Slashdot Mirror


Star Wars Sickout

Brahmastra writes "The New York Post reports that it will cost employers $628,880,000 in lost productivity on the first two days of Star Wars Episode III - Return of the Sith . How many of you are planning to skip at least part of your workday on the first two days?"

715 comments

  1. Fine... by MoxCamel · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...so I guess I'll pick up your slack AGAIN!

    1. Re:Fine... by Iron+Clad+Burrito · · Score: 1

      "I work hard because millions on government assistance are sitting in line to get star wars tickets and depending on me."

    2. Re:Fine... by Seumas · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Most single people are used to picking up the slack of parents in the office, anyway. This time, it just gives the other people a chance to cut out for a day and make the family people who are always taking days off or leaving early (without counting it as a vacation or sick day) to cover them.

      Except people like me, of course, who wouldn't see star wars if my company paid me to take the day off and watch it.

    3. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      slack?

      Is that slang for:
      3========================D

    4. Re:Fine... by turtled · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...reports that it will cost employers $628,880,000 in lost productivity on the first two days...

      Or, as I read it, "George Lucas will be $628,880,000 richer in the first two days..."

      --
      "I cannot think of any need in childhood as strong as the need for a father's protection." -- Sigmund Freud
    5. Re:Fine... by pr0f3550r · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I wonder if the Post has done any research as to how much worker productivity is lost by people reading their publication while at work? From their article they admit that they are making ASSumptions. I, for one, will be attending during the opening day. I think my employer will forgive me since I put in about 60-70 hours a week.

      Most people who are salaried are usually already putting in more than 40 a week. Anyone who is on the clock won't have to be paid during the time they are not at work (unless they are dishonest, in which case they are already probably screwing their employer). And losers on government subsidies already in line outside the theatres will finally be able to get back to playing Star Wars Stratego at home instead of in the rain!

      Overall I think it is better for the economy than worse.

    6. Re:Fine... by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Dude - I wish I had mod points right now.

      Picking up slack for the office broad that has a "cough cough" sick kid racks up hours. Over the course of a year - in addition to her two weeks of vacation time, and the 5 sick days and a personal day, she racked up close to 130 hours of "Oh I gotta leave" time.

      That's not counting her smoker time outside - which she managed to do at least ten minutes out of each hour.

      --
      _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    7. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I remember one job in particular where I was repeatedly asked to work overtime because I did not have a family. I was part of a team, and the supervisor and the team repeatedly made the point to me that I did not have a family, so I had more free time, and because of that, I was expected to take more overtime (and it was a salaried job, so I did not get paid OT).

    8. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I downloaded Sith during off hours using my neighbor's 802.11g connection. Just trying to keep America great, ya know.

    9. Re:Fine... by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Tsk. Tsk. Just cause you can't get any doesn't mean you should take it out on the rest of us who can.

      BTW, even if you single, childless folk are really as productive as you say, if everyone chose your "super productive" lifestyle, it would only last 30-40 years till everyone was too old to work... and no young 'uns to replace you.

      My observation is that the less respnsibilities in life someone has, the less efficient they really are with their time. There are exceptions. However, often when meeting up with some single friends, I find they are always late, and I am always on time despitehaving to pack up two kids under the age of two.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    10. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Been single.

      Been married.

      Been divorced for over a decade.

      From what I, and many of my friends have said, if you're married, you're likely getting less than the rest of us.

    11. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Picking up slack is my middle name. You all go see the movie. I'll be at work answering stupid emails.

    12. Re:Fine... by bob+whoops · · Score: 0

      No he won't. The number $628,880,000 comes from the fact that the estimated average amount of money made in one day by these people going to see the movie instead of work is ~$130. They are certainly not paying that much money to see the movie, let alone to George Lucas.

    13. Re:Fine... by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1, Interesting

      And us parents are used to picking up the slack of single people who call in sick with the "brown-bottle flu".

      All you singles want to do is stay out late drinking, having sex, and smoking pot. You don't want to work at all. Even when you're in the office, you don't do even half the work of a married person, because the drive to keep your job to feed your kid just isn't there.

      That's the other side of the coin.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    14. Re:Fine... by Xugumad · · Score: 5, Insightful

      *looks at parent* *looks at your message* *looks at parent*

      Huh? As far as I can tell you've read a little too far between the lines. Your message's parent seemed to just be complaining that they were expected to put in more time to make up for people with families.

      In particular, I see no reason for you to complain about being expected to work as many hours as the single people do. If your job demands more hours than you can provide, get a job that doesn't, don't expect others to pick up the slack because you feel we have more time available than you.

      Admittadely, flexibility may be an issue; if something needs rushed to completion, or you genuinely need to be away from work to look after a sick kid, I don't mind throwing in some extra time, but I expect for you to put in extra hours later to make up for it, and let me take it easy for a bit.

      On a related note; for those of us who are single, particularly long term single, free time for our social lives is key to changing that. Or would you prefer we stay single so we can continue to spend more time at work so you can keep a job that expects more hours than you have available?

    15. Re:Fine... by putaro · · Score: 1

      Single /.'ers are probably the only ones getting less than us married folks.

    16. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, I used to work with smokers...15-20 minutes they would spend out of each hour out back lighting up, while I was expected to keep working away with my head down. When it came time to "right-size" the organization, I and another non-smoker got the axe. Noooooo...I'm not bitter...

    17. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I too hate those people who care about their families more than they care about a stupid fucking job.

    18. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All you singles want to do is stay out late drinking, having sex, and smoking pot.

      And the problem with that?

      Oh, I see. Just a bit jealous, are we? Remembering the good days when that was what your life was like?

    19. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      hahaha not a chance. really - i'm getting more since getting married than I ever did as a singleton. i've been married 9 years, got 1 kid, and things just get better.

      no wonder you're divorced.

    20. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yes, we want to drink, have sex and smoke pot. That's the drive that keeps us working...
      You're just bitter cuz you didn't use a condom and now you can't drink anymore, can't smoke pot anymore, and most definitely ain't gettin' any sex anymore (sex after kids? don't make me laugh).

    21. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most single people are used to picking up the slack of parents in the office, anyway.

      Of the 15 people in our team, it's the three single guys who are having most absense. They're usually extending their weekends (probably having problems with hangovers) by calling in sick on Mondays.

      Btw... who's going to make the money to pay for your pension? Their kids...

    22. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeh....and that is why the two single, mid-twenty guys on our team work less than 8 hours a day.

      Hell...my last day is on Friday and I beat both of them into work and leave after them.

      More efficient at surfing slashdot perhaps, but not more efficient or productive in the work place.

    23. Re:Fine... by nb+caffeine · · Score: 1

      seconded. And agree with the gp. however, i make my time back as a smoker :)

      --

      "Something's wrong with you...and I hope we never do meet again." - Deftones When Girls Telephone Boys
    24. Re:Fine... by timeOday · · Score: 1
      Most single people are used to picking up the slack of parents in the office, anyway.
      Perhaps people with families do skip more work, but it's not as if it doesn't harm their careers. Anybody with priorities higher than work is going to miss more work, and be somewhat stifled in their career. If you wanted, you could put something above your work, too.

      In any case, if there's an inequity you should blame your boss, not your co-workers.

    25. Re:Fine... by burnunit0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This may be your experience, but it isn't applicable universally. At our company we strive not to place undue assumptions/expectations on either non-parents or parents. When I go early to deal with an unforeseen childcare issue or take my daughter to the doctor, I'm expected to fill out a PTO form. When my single, child-free coworker leaves early to play golf he has to do the same. (The golf scenario is increasingly common as the weather gets warm--none of your child-free employees has ever made more work for the others?).

      I can appreciate your annoyance if your company doesn't use PTO and instead has that whole "sick time"/"vacation" thing working to foment suspicion between coworkers (it inevitably does). But I'm not sure you picked the right way to vent that spleen of yours-- are you mad at George Lucas or all of us irresponsible breeders? both? your company? neither? what, exactly?

      --
      yes. that's all I'm going to say in all comments from now on.
    26. Re:Fine... by turtled · · Score: 1

      I understand what that number represents. Apparently, you have no sense of humor.

      --
      "I cannot think of any need in childhood as strong as the need for a father's protection." -- Sigmund Freud
    27. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow!

      So you were a virgin when you married? I didn't know anybody waited that long anymore.

    28. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually.... I am planning on skipping out.... but then again my employer gave me free tickets to an advance screening on work time... hmmmm... why did I like this job again.... :)

    29. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are working more than 40 hours per week and you aren't planning on retiring early, you should reconsider.

    30. Re:Fine... by JPriest · · Score: 2, Funny

      What makes you think all star wars fans are single you insensitive clod? I am single but what if that were not the case?

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    31. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Only on Slashdot do the conservative, boring parents go by names like "Profane MuthaFucka".

    32. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, its productivity that counts, not the hours on the job (unless of course you're getting paid by the hour, in which case productivity drops and your hours go up).
      I earn a salary. I have my slow days, and I have my explosive days.
      Overall, I get more stuff done in a shorter amount of time than others, because I'm very good at what I do, and I do it better than most. That's what allows me to leave an hour earlier when I need to. Nobody picks up the slack, because there is none to be picked.

      If you're coming in sooner, and leaving later, that would indicate your productivity is lower than theirs. Ever think that maybe they work less than 8 hours a day because they're just more efficient than you are?

      Just wondering...

    33. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry...were all sure profane_muthfucka is a great parent.

    34. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
      All you singles want to do is stay out late drinking, having sex, and smoking pot.

      Want to, yes, but we are Slashdot singles.

    35. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All you singles want to do is stay out late drinking, having sex, and smoking pot. You don't want to work at all.

      Well considering I am single guy who is also a bit of a workaholic (I work 40+ hrs a week of work with no slacking and then code/research/study at home to improve my skills) who also has sex quite often (just did 2 hours ago) and smokes pot and plays in a band and has the occasional night of drinking on the weekend (though that is a bit rare lately), I see that generalization a bit off.

      However, I have respect for those who are married with children and still manage to work their asses off. I don't know how they do it. I have enough trouble balancing all my activities that I don't know how they can manage theirs. I guess it comes down to sleeping less and doing more, that is what I'm finding. I've cut from 8 to 6 hrs of sleep and seem to function fine.

      So either way, I don't care much for people who slack off at work, but fortunately I don't have to deal with that much. Just a bit of incompetence here and there, which I find much worse.

    36. Re:Fine... by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'll have to disagree with you on this. I'm single, I rarely stay out late or have that much sex (at least not to the point where it impacts my job), and I don't smoke pot at all. I'm also 22, and work twice as many hours a week then the other gentlemen I work with, who are twice my age and have childeren. Parents picking up the slack indeed. Call me when you're done working 80 hour weeks for 3 years and we'll talk. P.S. My drive to make money is because I want to be wealthy, not because of some inate need to want to have to support dependents.

    37. Re:Fine... by Jim_Callahan · · Score: 1

      The 'interesting' tag on your post indicates that your sense of humor is too complex for these unenlightened surroundings. Unless you were being serious, in which case you're a complete nutcase.

      --
      ...it's really a sad day for America when we require a goddamn ACT OF CONGRESS to make our DVD players work properly. ~
    38. Re:Fine... by DissidentHere · · Score: 3, Insightful

      He he - that is some funny shit. It is amazing how all the 'normals' who want to have kids and do the suburban thing seem to think that the rest of us are 'rolling in the dough' and on 'easy street.' Did you ever wonder why there are more animal rights organizations than human population control causes? I have great respect for the 'family man' (woman) and ask my employees to put their family first (even at the risk of losing a customer) because nothing is more important. But just because I'm single doesn't mean I have no motivation, no drive and no incentive. Without a job I would have just as much trouble paying the mortgage and would not be able to the (different) things important to me (s.a. travel, philanthropy). That said - as the 'single guy' I volunteer for the travel and off hours so my coworkers who do have kids etc can have the 'usual' off time, sick kid care, daycare hours, etc. So there's the overt response to the (hopefully) sarcastic post.

      --
      "None of us are as dumb as all of us." - meeting mantra
    39. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And us parents are used to picking up the slack of single people who call in sick with the "brown-bottle flu".

      Aww, you have to work harder on Mondays sometimes? What about the *three months* that I spend working overtime because some filthy breeder bitch decided it was time to spew forth yet more of her disgusting spawn? What about the weekly or biweekly doctor's appointments for the other nine months of the year? And what about every time your larva gets ill, needs to go to the dentist, needs a babysitter, can't get to soccer practice, or what the fuck ever?

      You married people don't want to work at all, either. You just think that having some snot-faced filthy brat to feed gives you the moral high ground when all your work lands in my in-box. Just because my mistakes aren't going to be calling me "Daddy" for the rest of my life doesn't make yours any more noble.

    40. Re:Fine... by Seumas · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not even sure if I am supposed to take your response seriously, since you claim to be a parent, but have stileproject.com as your homepage... However:

      The difference is that parents are able to use their kids or family as an acceptable excuse whenever they like. There is no stigma in doing that.

      "I have to leave two hours early every Friday to take my kids to practice", is acceptable.

      "I have to come in late today becuase my child has a doctor appointment", is acceptable.

      "I'm not coming in today, because my child has the day off from school", is acceptable.

      And it really builds up. Who knows if it's always legitimate or not, but using "children" or "family" as an excuse is rarely frowned upon.

      But if someone who has other obligations needed time off, they would not recieve the same treatment. Of course, parents talk about how hard being a parent is and try to get sympathy however they can, but the fact is, you're hired to do a job. The same job I am. That you decided to have kids and a family is not my responsibility or my problem. But when you take excessive time off over the year and the rest of the office must cover for you, it is my problem.

      If only sick days and vacation days were used, I'd have no problem with it. But I do have a problem that these excuses are often used to take time off that is not subtracted from those sources. They're taken in addition to, because the company can't look bad by being "anti-family".

      I also like how you try to make it sound like you bust your ass and it's the single people that slack off. See, we work hard, because we have to cover our own work and yours. And our drive is enjoying our money. Spending it how we like. We don't have this sense of self-entitlement to our salary, our job, our time off, our "off the books" time off or anything else.

      Parents don't even do half the work of a single person, because they spend the whole day on the phone talking to their kids or their spouse or someone else about problems they're having with their kids or their spouse. And then, of course, they start babbling to coworkers about their family life or their kids or their spouse. The amount of time lost to parents chronically avoiding their duties because of "family" is riduclous.

      And no, that doesn't apply to every parent. There are many parents who make work a priority and don't ditch the other people in the office with work because they had to go meet the principal during work time. But there are a lot who do. Enough that it has become a stereotype.

      As you see from the responses to this thread, the number of people who feel similar is not small. And we aren't against you taking time off from work for family. Just when you do it in addition to the vacation and sick time you already have. You should only be able to use sick time and vacation time. Just like it's all the rest of us have.

    41. Re:Fine... by ruiner13 · · Score: 1
      "All you singles want to do is stay out late drinking, having sex, and smoking pot. You don't want to work at all. Even when you're in the office, you don't do even half the work of a married person, because the drive to keep your job to feed your kid just isn't there."

      Or perhaps there is something at home that you married people don't want to go back to. The happily married people I know are just as eager to get home as single people.

      --

      today is spelling optional day.

    42. Re:Fine... by Seumas · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No kidding!

      I seriously hate that. If your smoking impedes your work that much, maybe it's a sign that you should quit. Imagine if I took five minutes out of every hour to go out to the lobby and masturbate?

      I think smokers should be put in a seperate part of the building with modified circulation systems that don't affect the rest of the building. No more smoke-break excuses. You want to smoke two packs a day during work? Great. But do it at your desk, hunkered over your work.

    43. Re:Fine... by Afrosheen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well most smokers would probably prefer that to being herded outside despite any weather conditions. Smokers are marginalized and ostracized enough as it is, no need to cry about working while they're smoking. At least they're smart enough to realize they need a break from time to time, you should try walking around for no apparent reason from time to time. ;)

    44. Re:Fine... by Seumas · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I'm really tired of parents who justify their behaviors by saying "but I'm doing society a favor by continuing the human race!".

      Drop the bullshit. You are not more productive or dedicated or intelligent or valuable, just because you couldn't keep your legs together or you were too lazy to slip on a condom. You never sat down and thought to yourself "I think I'm going to impregnant someone this week and do the world a favor, because I'm such a wonderful and altruistic human being".

      You know god damn well that you just knocked it out one night and the condom broke or you were in too much of a hurry to bother with protection or your girlfriend lied about being on the pill and you wound up with an "accident". And now you're stuck dealing with it and try to cover for it by assuring yourself that you're somehow a saint for being a parent. That you now have some greater purpose and that everyone who isn't a parent is somehow a parasite.

      My observation is that the less responsible and more impulsive someone is in life, the more likely they are to have children. And if they are irrespoonsible and impulsive in their personal life, they'll probably be that way at work.

      And the reason your "single friends" are probably always late when they come to meet you is because they were procrastinating; dreading having to hang out with you AND your two annoying bastards.

    45. Re:Fine... by Seumas · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When you're the single person in the office, you don't have as much free time and social life as the married people think you do. Why not? Well, because it's the single person who is usually pushed into the odd houred slots (weekends, overnight, long hours, rushed deadlines) - not to mention they're usually the first chosen to have to travel on business and work holidays.

      I don't care what someone's excuses are for not being able to do their job or not being able to put in the extra effort that someone else has to. If it's because you have children - that's your problem. It is NOT my problem. If you have a drug or drinking problem, it's your problem, too. NOT mine. No matter what your situation is, it is simply not anyone else's problem. You can either do the work and put in the hours or you can not. It's that simple.

      I don't want to hear parents throw around excuses, as if being a parent excuses everything, anymore than I want to hear some crackhead making excuses. Both lead to someone else making up for their slack and both are unacceptable.

      Next thing you know, married people are going to demand higher salaries than single people, because it's not fair that single people can spend their money on something other than two or three four year old "accidents" and their braces or schoolbooks.

    46. Re:Fine... by Seumas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem is that while everyoen tends to get the same amount of sick/vacation/PTO days in any given company, I think it is quite common for parents to come in late, leave early, take time out of the middle of the day or not come in at all and not have it subtracted from their alotted accured vacation/sick/PTO days.

      And that is where a lot of single people get frustrated. If you have 20 days from various accruals to use in a year for whatever purpose you wish and you use them to take care of your children and household problems, that's great. If you choose to use them to go on vacation, great. If you choose not to use them at all, that's great.

      But if you use them to go on vacation and then you take additional time off throughout the year for family situations and you aren't forced to account for it, it is quite unfair to everyone else.

      StarWars people would piss me off if they didn't count the day off. And that was the contrast I was originally drawing. Imagine if the StarWars people took the day off, but they didn't have to count it as a sick day, vacation day or any other kind of accrued day? What if it was just not counted and they were paid for it, just like Jane Doe gets paid for the time she takes off to attend to her family?

    47. Re:Fine... by cbreaker · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Such a fine post wasted in reply to that tard. I agree with you completely.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    48. Re:Fine... by zerocool^ · · Score: 1


      Admittadely, flexibility may be an issue; if something needs rushed to completion, or you genuinely need to be away from work to look after a sick kid, I don't mind throwing in some extra time, but I expect for you to put in extra hours later to make up for it, and let me take it easy for a bit.


      This is the issue with parenting and working. Sometimes there are two absolutes that have to be in opposition. For example, if you're going out with friends, and all of a sudden a crisis happens, you can call and cancel/reschedule. However, if I'm at work, and something goes down at 5PM, no matter *what* happens, I have to leave at 6:30 in order to pick my one-year-old up from daycare by 7:00pm. I might be able to push it to 6:35, but I think they start charging me $15 per minute past 7pm.

      ~will

      --
      sig?
    49. Re:Fine... by Ecks · · Score: 1

      Well, as a parent who was childless up to two point seven years ago, I can tell you that the loss of productivity for having a child is real. However, the childless, myself from two point seven years ago include, tend to overestimate the value of this.

      Go back to sleep Jay

      -- Ecks

    50. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the original post: "Star Wars Episode III - Return of the Sith." Shouldn't it be "Star Wars Episode III - Revenge of the Sith?"

      The companies can send the 'lost productivity' bill to old George Lucas himself.

    51. Re:Fine... by Hubertus_BigenD · · Score: 1

      yea i uhh...need to take my Gameboy break now.

    52. Re:Fine... by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      I take 'fresh air breaks'. Not once an hour, but I do try to take several fresh air breaks a day and go for a walk around the block.

      This is especially helpful if I'm stuck in solving a problem. Clear my head, and I'll often fix it when I'm outside.

      If anyone dare complains, I point out the smokers and they usually shut up.

    53. Re:Fine... by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yes, I am a parent. Profane Muthafucka is a "stage name" and I've created a whole nasty personae around it. My other account id is 10000, but not as low as yours. :-)

      I think the main problem with your original post, and also with my response, is that they are generalizations based on stereotypes.

      examples: "Never trust anyone over 30" vs. "You couldn't understand because you're too young."

      All I know is that since I became a parent, I work much harder at my job, and I haven't taken a sick day in the 17 months my little daughter has been with us. Painting parents as slackers is as unfair as my painting singles as slacking pot-smoking sex fiends.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    54. Re:Fine... by khoury.brazil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree. If anything I bust my ass harder to make sure that my kids have food. I make sure I get my shit done so I don't lose my job. I may be an exception but I won't be knocked on for others actions.

    55. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You seem to misunderstand the words "not MY problem" *You* have the obligation to the job, *you* have the obligation to the rugrat. Nobody else's fault but your own

    56. Re:Fine... by itomato · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "At least they're smart enough to realize they need a break from time to time"

      Huh?! They are not in control, buddy, the ciggies are.

      They are heading out like clockwork because they are *ADDICTED*.

      The monkey says, "Light up! NOW!!"

      I got tired of losing out on "smoke breaks", so I started taking my own breaks when I needed them - at 30 to 50 minutes per pop. Just hop up and vaporize.

      Where's Juddy? Smoke break - carton at a time...

    57. Re:Fine... by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      Addiction is so tricky isn't it? I'm addicted to food, so I eat 3 times a day, like clockwork. ;)

    58. Re:Fine... by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      You know, most of those slacker parents were slackers when they were single, too. Some of us have kids and still put in all-nighters when necessary.

      Of course, that's because I'm stupid and apparently like being taken advantage of by my company, but that's nothing to do with my being a parent or not.

      Chances are that there are singles in your office who are as bad as the slacker parents, and parents who are as good as the conscientious singles. You just don't notice them, especially the hard-working parents, as there's nothing remarkable about them.

    59. Re:Fine... by wgaryhas · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you but most married peoples' kids that I know of were not 'accidents'. Granted my sample population is limited mostly to relatives and good friends. (I guess I just don't hang around with the type of people that would accidentally have a kid)

      --
      "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." - H.L. Mencken
    60. Re:Fine... by Tim+C · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Then your supervisor and team were twats, and you should have refused (and I say that as a parent).

      Your time is your own, what you choose to do with it is nobody's business but yours. I can understand going easy on people with obvious outside commitments (such as a family, sick relative, evening course, etc), but not being harder on you just because you had free time.

      What you were being told was effectively "you have no-one to complain when you work late, so we own you". Fuck that.

    61. Re:Fine... by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      That's true, but as a computer operator (assuming here, it is /. after all) you're supposed to take regular breaks. UK Health and Safety guidelines recommend something like 10 minutes in every hour - you're supposed to do something else, focus on a distant point for a minute or two to relax your eyes, move about a bit, that sort of thing.

      No, nobody I know does it either, but you're *supposed* to. At least the smokers get that; I do agree about the time wasted though. It amuses me that singles complain about parents taking an extra half an hour or so once or twice a week (if it's that frequent, even) yet ignore the smokers taking 10 minutes or so every hour or two, every single day.

    62. Re:Fine... by Tim+C · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know about the US, but here in the UK people are legally entitled to take time off work for exceptional circumstances. That includes, for example, caring for a dependent (eg child, sick relative) or partner, attending funerals, etc. There's no limit on the amount of time, other than that it should be "reasonable" and needs to be agreed with the employer. There's also no requirement that the time be paid, that's up to the employer and employee to agree between themselves.

      Parents will inevitably need to take care of their kid(s) from time to time, that's just the way it is. It only becomes a problem if they start taking the piss. If that happens, it's probably not because they're parents, it's probably because they're using their kids as a convenient excuse to grab some more time off. In that case, they should be dealt with as would any other AWOL employee.

    63. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I don't know about where you work (somewhere in the UK?), but here in the state of California in an 8 hour day employers are required to give you 2 paid 10 minute breaks and an unpaid 30 minute lunch break.

      Typically only smokers actually take them. However if you don't take them, you have nothing to complain about.

    64. Re:Fine... by Diag · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I often have a couple of non-smokers join me for a stroll when I go out for a cig. I have a 10 minute break every 90 minutes or so, but I usually skip the lunch break and eat at my desk.

      Also, I find I still get a lot of work done on smoke breaks. My job is generally involves fixing operational problems that require some thinkin', and I couldn't count how many times I've come up with the "That's it!!!" solution while sitting outside having a quiet smoke.

      --
      Serving Suggestion: Defrost
    65. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, I know it's hard to fathom this, but just because you were an accident, doesn't mean that plenty of people don't have kids intentionally and responsibly.

    66. Re:Fine... by Diag · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I sympathise. I've felt exaclty the same way about co-worker parents in the past. It can be very frustrating.

      However, I see it as an overhead of modern western society. Nowadays both parents have to work to maintain a reasonable standard of living for their kids. This was very rare for my parent's generation, but now it's the norm.

      It means we all have to be a bit more flexible with each other these days.

      And you can't really say "It was their decision to have kids." If nobody made that decision, we wouldn't get far as a species.

      --
      Serving Suggestion: Defrost
    67. Re:Fine... by Gumph · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow, you managed to deduce all that from one single post on /.?
      you must be the new sherlock Holmes, can you tell me who killed Lord Lucan????

      --
      'By the pricking of my thumbs, something wicked this way comes'
    68. Re:Fine... by daikokatana · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A company I worked with had a very simple solution to deal with smokers. If you smoke (no matter how much or how frequently) you either:
      - work 25% longer than the non-smokers
      - get paid 25% less than the non-smokers
      - quit smoking
      Simple as that.
      At the moment I'm in a whole different situation: my boss smokes, so he doesn't care about non-smokers. Here the policy is reversed: if you want to breathe clean air for a while, go outside. Fortunately I spent 99% of my time for the past years at client sites, so this does not affect me that much.

      --
      http://jcsnippets.atspace.com/ - a collection of Java & C# snippets
    69. Re:Fine... by bariswheel · · Score: 1

      I do agree strongly with you on some level. Married people are usually (not all of course) needy dependent people having to project that feeling onto someone else, and they make single people feel bad and out of touch with society. Because of this there are TONS of parents who hate their lives (they will never admit it of course, otherwise their kids will kill them) and in turn become terrible parents, and the cycle goes on and on. It's disgusting. If you're going to be a parent and have kids, fine, you better do a good fucking job. Otherwise mind your own fucking business and leave the single people alone.

      --
      Insinct is stronger than Upbringing - Irish Proverb
    70. Re:Fine... by MattyCobb · · Score: 1

      I think you would find most smokers would gladly trade outside time for the ability to smoke inside the office while working...

      --

      Matt
      You have 1 Moderator Point! Use it or lose it! Is that a threat? -vapid
    71. Re:Fine... by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      Depends, I'm single /.er and getting plenty ;)

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    72. Re:Fine... by jacksonj04 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In my peer group (16-18 year olds, mostly from a council estate) then a lot of them are pregnant, and most certainly not planned. Even more scary is the number already pushing prams and still trying to attend 6th Form (College).

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    73. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've yet to see a Star Wars movie in a theater/cinema...it'll be on television in a few years anyway...

    74. Re:Fine... by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      It means we all have to be a bit more flexible with each other these days.

      He wasn't attacking flexibility in the work schedule, but taking time off from work and not counting it against vacation and/or sick leave. When you do that you foist your work off on your fellow employees - that work just doesn't disappear into the ether. If you fail to count it against vacation/sick hours then you end up getting the same amount of hours as everyone else in the office AND additional, paid hours that single folks and parents with an actual work ethic don't.

      He's right in asserting that being a parent doesn't entitle one to extra paid hours off. Breeding doesn't come with an additional set of perks, as it isn't a particularly special accomplishment (barring medical difficulties, anyone can do it).

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    75. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The solution to your problem is quite simple. Just get an "abortion" (it's never too late) and a divorce, and you can lose the long work weeks, the lack of sex, the inability to smoke pot and stay out drinking, and the bitter, jaded attitude.

    76. Re:Fine... by ZMech13 · · Score: 1

      This is what vacation days are for. I had mine scheduled and locked in back in December. I did the same thing for Ep II and all three Lord of the Rings Movies. Plan ahead, it's not that hard to do.

    77. Re:Fine... by FLOOBYDUST · · Score: 1
      ROTFL.....

      1st Flamebait response..... Dude..just cuz you can't hook up with anyone don't blame it on us....

      1st Troll response...... I'm with you man....we lose more productivity due to soccer mom's in our office...

      1st informative response...... What's with \. This was discussed on HACK-A-DAY last week

      1st Ask Slashdot OT response..... I had to evacuate my office yesterday due to some plane flying overhead in some airspace....how would the \. readers track that on their timesheet? Is their one for Star Wars movies too?

    78. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      When I was young/single/just starting out, I faced the same situation. I put up with that for about three months, then stopped and stood my ground.
      There was some discomfort, but no real problem.

      The key issue was that I got my work done. That is still the key issue.

      Some years later, married and with a one year old child, I put in about seven months of 60 hour weeks straight through. Everybody was pounding in overtime, some a little more productively than others. I woke up every day at the crack of dawn so that I could get home to see my kid before she went to sleep. I caught flack for the fact that I didn't stay for the dinner that they brought in every night. (No thanks, I'll go home and eat with my wife, thank you). Yeah, an hour munching bad chinese take-out sure is productive, you losers.
      Unfortunately in that case, the cultural overtime was so bad I had to bail to a new job.
      When I was interviewing, I made it clear that I would only work 40 per week, but that I would get my work done. Out of five interviews, only one expressed concern that my time limit demands might be a problem. I told them thanks for the time and excused myself. Out of the other four, I got three offers. I have not worked more than 40 per week since then.

      Moral of the story. Determine your limits and stick by them. As long as you get your work down, you will be rewarded. If you encounter and entrenched culture of overtime, run for the nearest exit.

    79. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow... that was me at 22... when you realize what's important, you'll see the stupidity of your last statement.

      What's even more, I have children, and I still work a lot.

    80. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And *you* have the obligation to manage your own life. You don't like the hours *you* are putting in, then don't. They can't hold a gun to your head. They do not *own* you. If you are getting your work done, they won't fire you. Look around at the slackers that you work with. How many high hour losers do you see? Going through the motions but getting nothing done. Oh, if you are one of them, stop your bitching about other peoples time. I have a pile of responsibility. I have a lot of pressure to maintain my current income. I get my work done, on time, no complaining. No, I don't spend an extra five hours each week playing ping-pong to build team spirit. No, I don't take those 1.5 hour lunches with the clique. No, I don't hang out in the break room chatting nerdy news every afternoon for PM coffee. If you would cut all that crap out, you might find you are only working about 35 hours a week. So STFU....

    81. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You got canned because all the others are in a nice little clique. Smoking is a very social activity and by not joining them you're an outsider. When it's time to cut staff, you'd be the first all the smokers would recommend.

    82. Re:Fine... by notbob · · Score: 1

      Not our fault your woman didn't keep her legs crossed.

      I'm with most the rest of the single crowd here, if ur walking out I'm racing ya to the door cause I'll be damned if I'm picking up the slack for the same pay. Now if it's hourly and I'm going to make overtime for your snot nosed kid... well let me get the door for u ;)

      Mind you the $15/minute is a tad steep, maybe you should consider a non-nazi daycare center.

    83. Re:Fine... by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Well if you did it in the lobby, you would likely be fired or arrested for indecency.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    84. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My company *is* paying me to take off and watch it!

    85. Re:Fine... by stanmann · · Score: 1

      not the GP, but in todays world it really is smarter and safer, and there are other good reasons too.

      If you learn together and learn each other, it inevitably gets better. And yes, I've heard that variety is awesome, But Bill Engvall has a bit where he points out all the advantages of consistency in a relationship.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    86. Re:Fine... by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      My brother worked for a company that would pay you $100 if you quit smoking. I think that they figured they'd make up for in the extra productivity. Not to mention that they'd look good by to make it look like they were looking out for the health of their employees.

      In the end, I don't think that money on this small a scale would stop a lot of people from smoking. They save $10 a pack anyway (in Canada) and that's way more than $100 if you count it over a couple months, or a lifetime. Anyway, it's kind of a shame that people need monetary incentive to save their own lives.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    87. Re:Fine... by Ratbert42 · · Score: 1

      I guess we're on the cutting edge here. We just have a pile of Paid Time Off days and you use them for whatever. Sick days, Star Wars, etc. They're my days so nobody should care if I use them on a sick kid or a bad movie.

    88. Re:Fine... by Edax+Rarem · · Score: 1

      And how much time is taken off while posting on /.?
      For some of these folks, _that_ is a full time job. ;-]

      --
      I hate my sig.
    89. Re:Fine... by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Both parents don't have to work. That's all BS. There are cases where both parents have to work, but that is because they are both only make 20K a year.

      If you count the tax savings, daycare savings, only needing 1 car savings, not going out for dinner so often savings, piece of mind that your children are being raised the way you want them to savings, and then stop and think if you really need the $500K home, or the $30K car, the 5K entertainment system, the name brand food thats the same as the no name food, the no name clothes that are the same as the name brand clothes. I could go on even longer. When all this stuff adds up, then the other job doesn't really make you that much, unless both jobs are making 60K a year. In which case, both parents don't need to be working in the first place.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    90. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, where I work, if you need to leave early / have a long lunch break, whether it's to meet your child's teacher, have a new TV delivered or whatever, you do it, and make up the time later. If you need whole days off, you need to count them as sick or vacation.

      Sure, it's more often the parents who have sudden emergencies and need to leave, but it also tends to be parents who come in at 4am to get work done.

      In my experience, if you treat people like responsible adults, they'll behave like it. If you clock-watch, they'll start working to rule, or trying to bend the rules.

    91. Re:Fine... by mirio · · Score: 1

      Only on Slashdot do the conservative, boring parents go by names like "Profane MuthaFucka".

      Yeah, he's banging the mother of his children so the alias is valid.

    92. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The word is "chavscum" ...

    93. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "however, i make my time back as a smoker :)"

      Borrowed time, my friend.

    94. Re:Fine... by cdrudge · · Score: 1
      Anyway, it's kind of a shame that people need monetary incentive to save their own lives.
      Depending how you look at it, you aren't saving a life. You are just prolonging death.
    95. Re:Fine... by cdrudge · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe your experience is that way, but my (albeit limited) experience is the opposite. Many of my married w/ children coworkers routinely come in early, stay late, etc. Other single or just married w/o children are in the door at 7:30 and out the door at 4:00. Hourly/salary has some to do with this, but its also the type of people they are, but I usually see more salary people picking up the extra work then non-salary. Classifying all married w/ children workers as slackers is just incorrectly stereotyping us.

      It also helps to have a company that actually enforces sick/personal time. I get a lump of hours to use for being sick, doctors appointments for both me AND my family. If I need to stay home with a sick kid, I lose the hours. If I need to pick him up from school early, I lose the hours. If your company doesn't enforce it, then blame your company as well.

    96. Re:Fine... by eth1 · · Score: 1

      Actually, my experience has been that the parents tend to stay *later*. My last two jobs, my boss had kids, and he'd always find any possible excuse to stick around as late as possible. I guess so that he wouldn't have to deal with feeding them, etc? Dunno, but it was always annoying, because he'd come in at 4:30 with some project he was going to work on this evening and expect help, not realizing that some people have a life outside work.

    97. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the deal with mod points? I read about it constantly on here? I mean is there a sect of posters who get all geeky with concern about how a post is modded? Or is there some prize you get after you reach a certain amount of "points" or something? On the surface it just sounds incredibly bizzare that some many are concerned so gravely about how a post on an Internet is "rated" (modded) by others.

      Anyway...man you are one stupid person if you wouldn't take off to go see Star Wars and YOU WERE PAID by your boss to do so. Its better than working, and unless you are spied on, how would the company know you just didn't skip the movie and do your own thing on an "off" day?

      Btw, I agree though..I'm not really all that excited or concerned with seeing the movie. When I see it...I see it.

    98. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know god damn well that you just knocked it out one night and the condom broke or you were in too much of a hurry to bother with protection or your girlfriend lied about being on the pill and you wound up with an "accident".

      Not that you're bitter or anything, eh?

      You know, some people actually do spend years doing something known (outside slashdot) as 'trying for a baby'. And the really astonishing thing about this is that they actually mean it, and not just those insane females either... scary as it is, there are men who honestly seem to want to procreate, who even seem to plan it into their lives, how mad can you get?

      Yes, I know, I can't believe it either - I mean why would anybody want one? It's insane!

    99. Re:Fine... by skaternum · · Score: 1

      I'm both married AND childless, you insensitive clod.

      Seriously, there are more people in the office than the Married Schnook With Kids and the Single Partier types.

      And while I agree that society benefits in general when the collective "We" rear well-adjusted children, I'm pretty darned tired of all the parental crises in my office. I was responsible enough to use effective birth control, so why am I always having to adjust my life to suit your kids?

      Here's the part where I piss off most of my friends who are working mothers: children require TONS of time and attention on a regular basis. If you or your spouse/the other parent aren't prepared to put that time in without it affecting your job, don't have the kids --or stay home and actually rear them! What makes you think you can continue to put in the same amoung of time and effort into your job once you've acquired another "job" of attending to a child? It just doesn't work that well. Your kid winds up in daycare, assimilating the values of the high school dropout who's with him 10 hours a day. OR Your co-workers wind up picking up the slack for the job you're now only doing 80% of the time (at 100% of the pay). Make the financial sacrifice, and spend the time rearing your child. Drive a Honda instead of an Acura. Go the beach instead of Disneyworld. Send your kid to only 2 camps this summer instead of 6. (Horrors! What will the neighbors think.)

      I didn't intend for this to become such a rant. Sorry. Hot button!!

    100. Re:Fine... by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      If your trying to not prolong death, smoking is quite a bad attempt at not prolonging death. There are much cheaper and faster ways to make death come about.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    101. Re:Fine... by IdleTime · · Score: 1

      15-20 min? Seriously, that company have other issues than smokers to allow that.

      And the non-smokers don't take breaks? Gimme a break! I left my desk ones for a smoke, came back 5 minutes later and I still see the same 2 non-smokers standing in the corridor chatting about private issues. Take off your "hate smokers"-glasses for a moment and realize that the world is not black and white, it's full of colors. I don't think there is much difference in the amount of time wasted between smokers and non-smokers.

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    102. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our CTO is taking us all (all tech & product departments at the HQ - about 200 people) to eat breakfast, play trivia games, contests, see the movie, etc. the morning of the opening. Damn it feels good to be a monster.

    103. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Call me when you're done working 80 hour weeks for 3 years and we'll talk. P.S. My drive to make money is because I want to be wealthy

      Are you actually planning to take the time to enjoy the money you've earned? Sure, you could wait until retirement, but there's always the possibility that with your lifestyle you may not live that long.

      If it's just the pure accumulation of wealth that you crave, perhaps you should consider this? I'm sure it would be a healthier alternative to your current regime.

    104. Re:Fine... by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      That's it!!!" solution while sitting outside having a quiet smoke.

      Yea I can buy that. There have been plenty of times when I sat on the toilet and BANG - it hit me. I figured out the answer to my quandry. I always figured it was the cooler air from the toilet hitting my body and cooling me off (i do better in cooler weather). :)

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    105. Re:Fine... by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 1

      will cost employers $628,880,000 in lost productivity
      I wonder how they come up with these numbers.... I do know that yesterday it was sunny and nice here, and today it is cool and rainy- and yesterday there were a lot fewer people in the office...
      Here is my pet peeve- it is all these claims about what everything costs- there was an article in Reader's Digest (I know, I know... make fun...) a year or so ago about a guy, who totally unscientifically, wrote down for a year every time he saw one of these claims about money- things like traffic jams cost XXX million a year, headaches cost $XXX a year in lost productivity, the NCAA tourney costs $XXX million a year, PMS costs $XXX million a year, Hemmoroids cost $XXX billion a year in lost productivity and so on ad infinutum... the point is, just the examples he had found and added up, were something like 25 times the GDP of the US. So these monetary lost productivity claims are BS designed to make a headline impact in the newspapers. (I will say that I had a burrito yesterday for lunch, and the resulting gas caused several coworkers to leave their desks... so I must wonder what the dollar value of the lost productivity from my anal eruptions adds up to... luckily they were the silent and stinky variety, so I can't be blamed and subsequently billed...)

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    106. Re:Fine... by yakovlev · · Score: 1
      Admittadely, flexibility may be an issue; if something needs rushed to completion, or you genuinely need to be away from work to look after a sick kid, I don't mind throwing in some extra time, but I expect for you to put in extra hours later to make up for it, and let me take it easy for a bit.

      If I have to miss work to look after a sick kid, rest assured, I HAVE TO MISS WORK TO LOOK AFTER A SICK KID. The ONLY reasonable alternative is taking that sick kid to work with me, thus decreasing everyone else's productivity, not only my own. I will do my best to work longer hours at other times, but I do that anyways. I average over 40 hours a week, and I usually get more than my share of the work done.

      Single people often seem to have it out for people with kids because they feel like they're being taken advantage of. Yes, I need health insurance for my family. Guess what, not having it and thus having a sick kid decreases my productivity significantly more than any other factor. I also need to take time off occaisionally to take care of my kid. This happens. I will keep it under 2 hours (normal doctor's appt. time) or I will take vacation, and I won't do it unless necessary. I extend the same courtesy to my single coworkers. It's none of my business if they need to miss work for a few hours. I don't ask questions unless they are doing it an unreasonable amount, and so long as they are getting their work done.

      My grandmother, who has 6 children, had the same gripes about people taking too much time off as people here do. She could tell which parents were wasting their time off, and it made her upset. These were often the same parents who asked for sick day donations at the end of the year because they had used all of theirs. This isn't to say that she never had to take time off to care for her kids, but she understood that there are limits. I suspect the same is true for most of your married coworkers, and there really are only a few that are the troublemakers.

    107. Re:Fine... by Kahlus · · Score: 1

      That doesn't really work out. The cost to employers != the cost to see the movie. Unless you are only making $7.50 for two hours of work ;)

    108. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      the family people who are always taking days off or leaving early (without counting it as a vacation or sick day)
      If they're leaving work without comp, vacation or sick time, then it doesn't matter whether or not they have kids -- they're just slackers.

      If they're bailing and doing so legitimately, then that's an entirely another matter.

      Speaking as a 40-plus-work-week parent, in 25 years I'm not going to give a damn about how many lines of code I wrote or meetings I attended or widgets I churned out...what I'm going to remember and cherish is the time I spent with my children when they were young, at home, and eager to spend time with mom & dad.

      My philosophy is when you're at work, work. Work your ass off to ensure that your income is stable. But beyond that, screw corporate America since it means even less today than it did 50 years ago, and it means nothing when you're old, lonely, and living out your remaining days in a nursing home.

      Children are the most robust, long-lived project that most of us will ever work on, and if you give them the attention and effort one affords for "professional" endeavors, the payoff in the long run is much, much greater.

      Sorry to go off on a rant like that, but I felt compelled to defend the responsible worker-parents out there.
    109. Re:Fine... by TiggsPanther · · Score: 1

      I liked the policy one place I temped with had. Non-smokers were allowed equal time to nip outside for a non-smoke break. Good excuse to go outside for a quick chat and a (probably advisable) break from staring at a screen.

      --
      Tiggs
      "120 chars should be enough for everyone..."
    110. Re:Fine... by gentlemen_loser · · Score: 2, Insightful

      First off, this is supposed to be a lighthearted "this is what I'll be doing Wendesday evening" series of posts. Not this whining "married people make me work more" crap.

      But, since we're already talking about it and I'm too pissed off to talk Star Wars now...

      I've been on both sides of the fence. I've worked 80+ hour weeks and am now doing just about 40. The bottom line is this: if the company is having problems keeping everyone to about 40 hours a week - its the company's problem NOT anyone else's. Single people should head out at 5pm (or whatever the time happens to be) just like EVERYONE else.

      Now that being said, if your team is in a crunch (which is normal to happen from time to time), there is nothing wrong with putting in extra time to help the company get through the rough patches. However, if the company is constantly in a "rough spot" and demanding more hours of people constantly, there is a problem with the company not the employees.

      If you are single and being victimized, grow a pair and speak up for yourself. There is more to life than work. Like, Star Wars. ;-)

    111. Re:Fine... by aav · · Score: 1

      Wankers... Both you and the one who posted underneath you.

      Smokers tend to group and talk, which you do less. They think more than you do, which increases their productivity.
      This is their way of socialising.

      And you did take at least five minutes to masturbate. From a social point of view. As a matter of fact, at the time I'm writing this you took these five minutes 12 times only today, by posting on Slashdot. You just wasted more time online, typing not so well thought comments (to write euphemistically). How's your productivity better ?
      If you smoked, you'd at least have had gotten to learn something about the people you're working with. Hell, you don't even have to smoke to go out with them on a cigarette break.

      Having to go out for some fresh air, eh? Since you work mostly out of your office anyway, what are you complaining about ? You don't even know what you're talking about since you're not there most of the time anyway.

      And no, I'm not a smoker. I did smoke for years, and for all I know I might start again in the future, although not in the near one.

    112. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are called "Breeder's Benefits"

    113. Re:Fine... by Dysan2k · · Score: 1

      Amen, brother! I just stopped smoking, and it's KILLING me not being able to just get up and walk off for a little bit. Well, I can, but what would I do?

      --
      -What have you contributed lately?
    114. Re:Fine... by vze3try7 · · Score: 1

      My observation is that the less respnsibilities in life someone has, the less efficient they really are with their time. There are exceptions. However, often when meeting up with some single friends, I find they are always late, and I am always on time despitehaving to pack up two kids under the age of two. My observation has been the opposite of yours. It's the parents who are less productive and need to arrive late or leave early. Perhaps you have a guilty conscience?

    115. Re:Fine... by scrout · · Score: 0

      Please.
      I am sure when you die, your gravestone will remind everyone how "hard" you worked getting that latest snippet of code out.
      Obviously you live to work.
      What then, is your reward?

    116. Re:Fine... by gentlemen_loser · · Score: 1

      Since I've got some Karma to burn...

      You, my friend, are an asshole. Do you think that the people (single or otherwise) that are reading these posts NEED shit from you to make their live's even better? On top of that, whoever modded you to Insightful is also an asshole if they think that your rant about "people having kids" is somehow poeticly intelligent. I'm 28, married, with no kids - so don't even bother with the "your're just one of them crap". I do however consider myself open minded enough to have a heart about other peoples problems.

      I say this in the "nicest" way possible, FUCK OFF!

    117. Re:Fine... by jocknerd · · Score: 1

      I second that although if the single ones are getting less than me, they're celibate. There is no free time for mommy and daddy with twin 2 year olds in your house.

    118. Re:Fine... by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1

      If anyone dare complains, I point out the smokers and they usually shut up.

      A non-smoking co-worker of mine used to go out and stand around with the smokers when they took a break. When his boss complained, he replied "if you'd prefer I start smoking, I will." His boss eased off.

    119. Re:Fine... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      > Depending how you look at it, you aren't saving a life. You are just prolonging death.

      Saving life and prolonging death are, in essence, the same thing. No matter what you call it, it's worth doing.

      Chris Mattern

    120. Re:Fine... by Xugumad · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. I understand that people will always have something come up which limits _when_ they have time available. All I ask is that you put the time in elsewhere. I may be in an unusual situation where it is extremely easy for me to work from home (my work system is a laptop, so I just carry it to and from work), but I would have assumed that even if you're home looking after your kid, you can still get some work done, for example.

      In particular, I do feel we all have some responsibility to ensuring that the next generation grows up well. That my taxes go towards education for kids I don't have is a good thing. The key point here is that I pay taxes according to a method of calculation I feel is at least vaguely fair.

      Compare this to the situation where the single people in a group are expected to work longer so those with families can spend more time with them.
      This is a relatively arbitary amount of time, depending more on the ratio of people with and without families, than anythin else. This is what I don't like.

      Hope that all makes sense.

    121. Re:Fine... by glyph42 · · Score: 1

      That happens to me too. All the time. It also happens when I'm falling asleep. I think it's a state change in your brain, not the cool air. Taking a dump does something to clear your mind.

      --
      Music speeds up when you yawn, but does not change pitch.
    122. Re:Fine... by Xugumad · · Score: 1

      Unlike the responses so far, I'm actually okay with this. You have a previous appointment that you must keep, and that's fine. I'm even okay with wrapping up whatever you're working on, at the time.

      What I do ask, however, is that you return the favour. Put a few hours in sometime to help me out with what I'm doing, and I'm happy.

      Sound good to everyone?

    123. Re:Fine... by th3space · · Score: 1

      You know...some people who smoke are at least mildly conscientious of the fact that they should be working, not slowly killing themselves. Case in point, I only smoke two cigarettes during the work day...both on my unpaid lunchbreak, in my car, very very far away from the building proper, because god forbid one of the non-smokers ever have to grant me the privellege of doing whatever I want to myself in the out of doors.

      I also don't smoke at the zoo, outside of movie theaters, in restaurants (though it is legal in some parts of Dallas), or any other place I'm likely to get the evil eye or faux-coughs from non-smokers...not because I'm being kind, either (unless there are children about), but rather because I've just grown very tired of being treated like a second-class citizen because I choose to inhale massive amounts of carcinogens (it is a matter of choice, too...screw addiction, it's overrated).

      --
      "How like you to drag your keyboard to a gun fight." - Aaron Bedard (BANE)
    124. Re:Fine... by Anonymous+Coed · · Score: 1
      When it came time to "right-size" the organization, I and another non-smoker got the axe.

      Probably because the smokers were outside smoking (and networking) with the CEO.

    125. Re:Fine... by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1

      My company has special time off which is sort of general purpose emergency vacation which you can arrange with your boss to make up later. Pipes froze and burst overnight? Take the morning as off and make it up by working a little later next week. Helps people to not use up vacation, not lie about being sick, but still keep their lives moving.

      If I were a manager, "I have to leave two hours early every Friday to take my kids to practice" would NOT be acceptable without making it up somehow, perhaps by arriving two hours early on friday mornings, or working 30 minutes extra Monday through Thursday.

    126. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're hand don't count dude.

    127. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post pretty much summarizes why you're still single, sheesh.

    128. Re:Fine... by Inebrius · · Score: 1

      Great Rant. Maybe you should tell that to your boss, who has kids.

      Or to put things in perspective, you were once a kid. How cool would it have been if you were stuck in the nurses office with a bloody nose or with the flu, and had to wait until one of your parents has a lunch break? While you may not agree, our society makes concessions for raising children. While you may choose not to have kids, your parents did - and thus you've already reaped your benefits that you are now paying for.

      If you are stuck with the bad hours or travel, maybe you should be unavailable and have plans next time. You might get stuck with these assignments and hours because it is known that you are flexible and available, not just because you have no wife/kids.

    129. Re:Fine... by buckthorn · · Score: 1
      I'll join the parade here... this is an amazingly ignorant post, assuming that every single child out there was an unplanned pregnancy. Such mental blindness is unbelievable. Yes, there are unplanned pregnancies, just as there are unplanned car collisions, unplanned STD acquisition, and unplanned "format c:" commands issued. But some people actually choose to have children, or at least remove the barriers (pun intended) that prevent pregnancy on the theory that they'd like to have kids. In fact, if I understand correctly, there's an entire medical profession devoted to increasing the fertility of women. Imagine that.


      There is more to life than work. And while I agree that it's somewhat unfair that parents (yes, I am one) might be able to duck out of work to take care of a sick child or whatever, these instances should either consume vacation time or be few and far between. Any employer who just lets an employee wander off and get paid without using vacation is in trouble, no matter what the reason for the wandering.


      Somebody please mod the parent as flamebait, because the more I read it in attempting to reply, the more that's all I see.

    130. Re:Fine... by BridgeBum · · Score: 1

      Have a breath mint. Enjoy breathing fresh air. Get a coffee/tea/soda/water. Enjoy the sunlight.

      Congrats on stopping, good luck on trying to make it a permanent part of your life.

      --
      My UID is the product of 2 primes.
    131. Re:Fine... by BLAMM! · · Score: 1

      Been there. Done that. I think its just getting away from the problem that does it. You get your mind on other things and that gives it time to free associate and go down different paths.

    132. Re:Fine... by denidoom · · Score: 1
      All this smoking talk makes me want to go smoke right now. I'm especially salivating over the idea of standing in line for SW for hours and smoking. j/k... in CA you would be brutally blugeoned for smoking in line, unless everyone was drunk, and then you would have to listen to everyone talking and yelling loudly, which is more annoying than cigarette smoke any day.

      In fact the bozo in the cube over the wall is talking on his speaker phone and affecting my productivity. I can't concentrate, so am reading slashdot. It's not time for my smoke break yet (which is not every hour - I don't know how bosses put up with that frequency)

      --
      Lane Myer: I have great fear of tools. I once made a birdhouse in woodshop and the fair housing committee condemned it.
    133. Re:Fine... by zerocool^ · · Score: 1


      xactly. I don't mind working hard and working fast from 7AM to 6:30PM - if I have to put in an 11 hour day, I have to put in an 11 hour day. But, the kid is a previous recurring commitment. I don't really see how people can be pissed off about stuff like this.

      Not to mention: Your whole perspective changes with kids. I know it's cliche'd, but it's true. And sooner or later, most of our fellow loner 20-something slashdot readers will probably settle down and have a family.

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
    134. Re:Fine... by zerocool^ · · Score: 1


      Also, slashdot dropped this: "E"

      --
      sig?
    135. Re:Fine... by jjr1 · · Score: 1

      Your comment seems to imply that no one wants to travel. At least from personal experience it seems to me that the young, single people in general enjoy traveling for work and the married people (Especially with young children) would do just about anything to get out of it. I love traveling, some of my best stories are from all over the country, especially when I can do it on someone else's tab.

      --
      Best Trivia answer ever... Name the largest aquatic man eater... Contestant: Tsunami
    136. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was your boss a smoker?

    137. Re:Fine... by firedeveloper · · Score: 2, Informative

      For you Exempt (Salaried) employees in the US, the current judicial interpretations of the labor laws do not allow employers to deduct Time Off hours for partial days worked.

      In other words, a salaried employee cannot be docked 2 hours of vacation time for leaving early.

      Technically if you do ANY work for the company on a day, they cannot force you to take vacation hours. (So while you are at Disneyland with the kids, send a few work emails each night....)

      Your boss, however can give you grief (or fire you) for not completing the assigned tasks. - So don't abuse the privelige

    138. Re:Fine... by erlenic · · Score: 1

      When I was a smoker, I would have killed for a job that had that setup. While I enjoyed the smoke breaks, having to get up and walk outside was annoying.

    139. Re:Fine... by erlenic · · Score: 1

      I get plenty of BANG moments on the toilet, but they usually lead to me taking Immodium AD, not a breakthrough in my work.

      Seriously though, I know what you mean. I get eureka moments like that while driving, usually on my way home from work.

    140. Re:Fine... by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      My hand counts to 5!

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    141. Re:Fine... by erlenic · · Score: 1

      I used to make sure I exhaled a huge breath of smoke at anyone who gave me a fake cough. It sometimes gets them to leave.

    142. Re:Fine... by erlenic · · Score: 1

      I did that same thing when I quit smoking, because I missed the breaks.

    143. Re:Fine... by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      Fertility drugs and the resulting "amazing" multi-child pregnancies are the devil. I don't know if I can take any more of those friggin' "medical incredible" shows that talk about the woman who had 6 kids, and then just breifly mention that she was taking fertility drugs at the time. Damn it, God/Nature/etc didn't want her to have kids, that's why she was infertile. Not everyone is supposed to reproduce...

    144. Re:Fine... by itomato · · Score: 1

      "At least the smokers get that;"

      I'm sorry, but over here, the smokers are not concerned with their 10 minute Safety Break. They are killing themselves with Government Sponsored poisonous gasses. Near the public exits and entrances at that.

      If the flipside to smoking is reduced risk of Carpal-Tunnel, they ought to start marketing that. It would definately fly in a world (or country) where losing a war only means you're "not winning".

    145. Re:Fine... by Ogre332 · · Score: 1


      Most single people are used to picking up the slack of parents in the office, anyway. This time, it just gives the other people a chance to cut out for a day and make the family people who are always taking days off or leaving early (without counting it as a vacation or sick day) to cover them.

      Yeah, cause it's not like I've ever had to cover for a young single guy who spent all night drinking til he puked and is now "sick" and can't come in.

      --
      Shut up brain or I'll stab you with a Q-Tip. - Homer Simpson
    146. Re:Fine... by Anonymous+Slacker · · Score: 1

      Also part of the laws governing salaried employees, the companies are not required to compensate for work put in that comes in excess of the standard 40-45 hour work week that is typically expected.

      The company I work for is notorious for abusing this the past few years, especially after the tech market crash in 2000/2001.
      For a couple summers, we had mandatory 6 day/week, 10+ hr/day schedules, without any added compensation above our normal salaries aside from the vague promisies of 'comp days,' which by their unofficial status were virutally impossible to redeem.
      Fortunately the tech market has rebounded slightly in recent years, so the threat of mass layoffs has abated, and other companies are hiring occasionally so they don't dare abuse us quite so badly because we now do have options to work for someone else.

      --
      "If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice!" -Rush
    147. Re:Fine... by th3space · · Score: 1

      that's the best, isn't it? it's like a nice, tidy little package of revenge...all wrapped up in smokey goodness.

      --
      "How like you to drag your keyboard to a gun fight." - Aaron Bedard (BANE)
    148. Re:Fine... by pk2000 · · Score: 1

      I quit smoking 3 months ago. Now I do 25 push-ups and sit-ups every hour (started with 10) and then walk around a bit. Maybe 5-7 mins total...

    149. Re:Fine... by TopherC · · Score: 1

      I agree that taking a break from the computer screen for a few minutes can help a great deal, especially if I'm stuck on a problem or struggling with some code and don't have a clear enough vision of the whole thing. But the motivation for the break shouldn't come from an urge (chemical dependence), because then you don't have control over it, and it can just as easily derail you when you're on a roll.

      But your comment about smokers being marginalized and ostracized makes me think about the advertizing for tobacco products. You have to admire cigarette commercials since they not only have to deny reality, but even reverse it!

      The advertisements' messages are that smoking makes you more popular, more sexy, more free, and happier. But I've observed the exact opposite to be the truth. I don't know how they do it!

    150. Re:Fine... by Tetsujin28 · · Score: 1

      Congratulations, Glyph! You have discovered the power of excremeditation.

      --
      - - - -
      The real Tetsujin 28 is a giant robot.
    151. Re:Fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should do your thinking on the toilet, just like everyone else.

    152. Re:Fine... by k96822 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but is your solution crap? (ducks)

    153. Re:Fine... by k96822 · · Score: 1

      Why should I help you? I should do more of what I am supposed to be doing, not doing your job.

    154. Re:Fine... by Tiggs23 · · Score: 1

      Ahh, but technically the term means one who fucks his own mother.

      --
      "The question isn't who is going to let me; it's who is going to stop me." --Ayn Rand
    155. Re:Fine... by Xugumad · · Score: 1

      Because I stopped working on what I should be doing, to help you?

    156. Re:Fine... by k96822 · · Score: 1

      Oh, I see; you wrapped up the other person's work for them. My bad!

    157. Re:Fine... by buckthorn · · Score: 1

      Hey, I'm not saying that fertility drugs resulting in $multiple-tuplets are the cat's meow or dogs whiskers or whatever. I'm just taking issue with the idea that couples only get pregnant involuntarily and that some actually make efforts to get pregnant. The morality of said efforts is outside the scope of my message.

    158. Re:Fine... by Dekortage · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of that bumper sticker... "WORK HARDER! Millions on Welfare are Counting On You!"

      --
      $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
    159. Re:Fine... by blorg · · Score: 1

      Amen, brother! I just stopped smoking, and it's KILLING me not being able to just get up and walk off for a little bit. Well, I can, but what would I do?

      Have a drink...

    160. Re:Fine... by macmastery · · Score: 1

      Would that be "smoke-colored glasses"?

    161. Re:Fine... by Xugumad · · Score: 1

      I'd just like to repeat here is that I'm fine with putting in a little extra time because someone needs to pick up their kid from school, look after them when they're ill, etc., as long as they make the time up later.

      I'm sure everyone occaisionally has something that means they have to leave work early (mine tends to involve something going horribly wrong with the flat I live in, but that's another story entirely), and kids are just one particularly common example. They key point though, is that you make the time up later.

      If you have to pick up your kid from school, come in for a few hours at the weekend. If you have to stay home for a day to look after them when they're ill, maybe you could do some work from home?

      If you consistently cannot meet the time requirements of your work, for whatever reason, the answer is NOT to place an addition burden on your colleagues, the answer is to get a job with less hours.

    162. Re:Fine... by Xugumad · · Score: 1

      When you're the single person in the office, you don't have as much free time and social life as the married people think you do.
      Additionally, if you're the single one in an office full of married people, I would suggest you need as much time as you can get to devote to your social life (or maybe this is just me)...

    163. Re:Fine... by Shadowlore · · Score: 1

      I got tired of losing out on "smoke breaks", so I started taking my own breaks when I needed them - at 30 to 50 minutes per pop. Just hop up and vaporize.


      In the Army, we did something similiar. Everytime the smokers would go outside the motorpool for a "smoke break", we'd go sit down for a "non-smoke break", or take an equal amount of time after they got back for a "not around the smoke remnants" break. It took only a few days of this to "get caught". The smoke breaks were ended on the spot.

      --
      My Suburban burns less gasoline than your Prius.
    164. Re:Fine... by Shadowlore · · Score: 1

      The problem is that while everyoen tends to get the same amount of sick/vacation/PTO days in any given company, I think it is quite common for parents to come in late, leave early, take time out of the middle of the day or not come in at all and not have it subtracted from their alotted accured vacation/sick/PTO days.

      And that is where a lot of single people get frustrated.


      Single people get theirs around here. Days they are expecting a delivery with nobody to pick it up, cable or dsl getting installed, they are "sick", mysterious car breakdowns (and nobody to brign them in). Most of our single people leave just as often as the married people. Thing is, most single people don't see it because they are too busy focusing on the married people. Single people around here are gone just as much for "dentist appointments", "doctor visits", "not feeling well I'll work from home today", and so on as married people are for their kids. I've seen peolpe stay home to take care of their sick {boy,girl}friend. Or their dogs.

      That said married people are exposed to sickness causing germs and virii at a much greater frequency than single people (excepting STDs in the general case). Thus they are more likely to get sick.

      Further, if they are salaried, and you are salaried, maybe they simply know more than you about what they can and can't do. Maybe you just don't have the balls/ovaries to say you are leaving early. if you are salaried and leave an hour or two early, or arrive late or take an hour or two off during the day, your pay can't legally be reduced either. Yup, look it up. If you are salaried and leave two hours early in an 8 hour shift, no pay can legally be docked for time missed. If they are paid hourly, have you verified they get paid for being there when they aren't? if not, you are being less than honest in your assessment.

      If you are salaried, being gone midday for enough time to go see SW does not automatically mean a reduction in pay; single or married. Maybe it's time to get out from behind the keyboard warriror persona and live a life? Quit whining about others and take care of yourself?

      Maybe you should quit whining and start learning. Learning about how often single people leave as well as the rules regarding salaried, hourly, and time away.

      --
      My Suburban burns less gasoline than your Prius.
    165. Re:Fine... by Shadowlore · · Score: 1

      If I need to pick him up from school early, I lose the hours. If your company doesn't enforce it, then blame your company as well.

      If you are salaried, you need to blame your company for illegally reducing your wages for leaving a bit early (assuming you are in the US).

      --
      My Suburban burns less gasoline than your Prius.
  2. Jobs? What jobs? by luna69 · · Score: 5, Funny

    What self-respecting SW fan still has a JOB? They're all in line already. The loss will be negligible. There might even be a net increase in productivity.

    --
    No gods, no demons, and no masters. Secular Humanism!
    1. Re:Jobs? What jobs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit, I've been in front of Grauman's Chinese Theatre since March. I no longer have a job, apartment, girlfriend (ok, yeah, ha ha, this is /.), life, but dammit, I just know that I'll be the first one to see this movie, dammit. It's just going to happen...

    2. Re:Jobs? What jobs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... I want to mod this "Funny, but True"...

    3. Re:Jobs? What jobs? by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually, I'm glad I have the job I do. The boss has already done the same thing he did 3 years ago: He declared the day St. Lucas day, closed down the business, and paid for everyone in the company to come along and see the movie.

      We have strange holidays. In the past few years, we've had 3 St. Tolkein days, 3 St. Rowling days, a St. Roddenberry day, a few St. Warchowski Days, and even one or two St. Lee days (which he also called St. Stan-the-man days). Oh, and last Friday was St. Adams day, but there was some confusion about exactly when that day was, since everyone had towels wrapped around their heads so the ravenous bugblatter beast of Traal couldn't see us.

      Ahhhh.

      It's good to be the boss.

    4. Re:Jobs? What jobs? by bcrowell · · Score: 2, Funny

      What self-respecting SW fan still has a JOB?
      More to the point, what self-respecting Star Wars fan has ever gotten laid? I couldn't care less about opening night, but I do plan to call in sick for the first day's internet availability of Natalie-Portman-pregnant-with-twins photoshopped porn.

    5. Re:Jobs? What jobs? by michaeldot · · Score: 5, Funny

      So how long has your boss been the manager of the comic book store?

    6. Re:Jobs? What jobs? by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I think you missed the point.

      My boss is the manager of a data mining company which has been working on branching out into video production over the past few years. (The entire point of starting the data mining was to pay for starting the video production company and to do it right, which included producing only quality scripts and making sure the employees could enjoy their work and focus only on producing a good product -- not on meeting deadlines.)

      He is not a manager of a comic book store.

      I should know.

      I am my boss -- just in case you missed it from my comment previously, where I said:

      Ahhhhhh.

      It's good to be the boss.

    7. Re:Jobs? What jobs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dear TheWanderingHermit,
      I hereby submit my resume for your consideration.
      Sincerely,
      Everyone on slashdot.

    8. Re:Jobs? What jobs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > the first day's internet availability of
      > Natalie-Portman-pregnant-with-twins photoshopped
      > porn

      I can't believe I hadn't thought of this already...

      Hmmmm! Ok, let me open Photoshop...

    9. Re:Jobs? What jobs? by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 1

      Dear Everyone on Slashdot:

      Thank you for your resume. We want to make sure potential employees have experience with the software we use. Could you please submit proof of of at least:

      - 7 years experience on Windows 2000
      - 2 years experience on OpenOffice 2.0
      - 1 year experience with Debian Sarge since it went stable

      --------
      Seriously, I don't want to do much more hiring with the data mining business. I'm a writer by avocation. The data mining is mostly automated, so once the income goes high enough, I'll sell it and use the money to maintain the scripwriting and video production business -- that way I (and most of the people I work with) can do what we enjoy without having to worry about keeping a software program running.

    10. Re:Jobs? What jobs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      without having to worry about keeping a software program running.

      Or you could spend a few more man-years automating it more, retire, and let the computer run the company for you while you do what you enjoy ;)

    11. Re:Jobs? What jobs? by trelanexiph · · Score: 1

      - 7 years experience on Windows 2000 nt4 wasn't suffering enough for you? - 2 years experience on OpenOffice 2.0 ditto open office 1! (though 2.0 is absolutely beautiful) - 1 year experience with Debian Sarge since it went stable it went stable 3 years ago, debian just forgot to release it ;) One inquiry about the company, you will declare a St Orson day when the Ender's Game movie comes out right? What is the company's Policy on St Rick (Berman) days (I hope there will be none of these).

    12. Re:Jobs? What jobs? by geekmule · · Score: 1

      Probably a Massive increase in productivity! All those who worship at the alter of Lucas will get off the office computers where they've been surfing for the latest SW tidbit or press slober and free up bandwidth.

      Really, how can any self-respecting adult still get into this poorly-acted, horribly written adolescent fantasy of Lucas? Quick, jump off the cliff with the rest of the idiots!

    13. Re:Jobs? What jobs? by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 1

      I think you missed the joke...

      Windows 2k has been out only 5 years, OpenOffice 2.0 isn't even out, and, while Debian thinks Sarge will go stable at month's end, those of us who have been watching expect it on a VERY cold day...

      I have mixed feelings about Berman. I came damn close to writing for Trek, even pitched stories to Ron Moore (my agent had helped Ron get started and worked with Okuda and Sternbach, and was even mentioned in a thank you or two in their books). I don't know how much of the chance I had was because of or in spite of Berman.

      I do think Michael Piller did a good job (and I'm told he's the one that eventually read some of my work and liked it -- when my agent called and asked if I still wanted to pitch, she said, "I was having lunch with Michael the other day," and I cut her off and said, "Michael who?" When she said, "Piller," as if I should have known, I coughed, choked on the water I was drinking, spewed it, and fell back against the counter in surprise).

      Basically I keep the company small, since every employee is that much less that goes in the pot for movie making and the trust fund that I want to establish to keep the production biz going (it's also less I can spend if I need/want to), so it's a small, interesting team, and I know when certain movies come out, we won't get a damn thing done anyway, so we might as well make a day out of it.

    14. Re:Jobs? What jobs? by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 1

      While I LOVE programming in Perl, and enjoy Java (the only two languages we use), and I like working with my clients (most of whom hardly ever call, since everything runs so smoothly), as long as we've got that as part of the business, it means I, and others, have to consider things like checking regular log reports to make sure everything runs well, as well as dealing with clients who somehow find another bug.

      Then there's the nature of data mining. If a source changes their HTML layout, it needs immediate attention (and even if I'm "unreachable" on vacation, I hear about it and am on edge until I know it's resolved). If, by chance, a source disappears, we have to move quickly to replace that source, or lose the customers.

      That's the biggest part of the worries. Even with it automated, a data source can go bad, and if it's unique, we lose that data. I'll be much happier when that is someone else's problem. When that happens, I'll have the money, it'll be in a trust fund for me and the vid/movie biz, and all I have to worry about are the things I've wanted to focus on for my whole life. I dont' want to sound cold, but once I sell it, if a data source dries up, it is not my problem or worry.

    15. Re:Jobs? What jobs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grauman's Chinese Theatre? The one in Hollywood? That's 3 hours behind the approximately 15 million screens on the east coast that will start the movie at 1 second past midnight eastern standard time? Unless you've got some way of creating a countrywide power outage for 3 hours and 2 seconds, I think your dream of being the first to see the movie must sadly die.

    16. Re:Jobs? What jobs? by anakin876 · · Score: 1

      where are you based? are you looking for more "miners?" I do have some experience with audio and video hardware.

    17. Re:Jobs? What jobs? by geoffybiggins · · Score: 1

      So, what do I have to do to get a job there? You guys hiring?

    18. Re:Jobs? What jobs? by laie_techie · · Score: 1

      A month ago, one of my clients (I'm self-employed) told me he'd pay me to take the 19th off. I live in a smallish city, so I'll be in line by 8:30 PM, possibly in costume.

    19. Re:Jobs? What jobs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best...comment...ever!

    20. Re:Jobs? What jobs? by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      And here's the best part.

      Your boss doesnt mind you posting to Slashdot all day. Heck, he even responds to AC's for you!

    21. Re:Jobs? What jobs? by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      I think you missed the joke.

    22. Re:Jobs? What jobs? by rednip · · Score: 1
      I know when certain movies come out, we won't get a damn thing done anyway, so we might as well make a day out of it.
      You should keep your reciepts, any good accountant would call it a 'team-building exercise'.
      --
      The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
    23. Re:Jobs? What jobs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the joke was dumb.

  3. Got my 12:01am Thursday tickets... by DarkBlackFox · · Score: 1

    It's going to be a fun day at the office Thursday :-)

    1. Re:Got my 12:01am Thursday tickets... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am in the process of getting mine as well, it's the only way to go, but I don't have to work until 2 pm thursday, but wednesday night I'm going to be leaving work early.

    2. Re:Got my 12:01am Thursday tickets... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you're going to roll in all depressed cause this one sucked too. You'll get together with the rest of the clique by the water cooler where everyone reluctantly agrees. And then one of the 'normals' will come in, having overheard, and interject their opinion: "I told you so."

      Then after work, you'll drive to Las Vegas and get a hooker like you dad should have done when you were 15, and sliding into an isolated fantasy world.

    3. Re:Got my 12:01am Thursday tickets... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's the only way to go

      Umm...

      I beg differ?

    4. Re:Got my 12:01am Thursday tickets... by rynthetyn · · Score: 1

      I've got my 12:01am tickets too, I couldn't help it even though I didn't really like Eps 1 or 2. That won't be as bad though as when Ep. 2 came out because even though I didn't go to the midnight showing, it came out while I was in the middle of an incredibly grueling Mayterm statistics class and I went to see the movie on opening day rather than study for my test the next day.

      --
      Eagles may soar, but weasles don't get sucked into jet engines...
  4. Don't forget lost education.... by GrpA · · Score: 1

    I'm going to convince my kids to play hookey and they can come along too!

    --
    Enjoy science fiction? "Turing Evolved" - AI, Mecha, Androids and rail-gun battles. What more could you want?
    1. Re:Don't forget lost education.... by aheath · · Score: 1

      My son and I decided to pass on the 12:01 a.m. show or any of the the morning shows so that he can put in a full day at school. I am taking a vacation day next Thursday so that I can pick up my son after school and take him to the 3:30 p.m. showing.

    2. Re:Don't forget lost education.... by seann · · Score: 1

      you weren't born in this country were you?
      (American, Canada)

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    3. Re:Don't forget lost education.... by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1, Funny

      you weren't born in this country were you? (American, Canada)

      There's a country called American?

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    4. Re:Don't forget lost education.... by StratoChief66 · · Score: 5, Funny

      dude, your sig is awesome, either that or you should really take a look at your sig cause Mike fuckin hates you.

      --
      Frylock: "We should have cloned twenties, Jackson wouldn't have given a fuck."
    5. Re:Don't forget lost education.... by coopex · · Score: 0

      It's a little known fact: it's really spelt American, but the n is silent. We don't correct people cause we don't wanna sound french.

      --
      The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
    6. Re:Don't forget lost education.... by flynns · · Score: 1

      This is a classical definition of a Baggy Pantsing.

      http://catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/B/baggy-pantsing. html

      --
      'If you're flammable and have legs, you are never blocking a fire exit.'
  5. not me. by Deamos · · Score: 1

    I learned my lesson with Episodes one and two.

    There are two things at play here, how bad those two movies were, and the fact that I can no longer properly function on 3 hours of sleep in an a non-emergency work situation.

    --
    "We're so tough we're made of nerf!" --D&D Character Tagline
  6. work? by venomkid · · Score: 1

    ...what's that?

    --
    vk.
  7. Skipping work cost ME by TLouden · · Score: 1

    Well, that's because I work for myself. But I still wouldn't go the first days, lines too long and theater is too crowded. I'll be working like normal until a good weekend a few weeks after release and then...I'll be out of town and busy with SATs so maybe I'll just rent it, maybe.

    --
    -Tim Louden
    1. Re:Skipping work cost ME by hankaholic · · Score: 1

      I agree that it's totally not worth the crowds just to see a [pre/se]qual to some of the most overrated movies of all time. I'll see it in theaters sometime, as it's gotten much more favorable reviews than the train wrecks for which Lucas is recently known, but definitely not while the crowds are in full effect.

      However, you cite being "out of town" as a reason for not seeing it in theaters. Just how "out of town" will you be that there won't be a theater showing this nearby?

      --
      Somebody get that guy an ambulance!
    2. Re:Skipping work cost ME by TLouden · · Score: 1

      3-hours drive from the nearest highschool in hawaii out of town. I know this because I'll be making the commute to take SAT IIs during one of the days that I'm there. I believe the nearest theater (showing it or not) is in the same place.

      --
      -Tim Louden
    3. Re:Skipping work cost ME by hankaholic · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the reply!

      Right now I'm living in Pittsburgh, but I often miss living in less populated areas because I found it much less distracting without three Starbuck's within walking distance.

      I actually walked more when living in the country, but less often, because walking was an excuse to contemplate for a few hours where it's now a twenty minute coffee break.

      At any rate, good luck with your studies!

      --
      Somebody get that guy an ambulance!
    4. Re:Skipping work cost ME by goneutt · · Score: 1

      Your "less populated areas" are getting Star Bucked.

      I live in Tyler, Texas. About 100 miles east of Dallas, population ~ 80k. I'm within walking distance of two full starbucks, and another in the Barnes&igNoble. Not quite country, that down the street from me.

      And its dry, no beer.

      --
      Bacardi + slashdot = negative karma.
    5. Re:Skipping work cost ME by TLouden · · Score: 1

      Yes, the city is all too distracting at times but I've found recently that a stroll through the park with my girlfriend can remove the stress and distractions of the city. My friends and I make it a point to know where to go to get away from the busy streets and drive through coffee stops. The parks, botanic gardens, even just a friendly neighborhood, they all provide an escape even if it's just for 30 minutes during lunch. I don't know Pittsburgh at all but you might try finding a park somewhere nearby, baby ducks where hatching a month ago and while they're grown up a bit they're still quite cute.
      Enjoy, because Life Is Good

      --
      -Tim Louden
    6. Re:Skipping work cost ME by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      baby ducks where hatching a month ago and while they're grown up a bit they're still quite cute

      That's right. Your post just reminded me that all Hawai'ians are flaming homosexuals.

      Just kidding. I like cute baby ducks too :(

    7. Re:Skipping work cost ME by TLouden · · Score: 1

      Actually, I've never been to Hawaii. I'm in Denver and while I support lgbt watching baby ducks with my girlfriend hardly seems homosexual.

      --
      -Tim Louden
    8. Re:Skipping work cost ME by hankaholic · · Score: 1

      Out of curiosity, I just searched for a Starbucks near the area where I used to live. The nearest is 15 miles away -- hardly within walking distance (I've walked almost that far, but not for a coffee break), with none closer than that "Coming soon" either.

      --
      Somebody get that guy an ambulance!
    9. Re:Skipping work cost ME by th3space · · Score: 1

      And the Tyler Zoo is awful ;)

      On the other hand, The End of Julia and Mineral come from Tyler, so it's not all bad.

      Still...baaaaaad zoo.

      --
      "How like you to drag your keyboard to a gun fight." - Aaron Bedard (BANE)
  8. Fuck that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    People have to learn to live off of 3 hours of sleep. The movie start at midnight on Wednesday. It will be over at 2:30am. I'll be home be 3am. Asleep by 4am and wake up at 7am. Typical night for a programmer.

    1. Re:Fuck that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awesome part of being a newspaper paginator? Off at 11:30, movie at midnight, asleep by 3 a.m. ... 11 hours later, wake up and go to work.

      Yeah, I don't miss getting out of IT at all. Except for the making-half-as-much part, but, eh. Better than not having a job at all.

    2. Re:Fuck that by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      " The movie start at midnight on Wednesday. It will be over at 2:30am. I'll be home be 3am. Asleep by 4am and wake up at 7am. Typical night for a programmer."

      Just think, if the people who went to see this movie brought dates, Lucas'd make twice as much!!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:Fuck that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really really tried, but I couldn't find a date...

      ... willing to suffer through another "Lucas movie"

    4. Re:Fuck that by kv9 · · Score: 1

      yes, because the theaters would magically double their size to let twice as many people in. i know i know, it`s as bad as a joke as your`s.

  9. Cross-promotion by FunWithHeadlines · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Wait, let me get this straight: The New York Post is hyping how popular they think the Fox Movie studio distributing the movie Revenge of the Sith will be. OK, let's see...New York Post (owned by Rupert Murdoch's News Corp). Check. Fox (owned by Rupert Murdoch's News Corp). Check. Cross-promotion? Check. Getting Slashdot to hype this to the fanboys? Check.

    Somehow, I'm not a bit surprised. :)

    1. Re:Cross-promotion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right-wing? Just because someone's bitching about Rupert Murdoch doesn't mean it has to be political.

      If you had just said "conspiracy" or "corporate conspiracy" I'd have no problem with it, but politics doesn't even enter into this equation.

    2. Re:Cross-promotion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of /.'s base are belong to Rupert Murdoch? Check.

    3. Re:Cross-promotion by Colm+Buckley · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This appears to be actually official policy in News Corp - many of its organs are used to cross-promote the others. This is most noticeable when it's grating, such as Sky News showing up in 20C Fox movies, but they can also be fairly subtle - such as this example.

      The British satirical magazine Private Eye has a fairly regular section devoted exposing News Corp. cross-media plugs.

    4. Re:Cross-promotion by poopdeville · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's nothing particularly right-wing-ed about this conspiracy.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    5. Re:Cross-promotion by Ricdude · · Score: 1

      No different than CNN hawking Harry Potter and Austin Powers...

      In this case, it's not a right wing conspiracy, it's a "no media diversity" issue.

      --
      How's my programming? Call 1-800-DEV-NULL
    6. Re:Cross-promotion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Run for editor. I'd vote for you. ;-) Seriously, it would be nice for the self-promoting BS to get filtered out. The only real story there is we wrote it and lots of people believed it. What's the basis for the estimate that over half the people who saw the last one on the first two days missed work to do so? Nothing worth printing, I'd wager.

    7. Re:Cross-promotion by kfg · · Score: 1

      Rupert: Hey, Rupert. You're running that piece on Star Wars, right?

      Rupert: Well, duh!

      Rupert: Ok, don't get your knickers in a twist, I was just checking.

      Rupert: No problemo, but, just to be safe, don't tell anyone we had this little chat. They might suspect a conspiracy.

      Rupert: What chat? Who are you?

      Rupert: Muahahahahah!

      KFG

    8. Re:Cross-promotion by FunWithHeadlines · · Score: 1

      I never said anything about right-wing, that was the other guy. And I agree with you about CNN and Time-Warner pushing their own movies. All I was doing was pointing out that this was a non-story story designed to push ticket sales. It just happened to be Murdoch doing it this time.

    9. Re:Cross-promotion by FunWithHeadlines · · Score: 1
      "Run for editor. I'd vote for you. ;-)"

      Thank you! Sadly, it will never work. If I were editor, /. would have fewer self-promotion stories, and lots more pointless but quirkily humorous stories that have nothing to do with technology, is not news for nerds, and hardly contains stuff that matters.

      Oh wait, that's the current regime...

    10. Re:Cross-promotion by Jim_Callahan · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yeah, but this is slashdot. If it isn't actively burning wealthy owners to death, selling their women and childern into slavery, and using the money to fund the INternational Socialist Org, then it's a right-wing conspiracy ;)

      --
      ...it's really a sad day for America when we require a goddamn ACT OF CONGRESS to make our DVD players work properly. ~
    11. Re:Cross-promotion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's nothing particularly right-wing-ed about this conspiracy.

      x-winged maybe?

    12. Re:Cross-promotion by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 1

      You are quite right. And the annoying thing is that they are not being creative. Exactly the same story was ran before the other movies premiered. If they want to be whores they should at least try to find some newer angles on this, so they don't repeat themselves. But maybe its not a problem coz readers of the NY Post seem to have short memories.

    13. Re:Cross-promotion by Threni · · Score: 1

      > This appears to be actually official policy in News Corp - many of its organs
      > are used to cross-promote the others.

      It's not even simply policy - it's part of the business model. Sky One, a murdoch satellite channel in the UK, appears to exist solely to promote their other (generally more expensive) channels.

    14. Re:Cross-promotion by shmlco · · Score: 1
      Exactly the same story was ran before the other movies premiered

      Of course, it could also simply be a standard hack writing assignment.

      Who's covering Groundhog's Day? Check. Mother's Day flower sales? Check. Star Wars fanatical fan story? Check.

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    15. Re:Cross-promotion by CUGWMUI · · Score: 1
      Cross promotion is a way of life. Everyone does it.

      In Mumbai, India, there are atleast two firms which own both a newpaper http://www.timesofindia.com/ http://www.mid-day.com/ as well as a radio station http://www.radiomirchi.com/ http://www.go925fm.com/ (one of them owns a TV channel http://www.zoomtelevision.com/ and web portal http://www.indiatimes.com/ too).

      There are radio shows where the RJ practically reads out the newspaper article. Not to mention the radio station's "teaser" comments about the next day's newspaper headline, or a dedicated column in the newspaper providing a prelude to a TV show at night.

      A personal peeve is when one of the radio stations decided to promote a movie, with the RJs giving it fantastic reviews, completely omitting the fact that the movie was produced by the company owning the radio station.

    16. Re:Cross-promotion by Captain+Large+Face · · Score: 1

      IIRC, the section is named "EYE SKY".

    17. Re:Cross-promotion by cp.tar · · Score: 1
      There's nothing particularly right-wing-ed about this conspiracy.

      X-Wing, Y-Wing, Z-Wing... I don't seem to recall a right-wing, though.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    18. Re:Cross-promotion by miu · · Score: 1

      Fanatics think anyone not marching to their anthem and singing their jingle is the enemy, to such persons anyone pointing out that a corporate news organization may be more interested in self serving hype than news must be a conspiracy theorist.

      --

      [Set Cain on fire and steal his lute.]
    19. Re:Cross-promotion by Refrag · · Score: 1

      You're right, it's a fascist conspiracy.

      --
      I have a website. It's about Macs.
    20. Re:Cross-promotion by th3space · · Score: 1

      Do you honestly think that this article - from a paper that many hold in very, very low esteem, somewhere just above used toilet paper - will generate ticket sales? The people are going to go see this movie because they want to see this movie, not because they will read things of this nature and say to themselves, "Hey! I'm going to cost my company some money, too!"

      I'd say this is more likely just a piece to demonstrate the financial impact of a potential blockbuster, beyond just generating income for Lucasarts. Everyone I know already had their tickets before this article hit the net, and chances are, finding tickets to the good theaters in the Dallas metroplex at this point would be almost futile.

      --
      "How like you to drag your keyboard to a gun fight." - Aaron Bedard (BANE)
  10. I'm going, but so is my staff by pwnage · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Not only am I going to Star Wars next week, I'm planning on taking my staff as well. So I guess I'll be the one responsible for the loss of productivity in my own area. Oh well, c'est la vie.

    --
    Reminder: Apple owns 1/255th of the internet.
    1. Re:I'm going, but so is my staff by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Hey boss, mind if I stay at work?

    2. Re:I'm going, but so is my staff by pwnage · · Score: 1

      Sure, more popcorn for me!

      --
      Reminder: Apple owns 1/255th of the internet.
    3. Re:I'm going, but so is my staff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm planning on taking my staff as well.

      We don't get many shepherds here on /.

    4. Re:I'm going, but so is my staff by FunWithHeadlines · · Score: 1, Funny
      "Oh well, c'est la vie"

      Ah! You're French. That explains the lack of productivity and willingness to take unnecessary days off.

    5. Re:I'm going, but so is my staff by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Ah! You're French. That explains the lack of productivity and willingness to take unnecessary days off.
      Actually, that the french manage to be the 5th economy with only a fifth the population of the USA and despite their 5 week holidays and so many days off clearly indicates that they are far more efficient workers than the americans...
    6. Re:I'm going, but so is my staff by Aggrav8d · · Score: 1

      I thought you were supposed to take your staff to the next Harry Potter film ...or, more appropriately, a discworld movie.

    7. Re:I'm going, but so is my staff by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      Yeah, just imagine if we (Americans) got to work a six hour day and get real vacation time...that'd be ever so sweet. I already spend two hours a day at work zoning out/chatting/popcaping/slashdotting/homestarrunnin g/emailing/etceteraing. I'd much rather spend that time at home. Three hours, fifteen minute lunch, three hours. I could work three hard hours straight without blinking.

      If it was introduced by trial and productivity had to stay the same or increase, you bet your shoes that I'd make it increase and keep it there.

    8. Re:I'm going, but so is my staff by beerits · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, that the french manage to be the 5th economy with only a fifth the population of the USA and despite their 5 week holidays and so many days off clearly indicates that they are far more efficient workers than the americans...

      or not

      California alone would be around the 5th largest economy in the world and it has about half the population of France.

      USA GDP per capita $40,100

      France GDP per capita $28,700

    9. Re:I'm going, but so is my staff by l3v1 · · Score: 1

      But, sadly (?) America is not California alone.

      --
      I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
    10. Re:I'm going, but so is my staff by anakin876 · · Score: 1

      ah yes, but does your staff have a knob on the end? If it doesn't, you must be a wizard!

    11. Re:I'm going, but so is my staff by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Not only am I going to Star Wars next week, I'm planning on taking my staff as well

      Yes, because that worked very well for Paul Reubens.

    12. Re:I'm going, but so is my staff by BackInIraq · · Score: 2, Interesting

      California alone would be around the 5th largest economy in the world and it has about half the population of France.

      USA GDP per capita $40,100

      France GDP per capita $28,700


      But straight GDP per capita isn't necessarily the best measure of worker efficiency. I'd bet that if you compare GDP to man-hours worked, the numbers for France and California are a little closer. France might even come out ahead. Because having a 40% higher (give or take) GDP per capita isn't as impressive if your people are working 20%-30% (if not higher) more hours per capita each year.

      (Often I would waste time actually going and finding these numbers, so my case would be stronger...but today I'm actually trying to get some work done. Damn job.)

    13. Re:I'm going, but so is my staff by Herr_Nightingale · · Score: 1

      Don't you think it's better to WAIT this time, and perhaps d/l a bit of the torrent before it comes out as a preview? Might prevent Phantom & CLones repeats.. save a few dollars and the 2 hours of your life that you'll be begging to have back if it's even a fraction as awful as the last two "Star Wars" episodes.. maybe you should rent Phantom Menace first, to be reminded.

      Wait for the download edition, see if it's worth the theatre premium.

    14. Re:I'm going, but so is my staff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>Wait for the download edition, see if it's worth the theatre premium

      download edition? dude, it's not SUSE...

    15. Re:I'm going, but so is my staff by nmg196 · · Score: 1

      You're confused.
      You should take your staff to Lord of the Rings.
      You should take your *light sabre* to Star Wars.
      They don't have staffs in Star Wars so you'll look *really* uncool.

    16. Re:I'm going, but so is my staff by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Yoda has a staff. Of course I suspose that only works if you are really old, short, green, and have big ears.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    17. Re:I'm going, but so is my staff by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      In Discworld, your luggage takes YOU on vacation!

      (Hey, someone had to do it...)

  11. This is Ridic. by kryogen1x · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Kids at my school drove through red lights at twelve midnight to get tickets (they bought a whole row), and now they're scalping them at my school. They're so afraid that the tickets will be stolen, that they carry knives with them. The movie's sold out at the local theatre now, and I blame them.

    1. Re:This is Ridic. by hunterx11 · · Score: 3, Funny
      Perhaps they should carry lightsabers.

      No seriously, cheap plastic swords made in China are probably more than sufficient to keep anyone who would steal a ticket to Star Wars at bay.

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    2. Re:This is Ridic. by SharkJumper · · Score: 1

      Forget cheap plastic. I'm making a real one.

      SharkJumper

  12. In other news... by shakezula · · Score: 5, Funny

    Star Wars Episode III will also consume 38.75% of the total available Internet bandwidth once a 1337 CAM is torrented.

    --
    I know what you're thinking. Did I forward 65,535 packets or 65,536 packets?
    1. Re:In other news... by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1
    2. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh my god. they're pirating the game and the trailer. quick, find cover.

  13. Not to be a spoilsport here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but after Episode 1, that part of my childhood was killed deader than Boba Fett in a Sarlac's digestive tract...

    I couldn't take any more pain-- So I skipped episode 2. I'll do the same with 3.

    1. Re:Not to be a spoilsport here... by Gondola · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Funny thing is, according to the short stories about the bounty hunters, Boba didn't die in the Sarlacc pit.

    2. Re:Not to be a spoilsport here... by UlfGabe · · Score: 1

      we all know this, he blows it up with his jetpack and has problems for the rest of his life with cancer and such.

      he brings in the butcher of mon seralit or something and gets all the money he ever wanted, then he has a chance to kill Han and doesn't, because he rules that much.

      he rules. ig88 drools.

      --
      Check journal for info on Anti-TextBook, an idea by me.
    3. Re:Not to be a spoilsport here... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      Boba didn't die in the Sarlacc pit.

      No, he was kept alive for around 100 years in a VERY SLOW and PAINFUL digestion. :)

    4. Re:Not to be a spoilsport here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      1000 years.

    5. Re:Not to be a spoilsport here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he was kept alive for around 100 years in a VERY SLOW and PAINFUL digestion. :)

      Original poster here. That was exactly my point. And it was 1000 years.

    6. Re:Not to be a spoilsport here... by mesach · · Score: 1

      What the hell is down there to eat for 1000 years?

      --
      moo.
    7. Re:Not to be a spoilsport here... by emurphy42 · · Score: 1

      No, he was later revealed to have escaped. ("The Sarlaac found me somewhat indigestible.")

    8. Re:Not to be a spoilsport here... by UrlorJkron · · Score: 2, Funny

      He wasn't the only one to fall in the pit...

      --
      The public will believe anything, so long as it is not founded on truth. --Edith Sitwell
    9. Re:Not to be a spoilsport here... by TuringTest · · Score: 1

      So actually the Sarlaac digestive tract was a life-expander?

      --
      Singularity: a belief in the "God" idea with the "demiurge" relation inverted.
    10. Re:Not to be a spoilsport here... by smorpheus · · Score: 1

      What kind of geeks are you all? The Sarlacc was a creature that not only absorbed the bodies of it's victims, but also their very minds.

      In fact, what Boba encounters down there is quite horrifying.

      It kept you alive by digesting and absorbing your memories and your mind long after your body had been disentegrated.

  14. Already planned out... by HungSoLow · · Score: 2, Informative
    Going at noon on the release date!

    Remember though... safety in numbers .. get a large group together and you'll likely stave off any tight-assed managers from complaining.

    1. Re:Already planned out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tight-assed managers

      As opposed to loose-assed managers?

  15. Funny math by groke · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Using the numbers on the article, each of the 4.8 million employed people who will see the movie will play hooky for the full day.

    So, if I want to go to a 7pm showing, I'll be costing my company my time for the whole day?

    Something smells a little fishy..

    1. Re:Funny math by iamlucky13 · · Score: 1

      In other news, the New York Post pulls yet another really big number out of a hat in order to continue their mission of providing sensationalist "news."

  16. Did anyone else notice... by DanthemaninVA1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...that they got the title of the movie wrong?

    1. Re:Did anyone else notice... by WiKKeSH · · Score: 3, Funny

      Doesn't really matter at this point, does it?

      They could call it "Star Warz Episode Tres: Moneybags" and the same people would see it anyways. :)

    2. Re:Did anyone else notice... by Kn0xy · · Score: 1

      It was a mind trick.

    3. Re:Did anyone else notice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Star Wars: The Search For More Money

    4. Re:Did anyone else notice... by imess · · Score: 1, Funny

      ah! loss of productivity arrives earlier

    5. Re:Did anyone else notice... by N!k0N · · Score: 1

      fool! your Jedi mind tricks will not work on... who are you? who am I? what just happened?

    6. Re:Did anyone else notice... by NINtendo72 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, what's up with that? Isn't it Revenge of the Sith?

    7. Re:Did anyone else notice... by joeybagadonuts · · Score: 1

      They = /. samzenpus The Post got it right. Not even reading the submissions anymore, nevermind TFAs.

    8. Re:Did anyone else notice... by MadMoses · · Score: 1

      Sith happens.

      --

      Do not be alarmed. This is only a test.
  17. I don't buy it by pyite · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's a flawed analysis. They study implies that these people otherwise wouldn't have these days off. People who get vacation time tend to either take it when they can so as not to lose it, or they accrue it to cash in later. It's as much a part of compensation as actual pay. On the other hand, hourly employees who don't get vacation time are only costing themselves money, so there's no business loss. *Sigh*, more people who think they can model the world with incredibly flawed assumptions.

    --

    "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    1. Re:I don't buy it by bcrowell · · Score: 5, Funny
      Projected economic losses from people cutting work to go to Star Wars III:
      • $628,880,000
      Projected economic losses from rioting if it has Jar Jar in it:
      • $843,111,644.77
      Projected economic losses from decreased self-esteem when people realize they got lured into paying to see this one, too:
      • $948,362,210.03
    2. Re:I don't buy it by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      The don't think they can model the world with incredibly flawed assumptions. They think they can sell papers with important looking numbers generated by whatever flawed assumptions will make them big enough.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    3. Re:I don't buy it by strider44 · · Score: 1

      yeah and I'm taking a sickie from my job at a movie theatre to go Star Wars. Think of the poor cinemas!

    4. Re:I don't buy it by michaeldot · · Score: 1

      I don't buy it either.

      It's like sleep: say you need to get something done in 72 hours. Now, you could attempt to work non-stop 72 hours, or you could take 3 * 8 = 24 hours to leave you 48 hours.

      So it's 72 hours vs 48 hours, a theoretical 33% loss of productivity. But it isn't is it, since the last half of those non-stop 72 hours would have been more or less worthless.

      Human beings need breaks... coffee breaks, water cooler chats, walks in the fresh air, entertainment, sex, sleep, etc. Without them, we're less productive.

      If your life is boring and unstimulated, you're not productive.

    5. Re:I don't buy it by ChefInnocent · · Score: 1

      I would argue that the flawed analysis comes from assuming that the people skipping work average the $130/day. I know very few who would skip and those that are part-time employees making near minimum wage. For Episode II, I knew 1 person who had a non-McJob that took the day off. He asked for the vacation weeks in advance. The way I see it, their analysis is so f*cked up, it's hard to believe the NYT writter and editor aren't flipping burgers.

    6. Re:I don't buy it by biobogonics · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's a flawed analysis. They study implies that these people otherwise wouldn't have these days off.

      Actually it's a stupid story. Why don't they write a story about lost productivity around November 15th - the start of hunting season?

    7. Re:I don't buy it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm somewhat bemused by folks arrogant enough to presume they can predict lost revenues to within 1.5 thousandths of a percent based on the presumed precision of their number based on its non-zero digits.

    8. Re:I don't buy it by l3v1 · · Score: 1

      It's a flawed analysis.

      One more thing I just can't grasp: version 1: in the US all people are working 24/7 so they don't have any non-working hours free to go see a movie; version 2: in the US people deliberately go see a movie during working hours because they enjoy skipping a few hours of work (well, understandable but not very profitable); version 3: nobody has the patience to wait a few hours till work ends and go see a movie afterwards. Or what ?

      --
      I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
    9. Re:I don't buy it by neon_geniuses · · Score: 1
      hourly employees who don't get vacation time are only costing themselves money

      It is not true that hourly employees can skip work one day and "only cost themselves money." Otherwise, they could come in whenever they felt like working and leave when they were satisfied.

      It may be the case that certain tasks don't get done because of an unplanned holiday. However, I think you're mostly right and a serious paper wouldn't print an arbitrary figure like $900 bajillion and expect people to believe it.

    10. Re:I don't buy it by mrcrowbar · · Score: 1
      Seeing Jar Jar die a horrible, painful death:
      • Priceless
    11. Re:I don't buy it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lucas' sinster laugh as people realize we've been fucked again... Priceless.

    12. Re:I don't buy it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      *Sigh*, more people who think they can model the world with incredibly flawed assumptions.

      No you are wrong - it is actually about people who think that they can sell newspapers and get website impressions with incredibly flawed assumptions.

      And it appears that they are correct.

    13. Re:I don't buy it by kabocox · · Score: 1

      It's a flawed analysis. They study implies that these people otherwise wouldn't have these days off.

      Actually it's a stupid story. Why don't they write a story about lost productivity around November 15th - the start of hunting season?


      Because that's a seasonal event usually that the same individuals will always take off on. That can be planned around. Of course, some one could do a study about lost productivity on Holidays in general like Labor Day, Memorial Day, and 4 of July. I don't think that it will effect the economy badly at all. I do think movie sales, merchanise, and fast food tie-ins will be making the money to off set the lost productivity out of other sectors.

    14. Re:I don't buy it by beta64 · · Score: 1

      Projected: The look on George Lucas's face as thousands of angry fans give in to the darkside

      Priceless

      --
      -- Juan
  18. Uh no by 1010011010 · · Score: 1

    I'm just waiting for Lucas to stop murdering the memory of Star Wars.

    That, and Serenity.

    --
    Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    1. Re:Uh no by Roofus · · Score: 1

      No kidding.

      I saw the First Episode because everybody else was going to see it.

      I saw the Second Episode because it was on HBO and I was too lazy to turn the TV off.

      Now, I only get two channels on my TV (FOX and NBC). So I figure I have at least 3 years before I'll have to suffer through Episode 3 =)

      Notice the use of the word 'Episode', it can be used many ways, such as:

      "I had a nasty episode of food poisoning last night, I was shitting and vommiting all night"

      How appropriate for Star Wars =)

  19. Hype it up baby! by MavEtJu · · Score: 1

    With the bad reviews from fans of the previous two movies they need to hype it up to make sure they're coming.

    I just hope that the improvements in the second part of Episode 2 continue in this sequel.

    --
    bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
  20. Thank GOD by LewsTherinKinslayer · · Score: 1

    My last exam was today, so that means I have exactly two weeks of freedom before I start my summer semester. And how perfect is that? A whole weekend to relax, and of course, go see SW:RotS.

    (and please, please, don't suck.)

    Sincerely, a huge original trilogy fan.

    1. Re:Thank GOD by Eccles · · Score: 2, Funny

      (and please, please, don't suck.)

      The funny thing is, most of the time my begging is for exactly the opposite...

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  21. Since when did time off cost anyone anything? by showardkid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The fact is, you don't just magically get time off when a new movie comes out. Someone has to cover for you where you work, or your work doesn't get done. If your work doesn't get done, you get fired. How does this add up to billions in lost funds?

    --
    Do, do not, or delegate to someone else: there is no try.
    1. Re:Since when did time off cost anyone anything? by Baricom · · Score: 1

      Many of the people who are taking time off will be doing so by calling in sick. Workers who call in sick usually get paid. Not only does your company have to pay you for seeing Star Wars, but they also have to pay whoever is covering for you. That means they are paying double for the same amount of work, and possibly less (since your sub probably has his or her own work to do also).

    2. Re:Since when did time off cost anyone anything? by Sancho · · Score: 1

      I think it's got to be slightly incorrect to call it lost funds.

      People who take a day off for any reason tend to do one of things:
      1) Unpaid vacation--the company doesn't pay them, only loss is in productivity. How much does your company make because you're there? (consider that you'll probably have to make the work up, or have someone cover for you).
      2) Paid vacation--The company gave them the option to take days off for whatever their heart desires--no loss of money or productivity that wasn't already built into the system.
      3) Sick day--again, days that are built into the system, but the yearly rollover is likely different, as is the payout after termination. Could be that the company loses money here if they don't give an eventual payout and if the sick day wouldn't have eventually been used.

      The only way a company loses money they wouldn't normally lose from having someone take a day off is if that time isn't built into the system. I don't know of any company for which this is the case.

    3. Re:Since when did time off cost anyone anything? by Peyna · · Score: 1

      But chances are you will be happier when you go to work the next day and be more productive. Whereas if you had skipped the movie and gone to work, you'd be miserable an unproductive.

      I recall a study not too long ago that demonstrated that people who show up to work when sick cost employers more money than people who take the day off when sick, for similar reasons.

      --
      What?
    4. Re:Since when did time off cost anyone anything? by miyako · · Score: 1

      actually, the big thing about showing up sick is that you get other people sick.
      That, and if you show up and work while sick, instead of resting and getting better, you end up sending a month being unproductive because you are sick, instead of a couple of days being unproductive because you are at home getting better.
      Which I guess goes to partially prove your point, making this comment meaningless....oh well.

      --
      Famous Last Words: "hmm...wikipedia says it's edible"
    5. Re:Since when did time off cost anyone anything? by Shadowlore · · Score: 1

      The fact is, you don't just magically get time off when a new movie comes out. Someone has to cover for you where you work, or your work doesn't get done. If your work doesn't get done, you get fired. How does this add up to billions in lost funds?

      That isn't always true. Not all work has to be done today. Many tech places around here take their people to the movies for such days. I understand that here the place was half empty -- managers included -- as they all went to the movie together. In some cases, companies will attempt to rent out the theater. And in some of those cases, they'll succeed.

      No lost work there. Work is not always like time. Sometimes you can put it off.

      --
      My Suburban burns less gasoline than your Prius.
    6. Re:Since when did time off cost anyone anything? by showardkid · · Score: 1

      The places like that are likely not the ones who figure biggest into that number: the losses for work that didn't really need to get done and therefore wasn't done are probably not going to be foremost in the anticipated "sick-out".

      BTW, why bother posting 12 days after the article was released? This topic was dead and gone...

      --
      Do, do not, or delegate to someone else: there is no try.
  22. CONSUME by Cryofan · · Score: 1
    CONSUME


    reference to They Live

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
    1. Re:CONSUME by mlynx · · Score: 1

      That is one of the best pictures I have seen in ages! It's also a fun film to rent, not the best acting in the world, but an interesting story.

  23. Recoverable or not? Accrued for or not? by winkydink · · Score: 1

    If somebody takes PTO for the day they are out, the time and $$$ has already been accounted for.

    If the person makes up for it by working harder or coming in over the weekend, then the lost time is recovered. Lost opportunity is another matter and harder to measure.

    It isn't as simple as adding up all the hours and multiplying by the hourly wage, but then again, I don't think the target demographic of the NY Post is people with MBAs.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

  24. I told my boss.... by Beolach · · Score: 1

    I needed it off to go to my Uncle Obi-Wan's funeral. He didn't catch it at first.

    --
    Join moola.com, play games to earn money.
    1. Re:I told my boss.... by pwnage · · Score: 1

      Perhaps that's because he knows that Obi-Wan doesn't die in this movie!

      --
      Reminder: Apple owns 1/255th of the internet.
    2. Re:I told my boss.... by mesach · · Score: 1

      A more apt excuse would be for the birth of your niece Leia and nephew Luke. Since your "Uncle" Obi-Wan doesnt die in this movie.

      and besides you would probably need more than one day off, Remember...

      A long time ago, In a galaxy FAR, FAR away...

      there is some travel time involved you know.

      --
      moo.
  25. Just call me Skippy by thewiz · · Score: 1

    I plan on being there at the 7 A.M. showing at the theater down the road.

    But, seriously, it's pretty common for people to skip out or come in late to work when there is something they really want to do. A couple of my co-workers recently took a 3-hour lunch to go and play golf. They made up their work hours and got their assigned work done. I've found that most employers don't care if you take a few hours off every once in a while as long as you get your work completed.

    --
    If "disco" means "I learn" in Latin, does "discothèque" mean "I learn technology"?
  26. Re:I'm Not Planning To See It Now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you ready for an anti-Bush diatribe?


    Why, it wouldn't be a slashdot article if one didn't happen.
  27. The devolution of /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would appear that /. has become nothing more than a news aggregator for news aggregators. Over the past week or so, I've read just about every /. article on Fark, NewsForge or TheReg a day or two before they hit /. ZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.....

  28. Responsibility? by RealityMogul · · Score: 1

    I'm not the ideal when it comes to responsibility, but c'mon. What the hell's the point in skipping work for a movie. It's not like some once in a lifetime concert that's only playing one night. This movie will be available on some form of media till long after you die!

    1. Re:Responsibility? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kilo, is that you?

  29. I'm just going to quit by himthatwas · · Score: 1

    That way if it sucks I don't have to face my co-workers with the fact that I left them hanging to go see a movie. In fact I don't expect to see it until it's been out for about two weeks.

  30. Better question by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

    Who will stick to their plans? I planned to go see HHGG the first day.. and I haven't even seen it yet. I probably won't for a week or three.

    Judging by people I know and myself out of every 10 who plan to go first day only 2-3 will make it.

    --
    I like muppets.
  31. but, on the plus side... by Neitokun · · Score: 2, Funny

    all the gamers who don't go will get 20ms pings :D

  32. sick? by reiggin · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's a pathetic excuse. I'm just quitting.

    1. Re:sick? by Phu5ion · · Score: 1
      I'm with you on that I've been looking for a reason to quit for the past 8 months.

      OTOH, I've only been working at this job for the past 8 months, so i guess it all works out.

      Ah fsck it, I'm retiring! I'm 25, and i had a good run. Let society pick up the slack.

      --
      Slashdot is kind of like Playboy; we aren't here to read the articles.
  33. It finally comes together by jaymzter · · Score: 1

    I think I'm finally starting to appreciate the prequels. I think ROTS will reveal the things that seemed dumb in TPM and AOTC to have been part of a large web of deceit.

    I thought it was stupid to have Anakin and Kenobi guard the princess in AOTC, but in light of ROTS it's clear that Padme is about as unsettling on Anakin as Palpatine is. When Anakin kills the village of sandpeople she doesn't take him to task, and actually goads him into disobeying the Jedi counsel in going to Geonosis.
    Finally, it's the fact that she may die in ROTS that pushes Anakin over the edge, after having already lost his mother and blaming the Jedi for it. That girl almost doomed us all.
    Now if only the acting could have been better. *sigh*

    --
    If thou see a fair woman pay court to her, for thus thou wilt obtain love
    1. Re:It finally comes together by keraneuology · · Score: 1

      I ask only two things: 1. PLEASE no Jar Jar in any way, shape, form, memory, echo, allusion, hint, reference, tribute, allegory, or any other apt words. 2. Am I the only person who has notices that George loves to use screen wipes? With every screen wipe I get this image of Homer Simpson saying "and star wipe and we're done". I'm sick of those stupid screen wipes between every scene.

      --
      If the g'vt kept the data on you that google does you'd better believe you'd be calling it "doing evil"
  34. I have no interest in seeing Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but if I can use it as an excuse to go fishing, than all I can say is yeeee harrrr

  35. Because there's nothing important to report on.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We get this gem?

    On top of an airplane scaring preznit spooky-pants' friends?

    Someone felt compelled to write this feature story to take up column inches because there isn't anything more important going on in the world?

    Here's some news: people who don't have health insurance will be forced to pay eleventy zillion dollars for health care this year.

    Oh, look! A white lady ran away from her wedding/drowned her kids/got murdered by her bored husband!

  36. (obligatory) by happymedium · · Score: 1

    I sense a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of employers suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced.

  37. oh no! by rommel99 · · Score: 1

    and i have to goto Manhatten late next week. the queues will be irrational. i hope my client doesn't mind.

    --
    I drink to make you more interesting
  38. Is Jar Jar in this one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That pretty much ended my paying to see Star Wars.

  39. people missing work because of SW? by Arctic+Dragon · · Score: 1

    If they had girlfriends, they'd be pissed at them.

    1. Re:people missing work because of SW? by Kyrene · · Score: 1
      Or boyfriends. :)

      Oh wait, I'm supposed to pretend that only guys like Star Wars, Star Trek, science fiction in general, computers, RPGs, gaming....

      --
      Do not disturb. Already disturbed. http://www.teaaddictedgeek.com
  40. Estimated losses? by NJVil · · Score: 1

    Is this anything like the RIAA giving estimated losses due to copyright infringement? If so, I think we all know it's a bit overstated.

  41. 3 Words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Get a life...

    1. Re:3 Words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7 Words..

      Get that cock out of your mouth.

  42. Re:I'm Not Planning To See It Now by lastninja · · Score: 0

    Well on the other hand you could argue that Episode I, was a very Republican affair with all the union-busting jedis, evil tariffs and such.

    --
    John Carmack fan, browsing at +5 since 1999.
  43. Hmmm sounds awfull... by ShatteredDream · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yeah, right. This is the final installment in the series so it's not like this is going to be one of many "productivity hits" that businesses will have to suffer. You want to bitch about a productivity hit, why not bitch about the dumbasses who cannot follow IT department policy about opening insecure attachments and who do other things like that which open them up to worms? God only knows how much money businesses have lost to such willfully negligent behavior.

  44. Company Pays by chill · · Score: 1

    The company I work for announced a couple of days ago a "Company Workshop" on 5/29, at the local megaplex. And... it is for the whole family. My company employs about 20, and *everyone* is going.

    Fringe benefit to working at an uber-geek company.

    -Charles

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  45. Got annual leave approved... by CoolGopher · · Score: 1

    Since I and some of my friends have tickets to a gold class 12:01 screening, I did the sensible thing and applied for annual leave for the 19th and 20th.

    Got it approved too, despite having the reason field saying "Recovering from Star Wars midnight session" :)

    And if you're wondering "why gold class?", it's simply because we don't trust the movie to be any good. With gold class we'll at least have very comfy seats, snacks brought in to us, and no screaming kids in the cinema (we booked out the entire gold class cinema). So, even if the movie sucks (I hope it doesn't!), it won't be a terrible night.

    1. Re:Got annual leave approved... by tim_uk · · Score: 1

      What kind of fascists do you work for that make you justify an annual leave request with a "reason"?

  46. At 31 Yers Old... by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

    How many of you are planning to skip at least part of your workday on the first two days?

    Well I already have my physical tickets hanging from my 'fridge. I also flat-out told my managers (yes plural... :-\ ) that I will be unavailable that day (May 19th). My Son, my GF, my Mom and, myself have tickets (again, literally hanging on my fridge).

    --
    I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
    I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    1. Re:At 31 Yers Old... by shogun · · Score: 2, Funny

      Where do you live again?.... :)

    2. Re:At 31 Yers Old... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The crazy part is his mom and his GF are one and the same ;)

    3. Re:At 31 Yers Old... by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

      The crazy part is his mom and his GF are one and the same ;)

      HEH!
      That's a pretty damn good come-back, man. Thanx for the giggle! I'm not from Kentucky, though... :-)

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
  47. Skip work? by Chmarr · · Score: 1

    Skip work?! Nah... work's PAYING for the entire engineering team to go watch the movie :)

  48. Re:First Post! by elzurawka · · Score: 0

    well, isnt that awkward?

    --
    -EL
  49. Insane!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was just reading the New York Post about this.

    They are reporting that it will cost employers $628,880,000 in lost productivity on the first two days of Star Wars Episode III!

    1. Re:Insane!!! by Kredal · · Score: 1

      Wow! You should submit that story to Slashdot! I'm sure that's something they'd love to put on the front page! As as far as I know, it wouldn't be a dupe!

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
    2. Re:Insane!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rofl. The grandparent should submit that story to Slashdot!! I'm sure that's something they'd love to put on the front page!!! As far as I know, it wouldn't be a dupe!

  50. My Faith in Speculation is Still Waining... by Jinsaku · · Score: 5, Informative
    From the article:

    The findings are based on the assumption that attendance during the first two days will match that of the last "Star Wars" blockbuster, "Episode II -- Attack of the Clones," which attracted 9.4 million people in in 2002.

    Challenger estimates that 4.8 million of those opening-day attendees are employed at least 35 hours per week. With those full-timers earning an average of $130.60 per day, the two-day cost in terms of lost wages and productivity would be a staggering $626,880,000, he said.

    So, even estimating that their 4.8 million figure is right, they assume that all of these 4.8 million people will skip the entire day to watch a 2 hour movie? Not only do those attendance figures for episode 2 include midnight showings the previous night (I went the the 12:01 and was into work bright and early the next morning), but they don't even realize that probably *half* the showtimes are *after* work hours. I know a lot of people that are catching the Thursday or Friday evening of the show. Granted, there is a hit to production, but it's nowhere *near* the figure they speculate in the article.

    --
    -- Jinsaku
    1. Re:My Faith in Speculation is Still Waining... by CyberBill · · Score: 1

      I agree, so what if half of the people that see the show are employed, there is absolutely no way that they skipped the ENTIRE DAY OF WORK. It really is a shame that figures like that actually make it into print. Its all FLUFF, just complete meaningless crap.

      --
      -Bill
    2. Re:My Faith in Speculation is Still Waining... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "So, even estimating that their 4.8 million figure is right, they assume that all of these 4.8 million people will skip the entire day to watch a 2 hour movie?"

      I'm surprised you even went that far to find fault with the story. There are three ways to take time off work:

      1.) Don't get paid.
      2.) Take a vacation day. Take too many vacation days, don't get paid.
      3.) Take a sick day. Take too many sick days, don't get paid.

      Total actual losses? $0.00.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:My Faith in Speculation is Still Waining... by Eradicator2k3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "...they don't even realize that probably *half* the showtimes are *after* work hours. I know a lot of people that are catching the Thursday or Friday evening of the show. Granted, there is a hit to production, but it's nowhere *near* the figure they speculate in the article."

      Dammit Jinsaku, you make an excellent point. Perhaps the lost productivity is not from people taking time off from work to see it, but instead using their work time to post on Slashdot when they *should* be unclogging that problem crapper in the ladies room.

      Do I have to spell it out to you, Jinsaku? We're experiencing our own "Return of the Shit" (or "Revenge", whatever) in the john. Now take care of it.

      Sincerely,
      Your Boss

      --
      Mr. T pitied this fool on 27 July 1992.
    4. Re:My Faith in Speculation is Still Waining... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TFA isn't talking about salary loss, it's referring to money lost based on employee wages. It stupidly assumes that all workers are paid hourly or used up their vacation time. For my 46.79 Columbian Pesos, let's just take the hype and see the damn movie. (like we won't anyway)

    5. Re:My Faith in Speculation is Still Waining... by Xugumad · · Score: 1

      Also, flexitime anyone? As long as I put in roughly the right number of hours in a day, at work, no-one cares when (which is great, because I tend to find it easier to focus at the silly hours of the morning). If I cared enough about seeing this film, I could simply walk out of my office at 2, come back for 4, and put the two hours in later.

    6. Re:My Faith in Speculation is Still Waining... by (insert+linux+refere · · Score: 1

      Don't want to keep everything too general, here. I know for a fact my Latin professor has not only bought $600 worth of tickets so that he can tape all the tickets on the seats near him for the midnight show and be alone, but that he's also spent another few hundred to go see every showing of the movie for that day and the day after. Needless to say he'll be out. Don't underestimate the power of a SW geek - I bet that though many people won't spend as much as expected, others will spend far more than expected (aka less time working), and it'll get pretty close to the estimate given.

    7. Re:My Faith in Speculation is Still Waining... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you have a cool-enough boss...
      4) The whole department has an "off-site meeting" or "training day"
      nudge nudge wink wink.

  51. The amount is wrong too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Off by $2,000,000.

    Brahmastra, this has to stop now. Either copy-paste your quotes, or stop doing drugs.

  52. Work related by td · · Score: 1

    I work in the movie business, and a whole bunch of us are planning on a "field research" trip, with the company's knowledge. And I get to deduct the cost of my ticket as a business-related expense.

    --
    -Tom Duff
  53. Plan not... by isny · · Score: 1

    Do. Or do not. There is no plan.

  54. Star Wars vs Slashdot by xiando · · Score: 1

    Something tells me more money is lost every day on employees using their time to post on forums and talk about nothing on IRC than what will be lost the first two days of a movie series that is highly overrated, hyped and most importantly, lost it's glory and all my interest after the first (or last, depending on view) three movies.

  55. McDonald's is most distressed by WAR-Ink · · Score: 1

    Aren't Star Wars fans the pencil necks, wearing the fake pointy ears and working the McDonald's drive-thru? Somehow I think the world economy will survive their absense for a day or two...or forever.

  56. Not to be another spoilsport here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Boba Fett didn't die in the sarlac's digestive tract. . . Or do you know that?

    1. Re:Not to be another spoilsport here... by Sledgy · · Score: 1

      Quote from one of the short stories was something along the lines of "The others tried to climb out, I made my own way out."

  57. When is the movie coming out? by hsmith · · Score: 1

    I honestly don't know!

  58. As PT Barnum once said by letchhausen · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    There's one born every minute. It's pretty hilarious that after how utterly terrible the first two movies were that the idiot geekboy have nothing better to do than get suckered by that chump Lucas for a third go round. I bet that ass is laughing all the way to the bank. I know the distibutor is........It's pretty pathetic when people's lives are so small and utterly desire filled that they can't wait to see this and skip work. Not that there's anything wrong with missing work, but this is a pretty lame reason......

    --
    Hey, you think your house is cool?
    1. Re:As PT Barnum once said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's pretty pathetic when people's lives are so small and utterly desire filled that they can't wait to see this and skip work.

      So says teh winnar on Slashdot.

  59. 5 words by llzackll · · Score: 1

    Natalie Portman, naked and petrified.

    1. Re:5 words by mesach · · Score: 1

      6 More for you

      In a bowl of hot grits.

      --
      moo.
  60. It's free for me! by pbaumgar · · Score: 1

    I've been lucky, I've worked at 3 different places when each movie has come out. Each employer has had scheduled outings for all employess to go see it on openining day!

  61. My job is making a trip out of it.. by XaXXon · · Score: 1

    My group at Amazon (while we're not busy coming up with things to patent) is taking a group trip to see it on Friday. I wasn't going to pay to go see it on my own, but now, the price is right.

    Apparently someone here thinks that going to see it, overall, isn't a loss. Furthermore, they think paying for us to go see it isn't a loss.

    Any programmers need a job? I need co-workers.

  62. Re:I'm Not Planning To See It Now by mbrewthx · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Along with an impotent Senate that pawned the hard desision off on the Judiciary.

    --
    __________ Leave me alone I'm compiling a RPG II program on my S/36...Thanks to metamucil I'm a Regular Meta Moderator
  63. I bet most companies will make a profit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Probably most employees particularly Star Wars fans, are not a net contributor to their companies. Likely the big sickout will save these companies money rather than hurt them.

  64. That's crazy man by dtfinch · · Score: 1

    Who would pay $100 to see a movie when they can see it later in the day for $6.75? I suppose it's not as bad as quitting your job to camp out in front of the theater two months in advance.

    1. Re:That's crazy man by mesach · · Score: 1

      Remember that was also the WRONG Theater!

      --
      moo.
  65. Are you shitting me? by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

    The last two films sucked so much donkey dong they'll be lucky if I bother to add the new one to my netflix queue.

    Mark me as a troll if you must, but after the last two anyone who still bothers to camp in line or blow off work to see a new one has a learning curve like Kansas.

    1. Re:Are you shitting me? by Herr_Nightingale · · Score: 1

      I'm seriously reconsidering adding it to my bittorrent queue, much less netflix. If more people re-watched Phantom & CLones they'd forget about this one. It's amazing how optimistic people are, just because of a decent trailer. I thought the Clones trailer was good, but damn... latex Yoda? HELLO, JARJAR anybody?????

  66. Why skip? They're taking US! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So sometimes my company is cool, just to keep us from becoming too disgruntled.

  67. My employer... by antdude · · Score: 1

    ... is giving full-time employees tickets to see it at a local AMC theater (DLP screen!) on purpose because managers know a lot of employees will see it (take time off). Of course, we return to work after the movie. It is called "team building". :)

    Co-workers and I can't complain!

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  68. not me by Geekboy(Wizard) · · Score: 1

    I won't bother seeing it in the theater. if I see it at all, it'll be on hbo, or something. He fucked his chance at my money by sucking ass on EP1 and EP2.

    Yes, George doesn't owe me anything, but I don't owe him anything either.

  69. Why skip work? by espergreen · · Score: 1

    How many of you are planning to skip at least part of your workday on the first two days?"

    I know 4pm tickets are cheaper...but cmon!

  70. Re:I'm Not Planning To See It Now by Kredal · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Don't forget the Neomodian "Nute Gunray", named for Newt and Reagan...

    Nope, no republican ties there!

    --
    Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
  71. They are full of it... by illumin8 · · Score: 1

    Their figures estimate that of all the people seeing Star Wars, approx. half of them are employed full-time. They also assume that those people will take both Thursday and Friday off work, just to see the movie...

    I mean this is Star Wars and all, but how many people with full-time jobs have to take a 4-day weekend just to see a movie? Get real...

    The New York Post has no redeeming qualities, and shouldn't even be considered news. More like "news for idiots, stuff that's overhyped"...

    I consider the New York Post the journalistic equivelant of a good troll... Hey, wait a minute, damn it... now they've got me feeding the troll as well.

    --
    "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
  72. In other news.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trillions of lost each year in productivity because employees take vacation time.. If they would only work 10 hours a day 365 days a year our productivity would be amazing...

    yeah sure

  73. WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I somehow stumbled upon how to make $130 in a single day I wouldn't give it up to watch some silly movie.

    1. Re:WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If I somehow stumbled upon how to make $130 in a single day I wouldn't give it up to watch some silly movie."

      I get the equivalent of $46.00 an hour and still manage to have to "do without" from time to time. I'm still not able to get any equity in my local real estate market, or even find much in the way of lateral moves for employment.

      So I guess it's all relative.

  74. Email? by hazzey · · Score: 1

    And how much time/money can be attributed to email?

    That number should be MUCH higher than that. And everyday also.

  75. I'm gonna be there! by dokhebi · · Score: 1

    Except I'm not calling in sick. I'm taking a day off and I told my bosses why I wil be out of the office. They are both fannish to some extent so they understand...

    Just my $0.02 worth.

  76. Does it count if your company pays? by eWalker · · Score: 1

    My company has bought tickets for our entire staff to go on opening day. Does that count as lost productivity?

  77. Seeing it @ Midnight by nixkuroi · · Score: 1

    It'll cost me some productivity, but only because I'll be half awake the next day.

    Oh wait! Caffeine!

    Nevermind. :)

  78. My employer's handing out tickets by ChipX86 · · Score: 1

    Our company is actually handing out tickets next week to all the employees, and has reserved two theaters. This is for opening day. I love where I work. :)

    1. Re:My employer's handing out tickets by RaymondRuptime · · Score: 1

      That's sweet! My company isn't doing that, but they did let me buy tickets for my entire group to go (on the clock) on opening day, and threw in lunch. Yes, Virginia, there are good places to work!

  79. The New York Post is hardly journalism. by crovira · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'd take anything Rupert Murdoch says with enough salt to ruin my taste buds.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  80. The Darker side by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I sense a disturbance in the labor force. Its as if a million people all called in sick.

    1. Re:The Darker side by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      ...And then bought overpriced theater junkfoods.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    2. Re:The Darker side by Maserati · · Score: 1

      Self-fulfilling prophecy ?

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
    3. Re:The Darker side by Seumas · · Score: 2, Funny

      Next week, every geek will take the day off of work to go see a god damn movie.

      And the very next day, they'll be back to whining about "why are our jobs being outsourced?!".

  81. trade a day, instead of skipping it by sm.arson · · Score: 1

    I asked my supervisor if I could take the day off to see the movie (he started to frown), but then I quickly asked if it was okay if I came in the following saturday to make up for it (he started to smile).

    I get what I want, and he gets what he wants... which mostly because he knows that I can get a lot more done in a day when all of the non-programmers have been evacuated from the building.

    --
    for great justice, this sig has been moved
  82. They are paying us to go! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At the software startup I work for we are all going on opening day during business hours as a group. It's a 'team building' experience :)

  83. so its all bad news for employers? by doktorjayd · · Score: 0

    .. and they have nothing to gain from happy workers skipping a couple of hours, that they'll probably make up again when they get in late?

    why doesnt this get factored in? :)

    1. Re:so its all bad news for employers? by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >.. and they have nothing to gain from happy workers
      > skipping a couple of hours, that they'll probably
      >make up again when they get in late?
      >
      >why doesnt this get factored in? :)

      If the movie's any good, they will spend the rest of the day talking about it. If the movie is not any good, they will spend the rest of the day talking about it.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  84. nourly wage included by future+assassin · · Score: 1
    I didnt RTFA but does this factor in how much the emplayers will save by not having to pay their employees the missed work time?

    http://www.anologger.com/
    Super stealthy blogger or PS2 design ripoff?

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    1. Re:nourly wage included by future+assassin · · Score: 1

      Eh english is my second language, hourly no nourly :P

      --
      by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  85. Assumptions? by Eternally+optimistic · · Score: 1

    No doubt those numbers are based on the assumption that these people have positive productivity while at work. I'm not buying that.

    --
    What keeps me going is my inertia.
  86. Piracy helping the economy? by Cryogenes · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So, when piracy finally makes the production of movies unfeasible, the economy will actually profit! How about that, MPAA?

    1. Re:Piracy helping the economy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ralph Wiggum: "Me fail English? That's unpossible!"

  87. Not revenge, more like a gift by failedlogic · · Score: 1

    To those taking the day off work, it seems to you this will be a "Gift of the Sith". Going to a movie beats going to work anyday (except for the loss of pay).

    1. Re:Not revenge, more like a gift by Beolach · · Score: 1
      (except for the loss of pay)
      Paid Time Off, baby!
      --
      Join moola.com, play games to earn money.
  88. Never thought of that... by Alien+Venom · · Score: 1

    Hey... Call in sick. That's a good idea!

  89. Is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I feel sorry for business. Poor business.

  90. So that would be a 'no'? by Stunning+Tard · · Score: 1

    Yeah, well me either. And even if I did want to see it: calling in sick? Common children, you can't wait a few hours? Your passion has reached fanboy status.

  91. Won't Be Going by electronerdz · · Score: 1

    I won't be watching it. I watched some of the original however many came out many years ago when I was young. But I have not seen any of the new ones. I will stick to my Star Trek.

    --
    Kernel Krunch - Part of a Complete OS
  92. No by ucblockhead · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'll skip work for a movie I know is good. As for this thing...I've been burned twice. I'll let all you guys go the first day. That way, I can find out on slashdot if it is any good, or is yet another Lucasonian fiasco. I can wait until the second weekend. If it's what I think it is, I can wait for the DVD.

    Serenity...I'm skipping work for that.

    --
    The cake is a pie
    1. Re:No by RedWizzard · · Score: 1

      Rottentomatoes has RotS showing 28/30 reveiws positive, and an average rating of 8.1/10. Is that enough evidence of "goodness" for you?

    2. Re:No by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      Isn't serinity a syndicated show on the WB, probably involving some "young" people in incredibly mundane situations? That's what it *sounds* like...

    3. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a big weiner.

    4. Re:No by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      To run out and fight the crowds on opening day? Hah.

      Why should I? The next day, slashdot will be full of comments that let me know exactly how good the movie is.

      If were from a director that was consistent, sure, it might be worth it.

      --
      The cake is a pie
  93. Boycotting Sheep-Marketing by humankind · · Score: 1

    I will not be attending this movie in theatres. I'll borrow the DVD from my nutball SW fans. This is my way of refusing to subsidize the formulaic, sequel-driven, lemming-like marketing plan of the studios, the obnoxious mega-marketing of every star wars-branded dingleberry on the planet, and the generally sorry state of bank-account-moviemaking.

    I understand some people live in this dream star wars universe and have to see it. But I'd urge others to take the time they'd spend on this institutionalized marketing scheme and go see a small, independent movie.

    If the Star Wars franchise were software, it would be another buggy version of Windows.

  94. Official Excuse Note by Silwenae · · Score: 4, Funny

    Download your official Star Wars Excuse Note to give to your employer / school / etc.

    1. Re:Official Excuse Note by mesach · · Score: 1

      There was a time(VERY early on in the development of the company) I aspired to be a member of the Geek Squad...

      but now, I'm almost ashamed to say I know the founder.

      --
      moo.
    2. Re:Official Excuse Note by schmiddy · · Score: 1

      I realize this is all a big joke, but it irks me whenever I hear about illness, movie sequels, or other things "costing businesses X dollars per year".

      Your employer doesn't have a monopoly on your time. We're not costing them $600B by going to see some stupid movie, they're costing us a hundred times that much every day in the taking of our precious time, for a paltry check at the end of the week.

      It's time for businesses to wake up and realize that they have the blessing of an overdedicated, overeducated workforce willing to come in on weekends, on Holidays, at night, whenever, for a few more scraps from the table. The tone of this headline is far too whiney for the humble tone that businesses in this country should have. You shouldn't have to feel guilty about calling in sick when you have a cold, or even just planning to go see some dumb sequel. It's your time out of your life. No one lies on their deathbed wishing they'd spent more time at the office.

      Advice of the day: Figure out something you enjoy doing in your spare time, preferably something more satisfying than taking in ads on Slashdot (maybe riding a bike, playing tennis, spending time with your S.O., hanging out with your friends, playing golf.. you get the idea) -- and just do it more often. And don't feel guilty about it. Life isn't supposed to be as stressful as we make it sometimes. Enjoying yourself is more important than driving up your employer's stock price another quarter point, or brown-nosing your Professor out of a marginally higher grade.

      --
      http://cltracker.net -- powerful craigslist multi-city search
    3. Re:Official Excuse Note by cdf123 · · Score: 1
      One more thing. Beginning at (INSERT APPROXIMATE MAY 19 SCREENING TIME), [NAME] will be unreachable for about two hours, thirteen minutes and eleven seconds. [HE/SHE] will be feeling really bad at this time.

      Wow, does this mean they are showing the first two movies that day too?

  95. "lost" productivity? by deviator · · Score: 1

    most of these will be sick days or personal days, which are already budgeted for - how will this be "lost productivity" if the person was going to eventually take a day off anyhow?

    (granted, most companies probably bank on the idea that you'll never use up your vacation days because you're too fricking busy)

  96. Re:Probably most companies will make a profit by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    "Probably most employees, particularly Star Wars fans, are not a net contributor to their companies. Likely the big sickout will save these companies money rather than hurt them."

    Programmers and VFX artists aren't contributers to their companies?

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  97. Ideas for filming Lactation, milk spray at orgasm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi, I can only speak english, so maybe good for you to get a good translation, but sorry for my lack of Japanese. Excellent milking stuff you offer. The orgasm milk fountain effect is my favorite! I could watch that forever!

    If you can somehow manage to get the Japanese Sky PerfecTV milking contest put on dvd for US distribution, you will make a fortune in the US in sales!

    I have some other friendly suggestions and ideas which you could perhaps forward to some of the milking video producers?

    1. Do your best to find women who have a REALLY explosive milk letdown, I mean milk spraying even with no one squeezing or touching her breasts. Wait until the woman's breasts get really full, so they are hard as rocks. You may have to pay her more for this, as it is painful when they are too full, but it makes for a real show when she sprays! Then get her to have an orgasm, or get her to masturbate to orgasm and see if she sprays like a fountain with no squeezing at all. This will sell well! The milk spraying at orgasm is quite common with women who have full boobs and are nursing.

    With really big milky boobs, this is even more spectacular, as she will have a large milk capacity and be able to spray forever! My wife has done this when her boobs were full of milk, it is incredible and a huge turn-on!

    2. You are aware of Oxytocin, surely, the hormone which initiates the milk spray in women. If you can get some oxytocin nose spray (in the US it is available only with a doctor's prescription), get a woman who is very full of milk to take a dose or two (safely, of course), and watch her spray milk across the room. That would sell great as well.

    3. Maybe have them walk around the room nude a little while they are spraying, doing things, it would be fun.

    4. This is important - when filming the milking videos, it would be best if shot in a room with all black walls (curtains, maybe) and very dark furnishings, with really strong lighting, so that when the milk sprays, it is very easy to see it. In some of the videos, it is hard to see the milk because the backgrounds are too lightly colored, or even white. Try out some different test milkings with various lighting and backgrounds to see what works best. There seems to be no shortage of women eager to milk for the camera! I wish I could be there to help!

    I hope my suggestions have not offended you, and I wish you all the best, and thanks for providing such erotic entertainments!

  98. Dumbass Theater by JungleBoy · · Score: 1

    The dumb theater in my town doesn't do any tickets before-hand. No internet ticket sales, no nothing. You have to buy them the morning of the show. So I'm getting in line Tuesday night so I can get tickets when the box office opens wednesday. Then I'll get right back in line for my seat. Tickets go on sale at 11am, so that's 13 hours just for a seat. Probably another 10-12 hours in line the night befor for tickets.

    But as Tycho said, "no matter how painful, the circle must be complete." Though at least it wasn't as cold as camping out for tickets for LoTR. Sleeping on the sidewalk in Montana in December is Fscking cold.

    --
    "You never know when some crazed rodent with cold feet might be running loose in your pants."
    -Calvin
  99. Why do we measure things with money? by John+Seminal · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I don't get it. Is money God? Is money happiness? Or is money just something the rich dangle to make the poor jump through hoops?? There were societies in the past without money, they hunted, they had music, they danced and laughed. And they lived life on their terms.

    These people who are taking their days off work, they would have taken a day off for something else. They happen to enjoy Star Wars. I am not planning on running to the theater to see it, but I take off time from work every year for baseball games.

    The danger in these kinds of stories is politicians might start thinking "entertainment drains productivity". Lobby groups might decide workers need less overtime protection, to make up those losses.

    If you ask me, money is the least most valuable thing on earth. I'd rather take a hike through a park, or ride a bike.

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    1. Re:Why do we measure things with money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Entertainment == terrorists. but ... RIAA && MPAA == Entertainment. Campaign $$$$ == RIAA && MPAA .. So all politicians are terrorists.

    2. Re:Why do we measure things with money? by cgoody · · Score: 1

      Least most powerful? so does that make it the valuable thing?

    3. Re:Why do we measure things with money? by TheGavster · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You can't ride a bike or hike in those fancy shoes if the people decide to not work the factories anymore. Most people's idea of recreation requires a good deal of industry to be as enjoyable as it is. You work hard to give yourself the ability to take some time off and enjoy the fruits of humanity's labors.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    4. Re:Why do we measure things with money? by Mr.+No+Skills · · Score: 1

      I think, unless someone comes up with easily understood units for "God" or "happiness", money is used because it is a somewhat well understood unit of value.

      I'm not reading too much into the story. Sick and vacation time has value, is missed productivity, and is part of the compensation and planning process in most businesses. Frankly, they probably prefer its eaten up (whether for Star Wars or anything else) because its a liability that is on their books (vacation, anyway, since employees get paid for it when they leave usually).

      I don't think politicians actually "think", either.

      --
      Sleep is for the Weak
    5. Re:Why do we measure things with money? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why do we measure things with money?

      Because money is fungible.

      Is money God?

      Yes, see above. But, God is not fungible so God is not money.

      Is money happiness?

      Yes, see above. But, happiness is not fungible so happiness is not money.

      Or is money just something the rich dangle to make the poor jump through hoops??

      Yes, see above. But, poor jumping through hoops are not fungible, so poor jumping through hoops is not money.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    6. Re:Why do we measure things with money? by wattersa · · Score: 1

      The trifecta of happiness, as it were, in many people's view is money, sex, and power. If you have two of those, it's easy to get the third, I'm told. So if you have sex and power, you don't need money, etc etc. Depending on your priorities, you may disagree but those who are influential seem to agree.

      I'm thinking that people camping out for tickets to star wars have none of these three things. If they did, they would pay someone to get tickets for them or they wouldn't be worried about getting them. I'd like to be in that category.

    7. Re:Why do we measure things with money? by Nurgled · · Score: 1

      I've often thought that it would be better if everyone worked half the hours they currently do and thus twice as many people were in the workforce. Of course, it isn't as simple as that as you'd still get people who want to work full time, and they'd have more money and thus drive up the prices of everything until everyone has to work more hours.

      It's a nice thought, though. It annoys me that most of the people in the western world spend more time working than they do anything else.

    8. Re:Why do we measure things with money? by Ed_1024 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So true.

      The next headline will be:

      "$2.7 Trillion lost in productivity a year by people going home to sleep at night."

    9. Re:Why do we measure things with money? by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      Or is money just something the rich dangle to make the poor jump through hoops?

      Yeah, pretty much. And then they make up some estimate figure about how much money the rich people are loosing because the poor employees actually want to spend a couple dollars of it to see a movie.

      Americans are so bassackwards when it comes to work. If its something you truly enjoy doing, then work until you explode, but for me I do enjoy what I do, but I actually do enjoy other stuff that simply does not pay, or does not pay very much, so I work so I can do these things.

      Now we are "loosing" all this money due to a movie release. Fine. But I've read somewhere where billions and billions of dollars have been "saved" due to switching from rotary dialed phones to push button phones. So I guess that the corporations and businesses are coming out ahead being that phones are used daily and a movie premier like this comes out every couple of years.

      Oh, and my work is going to "loose" a couple of days productivity from me today and tomorrow because I'm going to my cousin's wedding. Next headline will be the productivity lost due to that.

    10. Re:Why do we measure things with money? by huge+colin · · Score: 1

      When you're hiking through a park or riding a bike, you're not earning money, which you need to live. Food, clothing, and shelter aren't free.

      The purpose of money is to reward those that actually care enough to try hard and do a good job at something.

      Modern humans have a ridiculous amount of leisure time compared to our ancestors, so don't try to make it sound like "people are victims of consumerism, man!" That is wrong and stupid. Commercialism and industry are parts of having an advanced society.

    11. Re:Why do we measure things with money? by huge+colin · · Score: 1

      It's a nice thought, though. It annoys me that most of the people in the western world spend more time working than they do anything else.

      People in the western world (or anywhere in the world) spend less time working than they ever have before. Because of technology, people are gaining free time at a pretty good rate.

      And still people complain. Incredible.

    12. Re:Why do we measure things with money? by Danathar · · Score: 1

      Are you a member of the "Church of the Subgenious"?

      http://www.subgenius.com/

      Cause you sound like one of their priests...

    13. Re:Why do we measure things with money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People in the western world (or anywhere in the world) spend less time working than they ever have before. Because of technology, people are gaining free time at a pretty good rate.

      And still people complain. Incredible.


      Yeah - because at least with the current administration, most of that free time is in the form of unemployment.

    14. Re:Why do we measure things with money? by atrizzah · · Score: 1

      That might work...if half of the eligible population weren't already employed. Oh yeah, and if people could live off have the money. I guess it's not such a great idea afterall

    15. Re:Why do we measure things with money? by joss · · Score: 1

      > People in the western world (or anywhere in the world) spend less time working than they ever have before. Because of technology, people are gaining free time at a pretty good rate.

      Bullshit. People [in US anyway] work 10% more hours now than they did in 1975

      http://www.epinet.org/content.cfm/webfeatures_snap shots_07072004

      --
      http://rareformnewmedia.com/
    16. Re:Why do we measure things with money? by joss · · Score: 1

      Every so often you see these headlines: 50m days a year lost
      due to hangovers, $50 billion lost due to [some fun activity]
      bla bla bla. It niggled at me for a long time before I figured
      out just what it was about these headlines that really bothered
      me. Finally I got it. The idiots making these complaints have
      got things the wrong way round. Oscar Wilde nailed it when he said
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes."

      When people moan about how much alcohol or whatever costs the economy,
      the unspoken assumption is that people ought to get up and go to
      work every day for the good of the economy. In this philosophy
      the purpose of humans is to be good little robots, going to work every
      day in order to raise the GNP or increase stockholder value.

      The reason people go to work is to earn the money they need in
      order to live their lives. If what people want to do with their lives
      is get raging drunk or watch starwars then that is their choice.
      For a lot of people, the main reason to go to work is to earn
      enough money to enjoy themselves. Complaining that they sometimes
      miss work as a result of a movie or alcohol related injury is like
      complaining that football players are missing practice due to the match.
      It's easy to blame alcohol/drugs or whatevr for lost work days, but how
      about crediting them as one of the motivations for going to work at all.

      --
      http://rareformnewmedia.com/
    17. Re:Why do we measure things with money? by Deagol · · Score: 1
      You, as most other seem to, miss the point entirely.

      Here's an inspiring excerpt from a book called The Hand-Sculpted House. This particular passage is written by Ianto Evans:

      "I once heard a Chilean named Ana Stern give a speech on 'The Difference Between Peasants and Farmers in Mexico.' Peasants, she said, satisfy their own basic needs: they grow their food, build the houses they live in, often make their own clothes. Most peasants collect medicinal herbs, treat medical emergencies, supply their family with entertainment. They experience fully what they do every day; they have time -- they feel joy. Their culture is integral, it makes sense. Farmers by contrast grow things to sell. With what they earn from their products, they buy their groceries, building materials, clothes, entertainment, and medical insurance. They must also buy into a system which demands that they drive to the market, pay taxes, perhaps send their kids to agricultural college. Increasingly they must buy machinerty, seeds, farm chemicals. Farmers have no time to directly enoy satisfying their own needs, so they purchase their stisfactions; they ready-made clothing and 'convenience' foods."

      The "working for 'The Man'" meme didn't spontaneously arise from nowhere. It's the result of the tragedy of the commons. The greed of a few eventually herds the rest of us along a path that becomes increasingly difficult to deviate from.

      The Western world is one of "farmers". We suffer, I believe, as a society because of this. Our lives bow to the whims of others further up the food chain. I, for one, long for some simpler "peasant" life.

      Don't confuse "progress" with "capitalism". There's no reason the advances of modern living (like the laptop I'm typng on now) could not come about without all of society having to slave the 40-hour work week. Why have all of the advances in technology led to more 40-hour-per-week jobs rather than many more jobs requiring fewer hours? After all, we're experiencing record levels of "worker productivity," if we're to believe the daily labor and market reports.

      The answer is simple: greed & envy. One person wants more than they need (greed). He works more, acquires more. His neighbor gets envious, and does the same. The labor and financial systems in place exploit this to their own advantage (greed -- er, capitalism).

      Is this really a healthy system?

    18. Re:Why do we measure things with money? by Stween · · Score: 1
      I've often thought that it would be better if everyone worked half the hours they currently do and thus twice as many people were in the workforce.

      Likewise, there are some sectors of the workforce where splitting the 7 day week into a 4 day/3 day split would
      • Give people more free time, since they're so good at complaining about how many hours they're working.
      • Open up the possibility of many more jobs, potentially cutting unemployment.
      • Allow more potential flexibility if money's tight (the possibility of taking on a 3 day week somewhere else for additional money).

      Granted, there's a lot of reasons why it'd never really work. I think I came up with the idea off-hand one time when I was working for the Royal Mail. (Seriously early mornings for 6 day weeks gets to anybody after a while.)
    19. Re:Why do we measure things with money? by TheGavster · · Score: 1

      Some countries have tried this. The problem with the math of twice as many workers at half the hours each is that there is a bit of overhead associated with each worker, and doubling that is not a happy thing. Most of the economic problems in many European countries (France, Germany) come from the state mandating 'worker friendly' policies. Make it hard to fire lousy workers? Fine, I'll reduce hiring to mitigate the risk of getting stuck with slackers. 35 hour maximum work week? Well, production is going to have to go down. No way I can afford any more workers.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    20. Re:Why do we measure things with money? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Are you a member of the "Church of the Subgenious"?

      Bob is not fungible.
      But, he may have a fungus infection or two.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    21. Re:Why do we measure things with money? by bujoojoo · · Score: 1

      fungible

      Function: adjective
      Etymology: New Latin fungibilis, from Latin fungi to perform -- more at FUNCTION
      1 : being of such a nature that one part or quantity may be replaced by another equal part or quantity in the satisfaction of an obligation
      2 : INTERCHANGEABLE

      --
      This space for rent
    22. Re:Why do we measure things with money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pronunciation: 'jOk
      Function: noun
      Etymology: Latin jocus; perhaps akin to Old High German gehan to say, Sanskrit yAcati he asks
      1 a : something said or done to provoke laughter; especially : a brief oral narrative with a climactic humorous twist b (1) : the humorous or ridiculous element in something (2) : an instance of jesting : KIDDING
      2 : something not to be taken seriously : a trifling matter

    23. Re:Why do we measure things with money? by huge+colin · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. People [in US anyway] work 10% more hours now than they did in 1975

      Nice try, but:
      - You've offered a single data point for reference over an extremely short time interval (30 years). This is not statistically handy.
      - We're a lot more than 110% as efficient as we were in 1975, so we could work less and get as much done. The standard has settled to 40 hours/week because people are comfortable with this.
      - 10% is a very small difference that could easily be explained by random variance in this data. Compare our lives today to the lives of humans 5,000 years ago when they had to work almost all of the time they were awake, just to stay alive.

    24. Re:Why do we measure things with money? by huge+colin · · Score: 1

      There's no reason the advances of modern living (like the laptop I'm typng on now) could not come about without all of society having to slave the 40-hour work week.

      Are you serious? Do you have any idea how much work and research was required for that laptop to exist?

      Reasearch into petroleum byproducts, injection molding, machining components, magnetic storage, power distribution, batteries, transistor types, semiconductor fabrication, microprocessor design, compiler and assembler development, software development, materials purity tolerances, digital signal processing, fluorescent gas illumination, TFT arrays, lasers, optics and lenses, bus design, peripheral chipset design...

      If you'd be willing to wait a few thousand years for that, then you're right -- 40 hours a week isn't necessary.

      And I don't know what you do for work (if anything), but I sure don't feel like I'm "slaving" here. I like my job, I feel like I'm making a good contribution, and my employer pays me. I then spend this compensation on things that make me happy, because living the simple life of a peasant is possibly the last thing I would want to do now that we've spent thousands of years developing civilization and technology.

      The answer is simple: greed & envy. One person wants more than they need (greed). He works more, acquires more. His neighbor gets envious, and does the same. The labor and financial systems in place exploit this to their own advantage (greed -- er, capitalism).

      People are greedy. Evolution made people greedy because it's good for survival. There's nothing you can do about that. People in capitalist societies are no more greedy than people in communist societies. The difference is that the capitalists actually have some hope of getting the things they want.

    25. Re:Why do we measure things with money? by dragoncortez · · Score: 1
      Compare our lives today to the lives of humans 5,000 years ago when they had to work almost all of the time they were awake, just to stay alive.

      Really? If you're asking for real data from your parent poster, where's your data? You don't think people ever had parties or went to worship services 5,000 years ago?

      --
      Making stupid comments so you don't have to.
    26. Re:Why do we measure things with money? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Or it could be the fact that the line is more like a party. It is a chance for like minded people to get together. I already have tickets, assigned seats and can walk into the theater ahead of the line, but I will still be the 6 hours early just to hang out with the other fans.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    27. Re:Why do we measure things with money? by cttforsale · · Score: 1

      You insensitive clod, I pay for everything with "poor jumping through hoops".

    28. Re:Why do we measure things with money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great post but someone before you, maybe even Oscar Wilde, put it more concisely "I work to live, not live to work." Most people would agree with that statement. However, most executives or or other senior management tend to be the "I live to work, not work to live type." So you can see how they could characterize any activity that doesn't enrich a person, or as often as not themselves through another person, as "waste" or "costs".

    29. Re:Why do we measure things with money? by huge+colin · · Score: 1

      Really? If you're asking for real data from your parent poster, where's your data? You don't think people ever had parties or went to worship services 5,000 years ago?

      The number 5,000 isn't important. I could have said 50,000 or 100,000 years. What's important is that our lives have gotten much easier, which means we have more free time. Modern humans don't have to worry about being gored by a mastodon or dying of old age at 25.

    30. Re:Why do we measure things with money? by dragoncortez · · Score: 1
      Ok, I agree that our lives have become much easier, and we have more spare time than in ages past. However, I have a difficult time believing that there was ever a period in human history when there weren't special days spent doing something besides struggling mightily to ward off death.

      And boy am I way off-topic at this point. Personally, I'm not taking a sick-day to go see Star Wars, I'm not that interested in the film despite all the current hype it's receiving. I do however think that these types of events should be encouraged. To some people this is (sadly) one of the most important events in their lives.

      --
      Making stupid comments so you don't have to.
    31. Re:Why do we measure things with money? by wattersa · · Score: 1

      eh, 6 hours is cool. I remember when Episode 1 came out, there was a line at my local theater over 2 months in advance, and those guys would have failed except for that they had internet access and couches. That's all I'm saying.

    32. Re:Why do we measure things with money? by Nurgled · · Score: 1

      I'm no economist, but shouldn't the market adjust to the constraints? Something should give, such as reduced pay or increased cost of the product.

      I guess, though, that I'm not an economist for a reason.

  100. "loss" of productivity? by EvilStein · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pffft. They're assuming that any of us were productive to begin with. Judging by the sheer volume of posts on Slashdot these days, productivity is a pipe dream.

    I think that firewalling Slashdot would wipe out any financial losses caused by geeks taking time off to see Episode III.

    Then again, we're taking a work sponsored outing to see the movie. heh.

  101. If You Can't Fight Them, Join Them by Comatose51 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My employers decided that it would be smarter to rent out a theater on premiere day for a showing at 4 PM rather than have people skip out. No lines or sleeping in tents for me. It also helps that my company is a hedge fund founded by a bunch of engineering nerds. They want to go as much as we do. It's a win-win situation. Boost morale, prevent "sick" leaves, and satisfy your inner nerd. The company is run by smart people I tell you :-).

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
    1. Re:If You Can't Fight Them, Join Them by ASAPnetworks · · Score: 1

      that's just ridiculous.

      this entire star wars craze is ridiculous. I don't understand why people can't just wait for the lines to calm down and then go see the movie. This whole obsession with seeing it FIRST so you can tell all your geek friends is absurd.

      I doubt half the people willing to skip work even care about the movie, but since star wars is the epitome of geekness the only way to be a "certified geek" and to be cool around your geek colleagues is to pretend you love it.

      stop pretending!@# you and I BOTH know it's just another block buster movie!@#

      --
      in the bonds, ppka
    2. Re:If You Can't Fight Them, Join Them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm. I too work for a hedge fund firm - Amaranth Advisors in greenwich, connecticut. Where is yours located, and what is its name? A hedge fund run by engineers sounds exciting.

  102. What's this "Star Wars" thing? by dheeraj · · Score: 0, Troll

    Hi. Am I the only Slashdot reader and geek* that has never seen a single Star Wars movie, doesn't understand the big deal, and is likely to never see one (mainly because the hype turns me off so much)? And I'm 30, so it's not as if I'm too young or too old.

    Just, you know, wondering.

    ---
    * That could be on shaky ground, since (a) I was into Macs pre-OS X, (b) I have a girlfriend, (c) I'm kind of around my proper weight/height ratio.

    --
    --- Why yes, I am the webmaster of Microsuck.com
    1. Re:What's this "Star Wars" thing? by syberanarchy · · Score: 2, Funny

      AH! I SEE WHAT YOU DID THERE! You capitalized on the whole "Slashdot reader is a fat lonely nerd that lives in the basement" cliche. Boy, you are something else!

    2. Re:What's this "Star Wars" thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screw you douchebag-- i live in the attic.

  103. Hmm, this sounds familiar by Keith+Russell · · Score: 1

    These guys are really good at producing pulled-from-an-uncomfortable-place figures for how much money will be lost because of a weekday event. If you're willing to go through Salon's hoops, you can read King Kaufman ridicule their creative accounting of this years NCAA mens basketball tournament.

    --
    This sig intentionally left blank.
  104. Re:First Post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh my god!
    You responded to me!

    That makes me feel wanted and loved. Maybe i shouldnt kill myself afterall.

  105. None. by Icehouseman · · Score: 0

    My boss doesn't appreciate slacking or skipping out of work to see movies. Therefore, I will probably see it at midnight or the next day after a doctors appointment. Either way, I'm not missing work for this...

  106. For the DINKs by ahollo01 · · Score: 1

    The movie will not change in seven days and you will not have to deal the the kids.

    --
    Sigs are for suckas.
  107. No subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another stupid post

  108. Re:Probably most companies will make a profit by dtfinch · · Score: 1

    I thought we were talking about the holier than thou admins who bring their light sabres to work and spend all day reading slashdot.

  109. projectile vomitting by Darth_Burrito · · Score: 1

    Star Wars Sickout

    I haven't felt this bad since we saw that Ronald Reagan movie.

  110. Does that include... by uvsc_wolverine · · Score: 1

    What about companies that pay for their employees to screen the movie? My dad was working for 3Com when Episode 1 came out and the division he was working for in Utah rented out a theater for all the employees to go see it at no cost to them. They reasoned it was cheaper than having people take off full days to go see it. In fact the division he works in now (at a different company) had a "meeting" at a movie theater that happened to be showing Alien vs. Predator. Then a little while later they had another one involving I, Robot. The person in charge of that division likes movies apparently.

    --
    This space for rent...
  111. Vacation? by Atryn · · Score: 1

    Of course my wife and I will take Thursday off to recover from the midnight showing, but we will both do it with legitimate means. She only works 3 days a week and will arrange her schedule accordingly and I will take earned vacation. So this isn't costing my employer anything. I hope they take that into account in the study...

    --
    Come play Moral Decay!
  112. samzenpus = Timmy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Truth, it is...

  113. BALONEY! by Auxon · · Score: 1

    The flaw in reasoning is obvious: There will not be much, if any, lost revenue, because any clients/customers you will be at the movie too! Duh....

  114. My employer loses $0 by Tiresias_Mons · · Score: 2, Funny

    because I'm normally just browsing the web at work anyways, so the net loss in productivity will be $0

    --
    "But that's just my opinion, I could be wrong" - Dennis Miller
  115. excuses, excuses! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My manager would probably be ok with me skipping out to see Star Wars.

    So, I'm considering playing golf that day and blaming my absence on Star Wars.

  116. Hah! by HaloZero · · Score: 1

    I'm a student. Thankfully, ROTS (no pun intended) premieres smack dab in the middle of my finals week. Lots of free time for movie-going.

    --
    Informatus Technologicus
  117. I CALL DUP!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on.

  118. Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    BTW, even if you single, childless folk are really as productive as you say, if everyone chose your "super productive" lifestyle, it would only last 30-40 years till everyone was too old to work... and no young 'uns to replace you.
    That is called Europe.

    And if you think the Muslim immigrants, that will be a majority in 30-40, years will vote to support the welfare state and pension of the old, white, Christians/atheists that treated the Muslim immigrants as second class citizens, you are nuts. Europe has a nice socialist utopia, but they can only sustain it for 1 generation.

    I would also argue that this drastic decline in birthrates in Europe is due to their nihilist belief system that makes cultural suicide preferable to children.

  119. olololo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Star Wars Episode III {TS} Screener XviD (700 MB)

    Have fun skipping work, lameos!

  120. My whole office in fact: by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 1

    My boss is taking the entire office to see Star Wars. He is footing the bill. And here is the most amazing part. He hates Star Wars. However, he knows everyone in the office is yakking about it, so, he decided to take everyone in the office to see it.

    That's why he is a great guy to work for.

    (shameless plug now):

    SEO Guy

    Just because he is taking us to Star Wars. :)

    --
    Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
    1. Re:My whole office in fact: by Xugumad · · Score: 1

      This is what always amused me about the idea of winning the lottery, and being able to tell your boss just what you think of him.

      "Hey, boss, you're a great guy to work for, although possibly a little firmer leadership would be nice" just doesn't have the right ring to it...

  121. sig figs by Stankatz · · Score: 1

    [...] will cost employers $628,880,000 in lost productivity[...]

    The thing that makes this prediction credible is the presence of 5 significant figures. If it had said $630M, then I would assume they were just pulling it out of their asses. BTW, did you know that 85.327% of all numbers reported in newspapers are completely made up?

  122. Thanks! by Johnny+Mozzarella · · Score: 1

    I'll be in my office sleeping.

  123. sick out by scottmm01 · · Score: 1

    100% of the tech department where i work is coing down with the flu opening day.(so what if there are onlt two techs on staff where i work)

  124. Missing Option... by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

    I'm currently unemployed, so I will have no problem going opening day (at a reasonable hour)

  125. Re:Good feminists get abortions by Stankatz · · Score: 1

    I say you've hit the nail on the head, sir! And furthermore, I'd like to add that no citizen of this great galaxy should be without pancakes. In these trying times of candied beet eating wombats and walruses and whatnot, we need to aid our fellow marshmallows in their quest to reclaim their rightful home on the sun. And Windows is the most stable and secure operating system ever created. Is it time for my medicine again, nurse?

  126. The Flip Side by Mazem · · Score: 1
    If you take any random disturbance to daily activities and multiply it times millions and millions of people, you are going to get a staggering number. However, what those calculations fail to take into account are secondary, tertiary, etc effects on the economy. TFA even points this out:
    "It will result in increased spending on movie tickets and refreshments, increased foreign and domestic tourism, and increased business in shops near the theaters," Challenger said.

  127. I actually was sick for Ep 2 by angle_slam · · Score: 1
    I missed work the day Ep 2 came out because I was sick. Thing is, I really was sick: I had about a 101 degree fever and couldn't eat. But I still saw the movie.

    My wife is sick now, so I wonder if I will "really" be sick next Thursday.

    1. Re:I actually was sick for Ep 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was sick on opening night of Return of the King. I watched it anyway, running a fever.

      Turned out it was influenza. I was very sick for 5 days, and weak for another two weeks after that.

      Read ROTK while I was ill to find out what I'd missed (it was obvious from the movie that they'd left some important bits out--like the planting of the white tree).

      Then I tried to read Fellowship, but found out that Fellowship and a high grade fever don't mix very well ...

  128. The solution is obvious by Fractal+Dice · · Score: 1

    So if any company believes that the number is accurate, the solution is obvious: arrange a free screening for all your employees outside of normal working hours.

    Oh wait ... let's just check who paid for this "study" first?

  129. so the logical conclusion... by khallow · · Score: 1
    I guess then for the sake of the national economy we must ban popular movies that will tempt people to be unproductive. In a similar fashion, when I spend an hour doing something, say like sleeping, then that's an hour that I could have been working and been productive.

    I think that this study vastly overestimated the effect, second that they ignore that any time away from the office isn't necessarily a total waste to the office, someone can cover for this short period of time and the employee can make up the time off. There's a burst of economic activity associated with this movie spending that benefits ultimately the businesses that are supposedly taking a hit. Finally, it may be that leisure activities like watching movies makes people more productive in the long run.

  130. Its on a Saturday you twit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What self respecting person works on a Saturday, it opens on a Saturday. IM looking at the gd ticket preorder i got. lol

    The poster needs shot in the foot

    1. Re:Its on a Saturday you twit by Nakamiya · · Score: 1

      I don't know what calendar you're looking at, but on mine, it opens on a Thursday.

    2. Re:Its on a Saturday you twit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Listen to the commercials, dumbass. "Opens THURSDAY, May 19". Unless you're using some kind of jedi mind-reading tricks that I don't know about for an early screening, my guess is that you wasted money preordering a ticket for the 3rd day of the showing. Good work.

  131. Not me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Honestly some people have to get their priorities straight. It's just a movie. They aren't going to take it away if you don't see it during the first 24 hours of release.

  132. Aftermath by raisedbyrobots · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure I'm going to be sick at least 2 days _after_ I see it.

  133. I'm turning it into a benefit for my employees. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    We're all going together and I'm buying the tix and popcorn. They are going to go anyway.. this avoids the guilt, turns it into a 'perk', improves morale and turns the loss of productivity into a tax deductible expense (possibly).. plus when we're standing in line we'll be intermixing Star Wars Talk with work talk.... To warm up, I'm showing Ep's 1,2,4-6 in the conference room next week (We're going in 'original order' 4-6,1,2...)

    I recommend more businesses do this. But please not at the early afternoon show of the 19th at the Shoreline Cinemas... mmkay?

    1. Re:I'm turning it into a benefit for my employees. by Ph33r+th3+g(O)at · · Score: 1

      That is an excellent idea!

      --
      I too have felt the cold finger of injustice.
  134. Re:Good feminists get abortions by Lord+Kano · · Score: 2, Funny

    Good feminists get abortions? The world would be a better place if their mother's had.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  135. Man, you're no fun! by TheLittleJetson · · Score: 1

    Except people like me, of course, who wouldn't see star wars if my company paid me to take the day off and watch it.

    (Almost) everyone you hate from episodes 1 and 2 will die in this one! You've heard the reviews. BLOOD BATH.

  136. 98% of all statistics are made up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    These kinds of statistics annoy the hell out of me, brought to you by the same folks who count the billions lost every nanosecond by people stealing music on P2P services and the insurmountable costs brought about by the latest Outlook worm. The simple truth is that there isn't a supercomputer in the world that can accurately predict what the costs and benefits are from these each of these events. Does the RIAA take into account how much free advertising is dished out when people sample music for free? No. Can anyone say how much is actually saved when an annoying but otherwise non-desctructive worm infects millions of computers exposing vulnerabilities that two weeks later would have been used to exploit billions in identity theft? No. Same goes for Star Wars. How many people will be going to the movies with work people? Will this be team bonding perhaps? Your company just saved $2000 per person by sending them to the movies instead of corporate teamwork bootcamp.

    For the record, I am not going to ditch work to see the Episode 3. Do you think the statisticians will factor in how much I am costing my employer by standing around the office bitching that I am working instead of having fun?

  137. return of the sith? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I'll be calling in for revenge of the sith...

    1. Re:return of the sith? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's "shit", not "sith". It refers to the acting ability of Hayden Christensen.

    2. Re:Return of the Sith? by pl1ght · · Score: 0

      Reposts/spelling errors/erroneous stories/bad editing is becoming very common here lately for some reason. Must be the choice of submittors as of late. Sad.

  138. nah..i'm just gunna download it off usenet by Hohlraum · · Score: 1

    I KEEEEEEEED :)

    If the first two weren't so god f**king aweful I would have maybe been a bit excited. I'll probably just wait a week or two to go see it. Hayden Christensen couldn't act and George Lucas couldn't write/direct/produce their way out of a nut sack.

  139. I will be by MattinTibet · · Score: 1

    I'm not seeing it till 7:45, but I figure I'll skip some work just on principle.

  140. That is such a bunch of horseshit by fhwghads · · Score: 1

    This figure is completely made up by people without a fucking clue. Not even worth worrying about it.

    --
    Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!
  141. Re:Good feminists get abortions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or if yours had.

  142. Argh... by dethl · · Score: 1

    I'm working at a movie theater showing SW3:ROTS you insensitive clod!

    --
    "Some fight for law. Some fight for justice. What will you fight for? One day, you will see."
  143. Slashdot by TheScorpion420 · · Score: 1

    I wonder what kind of dollar amount slashdot accures in reduced productivity? Seriously, how many people read /. daily if not excessively. Hmm it boggles the mind could make this figure look like chump change.

    --
    If you pay your taxes you support terrorism!
    1. Re:Slashdot by Scyber · · Score: 1

      I was gonna post the exact same thing. I would be curious how much produttivity is lost just by posting this story about lost productivity.

  144. That will be offset by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    That will be offset by the $628 million dorks will spend on Star Wars memoribilia during the same two days.

    Bet you my lightsaber's bigger than yours...

  145. In addition... by fallendove · · Score: 0

    Reviewers have claimed that RotS will cost Star Wars fans approximately 628,880,000 lost childhood memories.

  146. Tourism? by notAyank · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "It will result in increased spending on movie tickets and refreshments, increased foreign and domestic tourism, and increased business in shops near the theaters,"

    What's the justification for an increase in tourism?

  147. Projected figures... by bscott · · Score: 1

    $628,880,000 exactly? Clearly these experts have somehow obtained data from an orifice more commonly associated with waste elimination, and produced an authoritative result for national publication. Didn't any of these people learn about significant digits??

    "Next week, a doctor with a flashlight will show us where sales projections come from..." - Dogbert

    --
    Perfectly Normal Industries
  148. Amazingly enough by Altus · · Score: 1


    The president of my company has decided that the release of Star Wars an event worthy of a company outing. They are taking most of the company out for an afternoon showing on the 19th.

    Its pretty cool really...

    --

    "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

  149. More statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to my sources, it cost $674,340,000 to write this story and the time spent reading it will make 874,841,851,138 people wonder where their five minutes went. This will result in 345,849 slashdotters demanding to know how many more of these numerically unverifiable stories we'll have to put up with. (the answer is 324,081,806,410)

  150. Already on vacations. by Afro+Thunder · · Score: 1

    Forced by E3, Revenge of the Sith and some Europe soccer finals. :)

  151. Filling gap by Sithgunner · · Score: 1

    It would just fill some gap, when people start working enthusiastically after watching the positively reviewed sequel to the decade lasted episodes.

    Use 4 hours to go watch it, maybe people can catch up, think of something interesting in the job etc, when they come back to their jobs next day.

    Some positive thinking...

  152. I'll buy the DVD in China... this weekend...for $1 by Cleetus+Freem · · Score: 1

    Since I'm going to be in Shanghai next week I will just pick up a copy of the DVD as it's probably been out for a few weeks now..lol. I saw Shrek2 for sale there at least a month BEFORE the movie even opened in the U.S. It cost about $1.25 and was not some crap screen grab, rather it was just as good as any legal DVD. I was stunned and couldn't figure out how the heck they got a perfect copy before anything was released! I mean, after the DVD is out sure... but before the movie even hit the screens? Sheesh! I saw something on CNN about it later but I remember it was available a month or more before CNN was claiming it had been seen on the streets. Someone has some serious connections and/or deeeep pockets.

  153. before or after... by subl33t · · Score: 1

    That's odd, I thought the sickness usually set in -after- they saw the movie...

  154. bull fuckin shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I drink, I use drugs, and I stay up late. And I also work long fucking hours that married people can't work because they're trying not to get divorced, or cause they have kids and sports games, or whatever lame bullshit excuses they give.

    Great, you gotta feed your kids. Society is set up to suck your dicks all the fucking time, though; from preferred parking at supermarkets (we have "family parking" around here), to paternity leave, to the little breaks that child bearing people get. Us singles just have to work.

    Fuck you.

  155. How about the Benefit to Society? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The assumption is that Star Wars will only cost society because people are taking a sick day. Has anyone thought that, just maybe, Star Wars contributes value to society? You ask, "How?".

    Well, here's how. Star Wars IV taught good values. Star Wars VI taught that good can triumph over evil and that people are stronger when they do not give into hate. Star Wars' moral values are so close to Tibetan Buddhism that one wonders whether the correspondence is a mere coincidence.

    "Right again, you are. Together defeat China, we will. At hand is the day of liberation for Tibet!" exclaims Yoda.

  156. I just fired a single guy just like that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  157. Re:Probably most companies will make a profit by QuaZar666 · · Score: 1

    that all depends. If the company is a software company then yes Programmers are contributers, but if the programs work on apps for IT then no they do not contribute anything ,except for making things work. in fact IT is always considered as non contributers , and spend lots of money for the company (new systems, software licensing, etc). In fact most of the VPs at the company I work for think we have too many people working in IT, and if they saw our job they might understand a little something.

  158. It's not exactly likely for me by macdaddy · · Score: 1

    Let me just say that I have yet to see Episode II. It was about a year and half after Episode I came out that I bothered to see it. The only reason I did was because a couple coworkers and myself happened to be bored at work and skipped out; we had to find something to do or go back to work. I figure it will be sometime in late 2008 before I see Episode III. Let me know if I miss anything....

  159. Should be good if you use accrued vacation by Dastardly · · Score: 1

    But, using up accrued vacation or sick time should actually help earnings.

    1. Re:Should be good if you use accrued vacation by hubie · · Score: 1
      I would think it is the other way around since vacation/sick time is an indirect expense, meaning that it is something that you cannot apply a fee to (and thus earn a profit from). In fact, it sort of a double loss because when you are taking that time, not only are you being paid out of overhead, but you are also not spending that time charging a customer or otherwise advancing the company bottom line as you normally would.

      I know from a bean counter point of view that companies want people who accrue too much time to use it, but that is because it becomes an accounting headache carrying that potential expense around and not knowing when it might be used in a big lump (it is hard to develop a spending plan if you expect that for a certain month you'll need to spend X dollars out of overhead when there are people who could potentially end up taking that whole month off because of so much accrued time).

  160. Earth to Star Wars fans; come in please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful



    The movie will be shown for more than one fucking day!

    The world won't end if you don't see it for a week, a month, or even a year after it opens.

    Good God, people! Get a life!

    1. Re:Earth to Star Wars fans; come in please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We must watch it! I am camping out in front of the local theator for 12 hours on May 18th to watch the midnight showing.

  161. Re:Probably most companies will make a profit by Random832 · · Score: 1

    and "making things work" isn't a contribution? how much money do they make when stuff isn't working?

    --
    We've secretly replaced Slashdot with new Folgers Crystals - let's see if it notices.
  162. I think you are confusing age and marital status by wasted · · Score: 1

    I have noticed the same thing that you have, (married generally more productive than single,) but when I look at age instead of marital status, I notice the older folks are generally married, and the younger folks are less likely to be married.

    If I look at it as an age issue rather than a marital status issue, I get a better correlation, (older more productive at a given job than younger,) with young married folks being the least productive. Young singles tend to have the greatest deviation (occasionally the most productive, but also occasionally the least productive,) but on average rate better than young married folks.

    The above observations are just my personal experience, and others may have a broader database to analyze.

  163. Cost to business? WTF?! by Malc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why does it always come back to the costs to business? When did they become more important to people? How about the costs to individuals caused by businesses (e.g. days cut from life-span due to job-related stress)? There's more to life than big business.

  164. is it that important? by Exstatica · · Score: 1

    i don't really understand why people get so obsessed with movies. yeah i want to see it, but i don't want to fight the crowds, the packed theaters, and the lines. i can wait a week or two. Money..... crowds....money....crowds... i'll take money.

  165. Thanks for inspiring me.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to arrive to work one hour early and to stay late!!!

    But I'll certainly rent the video when it comes out. Love that Jar Jar.

  166. Same here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's actually good for productivity and hiring.

    I generally take my team to 3-4 1st runs a year. People interviewing bring up that they've heard I do that, so I know it's considered a decent perk.

    It's always during office hours so that they can see the movie and then take off for the rest of the day...

  167. What about us? by bananahead · · Score: 1
    So, I just HAVE to ask...

    How much is Slashdot costing the Universe every second in lost 'productivity'? When I am typing this stuff, I am not moving the lever that moves the arm that picks up the bumper and bolts it onto the back of the car.

    I am willing to bet it is WAY more that that stupid movie...

    --
    A most overlooked advantage to owning a computer is if they foul up there's no law against wacking them around a bit.
  168. What a load of crap! by hawkeye · · Score: 1

    I would estimate that I'm only "productive" 2-3 days every week.

    The rest of the time I spend answering others questions and helping to solve problems caused by poor architecture choices. (not my choices, of course!)

    So.... what the hell difference would a few hours of fun make? No more than a 2-3 hour "lunch break" :-)

    Cheers,

    - hawkeye

    --
    "...The smart and lazy ones I make my commanders." - Erwin Rommel
  169. Short and sweet by SphericalCrusher · · Score: 1

    I'm off. w00t. Going to be attending the 12:00 showing and then going to school the next morning. Good thing I work in a coffee shop -- Expresso!

    --
    "Instant gratification takes too long." - Carrie Fisher
    1. Re:Short and sweet by fgb · · Score: 1

      You work in a coffee shop and you don't know how to spell Espresso?

    2. Re:Short and sweet by SphericalCrusher · · Score: 1

      Oh my God... look at Mr. Smarty pants! Yeah... I was doing that for a reason. It's just how we write it -- normally xpresso on the cup and so on so forth. I had a feeling that when I saw the e-mail that someone commented on my post, it would be some ignorant flamebate dumbass. I guess I was right, hah.

      --
      "Instant gratification takes too long." - Carrie Fisher
    3. Re:Short and sweet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In summary, yes, neither you nor your coworkers know "expresso" and "xpresso" are both wrong.

    4. Re:Short and sweet by SphericalCrusher · · Score: 1

      And in summary, you don't get the point. When we have a large amount of customers coming, we are not going to write down the exact drink name on the cup before passing it down on the bar. That's why you shorten it so you can ring the customer up quicker and take the next order. Other examples - wtchlmc for White Chocolate Mocha, etc.

      --
      "Instant gratification takes too long." - Carrie Fisher
    5. Re:Short and sweet by fgb · · Score: 1

      It just struck me as funny... guess I gotta work on my sense of hoomor.

  170. At this point... by LeoHat · · Score: 1

    ... the movie could be 2.5 hours of G. Lucus' hairy butt and fanboy's will still flock to see it.

    --
    The mistakes of a clever man are equal to the mistakes of a thousand fools.
  171. Our CTO made it official by RZG · · Score: 1

    He bought tickets for the entire IT team, and it is an official company outing.

  172. Poor Little Employers! by tedrlord · · Score: 1

    I am so sick of seeing these reports of estimated corporate losses due to something or another. Star Wars will cost employers six hundred million? Those poor employers, having to deal with outside phenomena ruining their all-important productivity. They often talk about how many kajillion dollars chatting online or surfing the web costs employers annually, or people selfishly getting influenza or SARS.

    Why stop there? Just think about how much money it's costing employers when people take a half hour for lunch every day, or all that lost work when they have to go to the bathroom. Then there's the financial burden companies have to deal with because employees waste time talking to each other. Jesus, what about that time they spend at home, sleeping? It's a terrible blight upon the face or corporate America.

    I think the solution is obvious. All we need to do is get rid of all paid time off, any breaks, carefully monitor all computer access, drug them up with amphetamines, and implant a device that electrically shocks them any time they say something unnecessary or deviate from their appointed tasks in any way. Only then will we stop hemorrhaging money like this.

    --
    [insert witty quote here]
  173. slashdotters, land of the lemmings by greggman · · Score: 1

    I find it funny and sad the a bunch of geeks who all think they are smarter than your average non-geek are to stupid to NOT see the train wreck that Episode 3 is guaranteed to be :-(

    1. Re:slashdotters, land of the lemmings by dvicci · · Score: 3, Funny

      That should be "too stupid to NOT see"...

      --
      ] D
  174. Re:Probably most companies will make a profit by TheOldFart · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't worry too much if I'm called a non "contributer". I guess that might mean someone making things "contrived"? Who knows...

  175. Statistics?!?! by dextroz · · Score: 0

    ...from the fucked up Department of Made-up Statistics-pulled-straight-out-of-my-Ass

    --
    Where's my free iPod!? Until then, I'll settle for a kiss...
  176. Dood by Craig_P92669 · · Score: 0

    Hate to tell you this, Gigle was my last "excuse" to skip work. Ok, so it was the hangover Sunday.....Monday....what's today?

    --
    http://xs4.xs.to/pics/04481/p556222.gif
  177. drones by Robocoastie · · Score: 1

    and if we were truly drones (or in a socialist society) then this so called "lost productivity" would matter. But we aren't, we go to work to provide for the enjoyment and needs of OUR lives NOT the collective.

    1. Re:drones by bhima · · Score: 1

      WTF!? Please explain how not working when you ought to be somehow matters more if you live in a socialist society as opposed to whatever the US has become of late.

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
  178. double standard by gad_zuki! · · Score: 4, Funny

    Or religious holidays. Or the first "beach day" of summer. Or when Lynard Skynard/Rolling Stones comes to town and all the baby boomers try to squeeze into blue jeans they bought 25 years ago. Or hang-over day after cinco de mayo. Or April 20th.

    Oh wait, the double standard.

    Picking on geeks is easy. Picking on religion, the boomers who run business, and minorities isn't. Its like the New York Post is high school all over again.

    1. Re:double standard by fritz1968 · · Score: 1

      Or religious holidays. OK, I understand this one.
      Or the first "beach day" of summer. This one too.
      Or when Lynard Skynard/Rolling Stones comes to town... or any other band for that matter.
      Or hang-over day after cinco de mayo. You're preaching to the choir.
      Or April 20th. ???? OK, you lost me here. What is so special about April 20?

      --
      It is not the strongest of the species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.
    2. Re:double standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    3. Re:double standard by jjr1 · · Score: 1

      How about someone come up with a figure for the loss of productivity when no one in Kansas knows what evolution is.

      --
      Best Trivia answer ever... Name the largest aquatic man eater... Contestant: Tsunami
  179. Re:Probably most companies will make a profit by kbielefe · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's okay. Most of the IT staff at the company I work for think there are too many managers and executives.

    --
    This space intentionally left blank.
  180. My employer is footing the bill by MrSnivvel · · Score: 1

    My employer is not only footing the bill for me to see it, they're also renting out the theatre for that morning to see it. Though to be fair it's just my department, ~40 people. It was voted on for the department fun event for this quarter by us. So you could technically say my department will be some of the first in the country to see it.


    Ha Ha, Neener Neener

    :-P
  181. Midnight showing... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    I'm planning to see a midnight showing. Now if I can get to work in the morning is a different story. Oh, wait a minute, I don't have a job. But why am I seeing a midnight showing? I know! I didn't use the fork!

    1. Re:Midnight showing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow ur fat

    2. Re:Midnight showing... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      wow u noticed

  182. Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't know that it cost parents $628,880,000 in allowance for all those kids to wash the dishes and pick up after the dog for two days!!!

  183. You work to live, you don't live to work. by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm also 22, and work twice as many hours a week...

    Call me when you're done working 80 hour weeks for 3 years and we'll talk


    I think most of us have been there, including Motherfucker. If you're not careful, you're going to burn out before you're 30. These are your prime years. Use them wisely.

    And don't fool yourself, working 80 hours a week is NOT twice as productive as working 40 hours a week. Not even close.

    Look when you're older and have kids, you have a good idea of what's important. Get the shit done in 8 hours. Go home and spend time doing the stuff that really matters. Anything else is probably a waste of your life.

    The other guy has more experience, and figured out how to get the job done in a shorter amount of time.

    1. Re:You work to live, you don't live to work. by Kharny · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed, totally.

      I saw some statistics recently of averages by country in amount of time worked and the relative productivity. The conclusion of the report was that the best productivity is reached when people work 32-38 hours per week and worst productivity was 50 or more hours per week. Without rest and relaxation, your productivity drops, even in a 40 hour 9-5 week, see how much gets done on fridays.....

      --
      Make a man a fire and he will be warm for a day, set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life
    2. Re:You work to live, you don't live to work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i put in 60-70+ hrs a week or more taking over for two full timers and three part timers we've lost over the last four years, in addition to my own duties. about once every two weeks i actually take a lunch break. the only time i've taken off in almost five years is four days with the flu a couple years ago (first sick time taken in over 12 years), no vacation at all, nor does my employer even acknowledge that i have accumulated any. one of the other two full timers ain't worth his weight in donkey dung, so i do (or fix) his work too. only recently did one new full timer get hired, but he only does about half the work of one of the lost full timers.

      i do the work of several people, in addition to my own. it's done better and faster than when we were fully staffed, yet i have received nothing but a 'raise' that resulted in a twenty percent paycut in the last three years. (due to reduction in company paid benefits and an inadequate increase in pay to cover my costs to keep them).

      i am also illegally not being paid overtime. i am the lowest paid employee besides. if it wasn't for the total lack of available jobs around here i would bitch and moan all the way to the state capitol, but i kinda need food and a roof over my head. my 'emergency fund' is all dried up, so i cannot even afford to move elsewhere for decent working conditions. the illegals working the farms around here get better treatment than i do.

      my 3.5 minute breaks every 90 minutes are what keeps my sanity and avoids a messy remake of certain "incidents" at post offices in the 90's. if i drank, perhaps the little pub 100 yards out our back door would be more appealing, they open at 8am for shift workers.

      i get more work done at home after-hours when i can chain smoke while pounding away on a console than i do at the work.

    3. Re:You work to live, you don't live to work. by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      And don't fool yourself, working 80 hours a week is NOT twice as productive as working 40 hours a week. Not even close.

      The trick here is knowing what matters more in your particular situation... Being productive, or looking productive.

    4. Re:You work to live, you don't live to work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude man, you really need to get out of there before you burn out and/or go postal. Your schedule simply is not sustainable.

      If anything, your main goal should be to get the hell out of your situation, as fast as possible.

    5. Re:You work to live, you don't live to work. by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      Your situation sounds unreal, so I'm not sure if you are trolling or not.

      This your situation is true you need to quit, or else you are going to die. Seriously-- you're going to get really sick, and while you are laying in your deathbed you are going to be thinking of all those miserable hours you wasted working for some stupid company. That is a very bad way to die.

      Find another line of work if you have to. You'd probably be happier working at Starbucks, and you'd get promoted faster.

      There are jobs out there. Doesn't sound like you're in the US, but there are many jobs in places like Seattle, San Francisco, New York, Atlanta, etc.

    6. Re:You work to live, you don't live to work. by jjr1 · · Score: 1

      I agree, life is way to short to get hung up spending all that time working. The best work I do is when I'm fresh and creative. I'd say I get half as much done every hour working after 10. Also, it's important to have priorities. 10 years from now do you really think those extra hours are going to make even a small difference in where you are in life? Jobs have no loyalty to you; don't think for a second that anything you do for them will bring you any loyalty when they're looking for someone to lay off. Everyone is replaceable.

      It's pretty shallow to concentrate solely on one thing like work. Why not pick up an instrument, read a book or play a sport?

      --
      Best Trivia answer ever... Name the largest aquatic man eater... Contestant: Tsunami
  184. Load of Crap by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

    What an absolute load of crap. This "lost productivity" number is about as real as the RIAA's estimates of lost sales due to piracy. They even admit that they're making a guess based on an estimate, i.e. pulling numbers out of their ass. The main assumption among them is that you can somehow say this time away from work would have been productive had they stayed at work. When calculating "lost time" you have to first calculate what you had to lose in the first place. 99% of people spend at least half their day reading email, posting to slashdot, daydreaming about Natalie Portman + hot grits, or any one of the standard types of shirking, slacking, or goldbricking. Time = T * .5 then. Of the time spent doing work, 25% of it is spent covering up your previous mistakes, fixing the mistakes that can't be covered up, or shifting blame for mistakes that can't be covered up or fixed. Time = T * .5 * .25 then. The remaining work being done is generally fifty percent bureaucratic nonsense, redundant/doomed projects, or make-work foolishness designed to make your boss look good to his boss. Time = T * .5 * .25 * .5 then. Of the small remaining amount of "productivity", fully 85% of it is being done in departments with names like "marketing", "human resources", or "accounting". These people don't actually produce anything. In fact, they're a millstone around the others' necks. But let's give them the benefit of the doubt and just call them simply "unproductive", rather than "anti-productive". Time = T * .5 * .25 * .5 * .25 = .009375 then. That's right. For every hundred lightsaber fetishizing nerds who skipped work standing in line that first day, less than one of them actually counts as lost productivity.

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  185. Re:Cost to business? WTF?! by Cyno · · Score: 1

    That doesn't cost anything. What are you talking about? People are cheap!

  186. that's ok, they'll make it back the next day. by v3xt0r · · Score: 0

    who cares

    --
    the only permanence in existence, is the impermanence of existence.
  187. Whitebox Enterprise Linux by wbel_pimp2 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Buy these domains so I can go see star wars. My wife said I can't go otherwise. eems the egotistical owner of the whiteboxlinux.net and whiteboxlinux.com domains has decided to offer them on ebay as a peace offering between wbel and himself.

    This is really great news so lets hope someone with WBEL enthusiasm steps up to build a respectable community site.

  188. Grow up by bitznbytz · · Score: 0

    "How many of you are planning to skip at least part of your workday on the first two days?"

    What, are you friggin' ten years old? Go see it on your own goddamn time, monkey.

  189. work? by o0m · · Score: 1

    Humm...I should try that...na SW3

  190. At least it's better than the first two! by antic · · Score: 4, Funny


    At least this is going to be better than the first two. They were so bad that I had to take the *next* day off sick just to recover.

    --
    'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
  191. Definitely not right-wing. by raehl · · Score: 1

    To refresh:

    Right-Wing Profit Mongering Conspiracies are perpetuated by:
    - Gun companies
    - Tobacco Companies
    - Insurance Companies
    - Medical Associations
    - Farming Lobby
    - Energy Companies
    - Timber Companies

    Left-Wing Profit Mongering Conspiracies are perpetuated by:
    - Gun Litigation Trial Lawyers
    - Tobacco Litigation Trial Lawyers
    - Medical Litigation Trial Lawyers (x2)
    - Labor Unions
    - Ok, so, environmentalists don't profit monger, so I guess they're up two here...

    And in this case, Hollywood and Media Companies, so back to even.

    This is clearly left-wing profit mongering, even if Fox is in the business of pandering to rednecks.

  192. Company Field Trip! by Bakafish · · Score: 1

    My 1000 employee silicon valley company is taking the whole crew to opening day. They reserved a theatre and two showings in the afternoon. I guess the bubble still exists for some of the luck few.

  193. Yeah, and those parents are picking up your slack by tod_miller · · Score: 1

    On being productive in futhering society, those kids are gonna pay your security benefits!

    Anyway: SMOKERS!

    Lost productivity, maybe less so in the US now, I am not sure, but at one German office they got away with MURDER!!!

    That is right, the cold blooded, Mr Smoker, in the hall, with the marlboro, type murder.

    "I'm going home to sleep with my wife!"

    (Gotta LOVE Clue)

    --
    #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
  194. I'd be willing to bet... by cybermint · · Score: 1

    ...that 95% of the geeks calling in sick are in the tech industry. I guess it will be a while more before the tech economy comes back.

  195. My department has... by craenor · · Score: 1

    Quarterly team building off-site events. We decided months ago that our team building event this quarter was going to be Revenge of the Sith + a pizza buffet on the 19th.

  196. I Sense something by Timberwolf0122 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I sense a disturbance in the work force, although a million geeks all called in sick, then suddly turned off there mobiles.

    --
    In the not too distant future, next Sunday A.D.
  197. Revenge of the S... by Riktov · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, they scrambled up the last three letters.

  198. Re:Cost to business? WTF?! by DeepDarkSky · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is very true. However, I think that the whole idea of costs to business is bullshit for another reason - we are entitled to take days off. Granted, we are talking about people using sick days to go see the movies - but we are entitled to sick days as well.

    A better system for days off is - in my company anyway, Paid Time Off. Basically, let's say you are entitled to 2 weeks vacation and 5 sick days per year, that's a total of 15 days. So they just give us 15 days off, paid, for any reason or purpose.

    If you get sick very often, it cuts into your vacation days. If you are healthy, you are not penalized with having fewer days off than your unhealthier coworkers. So if I choose to go see Star Wars and take a day off, it's not costing businesses anything - because those are days we are entitled to.

    Quite frankly, sick days are unfair - businesses give them under the pretenses of wanting to give employees the time, but then when they do, say it's costing the business.

  199. easy solution by thdexter · · Score: 1

    Veritas, across the street from Google in Mountain View, California, is simply renting out a theater for its employees to attend a showing at 10:00 AM opening day.

    --
    I'm on a road shaped like a figure eight; I'm going nowhere but I'm guaranteed to be late.
    1. Re:easy solution by praxis · · Score: 1

      Many companies do this, no? Our group here at Microsoft is doing the same, and I bet the theater will be full with other groups as well.

  200. Re:Probably most companies will make a profit by kyojin+the+clown · · Score: 1

    you called?

  201. Same story every time by DrXym · · Score: 1

    Dorks who risk their job for some lousy film deserve to be fired. See it at the weekend for fucks sake.

    1. Re:Same story every time by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      Agreed, i think this story should read "mental illness causes lost productivity"

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  202. Oh boo hoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some businesses lose some money because people are doing what makes them happy, and not working. What a shame. Next..

  203. I'll see it.. by rikkards · · Score: 1

    in about two months when there are maybe 10 people in the audience. It's a lot nicer to watch a movie when there is barely anyone there.

    If I had a big screen, I probably would wait until it came out on DVD. Then again looking at how long it too for Ep 4,5, and 6 to come out....

  204. Re:Probably most companies will make a profit by rikkards · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Unless your job directly brings in money from a client you are considered a non contributor.

    Sad I know.

  205. Never got the point by stud9920 · · Score: 0

    Is the film better because you camped two weeks to go to the premiere ? Is the film worse the Saturday after ?

  206. No Lost Productivity. by NewStarRising · · Score: 2, Funny

    " Challenger estimates that 4.8 million of those opening-day attendees are employed at least 35 hours per week. With those full-timers earning an average of $130.60 per day, the two-day cost in terms of lost wages and productivity would be a staggering $626,880,000, he said."

    How much of this is from people taking the holidays they are entitled to?
    What next? "Going to church on Sundays loses Business $3,289,044,353,967 per week!" ?
    Every second that a person is not working his ass off for an employer is "lost productivity" ? ? ?

    --
    b3 4phr41d 0f my 4bov3-4v3r4g3 c0mpu73r kn0wI3dg3!
    MadDwarf
  207. /. Vs SW by BigYawn · · Score: 0

    Did anybody evaluate how much money /. reading cost to employers every 2 days?... ;-)

  208. Er, no. by Lproven · · Score: 1

    I'm /considering/ going, as it'll be as cinematic event, but the other 5 were all rubbish and progressively worse the further you go. Actually, to be fair, I'm basing my opinion of #5, /Clones/, on hearsay - I couldn't be bothered to go see it nor rent it.

    So, maybe, if I can find a really cheap ticket. But the trailer makes it look very poor indeed - just another bit of mindless children's-story telling, driven mainly by flashy special effects.

    --
    Liam P. ~ "Intelligence is a lethal mutation." (me)
  209. It could be worse ... by bezuwork's+friend · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Ah, the hazards of being single.

    In law school, there is the famous case of 4 guys who were adrift at sea and nearing death from starvation. 3 had wives and families, one was young and just starting his career. The 3 older men decided they'd kill the younger as the younger had the least to lose and they'd eat him. That's what they did. They were rescued the next day.

    So this reasoning has been used for worse consequences than your situation

    BTW, the 3 were convicted but later released with time served. Apparently, public opinion was that the 3 were reasonable in what they did, as they didn't know they'd be rescued.

    1. Re:It could be worse ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you didn't know you would be rescued, why would you kill someone since you're all going to die anyway. Fucking asshats they should of been starved to death.

    2. Re:It could be worse ... by mcb · · Score: 1

      hmm, wouldn't dehydration be more of a problem than starvation?

    3. Re:It could be worse ... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      We're about 75% water, so their young friend provided more than just a good meal.

    4. Re:It could be worse ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      High sodium content, but yummy nonetheless.

    5. Re:It could be worse ... by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      As long as the forth guy agreed to being this evenings dinner then the other three were fine. Though man - I don't know - I might take starvation over eating a fellow human. But desparate times...

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    6. Re:It could be worse ... by enderwig · · Score: 3, Interesting
      In law school, there is the famous case of 4 guys who were adrift at sea and nearing death from starvation. 3 had wives and families, one was young and just starting his career. The 3 older men decided they'd kill the younger as the younger had the least to lose and they'd eat him. That's what they did. They were rescued the next day.

      It should have been the 3 with families that should sacrifice for the single guy. They already passed on their genes and burned up a bunch of their potential, while the young guy's potential will never be realized and hadn't his genes pass onto a child (that he knew of).

      Heartless bastards.
    7. Re:It could be worse ... by Tiggs23 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ugh--and if he didn't agree (although the other three very well may have guilted him into agreeing), not only do we have no way of knowing, but murdering someone else to save one's own life is STILL MURDER.

      --
      "The question isn't who is going to let me; it's who is going to stop me." --Ayn Rand
    8. Re:It could be worse ... by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      There are always extenuating circumstances and that is why a jury gets to hear the case. Assuming the group wasn't lying - their options were:
      1) Everyone dies
      2) One person dies

      Again it sucks.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    9. Re:It could be worse ... by Tiggs23 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So you're saying it's ok to murder one person, against his will (hence the term "murder"), to save the lives of three people? Hmm...sounds like democracy/socialism to me. Sacrificing the individual to the group.

      --
      "The question isn't who is going to let me; it's who is going to stop me." --Ayn Rand
  210. Missing poll option by sofar · · Score: 1


    ( ) The entire poll is missing!

    seriously would have made a good poll from this :^)

  211. Somebody think about the children! by HG2 · · Score: 1

    I really wonder how many schools even will bother to be open on that day....

  212. Employer Sponsored viewing by RazzleDazzle · · Score: 1

    My employer is sponsoring a viewing of the movie on Friday by renting out a theatre for just the company employees. Can't get any easier than that. You're even allowed to bring in your own food as long as it is not something sold at the concession stands, comes in a glass container, or is alcoholic. Pretty nice I would say.

    --
    ZERO ZERO ONE ZERO ONE ZERO ONE ONE! Just brushing up for my next big invention: Ethernet over Voice (EoV)
  213. I'm unemployed so I'll definately be there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nuff said

  214. How about Unpaid Overtime? by tenjah · · Score: 0

    Just before bed so I'll post this quickly.

    Whenever I see articles such as this it reminds of one comissioned by The Evening Standard a while back. It was analysing the amount of time saved and money earnt by big business due to employees working unpaid overtime. I don't do it so much, but I know alot of people who do. I can't recall the exact figures, but it was equivalent to the amount lost each time employees go sick blah blah.

    The way I see it, corporate big business gains a hell of alot more from our little wage slavery agreement in return than we, the cogs in the machine do.

    Quit your bitching you corporate fat-cats. Haven't you got a yacht that needs refuelling?

    Fair's fair, for every study like this, a reverse one should be published in return.

  215. Didn't you mean the day after? by Snaller · · Score: 1

    When people were sick? ;)

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  216. Excellent! .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Star wars day = national hack day!

    While you're all "away" and taking sickies...

    I'll be at home ... hacking all ur box3n!
    That you forgot to tighten up..

    Because ur all so .. damned excited by a "movie"!

  217. Tell your great boss by Snaller · · Score: 1

    Not to forget St. Whedon day ;-)

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  218. Ahhh.... by thegnu · · Score: 1

    You must be a Meta-Nerd. Maybe you should pirate the DVD? Would that be satisfying enough? Because you just know you'll be left out in the cold when everyone else on the planet sees it.

    Except China. They'll see War of Planets: Retribution of Evil!

    --
    Please stop stalking me, bro.
  219. "long term single" (chuckle) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "those of us who are single, particularly long term single"

    *cough*GAY*cough*

  220. Ultimate Sick Out by mrwhitethc · · Score: 1

    Hell I quit my job on the 18th =) BEAT THAT

  221. You know what the foot means? by Digital_Quartz · · Score: 1

    I think, perhaps, some people are taking this article a might bit too seriously.

    1. Re:You know what the foot means? by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

      it's the modern culture - life is meaningless if you can't be enraged about something. Hate Michael Moore, hate GW Bush, hate your mom, hate school, hate work...hate hate hate. It's only natural that when the teeming masses see an article like this they take it far too seriously, and get pissed off.

    2. Re:You know what the foot means? by kniLnamiJ-neB · · Score: 1

      Yes.... that's right, give in to your anger... FEEL the hate flowing through you... now you are discovering the true power of the Dark Side...

      I actually agree with you. People seem to bond over hating the same stuff. We derive some sort of tasteless superiority from "hating" things.

      --
      Windows isn't the answer... it's the question. NO is the answer!
  222. Because by JPelorat · · Score: 1

    Why do we measure things with money?

    Because there's no direct conversion to Libraries of Congress for this metric.

    --
    Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
  223. costing money? by riffraff · · Score: 1
    I'm curious about this statistic. If a person takes time off to do this, is it really costing the company money? Don't they get vacation time anyway? What makes vacation time watching a movie any more "expensive" than normal?


    If they are just skipping work without vacation time, don't they lose the pay? Doesn't the company get to keep the money then, therefore not losing any money at all?


    I'm just wondering where they are getting this information.

    1. Re:costing money? by praxis · · Score: 1

      I agree with you, but I think they were measuring "lost productivity". That's not the same as money. It's the money they would have made if everyone was at work that day. Of course, paid time off is usually accounted for when bean counters do that kind of math, so the "lost productivity" because of the movie makes little sense, the time off was already accounted for when the companies decided how many sick and vacation days an employee can take a year.

  224. Re:Probably most companies will make a profit by indifferent+children · · Score: 1
    So basically all managers are non-contributors. I always knew that on an instinctual level, but it is nice to see how it works.

    What if you participate in 'contributory copyright infringement' at work? Can you call yourself a contributor then? :-)

    --
    Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
  225. Certainly makes sense by sjonke · · Score: 2, Funny

    After you've finished watching the latest Star Wars abomination and realize that not only did you pay for it, but you could have spent the time sleeping or maybe recreating that crazy nail scene in Blade Runner on your own hand just for fun, you're bound to feel sick, so it makes perfect sense to take sick leave.

    --
    --- What?
  226. Why? by Danathar · · Score: 1

    I bought my tickets for a time after work. Why does one need to take off work just to see it. I don't know about most slashdotters...but my vacation and sick time are combined. So taking off a day to see ST:ROTS seems a bit expensive since that's paid leave I would be burning.

  227. I'll probably wait.... by joschm0 · · Score: 1

    until it's on TV.

    --
    01/20/09
  228. watch it later by thomsenb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why can't people just watch it after work? The movie's not going anywhere. It's ridiculous to skip work just cause you want to see a movie...grow up.

    1. Re:watch it later by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go ask the people that got in line 44 FRIGGIN DAYS EARLY. They'd easily be able to tell you. Maybe not, though, since in order to be able to sit in a fucking movie line for 44 days, they don't have jobs.

  229. how much again? by nashy-nunu · · Score: 0

    that day is a normal day for me. I am not into SW III. I will watch it a week or more later when the fanfare is hopefully over. I don't want to go watch it sitting on the first row and then leave with a horrible neck pain. So I will wait days

  230. Mega spoiler: Anakin is DARTH VADER!! by zardie · · Score: 2, Funny

    As per subject.

    Now you don't need to take a day off! It's good for us casual workers who don't get sick leave.

  231. Re:Cost to business? WTF?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quite frankly, sick days are unfair - businesses give them under the pretenses of wanting to give employees the time, but then when they do, say it's costing the business.

    I disagree with this one (I am a small business owner). When someone is sick, you don't WANT them around the office because they are contagious. So I fully encourage people to stay home when they are ill. I think it costs my business less overall, than having them come in, getting more people sick.

    Also, it's fairly easy to see when someone is repeatedly lying about being sick. You either notice firsthand, or you hear about it from other employees. So that's not a big concern for me.

  232. Productivity? by catdevnull · · Score: 1

    Whatever. Our brainiac bosses scheduled the IT picnic for that day. Talk about double jeopardy.

    --

    I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
  233. Wait... by CrazyTalk · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is the sickout for the day that Star Wars premiers, or for the day AFTER everyone has already seen it?

  234. Is this something new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait a second - how is Star Wars any different for a sickout than the first two days of the NCAA tournament in March - especially this year when the first day of the tournament fell on St. Patty's Day?

  235. I'm one of them! by SallyMac · · Score: 1

    I'm full out calling in sick, so count me in as one of those people.
    It's a 'planned' sick day though, in that I already told my bosses I'd be out :P

    --
    cleverly disguised as a responsible adult ||
  236. Meh. by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

    I'll see it when I'm strapped to a chair, with my eyelids screwed open, getting cured of my ultra-violent tendencies.

    --
    I drank what? -- Socrates
  237. best excuse? by cryptocom · · Score: 1

    I figure I'll walk in to work that day, sit down at my desk, and start cursing wildly and spazzing out. After about 15 minutes of that, I think my employer will probably ask me what's up. I'll explain to him that I'm already stressed out beyond comprehension because the IT department refuses to give me another harddrive, and that I am experiencing a Tourrette's Syndrome attack and need to go home.

    --
    It takes just a moment and an action to destroy. It takes some time and thought to create.
  238. Christmas. by Gannoc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wonder how much "productivity" we lose due to Christmas.

    1. Re:Christmas. by dick+johnson · · Score: 1

      I think the issue is slightly different as the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that Christmas is a national holiday -- not the same as people calling in sick so they can watch a movie.

      --
      - dj
    2. Re:Christmas. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget Christmas...how much productivity do we lose to people just not thinking about their job for a second or two? We should dock pay every time someone thinks about something else, and round it up to the nearest minute.

    3. Re:Christmas. by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      Comparing the premiere of a freaking movie to Christmas? WTF?

      Oh, never mind. I forgot where I was.

  239. Flashback... by m33t.sk33t.l33t · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Anyone else remember the Halo 2 Flu back in November? This is much like that. Hell, my teacher (Sci-Fi/Satire....of course he's a SW fan) is taking off for a personal day, as well as a bunch of others, but he's the one that's made the front page of the paper for Episodes I and II because he was dressed up as Darth. What a huge loser he is... it almost makes me feel sorry for him, but he's the role model for nerd, geeks, and dorks everywhere: he's married with two kids and he has a job....hmmm. You might not believe it but it's true!! LOL. Right, so all of us..ermm...."cooler" nerds that took off a few days because of the contagious and uncurable Halo 2 Flu are going to know how it feels to *gasp* work while the other people are busy making shrines and devoting all of their time to their obsessions. Oh, what a sad, sad, sad world. /// Is a Junior in HS, and a girl, so I should have no right to speak, let alone skip for the Halo 2 Flu, but I did...lol

  240. Laughing on Line, White Man! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In India, we have no starwars and we get fired if we skip work!

    What will your ROI obsssed execs think about leaving work to see your nerd show?

    How do you compete with us, white man?

    1. Re:Laughing on Line, White Man! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My execs are taking our entire group out to see the movie, they are paying for it. I guess since your attacking my color, I'll attack yours rag head. India is nothing to be proud of, it is a dirty smelly country.

  241. Life as Absurdist Comedy by Tony · · Score: 1

    Yes, it's absurd-- and FUN. It's more fun to pretend it's a big event than really watching the movie itself.

    Is there something wrong with that?

    Me, I'm saving my skip-work-for-a-movie day for King Kong. But that's me. I'm kinda lonely in my absurdist pretensions; if I joined the Star Wars crowd I'd at least have a lot of company.

    --
    Microsoft is to software what Budweiser is to beer.
  242. Re:Cost to business? WTF?! by Malc · · Score: 1

    I really dislike this PTO thing. It's a very very heavy handed way of dealing with people who abuse sick leave. We often can't help being ill. If I've saved for two years to go on a dream holiday, I don't want to lose it because I was sick for two weeks three months beforehand. I work to live, not live to work. If I owned my own business, I might have a different attitude, but I don't.

    BTW, don't you think that 15 days a year is pathetically small? I was on that for a while last year until it got increased to 20 days. In the UK I hear it is standard for new employees to have something like 22 days holiday in their first year. I know somebody who has worked for the NHS for 10 days, and she gets 33 days a year. It's no wonder so many people here in N. America are stressed out or dull to talk to compared with Europeans.

  243. A damning little summary :) by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1
    Even better. Read the summary again.
    The New York Post reports that it will cost employers $628,880,000 in lost productivity ...
    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
  244. What about those who are made sick BY the films? by frenchgates · · Score: 1

    I know I couldn't work for a week after seeing Jar Jar Binks step in poo in the Phantom Menace.

    --
    Syntax error: loose != lose, affect != effect, then!=than
  245. Bad Economics! No biscuit! by Tony · · Score: 1

    Economic cost of Episode III: $628,880,000
    Average price of movie ticket: $8.50
    Skipping work to see a stupid movie: priceless

    Seriously, though, this is EXACTLY LIKE the stupid headline on some stupid IT industry rag that said something idiotic like, "Slow modems cost the US $1.3B Annually!"

    I wish *my* job was sitting around pulling numbers out of my ass, instead of accomplishing *real* work.

    --
    Microsoft is to software what Budweiser is to beer.
  246. Time Off by filmguru · · Score: 1

    I scheduled a personal day back in April of 2004 when they announced the release date (yeah, that's right, a full 13 months ago). I know it's a geeky thing to do, but at the university where I work I knew there would be competition for time off and I didn't want to miss my chance.

  247. Bean Counters by gnurob · · Score: 1

    Stupid bean counts. Humans cannot apply themselves one hundred percent of a typical work week. Affording staff members necessary breaks at reasonable intervals improves productivity. Yes, this means you accountant types should buy us all tickets and re-think clipping those nose hairs.

  248. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  249. BACK TO WORK, YOU SLACKERS!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can always go to your Charlie Chaplin smarty pants moving pictures show after you've finished patching Mr. Dibble's tire!

  250. Return of the Sith? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For a website that supposed to be frequented by nerds, I can't believe you got the name of the film wrong! It's "Revenge of the Sith".

  251. BULLSH*T -- it's call "vacation" time by e40 · · Score: 1

    What claptrap. Many companies in the states have merged vacation/sick time, so it doesn't make one damn bit of difference why the person is not at work.

    Second, even if they weren't merged, TFA assumes people will put it down as sick time?? WTF??

    Third, and most importantly, it is actually a BENEFIT that people take time off. Vacation time is held on the books as a liability and when people use it you get to remove it. So, the balance of profit/loss tilts ever so slightly to the profit side.

    Please mod story to -1 (Troll).

  252. Wouldn't see Star Wars if the company paid? by helpslipfrank · · Score: 1

    Well, in a completely unexpected blast from the Dot-com past, the company I work for (now part of a multi-national) IS letting us take the afternoon off and paying for it! I almost had a heart attack when they dropped the movie ticket on my desk. I promptly walked into my managers office and stated "Now THIS is what I call improving fucking company moral! Hot Damn!".

    BTW, I have 2 1/2 kids, am under 30 (barely), and work 40 hours a week as a DBA (+ oncall 24/7). If you're single (or not) and working more than 40, don't whine. If your job requires that you work more that 40, either suck it up or get a new job. Salary is Salary, anyone who tells you differently is trying to exploit you.

  253. Re:Cost to business? WTF?! by psychofox · · Score: 1

    One bad thing about working in the States is the amount of holiday you get. In the UK for example, it is fairly standard to get 23 paid days off per year along with 10 paid 'bank' holidays. And if you are sick, you get paid. (Up to some limit, which is about 3 months...) Having said that, we tend to work extremely long hours.

  254. You can bitch all you want by Stone316 · · Score: 1
    But when your 80, those little vermin you violently hate will be taking care of your sorry ass while your sitting in a hospital, crapping in your depends and watching reruns of Wheel of Fortune because you have no one left in the world that gives a rats ass about you.

    We'll also ignore the fact that that working class at that time will be paying for your social security cheques, benefits, etc, etc. Keep in mind your paying for your parents now (or in the future) whether you see it or not.

    What it comes down to, is if people are foolish enough to let a other people walk all over them they get what they deserve. What your complaining about is called 'life', maybe you should get one. Also, you have some serious mental issues.

    --
    "Thanks to the remote control I have the attention span of a gerbil."
  255. blimey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    do people actually see star wars as a reason to bunk off work? i can just see them now.. rabid-mouthed counting down the hours until its released, searching the net hour after hour for any and all info they can get on the up&coming movie.. popcorn, coke, and starwars t-shirt laid out ready.. whatever will they do once the movie comes out and nothing more is to come? start watching star trek enterprise?

    then again, i'll bunk off work for a wank & a bag of weed, so i guess star wars is justifiable in some way.

  256. Yes, BUT... by wonkavader · · Score: 1

    They still have the advantage in networking and social building. Taking that break and hanging with the smokers is (if you pick your smokers well) good for your career.

    It's also good for your social life. You can meet folks at OTHER companies out there on the ledge where you (I mean they) smoke.

    And in most states, you're owed breaks. (If your employer gets sued it may force you to actually take 'em. You'll be surprised how much mandatory "stop what you're doing and waste some time" time there is.)

    1. Re:Yes, BUT... by Anonymous+Slacker · · Score: 1
      (...You'll be surprised how much mandatory "stop what you're doing and waste some time" time there is.)

      I thought that's what Slashdot was for...

      --
      "If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice!" -Rush
  257. MOD PARENT UP by tetsuji · · Score: 1

    Seriously, I have a couple of friends who have two small children and have a fabulous lifestyle on a single 45k salary. They just realized that they don't need all of the toys - but they have a nice house in an inexpensive part of town and everything that they really need. They're doing well enough, even, that the sole breadwinner is voluntarily leaving his job to go back to school to pursue a career that he's more interested in than his current position.

    It's all about quality of life - and you don't need to be making much money at all to have that.

  258. iclod! by Eric+S+Raymond · · Score: 1

    I don't have a job you insensitive CLOD!

    --
    Bypass Compulsory Web Registration -- http://bugmenot.com/
  259. Planned day off? by denidoom · · Score: 1

    Is it a loss of productivity or "absenteeism" if you actually planned with your manager to take that day off?

    --
    Lane Myer: I have great fear of tools. I once made a birdhouse in woodshop and the fair housing committee condemned it.
  260. More fun article idiocy by Jinsaku · · Score: 1
    Gives you an even more idea how "factual" the article is.

    Challenger estimates that 4.8 million of those opening-day attendees are employed at least 35 hours per week. With those full-timers earning an average of $130.60 per day, the two-day cost in terms of lost wages and productivity would be a staggering $626,880,000, he said.

    Math is not this guy's strong suit...

    while 4800000 x 130.60 is indeed 626880000... for his silly prediction, that's only one day. His real prediction number from his "figures" as actually double that, as it's two days.. so he really means that he thinks it'll cost companies $1.2B. Course, he probably saw that, said "meep! That's too high! People will actually check my math if I tell them a number that high!".

    Of course, he probably assumes that the 4.8 million people will skip *both* Thursday and Friday to watch the two hour movie.

    --
    -- Jinsaku
  261. Re:So.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We derive some sort of tasteless superiority from "hating" things.

    Our hate has made us powerful?;)

  262. Re:Cost to business? WTF?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One bad thing about working in the States is the amount of holiday you get.

    Huh? In the US there are only 10 federal holidays (Well 11 if New Years Day is on a weekday), and some companies don't even give you time off for a some like Memorial Day. So not every "US holiday" you see on the calendar is a day off of work for US employees. There maybe companies that give their workers St. Patrick's Day or Mother's Day off (never heard of the last one), but is by no means a common occurance.

  263. Ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You want to hear something crazy? I worked for a company which had 2000 people and 70 VPs.
    That doesn't even include middle-management. Of course we weren't profitable. Do you think
    they ended up laying off the VPs or people who really do work?
    How did you guess?

    Now, several years later, they're still not profitable. The CEO gets a million a year and so do the rest of them with
    fancy titles. Have they figured out how to make that company profitable yet? How did you guess?

  264. 4:20 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two jobs ago, I was build manager for a company I won't mention.
    Well, one morning, the build broke. They had it working by the late morning so I ran ant, make an RPM, etc., and had a new build for them.
    By the early afternoon, they decided they'd add some other features. So, I had to make another build. Right at 4:20, the build failed. I sent an email to the team that the build
    failed at 4:20 and what was everyone doing at 4:20? Only one person got the joke.
    What a bunch of geeks.

  265. Smokers at work piss me off! by malsdavis · · Score: 1
    "That's not counting her smoker time outside - which she managed to do at least ten minutes out of each hour."

    I escpecially sympathise with this line.

    I used to work in a local bar with about 6-8 bar staff during evenings. Just like you described, once an hour the smokers (about 2/3 of staff) would go out the back and have their chat ....oh and a smoke, leaving me and the few others who hope to live past 70 alone on the bar covering for them. After a while I started to go and join them for the extra 10 minutes break per hour, sometimes I would hold a cigerette to look the part and the boss never cared.

    When the boss found out I didn't actually smoke he demanded I stay behind the bar while the others went off and smoked.

    A couple of months later I quit to go to uni but have always been really annoyed at the way smokers get an extra break every hour or two just because they smoke.

    Why is it just smokers? At the time I had an equally unhealthy addiction to Counter-strike, would I have been allowed to go out the back to play Counter-Strike on a laptop for a few minutes once an hour?

    ...I didn't even bother asking. I still don't understand why such an unhealthy, anti-social habit which most countries are trying to reduce is encouraged this way by so many businesses?

  266. Re:I'll buy the DVD in China... this weekend...for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps they've outsourced the DVD printing to china? So maybe someone in a DVD factory leaked the print?

  267. huh? by Run4yourlives · · Score: 1

    That logic is a little backwards.

    If you have x sick days a year, and x vacation days a year, the company has already accounted for these days in your salary.

    They haven't lost shit, those days were already assigned. If you don't take them, they gain a little, but it's not the other way around.

  268. Waining? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "Waining"?

    I think you meant "Wayning," as in, "All this talk of a sickout is gonna make me hurl!"

  269. Re:Probably most companies will make a profit by rikkards · · Score: 1

    Yep their non contributors but they can use seniority as an excuse to axe their employees first.

  270. Re:Probably most companies will make a profit by rikkards · · Score: 1

    Damn! I used their instead of they're

    so tired.. so tired

  271. 2 days off by Reapman · · Score: 1

    but not because of Star Wars... it lucked out I needed thsoe days of for something else... hellooooo midnight showing!

  272. ditto by jonskerr · · Score: 1

    I'm addicted to sugar; except 3 times a day doesn't see all that much really. Try 6 or 7 times a day, small sugared bits a coworker leaves out for everyone to nip at, the skinny little bitch.

    --
    O~ Him that studies revenge keeps his own wounds green. -- Francis Bacon
  273. Bienvenu a la France! by jonskerr · · Score: 1

    >>People in the western world (or anywhere in the world) spend less time working than they ever have before.

    Bullshit! They work less than they have since the beginning of the industrial revolution. There is little documentation one way or the other prior to that, but in general people living in hunter/gatherer societies don't 'work' per se, they hang out all day doing things we do for leisure (such as hunting, and gathering things from the garden).

    BTW, people in the USA work more hours now than they have in a long time due to corporate management of our democracy. French people have 5 weeks of paid vacation per year, and retire at 80% of their former pay. Saving for retirement? they don't. No need to.

    --
    O~ Him that studies revenge keeps his own wounds green. -- Francis Bacon
  274. But... by talen_raith · · Score: 1

    You're forgetting one of the fundamental things about money: it flows. While the total amount of money in our economy might be finite, that finite amount of money changes hands quite a bit. For each of these various headlines, the issue isn't that this money was actually lost, it's that the money didn't travel through the related industry (or whatever); meaning that these instances of "lost productivity" were effectively blockages in the activity of our economy.

    Also, remember that most of these types of things are going to be statements of aggregate "losses"; one worker having to take a day to resolve his or her gastro-intestinal issues (or to go see the latest...well, whatever) might not seem like much, but add it up over every instance of it happening over every industry in which it happens, and you get these huge figures.

  275. R v. Dudley and Stephens (1884) by blorg · · Score: 1
    It's a very famous Victorian case. Necessity was not accepted as a defence; they were actually sentenced to death, although Queen Victoria later commuted the sentence to six months (the judge, Lord Coleridge, actually expressed the hope that she would do this.)

    One of the key issues pertinent to this discussion was that Coleridge didn't see any valid reason to choose the cabin boy for sacrifice over the other parties in the boat:
    "Who is to be the judge of this sort of necessity? By what measure is the comparative value of lives to be measured? Is it to be strength, or intellect, or what? It is plain that the principle leaves to him who is to profit by it to determine the necessity which will justify him in deliberately taking another's life to save his own. In [the present case] the weakest, the youngest, the most unresisting life was chosen. Was it more necessary to kill him than one of the grown men? The answer be, No."
    Wikipedia article
  276. Re:So.... by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

    Our hate has made us powerful?;)

    no, it's made us sheep.

  277. i believe it by jargel · · Score: 1

    me and the rest of the dev team from work get thursday afternoon off so we can go see the movie... ...and the company is even paying for our tickets and popcorn.