Slashdot Mirror


Experiences with DirecWay Satellite Internet

Since moving outside Ann Arbor almost 2 years ago, I've had only a 56k modem to tether my home to the net. Cable, DSL and ISDN are impossible in my location. DirecWay now offers the DW6000, which appears to be an operating system agnostic router for satellite internet access. I already use DirecTV, so this might work well. I'm aware of the game crippling latency, but that's not a huge deal to me. The monthly price seems reasonable, but is there a catch? I'm abusing my power as Slashdot editor to ask for experiences with this (or similiar) services. Does it bog down during the day? Not work with common hardware? Hidden costs? Does it cost a fortune for the required professional installation? Is ssh completely unusable?

771 comments

  1. No way by mr.henry · · Score: 5, Funny

    WTF.. the editor of Slashdot is on dialup?

    1. Re:No way by GoofyBoy · · Score: 3, Funny

      How much speed do you need to cut-and-paste a story from 3 hours ago?

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    2. Re:No way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is choice! No wonder there are so many dupes! Can't wait for the download to check for already submitted posts...

    3. Re:No way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You know, people make the statement that taco is out of touch with the slashdot community, and I dont think anything illustrates this point as much as the fact that he's on dialup.

      Probably uses AOL from his winme box too.

    4. Re:No way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      New AOL Express cuts his page loading times in half!

    5. Re:No way by destiney · · Score: 1


      Now that was funny.

    6. Re:No way by kfg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      One of the advantages of the "Internet Lifestyle" is that it lets you do your work from more and more remote places.

      One of the disadvantages of the "Internet Lifestyle" is that it lets you do your work from more and more remote places.

      Places where broadband isn't available.

      You might be surprised just how many geek gods are on dialup because they are geek gods. If they just lived in Altoona (or Ann Arbor) and delivered pizzas they could get cable service, but they can live anywhere they want and still work, so they go someplace nice.

      Personally I like mountains and oceans, but dragging a few thousand miles of coax behind you is a bitch. The bounce to the bird is irrelevant for downloads and uploads (you only experience the lag once), but a bitch for real time interaction.

      The geekiest people may well be the people with the worst internet service.

      KFG

    7. Re:No way by jayhawk88 · · Score: 1

      Hey, you got to give him props for having the balls to post this under his own username if anything.

      And besides, dial-up would probably be OK for your typical "log in and check the submission Q" thing, but it does make you wonder what happens when there's a problem.

    8. Re:No way by 8282now · · Score: 1

      .... but if you were a REAL geek god wouldn't you build & deploy your own los/nlos wireless connection? So you wouldn't be constrained by the local telco/cable providers, if one exists and replace them if not?

      just a thought...

    9. Re:No way by Oopsz · · Score: 3, Informative

      A true geek is always connected. The price of cellular internet has come down, and the speeds are going up, to the point where its feasible for full time use.

      Links:

      http://www.verizonwireless.com/b2c/mobileoptions /b roadband/index.jsp

      http://www.broadbandreports.com/faq/5668

      http://www.patents.com/pcs/

    10. Re:No way by caferace · · Score: 5, Interesting
      The geekiest people may well be the people with the worst internet service.

      That's a fairly profound statement, actually.

      Those of us with broadband can become info junkies, endlessly clicking and staring at all the eye candy.

      Those people stuck with dialup *can't* do the same (even with Lynx) and may be likely to spend more time doing something useful, like coding on Slash.

      Of course, Rob is so busy running around in his Lear jet to LW confs and naked BOF's that the only one that really suffers is Ms. Taco (heh), home with the wash and litter.

    11. Re:No way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was just thinking the same thing.

    12. Re:No way by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 0, Troll

      I recall someone once writing in their journal about how they messaged the editors to ask if they could explain what an ambiguous (not common and not made any clearer by the story) three-letter acronym (TLA) in a story summary was an abbreviation from. The reply back from Taco simply read "Sucks to be you".

      This is the guy who when politely asked by a reader (a subscriber too, if I remember correctly) to clarify what a certain TLA stands for fires off a sarcastic and snide reply. Yet he's surfing at home on a dial-up? I've just got one thing to say:

      Wow, Taco. Sucks to be you.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    13. Re:No way by warpSpeed · · Score: 5, Informative
      The geekiest people may well be the people with the worst internet service.

      If you have the $$$ there is nothing stopping you from getting a T1. You can get a T1 just about anywhere. The local telco may not like it, but they have to provide it.

    14. Re:No way by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 5, Funny

      Apparently that takes less bandwidth than a search for DirecWay on Google.

      --
      This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
    15. Re:No way by kfg · · Score: 1

      A true geek is always connected. The price of cellular internet has come down. . .

      How's cellular coverage at fifty-fifty? (That would be degrees north and west)

      KFG

    16. Re:No way by firstadopter.com · · Score: 1

      I find it simply amazing that Taco is on 56k. A leader in the internet revoluation doesn't even have broadband. Lol. Quite ironic and funny!

    17. Re:No way by turbofisk · · Score: 0

      Now we know why the site is so thin then... Almost no graphics... Would imagine that would take a while on 56k...

    18. Re:No way by hendridm · · Score: 1

      > but they can live anywhere they want and still work, so they go someplace nice.

      I guess it depends on your taste, but I think there are plenty of nice places to live that also have decent broadband options, especially if you're a millionaire.

    19. Re:No way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just goes to show you that assuming everyone has broadband is completely false. I hope those in charge of certain online games are reading this. :)

    20. Re:No way by DrunkenTerror · · Score: 1

      Maybe the TLA was SX2BU?

    21. Re:No way by Maxhrk · · Score: 0

      no wonder it managed not to be slashdotted. I think 56k defeated DSL in mystery way. I think i should get back on 56k to find out how did it work with his site!

    22. Re:No way by Oopsz · · Score: 1

      Not sure, but if you want internet off the coast of newfoundland, all the easy internet solutions seem right out.

    23. Re:No way by russotto · · Score: 1

      That's an HETLA.

    24. Re:No way by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

      No, a true geek would build their own rocket and launch their own communications satelite into a geo sync LEO!

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    25. Re:No way by eah · · Score: 1

      I wonder if it works the other way.

      Would it be easier to find a job if I cancelled my DSL and invested in a flock of pigeons?

      The look on grandma's face when I email her the latest baby pictures might just seal the deal. ;)

    26. Re:No way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like that wicked mechanic that can build a custom, souped up speed machine and then drives around in a 1983 Cutlass Supreme because he has parts for it....

    27. Re:No way by orthogonal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You know, people make the statement that taco is out of touch with the slashdot community, and I dont think anything illustrates this point as much as the fact that he's on dialup.

      I've got a better illustration. How about this:
      I already use DirecTV?

      I've vowed not to ever subscribe to DirecTV, because of DirecTV's policy of suing purchasers of smart card programming hardware, regardless of whether or not that hardware was used to intercept DirecTV's transmissions.

      That's pure harassment and barratry by a company that knows that even if it loses it can ruin its victims by running up their costs to defend themselves.

      And I know about this abuse of process and restraint of trade because I read about it, and the EFF's fight against it, on Slashdot: here and here and here.

      But is CmdrTaco taking a stand? Hell no! At the same time the EFF files an amicus brief with the 11th Circuit appeal of DirecTV's suit, CmdrTaco is paying DirectTV $25.00 a month (or whatever the subscription fee is) to sit back and watch reruns of Die Hard II.

      And people wonder why "Your Rights Online" keep getting trampled under by Big Corporations and Big Brother -- because even a so-called "geek leader" prefers sitting on his ass as a comfortable couch potato to standing up for a principle.

      Really Taco, I expected better from you. Stand up for something -- show some leadership -- and ditch your DirecTV in the most public way you can.

    28. Re:No way by stienman · · Score: 1

      If you have the $$$ there is nothing stopping you from getting a T1. You can get a T1 just about anywhere. The local telco may not like it, but they have to provide it.

      That should read:

      The local telco may charge so much for it that it ends up in their annual profit report, but they have to provide it.

      T1, just like ISDN, regular phone, etc cost more the further the wire. However, it does come with a service level agreement. You could charge it to OSDN by providing a tertiary DNS server for them.

      -Adam

    29. Re:No way by slaker · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Do *try* to recall that broadband isn't available everywhere. No, the right answer is not "move someplace else". There are huge numbers of people in suburban and rural parts of the USA where the choices are $100-a-month DirecWay (if you can get it. I couldn't due to "lay of the land" issues) or crappy dialup.

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    30. Re:No way by Stinking+Pig · · Score: 1

      Scotty! I need more slashdot subscriptions!

      We cannae do it cap'n! There's just not enough value to the users!

      Damn the users Scotty, I've got to pay for the home T1!

      --
      "Nothing was broken, and it's been fixed." -- Jon Carroll
    31. Re:No way by kfg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      By the same token if you have the $$$ you can get cable anywhere you can get a T1.

      Well, perhaps you might be surprised that a good many geek gods don't have $$$ because they've been doing geeky things instead of amassing $$$.

      I'm not a geek god. Maybe a Roshi. A grey ponytail. Larry can have fun playing with his Ferrari and Marchetti, but I'd slit my skinny geeky wrists before I'd do what he did to get them. I have just as much fun with my Schwinn and homemade scrounged bits and plastic sheeting hang glider.

      Or maybe a boat.

      Do you have a globe handy? You are a geek aren't you? Ah, well, they don't make geeks like they used to I guess. In my day. . . , well, nevermind.

      You've at least seen a globe. So picture that globe in your mind, rotate it up a bit. A bit more, Now to the left, more, more. . . .Stop!

      You are now looking at a globe that for all practical purposes is painted blue.

      Who is the local telco and will they run a T1 line there? Will they run another 100 miles away tomorrow?

      You are looking at the ground. Lift your head and broaden your horizon. It's a big world and it ain't all wired, or even wirable.

      Once upon a time, out in that patch of pure blue on the globe, a women alone in a small sailboat got into trouble. The only other person with any hope of coming to her aid was a man in another small sailboat. He was asleep at the time.

      How was he notified of the situation?

      Email.

      The big world gets smaller all the time. It is possible in some way to get connected from anywhere (although if you have to carry that way on your back over mountains it might be better to just forget about it).

      But that way will often have to eschew wires.

      KFG

    32. Re:No way by grub · · Score: 1


      Bravo! Well said.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    33. Re:No way by kfg · · Score: 1

      Yep, that star is right about where I plan to be in June 2006.

      KFG

    34. Re:No way by Obliterous · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm posting this up here because I think that taco REALLY needs to see this.

      I had direcWay for just under a year, and after 3 months, I hated it, with a passion.

      First, there's a 100MB/hour cap that they wont tell you about untill you hit it.

      Second, it's not as reliable as they want you to think it is. in a year I had less than 80% uptime.

      Third: their DNS server fails to include many `offensive' sites. if you want to go there, gotta find a 3rd party DNS server.

      Fourth: support is worthless. I averaged fourty minutes a call, just so they could tell Me their DNS machine was rebooting. (yes, ONLY one DNS server)

      fifth: it requires a USB connection to the modems (or at least, it did when I got mine) and that limited my max throughput to 1.2Mbit. When you think about it, that's not too bad, considering the 100MB/hour cap...

      sixth: their modem control software is buggy. P-3 800, Win2k-fresh install, and the direcWay software, it locked up at LEAST once a day. Nothing else on the box, and the box was load/stability tested when it was rebuilt.

      seven: they cant find their ass with both hands, a map, two guide dogs, a tour guide, and a case of montezuma's revenge.
      We wanted to upgrade to Hi-Def TV because we bought a new bigscreen, and the direcTV people took three weeks to get a technician out here. He took one look at the direcWay dish, and admited that he didn't have a frigin clue to how this was suposed to work.

      we called them back, told them about the problem, and they promised us a technician that knew how to set up hi-def with direcway. a week later, the same doofus came back.

      after five days on the phone with their supervisors supervisors, we cann'ed them. Much happier on our Hi-Def Dish Network System, and for the broadband, we went with Aire Networks

      I know they don't cover you out there, taco, but I hope for your sake that there is something similar. after 3 months with direcWay, /. would probably have to find a new editor.

    35. Re:No way by warpSpeed · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The local telco may charge so much for it that it ends up in their annual profit report, but they have to provide it.

      They can charge as much as they want, but they have to use the same formula to determine a rate for everyone in that LATA. A T1 is a tarrifed service which has to pass the local PUC sniff test (not that it is difficult to do...)

      I have multiple T1s to my place, and the local data loop guys that installed them remind me every time they are on a service call to my place, "You know that you are over 22000 ft from the CO? We have 2 repeaters on each T1 to get here."

      I just smile and tell them that I know. For the most part the lines are rock solid too.

    36. Re:No way by stevew · · Score: 1

      Hmm - if the guy can't get an ISDN line - he likely can't get a T1 either. ISDN can be repeated so he REALLY must be living in the boonies, or the world's oldest Central office that doesn't support ISDN (or morse code ;-)

      --
      Have you compiled your kernel today??
    37. Re:No way by dissy · · Score: 1

      > You might be surprised just how many geek gods are on dialup because they are geek gods.

      Just to add my 'me-too' post:

      I too am on a dedicated dialup. My ISP routes a /24 and /26 to me over it.
      In the area I am in, cable is the only other option availible (Horidly old phone wiring, cant even get isdn or a t1), but I can not run services nor get decent IP space and no reverse DNS control on cable here. Just not worth my time as a geek.

      One of my bots on IRC i run from this dialup has an idle time of
      [] idle: 41d 2h 8m 11s [Tue Dec 16 12:29:19 2003]

      No one I know on cable/dsl has stability like that.

      I am planning to move soon to an area where a T1 will be possible. But till then, long live the dialup.

    38. Re:No way by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Hell T-Mobile will sell you mobile internet for only 29.98 of course their network isn't as expansive as verizon's I guess, though if traveling abroad you can connet to GPRS for only an additional $1.5/KB haha ekkk :(

    39. Re:No way by warpSpeed · · Score: 1
      Well, perhaps you might be surprised that a good many geek gods don't have $$$ because they've been doing geeky things instead of amassing $$$.

      I am by no means a geeky god (but I occasionally play one in my neighborhood) I do geeky things for a living and for fun, but I am not ammasing $$$. I just happen to run a small ISP that pays for the T1's to my place. It is more of a hobby really. And this hobby lets me do (what I consider) fun geeky things. I also sleep well at night, not having to compromse my morals to amass oodles of $$$

      You are now looking at a globe that for all practical purposes is painted blue.

      Sarcasm aside, you are correct about the globe being covered by water. However I doubt that most of the people here (/.) live on the ocean, bay, lake, etc. Most people, in general, have access of some sort or another to a local telco monopoly. If not satellite is you next best bet.

    40. Re:No way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dialup would be a step up from HNS/DirecPC/DirecWay. You've gotta wonder why they've changed their name so many times. If you think the caps on cablemodems are bad, you ain't seen nothin'! A hundred megs or so and they cut you off at the knees. No joke. I had DPC running side-by-side with a dedicated (24/7) 56k dialup connection. My roommates stopped asking to use the DPC system after a month or so. Just 'cause they changed the name to DirecWay doesn't mean their service has improved.

      Stay the hell away from satellite unless you can't even get a solid 28.8 connection.

    41. Re:No way by katorga · · Score: 1

      I agree with this post. I'm firmly entrenched into the "internet generation" and rely on internet access to do my job as a unix sysadm and for liesure activities.
      At the same time, I got sick of the crowding, development, taxes and general cost of living of the urban center where I work.
      Luckily, I could move 30 miles outside of town, get 11 acres and a decent house, and be totally rural. Heck, I have wild turkeys outside my window in the mornings. The trade off, I am 10 miles from the nearest cable model fiber and the telco does not have a DLSAM for ISDN installed in my slick. Its dial up for me too and its worth it.

    42. Re:No way by sirket · · Score: 1

      I have DirecTV also. I got the service long before they started the lawsuit crap and just after they stopped requiring the receivers be connected to a phone line at all times (which made it seem like they were lightening up instead of becoming assholes). At this point I have so much money invested in hardware that just ditching it would be a shitty idea. (3 Receivers, my DirecTivo, Lifetime subscription, switch box, etc.)

      You also have to look at the alternatives. His cable company is probably Cox or one of the other equally evil cable companies. Some of us enjoy BBC too much to do without it entirely which is the only other real solution.

      -sirket

    43. Re:No way by kfg · · Score: 1

      Would it be easier to find a job if I cancelled my DSL and invested in a flock of pigeons?

      Not a job, per se, but you could make a living. There are people who will pay good money for a pigeon.

      CPIP Packet Loss

      KFG

    44. Re:No way by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      But seriously, are the cable companies any better?
      (Yes I know CmdrTaco probably can't even get cable, but thats not my point.)

    45. Re:No way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "One of the advantages of the "Internet Lifestyle" is that it lets you do your work from more and more remote places.

      One of the disadvantages of the "Internet Lifestyle" is that it lets you do your work from more and more remote places."

      Then it's neither an advantage or disadvantage, is it? Perhaps you mean to say that it's different?

      Sorry, that annoys me about as much the "1 2 3 Profit!" jokes annoy most people.

    46. Re:No way by jerw134 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the telco does not have a DLSAM for ISDN installed in my slick.

      Well it would be kind of hard for them to have a DSLAM for ISDN, since no such thing exists! DSLAM stands for Digital Subscriber Line Access Multiplexor. ISDN != DSL.

    47. Re:No way by sharkdba · · Score: 1

      But at least no one has to be ashamed of their internet connection anymore...

      Or how about this pickup line:
      "Hey, why don't you go home with me. I have better internet connection than editor at slashdot. You know, THE slashdot..."

      --
      The purpose of life is to find the purpose of life.
    48. Re:No way by Oopsz · · Score: 1

      Microcell's $50CDN unlimited mobile internet plan includes unlimited GPRS in the united states as well as canada. Good to know if you use them.

    49. Re:No way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really. I'm ditching Bresnan Digital Cable for a few reasons.

      When the digital cable box is on, it does not pass analog signals through the coaxial cable, this makes viewing an analog channel while recording something else more difficult requiring you split before the box.

      The box claims Dolby Digital sound, yet has no digital outputs! Only a stereo RCA out. This may as well be analog sound.

      It only has composite video out, no s-video let alone component.

      Half your channels are still analog.

      ESPN has MONO sound, as do half the cable networks - even though the network broadcasts in stereo.

      They are bandwidth limited and all digital networks are overcompressed. This causes noticeable artifacting that doesn't exist with satellite. Fishing shows with lots of water shots are the worst, it breaks down into tiles almost immediately and looks like ass.

      The cable guy was an jerk, and accused me of not knowing how to wire my system (he insisted on running coax to box, out box to vcr, out vcr to tv) and said that is the only way it will work properly (bullsnot!).

      When we complained about the quality of Fox News on analog, they said "well its not a digital network"... Funny but sattelite gives it to you in digital.

      I could go on for days with other complaints, but I will leave you with this last one.

      With satellite, you get more channels, better quality, and more freedom to wire it how you want without the cable guy insulting you, for less money.

      That said I have Bresnan Cable Internet service, which by being a cable TV subscriber i receive a $10 discount on my internet. So for a total difference of $3 a month more I can get basic cable and internet still + satellite. This gets me my local channels easily etc. If i wanted it.

      Now just to convince the wife to let me get a receiver with a PVR in it ;)

    50. Re:No way by ibpooks · · Score: 1

      Big fuckin' deal.

    51. Re:No way by kfg · · Score: 1

      . . . I doubt that most of the people here (/.) live on the ocean, bay, lake, etc.

      This is no doubt true. However turning things around a bit changes the situation. There are some thousands who live afloat away from traditional services by choice and tens of thousands who do so by profession.

      On the whole they are a remarkably tech savy and resourceful group of people. When your life depends on some gadget and that gadget ceases to function you fix it or die. It focuses the mind in a way that "I wonder what will happen if I compile this" just doesn't.

      Internet service for these people is a real issue.

      Most people, in general, have access of some sort or another to a local telco monopoly.

      On the other hand I'm not sure that this is true at all. What's more there are plenty of places where there is local phone service and you're simply not going to be able to get a T1 line. You can't even buy out the company. I'd hazard a guess there are at least a few thousands of Slashdotters who fall into this catagory and certainly millions of internet users. Perhaps hundreds of millions.

      If not satellite is you next best bet.

      Indeed, and the subject of the Slashdot "story."

      And it sucks, but sometimes ya do what ya gotta do.

      KFG

    52. Re:No way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They require Phone lines constantly connected now? That's funny, mine is working just fine without it.

      Or is it one of those "features" of the newer model sattelite boxes?

    53. Re:No way by josephpate · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's why I love Opera so much, Disable Images by default then with a click of a button (two clicks, actually) they load for you.

      In truth, this is the only feature stopping me from switching to Mozilla (Although I do like Opera's tabbed browsing much more than Moz's)

    54. Re:No way by mlrtime · · Score: 1


      Why all the problems with DNS? Can't you use most *any* dns server you want to?

    55. Re:No way by kfg · · Score: 1

      Then it's neither an advantage or disadvantage, is it?

      No. It is both an advantage and a disadvantage at the same time.

      Most things are since they exist in some state of compromise. Making things different is only adjusting the slider on the compromise mixer.

      KFG

    56. Re:No way by looie · · Score: 4, Insightful
      And people wonder why "Your Rights Online" keep getting trampled under by Big Corporations and Big Brother -- because even a so-called "geek leader" prefers sitting on his ass as a comfortable couch potato to standing up for a principle.

      well, everybody has their hobby horse. i'll bet if i look at your credit card statements, i'll see a raft of purchases from amazon.com, one of the more morally corrupt net establishments. probably, some payouts or receipts from ebay, too. ditto for that group. you probably have a closet full of clothes made in china because they're cheap and you aren't too concerned about how they got that way.

      i once went two years without a phone because i had a tiff with the phone company. all that did was make it hard for people to reach me. it's more important to pick your fights and win them than it is to go around thumping your chest and proclaiming your own "purity." i don't give a damn whether you're pure if you're a jerk -- i don't want to know you and neither does anyone else.

      that's why, for example, the quakers are a religious body known the world over, even though they comprise a tiny fraction of the christian population. and that's why the eff doesn't pick up every case that comes along. they won't waste effort on a case they don't think they can win. there are plenty of moral causes that invite attention -- go to GreenPeace if you can't think of any. DirecTV isn't even on my radar.

      just because you own a keyboard doesn't mean you're required to type on it.

      mp

      --
      "The secret to strong security: less reliance on secrets." -- Whitfield Diffie
    57. Re:No way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have a ranch in Montana. The nearest town of any size (pop. 7000) is seventy miles away. Will they run a T1 line out to us? I doubt it.

      Modem speeds are abysmal out there, as well - we are talking 33kbps as maximum, best case - usually more like 20.

      I have been looking at the problem, as well, and am thinking of DirectWay.

    58. Re:No way by CharlieHedlin · · Score: 1

      If the DNS issues are so bad, just use someone else DNS. All (or maybe only most by now) the tier 1 ISPs DNS servers will respond to a query.

      Points 5 and 6 were eliminated because Taco is looking at using their new router, not the old stuff.

      I have used ssh on the old system, and found it to be sufficiently usable. Its significantly better than ssh on a dialup link that is also running an ftp.

      My only complaint has been their broken NAT implementations. VPN, server processes, etc, you are just flat out of luck. Make sure you pay the extra (I believe it is quite a bit extra) to get a routable IP.

    59. Re:No way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a pointless bot!

    60. Re:No way by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Dude, the directv tivo only cost 99 dollars, and is only 5 dollars a month for the tivo service. Alot cheaper than the 250 + 10 dollars a month.

    61. Re:No way by orthogonal · · Score: 2

      well, everybody has their hobby horse. i'll bet if i look at your credit card statements, i'll see a raft of purchases from amazon.com....

      No, you wouldn't. I avoid buying from Amazon, both because of the "One-Click" patent, and because of some issues with Amazon not removing addresses from their email lists when requested to.

      True, I won't return a gift if a relative purchases something from Amazon.

      just because you own a keyboard doesn't mean you're required to type on it.

      That's a dismissive ad-hominem attack that's designed to suggest my opinions aren't relevant, while at the same not requiring you to present any evidence of that or counter-argument to my opinions. While I congratulate you on your ability to learn from Karl Rove, I'll also suggest that real discussion and debate are more valuable than smirking slams.

      As to the issue itself, you are right that we have to choose our battles; some injustices are greater threats than others.

      I submit that what DirecTV's barratry is an injustice that deserves our attention. Anytime we allow a private corporation to declare that a particular technology is illegitimate just because it might be used to infringe that business's copyright, we allow any technology that threatens any corporation's bottom line to be arbitrarily declared off-limits.

      Smart card programming hardware today, non-DRM'd motherboards tomorrow. This is a major issue, perhaps the central issue, as far as technological freedom is concerned. It's something that every Slashdot reader should rally around.

      So yes, we must choose our battles, but how can we not choose this battle?

      As far as CmdrTaco is concerned, I was perhaps overly harsh -- I lead from my heart -- in my first post. I respect CmdrTaco and what he has built in Slashdot, and so was even more amazed to learn he subscribes to DirecTV.

      I hope that CmdrTaco, aware of his influence and the respect he is accorded, will reconsider his decision to subsidize DirecTV, and consider leading by example in what is nothing less than a fight for out freedoms.

    62. Re:No way by dissy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      If you concider holding ops pointless... but im sure your just a troll that knows not of such technical matters as irc.

    63. Re:No way by ewieling · · Score: 1

      You have obviously never run a telnet or ssh session over the Verizon Mobile IP service.

      --
      I really shouldn't have used someone else's email address for this account.
    64. Re:No way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're still better than Starband.

      I've installed both.

    65. Re:No way by mhesseltine · · Score: 2, Funny
      No, a true geek would build their own rocket and launch their own communications satelite into a geo sync LEO!

      Am I the only one who read that as "into a geo sync LEGO "?

      If you can create a telecom satelite out of a Mindstorms kit, you should be working for LEGO (or the government)

      --
      Overrated / Underrated : Moderation :: Anonymous Coward : Posting
    66. Re:No way by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Go easy on him. He did say he starts hitting the Wild Turkey early in the morning.

      --
      taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
    67. Re:No way by vlag · · Score: 1

      been there, done that. I spent 2 summers fishing from a freezer trawler between Newfoundland, Baffin Island and Greenland. It was the most fantastic experience of my life (so far). Sounds horrible but the views, the never-setting sun were incredible.

      --
      Do you want to remove linux?
    68. Re:No way by fred911 · · Score: 1

      If I'm not mistaken newsdatacom was sueing smartcard programer buyers. NDC owns the encryption not DirectTV.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    69. Re:No way by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      One of my bots on IRC i run from this dialup has an idle time of
      [] idle: 41d 2h 8m 11s [Tue Dec 16 12:29:19 2003]

      No one I know on cable/dsl has stability like that.


      I'm not trying to nitpick or anything, but my cablemodem has stayed up more than 3 times that long..... and that's only because I rebooted my firewall to update it's kernel.
      (Phoenix, AZ... Cox Cable)

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    70. Re:No way by timeOday · · Score: 1
    71. Re:No way by dissy · · Score: 1

      Do you keep any persistant TCP connections to verify that?
      It's not that I don't believe you or anything, its just a 5 minute outage is generally not even noticed or felt if you dont have an always active TCP connection.

      Despite it being labeled 'idle time' that only refers to irc privmsg (text to a person/channel)... Mode changes and joins/parts dont break an idle time.
      Its just a very quiet bot ;)

    72. Re:No way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can claim it is a compromise, if you want, but it is not both an advantage and a disadvantage. Parts of it are to your advantage, others may be to your disadvantage, but on a whole it can be one, the other, or neither. That's like saying that a=1+2i and b=2+1i then claiming that ab because different parts are greater. On a whole they are equal in magnatude, abs(a)=abs(b). They just go in different directions.

    73. Re:No way by budgenator · · Score: 1

      The Ann Arbor area has a lot of companies that'll install your T1 or partial-T, internet and local-long distance telephone sevice into one package. last time we looked at it it was almost cost effective for a dental office, and that was about 6 years ago, competion for the dollar has gotten a bit stiffer since then.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    74. Re:No way by sam*stsw · · Score: 1

      Hey! It takes a special kind of geek to appreciate technology at its worst. I too live out in the middle of nowhere broadband is not an option. I've left downloads going for days on end many times. It teaches you to savior the little bandwidth you have.

    75. Re:No way by jrockway · · Score: 1

      CmdrTaco has no obligation to do anything. He runs this site. That's all. He doesn't control the content. He may *love* DirectTV for all I know. That's his business.

      Without his site, though, you probably wouldn't even know that DirectTV was evil. So maybe he helped you out in the long run.

      He's helped us all. Don't say that you don't like slashdot. I love it. I don't care what Taco's morals are. His idea of the techno-blog (what it's apparently called now... ewww) was revolutionary, and it's worth coming back to today (thanks to people like you who post good comments!). It's a community and the leader may disagree with you. That's OK, right?

      --
      My other car is first.
    76. Re:No way by j3110 · · Score: 1

      You can claim it is a compromise, if you want, but it is not both an advantage and a disadvantage. Parts of it are to your advantage, others may be to your disadvantage, but on a whole it can be one, the other, or neither. That's like saying that a=1+2i and b=2+1i then claiming that ab because different parts are greater. On a whole they are equal in magnatude, abs(a)=abs(b). They just go in different directions.

      I hate it when slashdot tries to parse as html in "plain old text" mode.

      --
      Karma Clown
    77. Re:No way by demachina · · Score: 1

      I think you are talking about Direcway of a while ago, not today at least it hasn't been my experience in the last year. As the original question said we are talking about the DW6000. Its a standalone appliance with no Windows needed which knocks down points 5 and 6. Your bitching about the old DW4000 modem, using USB, and Windows in all its horrible, unrealiable glory.

      It must have been really bad when you used it or your installation was screwed up. Uptime is certainly in the 99+% range for me, and its gotten nothing but better with the new DW6000 modem. So I disagree with point 2. They do reboot stuff on their satellite or in their NOC occassionally. Big deal.

      I've never had any problems with DNS either not being there at all or not knowing about addresses. Maybe you have a really offensive taste, as in illegal, in web sites. So I disagree with point 3 also.

      As I've said in other posts the fair use policy is a good things for their user community as whole. If your a blatant bandwidth hog, yea its not for you, of course neither is a dialup so I dont think point 1 is much of an issue in the context of this discussion.

      Point 7, so you got a DIrectTV installer that was clueless about DirecWay. Not very suprising since there are a lot more DirectTV's installs than there are DirecWay installs.

      The only point I agree with is 4, yes their tech support really and truly sucks. Same can be said of pretty much every company whose fallen for the Accenture sales pitch and hired a bunch of clueless, cheap, offshore workers who have no expertise about or knowledge in the product they are supporting and are sitting there reading FAQ's back to ya until you get fed up and hang up. You can thank execs who value profit margin over service and that is true just about every company these days. Get used to it.

      --
      @de_machina
    78. Re:No way by warpSpeed · · Score: 1
      Glad to hear that there is some competition going on up there. The same competition is happening around here too. However the biggest problem to wider deploment is overall cost. The copper is the most expensive part of getting stable internet service. Unless there is movement to reduce the cost to deliver service, and willingness to deploy the serivce on the part of the telcos getting service will remain expensive.

      DSL is great but has many limitations. It would be nice to see other services similar to DSL being developed and deployed by the telcos. Until there is some competition cattle prodding the telcos into doing it though, don't hold your breath.

    79. Re:No way by Cramer · · Score: 1

      When you go to a drug dealer to buy oregano, don't be surprised when the cops knock your door down. These people were buying hardware from places they KNEW were not entirely above board. Yes, DTV caught a few dolphins in with their tuna, but you don't hear about all those tuna. 99% (or better) of the purchases from those sites were from people planning to steal service -- and intent is all that matters. If you want a smartcard programmer for a legal project, they can be obtained from proper, reputable, legal venders. (and yes, they're more expensive than the 20$ hacker junk.)

      This is no different from buying guns from a guy in an alley. Or a cable TV box from any number of spams.

    80. Re:No way by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "If you have the $$$ there is nothing stopping you from getting a T1."

      Yeah, and we all know Taco is rolling in it now thanks to all of the /. subscriptions...

    81. Re:No way by bahgheera · · Score: 1

      I've vowed not to ever subscribe to DirecTV, because of DirecTV's policy of suing purchasers of smart card programming hardware, regardless of whether or not that hardware was used to intercept DirecTV's transmissions. That's pure harassment and barratry by a company that knows that even if it loses it can ruin its victims by running up their costs to defend themselves.

      Long time lurker emerges from shadows for first post on /.

      ...so let's get on with it...

      Please bro! Everyone knows what happens to smartcard gear as soon as it hits the average guys hands....he uses it to steal DirecTV!

      Deep down you and I and everyone else know that setting up hot cards is *stealing* and that it's *wrong*, no matter what argument you come up with to justify it. And I've heard them all, believe me.

      Laters...

    82. Re:No way by orthogonal · · Score: 1

      CmdrTaco has no obligation to do anything.

      Of course he doesn't.

      He's helped us all. Don't say that you don't like slashdot.

      I didn't say I don't like slashdot. I like it a lot, nd I respect CmdrTaco for his efforts to realize his vision of Slashdot. (And I appreciated getting to an "Excellent Karma" after being here only a month.)

      Criticizing one thing that Taco does or does not do is in no way tantamount to disliking Slashdot or CmdrTaco. Indeed, it's a measure of my respect for Taco that I criticized him at all; I would not have been surprised, if, for instance, Darl McBride announced he was a DirecTV subscriber, nor would I have wasted any breath trying to convince Darl McBride to act from his principles.

      Too many people these days equate any criticism with enmity or disloyalty. This is especially prevalent in the current U.S. administration: any dissent, any questioning of policy is tarred as giving aid to "the terrorists".

      It's because I'm a patriot that I question the "Patriot Act"; it's because I respect Taco and enjoy Slashdot that bother to point out the ideological dimensions of his decision to support DirecTV.

      (thanks to people like you who post good comments!). It's a community and the leader may disagree with you. That's OK, right?

      Of course it's OK if someone disagrees. Who knows, I might even be wrong. Highly unlikely, of course. <grin> Discussion and debate -- and not down-mods -- are what makes Slashdot so valuable. (And thanks for the praise.)

    83. Re:No way by Mr.+Jaggers · · Score: 1

      Yeah, except here in Alaska, where the APUC are notoriously tight-assed, and live in the back pocket of our *two* real telecom companies, ACS (alaska communication systems or something) and GCI (general communication inc.), both of which are the Evil Empire for Alaskans... broadband prospects are basically nil if you live in the sticks. I know that we have a local DirecTV 'franchise' to install and distribute in town, but really, it's a joke.

      And if you *do* get the local telco to lay a loop for you, and take it in the rear with all the regulatory fees and such, the cheapest T1 is close to $3000, and from the local telco, between $10,000 and $12,000 just for ONE. Yep, that's the same T1 as can be had for under $500 down south... except setup probably costs more.

      Oh, yeah, I guess we do have a third party option (other than the two Evil Empires that don't offer service to my house...). Just take a gander at the wireless cable modem page on Alaska Wireless Cable's site to see why it's tough to take them seriously...

      So, guess what old-fashioned device *I* have to use to get connectivity? Yep, that's right, the ol' external Courier v.Everything.

      --

      When I grow up, I want to have Christopher Walken hair.
    84. Re:No way by kfg · · Score: 1

      I'll be aiming for the Orkneys from there with a BikeFriday stashed somewhere aboard. Spend the summer pottering about the British Isles, then run for the Azores when the weather starts to turn.

      Gotta finish the boat the raise some cash first though.

      KFG

    85. Re:No way by kfg · · Score: 1

      You can claim it is a compromise, if you want. . .

      Q.E.D.

      Please restate your premise with "i" not as a constant but as a variable that changes randomly and subjectively.

      KFG

    86. Re:No way by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1
      They are bandwidth limited and all digital networks are overcompressed. This causes noticeable artifacting that doesn't exist with satellite.
      I don't know; satellite seems oversompressed to me.
      My parents have DirecTV and the artifacting of dark grays especially is very distracting.
      Shows about astronomy or deep-sea exploration, where there is a lot of dark in the picture, are sometimes difficult to watch because of the noticable pixellation in the dark areas.
      The other thing that I don't like is that the settop unit sometimes takes several seconds to respond to a button press in the remote.
      --
      Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
    87. Re:No way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And every bit of your comment is irrelevant to DWay today.

      There are 2 levels of service, consumer and pro. Both now use the DS6000 modem. This unit is OS/platform agnostic, and any software updating is directly to the unit. The DS 6000 also connects via ethernet to the rest of your network, and recently they have indeed reversed policy on natting a home network, allowing it.

      Both levels of services have caps. The caps function over an 8 hour period, when you hit your cap, you are throttled down to 56k equivalent. At the low end you get 100mb per 8 hours, pro gets you 384mb.

      Consumer level is nat'd meaning no direct addressing, they also do NOT guarantee that you can establish a VPN style connection. Pro level nets an externally addressable permenant IP address.

      VPN connectivity is approximately equivalent to 56k dialup, and of course you have a significant delay in each character typed.

      Dialup in my area is limited to 26.4 if you're lucky, with fairly consistent disconnects. Satellite is the only option barring a T1. Hmm... $550 a month (cheapest/worst provider) compared to $90 a month with equivalent hardware costs.

      No brainer.

    88. Re:No way by druzicka · · Score: 1

      I too am on a dedicated dialup. My ISP routes a /24 and /26 to me over it.

      Ok, I'll bite:

      What do you do with 316 IP addresses? One IP is typically sufficient for a single PC, so I can't imagine that you're hosting Internet-accessible servers or providing Internet access for hundreds of hosts through a dial-up connection.

      Are you?

      --
      If Happy Fun Ball begins to smoke, get away immediately. Seek shelter and cover head.
    89. Re:No way by looie · · Score: 1
      just because you own a keyboard doesn't mean you're required to type on it.

      That's a dismissive ad-hominem attack that's designed to suggest my opinions aren't relevant, while at the same not requiring you to present any evidence of that or counter-argument to my opinions.

      as a matter of fact, it is rather a suggestion that you think first and then post. being accused of writing a "smirking slam" by a guy who had just posted a 30-line smirking slam against rob malda is, well, laughable.

      i've been active in probably 1/2 dozen political movements and your holier-than-though chest-thumping makes you a poster boy for reasons not to join another one. that, sadly, is another point you don't get.

      it's easy enough to tell people to "do without" when you're not the one who has to follow through. i'm sure you're more than willing to tell your wife "no, we're not having any tv in the house because directv is the only provider available" or, "i'm not doing business with sbc, so the phone has to go," or even, "i'm not having anything made in china by slave labor, so this computer is out the door." and then, of course, you don't use a dvd player, don't buy any music cd's from members of riaa, don't rent movies from blockbuster or hollywood, don't have a computer with ms-windows on it ... and so on and so forth.

      like i wrote, everybody has a hobby horse.

      mp

      --
      "The secret to strong security: less reliance on secrets." -- Whitfield Diffie
    90. Re:No way by hymie3 · · Score: 1

      That's why I love Opera so much, Disable Images by default then with a click of a button (two clicks, actually) they load for you.

      I'm on 40K dialup (that's the fastest that I can connect at--no chance for cable or DSL or even ISDN), and Opera is a life-saver.

      "g" toggles the mode between show graphics, show place holders, and turn images off.

      "Control G" turns off CSS styling for the web page you're viewing. (I use the accessibility layout--most web pages I surf for pure info look better this way).

      These two keyboard options are at the top of my list of "things that keep me from switiching to Mozilla from opera".

      (btw, "q" and "a" move forward and backward through links on the page)

    91. Re:No way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So tell me, just what exactly *can* I do with a smart card programmer if I do not have DSS or family/friends with it? Messing with the smartcard I have for work? Messing with my American Express Blue card? After all, smart cards are SO pervasive in our everyday lives...

      Would you sympathise with me if I collected and repaired heavy machine guns (12.7mm, .50cal, etc), and was tired of dealing with the ATF and the local cops always wanting to look at who I traded guns with, how I got them, where they went, etc., or just wanted to make my own distiller so I can make my own distilled spirits, again dealing negatively with the ATF?

      Everybody should be able to make their own vodka, brandy, tequila, rum and whiskey, right? After all, we can make our own beer and wine, and you don't see the ATF busting down the doors of your local wine or beer equipment seller, do you?

      With your stance on smartcard readers, do you also equally support people who buy and sell hacked cable TV equipment?

    92. Re:No way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...which is why DirecTV has brought the smartcard development and distribution inhouse.

    93. Re:No way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...then how exactly do they do IDSL? (DSL over IDSN)?

  2. PEI by xenocyst · · Score: 4, Informative

    a remote co-worker has it up in prince edward's island and it seems to work pretty well for her

    --
    And, no, I should not have used the goddamn Preview mode first.
    1. Re:PEI by vladkrupin · · Score: 1

      a remote co-worker has it up in prince edward's island and it seems to work pretty well for her

      For doing what? Last time I checked, due to its large (and inconsistent) latency, satellite connection was great only for things like web surfing, email and downloading stuff.

      Guess what? - Not only games suffer from latency. Ever tried to ssh over a channel that has pings on the order of 300-ish? It hurts to think about that experience.

      Can anyone on a satellite connection can ping a couple of well-connected servers, like www.kernel.org or yahoo and post numbers here? Thanks!

      --

      Jobs? Which jobs?
    2. Re:PEI by parksie · · Score: 2, Informative

      I do it regularly from work over a 600ms latency link. In an ssh session, normally takes about 1s for a single typed character to echo back. I get used to it, but it tends to promote typos that I don't catch until later :(

    3. Re:PEI by shepd · · Score: 1

      DirecPC from Canada is a totally different animal than DirecPC from the US. So different they are run by different companies and on different satellites (DirecPC Canada runs on Nimiq 1 / Nimiq 2).

      Partly because of the price. DirecPC Canada charged $100 per GB when they opened, ensuring they had the cash to stay alive and fast. They're down to $20 per GB, still an outrageous (but probably necessary) price.

      DirecPC US prefers to charge less, in exchange for throttling heavy users.

      Pick your poisons!

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    4. Re:PEI by vladkrupin · · Score: 2, Funny

      I know how that goes -

      So, how many backspaces do I need to type to fix that typo? I think 7. (pressing backspace 7 times and starting to type again before the chage has shown on the screen). Oh, cripes! That should've been 6! Now, how many backspaces do I need to type to fix that? It sure looks like 5 (typing 5 backspaces, which is correct; resume typing). Cripes, I forgot which letter I was on, and resumed typing from the wrong one! Arghhh!!! How many backspaces would that be again?

      --

      Jobs? Which jobs?
    5. Re:PEI by xenocyst · · Score: 1

      nothing interactive, yet... basically all she's doing is (s)ftping in and pulling files and then putting them back when she's done... it is however a huge improvement from dialup because she can get a 35mb mp3 to transcribe without it taking all day + night.. (for example) as far as i can tell the latency is as bad as dialup, not worse tho.. and the throughput it reasonable ssh is probably a disaster.. but i've never been there to try it...

      --
      And, no, I should not have used the goddamn Preview mode first.
  3. Satellite internet by pardasaniman · · Score: 4, Funny

    Features: Space age technology Really means your ping times will be comparable to that of the mars rover.

    1. Re:Satellite internet by jeabus · · Score: 1

      If you're on Mars.

      --

      Save me Jeabus!

    2. Re:Satellite internet by Hel+Toupee · · Score: 1

      Funny, since all the rover is doing at the moment is returning pings.

      --
      PERL:
      All of the power of Voodoo with most of the understandibility!
    3. Re:Satellite internet by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 1

      That a rover with or without buggy software?

  4. I find it odd... by The_Rippa · · Score: 3, Funny

    That the only guy on Slashdot with a 56k is the guy that started it

    1. Re:I find it odd... by LnxAddct · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why wasn't this an option in the "Failure as a Geek" poll last week :)

    2. Re:I find it odd... by gandy909 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunatly, not the only guy... :(

      The local cable company refuses to put cable modem in, and as the city farts recently extended their contract by another 10 years, it doesn't look too good for getting it anytime in the forseeable future. SBC won't upgrade their equipment in our town either. All I can ever get is a blah blah not scheduled blah blah. Except for the last time I spoke to a rep on another matter she screwed up I think because she specifically said they weren't expanding the service much anywhere, because legislation they wanted didn't get passed.

      --

      (Stolen sig) Remember: it's a "Microsoft virus", not an "email virus", a "Microsoft worm", not a "computer worm
    3. Re:I find it odd... by Alric · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think you would be surprised how many developers have 56k at home. I have looked into DirecWay also; as I happen to live just between two cities. DSL might come in a year or two, but I doubt cable will be available for the next five years.

      The truth is that I don't need more than 56k. I work long hours, and our netadmin is cool at my employer. He doesn't mind if I d/l legal music or non-business ISO's. I can get pretty much whatever I want; his only rule is that we don't use any P2P programs and blocks the standard ports. And you know what, when I get home late at night or have the weekend off, I don't really want to sit in front of my computer very much. I'd rather talk to my fiance or go outside or do ANYTHING different from what I do 60 hrs/week.

      I understand the great beauty of an always-on connection, and if broadband were cheaply available, I'd take it. My point is just that many of us here love computers and programming, but we get so much of it during the work week that we really don't care much about having broadband at home.

      Having a good dev laptop also helps assuage the need for broadband.

    4. Re:I find it odd... by dasmegabyte · · Score: 4, Funny

      "56k should be enough for everybody." --Cmdr Taco

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    5. Re:I find it odd... by vladkrupin · · Score: 1

      That the only guy on Slashdot with a 56k is the guy that started it :) In (not necessarily soviet) Russia we have a saying that can be roughly translated as 'The shoemaker is without shoes himself'. So very true indeed.

      I've worked for an internet company for 4 years, building web pages, maintaining servers, etc, while refusing to get internet at home at all. Not even 56K! And I was happy. Why? - Because I stare at a computer sometimes 8, sometimes many more hours a day at work, and I wouldn't want to do the same at home at any cost. Sometimes I didn't turn on my own computer for weeks at a time.

      Obviously, there were a few rather precarious moments, like when a server goes down and pages me, expecting me to ssh and fix it... I've had to go to a friends house and use his dialup for that a few times. Or even call my boss and use him as a proxy of sorts - he types what I say, and reads back to me what he sees. That was fun!

      Not until I got unemployed did I feel the need for internet at home. Ended up ordering a free dialup trial from yahoo while my DSL was being installed. I just can't live without that daily dose SPAM, /., SCO madness and a few other things. The withdrawal was too much for me. That, and also the need to send out resumes...

      --

      Jobs? Which jobs?
    6. Re:I find it odd... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, someone PLEASE mod this up! It's so freakin' funny, I choked on my spittle.

    7. Re:I find it odd... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be so quick to judge. Could have to do with the politics of the area and the "percieved penetration" of the product within the community. A friend of mine is in a neighborhood in Dallas that has SERIOUSLY high-priced real estate in Dallas (Kessler Park, lots of 30's-40's era mini-mansions, literally just 1-2 miles from downtown (and a wonderful view of the skyline), and literally across the freeway from the main Dallas post office. He and a few of his neighbors cannot get DSL. Another friend not far from there is in an enclave surrounded by apartments (albeit older, low-priced properties, but by no means a slum or "low income"). Also no DSL for the entire neighborhood (Stevens Park Village). No plans in place for SBC to upgrade the nearby CO. Cable company (Comcast) does not offer cable modems and there are no plans to offer it there soon. Both consider the "south of the Trinity river" area low-demand areas and consider it unprofitable to upgrade. For both of my buddies, they are stuck with DirecWay. Many websites refuse to cooperate (especially those requiring uploads like photo publishing) because they want a response to their commands NOW! and can't tolerate much delay. It's absurd that within a metropolitan area with such a concentrated population, no broadband alternatives exist. Grrrrr.....

    8. Re:I find it odd... by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      I'll go you one further, my boss doesn't even have a computer at home.

      No, he's not a mindless PHB, he's an engineer (I have what used to be his job before he got promoted and I got hired) that's been stuck in a PHB's role.

    9. Re:I find it odd... by PhaseChange · · Score: 1

      Personally the 'always on' aspect is more important to me than speed (which is fortunate, as I have no broadband options). I rely on the internet connection constantly for news, weather, yellow pages, recipes, etc. My solution is an old 486 running Freesco that keeps my dialup link live 24/7.

      Aside from the periodic nasty email from my ISP ("Your dialup connection is not meant to be an always on...blah, blah"), it works fine for me.

    10. Re:I find it odd... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wth? You're responsible for the upkeep of a server 24/7, you don't have internet access at home, and you got unemployed... seems like a pretty logical step.

      My boss would castrate me if I called him and told him to ssh in to repair a server "I'll walk you through it..." wouldn't fly.

      Some things you just need to do your job.

    11. Re:I find it odd... by dincubus · · Score: 1

      Hmmm taco.. grab a modem rack (cisco makes one) and then get maybe 10 56k modems, channel bond em all.. bingo instant dsl speeds. tho your ISP my hate you for doing it.

      it is a thought tho

      --
      a wise man once said "two wrongs dont make a right, but three rights do make a left" and that wise man was gallagher
    12. Re:I find it odd... by secolactico · · Score: 1

      Don't you need a similar set-up on the other end of the link? That is, another modem rack at the ISP?

      Why would the ISP hate him? He'd be paying for 10 connections instead of one... unless the ISP doesn't restrict simultaneous logins. ... yes, I realize your post was in the spirit of humor... I suck at this.

      --
      No sig
    13. Re:I find it odd... by Kethinov · · Score: 1

      One thing I find kind of funny though is Linux... I don't even know how to get 56k working in Linux because when I started using it, dhcp broadband was already saturated. Taco obviously knows how though. ;)

      --
      You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    14. Re:I find it odd... by sessyargc · · Score: 1

      I still use 56K dialup at home using a vintage 1993 Diamond Supra 56e external modem (flashed to support Kflex). I hate it when downloading mods from nwnvault, but generally I'm satisfied with the dialup. Max throughput 5Kbps! Also every 4 hours I get disconnected, ISP says its a maintenance feature :) In the Philippines fast Internet pays premium and most is only available in some areas. Tough!

      with the slow connection i get to close pop-ups/pop-unders before the ads even show :) slow...

      --
      - not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted
    15. Re:I find it odd... by Joel+Carr · · Score: 1

      Well it used to be a fun experience back in the day. I have vivid memories of wasting many dollars trying to work out why my isp wouldn't talk to this particular version of Redhat/SuSE/Mandrake... Then convincing myself I'd solved the problem only to waste another phone call finding out it was still broken. Ah memories!

      ---

      --
      Any man who can drive safely while kissing a pretty girl is simply not giving the kiss the attention it deserves. -- AE
  5. That explains by RLiegh · · Score: 5, Funny

    why he doesn't read his own site ;-)

    -anonymous 56k user

    1. Re:That explains by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      That's the funniest shit I've read on this site for ages. If I had read that thirty seconds earlier, half my keyboard and screen would be covered in Coke right now.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    2. Re:That explains by slpalmer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't you know you shouldn't admit to doing illegal... oh wait... that Coke... :-)

      Stephen L. Palmer
      SLP - Technical Consulting

    3. Re:That explains by Hannes+Eriksson · · Score: 1

      Coca Cola or Pepsi? The guaranty might be voided with the wrong beverage. Which one depends on the manufacturers preference.

      --
      Geek rants since like... 2000 or something.
    4. Re:That explains by Wog · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, I even tried sniffing coke once.

      Pity, though, the ice cubes kept getting stuck up my nose.

    5. Re:That explains by 870Fragmaster · · Score: 1

      You do know that you can set up your personal slashdot to text only? Im on a lan and I still prefer text only.

    6. Re:That explains by Zardus · · Score: 5, Funny

      You know, I actually used to sell Coke illegally at my school....

      What I mean is this: Back in Junior year of high school, my school signed an exclusive contract with Pepsi and outlawed sale of Coka Cola on campus. Almost instantly, me and a few friends seized the opportunity to make some money and started selling Coke to fellow students at a lower price than the school itself sold its Pepsi.

      It went well for a few weeks, then rival gangs rose up and soon the school was torn in a Mafia-style Coka Cola peddling war. After a while, our "family" and the other guys' "family" were the only two left, and they decided to turn the heat up and set up shop in plain sight. It started a frenzy, got them shut down by the authorities within a day, and left us as the only ones to reap in the profits.

      The result of all that (other than a bit of spare change) has been being able to say "You know, I used to see Coke illegally at my school..." to people and see their reaction.

      --
      You can mod your friends, you can mod your nose, but you can't mod your friend's nose.
    7. Re:That explains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From such humble roots grows the tree of enterprise and democracy. By the time everybody gets to voting age they've seen their rights/choices eroded and yet get brainwashed that they are in the land of the free. No wonder they don't give shit when the DOJ splits their cheeks for Microsoft. No wonder Bush can go hunt for WMD with no proof. No wonder Bush can hold power on a rigged election.

    8. Re:That explains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At my school there was a similar thing with Ruger and we made a shitload selling Smith & Wessons behind the gym.

    9. Re:That explains by slpalmer · · Score: 1

      Did you grow up in Killeen perchance?

  6. Weather related problems.. by JayPee · · Score: 3, Informative

    The only thing I would be worried about is if weather affected it as it does Direct TV.

    Everyone I know with Direct TV is basically screwed when any amount of rain or snow is falling.

    1. Re:Weather related problems.. by spronk · · Score: 5, Informative

      It takes MASSIVE amounts of rain or snow to interrupt a DirecTV singal to the point where it's unwatchable. In all of 2003 I think I've had maybe 3 times where I had and outage and then only for a matter of minutes. Overall it's far more reliable than my old Timer Warner cable was.

    2. Re:Weather related problems.. by tbase · · Score: 4, Informative

      I used to have rain fade problems until I took the time to get my dish pointed properly, and got it out of the direct path of raindrops. For some reason, it seems that keeping rain directly off the dish seems to help. I live in Florida, and I rarely loose it even in the rainy season during torrential downpours.

      --

      666-607: 6th floor apartment of the beast
    3. Re:Weather related problems.. by SillySnake · · Score: 3, Informative

      I work at Sears where we sell Dish. As far as weather related problems, we usually only run into them in the kind of storms where you wouldn't want to have your machines on most likely anyway. Im not 100% sure about Direct, but I would imagine that installation is free, they tend to want you to get their product and like it without having to go through the hassles that would initially create a hostile relationship. With that said, I had a friend that had Sat. internet a couple years ago, and while I'm not sure who was hosting his $80/month service, it was extremely fast for doing your average web browsing and downloading.

    4. Re:Weather related problems.. by midifarm · · Score: 4, Informative
      OK, I live in Minneapolis, which gets an ample amount of bad weather (lots of snow and rain) and I can truly say that I have only had a disruption in service twice. These said instances were during VERY bad storms. So the rhetoric spread by the failing cable companies is totally false, besides NFL Sunday Ticket is the greatest thing! I would just think the 56K upload speed (I'm assuming this is rate) would drive me crazy.

      Peace

    5. Re:Weather related problems.. by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      The only time I had Direct TV go out was during an ice storm that literally encased the dish in ice & snow and during a really heavy thunderstorm.

      Any "fact" that Time Warner repeatably points out via cable advertising should be taken in context. (ie Direct TV costs like 40% less than TWC)

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    6. Re:Weather related problems.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We had directTV for a while, at first it had sucked, but after two years they had improved their service during bad weather...the only problem was i had to get out on the roof and shovel the snow away when we (often) got alot

    7. Re:Weather related problems.. by jandrese · · Score: 1

      You might want to try one of the other satellites, or double checking how accurately you pointed the dish. I was one of the first people to get DirecTV, and I think it's gone out due to weather maybe a dozen times since I've had it (in West Virginia). It's probably harder to get a good signal in someplace like the Northwest Territories (more atmosphere to go through), but I think you should be able to get a good signal if you take your time and aim the dish correctly. Also, avoid pointing at satellites behind trees/mountains/homes, as the high frequencies used by DirectTV tend to be line of sight only.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    8. Re:Weather related problems.. by stripes · · Score: 2, Informative
      The only thing I would be worried about is if weather affected it as it does Direct TV.

      I'm sure it is, it sends using roughly the same frequencies (so roughly the same problems with water absorption), to satellites in roughly the same place (so about the same angle, so about the same amount of weather and trees to punch a signal through).

      About the only difference is TCP/IP will do retries and DTV broadcasts are limited to doing forward error correction ('tho with the latencies involved I hope they also FEC the IP traffic).

      Everyone I know with Direct TV is basically screwed when any amount of rain or snow is falling.

      I have had DTV for about 3 years (in two different houses). I have only had a (noticeable) signal loss from rain twice (I think), and I've had more signal loss from snow it seems to be only very short periods of time (I don't lose an hour show, I have 5 seconds of screwed up video and the audio is OK...or maybe I lose video for two minutes and audio for 90 seconds). Maybe your friends have crappie installs, or maybe the east coast (where I am) has a better line on the satellites then wherever your friends are. (my DTV outages definitely haven't added up in length to a single outage from my cable TV provider)

      All that said, I'm on dialup because I can't get cable IP service, DSL, or (apparently!) even ISDN here. There seems to be hills, trees, or mountains between myself and every wireless provider in the area (I'm about six miles south of Point of Rocks in VA). I have been holding out for something other then IP service from DTV. Maybe EV-DO will come out here soon. Maybe.

      My reading of the fine print from DTV is if you buy their service you are not canceling for 3 years, not unless you want to pony up at least $700 or so in fees. That kind of lock in doesn't make me eager to try. The service might be really bad (either in general, or for my usage patterns) and the $700 fee seems pretty painful...

    9. Re:Weather related problems.. by Rostin · · Score: 1

      Yes, it does take pretty inclement weather to truly block the signal. But if it gets very cold in your area when it rains or snows, ice can form in the dish, and that will ruin your party.

    10. Re:Weather related problems.. by Foofoobar · · Score: 1

      Um... I live in Seattle, the land of perpetual rain, and I don't have problems with the satellite connection ever. I once did but got up on the roof, readjusted the dish and it has worked great ever since.

      Even when it snowed up here I didn't have a single problems.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    11. Re:Weather related problems.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think this must be a myth. I've had DirectTV for about 2 years and I could count the number of weather-related outages on one hand. Most only lasted a couple of minutes with one lasting about a half-hour. On the other hand, Charter Communications--which formerly supplied my cable TV service and which presently supplies my cable-modem service would go out at least 3 times a year--often for the entire evening. I'm in central Massachusetts, so I suppose YMMV depending on where you are.

    12. Re:Weather related problems.. by pimpybra · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      "As far as weather related problems, we usually only run into them in the kind of storms where you wouldn't want to have your machines on most likely anyway." Pansy. Run that shit 24/7 or get the fuck out.

    13. Re:Weather related problems.. by pyros · · Score: 1

      I have the exact opposite anecdotes, so don't treat you personal experience as the ultimate truth of the matter. I didn't even have an individual dish. My apartment complex had this retarded setup where SBC resold DirecTV. I'm not sure how they got the signal to the complex, some big antenna I think, but it was coax from the complex endpoint to my apartment. It would be out for 30 minutes when we hadn't even seen it rain yet. This is in the Austin, Tx, metro area.

    14. Re:Weather related problems.. by Unknown+Kadath · · Score: 1

      My parents live out in the boonies of New England and have satellite internet (not DirecWay.) Latency problems, already pretty noticeable (those damn' radio waves sure drag their feet getting out and back), get worse with bad weather, and forget about connecting to anything in heavy rain or snow, especially if snow accumulates in the dish. I imagine the snow thing could be a problem for Taco out there in Michigan.

      Other posters don't seem to have problems with DirecTV and weather, so maybe it's just my parents' service. Taco, if you're going to go with it, make sure the dish is somewhere you can reach it with a broomhandle or something to knock some of the snow and icicles off (and preferably make sure you have several children to send out to do it for you.)

      Also, birds built a nest in the neighbors' dish. Don't know if it affected their service, though.

      -Carolyn

      --
      Like Daddy always said: if you can't dazzle 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with bullshit.
    15. Re:Weather related problems.. by jridley · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Then there's something wrong with the system. This is not typical. I have Dish Network and see outages only when there is a terrifically bad thunderstorm going on. As grandparent says, way less outage than cable.

    16. Re:Weather related problems.. by xjosh · · Score: 1

      Everyone you know can't point a dish. Rain fade is rare if you get a good shot at the bird. Virtually non-existent if you use a 24" or bigger dish.

    17. Re:Weather related problems.. by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Pansy. Run that shit 24/7 or get the fuck out.

      Despite the flaming tone, Mr. Pimp is right. Certainly /. editor isn't the most important job in the world, but there are situations when you absolutely need to get on the Internet for some reason (usually job). If the connection is down (which it seems satellite often is), not only are YOU SOL, but so is everyone else who depends on the work you are doing.

      If that work is teleradiology (just one example), there's some dude with a broken neck waiting in an E.R. somewhere, getting antsy & wanting to move around because he "feels okay."

    18. Re:Weather related problems.. by malfunct · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Turns out that the downloads aren't beaten on too badly by bad weather though the weather affects internet more than it does TV. The bigger problem is uploads (if you get the two-way version) since they are transmitted with far lower power. From everything I've read, get the version that does uploads over the phone instead of over the satellite, its far less prone to breaking down.

      --

      "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

    19. Re:Weather related problems.. by Naatach · · Score: 1

      Make sure you position your receiver in a location that sees less snow. I had a client outside of Flint, MI that had DirecWay. During a moderate snow storm, the connection took a shit. We went out and broomed off the dish and we were up and running again.

      --
      There may be no "I" in team, but there's also no "F" in way.
    20. Re:Weather related problems.. by Night+Goat · · Score: 1

      That wasn't the case with my satellite when I had the Dish network in Vermont. Mostly any time it rained more than just sprinkling, we couldn't watch TV due to the signal not coming through. Satellite internet was that way too, but even on semi-decent days, it was crap. Most days it was no better than a dial-up modem. In fact, I'd prefer a modem because that way you don't have to worry about the connection crapping out in the middle of something important.

    21. Re:Weather related problems.. by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      So far I have had fewer instances of lost service (0) with Dish Network that I previously had with Cox (2) during bad weather.

      Yes, my cable service would go out in really bad storms.

      I use DSL so can't comment on the internet service of Dish Network. Cox's internet service sucked.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    22. Re:Weather related problems.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, all it takes is one commercial aircraft flying overhead to jinx up your signal. So beware satellite internet if you're in the landing pattern of a major airport.

      Of course, if you're in the landing pattern of a major airport, chances are you have some other kind of broadband internet access already.

    23. Re:Weather related problems.. by eah · · Score: 1

      How did you get it out of the path of the rain? I live in Florida, too, and the only place I can find that stays dry during a good storm is inside. And that's assuming the roof doesn't leak. ;)

      (I'm a happy Dish Network customer, but we have had a few more outages than I would have expected in the last 9 months or so.)

    24. Re:Weather related problems.. by cabingirl · · Score: 1
      Very true. Ever since Comcast took over AT&T broadband, we have been bombarded with "the dish sucks" commercials. And if you pay attention, the problems the users have are caused by them being total dumbasses.

      "Had to cut down a tree to watch TV" - You have to have a clear view of the southern sky, as it says *in the literature*

      "The dish kept blowing over" - It needs to be bolted to something sturdy, like the balcony railing clearly shown in the commercial.

      Then there's the guy who had to set up an elaborate mirror system to see if the TV was on, yet his wife and kids are in the commercial. They couldn't just yell up the damned stairs?

      Bah.

      --
      I could kill you, sure, but I could only make you cry with these words
    25. Re:Weather related problems.. by raoulduke1212 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what is meant by MASSIVE, but here in Chicago a moderate drizzle will hose DirecTV to the point where all I get is the "Searching for Signal" message. I don't live in a glass canyon, and my dish has a nice clear view of the southern sky... Snow will do it as well, of course, and I've noticed that even light precip. will cause artifacts on the video and those horrifying chirps on the audio. I'd be wary if looking at any ISP that relies on satellite tech.

    26. Re:Weather related problems.. by sunking2 · · Score: 1

      Not really, the more north you are the lower you have to point your dish. Mine is at like 30 deg in Mass, so for the most part everything just runs off it, even snow and sleet. I've had my dish for going on 2 years and have never had ice forming on it be a problem. Granted, N.E. certainly isn't the worst for weather compared to other regions, but I think it's a pretty good test. It's much more common for it to go out due to torential rains as opposed to winter weather, and even then it's only for a few minutes and maybe a half dozen times in the past 2 years.

    27. Re:Weather related problems.. by wworf · · Score: 1

      but there are situations when you absolutely need to get on the Internet for some reason (usually job)

      I would tend to think that if your job is that important, you wouldn't rely on only one type of network connection. Having a single point of failure is just asking for trouble.

    28. Re:Weather related problems.. by Forge · · Score: 1

      We don't get snow (Tropical Island == No snow, ever).

      All our cable providers are located close to the clients (Within a few miles). That means that Heavy rain which affects satellite will affect the cable in the same way. More importantly there is the additional wire vulnerability.

      --
      --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
    29. Re:Weather related problems.. by Secrity · · Score: 1

      I have never heard of "NFL Sunday Ticket" and the jargon dictionary does not list "NFL" Is it an off-peak pricing program or does it give you better speed or shorten the latency on Sundays?

    30. Re:Weather related problems.. by tbase · · Score: 1

      Right now it's about 3 feet below a 1.5 foot overhang of our roof. It's just enough so it still gets wet, but no direct rain. Another thing that helped was when I upgraded to a larger dish. Even if you don't use HDTV, the bigger dish seems to pull in a better signal.

      --

      666-607: 6th floor apartment of the beast
    31. Re:Weather related problems.. by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      The funniest part, at least with Time Warner, is their employees (depicted as both saintly and helpful) go to great lengths to avoid telling you how much their services actually cost.

      The only written documentation of TW pricing policies (at least in upstate NY) is in these 15 page legalese document required by the state.

      You'll hear about a "free" digital upgrade (for 6 months) or a $5/mo DVR (for 3 months)... but the actual prices are not on their websites and the telesales person will only quote it when asked.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    32. Re:Weather related problems.. by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      Probably not. Video data has a small lifetime where it's useful, but computer data, if its 3ms late, still useful. Plus, any lost packets are resent, at least for TCP (hell, they might even have retransmission at layer 2, for all I know).

      It will still affect it, mind you. But it will be lag, rather than missing the last 3 seconds of the superbowl's last touchdown.

    33. Re:Weather related problems.. by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      I have DIrect TV and there are no problems so far...it has Snowed a lot and have had lots or rain, not to mention my signal is already a bit low because I am slightly blocked by aome branches in my neighbor's yard.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    34. Re:Weather related problems.. by pyros · · Score: 1

      My point was that you can't accurately make that claim for the entire network, only for certain localities. For me, I've found regular cable more reliable. I also lived in MN for a while, and people I knew there found cable more reliable than satellite. I know that the installation I had was bad, but that's my point. You might have crappy cable infrastructure. Who knows, who cares? We each have the choice available and use whichever meets our needs best. ;)

    35. Re:Weather related problems.. by Eil · · Score: 1


      I would just think the 56K upload speed (I'm assuming this is rate) would drive me crazy.

      33.6k, actually. Modems advertised at 56k (53k legal max) really only go that fast downstream due to the nature of the telephone system. That is, unless, they've made some kind of vast improvements in modem and telephone technology in the last 5 years that I haven't yet heard of.

    36. Re:Weather related problems.. by workindev · · Score: 1

      Its not the rain or the snow that affects the signal, its the height of the storm clouds that may get in the way of the signal.

    37. Re:Weather related problems.. by dcm1101 · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... I've had rain fade on a 5.6 meter dish that was thoroughly peaked and nulled. I could literally look outside at a big, fat cloud moving across the sky and then look inside at my spectrum monitor and watch everything on the satellite drop 10dB in a matter of seconds. If there is enough water in the path, a Ku signal will die, and there's nothing to be done except wait for the weather to improve.

    38. Re:Weather related problems.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had direcTV (TV only, no 'net) for about 6 years now. I started in NY (1 hr North of NYC), and only had problems with truly torrential rain. And even then, it was never when the rain was actually falling on me, but rather when it was approaching (storms there usually approach from the South-West, the same direction the sattelite was). I never had any problems with snow.

      I've since moved to New Hampshire. The new location resulted in a bit more down tilt to the dish. I now have more problems with rain, with the same pattern; it usually affects me only when the rain is approaching, but not as much when overhead. Now, however mearly a heavy downpour will wipe out the signal.

      I have only had a problem with snow twice. Once during a near white-out condition, and another time when the dish was actually 80% buried with snow (over 2' on the roof!).

      I think I average abouth 4 or 5 signal losses a year.

      It seems from my two measely data points, weather affects the reception more the further north you get, because there's actually more precipitation between your dish and the satellite.

    39. Re:Weather related problems.. by midifarm · · Score: 1
      I don't know if you're trying to be funny or not, but I'll play along assuming you're from outside the US. The NFL is the National Football League and 90% of all games are on Sundays, the other 10% are Monday nights and various playoff games and the Thanksgiving games. Anyway what this service does is provide you with EVERY game available. It allows you to pick up games you'd like to see even if you don't live in the area. They have similar services for basketball, hockey, etc. including various worldwide soccer leagues. It's just very handy to be able to switch from game to game as you please when usually when your "home" team is playing that's the only one broadcast in your area. It also makes picture in picture very useful!

      Peace

    40. Re:Weather related problems.. by gb506 · · Score: 1

      I have both DirecTV and Comcast Digital Cable. The DirecTV signal may be affected by weather once or twice during a typical summer (I've had it since 1997), and only when there is a torrential downpour.

      On the other hand, my Comcast Digital Cable goes out for short periods at least once every two weeks. And besides that, even though I have ancient DirecTV receivers, the Comcast Digital Cable picture is vastly inferior to DirecTV.

      The cable company advertising RE bad sat reception is bunk.

      Oh, yeah, there's the Sunday Ticket on DirecTV. Even if the darn thing worked only 50% of the time, I'd still have it for this reason alone.

    41. Re:Weather related problems.. by sjvn · · Score: 1

      It also takes massive bad weather to knock out DirecWay. You'll see a lot more bandwidth trouble because of 'overuse' than you ever will because of weather.

      Latency, as many other people have commented, is satellite's real pain in the rump though. That said, if your only other choice is dial-up, the satellite is easily the better choice.

      Steven

    42. Re:Weather related problems.. by blackbear · · Score: 1

      During the last big hurricane that went through central Virginia and up the east coast (forgot the name.) Not only did my wife and I keep power (thanks to burried power lines.) but we watched the whole show on DirecTV. We lost signal for maybe five minutes during the entire event.

    43. Re:Weather related problems.. by LinuxHam · · Score: 1

      I don't get all these cable outages people are experiencing. I had to wait 6 years to get a cable modem after my first friend got his because my town's cable infrastructure was decades old. Yet my cable tv never goes out. Granted, once Comcast moved in I saw trucks all around town for months pulling new cable, so it had *better* not go out now! OTOH, whenever people ask me about dish systems, I give them the fair warning, "just keep in mind that the dish only goes out when you need it most."

      True stories: I was in a hotel room near the office data center on emergency duty for Hurricane Floyd. I had the tv on, my police scanner and a Nextel with multiple executives a button press away. Sure enough, as the eye of the storm came up through Hudson Bay, the dish servicing the hotel went out. I was stuck with the scanner for the rest of the night.

      Then, last July 4th, I was visiting Mom in Orlando, when the typical afternoon thunderstorms actually kicked up a couple of tornados in the area. They broke in on the local tv channels and were putting up "Super Doppler 9" or whatever they call it there, and started to drill down to show the current position and track of the tornado. They kept drilling down closer and closer to our neighborhood when I heard, and an exact quote here, "there is a tornado on the ground! I repeat a tornado on the ground in our viewing area! It has been on the ground for about 15 minutes now and it is heading directly for" ssssshhhhhhhhhhhh.... "SEARCHING FOR SATELLITE SIGNAL".

      "You gotta be shittin' me."

      So, yes cable has been much better for me during the times I've needed it the most. Blizzard of '96? 39 inches of snow. Perfect. My friend's dish? Out to lunch. Even thick clouds knock it out. Rarely, but they do.

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
    44. Re:Weather related problems.. by Carnivore · · Score: 1

      I lived in an apartment complex in Florida with a similar setup. It also went out pretty frequently when there was no/minor inclement weather near us.

    45. Re:Weather related problems.. by jridley · · Score: 1

      Yes, but in the case of satellite, you can control it. You can get the repair guy out, or fix it yourself. (unless it's provided by the landlord as in your case; most people have their own satellite systems).

      If you have bad cable, you're probably just screwed. When I had cable, it was horrible and they didn't give a damn, because you had no other company to go to.

    46. Re:Weather related problems.. by jridley · · Score: 1

      Well shit man, in Hudson bay you're practically skimming the horizon to see a geosync satellite. You're looking through a hundred miles of mud.

      I have Dish Network at 42* north, and I lose signal maybe 10 minutes a year.

      When I had cable, sometimes a whole dish (5 or 10 channels) would go out Friday night, and the cable operator didn't give enough of a shit to bother resetting the receivers until Monday morning.

      I have Cable internet now, and the company is much better run, but from talking to my neighbors that there are still outages that can last 20 or 30 minutes, several times a year. Still way worse than Dish.

      Also, Dish is cheaper (even with paying the extra $10 for broadband without cable TV) and the picture quality is better. All in all, I don't know why anyone would use cable for TV. But they are a good choice for cheap broadband. I'm getting 2Mbps down/256K up for $30+$10 a month. Hard to beat.

    47. Re:Weather related problems.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oops.. poor geography on my part.. I was in Newark, NJ at the time, so the hurricane was entering NY Harbor at the bottom of the Hudson *River*, not the Hudson Bay.. about 400 miles to the south :)

      In any case, not to say cable never goes out, just not mine. Sorry 'bout the confusion.

    48. Re:Weather related problems.. by borg007 · · Score: 1

      I live in Poland, Maine and fog and lightningn seem to be the only thing that bothers it. Since, I unplug everything during a lightning storm any way, it really isn't a problem. Strange though, the Internet signal holds up better than the TV signal in inclimate weather. I went with this system because Adelphia went broke and the local mini-Tel was years away from providing DSL. Yeah, you can't play twitch-based games on-line, but if you need that MOVE TO A CITY!

    49. Re:Weather related problems.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, where i live (Toronto, Canada) Cable is far from dead, in fact, its quite the mainstream. I don't see our cable services dying anytime soon.

    50. Re:Weather related problems.. by op00to · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you can't play twitch-based games on-line, but if you need that MOVE TO A CITY!

      This is the most intelligent thing that I've ever read on /. concerning rural broadband access. I don't understand the feeling of entitlement (this happens primarily in North America) to recieving city services in the middle of nowhere. Wah, I want broadband, but I decided to move to a huge mcmansion built on some farm way outside the city! Wah, I was lured out here by cheap taxes, but I don't get as much as when I was in the city! Why don't I have all the nifty city services!

      I'll tell you why: you're in the middle of nowhere. Concentations of civilization have always had better services than the outlying areas. This has been the case since the first civilizations. Guess what: it's not going to change.

      If you really want broadband (or sewers, or electricity), you'll get it by rolling your own solution, paying the big bucks to some corporation or whoever, or by moving your ass back to civilization.

    51. Re:Weather related problems.. by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      I live in Florida, and I rarely loose it even in the rainy season during torrential downpours.

      WOW...
      Now that's a testiment if I've ever heard one. I used to live in St. Petersburg, FL and those storms you guys get down there in Florida are violent. If it stands up to that, I'd say it's pretty good.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    52. Re:Weather related problems.. by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      Take my word for it: Your reception with DSS in the middle of a tropical storm is far superior than your reception with cable when the idiot down the street decided not to call Miss Utility.

    53. Re:Weather related problems.. by FuegoFuerte · · Score: 1

      Um... I live in Seattle, the land of perpetual rain, and I don't have problems with the satellite connection ever. I once did but got up on the roof, readjusted the dish and it has worked great ever since. Even when it snowed up here I didn't have a single problems.

      Dude, we may live in the land of *perpetual* rain, but compared to other places it's almost always a very *light* rain. If you've ever travelled much, say to Florida or Texas or any of the midwest states, you'll realize we actually have very tame weather. Wet all the time, yes but it's really not that much of a downpour. The heaviest storms I remember (Inauguration day storm, etc) are barely more than the average rainstorm in places like Florida. We just freak more cause we see it less.

      It's about the same thing with our snow. Our last snowstorm, much as it messed up the roads and sent drivers sliding all over, wasn't really that bad. The only "severe" part of that whole storm was the ice at the end, which I'm sure could muck up a dish in no time.

    54. Re:Weather related problems.. by tbase · · Score: 1

      Yeah I know- when I first had it, it would go out every time it rained. I'm surprised they don't advise people to provide the dish some sort of shelter, but I guess if they did they'd be admitting it's a problem.

      --

      666-607: 6th floor apartment of the beast
    55. Re:Weather related problems.. by Foofoobar · · Score: 1

      You'll also notice in places like the Midwest and Texas, the rain almost ALWAYS come with lightning which has a far greater impact than rain. So saying it is rain is not entirely accurate unless you can somehow test without lightning.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    56. Re:Weather related problems.. by neilio · · Score: 1

      >It takes MASSIVE amounts of rain or snow
      true, but it only takes a 30mph wind hitting it to make it useless ; )

      In my hood this happens very rarely.

      >Overall it's far more reliable than my old Timer Warner cable was.

      Definitely!!!

      l8,
      AC
      Direct TV customer

  7. Got a T1 line to your house! by Bombcar · · Score: 0

    "Always double-clickin' on my mizzouse"

    It might not be that expensive to drop a real T1.

    1. Re:Got a T1 line to your house! by deadhead80 · · Score: 1

      I wonder how many people can place that line?

      --
      Deadhead
    2. Re:Got a T1 line to your house! by blugu64 · · Score: 1

      Weird Al - "It's all about the Pentiums"

      weird...cause I'm a mac guy.....cool song though

      --
      "Personal ownership is a hallmark of conservative capitalism. And I don't believe I am entitled to anything that I did n
  8. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  9. DW6000 and Router/Firewall Problems by Eyah....TIMMY · · Score: 5, Informative

    The main problem I found was installing a linksys router I had behind the DW6000.

    The DW modem acts as a outer/firewall too. It will assign IPs and the only thing you need is a switch to connect multiple computers to it.

    The problem is you can't really configure the modem/router. So you can't disable the router feature for example. If you want that kind of control, you'll need the pro version which is quite pricy (although it gives you a static IP).

    Here's a forum I found that addresses the DW6000 and linksys router problems.

    --

    It is not enough to have a good mind. The main thing is to use it well. - Rene Descartes (1637)
    1. Re:DW6000 and Router/Firewall Problems by Otto · · Score: 4, Informative

      Why would it matter?

      The Linksys "router" is basically just a NAT box. Connect the DW6000 to the WAN port. The Linksys would get an IP from the DW6000 box via DHCP, then do NAT services to anything on it's LAN side. Shouldn't be any strange configuration to it whatsoever.

      I've used Linksys boxes to connect stuff similar to this before, and don't think it would really be a problem if you know what the box is actually doing.. I guess you could set the thing up in router mode if you wanted, but it really shouldn't be necessary.

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    2. Re:DW6000 and Router/Firewall Problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The DW6000 was one of Korgs finest wavetable synthesisers with nice digital filters and... ..er....hold on , I'll get my coat.

    3. Re:DW6000 and Router/Firewall Problems by Eyah....TIMMY · · Score: 1

      In theory, it is really easy. Then I tried it and found there were problems.
      There are many advantages to having control of your router ( passwords, enforce PC firewall, MAC filtering, etc).
      I just regret there is no choice to disable the router feature of the DW6000.

      --

      It is not enough to have a good mind. The main thing is to use it well. - Rene Descartes (1637)
  10. SSH over satellite by sterno · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm not familiar with DirecWay service, but I have done quite a bit of remote work using SSH over satellite. It's rather painful, but it is usable. I usually get about 1/2 second of latency and it is irritating, but you can still get stuff done if you have to.

    If you're expecting to do hours upon hours of work this way though, I imagine it will drive you nuts.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
    1. Re:SSH over satellite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      hours upon hours of work this way though, I imagine it will drive you nuts

      Alright. One more time. He is the editor of Slashdot ;)

    2. Re:SSH over satellite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      compared to 56kbps download speeds, even 500ms latency might be an improvement.

      My boy in South Bend Indiana loves it. He has like a 3Mbps deal going. Can't play games on it, but set your MTU as high as is efficient and you get pretty decent download speeds.

      When it gets windy, or there is snow sitting on the dish, it doesn't work so good. I guess you could build a windsheild to minimize this. I get good TV during the worst rain or snow, as long as the wind is screwing with the azimuth.

    3. Re:SSH over satellite by dimitri_k · · Score: 1

      You might want to check out udpeq , if you have root on a well connected machine somewhere else. You can use it to combine the bandwidth of several connections.

      --
      sig is
    4. Re:SSH over satellite by TwistedGreen · · Score: 1

      local echo?

    5. Re:SSH over satellite by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      You really don't understand what latency is, do you?

    6. Re:SSH over satellite by TomRushworth · · Score: 5, Informative
      I've used DirecWay for several years now.

      Re: weather problems - I've only had a couple of hours worth of outages in the whole time, I wouldn't consider it an issue. If you live in a snow zone though, make sure you can reach the dish easily with something to clean off excess snow. A dusting doesn't hurt, but a foot of snow on the arm pretty much kills the signal :).

      Re: SSH and interactive delay - extended interactive work _will_ drive you nuts. The technical term for the experience is "wait and see, squared" :). SSH works just fine for file copies, BK/CVS, tunnels etc., as long as any typing you do is local. I use direct ssh only to set up something less interactive.

      My original installation was with a Win2K box and was useless for networking, as any large file that went through "internet connection sharing" got dropped part way though. I switched to a Helius Satellite Router and have been happy with it ever since.

      Overall I'm quite pleased with it. I'll never see cable or DSL, and dialup is long distance, so this is the only viable alternative for real network access, but I'd choose it over dialup even if dialup were completely free.

    7. Re:SSH over satellite by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      well...hopefully, 802.16 will come out your way, allowing you to set up a reciever for your home and have broadband goodness.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    8. Re:SSH over satellite by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

      More like 'shell script'. I'd make one-letter abbreviations for all your usual commands on the remote host, and keep a cheat-sheet on the wall. Also, if you find yourself doing something more than once, you ought to script it to save the agony. Overall it's less flexible but more convenient, and you can see what you're doing.

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    9. Re:SSH over satellite by dimitri_k · · Score: 1

      You really don't understand what latency is, do you?

      I do, simpleton.

      A benefit of the app I linked to is getting around satellite latency by pooling modem connections in with it. Modem connections do not suffer from the same latency problems.

      --
      sig is
    10. Re:SSH over satellite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ssh? that's your problem, too much overhead. i recommend upgrading to rsh

    11. Re:SSH over satellite by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Err, no... you did not provide a link to "get around satellite latency". You provided a link to not use satellite *at all*. There's no way to avoid satellite latency short of not using it (for up- OR downstream), due to the (rather unbreakable) laws of relativity.

    12. Re:SSH over satellite by dimitri_k · · Score: 1

      The point of udpeq is to equalize over several connections, allowing you to benefit from the bandwidth of a satellite connection and the low latency of a modem connection.

      --
      sig is
    13. Re:SSH over satellite by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Which doesn't solve the satellite latency problem. The modem is great for sending out the request. Yup, it definitely fixes the problem of outgoing latency. However, if the satellite is used for the downlink side, the responses will still suffer from the latency induced by said link. Thus, this system will still be useless for, say, online gaming.

      Now, if you use the modem for up *and* downstream communication (for low-bandwidth tasks), you're absolutely correct, the latency problem is solved. But only because you've bypassed the satellite entirely. The minute the satellite downlink enters the picture, the total roundtrip latency increases significantly (by as much as 500ms, according to some reports).

    14. Re:SSH over satellite by dimitri_k · · Score: 1

      udpeq attempts to solve exactly the latency problem. I've never used it, so I don't know how well it works, but the scheme seems to be this: you have a machine with a fast connection that uses UDP to balance traffic to and from the machine with several connections using UDP streams that get reconstituted on the end box.

      You don't use one connection for one purpose. You use all connections for all purposes. Thus you use modem connections to dilute the high latency of the satellite connection toward the relatively lower latency of the modem connections.

      I'm not sure how many low quality connections you would need to make online gaming enjoyable under this sort of scheme, but SSH should be usable with a modem or two. I'm not saying this isn't expensive. In addition to the satellite you need a dedicated phone line or two, plus an IP on a friend's machine with true broadband, but for people who live in remote areas, this is a workable solution till they get WiFi.

      --
      sig is
  11. Is this a two way system? by Fnkmaster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It sounds from their site like the DirecWay is a two-way system. While in theory that might sound more convenient than the older downstream-only satellite systems that used 56k dial-up for upstream, I'd imagine the latency would be substantially worse, with two satellite hops in the round-trip. Is this the case in practice? Honestly, how much upstream bandwidth do you really need for casual use, given that you aren't going to be doing any serving or gaming on a sat link anyway? Is the subjective experience better or worse with this system?

    1. Re:Is this a two way system? by GigsVT · · Score: 5, Informative

      It doesn't matter, the upstream to the satellite isn't much faster than dial-up.

      Only benefit it not paying for another phone line.

      I have starband, I use a regular dial-in modem in addition to it. Dial-in modem is the default route on my box, and I set up proxies to a proxy server connected to the satellite for web and ftp downloads.

      That way I can ssh out without horrible latency, but still download at the faster satellite download speeds.

      To his other questions, rain fade is real. If you have a strong enough signal normally, you won't drop service unless it's really coming down outside. Installation for starband ran about $700 or so.

      Directway is slower than Starband, but if you want the OS agnostic modem, you currently have to get the small business package, which is $120 per month. Standard service still uses the 360 windows-only modem, but it's $60 per month.

      In the future, there will be robots. I mean in the future, there will be a "telecommuter" account type that will assumedly allow people to get the hardware-based 480 modem without paying so much per month.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:Is this a two way system? by Afrosheen · · Score: 5, Informative

      My brother lives out in the boonies and I'll relay what he's told me about his satellite.

      1. Latency is horrible. He gets a 1000ms ping to anywhere, so that's a 1 second delay after he clicks anything before the remote server he's hitting even gets his attention.

      2. Download caps. I think he's limited to a few gigs a month, maybe one.

      3. Bandwidth throttling. This is time dependent as in time of day also. If you download too fast during certain hours of the day (internet prime time if you will), you get throttled waaaay down to a few KB/sec for hours.

      4. Complicated software that's windows only. Everytime he calls me for tech support, I cringe. It's always an XP problem and always hard to troubleshoot. I've been wanting to get him on linux for years but with the satellite it's just not an option. He has the 2 usb boxes setup for his connection, maybe this new router would help.

      5. Awful browsing. Since the latency is so high, some servers timeout before you can get a page from them. I had him install Opera awhile back (the lightning fast caching helps alot when navigating sites on a high latency connection) and he loves it, uses it exclusively. Without Opera, surfing the web is painful.

      6. Unplayable online games. With that kind of ping, you can't play anything online, except maybe Yahoo Java Chess or something where reflexes don't count. Flash games may be playable too, not sure.

      It basically sucks for anything but leeching big files, and for that it sucks too thanks to throttling and bandwidth limits. It's hard to believe that in this day and age people in remote locations have to suffer with crap like this. Then again, bandwidth isn't a god-given right...but it should be.

    3. Re:Is this a two way system? by GigsVT · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, starband is 600ms or so standard ping, with varying amounts of packets hitting 1200 and 1800ms, because it's collision based and some packets need retries.

      There's no bandwidth limits with Starband at least. And they provide a full usenet server, with a lot of binary groups even. Once I leeched 4GB from their news server in two days, just to see if they would let me. That was when I first signed up, I don't download huge amounts anymore, just normal stuff like JVMs and Linux updates and etc.

      Anyway, they are still issuing their windows-based modem standard, but they have a hardware modem coming out, that they are playing games with, making it available only for business accounts currently. And the modem costs about $600 (even if you are upgrading), in addition to paying twice as much per month.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    4. Re:Is this a two way system? by oscarcar · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't the latencies be better managed if one ran their own DNS server, so that the DNS resolutions would be cached. DNS resolution has to do a roundtrip before your browser even asks the server for the web page.

      It speeds up my web browsing noticeably, and I'm on DSL.

    5. Re:Is this a two way system? by demachina · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think you are really overstating how bad it is. No its not DSL or cable modem but it is vastly superior to a dialup as long as you can affort it. One huge plus is there isn't a cat fight all the time over using the phone line for a phone or using it for internet. That alone was worth it assuming you cant get a second phone line cheap.

      Your complaints about the complicated windows only software is the old 4000 modem and is not relevent to the 6000 Cmdr Taco was asking about. The 6000 is a vast improvement, I wager its just Linux box but don't know for sure, and is just a DHCP gateway. The latencies can run up to 1000 ms during peak, but from my Linux box, most of the time, they are much more typicly in the 500 ms range which is about as good as you can get with the speed of light constraint. Again the 6000 helps a lot with the latency especially if you are using a shared internet connection through the Windows box with the old 4000 modem. That really does bite. UPGRADE.

      --
      @de_machina
    6. Re:Is this a two way system? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      In the future, there will be robots. I mean in the future, there will be a "telecommuter" account type that will assumedly ...


      I'm not even that interested in the subject, but this out-of-left-field humor helps justify reading this far down. Thanks .

    7. Re:Is this a two way system? by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      I guess after reading my long-winded post you completely forgot my preamble mentioning that it's my brother's connection and not mine. I'll pass on your upgrade advice though.

    8. Re:Is this a two way system? by CodeGorilla · · Score: 0

      Don't forget that Starband has teh amazing, mutating Acceptable Use Policy wherein Starband can arbitrarily throttle or disable your service when your connection becomes a strain on their overall network resources. Sounds a lot like Comcast, eh?

    9. Re:Is this a two way system? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having set up commerical satellite networks, including "DirecWay", "SpaceNet", and many others, I think I have some room to speak.

      1. 1000ms pings on any VSAT (satellite network) is expected. Bandwidth caps, etc. are expected. They are major issue's with VSAT handling ICMP (ping type, etc) traffic. In fact, it was one companies offical position that "We do _not_ support ICMP protocol on our network", I then got in a fight with one of there tech's when they tried to claim to the customer that they fully support IPv4..

      2. Weather issue's - Depends on where you are. In Canada I run into weather issue's all the time, seeing as the Direcway satellite is positioned over Texas I have to set to less then 40 degree's - many many opportunities for clouds to get in the way, and they do. So if you are in the South, you will have less weather issue's.

      3. Satellite's crash. Happened in Canada before and a lot of people lost service. Canadian Tire (200+ stores) lost their entire network in one famous crash..

      4. If an editor of an online news service, and have money to blow, and _can't_ get cable/dsl/t1 service of some kind, then yes, get satellite service, just make sure you keep your modem and phone line around for backup services. Most American retailers that use VSAT networks (and there are LOTS of them!) have a backup phone line, that they use OFTEN. My last customer had over 300 stores across the USA and on average dealt with 2-5 stores not polling A NIGHT due to satellite outage.

    10. Re:Is this a two way system? by ForestDweller · · Score: 1

      I have been a StarBand user for nearly 3?+ years now. I have nearly no other options, though community wierless is only two miles due east, I am behind a tall ridge that will require at least 100"+ tower to get a clear line of site. County Zoning can be a pain... but that is another topic, not to mention the expense...

      Over all StarBand is better than nothing, but I would LOVE to be able to play a few first person games with my brother 80 miles away. The latency prevents that, it even makes terminal services uncomfortable though workable for short tasks. But be prepared for it to take a lot longer than it would on a 'good' connection. Not good for an emergency call, with the objective to fix (whatever) fast.

      I have recently changed my 'SB gateway' box to a faster one (I think the orginal box has hardware issues-undetermined at this time, but things were getting slower and slower) The change did seem to make things seem better/more responsive. The new box is a 1 GHz, w/128Mg running win 2K server and doing ICS for our small home network (which includes Macs and one or two linux boxes). In the past six months the quality of service has seemed to improve a bit. Perhaps they moved users around on transponders to balance out resources(?).

      I have yet made the time to try what GigsVT describes, adding a dialup connect in concert with the sat link. GigsVT, would you mind expanded on your working solution? Either here for all, or directly if you feel an open discussion would be unwarranted.

      Perhaps your combo solution would work well enough and be realatively cost effective for CmdrTaco and a number of others...

    11. Re:Is this a two way system? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      The new Mission Control requires a pretty good system to run right. I used to have everything on a Pentium 200, with 80something megs of RAM, but the new MC didn't like that one bit.

      The dialup thing is pretty easy. The way I do it, for linux at least, is to hook a modem directly up to the linux box, and set the default route to be the modem, with another route to 192.168 or whatever your local net is.

      The starband proxy needs to be a different computer somewhere in your local network. In your web browser, set up the proxy setting to the starband proxy, and you can set the environment variables in your shell for http_proxy and ftp_proxy, and wget et al will use them.

      If you want to use the modem, just turn off the proxy in your browser, and it'll use the dial up. SSH and everything will use the dial up.

      There are several variations on the way you can do this, the main jist is that the default route goes to the dial-up modem, and things you want to use the satellite need to specifically set the proxy server. You could set things up so that your DHCP default route goes to the computer with dial-up, and have that be the default way to the Internet, and everything else needs to specifically use the proxy.

      The way I set it up, a computer just plugging in uses the satellite rather than dial-up, the dial-up connected computer doens't even route packets for other computers, but you could turn that on if you needed more than one system to be able to take advantage of the dual setup.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    12. Re:Is this a two way system? by snow99 · · Score: 1

      Is your brother connected directly to Directway or is he through a reseller such as Earthlink or NRTC?

      I have directway through NRTC and they throttle access as you have described.

      Can anyone let me know if access directly with Directway is better than with resellers?

    13. Re:Is this a two way system? by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure he bought service directly from Direcway. Here's the scoop on the upgrade for the unfortunate 4000 series users.

      6000 series is $442 minus $100 for return of the 4000 hardware, minus $100 to renew the direcway subscription (!!), comes out to $242. That sucks for just getting a satellite router.

  12. Does anyone use SSH or TSC over this? by JustJoking · · Score: 1

    I am also considering this. Has anyone used Terminal Services Manager or SSH over this, and is it something that you could do day-in/day-out without throwing your keyboard out the window?

    1. Re:Does anyone use SSH or TSC over this? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      is it something that you could do day-in/day-out without throwing your keyboard out the window?

      No.

      It's terrible. Maybe in an emergency, but not normally.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:Does anyone use SSH or TSC over this? by reuben04 · · Score: 1

      I have used remote desktop over it and it is nearly unusable. If you have to, you can, but expect to quadruple your time using it. Citrix is a little better over satellite, but still hard to use. You have to wait after every click, like half a second for it to actually take place. You find yourself either waiting a lot, thinking too much about how to "beat the system" or making mistakes. SSH I have used a little over satellite, and I found it to be twice as bad as dial up, but if you are a real techy, you can understand it and even start to use it. Just waiting for the command to come back to you is painful. The hardest part is that everything you do is proxied. You can find weird errors sometimes. It seems to be a transparent proxy, but any sort of vpn or remote anything is not possible (at least with the one that we tested). Good luck with support too, I have waited hours only to hear that it is broken and we are working on it. Two days later it was back up. If you can afford it, get a digital connection, you will be much happier till you get your bill :)

  13. Fair Access Policy by NinjaPablo · · Score: 5, Informative

    They have a policy which basically allows you to download at high speeds up to a point (600MB or so I think), after which you are throttled to sub-56K speeds for 18-24 hours. This was the main reason for me cancelling the service. The limit is slightly higher if you sign up for 'Commercial' service.

    --
    SmashTech - No smashing of tech involved
    1. Re:Fair Access Policy by wcdw · · Score: 1

      I had a friend who canceled his service for the exact same reason. Sounds great, right up until they throttle you...

      --
      If you're not living on the edge, you're just taking up space!
    2. Re:Fair Access Policy by lucasorion · · Score: 4, Informative

      The best way to think of the Fair Access Policy is like a bucket of water, which refills at a rate of about 5 KB a second. The bucket fills up to 169 megs (for the consumer version, 350 for the more expensive one), and if you empty the bucket in a four hour period you are penalized by being throttled down to dialup speeds for a while. What this effectively has meant for me is that I must schedule downloads of large files in chunks. I use leechget to download a 169 meg chunk in the morning, then let the bucket refill, and download another later in the early evening, then maybe schedule another one in the middle of the night - when the limit goes up to 225 megs. Web browsing is pretty comparable to dialup due to latency, not anything close to when I had cable (didn't want to switch, but had to move). The best part is the download speeds, which usually equal or exceed the speeds I was getting with cable. See here for user experiences and the best tech support you'll get with this service, and also read the FAQ here

    3. Re:Fair Access Policy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the exact reason why I quit using it after 6 months (I was on DirecPC, but they have the same "Fair Use" Policy). Also, don't forget you have to sign a 12 month contract.

      Within a 4 hour peroid you were allowed:

      169 Meg durring Peak Time
      240 Meg durring Off-Peak (I think it was 2AM-5AM)

      So I hope you dont plan on downloading any big files without a D/L manager program. The Desert Combat Mod for Battlefield 1942 comes in at a miniscule 550 Meg alone.

      If you go over your limit they basically shut you down for a peroid of 4 hours-you might as well shut it off at that point.

      They basically oversold their service and the loyal customers are paying the price for their greed. Stick to dial-up. If you need to free your phone just get a second line. Much cheaper and more reliable.

  14. That explains the dupes ;-) by mark*workfire · · Score: 1

    The topics come by so fast, that you don't have time to realize it....

    wait..... you're on a *slow* speed connection....

    Well, guess the dupes are still a mystery!!!

  15. Similarly - Mobile internet in big rigs? by back_pages · · Score: 3, Informative

    Is this the same type of setup used in tricked out semi tractors? I've had a few people (automobile accident assessors, etc.) ask me what they should get so that they may have internet access that's truly mobile. Satellite is the easy answer, but beyond that all I could say was, "Uh, figure out what truck drivers use."

    1. Re:Similarly - Mobile internet in big rigs? by tbase · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Flying J truck stops are all supposed to have 802.11b access shorty (many already do). That's probably what the trucker's are using if they aren't using cell modems. You couldn't use DirecWay for mobile use because you have to have the dish "professionally" pointed. I don't think the marine and RV antennas work for the internet access the way they do for Sat. TV.

      --

      666-607: 6th floor apartment of the beast
    2. Re:Similarly - Mobile internet in big rigs? by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Those satellite terminals you see over the cabs of about half of the big rigs in the US are made by Omnitrax, and they are no good for web browsing (one 1500 byte packet every 15 minutes or so, plus the service is pretty expensive for what you get).

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    3. Re:Similarly - Mobile internet in big rigs? by back_pages · · Score: 1
      Ah - thank you for the reply. I had wondered if they were just using wireless at truck stops or not but I didn't have any idea where to begin researching.

      The professionally pointed thing interests me as well. I admit I don't know a thing about satellites and/or dishes, but it seems to me that it would not be impossibly hard to have a self-aiming dish that could find the satellite in a matter of minutes - probably less if you had a GPS unit. This probably wouldn't allow you to swerve between lanes while playing Quake online, but I'd think you could park your rig for the night, push the "Locate Satellite" button, wait half an hour give or take, and be online.

      This is exactly what the insurance assessor was looking for. He goes into the field, parks his car for an hour at least, and takes a bunch of digital photos of a wrecked car. He wants to then return to his car and upload his report to the office, then move on to the next claim. Instead, he has to go from claim to claim and keep everything organized, then return to a hotel with internet access (common in big cities, but not so much in rural areas) and file all his reports in one shot. He also said there is some financial incentive for filing on the spot - something about making corrections, getting more information, or the turnover time between filing and getting paid.

    4. Re:Similarly - Mobile internet in big rigs? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      the system used around here(in Finland) to connect the forest work machinery(lumberjack machines? or whatever the proper english translation would be, anyways big tractors looking ) to the mill(so the system will know what kind of and what amount of trees have been cut where and when) is gsm based modems(gprs lately).

      if you don't need to transfer huge amounts of data gprs works out quite well as a 'truly mobile' solution where it's available(and here it is available everywhere). no need for antenna directing or whatnot either, or worrying about being on the move while the connection is up.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    5. Re:Similarly - Mobile internet in big rigs? by Chuqmystr · · Score: 1

      Satellite on the road? Here ya go. I thought I had previously seen one that was autotracking and in a randome, much like the TV only versions which can be used while in motion and I've installed in the past. I couldn't find that link though. Pricey stuff. I'll stick with my GSM/GPRS phone, thankyou very much.

    6. Re:Similarly - Mobile internet in big rigs? by dj.delorie · · Score: 1

      My dad works on a tugboat, and they're trying to get the company to buy them an auto-aimed sat TV dish (you don't get cable on a boat, and RF reception is spotty in the middle of the ocean). The units exist; they're $5,000 each.

    7. Re:Similarly - Mobile internet in big rigs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Direcway will not install a satellite dish on any movable residence, aside from a mobile home, why? The government needs to track an IP address with a physical adress, and that's not possible if the residence is on the move.

    8. Re:Similarly - Mobile internet in big rigs? by MidKnight · · Score: 1

      I think what they're looking for is TracNet, by a company called KVH. This is the same company that is selling mobile DirecTV systems in high-end SUV's for a few thousand dollars. Their Internet access product is currently suited for a big rig installation; from their documents, it's about $6K & works through the DirecPC satellite feed.

      They're supposed to be working on a similar version for SUV-sized vehicles. I doubt it'd be cheap, but for the application you're describing (accident assessors, etc), it'll probably be a no-brainer.

      --Mid

    9. Re:Similarly - Mobile internet in big rigs? by cft_128 · · Score: 1

      I doubt that is the reason, otherwise all of those wireless modems would be illegal. More likely has to do with the TV side of the dish rather than the data side - I know DirectTV and DISH have rules that are probably related to what TV stations you see and what TV markets you are in.

      --

      Underloved Movies and Pub Quiz: donotquestionme.org

    10. Re:Similarly - Mobile internet in big rigs? by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1
    11. Re:Similarly - Mobile internet in big rigs? by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      In my understanding, it's because of the FCC mandates about the safe installation and usage of a transciever like that.

      Basically, the FCC doesn't want it shooting everywhere, interrupting things.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  16. editor abuse by donutz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm abusing my power as Slashdot editor to ask for experiences with this (or similiar) services.

    I agree completely Taco. Notwithstanding the fact that many similar (do the research yourself) questions make their way to Ask Slashdot, at least I'd think you'd not set this to appear as a front-page story -- it would have been better (less abuse, on your part), I think, to just let it pop up only in the Ask Slashdot section.

    Oh well.

    1. Re:editor abuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh for the love of god, it's his own damn website.

    2. Re:editor abuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're so supportive of this, why are you posting anonymously?

    3. Re:editor abuse by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      You're forgetting that Taco getting engaged or one of the members of his favourite band dying is front-page news here. I swear if the guy stubbed his toe he'd post that up front too.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    4. Re:editor abuse by aiken_d · · Score: 1

      Yes, because it really drives down the immediacy and relevance of /. to have articles that aren't really news and could easily be researched on Google by someone with a shred of initiative.

      Cheers
      -b

      --
      If I wanted a sig I would have filled in that stupid box.
    5. Re:editor abuse by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      FYI, it's not his own website anymore, it's OSDN's. It's not been Taco's site for some time now. Of course, he's got a stake in it but so does every other OSDN stockholder. I don't see them all posting to the front-page though.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    6. Re:editor abuse by mark_lybarger · · Score: 1

      what are you nuts? sure the site was sold to OSDN, but in the deal IIRC, Taco, et al, maintained complete control over the site. no loss for Taco and company. so, if they want to post engagements, or personal "ask slashdots", or whatever go for it. it certainly isn't the community's site.

    7. Re:editor abuse by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      Either way, I'd rather have this than another SCO or tinfoil-hat RFID article.

    8. Re:editor abuse by tmark · · Score: 0

      Amen. Kind of makes it hard to argue that this isn't your Taco's own little vanity soapbox. But I guess the Anime/everything2/etc links already made that clear. I guess OSDN and its shareholders gives this guy a long leash because it doesn't really cost much, and they're willing to tolerate the editor's remarkable self-indulges as long as the site continues to function as a prominent Linux/GPL fanboy site. Thanks for reminding me again.

      I expect to get flamed or modded down but I'm not posting as an AC because I really believe the above.

    9. Re:editor abuse by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1

      It's not an abuse. It's relevant to the interests of some of the readers. As someone watching my revenue in Silicon Valley vanishing because of massive outsourcing, I am currently planning my exit strategy from this region to affordable country land where I can develop software with lower overhead. But I will need Internet access and the answers to Taco's questions are of great value to me.

    10. Re:editor abuse by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      If you don't think that Taco, the other editors and anyone else that works on this site is in any way answerable to someone at OSDN or OSDN's stockholders then you've got a very strange interpretation of ownership.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    11. Re:editor abuse by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      They not only own but created this website. Is it a blackmark on your life if they post something of interest to them on the front page?

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    12. Re:editor abuse by Tingler · · Score: 1

      I swear if the guy stubbed his toe he'd post that up front too.

      Twice. :)

    13. Re:editor abuse by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      That's what journals are for, isn't it? If every musician who died got his own front-page news article then this would you still be so reticent?

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    14. Re:editor abuse by tedgyz · · Score: 1

      Give me a break! Quit yer whining! The guy creates one of the greatest geek sites on planet Earth and you bitch him out because his question took up one paragraph on the front page for one day! Sheesh! Go away.

      --
      "No matter where you go, there you are." -- Buckaroo Banzai
    15. Re:editor abuse by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      If the musician owned his own website and posted it there then there would be no problem.

      There is also a well established precident and custom of owners of large widely read newspapers using the editorial sections to spout their personal beliefs, concerns, views....etc.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    16. Re:editor abuse by zbuffered · · Score: 1

      Jeez, give the guy a break!

      It's purpose wasn't entirely self-serving. Others may want to know this information as well.

      If you don't like the article, for the love of god don't comment in it.

      If /. filtered all articles that could be researched on Google, we'd have much fewer articles.

      This isn't just for him, it's for others like him. It's intended to spark debate and entertain the masses. That's what /. is about, afer all...

      --
      Synergy is your friend
    17. Re:editor abuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not flamed, not modded down, but put on ignore.

      Remarkable self-indulgences? Try ruling the world some time.

    18. Re:editor abuse by zbuffered · · Score: 1

      word.

      --
      Synergy is your friend
    19. Re:editor abuse by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Hey, this is the first Ask Slashdot in a while that Google can't answer with the "I'm Feeling Lucky" button, so cut him some slack. :)

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  17. i've had it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    I had it when i was living in tuba city, arizona. expect lag to be awful, when pages need several requests to the server to load properly, it will take a *long* time to load. once you start downloading something, that goes by quickly though. alos, since the uplink is on the east coast, if they experience bad weather, you will experience zero internet, even when it's sunny for you. useful service i guess if you want to up your max download speed, but i would definately reccommend a dialup backup service for when it craps out.

  18. Dupe this immediately, Rob by doc_traig · · Score: 0, Flamebait


    The next front-page article needs to be

    "Slashdot Editor-in-Chief is a 56k-er"

    --
    So long, michael. Don't let the door hit you...
  19. Theres no catch by emkman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The thing about satellite internet is that there is no reason to ever get it unless you have no other options. It is more expensive than DSL or cable, yet slower. And the higher latency as you mentioned. But it sounds like your kinda situation is the semi-niche market satellite internet aims at. As far as installion goes, since you already have a dish on your roof, any half-competent installer will be able to do the job in a half-hour.

    --
    Moderation Totals: Flamebait=2, Troll=1, Redundant=1, Insightful=6, Overrated=1, Underrated=1, Total=12. (not mine)
    1. Re:Theres no catch by mbrinkm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      DirecWay (Spelling?) requires a second dish.

      --
      "Don't worry about people stealing an idea. If it's original, you will have to ram it down their throats." --Howard Aike
    2. Re:Theres no catch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to know what geek in his right mind moves to a location that doesn't have at least one decent broadband option?! Granted, you might have other things in your life that are more important than Internet, like family and outside activities. BUT STILL. A good Internet connection is far more useful that simply pissing away hours reading Slashdot and playing with the latest scripting language. It's useful for getting work done, especially if you are the editor of one of the major geek sites on the Internet, and also makes a nice addition to every day life - seeing what's on TV, seeing what movies are playing at the local theater without trying to figure out what section the listings were moved to in this weeks edition of the local newspaper, looking up dictionaries, IMDB, confirming facts and making encyclopedia inquiries about things you've found on the Discovery Channel, finding recipes, doing market research for that new car you're buying, etc, etc, etc. As much waste as there is on the Internet, it's become an invaluable tool for me. I can't imagine a geek who is used to broadband going back to dialup. He doesn't even have kids, right? Do using that argument is no good.

      Hell, my parents are novices and they hate dialup.

      Must be nice not to chase the latest trends in IT begging for a better job when you have millions :) Maybe then I could get rid of my connection...

    3. Re:Theres no catch by JimPerlGuy · · Score: 1

      Depending on the type of satellite connection you get. The 2-way connection (actually beams back to the satellite) requires an FCC license to install. This is simply because you are transmitting through the air. The 1-way with dial-up return is easy for anyone to install. Either way, your up-stream speed will completely suck. When it's the only option, it's liveable. When it's not the only option, it sucks!

  20. What about the price? What about T1? by wowbagger · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What is the price of the sat service per month, exclusive of the equipment cost?

    What would the cost be of buying a dry pair from the phone company and having them terminate a T1 at your house?

    After all Rob, you could very easily write off the cost of a T1 at home as a business expense on your taxes, and worst case, I would think that even if the phone company won't terminate a data connection on it, your could route it to the cage and have it on the back end of the Slashdot router - just think, direct access to your servers from behind the firewall!

    1. Re:What about the price? What about T1? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Good luck getting said "dry pair".

      It's not like you can just call and order one up.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:What about the price? What about T1? by DAldredge · · Score: 0, Troll

      All the IRS would have to do is read /. and see that he doesn't edit the site. That would ruin his business expense right there!

    3. Re:What about the price? What about T1? by aheath · · Score: 3, Interesting
      According to the DIRECWAY FAQ"The DIRECWAY system with the DW6000 modem retails for $599.98 (includes dish, modem and standard installation), and you pay the regular service monthly rate (currently $59.99 per month)." There's an alternate payment plan of $99.99 up front followed by $99.99 per month for a 15 month contract. After 15 months the fee drops to $59.99 a month.

      The cost figures make me wonder whether a WISP might be less expensive. Sprint and AT&T Wireless have been advertising cellular based WISP service in the Boston area. I don't know if this type of service is available in the Ann Arbor area.

      Speaking of dry pairs and T1 lines, I have heard that if you can order Switched 56 or ISDN from the phone company, you can be assured of obtaining a dedicated copper pair. Once you have the copper pair, you MAY be able to switch over to ISDN service.

    4. Re:What about the price? What about T1? by RT+Alec · · Score: 5, Informative

      I am doing exactly that-- I have a cage with a T1 from the cage to my house. I am also supplying access for a local community WISP, so my costs are covered. I ran into some problems because my location is outside the LATA of the co-lo facility. So even though it is only 10 miles away, I would have to pay a very high local loop cost.

      Then I got in touch with some folks at BTN, they got me set up with a MPLS connection. It is somewhat similar to a frame relay connection, in that it is not distance sensitive. My advantage is that BTN has a connection at my co-lo, so everything fit nicely into place.

      So see if you can get a frame relay or MPLS T1, with a little research there might be a very cost effective solution. YMMV

    5. Re:What about the price? What about T1? by jridley · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You used to be able to, before DSL was invented. They were called "alarm" pairs and they cost about $15 a month. Then some wise guy figured out how to use them to transmit high speed data. The phone company found out that they were getting competition for their (horrible) high speed data services, and petitioned the FCC to let them stop providing dry pairs.

      They had no problem supplying dry pairs for cheap until they found out it was getting used to compete against them.

      I was reading Boardwatch during the few years when this all came about, and it was quite amusing to watch.

    6. Re:What about the price? What about T1? by Zen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree with the recommendations of getting a T1, especially with the apparently exorbitant setup fee's for the Direcway system. T1 initial setup fees are almost certainly in the thousands, but you will be happier in the long run. I currently have a T1 to my house from SBC (Illinois). It took about 2 months to get setup, and my company pays somewhere around $250/month for the service (it's hard to get them to give specific answers). We have a longterm consultant who lives along the coast in Mass. and it took the phone company over 2 years to get his T1 up and running. But to be fair, he lives in the boonies along the coast and they had to erect new poles just to hold his line.

      Obviously you would have to get a 'real' router to service the T1. The cheapest way I can think of is to purchase a Cisco 1600 series off of Ebay (EOL, but the IOS still supports everything a normal person needs) for about $100. You also need a T1 WIC card to install in the router, which will run you another $115 on Ebay. Now you have a fully functional non-neutered T1 router for $215 plus shipping. If you talk to your accountant and you can write off 50% of the T1 cost, it will even out and you will be much happier.

    7. Re:What about the price? What about T1? by citmanual · · Score: 1

      Here is a nifty Cringely article about just that.

      http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit2001082 3. html

    8. Re:What about the price? What about T1? by Chuqmystr · · Score: 1
      I've given much thought to Doing something simular. Get the T1 but get the neighbors to chip in and then distribute it over wifi. The bandwidth of the line purchased would be related to the number of users on it. It wouldn't work for every neighborhood due to topography, some neigbors not wanting stuff installed on their house, home owners association rules, etc but it could make for a good little community experience running a co-op of sorts like that in many a 'hood.

      In such a system I'd say that one would, and should, put up their own domain, run their own small mail server(s) and even put up a shared web server and give everyone a little webspace to play with, run your own game servers, streaming servers, etc, basicly become a mini-ISP ala co-op. It all sounds pretty neat in theory at least. Get three or four neighborhood geeks together to run it, design it, teach other users, etc, have twenty or so users on it, could be kinda fun. Personaly, in an installation like that I'd want to build out the wireless network so well that anyone under it's coverage could roam about in it truly sans wires. In other words, using nothing more than the built-in antenna of their wifi device. My ulterior motive would be to have the ability to roam about my neighborhood using an iPaq or a Clie' UX50 as a wifi internet radio. Soma FM on the go! Muwahahaaaaaa!

    9. Re:What about the price? What about T1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you say that again, but in English this time?

    10. Re:What about the price? What about T1? by RT+Alec · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but I'm not too sure of the terms myself. As I understand it, a point-to-point T1 consists of two parts-- the local loop (copper pair terminating at the ISP), and then the data charge (whatever the ISP is going to charge for hoppingg on their backbone). The local phone company will charge for the distance of the connection, the ISP will charge for the data.

      Frame relay is a little different. The end of the T1 terminates into the phone company's 'cloud', gets mixed in with oll their other data, yet routed to the ISP eventualy (gross oversimplification). MPLS has a number of advantages over frame relay (see link in my earlier post), but is still not distance sensitive. I suspect that BTN (as well as other providers) can create a MPLS loop over any distance, even from CmdrTaco's remote location to the co-lo for Slashdot. So that would eliminate the distance part of the feasibility study.

    11. Re:What about the price? What about T1? by Bagheera · · Score: 1

      When I was looking for a high speed connection to my home (hard core hobbiest) I explored ADSL (SDSL was not, and still is not, available here) IDSL (144K/sec bi-directional) cable Modem (Was great until the local Cable ISP went belly up and @Home took over making the service useless locally) Satellite, and T1.

      My final solution was a T1 through Speakeasy. It's NOT cheap. The local loop alone is around $300 a month from the Telco, with the total charges just over $700 with taxes and what have you. I've heard of people paying much less, but I've never seen it here - and I'm in a telecom intensive area. The T1 prices ranged from a low of $600 (close to the POP) a month to over $1400.

      Year old prices, but I haven't seen them drop much.

      Sat service was, on a per-meg basis, considerably more expensive, and subject to game-killing latency (I run servers), bandwidth and total data caps.

      Now, if you're living in Rural Montana, or Texas, or New Mexico, or some place else where there simply isn't any decent ISP connectivity, DSL, Cablemodem, whatever, Sat service should rock. The price, after initial installation isn't -that- bad (seems comparable to common broadband) and the speeds seem adequate - as long as you can live with the latency.

      I realize this isn't a review of the system in question, but the observation of sat systems in general holds. The technology is going to be largely the same. Any time you're bouncing a signal 50k miles (give or take) you're going to have latency. Any time you're dealing with satellite transponders you're going to have bandwidth caps. That's the nature of the beast.

      The question is whether it fills your needs.

      --
      Never attribute to malice what can as easily be the result of incompetence...
    12. Re:What about the price? What about T1? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      For $250 / month and into the thousands to install, wouldn't it be cheaper / better to rent personal office space and subscribe to business DSL?

  21. Watch out for speed-of-light latency by nweaver · · Score: 1

    With a dialup for the outgoing packets, incoming packets still have a round-trip-time of 200 ms to get from the ground station to the geosynchronous sattelite and back.

    I don't know about you, but an extra 200 ms of latency kills my typing skills.

    --
    Test your net with Netalyzr
  22. My recollections from a prior google by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    I was interested in this several years ago, altho I think it was directpc. I wouldn't be surprised if things are the same, or even that they are the same company and/or equipment.

    This was just after they came out with new equipment that was satellite in both directions. Before that, satellite was for downlink only, you still needed a modem for uplink.

    The outstanding complaint was crap customer support. In general, for just about any complaint you had, they blamed it on the weather. A single cloud in the northern sky? Well, wait until it fails on a clear day and call back, buster.

    Even those who liked the service otherwise had nothing good to say about the support. It was enough to persaude me to keep my slow modem.

  23. Better than dial up, but not much by johnmat · · Score: 5, Informative

    My girlfriend has this service at her house, and my experience with it is that the latencies are very noticeable. Web sites certainly load faster than dial up, but not as quickly as the slow (400K) DSL service I have at my house. I have not run ssh over it, but running xterms over my employers VPN service is fairly painful. In fact, the standard Nortel VPN service did not work at all as it timed out - the IT guys had to put me on a beta Cisco server. We have also had a couple of outages over the last 2 months, where the whole service went down for a few hours, and their tech support acknowledged a system wide problem. This service is only worth it if your only alternative is dial up.

  24. Satellite Usage by Merlinium · · Score: 5, Informative

    We had a Remote Worker that was in or near the spokane area, he had to Admin our Network here in Seattle during a Family Crisis. He was able to complete his work without any shortcomings, time of did not matter, it worked well for the remote admin work that needed to be done. And as you already stated this type of setup is not for gaming, but Admin stuff it works. SSH, PHP, Remote Admin, all worked without any problems.

    --
    If firefighters fight fire and crime fighters fight crime, what do Freedom fighters fight?
  25. Simple Physics by swordboy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Distance to geostationary satellite: 22,000 miles (44,000 total round trip)
    Speed of Light: 186,000 miles/second

    Total delay: 44/186 = 0.23 sec = 0.46 for response a two way conversation

    Unacceptable

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    1. Re:Simple Physics by waiting_for_the_man · · Score: 1

      Well, I may be wrong (and I probably am), but isn't this:

      22/186 = 0.12
      0.12 x 2 (round trip) = 0.24

      It seems you may have counted the roundtrip twice. But, hey, we all make mistakes...

      --
      Up on the rooftops Out of reach Trickster is meaningless Trickster is weak -- Radiohead, The Trickster
    2. Re:Simple Physics by Afrosheen · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You forgot to add that the satellite transmitters these little boogers have are regulated by the FCC to be extremely weak. That adds to the latency.

      Also what bearing does the speed of light have on microwave receivers/transmitters?

    3. Re:Simple Physics by Usquebaugh · · Score: 1

      Simple physics indeed.

      You've estimated the lag for communicating with a sat, not for communicating with the down link.

      So is lag on the order of 1 second with these things?

    4. Re:Simple Physics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except you're not using light, but radio waves that move a bit slower, and are impeded by air and various other things. And you're sharing that satellite with ginormic amounts of people. But yes, the latency concern is perhaps a little overstated.

    5. Re:Simple Physics by mbrinkm · · Score: 1

      Actually, satellites utilize sound frequencies, not light. Specifically, DirecWay uses 1210 MHz, 1330 MHz and 1405 MHz on the Galaxy 3c satellite.

      --
      "Don't worry about people stealing an idea. If it's original, you will have to ram it down their throats." --Howard Aike
    6. Re:Simple Physics by roystgnr · · Score: 1

      You forgot to add that the satellite transmitters these little boogers have are regulated by the FCC to be extremely weak. That adds to the latency.

      Does it? Weak electromagnetic waves travel as fast as strong ones. I suppose a weaker signal might make the connection more likely to drop (and thus have to retransmit, after more latency) data.

      Also what bearing does the speed of light have on microwave receivers/transmitters?

      Microwaves are electromagnetic radiation just like visible light, and travel at the same speed.

    7. Re:Simple Physics by swordboy · · Score: 1

      It seems you may have counted the roundtrip twice.

      You have to count twice. The delay is 0.24 seconds just for the packet to go from your PC to the satellite and then to the web server or other internet resource. Once the resource on the other end sends it back, it has to go back up to the satellite and then back down to your PC.

      = 0.48 second

      That is substantial delay on everything.

      --

      Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    8. Re:Simple Physics by 3vi1 · · Score: 1

      How did the parent get modded +5 insightful?

      Microwaves, gamma waves, X-rays, etc. are all forms of electromagnetic radiation and travel at the same speed; the transmitter strength has nothing to do with it.

    9. Re:Simple Physics by DumbWhiteGuy777 · · Score: 1

      The speed of light isn't a constant, you insensitive clod!

      It fluctuates with the material it passes through. Duh.

    10. Re:Simple Physics by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      Wow, did I really get a +5 for a few minutes or the parent I originally replied to? I was asking an honest question..it's been so long since my Physics course I forgot about the speed of light/em radiation correlation. Back to sleep. :)

    11. Re:Simple Physics by DOCStoobie · · Score: 1

      RF doesn't travel at the speed of light either.... not sure what speed RF travels at in open air, but in RG6 coax, its 84% the speed of light.... so that latency is even higher...........

    12. Re:Simple Physics by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      Yes. A 1000ms roundtrip ping is equal to 1 second of lag in my estimation. That's on a bad day though, evidently depending on a handful of factors it can get as low as 500ms.

    13. Re:Simple Physics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, for chrissake.

      The speed of light is medium-dependent. The speed of RF is exactly the same as the speed of light for a given medium, because the speed of light is actually the speed of all electromagnetic radiation in the same medium.

      Learn physics; the ONLY difference between radio waves and light is their frequency.

    14. Re:Simple Physics by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "Total delay: 44/186 = 0.23 sec = 0.46 for response a two way conversation"

      Except that VoIP isn't the number one use for broadband. Latency doesn't matter when all you're doing is downloading music/movies/porn/etc.

      If you're so concerned about two-way conversations, get a cell phone.

    15. Re:Simple Physics by alienmole · · Score: 1
      Actually, satellites utilize sound frequencies, not light. Specifically, DirecWay uses 1210 MHz, 1330 MHz and 1405 MHz on the Galaxy 3c satellite.

      As the other reply has pointed out, this is wrong - satellites use radio waves, which are just a different frequency of the same electromagnetic radiation as light, and thus travel at the same speed as light. Light and radio is carried by photons, massless particles which always travel at the speed of light (although that speed varies in different media - the usual speed quoted is its speed in a vacuum).

      From the quote above, it sounds as though you might be thinking that sound waves are just a shorter wavelength than light, perhaps. But sound waves are compression waves in air - kind of like waves in water - there are no photons involved. Audible sound goes up to about 20 kHz. Ultrasound can go as high as 30 MHz, although used in practice it typically tops out at about 10 MHz. Such high frequencies can't travel all that far, though - unlike light, whose photons travel through air and other "transparent" media without decelerating, sound waves *are* air, and subject to air drag in the same sort of way a car is - a sound wave effectively pushes its way through the air, pushing air in front of it and losing kinetic energy as it does so. Sending sound waves to/from satellites, even if possible, would be very slow and unreliable.

    16. Re:Simple Physics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that is 84% speed of light in a vacuum.

      The speed of light in the coax is...the speed of light in the coax.

    17. Re:Simple Physics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow a thoughtful reply on slashdot with the obligatory "you idiot"

    18. Re:Simple Physics by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1

      Pinging www.google.akadns.net [216.239.37.99] with 32 bytes of data:

      Reply from 216.239.37.99: bytes=32 time=861ms TTL=245
      Reply from 216.239.37.99: bytes=32 time=741ms TTL=245
      Reply from 216.239.37.99: bytes=32 time=731ms TTL=245
      Reply from 216.239.37.99: bytes=32 time=991ms TTL=245

      This is normal for me at any time of the day on DirecWay.

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
  26. Let me go ahead and do it for you by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    --
    Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
  27. 56 k modem? ... by LnxAddct · · Score: 1

    So that explains all the dupes... He must not be seeing the articles until 6 hours after they are posted.

    In all seriousness though satellite isn't the greatest but it's good and a ton better then dial up. I've had to use it before and if that is all they have in your area then I'd go for it. The latency is not too bad and you get used to it quick.
    Regards,
    Steve

  28. ISDN by gtrubetskoy · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Cable and DSL won't ever happen where I'm located.

    I believe the telcos are still obligated by regulations to provide ISDN no matter where you are.

    1. Re:ISDN by Odonian · · Score: 1

      Theres a catch here too. In my town, the CO doesnt have ISDN, so they can offer it to me via a neighboring exchange... at the cost of an *additional* $85/month for connecting to an exchange other than my native one! This doesnt even count the ISDN monthly charge itself.

    2. Re:ISDN by chiph · · Score: 1

      Rob - If you decide to give ISDN a try, send me an email, and I'll give you an old 3Com ISDN router I used to use (no firewall in it, but it will bond both channels for 128kbs). Chip H.

    3. Re:ISDN by jandrese · · Score: 1
      Has ISDN improved in the past three or four years? Last time I looked at it (back in school), it was:
      1. Ruinously expensive: I think the basic install was around $400, plus a $120 month service charge, plus $1/mb, plus $.25/min. Seriously, I couldn't think of any compelling reason for it to cost this freaking much, but it did. And that was the 64kbps ISDN link, which was barely better than my $10/month modem. I don't even remember if that included the ISP cost or not.
      2. Slow: Not much faster than a modem for the lowest tier service, and still well below even low end DSL for the "fast" service (256/256 was the max at the time IIRC).
      3. Dialup: The ISDN "modem" had to dial up whenever you wanted to connect. Granted, it only takes a second or two to dial up, but it means you cannot access your machine remotely.
      Naturally I kept my POTS dialup connection and just suffered with sharing a single modem between 4 guys (and getting nasty letters from the ISP about our monthly time usage).
      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    4. Re:ISDN by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 1
      This post is not entirely accurate for all situations. If the telco can provision both sides of the ISDN line on the same Centrex group, the charge is closer to $40+$40/month with no bandwidth limit. If there is no bandwidth limit, it's trivial to setup a pinger to keep the link open full-time. I used Ascend Pipe 75's on both ends and they would handle bonding both channels for 128k and worked fine.

      I used such a setup for nearly 4 years for my business internet connection until SDSL became available.

      --
      "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    5. Re:ISDN by UberLame · · Score: 1

      I looked into ISDN just a few months ago. Around here, you have to arrange the ISDN line and the ISP seperately. A local ISP was willing to provide 128k service with a fixed IP address for $40 a month.

      The phone company was much harder to deal with. They wanted $120 or so for install (which wasn't too bad). The basic line cost was under $30 a month. However, the cost per minute of use was really awefull. I figured that you use their basic plan, and stay connected all the time would cost over $600 a month. The phone company also offers a flat rate deal of $240 a month.

      So, for a flat rate, always on internet connection via ISDN, it would set me back $280 a month. Somedays I'm tempted to go for it, but if I add $240 (the difference between ISDN and Cable or DSL) to what I'm paying for rent now, the new figure should be enough to rent a nice apartment in an area with cable or DSL service. My current apartment is nice, but it isn't quite that nice.

      However, I have to at least stay until my lease is up. After that, I have to decide if I want to move to a new apartment, or if I just should stick with this one until I can buy a house. But, that would mean a second year with crappy internet service.

      The worst part is that cable internet is affordable per month at my current apartment. However, the apartment building hasn't already been wired for cable, and the cable company wants $5000 to run a wire from the road to the apartment building. The owner of the property, understandably, refuses to pay it, and I'm not willing to do it either for a place I'm renting.

      --
      I'm a loser baby, so why don't you kill me.
    6. Re:ISDN by dkh · · Score: 1

      check to see if local voice is tariffed or not.

      Here it's not, so DOVBS allows us to connect 24/7 to an ISP.

      Comes to around $50/month to the phone company and $50/month to the ISP.

      DOVBS means we can only do 112K but that's not that far from the 128K that we would get with a digital connection. Compression can bring that to 4x more but it depends on the nature of the data - has to be straight text to get the most benefit.

      Now we're in the process of switching to a DSL line (actually something called Extended Network Services as the ISP doesn't have equipment at the telco), it will cut our bill in half and up the bandwidth considerably. Strangely, DSL from the ISP is better then from Verizon - Verizon couldn't provision a subnet and charged twice as much for an account with static ip - but the circuit to my ISP will pass through Verizon.

    7. Re:ISDN by Lost+Penguin · · Score: 1

      "send me an email, and I'll give you an old 3Com ISDN router "

      Does he want two ......
      I got rid of ISDN years ago, RoadRunner, Beep Beep

      --
      I am the unwilling control for my Origin.
  29. Have you though of ISDN by pcjunky · · Score: 1

    ISDN is great if your not downloading loads of stuff. Great ping times below 40ms if you use a router.

    1. Re:Have you though of ISDN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also will be eating ice cream cones with cousin Satan when we get DSL at my place. I had ISDN for about five years, but it was expensive (you pay by the minute) and it was very unreliable in my area (dropped data and phone connections daily).

      I recently changed my line to IDSL, which uses the same TELCO lines/hardware as ISDN, but with an Efficient Networks 5871 (real) router and a static IP address. Costs me about $125.00/mo in California. I've had it for about three months now, and it works great! Hasn't dropped a connection yet, and I get 144/144k throughput with better latency that I had with dailup or ISDN (I know because I use a VPN to mount drives on a remote server, and latency is typically the bottleneck). It's not as good as ADSL/SDSL, but I've been pretty happy with it.

      The only downside was that I had to put in a dedicated POTS line for my phone line since IDSL does not support telephone connections. This actually turned out to be a good thing since my phone connection is now much more reliable.

      Can't wait until high-band wireless comes to my area (I can dream - cant I?)

  30. see if wireless is availible by Indy1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    recently i moved to a small town about an hour north of denver. No cable here, and dsl wasnt availible until last month (slightly off topic rant: qwest you suck balls). Surprisingly all the neighbors had microwave based internet access. For about $50 a month, they get 1mbps up and down, with 10 gigs a traffic per month. You may want to see if that is availible in your neck of the woods.

    --
    Lawyers, MBA's, RIAA? A jedi fears not these things!
    1. Re:see if wireless is availible by FroMan · · Score: 1

      Right... I have started looking into this on the west side of Michigan (come back to Holland Mr. Taco) and http://michwave.com/coverage.html seems to be in my area (Grand Rapids).

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    2. Re:see if wireless is availible by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1

      What about a Jedi who is also an MBA nd a JD

    3. Re:see if wireless is availible by scum-o · · Score: 1

      What ISP does he use for wireless/microwave? Is it Mesa Networks? I've tried to get Mesa Networks in my area north of Denver (Longmont) and it's not available.

    4. Re:see if wireless is availible by Indy1 · · Score: 1

      it wasnt mesa. I cant remember the name, but they were based out of utah.

      --
      Lawyers, MBA's, RIAA? A jedi fears not these things!
    5. Re:see if wireless is availible by Indy1 · · Score: 1

      ok i found out what the isp was again. its www.digis.net

      --
      Lawyers, MBA's, RIAA? A jedi fears not these things!
  31. Bad bad evil bad! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work for, well, for now work for, Earthlink. We sell the DirecWay product and I supported it on the TS end. BAD!%$ DirecWay is evil beamed into space. Its extremly latent, 20% packetloss is typical, and everything is cached through proxies. Oh, and it breaks more often then its up. Just my 2c.

  32. No major problems.... by master_xemu · · Score: 1

    I live in east texas and I got it a while ago. Other then the latency of almost a second (don't even think of gaming and terminal sessions are

  33. I have DirectWay by md27 · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's not bad considering the only alternative is dialup. The latencies are noticed in things other than games, web browsing has a noticeable lag between the link click and the page loading. But the page comes down almost complete in one big burst, so the total time for page load probably averages out close to DSL, you just notice the gap more on the satellite. Our version has a USB connection that hooks the modem to the computer and appears as a USB Ethernet connection. We had to run W2k Server to share this connection out using Routing and Remote Access, but that works pretty well. I'm not sure about the newer hardware, we've been on satellite close to 2.5 years.

  34. Download limit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    From what I understand, there is currently a download limit (150 MB I think) for a 4 hour period. I hear they are working on repealing this policy due to customer backlash..

  35. Friend's experience with sattelite Internet by sgifford · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine had sattelite Internet for a while, whatever DirecTV's old service was called. It was really bad, even for Web browsing. The latency doesn't seem like it would get that annoying, but it does. It seemed there was an extra wait for every image loaded, and normal browsing of the Internet felt slower than on dialup.

    On the other hand, this may have gotten better. Browsers may be better about using HTTP pipelining so everything in a page can be loaded at once, and part of the problem may have been DirecTV's network. A way to experiment with it would be to use one of the various kernel modules for doing packet modification, and cause every packet to be delayed for 1 full second going out.

    I always thought an interesting combination would be a proxy that routed everything over dialup until the connection was full, then started using the sattelite. The most likely scenario would be the HTML itself is fetched over the low-latency low-bandwidth dialup link, and the images are loaded over the high-latency high-bandwidth sattelite link. ssh would use the dialup link, so latency wouldn't be as bad. It seems to me like this would be the best of both worlds. Unfortunately DirecTV's old infrastructure was very closed, making it impossible (or close to it) to experiment with this sort of thing. If this new service is more open, maybe it would be possible to tune it to give quite good performance.

  36. Wireless by -tji · · Score: 2, Funny

    Find some slashdot fanboy in Ann Arbor, buy him a can 'o pringles, and set up a wireless link to you house.

    By the way, with assloads of money from /.'s acquisition, couldn't you find a house a little closer to civilization?

    1. Re:Wireless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the whole point of having assloads of money is that you can live away from civiliation.

  37. T1 by AcmeShells.com · · Score: 0

    Just get a t1 Usually you can get hooked up for about $500/month for everything you need.

    --

    AcmeShells.com The cheapest Eggdrop
  38. DirectWay 2-way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    A neighbor of ours had the service for two months. Every time the neighbor on the other side left his radar detector on in his car (forgetting to turn it off), the directway internet wouldn't work.

    Temporary solution was the neighbor leaving the car unlocked so he could go turn off the radar detector when the neighbor forgot. Passing cars with radar is another problem tho. Overall it seems it doesn't work more than it does. For the price and the slowness I'd probably put up with dialup instead.

    1. Re:DirectWay 2-way by gladbach · · Score: 1

      radar detectors? wow, can you explain why they would conflict please?

      --
      "Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms,
    2. Re:DirectWay 2-way by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Super-heterodyne detectors do a frequency conversion of a signal into a single frequency. The converter uses a VFO (variable frequency oscillator) which can emit RF noise.

      They do this because when you're building an RF amplifier for a radio, it's easier to make one that works at a single frequency than one that works over the entire range of a radio signal (TV signals range from the VHF to the UHF bands - a very wide variation). The signal is converted with the VFO and a mixer to a single constant frequency, then it's passed on to subsequent stages in the radio.

      --
      This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
    3. Re:DirectWay 2-way by Marillion · · Score: 1

      That's also how the OPP (Ontario Provincial Police) catch people with radar detectors. Radar detectors are illegal in Ontario. They have "Radar Detector Detectors" which look for super-heterodyne noise.

      --
      This is a boring sig
    4. Re:DirectWay 2-way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most modern radar detectors are no longer detectible in this manner.

    5. Re:DirectWay 2-way by karnal · · Score: 1

      Funny, I've got a radar detector in my garage that has a "Radar Detector Detector" detector on it...

      Wow, that's getting redundant?

      Anyways, all I can discern it does is shut down the detector when I pass a cop with a detector... I don't live where they're outlawed, but a few neighboring states in the US have instituted laws...

      --
      Karnal
    6. Re:DirectWay 2-way by Marillion · · Score: 1

      Radar Detector Detector Detector? George Boole would be proud. Or furious.

      --
      This is a boring sig
    7. Re:DirectWay 2-way by nolife · · Score: 1

      My radar detector *claims* to be radar detector detector undetectable. I've done work with super-heterodyne equipment, communications gear, and military radar systems back in the day but I never really thought about what is done to these detectors to limit spurious leakage. I'd assume these radar detectors have shielding, cancelation circuitry, or use a different or uncommon/different frequency for mixing to accomplish that goal, or it is just a marketting gimmick.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    8. Re:DirectWay 2-way by LinuxGeek · · Score: 1

      You are confusing two different RF devices here. Radar used for speed detection uses a microwave emission of known frequency and looks for the reflection. Now depending on the band (K, Ka, X, S, etc...), the reflected signal will have a higher frequency per mph of the reflecting target. As an example (numbers won't be accurate), Ku has an increase of around 16KHz per mph. It is fairly easy to subtract the original frq and deduce the speed. The constant is different for each band, but the concept is the same. A shift in the carrier frq is not the same as radio with a modulated intelligence.

      Now even with a simple crystal controlled radio it must detect a frq range to demodulate the intelligence (signal). Commercial FM radio is about 100KHz wide, certainly not a single frq. Even narrow FM 2m ham voice is allocated 10Khz. The only thing that is a single constant frq is the carrier, the modulated portion is by definition not constant.

      Simple superhetrodyne description. Radio is fairly simple stuff at the basic non-computer controlled level. When you move into the GHz range that satellite based services use, the radio transmitter/receiver circuitry is much more complex and construction methods are critical. The radar detector that was interfering with satellite communications must have been quite cheap, poorly shielded and emitting a nice range of powerful harmonics. It probably also did very poorly as a radar detector.

      KI4CJJ

      --

      Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see. - Mark Twain
    9. Re:DirectWay 2-way by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      1) I know how police radars work. The only thing missing from your redundant description is the term "beat frequency".

      2) The radar detector is a superheterodyne (you spelled it wrong) receiver, that emits RF energy at the frequency of the intermediate signal.

      So what am I confusing again?

      --
      This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
  39. My Experiences by Anti_Climax · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure which model we're using, but I had my boss setup DirecWay satellite at his night club, as it was the only broadband option available. The service goes down several hours every night, but we never lose our link. Since the actual ISP is earthlink, you can expect at least a 30 minute hold time for technical support, although that may be a little optomistic. If you can get something else, I would recommend it, unless your rig works out drastically different from ours.

    --
    Even people that believe in pre-destiny look both ways before crossing the street.
  40. Solution to latency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You can route interactive traffic out a dialup link to reduce latency, and all other traffic over the satelite link. See http://www.lartc.org .. Simply use netfilter to mark packets, and policy routing to pick which interface to NAT the traffic out of. Not for newbies, but I'm sure the editor of /. can handle it ;)

    1. Re:Solution to latency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CmdrTaco runs Windows Xp and OS X

  41. Plenty of catches... by duffbeer703 · · Score: 5, Informative
    Make sure you read the service agreement...

    They keep a moving average of your bandwidth utilization. Exceeding the unspecified caps results in your downstream bandwidth being halved, (ie 100%->50%->25%->12.5%) and eventually cut off.

    My parents used this with the previous generation hardware, downloading a Java SDK & Eclipse runtime (say 100MB) resulted in a noticeable decrease in bandwidth.

    It is also way to slow for me to use ssh interactively.

    Here's some snippets of the AUP, from http://legal.direcway.com/index.html#agree:


    6.1 Prohibited Conduct

    (g) to post information on newsgroups which is not in the topic area of the newsgroup;
    (j) to damage the name or reputation of DIRECWAY, DIRECTV, Hughes Network Systems, Hughes Electronics Corporation or any of their respective parents, affiliates and subsidiaries, or any third parties;
    (k) to transmit confidential or proprietary information, except solely at your own risk;
    (l) to violate our or any third party's copyright, trademark, proprietary or other intellectual property rights, including trade secret rights;
    (m) to generate excessive amounts (as determined in our sole discretion) of Internet traffic

    6.2 DIRECWAY FAIR ACCESS POLICY

    To ensure equal Internet access for all subscribers, we maintain a running average fair access policy. Fair access establishes an equitable balance in Internet access across the DIRECWAY Services by service plan for all DIRECWAY customers regardless of their frequency of use or volume of traffic. To ensure this equity, you may experience some temporary throughput limitations. DIRECWAY Internet access is not guaranteed. This policy applies to all service plans including "Unlimited" plans where customers' use of the service is not limited to a specific number of hours per month.
    --
    Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    1. Re:Plenty of catches... by stwrtpj · · Score: 1
      (j) to damage the name or reputation of DIRECWAY, DIRECTV, Hughes Network Systems, Hughes Electronics Corporation or any of their respective parents, affiliates and subsidiaries, or any third parties;

      I'd love to hear their definition of what constitutes "damage". Technically, this is unenforceable. If I post or distribute information that is damaging to them, but is totally true and factual and not derived from ill-gotten confidential information, I am protected under the First Amendment. To prove libel or slander, they have to go to court.

      --
      Karma: Frotzed (mostly due to the Frobozz Magic Karma Company)
    2. Re:Plenty of catches... by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      Sure. You are absolutely correct.

      <reality> When they threaten to cut your access and turn your $700 equipment investment into scrap, you will roll over and play dead. If you have the resources to sue them (or take them into arbitration, most likely), they'll layoff.</reality>

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    3. Re:Plenty of catches... by demachina · · Score: 1

      I hate to break it to you but satellite transponders are an expensive, finite resource. I would way rather live with their fair use policy versus having a bunch of bandwidth hogs, running fill tilt all day every day downloading movies, MP3's and CD images make it slow for everyone, all the time.

      The rest of their policies are about the same thing you are going to get from any corporate ISP these days.

      --
      @de_machina
    4. Re:Plenty of catches... by Gaijin42 · · Score: 1

      they don't have to prove libel to just cancel your service.

      First ammendment says you get to say what you want. It doesnt say that any particular company/newspaper/tv station has to help you broadcast your message.

    5. Re:Plenty of catches... by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      There is no question that you need a fair use policy. The problem with DirecWay's policy is that it is undisclosed and static. "Fair" behavior one month is "Unfair" the next... and never documented.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    6. Re:Plenty of catches... by Fammy2000 · · Score: 1


      6.2 DIRECWAY FAIR ACCESS POLICY

      To ensure equal Internet access for all subscribers, we maintain a running average fair access policy. Fair access establishes an equitable balance in Internet access across the DIRECWAY Services by service plan for all DIRECWAY customers regardless of their frequency of use or volume of traffic. To ensure this equity, you may experience some temporary throughput limitations. DIRECWAY Internet access is not guaranteed. This policy applies to all service plans including "Unlimited" plans where customers' use of the service is not limited to a specific number of hours per month.


      My brother in law has DIRECWAY and hates it. He gets "FAP"ed once a day. The threshhold is a really low value, like ~150MB over 4 hours. After that you're lucky to get 2K/s. Steer clear!

      --
      If I had something intelligent to say, I would have said it.
    7. Re:Plenty of catches... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "undisclosed and static"

      no.

      Undisclosed and ever-changing

      or

      Undisclosed and dynamic.

    8. Re:Plenty of catches... by abbamouse · · Score: 1

      Pay attention in Social Studies class. Or even if you can't bear to learn the basics of your government, Google "first amendment" before running your mouth:

      Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

      --
      Make cheese not war 8:)
  42. two-way satellite by gordona · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think that you'll have a problem with VPN as well, due to the latency. I was using DirecPC, which was an asymmetric architecture with a phone line return. I saw an increase of about 500 msec in ping times using DirecPC over phone modem. For two-way satellite, the latency will probably be about 1 second. This kind of latency killed my VPN connectivity or at best made it unreliable. As an alternative, why don't you set up a neighborhood wireless cooperative sharing a T-1 line. See for example: http://www.magnoliaroad.net.

    --
    "Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room!" -- Dr. Strangelove
  43. Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I heard that he's still on a BBS at 300 BAUD and he just likes to boast that he gets 56k.

    Seriously though, I was shocked. But it may explain something that I was musing about a few days ago - Slashdot's avoidance of huge graphics, the evil JavaScript and vile Flash. Maybe we need to keep TACO at 56K.

    1. Re:Way by DCheesi · · Score: 1

      But it may explain something that I was musing about a few days ago - Slashdot's avoidance of huge graphics, the evil JavaScript and vile Flash.

      I always assumed that it was more about limiting the load on the poor servers; ie. keeping Slashdot from being slashdotted :)

  44. When you have absolutely no other options... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...DW is the way to go until the next wireless tech is embraced.

  45. 56K?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    56k?! Let's show him the slashdot effect boys ;) Talking about a taste of your own medicine...

  46. Satellite Experience by Evanrude · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I assisted a friend of mine in setting up his DirecWay system about a year ago. I am not sure what the "professional installation costs" were, but they had no satellite service of any kind prior to the install. I know that at that time, you had to purchase all the hardware, which ran about $600.00.

    Aside from that, the equipment at that time had to be plugged into a computer via. USB and setup via Windows only software. If you wanted any kind of routing done, it had to be done through Windows.

    The hardware/software may have changed since then and they may now offer an ethernet port and a more OS friendly configuration.

    Aside from those things, the speed was nice for web browsing and any other low impact services. I do recall using ssh and it seemed to work ok. The latency isn't as noticable as it would be playing a game.

    That's my experience...

    --

    ~.Evanrude
  47. The most important 3 words are ... by PaulK · · Score: 5, Informative

    Fair Access Policy. Learn them, love them, leave them. Here is one war story.
    There are sites dedicated to the incredible level of FAP abuse that is piled on customers.

    Here is a place for you to study.
    This may be more relevant to your needs, here.

    1. Re:The most important 3 words are ... by bucky0 · · Score: 1

      Lol, I just got done reading fark when I saw this:
      There are sites dedicated to the incredible level of FAP abuse that is piled on customers.
      Threw me for a loop there for a second :)

      --

      -Bucky
    2. Re:The most important 3 words are ... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      There are alternatives to DirecWay and Starband.

      Skysurfer is one, I think through SkyVision company. It allows the use of an old 6ft c-band satellite dish. It is still one-way, requiring a modem and phone line for the uplink but the costs are less. Last I checked, they were a lot more up-front about the fair access policy too.

      Details are at www.cband.net

  48. Works in CO Snow Storm by Eyah....TIMMY · · Score: 3, Informative

    I went through several storms and was surfing the net quite well, while airports and road were closed.
    The only problem I had was when snow got in the actual dish, then I had to get it out. I only had to do that once though. Most of the time the wind blows the snow away.

    --

    It is not enough to have a good mind. The main thing is to use it well. - Rene Descartes (1637)
    1. Re:Works in CO Snow Storm by kmankmankman2001 · · Score: 1

      Echoing the above comments - snow falling (Chicago), no problem. Snow accumulating in the dish - problem. This only happens under very specific circumstances as the snow usually doesn't stick in the dish. When it does, as I don't have a ladder, it is difficult to remedy. It's happened twice and each time I did the following: stand in the front lawn throwing snowballs up at the dish till the snow was dislodged and slipped out. Crude, not especially efficient, but wildly entertaining for the neighbors I suppose. Note: this is for a DirecTV dish as I'm lucky enough to have a choice of both cable and DSL and don't use DirectWay. I have a friend that was using DirectWay up until fairly recently with good results (and understanding all the usual caveats about interactivity and upload limitations).

      --
      "The bigger the lie, the more they believe." - Det. Bunk
    2. Re:Works in CO Snow Storm by TheGax · · Score: 1

      http://www.coverscompany.com/enter.htm Here is one place where you can get a shield to put over your dish. Keeps the snow off.

    3. Re:Works in CO Snow Storm by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      I have a friend who sells direcTV equipment. He has a heated dish, that'll get rid of the ice and snow for you.

      dssaccessories.com

      I apologize for the ugly site. I'm redesigning it for him right now. The new site is pretty, but not quite ready.

      He ships very quickly, and you'll get exactly what you wanted. I got my 5 input, 8 output multiswitch w/ power supply from him overnight. It was very useful since I had just moved into a new house, and was kinda missing that one piece. I don't trust anyone to hook up my equipment but me, so I didn't have DirecTV do it. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  49. Move to Livonia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what I did when I graduated and got the hell out of A2

  50. Run while you still can! by camt · · Score: 1

    I have no experience with the DirecWay service, but I had used StarBand when they were still around.

    Honestly - I would prefer 56K dialup. You just don't understand how bad the latency is on satellite service until you've used it. I would wait 14+ seconds at times for responses. It's like the tortoise vs. the hare. Slow and steady beats fast with long naps between laps.

    Stick with your dial-up or try convincing someone to start a good wireless ISP near you.

  51. A Bad Experience by Odonian · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm in the same boat, no DSL or Cable. I tried DirecWay dial return service. The latency is pretty horrible (500ms and up) making things like ssh excruciatingly painful. The 2 way DirecWay sat is supposedly even slower in temrs of latency, since you pay the 22,000 mile up-and-down penalty twice. Web browsing as well can be slow due to this latency, since multiple requests get made per page load. You can fiddle with the settings on your browser and packet sizes etc to help this, but to me browsing felt slower than on a reliable 56k line. Things that require bigger downloads like flash animations are faster, though. If it's bandwidth you are after, then you have to worry about FAP - the Fair Access Policy. This limits your BW usage by throttling you down once you exceed some magic threshold for some period of time. If you web browse only, you may not see it but if you download stuff, you'll probably hit it. I also had problems due to trees. DirecTV is an order of magnitude less finicky than DirecWay in terms of positioning, and I struggled to get a good signal when my DirecTV was just fine. Could have been by location though. If you get the Dual dish, you will have to play fancy games with dish rotation to pull in both internet and TV. I'd recommend pro installation unless you really enjoy mucking with setting up dishes, etc.

  52. Don't do it! by mo · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've had the misfortune to use satellite internet. Here's a quick summary on how it behaves:

    - ssh sessions or terminal server are unusable so if you do any remote access of any machines, forget it.

    - web browsing is about the speed of a dialup unless you're looking at pages that are one huge chunk of html with no images. Most pages these days are lots of little images which totally lags on satellite. Note that you may reduce the pain with caching proxies and/or HTTP keepalive/pipelining but it's a lot of work, and at least one of your daily reads will not improve with this.

    Anyways, unless you're out in the middle of the jungle, I'd just stick with cheap dialup. You can save your money up and build a long range wifi link.

    1. Re:Don't do it! by DCheesi · · Score: 1

      - web browsing is about the speed of a dialup unless you're looking at pages that are one huge chunk of html with no images.

      Err, you mean like Slashdot discussions? :)

    2. Re:Don't do it! by jetmarc · · Score: 1
      > Most pages these days are lots of little images which totally lags on satellite.

      You may want to try Opera. It lets you configure the number of simultanous connections to servers. If you increase it to 100 or so, you will have to wait once for the HTML, and once more for all the images.

  53. Kuro5hin.org is decently 56k-friendly by RLiegh · · Score: 0

    and I doubt with all that cmf money that Rusty Foster has to settle for dialup access.

  54. better than nothing... sometimes by A+moron · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've been using it for about 4 months now.

    It pretty much sucks, but until there's a better option, it's usually better than dial-up.

    You'll probably find a more informed discussion at broadbandreports.com forums. Also check out their Satellite FAQ

    SSH sessions are pretty bad. However, in pinches they are possible by "typing blind". ie. typing your slew of commands and waiting for them to appear/happen. Can be a bit dangerous. :)

    Reliability is pretty bad. We have regular snow and rain storms which usually knocks it out of service.

    Speeds, http download is alright, although there is always a slight delay before things happen due to latency. Other download speeds suck, especially anything is encrypted. Upload speed is as slow as if not slower than modem.

    But, we don't have any other options at the moment (come on airships!)

    BTW our setup two way direcway using a dedicated w2k box with crappy internet connection sharing.

  55. What about ISDN? by gwynnebaer · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Everyone ignores ISDN and leap frogs to other technologies. Dual-channel ISDN is quite usable for what it sounds like you need.
    Can you get that at least?

  56. Tried it by IamNotAgeek · · Score: 1

    We got it so my wife could work from home. As for just surfing the net it seemed to work OK (better than dialup). But we found that VPN speed was the same as if she dialed up to work and the main application she used didn't work at all. And when the wind blew the signal went to crap. (could be how the dish was mounted but it is a larger dish than what is used by direcTV). So since we couldn't justify the cost we cancelled it. (we had to eat the installation cost ~$200).

    --
    All generalities are dangerous except ones that start with "All /.ers"
  57. You could try this.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My dad lives near Bay City and they are set up with something simular called Speed Net (http://www.speednetllc.com/) Seems to work quite well.

  58. Speednet by bjmorel · · Score: 1

    I have had Speednet for almost a year and a half. If you live anywhere near Saginaw I would highly recommend it. It blows away the Satillite service I had before it. www.speednetllc.com

    Brian

    --
    That's About It!
  59. I was almost blighted by xrayspx · · Score: 1

    I almost bought a house (put an offer on) in an area with no cable and no DSL. I went to work researching DirecWay, and all I got from DSLreports was complaint after complaint. Well, I thought, no one ever writes in about how GREAT their service is, right?

    So I looked at all the literature from DirecTV, and it didn't look much better from that angle. $600 UP FRONT fee for equipment, plus $60/month for a service which MIGHT give you 500kbps downstream and ~100 up. I do a lot of remote administration using Windows apps, and although I've done it on dialup, and it's not /that/ bad, it's not something I'd look forward to.

    Plus, and here's where your problem would come in, they have TOC enforced caps. If you pass your given download quota for a given period (ie you transfer down a set of Debian .ISO's and it takes a day), blam, you're cut off. You have to call in and get them to undo it, which can take days. I wasn't prepared to call someone else when I was on call and say "hey, I know it's 1:30 am, but would you mind going on and fixing this server, DirecTV cut me off, again".

    In the end I was going to just get dialup, maybe get 2 accounts and team 'em up to get a bit more speed, rather than deal with the flakiness I saw inherent in DirecWay and its competition. I looked HARD for any answer, and the best I could do was dual-dialup. (unless I wanted to spend $175/month on ISDN, or several hundred more for a full T).

  60. Direcway by Nerdy · · Score: 1

    I have the professional version of direcway so that I could get a static ip and a large bucket ( 350 MB I think ) before I get fapped as they call it. For the most part it's ok, my downloads average between 100K and 150K ( Kilobytes ) using internet explorer and if I use one of those download accelerators I've hit 500K a sec. Uploads are pathetic... about modem speeds. If you don't get a static ip, your stuck behind their NAT.

    HTTPS is really really slow. I still use the older DW4000 which requires a PC to run their software. I put together a mini-itx system with windows xp running winroute. It looks like a router to the rest of my network. I have not upgraded to the newer DW6000 systems.

  61. Consider wireless with that T1 suggestion? by Toad-san · · Score: 1

    Consider locating others with your same problem in your neighborhood or area.

    All pool together in a T1 line (or convince a local business to do it).

    Then use radio links (which can reach kilometers these days with the right antenna) to connect the members of the group to the T1 owner.

    Might be well worth the effort / coordination, you'd all get high speed, the T1 owner would become a mini-ISP.

    My stepson and I seriously thought about this before we finally got Roadrunner (and now DSL).

  62. Unaccetable caps by iantri · · Score: 1
    DirecWay has insane caps -- you get to download 600MB, then they throttle you to about 3kb/s for 24hours. The 600MB cap slowly increases from 0 (you used it up) to 600MB over that period.

    Also, latency is terrible. we're talking 600-100ms. SSH would not be fun.

    And it's expensive too.

    I'd say look for a wireless provider in your area, if there is one. Or maybe (and I don't know if it is even available anymore), if speed is less of an issue but you need good latency, ISDN service? The speed isn't great (11.5kb/s), but it's better than nothing..

  63. Speaking from experience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I live about an hour out of Minneapolis, and for a long time satellite was the only option we had other than dial-up. We used the direcway two-way satellite system for about two months, and I gotta tell you, it was a truly horrific experience. For starters, there's the speed. Not only is the ping terrible (quarter to half a second), but the speed was only double or triple what we were getting over our free 56k modem connection. Now, for some people that modest speed increase is worth $100 per month, and I was willing to tough it out at least until the one-year contract expired and I could quit without paying the $600 early contract cancellation fee. That was until the damned thing simply stopped working. It was pretty intermittant to start off, being down for a few hours every day, but one day it just died. I called tech support to try and figure it out, and that was when I learned about download caps. I'm pretty sure you won't find anything about this in any of their literature, but if you download more than 200 megabytes over any 4 hour period, they severely restrict your bandwidth. If you manage to download more than 250 megabytes over any 5 hour period, they simply cut you off for a few days. So basically, you're paying $100 a month for bandwidth that you're not allowed to use. So, I found myself with no service for a few days. Then for a week. I called tech support back, and they told me there was no reason why my connection shouldn't work. I spent 12 hours on the phone with tech support over the course of 3 days until I finally decided to just cancel my "service." After all of that I still had to pay the $600, just to cancel my service that I wasn't getting.

    By the way, I also have DirecTV, which works fine, so that shouldn't be any indicator for how well the satellite internet will work.

  64. In Colorado... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have a download limit of 169MB every 4 hours, and the best speed I've ever gotten off them was about 90KB/s. I'd highly recommend cable service if you could get that instead. In the same rural Colorado town, I get 3Mbit down and 256K up from my cable line.

    The customer service was HORRIBLE. They hired people with almost no english language experience, and NO technical experience. They just read off a computer screen, with no clue as to what they're doing.

    Please note this is just in my little town, but I figured that the customer service is off a 1-800 number, so it's most likely the same everywhere in the US.

  65. abusing power by moojin · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    "I'm abusing my power as Slashdot editor to ask for experiences with this (or similiar) services."

    YES YOU ARE.

    You should have submitted your "Ask Slashdot" article to another editor to be reviewed and accepted or rejected.

    --
    Why did I lurk so long before registering for a Slashdot account? I could have had a Slashdot ID of less than 100000.
  66. don't do it by tkrabec · · Score: 1

    I had 2 neighbors that had it and cancled, both are looking to get rid of their equipment, not the newest stuff, but it was not much faster than dialup, and it was very laggy. I would not and did not purchase it becuase of their experineces.

    -- Tim

    --
    TKrabec Pahh
  67. Things to know by 1gkn1ght · · Score: 1

    I have a neighbor that has this, and I was not at all impressed. At least once a day they have to shutdown their computer, disconnect the terminals from the dish and the modem, touch the ends to ground it out, put them back in, and turn the computer back on. Their signal strength is only at a 60. They should have much more, just poor installation, and because it is working, DirectWay will not come out to fix it without them paying them to do it.

    I do however know someone else down the street that has it, and does not have that problem. Their signal strength is much higher.

    Also, keep in mind that they put you behind their firewall and NAT. You get a 10. addy, so you will not be able to host anything or connect to your computer from the outside at all.

    You also are limited to your bandwidth for the day! Its not like cable where you have a cap, and you can go all day using as much as the cap allows you to. DirectWay (sorry, don't have the exact numbers) will shutdown your connection for the entire day once you use up your allowed bandwidth. It is set lower during the day than it is at night, but personally for what you are paying, I don't think thats worth it. If you use anything like KaZaA (for legal reasons of course) you will have to pay attention to how much bandwidth you are pulling so they don't shut you off for the rest of the day.

    I myself will not be getting DSL or Cable anytime soon, and thanks to wonderfully old Verizon phone lines, I get 26.4 connection speeds with a modem. I will not go with d to use SSH to often, the lag is not the best with that either.

    --

    "Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they AREN'T after you."
  68. You should keep a modem and do port based routing by gte910h · · Score: 1

    Route the ssh over the modem, and use the web, ftp, etc over the satelite. There are several toolkits that do this.

    --
    Want to see every step I took to start my company? http://www.rowdylabs.com/blogs/pitchtothegods
  69. Don't Do It! Stay away from the light! by ramsejc · · Score: 1

    We used DirectWay in our remote site for similar reasons. We had it a year and a half, and it worked 24 hours constant I think once or twice during that time. Every day when the kids got home from school/job/college/etc. the connection would be there, but the latency made it unusable. We ended up buying the local telco service a remote office on our site, so we could get DSL. Big bucks, solved our problem. If you don't have that kind of money, or even if you do, my advice to you is rid yourself of all computers, move to Mexico, and plant lots of potatoes.

  70. StarBand (Echostar/Dishnetwork) by armoursin · · Score: 2, Informative

    A few years ago I got StarBand at my house due to the same rural limitations you suffer. We ended up using our 2 dialup connections along with the satellite and eventually just got rid of the satellite. It was terribly slow during peak hours (anything not midnight to 8am). During the off hours we could get download speeds of up to 2megabits/sec. Secure webpages just didn't work. I don't know if that was due to restrictions by StarBand or not. (to boost performance, they limited a lot of things you could do) The ~800ms latency made things like Telnet and SSH almost unusable. E-mail via Outlook also didn't work as it would time out too quickly. IMHO, it isn't worth the grief, unless you keep your dialup connection and use them simultaneously. With a proxyserver we were able to do the undoable-over-satellite via dialup.

    --
    Free iPod -- http://free.pawireless.org/
  71. Worse than that by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    You send packet --- up from you and down to them.

    You get reply --- up from them and down to you.

    Four trips. Twice as slow.

  72. Seems prone to weather outages/crashing? by ViXX0r · · Score: 1

    I have a friend in an high-speed inaccessible area of Nova Scotia and he just signed up with Direc. The area has been getting a lot of wind and snow lately and his connection seems really intermittent while that's going on. He also complained that the router crashed at least once for no apparent reason requiring a power cycle to correct it.

    He told me it cost him $1200 for installation and $90 a month for unlimited use. (That's in Canadian currency).

    It doesn't seem like an ideal solution but it's better than nothing (or dialup). One thing he hasn't complained about is the speed, so I'd guess that's pretty good when it's working.

    --
    University - a box of academia nuts.
  73. 56k????? by stuffedmonkey · · Score: 0

    If I were Taco - I would have posted this under another name. Up next: a story asking if the products in those "enlargement" spams really work ;)

  74. Rain OFF dish by wowbagger · · Score: 3, Informative

    Water is a conductor*, so when the water coats the face of the dish it alters the focus of the dish by altering the shape the RF "sees". Screw the focus of the dish up, and you go from many tens of decibels of gain to as low as 0 dBi.

    Keep the dish dry, and the focus stays sharp, and the only effect the rain has is a minor attenuation in the path from the bird to the dish.

    (*Pure water is an insulator, of course, but given dirt in the air and on the dish and you will have enough ions in the water to make it a reasonably good conductor - enough to alter the dish's focus.)

    1. Re:Rain OFF dish by tbase · · Score: 1

      I knew there was a good explanation. I first discovered it when I had my dish on the screened in lanai at my apartment. I was amazed I got less rain fade going through a screen than not. Then it dawned on my that it was the fact that the dish was staying dry. Now it's just under the eaves of our house, but it's enough to keep the rain off it.

      --

      666-607: 6th floor apartment of the beast
    2. Re:Rain OFF dish by Big_Breaker · · Score: 1

      I wonder if they put a coating like rain-x on those dishes. Plastic is already pretty hydrophobic. You could also put a hood over the dish.

    3. Re:Rain OFF dish by endoftheroadmatt · · Score: 2, Informative

      Are you sure about this? If the signal is in a microwave band, most likely it's in a band that's absorbed by water. Thus the rain is absorbing signal, not refracting it. And yes, I am an RF Engineeer.

    4. Re:Rain OFF dish by p7 · · Score: 1

      You are correct, it is not because water alters the focus. My guess is that the water may have been collecting on the dish a bit, if your reception increases after getting it out of the rain.

    5. Re:Rain OFF dish by dcm1101 · · Score: 1

      It is in the Ku band (14-14.5 GHz up/11.7-12.2 GHz down). I would tend to disagree with the parent poster - the path attenuation on a CLEAR day can be on the order of 200dB each way, and atmospheric moisture over either your antenna or the SOC's antennas can screw your link budget no matter how dry your antenna is.

      DSL Reports maintains a DirecWay forum as well.

    6. Re:Rain OFF dish by Webmoth · · Score: 1

      What you need is a GoreTex membrane (the membrane only, not a GoreTex rain jacket) hood over the dish. Since GoreTex is made out of Teflon, it does a pretty good job of shedding water, and it's transparent to RF.

      --
      Give me my freedom, and I'll take care of my own security, thank you.
    7. Re:Rain OFF dish by wowbagger · · Score: 1

      The amount of water ON the dish, from an absorbtion standpoint, is a pittance of the water in the sky between the dish and the bird.

    8. Re:Rain OFF dish by Holi · · Score: 1

      Actually when I used to install them in Oregon we used Turtle Wax on all the dishes we installed. It worked wonders. None of our customers suffered from rain fade.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    9. Re:Rain OFF dish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I just did some tests with my DTV dish yesterday night (dry weather, clear sky, 25 degrees celsius outside temp). Before, I had something like a power quality of 85 at one transponder. I went and dropped some water over the LNB and the signal meter went down to 73. Then I sprayed some water over the dish (1mt, non-mesh, ku band, treated with rain-x wax) and it didnt affect the signal quality. The water ended up over the dish in small drops of something like 2mm diameter, which are similar to the diameter of the holes in a mesh-ku antenna I use when I go on vacation to see DTV wherever I go.

  75. The Basics by Daikiki · · Score: 1

    Straight from the horse's mouth: Downspeed is 500 kbps, upspeed is 50. Service costs $59.99 or $99.99 a month, depending on your setup. If you opt for the 59.99 plan, you'll have to pay $399 for hardware, $100 for installation, and $100 for setup. The $99 a month plan subsidizes the cost of installation and equipment so you'll only pay the $100 steup fee up front. Both plans require a 15 month contract.

    Having Direct TV is not a boon, since the dish required is a separate one. Professional installation is mandatory because setting these thin gs up requires a lot more precision than a simple sat. TV system. Reliability is better these days than it has been, but servicxe is still prone to interruptions caused by atmospheric consitions. The router is OS-agnostic and accounts come with a single dynamic IP addy.

    Hope this helps.

    --
    I want the fire back.
  76. from experience by andsmi · · Score: 1

    I have direcway two -way, had one way back in the day, just upgraded recently. It's better than a 56k modem, but not by much. If you want to browse you and edit slashdot then you will likely be better with some sort of accelerated dial-up. If you want to download a 50mb file in a reasonable amount of time use direcway. If you want to download anything larger than 200MB, do it in chunks. FAP will get you (an I hope the lowsey cable users someday to). It's worth the $54.99 a month (I think that's it) if you are a geek. Don't try and do VPN over it. Unless you go "pro" version ($120 a month?) then it may work....may that is.

  77. Get well acquainted with the FAP by briansz · · Score: 1

    If this is anything like DirecPC was/is, the FAP makes it almost unusable. If you do much downloading at all, you'll find yourself back to modem speed in short order, and paying about 3x as much for the privilege. Cleaning snow off the dish is always fun too, it is much more sensitive to weather than DirecTV. I won't get into the Mind-Numbing tech support (I swear it was prison labor).

    Maybe they've improved it since I had DirecPC four years ago, but be very certain of what you'll receive before you get locked into a contract.

    Honestly, I'd build a yagi to receive broadband from somebody I'd befriended 5 miles away if geographically possible. Failing that, I'd just shotgun 3 modems before I'd ever consider having DirecPC again.

    Also, you don't mention neighbor proximity. I know of one location in Southern Colorado that is 80 miles from a major city (if you consider Pueblo major), 10 miles south of a town of 10,000 people smack in the middle of NOWHERE that has a T1. It's a radio station antenna building on the top of a ridge at roughly 10,500 feet. Maybe you have 6 neighbors who are as fed up with dial-up as you. A fractional T1 would be affordable after the initial equipment layout if you create your own little ISP and serve your neighbors with wireless access.

  78. Re: Complicated Software by aheath · · Score: 2, Informative
    Your brother may want to consider upgrading his setup. The DIRECWAY FAQ states:

    "Q: What is the difference between the DW6000 modem and the DW4000 modem? A: The DW6000 is the next-generation DIRECWAY system modem with a sleek new design. It makes connecting to the Internet easier by incorporating DIRECWAY software inside the DW6000 unit. So there's no DIRECWAY software to load on your computer or upgrades to download. The DW6000 automatically updates itself via the satellite. Also, the DW6000 modem houses both the transmit and receive components in one compact unit, unlike the DW4000 that has separate transmit and receive modems stacked together and linked by a 24-pin serial cord.

    It also uses a simple Ethernet connection to connect your computer to your DIRECWAY service. Once your satellite dish is installed and connected to the DW6000, all you need to do is connect your computer by using the provided Ethernet cable and you're high-speed surfing (see 'Can I run DIRECWAY on a small network?' for networking capability requirements).

    Q: Is the DW6000 faster than the DW4000? No. Both the DW6000 and the DW4000 modems deliver the same DIRECWAY high-speed service experience. The DW6000 modem allows you to connect to Windows- and Macintosh-based operating systems, has no software to load on your computer, and makes networking your DIRECWAY high-speed connection to multiple home computers easier (see 'Can I run DIRECWAY on a small network?' for more information on home networking).

    Q: Should I upgrade to the DW6000 from my current DW4000? A: Upgrading from a DW4000 modem to the next-generation DW6000 modem is a good idea if you would like to network more than one home computer or laptop to your DIRECWAY high-speed connection. By networking more than one computer, your family will be able to access your DIRECWAY high-speed Internet connection from any computer on the network and will not have to wait in line in order to get online.

    Please understand that all computers on this network will be sharing a single connection. Simultaneous use of high bandwidth applications by multiple users may result in degradation of speed and is subject to the Fair Access Policy. Actual speeds may vary. Speed and uninterrupted use of service are not guaranteed."

  79. Sprint PCS data connection by Dr.+Zowie · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Sprint's PCS cellphone system includes a data connection. It seems to work at about 150 kbps. You get a USB adapter cable that plugs right into the phone (which can then charge off the USB power). The computer sees it as a 150kbps Hayes modem, and you run ppp over it. Ping times are usually in the 100-200 ms range: too slow for good gaming or remote X applications, but quite usable for typing, browsing, etc.

    The data connection comes free with their Vision service, which in turn comes free with the larger plans. For about $150 or $200/month you can get enough minutes to keep your phone connected 24/7.

    I was rather impressed with the service on a recent road trip (the first time I tried it). If you're in range of a cell phone tower, it might be worth trying as a remote ISP. It's not that fast for the price, but it is completely mobile -- you get the same data service from anywhere in their coverage area.

  80. Bad news by spaceshaker · · Score: 1

    We had bi-directionally satellite internet at I place I used to work. Although it was crazy fast we cancelled it after only a few weeks. The latency was aweful but the real kicker was the unreliable hardware transceivers. The satellite transceivers where USB only and only worked on Windows. So in our case we needed to have a dedicated windows machine to route our network traffic. It make things worse, the transceivers would drop the connection intermittently and the companies tech. support was unable to come up with a solution.

    In short, bad news.

  81. High-Speed Internet in Ann Arbor by spoonboy42 · · Score: 1

    I'd suggest this for high-speed Internet in AA. I regularly pull down 1 MByte/s on torrents.

    In case you're averse to living around the likes of me, however, Comcast does offer cable modem service throughout the Ann Arbor area. As far as I know, their service does not require you to be a cable TV subscriber to sign up.

    --
    Anonymous Luddite: "What do you think of the dehumanizing effects of the Internet?"
    Andy Grove: "Not Much."
  82. Starband by abase · · Score: 1

    At my company due to political problems we went with Satellite from Starband. One thing to lookout for that could cost money is the actual installation. Starband is sold by dealers who in our case also installed the equipment. We have a two way connection and it does work ok. We do get a megabit down and about 120-130 up which isn't too shabby. Sometimes you will lose a signal now and then but it does recover. I would have to say it is an overall positive experience. The one place you will take a hit is FTP. Because of how FTP works it can take a while to upload lots of little files. But other than that I have no real complaints about it and hope we do get Road Runner installed in the summer. -Pat

    --
    73 KC2BQZ
  83. WiFi? by JohnnyComeLately · · Score: 2, Insightful

    At the risk of suggestion something you've thought of already, have you looked into wireless providers that might be offering WiFi? Sprint PCS started offering WiFi on a limited basis to areas their phones cover. If you have PCS coverage, you might have WiFi. Just an idea
    John

  84. 2 Way Satellite - bad VPN support by strangerAndPilgrim · · Score: 1

    I have looked into this technology as I am in the same situation (out in the country). The one reason that I did not go with this solution was that the technology is not good for VPN support. Apparently for a VPN each IP packet requires an ACK whereas for normal IP comms - like browsing,etc. they are able to group packets together to get the high speed. If you are using a tunneling protocol (VPN) they say that you will not get better than 56K.

  85. I'm an installer by AMystery · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A few notes from this side of the fence.

    Performance: obviously the latency, but you also need to know that it doesn't just kill games, web pages can be a problem. They have some fancy caching software that softens the blow so it is tolerable but in general lots of surfing isn't any faster than a 56k and the download cap is very annoying, you can hit it in 30 minutes and basically be offline for the rest of the day. I have a friend/fellow installer who has it and he can't get isos because it would use all his throughput and its not worth it. (He doesn't seem to understand how to throttle things)

    Cost: Its expensive but if its the only thing available then its the cheapest option.

    Installation: It is a dish that has to be mounted to your house and the installers are not highly paid (barely paid is more accurate) so don't expect them to do a good job. If you can wire your house for them and have everything ready then they will probably do a better job. I prefer pole mounts where you drop a steel pole in the ground and mount to it or some other mount that isn't attached ot the house. Digging a trench and sticking some conduit in it out to a wooden or metal pole will make a happy installer who might try to do a better job. These things are huge pains to point and get good signal but they also don't drop as much as direcTV since they are a bigger and more powerful dish.

    DirecWay itself isn't very responsive to problems. They are no help at all if you aren't running windows and their software. Still, given the choice between DirecWay and a 56k modem, I'd probably pick DirecWay, at least if they were the same price...I (*shudder*) was only able to get AOL in my old place and that never got about a 28k connection so moving to here and finally having cable has been amazing. I visit people with DirecWay and its so slow by comparison. Still, get it if you can afford it and a modem isn't doing it for you.

  86. What about a dual modem router? by tbase · · Score: 1

    Have you thought about one of those dual modem routers? They're under $75 and supposedly give 100 MB/s transfer rate. Seems like it might not be a lot cheaper, but would be much more reliable.

    --

    666-607: 6th floor apartment of the beast
    1. Re:What about a dual modem router? by Mongo222 · · Score: 1
      They're under $75 and supposedly give 100 MB/s transfer rate.
      Please... Maximum speed of a modem connection is 56kbs, 2 x 56k = 112kbs. 44kbs muc more likely, so don't count on more than 88kps, on a good day. 112kbs = 114688 bit per second 114688 / 8 = 14336 Bytes per sec. 14336 / 1024 = 14KBs 14KBs != 100MBs 100MB/s is gig ethernet speed. You should be so lucky. B is byte, b is bit.
    2. Re:What about a dual modem router? by tbase · · Score: 1

      I guess you missed both the word "supposedly" and the ensuing sarcasm. :-)

      Me != Serious

      --

      666-607: 6th floor apartment of the beast
  87. Ditto by delcielo · · Score: 1

    That post pretty much sums up my exact experience with the product, right down to the Nortel VPN service.

    --
    Hot Damn! It's the Soggy Bottom Boys!
    1. Re:Ditto by the_crowbar · · Score: 1
      Guess I should throw in my $ .02. :)

      At work I have been implementing a WAN between all our retail locations. One of them is out away from any city and serviceable only with satelite.

      After doing some checking into the way satellite works I came to the conclusion that just about everyone you speak to at Hughes (owners of DirectTV & DirectPC) has no idea how their system works. You can call and speak to them (or a myriad of resellers), but them do not have a clue. I was finally able to get in touch with an engineer at Hughes.

      The engineer seemed to have a clue and told me that just about every type of VPN would be crap across satellite. The reason he gave was that the signal was already encrypted (3DES I think). The overhead of encrypting an encrypted signal was more than the sat modem could handle.

      My experince with it shows the same thing. For any type of VPN work stay away from satellite. SSH over sat. was not terrible, but it wasn't much better than the 28.8 modem I was replacing.

      After working with DSL, Cable, and partial T-1 lines for all other retail offices the satellite is the worst in terms of reliability. In the ~3 months it has been installed it has gone down twice for a couple of hourseach time. The outages have been on clear days. Hughes claims the problem has been with their NOC. (I don't want to start on how poor their NOC must be.)

      Just FYI.
      the_crowbar
      --
      Have you read the Moderator Guidelines
    2. Re:Ditto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm an engineer at Hughes, and the explanation is a bit off. Encryption is encryption - the fact that the packets are already encrypted doesn't make it harder to encrypt. To the encryption algorithm, it's just bits.

      The problem with VPNs is that we use TCP spoofing to mitigate the delays over satellite - essentially, the DW6000 (or whatever box you have - they all do spoofing) terminates your TCP session, sending Acks to your client before the packets have gone over the air. A different protocol is used between terminals which doesn't suffer the same bandwidth-delay problems that TCP does, and on the other side, the receiving terminal spits your re-constructed TCP to the destination. Retransmits over the air are handled by that internal protocol in a more intelligent manner than by letting TCP handle the retransmits.

      None of this is possible with IPSec, because we can't spoof packets when the TCP header is encrypted. VPN Clients use IPSec or other transport-layer encryption, and therefore, when a VPN does work, the performance stinks. TCP doesn't work well over a lossy, high bandwidth delay network like satellite with the default parameters.

      Also, I believe DirecWay's current consumer offerings typically involve NAT or even NAPT before you get onto the internet. That may cause problems with some VPN clients as well (don't know enough about how the clients work).

  88. Initial hardware costs expensive! by dspyder · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I looked into it since I love my satellite television!

    Maybe I was missing something, but it sounded like the equipment startup cost was something in the range of $500-$600... with little to no subsidizing. Looking at their website now, they still have that ($599) at $59.99/mo with no activation fee. It also looks like they're offering a subsidized $99/mo with a $99 activation. So... $600-$99/$40 ~= 12.5 months to make it work buying the equipment up front. Looks like there's a 15 month contract even with the equipment purchased... odd.

    So... satellite definitely has latency. Satellite definitely has problems with severe weather (but it has to be really severe). But if it's your only option, it does provide decent downstream speeds.

    Have you considered wireless of some form or another? Commerical 802.11b gear with big antennas on either end should easily be able to do 5 miles if you have line of site. Another alternative is to bring a dedicated line (T1, etc.) out to you and become a Wireless ISP youself by coop splitting the bandwidth costs between your neighbors...

    Hope that helps!

    --Darren

    1. Re:Initial hardware costs expensive! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had every kind of broadband, but by far satellite was the biggest PITA.

      I moved into the country coincidentally the first month 2-way (DirecWay) was available ( ~early 2001). It cost $2000 for hardware and install, $150 a month.

      Ping times were as expected, but even throughput rarely topped 100k. It was almost always more like 15k, or well below dialup. With rates like that, forget remote work or web surfing. When I got overly frustrated, I would go back to my old dialup account to experience 'high speed'. Their only available router used USB, just to add insult to injury.

      As for customer service, there was none, even if you used Windows 98SE (even Win2K wasn't allowed) and their software. Fortunately, they weren't too good at collecting the monthly fees either. After 4 months, I gave up, and told them that they're welcome to take the dish off the roof. They never came for it, and I never paid any monthly fees or any more payments.

      Fortunately, wireless arrived a few weeks later, at $50/month. At up to 5mbps, it was the better than Cable or DSL, at least until everyone else got an antenna.

      Hands down, 'broadband' satellite is worse than dialup.

  89. Rural geeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The geekiest people may well be the people with the worst internet service.

    I fall in the former category, but not the latter :-) In fact, we got 10" of snow overnight (and it's still snowing) and I'm at 1 Mbps via PPPoE. Hitting a communication tower a few miles away via 802.16 and then microwave 12 Mbps all the way to the metro 60 miles away.

    Nothing but hills, trees and deer here today... rural wifi rules.

  90. I'm happy with it by demachina · · Score: 4, Informative

    I live in the middle of no where in the foothills of the Rockies having moved here from a city with great DSL. The dialup modem went out the window almost immediately. It drove me crazy. You really can never go back after you have broadband.

    You do want the new Direcway 6000 modem. The old 4000 modems use a USB connection to a mandatory Windows box. The shared internet connection from Windows is slow and bites in general. MS really sucks at doing simple networking stuff. I imagine Direcway only sell the 6000 now though it might be a little pricier. We got rebates to trade in the 400 and agreed to another years service but it still cost $200-300 dollars.

    The new 6000 modem is just a gateway you plug in to your Ethernet LAN. Direcway automaticly upgrades it. I wager its a Linux box but I don't know for sure. You set it up and control it via any browser. It works great from my Linux laptop though they only advertise Windows and Mac. It uses DHCP.

    You do want to keep the cable run from the dish to the modem as short as possible to improve the signal stength like any dish. Ours coax is real short and we get about 95% signal strength which is the best the installer has seen.

    If you get a lot of snow and wind is blowing it in the dish it does fill with snow, the signal craters and you have to sweep it, but thats true of satellite TV too.

    They do have a fair use policy and will throttle you if you use it heavily. Trying to download a 300 MB ISO image it throttles at 200 MB, last time I tried, and you drop to modem speeds until the next day. So you need to stop the download and restart where you left off the next day. They have a place you can check your usage and where you stand. I think they throttle you monthly too if you abuse it though I haven't noticed that.

    The performance is better off peak hours. As its gotten more popular the performance has suffered some during peak hours.

    Uplink is not blazing though I send 500-600K attachments on email, they do take a while to upload.

    Latency is certainly a problem. You notice it the worst on web pages that have a 100 little images and URL's embedded in them. Even then I still take it over a 56K anyday.

    I play Everquest on it and its certainly playable though you have to learn to work around the latency which runs from as low as 200 ms up to 700 ms, usually around 500 ms. It was much worse on the old 4000 modem and the shared connection with Windows. You notice it when you try to chase down stuff since they are a 1/2 second from where you think they are so you have to lead them but keep them in view of your camera. Its best to play a caster with snare or root or have a pet to work around this. It takes a while to zone due to the latency.

    The latency would probably make shooters unplayable though I haven't tried any.

    One down side is I think you are putting money in the pocket of Rupert Murdoch and FOX since they bought DirectTV last year and I think DirecWay went with them. So if you dont like Fox politics...

    My sister has the competitor, Starband which is the other satellite option in the U.S. I think it has to run through a Windows machine, at least last time I checked.

    --
    @de_machina
    1. Re:I'm happy with it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One down side is I think you are putting money in the pocket of Rupert Murdoch and FOX since they bought DirectTV last year and I think DirecWay went with them. So if you dont like Fox politics...

      For many of us, this is an upside.

    2. Re:I'm happy with it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is sure hope you are in the minority, but I fear in the U.S. at least you could well be a majority. I'm all for Murdoch and Fox expressing their viewpoint but its a really scary prospect that one person with transparently extremist political views is trying to own half the media outlets in the entire world.

      You may not think Fox's views are extremist but you show them to most people outside the U.S. and they will leave shaking there heads about how American's can be so stupid to fall for some of the propaganda they shovel.

      Showing Fox to people outside the U.S. will help them to understand why American's seem to have gone off the deep end and vote for Bush. It will also leave them deeply disturbed as to how dangerous America has become with this mix of extremist right wing politics and media with a military more powerful, and expensive, than the rest of the world combined.

      A talking head was fired by Fox a year or two ago. She filed suit against them because she was fired because she refused to broadcast a story she and they new to be a lie. She lost the case because the judge ruled Fox wasn't obligated to be truthful in what the broadcast.. Think about it next time you fall for what they say, hook, line and sinker.

    3. Re:I'm happy with it by MyFourthAccount · · Score: 1

      Wow, the first comment that is actually moderated appropriate, the majority of the +5s is of people who have never even seen the freaking system.

      Anyways, I think you are maybe a little over enthusiastic about this system. I _had_ it, in South Lake Tahoe. The real reason we got rid of it was that we moved, but even if we'd stayed, I don't know that we would have kept it.

      I don't remember this in great detail, but I remember the connection was terrible at first. I couldn't get to my POP mail servers sometimes, and sometimes couldn't SSH into a remote server.

      Then I ran some (windows only) software that Direcway provided, and things improved a lot. If I remember correctly, I found out later that all the software did was change some TCP/IP related registry settings (like the MTU, I believe).

      So you may be able to tweak your Linux box to work well with it too.

      I still would say that it's a lot closer to a 56K modem then a 1.5Mb/s DSL line, but you do have the benefit of 'always on' and large downloads are a lot faster than with a 56K modem.

      In my experience the service was not terribly reliable, we had outages fairly frequently (not weather related btw.) and sometimes there were dramatic changes in performance.

      When I was searching for a higher speed solution, I also got quotes for a T1 line. I think it ended up being something like 600-700$/mo. Which of course is directly TAX deductable if you run a business and/or are a sole-proprietor.

      I also learned that AT&T garantuees that they can put in a T1 in _any_ location in the country, I believe for $1000/mo max.

    4. Re:I'm happy with it by demachina · · Score: 1

      As I've said in other posts the setup is a lot different between the old 4000 modems which had a bunch of flaky Windows only software running the modems through USB. In particular they had their own proxy server to try and hide the latency. I imagine it was good for performance but after one of the many Windows Update patches it started crashing on several sites family member used all the time. Direcway tech support, which I've bashed in another post, was completely hopeless in trying to solve the crash. Fortunately the 6000 modem came out, we switched and its been really reliable so far, knock on wood. Again I wager the 6000 is a simple Linux box or some other reliable embedded OS and I wager that is why it works way better than trying to use 100 variants of Windows, and USB, as a networking, gateway solution.

      My sister has Starband and she went through a year of living hell when she first got it. Their tech support blamed clouds, airplanes and sunspots for the constant outages. She finally yelled a riot act at them and they sent a new modem and its worked great since. Flaky hardware in the modem.

      We did have quite a few outages in the summer, they seldom lasted more than 15 minutes. Lately, and especially since upgrading to the 6000 a month ago, I've been using it a lot and I have seen very few, or actually no outages I can remember, other than snow on the dish. It probably helps having a short coax and a really strong signal so you have signal strength to spare.

      I agree its not an ideal setup, and its only for people who can afford it and dont have better options. I imagine its worth doing a side by side comparison, with a dialup that now supports serious server side compression assuming you can get a second phone line at a reasonable price. There is also a company here now that is trying to do rural wireless and I might try them if I were to do it again today, but the setup we have is good enough for 98% of our needs, it works, its a pain to switch, so we're going to stick with it unless it goes south.

      I should note I don't do ssh or VPN over it. If you need to type over it to a remote location it would probably be a pretty poor choice.

      --
      @de_machina
  91. Atmospheric Interference Issues by elzbal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My aunt and uncle have a satellite on their RV. Normally based in Texas, they came to visit me in the Seattle, WA area. They noticed that their service was poorer up here. They had more dropped packets and greater overall latency. I suspect the primary reason involved the angle at which the signal had to reach the satelite - the farther north you are, the more atmosphere the signal must pass through. Does anyone have specific experience from around the same latitude as Ann Arbor (just guessing, from around the 40-45th parallel)?

  92. Salesman has it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    A remote salesmen here has two problems with his satellite 1) Flakey VPN connection (sometimes it will work, sometimes it won't).. the lag is sometimes to much for it to work properly (they state that right on their website). 2) Outage periods: salesman here loses connection for 30minutes every day at the same time. Don't know why.

  93. Where outside of Ann Arbor? by shlong · · Score: 1

    Where outside of Ann Arbor did you move? Places like Chelsea have enough big hills that wireless might already exist and be an option.

    --
    Cat, the other, tastier white meat.
  94. Why should 56K be a failure ? by Krapangor · · Score: 1

    It's besides 34K the most efficient way to create lag in online games.

    --
    Owner of a Mensa membership card.
  95. Experince with Starband (DirecWay competitor) by pelirojatica · · Score: 1

    I have no experience with DirecWay, but I have a couple of years with Starband, which is their direct competitor. The price is steep, but when you are in a rural area, satellite is your only broadband option.

    I compared the options before I got set up, and went with Starband because the DirecWay option had a download limit of 500Mb/month (I think, at the time).

    If you can afford the setup fee, then I say go for it! It beats dial-up every single time, even if it is slower than Cable or DSL.

    I'd have to say that the only performance problem I've had with them is that when it rains REALLY hard, or when there's snow on the dish. For the snow, just scrape it off, and you're fine.

    (I'm not affiliated with either company in any way, etc. and so forth...)

    Good luck...

  96. If it's the only option available... by T5 · · Score: 1

    then I'd say give it a shot.

    Caveats: The DW6000 seems to be a real pain to install. Our tech spent 4 *days* getting it aimed. According to him, it's much pickier than the DW4000, which Directway recommended he use to aim the dish.

    I'm getting about a megabit down, but a frighteningly poor 17 kbits up. Latency for me isn't an issue, but the poor bandwidth out certainly is. It's not much better than Sprint or Verizon's 3G data service.

  97. VPN Issues by bstory · · Score: 1

    Some of my company's outside sales force went out and got this on their own only to find out that they couldn't connect to our VPN unless they bought the business class service. We were unable to tunnel around this so they're paying twice as much for the same service with VPN enabled.

  98. Melting snow by isn't+my+name · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes, it does take pretty inclement weather to truly block the signal. But if it gets very cold in your area when it rains or snows, ice can form in the dish, and that will ruin your party.

    If you can get away with it, think about not putting it on your roof. I live in NW Indiana and the only weather that would throw it out during the weather were the big spring thunderstorms with the cloud tops over 40,000 feet up. Snow never affected it, nor did ice/snow frozen on the dish.

    However, when I got a lot of snow/ice frozen on it, once it started melting, the liquid water running through the snow matrix could take it out for an entire day until the snow melted off all the way. Because of trees in my neighborhood, I had to put it on the roof, and there was no way I was going up there with heavy snow that was melting.

    1. Re:Melting snow by trg83 · · Score: 1

      I highly recommend HEET windshield deicer.

    2. Re:Melting snow by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 4, Informative

      They make remote de-icers for the small dishes that work like the ones on a car's rear-window. A series of strips of electrical-resistive material that you can turn on to de-ice the dish for just such an occurence. They also make EMF transparent cloth covers that you stretch over the whole thing to keep the snow from collecting and turning to ice.

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    3. Re:Melting snow by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      If you can get away with it, think about not putting it on your roof.

      I second that. Although I don't have the sat net connection, I have DirecTV and I put my dish on the wall under the roof overhang. It keeps the rain and whatever else falling from the sky off of it.

      Although, I've yet to test it with snow/ice considering it doesn't do that here....

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  99. Dude, where outside of A2 are you? by djohnsto · · Score: 1

    Not sure where Taco is, but I grew up about 30 miles NW of Ann Arbor in the middle of nowhere. My family is still there. Last time I talked with my brother he had cable modem access (about 2Mb down / 256 Kb up) for $35 a month (Charter communications). I don't know of anywhere near Ann Arbor that doesn't have something.

    --
    Dan
  100. WiMax may be available for you someday by geekee · · Score: 1

    The next generation wireless standard is positioning itself as an alternative to cable and DSL broadband access. Your location may be a prime candidate. Should not have the latency problems of satellite.

    --
    Vote for Pedro
  101. Flash Required by dubner · · Score: 0, Troll

    For a supposedly "operating system agnostic" ISP I'm disappointed that Flash is required to use DirecWay's web site.

    Of course, "agnostic" means "skeptical about the existence of God". Perhaps what is required is a full "atheist operating system".

    --
    Joe

  102. Speednet by ShawnP · · Score: 2, Informative

    There is a large WISP in MI called Speednet

    I know they cover most of Saginaw->Mackinac area but I am not sure how far south they go. There is a *really* sucky webpage available here that shows WISPs in MI.

    I have a few family members that use Speednet and they are really happy with them.

    SP

    --
    "It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong." - Voltaire
  103. Boing, boing, boing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of my coworkers has DirectWay and you can almost hear the outbound bits banging off the dish. It's unbelievably slow. His download speed is super (2 Mbps at times); unfortunately, he can't do VPN connections and he often has to resort to using dialup or going to someone else's house to send large messages. He gets hit with the download throttle whenever he tries to download anything from the MSDN download area. Personally, I'd avoid it unless there's no other option.

  104. Sattelite Internet sux by freakyfreak2 · · Score: 1

    We've had Starband internet service for over 3 years now and I hate it so. It's so slow. The only thing I like about it is the 120-150KB/sec downloads. For everything else it bites.
    I try to synchronize 1 file in Dreamweaver MX 2004 and it takes 5 minutes. It takes a blink of an eye at my house with DSL.
    Most of the time at work I'm forced to use dial-up cause it's ping times are faster. Mostly I need to upload and synchronize files and use SSH. Satellite seriously fails at these tasks. Try typing something in SSH and have to wait 2-3 seconds for it to show up.
    Downloading email to outlook also takes forever. The ping times keep it to one message every 3 seconds. That really adds up when I check the email Monday mornings and I have over 1000 emails to download. I've had outlook take over 3 hours to download my email while using the satellite.

  105. Friends don't let friends use satellite internet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, no, no.

    Run screaming. Better off with ISDN or terrestrial wireless. If you do anything interactive, the half second delay will ultimately drive you insane. The proxies behave in the weirdest way, and the terms and conditions are onerous. A bad, bad way to go.

    Installation is expensive, contracts are long, and service sucks. Forget running a server, upload speeds are WORSE than dialup.

    Have you looked at http://wireless.nether.net/? You are not the only frustrated AnnArborite. Also see http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aawlan/

  106. Video conference problems by coinreturn · · Score: 1

    When I've tried to video conference with my brother-in-law (who has a satellite provider), I've found that the bursty nature of satellite providers to be a problem. You get very high throughput, but in pulses. This works poorly for real-time applications like video conferencing where just buffering to smooth things out adds an unacceptable delay. Apple's iChatAV just gives up and says the connection is too low data rate.

  107. Yeah, i thought married guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    didn't need broadband.

    1. Re:Yeah, i thought married guys by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 1

      More like married guys don't GET broadband, or they get their broadband taken away! It's like its some sort of conspiracy or something.

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
  108. Satellite Hookups by major.morgan · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have setup a few for friends/customers that are barely lucky enough to have phone service. Downloading files, surfing (using their proxy), pulling audio/video streams are all fine. ANYTHING that is interactive pretty much is broken due to ping times of anywhere from 600-1200ms. SSH/Telnet, games, chat (mostly) and VNC/RDP are all essentially unusable. I've also been unsuccessful setting up FTP at the customer side.

    Using their proxy is required to get acceptable performance out of any TCP based protocol, unfortunately they only proxy a few applications and SSL isn't one of them (can't due to the nature of the protocol and how they proxy to get around multiple TCP setups). SSL is SLOWWWWW.

    Summarized: HTTP/FTP/MAIL all are great compared to dialup - anything else is slightly/noticably worse.

  109. Broadband Reports by mbrinkm · · Score: 1

    dslreports.com has a specific forum for DirecWay.

    Dslreports.com

    --
    "Don't worry about people stealing an idea. If it's original, you will have to ram it down their throats." --Howard Aike
  110. Alternatives to Dialup/Cable/DSL by dethtungue · · Score: 1

    I was talking to a Verizon Wireless rep. the other day and he said that the I-94 corridor and the rest of the digital access area of Michigan is expected to get broadband-comparable wireless access within the next year. Wait a little while and get a cellular wireless adapter. Right now the wireless throughput is about 56k equivelent.

  111. Direcway by Pachanga22 · · Score: 1

    I had direcway, for about a week before I finally gave up on getting it to work with my corporate network. We have a page that uses an ntlm login, which is not supported by direcway. It took me four days on the phone with support. I got all the way to level 3 before I gave up. They didn't know what ntlm was and didn't even know how to setup a static ip on the dw6000. The last level 3 support tech I spoke with insisted that I had a static IP of 66.xx.xx.xx and that my gateway was 192.168.0.1 I still have the dw6000 and the transmiter from the dish on the floor in my office collecting dust two months after canceling my account. which they continue to bill to me.

  112. I know by emkman · · Score: 1

    But since he already has a dish it means they dont need to spend time finding a good angle for strong signals or spend time finding a good way to run the cable through his house from the dish to his modem.

    --
    Moderation Totals: Flamebait=2, Troll=1, Redundant=1, Insightful=6, Overrated=1, Underrated=1, Total=12. (not mine)
    1. Re:I know by mbrinkm · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm not positive on this for the differences between the satellites for DirecTV and DirecWay, but the angle and degree of elevation for any satellite dish is dictated by the satellite you are receiving from and your location. Potentially the satellites for both services are close enough where the difference won't matter, but I just don't know with out doing the research required on the satellites and the reception capabilities of the DirecWay dish.

      As far as running the cable into the house, that depends on if the first install was done correctly and if the current feeds run to the same room that you want your internet access in. But, running RG-6 coax, which I believe is the cable of choice for this installation, is not hard unless your house's layout makes it difficult. The only thing you truely should consider is proper grounding, preferebly bonding to the existing electric ground around your power meter. But grounding to the copper pipes of your water system is considered acceptable practice in most areas.

      --
      "Don't worry about people stealing an idea. If it's original, you will have to ram it down their throats." --Howard Aike
  113. Neighbors with the same problem. by nate1138 · · Score: 1

    How many neighbors do you have with the same problem? With a T1 line as cheap as it is these days, you may just want to get with your neighbors and see if they have any interest in pitching in 50 bucks a month or so for a wireless link. If you get 7 or 8 folks together, buy some cheap wireless gear and a few cantennas, you can probably get yourself a "real" connection without all the BS you tend to get from satellite or from regular broadband ISPs (think invisible caps, no server policies, etc). Get a little techno-hippy wi-fi co-op running!

    --
    Where's my lobbyist? Right here.
    1. Re:Neighbors with the same problem. by dspyder · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree more. With commercial-grade 802.11b gear getting so cheap (network cards can be had for almost free after rebate), and antennas becoming more and more commonplace, it's almost too easy to run a dedicated line into one house and slap a decent access point and omni-directional antenna on there to easily serve a small neighborhood. With even small external antennas on the client ends (line of site) you could probably cover a 2 or 3 square (circle) mile radius.

      If nothing else, do it to screw the telcos :)

      --D

  114. DirecWay by Sivar · · Score: 1

    Disclaimer: I work for DirecTV.

    This is my opinion of DirecWay, take it for what it is worth (which may not be much):

    - Direcway is pretty fast. While Direcway gives you an estimate of 400-600Kbit/sec, in reality you can often get 1+Mbit

    - Direcway's equipment is VERY exepensive. Direcway actually takes a loss on the install/equipment package, but it still costs in the neighborhood of $600USD

    - Direcway gives you a lot of geek points. It is a fully 2-way satellite system (DirecPC was only 1-way, using an analog modem for upstream). Unfortunately, or fortunately depemding on your opinion, you cannot install it. By federal law you are REQUIRED to ahve it installed professionally, because it is a 2-way system.

    - I would personally avoid Direcway because it is Windows/MacOSX only. This is their definition of "Operating system agnostic"--Seriously! www.getdway.com actually defines OS agnosticism as working with Mac and Windows! I found this pretty disgusting.

    - While technically you have "unlimited use", if you download more than about 230MB in a short period of time, you are rate-limited to analog modem speeds. This means the next time you download a Linux or BSD ISO, your first 230 or so MB (I forget the exact value) will go fine, but after that it will take forever. This is to reduce the use of bandwidth by those that "abuse" the system. Bandwidth abusers are a particularly big problem for satellite, because satellite bandwidth is quite expensive. Still, it sucks.

    - Other than for gaming, the latency really isn't that bad. For gaming, you are better off with an analog modem.

    Overall, if cable/DSL/wireless are available, go for them. If only analog is available, satellite is MUCH better. At worst, latency is bad and bandwidth is only somewhat faster than a modem when you "abuse" your bandwidth.
    I use cable for internet access myself, because it is better than satellite, and DirecTV for TV, because it is better than cable.

    This is my opinion and obviously not DirecTV's.

    --
    Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes. --E. W. Dijkstra
  115. SSH by raz2 · · Score: 1

    As an answer to your point about SSH, if you are on Windows (and however I don't think you are, I'm gonna mention it anyway :p), SecureCRT has this pretty neat feature to buffer your SSH TX. When I was still on ISDN, I rather enjoyed this feature while I was downloading the latest 0-day Slackware ISOz. 8)

    I'm not aware of any UNIX SSH client capable of buffering though, but I do think you have a good chance of finding one somewhere on the net.

    --


    -raz
    "I shoot troubles with a jackhammer"
  116. I am a current Direcway Two-way subscriber by jeoin · · Score: 2, Informative

    LIke you I live in an area with few broadband options, basically satallite or none. I have been using direcway for over 2 years. Initially as a one way subscriber and currently as a two way subscriber using the direcway 6000. I am very happy with the service. I don't recommend downloading large files. There is a cap on downloading band width, under Direcways limit downloading the latest linux iso is basically impossible. The lag makes online gaming an non issue, unless your playing spades.. I think the cost is a little high considering equipment costs and monthly fees. Proffessional installation is required for the two way systems due to the danger of getting your hand or head in the way of a high power broadcast up to the satallite. In general i am happy, customer support has been sent to India(like our mars mission), but response to issues is usually pleasant and productive. My home is networked cheaply using a couple of netgear switches, but I haven't used Linux to hit the web yet. I am a linux newbie and unsure of any security risks, but I was assured it would work with the 6000; albeit officially unsupported.

    --
    Jeoin
  117. IDSL is a great alternative by Omega1045 · · Score: 1
    A good friend of mine runs an ISP in east Texas (the boonies). As you might expect, there is no DSL service out there. However, a couple of years ago during the net boom telcos were heavily encouraged by the feds to "certify" their lines as being "high speed", which then was 128k. Most telcos "certified" entire service areas as meeting this criteria, whether or not it was technically possible at the time. This has created a great legal loophole to force your telco to provide conditioned line to your house, IDSL style. My friend encourages his customers to threaten the telco in question with the the PUC (Public Utilities Commission) if they don't provide 128k quality lines to their home. He even has a paper he hands out instructing how to do it. He has installed at least 100 customers doing this.

    Hey, 128k (actually 144k with DSL or ISDN) IDSL isn't big-bad broadband. But is is a hellavalot faster than 53.3k.

    --

    Great ideas often receive violent opposition from mediocre minds. - Albert Einstein

    1. Re:IDSL is a great alternative by Omega1045 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, meant "DSL over ISDN"

      --

      Great ideas often receive violent opposition from mediocre minds. - Albert Einstein

    2. Re:IDSL is a great alternative by pheesh · · Score: 1

      Somebody please tell me who at the telco you need to talk to for ISDL? When I talk to them (SBC) they are prtty much clueless as to what it even is. I keep getting routed to the DSL dept, who keep telling me I'm too far from the CO (35000 ft, like I didn't know :-( ). I know I can get ISDN but it's $100 per month not including ISP. And most ISDN ISPs are $60+ for true "unlimited" access.

      --
      They have a tremendous selection of fresh juices
    3. Re:IDSL is a great alternative by Omega1045 · · Score: 1

      $100/month sounds like a rip off. it usually runs about $50, plus ISP. You should be paying around $100 total.

      --

      Great ideas often receive violent opposition from mediocre minds. - Albert Einstein

    4. Re:IDSL is a great alternative by TypoNAM · · Score: 1

      SpeakEasy.net does IDSL which I know for a fact since when I tried getting their ADSL service because DirecTV shutdown their DSL services I had to find an alternative DSL provider and speakeasy could only afford me IDSL which is 144Kb with quite a few static IPs for around $90/month (IDSL + ISP net service), but installtion was costly I believe. Reason why speakeasy couldn't service me because they didn't have a contract with Bell South so the phone company wouldn't let them use their nearest CO to me. Ohh well luckly there was a new ISP local startup company here in Nashville, TN so now I'm happy. :)

      --
      This space is not for rent.
  118. Real world experience by sterno · · Score: 2, Informative

    In the real world, you'll get ping times in the 550-600ms range. It's not at terrible as you'd think, but like I said in a previous post, it makes using a terminal quite painful. It's usable, but really unpleasant.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
  119. I have Direcway, FAP is 169MB a day by Zep1a · · Score: 0
    I've had Direcway since October '03.

    Browsing is fine.

    Non Twitch games ARE playable tho slightly laggy ( I've played EQ Online on the PS2 and it was totally playable, just a tad laggy)

    The FAP is the real downer, it's 169MB per day for a Consumer level account(Slightly increased to around 200MB if your down loading during non peak times (2am til 7am)

    I've never used VPN so I cant comment about that, tho others have said its pretty much useless.

    You can also check a good forum for Sat Internet here:

    http://www.broadbandreports.com/forum/sat

    Good luck.

    Zep--

  120. What about Mexico/Central America? by hey · · Score: 1

    Can I move to a sunny and remote beach town in Mexico/CostaRica/etc and get this kind of Internet access?

  121. Re: Complicated Software by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the scoop. My brother emailed me about wanting to build a network in his house a few days ago, I'll have to pass this on to him before he starts drilling.

  122. Well... by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

    ...I still get my daily dose on 56k. The only time I really need more is if I need to move iso's or something. So, is there truly a need, as opposed to "just nice to have"? Considering the cost differences/TOS, etc.

    --
    C|N>K
  123. Re:Weather / Dish aim and signal quality by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 1

    I've read all of the replies to your message so far. The one thing I don't see mentioned is that outages are due in great part to the installation of the dish itself.

    If the dish isn't aligned plumb with the satellite, is is much more susceptable to outages. Always go for the highest signal strength you can possible get in normal weather. (That means above "acceptable".) That will get you even better reception when the weather is bad.

    People need to make sure their satellite dishes are secure. Maybe it isn't the rain so much as the rain combined with the wind that is shaking the dish around a bit? That'll really wreck a signal when you combine the two.

    And of course, cable quality. If they use bad cables, they're going to hurt their signal quality.

    My worst satellite reception experience? I lost DirectTV *THREE TIMES* when the cable company came by over and over and cut my satellite wire, somehow thinking it was stolen cable (COX). The last time, their fraud manager came out (boy was he a suspicious ass) and put some nice labels on the cables ("DSS - Do not cut") so they wouldn't touch it. And replaced my cables, too.

  124. highly recommend Starband by anadem · · Score: 1

    Starband is working great for me, living in the Santa Cruz mountains.

    It's fast and reliable ... the very few times I've had access problems have been during intense (very intense) rain.

    Performance isn't quite as good as DSL, but it's pretty nice, and totally incomparable to the misery of dialup. My kids say online gaming isn't great because of latency, but that's not an issue for me.

    I'm happily running a home network off my connection, one slow old dedicated modem machine (350 MHz Pentium running XP) with five others hanging off it.

    The only snag I've found is hitting a 5Gb bandwidth cap on uploads -- Internet access been cut off a couple of times, restored automatically by visit to SB's website reset page.

    Tech support when needed has been good -- knowledgable, helpful and free (after quite a long hold time.)

    Alan
    I am therefore I think?

  125. Yes it is affected by bobobobo · · Score: 1

    Remember it is a two-way satellite. Not a passive one-way for regular satellite TV. As such, the signal is more prone to being disturbed. The dish has to be aimed more precisely at the satellite and any wind or heavy rain can affect this. (Disclaimer: I used to work for Starband)

  126. Re:snow by jridley · · Score: 1

    Snow and weather is not a problem for satellite TV, though of course, the cable companies spread a lot of FUD that it is. The cable companies also say that digital cable looks better than satellite, which is also a load of crap.

    Weather MIGHT bother the uplink or degrade the downlink somewhat, I don't know.

  127. This must be Monday... by IamGarageGuy+2 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    This is a new week so that would mean that we must now form brand new opinions of our "enemies." Wasn't DirectTV the company that was suing all of the "pirates" that purchased any form of Smartcard reader? The individual that has the responsibility of what to post and therefore the individual that decides what corporation gets lambasted, is now inquiring about a possible business relation with the same corporation.

    How about a little "Practice what you Preach"

    I have very little patience for hypocrites.

    --
    Stay tuned for new sig...
  128. Such is life in Holland Michigan. by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 0

    I lived in Grand Haven for a summer. It was fun being so close to the lake, but the whole area does lack many of todays modern conviences. Plus, because it is a tourist spot the prices are jacked up pretty high ($1 12 oz coke vending machines back in 93). Poor Taco. My advice would be to learn try it, its most likely not going to be worse than 56 k. Maybe you should see if you can arange something with Hope College. You could be an honorary something or another and recieve free broadband some how. Ok details aren't quit there, but you know and stuff. Mind numb from high speed inter- thingy access.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  129. Bandwidth Limits by Div3B0mbr · · Score: 1

    I believe you get something like 400mb every 4 hours or some crap like that. If you go over their bandwidth limits (I do), your connection slows to a less than 56k quality. Good luck, my DirecWay satellite only sees use when I need to extend my Wireless G connection.

  130. Someone else with experience in the matter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You may want to mail or talk to Jerry Pournelle over at www.jerrypournelle.com . He's been dealing with dialup and satellite connections on and off for several years, now. He's a columnist for Byte, which is still around, and he's been dealing with computers for longer than some people reading this have been alive.

    E-Sabbath, who really should reactivate his old account.

  131. Microwave Wireless by vasqzr · · Score: 1

    I'm in Mid-Michgan, and SpeedNet is very popular. Is there a similar service that serves the Ann Arbor area?

  132. OSDN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Does it cost a fortune for the required professional installation?

    Won't your employer pay for it, given your position?

  133. Please provide the other half of the statistic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    OK, I live in Minneapolis, which gets an ample amount of bad weather (lots of snow and rain) and I can truly say that I have only had a disruption in service twice.

    How long have you been using it? 24hrs? 1 month? 2 years?

    1. Re:Please provide the other half of the statistic by midifarm · · Score: 1
      Sorry, I should've stated before... I've had it for three years. I also really enjoy the online customization of services. It responds almost as soon as you submit. For example, I get the "Sports" package when Aussie Rules Football is in season on FSW. As soon as I "add" that package it's available, unlike when I had cable it'd be to their discretion. Overall I'd say I'm satisfied with the service and the price IS better.

      Peace

  134. Checking in at 33.6K by rs79 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And that's a bonus. Before last week I'd get 28.8K, sometimes 26.4K. After 7 years of this you get used to it. Hell, after a month you get used to it. The only thing you really notice it on is BIG files, for regular eveyrday work stuff the difference with small mostly text based things is barely noticable. Browser caching helps a lot too, if I click preview on this page right here the difference between dialup and a T1 is less than a second. I can live with that.

    I had 128K ISFN when I lived in Toronto in the early 90's, but I live where I do by choice, cripplingly low bandwidth and all.

    If you saw the view from my (home) office window you'd understand. And the people are way different here than in any big sh^H^Hcity.

    The only thing I get tired of is explaining to people: "No, there serevrs aren't here and are not on a dialup. It's actually possible to work on them when you're not sitting at the console".

    --
    Need Mercedes parts ?
  135. I have been very *UNHAPPY* with direcway by Booxbaum · · Score: 1

    I will never puchase a DirecWay system again. First of all, they cap your downloads to 100MB/hour (I think), and then start to ratchet your bandwidth by half until you are down to a crawl. So don't expect to download any .iso files. Also, ping times are around 3 seconds. SSH connections are *possible*, but they really suck. Direcway will give you a utility to setup MS Windows machines to work w/ direcway. To get linux boxes to work, you need to set the direcway box as a proxy, as well as change the window size to 50000 -- I forget the route command, but I can email anybody who is interested (My linux box is at home, and I am at work.) I hope this helps, STAY AWAY!!! mmb@marlboro.edu

    --
    --- Boox
    1. Re:I have been very *UNHAPPY* with direcway by charliedog · · Score: 1

      I, too have been unhappy with DircWay. I live in the country outside of any hope of cable, wireless, any other normal broadband connection. So I was an early adoptor of DirecPC. It was a satellite modem connected by a USB port. I connected the modem to a Win2K server on a three computer home network. The whole setup worked remarkably well less the latency. If low latency is a requirement, then Direcway is not an option. As I recall, I had a few growing pains but a couple of calls to customer support quickly resolved any issues

      Then DirecTV morphed to DirecWay and the cost went from $19 to $50 for the minimum service. I took a deep breath and ordered the new hardware. I followed the instruction to a letter but could not get a strong signal. (I had very few problems with the older system and had no problem getting a signal. The few problems that I had were related to hooking up the network.) So I called customer support expecting the same quality help I got earlier. I learned that they had outsourced thier support to India!! I spent about 15 hours over the next week trying to get a signal and never could. I even hired a tree trimmer to get rid of a few branches that seemed to get in the way. My whole experience was nothing but frustration. I wrapped the whole mess up and put it in the closet. I could never get hold of an American support person to explain my problem and request "professional installation."

      Reluctantly, I went back to dial-up. I am hoping that DirecWay gets thier socks pulled up. I am very anxious to hear about other /. readers. If I had to do this over again, I would not opt for user installation. Customer support was so poor, I was wondering what would happen if I had networking problems and not just signal problems.

  136. five feet of minneapolis snow doesn't affect it... by lindsayt · · Score: 1

    I also live in Minneapolis and have DISH service for my TV. I installed and aimed the dish, and was very careful about it. The aiming bars on the Dish receivers (which may or may not be in dBi - I don't remember) register 96 and 102 for the 110 and 119 satellites, respectively.

    I installed my dish three years ago and have only had two service drops in the entire three years, both in the first six months when I was still using the free pair of lnbs. Since I installed my quad lnb I've never once lost my signal.

    In Minneapolis we get an average of 55 inches of snow per year, with annual precipitation around 28 inches (according to the U of MN). So with almost 5 feet of snow annually and over two feet of annual precipitation, we have a lot of potential obstacles.

    --
    I did not design this game/I did not name the stakes/I just happen to like apples/And I am not afraid of snakes-AniD
  137. Don't do it by hawkbug · · Score: 1

    Whatever you do, don't get this service. My boss has it, and hates it. Dial-up is faster, which is sad. To answer your question, yes, it bogs down during the day and the lag is awful. Dial-up is probably 3x faster for things like SSH and pcanywhere. It's a good concept... until you imagine how it's going to work with 2 way communication. Downstream is fine, upstream is a nightmare. In other words, keep your inexpensive dial-up account until something better comes along.

  138. Get a few extra modems and phonelines. by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

    Multilink PPP. If you're going to be paying $120/mo plus $600 hardware startup, why not go with a few extra dumb phone lines and a few extra 56k modems?

    You'll probably get the same speed as you would from the satelite, but no latency at all. I'm sure *someone* at OSDN can help you rope the modems together and get a cohesive connection out of it. You might need to use some peicemeal HTTP downloader app to get the full benefit for large downloads, but I don't know how multilink PPP works.

    --

    There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  139. DirecWay in tha Pacific Northwest by pinchhazard · · Score: 1
    My boss hooked me up with DirecWay at my house, which is in the foothills of the Cascades in Washington State. It worked great at first: we were cruising along and downloading every huge file in sight. Then it went down for a few months. The techs couldn't figure out what the problem was. We switched to a different satellite with DirecWay.
    Just last week, it finally began working again. We had hella snowstorms this week: service was not affected. There's a lag when you begin using the internet, but afterwards it's pretty smooth. If you've got the funds, I would recommend DirecWay.
    • The service may slow down a bit during the day. I remember it did when we first got the dish - it seems better now on the new satellite, but there could still be problems.
    • The installation is pretty easy, for me. The original modems (one TX, one RX) they gave us were USB, and the new modem/router we have is pretty neat. It connects via Ethernet; we configured the router attached to a single box, then took it off there and plugged it in to the switch and it worked right away.
    • The installation was kind of a pain in the ass, but not much. The techs were good people. The issue we had was that we needed to erect a tube and fill it with concrete, leaving a pipe sticking out for the satellite. Once we took care of that, we just had to run the coax into the house.
    • The service is a bit expensive, especially since you have to pay for the equipment (about $600 I believe.) You can pay this off incrementally on top of your regular bill. However, the installation was included and DirecWay has 24 hour tech support, albeit shitty tech support.
    • I haven't tried SSH, but I can when I get home...
    The service isn't bad! We have five or six Windows PCs in my house and I feel we are very adequately supplied with bandwidth.
    --
    Do you love freedom??? Do you love freedom!!! DO YOU LOVE FREEDOM!!!!!!!!
  140. Use nebulink by shepd · · Score: 1

    It works in linux for free. And uses standard DVB equipment.

    Or use any other DVB internet provider. Forget about anyone using proprietary crap hardware. Stick with standards.

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  141. My experience by jkirby · · Score: 1

    I have been using Starband since it started. It had it issues in the past, but I have been very happy. I have friends who have DirecWay and they are not so happy. I also hear the new DirecWay hardware is better and their experiences may be different now.

    Starband has a new modem that has a 4 port switch and requires no special OS gateway software. I have it connect to a LinkSys RV082 router with multiple operating systems on the LAN side with no problems.

    Starband will give you up to 4 static IP addresses.

    Starband is extreamly reliable. If you are using the model 360 modem, you will surly want to have a dedicated gateway machine for sharing the Internet. I used XP with ICS until the model 460 model was released. Now I have no gateway, just the VSAT modem/router.

    Again, my experience is that it is very reliable. latency is bad; 700 to 2000 ms. I have seen downlaod speeds as fast a 1.25 MB per sec (no lie). I get 300K+ occasionaly, and 80K to 120K is normal. DOwnloads are very fast. VOIP and such stink. But, when it is all that you have, it is better than dial up.

    I have just had a T1 sent up here via 5 gig wireless link (there is a tower 6.79 miles away). I have found the satellite to be more reliable. Not as responsive, but far more reliable than wireless. This is why I have the new LinkSys RV082 router. It has two WAN ports to allow redundancy and load balancing between the two WAN connection; plus it has great VPN capabilities.

    --
    Jamey Kirby
  142. SpaceWay coming soon? by meheff · · Score: 1

    SpaceWay (the successor to DirecWay, I believe) is to start commercial service in 2004, or so says their web site. Any idea if this is a reality? The specs are much better. However, is it worth holding off getting DirecWay? Does anyone know when in 2004 this service might launch?

  143. If you do it by smoondog · · Score: 1

    Could you post your experiences on /.? I think it would be interesting to the community to get your first hand impressions.

    Thanks,

    -Sean

  144. Only good for browsing by dilyard · · Score: 0

    Direcway is alright for browsing but its not real useful for much else. They have a fair access policy which limits you to 206Mb down in a four hour period. If you exceed that limit, you won't have access until your average goes down (a few hours).

    SSH and VPN work over it, but the latency is pretty bad. I used both a great deal and rely on a dial-up connection for them if I'm doing anything involved. SSL is also tedious through it since it doesn't go through Direcway's proxy...

    FTP is pretty poor over it as well - especially if you're uploading. My 56K dial-up connection is about twice as fast for uploads as my Direcway service. Forget about online gaming.

    If you just want it for browsing and small downloads, its great. Otherwise, it is certainly not worth the expense. I had Roadrunner for 2 years before moving out to BFE and I'd say calling satellite internet "broadband" is false advertising.

    Check out BroadbandReports for more information

  145. DON'T DO IT!!!!! DIRECTWAY S(_)CKS!!! by AlanOfDale · · Score: 1

    I have been on Directway for the past year and a half. It is the worst thing I have ever seen. Spotty connections their filters sometimes won't let me connect to my web servers for updates. I haven't been able to use SSH. Stay on dial up You are better off.

    Thank GOD I am getting DSL in less than 2 weeks!

    --
    Can Smeg!!! Will Smeg!!!
  146. Another Option by charon79m · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you have decent cellular/PCS reception in the area, there are other terrestrial options that you might consider. The good people at Verison have a PCI card that gives you always on internet connection via their cellular netwok. Speeds and latency are pretty good. I saw download speeds at 300+Kb/s sustained and upload around 80Kb/s. Latency was around a 300ms on the hight end, and I used it to manage my box via SSH without issues. One consideration is that this option is geared toward a Windows enviroment and I do not know about linux support for it as it uses a propietry dialer client to connect. I've used Sprint's PCS service much the same; however, only with a PCMCIA card. I do not know if they have a PCI version of the card. Speeds/Latency were about the same and the same disclaimer applies concerning this being a Windows solution. Costs on these packages were $80/month for "unlimited" access (read contract for limitations on "unlimited"). Hope this helps! MrKnisely

  147. I had directway for a year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The service is horrible. You do get a gigantic gain in download speed, and a slight increase in upload speed. (12 kb a second.) You can't host a server on directway.

    The latency was so unbearable that I would get disconnected from AIM numerous times. Chatrooms did not work at all.

    Also, look at where your directv dish is pointed. If it's narrowly passing a tree, then forget about dway. They usually get you a directway dish with an added directv module.

    Since they have to aim one dish to get two signals, you get mediocre quality in both. During the spring and summer, sometimes this will become unusable. If this wasn't bad enough, the setup was a pain, and sometimes the modem locks up for no reason.

    Unless you absolutely, positively need high speed downloading, stick with dialup.

  148. DirecWay in middle-of-nowhere Iowa blows goats. by JPerler · · Score: 1

    Greetings;

    My wifes cousin switched from local 33.6k dialup to DirecWay satellite service some months ago, and while I can't speak for any other install of DirecWay, her connection is just utter shite.

    Marginally faster than 56k dialup (And I do mean marginally), overall I thought it was a rather embaressing example of an internet service daring to suggest it might be broadband or "High Speed".

    As usual, your mileage may vary;

  149. fake geek by IncohereD · · Score: 5, Informative

    No, a true geek would build their own rocket and launch their own communications satelite into a geo sync LEO

    A true geek would know that geosynchronus and low-earth orbits are two different things. Unless you want to load it with propellant constantly, which you really don't.

    1. Re:fake geek by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

      You can have geo sync LEO satellites... Otherwise you'd could put it into permanent orbit. Who wants that... now I can justify the constant rocket project in the garage ;-)

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    2. Re:fake geek by kfg · · Score: 1

      And if you're not working to a government/corporate spec you can actually make the bird out of scrounged electronics and a Pringles can.

      KFG

    3. Re:fake geek by IncohereD · · Score: 1

      You can have geo sync LEO satellites... Otherwise you'd could put it into permanent orbit. Who wants that... now I can justify the constant rocket project in the garage

      Okay, it's really hard to take your meaning from your contradictory, fractured grammar, but the point is that LOW earth orbits aren't high enough to achieve geosynchronicity (without thrust, anyway). LEOs are at 2000 km above earth. GSO's are more like 36 000 km out.

    4. Re:fake geek by Dashing+Leech · · Score: 1
      What's really funny about this conversation is that my brother, who works for National Defense, has seen a proposal for a project to develop a geosynchronous LEO satellite. Not that it was feasible. The proposal was from someone who wanted to have it but obviously didn't know squat about orbital mechanics.

      Of course, the project didn't get approval as soon as the techies saw it.

    5. Re:fake geek by orac2 · · Score: 1

      What's even funnier is that (in theory anyway) a geo-synchronous LEO is possible. The thing is that, technically, geosychronous does not automatically mean geostationary. Geo-stationary orbits are a common subset of geo-synchronous orbits. But (quoting now from the Cambridge Dictionary of Space Technology) a geo-synchronous orbit is: "An orbit whose period of rotation is some multiple or submultiple of the Earth's rotational period...a satellite in such an orbit will pass over the same point at a given time (or times) each day...Geostationary orbit is a special type of geosynchronous orbit."

      --
      "Just once, I'd like to meet an alien menace that wasn't immune to bullets." -- The Brigadier, Dr. Who
    6. Re:fake geek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No amount of thrust would get you a geosynchronous LEO, since technically satellites are constantly falling toward Earth and missing. The only reason they're missing the planet is because they're going so fast (the lower the orbit, the faster they go) so if you used thrust on the spacecraft to hold a LEO in a geosynchronous position they would quickly obtain a subterranean orbit. Unless, of course, you envisioned satellites hovering on a rocket for long periods of time.

    7. Re:fake geek by snowbike · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, LEO geosyncs are very easy. Everyone has one. In fact, most of the time, everyone is in a LEO (very LEO) geosync orbit. (mostly, hopefully we all move around in the orbit a bit). LEO geosync has very low launch costs--to get to the local elevation of ground. Or don't. Even if you stay in bed, you'll keep circling the earth once per day, locked in step with the globe as it goes around. The field of view isn't that large, but it keeps me entertained.

      I guess we all have a small amount of propellent we fire off every now and then, but for the most part, it is a pretty easy orbit to maintain.

    8. Re:fake geek by Dashing+Leech · · Score: 1

      Good point. To correct my previous post, it was indeed a geo-stationary LEO that was proposed.

  150. DirecWay Mail by ebcdicpb · · Score: 1
    Well, direcway's service is mostly good...

    But just hope they don't change smtp and pop3 servers. I worked @ a tech support shop last year, and one of our customers was using direcway when they decided to change e-mail servers. We [myself and peers] tried to contact direcway many, many times; sometimes on hold (valuable time spent playing quake3) for 5HRs.

    So to summerize: nice connection w/ good rates; but horrible service.

  151. DirectWay does great with SSH by jwnavagus · · Score: 1

    Is this the New DirectPC? I did the installation software for that. When I left the project, they had a switch that would go from [out 56k - in sat] to [out in 56k]. This way if you are browsing you use the great speed of satelite and for telnet/ssh/games you can use 56k both ways. James

    --
    slashdot@navagus.com
  152. Get a T1 and resell wireless by dcocos · · Score: 1

    For a very long time a lot of people in Northern Virginia couldn't get highspeed, and we live 10 minutes from WorldCom and AOL headquarters! What several of the tech savvy did was get a T1 for ~$450 a month and resell via 802.11b to their neighbors.

    1. Re:Get a T1 and resell wireless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      link?

    2. Re:Get a T1 and resell wireless by dcocos · · Score: 1

      a link to what?
      Here are some wireless ISP that I know of
      http://geekspeed.net
      http://restonwireless.co m
      http://uslinux.net/ {- This guy actually covers several miles!

  153. sound? I don't think so. by The+Darkness · · Score: 1
    Actually, radio waves aren't sound frequencies. They are Electro-Magnetic Radiation. Light is shorter wavelength EMR that we see with the naked eye.

    I suggest the NASA site as reading material.

    --
    There are two kinds of people: 1) those that need closure
  154. Re:snow by Booxbaum · · Score: 2, Informative

    Heavy snow and ice DO bother the DirecWay system. This is because water absorbes microwaves (this is how a microwave oven works), so the precipitation does effect it. I have not had much problem with rain, except in *real heavy* rain.

    Did I mention I will never purchase a DirecWay system again?

    just my 2 cents.

    --
    --- Boox
  155. Re:Got a T1 line to your house! TDS Metrocom by Havokmon · · Score: 1
    It might not be that expensive to drop a real T1.

    I think TDS Metrocom serves Michigan. I'm getting a 768k T1, with 5 business lines installed for $160/month. It's their XDATA plan, IIRC.

    My currently 1500/768 ADSL with 5 IP's is $105. Add to that my normal phone at $35, and I'm almost getting 4 additional lines for free.

    Not that I need 5 phone lines, but that's their requirement. Anyways, I have 4 kids, 2 of which are girls, I'm sure they're be used at some point ;)

    --
    "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
  156. Re:Weather related problems.. (in Michigan) by BlurryEyed · · Score: 1

    I live in Northern Michigan (Roscommon), and I have several clients that have/had DirecWay and snow *is* an issue. I have been called out just for the purpose of climbing on the roof and sweeping off the dish.
    Also, lag is a problem for more then just interactive programs. One insurance office used it to connect to the internet which is how they managed their customers on the home office's web page which was mostly text with small graphics for logos and such (like Slashdot...) It was sloooow. Think 3 sec DNS request, etc. I replaced it with a single 56k 3COM LanModem for a 5 person office and it was faster (for that situation)
    On the other hand, I have a real estate office that uses it to download photos of properties and they love it. (And they just came out with a device to allow you to connect without the need of a windows PC, just ethernet!)
    If you are still in Michigan, I would look at Wireless ISPs. They have their problems, I help manage one so I know, but they can get places where no one else can.

  157. Re:Cooking Spray by futuresheep · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Spray some PAM or other kind of cooking spray on your dish, it helped me with that exact issue greatly.

  158. Satelite Broadband modems article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get HomePower magazine this month and see the article about the editors life with satelite modems for the last 3 years. A good read with lots of insight. The only problem is you'll have to suffer throught the Mac stuff, kind of like MacHack all over again.

  159. I wouldn't use it by UGNS · · Score: 1

    I've got a friend that is using DirecWay as he is in a similar situation where cable & dsl are not availble in his area (way out in BFE)... He had told me though he had to go with the business class service so that he could SSH back into his network as it seems they firewall inbound traffic on the residential service. While I was staying with him for a day over X-mas I got to use the connection to check my email back home on the opposite coast and it was fairly slow, but not completely unusable just a bit tiresome.

  160. DNS by rs79 · · Score: 1

    You should be running a DNS server in house, and primary the root zone and have a decent sized cache. You're right in that DNS is a major part of all internet traffic (just look at what actually happens for one lousy web request some time, it's downright scary) but, since they're small but urgest requests it would make more sense to route these over a phone line than via the sat.

    Think of the sat as a 747. Really good for BIG things, but not so hot if you want to deliver a small package halfway across town really quickly.

    Squid and Opera help a lot too. Even with dialup :)

    --
    Need Mercedes parts ?
  161. do's and don'ts by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 1

    If you can get cable or DSL go that route. If you can't then the Dish is decent.

    The only outages I had with it in the past year was during a particulary sever thunderstorm, and when my girlfriend left her radar detector on in my driveway.

    Yes, it's a common problem, and the tech support was pretty helpful in diagnosing - for some reason some detectors can bring down the connection.

    If you're looking to use it on a lan - beware - when it's running good it's great, but occasionally some of the pc's "lose" a connection and you have to run an ipconfig /release ipconfig /renew to get it back up.

    You'll have to use direcways software to config for the way they do packets - they have a tool to run on all the pc's to modify them to talk thru the satellite.

    Lastly - be aware you're fupped on a satellite. if you go to download over 140 meg in one shot - you get throttled to less than 1k under their "Fair Use Policy".

    --
    _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
  162. My experience (posted over DirecWay) by cruachan · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm in Europe - Scottish Highlands - and have been running on satellite for 18 months. I'm using the earlier DirecWay DW4000 system - marketed under a different company reseller here (Bridge Broadband), but still the same thing underneath.

    I've found satellite excellent. It's got pluses and minuses compared to 'normal' broadband, but so long as you understand what you're dealing with then it's a really good choice. In fact if I moved back to an area with cable broadband I'd be very tempted to take this dish with me and stick to satellite.

    Good things

    * Generally there's no problem with contention ratios. I'm contracted for a 512Kb pipe and that's what I get whenever I demand it. Having hear horror stories of cable broadband being slower than dialup because of the contentiion ratios piled on (20:1 +) it's nice to have a fat'ish pipe to yourself. This is probably the single best thing about satellite. (OK, I know there must be contention management somewhere, but I've never seen it).

    * Cost. Although upfront costs are high, and running costs not cheap, you do have all that pipe to do what you will with. I've got cable laid to my three neighbours, who I charge 'normal broadband' rates to, so the ongoing cost works out the same, if not slightly cheaper, than cable broadband. Some vendors don't let you do this while others smile benignly on it so check.

    * Easy upgrade - if you need more bandwidth the Hughes system can generally give it to you with little or no kit changes. 512Kb is enough for me, but it's nice to know that could increase several times.

    * Reliable - reliability seems excellent. True there's the occassional glitch like any system, but because everybody is going through the same earth station problems tends to effect everyone at once so they really pull their finger out. I've found with systems based on local exchanges that if something goes down because only a few'ish local people are effected it can take days to fix.

    Bad things

    * Ping times are unavoidably long. Around 900ms for most destinations as against 250ms for cable. However this is less of a problem than you'd expect for most things. Web browsers can be tweaked to grab more items in parallel - so total page load time is no different, and downloads/streaming media etc it doesn't matter if you're just a second or so later once it starts. However most games are out and video-conferencing is doubtful (I'm told the system can be optomised to make it possible though but not tried)

    * You can get outages in very heavy rain under very thick cloud. This is pretty rare but does happen - but generally it's obvious what the problem is so having a beer for half an hour until the heavy rain passes is a fine solution. Also occassionally had problems in blizzards from a build up of snow on the transmitter.

    * Some services occassionaly don't like satellite. For example I quite often find ftp upload is much slower than expected. This may have something to do with the way satellite doesn't transmit/recieve a continous stream of IP packets but collects them together to transmit as larger 'frames'.

    Bottom line. Unless you find the ping time problem a killer issue then satellite is a really good rural solution. Like all engineering it helps if you have some understanding and 'machine
    sympathy'

    1. Re:My experience (posted over DirecWay) by cruachan · · Score: 1

      Follow up - been reading down posts below and see several comments about the FAP limits on DirecWay.

      Have to say I've never seen a problem, but I'm running under a 'Business' contract not a 'Home' one (~$160 p.m.). I think the FAP limit on that is about 650Mb per day. Of course European availability may differ from the States too - Hughes here seem to keep lobbing satellites up left right and centre.

  163. Catalyst Wireless? by chriswaco · · Score: 2

    Taco,

    Have you tried looking up Catalyst Wireless here in Ann Arbor? They have (or had) an antenna on the 777 building at Eisenhower & State, so if you're within a few miles of that you should be able to get a 512Kbps connections.

    If that doesn't work, a T1 will cost you about $125-250 per month plus internet access, or about $400 per month if you don't abuse it.

    It's deductible, of course. :-)

  164. "professional" installation by SirTwitchALot · · Score: 1

    These systems may require Pro installation, but if you saw some of the guys doing this, you'd know it's not that big of a deal. After I saw the crackhead (quite literally, I'm not poking fun) who installed my coworkers Starband system I decided to get certified myself. It didn't cost me anything, Took me about two hours, and now I'm certified to install these things. Plus if you install your own system, you make a commission on the money you pay for your service. Take a look at http://training.starband.com/html_files/installati on_training.htm

    --
    Go away, or I will replace you with a very small shell script.
  165. w00t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    go ann arbor, thats my hometown right there

  166. Great! by vjmurphy · · Score: 1

    " I'm aware of the game crippling latency, but that's not a huge deal to me."

    You can join my Half-Life server any time!

    --
    Vincent J. Murphy
    Spandex Justice
  167. I have been using this for years by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1

    I have had Direcway for years. The biggest drawback is the bandwidth limitations. If you download more than 420M within 4 hrs, they shut you down for 4 hours. It made downloading Redhat9 a painful experience. I had to use leechftp & limit myself to 12k....ugh.

    --
    Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
  168. sprint changed their TOS several months ago by jbellis · · Score: 1

    using Sprint Vision as a data line for your computer is now verbotten. So far they're mostly adopting a "don't ask, don't tell" policy towards the occasional infraction but they definitely dump anyone who tries to use it 24/7. How much is too much, nobody really knows.

    1. Re:sprint changed their TOS several months ago by BigJimSlade · · Score: 1

      I'm curious if it can only dial up when needed. My parents live in an area where satellite and dial-up are the only option, but a Sprint tower is actually 2 miles down the road.

    2. Re:sprint changed their TOS several months ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use Sprint dialup exclusively for my home internet connection.

      I switched over from a 20 per month dial up internet, 60 dollar per month phone bill, and 40 doller per month cell bill for one 75 bill through sprint (with all taxes). (I get unlimited high speed internet, with the caveats noted below, unlimited local and long distance). One point of failure though if any serious problems, so I also have a 4$ a month product replacement insurance. I have already used it once. All data can be backed up, so switching back is not a hassle.

      Pros and cons:

      1. unlimited Internet access costs 15$ per month for most plans. I have used it on average of 3 to 4 hours a day. sometimes more. (no problems with ammount of time or ammount downloaded yet.)

      2. my usb connection does not charge while running, giving me 3 to 4 hours of constant uptime before swapping batteries (I am using a Sanyo-5300 phone)

      3. speed average 115kb/s. I've seen it peak at 130 or more rarely.

      4. you need to keep the connection 'live'. for example running a p2p program in the background consistantly 'pings' the network and towers to keep the connection alive (I have tried ping -t and samspade as less intensive alternatives to keeping connection up but neither keep the connection going like shareazza.
      What happens if you do not keep the connection running as described above, the connection will simply get dropped to 1kb/s or slower after a few minutes of inactivity. and most times it will just looses the connection outright.

      5. Most web images appear jagged and distorted. Confirmed with both Sprint and Datavis (makers of the internet connection software/ cable bundle I use to connect.) The nature of mobile data throughput directly alters images. (mostly they look low-res, anything with transparency gets severly mangled.)

      Its not for everybody, but if you can live with a few hoops to jump through it can be a less expensive alternative.

  169. Latency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You really don't understand what latency is, do you?

    A lot of people don't. Especially managers. That's why the telecom engineering department at my last workplace deployed negative latency inducers. Similar to echo cancellers, negative latency inducers (NLI's as they're called in the telco world) sample the link and use forward-anticipating logic circuits to calculate an appropriate future datagram. Low cost units run about $125K a pair (though there are rumors of a sourceforge project and can snip out about 250 ms -- making VoIP over international telco links much more possible.

    Doubled back to back and then some (in a manner similar to plugging a G.729 stream into another G.729 codec to double your voice compression and get 64:1 type ratios), you can get latency reductions of 1000 ms and greater. However, you have to be careful about employing too much NLI on domestic circuits - especially on voice over IP traffic - otherwise you'll get a party being heard on the remote end of the phone before they talk, and that can get confusing!

    (Believe it or not, management bought this explanation... *sigh*)

  170. There is a catch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem with install is not the reception of the signal it is the uplink. The tuning specs for your uplink are much stricter than the reception. If the dish is not aligned right you can fry the Bird. This is why it is required the have a pro do the install. At one point in the begining training for this was free to try and get enough installers with the right skills.

  171. Issues with DirecPC/Starband by chill · · Score: 2, Informative

    A friend of mine live just out of reach from cable-modem/DSL. He's five miles away from my house (cable modem).

    In the last month, he's spent more time connecting to my wireless net or going to Starbucks for T-Mobile's wireless net, than at home.

    The melting snow is a bitch on the connection (Spokane, WA).

    SSH is painful for any interactive work. Latency is a pain and games are shot. Bandwidth caps mean you aren't going to be grabbing 3-disk .iso sets very often.

    While it can take a bit to disrupt the DOWNWARD signal, it is much easier to screw your UPLINK signal to the point it doesn't work. Thus, TV is less affected than internet connections.

    However, if you have no other option, it beats dialup. It depends, though. Are you far enough out that the phone lines are crap and you are getting 14.4-28.8 dial in? Or are you just in a good area but without DSL/cable?

    If the latter, look for an ISP that will allow you to bond two dialup links. Get two phone lines and two modems and get them to bond into one link. Also check out ISDN, though it may be expensive.

    -Charles

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  172. Other interference? by at_kernel_99 · · Score: 1

    The weather discussion is interesting, as I'm in Minnesota. My other question is regarding other interference. I live near a major airport. Sometimes I get TV interference from aircraft flying overhead. This behavior is inconsistent; i.e. I do not get interference from all flights or on all days. My suspicion is that is has to do with whether the overflying aircraft are using radar or not; but have no proof.

    If I go with satellite, I would be directly north of this airport by about 2 miles. In other words, the dish will point to the south, directly over the airport. Should I expect interference?

  173. FAP by R_Harrold · · Score: 1

    A few years back I was on the DirecTV Internet Service (don't recall what it was named then) and there was a particularly sneaky bit involved. They had a mysterious threshold for data transfered, beyond which they throttled your sat. connection down to something less than dialup. The support folks claimed to have no way of telling if you had passed the threshold and the threshold was not disclosed (they also did not discolose how long it took to get 'in the clear again'). They would refer you to their 'Fair Access Policy' and that would be it. Fortunately I moved somewhere where I could get a high speed wired connection. Robert H

  174. Why not try Dial-up ISDN? by bin2gray · · Score: 1

    I'm in a similar situation and got an ISDN line from my teleco. The service is about $90/month (SBC), and provides 2 64K channels. I use it both for my phone and internet connection. Internet is 64K that bursts to 128K when the phone is not in use. ISDN router/terminal adapter can be had for about $200. It is not DSL but I was very surprised how much better even the 64K ISDN is to a "56K" dial-up. 128K ISDN is all you need unless you want to download lots of music or movies. -Brent

    1. Re:Why not try Dial-up ISDN? by bin2gray · · Score: 1

      I just noticed you said ISDN was not availible in your area. My bad. Are you sure ISDN is not an option for you? I'm way out in the boonies and can get it. -Brent

  175. Ann Arbor Area Alternative by Rayooz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Rob, I too live just outside Ann Arbor in Saline. In my area there is no DSL or cable either.

    A guy in my neighborhood has a T1 to his house and sells service off it for $35/month, using Motorola's Canopy. he can get up to a 10 mile radius, so it's possible that you're within range.

    As a result, you get 1.5Mbps (shared) upstream AND downstream, which is better than most cable service. It's been very reliable, and cheaper than cable too.

    Anyone who's interested, drop me a note and I can give you the info.

    --
    Chikli Consulting LLC - http://agileshrugged.com
    1. Re:Ann Arbor Area Alternative by MrCam · · Score: 1

      I heard...second hand mind you from a Real Estate agent in Saline that if you ask the phone company if they have DSL they say no. Because they don't offer the service, but there are ISP's near Saline that offer DSL for the Saline area. You just have to call around. (I can't remember the name of the exact ISP that the agent found)

    2. Re:Ann Arbor Area Alternative by Rayooz · · Score: 1

      I called around to just about every ISP I could find that services my area ... no dice. This was in early fall, so I suppose they might have something now, but I think the deal I'm getting is still better =)

      --
      Chikli Consulting LLC - http://agileshrugged.com
    3. Re:Ann Arbor Area Alternative by Man_Holmes · · Score: 1

      I would definitely consider wi-fi before I would satellite. With the right antenna you can reliably get 10 mile reception.

      If there isn't anyone within 10 miles consider getting a T-1 and becoming the neighborhood ISP.

      O'Reilly has a great book on building community networks that was just updated.

      http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/wirelesscommnet2/

      Man Holmes

  176. Do multilink PPP with multiple modems. by kcurrie · · Score: 1

    I once accidentally bought a house "out in the sticks" (Osgoode, ON) where I couldn't even get ISDN (which I had while living in Ottawa). I grabbed a 486 that had 2 serial ports, added a serial card and put 3 56K modems on it. When I called Bell and asked for 3 additional phone lines they had to run a new wire from the curb to my house. On the 2 lines that ran across the connection I got 48K connections to the office (connecting to a Cisco AS5300). Note that I asked for 3 additional lines, and I already had one being used for voice. After multiple attempts they were unable to get all 4 lines working (they'd disable other ones, etc,etc) and I gave up on 3 modems, settling for only 2. ..anyway, using multilink PPP on a 2.1 series kernel worked perfectly, and it seems due to the modems compression I was often getting better apparent speeds than I was on ISDN. Using (compressed) SSH across such a configuration was nearly the same as being in the office-- no problems at all. Of course the SSH's compression and modems compression didn't help each other, but I'd bet SSH compressed the data far more than the modem would have anyway. Pages with lots of text just flew down.
    I had the system configured to keep 1 line up all the time, and when there was traffic it'd dial on demand the other line, and keep it up for ~45 minutes before dropping due to inactivity.

    IIRC, the total cost (to me, anyway) was around $18*2)= $36/month for the phone lines + hardware of course.

    BTW, I'd also tried multilink PPP on Windows (95 at the time) with equally good results.

    --
    -- I speak only for myself.
  177. GO BLUE! by pitdingo · · Score: 1

    GO BLUE!!! Big Ten Champions!!!!!!!!!

  178. DirecWay DW6000: What to expect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    Disclaimer: I work for a company that installs these and have had the pleasure of messing with far too many of these on-site with an irate customer at my elbow and a clueless tech support rep in my ear.

    DirecWay now offers the DW6000, which appears to be an operating system agnostic router for satellite internet access.

    It is agnostic, so you shouldn't have any problems running Linux, OS X, BeOS, Windows, whatever. Instead of 2 units+software it's all integrated into the same system, a box that's about 2x as big as a cable router would be but with cool blue LEDs. Ethernet port in the back, you can set up DHCP on the router or disable it if you prefer (so you can use something else or just use static, whatever).

    I already use DirecTV, so this might work well.

    You won't get any kind of discount. However, you *may* be able to buy a kit (ask whether you need a kit A, B, or C) to consolidate your programming on the DirecWay dish. If you have local channels or already have a dual or multisat dish, then you're going to need to keep your DirecTV dish for TV. If you can manage to use the DirecWay dish for TV as well, then you'll be less susceptible to rain-fade.

    I'm aware of the game crippling latency, but that's not a huge deal to me. The monthly price seems reasonable, but is there a catch?

    Yeah, a couple of big fat catches. Tech support is absolutely abysmally bad. The worst tech support I've experienced in 22 years in the IT industry. In addition, you're limited to 165MB of bandwidth per day - if you exceed that then you'll be throttled way the hell down until your quota is built back up.

    I'm abusing my power as Slashdot editor to ask for experiences with this (or similiar) services. Does it bog down during the day? Not work with common hardware? Hidden costs?

    That's okay - if I wasn't posting this anonymously I'd be in a heap of trouble. Hidden costs would be if you need a tech to come back out to troubleshoot your system. For surfing it's pretty damned quick (lots of caching going on via back-end). Not had it bog down except when bandwidth was exceeded.

    However, sometimes there will be trouble with a transponder on a bird which will knock a bunch of people off for days (unless you want to repoint your dish, have the NOC okay your move to another bird - long, long hassle). Of course, rain-fade or very heavy overcast will kick you offline.

    Does it cost a fortune for the required professional installation?

    No, you have to be a certified installer to put the thing in. But the cost of the install is supposed to be included in the cost of the system, though (depending on market, etc) you may pay $199 for a standard install. If you need a wallfish or have a long run of cable (couple of hundred feet) then you'll have to pay extra.

    Is ssh completely unusable?

    I don't know - you'll have to adjust your latency thresholds so your apps don't time you out before you get a response from the server you're trying to download from (FTP). Haven't tried SSH over one of these.

    Everything said and done, DirecWay is a damned sight better than rural dialup ever will be. Most of the time, you'll love the system. Odds are you won't experience many problems; however, when you do they'll be a royal pain to get fixed. So, keep dialup as a fall-back.

    You'll find surfing and emailing to rule. Not so much with anything else, though. Oh, if you need a static IP, expect to pay another $30 a month. Also, if you have an older DirecWay system, you can probably upgrade to the DW6000 for $100 ('cause it's so much easier to troubleshoot).

  179. Something to check into by xcrawfordx · · Score: 1

    I have had numerouse co-workers switch to DirectWay, and the only issue they have had was with certain VPN clients. They can't make the connection. All the rest of the issues with service are typical gripes with DirecTV (As you probably already have with your Dish TV.)

  180. DirecWay is not good for interactive sessions by d00fy · · Score: 1

    My Pops has DirecWay in S.C. On 2 separate occasions I've gone down and tried to work remotely using Terminal Services and SSH. Both are very sluggish to the point where they are unusable, I've looked at the icmp round trips and they are often 500-2000ms. Both times I unhooked my laptop from the RJ45 and got on dial-up at 28.8Kb/s which was better.

  181. past user of the service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In a word - variable. The download speeds can go as low as 28k all the way upto 1.2 Mbs.There is a quota that they don't tell you about and if memory serves it is 120mbs per day. Make sure you are provisioned on a newer satellite other wise you will go crazy between 4 and 8 PM.
    Severe weather will affect you but 95% of the time it is useable. Make sure that the system is grounded or you will be resetting it every couple of hours.
    BTW if you want to buy the equipment from me email me at snoopy456 at hotmail.you know the rest. We finally got cable in our town.

  182. EDGE? by halo1982 · · Score: 1

    AT&T Wireless has nationwide rollout of EDGE (highspeed wireless data...faster than Verizon or Sprints) and at 250 for the card and $80 a month for service (unlimited) it might be worth looking into...i think its supposed to max out at something like 384kb and on average do around 160kb. Anyway if you have ATTWS GSM service in your area that might be something to check out or try..(aircard + adapter for computer? ehh probably no linux tho)

  183. DirecWay user for 2 yrs - mostly satisfied by Goldenhawk · · Score: 2, Informative

    My personal experiences...

    Latency sucks. I'm actively looking for an alternate (I can't get DSL, I can't get wireless, I can't get two-way cable). But I will say that DirecWay is MUCH better than a modem - in most cases.

    Latency is not so much a problem for browsing, surprisingly, because if you're used to a modem, you wait longer by far for content to arrive. With the DirecWay software running (on a 3000/4000 box), or with the 6000 system, the thing is smart enough to ask for all the subitems on a page at once, so once the stuff starts arriving, it gets there pretty fast.

    The real problem with latency, surprisingly, is EMAIL. As you know, it's a challenge/reply system, where it's necessarily linear - you can't multitask it. So every step takes 2 seconds - which means for checking about five POP3 mailboxes with a dozen saved messages each, and downloading a dozen new messages, can take upwards of 3 or 4 minutes. I usually hit my email button, walk away, and come back later. And when I'm home, I just leave it running all the time. Not worrying about dialing up is sweet.

    Same thing with FTP - if you manage a web site, like I do, it can be REALLY painful working with FTP, since the linear nature of THAT transaction is also very slow with high latency connections. Uploading or downloading a hundred small files totalling 100K takes well near forever (10-20 minutes), even though you could do it over ethernet in a second or two.

    Finally, browsing any secure site is very slow - since the system doesn't do its magic compression / multi-request with https. So there's really no browsing acceleration there. So each image, or .js file, or whatever, comes in with a 2 second lag. For complex sites (which is MOST commercial sites with https connections) it can be pretty slow. I simply use Mozilla's "block images from this server" trick most of the time.

    Uploading anything is REALLY REALLY REALLY SLOW. You're better off uploading over a modem - no kidding. I usually see 2.8k upload speeds. Much worse than I used to see with a modem with decent software compresssion. And that's WITH DrTCP optimizations applied. Since I market software and must download 10Mb installers to my web site regularly, I've learned to just start them at bedtime, and check it in the morning to be sure it finished.

    Downloading large files is amazing - nothing to complain about - 10 Mb downloads are painless and I don't even think twice about requesting them anymore, even via email.

    I personally haven't yet hit the FAP limit once. So I have no complaints about the capping. Of course, I'm not downloading full Linux installs or anything - just an occasional 10 or 20Mb demo installer for some software. And I don't traffic in MP3s or other multimedia.

    Installation was quite easy - I have a friend who's an installer, and he gave me the mount and cable ahead of time, so I ran my own cable and did the mount the way I like it (lots of roofing tar, extra heavy lag bolts, etc.) I couldn't do the dish install because of the FCC requirements, but after my own pre-installation, my friend was able to get the dish mounted and pointed within about 10 minutes. No problem. Be sure to account for TWO RG6QS cables - not just one - to carry both the send and receive modems.

    I have had some difficulty with the "commissioning" - where the receiver downloads the adapter keys - when I turn the thing off for a week while I'm out of town, it typically takes an hour or two before it's up and running again. That can be very irritating while it's resolved.

    As with other posters, I've only had a few instances of rain fade, and usually very brief.

    I've never had a real problem with tech support - they're usually slow to answer the phone but once I get a person we usually have the problem resolved fairly quickly. There was one exception where the guy must have been from Pakistan, couldn't really speak English, and obviously didn't want to hear what I had to say, was just reading a scrip

    --
    --Brandon / Split Infinity Music

    1. Re:DirecWay user for 2 yrs - mostly satisfied by srvivn21 · · Score: 1

      I also maintain websites over a high-latency link, and find that it often takes less time to make a .zip (or a .tar.gz) file, upload that one file, and uncompress it on the far end compaired to uploading a host of little files.

      Not sure if you have the capability of doing that on the far end (no shell access web host), but it's a real sanity saver.

  184. Please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have Dish Network at my house in Florida. When it rains hard, you can forget about watching TV. Sometimes it will even go out in a light rain (most of the time it stays on). Of course, my system is about 3 years old, so maybe they have improved upon the hardware by now.

    1. Re:Please. by jridley · · Score: 1

      Try re-aiming the antenna. My system is over 5 years old, and it was getting pretty flaky, dropping in light rains as you say. I figured it couldn't hurt to re-aim. It was 10 degrees off. I found out one of the kids had hit it with a basketball and tilted it the previous year, gee, just about when it started getting flaky.

      At 42* north, I'm getting 87% signal. In Florida you should get 90+.

  185. Direcway by StormReaver · · Score: 1

    I live in the sticks where satellite is currently the only possible form of broadband available, despite living less than five miles from a local ISP. Wireless is still not an option because of the tall hills and signficant woodage between me and the ISP (and Mandrake dies hard whenever I plug in my USB wireless cards).

    I had three separate dialup accounts (one for each person in the house), which ran between $40-$60 a month depending on the ISP.

    The initial $200 setup fee was waived by DirecWay both for the initial one-way installation (which cost me $200 for the equipment), and the two-way DW 4000 upgrade (which cost me $400 just for the transmitter).

    I had to commit to a year of service with the two-way, and it required a Windows box to act as the household Internet server. The Windows-based server reduced the satellite capabilities by roughly 25-30 percent over what it provided directly to the Windows machine. It is excruciatingly painful under these circumstances, which is why I had cancelled it a year ago (after my contract expired).

    I recently signed back up after finding out about the DW 6000 (which has yet to arrive), and after my dialup provider had one outage too many. The cost of finding another dialup provider for three dialup connections was just a few dollars short of the satellite service.

    The service with the DW 6000 is on a monthly billing cycle (no long term commitments), and I get a $100 rebate when I send back my current DW 4000 modems (gladly!). I would have gotten another $100 rebate if I agreed to the 15-month commitment (I will never do such a foolish thing as getting locked into a multi-month agreement again). I pay $65/month since I own the hardware outright.

    I visit a small number web sites, so most images are cached in Konqueror. Site like Slashdot load faily quick, though the latency is definitely noticable. I unplug everything during thunderstorms, so signal interference from storms in a non-issue. I have maintained an 84 signal strength in a blizzard (30+ is the minumum needed), and the run of the mill local heavy rains and snow have had zero effect on my signal.

    My largest single-session downloads have been the SUN JDK + docs (~50 megs) and FlightGear (78 megs). I have never been FAP'd, as I don't download ISOs (I buy all my distributions directly from Mandrake). I download lots of little things, usually under a meg each, and only a few large things over 10 megs.

    My only problems stem from that fuckin' Windows Box(TM) acting (poorly) as the gateway. This will go away when the DW 6000 arrives. I haven't tried in in the context of a VPN (my workplace uses a Symantec VPN, which I don't think is Linux compatible), but that would just be icing on the cake rather than an actual need. I also don't play online games, so that's not a problem.

    The bottom line is that the satellite is a great deal for a family of three sharing the connection. Except for that Fuckin' Windows Box(TM), it beats dialup by a wide margin for my house.

  186. Not a good idea. by infiniter · · Score: 1

    My father has DirecWay, and it's not a good idea for a professional. It's not networkable, has awful low points during business hours, and goes out whenever it rains, snows, or is unusually cloudy. plus leaves break it till you get them off the dish.

  187. About your journal entry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and comment about 'mule' accounts:

    You can't moderate a comment made by someone with the same IP... It mainly forbids you to moderate your own posts created with another id, since the odds of having the past-IP of someone you want to moderate is low...

    ~SavingPrivateNawak

  188. Money Pit by BlueDraco · · Score: 1

    If its the only option you can get, it is better then dialup in a few ways. People with remote linux boxes should note that the latency makes it near impossible to do anything in a remote shell since you'll have to wait about 2 seconds for a response to any key you type. Also, if you dish gets out of alignment, you'll have to pay about $150 for them to come out and re-point it. If you get the installer that I got you'll want to stay far far away from this product.

  189. Perhaps create your own ISP? by Omega1045 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    If IDSL is not available (my previous suggestion), you might check on getting a simple T1 to your house. Another friend of mine in rural Iowa ordered a T1, then bought some Cisco Aironet equipment w/ the big antennae. He provides high-speed "no tech support" Internet service to a few of his closest neighbors to help reduce the cost of the T1. At $20/neighbor, he managed to pay off his equipment and is now making enough money to upgrade equipment.

    If I recall, he bought a regular desktop PC and put Linux on it. I think he put a proxy server on it to help cut down on the traffic. I know he got a domain and put up SMTP/POP to provide email for his neighbors. I don't think he is doing any port 80 traffic.

    --

    Great ideas often receive violent opposition from mediocre minds. - Albert Einstein

  190. Re:I'm happy with it...except for tech support by demachina · · Score: 1

    There is one down side with DirecWay I forgot to mention. I had real problems trying to subscribe to some email lists like Bugzilla at moziila.org and Bugtraq. Their email server would reject the confirmation emails for some reason. A guy at Mozilla sent me the exact log entry when the confirmation was rejected. It might be their spam filters, though I checked their filter list and saw no evidence it would reject these reputable sites. I suspect there is just something screwy in how there email server handles these slightly atypical emails.

    I spent something like 16 hours on the phone to their tech support. At least 90% of it appears to be in India, all the front line support is. It is a case study in how horrible outsourcing tech support can be. They are just sitting there ready canned FAQ's and if your problem isn't in the FAQ you will never get a resolution. It was pretty clear the people I talked to weren't even basicly literate in using a browser, email or the net. I demanded to talk to a manager, he assured me he would escalate the issue. I never hear back, I call back and am on the line for a few more hours and it finally became obvious they assigned the bug to "needs further review" and it never was resolved. I wager a skilled email admin could have at least explained the problem in a few minutes if I had ever got through to one and their email server clearly appears to have a bug in it.

    I had to use a FREE yahoo email for the lists that I couldn't get subscribed through Direcway. It worked without a hitch on the confirmation mails.

    --
    @de_machina
  191. Maybe One Day Ecuador... by Milican · · Score: 1

    Man, it sure would be nice if these services were available in Ecuador. I went there over the summer and the best connections I could get out of my aunt and uncle's house was about 14.4k. If I could get high speed access in Ecuador then I could telecommute to work in Dallas, TX... that would be to say the least "kick ass".

    JOhn

  192. Used Starband for 3 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    its the other 2 way satellite broadband setup, associated with Dish instead of DirectTV.
    After 3 years I was finally able to switch to DSL.
    Consumer 2 way satellite service is more expensive and slower than any other broadband alternative (DSL, cable modem), but better than dialup. If dialup is your only alternative, and you can afford Direcway or Starband, go for it. Latency is high (that darn speed of light matters when the hub is in geosync orbit), upload is MUCH lower bandwidth than download, and a proxy cache definitely helps, but it is always on and has much better download bandwidth than a 56K modem.

    Bob

  193. Remote locations by Pedrito · · Score: 1

    When I was living outside of a small town in Arkansas, I had this same problem. I considered DirecWay but eventually decided not to because of all the downsides involved.

    What's really strange is I moved to a small town in Mexico and my options are Dialup, DSL, Cable and wireless. If they can manage that in a small Mexican town, why not a small American town? That's what I can't figure out. Granted, the small Mexican town is about 10 times as populous as the small American town I was living in, but in most ways, it's also 10 times as backwards.

    If I were you, I'd talk to your neighbors and collaborate on getting a real connection for your neighborhood like some of the other stories we've seen on that.

  194. More DirecPC Issues by frenztech · · Score: 1

    My housemates and I had several issues with a DirecPC system. (We had both upload and download via the dish, they also have upload via modem, which might be better.)

    1. Latency was usually around 600ms. While this might not be bad for downloading, since the actual speed once the download started was great, it did make for a very annoying web experience. Often times we could dialup to a local provider at a 33.6kbps connection and connect to websites faster.
    I think this was because every request takes 600ms at least, and some webpages require many requests, etc. The upload via modem might fix this issue.
    2. We had problems with the USB interface. It was the only one available to the system at that time. It would often just drop off and we would have to reboot to continue. (We were running it on a windows box because they did not have any bsd/linux drivers.)
    3. Our service was down many times over the course of the six month period we had it. Several times this was for period of a couple of weeks at a time. I found this to be unacceptable.

    I'd try the uploading via modem if you have that option.

    --
    "Sed Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes?" -Juvenal
  195. Starband by clheiny · · Score: 1
    I use Starband (a DirecWay competitor). The only other option where I live is 30K (on a good day) dialup.

    I don't use games or interactive video, so can't comment on the latency issues there - just plain surfing the latency is not generally a problem. Personally, I can handle a .25 sec delay between a click and the time the download starts. If that's not quick enough for you, maybe it's time to cut down on the caffiene :-).

    File downloads are really fast, with no FAP. However, uploads are severely limited in terms of speed - big attachments can take a long time to send.

    Streaming audio works adequately for KPIG, Nascar races (including all their fancy applets), and hockey games.

    I was warned strongly that the system was very weather sensitive, but have experienced no significant problems due to weather on my end, and only a couple or three outages due to severe thunderstorms at Starband's Florida ground station.

    My employer's Windows-based VPN system does not work over Starband, but they warned me about that upfront. I don't know if it's a latency thing or they're just blocking the ports for some reason. No biggy, since my work travels well on a USB flash drive. SSH works - I use it to contact SourceForge and other places.

    I use an old P-II system running WinProxy on Win98 to connect to the Starband modem. The P-II is connected to a Linksys wireless gateway, and my home network lives behind that.

    --
    Racing is an addiction that makes heroin look like a vague hankering for something crunchy.
  196. Satellite Internet SUCKS, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Satellite Internet SUCKS, but it is slightly better than dialup. After living through 56k for too many years, and not having any broadband in my area, I finaly broke down and spent $1000 for a year of DirecWay. (Hardware + 1 year of service.)
    Browsing the web is about the same speed as a 56k (after you take the latency into effect). SSL is completely unusable (too many small packets sent back and forth, which you don't want with high late4ncy.
    Upload on mine was typically worse than with dialup (25 to 30k up). The only place it pays off is downloading large files. In that case, I got far better than the advertised 400k down. more like 2000.
    If you have ANY OTHER always on connection choices... take it instead. If you rarely pull down large files, there is little point in switching from 56k.

  197. Re: Complicated Software by pegr · · Score: 1

    "...unlike the DW4000 that has separate transmit and receive modems stacked together and linked by a 24-pin serial cord."

    Kringe! I think they mean "unlike the DW4000 that has separate transmit mo(dulate) and receive dem(odulate) stacked together..."

    ;) Hey, my mo is fine, but I think my dem is busted!

  198. Isn't so bad with no alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some of the things covered here are correct. Ping times suck (800-1000ms), upload sucks, downloads rock. BUT, there is FAP More info can be found at the Broadband Reports Sat. Forum and a guide for tweaking your network is at tweakhound An example of a statstics someone is getting today, 2004-01-26 07:15:03 EST: 1726 / 32 Your download speed : 1726359 bps, or 1726 kbps. A 210.7 KB/sec transfer rate. Your upload speed : 32325 bps, or 32 kbps. Your upstream result was very slow! .. not good Seems like broadband .. above the 1mbit barrier!

  199. small VSAT experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had Starband about 2 years ago. To be blunt, it sucked. It was unreliable, intermittent, and some things just didn't work. Anything interactive or using a lot of round trips was nearly impossible. This includes email. The smtp and pop3 protocols do a lot of round trips. They had special accellerators for http and ftp to eliminate the round trips and do things in larger "batches". But this was buggy. And if you exceeded the download quota, then it got very slow.

    I dropped starband when I found an ISP that would let me "bond" two dialups, as this was better service for me.

    If you have server space somewhere, you can set up your own compressing proxy, and probably do better than a small VSAT.

  200. Directway experience by TheHawke · · Score: 1

    The model 6000 modem/router handles DHCP in a odd way and cannot be shut off.. to be able to use fixed IP addressing you would have to get ahold of a better router and hook the 6000 into it. Then rework the router to your heart's content.

    Professional installation is free, unless the installer has to get atop of a roof, then there maybe a fee for him to do so.

    My personal experience with one was with a client that had a DW6000 installed due to the wireless being shut down in the area (1500/mo for a T1, thanks verizon). The installer did a sloppy job installing it, putting a small portion of the dish under the eave (or overhang) of the roof, which mangled the signal and could not get a signal over 60%. He called me up to come out to check it out and discovered the discrepancy, then tried to call the installer to get him back out there. That jackal never returned any calls made by both me and the client! Talk about piss poor customer relations. I called up a fellow installer that is as reliable as the sun and moon, got him out there, and proceeded to pick up the pieces that the previous jerk left behind.

    We managed to get the signal up to 75% due to the location of the dish and proceeded to install a wireless system, using linksys gear. Haven't had a problem since.

    When your installer completes his work, make him sit down with you before you sign the paperwork, CONFIRM that the cables are not kinking or the crimps appear that they may fall apart at any time. and go through the system diagnostics with your browser and MAKE SURE that your signal is a solid 80% or higher! It should not wobble more than a percentage point.. If it does then there is something obstructing the dish and the object would need to be removed or relocated.

    IF you get someone that appears that he did not do his work properly, get his DirecWay/DirecTV installer number and call it in to customer service. REQUEST that another tech come out to set things to right, on their nickle even!!

    --
    First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
  201. Latency on Sat.... by theMaab · · Score: 1

    My Brother-in-law recently had the 'Two way' Satallite internet at his office.

    He experienced very high latency. The connection was fast, never seemed to slow down, but was very latent.

    The only time he saw the latency was playing multiplayer video games (QUAKE). The connection was too latent to play.

    Yes, when he downloaded files, they came well over 100k/sec.

    The latency would also cause a problem with streaming video or audio. Due to the breaks in the connection (way too fast for use to recognize), the video/audio/games would skip very bad.

    Since he has changed his office to a cable connection and is fraggin away!

    Of course if satellite is all you are able to get in our area, it is great. But if you have another choice (cable / dsl) I would recommend that.

    ....PS.... also, the 'sat modem' they gave him only had a USB port to connect to.... so he was not able to use a router to share the connection to his other computers. So he had to do Internet Connection Sharing which was a nightmare. If you do go w/ Sat and have multiple computers, make sure you get a network (RJ45) connection on the 'sat modem' unit so that it can be connected to a router.

  202. DirecWay User by Peridyd · · Score: 1
    I live in a small town in Eastern Washington (population 600) that's unlikely to be seeing fiber for several years. Just over a year ago I got fed up with the slowwww connection speeds (never better than 28k) and got two-way satellite service from DirecWay.

    At that time, the only option was having a Windows box hooked up to the dish, so I have an XP workstation sitting on the front end of my home network.

    Overall, I'd have to say that I'm fairly satisfied. I've been able to sit in my living room and terminal service into servers at work (over wireless, no less) without too much of a latency issue (it's typically about 3 seconds); at first the delay was disconcerting, but after a while you adjust.

    The pipe is actually pretty fat. I'm averaging a decent transfer rate (~300kb/sec), allowing me to download (or upload) from home most of what I used to piggyback onto my work laptop.

    Weather is occasionally an issue. Snow or ice stuck on the dish, for example, will wipe out the signal entirely. A couple weeks ago, for example, I had to go out when it was -5 degrees and very gingerly remove a coating of ice off the dish in order to meet a deadline. Yet that's been more the exception than the rule. Caveat emptor.

    My only complaint is that the basic satellite home service I signed up for has bandwidth throttling after ~180 mb of traffic in a 24 hour period. (The satellite networking is shared rather than switched, so bandwidth hogs would need to be dealt with). Nonetheless, downloading distro ISOs are still out of the question from home, and that's a real pain.

    It sounds like the service you're considering is an improvement over mine. I'd really like to get rid of the Windows box as the front end of since I'm basically putting the most vulnerable part of the network right up front in script-kiddy land, though DirecWay does seem to have a pretty solid firewall.

    I'll be checking out the DirecWay site for more details about your system.

  203. Nebulink experience anyone? by __aaimgy6840 · · Score: 1

    Can anyone compare DirecWay to Nebulink?

  204. Remote... try the jungle of Ecuador by trance29 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have some users in Coca (Francisco de Orellana), Ecuador. Coca is in eastern Ecuador right in the middle of the jungle (check it out on the map). We have a satellite setup for about 10 users, the bandwidth we are allocated is 128x64kbps. For all that bandwidth we paid $3000 for dish, receiver and setup; we pay $400 a month for this access. The latency is painfully slow however I have found a way to speed things up a bit. I installed a Mini-PC (like those Shuttle XPC's) with Windows 2000. I setup DNS caching along with ISA to do web caching. The experiences amongst the users has improved greatly. Downloads are reasonable and I do some bandwidth access-control/throttling using an old Netscreen-5 firewall (thank you e-bay!), so the big-boss-man always has priority with his access. This is just my experience in this part of the world.

  205. "Have To"? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    They are required by law to provide a T1 if you ask?

    I know there are various requirements mandated by that ludicrous breakup settlement on providing voice, but a digital non voice link? huh?

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:"Have To"? by warpSpeed · · Score: 1
      If they provide a service, voice or data, they have to provide it to all. Universal service is what it falls under, I believe.

      If you do not beleive me contact the fine folks at Bandwidth.com, and they will look at all the Internet carriers and quote you a price to get a T1 or fractional T1 to you house.

      I guess this is one of the drawbacks for being a controled monopoly. The telcos have to live under certain restrictions that require them to provide service to everyone. They may not like it, and they may drag thier feet providing it, but they will provide it. If you are getting service it helps having a national carrier lighting a fire under them to get the installs done in a timely manner. The national carrier know all the rules and regs, and can occationaly remind the local carriers of this

    2. Re:"Have To"? by cyril3 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Universal service is what it falls under

      You Americans are so lucky. The Universal Service Obligation in force in Australia mandates 2400baud (2.4kbits/sec) as the min data rate. And I wrote that twice in different ways so you don't think I can't read geek numbers. It's not a joke.

      And Telstra are happy to remind you of this if you should ever dare to question them.

      There was an enquiry about whether it should be raised to basic rate ISDN 64k but the enquiry decided that Telstra would have ISDN available to just about everyone eventually so why mandate it. Just let market forces provide it in due course. Of course You have to pay for time connected (to Telstra) for the ISDN line and Data downloaded (to your ISP) so its little wonder it didn't become successful. Recently they have really pushed ISDN as an ADSL alternative and as a sop on the pricing they provide no charge connection and call time to an ISP for AUD$16.50 per month. You still pay ISP charges.

      But Telstra now uses availability of ISDN as an excuse for not extending ADSL coverage to new housing which is generally serviced by fibre through RIMs. Every new network extension in Australia in the last ten years has been a fibre line through a RIM using pair-gain technology (probably with line conditioning given the length of some of the fibre runs). How unADSL friendly can it get.

      T1. Hah bloody hah.

    3. Re:"Have To"? by warpSpeed · · Score: 1
      You Americans are so lucky. The Universal Service Obligation in force in Australia mandates 2400baud (2.4kbits/sec) as the min data rate.

      I feel pretty lucky most of the time. :-)

      Verizon (my local telco) guarantees 9600 bits/sec. If you get something better you are graced by god, and have a decent modem. Most people in my neighborhood get 24k or 26k/sec on dialup. There is nothing else avaiable except ISDN. You can pay 2cents/min per channel, or you can buy an unlimited usage, but you still have to pay an ISP too.

      I deployed wireless for my neighbors. Next to the T1 thats all we can get out here. The couple of neighbors that work at home were practicaly knocking me over to help install the antenna next to my garage.

      Nice chatting with you "mate" :-)

    4. Re:"Have To"? by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      You Americans are so lucky. The Universal Service Obligation in force in Australia mandates 2400baud (2.4kbits/sec) as the min data rate.

      I think you misunderstood. American telcos are only required to provide 1400baud. Additionally, they are required to provide any service they offer as long as you're willing to pay the price (and it's technically possible).

      For example, it cost me and 5 of my neighbors about $10k each to get basic phone service, plus we had to sign a 3 year service contract. I don't even want to think about what they would charge to run the extra pairs required for a T1, but they would do it as long as I had the cash.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  206. I'm Jealous by MonkeyDluffy · · Score: 1
    I only get 28k at home - 56k would look like heaven! The phone lines in my neighborhood are bad, so we cannot get any better than that. And I am too far away from the central office for decent DSL speeds.


    Actually, it's not too bad - if you turn off image loading. Just straight html compresses nicely, so the actual throuhput of a page isn't too painful.


    -MDL

    --
    Happy meals fund terrorism
  207. DirecWay Suggestions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If sat. is all you can get, then by all means, get DirecWay. I would recommend the DW4020 over the DW6000. The DW4020 is a rock solid commercial grade router that can be configured to give you static IPs and double the upload speed (aprox 128k) when combined with a .98 meter dish. The DW6000 is a residential box. Check out www.copperhead.cc They run a great message board devoted to DirecWay. Also, check out www.skycasters.com. They are a VAR that offers pretty interesting solutions (including double the upload speed) for people such as you. Talk with Richard McKinney at Skycasters. He is a great sales person (I'm a very satisfied DirecWay/Skycasters customer) that will explain all the inns and outs for you. Do not go with a Powered-By provider such as DirecWay-Powered By AOL.

  208. Direcway issues... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had the old modem, and it was a lemon. On top of being chained to Windows it seemed to go out often. We would call in, they would site the weather as an issue, but at 4000ft the weather was below us. It only seemed to happen when it was sunny. Come to find out, there was a bit of an overheating problem with the unit.

    Other then that, ssh was glitchy, and downloads somewhat slow. I had the opportunity to use another product I found much better. Gilat had a unit like the 6000, years ago. Compeltely independent, and they would let you install it yourself. You may want to look at thier offering as well. They seem to be a bit ahead of Direcway.

    http://www.gilat.com/Home.asp

  209. Not Quite..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I approached my local Telco about getting a T1 for the house. When I asked the customer service rep, she asked 'A T-what?' and then referred me to the manager who also asked 'A T-what?' It seems that my local telco is privately owned, and has six employees TOTAL. Three work the office and three work the lines. Yes, I live in Michigan, not far from Ann Arbor.

    1. Re:Not Quite..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Only computer nerds call it a "T1". Had you asked for a "DS1" they would know exactly what you were talking about.

  210. A message for CmdrTaco... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This topic, while perhaps not front-page material, couldn't be more relevant to me. I live probably no more than 15 miles from CmdrTaco (west of Chelsea, MI) in an area where DSL and cable are not (!) available.

    If you wouldn't mind summarizing your findings, I'd be very grateful. :)

  211. GroundControl... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out GroundControl's 4020 system, up front hardware costs are steep (1700+) however the monthly is only 115.00 with a static ip and NO FAP!! Latency of course is an issue, however no other options make satellite attractive.

  212. consider keeping both sat and phone by doneWithMyTattoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Howdy, Your satalite link will be way better for large file transfers. Your modem link will be way better for interactive sessions. The particular dis-advantage of each will drive you crazy. You might be able to contract with both services and plan to use the link which will best suit your puprose of the moment/session.

  213. sat@once ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.sat@once.csp.it/

    maybe not exactly what you are looking for, and i haven't tried it yet, but i think it seems to be quite nice (it's free!)..

    1. Re:sat@once ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is an article in the newest "Tele Satellite International" about it.
      It says it works quite well.

  214. Abuse? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Hey, its his house.. his rules.. .

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  215. No connection to DirecTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having DirecTV already is of no benefit. DirecWay requires it's own dish - it's a bidirectional dish, unlike the television one, which is receive-only. So, there's no savings at all for being an existing DirecTV customer.

    Also note that, while you can install your own DirecTV receive-only dish, FCC regulations restrict you from installing your own microwave transmitter - so you MUST get the DirecWay dish professionally installed. (You also want it high up, on a roof or similar, so that stray kids and dogs don't walk in front of it and get fried).

  216. How is it for usenet leeching? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I've read that these satellite providers just broadcast their usenet feed 24/7 and if you pick your stuff off the broadcast it doesn't count against your FAP.

    So, questions about StarBand:

    1) Is that true about broadcasting the feed?
    2) If so, do they carry the alt.binaries hierarchy?
    3) How is there coverage for alt.binaries?

    I envision a 1TB spool on my system that just sucks in everything from the groups that I am interested in and then I point my newsreader at it locally and pick and choose what I want. Do you think that would work ok with the way Starband does usenet?

  217. Re:Abuse?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lack of cholesterol intake leads to depression and a dramatic decrease in mental capacity. That explains why you're having so many problems.

  218. VPN Problems by mikemalter · · Score: 2, Informative

    I did a lot of research with Direct as I needed to provide internet access for a client of mine in a remote location. The problem with satellite is that you cannot do VPN at speeds that are beyond dialup. That the pages do not say VPN anywhere indicates to me that you still can't do VPN at broadband speeds and this might be a problem. Otherwise, others that I have talked to using satellite for internet access say it is fine - no major glitches.

  219. Direcway XP by walkerp1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have a Direcway 2-way satellite connection, and I've been pretty satisfied with it as a whole. I don't have any experience with the newer systems (mine is ~1.25 years old), but I thought I'd share anyway.

    To answer the first question I ever had: yes, the latency is horrible. I get roughly 700-850ms to the backbone. I do a lot of support from home, and I do it via the corporate VPN when I'm on the satellite. Because of the excessive handshaking, my connection actually responds worse than my 28Kbps connections directly to the customer's network. For more intense bitstreams like PCAnywhere, MS TSC, or VNC connections, the satellite holds its own, but only until I open a console window, and then we're back to major suck.

    Web surfing tends to be better than my 33Kbps modem connection when I take advantage of the "Web accelerator" that Direcway provides - for pages with lots of graphics anyway. Still, I dislike the interminable 3-4 second delay between click and action. Furthermore, the speed I enjoy now is the result of much research and T&E with configuration settings. Out of the box, things didn't go quite that well.

    I got the $100USD installation fee waived when I bought my equipment, so that wasn't an issue for me. Too bad the FCC wouldn't allow me to do my own installation, because that's what I ended up doing. The guy they sent out here was clueless with regard to satellite setup. The only thing he got right was setting the pole in concrete. He finally left the first day without ever getting anything done (other than the pole). That night (after dark even), I sighted in the dish, installed the software, and got to the point where I needed only to enter the activation code (which I didn't have). The next day, the sat man brought a couple that he was "training" to help him out. He was a little perturbed that all the work was already done, but he told them to remove the dish and begin as if they were starting from scratch?!! It took them all day long to get a poor signal, but it was just enough for them to be able to activate, so they left it at that. Once they left, I took a few minutes to get my signal strength back up and voila! In all the time I've had the system, there have been no additional costs above the advertised price (think mine is $50USD/mo).

    I don't notice much difference in peak and non-peak usage, but with a nominal ping of 850ms, an additional 200ms is chump change anyway. The traffic cap is annoying sometimes (too lazy to patch?). I haven't paid much attention to it, but it feels like I've got about a 450Mb bucket to draw from which gets replentished at about 120Mb an hour (more late at night when I'm on :) . When you run out, expect dial-up speeds for 3-4 hours as punishment for hoarding all that precious bandwidth all to yourself. My standard workload is 20-50Mb/hr, and I surf for much less.

    So, in conclusion, I keep the satellite because work pays for it. My wife and I enjoy playing Starcraft online with our friends. She'll use the sat connection, and I'll dialup (silly UDP port restriction for Starcraft prevents us from both using the sat). The lag is bad, but we still get reasonible quality games if we set the Extra High Latency option. For other games that I play alone, I use dial-up for most everything with the occasional exception for mudding.

  220. Cable pings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are the ping times you quoted for cable so high? What kind of cable connection are you talking about? I have a 200kB/32kB, and ping times are rarely above 80ms.

  221. How is DirectWay for Usenet Leeching? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I've read that these satellite providers just broadcast their usenet feed 24/7 and if you pick your stuff off the broadcast it doesn't count against your FAP.

    So, questions about DirectWay:

    1) Is that true about broadcasting the feed?
    2) If so, do they carry the alt.binaries hierarchy?
    3) How is their coverage for alt.binaries?

    I envision a 1TB spool on my system that just sucks in everything from the groups that I am interested in and then I point my newsreader at it locally and pick and choose what I want. Do you think that would work ok with the way DirectWay does usenet?

  222. Truth in TROLLing, not-Seth-Finkelstein by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Out of the mouths of trolls ...

    You're not Seth Finkelstein, you're a troll.

    Why don't you just post this stuff without stealing someone's name?

  223. I say stay with Dial-up. Please? by FreeLinux · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One of the nice things about sites like Google and Slashdot is that they load rather quickly. Slashdot is not yet plagued by things like countless useless animations, excessive graphics and flash. I can't help but feel that is has a lot to do with the fact that Taco is viewing the site over a dialup connection.

    If he moves to high-speed access I fear that it will only be a short while before new web "features" start taking over the site and it becomes as slow as all the rest.

    I have always maintained that web developers should be forced to use their sites over bad dial-up connections so that they keep things compact and don't overload the site with bloated images and useless animation like so many do. There is nothing worse than being stuck behind a hotel PBX and having to work or access web sites via a 19200 dial-up connection.

    Gee Bob, I really don't apreciate you sending me the HTML email with that ugly stationary theme and the 1 meg image in your sig!!! That inane "Wassup" message took ten figging minutes to download!!!!!

  224. FAP by Revek · · Score: 2, Informative

    read the fine print you get a very short burst of high speed then the fair access policy comes in to play. they then slow down to 56k or less

  225. Direcway both a blessing and curse by nb+caffeine · · Score: 1

    Ive ran direcway for 2+ years, and my expirences are mixed. We have the older modem, so my router is (ick) a windoze machine. From there, wifi serves our house with access. Basically, its better than dialup. Doing any kind of remote terminal access is awful (type a character, appears several seconds later). Also, which is probably mentioned in the comments, the issue with FAP. Luckily, i convinced my parents to upgrade to a buisness class service. Getting a full ISO of a linux distro takes over night, but doesnt get my connection killed like it did with the basic service. Once you pay off the hardware, its not a whole lot more than cable, but for us geeks in the sticks, its about the only option. I say go for it taco, but beware of its many caveats. oh, and i would love to get my hands on the new modem with the rj45 connectors. Would make running my home network MUCH easier than "relying" on windowsXP.

    --

    "Something's wrong with you...and I hope we never do meet again." - Deftones When Girls Telephone Boys
  226. Product Review by a Current Customer by $nyper · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, here is my opinion and we have been used four seperate satellite setups for about two years now. For normal web browsing the DirectWay Satellite system is not much better than dial-up and in some cases much worse. The more individual files that the website has the slower the response time is from the satellite. We installed several on the outskirts of three cities to provide a link to our remote offices were broadband was not an option.

    First off, talk with the technical engineers because the sales people forget to mention that some traffic like ICMP and others are automatically placed at the bottom of the satellite systems queue. This is why you will see things like a 400ms+ ping time. What we learned is that if you use your link for downloading files it is great. Once the connection is established it goes beautifully. The problem with game playing or even intense web browsing is that you are always transmitting data and files that may be small but the fact that it requires multiple file transfers is the bad part. When you think about it, how many files does your web browser download when you go to a website core html, pics, flash, audio, etc? The more individual files on a site really causes problems for the system's performance. Like I said though when we used it we did data batching scenario and would compress large quantities of data into a single file and then FTP it to a drop box for pick up in our corporate office at regular batch intervals. In this type of scenario we got great performance with a several hundred K/sec file transfer rate.

    If you want to deploy any type of remote desktop software you better make it VNC with best compression or forget it. Even the use of VNC will turn out to be a lesson in humility and frustration.

    In my opinion the system really stinks for anything other than large file downloads. It just does not seem to be very versatile.

    --
    "Help me Obi-/.-Kenobi,your my only hope!" -$
    1. Re:Product Review by a Current Customer by cruachan · · Score: 1

      Hmm. You are obviously missing a fairly fundemental modification to your setup if your having problems with web browsing over DirecWay. This is one of those things that works like a charm.

      Fortunatly it's is easily fixed. See the section on "Improving Browser Performance on Clients" at
      http://www.copperhead.cc/tips.html.

      Basically you simply have to tell IE (or whatever browser you are using) to download 25 or so files in parallel rather than the default 2 or 3. Because of the way sat works those 25 get downloaded at the same speed as the 3 your were requesting previously.

      Net result is that browsing runs at the same speed over sat as over cable, but instead of the page filling in individual items over a couple of seconds you get the whole lot at once.

  227. How can you give DirecTV money? by Ath · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you actually give DirecTV money, I suggest you get familiar with their 100,000 lawsuit/letter compaign against purchasers of completely legal ISO programmers.

    "In Germany, they first came for the communists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist. Then they came for the Catholics and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Catholic. Then they came for me -- and by that time there was nobody left to speak up." -Martin Niemoller

    Nobody is suggesting you do anything other than stop giving them your money. Especially as you can get DISH and have the same capabilities.

  228. "Thanks fatso" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice quick response. A personal attack that says something about an anonymous person you have no information on. Unfortunately, it isn't true, so you can quit using that line. But in any case, I'm not offended, I understand what you are going through here.

    I'm trying to help you. You don't have to eat any other animal product, just raw egg yolks. If you have political reasons for your diet, you can get your eggs from a source which doesn't violate animal rights.

    You'll be amazed at how much happier you are once you do this. Start out slow, with 1 egg yolk a day, and slowly increase to 6 eggs. The depression will probably go away almost immediately. You'll find you can think better and your mind will function a lot better.

    1. Re:"Thanks fatso" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks fatso

  229. I want that, TO GO! by Chaostrophy · · Score: 1

    http://www.satcomweb.com/mobile.htm is a phased array antena for your car for DirectTV and similar systems. Internet any where, well, anywhere in the satalite footprint if it they can all work together.

    --
    Plato seems wrong to me today
  230. get it. by univeralifepadre · · Score: 1

    yes, the latency sucks. but if you've been using shitty, rural 56k for a long time (and if you're considering direcway you probably have) this is going to be a huge improvement. fps gaming is out, but you can still play civ3. and ssh is useable. the new system is agnostic as noted, so unlike the previous version you won't need a win98 firewall (damn!). there are some gotchas still - you can't run a server due to the way they have their system set up, but i doubt you were running one on the dialup.

  231. You're right... by Dan+East · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...he should put up a standard TV antenna on a 100 foot tower, so he can pick up 2 channels full of static.

    Oh, but wait, he could just stream real-time video or download DVDs off of his 56k dialup. Is that the alternative you are suggesting?

    Geez, some people need to think before they get on their moral soapbox. Some other people need to think before they mod that crap up too.

    Dan East

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:You're right... by Arker · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, so multiple TV channels are a necessity of life now are they? Please. TV is shit anyway. You are willing to compromise your principles and support such evil with your own money to get... TV? Come on. You're the one that needs to think before you get on your soapbox.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    2. Re:You're right... by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1

      I used to have a Tivo and a DirectTV receiver. I ditched cable ages ago. At first I kept watching the dish channels but ended up doing it less and less. So I stopped screwing with the cards and went back to broadcast. And then watched that less and less. Why? There is nothing on cable, satellite or broadcast to watch but some more and more imbecillic drivel. Science channels are now Demolition Derby and Weddings channels. Everywhere else you get to see which trailer trash will vote what cretin of what island. So now my TV is used once every few months or so to play an occasional DVD. I discovered that my life is better without TV. For news there is the Net (google news service rocks) and press. For entertaiment you get to participate in real life with friends, books and you can always play computer games.

    3. Re:You're right... by MsGeek · · Score: 1

      For economic reasons, I had to choose between ditching our cable TV and ditching our DSL. I said adios to Adelphia last year around this time. The only thing I miss not having cable is the fact that over-the-air broadcast quality kinda sucks nowadays, especially when you are trying to pull it in with rabbit ears.

      I also mildly miss a few specialty channels but I can live without them and I've got plenty of friends who can vidcap and burn or run tape if I really need to see something.

      DSL, OTOH...from my cold, dead hands! From my cold, dead hands! Adelphia cable modem is not an option because our area does not run on DOCSIS but proprietary crap (Terayon TeraPro) that has you losing your connection multiple times a day. It's nice to have a Broadband connection that is there for you anytime you want it.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    4. Re:You're right... by Bob+MacSlack · · Score: 1

      So we're all a bunch of hippies now?

      Maybe he doesn't care? Personally, I'm trying to convince my parents to get Dish Network instead, but frankly it's not that big a deal to me. If it were my only choice, I'd take it too.

    5. Re:You're right... by Arker · · Score: 1

      Hippies? What does hippies have to do with anything? I work for a living. I get 14 channels of TV for free with my apartment (and in this part of the world, that's a lot) but I haven't turned the thing on for 2 days now anyway. I have, you may have heard of the thing, a life. That means things to do besides sit in front of the box and live my life vicariously through some stupid sitcom. TV of any kind is not a necessity, and in fact it's a pretty sorry excuse for a luxury as well.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    6. Re:You're right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to the Neilsens, you and your views are in the minority.

      Before calling anyone out (not saying you have, but your statement is worded stringly) I'd recomend you do it in a more private forum.

    7. Re:You're right... by MrUnknown · · Score: 1

      That means things to do besides sit in front of the box and live my life vicariously through some stupid sitcom.

      This obviously doesn't include sitting in front of the other box, living your life complaining about others who like TV and don't agree to your ideals.

  232. Re:Weather / Dish aim and signal quality by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1
    My worst satellite reception experience? I lost DirectTV *THREE TIMES* when the cable company came by over and over and cut my satellite wire, somehow thinking it was stolen cable (COX.

    On private property? I'd have had their asses in court so fast their heads would be spinning.

  233. it is good..... by Dragor-X · · Score: 1

    And with that subject what more do you need. I am a little biased because I have been an installer, but I live here in rural Oklahoma, and have no chance of ever getting anything but dial-up in my little poedunk town, so I got it, since I could get it for a cheaper monthly price, and have been happy with it ever since. Now mind you, I have the older version that requires you to have software loaded on your pc to run it, but older it be, good it still is. if you have any technical questions about it, feel free to e-mail me.

  234. Beware the upload... by Mythicman · · Score: 1

    Read the fine print.
    I've got a user on this service, and its been a nightmare (I'm a network admin, and have 10 remote users connected over VPN to the office). If you EVER need to upload anything, you may as well dial up. When dealing with their support, I was told that a 40Kbps upload speed is within their spec, and so they wouldn't work with me to improve it at all. This becomes an issue when you need to send emails with attachments (or connect to an Exchange server, as was the case for me until I gave up and mover her to a pop3 configuration in Outlook), or any other data you might need to send. I've had a ton of issues supporting this user, and by contrast, my one user who is on dial-up is nearly problem-free. Here's hoping this WiMax stuff catches on

  235. Interactive Shell Solution by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

    I haven't seen anybody suggest something like this, so here I go. I've never had to try it, because I always have a reasonable connection when I want to ssh, but it seems to me that it could work pretty well.

    Get a MUD client. Connect to localhost, telnet port, and log in. From there, ssh out. You still have a big delay between when you hit return and when you see the result, but you don't have a delay for the rest of your typing, which is the big deal. Interactive editors would be a bit hard to use, but you can always run those locally. The point is to buffer your command line instead of sending it character-by-character, so your latency shows up only when you actually expect a real response from the other end.

    --
    Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  236. Whether the water conducts or not... by Spamalamadingdong · · Score: 2, Informative
    it has a high index of refraction due to its high dielectric constant. This would tend to muck up the wavefront shape of anything that reflects (rather than being absorbed).

    This is one place where the solid dish is a disadvantage. If the dish was a mesh (coarse enough to let water fall through rather than being held in the holes by surface tension) this might not be such a problem.

  237. Use PAM by Dan+East · · Score: 1

    Use PAM or some other non-stick cooking spray on your dish to help keep water / snow from sticking to it.

    Dan East

    --
    Better known as 318230.
  238. hell fucking yeah there is a catch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DON'T SIGN UP FOR THAT BULLSHIT! I had it. Oh my holy hell... sure it's fast, but call them and ask them about the flipping cap.

    200mb cap for 4 hours! yes, call those bastards up and ask em about it. I can d/l that much on a damn 56k modem in that same timeframe, and yet DWay costs $60/mo. Oh, and they cap you at 1kb/s for 8hours if you exceed it.

    So call 'em up and tell em to shove it. I did.

  239. Starband Experience by d3us3xmach1na · · Score: 1

    I got Starband (and lost DSL) after moving 7 miles out of town into the woods (in this part of Vermont I'm lucky I have power :-) )

    Starband is coming out with the same router based service (the 480 Pro model) for their "telecommuter pacakge" Currently it's only available for small businesses at $139+/month. They don't have pricing yet for telecommuter, but I expect monthly they will be in the $79-99 range.

    I have the standard home user package. I bought my equipment so it's only $49/month. I currently get around 60 Kbps/450 Kbps up/down. For most use it's adequate (especially web/mail).

    Starband doesn't support but allows the use of a windows box as a gateway (I bought WinProxy for Starband specifically for this).

    I would have much preferred setting up an IPCop box, or just using a linksys router, but their software that runs the modem only works on Windows (supposedly).

    You aren't supposed to be able to use a VPN, but in a pinch I have used our Cisco PIX VPN with decent (but slow) results. Connections do get dropped pretty regularly. The telecommuter version is supposed to support VPN more robustly, especially non-IPSEC variants.

    Depending on the monthly upcharge I may upgrade once telecommuter is available.

    The conclusion:

    If you don't have any other choice and need more speed than dialup, it's a pretty decent solution, especially if you mostly deal with stateless protocols.

    no sig for you!

    1. Re:Starband Experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah you must do stateless stuff, no ssh, telnet or anything like that because it takes for ever for every bit of character to go up to the satelitte, down to ground station and again in reverse, were talking 500ms to 800ms at least. I've installed starband for a year and a half, and had it at my house and the most noteable short comings where the huge latencys...

  240. I love my Direcway by neokruncher · · Score: 2

    I have a cottage in Northern Canada and get 650kps with 65% signal quality because I am receiving through trees. It has never gone down except in EXTREMELY hard rains (trees were coming down). I can stream shoutcast all day and the latency is bearable for VOIP being 500msec on average. I work with real time stock quotes and spend the whole summer up there...

  241. Ann Arbor is NOT the end of the world! by sleazyrider · · Score: 1

    It's the home of the University of Michigan and is quite a nice small city. I find it surprising that the town is not wired on speed, as it is a fairly yuppyish place. I live about 30 minutes north of town, have highspeed and am a whole lot more rural than him. As an aside, this is where they have the annual Hash Bash, if you're into that. ;-)

  242. Multilink PPP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is a standard, RFC 1990, and supported by Cisco hardware, FreeBSD 4.9, etc.. It lets you combine several slower links, think modems, into one faster link. You have the expence of multiple phone lines but you might get a volume discount. And in some places all you can get is a phone line.

    I know in 3rd world places, where a dish might attract the wrong kind of gun fire, multilink ppp is used over existing bad phone connections(9600) to make faster pipes for sending pictures back to CENSORED. THE REST OF THIS COMMENT HAS BEEN REMOVED. MNGT.

  243. Don't really need 6000 by ziegast · · Score: 1

    You don't really need their new machine-agnostic service. It's not hard to find an old laptop or PentiumI PC lying around that can serve as your gateway module.

    Step 1:
    Find a PC with a USB port and install an
    Ethernet card if it doesn't already have one.

    Step 2:
    Make sure the PC has Win98se, Win2000, or WinXP.
    Install DirectTV as a USB client to their modem.
    The DirecTV install tech should be able to help
    you with this. You'll have an IP address on
    DirecTV's network and be able to browse the web.

    Step 3:
    Setup Internet Connection Sharing on the PC to
    enable a 192.168.0.0 network on the Ethernet
    card.

    Step 4:
    Plug a hub or switch into the Ethernet card
    to allow other clients to connect to your
    192.168.0.0 network.

    Step 5:
    Take an Windows/Linux/Mac PC and set it to
    boot via DHCP. It should work, just as if it
    were talking to a cable modem or DSL modem.

    Step 5a (optional):
    For extra reliability/stability of web
    connections, you could optionally set the
    browser on the new client to use the gateway
    PC as an HTTP proxy server. I think it listens
    on 192.168.0.1:83, but I'm not sure.

    Step 5b (optional):
    It is possible to connect a standard broadband
    router into the gateway PC and use its firewall
    features to keep your home network protected
    while you're connected or even connect wireless
    gear to your network. You need to set the
    WAN interface of the router to use DHCP, and you
    need to set the internal netowrk to be something
    other than the default 192.168.0.0 (for example
    192.168.1.0), so that the router doesn't get
    confused about addresses on the external and
    intranal side of its network.

    It's faster than dialup for downloads, but not as reliable. If you have access to anything else (cable, DSL, broadband wireless), you're better off.

    I setup a remote coworker with 5/5a/5b who roamed around his house with an 802.11b wireless laptop. As long as there were no packet drops on his wireless, it worked ok. Note: If you get any packet loss, your packets now have a RTT of 1000ms to the remote server instead of just 100ms and retransmits really really suck.

    -ez

  244. A "REAL" review... by moosesocks · · Score: 1

    From looking at this story, so far we have about 200 comments so far - and about 5 reviews. Most comments are highly moderated flames. Anyhow, I'll do my best to contribute my "actual" experiences with DirecWay.

    Short review: It sucks. You're better off with ISDN.

    Long review:

    I helped to set a good friend of mine up with a DirecWay connection, as he lives on the outskirts of town on a private road, and is unable to recieve any other form of broadband. This was about 3 years ago, and at the time, it was DirecPC, and only worked one-way.

    And it was okay. When it worked, we could get a respectable 150kB/s (close to the advertised 1.5mbps) and
    about 700ms pings. Not great, but certainly tolerable. The slow 56k upload was a hassle, though. In addition, I will testify that their software was bad--no, it was horrible. It was buggy, and behaved erratically.

    DirecWay promised that when they rolled out two-way service, the software and the service would be completely revamped.

    Around this time, my friend spent one year abroad. During this time, he cancelled his subscription.

    When he returned, he called DirecWay and had them install the two-way service. Thanks to the installer, he never did any setup on his PC, and didn't install the connection software, nor did he leave a CD.

    As we found out, there is no easy way to download the software via. the net. In fact, once they finally sent us a CD, we couldn't find patches on their site. Which brings me to the topic of their support. I have called them many many times. Their staff is unknowledgable, hold times are guarrunteed to be over an hour, and they are barely fluent in English. DirecWay recieves a F- for support.

    The new modem was little more than a modifed one-way modem which only connected via USB - not the promised revamped hardware. The software installation process was buggy. Very buggy. You had to try two to three times before an installation would finally work. Once we got it running, we saw that it was the exact same software we had used a year earlier - with a small patch to enable two-way communications - NOT the promised revamped software. And there was no way to see if there was an update via. DirecWay's website. They do have a support site. It's well hidden, and down most of the time.

    Oh yes. Most everything is down most of the time. In the year we weren't using it, their NOC continued it's decline. DNS was a mixed bag - sometimes it worked sometimes it didn't, and you couldn't use a non-direcway DNS server. You also had to use a proxy server to access HTTP sites. This combination meant that the service was down. A lot.

    Thanks to direcway's otherwise useless diagnostic utility, we could see that our modem was indeed in tip-top shape. We never dropped below 80% signal. It was clearly not the weather. When the service went down (which was quite often), it was usually a result of network trouble at DW. Even when we were able to get on, it wasn't that fast in terms of thoroughput or latency. Ironically, the site which always had the most trouble was DW's own site. It was ALWAYS down.

    Now, the DW6000 caught my eye as solving many of these problems. However, after several phone calls to DW, I determined that not one of their representatives had even HEARD of the modem.

    However, even if we could try it out, we wouldn't. They failed to come through on every other one of their promises they had made in the past. Their support was terrible, and their whole company was poorly run.

    This is on top of all the stuff being discussed in this thread about the TOS policies, bandwidth caps, etc.

    In short, we cancelled it. It just wasn't worth the pain and aggrivation. They keep promising improvements, but have always failed to deliver. If you can get ISDN, go for that, or attempt to do some sort of line-of-sight WiFi with a friend across town. You could even try to make your own DSL by ordering a dry copper loop between your house and one with broadband. Heck, even multilink 56k would be better...

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  245. Direcway is hell by hedsteve · · Score: 1

    if you like sitting on the phone to ask why you can't send emails to anyone or are wondering why your being blocked as a spammer then you'll love it... We got direcway because my mom teaches online courses and wireless and cable weren't here yet and after a week there were so many problems that we got to talk to "muhamed but you can call me John" (the support is based in India and they tell you their name and then an american name that you can call them) almost 3 times a week if not more with about 2-4 hours waiting for each call. luckily wireless has come into the area and once the contract expires the satelite is gone

  246. DirecWay by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

    I was looking at it myself. My personal wireless T1 may be going away in August (the source is moving, probably away from my line of sight). I'm working with some financial backers to light up the city I'm in wireless, but who knows if it'll be done by August. If it does work out well, we'll be covering the entire Los Angeles area in a couple years. The Charter Communications folks were really upset when I moved. I ditched the cable TV for DirecTV, and went to the wireless (above). They were begging for me to stay with them, but I was like, "If your service didn't completely suck, I would have." It was bad. More than half the time, I would find my download speeds at or below 128K, and if I started an upload, I was below 128K. When it's barely faster than a 56k dialup, why pay the extra cost?

    I was watching TV, and saw the DirecWay ad, and thought it looked interesting, so I switched over to the DirecWay channel. I don't know the channel off hand, but it has a 15 to 30 minute looping advertisment on it with the bubbly airhead repeating the same brainwashing over and over.

    DirecWay has a speed comparison chart at:

    http://directv.direcway.com/connection_test.html

    Basically, DirecWay a box, that attaches to your computer via ethernet and to a DirecTV-like dish with a transceiver on it (bigger LNB). They say it'll give UP TO 500Kb/s for downloads, and no information on uploads, so this could be comparable to cablemodem or DSL, depending on your neighborhood. They say it's "really fast" compared to 28.8 modem, so who knows.

    You should expect long latency though, so browsing Slashdot may be ok, but SSHing to the server to make changes will be painful. Since I spend half my life in a shell using SSH, I'm not sure I could handle it.

    I see quite a few comments about weather problems. You shouldn't really expect bad weather related problems, at least with DirecTV. I messed around with my dish until I had beween 92% and 100% signal strength on all channels with the A and B LNB's. If you're up north or find you have a weaker signal, you can buy a bigger dish that'll fix you right up. My friend owns dssaccessories.com, and he recommends using the upgraded 24" dish. If you have iceing problems, use a heated dish. I'm in LA, with a 2 LNB oval dish, and have no problems, even in the occasional rain storm. My dish is secured well with the standard equipment, so it doesn't get blown around with wind. It'll take the same kind of work to get a really good signal DirecWay signal. Don't necessarly trust the installers when they put it in. My in-laws had their DirecTV dish put behind a tree, so when the wind blows, they loose their signal.

    They're looking for a $599.98 deposit and a monthly cost of $59.99 or a $99.99 activation fee, and a 15 month contract at $99.99 to cover the equipment cost, converting to $59.99 after 15 months. Either way, it's pricy.

    Hope this helps.

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  247. Multiple Dialup Connections by MrCam · · Score: 1

    It isn't as fast as Sat. but you could get a multiple Dialup setup. One our clients had a remote office in Grass Lake MI with a CISCO router and 6 dialup lines. This is what they setup after the POS Starband system wouldn't stay connected with multiple users. The ISP was Digital Realm in Ypsilanti...they most likely still have the equipment and nothing to do with it. Our client finaly was able to get a T1 that could handle IP traffic so the dialup system was taken out.

  248. Happy Direcway User by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've used the two-way service for about 21 months now. Just switched to thier DW6000 modem. That was a welcome relief, although expensive, but the ability to network without 3rd party proxies is nice... one less thing to deal with.

    Issues: Latency can be a pain, sometimes VPN connection to work doesn't..., Fair Access Policy.. understand the concept, and I know I can pay more for more access, but if you bump the ceiling on FAP, they throttle you back for and hour or two... limited to about 4-5 MB while throttled.

  249. DirecWay comments... by jyanix · · Score: 1

    Just some comments:

    There is nothing in common between DirecTV and the DirecWay service except that both can use the same dish. The ground stations are on opposite sides of the United States (DirecTV - west, DirecWay - east). They do not share the same satellite transponders, therefore comparing delay / transmission problems need to be looked at separately. The DirecWay system does experience some problems in heavy rain / snow conditions but not across the board (unless the storm is in MD). It completely depends on which satellite / transponder you were commissioned to during account setup. Just like DirecTV has limits to the number of channels it can broadcast due to satellite bandwidth constraints, DirecWay has limits to the number of customers it can place on a transponder and the amount of data that can cross these links (hence why FAP was created). The bandwidth issue is a huge deal, transponders are expensive and it takes time to set up the ground equipment to support it. Unfortunately, it is not as easy as adding more T1/T3/OC-xx lines to a router to provide more bandwidth.

    Most protocols work over the DirecWay system without any problem. H.323 (i.e. NetMeeting) sometimes causes a concern but normally the tech support people can get that resolved. While many people do complain about latency issues, especially with games, there is not much you can do about that. It is pretty hard to get around the fact that the signal has to travel up to the bird and back down. Ping round trips at 800ms to 1200ms delay. There are continuous efforts to increase performance on the ground side to lessen these issue.

    If you have access to DSL or Cable broadband you should pursue that. DirecWay is more suited for remote locations where the only other option is dial-up.

  250. ClearWave by adler187 · · Score: 1

    I have a friend that uses the Midwest Wireless ClearWave service and really enjoys it. Its only available in southeastern Minnesota and parts of Wisconsin and Iowa (i think). For $100 a month he gets 1MBit up/down, without a cap. He had DirecWay for a while and got sick of the 500MB per day cap. I guess after that they drop you down to 56k speed. It might be different now, but he got fed up and kicked their ass to the curb. If your in the area for the service, I would try it out, especially if you can split the cost with someone. My parents were just outside of the coverage line so they cant get it, but hey DSL just became available so alls good around there.

    I don't really care now since im going to University of Minn. Duluth which has a 35MBit pipe feeding the University. The max i have reached is somewhere between 3-5MBit.

  251. Just wait it out by sn0wman3030 · · Score: 1

    I also live outside Ann Arbor (Saline, actually), and until about a month ago, i had direcpc satillite internet. In my 2 year experience with satillite internet, I can say that it isn't worth the cost. It's slow (200 kbit/s at best), the latancy is high (ssh is nearly impossible (type a command, wait 5-10 seconds)), and it's damn expensive, more expensive than cable. The router that you mentioned is a few hundred dollars if I'm not mistaken, the dish is $300, and the service is $60 per month. It's just not worth it. Web browsing IS faster, but the support for linux and certain protocals (rsync comes to mind) is very flaky. I would recommend just waiting until Comcast rewires your area. They're currently rewireing a lot of the areas around Ann Arbor, I've seen the crews out and about. My neighborhood was hooked up about a month ago. It's just a matter of time before you'll be surfing in style on a 3 mbit/s cable connection, so have patience.

    --
    Life is offtopic.
  252. The internet lifestyle... by aquarian · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...has become more and more about finding places with cheaper and cheaper rent, because you can no longer make enough money to live in a real city with real internet access!

    1. Re:The internet lifestyle... by kfg · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess I'd have to ask you to define "cheap", "real" and "city."

      KFG

  253. Say it isn't so! by Marvin_OScribbley · · Score: 1

    I'm abusing my power as Slashdot editor

    --
    I'm not a journalist, but I play one on slashdot
  254. My DirecWay Experiences - Some Important Points by zeroseventytwo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I too live in the middle of nowhere in the mountains of Southern California. I doubt even wireless internet will reach here anytime soon, so I have to use DirecWay. Here are some important points from my experiences:

    (1) Avoid Hughes as an ISP. We used them for awhile. Very flaky reliability, especially downloading large files. Downloads were about 10K-30K per second when they did work. Uploading large files, supposedly possible at about 4K-5K per second was just impossible. Forget streaming audio or video. Want support? Go to AA or something, 'cause you won't get much with them.

    (2) Use a good ISP like Ground Control. Get the Business Edition. This runs about $100 a month, but you get a static IP address and it is very reliable. Downloads from good servers can come through at speeds up to 150K/second or more. Uploads almost always work, even though they are still at around 5K/second. Streaming audio and video works, sometimes. Plus, their support is pretty good.

    (3) Realize that you have a daily limit on bandwidth. You can probably pay more to get more, but the Business Edition gives you something like 350 MB/day, with a 'trickle recharge' of something like 5K/second or about 18MB an hour on your limit. That means, that whatever you take off your daily limit, every second gives you an additional 5K. If you exceed this limit you get FAPd (Fair Access Policy) which means you get reduced to about modem speeds for 12 hours.

    (4) Non Business Edition subscribers get only 200 MB/day (I think) and are FAPd for 24 hours upon breaching the limit.

    (5) Expect the proxy to go down on occasion. Surfing with the proxy enabled is MUCH faster than without, but you may find that sometimes your connection appears to stop working. Disabling the proxy often will fix that. Also, try to 'restart' the DIRECWAY Webcast service as this will often fix the proxy problem. Sometimes you'll just need to reboot, and sometimes it's just them.

    (6) Have your dish adjusted properly. Figuring out how to this this yourself can save you a lot of money (but I think you have to be licensed, officially). Pay particular attention not just to your signal level, but also your 'Isolation' level. The DirecWay dish doesn't just get adjusted on two axis, but also 'rotates' to adjust the polarization relative to the transponder on the satellite. If your polarization is not isolated enough, your signal gets 'stepped on' by other signals (and you probably do some stepping yourself). The connection may still work, but may become more flaky. Since there are now some 8 thousand mobile DirecWay satellite dishes which adjust themselves - all from varying locations at varying times of the day with variable success at isolating their signals, and because there are countless satellite techs who don't polarize the dishes correctly to isolate their signals, you may have great access one day and all of a sudden it starts to slow down and get flaky the next. Checking your isolation value may show that someone else is stepping on you, at which point you'd re-adjust your own dish again to isolate it better.

    (7) If you adjust your own dish, do pay attention to stay behind the dish if you ever want to have children again. The transmitter is very powerful and can potentially do bad things to your body. If you set it up yourself, don't put it someplace where kids or other people will be exposed close up to the transmitter. If you plan on carrying around the dish with you on vacation (yes, some people do this in their RVs) and you don't have a mobile license, realize that you are breaking the law, possibly irradiating innocent civilians, and anyway the DirecWay people know where you are within about 20 miles, and they are supposedly disabling accounts of those people who move the dishes around with them.

    (8) Don't be disappointed. THIS IS NOT BROADBAND! In comparison, it really sucks. But it doesn't suck as much as dialup!

  255. Damn by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1

    Would be nice if I could get 56K. Nope, we've got an 8 machine LAN all using NAT over a 28.8 dialup line. (Yeah, we have more computers than users at home. Some of us have a laptop and desktop.)

    I also feel sorry for the /. readers pulling in at 21.6 and such. Very sorry. Consider yourself lucky, Rob. Your connection is better than what many other /. readers must endure.

  256. Its a matter of routing by Alan+Cox · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Remember Linux (and I believe FreeBSD and OpenBSD) support routing by port number and by protocol flags. That means you can (with a little care) make sure your ssh goes via the modem while your file sucking operations go via the satellite.

    All you really need then is something to check file sizes against the bandwidth cap and fax orders for very large files from a CD vendor automatically 8)

    "This file will take 2 days to download
    [Cancel] [Continue] [Fedex]"

  257. Check out DataBahn by Fofer · · Score: 1

    One of my clients has DirecWay - their offices are in a warehouse row where DSL and cable companies aren't available... and this is in L.A.! The speeds are so-so, but the download cap is annoying. In any case...

    At CES last week, DataBahn announced a satellite dish that provides satellite TV, unlimited broadband Internet access and up to ten telephone lines. It's the equivalent of a T1 telephone line (ostensibly, much faster than what DirecWay offers.)

    They have a portable unit (for boaters, RV'ers, etc.) for $4,000 and $79 a month.

    The company also has a permanently mounted dish for around $650 with $59 a month charges.

    888-GET-DATA

  258. I have DIRECWAY and... by starrsoft · · Score: 2, Informative

    its better than dial-up, but it has some rather crippling restrictions. Its fast for dloading, but you have about a 100 mb limit every hour or so (the so-called "Fair Use" policy) and then they cut you off. Also the thing you mentioned about lag :( Another thing, with snow like we have here in VA (read: not very much; usually about 2-5 in), there's about a 10% chance that the net stops working after a fresh snowfall (usually for anywhere from 5 hrs-2 days; you have backup dialup provided).

    Something that happened last year: We had snow. It started to melt. Big chunks slid off the metal roof. They took the coaxial cable with it. The upside was that the repairman was included free in the deal.

    File sharing especially invokes the "Fair Use" policy, you must either set low bandwith limits or just have it on for an hour at a time. The prob with that method is losing your place in someone's queue :(

    Web surfing is about the same speed as dial-up because of the lag time.

    Where sat. really shines is dloading; it's too bad that it has the restriction... Earthlink is my ISP; they of course use DIRECWAY. At the time Earthlink offered the exact same package as DIRECWAY for about $10 less a month.

    It's kinda amusing EARTHlink offering sat. net... :)

    --
    Read my blog: HansMast.com
  259. The trouble with 56k isn't speed... by aquarian · · Score: 1

    ...it's reliability. Now that broadband is taking over, dialup access has fallen by the wayside. Dial-in POPs have no capacity, aren't maintained properly, and reliability sucks. And the more you get out into the hinterland, where broadband access is a problem, the worse it is with dialup too. 56k? You're lucky if you can get 28k, and keep a connection for more than 5 minutes.

  260. Is wireless an option? by mpatmcg · · Score: 1

    How far out of Ann Arbor? I live in Ovid and get wireless access from this company:
    http://www.mutualdata.com/serviceareamap .htm

    This is a decent alternative for rural customers. There may be something similar available south of here.

    --
    We will keep re-defining success until we are sucessful.
  261. We'll help you test it by anticypher · · Score: 1

    CT,

    When you get your satellite connection set up, put your home server on it and post the link to the front page of /. For extra added incentive, link to photos of Nathalie Portman or your wife. If we don't knock the bird out of the sky, you'll know what kind of bandwidth you can sustain :-)

    In a slightly more serious vein, and back to the original topic, have you done some googling for T1 connectivity in Ann Arbor? From looking at some networking maps, there is a ton of excess capacity running through Ann Arbor, the UoM has a number of OC48 links to internet-2, there must have been excess capacity pulled through the city which some local ISPs have leased. A T1, if it doesn't cross a LATA boundary, is supposed to be dirt cheap in the U.S.

    For someone like you, with two hardcore geeks in the house, a permanently on T1 connection to an ISP with an almost-everyting-permitted AUP would probably not cost much more than the satellite connection. A /28 or /27 block of permanent IP addresses, maybe even IPv6, and you'll never be able to go back to dialup again. After a few months of paying US$150-$250/month, you'll justify it as a necessary luxury expense.

    the AC

    --
    Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
  262. DWay 6000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am using Mac OS X with the Dway 6000, in short it rocks. I have my Airport Extreme plugged into the router and use three OS X boxes with the system. My only complaint is upload speeds, if I am popping mail and sending a file via ftp there is not enough upload bandwidth remaining to sing on to instan messenger. Also, I tried downloading a 500mb linux image, no go. After 300mb worth of downloads in a three hour period your download speed drops to dialup speed.

    I have had zero issues since the installation, which was about three months ago (it was installed Nov. 17).

    The installation was problematic however, the installer didn't know anything about macs, and he had to use my iMac to configure the router. Also, there is a bug in the router that crops up during the dish pointing process, the signal strength never goes higher than 29, even if the signal strength is actually much higher. It took this guy all day to do the install, but like I said, since then service has been rock solid.

    Jason

  263. Another Option Altogether by drsmack1 · · Score: 1

    http://www.web-hopper.com/ These particular guys an in Cincinnati, OH. Q > How does WebHopper work? A > WebHopper receives downstream data via a digital television broadcast signal transmitted to a small antenna sitting on your desk. Upstream data continues to go through the phone line to your existing internet service provider. Q > How much does WebHopper cost? A > For a single residential connection, WebHopper's cost is comparable to that of other high-speed internet providers. A single monthly fee is billed to your credit card based upon the speed you select. Choose from 3 speed levels so you only pay for the speed you need! 256k speed is $29.95/month, 512k speed is $89.95/month, and 768k speed is $129.95/month.

  264. CDMA based alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    If you have cellular service in your area you can get a CDMA2000-based pcmcia card that will provide upto 144kbps upload and download. If your Cellular Service Provider is Verizon, in the very near future you could get upto 1Mbps speeds on the service. This 1x EV-DO (1Mbps) is already available in some parts of the US I believe.

    The card costs about $150, and the service is about $80 per month for unlimited data. Voice can be shared on the same link. I have tried this service from Verizon, Sprint and Cingular. Verizon and Sprint have the best speeds, while Verizon has the best coverage, atleast in the North-east where I live.

  265. Sprint PCS Wireless by ceics · · Score: 1

    I've got two clients on DirecWay, and it is basically useless except for basic web browsing. I'll not rehash all the previous comments.

    One solution I'd investigate if I were you is Cellular Wireless. Assuming true fixed wireless is unavailable, this solution may be.

    I'm using Sprint's PCSWireless product for mobile access and emergency internet usage in non-wired areas. It's a PCMCIA data modem that gets between 60-175K up and down transfer rate.

    Upside:
    * Latency is pretty low, and it works anywhere Sprint's PCS network is available.
    * $90/month unlimited bandwidth (they may have pulled this offer, but it's what I was able to get)
    * Great for travel. Compact, and pretty reliable once it's setup.

    Downside:
    * AFAIK, Windows only (you can move to the next post now).
    * Supreme pain in the ass to initially setup
    * Tech support that I'd rank as some of the worst in the business.
    * You'd have to run a computer with a PCMCIA slot as a router, and make sure it's got a good cellular signal

    If you can get somebody to write an open source driver for this puppy, it'd be great for SSH, or any other remote access, and you could use Satellite for large file transfers as well.

    AT&T, Cingular, and other providers are rumored to have similar products on the way as well.

    Sprint Hardware: http://www.sprint.com/pcsbusiness/devices/wireless _cards/index.html
    Rate Plans: http://www.sprint.com/pcsbusiness/plans/data/wirel ess_laptop.html

  266. You've been sleeping with his girlfriend? n/t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  267. 56k? by jgregs75 · · Score: 1

    You can't stream porn with that connection?

  268. middle of nowhere by TheOv3rminD · · Score: 0

    yeah i just moved to the middle of nowhere, maine....i thought i was gonna be screwed and have to use 56k. but as it turns out theres this little shed down the road that says verizon on the side. its kind of funny that the CO for my entire area is just a little shed but guess what it was wired for dsl! muahahahahahhahahahahaaha P.S. DirecWay Sucks

  269. Watch out for their "Fair Access Policy" by dclove · · Score: 1

    It's been years since I used their DirecWay service (it was DirecPC back then), but back then they were one of the slimiest companies around. That surprised me as I was, and still am, a DirecTV subscriber and have always been quite happy with that service.

    DirecPC implemented a "Fair Access Policy" (FAP) to try and reign in high-volume users, even though they sold the service as "unlimited internet". That, in itself, was understandable, but the way they implemented it was deplorable. I don't know if it's still around or not.

    At some arbitrary point, DirecPC would decided you'd violated the FAP (the limits of which were closely held secrets not to be divulged to mere mortals) and would drop your current connection. They'd subsequently throttle new connections down to about 300-450 baud for some unspecified period of time (usually several days). Worse, their "customer service" would never tell you if you'd actually been FAPed, leaving you to wonder if the problem would eventually rectify itself, or if you had a hardware or antenna-alignment issue that required action on your part. Coupled with their pathetic drivers which would frequently just stop working until the machine was power-cycled, you never really knew what the hell was going on.

    By way of example, I could always trigger a FAP violation by attempting to download one of the abundant MSVC patches. The patch weighed in at about 100MB, and DirecPC would always drop at 70MB and then be useless for the next three days. I actually had to fall back to a 28.8 modem to get the patches.

    I'm know they eventually settled a class-action suit over their FAP, but I don't remember the exact details. I do know I dropped them at that time and would never go back.

  270. Direcway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go to www.dslreports/forum/sat to find out about anything and everything Direcway. I am getting dsl, so if you want a used dw4000. :-)

    Biggest thing that is going to effect you is that uploads SUCK. Fap sucks, but if there is no alternative, it is a great solution.

  271. I got it, it worked, then I got DSL. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had the sat thing for a while. It worked fine. I just changed my TCP/IP settings in windows to compensate for the latency. I could download big files quickly. However, playing online games was a bit tiresome.

    If you need something better than 56k then I would say that the sat is alot better. However, Cable or DSL are much better.

  272. My experience with Direcway by Jediman1138 · · Score: 0

    Well, theres a hidden FAP of 500MB for 4 hours, then it reduces its throughput speed to about 20 k/bps. Then for me it costs $70 a month. Usually it never bogs down for me. Also, the speeds have been improving for me. I started out with about 100 kb on a good day, now its about 150 kbps on an average day. I don't know, I'd say go with somethin else if you can, if not, then this is alright until somethin better comes around.

    --

    nothing.can.stop.me.now

  273. Couple of points from a direcway (2 way) user by Lord+of+the+Files · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's hard to find this out, but the standard direcway service nat's you. You do not have a publically routable ip address, let alone a static one. Upgrading to a commercial package can get you a static ip. The nat boxes also tend to kill long running connections (i.e. if you leave ssh running logged in somewhere).

    The standard satellite modem (for lack of better name) doesn't work well in linux. Hughes has a patent on the LZJH compression algorithm. DirecWay forces you to use IP compression for port 80 connections with the LZJH compression algorithm. So linux drivers have trouble with web traffic.

    The latency is awful. During peak hours (afternoon on) ping times get up to 2 seconds. I've never seen them below 700 ms. Some web pages that open a lot of connections to download small items feel slower over the satellite link than over dial up.

    Finally Hughes has a fair access policy the details of which they won't share. As far as anyone can tell they're using token bucket qos with a bucket of about 150 megs and and a fill rate of 56kbps. What this means is that if you doenloaded nonstop all day you'd get 56kbps. You're just allowed to save up some of your bandwidth and use it all at once, so the connection feels faster.

    Weather has lousy effects on connection quality. Heavy cloud cover can mess it up occaisionally. Mostly though the problem is rain storms. A good thunder storm can knock out the connection completely until it passes. The DirecWay service is much more suceptible to weather related problems than satellite tv is.

    Essentially it's ok for large downloads (although be sure to find someone's script to tune the linux ip stack settings, or large downloads will stall partway through.) Most stuff is painful over it. We keep a dial up account with a local isp for ssh , and times the link isn't working. I'm a very unhappy customer. I didn't believe a lot of the complaints I read about DirecWay because the complaints were so negative they didn't sound believable. 4 hours after we had the installation completed I discovered that by and large the complaints are all true.

    --

    God does not play dice - Einstein

    Not only does God play dice, he sometimes throws them where they

  274. Re:Plenty of catches... Argh! First Admendment by nategasser · · Score: 1

    Learn what the First Amendment is before you wave it around. It (and the rest of the Bill of Rights) protects people from actions of the Government. That's it.

    It doesn't say a company can't offer you a contract that limits your ability to say nasty things about them. Breaking that contract gives them the right to cancel your service, not send you to jail or anything.

    Bugs me when people don't understand their own rights.

  275. Past One-Way Satelite User by QCH2002 · · Score: 1

    Well... I had DirectPC from Best Buy a few years ago and my father-in-law still has it running. It is the one-way satelite. He lives too far away to be able to get DSL or Cable. He is also too cheap to fork out $$$ for anything but dial-up. I used the DirectPC and very seldom had problems. In really bad storms, we would lose power and phone but since I had my PC and Satelite on UPS, I still had internet. That's sweet. If the only option is Dial-up or Satelite, go satelite. IMHO

  276. My experience with DirectWay by dszd0g · · Score: 5, Informative

    First of all, make sure you are not "powered by" anyone. Earthlink and AOL resell the service and most people quickly want to get out of that situation. Earthlink and AOL have really bad support and slower downloads speeds then DirectWay directly.

    It is 128kbps up and 400kbps down peak (For reference a T1 is 1540kbps up and down). It's expensive. I didn't realize it was $100/month for the first year and $60/month after that, but it is a two way Satellite system and those are still expensive. Most users seem to get better than 400kbps down, but somewhere around 30-80kbps up. With the one-way (dial-up systems) most users get 18-28kbps up due to the overhead in their protocol.

    No phone line is required with the two-way system. There are one-way and two-way services offered.

    This is something I wrote when I had the system and using it over SSH:

    "I am typing this e-mail over our new DirectWay system, and it is extremely painful. It is far worse than dial-up. Every character I type takes
    about one second to appear. I have to count the number of backspaces I want, number of arrow keys, etc.

    C:\>ping [My ssh box hosted at Hurricane Electric]

    Pinging [My ssh box] [1.2.3.4] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 1.2.3.4: bytes=32 time=1012ms TTL=242
    Reply from 1.2.3.4: bytes=32 time=861ms TTL=242
    Request timed out.
    Request timed out.

    Ping statistics for 1.2.3.4:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 2, Lost = 2 (50% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 861ms, Maximum = 1012ms, Average = 468ms

    Ignore the average, Microsoft apparently counts dropped packets as 0ms.

    I seem to be getting about 900ms ping times on average to most fast sites. We are getting about 750ms on average to the first hop.

    The speeds vary a lot. When I did a speed test earlier I got 252kbps down/18kbps up. Right now I am getting a lot better:

    CA server:

    Test running.........
    **Speed 827(down)/25(up) kbps **
    (At least 16 times faster than a 56k modem)

    LA server:

    Test running.........
    ** Speed 653(down)/51(up) kbps **
    (At least 13 times faster than a 56k modem)

    (For comparison to what I got when I was on cable modem:
    2002-03-05 23:03:40 Speed test (la) 780/124 kbps
    2002-03-05 22:58:28 Speed test (wc) 772/109 kbps )

    I also did the toast.net speed test and got a bit worse results, you can
    see them here:
    My toast results

    I disabled their proxy server to speed up Web browsing, but their software comes up with annoying pop-ups that tell me that I am not using their proxy. I will set it back when I am done. Speed tests do not work through proxies, so that is the main reason I disabled it.

    It took me about 20 minutes to write this e-mail and the connection dropped once during writing it."

    I use SSH so much that I went back to dial-up before the trial period ended. I get about 150ms over a 56K connection so SSH is about 6 times slower. Web browsing wasn't improved enough to make the service worth it. Some sites seemed slower even. I believe it was any HTTPS sites like checking my bank account were terrible.

    DSL reports has a FAQ available. It is a good site to check out when looking at new ISPs.
    DSL Reports Satellite FAQ

    --
    This message is encrypted with Quad ROT-13 to protect the author's copyright under the DMCA.
  277. FAQ says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Q: Why does the service slow down when used in conjunction with a VPN?

    A: Our communication satellite is located over 22,000 miles from Earth. Each data packet must be sent down separately and acknowledged by the remote site. This process takes time. In order to expedite the delivery of data packets to our end-users, HUGHES has developed a patented technology for aggregating those packets and sending all of them down simultaneously. VPNs encrypt each data packet, which prevents our technology from aggregating the data packets and reduces the throughput significantly.

    I think this would also cause problems with SSH given the similarity of the technologies.

  278. And I got all excited... by TheTranceFan · · Score: 1
    ...because I thought we were talking about this old friend!

    Digital oscillators and six analog filters (I've got a DW8000, its successor).

  279. Re:Your Licensing Fee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am interested in purchasing your ($699 Licensing Fee ) which price is
    ($1499) and don't worry about the shipping agent I have a shipping
    agent that will carter for the shipment I have a client in US who
    is owing me ($3000). And he has promise that he will be sending the
    certified cashier check down on my behave, I want you Have it in mind
    that the remaining balance of the excess fund will be wire via money
    gramm to the shipping agent who is coming for the pick up. If this
    mode of payment is accept by you I will like you to send your Full
    name and address including your cell phone number in which you will
    Receive a certified check drawn in U.S funds.
    Regards.
    I WILL BE WAITING FOR YOUR IMMEDIATE RESPONSE.

  280. It sucks. Go with Starband by mikeswi · · Score: 1

    The most comprehensive FAQ that I know of about Direcway is at BBR.

    I've had Direcway since December 2002. In short, it sucks, but at least it ain't dialup.

    The lag is god awful. Minimum latency, by the laws of physics, is 600ms, and more usually twice that. Forget ever playing any online game. Pages take nearly 5 seconds to even begin loading. FTP and email are so painfully slow you want to gouge out your eyes.

    The download speed can't be beat (depending on what satellite/transponder they activate you on), but upload is a joke. All customers on a transponder fight for the same 128kbps upload speed. Dialup is better and more reliable for uploading any file larger than 20kb. When you do upload something, don't hold your breath because you will probably max out at 20-45kbps.

    Yes, rain/snow/heavy cloud cover knocks it offline. Since you're in the north, it will go down easier than it would here (weaker signal the further north you are). I usually have to cycle the modems when the rain knocks it off. It fills up with static (probably could be grounded better).

    This probably won't apply to the new Dway 6000, but the model I have (4000 I think) has software which Direcway uses for A.) Remote Access and B.) Popping up full page advertisements. See here for details.

    Tech support is a joke. Don't bother. Go to Copperhead or BBR if you need help.

    I don't know about the newer system, but I'm behind a NAT (and I think this applies to everyone unless you pay for a static IP). You cannot run a server because of the NAT. SSH probably won't work. I can't use VNC unless someone on the server side initiates a client connection to me first.

    Then, there is FAP. FAP (Fair Access Policy) is a joke. If you download more than 169MB within 4 hours, they firewall your connection. They claim they throttle it to dialup speed, but that is a lie. The internet connection dies for hours after the FAP kicks in. If you decide to download a .ISO or other large file, use dialup because it'll download slower but in much less time than trying to work around FAP.

    I would suggest taking a very hard look at Starband before spending any money with Direcway. I plan to switch to them myself as soon as I can afford to do so because of Direcway's popping up ads on my PC. I need to recover from Christmas first.

  281. Throttling by Webmoth · · Score: 1

    My favorite download manager is wget (if RMS is reading this, I really meant to say GNU wget). Thankfully, I don't have a DirecWay connection, but if I did, I'd make use of the --limit-rate option.

    Wget has been ported to Windows, too.

    --
    Give me my freedom, and I'll take care of my own security, thank you.
  282. Satellite sucks. We are stuck with it right now. by Franciscan · · Score: 1

    We are located in the biggest city in Canada, Toronto, population of the greater toronto area is between 4-6 million, which is above 15% of the population of the entire country, so of course, it makes sense that we can't get any high speed internet access where we're located.
    Okay, the deal is that we're too far (by a little margin) from the CO to use Bell's DSL service, and Rogers doesn't have cable internet available on our little side-street, which is only one block away from Kennedy/Ellesmere, a fairly major intersection. The buildings right behind us on Kennedy road all have high speed internet access (choice of DSL and Cable), but not us, we're in some backwater industrial park in middle-scarberia, and we're out of luck.

    Anyways, the problems with satellite are:

    1. The drivers for the 2-way satellite modems suck, they crash regularly. The drivers are available for Windows only, not for linux.
    2. The NOC (operations center) in Texas goes down more often than [insert colorful image not suitable for younger slashdotters here].
    3. The satellite link becomes unavailable whenever heavy rain or snow gets in between our dish and the satellite, or between the satellite and the NOC downlink in texas.
    4. The latency is terrible. Ssh remotely sucks. You could download small pages ( 5. Get used to hitting reload a lot on your browser. First try didn't work, try try again.
    6. Don't ever ever try to use WinGate with your Satellite access, trust me on this one. And pay extra for a public IP, so you can use a NAT firewall/gateway in your home or office.

    Regards,

    Someone who has been there.

  283. I use a DirecWay reseller by markd · · Score: 1
    I have my satellite internet through a group called SkyCasters (http://skycasters.com), since they explicitly say they support non-windows platforms (Mac OS X in particular for me). I have a DW4020 stack - transmit unit, receive unit, and a simple cisco switch on my network. I just point my machines to it for routing. Support with them has been pretty good, even though if you're having problems with internet software (like IRC or AIM), they won't help you. I've never had more than a 5 minute wait when calling support. They're geared to supporting the business customer rather than the end-user PC rabble.

    I haven't experienced any of the problems folks here have mentioned, like download throttling. I get the same download speeds at any time during the day, no matter how much I've downloaded up to that point. Connectivity tends to be pretty good. High-overcast days are the worst, since apparently that bounces around the transmit signal. Rainy days and snowy days generally aren't a problem (as long as I keep the dish swept off when it snows)

    The latency sucks, of course. It's still overall faster than the dialup and ISDN I used to have (which the satellite has replaced). Once the data starts flowing, its great. Forget about online games, and ssh is hugely frustrating for more than a couple of minutes. I end up doing a lot of work locally, then uploading the results, rather than doing the work directly on the remote box.

  284. Had it. Hated it. Disconnected it. by alamut · · Score: 2, Informative
    ... Never looked back.

    I had a similar problem. Bought a new house recently, in the middle of a minor city. Before signing the papers i checked with both DSL carriers and digital cable to insure availabilty.

    both assured me that all was well.

    deal signed, place dsl order and discover that their confirmation of service was based on the zip code. sure, i'm in the same zip code as all those tall buildings, but i am 17,000 feet from the CO.

    UGH! same story with cable.

    so, thinking i was clever i signed up for dirctwav. ponied up about a grand in equipment and installation costs. and had it installed.

    let the horror begin!

    first off, you have to have a windows (and now mac, so i have heard) machine to act as your modem. you have to run a user-land appliction to enable access to the radio. it is less than stable software.

    second, you have to use ICS to share it. i initially tried ISS, thinking it'd be nice to have a firewall on my gateway, but ISS would not consistently use the radio modem. so, i had all kinds of crap bridged into my network.

    third, the data satellite view is narrow. i mean NARROW. nothing more frustrating than having no data connectivity while your directtv signal strength is 98+, just because of a light wind. no matter how often it happens (which was a lot!) you dont get used to it.

    did i mention that it takes a good 2 minutes to re-aquire a signal lock?

    after months of lost connections, low bandwidth, and a two solid week stint of downtime (which they wouldnt reimburse me for) i stumbled across the last straw.

    there is a limit to the "unlimited" use. Hit their threshold (which is never quantitaivly defined by their contract or customer service) and they slap you down to 32K. yes. less than half of dialup. for up to 8 hours!

    i found this out after my aformentioned 2week downtime was fixed and was retreiving all my mail to my local servers. too much data, and i was limited.

    i used my modem, found a local wireless provider, they cam on site that day and set me up with 1.5down/768up (+ static IP space) for half the price.

    i called and cancelled directv. and gave them a piece of my mind.

    if i hadnt found the wireless, i probably would have set up a double dialout solution, 100K would have been faster than i was ever able to get from directwav.

    in short, its expensive and it sucks.

    (i'll sell you the modem and dish, cheep!)

    1. Re:Had it. Hated it. Disconnected it. by demachina · · Score: 1

      Like most of the replies to this story your bitching about the old DW4000 modems. The question asked is about the new DW6000. Two completely different setups. I'm sitting here typing this on a Linux laptop through a DW6000. The Windows XP machine in the house is shut off and so is ICS. ICS did suck when I had the DW4000 but its no longer relevent to this discussion.

      As for your pointing problems it sounds like your installer did a shitty job. Our dish has been up for over a year and I dont recall it ever losing lock due to wind and its been through some howling storms. It does need a solid mount and you really need to use 1 or 2 of the extra braces in the kit. You also need to keep the coax run to a minimum between the modem and the dish to minimize attenuation in the cable. The DW6000 is a compact little appliance so you can put it out of the way and close to the dish and run Ethernet twisted pair to the rest of the house. It pays to keep the coax short and the signal strength high so you have a margin for error for wind, rain, snow, whatever. We get 95% signal strength and could do better if we moved the DW6000. When we ran it the DW4000 needed to be close to the Windows computer that ran it through USB.

      Certainly wireless is better if you can get it but if your really out in the country its usually not readily available and it remains to be seen if the companies trying to provide it in rural areas will make enough money to stay afloat.

      --
      @de_machina
  285. Not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The local telco may charge so much for it that it ends up in their annual profit report, but they have to provide it.

    Not quiet, at least in our parts. Qwest (aka Qworst to the locals) has refused on the grounds that they have no available facilities and would have to completely re-engineer facilities at a community level to handle the extra capacity. City council threats, intervention by the state governor, etc. have not changed their behavior - in fact, one major packing house employer in a community of less than 2,000 had to buy off a T1 from the local bank, freeing up the capacity in order to get one.

    Another large incumbant LEC in the state (but not an RBOC) got a $5/line "broadband subsidy" tucked into the local residential and business phone service rate. Does this mean they're bringing DSL to small communities and farms? No. But it sure helps their financial statement look prettier.

    Unfortunately, as they've been granted a cash cow monopoly, the grant took away the interest in reinvesting in it. State-level regulators got what their politics designed (and the LEC lobby ensures the cash keeps flowing to keep any ideas of progress from emerging).

  286. OMG! Just buy it and then tell us how it is! by zapster · · Score: 1

    Then compare it to wireless if you can get it. If not then look into setting up your own wireless ISP setup. If you write a story about the experience isn't it a business expense?

  287. Way. by MsGeek · · Score: 1

    It's $20 if you are a T-Mobile customer, and it's all-you-can-eat. It's only at modem speed, but I can live with that. It's also more secure than using an 802.11b public hotspot. With GPRS packet data transfer you are behind T-Mobile's NAT rather than being nekkid to the world and r00table. Unless, of course you run something like Zone Alarm in Windows or have the firewall active in Linux/BSD/MacOS X.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  288. Look at other alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used the DirectWay (business account) system for over a year. It is useful and can be a decent connection, but it will never quite feel like real broadband. Also, be aware that unless you get a static IP and a business account the IP you get is goofy and makes using things like a VPN difficult or impossible. With the static IP and bigger account my bill was $115 per month.

    In my situation I had only SAT or a 19.2K average dialup available, so my choices were limited. If I had the ability to get a solid 44K+ dialup connection I would have looked into maybe a dual modem system.

    Also, consider ISDN. I was too far away (not enough F1 pairs in QWest speak), but if it's available you get decent bandwidth and low latency. An ISDN router will give digital phone connectivity and pretty speedy (all things being relative) connectivity.

    Good luck.

  289. A proper reply by brad_brown · · Score: 1

    I came up with a website that tells of people's experience with DirecWay. Doesn't sound like DirecWay is worth it. http://www.thesqueakywheel.com/complaintlist.cfm?I D=2503

  290. I use it with Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have used the DirecWay service back when it was still owned by earthlink. At the time you still needed to have a dial up to send but recieved over satalite link. We got one of the new devices to use and it works great. I have always been able to ssh out from the it. I can also VPN. It rocks, especially if you are no where near cable or DSL. This is also within 2 hours of Ann Arbor (Grand Rapids).
    --BigJoe

  291. I'm doing exactly that by neonfrog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You can get Multilink routers for next to nothing on Ebay. I have priced nearly everything as far as rural broadband in the 48th worst state in the union for broadband penetration - Vermont. I am currently using 2 USR 56k modems and a Webramp 350e (Ramp Networks is out of business) all purchased on Ebay. Alternately I have built a working router for this using Win98SE so I'm sure YOU can kludge together a Linux-flavored one.

    I often have a downlink of 50.666kb x2 and an uplink of 33.6kb x 2. I can even use it to play WolfET on occassion, though it isn't great -- ~200ms pings at best which isn't terrible for a Field Ops calling in airstrikes :-) but is terrible for sniping with a Covert Ops :-( Think flamethrower rather than pistol...

    I can only download about a single gB per day under the best of circumstances but my ISP has no FAP about it.

    Yes, it's 2 phone lines. Yes I pay the full local usage cap each month. But even with my Multilink ISP account ($30/mo) it is less than a single phone line plus $99 DirecWay fee (if you pay for the hardware over year). I have done spreadsheet after spreadsheet on the comparisons and I feel the dual modems are the way to go.

    --

    I'm thinking about it, therefore I might be.

    1. Re:I'm doing exactly that by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      With the price of the DirecWay service he's talking about, I think quad modems could be economical. I just can't figure out how to find ISPs that support it. (No big deal for me. I'm just looking so I can find a relevant link and impress Taco.)

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    2. Re:I'm doing exactly that by neonfrog · · Score: 1

      My ISP, Sover.net, has at least dual Multilink PPP. I just called and asked. It was a whopping $10 extra a month for one extra dial in. I have not asked about 3 modems, which my equipment can do, because I don't feel it's worth it at this time. My impression is that if they can handle ISDN dial-in, then they are setup for Multilink.

      Quad modems sounds neat, but I think in reality the cost of 2 modems is more in line with the cost of regular DirecWAY (unless you're looking at the business class levels?). I've done this research a lot. $$$ for $$$ my two modems are nearly identical in cost to a consumer grade satellite account, but I have no usage cap. Even though the bandwidth is burstably less, I don't get the door slammed with 1 ISO image.

      --

      I'm thinking about it, therefore I might be.

    3. Re:I'm doing exactly that by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      My understanding from other posts is that in order to get the special no-windows-necessary modem, you need to spend $600 + ~$90/mo. If that's the case, then he could easily, easily do quad multilink for the same price.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    4. Re:I'm doing exactly that by neonfrog · · Score: 1

      Let's see if you're right.

      Quad modems requires 4 phone lines. Maybe 5 if you also want a dedicated voice line, but I'll exclude that. Not even discussing multiplexer issues he might have by not having enough pairs run near his house (cost to run more (not included in math below) or degraded service being the only recourse) you have:

      4 x Basic Phone Service @ $15 each = $60/mo

      4 x maxed out/unlimited local usage (just gonna happen) @ $15 = another $60/month

      I'm underestimating those numbers. I currently pay more than that but I'm not knowledgeable about service everywhere.

      Multilink service provider @ $30 (what I pay for 2) up to $50 or more/month.

      So not counting for any special services like persistent dialup or fixed IP, just getting the bloody things all talking to the internet at the same time is $150 - $200 a month or more.

      For equipment you want decent modems and probably externals. Nice new USRs will run you $75 each so $300 there. You also need a router. Go for a hardware device like I use and you have very few new options if any. My used one was around $70 but can only do 3 modems and has no tech support. Throw in some cabling and you are up to $400 initial hardware cost on the low end with used, no tech support equipment.

      No router? Gonna do a PC? Well that machine costs money, but we'll exclude it since all of us geeks have spare towers kicking around just waiting to consume yummy kilowatt hours each month (again, this measurable and sometimes considerable cost excluded from the discussion). The modems will NOT be much cheaper because you cannot often get a fleet of PCI winmodems all living in harmony -- they usually need to be DSP based models so $40 - $50 each. If you're gonna do external then you need additional serial cards as you also probably cannot get a fleet of USB modems (see external costs above) working very easily (see winmodem issue).

      To wrap up:

      quad modems 1st year cost = $2200 (excludes phone line installation costs and possible power consumption issues, includes some used equipment and performing initial setup yourself) future years = $1800 MINIMUM (see multiple exclusions and under-estimations above)

      satellite 1st year cost = $1680, future years = $1080 (though it should be closer to $120/month business class (higher FAP, etc) which is 1st year cost = $2040, future years = $1440)

      I'm not sure you can really interpret that as nearly the same price. Respectfully, I will not concede the "easily, easily" part at all. :-)

      I have hours and hours into spreadsheeting this puzzle for myself. Considering my wants and needs (occassional gaming (equivalent to low latency for SSH requirement), wife doing online courses, wife working from home (accountant), wife browsing seamlessly, bandwidth on demand, occaissional ISO downloads (burstably slower than SAT but no FAP)) I will stick with my 2 modems. I MIGHT even consider adding a 3rd modem though the monthly cost is pushing nearly twice satellite. I just can't cope with the latency & FAP issues of a satellite.

      --

      I'm thinking about it, therefore I might be.

    5. Re:I'm doing exactly that by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Fair enough :)

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  292. DirecWay support staff ignorant, actively hostile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    When the service works, it kind of works. The service is over-sold, yet HNS says the business model is not making money. Latency is very high. SSH has up to 2 second turn around on what you type. FTP upload to update website is horrible.

    I have the DW4000 and am using a Win2K machine as a (poor) gateway (via ICS, which sucks rocks). I considered upgrading to their DW6000, and called their tech support to ask some questions about the capability of the DW6000. I recognized their canned responses and asked to speak to an engineer. Eventually their support personel became actively hostile and rude.

    The last person I spoke with was a manager, who told me a few gems like:

    • "Most commercial WAN routers cannot do NAT."
    • "I've never heard of a router that can perform address translation."
    • "That information [on how to configure your DW6000] is proprietary."


    Before you do business with DirecWay, do some googling:

    • http://www.google.com/search?q=direcway+sucks

  293. Re:Do we have a buyer for Iridium? by publiusREX · · Score: 1

    That was one way to get continuous coverage in LEO.
    Maybe 802.16 will solve Taco's BW problem.

  294. Long range Ethernet by macdaddy · · Score: 1
    Buy your local loop guys a case of the good stuff and buddy up to them. See if they'd consider helping you set up a long range Ethernet link. it's quite possible and works well from all accounts I've heard. From the telco's perspective it takes a copper pair, tiny amount of rack space, and a enet port on a router or switch plus labor. The hardware isn't cheap. From what I last heard it's around $700 a port. If you buy the hardware, pay them something reasonable for the install, and something reasonable for a monthly BW charge, you should be all set. My local provider (and contract employer) offers dialup, cable, and DSL. They are also the local telco (very handy). They have set up long range DSL via unused fiber pairs before. They are also testing long range Ethernet. LR Enet is pumping out 1-3Mbps. Not too shabby. Wireless access is hopefully going to be considered soon.

    Basically see if your telco will set up a LR Enet link if you pay for the HW, something for install, and something for monthly BW charges. They might just bite.

  295. DW6000 and DW4020 by eurosat · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hi :)

    You can use SSH over the DW6000 and DW4020 , which are basically the same things, the DW6000 is a DW4020 that has been scaled down and integrated into
    one Box.

    I am using a DW4020 myself, I am in Europe so I do not know what grade of service you'll be getting in USA. But here we get up to 256Kbps/2Mbps , I personnally use the 128Kbps/2Mbps service right now on a DW4020 and I already have my DW6000 , just need to plug it in to replace my DW4020 :)

    Oh I use FreeBSD behind it and I do all my sysadmin work from it :) (yes including some things considered not possible on a such satellite system like VPN (you'll need to encrypt only payload for this, for technical reasons that I'll gladly explain if you want me to)

    Also to mention : I admin and install these systems and I know these babies quite well ,HNS has been good to me :)

    You can contact me if you need to know more

  296. And it gets worse... by MoebiusStreet · · Score: 1

    10. USE AND CONTROL OF INFORMATION; MEMBER COMMUNICATION; ADS

    We may, without obligation, liability or notice, except to the extent prohibited by applicable law, distribute, loan, sell or otherwise share with other persons or entities user lists as well as aggregate information. ...This shall not be construed to limit our use of other information not addressed in this Section 10. ... We may also from time to time provide online, telefax, telephone, email, mail and other communications to our Subscribers and users on matters pertaining to the Service, its features, its sponsors or its use without compensation to them or reimbursement of costs for doing so. ....

    You also acknowledge that advertising and promotion may occur on the Service and also that neither you nor any user shall in any event have any claim with respect to any proceeds from such activities.

  297. DirecWay blows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So I recently used a friends DirecWay system, and they asked me to hook it up to wireless router. First of all, the thing uses two modems, one to receive and one to transmit. The only output on the modem (to the computer) was USB. Meaning connecting it to a router wasn't going to happen (without a bunch of weird connections). Not to mention the speeds sucked at about 500k max.

  298. I dropped a T-1 circuit, installed DirecWay by John+Murdoch · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hi!

    I'm in rural America, and I've used a variety of methods for Internet access over the years: a 56K frame-relay circuit, ISDN, a fractional T-1 circuit, and now DirecWay. Some thoughts:

    • DirecWay ain't a T-1 circuit
      There is little comparison. The "two-way" DirecWay service is high-speed download, and essentially 56K upload. If you're doing a lot of uploading (particularly of graphics) that's a bad thing. If you're uploading text, it isn't that noticeable. On the other hand, you definitely will notice the latency. It's annoying.

      On the other hand, DirecWay is dramatically cheaper. You can buy the "modem" up front and pay $59/month, or capitalize the "modem" over 15 months for a total charge of $99/month; after 15 months your rate drops to $59/month. I viewed the cost of the device as equivalent to buying a router--its a capital expense. I can tell you with a broad smile on my face that $59/month is a LOT cheaper than the $450/month I was paying for a fractional T-1. (I dropped the T because I'm no longer doing offsite development for clients--I took a full-time position, so I don't have as much need for the bandwidth.)
    • You will need two dishes
      We learned this the hard way: DirecWay and DirecTV actually broadcast from different satellites. The way they provide service from both is to aim the dish at a compromise position. The result is poor signal strength from either TV or Internet. Our satellite guy came out last week, saying that DirecWay had emailed all of their installers to install a separate TV dish. It makes your roof more cluttered ("I heard you went to work for client," said a neighbor. "Was it the NSA?") but it will definitely settle the question of who is the biggest geek on the block.
    • Once you're past the latency, it rocks
      Once you're past that initial latency hit, download speed is remarkable. While there were benefits to having the T-1 circuit, I'm 28,000 feet from the CO, so packet loss was a persistent problem. Internet radio is better, and watching broadband TV is MUCH better.

    Overall, we're very happy with it.

  299. Direcway slower than dirt by rf33 · · Score: 1

    I had direcway when I lived out in the sticks (up till about 2 months ago), and I can tell you from firsthand experience that it is miserable. The throughput is great, but the latency makes browsing (especially anything ssl) painful. If you are doing large file transfers, it really does go pretty fast, sometimes faster than my current cable modem. But for ordinary web browsing, it is really the pits. Also if you are uploading anything to a site, it is extra painful, because their upload speed is pretty slow and you have the latency too. A double whammy. If there is any possibility of getting anything else (ISDN, etc), I would certainly go that route first. If your only choices are DW or dialup, I guess I would pick Direcway.

  300. direcway by orrinrule · · Score: 2, Insightful

    we have had direcway in our real estate office for about a year now and it is ok. I have a cable connection at home, so I usually compare it to the adelphia connection. Cable seems more responsive when surfing the web, but on downloads sometimes it goes faster then the adelphia. Things to keep in mind. Mount the dish good. Sometimes ice or rain can take ours out and we just have to wait until it can connect again. The new satelite modem should fix the messy internet connection sharing issues (we deal with it ok) The latentcy seems to affects other programs too, like streaming video or some instant messaging. Sometimes these things bog down. If I want to watch a CNET video at work I have to put it on 56k to get a non-rebuffering video. Excessive use during the day doesn't seem to affect us, but then again I can't tell that my cable connection gets overloaded durring the day either, so I'm probably not a good judge of that. Upload is slower then download. I wouldn't want to host anything on it, unless it was serving a few users at a time and it wasn't an intense job.

  301. 50km WiMax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'll probably want to do anything except something that requires signing a contract for an extended period of time. Looks like 50km WiMax might be just what you want:
    http://slashdot.org/articles/04/01/26/06420 0.shtml ?tid=126&tid=137&tid=187&tid=193&tid=9 5

  302. Modem is slow in boonies by Farmbubba · · Score: 1

    If you do live out in the boonies, you may only connect at 24,000 baud... You thing the 1 second lag time is unacceptable!

  303. Similar Experience Here ... and I live close you by Luscious868 · · Score: 1

    I live about 40 minutes away from Ann Arbor, MI and I tried DirecWay about a year ago. I had a very similar experience to the parent poster. Stay the hell away from DirecWay, it's pretty much worthless. You'll be down all the time, have to reboot a few times a day when it's working to keep it working and the tech support is horrible. If you absolutely have to be able to download large files quickly I guess it's worth it if there is no other alternative but be sure to keep your dial-up account. Trust me. You'll need it.

  304. Damn. by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    I thought I was in the middle of nowhere. No cable, no DSL. A Wireless link is coming, but yeah.

  305. No way-dial a crap. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " or crappy dialup."

    Maybe dialup wouldn't be so crappy, if the Internet wasn't so bloated. People do web pages like modern programmers do software. Lazy and bloated.

    1. Re:No way-dial a crap. by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Maybe dialup wouldn't be so crappy, if the Internet wasn't so bloated. People do web pages like modern programmers do software. Lazy and bloated.

      I'm relatively sure that the internet isn't the cause of a modem connection getting less than 40K download speed.
      Try downloading updates with a modem, it physically hurts.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  306. T1 + Wireless here in Santa Fe by 0wen · · Score: 1

    I agree with the folks suggesting T1 + wireless for neighbors. A very successful service here in Santa Fe is La Canada wireless, which as earlier folks mention, share a T1 with very simple 802.11 wireless, building a very effective network for those unable to get a cable modem or DSL. Indeed, they would not now change, even if cable/DSL did become available.
    http://www.lcwireless.com/

  307. I find it odd...What's good for the goose... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " but we get so much of it during the work week that we really don't care much about having broadband at home."

    Do telemarketers and helpdesk have phones at home?

  308. It's not that bad by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

    Damn people, I don't know what you people are smoking but its not that bad. Taco, if you want to know about direcway, look up my email address and mail me. I'll tell you all about it, pros and cons.

    --

    Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

  309. Re:Abuse?! by ByteHog · · Score: 1

    How exactly does is this abuse?

    He didn't submit a story, then accept it himself (quad karma!), and it is his site to begin with.

    --
    - This isn't the sig you're looking for. Move along, move along..
  310. Re:I'm happy with it-downgrading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " You really can never go back after you have broadband."

    You can if the economy tanks and your job goes to India, while you end up working at Walmart.

  311. The bounce to the bird by budgenator · · Score: 1

    The bounce to the bird is irrelevant for downloads and uploads (you only experience the lag once),

    My experience seems different, FTP upload speed has a major suckage factor; there is just too much hand shaking going on. In fact if you're uploading a new website, with a lot of directory depth and a ton of smallish file, 56K dial-up will kick digital satelites ass up arround it's ears.

    Satelite is optimized from cramming data down, not up.Of course if your just web browsing mostly, it'll make quite a difference, if the server your browsing can keep up

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    1. Re:The bounce to the bird by kfg · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I should have been more explicit and said "per file." The only situation I have when I'm dealing with webpages allows me to zip 'em up and send 'em to someone else who uploads them to the site. I don't do site maintainence. Just code/content dicking.

      Personally I'd far rather have dialup than satellite, but Taco's milage would probably be very different than mine.

      KFG

  312. What about both satellite and modem? by sben · · Score: 1

    Just a thought: Use the 56kbps modem for latency-sensitive purposes (e.g. SSH, where throughput isn't so important), and use satellite for browsing, downloading, etc.

  313. Re:No way-monopolys. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "If you have the $$$ there is nothing stopping you from getting a T1. You can get a T1 just about anywhere. The local telco may not like it, but they have to provide it."

    That's why John Navas says that there's no broadband monopoly. There is always an alternative. Just not necessarily the desired one.

  314. Re:Cooking Spray by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

    BEFORE it snows! :P

    --
    -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  315. DirectWay AKA DirecPC by LandGator · · Score: 1

    My wife's business had them, for just about as long as it took the owner to actually touch a terminal. Drove everyone in her office stark raving. Not only latency but the "now you're up, now you're down", the DNS failures, on and on and nobody gave a hoot at Direc*.

    The heavy caching was problematic, as was web surfing; it actually behaved somewhat well when doing larg file downloads, but the bazillions of little files and requests attendant to modern web surfing was sloooooooooooooww.

    My favorite curmudgeon, Jerry Pournelle, also had their service. He had rather unkind things to say about them on multiple occasions. http://www.jerrypournelle.com/cgi-bin/perlfect/sea rch/search.pl?p=1&lang=en&include=&exclude=&penalt y=0&mode=all&q=DirecPC

    Robert X. Cringely surveyed the competition, and also found them wanting:
    http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpi t20010201. html
    http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit200 10125. html

    The bottom line is, ya canna' change the laws o' physics, as a wise Scot once said. Perhaps you could instead consider some guerilla wireless?

    http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit2001062 8. html
    http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit200 10712. html
    http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit200 40115. html

    May I be so bold as to refer you to some good sources for WIFi wireless antenna making?

    http://www.trevormarshall.com/biquad.htm
    http:/ /trevormarshall.com/waveguides.htm
    http://www.tre vormarshall.com/byte_articles/byte1. htm

    Or, Ham Radio Outlet allows you to buy ready-made high-gain WiFi sticks.
    http://hamradio.com/

    Of course, you could face technical difficulties, either from hams (like me) with *licenses* to put kilowatts on 2.4gHz, or this kinda problem:
    http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpi t20010823. html

    Maybe you could get a 'dry pair' from Telco and roll your own:
    http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit200 10823. html

    However, hams are reasonable guys, and lighting using WiFi never really caught on, so I think guerilla WiFi is a safe bet, and cheap, too. If there is a stong emitter in your 'hood, just shift to 802.11a on 5gHz and carry on. Visit these guys
    http://www.personaltelco.net/static/index.ht ml
    for more info and lots of enthusiastic help for the esteemed Cmdr. Taco, really.

    73s and best regards,,

    K7AAY, PDX

    --
    There is nothing wrong with yr Internet. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are controlling the transmission - NSA
  316. Re:DirecWay support staff ignorant, actively hosti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    google for "DirecWay sucks": 45
    google for "DirecWay rocks": 1 to "about 5"

  317. not bad IF you know what you are doing by Velda · · Score: 1

    We use a direct way setup for our emergency response communications and some local high speed multimedia needs. Since our station isnt stationary we had a person attend their instillation training and then come back to teach us what he learned. Most people that have major packet loss just have bad reception. While we have never played games, we Have transferred VoIP communications and emergency mailing with little trouble.

    the key is a proper setup. i believe most instillation technicians do not do a very good job with this, probably because it isnt easy. for us, we must obtain our precise location using GPS, call their operations number over a satellite phone, give them our cords, wait for them to open a channel for us, and then carefully aim the dishes and adjust polarity to the information they calculate. there are systems that do this automatically in under 10 minutes but we can not afford them. in good conditions it takes us about a half hour to complete.

    as for weather interference its all about the condition of the dishes. if you shell the dish properly you shouldnt have any problem. we have had very nice dB gain during some pretty nasty storms.

    if you can justify the price and dont expect it to be the greatest thing on earth then you might want to give it a try. realistically it is a very good service. people fail to consider the complexity of its nature and expect it to be better than is possible.

  318. Can't get Broadband in San Jose... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "Do *try* to recall that broadband isn't available everywhere."

    You said it, I live in San Jose, CA(the so-called capitol of Silicon Valley) and can barely even get a dialtone. The closest thing I can get to broadband is an I-SDL line, 128kbps for $79.95/month! Cable Internet isn't available in the majority of the city, and I'm too far from the CO to get a regular DSL line. I would go with Satellite, but I wanna play games.

  319. Direcway by Myrmidon_451 · · Score: 1

    Have had the service for 13 months now. I live in a rural area and no DSL or cable etc. I have had some times when I had a hard time. This was when it rains real hard, or there are big T storms in the area. I was told by Direcway about this in advance. I have noticed some degradation in speed during congested times. I hear the new 6000 is faster than my 4000.

  320. i use a setup similar by goshurtall · · Score: 1

    the company i work for is part of the oil industry and we use similar satillite versions. We use the 4000 and 4020 direcway. The 6000 that you are talking about is called Spaceway. Spaceway is the consumer version and Direcway is the business version. System reliablity is top notch cept for thick fog, which will hamper the abilty for the sat to range. Overall I think its a reliable route.

  321. DirecWay experiences so far... by iron_weasel · · Score: 0

    Lots of bs so I will try for a REAL answer to the quetion.

    I too am on dialup and slow(33.6 usually) so having had DirecTV here in the country I asked my friend down the road who sells it and he let me play with it in his store. I am a programmer and was/am an electronics tech also plus a ham operators.

    DirecWay will cost approx $200 for install. Its a 65lb dish and not at all like the DirecTV disk. Its advisable to NOT use DirecWay for both TV and Net usage. If one dies then both are dead. Better to keep the DirecTV and just add a new ant, additional coax and the new (DW6000)box. Its connected via a nic card and Cat 5 cable. No usb on the 6000. You then use a wireless or wired router to spin off to other desktops. Easy I believe. His was USB and slower.

    Now the IP is in the 10.xx.xx.xx Class A and IANA
    and you can't do a trace route on it for shit. So you have , IMO, some real protection against virii and so forth. Also against hackers but its not usable for games. The UPLOAD speed was bad(36 or so) but DOWNLOAD was very fast(746 or so). Short interactive responses were of course very slow but usuable for web surfing. When it gets a large download then it excells. So the ping times are of course not that good . I got 1250 ms.

    Checking it thru DSLREPORTS gave me those figures.

    There is also FAP(Fair Access Policy) which you can run into if you exceed certain bandwidth usages of a certain time. This is too keep the bandwidth more available for those who aren't Kazaa users or bandwidth hogs.

    Cost per month is about $59.99. Hardware was quoted to me at $399. Then $200 for install comes to $600. Some ask a total of $800 but thats shoppable. This was small town USA.

    I could install it but they said then you have a problem with them not standing behind YOUR work. He said if they did it they wanted to be sure it was ok. They know me and know I could do it but they like to make a living too. Your choice but it looks doable for a good techie type. Aiming may be harder. If you get into a unsolvable problem then they may charge the hell out of you for that.

    It has pros and cons. You can't do a website. Not sure if the IP is fixed but it really doesn't matter then due to the above.

    I thought to get it but having second thoughts now. I am sometimes instead using my Kyocera 7135 on Verizon 3G to connect. Its faster than dialup. Unlimited 'Express Network(now called HotSynce)' costs $50 / month and you need at least 2 bars on the antenna signal to work ok. More the better. If a tower is local its nice but it has a tendency to go 'dormant' and has a latency due to this also some bugs still being worked out.

    Best , hands down, is cable or DSL of course. I can get neither. I would like to have both dialup and DirecWay if I have no other choices. Rain comes along satellite goes byebye for awhile.

  322. What about wireless Co-Op? by bbsguru · · Score: 1

    Is there no way to daisy chain some broadband out to the woods? Are you so far from a friendly neighbor (even a string of them) that you can't get a point-to-point wireless going?

    Using CHEAP antenna's you can go ten miles (or much more) line of sight, and with Power-over-ethernet, those cheapies can be on top of a severely tall mast...

    If that still isn't enough, better antennas cost more but go farther, and once you've bought them, they're yours.

  323. StarBand.com\6000 Model uses Ethernet by mikegroovy · · Score: 1

    From what I've read a while back, the 6000 Model uses an Ethernet port instead of a USB port. I used two direcPC Satellites about two years ago, (one for my Geeky GF and one for me) we had some old model at first then got some 4000 models, but only the the receivers not the transmitters. I was looking into Satellite internet again since some of my family lives out in the boonies... Personally I'd go with Starband.com since they don't have the Fair Access Policy (FAP) it has some high startup fees but many different plans... The best one seems to be "StarBand Model 360 Standard Plan" with a 3 year contract, $699+S&H and $49.99/mo As mentioned in the original post, latency sure does suck. I would go dial-up only when I wanted a hit of EverCrack. But with a Bidirectional Satellite Modem, you would have to pay extra for the dialup service, so as long as latency(gaming) isn't important then Satellite should do just fine. I eventually got rid of the service when mcloudteleco.com started offering Paradyne reachDSL service. Although it is not as fast as direcPC, it is cheaper, and there is no FAP Cap. For more info on the FAP go here: http://www.copperhead.cc/fap.html Also, I was unable to connect through IPSec when using the satellite, I don't know if anything has changed since back then, maybe the 6000 model doesn't have the same limitations as the earlier versions.

  324. Long(er) Distance DSL by redsilo · · Score: 1

    Our Telephone Cooperative/Internet provider is beginning to offer what they call long distance DSl. I looked for it on their website(www.pldi.net) but could find no mention of it there. If I remember the blurb correctly they were advertising sevice as far from the switch as 12 to 15 miles. The technicians that intalled my regular ADSL a little over a year ago claimed to have installed it for customers as far away as 8 miles and the customer was delighted. Not sure what kind of speed can be expected at that distance. Maybe that is something that could be done in your area if some company were willing to step forward to provide the service. redsilo

  325. I am mostly unimpressed with direcway by stilldead · · Score: 1

    I helped set it up for a friend who had an AOL dialup connection. All I hear now is how the upload speeds are horrible. When they try to send an email with images in it, it takes forever. Whenever they try to use UPS for online shipping it is dramatically slower. Also they have said that sometimes their download speeds get extremely slow as well. All of this is with all of the hacks to speed up the connection installed. I would say that when I tested it the download speeds were dramatically faster than my 512K DSL and the upload speeds averaged betweem 14 and 40K. The 40K average only showed up on large transfers. I have a feeling that large buffer sizes in some portion of the satellite unit are the key to the slowness, but there may also be rebroadcast regulations that play into the speed.
    Anyhow, maybe this is helpful.
    Enjoy

    --
    You are lucky, Ed Gruberman. Few novices experience so much of Ti Kwan Leep so soon.
  326. DirecWay by jhdeval · · Score: 1

    I had DirecWay and yes you are right about the latency and it is a major issue. For two reasons yes it cripples games but when you send requests they are also slow. The downloads are great if that is all your doing but in today's internet world you are sending quite a bit of data as well as downloading it. Beyond that The installation cost us $700.00 dollars about two years ago. Those may have come down a bit. Our next issue was a lockup issue. It would randomly just lockup and we would have to disconnect it from the usb port shut the server down and unplug the sat receiver. This happened about every 3 days. Again this was supposed to be fixed in a fimware upgrade. I never kept it long enough for that to happen. At any rate all in all it was better than dial up but it has it's drawbacks and depending on what YOU are expecting you may find it works for you.

  327. Re: Experiences with DirecWay Satellite Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some real world ovservations on satellite connectivity:

    Not only will you experience the latency issues... ...but due to the fact most satellite-based ISPs utilize proprietary communications and compression protocols, you will likely also find problems using IPSec over satellite links... ...specifically with respect to KeepAlive on stateful connections.

    just my two cents

  328. Same issue as banning all P2P due to "piracy" by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    When you go to a drug dealer to buy oregano, don't be surprised when the cops knock your door down. These people were buying hardware from places they KNEW were not entirely above board.

    "Above board"? Are you claiming that the programmers were built with stolen parts? That the sale itself was breaking some law?

    No, you're not claiming any such thing. In your view they're ONLY "shady" because many of their customers intended to use the devices to steal service.

    That's EXACTLY the same argument as banning all peer-to-peer protocols - napster, gnutella, FTP, etc. - because SOME people use them to infringe copyrights. Or banning DAT tape drives, VCRs, casette tape drives, reel-to-reel tape drives, and photocopiers for the same reason. Or banning search engines because they index copyrighted files, thus facilitating copyright infringement.

    It's also the same issue as banning aluminum foil because some people use it to line hashish pipes. Or banning "tire thumpers" (used by truckers to prevent dangerous blowouts on the road by quickly checking tire pressure) because they're usable as a billyclub. Or blocking under-21 boaters from possessing distress flare guns (thus killing some of them in high-wave coastal waters where a handheld distress flare will not be seen) because of their similarity to a pistol.

    The courts are clear on this. A dual-use technology is legal if ANY of its common uses are legal, even if MOST times it's used a law is broken. This leaves DirecTV in the position of an extortionist, using the high cost of defending onself in court to impose penalties for strictly legal actions in an attempt to intimidate their victims.

    Yes, DTV caught a few dolphins in with their tuna, but you don't hear about all those tuna.

    So do you also propose a final solution to the "Palestinian Problem" by killing all the Palestinians? Or maybe all the Israelis?

    If you want a martcard programmer for a legal project, they can be obtained from proper, reputable, legal venders. (and yes, they're more expensive than the 20$ hacker junk.)

    So people should have to pay enormously more money for a less-functional product, even though the product is LEGAL, simply because SOME (maybe even MOST) of the OTHER purchasers use their new purchase for a crime?

    What happened to the free market? What happened to price competition and innovation? What happened to small entrepeneurs beating the large corporations at their own business? Do you oppose those as well?

    This is no different from buying guns from a guy in an alley.

    Yes it is different. SELLING that gun in the alley, without the appropriate federal and state paperwork, is on the books as a felony - which also makes buying it a crime.

    (And I'll leave the issue of whether even THOSE laws are valid under the 2nd Amendment to some other thread.)

    Freedom means letting other people do things you don't like. So get over it.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  329. Only solution - bonded modems... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only solution for the good Cmdr is to bond at least 3 or more modems. Earthlink (despite the fact that they shovel money into the evil Scientology cult) will allow multiple logins on the same account - therefore you can get ISDN equilivalent speeds from them without paying more than the $19.99 per month. The downside is, you guessed, it three phone lines. It is more reliable than DirecWay (or any satellite providers) is more responsive than DirecWay (with latencies only in the 200-300ms range, still bad, but better than 2-5 seconds in satellite roundtrips). Plus, there are a few routers out there that do the triple channel bonding for you.

    1. Re:Only solution - bonded modems... by Laptop+Dancer · · Score: 1

      Yep that works. I found a tech in the boonies of Wisconsin who moved one of our remote sales guys onto 4 bonded modems. He configured a Linux gateway which had the modems and keeps the "four horsemen of the Apocalypse", as we came to call the solution, dialed in if they dropped off. He came close to continuous 256 up/down all the time for the 3 machines on his network.

  330. DirecWay is (was?) really Hughes by __aannpi2461 · · Score: 0

    I put in a network in a million dollar house (a friend's, not mine) perched on a cliff face in the Ozarks. They used DirecWay for connectivity and a cheap Dell PC running Wingate for the router. The following observations apply:

    1. The original equipment installer makes a big difference. There are a lot of details to keep track of, and a missed detail creates huge problems later. On our site, the installer aimed the feed horn at the wrong satellite. Hughes/DirecWay thought the box was in one subnet, when it was really in another. The thing only worked intermittently for the first three months until a DirecWay support guy noticed the IP we were getting. Rather than reassign us a new IP, we wound up having the tech come out to re-aim the dish. We discovered shortly after that that he had failed to ground the dish assembly properly, too. Wound up killing three satellite TV receivers before we figured that one out.

    2. The ping times are brutal. SSH to a machine in Chicago got to the 1 second per keystroke level at one point. Games other than chess are right out.

    3. Transfer speeds for longer downloads are actually pretty good. Streaming was okay, too, as long as there was no unexpected return traffic.

    4. There aren't too many support options for software routers, and the equipment we were using was satellite on one side and USB cable on the other. Wingate, as it turns out, has a native driver for the Hughes USB equipment. There's an open source project, too, but configuring a Linux box to use one of these things is pretty hairy. I believe there's newer equipment available now that will output to an ethernet port, but you might want to do some research there.

    5. The DirecWay software is Windows-based. It installs either on a lone client machine, or on the gateway PC alongside the router software. The latest version is pretty stable, but the software is closely tied to the firmware in the transceivers you get from DirecWay, so version upgrades and bug fixes have to happen separately for every kind of equipment they have in the field. This means bugs tend to linger a while.

    6. Weather is a factor. High-sun days heat the dish and cause something called thermal fade, or heat fade. Sunspots are a big deal, especially this year. Rain isn't too bad, nor is snow. Electrical storms, however, are a show stopper. I don't know about Ann Arbor, but Shell Knob, MO gets some of the most amazing lightning storms I've ever seen. In the spring, this rig was down a few hours every night for a few weeks.

    7. Support is spotty. The first-tier guys are, frankly, miserable. They don't even do much of a job reading the scripted answers off the cards. The second-tier support "specialists" are a different matter; very knowledgeable and extremely willing to "own your issue" until it is resolved. Sadly, I know this because I've had to deal with three of them. Field installers are almost all subcontractors. DirecWay uses their network of satellite TV installers to deploy the internet equipment. Some of them know what they're doing. Some are in the field because their landscaping job was taken over by a cheaper laborer. There's no way to know which you'll get.

    8. There are a lot of variables in this particular setup. You're radiating high-frequency RF into open space, and a million things can happen to the signal en route. Some of the equipment in this setup lives in space along with radiation, thermal swings that would surprise a Midwesterner, meteors, sunspots, and what-have-you; sometimes things just don't work for a while. Hughes is trying to either sell off or retool this whole endeavor; as a result, what they do with your packets once they receive them isn't entirely predictable from week to week.

    All in all, it took us a year or so to get this running as well as it is. At peak performance, it's about 400k down and 50k up, with 800ms+ ping times. It stalls about ten times a month (or more) for weather, software hangs or freak space gremlins. We rely on Wingate's squid cache to m

  331. Better than Dial-up by Obhaso · · Score: 1

    I used the system for just over a year, re-sold through Earthlink.

    Yep, the download cap sucks, but I found that I didn't hit it very often. Also, the upload is basically that of a dial-up, and I could never get it better, though some people claim that they have.

    As for the uptime. I found that the weather problems weren't as bad as they made them out to be, but I'm in Northern CA so it never gets any worse than kinda foggy and cold!

    Never had a problem with DNS servers not including sites, but then again I wasn't doing anything other than editing and maintaining a site.

    The support blows chinks. Forty minutes a call sounds like heaven to me. When I first had it installed the installer guy gave up after a couple hours and I personally spent the next week on the phone with those idiots trying to get it to work, and it was a mistake on their end. Basically, if you have a problem, you have to learn how to fix it yourself, unless you have a week or so to waste, but as was said before, this might just be Earthlink, although I have my doubts that the Hughes support staff even exists. If you need help, I found Direcway Uncensored to be very useful and informative.

    I found that the Hughes software locked up our machie once or twice a day, but after fighting with it for a year I think I finally got that worked out. Now, however, I think they're only offering the DW6000 which plugs directly into a network, which should make life so much easier. I have heard nothing but good reviews of that unit, but can't afford it right now, so I've never used it myself.

    Basically, as long as you can get it set up and are willing to dedicate some time to learning how to run the stupid thing, it's better than dial-up and pretty good, as long as you're not expecting anything like regular broadband. I would recommend it if you have a choice between dial-up and this.

    Good luck!

  332. Do not get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DirecWay has this wonderful thing called its FAP. You can only download around 200mb in a couple of hours before they throttle you to dial up speeds. It's not fun. Not to mention their "snappy" http proxy doesn't work on pretty much every site with cgi submits.

  333. Then there are the seasonal outages by ewanrg · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised no one else has mentioned this as it was the one thing that finally moved me off satellite.

    Twice a year, near (but not on) the equinox you will have a period of about a week where the sun appears to be lined up with the satellite and you will have low to no signal. Generally this is during daytime hours, and so folks who only use the system at night may not have noticed. But boy it made my life "fun" for a while.

    As other posters have suggested, you might want to see if there's fixed wireless available near you, or if you can find someone line-of-sight who can access DSL or Cable who'd be willing to let you setup a link much as Bob Cringely described a year or two ago on his site.

    FWIW...

  334. VSat hell by lazysquid · · Score: 1

    I have been a direcway subscriber for about 4 years because I too live in the country. My primary job requires that I be able to be connected and move data and source around. I get to see my 2 year old daughter and wife every day when I am at home. We have llamas and horses and a bunch or other animals. I have tractors, trucks, and other big equipment to play with. The trade-offs are worth it. However my direcway experience has not been too good. It crashes (driver instabilities) and slows down dramatically during peak times. It will seem slower than a 56k dial-up when you are browsing. I choose my tooling carefully. I write automation scripts. I work longer hours. If I really need to I can go to a local store and use their wireless bradband for about $5 an hour. The only problem I have is large database files and sometimes big doc files. There is a throttling mechanism that limits you to about 50k if you pull too much data too fast. The tech support is not very good. Here is a good article for direcpc, and it still applies to direcway: http://www.hamradio-online.com/1999/nov/direcpc2.h tml I have one of the DW6000 units on order, but haven't heard anything about the install yet. I can't tell if it provides the DHCP address to the client uses it itself to proxy the requests. The current setup I use proxys the traffic for one machine and provides an address on their private network. Not all of the addresses have reverse resolution so I have had probelms with mail servers. The address is only "live" during the proxied transaction and can be pinged from the internet during the transaction, but only them. When the client is idle the traffic is not passed in from the net. I had to install a firewall because my system was getting infected by viruses even though I was behind their proxy. I use VPN and SSL from behind their proxy. I use sygate office network on my local server so I can support multiple VPN tunnels through the direcway system. The satellite driver requires a seperate systray applet to work correctly and does not work with M.S. routing and remote access, so no built-in VPN. There is a Linux driver out there, but it requires initial setup on a windows box and was still pre-release last time I looked. There are other bidirectional satellite providers out there now. My research has shown that the equipment cost is more, but the service is better.

  335. Here is the real Direcway scoop by tigershark97 · · Score: 1

    There are alot of mistaken comments in this thread. Here it is from a Direcway user. Their service sucks. If you don't feel like tweaking it all yourself, don't get it. I had to (after my professional? install) repoint my dish and actually tighten the bolts. Have had a great signal ever since. I have had no weather outages, even when my Dish network tv sat was out. The built in proxy server kinda screws with some pages. As in, half your pictures don't load most of the time. Downloads are always faster than they advertise. I constantly get 1megabits/sec. I have seen a max of 1.7. But, here is the biggest problem of all with Direcway. FAP! The fair access policy. Basically, you can download 169meg in an eight hour period. Once you hit that, you are at 56k. Picture a bucket full of 169mb. There is a trickle at 56k filling it. You can use it all at once if you want, but then the bucket refills at 56k, and thats all you get till it fills up again. Its great for downloading small programs, patches, mp3's, etc. But no way you can download a Linux distro, or anything that big. There it is. For me, its better than dialup, but it is far from being "broadband"

  336. DirecWay Experience by TuballoyThunder · · Score: 1
    We use DirecWay in a bit of an extreme situation--on top of a mountain in the middle of nowhere. At 8000 feet, Mother Nature can be tougher to deal with when compared to a typical installation. On the plus side we have a very unobstructed view to the satellite. We do not have the DW6000, we have the USB version that requires drivers that runs under Windows.

    First, we never saw speeds reaching what was advertised, maybe about 200 kbps down. You definitely want to go with the professional install--it was not pricey even with the surcharge for coming out to the sticks (2.5 hour drive).

    We run a web proxy application on the Windows machines, which provides HTTP connectivity to the other machines in the network. We never tried a "conversational" protocol like SSH, but my guess is the latency would be problematic.

    Suprisingly, rain and snow have not been a big deal. We have both DirecTV and DirecWay and I cannot recall a rain or snow outage. Last time I was there, not only did we have snow, but the cloud level was about 6000 ft. With those conditions, the DirecTV signal strength was 80 to 90.

    I would give you more details, but Mother Nature and her 50-70 mph winds pushed the dish out of alignment and we have had the worst time getting it pointed again. The dish has three degrees of freedom (elevation, azimuth, and polarity) and getting it right involves moving all three axes. While trying to fix the alignment, the RX signal strength would oscillate between 0 and 70--needless to say that made it difficult to align. I would recommend you do the following after a successful installation:

    • Record all the positions of the dish
    • Verify that the post is plumb
    • Mark the positions on the dish
    The other thing to consider is that you definitely do not want to have people or animals within 3 feet of the business end of the dish--the TX power is significant. That basically rules out ground-level installations.
  337. Alternative to sat by rs79 · · Score: 1

    1) Bonded dialup PPP
    I get 33.6K here at the best of times. I have two circuits right now,
    my wife has one and I have one. What I'm gonna do soon is bond
    them so there's one 66K feed. The local ISP will support this,
    if it works out ok I may double it to a 134K feed. Not cheap
    really and still stuck with dialup latencies, but it might work out.

    2) HDSL.
    I dunno about there, but here you can order a "4 wire unloaded
    circuit" which is just a copper run from point A to point B.
    How they wire it is a bit cariable, but if they come in under
    the HSDL disatance limit you can get Pairgain HDSL boxen on
    ebay real cheap. Basically you'd have to string segments of
    these to the closest DSL enabled area.

    --
    Need Mercedes parts ?
  338. Re:Got a T1 line to your house! TDS Metrocom by StarsAreAlsoFire · · Score: 1

    Not to certain, but I just started reading into some VoIP...'stuff'. Implication so far is that the bandwidth you mentioned would be more than sufficient for FAR more than 5 lines. More like 10 or 15 -- voice uses something like 38kb/s Sooo, maybe you are getting screwed? Just a happy thought :~) I'm sure someone will tell me how much shit I am full of if such is the case.

  339. Re:Got a T1 line to your house! TDS Metrocom by Havokmon · · Score: 1
    Not to certain, but I just started reading into some VoIP...'stuff'. Implication so far is that the bandwidth you mentioned would be more than sufficient for FAR more than 5 lines. More like 10 or 15 -- voice uses something like 38kb/s Sooo, maybe you are getting screwed? Just a happy thought :~) I'm sure someone will tell me how much shit I am full of if such is the case.

    Well, I guess it depends on how you look at it ;)

    T1's are 24 channels, 23 if it's a PRI. PRI is a 23 B channel ISDN, with a single D channel. Each channel is normally a single voice channel. This is _not_ VOIP, but how the telco's traditionally work. If you want to think of it in smaller terms, the telco is taking a channel from any one of their T1's, converting it back to analog, and running that POTS line to your home.

    heh. Think DSL or 56k modems. You want as little analog wire between you and the digital conversion as possible. Because I'll be converting to analog in my basement I'll have maybe 25ft of analog signal. That would give me reliable 52k connections everytime. I used to run a PBX for a bank, and we had awesome 56k dialouts ;)

    So it really depends on how you look at it.. I was thinking of utilizing the extra lines for local dial-out to support that free VOIP LD network for my local prefix. Remember the name of that project?

    Ah well.. Hope that makes sense ;)

    --
    "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
  340. Straight from The Onione by wantobe · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hey, are you this guy?

  341. No Way Direcway! by firemedic510 · · Score: 1

    I have had direcpc (dial up/sat return) since 1996. I live in an outlying rural area also, and dial up sucks. So I got it, being it was THE only game in town.

    Wow. I loved the speed.

    Wow. I hate the tech support. They are clueless beyond measure.

    I had to figure out how to re-align my dish when they changed satellites, their tech idiots couldn't help. The stories go on. If you are interested in hearing more, drop me an email -

    firemedic510 (nospam)AT msn.com

    Pray to God to strike your ass dead before you get direcway. Buy a T1. Move somewhere else. Just don't get DirecPC/Way.

    FYI - the TV service is fine. It is the bastard satellite internet department that suffers.

    --
    Selah.
  342. re: DirectWay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a pain in the ass to configure wireless with the directway system, and the latency isn't noticeable after browsing for a while.

  343. My Experiences with DirecWay (business grade) by KoolAidMan · · Score: 1
    Vital Stats
    • Account Type: Business, 2 way
    • IP: Static
    • Installation Fee: $300
    • Monthly Price: $129, 1yr term (which includes the $10 extra for static IP)
    • Monthly Bandwidth: 1GB
    • Location: BFE Tennessee
    • Provider: DirecWay via reseller SkyCasters (www.skycasters.com)
    • Hardware: DirecWay Dish with a 3-part OS-independent DirecWay DW4020 system, to which a SMC Barricade(TM) Wireless Cable/DSL Broadband Router (SMC7004VWBR) connects **

    Original Problem
    One of my company's operations handles barges of wood and other materials traveling up and down the river system, and recently opened a new terminal (barge loading/unloading point) on the Tennessee River. It was decided that an internet connection was needed at this location, as well as a network camera (we have been installing these throughout our facilities). Due to the location, there is no wired broadband access available, and the phone system is iffy even for voice calls. No cell phone digital data is available service either (even voice cell service is spotty, I had to install a repeater to get decent service at the location, which is a whole other story in itself).

    Ordering Process
    So this leads us to satellite internet, the only real option. After researching it, I decided to go with a reseller, and SkyCasters seemed to be the best for us. They're based in Akron, OH, but they contract the installation work to the nearest available installer (which happened to be about an hour's drive from our location). SkyCasters deal directly with DirecWay, and according to them, are the only provider that have their servers co-located in the Hughes network facility. The ordering process included an phone interview with a sales person to determine our needs, and then various contracts and such to set up the installation and account.

    Installation
    I traveled to our location in TN to set up the local network at our facility, and was there for the setup of the satellite system. SkyCasters shipped all the hardware directly to our location via UPS, and set up the install with the local installer. The installer called the day of installation to let me know he was on his way, and got more specific directions for finding us.
    SkyCasters' installation package includes a setup script for the installer to follow, as well as one for the client to follow, to make sure everything is set up correctly.
    The installer assembled the dish and mounted it on the top of a stationary trailer that we use there as a storage unit, it has a flat roof. The mount is a non-penetrating roof mount, which involves a flat steel frame, with a rubber mat. Within the 2 sections of this frame, 3 concrete blocks are laid on each side, on the rubber mat, which passes over the middle bar of the frame. These blocks hold the frame down against the roof, as well as preventing any lateral movement - it seems weird but it works very well. To this frame is bolted the mounting arm of the dish, which he pointed and locked without any problem. He also ran the cabling from the dish to inside our office unit, cable tying it and otherwise locking the cables in place.

    Then he followed the rest of the script to set up the networking part of the system, by which I mean the 4020 itself. He had a little trouble with his laptop at this point and spent quite a while on the phone with SkyCasters tech support, but did eventually manage to get it working. (this part I blame on the fact that he was using Windows ME on his laptop, trying to get networking set up properly on that is a nightmare)
    The whole installation took about 4 hours, from arrival of the installer to his departure. Your experience with installation may vary since, as I mentioned before, they subcontract local installers for this.

    Setup
    Once we had a computer connected directly to the 4020 and

    1. Re:My Experiences with DirecWay (business grade) by KoolAidMan · · Score: 1

      Forgot a very important vital stat!! Hardware Cost: $1500, one time charge.

  344. Re: Geographically declined by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you sure you lived in Grand Haven? I've lived there most of my life and it's quite a hike from Hope, not to mention Ann Arbor. In any case, cable and DSL are available in most of the surrounding areas.Grand Haven now has wireless covering most of the town for $20 a month.
    Unfortunately, Taco is outside of ANN ARBOR 3 hours away and no where near Hope College. In any case, I live outside of Grand Haven now in Verizon's rural wasteland. To be brief, my phone is useable 1.5 weeks out of a month, there's a nice loud HUMMM the rest of the time. So no 56k, 40k, or even 28.8 most days. And, at 18000 feet, I doubt I'll ever get DSL.
    So, CT, After giving up a cable modem in my move I've looked at all the rural options. Download caps and latency (one or the other would be fine to me)keep me away from satellite. I would urge you to wait until a WISP is available in the area. We even have one here in West Michigan, but the tall oaks surrounding me prevent me from establishing Line of Site. WISPs are popping up all over the place so you shouldn't have to wait long. They might also have d/l caps, but the speed is excellent and the price is right. Currently $50/mo, $500 install includes equipment.

    Drink Michigan Beer

  345. Starband... by rbf · · Score: 1

    I'm in a similar situation where dialup is the only land-based possibility and WIFI is impossible because of all the damn trees (northwestern most portion of Washington state). I ended up going with Starband. The 480 Pro is very expensive ($139/month for me) and the hardware is waaaaay too much (I paid a little over $800), but it works extremely well (most of the time) and happily works with my D-Link DI-614+ router. I recently started writing a review (it's mostly done, but not 100%) on my personal site that pretty much covers most of the pros and cons as I see them.

    Good luck.

  346. Any comments on Skycasters? by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

    http://www.skycasters.com/

    This group seems to get good reviews in newsgroups etc. They use the Hughes network but have some of their own equipment. Supposedly, they allocate bandwidth and such in a way to ensure more predictable transfer rates.

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
  347. Re: Broadband TV? by starrsoft · · Score: 1

    What broadband service TV do you use?

    --
    Read my blog: HansMast.com
  348. I think you missed his point. by orichter · · Score: 1

    If the DW6000 is assigning ip addresses on the 192.168 range, simply set your router to assign addresses on the 10.2 range. Plug the lan port of DW6000 to the wan port of your router, and you still have a full router between you and the DW6000. If your DW6000 has a dynamic ip address anyway, the only down side is the increased lag due to the extra level of NAT (which is tiny compared to the inherent lag of DirectWay). I already use this technique to keep a firewall between my wireless router and my wired router. I put all untrusted machines (i.e. web servers, wirelessly connected computers, kids computers) in this DMZ, and keep my important trusted computers behind both firewalls. Send questions to owen_richter hotmail address if you want some tips on how to do this.

  349. Starband Experiences by gnetwerker · · Score: 1

    I've had the Starband system at my summer house in a remote area of the southwest Washington (state) Pacific coast for several years, so I've had 2-way satellite service for about as long as it's been available at consumer prices ($69.99/mo). I have just gotten DSL service, so I may not have it for much longer.

    Use: I spend 1-2 weeks/month at the house, but it's not my primary residence. I use the connection when I am there for the normal set of web/email uses plus some ftp. When I'm not there (actually, all the time), I try to upload weather and still images from webcams to my offsite servers.

    Speed: Everything said thus far about ping times is obviously right. The upshot of this is that anything interactive is painful, as noted. For webpages that can be accelerated by the proxy servers in place, speed is pretty good -- comparable to broadband -- until you try to do something secure, at which point it slows down to about 2x modem speed, sometimes faster. Uploads were, as with most asymmetrical systems, highly variable, and mostly sucked.

    Reliability: The Starband service goes down for a few minutes at most daily, and at least weekly. Much of this is caused by rain or sun (the few times a year when the sun is directly behind the satellite), but some of it is not attributable to that. Seldom has it been worse than a minor annoyance, but don't count on anything that can't easily reset itself after a lost connection.

    Hardware: The original Starband 180 modems really sucked eggs, and the replacement process was a bureaucratic nightmare, but the 360 modem in use now has ethernet and seems to work, aside from requiring a more-or-less dedicated server. I wouldn't run 2-way satellite without putting a server between me and it. Oh, server must be Windows :-(

    Installation: I have a rooftop installation carefully pointed between tall trees, but it seems to work. It's unsightly, but has high geek factor. My installer seemed competent.

    Bottom Line: Only you can decide whether it's worth it versus the alternatives, whatever they are, for your location. For me, it was better than dialup (including ganged 2-modem dialup), but worse than all non-available alternatives (Wireless (trees), T1 (cost), DSL/Cable (not available)). Like everything else, most of the horror stories have a grain of truth, coupled with outsized expectations. The difference between the horror stories and the "I love it" zealots seems more about expectations than anything else.

    gnet

  350. direcpc review by JimtownKelly · · Score: 1

    looked into this when in a rural area w/o broadband. chose 128k ISDN instead, more reliable and dedicated bandwidth made it seem faster than prime-time broadband in a metro area. chose against directway for the following reasons: high latency slower upload speed vs. download: important if you're a develpper or graphic artist, not so if you mainly just surf the web as one other user mentioned, the usb connection-only is a pain-in-the-ass, hopefully this has changed. hope this helps Kelly

    --
    -- Jimtown Kelly
  351. Hey, give Taco a break. Taco, try fixed-wireless by Christ0ph · · Score: 1
    You can run 802.11b over fairly long distances given the right kind of equipment. I'd suggest two 24 dbi parabolic dishes at each end of the link. Can you get line of sight to the Slashdot offices, even if they are a long distance away?


    Alternatively, there may be local providers who would give you fixed wireless. (again, over a spread-spectrum based radio link) Around here in the Bay Area there are several. They can set somebody up with a T1 link for quite reasonable damages.


    If you are not line of sight, there is the possibility of using a passive repreater in the middle. (two high gain antennas connected together) Think about it!

  352. Don't buy DIRECTV.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you care at all about your personal privacy, DO NOT BUY DIRECTV! There's an unpatched exploit that allows people to compromise your account. They've known about it for over a year but won't even acknowledge it.

    http://www.geocities.com/foogert99/

  353. Re: Broadband TV? by John+Murdoch · · Score: 1

    I don't subscribe to a paid service like RealOne--I look at different news sites.