tweek.

      I guess the tought of a top CS building being named for the top software companies top employee doesn't really rankle me that much.

    10. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interestingly, among individuals, Bill Gates donated the largest percentage, and Stanford University named the entire building after him.

      OK OK under your logic name the building "A Group of Japanese Companies" or just AGOJC

    11. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by hazem · · Score: 1

      That's just the way it works.

      You yourself can go to nearly any university, and if you're willing to fatten up an endowment or two and fund the construction of a building, you too can have your name put on that building.

      Sure it's an honor to name the building after Gates, but it's really an empty honor. At least they didn't give him a PhD for ponying up the money.

    12. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by atrizzah · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've never read anything to suggest that Gary Kildall committed suicide at all. Look him up in the all knowing Wikipedia

    13. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by saden1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, his point is computer science buildings should be named after men who given computer science more than they have taken from it. Men who did the research to advance the field. While I admire Bill Gates for his charitable work, I don't think he himself has contributed much to the field of computer science. If the building was for a Business School, by all means name him after Bill Gates.

      --

      -----
      One is born into aristocracy, but mediocrity can only be achieved through hard work.
    14. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why wouldn't it be appropriate to name a university building after Donald Trump? And what does this have to do with Bill Gates?

    15. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by SnowZero · · Score: 1

      Though I don't agree with the great-great-grandparent post, this line makes complete mathematical sense. It's pretty simple actually.

      For example, if Bill Gates donated 30% of the cost, and 5 other donors gave 14% of the cost, then Bill Gates donated the largest percentage. But notice that he paid for less than 50% of the cost, so he didn't pay for "most of the building".

      They estimate the new CMU building will cost $50M, so Gates' donation is 40% in this case, which is also less than half. Whether or not that matters for getting your name on the building is left as an exercise for the philosopher.

    16. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In Bill's defense, the Gates Foundation has probably done more to combat world-crippling diseases (malaria, Aids, TB, etc) than anyone else in history.

      It's the bug-ridden, overpriced, unstable software his company sells - or better put licenses/rents - to you that I think sucks.

      Basically I see gates as the ultimate Robin Hood character - stole billions from the rich corporations of america (individuals usually steal his stuff instead of pay anyway) - and gave huge amounts to the poor.

    17. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I searched on Yahoo! but couldn't find anything. Google on the other hand returned tons of useful results.

    18. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by eV_x · · Score: 1

      "Personally, I object to honoring Bill Gates for anything. As far as I am concerned, he is an unethical shmuck who bears principal responsibility for the suicide of Gary Kildall. Search on "Gary Kildall" if you do not know who he is."

      If you are so naive as to think that Gary Kildall is the first person to be taken advantage of in some way, then I have a bridge to sell you young man.

      Your demonization of Gates is a little extreme. I can think of a lot worse people than some geek who makes geeks mad... Hitler, Slobodan Milosevic, Saddam Hussein. There's many more that have done a lot worse than do things you don't like on computers.

      And who truly cares if a building is named after the person who mostly paid for it? Is it not that person's right? Instead, why don't you pay for it since you feel so strongly about it? I'm much less concerned about a building's name being a person over a corporation.

      And lastly, if a person commits suicide, it's their fault. Giving up only makes you the sucker - you can always take another step, pick yourself up, and win.

    19. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Dirtside · · Score: 4, Insightful
      If you take the decision to kill yourself, no external factor is to blame.
      Not that this is what happened with Gates and Kildall, but if I were to (for example) manipulate a person's life so as to get them fired from their job, bury them under a mountain of debt, cause problems with his marriage, and generally make his life a living hell, and then he committed suicide, you don't think I would bear ANY of the responsibility for it? I certainly do. And lesser actions of mine would similarly bear a smaller, but nonzero, responsibility.

      Saying that external factors cannot affect a person's decision to commit suicide doesn't seem reasonable. It's the same as saying that external factors cannot affect us at all, for any reason. Even if I did the evil things above, I certainly wouldn't be entirely to blame for his suicide (after all, he pulled the trigger, or took the pill, leapt off the bridge, whatever), but if I set up circumstances to the point where he felt like he had no way out, I would be at least partly culpable, by any reasonable moral standard. (I don't know if I could be held legally liable, in a criminal sense, although I probably could be successfully sued in civil court for wrongful death, or somesuch, assuming that his family could provide evidence).

      I don't think that responsibility is always (or even usually) as simple as "one person is completely responsible for this." If a person commits a crime, and if external circumstances can affect that, then that person is still ultimately responsible, but it doesn't mean that we should relieve him of any responsibility and let him off scot-free, NOR does it mean that we should blame him entirely and not take a hard look at what society is doing that might encourage him to be criminal.

      This really is getting off-topic; maybe I'll write a journal entry about it.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    20. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by GileadGreene · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Uh... hate to break it to you, but most campuses name buildings after whoever fronts the cash, not after anyone "inspiring". I find it particularly ironic that this interchange was sparked as a result of discussions at Stanford, which is named for Leland Stanford: not an academic luminary, but a man who made a lot of money in railroads and used that moeny to endow a college.

    21. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never gave a second thought to the names on the buildings at my university even though many were named after robberbarons

      Buildings at our physics department are without exception named after famous physicists who studied or worked at our department. I think this is a good tradition.

    22. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not yahoo! Foolish mortal! Yahoo is bad, don't you know? Google is the cool way to search.

      http://www.google.com/search/?q=Gary+Kildall

    23. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Flibz · · Score: 1

      A long time ago a mate of mine went to Cambridge Polytechnic (Better than a college, worse than a university) had the Jim Bowen bar. Unfortunately, not long after, they renamed it the Nelson Mandela bar...

    24. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by foonf · · Score: 2, Informative

      As far as I am concerned, he is an unethical shmuck who bears principal responsibility for the suicide of Gary Kildall. Search on "Gary Kildall" if you do not know who he is.

      Maybe if you tried a different search engine you would know that the popular legend that he killed himself is not true. He was killed in a fight at a bar, and by all accounts it wasn't the least bit deliberate.

      --

      "(Man) tries to live his own life as if he were telling a story. But you have to choose: live or tell." --Sartre
    25. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if this were an MIT building, it would get assigned a number, and nobody would care.

      The New CS building is 32. (Because it's on the site of Building 20, the new building HAD to be called 32, right? Since 20 in hex is...)

      -mac

    26. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by darnok · · Score: 1

      Although I regard Bill Gates as the leading robber baron of this generation, there is a long tradition of the most successful robber barons making major contributions to education and public works. Although I'm not a USian, I think this has been a significant factor in advancing the US in terms of innovation over a long period.

      Sadly, this tradition seems to have faded somewhat over the last several years, so I applaud Gates for doing his bit and hope he spurs on some comparable acts by his "peers".

      After writing this, I need to take a shower and lie down for a while...

    27. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gary Kildall did not commit suicide...

    28. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as I am concerned, he is an unethical shmuck who bears principal responsibility for the suicide of Gary Kildall.

      I hate to get involved in this old debate, but I've never seen it officially published anywhere that Gary Kildall died of suicide.

      All indications seem to lead towards complications after a head injury sustained in a bar fight.

      Some geek you are. Not only did you provide a link to "do a search" using something other than Google, but on top of that you didn't even do the search yourself to validate your own claims.

      Troll.

    29. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since it was Gary Kildall being stupid enough to go skiing on days when he was supposed to have meetings with IBM, it was definitely his own fault. All Bill Gates did was take advantage of his competitor's mistake - good business sense.

    30. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point. And let's not forget that the C in CMU stands for Carnegie who was another robber baron.

    31. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by ecesar · · Score: 1

      Well, if this were an MIT building, it would get assigned a number, and nobody would care.

      The New CS building is 32.

      You mean the Stata Center, home of the Gates Tower?

    32. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a fucking nut job if you think Bill Gates had anything at all to do with Gary Kildall's unfourtunate suicide. You do a disservice to Gary by using his death in such a cynical manner.

    33. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by CGP314 · · Score: 1

      Search on "Gary Kildall" [yahoo.com] if you do not know who he is.

      Let's try that again, Google or Wikipedia

    34. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by tdemark · · Score: 2, Funny

      If stadiums are any example, I'm sure another $10 million would allow CMU to call it:

      Pepsi Presents the Gates Center for Computer Science

      - Tony

    35. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by elucubra · · Score: 1

      Well, CMU itself is named after a steel baron and a banker...

    36. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To reporter (666905)

      How can you be reached?

      Your email address is not visible.

      Thanks!

    37. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Sage+Gaspar · · Score: 1

      The guy that fronts the cash gets to put stipulations on the projects you undertake with the money. That's just the way it is. From a logistical standpoint, it's certainly not bad for job placement to have a connection to Gates.

      And also, maybe I'm not reading deeply enough between the lines, but every article I've read thus far says that Kildall was killed in some biker bar brawl that got out of control, and wasn't that great of a guy apart from being an excellent computer scientist. Searching "Gary Kildall" + suicide returns pretty much nothing on Kildall besides one or two people referencing Gates as the cause of Kildall's suicide.

    38. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Funny
      I can think of a lot worse people than some geek who makes geeks mad... Hitler, Slobodan Milosevic, Saddam Hussein. There's many more that have done a lot worse than do things you don't like on computers.

      But nobody's naming a building at CMU "Milosevic Hall."

      Then again, it does have a nice ring to it....

    39. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by commodoresloat · · Score: 3, Funny
      He was killed in a fight at a bar, and by all accounts it wasn't the least bit deliberate.

      You mean Bill Gates beat him to death?

    40. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you take the decision to kill yourself, no external factor is to blame.

      Remember those people who jumped from the Twin Towers? It was only 3 years ago you know.

    41. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why did everything Microsoft made become crap as soon as Paul Allen left the company?

      Paul was (is) the techie, Gates doesn't care for anything but money.

    42. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Udo+Schmitz · · Score: 1
      Bill Gates paid for most of the building.

      Uhm, nope. The poster you replied to wrote: "The majority of the funds came from a group of Japanese companies."

      I always thought Gary Kildall bore principal responsibility for his own suicide.

      If you think there are never any outside influences when people kill themself.

    43. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who gives a crap what it is called?

      People who want to live in a meritocracy.

      I never gave a second thought to the names on the buildings at my university even though many were named after robberbarons significantly more sinister than Bill Gates has ever been in their day and within their own respective markets.

      This is why no one respects American University Students these days. You are proud that you "never gave a second thought" to something that is at the very least very interesting.

      What an astonising thing to admit.

    44. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by NanoGator · · Score: 0

      " I don't think he himself has contributed much to the field of computer science."

      I agree, but I'm ignoring the fact that PCs running Windows are now in 10s of millions of homes, thus making computers a common household appliance.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    45. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Yep - there's no denying the fact that microsoft's only strong suit has been marketing - the products ALWAYS suck"

      Maybe Windows 'sucked', but at least it sucked in such a way that millions of non-computer geeks were able to pick it up and use it comfortably. Is it so hard to acknowledge the idea that Microsoft's focus on the end user experience actually had something to do with their success?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    46. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by pjbass · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As much as I am a Linux/open-source advocate, and do not like how Microsoft does its business today, I have a few things to point out about Microsoft and Bill Gates.

      1. How much of KDE and Gnome (now be honest) and any other "popular" window manager for X is trying to mimick the better parts of MS Windows (the only way to take the market is to emulate it, and make it work better)?
      2. Gates and Microsoft, as much as people don't want to admit, drove the PC into the mainstream use for end-user consumers. Microsoft followed others such as DEC, Sun, etc., and had something that ran on hardware of the day for academic and commercial reasons, and then took a leap (albeit Apple was already there in small representation, and Xerox just didn't market their workstation as effectively as MS did), and voila! They made a new market of people who found the usefulness of a computer at home.
      3. Being an avid gamer (in my copious amounts of spare time *grin*), I need to ask this question. Since Bill Gates didn't complete college, you're saying he doesn't know much about computer science, and therefore he really can't contribute to the field. Take John Carmack, as an example. He dropped out of college after 2 semesters. He is the person that video card manufacturers worship in the hopes he uses their architecture to pioneer the next-generation of gaming. Is he someone you'd also consider not contributing to the advance of the computer science world?

      If anything, Gates drove a company that put computer science on the map. There were many before him, and MANY after him, but he really can be credited to be behind the machine that made PC's mainstream. Please put your personal bias aside when posting about things like this. I'm sure if Carmack were to donate money to a college to buy a building, people would think that would just be damn cool, not a hypocrisy to computer science.

    47. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by DenDave · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Don't troll about Mr. Kildall, he was a great man and you all have much to thank him for. Your post sucks ass and so do you.

      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
    48. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by phiwum · · Score: 1

      Now there are three buildings named after the same guy, Michael G. DeGroot.

      What, Michael Hall, the DeGroot Research Institute and the hot new recreational area, the G Spot?

      I suppose three is alright, but if they try to name another, they might run into issues. (Cue "Your name's not Bruce?" jokes.)

      --
      Phiwum's law: anyone that names an obvious law after himself and then puts it in his own sig is just pathetic.
    49. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2, Informative

      A couple counterpoints:

      1. The desktop model of computering is old, really old. There are demos from the late 60's, early 70s. MS lifted its windowing ideas the same place Apple did, from Xerox. Seems everything is initially derived from Xerox.

      2. The home computer didn't hit critical mass until Netscape and the web gave people a real excuse to buy a home computer or two. Especially people who didn't at the time use a computer at work or were otherwise not in the income bracket that allowed for a $2,000+ computer.

    50. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by NanoGator · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Mods: Hit 'reply' instead of 'overrated'.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    51. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      Personally I don't think anyone can rightfully blame Bill for Gary Kildall and quite frankly if Bill is the reason then we should be thankfull. After all a guy who is so envious and jealous of a business opportunity HE let slip that he turns his life to shit and ultimatily dies, well who knows what kind of fucked up corporation that sort of person would create, surely one many times more twisted than MS could ever be.

    52. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      Gary Kildall killed Gary Kildall. If it was because of the business deal he lost to Bill with IBM then we should be thankfull that such weak minded person didn't get to where bill is today as I am sure someone who kills themselves over there own mistakes and envy of others isn't someone anybody should ever want to have that sort of power. (PS: I thought he died in a bar brawl not suicide?)

    53. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by tyrione · · Score: 1
      Take John Carmack, as an example. He dropped out of college after 2 semesters. He is the person that video card manufacturers worship in the hopes he uses their architecture to pioneer the next-generation of gaming. Is he someone you'd also consider not contributing to the advance of the computer science world?

      How the hell did Carmack's name get run through the mud? The man writes and has advanced the graphics gaming engine R&D with his programming and design skills. I agree the parent poster's reference to Bill's lack of formal education reducing him to an imbecile of Computer Science is baseless at best.

    54. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by leonmergen · · Score: 2, Interesting
      IMHO, the whole progress after the first version of Windows wasn't innovation, but a logical route. "Hey, i've got a graphical user interface - let's make it prettier" and that's basically all that Microsoft has contibuted.

      Nothing against Microsoft and all, but Gates hasn't contributed as much as Kindall by far.

      --
      - Leon Mergen
      http://www.solatis.com
    55. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by TheCage · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, Stanford is named after Leland Stanford Jr., who died of typhoid. The university was meant as a rememberence to him. A better story about the elder Leland Stanford's career and naming is the student body's attempt to have the school be the "Robber barrons"

    56. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by flacco · · Score: 2, Interesting
      While I admire Bill Gates for his charitable work, I don't think he himself has contributed much to the field of computer science.

      i think you're a bit off on the charitable work part. consider the timing of the charitable work in relation to the anti-trust trial. you'll see that it coincides quite closely with the other get-our-political-act-together moves microsoft made at that time.

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    57. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by flacco · · Score: 1
      In any case, as long as you have a shiny nice new building on Bill's dime, who gives a crap what it is called?

      because it's a stupid, degrading practice to pimp yourself to some rich douchebag's megalomania?

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    58. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by TheCage · · Score: 3, Informative

      I posted this previously, but Stanford was named after Leland Stanford Jr., the son of the robber baron. Junior died of typhoid fever and the University is a rememberance to him.

    59. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by seafoodforklift · · Score: 1

      Gates has sponsored a new Computer Science building at Cambidge University, and has created a massive scholarship fund similar to the whole Rhode scholar business that Oxford's got going on. There's nothing bad with that - on the surface.

      Dig a bit deeper: Until about two years ago when I was still there, computer science students at Cambridge would get the full Visual Studio suite for free as a bonus from M$, probably other goodies too. What technologies would they then be more likely to be familiar with when they graduated???

      Like all the robber barons before him, Gates is driven by avarice. Don't be fooled by his charity, or consider it harmless. Microsoft will still be around in 40 years' time but Gates won't, and the corporation's influence and guaranteed revenue will still be radiating from the same departments and buildings he financed.

    60. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by jeif1k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If that's what he meant, maybe he should have said that instead.

      The meaning of his statement seemed clear enough to me. But, then, mathematics professors assume a certain minimal degree of intelligence on the part of their audience. As you demonstrate, that requirement isn't necessarily satisfied by everyone in their audience.

      Why, because an unknown mathematician and an anonymous coward say so?

      He was restating an idea expressed by someone else. It is up to you to make up your mind whether you agree with that idea.

      Yes, difficult as that may be to believe, even you yourself have the potential for independent thought; try exercising it for a change.

    61. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      Personally, I object to honoring Bill Gates for anything. As far as I am concerned, he is an unethical shmuck who bears principal responsibility for the suicide of Gary Kildall. Search on "Gary Kildall" if you do not know who he is.

      This is odd because I can find nothing of the sort anywhere that would link Gary's death to Gates. Wikipedia says he suffered a fall at a bar, which seems to discredit any idea of Gates being responsible...unless he pushed him of course.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    62. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by shark72 · · Score: 1

      "Dig a bit deeper: Until about two years ago when I was still there, computer science students at Cambridge would get the full Visual Studio suite for free as a bonus from M$, probably other goodies too. What technologies would they then be more likely to be familiar with when they graduated???"

      From your reaction, I can only guess that this is a rarity in the UK. In the US, companies have understood for years that getting products into the hands of students can be a good investment. Apple has been providing educational discounts since before many Slashdotters were born, and tons of software companies either provide free or low-cost copies to schools, or offer an educational discount on single purchases -- that is, take some sort of step to show that you're a student or an academic, and get a cheap price.

      As with Microsoft's adoption of this very common practice, these actions are typically not driven by philanthropy, but with the goal of making money somewhere down the road. Steve Jobs, Bill Joy, and their counterparts at Adobe, AutoDesk, and countless other companies like their money as much as Bill Gates does.

      If, this Visual Studio giveaway aside, Cambridge pays full retail for their computer hardware, software, and other resources, that's certainly a credit to Cambridge's budgeting (I suppose being around for a millennium helps). In the US, many universities are constantly struggling with budgets, and free or reduced-cost hardware and software from manufacturers can really make the difference.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    63. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      name the building "A Group of Japanese Companies" or just AGOJC
      I graduated from Lotsoslants College you insensitive clod!!!!!!
    64. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like Hitler Hall better. Or Hussein Hall. Stalin Stadium. The alliteration and all.

    65. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Moderatbastard · · Score: 1
      Why wouldn't it be appropriate to name a university building after Donald Trump?
      Because Trump is limey for fart.
      --
      1/3 of jokes get modded OT. If you get the joke, mod 1 in 3 insightful/interesting/underrated to restore karma balance.
    66. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Edie+O'Teditor · · Score: 0
      We're starting to wonder when the university will stop giving out degrees and start giving out DeGroots.
      What? All the tobocco lawsuits and they start handing out small cigars? They must be mad!
      --
      If X is the new Y, and Y is "X is the new Y", solve for X.
    67. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's funny, I always thought Gary Kildall bore principal responsibility for his own suicide. Isn't that what suicide is?


      I think reporter might be responsible for Kildall's suicide. After all, based on the search pages I looked at, he's the only one who knows it was a suicide.

      (Most sites list the cause as unknown, a fall, or a "blow to his head", which he died from 3 days later. A pretty odd way to commit suicide)

    68. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Edie+O'Teditor · · Score: 0
      Buildings at our physics department are without exception named after famous physicists who studied or worked at our department.
      That's impossible, as there would have been no building for anyone to study in before the first person got famous. Or did they study out in a field, or maybe a tent?
      --
      If X is the new Y, and Y is "X is the new Y", solve for X.
    69. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by barthrh2 · · Score: 1

      Are you implying that Gates manipulated Kildall's life? That's nonsense.

      Kildall, if anything had the edge. He had the first meeting and a potential exclusive on providing IBM with an OS. He blew off the meeting (rumor is that he went flying), and DR demanded an unreasonable price and license for their product.

      Next, he is first to market with a PC windowing system (GEM). He fails to market it, then pulls it, not believing in the potential of GUIs. MS, on the other hand, goes full tilt on the promotion of theirs.

      How is this manipulation? Kildall may have been "tech-smart" but lacked marketing savvy and was not wise enough to recognize this shortcoming and partner with someone who complimented his skills. The two key personal computing success stories of that era (MS & Apple) were founded by partners, one technically savvy, one with market vision and knowledge to make a product succeed.

      IF Kildall did commit suicide, it is the regrets of looking back on his own stupid mistakes and seeing what could have been that triggered it. Having your failures rubbed in your face my historians certainly would not have helped that.

    70. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by vena · · Score: 2, Insightful

      i think you're a bit off on the charitable work part yourself - or at least a bit too cynical. Gates has been giving away money since he got it to a laundry list of charitable causes, including his own. that his contributions have grown since the antitrust battle began is of little consequence - the wealth from which this charity comes has grown with it. last year he and his wife gave away more than half of their entire net worth; just over 23 billion dollars went to charity. last month, he gave away the entirety of his $3 billion share of the $75 billion shareholder payout.

      i think there's a point where you have to really look past the cynical fog and think, you know, he probably could have stopped at a couple billion if he just wanted the brownie points.

    71. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Edie+O'Teditor · · Score: 0
      I like Hitler Hall better.
      Isn't there a song about that, to the tune of "Colonel Bogey"?
      --
      If X is the new Y, and Y is "X is the new Y", solve for X.
    72. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Say what you want about Bill's ethics, appearance, attitude, etc, but I think its hardly fair to say he knows little about computer science. He got his start selling a full BASIC implementation that he wrote. Historicly it was not a bad version of basic either its regarded as reasonably efficent compared with the other offerings. IIRC he wrote an Altair boot loader on a plane headed to a sale, without any docs and it worked when he got there. Gates does know he computerscience fundamentals, if not in the academic sense in the practicle sense. Who cares if you know that its called "big O" if you recognize whats happening and can make descisions based on it. I hate Bill as much as the next one of us, but I don't think for a seccond he is not capeable in the CS field, he might not be among the best but neither are most of us and he IS a clever bussiness man to boot. I also bet the code coming out of M$ would be much better if Bill was writing it personally.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    73. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      1. How much of KDE and Gnome (now be honest) and any other "popular" window manager for X is trying to mimick the better parts of MS Windows (the only way to take the market is to emulate it, and make it work better)?

      My reaction the first time I saw Windows 95 was "oh look, they finally got a start menu like fvwm has."

      SInce Microsoft has spent the last 2 decades copying everybody else, saying that KDE/Gnome are trying to mimick Windows isn't completely fair.

    74. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm curious, what did Bill Gates code? I often see him credited with Lander and a BASIC compiler. Far from a great achievement, specially considering his monumental failures.

    75. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by fritz1968 · · Score: 1

      Many people were dismayed that Bill Gates, a college dropout with little knowledge of computer science, would receive the honor of having the computer science building named after him.

      In my opinion, if a college/university is going to name a building after Gates, the building should house not the CS department, but the Marketing or business department.

      Think about it... it is debatable on whether Windows and Office are good or bad. Oh wait, this is Slashdot... Everyone knows that Windows and Office sucks, but yet both still dominate in the business world. Why? Because of a combination of both the business and Marketing strategies of M$. If it was not for their business/marketing strategies, then we would all be complaining about how WordPerfect and OS/2 sucks.

      --
      It is not the strongest of the species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.
    76. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by flacco · · Score: 2, Funny
      i think there's a point where you have to really look past the cynical fog and think, you know, he probably could have stopped at a couple billion if he just wanted the brownie points.

      perhaps a donation to the FSF would clear the cynical fog ;-)

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    77. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Since it was Gary Kildall being stupid enough to go skiing on days when he was supposed to have meetings with IBM, it was definitely his own fault. All Bill Gates did was take advantage of his competitor's mistake - good business sense.

      he was not skiing but fucking a wife of IBM's exec, for god's sake!

    78. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      I hate Bill as much as the next one of us, but I don't think for a seccond he is not capeable in the CS field, he might not be among the best but neither are most of us and he IS a clever bussiness man to boot.

      Being able to write a simple BASIC interpreter and being "capable in the CS field" are very, very different things.

      Even sadder -- the building next door is the Newell-Simon building, which honors two of the greatest computer scientists ever -- and next door, a building to the man who made making money off of well-marketing and poorly-building software.

      I also bet the code coming out of M$ would be much better if Bill was writing it personally.

      That's absurd. You take a random executive that hasn't coded in ten years and never finished college and you'll have a similar situation.

    79. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Gates and Allen coded the original Ticketmaster ticket reservation system, IIRC. Microsoft did up some productivity apps that later became Office -- if Gates was still involved in actual development then, he can take some credit.

    80. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so.. what has he coded? has he worked on anything really important besides basic which importance can be questioned easily?

      because all the really important ms products come FROM OUTSIDE MICROSOFT, starting with(dos was bought, windows tcp/ip stack comes from bsd.. even ie's base came from outside microsoft!)

    81. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a reason he doesn't donate to the Communist Party either. Not comparing the two except insofar as both go against what he believes.

    82. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      I agree and I wish they would tear down the Sajak pavillion at the hospital in Annapolis.

      I mean, so the guy donates a few million to a hospital to build a new building for cancer treatment or whatever.

      Is he a doctor? Has Pat Sajak cured any diseases? No, Pat Sajak is just a game show host.

      It's an insult. If those cancer patients had any honor they'd freeze to death in the streets rather than getting treatment at a building named after such an obvious fraud.

      In fact, I think it should be illegal to make any kinds of donations unless you're a respected academic in your field.

      PS. Gates did more for Computer Science than you or your mathematics professor have ever done. If you don't like it, tough shit.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    83. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Analog+Anomaly · · Score: 3, Informative

      Gary Kildall... It seems you know the name but not the history. You see Gary didn't commit suicide, not as we've come to know the term. He was killed in a brawl in 1994 at a biker bar. However his contribution to the computer science society was long before Gates even knew what a Micro Computer was. Gary developed CP/M for a little company called Digital Research in 1974. Before the IBM PC hit the market, before MS-DOS, hell 9 years before a 10 meg hard drive hit the market costing just a wee bit over $3000.00 (USD) Gary was writing an operating system, supporting it, and a growing user-base. IBM offered to buy this operating system, but Gary refused, just as Radioshack had refused to buy Bill's operating system while he was working for them. Now They shell out billions to Bill, whom graciously accepted IBM's offer of $50,000 at the time.

    84. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by xtheunknown · · Score: 1

      Gary Kildall had the opportunity to license DR-DOS to IBM and he blew it! He didn't sign the non-disclosure and Gates did. He sent IBM to Gates.

      I respect Gary because he actually wrote DR-DOS, whereas Bill Gates only licensed DOS from SCC and then sold the rights to IBM. That makes Gary Kildall a technical wiz and Bill Gates a business wiz.

      Typically, buildings are named after their principal donors. If Donald Trump donated $20 million to CMU for a CS building, then they would name it after him.

      --

      They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
    85. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The parent specifically said that he wasn't saying that this was what happened. He was merely addressing the (absurd) claim that no one can be in any way responsible for the suicide of another.

    86. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If KDE and Gnome are merely copying the better parts of MS-Windows then I for one will stay away from "Lee-nux" as long as possible.

      If that is how the desktops/look-n-feel etc are being developed, then you will have forfeited the "battle" from the very beginning.

      Excuse me, but you will have to prise OS/2 from my dead, cold fingers! The Desktop (beloved of we OS/2 fanatics as the WorkPlace Shell) is the killer app of the platform.

      Stepping back a little, there is a lot of prior art involved here. MS copied Apple who copied Xerox PARC work.

      IBM in OS/2 copied Apple and Xerox PARC work. But they managed to make "object-oriented" actually *mean something* in OS terms.

      MS-Windows has never been able to do objects as OS/2 does objects. A(n) MS-link is not and never will be the same as an OS/2 shadow, f'rinstance.

      If you want to do a decent desktop, then get the SOM classes from IBM (NB: now in public domain) and build an object oriented OS for yourselves.

      I suspect that MS is constitutionally incapable of coding that kind of quality - and the marketing droids wouldn't know what it was or how to sell it.

      And to sink the final boot into the ribs, BG's character is the big problem - he's been on record, out of his own mouth, as a megalomaniac from the earliest DOS days.

      [Can't remember my login details, sorry. I'm not really anonymous...]

      John Angelico
      talldad@kepl.com.au

    87. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a teacher in public education. Bill Gates has enriched himself at the expense of public education. (Millions of) schools have sent millions (and possibly billions over the years to M$ in licensing fees, bloated service contracts, etc.). Any use of words such as "benefactor" and "charitable" are hardly appropriate with the name "Bill Gates". I have seen money that could have provided lunch for poor children go to buying copies of M$ Office...

      The man is nothing more than a modern version of a robber baron, etc.

    88. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Analog+Anomaly · · Score: 1

      If you want a more detailed explination of Gary's profound influence on the industry click the link above.

    89. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by xtheunknown · · Score: 1

      Sorry for the mistake, but Kildall wrote CP/M, not DR-DOS.

      --

      They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
    90. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      He was in fact a very talented coder in his day--I know this isn't the same as a computer scientist, but quite frankly id rather be a coder any day of the tweek. I guess the tought of a top CS building being named for the top software companies top employee doesn't really rankle me that much.

      Bill Gates has written some software that has enjoyed commercial success, and he really has worked hard to get where he is. Still, most of the people who really know something about the field would say he may well have done more harm than good, and his software, beyond not being really groundbreaking, is actually highly annoying to those who know how software should work. So it's pretty much like naming the music building after Britney Spears.

    91. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      perhaps a donation to the FSF would clear the cynical fog ;-)

      i dunno, i'm pretty sure the world is better off with him putting all of the money into social charities that deal with famine and disease than free software.

    92. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God your such a frickin idiot. You and this snobby poor lamented mathematics professor should have fronted the money for the building instead of Gates. Oh you don't have the cash? Then STFU.

    93. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by mantera · · Score: 1

      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain.

    94. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Talented coder? Surely you jest.

      Have you ever LOOKED at the spaghetti code in Gates' old BASIC ROMS?

    95. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "One mathematics professor lamented that money buys anything -- including undeserved honors. He commented that Stanford University might as well name the building after "Donald Trump" since he is a billionaire."

      Those that can do. Those that can't teach.

    96. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by glacote02 · · Score: 0

      [i]2. Gates and Microsoft, as much as people don't want to admit, drove the PC into the mainstream use for end-user consumers. Microsoft followed others such as DEC, Sun, etc., and had something that ran on hardware of the day for academic and commercial reasons, and then took a leap (albeit Apple was already there in small representation, and Xerox just didn't market their workstation as effectively as MS did), and voila! They made a new market of people who found the usefulness of a computer at home.[/i] Defintely not. IBM did, as their having standardize the hardware drove to its commoditization. Everybody agreed that Mac's were superior to PCs - they did cost more, though. Microsoft software were far behing MAC - but PC were also way cheaper. Thus IBM () did bring computing to the masses - Microsoft just profited of it by illegally maintaining and expanding their monopoly on an exploding market they had done [b]nothing[/b] to help develop.

    97. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. If it weren't for Bill Gates, you linonuts wouldn't have a desktop market to try to be konqering, you'd still have the worldwide market of 5 personal computers that the visionaries at IBM saw.

    98. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by mantera · · Score: 1


      this has a good perspective on the issue...

      http://www.maxframe.com/EUBANKS.HTM

    99. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Linux+is+shit · · Score: 1

      Cheap shots and lame jokes aside, you have to wonder about the character of a person who wants a load of buildings named after himself. Is he donating this money to be kind or to get his name mentioned a lot?

      --
      Linux will succeed on the desktop the day you don't need the CLI to install a driver.
    100. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Garse+Janacek · · Score: 1
      It's kind of ironic, though, complaining about how his money got his name applied to the building even though he (apparently) knows little about computer science, when this is all happening at Carnegie Mellon, an entire school named after Andrew Carnegie, a millionaire from the steel industry who was probably far from expert in many of the fields the school teaches and taught, and whose primary contribution to it was, as in the case of Gates, a pile of money.

      Speaking as a recent CMU graduate, I'm not thrilled about having a Gates building on campus, either. But I think it's a little hypocritical that the school can be named after a rich guy in exchange for money, but as soon as the same thing happens to a building everyone complains. Many of the buildings at the school (and at many other schools) are named after rich guys, and people are upset about it this time not because they've suddenly reevaluated whether that's a reasonable approach, but because they dislike Bill Gates.

      So sure, if you want to argue that the school shouldn't accept money from this particular billionaire, go ahead (though in that case I disagree with you, despite my personal feelings about Gates). But don't suddenly act surprised and offended that money can buy the names of buildings and schools in the academic world, because it's been that way for a long, long time. In the end, this gives a major boost in funding to a school that has by far the lowest endowment of any school with its reputation, and that's a Good Thing in my book.

      --

      I am the man with no sig!

    101. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by nanoakron · · Score: 1

      Ignoring external factors as precipitants for suicide and solely laying the blame on the suicidee is analogous to blaming only the bullet for a murder.

      -Nano.

    102. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bill Gates should have his name on a building, but it shouldn't be a comp. sci. building. It should be a building dedicated to the study of marketing.

      If someone can sell an over-priced-piece-of-junk OS like Windows... as an enterprise platform no less, he must be a marketing genius.

      If you have to give credit at least give credit where credit is due.

    103. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by desktop_dope · · Score: 1

      Like, students from American University?

      Or American students studying at any university?

      What an astonishing thing to post. Anonymously, I might add.

      Figures.

      --
      ^^^^^^^ Man, those Samoans are a surly bunch.
    104. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod this guy up. I am not a fan of BG, or MS, but he does have a very good point.

    105. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by AbbyNormal · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, there is always a way out. That is why they have counselors and suicide hotlines. You can manipulate a person as much as you want, but that person still has freedom of choice and avenues to turn to, even though at times they may not feel like it. If you, as a concerned friend or family member know of someone that is in trouble and let him take his own life without action, that is a different matter. For more information see: http://www.isu.edu/~meadstep/shotln.htm

      --
      Sig it.
    106. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by rnd() · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The parent is 100% accuate. Bill Gates has employed more of the top computer scientists than anyone else in the history of the world, and such employment is one of the main reasons that college kids want to major in computer science.

      --

      Amazing magic tricks

    107. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by ignavus · · Score: 1

      Bill Gates paid for most of the building. Donald Trump didn't.

      Um, no. The original post said:

      The majority of the funds came from a group of Japanese companies.

      Last I heard, neither Microsoft nor Bill Gates is a Japanese company. So Bill Gates was a *minority* contributor, but the building was still named after him.

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
    108. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Total_Wimp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Columbus didn't build the ships or man the sails or oars. He just acquired the funding and led the expeditions. He has an entire holiday named after him.

      Bill Gates does a similar job. By just about everyone's recconing, he points Microsoft in the direction he thinks it should go and the people under him make it happen. That's leadership. For that reason, and the fact that Windows is in use on 80%-90% + or the worlds personal computers, he absolutely deserves credit as one of the most influential information technology leaders ever.

      Put another way, if he gets blamed for Windows problems without having coded them, shouldn't he also get credit for it's successes?

      TW

    109. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by joshmccormack · · Score: 1

      ...it shouldn't be appropriate to name the building after Bill Gates simply because he provided a large chunk of the financing

      Getting millions to build a building is something people should be thankful for, not snotty about how better educated they are. If they think they're so much better than Bill Gates, and naming the building is so dear to them, they should have told him no thank you and done without.

      It's frankly stupid. That mathematician should study up on his logic a bit. What's the difference whose name is on the building? If you want to build me a house you can name it after yourself, if you like.

    110. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by renderhead · · Score: 1

      You mean Bill Gates beat him to death?

      No, no, no, no! He didn't beat him to death, he "bought him out".

      --
      I wish that my inferiority complex were as good as yours.

      -RenderHead

    111. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every UK college has a Nelson Mandela bar... :-)

    112. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by tcr · · Score: 1

      He was skiiing in his light aircraft?

      --


      Information wants to be beer.
    113. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      I worked in that building in 1997 as an NT rollout tech. We used the lecture hall at the GSB, or Graduate School of Business, in the atrium area. I lamented the building was named after gates, too.

      Worse, I lamente that we were rolling out NT boxes to professors, Deans, Staff, and Faculty, many of whom didn't want the HP boxes loaded with all that stuff. Many were contented to keep their Apples, and when that tape backup disaster struck Stanford GSP, ms had egg on its face because one of their prime, buddy-buddy-consultants who "knew everything" did not properly set up the backups, nor test them. A friend I worked with who knew of the problem also warned them to rearchitect it, for it was a problem waiting to happen. He was barred from being on the project, probably because he was a threat to the established consultant.

      I was dismayed that that same established consultant was hell-bent to rip out all vestiges of Novell, too.

      I was dismayed that windoze was showing internet exploder as THE browser, and was on the start button, but you had to DIG for Netscape. I remedied that by making sure that EVERY desktop I deployed, especially in the Library where the transient students were going to be influenced, had Netscape on the desktop, since we were told not to put NS on the start button. We weren't explicitly told by IT staff NOT to put it on the desktop so I made sure the GSB students/visitors KNEW about Netscape.

      Now, they need to know about Opera, and others that run on windoze. At work, where I now am, I rolled out some xp and 2k boxes, and of course I put Opera on them. We have some users who just keep having problems with that goddamned security hole wretch called internet explorer that it was easier to give the users Opera. Not all of them use it, but now they know it's an OPTION.

      Another story for later... How San Francisco's shiny new library forces users (whether resident or not) to surrender driver's license info, and more, just to use the desktop computer. They don't even have a stand-alone printer for visitors to print from their own laptop. It is not possible (or permitted) to wirelessly or via Cat 5 use their printer. I had my own laptop, but they wouldn't let me use a printer, and the employee told me I'd have to sign up for a card, reserve a computer (which I'd not likely get since it then was about 330 PM), and I'd have to use "microsoft word".

      I FLATLY told her, "I don't use "word". I only use OpenOffice.Org, Star Office, or Lotus Word Pro. I don't need word. I just need to right click on the file and tell windows to print it. It won't even need to run word."

      Her response was muted, cautious, but maybe with a tinge of "whatever".

      And, this, in a state rife with campaign corruption, abusive tax/fee structures on small businesses that don't even EARN or MAKE a penny, and we don't have ANY pervasiveness of F/LOSS solutions in our PUBLIC, TAX-FINANCED institutions, libraries, or government offices as a matter of policy.

      No wonder california's economy is going to go to hell in a hand basket.

      I'm propose we remedy that: Let's get a list of ALL public and commercial property, list the activities known to be their, list their estimated annual corporaition for/not-for-profit tax/fee, their property taxes, their sales and assets taxes and assessments and figure out who's LYING about our tax collection infrastructure.

      Let's blog, wiki, tiki-wiki and MySQL the HELL out of the thing, track the various departments, their bloat, their activities, their budgets, their vehicles and projects, and since it's all public policy/law/process, there DAMN WELL better not be any obfuscation as long as we don't list the run-of-the-mill employees, their addresses or personal information. But, the top dogs, the decision-makers... they get to be NAMED (less privacy info, again), and any SCREWUPS or political diversions of monies need to be shown and mirrorred.

      California (and many other states) need to learn to lay off, live within their means, and use F/LOSS and stop taking dirty/coerced/"power-graby" money. That goes for colleges, too.

      David Syes

      David Syes

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    114. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Followed your link.

      One might argue that getting involved in a biker bar brawl is, in fact, suicide... :-/

    115. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by iMaple · · Score: 1

      Search on "Gary Kildall" if you do not know who he is.
      Your link for a search points to search.yahoo.com !!!

    116. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      As far as I am concerned, he is an unethical shmuck who bears principal responsibility for the suicide of Gary Kildall.

      No, Gary Kildall bears principal responsibility for the suicide of Gary Kildall.

      I hope this doesn't degrade into a flamewar about suicide, but I think it's pretty safe to say that people who kill themselves do so because they have innate mental health problems, regardless of any triggering behavior from other people.

    117. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      Precisely why, although I thought at first "this is pretty amusing", my second thought was "nah, it's probably more a matter of sour grapes from leftist professors objecting to something being named after somone who isn't a communist".

      Thanks for validating my deep faith in the unending pettiness of academia. Or the undying devotion of academia to communism. Not sure which.

      Man gives money to college. College uses money to build building. Man gets name on building.

      It's really not terribly complicated. But hey, bitching is better than having to actually work for a living, right?

      --
      -Styopa
    118. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by ClubStew · · Score: 1

      ...and forget the fact that he contributes all year long, giving both money, software, and hardware - http://www.gatesfoundation.com/.

    119. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think Bill Gates is responsible for the suicide of Gary Kildall....

      you are a stupid fucktard.

    120. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      housing the pre-eminent computer-science department that is among the top 3 in the nation

      MIT, CMU, CalTech, Berkeley, Champaign-Urbana, WUStL, Stanford, in that order. I count #7.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    121. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      Second, the point of the mathematics professor was that it wouldn't be appropriate to name the building after Donald Trump even if he had payed for most of the building.

      If that's what he meant, maybe he should have said that instead.


      It's a shame that the second I write sarchasm, someone's going to accuse me of not knowing how to spell sarcasm.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    122. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      Uh... hate to break it to you, but most campuses name buildings after whoever fronts the cash, not after anyone "inspiring".

      Hate to be the one to let you in on the big secret, but the reason the academics are up in arms is that this is a 20-year trend which is worrying. This isn't at all true. With the exception of founders naming their schools after themselves, as your oh-so-sage example trips over, the bulk of buildings on school campuses - even donated ones! - are named for luminaries, not people with pocketbooks.

      When you struggle to find evidence, please consider that until recently, benefactors almost never gave single buildings. Consider, for example, that every single Rutgers campus and every building on both Livingston and Douglass campuses except for the dorms which have names are named for intellectuals.

      I find it particularly ironic

      Watch futurama until you know what the word ironic means, please. Oh, and when you get m-w.com to back you up, please go ask a scholar what decimate means and look that up too. When you get confused why that happened, look up translucent, aenima and etiquette. Now finally beginning to grasp that dictionaries gloss over significant usage even when etymological, start your actual education with Ambrose Bierce's "A Little Blacklist of Literary Faults," freely available at Project Gutenberg.

      Oh, and while you're pretending to know things, the person you're talking about is not the Stanford for whom the school was named, but rather his father, who built the school in recognition of his son who, while voicing strong opinions on the then-abominable state of American higher education, had died of Typhoid. The son was, in fact, quite the academic, though he died too early to make much personal contribution.

      Nice try, though; you got some moderators to fall for your plot. Mod parent down, please; +4 insightful isn't exactly fair to Leland's (false) memory.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    123. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      No, it isn't. It's named for his son, who had died of typhoid. Please stop parrotting the average slashdot idiot in order to gain karma; the average slashdot idiot generally doesn't know a damned thing.

      Also, you might want to stop using phrases like "robber barron," also ripped directly from another post; he was an industrial magnate. Robber barrons are people whose vast fortunes were made from other people's vast fortunes, like Mellon and Falk, not actual industrialists like Carnegie. (Jesus, could I look any more like I'm from Pittsburgh?) The Stanford you're referring to, which isn't Leland, the one the school is named for, is not a robber barron, but an industrialist.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    124. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      Whereas that's true, and whereas Gates was more a manager for Ticketmaster than anything, there are earlier examples of his personal code such as the old BASIC ROMs which are actually marvellously tight.

      He can be shown to at one point have been a hell of a cowboy coder. Grit your teeth all you want; it's actually true.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    125. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      1. The desktop model of computering is old, really old. There are demos from the late 60's, early 70s. MS lifted its windowing ideas the same place Apple did, from Xerox. Seems everything is initially derived from Xerox.

      'Course, PARC had really just implemented something Vannevar Bush had thought up in his head fifteen years earlier. The web, hypercard, windowed interfaces and the 'net come from Vannevar. He was teh smartassed.

      2. The home computer didn't hit critical mass until Netscape and the web gave people a real excuse to buy a home computer or two.

      This really just depends on your definition of critical mass. I would have put the mark at the first end-user spreadsheet, which made the Apple ][ the suddenly-dominant (first dominance in home computing) home computer.

      And your kids are going to insist that critical mass came from the ... oh wait, the web's your kids' example. Er. Your grandkids are gonna talk about the iPod.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    126. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      Personally, I object to honoring Bill Gates for anything. As far as I am concerned, he is an unethical shmuck who bears principal responsibility for the suicide of Gary Kildall. Search on "Gary Kildall" if you do not know who he is.

      Sigh. He was killed in a barfight, not a suicide, and frankly a suicide over a signle (if huge) missed business opportunity wouldn't make Gates the badguy anyway.

      Research before slander, asshat. Are you sure you should be telling other people to search?

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    127. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Toresica · · Score: 1

      What, Michael Hall, the DeGroot Research Institute and the hot new recreational area, the G Spot?

      Odd, you must go to a different school then I do.
      Which means he has two schools full of minons? *puts on the tinfoil hat*

    128. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like it or lump it, but Windows and Office are by their very nature contributions to the field of computer science. What is and isn't "science" is not to be determined by you, but the fact is that he's out there creating wondrous things while you're sitting on your ass in your parents' basement whinging slashdot. That gives him umpteen times more credibility in my book.

    129. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by njl · · Score: 1

      You're the only reference I can find on the "suicide" of Gary Kildall. References on the Net say he died of a fall (accident? fight?) he took at a bar in Monterey.

      So why cast that allegation?

    130. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by rtb61 · · Score: 1
      Hate to be cruel to Bill. But history is still going to be somewhat unkind to him anyhow. He is Goliath in the David and Goliath battle i.e. Bill "Master of the Beast" vs Linus "Penguinista" Torvalds, and with operating systems being the core of the interface between computers and humans, having Linux sitting in front of peoples faces for the next, say twenty to thirty years (hell maybe even the next hundred years) is really going to reinforce it.

      What a suck way to be remembered in a thousand years from now and knowing it is going to happen (I am sure he is bright enough to realise it). I would be tempted to try and buy my way out of it as well. And yet all he has to do is get out of Microsoft and "Join Us".

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    131. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Inspector+Lopez · · Score: 1
      Your mathematics professor should take a refresher course in logic. Bill Gates paid for most of the building. Donald Trump didn't. See the difference?

      Although Bill Gates paid for more of Stanford's building than did Donald Trump, Gates did not pay for most of it. In fact, Gates wangled quite a deal --- for merely $7M out of about $60M he got his name on the bricks. Nice Trick! At least CMU is getting $20M, ...

      I'm campaigning to get some bricks named "Chestnut & Gibson" a couple of people who died while doing their jobs in DC. People like these never get things named for them. If Gates has the CMU building named for Chestnut & Gibson, then I'll be impressed.
    132. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by mdfst13 · · Score: 1

      And the article is about CMU: named after a steel magnate (Andrew Carnegie) and a rich judge (Thomas Mellon).

    133. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bill Gates has employed more of the top computer scientists than anyone else in the history of the world,

      I think that's factually false; IBM and AT&T probably still have Microsoft beat, both in terms of total numbers employed over their history, total output, and significance to the field.

      But even assuming it were true: why do you think so many computer science researchers went to Microsoft? Because they wanted to work under a college dropout who made billions selling MS-DOS and Basic? I don't think so.

      Microsoft is directly or indirectly responsible for destroying most of the top computer science research labs around the world. Those computer scientists that work at Microsoft often just didn't have any other choice anymore after their former places of employment fell apart.

    134. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by rnd() · · Score: 1

      Your point doesn't make sense. Microsoft hired the best and brightest from AT&T, IBM, etc., and used their talent to build the most successful business in the history of the world.

      Computer scientists who decided to go to work at Microsoft decided to do so for any number of reasons, some of which may have been pay, working for a college dropout, loving BASIC, free juice and soda in the cafeteria, etc. Who are you to tell anyone why they should or shouldn't want to work somewhere?

      Microsoft is working on some of the most exciting stuff in computer science today. Check out research.microsoft.com for an index of some of the projects.

      --

      Amazing magic tricks

  27. Donation??? by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 3, Insightful
    C'mon for a multi-billionare (fsck the spelling) paying someone $20M to carve your name on a building in a world famous campus is a cheap ego boost.

    If it was a real donation it would be more discretely done (eg. name it after a famous person other than Gates and perhaps put up a small plaque saying it was funded by Gate foundation).

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Donation??? by TheUnFounded · · Score: 1

      Lessee....he currently has about $30 billion, so that would be roughly 6.5% of his total wealth at the moment. Mind you, I could probably spare 6.5% of my net worth if the remaining $$ left me well over the $29 billion mark...

    2. Re:Donation??? by HalfFlat · · Score: 1

      Hmm, 20 million divided by 30 billion is about 0.00067. That's 0.067%.

      It's within an order of magnitude of pocket change, relatively speaking.

    3. Re:Donation??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $20 million out of $30 billion is nowhere near 6.5%. In fact one billion out of thirty billion is only roughly half of that 6.5%.

      $20mill/$30 bill is about 0.067%

    4. Re:Donation??? by Obiwan+Kenobi · · Score: 1

      If it was a real donation it would be more discretely done (eg. name it after a famous person other than Gates and perhaps put up a small plaque saying it was funded by Gate foundation).

      As recorded after the press conference, when Bill wasn't sure his mic was still on:

      "Please don't cash that cardboard check. This isn't a real donation. But slashdot will flame the piss out of me for it."

      Say what you like (I don't like how he funnels his cash into the fundation to take it out tax-free, but that's me), but for $20 mill the guy can put his damn name on the building.

      However, instead of this strawman argument, the fact he wants it to be a $50 million dollar building instead of a $20 mill one and still get it named after him is what seems stupid/goofy/out of touch to me.

  28. what KIND of bright blue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hopefully not sky blue, unless they want a helicopter to crash into it.

    Curse those Stonecutters......

  29. It would be better spent on law school by trud · · Score: 2, Informative

    Money donated to computer science will be better spent in endowing fellowships in patent law.

    Microsoft continues to make the world a better place for lawyers and is likely eventually to hold on retainer 51% of attorneys worldwide.

  30. $20M but... by zorander · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He wants the campus to build a $50M building with it. Sound like a math problem? yeah. His money is appreciated, but he's asking the campus to build more than he's willing to support, which is mildly questionable.

    Even better, though, the proposed location for the new building is on top of this really shitty excuse for a building that looks like a few mobile homes shoved up against eachother and is generally an eyesore. In the artist's rendering of the plans, it apppears to be styled like many of the more nice looking new and old campus buildings (Green roof, light colored brick, etc) which is definitely a good thing. CMU has some pretty buildings, but it also has some impressive eyesores. Good to see one of them go away.

    Also consider that Microsoft is the #1 employer of CS grads from CMU. This school's students and expertise have served him well, so I'm glad to see that he's willing to give something back.

    1. Re:$20M but... by crimson30 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Also consider that Microsoft is the #1 employer of CS grads from CMU. This school's students and expertise have served him well

      So maybe his half-ass donation is what he thought they deserve for the half-ass OS they've cranked out.

    2. Re:$20M but... by roach2002 · · Score: 1

      Actually, they wanted to build an academic building there already. Check out the Master Plan.

      It's the tan outline (for new) on page 19 of the pdf (labeled 15), south of the main road (Forbes Ave) right in the center.

      So his gift is, in fact, helpful.

    3. Re:$20M but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Also consider that Microsoft is the #1 employer of CS grads from CMU. This school's students and expertise have served him well, so I'm glad to see that he's willing to give something back."

      That is true, but Microsoft has other schools that provide it with more CS grads. UIUC is the University from where Microsoft hires more CS grads.

  31. Exterminators... by Ieshan · · Score: 1

    Also, faculty have suggested opening large boxes of roaches and mosquitos, and never, ever, ever calling the Exterminator.

    For realism's sake.

    1. Re:Exterminators... by Justin205 · · Score: 1

      No...

      They'd just call the exterminators about once a month to kill off one mosquito. Once every three months to kill a roach.

      Remember, only one at a time.

      --
      "Your effort to remain what you are is what limits you."
  32. an antidote to other posts here by circletimessquare · · Score: 1, Interesting

    "thank you, bill gates, for donating money to an a academic instution"

    the preceding is an antidote to the typical lowest common denominator slashdot bs

    you may now go back to your usual tired stale jokes and rants

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:an antidote to other posts here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      academic institutions often suck.
      cmu especially.

    2. Re:an antidote to other posts here by hereschenes · · Score: 1

      Of course, we can tell what side _you_ are coming from, because your sig clearly indicates that you still run DOS.

      --
      More like... nerdular nerdence!
    3. Re:an antidote to other posts here by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      I remember that the MS-DOS editor as we know it came in around version 5, but when did it get the tracert command and the prerequisite TCP/IP support?

      (C'mon, it's an NT command prompt)

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
  33. heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An artist's conception of the new building shows three entrances with one facing Forbes Avenue, the major Pittsburgh thoroughfare on which the campus is located.

    As per a requirement from the donors, one entrance will always be kept unlocked and unguarded. If anyone steals anything at night, the door will be locked, and another chosen to remain unlocked. The full cost of any burglary or damage will remain with CMU. "This will allow us to bring the Windows experience to the physical world" said Mr Gates.

  34. Originally... by xeon4life · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I was looking into going to CMU for their esteemed Computer Science program, but now I just hope they wont let this influence their set of courses, breadth of experience, or heterogeneous computer labs...

    --
    Real programmers can write assembly code in any language. -- Larry Wall
    1. Re:Originally... by linefeed0 · · Score: 1

      Don't worry... you can work on Unix your whole time at CMU and still make fun of Linux with the best of them when you get your job at Microsoft along with all the other alums that work there. Supposedly CMU has a higher rate of Microsoft employment per graduated CS student than any other school in the US.

    2. Re:Originally... by omicronish · · Score: 1

      I was looking into going to CMU for their esteemed Computer Science program, but now I just hope they wont let this influence their set of courses, breadth of experience, or heterogeneous computer labs...

      The University of Washington's Computer Science department recently moved into a new building partially funded by donations from Paul Allen, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and Microsoft. Maybe they try to influence the software used to teach courses at other schools, but I don't see that here at all. The introductory programming courses are taught in Java (originally C++), the OS course requires that you write code on a *nix box (one of the projects involves modifying the Linux kernel), and most classes allow for projects to be coded on either a Unix or Windows machine. The computer labs actually increased percentage-wise in the number of Linux machines after moving into the new building.

      This university is about a 15 minute drive from Microsoft in good traffic, and the evening CS master's program has a lot of Microsoft employees as students, so you'd expect a huge influence on course software. But Unix pops up in enough places that it feels balanced to me.

    3. Re:Originally... by killjoe · · Score: 1

      It will probably take a few years to get rid of all the unix machines. If you are entering now you should be OK.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    4. Re:Originally... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1
      He's given comparable amounts of money to Harvard (the infamous Max Dork, err... Maxwell Dworkin CS building) and now to MIT as well I believe (the new LCS building I think, haven't actually been in it yet). There was a bit of a fracas at Harvard over whether the dumb terminals that had been donated by Gates and Ballmer and then prompty wiped of the weird Windows terminal software and replaced with Linux should be taken down when Ballmer was there for the official ceremony honoring him and the building (they were, I believe, but promptly reappeared within a few days afterwards).


      As far as I know, none of this has meaningfully affected the curriculum at either school, and I'm assuming UNIX is still as integral a part of the CS department at Harvard and MIT as it always was (there was no evidence when I was still in school that things were changing at all). I wouldn't be surprised if Microsoft tried to get mileage out of it, but my guess is the best it does is give Gates good PR with the current crop of CS students and thus serves as a very effective recruiting exercise.

    5. Re:Originally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Judging by how much Unix systems are used around here and the general sentiment of the professors, I very strongly doubt that this will have an effect on what systems are used in courses. A building does not imply such a large change in the curriculum - or indeed any at all. There would be an uproar if Windows were to entirely replace Unix and Mac systems here.

  35. In related news... by Joey+Patterson · · Score: 2, Funny

    Carnegie-Mellon University officials today reported that several designs for metal keys to the new Gates Center for Computer Science, which hasn't even been built yet, were found on the Kazaa and Gnutella filesharing networks. CMU Campus Police and Microsoft are reportedly investigating the leaked keys.

  36. IBM by LuxFX · · Score: 3, Informative

    I admit, I didn't get the Blue Screen of Death reference at first. I've been using Windows 2000 since it came out, and I might have seen a BSOD once... maybe twice. It just doesn't come up anymore.

    Actually I was mostly confused at the joke at first, thinking, "Wait a minute, I thought IBM was 'Big Blue'"

    --
    Punctanym: alternate spelling of words using punctuation or numerals in place of some or all of its letters; see 'leet'
    1. Re:IBM by DaHat · · Score: 1

      Shhh, don't say that too loud. Let the Linux zealots think that theirs is a superior operating system that never crashes.

      I'm still running 2k and the only time I ever BSOD is because of hardware issues, such as those I've been experiencing lately. (even with tested clean installs of different OSs(including linux), the system still goes down).

    2. Re:IBM by killjoe · · Score: 1

      Yes. My w2k machine doesn't blue screen. It just shuts down the machine instead. Much better.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    3. Re:IBM by pfriedma · · Score: 3, Funny

      You must have never used Windows ME.

      --
      Mak'tal shree lok'tak mek'ta sa'tak Oz! - Daniel Jackson
  37. MOD PARENT DOWN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    What Slashdot thinks about Microsoft is the *ONLY* thing that matters. The TRUTH is IRRELEVANT you DIRTBAG.

    If we had a beowulf cluster of Linux donations, we could overpower Bill Gates soooo easily!

  38. so sad for bill... by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 4, Funny

    he gives all this money to a school, but still gets the borg icon treatment on /.

    CB#

    1. Re:so sad for bill... by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      If you're using borg methods to raise the money, it doesn't help if you spend it on a good cause.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  39. hi-jacking Big Blue's potential monopoly by xtermin8 · · Score: 1

    I know there's and unfunny joke in this about BSOD, but it made me remember that IBM was/(is?) called Big Blue. Bill gates sold IBM MS-DOS (vaporware at the time) and then startegically doomed IBM's OS2 through a duplicitous partnership. Whatever color it is, the building should definately have a pirate's flag. "Developers, developers, developers..."

  40. B.B.O.D. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Four words:

    == Blue Building Of Death ==

  41. Those who cheer don't see the order of magnitude by icecow · · Score: 1

    If microsoft only make 10,000 times what I make a year for them to spend $10,000 would hurt no more than if I spend a $1. $20 million for a building with Bill Gates name plastered on it is no better then if I went and paid $200 to put a tatoo reading "by the grace of icecow" on a highschool homecommming queen's forhead.

    It's just not appropriate, I'm told.

    --
    Stop invalid scientific research. Ask your local scientists to feed their lab rats with a phytoestrogen-free chow.
  42. Remember when Stallman's office went Gates? by Phat_Tony · · Score: 1

    Anyone remember the furor when it looked like Richard Stallman's office and the Free Software Foundation would be in the new Gates building at MIT?

    --
    Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
  43. In that case.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the White House should be painted blue as well.

  44. Blue by shogun · · Score: 1

    Sooo IBM isn't the Big Blue anymore?

  45. Another windows joke.. by Propagandhi · · Score: 1

    Painting it blue makes sense, but shouldn't it be full of (security) holes as well? I'm envisioning unlocked lab after unlocked lab, no doors, open windows.

    In practice with MS's security mold they would keep the blue prints under lock and key, as to keep anyone from being able to exploit these flaws, of course.

    Mod me down if you want, but I'll be the one laughing when this actually happens.

  46. HA, Found it! by akeyes · · Score: 1

    Finally found the money Micro$oft stole from me!

  47. word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    true dat.

  48. "Interesting"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'll give you a Score:1, Interesting when you post your own 1040 return, with all charitable contributions itemized, to this thread.

    Until then, STFU.

    1. Re:"Interesting"? by killjoe · · Score: 1

      I bet you he spends a greater percentage of his money on charity then Bill Gates does. Most people do. Bill Gates giving away 20 million dollars is like me giving a street musician a buck.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    2. Re:"Interesting"? by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 1

      Someone else in the thread did the math. The Bill Gates Foundation has given $1.2B so far, which is around 5% of his income. So, assuming you make $50K/year, have you given $2500 to charity? Doubt it. Between my church and the humane society I give close to $1000 a year, and that's far more than most of the people I know.

      --
      You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
  49. This is pretty cool by debian4life · · Score: 1

    I mean in all seriousness that this is great. Say what you want about Bill and M$'s business, practices, but when it comes to charity, Bill puts his money where his mouth is.

    My question is this? With the raging debate that goes on about Linux on the desktop, do you think the PC's in this building will be running Gnome or KDE as the default.

    I am assuming they will be running Fedora, but I guess Suse is a possibility. But then maybe Bill won't allow them to run Suse since they are run by Novell, who is trying to rip off .net with Mono. They may try Debian, but they might be waiting on Sarge to be released before making a commitment.

    1. Re:This is pretty cool by emorphien · · Score: 1

      Very true, he gives quite a bit. You could say he should give more because he has so much more $$... but hes still pretty damn generous.

      --


      Presently here, but not there.
  50. insert potshot here by buzzini · · Score: 1

    there's only one reason slashdot posts stories like that: to give people an excuse to take cheap potshots at gates and microsoft. bonus points to samzenpus for priming the pump with the bright blue paint comment.

    seriously, isn't it time that everyone moved beyond the one-dimensional caricature of gates?

    1. Re:insert potshot here by crimson30 · · Score: 1

      seriously, isn't it time that everyone moved beyond the one-dimensional caricature of gates?

      No.

  51. Re:Beatch Please! (how about Billions) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    How about the $6Billion (not an exageration) he gave to help fight diseases in developing countries. I wouldbe willing to bet the kids dying of malaria and AIDs in Africa would find the living situation in Cleaveland quite nice.

  52. Re:windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I post on Slashdot regularly and I'm pro-Microsoft.

    I'm also a pro-Bush Republican.

    We are out there, we'd just rather not open our mouths about it if all you're going to do is flame childishly.

  53. Re:Alice and Wonderland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing like English Lit geek humor in a computer geek article. Curiouser and curiouser!

  54. Naysayers Unite! by Nathdot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It appears Bill has truly acted altruistically here.

    This does not fit our general characterizations of the man.

    How can we reconcile this seeming incongruity? By adopting the following reasoning: "$20 million for a building?! People on this planet are still starving to death! The ego!"

    1. Re:Naysayers Unite! by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      Public donations are a tried-and-true method for businesses to improve public opinion. Not to mention the influence this will have on the college students. A shrewd business move to be sure, and Bill has ever been a master of business sense. Don't forget, the donation was probably tax-deductible too. With that kind of crazy wealth, a person would pretty much have to give generous donations each year or pay even more in tax..

    2. Re:Naysayers Unite! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From Lebowski:

      "It's the foundation's money, not his!"

    3. Re:Naysayers Unite! by Dirtside · · Score: 1
      It appears Bill has truly acted altruistically here.
      A truly altruistic donation, in my view, would have been anonymous and would have been with no strings attached -- "Here's $20 million. Do whatever you want with it. - Anonymous" With his name still attached to it, and with it going to build a building that will be named after him, he reaps the publicity benefits. Altruism means that you get nothing out of the deal; you only give. (Well, nothing measurable; maybe you feel real good about it.)

      How can we reconcile this seeming incongruity? By adopting the following reasoning: "$20 million for a building?! People on this planet are still starving to death! The ego!"
      Yes, because everyone on Slashdot has the same simplistic attitude toward Bill Gates.
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  55. What CMU had to do to get this by linefeed0 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    CMU has put out a never-ending stream of disgusting propaganda since last February when Gates gave a "lecture" at CMU. If you don't care to RTFM, CMU's "alumni magazine" (even more of a blatant PR mill than at most schools) spends an entire article bragging about how wonderful it is for CMU to have tons of incestuous connections with Microsoft. (The message: come to CMU and work for Microsoft!)

    CMU may have quite a few good individual professors and research projects in CS, but the institution as a whole doesn't think twice about being a corporate-flak career school... from their advertising slogan "The Professional Choice" in the early '80s on (when CMU accepted a certain large donation from IBM and almost decided to make all its students buy PC's in 1982).

    Thankfully, many CMU students are still practicing some degree of creative resistance, although a penguin statue allegedly placed on the roof of the student center overnight before the Gates speech was hurriedly removed since apparently CMU values its clean public image more than its students' creativity.

    One other thing to note is that this is likely not much more than a matching grant for further increases in students' tuition, which pays for a much higher share of an education at CMU than at many peer schools.

    1. Re:What CMU had to do to get this by loraksus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not sure what is the big deal about taking down the penguin.

      It wasn't an act to destroy the creativity of students or supress their free speech rights, it was the janitors taking down something that was put up in an act of intellectual masturbation by a bunch of college students who apparantly had too much time on their hands.

      If someone donated $20 million to your school, you'd probably go a bit out of your way to make sure they feel welcome. That includes taking down ads for / mascots of their competitors.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    2. Re:What CMU had to do to get this by SansTinfoilHat · · Score: 1

      Thankfully, many CMU students are still practicing some degree of creative resistance, although a penguin statue allegedly placed on the roof of the student center overnight before the Gates speech was hurriedly removed since apparently CMU values its clean public image more than its students' creativity.

      I can tell you go (or went) to CMU by your bitterness and venom.

      But please correct me if I am wrong, did not representatives of a student organization personally give Gates a burn of a Linux distro when he came? Surely if the University was that paranoid about projecting a good image to Gates, they would have never let them come close or at least given them some sort of punishment?

      No one is forcing you to go to Microsoft here post-graduation. And I haven't run into a CS class yet where you HAD to use Windows. Propaganda is in the eye of the beholder.

    3. Re:What CMU had to do to get this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CMU to have tons of incestuous connections with Microsoft. (The message: come to CMU and work for Microsoft!)

      Yeah, I guess some of us are sellouts and aren't happy living in our moms basement while fighting the evil corporate machine. Have a Dorito linux fatty.

    4. Re:What CMU had to do to get this by math+major · · Score: 1

      Yes, Ed Ryan, of KGB, gave him a Knoppix CD while other members of the organization held a Linux convention downstairs. How would they keep him away? They needed an audience and had no way of knowing which potential audience members would try something like that.

      And I have had a CS class at CMU which forced me to use windows.

  56. If they paint it blue... by here4fun · · Score: 1

    Will they name it the "Blue Screen of Death". LOL. Plus, it will be too tempting for the artist in training to use some spray paint. Maybe someone will paint a penguin. LOL.

  57. what does bill gates have to do with nazis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in any event, i agree with the statement you made.

  58. It should be sky blue... by wrinkledshirt · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...that way, maybe it won't be the only thing Bill's given us that makes things crash.

    --

    --------
    Bleah! Heh heh heh... BLEAH BLEAH!!! Ha ha ha ha...

  59. Alumni magazine link by linefeed0 · · Score: 1

    The disgusting propaganda link was missing from my post, sorry.

  60. Never enough money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently Gate's $20 million is just a part of the $1 billion the University aspires to attain (see student newspaper article Carnegie Mellon receives $20 million to construct Computer Science building). $55 million buys you the right to rename a school -- late last fall an alum renamed the business school (The David A. Tepper School of Business debuts).

  61. Grafitti? by Dak+RIT · · Score: 1
    I can already see the graffiti on a giant blue building with Gate's name on it:

    BSOD

    who knew graffiti could be geeky?

  62. Give the man a break by McBeer · · Score: 5, Informative
    I notice that Gates is getting flamed despite his many charities. As much as many of you disagree with Microsofts operating policy, Bill Gates alone has given:

    $1 billion over 20 years to establish the Gates Millennium Scholarship Program, which will support promising minority students through college and some kinds of graduate school.

    $750 million over five years to the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization, which includes the World Health Organization, the Rockefeller Foundation, Unicef, pharmaceutical companies and the World Bank.

    $350 million over three years to teachers, administrators, school districts and schools to improve America's K-12 education, starting in Washington State.

    $200 million to the Gates Library Program, which is wiring public libraries in America's poorest communities in an effort to close the "digital divide."

    $100 million to the Gates Children's Vaccine Program, which will accelerate delivery of lifesaving vaccines to children in the poorest countries of the world.

    $50 million to the Maternal Mortality Reduction Program, run by the Columbia University School of Public Health.

    $50 million to the Malaria Vaccine Initiative, to conduct research on promising candidates for a malaria vaccine.

    $50 million to an international group called the Alliance for the Prevention of Cervical Cancer.

    $50 million to a fund for global polio eradication, led by the World Health Organization, Unicef, Rotary International and the U.N. Foundation.

    $40 million to the International Vaccine Institute, a research program based in Seoul, South Korea.

    $28 million to Unicef for the elimination of maternal and neonatal tetanus.

    $25 million to the Sequella Global Tuberculosis Foundation.

    $25 million to the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative, which is creating coalitions of research scientists, pharmaceutical companies and governments in developing countries to look for a safe, effective, widely accessible vaccine against AIDS.
    Source: New York Times
    And all this was of the year 2000. Now I have not checked this, but I suspect the charitable donations from every Linux distro CEO combined would fall well short of this. Admit it, Bill Gates is in fact doing some good in this world.

    --
    Hikery.net - The best hiking site ever. Made by yours truly.
    1. Re:Give the man a break by TeknoHog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Giving away money doesn't make you better if it comes from illegal or otherwise immoral activities.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    2. Re:Give the man a break by buchalka · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It does if your a kid dying of malaria in a third world country you moron (yes bill spends millions helping kids like this).

      I suppose if you were sure a kid you would say "no can't accept your life saving gift, let me die".

      Yeah right, sure you would.

      Not that I agree with what your saying about it being illegal anyway.

      Essentially sir, you are full of it.

      --
      Games Programmer And Designer
    3. Re:Give the man a break by Rascasse · · Score: 1

      This sort of reminds me of how the old New York Mafia types used to buy off their neighbors. To listen to the neighbors you'd have thought they were saints. Outside the neighborhood you'd get completely different stories on them though.

    4. Re:Give the man a break by Mskpath3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Unbelievable. People like you really live in a world of fantasy. 'illegal and immoral'? Do you really have this image of Bill Gates with a monocle, a tophat, and a cigar maniacally laughing and amusing himself with the cries of the poor? It's bizarre, detached-from-reality viewpoints such as yours that will keep honest, rational reform from ever happening.

    5. Re:Give the man a break by the-build-chicken · · Score: 1

      What else is he meant to do with it?

      "The man who dies rich dies disgraced" -- Andrew Carnegie

    6. Re:Give the man a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Funny you mention "digital divide" when Gates himself does not believe in it.

    7. Re:Give the man a break by killjoe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So he is giving a tiny percentage of the money he made using the most slimy and despicable methods known to mankind. I'm not impressed and I suspect his maker will not be either.

      If a drug dealer game money to local schools would he be a saint? While we are at it Osama Bin Laden built lots of orphanages and schools too.

      "Now I have not checked this, but I suspect the charitable donations from every Linux distro CEO combined would fall well short of this."

      In terms of absolute dollars yes, in terms of percentages I bet they gave more.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    8. Re:Give the man a break by killjoe · · Score: 1

      Osama Bin Laden gave away lots of money to build schools, orphanages, wells and things to help the destitute of afghanistan. Does that make him a good man?

      --
      evil is as evil does
    9. Re:Give the man a break by Bull999999 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not a Gates fan but him donating money, even for PR reasons, helps more than a bunch of geeks who bitches that more needs to be done for the poor, yet blows all their discretionary on toys.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    10. Re:Give the man a break by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      So he is giving a tiny percentage of the money he made using the most slimy and despicable methods known to mankind. I'm not impressed and I suspect his maker will not be either.

      Wow, you must live in a world without any context and in which microsoft is the greatest thing that keeps you up at night? god, I wish I lived in your world. Until then I'll continue to live in a world of genocides, murder and terrorism. But have fun in your "I'm 12 and I hate microsoft from my parents basement!" worldview...it won't last as you get older.

      In terms of absolute dollars yes, in terms of percentages I bet they gave more.

      Highly unlikely.

    11. Re:Give the man a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Quite impressive numbers you have here...

      But do these numbers represent hard cold cash, (and NOT 1B of Microsoft software)? And, if it is cash, then is spending tied by any chance to purchase of industry standard software made by a certain company in Redmond?

      This is not unheard of: e.g
      http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/1996 /Nov9 6/ladonpr.asp
      (1.1M donation to be spent on PCs and software)

    12. Re:Give the man a break by Fringex · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bill Gates has given a load of cash away in one year. That is alot of money. More importantly he gave it to organizations that save peoples lives not to plant foundations or animal rights groups. The money he has given has saved probably thousands of lives. Regardless of how you feel about his business tactics, his history is far more saintly than any drug dealer is mentioned in replies. You cannot compare how he runs a business to an individual who deliberately gives people chemicals that literally destroy both mind and body. I am not saying I am thrilled about how he has run Microsoft from beginning to present, but what he has done is far less evil than the compared scum of the earth. Think how you want, but it is a twisted reality. I commend the man for what he has given, because he didn't have too. No one twisted his arm. Taxes are a flash in the pan compared to his billions. For once can't someone who is anti-microsoft just clap you hands for some good they do.

    13. Re:Give the man a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Osama Bin Laden gave away lots of money to build schools, orphanages, wells and things to help the destitute of afghanistan. Does that make him a good man?

      Not sure who this Osama Bin Laden guy is but reading the above I'd say it's pretty obvious: Yes.

    14. Re:Give the man a break by Truekaiser · · Score: 1

      if i am not mistaken bill gates has also givin alot less compared to others with his wealth.

    15. Re:Give the man a break by killjoe · · Score: 1

      Saying that you smell better then shit isn't saying much. Similarly saying that what Bill Gates does is better then genocide, murder and terrorism isn't saying much.

      Whoo Hoo, Bill Gates is better then a terrorist. If that's all you can say about the guy that's saying a lot.

      "Highly unlikely."

      Most people who are givers tend to give around 5% of their income. Bill Gives way less then 1% I bet it's less then .01%.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    16. Re:Give the man a break by Mskpath3 · · Score: 1

      Bravo. Extremely well said. Wish I had a new batch of mod points to spend on you, my friend :)

    17. Re:Give the man a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bill Gates's "load of cash" given away is less than the year's interest on his net worth.

    18. Re:Give the man a break by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      Aye, you misunderstand me. I don't have a problem with Bill Gates--actually I admire him. I was merely pointing out how puerile and emotionally immature your post was.

      As another slashdotter posted, as of 2000, in grants of 20 million and greater, Bill Gates has given over 2 billion dollars. You think that's less than .01% of his "income" ? Tough crowd!

    19. Re:Give the man a break by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

      Bin Laden did those acts because...

      Bin Laden could then direct the money to support local institutions in many countries, in an attempt to radicalize those communities and give him a base to recruit and train.

      Above statement is from the CNN article on 9/11 commission. As far as I know, Gates didn't mandate that the school only teach MS stuff as the requirement for donation. Do you have a proof to back up your statements other then the usual "tin foil hat" response? And any professors who teaches MS just because of the donation are sellouts, and any student who becomes MS fan just because a building was named after Gates is a moron.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    20. Re:Give the man a break by BushMuncher · · Score: 1
      Yo dork...

      Maybe you missed the fact that this was a response to the quote:
      "money he made using the most slimy and despicable methods known to mankind"


      Are you so stupid you think a monopoly on one type of software is the "most slimy and despicable" method of making money known to mankind?

      Wake the fuck up dumbass. There are a lot bigger evils in this world.
    21. Re:Give the man a break by DeAgua · · Score: 1

      Thanks for that note Melinda. I'm glad someone's keeping track of their send-me-to-heaven credits.

    22. Re:Give the man a break by scot4875 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Many of these have been dealt with sufficiently already, but I'll respond to them on a point-by-point basis:

      Gates Millennium Scholarship Program

      To train more potential Microsoft employees! Obviously!

      Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization

      Only an attempt to keep people alive so that they can buy more Microsoft software!

      teachers, administrators, school districts and schools

      To obligate them to push a Microsoft curriculum and keep Apple and Linux out of the classroom!

      Gates Library Program

      Do they have any non-Microsoft Press books at these libraries? Probably not!

      Children's Vaccine Program, Maternal Mortality Reduction Program, Malaria Vaccine Initiative, Alliance for the Prevention of Cervical Cancer, global polio eradication, International Vaccine Institute, elimination of maternal and neonatal tetanus, Sequella Global Tuberculosis Foundation, International AIDS Vaccine Initiative

      Again, keep the potential customers alive! This is one of the cornerstones of capitalism -- ever expanding markets!

      The guy is obviously evil. That you can't see the motives behind these dubious donations just goes to show how easy it is to buy people's favor!

      Bill Gate$ is teh eviL!!1!!!1! OMGOMG!!

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    23. Re:Give the man a break by Dirtside · · Score: 1
      While we are at it Osama Bin Laden built lots of orphanages and schools too.
      Ashcroft's Corollary to Godwin's Law: As any Internet discussion proceeds, the probability of someone being compared to a terrorist approaches 1. :)
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    24. Re:Give the man a break by Eberlin · · Score: 1

      Chiming in from a library whose computer lab++ was funded by a B&MG Foundation grant.

      The machines run NT, they have a few edutainment titles. They run Office 2000. They gave material for "computer training" which were handouts on how to use Windows and Office. Had typos and instructional errors in them that nobody has bothered to find errata for. They apparently mandated that we not charge for the classes.

      Guess what -- grant fund is now out. No more financial support from the foundation. All that time, we taught people how to use Windows with Microsoft's directives. We taught MS Office and with such familiarity, do you think the lower half of the "digital divide" would get Linux and OO.org when they purchase a computer? They think that's all there is! (hell, most of the librarians in the building think that's all there is!)

      Will they get their grant money back in Windows/Office sales from those patrons? Probably not. Do they get mindshare? Definitely. If those aging machines were to be switched to Linux, most people won't go "oh neat, no pop-ups!" or "wow, the machines seem faster" -- they'll be bitching about a lack of shockwave support or how OO.org Writer isn't like Word.

      As for books, the library carries a few Linux books. Not as many as your Windows XP/Office, and other Win32 software.

      Just had to vent -- the library grants to low-income communities are nothing more than what we've decided Microsoft is -- a drug dealer giving the first hit away for free.

    25. Re:Give the man a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the value created by OSS developers well exceeds a paltry several billion.

      Look it up.

    26. Re:Give the man a break by killjoe · · Score: 1

      All you said was that Bill Gates was not as bad as a murderer or a terrorist.

      Apparently your standards are a lot lower then mine.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    27. Re:Give the man a break by killjoe · · Score: 1

      Wow what you quoted applies almost 100% to Bill Gates.

      Incredible, thanks for the link.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    28. Re:Give the man a break by killjoe · · Score: 1

      "Wake the fuck up dumbass. There are a lot bigger evils in this world."

      Oh I guess that makes it all OK then. As long as you are not as bad as the worst evil everything is hunky dory. Go ahead and kill a few people and rape a few women, there are lot bigger evils in the world. Go ahead and steal from your boss, neighbors and parents, there are lot worse evils in the world. Go ahead and string your dog up by the neck and peel it's skin off, there are lot worse evils in the world.

      As long as you don't sink down to the level of the worst evil in the world everyhting is A-OK.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    29. Re:Give the man a break by killjoe · · Score: 1

      "Bill Gates has given over 2 billion dollars."

      No he gave aways 2 billion worth of stuff. He didn't give away 2 billion dollars. Lots of that is sofware licenses and stock, neither of which cost him a penny.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    30. Re:Give the man a break by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      No, you're incorrect. Yes, some of what bill gates gives away is stock, options, software, computers etc, but a very large portion of it is raw cash. CVF and the bill and melinda gates foundations are hugely endowed for instance, a moment's research would have shown you this.

      For example--this very article! Other similar donations have been made to many other schools--my school, Duke has gotten at least 30 mil fromes the Gates, and we still code in gcc and or java ;) (and eclipse!)

    31. Re:Give the man a break by Moridineas · · Score: 1
      No, I said you lived in a world without context, that you were a 12 year old, and that you have no understanding of scale, and I'll add to boot--your priorities are whack, and tinged by a seemingly not insignifigant amount of class jealousy. Then again, everything does seem much more intense and serious in youth and immaturity, so perhaps I am being too harsh..

      Apparently your standards are a lot lower then mine.

      Yes, see, part of being emotionally mature is not holding other people accountable to rigid standards that we ourselves (indeed, nobody!) could live up to. I have absolutely no right to critical of Bill Gates philanthropic generosity, for example... if I had donated billions, then maybe we could talk.

    32. Re:Give the man a break by CGP314 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Might I direct you here: Bill Gates: Killing Africans for Profit and P.R., by Greg Palast

      The short summary is he cost them more because of IP laws than he gave back.

      -Colin

    33. Re:Give the man a break by Council · · Score: 1

      You made a comparison [Bill Gates' evil to all other evils, calling it the worst]. Many people challenged this comparison. You've consistently responded by calling the comparison -- which you first made -- irrelevant, and bashing the challengers for making it.

      Just sayin'.

      --
      xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
    34. Re:Give the man a break by SilentChris · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "So he is giving a tiny percentage of the money he made using the most slimy and despicable methods known to mankind."

      Uh, I'd put drug dealing and stringing my enemies up by their balls (physically, not a metaphor) as the most despicable methods known to mankind.

      Gates is a businessman. A total pain in the ass, but still a businessman. I could see if the guy truly did immoral stuff (like kill thousands of people) to get his money, but he just ran a (monopolistic) business. You have an incredible crude sense of proportion.

    35. Re:Give the man a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Robin Hood legends suggest otherwise.

    36. Re:Give the man a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He said illegal and immoral, not "monocle, tophat and cigar". It's true; Gate has built his empire on illegal and immoral actions. Crushing competing businesses and taking away people's livelihoods are not things people generally consider to be moral, and Microsoft's anticompetitive actions have been ruled illegal.

      So yes, illegal and immoral. Perhaps you should get some perspective if you think "illegal and immoral" means anything other than illegal and immoral.

    37. Re:Give the man a break by Psychotext · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up.

      I've seen this regularly in society. Plenty of people moan because no-one does anything to improve society then sit on their asses doing nothing for society themselves.

      People think I'm strange because whilst I'm particularly poor, I'm always the first person to dig into my pockets to give to worthwhile charities. Recently when I couldn't donate (was having trouble paying the bills) I did a few hours at a local charity shop to help out (It makes me feel better about myself, that's no crime) .

      Why? Because there are ALWAYS people worse off than yourself, no matter how hard you think you have it.

      --
      People that believe in their opinions don't post AC.
    38. Re:Give the man a break by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1
      OK, so it was a bit over the top, but the guy has a point. People are defending Gates on the grounds that "oh well his company only broke the law multiple times, his execs only lied under oath and forged evidence, he only set out to crush his competitors using immoral means, etc which aren't REALLY bad even though they're illegal because LOOK AT THE TERRORISTS".

      That's a pretty crap defense. So the guy is giving away his ill-gotten gains. Great. Wake me up when he's learned respect for the law as well. Until then, you fall into one of two camps: you either respect the will of society or you don't. The fact that the "don't" camp also contains drug dealers and terrorists doesn't change anything.

    39. Re:Give the man a break by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      All good info, but -- and please correct me if I'm wrong -- people with enough money (to afford the setup and maintenance fees) like to use things like "foundations" to handle all their subsequent finances in order to avoid taxation. The donations are the price to be paid to have such a significant tax shelter (i.e. they have to give some money away in order for the foundation to justify existing as a charity).

      With a foundation, Bill and Melinda can take in income or capital gains, and pay essentially no tax on them -- making a mockery of the tax system imposed on the middle class. Those two people may have charitable urges like most folks do, and a foundation certainly would be helpful if only for a logo and a "non-personal" checking account, but the untold hundreds of millions in tax breaks are the real reasons that they paid some accounting firm to setup their foundation.

      If you're curious about how extreme tax breaks are getting, go read David Cay Johnston's new book "Perfectly Legal".

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    40. Re:Give the man a break by Council · · Score: 1

      I was just trying to point out why he was getting some of the hostile responses he was -- there was an inconsistency in what he said, people were trying to call him on it, and he wasn't addressing that, he was attacking . . . himself. I don't know much about Mr. Gates and his situation, I was just trying to clarify the argument/help it move along.

      --
      xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
    41. Re:Give the man a break by Mordaximus · · Score: 1
      "I suspect the charitable donations from every Linux distro CEO combined would fall well short of this."

      Ohhhh, big sacrifice. The sum of Bill's donations is probaly far far less that the intrest he'd accumulate leaving his fortunes in a bank account. My hero!

      Had it occured to you that said CEOs don't make a fraction of a money that Bill has in the bank? I'd wager the Linux distro CEOs donate a far larger percentage of their money to charity than Bill does.

      I for one, donate a much, MUCH larger percentage of my earnings each year to charity, on top of participating in charity events to raise money. It makes an impact on my lifestyle, I have to do without many things because i've chosen to support charities. On top of that, all the money I have is made through an honest day's work ; I haven't screwed taxpayers, or businesses, or customers to get it.

      At what point are you willing to overlook all of the bad that was done, just because some good came out of it in the end? I suppose you also support animal testing because it makes cosmetics safe for human use?

      P.S. Bill was a cheap ass charity wise before he married Belinda. She deserves the credit, not Bill.

    42. Re:Give the man a break by Odocoileus · · Score: 1

      Correct me if I am wrong, but I thought rich people gave charitable contributions in order to save more money in the tax area.

      --
      ...
    43. Re:Give the man a break by Thomas+Miconi · · Score: 1

      So he is giving a tiny percentage of the money he made using the most slimy and despicable methods known to mankind

      For some reason I have this feeling that you haven't seen much of what "mankind" is capable of when it comes to slimy, despicable methods of making money (Example ?)

      Thomas-

    44. Re:Give the man a break by ThousandStars · · Score: 1
      Do you really have this image of Bill Gates with a monocle, a tophat, and a cigar maniacally laughing and amusing himself with the cries of the poor?

      I've never imagined him with a monocle, but I wouldn't be suprrised.

    45. Re:Give the man a break by Penicillus · · Score: 1

      My wife is a reference librarian at a small Michigan library in a town that meets the Gates criteria for being "poor" - ie more than 20% have incomes less than the poverty line. The 4 Gates computers in her library are used constantly, and there is usually a waiting list. Many people use the Gates computers to set up Yahoo email addresses so they can be contacted by businesses, or go online to search for employment. Those computers have made a tremendous difference in helping 40-55 year olds get employment after the local industries have shut down or moved to Mexico.

    46. Re:Give the man a break by Zak3056 · · Score: 1

      the untold hundreds of millions in tax breaks are the real reasons that they paid some accounting firm to setup their foundation.

      You must've gone to the Dr. Evil School of Accounting--"Why make billions when we can make... millions!"

      Even hundreds of millions in tax breaks don't justify billions in charitible giving for anything other than altruistic reasons--the idea of giving to charity to reduce your tax burden is so that your total cost is LESS not more.

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    47. Re:Give the man a break by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

      But you still haven't provided any solid proof.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    48. Re:Give the man a break by Alomex · · Score: 1

      So he is giving a tiny percentage of the money he made using the most slimy and despicable methods known to mankind.

      Actually he's giving more than half of his fortune away. But hey, don't let the facts get in the way of your prejudices.

    49. Re:Give the man a break by potnoodle · · Score: 0

      Escobar from the Medellin drug cartel was also a "businessman"... and built schools and houses in his home town. He remains scum and died like one.

    50. Re:Give the man a break by killjoe · · Score: 1

      It's not raw cash. Bill Gates transfers stock from his name to the foundation. The foundation sells the stock and then gives away the cash. Since that stock didn't cost bill gates any money to him it's all zero cost.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    51. Re:Give the man a break by killjoe · · Score: 1

      " You made a comparison [Bill Gates' evil to all other evils"

      Bullshit. If you are going to argue with me then argue the things I said not the things you wish I said.

      I said he used the most unethical and slimy business tactics and I stand by them. He repreatedly broke the law, he signed contracts with sendo and stac and then STOLE their technologies and customers. He poached employees and technologies off of borland, he stole shit from corel.

      He has been sued and settled for hunreds of millions of dollars for those things but to him that was just the cost of doing business.

      Lying, cheating, stealing is how he made his money. Maybe he didn't actually kill anybody (I don't know) but that does not give him a pass in my book.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    52. Re:Give the man a break by killjoe · · Score: 1

      Wow I need to provde proof? What planet were you on the last decade or so?

      Just do a google for god's sake.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    53. Re:Give the man a break by Council · · Score: 1

      "You made a comparison [Bill Gates' evil to all other evils"

      Bullshit.

      I said he used the most unethical and slimy business tactics


      Actually, you left out the word 'business'. Quibble, I know, but it changes the meaning. So there, the word "most" makes it an implicit comparison to all other evils. That is what people took issue with. I guess you didn't mean to say that, but that's how it was read. That's all I'm pointing out.

      --
      xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
    54. Re:Give the man a break by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

      So otherwise none. Sure, the motives are there but where are the evidance of all those professors selling out by preaching Gates at those mentioned schools?

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    55. Re:Give the man a break by killjoe · · Score: 1

      " So otherwise none. "

      Wow you really are an idiot aren't you. Too lazy to do your own research and too stupid to know the difference between lack of proof and the unwillingness on my part to do your research for you.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    56. Re:Give the man a break by killjoe · · Score: 1

      "So there, the word "most" makes it an implicit comparison to all other evils. That is what people took issue with. I guess you didn't mean to say that, but that's how it was read. That's all I'm pointing out."

      That's all shit. The people that were defending him took the defense of "well at least he is not a murderer or a terrorist". I don't know if he killed anybody or paid to have anybody killed but I know for sure he pathologically lied, cheated and stole. Maybe you don't consider that "worst" kind of business tactic but I do.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    57. Re:Give the man a break by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

      I guess name calling makes you smarter, huh? If you haven't noticed, I posted a link to a news website whereas you didn't bother to put one up for your claims. So who's the lazy one here? If you accuse someone of evil deeds, it's your job to prove it.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    58. Re:Give the man a break by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      Wait. He's giving away billions in order to make hundreds of millions?

      No wonder he's the rich businessman, and you're the slashdot conspiracy theorist. Run the numbers before posting them, chum.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    59. Re:Give the man a break by killjoe · · Score: 1

      JUst do a google search OK? You don't need me to do one for you. Bill gates is a lying, cheating, stealing, sleazy bastard and evidence of it is abundant on the web.

      You need "PROOF" that Bill Gates is a bastard? WTF?

      --
      evil is as evil does
    60. Re:Give the man a break by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

      I didn't ask you for the proof that Bill Gates is a bastard, I already know that. Reread by previous posts as it shows that I wanted to know which of mentioned schools sold out to MS by going pro-MS due to the Gates' donations.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    61. Re:Give the man a break by Council · · Score: 1

      They brought up those comparisons because they thought you were saying "there is no 'practice' more evil than his."

      That. Is. All. I. Am. Trying. To. Say. Stop. Putting. Words. In. My. Mouth.

      --
      xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
    62. Re:Give the man a break by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      Your ire is fueled by disinformation. I repeat:

      go read David Cay Johnston's new book "Perfectly Legal"

      ... and then correct me if I'm wrong. People with massive wealth take advantage of things like foundations to achieve tax avoidance that would appear criminal to us middle-class slobs. We just don't understand the Economy of the Billions.

      The Gates family could just have written checks to people they wanted to give money to. But they chose to setup an expensive legal entity to do it. There are reasons for this related to the Economy of the Billions.

      And finally, if they are going to give away billions, then why not spend millions to arrange a financial entity that saves them 100s of millions? But that's just tax avoidance, and I refuse to give them credit for altruism for that.

      This is an almost pointless discussion, however. The rich are evolving larger schemes in larger numbers, in order to avoid paying taxes that you can't afford to avoid. It's part of the natural order during the fall of an Empire. I'm merely awaiting the time when the unwashed masses realize they own nothing while the very few elite own everything, and then some violent redistribution will take place. {shrug}

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    63. Re:Give the man a break by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      Please reference my reply to Zak3056. There's more going on behind the scenes in the Economy of the Billions than you or I can know. I used "100s of millions" as a term ... but literally, we just don't know how much money the Gates family (remember, Bill's father is involved) is washing through the foundation.

      And did you read Mr Johnston's book in the 11 hours between my posting and your reply? If so, you're a pretty dedicated reader. I await your real critique of my statements based upon your knowledge of that book. After all, there's a Bill Gates example in it that demonstrates what Bill is doing behind the scenes with his little foundation.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
  63. Wraped in DRM by tripie · · Score: 0

    Now is the new building wraped in DRM and required to only use Microsoft products.

    1. Re:Wraped in DRM by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      In other words, if I were a parnent, I could only let my children into the building, but grandchildren are off limits?

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
  64. What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All new CS graduates are coming from IIT, as in the Indian Institute of Technology. Americans just aren't skilled enough to learn CS anymore. We're getting the New and Better(tm) jobs at Burger King.

  65. one more CS dept gets a Gates building.... by keshto · · Score: 2, Informative
    If you think CMU sold out by letting Gates give money, you are mistaken. Gates has been a major giver for many of the major new CS Dept buildings in many campuses. And no, there are usually no strings attached from Bill Gates. Here's the current list, AFAIR:
    • Stanford CS: Gates Bldg
    • MIT EECS: (half only) Gates Tower in the Stata Center (Bldg 32). The brand spanking new Gehry building
    • Harvard CS: Maxwell Dworkin. Harvard has a standing policy of not naming buildings after living people and Bill Gates usually wants his dad's name at the doorside. So they instead put the maiden names of Gates' and Balmer's moms on the building
    Berkeley's Soda Hall, their current CS abode, is probably too old. I won't be surprised if they too got a CS building named Gates Hall.
    Of the other univs in the top-10, UIUC has the Seibel Center. Dunno about Princeton, UTexas, Cornell and the others...
    1. Re:one more CS dept gets a Gates building.... by ajayvb · · Score: 1

      For $50 million, Viterbi of Qualcomm got a whole engineering school in his name . I am sure $20 million for a building isn't that bad. But, I'd have preferred it to be named after Turing. Even Raj Reddy , Turing Award Winner wouldn't have been a bad choice. He's alive and still active in research, but then, so is Bill Gates.

  66. In acknowledgment of Mr. Gates' profound influence by currivan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...on the computer software industry, it should have robust barriers to entry.

  67. Update Available.... by sussotheclown · · Score: 1

    I can imagine at some stage in the corner of the building. "A new update is available". These new updates will randomly add new features. Such as: - Upgrade (Another floor which is completely useless). - Security has been upgraded (some doors dont open anymore!). - More stable (we've added a required support!) - Windows Security Centre improvement (we've added a guard station, but hired no guards.) And more and more....

  68. Better link by linefeed0 · · Score: 1

    CMU claims it has 138 alumni working for Microsoft which is about the size of one year's graduating class in CS.

  69. Evil Robber Baron Mr.Carnegie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know who remembers Carnegie fondly. Most people could care less who their library is named after. I associate Carnegie with the other robber barons of the time, and his philanthropy as a classic case of a guilty conscience. Not to mention the confusion over the pronunciation of the name: Carn-a-gee or carn-egg-ee. In the future maybe people will misprounce Bill's name as Ja-tees. and now from the Jaytees Foundation..

  70. So what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's ging away MY money, your money and everyone else's money. It is easy to give if you have a lot of it. The issue is, how did he get it. We all know that.

    He should give the money back to all the people he stole it from.

  71. Any stipulations? by methangel · · Score: 1

    I wonder if only the Windows Operating System and related software is allowed within the building ... in order for that large of a donation to be made. No Unix/Linux or Open Source allowed!

    If not, then that was quite a generous donation from Mr. Gates.

    Linux is like a wigwam -- no Windows, no Gates, Apache inside.

    1. Re:Any stipulations? by Maul · · Score: 1

      From what I've seen, Microsoft donations often come with such strings attached.

      Now, this is a donation from Gates himself (not the company) so perhaps no such strings exist.

      --

      "You spoony bard!" -Tellah

    2. Re:Any stipulations? by pfriedma · · Score: 1

      Given that most of CS at CMU expects access to *NIX, it's doubtful that only Windows machines will be used; People will complain WAAAYYY too much about having to remotely connect to Andrew over cygwin or xwin32.

      --
      Mak'tal shree lok'tak mek'ta sa'tak Oz! - Daniel Jackson
  72. XP BSOD == Cold Reboot by EventHorizon · · Score: 1, Informative

    IIRC many of the errors which caused blue screens in Win2K/Win9X were changed in XP to just cold reboot the machine. This behavior change can make it seem to Joe User like the power glitched, a hardware fault caused an NMI, etc, instead of Windows just flaking out for some random reason.

    If the above is true, Microsoft has executed a brilliant act of market deception, even against highly technical users.

    [Disclaimer: I've never run WinXP. I will certainly accept factual corrections from someone with an accurate knowledge of its internals].

    1. Re:XP BSOD == Cold Reboot by Lt.Hawkins · · Score: 1

      its configurable. In the system properties, you can set windows to write a small, medium, or large memory dump, and automatically reboot. I think the "auto reboot" bit is on by default, but why not? it helps recover from an error faster, which means less down time in production. The log is still there, and it defaults to a relatively small size (64kb maybe?) so that the write-out is relatively quick too.

      --
      -- My Sig is a P228.
    2. Re:XP BSOD == Cold Reboot by bob65 · · Score: 2, Informative
      If the above is true, Microsoft has executed a brilliant act of market deception, even against highly technical users.

      Yes it is true. There is a checkbox in system settings under the System Failure section that says "Automatically restart". It is checked by default.

    3. Re:XP BSOD == Cold Reboot by killjoe · · Score: 1

      I know that happened to me in W2K. Somehow the update to the media player started causing my machine to randomly shut down. Mostly it happened when I was trying to watch movies but sometimes it happened out of the blue too.

      Of course it meant a complete wipe and reinstall.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    4. Re:XP BSOD == Cold Reboot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that's the way any good OS would do it. XP, being built on NT has the event log, as opposed to win3.0-98 so you can always see what happened later on. The important thing is to have maximum availability. I don't see this as an act of deceoption by any means.

      Unless of course you're too lazy to view your logs.... Server2003 did something about that by displaying alerts for critical errors when an administrator logs on.

    5. Re:XP BSOD == Cold Reboot by recursiv · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Textbook FUD.

      It does show a BSOD. It does also have a countdown to reboot. I've seen it. It's definitely not fast enough that someone would miss it or blame it on glitchy power. (at least 30 seconds)

      The fact that no one else seems to have seen this is evidence that WinXP is indeed more stable than Win9x. In my experience this is unquestionably true. In my experience Win9x crashing was a regular occurrence. The only time WinXP has rebooted is when I've rebooted it or there was a power outage. (yes, a real one with clocks losing their time too)

      The only BSOD I have seen from WinXP is my room mate's laptop trying to go into power saving mode.

      --
      I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants
    6. Re:XP BSOD == Cold Reboot by bratmobile · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      This is an outright LIE. XP will NEVER intentionally spontaneously reboot.

      The kernel-mode error checking is MORE STRICT in XP than it was in Windows 2000. In other words, if Windows or a driver does something stupid, a BSOD is more likely to occur -- which is a good thing, because if an error DOES occur, you want to know about it.

      Microsoft provides Driver Verifier for all 3rd parties who are developing device drivers, and they are required to use it in order to validate their drivers before getting certified.

      This is just more UNIX FUD and LIES. Why is it acceptable to say "I've never run WinXP" when WRITING about XP, which is equivalent to saying "I DON'T KNOW A DAMN THING ABOUT WHAT I AM ABOUT TO SAY."

      If you are ignorant, then SHUT THE HELL UP or go get educated about it first.

    7. Re:XP BSOD == Cold Reboot by m_pll · · Score: 1
      This behavior change can make it seem to Joe User like the power glitched...

      After a power glitch you don't get the "Windows has recovered from a serious error... Do you want to submit error report to Microsoft?" dialog on the next boot.

      ...a hardware fault caused an NMI, etc, instead of Windows just flaking out for some random reason.

      BSODs can and do often happen as a result of hardware faults. The only way to find out if it's caused by hardware or Windows "flaking out" is to analyze the crash dump with a kernel debugger.

    8. Re:XP BSOD == Cold Reboot by sparkz · · Score: 4, Informative

      If that's UNIX FUD, it's a very strange form of it, as UNIX has many intentional forced-reboots.

      The more Highly-Available you get, the more forced-reboot paths you get. Counterintuitive? Look at SunCluster. When it detects a condition which could, even only theoretically, cause data corruption, any potentially-dangerous node will deliberately PANIC itself.
      Take a simple 2-node cluster, with storage shared between them. When everything's running smoothly, they can both write to the shared storage. If the interconnect between them dies, then neither node can know the state of the other node. Both race to put a SCSI reserve on the quorum device (the SCSI protocol ensures that only one can succeed) - any nodes which fail to get their SCSI reserve on the quorum device will kill themselves the fastest way possible - the "failfast" driver.
      It might turn out that it would have been safe for them to stay around and shut down cleanly, but with mission-critical data, it is not worth taking the risk - don't even pause to work out if it's safe - those microseconds could trash the database.

      UNIX is perfectly happy to accept the possibility of unknown bugs, and take responsibility for them in advance, as well as for external hardware faults. If a reboot may be needed, it's better to lose uptime than to lose data.
      And, of course, uptime is something in which UNIX excels, so it's not even much of a compromise.

      FWIW, I believe that Windows clustering has a similar quorum model, although the Windows view of clustering appears to be rather more conservative.

      --
      Author, Shell Scripting : Expert Re
    9. Re:XP BSOD == Cold Reboot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it isn't. XP will definately reboot the machine on some errors. Wether or not it is a deliberate attempt at deception I don't know, but it most certainly happens. Maybe you should try XP sometime yourself?

    10. Re:XP BSOD == Cold Reboot by Compholio · · Score: 1, Informative

      The fact that no one else seems to have seen this is evidence that WinXP is indeed more stable than Win9x.

      I have seen the BSOD on XP several times, and yes - it does reboot almost instantly. I've even run into the problem on boot, so I couldn't even change the option if I wanted to because I couldn't read the error code to look it up and fix the machine. Ended up having to run the repair tool on the CD and it fixed whatever it was that was wrong (not preferred way of fixing things).

    11. Re:XP BSOD == Cold Reboot by EventHorizon · · Score: 1

      Heh. I guess it's good to hear that Microsoft finally "innovated" a software watchdog timer similar to what's been in Linux et al for five or six years.

      BTW chill out. I hate every OS.

    12. Re:XP BSOD == Cold Reboot by EventHorizon · · Score: 1

      Wow +5 back down to +1 in five minutes. Maybe the mozilla exploit actually took out more Linux mods than the IE exploit did Windows mods?

    13. Re:XP BSOD == Cold Reboot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least on XP, it also pops up a Qwality Feedback window asking if you want to send your dump to Microsoft. So, it's not likely a knowledgeable user would miss it.

    14. Re:XP BSOD == Cold Reboot by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

      The more Highly-Available you get, the more forced-reboot paths you get.

      I recall a slashdot discussion where someone was arguing that Linux was "better" because, when a NIC driver took a dump, (sometimes) you could just unload the module and continue on with life minus a panic.

      This always seemed like a suspect design decision -- NT usually halts because it knows something is wrong. I'm not sure if Linux thinks things are AOK or just gives you the "freedom" to have memory corrupted by a bad driver.

      (Although, I've noticed that XP will sometimes dynamically load a SVGA driver when my ATI stuff goes to hell.)

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    15. Re:XP BSOD == Cold Reboot by Xenna · · Score: 1

      I've seen it twice, the last time when I was playing with my new Airport Express WAP. Apparently something went wrong with the drivers, I probably shouldn't have used 0.0.0.0 as an IP address ;-)

      I use 5 XP machines (as well as a number of Linux servers) on a regular basis since XP came out and these events are very rare. I have never had a spontaneous reboot at all. I sometimes reboot when the system becomes sluggish or to clear up some error, but that doesn't happen that often either.

      I'm no MS fan, but XP seems stable enough if you have your security & patches set up right and if you're running on decent hardware.

      I'm no fan of people saying things like 'the truth hurts' in sigs either. It seems to suggest that everyone else is hiding from the facts except your enlightened self. As for me, these are my experiences, no more, no less.

    16. Re:XP BSOD == Cold Reboot by Sage+Gaspar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know if this is necessarily a deceptive move or not (I think it might have been just to keep people from going crazy when "fatal error" or something popped up), but I can confirm that my OEM XP CD as of last month and a Win 2000 version from last year or so both came with a "Reboot upon system error" option checked.

      Removing it involved delving into the registry in 2000, but there's a simple checkbox in XP.

      Either way, it was a royal pain the first time I discovered this "feature" when my Win2K box got a virus and began crashing on boot to windows, thus ending up in an infinite reboot cycle with no real way of understanding what was happening. It took me a while just to get it to stop rebooting, and THEN I had to repair the virus.

    17. Re:XP BSOD == Cold Reboot by ezzzD55J · · Score: 1
      "It does show a BSOD. It does also have a countdown to reboot. I've seen it. It's definitely not fast enough that someone would miss it or blame it on glitchy power. (at least 30 seconds)"

      This is true. I've seen it too. In my case, turned out to be faulty memory. (Peculiar - win ME was running on that box with no problems, but when I installed win xp the weirdest things started happening.)

    18. Re:XP BSOD == Cold Reboot by DuctTape · · Score: 1
      It does show a BSOD. It does also have a countdown to reboot. I've seen it. It's definitely not fast enough that someone would miss it or blame it on glitchy power. (at least 30 seconds)

      Then you must have a lame machine. Mine gives me one second. Before I learned the uncheck-the-auto-restart-checkbox trick, I had to go through about a dozen stops before I got everything written down. Course, you have to get your machine to the point where you can uncheck that box. Go figure.

      DT

      --
      Is this thing on? Hello?
    19. Re:XP BSOD == Cold Reboot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      At least on XP, it also pops up a Qwality Feedback window asking if you want to send your dump to Microsoft.

      Yeah, I'd like to send my dump to MS. Who should I send it to? : p

    20. Re:XP BSOD == Cold Reboot by sharkey · · Score: 1

      You still get the BSOD with that enabled. All that does is display the BSOD until the memdump is finished. If you use the small dump option, you probably don't even see the BSOD, it just seems to restart.

      IIRC, it's enabled in XP by default, and disabled in Win2k by default.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    21. Re:XP BSOD == Cold Reboot by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      Why was this modded up? Yes, in the spontaneous reboots people are talking about, a BSOD still occurs. The thing is, XP defaults to doing a riny memory dump, and redaults to rebooting the machine as soon as the dump is finished. Many CRT displays don't even have a chance to re-sync on the lower blue-screen resolution before the computer reboots. So, to many users, it appears to be a spontaneous reboot with no interstitial blue screen.

      --
      ± 29 dB
    22. Re:XP BSOD == Cold Reboot by sparkz · · Score: 1

      Depends on what you want - the approach you describe means that the machine stays up and running, which might be a good thing, but if that is the only NIC in the box, then nobody can talk to it any more, so what's the point in it running? On the other hand, it may be a redundant NIC (can Linux device drivers do this?), in which case, keeping running is the right thing to do. On the third hand, if you don't notice that it's gone down, and that NIC is to your backup server, and you don't monitor the machine closely, you might not know that you haven't backed it up for 3 months until you look at the logs!

      --
      Author, Shell Scripting : Expert Re
    23. Re:XP BSOD == Cold Reboot by JamesGecko · · Score: 1

      Dude, you seriously don't know what you are talking about. Don't automaticly assume that just because it's never happened to you that it's wrong. XP *DOES* and *WILL* spontaneously reboot. I have had this problem before. There is a built in option deep inside the os that will make it reboot if it encounters what it considers to be a serious error. This rarely ever occours, but when it does it's usaly not because of a serious error. Back when I had a USB DSL modem, I had a horable time with these sudden restarts. It turned out that some USB devices can set off a false alarm with XP's internal error-recovery-reboot thing. Thus, every 30 minutes or so the computer would reboot. I finaly discovered that if I moved the modem's cord to my second set of USB ports on the back of the computer that the problems would cease. Truly strange. However, this is a documented problem, you just have to search for the right things. It's things like this that make me glad that I have a copy of Linux.

    24. Re:XP BSOD == Cold Reboot by Maestro4k · · Score: 1
      • I have seen the BSOD on XP several times, and yes - it does reboot almost instantly. I've even run into the problem on boot, so I couldn't even change the option if I wanted to because I couldn't read the error code to look it up and fix the machine. Ended up having to run the repair tool on the CD and it fixed whatever it was that was wrong (not preferred way of fixing things).
      We had a power outage last Friday thanks to Ivan blowing through the state and it lasted long enough that my UPS ran out of juice and the XP box went down. Later in the day I turned it on and left the room to do something while it booted, I didn't get back to it for a while, no biggie it runs 24x7 normally anyway. Well when I got back I found it in an infinite boot, BSOD, reboot cycle. The BSOD wasn't even given time to fully draw on the screen before the reboot kicked in. I was able to get into the box using "last known good configuration" (which ironically should have been the same, as nothing had been added/modified since the last boot) but it kept wanting to do the BSOD on reboots. I finally got it fixed by re-applying SP2, somehow that made a difference to XP.

      So yes, XP may not crash as much as Win9x, but it's by no means immune, and the reasons for it are near impossible to determine sometimes.

  73. Times have changed by TequilaJunction · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When I went to CMU (back in the days before the WWW) the new technology on campus was by by Apple. Our computer clusters (which were called Apple Orchards - sigh) were about 50% Apple, 20% Unix, and 30% Microsoft. There was a big NeXT following in the very early days as well. I guess we're not going to see a push for alternative OS's there in the near future. As a side note, one more new building on that campus isn't going to make much of a difference. It's looked wrong ever since they tore down Skibo.

    1. Re:Times have changed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Skibo was a building?? Where?

      I really doubt though that this will affect what is in the clusters.

    2. Re:Times have changed by amper · · Score: 1

      Wait a minute...they TORE DOWN Skibo?!!!? When did that happen? Man I should really take a trip back to ol' Picksburg...

    3. Re:Times have changed by amper · · Score: 1

      Well, when *I* went to CMU (apparently even further back in the days before the WWW), NeXT didn't really even exist yet, because Avi Tevanian was still a grad student at CMU writing the Mach microkernel, if my memory serves me correctly...

      There were lots of labs full of Mac SE's (upon which I dutifully typed many papers), not so many IBM PC's (on Token Ring, no less), plenty of Sun workstations, and a strange thing cooked up by CMU and IBM called the Andrew System, which ran primarily on an odd little device called the IBM PC RT...which was the forerunner of the RS/6000 series.

      Ah, sometimes I wonder whatever happened to my old ma1s+@andrew.cmu.edu account...and the little Andrew console program I wrote called Fenchurch...I wasn't much of a coder (really, I was a Technical Production student in the Theatre Department, but much of what I was trying to do at the time involved integration of computer automation technologies into the theatre lighting and sound systems--sadly, none of the faculty understood what it was I was trying to do), but I was fond of the little markup language that was used at the time to cook up those little dashboards.

      Among other things, we also have that time period to thank for the Andrew File System (which turned into probably the first globally-available distributed file system) and the forerunner of the Cyrus IMAP software, the Andrew Mail System (without which email would be quite a bit different today--many well-known commercial email systems are based on Cyrus).

      I spent way too many hours in the flash cube...the Internet was cool even back in the mid-80's...some would say even cooler than it is now.

      Oh, and the TOPS-20 systems were still on-line back then!

  74. Aaaarrrghhhhh!!! by prash_n_rao · · Score: 0

    "2.Set up a future harvesting ground for hiring into his empire when the time is right."

    Job openings easily available for future graduates? Is that so bad? Is he really screwing up their future by hiring them? That answer is extremely subjective.

    "3.Spread the good word about Microsoft - 20mil worth of marketing does not seem to have the same effect."

    Microsoft is NOT donating $20M... The Gates Foundation is. Do NOT confuse the two. Anyway, how exactly is this beneficial to Microsoft? Will it persuade more people to opt for Microsoft's products? Will it help Microsoft in various anti-trust lawsuits? I don't think so.

    To put it mildly, I don't always hold Microsoft in the highest regard. But this is not about Microsoft.

    --
    This is not my sig.
  75. You know Gates could save a lot of face.... by Baldrson · · Score: 1
    All Gates has to do to save a lot of face is start setting up prizes like the Ansari X-Prize -- prizes for accomplished goals rather than promises to attempt to accomplish goals.

    Have some fun with philanthropy while making it more cost-effective.

  76. Re:Poor rich Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People always hate the big guy until they get a chance to be a part.

    Doesn't change the validity of hating them.

    people will be very quick to badmouth the US, but start giving out free plane tickets and you'll get mobbed.

    Classic US attitude. Treat non-US'ians as if they were single group. The US is a tiny fraction of the world's population. Many of the world's population like the US, largely because of Hollywood escapism. Many informed people don't.

    Yes, I know I'm treating the US as a single group. See how it feels?

  77. enough with the innuendos! by JMZorko · · Score: 1
    OK, i'm not the biggest WIndows fan either, but come on -- this was a generous act. Besides, Mr. Gates likely was not intimately involved in creating the various Windows bugs that caused so many BSODs. Windows has come a long way. It still has a long way to go, but progress is being made.

    Yikes, this is weird -- i'm suddenly _defending_ Windows a lot more than I normally do lately, even though I prefer *nix. Funky.

    Regards,

    John

    --
    Falling You - beautiful
  78. Best BSOD comment! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod funny

  79. so sad for your false perception of reality by Neuroelectronic · · Score: 1

    all his money? statisticly it is a waste of time for Bill to pick up $50 thousand off the ground because in the time it takes to pick it up, he would have already made that much. 20 million to bill is like 20 bucks to us

  80. I guess he wants his own building... by Rufus211 · · Score: 1

    because BILL PH34RZ WEAN!!1!1

    (from when he came to speak on campus last year).

    1. Re:I guess he wants his own building... by pfriedma · · Score: 1

      There was also a giant penguin on the roof of the UC that day... but it was taken down really fast :(

      --
      Mak'tal shree lok'tak mek'ta sa'tak Oz! - Daniel Jackson
  81. Firewall by toetagger1 · · Score: 1

    Will include build-in firewalls?

    Sorry, I just had to do this!

    --
    who | grep -i blond | date cd ~; unzip; touch; strip; finger; mount; gasp; yes; uptime; umount; sleep
  82. OSQ by mrgsd · · Score: 1

    "It looks so much better...a beautiful sky blue"

    *helicopter crashes into it*

    --
    End Communication.
  83. Poor Bill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Even when he tries to do something nice, he gets flamed. The man just donated 20 million to the school. give him a break

    Why think when you can just accept the hype at face value? Congratulations on being a marketer's (and Republican strategist's) wet dream.

  84. You stopped reading half a sentence too early. by Aqua_Geek · · Score: 1

    You missed the last half of the quote: Gates is phenomenally good at pleasing consumers--that is, at creating wealth for others.

    Think about it: how much money is spent by corporations annually to hire consultants to fix their Windoze boxes after they have been exploited? This man's a genius! Look at all that wealth he has created! As the saying goes, If you're not part of the solution, there's good money to be made in prolonging the problem.

    --
    Disclaimer: This comment was generated by a Flock of Trained Microsoft Programmers for Aqua_Geek.
    1. Re:You stopped reading half a sentence too early. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      falacy

    2. Re:You stopped reading half a sentence too early. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fellacio

    3. Re:You stopped reading half a sentence too early. by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      That's not creating wealth, anymore than a hurricane destroying a city is creating wealth. (I think you might be sarcastic here, but it's not obvious and I'm sure some people fell for it, so I will explain the economic theory behind 'wealth'.)

      Wealth is, roughly, how far human beings have gotten in making 'stuff'. You can generate it via creating things or indirectly by moving things or doing work that frees up other people to create things.

      Destroying things, or creating things that don't work as well as they could, removes wealth. For every hour someone spends fixing a Windows box back to a good state, they could have been creating wealth, instead they're running as fast as they can to stay in one place.

      Claiming otherwise is akin to claiming that a cup with a leak will hold more water, and, thus, more water will be created. The fallacy there is that cups don't have anything to do with the production of water. Water just exists, and can neither be created of destroyed. (Okay, yes, it can, but this is an analogy.) A leak means you will put more in the cup than otherwise, so other cups get less. (Of course, at this point you can get into supply and demand, and point out a leaky cup creates a higher demand, so the price of water will go up, which will 'help' the people selling water. But hurt everyone else.)

      Likewise, the amount of work the human race can do is fairly constant, and wealth is the amount of work actually done minus however much it takes to stay in the same place. Creating more work does not automatically create more wealth, and if it's work getting things back to how they were, it will never create wealth. (Well, okay, technically, it destroys wealth and creates new wealth.)

      That's not to say you can't increase the creation of wealth. You just either need to make more people work, or you need to make them more productive, or you need to make things last longer. And there are probably some other ways I can't think of right now.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  85. Only part of required funds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The $20 million only covers part of the project, estimated to cost more than $50 million. The new building will replace several others, drastically changing the campus. According VP of University Advancement, it's just part of their funding goal: "Do we aspire for $1 billion? Yes. Is that our goal? No," said Kosak.. Alumnus Tepper donated $55 million in the spring to the business school, which was renamed the Tepper School of Business. Gates couldn't put up a couple extra mill to have the CS school named after him?

  86. Give Bill a Break by buchalka · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I can't stand people who bash Bill and his foundation. Sure bash Microsoft if you must, but why the foundation?

    Yes he is mega rich but he still doesn't have to give the money away does he?

    I am sure he could find other ways to get rid of the money. Instead he is doing some good.

    His foundation has practically wiped our Malaria in third world countries.

    I suppose he did that for advertising as well??

    No I am not a MS support, Linux is my vehicle of choice, but I am man enough to applaud someone doing good for the community.

    Would be nice if some of the wallies posted here could do the same.

    Yeah I know, fat chance of that.

    --
    Games Programmer And Designer
    1. Re:Give Bill a Break by Bull999999 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I can't stand people who bash Bill and his foundation. Sure bash Microsoft if you must, but why the foundation?

      It's probably because he makes most of people here look bad with his charity work. You always see posts on slashdot about helping the poor and promoting open source software but how many slashdotters actually put their money where their mouth is?

      I'll most likely get flamed by slashdotters who will complain that they never have any money left over to donate, yet somehow find ways to pay for their high speed internet connection, cell phones, ultra fast computers, games, and other useless toys.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    2. Re:Give Bill a Break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I'd like to see Jobs, Ellison or Stallman do anything close to that.

      Just a bunch of tired blowhards with no socially redeaming values.

    3. Re:Give Bill a Break by Akki · · Score: 1
      Actually, he DOES have to give it away.

      If he didn't, the government would just take it in taxes - might as well do something that makes you look good instead, right?

      You'll find few multimillionars or better that don't donate a ton to charity - they desperately need the tax break.

    4. Re:Give Bill a Break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Minor point: malaria is nowhere close to being wiped out. The Gates Foundation gave a lot of money to malaria research, and according to the article, that's been a key factor in revitalizing the field. Eliminating malaria will take a breakthrough; Gates has helped provide the environment in which it can be made.

    5. Re:Give Bill a Break by KeyHolder · · Score: 1

      That's the stupidest thing I've ever heard.

      Suppose you're taxed at 40% (the maximum income tax rate in the US) and you give $1 to charity. Assuming your itemized deductions are high enough, this will reduce your income by $1, which reduces your tax bill by $0.40. So, you give away a dollar and get 40 cents back. That is not a money-making proposition.

      Besides, the US taxes on income, not assets except for some things like real estate. If most of your wealth is in securities, like Bill, then you don't pay any tax at all on the principal, just on any income your investments generate. Those taxes will reduce, but not eliminate, that income and won't touch the principal at all.

      So, if you have a ton of money and want to continue to maximize your wealth, giving to charity doesn't help at all. It reduces the taxes you pay, but not by as much as you're giving away.

      Only stupid people with no money and not so much as the most basic understanding of the tax system think rich people make money by giving to charity.

    6. Re:Give Bill a Break by 200_success · · Score: 1

      We bash the Gates Foundation for the same reason that Marge Simpson refused Tobacco-industry money for her children's group PPASSCCATAG. Sure, the money would have been for a good cause, but it's still tainted money because of its source.

      Well, it's a bit of an exaggeration to compare Microsoft to the tobacco industry, as the latter is far more evil and has done much more harm. But for the Slashdot crowd, most of us feel that Gates earned his money unfairly in the first place by killing competition and stifling innovation -- issues that are dear to our hearts. I've heard it quoted that 1% of every dollar spent in the economy goes to Microsoft. And for that situation to have arisen, Gates screwed over many of our heroes.

      Whether it's his intention or not, it feels like Gates is trying to buy redemption for his sins. I think the Slashdot crowd would be happier if he renounced his nefarious methods by breaking up Microsoft or by getting his company to stop acting like a bully.

    7. Re:Give Bill a Break by potnoodle · · Score: 0

      Bill Gates , pre-"vaccinate the kids,we are the world communications counseling" era : "It's as hard giving out money as it is to earn it ." When answering to "Why don't you give out more of your vast wealth?" Enough said.

    8. Re:Give Bill a Break by varebel · · Score: 1

      I can't stand people who bash Bill and his foundation. Sure bash Microsoft if you must, but why the foundation?

      Perhaps due to the strings attached to The Gates Foundations' "gifts"?

      My roommate spent 2 years working as the network admin at a public library. During her employment there, a number of machines were donated by the Gates Foundation. More than they could use, in fact.

      She proposed taking the extra machines and loading Linux on them to try it out in a few services they were having trouble with. Most notably, an aging Exchange server which was requiring almost weekly reboots at 15 minute a reboot. They weren't using any of the workgroup functions of Exchange. Any basic mail exchanger would've sufficed.

      In any event, upon pursuing this project, she was shot down immediatly. Apparently, the agreement that the library signed as a condition of receiving these "gifts" stated that they must not load any other OS software on the machines. If they did so, all support, including warranty for failed hardware, would be pulled for all donated systems.

      So, even through The Gates Foundation's "generosity", it's clearly has an agenda to protect and extend the Microsoft Monopoly.

      They were able to come up with a work-around, if you will. They invested in an additional set of hard drives for one of the extra Gates machines on which Linux was loaded and a mail server set up. The original hard drives were static wrapped and stored away so that, in the event of a hardware failure on that machine, they could be replaced for the purposes of tech support and diagnostics.

      The truely frightening part is the grip that Microsoft still had on the administrative personel there. Even after 6 months of flawless mail operation with no downtime, administration was still considering spending over $2000 on the latest Exchange Server and Outlook for all the workstations. *shakes head*

    9. Re:Give Bill a Break by korbin_dallas · · Score: 1

      Uh, for your information, Gates donations has not wiped out malaria, or even made a dent.

      DDT nearly wiped out malaria by eradicating its carrier.

      But then a bunch of environmental asswipes moved to outlaw DDT and malaria epidemics cames back. But I really suspect that the DDT manufs were paid off by the Quanine drug manufacturers, since it also destroyed their market.

      --
      They Live, We Sleep
    10. Re:Give Bill a Break by Britz · · Score: 1

      From the article You linked to:

      "The Gates Foundation has committed more than U.S. $100 million so far: $50 million to launch a malaria vaccine initiative; $40 million to a malaria research program at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine; and $25 million to Medicines for Malaria Venture, a public-private project promoting malaria drug treatments."

      and!!!!

      " The World Health Organization estimates it will take U.S. $10 billion to rid the planet of malaria by 2010, noting that the economic benefit of eliminating the disease would make up the cost within a year."

      Bill Gates's foundation has NOT "practically wiped our Malaria in third world countries."

      I have no idea, why those stupid moderators gave You any points on Your complete BS. They deserve a spanking for that one.

      Malaria is a huge problem and Bill Gates has done a lot of good with all the money from the Microsoft monopoly. Without Microsoft there would have been competition on the OS market and computers would be much easier to use as a result, but also OSS would probabely never have taken off.

      All that doesn't justify Your BS about malaria, which still presents a huge problem for many, many people but doesn't get solved for good capitalistic reasons. And captilasim is always right, isn't it?
      Apart from all that

    11. Re:Give Bill a Break by Maechtig · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Internal Revenue Service require charitable foundations to disburse a certain percentage of their assets every year, in order to retain their charitable, tax-exempt status..

      --
      Gee, it's so tough to find a place to park around here!
  87. Screw You Mr.Gates by tron21 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I am a student at CMU, we knew about this yesterday. They announced it by handing out fliers with a drawing of the new building on it. Well it turns out that the building and the Society of Automotive Engineers http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/org/sae/ garage seem to occupy the same space. Hum, I wonder what is going to happen to our garage. Dear Mr.Gates, do you think you could spare an extra $30,000 to help build something other then more computer clusters on our campus?

    1. Re:Screw You Mr.Gates by SansTinfoilHat · · Score: 1

      Well it turns out that the building and the Society of Automotive Engineers http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/org/sae/ garage seem to occupy the same space. Hum, I wonder what is going to happen to our garage. "Sorry Mr. Gates, there is a tiny garage where we were going to put your building. Oh well. I heard Case Western needs some money."

  88. U guys have problems by opweirdisntit · · Score: 0

    Bill here just donated 20 mil and u guys go on ranting about how he is pure evil from the darkside.
    1) you guys analyze way too much...
    2) no you arnt the smartest people in the world slashdoters
    3) god damn can u leave that guy alone once? i dont love him or anything (i dont even have windows installed anywhere in my house ~_~) but just shutup for once god damnit. You go get some money and tell me if u'd do anythign differently (if u say u would that i add #4 to the list [you guys are ignorant fags])

    1. Re:U guys have problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh. Ironic that you talk about intelligence.

    2. Re:U guys have problems by potnoodle · · Score: 0

      AHAHAHAHAHAH I'd love to lock you up in a lab until I saw you go slowly but surely insane when faced with the truth about Gates. (you'd have to get your food through a windows interface machine as well for the purpose of an amusing blooper tape)

  89. Generosity, or just PR? by symbolic · · Score: 3, Interesting


    I say PR. If it were an act of generosity, Gates would have encouraged them to come up with a more creative name. Nothing like the ego of someone with too much money, too much power, or just a delusional state of having either.

  90. Rude? by mrscott · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I totally agree. In fact, it was downright despicable to give the campus only $20 MILLION dollars out of the $50 million needed to actually complete the structure. He should just go back to campus, apologize for his rudeness, rip up the check he gave to the college and go home and write a letter of apology for his rudeness.

    Who cares if he's really rich? If he gave away $20 million every day, he wouldn't be for very long, would he? No matter how you look at it, $20 million is a LOT of money.

    I am sometimes absolutely appalled by the unappreciative nature of some people.

    1. Re:Rude? by cosmol · · Score: 4, Informative
      If he gave away $20 million every day, he wouldn't be for very long, would he?

      Depends if you think 5.5 years is very long

    2. Re:Rude? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Mrs. Cott,

      I've always wondered what happened to you after I left middle school. Are you still teaching 8th grade math?

    3. Re:Rude? by brilinux · · Score: 1

      What, so only one of us gets to be sarcastic? I guess that you did not get that the whole rudeness thing was sarcasm, as was the bit about more construction, and so was the thing about opposing forces. Everybody here is very excited about the new building, especially since what it will replace is an ugly piece of crap, and the fact that we will get more gifts and recognition is good.
      Take a joke (though at first, I did not know that you were being sarcastic, so I guess we are even, and I guess that my original post does not come off as too sarcastic anyway. Sorry for the confusion).

    4. Re:Rude? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well i don't. and no one over the age of 25 does either.

    5. Re:Rude? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah... $30 billion / $20 million = 4 years of such gifts. Given that his net worth has increased at a rate of almost 30% per year since 1986, thats $24 million dollars a day right now. So he CAN in fact give away $20 million every day!

    6. Re:Rude? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You also have to admit that as soon as Bill and Melinda donate, many others will begin to. It takes someone of a big name to get things kicked off.

      That is, unless your name is Tepper, and you donate 55 million straight up.

      - DCM TX

    7. Re:Rude? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it's closer to 7.7 years, you forget that he makes about 5.5 million a day (2 billion / 365).

    8. Re:Rude? by antiMStroll · · Score: 1
      Everyone seems to forget that Bill Gates gave them nothing, the money was donated by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which is not their personal bank account. The Foundation made $4 billion in investments and received $81 million in donations in 2003. It's net worth increased that year by $2.7 billion. The financial records are on the Foundation site. What they're doing is beneficial, no doubt, but please quit implying this is "Bill's pile of money" which he doles to worthy causes the same way you or I donate to charities. This is an entirely different game:

      http://yahoo.reuters.com/financeQuoteCompanyNewsAr ticle.jhtml?duid=mtfh72812_2004-09-04_02-22-58_sp9 6863_newsml

    9. Re:Rude? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      However, by the time that he gave that all away, he would have earned a great deal more just off the interest, nevermind the continuing income from MS.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    10. Re:Rude? by orange7 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, whatever.

      It actually *could* be a problem if he does have naming rights. CMU has a reasonable number of alumni at Google who they're no doubt looking to hit up over the next year or two, and, given that in general there's not a lot of love lost between the two companies, it might be heavy going persuading them to cough up money for a building named after Gates.

      I mean, it's hard to look askance at $20 million, but...

    11. Re:Rude? by morganjharvey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But this money isn't from Bill Gates himself -- it's from the Bill and Melinda Foundation. While I'm sure that Billy there gives them quite a chunk of coin every so often, that money is often invested and allowed to expand. I guess the true question would be how much money does the foundation have?

      I think that the foundation has done a lot of things that are absolutely great (I'm told my local YWCA wrote a letter asking for assistance in building a new wing and remodelling and received a very sizeable check very shortly afterwards, very few questions asked) and I don't know why anybody would grouse about genuine philanthropy. It's very hard to say that he set up the foundation to create some sort of tax loophole given the fact that he has told the press (right about the time of Bush's tax cuts...) that he thinks the rich should pay _more_ in taxes (too lazy to look up a link -- do it yourself). The man literally has so much money that he doesn't know what to do with it. I'd rather that it comes out in the form of donations than being holed up in some bank account somewhere.

      And plus, if this were a marketing ploy, why not just have Microsoft donate the money?

      Just my two cents...
      -mo

    12. Re:Rude? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they need $50 million, why doesn't Bill just write the cheque for 50 instead of 20? As if he would notice a paltry 30 million difference...:-)
      Bill is being the cheapskate, as always, but wants his name out there...

    13. Re:Rude? by mrscott · · Score: 1

      I really had no idea you were being sarcastic... I'll let it go this time. :-)

    14. Re:Rude? by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      Amusingly, Microsoft does donate to CMU as a marketing ploy, seperately. ;)

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
  91. Robin Hood! by grolschie · · Score: 1

    More like a genuine Robin Hood, robs from the rich^H^H^H^masses and gives to the poor^H^H^H^Horganization where prospective customers will be studying.

  92. Microsoft Skynet has become self-aware by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 2, Funny

    Skynet was after all created at CMU. Now Microsoft is giving money to CMU. Will Terminators have glowing blue eyes instead of glowing red eyes?

  93. you fucking idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cry me a goddamn river

    if you weren't such a blind american cow, you would have seen that bill g is investing in your ejewmacation.

    FUCK i hate it when people like you come nagging whenever somebody donates something "ohhh why not the poor blind children why not the poor ethiopians

    how much have you donated to ANYTHING lately?

  94. Oh come ON! by freedom_india · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Why can't you guys take it in good spirit???

    The Gates Foundation is administered by Belinda Gates. Bill.G does NOT have any voice over what she does.
    The Belinda gates Foundation has started many, many projects for AIDS in africa and India, projects which have nothihng to do with capturing market share, or Windows (tm). Hundreds of lives have been saved, thousands have benefitted through his fundings of their education, etc.

    Although it may be hard to digest for you Bill.G haters, his ruthlesness is only in his business and does NOT extent to real world. Show me one another who has donated and build so much for so many people WITHOUT crowing around !!!

    Do NOT judge a person for what he is, but judge him what he does.
    Dumbasses.

    --
    "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    1. Re:Oh come ON! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop trying to be so reasonable. You know not where you are.

    2. Re:Oh come ON! by javiercero · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A lot of drug king pins in Colombia do a helluva charitable work actually, some are almost revered as heros. If you ignore how they got the money to begin with, then yeah... they are great people. It is how they got the money they are using to do charitable work that is the issue.

    3. Re:Oh come ON! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why can't you guys take it in good spirit???
      The Gates Foundation is administered by Belinda Gates.

      I got your point. Belinda Gates is the one who did the deeds and she should be honored rather than her husband who doesn't care about good deeds but huge tax deductable donations.

      Then we should name the new building after Belinda Gates, the very person who extended her courtesy to build the building. I agree, she deserves that for her good spirits. How about "Belinda's Lil' Whorehouse"? Who's your daddy, huh?

    4. Re:Oh come ON! by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      We *are* judging him for what he does and has done. This isn't the catholic church here. You can't spend your life screwing people over, confess, do a few good deeds and expect the sun to shine out of your arse.

      It's like a king spending his 'working' years conquering and laying waste to the world to build his empire and then, in retirement building a few churches so as no to be remembered as 'King Bill, the utter shit'.

      Like another poster mentioned, gangsters have a long tradition of philanthropy. Look how many people expressed grief at the death of Carlos Medellin. Still plenty of Cockneys (and mockneys in Essex) thinking highly of the Krays.

      Bill Gates has no voice? This text taken from the foundation web site must be a mistake then.

      "Along with his wife and co-founder, Melinda, Bill Gates provides strategic direction for the foundation, advocates for its core issues, and reviews its major grants"

      By the way, it's 'Melinda Gates', not Belinda.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    5. Re:Oh come ON! by eludom · · Score: 1

      > Show me one another who has donated and build so
      > much for so many people WITHOUT crowing around !!!

      Oh, I don't know, maybe the guy that founded CMU:

      http://www.carnegie.org/

      ---eludom

    6. Re:Oh come ON! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Why can't you guys take it in good spirit???

      Didn't you see the jokes?

      The Belinda gates Foundation has started many, many projects for AIDS in africa and India, projects which have nothihng to do with capturing market share, or Windows (tm). Hundreds of lives have been saved, thousands have benefitted through his fundings of their education, etc.

      I listened to Gates talk once (PBS I think) about the work the foundation does. A focus area is preventable childhood diseases in the third world. What he doesn't consider is now that the lives of all these children have been saved, what kind of life are they going to lead? He doesn't talk about providing potable water for the millions of lives saved. Is it moral to save a life so it can suffer a more horrible death? Don't even think that I'm saying that those children shouldn't be saved. I'm saying that Bill's actions are at best short-sighted.

      his ruthlesness is only in his business and does NOT extent to real world.

      But what he does extends into the real world. He controls a company that has been found guilty of illegal actions. What he does well, is market (via any means) crappy software.

    7. Re:Oh come ON! by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      Point well taken

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
  95. Well of COURSE bright blue.... by reynolds_john · · Score: 2, Funny

    It represents the Blue Screen of Death.

  96. Every School Needs a Gates Building by ortcutt · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's about time that CMU got a Gates building. Stanford has had one for a while. It doesn't seem that the name is having any inappropriate effect on the students, faculty or administration here, though. The CS curriculum only has one Windows programming course (an elective) and most of the computers in the labs are either Macs or Suns. Even many of the staff use Macs here.

    1. Re:Every School Needs a Gates Building by 26199 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the William Gates Building at Cambridge University in the UK.

      Fortunately the effect there doesn't seem to have been disasterous, either... the top floor of the Gates building holds a large number of dual boot Windows/RedHat computers.

  97. A BAD JOKE.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft is an excellent way to do CS. You should be able to do things in theory but everything keeps crashing it's practically hopeless. =)

  98. Trouble Windows Girls by Alien54 · · Score: 1

    It could be worse. Here come the Trouble Windows girls

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  99. Re:And of course... MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MOD PARENT UP! He's right, /. is full of marketing parasites.

  100. Good works. by Cow007 · · Score: 1

    Ok, what we really need to do now is infect his daughter with HIV. I bet a cure would be found really fast then. I'm sure it would be some kind of patent encumbered and extremely expensive vaccine tho. (and he would make billions from it). (This could be funny or flamebait, I don't know which way it will go but it had to be said)

    --
    411 Y0UR 8453 4R3 8310NG 70 U5!! -NSA
    1. Re:Good works. by Cow007 · · Score: 1

      (by the way I AM just joking)

      --
      411 Y0UR 8453 4R3 8310NG 70 U5!! -NSA
  101. CMU profs? by upsidedown_duck · · Score: 1


    I wonder what professors will feel like teaching real Computer Science in a building named after Bill Gates. The irony probably casts a fog in the classrooms.

    --
    -- "Makes Little Debbie look like a pile of puke!" - Moe Szyslak
    1. Re:CMU profs? by buchalka · · Score: 1

      Happy to have the option of teaching even more kids?

      Happy to have a job?

      Happy to be working in new surroundings?

      Irony? What Irony?

      --
      Games Programmer And Designer
    2. Re:CMU profs? by cpghost · · Score: 1

      Didn't the inventor of Mach (a CMU professor, IIRC) got hired by Microsoft?

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
  102. And who here has never seen a kernel panic? by bratmobile · · Score: 1

    Who here has never seen a UNIX box panic? Or spontaneously reboot? Anyone who thinks that kernel faults are a unique feature of Windows doesn't know JACK SHIT about UNIX, or operating systems in general.

    Yet more proof that Slashdot is more about UNIX snobbery than anything else.

    1. Re:And who here has never seen a kernel panic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a difference between "No root device found. Kernel panic" and "STOP condition: Windows confused".

  103. we should raise matching funds by seringen · · Score: 1

    we should raise matching funds for cmu so we can add a word -- the "gates sucks computer center"

  104. To take the most reasonable outlook... by JavaRob · · Score: 1

    I have not checked this, but I suspect the charitable donations from every Linux distro CEO combined would fall well short of this.

    I'd say the best measure of the man's charity would be to figure out the percentage of his income that he gives to charitable causes. I don't want to knock the charity that BG has done, because it is clearly considerable... but it's not quite fair to say he's a better man for giving 1% of whatever billions than someone giving 20% of a few million (note: invented statistics).

    1. Re:To take the most reasonable outlook... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Reminds me of this story.

      That really reminds me, it's time for me to write that check.

      -cmh

    2. Re:To take the most reasonable outlook... by McBeer · · Score: 1

      His net worth usually rests in the 40-60 billion range and he has given away about 3 billion. This puts him at giving about 5% to 7.5% of his wealth away. This is much greater then the 0.1% some moron earlier credited him with. In fact it is a larger percentage then most americans. I would be willing to wager that Bill Gates gives away a larger percentage of his income then all the Linux distro CEOs averaged.

      --
      Hikery.net - The best hiking site ever. Made by yours truly.
  105. Re:Poor rich Bill by Catskul · · Score: 1

    Yes, I know I'm treating the US as a single group. See how it feels?

    ...you act as if that was something new.

    Ive been to many different countries esp in Europe. I was supprised at how often people would tell me how "Americans" think. Then I would have to point out that the United States is a very large country with many people with very strongly different opinions from each other. Funny enough when I ask them if they have ever been to the US or how many people they know from the US they hardly had anything to say.

    --

    Im not here now... Im out KILLING pepperoni
  106. Cancer? by mindaktiviti · · Score: 1

    Is he dying of cancer? They (read: the rich) tend to blow a few hundred million on things like this when they're getting older.

    It'd be cool if they used some of that money to fund public research for cures or something that would benefit all of mankind. That I would definitely applaud.

    1. Re:Cancer? by buchalka · · Score: 1

      start applauding

      Also learn to read there is a heap of posts on other stuff he is done that is worth applauding.

      --
      Games Programmer And Designer
    2. Re:Cancer? by mindaktiviti · · Score: 1

      Okay, I applaud him then. :) Good for him.

  107. Give the man a TAX break, you mean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much do you think he's saving by giving? I am sure he means well but it is also the smart thing to do. Not to mention that he gets to have his name in big bold letters everywhere for posterity (and not for posteriors like the silly benches).

  108. Painted bright blue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With restricted "students only" checkpoint access through the front and "everybody else" access through the doors in the back.

  109. not the first time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This isn't the first time Gates has donated money for a CS building. There is already a William Gates Computer Science building on the Stanford campus.

    By the way, don't worry: the Stanford students, despite mostly being pretty pro-business and/or business-savvy and thus (I would assume) less likely to have a moral problem with Bill Gates, still do fundamentally get it. In other words, the fact that the building is named Gates doesn't really influence their thinking. They haven't lost their grasp of what computer science is supposed to be about. By the way, Don Knuth's office is in that very Gates building, at least according to his web page.

  110. IBM by corian · · Score: 3, Informative

    Someone at Slashdot is very confused. IBM is "Big Blue", not Microsoft.

  111. So the, if Ellison dontated $30m... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Would he get to rename the center "Delphi Center for Ellisonian Computing Omniscience"?

    He's just crazy enough to try... go for it Larry!

    Then again I guess it's just cheaper to strafe the completed building with a MIG on opening day.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  112. Gates... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bill Gate's gave away 1 billion dollars in scholarships ($50 million per year for 20 years and it will only cost him 70% of that due to tax benifits), but decided not to give any of the money to whites or asians.

    He gave $555 million to fight aids worldwide, then invested $200 million in pharmacutical companies who are blocking low cost drugs with TRIPS to places like Africa.

    He talks about the gap between the rich and the poor when donating money while flagrently violating anti-trust laws making him richer.

    There are many more examples of this back and forth. Though since the other side goes unreported it allows him to push his image to a greater status.

  113. CMU B-School got $55mil last year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now we have a brand new business school (mainly full of geeks), and its called the Tepper School of Business. Unfortunately, unlike Gates, no one really knows who or what a Tepper is.

    (David Tepper graduated from the program, back when it was known as GSIA [grad school of industrial administration], made a killing in the markets, and kindly donated $55m last year)

  114. I hope they teach Java and linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man I would jump to that college if they taught java and linux . It seems to all matter to me.

  115. that is great but... by rubberbando · · Score: 1

    That is great that Bill donated that money and all. I just wonder why he doesn't just open his own schools. Aside from donating to universities, he throws all this money/computers at failing rundown schools. A lot of those schools should be rebuilt from the ground up with that money. Throwing a few new PCs in a school that's falling apart isn't going to help much. New schools need to be built altogether. Those kids need a nice new happy place to go, not some rat infested hole in the ground with a shiny PC in the corner which is probably the only thing keeping the classroom warm in the winter.

    "Will Code For Food!"-sign being held by a homeless techie standing on the corner.

    --
    DEAD DEAD DEAD DELETE ME
  116. A More Fitting Color Suggestion by bedouin · · Score: 1

    Some faculty have suggested that in acknowledgment of Mr. Gates' profound influence on the computer software industry, the building should be painted bright blue

    No more will my green sea go turn a deeper blue
    I could not foresee this thing happening to you
    If I look hard enough into the settin' sun
    My love will laugh with me before the mornin' comes

    I see a red door and I want it painted black
    No colors anymore I want them to turn black
    I see the girls walk by dressed in their summer clothes
    I have to turn my head until my darkness goes
    Hmm, hmm, hmm,...
    I wanna see it painted, painted black
    Black as night, black as coal
    I wanna see the sun blotted out from the sky
    I wanna see it painted, painted, painted, painted black
    Yeah!

  117. It looks like you're trolling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ___
    | |
    (*)(*) Would you like help?
    | | /
    || || * Search for duplicate articles
    ||__|| * Scan for bad grammar in TFA
    |____| * Use a cliche from saved templates

  118. obligatory Simpsons reference by berkut7 · · Score: 1

    from the Stonecutters episode:
    Homer assembles the crew to repaint an apartment building covered with graffiti. The superintendent walks out and kisses Homer. "It looks so much better...a beautiful sky blue," she admires as a helicopter crashes into it.

    from snpp.com

  119. 20 mil a Day eh? by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 1

    Yup - what a pain. According to this Bill is making roughy 14 million a day. and this says (as of this writing) that Bill is worth 60 Billion Dollars. Add to this Microsofts War Chest and we can geusstimate this to be about a total of 110 Billion dollars. At 20 million a day Bill and Microsquish could "only" keep it up for ~5500 days. Now doleing it out only on business days, taking your weekends off, but no real vacation, real this means that Bill could only do it for about 20 years, this is assuming of course that Bill and Microsquish never makes another dime.

    Bill was born in 1955, which when the well runs dry in 2024 he will 59 years old, not old, but hardly young anymore. So though it is a stretch, but I think it is possible to argue - that Bill could do this every day for the rest of his life.

    --
    Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
  120. Hammerschlag Hall destruction not worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Building the Gates CS Bldg as pictured will require tearing down CMU's best building, known as Hammerschlag Hall. The architect even put the bow of a ship on the back side of this true classic. I vote he put his building somewhere else.

    1. Re:Hammerschlag Hall destruction not worth it by pfriedma · · Score: 1

      You are looking at it wrong... It's going to be in back of Newel Simon hall, by Smith and Hamburg looks like It will replace OSC (thank good)

      --
      Mak'tal shree lok'tak mek'ta sa'tak Oz! - Daniel Jackson
  121. SMOOTCH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That loud sound you just heard was only one of the first in a series major ass kissing. Expect more to follow, folks.

    Context:
    There was a bit of a fracas at Harvard over whether the dumb terminals that had been donated by Gates and Ballmer and then prompty wiped of the weird Windows terminal software and replaced with Linux should be taken down when Ballmer was there for the official ceremony honoring him and the building (they were, I believe, but promptly reappeared within a few days afterwards).

  122. sponsor for each classroom by ArcticCelt · · Score: 3, Interesting
    In any case, as long as you have a shiny nice new building on Bill's dime, who gives a crap what it is called?

    In Montreal one of our finest Commerce Universities (HEC), when they built a complete new campus they decided to sponsor each classroom and put the name of the sponsor on the front door of each classroom. Its ok when your finance classroom is named after a bank, but one classroom was named after a chicken fast-food chain and their was a little bit less of glamour in the name of that class. :)

    Anyway they had an insanely great new campus for less money and who cares about the names?

    --

    Yahh, hiii haaaaa! -Major Kong, from Dr. Strangelove
    1. Re:sponsor for each classroom by Have+Blue · · Score: 2, Funny

      If the finance room was named after a bank, was the room named after fast food for liberal arts?

    2. Re:sponsor for each classroom by sharkey · · Score: 1

      No, it's the Windows computer lab.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  123. Unfortunately... by piecewise · · Score: 1

    It may take a number of years for the building to be completed. CMU will be rolling some of the building's features into already existing - though more poorly constructed - buildings.

    --
    The next comment I write will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
  124. Quick question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many billions of copies of a free software package will you have to sell to match Bills donation?

  125. What's $20m when you are worth $61 Billion by NicksMyName · · Score: 3, Informative
    According to This website's Wealth Clock Bill Gates is worth $61 Billion.

    Bill spending $20 million to get his name on a building is like someone with $500k of wealth spending $164.

    So next time you buy a Games Console for your nephew stick your name on it to show everyone how generous you've been.

    (And if it's an XBOX you're helping a very small amount to pay for another University building)

    1. Re:What's $20m when you are worth $61 Billion by dakkon1024 · · Score: 1

      500k of worth is what, a house, 2 cars and some stuff. Probably about my networth. I assure you that I don't have 164k to just kick around. I also assure you the 61 billion is not liquid.

    2. Re:What's $20m when you are worth $61 Billion by NicksMyName · · Score: 1
      Not $164,000 my friend.

      $164.00

      I am sure that the $61 Billion isn't sitting in his back pocket as that would weigh about 600 tons, but he's not hurting for that money.

  126. I wonder what KGB will do... by FleaPlus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I can't help but wonder what CMU's KGB organization will do when this building goes up. Basically, KGB is an on-campus group which engages in all sorts of random silliness, and describes itself as "an eccentric bunch of nerds, geeks, freaks, visionaries, outcasts and ne'er-do-wells, who plan on being on the right side of the guns when the Revolution comes."

    When Bill Gates came to visit campus earlier this year, the group painted the Fence (a frequently painted object in the middle of campus) bright blue in his honor. Also, during the Q&A session of the talk, KGB's president Ed asked the following:

    (transcribed from rough memory)
    Ed: Hello Bill. Have you ever used Linux?
    Bill: Yeah, a few times.
    Ed: Would you accept my gift of Linux? [holds up Linux CD]
    (chuckles and applause from audience)
    Bill: What's it worth? (grins)
    (more chuckles and applause from audience)
    Bill: Sure.
    (Ed gives Bill Linux CD)

    1. Re:I wonder what KGB will do... by pfriedma · · Score: 1

      ;-) Come to our meetings. Every Monday at 4:30 PM in Margaret Morrison A14

      --
      Mak'tal shree lok'tak mek'ta sa'tak Oz! - Daniel Jackson
    2. Re:I wonder what KGB will do... by bugg · · Score: 1

      There are too many CMU users here. Get back to misc.market, where I'm starting to get sad and lonely. -dp

      --
      -bugg
    3. Re:I wonder what KGB will do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why haven't you been posting lately? start a flamewar or something!!

    4. Re:I wonder what KGB will do... by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

      I'd love to, but I'm in California now...

      For whatever reason I never actually went to any KGB meetings, except for CTFWS (which I attended every semester). In retrospect I wish I did go to some meetings, as KGB seems to be a hella cool organization. In any case, about half of KGB seems to already know me. ;)

    5. Re:I wonder what KGB will do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, that night a large penguin appeared on the roof of the University Center, but it's not known if the KGB was involved in that. Unfortunately, it was taken down by morning; few people got to see it.

    6. Re:I wonder what KGB will do... by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

      When did that happen?

  127. It's posts like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or rather the replies to posts like this that show the true measure of Slashdot's maturity. That measure is "0".

    This wankfest known as "Slashdot" has gone on long enough, it serves no useful purpose whatsoever. Do the world a favor and pull the plug now. Linux can only be HELPED by doing so.

  128. What the hell? by DaFallus · · Score: 1

    What kind of a sick and twisted world are we living in when a man who does so many great things is villified because some people don't like his product? Microsoft aside, the man donates more money to charities than any one person that I can think of at the moment. Maybe some of you flamers should go out and donate billions of dollars to charities, maybe then you'll have some room to speak badly of Bill Gates, because after all, people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

    --
    No one cares what your captcha was

    Houston TX, USA
    1. Re:What the hell? by The+MESMERIC · · Score: 2, Insightful

      dont be naive or stupid
      I remember the time when Mr Billy was the only mega-corp billionaire that never donated a thing to charity.
      I kept repeating that again and again in forums. Then maybe their marketting team listened. And then started first donating Winblows "software" to school (great marketting).
      MS software is ludicrously expensive to purchase in the 3rd world. No wonder they are all going linux.
      And donating money to America's AIDS research. Wow how generous. AIDS treatment drugs are too ridiculously expensive to the 3rd world - despite being cheap to produce. Let's put a price on death shall we? So no wonder countries like Brazil are producing cheaper clones (instead of $99 per pill you have $0.99!).
      So don't be such down right thick, there are people who are rich and succesfull philantropist - who don't get villified as such.
      If someone is shady - the truth will show. Come on we live in the 21sth century. All false heroes will be exposed.

      For me naivity of people the worse evil of all. It made Hitler powerful.

    2. Re:What the hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s/don't like his product/don't like to be forced to use and/or pay for his product/g

  129. Let's just hope... by Xeth · · Score: 1

    That it turns out better than Stata (Which Gates also donated a large sum to help build)

    --
    If your theory is different from practice, then your theory is wrong.
  130. Ironically.. by KennethSundby · · Score: 0

    ..the fortune at the bottom of ./ right now says "The savior becomes the victim."

    That thing scares me sometimes..

    --
    -Kenneth Sundby-
  131. paint it black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to symbolize M$ contributions to computer science..

  132. Architecturally speaking... by r_j_prahad · · Score: 2, Funny

    There won't be a front entryway to the building. But there will be hundreds of back doors.

  133. EVIL CORPORATIONS OUT TO EAT CHILDREN by Shihar · · Score: 1

    I am utterly blown away by the people who are pissed that Bill gave away 20 million in exchange for having a building named after him. People are pissed because they see it as exchanging money to boost his public image. One question: Are you fucking joking me?

    Personally, I have absolutely no problem with corporations giving away money to good causes to boost there image. Would you feel better if they spent the money on TV advertising and pop up ads? If a company can make money, advertise, and do something good in the world all at the same time, why the fuck would you complain? Personally, I would like to see companies do MORE public relation boosting campaigns by giving away big sweaty wads of cash to worthy causes with no strings attached.

    I know Slashdot is hung up on the entire corporations are pure evil thing, but you need to get a hold of yourself and get things in perspective. If a big old evil corporation decides it wants to boost its image by saving whales, giving money to educators, and in general throwing money around worthy causes, that is a good thing.

    Finally, your points about Gate's evil plot for that science building really being an indoctrination center is down right foolish. He didn't give them 20 mil to teach Windows. In fact, I would say it is pretty damned safe to say that he gave the money away with no strings attached. Once the money is out of his hands it is gone forever. There is no leverage or threat he can use to take it back. They can fill the building up with Macs if they want and Bill can't do anything to stop them.

    So, I suggest getting off your high horse and taking a clue that corporations handing out money falls into the 'good thing' category, yes even when Slashdot's arch nemesis Bill Gates of the Evil Micro$oft (-- witty use of the $ sigh) Corporation is the one doing the giving.

    1. Re:EVIL CORPORATIONS OUT TO EAT CHILDREN by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      "In fact, I would say it is pretty damned safe to say that he gave the money away with no strings attached. Once the money is out of his hands it is gone forever. There is no leverage or threat he can use to take it back."

      Actually this isn't true. Say you pay the college a certain amount every month, and the money you give them has no strings attached, and they can do what they want with it.
      That still gives you strings and leverage, but if they do something you don't like, you can stop paying them.
      Makes sense?

    2. Re:EVIL CORPORATIONS OUT TO EAT CHILDREN by Shihar · · Score: 1

      That makes plenty of sense, provided you blatently ignore that they already have the money and can't take it back. Again, if corporations want to dump money into charity in an attempt to improve there image, stop boo-fucking-hooing it and realize that this is one marketing gimmick that is a good thing.

    3. Re:EVIL CORPORATIONS OUT TO EAT CHILDREN by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      You are not following properly.

      Say I give a school £1000 a month. Now I send my child there. I attach _no_ strings to the money that I give them. But, say there is the unspoken rule that if they do not give the child good grades, then I will stop paying them that money.

      Do you understand that even though I'm giving them money, and that each bit of money I give them has no strings attached, I still have leverage because of future payments.

      Follow?

  134. AIDS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone should really point out what an amazing thing we have done with AIDS.

    First, AIDS is an entirely preventable disease. Don't want it. Wear a condom. Simple answer, but it happens to be true.

    Second, and this is more important. In the short span of 20 years we have turns AIDS from a disease that kills to a chronic condition, like diabetes. It took us 6,000 years to beat syphilis (another condom solvable disease). It took us 20 years to effectively beat AIDS. Just wrap your mind around that.
    How few other diseases have we just decimated like that? Smallpox. Polio. But in such short a period of time.

    Now I know poor people still die of AIDS. They die of diabetes too. The fact that wealth buys longevity isn't something new. It is just kind of a fact of life, that only the simple or naïve complain about with seriousness. The Ancient Egyptians had the same "problem." Of course, you could just call it Darwinism.

    1. Re:AIDS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod that up. /MD

  135. Re:Poor rich Bill by javiercero · · Score: 1

    Oh Geee... like you don't have ignorant people in the US. At least those jackasses in Europe could single out your country in a map.

  136. obligatory simpsons... by isaac338 · · Score: 3, Funny

    4. All wall decorations are essential and directly integrated into the building and cannot be removed without destroying the entire structure

    "I wouldn't do that, that's a load bearing poster.."

  137. I once knew a camel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I once knew a camel
    who painted the enamel
    of all of his teeth bright blue.
    When I asked him, "Why?"
    His answer was "Why
    I'd tell you if only I knew."

    (Something I learned in grade school, but forgot the author's name. Perhaps a modern prophet predicting Perl on Windows?)

  138. why doesn't Gates give to by DeThude · · Score: 1
    CGNU!!!!!!

    then maybe I wouldn't smell so bad and my head wouldn't be on fire

  139. I tried to RTFA.... by B747SP · · Score: 1
    ... but they lost me at the part where it said "You will need Windows Media Player 9 to view...".

    Sorry pal, I don't need no stinkin' DRM infested bloatware on any account, much less to read about Gates grandstanding again.

    --
    I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
  140. Not Wiping Out Malaria by DoubleReed · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you read the link you put there, he has given a bunch of money to RESEARCH towards a malaria vaccine.
    Just to point out wiping out Malaria would be HUGE HUGE, every anthro professor I've had who did work in S America had it.
    So just ya, Gates has wiped out Malaria as much as Reeve has wiped out paralysis.

  141. Just wait for SCO to get into this... by xenobyte · · Score: 2, Funny

    They'll buy an old building already on campus, slap a bit of paint and window dressing on it, then fence it in with a high electric fence and charge a massive fee just to look at the building (let alone using it). Then they proceed to send a bill to all the people using all the other buildings, claiming they own the concept of a building and that their buildings are based on methods found in SCO's building...

    Sure, SCO's building and all the other buildings are based on far older principles and methods, but still they insist on owning the concepts because they were in the building they bought and thus it is theirs forever.....

    --
    "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
  142. That's nothin'. by Geekwad · · Score: 1

    Tom Siebel gave my school (UIUC) THIRTY million for a new building

    --

    - http://pakman.sytes.net/
  143. Actually Bill Gates didn't donate the most ... by jstockdale · · Score: 1

    One of the HP founders did. Memory escapes me as to whether it was Hewlett or Packard, but one of the two donated significantly more than Gates.

    -S ...

    --
    **AA: a bunch of mindless jerks who'll be the first against the wall when the revolution comes
  144. you want crazy.. you GOT crazy by Suchetha · · Score: 2, Informative

    this article on autoweek from a little over a year ago (almost to the day) talks about how bill gates and other rich folkses fought to get the porsche 959 made street legal. obviously this would have cost a tad more than a bunch of segways

    Suchetha

    --

    learn from yesterday, plan for tomorrow, party tonight
    or one out of three ain't bad
  145. Re:Poor rich Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least those jackasses in Europe could single out your country in a map.

    Most people know where China and Australia are too. They are all kind of hard to miss.

  146. you from canadia eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2024 - 1955 = 59? Your mathematical prowess is staggering.

  147. My first postive thing on BG on /. by Qbertino · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I actually like his new haircut. Now if only he would finally notice that he can't beat OSS and therefore join the bandwagon, so that I need not talk my mouth fuzzy with convincing my customers to use Linux I'd be cool with the man.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  148. wait a minute... by commodoresloat · · Score: 1
    I never gave a second thought to the names on the buildings at my university

    how'd you find your way around?

    1. Re:wait a minute... by TheCage · · Score: 1

      how'd you find your way around?

      he didn't go to class, silly.

  149. All is fair in love and war... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You make it sound as if Bill Gates intentionally went out of his way to make Kildall's life miserable. It just happened that their businesses were competing against each other.

    1. Re:All is fair in love and war... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We all know Gates can't compete.

    2. Re:All is fair in love and war... by Dirtside · · Score: 1
      You make it sound as if Bill Gates intentionally went out of his way to make Kildall's life miserable.
      Did you actually read my post? The very first sentence was:
      Not that this is what happened with Gates and Kildall,
      I was attacking the idea that someone cannot be at all responsible for someone else's suicide; I said (nor implied) nothing about whether Bill Gates was specifically responsible for Kildall's suicide. (I didn't even know who Kildall was until after I posted and went and looked it up.)

      It's possible that Gates was partially responsible, but the facts I can find are scant; I don't have enough information to say whether Gates was at all responsible for Kildall's death. The links I found didn't even suggest that Kildall committed suicide (both Wikipedia and another page mention that he fell off a ladder), so I'm not even sure where the suicide idea comes from.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  150. "Carnegie"? Check this out... by nusratt · · Score: 1

    "By the time he's dead, there will be so many buildings with his name on them..."

    And he'll STILL be behind THIS guy.

  151. Not to be left out ... by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    Who did you think the "M" stood for? Mother Teresa?

  152. Bill Gates Center for Computer Science? by cpghost · · Score: 1

    Some other oxymorons:

    • Bin Laden Center for Humane Politics
    • George W. Bush Center for Brightness
    • Michael Moore Center for Ethical Journalism
    • ... add your own favorite here ...
    --
    cpghost at Cordula's Web.
  153. Open Source Projects in CMU by libcrypto · · Score: 1

    Will microsoft has a say on the open source research projects going on in CMU now? CMU-SNMP, CMUSpinx are the two which turned up on a google search.

    Oh, I am sure there wont be overt pressure.. but surly this gives lot of clout to Microsoft in influencing the powers that be in CMU.

  154. sponsoring good, influence bad by PerlDudeXL · · Score: 1

    I really like the idea of alumni or other rich persons sponsoring universities or museums as long as they don't take too much influence on the issues being taught.

    I would fear that a 'Gates Center for Computer Science' would mean a typical Microsoft-monoculture.

    Using the latest development stuff by M$ and all that. Bad Thing.

  155. best laugh i've had in a day or more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Some faculty have suggested that in acknowledgment of Mr. Gates' profound influence on the computer software industry, the building should be painted bright blue."

  156. Computer Science Industry by BarryNorton · · Score: 1
    Some faculty have suggested that in acknowledgment of Mr. Gates' profound influence on the computer software industry, the building should be painted bright blue.
    I'm sorry, but that's an oxymoron. Gates has had a major influence on the Software Industry and is trying to have an (indirect) influence on Computer Science (quite separately) by sponsoring research in such places as CMU and Cambridge...
  157. Theory VS Practice by KidSock · · Score: 1

    ...because CS shouldn't be about practical implementations, but rather theoretical concepts...

    This is exactly the opposite of what I beleive. We desperately need more education in "practical implementations". One of the biggest problems with software today is that very very few people know how to actually produce it and a fraction of those are given the latitute to deliver it. What good is theory when our applications are riddled with race conditions and yet people are debating how the buttons look. There needs to be much much more work regaring practical applications of computer science. In particular our general method of developing software is horrible. At least all of the methods that I have been witness to are absolutely pathetic. They should be talking about state machines, data structures, and algorithms, and not degenerate use-case analysis that some clueless MBA created with MS Project.

    1. Re:Theory VS Practice by I_Love_Pocky! · · Score: 1

      Umm... I don't think you have any idea what you are talking about. Almost all of the things that you suggested students should be learning about are related to theory (state machines, data structures, and algorithms). Use-case analysis is related to software engineering, which is exactally what I want to see left out of a cs ciriculum (as it is only related to practical implemenations).

      What good is theory when our applications are riddled with race conditions and yet people are debating how the buttons look.

      HCI (Human Computer Interaction), which is where button style would be discussed, is another part of Software Engineering that has nothing to do with CS.

      The funny thing is that the things you are pointing out as being worthless are exactally the sorts of things that corporations are pushing CS departments to teach to undergrads.

      Don't get me wrong, software engineering has its place, but it shouldn't be forced down the throats of every CS student, because believe it or not, not every CS student is studying CS to be a software developer. Though, according to you those software engineering topics are unrelated to quality software development anyway (something I always suspected).

  158. I love the irony... by Fallen+Andy · · Score: 1

    Particularly since the more famous pieces of software
    from CMU (esp festival/flite stuff) are mostly developed on Linux.

    It would be even better if Linus got truly rich and
    they named a better building just opposite "The Linus
    Torvalds Medical Center".

    (Hey, all of those XP addicts will need it)

  159. Snarky ass. by shy · · Score: 1

    Yeah, we all hate BSOD, and most of us hate windows, blah blah blah. When a guy gives 20 million dollars, could you cut him a break?

    Christ.

    --
    ---- keep it simple.
  160. Re:Microsoft at CMU ++ MOD THE ABOVE UP++ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    At last, somone with a brain and intact moral centre posting in this topic.

    The American religion is ca$h, and it is sickening and revolting to see how many people say "If you pay for it your neame goes there". None of them understand merit, none of them understand what bestowing an honor means - they are base, money worshipping people, and it is this same ideology that fueles the illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq.

    It is really disheartening to read those words from people who are otherwise capabable of understanding things that are very complex. It implies that no matter how smart you are, you can still be as thick as shit when it comes to ethics. This is not right, since ethics are built on logical constructs, so geeks on the whole should really be more ethical than ordinary folk.

    Turns out they are just as dumb.

  161. Licensing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will per seat licensing apply to this building?

  162. Don't forget the Windows UI by pixelfreak · · Score: 1

    There's blue everywhere. And the default XP theme looks like it's designed for a preschooler.

    Longhorn doesn't look much better. A shiny blue turd, is still a turd.

    With their huge coffers, can't Microsoft hire good UI designers? Or perhaps they wouldn't know good design if it hit them over the head?

    1. Re:Don't forget the Windows UI by LuxFX · · Score: 1

      With their huge coffers, can't Microsoft hire good UI designers?

      I'm not a fan of the XP theme myself, but I can't fault Microsoft for that. Their designers, after all, have the incredibly huge responsibility of designing an interface suitable for all ages, all types, all purposes, all experience levels, and all tastes. They needed an interface that was equally suitable for being run on a pre-teens computer and an architectural firm's computer. That's no small task.

      I'm sure the inevitable direction of this discussion leads to comparison with the OSX gui. Well, it's no comparison. Macs have, what, 2% market share? And most of them are fanatics, or graphic designers. Not nearly as difficult a range to design for.

      --
      Punctanym: alternate spelling of words using punctuation or numerals in place of some or all of its letters; see 'leet'
  163. Re:Poor rich Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've found more ignorant people in USA than in Europe and those ignorant people I've seen in Europe is not that stupid as their yankie counterparts.

    Well, doing a "Jay walking" in Europe wouldnt be as much fun since you wouldnt hear people say that it was "George Hitler" that was the bad guy in WWII.

  164. MS changing the culture by ajkst1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't think this donation will change the culture towards Microsoft at CMU at all. As has already been mentioned, there are a TON of CMU grads that work at Microsoft. CMU grads know Microsoft wants them and many of them do go to work for them. Avie Tevanian, CTO for Apple, is a CMU grad and has done great things with them. CMU is a Linux and open source hotbed. "The Microsoft Way" is the last thing many of them want to learn. This [apple.com, QTVR required] is an example of why CMU isn't going to all of sudden jump to "The Microsoft Way." They have a significant interest in UNIX and Apple, and that's been there since 1983.

    I went to Carnegie Mellon 2 years ago for a seminar on integrating OS X into a college campus. I got to take a tour of the lab pictured in the link and imagined the 120 PCs and CRT monitors in there and it wasn't a pretty sight. The 15" iMacs they replaced them with are much nicer in terms of size and flow in the room, especially when the room is full. It's a nice donation by Bill, so don't take it as his way of converting CMU to Microsoft. Of all the schools in the world, CMU would probably be one of the last to go.

  165. In later editions by Julian+Morrison · · Score: 1

    After having had the building knocked over flat twice, they'll retrofit a giant chicken-wire mesh cage, enclosing the building on all 4 sides and above, to keep out that pesky woodpecker.

  166. I correct myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    s/suicide/death/

    I even knew that. Damn you for making me think it.

  167. Cambridge, not Massachusetts by tezza · · Score: 2, Interesting
    In Cambridge they have a William H Gates Building.

    I have a mate doing his PhD in Comp. Sci up there, and he says a lot of the staff in there are militant Linux advocates. They relish the irony.

    --
    [% slash_sig_val.text %]
  168. He'll Get It Back.... by geordie_loz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Most of the money will go on the Windows licenses, so Microsoft will get the money back soon enough.

    This sort of circular stuff could be a good way to launder money ;).

  169. I'm assuming its a matching fund by Phelan · · Score: 1

    Big donars do it all the time so they aren't the only ones responsible for a campus and keep alumni involvement up. My Alma Mater raised 30million for a science building that way, $15 million came from the family the building is now named after. And their donation actually was $1 for every $1 donated by other individuals.

    --
    "Nimis exaltatus rex sedet in vertice - caveat ruinam!"
  170. Gates is raising the new generation by otisg · · Score: 1

    I think we should watch out for Gates invest in facilities (and other things) for increasingly younger generations. If you think about it, this could give him access to the minds of the future at an early age, where his influence can be the greatest. One he has this access he can turn a large percentage of the new generation into Microsoft drones (not employees - users). Gates know first hand what it means to have access to the masses (Windows desktop). Think about it and monitor where this is going.

    --
    Simpy
    1. Re:Gates is raising the new generation by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      One he has this access he can turn a large percentage of the new generation into Microsoft drones
      Jesus H Christ, just how big is this university? Unless you mean a "large percentage" of, say, the population of San Marino or The Pitcairn Islands.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  171. personally by floydman · · Score: 1

    I dont care who pays, what is it called, or how much does it cost, as long as someone is gonna get a decent education(even if it is MS based). Some ppl cannot afford to go to college to have decent jobs, things like this at least give them the slightest chance.

    Now that doesnt mean i am a Gates fan, nor a MS fan for that matter, but you have to balance the matters here and diffrentiate between him personally, and his job.

    If this is a troll then prove it.

    --
    The lunatic is in my head
  172. More pictures by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

    I found another great picture, of the roof of Wean Hall at CMU:

    BILL PH34RZ WEAN!!1!1

    Also, here's some better pics of the front and back of the blue fence of death:
    http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~akj/stuff/gates/blue_scre en_fence_front_small.jpg
    http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~akj/stuff/gates/blue_scre en_fence_back_small.jpg

  173. tough crowd... by zxflash · · Score: 1

    he gives 20 big ones away you say "he should have given 50"...
    he pledges most of his wealth to charity you say "ya but he earned it by (choose)[stealing, monopolizing, kiling baby seals]
    there are folks on /. who would castigate bill if he gave a kidney away...

    you should be a little more mature and try and seperate the man drom the corporation (m$)...
    so he wants his name on the building. wouldn't you? if it was only about having his name on something he could use his massive amounts of cash to have his name engraved on the moon...

    --

    All the torrents you could want.
  174. Eh? by kahei · · Score: 1


    The first link I got for Gary Kildall was this:

    http://www.maxframe.com/EUBANKS.HTM

    While it's an interesting tale, the blame for Kildall's failure to become a billionaire (as opposed to a mere multimillionaire) seems to rest pretty squarely on himself. He had a company. It made some money but was too slow in bringing out new products, because Gary was more interested in his own life than in making a business empire. So the clients switched to QDOS. Duh. Later he died of something or other 'during a night out'.

    Only a true Slashdottva could turn that into 'Bill Gates bears principal responsibility for the suicide of Gary Kildall'. FFS, get a grip.

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
  175. huh?! by Simon · · Score: 2, Insightful
    2. Gates and Microsoft, as much as people don't want to admit, drove the PC into the mainstream use for end-user consumers. Microsoft followed others such as DEC, Sun, etc., and had something that ran on hardware of the day for academic and commercial reasons, and then took a leap (albeit Apple was already there in small representation, and Xerox just didn't market their workstation as effectively as MS did), and voila! They made a new market of people who found the usefulness of a computer at home.
    oh! come on! I'm not quite 30 and I can still remember the 80s well enough to know that that is not how it happened. IBM, the clone manufacturers and applications like Lotus 1-2-3 and WordPerfect are what drove the success of the PC in the 80s, it certainly wasn't MSDOS. Even in the 90s we see that WWW, email and the internet pushed the PC even further into the mainstream. It is IBM's orignal screw up with the licensing of MSDOS that bootstrapped Microsoft's rise to where it is now.

    --
    Simon

    1. Re:huh?! by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      to think Lotus and Wordperfect drove the success is misguided at best. As the parent poster suggested it was MSDOS and its ease of use and simple design that allowed programs like Lotus and wordperfect to work. but the real driver is and always has been the mass of games that came with the advent of DOS. even now it is what makes windows so huge.

    2. Re:huh?! by curious.corn · · Score: 1

      Games driving PC sales? Oh man, you must be high on drugs! MS-DOS games were utter & total crap, mosly quick 'n dirty ports of the real thing released on the Home Computing Platform of the time: the Commodore Amiga. And don't let me on MS-DOS design simplicity; the 640KB limit quickly became a pain in the ass for everybody that used an i386. The Amiga was a Mac look-alike with unsurpassable A/V chipset; hadn't it been for Commodore's unpardonable management we would worship AmigaOS X rather than Apple OS X and Microsoft would still be yet-another-vendor selling a cute interoperable Office suite and VB for office automation, probably competing with today's incarnation of WordsWorth and the like... Get your facts straight, Mr. Thurrot.

      --
      Mi domando chi à il mandante di tutte le cazzate che faccio - Altan
    3. Re:huh?! by Simon · · Score: 2, Interesting
      to think Lotus and Wordperfect drove the success is misguided at best. As the parent poster suggested it was MSDOS and its ease of use and simple design that allowed programs like Lotus and wordperfect to work

      :-) MSDOS didn't have any "ease of use". Programs like Lotus and WordPerfect were loaded into memory by MSDOS after which point they received little support from MSDOS as an operating system, especially in comparision to the OSes at the time such as AmigaOS and the Mac. "simple design"!? MSDOS was/is a mess.

      As for PCs as a gaming platform. The PC was always seen and marketed as the "serious business computer" in the 80s. DOS games were absolute crap in comparision to the competion then. It wasn't until the early 90s that the PC started to emerge as the primary home gaming platform.

      --
      Simon

    4. Re:huh?! by DrLex · · Score: 1

      As the parent poster suggested it was MSDOS and its ease of use

      Oh yes, the ease of using MS-DOS. For many people, using MS-DOS meant copying cryptic commands from a magical piece of paper, once written by the computer nerd next door, in order to start their favourite game or word processor. If something unusual happened, like 'Reading error. Abort, retry, fail?', or simply the vanishing of the Magic Paper or it becoming unreadable due to spilled coffee, it was total panic and the only rescue was a phone call to the same computer nerd next door...

    5. Re:huh?! by iMaple · · Score: 1

      MS-DOS games were utter & total crap
      You know you are talking about Doom and Wolf3D here. (And lots of sports , racing , adventure games which I still like to play). Sure they arent any thing compared to the new games but please dont call them crap, dude. Though of course I agree that Games drving PC sales seems to be farfetched (though I got my first PC for games)

    6. Re:huh?! by Simon · · Score: 1
      MS-DOS games were utter & total crap

      You know you are talking about Doom and Wolf3D here. (And lots of sports , racing , adventure games which I still like to play). Sure they arent any thing compared to the new games but please dont call them crap, dude.

      Actually we are not talking about Doom. We are talking pre-Doom, 80s and early 90s. (Yes, time and games did exist before Doom).

      Castle Wolfenstein was one of the first games that showed the PC doing something (textured 3D) which hadn't already been done on the other computer systems at the time. It was the start of the PC as a gaming platform. (3D gfx cards and modular/upgradable nature of the PC being key here. Other systems like the Amiga couldn't evolve their gfx hardware fast enough).

      --
      Simon

    7. Re:huh?! by iMaple · · Score: 1

      Actually we are not talking about Doom. We are talking pre-Doom, 80s and early 90s. (Yes, time and games did exist before Doom). :) I agree bu MSDOS existed with Doom and my point was just that MSDOS games werent necessarily crap. Castle Wolfenstein was one of the first games that showed the PC doing something (textured 3D) which hadn't already been done on the other computer systems at the time. It was the start of the PC as a gaming platform. (3D gfx cards and modular/upgradable nature of the PC being key here.
      I dont know if I am misinterpreting what u said but if u mean Wolf needed 3d gfx cards you are way off. Wolf, Doom (and I believe Doom2) ran strictly on CPU power, no 3d cards reqd.

    8. Re:huh?! by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      :-) MSDOS didn't have any "ease of use". Programs like Lotus and WordPerfect were loaded into memory by MSDOS after which point they received little support from MSDOS as an operating system, especially in comparision to the OSes at the time such as AmigaOS and the Mac. "simple design"!? MSDOS was/is a mess.

      Welcome to Mars. Watch that first step: it's a Doozie.

      DOS had significant ease of use when it was introduced. You could just type the name of an application and off it would go. None of commodore's half-dozen loader commands, none of Apple DOS's run or brun. Want to start an application straight from disk? At the time, DOS was the only OS which allowed a disc to straight boot the machine other than the now-forgotten Smoke Signal; other OSes always booted straight to ROM.

      Moreover, MSDOS was extremely powerful compared to userland OSes of its day. It took a lot of mechanisms from the then unheard of research OS "unix," such as pipes, background processes (ham handedly implemented as TSRs) and device drivers. Did any of the competition in userland of the day have these things? No!

      Little support from MSDOS as an operating system? Rubbish. You had devices implemented as named ports (com1:, lpt1:, con:, et cetera,) you had advanced console control (color, cursors, character attributes; text-mode device control,) you had allocators which allowed low-grade concurrency (TSRs and other background mechanisms, and later memory managers like EMM386 which were for their day absolutely cutting edge,) and so on. As DOS progressed, it came to have total device abstraction - remember their three disk compressors? No, you probably only remember the one they stole from Stac, if any at all. DOS was able to provide isolated environments - remember DPMI? No, you probably don't.

      Macs didn't show up for almost six years after DOS was new; Amigas for almost five. You've got your history all wrong. That's a little like saying "Jet planes efficient? Rubbish! Scramjets are far better!," making it obvious that you've never even heard of propeller planes, much less used one. God forbid someone tell you that propeller planes (Smoke Signal, OS9, Hydra) were also complex and powerful in their day, too; there are older things. Wonder what happens when someone tells you about the computer's counterparts to Icarus.

      DOS games were absolute crap in comparision to the competion then.

      Horseshit. The only competition DOS ever had for gaming were console systems. The time frame, so that you don't complain about how crap they were, makes their competition the 2600. Suddenly, those DOS games don't look so bad anymore. King's quest, leisure suit larry, lightspeed and hyperspeed, civilization, railroad tycoon, sim city, syndicate, and for you new kids that don't know shit about old gaming, Quake, DOOM, Wolfenstein, Duke Nukem, Pirates!, they're all DOS games. The last time Apple was king of the games pile was with the Apple ][, with stuff like Hard Hat Harry, Doctor Robot and Hovertank!.

      DOS games were and are great. Of all the legacy platforms I play, the only one that even gives DOS a run for its money is classic NES.

      It wasn't until the early 90s that the PC started to emerge as the primary home gaming platform.

      The accepted breakpoint was when EA bought Bill Budge's Pinball Construction Set from the Commodore 64 and ported it to PC, then refused to port it off of the PC because it wasn't profitable. That would be 1984 or so, if I remember correctly.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
  176. Stop Ragging on Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please, stop ragging on Bill Gates. The guy and his wife have done more to stamp out malaria than most countries, ours included. The guy is brilliant, and yes he's a damn good businessman. Jealousy is not becoming people. I admire the man and his generousity. Let's leave it at that. And yes I am wearing my asbestos underwear!

  177. Gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The .edu.au I work at kisses Bill Gates ass and he hasn't made any donations.

  178. more appropriate by flacco · · Score: 1

    i think baboon's-ass red would be a more appropriate color.

    --
    pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
  179. Modded +5 informative for not getting the joke? by michaeldot · · Score: 1

    From the think-about-it-dept.

    Plug different devices into Windows often enough and you'll see the reference for yourself. However, the BSOD is sort of a well known reference to Bill's OS, so it's a good color scheme for his building too.

    Anyway, I thought the jokes about leaving the building via the doors marked Entry, or that the building's offices cost extra, that 640 stairs ought to be enough for anyone, and that the building will look like what Apple had 5 years ago jokes were funnier!

  180. Damn! by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

    I knew I should have forwarded that chain letter.

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    1. Re:Damn! by potnoodle · · Score: 0

      Eh ?!? Moderator on crack alert !!!

  181. Apple ][ and VisiCalc by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 2, Insightful
    If anything, Gates drove a company that...
    Bill Gates certainly has a large fan base among some subcultures, and has rightly earned a reputation as a clever (and perhaps unscrupulous) business man. However, let's not get into creating revisionist versions of history.

    Apple ][ plus VisiCalc and, later, IBM plus Lotus 1-2-3 got microcomputers onto every desktop.

    Personally I would find it appropriate for a business school to have a Gates building, but as much damage as Bill has done to the entire computing industry and even computing science, I'd have to say the name of the building is entirely inappropriate. He and his company have caused (and are still causing) far too much damage to computer science and to the economy.

    Better to name it after someone or something else. What's next the Osama Bin Laden building for Womens Studies?

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
    1. Re:Apple ][ and VisiCalc by Kethinov · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Nobody realizes how much damage MS has done to the computer science industry. All they see is a wildly successful company. Since greed and great wealth is glorious, Gates is worshipped as a hero. Now there's a sociological concept that I hope dies out in the next few generations.

      --
      You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    2. Re:Apple ][ and VisiCalc by Edie+O'Teditor · · Score: 0
      Since greed and great wealth is glorious, Gates is worshipped as a hero.
      There's also a point of view that wealth is automatically bad...
      Now there's a sociological concept that I hope dies out in the next few generations.
      ... and that one went out with the Berlin Wall.
      --
      If X is the new Y, and Y is "X is the new Y", solve for X.
    3. Re:Apple ][ and VisiCalc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I couldn't agree more

    4. Re:Apple ][ and VisiCalc by Kethinov · · Score: 1

      The Slashdot community understands that and maybe your friends and family understand that, but you'd be surprised how many people in this world really think Gates is a hero of capitalist America who provides a service no one else could have done. There are a LOT of people who REALLY think that.

      --
      You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
  182. Great news for FOSS by flibberdi · · Score: 1

    Isn't this great news for FOSS??

    I wish there was some kind of study showing the importance of unis in the FOSS world, a LOT of the software I use was made or started in
    one uni or the other (most the rest is/was made by folks working for commersial sw companies, and a small part was made by folks working as paperboys).

    Thank you sir Bill Gates!

    :)

  183. Andrew WAS completely mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CMU was/is a Macintosh university! I wonder how Apple is taking this? Well, I guess, prior to OS X, they had pleanty of other types of servers there, but most students were using Macs. The User Guide for Andrew, their campus network, was printed in the style of the Macintosh literature, that stretched Garamond font (I know... I type set it for a McGraw-Hill affiliate). Well, there is still lots of Mac stuff there:
    http://www.google.com/u/cmu?sitesearch=cmu.edu&q=m acintosh&x=45&y=12

    1. Re:Andrew WAS completely mac by pfriedma · · Score: 1

      We are? AFAIK there are the Haberman clusters (mac) and the CFA graphics clusters (mac/pc)..and uh... ? CMU was mostly UNIX (solaris, irix, etc), and is now moving to the trend of Linux and Windows. When the Haberman cluster was built in Wean Hall, it was a big deal that they got shiny iMACs to replace the unix machines that were there.

      --
      Mak'tal shree lok'tak mek'ta sa'tak Oz! - Daniel Jackson
  184. 1/5th responsibility == glory? by krel · · Score: 1

    Bill's only putting up 20$ million where the new "Gates" building is going to cost 100$million. Is that all it takes to get your name on a building?

    --
    karma: ouch!
  185. Re:windows by potnoodle · · Score: 0

    I'd vomit on you if it would help to put out the flames. But I wouldn't go so far as piss on you though.

  186. Re:Building Colour by potnoodle · · Score: 0

    No blue, with a big error message on the front of the building in large letters above the doors :)

  187. Would hate to be the plumber by potnoodle · · Score: 0

    in that building !!! eeeewwwwwwwwww

  188. CS is not science by dankelley · · Score: 0, Troll
    OK, let's move along from the name of the donor to the name of the department. This building is not for "Computer Science", since "Science" on a university campus is shorthand for Natural Science, i.e. the study of nature. (By the same token, Mathematics is not Natural Science and therefore in many universities it is place in an Arts faculty.)

    At least to my ear, the "Science" in "Computer Science" sounds a lot like the "Science" in "Social Science", or "Library Science", or "Marketing Science", or, moving from the campus to the commercial world, "Shampoo Science". The intention seems to be more to inflate than to describe -- to distinguish the work of folks who think logically and who are not afraid of technology from the work of the chin-strokers and pipe-puffers on the other end of campus, where they dress better and mainly in black.

    Better names for CS might be "Information Technology", or perhaps "Computing Studies". Even "Computing" is catchy and rings true..

    1. Re:CS is not science by jlanthripp · · Score: 1
      According to Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary, the closest thing to your definition of "science" is definition number 3:
      Especially, such knowledge when it relates to the physical world and its phenomena, the nature, constitution, and forces of matter, the qualities and functions of living tissues, etc.; -- called also natural science, and physical science.
      Definitions 1 and 2 are:
      Knowledge; knowledge of principles and causes; ascertained truth of facts.
      and
      Accumulated and established knowledge, which has been systematized and formulated with reference to the discovery of general truths or the operation of general laws; knowledge classified and made available in work, life, or the search for truth; comprehensive, profound, or philosophical knowledge.
      I'd guess that Computer Science is a valid term for the area of study it is used to describe. By the same token, Mathematics are a science, though I'd be hesitant to use the term "Social Science" or "Marketing Science." The areas of study you describe are what I would call by one of the two terms mentioned in Webster's - Natural Science or Physical Science.

      In any case, you and I are both being pedantic and we should really get out more :-P

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, & Firearms" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    2. Re:CS is not science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like the way you think...
      Its been bugging me for a long time that some universities have started touting their Computer Science Departments as "Software Engineering," and moved them into the Engineering Department. This is asinine. What do they think they are engineering... electron structures? magnetic fields? Computer Science is a subset of Mathematics!! If I was an engineer it would p!ss me off even more. But I'm not... I am a Linguistical Engineer :P I think you see my point: the word "engineering" becomes weaker everytime it is misused to make some other study sound more important. Furthermore, computer programming IS NOT Computer Science. You don't even need a computer to do good work in Computer Science. If you are at a university studying Computer Science, and all they seem to be doing is forcing programming languages down your throat... COMPLAIN. Make them teach what they advertised.

  189. So finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... Gates is getting involved with computer science after all those years of having to mess around on the trial-and-error level.

    Certainly not too much money for this.

    Great day for him, I suppose.

  190. Stone Cutters Club by pt99par · · Score: 1

    Hmm... Bright Blue building.. Watch out birds and choppers. Doh..

  191. Re:Poor rich Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hahahaha!
    Hitler wasn't the bad one. It was Henry Stalin.

  192. that's a ridiculous comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bill Gates and Columbian drug lords? please, give me a break, the tension of your thin moral line is killing me.

    1. Re:that's a ridiculous comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      microsoft sales tactics are the same as the drug pushers though so there is a link :)

  193. Heard of George Soros ? by anti-NAT · · Score: 1

    Soros's Deep Pockets vs. Bush

    NEW YORK -- George Soros, one of the world's richest men, has given away nearly $5 billion to promote democracy in the former Soviet bloc, Africa and Asia. Now he has a new project: defeating President Bush.

    I don't exactly know how much BG has given away, although I'd doubt it would be significantly above and beyond what George Soros has given away. BG isn't the only billionair giving away large amounts of his money.

    --
    The Internet's nature is peer to peer - 20050301_cs_profs.pdf
  194. I think this is a bad idea by CrazyJim0 · · Score: 1

    This building will just hire lawyers to tear down the other buildings on the university.

    www.geocities.com/James_Sager_PA

  195. can you f***ing read a***ole? by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    The majority of the funds came from a group of Japanese companies.

    Christ on a broken crutch, it's right there man.

    I don't buy the suicide bit either, but that doesn't resolve Gates of his being a complete ass.

    Marked as "foe" until you prove you have your ADHD under control enough that you can read an entire post(not skim!) before responding.

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
  196. CMU and MSFT's relationship by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Microsoft recruits like mad at CMU (esp. for Microsoft Research) because it's a good computer science school, not because they have special ties.

    It's very true that the university administration (not the School of Computer Science administration) is big on having buddies at large businesses, at having ins in the defense world, stuff like that, to help suck in grant money.

    However, the School of Computer Science is quite different. SCS is very critical of Microsoft. I don't think there is a single SCS course taught on Windows or using any Microsoft products (there are a few taught using Mathematica, but generally one uses either Solaris or GNU tools, and not even proprietary products). I remember one CMU philosophy course (a Humanities and Social Science class, not even SCS) where the professor handed out a document in .DOC format and the next day came in, apologized to everyone due to all the complaints, and asked whether we'd prefer PDF, PS, RTF, etc instead. You could theoretically get by using Microsoft Office, I guess, but there's quite a bit of pressure to use LaTeX in SCS. My databases class focused on Postgres, because you could recode parts of the scheduler (unlike, say, MS SQL), which was important for teaching DBMS internal theory. I remember when one SCS professor, Gregory Kesden (damn cool guy, BTW), asked some Microsoft guy to come give a lecture on the .NET framework in a university lecture hall, and got absolutely chewed out by the SCS administration for doing so, who viewed this as promoting a Microsoft product.

    If CMU has ties to any company, it's Apple. Apple's OS X kernel was written at CMU, CMU uses a ton of Macs -- probably about as many Windows machines, down from a majority of Macs at one point, and Apple people come to speak more often than Microsoft people.

    CMU maintains their own Linux distribution (Andrew Linux) and develops and has developed a phenomenal amount of open source software, including major packages. CMU's done a lot of the OSS SNMP code out there, AFS is from CMU, festival (the OSS speech synth package) is from Alan Black at CMU, Coda is from CMU, and so forth.

    CMU has an absolutely ridiculous degree of interaction with Slashdot just because of all the *IX geeks at CMU. I attended CMU's SCS and knew a single Windows guy -- did work on Windows, liked Windows, etc. Not common.

    I agree that the SCS people probably won't like having a building on campus called the Bill Gates building -- Bill Gates is not particularly well-known for advancing the field of computer science, and a number of people feel that he's tended to hold it back in the name of profit. The university people, though, who are responsible for finding offices and lecture rooms for the SCS people, are probably thrilled.

    Of all the major CS universities that I visited when deciding on a university, CMU was the *only* done that didn't rattle off a list of "the places that you can get a job" or push their job-placement services. The assumption was that you were coming because you liked/were interested in research, not because you wanted job placement. That was a major turn-on for me.

    Point is, CMU isn't likely to be much of an MS school any time soon.

  197. DeG-Spot by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 1

    What, Michael Hall, the DeGroot Research Institute and the hot new recreational area, the G Spot?

    You seem to be confusing DeG-Spot, the Michael Hall, with TheG-Spot, the Ernst Gräfenberg Recreational Area. Please never do that. The latter was named after a guy who has invented the Command Line Interface Terminal, known as the only intuitive interface, after which it's all learned.

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
    1. Re:DeG-Spot by phiwum · · Score: 1

      The Command Line Interface Terminal? Intuitive?

      You're fooling yourself. Or your partners are fooling you.

      --
      Phiwum's law: anyone that names an obvious law after himself and then puts it in his own sig is just pathetic.
  198. The William Gates building by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

    The William Gates building will be the new Fence.

    (For non-CMUites: the Fence is a fence that is regularly painted by CMU students with all kinds of political, social, and technical comments. Before the original wooden Fence collapsed and was replaced with a metal fence, it was the most heavily painted structure in the world, and today most of the mass of the Fence is still many layers of paint.)

    The Fence got painted last time Gates came to CMU, and given the CMU propensity to write on everything (Archie's Leap, for instance), I expect that it will become a new favorite forum.

  199. Re:Poor rich Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Yes, I know I'm treating the US as a single group.

    No, you're confusing the country with its inhabitants, spaztard.

  200. ORKIN is a better venue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given the army of bugs in Windows, ORKIN donations and ingratiations are more appropriate.

  201. A simple question by shmergin · · Score: 1

    To all the guys (and girls) bagging him because he is "only" giving such a small amount of his fortune, i ask you this (and answer truthfully): How much of _YOUR_ paycheck has gone to charity this year?

    ...

    yeah, thought so.

  202. I'm late to the party... by ClippyHater · · Score: 1

    but it has to be said:

    In Soviet Russia, the Bill Gates building crashes You!

  203. Something interesting about CMU door locks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    That, and the building won't have any locks.

    It will probably be locked like all the other buildings. About 5 years ago CMU installed electronic door locks on most of its buildings. The kind with the big magnets that keep the door shut. There is a motion sensor on the inside that releases the door when someone approaches the exit.

    Now just outside many of these doors is a box full of copies of The Tartan, CMU's student newspaper. So what happens if you take a sheet of newspaper and shove it through the gap in between the double doors, right under the motion sensor? Ah hah....

  204. Paint the building blue by mikael · · Score: 1

    Some faculty have suggested that in acknowledgment of Mr. Gates' profound influence on the computer software industry, the building should be painted bright blue."

    But they failed to mention that the follow lines will be embossed in Silver using four foot high letters.
    This will be allow the message to be seen across the campus as well as from the air.

    A fatal exception 03 hase occurred at 00020:C000DEFE in VxD VMM(01) + 00010E36. The current application will be terminated.

    * Press any key to terminate the current application.
    * Press CTRL+ALT+DEL again to restart your computer. You will lose any unsaved information in all applications.

    Press any key to continue

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  205. Marked as "foe" until you prove ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As if anyone really cares about the lame ass friend/foe in /.
    What next? are you going to call him a "Doodie head"?

    You take yourself WAY too seriously.
    The Rest of the world does not!

  206. Hohum by BigBadBus · · Score: 1
    Surely only the windows will be painted blue? And even then, they'll only open once you leave and re-enter the building!

  207. f***ing moron by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    If I took myself seriously, I wouldn't be wasting my time posting on Slashdot. And I REALLY wouldn't waste my time responding to ACs.

    OTOH, my point still stands, and you can't knock it down by making fun of me, you ridiculous dipshit.

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
  208. Oh but it won't be all smiles and farts... by FatSean · · Score: 1

    Eventually there will be a schism as to which way the building is going to develop. Some will think there are excessive orniments and features that take away from the functionality. Others will mourn the fact that the Microsoft building has off-set it's doors so that access paths no longer reach it. Eventually the building will physicaly split in half but each half will still have to share things like plumbing and bathrooms.

    --
    Blar.
  209. More MS philanthropy by BigBadBus · · Score: 1
    Microsoft are promoting a new quit-smoking product. You buy a small box from a shop and then spend years downloading thousands of patches...

  210. Color scheme by bbzzdd · · Score: 1
    Some faculty have suggested that in acknowledgment of Mr. Gates' profound influence on the computer software industry, the building should be painted bright blue."

    Don't forget the HUGE puke-green doorbell!

  211. AIDS 'philantropy' == pumping own portfolio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Others have cited examples of Columbian and other drug lords. I'd be less cynical about ole Chairman Bill's so-called philanthropy if he hadn't first invested heavily in pharmaceuticals. This is a case of choosing the most expensive/least effective strategy to deal with AIDS just to pump his portfolio.

    Don't bend down.

  212. If people learned to see past..... by MagicBox · · Score: 1

    fanaticism, bias, grudge, hate...etc etc, they'll notice that the world is not such a bad place to live in. This deal is not such a bad deal.

    Free money?
    I will agree that, if a Colombian drug lord had made the contribution, then I'd say there is room for some of the hatred/criticism I read below, but that is not the case.

    Close minded?
    If we like to be called Open Source, then why the hell do we have such a *CLOSED* mind?

    Benefits
    When you receive your cheque either every week, or two, do you concentrate on who gave you the cheque, or *how big* the cheque was and how you're going to spend it?

    Reality
    My Unix geek boss, still thinks that WIndowsNT 4.0 is the latest OS from Microsoft, so he keeps repeating how full of holes that OS is. I asked him when the last time was that he read anything about MS technologies? None can *force* you into any platform anymore. It is the reality. It's the incentives that come with each platform that will finally make one prevalent over the other. The word SECURITY and the word *FREE* can only take you so far.
    The impact of such donation should overshadow the name of the donator and the controversy, not the other way around.
    Congrats Carnegie! Spend it well. Like it or not Gates is one of the largest (if not the largest) contributors to education. Indireclty that affects the new Open Source generation in a very positive way.

    --

    The phaomnneil pweor of the hmuan mnid. Fcuknig amzanig eh!
  213. Re:Rude? NOTE: you and Bill are not alike! by gosand · · Score: 1
    Who cares if he's really rich? If he gave away $20 million every day, he wouldn't be for very long, would he? No matter how you look at it, $20 million is a LOT of money.

    I ran the numbers, albeit a year or so ago. I compared Bill Gates to my net worth. Now I am not wealthy, but I am not poor. I have been working in the IT industry for 10 years, I have a house, 2 cars, and no real outstanding debt. I am doing OK.

    Bill Gates giving away $1,000,000 is the equivalent of me giving $5. And we both live in the same world, where a dollar has the same value for everyone. So he is not being generous. If I would give away 1/2 of my net worth, I would be in big trouble - he could give away 9/10 easily and still be able to survive. I applaud him for donating money, but let's not kid ourselves and pretend he is making any sacrifices. If he was a genuine philanthropist, he wouldn't have named his foundation after himself and his wife.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  214. gives his money away early and when needed by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Other computer deci-billionaires like Larry Ellison , Michael Dell, Paul Allen, Steve Balmer have barely given away their windfalls while Bill Gates has given away almost half of his to education and medicine.

    1. Re:gives his money away early and when needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm much more impressed with my neighbor. An elderly woman, on a $6000 a year pension, who gave $500 to Habitat for Humanity last month.
      Why isn't that news?

  215. ObNit: not named for Leland Stanford by edremy · · Score: 2, Informative
    It's named for Leland Stanford *Jr*, his son who died (of TB?) at a young age.

    Look at the seal sometime: it's Leland Stanford Junior University. As a Stanford grad school alum, I always get a kick out of that- I got my doctorate from a junior college!

    --
    "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
    1. Re:ObNit: not named for Leland Stanford by GileadGreene · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected. However, I think that my point remains the same - the naming had nothing to do with academic achievement, and everything to do with money.

  216. A quick analysis of msft contributions: by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    >>If anything, Gates drove a company that put computer science on the map.

    Okay, let's see just what msft invented for the PC:

    First PC: no
    First widely used PC: no
    Hardware: no - ibm
    16-bit OS: no - no msft bought it
    32-bit OS: no - no: x86 *way* late
    GUI: no - apple
    LAN: no - novell
    wordprocessor: no - wordstar(?)
    spreadsheet: no - visicalc
    database: no - dBase(?)
    email: no
    internet access: no

    Contrast this to Apple:

    First practical PC
    First practical GUI
    Ran the first practical application: visicalc
    First widely used 32-bit PC OS?

    BTW: I am no fan of apple, I use a PC with linux and win2k partitions. But I like to give credit where it's due.

    1. Re:A quick analysis of msft contributions: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever heard of this company called Xerox? You're giving Apple way too much credit here...

  217. Bullshit! by theolein · · Score: 1

    I don't mean to flamebait you, but really, just think about those amounts before you hail Bill's staggeringly big heart and love of humanity. As an example

    He spends $25 million on an AIDS vaccine initiative. In South Africa alone, there are between 5 to 12 million people with HIV. In South Africa alone. There are known, generic, safe drugs that can keep those people who have AIDS alive. The third world generic versions made in Brazil, Argentina, South Africa and India were under fire from the US government for "destroying IP" (where have we heard this disgusting fuckshit before? - hint:MS and SCO). The US government is lobbied heavily by the pharmaceutical industry. Guess how much your big hearted Bill Gates invested in that industry: $250 million.

    If that's philanthropy, then I'm fucking Jesus and I can turn shit into bread.

  218. Let's put this in perspective by metamatic · · Score: 1

    Bill Gates giving Stanford $20 million is like me giving them about $100, based on our relative riches. If I give Stanford $100, will they name a building after me?

    Furthermore, chances are Bill didn't actually give anything away. The mega-rich put a chunk of their capital into foundations, and fund their 'generous' 'charitable' donations out of the profit the foundations make by investing that cash. None of Bill's actual cash is given away, just the profit he makes lending it to people like us.

    Plus the guy's a crook who lied under oath in a court of law. We all saw the tapes of him lying outrageously. He escaped by buying off the Justice Department, funding Ashcroft's re-election campaign.

    I look forward to Stanford announcing the Ken Lay School of Business and the Harold Shipman Department of Medicine.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  219. IBM building? by WhitePanther5000 · · Score: 1

    If they paint it blue, that would just remind me of IBM (Big Blue). I'd have alot more respect for an IBM building than a Microsoft one.

  220. A geek's revenge by djbrums · · Score: 1

    There is a rumor that bill gates donated the money to stanford just so a professor who flunked him at Harvard would have to work in the "Bill Gates" building every day. I asked the professor in question, and he confirmed that he flunked him. Bill hasn't scheduled a one-on-one for me to confirm his side.

    If true, that would be a true geek's revenge!

    I just hope the building doesn't start shaking until everyone runs around and closes all open windows.

  221. Re:Poor rich Bill by lowe0 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but is hating them valid in the first place, or was it just inspired by jealousy?

    Especially when people hate software MS hasn't even finished yet... is it a rational response to a perceived flaw in the product, or just knee-jerk bashing?

  222. why was this article posted? by Gron-gron · · Score: 1

    I suspect this article was posted just to see how many funny comments can get modded up to 5. The fact that Bill donated to a school isn't significant, nor is the dollar amount.

    David Filo of Yahoo! and Jim Clark of Netscape each donated individual contributions of $30M each to Tulane's Engineering school to be used for engineering scholarships.

    That seems more worthy of mention in slashdot, as it means more educational opportunities for (possibly) future slashdotters.

  223. Water Proplems in Gates Building by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 2, Funny
    You guys/gals missed the obvious problem here. Certainly there will be tremendous water problems in this building.

    Several leaks will appear in the roof, which will require a never ending number of *patches*. However, these patches will then cause an ever increasing static load on the roof, requiring removal of certain Fixtures in the building. These fixtures in the building must be removed because the building can no longer *support* them.

    Next, due to all of the leaks and subsequent rise in relative humidity inside the building, mold will form at an astounding rate, spreading to other buildings. Then, one of the biology students in attemp to 'help', will introduce a mold *VIRUS* which will spread like wildfire to all of the *buildings* on campus

  224. As a CMU alumni I don't support this by Serveert · · Score: 1

    This is dealing with the devil. Money shouldn't always talk.

    --
    2 years and no mod points. Join reddit. Because openness is good.
    1. Re:As a CMU alumni I don't support this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're fired. -- Bill PS. Money isn't important so don't let unemployement get to ya.

  225. Re:In acknowledgment of Mr. Gates' profound influe by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

    it should have robust barriers to entry.

    Ehhhh, that sounds an awful lot like security to me. Would never happen.

  226. I wonder if they must use windows in the building? by Serveert · · Score: 1

    Given that CMU CS is a unix-only operation. Wouldn't it be ironic if the money was used on mostly unix not windows machines?

    --
    2 years and no mod points. Join reddit. Because openness is good.
  227. ..blue? by jonesboy_damnit · · Score: 1

    Yes, the Big Blue building - IBM would be pleased indeed! "You named a building after us? Why?" *chuckle*
    -Matt

  228. I wonder if there are any strings attached... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    For a LONG time I have been wanting this question answered, unequivocably:

    After he and his wife donate funds for construction or computers and software, do they CARE or look the other way if LINUX is put on those boxes or in those buildings?

    Is the question moot maybe because they carefully screen, select and hone those environments to make absolutely damned sure that there is next to NO chance of Linux or F/LOSS getting in?

    David Syes

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  229. Check your math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    administrations enjoy naming things after whoever foots the most of the bill, and in this case, it's Gates.

    $20 million is not "most of" the $50 million cost. Fair enough to name a building after the person who contributes 50% or more of the cost. But in this case, that's not Gates.

  230. Another noteworthy Gates Foundation gift by ArtStone · · Score: 1

    According to opensecrets.org, on 6/28/2004, the Gates Foundation gave $2,000 to the John Kerry presidential campaign.
    ($2000 is the federal limit)

    --
    Final 2006 "Proof of Global Warming" US Hurricane Count -> 0
  231. Nope - I don't buy that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does it have to have his name? I mean, doesn't that get terribly boring after a while?

    I would stash away any thought of benevolence here. There are plenty of causes that deserve help, but even UNICEF and Medicins sans Frontiere (apologies if I misspelled this) have to cough up for MS licenses and systems. Maybe that would be a worthy cause. To sponsor a Uni into enough goodwill to continue buying MS software ('coz he's been so good to us) is a deal I'd examine with a serious degree of caution.

    I think it's way, way, waaaay too soon to claim that this is all without self interest - that is not the Gates Modus Operandi.

    There's an applicable proverb:
    "forgive - but don't forget"

    A.nonymous.

  232. Three hands? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sir, I do believe you have too many hands involved in this discussion...