Slashdot Mirror


iPod Video Coming to a Car Near You

_am99_ writes "In the "one more thing" media event today, an iPod that can play Video was announced. The initial content seems to be music videos that can be purchased from the iTunes Music Store." In related news aquachannel writes "Apple has just updated their iPodYourCar page to include a slew of new car companies. This means that there'll be a lot of cars that you can buy off the showroom floor and use your iPod with your car - right off the floor and out of the box."

823 comments

  1. Finally... by rovingeyes · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This would be a big hit if they can stick to that price of $1.99 per video and have variety in the content provided. Already they have a winner with music videos and Pixar offerring six short films. MTV has turned in to a channel that has nothing to do with music. Also I don't have to put up with all the crappy vidoes with MTV stupid logos and artwork, assuming Apple is going to just give me a clean video. Along with that it'd be nice if they can provide other content like stand-up routines or I'd love if Jon Stewart could force comedy central to provide it's videos for video ipod.

    1. Re:Finally... by Golias · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Music videos are commercials for albums. Yawn.

      Being able to download TV shows is a much bigger deal, especially shows which I otherwise would not have free access to, such as the new Doctor Who episodes from the BBC.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    2. Re:Finally... by mysqlrocks · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Pixar is also making six short films available through the iTunes Music Store for the same $1.99 USD price.

      Yep, the $1.99 price point seems pretty nice. I think this is the beginning of the end for DVDs and services around DVDs (Blockbuster, NetFlix, etc). Putting Pixar content up there is a way to show the movie industry, "Hey, look what we can do here. Extremely low distribution costs, instant access for customers." Does anybody know if this video content is HD? If so, then the format wars for HD DVD will become meaningless pretty soon.

    3. Re:Finally... by squidsoup · · Score: 1
      If so, then the format wars for HD DVD will become meaningless pretty soon.

      Unless it's Apple's intention that you don't watch the content on your video iPod, this seems very highly unlikely. Also consider that the vast majority of people in the world simply do not have the bandwidth to download HD videos. This is undoubtedly the future of content distribution, but it is the distant future - only Japan and Korea really have the telecommunications infrastructure to support this.
    4. Re:Finally... by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Uh, is anyone kind of wondering why Slashdot didn't also mention iTunes 6 (five weeks after iTunes 5), Apple releasing a living room media center app called FrontRow with an iPod-like remote (which has 6 buttons compared to Microsoft Media Center's 40 buttons), a new iMac with built-in iSight cam, television shows for sale from ABC, etc.?

      Instead, it's kind of like..."Yeah, it looks like they released video-based iPods and some other stuff. Hey, here's stuff about cars. Ho-hum."

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    5. Re:Finally... by Qzukk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Music videos are commercials for albums

      These days thats all there is, since MTV doesn't have time for much else, but if you look back... I'd pay $2 for New Order's True Faith video (possibly the most bizarre one I've ever seen outside of Asia, and if you've got stranger I'll take recommendations) or for Alien Ant Farm's version of Smooth Criminal.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    6. Re:Finally... by calibanDNS · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Does anybody know if this video content is HD?
      According to Steve the video availabe through iTMS is all 320 x 240, which is the native resolution of the new iPod. Far from Hi-Def, but probably just right for the screen size that it's intended for.

      I doubt this will have much if any impact on the HD DVD format wars since most people won't see this as a device for watching video on their TV. Apple is marketing it is as a portable video device, and if it works then that's what it will work as. I expect in the next year or so that we'll see them introduce a product similar to AirTunes Express, but with video capabilities. That's what would really get me excited.

    7. Re:Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1


      Hardly. They're for the iPod.

      QVGA -- Quarter-VGA

      An image size of 320 x 240 pixels. This can refer to the size/resolution of a display, an image (file), or a camera.

      QVGA is a common size for high-resolution phone displays, and also for video captured by some high-end phones.

    8. Re:Finally... by sh00z · · Score: 1
      Does anybody know if this video content is HD?
      I can't believe that Apple's servers are bogged down due to the response, but it looks like they're using the HD codec (H.264) at half-VGA (320x240) resolution.
    9. Re:Finally... by tanguyr · · Score: 5, Informative

      Unless it's Apple's intention that you don't watch the content on your video iPod, this seems very highly unlikely.

      The apple store is selling an AV cable to "...connect your iPod to a television -- either directly or via the Universal Dock" - price: $19

      --
      #!/usr/bin/english
    10. Re:Finally... by w3weasel · · Score: 1, Informative
      from the apple store:
      H.264 video up to 768 kbps, 320 x 240, 30 frames per second; MPEG-4 video up to 2.5mbps, 480 x 480, 30 frames per second
      so, not true HD, but comperable to DVD
      --

      Just as irrigation is the lifeblood of the Southwest, lifeblood is the soup of cannibals. -- Jack Handy

    11. Re:Finally... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Er, the vast majority of people in the world don't have reliable sanitation. What's your point?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    12. Re:Finally... by mcc · · Score: 1

      The story was probably submitted before any of that stuff had become known to the public. If you were watching other sites during the press conference, the news about the iPod Video and its specs managed to get out and around the internet what must have been a good 20 minutes before Apple updated their website.

    13. Re:Finally... by mysqlrocks · · Score: 2, Informative

      only Japan and Korea really have the telecommunications infrastructure to support this.

      ...and Burlington, VT USA where I live. I am a beta tester for a municipal fiber optic service which will deliver high speed Internet access to every resident by 2007. As a beta tester I'm getting 5Mbps symmetrical service. This should be sufficient for HD content. People don't have faster service because there is little demand for faster service (people really just surf the web and maybe download a few songs). DSL and Cable are fast enough for most users Internet habits. There is a little demand for faster service because there is little out there that people would use this bandwidth for. All we need is a few places with decent bandwidth and a few services that can take advantage of these services and consumers will start to demand it. I, for one, say bring it on. Give me a super fast connection and services that take advantage of this bandwidth. Somebody needs to push the limits of the current technology. We can't just say, "downloading HD content won't work because nobody has the bandwidth for that" and then on the other hand Cable and DSL companies are saying, "why are we going to give our customers faster service, what the hell are they going to use it for?" Somebody needs to have some balls to throw a service out there to start showing people what's possible.

    14. Re:Finally... by interiot · · Score: 1

      The first people to get real information, strangely enough, was Stuff Magazine. Though, granted, iTunes was in Act 3, after all the other stuff.

    15. Re:Finally... by Bastian · · Score: 1, Troll

      Umm. . . just what exactly would be the point of HD video on a 2.5" screen with a resolution roughly equivalent to that of standard TV?

    16. Re:Finally... by aarku · · Score: 1

      Like regular HD... but the H stands for half I suppose. QVGA format, a measily 324x2480

    17. Re:Finally... by dr.badass · · Score: 3, Informative

      Apple releasing a living room media center app called FrontRow with an iPod-like remote (which has 6 buttons compared to Microsoft Media Center's 40 buttons)

      Bear in mind that the button comparison is a bit skewed, as Windows Media Center's remote includes functions for that archaic device: the television.

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
    18. Re:Finally... by ElGuapoGolf · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Hell... I'd pay 4.99 per episode for the new Doctor Who. Are you listening BBC/Apple?

    19. Re:Finally... by Golias · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When I'm on the road, whether for business or for tourism, I like to travel with a laptop, a case of DVD's, and an RF adapter for hacking my way into the TV sets typically found in hotel rooms.

      I might still travel with the laptop sometimes, but for 90% of the non-business trips I take, this new iPod looks like it could be the ideal replacement. The small size makes it easier to carry around, and much easier to watch in a coach seat on a plane. With the AV cable, I'll also be able to use it on hotel TV sets, though with a slightly lower resolution.

      Even with an external battery pack to extend run-time (such as the ones Belkin already sells for the current iPod), It will still occupy considerably less space than a carry-on bag than a laptop or portable DVD player, making it the perfect companion for a flight I'll be taking across the Pacific next Spring.

      I've been pretty happy with my trusty old 3G 20GB iPod so far, but this new one, combined with the ability to download video content, really has me thinking seriously about upgrading.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    20. Re:Finally... by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It should also be noted that Apple is a member of the Blu-ray group, so expect to see those drives in next year's Macs. I thought it was obvious six months ago that HD-DVD was dead in the water, and now with Dell, HP, a ton of movie studios, Apple, and others backing Blu-ray and H.264 over HD-DVD and VC-1 (WMV9), the writing's on the wall.

      Right now, Apple's videos are at 320x240, probably for bandwidth reasons as well as the fact that HD H.264 decoding requires a powerful machine that most don't have yet. But this is a start--Apple is quickly becoming the forerunner of "digital media" (finally, a use for that buzzword that actually applies).

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    21. Re:Finally... by aarku · · Score: 1

      -0 ... erk

    22. Re:Finally... by fupeg · · Score: 1

      Yeah no kidding. Personally the prospect of Front Row + TV Shows on iTunes seems a lot more interesting. Take a Mac Mini, add Front Row, hook it all up to your home theater, add a Bluetooth enabled keyboard+mouse... Go buy some TV shows from iTunes and watch them on your big screen telly.

    23. Re:Finally... by DirtJeans · · Score: 1

      Because it hooks up to TVs through an optional wire. I imagine that a lot of people will be using their video iPod to take shows and movies on vacation or to a friend's house to watch.

    24. Re:Finally... by anagama · · Score: 1

      That would make one hell of a widescreen format (at least if you rotate 90 deg).

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    25. Re:Finally... by DirtJeans · · Score: 1

      Not to mention an actual TV tuner.

    26. Re:Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Y'know, iTunes works on these other Apple products called "com-pu-ters". Apparently other companies make computers using something called "Win-dows" which can also use iTunes.

      Many of these computers have displays somewhat larger and higher resolution than even the new video iPod.

    27. Re:Finally... by Gogo0 · · Score: 1

      Mind that some DVDs beat this rather handily.

      One season of 24 is $45: That is $1.85 an episode, plus they are on a convenient medium in a sexy box and have extras.

      Of course this does not reflect the situation of all dvds... I dont think this will impact dvd sales signifigantly, at least not badly.
      I downloaded the entire season 3 of 24 and watched that in three sittings. Amazing show, I was shocked at how much I loved it. I then went to Amazon.com and purchased seasons 1-3 and preordered season 4 as I wait anxiously for season 5 to air.

      If people can download episodes and check them out quickly and easily, I can see many other people deciding that they are better off giving in and owning the product. This is no new idea, though. I've seen it posted on /. plenty of times, I am just offering an example of how it works, even on someone who uses Usenet so much that they pay for access to a quality provider.
      I think this will be a boon to dvds, not competition.

    28. Re:Finally... by beowulf2003 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention, the imac uses DDR2 and PCI-Express X800 ATI graphics with 128MB ... a significant update from before

    29. Re:Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's Right! I am OUTRAGED! We simply DO NOT get enough news about Apple!


      Damn you slashdot! Stop neglecting Apple! And I haven't even seen a google story all day, either. Stop it! Be redundant and post non-stories! Please, Apple! Need Apple!

    30. Re:Finally... by databyss · · Score: 3, Funny

      The Pacific is a biiiig ocean.

      I sure hope you like "That's So Raven".

      --
      Hmmm witty sig or funny sig? Maybe elitest techy sig!
    31. Re:Finally... by Ath · · Score: 1
      Let's do the math.

      Please note the assumption of 100 episodes of Dr. Who. While there may be numerous people on Slashdot who know the precise number, based on average human knowledge of actually relevant information, the number of 100 will be used to keep the math simple.

      (4.99 x 100 x 1) - (cost of production)= sum much less than 0

      Wow. How can BBC/Apple pass that little plum up?

    32. Re:Finally... by bnenning · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hell... I'd pay 4.99 per episode for the new Doctor Who

      Yeah, there are some great opportunities here. Imagine new Firefly episodes as iTunes exclusives. Being able to vote with our wallets instead of our Neilsen boxes can correct the fundamental flaws of existing ratings methods that force nearly everything to the lowest common denominator.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    33. Re:Finally... by TheGavster · · Score: 1

      $5 is probably a heck of a lot more than they make off the commercials one person sees during an episode ...

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    34. Re:Finally... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      not true HD, but comperable to DVD

      More like comparable to VCD and SVCD.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    35. Re:Finally... by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      In my area, Cox Cable is slowly rolling out 15Mbps/2Mbps for $55. Of course, my neighborhood is probably last on the list.

    36. Re:Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm surprised they didn't release a remote with only one button.

    37. Re:Finally... by Kjella · · Score: 2, Informative

      "H.264 video up to 768 kbps, 320 x 240, 30 frames per second; MPEG-4 video up to 2.5mbps, 480 x 480, 30 frames per second"

      so, not true HD, but comperable to DVD


      You are aware most DVDs are 720x480 or 720x576, right? I still don't quite get that one because H.264 = MPEG4 Level 10. Either way, it won't look different on your iPod. The first one is the same resolution as a CGA screen, hehe. It's got slightly more than the 16 colors I used to have though.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    38. Re:Finally... by ghukov · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I think this is the beginning of the end for DVDs and services around DVDs (Blockbuster, NetFlix, etc).
      Riiiiight. Not everyone is enraptured with iThings. I doubt people will toss out their dvd players and buy an iPod, video or not, since broadband is not available everywhere (yet). The overall cost associated w/ downloading content might be more than a lot of consumers are willing to pay to watch movies at home.

      --
      ...because Plutonians are teh suck
    39. Re:Finally... by Mercano · · Score: 1

      Well, then, happy rumors for you via The Inquirer.

      --
      #include <signature.h>
    40. Re:Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Based on the survey SF gate used to compare the cost per thousand impressions is $35 for the big stations in San Francisco. That is local not national of course, but it gets a figure. This equates to about $0.50-$0.60 per viewer in advertising revenues, butthe studio does not get the $5 from an iTunes download. Apple takes a cut, which is probably 30% or so if margins from music are any guide. At $2 per episode the tradeoff is considerably smaller and you loose the great scale that broadcast has (an extra viewer costs almost nothing to the station). National rate cards are likely to be higher (on a per viewer basis) than local SF, but I've no idea how much higher.

    41. Re:Finally... by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 1

      $5 is probably a heck of a lot more than they make off the commercials one person sees during an episode ...

      Yes. It quite probably is. ;-)

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
    42. Re:Finally... by squidsoup · · Score: 1

      I think it was pretty safe to assume there that I was talking about people with internet connections.

    43. Re:Finally... by squidsoup · · Score: 1

      Also consider that you need a relatively fast machine for HD playback at 30fps.. I would be very surprised if the iPod hardware is capable of this.

    44. Re:Finally... by SeattleGameboy · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah! I LOVE watching 320 by 240 images on my 100" projection screen!!! Who needs HDTV when you can download crap from i-Tunes??? Me? I will stick to my Windows Media Center with Fusion5 HDTV tuner watching 1920 by 1080 broadcast on my wall. Poor me...

    45. Re:Finally... by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      I don't know if he means he would pay that much for the old episodes, just the new ones.

      Then again....

    46. Re:Finally... by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      they're using the HD codec (H.264) at half-VGA (320x240) resolution

      Yes, H.264 is the codec most used for HD, but it was designed to cover the full spectrum of resolutions/bit rates. It was intended just as much for lower bit rate streamed video as for HD.

    47. Re:Finally... by stephentyrone · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "very surprised" doesn't begin to touch on it. even assuming 720p HD content, you're talking about moving a sustained 83Mb/sec of data over the bus (the decoded video), never mind the issue of needing to read *in* the compressed data, or the actual process of decoding it.

    48. Re:Finally... by XMyth · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe it's the new tallscreen format we've been hearing so many rumors about.

    49. Re:Finally... by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Hell... I'd pay 4.99 per episode for the new Doctor Who. Are you listening BBC/Apple?"

      Even better, why don't you (and others) tell Apple directly?

      http://www.apple.com/feedback/ipod.html

      It should be noted that the BBC allowed the new *Doctor Who* to be made available on Sony PSP UMD format - but only in Europe - just as with the DVD release.

      If you'd like to rattle up the online Doctor Who fanbase, join Outpost Gallifrey (www.gallifreyone.com) and share your opinion about watching NewWHO on your iPod.

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    50. Re:Finally... by CerebusUS · · Score: 1

      Music videos are commercials for albums. Yawn

      I think Apple agrees with you, as the videos are still able to be streamed over iTunes for free, but you can pay to watch them offline. not that I would, mind you.

      Also, the TV Shows page appears to not be working yet

    51. Re:Finally... by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 5, Informative
      "Right now, Apple's videos are at 320x240, probably for bandwidth reasons as well as the fact that HD H.264 decoding requires a powerful machine that most don't have yet."

      Au contraire, the new ipod specs say it supports:

      H.264 video: up to 768 Kbps, 320 x 240, 30 frames per sec., Baseline Profile up to Level 1.3 with AAC-LC up to 160 Kbps, 48 Khz, stereo audio in .m4v, .mp4 and .mov file formats
      MPEG-4 video: up to 2.5 mbps, 480 x 480, 30 frames per sec., Simple Profile with AAC-LC up to 160 Kbps, 48 Khz, stereo audio in .m4v, .mp4 and .mov file formats
      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    52. Re:Finally... by Petey_Alchemist · · Score: 1

      Yeah--I'd be a lot more psyched if South Park, the Simpsons, or any of those other shows were on this program.

      Truth be told, I'm kind of disapppointed. We have a video iPod without HD, no feature-film support (except for what you yourself can pirate/rip and convert to mpeg), and no video express station.

      We have Front Row, which is an awesome performance that is almost utterly useless if you can't hook it up to a T.V. Never mind that it's only available on these iMacs.

      We have a slightly upgraded iMac, in a line that certainly will falter in the face of the impending Intel switch.

      I mean...what did Apple really do here that was groundbreaking (other than, as was admirably noted elsewhere, convincing some television shows to go on the iTunes Music Store in a move that both A) paves the way for MPAA expansion and B) gives the RIAA a metaphorical kick in the nuts in terms of their price complaints)? We've all known that the technical ability to play video on an iPod was there. They could have done things much better, especially with FrontRow.

      And no video webcast? Even after the fact? I'm miffed.

      --Petey

    53. Re:Finally... by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      "Yeah, there are some great opportunities here. Imagine new Firefly episodes as iTunes exclusives. Being able to vote with our wallets instead of our Neilsen boxes can correct the fundamental flaws of existing ratings methods that force nearly everything to the lowest common denominator."

      Arguably, TiVo should have corrected the Nielsen deficiencies, but apparently too many owners allow their wives to record *Desperate Housewives* and thus the statistics confirm the B.S. that the Nielsens have spun for 50 years.

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    54. Re:Finally... by fromtheblueline · · Score: 1

      But the problem isn't just speed, it's also the cap put on the user by the ISP. What difference does it make if I can download 1080i video on demand if my ISP is going to charge me extensive overages for blowing my monthly cap, or worse yet, terminate my service?

      My cap is 50 gigs a month. If a DVD is 5 gigs, that gives me roughly 10 movies per month, not including any other internet activities.

    55. Re:Finally... by stephentyrone · · Score: 1

      that's 83MB/sec, not Mb. it's just not my day....

    56. Re:Finally... by Orgazmus · · Score: 1

      Really OT, and I guess i should have posted AC.
      Your sig. Why?
      Why in the world would you want to fight aging?
      There are 6 bn people in this world, 3 bn would be too many. And now you want us to live longer and overpopulate the world even more?

      --
      The system had the verbosity of HTML combined with all the readability of compiled assembly viewed as bitmap images
    57. Re:Finally... by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Tool's videos are pretty out there.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    58. Re:Finally... by Richthofen80 · · Score: 1

      Here's the real question: when I put a new DVD into my computer, will it rip the DVD into a format i can put on my ipod? that's what Itunes does with CDs currently. if so, I already have a library of stuff I can put on my ipod.

      --
      Reason, free market capitalism, and individualism
    59. Re:Finally... by Golias · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Please note the assumption of 100 episodes of Dr. Who. While there may be numerous people on Slashdot who know the precise number, based on average human knowledge of actually relevant information, the number of 100 will be used to keep the math simple.

      The number is 13 so far for the new series.

      13x5 = $65

      When you consider that ABC and Fox makes a fortune selling 26-episode boxed sets of their biggest shows on DVD for about $40 each, it's obvious that $65 for downloading low-res rips of a 13-episode series (Bring Your Own Storage Media), is downright extravagant. Even at $26 for the season, they would make a killing.

      Consider this: Let's say that, of the 300 Million people in America, only 0.1% would be willing to pay for Doctor Who episodes. That's still 300,000 x $26, which would be an extra $7,800,000.00 made on a show which has already paid for itself via distribution in other markets!

      Yeah... Just under 8 million dollars... hardly worth the trouble, eh?

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    60. Re:Finally... by peetola · · Score: 1
      Being able to vote with our wallets instead of our Neilsen boxes can correct the fundamental flaws of existing ratings methods
      Well, it shifts it to a different demographic, that of those who use iTunes.
    61. Re:Finally... by Steinfiend · · Score: 1

      To which my response would be, change ISP. I've not got too closely involved with the figures of capping because I've never had to, neither of my broadband ISPs have tried to stop me enjoying my available Bandwidth.

      I used to hit my BellSouth DSL account as hard as I could, maxing out the 1.5/256 service for probably 20 hours a day. Recently I've been beating my Comcast 6/384 into submission and they have yet to bat an eyelid.

      Maybe I'm lucky so far, but if they ever tell me to stop using the bandwidth they promised, I'll move my service somewhere else.

    62. Re:Finally... by theJML · · Score: 1

      Sweet! There are New Doctor Who Eps! I'd definately shell out a few bucks for those, especially if they're good quality!

      --
      -=JML=-
    63. Re:Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine new Firefly episodes as iTunes exclusives.

      They'd suck just the same, only now you'd have to pay for them? Help me see the upside here.

    64. Re:Finally... by RabidMoose · · Score: 1

      And all of that DRM and low resolution is why I'm still happy with my Gmini 402 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82 E16855501130
      Only 20gb, yes, but that's enough for me.
      Also works just like an external hard drive (can't pull mp3s off an ipod to a friend's computer)
      Also works as a USB host, so I can take the pictures off my camera's memory card on long stints away from a computer.
      Also plays ANY DivX/XviD encoded video, no matter the resolution. And included a cable to output to TV.
      Also has a microphone for recording voice (record lectures all the time this way)
      Also has an audio-in adapter (included) for recording from a source (ex: audio mixer)
      Also plays cellphone games.
      Oh, and it's cheaper.

    65. Re:Finally... by bnenning · · Score: 1

      Why in the world would you want to fight aging?

      Because it sucks. Even if it's "necessary" for us to die because of overpopulation concerns (which I reject entirely), the process of our bodies and often minds deteriorating over the course of our lives can and should be minimized.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    66. Re:Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The apple store is selling an AV cable to "...connect your iPod to a television

      That's a composite video cable (not S-video or component), which is common for VCRs and a poor choice for DVD players. A video source with 240 scan lines connected to a television with at least 480 scan lines via a VCR cable sounds like a bad idea to me.

    67. Re:Finally... by steve_bryan · · Score: 1

      from the apple store:

              H.264 video up to 768 kbps, 320 x 240, 30 frames per second; MPEG-4 video up to 2.5mbps, 480 x 480, 30 frames per second

      so, not true HD, but comperable to DVD


      How on earth do you reach that conclusion? The resolution for DVD is 720x480. The resolutions described are similar to what NTSC delivers although NTSC is not digital so comparisons are somewhat ambiguous. So the comment "not true HD" is an understatement.

      Is the screen on the video iPod really only 320x240? That is miserable compared with the Sony PSP which has 480x272 (roughly twice as many pixels). I guess that is a consequence of the PSP being significantly larger and less portable than the iPod. What about DRM? Would a Lost episode be playable on a PSP?

    68. Re:Finally... by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      Shush! Please don't upset the fanboys. Don't you know Steve Jobs invented everything ever?

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    69. Re:Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "With the AV cable, I'll also be able to use it on hotel TV sets, though with a slightly lower resolution."

      Half the resolution (240 scan lines) is "slightly" lower?

    70. Re:Finally... by cvas · · Score: 1

      What in the hell are you talking about?

      Yeah--I'd be a lot more psyched if South Park, the Simpsons, or any of those other shows were on this program.

      It's day one, give it time.

      Truth be told, I'm kind of disapppointed. We have a video iPod without HD, no feature-film support (except for what you yourself can pirate/rip and convert to mpeg), and no video express station.

      What the hell is feature film support? Were you expecting the iTMS to open with the Nextflix library available for download? And while HD is nice, I think you're missing the point. And getting upset at Apple because, I guess, you were expecting some huge revolution with VR and iPods you connect to your head, and instead you got their first effort at moving toward video.

      We have Front Row, which is an awesome performance that is almost utterly useless if you can't hook it up to a T.V. Never mind that it's only available on these iMacs.

      The iMacs have s-video and composite out, are you mad you can't use them with your coax only TV?

      We have a slightly upgraded iMac, in a line that certainly will falter in the face of the impending Intel switch.

      And BSD is dying. True story.

      I know I shouldn't have replied to you, but sometimes you just have to feed the trolls.

    71. Re:Finally... by rworne · · Score: 1

      That's a nice CGA screen you have. In graphics mode there may be 16 total colors, but you could only use 4 of them at a time. EGA did 16 out of 64 IIRC. EGA was great for playing Falcon AT on a 286. The first VGA screens I saw were 320x200 with 256 colors.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    72. Re:Finally... by Blue+Lozenge · · Score: 1

      If it wasn't written by someone in their spare time and given away under the GPL, why would slashdot care?

    73. Re:Finally... by CronoCloud · · Score: 1
      What about DRM? Would a Lost episode be playable on a PSP?


      I think the fairplay DRM would prevent it being played on a PSP even if the PSP could play the format.

      Video users encode themselves for their video iPod's might be a different story. If the iPod video format is MPEG4 SP or MPEG4 AVC then yes. Checking the apple website... Well what do you know, it IS MPEG4 SP.

    74. Re:Finally... by Total_Wimp · · Score: 1

      That's a composite video cable (not S-video or component), which is common for VCRs and a poor choice for DVD players. A video source with 240 scan lines connected to a television with at least 480 scan lines via a VCR cable sounds like a bad idea to me

      The specs say it does 480x480 output over the AV cable and the AV cable does support S-Video (It doesn't look like it does, but the specs say otherwise).

      Of course if your source material via iTunes is only 320x240 the higher specs won't do you much good, but assuming you can get source at 480x480 it'll be every bit as good as your DVR.

      TW

    75. Re:Finally... by Total_Wimp · · Score: 1

      Honest, not trying to start an argument here, but the screen real estate on a PSP is better for this, and it's actually cheaper. you can also play MP3s and even the odd video game or two.

      Yeah, the iPod is great. It has a huge hard drive and it's pretty darn small. I'm not knocking the iPod, but I'd much rather have a PSP on an airplane.

      TW

    76. Re:Finally... by Total_Wimp · · Score: 1

      More like comparable to VCD and SVCD

      THANK YOU!

      It was bad enough hearing everyone say 128kbps mp3s were "CD quality." I don't relish seeing the same crappy math with video.

      TW

    77. Re:Finally... by Watts+Martin · · Score: 1

      I see "Desperate Housewives" slagged a lot by people who I don't think have actually ever watched the show. Yes, it's a soap opera, but in terms of style, it's more like a black comedy version of "Twin Peaks" than it is like Dallas. I've only seen a few episodes, including the pilot--which is narrated by a woman who committed suicide--but they've been pretty damn well-written.

      If you've watched it and don't like it, fine, but if you're just looking at the name and mocking it... stop. :)

    78. Re:Finally... by needacoolnickname · · Score: 1

      I'm sure they are. Just not to you. Because they know that until they ask you to pay it you will say you will pay whatever. Then when they ask, "Oh, I'm sorry, I forgot my wallet. Let me just Bittorrent it instead.

    79. Re:Finally... by Petey_Alchemist · · Score: 1



      It's day one, give it time.

      True.

      What the hell is feature film support? Were you expecting the iTMS to open with the Nextflix library available for download?

      Yes.

      And while HD is nice, I think you're missing the point. And getting upset at Apple because, I guess, you were expecting some huge revolution with VR and iPods you connect to your head, and instead you got their first effort at moving toward video.

      I was expecting a bigger first movement, I suppose. I'm not upset, really--I'm surprised, and a little let down, but that's where hype gets you.

      The iMacs have s-video and composite out, are you mad you can't use them with your coax only TV?

      No. But you still have to move your mac around to your T.V. I guess I suppose that, given AirTunes, we'd see some sort of wacky way to hook it up wirelessly (or wired, with some sort of conversion box). Something to make it a little bit more useful. I dunno.

      And BSD is dying. True story.

      As someone who uses FreeBSD on his server...well, I'm not sure your ill-conceived insult applies to me.

      --Petey

    80. Re:Finally... by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      "If you've watched it and don't like it, fine, but if you're just looking at the name and mocking it... stop."

      No, I'm pointing out what I find unbelieveable that "Desperate Housewives" and "Lost" are the two most popular recorded programs according to the TiVo stats, which jives with the B.S. Nielsen statistics. I am dismayed at that. Very dismayed. I would've thought that supposedly less-popular programming would rank higher than what TiVo reports.

      At least Battlestar Galactica and Nip/Tuck have higher TiVo stats than the Nielsen basic cable stats report.

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    81. Re:Finally... by ElGuapoGolf · · Score: 1

      Hrm...

      I don't know about that. I've bought quite a few albums off iTunes. I'm one of the few people that I know of who paid for Opera. I might be in the minority, but I'd pay.

    82. Re:Finally... by needacoolnickname · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected.

      Doesn't/didn't iTunes have a request area? Maybe you can look for that and let them know. Just an idea.

    83. Re:Finally... by rogerallen · · Score: 1

      Sigh, wake me up when they get at least 640x480 video.

      When iTunes initially came out, the audio files you downloaded were *better* than what you could pirate off the net. This made iTunes a valuable product for those who preferred to pay the artists for their product. This is not the case with this new video feature, though.

      My prediction--paying $1.99 for lower-fidelity video than can be pirated off the net is just not going to be as successful.

      Hopefully, it is just the start...

    84. Re:Finally... by cvas · · Score: 1

      As someone who uses FreeBSD on his server...well, I'm not sure your ill-conceived insult applies to me.

      The comment was to illustrate that you were spreading FUD. You were making predictions based on having zero actual knowledge of the issue or at the very least providing zero facts to back up your statement. I used the BSD meme because I thought it would be easily recognizable, guess you missed the reference.

    85. Re:Finally... by fbg111 · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, there will be a couple of dupes soon with modified takes on the same story. One of those will probably cover this story from your suggested perspective.

      --
      Flying is easy, just throw yourself at the ground and miss. -Douglas Adams
    86. Re:Finally... by itcomesinwaves · · Score: 1

      but can you hook the PSP up to a TV? On an airplane I have my computer anyway. In hotel rooms, (and at home, for that matter) I like to be able to compute while I watch my digital media. With the new iPod I can do that.

    87. Re:Finally... by Philippe · · Score: 1

      "Right now, Apple's videos are at 320x240, probably for bandwidth reasons as well as the fact that HD H.264 decoding requires a powerful machine that most don't have yet."

      Au contraire, the new ipod specs say it supports [H.264]

      H.264 video: up to 768 Kbps, 320 x 240, 30 frames per sec., Baseline Profile up to Level 1.3 with AAC-LC up to 160 Kbps, 48


      He said HD H.264. Last I checked, this required significant horsepower to decode. More than a Mac Mini can handle, for sure.
    88. Re:Finally... by itcomesinwaves · · Score: 2, Informative

      what's so "au contraire" about that? Nothing you listed is anywhere near HD, which stars at 720x1,280 (720p). It doesn't even 480x852 (480p) which isn't technically HD (it's EDTV). I think the new iPod is cool, but don't be fooled into to thinking it does HD, it most definitely does not.

    89. Re:Finally... by (startx) · · Score: 1

      I hate to ruin your joke, but here's the Obligatory link to the apple article on creating your own ipod compatible video with quicktime. Now if I could just get my mythtv box to ouput compatible mp4 video with something like nuvexport.....

    90. Re:Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple, and others backing Blu-ray and H.264 over HD-DVD and VC-1 (WMV9), the writing's on the wall.

      My impression was that most of the Blu-Ray studio supporters were favoring backing VC-1 over H.264.

      Either way, Apple will have to licence the codec from Microsoft to sell either a Blu-Ray or a HDDVVD compliant machine, so both H.264 and VC-1 will co-exist for a long time. In other words, there is no codec battle - Both won.

    91. Re:Finally... by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

      Some thoughts:

      1) Apple acquires Tivo.
      2) Apple introduces set top box built on Tivo Technology.
      3) Ipod "docks" into said set top box (or computer).
      4) Ipod also "docks" into vehicle entertainment systems.
      5) Hella Profit!

      The iPod is the perfect device (as if we didn't know that already).

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    92. Re:Finally... by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      Well, so you're saying a TV requires 34 buttons to control it?

    93. Re:Finally... by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      "Also consider that the vast majority of people in the world simply do not have the bandwidth to download HD videos. This is undoubtedly the future of content distribution, but it is the distant future - only Japan and Korea really have the telecommunications infrastructure to support this."

      What are you even talking about? Comcast, in my area, offers HD video on demand. The infastructure is more than fast enough to stream HD videos to my set-top-box. Even a single 6MHz cable channel has 40 megabits of bandwidth. And, as for the uplink, Comcast's CRAN metro-area-network is 10Gb ethernet throughout.

      Comcast has more than enough bandwidth to offer HD video downloads. But why offer downloads when the connection is fast enough to stream in real-time? Video-on-demand is very here, very now. No PC required.

      By your assessment, the future is now. It's called cable.

    94. Re:Finally... by Golias · · Score: 1

      If being able to play PSP games was more important to me than being able to store a rather significant (up to 150 hours, depending on how much space is otherwise filled) video library, then I would probably make the same call.

      I'm not a huge fan of hand-held games though. Nothing against Sony's offering. Apart from some early technical glitches, it sounds like theirs is probably the best... but I'd rather just have a music/video library.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    95. Re:Finally... by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Informative

      You want to know just how powerful a machine you need to decode H.264? Here's an example: even my 2GHz iMac G5 drops frames on a DVD-quality (4:3) video.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    96. Re:Finally... by askegg · · Score: 1

      If I had some karma it would be yours.

      --
      I don't make predictions, and I never will.
    97. Re:Finally... by shmlco · · Score: 1

      Why does Apple need Tivo? Just add video in/out to a Mac mini and you're good to go. Add a video AirPort to the mix and you're in great shape. They already have Front Row and the remote control...

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    98. Re:Finally... by MegaFur · · Score: 1

      I think this is the beginning of the end for DVDs and services around DVDs (Blockbuster, NetFlix, etc).

      Funny, I thought Netflix was supposed to be the beginning of the end of Blockbuster. The Internet was the beginning of the end of newspapers, TV, radio--all other forms of content distribution. TV was the beginning of the end of radio, etc.

      In the long run, you could be right of course, but very frequently the road from "the beginning of the end" to the actual end is very, very long with many twists along the path. Very frequently, the previous technology does not ever truly die out, it just gets relegated to semi-obscurity.

      --
      Furry cows moo and decompress.
    99. Re:Finally... by corneliusagain · · Score: 1
      Next day shipping of a DVD beats the bandwidth of almost all broadband net connections right now.

      HD DVD is even bigger capacity. Although I agree high bandwidth is on the way and ultimately both CDs and DVDs may hit problems, that's a long way off, also given the trust issues with DRM, and the "buy it for my grandmother" simplicity of CD/DVD...

    100. Re:Finally... by drsquare · · Score: 1

      It's just a soap, but with higher production values and less interesting characters.

    101. Re:Finally... by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Yep, the $1.99 price point seems pretty nice. I think this is the beginning of the end for DVDs and services around DVDs

      What about those of us who don't want a computer next to the TV? What about those of us who don't want to lose all our programmes and films every time the computer breaks down? What about those of us who want to be able to lend DVDs to people without cracking DRM? What about those of us who don't want to hear a fan whirring when we're watching TV?

    102. Re:Finally... by drsquare · · Score: 1

      "Also consider that the vast majority of people in the world simply do not have the bandwidth to download HD videos. This is undoubtedly the future of content distribution, but it is the distant future - only Japan and Korea really have the telecommunications infrastructure to support this."

      What are you even talking about? Comcast, in my area, offers HD video on demand.


      I've highlighted some relevent points in your post. This insular, head-in-the-sand mentality HAS to end. Not everyone in the world is a techno-geek with broadband, mythtv and six computers all over the house. Some of us just want to put a DVD in and be done with it.

    103. Re:Finally... by earthstar · · Score: 1

      MTV has turned in to a channel that has nothing to do with music


      I thought that was the case with only MTV India here - so thats how MTV is ,the world over?
      I seriously dont understand how so many companies advertise in MTV , so much that its hard to catch any content....

      Do the advertisers think everyone will sit through the continuos ads & MTV graphics?
    104. Re:Finally... by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      The channel-buttons: 10
      Volume: 2
      Power: 1
      Teletext: 1
      Settings: 1
      Up/Down/Left/Right/Enter: 5
      Channel Up/Down: 2
      Switch between two channels: 1
      Input-selection: 1
      PIP on/off: 1
      Mute: 1

      That's already 26 buttons. My remote also has 4 buttons for shortcuts to certain teletext-pages and other things, pushing the total number to 30. I also have button to change the aspect-ration of the picture, pushing the number to 31. These are all from memory, it has some other buttons as well, but I don't remember what they did. The total number is about 34-36 I think. But then again, it can also be used as a DVD/VCR-remote.

      No, you do not need 34 buttons. If you really wanted to, you could survive with 13 (channel-buttons, power and sound up/down), or maybe even with just 5 (channel up/down, volume up/down and power). But you would be missing out on a lot of functionality.

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    105. Re:Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Replace DVD, dont think so. Imagine downloading 25 to 30 GB of HD quality movie from Apple Store, even if you have a good broadband connection is going to be very painful.

    106. Re:Finally... by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      and a couple of tuners - cable or freeview. and some scheduling software and epg. and enough DRM to keep the networks happy.
      don't get me wrong, i think apple would make a better HTPC than microsoft's, but a mac mini by itself isn't enough yet.
      they're missing the boat though in my opinion. fine for the new G5's but most HTPC needs don't need a monitor and so the mac mini would be perfect as a set top box.

    107. Re:Finally... by databyss · · Score: 1

      So I buy a $400 The iPod, and all I have to do to load my own movies is buy more apple software.

      AWESOME!

      --
      Hmmm witty sig or funny sig? Maybe elitest techy sig!
    108. Re:Finally... by agraupe · · Score: 1

      No. If your OS supports mplayer (I think it has a windows version), you're in luck: 3 (or 2, if you don't mind having your DVD drive running for longer than necessary) commands are all that's needed to rip a DVD to a full compressed format (support for DivX and XviD, which are MPEG4 compliant).

    109. Re:Finally... by Fahrvergnuugen · · Score: 1

      The only button on a remote you need for a Television is "Power"

      --
      Kiteboarding Gear Mention slashdot and get 10% off!
    110. Re:Finally... by mysqlrocks · · Score: 1

      Next day shipping of a DVD beats the bandwidth of almost all broadband net connections right now.

      You're not talking about NetFlix, are you? I use NetFlix and their turn around time lately has been horrible. They turn around DVDs in "1 to 3 days". If you get too many DVDs they make you wait longer. I'm not making this up, you can read it in their knowledge base. Also, they have practically no customer service. Just try talking to a human being when you have a problem - good luck.

    111. Re:Finally... by Squozen · · Score: 1

      Try setting the processor speed to Highest instead of Automatic. My 1.5Ghz PowerBook can handle H.264 at DVD resolution, no reason your iMac shouldn't.

    112. Re:Finally... by w3weasel · · Score: 1
      You seem very angry about the apple specifications that I posted. I assure you that apple meant you no personal harm when they designed this product.

      as for my saying that a 480x480 is comparable to DVD... please note the word comparable, which I elected to use rather than the phrase "as good as"

      Now, your standard low dollar crappy tube tv has 320 lines and is incapable of showing a DVD in full resolution anyway so my intent was to point out that the iPod is capable of "better than NTSC" just as DVD's are "better than NTSC"

      I would like to assure you that I meant you no personal harm when I expressed my opinion.

      --

      Just as irrigation is the lifeblood of the Southwest, lifeblood is the soup of cannibals. -- Jack Handy

    113. Re:Finally... by mysqlrocks · · Score: 1

      What about those of us who don't want a computer next to the TV?

      The video iPod is not a computer and it hooks up to your TV. I'm sure Apple will eventually come out with a Digital Video Player that is designed to look and feel more like a DVD player. People don't mind having a DVD player next to their TV, do they?

      What about those of us who don't want to lose all our programmes and films every time the computer breaks down?

      This is a good point. However, this is an issue with computers in general. People keep all sorts of important things on their computers. I'm sure losing their movie collection would be nothing compared to losing their accounting information. This is why people need to back up their computers. I had my mother to buy an external hard drive and I taught her how to use the backup software that comes with it. It's really not that hard - and it's going to get easier and more common as people rely on their computers more and more.

      What about those of us who want to be able to lend DVDs to people without cracking DRM?

      This is a good point as well. I think the convenience of being able to download movies would outweigh this problem. I, for one, prefer to download songs from iTunes. I simply don't buy CDs. You could bring your video iPod with you and hook it up to your friends TV.

      What about those of us who don't want to hear a fan whirring when we're watching TV?

      See the first answer. What is a DVD player? It's a computer. Is it loud? Nope. Anyways, my computer is in my living room and it's always on. I watch movies with the computer 6 feet from my head and I can't hear the fan.

    114. Re:Finally... by dr.badass · · Score: 1

      The only button on a remote you need for a Television is "Power"

      Indeed. Of course, that's not one of the six buttons on the Apple Remote.

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
    115. Re:Finally... by dr.badass · · Score: 1

      Well, so you're saying a TV requires 34 buttons to control it?

      If you're the kind of idiot that remote manufacturers think that you are, then yes. On the other hand, if you've at least mastered fire and are capable of producing crude stone tools, then you could probably manage with six buttons and some menus and modes. (That is, if Apple were to include a tuner, which in any event, I don't see as likely.)

      Really, I was trying to say that the "6 vs. 40" line isn't really a measure of complexity as it is redundancy. I heartily support the lack of buttons.

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
    116. Re:Finally... by steve_bryan · · Score: 1

      You seem very angry...

      You think that is anger? What I was expressing was disappointment. The numbers were being thrown around like a salesman at Best Buy which is OK if you are in that context but not appropriate to slashdot. For instance 480x480 doesn't correspond to any DTV format. A customary 480 x 720 would have to be shown with black bars above and below the actual picture or both sides would have to be cropped off.

      I think it may be a good business decision on Apple's part to offer a more portable device with lower resolution. I don't think stories should be made up that disguise that choice. It seems to provide NTSC level resolution which is probably fine for music videos, but it is only a fraction of the screen that Sony provides with the PSP.

    117. Re:Finally... by PickyH3D · · Score: 1
      But how much of that revenue do they keep in terms of profit in both cases.

      Manufacturing costs a certain amount, and the downloading means Apple gets a cut and the credit card companies get a cut. How much goes to the studio is a big deal with your math.

    118. Re:Finally... by Golias · · Score: 1

      But how much of that revenue do they keep in terms of profit in both cases.
      Manufacturing costs a certain amount


      Manufacturing... what? Exactly?

      Everything the BBC needs to make is already made. There's nothing to manufacture.

      Yes, Apple takes some, as do the credit card companies, but even if it's only a slice, it's a slice of a very big pie, with essentially no new costs taken on.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    119. Re:Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It should also be noted that Apple is a member of the Blu-ray group, so expect to see those drives in next year's Macs. I thought it was obvious six months ago that HD-DVD was dead in the water, and now with Dell, HP, a ton of movie studios, Apple, and others backing Blu-ray and H.264 over HD-DVD and VC-1 (WMV9), the writing's on the wall."

      Might want to get some updated information before you bother posting again.

    120. Re:Finally... by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      $1.99 for TinToy?

      That's a 2 minute animation made several years ago. It's been available online for free for years.

      The same for most of the other pixar animations.

      Look at it this way... buy 10 of those you have about 20 minutes viewing on a 320x240 screen, or a month of cable. Your choice.

    121. Re:Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a beta tester I'm getting 5Mbps symmetrical service. This should be sufficient for HD content.

      Or not, since OTA HDTV is 19Mb/s. 5 is pretty shitty quality for high rate HD plus the audio program.

    122. Re:Finally... by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      Volume: Remap to up/down
      Power: Remap to menu
      Teletext: Remap to menu
      Settings: Remap to menu
      Up/down: Present
      Channel Up/down: Remap to up/down
      Switch between two channels: Remap to left/right
      Input-selection: Remap to menu
      PIP on/off: Remap to menu
      Mute: Remap to menu

      Why does this work? Because a TV is fundamentally a display device. There is no need to have the UI on the remote; instead you can hit 'menu' and select from Settings, Mute, PIP, Input, Teletext, and Power. Additionally you would use the enter button to toggle between volume and channel.

      Of course it remains to be seen if Apple implements a TV tuner in a future release :)

    123. Re:Finally... by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      First of all, you remap both volume up/down and channel up/down to the up & down buttons at the same time. And you put awfully lot of functionality behind the Menu-button, making that functionlaity a lot more difficult to reach. And teletext in "Menu"? Teletext is usually used to quickly check few things, burying it under menus defeats that purpose.

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    124. Re:Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, the archos gmini which has been out for a year or two can also be hooked up to the tv. only difference is the archos handle full dvd res. And the new one has builtin camcorder.. And it has USB host. And games.. So what was that ipod good at again?

    125. Re:Finally... by nuckin+futs · · Score: 1

      remapping works sometimes,but not in this case. you'll end up pressing 1 button multiple times just to get the same function as a single button would do.
      e.g. change channel to chan 13: menu, then up & down key to select channel changing, then scroll until you get the right channel.
      on a 40 button remote, press 13 then enter (optional).
      doesn't the second solution sound much simpler?

    126. Re:Finally... by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      There is a balance between easy to use and easy to remember.

      40 buttons is pushing the hard to use because of too much complexity envelope
      5 buttons is pushing the hard to use because of too much complexity envelope

      Put it another way; what if every single word in the US language had it's own key on the keyboard: That would be akin to the solution of every function getting a single button!

      So you want to overload similar keys and keep a set of state buttons; my example was way too strict. You'd probably have a 'mode' button with 4 different modes for easy cycling (volume, channel, settings, input).

      The other thing needed is that the UI must be smart. Instead of 'channel 13' you'd have the display say 'ABC Network' or 'Disney Network' or 'Oxygen' or whatever. Don't forget this is how the iPod works; you have a scroll wheel that lets you scroll through your list quickly. There is no information with channel numbers, and there is no reason you shouldn't have visible meta-data.

      Otherwise your argument would also hold for MP3 players: Instead of playlists and albums and artists, just map all the albums to numbers 0-99, and then all the artists, their songs, the genres, etc.

      That doesn't work.

    127. Re:Finally... by Golias · · Score: 1
      Of course, the archos gmini which has been out for a year or two can also be hooked up to the tv. only difference is the archos handle full dvd res.

      Bullshit.

      The Gmini res is 220x176.

      That's considerably worse than the iPod.

      Also, a warning from the designtechnica review:
      "An important note about video support on the Gmini400 - it is only capable of playing MPEG 4 Simple Profile format. Other video file formats are not supported and will need to be converted first using translation software which is installable to your PC from the Gmini400 hard drive."


      Why do people keep insisting on trotting out that P.O.S. Archos whenever discussion of a video iPod comes up???

      The Archos Gmini 400:
      About the same price as the 30GB iPod
      Only a 20GB drive
      Slightly larger screen than the iPod, but at a lower res
      HALF the battery life
      Horse-shit interface
      No firewire compatibility
      No H.264
      No AAC
      No support for any lossless audio compression codec (FLAC, Apple Lossless, etc.)

      Furthermore... all the reviews I've seen report fuzzy video playback on TV screens, probably due to their obsolete choice of file format.

      Mentioning the Archos player in a discussion of the new iPod sounds to me an awful lot like CmdrTaco's infamous three-sentence-fragment ("No wireless. Less space than Nomad. Lame.") review of the original iPod.

      '1337-ism at its worst.
      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    128. Re:Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Gmini res is 220x176.

      That's considerably worse than the iPod.

      Well, I actully have one and mine do play full DVD res on the TV-OUT, which is what we are talking about here.

      HALF the battery life
      We are still talking about playing video here right, the gmini has 5 hours playback. The iPod has 2 hours (Or three with the bigger one). New movies often are close 2 two hours, and this is when the iPod battery is new. Sounds like you need to have a charger on the airplane.

      Horse-shit interface
      I get the impression you haven't used one?!? Are you one of those who calls everything not made by Apple horse-shit interface? Well in that case I can understand the iPOd wins by default.

      As for the rest. I have about 500 movies, ripped from cd, captured with TV card and some others. Most are in mpeg4 avi container, because that is what is considered standard. I think it's the iPod who needs an conversion as it can't play avi. If I want to convert which I often do in the morning before going to the buss it's a simple 15-20 minutes conversion from dvdres down to gmini native (To save battery when playing). I don't consider that hard or timecunsuming at all (It takes more time to take a shower and eat breakfast).

    129. Re:Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have about 500 movies, ripped from cd, captured with TV card and some others. Most are in mpeg4 avi container, because that is what is considered standard.

      Arrrr! Yer movies are ripped from CD ye say? Ahoy, me hearty! Me thinks ye may have come across these movies by scurrilous means.

      Avast! No wonder ye be forced ta put up with an inferior format. H.264 is magnificent to mine eyes, but alas, most of the jolly file-swappers out on the net be not aware of the like.

  2. More at CBS news by Lord+Byron+II · · Score: 3, Informative
    1. Re:More at CBS news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's good that you posted with your user name.

      That makes you a whore - not a slut.

      Good for You!!

    2. Re:More at CBS news by op12 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Finally I can catch up on shows I missed while driving to work the next day.

    3. Re:More at CBS news by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      "On Wednesday, Apple also introduced newer, thinner models of the all-in-one iMac laptop."

      That was such an informative article!

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    4. Re:More at CBS news by NMerriam · · Score: 1

      LOL, great catch. Thank god for journalists and japanese-english translators. They provide endless amusement :)

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    5. Re:More at CBS news by Jambon · · Score: 1
      Finally I can catch up on shows I missed while driving to work the next day.

      Just make sure to sue Apple when you crash so we can bitch about it here on Slashdot.

    6. Re:More at CBS news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it's good to see that CBS News is as accurate as ever:

      > On Wednesday, Apple also introduced newer, thinner
      > models of the all-in-one iMac laptop.

  3. Erm...TV Shows? by lxt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think the *biggest thing* is the fact you can now download TV shows, like Lost, for $1.99 an episode. I think that's pretty earth shattering...a 3 minute pop video, or a 45 minute TV show for the same price?

    1. Re:Erm...TV Shows? by zookie · · Score: 5, Insightful


      Even more than the price comparison, the big deal here is that Apple has gotten a big content provider to agree to a different distribution method than broadcast TV. Up until now, you were lucky to get the content providers to agree to video-on-demand for cable subscribers (only HBO and a few other cable outlets signed up). If ABC is going to offer shows for sale via Internet download, this could be a watershed event.

    2. Re:Erm...TV Shows? by sgant · · Score: 1

      We can only hope.

      I totally welcome this. Now, are these shows like Lost going to be available at the same time they're playing Live? Or will we have to wait a few days afterwards? Also, what will the resolution be?

      HD rez would be the best of course and they would have SO many people buying these things...but I doubt they'll do that. At least have it at 640x480 resolution.

      Any word yet on what the actual rez will be on these things? Did they announce that?

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    3. Re:Erm...TV Shows? by foobsr · · Score: 1

      I think that's pretty earth shattering...a 3 minute pop video, or a 45 minute TV show for the same price?

      No, it is not. Just an example of estimated price margins.

      CC.

      --
      TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
    4. Re:Erm...TV Shows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Native resolution of 320x240.

    5. Re:Erm...TV Shows? by LehiNephi · · Score: 1

      Will they be offering these downloads without commercials? If you're paying $2 per show, I would be pretty ticked about 1/3 of my battery life being sucked up by leeching, annoying, stupid commercials.

      --
      Help find a cure for cancer. Join the [H]orde
    6. Re:Erm...TV Shows? by sgant · · Score: 1

      Found my answers:

      Yes, you can buy current episodes, and you can buy them the day after they are broadcast. They're ad free so you don't need to fast forward through the commercials, 320 x 240 again. An hour show is about the size of five albums. Depending on your speed it's about 10-20 minute to download an episode. What are they going to cost? $1.99 an episode for current season and past seasons. We have free previews on every episode.

      OK, not to complain or anything...I mean, this is certainly a step in the right direction. But 320x240? For 2 bucks?

      Well, I don't want to seem ungrateful...

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    7. Re:Erm...TV Shows? by nunchux · · Score: 1

      I think the *biggest thing* is the fact you can now download TV shows, like Lost, for $1.99 an episode. I think that's pretty earth shattering...a 3 minute pop video, or a 45 minute TV show for the same price?

      You can't measure that way. If you like the 3-minute song, you could potentially play it thousands of times. But you probably won't watch that episode of "Lost" more than once, maybe a few more times if you're a fanboy.

      I also would not get so attached to the price for TV downloads. The waters are being tested to see what the market will bear. If downloading proves to be a popular means of getting TV content, that's going to compete with broadcast TV... And the backbone of TV is advertising. They're going to have to come up with new methods of embedding ads, or charge more per download.

    8. Re:Erm...TV Shows? by CptTripps · · Score: 1

      That was my favorite part. I could give 2 shits about a music video, but to be able to see a TV show...THAT is huge!

      One step closer to getting rid of y tv.

      --


      My .sig can beat up your honor student.
    9. Re:Erm...TV Shows? by dreamer-of-rules · · Score: 1

      They can be downloaded the very next day after it airs.

      If you figure that you can put 4 shows on a DVD, that's $8 (from the companies perspective) and they have no material or distribution or on-stock costs. A fair trade for the lower cost.

      Plus! This would augment the Neilson ratings! Imagine if this were available when Firefly or Wonderfalls was airing. Fox wouldn't have been able to kill it off by repeatedly changing the schedule at the last minute. [rant](Didn't you get the memo? It was at 8pm today. Sorry, it was on Thursday this week. I wonder why the ratings are so low?)[/rant]

      --
      Everyone is entitled to his own opinions, but not his own facts.
    10. Re:Erm...TV Shows? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      "Will they be offering these downloads without commercials?"

      Yup.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    11. Re:Erm...TV Shows? by F_Scentura · · Score: 1

      The pay-episodes, yes. I'm sure content providers will toy around with free episodes with the commercials intact, though.

    12. Re:Erm...TV Shows? by Seanasy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Makes you wonder: When did Apple and Disney (ABC) become friends again? Smart move by Disney in my opinion.

    13. Re:Erm...TV Shows? by doughrama · · Score: 1

      I'm with you man. Today's BIG annoucement is leans heavily on the gimmicky side. Still think that video iPod is a lame idea, though it's nice it doesn't raise the price of the iPod.

      320x240 basically make the video useless for anything but iPod use. Yeah, it's neat... but a total gimmick.

      I see people on here saying that $1.99 is a good price. I say bullshit, that price sucks. I consider a 3 minute song much more valuable than a 60ish minute long network tv show. I'll watch the show MAYBE twice, but I'll listen to the song over and over throughout the course of my life. I'd be happy to pay $.50 for a tv show, at $1.00 I'd be choosy, and at $1.99 I'd have to be damn desperate. And that's if the content was 720p... This is lame 320x240 craptasticness. Seriously, would you pay $10 a month for ABC on cable, or $10 for 5 ABC tv shows? I wouldn't... Though I do pay $10 a month for HBO, but at least I get to see some boobs once in a while.

      I'm normally a Apple supporter, I like their products. But I just can't get behind this gimmick. As much as I don't like this idea I do view this as small stepping stone towards an Apple branded DVR and downloadable HD movies.

    14. Re:Erm...TV Shows? by RM6f9 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but: While they offer the recorded episodes for sale with one hand (cheering), what might they be doing to further obfuscate your ability to record from broadcasts with the other (evil)?

      --
      Take the 90-Day Challenge! http://rwmurker.bodybyvi.com/
    15. Re:Erm...TV Shows? by himself · · Score: 1

      And if these initial ABC programs are popular, who knows what else from Disney's stable of media properties may hit the web? ESPN, anyone? (Hey, if His Steveness can take on the music cartels, maybe he can beat down the MLB owners, too!)
            What else does Disney own, anyway? Lemme see here... Wow: http://corporate.disney.go.com/corporate/overview. html
            There's a lot there to choose from.

    16. Re:Erm...TV Shows? by forkazoo · · Score: 1

      I expect lots of product placements.

      Next week on CSI:

      Oh my god, there is blood everywhere! I had better use Tide brand laundry detergent to do my laundry today. Only tide can get out the horrible filth of an accidental death due to slip and fall in the shower. Oh, if only steve had been wearing Nike brand shoes with new SuperGrip soles, he might still be alive. Nike shoes could have saved him from slipping to his death. If he were still alive, we could go to a McDonalds restaurant to eat Big Mac Value Meals, just like we had planned. I still have the appointment in my handy and reliable Palm Tungsten. Woe is me!

      This way, they can still charge for ads, but they can get away without editing them out for the bought downloads. Hooray for double dipping.

    17. Re:Erm...TV Shows? by imbrokn · · Score: 1

      I think generally you'll watch a TV show once where as you might watch a music video 10 times? Maybe. I personally wouldn't spend 10 cents for a music video, but i would spend two bucks for a show that i couldn't get home to watch.

    18. Re:Erm...TV Shows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or I can download it less than an hour after it airs for $1.99 less.

    19. Re:Erm...TV Shows? by bnenning · · Score: 1

      And the backbone of TV is advertising.

      It was, but times change. PVRs are becoming more and more popular, and when you have one there's no reason to ever watch a commercial again. Direct payment is the future.

      They're going to have to come up with new methods of embedding ads, or charge more per download.

      I don't see that. How much does a typical episode cost to produce? $5 million or so? That's profitable with 3 million buyers at $2.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    20. Re:Erm...TV Shows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you can record it using a $50 tv card the moment they airs.

    21. Re:Erm...TV Shows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $50 > $0. I like the $0 better.

    22. Re:Erm...TV Shows? by fatcatman · · Score: 1

      You can't measure that way. If you like the 3-minute song, you could potentially play it thousands of times. But you probably won't watch that episode of "Lost" more than once, maybe a few more times if you're a fanboy.

      Yeah, I've heard this argument several times and I still don't buy it. It doesn't matter how many times I'm going to use it. Imagine if software was sold this way. If Microsoft charged $500 for Windows and justified it on the basis it will get used more often than Powerpoint, people would be up in arms.

      Or physical items. If a couch cost fifty times as much to make as a bed, should they be priced the same because you'll spend more time using the bed?

    23. Re:Erm...TV Shows? by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      "The waters are being tested to see what the market will bear. If downloading proves to be a popular means of getting TV content, that's going to compete with broadcast TV... And the backbone of TV is advertising."

      Which is interesting in of itself.

      Remember that "TV" does not produce television episodes. There are television studios that produce episodes. These are then sold to TV networks. Because the network is the customer, I admit, the customer gets some say over the content of the episode (eg, "network censors", some cross-promotional material, etc.). This has also become blurred in recent years as media conglomerates have come along and bought studios and networks--for example, take a look at how many ABC TV shows are produced by Disney or Touchstone. But even with this ownership, the story is the same (although it's "funny money" because one part of the organization is paying another part).

      For these conglomerates, it's mostly an accounting issue. ABC costs X dollars to run. If people aren't watching their shows, ABC is losing money. Conversely, Touchstone pictures is making more money because people are buying episodes a la carte. Will these two offset each other--and will it matter if it does?

      For the non-conglomerated studios and production companies, it creates an easy way to "sell" new video content. There's a bigger issue of the "upfront" cost--essentially, studios would have to risk this. On the other hand, it's a similar risk to what they take with movies, so it is something they understand.

    24. Re:Erm...TV Shows? by rsborg · · Score: 1
      Makes you wonder: When did Apple and Disney (ABC) become friends again? Smart move by Disney in my opinion.

      Answer: as soon as Eisner quit. Make no bones, Jobs (and Roy Disney) hated Eisner, not Disney the company... I'm sure that the new management @ Disney know that Jobs has the advantage here, and well, he has been good for business lately.

      Link: http://breakingnews.iol.ie/news/story.asp?j=158323 324&p=y583z4x3x

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    25. Re:Erm...TV Shows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because it's called Netzero doesn't mean it's free. Ask your parents about that monthly charge on their visa and they will explain it to you. Unless you are in college and then of course it's free. Until your first loan payment is due.

    26. Re:Erm...TV Shows? by askegg · · Score: 1

      I agree. This is the start of the revolution. Studios will now be able to go direct to consumer and recieve payment for their products. Better products will be rewarded with larger incomes and we all benefit.

      I like this model better than the current situation in which networks purchase what they think will be popular (based on ratings and surveys) and then pay for it by charging companies to advertise their products during these shows.

      The new model is simplier and more direct. I have always said I would be glad to pay for the Discovery Channel, but I don't want most of the other crap. This takes that idea to the extreme. Now I can watch the shows I want, when I want. No media network can dictate the menu or my viewing habits.

      --
      I don't make predictions, and I never will.
  4. Wonder if I can.. by MetaPhyzx · · Score: 1

    Get my Jetta retrofit... then again. The present ipod connection method is working in the car. No need for a new gadget/harness..

    --
    Blacker than my baby girl's stare. Black like the veil that the muslimina wear. Black like the planet that they fear...
  5. From Engadget by dancpsu · · Score: 5, Informative

    Act I: The iMac G5. We sold over a million of them in its first year. What better place to put the computer than right behind the display? Today we're introducing and all new iMac. [It looks extremely similar] Three great new features.

    (1) It's even thinner. The 20-inch is now thinner than the 17 used to be.

    (2) iSight videocam. The new mac has an iSight built in. The camera has even better specs. Right out of the box videoconferencing without any extra stuff. We wrote a new app called PhotoBooth. [Demo: It has a built in flash - the entire display flashes. There are special effects including "Warhol" and effects that morph your face goofily.]

    (3) Front Row. It s a new way to experience the media on your computer. It's an incredible way to enjoy your music, your videos, and your photos ... from your sofa. We've done a remote control, Apple style. It's got six buttons. [Demo: He presses remote and a menu for Music / Photo / DVD / Video zooms in. There's a giant iPod-style interface for music. "I can enjoy my music from across the room and see the artwork."

    Photos navigates through everything in iPhoto with slide show effects for albums.

    "Now, a lot of people watch DVDs in their iMac, and it would be nice to control them from across the room. Now you can." [Loads DVD of The Incredibles with menu that blurs out the typically unusable menu on the DVD with an iPod-style menu. Movie posters and trailers in HD format streamed from apple.com] This remote control, I just wanted to point something that to me captures what Apple is all about. [Shot of huge button-congested remotes next to the tiny 6-button Apple remote]

    Specs: Bluetooth, Superdrive, Mighty Mouse standard. 17-inch $1299. 20-inch $1699. Available today.

    Act II: The iPod. We announced yesterday that we had shipped almost 30 million iPods. Our market share, 75% of all MP3 players shipping. Five weeks ago we introduced the iPod nano. And you know what? We shipped over a million iPod nanos in the first 17 days, and we could not meet demand. But what about the white iPod? It's been a huge success for us. And therefore, we're going to replace it. The new white iPod. And yes, it does video.

    Specs: Same width and height as current model, but thinner. QVGA (324 x 240) pixel 260,000 color 2.5-inch display. h.264 and MPEG-4 at 30 fps. TV out. 30GB and 60GB models. Same width and height. 30GB is 31% thinner than the curent 20GB model [Making it 0.44-inches thick--say wha?]. 60G is 12% thinner than 20GB. 30G up to 75 hours of video, $299. 60G up to 150 hours video, $399. Shipping in one week.

    And, by popular demand, we make it in black. They also come with a nice carrying case, to keep 'em all perfect. [Thin plastic sleeve--aw shucks]

    [AD: U2 performing live. Oh wait ... it's on an iPod! New silhouette ad with Eminem -- it's not silhouette but a limited color palette. Steve likes the ads so much he runs each one twice. ]

    The new iPod will be 30% thinner than the current 20GB iPod (making it 0.44-inches thick--say wha?), and will feature a 60GB version (which should be thinner than the current 0.63-inch thick 20GB iPod), and editions of both in black.

    What's the device named, you ask? The iPod. That's it, just The iPod. Well spare you the Prince jokes. The iPod will have TV out.

    Stevie has iTunes 6.0 up there--only about a month after introducing iTunes 5.0.

    iTunes 6.0 will also feature video and the iTunes Music Store will feature Fairplay DRMed video downloads (big surprise, right?).

    At launch over 2,000 music videos will be made available at a cost of $1.99 apiece. You can download iTunes 6.0 starting today.

    Oh, and one more thing...

    It's not only music videos you can buy. No, Apple's set up to allow you to purchase TV shows for $1.99 apiece. Get Desperate Housewives or four other ABC shows premiering on iTunes at two bucks an ep. Videos are native QVGA resolution.

    More details to come...

    --
    "Scientists don't change their minds, they just die." -- Max Planck
    1. Re:From Engadget by dancpsu · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Act III: iTunes. You know, we have distributed over 200 million copes of iTunes now in the world, and those are only the copies we know about. iTunes in the US has an 84 percent market share for all legally downloaded music. We released iTunes 5 just five weeks ago, but a lot has changed. And so today we're introducing iTunes 6. We've been busy!

            1. (1) Gifting. This has been the most requested feature. You can gift (i.e. buy) iTunes songs for someone else by song, album, or playlist.
            2. Customer reviews.
            3. Just for You. Personalized recommendations. We're going to be recommending albums and singles based on what you've bought before. It's going to be a beta, we'd like your feedback on it.
            4. Video. If we're going to be able to play video on the iPod we're going to need away to buy video. Starting today we have 2,000 music videos for sale.[Shows Madonna catalogue]

      What do they cost? $1.99 each. But we didn't stop there; we're adding some other videos you can buy. Pixar is putting up six of their award-winning short videos. $1.99 each. We are downloading videos 320 x 240, which is the native resolution of the iPod. They're about the size of six songs. All songs are governed by FairPlay. You can play them on up to five computers. They're not rentals. You own them -- they never time out. [Demo of gifting, customer reviews, Just for You, and videos including "Vogue," a U2 live exclusive. Demo of watching U2 video using Front Row on an iMac, playing photos and videos from an iPod on a big screen]

      One more thing...

      We have one more thing today, a pretty big thing. We're announcing one more thing that you can buy off the iTunes store today, and that is TV shows. What's the number one show on TV? What's the second? Lost. And who has these shows? ABC. And who owns ABC? [Disney logo on screen.] I know those guys!

      Lost, Desperate Housewives, Night Stalker, That's So Raven, The Suite Life.

      Yes, you can buy current episodes, and you can buy them the day after they are broadcast. They're ad free so you don't need to fast forward through the commercials, 320 x 240 again. An hour show is about the size of five albums. Depending on your speed it's about 10-20 minute to download an episode. What are they going to cost? $1.99 an episode for current season and past seasons. We have free previews on every episode.

      Thanks everyone!

      --
      "Scientists don't change their minds, they just die." -- Max Planck
    2. Re:From Engadget by Golias · · Score: 1

      Huh. So.... no G5 tower update. No rumored dual-core G5 systems again. Still no sign of the 3.0 GHz towers which were supposed to arrive way back in 2004. Harrumph.

      No wonder they are dumping IBM for Intel.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    3. Re:From Engadget by HeavyMS · · Score: 0

      "Videos are native QVGA resolution" And here i was hopeing for the ability to download hi res tv shows for 1.99$ a pop to watch on my XBox Media Center :( *sniff*

    4. Re:From Engadget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      They're not rentals. You own them

      nice to see Jobs is also a blatent liar.

      the public will stop swallowing this bullcrap the second one of these guys has the balls to call it what it is.

      "they're not rentals. You hold a personal viewing license that can be revoked at any time per the eula."

      That is the truth, what jobs said at the top was a bold faced lie.

    5. Re:From Engadget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awesome karma whoring job, dude. You even managed to split it into 2 posts for a total of +10!

      Way to go, you've made me proud.

    6. Re:From Engadget by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      "What's the number one show on TV?"

      CSI.

      "What's the second? Lost."

      According to Nielsen, the #2 is "Desperate Housewives." "Lost" is #4, behind "Without a Trace."

    7. Re:From Engadget by dangitman · · Score: 1

      "they're not rentals. You hold a personal viewing license that can be revoked at any time per the eula." That is the truth, what jobs said at the top was a bold faced lie. Maybe you should look up the word "rental." The file is your property. Are Apple fgoing to come andf delete it? IK don't see how it's possible for them to get you to "return" the rental to the store.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  6. Man, was I wrong. by Faust7 · · Score: 3, Funny

    And here I thought they were finally releasing the successor to the Apple IIGS.

    Or they fixed up the Apple /// even better this time. Or they bristled at the term "Apple ][ Minus" and went back to Integer BASIC without Autostart. Or they followed up on that Pippin console.

    Quiet you, it could still happen.

    1. Re:Man, was I wrong. by iocat · · Score: 1

      The GS was basically the successor to the Apple III. The GS OS was basically the same thing as the "SOS" (Sophisticated Operating System) which powered the Apple III.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    2. Re:Man, was I wrong. by Satan+Dumpling · · Score: 1

      Hey, don't bash the IIGS!
      I had one of those as a kid.
      It had a color screen, one of those new fangled 3.5" floppies, and everything.
      I even had a music program I programmed Motley Crue sheet music into. :)

    3. Re:Man, was I wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you're smoking crack. The IIGS had nothing to do with the ///. Go check your history books again.

  7. One more thing... by all+your+mwbassguy+a · · Score: 4, Funny

    no bluetooth. doesnt support ogg vorbis. lame.

    1. Re:One more thing... by centinall · · Score: 1

      forget bluetooth and ogg, what about Real audio and video?

    2. Re:One more thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      aye :(

      The no ogg vorbis is the real killer for me. If they had that, I'd go out and buy an iPod this minute. As it is, I'm left scouring online stores for any leftover stock of the Rio Karma.

    3. Re:One more thing... by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Mac zealots use AAC because it's the default format for importing music into iTunes. It is to the Mac community what WMA is to the Windows zealot community.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    4. Re:One more thing... by IainMH · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oh a big bag of _-*WOOSH* to everyone who has replied to this so far!

      It's referencing CmdrTaco's infamous review of the iPod when it first came out.

      http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257&tid=107

      N.B. When *is* Slashdot going to start adding years to the timestamps?

    5. Re:One more thing... by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      no bluetooth

      honestly. why would you want bluetooth on an ipod. Seriously. How long would it f-ing take to copy an album to the thing?!?!?!

      one of my friends was bitching that there weren't any mp3 players with bluetooth. I can't figure out why anyone would want that. bluetooth copies at like what... 5K/sec? do you really want to copy songs to your iPod at modem speeds?

      sheesh. You were modded funny. maybe you meant it as a joke. Maybe you didn't. =P

      --



      ...spike
      Ewwwwww, coconut...
    6. Re:One more thing... by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      And don't forget - less space than a Nomad.

    7. Re:One more thing... by ClownsScareMe · · Score: 1

      Thank you for that. I had many good laughs reading the comments to that article.

      --
      I read Slashdot for the articles
    8. Re:One more thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No he said Bluetooth, not Wifi. Try to stay with me here. The iPod appears to your phone as a standard bluetooth headset. Ok so now your phone has given over phone call control to the iPod. Now we add a nice wireless stereo headset paired to the iPod. Get it?

    9. Re:One more thing... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1


      Posted by CmdrTaco on 18:20 23rd October, 2001
      from the well-thats-not-very-exciting dept.


      If your logged in, you get to choose the display format :)

      Preferences/Homepage tab/ "Date/Time Format".

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    10. Re:One more thing... by krakelohm · · Score: 1

      Why... Wireless headphones.

      --
      You are all a bunch of idots.
    11. Re:One more thing... by m50d · · Score: 1
      Mac zealots use AAC because it's the default format for importing music into iTunes. It is to the Mac community what WMA is to the Windows zealot community.

      I'm not saying there's anything wrong with AAC, just that it's in basically the same situation as OGG - technically superior to MP3, a generally good format, but noone cares outside a small zealot community.

      --
      I am trolling
    12. Re:One more thing... by aCC · · Score: 5, Informative

      sheesh. You were modded funny. maybe you meant it as a joke. Maybe you didn't. =P

      You must be new here.

      Read this to understand why it's funny. Notice the editor's comment to the story. Still cracks me up every time I read it. :-)

    13. Re:One more thing... by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      Its not just zealotry. Its one word: "Dolby". Also the "realaudio 10" is AAC too. Real gave up ATRAC 3 for it.

      I tested .ogg and I say that format is very good too but I have never met a "real person" saying WMA is better sounding than all...

      I don't know who Microsoft carries those "blind listening tests" with.

    14. Re:One more thing... by IainMH · · Score: 1

      Sir, (or improbably madam) thank you. - A thousand blessings on your home this evening.

    15. Re:One more thing... by Kickersny.com · · Score: 0

      Just because it is the default format for Windows importing does not make it good... A good media player should have support for all major formats. Yes, I consider OGG a 'major' format; even if it is just 1% of the computing community that uses it, 1% of a lot of people is still quite a few.

    16. Re:One more thing... by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 1

      ohhhhh yeah.

      I read that. I think I actually posted on there, too.

      *kicks self*

      --



      ...spike
      Ewwwwww, coconut...
    17. Re:One more thing... by MayorDefacto · · Score: 1
      honestly. why would you want bluetooth on an ipod. Seriously. How long would it f-ing take to copy an album to the thing?!?!?!

      Don't think copy, think play. Bluetooth iPod + bluetooth-enabled car = most awesome iPod integration ever. Climb in the driver's seat and the car would automagically find your music.

      That would be an announcement.

    18. Re:One more thing... by MKalus · · Score: 2, Funny
      I don't know who Microsoft carries those "blind listening tests" with.


      Deaf People?
      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    19. Re:One more thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1%? Uh, didn't you mean 12%

    20. Re:One more thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, real "funny."

      Nevermind that the iPod pretty much locks out anything but MP3, AAC (not even AAC-HE) and Apple's stupid lossless format. "Fair" Play freezes out anyone else that wants a piece of the online market as well, in some ways.

      Nevermind that Apple is quickly approaching a monopoly in the media player market.

      I'd love to find a decent Ogg-capable player and tell you iPod people to bite me. Really--I know that Apple doesn't really care about Ogg or FLAC or any other free format. I get it. All the petitions in Apple's forums, the constant griping on Slashdot, the stupid jokes (I guess "doesn't support Ogg" is the new "beowulf" around here). I GET IT. I'm willing to go elsewhere. Apple's growing monopoly will soon make that all but impossible.

      Oh but it's "funny." Har har. Slashdot gushes over Apple every time Steve Jobs flushes the toilet. And yet, if this were Microsoft the wailing and gnashing of teeth would be so loud here you'd be scanning the skies for the four horsemen.

      Did Slashdot give any free advertising to Archos? Or how about Neuros and their video player? Nah--there's no shiny Apple logo on those so they don't get anything.

    21. Re:One more thing... by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Sony PSP owners (with 2.foo firmware) can also play AAC, though not the bought songs with Fairplay.

  8. Video iPod pornography. by CyricZ · · Score: 4, Funny

    Has anyone begun selling Video iPod pornography yet?

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:Video iPod pornography. by Zach978 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I can finally get interested in Podcasting...

      --

      "I told you a million times not to exaggerate!"
    2. Re:Video iPod pornography. by tbone1 · · Score: 4, Funny
      Has anyone begun selling Video iPod pornography yet?

      Does "Desperate Housewives" count?

      Sincerely,
      Terrell Owens

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
    3. Re:Video iPod pornography. by forkazoo · · Score: 1
      Has anyone begun selling Video iPod pornography yet?

      No, it's all still free.
    4. Re:Video iPod pornography. by Chocolate+Teapot · · Score: 3, Funny

      I believe that Apple may have considered adding adult content to the iTunes store, but following the lack of serious interest in this product, they decided that it is too much of a niche market :)

      --
      Modest doubt is called the beacon of the wise. - William Shakespeare
    5. Re:Video iPod pornography. by doughrama · · Score: 1

      Hrm. Intersting definition of quadruple anal penetration. Somehow I suspect you're still a virgin.

    6. Re:Video iPod pornography. by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess that proves pornography isn't educational.

    7. Re:Video iPod pornography. by doughrama · · Score: 1

      My mistake.

      No idea how I could've possible thought you were a virgin.

    8. Re:Video iPod pornography. by kalel666 · · Score: 3, Funny

      "I'm talking about quadruple anal penetration. Yes, four cocks in one woman's tight cunt."

      Four nearsighted, cross eyed drunks, with no depth perception, apparently.

      --
      I HAVE CUBIC WISDOM THAT TRANSCENDS AND CONTRADICTS ONE DAY GODS
    9. Re:Video iPod pornography. by CyricZ · · Score: 1

      I accept your apology. Now please, try to refrain from such mistakes in the future. Good day!

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    10. Re:Video iPod pornography. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since you don't seem to be able to tell the difference between anal and vaginal sex, are you really sure they're yours?

    11. Re:Video iPod pornography. by winkydink · · Score: 3, Funny

      or a slashdotter who doesn't know his ass from a... never mind

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    12. Re:Video iPod pornography. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      eeeeew!
      you mean like watching two iPods having intercourse using a cross-cable?

      that's sick, man!

    13. Re:Video iPod pornography. by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      I am _sure_ all big porn industry checking those news right now. Who knows? They may had a meeting with Steve Jobs about this already...

      I bet they are already interested but Apple "image" won't allow Apple to open an adult store easily like Real Networks.

      I bet the most successful part of "realone media platform" after sports is Playboy TV.

    14. Re:Video iPod pornography. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can only hope, it will give the pervets on the bus something to stare at besides my boobs.

    15. Re:Video iPod pornography. by wall0159 · · Score: 1

      surely you mean porncasting? ;-)

    16. Re:Video iPod pornography. by askegg · · Score: 1

      I don't know if I want someone watching their latest "home movies" on their ipod sitting next to me on the way home.

      --
      I don't make predictions, and I never will.
    17. Re:Video iPod pornography. by word_virus · · Score: 1

      You know, it's almost frightening how far down in the Slashdot comments I had to scroll before I FINALLY saw someone asking this question.

      Seriously, rip your DVD porn into iTunes with Handbrake (Here's a HOWTO for the uninitiated) and you've got the perfect, private, pocketable porno player... with alliteration, even.

      I'm suprised the GOP hasn't already pre-ordered every single one of these "to protect the children".

    18. Re:Video iPod pornography. by smatthew · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I think you're mistaken. quadruple anal penetration does not use the c*nt, but rather the backdoor (hence the "anal" part of "anal penetration")

      Sincerely,

      The Sex Police

      --
      slashdot username - at - email.domain.name
  9. cool news by Ankou · · Score: 4, Funny

    According to Stuff magazine:

    "You'll be able to buy TV shows from the iTunes Music Store - Desperate Housewives, Lost and more shows from ABC and Disney." I guess that means Terry Hatcher will be getting into MY pants!

    1. Re:cool news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I guess that means Terry Hatcher will be getting into MY pants!

      Terry Hatcher? Sounds like some NFL linebacker. Well, you can bend over while he gets into your pants if you want, but I, for one, am holding out for the gorgeous Teri Hatcher!!

    2. Re:cool news by wildsurf · · Score: 1

      I guess that means Teri Hatcher will be getting into MY pants!

      Forget the tribe. My pants have spoken!

      --
      Weeks of coding saves hours of planning.
    3. Re:cool news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell me when they get real shows on iTunes, like from Adult Swim or SciFi. The drivel on broadcast isn't even worth the effort to pirate.

  10. Ipod capable cars... by Prophet+of+Nixon · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know if these "ipod ready" cars just have standard line inputs (it would be about time) or if they're some sort of bastard proprietary jack?

    1. Re:Ipod capable cars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends, but from what I've seen if it's advertized as iPod ready it will be a connection to the dock jack not the headphone out. They do this so you can "control your iPod from your Stereo."

    2. Re:Ipod capable cars... by NekSnappa · · Score: 2, Informative

      These units have a dock connector in the glove box, and allow you to control the iPod using the stereo controls on the steering wheel.

      --
      I want to shoot the messenger!
    3. Re:Ipod capable cars... by Jozer99 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not sure, but I think most of them actually have a dock connecter and some limited software integration that allows you to pause, skip, ect with the stereo controls. Some even display song title and playlists, ect, while others treat the ipod as a CD changer.

    4. Re:Ipod capable cars... by pizen · · Score: 1

      Bastard proprietary jack (AKA iPod dock connector) because it's more than just line-in, it's also control.

    5. Re:Ipod capable cars... by evolutionaryLawyer · · Score: 1

      "Does anyone know if these "ipod ready" cars just have standard line inputs (it would be about time) or if they're some sort of bastard proprietary jack?"

      They use a dock connector so that you can use the normal stereo controls and wheel controls to controll the iPod. This is so that they don't call their car "iPod-ready" when all they did is add a glorified cassette adapter.

    6. Re:Ipod capable cars... by hb0mb · · Score: 1

      It's a special jack that will allow you to control your ipod via your stereo or your stereo controls on your steering wheel. In fact this is taken from a recent press release from Honda....

      American Honda announced today its new Honda Music Link iPod(R) adaptor in conjunction with Apple. This Genuine Honda accessory was developed to enable Honda drivers to utilize their iPod directly through the audio system in the all-new, redesigned, 2006 Honda Civic.

      Honda Music Link enables consumers with iPods to select their music by artist, album, genre and play list through the Honda Civic's standard controls on the audio system head unit. In addition, this system is the first of its kind to offer synthesized audio voice feedback when searching through the iPod music library with the vehicle's audio system controls.

      "We are very excited to partner with Apple and offer the Music Link accessory to our Honda consumers," said Stony Furutani, manager of Honda Accessory Marketing. "The new 2006 Civic features the newest in many technologies, which are further expanded through the addition of the Music Link iPod system.

      The Honda Music Link adaptor provides outstanding sound quality while charging the iPod at the same time by a cable conveniently located in the glove compartment. The adapter will be available starting this December exclusively for purchase and installation at Honda dealers. Suggested retail pricing for the Honda Music Link will be approximately $250 plus dealer installation. Honda Music link is backed by a full Honda factory warranty. Consumers should check with Honda dealers for specific restrictions.

    7. Re:Ipod capable cars... by Prophet+of+Nixon · · Score: 1

      Yar, that's awful... and I thought I might finally be able to get a first-party car stereo with a cd player and a line input... Oh well.

  11. Video Quality by Chubby_C · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm wondering if the resoution of the videos/shows they will be selling will be sufficient enough to watch not only on the V-Ipod but also on your computer, or on a TV (not only with the TV out)? What about burning to DVD?

    --
    - My question is: Can Slashdot be Slashdotted? -
    1. Re:Video Quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its propriatary iPod dock connector.

    2. Re:Video Quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm wondering if the resoution of the videos/shows they will be selling will be sufficient enough to watch not only on the V-Ipod but also on your computer, or on a TV (not only with the TV out)? What about burning to DVD?

      The specs (widely published as of a few minutes ago) say that it's 320x240. That's better than VHS, better than VideoCD, better than standard television, about half of DVD resolution, definitely not HDTV.

  12. No Divx support? by tommers · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Even though Apple seems to be doing great with DRMed AAC files on iPods, iPods would have totally failed if they didn't support mp3s to begin with. I wonder if the video iPod will be able to gain traction without supporting the large collections of TV episodes, music videos, and movies that users already have in their collection in Divx format.

    1. Re:No Divx support? by fracai · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The difference here is that there was an existing market of home ripping MP3 users. There isn't anything like that for home TV ripping (well, fine maybe a small one). The majority of DivX TV files are illegally procured. Well, they're at best not gained through authorized means and that's hazy enough to be illegall under current conditions.

      I expected Apple to come out with ripping software at this event. Something that would rip DVDs to iPod compatible files. I still do expect that actually. I suspect the biggest hurdle is that they have to get the MPAA on board because the DVDs are encrypted and Apple won't want to create DRMed files from your physically owned DVDs.

      I wonder if it at least plays non-FairPlay h.264 files... Off to the iPod site to check.

      --
      -- i am jack's amusing sig file
    2. Re:No Divx support? by fracai · · Score: 5, Informative

      H.264 video: up to 768 Kbps, 320 x 240, 30 frames per sec., Baseline Profile up to Level 1.3 with AAC-LC up to 160 Kbps, 48 Khz, stereo audio in .m4v, .mp4 and .mov file formats
      MPEG-4 video: up to 2.5 mbps, 480 x 480, 30 frames per sec., Simple Profile with AAC-LC up to 160 Kbps, 48 Khz, stereo audio in .m4v, .mp4 and .mov file formats


      looks like all you need to do is re-encode your DivX as h.264. shouldn't be a problem if you were able to encode the DVD or TV stream to DivX in the first place ... :)

      --
      -- i am jack's amusing sig file
    3. Re:No Divx support? by NekSnappa · · Score: 1

      Since there is also a new iTunes maybe ripping a movie to watch on you PC and uploading to your video iPod will be as trivial as doing CDs are now.

      --
      I want to shoot the messenger!
    4. Re:No Divx support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I wonder if the video iPod will be able to gain traction without supporting the large collections of TV episodes, music videos, and movies that users already have in their collection in Divx format.

      If only it were that easy. The incredibly variety of formats and codecs that people have "collected" precludes this. There is simply no standardization. "DivX" doesn't often mean "DivX, Inc.'s standardized format". It sometimes means XviD, or AC3 audio, or OGG audio or subtitles, or this or that.

      That said, Mac users will have no trouble using HandBrake DVD rips.

    5. Re:No Divx support? by adam1101 · · Score: 1

      According to the iPod specs, it plays MPEG4 video up to 480x480 resolution, 30fps. But I don't think they will play the XVid/DivX clips in AVI containers (which I believe is against MPEG specs) that most people have lying around/rip to.

    6. Re:No Divx support? by Damek · · Score: 1

      Theoretically, however, someone might be able to take ffmpeg (or ffmpegX :) and convert those xvid/divx files to MP4 with AAC audio without converting the video, and have it work on the new iPod and iTunes 6. Theoretically.

    7. Re:No Divx support? by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      ...because everyone knows time is free?

    8. Re:No Divx support? by Tab+is+on+Slashdot · · Score: 1, Informative

      Not just theoretically, but in practice.

    9. Re:No Divx support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a GP2X. Plays divx.

    10. Re:No Divx support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, if you're posting on slashdot, some significant fraction of your time must be worthless.

    11. Re:No Divx support? by agraupe · · Score: 1

      My god! Not a two line mencoder command that could take at least two hours to complete on your home computer as you go to work or school! Whatever will you do??? To be fair, you can't really complain.

    12. Re:No Divx support? by anethema · · Score: 1

      Divx is also a mpeg-4 based video format, which is supported. Much easier to transcode to than h.264.

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    13. Re:No Divx support? by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1
      "To be fair", the same could have been said about the original iPod if it had not supported mp3s, and only played AACs or something, and you had to transcode all your mp3s before you could use them.

      But if it had, I sure wouldn't have bought one, and probably lots of other current iPod owners wouldn't have either.

    14. Re:No Divx support? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Divx is MPEG4 video, which is already supported..

      Not to mention, I'm not sure how well the quality would hold up in a second lossy transcode. Usually it's not too good at normal resolutions, but when you're going down to 320x240, it's probably hard to notice any loss of detail anyway.

    15. Re:No Divx support? by agraupe · · Score: 1

      I have to convert all my OGGs to MP3 before I load them on. Also, I recently found out that mencoder/mplayer does not support h.264, which throws a wrench into my plans.

  13. Video iPod -- Who Knew? by JonTurner · · Score: 4, Funny

    Talk about unexpected... that Apple sure can keep a secret!

    1. Re:Video iPod -- Who Knew? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem becomes which rumors do you believe?
      How many of us laughed at the idea that they kept up-to-date builds of OSX86 since the first release?

    2. Re:Video iPod -- Who Knew? by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      The biggest surprise to me today is Salling Clicker 3.0 shipped for mac and.. windows XP!

      And I was in closed beta test for mac version. :) If you want to keep a secret, you really can!

      http://www.salling.com/

      (I still wonder how he managed to win against evil windows bluetooth stack(s))

    3. Re:Video iPod -- Who Knew? by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      Well, with half the Internet's population pondering day and night what apple will do next and discussing it in forums, and decyphering various clues like their job postings on the FreeBSD jobs mailing list, it is only a matter of time that this cluster of minds gets on the trail.

    4. Re:Video iPod -- Who Knew? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Certainly they do. But hey.. you're talking about X86 builds, aren't you? :p

  14. Not just videos by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 4, Interesting

    TV shows (like Lost) one day after they air, and you know damn well what's next... movies.

    A video airtunes device didn't materialize, but a dock with video out and remote control did.

    --
    Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    1. Re:Not just videos by Grond · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Except the videos are at QVGA resolution (320x240). That's substantially less than even analog TV, much less DVD or HDTV. Don't count on a lot of people ditching their Tivos just yet. Or ditching bittorrent, for that matter. The videos are really just meant to play on the video-capable iPods. Frankly I think they really missed the boat. Knowing Apple, I expect what happened is that ABC/Disney (whom they still have a quasi-relationship with via Pixar) is just testing the waters, rather than Apple not having the foresight to go whole hog with legal TV show downloads. Note, for instance, that the only videos available are ABC/Disney shows and Pixar shorts.

      If it works out, I would hope to see full-res shows on offer from all sorts of networks.

      Also, I wonder...with iTunes you can burn CDs of music, right? Can you burn a DVD of the show? I expect you probably can't, but they ought to make it so you can. Would short-circuit the 'must buy a Mac mini or a new G5 in order to have a media center' thing, though. Hopefully Apple will choose the option that gives its users more freedom to use what they've bought.

    2. Re:Not just videos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This "breakthrough" could be short-lived. When Apple announced iTunes, they had the major labels onboard, so the library was very complete.
      This time they could only score a handful of TV shows by pressuring Disney (because of the PIXAR deal - ABC's parent company, and for TV programming only.
      If they do not secure similar agreements with movie studios - and it seems some have made deals with Microsoft already, they will watch and see as others take over.
      It is undeniable that without titles, iTunes would have been short lived - in fact that is what delayed them opening up shop in Europe - they couldn't get the labels onboard.
      Seems the studios won't be caught by surprise, and may demand a better deal, cutting Apple's margins.

    3. Re:Not just videos by nine-times · · Score: 1
      TV shows (like Lost) one day after they air, and you know damn well what's next... movies.

      According to ThinkSecret (which tends to be pretty reliable):

      The video playback capability, which sources say is in fact available in current models but is disabled, will be geared towards watching broadcast content, video podcasts, and other shorter videos, but Apple will not be offering movies to purchase at this time. Instead, the company is hoping to roll out a movie store later in 2006 when the "real" video iPod, which will sport a larger widescreen display wrapped in a new casing, will debut.
    4. Re:Not just videos by tanguyr · · Score: 1

      Well, Bob Cringely did notice something interesting - check out these two links:

      http://www.apple.com/movies

      http://www.apple.com/hello

      hmmmmm...

      doesn't mean they will, doesn't mean they won't... but it might mean they might.

      --
      #!/usr/bin/english
    5. Re:Not just videos by tgibbs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Except the videos are at QVGA resolution (320x240). That's substantially less than even analog TV, much less DVD or HDTV. Don't count on a lot of people ditching their Tivos just yet. Or ditching bittorrent, for that matter.

      I'm not ditching my HDTiVo. On the other hand, if I somehow manage to miss a show, or decide to pick up watching a show midseason, at $2 a pop, I'd be more likely to go to iTunes than to Bittorrent.

      This looks like a good foot-in-the-door move for Apple. At that resolution, it's not all that threatening for the TV studios. But if it turns out to be a big source of revenue, the studios might be willing to consider higher resolution.

      What strikes me as most interesting, though, is the potential for selling not merely current shows, but the huge backlist of old TV shows. These weren't HD to begin with, so the low resolution would be less of a sacrifice. And I'll bet that they'll find that they can sell individual shows to people who would not be likely to go to a video shop and pick up a DVD collection.

    6. Re:Not just videos by n8_f · · Score: 4, Informative

      They definitely need to up the video resolution (and they will, once the new video iPod comes out next year and they start integrating this with Frontrow), but I'm watching the first episode of Lost full-screen on my iBook and I have to say, the quality is about the same as the 350MB versions I get over BitTorrent. I thought it was going to be crap, but I am pretty impressed. I won't buy much more (maybe Lost, if I pick up the first season on DVD), because they really need to raise the resolution to at least TV levels (640x480 or 720x480) and I don't want to have to buy it twice, but for just 2 bucks, I think everyone should check it out. Plus, it only uses 40% of my processor, which isn't bad at all.

      I have been waiting for this for so long! Now if I could just get the Daily Show, Peepshow, or The Mighty Boosh....

    7. Re:Not just videos by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      I have been waiting for this for so long! Now if I could just get ... The Mighty Boosh....

      You've missed it now, but The Mighty Boosh was available for live streaming from the BBC web site for several weeks after it aired. Not sure if you could save it (I've never tried saving a Real stream).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    8. Re:Not just videos by n8_f · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Oh, and btw, play them in Quicktime Player. For buying, downloading, and keeping track of your video, iTunes is great, but it blows for playback. I think the only thing that the update did was change the name to iTunes 6 and add the Video source. It was cool that the Video source had the Decemberists video for "16 Military Wives" that I downloaded from their site and added to iTunes in 4.8 as well as the Morcheeba video I got through iTunes (at about the same time), but the integration is seriously lacking. Same with the iTMS. I wonder how last minute this was? I had thought they were planning this since video was introduced earlier this summer with 4.7 or 4.8, but this is absolutely a 1.0 release lacking Apple's usual polish. Perhaps podcasting sucked up a lot of resources and this was way down the priority list. Still, the iPod w/ video was in development for a while, they knew this was coming. The iTMS stuff could be fixed later today or next week, but I think it is obvious that iTunes is not meant for video playback. I think all new machines will be shipping with Frontrow (at least all the Intel ones). I wonder when they will make it available for older machines?

    9. Re:Not just videos by n8_f · · Score: 1

      Are you a Brit? I'm pretty sure that the streaming used some location-based technology (if a table of IP blocks and their country is technology) that only made it available to people living in Great Britain (not even Canada could get it). Also, if you had a license, you could watch next weeks episode a week before it aired. Cool, but not an option for me. Luckily, I found it on BitTorrent (actually, that is how I first found it and got hooked). Going back and watching the first series, I didn't like it as much as the second, although it was still pretty good. I think I liked the original radio episodes better than the first series. But "Milky Joe", God, that is pure comedy gold!

      I would love to be able to get first run BBC shows here in the U.S. (other than by downloading them illegally), and Think Secret said Apple had a media event later today scheduled at the BBC, so I am really hoping that is the case. My dream scenario is that the BBC prices their stuff cheaper than Hollywood and I, the consumer, get better quality, cheaper goods and some real competition, while the Beeb gets access to a huge new market and massive amounts of basically cost-free revenue (they've already made the shows). But they could probably price them higher and I'd still buy them. I do a lot of Amazon.co.uk shopping....

    10. Re:Not just videos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They definitely need to up the video resolution... but I'm watching the first episode of Lost full-screen on my iBook

      No kidding. iTunes video is using the same resolution as that wildly successful format called VCD (video compact disc). Do you remember VCDs from the early '90s, when CD-ROM drives started appearing on high-end PCs? Do you know anyone that bought non-porn VCDs?

      iTunes video is fine for watching on an iPod, but users who want to watch TV shows on their computer monitor should be better off buying a TV tuner card or USB TV tuner (which should come bundled with DVR software).

    11. Re:Not just videos by tf23 · · Score: 1

      so how long till a hack's released that enables the video playback feature for everyone that has the yesterday's-current 60 and 30gb photo ipod's?

    12. Re:Not just videos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and you know damn well what's next... movies.

      I'm sure Apple would love to do movies next. I'm sure they would love to have even launched with some Hollywood content, but this content ain't easy to come by. The Studios have seen how Apple can turn their product into marketing material for Apple's product and I'm sure don't like the terms being forced on them, hence music videos and TV shows.

      And the people they need to get on side? The same people they fucked off with their heavy handed music deals. Apple aren't the good guys in this. There are no good guys.

    13. Re:Not just videos by prockcore · · Score: 1

      the quality is about the same as the 350MB versions I get over BitTorrent.

      If you say so.. I grabbed the second season premiere of Lost off bittorrent (power outage made us miss it), it was about 350megs, it was a 720x480 xvid.

      If you say 320x240 is "about the same" as 720x480 you need to check the quality of that LCD you were watching on.

      A friend bought the 3rd episode off itunes and watched it full screen on a 21" viewsonic and the quality was definately worse than analog TV.

    14. Re:Not just videos by n8_f · · Score: 1

      WTF? How was my response to my post "Flamebait"?

    15. Re:Not just videos by n8_f · · Score: 4, Informative
      Yes, a 21" monitor at close range is not the ideal viewing platform for this video.

      That said, you don't understand digital video if you don't understand how video at 320x240 could look better than video at 720x480. When looking at compressed video, the resolution is almost useless (after all, my video was 1024x768 when I played it full-screen). The most important characteristics are bitrate and codec (in that order). The bitrate of the Apple videos are about 650kb/s, while the bitrate of a 350MB encode of an hour-long drama like Lost, 24, etc. is about 1000kb/s. However, those are encoded with DivX, XviD, or a couple of other variants of MPEG-4, while Apple uses the far superior h.264 (MPEG-4 Part 10). So that closes the gap considerably.

      The third most important characteristic, and again, far more important than resolution (within reason - 64x48 video is going to be resolution-limited with regard to video quality no matter what the bitrate) would be the source video. And here again Apple is far superior. The DivX releases are taken from cable or broadcast signals and these have undergone at least one analog to digital conversion and very likely several. Both transmission methods throw out a lot of data, especially color information, even with digital cable. Then it is recorded to a computers hard drive, typically encoded as a high bit-rate MPEG-2 file (again losing data - even if it is straight DV, you are losing data) and then encoded again to the DivX format for final distribution. Compare that to Apple, which should be able to take the original HD digital masters and convert them directly to the digital format.

      Probably the fourth most important characteristic is going to be processing time. Most modern video codecs are asymmetric, in that encoding is far more expensive than decoding. And encoding video is a very computationally intensive process. There is a general tradeoff in terms of computational time and video quality. You quickly run into diminishing returns, but you can spent a lot of time optimizing your encoding, especially along the time scale (compressing using elements from previous/subsequent frames; this is usually limited by the decoders minimum requirements). Apple can probably throw a lot more processing power at the problem than anybody encoding TV broadcasts.

      So, yes, the resolution is only 320x240 and that sucks, but the quality is pretty high and the added detail allows it to scale well. The tiling is definitely more pronounced when scaled to full-screen in the Apple video, but the DivX versions have a lot more mosquito noise, which isn't surprising when you realize they are encoding with four times the number of pixels but only two thirds more kb/s.

      Overall, the edge goes to the DivX video, but it is a lot closer than most people would intuitively think. Remember, I'm not comparing this to analog TV, which is guaranteed to be better than its DivX equivalent, I am comparing it to a 350MB DivX version. Also, remember that the blurring of interlaced analog television sets tends to make motion video look better than it does on much less forgiving progressive computer monitors. If you really want to compare it to analog TV, you should watch it on an analog TV set, which is what I am going to do tonight.

    16. Re:Not just videos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No paragraphs.
      Stream-of-conscious writing.

      You were just waiting to be flamed.

    17. Re:Not just videos by n8_f · · Score: 1

      Ask a stupid question....

  15. The Mini Cooper already has this. by Black+Art · · Score: 1, Informative

    A friend of mine has a mini cooper with the ipod option. Pretty cool. The ipod just plugs into the glove compartment. The controls are accessable from the stereo. Better than listening to American radio.

    Now if I could just get BBC 6radio in a car stereo.

    --
    "Trademarks are the heraldry of the new feudalism."
    1. Re:The Mini Cooper already has this. by squidsoup · · Score: 1

      Veering swiftly offtopic here, but I should mention that we get National Public Radio shows here in New Zealand occasionally (broadcast on our national radio), and I've always found them excellent.

    2. Re:The Mini Cooper already has this. by British · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There's a few options for the IPod in the MINI Cooper.

      1.(cheapass). for $30, you can get a basic AUX port that works with any mp3 player
      2. (not so cheapass) if you have the multi-function-steering-wheel(500 bucks) and the true "ipod adapter"(150 bucks), you can switch volume & tracks with the steering wheel buttons.

      I just wish they would come out with an FM transmitter(or through the audio port if possible) that displays the currently playing track on the MINI's radio. It(along with other BMWs) tells you the track(RDS?) if the radio station supports it. Most around the twin cities do.

  16. Non-iTunes purchased video... by Powertrip · · Score: 1

    I wonder if you will be able to use Nero (with its H264/Mpeg4 codec) to code your own video and transfer it to the new iPod? Think Steevie limited playback support to DRM'd and items purchased vis iTunes music store? I would love to transfer my own videos for playback and have little interest in music videos.

    1. Re:Non-iTunes purchased video... by antifoidulus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Uh, on the apple main page it shows how you can put your home movies on the new iPod... Also, the iPod supported mp3 and non-drm AAC since day 1, why wouldn't they support the same with the video iPod....

    2. Re:Non-iTunes purchased video... by zarmanto · · Score: 1
      "Think Steevie limited playback support to DRM'd and items purchased vis iTunes music store?"

      On Apple's new animated home page, it says that you can encode your own home movies, so I would assume that it's not too much of a stretch to get most of your other video files into the iPod as well. (Of course, now you're going to have to re-encode all of your illegal divx files into either H.264 or MPEG4...)

  17. Poop by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 1

    And my new 60 GB iPod is 17 days bought - with a return policy of 14 days. Maybe I should call them anyway and see if I can get lucky on a return....

    1. Re:Poop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The special media event has been known about for longer than 17 days... what were you thinking?
      Your iPod will still do everything it was going to do when you decided to purchase it 2 1/2 weeks ago - what's the big deal?

    2. Re:Poop by EvanTaylor · · Score: 1

      in Massachusetts there is no such thing as a legal return policy under 30 days (for any reason), it may be like that i your state.

      --
      Sleep is for the weak.
    3. Re:Poop by cthellis · · Score: 1

      Try anyway. My friend caught a break and managed to trade his iPod back in that he got three weeks before the Photo was released.

  18. TV Shows, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An important distinction: the video support is part of iTunes as well. I can only imagine that iTunes will also play videos, so those of us without new VideoiPods can also take advantage of the new service.

    ABC and Disney have been announced as partners and are offering TV shows for the new iTunes, which means we'll finally have a legitimate source for paying for, and downloading, time-shiftable episodes of "LOST".

    Very cool.

    --
    M

    1. Re:TV Shows, too by schnikies79 · · Score: 2, Informative

      itunes has played video (mov) since 4.x

      --
      Gone!
    2. Re:TV Shows, too by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      Um, iTunes has been playing videos for a long time now. A year? At least? If not more. They've even had a "music videos" section of the store, with (free) videos to download.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    3. Re:TV Shows, too by DoorFrame · · Score: 1

      This does, of course, reduce the number of arguments I can make about the legitimacy of downloading TV shows without paying for them... which is a down side.

  19. At last! by Dr.Seuss · · Score: 0, Troll

    The ipod porno.

  20. Safty Concerns by jamesgamble · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You would think that there would be safty concerns with users able to watch videos on their IPod while driving. That would be a bigger distraction than a cell phone. I really don't think this is a smart move on Apple's part. What if two years down the line, some guy kills someone because he wasn't paying attention to the road, and sues Apple for distracting him. If someone can sue McDonalds for making them fat, then this could and probably will happen.

    1. Re:Safty Concerns by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Everyone who has tried to "sue McDonald's for making them fat" did so just for the "free" publicity. They've all been laughed out of court. You'd have better luck suing Apple for bundling iTunes with their iPod.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    2. Re:Safty Concerns by teratogenicbenzene · · Score: 1

      I thought about that too, but notice where the hookup for the iPod is: The glove compartment. Most people aren't going to drive around with their glove compartment open just to watch video on it.

      Of course, you might be referring to them just holding it in their hands while driving, but that same complaint is applicable across the board to any device.

      I always thought putting the iPod in the glove box seemed rather pointless, as it would have made sense pre-video iPod to have it visible. Maybe SJ is a bigger visionary than even we thought?

      --
      The Secret of Life: Proteins fold up and bind things.
    3. Re:Safty Concerns by g0at · · Score: 1
      Dude, it's time you steal a bulk case of tin-foil from your local wal-mart, and move out of the U.S.A.! How about this:
      You would think that there would be safty [sic] concerns with users able to cut their own throats open while driving. That would be a bigger distraction than a cell phone. I really don't think this is a smart move on the knife-maker's part. What if two years down the line, some guy kills himself or someone else with his pocket knife and sues Victorinox for distracting him..."

      Is it Apple's responsibility for ensuring that stupid people do not buy their product, and do not use it irresponsibly? Shit, somebody with that type of judgment should not be driving the car in the first place!

      -ben
    4. Re:Safty Concerns by blackmonday · · Score: 1

      I agree. We will also outlaw makeup, newspapers and cellphones.

    5. Re:Safty Concerns by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
      There are already portable DVD players. In fact, you can even get DVD players installed right in your car. Wasn't there a guy charged with manslaughter b/c he'd illegally installed his DVD player in the front seat so he could watch it while driving, and killed someone?

      This is a problem, but it's not Apple's problem.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    6. Re:Safty Concerns by jamesgamble · · Score: 0

      I also believe that corporations have a responsibility to release safe products. Cell phones are potentially unsafe when driving, so that is why hands free kits were invented. A Video IPod can distract a driver a bit more easily than a cell phone increasing the chance of an accident. That is something I think corporations need to take into account when they release a product.

    7. Re:Safty Concerns by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
      Well, see, there's this mode on the iPod where you don't have to look at it, you can just listen to it. It's called "music." It's as safe to use in the car as listening to the radio, especially if you just let it play and don't fiddle with song selection.

      Seriously, how could Apple make it safer to watch video while driving? It's NOT SAFE TO WATCH VIDEO WHILE DRIVING, and if people are too stupid to realize that then there's not much Apple can do about it. I suppose they could make video not work while the car is running, but what if the person in the passenger or back seat is the one watching? What should/can Apple do to ensure the safety of the stupidest 1% of their user base?

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    8. Re:Safty Concerns by anaesthetica · · Score: 1

      If a lawsuit like that were to happen, it already would have occurred from the DVD players integrated into cars, and driving directions systems integrated into dashboards that have existed for several years now.

      In most states, driving while listening to headphones is illegal. I don't see why driving while listening/viewing an iPod would be any less illegal. I doubt Apple could be held liable.

    9. Re:Safty Concerns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If i'm not mistaken, golvebox iPod hookups are often dock connector hookups, meaning the HU has the data connection to the iPod, and therefore often has interface info (track name, etc.) on its own display, on your dash.

  21. The Remote = Shuffle + Menu button = underwhelming by patiwat · · Score: 1

    The Remote is a disappointment. It's basically a Shuffle with a menu button. Doesn't have the touch-sensitive wheel that makes navigating through long lists of songs such a pleasure. Of course, I haven't tried it with Front Row yet, but I'm not really looking forward to it due to the clunkiness of the design.

  22. divx/xvid by Dster76 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes, but can I play xvid or divx encoded videos? You know, all the ones that I created from DVDs I own?

    1. Re:divx/xvid by the_rev_matt · · Score: 1

      "Learn how to use QuickTime 7 Pro to export your home movies to iTunes and sync them to your new iPod."

      If you've got video content in any format recognized by QT Pro, you're good to go.

      --
      this is getting old and so are you

      blog

    2. Re:divx/xvid by Dster76 · · Score: 0

      "If you've got video content in any format recognized by QT Pro, you're good to go."

      I guess 'good to go' = 'have $30 you don't want'

      Here's the pitch from the apple store.

      QuickTime 7 Pro for Windows

      With QuickTime 7 Pro, you can create stunning H.264 video and surround audio on your Windows PC. Capture audio for creating your own podcast or narration track. Edit movies with simple cut, copy, and paste commands, watch HD movies in full screen, and much more. Purchase now to receive your QuickTime 7 Pro registration code instantly via email. Please note: QuickTime 7 Pro for Windows works only with the free QuickTime 7 Player for Windows. Be sure you have installed QuickTime 7 for Windows before you enter your QuickTime 7 Pro registration code. Price: $29.99 Estimated Ship: Now

    3. Re:divx/xvid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus, the nerve of some companies to actually charge people for products! Charging for products and services is how we move out of Mom's basement, get a clue, dipshit!

    4. Re:divx/xvid by Dster76 · · Score: 0

      Hey - I don't mind paying for stuff. Heck, I do it all the time - even content! I guess I would be a little annoyed if I had a whole pile of videos which worked on my computer, bought a newfangled iPod video player, and found out that unless I paid ANOTHER $30 for some kind of 'pro' version of some software, I wouldn't be able to watch my videos on that machine.

  23. This is ridiculous by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is ridiculous. I'm sure I'm not the only one of the several thousands who must have submitted all the OTHER news:

    -iTunes 6
    -New iMac with built-in Firewire camera
    -New app called FrontRow for playing media from your sofa, 6 button iPod-like remote -compared to Microsoft Media Center's 40 buttons
    -New PhotoBooth app for taking pictures that actually uses iMac's screen as a flash
    -Television shows and music videos for sale through iTunes at $1.99.

    Etc....

    Instead, we get "Yeah, they mentioned iPod video today, and here's a lame car link. Disregard all the other news, like Apple taking Microsoft on directly in the living room..."

    --
    "Sufferin' succotash."
    1. Re:This is ridiculous by WozRus · · Score: 2, Informative

      One other thing worth mentioning is this spec on Apple's iMac tech specs page:

      ATI Radeon X600 Pro (17-inch model) or XT (20-inch model) graphics processor using PCI-Express

      AFAIK, this is the first Mac to use PCI-Express. Here's hoping the upcoming Power Macs will sport this as well.

      -W

    2. Re:This is ridiculous by seven+of+five · · Score: 3, Funny

      -New iMac with built-in Firewire camera

      finally, easy out-of-the-box setup for sexcam bunnies....

  24. When and Where can i BUY this ? EOM by managedcode · · Score: 1

    EOM

    1. Re:When and Where can i BUY this ? EOM by sho222 · · Score: 1

      When and Where can i BUY this ?

      Now. Here. EOM.

  25. 60GB -- 3 hours of video: Huh? by catmistake · · Score: 1

    I don't get it... why so little video capacity?

    In my world, 60GB is about 15 hours of DVD quality video... and at 320X240, the 60GB iPod should hold twice that... and with H.264, it should twice THAT... so, why isn't it 60 hours of video?

    1. Re:60GB -- 3 hours of video: Huh? by carmaggedon · · Score: 1

      apple store says 150 hours, not three.

    2. Re:60GB -- 3 hours of video: Huh? by zalas · · Score: 2, Informative

      According to the Apple Store, the iPod 30GB will support "Over 75 hours of video." The 60GB will support "Over 150 hours of video."

    3. Re:60GB -- 3 hours of video: Huh? by chris234 · · Score: 1

      Well, the Apple site says 150 hours of video (H.264, and I assume for the 60Gig unit). Where were you getting your number?

    4. Re:60GB -- 3 hours of video: Huh? by Brendor · · Score: 1

      According to their site it can store 150 hours of video (320x240 h.264)

    5. Re:60GB -- 3 hours of video: Huh? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      It's 150 hours of video. I don't know where you're getting 3 hours from.

      150 hours is pretty respectable.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    6. Re:60GB -- 3 hours of video: Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Holds over 1,000 (30GB) or 2,000 (60GB) videos(2)"

      The "3 hours of video playback" is based on battery life, not actual video storage space.

    7. Re:60GB -- 3 hours of video: Huh? by ponds · · Score: 1

      I think they're saying it has enough battery life to play 3 hours of video there, Archimedes.

    8. Re:60GB -- 3 hours of video: Huh? by stang7423 · · Score: 1

      Ummm... On the Apple site is says 150 Hours of Video right there on the front page. Encoded in H264 no doubt, but 150 hours none the less. No to shabby

    9. Re:60GB -- 3 hours of video: Huh? by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      Apple.com is touting 150 hours of video, I dunno where 3 hours comes from.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    10. Re:60GB -- 3 hours of video: Huh? by pmike_bauer · · Score: 3, Informative

      Its only 3 hours of batter life.

      --
      I read /. for the (Score:-1, Conservative) comments.
    11. Re:60GB -- 3 hours of video: Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "batter life"
      Quick, make the fritters now!

    12. Re:60GB -- 3 hours of video: Huh? by jeffehobbs · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...mmmm. Batter life.

    13. Re:60GB -- 3 hours of video: Huh? by dangitman · · Score: 1

      The batter life is the Good Life.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    14. Re:60GB -- 3 hours of video: Huh? by phonex98 · · Score: 1

      ACtually, according to the apple website, you get 2 hours of video and 3 hours of slideshow with music....

    15. Re:60GB -- 3 hours of video: Huh? by monopole · · Score: 1

      2 hours of battery life, nearly the same as a PSP with a better screen and a lower price tag. And miles behind the Game Boy DS w/ play yan with the same size screen, and a much cheaper price tag. And the video iPod will be considerably more fragile. Sure more space but what not time to watch it!

      Huh?

    16. Re:60GB -- 3 hours of video: Huh? by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      IIRC, PSP is bigger than the iPod. What what do you mean by "more fragile"? Aren't we talking about PSP here? The device that uses optical media, has a huge screen that just shouts "scratch me!", has dust under the screen and dead pixels....

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
  26. Alpine unit by jason.hall · · Score: 1

    I've used the Alpine connector since January, and like it. Just wish it didn't lock the iPod buttons - I can find a song using the ipod interface a lot faster than through the head unit. But the sound quality, and the ipod charging features are great.

  27. Religious Content Out Already by mydotnet · · Score: 1

    Brookside Baptist Church is announcing that they have adapted their sermons for the video iPod (http://www.brooksidebaptist.org/videoipod).

    1. Re:Religious Content Out Already by SwedeGeek · · Score: 1

      Ha! When I went to that page, I got a bunch of old folks in the the header image. I wonder how many of them have any idea what an iPod is, let alone that their church is going to have a videocast for download. What do you think they'd say if they knew what was going on behind closed doors at their quite, little Baptist church? I can see it now...

      "That Steve Jobs is the spawn of Satan with his evil little iPods! Burn them all!!"


      p.s.- You may have to refresh a few times to get a pic of Methuselah's siblings.

  28. And Pixar shorts by mcc · · Score: 1

    The apple website is only loading itermittently, but I'm pretty sure I saw on there that they have "for the birds".

    Something I'm seriously wondering about is, will we start to see tv companies doing video podcasts? Like, the daily show. They already put segments from their show up on their website as video. At this point it wouldn't be so surprising to see them start putting these into some kind of iPod-friendly format, or almost even just putting up entire episodes and financing this by leaving the commercials in.

    1. Re:And Pixar shorts by askegg · · Score: 1

      I think you may be right - vidcasts are on the way.

      --
      I don't make predictions, and I never will.
    2. Re:And Pixar shorts by ksheff · · Score: 1

      If this becomes popular, is Apple going to bundle some form of bittorrent into their video distribution system to help ease the bandwidth crunch?

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  29. Bugs on the site by rgarcia · · Score: 1

    apple.com is screwed up. I have never had a website crash both Firefox AND IE. Is this happening to anyone else?
    Have you clicked the "more features" link on the new iPod page or on the online store?
    Ironically, it seems to be a Quicktime plugin problem.

    --

    I couldn't fail to disagree with you less.

    1. Re:Bugs on the site by billybob · · Score: 1

      Yah it happened to me too... ever since I installed iTunes 5 which came with the final version of QT7. It's fucking really damn annoying. QT7 is horrible.

      --
      Joseph?
  30. No more eMacs by linguae · · Score: 4, Informative

    I noticed on Apple's page that the eMac is gone. It is no longer on Apple's hardware website (except under "eMac for Education"), and it is no longer sold at the Apple store.

    I guess the Mac Mini must have made the eMac a bit redundant, so sales of the eMac must have dropped tremendously.

    1. Re:No more eMacs by payndz · · Score: 1

      The eMac is still available on the UK Apple Store. I bought one last week (rather an a Mac Mini, since I didn't have a 'spare' monitor as I was upgrading from an iMac DV and I wanted the eMac's bigger HDD and faster video card) and so far it's been a delight. But if Apple are phasing it out, I guess I bought it at the right time!

      --
      You must think in Russian.
    2. Re:No more eMacs by MonoSynth · · Score: 1

      That means that Apple abandoned the CRT.... Are they the first to do this?

    3. Re:No more eMacs by tim1724 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      the eMac is still available for schools to buy, via the Apple Store for Education. (note that it's not available to students or teachers .. only to institutions.)

      Of course, the eMac started out as an education-only product, and it was only after several months of consumer demand that Apple made it available to individuals. I imagine it will stay around for a few more months for schools, and then quietly disappear for good this spring, with Apple telling schools to buy the mini and buy a CRT somewhere else.

      --
      -- Tim Buchheim
    4. Re:No more eMacs by chochos · · Score: 2, Funny

      So that's it? vi officially wins, at least on OS X?

    5. Re:No more eMacs by koko775 · · Score: 1

      You heard it here. viPod > eMacs.

  31. Of course you can by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't forget iMovie; Apple is big on people creating their own video.

    Looks like Handbrake just got a lot more popular.

    1. Re:Of course you can by FresnonserF · · Score: 1

      Apple missed the home video market by not including a built-in speaker in the video iPod. Without a speaker, it's impossible to share your movies with anyone else. Video content is usually more fun when you watch it with someone else.

  32. There. You happy? by MadChicken · · Score: 1

    I think Steve released a video-capable iPod to shut people the heck up.

    For that, thank you Steve.

    (P.S. Why not make all the new iPods the FrontRow remote?)

    --
    SYS 64738 NO CARRIER
    1. Re:There. You happy? by generic-man · · Score: 4, Informative

      All iPods with a Dock connector work with the FrontRow remote. All you need is their new "Universal Dock" with a remote receiver.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    2. Re:There. You happy? by nitehorse · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, no, no.

      That's not what he asked.

      The iPods may work with the remote, but the question is why can't they act as the remote?

      It's a good question. The iPods are already pretty close to a good remote interface. Add a new main menu item for 'Front Row' and let it control the iMac from there, or something.

      It's definitely an interesting idea.

    3. Re:There. You happy? by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Because the iPod has no wireless. Don't you remember that as one of the reasons why they were "lame" from day one? $30 for a remote matches Apple's usual accessory charge for an iPod gizmo anyway.

      --
      For more information, click here.
  33. Amazing... by NewbieV · · Score: 5, Interesting
    From the report in the New York Times:

    Citing a groundbreaking deal with ABC, owned by The Walt Disney Co., a longtime partner of chief executive Steve Jobs' Pixar Animation Studios Inc., Apple's online iTunes store will sell episodes of hit shows "Desperate Housewives" and "Lost" for $1.99 apiece, making them available the day after they air on television.
    Yes, it's a tiny video screen, but you can attach the iPod to a monitor using S-Video plus audio cabling. How can an organization like the RIAA justify wanting more than 99 cents per song when you can purchase 44 minutes of audio and video for two dollars?
    --


    "For every right, an equal responsibility..."
    1. Re:Amazing... by revscat · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's a tiny video screen, but you can attach the iPod to a monitor using S-Video plus audio cabling. How can an organization like the RIAA justify wanting more than 99 cents per song when you can purchase 44 minutes of audio and video for two dollars?

      Actually, that's a very good point, and one that may serve to undermine the RIAA's case. Very astute.

    2. Re:Amazing... by stubear · · Score: 1

      "How can an organization like the RIAA justify wanting more than 99 cents per song when you can purchase 44 minutes of audio and video for two dollars?"

      Easy, the market demand for music is going to be far higher and as long as we live in a capitalistic society the laws fo supply and demand are going to drive prices. Copyright infringement interrupts this flow and will ultimately have negative consequences for both the industry and the consumer.

    3. Re:Amazing... by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      How can an organization like the RIAA justify wanting more than 99 cents per song when you can purchase 44 minutes of audio and video for two dollars?
      Keep in mind that that $2 only gets you QVGA resolution. I'm willing to bet that DVD-quality (or even HD) will come later and cost more (e.g. $5 - $10 per episode).
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    4. Re:Amazing... by shark72 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "How can an organization like the RIAA justify wanting more than 99 cents per song when you can purchase 44 minutes of audio and video for two dollars?"

      Because people are buying millions and millions of them at $0.99. They have likely done the research to show that they'll sell millions at $1.49 as well.

      The fundamental thing here is value to the customer. It makes absolutely no difference what else is available for a similar price. If you want that CD for $13, you'll likely buy it despite the fact that a DVD costs $20 or a movie ticket costs $9 or a Urban Outfitters t-shirt costs $16 or a Jhane Barnes t-shirt costs $100 or a cheeseburger costs $4 or a concert ticket costs $40 -- because you want a CD, not a DVD, a cheeseburger or a t-shirt.

      Likewise, if you want a particular song, but you don't happen to want a particular episode of Lost, then the price of the two items relative to each other -- or the price of the item you want relative to anything else on the planet -- makes little difference.

      If anybody reading this is not a fan of the luxury of charging what the market will bear, then great -- figure out how much it would cost you to barely scrape by for a year without vacations or other discretionary spending, and then talk to your boss on Thursday about reducing your salary.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    5. Re:Amazing... by yabos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      THAT would be insane. To compete with piracy they're going to have to charge a lot less than $5-$10 per episode. I mean, you can download an HDTV quality TV show usually the day after it's on TV for free.

      Sometimes I HAVE to do this because there are 3 or 4 shows that I watch on at the same time. So I can't even watch them all, I have to download at least 2 of them otherwise I miss it.

    6. Re:Amazing... by hackstraw · · Score: 4, Interesting

      How can an organization like the RIAA justify wanting more than 99 cents per song when you can purchase 44 minutes of audio and video for two dollars?

      For one, the 44 minute program was pretty much paid for the night before by advertising dollars.

      But in general, I've noticed this trend as well. Compare the prices for the latest Led Zeppelin releases on CD and DVD. The DVD has about 2x the content (over 300 minutes vs an estimated 180 minutes) in 3 different sound encodings but the CD costs _more_.

      Link for DVD http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B000 08PX8P/qid=1129144470/sr=8-11/ref=pd_bbs_11/104-09 63173-9088738?v=glance&s=dvd&n=507846

      Link for CD http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B000 08OWZC/qid=1129144470/sr=8-12/ref=pd_bbs_12/104-09 63173-9088738?v=glance&s=music&n=507846

      Oh, people still buy the CDs at the higher prices or via iTunes. Now I know why they are more expensive.

    7. Re:Amazing... by Brock+Lee · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, it's a tiny video screen, but you can attach the iPod to a monitor using S-Video plus audio cabling.

      Sure, but realize that it won't increase the resolution beyond what is viewable on the iPod's display.

      How can an organization like the RIAA justify wanting more than 99 cents per song when you can purchase 44 minutes of audio and video for two dollars?

      The answer to that is simple. Music has high replayability. You can listen to a song hundreds of times over the course of a year. But video media, such as movies and television programs, loses its appeal very quickly. I find it difficult to watch most movies a second time, let alone a third or fourth.

      Plus, music is something you can listen to while doing other things, such as walking down the street or working on your computer. Videos are not well-suited to that, and that makes them somewhat less useful. Yes, sometimes less is more!

    8. Re:Amazing... by Itanshi · · Score: 1

      mm this is no good tho, most TV in say Japan is made at bottom dollar and put on tv in th enegative in hopes to gain back money in products and dvds sales or cd sales. How can this service help them? (otaku) speaking of which i heard the guy going to space will cosplay, that poste don here yet?

    9. Re:Amazing... by pdbogen · · Score: 1

      figure out how much it would cost you to barely scrape by for a year without vacations or other discretionary spending, and then talk to your boss on Thursday about reducing your salary

      That'd be approximately 6 dollars more per hour than I'm making now. Would you mind talking to my boss for me?

    10. Re:Amazing... by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      If anybody reading this is not a fan of the luxury of charging what the market will bear, then great -- figure out how much it would cost you to barely scrape by for a year without vacations or other discretionary spending, and then talk to your boss on Thursday about reducing your salary.

      I don't recall my salary being paid by the public, at the expense of one of their fundamental human rights. Sorry but copyright is a restriction of free speech that is supposed to be for the good of the people. The extremely long copyright lengths should not be determined by "what the market will bear" but by what is necessary to induce creations to be made, and that is a vital component of this equation you have overlooked. The cost of producing these shows is negligible compared to the cost charged customers. The last time I looked at the numbers, the production and distribution on DVD of every show on cable TV could be paid in full if each TV owner paid $7 a month. Music is much, much, much cheaper to produce and distribute. Both of these forms of media are then milked for decades despite having paid for themselves a thousand times over. This, in my opinion, is a travesty.

    11. Re:Amazing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Likewise, if you want a particular song, but you don't happen to want a particular episode of Lost, then the price of the two items relative to each other -- or the price of the item you want relative to anything else on the planet -- makes little difference.

      So what your saying is that intellectual property peddlers are solely in control of thier own personal monopolies. Hmmm I can't possibly imagine why there is so much tension between producers and consumers with regards to IP then....

    12. Re:Amazing... by Pascal+Sartoretti · · Score: 1

      How can an organization like the RIAA justify wanting more than 99 cents per song when you can purchase 44 minutes of audio and video for two dollars?

      Because people usually see a show once (maybe twice), but may listen to a song 100 times.

    13. Re:Amazing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gimme a break. You don't HAVE to watch 3-4 shows at a time.

    14. Re:Amazing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yes, it's a tiny video screen, but you can attach the iPod to a monitor using S-Video plus audio cabling.

      That's a composite cable (VCR cable), which is much worse than S-video (DVD player cable). 320x240 video through a composite cable will not look very good on a monitor.

    15. Re:Amazing... by vertinox · · Score: 1

      Plus, music is something you can listen to while doing other things, such as walking down the street or working on your computer. Videos are not well-suited to tha, and that makes them somewhat less useful.

      Unless, you are taking a bus or someone else is driving and or you've got a 15 minute break and you are just sitting a break room. I think this would be good for say downloading BBC news casts before you leave to work, but for watching Lord of the Rings while trying actually work may not be the best idea.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    16. Re:Amazing... by Aaron+England · · Score: 1

      You captured truth and insight so succintly, I'm shocked.

    17. Re:Amazing... by eMartin · · Score: 1

      "How can an organization like the RIAA justify wanting more than 99 cents per song when you can purchase 44 minutes of audio and video for two dollars?"

      I'm wondering the opposite.

      Music that I buy, I will probably listen to over and over for years to come, but as much as I like Lost, I'll probably only watch it once or twice. I think the TV shows should be less, especially, since I can get a much higher quality boxed set for less than what Apple is charging.

      At least Apple's music costs less than the CDs.

    18. Re:Amazing... by prockcore · · Score: 1

      How can an organization like the RIAA justify wanting more than 99 cents per song when you can purchase 44 minutes of audio and video for two dollars?

      How about the fact that those 44 minutes of audio and video were broadcast OTA last week for free? Plus the free version was better quality.

    19. Re:Amazing... by agraupe · · Score: 1

      Depends what kind of lunch break you've got, and if you mind breaking movie-watching up. I used to do this with my PocketPC (which, incedentally, supported a non-crappy codec and a better resolution), and it was no problem watching half a movie at lunch time.

    20. Re:Amazing... by agraupe · · Score: 1

      Thank you, semantics nazi. Anyway, sure you don't have to watch four at a time, but it sucks that networks tend to put their best programs up against one another. There's 5 days out of the week where I have no need to watch anything, and then all the good programming bunches up in two days all during the same two hours.

    21. Re:Amazing... by drsquare · · Score: 1

      How can an organization like the RIAA justify wanting more than 99 cents per song when you can purchase 44 minutes of audio and video for two dollars?

      They don't have to justify it. If you don't like the price, don't buy it. Music is a luxury item, they'll price it at the price that people are willing to pay. If people are willing to pay the same money for an album that they are a film on DVD, then they can get away with it.

    22. Re:Amazing... by azemon · · Score: 1

      Not that I am in support of charging $0.99 for a song... but my personal opinion is that an episode of Deperate Housewives has no value whatsoever so your comparison is specious.

      Now if I could get BBC's Coupling...

    23. Re:Amazing... by yabos · · Score: 1

      So, what do you do if you like to watch 4 shows and they are all on at the same time? huh? There's currently not much choice. I live in Canada and don't have Tivo because it's not offered here. Even if it was, my current TV provider doesn't support DVR type boxes so I would have to manually tune it through their set top box. Here's Thursday's example of 8:00 PM. Survivor, Joey, Smallville, The OC. Yeah, I watch all of those shows haha at me. AFAIK, Joey isn't aired any more than once per week, and neither is Survivor or the OC. Smallville is the exception, where it's show a few days later on a Canadian channel. So that's still 3 shows all at the same time for which there's not many options if you want to watch them all. No, I'm not buying 3 VCRs.

    24. Re:Amazing... by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Where do you buy your CDs?

      itunes is often more expensive than CDs.. which is why I refuse on principle to buy from it (it's mostly pure profit.. bandwidth is *much* cheaper than physical media production/distribution).

      eg. U2 'All that you can't leave Behind'. iTunes price £9.49 (~$17). Discount store price £8, and you get the physical media thrown in for free.

  34. iMac G5 has semi-sane prices by green+pizza · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think the coolest part are the somewhat reasonable prices on the new iMacs.

    For $1299 you get 17" LCD, built in good quality webcam, 1.9 GHz G5, 512 MB, 160 GB, dual layer slot load DVD writer, Radeon X600 Pro, 802.11g, bluetooth, a wired funky MightyMouse, a remote control, and a bunch of preinstalled software.

    1. Re:iMac G5 has semi-sane prices by Veilrap · · Score: 1

      Or you could buy high powered PC laptop for the same price...

    2. Re:iMac G5 has semi-sane prices by FrkyD · · Score: 1

      Yep. It would probably weigh the same too. ;)

  35. but what color is the new iTunes note? by godawful · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    augh, _still_ green, how many version till we get a new color?

    --
    Live EVERY week... Like it's Shark Week
  36. 320x240 = crap by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

    The video quality is crap. The darknet provides much higher quality versions of TV shows.

  37. With such a small screen... by Karma_fucker_sucker · · Score: 1
    wouldn't you just see the "parts" going at it?

    Then again, I'm sure there's plenty of people who'd really love that. Actually, well, ummm,....Great Idea!!!!

    --
    Evil people don't think they're evil. - George Lucas, Making of Ep III
    1. Re:With such a small screen... by Karma_fucker_sucker · · Score: 0

      You're marked as "Flamebait". Oooo, flaming dicks and pussies! Hmmm, that would be a nihe in the pr0n niz!

      --
      Evil people don't think they're evil. - George Lucas, Making of Ep III
    2. Re:With such a small screen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When first trying out iriverter (which automagically converts ~any video to iRiver-compatible format/resolution/framerate), I used it on a smaller video first. Surprisingly enough, the only videos I had shorter than an hour or so were pron, so a short clip of lesbianism found it's way on there.

      It was perfectly fine on that. I expect iPod video would be comparable.

    3. Re:With such a small screen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've loaded porn on my Archos MM20, and it works ok. Obviously not as good as a laptop, but it's harder to sneak a laptop in your pocket on the way to the restroom...

  38. WOW... by mastmallu · · Score: 1

    man thatz gud, i can't wait to get my handz on 1

  39. No Divx...No Problem by BancBoy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My PSP doesn't play Divx (or XVID, or WMV, etc.) But that doesn't stop me from watching a lot of my weekly video content on it. With an app like PSPWare to do the conversion from a myriad of formats to the quality setting of my choice, I don't have a problem. As the iPod with Video plays H.264 and MPEG4, I would imagine a similiar application will work just fine to do the conversion and loading for you.

    --
    [UID-HeinzIntel]
    1. Re:No Divx...No Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Playing movies is just one function of the PSP. You need a different app to watch other content on your PSP. So which side are you taking to the parents question? Will it sell as is with non Apple approved/provided content or do you think it will take other possible unapproved tricks to be acceptable to many people?

    2. Re:No Divx...No Problem by BancBoy · · Score: 1
      Playing video is one of the functions of the PSP. Whether I am watching a movie, or an episode of a TV show, or a music video doesn't really matter. I happen to do all of the above. The source material is a mix of DVDs, XVID, Divx, MPEG1,2,4, WMV, etc. Sony's own software for converting your own videos is shite. Not a problem, PSPWare does just fine. Shareware saves the day.

      I'm sure if Apple decides not to provide the tools required (at the risk of raising the tempers of the studios/networks/record labels/etc) and there are Shareware or Freeware alternatives it will work just fine.

      --
      [UID-HeinzIntel]
    3. Re:No Divx...No Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Converting video to PSP format is a pain in the ass, though. It's something that Joe Schmoe doesn't want to have to do. That is why UMD video sales are sky high (certainly a whole lot better than PSP games at least).

    4. Re:No Divx...No Problem by CronoCloud · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ffmpeg -y -i foo.mpg -title "foo" -bitexact -vcodec xvid -s 320x240 -r 29.97 -b 1500 -acodec aac -ac 2 -ar 24000 -ab 64 -f psp -muxvb 768
      M4V80113.mp4

      finding out the command line sequence for ffmpeg was easier (for me) than trying to figure out some of those PSP video conversion tools out there. Most of which use ffmpeg as their backend.

  40. iPod in a car -- asking for failures. by JonTurner · · Score: 1

    How does the iPod hold up with sub-freezing -> 130+ degree F temperatures? I live in a state that routinely sees 110 degree days in the summer (130 is not surprising inside a closed automobile) and single-digit days in the winter. According to Apple, the iPod Operating temperature: 32 to 95 F (0 to 35 C); Non operating temperature: -4 to 113 F (-20 to 45 C)

    Considering the iPod keeps a record of maximum and minimum temperatures, if you exceed either of these and experience a HDD or battery failure I'm wondering whether you'll eat the costs of replacement.

    IOW, remove the iPod each time you leave the vehicle and take it with, or you risk serious damage.

    Now, if I could get an iPod that communicates with the car via bluetooth that'd be ideal -- I wouldn't have to remember to plug the thing in every time I wanted to use it/remove it every time I leave the vehicle; Just keep it in my briefcase or jacket pocket and everything works.

    1. Re:iPod in a car -- asking for failures. by nuggetman · · Score: 1

      Considering the iPod keeps a record of maximum and minimum temperatures, if you exceed either of these and experience a HDD or battery failure I'm wondering whether you'll eat the costs of replacement.


      Any source for this tidbit?

      --
      ...and that's all there is to it.
  41. C'mon... say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Say it with me now...

    iPorn.

    1. Re:C'mon... say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no, iPud.

  42. Shortest CNN article ever by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 1

    ahref=http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/ptech/10/12/app le.video.ipod.ap/index.htmlrel=url2html-3093http:/ /www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/ptech/10/12/apple.video.ipo d.ap/index.html>
    Yeah, it was exactly 2 sentences when I first read it. Not really informative, I just found it funny that we got more ads then story on that page.

    1. Re:Shortest CNN article ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Folks, this is why there is a preview button.

  43. Coming to a car near you, but dont watch & dri by digitaldc · · Score: 1

    iPod video and driving may be hazardous to your health.

    From the article:
    Prices Rise
    The player is helping to drive sales of Apple's more- profitable Mac personal computers. Mac shipments reached a five- year high of 1.24 million units, the fourth straight quarter shipments have topped 1 million machines, Apple said yesterday.
    Interesting!

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  44. No FireWire? by kerry-buckley · · Score: 1

    Looking at the new iPod's specs, it seems that only USB (2.0, unless you're really patient) is supported, meaning that no current-model iPods now have a FireWire interface.

    1. Re:No FireWire? by ddp337 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I noticed the same thing. Loading my 512K shuffle via USB2.0 already seems to take a lifetime, now they want to transfer video?!?! Loading a TV show onto the iPod will take just as long as watching it!

    2. Re:No FireWire? by despik · · Score: 1

      Do you realize that the shuffle is flash-based, and that writing to flash chips is much slower to HDs?

      --
      "I seem to have mastered a certain amount of control over physical reality."
  45. Missing the BIG news by almostmanda · · Score: 1

    Come on, guys. We all knew the iPod video was coming, and all of that junk. The BIG news here is TV episodes in the ITMS--finally, a legit (and not ungodly pricey) alternative to torrenting shows I miss. Granted, right now it is only five shows, but if this takes off (and I am guessing it will--people over 20 care about tv shows a lot more than music videos) then we can expect digital distribution of tv shows to become the norm.

    I still cannot understand why the basic networks have yet to start doing this. Why NOT put tv shows online, perhaps with commercials added in? They broadcast them out to the world anyways, so anyone with a TV can recieve them, so why not anyone with an internet connection? DRM it if you need to, just make it easier for me to access. Live in the nows.

    1. Re:Missing the BIG news by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
      No kidding. I don't even pay for cable, no way am I shelling out for a Tivo + subscription. But $2 an episode? I might drop that here and there. I like TV more than my husband, so we don't watch it much/at all when he's home (prime time) - now if I have some time during the day I can check out new shows I don't have a chance to watch in the evenings.

      I'm wondering what their full-season pricing will be (you know it's coming, like album pricing). How much cheaper than the DVD?

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    2. Re:Missing the BIG news by numbski · · Score: 1

      I like TV more than my husband

      I know I'm tired and all, but it took me reading that 3 times to realize that you weren't saying that your television was more valued than your husband...

      Reminds me of my wife though. ;) She enjoys tv, I really don't. Had to doubletake to make sure your handle wasn't "Baroque". :P

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

  46. P.S. Avalon versus Quartz by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Don't forget the best reason to use iTunes 6--they softened the sharp window corners. :)

    Seriously though, they smoothed out the sharp corners of the whole interface. It was actually bugging me in version 5, as trivial as that is. I didn't like the really sharp corners at all, and I know a lot of people were complaining about that. When you're using an app all the time like iTunes, it helps to have it look and feel nice.

    --
    "Sufferin' succotash."
    1. Re:P.S. Avalon versus Quartz by rocjoe71 · · Score: 1

      ...Because the music sounds better with round corners?

      --
      Height: 38U, Weight: 0 Newtons, Eyes: #0000FF, OS: Gray Matter 1.0 (Alpha)
    2. Re:P.S. Avalon versus Quartz by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      Well, no, but my eyes "feel" better...

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    3. Re:P.S. Avalon versus Quartz by Clockwurk · · Score: 0, Redundant

      haha, I knew I wasn't the only one annoyed by the chamferred corners.

    4. Re:P.S. Avalon versus Quartz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You brute! You brute! You horrible brute!

    5. Re:P.S. Avalon versus Quartz by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      You're *obviously* not an audiophile, are you? Now excuse my while I go plug in my stereo with this new $1,500 power cord.

    6. Re:P.S. Avalon versus Quartz by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 0

      But at least your power chords will sound better.

      (Sorry. Couldn't resist.)

    7. Re:P.S. Avalon versus Quartz by Chuqmystr · · Score: 1

      OK, great,they fixed how it looks but how about the way it works? 5.x had some nasty problems that made me wish I stayed on 4.x and made my 2 year old G3 iBook really show it's age. Guess my cheap ass needs to pony up for a new one *sigh*... 5 even seemed like kind of a hog on the G4 desktop. Never bothered to top on it or anything but it certainly seemed much slower at many things and some crashing now and again too. Guess I'll find out tonight...

    8. Re:P.S. Avalon versus Quartz by kzinti · · Score: 1

      Mine was one of those machines on which iTunes 5.0 and 5.0.1 refused to recognize the CD burner (Plextor PX716). I'm happy to report that 6.0 once again recognizes my CD burner; I haven't actually burned a disc yet, but the fact that it sees the burner is promising.

    9. Re:P.S. Avalon versus Quartz by ta+ma+de · · Score: 1

      I still think the corners are too sharp. I like the round-over in 4.9 much better. I think the location of the volume slider creates a visual disjointedness. I wish they had brought back the 4.9 look.

    10. Re:P.S. Avalon versus Quartz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You make it sound like it's a flawless program, well not on windows its not, every time I start it up I get a message error complaining about "other CD burning software" that I have installed -- Nero is actually a popular program for recording CDs, can't explain that bug... can't turn that feature off either...

      For some reason it starts up when ever I run ipodder, can't turn that off either.

    11. Re:P.S. Avalon versus Quartz by fbg111 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, I noticed too and wandered if Apple was uncharacteristically drifting away from their roots.

      --
      Flying is easy, just throw yourself at the ground and miss. -Douglas Adams
    12. Re:P.S. Avalon versus Quartz by browncs · · Score: 1

      I wish I had like a zillion mod points to give you, Mr. "evolution would be so proud".

      One of the best crafted posts I've ever seen.

      It sparkled like a jewel in a pool of crap.

      Congrats.

  47. Powerbooks? PowerMacs? by wandazulu · · Score: 1

    Can't wait to get my hands on the new iPod. New iMac looks sweet. Downloading iTunes 6 now.

    That said...

    Where are the powermacs and powerbooks I'd heard were going to be announced? If I'm going to be making content for the new iPod, what better than on a quad-processor G5? Or a dual procesor powerbook?

    1. Re:Powerbooks? PowerMacs? by bnenning · · Score: 1

      Where are the powermacs and powerbooks I'd heard were going to be announced?

      Power Macs will get a stealth upgrade in a few weeks with DDR2 and PCIe. Steve isn't going to make a big deal out of any pro Macs until the Intel switch.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
  48. The TV thing by Solr_Flare · · Score: 1

    Is going to be a real selling point and is a brilliant idea that will likely attract a lot more stations.

    I mean think about it. Season X DVDs of TV shows are already imensely popular. At 2$ a show the TV companies are making about the same profit as they would off selling an entire DVD season, consumers get their shows right then and there, and apple makes a profit from the sales.

    While I certainly agree that the Ipod is still not the ideal video display device, this is an excellent additional feature to an already well designed mp3 player. Now if we can just get support for more MP3 formats and maybe a built in FM tuner, Apple would hold all the cards over any of their competitors.

    --
    You are who you are, let no one tell you different. But, never close your mind to a new point of view.
    1. Re:The TV thing by sg3000 · · Score: 1

      > Season X DVDs of TV shows are already imensely popular.

      That's the killer app right there. The studios are making a lot of money from putting out old shows on DVD, but I suspect they would sell even better if you could buy one or two episodes, rather than an entire season. Few will want to buy Season 1 of Sanford and Son as a joke, but they might buy a single episode or two. It'll be very useful for shows like the Simpsons where last three or four seasons have been awful (unlike earlier, when every episode was gold), with maybe a single good episode or two.

      I think selling TV show episodes on iTunes is going to be big.

      --
      Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
  49. Ha - I beat slashdots's announcement by invasifspecies · · Score: 0

    Ha - I beat slashdots's announcement.

    Course, I had to do it in a post that was wildly off topic.

    http://interviews.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=165 075&cid=13775003

    Personally I was hoping for a G5 laptop.... er... oh, oh..... I know..... its a waterproof floating G5 powerbook you can use in the bath, in fact, to deal with the cooling issues, you can ONLY use it in the bath. The great part is that it keeps the water nice and warm. Instead of the bubble sound for a system alert, it would just blow a few bubbles, then look embarrassed.

  50. Buffalo bagels. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The video they're offering is 320x240 to match the resolution of the Video iPods. A typical TV show takes 10-20 minutes to download from the iTunes Music & Video Store.

    I don't see too many people lining up to download episodes of "That's So Raven" at $1.99 a pop, but mayve that's just me.

  51. Re:The Remote = Shuffle + Menu button = underwhelm by green+pizza · · Score: 1

    The Remote is a disappointment. It's basically a Shuffle with a menu button. Doesn't have the touch-sensitive wheel that makes navigating through long lists of songs such a pleasure. Of course, I haven't tried it with Front Row yet, but I'm not really looking forward to it due to the clunkiness of the design.

    First of all, to be clear, you are talking about the remote that comes bundled with the iMac, right?

    You do realize that a whole bunch of people complain about the touch-sensitive iPod click wheel? I think it's sort of a 50/50 split, some people love the iPod interface, some people totally hate it.

  52. No powerbook upgrades?!!!! by Danathar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So far I feel like I've ben gut punched....NO powerbook upgrades? I don't give a rats ass about watching music videos on a 320x200 screen for 2 bucks each! Apple! PLEASE! Do something with the powerbooks!

    1. Re:No powerbook upgrades?!!!! by Elfboy · · Score: 1

      nor any tower updates....

      c'mon apple.... what about the video/3d/sci users who are desperate for new machines...

      and before people cry 'wait for mactel'... towers are the last scheduled updates/transfers, way off at the end of '07 iirc.. that's two years away.

      --
      * We dance where angels fear to tread *
    2. Re:No powerbook upgrades?!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      man- powerbooks don't get upgraded and you feel like you've "ben gut punched"? i'd suggest re-evaluating life priorities if you find the lack of a powerbook upgrade to be so damaging.

    3. Re:No powerbook upgrades?!!!! by Danathar · · Score: 1

      Ok...I lied...but you responded! Nobody pays attention anymore unless you post something strange.

      Even so, I've been waiting on the purchase of a powerbook anticipating at the very least an upgrade in the memory bandwidth (DDR2 please!). That would zip up the powerbooks just a tad.

      oh well.

    4. Re:No powerbook upgrades?!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the thing is apple doesn't really care about computers anymore. They care about ipods. And more importantly, making crazy $$$ off of the ITMS.

    5. Re:No powerbook upgrades?!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are doing something: They're seriously ignoring them

    6. Re:No powerbook upgrades?!!!! by n8_f · · Score: 1
      That would zip up the powerbooks just a tad.

      No, I don't think it would. The G4s are frontside bus bandwidth constrained, not memory bus bandwidth constrained. The higher latencies in DDR2 could actually slow things down, although that is probably irrelevant if your memory controller runs 5 cycles in the time your frontside bus does one. The only win would be if DDR2 is more battery efficient (probably, but I don't know) and you could get an extra 1% of battery life. Otherwise, there are hopefully some component upgrades like a slightly faster processor that is more battery efficient, 7200RPM HD, better video card, higher-rez screen, etc. that they could bump. But the G4 is pretty much at the end of what you can do to squeeze out any more performance.

      Apple would love to release PowerBooks, although not at this event. This was all about video and the start of their campaign to win the living room (Frontshow on Mac mini - 'nuff said). They will be updating PowerMacs within the week (maybe a bit longer) to catch them up to the now better-spec'd iMacs and if they don't release PowerBooks then, it is simply because they can't. They could be selling a ton more if they were competitive, which is what will happen next year (compatible won't hurt, either).

    7. Re:No powerbook upgrades?!!!! by saj_s · · Score: 2, Informative

      >> Apple! PLEASE! Do something with the powerbooks!

      They are doing something; they're switching to x86 next year.

    8. Re:No powerbook upgrades?!!!! by toddestan · · Score: 1

      They are doing something; they're switching to x86 next year.

      Which means you might as well buy a Pentium M laptop right now for half the cost!

    9. Re:No powerbook upgrades?!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Except (1) it won't run Mac OS X, and (2) it won't be a Powerbook.

      You do realize that there's more to a computer than which company manufactured the microchip, right?

    10. Re:No powerbook upgrades?!!!! by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      Soon. This was consumer-oriented event, not Pro-oriented. Upgraded PB's and PM's will follow up shortly.

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
  53. I think I'll buy the Archos AV-700 instead... by TheRealStyro · · Score: 0

    I like the fact that Apple has a deal going with one broadcast network, but I can't get over a 2.5" display. That will seriously hinder the usefulness to the over 30 market. I'm only 38 but I don't want to squint while watching shows, nor have to buy a third-party lens (anybody remember the first GBA?).

    If I want portable media I'll buy an Archos AV-700 or just stick with my laptop. The Archos has a 7" screen and the laptop has a 15.4". Both have more than enough space for my iTunes collection and select DVDs.

    --
  54. More interested in FrontRow by Zed2K · · Score: 1

    What are the capabilities of it? Does it support menu and dvd navigation from ripped dvd's? Can it play ISO images of dvd's stored on an external drive? Is it the first part of a mac based dvd jukebox device?

    1. Re:More interested in FrontRow by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      What are the capabilities of it? Does it support menu and dvd navigation from ripped dvd's? Can it play ISO images of dvd's stored on an external drive? Is it the first part of a mac based dvd jukebox device?

      The details are pretty sketchy. It can play DVDs in the drive, free mpeg-4 files from apple's database (this is movie trailers right now), music, DRM'ed video, and it says, 'home movies" which may be the one you are looking for, although it does not say what formats, etc. Personally, I'm more interested in watching TV recordings I grab from cable and have stored if the UI and remote are nice enough. I already have an old mac serving as a PVR, media jukebox and this might make it much nicer.

    2. Re:More interested in FrontRow by aftk2 · · Score: 1

      You might find this tour informative. Looks pretty good, although it's too bad it doesn't look like you can control Party Shuffle from it, which seems like a no-brainer (although, I guess Party Shuffle implies interactivity, as in moving items around, so maybe that's why it seems absent.) Still, looks super slick.

      --
      concrete5: a cms made for marketing, but strong enough for geeks.
    3. Re:More interested in FrontRow by mr100percent · · Score: 1
      It kinda reminds me of the Center Stage Project, which was an Open Source app designed for the Mini with the same features.


  55. favourite gripe ... by the+bluebrain · · Score: 2, Interesting

    On a music iPod you only need the screen for navigating. On a video iPod the screen is used to watch stuff.
     
    Can anybody tell me why 60% of the device's front-side real estate is white plastic?

    --
    yes, we have no bananas
    1. Re:favourite gripe ... by TylerL82 · · Score: 1

      Can anybody tell me why 60% of the device's front-side real estate is white plastic?

      Because you didn't buy the black model.

    2. Re:favourite gripe ... by christ0pher · · Score: 1

      oh, to have mod points. Thank you, I needed to laugh

    3. Re:favourite gripe ... by drsquare · · Score: 1

      A bigger screen means more expensive, shorter battery life, more easily scratched or broken (this is Apple after all), and more fingerprints on the screen. It will probably be bigger as well, no doubt the innards are packed into that thing, a bigger screen would mean the case would have to be thicker.

    4. Re:favourite gripe ... by the+bluebrain · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I can see the technical side of the issue.

      A thought: AFAIR, Apple issued their stuff in the following sequence:
      - iTunes
      - the iPod
      - iTMS
      - the video iPod

      The iPod had to stand on its own merits, iTunes being the only bonus in comparison with other MP3 players - and at the time, that was a big unknown.
      The video iPod, however, looks to me like an attempt at a stong argument to get users to use iTMS more - but it doesn't have to stand on its own merits. There will be plenty of people saying "I'd get an Archos XYZ - if only it were supported by iTunes / iTMS".
      It's just not the same killer device the original iPod was. Once they get a real-estate-filling OLED display, fine, but until then it's a disappointingly un-Apple-like compromise.

      --
      yes, we have no bananas
  56. Didn't Apple used to be a computer company? by reptilicus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Okay, the new iPods and such are nice, and you should understand that I'm a bit biased, as I'm typing this on a 500 Mhz TiBook that desperately needs replacing:

    Where are the upgraded PowerBooks and PowerMacs? We seem to get a new iPod model every two weeks, but no new PowerBooks for over 10 months?

    Grrrrrrr!

    1. Re:Didn't Apple used to be a computer company? by Surt · · Score: 0

      Well, they are in the middle of a massive shift to intel x86 based processors. That might have something to do with it.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    2. Re:Didn't Apple used to be a computer company? by interiot · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Apple is making tons of money on iPod, because they're apparently better than anyone else at making MP3 players that people want.

      Making laptops that are better than the competition? Certainly there are a number of people who feel that way, but Apple isn't such a far-and-away leader at laptops as they are at iPods. So it makes sense they should spend more time developing new iPods. (from an "invisible hand" kind of perspective)

      (furthermore, since they're the market leader at mp3 players, and it's not hard for other companies to emulate Apple, it's imperative that they capitalize on this lead right now and solidify themselves as a solid, long-term leader)

    3. Re:Didn't Apple used to be a computer company? by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
      Well, that seems to be why they're switching to Intel - the nonexistence of G5 PowerBooks, etc etc.

      To be fair, they did update the iMac, adding in iSight, a remote, and new software - but for some reason, the person who submitted this story ignored everything released today except the video iPod.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    4. Re:Didn't Apple used to be a computer company? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're complaining because of "no new PowerBooks for over 10 months", and you're typing the post on a computer that's considerably older than ten months. Why are you complaining, you've passed up, what, five or six product revisions in that lineup alone by your own choice so far? Are you waiting for the next new new thing because certainly it'll be shiner than that old and busted new new thing? ;)

    5. Re:Didn't Apple used to be a computer company? by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      You might want to check out the new iMac G5, they added some seriously interesting features that weren't covered in the slashdot blurb. You can buy them today if you'd like, just head on over to apple's page....though a lot of people do share your pain about no new portables...

    6. Re:Didn't Apple used to be a computer company? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was covered six months ago. There will be no PowerBook or iBook updates until next summer, when the Pentium M-based laptops hit the street.

      Why are you surprised? Have you not been paying attention? Why are you bitching about low-power G5s when you know damn well that there are no such things?

      Why, in short, are you being a cock?

    7. Re:Didn't Apple used to be a computer company? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      See here. Apple are, and always have been a consumer electronics company - it's just that some of their consumer electronics devices look like general purpose computers.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  57. A historic day. by LordSnooty · · Score: 1

    This is excellent, a very important day in the history of TV on both sides of the Atlantic. But how open can it be made? Can we get our own stuff on there? Once again we hope that the community can come up with a magical solution.

  58. American auto makers? by SleezyG · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I just took a look at the iPodYourCar page. It's really a shame that not a single American auto manufacturer is in that list. I think it's also an indicator of just how bad American cars are and how distant their products are from what consumers want.

    1. Re:American auto makers? by Burz · · Score: 1

      I know. The stupidity is scary.

  59. Obligatory by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 0

    No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
    1. Re:Obligatory by heeeraldo · · Score: 1

      but there is wireless*, and it's got way more space than the nomad. *the new docks have an IR port for a remote.

  60. Who cares about the video store? by sulli · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As long as I can put my own videos (e.g. recorded with a TV capture card) on the iPod, this is awesome. If it's for the store only, forget it.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
    1. Re:Who cares about the video store? by goodbadorugly · · Score: 2, Informative

      The front page of apple.com specifically has the words "home movies" So it looks like you'll be able to put all you want on this baby (probably as long as its encoded in quicktime)

    2. Re:Who cares about the video store? by Kesh · · Score: 1

      Looks like, so long as you use either H.264 or MPEG-4 (at the proper bitrates & resolution), you can put whatever videos you want into iTunes and play them on the iPod.

      I think it's time for me to download a decent DVD ripper again.

    3. Re:Who cares about the video store? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or subscribe to a decent .. um .. video content website.

    4. Re:Who cares about the video store? by Fahrvergnuugen · · Score: 2, Informative

      Quicktime 7.0.3 (released yesterday) has a preset for encoding video for iPods.

      --
      Kiteboarding Gear Mention slashdot and get 10% off!
  61. It's 150 hours of video by reptilicus · · Score: 1

    At least according to Apple's page:

    Holds up to 150 hours of video.

    Video capacity is based on 4 minutes per H.264 750-Kbps video combined with 128-Kbps audio.

  62. You know what's even better about this news? by Chyeld · · Score: 1

    Lets see the music industry try to squeeze Apple now. They are no longer the only content providers for iTMS. There is no chance of Apple caving in now. Especially with the price points they are setting for the vidoes.

  63. 1984 by 101percent · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Does anyone else see the camera in the imac as a little bit like 1984?

    1. Re:1984 by dave1212 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it seems as though there's no way to close the iris, you can only 'trust' the small LED to tell you when it's in operation. That.. seems kind of lame.

  64. If only... by CharAznable · · Score: 1

    I could buy Doctor Who episodes on iTunes... BBC, are you listening?

    --
    The perfect sig is a lot like silence, only louder
  65. check my post by COMON$ · · Score: 1

    Check my post out from the last Ipod statement here. Apple sure moves fast to my requests.

    --
    CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
  66. Purchase Music Video? by camcorder · · Score: 1

    Aren't they supposed to be intended to advertise albums? Why they are free (and even labels pay in order them to be broadcasted) on MTV but not on iPod?

    1. Re:Purchase Music Video? by Rob_Warwick · · Score: 1
      If MTV plays that song you like once a week, you want the song.

      If you have the video, which you can play and listen to the song on, or just rip the audio off, you have the song. You do not want the song anymore.

      Maybe videos should be priced the same as songs?

  67. So many cars by Rac3r5 · · Score: 1

    but not a single GM car.. no wonder they are loosing money... the are out of the loop...

  68. What's that sound? by supabeast! · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else hear the crying of all the morons who dumped their Apple stock yesterday because earnings only quadrupled?

  69. Ferrarri!!! Yay!! by mbadolato · · Score: 1

    Apple has just updated their iPodYourCar page to include a slew of new car companies

    I'm so happy Ferrari is listed on that page (albeit with "Coming Soon"). I was so worried that the SDC's (Small Dick Compensators) weren't able to have native iPod integration.

    Actually quite a few if the companies listed on that page cater to SDCs. They should subtely rub it in by only allowing integration with iPod Nanos.

  70. Free Magnifying Glass? by MrSteveSD · · Score: 1

    The screen is only 2.5 inches! I hope they are going to supply a free magnifying glass in the pack.

    My PSP has a superb 4.2 inch widescreen screen. I could never downgrade to 2.5 inches. Granted there's no Hard Drive, but I can just copy a few episodes of Farscape onto a 1GB memory stick ready for the morning commute.

    Of course, none of these video devices ever seem to support the formats you want. Either it doesn't support AC3 sound, or it doesn't support Div3.11 or a dozen other problems. You have to re-encode what you want to watch, particularly with the PSP, which is pretty proprietary.

    If you want a portable video player, I would recomend the PSP for its lovely screen. But if you really need to store tens of gigabytes of video, go for the Archos AV500. The screen is only a little bit smaller and it has a lot of video features the PSP doesn't.

    (The Creative Zen Vision looks interesting with its high res 640x480 screen, but its not a widescreen, which is a no-no for me)

    1. Re:Free Magnifying Glass? by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Checking video formats:

      iPod: H.264 video: up to 768 Kbps, 320 x 240, 30 frames per sec., Baseline Profile up to Level 1.3 with AAC-LC up to 160 Kbps, 48 Khz, stereo audio in .m4v, .mp4 and .mov file formats
      MPEG-4 video: up to 2.5 mbps, 480 x 480, 30 frames per sec., Simple Profile with AAC-LC up to 160 Kbps, 48 Khz, stereo audio in .m4v, .mp4 and .mov file formats

      PSP (with 2.foo)
        MPEG4 SP and MPEG4 AVC/H.264

      And guess which PC software plays PSP formatted video with no trouble at all....Quicktime. I'd lay odds that you can take your PSP formatted video and play them on the iPod. And it might work the other way too, at least for non DRM'd video. And one guess as to the name of the portable game/music/video playing machine that is the only other device that can play non DRM'd AAC audio created with iTunes.

      How long do you think it will take Sony to get TV episodes on Connect. (and why haven't they done it already)

  71. Firefox users! by vena · · Score: 1

    do not install the new iTunes 6 + Quicktime - the quicktime plugin crashes the browser when it tries to display in-line quicktime. i've tried this on four different computers with the same result trying to play the new iPod video off Apple's site.

  72. Very interesting by spewey · · Score: 1

    I am looking forward to watching video on my iPod Shuffle.

    1. Re:Very interesting by mpathetiq · · Score: 1

      Haha. Thanks for the giggles. Luckily all the bosses have left so I didn't get any strange looks.

  73. Non scarch screens by Daveznet · · Score: 1

    Lets hope apple makes sure their screens a a little more scratch resistant with these video ipods than they were with the nano. My nano is is just over a month old and its scratched to hell just from keeping it in my pocket. I would ahte to have a video ipod and not be able to watch the video cause the screen is scratched. Atleast I can still listen to music on my nano!

    --
    GL HF!
  74. Burn video's to DVD? by tyler083 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone know if iTunes will now burn your video files you buy onto a DVD that will play in a standard DVD player?

    If i buy every episode of a tv show, I may want to burn them to a dvd to watch when someone else is using the computer. or if i'd rather watch it on my huge 40 inch plasma tv (if I had one).

    1. Re:Burn video's to DVD? by mh101 · · Score: 1

      No. Steve said in the presentation that the videos cannot be burned to disc. Maybe the restrictions will be loosened in the future.

      --
      Duct tape is like the Force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the universe together.
    2. Re:Burn video's to DVD? by dave1212 · · Score: 1

      It was part of Steve's speech; he said no cd or dvd burning with the video files.

      I assume that means Apple expects everyone to have more than one hard drive now. Not unreasonable I guess, but they're going to have to make it more clear.

  75. 2 questions by Spytap · · Score: 1

    1. How does this affect streaming, i.e I can stream music, can I stream video?
    2. When does the airport express come out that enables me to watch downloaded videos on my TV?

  76. Re:Finally... there *are* TV shows available by enrico_suave · · Score: 4, Informative

    ABC has LOST and Desperate Housewives up for $1.99 in itunes right now...

    see flickr photo of LOST page

    i mean it'll have to be a much more extensive library, but it is an interesting baby step in the right direction... (that is till we find out the DRM times out/expires or something... wondering what I'm *buying* for $1.99 exactly)

    e.

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  77. Re:60GB -- 3 hours of video: Huh?--- oops by catmistake · · Score: 1

    Its 3 hours of battery life... I was looking in Tech Specs in the wrong place... Thanks, gang!

  78. New ipod by Coleco · · Score: 1

    Apple store is updated:

    http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects/A ppleStore.woa/72402/wo/k67XqgsiIPmx2rSBFFfYAA1SdhK /1.SLID?nclm=iPod&mco=CC4D3CBB

    It looks sweet but I wonder if it's as scratch-tastic as the nano.

    I think I'll hold off on buying one until that issue is resolved.

  79. Tech can't be replaced by boomi · · Score: 1

    Cool. Now we can pay for our music commercials, in QVGA resolution with DRM I'd wager.

    If you're pushing softcore MTV, why not go all the way? Oh well, I guess that didn't mix with the ipod's white image. But hardcore content will soon be available on the nano from the dark side.

  80. since the fairplay aac by KillShill · · Score: 1

    music files were "easy to circumvent" the DRM by burning them to cd...

    can you do the same with these video files?

    --
    Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
  81. MPEG4 supported - OK, but which MPEG4? by Damek · · Score: 1

    I'm assuming it's Apple's MPEG4, but it'd be neat if it could playback other MPEG4 formats like xvid, divx, etc. Pretty much no chance of that, though, I suppose. Too bad, means I'll probably have to go about converting or re-encoding a bunch of video. Because, yes, I want one of these babies (and iMac or Mac Mini with Front Row) within the next year or so.

    1. Re:MPEG4 supported - OK, but which MPEG4? by TylerL82 · · Score: 1

      If the content you have complies to MPEG-4 Simple Profile (and is 480x480 or below), you'd only have to reencode the audio and slap it all into an MP4 container. ...and I doubt most peoples' DivX content is all 480x480 or below in the first place anyway.

      The iPod video formats are almost as limited as the PSP's.

    2. Re:MPEG4 supported - OK, but which MPEG4? by CronoCloud · · Score: 1
      The iPod video formats are almost as limited as the PSP's.


      Take a look at those IPod Video formats again....they ARE the PSP's, or very similar. Similar enough that you can play PSP encoded video in iTunes 6. I just checked. I'm tempted to buy Quicktime 7 Pro just to see if the video it creates can be played on my PSP.

  82. Will Ferrel's Super-Magnifying Glasses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A 2.5" screen?

    Anyone recall the SNL bit with Will Ferrel and Jimmy Fallon where Ferrel whips out some magnifying glasses in order to read a super-small email device? I'm going to have to get me a pair of those.

  83. Disney's new strategy by cfish · · Score: 1

    Disney's head first jump into content delivery is absolutely no surprise in the business community. Robert Iger, The new Disney's CEO, has been under pressure to pick up the mess that Eisner left off. Iger's been talking about delivering digital content since day one on the job. And ABC is owned by Disney.

    1. Re:Disney's new strategy by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's also a way for the new management to kiss up to Steve Jobs, who happens to be the CEO of the successful animation company that walked away from Disney recently because of the old management...

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
  84. FrontRow Question by pmike_bauer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Does anyone know if FrontRow (and remote) will be available for anything other than the new iMac?

    I can't find any info about this on Apple's site.

    --
    I read /. for the (Score:-1, Conservative) comments.
    1. Re:FrontRow Question by sld126 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but you have to wait two weeks. http://www.thinksecret.com/

      --
      You're just jealous because the voices only talk to me.
    2. Re:FrontRow Question by pmike_bauer · · Score: 1

      I checked thinksecret; there isn't any info (I can find) about FrontRow other than it is included with new iMacs. Could you provide a link to the information.

      --
      I read /. for the (Score:-1, Conservative) comments.
    3. Re:FrontRow Question by WombatControl · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, the new remote will be available for separate purchase - it's $29. I'd imagine that includes FrontRow. However, the wait times are 2-3 weeks at the moment, which probably explains why they're not publicizing that.

    4. Re:FrontRow Question by pmike_bauer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Some guy on www.tuaw.com claims to have spoken with an apple sales rep about this. Supposedly, Front Row won't be available for older macs. I sure hope he's wrong.

      --
      I read /. for the (Score:-1, Conservative) comments.
    5. Re:FrontRow Question by NatasRevol · · Score: 1
      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    6. Re:FrontRow Question by heeeraldo · · Score: 1

      none of the other iMacs have the IR port in the front, so I'm not surprised.

    7. Re:FrontRow Question by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      I wonder why they didn't go with Bluetooth rather than IR.

  85. Torrent for iTunes6 by Ranger+Rick · · Score: 1

    FYI, I've put up a torrent for iTunes6 here

    --

    WWJD? JWRTFM!!!

    1. Re:Torrent for iTunes6 by gerardrj · · Score: 1

      Why? Apple's servers are supplying it at over 400KB/s!

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    2. Re:Torrent for iTunes6 by Ranger+Rick · · Score: 1

      They weren't to me. I kept getting timeouts after getting about 5 meg of it.

      --

      WWJD? JWRTFM!!!

  86. Two words by melted · · Score: 1

    Pr0n podcasting.

  87. Flaws in these products from Apple... by Wonderkid · · Score: 1
    1) iMac + Front Row. So, I'm forced to us a 17" or 20" iMac. Why note the Mini Mac, which can be connected to a larger 30" monitor and therefore more the size of a decent large screen TV? Seems very boring to me. And why is the remote infra red and not Bluetooth so it is not line of site?

    2) iPod 'video'. Why watch video on a 2.5" screen? No input capability for editing contacts. No gaming ability. A PSP has a larger screen, plays games, surfs the web and has built in WiFi. I just don't see the point! I will buy a Sony Ericsson P990 wish 4Gig Memory Stick and be able to view several movies on the go on a larger screen - and have all the benefits of a smart phone.

    None of this is very innovative and offerings from Archaos are more flexible, even if not as sleep and well integrated. I HAVE NO INTEREST IN WATCHING LOST ON A 2.5" SCREEN! I WANT TO WATCH IT ON A LARGE SCREEN, AND NOT BY FIDDLING AROUND CONNECTING AN iPOD TO MY TV! I WANT THE FILES ON MY HOME MEDIA SERVER!

    --

    O'WONDERWe're working on it.

    1. Re:Flaws in these products from Apple... by YukonTech · · Score: 0

      Than download the episode of lost in iTunes, and watch it on your big TV via a tv out adapter(about $20US) from your mac mini, iBook, powerbook, eMac, PowerMac, or any windows PC (if you have a videocard that supports tv out).

  88. Burnable Movies? by fupeg · · Score: 1

    If you buy a song from ITMS, you can burn it to a CD. I think there is some limitation on how often you do this (though I think the limitation applies to playlists.) It doesn't look like you can do the same thing with the videos from ITMS, i.e. burn them as a video CD and/or a DVD. Personally I would want to be able to play a TV show I bought, on my home theater or in my bedroom. Having to buy a new iPod, download the video to the iPod from my computer, take the iPod to my living room and connect it, get up to press pause on the iPod when I want to get a drink from the kitchen, etc. does not seem like a good way to go. Burning it to a DVD and popping that in to my DVD player seems a lot better.

    1. Re:Burnable Movies? by gerardrj · · Score: 1

      Lets make a simple assumption that FrontRow will be able to stream audio over the existing AirTunes system w/ an Airport Express base station. All you need is
      1. Get the video out port of your iMac connected to your computer. This takes a $30 adapter to go from miniVGA to s-Videoa and $20 worth of cabling
      2. An infrared remote control extender. You just need the built-in camera to see the remote's IR signals. Such devices are already available.

      Bingo! You iMac sits in the office and you can watch all your videos on your home theater system.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    2. Re:Burnable Movies? by fupeg · · Score: 1

      Front Row is only part of the new iMacs, at least so far. So now I have to plop down $1300+ for this solution to work.

      Besides, Front Row is overkill. I just want to watch a TV show I bought on my TV. Just being able to burn it to a DVD is so much simpler.

  89. Upsetting... by illumina+us · · Score: 1

    This upsets me quite a bit since I just purchased a new color iPod less than a month ago. As soon as a saw the screen I thought "my, this would be great for video." Now I gotta wait for the a linux kernel that supports my iPod before I can watch video on it. Thanks Apple...

    --
    -illumina+us "I put on my robe and wizard hat..."
  90. What IS that remote? IR? RF? BT? by catmistake · · Score: 1

    I understand it works for the iMac... and if you have the universal iPod dock...

    its only $26 for students and the education crowd...

    But what IS it? is it IR? RF? BT?

    Front Row Media Experience sounds very cool... Is it and the remote going to work with my PowerBook, even though I don't have an iPod? If not... why would they exclude the rest of the media crowd that doesn't have an iPod?

    1. Re:What IS that remote? IR? RF? BT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The remote is IR (the receiver in the iMac is located behind the Apple logo). So no, it won't work with your PowerBook since it doesn't have an IR receiver.

  91. Since it is ABC doing this by Solr_Flare · · Score: 1

    Keep in mind ABC also owns ESPN, so you can bet if this thing takes off, up next will be sports broadcasts and other ESPN shows. Imagine the potential. Missed that game you wanted to see? No problem, for $2 you can download it and watch it whenever and whereever you want.

    --
    You are who you are, let no one tell you different. But, never close your mind to a new point of view.
  92. How about.. by chrisnewbie · · Score: 0

    How about making a toilet paper holder into an IPOD ?this way i can listen to music on the crapper,

    here are some other ideas that may help propagate the IPOD frenzy, Microsoft has given itself the task of being in your living room, why apple will be everywhere else

    -toaster ipod
    -leaf raker ipod
    -tire pump ipod
    -Dildo ipod (why not)

  93. Firewire is DEAD by Tester · · Score: 1, Troll

    Apple has finally abandonned Firewire...
    For the first time, no shipping iPod supports Firewire. Lets remember that the original iPod (which I still own) only supported firewire and did not have the special dock connector but a regular firewire socket on it. Seems like Apple has thrown in the towel. Its interesting to note that the new iMac G5 does not have firewire 800 either. And even the powermac has a single firewire 800 port (and 2 x 400)...

    1. Re:Firewire is DEAD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iMac's have FW400 to differentiate them from the pro line, that's normal. But I am sad to see FW no longer on the iPod.

    2. Re:Firewire is DEAD by LJWhorfin · · Score: 1

      no firewire on the new iPod is really a deal killer for me... i have a couple of firewire drives, a firewire cam, and plug my firewire iPod into the end of that chain. To hook my laptop up to all this i just plug in ONE plug.. now i'd i have to start plugging in usb devices too.. or get a dang hub with yet another power adapter brick... Unless USB 2.0 can daisy chain or something.. this really sucks.. it does VIDEO -- the stanard for all DV Camcorders is firewire no firewire = i'll stick with the iPod i have.

    3. Re:Firewire is DEAD by Burz · · Score: 1

      no firewire on the new iPod is really a deal killer for me... i have a couple of firewire drives, a firewire cam, and plug my firewire iPod into the end of that chain. To hook my laptop up to all this i just plug in ONE plug.. now i'd i have to start plugging in usb devices too.. or get a dang hub with yet another power adapter brick... Unless USB 2.0 can daisy chain or something.. this really sucks.. it does VIDEO -- the stanard for all DV Camcorders is firewire no firewire = i'll stick with the iPod i have.

      Yes, interesting isn't it?

      This leaves no possibility that a 3rd party could write a firmware update which would allow people to neatly and simply plug their camcorders into a new "vPod."

  94. ...unless you have a Subaru by dettifoss · · Score: 1

    Even the new Monster universal connector thingumajig listed on the Apple car connector page won't connect your iPod to a Subaru. I've looked at so many after market connectors - none list Subaru. My iTrip rf transmitter is great (and so is my Subaru) but I sure would love a direct connection. Ah well... That's the beauty of all wheel drive.

  95. Can it play .VOB files?? by DaveM753 · · Score: 1

    I hope, I hope, I hope...

  96. Why the shouting/whining? by joelsanda · · Score: 1

    I HAVE NO INTEREST IN WATCHING LOST ON A 2.5" SCREEN! I WANT TO WATCH IT ON A LARGE SCREEN, AND NOT BY FIDDLING AROUND CONNECTING AN iPOD TO MY TV! I WANT THE FILES ON MY HOME MEDIA SERVER!

    Wow ... I have a suggestion. Why not shout about your disastisfaction with a product you are not required to use in a forum where, I'm quite certain, thousands of others wish to hear you whining.

    My seven year old child doesn't whine like that. And it's a damn good thing to, otherwise I'd have failed him.

    --
    The Luddites were ahead of their time.
  97. Classic iPod quotes by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 4, Funny
    "Agree with the article poster - Lame. Not only is this a lackluster MP3 unit (which by virtue of being firewire will be limited to Apple Mac owners), but it has virtually no UI wizardry that might define it as an Apple product. A total waste of time."

    "Raise your hand if you have iTunes ...
    Raise your hand if you have a FireWire port ...
    Raise your hand if you have both ...
    Raise your hand if you have $400 to spend on a cute Apple device ...
    There is Apple's market. Pretty slim, eh? I don't see many sales in the future of iPod."
    And of course, the obligatory "Apple's going under:"
    Goofy internal projects, expensive gaffes trying to "diversify" into areas it has only a tenuous relationship to, a complete inability to understand markets, and a constitutional immunity against learning from their mistakes. There is no future in a $400 (about $250 too expensive) firewire-only (5% of computer users) hardrive-based (read: fragile) mp3 player. Any one of these critical flaws might doom the product - take them all together and you have another classic corporate farce. When you see silliness on this level, though, normally you expect to see a raging egotist who is immune to common sense and criticism in some position of power in the company... oh wait, Steve Jobs. Never mind. This just reinforces my steadily growing sense of foreboding about Apple. Yes, I've said this before and been wrong, but I'll say it again anyway. They're living on borrowed time."
    Names hidden to spare any embarrassment.

    See the original thread from the time of the original iPod launch.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
    1. Re:Classic iPod quotes by The+Bungi · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're absolutely spot on but... you've been saving that for five years just to get a +5 funny mod? Does this not bother you, even a little bit?

    2. Re:Classic iPod quotes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, and its still funny; besides, its not like he gets a karma boost or anything.

    3. Re:Classic iPod quotes by GlenRaphael · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      To respond to the "question for gun advocates" in your signature, I think it would be a fine idea if we left it up to the airlines to decide their own policy, and I personally would feel much safer and less aggravated if airlines didn't search for guns or knives. Also, for what it's worth, I carry a pocketknife on my keychain and often have it with me when I get on an airplane. The current don't-carry-a-blade restrictions are (a) an annoying waste of time, and (b) totally ineffective at their stated purpose.

      They are somewhat more effective at their unstated purpose, which seems to be to make citizens feel like authorities "are doing something" about a perceived problem.

      --
      I play Nerd-Folk!
    4. Re:Classic iPod quotes by leftyfb · · Score: 1

      firewire only? I'm not sure where your getting this but I see nothing that says it's firewire only and in fact it advertises all over the place the USB accessories to go with it.

    5. Re:Classic iPod quotes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And don't forget all the "there's no way Apple will release a video ipod! Jobs has said there's no market for it" kinda posts from the recent threads speculating about what Apple is going to release...

    6. Re:Classic iPod quotes by NFNNMIDATA · · Score: 1

      These comments would all be dead-on today if not for one small detail: Apple decided to redesign and market the device to Windows users. There's nothing embarrassing about these comments, they are accurate in a world where Apple only sells iPods to Apple users (i.e. the world at the time)...

    7. Re:Classic iPod quotes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot proves it conclusively - Only stupid people buy iPods.

    8. Re:Classic iPod quotes by srblackbird · · Score: 1

      "This is by far the coolest MP3 player out there. And yes, it is upgradable, so people can get Ogg working on it."

      --
      "The test of the morality of a society is what it does for it's children." -Dietrich Bonhoeffer
    9. Re:Classic iPod quotes by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      Dude, if I saw you on a plane with a pocket knife, I'd rugby tackle you immediately, have the cabin crew restrain you, and stick around to ensure that the feds are there to meet you when we make an emergency landing. Loon.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    10. Re:Classic iPod quotes by iroll · · Score: 1

      That's because you missed the fact that the entire post was CLASSIC iPod quotes; i.e. about the original iPod release. It was, in fact, only available to Mac users with Firewire. USB etc came later as the Windows kits came around.

      --
      Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
    11. Re:Classic iPod quotes by Axe · · Score: 1
      I'd rugby tackle you immediately

      You are a dangerous lunatic then. Quite the typical gun control advocate - somebody who would trust himself with a weapon.

      --
      <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
  98. What I want to know is... by marsperson · · Score: 1

    does it scratch easily?

  99. Doesn't really explain things by reptilicus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ---Well, they are in the middle of a massive shift to intel x86 based processors. That might have something to do with it.---

    If that's the case, then why upgrade the iMac now, the Mini a few weeks ago, the Xserve last month, and the iBook in July? None of these feature x86 processors yet, and they seem to have managed to increase performance for them.

    And whatever happened to those dual core and low power G5 chips that IBM claimed to have?

    1. Re:Doesn't really explain things by crawling_chaos · · Score: 1
      And whatever happened to those dual core and low power G5 chips that IBM claimed to have?

      I think you just hit on the reason that Apple will be using Intel Inside going forward. IBM didn't deliver on its promises and made Steve look foolish. The man is really, really good at holding a grudge.

      Interestingly enough, it appears that maybe the porting thing is as easy as Apple has made it out to be. Over on the World of Warcraft support boards, Blizzard has noted that they've been building WoW for OSX Intel nightly along with the Windows and PPC versions since June and it is already in private beta with nVidia, ATI, and Apple employees. Now Blizz does write fairly portable code, as they always release Mac and Windows on the same day, so they may already have had a leg up, but this does seem promising.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
  100. I heard Apple ][ Mini.. by itomato · · Score: 1

    I thought I heard something about an Apple ][ Mini. Pocket-size, VisiCalc, updated with AirPort and Bluetooth. Low power, ObjBASIC, 80x25 RSS feeds of PodCasts..

    1. Re:I heard Apple ][ Mini.. by tim1724 · · Score: 1

      the Apple II only had 80x24, not 80x25. (well, the early Apple II models only had 40x24 .. 80x24 was added later)

      --
      -- Tim Buchheim
  101. AirTunes Express for video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Universal dock + apple remote + ipod. The dock and remote plus the required a/v cable set costs less than a hundred bucks. That way dropping your ipod into the doc lets you sit across the room and control what sounds/pictures go out the wire into your home stereo setup and so on, similar to the way the airport express thing works now (at least the parts of that device that relate to the user pushing content to their home entertainment system).

    1. Re:AirTunes Express for video by calibanDNS · · Score: 1

      My problem with that solution is that viewing the video content becomes dependent on the iPod. When I go on a business trip and take my iPod, my wife would still want to view the video content (stored on a PC) at our house. An iPod is also small enoug to easily lose or be stolen from your bag/pocket/car etc. The AirShow Express (my name for it) has a permanent place in your home theater setup and also serves to extend the range of your wireless network (not a required function, but something that the AirTunes Express does today).

    2. Re:AirTunes Express for video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      So buy two iPods.

      Sincerely,
      Steve Jobs ;)

  102. Movie Quote... by Danathar · · Score: 1

    "Frankly my dear I don't give a damn!"

  103. 2 Questions... by Franklinstein · · Score: 1
    Will this support my existing divx/xvid library?

    Is this going to cause companies to crack down even harder on tv show distribution via bittorrent?

  104. Re:Finally... there *are* TV shows available by Mercano · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hey, perhaps this will allow that whole internet disributed fan financed "TV" show idea that gets dug up again every time someone's favorite cult show gets axed.

    --
    #include <signature.h>
  105. Yay for brand recognition. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Informative

    DivX is a CODEC which implements the MPEG-4 bytestream format. Like XviD and the QuickTime MPEG-4 encoder, it produces MPEG-4 bytestreams of the form playable by the iPod (assuming it satisfies the bitrate / resolution constraints, and has an audio stream that the iPod can play, e.g. MPEG-4 AAC) and any other MPEG-4 player.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    1. Re:Yay for brand recognition. by Kjella · · Score: 5, Informative

      DivX is a CODEC which implements the MPEG-4 bytestream format. Like XviD and the QuickTime MPEG-4 encoder, it produces MPEG-4 bytestreams of the form playable by the iPod (assuming it satisfies the bitrate / resolution constraints, and has an audio stream that the iPod can play, e.g. MPEG-4 AAC) and any other MPEG-4 player.

      Well, there's MPEG4, MPEG4 and MPEG4. DivX/Xvid are MPEG4 ASP, but not the same as MPEG4 AVC aka MPEG4 level 10 aka H.264. And AAC is a sound codec (though used mostly with MPEG4 AVC). Long live confusion.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re:Yay for brand recognition. by agraupe · · Score: 1

      But will the iPod support the codec itself? Since I'm mostly into ripping stuff from DVD (because I'm not cheap like some people around here; I only BT non-DVD-released movies and shows I can't get) I can always just switch codecs, but XviD support would be preferred.

    3. Re:Yay for brand recognition. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But will the iPod support the codec itself?

      The problem isn't the codec, its the container. Most downloaded XviD/DivX movies are in AVI containers, which are not part of the MPEG-4 standard. The iPod supports the standard. In other words, blame the people using .AVI instead of .MP4 containers.

      In any event, the iPod only supports MPEG-4 up to a certain resolution and bitrate (see Apple's site), which your existing files might be over.

  106. am I the only one... by jwachter · · Score: 1

    ...who is having touble finding the "video" section of the music store? I've upgraded to iTunes 6, but can't seem to find any links to the ABC content on the front page of the music store.

    1. Re:am I the only one... by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      I haven't downloaded 6 yet, but there are ads for Lost and Desperate Housewives on the front page of the store. Unfortunately, it seems like you can't really get to the main TV index (if it exists) from these...

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
  107. I might finally buy an iPod by Yonder+Way · · Score: 1

    I would love to see Apple make iTunes work in a more friendly way with third party applications. For example, use iTunes to pull video from your MythTV down to your iPod.

    The price point of the iPod has kept me away for a long time, but if I can start watching videos on it, I might finally break down and blow the dust out of my wallet.

  108. ipod car Bluetooth solution by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

    The Bluetooth idea is very good. There are Bluetooth profiles for audio distribution and for audio remote control that could be employed. You'd just need to find a Bluetooth module that implements them. Rolling your own profile in software, starting from lower level on the stack is real PITA and serious time-to-market killer.

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
  109. Re:Finally...-math by kgruscho · · Score: 2, Informative

    2x2=4

    320x240=76800
    640x480=307200 (VGA)

    320x240 is QVGA for quarter VGA
    it has 1/4 the pixels and data.

  110. are you dense by tehwebguy · · Score: 1

    ok first of all, the ipod your car link looks the same now that it did for the past 6 months (except there is a new ipod shopped into the picture at the top)

    there is a load of news that happened regarding apple, and the car shit has nothing to do with any of it.

    you sir, are an idiot

    --
    -- lol pwned
  111. Cheap TV Shows by drewxhawaii · · Score: 1

    How, exactly, is a 2 minute song worth $0.99 while a 30 minute TV show can be had for $1.99 ? Don't get me wrong, I'm not complaining, I think it's the first under-priced "product" that Apple offers. Perhaps the commercials are included, I guess we'll see. Who am I kidding, I don't even own an iPod.

    1. Re:Cheap TV Shows by libra-dragon · · Score: 1

      I think it's fair pricing. TV shows are commonly watched only once. I'd pay the $1.99 to not have the commercials.

      They could sell the entire season for $19.99 like they do with DVDs... Paying in advance would be even cooler, subscription models may be good for TV shows.

  112. I'd pay 50 bucks for high quality video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    of my favorite TV shows. That would make the tv networks a lot of money -- I don't see why they don't all start doing this. For example, I love 24, but don't have time to watch it whwen it airs, and I don't have a DVR where I live now -- just a laptop with an internet connection. Let me pay a few dollars to download each week's episode at fairly high quality, and I'd do it for sure.

  113. What now? by Seanasy · · Score: 1

    So what do we bitch about Apple not selling now? Can we bitch about DRM'd TV episodes as $1.99 a pop until we think of something? When does Napster come out with subscription service to TV shows?

    1. Re:What now? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      In the UK, we can complain about Apple ripping people off even more than previously. Today, the exchange rate with the US dollar is $1 = £0.57. Apple-maths works this out as 99 = 79p (22.5p - 40% - over the exchange rate price). Now their exchange rate for video is $1.99 = $1.99 (75.5p - 67% - over the exchange rate price). Videos cost almost twice as much in the UK as in America - a particularly stupid decision since the BBC streams a significant amount of material for free to UK citizens, so they are competing with free, convenient, and legal (but with no long-term save feature) over here, as well as free, convenient and illegal. It's triply stupid, since the UK gets American TV shows a significant amount of time after the US, and it looks like iTMS is keeping the same schedule, making piracy even more attractive in comparison.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  114. Re:Finally... there *are* TV shows available by porcupine8 · · Score: 4, Informative
    From Apple.com:

    From there, the sky's the limit, because you own purchased video forever. Watch as many times as you choose, share between five computers, burn to data CDs or sync to the new iPod.

    Sounds like it's exactly like the DRM for music, except you can't burn actual DVDs. Until someone posts the workaround next week.

    --
    Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
  115. eMac discontinued? by WMD_88 · · Score: 1

    It appears from the store that the eMac has been taken out of regular circulation. Now it's only in the education section.

  116. Incredible boon to travelers... by lpangelrob · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Well, that's a pleasant surprise. Here I was thinking "Why would we really want to download music videos?" and Apple comes out and gets ABC in on the deal. For $10, suddenly people can have 2 1/2 hours or more of video on their hard drives to keep them occupied while waiting in line at the airport.

    I wonder if those videos will have commercials? Not that you couldn't skip those either now...

    1. Re:Incredible boon to travelers... by Capt_Troy · · Score: 1

      No commercials, 1.99 per show.

  117. Voice Interface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Odd they don't have the voice interface people have been asking for yet, press and hold a button and talk and it chooses the song/movie or playlist. Or, rather than press & hold, work off a trigger word you specify (ipod play XYZ, ipod replay) or something .. though obviously a default of "ipod" is too common a word to be the trigger. And obviously it'll be possible to disable this feature when not needed.

    Other wanted feature is ability to run your own applets.

  118. Okay. by Auraiken · · Score: 1

    What's stopping you from converting the videos yourself?

  119. DRM and Price Point by pavon · · Score: 1

    Yeah that price point is perfect for TV shows. On par with TV series DVDs where you can get a season for $30, a while after the initial release. Much better than many of the Anime studios that try and charge you over $5 an episode years after it has been released.

    On the negative side, the DRM is the same as the thier music files, and is unacceptable to me. This is just because when I purchase something to put into my library I want it to last. I don't know where Apple and their proprietary DRM is going to be in 20 years. I don't know if I will be able to find devices to play it with. I don't know if I will be able to legaly transfer it to another format, and even if I did it would certainly loose quality do to the nature of lossy encoding.

    So I think I will stay with DVD's for anything I want to purchase. While encumbered, the DRM is at least a wide spread industry standard if not an open one, and is licenced under a RAND policy not a proprietary one. I am sure I'll be able to find DVD players for years to come.

    That said, the price point is low enough to where it is almost reasonable to buy media instead of renting it. And looking at it from the point of a rental, I don't have as big of a problem with DRM - the only problem is the proprietary nature creates vendor lock-in, I can't choose from dozens of players. It will be interesting to see what direction(s) the media markets move in. I have always assumed that a subscription system would rule IPTV, which would require even more lock-in and DRM to insure that you are only renting, not keeping the movies. But if the companies are truely enlightened enough to keep purchase prices down low enough, it could make the concept of rental obsolete. That is a really appealing idea - set the prices low enough that purchases would be far more impulsive and frequent.

  120. Ummm... by Fusen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe it's because this article is quite new but why hasn't anyone actually said anything about the fact this is just a normal ipod with a 2.5"(!!) screen that can play video? If you want to watch videos on the move then why not go for a real PMP like anything from www.archos.com as they at least have a 3+" screen so you can actually see what you are trying to watch... I mean seriously a 2.5" screen and one video codec supported(?). This isn't exactly a great PMP, but ho hum, this is apple so I'm not surprised no one has critisized it

    1. Re:Ummm... by sickofthisshit · · Score: 1

      Ah, yes.

      But I think you mean to say something like

      "No support for DivX. Smaller screen than an Archos. Lame."

  121. Re:Finally... there *are* TV shows available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why waste a DVD on 320x240 video? CDs will do fine. Apple saves on space and it saves time for consumers if the video is smaller.

  122. Do you have all the packaging? by SamTheButcher · · Score: 3, Informative
    If you take all of it in to your (hopefully) local Apple Store and ask nicely, you might be surprised.

    Then again, if you take it in and ask nicely and they say "no", ask louder and gripe more. If they still say no, whine and cry and gripe and ask for the manager.

    Then you'll be surprised. :)

    1. Re:Do you have all the packaging? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I imaged the manager coming out, aLo! and Behold! it's Steve Jobs...followed by two goons with baseball bats....

      sorry, but that would be funny as hell.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  123. 10 months is a lifetime in this industry by reptilicus · · Score: 1

    I've been waiting a lot longer than 10 months for a PowerBook that was a significant improvement over the 1st Gen TiBook I currently use. The mere speedbumps along the way haven't been that impressive (oooh, backlit keyboard, that's worth $2500 to me!).

    Whatever happened to the low power G5 chips IBM keeps swearing that they have?

    1. Re:10 months is a lifetime in this industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Whatever happened to the low power G5 chips IBM keeps swearing that they have?

      I think you just answered your own question. They don't have them, which is why Apple is waiting to switch the powerbooks over to Intel.

    2. Re:10 months is a lifetime in this industry by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      They are packing them in Blades for thier bladecenter. We're probably going to look at them in the near future for webservers. JS520. Take a look. 2 970's into a single blade. Cool stuff.

      --

      Gorkman

  124. Content Distribution by bombadillo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The real story is content distribution. Apple just broke into the video distribution market in a huge way. Add this video itunes service with the new iMac remote control and you can guess were apple is headed. They are headed straight to your living room. MicroSoft has the same strategy to dominate the living room. MS has chosen another route with their Media Center version of Windows. I would say Apple just took a huge lead. It will be interesting how this play out...

  125. What is missing? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    Can does front row have Tivo like capabilities?
    Seems like a good way to get content on that video ipod. I could record what I want and then dump it to my ipod for the ride to work.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  126. How fast will you be able to store pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want an ipod with built in card readers so that i can download pictures from my digicam to it. The old ipods are way to slow for practical use. If they can make it do this, then they would gain more users like me waiting for this great feature to come about.

  127. Needed but not available by AxsDeny · · Score: 1

    This may change soon, but as of right now, the installer states that you need Quicktime 7.0.3 to view videos. I tried software update and had no luck. I went to the Apple download and update site to see if it was available. It wasn't.

    If they are going to release something this huge, shouldn't they have made 7.0.3 immediately available?

    --

    zork% mv *.asp /bin/darkroom
    283 files eaten by a grue
  128. front row, mac mini and me by markowen58 · · Score: 1

    Home Theatre perfection.

  129. yes, but is front-row... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... going to be purchasable as a software package? I've spent 2 years tinkering with a linux based PVR and finally have something working (I've been hacking together hardware, so don't take this as a thrust towards linux based pvr's). I'd like more, but the first one was a bit much and really more of the adventure then the destination type of thing, so why repeat it... well, a mac mini and this (in my car!!!) would be sweet! But will Apple release Front-Row as a standalone product!?!?

    I guess Front-Row was the one of the only REAL surprises of the announcement.

    1. Re:yes, but is front-row... by iowannaski · · Score: 1

      Front Row isn't PVR software, it's just a presentation layer for accessing existing programs on your mac using a remote.

      --
      i forget
  130. Eh by reptilicus · · Score: 1

    A remote control and a built in camera don't strike me as that big of a deal.

    And neither will do much for me on the road in the iMac form factor.

  131. What an idea by ChrisF79 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just what everyone needs on our highways... video while driving. This is almost as good as drive through liquor stores!

    --
    Finance tutorials and more! Understandfinance
    1. Re:What an idea by n8_f · · Score: 1

      This is almost as good as drive through liquor stores!

      Way to kick New Orleans while they're down.

  132. Portable PVR by kingjosh · · Score: 1

    It looks like Apple's new product is lame compared with today's announcement of a Mini Media Player that interfaces with your PVR to download television! I wonder why that didn't get covered? No Slashdot mods own Dish Network stock?

  133. Just For You - Beta by Y-Crate · · Score: 1

    iTunes 6 also includes 'Just For You (Beta)' which finally brings a recommendations system to iTunes.

    On another note, I have to join the chorus on those that are saying ScuttleMonkey totally missed the boat on the description. The new iMacs/w integrated video camera and remote, FrontRow, downloadable TV shows, etc.

  134. Apple Slashdot-ed by Been+on+TV · · Score: 1

    This is the first time I can remember to have gotten "unable to connect" and "network error" messages from Apple's server. And this just because of an article on Slashdot on iPod in cars!

    --
    The future is in beta
  135. Frontrow is not competition for Media Center by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    First and foremost I cannot find mention of PVR capability.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:Frontrow is not competition for Media Center by argent · · Score: 1

      Frontrow is not competition for Media Center

      Right. It's missing the all-important virus, malware, and invisible system corruption features that Windows brings to the table.

    2. Re:Frontrow is not competition for Media Center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and the Apple Nazi's too.

    3. Re:Frontrow is not competition for Media Center by argent · · Score: 1

      and the Apple Nazi's too.

      Apostrophe abusers will be the first up against the wall when the revolution comes.

  136. DVD RIP-ability (attn lawyers, EFF) by a_greer2005 · · Score: 1

    The time has come for a major tech company to clamp the balls of the movie industry -- and SJ just did the job -- It SHOULD NOT in any way be illegat to transfer DVDs to this new device in the same way one can transfer CDs to an iPod of yesterday...but it is, while we are at it, it shouldnt be illegal to make a backup hardcopies of DVDs...If the law suets fly now, along with this, we may be able to get a few rights back.

  137. No American auto makers listed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't it ironic? Where are the Ford, Chrysler, Chevrolet, Jeep, and CADILLAC?

  138. iPod diagnostic menu by JonTurner · · Score: 1

    >>the iPod keeps a record of maximum and minimum temperatures
    >Any source for this tidbit?

    The iPod Diagnostic menu.

    Restart ("Select"+"Menu")
    Press & hold the center button ("select") and the left button (">" buttons to navigate. Center button to select, play/pause button to exit.

    Select "DRV TEMP" from the menu on the second page. Shows max, min and current temperatures.

  139. Hipipodamous by seedoubleyou · · Score: 1

    Don't forget about the ESPN side of Disney/ABC. Sports highlights and games and such could be huge. Now when do we get our itunes iMUSICVIDEOPHONE?!? Steve? Motorola? Anyone? Can you call it the WOPR?

  140. Only one drawback by MacGod · · Score: 1

    I really like the new iPods et al. but there's one thing I think is a major drawback-the lack of remote port. I like the remote itself, but more than that, a number of accessories (I own an iTrip and a Burton Amp Pack myself for my 3G iPod) which rely on the remote port. The iTrip I don't mind re-buying if need be, as it's only $35, but the Amp Pack costs almost as much as the iPod itself! Now, Burton may offer a way to buy the electronics portion (perhaps connecting to the dock port), but if not, my Amp Pack becomes much less useful if I ever want to upgrade my iPod.

    --
    "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one " -Albert Einstein
  141. Re:The Remote = Shuffle + Menu button = underwhelm by ciroknight · · Score: 1

    The Remote is a disappointment. It's basically a Shuffle with a menu button. Doesn't have the touch-sensitive wheel that makes navigating through long lists of songs such a pleasure. Of course, I haven't tried it with Front Row yet, but I'm not really looking forward to it due to the clunkiness of the design.

    I hope you were drunk when you posted this, though being it's 4pm here, that'd be not such a good thing. What is a remote's #1 function? To control things, remotely. This remote successfully clears that barrier, and it looks good to boot. By not being a television set, it didn't need to include a scroll wheel to scroll through channels, or number buttons to get direct access to a channel. Instead, it's elegant, simple, and doesn't require a brain surgeon to program and use the thing. For once, a company stops trying to create a universal remote.

    The only disappointing thing for me is its size. If it were smaller, I could put it on my keychain and turn off and on my computer and movies as I'm coming in from work. But, then again, this would go against a lot of things Apple stands for, and I can understand why they didn't go this route (especially people driving cars that already have keychain dongles, garage door dongles, flashlights, and whatever other keyhooks they might have).

    A remote control doesn't need a touch sensitive wheel; that's un-nessicary cost, especially for a default menu that has 4 options, for DVDs that usually have 4 option menus, etc.

    --
    "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
  142. iPod next step by phorm · · Score: 1

    If the video thing catches on, I wonder if the next step for iPod might be to go to something PDA-like. Having IR in iPods would be useful for syncing and iPod-TV (wasn't there something on here about really fast IR awhile ago?)... the ability to add programs would be another cool step, although a keyboard would mess-up the design so perhaps they'd have to be simpler, shuffle-button programs.

  143. Missing the point by dreamer-of-rules · · Score: 1

    Folks wanted a video iPod for a long time. Maybe you didn't. But it has been requested and desired as soon as the iPhoto came out. Parents really want to show videos of their kids. Would I watch Jumanji or Twister on it? No. You also missed that they shrunk it down again. The 20GB is less than 1/2" thick. This is an improvement to the existing iPod line. It still has room to grow. It is still better than the competitors.

    However..

    You are seriously missing the big picture.

    Apple has built a web, a network, of interconnected products, content, and services that has Apple at its heart. Cars with *iPod-only* connectors. iTunes, already the biggest distributor of legally downloaded music, now selling *current* TV shows. iTunes runs on Mac *and Windows*. iPods already have 75% of the mp3 player market, and they *only work with iTunes*. What's next? Well, Apple has built the remote already...

    --
    Everyone is entitled to his own opinions, but not his own facts.
  144. Apple's site is updated by MatrixGL · · Score: 1

    Check it out:

    http://www.apple.com/ipod/ipod.html

    has the u2 videos and a QTVR

  145. Disney, of all companies by mblase · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What amazes me is that Disney (owner of ABC), which was the last major media company to start selling DVDs, was the first company to provide downloadable video to Apple this way.

    Granted their partnership with Jobs' Pixar Animation Studios was probably a big reason they agreed, but nevertheless -- this is a big switch (IMO) from the Disney I used to know. Hopefully it won't be long before other studios and networks see the download numbers for "Lost" and jump in. I bet if HBO can be persuaded to offer their shows on the iTMS (iTunes Media Store, now, I suppose), sales at the Store would skyrocket.

    1. Re:Disney, of all companies by MetaPhyzx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Keep in mind they may also see the way the RIAA companies are acting now about the 99 cent price point ITMS has. This time, the content providers have hindsight. I suspect there will be a serious effort to keep Apple from entrenching themselves in this media market as well as they did music. Personally, I hope those efforts fail :)

      --
      Blacker than my baby girl's stare. Black like the veil that the muslimina wear. Black like the planet that they fear...
    2. Re:Disney, of all companies by shotfeel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Granted their partnership with Jobs' Pixar Animation Studios was probably a big reason they agreed

      IMO Jobs (via Pixar) essentially putting his money where his mouth is will really help with this.

      OTOH I remember Eisner sitting in front of a congressional panel moaning about Apple and their Rip. Mix. Burn, campaign and how evil it was in light of how Dinsney's latest blockbuster, Monsters, Inc. was being downloaded over the net. I don't think it was until afterwords that someone pointed out to him the same Jobs behind Pixar's Monsters, Inc. was the same Jobs behind Rip. Mix. Burn. Not even a NYT article covering the hearing seemed to put the two together.

    3. Re:Disney, of all companies by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      "I bet if HBO can be persuaded to offer their shows on the iTMS (iTunes Media Store, now, I suppose), sales at the Store would skyrocket."

      HBO is too busy sending out cease & desist letters to the BitTorrenters downloading *Rome* and *The Cathouse* to be bothered with such a rational idea.

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    4. Re:Disney, of all companies by Total_Wimp · · Score: 1

      Granted their partnership with Jobs' Pixar Animation Studios was probably a big reason they agreed...

      Didn't Pixar decline to renew their contract with Disney?

      TW

    5. Re:Disney, of all companies by jcr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Fortunately for all concerned, Eisner's not running Disney anymore.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    6. Re:Disney, of all companies by KanSer · · Score: 1

      Lost is a fucking fantastic show, which is why I would not want to watch it on an iPod.

      However, the idea of an extensive anime library in... my... pocket...

      why it's... beautiful. My god, I do believe I'm crying.

      But seriously, if you own this content, it's going to be a TV revolution. And advertizers are going to feel so left out.

      --
      • MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward Wednesday April 20, @4:20
    7. Re:Disney, of all companies by qzulla · · Score: 1
      What amazes me is that Disney (owner of ABC), which was the last major media company to start selling DVDs, was the first company to provide downloadable video to Apple this way.

      They did? Where? None of the offerings from Pixar had anything to do with Disney. They are all independent Pixar works. And quite good, actually.

      qz

    8. Re:Disney, of all companies by exit174 · · Score: 1

      This is a slippery slope for the cable companies. Comcast, Cox, Adelphia, etc. don't want anything to do with ala carte pricing at the channel or show level. Look for them to engage in major litigation with apple over video show downloads.

    9. Re:Disney, of all companies by adpowers · · Score: 2, Informative

      Umm.... Lost and Desperate Housewives are both ABC products, along with the four other shows being offered online (in addition to the Pixar shorts and music videos).

      Andrew

    10. Re:Disney, of all companies by Loquis · · Score: 1

      I dont get what everyone see's in Lost, maybe someone can explain it to me. I watched a couple of episodes and found it hilariously bad.

    11. Re:Disney, of all companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not to mention PAINFULLY slow and dreary

    12. Re:Disney, of all companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mystery is incredibly engaging. Everyone's hanging on the edge of their seats wondering what the next piece will be.

      Personally, though, I've decided I don't care, for two reasons:

      1) I'm getting the impression that the writers of the show don't have a definite answer to all of the questions and are just making it up as they go along.

      2) Eventually, the mystery is going to have to be explained, and the answer in cases like this is never satisfying.

    13. Re:Disney, of all companies by Elranzer · · Score: 1
      I remember Eisner sitting in front of a congressional panel moaning about Apple and their Rip. Mix. Burn, campaign and how evil it was in light of how Dinsney's latest blockbuster, Monsters, Inc. was being downloaded over the net.
      Kinda ironic being Steve Jobs's company (Pixar) MADE that Disney blockbuster...
    14. Re:Disney, of all companies by mblase · · Score: 1

      Lost and Desperate Housewives are both ABC products

      And ABC is owned by Disney.

    15. Re:Disney, of all companies by mblase · · Score: 1

      Comcast, Cox, Adelphia, etc. don't want anything to do with ala carte pricing at the channel or show level.

      I wouldn't say that. After all, they make a lot of money with pay-per-view movie channels, which are essentially a la carte movie offerings (after you get the cable subscription, natch).

      But so what? The cable companies don't own the cable channels, nor do they own the content they produce. It's up to the owners of each show to decide whether to offer it on iTMS or not, not the cable companies.

    16. Re:Disney, of all companies by adpowers · · Score: 1

      Hehe, yeah, thanks, I forgot to make my point :).

  146. FrontRow vs Xbox 360? by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
    Anybody else see that demo page of the FrontRow remote/application in action and think it was a direct shot across the box of the Xbox 360? 'Cause I sure did.

    Go have a look.

    --
    If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    1. Re:FrontRow vs Xbox 360? by SeattleGameboy · · Score: 1

      No, you are the only one.

    2. Re:FrontRow vs Xbox 360? by Nielsvdw · · Score: 1

      looks more like a direct competitor to media center, but since its build into xbox360 :)

    3. Re:FrontRow vs Xbox 360? by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      No, you are the only one.

      Yeah, you are probably right.

      I see the Xbox 360 being positioned as a home media hub, with video and music capabilities, and probably downloadable content, wrapped in a slick interface and controlled by wireless remote.

      Then I see Apple releasing a new iMac, being positioned as a home media hub, with video and music capabilities, and definitely downloadable content, wrapped in a slick interface and controlled by wireless remote.

      But its probably all in my head. Thanks for the stunning insight, genius.

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    4. Re:FrontRow vs Xbox 360? by SeattleGameboy · · Score: 1

      If you have any clue about HTPC or home media devices in general, then you would know that Microsoft ALREADY HAS a device that IS positioned as a home media hub, with video and music capabilities and there are already downloadable content for this device.

      It is called Windows Media Center. And guess what? It has TV tuners. You know, that thing that most Americans spend their free time enjoying?

      XBox 360 is first and foremost a GAME CONSOLE!!! It is not "positioned" as a media hub. It is at best positioned as a complementary piece to the Windows Media Center. And if you are still clueless, ask any A/V enthusiast if a device with a 20GB hard drive (sold separately!) can be seriously be positioned as a "media hub".

      Your comment would have been somewhat plausible if you said "FrontRow vs MCE", but you still would have been laughed off as FrontRow does not have a TV tuner. How any device without a TV tuner is supposed to be positioned as a media hub is beyond me.

      It is a nice PC with a remote control from extra convenience. It has awhile to go before it can claim to be a media hub.

      Get a clue, genius.

    5. Re:FrontRow vs Xbox 360? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but I did notice that the iPod autosync page shows the device syncing with a laptop running Windows XP and not an Apple laptop.

    6. Re:FrontRow vs Xbox 360? by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      If you have any clue about HTPC or home media devices in general, then you would know that Microsoft ALREADY HAS a device that IS positioned as a home media hub, with video and music capabilities and there are already downloadable content for this device.

      HTPCs are practically an endangered species right now. Know why? Too expensive, too clumsy, and general all-around suckage. A MythTV box, Slingbox, or any number of other options blow the doors off an HTPC. So, take your own advice and:

      Get a clue, genius.

      And then go look at the Apple page again, 'cause you didn't the first time, and I suspect you have no idea what I'm talking about.

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    7. Re:FrontRow vs Xbox 360? by SeattleGameboy · · Score: 1

      Obviously you are too clueless to take my advice. Since you have no clue what a "hub" is, let me explain. hub (hb) noun A center of activity or interest; a focal point. Hmmm... the word "media hub" would indicate that it is the center of the all media activity. And guess what media activity DOMINATES a typical American citizen's life...oh wait, ITS A FREAKIN TV!!! How could you call a device a "media hub" when it does not include the very activity that is most popular??? HTPC is an endangered specie? Who says? You? The boy clueless? Next time you go to local computer store (say Fry's) check out all the Windows Media Center model they have. At the Fry's here, about 10% of PC models are Windows Media Center PC's. Endangered? I don't think so. You have obviously never looked at MCE if you think MythTV can run in the same circle. More valid comparison would be with Tivo boxes, which are, guess what... Linux boxes!!! There is better chance that Tivo and other PVR devices will become a media hub than Apple computer with a remote. I am sure this is too much for you to comprehend. And that is why you are the only one (out of millions on Slashdot) who thinks Jobs is trying to compete with Xbox 360.

    8. Re:FrontRow vs Xbox 360? by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that is if you visit the page with a PC. If you visit with a mac, the iMac is displayed. They detect your OS.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    9. Re:FrontRow vs Xbox 360? by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1
      Guess what? The Average Joe does not want a PC in the living room. They watch TV on a "TV".

      This front row app is aimed at teens, college students in dorms with limited space or people with small apartments.

      Tivo is an American phenomenon but even then, it is a niche product. You are a tech geek, the Average Joe probably does not know what a Tivo is.

      Stop reading slashdot for a while and interact with "real" regular people for a while to get rid of your myopic world view.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
  147. Car video! Cool! by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Funny

    'Cause you know, I get really bored when I'm driving alone, and it would be really great if I had something to WATCH to help pass the time!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  148. Apple gets a free pass with Front Row by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone even looked at the pictures for the Front Row application on Apples website?

    It's almost a pixel for pixel port of Media Center Edition for Windows. I guess it isn't always Windows copying off of Apple.

  149. DRM and post-apocalyptic fantasy scenarios by DECS · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How is an encumbered DVD, with its CSS DRM that you can bypass with DeCSS, different from Apple's AVC (H.264) with FairPlay DRM, which can be similarly bypassed?

    With a DVD, you'd have to rip it, then reencode it into DIVIX or something appropriate for a portable, which takes a LONG time. Apple's solution seems rather smart, and looks like a very natural extension of the iTMS.

    I like options:

    If you want high quality media, you continue buying CDs and DVDs, and rip them yourself at whatever bitrate makes you happy.

    If you want the convenience of an online store (the new "Just for you - Beta" looks pretty cool) and instant access to lots of pop content, you can pay a small fee and download smallish, ready to go files.

    Apple is offering both options to fit the desires of a broad swath of people.

    Compare this to Microsoft's WMP, which sought to kill MP3s entirely, and replace them with locked up WMA files with brutal restrictions, and very limited playback options.

    1. Re:DRM and post-apocalyptic fantasy scenarios by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Add to this in 20 years I doubt anyone will care much about their ancient shows at 320x240 resolution. Hopefully by then we will have realtime downloads of 4k resolution movies.

    2. Re:DRM and post-apocalyptic fantasy scenarios by pavon · · Score: 1

      How is an encumbered DVD, with its CSS DRM that you can bypass with DeCSS, different from Apple's AVC (H.264) with FairPlay DRM, which can be similarly bypassed?

      If you are resigned to having to break the law, then No, there is no difference. Heck, by that metric all DRM is acceptable because it is all breakable. But, in my opinion, accepting DRM just because you know you can get around it by breaking the law is foolish. Why support companies who may turn around and sue you? If the terms of the DRM are acceptable to me, then I will buy the product and use it according to the terms. If they are not then I will have nothing to do with the company whatsoever. Given that, these two DRM schemes are very different because they have very different terms.

      First off is how the DRM is licensed. CSS is licensed to any manufacturer who wants to use it for a flat "Reasonable And Non-Discriminatory" fee. FairPlay on the other hand is only licensed to companies that Apple chooses to license it to, and so far they have been extremely reluctant to license it to anyone at all. There are dozens of companies that I can buy a DVD player from. There is exactly one that I can get a FairPlay protected movie player from.

      Secondly is how devices are authorized. With CSS it is the manufacturer who is being authorized. Any device the produce is therefore authorized out of the factory and is not particular to me. With FairPlay it is the user who must be authorized, and thus each of my devices must be authorized online with Apple, and will only play my songs. I can resell my DVDs, I can't resell my FairPlay protected movies. Even if DVD players stop being produced altogether, then I can still buy used DVD players. If Apple goes out of business then buying a used player won't help me play any of my protected movies, because I can't get the player authorized.

      Lastly, DVD is simply more widespread than FairPlay H.264. I know that DVD is going to be around for years to come, whereas FairPlay H.264 might take off, but it might go the way of BetaMax. Plenty of products fail - it's just part of business but DRM has greatly increased the risk to early adopters.

      So seeing as how the longevity of my media is most important to me, then DVDs are a much better bet at this point compared buying stuff off iTunes.

      As for the other points. Doubting the longevity of a brand new video scheme is not a "post apocalyptic fantasy":) Sure, by now FairPlay AAC is widespread that enough that even in the worse case scenario, there would be enough angry people that something will be done to allow them to play their music. But this is still new, and it is too early to see what will become of it. As far as portables go, I have no desire to watch movies on a screen that is smaller than the physical DVD itself, so re-encoding to copy onto a small device isn't a concern for me. WMA is no worse than FairPlay, if you choose a decent service. Being equally bad I won't use either - especially as long as better options are still around.

      Which comes to the root of my dissent - all the DRM apologetic arguments boil down to stating that 'it isn't that much worse than what we have now', or 'it's not as bad as it could be'. But that doesn't change the fact that it is still worse :) I have no interest in change for the worse. I'll keep using what I'm using until something better comes along.

      cheers

  150. Needed: Quicktime 7.0.3 by mblase · · Score: 1

    I got a Mac, and was not too surprised to see that iTunes 6 wasn't under Software Update. So I downloaded it from http://www.apple.com/itunes/ and had no installation problems, but when I started the new app it told me I needed to download Quicktime 7.0.3 -- from Software Update. Which didn't have it yet.

    Fortunately, the Apple Quicktime page at http://www.apple.com/quicktime/ did have it for download, albeit without any fanfare.

    Just an FYI for ambitious upgraders.

    1. Re:Needed: Quicktime 7.0.3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iTunes 6 runs just fine with out Quicktime 7.0.3. You only need to update Quicktime if you want to watch videos in iTunes.

    2. Re:Needed: Quicktime 7.0.3 by Dragon+of+the+Pants · · Score: 1

      Software Update worked fine for me. Got both QuickTime and iTunes.

  151. kinda small by phobos258 · · Score: 1

    anyone else think a 2.5" screen is a little small to really enjoy watching video? I'm all about watching tv shows on my own time. thats why i MythTV. i dont need to take the mindless episodes with me everywhere i go. neet toy. but thats it, a toy.

    --
    getting analy penetrated is not my idea of a good friday
    1. Re:kinda small by pressman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yup! It's lousy for movies and television. However, for getting information on your way to work... much like a news program ornews paper it's great! I run a website called http://www.storypipe.com/StoryPIPE. that is all about short-form narrative and music content. We're hoping that peoples' time constraints and short attention spans will play into this new device.

      We will be setting up a "video blog"... I know I hate the term too, but we will have an RSS feed shortly that will be updated with new content daily that is perfect for your morning commute or a "sanity break".

      I've been going on for months that this device would come out and they kind of hamstringed us by getting it out so early. I'm busy scrambling to re-encode everything to play on it right this very second.

      --
      Pooty tweet
    2. Re:kinda small by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      We're hoping that peoples' time constraints and short attention spans will play into this new device.

      Great. I guess I'm the only one who thinks news reports are terse enough already. Can't we get an "in depth" story that lasts for more than 2 minu... sorry, what was I saying?

    3. Re:kinda small by pressman · · Score: 1

      Well, that's where 60 MInutes, 48 Hours and all the investigative shows come in. That's what NPR is for. That's what newspapers are for. In depth reporting still exists, it's just the video iPod is not the proper medium for it.

      --
      Pooty tweet
  152. But what FORMATare the videos in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can we just import apropirately formatted video into these new iPods? What is the format? Do you have to import via iTunes? I'd LOVE to be able to put some of my TiVo'd shows into a video ipod and watch them durning my commute. It'd eat battieries I'm sure, but that's okay. So again I say: what's the video format?

  153. What about my music videos? by endersdouble · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This looks damn cool. But I've seen similar things before--friends have had mp3 players with video screens, and so on, and in all cases, video had to be reencoded to be watched. Is that still true? Because I've got a couple hundred gigabytes of...ahem...perfectly legal video data ripped off DVDs I own as backups...and while it'd be awesome to be able to just seamlessly drop my Scrubs/Buffy/NIN videos onto a new iPod and watch it (2 inch screen isn't great, but better than nothing) if I have to reencode it for a couple hours first, then count me out...

  154. Frontseat Video Illegal in California by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Here in Collie-Foneya, it's been illegal for a year or two to have video screens in the front seat of a car, except for a few applications like navigation systems and rear-view-camera displays. You can have video in the back seat, to keep your kids entertained (probably a *positive* safety feature), but not the front. Using the iPod to feed a backseat display would probably be ok; using it to play music in the front is probably ok. But playing videos in the front seat is illegal.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  155. A warning to mac users- QT 7.0.3 by huxrules · · Score: 2, Informative

    When apple came out with Quicktime 7.0.2 many mac users had problems with MATLAB and other programs. I specifically had problems with MATLAB (would crash on start) the fix was to roll back to 7.0.1 using a reinstaller on apple's website. Anyways this new Itunes 6 seems to update to 7.0.3 (thats what is says on my xp box)- I don't know if it will cause problems. Mac users might want to check www.macfixit.com to see if their programs are affected. For myself I am just going to avoid upgrading- as I need to use MATLAB more than I need to watch Lost!

  156. Yah, crappy summary by billybob · · Score: 1

    Yah, it was pretty much a horrible summary. My guess is _am99_ couldn't keep his cock in his pants and posted that as soon as the ipod was announced, which was the first of 3 or 4 somewhat major announcements. Luckily the slashdot editors are lazy bastards and didn't go out and see if anything else was announced. I think frontrow is a lot more interesting than the stupid iPod video... wow I can watch video on a 2.5" screen, that's so amazing.... ho hum.. :P

    --
    Joseph?
  157. $2 TV Shows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To me $1.99 seems like a lot to pay for somthing everyone is used to getting for free. Sure its minus commercials, but I really dont see it being sustainable as software DVR is becoming more popular. Its uncommon for me to watch a tv episode more than once or twice so i see no point in 'owning' a tv episode. It is legal to record a tv show when your intent is to watch it at another time.

  158. Stevie Wonder by freaktheclown · · Score: 1

    Well, Apple now has the full Steve Wonder collection on iTunes. I am sure Stevie is THRILLED with the new iPod Video!

  159. Only in North America by EnglishTim · · Score: 1

    Only in North America, it seems. The UK iTunes 6 only offers music videos and shorts.

    1. Re:Only in North America by Stuart+Gibson · · Score: 1

      And even those are priced at £1.89, which at the current exchange rate is $3.31. You thought the pricing for the tunes was bad?

      Stuart

      --
      It's all fun and games until a 200' robot dinosaur shows up and trashes Neo-Tokyo... Again
  160. UNCYCLOPEDIA.ORG by RecycledElectrons · · Score: 1

    Uncyclopedia.org is supposed to be full of hoaxes. It's a parody of Wikipedia.org that allows hoaxers to enjoy themselves without vandalizing the real wiki.

    Nobody has pointed this out so far...what has happened to /.??? Doesn't anyone look at the web site to see what it's about? Would you have to read the content of an article on TheOnion.com to see if it was a parody?

    Stop what Linus called the "yanking" and start reading, and only posting when you have something interesting to say.

    Andy Out!

  161. No problem... by mblase · · Score: 2, Informative

    As long as I can put my own videos (e.g. recorded with a TV capture card) on the iPod, this is awesome. If it's for the store only, forget it.

    You can add any digital video to iTunes 6 (and to iTunes 5?), as long as it's Quicktime-playable. Presumably anything you have in iTunes will then sync with your iPod. So yeah, it looks like any video you record yourself can go to your video iPod.

  162. Re:Finally... there *are* TV shows available by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

    "ABC has LOST and Desperate Housewives up for $1.99 in itunes right now..."

    Too bad the BBC were too stupid to go in on the ground floor and offer *Doctor Who* for commercial download here in the States through iTunes. You'd think they'd have a clue considering they hosted this presentation via videofeed in the U.K., but alas, no clue.

    Way to let the fan base down, Beeb. Or is it dweeb?

    --
    "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
  163. Speaking of Retrofits... by drjzzz · · Score: 1

    Thinner, no, but any chance a brand-new color iPod could be upgraded to video? The screen resolutions and capacities are similar.

    --
    to err is human, to forgive is divine, to forget is... umm...
  164. Apple's going to fix USB! Hooray! by argent · · Score: 1

    Presumably this means that they're going to come up with new USB drivers for OS X that actually work reliably. I can't wait!

  165. Aquachannel by Peeptophe · · Score: 0

    Wow, aquachannel must be pretty slow to posting news. There isn't a single new car added since over a week ago.

    I wonder why the Prius hasn't been added yet?

    --
    * Si hoc legere scis numium eruditionis habes *
  166. iPorn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    iPod G5: Code name: iPorn ;-)

  167. Then why the announcement from IBM? by reptilicus · · Score: 1

    IBM announced that they existed after Apple announced the Intel switch. Why would IBM go public with such a huge lie?

    http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20050708-5073 .html

  168. What To Call Podcasted Video Downloads? by meehawl · · Score: 1

    Thanks to the Apple Herd Effect, I assume there will now be a critical mass of video-enabled personal media devices. Welcome, it's been a lonely three years or so without you on the bleeding edge.

    Anyway, now I assume that video RSS downloads, ala "podcasts", will now gain traction. What to call them? Will they still be "podcasts", or "vidcasts", or "podvids"?

    --

    Da Blog
  169. Right time? by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

    I bet if you walk into that store tomorrow, you'll still see some eMacs. At a reduced price, as well. There were plenty of minis lying around a week after the Nanos were announced. Perhaps Apple will give you a refund of the difference between what you paid and the new clearance price.

  170. Re:Finally... there *are* TV shows available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "LOST" is not something I'd put on a video player, since I currently use my iPod for long plane trips.

    But hey, that's just me!

  171. People on mobile phones are already a hazard by Shakes268 · · Score: 1

    Imagine someone driving to work, doing her make up, drinking a cup of coffee, talking on the phone all while catching up on the latest episode of Days of Our Lives. There are some places technology like this becomes more of a distraction than entertainment.

  172. What the new iPod can play by mblase · · Score: 2, Informative
    For those who care, this is from one of Apple's Quicktime pages at http://www.apple.com/quicktime/tutorials/creatingv ideo.html -- it follows a short guide about how to use new Quicktime 7.0.3 to export video to an iPod-ready format.

    By following the steps in this tutorial, QuickTime 7 Pro will automatically create an .m4v file containing H.264 video and AAC audio that is optimized for iPod. iPod can play the following video formats:

    H.264 video
    File formats: .m4v, .mp4 and .mov
    Video: Up to 768 Kbps, 320 x 240 pixels, 30 frames per second, Baseline Profile up to Level 1.3
    Audio: AAC-LC up to 160 Kbps, 48 KHz, stereo audio

    MPEG-4 video
    File formats: .m4v, .mp4 and .mov
    Video: Up to 2.5 Mbps, 480 x 480 pixels, 30 frames per second, Simple Profile
    Audio: AAC-LC up to 160 Kbps, 48 KHz, stereo audio
    1. Re:What the new iPod can play by iluvcapra · · Score: 1
      it follows a short guide about how to use new Quicktime 7.0.3 to export video to an iPod-ready format

      The most remarkable step is where you separate yourself from $29.99 to upgrade to QT Pro. Apple really should stop charging for that.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
  173. Screeeeeeeeach!!!! *crash* by Doomedsnowball · · Score: 1

    Oops! I was watching my iPod video instead of paying attention to the road. I think the Apple engineers are spending too much time influencing the Darwin awards.

    --
    7h3$3 4r3n'7 7h3 Ðr01Ð$ ¥0 4r3 £00|{1n9 f0r. M0v3 4£0n9. --OB1
    1. Re:Screeeeeeeeach!!!! *crash* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No problem. While your lying in bed at the hospital you can use the Video Out on your iPod video to catch up on your latest shows.

  174. I wonder if they'll stay ad free... by crovira · · Score: 1

    Except for Apple ads of course.

    That's an opportunity to spread blogs to home-grown audio (I'm listening to Otaku Generation as I write this) to video (I wish I could remember the URL) to media in general.

    Screw Rupert Murdoch, the **AAs and the labels.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
    1. Re:I wonder if they'll stay ad free... by FireBreathingDog · · Score: 1
      Screw Rupert Murdoch, the **AAs and the labels.

      What's Rupert Murdoch got to do with this?

  175. Re: external modem by johnrpenner · · Score: 1

    i guess they expect most people will connect through highspeed
    or wireless, because they put in the video camera, and pulled out
    the modem (its now an external usb adaptor cable).

    theiDoctor

  176. Already here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  177. And for us in the rest of the world? by gidds · · Score: 1
    Music is fairly international these days; everyone gets quite a lot of US music, you get quite a lot of UK music, and we all get bits and pieces from elsewhere. And yet it still took over a year for the iTunes Music Store to make it over here.

    TV is much more national. For example, I haven't even heard of most of the programmes that are being offered on the iPod, let alone have any desire to see them. (The last US programme I watched at all regularly was, erm, ST:TNG...)

    Any ideas how long it'll be before we'll be able to see UK TV programmes featured?

    --

    Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

  178. Why don't you write and produce one... by crovira · · Score: 1

    I mean, why not? (When enough people think that way and get some iTMS-like [or even the iTMS] to put them out, the **AAs are DEAD!)

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  179. pimp my ride iPod style? by phlegmofdiscontent · · Score: 1

    What's the big deal about cars that work with an iPod? I can use my girlfriend's iPod in my car just fine and it pre-dates the iPod by several years.

    1. Re:pimp my ride iPod style? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can use my girlfriend's iPod in my car just fine and it pre-dates the iPod by several years.

      Yeah, via what, an aux-in jack or kludgey CD changer connection? Where you have to use a remote or actually touch the iPod to control it, and you have no display other than what's on the iPod? Sure, that works, but it's far from an elegant solution.

      iPod-ready cars can (1) control the iPod via the head unit or steering wheel controls, and (2) display track info on the head unit. And they likely (3) let you keep the iPod out of sight in the glove compartment or arm rest while it's in use, instead of having to disconnect and stash everything every time you get out of the car-- lest you return to find a broken window and no iPod. I tried a few different ways of hooking my iPod into my car stereo, and finding something affordable that meets the three criteria above is damn near impossible. I ended up settling for no track info, but that's not really a big deal to me since I know all the songs in my regular playlist.

      Cars that offer plug-and-play iPod connections are a huge deal, because they help sell iPods, and dissuade people from buying other MP3 players-- and IMHO, anything that's a thumb in the eye of Windows Media is a good thing. Plus more iPods sold means more potential Mac sales, as I don't think anyone is still disputing the 'halo effect' theory, after yesterday's numbers (1.2M Macs sold in the last quarter, 48% growth over the same quarter last year). And since I'm a Mac consultant, more Macs sold means more business for me. :-)

  180. Coverage in the press by spagiola · · Score: 1

    I think it's a testament to the degree to which the iPod has entered mainstream culture that shortly after Apple's announcement the new video-capable iPod is covered on the main pages of the websites of major news organizations such as BBC, CNN, and the New York Times.

    1. Re:Coverage in the press by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      No it's a testimony to the fact that a lot of news is just regurgitated press releases, and if you attach a fat cheque then you can get it mentioned on the front page.

  181. No more modems by simpsone · · Score: 1

    Anyone else notice that the new iMac G5's have dropped the modem? There's a usb modem option for $49. Blazing ahead.

    1. Re:No more modems by mh101 · · Score: 1

      No different than when they dropped the floppy drive. I personally cannot remember the last time I used a modem.

      --
      Duct tape is like the Force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the universe together.
  182. humiliation builds character by earnest+murderer · · Score: 1
    Agree with the article poster - Lame. Not only is this a lackluster MP3 unit (which by virtue of being firewire will be limited to Apple Mac owners), but it has virtually no UI wizardry that might define it as an Apple product. A total waste of time.

    by http://slashdot.org/~Ars-Fartsica

    "Raise your hand if you have iTunes ... Raise your hand if you have a FireWire port ... Raise your hand if you have both ... Raise your hand if you have $400 to spend on a cute Apple device ... There is Apple's market. Pretty slim, eh? I don't see many sales in the future of iPod."

    by http://slashdot.org/~LoudMusic

    Goofy internal projects, expensive gaffes trying to "diversify" into areas it has only a tenuous relationship to, a complete inability to understand markets, and a constitutional immunity against learning from their mistakes. There is no future in a $400 (about $250 too expensive) firewire-only (5% of computer users) hardrive-based (read: fragile) mp3 player. Any one of these critical flaws might doom the product - take them all together and you have another classic corporate farce. When you see silliness on this level, though, normally you expect to see a raging egotist who is immune to common sense and criticism in some position of power in the company... oh wait, Steve Jobs. Never mind. This just reinforces my steadily growing sense of foreboding about Apple. Yes, I've said this before and been wrong, but I'll say it again anyway. They're living on borrowed time."

    by http://slashdot.org/~DaveWood

    --
    Platform advocacy is like choosing a favorite severely developmentally disabled child.
  183. Against the Law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are laws against running streaming video in the front seat of a car. There is no way this will take off from the vehicle manufactures.

  184. You can preview the whole video. by umrgregg · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm a little late on the uptake here, but did anyone else notice that you can preview whole music videos on iTunes?

    --
    NMG
  185. firewire ipod by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1

    Unless I'm mistaken, this looks to be the end for FireWire syncing with your iPod--it already wasn't compatible with either the Shuffle (natch), but also won't sync (but will charge) the "nano".

    The product spec page for this new iPod doesn't mention firewire sync capability, and it doesn't list the cable as an approved accessory. Too bad--one of the neat features of the iPod was that you could boot from it, with a FireWire connection; but I guess that's no more.

    Worse, are those Mac users--among them, myself--who have 3 year old Macs with either a) FireWire or b) USB 1.1. I guess it's no new iPods for me ;(

    --

    --
    $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    1. Re:firewire ipod by the_wesman · · Score: 1

      you think you've got it rough? I'm using a minimac, which has 2 USB and 1 firewire - do the math: keyboard, mouse, ipod ... my black-and-white screened ipod died about 6 weeks ago (the second one this year!) and apple lost my replacement, they graciously offered to upgrade me to the video model (when I talked to them last week they said they were going to get me the color 20GB, then yesterday I find out it's "a little on backorder" so either they screwed up or they were just stalling long enough to get me the new model) and I was super excited (that's right, I'm the first kid on the block with the new toy - told all my nano-waving friends to go to hell already) but now I realize I need to buy a USB hub, play the cable-swaparoo game or hook this thing up to my PC instead ... way to go apple - I was with you all the way, now I'm fucked - is this what I get for supporting your stuff? from a clamshell ibook, to a minimac, 2 ipods and this is how I get treated? thanks a lot....
      -w

      --
      calling all destroyers
    2. Re:firewire ipod by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1

      Uh, I believe you're trolling. If the keyboard came from Apple, you can plug the mouse into the built in USB port in every Mac keyboard since they starting supporting USB.

      If you're using a PC USB keyboard with no built in hub, what can I tell you. Maybe you should replace it with a BT keyboard instead.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
  186. Smart move making video standard by misterpies · · Score: 2, Insightful


    The genius move with the video iPod is that it's not a separate range. From now on, the regular iPod plays video too. That means that millions of people who would have just bought an iPod are now getting a video iPod. Millions will by a video player almost by default.

    Up until now, no-one has managed to shift portable video players because the customer doesn't see a need for them. But some time someone will work out how to make video on the move work, whether it's as a mobile movie library or some watch-on-the-move content. When that time comes, Apple will be in an unassailable position because they will have a virtual stranglehold on the videoplayer market already.

    You have to hand to Steve.

    --
    The author of this post asserts his moral rights.
  187. What's the ROI on a societal benefit? by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    Goddamit! That TV license makes me a shareholder! Auntie Beeb better stick it right proper to the Americans and give us all rebates! Oh, and put all the existing content online for free for the people who paid for it in the first place!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:What's the ROI on a societal benefit? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      The BBC *are* going to put all their existing content online.

      The plan is for 100% of BBC output to be downloadable within a year. They're already running the pilot schemes.

      The problem is just making sure that nobody from outside the UK can view it.

  188. Old style sharp-edges? by fbg111 · · Score: 1

    Wonder why the reverted to the hard/sharp edges of the original iPod? I like the roundcube version better...

    --
    Flying is easy, just throw yourself at the ground and miss. -Douglas Adams
  189. Re:Finally... Just downloaded Lost... some info.. by Hollinger · · Score: 5, Informative

    I just downloaded Lost. I figured $1.99 was worth seeing the video quality, finding out out the file size, and watching my favorite TV show of the season while I work. ;-)

    The file is indeed 320x240, and for 43 minutes and change, is 197 megabytes. The download took a little time; I'm not sure how much since I forgot to clock it.

    The video is compressed very well. It looks clear and crisp, and the audio sounds great. In fact, I scaled it up to full screen and had a cluster of people watching a few choice scenes (we were trying to identify the manufacturer of the reel-to-reel drives ;-) ). The video is very watchable.

    This will be interesting... I wonder what sorts of bonus material they will include?

    Also, its interesting to note that video is not very well integrated into iTunes (for Windows). For example, when I right-click on the file, it still says "Show Song File." Also, you'd think that Apple, being Apple, would stick my downloaded videos into another folder than "My Music" in "My Documents."

    These are small things. However, these are the things that Apple generally gets right.

    ~ Mike

  190. Re:Finally... new iMacs by OwnedByTwoCats · · Score: 1

    Why, oh why, oh why doesn't Apple offer an 1080 HD capable iMac? This is for the living room, right? Apple's 16:10 ratio would be a 1920x1200 display to show High Definition. Instead, buyers get to choose between 1440x900 (17" display), or 1680x1050 (19").

    The machines specs are nice enough: 1.9 or 2.1 GHz 64-bit G5, 512 MB RAM, built-in VGA camera (640x480), 802.11g wireless networking, gigabit ethernet, Radeon X600 Pro or XT with 128 MB on PCI-Express. 160 or 250 GB SATA HD. Slot-loading 8x SuperDrive (DVD+R DL/DVD±RW/CD-RW). No Modem. $1299 or $1699.

    I think I'm still looking for a machine with the same power as an iMac in a shoe-box sized case with no display. Sitting next to my Linux box, with a KVM switch.

  191. PornPod? by mlingojones · · Score: 2, Funny

    Strange that at the same time they released a video-capable iPod, they release an iMac with a built-in webcam. It's the ultimate porn combo!

  192. Re: DVD rips? by Redundant+offtopic+t · · Score: 1

    "when I put a new DVD into my computer, will it rip the DVD into a format i can put on my ipod?"

    Nope--primarily, I imagine, because ripping DVDs is illegal in the US because of the DMCA. --you are circumventing the copy protection. Stupid, I know, especially when you supposedly own the DVD.

    I have a couple concert DVDs that I wanted ripped, so I used MacTheRipper. Works quite well. After ripping, you'll need to translate the mpeg2 (or is it 1?) DVD video into either H.264 or MPEG4 (plus aac-lc (whatever -LC is) for audio). Dunno what shareware can do that.

    Also, from the apple page specs, the ipod's decoder can handle only up to 480x480 MPEG4 or 320x240 H.264. Not exactly full rez.

  193. Video Size by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I purchased a video from the store and opened it with QuickTime. The video scales with incredible resolution. I had it open full screen on my 17" LCD display and the quality was incredible. So don't open the purchased videos with iTunes, open it in QuickTime and view it full screen with great resolution.

  194. iTunes 6 fails.... by dethl · · Score: 1

    Ok, it looks a bit different, I'll give Apple that....But I would like an application that manages both my music and my movies (divx,xvix, etc...). Apple came a step closer with iTunes 6, but it looks like only for movies I download from iTMS. That is lame.

    --
    "Some fight for law. Some fight for justice. What will you fight for? One day, you will see."
    1. Re:iTunes 6 fails.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try dropping an MP4 or H.264 video on the "Library" icon in the source window.

  195. Re:Finally... there *are* TV shows available by vertinox · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sounds like it's exactly like the DRM for music, except you can't burn actual DVDs. Until someone posts the workaround next week.

    If it is quicktime video all you have to do is just convert it to an *.m2v or some other MPeg2 format. You can buy a Quicktime codec to do this or use Final Cut Pro. Then you have make a DVD image through some type of program than can ecode a DVD disc. (like DVD Studio) If you actually have paid for DVD Studio Pro you can then burn it to DVD. Otherwise, you can use roxio to burn the image and I think later macs support this nativley...

    However, you can most likely find third party apps to do this all for free because if you actually paid for Final Cut Pro and DVD studio like I did then you out of $2,000 right then and there and just to make DVD out of stuff you download from the net is just not worth that price tag (making your own videos/movies is, but I sometimes wonder why I didn't just buy alcohol instead seeing my creative talent was not that great)

    However it would have just been nice if Apple supports burning to DVDs through iDVD, but I doubt it.

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  196. Don't forget!! by Snaller · · Score: 1

    Well, there's MPEG4, MPEG4 and MPEG4

    And MPEG4 !

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  197. There is a reason for that by Snaller · · Score: 1

    Its a MAC - who cares about them ;)

    (Apple aren't takin on microsoft, they haven't the stats - now Google on the other hand...)

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  198. Enough by delphipro · · Score: 1

    Is anyone else tired of having to remove the System Tray and Quick Launch icons that get installed everytime you update iTunes? They used to be nice enough to give you an option they would just ignore. Now they give you no option and just do it. If Microsoft did this shit you'd be all over them.

  199. Streaming video from today's presentation... by antdude · · Score: 1

    Click here.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  200. With hindsight.... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    .... your vision will be generally 20/20

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:With hindsight.... by dangitman · · Score: 1
      .... your vision will be generally 20/20

      This is true, but it doesn't excuse the totally outrageous claims that are simply based on zealotry and simple-mindedness - like "Apple is going under" or "the iPod sucks" or "It's all because of Steve Jobs' ego, he's running the company into the ground.

      Even at the launch of the original iPod, it was clear that such commenters had no real insight into Apple, and had not used the products. They just had a chip on their shoulders.

      In contrast, one could be excused for being wrong, if one wasn't so ignorant and aggressive in their original predictions. Those with more moderate positions were less wrong. Many people thought it would be a success, but very few realized just how much of a success.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  201. iTunes 6 thoughts. by bobinabottle · · Score: 1

    Softened window corners. Check.

    Fixed bug where you could only see shared music if you had the radio turned on in prefs. Check.

    Ability to disable music store and any new video features in prefs. Check.

    Overall a great update :-)

  202. Only a small update by momerath2003 · · Score: 1

    Interestingly, with iTunes 5.0.1 already installed on my Mac, iTunes 6 is only a 618 kB upgrade as shown by the installer! This means that almost all of the content is already there, as has been indicated by rumor sites and people noticing video icons etc. inside the package.

    --
    I had but a simple dream, to destroy all humans.
  203. apple wankintoss by HdotNET · · Score: 1

    *yawn* ipod connectivity make me buy a car not

  204. Re:Finally... there *are* TV shows available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Let's not forget that Disney/ABC owns ESPN, so maybe it won't be long before sporting events are part of the lineup.

  205. Re:Finally... there *are* TV shows available by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1

    I'm in a frelling cult, you insensitive clod!

    --
    Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
  206. There already is such software by 5n3ak3rp1mp · · Score: 1

    It's called HandBrake and it works awfully well, actually. I'm ripping most of my DVD collection with it just for convenience. H.264 encoding is slow, but it works, and you can pick any destination rez you want... it has a very nice interface. I can't wait to try some of its output on one of these iPods...

  207. OT:Re:Classic iPod quotes by MightyYar · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    That's just crazy - guns should not be allowed on airplanes, if only for the reason that they would cause a rapid depressurization unless special shattering bullets are used.

    Why do you have to be a "gun advocate" or a "gun opponent"? Why can't you be reasonable and just accept that there are places where guns are safe and/or necessary, and places where they are completely unacceptable? Ranchers need guns. Hunters need guns. In New York City, even the cops shouldn't be allowed to have guns. How can you justify guns in a setting so crowded that there is a good chance of hitting someone unintentionally?

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    1. Re:OT:Re:Classic iPod quotes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How can you justify guns in a setting so crowded that there is a good chance of hitting someone unintentionally?
      oh, thats easy, you just need to aim better.
      </gun loving retard>
    2. Re:OT:Re:Classic iPod quotes by GlenRaphael · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      guns should not be allowed on airplanes, if only for the reason that they would cause a rapid depressurization unless special shattering bullets are used.

      I'm sorry, but that would of yours is just nonsense. It is highly unlikely a bullet fired on an airplane would cause rapid depressurization. A few bullet-sized holes wouldn't lose air faster than the plane's pressurization control system can put more in. Hearing damage to the people nearby is a more significant concern. Here's a nice FAQ on the subject.

      (I'll grant that it happens in the movies, mind you. But movie physics is not real-world physics.)

      One can justify guns in such a setting because the benefits - protection against bad guys - outweigh the cost - risk from stupid guys. Just like a pocketknife, guns have a very very low probability of accidentally leaping out of somebody's pocket and being used with malevolence. If a gun is being used, there's probably a reason for it, and in most situations where there's a reason for it you're better off having the gun there than not.

      One could imagine a world in which the laws of physics made gun use on modern airplanes a catastrophically bad idea, but that isn't the world we actually live in.

      --
      I play Nerd-Folk!
    3. Re:OT:Re:Classic iPod quotes by MightyYar · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Okay, so even if I take the article from a pro-gun site and believe what it has to say, a regular bullet still has a risk of overpenetration, and of hitting innocents. Guns still don't belong in the crowded environs of an airplane.

      Guns are not pocket knives. A pocket knife can be used to injure 1 person at a time, and only at close distance. A gun can injure at least 6 - and even a single-shot rifle can injure from a long range. There is very little danger of hitting an innocent with a knife. Protecting against bad guys? I'm sorry, but while that argument may fly in a scattered population, it just doesn't work in a crowded urban environment. Contrary to what happens in movies, you probably won't get shot if you just give up your wallet and let the crackhead go kill himself with drugs. I've been mugged at gunpoint before. It sucked, but I dealt. Most of the violence in urban settings is gang warfare, and a lot of innocent people get hit by idiots that don't know how to fire a gun. Want to bet how many urbanites with guns have ever been to a range? I've only been to a range once, and shooting the 45 was hard work! The 9 was easier, but I still didn't have much in the way of aim. My friend joked that people running downhill from me had better look out! :)

      The Constitution was designed to be a very fluid document. The largest city at the time was what, 50,000 people? The founding fathers seem like they were pretty pragmatic - in fact not even adding the bill of rights until pressured by the states. Would the states have pressed for "the right to bear arms" if they had modern urban centers? I highly doubt it. Not to mention the average gun was several feet long and fired one shot!

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    4. Re:OT:Re:Classic iPod quotes by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      He's basically trying to use the old 'guns make people safer' argument that I was attempting to lampoon in my journal entry. Unfortunately, some people are so brainwashed by the 'more guns make people safer' fallacy that they can't even recognise sarcasm when used to riddicule them. Let me put it this way. The argument for guns is that if someone broke into your house, you'd need a gun to protect yourself. The argument against guns is that if the person breaking into your house doesn't have a gun, and you know that he's unlikely to have one, you'd be a lot safer tackling him by other means, less likely to be shot, and fewer people are going to end up dead. If I accidentally disturbed a burglar in my home now (in San Francisco) I'd probably kiss my ass goodbye. I once disturbed a gang of four burglars in my house back in England, whereupon I ran after them with a hurling stick and chased them into next week. If you live in a society, like in England, where guns are rare, fewer people die in gun-related crime. It may sound like common sense, but unfortunately there are people out there who need this explained to them.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    5. Re:OT:Re:Classic iPod quotes by GlenRaphael · · Score: 1
      No, the primary argument for guns is that they are an equalizer - they allow people who are physically small, or female, or handicapped, or old, to defend themselves from criminals. "tackling" is not an option when the attacker outweighs you by over a hundred pounds; "shooting" still is. One woman can easily scare off a rapist or mugger with a gun. Guns might not make /you/ safer, but they make women safer. So if you want a reasonable compromise, make it legal for /women/ to carry guns anywhere and everywhere. "guns make people safer" clearly isn't "a falacy" when applied to women.

      The percentage of people victimized by assault is about twice as high in the UK as the US. the percentage victimized by rape is also about twice as high. Burglaries per capita are about twice as high too. Yeah, homicide is still higher in the US, but total crime victimization is significantly worse in the UK.

      As a law-abiding citizen, I don't care whether criminals have guns, I care whether I'm likely to be a victim of a crime and whether I can feel safe walking the streets at night. Currently the US is safer than the UK by those measurements - prevalence or lack of guns notwithstanding.

      --
      I play Nerd-Folk!
    6. Re:OT:Re:Classic iPod quotes by MightyYar · · Score: 1
      The statistics you quote do not prove anything about guns. Indeed Canada, which is armed to the teeth, has almost twice the assault rate of the US. Statistics such as these can reflect everything from the demographics of the country, to the emphasis on law enforcement, to the likelyhood that a crime will be reported, or even simply that the US has a huge proportion of its population in prison. Indeed, as you state, our homicide rate is twice as high, which you dismiss as being only one of four crimes - but I think all would agree that it is the big daddy of them all. Like I said, I was robbed and am unhappy about it, but I sure as hell am glad I wasn't killed. In my particular case, had I rounded the corner and been carrying a gun, now those crackheads would have my wallet AND a gun. Also, as you might remember, the US crime rate is hovering around the lowest it has been in 40 years (thanks largely to law enforcement efforts in New York). Your argument based on these statistics would vaporize if we substitute early 90's data.

      It's great that your gun makes you feel safe, but it does not make me feel safe. If you shoot that thing anywhere in Manhattan, you are very likely to hit someone - or even just something more valuable than the contents of your wallet.

      Guns are just one "equalizer". Did you know that single men are the most victimized group? That is because women tend to travel in groups for safety, and married people are usually traveling together. Only single men are likely to be walking alone. This is not where I first read it, but here is a Canadian article that describes similar surprising crime demographics (it's just the first one I hit on Google). There are shorter-range, non-lethal alternatives to handguns such as tasers and pepper spray that are also equalizers. I think in an urban environment, it is okay to be very careful about who carries a handgun.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    7. Re:OT:Re:Classic iPod quotes by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      As the other poster is pointing out, England is not safer than the US except for death :) Seriously, I think guns do have a place in a home if the owner feels unsafe, or possibly in a store during off-hours if the clerk feels threatened. There is some truth to "if guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns". But on an airplane? Nuts. On the street in an urban environment? Too dangerous. Even in the store that I mention above during normal daylight busy hours is a bad idea. Sometimes it's just best to let the bad guy get the stuff in order to avoid risking lives. You can replace stuff. Guns are over-rated for personal protection anyway. When I got mugged, the guys caught me off-guard and by surprise. No gun could have helped me... in fact since there were two of them, they didn't even need a gun.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    8. Re:OT:Re:Classic iPod quotes by GlenRaphael · · Score: 1
      By what metric is Canada "armed to the teeth"? It's certainly less so than the US.

      I've never owned a gun, I'm just saying I'd personally feel safer if more people carried them. Including on airplanes. In response to your query.

      Regarding "early 90s data", it seems like a point in my favor that all crime rates - including homicide rates - have been continually declining in the US relative to crime rates in the UK. If you think guns make us unsafe, it's hard to explain that.

      --
      I play Nerd-Folk!
    9. Re:OT:Re:Classic iPod quotes by MightyYar · · Score: 1
      I did not say "guns make us unsafe". That is exactly the sort of sweeping statement that I originally was decrying. In some situations, they make us safer. In some situations, they make life more dangerous. This is why both sides can point to data that supports their cause.

      As for the crime data, I already stated that there is more then one variable that influences crime rates - guns perhaps are one of those variables, but there is no way to point to the data and draw that conclusion. A fair conclusion would be: "It is possible for a country with a high gun possesion density to have lower property, assault, and rape reportings than a country with low gun possesion density." But that should be obvious without the data.

      Canada has something like a 5% gun ownership rate, whereas the US has something like 8%. Now, to be fair to your arguement, I think that Canada has far fewer handguns. My point was only to show that another gun-toting country is up there with the UK in crime statistics. My 1990's comment is also meant to show that something other than guns influences crime rate (though again, I am not ruling out gun ownership as an influence - just one of many). If you go even futher back in the time line, gun ownership steadily increased throughout the 80's, and so did crime (especially homicide). However, this correlation does not imply causation.

      My point? Guns are not "good" or "bad". They are a weapon that is superior to other weapons in some scenarios, and inferior than others. To be "against guns" is rediculous, because that is a hopeless argument - humans are tool makers, and weapons are a type of tool. But it is equally odd to argue that the mere presence of a tool makes us safer in all circumstances. It would be like always using chopsticks, even when eating soup. I am simply saying that handguns are not a particularly suiable tool where the density of people is high. They are a bit of a blunt instrument in close quarters. Sure, you could pour mercury down the storm sewer kill the sewer rats - but that's pretty damn irresponsible. I'm advocating pragmatism.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    10. Re:OT:Re:Classic iPod quotes by Axe · · Score: 1
      He's basically trying to use the old 'guns make people safer' argument that I was attempting to lampoon in my journal entry.

      Guns do make people safer. That is why police and flight marshalls carry them.

      I do agree that a private business might find it reasonable to restrict the ability and right for self defence on its premises - in exchange for a guarantee that it will provide safety.

      While your journal entry does provoke a discussion - it is nothing more then a provocation. Right to carry a dangerous object in some particular place has no direct bearing on your right for self defence and right to bear weapons.

      There are no cops where I hike, so I do carry a .44. In U.K. they would rather have you killed then allow a responsible person to carry a handgun. People in power only tend to protect symbols of their power - gun control originated in ancient times to keep slaves enslaved.

      INteresting fact - among 33 states with "must issue" concealed carry permits, permit holders are among the least likely to commit a crime.

      Another fact - criminals are afraid of homeowner guns more then the police. I guess that explain that burglaries, including occupied premises shot through the roof in U.K. after they established their gun control laws: totally inefective straw man tool for dishonest power hungry politicans to keep massed diverted from real issues.

      --
      <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
    11. Re:OT:Re:Classic iPod quotes by Axe · · Score: 1
      Indeed Canada, which is armed to the teeth,

      Bull. Canada prohibits handguns and concealed carry.

      --
      <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
    12. Re:OT:Re:Classic iPod quotes by MightyYar · · Score: 1
      They have a lot of rifles, though.

      Did you want to address my larger point, or are you planning to just pick off one detail - as if it was the keystone to my whole argument?

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  208. video on older iPods? nano video out? iMac PVR? by spage · · Score: 1

    Will older iPods support video at all through a firmware upgrade? What happens if you download a video to an older iPod? They have lower resolution screens but could still show something.

    The nano doesn't have TV out, but the new universal dock has S-video out. If you drop a nano onto it, can you display photos from it on a TV?

    At some point resistance is futile, just buy iPod + nano + Airtunes Express + iMac and worship Jobs (I'm not being sarcastic!). One missing piece is an iMac or Mac mini doesn't function as a PVR (although my Windows XP desktop with ATI All-in-Wonder crashes whenever I schedule a TV recording).

    --
    =S
  209. Re: DVD rips? by cadaeibfed · · Score: 1

    Handbrake will rip DVDs to MP4 or H.264, and it's free.

  210. Recording? by abonstu · · Score: 1
    Its pretty likely ive just been hiding under a rock somewhere, but does the Voice Recording section under 'Customisable Settings' mean the native can record through the minijack now?

    "# Voice recording settings:

    * Low (22.05 KHz, mono)
    * High (44.1 KHz, stereo)"

    44.1kHz stereo too... ive always had a grudge that something this high tech cant record (without some other dongle), though in all likelihood its just a bogus extra option for when you do have _that_ dongle attached.

  211. I think something's being overlooked here by Fuzzball963 · · Score: 1

    Even though a lot of you seem to be bitching and moaning about the quality of the video encoding encoding, I think we're missing the so called "bigger picture" here. The ThinkSecret article pointed out that there would be another iPod released later on in the year with a widescreen display and presumably with better encoding. Now while I don't have any evidence other than this article to support that, it would stand to reason from a marketing perspective that Apple would hold out on rolling that better version out, because you don't roll out the best product that you have and then be left without anything to build on it.
    So I think that they released this version as a primer for consumers, to get them accustomed to video on their iPod's, and then when they release the widescreen higher res version, people will be more willing to buy it.
    Just my take on it though :).

    --
    "The boy is dangerous, they all sense it, why can't you?"
  212. I think something's being overlooked here by Fuzzball963 · · Score: 1

    Oops, didn't see the double encoding typo till I posted it. Ah well, repeating things adds emphasis right :)?

    --
    "The boy is dangerous, they all sense it, why can't you?"
  213. Oh shut up please. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    There have been video players of all denominations (including portable TVs) for ages, I don't see everybody using one of those.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  214. Just For You by carou · · Score: 2, Funny

    One of the new features just introduced in the iTunes Music Store is "just for you" (beta) - a suggestion service which, given a record of what music purchases you've already made, will list some other albums you might like to try.

    Apple, being Apple, have approached this problem in a different way to the rest of the industry. Where their more pedestrian competitors might offer albums similar to the ones you already own, Apple's groundbreaking system leads me in a much more creative and original direction, offering albums from genres entirely unlike the albums I've bought so far.

    You bought The Shadows, Live at the Paris Olympia. We recommend Basement Jaxx, Kish Kash.

    You bought Vangelis, Heaven & Hell. We recommend Motörhead, Iron Fist.

    I think the internet will soon be abuzz with compliments to this most innovative scheme.

  215. How to play the downloads? by spewey · · Score: 1

    Well, of course I did not RTFA, but do you actually have to have the new iPod to view the video/tv content, or can you purchase it and view it in the new iTunes on a monitor, or through some other viewer on a PC. I have an iPod Shuffle but the screen resolution is very poor.

    1. Re:How to play the downloads? by mh101 · · Score: 1

      The videos from iTMS are not tied to the iPod. You can still watch them on your computer.

      --
      Duct tape is like the Force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the universe together.
  216. Re:Finally... there *are* TV shows available by jaseparlo · · Score: 1

    Nicko McBrian from Iron Maiden refers to it as the "Bleedin' Bodge-up Company".

    --
    All available data suggest that regardless of any of this, the sun will still come up tomorrow.
  217. Forced upgrade? by iowannaski · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From the iTunes 6 readme - "After purchasing music from the iTunes Music Store with iTunes 6, you will also need to upgrade your other computers that purchase music from the iTunes Music Store to iTunes 6"

    Is this something new? I have an old computer running iTunes 4.8, and I'd rather not upgrade unless I find something worth upgrading for. I'd like to give iTunes 6 a spin on my iBook, though.

    Have they upgraded the DRM or something?

    --
    i forget
  218. Re:Finally... there *are* TV shows available by jaseparlo · · Score: 1

    Argh McBrain not McBrian!

    --
    All available data suggest that regardless of any of this, the sun will still come up tomorrow.
  219. Terrible! by fbg111 · · Score: 1

    Oh hell, this is terrible, now I'll never get any work done! At least with music and podcasts I could work and listen at the same time. But with video, no way! Now my after hours productivity, when I get most of my work done anyway, will be shot to hell! Note to Steve: Oh please oh please don't put last season's Battlestar Galactica and Firefly up on iTMS!

    --
    Flying is easy, just throw yourself at the ground and miss. -Douglas Adams
  220. Looney Toons! by jcr · · Score: 1

    The main thing I buy on the iTMS is songs from the back-catalog, that I just can't find in a record store. I never had a copy of "A Whiter Shade of Pale" or "Stagger Lee" before the iTMS went live.

    If the iTMS offered up a box set of 100 Looney Toons, I'd be all over that. No matter how many times I watch The Rabbit of Seville, it still cracks me up.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  221. Re:Finally... Just downloaded Lost... some info.. by Altima(BoB) · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One thing I noted was that I couldn't find a way to get the video to full screen from within iTunes. I opened the file from my paid copy of Quicktime to go full screen.

    Anyway, as you say, the compression is impressive. For 100mb less than what you'll find on bittorrent (albiet not in 16:9) you get the whole program without ads, and also (and this is in my opinion pretty big) no intrusive messages along the bottom or top of the screen placed by the television network. It's one of the most obnoxious and annoying practices on U.S. TV (a network bloated with advertising places MORE advertising along the screen's margins during programming? No thanks.) If you were to download what is basically a TV rip from Bittorrent, these advertisements are unavoidable even if the normal ads are cut.

    The quality looks just as good as what you're likely to find on BT, as is the sound. I even put it on fullscreen on my 23" cinema display, it still looks great. I give this a thumbs up. Not having seen more than a couple epsidoes of the original Lost, I'm tempted by the $34 download of season 1, a little cheaper than the DVD, but no extra features and lower res... Decisions decisions...

    --
    Yup...
  222. Re:Finally... there *are* TV shows available by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

    unlikely. Have you any idea how complex sports licenesing is for video? There would be so many restrictions on this it would be very difficult to implement. Besides, not as many people want to watch a recorded football/baseball game.

  223. Re: DVD rips? by Redundant+offtopic+t · · Score: 1

    cool--thanks! It even does audio transcoding.

  224. Is it widescreen of fullscreen? by Augusto · · Score: 1

    One thing that annoys me about Lost is that I don't have an HD TV and I have to see it in fullscreen. Would be great if the ipod version was widescreen. Is it?

    --

    - sigs are for wimps.
    1. Re:Is it widescreen of fullscreen? by n8_f · · Score: 2

      No, it is 4:3. Another strike against it. Like I said, this is no where near ideal, but I think it is worth checking out and I might support it (i.e., start getting Lost) just so we can get closer to that ideal. The quality isn't great, but it is good enough for now and within a year, if this goes well, we should see some huge shifts in content. Unlike the RIAA, the TV studios have a *huge* incentive to do this. Their shows are already paid for, so this is pure profit for them. And this could be huge for small cable channels that produce their own content. Obviously HBO is a prime candidate, but I think that Comedy Central would make a ton of money with the Daily Show (and perhaps the Colbert Report). I know a bunch of people like me who don't get cable or don't have Comedy Central, but love the Daily Show and beg me to show them any I've downloaded. I would much prefer to download them legally, especially since I could get a few friends to pitch in to defray the costs. This could allow shows that aren't commercially viable in a broadcast or cable environment to get made. This is going to be a huge shift in content creation, because viewers are going to start deciding what gets made, not advertisers. If this were available a couple of years ago, Firefly, the Family Guy, and Futurama would never have gone off the air.

  225. Steve Jobs has addressed the problems. by Inoshiro · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As I posted 4 days ago, Steve Jobs said in the keynote last year that he had some reasons to not release a video iPod.

    Size -- other poratables are too big.
    Weight -- they also also too heavy.
    Content -- there is no content to put on it. Copyright issues are everywhere!
    Output screens -- they are simply too small for video.

    "So how could that change?" I asked.

    Simple!

    The iPod video is smaller than the previous iPod photo; it is also lighter.

    In terms of content, Steve Jobs has managed to secure a couple of deals to get music videos and TV shows into the iTunes store, and has provided home-grown content in the form of video pod casts. To help facilitate the production of video podcasts, he has included the iSight into every new iMac.

    Watching the video is also as he wanted -- you can watch it on your computer in a unified interface via front row (with remote!), watch it directly on the iPod, or even watch it on a TV-out cable they have for the iPod video.

    I think it also hints at where he'll be going in a few years. Now that you can get a nice H.264 movie trailer on your TV via front row, who's to say you won't be able to buy a complete movide for 6-8$? I'd love to be able to get a high quality, digital movie online. New release movies on DVD are about 20-30$ CAD -- too much for what you get. Hell, I could go to the theatre for less even with watery drink!

    But if I could get movies that just came out for 6-8$ and watch them on my wonderful home theatre, I think I'd do it. I'm not too into 2$ music videos, but 2$ for a TV show isn't too bad. Why should I spend 80-100$ on a DVD box set of a TV show, when I'd much rather have a digital version of it for 20-30$.

    With no manufacturing costs, the content providers get all the money -- no more middle men in China making all the DVDs and shipping them back and forth across the ocean!

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  226. New Griffin ITrip for 5th gen..Available in black? by Slashdot+Junky · · Score: 1

    Hey people,

    Do any of you know whether or not the new Griffin iTrip FM transmitter will be availble in black to better match the black 5th gen Ipod when it starts shipping later this month? The website doesn't even offer much info about the white finish pictured.

    Is there anything I should know about when selecting a FM transmitter for my car. Although I'd rather make the connection via cable to my factory stereo, the cost of doing so seems to be ridiculously high. Perhaps I not finding the right webpages.

    Thanks,
    Slashdot Junky

    --
    .
    Landfill Mining Co.
    Managing the (Un)natural Resources of Tomorrow
  227. Re:Finally... there *are* TV shows available by YOU+LIKEWISE+FAIL+IT · · Score: 1

    MENDOOOOZAAAAAAAA!!!

    --
    One god, one market, one truth, one consumer.
  228. Re:Finally... there *are* TV shows available by (startx) · · Score: 1

    Yeah, from what I've read it's just fairplay applied to video. About a week to compile a compatible version of JHymn and post it online sounds about right.

  229. a ripoff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why did no one state the obvious? 1.99 for a whole show and its still 99 cents for a song?

  230. PRODUCERS AND SHIPPERS OF ANIME, HEED THIS CALL by KanSer · · Score: 1
    It's not only music videos you can buy. No, Apple's set up to allow you to purchase TV shows for $1.99 apiece. Get Desperate Housewives or four other ABC shows premiering on iTunes at two bucks an ep. Videos are native QVGA resolution.


    Are you listening? Sell me episodes. Now. Not 25 fucking dollars for an import dvd with 2 episodes. Internet. 2 dollars.

    Now.
    --
    • MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward Wednesday April 20, @4:20
  231. The eMacs line is being replaced by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    with viMacs.

  232. Death of (HD)DVDs/BluRay? by Stu+L+Tissimus · · Score: 0

    When MP3 players first came out - Specifically the iPod - purchases of actual CDs plummetted. Most of the music buying market does it online now. Will it be the same for movies? I for one hope to see this as the end of the HD-DVD/BluRay feuds... Well, one can hope :)

    Oh, and Sony's PSP is more or less screwed. For $300 you can get a PSP with a 512MB memory stick and then buy movies for $10... or you could get an iPod with 60 times that much space for the same price and buy movies for $2.

    --
    A wise man once said, "wtf h4x."
    1. Re:Death of (HD)DVDs/BluRay? by mh101 · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, as the new iTMS doesn't have any movies on it.

      (yet...)

      What it does have, are music videos, Pixar shorts, and five TV shows, according to Steve's presentation.

      --
      Duct tape is like the Force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the universe together.
  233. Re:The Remote = Shuffle + Menu button = underwhelm by NutscrapeSucks · · Score: 1

    It doesn't really matter because an iMac is dorm room home theater at best. How far away will you be sitting from a 17" display? The keyboard will be close enough if you need it.

    --
    Whenever I hear the word 'Innovation', I reach for my pistol.
  234. wallMac by presearch · · Score: 1

    Although it didn't make a windfall for Gateway, Dell is now selling 42" plasma TVs for $2600.
    How wonderful if Apple would make one with the same form and price, but with iMac internals added.

  235. Fair Use goodbye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This isn't innovation...MovieLink.com has offered downloads of movies for sale for years and their quality is better. There have been myriads of video players. I had one of the first gen ones, the Archos JBM 20...funny how in 3 years, the only difference is that the video ipod's screen is a little bigger.

    I hope this doesn't take off because it will lock in a niche market since video encoding is time consuming so I could see people buying episodes and also buying the CD because they don't know how to convert it.

    Guys, this isn't cool. They're trying to erase fair use and make legit activity seem illegal.

  236. Re:Finally... Just downloaded Lost... some info.. by skiflyer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Help me out, because I'm genuinelly curious. For four more dollars you get the DVD with no DRM, which you can rip with free software down to a portable format, which comes on its own physical media in case you ever have to free up some harddrive space, which has all the extras (if you care). So in other words, you spend an extra 4 dollars and you get both versions.

    I don't get why you'd even consider the download. I see the value added in buying tonights episode of Lost if you missed it and want to watch it on the train tomorrow, but once it's out on DVD I'd need a much better price break than 11%... personally I would've expected pay per view kind of prices, 3-5 bucks for a movie, maybe 10 bucks for a season of Lost, I dunno if that would even cover cost of bandwidth, but it's about what it's worth IMO.

    Now, the real nice gadget is the Tivo (or whatever DVR) to IPod dock, so people who already have a DVR can take their TV shows on public transit and airplanes and such without paying again.

  237. Re:Finally... there *are* TV shows available by kabz · · Score: 1

    I already downloaded and watched the pilot of Night Stalker. The quality was *just* good enough to be decent on my 12" PowerBook at full screen, and really nice at double size.

    I expect this will look great on the iPod. The download was about 5 or 6 minutes. That's a while, but bearable.

    I think Apple have a winner with this, and ABC will make a large chunk of change at $1.99 x many downloads of the available material. Hopefully we will soon see other networks such as Fox and CBS jumping onto this, since they will not want to get left on the sidelines.

    I bet this was a really near thing for Apple, since there would not be nearly as good a story if ABC had not been on board.

    Ordering a black vPod was a no-brainer since I bet they will be in short supply come Christmas and will be at a premium on eBay.

    --
    -- "It's not stalking if you're married!" My Wife.
  238. Re:Finally... Just downloaded Lost... some info.. by kabz · · Score: 2, Informative

    Double-click to get a separate quicktime window from iTunes, then right-click or ctrl-click on the title bar and click 'full screen'.

    Hey presto, full screen video.

    --
    -- "It's not stalking if you're married!" My Wife.
  239. Re:Finally... Just downloaded Lost... some info.. by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, the reason I'd consider it is that it's just so damn convenient. However, I've also considered your points and I agree with you. Buying the DVD is a much better value when all is said and done. (I'm actually going to borrow the first season DVD from a friend. If I find that I can't live without it, I'll buy it.)

    Before downloading the first episode of Lost I'd never even seen it, and I wouldn't have bothered to buy, rent, or borrow it. I've downloaded the second episode on the strength of that, but as I said, I'm going to borrow the DVD. The point is that this is a great way to check out TV shows that I wouldn't watch otherwise and wouldn't go out of my way to watch.

    I normally watch very very little TV; one hour a week for me is a lot. I discontinued my cable last spring. TIVO isn't interesting to me because I don't watch enough TV to warrant owning a PVR (The idea of TIVO is interesting to me however). So, something like this is perfect. even if I never buy a Video iPod.

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  240. Could've sworn I heard this on NPR by qbasicnewbie · · Score: 1

    It's a sad day when you hear tech news on National Public Radio before you hear it on /. I mean, NPR even has a podcast now. Does /.? No. Probably because the editors really ARE monkeys, and cannot speak properly.

  241. Not since Eisner left by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Didn't Pixar decline to renew their contract with Disney?

    Yes, because Jobs and Eisner hated each other (and from what Eisner has done to Disney I'd say he wins the lothesome person award by a mile).

    However Pixar and Disney are talking again because Eisner is gone, as in not even on the board anymore. I'm sure that's what made this deal possible.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Not since Eisner left by Total_Wimp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sure that even with Eisner out Disney is gonna have to pony up with a better contract. My understanding of the current one is:

      Disney's responsibility:
      -Loan money to produce movie
      -Distribute movie through established distribution channels

      Disneys reward:
      Keep 50% of revenue

      Pixar's responsibility:
      -Make 100% of the movie
      -Pay 100% of the cost to produce the movie (pay back loan)

      Pixar's reward:
      Keep 50% of what's left

      If I'm misunderstanding this, let me know. But if this is the deal it'll take a lot more than ditching Eisner to put a signature on a contract.

      BTW, as a twist of fate it's interesting to note the roles are reversed for the iTunes venture. Disney makes the content and Apple is distributing it. You gotta wonder if Apple is keeping 50% of revenue for selling a hit show like "Lost".

      TW

    2. Re:Not since Eisner left by tkokesh · · Score: 1

      That's pretty close to the agreement, and Pixar would probably be OK with things if that were the continuing contract. (Given their track record, maybe they'd require a bigger piece of the pie after expenses, though.)

      However, Disney also gets the rights to the characters that Pixar creates, which will lead to the (almost certainly) direct-to-Disney-Video disaster "Toy Story 3" in 2008 (according to IMDb). I think Disney may also get 100% of the merchandising revenue, but I'm not certain about that.

      --

      A pride of lions.
      A gaggle of geese.
      A murder of crows.
      A vista of bugs.
  242. Clever by Doyle · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Apple have been pretty smart with this new iPod. The old mantra is "no-one wants to watch a movie on a portable player". Might be true - but Apple have sidestepped that issue by selling TV shows, not movies, at launch. TV shows are shorter (less tiring to watch on a small screen, quicker to download) and more profitable (TV shows already make money through advertising - this is just extra cash for them); and they don't compete so directly with DVDs like downloadable movies do (most of these shows will be offered for download before they're even available on DVD).

    Very smart.

    1. Re:Clever by JakeReed1 · · Score: 1

      Plus, even if you aren't interested in watching videos, the cost of the newer iPod is same as it previous model and it is a thinner design. I think Apple realizes that video capability is a feature that is more a bonus than a solid market foundation. If people considered video capability an absolute necessity in their music players, Archos would be dominating the market.

  243. Next day... by shmlco · · Score: 1
    Anothing thing for the non-Tivo'ites is that they say they'll have THIS season's episodes up the next day. Cool for those who miss a "can't miss" TV show.

    Now where is Galactica and 24???

    --
    Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    1. Re:Next day... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      I'll second that on Galactica

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  244. Communicate with Front Row? by freyzi · · Score: 1

    Can it be IR? Really? Apple using outdated tech... what's next, the Vinyl iPod.

    OK, IR uses very little battery-power. That's the only plus I can see. Bluetooth is the industry standard and all new macs have it.

    At the moment I use my SE K750i as a remote for my PowerBook and look forward to using the Front Row interface with it.

    Question is will Apple allow this or do we need to buy 20th century add-ons and remotes we can't use in the next room?

  245. sane, maybe by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

    I just built a system with 2-3x power on all specs (except the hd, I'll be adding a raid array later), for 4-500 less than this system. The 17" LCD isn't very desirable at $130, but people do buy them at that price. Bottom line? There's no reason at all that you should be paying $1300 for a computer with under 1gb of ram, especially in this time of superbloat. Semi-sane, yes. I'm just very happy with transparent case complete with overclock components, and all the extras.

    --
    "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
    1 John 4:14
    1. Re:sane, maybe by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      I just built a system....


      Most people are not going to build their systems. And how long did it take you to buy all the components, put them together, install the software (does it come with similar software as the iMac does?), overclock the components (you said that you overclocked the machine) etc. etc.? Maybe you paid less money, but you paid more time. Also, the iMac is a all-in-one solution, whereas the machine you built is propably a bulky tower-PC with a mess of wires hanging from it's back. How's the noise-levels on that overclocked machine of yours?
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    2. Re:sane, maybe by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

      Time is a factor, but you just missed my reference to overclocking. I bought overclock capable parts, and my system runs at normal speeds, still twice as fast as the iMac. This keeps it cool and quiet, well it will be quiet when I get a fan-resistance controller.

      You brought up a good point with all the wires hanging from the back, My notebook just can't do everything I need for fixing computers, formatting hard drives, programming small chips(serial port on that iMac by any chance?) etc. Who in their right mind would get an iMac when you can get a notebook for less? The iMac just doesn't fit the desktop computer profile, and likely the only reason it sells is because it's significantly less expensive than a (mac) notebook.

      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
      1 John 4:14
    3. Re:sane, maybe by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      Who in their right mind would get an iMac when you can get a notebook for less?


      Sure you could get a x86-notebook for less, or an iBook, but those x86-notebooks are not Macs, nor do they run OS X. And to some people (notably Mac-users), that does matter. and the iMac clearly outspecs the iBook (and PowerBook). It has a lot faster processor, a lot better screen, a lot faster (and bigger) HD, a lot faster vid-card etc. etc.

      Yes it does matter what OS you can use. Would you be happy if you could only run Windows95, even if some hardware-specs were better/price was lower? I bet not. And Mac-users would be pissed if they had to run Windows XP, an OS they see as clearly inferior to OS X. So they do not necessarily see that x86-hardware as an alternative to Mac.

      You could get a Ford Mustang that has more HP/less price than BMW does. Does that mean that the Mustang is better? No it does not. And people who buy BMW's would never consider the Mustang to be a valid alternative to BMW.
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
  246. Greedy solution to tv on the go by geekee · · Score: 1

    Id much rather plug a tuner card into my computer and have iTunes record the show for me, rather than paying $2 for something I could have gotten for free. I won't even mention synching with my DVR since Jobs won't support any device that isn't an Apple device. Who the hell wants to own most tv shows anyway. I usually delete them after Im through watching them.

    --
    Vote for Pedro
    1. Re:Greedy solution to tv on the go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what? You ropinion is so well thought out and expertly articulated that I'm going to throw away my 4 Mac's and buy a Dell. Thank you! Thank you! You've changed my life with your kneejerk opinion. You will be the savior of the video industry!

  247. Re:Finally... Just downloaded Lost... some info.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i don't have cable. i cannot afford it since i just bought a condo. it's great being able to watch the new episode of LOST for just two bucks.

  248. USB Car Stereo Inputs. by ithrax · · Score: 1

    Why by a whole new friggin car? How about I just buy a stereo like this?

    I like my Honda like it is. Old, beat up, fuel efficient, and best of all...paid for.

  249. Who needs iPodYourCar? by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1
    Seriously, it's not that hard. All you need maybe a few dollars and a trip to your local Fred Meyer general store unless you boxed yourself into a corner with a CD player stereo. Here's what worked for me, and not just with an iPod:

    --
    Help us build a better map!
    1. Re:Who needs iPodYourCar? by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      Meh, too ghetto.

      I want titling on my stereo head, controls integrated with the steering wheel, etc.

      There are very few (but, thankfully, slowly increasing) options to get this. BMW's thing is a hack, only AFAICR Alpine, Pioneer, Clarion and Mercedes have it done properly.

  250. stewart is killer app by MegaFur · · Score: 1

    I'd love if Jon Stewart could force comedy central to provide it's videos for video ipod.

    If the insanely unlikely were to occur--that is, if somehow, despite all the technical, logistical, and legal considerations, it were somehow possible to download full episodes of the Daily Show to the new video iPod the same day they aired on cable, then I would buy one.

    --
    Furry cows moo and decompress.
  251. Re:Finally... Just downloaded Lost... some info.. by Goth+Biker+Babe · · Score: 1

    The UK store doesn't have the TV shows. Not surprising since two of them, Lost and Desperate Housewives are both behind the US schedule and ABC would not want to lose potential broadcast revenue. It would be interesting to see whether I can purchase from the US store.

  252. Re:Finally... Just downloaded Lost... some info.. by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

    For 100mb less than what you'll find on bittorrent (albiet not in 16:9) you get the whole program without ads, and also (and this is in my opinion pretty big) no intrusive messages along the bottom or top of the screen placed by the television network. [...] If you were to download what is basically a TV rip from Bittorrent, these advertisements are unavoidable even if the normal ads are cut.

    I've never seen any "intrusive messages" in downloaded versions of Lost. The only thing marring those HDTV rips is a transparent ABC logo in the corner of the screen, but otherwise, the quality is far better than you can get from 320x240. It might just be a matter of time before the networks start cluttering up HDTV broadcasts with banner ads.. but for now, BitTorrent still seems like a better deal.

    Don't bother downloading the first season for $34, just get the DVDs. You can compress them down if you want to watch TV on the train or something, but still watch it at DVD resolution (and at the correct aspect ratio) when you're at home.

    --
    Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
  253. Re:Finally... Just downloaded Lost... some info.. by drsquare · · Score: 1

    197MB? I don't think will be much use for those of us without broadband. What are we supposed to do when all the TV comes over the Internet? And does this mean people are going to have to drag their computers into the living room, then put them next to the TV, making the room look a mess?

    Video over Internet might be the future, but knowing how over-engineered, over-complex and unreliable computers are, I don't look forward to it. It's pretty easy to turn on the TV, whereas watching TV via the computer is a chore. Also TV doesn't cost $2 a programme. Eventually you'll be able to get the DVD for that price.

    Perhaps 10-20 years in the future, there'll be unlimited broadband in every home like electricity or water. Then TVs will be Internet-enabled, you plug them into the Internet rather than an aeriel, then it automatically streams the TV. But technology isn't anywhere near that advanced yet.

    Cheap shot: If they got rid of all the meaningless, empty filler scenes from Lost, maybe they could get the file size down to about 5MB.

  254. Re:Finally... Just downloaded Lost... some info.. by valmont · · Score: 1

    valid points. I would however point out that i do value my own time, and time spent a the computer. Ripping DVDs, compressing, and managing those files is a cumbersome process, that takes-up too much my precious time, and eventually clobbers my hard drive far more than what i'll get off iTunes.

    but in the end, i need Apple to come-up with something similar to/better than Windows Media Center, i need a reasonably cheap external device where all that "Media" will live.

  255. Re:Finally... Just downloaded Lost... some info.. by Swano · · Score: 0

    Well, here in Oxford, the HMV have them both.

    Phil =)

    --
    Unix is user friendly... it just chooses it's friends selectively!!
  256. The BBC by Andy+Davies · · Score: 1

    The BBC seems to have taken a decision to go down this route long before 'Apple got a big content provider to agree to a different distribution method to broadcast TV'

  257. Orff vs. Black Eyed Peas by bennomatic · · Score: 1

    I noticed the same thing: You bought Orff: Carmina Burana. We recommend Black Eyed Peas:[whatever the new BEP album is].

    I'm thinking it must be a profiling system built on an odd sampling of data. The idea is that most people who buy from iTMS probably have 98% of their music on (and ripped from) CDs. Thus, they are only buying things that fill odd holes in their collection. Songs or albums they remember from their childhood and don't have on CD, ultra-new stuff they won't bother buying on CD, stuff they have on vinyl and which they are not inclined to digitize...

    I'm pretty much a rock-and-roll and indies kind of guy, but the odd holes I'm filling include: Orff, Hall and Oates, Fiona Apple's new album, Spearhead, and Cat Stevens Greatest Hits.

    The problem is that this is not only not representative of any group, it's not even really representative of my tastes today. It's representative of whims and nostalgia. I'm sure that lots of people bought Orff who also bought BEP, but that may be more of coincidence than reliable profile data.

    What would be more interesting would be if they could grab people's libraries and see what people actually have on their systems, not just what they bought on their store. I'm sure that some people would be hesitant to let Apple have that information, but from a technical standpoint, it would let them build a much better profile of what ownership of one album might imply about other albums someone might like.

    In fact, if they could combine that with play volumes and rating information, that could be awesome. I have three Tom Waits albums, but one of them (Blood Money) get's almost no play, and one of them I could listen to almost any time. The fact that I have them isn't a strong recommendation, but the fact that one of them really stands out as something I listen to a lot could be a recommendation, not only on its own, but in combination with other albums I listen to often.

    Along those lines, I would also like to see them get rid of the manual ranking system. I don't have time or inclination to label favorites. I think there are ways to do this automatically. To wit:

    - If you put a song into one or more playlists it gets at least two stars (.25 extra stars for each list it's in above one).
    - If you burn a list that the song is in, the song gets an extra .25 stars for the first burn, and .1 for each additional.
    - Each time you let the song play all the way through, it gets an additional .05 stars.
    - Each time you skip a song within the first 10 seconds, lower its ranking by .25 stars. Skipping after 10 seconds but before the last 10 seconds lowers its ranking by .05 stars.
    - Each time you listen to a song more than once in a row, increase its ranking by .5 stars

    I'm sure this list could be extended and refined, but that would be a great way to auto-rank songs, ongoing. It would let the system keep up with a person's tastes (i.e. I'm sick of that song, so I'll skip it), and it could also be used for better profiling.

    I know, I know... there's privacy issues there. But I would totally be willing to share this information if it would help me find music that I (a) will like and (b) wouldn't have found otherwise.

    --
    The CB App. What's your 20?
  258. eh? by Stu+Charlton · · Score: 1

    I've seen the HD H.264 Serenity trailer play well on an iMac G5 at the local Apple Store.... which is at least double the quality of DVD. it certainly is unplayable on my Powerbook, but I'm curious why an even smaller res H.264 would cause you problems.

    --
    -Stu
  259. Re:Finally... Just downloaded Lost... some info.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless you have a good reason not to, go with the Season 1 DVD set. It's worth it.

  260. Re:Finally... Just downloaded Lost... some info.. by agraupe · · Score: 1

    It's really not, after you perfect the technique or use a suitable script. I wrote a short (3 line) script that rips an entire DVD to a XviD file, where you specify the desired bitrate/filesize, and the audio track. It takes literally ten seconds to rip a dvd (not counting the actual encoding time, but you can do something else during that), and you end up getting a nicely compressed product.

  261. Re:Finally... Just downloaded Lost... some info.. by skiflyer · · Score: 1

    So what you're saying is that for you the price point matches the convenience factor of being able to what... watch it on your laptop without putting the DVD in? Or are you actually going to get a video IPod and watch it on the 2 inch screen?

    See to me that's the kicker. I don't actually need the compressed format, in fact, I'd prefer the better format... but if I buy the better one, I can always just compress it later should that need arise, however the opposite isn't true.

    I guess to me, the only thing I see is a noticeable increase in convenience of delivery and a noticeable decrease in quality, but those aren't equal commodities in my world, especially considering that the current delivery methods are pretty convenient in my area.

  262. Mac Mini Media Center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Add in Tivo-like capability to FrontRow, throw it on a mac mini, hook that up to a plasma screen, and you've got a kick ass media center going. Just add in 5.1 or higher audio out, and I'm buying one.

  263. One dissenting voice by stoney27 · · Score: 1

    It seems that someone has to say that the video iPod will be the down fall of Apple/Steve Jobs. However Phillip Swann, http://www.tvpredictions.com/ipod101105.html, logic: The video iPod was born from arrogance. Apple has been so successful with the audio iPod that it thinks it can't go wrong. But it will this time. This is an example of a technology that is being launched only because it can be, not because anybody wants it.
    This sort of sounds like the old story of IBM saying since there is no one using Coping machine in the business place there is no need for one. And telling a small company, Xerox, that they where not intrested in their new product.
    Just because no one else it doing it does not mean it should not be done...

    --

    It is said that a child learns wisdom from the parent,
    but the truly wise parent learns joy from the child
    1. Re:One dissenting voice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love the new iPod Video, but when the hell will we see the old Color iPods support video? It looks like it has the ability to!

      I love the iPod Nano as well, especially since I got mine free on this Conga site - looks like I will need to get a video one now for Xmas!
      http://conga.younify.com/ipodNano.asp

  264. Re:Finally... Just downloaded Lost... some info.. by Hollinger · · Score: 1

    To get full-screen, you can click an icon below the running video in iTunes. It pops up to full-screen regardless of whether you have QT Pro.

  265. Dr WHO bbc? by SethJohnson · · Score: 1



    a show which has already paid for itself via distribution in other markets!

    I apologize for posting a possibly very naive thought here. Since the BBC is funded through the annual TV tax paid by British citizens, isn't it actually true that Dr Who was already financed by that tax and the advertising revenue from it being shown in England? Internet-distributed sales of the show, like you say, is pure icing on the cake for the production company.

    Seth

    1. Re:Dr WHO bbc? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. The BBC does not have, and never has had, adverts.
      2. Neither of the Bs in BBC stands for England.

  266. 3rd Party Devices by Cadre · · Score: 1
    I won't even mention synching with my DVR since Jobs won't support any device that isn't an Apple device.

    Not true. Apple's iTunes supports many MP3 players other than the iPod.

    Another example of Apple supporting non Apple devices is iSync, which supports a multitude of phones that aren't Apple devices.

    --
    All editorial writers ever do is come down from the hill after the battle is over and shoot the wounded.
  267. Remotes should be IR. by Cadre · · Score: 1
    Can it be IR? Really? Apple using outdated tech... what's next, the Vinyl iPod. OK, IR uses very little battery-power. That's the only plus I can see. Bluetooth is the industry standard and all new macs have it.

    You can only have one active BlueTooth connection (people with BlueTooth keyboards or other utilities would have to disconnect everytime you wanted to just use the remote). It takes time to start/disconnect BlueTooth connections and you wouldn't really want to leave it connected all the time as it would suck the batteries dry (as you pointed out - infrared uses much less power). That and if you had multiple iMacs in your household they're be the whole thing of making sure the remote had connected to the iMac that you were currently sitting in front of.

    Infrared is the correct solution for a remote control. Just point it at the Mac you want to control. Infrared also gives you the option of ditching Apple's control and using your standard Universal remote to control the iMac (and the zillion other things in your house that are already controlled via infrared )...

    --
    All editorial writers ever do is come down from the hill after the battle is over and shoot the wounded.
  268. Killer App by Iron+Chef+Unix · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think that the killer app for the new iTunes/iPod is old TV shows. Have you ever wanted to watch an old TV show that isn't on DVD and isn't carried in reruns? There are plenty of shows that have followings, but aren't worth it for the networks to play. So, hire a team to go through your archives and digitize old TV shows and put them on iTunes. Instant revenue off of an already existing product. The hang-ups of course are paying to digitize them and figuring out how to pay all of the residuals to the actors.

    I don't think the cost would be overly excessive, considering that it is a one-time cost. And I'm guessing they have ways of figuring out residuals from their experience putting old shows on DVD.

    Just my 2 cents, but I would be willing to pay $2 for an episode or two of some old shows to watch. Plus, I could take them on the plane with my new video capable iPod.

    --
    Like puzzle games? Warehouse51 for iOS
  269. Convert DVD's to The iPod by databyss · · Score: 1

    To sort of counter my own point there, here is a process by which you can convert your DVD's to be used on The iPod.

    http://diveintomark.org/howto/ipod-dvd-ripping-gui de/

    The program used has downloads for OSX, Source, Debian and BeOS

    --
    Hmmm witty sig or funny sig? Maybe elitest techy sig!
  270. Re:Finally... Just downloaded Lost... some info.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no, it's fecking brilliant! cause this means that the televesion network is not losing money and wont lose the DVD buyers. one of the biggest concerns for the big companies is loosing/cannibalizing on their DVD sales... and when you see the 1.99 price tag you certainly think "oh that's nothing!" so the consumer is happy cause it looks cheap for just the odd episode and the company is happy cause it still sells DVDs, as the DVDs offer more for just a few dollars more... the only problem i would see to this is that there are shows out there with very few episodes. like Extras and six feet under which don't have the 20+ episodes of a normal tv series and therefore wont make as much money... not to mention that HBO sells their series DVD box sets for an arm and a leg. so probably this gig aint for them... specially if Apple wants to keep their one price tag model. but for normal series it looks good, even if at the end jelousy and pride will make the companies turn it down anyway no matter how good it becomes.

    i think this is a brilliant attempt! and very much hope that it expands into a new avenue of media distribution.

  271. What non-DRM formats are supported? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can we play the avi files from digital cameras or camcorders - personal home movies etc.? Will this device allow these non-DRM files? Will converting .avi to .mov work? What is the video equivalent of the mp3 format?

  272. No HDTV, No HDMI - They won't sell a single one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What? You Call THAT a Video iPod?

    Why it's missing HDTV, an HDMI connector, and Tivo/Cable/Dish Network recording functionality.

    Where is the AM/FM/XM/SW/HDTV/Subspace integrated tuner/receivers?

    It's got no microphone/universal remote/20megapixel camera/medical tricorder!?!

    Where's the innovation?

    Where's my 1080p 2.5" display?

    Maybe Apple can team up with RadioShack and add a little functionality to this 'iPod' thing. RadioShack has always had success with electronics, just look at the Tandy TSR line of products.

    Video iPod, Bah!

      Just a fad, no one will buy into this gizmo.

  273. Re:Finally... there *are* TV shows available by iluvcapra · · Score: 2, Interesting
    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
  274. Re:Finally... there *are* TV shows available by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

    I actually meant burning the stuff you buy on iTMS to a DVD - but that's useful, too. :)

    --
    Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
  275. Re:Finally... there *are* TV shows available by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

    Hmm.. Offer new series for $1.99, maybe sell a couple of thousand copies before it's saturated on bittorrent and nobody wants it any more.

    Or get US network to by it for $1 million.

    I know which I'd go for. If you want to complain complain to the US TV companies that are two shortsighted to buy a programme that's actually good.

  276. So which one of you geeks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is going to hack this baby to play XVID/DIVX/MPEG-1/2? Then this would be a MUST buy! For now I'm going with Nano.

  277. Re:Finally... Just downloaded Lost... some info.. by el_womble · · Score: 1

    I don't think this point can be emphasised enough. It takes HOURS to rip DVD to H.264 - HOURS. Its not like a CD where you can rip it before the first song is finished, it takes a fast computer, a signigificant fraction of a day at 100% CPU usage to get what Apple are providing for $2. Thats good value. My only critism is that for $2 an hour I'd expect HD quality not TV. I've got a 20" widescreen iMac that can play back 1024i movies in realtime and there is no content. None. I would gladly hand over $2 an epidsode for Lost / Firefly / House / Smallville (don't think too little of me) if I could watch them in fullscreen with low artifacts and pixalisation $2 and bandwidth is worth it.

    The next thing that needs to happen... Sony PSP gets into bed with iTMS. Apple must understand that they're different markets. People don't compare iPods and PSPs. They buy iPods if they want to listen to music in the gym/car they buy a PSP if they want to play games on the train / playground. There is function overlap, but not enough that they could be concidered the same thing - they are not. What isn't fair is that if someone with a PSP can't use it to play video they bought for their PC/Mac/iPod. Its not good for consumers (its also why I don't understand why anyone would ever buy a UMD).

    --
    Scared of flying, pointy things snce 1979!
  278. Video iPod for Cars by digitalpad · · Score: 1

    C'mon now -- just when they are cracking down on cell phone users in cars!! I doubt if they'd ever release a video iPod for cars. Peace!

  279. Re:Finally... there *are* TV shows available by geoffspear · · Score: 1
    Hey, NBC was smart enough to buy "Coupling".

    Of course, they turned it into absolute crap and quickly cancelled it. But they were halfway there.

    I can't comment on how they're doing with "The Office"; I haven't watched any of it and I don't plan to. I don't think they deserve another chance to prove to me they're not completely incompetent.

    --
    Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
  280. Re:Finally... Just downloaded Lost... some info.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    don't think too little of me
    We couldn't.
  281. Re:Finally... Just downloaded Lost... some info.. by valmont · · Score: 1

    don't feel too bad about smallville. Kristin Kreuk is like crack to me. they need to come-up with a TV show where all she does is just stare at the camera for one hour. that'd also make me happy.

  282. STFU CYRIC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck off Cyric! Please try to refrain from living.