Slashdot Mirror


Fired for Solitare At Work

schlick writes "The Associated Press is carrying a story about a NYC employee fired after Mayor Michael Bloomberg noticed a game of solitare on the employee's desktop at work." From the article: "Greenwood, who earned $27,000 a year and had worked in the office for six years, said in a telephone interview that he limited his play time to his one-hour lunch or during quick breaks when he needed a moment of distraction. 'It wasn't like I spent hours and hours a day playing, because I had plenty to do,' Greenwood said. 'If I had been working at something exhaustively for two hours, I might get a cup of coffee and play for a minute but then go right back to my work.'"

680 comments

  1. If they enforced this by trickonion · · Score: 5, Funny

    If they enforced this I think about 99% of the slashdotters would be fire. I know I'd be 0wned

    --
    I got you an Andes mint, but it melted in my pocket
    1. Re:If they enforced this by jigjigga · · Score: 1

      I think they would be fired, I hope they dont turn you guys into fire! Oh noes! ;)

    2. Re:If they enforced this by slashbob22 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think you're right. There are a lot of people within the slashdot community which probably would loose their jobs if their Resource Use Agreement was enforced. I know I could end up in hot water one day for it. Thankfully I have an excuse, albeit weak, that I am monitoring IT trends - which loosely couples with my position.

      I would personally like to see a study on how many people are compliant with their agreements. From a survey of my cube-buddies; I know we would all fail. At the same time, I don't usually stop for lunch, so I don't see the harm in taking a thought-break - without which, I am sure my productivity would drop.

      --
      Proof by very large bribes. QED.
    3. Re:If they enforced this by Ucklak · · Score: 3, Funny

      1 word....

      soduko

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    4. Re:If they enforced this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      It's two words, and you spelled them both incorrectly. Su doku. Jackass, however, is one word.

    5. Re:If they enforced this by oneils · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This has to be some sort of hoax. Aren't government employees in the States, or New York, unionised? If not, I apologise for my ignorance. I am a government employee in Canada. The most common way to fire me would be as part of a downsizing exercise and even in that case pains would be taken to transfer me elsewhere. The only other way would be to have a well documented case history of my incompentence. One game of solitaire just would not cut it. I don't know why anyone would put up with this and just shrug and say "oh well, he's the boss...you/he/I should shape up." You're reaction should be, damn...its time to get some organised labour up in here.

    6. Re:If they enforced this by hdparm · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If this is a policy at NYC, the whole desktop management team should have been fired too, for leaving the game available for users.

    7. Re:If they enforced this by Catbeller · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You have to love it, Canadian person. Look at the postings on this page; they are siding WITH THE MAYOR against one of their own. That's where our unions are.

      I've been immersed in this culture my whole life, and it takes a short shock of outside air to look at it anew. We've a country that hates "socialism" so much that they organize to keep inions OUT of their workplace. The salaries shrink, pensions disppear, healthcare is repeatedly slashed for current employees and denied to new, "temporary" employees who never will become permanent. And they will side with the employers every time.

      There's a book, "What's the Matter with Kansas?", which, altho not really being about Kansas, addresses this all-pervasive phenomenon here in the south. Wage slaves vote against their own interests, and those of the families, because of their distaste of "socialism" and "big government".

      It's a waterfall to the bottom of the gorge. The center ain't holding, and we're all being flushed, except for the very tippy top of the social scale, which is swimming in money and will pretty much own everything.

      Got any room up there for expats? I'm thinking WAY up north, given the warming to come. A place without cameras on every street, a scenario the Mayor of Chicago is bringing to fruition. Our new transit passes will track our movements, we're to be watched at all times, they're reading our email and listening to our phones down here. I didn't waste all that time growing up to live in a prison populated by cowards overseen by the paranoid and greedy.

    8. Re:If they enforced this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe you should try crossword puzzles for a while. ;)

    9. Re:If they enforced this by operagost · · Score: 3, Funny

      I just can't believe that this guy's been working at the same job in NEW YORK and only makes $27,000! A newly-hired custodian makes more than that! Bloomberg may have done him a favor.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    10. Re:If they enforced this by networkBoy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ironically though, spending hours on /. is less likely to get you canned than 1 min of solitare. Why? because it's not a "game" so the PHB is less wise of it.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    11. Re:If they enforced this by JWtW · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm in mechanical design (sorry, not IT), and many times throughout the day, I need to focus on something different. Slashdot is my usual refuge, because I dare the network nazis to ban me from here (if any of you are reading, this isn't my work acount. My UID is much lower at work.. :-)

      Anyway, as far as the RUA, I think that everybody could get fired--if it was enforced. It's never enforced until it's needed.

      How many of you admins pass over the receptionist's Christmas shopping on company time?

      I'm seeming cocky here, even trollish, but, isn't this a case of 'you gotta go'?

    12. Re:If they enforced this by flogic42 · · Score: 1

      This is why I want to start my own company and be my own boss. Fucking corporate fascists.

      --
      Check out my women's designer clothing store.
    13. Re:If they enforced this by StarKruzr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Basically, the guy got really unlucky and got made an example of. I hope he finds some way to get compensation, but it isn't likely.

      --

      +++ATH0
    14. Re:If they enforced this by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      My "Boss is coming" key would pop up a loudly labeled "Michael Bloomberg. Confidential IRS Investigation" window, wait a second, then remove everything from a screen. That way, his short-term memory would be electro-shocked into forgetting about the cards of the screen.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    15. Re:If they enforced this by platypus · · Score: 5, Funny

      Heh, we are reading "stuff that matters".
      Nobody gets fired for that!

    16. Re:If they enforced this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHHAAHAHAH, someone seriously do this i would pay to see a boss's eye twitch and like just see his brain fry and sizzle, then come back on with a pop saying "good work william"

    17. Re:If they enforced this by Kaptain_Korolev · · Score: 0

      This is why we have lynx, subversive browsing in a terminal all the way! If I'm surfing for work related stuff I use Firefox, for /. and other stuff I have a terminal running lynx. ASCII pr0n is under-rated!

    18. Re:If they enforced this by fufubag · · Score: 1

      So why are you still here?

    19. Re:If they enforced this by DrWho520 · · Score: 1

      The radio was talking about this yesterday. (Well, not the magical box, but the tiny little people stuck inside.) The idiot left solitaire maximized and walked away from his desk. The mayor walks in and sees it on his screen. I propose the Greenwood Award. Most deserving removal from the working pool (as opposed to the gene pool.)

      --
      The cancel button is your friend. Do not hesitate to use it.
    20. Re:If they enforced this by UseTheSource · · Score: 1

      We always joked at my office, that if they ever banned Slashdot, there'd be riots in the hallways.

      If they did, though... It's a definite plus knowing the proxy/firewall admins. ;)

      --
      "Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Führer." -Adolf Hitler
      "We are one Nation, we are one People." -The One 'leader'
    21. Re:If they enforced this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah...

      or sudoku you illiterate bastard!

      best regards,

      the spelling nazi

    22. Re:If they enforced this by sasdrtx · · Score: 1

      Or sudoku?

      --
      Most people don't even think inside the box.
    23. Re:If they enforced this by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      There's this site http://www.soduko.org/ that I visit and I just recently noticed both spellings. The title graphic has the correct spelling but the URL and puzzles have the incorrect.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    24. Re:If they enforced this by Cal+Paterson · · Score: 1

      Obviously, the employee is on fire.

    25. Re:If they enforced this by Voltageaav · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah, here where I work, Slashdot is one of the VERY few nongovernment sites not blocked. Even some sites relavant to my work are banned. Even my personal webpage is blocked after two visits to it for links.

      --
      Someone save me from this sanity.
    26. Re:If they enforced this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. And through the legal doctrine of attractive nuisance, they could be held legal responsible. Sue the city!

      IANAL

    27. Re:If they enforced this by TallMatthew · · Score: 1
      No one who works for the city makes squat. They do it because they love the city.

      Which makes this dope of a mayor a complete asswipe for firing the guy. But this guy's pretty much an asswipe anyway. I recently spoke with someone who worked for the city and they said when he comes to your office, they make anyone that's over a certain height leave the room for fear a picture might come out that shows the public what a dwarf he is.

      But this is America and he's rich, so obviously his character is not to be questioned.

    28. Re:If they enforced this by sasdrtx · · Score: 1

      Well, I know just enough Japanese to say that "soduko" is almost certainly incorrect. There is no representation for "du", at least in the normal spelling system. is sudoku in Hiragana. "soduko" would be , which would be pronounced "sozuko", more or less.

      Well, the hiragana doesn't show up on preview, so this is probably a waste.

      --
      Most people don't even think inside the box.
    29. Re:If they enforced this by Anti_zeitgeist · · Score: 1

      Same here. My job has all sites blocked unless they end in .org .gov.or edu. There are a few sites that are such as google or anything medical related.

      --
      If it wasn't for C, we would be stuck using BASI, PASAL and OBOL.
    30. Re:If they enforced this by MegaThawt · · Score: 1

      Yes, indeed! In fact, if the Mayor enforced his own rules consistently, he might have to fire himself:

      "I expect all city workers, including myself, to work hard," the mayor said. "There's nothing wrong with taking a break, but during the business day, at your desk, that's not appropriate behavior."

      So what was the Mayor's behavior doing during his business day?

      Bloomberg made the rounds with his photographer, greeting workers and posing for pictures.

      Wasting time, interrupting workers, wasting tax payer's money.

      --
      All sigs should be as funny as possible, but no funnier.
    31. Re:If they enforced this by ShaneThePain · · Score: 1

      give up the Fascist thing. Im a fascist and I dont appreciate your bigotry.

      --
      Fascism is the greatest political ideology ever conceived. Sorry.
    32. Re:If they enforced this by BigGerman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      yes I used to wonder why that was. Not-blocking Slashdot is very typical for all kinds of sensitive sites I worked at: defence contractors, three-letter agencies, etc. Then I realized: security folks and sysadmins have to read something too.

    33. Re:If they enforced this by oneils · · Score: 1

      Yes, that is shitty pay. I had no idea that NYC paid such crap. On a side note...I seem to have touched a nerve with my comment above. I'm not advocating a government overthrow or a mass exodus to Canada. Jesus Christ people, get a union with balls already.

    34. Re:If they enforced this by chigun · · Score: 1

      I'm IT for a casino and here internet abuse is only used to fire people. There is an agreement and all stating that you can't look at non-work related blah blah blah, but no one adheres to it, least of all the IT department.

      The beauty part is that our "auditor" only has just enough power to check cookies on people's computers, so setting firefox to clear itself out every time you close it is a godsend. to look at logs from the corporate level is a REALLY BIG DEAL that takes a lot of paperwork and also HR has to get involved, so they never do it.

      At any rate, to be safe(r) i use a site called logmein.com which lets me log into my computer remotely and browse whatever the hell i want. mostly i use it to manage my torrents throughout the day though.

      Anyone know what kind of data is being sent by a remote terminal like logmein (it runs out of the browser)?

      --
      swanker than you
    35. Re:If they enforced this by neuroticia · · Score: 1

      That might have something to do with the "links" on your personal webpage being to porn sites? ;)

    36. Re:If they enforced this by neuroticia · · Score: 1

      Doesn't the auditor become suspicious when the web browser hasn't been used for anything? :p It's the first thing that would clue me in to network abuse. And once you know who's doing it, it's not that big a deal to monitor them personally.

    37. Re:If they enforced this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's spelled "solitaire"

    38. Re:If they enforced this by GeekyMike · · Score: 2, Interesting

      heck, its on the favorites folder of all new network profiles, under "Industry News" I work for a cable provider owned by Paul Allen. I wonder if that has anything to do with it.

      --
      Beware the fury of a patient man
      - John Dryden
    39. Re:If they enforced this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Boring" is one word, while "waste of time" is three. Sudoku is stupid.

    40. Re:If they enforced this by chigun · · Score: 1

      Yeah he gets suspicious when there are no cookies, but there is nothing he can do about it, nor can he prove there any abuse. At this casino alone, we have over 1000 employees, so monitoring someone more "personally" is pretty much impossible.

      --
      swanker than you
    41. Re:If they enforced this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The guy's name is etc.IX I think this is probably the first time someone in his family has been tagged. Viva la DNA!

    42. Re:If they enforced this by eam · · Score: 1

      I can see how that would go.

      them: We think you're misuing resources.

      me: I'm not.

      them: Still, we want you to monitor your network activity and let us know.

      me: OK.

      [weeks pass]

      me: I'm not.

      them: OK.

    43. Re:If they enforced this by HTL2001 · · Score: 1

      exactly.... same thing in my school - websense: site blocked for category "games" but theres a continue button. The techs arn't stupid, they are just as lazy as the students :) (HS, BTW)

      --
      By reading this, you have given me brief control of your mind.
    44. Re:If they enforced this by zerofret · · Score: 1

      At the Federal Government Agency I work for we also ban game playing at work. Of course we then take the next logical step and actually remove the games from the machines we set up for our users. We also lock down the permissions so the users can't put the games back on. If they don't want people playing solitare on their office PCs, then they shouldn't be providing it.

      IANAL, but I would think if the guy gets himself a decent lawyer he probably could get something for wrongful termination. The application he was fired for using was after all provided to him by management. It is also incumbent upon management to demonstrate that they were actively enforcing this rule on all employees. If other employees had been playing games at work and had not been disciplined for it, then there's a real good "disparity of treatment" case here.

      I expect that this guy is going to come out of this okay, as long as he actually fights back. Either he gets his job back with full back pay and an apology, or he picks up a chunk of change via lawsuit. I also expect that the office he worked at is finally going to get serious about the no games at work rule, once they find out how defective their termination of this guy was.

    45. Re:If they enforced this by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Workplace hint: Minimize is your friend!

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    46. Re:If they enforced this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, for one, welcome our new Solitare-hating overlords!

  2. Terms of use by Unknown_monkey · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What was his computer policy at work? If I do it, I'm fired if they want to enforce it.

    1. Re:Terms of use by Mrs.+Grundy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm sure a lot of places of similar policies. To me, though, the disconcerting part of this story isn't that someone got fired for playing solitaire, it's that the mayor came in and fired somebody of whose work performance he was ignorant based on one impression. This guy could have been the most productive person in the building for all the mayor knew. If I was in charge of this employee I would have been seriously pissed if someone came in and decided to fire my employee. It's arrogance and micromanagement taken to an extreme height. On the other hand it appears this guy new the mayor was coming to shake his hand and have a photo taken and left the game up--that's really not so bright.

    2. Re:Terms of use by gswallow · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh come on.

      The frickin' MAYOR is coming to your office. Not of Paducah, KY, but of New York City. He probably hasn't been there for three years. Don't you think you'd better make yourself a little more presentable?

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of saying "nice doggy" until you can find a rock.
    3. Re:Terms of use by Billly+Gates · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I work in a different industry but its like this where I work.

      I do I.T. work at an amusement park but I also drive trams when its busy because its what I did before I got promoted. Anyway the CEO here has fire d people for sitting down at work and for even using a cell phone in a private break area away from guests. No cells allowed nor is looking like your not working in front of guests allowed. Cells outside of the public are allowed but its different when he is around. Even though I work in IT, I was asked by him why I was not picking cigarette butts where I was volunteering to work (clearing trams). I would have been termed onsite and to me its silly but that is just business as usual.

    4. Re:Terms of use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well no matter what the computer policy was they fucked it up. Windows is perfectly capable of not allowing anyone to run Solitare if that's what they want the policy to be. That they didn't indicates that this wasn't something they considered important enough to even have a discussion about.

      Next time the retard wants to lay blame, the little midget should check out a mirror. (Step stool not included)

    5. Re:Terms of use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      On the other hand it appears this guy new the mayor was coming to shake his hand and have a photo taken and left the game up--that's really not so bright.

      He probably figured he wasn't going to get any real work done anyway and that having the mayor visit was just a chance to kick back and relax.

      What he didn't realize was that the mayor wanted to do some photo ops in front of hard working employees to help with his poll numbers. Essentially he got fired for making the big boss look slightly foolish.

      Basically, you've got a clueless underling and a vindictive overlord

    6. Re:Terms of use by CustomDesigned · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Two of my clients had a no games policy. However, they had me remove all games from the computers. This way, there was no temptation. One went further, and had me install squid with a list of approved websites needed for business. Everything else was blocked.

      It really is unreasonable to have such policies without some kind of technical help to enforce them. It doesn't need to be bullet proof - it just makes things easier for the employees honestly trying to follow the policy.

      A related issue is the monthly limit on total bytes transferred with my cable company TOS. I wouldn't mind it, if only they provided a meter on their website somewhere where I could see how much I had left for the month. Without that, I am just guessing and hoping they don't get strict on me all of a sudden. I know I could build a system to track it myself using iptables - but haven't got around to it yet.

    7. Re:Terms of use by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Ok, but those conditions (as I would assume) were made up clear up-front, and ifnot, the first time you'd make the 'offence' he would (and again, I assume) give you at least a first (and last) warning.

      Whereas it probably also was made clear beforehand that playing games during businesshours was prohibited in the case of the NYC employee, there could at least have been a 'final warning' or serious discussion: What this guy did is purely covering his own ass: -HE- wanted to be a publicity whore, he'd better prepare and sterilize the grounds he's doing that on beforehand (eg. don't give people priviledges to play/install games).

      On a side note: I am too tired to dig up any past Slashdot articles, but I clearly remember one research that stated that having those little game-breaks/walk-breaks stimulated productivity overall in the end (the mind being more clear/just having something to get distracted from a few minutes).
      It's measuring with two sizes (if that's even a valid expression) if people -are- allowed to have their watercooler breaks, but aren't allowed to have a 'game-break'.

      And of course, one should not be playing Solitaire all day at work... or reading Slashdot for that matter. Get back to work!

    8. Re:Terms of use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      As someone who has worked for in a state agency IT department for the past couple years, I can only speak from my own experience. When our commissioner was making a tour of the building, word got around quicker than lightning, and everyone made it a point to look busy. In the management levels of our department, micromanagement is commonplace (my DIRECTOR told a coworker to change the color of a button three times before conceding it was the right shade "IBM blue"), and inefficiency is a staple of a state employees' workday (middle management fears the employee courtesy of our omnipotent union, so they turn the other cheek).

      It seems this poor sap was just a victim of being ignorant of his surroundings. There is more than enough surfing the web, making private phone calls on public time, and other mis-use of state resources than I can shake a stick at, and no one is ever even talked to about it.

      It seems he is either being made an example of, too stupid to realize "the mayor is standing behind you, dude" or someone just had it out for him. The unions have so much strength in a state agency while representing their workers that you need at least a dozen different complaints filed against a particular individual before you can even address the issue with their supervisor's manager.

      Bloomberg is on the news where I live every day. How can you fail to recognize he is standing directly behind you, even when you are truly engulfed in a compelling round of timed solitaire?

    9. Re:Terms of use by Bad+D.N.A. · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...has fired people for sitting down at work and for even using a cell phone in a private break area away from guests.

      Sounds to me like it's time to get a new job.

      If you are good at what you do, then why are you putting up with these kind of working conditions?

      My recomendation is to quit NOW

      --
      "Truth is much too complicated to allow anything but approximations"
    10. Re:Terms of use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I have.

      I worked at an AOL call center and I could not deal with the pressure and handle time requirements. I go to school and there is a shortage of jobs where I live in Florida. No industry. So I suck it up.

      I used to have much better jobs before moving hereeee. It is silly I am being paid 9/hr and I service over 1000 computers and some of them are required for ride operation. But I bet he thought I was a minimal wage guy just clearing trams because of my outfit on did not say IT because I was not working in that department that day. I would have been termed if I told him I refuse to pick cigarette butts because I work in IT. I mean if he asks someone if you like your job you better say yes. Otherwise its onsite termination. He did that too but my guess is he had a good reason to do it. You dont double cross the CEO.

    11. Re:Terms of use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, that's one Mickey Mouse job!

    12. Re:Terms of use by iwsnet · · Score: 0

      What about people who surf the Internet all day at work? That is a much bigger time-waster than solitaire.

    13. Re:Terms of use by TychoCelchuuu · · Score: 1

      He wasn't playing Solitaire; he had left it on his computer from a while ago. The mayor was in the office getting his picture taken with staffers, and the guy invited the mayor into his office to get a picture without minimizing Solitaire first.

      --
      Against stupidity the Gods themselves contend in vain.
    14. Re:Terms of use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who lives in Paducah, I can assure you that our Mayor wouldn't have brought it up.

    15. Re:Terms of use by subterfuge · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The mayor should be fired for wasting his and the staff's time with this touchy-feely Grab 'n' Grin nonsense.

      Additional point: If use of this app is against policy why did IT leave it on the image? If is wasn't there is wouldn't be used. If NYC IT needs help in this area I am available for US$5000/wk plus travel, two meals/day [my choice of which meals and where], a room at the Trump for the duration [Park View w/jacuzzi] and tickets to Spamlot...

      = ; ^ ) >

    16. Re:Terms of use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      A related issue is the monthly limit on total bytes transferred with my cable company TOS. I wouldn't mind it, if only they provided a meter on their website somewhere where I could see how much I had left for the month. Without that, I am just guessing and hoping they don't get strict on me all of a sudden. I know I could build a system to track it myself using iptables - but haven't got around to it yet.

      % /sbin/ifconfig
      ...
      RX bytes:1553527159 (1.4 GiB) TX bytes:24775685347 (23.0 GiB)
      ...

      Don't tell me yer one of those fools who reboots?

    17. Re:Terms of use by drewmca · · Score: 1

      I say we band together and kill him.

    18. Re:Terms of use by RonMcMahon · · Score: 1

      Man, who would have thought that working at Disneyland would be so rough?

    19. Re:Terms of use by scardina · · Score: 1

      Mickey's a tougher boss than I would have thought. I hear Goofy got canned for having a smoke behind the teacup ride.

    20. Re:Terms of use by Midnight+Warrior · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If a big-time politician came wandering through my cube, (and a couple have) you have two obligations: clean up your desk, and greet the distinguished visitor with a smile. If your boss asked you to work during the tour, let's not be an idiot about it - find some work, or at least repeat some work you've already done. The VIP doesn't know the difference. "Sir, I'm working on an analysis of the workload levels of the T&M contractors the city hires to see if we're getting a good return on our contracts." Never mind it was something you did 3 months ago.

      Oh, and don't act like you aren't the BOFH that opens up old network statistics charts or network snoops, pouring over them when the big boss comes in. "Sir, I'm tracking through some anomalous network activity our SOA layer got during last night's advertising during the Olympics opening ceremony."

      Anybody caught doing something stupid when a VIP is in the room deserves what they get. It's like seeing a cop in the median a mile ahead and then getting the bright idea to shift four lanes of traffic and pass on the right. You're begging for it. "My cell phone rang and I was just trying to honor good road safety rules, officer." Yeesh.

    21. Re:Terms of use by Thangodin · · Score: 1

      Well, Bloomberg is pretty anal. Banning smoking in New York? There's something vaguely blasphemous about that--I remember a scene in Sex in the City where Carrie goes to a backlot of New York to escape the politically correct Nazis and have a smoke in peace. Yeah, I know smoking is bad for you, but it might be better to ban fast food joints--a recent New York Times article (genital dimensions required) talked about the skyrocketing incidence of diabetes in New York. Diabetes rips your body apart, causing chronic health problems for decades (at least smoking tends to kill quickly.) The implications for public health costs and readiness are staggering. Of course, the advance of diabetes, and its causes, require a bit more subtle consideration, something a knee-jerk PC type like Bloomberg is not particularly adept at...

    22. Re:Terms of use by atomic+brainslide · · Score: 1

      Additional point: If use of this app is against policy why did IT leave it on the image? If is wasn't there is wouldn't be used.

      mod parent up. this observation is spot on. if there is a policy and it states "no games" then the systems admin should be fired for not locking down stations correctly. if there's no policy or it does not say "no games" the guy deserves a big fat paycheque for wrongful dismissal.

      --
      check out my comic: Essential Tremors
    23. Re:Terms of use by SetupWeasel · · Score: 1

      There is a difference between Mayor and Governor. No smoking in public buildings is a state law. Pataki would have signed that law. Now that I have lived with it for a couple of years, I have to say that it is a law I wholly endorse. I have asthema that can be aggrivated by cigarette smoke, and it makes breathe easier quite literally.

    24. Re:Terms of use by SetupWeasel · · Score: 1

      Let's look at another fact. The employee was making $27K. I would break even here with that salary. I'm always of the opinion that the people you pay like shit should get a little leeway for the privlidege of paying them so little.

      I hope the guy gets unemployment.

    25. Re:Terms of use by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Dont work for Mickey mouse. But your close... think about what other big park? Hmmm

      But yes they treat mickey employees like shit too and at least they are unionized. They recieve 275 applications a day. There is someone from my department who used to work there and he told me that he had days where your scheduled to show up for only 3 hours?? At that wage your paying more for gas. Dont like it? Tough shit... someone can replace you wihtin 48 hours.

      Even though I work in IT I still get paranoid executives that treat everyone like shit. Goofing on the side its like a big prison. But even the VP of the park who gets paid 150k/year is expecting to pick up trash to make it look clean to guests or find another job when the CEO is there. Nice hu?

    26. Re:Terms of use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference between a smoker and an overweight person is that the former is polluting the air that others breathe. The overweight person won't harm another person unless they sat on them or something.

    27. Re:Terms of use by ChrisGilliard · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's crazy. I wonder what Bloomberg would think if he walked into my company's office. We have a pool table, ping pong, etc. I've even seen places with an xbox or playstation. What's so bad about taking a break? Technically, even at an office job, you are allowed two 10 minute breaks per day by law. I suppose that Bloomberg could argue that the computer is not allowed to be used during these breaks, but give me a break! This is a great policy if you want to have a bunch of 9 to 5ers that don't really give a crap about their job. But if you want to have employees that actually try to accomplish goals as opposed to punching a clock and cashing a paycheck, you might want to have a little faith that they will do some work and manage thier own time.

      --
      No Sigs!
    28. Re:Terms of use by SnowZero · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He wasn't playing Solitaire; he had left it on his computer from a while ago.

      According to who?... Oh yeah the person who got fired; Of course he'd tell the truth if he was playing at the time, right? Really, how many people leave Windows applications up that you aren't using? If you're not using it, it should be minimized. Windows doens't have enough screen real estate otherwise, and it blocks your access to the desktop.

      So in short, I think the guy is whitewashing his story. Getting canned for playing a game is harsh, but you should know better when a VIP comes to visit.

    29. Re:Terms of use by epee1221 · · Score: 1

      think about what other big park?
      All I can think of is Six Flags.

      --
      "The use-mention distinction" is not "enforced here."
    30. Re:Terms of use by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Access to the desktop? I've got all the programs I need in my three quicklaunch bars. Why does anyone need the desktop? You can have windows overlapping each other and switch between them without ever seeing some of the lower ones.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    31. Re:Terms of use by Nataku564 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, cuz obviously their previous employment history has absolutely nothing to do with the continuation of their work contract. Everyone screws up. Just because someone has a big head doesn't mean its fine to get fired because they dont believe you are doing something.

      Cops will give you a warning, or perhaps a ticket if they feel it is necessary. Heck, sometimes they even cut you slack because of your good record. VIPs should take a lesson from this kind of behavior, instead of being the cop that takes you downtown for forgetting to signal.

    32. Re:Terms of use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The frickin' MAYOR is coming to your office. Not of Paducah, KY, but of New York City."

      I could care less what city. He's another human being. He's the boss, for the present term. Don't overplay this like anyone outside of NYC gives a shit about him.

      "Don't you think you'd better make yourself a little more presentable?"

      No one, and I mean no one, that engages in social interaction in their adult life has ever been in an expected and anticipated social situation and NOT made a mistake.

      Even politicians make such errors, and sometimes they're caught on tape. After this incident, I wonder if the Mayor has any. I hope he does. Fortunately for the Mayor, he's not subject to the immediate whims of his constitutes and can serve his term.

    33. Re:Terms of use by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      As of kernel 2.2, this rolled over at 2.1 GB, making it useless for long periods of time or large quantities of data. (Don't know about 2.4/2.6, have they fixed it?)

      However, couple ifconfig with a cron script that grabs this input, oh, say, every 5 minutes, and you have a neat history of usage on a 5-minute basis. Of course, there are many other ways to skin that cat.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    34. Re:Terms of use by xdc · · Score: 1

      I stopped using the quicklaunch bar because whenever I would update or install some programs, they would spam shortcuts into it, making it a maintenance pain. For years now, I've been happily using keyboard shortcuts for most of the programs I am likely to use. No moving a mouse across the screen to click a tiny box. Just press a familiar key combo and the app starts. I recommend it.

    35. Re:Terms of use by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Your eating fast food doesn't give me diabetes.

      I'm fine with laws that protect people from each other. I'm against laws that attempt to protect people from themselves. Seems simple enough to me.

      at least smoking tends to kill quickly.
      Emphysema and heart disease are slow enough.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    36. Re:Terms of use by redog · · Score: 1

      Why, its not like hes some fucking hero. Hes just another filthy politician trying to help the federal government take our liberties away.

    37. Re:Terms of use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny


      Oh, and don't act like you aren't the BOFH that opens up old network statistics charts or network snoops, pouring over them when the big boss comes in. "Sir, I'm tracking through some anomalous network activity our SOA layer got during last night's advertising during the Olympics opening ceremony."

      Pfft, that's how I got rid of my last boss. "Oh, I'm just cleaning up all traces of the child porn you downloaded earlier"

    38. Re:Terms of use by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      One went further, and had me install squid with a list of approved websites needed for business. Everything else was blocked.

      It really is unreasonable to have such policies without some kind of technical help to enforce them. It doesn't need to be bullet proof - it just makes things easier for the employees honestly trying to follow the policy.


      You've clearly never worked in such an environment if you think it makes things easier for anyone. Take it from someone who has: the list of approved websites always catches something you legitimately need for work, you then need to stop what you're doing and chade the sysadmin around to get it unblocked. In the end, everyone gets a lot less work done (including the sysadmin who's now having to service the unblock requests).

      This kind of filtering is fine in places like schools, but in a work environment there should be a clear IT policy and disciplinary action taken if someone breaks policy. Of course any employer who thinks firing someone is the _first_ course of disciplinary action is clearly insane (and in the UK the employer would almost certainly be up on unfair dismissal charges for firing someone just because they had solitare open).

      But employers ultimately need to learn that preventing employees from enjoying their jobs isn't going to improve their work output in the long run, it'll just make them disenfranchised and quit.

      If someone is doing good work but spending 10 minutes a day playing solitare then so what? - 10 minutes is nothing and if you repremand them for it and make their job suck the quality of all their work will go down. The employer will be worse off and the employee will be looking for another job.

      Sadly some employers seem to think they will get more work out of people if they make their jobs suck. Whilest this may be true for a while, as soon as the employees can get out they will - I often wonder if my last employer has worked out that this is why 5 of us (out of 8 employees) quit within a month of eachother.

    39. Re:Terms of use by Mad+Merlin · · Score: 1
      Assuming you're talking about the stats you can see in ifconfig, it rolls over around 4G now. At least I've never seen higher than about 4.2G, and I'm at
      RX bytes:4264604962 (4067.0 Mb)
      right now on eth0.
    40. Re:Terms of use by daspriest · · Score: 1

      All I got is Busch Gardens, Universal studios(I think there's one in Florida), or Sea World

    41. Re:Terms of use by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Its like this:
      You are doing a task (say, writing some code) and your boss says that you need to deliver it by xyz date.
      So you deliver it by that date and it takes you whatever time it takes.
      Then your boss looks and sees that you spent x hours of that time reading the internet or playing games or whatever else other than working and assumes that if the employee wasnt "wasting company time" for those x hours, they could have delivered the item x hours earlier.
      Which is why they then ban "time wasting" items such as solitare and slashdot thinking it will increase productivity (it probobly wont though)

    42. Re:Terms of use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You hit the nail on the head. Lets number the reasons:

      1) The employee reported to someone other than Bloomberg so Bloomberg over-stepped the chain of command by firing this guy.

      2) Punishment should fit the crime. This guy could easily sue the crap out of Bloomberg and would win. (but he won't cause he's an admiring Republican who makes peanuts (27k) but still thinks his boss is god)

      3) If he really was on a break or lunch than there is no crime! Breaks and lunch is his own time.

      4) This is totally classist. Let me tell you, if it was the chief of police or the DA or someone else (all of whom play a not of solitaire at work) Bloomberg wouldnt dream of firing them or their would be full scale mutiny!

    43. Re:Terms of use by Syberghost · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm sorry, but at this point, one's work history is irrelevant. There have been so many people fired for playing games that playing a game at work, even if it complies with the written words of your company's policies, is such an act of monumental stupidity that it marks the offender as someone with such colossaly bad judgement that they are clearly not to be trusted making decisions for your business, at any level.

      I mean, you KNOW this will probably get you fired, you KNOW that people can see you doing it from across the room, through the door, and down the hall, and you KNOW that no court is going to make things "right" if you do, because a jury is unlikely to be composed of 12 people with ADD who understand the concept that you can play solitaire and still get 5 times as much work done as anybody else.

      So, if you play solitaire at work on your main PC where everybody can see, you're a dumbass who needs to be fired because what other horrible lapses of judgement are you going to inflict upon your employer?

      Get a laptop and go into a conference room, facing toward the door. Duh.

    44. Re:Terms of use by midnighttoadstool · · Score: 1
      Oh come on. The frickin' MAYOR is coming to your office. Not of Paducah, KY, but of New York City. He probably hasn't been there for three years. Don't you think you'd better make yourself a little more presentable?

      Maybe a little, but being sacked for under these circumstances is a long step into creating and advancing an environment of fear. You don't need death squads to create fear; bloombergs will do. Worst of all is that he's in charge of a whole city.

      In the west there are too many laws now that make us fear to tread. Traditonally it was the bad who upheld that role. In the past one might experience arbitary violence, now we can expect the same of the law

    45. Re:Terms of use by Martz · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ob. Bill Hicks Quote:

      'Hicks, how come you're not working.'
      I'd go, 'There's nothing to do.'
      'Well, you pretend like you're working.'
      'Well, why don't you pretend I'm working? Yeah, you get paid more than me, you fantasise. Pretend I'm mopping. Knock yourself out. I'll pretend they're buying stuff; we can close up. I'm the boss now, you're fired. How's that? I'm on a fucking roll. We're all millionaires and you're dick. I'm pretending shit, I'm wacky, I can't be stopped.'

      I don't know if I have the right attitude for the workplace.

    46. Re:Terms of use by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      Which is why they then ban "time wasting" items such as solitare and slashdot thinking it will increase productivity (it probobly wont though)

      That was my point - if they make your job suck by completely banning things they consider "time wasting" then you just won't care enough about your job any more to do the work. i.e. productivity goes _down_. If someone's doing a good job the way to get them to do more work is to offer bonuses, etc. rather than punishing them.

      Carrot and stick... Sadly many employers think the stick is the be-all and end-all and ignore the carrot.

    47. Re:Terms of use by BoomerSooner · · Score: 1

      So by your logic all auto's should be banned in new york since they can cause lung cancer via air pollution.

      There is not a right answer. Mind you I think if weed is illegal cigarettes and alcohol should definately be as well. Never had problems with a bunch of stoner dudes. Smoking alcoholics are a burden on society.

    48. Re:Terms of use by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      It's not really quicklaunch, I've removed the original quicklaunch and instead created three folders (applications, links to frequently accessed folders and games) that I told Windows to use as quicklaunch bars (right click->symbol bars->new symbol bar..., select the folder you wish to use).

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    49. Re:Terms of use by pekkak · · Score: 1

      [BLOCKQUOTE]Anybody caught doing something stupid when a VIP is in the room deserves what they get.[/BLOCKQUOTE] I beg to differ... no one deserves to get fired just because having a solitaire open while someone walks into the room, not unless your job involves being alert for invading Martians (sneaky ones, those) or such. Some bad looks, yes, maybe some yelling, but not getting fired. Some sense of proportion would be nice.

      --
      What are we going to do tomorrow night? The same thing we do every night, Pinky. Try to take over the world!
    50. Re:Terms of use by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1
      It's measuring with two sizes (if that's even a valid expression) if people -are- allowed to have their watercooler breaks, but aren't allowed to have a 'game-break'.
      What about smokers? I guess they must spend an extra hour per day away from their desks.
      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    51. Re:Terms of use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Playing games on your computer at work at any time other than lunch or before/after work hours is essentially saying, "I have no work to do and I have no interest in finding or doing any".

      As such I'd consider playing computer games during normal work hours as begging to be fired.

    52. Re:Terms of use by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      hmmm, reminds me of a guy that got fired a couple years ago.

      He was snoozing during a meeting when the visiting SVP showed up late and had to wake him up to get to his seat.

      But, he wasn't sleeping because he was lazy or incompotent. He was on-call that week and had been up all night fighting a fire. We had one of those "mandatory" all-hands meetings (yes, one of those) that morning and our boss didn't see fit to excuse him just because he was working all night (personally, I would have gone home at that point).

      All the mucky-mucks were flying in from the home office to give us their quarteryly song-and-dance rah, rah schpeil. Gerry showed up as things were getting started and sat himself in the back where he could lean back against the wall and rest for a bit to get though this 2&1/2 hour ordeal before he would have to return to his cube to no doubt fix another problem.

      Just as things were getting *really* interesting midway through the second hour (yawn), some visiting dignitary in a blue pinstripe suit shows up late, cracks some lame-ass joke about the airline being run by cave men, flashes a winning smile and tries to find a seat.

      Yup, he ran into Gerry who had gone into a coma from the droning presentation of corporate vision and maximizing shareholder value and exceeding customer expectations, blah, blah, blah. The SVP was trying to get to an empty seat in the back row and when he came to Gerry, he couldn't get past.

      Excuse me.
      Pardon me.
      *nudge*
      wha?
      Excuse me, I'd like to get by.
      um, ok, sorry...
      What's your name, son?
      Gerry.
      Gerry...
      Gerry Walters.
      Ok, Gerry Walters. Thank you.

      Well, surprise, surprise... Gerry was packing up his desk by the same time the next day. Sucked too because he was one of our better, harder working guys and we had to scramble to get by without him for quite some time.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    53. Re:Terms of use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I don't respect the mayor (or any "public servant") any more than any other human being.

      Why, do you?

    54. Re:Terms of use by Dare+nMc · · Score: 0

      > If use of this app is against policy why did IT leave it on the image?
      depending on the job of the person, it could be nearly impossible to lock down solitary, and still leave the computer useable for the intended task.

    55. Re:Terms of use by Krystlih · · Score: 1

      This is one of the major problems I have when working in a corperate environment. I understand all the rules about having a clean work area, and looking like you are busy when the big wig comes trotting through. But to me this once again is setting up a false image. That is what we live in today a world of false images. Nobody is perfect and its ashame that we are so pompas that we believe if we arent perfect we should at least act like we are perfect. Here is the way I look at it. If the guy was truely playing Solitare during his work hours then there is a problem, maybe with the employee but mostly a problem with management. Lets say for example that he's banned from playing solitare, if he isnt managed correctly do you honestly believe he isnt going to find something else to waste his time with. If I walked into a place and a worker was playing solitare I would question the management before the worker.

    56. Re:Terms of use by daikokatana · · Score: 1
      What about smokers? I guess they must spend an extra hour per day away from their desks.

      Very easy solution. Where I work, smoking is forbidden indoors, and if you want to go out and smoke, you need to badge. Since you left the building (and badged to get out), the minutes you're spending outdoors to smoke do not count for your work time.

      In order for a smoker to have his daily dose of poison, he/she needs to work longer hours than the others. Simple as that.

      --
      http://jcsnippets.atspace.com/ - a collection of Java & C# snippets
    57. Re:Terms of use by genner · · Score: 1

      This is why admins need to have basic coding skills. It's not that hard to write a search and destroy program to find sol.exe.

    58. Re:Terms of use by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      > So by your logic all auto's should be banned in new york since they
      > can cause lung cancer via air pollution

      Autos are an essential transportation facility without which the city would not function. Smoking...er, exactly what essential function does smoking provide, again?

      Chris Mattern.

    59. Re:Terms of use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean if he asks someone if you like your job you better say yes. Otherwise its onsite termination. He did that too but my guess is he had a good reason to do it. You dont double cross the CEO.

      I woulda said no, and then filed a wrongful termination lawsuit. Just because he's the CEO doesn't mean he can just fire people without good cause.

    60. Re:Terms of use by FinalCut · · Score: 1

      why would it be unfair? The guy was playing solitair while on the company clock. He wasn't hired to play solitaire he was hired to work. I'd fire him too because as far as I am concerned he is robbing his employer. It is no different than the sales clerk who puts her hand in the till.

      In the case of this guy who was playing when the mayor of NYC was in his office (or at least was playing just before the mayor arrived) he was both stealing time AND was incompetent at hiding it. He not only made himself look bad but his supervisor as well.

      They aren't making this guys job suck - they are making him do his job. It's a big difference. My company wants us to make sure we get 40 hours of billable time in each week. We aren't supposed to be playing games, surfing for porn, or anything else not work related when we are on the clock. Yet everyone likes working there.

      The real problem here is a lack of personal responsibility. I have read a variety of posts on here suggesting that the company is partly at fault for not removing the temptation. I didn't realize the company/government was hiring five year olds who need constant monitoring. Perhaps people need to take more responsibility for their inappropriate actions. Of course it's probably their parents fault for not loving them enough as kids or something. Nobody is ever to blame for their own behaviour anymore.

    61. Re:Terms of use by subterfuge · · Score: 1

      That is why they should have skilled IT admins on staff who can do such things.

      They should remove the games from the image they use for the desktops [before deployment]- if they are just banging out factory images they should all be fired.

      Or, they could do what many larger companies do: use third party tools that can monitor installed applications on the client and remove/block the items determined to be against policy. The company I work for is using CA's Unicenter [now DSM] suite: not free [or the best] but it does the job. If they are serious about this they should be serious about the IT staff that controls their network and about the tools they use to prevent staff wasting time using 'undesirable' software.

      I again offer my services if they need help getting this done.

      = : ^ \ >

    62. Re:Terms of use by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      why would it be unfair? The guy was playing solitair while on the company clock.

      Firing people is difficult - they have to have _really_ done something wrong. Basically unless the employee is guilty of gross misconduct (spending 5 minutes playing solitare really isn't gonna qualify as gross misconduct) the employer must perform some other disciplinary action first and only fire the employee if that didn't work.

      My company wants us to make sure we get 40 hours of billable time in each week. We aren't supposed to be playing games, surfing for porn, or anything else not work related when we are on the clock.

      This very much depends on what kind of job you're in - if the job involves a lot of brainwork then people _have_ to take breaks from it otherwsie they start making mistakes. Yeah, stop them from taking breaks and the _amount_ of work done may go up, but the _quality_ of the work will hit rock bottom.

      Perhaps people need to take more responsibility for their inappropriate actions.

      I agree entirely that people need to take responsibility for their own actions (and that was really the point of my post). However, firing someone for *one* minor mistake is over the top.

      Certainly here in the UK, employers don't fire people for something minor - it's crazy, you spend vast sums of money training someone and then fire them just like that without seeing if there is a more amicable solution to the problem? I dare say the amount of money spent getting his replacement up to speed is far going to outweigh the amount of money lost by someone spending 5 minutes playing solitare.

      Maybe it's different in the US - do employers really just want to be rid of a minor problem that bad that they won't try to _solve it_?

    63. Re:Terms of use by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      Before you spout-off about things you don't have the full details on, you might actually want to read the story.

      Solitare was up on his screen, he wasn't actively playing it. For all anyone knows, he could've been playing over lunch or on a coffee break.

      So before you make snap judgements about "stealing from his employer", maybe you should get some actual information.

      Yes, the guy should've been more aware of his surroundings when VIPs showed up

      No, the mayor shouldn't have been such a total dick. You don't encourage loyalty and hard work from employees by being an asshole. It's situations like these where one appreciates unions and their power to moderate management's knee-jerk over-reactions.

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    64. Re:Terms of use by tmortn · · Score: 1

      How can work history and his current work responsibilities at the time of the incident NOT be relevent issues to this firing? The whole problem with having solitare up is the assumption that it means he was not getting his work done because he was OBVIOUSLY doing something not tied to his work. Thus if he WAS getting it done and has a history of doing so then the fact the program was up is moot. Promote him or give him more work (and PAY him more if he is responsible for producing more than others at the same level). But don't fire him just becasue he might have done something that interfered with him doing his job. If your going to cut someones job out from under them becasue they might not have been doing their job... at least have the decency to make sure they were in fact NOT getting their job done.

      Rant on:

      on a side note...

      Why is it that everyone seems to think that the visit of a VIP should make for anything OTHER than a regular day of work? Providing a potempkin village for the VIPs only helps your bosses look better than they are. I am not saying that to do so isn't a wise choice in terms of reality. But the fact so many people here seem to take it for granted and to accept it surprises me. We bitch and moan and groan about clueless VIP PHBs and then merrily do everything in our power to act like everything is just peachy keen and running as smoothly as bad mexican diareah helped along by turbolax whenever they are around so that the LAST thing a VIP knows is what really happens on a regular basis and what REAL productivity looks like.

      Perhaps the reason VIP decisions often seem to be based on a perception rooted in some kind of twisted manager fantasy land instead of reality is that they are often so protected from reality by everyone. I am sure most folks here are familiar with the term GIGO. Well if all you ever feed up the ladder is garbage in order to make everything look better than it is is then the cumulative pile of shit that rolls up stream is going to result in decisions based on that garbage. Thus I often feel that we all wallow in our own GIGO hell for which ultimate responsibility starts at the lowest level. The lower levels are responsible for providing it, and the upper levels are responsible for asking for it. All in all plenty of blame to go around for all involved. The fact that it is an established cultural norm does NOT make it right. These kinds of things can and do change.

      Rant off:

      --
      I don't ask you to be me. I only ask you not expect me to be you.
    65. Re:Terms of use by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      I thought it was just the inside spaces. I've been to no-smoking bars & clubs, and let me be the first to say how very much more pleasant they are without the thick cloud of headache inducing lungvomit muscling its way into the olfactory organ and permeating the clothes with its wretched stink.

      Frankly, I'm at a loss as to why there weren't more non-smoking venues *before* the ban. Sadly, the town I'm currently in has no such ban, and all the watering holes have chosen to allow it. Sadly for them that is. I'm saving money.

      I agree that business owners should be able to make the choice for themselves, but you can't argue that a smoke-free workplace isn't more pleasant for the majority of workers. If NYC is banning smoking in large public spaces with good airflow, the yes, that is pretty rediculous.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    66. Re:Terms of use by Ekevu · · Score: 1

      "Man, who would have thought that working at Disneyland would be so rough?"
      ...Uncle Scrooge, anyone?

    67. Re:Terms of use by scottv67 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would have been termed if I told him I refuse to pick cigarette butts

      Dude, what's your fixation with cigarette butts? I work in I.T., make a *lot* more than $9/hr but I still do my part to keep the workplace clean. If I see something on the carpeted floor in our office area, I pick it up and throw it in the trash.

      When I am in one of our hospitals for a meeting or to fix something in one of the data centers, I still do my part to keep the place clean. Just like your employer, we provide a "service" to our "customers". And one of the things that they expect when they visit our facilities is that the place is clean.

      When I was in college (which was almost two decades ago - yikes!), I used to work at a "water park" for $3.50/hr. Yeah, we were expected to sweep up cigarette butts and other grunt work like that (just like your job). But I also noticed that the guys who owned the water park (who had more money than God) would also stop to pick up a cup, hamburger wrapper or cigarette butt. Hell, I saw one of the owners stop to pick up a nickel or dime once.

      You shouldn't look at your "cigarette butt" picking at some sort of punishment. Yeah, it may seem demeaning but as one of the employees of that organization, you are expected to pitch-in and make the place look nice. As I mentioned above, I do the same thing at my place and our customers come to us for a totally different reason. But they still expect the place to look nice. And they deserve it.

    68. Re:Terms of use by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      There's more of a compelling economic interest to allow cars than there is to allow cigarettes. If we banned cars, we'd do a lot of damage to people's livlihood. So we deal with the situation and there are laws to minimize the pollution done by cars, mandating catalytic converters and otherwise regulating emmissions.

      There is not a right answer.

      Maybe not in terms of ideology and formal logic, but some value systems produce healthier, happier communities than others. The best laws seek a balance between various interests.

      I'd be fine with seeing weed legalized (and taxed) since I don't think stoners are a danger to others. There's not really any rational reason not to. Of course, I don't think people should use the stuff, but you have to have a good reason to impinge on what people do in the privacy of their own homes.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    69. Re:Terms of use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gerry was packing up his desk by the same time the next day. Sucked too because he was one of our better, harder working guys and we had to scramble to get by without him for quite some time.

      At that point you and the rest of your coworks should have shown a little backbone and resigned also.

      Companies that let self-important pricks make such descisions need to be taught a lesson.

    70. Re:Terms of use by mattcasters · · Score: 1

      Chris, smokers are addicts. There is no point in arguing with them.
      They will come up with any argument to justify their habbit.

      --
      News about the Kettle Open Source project: on my blog
    71. Re:Terms of use by Asklepius+M.D. · · Score: 1

      I've had my share of DV's/VIP's and the like come through, and I can't recall a single time I faked working to impress them. If asked, I would list my accomplishments for the day and justify my "break". Sure I took some flak, but I wasn't fired, reprimanded, or written up. You know why? Because I made it a point to be damn good at my job. I enjoyed my work and did it well which made my supervisor, and his supervisor look good. I didn't have to defend my actions most of the time because my sup's would do it for me out of fear of losing a valuable asset. Sure I ran into the occasional political kiss@$$ who would try to hold me to the letter of the law.... it normally helped that I had read, understood, and remembered the same regulation he was throwing at me. There is usually a way to minimize the damage by manipulating the regs. Bureaucrats are easily manipulated. People who try to throw the book at you usually are trying to intimidate you and they often assume you can't read.

      --
      He who would be a man, must be a nonconformist. -- Emerson
    72. Re:Terms of use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm fine with laws that protect people from each other. I'm against laws that attempt to protect people from themselves. Seems simple enough to me.

      And I'm fine with that as long as my taxes aren't going to pay for things like medicare to pay for your diabetes or heart disease or whatever else you gave to yourself through your irresponsible eating/smoking/whatever habits.

    73. Re:Terms of use by raduf · · Score: 1

      Are you for real? Seriously, are you for real? Life sux man, you're damn lucky if you didn't find out yet. You have no ideea how bad this guy needs a job. Or how good this guy is at what he does, people usually don't find acceptable jobs the next day after quiting. Or even how the boss really is, i know i've met my share of good people who have one or two loose boards. Or, of course, if when firing those people theese were his only considerations. Let's see... what did i forget? Yeah, the pay, distance from work, coworkers, opportunity for profesional development, and again *the need to make money*. Double that if there is a SO. And actually knowing something about the GP would add more to the list.

      But of course... you think he should quit NOW so that you can feel good you made a statement. Life sux already man... let's not add more stupidity to it.

    74. Re:Terms of use by adamfranco · · Score: 1

      and tickets to Spamlot...

      Off topic, but I saw it last May; Spamalot was amazing!

      - Adam

      --
      "When ideology and theology couple, their offspring are not always bad but they are always blind." -- Bill Moyers
    75. Re:Terms of use by Bad+D.N.A. · · Score: 1

      Dude, you seriously need to take a chill pill. The guy was essentially bitching about his job. You don't need me to link to the endless /. Posts along the lines of "would you quit your good job for less money if it made you happier?"

      If the GP is some I'm-lucky-to-have-my-job-because-I'm-not-very-comp etent kind of guy then he should shut his trap and take it like a man. If he is a competent person then there ARE other jobs out there.

      I guess the problem here is the use of the word NOW?. As you should know what I meant by that is the dude should start NOW to look for another job. Obviously you don't quit until you have set your self up.

      Yes, I am for real. I do not think life "sux". Every time I have seen someone who is a "life sux" kind of person it's always been their choice (did not want to relocate, did not want to educate themselves further, did not etc...), basically it came down to I think I deserve a free-ride...(perhaps, as you suggest, I am damn lucky?).

      --
      "Truth is much too complicated to allow anything but approximations"
    76. Re:Terms of use by runderwo · · Score: 1
      "I don't think people should use the stuff"

      You misspelled "I would never use the stuff". Or do you really claim to know what is best for others?

    77. Re:Terms of use by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      I don't claim to have the right to use legal coersion to tell people what to do. But if I had kids, I wouldn't want them using marijuana. I wouldn't buy it for someone. I wouldn't encourage anyone to use it. There are exceptions, of course. Some people with ADD seem to benefit from it. Some people take it medicinally. But believing in freedom doesn't mean I have to give up my ideas of what is beneficial or harmful to others. If a person is an Epicurian and believes that pleasure is the ultimate goal in life, it's fair to say to him, if you care about him, "in the long run, your behavior will bring more pain than pleausre and is not consistant with the value that you place on feeling good." The decision is still his (or hers) of course.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    78. Re:Terms of use by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      And I'm fine with that as long as my taxes aren't going to pay for things like medicare to pay for your diabetes or heart disease or whatever else you gave to yourself through your irresponsible eating/smoking/whatever habits.

      Well, it's that or social security checks.
      Socialism. You're damned if they do, and you're damned if they don't.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    79. Re:Terms of use by raduf · · Score: 1


          Thanks for the chill pill.

      The problem wasn't with the word NOW. I guess if anything it was more the 5 Insightful mod, which meant lots of people agree with you. Lots of people rushing to give simple, obvious advice to an unknown, complicated problem. Of course this is the first thing you think about when reading the GP, it's just that actually saying it should take some consideration. And a more moderate tone.

          I reread the GP, and it doesn't look like unacceptable conditions. After all it's an amusement park and hesitating to buy icecream 'cause the icecream man looks busy talking on his cell is not really the feeling it's trying to create. That's about the conditions. About the fact that people were fired without good reason, that doesn't affect him unless he's fired himself. If job security is important, he might want to consider quitting, but in any case it's no hurry.

      Every time I have seen someone who is a "life sux" kind of person it's always been their choice (did not want to relocate, did not want to educate themselves further, did not etc...)

          You've never been asked if you want to buy a woman for 200 dollars, have you? And yes, i'm in a quite civilised country in Europe. Just not everybody gets to make the choices they want to make.

    80. Re:Terms of use by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      I agree with both of you.

      I made mistakes in the past and immaturity and lack of taking risks got me in my situation at my age. The good news is I dont have a wife or kids or anything to worry about. I do take it and realize that bad management is otu there. I have seen assholes as bosses and great bosses.

      I am conservative with entering new fields and I may try to do so again if more opportunities arise. But yes the idea of not buying ice cream if he looks busy is the reason. It sucks but if I say "Well I am in I.T so I can goof off" then the other employees will do the same. I think its about bosses with big ego's and perfectionists.

      As soon as I get me degree I am so out of here!

    81. Re:Terms of use by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Yes he can

      Florida is a right to work state. Federal laws need not apply or they are sideworked out. Got to love lobbying hu?

      By the way I worded that post poorly. He never asked me that personally. He did to someone else because he acted disrespectfully to some guests and didn't look happy. Someone who makes hardly anything does not have money to sue.

    82. Re:Terms of use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm fine with laws that protect people from each other. I'm against laws that attempt to protect people from themselves. Seems simple enough to me."

      Okay, but keep in mind that with any kind of social health care program we are all paying for the stuff people do to their bodies. Why should I be paying to treat someone's lung cancer that they gave themselves from smoking? As long as we have social health care, laws prohibiting people from doing stupid stuff to themselves are necessary to protect people from each other (economically, at least).

      People are free to do whatever they want to themselves, so long as they (or the govt. by proxy) don't ask me to pay for their mistakes.

    83. Re:Terms of use by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

      >write a search and destroy program to find sol.exe.

      and every other filename ending with .COM .SCR, .PIF, .BAT don't forget the xml, and java versions.

    84. Re:Terms of use by mibus · · Score: 1

      A related issue is the monthly limit on total bytes transferred with my cable company TOS. I wouldn't mind it, if only they provided a meter on their website somewhere where I could see how much I had left for the month. Without that, I am just guessing and hoping they don't get strict on me all of a sudden. I know I could build a system to track it myself using iptables - but haven't got around to it yet.

      My (DSL) ISP not only provides a web page to get at that information, plus historical data, broken down day-by-day if you want it, they also provide a means for mini-apps (systray apps, panel apps, etc.) to access it if you ask them nicely enough. (There are a number of GPL'd apps, I'd say it's worked well for them).

      With everything they do, I consider them a good "geek's ISP" for my area.

    85. Re:Terms of use by gswallow · · Score: 1

      Heh. That reminds me of the time I was driving 115 mph on the Tri-state (Chicago) tollway drifting from the hammer lane to the right lane (five separate lanes), *while* noticing the Illinois state trooper sitting in the middle of the road speed trapping.

      I didn't even hit the brakes -- what was the point? Amazingly, he didn't budge.

      And somehow every speeding ticket I've ever gotten was for 74 or below.

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of saying "nice doggy" until you can find a rock.
    86. Re:Terms of use by wpanderson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, yes, yes! If there is a local "no games" policy, the normally pre-installed games such as Solitaire should and must be removed. Who cares that one guy played a game on his lunch break? The local IT bods should be fired for distributing games to all their workstations :)

      --
      neuro at well dot com (when I post, it's my opinions, no-one elses)
    87. Re:Terms of use by raduf · · Score: 1


            Good luck!

    88. Re:Terms of use by SerenaStargazer · · Score: 1

      I can relate to the part about the mayor not having a clue what the guy does. I'm an insights consultant for an insurance company, and among other things, I get paid to analyse the news. So I'm sometimes sitting at my desk reading the newspaper - which is what I'm paid to do - with a stack of other papers on my desk, possibly even with a cup of coffee to keep me awake, and sometimes people who don't have a clue about my job will make some comment about how I'm "taking it easy". Because all they see is some woman drinking coffee and reading the paper.

      --
      "The reason for this is not understandable to the human mind." - IT helpdesk assistant
    89. Re:Terms of use by CustomDesigned · · Score: 1

      When your work involves staring at the screen all day, your break should certainly not involve the same. I recommend getting some good cubicle toys. These same employers who had me remove computer games, had no problem with desk toys (swinging balls, swinging magnets, hand exercisers, etc).

    90. Re:Terms of use by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1

      A perfect solution (at least till someone brings a human rights suit). Nonetheless, most people will see that as the exception, rather than the rule. It's certainly been a long while since I've worked anywhere that had formal clocking in and out.

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    91. Re:Terms of use by lazyl · · Score: 1

      I'm fine with laws that protect people from each other. I'm against laws that attempt to protect people from themselves. Seems simple enough to me.

      I don't think it's quite so black and white. Nothing happens in a vacuum. Fast food corporations do everything within thier power to encourage people to eat unhealthy portions of thier food.

      --
      Aw crap, ninjas!
    92. Re:Terms of use by FinalCut · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding me? Do you really believe this guy wasn't playing Solitaire on the clock? I don't.

      Also, the guy who was fired was a state employee in Albany, not a NYC employee. Perhaps you should read the article instead of telling me to.

      Bloomberg didn't fire the guy. However, his irresponsible behaviour in front of Bloomberg clearly contributed to his firing. He was let go as part of general cutbacks. Perhaps this wasn't the first time he was caught with a game running during business hours.

      Just to be safe here I'm going to let you know I'm injecting sarcasm:
      Wait, I figured it out. I'm not sympathetic enough with the common working man. His ordeal of a deskjob is so difficult that he must spend time playing solitaire to get by. Sure he wasnt hired to play games - but that's the companies fault for not being understanding enough.
      : END sarcasm

      gimme a break. The linked article was clearly written with a bias in favor of the "victimized" govt employee. It's popular to bash the politician and ignore the fact that this guy was being irresponsible. If this "was" his first offense, sure firing was harsh. But if not then firing was totally inline. Unless you just like to pretend that it was purely bad luck that Solitaire was on his screen at that moment. Pesonally, I don't.

    93. Re:Terms of use by runderwo · · Score: 1
      But believing in freedom doesn't mean I have to give up my ideas of what is beneficial or harmful to others...the decision is still his (or hers) of course.
      Thank you, that was the answer I was hoping for - that you believe taking your advice on the matter is optional, and not the job of government or any other authority to enforce.

      By the way, given the physically benign nature of cannabis, and if you don't have a philosophical issue with mind-altering substances, it is a rational decision to experiment with it - in secrecy due to the current political stigma - in order to determine whether its effects on your individual psyche bring you a net benefit.

      Without firsthand experience, to paraphrase a more eloquent fellow, telling someone else that marijuana use is a handicap is "like a nun preaching about the evils of sex". And your credibility is demolished when your argument accidentally incorporates elements that are either slanted by propaganda or just plain false - a situation that is difficult to avoid when you are relying on third parties for such information.

      But that's just my opinion/rant. Nothing personal and I'm not claiming you do any of the above.

    94. Re:Terms of use by xdc · · Score: 1

      Oh, I see. I did that too, for awhile, but stopped once I switched to using keyboard shortcuts.

  3. strangely quiet by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 5, Funny

    Topic hitting close to home - or am I really first?

    1. Re:strangely quiet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. Close, but no dice.

  4. Seriously, who doesn't do this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is it that yakking at the water cooler (and disturbing others, thank you very little) is acceptable but playing games on a computer isn't?

    1. Re:Seriously, who doesn't do this? by dlasley · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because all too often the modern workplace focuses more on appearance, propriety, and popularity - and less on true productivity and a healthy, relaxed environment.

      I'm just amazed that Bloomberg has managed to completely revitalize the lower east side and stomp out crime in all the boroughs, and now has enough time on his hands to wander around snooping on his staff, looking for the evil sol.exe.

      &laz;

      --
      when it rains, it gets real soggy. when it pours, i'm under the tap just _waiting_ for the joy
  5. Good! by exoir · · Score: 0

    Ya right. Thats his side of the story. That was probablily the last straw, you gottaa be a f*up to lose a gov job.

    1. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps.. But the story seems plausible. Head boss walks past your computer, sees an icon for solitaire, or worse, the game open, and wants who ever's responsible to be "let go". Who the hell's going to argue with that? Seriously?

    2. Re:Good! by shawb · · Score: 1

      I think what Bloomberg is saying is you better damn well be sure that you are aware enough of what's going on in your surroundings to not be caught playing solitaire on work time by THE MAYOR OF NEW YORK. What I love is the whole sympathy ploy the article is pushing "employee for six years" "father of a toddler" etc etc etc. And like "but everyone else does it" is really anything approaching an excuse.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    3. Re:Good! by Catbeller · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Who the hell's going to argue with that? Seriously?Who the hell's going to argue with that? Seriously?"

      Me.

      I guess I'm unusual.

      Terry Pratchett once observed that cows are herded by men that, if the cows every thought about it, the cows could convert into a damp smear on the ground in two seconds.

      But the cows never think about it. They are cows. Rebellion never crosses their minds, so they let the pink monkeys herd them into slaughterhouses.

      (plaitive tone) why are we all cows? people died for over a hundred years to create unions so that employers couldn't treat people like peons on a feudal estate. Why do you hate yourselves so much?

    4. Re:Good! by heinousjay · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, they fought for the right to form unions so they wouldn't have to working physically backbreaking jobs 14 hours a day seven days a week for a pittance. Nobody died to get the right to slack off in front of the bossman, in lieu of performing their cushy duties.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    5. Re:Good! by sesshomaru · · Score: 1
      To understand this, you have to go back to what [the] young brother here referred to as the house Negro and the field Negro -- back during slavery. There was two kinds of slaves. There was the house Negro and the field Negro. The house Negroes - they lived in the house with master, they dressed pretty good, they ate good 'cause they ate his food -- what he left. They lived in the attic or the basement, but still they lived near the master; and they loved their master more than the master loved himself. They would give their life to save the master's house quicker than the master would. The house Negro, if the master said, "We got a good house here," the house Negro would say, "Yeah, we got a good house here." Whenever the master said "we," he said "we." That's how you can tell a house Negro.

      If the master's house caught on fire, the house Negro would fight harder to put the blaze out than the master would. If the master got sick, the house Negro would say, "What's the matter, boss, we sick?" We sick! He identified himself with his master more than his master identified with himself. And if you came to the house Negro and said, "Let's run away, let's escape, let's separate," the house Negro would look at you and say, "Man, you crazy. What you mean, separate? Where is there a better house than this? Where can I wear better clothes than this? Where can I eat better food than this?" That was that house Negro. In those days he was called a "house nigger." And that's what we call him today, because we've still got some house niggers running around here. -- Malcolm X: "Message To The Grass Roots"

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
  6. Not something to worry about by Kohath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you can get fired for playing solitaire, then you can (and most likely will) get fired for anything. Some employers randomly fire people. It's unfortunate. Solitaire is just an excuse though. Excuses are easy to find.

    1. Re:Not something to worry about by rob_squared · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Most employers also try to fire someone because they aren't liked, or if they are perceved as a liability to the company. And let me explain what that means.

      There is a person at a company I work for, that gets the mandatory levels of productivity needed to keep the job. They are also very outspoken about company issues, which disagree with the current practices (union and so on). So every time he gets audited (monthly process) they purposefully find his worst interactions in the hopes that he'll be below standard and they can fire him. Some people didn't believe this so he purposefully made a small mistake in one interaction and wrote down the ID of that interaction. The next month, that was the one audited. This has been shown more than once, and they're just waiting for an "approved" reason to terminate employment.

      This kind of discrimination does exist, they just hide it behind protocol and procedure.

      --
      I don't get it.
    2. Re:Not something to worry about by lahvak · · Score: 1

      That's a good point. I am pretty sure that if he was a valuable employee, they would just tell him the cut the playing time down. They were going to fire him anyway, and this was just an excuse. A stupid one, I must say. Or it may well be some office politics, he got into somebodys way or something.

      --
      AccountKiller
    3. Re:Not something to worry about by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Where I work his boss then would have been terminated. If the upper guys say someone is termed then you dont question it.

      Alot the of the real world works this way and you are not qualified to even talk to a CFO or CEO if they make such a decision.

    4. Re:Not something to worry about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he were a valuable employee, I would hope they'd pay him more than $27,000/year

    5. Re:Not something to worry about by modecx · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I used to work at a print shop. The management didn't like the receiving guy, so they had their headhunters watch him and double check everything he did, and I hear that they eventually fired him for miscounting a couple of sheets of decal material out of thousands--principally because one of the headhunters was distracting him in the first place!

      Long story short, he got a nice settlement, the headhunter got fired as part of the deal, and the company is now doing it's best to go belly-up... Good for him, I think, because they sure gave him shit. But I guess that's what you get when you're so inept that you have to hire someone to run your company for you.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    6. Re:Not something to worry about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You guys are messed up. I wouldn't want any of you slackers working for me. This is whats wrong with America and why the Japanese are kicking our tails in the automotive sector... and why the Indians are getting our outsourcing money. You get paid to work for 8 hours - work it. If you smoke, the time it takes you to

      A) Get up from your desk and walk outside
      B) Stop to BS 3 times on the way to smoke
      C) Go take a whiz

      is your time, not the company's time.

      If you have to take a 15 minute break to clear your head... thats your issue. I'm sure its not in your job description that you have to clear your head once every two hours.

      The fact that anyone presumes that they should be afforded the time by the company to do things that they _WANT_ to do is absolutely silly.

      With all that said, I can't say that the guy wasn't off-the-clock, but the moron factor of leaving it up when the mayor is approaching is enough reason alone to fire him IMHO - kind of like Darwinian Evolution in employment.

    7. Re:Not something to worry about by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      If a manager wanted to get rid of you enough, they could just make you quit. (Warning: Some very evil stuff in that link.)

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    8. Re:Not something to worry about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Working is NOT a right. It's a privilege. Employers should be able to fire you if they don't feel you are doing the job they hired you to do.

    9. Re:Not something to worry about by Limecron · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sure there were also political motivations that would not be present in a normal corporate environment.

      If you work in a public office, you've got people coming in and out all day, many of which are ordinary citizens. All it takes is one person to notice and say, "Oh, I am paying for that guy to play Solitaire." Something like that may come out against you in an news article or in your re-election campaign.

      So yes, he looks like an asshole, but then again, he also looks like he's stongly protecting the use of NYC's tax payers' money. Of course, neither, either or both may be true. :)

    10. Re:Not something to worry about by Theatetus · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I'm sure its not in your job description that you have to clear your head once every two hours.

      No, Ayn Rand, it's not in your job description, but it's precisely in almost every state's labor laws.

      --
      All's true that is mistrusted
    11. Re:Not something to worry about by xenocide2 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      "Insightful"? What the fuck. The above example is a situation in which the company (aka THE EMPLOYER) has a performance guideline for employees, and the manager (aka the EMPLOYER's PETTY MINION) has a personal grievance with the emloyee and is cherry picking examples. They haven't come up with a good excuse (aka you arent "doing the job they hired you to do") implies that he's actually doing his job quite well, despite the reviewer's best efforts to demonstrate otherwise.

      Working might not be a right. But firing people you don't like from a company you also work for wouldn't a right either. I suggest you go back to Libertarian school and study hard this time.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    12. Re:Not something to worry about by Idarubicin · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Working is NOT a right. It's a privilege. Employers should be able to fire you if they don't feel you are doing the job they hired you to do.

      The grandparent poster was talking about someone who was doing the job he was hired to do.

      Employees and employers both have extensive rights and responsibilities that are enshrined in job descriptions, employments contracts, and state and federal laws. Working isn't a right or a privilege--it's a mutually beneficial arrangement extensively regulated by contract and labour law.

      An employee who complains because the employer isn't holding up their end of the contractual or legal obligations shouldn't face sanctions (unfair evaluation practices as described by the grandparent poster, for instance).

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    13. Re:Not something to worry about by assassinator42 · · Score: 1

      Linking to a Geocities page....from Slashdot. How long did that last, 2 minutes or so?

    14. Re:Not something to worry about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Owning or operating a company is NOT a right. It's a privilege. The people should be able to revoke the charter of any company if they don't feel the company is treating the employees decently.

    15. Re:Not something to worry about by caller9 · · Score: 1

      What self respecting IT person left sol.exe on the machine in the first place? That's what IT does, we protect idiots from themselves and other idiots.

      That is sadly the definition of IT: Use off the shelf components to build a business critical system that is efficient and trustworthy, build in-house widgets if you're innovating, keep the users from drooling on the keyboards, save money and speed things up at any earliest convenience for little thanks....upgrade to the next major version of * and start over. It's that simple (laff).

      But seriously, the guy that's playing solitare "occasionally" and only according to some fairy tale regulations that secretarys made up years ago is completely full of shit. Especially if his dumbass happens to be playing it the day he meets the damn mayor. I know a bit about mayors, though elected, they still are the boss of something external to the city and have experience with dumbass lazy fuckers. This guy earned his pink slip.

      What kind of train of thought was involved here?...Oh I abuse company resources...but only on my breaks and other odd time intervals that Suzy in finance said would probably ok...because my job is stressful and I have to totally think like constantly...durr. No quarter.

    16. Re:Not something to worry about by Profound · · Score: 1

      Eating is NOT a right. It's a privilege.

    17. Re:Not something to worry about by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      I'll agree with that, so long as the employees can be held to a much higher standard than is common. Not to get all spiderman on you, but if you want to invest great power, that comes along only with great responsibility.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    18. Re:Not something to worry about by epee1221 · · Score: 1

      No guarantees that they would pay him what he's worth.

      --
      "The use-mention distinction" is not "enforced here."
    19. Re:Not something to worry about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You guys are messed up. I wouldn't want any of you slackers working for me.

      The thought that a craven, cowardly nobody like yourself would ever reach a point in life to have employees is utterly hilarious.

      But keep telling us how you'd run your fake company!

    20. Re:Not something to worry about by cyber-vandal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Working is a transaction between an employer and an employee. Workers are not slaves and should not be treated as such. Just find another job is such a cop out, what if all jobs in a particular field suck, employers should have to conform to standards too, they shouldn't just act as if the employee is a possession of the company.

    21. Re:Not something to worry about by disntrstd · · Score: 0

      "Working is NOT a right. It's a privilege," said the plantation owner to the slave.

    22. Re:Not something to worry about by Ihlosi · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Working is NOT a right. It's a privilege.



      No, it is neither. It is merely the matter of a contract between two parties.

    23. Re:Not something to worry about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This goes on all the time. There was a woman at my work who got along fine as a temp and was hired full time. Then she started coming in whenever she wanted. Her start time was 7 and she would show up anywhere between 7:30 and 8:30. Everyone was pissed because this went on for a month or two before management stepped in. After they spoke with her, instead of changing her habit, she started manipulating the time clock system, which was basically an honor system (if you forgot to swipe your badge you could manually fill in your time on paper. not meant for everyday use, but again she took advantage). When she started taking 1 and 2 hour lunches and only filling out the sheet for half an hour, I stepped in (I'm the IT admin)monitored her behavior and email activity for 2 weeks and gave evidence of breach of contract to the president of the company, she was fired the next day. The point is you don't want to piss off people where you work. If your co-workers hate you its only a matter of time. Of course this woman was useless anyway, but hey, useless people need jobs too. She could have stayed without the lying.

    24. Re:Not something to worry about by MaxwellStreet · · Score: 1

      Your reasoning is invalid for any job that involves any sort of thinking at all.

      My employer pays me to do a job - in my case, write software. They don't pay me to tap code into a computer for 8 hours on the days of their choosing - they pay me to create something useful for them.

      The 8 hours I'm scheduled to be there makes for a nice convenient schedule where I'm available to them for meetings, questions, reviews of what I'm doing, etc. - but in no way am I being paid to warm a chair from 8 to 5 with an hour off for lunch. I'm getting paid to build stuff for them.

      It's not a subtle distinction.

      Me? I consider it a professional duty to build them the best software I am able to, subject to the projects' constraints (delivery date, resources allocated, etc.) My ethics prevent me from non-project-related web surfing or playing games on their computers; which conveniently lands me well on the safe side of their terms-of-use policies. I can do these things at home on my own time.

      Those are my ethics though - I think (as do many others here) that spending a moment or two doing something unrelated to work (non-porn, non-gambling surfing, for example) can actually help reduce the daily grinding atmosphere which can ultimately -hurt- the effort to produce useful stuff for the company.

      I also believe that the issue of outsourcing is far more complex than your naive assessment that we're all soft slackers at work.

    25. Re:Not something to worry about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most states do not like "contracts" between employees and employers. It is a "free-will" employment which means that both sides can walk away at any time.

    26. Re:Not something to worry about by deesine · · Score: 1

      "Free-will" employment is a type of contract, albeit a more informal one. You agree to workX, they agree to payX.

      --
      damaged by dogma
    27. Re:Not something to worry about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spamming /. is not a right, it's a privilege.

    28. Re:Not something to worry about by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      that site is a bunch of rambling bullshit and is a rats nest of links.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    29. Re:Not something to worry about by battlesquid · · Score: 1

      Isn't it more like a necessity? I wouldn't consider it a right or privilege.

    30. Re:Not something to worry about by runderwo · · Score: 1

      What state forces employers to accomodate non-medical drug use on the job? Give me a break, you haven't a clue what you are talking about.

    31. Re:Not something to worry about by Theatetus · · Score: 1

      As far as I know all 54 states and territories require a 10 minute break every 2 hours without clocking out (this is for hourly employees; for exempt employees things start to vary a lot more by state). Whether or not you choose to use that to smoke is up to you.

      --
      All's true that is mistrusted
    32. Re:Not something to worry about by PaganRitual · · Score: 1

      Well it's a privilege I'm prepared to pass up on, thanks. Now, pass me this weeks lotto numbers please.

    33. Re:Not something to worry about by runderwo · · Score: 1

      Your reply says nothing leading me to believe that employers are forced to allow employees to smoke during that break, or at any other time while on the clock.

  7. ROFL, the things by buffer-overflowed · · Score: 1, Troll

    that get posted to the front page of slashdot.

    In other news, earth is round.

    --
    The key to the enjoyment of pop music is to replace any instance of "love" with "C.H.U.D."
  8. So? by missing000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Really now, don't you know that what you do at work WITH COMPANY RESOURCES is up to the (shock) COMPANY?

    1. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pack up your desk, you're fired

    2. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Of course. Their computers, their rules.

      However, one could make the argument that, since the game was installed, it was 'approved' for use....

    3. Re:So? by phasm42 · · Score: 1

      Sure, and I hope he doesn't get his job back, so that Bloomberg sends a clear message that he's an asshole. Creating a harsh work environment will not be beneficial in the long run.

      --
      "No one likes working in a hamster wheel, and your shop smells of cedar shavings from here." - TaleSpinner
    4. Re:So? by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The problem isn't that it's not within their rights (in my state, we have at-will employment and you can be fired for damn near anything). The problem is that some employers fail to recognize that eight full hours of productivity isn't a realistic goal. In this case, he claims to use solitaire for a "quick distraction." When I'm stuck on a problem, I take a walk, play a game of Sudoku, or check Slashdot. Sometimes it's a change of scenery that refreshes me. Other times its simply a change of perspective. In either case, it's important to realize that any employee who consistently claims to be productive for 100% of his time is lying.

      I've worked for employers that didn't understand this. Burnout and turnover rates were astonishingly high. Meanwhile, I've worked for employers that recognized the value of this kind of freedom/flexibility. They also realized the non-value of an employee that needs to get away.

      Solitaire/minesweeper/Sudoku or the occasional "why don't you go home early" often translates to a refreshed and more productive employee tomorrow.

    5. Re:So? by Bacon+Bits · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Indeed. They installed the solitare software, then, didn't they? They provided the software, and the required rights to use it.

      It's akin to giving a deck of cards to every employee as they are hired and then firing anybody who uses them at work.

      --
      The road to tyranny has always been paved with claims of necessity.
    6. Re:So? by GroeFaZ · · Score: 1

      No shock at all. However, if what the guy said about how few time he spent playing and how it helped him getting his work done was true, then the lesson to be learned here is that companies sholdn't be so short-sighted about what their employees do on comany time and resources. If the company's net gain in productivity is non-negative when people do non-work-related stuff, then by all means, let them do it and let them do it as long as they want. Do I have to say "Google" to get across the point?

      Sure you can fire someone because you caught him playing Solitaire for 5 minutes. But if those 5 minutes helped this guy getting an additional 30 minutes of work done, work that he wouldn't have done without the short distraction, then it's just plain stupid to fire him.

      --
      The grass is always greener on the other side of the light cone.
    7. Re:So? by BewireNomali · · Score: 1

      the article said bloomberg was going around with his photographer. This wasn't just a case of catching the guy playing solitare. It was more like catching him playing solitaire while an "inspection" was going on - or a tour, or whatever. Timing was the issue here.

      I freelance and run my own business. It's harrowing - constantly making sure my next client(s) is/are on hand, but nothing beats not having to deal with lame bosses.

      --
      un burrito me trampeó.
    8. Re:So? by fermion · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The issue is not that the company has a right to determine the employee can and can't do at work, at least to a degree. The issue is the companies inability to manage resources. I have often said a big problem with MS Windows is it's inability to install an OS suitable for business use. Why do we need solitaire, minesweeper, and media cores on a machine that will be used to run billing software, for instance?

      The bottom line is that if a company does not want an employee to use a resource, then they company should not supply the resource, or limit the use. For instance, reading ponography at work is probably also frowned upon, but would a company have a case if it provided that SWANK in the library, and then fired employees that chose to utilize it?

      Now, one might say that employers provide the internet, and that can be used for ponography. The thing is the employer does not actually provide the ponography/ In fact, if the employer was smart, filters would in place to limit access to these sites, and employees who tried to circumvent the filters could then be fired.

      In the end firing this guy is like firing a guy who picked up $10 from the ground. Sure one could say it was theft, but it might also be entrapment. Hiring and trainine employees cost a lot of money, and one does not fire them friviously. Unless, of course, one is borrow and spend republican.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    9. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Solitaire game WAS provided by the company. If they did not want him playing it, then they shouldn't of made it available. The company really can't complain about a resource they provided to all employees that gets used.

    10. Re:So? by BigBuckHunter · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      The problem is that some employers fail to recognize that eight full hours of productivity isn't a realistic goal

      You've got to be F'ing kidding me! With a work ethic like that, it's no wonder the bubble burst. I'd love to see your resume, and whether or not you've held a solid job within the past 8 years.

      BBH

    11. Re:So? by MrNougat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And what difference does it make if you break for solitaire once in a while, as long as you're getting done what you need to get done? I know that, overall, I am most productive when I bust ass for an hour or two, then take fifteen or twenty screwing off and doing whatever I want, then getting back to it for an hour or two. When I'm focused, I'm focused really hard, and I can't keep that up forever. And I can't figure out how to focus less hard, either.

      This worked better when I was in more of an office setting. Now I'm doing field service, and even though I know I need a break, I can't let the client see me walk away from their BSODed server to go have a smoke and play Bejeweled -- even though I know that's just what I need to get a better perspective on the issue at hand. This has happened once already, recently, and I ended up chasing my tail for four hours, with a headache to boot. I should have just taken the fifteen minutes.

      --
      Web 2.0 == Giant Blogspam Circle Jerk
    12. Re:So? by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

      Have you ever played chess for 8 hours straight?

      There's a kind of intensity in programming that will make you wish you were playing chess.

      I know I put in about 1 to 2 hours of programming per day and 6-7 hours going to meetings, talking to people, writing silly things on slashdot, reading, etc.

      Now, some people will say: You're slacking... Heck, I don't mind. But I tell you, in that 1-2 hours, they get their money's worth for the entire day of pay. And they know that, so they leave me be.

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    13. Re:So? by EdipisReks · · Score: 1

      even your idol, Iron Joe Stalin, took a cigarette break every once in a while.

    14. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had both sides of the spectrum when it comes to employers. I think just about any reader here that does any sort of design (be it programming, networks, hardware, even creative design) knows damn well that the most important part of the job only takes 20% of the time, while the other 80% of the time is spent trying to get worked up to get the 20% done. I can't just sit down and "do it", that's not how it works. My last 2 employers both knew my job well enough that they had no problem with me reading slashdot, reading the news, or just out right leaving the office for an hour to walk around or visit Starbucks. But that's probably because I got my job done damn well, and they wanted me around.

      My work environment was pretty lenient to say the least. They weren't strict with my punch-in/out times, but then I felt obligated to punch out a bit early, and then continue working if I felt I owed it. It worked for us, I got promotions, but I did work within common-sense limits. I wouldn't take off for an hour when I had a meeting coming up (some people did this), or doze off when we knew the head honcho was coming. Using common sense seems to take care of most issues.

      But I've also been less fortunate. One former employer couldn't give a ratts ass about performance, but wanted me to be in on time sharp, and be productive the whole time. I wasn't (couldn't), and got a pay cut. Needless to say, I left the company. Alot of other people left too, and this company is no longer in business.

      2 cents.

    15. Re:So? by Section_Ei8ht · · Score: 1

      "Solitaire/minesweeper/Sudoku or the occasional "why don't you go home early" often translates to a refreshed and more productive employee tomorrow." So true. I'm lucky enough to have a boss that realizes this to the point where him and myself play a round of Worms 2 at least once a week, and we've never missed a deadline for an project.

    16. Re:So? by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

      Company? Wasn't it a taxpayer-funded workplace?

    17. Re:So? by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      Where is Windows "inability" to support the intstallation of a business computer? You simply select Messenger, Games, Media Player and click Remove.

      Is Linux unable to be a business OS because on the distro's installation menu it offers you games and programs like fortune?

    18. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      However, one could make the argument that, since the game was installed, it was 'approved' for use...

      Format is still on my work PC. Does that mean I'm allowed to delete data with it? Don't be fucking ridiculous.



    19. Re:So? by squidguy · · Score: 1

      big problem with MS Windows is it's inability to install an OS suitable for business use. Why do we need solitaire, minesweeper, and media cores on a machine that will be used to run billing software, for instance?

      Excellent point. These have no place in the workspace...nor does AIM, MSN or Yahoo IM. Solution: if doing mass deployments install from an image where these useless items have been removed. If a single install, take 30 seconds and launch the add/remove windows components applet and deselect/remove this garbage.
      And for the Linux fans who will tout this as a significant Windows flaw, there is a similar process during the install routine. Don't select them. Yes, Fedora Core (as an example) lets you remove Tux Racer as part of the install process, but if you go with the workstation default...

    20. Re:So? by drsmithy · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I have often said a big problem with MS Windows is it's inability to install an OS suitable for business use. Why do we need solitaire, minesweeper, and media cores on a machine that will be used to run billing software, for instance?

      It is so trivially easy to remove or disable access to this sort of software, that it boggles the mind anyone would even consider trying to make an issue out of it.

    21. Re:So? by cammoblammo · · Score: 1
      Format is still on my work PC. Does that mean I'm allowed to delete data with it?

      Well, if users are given administrative privileges somebody's asking for trouble.

      --

      Cogito, ergo sig.

    22. Re:So? by Archtech · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the classic story of the highly-paid, well qualified engineer who was sitting at his desk with his feet up and his eyes closed one day, thinking through the design approach needed for a complex new chip. (This was a long time ago, when human beings had some direct influence in these matters).

      Along comes the Big Boss and tells him to "get on with your work and stop sleeping on the job". So the engineer tells him, "I am working hard doing the work you hired me for, which most people can't even begin to do. I'm doing one of the most difficult kinds of work: creative thinking".

      The Boss' reply? "Can't you do that at home?"

      --
      I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
    23. Re:So? by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

      I can only guess they are non-union in NY. Getting fired for something like that around here would cause a lot of trouble.

      Though when Kwame first got into office he did fire a round of people because they took an extra long lunch and stuff like that. Then proceeded to do stuff like that himself...

      I guess the favor goes both ways. While the mayor is popular he may get away with that, but while he is not he will face lots of trouble. Damn shame since the union should be behind employees regardless of the popularity of the mayor.

  9. only 27k? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    After 6 years on the job. Sounds like he was already pwned

    1. Re:only 27k? by jcr · · Score: 1

      In New York, no less. Where they pay union janitors in the school system over $80K, and can't even fire them if the don't show up for weeks on end.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    2. Re:only 27k? by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      In New York, no less. Where they pay union janitors in the school system over $80K

      And pay $27k a year (or less!) to teachers.

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

  10. Easy for Bloomberg to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of Bloomberg's job consists of what in most jobs would count as taking a break (shaking hands, taking photos and telling people what he thinks).

  11. Bloomberg thus joins the ranks by Perp+Atuitie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    of the rest of the undeserving rich who haven't the slightest clue about how work gets done.

    1. Re:Bloomberg thus joins the ranks by swilde23 · · Score: 1

      Is there some top secret "solitaire code" that no one has told me about? One that performs your work for you? I guess I didn't get the memo.

      --
      There are 10 types of people in the world. Those that understand this sig, and those that beat up people who do.
    2. Re:Bloomberg thus joins the ranks by LennyDotCom · · Score: 1, Informative

      Udeserving rich?

      Michael R. Bloomberg is the 108th Mayor of the City of New York. He was born on February 14, 1942 to middle class parents in Medford, Massachusetts, where his father was the bookkeeper at a local dairy. Mayor Bloomberg's thirst for information and fascination with technology was evident at an early age, and led him to Johns Hopkins University, where he parked cars and took out loans to finance his education. After his college graduation, he gained an MBA from Harvard and in the summer of 1966, he was hired by Salomon Brothers to work on Wall Street.

      Your just a looser who is jelous of someone that worked thier way to the top

      --
      http://Lenny.com
    3. Re:Bloomberg thus joins the ranks by Siridar · · Score: 0

      In the win3.1 days, XYZZY used to be the code for minesweeper...dunno about solitaire. I remember a pal of mine had a program that came with his soundcard (SBPro?) that would read the cards out for you...even the face-down ones.

    4. Re:Bloomberg thus joins the ranks by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      Right on!

      It is the rich folks who have no idea how to accomplish anything, and the Joe's making $13/hr (in New York) who are the brilliant ones who should run the companies.

      If they really want top notch, they should go down to the homeless shelters.

      I wish the man wouldn't keep us down.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    5. Re:Bloomberg thus joins the ranks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He may be a looser but you might want to loosen up a bit yourself.

    6. Re:Bloomberg thus joins the ranks by LennyDotCom · · Score: 1

      at least I'm not an anonymous coward ;-)

      --
      http://Lenny.com
    7. Re:Bloomberg thus joins the ranks by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      They should just take a page from the Klingon Book of Business.

      Boss acting dishonorable? Rise up, slay him, and take command of the men.

    8. Re:Bloomberg thus joins the ranks by bluprint · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You don't understand. The term "rich" no longer has anything to do with wealth. It's simply a term people throw around that means "someone who I think for some misguided reason should be treated badly or differently".

      And to the GP, you will find if you pay attention, that most rich people who's names you know have worked very hard.

      --
      A modern day witchhunt.
    9. Re:Bloomberg thus joins the ranks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah that's because most of the rich people who didn't work hard usually try to stay out of the limelight.

    10. Re:Bloomberg thus joins the ranks by swimmar132 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Your just a looser who is jelous of someone that worked thier way to the top Jesus Christ. Grammatical and spelling standards sure have gone down around here. You forgot the fucking period, idiot.

    11. Re:Bloomberg thus joins the ranks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s/rich/poor/

    12. Re:Bloomberg thus joins the ranks by node+3 · · Score: 1

      You don't understand. The term "rich" no longer has anything to do with wealth. It's simply a term people throw around that means "someone who I think for some misguided reason should be treated badly or differently".

      No, they still mean "rich" as in "have lots of money".

      And to the GP, you will find if you pay attention, that most rich people who's names you know have worked very hard.

      "Worked very hard"? You mean, 12 hours a day in a coal mine? 18 hours a day driving a truck? At the shipyards? In the hot sun all day? Probably not.

      Yes, they worked hard(ish), but it wasn't the hard work that got them the money, it was the type of work they had, and many of them don't actually have to work all that hard, or perform all that well, to make their millions.

      There's nothing wrong with being rich. What raises people's ire about the rich are things like some asshole walking in and firing someone on the spot for playing solitaire, or for cutting workers' pensions, while giving themselves a raise, or for getting rich despite incessant failure. Essentially it's about fairness, and before you knee-jerk react, thinking "fair, the only fairness is to make everyone equally poor", I'm talking about fairness in the processes of the system, not guaranteed success (which is just a right-wing straw-man).

    13. Re:Bloomberg thus joins the ranks by dustmite · · Score: 1

      The saddest part is the post got a +5 (at least that's where it's standing right now).

    14. Re:Bloomberg thus joins the ranks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      loose-r?

      loser.

    15. Re:Bloomberg thus joins the ranks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it's called: We're not mining coal, we're using our heads. And sometimes the best way to get your head back into the game is to take it out of it for a minute, or ten, or an hour; depending on what your game is.
      There is not a single man, woman, or child who can sit down and do his best creative work without taking a break.

      Now, realistically, this guy isn't a creative worker. He's probably basically data entry or a secretary. Regardless, the minute or 5 of Solitaire is much like stopping and having a chat with your fellow miner.

      Why do I compare this to mine work? Because this employee got the same respect from his boss' boss' boss' boss that Mine workers got from their ...

      Face it, Bloomberg's a spineless jerk.

    16. Re:Bloomberg thus joins the ranks by carpe_noctem · · Score: 1

      And to the GP, you will find if you pay attention, that most rich people who's names you know have worked very hard.

      I just knew that Paris Hilton was good at something!

      --
      "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
    17. Re:Bloomberg thus joins the ranks by bxbaser · · Score: 1

      is puncuatian gonna be part of our final grade, ohh grate teachar of slashdot postars.

    18. Re:Bloomberg thus joins the ranks by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1
      Looks to me like the middle paragraph was copy-pasted whole from somewhere else, perhaps from here or here, judging by its immaculate grammar and spelling, as compared to the first and last lines.

      Or maybe this is just a very suttle troll designed to inflame the grammar nazis.

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
    19. Re:Bloomberg thus joins the ranks by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      Hmm... joins??? Didn't he invent the club?

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    20. Re:Bloomberg thus joins the ranks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most not all.

    21. Re:Bloomberg thus joins the ranks by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      And to the GP, you will find if you pay attention, that most rich people who's names you know have worked very hard.

      Most "rich people whose names I know" are movie/music/sports stars, royalty and their children. Not many of them "worked very hard".

    22. Re:Bloomberg thus joins the ranks by zorander · · Score: 4, Informative

      Bloomberg build one of the largest privately held companies from the world from the ground up. His coworkers, some of whom I know, testify whenever possible as to the sweat and intensity he put into the business and how wonderful he was to work for. The benefits offered at his company are among the best in the industry. It's hard to accuse him of not understanding how work gets done or how to/not to treat employees in light of what he's accomplished in his life, in particular from a management perspective.

      Also, if the employee were so indispensible, I assume his manager would have defended him and done whatever possible to give him another chance. Honestly, if the man got fired by a chance remark, even coming out of Bloomberg's mouth, he probably was on the line already for other reasons.

    23. Re:Bloomberg thus joins the ranks by ColaMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      is puncuatian gonna be part of our final grade, ohh grate teachar of slashdot postars.

      It fucking well will be in real life. If you can't spell or put together a proper sentence, you will go nowhere fast.

      Any job application / report to a customer / business proposal instantly loses its authority in the eyes of the recipient if said recipient detects a spelling or grammatical error. Think about that before applying the sarcasm on with a trowel next time.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    24. Re:Bloomberg thus joins the ranks by Guru2Newbie · · Score: 1
      Or maybe this is just a very suttle troll designed to inflame the grammar nazis.

      No, it's a Tuttle Troll. Or is that Buttle Troll?

      Huh. I guess that wasn't too subtle, either.

    25. Re:Bloomberg thus joins the ranks by JimBrownie · · Score: 0, Troll

      Any job application / report to a customer / business proposal instantly loses its authority in the eyes of the recipient if said recipient detects a spelling or grammatical error. Think about that before applying the sarcasm on with a trowel next time.

      Usually because narrow minded individuals such as yourself fail to see past one simple error. Are you proud of the fact that you would disregard any job applicant or proposal because of such trivialities? Food for thought. I mean if it is full of mistakes, I understand, but one. However it is 3 in the morning, sure i mispelled something, so please disregard. Idiot

    26. Re:Bloomberg thus joins the ranks by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      Heck, if the employee were indispensible, he'd be making more than 27k after 6 years in NYC...

      So, yes, it is likely that he wasn't much of a much.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    27. Re:Bloomberg thus joins the ranks by The-Bus · · Score: 1

      That employee should have their web browser open to Bloomberg.com...

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    28. Re:Bloomberg thus joins the ranks by typidemon · · Score: 1
      Usually because narrow minded individuals such as yourself fail to see past one simple error. Are you proud of the fact that you would disregard any job applicant or proposal because of such trivialities? Food for thought. I mean if it is full of mistakes, I understand, but one. However it is 3 in the morning, sure i mispelled something, so please disregard. Idiot

      Maybe you need to spend more time writing your resume. Instead of producing 3am in the morning bullshit.

    29. Re:Bloomberg thus joins the ranks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Brazil"?

    30. Re:Bloomberg thus joins the ranks by bxbaser · · Score: 1

      ummm WAKEE UP this isnt a job application,report to a customer, or business propasal.
      Its a post on slashdot.
      Is your life so empty that you feel the need to point out others shortcomings ?
      If i get to the point in my life where i need the pleasure of pointing out spelling mistakes on an internet message board please shoot me.

    31. Re:Bloomberg thus joins the ranks by ColaMan · · Score: 1

      I'm pointing out a sad fact of life. Really, I don't care if you post on slashdot in leet-speak. Try sending an email to a client like that and you'll lose your contract.

      You use language to get your point across to someone else. If you can't correctly use the language, your point will not be recieved very well. And that point you're trying to make might be the one that gets you off the unemployment line. Or stops your boss from firing you when you make an honest mistake. Or persuades your wife to come back to you (again). All these things require clear communication. Mangled spelling and grammar does not help you in the slightest.

      So again, I don't care what you post here. But if what you post here resembles your grasp of the language, please, for your sake - not mine - improve it.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    32. Re:Bloomberg thus joins the ranks by bxbaser · · Score: 1

      I understand your point about correct use of language.
      I would hope that anyone facing those circumstances would choose their wording and puncuation carefully, I certainly would.
      Commenting on writing skills on slashdot or any other internet forum would be the same as commenting on a coworkers clothing,on sunday while he is working in his garden.

      When reading posts on the internet the last thing i worry about is grammer.
      When reading a contract from my lawyer grammer certainly takes on more importance.

    33. Re:Bloomberg thus joins the ranks by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Draw single cards in a Draw Three game
      Everytime you flip the top stack of cards, hold down CTRL-ALT-SHIFT and instead of flipping three card you only flip one card. This way you can draw single cards but still have the higher score of a "Draw Three" game.

      Force Victory
      Press Alt+Shift+2

      Infinite Points
      In the Windows XP version of solitaire, draw from the deck at least twice. Hold control and drag a card down from the deck. Click the "A" key and then let go of the left mouse key. You will get 10 points for this. Continue doing this for infinite points!

      Infinite points
      To do this trick, finish a game of solitaire with the time bonus option on. The cards will start bouncing. Click on the solitaire screen and the play again box will pop up. Select no, so the solitaire screen is just blank green. Use the instant win cheat (Alt+Shift+2) and you will recieve the time bonus you got last game will be added to your last game's score. For example, if your time bonus was 5000, and your final score was 6000, after using this glitch, you will have a score of 11000. This glitch can be used as many times as you want.

      Move a card to an illegal position
      Use the left mouse button and drag a card onto any legal position, just as you normally would, but do not let go of the left mouse button. While holding the card over the position, hit the Escape key once, then release the left mouse button. Now left click once on any face-up card at all and it will teleport to that position. You may also use the space bar and directional arrows to do this, however the final click to teleport the card must still be done with the left mouse button.

  12. Heh. by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

    "The workplace is not an appropriate place for games," Bloomberg said. "It's a place where you've got to do the job that you're getting paid for."

    I'd cut him a little more slack, if I didn't know a few bosses just like him that managed things so poorly there was plenty of downtime. Of course, I suppose uber-capitalists like himself would say that whenever that occurs you're supposed to clock out so you can save the company your wages...

    1. Re:Heh. by Original+Replica · · Score: 2, Interesting
      if I didn't know a few bosses just like him that managed things so poorly there was plenty of downtime.
      Bloomberg actually manages things quite well, he is excellent at running a bussiness, even the guy who got fired thinks so. It was just as likely the presence of the Photographer that caused the overreaction. Imagine the media heyday if the mayor is on the front page shaking the hand of a city employee and the game screen showed up in the photo. I hope that guy was just a temporary example and they hire him right back though.
      --
      We are all just people.
    2. Re:Heh. by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      So, you quietly take the person aside, ask them
      to ( without attracting attention ) get the game
      off the screen, and you jolly the photographers
      and / or distract them for a moment while that
      happens.

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    3. Re:Heh. by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      All managers, even Bloomberg have employees who have downtime, it's inevitable. Whether it's just natural, or times whether they're slightly less competent I can't say.

  13. Rules by BrookHarty · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If he was playing on a break or on his lunch time, i dont see an issue. If his job wasnt getting done fire him..

    That was a scumbag move of the mayor, firing him without even talking to him.

  14. Two paragraphs from TFA ... by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Office assistant Edward Greenwood IX was going over some papers at his desk as Bloomberg made the rounds with his photographer, greeting workers and posing for pictures. When the mayor reached him, Greenwood stood, they shook hands and the photographer snapped a photo.

    -- and --

    "I expect all city workers, including myself, to work hard," the mayor said. "There's nothing wrong with taking a break, but during the business day, at your desk, that's not appropriate behavior."

    Yep, workin' hard there, Mr. Mayor. Workin' hard.

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    1. Re:Two paragraphs from TFA ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, working hard saving his own ass. Imagine the scandal: "City taxes pay for workers to play"

    2. Re:Two paragraphs from TFA ... by ChrisKnight · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yup, almost as bad as "City taxes pay for the mayor to have his glamor shots taken in an office where other people are working..."

      -Chris

      --
      -- This sig is only a test. If this were a real sig it would say something witty. --
    3. Re:Two paragraphs from TFA ... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      But thats different. He is the mayor! Your a low level employee expected to work like a machine. I see it where I work as well and why is that the executives typically play golf during business days and get compensated 100x more than myself? Hmmm

      It seems the harder you work the lower you are paid. It all has to do with supply and demand. Employers will treat you like crap if anyone is willing to do it and accept the pay. Then why not? Do it to someone who is valuable and middle level with a degree and experience then you can't use that crap as you would no longer have a middle managment left.

    4. Re:Two paragraphs from TFA ... by cicatrix1 · · Score: 1

      Uhhhh are you that naive that you don't get that a large part of politics is this type of bullshit? Look at Bush... Part of the job of being a public figure is to ... be a ... public figure.

      --

      I know more than you drink.
    5. Re:Two paragraphs from TFA ... by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      You don't think making the rounds and posing for pictures should be part of the Mayor's job? It's certainly not what he should be spending all of his time on, but yes, I believe making face-to-face contact with people - especially people who work for the city of which he is Mayor - should be part of his job, and therefore counts as working, even if it doesn't sound nearly as hard as the work you get paid a lot less money to do.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    6. Re:Two paragraphs from TFA ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah? Where's Vice-President Cheney?

    7. Re:Two paragraphs from TFA ... by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1
      Bloomberg made the rounds with his photographer, greeting workers and posing for pictures.

      And there is the real reason for the firing. It makes the mayor look bad if a picture is taken showing government employees with solitaire open on their desktop, regardless of how much time the employee spent playing it. The top priority of politicians are maintaining an image; this was simply part of that.

    8. Re:Two paragraphs from TFA ... by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      You don't think making the rounds and posing for pictures should be part of the Mayor's job?

      Honestly, no, I don't. I mean, if he's running for re-election, then it's obviously part of how he keeps his job, but it's not an integral part of the job itself. I'm all for face-to-face contact for business reasons, but handshaking and photo ops aren't doing business. Does your boss cruise around the halls of your company shaking people's hands just for the hell of it?

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    9. Re:Two paragraphs from TFA ... by Danse · · Score: 1

      Uhhhh are you that naive that you don't get that a large part of politics is this type of bullshit? Look at Bush... Part of the job of being a public figure is to ... be a ... public figure.

      Posing for pictures isn't a large part of his job, it's a large part of keeping your picture and name in everyone's mind so that hopefully you'll get re-elected. As far as I'm concerned, that crap should be done on his own time, not when he should be working. They should fire his ass.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    10. Re:Two paragraphs from TFA ... by Ekevu · · Score: 1

      "Posing for pictures isn't a large part of his job, it's a large part of keeping your picture and name in everyone's mind so that hopefully you'll get re-elected" You seem to forget that his job isn't really mayor, but politician. It like freelance, you don't really get hired or fired, you just get a client and have to do what's necessary to keep that client.

    11. Re:Two paragraphs from TFA ... by Danse · · Score: 1

      You seem to forget that his job isn't really mayor, but politician. It like freelance, you don't really get hired or fired, you just get a client and have to do what's necessary to keep that client.

      I'll go ahead and assume you're being sarcastic, but you just highlighted what's wrong with our political system. Politicians care more about getting re-elected than actually doing their jobs. There's something wrong with a system when the incentives are so backwards as to produce the sort of corruption and waste that we see today.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    12. Re:Two paragraphs from TFA ... by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 1

      Eh, being seen *is* the mayors job. It may not seem like much of a job to you, but it is, and it is even important.

      Firing low-ranking employees is, however, *not* the job of the mayor.

  15. Not nearly as bad as... by alyawn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Smoking. Co-workers that smoke use up far more time than those that blow off steam with Solitare. When you see an employee playing Enemy Territory, *then* you need to worry.

    1. Re:Not nearly as bad as... by saleenS281 · · Score: 1

      You only have to worry if you're the one assigned to firing him! (I suggest asking if he's a member of the NRA first)

    2. Re:Not nearly as bad as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Totally agree. Smokers are the worst blight on the American workforce since they outlawed smoking indoors. :-)

      I get really irritated at my co-workers and subordinates who smoke. For one, its like a social hour for them. They dont just haul arse outside take some puffs and then haul arse back to their desk. They walk like turtles to their destination, oftentimes stopping to BS 3 or 4 times along the way. Then they stand there and BS with all the other non-productive workers once they're done smoking. So by the time they get back to their desks its been 20 minutes. I don't see them coming in early or staying late to make up for the time. It seems like they think thats a part of their work. Very annoying.

    3. Re:Not nearly as bad as... by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Though I don't encourage anyone to take up smoking, it can make for a good bonding experience with upper management.

      Find out when/where the head honchos in your building go for a smoke and just show up.

      If he/she/they like you, you might get that raise a bit earlier, or you might find yourself with a promotion/transfer to a better job.

      There's something about standing around in the cold to feed your vice that brings people together.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    4. Re:Not nearly as bad as... by shitdrummer · · Score: 1

      To compare time wasting properly you would have to include the time that people spend talking, going to the toilet, on personal phone calls, or just not thinking about the job. You would also have to credit them for the extra hours worked, the lunches skipped, and all the times you were called at home at 3am because a security guard saw a "flashing light, that was red" or something else innocuous and decides to call you even though you're not on call!

      All that should really matter is that you are doing all the work that's required of you on time and in a professional manner.*

      *Not considering staffing shortages, dickhead managers or other issues out of your control.

      Shitdrummer.

    5. Re:Not nearly as bad as... by freeweed · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Or pregnant women. First, they take many more bathroom breaks over a 9 month period (for several reasons). Then, they take MONTHS off work WITH PAY,

      Sounds stupid, doesn't it?

      Companies should just give every employee the same number of breaks, the same number of days off, etc. Use them how you see fit, so that we don't have to look down our noses at people who do things we may disapprove of. Quit smoking, gain two 15 minute Solitaire breaks per day!

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    6. Re:Not nearly as bad as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They only use up more time because you whiners made them go outside. Find me a smoker that wouldn't be happy to smoke at their desk and then you have a complaint. Otherwise, take your self-righteous crap somewhere else.

    7. Re:Not nearly as bad as... by TheLink · · Score: 1

      I'm not a smoker, but I bet it's even better if Da Boss is out of smokes, and you offer him one of your ciggies...

      Talk about creating opportunities ;).

      Now that doesn't work if you're a nonsmoker - you can't offer a spare cig if you don't smoke yourself - even if you somehow had one, it just won't look right.

      --
    8. Re:Not nearly as bad as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Though I don't encourage anyone to take up smoking, it can make for a good bonding experience with upper management.

      Yeah, you might both end up in the same hospital ward coughing your lungs up. That's a fantastic bonding experience.

    9. Re:Not nearly as bad as... by Ratso+Baggins · · Score: 1
      It is all about empathy.

      First and foremost - A happy worker is a Productive worker.

      You know you are right, every smoker in the world smokes solely to annoy you personally. I can see given the opportunity, you would make a great micro-manager.

      I have been managing for many many years now, and I assure you if you treat your employees as adults and not children, they will behave like adults (inspired and grateful come to mind).

      Multiplayer LAN games have been a staple of staff motivation since doom 1 (and esp C&C). My crew can have a game of whatever they like when ever they like - for as long as they like. You may scoff but they all love working here and all work at least 40 hrs of productive work a week as well as personal interests like O/S projects, etc.

      Another key is fair and direct appraisal, criticism and (most importantly) appreciation.

      With out empathy you are nothing to nobody.

      --

      --
      "we live in a post-ideological world..." - Billy Bragg.

    10. Re:Not nearly as bad as... by onebuttonmouse · · Score: 1

      At my place of work you can smoke as much as you like, but you are expected to clock out while doing so. Even though they have to work extra minutes to make up the time (we are on flexitime) they still won't give up cigarettes!

      --
      MacBook Pro. Worst name since the Bicycle
    11. Re:Not nearly as bad as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      All that should really matter is that you are doing all the work that's required of you on time and in a professional manner.* *Not considering staffing shortages, dickhead managers or other issues out of your control. Shitdrummer.

      How do you know how much time is needed to do the job professionally?

    12. Re:Not nearly as bad as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's ridiculous. First the whiney non-smokers want smokers to go outside to smoke, and then they want smokers to compensate them for the courtesy? Typical. Non-smokers should have to give smokers ten minutes from their time card every time they go outside instead of smoking at their desk. Second-hand smoke may cause some cancer, but I bet not nearly as much as the stress caused by all you whiny control freaks.

    13. Re:Not nearly as bad as... by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      where do you work that breeders get time off with pay? around here they can leave for N weeks (forgot the exact number) and they can't be fired for taking the time off, but that is it.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    14. Re:Not nearly as bad as... by sckeener · · Score: 1

      Smoking. Co-workers that smoke use up far more time than those that blow off steam with Solitare.

      So true. I know several people in the military that took up smoking because that was a way to get a break.

      Heck, I started taking smoke breaks and I don't smoke.

      --
      "Only one thing, is impossible for god: to find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." Mark Twain
    15. Re:Not nearly as bad as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen brother!

      Thats whatr I keep telling my management, but I get nowhere with it. We have the hardware in training rooms to segment a lan, and game away consequence free, but they see "games" as taboo in a business environment, even for "team building" purposes.

      We are in a unique scenario where our IT department supports several business units, which combined make up our corporation. So if a business unit executive caught us, it could mean outsourcing all of our IT responsibilities.

      I can certainly understand why.

      It's sad that such a great potential tool for team building is considered such a waste of time.

      I only hope that I can employ those fun type activities when my business takes off. Or if it never does, I hope to work for someone like you.

  16. Big deal by Ingolfke · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Someone got fired... so what? Really, why is this news?

    1. Re:Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's newsworthy, because it stinks to high heaven. The mayor is out for a meet-n-greet, grip-n-grin photo op with a group of (ostensibly) random city employees. Lo and behold, he catches one of them shirking duty (maybe) and wasting your taxdollars in the process.

      And at once, he is both the benevolent ruler of the masses, and the hand of civic justice. What's one moderate wage earner, in exchange for the admirations of thousands? Water off a duck's back

    2. Re:Big deal by Ingolfke · · Score: 1

      Get back to work you fuckin' hippie.

  17. A little extreme, but... by NorbrookC · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When you know the boss is going to be around, with reporters, why would you be playing a game on your computer? I'm sorry the guy lost his job, and yes, I think a reprimand would have been more appropriate, but still, he wasn't very bright.

    1. Re:A little extreme, but... by dvk · · Score: 1

      "but still, he wasn't very bright."

      The guy was an office assistant working for the City.
      Do you actually expect someone at that job to be even marginally intelligent?
      If so, you never dealt with government (epsecially NYC) employees.

      --
      "The right to figure things out for yourself is the only true freedom everyone shares. Go use it"-R.A.Heinlein
    2. Re:A little extreme, but... by simishag · · Score: 1

      Precisely. It's one thing to slack when your direct boss is around. He knows you personally, he knows if you're capable or not, and even if he catches you slacking when you shouldn't be, he'll probably let you off with a reminder to get back to work (assuming he doesn't catch you all the time).

      It's quite another to slack so obviously when the CEO (or mayor) is around, with press & photogs in tow. It shows that you aren't even smart enough to *pretend* to work when the situation calls for it. I mean, how hard is it to remember the "boss key?"

      More importantly, playing games shows that you don't care if you make the CEO look bad because his employees aren't working. That's WAY worse than just idling. Hell, even sleeping at your desk probably wouldn't be as bad as playing games; at least you could come up with an excuse for sleeping, like "I had a late night running the latest polling numbers."

    3. Re:A little extreme, but... by MickoZ · · Score: 1

      Of course being hypocrite is so often characterized with being smart.

      Why act realistically is something wrong?

      All people are trying to lie to everyone around.

      What is important is what you do, what you achieve, etc.

      "Be professional" ... common.

      Anyway, if you don't fit in the mould you are not smart? If you are not a 9-5 person, you are not smart? If you don't get the average grade at school (but more than average!), you are not smart?

      Would you prefer an employee who play games, take it easy in life but work hard to deliver result or someone who work "very hard" to achieve... nothing?

  18. I dunno about you guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But I'd never vote Bloomberg after that (not that I live in New York).
    Had Bloomberg had the balls to walk up to the man and fire him in person it'd be one thing; but to fire a $27K secretary for playing a game of Solitaire, later, via your secretary: What a useless jerk.

    For $27K you'd never find me racking my brain for 40 hours a week ;).

    And the idiot still likes Bloomberg...

    1. Re:I dunno about you guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      $27K in New York City? That is slave wages. And after six years yet . . . How do you survive in NYC on $27K ? ? ?

      That guy should move to Vegas.

    2. Re:I dunno about you guys by BoneFlower · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Realistically, roomates. Preferably several with compatable shift/sleep schedules.

      Alternately, you'd be surprised what you can live on. Here in CT minimum wage is 7.55/hr. That works out to 15,704 dollars per year. Absolute crap money pretty much anywhere.

      Rents can be found as low as 500/mo if you really look hard, realistically 600-700 is the lower range for a studio or smallish one bedroom(working on moving out ATM, so my info is fairly current for the New Haven area). Get fond of ramen and Goodwill stores, and you can survive on minimum wage. You will have a pretty shitty life, but you wont' be homeless, and you won't die of malnutrition(some malnutrition related illnesses are possible, but not likely to face a lethal problem in the short term).

      Granted, NYC is a lot more expensive than the ghettos of CT that I'm referring to here, but 27k is also a lot more money than 15.7k. I'm sure most people can survive on that much in NYC if they are willing to be ruthlessly frugal. Not a life many would want, but it is possible.

      This isn't even accounting for various welfare programs which can make living on shit wages much easier, such as Section 8 housing which fixes the max rent you will pay to 1/3rd of your income(run the numbers above, that minimum wage in CT scenario leads to well over half of your income going to housing).

    3. Re:I dunno about you guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Granted, NYC is a lot more expensive than the ghettos of CT that I'm referring to here, but 27k is also a lot more money than 15.7k.

      Well, I've lived for the last 5 years on ~15-20k a year (in New York City). It's not a lot, but if you don't get anything that you don't -need-, it's livable. Best part: I only work 6 hours a week (part-time)---mostly a personal choice to not work 9-5; I think live is much more enjoyable that way.

  19. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lighten up guys, jeeeeeeeez!

  20. Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone wonder what happens if an employer sees you on slashdot at work?

    1. Re:Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll tell you John, you get FIRED! Now clear your desk and get out of my sight.

      - Steve

    2. Re:Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats either very funny or very sad.

  21. not first but still - a question by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 3, Funny

    The only question I have about the story is what kind of crappy job is there in the Mayor's office - that pays less than 30k a year - IN FRIGGING MANHATTAN? I guess he'll have to change jobs - and get to STOP EATING TOP-RAMEN.

  22. It's more efficient to take short breaks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    than to work continuously without taking any breaks. On the other hand, if a worker can goof off all the time, you have to ask yourself what kind of manager does he have if the manager can't tell if the worker is productive or not. Looking like you're working isn't the same as being productive.

  23. Bloomberg... by LordSnooty · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... must be a Freecell fan.

    1. Re:Bloomberg... by RussR42 · · Score: 0

      Nah, I'm sure it's minesweeper all the way, baby!

    2. Re:Bloomberg... by prockcore · · Score: 4, Funny

      If only he was playing Minesweeper. He could've claimed to be looking for WMDs.

  24. "Plenty of work to do"? by GuyWhoPosts · · Score: 1

    Since when is "plenty of work" a guarantee that an employee won't play plenty of solitaire? Maybe he just didn't give a damn about his work.

  25. He doesn't like the game... by Kaetemi · · Score: 1

    And soon after that, Mayor Michael Bloomberg went back to his own pc and started a game of FreeCell.

    --
    Kaetemi
  26. honestly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Taking a break from your work will do wonders. Sometimes you need to clear your mind and get back to your work refreshed... especially if you're stumped on an intense problem.

    1. Re:honestly... by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      I find going back to work helps me when I am really stumped at a good game of freecell.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  27. Only a few minutes? by digidave · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can we all agree that this guy is lying. Of course he played for more than a few minutes. We all have our necessary distractions. I browse Slashdot. My boss downloads hockey fights and forwards me Nigerian email scams (I kid you not!).

    Every good manager knows that employees need a bit of time to themselves. Just look at Google's policy for working on personal projects and what a great benefit that policy is to both Google and its employees.

    At my last job we had short Unreal Tournamet sessions one day a week and nakednews.com viewings in the morning, and everybody was really happy with their job. Everybody got a lot of great work done.

    --
    The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
    1. Re:Only a few minutes? by Threni · · Score: 3, Funny

      > Can we all agree that this guy is lying.

      You mean "assume", right? Perhaps it's `creative dismissal`. If I'd been fired for playing a game at lunchtime you can bet I'd be hiring a solicitor right now. Well, as soon as I finish this level...

    2. Re:Only a few minutes? by HairyCanary · · Score: 1

      I don't know about where you work, but at my workplace the rules are pretty clear. No games on company owned equipment. So it may be your lunchtime, but if you do not own the PC, hiring a solicitor will be a waste of your time.

    3. Re:Only a few minutes? by Grey+Ninja · · Score: 1

      I like to make ropes out of paper clips in my cubicle. Then I like to anchor them to a nail and lower them out of the window. That could very well be described as a game using company owned equipment. (Whenever anyone comments on it, I say it's for organizational reasons).

    4. Re:Only a few minutes? by Kinthelt · · Score: 1

      Wow, sounds a lot like a place I used to work at for two workterms. It was a great place to work, and I got so much work done.

      --

      "Evil will always triumph over good, because good is dumb." - Dark Helmet (Spaceballs)

    5. Re:Only a few minutes? by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Every good manager knows that employees need a bit of time to themselves.

      Not every manager is a good one.

      I was working as a bicycle mechanic, once upon a time, and was 10 hours into a 12 hour day without a break. Nothing. No coffee, no lunch. Nothing. Completley illegal as it happens. It was spring tune up rush and I was willing to bend to meet the labor demand. I was young and stupid. Ya know, like an EA programmer.

      Someone handed me a Pepsi and I opened it up and started to take a drink and the owner walked up to me and said, "You know you can hold that can in one hand and turn a wrench with the other."

      Not every manager is a good manager.

      He never got the chance to fire me. I was gone before that.

      KFG

    6. Re:Only a few minutes? by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      Just look at Google's policy for working on personal projects and what a great benefit that policy is to both Google and its employees.

      Ahh, the dot-com atmosphere. Problem is, more often than not, it doesn't last. Very few folks get paid for what they trully enjoy---that's why they call it -work-.

      And if you do want to work on things you enjoy, you have no choice but to start your own company and do things your way.

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    7. Re:Only a few minutes? by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
      nakednews.com viewings in the morning
      Ummm...
      A. Sexual harrassment
      B. Hostile work environment
      C. Both of the above

      Kudos to y'all for your comraderie, but anyone from Human Resources or a corporate attorney would most likely freak out if you told them about naked news.

      Even if it's just a group of guys, any one of them could potentially decide to sue for A, B, or C. And they would win.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    8. Re:Only a few minutes? by digidave · · Score: 1

      "Ahh, the dot-com atmosphere."

      No, the dot-com atmosphere was well above and a few games and some nakednews.com viewing. I'm talking about a very well-respected 60+ year-old company. We didn't exactly broadcast our escapades to HR, but in general everyone at the company liked to have fun. We even found out that one female employee had her own porn web site. When word spread the firewall logs were funny ("Check out what the CEO's looking at!")

      --
      The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
    9. Re:Only a few minutes? by ipfwadm · · Score: 1

      If I'd been fired for playing a game at lunchtime you can bet I'd be hiring a solicitor right now. Well, as soon as I finish this level...

      Except that New York is an employment-at-will state. Your employer may fire you or you may quit at any time, with or without notice (*), for any reason, or for no reason at all (unless of course the reason is something otherwise prohibited, which is basically only age/sex/race/whatever discrimination). Employment contracts notwithstanding, of course, but I'll go out on a limb and say that a person in this guy's position wouldn't have a contract.

      (*) At least in New York, conditions can be tacked on to "with or without notice" that act as incentives to employees to provide notice. For example, it's somewhat common to have a policy that says that employees will only be paid for unused vacation if they provide two weeks notice before quitting; if you just up and leave one day, you forfeit that money. My employer just instituted this policy.

    10. Re:Only a few minutes? by EnglishDude · · Score: 1

      He didn't say every manager is a good one, he said every *good* manager knows that employees need some time to themeslves - which he means those managers that are good knows that employees need some time to themselves - i.e. managers that doesn't know that (like yours) are NOT good managers. Good managers are rare, but they do exist and they do know that employees need time to themselves. Working in the big bad world for the first time ever, I was told "There's a break at 11 in the coffee room, and lunch is usually at 1 to 2 but up to you really". After a few weeks, I asked if there were an official break in the afternoon, my manager said "Eh, take breaks whenever you want" - and eventually I found out that I can start work whenever I want, go home whenever I want, take as much breaks I want doing anything I want (respecting the IT policy of course, such as not surfing porn etc) but as long as I get the work done. It's generally expected that I come in every working day though, at a reasonable time. If I don't do my work, I get warned, then eventually fired. I won't get fired for slacking off. Shame the manager quit after 3 months and his manager hasn't replaced him (that was 3 years ago) and he's micromanaging to the extreme - tho the policies stays in place.

    11. Re:Only a few minutes? by kfg · · Score: 1

      Can we all agree that this guy is lying. Of course he played for more than a few minutes.

      No. We cannot all agree to that. Not every manager is a good manager.

      KFG

  28. I can think of better ways to get fired at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I downloaded this onto me boss' computer: ~46MB of Lesbian Strapon double-doggy-style pornography, available here at this Rapidshare URL

    To confirm you're not a script,
    please type the word in this image: cockthirst

  29. Back in the day of Windows 3.1... by dcavanaugh · · Score: 5, Funny

    We were in the process of replacing our beloved VAXstations with high-end (60 MHz!) Pentium PCs running Windows 3.1. One of the big wigs was walking through the data center, and noticed a programmer playing Solotaire. He asks, "What is she doing?". A co-worker in the neighboring cube notices the situation and defuses the crisis by spewing a load of BS: "She's doing mouse calibration; they have you use this program, so the pointer on the screen can be aligned with the roller ball inside the mouse. It only takes a few minutes and it lines up the pointer for you."

    1. Re:Back in the day of Windows 3.1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to play Quake at my job, which I called testing video card performance.

    2. Re:Back in the day of Windows 3.1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any networked game = "stress testing the network." ;)

    3. Re:Back in the day of Windows 3.1... by sparkz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      When I did PC support, there was a new-hire secretary who had no Windows experience. (This was in the days of Win3.1). I showed her how to find the games, as these would help her to use the mouse. Without that, she'd no idea about what the mouse did, or what it was for.

      --
      Author, Shell Scripting : Expert Re
    4. Re:Back in the day of Windows 3.1... by Grapes4Buddha · · Score: 1

      Believe it or not, I actually had to do this as part of my job once. Except it was the original DOOM and I was making sure the spiffy new S3 board would perform well. Back in early '95 if I recall correctly. Ah, good times.

    5. Re:Back in the day of Windows 3.1... by Skater · · Score: 1

      When my employer started using Windows and mice, I heard that they told everyone to play Solitare to get used to the mouse, then after a few weeks they went around and removed it from their computers. Seemed like a great idea to me.

    6. Re:Back in the day of Windows 3.1... by 3ryon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We were in the process of replacing our beloved VAXstations with high-end (60 MHz!) Pentium PCs running Windows 3.1. One of the big wigs was walking through the data center, and noticed a programmer playing Solotaire. He asks, "What is she doing?"

      Your boss was absolutely correct in questioning why a programmer was in the data center.

    7. Re:Back in the day of Windows 3.1... by jafac · · Score: 1

      For a contract, we provided computers with solitaire as a mousing training aid - with the intention of removing it.

      Well, the bright guy who did the removing just used the add/remove windows components control panel - so the game was no longer in the Start menu. But you could still get to it with Start->Run sol.exe. So, these users, who were originally dumb enough to need Solitaire to train them how to use a mouse, were smart enough to manually find and run the executable. Either that, or someone actually READ their Windows for Dummies book . . .

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    8. Re:Back in the day of Windows 3.1... by Bacon+Bits · · Score: 1

      This was actually the intended purpose for including these particular games. Solitare is designed to teach you point and click, drag and drop, and double-click. Minesweeper is designed to teach you point and click, and right and left click.

      --
      The road to tyranny has always been paved with claims of necessity.
  30. Another reason to smoke by RingDev · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Smokers take their 15 minute morning and afternoon breaks. And they will band together to ensure that no one imposes rules against them. Hell, unions have even been used to protect the glorious smoke break. But what about non-smokers? Ever since I quite smoking I have also quit taking 15 minute breaks. Now, when I need a break, I hit slash dot, check my email, and try to let my brain relax. So yeah, some hard ass could can me for "abusing web privledges", but I can point out to him how my web browsing is inplace of smoking, and by browsing the web I am saving him thousands of dollars in sick time and increased health insurance premiums.

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    1. Re:Another reason to smoke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      Smokers take their 15 minute morning and afternoon breaks.

      More like their 10 minute early morning break, 10 minute late morning smoke break, 10 minute pre lunch smoke break, 10 min post lunch smoke break, 10 min early afternoon break and 10 minute late afternoon break. Many, perhaps most, smokers habbit is far to consuming to go hours without a smoke.

    2. Re:Another reason to smoke by HappyHour · · Score: 0

      Former smokers are the most militant non-smokers on the planet. Just take a 15 minute coffee break outside on the offce steps.

    3. Re:Another reason to smoke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting as AC for protection. Had an idiot that was hired to be my assistant years ago that was a smoker. He managed to become my manager by pulling the wool over managment's eyes. Anyway, he'd take 15 minute smoke breaks...every hour. You do the math, and guess who caught hell for all the work not getting done.

      BTW: this guy usually showed up to work drunk or got drunk while on the job. Management let it continue until I turned in my notice and left. He was "asked to leave" about a month later.

    4. Re:Another reason to smoke by LocalH · · Score: 1
      Anyway, he'd take 15 minute smoke breaks...every hour. You do the math, and guess who caught hell for all the work not getting done.
      The problem there wasn't that he took a 15-minute smoke break each hour, but that he couldn't complete the work. Last job I worked, I took an abundance of smoke breaks (at least one per hour, about 5-6 minutes long) without negatively impacting my work in the slightest.
      --
      FC Closer
    5. Re:Another reason to smoke by Y-Crate · · Score: 1
      Former smokers are the most militant non-smokers on the planet. Just take a 15 minute coffee break outside on the offce steps.

      I'm sure a lot of people would..if they could hope to do so and keep their jobs.

      Smokers get extra break privileges in many, many work environments all across the nation. Non-smokers are simply not allowed to take the same amount of time off from their work as their nicotine-favoring coworkers can. When you deny non-smokers the chance to take the same amount of time out of their workday for breaks, it leads to unnecessary resentment, and an upset workforce is not a productive workforce.

      I simply reject the notion that 15 minute breaks will bring more harm than good to a company's bottom line. As studies have repeatedly shown, the longer you work after a certain point, the less "real" work you do. Mistakes begin to crop up, stress begins to mount, and you end up spending a much larger percentage of this time going back and correcting your errors, than actually producing anything. The impact of this stress on interpersonal relations in the work environment cannot easily be quantified, but I dare say it is significant.
    6. Re:Another reason to smoke by MyNymWasTaken · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When I worked at a gov. office, and every one of my co-workers took smoke breaks, I very insistently took reading breaks. Whenever a manager tried to call me on it, I asked why the smokers could wander off whenever they wanted to.

      I do believe I had one boss try to claim that was different because "smoking is an addiction". My response was on the order of "well... reading is my addiction."

    7. Re:Another reason to smoke by mebob · · Score: 1

      Someone sure as hell shouldn't be given slack for smoking. What if you were an alcoholic whould a quick shot or sip from a flask be equivalent to a newport? I mean if anything it's more efficient you wouldn't even need to get up. And if you could drink guinness you could skip lunch : )

      --
      =1000101
    8. Re:Another reason to smoke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like their 10 minute early morning break, 10 minute late morning smoke break, 10 minute pre lunch smoke break, 10 min post lunch smoke break, 10 min early afternoon break and 10 minute late afternoon break. Many, perhaps most, smokers habbit is far to consuming to go hours without a smoke.

      And if your job involves thinking and problem solving, these smoke breaks are not a problem.

    9. Re:Another reason to smoke by aeoo · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm a non-smoker and I take my 15 minute breaks just like any smoker. The only difference is that instead of smoking I walk around the block meditating. This is good for many reasons. Eye strain reduction, RSI prevention, and spiritual needs (which to me is a hands-off area...I don't care what anyone says -- the world may collapse and I will still take a 15 minute meditation break if I feel the need).

    10. Re:Another reason to smoke by shitdrummer · · Score: 1

      But costing your boss a lot more in bandwidth.

      Seroiusly, most of the Internet usage in my building, and dare I say probably most offices, is from personal browsing.

      We get spikes in the morning to news sites from 8am right up to about 10am. Huge usage again over the lunch breaks to various sites, but that doesn't taper off until about 3.30pm or so. Friday lunch time isn't too bad but still noticeably high, lots of people are at the pub. But from about 3pm on Fridays until about 4.30 we see high usage again. Lots go home early.

      Random Office Drone: "Playing solitaire is so 90's now, don't you know? Everyone's checking out the Internet now. It's amazing what's out there. And the work connection is so much faster than at home."

      Shitdrummer.

    11. Re:Another reason to smoke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eat a dick. U R teh ghey. I R Troll

    12. Re:Another reason to smoke by tritab · · Score: 2, Funny

      15 minutes twice a day? Try 15 minutes every hour.

    13. Re:Another reason to smoke by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      Alcohol can impair your work. Smoking does not.

    14. Re:Another reason to smoke by rossz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Under California law, your employee is required to give you two breaks during the day on the clock if you work an eight hour shift. At my last job they were so anal they tried to insist I clock out for my two breaks. Not only did I always ignore this demand, I printed out the part of the labor code that specified my break rights and posted it prominently.

      Now I work at a better paying job where there is no time clock and my boss smokes more than me. When I take a smoke break, it's usually with my boss and we discuss work related issues. It improves our productivity (and we're sticking with that story).

      --
      -- Will program for bandwidth
    15. Re:Another reason to smoke by Al+Dimond · · Score: 1

      Beyond the typical argument that smoking can impair your health and cause you to take more sick days, I'm sure that smoking in excess could cause you to be temporarily unproductive. Just as eating too much sugar at lunch could impair your concentration. Or if you did a 10-mile run all-out over your lunch break you'd probably lose productivity in the afternoon.

      On the other hand, eating reasonably will give you energy. A nice little jog or walk over the lunch break can be refreshing. Most smokers aren't going to smoke their way into immediate unproductivity. And you can drink in such a way as not to impair your work also. Supposedly Karl Marx wrote while drinking very slowly and evenly, very late at night (alcohol in small quantities helps you stay awake). Regardless of any "no wonder socialism is such a joke, it was just a drunken rant!" quips this might spur, I've personally tried it while coding late at night and had a very productive and enjoyable session.

      Anything *can* impair your work (and your life), and most things will if you do them in excess. That doesn't make them automatically evil.

    16. Re:Another reason to smoke by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 1

      What I don't understand is that given the current cost of tobacco products, why smokers don't just use nicotine patches instead? I mean, if you'll stand outside in a Chicago Winter to stick burning weeds in your mouth, you've crossed from "habit" to "substance-abuse problem".

      The alternative; buy one pack of cigs for show, slap the patch on your neck, go talk to people like you're going outside, then end the loop back at your desk without ever leaving the warm.

      As a non-smoker, I still feel that since you can't drink, shoot-up, drop acid, make out or engage in life-threatening sports on the job, why do smokers get a free pass for their addiction?

      --
      the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
    17. Re:Another reason to smoke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I printed out the part of the labor code that specified my break rights and posted it prominently.


      That's funny. If you had actually read the whole thing you would have noticed the part where it says that the document is supposed to be posted in a conspicuous area available to all employees.
    18. Re:Another reason to smoke by steveo777 · · Score: 1
      I had gotten really sick of smoker's exorbitant breaks at an old job. I asked my boss why these guys could leave the office every half hour for 5-10 minutes. She just said that they needed the break to cope with stress. Well, I was waiting tables too, why couldn't I get a break. The answer, "You don't smoke, you don't get a break."

      I started making deals with the other servers immediately, and those that would cover for me for 5 minutes, I would cover for. Those that would not (including my boss), I would tell their customers that they were out smoking, and must have forgotten that the guests were here (if they were angry, I'd go on to say that they often did this), but I cover for him/her and get what they needed. I started getting extra tips immediately.

      At my current job, it's pretty lax. Although I see a few of the guys in another department on their way out of the building for a smoke break at least 10 times a day, not including their 15min breaks and lunch. I try not to count them because I'm allowed little breaks for /. and the like. But one of these guys is the head of another department and is an F---ing Nazi about his employee's time. He just fired some lady because her kid was sick and she didn't have vacation to cover going to the school to pick up the kid. (She had been here a two weeks, none accrued). I'm glad I don't work for the SOB, but some of my friends here do. He is having them document every coffee break and piss break so they don't take more than 15min in the morning or afternoon in total. But, nobody feels like complaining, so nothing will ever get done.

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
    19. Re:Another reason to smoke by rossz · · Score: 1

      That's why I posted it.

      --
      -- Will program for bandwidth
    20. Re:Another reason to smoke by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 0
      And if your job involves thinking and problem solving, these smoke breaks are not a problem.
      Then neither is a newspaper break, a slashdot break or a solitaire break - which is what the article is all about.
      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
  31. Awesome by PCM2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So let's get this straight. The guy works the same menial office job for six years, his salary was only $27,000, and Mayor Bloomberg fires him for taking a break during the workday at his desk, which according to the mayor was "not appropriate behavior."

    I mean ... would you cry about it? I can't think of any greater favor Bloomberg could have done for this guy than to get him the fuck outta there.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
    1. Re:Awesome by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      It seems the big guys treat all lower end employees like this. We are machines and until you are promoted. Its no respect at all and they think we just do basic human labor as quickly as possible until we are more valuable and promoted.

    2. Re:Awesome by Eccles · · Score: 1

      You may be right. At the height of the recession, we had to layoff several people. I still see one of them fairly regularly, and he says it was the best thing that could have happened to him.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  32. solitaire is not the focal point of situation by icepick72 · · Score: 0

    IMHO, there is always more to the story. Rarely will an employer blow his top and let go a valuable employee because of a seemingly minor offence, especially if the employee has the longevity of 6 years.
    There's more to the story than we know, the media is only framing the most entertaining situation to gain readership. Most likely the solitaire game was the last straw in a series of events over a long period of time. People don't just let people go at the drop of a hat. Don't get bent out of shape or scared by this story.

    1. Re:solitaire is not the focal point of situation by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      I'd believe that if it was his immediate supervisor that had canned him, but I somehow doubt Bloomberg even knows this guy's name, much less what his job performance is like.

      I'm also not sure how wasting time on a photo-op enhances the quality of work the mayor is doing, particularly when he had just spent thousands of dollars of his constituents' money to fly to the state capitol just to hear a speech that he could just as easily have heard in his office.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    2. Re:solitaire is not the focal point of situation by _Sambo · · Score: 1

      Did you read the article? Do you know who Bloomberg is? This is not a case of persistent poor performance. This is a case of the MAN bearing down on the little guy.
      Wonder what crap job this guy was doing to get $27k in Manhattan.

    3. Re:solitaire is not the focal point of situation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you people know where Albany is? It's several hours away from Manhattan.

  33. /emo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Cry more noob.

  34. Solitare used to be my wallpaper. by jzarling · · Score: 4, Funny

    I worked in a call center for more time than I would like to admit, and every month or so a new policy like this would come down the pipe.
    As an act of civil disobedience I made solitare my wall paper, and removed all my icons.

    --
    It is better to be the hammer than the anvil.
    1. Re:Solitare used to be my wallpaper. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would not have happened with my GPO!

    2. Re:Solitare used to be my wallpaper. by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      Somewhat more entertaining is to take a screenshot of the desktop and set -that- as the wallpaper---on your bosses box :-)

      (or on school computers)

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

  35. It wasn't in Manhattan by PCM2 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The guy didn't work in New York, he worked at the Albany city legislative office. The median income for a male living in Albany is ~$31,000.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
    1. Re:It wasn't in Manhattan by DarkClown · · Score: 1

      he worked in nyc's legilative office in albany.
      first thing i thought when i saw 27k in the city was - he needed to quit anyway and start shining shoes so he can, like, eat and pay rent...

  36. Entrapment? by havardi · · Score: 1

    Why didn't their IT department remove the games if it was so against policy (even during lunch breaks)? To me, you can't justly enforce a policy unless you make a resonable attempt to prevent the behavior. No drinking at work, but keep the fridge stocked with beer?

    1. Re:Entrapment? by gdulli · · Score: 1

      You have no idea what the word "entrapment" actually means.

    2. Re:Entrapment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      You mean not keeping me from doing something I intend to knowingly and willingly do on a daily basis isn't entrapment?
      </sarcasm>

    3. Re:Entrapment? by havardi · · Score: 1

      Are you sure you do? Because, it sure does seem to be a pretty gray area in the legal world. I would say it is borderline entrapment if you install "illegal" software on someone's computer and bust them when they start to use it...

      If the police put child porn on your computer, could you get busted for viewing it? *shrug*, I don't know with our wacky legal system-- and I doubt you do either.

    4. Re:Entrapment? by Fire+Dragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would say it is borderline entrapment if you install "illegal" software on someone's computer and bust them when they start to use it...

      goverment allows me to have a car that goes 130mph, but busts me when I do so on 55mph zone.

      I'm allowed to have a gun, but get busted doing something illegal with it.

      I'm living in a free world, having free will. If I know something to be illegal or against policies it is up to me to choose what I want to do. I may break the law/policies as much as I want to, but I have to face penalties if being coucht.

  37. RTFP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The Republican mayor stopped by the city's legislative office in Albany a few weeks ago when he was visiting the state Capitol to hear the governor's State of the State address.

    $30K in Albany isn't nearly as bad (although it still sucks)

    1. Re:RTFP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      although it still sucks
       
      Especially for 39 with a kid.

  38. Evil breeds evil... by Thunderstruck · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Nobody ever gets fired for playing tabletop role playing games at work. At least, nobody I ever heard of. Surely this is because computer games are so much more detrimental to productivity.

    On a related note, back in Law School, most folks used laptops to take notes. The Dean used to walk through the back of class from time to time. If he was in a particularly bad mood, he'd signal the professor teaching to call on whoever was playing solitare. Getting "called on" in law school is often just as unpleasant in real life as it appears in movies like "Legally Blonde." More so when you're playing solitare and not paying attention. It was evil, really.

    Nobody ever got kicked out of school for it though.

    --
    Trying to use sarcasm in text-based forums does not work.
    1. Re:Evil breeds evil... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      On a related note, back in Law School, most folks used laptops to take notes. The Dean used to walk through the back of class from time to time. If he was in a particularly bad mood, he'd signal the professor teaching to call on whoever was playing solitare. Getting "called on" in law school is often just as unpleasant in real life as it appears in movies like "Legally Blonde." More so when you're playing solitare and not paying attention. It was evil, really.


      That is pretty evil.. all hail the Socratic method!

      There was a lot of web surfing during some of the more boring lectures, but now we've just installed kill switches on the access points that the prof throws to the "off" position at the start of class. Back to solitare!
    2. Re:Evil breeds evil... by rc5-ray · · Score: 1

      The Law School story is different. You, the Law Student, are paying money for an education. Sure, they can grill you with questions and generally embarass you, but you're not actually doing something against the rules. If your behavior hurts your productivity (your ability to learn and graduate law school), that's only hurting you.

      This contrasts with someone who is paid to perform a job and has an acceptable use policy as part of their contract. If you're not doing your job, you're not upholding your end of the contract. You are breaking the rules that you agreed to as part of your contract, and you can be fired.

      Yeah, it stinks to get fired over a stupid game like Solitaire, but the principle still holds. (Freecell might be worth getting fired ;-)

    3. Re:Evil breeds evil... by leabre · · Score: 1

      So that's why most lawyers these days don't have a clue what the Constitution is... I see, their too busy playing solitaire and not paying attention. Hmm. like our crap public school system that graduates anyone our legal school do the same... that explains everything.

      Thanks,
      Leabre

  39. And the next story... by gold23 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Fired For Reading Slashdot Article About Worker Who Was Fired For Solitaire At Work

    --
    Trust not a man who's rich in flax / His morals may be sadly lax
    1. Re:And the next story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be new here, the next story is going to be "Fired for Solitare At Work" .. And yes, solitaire will still be spelled wrong.

  40. You're confused. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not a question of whether the company has a right to fire its employees for any reason. Bloomberg did nothing illegal, and everyone knows that. Can Bloomberg fire any of his employees for Solitaire breaks? Absolutely. Should he? That's another question.

    A "right" or accepted permission does not justify an action; it merely allows it.

    mnemonic_

  41. Not NYC - Albany by Joiseybill · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "...The Republican mayor stopped by the city's legislative office in Albany a few weeks ago ..." Cost of living in Albany is considerably lower than NYC. Original article also implies this guy had been reminded of the computer policies in 2004. Sounds like a repeat offender, and moreover he embarrassed the boss in front of company.

    1. Re:Not NYC - Albany by saforrest · · Score: 1

      Original article also implies this guy had been reminded of the computer policies in 2004. Sounds like a repeat offender, and moreover he embarrassed the boss in front of company.

      It said that he had reviewed the policies, which probably means that he along with all the other employees read and/or signed something saying they had read this documents.

      This is pretty standard, so that the signed document can be pulled out later in cases like this. But I didn't get the impression that he was a repeat offender.

    2. Re:Not NYC - Albany by NormalVisual · · Score: 3, Informative

      Original article also implies this guy had been reminded of the computer policies in 2004. Sounds like a repeat offender, and moreover he embarrassed the boss in front of company.

      No, what it said was, "The mayor's office said its records show that in 2004 Greenwood reviewed the policy that prohibits "inappropriate" use of city computers." That means that they gave everyone a written copy of the AUP and had everyone sign something saying they received a copy of it and read it, something that practically everyone that works in an office of any size does in this day and age. It doesn't in any way imply that he'd broken the rules at any time.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  42. here's how it really happened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Man wearing suit: Solitaire?

    Guy in cubicle, not looking up: Minesweeper

    Man wearing suit: Are you winning?

    Guy in cubicle, not looking up: Going for four in a row

    Man wearing suit: That's pretty good, isn't it?

    Guy in cubicle, not looking up: Yeah, it's great for Minesweeper, but I've gotten lots of practice

    Man wearing suit: How much practice?

    Guy in cubicle, not looking up: About six years

    Man wearing suit: How long have you worked here?

    Guy in cubicle: About six years.

    Guy in cubicle: Say, you look just like the Mayor. Hey, don't take it the wrong way or anything.

  43. All in doubt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah I think he was fired for other short comings outside of Solitaire.

    We fired a guy for taking home a 6 pack of beer home, the truth was it was an excuse to get rid of him - he was highly paid, unfortunately he was also highly incompetent and lazy.

  44. freedom in the workplace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    from the report:

    He created an office setup, which he repeated at City Hall, where everyone sits together in an open-air environment

    hmm, talk about boss looking over your shoulder with a stick in hand, mighty motivating

    the mayor said. "There's nothing wrong with taking a break, but during the business day, at your desk, that's not appropriate behavior."

    yeah right, employees should go out for golf to take a break

  45. At Will Employment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know about NY, but I live in Michigan which is an "at will" employment state. What does this mean? My employer can fire me at any time for *any* reason. At other employers people have been very publicly fired for being a smoker, even though they don't smoke at work, because they raise insurance costs.
    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/01/28/eveningn ews/main670168.shtml

    The only protections are for gender, religious or racial discrimination.

    Personally, I would *NEVER* play a game at work, (unless it was against the boss ;) )

  46. The submission says... by Khyber · · Score: 1

    A NEW YORK CITY EMPLOYEE. I certainly don't want my tax dollars (if I lived there) to go to waste. It's a little kinda over-obvious that he's lying, as we all know how slowly wheels turn. I'll bet solitaire is the leading cause of bureaucratic slowness. (endjoke)

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  47. Where is Kenneth Star when you need him? by iamacat · · Score: 1

    I bet if every second of Michael's "work" hours were videotaped, he would too be caught playing games, making personal phone calls or staring at his scantly clad secretaty. We need new Republican scandals badly...

    1. Re:Where is Kenneth Star when you need him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We need new Republican scandals badly...

      I don't think you want to add anymore to the flood. The American people are positively drowning in them. It's gotten so bad, well it had to happen.

  48. Its not Entrapment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're missing the point - its not IT's job to track down every single piece of unauthorized software. You sign an agreement not to screw around, and if caught doing so, get the shaft. IT doesn't have time to track down every game loaded on your PC.

    1. Re:Its not Entrapment by David_W · · Score: 1
      IT doesn't have time to track down every game loaded on your PC.

      Hmmm... but can you really make that argument when it was IT that loaded the game on there in the first place? (It comes with Windows, so if IT loaded the computer, they technically loaded the game.)

  49. Paid for 8 hours work or to be present for 8? by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

    The problem is that some employers fail to recognize that eight full hours of productivity isn't a realistic goal.

    If you are paid to *work* for 8 hours, rather than just be present for 8 hours, then it is an entirely realistic goal. If you need extra breaks be prepared to stay longer.

    1. Re:Paid for 8 hours work or to be present for 8? by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 5, Informative
      People need breaks. I know when I was working hourly I legally had half an hour for lunch and a few 15min breaks reguardless of what the company said.

      Now as a salaried employee, I constantly have slashdot, fark, etc open. On the other hand, I will read it, then do a bit of this, then read. In all honesty my productivity improves because to answer tough questions many times you have to distract yourself from them for a bit. (I am one of the most productive people in my group.) If the person wasn't playing solitare he'd be over in the other cube talking to a friend, getting some water, just roaming around, etc. That kind of thing has happened for AGES. To fire someone for playing a game for 5min is rediculious though it would be justifiable if the guy was always playing.

      --
      I do security
    2. Re:Paid for 8 hours work or to be present for 8? by sakusha · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I'll tell you a story from the earliest days of Solitaire, back when it just shipped (must be Win 2.0 IIRC) and way before the day of other timewasters like web surfing.

      I used to work in downtown LA. Due to the rush hours, it was pretty much impossible to leave until about 6:30, so I got used to staying late working. One afternoon, while I was on the phone on hold waiting for tech support to answer, I was playing solitaire while waiting, and my asshole boss caught me. He had a snit fit, and said if I could play solitaire while on hold, I could be doing something productive instead. I said that if I lose a game of solitaire because I had my attention divided between waiting on hold and a game, nothing was lost, but if he preferred me to do a half-assed job on my paperwork while I was on hold, I would be sure to do it that way. He told me, "if I EVER catch you playing solitaire on company time, you're fired instantly" and then he stomped away.
      I took him at his word. From that moment forward, every single day, I stopped working at precisely 5:00PM and played solitaire until I left the office. I spent all my lunch hour playing solitaire. From the moment I arrived in the office until 9:00AM, I played solitaire. I made sure the boss knew it too.
      Eventually the boss realized that he was losing more than 2 hours of my work capacity per day, and had no way to dock my salary since it was all after hours activities. I got called in for a conference. We had a heated argument about solitaire. I told him I needed a diversion occasionally throughout the day, usually while I was on hold, and that never amounted to more than a few minutes a day at times when I was tied down on the phone and couldn't do some other work, and wouldn't it make sense to allow me my little solitaire diversion? I won. Ha!

    3. Re:Paid for 8 hours work or to be present for 8? by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 1

      In addition to this, I rarely am working for only 8 hours. Like most people, I have to stay late, come in early, and show up some weekends.

      --
      I do security
    4. Re:Paid for 8 hours work or to be present for 8? by symbolic · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      It just goes to show that any two-bit jerk-off can call himself a manager. It's good that he finally saw the light, but being THAT IGNORANT from the get-go doesn't make for a positive company culture.

    5. Re:Paid for 8 hours work or to be present for 8? by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

      I had a sortof similar situation once.
      Due to internal injuries... well, to be blunt, I couldn't just have a half our lunch break - wolfing down food would make me sick, and I needed to use the bathroom for about 20 minutes after eating, etc.

      I had a supervisor who understood this, and she let me take an hour break for lunch in return for staying a half hour later each day - this worked out well since it helped keep the phones covered later too. Plus, since I used public transportation, I didn't get on the bus before then anyway... perfect solution.

      She left. New manager was outraged to discover that I had an hour for lunch, "everyone has to have the same rules," etc. No flexibility. I started getting "caught" spending my needed time in the bathroom. I explained again that that's why I had an hour lunch, etc. I got nothing but threats. Formal notification that I was to be back at my desk by 12:30, etc.
      So I started leaving the building immediately after I had been on the clock 8 hours.
      No more hanging around, no more extra half hour.

      The manager didn't think it through. About the third day of this he was monitoring the system wondering why the phones had gone nuts the last couple of days, and saw me with my jacket going for the door - ran to intercept me, said I needed to get back to the phones.

      "Sorry - since my lunch is now a half hour shorter, I leave a half hour earlier - I don't need the overtime."
      His faced dropped and I got the pleasure of seeing him realize that he had fucked himself. But of course, he wouldn't admit it...

      So in the end he ended up paying someone else overtime to fill the time I would have been working at the normal rate.

      --
      This space available.
    6. Re:Paid for 8 hours work or to be present for 8? by !equal · · Score: 1

      So, in other words, you are living at your job? Why even pay for an apartment or house? Just bring your bed and pillows to the job and you can save on a huge amount of gas money while being available 24/7 like any old good slave...uhm... hard worker would.

    7. Re:Paid for 8 hours work or to be present for 8? by benedict · · Score: 1

      And where do you work?

      --
      Ben "You have your mind on computers, it seems."
    8. Re:Paid for 8 hours work or to be present for 8? by sakusha · · Score: 1

      You are right, that was the most toxic company culture I ever worked at. I'll give you an example. One day, Mr. Asshole Manager ambushed me coming back from a smoke break, he came up to me and said "You Stink!" and sprayed a can of Lysol right in my face. I had to run to the bathroom and rinse my eyes out for 20 minutes before it stopped stinging.
      But I got even with him, when I busted him for embezzlement.

    9. Re:Paid for 8 hours work or to be present for 8? by cgenman · · Score: 1

      If you are paid to *work* for 8 hours, rather than just be present for 8 hours, then it is an entirely realistic goal.

      You may pay for your child to go to school, but that still stops on Sundays. You may pay for a live-in nanny, but s/he still has to sleep.

      The brain is a muscle. It consumes 25% of your body's calories. The best way to get performance out of a muscle is to contract, relax, contract, relax. During the relax phase nutrients are delivered to the muscle, proteins are rebuilt, and the muscle is prepared for its next contraction phase.

      Studies have shown that employees are the most productive overall when they spend %20 of their time offtask.

      By demanding 100% activity 100% of their time, you're reducing your employee's overall outputs while making them far less happy about their situations. It's a lose / lose situation.

    10. Re:Paid for 8 hours work or to be present for 8? by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      In my case at least, we are specifically not allowed to sleep anywhere on the campus (parking lot included). We have a gym, showers, cafe, etc. so everything else is there.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    11. Re:Paid for 8 hours work or to be present for 8? by shmlco · · Score: 1
      So? Read your email. Read a book or manual or trade rag. Prep for a meeting. Clean off your desk. Go take that note where it needs to be. Work on your rationale for getting a raise. Add a suggestion to the box. Rough out your next project. Check out what your competition is doing. File those papers. Fill out your expense report. Go to the supply room. Attend a webinar. Make a to do list. Do an item on your to do list.

      There are dozens upon dozens of sufficiently "offtask" change-of-viewpoint sharpen-the-saw things you could be doing... and playing games is not one of them.

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    12. Re:Paid for 8 hours work or to be present for 8? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are paid to *work* for 8 hours, rather than just be present for 8 hours, then it is an entirely realistic goal. If you need extra breaks be prepared to stay longer.

      Only if staying longer is the only way to keep the job and you want the job that bad. Employees should feel no ethical or moral obligation to work as hard as the employer might like, just as employers feel no ethical or moral obligation to pay their employees as much as they might like. Devoid of any ethical or moral constraints, each side will do what's in their best interest, and an employee who knows he's slacking off and getting away with it should feel no worse about that then an employer who knows it has its employees over a barrel. That's the free market, and what's good for the goose is good for the gander. Fsck the protestant work ethic. It does not apply in today's labor market.

    13. Re:Paid for 8 hours work or to be present for 8? by Nicolay77 · · Score: 1

      So, what's your record in seconds?

      I got a lucky one once and made 13 seconds in the small board.

      --
      We are Turing O-Machines. The Oracle is out there.
    14. Re:Paid for 8 hours work or to be present for 8? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just listed - what - 15,16 things, all of which are work related? How is filling out an expense report giving yourself a break from work/stress?

    15. Re:Paid for 8 hours work or to be present for 8? by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 1

      I guess that came out wrong. I do it when it is necessary, but, like one of my bosses once said, "My priorities are: Health, Family, Work."

      --
      I do security
    16. Re:Paid for 8 hours work or to be present for 8? by !equal · · Score: 1

      I forgot to wrap my post in tags.

  50. Did anyone get this guys name? by Eradicator2k3 · · Score: 0

    It's Edward Greenwood IX (the Ninth). I figured with a pretentious name like that he'd be all rich and powerful. Instead at $27,000 a year he comes across as that office's Milton wannabe. I can already hear his excuse:

    Edward Greenwood IX: I told Bill that if Sandra is going to listen to her headphones while she's filing, then I should be able to play solitaire while I'm collating so I don't see why I should get fired because I enjoy playing solitaire during my one-hour lunch or during quick breaks.

    What's next? Is he going to burn down the building?

    --
    Mr. T pitied this fool on 27 July 1992.
  51. like a teenager and a car... by SuperBanana · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Really now, don't you know that what you do at work WITH COMPANY RESOURCES is up to the (shock) COMPANY?

    Yep. It's like my parents and I when I was in high school:

    Mom: "Okay, what car are you taking?"

    Me: "My car."

    Dad: *COUGHAHEM*

    Me: "The car which I am permitted to use."

    Dad: "Have fun!"

    I see it all the time- employees get very posessive about their computers. The word "my" is thrown around very casually, they get attached to them, etc. Hell, I worked at places where people (almost exclusively sales staff) would take laptops with them when let go, and they'd act REALLY pissed when we called them and asked for them back. Some we had to literally harass the CRAP out of, to get machines returned- and when they were, they'd invariably be damaged, usually the keyboard and mouse/trackpad buttons; it was clear they whacked the shit out of it with a shoe or something just to piss us off.*

    It's equipment. Capital. I don't see a machine shop operator getting pissed when he's fired and he can't take the mill home with him...


    *I've also had to lock sales people out of databases WHILE they were getting "The Talk", because in the past, every single one of their predecessors had immediately logged in to the customer database from home and dumped it... un frigging believeable. Never had more trouble with terminated/let go employees than with sales dweebs/bimbos. ZERO morals, which I'd like to think was part of the reason they were fired.

    1. Re:like a teenager and a car... by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      We have a policy where assigned systems are signed out, with the understanding that damage due to avoidable negligence (which seems repetitive to me) can and will be taken from their final paycheck. In addition, upon leaving or termination, the final paycheck is held until all equipment is returned. There is rarely a problem with this, and to my knowledge, everyone's been pretty professional about it.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    2. Re:like a teenager and a car... by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      We've charged them with theft.

      We warned them, but some people are really dumb.

    3. Re:like a teenager and a car... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in California, you must be given your final check on your last day of work, unless you've quit with less than (IIRC) 72 hours notice.

      If they don't pay, they have to pay you a day's wages for every day that goes by... and the State Labor Board is pretty aggressive about it. A friend of mine got almost 2 weeks pay for nothing, because the boss was too lazy to cut a check outside the regular payroll cycle.

    4. Re:like a teenager and a car... by Phroggy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...sales dweebs/bimbos. ZERO morals, which I'd like to think was part of the reason they were fired.

      Or possibly the reason they were hired in the first place. Honesty doesn't make higher sales. ;-)

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    5. Re:like a teenager and a car... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Never had more trouble with terminated/let go employees than with sales dweebs/bimbos. ZERO morals, which I'd like to think was part of the reason they were fired.

      You misspelled hired.

    6. Re:like a teenager and a car... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      which I'd like to think was part of the reason they were fired.

      But it wasn't. Sales people are pure evil poured into a suit, sent to suck the souls from humanity. The absence of morals isn't the reason they were fired, it's the reason they were hired.

    7. Re:like a teenager and a car... by klubkid79 · · Score: 1

      Nods - our company at the moment is considering hiring a sales person to help out for the sole reason that we won't feel guilty if we have to fire them. True stuff.

    8. Re:like a teenager and a car... by MythMoth · · Score: 1

      While you're employees who do a job you don't do (and hence don't understand), perhaps you'd like to consider that sales people are the reason you get paid.

      --
      --- These are not words: wierd, genious, rediculous
    9. Re:like a teenager and a car... by MobKiller · · Score: 0

      Yeah right ! They're probably the company's greatest asset. What would they sell if there were nobody sweating in the shop producing whatever it is the sales department needs to sell ? What would they sell if nobody had designed the said product beforehand ? Who would buy it if it wasn't for the marketing dept. ?
      Even the janitor has his role in the company. This is a joint effort. It makes me sick to hear someone blabbering about his own importance/indispensibility in the company.

      I really hope your comment was meant to be ironic/sarcastic !

    10. Re:like a teenager and a car... by artg · · Score: 1

      Yes, I remember a company like that .. wanted their laptop off a friend.

      While she was spending her last few weeks in a hospice.

      Nice people : you won't need to remind me not to work for them.

  52. Bigwig by umbrellasd · · Score: 1

    Given the intelligence of some of the bigwigs these days, I think that load of BS might still work. Grunt: (load of BS) Bigwig: Ah, excellent work. I had wondered how we would solve that problem. Glad to see you're all on top of it.

  53. Lifetime Achievement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone that has worked in Government (as I do) can read between the lines. These are rarely the case of an employee just getting socked for something out of the blue. Do you realize how hard it is to fire people from Government? It's clear this was probably what we call 'lifetime achievement awards', where you have been walking the line for a while now and all it took was one more thing to move a person out.

  54. *clap* *clap* by Visceral+Monkey · · Score: 1

    What a BIG MAN Bloomberg is, I mean, how could anyone possibly fault him, right?

    There's a special place for people like this in hell, at least that's my fondest hope.

    Karmas a bitch.

    --
    *Fortitudo, aequitas, fidelitas.*
    1. Re:*clap* *clap* by Ndiin · · Score: 1

      How can you seriously claim that there's a special place in hell for him, and in the next line reference Karma? Seems a bit contradictory to me :)

      Perhaps though, in his next life [due to his bad karma], he'll be the lower-middle-class employee that gets fired for unproductivity in the workplace.

      -- Eric

    2. Re:*clap* *clap* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a BIG MAN Bloomberg is

      You've never seen him, obviously.

    3. Re:*clap* *clap* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, you gonna mod him down?

  55. it's a WORK environment by graveyardduckx · · Score: 0

    If you get caught playing games on the clock, you can expect these things. This is NOT news. When I worked at a small software company years ago, I was instructed to remove ALL games from ALL computers in the building. Anyone caught playing games would be removed. Of course they were all hypocrites since they (management) let me play Tribes and StarCraft with them for my entire shift some days... I guess it's good to have friend in higher positions.

  56. Solitare? by NokX · · Score: 1

    i play far cry and unreal tournament 2004 at work - i think i'd be sentenced to prison if they caught me. luckily my buddies are the system admins. :) in all seriousness though - if the company has a legal "contract" with you that you don't play ANY games at work, they have a right to fire you. it's their rules. do i think they should've given the guy a chance? of course, but it's not my show - it's theirs.

  57. I wish we could do that where I work by foQ · · Score: 1

    A couple of people play solitare all day long instead of doing productive things. They don't have any immediate work to do, but they could sure as hell stand to improve themselves in things other than playing solitare. A couple of people even have FPSes installed on their computers.

  58. Whoa, that's a tough pill to swallow by AaronPSU777 · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Greenwood, who earned $27,000 a year and had worked in the office for six years" That's a crying shame he lost that high-paying job, maybe he can move up in the world and get a job at McDonalds. Seriously though, 6 years and he's making $27,000 and still has to deal with crap about playing solitaire once in awhile? Bloomburg needs to lighten up a little.

    1. Re:Whoa, that's a tough pill to swallow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being a civil servant doesn't pay well unless you're on the take.

  59. What is this world coming to? by HeavensBlade23 · · Score: 1

    Fired for playing solitaire on the clock? Before you know it cats and dogs will be running around together and they'll start firing people for reading the newspaper on the toilet in the morning.

  60. Please by ThePuceGuardian · · Score: 1

    She was fired for some other reason - the Solitaire thing is a transparent excuse. Apart from the shining utopias some people here like to pretend they inhabit, most workplaces are run this way: the rules allow anyone to be fireable at any time, and are selectively enforced. The constant fear of losing their jobs is what keeps peons productive.

  61. Unrealistic expectations by Y-Crate · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Somehow I doubt the managers who love to fire people for "time-theft" of this nature are busy 100% of the time they are at work, and aren't the kind who take 2 hour lunches and skip out early on Fridays when they please. The more management creates and enforces rules against the most minute off-task behavior, the more their flagrant flaunting of such rules negatively impacts morale.

    The human mind is not designed to stay on one task for hour after hour without a few minutes of mental downtime, and failing to recognize this and not to simply expect productivity, but blind mechanical function in a sentient being is not only wrong but fails to deliver the intended results.

    It's a sad state of affairs when you realize that many people in their position tend to have a more anthropomorphic view of their pets than their employees.

  62. Smokers...? by heli0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... are allowed to take a 5-10 minute break every hour in order to get their fix? Is someone waiting outside to fire them for wasting time?

    --
    Whenever the offence inspires less horror than the punishment, the rigour of penal law is obliged to give way...
    1. Re:Smokers...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try going outside a few times a day for a "non-smoking break", and see what sort of reaction you get.

      Many office smokers keep the habit largely because it's the only way to get a few breaks a day without catching heat.

    2. Re:Smokers...? by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      Every hour? Where I live the mandatory break time is 15 mins in the morning and 15 in the afternoon.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    3. Re:Smokers...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      If you work for a private company, you are allowed 30 minutes every five hours if you are getting paid hourly. If you are civil service union employee, you get 30 minutes for a 6 to 7.5 hour work day, typcially. I don't know where you live, but none of the public buildings in my state allow smoking in or near the premises. Stop bringing this up as a comparison. None of the smokers I know at work are unproductive, nor do they take an excessive amount of leave time. In fact, they tend to be nervous people who don't like to go home unless things are "just right".

      I see an awful lot of speculation, but as of this point in the replies, I don't see anyone remotely aware of how it's like to work in the heavily unionized public sector. I'm a public sector employee, and likely in the same union as this guy. It is *very* hard to get fired. There are allowances for just about everything. About the only way to get fired is to break the law, or to disobey a direct order from your superiors. Even if there is the possibility you could hurt yourself, you at least have to try.

      This guy obviously continued to disobey an order, and he likely had more than one warning that goofing off with games during regular work hours is against policy. My guess is that his supervisor specifically told him not to do it when Bloomberg made his visit, but he did it anyway. Honestly, this guy's supervisor must have been completely humiliated about this.

      I know that smoking is a mortal sin according to the current Edicts of the Church of Socialism, but I've been around long enough, and worked a variety of jobs to know that workers don't need a cigarette in their hand to be soldiering. I see plenty of time-wasting going on, whether it be gabbing on the phone, conducting business on eBay, chewin' the rag by the ol' water cooler, purposely finding any reason to walk (slowly) out of the office to pick up or deliver various items, or reading a book -- The heavy overhead of socialism is making it a hell of a lot harder to do nothing and still collect a high wage.

    4. Re:Smokers...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow, I get more breaks than that. I get 15 minutes in the morning, 15 minutes in the afternoon, and 15 minutes in the evening and finally 15 minutes before I leave.

      Oh, did I mention about my one hour special break that I use to eat and soil at the same time? Management called it, "time-share."

    5. Re:Smokers...? by houghi · · Score: 1

      Where I am you get one break in the morning and one break in the afternoon. Wether you use that to take a smoke or to do that other drug, coffee, is entirely up to you. 15 minutes in the morning and 15 in the afternoon.

      If you work at a company that gives 5-10 minutes breaks per HOUR, just walk with them and stand there non-smoking.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    6. Re:Smokers...? by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      "Where I am you get one break in the morning and one break in the afternoon.

      Where I work you have coffee/drinks at your workstation and "personal but not excessive" computer/phone/company resources time is allowed (including long-distance calls to family on holidays). If I had to work for another "babysitter" bureaucracy again I'd shoot myself. Smart managers know happy employees are productive employees, and miserable employees do the bare minimum necessary to do their jobs.

    7. Re:Smokers...? by StarkRG · · Score: 1

      Hmm, can internet addicts take a 5-10 minute internet break? Actually, it seems to be exactly the opposite, not only is there no break, but many times the internet is either nonexistant or, at best, severely restricted...

    8. Re:Smokers...? by vwidiot · · Score: 1

      I don't know where you work but if a smoker took a 5-10 minute break every hour at my company he or she would be history. As a smoker I take 2 15 minute breaks in an 8 hour shift and a 1 hour lunch.

  63. years/wage/warnings/good! by itzdandy · · Score: 1

    after 6 years of work for just $27,000, it's time to move on! not to mention that employee's are allowed by law in all states, fair break periods.

    now the computer use policy is a binding labor contract(if signed or whitnessed) but a warning is generally considered necessary before termination!

    anyway, $27k isn't enough for 6 years of experience.

    1. Re:years/wage/warnings/good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know this may sound pathetic, but I make $13k a year---and my `union' (if one can call it that) roster says I'll be making whole $18k after just 9 more years.

  64. The media goes political again, Go figure. by thx1138_az · · Score: 1

    > The Republican mayor stopped by the city's legislative office in Albany a few weeks ago when he was visiting the state Capitol to hear the governor's State of the State address.

    There are 3 sides to every story: his side, her side and the truth. Now what that politics is involved, I can't beleive this story as truth.

    1. Re:The media goes political again, Go figure. by Winlin · · Score: 1

      I don't know...it seems to be pretty accepted practice when a news story is about a politician to mention his party. At least my local paper always sticks that in there, no matter which party it is.

    2. Re:The media goes political again, Go figure. by thx1138_az · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's the prototypical big mean rich republician squashes the innocent little poor guy news piece. It's meant to incite class envy and to increase a reader base for the reporter/news agency. Here's more...

      > ...But the eagle-eyed mayor - a billionaire former businessman with a certain idea of how offices should be run - noticed Greenwood's game of solitaire glowing on his screen...

      > ..."It's not like I'm the only one that ever did this," said the 39-year-old father of a toddler.

    3. Re:The media goes political again, Go figure. by thelizman · · Score: 1

      The accepted practice is to identify them by the office they hold. Identifying their political party is more or less done at the whim of the reporter, and in many cases its done with an eye towards marginalizing the person or the political party. I can think of sever glaring examples, such as how ABCCBSNBCCNN all identified Congressman Gary Condit as "R, CA" when he was in fact "D, CA". When pressed, all three news agencies fingered AP for the fault. The AP reporter sheepishly replied that the R was for "Representative".

      There is not AP format for identifying politicians by party or constituency.

  65. A similar story... by fm6 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    One day Henry Ford was walking through his factory, when he saw a worker slouched on a crate, trimming a wire in what Ford considered to be a clumsy manner. Ford kicked the crate out from under the worker and yelled, "Get out of my factory! You're fired."

    "But Mr. Ford! You can't fire me!"

    "Why the hell not?"

    "I don't work for you! I work for the phone company!"

    1. Re:A similar story... by ILikeRed · · Score: 1

      I've also heard stories of Ford sending managers to workers homes to make sure they did not have a competitor's vehicle, had their lawn trimmed, the kids had good clothes, they were not drinking too much after work, & etc. I would not have a problem passing such an inspection, but still not someone I would want to work for.

      --
      I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm, and three or more is a congress -J Adams
    2. Re:A similar story... by Darth_brooks · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Do some reading about "Harry Bennett", who was Ford's union buster.

      Ford was definatly a genius, but with genius comes serious eccentricities. He held very firm beliefs about the "working class" and how they should be treated (and in return how they should act.) An extension of that feeling was his belief that the "international jew" was conspiring against the working man.

      He was also quite shrewd. Read the fine print about the "five dollar day." You didn't just get a job, work a day, and walk out the door with a five dollar bill. You had to be a clean living family man (by Ford's standards) and even then, you still made the standard factory wages (two-ish dollars a day). the "Five dollar day" came from the bonus you received after a set period of employment. A bonus that usually spent on....the purchase of a Ford vehicle.

      It didn't help that Ford was effectivly senile for the last ten or so years of his life. Fascinating man, but also bat-shit insane.

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    3. Re:A similar story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      definitely. Think of it as containing the word "finite"--once I thought of it that way, I never misspelled it again.

    4. Re:A similar story... by Kurt+Granroth · · Score: 3, Funny

      That sounds like a variant of a similar joke:

      A new manager is hired to bring an underproducing office up to speed. He decides that he must fire somebody on the first day to show that he means business. While walking through the office, he spots a man leaning against the wall, not doing anything. He is in a room full of workers and so decides that this is the perfect way to start.

      "You! How much do you make a week?", he bellowed at the slacker.
      "About $300," came the reply.

      The manager pulls out his wallet, peels off three hundred dollar bills, and throws them at the man.

      "Here's your money. Now get out and don't come back!"

      Feeling pretty good about the firing, he glared around room. "What was this man's job?", he asked.

      From the back of the room came the reply: "Pizza delivery man"

    5. Re:A similar story... by birge · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      As bad as the original Ford was in terms of labor, I can't help but notice that back then our car industry was the envy of the world. Now that we've got unionized auto workers making more than a college professor and working fewer hours than a banker, our auto industry is in shambles. I'm not saying the old extreme was good, but I think the pendulum has swung a bit far in terms of employee's sense of entitlement.

    6. Re:A similar story... by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Dude, they have labor unions in Japan, Korea, and Germany too. In Germany, the unions are actually a lot stronger than they are in the U.S.

    7. Re:A similar story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't want to be flamebait here, but.

      The quality of American cars has not gone down, quite the opposite.

      The trouble is that European, Japanese and Korean manufacturers have improved their quality a lot more.

    8. Re:A similar story... by curious.corn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Dude you're wrong. It's not the workers that wrecked your auto industry, it's the management. The USA automotive industry develops mostly for the domestic market and there's no way in hell an american car will ever sell on the worldwide marketplace. Your cars are too focused on your national taste and distant from the EU, developing countries or Asia. US cars are generally speaking gargantuan, auto-drive, semi-trucks; such platforms are impossible to reengineer for foreign markets from which you have more or less cut yourself out. Add up some ferocious competition in a mature, saturated industry and some quality control issues and there is your recipe for disaster. Mind you, I'm italian and we have the exact same problem here with FIAT, rescaled appropriately.

      --
      Mi domando chi à il mandante di tutte le cazzate che faccio - Altan
    9. Re:A similar story... by birge · · Score: 1
      I disagree. Picking a market to design towards is not a mistake, especially when it's one as big as the American car market. Trying to make a car that appeals to the entire world might be. The problem is that not even Americans like American cars. You are right that the quality is terrible.

      While management is certainly not without culpability here, I think one of the biggest reasons for the low quality is labor, both directly and in the sense that corners constantly need to be cut in order to be price competitive despite the HUGE overhead of American labor. We've got entire factories in America that are pretty much idle but where every factory worker had to be paid a full salary just because of union contracts making it impossible to layoff people. It's ridiculous, and it's no surprise that we can't make a car anybody wants to buy. You pay for a Ford and your money goes partly towards the car, and largely towards idle union workers and generous healthcare and pensions.

      The same is true for BMW, which has to deal with the German labor market, but they make premium cars and yuppies don't care they're getting ripped off. But American cars manufacturers don't have the luxury of having a core market of people with six figure incomes. Given that reality, I think it's fair to say that their horrendous labor costs are a significant reason for their demise.

    10. Re:A similar story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Certainly the high cost of labor factors in, but the factories wouldn't be so idle if the cars were higher quality. Toyotas and Hondas manufactured here don't seem to be destroying their respective company's reputation or profit margin.

    11. Re:A similar story... by birge · · Score: 1

      Glad you brought that up. Toyota and Honda factories in America are some of the few that aren't unionized.

    12. Re:A similar story... by VAXcat · · Score: 1

      Heck, I was consulting at a site once, doing some contract work on a MicroVAX being used for office automation, when the VP of IT came through, he insisted I come with him, and marched me into the room where the MicroVAX was. He launched into a 45 minute diatribe about how much he hated the machine, the business practices of DEC, and the field service as well. I was a little puzzled, but let him go on as long as he wanted. At the end, I could tell he was expecting a reply. It dawned on me, he thought I was a DEC employee, and wanted to hear what I had to say in defense. Instead, I told him, that I was a contractor here doing some work on the thing, not a DEC employee, and all he'd accomplished was wasting 0.75 hours I certainly was planning to bill him for. He started to turn red, but the manager who'd contracted me in showed up then and talked the guy down.

      --
      There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
    13. Re:A similar story... by fm6 · · Score: 1
      He'd be right at home on Slashdot...

      I have to point out that even if you had been a DEC person, screaming at you for 45 minutes still wouldn't have accomplished anything. But then, self-righteous anger is its own justification, as Fox News and a whole generation of brain-dead radio pundits have learned.

    14. Re:A similar story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      neither is Saturn - GM's non-union expirament

  66. The real question is..... by acoustix · · Score: 1

    Why did they have the games installed on the pc in the first place? This is an office computer, correct? Then only have the packages installed that you need. I usually unistall Games, Mouse Pointers, MSN Explorer, Outlook Express, and Messenger when I deploy systems. If there's no need for the software then it's not installed.

    We should be asking these questions to the NYC IT staff.

    -Nick

    --
    "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    1. Re:The real question is..... by TeknoHog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why should an operating system's default install include games in the first place? Especially a professional edition? Besides, isn't it unfair competition against other game vendors?-)

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    2. Re:The real question is..... by Detritus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      User training. Teaching new users how to use a mouse and the basic operations of a GUI. It may seem archaic now, but think back when everyone was switching from DOS/WordPerfect/Lotus-123 to Windows.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    3. Re:The real question is..... by uberjoe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This might be an urban legend, but I always heard that MS included solitaire to teach people the funtamentals of 'double-click' and 'click-and-drag'. I also seem to remember Apple including a sort of adeventure game on the Apple II gs to teach users similar skills.

      --

      The days of the digital watch are numbered.

    4. Re:The real question is..... by freeweed · · Score: 1

      I'd agree, if this was still 1995. Solitaire saved the company I was working at literally tens of thousands of dollars in training costs. We let everyone play to their heart's content (no pun intended) so long as their work got done.

      However, why does a "Professional" OS, released many years later, still have this? Do we still have a bunch of companies migrating from Wordperfect 5.1 with users who have managed to avoid a mouse for a decade? I say this coming from an AS/400 shop, and even WE know how to use mice :)

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    5. Re:The real question is..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why didn't the IT staff remove the games. From memory sysoc.inf can be edited such that all the games and messenger can be simply uninstalled.

  67. It's everywhere by cyranoVR · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was walking down the street here in NYC and noticed a police van with the door open. Looked in and saw one of those nifty in-car laptops...

    Yup, they had left their Windows Solitaire game up on the screen.

  68. American spelling bee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your just a looser who is jelous of someone that worked thier way to the top

    I fine example of American spelling.

  69. Foolishness by alricsca · · Score: 1

    It has been proven time and time again that becoming too draconian at work about personal computer time costs more money than it ever saves. Would you rather have a person take a day off due to stress, to find a nanny, to pay a bill, to have an important conversation or to write a letter because that is what they must do. We are talkings nearly a week of lost time a year that could be saved and a huge benefit derived from reduced stress levels. In addition, people tend to leave their work space when they cannot take a little personal time on the computer. That means no one to handle an important task, answer a call or message. The problem is that supervisors often ignore the benefits of personal computer use while pointing out all the so called wasted time. It always better to have someone at their stations whenever possible and the less time taken off for things they can handle via a IM or e-mail the better. Any good supervisor can tell when something is not getting done as fast as they should be and deal with it but too many are downright pathetic control freaks or worse have this vision that work is all about pure labor the entire time one is in an office as if they have ever done that. The other thing that gets me is owners want to pay chump wages for jobs but then expect the person to work 100% of the time. I am talking about titles like receptionist. I often hear things like instead of playing games go make copies, clean your desk, or make coffee. Now that is all fine and dandy so pay the person to be the cleaning staff and your personal waitress too otherwise shut up and be glad you are getting away on the cheap.

    BTW: I have been a supervisor of development groups in four countries for the past five years, I know of what I speak. People who manage this way are fools. In fact, I find that when you start to hear a generalized complaints about people wasting time you need to talk to the supervisors as the problem will be them mishandling time and tasks and is almost never with the staff who are goofing off. I think in my entire life, I have only found one person that truly was a problem user, and even then I had to ask myself why was this person hired in the first place.

  70. Joke by Lord51N15T3R · · Score: 0
    Reminds me of that cartoon.

    Has a secretary with playing solitare at her desk which is covered with a bunch of playing cards.

    She says, "The computers broke down so I had to to my work manually."

  71. At the risk of sounding unpopular... by tehlinux · · Score: 1

    Now the guy has plenty of time to play solitaire.

    --
    Most linux users don't know this, but the man pages were named after Chuck Norris. Chuck Norris fsck'ing hates noobs!
  72. Just because you can, doesn't mean you should by fm6 · · Score: 1
    Sure, you can sanction your employees for misusing company resources. But the sanctions ought to be proportional to the offense. A proportional response is not required by law, but common sense is another matter.

    What Bloomberg did costs NYC. And not a small amount. They'll have to find, hire, and train a replacement. They'll lose whatever undocumented knowledge is in the fired guy's brain. And Hizonner lost the goodwill of any co-workers who thought they guy got a bum deal.

    "Zero tolerance" is by and for idiots. You catch somebody in a minor infraction, you take them aside and give them a talking to. You don't get really nasty until it becomes obvious that an employee doesn't give a shit for the rules. Any other approach makes you feel good, but runs your operation into the ground.

    1. Re:Just because you can, doesn't mean you should by Limecron · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not that I entirely disagree with you, but a guy who worked at the same job in NYC for 6 years and was only making $27,000/yr was not exactly part of their brain trust.

      Many entry-level retail employees in NYC make $27,000/yr.

  73. Bloomberg isn't that great a mayor anyhow by C_Kode · · Score: 1

    I'm not a huge fan of Rudy Giuliani the person, but as a mayor and what he did for New York (I'm not talking about 9/11 I mean how he cleaned up the sesspool that was New York) he was a great major. He makes Bloomberg a cut rate second class salesmen IMHO. I believe this guy played a lot more Solitare (or done other things) than he claimed, but he should have been reprimanded as he noted rather than just flat out fired. Of course, this where were people like Bloomberg come from. There business sense is win or die trying. Those that don't give 100% all the time are hurting the business. I admit, type A people (Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Larry Ellison, the Google guys, etc) are more apt to succeed, but not everyone is type A. This guy has a small baby and Bloomberg just cans him with *real* cause. It's a shame, but this guy is better off. $27k isn't that much. He should be able to do better with some initiative. I couldn't imagine this guy living in the NYC area and surviving on $27k with a toddler....

  74. Am I alone here? by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else get the sudden urge to open Klondike when they read the headline?

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
  75. Solitaire Schmolitaire by Toxictoy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Back in 1998 I was working in a helpdesk and a user who was known to be a chronic complainer called saying that she couldn't do her work as there was something wrong with MS Word. We were able to remote control workstations without users having to give permission so I connected to her workstation and what did I see?? Solitaire. Rather than let her know I could see what she was doing I kept asking her about her screen and what she could see on it - all she was doing was giving me ficticious error messages and she was actually continuing her game while she was talking to me. How I resolved the problem was to move her cards around for her and then open MS Office. Once it was open I asked her if there were any other problems she wanted to talk about. After a long silence she said "No- thank you for helping me" and hung up the phone. Needless to say we didn't hear anything from her for a while.

    1. Re:Solitaire Schmolitaire by laing · · Score: 3, Informative

      This reminds me of the old SUN3 workstations. There was almost no security. You could remotely log into another machine, do a "screendump" to an NFS shared partition, and then do a "screenload" on your local workstation to see what anyone was doing anywhere. We used it to look at the managment plan to outsource our entire division to another state and knew about the plan 2 weeks before it was announced.

    2. Re:Solitaire Schmolitaire by Firehed · · Score: 1
      But did you do the "nukedb" before the announcement as a thank-you?

      Seriously, people, why not minesweeper? Nobody suspects it, and it actually requires thinking. Solitaire is just knowing two colors and how to count to 13; minesweeper requires logic. Surely improving your thinking skills is a better excuse than the somewhere-above (excellent) mouse-calibration cover that Solitaire used to offer.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    3. Re:Solitaire Schmolitaire by SuperQ · · Score: 1

      Hell yea.. a bit of logical reasoning can get you out of a lot of stuck games of minesweeper. I think my record for expert is under 100 seconds.

  76. It's time for everyone to open their eyes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Selling your life away one year at a time for $27,000 -- is that worth it? Hell no. Fuck Michael Bloomberg and other employers. Workers, it's time to revolt.. this shit can't go on.. the owners and business runners are fucked without us.. it's time to get better pay and better rights or forcibly start this all over. Don't become apathetic and say "oh well it's not THAT bad," because it fucking IS that bad.

    1. Re:It's time for everyone to open their eyes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not as fucked as you are without us. STFU and GBTW.

    2. Re:It's time for everyone to open their eyes by thx1138_az · · Score: 1

      In a sad way he's right. But he wants to go about it the wrong way. You can't make an employer pay you more or treat you better. Do what I did and work for yourself. I work as a consultant on the side but I also still work for my company too. I treat my employer like one of my customers. That is to say I kiss their butts and make them happy. I treat my customers the same way. It's not about independance or dependace but interdependance.

  77. My eyes glaze over ... by Wansu · · Score: 1


    ... when I stare at code too long. A change of pace can freshen my perspective. Yeah, I'm being paid to work but this ain't production work. There's no standard idea rate. You can work for hours or days tracking down a bug and then, in a sudden burst of insight, find it. That's the nature of the work. It tends to come in fits and starts.

    Now that computer work has "matured", there are people with the same mentality as grocery store managers becoming IT managers and trying to improve efficiency by cracking down on goofing off. They succeed in turning the workplace into a pressure cooker.

    Where is the new cutting edge field where a geek can be a free spirit?

    --
    Wansu, th' chinese sailor
  78. MOD PARENT UP! by nsayer · · Score: 1

    Best. Support. Story. Ever.

    And I don't make MPU posts hardly ever.

  79. Re:Solitare used to be my wallpaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's showing em /waves fist/. Make sure they don't take your Swingline.

  80. Office Aide? WTF is that? by layer3switch · · Score: 1

    Perhaps there is more story than this, but with limited budget on the rise for NYC, perhaps this was just a sorry ass excuse to cut down on some of the spending by the Office. After all, NY is "hire-at-will" state. Another word, you don't need a reason to get fired in the state of New York.

    But most importantly...

    Rather you are productive or not, what make you think, you are not a disposable worker at your work? We all are. Human Resource is just another asset to the company, and it can be bought and sold just like everything else. Don't be fooled by the words like "Teamwork" and "Loyalty." Our career is not defined by the company, but what we do for the company. Last thing you want to do is like Greenwood, "I should have been warned, not fired for first offense..." If you are fired, well then fuck them. Get a better job, take your experience and move on. Attachment of emotional feelings like "Loyalty and Teamwork" only makes us a better target for practice screwing by upper management. I am not at all being disgruntle, but being realistic.

    A job that treats you like an asset that can be bought and sold, you should return the favor by treating it like a temporary housing you just can't wait to get the fuck out of.

    --
    "Don't let fools fool you. They are the clever ones."
  81. Excuse me, but ... by constantnormal · · Score: 1

    ... what kind of job pays $27K per year in NYC?

    Can a person even LIVE on that?

    I was under the impression that it was kinda expensive to live in the Big Apple.

    But maybe he commuted in from Westchester or Connecticut ... ... or slept in the office.

    1. Re:Excuse me, but ... by layer3switch · · Score: 1

      It's called "Ghetto" and "Public Housing." In NYC, every building has to reserve a certain sections or rent out some portion of apartments to low income families at very low rate.

      For instance, a building I was living in downtown NYC (a block away from Wall St. on Broadway), a studio can go up to 2 grand a month on rent. A low income (qualified) resident can get that same apartment at a fraction of 2 grand. For some old buildings, there are tenants still paying rent only you and i can dream of (like 300 bucks a month at prime location in Manhattan) due to rent stabilization. So you may ask, "WTF, is that fair for the building owners?" Well, it is since, building owners gets huge chunk of city property tax deduction off of it. However some location realestate is just so hot and expensive, not even tax break can make up for the loss in rent according to the square footage.

      --
      "Don't let fools fool you. They are the clever ones."
    2. Re:Excuse me, but ... by JoeF · · Score: 1

      Geez, you obviously didn't RFA.
      The job is in Albany, not NYC. NYC Administration has an office in Albany.

  82. Let me summarise by shintaro · · Score: 1

    Those who think Bloomberg is right, will mostly be business owners. Not managers, owners. Those who think Bloomberg is wrong, are /. regulars.

  83. This goes throughout history... by LordRPI · · Score: 1
    Reading over the comments, I was cheerfully reminded of a short story I read in High school called "Bartleby the Scrivener."

    What the Wikipedia summary does not describe is that the original two scriveners have work problems. I can't remember which way exactly, but one scrivener couldn't do any work before eating and the other one got sloshed at lunch so they essentially traded productivity in the morning and afternoon. Now Barleby did no work at all. It's those kinds of people you have to watch out for.

  84. Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Couple of summers ago, when i had a working laptop, i played over 875 games during a summer. Had an hour rail trip to and from work for the summer. Over 600 wins. The statistics screen scared me at the end of the summer. Now, same trip, gameboy micro... now i play too much jeopardy...

  85. If Bloomberg were REALLY serious... by Chordonblue · · Score: 1

    ...He'd have the IT guy's head for allowing Solitare in the first place. If it's that mission critical not to have games in the office, it should be the job of the IT head to insure that only authorized apps get installed.

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
    1. Re:If Bloomberg were REALLY serious... by Pyrion · · Score: 1

      If Bloomberg were really serious, IT would've gotten rid of Solitaire years ago. It's not like he just now got elected, ya know...

      --
      "There is much pleasure to be gained from useless knowledge." - Bertrand Russell.
  86. Software rollout by Anti-Trend · · Score: 1
    If solitaire was in the default software rollout, maybe policy should have been changed rather than singling out one employee. Of course, this is just another form of baby-kissing. IMHO the mayor was clearly trying to show the press that he was a tough mayor, willing to make tough decisions in the interests of being a good steward of NYC's tax money.

    Then again, it could be that he was just embarrased that an employee so low on the totem pole messed up his dog and pony show.

    --
    Working in a DevOps shop is like playing in a band made up entirely of keytarists.
  87. Delete the games by HangingChad · · Score: 1
    You'd think a user the size if the city of New York would have a custom disk image that didn't include games if it was that big of a deal. Leave games on their PC's but fire them for playing them. Not right. It's not like solitaire is integrated into the OS.

    Besides, he got fired from a 27K job, in New York. How hard could that be to replace?

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:Delete the games by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 2, Funny

      Besides, he got fired from a 27K job, in New York. How hard could that be to replace?

      For someone with 6 years of Solitare experience?

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

  88. not so bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in other news, he's not SO bad. an anonymous donation of 100 million dollars was just leaked by AP to have come from the mayor of NY himself. in the past, he's given another 100 million not anonymously, and other anonymous misc. donations of at least 10 or 20 million.

    not *such* a bad guy afterall.

  89. News? by jasen666 · · Score: 1

    Why is this news? Every employer I've ever worked for would have fired me for playing games on company time.

    1. Re:News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Legally mandated breaks aren't "company time."

    2. Re:News? by jasen666 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, of course HE says "it was only on breaks, I promise".
      You're going to assume he's being completely honest?
      RTFA. He says if he was working hard for a couple hours he would stop and get some coffee and play a game for a bit. Therefore not only on "legal" breaks.

  90. Not as bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as being expelled from school because you printed a newsletter, tho'.

  91. Also lost my job. by Gunslinger47 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I also lost an office job a long while back. They never gave me a reason when they told me it "wasn't working out", but I've learned the details about it recently. Turns out the reason was because the logs showed that I surfed the Internet "three times" in one day. Non-coincidentally, my two coffee-breaks and one lunch break add up to having a break "three times" a day.

    It's such total BS that I'm tempted to call the union, but I won't. The job sucked, and I'm glad to have it behind me.

  92. Job Security by gavinroy · · Score: 1

    In my office, there is a guy who has a really good job security... being friends with one of the owners. This guy has solitaire up on his computer so often it's the running joke in the office. It's really shocking to walk by his open office door without seeing solitaire up on his screen.

  93. BOSS KEY by Loopy · · Score: 1

    Um, clearly a n00b that didn't even know about the BOSS key? /laugh

  94. And now ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hes playing solitaire at home.

  95. Fire Himself first. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The mayor should first fire himself,
    for having a lack of understanding and control over his cities I.T. infrastructure.

    Many companies I know have Windows and office on the PCs, with everything else locked down.

    No games, no downloading of programs or toolbars, and many PCs have zero internet access.

    The Mayor is the one who should set policy for IT system deployments.

    Instead of point a finger at one man, the Mayor should figure out just how much of a techno-dinosaur he himself is, and ask questions.

    What's next? Will the mayor get Mohammed cartoon T-Shirts for all of his staff members?

    Mayor = DOLT
    Former Employee= Better off getting a real job (with better pay!)
    Also = should sue for discrimination and hate crimes, like this ONE guy is the only employee ever to play solitare? come on... Feel the discrimination!

  96. This kind of thing makes certain that.... by ezratrumpet · · Score: 1

    ....employees leave promptly at the end of their eight-hour work day, having faithfully taken the prescribed 15 minute break every two hours, the full sixty minutes for lunch, and a bathroom break as often as possible.

    This sort of policing is much, much more trouble than it's worth in the long run. Instead of staying late, taking work home, and so forth - employees determine what they must do to keep their jobs, do ONLY that, and nothing else - ever.

  97. for reading /. ? by slashdotmsiriv · · Score: 1

    I am waiting for the "man fired for reading \." article ...

    1. Re:for reading /. ? by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      My boss and I discuss what we've read on /., and occasionally even point out stuff as things we might want to look into.

      Of course, we also watch movies on a 42" plasma in our work area through the day, and our department is more efficient than it has ever been - not just an exaggeration... there were some... rather incompetent people here before us, who are almost all gone, but for one who lingers like a bad smell. But anyway.

    2. Re:for reading /. ? by n6kuy · · Score: 1

      > ... reading \. ...

      Hey there really IS a backslashdot.org!

      --
      If you disagree with me on social issues, then it's pretty clear that you are a narrow-minded bigot.
  98. Should've been fired by audacity242 · · Score: 1

    This guy is an idiot. Every single place I've worked at has a very clear computer policy, you know what consequences you face if you disobey it.

    And I seriously doubt his few minutes here and there were harmless. For one thing, it was probably a significant amount of time. I just timed myself playing solitaire, it took me 60 seconds to get stuck. It takes a fair bit longer than that to win most games. He was probably wasting a significant amount of time. Also, the federal government mandates that we get periodic times to goof off, they're called breaks. If you need more than that, something's wrong.

    As for the people saying it's impossible to be productive 8 hours a day...I call BS. You're trying to slack off. Come up against a wall with one project? Work on another, don't goof off. Get caught up on your filing if you need some time away from something that's frustrating you.

    Earn your money, people.

    1. Re:Should've been fired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The guy might be an idiot, but you're definitely an asshole.

  99. He's not undeserving because he's lazy by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    He's undeserving because he does not act in a manner befitting the power and wealth society entrusts in him. When you reach a certain level of wealth it ceases to be material goods and becomes raw power. Bloomberg has reached that stage. In a functional capitalist society those entrusted with such power are responsible and even-handed. In America they fire people for 5 minutes of solitare.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  100. lol by majortom1981 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    To bad the didnt say the whole story . It was in newsday. HE was underperforming.

    Also that office was getting downsized.

    That was just the icing on the cake. He was not fired unjustly.

    Boy to people overreact

    1. Re:LOL by epee1221 · · Score: 1

      Great way to make yourself sound smart....
      As nice as it might be to relocate to Canada, I am intelligent enough to realize that I don't have enough money to do so. I find that it's very easy to tell somebody to do something drastic when you aren't involved at all in any of the cost.

      On a similar note, if you go shoot yourself in the face, you won't have to listen to people whine anymore. I am not, however, callous enough to suggest that you do this. Then again, after this post, I bet I could go find three or four people who are.

      --
      "The use-mention distinction" is not "enforced here."
    2. Re:LOL by Catbeller · · Score: 0, Troll

      Seig Heil.

    3. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's "Sieg heil".

      Regards,
      Spelling nazi

    4. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh god that's funny.

    5. Re:LOL by Babillon · · Score: 1

      In fac, you found one. This is sound advice for someone with so bleak an outlook on everything. You poor soul. Cry your emo tears in the bathtub, it'll cost less.

    6. Re:LOL by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      Assuming you are serious in your desire to leave the US for Canada, why would the logistics be anyone's problem but your own? It's not society's responsibility to put you in a pasture where you think there is greener grass.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    7. Re:LOL by Lockejaw · · Score: 1

      The issue here is that the country is alienating its citizens. It is the duty of a democracy to be inclusive.
      No, it's not society's job to move individual's to greener pastures -- it's society's job to make the current pasture greener.

      --
      (IANAL)
  101. LOL, Perp Atuitie (919967) is PWNED! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not just owned, but FUCKIN PWNED!

  102. My worst boss ever... by BiAthlon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I was an independant consultant I had the worst boss I've ever had in my life. I got no vacation days, he made me go to work when I was sick, and the bastard was on my ass all the time to find the next gig before the current one was up.

    I will never by my own boss again, I'm an asshole.

    1. Re:My worst boss ever... by titzandkunt · · Score: 1


      "...When I was an independant consultant I had the worst boss I've ever had in my life. I got no vacation days, he made me go to work when I was sick, and the bastard was on my ass all the time to find the next gig before the current one was up..."

      But on the plus side I bet the boss provided you with non-stop hotter-than-hot sex...

      T&K.

      --
      Political language ... is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable...
    2. Re:My worst boss ever... by rollingcalf · · Score: 1

      If you're an independent consultant you don't have a boss, you have clients.

      --
      ---------
      There is inferior bacteria on the interior of your posterior.
  103. Literally... by XanC · · Score: 2, Interesting

    harrased the crap out of them? That must be messy!

  104. He's going about it all wrong... by Gadren · · Score: 1

    If you're going to get in trouble for playing games at work, then don't have it be Solitaire. As Maddox said, Solitaire is a waste of time. It's a mindless boring game.
    I mean, at least do something brain-building like Minesweeper -- that way if you're caught you can say that you're improving your analytical skills or something.

  105. he was going to get layed off anyway by majortom1981 · · Score: 1

    Like I said . He was going to get laid off anyway. THe solitaire made it happen quicker.

  106. This is why I keep Sudoku on my Palm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I take a 30-minute break on the crapper, got no trouble with Bloomberg busting into my - er - cube.

  107. IP traffic accounting with iptables by CustomDesigned · · Score: 1

    I don't have a separate interface for cable router at home. I identify incoming cable traffic by MAC address of the router (regardless of source ip), and outgoing cable traffic by dest ip. Those two rules have packet and byte counts that are exactly what I need - except that they get reset whenever I tweak the firewall. There is a way to preserve the counts for just those two rules (or everything except the rules I changed), but it is not trivial. If there was an simple way to save the counts for a specific chain/table - that would be easy to work in to the firewall.

    1. Re:IP traffic accounting with iptables by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MRTG and/or RRDs

  108. Just for comparison.... by g1zmo · · Score: 1

    Where I live in the Dallas-Fort Worth area the rental rates are similar. I pay $765/month for a *very* modest 3 bedroom and it's an absolute steal, but minimum wage in Texas is only $5.15. Unfortunately that's what I'm making right now until I can find a real job, so I'm quite familiar with the frugal life.

    --
    I have found there are just two ways to go.
    It all comes down to livin' fast or dyin' slow.
    -REK, Jr.
  109. Solitare At Work......Luxury! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At my job the IT guy had to remove ALL Windows games before he gave out our "new" computers. The games would slow productivity was the thinking. Its bad enough that he could only gives us guest priv for the computers we worked on everyday to "prevent someone from doing something bad to the computer". Oh yeah we also only have dial up at an amazing speed of 28.8 on a good day. Its not our IT guys fault he does what he can to keep his job.(Yes only1 person in our IT) I usually have to deal with large files inline so I just go home early (cable) and down load. So I guess its not to bad....

  110. What made you mention Paducah? by ModernGeek · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    *Waves from his Paducah house*

    --
    Sig: I stole this sig.
    1. Re:What made you mention Paducah? by dickens · · Score: 1

      Mention *my* name in Sheboygan!

    2. Re:What made you mention Paducah? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was wondering the same thing, having lived next to Paducha for half my life.

  111. The term of the day is "At Will" by Evil+W1zard · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Policy or not its an At Will state just like most of the rest of the country and since the firing isn't because of any protected reason (race, sex, age, etc) then he's out of luck. Shit they could have fired him because they thought he talked too much or they didnt like the way he was looking at them. Right or wrong doesnt really matter when at-will rules the workforce today. Doesnt matter if there was a computer use policy or not. Sucks but its the law of the land for 49 states...

    And good luck trying to prove wrongful termination in court without blatent supporting evidence.

    --
    News Reporters Make Tasty Polar Bear Treats!
    1. Re:The term of the day is "At Will" by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

      Sucks but its the law of the land for 49 states...

      It's my understanding that it's easier to fire someone in the state that's not at-will (I think it's Wyoming.) The reason for that is because the other 49 states have massive amounts of common law judicial restrictions that have eaten away at the at-will concept, which Wyoming eliminated when they codified their employment agreement structure.

    2. Re:The term of the day is "At Will" by Tom_Yardley · · Score: 1

      If my employment is "at will," I can leave any time I want. What is the opposite?

    3. Re:The term of the day is "At Will" by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

      What is the opposite?

      Not being able to leave anytime you want. ;-)

      In all seriousness, I see what you're trying to do, but the law "don't work that way." (Though it probably came a lot closer 100 years ago than it does today.)

      A law professor friend of mine is convinced that most states will eliminate the at-will concept in the next few decades because they will have been eaten away at so much that it would require a lawyer to know who can be fired and when.

  112. Time to make a solatair Killer by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    Ill make a program that will find the process of solatair and kill it, there by
    preventing any of those games running. I will then sell it to the CEOs of Fortune 100 companies
    for $40/workstation/year licence.

    OT: How many times do CEOs waste doing nothing, playing golf, having 3hr lunches. They are the real
    wasters, getting $1000/hr but not showing anything for it.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    1. Re:Time to make a solatair Killer by cammoblammo · · Score: 1

      This script should do it:

      del sol.exe

      I don't remember much DOS scripting, but I'm sure I could patch it to make it search recursively.

      --

      Cogito, ergo sig.

  113. How the hell... by sabedoria · · Score: 2, Interesting

    did this employee survive in NYC with 27K a year??!!

  114. Dear Mayor of NYC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear Mayor Bloomberg,

    I play Sim City 2000 all day and I think its bad what you done.

    Sincerely,

    George W

    1. Re:Dear Mayor of NYC by kaligraphic · · Score: 1

      Well, no wonder the country is in its current state - Sim City 3000 is so much better!

      --
      You are standing in an open server west of a blue house, with a boarded front door. There is an Exchange mailbox here.
  115. I smell B.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh please....

    "...programmer....She"

    Whatever!

  116. Probably? by paullyjunge · · Score: 1
    For instance, reading ponography at work is probably also frowned upon,

    Man, where can I get some of that ponography? Pornography at the workplace is becoming a bore.
  117. Sounds like they need ... by AdamReyher · · Score: 1

    ... Terry Tate 'Office Linebacker'.

    "When it's game time ... it's pain time, baby! WHOOOO!"

    --
    The Computations of AdamR
    http://www.adamreyher.com
  118. The silver bullet by grolschie · · Score: 1

    ...anyone got any incriminating photographs of said major in compromising positions? :-)

  119. should have tried nethack by valdean · · Score: 2, Informative
    Nethack is the best game to play at work... no one has a clue what you're doing. Bloomberg wouldn't have even blinked.

    Solitaire is always going to get you in trouble because it's so recognizable.

  120. Re:Terms of use - removal of games, surfing porn by COredneck · · Score: 1

    In my job, I work at an Air Force facility. Besides doing my Unix stuff, I and my cohort also deal with Windows PC's for training classes. Besides loading the standard S/W on the machines such as MS Office, we also go through and remove any and all games. No hearts, no solitare, no freecell, no ... you get the picture. There is also a strict Internet policy as well but they aim their enforcement towards porno which I can understand. Our company recently sent an e-mail out talking about appropriate use of Internet resources. Word got around that someone was surfing not only porn but child porn !

    This is the crap that not only gets you canned but also arrested and eventually have to register as a sex offender along with loss of rights. The trend these days is cracking down on sex offenders such as banning them from living within a certain number of feet from schools, parks, trails, swimming pools or other areas where children congregate at. In fact some places, sex offenders are forced to move when new laws are passed. Also, even if you live far from places like parks, you are not allowed to use them or get near.

  121. if you don't have solitaire... by CompMD · · Score: 1

    ...make it! Thats what one of my friends who recently worked for Cessna did. He was a flight test engineer and would have stretches of time when he would have nothing to do. Textron (Cessna's parent company) had their IT people remove games from workstations. However, his computer did have VB installed on it, so he made Minesweeper. When he finished that, he made Solitaire. When he finished that, he quit and came to work with me instead.

  122. He'll Probably Be Reinstated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    City employees are protected from asshole higher-ups by civil service laws. If the employee requests, a hearing is held before an independent arbiter, who can reinstate the employee. Unless the City's lawyers can justify the firing (and this appears unlikely - everyone's played solitaire at work and the employee was not obviously delinquent in his duties) the employee will be reinstated with back pay.

    But Bloomberg will benefit politically from his hardass behavior: the taxpayers will approve of his tough stance on those lazy City employees.

  123. Very sad. by JVert · · Score: 1

    Yup, pitiful they hated you so much that they canned your ass for playing solitare at work. Obviously an irreplacable asset to the company...

  124. Annoying or Productive? by mfh · · Score: 1

    Studies show that people who socialize are more productive -- even if it's through taking frequent smoke breaks. Why? Because their morale is much higher after they have had a social break, so their quality of work is higher when they return. Non-smokers often spiral into gloom and doom when sales are down, while smokers are optimistic -- they smoke even though they know it will kill them! We're all going to die anyway, might as well die happy -- right? ;-)

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Annoying or Productive? by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      I agree with what you say about people who socialize being more productive, but I think with the pack-of-smokers example (hah, no pun intended) it gets counterbalanced--

      Thing about smokers is that their productivity plummets when the nicotine craving hits. In job situations where it's not possible for the smoker to just mosey on outside whenever (ie, daily deadlines need to be met, which require the smoker to finish a number of tasks before taking a cig break is an option) it's easy to watch someone's focus go downhill from the first time they say "man I need a cigarette" Their productivity might be higher right after coming back from the break, but it'll go to hell pretty quick when the nicotine wears off (of course depending on the level of addiction)

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  125. LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Get the fuck out then bitch.

    Your kind have been moaning for the past 6 years about this 'exodus to Canada'.

    WELL FUCKING DO IT. WE HONESTLY AREN'T STOPPING YOU AND WOULD BE PLEASED IF YOU LEFT!!!

    P.S.: Alot of that stuff you listed as your grievances are currently taking place in Canada as well, so... Cuba for you I guess?

  126. Working is not a right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Blow that attitude.

    Who the devil thought up that idea? When it becomes somehow politically correct to question a person's right to work, that's on par with attacking a person's right to speak his mind, maybe even worse.

    I'm not asserting that everyone has a right to a plush job where they don't have to do any work. I'm not even asserting that anyone has a right to a specific job. But questioning a person's right to work when management can't find a reason to fire him other than clashes of opinion? That's the attitude of a slave. Shoot, clashes of opinion are often a company's most valuable resource.

    People who are prevented from working lose a part of their humanity. Creating an artificial shortage of material resources is cruel enough, but an artificial shortage of work, that is just plain the worst sort of greed there is.

  127. Moron. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, what a dick. Pay people 27k a year, forbid any sort of 'non work' activity with an opressive work atmosphere, and employee morale will be super high! They will all be be super psyched to keep their skills up and do the best job they can every day!

    NOT. They'll stare blankly at an excel spreadsheet and bail out of there at 5'oclock sharp.

  128. Uninstall?? by queenb**ch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If there is software he's not supposed to be using while he's at work, why is it even installed? It is quite simple to supress the installation of all of the "Games". How's this for logic, Mr Smarty Pants Mayor...If you don't want your employees playing games, DON'T INSTALL THEM....DUH!!!! I really don't see why an employee should be fired for using software that you provided him with, even if it is a game.

    2 cents,

    Queen B

    --
    HDGary secures my bank :/
    1. Re:Uninstall?? by danheretic · · Score: 1

      Not installing them doesn't always help. In a former job I was a sysadmin assigned the task of removing all games from the company's PCs. It seems a certain department had an addiction to Solitaire. I did that, but they were just savvy enough to copy sol.exe from their home computer to the PC's c:\temp (which was required to stay open access).

      Kids (and game-playing employees) will find a way, y'know.

    2. Re:Uninstall?? by clarkc3 · · Score: 1

      thats why you create a GPO that doesn't allow it to run based on the hash value of the program. In a training class I took they said that was one of the most asked things to be shown, so they figured they would add a presentation on how to do it. Doesn't matter where you store it or even if you rename it, it doesn't work when you define the group policy that way

  129. Re: Get Real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The mayor is a billionaire. That entitles him to shoot to kill if he wants to. This guy is lucky that the mayor forgot his handgun.

    Now get back to work!

  130. Now, THIS is a Solitaire addiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mr. Mayor doesn't know employee diligence when he sees it. Or the other thing.

    I worked at a multinational tech company in the late eighties that had money to burn. Our supervisor was a very nice guy who liked fixing computers, but was forced into supervising a group (ours) where everyone was competent and no one needed supervision.

    So, he played Solitaire.

    He was the sort of guy who never gave up on a game. If he started to lose, or got stuck, he would keep pressing Undo (on the Mac version), and try something different, again and again.

    One day, I stopped by to ask a question and he had the "Player Stats" window open. It indicated that he had won more than 2,200 games.

    Now, THAT is excessive Solitaire, Mr. Mayor. So tell that poor guy he can come back.

  131. "Boss Button" should be required for every game by capedgirardeau · · Score: 1



    What happened to the good old "boss button" that would throw up a screen shot of a spread sheet or code at the touch of a button?

    That should be manditory in all games.

    Actually it should be a feature of the OS *hint* *hint*

    --
    Wax on, wax off baby!
    1. Re:"Boss Button" should be required for every game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      alt + tab

    2. Re:"Boss Button" should be required for every game by Krakhan · · Score: 1

      In Windows XP at least, you could windows+d. Works just as well.

    3. Re:"Boss Button" should be required for every game by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      How does that differ from windows+m?

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  132. Don't muzzle the ox by Joseph_Daniel_Zukige · · Score: 1

    if you want the ox to do any useful work.

    I was all gung-ho for a company that was looking for programmers willing to telecommute. But when I told the vp I was ready to go to work, he asked me why I didn't say I _wanted_ to work for them. In the process of the discussions while I was trying to figure out if I could communicate well enough with them to bet a few years on his company, he said he wasn't intending to pay me to think.

    You can bet I backed out of that one fast. I'm sure he didn't mean it that way, but it's no good trying to work for someone when you can't agree on how to even talk about things like this.

    It's the same thing. Solitaire? Water cooler? Sitting back and staring at the ceiling for more than a few seconds? Failing to put the right cue words in a work report?

    The employer needs to understand the meaning behind the words and the deeds.

  133. A classic "not working" story - Jon Bentley? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi -

    On this subject, here is a classic story about the attitude some managers have, I think it was from one of Jon Bentley's "Programming Pearls" type books....

    A programmer who was working on a very complex system involving something like telephone switching optimization was leaning back in his chair staring off into space. A manager happened to walk by and asked him what he was doing. The programmer replied "Thinking" To which the manager said "Don't you think you could do that at home?"

    TWR

  134. enjoying work by Joseph_Daniel_Zukige · · Score: 1

    If you don't enjoy your job at least part of the workday, you're either working a job that needs not to be done or working a job you're not fit to do.

    On the other hand, if your job is nothing but fun and games all day long and never hard, you can say the same thing.

    Somewhere in between those two extremes is the work that keeps the world running, and where in the spectrum any particular job falls on a particular job is a bit random.

    Fun is a red herring in this discussion.

  135. sexual harassment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, now that I take a look at nakednews.com, you're right. Some people might think that's better than a cup of coffee for getting them going in the morning, but some people would probably rather not get that kind of going in the morning. Different stimulants for different people.

    (I don't know if I'd get any work done, but I'm pretty sure I don't want to find out. My wife is plenty stimulating for me.)

  136. Is it really discrimination though? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do they need to keep the guy on if everyone hates him?

  137. Hearts is better by Plocmstart · · Score: 1

    I spent one summer (during the .com bust) working as a credit card bill collector. I sat in a little cubicle and called people all day that had past-due accounts on their Victoria's Secret or whatever other clothing store credit cards the company handled. Well my computer was one of the few that still had Hearts on it, and after I got pretty good at memorizing the scripts we were supposed to go through and making the best use of the desktop space in Windows I managed to keep all my work up, continue doing my job at the same pace, and also play Hearts on the side. I'd play the most while on hold waiting for someone at a hospital or car dealership that was supposedly going to show up on the phone, and when I needed to do actual data entry I'd of course stop playing Hearts immedately and do my job. But it was mostly talking with nothing else to do. So one day my supervisor came by and saw what I was doing and I was just about fired, but luckily I guess I was also bringing in the biggest dollar amounts for them too so I was just told to not play games any more. So I went on to other tasks, like finding a bunch of security holes in their old Windows95 PC network which I told them about and they ignored. Then I sketched every object on my desk, and finally started bringing in magazines to read. I also got in trouble for those. I could read things, but only company-approved magazines or training manuals. So IEEE Spectrum didn't cut it. Anyways I was glad to be done with that job when it was time to start school again. I guess some jobs just arn't meant to be long term, and I don't know who would want to keep a job that strict anyways.

  138. Many people are at risk... by davevr · · Score: 1

    According to our data, the built-in games (freecell, solitaire, etc.) are the second-most common frontmost window on people's machines. The most common is the web browser, and I'm sure all that isn't all work-related either. Productity applications are way down the list... I think 48% of knowledge workers would be out of job if they enforced the "no computer play" policy... :-)

  139. In Soviet Russia.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the employee fires you!

  140. I got reamed for Freecell by MsWillow · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Every morning, while my cow-orkers and bosses wasted half an hour getting coffee and talking about TV, I spent 10-15 minutes doing a serious mental workout playing Freecell. It helped me concentrate, and enabled me to better see the consequences of my actions, something very important when fixing bugs or adding features to legacy code. However, my boss's boss only saw that I was playing a game (one that he never could win, to my 25+ game streak), and forced me to stop. So my code quality dropped, but that was irrelevant. What mattered more was that I was seen to be working harder.

    The company got bought out. He kept his job; I ended up homeless.

    --

    Lemon curry?
    1. Re:I got reamed for Freecell by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Ah the american dream lives on! [even if you're not in the states]

      The trick really at this point is

      Small company: Huge risk, make sure you can street perform something people will pay for.

      Midsized: Become barmates with the lads and fit in well.

      Large [...where I work...]: Extract all you can, there may not be a tommorow. That or learn to stab people in the back so when cuts roll around you look like a greased wheel.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  141. What the ... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Ridicule? In other words, the FTC is planning on embarrassing spyware vendors and their customers? Yeah ... right. How about we forget "ridicule" and move on to "RICO". Now that might slow them down a little. At least, it might make U.S. vendors think twice about employing a spyware outfit. Won't do much good anywhere else though.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  142. evil by armanoid57 · · Score: 1

    solitaire.exe is evil coded from evil by an evil company encouraging evil

    --
    fopen("/dev/null", O_TRUNC) and write ("hole")
    1. Re:evil by jofi · · Score: 1
      It's sol.exe

      Nice try though

      --
      Blame the user, not the software.
    2. Re:evil by armanoid57 · · Score: 1

      Noooooooo
      http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/4464/vaderphoto booth5jl.jpg

      I will wait until someone will be fired because of mines.exe

      --
      fopen("/dev/null", O_TRUNC) and write ("hole")
  143. Let me get this straight... by ignavus · · Score: 1

    So this mayor is *not* hard at work at his desk, but wandering around getting useless publicity shots of himself - as if that is really advancing the city - and he has the nerve to call the menial employee a time waster!

    Pot sacks kettle for being soot-covered.

    --
    I am anarch of all I survey.
  144. Its about time by omry_y · · Score: 1

    About time someone gets fired for playing that stupid game.

    --
    Omry.
  145. Ridiculous by omeg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Totally ridiculous. When you're at work, you can only focus on your daily duties for so long.

    Even the most concentrated employees have to look up Slashdot or their favorite news site at some point for some well-earned distraction. And why? Because it makes you work better afterwards!

    I do this often and I'll thankfully never be fired for it, given the size and type of the company that I work at (graphic design and web development studio), but I don't think that company size has any correlation to the usefulness of a little bit of distraction every now and then.

  146. Smoke breaks always pissed me off by aztektum · · Score: 1

    This is slightly off topic, if this guys computer policy said "Thou shalt no play solitaire at work." then Oops for him. But this partly made me think of how things always seem to work at companies I have worked for

    Smokers usually take 3-4 or more breaks a day for a cigarette and no one ever complained. I never understood how when I would take a quick break to check personal e-mail, this was any different than some stinky bastard standing out in the snow or rain, spending at least 30 minutes a day total smoking. When did they earn special privilege for essentially slacking off?

    The best part is is that this story is about a government employee being canned for playing a game at work. Two things come to mind: If you don't want them playing it don't give them access and 2) Like even the mayor himself hasn't screwed up on the job, probably with greater impact. It's funny how grunts in government jobs tend to be made examples of when their bosses may very well be even bigger screw ups.

    --
    :: aztek ::
    No sig for you!!
    1. Re:Smoke breaks always pissed me off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Smokers usually take 3-4 or more breaks a day for a cigarette and no one ever complained... When did they earn special privilege for essentially slacking off?

      They earned that privilege at the same time nonsmoking assholes got most offices to be non-smoking. Next time you have a problem with it, tell your manage you want your cube/office to be the new smoking room, so smokers don't have to "slack off" outside. Until then, shut the hell up.

  147. Playing games is Unprofessional by ramsj900 · · Score: 1

    Would it be OK if the guy had a real deck of cards and was playing solitare at his desk? I don't think so. So what's the difference. Besides, what kind of employee can't think of anything less obvious to will wasting the companies money?

    --
    Relax, aren't you lucky that it is only my Opinion?
  148. I'd feel sorry for the guy, except... by RexRhino · · Score: 1

    I would feel sorry for the guy, except this was a government office. You know that if it was a speeding ticket, or getting a permit to repair a driveway, or any number of other things, no pencil pushing beurocrat would "let it slide" for anything. If only more city government employees got screwed by the major, they would know how we feel!

  149. Cut off health insurance for motorcycles too by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    Right here. Not my country, but if they were taking a big chunk out of my pay check towards some HMO, I'd make sure that they did what I was paying them for.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  150. Leave the games installed and use auditing by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 1

    Audit all events related to solitaire or any other games. The user will have no idea.

  151. Grammar police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > On the other hand it appears this guy new the mayor was coming

    You mean KNEW - not NEW.
    I hope this doesn't become acceptable.
    I'd fire somebody for this mistake.

  152. Heh by Krakhan · · Score: 1

    "The firings will continue until employee morale improves."

  153. JIHAD! Jihad against the evil bosses! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let us kill these bosses! And let us burn down their offices!

    Come, brothers! Let us bomb innocent people because of this offense!

  154. Mayor was right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    First off, the Mayor was right - not so much because the guy was playing solitare on company time, but because the guy was STUPID enough to leave the game up while the Mayor was in the office!

    It's freekin' Bloomberg dude! Not only is he the Mayor, but he's a billionaire. And you can bet your ass that he didn't get there by playing fucken solitare on the PC. He got there thru hard work, on his part, and that of others (probably mostly others), and by keeping costs low.

    Now someone playing around when they're being paid to work isn't working hard, and isn't keeping costs low. It's fucking around and costing the taxpayers money.

    Since the Mayor is *SUPPOSED* to be the guy who has a fiduciary responsibility to the tax payers - he did the right thing in my book and shitcanned the guy.... Good riddance I say - and maybe the rest of the morons in the room will think twice before playing around...

    Is this good for morale? Probably not, but hey - it sure as hell gets the point across... Lord knows that I've had some schmucks working for me who I know play solitare when they're supposed to be working and flat out lie when confronted with the evidence of usage... We have an agreement that the employees sign stating "NO GAMES", and they still do it... We tried fooling around with the warnings... didn't have any effect. What did have an effect was firing one violator... interestingly enough, after that - no more violators..... oh yeah, Bloomberg was spot on...

  155. Simple Cure by hoover · · Score: 1

    Play a game of console-version nethack... everyone will think you're busy hacking away on the mainframe! During my days at university, I actually overheard a conversation between a student and a not-very-computer-literate prof where the student claimed to be working on some group theory related program - whilst playing nethack!

    --
    Ever wondered whats wrong with the world? http://www.ishmael.org/
  156. Mayors are public servants by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

    Actually, no. Mayors are public servants, not rulers. Thinking of them as something very special isn't really done here at all; that might be a patriotism-related thing in the US. Here in Northern Ireland, they're basically just folks who look good cutting ribbons. And even that's debatable, with their big gold necklaces and stuff ;)

  157. this guy is mayor? by kin242 · · Score: 1

    Regardless of whether he was legally allowed to do such a thing, ethically this is not the way for a mayor to behave. Such behaviour merits at the worst a mild warning. I am truly appalled that you have a bully like this as mayor.

    --
    kin242.net
  158. I play Klondike... by Shag · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...on my Treo, while using the bathroom. At work. No one's complained so far.

    Of course, if I get my work done for the day, then it's Warcraft time...

    No, not on the Treo.

    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
  159. 27k in NYC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Might as well collect change on the street, you might do better. The mayor could have done this guy a favor, although it's not this guy's fault that sol is installed on the computer, probably a microsoft windows specialty, they spend so much programming resources on sol that it never bluescreens, unlike business critical applications :)

    Sorry it's 5am, I've had no coffee, and I'm very bitter from dealing with a solomon M$ problem over the course of the last 2 days, CRAP.

    -j

  160. That's Nothing.... by Madpony · · Score: 1

    One time I played through all of Final Fantasy on an NES emulator at work while I installed a boring and tedious PeopleSoft service pack that took about two weeks or so to get fully installed.

  161. New definition of tightarse by POds · · Score: 1

    What a tool of a boss. wait no... tool of a human! Seriously, why kinda of person does this? In my previous job, as trainee software engineer, it was recommended regular breaks where neccessary for eye sight reasons and others. I think the guy who got fired is lucky... if his boss is this tight, he's probably been holding out on a lot more than just break time!

    --


    Giving IE users a taste of their own medicine since 2005 - http://pods.-is-a-geek.net/
  162. It's fun to kick around the little guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another shinning example of compassionate conservatism in action. 100 bucks says it would be a different story if it was the DA or Chief of Police?

  163. Wouln't happen in the UK by NoMercy · · Score: 1

    Thankfully here, we have laws against fireing people for stupid reasons, firt you'd need to have one or two written or a few verbal warnings before hand, and then you could take the company to court claming unfair dismissal, where the company would probably have to show you were playing solitare out of lunch hours, and that they don't provide IT equipment during lunch hours for personal use (see proxy log of managers all viewing dilbert during lunch).

    1. Re:Wouln't happen in the UK by arethuza · · Score: 1

      Those rules only apply after, I think, a year (or possibly two). Before then you can be sacked for pretty much no reason.

  164. I'm with you. by aug24 · · Score: 1

    I'm a contactor. I work about 50 minutes out of every hour, and goof off the rest, unless I'm 'in the zone', when I have no idea ;-)

    If I didn't, I'd soon not be able to work at all.

    This guy should get another job with a sane boss... and all his co-workers better get their heads up from this and start looking too.

    Justin.

    --
    You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
  165. kinda like chatting by Danzigism · · Score: 1

    its definitely like chatting while at work.. hell, if it wasn't for #Linux and #Linuxhelp, I'd have no job to begin with..

    --
    *plays the Apogee theme song music*
  166. Why get caught? by Hosiah · · Score: 1

    Ever heard of the "Boss key", which was around even in the days of DOS games? You mean to tell me you're so inept that you can't hide a solitaire window on your screen? You don't have a good enough sense of radar to know when somebody's coming? You let your screen be visible from the door of your cubicle?

  167. evolved culture, identity politics, immigration by Cryofan · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Yes, the question is why do so many americans fail to act in their own best interests?
    Why do our domesticated cattle walk into our slaughterhouses, whereas their wild cousins will run from us?

    Two major factors:
    1. Our American culture is an evolved organism, evolved by elite propaganda to serve the elite.
      This deals with the idea that a major part of what is inside the human brain is learned after birth. A large part of this learning is culture. Culture is therefore a large part of each human.

    Culture is a set of ideas about what the world is supposed to be and how we are supposed to behave, among other things.

    Culture is not necessarily a product of random chance. In fact, culture is like an animal in an ecosystem. Over generations, that species is shaped by environmental forces. Jsut as domesticated animals are evolved by humans over generations.

    Hypothesis: American culture is a species of domesticated culture shaped and evolved by elite forces. Elite forces are force vectors in the form of ideas that are inserted into our culture by those entities and persons who are rich and powerful. The elite might be politicians, large corporations, political lobbies and interest groups, rich people, think tanks, large nonprofit foudnations, and mass media figures.

    These elite shape our culture over decades to make it suit them. They are capital. We are labor. Our interests are for the most part, directly opposed.

    So our culture has been domesticated by them to suit them, to be friendly to them.

    The wolf would bite you or me. But your pet dog Rover will not.

      This domestication of the american culture has mainly been effected though tv and radio.

    And you see on this thread that Americans are on the side of the elite now. They are OWNED by the elite, ideologically.

    Also, two other factors that help the elite control AMericans, mostly white Americans, is White Hating Identity Politics (WHIP) and Mass Immigration of Third Worlders (MIOTW).

    The political left in america is controlled by the elite. It has been domesticated by them. It has been used by the elite to drive the largest bloc in America (the white lower middle class in general) away from leftism. They did this by foundation grant to liberal activists and writers etc that focus on identity politics, especially of a type that sees white people as irredeemably racist, and sees racism as something that is only associated with whites. Thus, whites, esp. lower middle class whites, are, by the tenets of WHIP, evil.

    WHIP antagonizes whites against the Left, and drives them into the arms of the Right, which is the main tool of the elite.

    Also, the Left in Ameica (actually the FAUXleft) has operated in conjunction with the Right to bring in large numbers of immigrants from third world nations with who look very different from white Americans. This is causing rapid change in America.

    Rapid change causes people to react.
      White Americans feel as if they are under siege. THey are circling the wagons. And thus they are more vulnerable to seduction by elite ideology.

    That is why America has moved to the right.

    I am making a documentary on this general subject.
    See my sig for more....

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
    1. Re:evolved culture, identity politics, immigration by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1
      Our American culture is an evolved organism
      A lot of people there don't believe that.
      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    2. Re:evolved culture, identity politics, immigration by heinousjay · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Believing in a rigid class structure is simply an incorrect mindset that feeds itself the poison you've spewed in your comment. It would certainly help to achieve your aims, because a leftist society requires a rigid class structure to keep the workers in line, but what you're talking about is wishful thinking, not a valid observation.

      These elite shape our culture over decades to make it suit them. They are capital. We are labor. Our interests are for the most part, directly opposed.

      This is only in a society where there is enforced stratification, which isn't the case at all. Anyone, with proper application of willpower, can bring themselves into the level of the so-called elite. No one has a magic barrier preventing this. Only people who refuse to raise themselves up are stuck.

      And anyway, if you thinks American culture is driven by a so-called elite you obviously haven't noticed any popular entertainment over the last fifteen years.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    3. Re:evolved culture, identity politics, immigration by hraefn · · Score: 1

      Proper application of willpower.

      And some luck.

  168. Edward Greenwood IX by tverbeek · · Score: 1

    I say give the guy his job back... but only if he assures us that his toddler isn't named "Edward". Giving a child a hand-me-down name as heavily used as that should be grounds for termination. Break the cycle!

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  169. He's Lying by thelizman · · Score: 1

    But perhaps not about his playing patterns. He's lying because he was fired along with a dozen other people who weren't playing solitaire as part of a restructuring of the department. And chances are good he and the rest of those employees were among the least productive, lest they would have been retasked within the department.

  170. Heheeh reminds me of my coworker.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He spends his days shopping for a car. It's been a month and he's still shopping for a car. I have no clue as to why it takes him so long to find a car but apparently he's been doing this even before I started working.

  171. Italian cars by k2r · · Score: 1

    > I'm italian and we have the exact same problem here with
    > FIAT, rescaled appropriately.

    At least Italian cars are perceived as beautiful even if broken.
    American cars tend to be more like WMD.

    Well, I'm German, we have the idiotic Volkswagen "Phaeton" now which is exactly not what the name "Volkswagen" says but what the Volkswagen-Management wanted to drive themselves.

    The French built quite good, technically advanced cars.

    k2r

  172. Violate guidelines; would you do one quake frag? by PhYrE2k2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Oh come on.

    Plain and simple, what you do at work must be within the guidelines of your employer and its computer usage policy.

    You wouldn't bring up quake, even for just a single frag, so why do people think it's suddenly okay to pull up solitaire, hearts, or the latest java/flash game from third party Web sites? The employer couldn't care less that you wanted only a single frag, playing games is probably against their computer policy, and this person is a clear violator of it. You wouldn't pull out a deck of cards either and start playing a game on your desk, though that'd be more of a company policy than a computer and company policy.

    So this is simply that someone didn't follow the rules and is now whining. Some employers are a bit more lax during lunch hours, and that's okay, but you should never just assume that the employer will be okay with you checking personal mail, surfing the net, or playing games during lunch.

    I'm sure what happened in more detail is a boss walked by a few times in a week at varying times (11, 2p, 3p, etc) and saw half the time that this person was playing games instead of working. The employer has every right to kick them out. They're on someone elses dollar, so they damn-well be worth it

    --

    when you see the word 'Linux', drink!
  173. Perception more important -seen this by MonsterMasher · · Score: 2, Interesting

    After years of overwork I was finially given an assistant to train who would help me at my engineering support position in a small company. He spent no more then 15 minutes a day eating a brown bag lunch and playing the ASCII version of startrek.

    Unfortuentally, his desktop could be seen from the hallway and it happened the owner saw this game being played a number of times. He was reassigned away because "he did nothing but play computer games."

    A short time later after getting an amazingly bad performace review I left the company and they hire 3 people (kid you not) to do my jobs (and kept me as a part time consultant for 6 months).

  174. Drag and Drop. by rapidweather · · Score: 1

    I do not know for sure, but Solitare may have been included in Windows as a way of showing the users how "drag and drop" works. Too bad that game has gotten out of hand. I went into an office yesterday, and the guy in charge was on a Windows XP machine, playing (you guessed it) Solitare. Too bad there are so few little games like that included in Windows.
    Sometimes I want to just give them a cd of my Knoppix remaster, so they can have a wider variety of games to play. You can bet these people are not connected to the internet, or they would be doing that, and not playing Solitare. I have some pages on Geocities, and they provide a little OS sniffer, so I can see what OS's visit the page. A lot of "Windows NT" seen there. I can imagine that may be surfing at work, and perhaps enjoying the broadband too.

  175. Games come installed - They made me do it! by Mesinjah · · Score: 1

    If you don't want your peeps playing games then DONT INSTALL GAMES on your systems. This guy should sue them as he was obviously just using software that his employer pre-installed on his workstation.

  176. Read a book, loser. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Fired" != "laid off," which is what you're implying happened. If he was, indeed, fired, it was for doing (or not doing) *something* -- otherwise, wage & labor becomes very interested. (Note that this doesn't necessarilly apply to "at will" states, though, if you "let go" someone in an "at will" state, it still needs to be done for a legal reason; eg., firing someone for not sleeping with you *will* get you in trouble, regardless of state.)

    And, for the record, "lest" means (pretty much) "for fear that..." not "else."

    [Note: sorry for the personal attack, but you felt no particular reluctance to indulge, so I've been willing to point out what an idiot you are. Hope you now feel enlightened. Not, mind you, that I'm sure that's possible. Good day.]

    1. Re:Read a book, loser. by thelizman · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      which is what you're implying happened.

      I directly stated it you moron. If you don't know about the issue, then keep your ignorant hole shut.

  177. A nice fat settlement by cprice · · Score: 1


    The 27K a year is nothing compared to the wrongful dismissal suit the City of New York will likely have to settle. The court might just give the guy his job back and award damages plus costs.

  178. WoW by Aphoric · · Score: 1

    We had a developer who played WoW all day and then charged overtime to do the work he was supposed to be doing durring the day... and he did not get fired. If that's not wrong, I don't know what is.

    --
    People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
  179. Sorry no time for photo u hypocrit mayor, I'm busy by backslashdot · · Score: 1

    Next time, when the mayor comes by DURING OFFICE HOURS for a photo opportunity, the right thing to do is say ..

    "Sorry mayor I am busy, I dont have time to pose in your photo that you'll use for political gain, after all I heard you fire people for having solitaire open without even evidence of them suing the computer during office hours."

  180. This must be how the $400,000,000 house.... by Jaime2 · · Score: 1

    happened. An employee at the assessor's office used to smoke and get regular breaks. Then he quit and started playing solitaire for 30 minutes a day. The boss saw him and made him stop. Said employee became miserable and stressed and made an $8M mistake.

    If you don't know what I'm talking about see here: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/02/11/141420 1

  181. Whos comptuer? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    If it is owned by the office, you dont have a right to do ANTHING that isnt approved.

    Sure we all do it, but they also have the right to can you for it. Its the risk you take.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  182. Read Slashdot instead of solitaire by neonprimetime · · Score: 1

    I personally find reading Slashdot more intriguing than playing solitaire ... and when you're reading Slashdot at work it looks more like you're "researching" online ... where as when you're playing solitaire it simply looks like you're not working.

    My personal recommendation so that you don't get fired ... just stick to reading Slashdot.

  183. Solitaire by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2, Funny

    One fine day, after installing Microsoft SMS 2.0, I wanted to try out the 'server licensing' feature; install software on each computer, tell SMS how many licenses you actually have, and it lets only that many copies run at a time, queues people up, and so on.

    I decide to test it on Solitare; so I tell the thing that only one copy of sol.exe is allowed to run, fire a copy up on my desktop, try firing it up on my laptop, and sure enough, the laptop gets a message.

    A few minutes later, over comes one of the Vice Presidents, asking me to kindly turn Solitare back on.

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  184. Send an message to Mayor Michael Bloomberg! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Loose a job is not funny. Lets send a message to this solitaire mayor!

  185. NYC will loose this one by ebrandsberg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A few months ago I passed a NYC police car at night, and when I glanced in, I saw two police officers playing solitair. The next night, I passed ANOTHER police car with two cops doing the same thing. I went online, and searched for a bit, and found that yes, they WERE allowed to play it by policy during lunch and breaks. This implies it was probably general policy for the city, and as such, simply observing it on someone's desk is not grounds for termination.

  186. TURTLES ALL THE WAY DOWN by Cryofan · · Score: 0, Flamebait



    Believing in a rigid class structure is simply an incorrect mindset that feeds itself the poison you've spewed in your comment.


    The poison I've spewed into my comment?

    Your poor command of the language and rhetorical logic betrays the relative feebleness of your mind right from the git-go.

    Watch out, folks! I'm gonna have to spill this kid's blood. Keep an eye out for splatter...



    It would certainly help to achieve your aims, because a leftist society requires a rigid class structure to keep the workers in line, but what you're talking about is wishful thinking, not a valid observation.


    Research bears me out. A hierarchy BY DEFINITION means that only a relative few make it to the upper levels. NO MATTER WHAT CRITERIA YOU ESTABLISH FOR SUCH LEVEL MOBILITY, you ALWAYS come back to that fundamental fact-->a hierarchy BY DEFINITION MEANS THAT ONLY A RELATIVE FEW ARE AT THE TOP.

    ALWAYS.



    This is only in a society where there is enforced stratification, which isn't the case at all. Anyone, with proper application of willpower, can bring themselves into the level of the so-called elite. No one has a magic barrier preventing this. Only people who refuse to raise themselves up are stuck.


    Just because you could do that does not mean that everyone can. Once again, you resort to "turtles all the way down" logic.

    BY DEFINITION ONLY A RELATIVE FEW CAN MAKE IT TO THE TOP OF ANY HIERARCHY.

    that is the IMMUTABLE, TIMELESS, definition of hierarchy.


    And anyway, if you thinks American culture is driven by a so-called elite you obviously haven't noticed any popular entertainment over the last fifteen years.



    Popular entertainment is a product of HUGE AMOUNTS of money. You think the elite DO NOT control that amonnt of money.

    The system works like natural selection evolution in an ecosystem. The elite control mass media and popular entertainment production. All ideas pass through their filter. Just as in the ecosytem, the animal species are molded and evolved by the environmental forces of that ecosytem, which shapes them (e.g., the giraffe evolves a long neck due to environmental forces upon it), so too does the american culture evolve to suit the elite, because the elite control the ideology that becomes part of the culture.

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
    1. Re:TURTLES ALL THE WAY DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Anatomy of a Comment:

      First, ad hominem argument (attack the person)...
      Second, ad baculum argument (threat -- blood splatter)...
      Third, semantics (battle of definitions)...
      Fourth, argument by extremes ALWAYS/NEVER/TIMELESS/IMMUTABLE... (your caps)

      Fifth and final, argumentum ad lazarum... look it up...

      Whose strong rhetorical logic? Whose feeble mind?

    2. Re:TURTLES ALL THE WAY DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent +1 knows the difference between whose and who's.

  187. He deserved being fired. by BarnabyWilde · · Score: 1

    He deserved being fired.

  188. Xfie? by Obi-w00t · · Score: 1

    He could have been trying to get Solitaire to the top of the "Xfire most played" list. In which case he was rightfully fired.

  189. So Out of Touch by the0ther · · Score: 1

    Bloomberg is worse than Scrooge! What fucking planet is this guy living on? The only thing you can do is fill out a form on the mayor's website and tell him what an asshole he is. Maybe choose some different words but he really does deserve any bad word you can think of. The guy was making $27,000/year? That is peanuts in NYC and only about half of what you need to live here. And he now he's got no job at all. Piss off bloomberg

  190. Re:Sorry no time for photo u hypocrit mayor, I'm b by kaligraphic · · Score: 1

    >without even evidence of them suing the computer during office hours.

    Wow. You know you live in a litigious society when people start suing computers.

    --
    You are standing in an open server west of a blue house, with a boarded front door. There is an Exchange mailbox here.
  191. I got a plastic bubble blowing pipe. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1
    Then proceeded to blow bubbles when and where ever they were smoking (for about a week).

    Those bums were taking about 2 hours a day smoking. Generally not even thinking about work problems eather.

    I was starting to have trouble making deadlines (like all the smokers in the office) so I quit. My point had been made.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  192. Bloomberg, Whatta scumbag! by sesshomaru · · Score: 1
    Roger Toussaint, leader of the Transit Workers Union, addressing the mayor of New York:

    But what about our conducting an "illegal" strike? What about the law? You are all over the media with high-minded talk about "illegal" behavior, castigating criminals and screaming that no one is above the law. Your hypocrisy knows no bounds... You must hope everyone has forgotten your biography: "Bloomberg on Bloomberg..." I guess illegality is in the eye of the beholder.

    Naturally, I had to check this out for myself. Did the mayor of New York really boast about getting his company off the ground "all without permission, violating every fire law, building code and union regulation on the books"?

    On page 59 of this rather schlocky-looking memoir, Mayor Bloomberg admits to all of the above, adding, "it's amazing we didn't burn down some office..." -- When the spirit meets the letter

    --
    "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
  193. Edward Greenwood IX - what a cool name! by Kunt · · Score: 0

    Edward Greenwood IX, the ninth person called Edward in the Greenwood family, which means the tradition goes back nine generations or at least 9 x 30 years = 270 years, i.e., 1736. Probably further back than that! Also, it would make a damn good name for an operating system.

  194. your so anal , but... by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    Slashdot should get a clue too, hello mc fly, can you code a built in spell checker?

    Oh sorry, no you cannot otherwise you would need another dualcore server to do it.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  195. RIGHT ON THE MARK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great Comment!

    I hope the Voters FIRE this mayor for his small minded, facist behavior.

    He puts the 'JERK' in Knee-Jerk reactionism.

    When will he bring back public floggings, hangings, and sweat boxes?

    My question is: What Color was the fired man? What Religion was the fired man?
    It seems unlikely the mayor would treat 'one of his own' like this...

  196. Sales people's social network is their business... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most sales droids see their social network as their property.
    They have the relationships, they build the rapport. They make friends.

    And usually, if the business is a commodity type business,
    the sales people will gladly take almost all of their clients away from
    the company that is letting them go.

    A few phone calls, a few sweet discount deals, and suddenly dozens of accounts and hundreds of customers
    are gone - gone to the competition, to the other company that just hired the guy you fired.

    Smart Sales people keep all their client's customer info up-to-date,
    if they are gonna get the talk and take a walk - they don't need to bother with any company resources,
    they got backups at home, and will use them in there interview with their new employer.

    As long as everything is legal and above board, that makes a 'smart, aggressive salesperson!'

  197. Good riddens by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    Who would want to work at a place that doesn't let you play solitaire all day, and doesn't accept lame excuses about how it actually helps you do your job.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  198. I am forced to respond. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This post pissed me off. Cry my a river that you got fired from a cooshie job becuase you were slacking so bad you couldn't even click an X button.

    If you worked at a real job (example I'm a sprint relay operator) they monitor every *MINUTE* you are logged out of your computer. Every minute is work, or not work.

    For those of you who have jobs where you can fuck off all day long. Have fun while you can, because I really don't want to hear you cry when you have to get a real job.

    From the posts I've read so far modded +5 everybody on this fucking site are kids who live in their parents basements thinking they're gonna be some Maytag Sun guy who's gonna collect a 100K salary while sitting in an office reading slashdot.

    Those jobs are out there. (I know someone who had one, [the key word being had].) But if that's what the employes spending their time on, that companies not going to last long.

    I would fire anyone in a second for playing games while they were supposed to be working. This slashdot article is stupid whinging.

    I don't feel sorry for you at all you stupid fuck. As a matter of fact I'm glad you lost your job. Maybe I can aquire it, and I won't fuck around on the job either. I work hard for my money.

  199. Replaceable employee gets replaced... questions? by Americano · · Score: 0, Troll

    From TFA, they describe him as an "Office Assistant". On a whim, I went over to Monster and plugged in a search for "Office Assistant" in the Albany area. Here's a representative sample of what came back: Office Assistant Job Description.

    For everybody complaining about "thought breaks" and the like, this guy was NOT being paid to think deeply... he was being paid to do things like answer the phone... file, fax, and copy... type correspondence, etc. I don't mean to be disrespectful here, but the guy was doing a $13.50 an hour job that doesn't look like it's exactly going to put a lot of stress on the mental faculties. How much of a "thought break" does he need?

    If typing, filing, copying, and faxing is too much for him, I'm sure there's plenty of candidates who would be happy to step in and take over; We're not talking about skilled labor or a highly trained technical person here... this is a pretty basic, straightforward job.

  200. Thats the best thing to get fired over... by techstar25 · · Score: 1

    Think about it. When this guy applies for his next job he can say "I was fired for playing Solitaire, and not for lack of productivity." With 6 years on the job he obviously was getting his work done, or he never would have lasted that long. Any manager worth anything would recognize that the Solitaire firing is ridiculous. This guy should have no problem finding another job. It's one thing to be fired because you're incompetent, it's another to fired for playing games. I play games all day at work, but I also get my work done. I complete all tasks assigned to me, and thensome. I think most of us work that way. This isn't Burger King, where if you have free time, you had better be sweeping the floor or taking out the garbage. Things are different when you are dealing with educated adults.

    1. Re:Thats the best thing to get fired over... by pho3nixtar · · Score: 1

      The manager who fired him should go work for Burger King. He'd be perfect for the job. FYI, just because a person is working at Burger King doesn't mean they aren't educated...

  201. what I want to know is... by GeekyMike · · Score: 1

    what kind of guy doesn't lock his computer when away from his desk? If I think about getting 5' from my desk for longer than 30 seconds, that puppy is locked. Simple computer precautions could have saved that poor sap his job. Then again I make more than $27k/yr in a call center in Alabama, so his standard of living might actually improve.

    --
    Beware the fury of a patient man
    - John Dryden
  202. The finger ? Or a dimwit ? by chawly · · Score: 1

    Maybe the mayor thought he was being given the finger - since he was allowed to see (was shown) this console. Everybody I know has enough sense to "detect" when the boss is on the prowl. The other possibility that I can see is that this fellow is just a plain ordinary dimwit. Two things point to this - the salary for one and, for two, the fact that he does not appear to be planning to take the city to court over his firing.

    --
    How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley
  203. No Games on our PCs by donak · · Score: 1

    I work for the Queensland (state of Australia) government. All computers do not have games installed on them, as a matter of policy for some years now.
    Of course, just about everybody knows how to "install" something to wile away their spare time ...

    One man who was hired as an IT support officer couldn't leave his favourite game alone, and was constantly being "found" playing.

    Couldn't help people with problems, couldn't take the time to find a solution for them, but could rush back to his cubicle to recommence playing whatever it was. He got warned and warned again ... and eventually told "don't come Monday".

    We are allowed "reasonable personal use" of the Internet as a matter of policy, so the idea that we have to keep our "noses to the grind-stone" doesn't apply, but abuse of a privelege is still too much for most managers/supervisors.

    --
    Don't blame me, it's usually 2 in the morning when I post ...
  204. Who's computer was he playing it on? by BAY72267 · · Score: 1

    I heard it reported that the reason this guy was fired was because he was playing solitaire on Mayor Bloomberg's computer (as in - sitting in the mayor's office and playing)

  205. smokers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if smokers can take smoke breaks for 5-15 min every hour why cant gamers take 5-15 min game breaks every hour?

    1. Re:smokers by marcantonio · · Score: 1

      Being a former smoker, I can tell you it's true. I used to take 5 minutes and hour. For an 8 hour work day that's 40 minutes! Some people abuse this even more so.

  206. Making $27K in NYC after 6 years? by FishinDave · · Score: 1

    His firing was a blessing. There MUST be a better job waiting for him!

  207. Management by fear by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 1

    Nobody said he was indispensible. And if Bloomberg is the kind of boss that fire a random bottom-feeder for playing Solitaire, he will also be the kind of boss who will fire the bottom-feeders manager, if he choose to stand up for the bottom-feeder.

    Quickly, Bloomberg will find that all his actions are perfect, because nobody in the system will dare critize them.

    This kind of top-level micro-management by fear can actually work, if the boss is a maniac. Which, from your description, does sound like the case.

    Hopefully, the press will watching him carefully, because when this kindof management go wrong, it goes really wrong. We had a mayor here who left his small town (30.000 citizens) with a depth of 200 million dollars, after some ambitious ideas had gone wrong. Nobody had dared stop him, before the press finally unfolded the story.

  208. A more important question by tkrw · · Score: 1

    Who can live in NYC on $27,000/year?

  209. What a load of rubbish. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    You don't fire somebody for playing Solitaire. Period.

    What about if the guy in question is your best employee? There are people bound to cover all their objectives in less time than their normal working hours. If those people do something else once they have fullfilled all their work responsibilites, what is the problem with a bit of Solitaire?

    A firm willing to fire somebody for such a menial nonsense obviously does not have any metrics about employees' performance.

    Oh wait, it is a major. A politician. Somebody trying to be in the headlines appearing to be though.

    That explain his attitude, but it does not explain yours, you use all the managerial babble but without a really knowledge of the concepts involved.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  210. That may be good in two bit companies. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    In big corporations there are strict procedures in place to grant raises. Your boss may not even be the person with the final saying in the matter.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  211. Re:Probably? Try using a Pornograph! by aqk · · Score: 1

    Well, perhaps it's time you realized that the ponograph was replaced by CDs and DVD readers YEARS ago! ;-)

  212. He didn't get fired for playing. by mowph · · Score: 1

    Although it was the "grounds" for dismissal, he didn't get fired for PLAYING solitaire. He got fired for leaving it on his (virtual) desk when the highest-ranking official in the city was coming for a photo-op / inspection. You wouldn't leave a copy of Maxim or Cosmo or whatever on your desk in the same situation, and you sure as hell shouldn't have a game on your screen.

  213. Re:Violate guidelines; would you do one quake frag by Castar · · Score: 1

    I'm sure what happened in more detail is a boss walked by a few times in a week at varying times (11, 2p, 3p, etc) and saw half the time that this person was playing games instead of working. The employer has every right to kick them out. They're on someone elses dollar, so they damn-well be worth it

    If you read the article, you'll see that this was a special visit by the Mayor, not a habitual thing at all. The mayor noticed Solitare on his screen, and had a word with the guy's boss. So not only are we talking about losing your job over one infraction, but it's not left up to your manager's discretion - a VIP is putting his foot down!

    Of course, it was pretty stupid for the guy to be playing games when the VIP came to visit, but that's another issue.

    --
    I yearn for you tragically. A. T. Tappman, Chaplain, U.S. Army.